This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Helen Beaton Grover, 95112
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Isis Banks David, 95128
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates 6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an ag enda posting
after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutin
y, independent analysis, and questioning on the
record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Michael Gallo, 95139
---
[1] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342
1 Robust public outreach proportionate to the scale of this historic buildout 2 An independent cumulative impacts analysis covering all proposed and anticipated data center projects, rather than fragmented project-by-project review 3 A comprehensive study of air pollution from all backup power sources, fuel types, annual testing hours, outage scenarios, and emergency operating assumptions with clear mitigation requirements 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates 6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record.
Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Ema Ibarra, 95122
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
1 Robust public outreach proportionate to the scale of this historic buildout 2 An independent cumulative impacts analysis covering all proposed and anticipated data center projects, rather than fragmented project-by-project review 3 A comprehensive study of air pollution from all backup power sources, fuel types, annual testing hours, outage scenarios, and emergency operating assumptions with clear mitigation requirements 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates 6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record.
Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Ema Ibarra, 95122
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. hours, outage scenarios, and emergency operating assumptions with clear mitigation requirements 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Marilyn Peek, 95139
--
Marilyn Peek
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Jayine Lee, 95122
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
---
[1] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Sara Chen, 94566
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
LORETTE KENNEY, 95123
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342 Lorette Kenney
Fairchild Superfund site), I can't help but reflect on a few things. I cannot recall ANY public outreach or feedback sessions about the data center that was built. There is no place I can go as a constituent to understand the comprehensive effect of multiple data centers being built in my district, meanwhile, I continue to see large nearby real estate purchases that appear related to future data centers. [4] Of the two dozen neighbors I've spoken to over the last several days, none of them know anything about the city's plans regarding data centers. Yet half of them know the city's plans for the next Viva Calle event. The Public Outreach section of the city's memorandum for this item lists "This memorandum will be posted on the City Council Agenda website for the April 21, 2026 City Council meeting." I've faced higher community outreach standards for street closures and public art work. At best, the lack of community engagement on data centers is poor, at worst it's intentionally negligent and unbecoming of elected officials and city leadership.
Measure I was approved by voters in 2022 to transform public decision-making. Under Charter Section 608 [1] and the Equity Values and Standards Council Policy [2] the City is obligated to center equity, accountability, and meaningful community engagement in its decisions. To date there have been no public study sessions on the cumulative public health impacts of bringing this many data centers online in San José. For a buildout of this scale and consequence, Council must exercise proper due diligence by holding a public study session on the cumulative public health impacts.
At a minimum, the City must address the following:
1 Robust public outreach proportionate to the scale of this historic buildout 2 An independent cumulative impacts analysis covering all proposed and anticipated data center projects, rather than fragmented project-by-project review 3 A comprehensive study of air pollution from all backup power sources, fuel types, annual testing hours, outage scenarios, and emergency operating assumptions with clear mitigation requirements 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Thank you,
Stacey Kellogg, 95123
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342 [3] https://www.kqed.org/news/11630861/how-silicon-valley-industry-polluted-the-sylvan-california- dream
[4] https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2026/02/26/san-jose-tech-data-ai-build-property-economy-real- estate-web-develop/
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Kikei Wong, 90501
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. 3 A comprehensive study of air pollution from all backup power sources, fuel types, annual testing hours, outage scenarios, and emergency operating assumptions with clear mitigation requirements 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Luis Bustamante, 95139
---
[1] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342
1 Robust public outreach proportionate to the scale of this historic buildout 2 An independent cumulative impacts analysis covering all proposed and anticipated data center projects, rather than fragmented project-by-project review 3 A comprehensive study of air pollution from all backup power sources, fuel types, annual testing hours, outage scenarios, and emergency operating assumptions with clear mitigation requirements 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates 6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record.
Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Keiana Andino, 95125
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342 Sent from my iPhone
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
1 Robust public outreach proportionate to the scale of this historic buildout 2 An independent cumulative impacts analysis covering all proposed and anticipated data center projects, rather than fragmented project-by-project review 3 A comprehensive study of air pollution from all backup power sources, fuel types, annual testing hours, outage scenarios, and emergency operating assumptions with clear mitigation requirements 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates 6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record.
Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Romina Karim, 95138
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342 Sent from my iPhone
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
1. Robust public outreach proportionate to the scale of this historic buildout
2. An independent cumulative impacts analysis covering all proposed and anticipated data center projects, rather than fragmented project-by-project review
3. A comprehensive study of air pollution from all backup power sources, fuel types, annual testing hours, outage scenarios, and emergency operating assumptions with clear mitigation requirements
4. Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5. Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6. Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7. Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8. Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards
9. A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Shaf Khan, 95138
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342
1 Robust public outreach proportionate to the scale of this historic buildout 2 An independent cumulative impacts analysis covering all proposed and anticipated data center projects, rather than fragmented project-by-project review 3 A comprehensive study of air pollution from all backup power sources, fuel types, annual testing hours, outage scenarios, and emergency operating assumptions with clear mitigation requirements 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates 6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record.
Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve. evelyn Madden, 95123
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342 Evelyn Madden
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
1 Robust public outreach proportionate to the scale of this historic buildout 2 An independent cumulative impacts analysis covering all proposed and anticipated data center projects, rather than fragmented project-by-project review 3 A comprehensive study of air pollution from all backup power sources, fuel types, annual testing hours, outage scenarios, and emergency operating assumptions with clear mitigation requirements 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates 6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record.
Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Mitchell Fredrickson, 95112
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342 Sent from my iPhone
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Nathan Flohr, 95133
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342
1 Robust public outreach proportionate to the scale of this historic buildout 2 An independent cumulative impacts analysis covering all proposed and anticipated data center projects, rather than fragmented project-by-project review 3 A comprehensive study of air pollution from all backup power sources, fuel types, annual testing hours, outage scenarios, and emergency operating assumptions with clear mitigation requirements 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates 6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record.
Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Binh Tran, 95132
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342 Sent from my iPhone
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Steven Pham, 95127
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342 Virus-free.www.avg.com
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Rachelle Kim, 95131
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. mandates
6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with 10% local-only hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Michael Armes, 95123
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Chetan Surpur, 95119
---
[1] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
I look forward to your response.
4/20/26, 4:32 PM Mail - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.cloud.microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5M… 2/2
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. from risks to air and water quality. I ask that the San José City Council to pause any plans and invoke a moratorium on data centers until the full impacts on the environment, the community and San Jose ratepayers are fully disclosed.
Thanks- Serena
--
Serena Myjer
4/20/26, 4:33 PM Inbox - Agendadesk - Outlook
https://outlook.cloud.microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADUxOWI4ZjE3LTRkNDEtNGUzMS04MjAwLTIzNzdiYTdkMjc5NAAQ… 2/2
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. not water and electricity to spare, yet the City wants to encourage the growth of businesses that use insane amounts of both.
Data center emissions information is not readily available, and also does not seem to be given the weight it deserves.
Growing the tax base should not be the only goal of the City and this Council. There is so much more to consider. For full accountability, which is touted so often, please do more to engage with the community.
Krista Hamby
San Jose
Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer
4/20/26, 2:28 PM Mail - Agendadesk - Outlook
https://outlook.cloud.microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADUxOWI4ZjE3LTRkNDEtNGUzMS04MjAwLTIzNzdiYTdkMjc5NAAQ… 2/2
Until this ruling is finalized, the community remains rightfully concerned that "Type 4" transmission upgrades—those designated for system-wide capacity, reliability, and resiliency—may disproportionately lean on residential ratepayers rather than the large-load customers directly driving the need for these massive grid expansions. The community asks for a proactive commitment from this Council: that no systemic grid-hardening costs attributed to the data center pipeline be socialized onto residential utility bills.
The Transparency and Accountability Gap
The memorandum touts a "structured, accountable framework" for advancing electrical infrastructure, citing biweekly coordination meetings between City staff and PG&E, and a quarterly performance scoring system. While these internal mechanisms are undoubtedly helpful for administrative efficiency, they remain a "black box" to the public.
Community members, through their correspondence, have expressed significant skepticism regarding the efficacy of these behind-the-scenes meetings. For "accountability" to be more than a rhetorical term, the City must invite the public into the process. I formally request that the City publish the raw metrics from these quarterly performance scores in an accessible, online dashboard. If the partnership is indeed meeting the milestones established in the Implementation Agreement, the City should have no hesitation in providing that data to the taxpayers who are, ultimately, underwriting the risks of these developments.
Cumulative Environmental Impacts
The City’s approach to environmental mitigation relies on project-by-project CEQA reviews. While this complies with the letter of the law, it fails to account for the cumulative impact of 34+ large-load energy projects operating in a relatively localized urban environment. The letters submitted by the public frequently touch on the "death by a thousand cuts" scenario: where individual projects appear environmentally manageable, but the aggregate load—including water usage, noise, and air pollution from backup generators—creates a permanent industrial impact on our neighborhoods.
Furthermore, the reliance on "recycled water" as a mitigation strategy is inherently risky given that such service is interruptible. If a project relies on recycled water and that supply is curtailed, we lack a clear public understanding of how these facilities will satisfy their water demand without drawing down our potable supply. A "status report" that claims environmental stewardship must provide more than a list of regulatory requirements; it must provide a model of the cumulative environmental baseline we are establishing for the next decade.
