City Council Meeting
Minutes
Tuesday, March 17, 2026
1:30 PM
Council Chambers
Closed Session at 9:30 a.m.
MATT MAHAN, MAYOR
ROSEMARY KAMEI, DISTRICT 1
PAMELA CAMPOS, DISTRICT 2
ANTHONY TORDILLOS, DISTRICT 3
DAVID COHEN, DISTRICT 4
PETER ORTIZ, DISTRICT 5
MICHAEL MULCAHY, DISTRICT 6
BIEN DOAN, DISTRICT 7
DOMINGO CANDELAS, DISTRICT 8
PAM FOLEY, VICE MAYOR, DISTRICT 9
GEORGE CASEY, DISTRICT 10
San José City Council March 17, 2026
• Call to Order and Roll Call
9:30 a.m.- Closed Session. Please see pages 13-16 for Closed Session Minutes.
Present Councilmembers: Foley, Candelas, Doan, Mulcahy, Ortiz, Tordillos, Campos.
Absent Councilmembers: Casey, Cohen, Kamei, Mahan.
1:34 p.m.- Regular Session.
Present Councilmembers: Mahan, Foley, Kamei, Campos, Tordillos, Cohen (arrived late), Ortiz, Doan, Candelas, Mulcahy, Casey.
A
bsent Councilmembers: All present.
• Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Matt Mahan led the Pledge of Allegiance.
• Invocation (District 3)
David Mulvehill, downtown stakeholder, offered the invocation with a speech. • Orders of the Day
None provided.
• Closed Session Report
Susana Alcala Wood, City Attorney, City Attorney's Office, reported that the items on the March 17, 2026 Closed Session Agenda were discussed by the Council, except all of Section B (Conference with Labor Negotiator Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6). Items 1 through 7 of Section B were taken off the agenda and were not heard.
1. CEREMONIAL ITEMS
1.1 Councilmember Domingo Candelas and Vice Mayor Pam Foley presented a proclamation recognizing March 21, 2026, as World Down Syndrome Day in the City of San José, aimed at helping people better understand and support individuals with Down syndrome.
San José City Council March 17, 2026
2. CONSENT CALENDAR
M
ayor Matt Mahan announced that public comment was limited to one minute for the remainder of the meeting, due to the high volume of speaker cards submitted.
Public Comment: None provided.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Bien Doan, seconded by Councilmember Rosemary Kamei, and carried unanimously, the Consent Calendar was approved as a whole. The actions below were taken as indicated. (10-0-1; Absent: Cohen)
2.1 A pproval of City Council Minutes.
(a) City Council Study Session Meeting Minutes of February 5, 2026. (b) Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of February 24, 2026. (c) Regular City Council Meeting Minutes of March 3, 2026.
CEQA: Not a Project, File No. PP17-009, Staff Reports, Assessments, Annual Reports, and Informational Memos that involve no approvals of any City action.
Action: The City Council minutes were approved. (10-0-1; Absent: Cohen)
2.2 Final Adoption of Ordinances.
N
one provided.
2.3 Approval of Council Committee Minutes.
(a) Regular Joint Meeting for the Rules and Open Government Committee Minutes of February 18, 2026.
(b) Regular Joint Meeting for the Rules and Open Government Committee Minutes of February 25, 2026.
(c) Regular Joint Meeting for the Rules and Open Government Committee Minutes of March 4, 2026.
CEQA: Not a Project, File No. PP17-009, Staff Reports, Assessments, Annual Reports, and Informational Memos that involve no approvals of any City action.
Action: The Council Committee minutes were approved. (10-0-1; Absent: Cohen)
2.4 Mayor and Council Excused Absence Requests.
Request for an excused absence for Councilmember Kamei from the regular meeting of Rules and Open Government Committee and Committee of the Whole on April 1, 2026, due to authorized City business to attend the Local Agency Formation Commission of Santa Clara County (Santa Clara LAFCO) meeting.
CEQA: Not a Project, File No. PP17-010, City Organizational and Administrative Activities resulting in no changes to the physical environment. (Kamei) [Rules Committee referral 3/11/2026 - Item A.1.a]
Action:
Councilmember Rosemary Kamei’s excused absence from the regular meeting of Rules and Open Government Committee and Committee of the Whole on April 1, 2026 was approved. (10-0-1;
Absent: Cohen)
San José City Council March 17, 2026
2.5 City Council Travel Reports.
None provided.
2.6 Report from the Council Liaison to the Retirement Boards.
None provided.
2.7 Setting a Public Hearing for the Cost of Sidewalk Repairs for June 2, 2026.
Adopt a resolution setting a public hearing on Tuesday, June 2, 2026, at 1:30 p.m. for the approval of the report from the Director of Finance for the cost of sidewalk repairs.
CEQA: Not a Project, File No. PP17-009, Staff reports, Assessments, Annual Reports, and Informational Memos that involve no approvals of any City action. (Finance) Action: R esolution No. RES2026-59 was adopted, setting a public hearing on Tuesday, June 2, 2026, at 1:30 p.m. for the approval of the report from the Director of Finance for the cost of sidewalk repairs. (10-0-1; Absent: Cohen)
2.8 Amendment with Episcopal Community Services of San Francisco for the Casa Linda Motel Program.
Adopt a resolution authorizing the Housing Director, or his designee, to negotiate and execute an amendment to the existing grant agreement with Episcopal Community Services of San Francisco for oversight and service provision at the Casa Linda Motel, increasing the agreement amount from $350,000 to a not-to-exceed amount of $599,184, retroactive to February 23, 2026, through June 30, 2026.
CEQA: Not a Project, File No. PP17-003, Agreements/Contracts (New or Amended) resulting in no physical changes to the environment.
Council District 7. (Housing)
Action: Resolution No. RES2026-60 was adopted, authorizing the Housing Director, or his designee, to negotiate and execute an amendment to the existing grant agreement with E piscopal Community Services of San Francisco for oversight and service provision at the Casa Linda Motel, increasing the agreement amount from $350,000 to a not-to- exceed amount of $599,184, retroactive to February 23, 2026, through June 30, 2026. (10-0-1; Absent: Cohen)
2.9 Amendment to the Soft Story Seismic Retrofit Ordinance.
Approve an ordinance amending the effective date of the Soft Story Seismic Retrofit Ordinance from April 1, 2026, to April 1, 2027, along with the compliance deadlines in San José Municipal Code section 17.41.550 which requires seismic retrofit of certain wood-frame target story residential buildings.
CEQA: Categorically Exempt, File No. ER23-173, CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities. (Planning, Building and Code Enforcement/Housing/City Manager) San José City Council March 17, 2026
Action: Ordinance No. 31315 was passed for publication, amending the effective date of the Soft Story Seismic Retrofit Ordinance from April 1, 2026, to April 1, 2027, along with the compliance deadlines in San José Municipal Code section 17.41.550 which requires seismic retrofit of certain wood-frame target story residential buildings. (10-0-1; Absent: Cohen)
2.10 Report on Bids and Award of Contract for the 10623 - 2026 Major Streets Remove and Replace Pavement Project.
(a) Report on bids and award of a contract for the construction of 10623 - 2026 Major Streets Remove and Replace Pavement Project, to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, O’Grady Paving, Inc., in the amount of $1,110,540; and (b) Approve a 10 % contingency in the amount of $111,054.
