Cities Index.
Letters from the Public - 2 of 5

San Jose City Council
January 27, 2026

Document
Letters from the Public - 2 of 5
Meeting
January 27, 2026
Body
San Jose City Council
Original file
39.8 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

Outlook
Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
From Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Date Fri 1/9/2026 1:08 PM
To Agendadesk <[email protected]>
U 5 attachments (3 MB)
Rick-Schertle.pdf; Michele-Coleman.pdf; Phil-Hines.pdf; Sigrid-Jacobsen.pdf; Stephanie-Preston.pdf; Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas
City of San José | Office of the City Clerk
200 East Santa Clara St. - Tower 14th Fl.

San José, CA 95113-1905
Phone 408.535.1260| Fax 408.292.6207
[email protected]
*Memos, items, and attachments must be submitted to [email protected] before 12PM on the Thursday before the intended Rules meeting* Holidays may impact this schedule; revised deadlines will be noticed as applicable.

From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2026 12:06 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Your feedback is appreciated!
From: EA
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2026 12:04 PM
To: District3 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Campos, Pamela <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; City Clerk < [email protected]> Subject: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
[External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more] Hello Mayor and City Councilmembers
Please see the below attachments of residents and workers in San Jose who support maintaining 30% AMI affordable housing as a requirement in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.

Thank you!
Sign Petitions:

Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance https://form.jotform.com/260031040852038 Symbols of Identity and Belonging at City Hall: https://form.jotform.com/253548517960062 Enhance Civic Participation: https://form.jotform.com/253544303745153 Here4You Homeless Shelter Hotline: (408)-385-2400
Elizabeth Agramont-Justiniano
she/her/ella/GIRRLL!
My personal brand:
-Creativity
-Compassion
-Commitment
-Consistency
-Courage
-Community Centeredness
Artist/Creative
Expand TRUST in SJ! Mental Health Matters!
Political Ambassador, Afro UPRIS/Black Democratic Club of SCC: Black Lives and Black Permanency Matters! Chair Ad-Hoc Committee on Housing and Homelessness, SCCDP Choir+ Member of Urban Sanctuary
Build the Bench 2025 Cohort, Member of SVYD
Civic Leadership 2026 Cohort, Silicon Valley at Home
Housing Justice Advocate
Downtown Resident of District 3: St. James/Julian Neighborhood Values: Honesty, Kindness, Compassion, Courage, Justice "Democracy only works when we work for it. When we fight for it, when we demand it."~Stacey Abrams Thank you!
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Michele Coleman
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series feting are tries each
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Phil Hines
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Rick Schertle
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series feting are tries each
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Sigrid Jacobsen
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Stephanie Preston
Email
1 Address
2 Outlook
Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
From Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Date Fri 1/9/2026 1:08 PM
To Agendadesk <[email protected]>
U 1 attachment (560 KB)
Tomara-Hall.pdf;
Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas
City of San José | Office of the City Clerk
200 East Santa Clara St. - Tower 14th Fl.

San José, CA 95113-1905
Phone 408.535.1260| Fax 408.292.6207
[email protected]
*Memos, items, and attachments must be submitted to [email protected] before 12PM on the Thursday before the intended Rules meeting* Holidays may impact this schedule; revised deadlines will be noticed as applicable.

From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2026 12:06 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Your feedback is appreciated!
From: E A <
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2026 12:05 PM
To: District3 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Campos, Pamela <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
[External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more] Hello Mayor and City Councilmembers
Please see the below attachments of residents and workers in San Jose who support maintaining 30% AMI affordable housing as a requirement in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.

Thank you!
Sign Petitions:

Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance https://form.jotform.com/260031040852038 Symbols of Identity and Belonging at City Hall: https://form.jotform.com/253548517960062 Enhance Civic Participation: https://form.jotform.com/253544303745153 Here4You Homeless Shelter Hotline: (408)-385-2400
Elizabeth Agramont-Justiniano
she/her/ella/GIRRLL!
My personal brand:
-Creativity
-Compassion
-Commitment
-Consistency
-Courage
-Community Centeredness
Artist/Creative
Expand TRUST in SJ! Mental Health Matters!
Political Ambassador, Afro UPRIS/Black Democratic Club of SCC: Black Lives and Black Permanency Matters! Chair Ad-Hoc Committee on Housing and Homelessness, SCCDP Choir+ Member of Urban Sanctuary
Build the Bench 2025 Cohort, Member of SVYD
Civic Leadership 2026 Cohort, Silicon Valley at Home
Housing Justice Advocate
Downtown Resident of District 3: St. James/Julian Neighborhood Values: Honesty, Kindness, Compassion, Courage, Justice "Democracy only works when we work for it. When we fight for it, when we demand it."~Stacey Abrams Thank you!
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Thursday, January 8, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series feting are tries each
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Tomara Hall
Email
1 Address
2 Outlook
Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
From Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Date Fri 1/9/2026 1:08 PM
To Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Ul 5 attachments (3 MB)
Emily-hendon.pdf; Joan-Howe.pdf; Celine-DinhJanelle.pdf; Deborah-StJulien.pdf; Christopher-Nelson.pdf; Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas
City of San José | Office of the City Clerk
200 East Santa Clara St. - Tower 14th Fl.