Recommendations for the City Council
To ensure the trust of the community and the fiscal safety of our City, I respectfully urge the Council to consider the following actions prior to accepting this report:
1. Demand Data Transparency: Require the City Manager’s Office to publish the performance scores for the 12 projects currently under the Implementation Agreement, ensuring the public can verify the City’s claim that PG&E is "on schedule".
2. Request a Cumulative Impact Study: Commission an annual "Cumulative Infrastructure and Environmental Report" that moves beyond project-by-project analysis to assess the aggregate load, water consumption, and air quality impact of the entire 34-project pipeline. 4/20/26, 3:06 PM Mail - Agendadesk - Outlook
https://outlook.cloud.microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADUxOWI4ZjE3LTRkNDEtNGUzMS04MjAwLTIzNzdiYTdkMjc5NAAQ… 2/3 This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
3. Formalize Ratepayer Protections: Direct staff to draft a formal resolution or policy position explicitly stating the City’s opposition to socializing "Type 4" grid-hardening costs onto residential ratepayers, to be presented to the CPUC as part of the ongoing Rule 30 proceedings.
San José has the potential to lead the digital economy without compromising the stability of our neighborhoods. However, this success must be built on a foundation of verifiable data and transparent governance, not just the promise of future revenue. I look forward to your leadership on this critical issue during the April 21st meeting.
Sincerely,
Brian Darby
4/20/26, 3:06 PM Mail - Agendadesk - Outlook
https://outlook.cloud.microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADUxOWI4ZjE3LTRkNDEtNGUzMS04MjAwLTIzNzdiYTdkMjc5NAAQ… 3/3
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
How can you let this happen to us?
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
Is this true??
A buildout of this scale requires public engagement proportionate to its impact. Are residents being treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway?
That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record.
Suzanne Magno, 95131
4/20/26, 3:30 PM Mail - Agendadesk - Outlook
https://outlook.cloud.microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADUxOWI4ZjE3LTRkNDEtNGUzMS04MjAwLTIzNzdiYTdkMjc5NAAQ… 2/2
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. get into the efficacy of AI in general but these data centers have been proven to cause serious harm to the areas in which they are built and if we want San Jose to continue being the beacon of innovation that it is then we need to ensure that it remains a city in which people want to, and are able to, live.
We are a city of over a million people. People from all over the world come here, they raise families, invest in our world class schools and universities, and contribute to the beautiful diversity that makes the Bay Area (and California) such a remarkable place.
I cannot stress enough how poisonous these data centers are. They are a short term investment with long term, generational consequences. We are blessed to live in an area with access to old growth redwood forests, pristine coastlines, and delicate baylands. And we would be sacrificing all this just for short term gains that would push our infrastructure beyond its breaking point. Not to mention that the increased power usage would almost certainly guarantee a more prolonged and dangerous fire season.
I implore you to please deny building permits to these data centers. The future of our city is at stake. I think I speak for everyone when I say that fresh water, blue skies, and verdant forests far outlay any possible benefit a data center might provide.
Yours in gratitude,
Keenan Flagg
Resident of District 2, San Jose CA
sources for the environmental impact of data centers
https://news.mit.edu/2025/explained-generative-ai-environmental-impact-0117 https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2025/11/roadmap-shows-environmental-impact-ai-data-center- boom#:~:text=The%20environmental%20impact%20of%20AI%20includes:%20*,tons%20of%20carbon %20dioxide%20into%20the%20atmosphere.
https://www.lincolninst.edu/publications/land-lines-magazine/articles/land-water-impacts-data- centers/
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. projects, rather than fragmented project-by-project review 3 A comprehensive study of air pollution from all backup power sources, fuel types, annual testing hours, outage scenarios, and emergency operating assumptions with clear mitigation requirements 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Yanelly De La Rosa, 95116
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
1. Robust public outreach proportionate to the scale of this historic buildout
2. An independent cumulative impacts analysis covering all proposed and anticipated data center projects, rather than fragmented project-by-project review
3. A comprehensive study of air pollution from all backup power sources, fuel types, annual testing hours, outage scenarios, and emergency operating assumptions with clear mitigation requirements
4. Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5. Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6. Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7. Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8. Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards
9. A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Thank you for your consideration,
Azucena Molina, 95126
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. hours, outage scenarios, and emergency operating assumptions with clear mitigation requirements 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Kohaku Sumida, 95125
---
[1]
https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
I am humbly asking you all to support this item.
In solidarity,
Alex Caraballo
Vice President, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers LU 332 San Jose resident, 95134
• Studies regarding air pollution from all backup power sources, fuel types, annual testing hours, outage scenarios, and emergency operating assumptions with clear mitigation requirements • Legal assurances to water use, and water quality, including risks tied to closed loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing. We just had an ask for increase in water rates, I don't want to be paying more for water, to be subsidizing or supporting data centers. We are in a drought so often, we are under snowpack this year, how can we risk the amount of water that data centers require?
• What would be the penalties and enforcement measures, should these unwanted data centers be built, if they violate public health mandates. If they are proven dangerous for public health, are they immediately shut down? Where are the guarantees that public health comes first? • Full and transparent public disclosures of projected energy demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers. Again, electricity is already high enough. Tax payers have been subsidizing PG&E and their mistakes for years. We deal with rolling blackouts already during hot months, and there will be more and more hot months as our climate continues to change. No energy for data centers before the public. Our power grid is already outdated, why would we be putting an additional stress on it?
• Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat. Also, how will these things not only affect the people of the community but our larger nature community. Will it hurt native species of flora and fauna. Why are we choosing to be guinea pigs when we don't know the long term costs?
• Framework that centers community benefits and enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth.
The memorandum from the City Manager's office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that NO ADDITIONAL City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports? NO board or commission input is associated with this action? The entirety of the stated public outreach is the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21 meeting? That is NOT meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence, that we DON'T know the long term effects of.
This demands public engagements proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San Jose to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while RESIDENTS are treated as an afterthought, and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway! The imbalance is UNACCEPTABLE, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems. We have no long term data on this, and what we do have is exceedingly concerning.
Residents, homeowners, tax payers, like myself, deserve a dedicated public study session before San Jose takes even one step further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail the public the Council is sworn to serve.
Mylissa Malley
95125
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
Mylissa Malley
she/her/hers
Actor | Teaching Artist
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. billion dollar industry did not come running to save us from microplastics, neither will this billion dollar ai/data center industry come back for reparations when our environment is destroyed, when children are sick, and when the bubble busts.
It would behoove the Council to take the time to better understand what it is you are rushing to build and truly for whom?
852 people give or take have signed the following petition:
San José City Council must exercise proper due diligence by holding a public study session on the cumulative public health impacts of bringing this many data centers online, including impacts on air quality, water, noise, and heat. The public has a right to transparency, accountability, and a meaningful opportunity to understand how development at this scale could affect community health, neighborhood conditions, and long term quality of life.
I hope that today you remember that your oath to office was to our constitution (see section 608), and the people. NOT private utility, NOT private equity, NOT data center developers.
Your San Jose Resident - Ellina Yin, District 6
PS- THANK YOU to the entire City Clerk team, I know that was a lot of letters. As my librarians of the cities I deeply appreciate the work you do for our city.
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. 2 An independent cumulative impacts analysis covering all proposed and anticipated data center projects, rather than fragmented project-by-project review 3 A comprehensive study of air pollution from all backup power sources, fuel types, annual testing hours, outage scenarios, and emergency operating assumptions with clear mitigation requirements 4 Legal assurances regarding water quality and water use, including risks tied to closed-loop system blowdowns, failures, and backup water sourcing
5 Clear penalties, enforcement mechanisms, and accountability for violations of public health mandates
6 Full public disclosure of projected electricity demand, transmission and distribution upgrades, and any long-term cost risks to ratepayers
7 Baseline and ongoing public health monitoring for nearby communities, including impacts related to air quality, noise, and heat
8 Concrete job guarantees for permanent jobs, with local hire and labor standards 9 A community benefits framework with enforceable public accountability, not vague promises of economic growth
The memorandum from the City Manager’s office makes clear that the City is advancing a historic buildout tied to 2,000 MW of new regional transmission capacity and a growing pipeline of large-load projects. At the same time, it states that no additional City Council follow-up is expected beyond annual status reports, that no board or commission input is associated with this action, and that the entirety of the stated public outreach is that the memorandum will be posted on the City Council agenda website for the April 21, 2026 meeting. That is not meaningful public outreach for an item of enormous consequence.
A buildout of this scale demands public engagement proportionate to its impact. It is not enough to market San José to industry, hold press events, attend conferences, and meet with more than 50 potential developers while residents are treated as an afterthought and receive only an agenda posting after key frameworks are already underway. That imbalance is unacceptable, especially for infrastructure and land use decisions with potentially long-term consequences for public health, environmental quality, neighborhood conditions, and utility systems.
Residents deserve a dedicated public study session before San José moves further down a path that could lock in major pollution and public health burdens. If the City believes its safeguards are sufficient, then those claims should withstand public scrutiny, independent analysis, and questioning on the record. Anything less would fail both the spirit of Measure I and the public the Council is sworn to serve.
NO MORE DATA CENTERS IN SAN JOSE!!
Thank you.
Respectfully,
Kristin McFarlane White, 95123
---
[1] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/95973/638574336991130000 [2] https://www.sanjoseca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/114681/638627814182829342
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
Please read the attached letter for our full comments.