CEQA: Exempt, File No. ER24-313, CEQA Guidelines Section 15301(c), Existing Facilities. (Transportation)
Action: (a) The report on bids and award of a contract for the construction of 10623 - 2026 Major Streets Remove and Replace Pavement Project, to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, O’Grady Paving, Inc., in the amount of $1,110,540 was accepted; and (b) the 10 % contingency in the amount of $111,054 was approved. (10-0-1; A bsent: Cohen)
2.11 Approval of Asian American and Pacific Islander Month Festival 2026 Sponsored by Council Districts 1 and 3 as a City Council Sponsored Special Event to Expend City Funds and Accept Donations of Materials and Services for the Event.
As recommended by the Rules and Open Government Committee on March 11, 2026:
(a) Approve the Asian American and Pacific Islander Month Festival scheduled on May 13, 2026 as a City Council sponsored Special Event and approve the expenditure of funds; and
(b) Approve and accept donations from various individuals, businesses or community groups to support the event.
CEQA: Not a Project, File No. PP17-011, Temporary Special Events resulting in no changes to the physical environment. (Kamei and Tordillos) [Rules Committee referral 3/11/2026 - Item B.2]
Action: The Asian American and Pacific Islander Month Festival 2026, sponsored by Council Districts 1 and 3, was approved. (10-0-1; Absent: Cohen)
2.12 A pproval of the WEPA Salsa Festival Sponsored by Council District 1 as a City Council Sponsored Special Event to Expend City Funds and Accept Donations of Materials and Services for the Event.
As recommended by the Rules and Open Government Committee on March 11, 2026:
(c) Approve the WEPA Salsa Festival scheduled on June 12, 2026 as a City Council sponsored Special Event and approve the expenditure of funds; and (d) Approve and accept donations from various individuals, businesses, or community groups to support the event.
CEQA: Not a Project, File No. PP17-011, Temporary Special Events resulting in no changes to the physical environment. (Kamei)
San José City Council March 17, 2026
[Rules Committee referral 3/11/2026 - Item B.3]
Action: The WEPA Salsa Festival, sponsored by Council District 1, was approved. (10-0-1; Absent: Cohen)
2.13 A pproval of the Greek Flag Raising Sponsored by Council District 9 as a City Council Sponsored Special Event to Expend City Funds and Accept Donations of Materials and Services for the Event.
As recommended by the Rules and Open Government Committee on March 11, 2026:
2.13.1 Approve the Greek Flag Raising scheduled on March 25, 2026 as a City Council sponsored Special Event and approve the expenditure of funds; and
2.13.2 Approve and accept donations from various individuals, businesses, or community groups to support the event.
CEQA: Not a Project, File No. PP17-011, Temporary Special Events resulting in no changes to the physical environment. (Foley)
[Rules Committee referral 3/11/2026 - Item B.4]
Action:
The Greek Flag Raising event, sponsored by Council District 9, was approved. (10-0-1; Absent: Cohen)
2.14 Approval of Dumpster Days Sponsored by Council District 9 as City Council Sponsored Special Events to Expend City Funds and Accept Donations of Materials and Services for the Events.
As recommended by the Rules and Open Government Committee on March 11, 2026:
(a) Approve the Dumpster Days scheduled on March 28, June 13, August 8, and September 26, 2026 as City Council sponsored Special Events and approve the expenditure of funds; and
(b) Approve and accept donations from various individuals, businesses, or community groups to support the event.
CEQA: Not a Project, File No. PP17-011, Temporary Special Events resulting in no changes to the physical environment. (Foley)
[Rules Committee referral 3/11/2026 - Item B.5]
Action: The various Dumpster Days, sponsored by Council District 9, were approved. (10-0-1; Absent: Cohen)
2.15 A pproval of Autism Awareness Month Flag Raising Sponsored by Council District 6 as a City Council Sponsored Special Event to Expend City Funds and Accept Donations of Materials and Services for the Event.
As recommended by the Rules and Open Government Committee on March 11, 2026:
(a) Approve the Autism Awareness Month Flag Raising scheduled on April 17, 2026 as a City Council sponsored Special Event and approve the expenditure of funds; and (b) Approve and accept donations from various individuals, businesses, or community groups to support the event.
San José City Council March 17, 2026
CEQA: Not a Project, File No. PP17-011, Temporary Special Events resulting in no changes to the physical environment. (Mulcahy) [Rules Committee referral 3/11/2026 - Item B.6]
Action: The Autism Awareness Month Flag Raising event, sponsored by Council District 6, was approved. (10-0-1; Absent: Cohen)
3. STRATEGIC SUPPORT
3.1 Report of the City Manager, Jennifer Maguire (Verbal Report).
N
one provided.
3.2 Labor Negotiations Update.
N
one provided.
3.3 Approval of the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Mayor’s March Budget Message. - HEARD LAST
(a) Conduct a Public Hearing on the FY 2026-2027 Mayor’s March Budget Message. (b) Approve the FY 2026-2027 Mayor’s March Budget Message. CEQA: Not a Project, File No. PP17-010, City Organization and Administrative Activities resulting in no changes to the physical environment. (Mayor)
Mayor Matt Mahan outlined his proposed March Budget Message for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.
Mayor Matt Mahan announced that each public comment would be limited to forty-five seconds for the remainder of the meeting, due to over 150 speaker cards submitted for this item.
Public Comment: Anil Babbar, Ed Davis, Yesenia Campos, Leah Toeniskoetter, Cicille Madriga, Orliane M., Ziyang Fan (Silicon Valley Leadership Group), Eric Negomir (Silicon Valley Leadership Group), Larry Ames, Louis Powell, Larry Whitaker, Alan L., Linh Vu, Hong Cao, Sam Ho, Ranu Aggarwal, Felicia Martinez, Herb Bowen, Steve Gann, Nhut Ho, Tinh Cao, Gary Cooper, Sam Lum (Hamilton Place Neighborhood Association), Greg Koopman, Brian Kurtz, Mary Nguyen, Alicia Zamudio (Grail Family Services), Margie, Lisa Doyle, Veronica Goei (Grail Family Services), Alma Garcia, Cassandra Arenas (Grail Family Services), Elidia Venegas (Grail Family Services), Destiny Pena (Grail Family Services), Maria Del Sagriario Santana (Grail Family Services), Imelda Bueno (Grail Family Services), Issa Ajlouni, Linda Phillips, Jen Masuda, Milton Cadena, Georgia Bacil, Bao Trieu (VIVO), Tanya Payyappilly (Breathe California), Cassandra Majana, Jennifer K. Cloyd, Kimberly Woo, Huy Tran, Kathy Cordova, Ozel Kirkland, Eula Idemoto, Joe Nieto, Misrayan Mendoza, Marneli Canosa, Jeremy Barousse, Joanna Becerra, Kristin Link, Otokonable, Celia Patricia O’Shea, Lori, Sandy Perry, Alejandra Aguilar, Hector Hernandez, Lourdes Alvarez, Domingo Armendaiz, Deb St. Julien, Jeff Levine, Gabriel Manrique, Hoai An Truong, Linda Hutchins Knowles, Brenda Bell Brown, Carmen Martinez, Samantha Rojas, Ray Bramson, Diane Gaskill, Nigel Hansen, Bob Brownstein, David Burrows, Dmitriy San José City Council March 17, 2026
Kruglyak, Stephen M. Samuel, Danny Garza, Dave Peterson, Alison Cingolani, Helen Brock, Vasundra, Jeremiah Lineberger, Mary Ng, Kiaya Huff, Matthew Frazier, Briana Hernandez, Julissa M., Neil Valenzuela, Jonathan, Dan from D.10, Vicky Ramirez, Greg Peralta, Moigan Mahdizadeh, Dashiell Leeds, Jean Marie White, Dan Mountsier, Victor Vasquez, Stasha Leeds, Fred Brew, Victor Costa, Susan, Krista De La Torre, Rebecca Selden, Neil Park McClintick, Andrea Munoz, Antonina, Russ Baker, Luz Aguilar, Doris Garcia, Cesar Palancares, Ibrahim Diallo, David Noel, Alma Jacobo, Ellina, Ofisa Pati, Deo Agustin, Sean Baker, Karl Lee, Flor De Leon, Jonathan Francisco Borca, Gene Cook, Ashley Antonich Sarabia, Kylie Clark, Mateo Coulson, Mike Kraus, Neil Collins, Shirley Stager, Estevan Lopez, Fernando Hernandez, Huascar Castro, Gia Pham, Aurelia Sanchez, Valeria Carlos, Juan Carlos, Audry Quiroz, Sonal N., Joshal Phene, Nahu Hintsa, Dave Lujan, Eulalia, Joann Pascaul, Daphne Hernandez, Oscar Q. M., Michelle Ortega, and 16 speakers (names not provided at the podium), offered public testimony regarding the item.