San José, CA 95113-1905
Phone 408.535.1260| Fax 408.292.6207
[email protected]
*Memos, items, and attachments must be submitted to [email protected] before 12PM on the Thursday before the intended Rules meeting* Holidays may impact this schedule; revised deadlines will be noticed as applicable.

From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2026 12:06 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Your feedback is appreciated!
From: E A <
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2026 12:01 PM
To: District3 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Campos, Pamela <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; City Clerk < [email protected]> Subject: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
[External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more] Hello Mayor and City Councilmembers
Please see the below attachments of residents and workers in San Jose who support maintaining 30% AMI affordable housing as a requirement in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.

Thank you!
Sign Petitions:

Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance https://form.jotform.com/260031040852038 Symbols of Identity and Belonging at City Hall: https://form.jotform.com/253548517960062 Enhance Civic Participation: https://form.jotform.com/253544303745153 Here4You Homeless Shelter Hotline: (408)-385-2400
Elizabeth Agramont-Justiniano
she/her/ella/GIRRLL!
My personal brand:
-Creativity
-Compassion
-Commitment
-Consistency
-Courage
-Community Centeredness
Artist/Creative
Expand TRUST in SJ! Mental Health Matters!
Political Ambassador, Afro UPRIS/Black Democratic Club of SCC: Black Lives and Black Permanency Matters! Chair Ad-Hoc Committee on Housing and Homelessness, SCCDP Choir+ Member of Urban Sanctuary
Build the Bench 2025 Cohort, Member of SVYD
Civic Leadership 2026 Cohort, Silicon Valley at Home
Housing Justice Advocate
Downtown Resident of District 3: St. James/Julian Neighborhood Values: Honesty, Kindness, Compassion, Courage, Justice "Democracy only works when we work for it. When we fight for it, when we demand it."~Stacey Abrams Thank you!
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Celine DinhJanelle
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series el in are at ales ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Christopher Nelson
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series el in are at ales ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Deborah StJulien
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class sphoning of our ngis and resources and tempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Emily hendon
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series el in are at ales ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Joan Howe
Email
1 Address
2 Outlook
Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
From Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Date Fri 1/9/2026 1:08 PM
To . Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Ul 5 attachments (3 MB)
Joan-Howe.pdf; Deborah-StJulien.pdf; Emily-hendon.pdf; Michele-Coleman.pdf; Karen-Reed (1).pdf; Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas
City of San José | Office of the City Clerk
200 East Santa Clara St. - Tower 14th Fl.

San José, CA 95113-1905
Phone 408.535.1260| Fax 408.292.6207
[email protected]
*Memos, items, and attachments must be submitted to [email protected] before 12PM on the Thursday before the intended Rules meeting* Holidays may impact this schedule; revised deadlines will be noticed as applicable.

From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2026 12:06 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Your feedback is appreciated!
From: E A
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2026 12:02 PM
To: District3 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Campos, Pamela <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; City Clerk < [email protected]> Subject: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
[External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more] Hello Mayor and City Councilmembers
Please see the below attachments of residents and workers in San Jose who support maintaining 30% AMI affordable housing as a requirement in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.

Thank you!
Sign Petitions:

Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance https://form.jotform.com/260031040852038 Symbols of Identity and Belonging at City Hall: https://form.jotform.com/253548517960062 Enhance Civic Participation: https://form.jotform.com/253544303745153 Here4You Homeless Shelter Hotline: (408)-385-2400
Elizabeth Agramont-Justiniano
she/her/ella/GIRRLL!
My personal brand:
-Creativity
-Compassion
-Commitment
-Consistency
-Courage
-Community Centeredness
Artist/Creative
Expand TRUST in SJ! Mental Health Matters!
Political Ambassador, Afro UPRIS/Black Democratic Club of SCC: Black Lives and Black Permanency Matters! Chair Ad-Hoc Committee on Housing and Homelessness, SCCDP Choir+ Member of Urban Sanctuary
Build the Bench 2025 Cohort, Member of SVYD
Civic Leadership 2026 Cohort, Silicon Valley at Home
Housing Justice Advocate
Downtown Resident of District 3: St. James/Julian Neighborhood Values: Honesty, Kindness, Compassion, Courage, Justice "Democracy only works when we work for it. When we fight for it, when we demand it."~Stacey Abrams Thank you!
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Deborah StJulien
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Michele Coleman
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Emily hendon
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, Januar 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Joan Howe
Email
1 Address
Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, Siphoning of our ngis and resources and tempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Karen Reed
Email
1 Address
2 Outlook
Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
From Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Date Fri 1/9/2026 1:08 PM
To Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Ul 5 attachments (3 MB)
Alison-George.pdf; Abigail-McManus.pdf; Angie-Schertle.pdf; Cathleen-Trowbridge.pdf; Amanda-Flores.pdf; Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas
City of San José | Office of the City Clerk
200 East Santa Clara St. - Tower 14th Fl.