Sincerely,
Dashiell Leeds
Conservation Coordinator
Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter
Alice Kaufman
Policy and Advocacy Director
Green Foothills
Shani Kleinhaus
Environmental Advocate
Santa Clara Valley Bird Alliance
Shruti Gopinathan
Leadership Team Member
Mothers Out Front Silicon Valley
Anika K.
Silicon Valley Youth Climate Action
San Jose Youth Climate Action Team
Daphne Zhu
Silicon Valley Youth Climate Action
San Jose Youth Climate Action Team
proposed project whether it is required by state regulations or not, and commit to adequate mitigation of any environmental or health harm.
Data center development also needs to be considered in the context of San José’s climate goals. The proliferation of new data centers in order to power the current AI boom threatens to send fossil fuel production and resultant greenhouse gas emissions skyrocketing. Google’s greenhouse gas emissions increased nearly 50% between 2019 and 2024, because, according to the Associated Press, “Google cited artificial intelligence and the demand it puts on data centers, which require massive amounts of electricity,” for this increase. See also Microsoft’s emissions soar by 30%: Why is it building more data centres and what is their impact?
Please do not proceed with data center planning as a foregone conclusion. The City must commit to transparency and a process that allows communities to be fully informed, to meaningfully shape outcomes, and to reject projects that pose unacceptable risks. San José’s communities deserve the right to be informed, and they deserve the right to say no to data centers.
Sincerely,
Dashiell Leeds
Conservation Coordinator
Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter
Alice Kaufman
Policy and Advocacy Director
Green Foothills
Shani Kleinhaus
Environmental Advocate
Santa Clara Valley Bird Alliance
Shruti Gopinathan
Leadership Team Member
Mothers Out Front Silicon Valley
Anika K.
Silicon Valley Youth Climate Action
San Jose Youth Climate Action Team
Daphne Zhu
Silicon Valley Youth Climate Action
San Jose Youth Climate Action Team
30 Jean Jennett 95121 2026-04-17 18:52:00.013+00
31 Jelena Cheyiam 95136 2026-04-18 22:58:25.861+00
32 SAMANTHA JONES 95135 2026-04-17 11:35:37.737+00
33 Mona Wang 95120 2026-04-17 05:37:36.759+00
34 Elizabeth Meier 95124 2026-04-16 14:26:22.88861+00
35 Melissa Encinas 91740 2026-04-18 04:21:09.654+00
36 stephanie kraemer 95128 2026-04-18 01:53:10.403+00
37 Kathy Chu 95131 2026-04-18 00:01:19.871+00
38 Stephen Whalen 95119 2026-04-16 23:34:10.376672+00
39 Emily Scroggs 94610 2026-04-21 13:50:32.448+00
40 Miguel P 94306 2026-04-21 06:50:06.826+00
41 Crystal Wakamiya 95014 2026-04-21 03:12:00.827+00
42 Barbara Wilkie 95008 2026-04-20 03:01:54.71+00
43 Gregg Aronica 95111 2026-04-20 23:00:06.431+00
44 Tatiana Gupta 94563 2026-04-19 05:28:54.127+00
45 Chester Peterson 95110 2026-04-17 02:26:28.30264+00
46 Kaitlyn Howden 90504 2026-04-16 20:27:06.47134+00
47 Daniel Rios 95132 2026-04-17 13:19:12.439+00
48 Heather Peters 95124 2026-04-21 04:52:45.227+00
49 Athena Chan 95134 2026-04-17 14:31:03.801+00
50 Vanhue Huynh 95148 2026-04-16 08:33:26.872835+00
51 Paola Sanchez 95148 2026-04-16 22:36:46.25008+00
52 Yolanda Gramza 95123 2026-04-19 14:40:23.973+00
53 Michelle Boire 95125 2026-04-16 01:36:02.802607+00
54 Pierce McInturff 95112 2026-04-16 23:29:10.369266+00 55 Jimena Gomez 95121 2026-04-19 23:27:10.141+00
56 Tyler Morgan 95112 2026-04-21 04:18:32.877+00
57 Aydrian Drewery 95120 2026-04-17 02:45:35.994335+00
58 vanessa ochoa 95133 2026-04-16 20:24:15.278284+00
59 Michelle Chambers 95125 2026-04-18 19:41:55.001+00
60 Kevin Mckinnon 95127 2026-04-16 14:24:12.015439+00
61 Lindsey Mangan 95123 2026-04-17 00:41:43.693598+00
62 Jennifer Wright 95112 2026-04-16 16:13:57.460281+00
63 Robbi Stovall 95148 2026-04-18 17:39:25.59+00
64 Halle Weingarten 95148 2026-04-17 04:45:23.107+00
65 Rylee Blechman 95120 2026-04-18 23:49:52.689+00
66 Changho Choi 95120 2026-04-16 23:09:42.418338+00
67 Sarah Nguyen 95127 2026-04-21 03:07:31.485+00
68 Ivan Flores 95127 2026-04-17 04:40:00.344+00
69 Karen Mettler 95128 2026-04-17 15:07:26.091+00
70 Blanca Soto 95110 2026-04-15 21:29:49.865544+00
71 Gloria Manso 95127 2026-04-18 19:48:24.74+00
72 Jake West 95117 2026-04-15 23:50:45.97566+00
73 Danae Griffin 94541 2026-04-15 23:58:47.497958+00
74 Anna Smith 94611 2026-04-18 10:56:24.015+00
75 Arpitha Ravishankar 95116 2026-04-18 12:12:04.885+00 76 Michelle Alcantar 95116 2026-04-16 22:49:05.549014+00 77 Joel mjolsness 95120 2026-04-18 16:00:05.798+00
78 Lillian Clegg 90701 2026-04-20 07:16:33.84+00
79 Mia Thompson 95124 2026-04-16 02:37:58.114605+00
80 Kyle Campbell 95118 2026-04-21 08:38:00.411+00
81 Jordan Cassell 95125 2026-04-18 18:25:32.357+00
82 Marylou Cardosa 95126 2026-04-20 23:32:07.725+00
83 Tamar Sasson 95124 2026-04-17 04:31:05.159+00
84 Karen Nguyen 95136 2026-04-18 00:33:43.49+00
85 Hannah McElroy 95118 2026-04-21 07:50:16.904+00
86 Carrie Pizzo 95119 2026-04-17 23:06:13.093+00
87 Pamela Sandoval 95123 2026-04-18 03:55:29.274+00
88 Kathryn Sinon 95123 2026-04-20 20:58:09.045+00
89 Matthew Hollenbeck 95035 2026-04-18 05:14:14.428+00
90 Eduardo Luciano
Venancio
95121 2026-04-18 20:40:19.881+00
91 Julisa Garcia 95121 2026-04-21 00:54:30.177+00
92 Kayleigh Alvarado 92071 2026-04-21 06:12:02.964+00
93 Evelyn Beas 95127 2026-04-18 23:39:34.52+00
94 Michelle Siller 95139 2026-04-17 01:47:29.149534+00
95 Sandra Chincarini 95125 2026-04-19 22:56:42.577+00
96 Emma` Swinnen 95120 2026-04-21 04:42:35.903+00
97 Marcela Guerrero 95122 2026-04-17 01:30:30.700769+00 98 Patty Edgerton 95123 2026-04-16 21:04:30.544724+00
99 Virginia Guttenbeil 95125 2026-04-17 15:31:38.951+00 100 Thanh Bui 95117 2026-04-21 06:32:49.734+00
101 Fatima Panes 95111 2026-04-16 23:26:00.135224+00
102 Jacqueline Rivera 95133 2026-04-16 02:14:26.008191+00 103 Hong Jiang 95120 2026-04-17 04:32:12.504+00
104 Jazmin Alcantar 93635 2026-04-17 00:11:39.810311+00 105 Steven Pham 95127 2026-04-17 23:09:37.382+00
106 Varun Haldiya 95123 2026-04-17 23:58:19.705+00
107 Sean Niemann 95033 2026-04-19 04:24:49.001+00
108 Nancy Maynard 95037 2026-04-17 04:14:26.786248+00
109 Maria Jaime 95128 2026-04-17 01:49:13.929602+00
110 Raul Dimas 95062 2026-04-15 22:26:27.97121+00
111 Delia Perez 95119 2026-04-16 03:48:33.058039+00
112 Ellina Yin 95126 2026-04-15 02:31:49.0195+00
113 Melelatai Guttenbeil 95113 2026-04-15 20:40:12.76961+00 114 Mary McLeod 95129 2026-04-16 14:12:58.422114+00