C
ouncilmember Peter Ortiz requested that future motions include direction for the City Manager to consider and explore the allocation of funding to fully fund the Children and Youth Master Plan and fully fund the promised $500,000 to defend the immigrant community.
C
ity Manager, Jennifer Maguire, requested clarification on Councilmember Ortiz’ request to fully fund the Children and Youth Master Plan. She confirmed for the record they would consider up to $1 million dollars.
Motion: Councilmember Bi en Doan moved approval of the Mayor’s March 16, 2026 revised (supplemental) memorandum, recommending the following:
1.) A ccept the Mayor’s March Budget Message.
2.) Amend the Mayor’s March Budget Message to include Councilmember Campos’ memo dated 3/12/26, Councilmember Mulcahy’s memo dated 3/12/26, and the Councilmembers’ Campos, Candelas, Casey, Ortiz, and Doan group memo dated 3/13/26, with the modifications outlined in the Appendix. a.) In accordance with City Charter Section 1204, should any direction between the Mayor’s March Budget Message and these memos be substantially similar, the Mayor’s March Budget Message’s scope and wording of direction will take precedence.
3.) Accept Vice Mayor Foley’s memo dated 3/16/26.
4.) Strike the Ellis Act direction in the Mayor’s March Budget Message. (Please refer to Attachment A of the Minutes to view the full language of the Mayor’s revised memorandum including the Appendix referenced above) AND
Also including recommendation 40 (a, b, and c) of the March 13, 2026 joint memorandum co-authored by Councilmember Candelas, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Ortiz, Councilmember Doan, and Councilmember Casey, recommending the following:
Direct the City Manager:
a.) Utilize the City’s existing dashboard and financial tracking systems to identify and track City expenditures associated with homelessness-related services across departments and explore opportunities for cost recovery or shared funding—such as Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs), service agreements, or other appropriate mechanisms—where these services involve shared responsibilities with other jurisdictions or entities.
San José City Council March 17, 2026
i.) Use the collected data to inform future policy decisions, interjurisdictional discussions, ii.) and budget planning efforts aimed at protecting core City services and improving the City’s long term fiscal sustainability.
iii.) Identify the responsible jurisdiction, where feasible, for tracked expenditures, including whether financial responsibility rests with the City, County, State, Federal government or an external entity.7
b.) Improve transparency and fiscal oversight by ensuring this information is available for ongoing monitoring and usage.
c.) Direct the City Manager to prioritize negotiating an extension of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Union Pacific. Additionally, explore opportunities to develop similar MOUs with other jurisdictions or nongovernmental agencies with significant ownership of land in San José.
Councilmember Domingo Candelas seconded the motion.
Friendly Amendment: Councilmember Domingo Candelas made the following friendly amendments to be provided as an information memorandum from the City Manager's Office:
- I ntegrate 40 (a and b) of the March 13, 2026 joint memorandum co-authored by Councilmember Candelas, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Ortiz, Councilmember Doan, and Councilmember Casey, as part of the upcoming joint city and county meeting, and then report back via information memorandum on how that discussion went. - Direct the administration to explore the use of opioid settlement funds to fund aspects of the Children and Youth Services Master Plan, that meet eligibility requirements to increase the overall amount beyond 500,000 (including the funds that Councilmember Ortiz mentioned, as well as funds from the Rapid Response Network as part of that analysis); including exploring the use of supplemental funding for the Community Paramedicine Program (prioritized as taking precedence), but both being explored. - Including recommendations 12, 13, and 14 of the March 13, 2026 joint memorandum co- authored by Councilmember Candelas, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Ortiz, Councilmember Doan, and Councilmember Casey, stating the following:
12.) Explore additional modernization to Code Enforcement focused on improving case resolution timelines and strengthen accountability for chronically non-compliant properties.
The proposal should include clearer escalation protocols, expanded use of cost-recovery tools such as administrative penalties and abatement liens, and improved reporting on time- to-resolution for major blight cases. Expected outcome is a more effective and financially sustainable enforcement program that improves neighborhood quality while reducing the General Fund burden of enforcement activities.
13.) Explore policy options for requiring rental properties with repeat substantiated code violations or significant repair needs to prepare Rental Tenant Habitability Plans.
14.) Explore a pilot Code Enforcement Outreach Program that provides grants for partnerships between community-based organizations, public interest legal groups, and the Department of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement.
- Including the prioritization of recommendations 28 and 29 of the March 13, 2026 joint memorandum co-authored by Councilmember Candelas, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Ortiz, Councilmember Doan, and Councilmember Casey, recommending the following:
San José City Council March 17, 2026
28. Introduce a new “problem s tatement” in the Growing Our Economy Focus Area related to accessing affordable childcare.
29. Provide alternative options to sustain the Family, Friends, and Neighbors (FFN) Caregiver Support Network, recognizing that FFNs not only allow parents and guardians to work but also themselves are small business operators.
The friendly amendment was accepted by the maker of the motion.
Substitute Motion: Vice Mayor Pam Foley moved approval of the Mayor’s March 16, 2026 revised memorandum, recommending the following:
1.) A ccept the Mayor’s March Budget Message.
2.) Amend the Mayor’s March Budget Message to include Councilmember Campos’ memo dated 3/12/26, Councilmember Mulcahy’s memo dated 3/12/26, and the Councilmembers’ Campos, Candelas, Casey, Ortiz, and Doan group memo dated 3/13/26, with the modifications outlined in the Appendix. a.) In accordance with City Charter Section 1204, should any direction between the Mayor’s March Budget Message and these memos be substantially similar, the Mayor’s March Budget Message’s scope and wording of direction will take precedence.
3.) Accept Vice Mayor Foley’s memo dated 3/16/26.
4.) Strike the Ellis Act direction in the Mayor’s March Budget Message. -Which includes the Appendix that was included within the body of the Mayor’s March 16,2026 revised memorandum
(Please refer to Attachment A of the Minutes to view the full language of the Mayor’s revised memorandum including the Appendix referenced above) Councilmember Rosemary Kamei seconded the substitute motion.
Friendly Amendment: Councilmember David Cohen requested that the substitute motion include the following friendly amendment:
Direct the City Manager's Office to explore the use of opioid settlement funds to fund asp
ects of the Children and Youth Services Master Plan, including prioritizing the exploration of the use of supplemental funding for the Community Paramedicine Program (which is prioritized as taking precedence for those funds).
The maker of the substitute motion and seconder accepted the friendly amendment.