San José, CA 95113-1905
Phone 408.535.1260 | Fax 408.292.6207
[email protected]
*Memos, items, and attachments must be submitted to [email protected] before 12PM on the Thursday before the intended Rules meeting* Holidays may impact this schedule; revised deadlines will be noticed as applicable.

From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2026 12:05 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Your feedback is appreciated!
Sent: Friday, January 9, 2026 11:59 AM
To: District3 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <Rosemary. [email protected]>; Campos, Pamela <Pamela. [email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <Bien. [email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
[External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more] Hello Mayor and City Councilmembers
Please see the below attachments of residents and workers in San Jose who support maintaining 30% AMI affordable housing as a requirement in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.

Thank you!
Sign Petitions:

Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance https://form.jotform.com/260031040852038 Symbols of Identity and Belonging at City Hall: https://form.jotform.com/253548517960062 Enhance Civic Participation: https://form.jotform.com/253544303745153 Here4You Homeless Shelter Hotline: (408)-385-2400
Elizabeth Agramont-Justiniano
she/her/ella/GIRRLL!
My personal brand:
-Creativity
-Compassion
-Commitment
-Consistency
-Courage
-Community Centeredness
Artist/Creative
Expand TRUST in SJ! Mental Health Matters!
Political Ambassador, Afro UPRIS/Black Democratic Club of SCC: Black Lives and Black Permanency Matters! Chair Ad-Hoc Committee on Housing and Homelessness, SCCDP Choir+ Member of Urban Sanctuary
Build the Bench 2025 Cohort, Member of SVYD
Civic Leadership 2026 Cohort, Silicon Valley at Home
Housing Justice Advocate
Downtown Resident of District 3: St. James/Julian Neighborhood Values: Honesty, Kindness, Compassion, Courage, Justice "Democracy only works when we work for it. When we fight for it, when we demand it."~Stacey Abrams Thank you!
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Abigail McManus
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Alison George
Email
1 Address
2 Thursday, January 8, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Amanda Flores
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Angie Schertle
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Cathleen Trowbridge
Email
1 Address
2 Outlook
Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
From Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Date Thu 1/8/2026 12:18 PM
To Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Ul 5 attachments (3 MB)
Oscar-Ramirez.pdf; Pratima-Gupta.pdf; Millie-Lyons.pdf; Sandy-Perry.pdf; Rev-Dana-Bainbridge.pdf; Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas
City of San José | Office of the City Clerk
200 East Santa Clara St. - Tower 14th Fl.

San José, CA 95113-1905
Phone 408.535.1260| Fax 408.292.6207
[email protected]
*Memos, items, and attachments must be submitted to [email protected] before 12PM on the Thursday before the intended Rules meeting* Holidays may impact this schedule; revised deadlines will be noticed as applicable.

From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 12:25 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Your feedback is appreciated!
From: E A
Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 12:14 PM
To: District3 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Campos, Pamela <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; City Clerk < [email protected]> Subject: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
[External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more] Hello Mayor and City Councilmembers
Please see the below attachments of residents and workers in San Jose who support maintaining 30% AMI affordable housing as a requirement in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.

Thank you!
Sign Petitions:

Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance https://form.jotform.com/260031040852038 Symbols of Identity and Belonging at City Hall: https://form.jotform.com/253548517960062 Enhance Civic Participation: https://form.jotform.com/253544303745153 Here4You Homeless Shelter Hotline: (408)-385-2400
Elizabeth Agramont-Justiniano
she/her/ella/GIRRLL!
My personal brand:
-Creativity
-Compassion
-Commitment
-Consistency
-Courage
-Community Centeredness
Artist/Creative
Expand TRUST in SJ! Mental Health Matters!
Political Ambassador, Afro UPRIS/Black Democratic Club of SCC: Black Lives and Black Permanency Matters! Chair Ad-Hoc Committee on Housing and Homelessness, SCCDP Choir+ Member of Urban Sanctuary
Build the Bench 2025 Cohort, Member of SVYD
Civic Leadership 2026 Cohort, Silicon Valley at Home
Housing Justice Advocate
Downtown Resident of District 3: St. James/Julian Neighborhood Values: Honesty, Kindness, Compassion, Courage, Justice "Democracy only works when we work for it. When we fight for it, when we demand it."~Stacey Abrams Thank you!
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class iversity important intens, appreciates, and celebrates each Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Millie Lyons
Email
1 Address
2 Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Oscar Ramirez
Email
1 Address
2 Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series el in are at ales ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Pratima Gupta
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class iversity important intens, appreciates, and celebrates each sphoning of our ngis and resources and tempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Rev. Dana Bainbridge
Email
1 Address
2 Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class iversity important intens, appreciates, and celebrates each Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Sandy Perry
Email
1 Address
2 Outlook
Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
From Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Date Thu 1/8/2026 12:18 PM
To Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Ul 5 attachments (3 MB)
Lori-Katcher.pdf; Maria-de-los-Angeles-Veliz.pdf; lara-Langstaff.pdf; Martha-Beattie.pdf; Marissa-Martinez.pdf; Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas
City of San José | Office of the City Clerk
200 East Santa Clara St. - Tower 14th Fl.