115 Jayine Lee 95122 2026-04-17 18:28:36.568+00
116 Stacy Laughlin 95124 2026-04-19 22:04:15.15+00
117 Kayla Shattuck 95123 2026-04-19 00:01:58.225+00
118 Michael Wittig 95124 2026-04-21 01:08:40.071+00
119 Elizabeth Agramont-
Justiniano
95112 2026-04-16 06:00:38.51929+00
120 Jason Hackett 38125 2026-04-21 05:38:20.095+00
121 Isabelle Su 95131 2026-04-20 22:13:29.493+00
122 Glady Lee 95129 2026-04-21 05:27:42.476+00
123 Angie Guatemala 95126 2026-04-16 16:14:01.33495+00
124 Harsha Gorti 95037 2026-04-16 16:23:30.850881+00
125 Ryo Wakabayashi 95117 2026-04-15 22:03:16.852772+00 126 Tatiana V C 95133 2026-04-16 05:31:24.886611+00
127 Vanessa Nguyen 95121 2026-04-17 03:58:22.508137+00 128 Richard Hobbs 95112 2026-04-20 20:14:07.417+00
129 Sai R 95120 2026-04-17 05:38:55.323+00
130 Norbert Phan 95121 2026-04-17 02:48:08.517908+00
131 Vivian Nguyen 95148 2026-04-18 16:48:57.81+00
132 Prisila Mena 95112 2026-04-19 04:53:26.281+00
133 Italy Vargas 95121 2026-04-18 20:37:11.461+00
134 Lisa Dodge 95054 2026-04-20 20:29:08.23+00
135 Elvira Mendoza 95112 2026-04-20 13:48:59.65+00
136 Alexis Woo 95035 2026-04-16 22:49:07.335654+00
137 Louise Just 95127 2026-04-21 13:53:17.401+00
138 Luca Grisendi 42122 2026-04-21 13:10:10.517+00
139 Michael Armes 95123 2026-04-17 23:49:47.204+00
140 Sylvia Trejo 95148 2026-04-17 03:17:53.46353+00
141 Jason Chen 95123 2026-04-18 17:57:19.294+00
142 David Michalicek 95120 2026-04-17 03:54:18.454262+00 143 Kinan Cardenas 95125 2026-04-17 07:50:39.161+00
144 Kevin Huang 95131 2026-04-17 01:56:52.411039+00
145 Leon Coahran 95003 2026-04-21 07:10:39.6+00
146 Elizabeth Munoz 95111 2026-04-16 17:05:58.232022+00
147 Blanca Fajardo 95122 2026-04-19 14:45:55.248+00
148 Richard hoffman 95111 2026-04-20 21:56:16.978+00
149 dal b 33196 2026-04-17 08:01:07.746+00
150 Julia Fiola 95128 2026-04-21 08:48:51.883+00
151 Avalon Hatfield 95829 2026-04-17 14:48:54.5+00
152 G. Bardel 95120 2026-04-19 00:44:59.542+00
153 Kim Nguyen 95120 2026-04-17 01:09:54.600577+00
154 Moses Guarneros 94544 2026-04-17 04:38:15.627+00
155 Angelica Rangel 95110 2026-04-15 20:55:21.470049+00 156 Ivette Deltoro 95111 2026-04-17 01:07:04.061783+00
157 Hector Guardado 95148 2026-04-16 20:10:06.584694+00 158 Diane Liang 95008 2026-04-20 18:56:43.172+00
159 Evelyn Park-Doob 95133 2026-04-17 01:31:29.137929+00 160 Tiffanh Nguyen 95616 2026-04-19 02:39:35.467+00
161 Mayeann Acosta 95111 2026-04-16 04:48:17.705791+00
162 Shelle Thomas 95125 2026-04-19 01:17:37.398+00
163 Brenda Arreola 95035 2026-04-18 05:17:27.653+00
164 Mitchell Fredrickson 95112 2026-04-17 22:14:55.834+00 165 Valaree Cech 95035 2026-04-16 14:06:37.68156+00
166 Elizabeth Medina-Alvarez 95136 2026-04-20 22:45:32.354+00 167 Shazia Raza 95116 2026-04-17 15:16:55.392+00
168 Janette Wong 95117 2026-04-16 20:40:25.236992+00
169 Kate Wilkins 95118 2026-04-19 22:45:31.815+00
170 Divya Pari 95120 2026-04-16 23:55:06.57451+00
171 Katie Barrow 95124 2026-04-16 01:07:24.177598+00
172 Leslie Fisk 95111 2026-04-17 11:10:57.085+00
173 Andrea Lamperti 95119 2026-04-18 04:49:51.723+00
174 Erin McLoughlin 95118 2026-04-20 18:36:54.255+00
175 Ari Perez 95133 2026-04-16 01:10:44.640584+00
176 Katherine Carranza 95112 2026-04-16 18:11:42.542699+00 177 Kevin Leonard 95119 2026-04-18 02:43:28.23+00
178 Nicole Fernandez 95035 2026-04-16 20:51:40.939668+00 179 Yong Nan Choi 95121 2026-04-17 04:05:07.200096+00
180 Carey Lloyd 95118 2026-04-20 15:46:47.043+00
181 Rita Baldwin 95123 2026-04-17 02:34:18.54398+00
182 Shalini Mukherjee 95120 2026-04-17 11:56:56.844+00
183 Stephanie Ngo 95051 2026-04-17 14:11:21.189+00
184 Ariella Honesto 95122 2026-04-21 03:38:20.008+00
185 Diane Larrea 95138 2026-04-17 00:24:24.877515+00
186 Jenny Gargarita 95123 2026-04-17 05:53:26.93+00
187 Karis Ryu 6511 2026-04-17 21:20:25.578+00
188 Beti Magana 95123 2026-04-17 00:16:04.429567+00
189 Danielle Hollenbeck 95035 2026-04-18 04:46:27.823+00 190 Jannassa Do 95127 2026-04-18 04:04:55.038+00
191 Lillian Ji 95138 2026-04-21 10:01:30.427+00
192 Laine Schlezinger 94703 2026-04-17 03:13:31.120686+00 193 Chris Valencia 95138 2026-04-16 22:58:00.342762+00
194 Michelle H 95129 2026-04-21 10:35:04.303+00
195 Isis Banks David 95128 2026-04-17 17:14:24.083+00
196 Marilyn Dion 95125 2026-04-17 22:51:33.714+00
197 Estela Lozano 95112 2026-04-16 15:08:49.46556+00
198 Daisy Vargas 95127 2026-04-18 23:32:43.643+00
199 Gloria Tello 95008 2026-04-16 17:01:48.755865+00
200 Kristen Wachter 95125 2026-04-20 00:42:17.195+00
201 Raquel Martinez 95127 2026-04-17 01:53:52.039944+00 202 Anika Knowles 95118 2026-04-16 20:05:59.819535+00
203 Sun Liu 95148 2026-04-16 23:45:22.194415+00
204 Anusha R 95123 2026-04-17 23:29:03.594+00
205 Cynthia HERRERA 95148 2026-04-20 22:03:10.484+00
206 Robyn Riedstra 95008 2026-04-18 16:48:58.842+00
207 S P 95120 2026-04-17 04:55:43.513+00
208 Aaron Genovia 95132 2026-04-18 04:09:35.801+00
209 Nicolete Noto 95135 2026-04-17 06:10:54.879+00
210 Christa Stone 94928 2026-04-15 22:19:52.751409+00
211 Vanda McCauley 95123 2026-04-18 05:30:49.199+00
212 DAVID Poeschel 95120 2026-04-19 01:08:21.406+00
213 Arlene Biala 94086 2026-04-20 20:03:15.747+00
214 Iszac Gaton 95111 2026-04-21 14:08:44.677+00
215 Desiree Seusy 95132 2026-04-17 19:50:40.721+00
216 Gary Dundon 7866 2026-04-21 10:09:50.641+00
217 Vanda McCauley 95123 2026-04-17 07:48:24.293+00
218 Anna Gomes 95112 2026-04-18 04:04:05.999+00
219 Erika Lalaine Carls 94544 2026-04-17 01:49:24.854738+00 220 Aaron Grayson 94608 2026-04-20 00:01:31.972+00
221 Kathleen A Lechner 95135 2026-04-20 01:26:43.398+00 222 Wai Leung 95110 2026-04-16 23:18:39.150817+00
223 Guillermo Arenas 95116 2026-04-21 04:39:00.336+00
224 Akhila R 95123 2026-04-17 02:29:39.304801+00
225 henry sim 95121 2026-04-17 14:54:21.18+00
226 Charles Carroll 95123 2026-04-20 23:45:43.173+00
227 Rylie Switkes 95117 2026-04-18 22:11:58.304+00
228 Trang Le 95121 2026-04-17 15:20:57.452+00
229 Swathi Nambiar 95136 2026-04-20 05:03:54.077+00
230 Emily Munoz 95133 2026-04-17 15:53:40.562+00
231 Ivonne Millan 95139 2026-04-18 06:20:45.451+00
232 Miranda Duran 94015 2026-04-17 08:14:07.119+00
233 Alexandra Velazquez 95126 2026-04-21 02:21:41.663+00 234 Christina Fiscalini 95123 2026-04-20 14:51:52.978+00 235 Tina Verduzco 95124 2026-04-21 00:30:36.305+00
236 Carolyn Ngo-Bell 95126 2026-04-16 22:13:53.164819+00 237 Helen Beaton Grover 95112 2026-04-17 15:23:41.973+00 238 Loreliz Jacinto 95112 2026-04-17 05:53:06.333+00