Action: Upon motion by Vice Mayor Pam Foley and seconded by Councilmember Rosemary Kamei, the substitute motion carried, the Public Hearing on the FY 2026-2027 Mayor’s March Budget Message was conducted, and the Mayor’s March 16, 2026 revised memorandum was approved, recommending the following:
1.) A
ccept the Mayor’s March Budget Message.
2.) Amend the Mayor’s March Budget Message to include Councilmember Campos’ memo dated 3/12/26, Councilmember Mulcahy’s memo dated 3/12/26, and the Councilmembers’ Campos, Candelas, Casey, Ortiz, and Doan group memo dated 3/13/26, with the modifications outlined in the Appendix. a.) In accordance with City Charter Section 1204, should any direction between the Mayor’s March Budget Message and these memos be substantially similar, the Mayor’s March Budget Message’s scope and wording of direction will take precedence.
San José City Council March 17, 2026
3.) Accept Vice Mayor Foley’s memo dated 3/16/26.
4.) Strike the Ellis Act direction in the Mayor’s March Budget Message. -Also including the Appendix that was included within the body of the Mayor’s March 16,2026 revised memorandum.
(Please refer to Attachment A of the Minutes to view the full language of the Mayor’s revised memorandum including the Appendix referenced above) INCLUDING direction for the City Manager's Office to explore the use of opioid settlement funds to fund aspects of the Children and Youth Services Master Plan, including prioritizing the exploration of the use of supplemental funding for the Community Paramedicine Program (which is prioritized as taking precedence for those funds). (8-3-0; Noes: Doan, Candelas, Campos)
3.4 Childcare Policy Opportunities Status Report.
As recommended by the Neighborhood Services and Education Committee on February 12, 2026, accept the status report on potential opportunities for the City to improve the provision of childcare to its residents.
CEQA: Not a Project, File No. PP17-009, Staff Reports, Assessments, Annual Reports, and Informational Memos that involve no approvals of any City action. (City Manager) [Neighborhood Services and Education Committee referral 2/12/2026 - Item (d)3] Peter Hamilton, Assistant to the City Manager, City Manager's Office, offered the presentation and responded to questions.
Public Comment: None provided.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Pamela Campos, seconded by Councilmember Bien Doan, and carried unanimously, the status report on potential opportunities for the City to improve the provision of childcare to its residents was accepted. (11-0-0) San José City Council March 17, 2026
4. PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES
None provided.
5. TRANSPORTATION & AVIATION SERVICES
None provided.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL & UTILITY SERVICES
None provided.
7. NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
None provided.
8. COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
None provided.
9. REDEVELOPMENT – SUCCESSOR AGENCY
None provided.
San José City Council March 17, 2026
10. LAND USE
10.1 Land Use on Consent Calendar
No Land Use items on Consent Calendar.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
10 Land Use - Regular Agenda
10.2 PP25-006 - Amendment to Title 20 (Zoning Code) to Add Senate Bill 79 I
ndustrial Ordinance.
Approve an ordinance amending Title 20 (Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Code) of the San José Municipal Code to add new Chapter 20.197, Local Implementation of State Law, that includes Part 2, Senate Bill 79 Implementation for implementation of Senate Bill 79 and exclusion of certain employment areas designated in the City’s General Plan from Senate Bill 79 provisions, and to make other technical, non-substantive, or formatting changes within related sections of Title 20 of the San José Municipal Code.
CEQA: Not a Project under CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(1), CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5), and California Government Code Section 65912.160(c)(2)(SB 79). Planning Commission recommends approval (10-0-1; Cantrell absent) (Item 5.c on the 3/11/2026 Planning Commission agenda). (Planning, Building and Code Enforcement)
Mayor Matt Mahan announced that the presentations and public comments for Items 10.2 and 10.3 would be heard together, but a separate vote would be taken for each item.
C
hris Burton, Director, Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement (PBCE); Manira Sandhir, Deputy Director, PBCE; Jerad Ferguson, Principal Planner, PBCE; and Dana Peak, Principal Planner, PBCE, offered the presentation and responded to questions for Items 10.2 and 10.3
Public Comment: Brent Van Brocklin (VTA), Triana Crighton (VTA), Ben Leech (PAC SJ), Jimi Kogura, Roland Lebrun, Mary Ng (Opportunities for Change), and Mike Sodergren (PAC SJ), provided public testimony for Items 10.2 and 10.3.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember David Cohen, seconded by Councilmember Rosemary Kamei, and carried unanimously, Ordinance No. 31316 was passed for publication, amending Title 20 (Zoning Ordinance or Zoning Code) of the San José Municipal Code to add new Chapter 20.197 and to make other technical, non-substantive, or formatting changes within related sections of Title 20 of the San José Municipal Code. (11-0-0)
San José City Council March 17, 2026
10.3 Analysis on Senate Bill 79/Assembly Bill 130 and Historic Resources and Policy Recommendations.
(a) Consider analysis on the impact of Senate Bill 79 and Assembly Bill 130 on the City’s historic resources.
(b) Direct staff to return to City Council with a draft ordinance adding a definition for “demolition” for historic resources applicable to Assembly Bill 130 projects in Title 20 (Zoning Ordinance) of the San José Municipal Code.
CEQA: Not a Project, File No. PP17-007, Preliminary direction to staff and eventual action requires approval from decision-making body. (Planning, Building and Code Enforcement) Chris Burton, Director, Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement (PBCE); Manira Sandhir, Deputy Director, PBCE; Jerad Ferguson, Principal Planner, PBCE; and Dana Peak, Principal Planner, PBCE, offered the presentation and responded to questions for Items 10.2 and 10.3
Public Comment: Brent Van Brocklin (VTA), Triana Crighton (VTA), Ben Leech (PAC SJ), Jimi Kogura, Roland Lebrun, Mary Ng (Opportunities for Change), and Mike Sodergren (PAC SJ), provided public testimony for Items 10.2 and 10.3.
Motion: Councilmember Michael Mulcahy moved approval of his March 12, 2026 memorandum.
Councilmember Peter Ortiz seconded the motion.
Substitute Motion: Councilmember Anthony Tordillos moved approval of the March 13, 2026 joint memorandum he co-authored with Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Cohen, and Councilmember Kamei. Councilmember Rosemary Kamei seconded the substitute motion.
M
ayor Matt Mahan announced that the Council would vote on the substitute motion.
Action: Upon motion by Councilmember Anthony Tordillos, and seconded by Councilmember Rosemary Kamei, the substitute motion carried; (a) the analysis on the impact of Senate Bill 79 and Assembly Bill 130 on the City’s historic resources was considered; and (b) staff was directed to return to City Council with a draft ordinance adding a definition for “demolition” for historic resources applicable to Assembly Bill 130 projects in Title 20 (Zoning Ordinance) of the San José Municipal Code.
AND
I
ncluding approval of the March 13, 2026 joint memorandum co-authored by Councilmember Tordillos, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Cohen, and Councilmember Kamei, recommending the following:
1.) Approve staff recommendation.
2.) Direct the City Manager’s Office to conduct a workload analysis for a new historic resources survey, with a focus on TOD areas within the pre-World War 2 boundaries of the City.
3.) Decline to move forward with a delayed effectuation ordinance. (10-1-0; Noes: Mulcahy)
San José City Council March 17, 2026
Open Forum
No public comment provided.
Adjournment
The Council of the City of San José adjourned the meeting at 8:10 p.m.