San José, CA 95113-1905
Phone 408.535.1260| Fax 408.292.6207
[email protected]
*Memos, items, and attachments must be submitted to [email protected] before 12PM on the Thursday before the intended Rules meeting* Holidays may impact this schedule; revised deadlines will be noticed as applicable.

From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 12:25 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Your feedback is appreciated!
From: E A
Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 12:12 PM
To: District3 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Campos, Pamela <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; City Clerk < [email protected]> Subject: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
[External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more] Hello Mayor and City Councilmembers
Please see the below attachments of residents and workers in San Jose who support maintaining 30% AMI affordable housing as a requirement in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.

Thank you!
Sign Petitions:

Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance https://form.jotform.com/260031040852038 Symbols of Identity and Belonging at City Hall: https://form.jotform.com/253548517960062 Enhance Civic Participation: https://form.jotform.com/253544303745153 Here4You Homeless Shelter Hotline: (408)-385-2400
Elizabeth Agramont-Justiniano
she/her/ella/GIRRLL!
My personal brand:
-Creativity
-Compassion
-Commitment
-Consistency
-Courage
-Community Centeredness
Artist/Creative
Expand TRUST in SJ! Mental Health Matters!
Political Ambassador, Afro UPRIS/Black Democratic Club of SCC: Black Lives and Black Permanency Matters! Chair Ad-Hoc Committee on Housing and Homelessness, SCCDP Choir+ Member of Urban Sanctuary
Build the Bench 2025 Cohort, Member of SVYD
Civic Leadership 2026 Cohort, Silicon Valley at Home
Housing Justice Advocate
Downtown Resident of District 3: St. James/Julian Neighborhood Values: Honesty, Kindness, Compassion, Courage, Justice "Democracy only works when we work for it. When we fight for it, when we demand it."~Stacey Abrams Thank you!
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class iversity important intens, appreciates, and celebrates each Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name lara Langstaff
Email
1 Address
2 Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series el in are at ales ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Lori Katcher
Email
1 Address
2 Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Maria de los Angeles Veliz
Email
1 Address
2 Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series el in are at ales ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Marissa Martinez
Email
1 Address
2 Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series el in are at ales ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Martha Beattie
Email
1 Address
2 Outlook
Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
From Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Date Thu 1/8/2026 12:18 PM
To Agendadesk <[email protected]>
U 5 attachments (3 MB)
Frances-Hernandez.pdf; Janine-Briones.pdf; Jeffie-Khalsa.pdf; Katrina-Anderson.pdf; Karen-Reed.pdf; Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas
City of San José | Office of the City Clerk
200 East Santa Clara St. - Tower 14th Fl.

San José, CA 95113-1905
Phone 408.535.1260| Fax 408.292.6207
[email protected]
*Memos, items, and attachments must be submitted to [email protected] before 12PM on the Thursday before the intended Rules meeting* Holidays may impact this schedule; revised deadlines will be noticed as applicable.

From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 12:25 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Your feedback is appreciated!
From: E A
Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 12:11 PM
To: District3 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Campos, Pamela <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; City Clerk < [email protected]> Subject: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
[External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more] Hello Mayor and City Councilmembers
Please see the below attachments of residents and workers in San Jose who support maintaining 30% AMI affordable housing as a requirement in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.

Thank you
Sign Petitions:

Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance https://form.jotform.com/260031040852038 Symbols of Identity and Belonging at City Hall: https://form.jotform.com/253548517960062 Enhance Civic Participation: https://form.jotform.com/253544303745153 Here4You Homeless Shelter Hotline: (408)-385-2400
Elizabeth Agramont-Justiniano
she/her/ella/GIRRLL!
My personal brand:
-Creativity
-Compassion
-Commitment
-Consistency
-Courage
-Community Centeredness
Artist/Creative
Expand TRUST in SJ! Mental Health Matters!
Political Ambassador, Afro UPRIS/Black Democratic Club of SCC: Black Lives and Black Permanency Matters! Chair Ad-Hoc Committee on Housing and Homelessness, SCCDP Choir+ Member of Urban Sanctuary
Build the Bench 2025 Cohort, Member of SVYD
Civic Leadership 2026 Cohort, Silicon Valley at Home
Housing Justice Advocate
Downtown Resident of District 3: St. James/Julian Neighborhood Values: Honesty, Kindness, Compassion, Courage, Justice "Democracy only works when we work for it. When we fight for it, when we demand it."~Stacey Abrams Thank you!
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series el in are at ales ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Frances Hernandez
Email
1 Address
2 Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series el in are at ales ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Janine Briones
Email
1 Address
2 Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom none sentence time and eates ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Jeffie Khalsa
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series el in are at ales ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Karen Reed
Email
1 Address
2 Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Katrina Anderson
Email
1 Address
2 Outlook
Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
From Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Date Thu 1/8/2026 12:18 PM
To Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Ul 5 attachments (3 MB)
Elizabeth-Colorado.pdf; Carmen-Brammer.pdf; Folake-Phillips.pdf; Evelyn-Cervantes.pdf; Elizabeth-Gonzalez.pdf; Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas
City of San José | Office of the City Clerk
200 East Santa Clara St. - Tower 14th Fl.

San José, CA 95113-1905
Phone 408.535.1260| Fax 408.292.6207
[email protected]
*Memos, items, and attachments must be submitted to [email protected] before 12PM on the Thursday before the intended Rules meeting* Holidays may impact this schedule; revised deadlines will be noticed as applicable.

From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 12:25 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Your feedback is appreciated!
From: E A
Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 12:10 PM
To: District3 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Campos, Pamela <[email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
[External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more] Hello Mayor and City Councilmembers
Please see the below attachments of residents and workers in San Jose who support maintaining 30% AMI affordable housing as a requirement in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.

Thank you
Sign Petitions:

Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance https://form.jotform.com/260031040852038 Symbols of Identity and Belonging at City Hall: https://form.jotform.com/253548517960062 Enhance Civic Participation: https://form.jotform.com/253544303745153 Here4You Homeless Shelter Hotline: (408)-385-2400
Elizabeth Agramont-Justiniano
she/her/ella/GIRRLL!
My personal brand:
-Creativity
-Compassion
-Commitment
-Consistency
-Courage
-Community Centeredness
Artist/Creative
Expand TRUST in SJ! Mental Health Matters!
Political Ambassador, Afro UPRIS/Black Democratic Club of SCC: Black Lives and Black Permanency Matters! Chair Ad-Hoc Committee on Housing and Homelessness, SCCDP Choir+ Member of Urban Sanctuary
Build the Bench 2025 Cohort, Member of SVYD
Civic Leadership 2026 Cohort, Silicon Valley at Home
Housing Justice Advocate
Downtown Resident of District 3: St. James/Julian Neighborhood Values: Honesty, Kindness, Compassion, Courage, Justice "Democracy only works when we work for it. When we fight for it, when we demand it."~Stacey Abrams Thank you!
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Carmen Brammer
Email
1 Address
2 Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Elizabeth Colorado
Email
1 Address
2 Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Elizabeth Gonzalez
Email
1 Address
2 Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series el in are at ales ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Evelyn Cervantes
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series el in are at ales ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Folake Phillips
Email
1 Address
2 Outlook
Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
From Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Date Thu 1/8/2026 12:18 PM
To Agendadesk <[email protected]>
U 5 attachments (3 MB)
Andrea-Villegas.pdf; Ashley-Riley.pdf; Andrea-Fraume-Valencia.pdf; Ana-Jimenez.pdf; Allegra-Watson.pdf; Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas
City of San José | Office of the City Clerk
200 East Santa Clara St. - Tower 14th Fl.

San José, CA 95113-1905
Phone 408.535.1260 | Fax 408.292.6207
[email protected]
*Memos, items, and attachments must be submitted to [email protected] before 12PM on the Thursday before the intended Rules meeting* Holidays may impact this schedule; revised deadlines will be noticed as applicable.

From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 12:25 PM
To: Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> Subject: Fw: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Office of the City Clerk | City of San José
200 E. Santa Clara St., Tower 14th Floor
San Jose, CA 95113
Main: 408-535-1260
Fax: 408-292-6207
How is our service? Your feedback is appreciated!
Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 12:08 PM
To: District3 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <Rosemary. [email protected]>; Campos, Pamela <Pamela. [email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
[External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more] Hello Mayor and City Councilmembers
Please see the below attachments of residents and workers in San Jose who support maintaining 30% AMI affordable housing as a requirement in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.