239 Kikei Wong 90501 2026-04-17 19:54:04.285+00
240 Tiffanie Tran 95138 2026-04-16 21:26:34.883818+00
241 Mark Schroeder 95112 2026-04-17 02:32:14.216799+00 242 Katja Irvin 95116 2026-04-17 03:34:38.427165+00
243 Patricia Segarini 95125 2026-04-19 23:12:24.229+00 244 Linda Ross 95138 2026-04-17 06:34:15.725+00
245 Kathy Tran 95117 2026-04-15 23:51:36.417134+00
246 george vargas 95121 2026-04-18 20:35:33.376+00
247 Steven Blechman 95008 2026-04-18 23:50:01.933+00
248 Carl Valencia 95035 2026-04-17 08:14:14.575+00
249 Georgette Baumgartner 95111 2026-04-16 05:53:25.331805+00 250 Paty murillo 95121 2026-04-17 03:04:04.326795+00
251 Helen Martinez 95122 2026-04-18 00:58:42.762+00
252 Michelle Wan 95133 2026-04-16 03:17:40.262834+00
253 Aqua Ma 95112 2026-04-16 16:23:54.388946+00
254 Ari Elovson 94022 2026-04-19 13:21:11.627+00
255 Claire Bokor 95120 2026-04-17 14:03:46.737+00
256 Peggy Ozuna 95120 2026-04-16 22:11:58.67845+00
257 Vivian Frobish 54911 2026-04-18 00:35:01.884+00
258 HOlly Shen 95123 2026-04-15 23:31:02.327391+00
259 Nicole Vidmar 95120 2026-04-15 23:40:09.06832+00
260 Aubrey Wilson 95124 2026-04-18 02:39:56.507+00
261 Yajaira Pulido 95111 2026-04-18 23:24:48.473+00
262 Sebastian Rivera 95122 2026-04-21 04:46:19.852+00
263 Anh Vu 95148 2026-04-18 01:41:50.441+00
264 Tiffany Cleveland-
Lopes
95135 2026-04-19 21:17:42.077+00
265 Claudia Francisco 95008 2026-04-20 04:23:13.253+00
266 Adrian Olivo 95112 2026-04-16 22:23:46.897264+00
267 Christine Le 94040 2026-04-21 11:14:33.177+00
268 Briana Fujiii 95111 2026-04-16 22:34:55.651227+00
269 Madison Rubia 95037 2026-04-20 23:52:54.781+00
270 Diana Nguyen 95111 2026-04-17 00:05:00.079397+00
271 STEFAN GUTH 95037 2026-04-16 23:42:22.670177+00
272 Kristen Masukawa 95116 2026-04-17 20:29:31.668+00
273 Cheyanne Reilly 95126 2026-04-21 09:47:42.987+00
274 Cristian Pearson 95130 2026-04-21 00:42:45.498+00
275 Jennifer Ellies 95125 2026-04-19 22:48:10.992+00
276 Yvonne Woodworth 95118 2026-04-21 02:29:06.782+00
277 Cynthia Boman 95139 2026-04-17 01:38:51.354504+00
278 Jasmine Zamora Salas 95407 2026-04-16 21:29:38.179476+00 279 Kenia Carreon 95136 2026-04-16 22:03:29.453656+00
280 Nicole Bang 95118 2026-04-16 14:44:15.717425+00
281 Betsy Rael 95123 2026-04-18 16:21:45.684+00
282 Debra Houston 95118 2026-04-20 00:24:23.712+00
283 Kira Sedayao 95054 2026-04-21 06:55:16.556+00
284 Mars Lahann 95035 2026-04-16 07:31:55.757905+00
285 Heather Hanson 95136 2026-04-17 04:22:09.737+00
286 Ernest Gargas 95123 2026-04-18 05:02:06.39+00
287 Liz Contreras 95123 2026-04-16 22:44:35.512056+00
288 Lace Lancaster 95136 2026-04-17 08:22:58.155+00
289 Bhuvana Betini 95148 2026-04-17 03:17:48.071895+00
290 Marci Thurston 95123 2026-04-20 14:49:50.276+00
291 Victoria Lopez 95126 2026-04-16 00:04:07.390483+00
292 Mariah Anderson 95130 2026-04-21 00:41:51.744+00
293 Leslie Alvarez 95122 2026-04-19 21:25:42.823+00
294 andrea villegas 95131 2026-04-17 15:20:10.615+00
295 Shreya Vasanth Kumar 95118 2026-04-16 18:20:32.36594+00 296 Angelina Twist 95127 2026-04-16 02:31:14.161397+00
297 Arnold Wikey 95122 2026-04-19 20:45:25.094+00
298 Julie Whittington 94087 2026-04-20 01:46:10.068+00
299 Ellis Shahin 95123 2026-04-20 04:32:16.441+00
300 Andrea DeLeon 95125 2026-04-21 04:06:51.874+00
301 Julia Shah 95119 2026-04-18 02:07:48.56+00
302 Alyne Hazard 95124 2026-04-18 23:20:25.125+00
303 Preston McPeak 95124 2026-04-19 16:33:35.076+00
304 Swathi R 95119 2026-04-17 05:33:42.044+00
305 Cheri K 95124 2026-04-16 14:42:35.366298+00
306 Kasturi Malaviya 95119 2026-04-17 05:14:56.084+00
307 Marjorie Siegel 95135 2026-04-16 00:50:12.03383+00
308 Magnolia Morris 95126 2026-04-20 23:21:48.947+00
309 Matthew Medina-Alvarez 95132 2026-04-20 23:12:11.195+00 310 Mel Aberin 95133 2026-04-17 00:27:27.108474+00
311 Christina Deras 95135 2026-04-19 23:36:30.841+00
312 Myrna Mungal 95014 2026-04-20 21:36:01.26+00
313 Dai Luong 95135 2026-04-19 02:52:28.884+00
314 Valery Gonzalez 95110 2026-04-20 00:11:23.38+00
315 Jennifer Braun 95126 2026-04-21 03:40:03.776+00
316 Martin Martinez 90804 2026-04-17 06:07:03.951+00
317 Sherry Wells 95037 2026-04-17 03:43:38.491787+00
318 Joanna Acevedo 95128 2026-04-15 22:26:03.202001+00
319 Stephanie Barajas 95112 2026-04-16 00:37:13.809077+00 320 Audrey Wang 95120 2026-04-21 13:54:22.717+00
321 Emily Anderson 95136 2026-04-21 05:13:52.733+00
322 Viridiana Romero 95112 2026-04-16 05:32:10.818078+00 323 Fred Liang 94025 2026-04-16 00:37:55.517988+00
324 Paritosh Malaviya 94024 2026-04-18 01:18:09.186+00
325 Kyle Aaron Papas 95121 2026-04-17 17:10:23.57+00
326 Janine Nguyen 95132 2026-04-19 22:27:01.603+00
327 Katie Mariucci 95130 2026-04-21 00:27:58.644+00
328 Gina Montarano 94116 2026-04-16 23:29:35.479857+00
329 sofia berberis 95132 2026-04-18 03:01:14.243+00
330 Jillian Harrell 95135 2026-04-21 06:08:20.46+00
331 Barry Weingarten 95148 2026-04-17 04:46:05.855+00
332 Ethan Maruyama 95035 2026-04-21 07:10:19.106+00
333 Malyne Hazard 95125 2026-04-19 04:28:29.353+00
334 Alyssa Wigant 95112 2026-04-15 22:03:51.775112+00
335 Laurie Alaimo 95112 2026-04-16 01:10:35.765622+00
336 Zachary Zachau 95113 2026-04-16 23:21:19.426018+00
337 Esperanza Cobian 95119 2026-04-17 00:15:11.846597+00 338 Jessica Gutierrez 95112 2026-04-16 04:57:55.949154+00 339 Aster Lech 90007 2026-04-20 07:17:45.476+00
340 Kimiko Ramirez 91204 2026-04-17 05:41:53.856+00
341 JAZMIN ROSILLO 94806 2026-04-19 21:33:52.336+00
342 Lindsay Silva 95046 2026-04-16 20:07:25.524981+00
343 Evangeline Reynolds 95121 2026-04-20 06:54:31.529+00 344 Rafael Baez 95118 2026-04-15 22:56:44.031726+00
345 Valecita Taylor 95138 2026-04-17 02:28:23.595458+00 346 Kimberly Saxton-
Heinrichs
95008 2026-04-19 05:17:02.134+00
347 Jennifer Johanson 95126 2026-04-21 01:40:24.626+00
348 Ash S 95120 2026-04-21 02:47:08.802+00
349 Matt King 95110 2026-04-15 15:50:17.030993+00
350 lori McQuiddy 95119 2026-04-16 21:26:31.764963+00
351 Amber Hale 95119 2026-04-20 23:07:49.17+00
352 Jessica Kwong 95130 2026-04-15 22:06:19.029896+00
353 Jaimey Misajon 95121 2026-04-18 23:23:35.368+00
354 Celeste Meneses 95148 2026-04-16 17:39:03.798798+00 355 John Rowe 95112 2026-04-16 05:52:54.529185+00
356 Sage Zeltser 95112 2026-04-18 01:11:59.414+00
357 Makkenah Dottai 95816 2026-04-17 15:48:27.572+00
358 Annie Abundiz 95127 2026-04-16 23:29:20.29715+00
359 Marduke Yousefpor 95120 2026-04-17 00:48:57.468141+00 360 Loretta Brackett 95121 2026-04-17 05:47:05.192+00