Minutes Recorded, Prepared, and Respectfully Submitted by, Yasmi
n Johnson,
Deputy City Clerk City of San José
Approved at Council on: 4/7/2026
# of Actions: 5
Toni Taber, MMC
City Clerk, City of San José
• Notice of City Engineer's Pending Decision on Final Maps FOR RECEIPT:
Tract: 10684
Location: E/S of Roberts Avenue, 1,000 feet south of Story Road District: 7
Lots/Units: 8/8 Type:
SFD
Developer: Roberts Avenue Associates
• The full language of the Mayor’s March 16, 2026 revised memorandum, including the Appendix, referenced in the action for Item 3.3, is listed as Attachment A on pages 20-35 below.
San José City Council March 17, 2026
S
AN JOSÉ CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION MINUTES
March 17, 2026
Present Councilmembers: Foley, Candelas, Doan, Mulcahy, Ortiz, Tordillos, Campos.
A
bsent Councilmembers: Casey, Cohen, Kamei, Mahan.
Pl
ace: City Hall, Conference Room W-133
T
ime: 9:30 a.m.
CLO
SED SESSION ITEM(S) DISCUSSED:
A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(d)(1):
1. Case Name: In r e: Claim of Van Dalen
Name(s) of Party(ies):
Court: Worker’s Compensation Appeals Court
Case No: ADJ18610449, ADJ15402852, ADJ13108069
Amount of Money or
Other Relief Sought:
Benefits
2. Case Name: In re: Claim of Biakanja
Name(s) of Party(ies):
Court: Worker’s Compensation Appeals Court
Case No: ADJ19660318
Amount of Money or
Other Relief Sought:
Benefits
3. Case Name: Gradetech Inc. v. City of San Jose, et al.
San José City Council March 17, 2026
Name(s) of Party(ies): GRADETECH, INC.; CITY OF SAN JOSE Court: Santa Clara County Superior Court
Case No: 18cv325319
Amount of Money or Other
Relief Sought:
Damages according to proof
B. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6:
City Negotiator: Aram Kouyoumdjian, Director of Employee Relations Employee Organizations:
1. Organization or Name
and Title of
Unrepresented
Employees:
Association of Building, Mechanical and
Electrical Inspectors (ABMEI)
Nature of negotiations: wages/salaries, hours, working conditions, etc.
Name of Existing
Contract or MOA:
Memorandum of Agreement – City of San José and
Association of Building, Mechanical and Electrical
Inspectors (ABMEI)
How to Obtain a copy of
Existing Contract or
MOA:
Web: https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-
government/departments-offices/office-of-the-city-
manager/employee-relations/labor-relations-
information/bargaining-units-labor-contract-
info/abmei
Telephone – Employee Relations: (408) 535- 8150
2. Organization or Name
and Title of
Unrepresented
Employees:
Association of Engineers & Architects (AEA)
Nature of negotiations: wages/salaries, hours, working conditions, etc.
Name of Existing
Contract or MOA:
Memorandum of Agreement — City of San José
and Association of Engineers & Architects (AEA)
How to Obtain a copy of
Existing Contract or
MOA:
Web: https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-
government/departments-offices/office-of-the-city-
manager/employee-relations/labor-relations-
information/bargaining-units-labor-contract-info/aea
Telephone – Employee Relations: (408) 535-8150
3. Organization or Name
and Title of
Unrepresented
Employees:
Association of Legal Professionals of San José
(ALP)
San José City Coun
cil
Nature of negotiations: wages/salaries, hours, working con diti onMs,aertcch. 17, 2026 Name of Existing
Contract or MOA:
Memorandum of Agreement – City of San José and
Association of Legal Professionals of San José
How to Obtain a copy of
Existing Contract or
MOA:
Web: https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-
government/departments-offices/office-of-the-city-
manager/employee-relations/labor-relations-
information/bargaining-units-labor-contract-info/alp
Telephone – Employee Relations: (408) 535- 8150
4. Organization or Name
and Title of
Unrepresented
Employees:
Association of Maintenance Supervisory
Personnel (AMSP)
Nature of negotiations: wages/salaries, hours, working conditions, etc.
Name of Existing
Contract or MOA:
City of San José - Association of Maintenance
Supervisory Personnel (AMSP) Benefit &
Compensation Summary
How to Obtain a copy of
Existing Contract or
MOA:
Web: https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-
government/departments-offices/office-of-the-city-
manager/employee-relations/labor-relations-
information/bargaining-units-labor-contract-
info/amsp
Telephone – Employee Relations: (408) 535- 8150
5. Organization or Name
and Title of
Unrepresented
Employees:
City Association of Management Personnel
Agreement (CAMP)
Nature of negotiations: wages/salaries, hours, working conditions, etc.
Name of Existing
Contract or MOA:
Benefit & Compensation Summary — City of San
José and City Association of Management Personnel
Agreement
How to Obtain a copy of
Existing Contract or
MOA:
Web: https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-
government/departments-offices/office-of-the-city-
manager/employee-relations/labor-relations-
information/bargaining-units-labor-contract-
info/camp
Telephone – Employee Relations: (408) 535- 8150
6. Organization or Name
and Title of
Unrepresented
Employees:
Municipal Employees’ Federation, AFSCME
Local 101, AFL-CIO (MEF)
San José City Coun 6
cil
Nature of negotiations: wages/salaries, hours, working con diti onMs,aertcch. 17, 202 Name of Existing
Contract or MOA:
Memorandum of Agreement — City of San José
and Municipal Employees’ Federation, AFSCME
Local 101, AFL-CIO
How to Obtain a copy of
Existing Contract or
MOA:
Web: https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-
government/departments-offices/office-of-the-city-
manager/employee-relations/labor-relations-
information/bargaining-units-labor-contract-
info/mef
Telephone – Employee Relations: (408) 535- 8150
7. Organization or Name
and Title of
Unrepresented
Employees:
San José Police Dispatchers’ Association
(SJPDA)
Nature of negotiations: wages/salaries, hours, working conditions, etc.
Name of Existing
Contract or MOA:
Memorandum of Agreement – City of San Jose and
Municipal Employees’ Federation (MEF),
AFSCME, Local 101
How to Obtain a copy of
Existing Contract or
MOA:
Web: https://www.sanjoseca.gov/your-
government/departments-offices/office-of-the-city-
manager/employee-relations/labor-relations-
information/bargaining-units-labor-contract-
info/sjpda
Telephone – Employee Relations: (408) 535-8150
San José City Council March 17, 2026
A
TTACHMENT A
1
A
TTACHMENT A
RE
COMMENDATIONS
COUNCIL AGENDA: 3/17/2026
FILE: 26-251
ITEM: 3.3
Memorandum
1) A
ccept the Mayor’s March Budget Message.
2) Amend the Mayor’s March Budget Message to include Councilmember Campos’ memo dated 3/12/26, Councilmember Mulcahy’s memo dated 3/12/26, and the Councilmembers’ Campos, Candelas, Casey, Ortiz, and Doan group memo dated 3/13/26, with the modifications outlined in the Appendix.
a) In accordance with City Charter Section 1204, should any direction between the Mayor’s March Budget Message and these memos be substantially similar, the Mayor’s March Budget Message’s scope and wording of direction will take precedence.
3) Accept Vice Mayor Foley’s memo dated 3/16/26.
4) Strike the Ellis Act direction in the Mayor’s March Budget Message.
BA
CKGROUND
The Annual Budget Process is one of the most important responsibilities we undertake as a City Council. This upcoming Fiscal Year, our City faces the largest shortfall in recent memory of $56 million as revenue growth slows and our costs continue to rise. This challenging moment calls for collaboration and an honest assessment of the resources we have available to serve our residents.
TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: Mayor Matt Mahan
SUBJECT: MARCH BUDGET
MESSAGE
RECONCILIATION
FOR FISCAL YEAR
2026-2027
DATE: March 16, 2026
APPROVED:
I am thankful for the thoughtful partnership of Vice Mayor Foley and Councilmembers Cohen, Kamei, and Tordillos, who comprised my Brown Act group this year. Their clearly expressed priorities and ideation for the Mayor’s March Budget Message (MMBM) set the tone for a year of continued focus and progress.
I also want to recognize the work of the other members of the City Council who put forward detailed memos with far-reaching proposals. I especially appreciate that the proposals fell within our Five Focus Areas, reflecting our unanimous agreement on the priorities for investment that will have the greatest impact for our community. However, it is important to acknowledge that these memos contained limited to no proposals for cost-saving or revenue-generating measures relative to the amount of new or additive work suggested. The fiscal reality that we face requires us to make difficult trade-offs and service reductions.
Section 1204 of the City of San José’s charter instructs the Mayor to lead the budget process via the MMBM. The section reads:
*****
SECTION 1204. Fiscal Administration; Submission of Budget and Budget Message. ● (
a) Each Council Appointee shall submit to the Mayor and the Council annually the budget request, for the ensuing fiscal year, of each City department, office or agency under their administration.
● (b) The Mayor shall deliver a budget message which shall include:
○ A statement of the fiscal priorities which the City should adopt for the ensuing year.
○ Which Departments, Offices or Agencies the Mayor proposes to be expanded or to receive reduced budgeted allocations.
○ Specific recommendations concerning any proposed additions to or deletions from the budget.
*****
The MMBM has historically played a critical role in fulfilling this obligation by setting a clear slate of intentional policy recommendations for the City Manager to consider while developing the proposed budget. The City Manager plays a vital role in the budget process by providing actionable information for the City Council and general public to consider, and ultimately empowers the City Council to vote on a balanced budget in June.
In ev
ery budget process, there exists a natural tension; this is currently exacerbated by our $56 million shortfall that will necessarily lead to difficult reductions in services. This tension involves striking the right balance of City Council direction and restraint if we are to have a high-quality proposed budget, accompanied by in-depth policy recommendations from our departmental subject matter experts. Additionally, success requires that the City Manager be given space to exercise her authority and judgment as she develops a proposed budget for our nearly 7,000 employees and 19 departments she oversees on a daily basis. 2 3
If we fail to achieve this delicate balance, there will be several negative impacts to the City and our residents:
● S
taff time will be wasted on proposals that we can not accomplish in the short term, stretching our limited workforce capacity on unproductive efforts that divert them from driving existing workplan items.
● The City Council will set false expectations with our community that we can add new programs without cutting existing and basic services. Newly established programs launched under this paradigm will fall short of making a significant impact because they lie outside of the City’s natural comparative service delivery advantage, and other agencies are better suited to performing and scaling this work. ● The City Council will lack critical, up-to-date, and actionable information that will empower it to make the difficult tradeoffs required in June in an informed manner. ● Our final approved budget will not be the most optimized and finely-tuned document, which will in turn mean public dollars do not go as far as they potentially could, progress stalls or worse, declines, and we lose public trust.
○ It is important to note that public trust has strengthened significantly in recent years, gaining nearly 40% “trust in City Hall” in under four years. We must ensure the FY 2026-2027 March Budget Message continues to build upon this momentum, which has been driven by focus.
S
ection 1205 of our City Charter mandates we deliver an annual balanced budget, but responsible management of public funds goes far beyond that baseline mandate. By approving this memo, we will pass an MMBM that incorporates ideas from all City Council Offices.
O
ur office worked alongside our Budget Brown Act and the City Manager to carefully evaluate each of the unprecedented 62 proposals identified across the three memos. The Appendix reflects this analysis, itemizing each recommendation by the memorandum author, memorandum publishing date, recommendation number, recommendation disposition, and additional commentary or direction.
T
he Appendix is organized in the following categories:
● Integrated into the Mayor’s March Budget Message
○ Exists in the MMBM
■ This direction is already reflected in the MMBM and does not require additional action.
○ Within Existing Workplan/Imminent Council Report
4
■ This direction is already underway through an existing staff workplan, previously adopted City Council direction, or an imminent City Council report. Additional direction in the MMBM is not necessary at this time. ○ New But Aligned
■ This direction is not expressly included in the MMBM, but it is consistent with its priorities and can be incorporated without materially expanding staff scope or creating a new body of work.
○ Amended language
■ This direction has been amended and incorporated into the MMBM. The amended and final language is bolded and can be found in the Additional Commentary section of the Appendix.
● Partially integrated into the Mayor’s March Budget Message ○ Worthwhile focus, but too prescriptive and interferes with means and methods ■ This direction may have conceptual merit but focuses too heavily on the exact method of execution, which infringes on the ability of the City Manager to exercise her authority over the means and methods in which Council Direction is fulfilled.
○ Existing relevant MBA, topic eligible for consideration ■ This direction speaks to an MBA that is planned to be released in this budget cycle, and staff should consider and address this direction as part of that MBA.
○ Amended language
■ This direction has been amended and incorporated into the MMBM. The amended and final language is bolded and can be found in the Additional Commentary section of the Appendix.
● Not integrated into the Mayor’s March Budget Message
○ June Budget Document Proposal
■ This direction is best suited for the June Budget Message process as it is a smaller scale and/or district-specific budget action
○ Other Jurisdiction’s Purview
■ This direction is not solely or primarily within the City’s purview of core services and standard service offerings, and due to the current shortfall cannot be explored at this time.
○ Lack of Resources/Capacity
■ Th
is direction requires a level of funding or staff capacity that is unavailable or will detract from other important ongoing work ○ To be Discussed Next FY
■ This direction should be discussed next Fiscal Year as the issues are best suited to be handled then.
○ Limited Authority and Scope
■ This direction addresses an issue that the City has limited legislative or delegated authority, and/or the problem or issue is inadequately scoped to provide clear direction to staff
C
ertain recommendations will contain “Additional Commentary” fields to include any issue-specific context to aid the City Council and the general public in understanding how the Administration can approach the direction.
5 Appendix
Memorandum
Author
Date of
Release Rec. #
Recommendation
(Integration, Partial
Integration, No
Integration) Justification Additional Commentary
Campos 3/12/2026 1 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Exists in the MMBM,
Amended Language
This direction aligns with previous Council direction regarding the long-term plan for our interim housing system, the City's application for State funds for this site, and direction in the FY 26-27 March Budget Message. As with any interim site, our ability to convert 1 Branham Lane to permanent housing will be largely determined by potential partners' willingness and financial capacity to acquire and maintain the site. Direct the City Manager to explore pursuing the actions necessary to convert the 1 Branham Lane Emergency Interim Housing Community into permanent housing.
Campos 3/12/2026 2 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Amended Language Direct the City Manager to explore pursuing a preference for individuals with disabilities and for individuals age 55 or older during the transition period.
Campos 3/12/2026 3 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
New But Aligned,
Amended Language
Direct the City Manager to release an informational memorandum on the status of the transition at 1 Branham before the end of the calendar year.
Mulcahy 3/12/2026 1 (SJ311
Modernization)
Partially integrated into
the Mayor’s March Budget
Message
"Worthwhile focus, too
prescriptive and interferes
with means and methods"
We appreciate Councilmember Mulcahy's reaffirmation of direction from the FY 25-26 MMBM. This work stream is being addressed by ongoing 311 improvements efforts within the City Manager's Driving Organization Performance and Customer Experience Workplan.