Thank you!
Sign Petitions:

Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance https://form.jotform.com/260031040852038 Symbols of Identity and Belonging at City Hall: https://form.jotform.com/253548517960062 Enhance Civic Participation: https://form.jotform.com/253544303745153 Here4You Homeless Shelter Hotline: (408)-385-2400
Elizabeth Agramont-Justiniano
she/her/ella/GIRRLL!
My personal brand:
-Creativity
-Compassion
-Commitment
-Consistency
-Courage
-Community Centeredness
Artist/Creative
Expand TRUST in SJ! Mental Health Matters!
Political Ambassador, Afro UPRIS/Black Democratic Club of SCC: Black Lives and Black Permanency Matters! Chair Ad-Hoc Committee on Housing and Homelessness, SCCDP Choir+ Member of Urban Sanctuary
Build the Bench 2025 Cohort, Member of SVYD
Civic Leadership 2026 Cohort, Silicon Valley at Home
Housing Justice Advocate
Downtown Resident of District 3: St. James/Julian Neighborhood Values: Honesty, Kindness, Compassion, Courage, Justice "Democracy only works when we work for it. When we fight for it, when we demand it."~Stacey Abrams Thank you!
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series el in are at ales ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Allegra Watson
Email
1 Address
2 Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, Siphoning of our ngis and resources and tempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Ana Jimenez
Email
1 Address
2 Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Andrea Fraume Valencia
Email
1 Address
2 Wednesday, January 7, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Andrea Villegas
Email
1 Address
2 Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have Name Ashley Riley
Email
1 Address
2 Outlook
FW: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
From City Clerk < [email protected]>
Date Tue 1/6/2026 10:27 AM
To Agendadesk <[email protected]>
U 5 attachments (3 MB)
Mame-Lo.pdf; Nora-Larson.pdf; Victoria-Delacroix.pdf; Robert-Aguirre.pdf; Tyra-Judge.pdf; From: E A <
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2026 9:52 AM
To: District3 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Campos, Pamela <Pamela. [email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>; District 6<[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; District9 < [email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
[External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more] Hello Mayor and City Councilmembers
Please see the below attachments of residents and workers in San Jose who support maintaining 30% AMI affordable housing as a requirement in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.

Thank you!
-
Here4You Homeless Shelter Hotline: (408)-385-2400
Elizabeth Agramont-Justiniano
she/her/ella/GIRRLL!
My personal brand:
-Creativity
-Compassion
-Commitment
-Consistency
-Courage
-Community Centeredness
Artist/Creative
Expand TRUST in SJ! Mental Health Matters!
Political Ambassador, Afro UPRIS/Black Democratic Club of SCC: Black Lives and Black Permanency Matters!
Chair Ad-Hoc Committee on Housing and Homelessness, SCCDP Choir+ Member of Urban Sanctuary
Build the Bench 2025 Cohort, Member of SVYD
Civic Leadership 2026 Cohort, Silicon Valley at Home
Housing Justice Advocate
Downtown Resident of District 3: St. James/Julian Neighborhood Values: Honesty, Kindness, Compassion, Courage, Justice "Democracy only works when we work for it. When we fight for it, when we demand it."~Stacey Abrams
Thank you!
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Monday, January 5, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Mame Lo
Email
1 Address
2 Sunday, January 4, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class sphoning of our ngis and resources and tempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Nora Larson
Email
1 Address
2 Sunday, January 4, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class iversity important intens, appreciates, and celebrates each sphoning of our ngis and resources and tempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Robert Aguirre
Email
1 Address
2 Tuesday, January 6, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, Siphoning of our ngis and resources and tempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Tyra Judge
Email
1 Address
2 Monday, January 5, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Victoria Delacroix
Email
1 Address
2 Outlook
FW: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
From City Clerk < [email protected]>
Date Tue 1/6/2026 10:26 AM
To Agendadesk <[email protected]>
U 5 attachments (3 MB)
Kathryn-Hedges.pdf; Kelly-McAuley.pdf; Khalilah-Ramirez.pdf; Kim-Guptill.pdf; Kyren-Patrick.pdf; From: E A
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2026 9:51 AM
To: District3<[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan < [email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary < [email protected]›; Campos, Pamela <Pamela. [email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>; District 6<[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; District9 < [email protected]>; District 10 [email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
[External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more] Hello Mayor and City Councilmembers
Please see the below attachments of residents and workers in San Jose who support maintaining 30% AMI affordable housing as a requirement in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.