361 Gerald Grayson 95136 2026-04-20 00:06:18.633+00
362 Suzanne Magno 95131 2026-04-18 16:22:19.352+00
363 Kathie Wright 95037 2026-04-16 21:54:14.51794+00
364 Lynda Munoz 95118 2026-04-19 22:04:45.11+00
365 Sandra Rowe 95130 2026-04-21 01:08:09.968+00
366 Thomas Fortunak 94587 2026-04-21 03:41:57.943+00
367 Azucena Molina 95126 2026-04-21 04:31:26.322+00
368 Kenneth Nguyen 95112 2026-04-20 04:30:25.855+00
369 Kaylin Potgieter 95002 2026-04-19 15:12:02.811+00
370 Shaf Khan 95138 2026-04-17 21:59:23.878+00
371 Cassandra Valentin 95123 2026-04-16 00:44:26.680845+00 372 Ganeev Dhaliwal 95050 2026-04-20 04:50:36.337+00
373 Devon McNaughton 95112 2026-04-16 01:04:33.862009+00 374 Michelle Tran 95122 2026-04-17 06:13:46.149+00
375 Andrea Luna 95123 2026-04-16 16:09:45.769039+00
376 Hemily A 95076 2026-04-18 06:23:05.072+00
377 Fernando Cruz-Esparza 95112 2026-04-19 00:01:47.533+00 378 Jason Switkes 95117 2026-04-19 19:29:02.298+00
379 Kara Schlindwein 95125 2026-04-20 23:01:37.47+00
380 Maria pimentel 95122 2026-04-19 07:15:12.62+00
381 Mandy Zavala 95117 2026-04-20 16:06:22.403+00
382 Sarah MacInnes 95120 2026-04-18 05:33:37.543+00
383 SHAN Pannu 95135 2026-04-21 08:01:12.198+00
384 Eve Gamero 95112 2026-04-16 01:50:35.147239+00
385 Elsa Wang 95136 2026-04-16 04:52:05.252478+00
386 Kaitlin Milliken 95133 2026-04-20 14:40:13.296+00
387 Deborah Jamison 95014 2026-04-20 22:50:38.658+00
388 Patrina Rodan 95835 2026-04-18 05:35:46.063+00
389 Charlene Carter 95125 2026-04-19 23:41:46.05+00
390 Isabelle E 95014 2026-04-17 19:58:10.469+00
391 GEORGE CIMINO 95123 2026-04-18 13:21:24.43+00
392 Bobby Patel 95123 2026-04-20 00:22:57.207+00
393 Aymie Dang 95134 2026-04-16 21:49:45.873566+00
394 Lana Gomez 95129 2026-04-15 23:26:55.824893+00
395 Rose N 94709 2026-04-21 05:09:27.34+00
396 Ganga Pradeep 97003 2026-04-17 04:21:09.002+00
397 Cherry Buds 94509 2026-04-21 13:05:36.338+00
398 Darlene Vossbrinck 95138 2026-04-17 14:38:24.07+00
399 Catherine Terry 95051 2026-04-17 02:38:24.48871+00
400 Deven Mendoza 95125 2026-04-16 22:33:46.564328+00
401 Keiana Andino 95125 2026-04-17 20:47:28.716+00
402 Sreenivas Andra 95148 2026-04-16 21:59:46.794736+00 403 Texie Darnell 95123 2026-04-17 05:19:10.466+00
404 Amy Chang 95122 2026-04-21 07:25:23.429+00
405 Julie Tran 95112 2026-04-21 07:02:14.414+00
406 Trung Vinh 95135 2026-04-17 03:15:13.623352+00
407 Patricia Rolland 95136 2026-04-21 01:11:55.062+00
408 Ruby Melgoza 95122 2026-04-19 16:37:02.258+00
409 Jaimie Imanil 95138 2026-04-17 02:20:15.841184+00
410 Noah cruz hernandez 95014 2026-04-20 20:34:39.859+00 411 Beverly Phillips 95120 2026-04-20 15:51:57.376+00
412 Michelle Amador 95122 2026-04-16 17:27:33.75449+00
413 Kathleen Allen 95121 2026-04-19 06:14:00.977+00
414 Juliet Hamak 95126 2026-04-21 00:37:02.102+00
415 Tiffany Lam 95138 2026-04-21 04:01:39.347+00
416 Marguerite Cardinal 95125 2026-04-21 07:14:01.685+00 417 Danny Martin 95124 2026-04-21 07:01:55.56+00
418 Jazzy Garcia 95110 2026-04-18 06:10:42.466+00
419 Elise Tavella 95118 2026-04-21 01:56:24.885+00
420 Dianna Diaz 95110 2026-04-16 03:18:27.992822+00
421 Karie Fraley 95112 2026-04-16 19:08:18.929979+00
422 Keenan Flagg 95124 2026-04-21 00:05:08.658+00
423 Hannah Yamanishi 95120 2026-04-21 07:04:02.325+00
424 Andy Ha 95120 2026-04-17 21:29:35.45+00
425 Key Atticus 91501 2026-04-18 15:01:02.547+00
426 Briana Pimentel 95148 2026-04-18 06:13:51.831+00
427 Holly Barr 95125 2026-04-19 21:06:26.811+00
428 Kristi Lynden 95126 2026-04-20 23:29:55.687+00
429 Stephanie Haney 95128 2026-04-21 04:52:39.89+00
430 Delilah Roa 95123 2026-04-16 15:36:35.749688+00
431 Emilia Bobst 95020 2026-04-15 21:59:04.455029+00
432 Silas Jones 95124 2026-04-21 07:12:23.574+00
433 Mary Massar 95843 2026-04-21 03:14:29.334+00
434 Jacinda Santos 95112 2026-04-17 04:02:43.411413+00
435 Rosa Ortiz 95127 2026-04-16 16:31:37.137729+00
436 Justin Robinson 95128 2026-04-16 03:25:21.464887+00 437 Mary Redigan 95127 2026-04-19 09:21:01.302+00
438 Lilliana Aguirre 95825 2026-04-17 08:29:22.466+00
439 Mica Vo 95123 2026-04-17 03:40:48.739452+00
440 Mateo Rodriguez-Deal 95116 2026-04-21 07:12:16.809+00 441 Shalmali Rajadhyax 95124 2026-04-18 14:56:10.965+00 442 Ketaki Malaviya 95124 2026-04-17 13:26:44.679+00
443 Bernadette Gasga gasga 95112 2026-04-16 00:56:23.959121+00 444 Angela Perteet 95112 2026-04-17 04:26:16.186+00
445 Emma Tao 95014 2026-04-21 04:23:01.82+00
446 Angela Aiosa 95008 2026-04-16 17:17:14.292662+00
447 Michele Quanz 95110 2026-04-21 13:49:52.872+00
448 Christine Mitchell 95123 2026-04-17 15:57:03.083+00 449 Jacob Pliego 95111 2026-04-18 21:20:28.263+00
450 Carole Paquette Myjak 95123 2026-04-17 18:24:14.431+00 451 Angela Mendoza
Dorantes
95148 2026-04-18 01:31:32.948+00
452 Noelle Andrade 95136 2026-04-16 01:41:14.451137+00
453 elizabeth schroeder 95112 2026-04-20 16:18:10.483+00 454 Florence Anderson 95119 2026-04-16 21:28:11.143236+00 455 Kaitlyn Holland 91605 2026-04-21 10:56:42.085+00
456 Sheri Rozario 95121 2026-04-18 15:31:17.648+00
457 Antonio Mendoza 95111 2026-04-16 14:00:12.236275+00 458 Priti Desai 95120 2026-04-19 04:52:10.107+00
459 Valeria Lopez 94580 2026-04-21 04:35:43.283+00
460 John Rodney 91607 2026-04-19 21:40:22.311+00
461 Mary Webb 95118 2026-04-17 00:57:10.322394+00
462 Angelica Rangel 95110 2026-04-16 00:40:08.744715+00 463 Sarah Scullion 95125 2026-04-21 00:19:33.982+00
464 Krista Hamby 95112 2026-04-16 15:06:09.069969+00
465 Renae McCollum 95125 2026-04-16 19:27:33.383349+00 466 Kimberly Pollock 95112 2026-04-16 03:04:30.023982+00 467 Terra Standish 95124 2026-04-21 14:16:15.619+00
468 Jayleen Li 94110 2026-04-17 00:35:24.8806+00
469 Adrienne Krawetz 95037 2026-04-17 15:49:14.163+00
470 Julio Perez 95119 2026-04-16 03:54:35.967085+00
471 Ashley Overhouse 95126 2026-04-21 01:57:07.071+00
472 Mary Bravo 95126 2026-04-17 03:40:08.681487+00
473 Sheela Saini 95127 2026-04-21 02:19:34.119+00
474 Ambika N 95124 2026-04-19 05:40:05.59+00
475 Luis Bustamante 95139 2026-04-17 20:14:59.597+00
476 Fang Dai 95131 2026-04-15 23:24:31.444196+00
477 Sachin Bhargava 95135 2026-04-17 06:10:15.244+00
478 Khyati Gupta 95139 2026-04-18 02:57:45.884+00
479 Mitchell Eberly 95136 2026-04-19 17:16:27.853+00
480 Chetan Surpur 95119 2026-04-17 23:54:56.989+00
481 Sara Chen 94566 2026-04-17 18:36:07.691+00
482 Prasanna Seshadri 95118 2026-04-20 06:47:59.268+00 483 Pamela Leonard 95119 2026-04-18 14:01:17.779+00