Mulcahy 3/12/2026 2 (SJ311
Common
Tools)
Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
To Be Discussed Next FY As the 311 improvements outlined in the Driving Organization Performance and Customer Experience Workplan progress and the overall 311 system improves, then these categories should be considered for addition to the platform. We should be mindful of ensuring reliable service delivery prior to committing to further additions.
Mulcahy 3/12/2026 3 (Universal
SJ311
Accounts)
Partially integrated into
the Mayor’s March Budget
Message
"Worthwhile focus, too
prescriptive and interferes
with means and methods"
As the City Manager implements the Driving Organization Performance and Customer Experience Workplan, the City Manager is directed to determine if existing reporting pathways have gaps and if SJ311 could serve as the best platform to report issues outside normal operations for the betterment of the overall state of the city. It is a worthwhile exercise to ensure all City staff understand how to use SJ311 as staff capacity allows. 1 Appendix
Mulcahy 3/12/2026 4 (City Hall
Campus
Improvements)
Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Lack of
Resources/Capacity
We agree that there are many improvements that can be made to make City Hall a more welcoming and functional space for our workforce. However, given budget constraints, urgent infrastructure needs must take precedence. We encourage the City Manager to explore what is possible and activate the City Hall Plaza, if resources allow.
Mulcahy 3/12/2026 5 (Park
Restroom
Maintenance)
Integrated into the
M
ayor’s March Budget
Message
Exists in the MMBM
Mulcahy 3/12/2026 6 (MRG and
Bramhall Park
Staffing)
Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
June BD Proposal The MRG pilot was funded through a Budget Document (BD) last year. Given the budget deficit, this specific individual expenditure request is better suited to come as a proposal through the BD process.
Mulcahy 3/12/2026 7 (Caltrans
DMA)
Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Within Existing
Workplan/Imminent
Council Report
We share Councilmember Mulcahy's desire to improve coordination with our external partners.
Mulcahy 3/12/2026 8 (Blight
Education)
Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
June BD Proposal Given the budget deficit, this specific individual expenditure request is better suited to come as a proposal through the Budget Document process.
Mulcahy 3/12/2026 9 (TOT
Allocation)
Partially integrated into
the Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Amended Language The City Manager is directed to evaluate opportunities to improve the efficiency of arts and cultural grants with existing resources. Any spending decisions related to TOT-supported programs should be made following the June Election, when Council can consider potential uses of additional revenue.
Mulcahy 3/12/2026 10 (SJC
Regional
Coordination)
Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Exists in the MMBM
Mulcahy 3/12/2026 11 (Major
Events)
Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Exists in the MMBM
Mulcahy 3/12/2026 12 (SJC
Adjacent
Parcel
Evaluation)
Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Within Existing
Workplan/Imminent
Council Report
This work is being coordinated within the City Council Growing Our Economy Focus Area and updates will be provided during Focus Area Status Reports. 2 Appendix
3
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 1 Integrated into the
M
ayor’s March Budget
Message
Exists in the MMBM The City Manager is directed to develop the MBA outlined in the March Budget Message focused on a framework for the City Council Focus Areas and outline where pending policy considerations may be reprioritized within the Focus Areas.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 2 Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
To Be Discussed Next FY The March Budget Message provides direction to preserve funds for homelessness prevention work, which is essential and should remain part of the broader conversation as the City evaluates strategies to reduce homelessness. However, we do not support earmarking future General Fund savings for a specific purpose in the budget message, since the City Council evaluates General Fund uses annually and cannot unnecessarily constrain future Council's budget decisions. The Council could alternatively explore changing the existing Measure E allocations to serve as updated policy guidance for future budget cycles, but given our existing budget commitments and our current deficit context this would be inadvisable.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 3 Integrated into the
M
ayor’s March Budget
Message
New But Aligned This d irection should be struck from the March Budget Message.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 4 Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Limited Authority and
Scope
The Mayor identified the need to augment fundraising, which is why he created this position in his office and received seed funding from local partners. The work has begun and will be coordinated with the City Manager’s Office and City Council offices, as appropriate.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 5(a) Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Within Existing
Workplan/Imminent
Council Report
Staff is already building out a data system to update this framework and inform intervention strategies, and this work aligns with the County partnership and June Focus Area Dashboard updates. Staff is also directed to produce an MBA on the Focus Areas recommending the approach for next fiscal year.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 5(b) Partially integrated into
the Mayor’s March Budget
Message
"Existing relevant MBA,
topic eligible for
consideration "
Staff were directed to produce an MBA on the Focus Areas recommending an approach for next fiscal year, through which they can recommend potential goals and strategies for further exploration (as described below for recommendation 5(c)).
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 5(c) Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Within Existing
Workplan/Imminent
Council Report
Preventing homelessness is a key part of reducing homelessness overall, and this request aligns with that ongoing work. Staff were also directed to produce an MBA on the Focus Areas recommending the approach for next fiscal year, through which they can recommend potential new problem areas, goals, and strategies for exploration.
Appendix
4
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 6 Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Lack of
Resources/Capacity
This proposed optimization is focused on maintaining existing service levels and ensuring continued maintenance of existing No Encampment Zones at lower costs. Staff is currently focused on redeployment and optimization of existing resources. Expanding services, including a proactive weekend BeautifySJ deployment model, could be considered in a future budget cycle.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 7 Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Lack of
Resources/Capacity
This request is not included in the current workplan, and staff do not have the resources or capacity to take on additional assessment work at this time. Current efforts remain focused on existing public safety and quality-of-life priorities already underway.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 8 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
New But Aligned
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 9 Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Lack of
Resources/Capacity
The current budget constraints limit our ability to explore additional funding. To be considered in future years.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 10 Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Lack of
Resources/Capacity
This request is not included in the current workplan, and staff do not have the resources or capacity to take on this additional analysis at this time. Current efforts remain focused on existing housing and homelessness priorities already underway.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 11 Partially integrated into
the Mayor’s March Budget
Message
"Existing relevant MBA,
topic eligible for
consideration "
We support the concept in a narrower form. The direction as written is too broad and operationally prescriptive, but staff could evaluate through an MBA the feasibility and cost of a more targeted strategic code enforcement approach focused on limited geographies, priority corridors, or specific categories of chronically non-compliant properties.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 12 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Within Existing
Workplan/Imminent
Council Report
This request aligns with ongoing Code Enforcement modernization efforts already underway, including consultant-supported work. Staff should retain flexibility to evaluate and advance these recommendations within the broader modernization process.
Appendix
5
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 13 Not integrated into the
M
ayor’s March Budget
Message
To Be Discussed Next FY This concept is aligned with ongoing Code Enforcement modernization efforts, but resource constraints limit staff’s ability to take on a separate new body of work at this time. Staff should retain flexibility to explore this recommendation within the broader modernization process already underway.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 14 Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Lack of
Resources/Capacity
This request requires new funding and is not included in the current workplan. Given current resource constraints, staff are not positioned to launch a new grant-funded outreach pilot at this time. Staff should retain flexibility to consider related ideas within the broader Code Enforcement modernization efforts underway.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 15 Not integrated into the
M
ayor’s March Budget
Message
Lack of
Resources/Capacity
Staff should retain flexibility to explore cost-recovery options, including potential fee and fine adjustments, within the broader Code Enforcement modernization efforts already underway.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 16 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Exists in the MMBM
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 17 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Exists in the MMBM This direction aligns with MMBM emphasis on preserving, to the extent possible, programs that serve historically underserved and vulnerable communities, including efforts that build trust and sustain community connections.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 18 Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Within Existing
Workplan/Imminent
Council Report
This is part of a broader collaborative effort underway with the County, informed by work through the Harvard Bloomberg City Leadership Initiative and ongoing conversations with the District Attorney’s Office and other County stakeholders. While treatment capacity is primarily a County function, Prop 36 outcomes directly affect the City and contribute to ongoing public safety challenges and public sector costs borne by the City.