Thank you!
-
Here4You Homeless Shelter Hotline: (408)-385-2400
Elizabeth Agramont-Justiniano
she/her/ella/GIRRLL!
My personal brand:
-Creativity
-Compassion
-Commitment
-Consistency
-Courage
-Community Centeredness
Artist/Creative
Expand TRUST in SJ! Mental Health Matters!
Political Ambassador, Afro UPRIS/Black Democratic Club of SCC: Black Lives and Black Permanency Matters!
Chair Ad-Hoc Committee on Housing and Homelessness, SCCDP Choir+ Member of Urban Sanctuary
Build the Bench 2025 Cohort, Member of SVYD
Civic Leadership 2026 Cohort, Silicon Valley at Home
Housing Justice Advocate
Downtown Resident of District 3: St. James/Julian Neighborhood Values: Honesty, Kindness, Compassion, Courage, Justice "Democracy only works when we work for it. When we fight for it, when we demand it."~Stacey Abrams
Thank you!
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Sunday, January 4, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class iversity important intens, appreciates, and celebrates each Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Kathryn Hedges
Email
1 Address
2 Sunday, January 4, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class sphoning of our ngis and resources and tempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Kelly McAuley
Email
1 Address
2 Monday, January 5, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series el in are at ales ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Khalilah Ramirez
Email
1 Address
2 Sunday, January 4, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class iversity important intens, appreciates, and celebrates each Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Kim Guptill
Email
1 Address
2 Monday, January 5, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, Siphoning of our ngis and resources and tempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Kyren Patrick
Email
1 Address
2 Outlook
FW: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
From City Clerk < [email protected]>
Date Tue 1/6/2026 10:26 AM
To Agendadesk <[email protected]>
U 5 attachments (3 MB)
Ilseh-Busarelo.pdf; Jennette-Holzworth.pdf; Julia-Wong.pdf; Karen-Matsueda.pdf; Hector-Hernandez.pdf; From: E A
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2026 9:49 AI
To: District3 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Campos, Pamela <Pamela. [email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>; District 6<[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; District9 < [email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
[External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more] Hello Mayor and City Councilmembers
Please see the below attachments of residents and workers in San Jose who support maintaining 30% AMI affordable housing as a requirement in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.

Thank you!
Here4You Homeless Shelter Hotline: (408)-385-2400
Elizabeth Agramont-Justiniano
she/her/ella/GIRRLL!
My personal brand:
-Creativity
-Compassion
-Commitment
-Consistency
-Courage
-Community Centeredness
Artist/Creative
Expand TRUST in SJ! Mental Health Matters!
Political Ambassador, Afro UPRIS/Black Democratic Club of SCC: Black Lives and Black Permanency Matters!
Chair Ad-Hoc Committee on Housing and Homelessness, SCCDP Choir+ Member of Urban Sanctuary
Build the Bench 2025 Cohort, Member of SVYD
Civic Leadership 2026 Cohort, Silicon Valley at Home
Housing Justice Advocate
Downtown Resident of District 3: St. James/Julian Neighborhood Values: Honesty, Kindness, Compassion, Courage, Justice "Democracy only works when we work for it. When we fight for it, when we demand it."~Stacey Abrams
Thank you!
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Monday, January 5, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom none sentence time and eates ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Hector Hernandez
Email
1 Address CA
San Jose, San Jose, 95116
Monday, January 5, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class Siphoning of our ngis and rescues and tempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Ilseh Busarelo
Email
1 Address
2 Sunday, January 4, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Jennette Holzworth
Email
1 Address
2 Monday, January 5, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Julia Wong
Email
1 Address
2 Sunday, January 4, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class sphoning of our ngis and resources and tempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Karen Matsueda
Email
1 Address
2 Outlook
FW: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance!
From City Clerk < [email protected]>
Date Tue 1/6/2026 10:26 AM
To Agendadesk <[email protected]>
U 5 attachments (3 MB)
Elizabeth-Marquez-Bernardino.pdf; Dustin-Hunt.pdf; Dominic-Agudelo.pdf; Elizabeth-Agramont-Justiniano.pdf; Emma-Hartung.pdf;- From: EA
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2026 9:47 AM
To: District3 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Campos, Pamela <Pamela. [email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>; District 6<[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <Bien. <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; District9 < [email protected]>; District 10 [email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Protect the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance!
[External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more] Hello Mayor and City Councilmembers
Please see the below attachments of residents and workers in San Jose who support maintaining 30% AMI affordable housing as a requirement in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.