484 Medha Vashi 95120 2026-04-17 00:41:13.333886+00
485 Nikolas Sanchez 95121 2026-04-17 21:30:34.934+00
486 Melissa Le-Lewis 95126 2026-04-16 16:29:43.574538+00 487 Ekaterina Efimova 95113 2026-04-16 13:28:10.611601+00 488 Daron Story 95119 2026-04-17 15:30:56.751+00
489 Binh Tran 95132 2026-04-17 22:47:19.594+00
490 Claudine Belulia 95127 2026-04-19 05:38:57.06+00
491 Karen Herr 95123 2026-04-17 00:30:55.911714+00
492 Rebecca Eliscu 94025 2026-04-19 00:07:54.941+00
493 Elaine Chen 95129 2026-04-17 03:40:00.831084+00
494 Sergio Trejo 95119 2026-04-17 05:15:07.247+00
495 maximiliano flores 95127 2026-04-18 19:53:53.524+00 496 Praneetha Potiny 95135 2026-04-16 02:23:29.060652+00 497 Lizzie Miller 95124 2026-04-16 20:56:31.768365+00
498 Mailé Lazarin 60610 2026-04-16 19:43:16.253695+00
499 Humberto Brito 95139 2026-04-17 02:49:49.229978+00
500 Anu S 95123 2026-04-16 22:21:01.543562+00
501 Stacey Kellogg 95123 2026-04-17 18:29:56.981+00
502 Conner Holsopple 13210 2026-04-21 12:39:51.061+00
503 Veronica Leon 95124 2026-04-19 21:21:01.985+00
504 Susan Chang 95110 2026-04-16 07:28:45.942178+00
505 Romina Karim 95138 2026-04-17 16:01:01.026+00
506 Jonathan Lee 95616 2026-04-21 04:27:42.618+00
507 Kayla Cuvelier 95110 2026-04-21 14:21:35.425+00
508 Carrie Maietta 95125 2026-04-21 07:17:47.203+00
509 evelyn Madden 95123 2026-04-17 22:08:02.51+00
510 Franklin Lee 95129 2026-04-16 22:57:51.01909+00
511 Krista Woodward 95125 2026-04-20 04:23:51.894+00
512 Karen Keith 95138 2026-04-16 21:34:42.386875+00
513 Charlotte Wilkie 95051 2026-04-16 20:09:24.830944+00 514 Kylie Borges 95112 2026-04-16 03:26:53.447854+00
515 Charlotte Dickson 95135 2026-04-17 04:28:39.22+00
516 Caity Tucker 4106 2026-04-18 00:46:25.285+00
517 roberto uribe 95050 2026-04-16 22:36:06.68711+00
518 Devanshi Mehta 94536 2026-04-17 00:52:14.310884+00
519 J Pierce 95136 2026-04-20 01:01:32.395+00
520 Sasha Klamm 95120 2026-04-17 00:02:37.586044+00
521 Maria Charron 95112 2026-04-16 03:29:19.056469+00
522 Barbara Gallaty 95139 2026-04-17 01:19:52.430519+00 523 Cera Renault 95123 2026-04-20 18:36:33.2+00
524 Vir Grewal 95118 2026-04-16 13:00:46.251887+00
525 Annmarie Truong 95112 2026-04-21 11:21:55.512+00
526 Rose Jaquez 95127 2026-04-17 16:59:10.505+00
527 Delmy Reyes 95136 2026-04-20 20:17:26.284+00
528 Stephanie Chung 95050 2026-04-16 21:25:27.247476+00 529 Jane Tu 95118 2026-04-18 23:55:20.38+00
530 Carrie Walton 95032 2026-04-19 08:14:45.648+00
531 Colin Gong 95035 2026-04-16 21:06:36.833156+00
532 Pedro Arenas 95112 2026-04-16 21:39:06.929752+00
533 Ivan Axelson 95119 2026-04-17 06:05:58.976+00
534 Jade Frank 95124 2026-04-21 13:35:51.717+00
535 Jennifer LaBreche 95125 2026-04-16 15:16:06.824467+00 536 Lusi Wang 95035 2026-04-19 17:27:35.023+00
537 Susi Baillif 95120 2026-04-17 15:59:53.339+00
538 Andy Nguyen 94901 2026-04-18 02:39:56.846+00
539 Lisa Grisalin 95120 2026-04-17 03:22:52.246384+00
540 Susan Nguyen 95121 2026-04-17 01:51:57.805975+00
541 Robert Chin 94087 2026-04-18 23:21:52.209+00
542 NICHOLLE MORECI 95135 2026-04-17 16:51:30.3+00
543 Patricia Tran 95135 2026-04-17 02:36:11.122071+00
544 Carrie Genise 95120 2026-04-17 10:52:50.256+00
545 Nina Chuang 95112 2026-04-21 02:40:34.712+00
546 Erika Lawson 95119 2026-04-17 02:34:07.885732+00
547 Sherly Mathew 95037 2026-04-17 13:51:34.287+00
548 Anthony Cortez 95128 2026-04-16 03:08:31.759949+00
549 Uriah Wilkins 95118 2026-04-20 01:41:11.039+00
550 Carlos Ortiz 95050 2026-04-21 03:27:52.139+00
551 Kristie Nguyen 95116 2026-04-15 20:45:46.367623+00
552 Kaory Santillan 95112 2026-04-16 00:34:29.577952+00 553 Berk Harmandar 7100 2026-04-21 05:47:41.803+00
554 Sneha Chandrakanth 95124 2026-04-16 14:04:30.839699+00 555 Leyla Carleo 95126 2026-04-15 22:24:44.951172+00
556 Jesssica Smith 95120 2026-04-17 13:42:05.089+00
557 Rebecca Tannous 95139 2026-04-19 21:57:14.658+00
558 Anthony Martinez 95116 2026-04-18 21:15:48.873+00
559 Jordan Moldow 95112 2026-04-16 17:09:13.62754+00
560 Caitlin McElroy 95073 2026-04-21 13:13:10.376+00
561 Erin Adkins 95126 2026-04-19 22:48:38.787+00
562 Ben Cornelius 95126 2026-04-16 13:34:24.350866+00
563 Brynn Angelo 95666 2026-04-16 21:25:52.633496+00
564 Amy Heintz 95125 2026-04-18 22:41:15.949+00
565 Chad Treece 95123 2026-04-21 03:29:01.294+00
566 Paul Dennig 95135 2026-04-18 03:50:25.038+00
567 Marcy Powers 95037 2026-04-17 01:14:11.122309+00
568 Icess Prieto 92507 2026-04-17 02:21:12.06034+00
569 Lori Schultz Range 95123 2026-04-17 16:59:32.863+00 570 Michele Mashburn 95134 2026-04-20 02:10:32.412+00
571 Ana Manrique de
Sevilla
95037 2026-04-19 00:43:56.446+00
572 Berta Wiebe 95122 2026-04-19 23:32:53.347+00
573 Shawna Lai 95125 2026-04-19 23:08:48.076+00
574 Ingrid Velasquez 95126 2026-04-20 12:47:14.708+00
575 Kohaku Sumida 95125 2026-04-21 06:21:38.434+00
576 Amy Tran 95133 2026-04-19 17:42:54.877+00
577 Ariel Nadratowski 95110 2026-04-20 20:52:18.461+00
578 Leslie Gill 95118 2026-04-20 02:59:15.01+00
579 Anne Nguyen 95132 2026-04-20 17:49:44.476+00
580 Emily Hendon 95125 2026-04-21 13:45:54.006+00
581 Alexander Elsorady 95123 2026-04-16 14:32:54.915499+00 582 Jennifer Hirsch 95014 2026-04-16 16:01:43.897191+00 583 Jo Ann Gallo 95128 2026-04-19 21:45:51.606+00
584 Mariaa H 95133 2026-04-18 15:06:35.088+00
585 Sophia Mahoney-Rohrl 94002 2026-04-16 14:55:10.979496+00 586 Jacqueline Whistler 95139 2026-04-16 16:17:31.699311+00 587 Andrea Auduong 95119 2026-04-18 16:07:47.132+00
588 Aditya Parige 95135 2026-04-16 18:27:30.526474+00
589 Raji Malaviya 95124 2026-04-17 05:30:08.748+00
590 Athena Genise 95120 2026-04-17 03:00:12.497668+00
591 Malavvika Kulashekar 95032 2026-04-17 04:53:42.628+00 592 jayssielisa haynes 95116 2026-04-15 22:31:43.376801+00 593 Justin Sinn 95124 2026-04-16 16:37:11.260977+00
594 asher brenner 94954 2026-04-21 03:39:08.715+00
595 Jerrie Au 95111 2026-04-21 11:38:42.332+00
596 Serina Murillo 95127 2026-04-19 15:00:48.23+00
597 Luz Santos 95116 2026-04-18 23:49:43.429+00
598 Darra Velasco 95127 2026-04-20 04:23:42.163+00
599 Dj Sullivan 95125 2026-04-20 21:27:54.16+00
600 Katelyn Ho 95132 2026-04-21 06:24:37.749+00
601 Susan Minor 95139 2026-04-17 03:21:02.434846+00
602 Samantha Wilairat 95125 2026-04-19 21:49:21.003+00
603 maya changaran 95128 2026-04-17 14:37:16.283+00
604 Charron Myers 95110 2026-04-16 00:05:25.079343+00
605 Jiro Claveria 95054 2026-04-16 16:03:26.862133+00
606 Elizabeth Salas Sanchez 95111 2026-04-21 08:07:26.25+00 607 Wayne J Gramza 95123 2026-04-19 14:40:47.629+00