Learnings from a short study visit would help us better understand how other jurisdictions are coordinating law enforcement, prosecutors, courts, and behavioral health systems to operationalize the law and position the City to be a stronger partner locally. A short study visit to a jurisdiction that is implementing these new tools with success (~500 additional people in a treatment pathway) is an exceedingly small investment if it helps us accelerate the movement of people from the streets to treatment and beyond.
Appendix
6
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 19 Not integrated into the
M
ayor’s March Budget
Message
Lack of
Resources/Capacity
This direction is overly restrictive in prescribing the funding source. Staff are pursuing state funding to support this program, but even if successful, appropriation would take time. Opioid settlement funds would allow the City to move faster, with state funding able to supplement later if it becomes available.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 20 Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Lack of
Resources/Capacity
Adding additional one-time funds would require drawing from reserves, worsening the City’s fiscal position next year. The MMBM also directed staff to complete an MBA on strategy. In the meantime, staff will explore the additional $500,000, and potentially more, through other jurisdictions and private funding sources.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 21 Not integrated into the
M
ayor’s March Budget
Message
Lack of
Resources/Capacity
We appreciate the focus on underserved neighborhoods and on sustaining work that supports children and families. At the same time, the recommendations here call for multiple new reports and gap analyses, which would add work and raise expectations for expansion in a constrained fiscal year. The MMBM already directs us to prioritize children and youth through existing forums that bring together the key system partners and help identify the most strategic interventions and investments. Directing new staff work of this magnitude would require the authors to identify current policy work to deprioritize at this time.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 22 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Exists in the MMBM
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 23 Integrated into the
M
ayor’s March Budget
Message
Exists in the MMBM
Candelas,
Campos,
Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 24 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Exists in the MMBM
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 25 Partially integrated into
the Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Amended Language Direct the City Manager to coordinate with VTA and present findings as part of the EIFD Study Session directed to come to City Council in the Fall of 2026. Further policy direction can occur after the study session.
Appendix
7
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 26 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Within Existing
Workplan/Imminent
Council Report
Our existing procurement processes already awards additional points for businesses and contractors
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 27 Not integrated into the
M
ayor’s March Budget
Message
Lack of
Resources/Capacity
This request is not recommended at this time. The City does not have the resources to cap
italize such a fund or the staffing capacity to administer a relief program of this nature, and demand would likely exceed available support substantially.
Candelas,
Campos,
Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 28 Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Other Jurisdiction
Purview
Childcare is a real issue for working families. It affects whether parents can participate in the workforce, whether families can afford to stay in San José, and whether our economy works for the people who keep this city running. But this budget message has to stay grounded in what the City can responsibly take on in a difficult fiscal year. The most significant childcare interventions would require substantial ongoing funding, staff capacity, and potentially capital investment, while much of the core work in this space is already led by the County, the State, the County Office of Education, and specialized providers better positioned to operate at scale. In a deficit year, our priority should be protecting core services and preserving, where we can, programs that serve vulnerable communities, not committing the City to a broader new body of work we are not well positioned to resource or implement responsibly.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 29 Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Lack of
Resources/Capacity
The Administration should consider the FFN program as part of its broader analysis of how to prioritize the $500,000 for the Children and Youth Services Master Plan, without prescribing that outcome in the budget message itself.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 30 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Within Existing
Workplan/Imminent
Council Report
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 31 Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
To Be Discussed Next FY This work is already being advanced through existing efforts, including the cost of development study, the Building More Housing work, and related housing implementation items. Given current resource constraints, staff should retain flexibility to prioritize and sequence this work through the study session or MBA on 2026–2027 Council Focus Area goals and problem statements, rather than as a separate new directive.
Appendix
8
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 32 Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
To Be Discussed Next FY This work is already being advanced through existing efforts, including the cost of development study, the Building More Housing work, and related housing implementation items. Given current resource constraints, staff should retain flexibility to prioritize and sequence this work through the study session or MBA on 2026–2027 Council Focus Area goals and problem statements, rather than as a separate new directive.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 33 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Exists in the MMBM
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 34 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Amended Language The City Manager is directed to include this is in the citywide planning MBA.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 35 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Amended Language The City Manager is directed to include this is in the citywide planning MBA.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 36 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Amended Language The City Manager is directed to include this is in the citywide planning MBA.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 37 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
New But Aligned This direction is aligned with the City’s interest in exploring new tools to Build More Housing. At the same time, any exploration should be clearly framed as preliminary and subject to significant financial, legal, and operational review, particularly to avoid approaches that would place pension funds or other protected assets at risk. City participation should be evaluated carefully for financial exposure, administrative complexity, and long-term liability.
Candelas,
Campos,
Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 38 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
New But Aligned This direction is aligned with the City’s interest in exploring new tools to Build More Housing. At the same time, any exploration should be clearly framed as preliminary and subject to significant financial, legal, and operational review, particularly to avoid approaches that would place pension funds or other protected assets at risk. City participation should be evaluated carefully for financial exposure, administrative complexity, and long-term liability.
Appendix
9
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 39 Not integrated into the
M
ayor’s March Budget
Message
Lack of
Resources/Capacity
This would be a significant body of work requiring substantial staff time, operational analysis, intergovernmental coordination, and potential system changes. At this stage, the City’s priority should remain delivering an excellent SJ311 system for San José residents and ensuring service quality, responsiveness, and reliability for core City needs before exploring expansion. While the concept may be worth considering in the future, it is not feasible within current capacity and funding reductions.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 40(a) Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Lack of
Resources/Capacity
This would be a significant body of work requiring substantial staff time, operational analysis, intergovernmental coordination, and potential changes to existing financial tracking practices and systems. The City is already advancing work to improve its dashboards and use of data, as well as partnering with jurisdictions, especially the County, to share costs and refine service delivery. With limited staff and resource capacity next fiscal year, the priority should be on optimizing and implementing those efforts effectively before adding a broader cross-departmental and interjurisdictional cost-allocation exercise.
While the concept could help inform future policy and budget discussions, it is not feasible within current capacity.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 40(b) Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Lack of
Resources/Capacity
This would be a significant body of work requiring substantial staff time, operational analysis, intergovernmental coordination, and potential changes to existing financial tracking practices and systems. The City is already advancing work to improve its dashboards and use of data, as well as partnering with jurisdictions, especially the County, to share costs and refine service delivery. With limited staff and resource capacity next fiscal year, the priority should be on optimizing and implementing those efforts effectively before adding a broader cross-departmental and interjurisdictional cost-allocation exercise.
While the concept could help inform future policy and budget discussions, it is not feasible within current capacity.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 40(c) Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Lack of
Resources/Capacity
While coordination with other jurisdictions with significant land in San José is important, this direction is too prescriptive as a budget priority. The City should address these needs through regular operational practice rather than committing limited staff resources to a broader MOU expansion effort.
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 41 Integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Within Existing
Workplan/Imminent
Council Report
Appendix
10
Candelas,
Campos, Ortiz,
Doan, and
Casey
3/13/2026 42 Not integrated into the
Mayor’s March Budget
Message
Limited Authority and
Scope
Much of the requested analysis extends beyond the City’s authority, as rate-setting is governed through CPUC processes and ongoing state action. The April 21st data center council item will provide an opportunity for greater discussion. The most appropriate role for the City at this time, while the City works to establish a market, is to consider support for state and federal policy that mitigates risks to other ratepayers and protects residents and small businesses.