Thank you!
-
Here4You Homeless Shelter Hotline: (408)-385-2400
Elizabeth Agramont-Justiniano
she/her/ella/GIRRLL!
My personal brand:
-Creativity
-Compassion
-Commitment
-Consistency
-Courage
-Community Centeredness
Artist/Creative
Expand TRUST in SJ! Mental Health Matters!
Political Ambassador, Afro UPRIS/Black Democratic Club of SCC: Black Lives and Black Permanency Matters!
Chair Ad-Hoc Committee on Housing and Homelessness, SCCDP Choir+ Member of Urban Sanctuary
Build the Bench 2025 Cohort, Member of SVYD
Civic Leadership 2026 Cohort, Silicon Valley at Home
Housing Justice Advocate
Downtown Resident of District 3: St. James/Julian Neighborhood Values: Honesty, Kindness, Compassion, Courage, Justice "Democracy only works when we work for it. When we fight for it, when we demand it."~Stacey Abrams
Thank you!
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Monday, January 5, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Dominic Agudelo
Email
1 Address
2 Monday, January 5, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series el in are at ales ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Dustin Hunt
Email
1 Address
2 Sunday, January 4, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Elizabeth Agramont-Justiniano
Email
1 Address
2 Monday, January 5, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Elizabeth Marquez Bernardino
Email
1 Address
2 Sunday, January 4, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
-ELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Poor people to live in their neighborhood. Racial and Class diversity is important in fostering a community that learns, brom gone series el in are at ales ech
siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Emma Hartung
Email
1 Address
2 Outlook
FW: Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance!
From City Clerk < [email protected]>
Date Tue 1/6/2026 10:26 AM
To Agendadesk <[email protected]>
U 5 attachments (3 MB)
Anna-Lindley.pdf; Brandon-Tsao.pdf; Azazel-Holmlvist.pdf; Bill-Roth.pdf; Andrew-Siegler.pdf; From: E A
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2026 9:43 AM
To: District3 <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; The Office of Mayor Matt Mahan <[email protected]>; Kamei, Rosemary <[email protected]>; Campos, Pamela <Pamela. [email protected]>; Cohen, David <[email protected]>; Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>; District 6<[email protected]>; Doan, Bien <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]>; District9 < [email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance!
[External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more] Hello Mayor and City Councilmembers
Please see the below attachments of residents and workers in San Jose who support maintaining 30% AMI affordable housing as a requirement in the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance.

Thank you!
Here4You Homeless Shelter Hotline: (408)-385-2400
Elizabeth Agramont-Justiniano
she/her/ella/GIRRLL!
My personal brand:
-Creativity
-Compassion
-Commitment
-Consistency
-Courage
-Community Centeredness
Artist/Creative
Expand TRUST in SJ! Mental Health Matters!
Political Ambassador, Afro UPRIS/Black Democratic Club of SCC: Black Lives and Black Permanency Matters!
Chair Ad-Hoc Committee on Housing and Homelessness, SCCDP Choir+ Member of Urban Sanctuary
Build the Bench 2025 Cohort, Member of SVYD
Civic Leadership 2026 Cohort, Silicon Valley at Home
Housing Justice Advocate
Downtown Resident of District 3: St. James/Julian Neighborhood Values: Honesty, Kindness, Compassion, Courage, Justice "Democracy only works when we work for it. When we fight for it, when we demand it."~Stacey Abrams
Thank you!
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.

Sunday, January 4, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
LELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have Name Andrew Siegler
Email
1 Address
2 Monday, January 5, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
LELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Name Anna Lindley
Email
1 Address
2 Sunday, January 4, 2026
EVERYON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
LELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or Name Azazel Holmlvist
Email
1 Address
2 Monday, January 5, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
LELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or iversity important intens, apprecates, and celebrates each Name Bill Roth
Email
1 Address
2 Monday, January 5, 2026
EVERTON Protect Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
LELONGS Sign if you support: It is of the utmost importance that the City of San Jose not eliminate affordable housing at the 30% AMI from the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Meaning that folks who make 30% of the Average Median Income of $141K can
find apartments at their income level. Eliminating Very Low and Extremely Low income affordable housing construction
requirements within the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance would disproportionately negatively impact the Black community specifically in San Jose. Whereas, Black residents average median wealth is $24K and White residents it is $188K.

Whereas, the Black population represents 2.2% of the city residents yet 19% of those who are unhoused. Furthermore, segregation and redlining still persist in San Jose. Race exists still as a determining factor and predictor of life outcomes. On 11/8/2022, voters approved Measure amending the City
Charter in order to uplift the values and practices of racial and social equity, inclusion, and racial and social justice. Effective 5/14/2024 the City of San Jose enacted the Equity Values and Standards Policy RES2024-140. Under the section titled
Application it states: d. "Analyze how the program, polity, ordinance, or budget item might improve or worse racial and social equity." Consequences, of removing the ELl affordable housing requirement from the IHO include: increase in
homelessness for the poorest residents, poorer education outcomes, lack of opportunities and resources that would be provided in mixed income and higher resource areas. Due to persistent systemic racism in our society it is necessary for our government to provide protection and not be perpetrators of these injustices. The City of San Jose has a responsibility and needs to be held accountable to promote the wellbeing, safety, stability of its residents particularly those most oppressed.

Let's not forget the purpose of the Inclusionary Housing in direct response to Exclusionary Zoning practices. Due to wealthy White homeowners not wanting People of Color or belonging. With the current federal administration's active siphoning of our rights and resources and attempts to devalue Black, Latin(e/x), Asian, and Indigenous people, immigrants, poor people, people with disabilities, neurodivergence, and LGBTQIA+ people it is critically important that at the local City level you help protect our resources and rights so we can have equity and continue to advance. Thank You!
Name Brandon Tsao
Email
1 Address
2

← All documents from this meeting