608 Leah Phipps 95139 2026-04-17 04:55:44.231+00
609 Trang Chu 95138 2026-04-17 02:12:16.86661+00
610 Emily Engle 95136 2026-04-16 05:03:37.538239+00
611 Natasha Rossi 95014 2026-04-20 00:20:13.525+00
612 Lucia Romero 95126 2026-04-15 21:30:04.895083+00
613 Jasper Ho 95123 2026-04-17 01:59:19.442227+00
614 Noel Morrill 95120 2026-04-17 00:57:57.596061+00
615 Vanessa Palafox 95138 2026-04-20 23:36:17.298+00
616 chiara seim 95008 2026-04-19 06:38:27.409+00
617 Kimberly Kay 95008 2026-04-20 02:13:15.868+00
618 Reva Raul 94566 2026-04-16 05:28:28.794923+00
619 Finch Banning 1473 2026-04-21 14:00:28.518+00
620 Lydia McClure 95120 2026-04-17 02:12:33.219481+00
621 singi tan 95123 2026-04-16 20:36:25.63731+00
622 Alison Peters 95126 2026-04-21 13:45:06.47+00
623 Jennifer Ahn 95112 2026-04-16 14:38:48.288044+00
624 Melissa Lauzon 95136 2026-04-18 23:23:27.083+00
625 Robert Brackett 95121 2026-04-17 05:49:12.808+00
626 gloria gloria 95111 2026-04-18 19:49:47.263+00
627 Donna Hamane 94089 2026-04-16 16:48:39.769612+00
628 Rachael Chamberlain 95139 2026-04-16 16:35:48.356539+00 629 Traci Monroe Valdez 95037 2026-04-18 14:26:06.042+00 630 Maira Ramos 95131 2026-04-17 03:52:50.666593+00
631 Veronica Tapia 95129 2026-04-16 01:38:23.844206+00
632 Sara Quijada 94025 2026-04-17 20:35:40.714+00
633 Arturo Bravo 95116 2026-04-17 03:40:48.567507+00
634 Jennifer Slattery 95130 2026-04-21 03:48:36.29+00
635 peng ng 95002 2026-04-19 15:27:53.218+00
636 Suzi Hough 95124 2026-04-19 23:14:31.26+00
637 Meghan Wandrocke 95120 2026-04-19 21:25:49.154+00
638 Danny Le 95136 2026-04-15 22:52:50.908837+00
639 sreekanth ramani 95135 2026-04-18 18:38:00.571+00
640 Roberto Flores 95123 2026-04-20 21:48:33.089+00
641 stacey winters 95120 2026-04-21 08:54:15.132+00
642 Ezikio Serna 95123 2026-04-20 20:57:19.788+00
643 Kaleigh Kailani 91302 2026-04-20 00:48:07.76+00
644 Dana Padilla 95037 2026-04-17 21:06:40.861+00
645 Aanchal Malaviya 94551 2026-04-18 01:25:23.435+00
646 Althea Elaine Jaug 95132 2026-04-16 22:51:02.75886+00 647 Sarita Starks 94587 2026-04-20 14:23:14.326+00
648 James A 92831 2026-04-16 20:40:58.598554+00
649 Jenn Ramage 95124 2026-04-19 21:54:30.403+00
650 Steven Fleming 95112 2026-04-19 09:22:59.787+00
651 Mallikarjun Murag 95136 2026-04-19 14:57:10.865+00 652 Kapil Kumar 95120 2026-04-17 19:23:31.679+00
653 Breanna Hamm 94612 2026-04-16 02:18:12.509957+00
654 Barbara Lindsay 95136 2026-04-17 15:06:34.203+00
655 Lucy Moctezuma 95130 2026-04-21 04:57:00.722+00
656 Dublin Paxman 95032 2026-04-17 04:52:04.232+00
657 Bridget Nixon 95125 2026-04-19 17:35:10.807+00
658 Hanh Nguyen 95125 2026-04-19 18:09:15.839+00
659 Anna Fox 95125 2026-04-18 04:59:41.39+00
660 Victor Estrada 95124 2026-04-16 13:45:28.130795+00
661 Bernardita Palavecino-
Prado
95125 2026-04-16 05:21:27.93068+00
662 Sarah Steiner 95128 2026-04-21 13:29:09.297+00
663 Emma Hartung 95128 2026-04-21 07:23:27.693+00
664 Frank Cantu 95118 2026-04-19 23:34:40.517+00
665 Grace Frahm 95111 2026-04-20 21:14:41.131+00
666 Elizabeth Cacciaroni 95138 2026-04-17 01:06:01.365004+00 667 Rachelle Kim 95131 2026-04-17 23:41:18.804+00
668 Carolan Dosik 95125 2026-04-19 21:35:20.805+00
669 Millie Del carmen 95126 2026-04-15 22:52:00.146376+00 670 Espy acevedo 95132 2026-04-15 22:40:24.812352+00
671 Lisa Ascarie 95112 2026-04-16 18:31:54.127874+00
672 Kieran Alcumbrac 95139 2026-04-17 14:15:27.332+00
673 Ernest Gonzales 95127 2026-04-21 14:21:14.051+00
674 Hannah McCleney 30066 2026-04-21 04:30:15.995+00
675 Luz Zamora 95112 2026-04-17 01:58:19.076378+00
676 MC Mendonca 94539 2026-04-16 04:45:26.695497+00
677 Kaylee Homer 95033 2026-04-17 15:30:55.922+00
678 Constance Button 95112 2026-04-15 23:30:33.356518+00 679 Cathy Weselby 95112 2026-04-21 14:16:28.688+00
680 Daniele McCollum 95123 2026-04-19 00:01:24.365+00
681 Vanessa Pena Morales 95125 2026-04-17 09:04:52.468+00 682 Ella Sawyer 95123 2026-04-15 23:02:38.456334+00
683 Michael Gallo 95139 2026-04-17 17:33:21.63+00
684 Valeria Castaneda 95127 2026-04-16 03:35:46.508725+00 685 Kenya Bautista 95126 2026-04-16 23:34:38.009171+00
686 Kasandra StegerDattilo 95125 2026-04-19 23:08:46.707+00 687 Joyce Miller 95119 2026-04-17 00:29:47.324211+00
688 Ellie Powell 71030 2026-04-21 09:38:16.742+00
689 Lauren McDermott 91304 2026-04-17 04:56:48.729+00
690 Michelle Wan 95133 2026-04-16 03:19:30.19506+00
691 Yanelly De La Rosa 95116 2026-04-21 03:17:01.353+00 692 Alyssarhaye Graciano 95110 2026-04-16 01:04:34.474001+00
693 Ronald Nealy 94086 2026-04-21 14:09:43.625+00
694 Karen Correa Meza 95403 2026-04-18 02:38:43.513+00
695 Marek Pearse 95136 2026-04-19 23:41:09.676+00
696 Olivia Lai 95123 2026-04-18 17:57:38.143+00
697 Elva Carrillo 95133 2026-04-16 16:24:51.809684+00
698 Teresa Ponikvar 95128 2026-04-16 01:43:15.966917+00 699 Amy Chen 95112 2026-04-17 05:47:32.091+00
700 Dylan Perez 95119 2026-04-16 03:53:37.315723+00
701 Casey Kennedy 95116 2026-04-18 23:36:13.415+00
702 Karen Lynn 95126 2026-04-16 15:26:47.031388+00
703 Shanti Nagwani 95118 2026-04-15 22:59:53.89335+00
704 John Callan 95120 2026-04-20 16:32:29.817+00
705 Aureen Chowdhury 95135 2026-04-16 00:35:55.928728+00 706 Isabella Jaravata 95112 2026-04-16 06:00:43.49044+00 707 Steven Schulz 95126 2026-04-16 08:32:11.189635+00
708 Pattijean Blackmore 95123 2026-04-19 22:46:15.557+00 709 Emily Moncada 95119 2026-04-21 03:06:05.375+00
710 Jennifer Ma 95127 2026-04-16 00:35:42.234073+00
711 David Madrigal 95122 2026-04-16 17:40:21.215+00
712 Esther Ketvirtis 94521 2026-04-21 04:06:10.474+00
713 Cynthia Huynh 95376 2026-04-17 00:21:19.236976+00
714 Michelle Berg 95117 2026-04-21 03:15:48.754+00
715 Soomin Song 95133 2026-04-18 18:26:10.017+00
716 Monique Serrano 95125 2026-04-17 03:33:56.122826+00 717 Felipe Romero 95110 2026-04-15 21:29:22.625055+00
718 Kimber Davis 95120 2026-04-19 20:31:11.952+00
719 Colleen Ha 95822 2026-04-18 07:44:38.228+00
720 Tammi Chan 95132 2026-04-20 21:10:40.903+00
721 M. Newton 94530 2026-04-20 05:40:53.374+00
722 K T 94127 2026-04-20 03:38:50.562+00
723 Kaitlin Miller 94566 2026-04-16 18:23:44.29117+00
724 Hana Tello 95126 2026-04-16 18:56:58.119438+00
725 Kathleen A Lechner 95135 2026-04-20 01:16:49.901+00 726 Amy Guzules 95123 2026-04-16 20:29:25.906772+00
727 Lisa Gee 95123 koenigindeseises+ 2026-04-17 04:50:56.472+00 728 Aixa Ortiz 95064 2026-04-21 03:16:04.255+00
729 Red Sharma 94086 2026-04-18 04:18:39.311+00
730 Emily Krayn 94070 2026-04-20 04:16:40.436+00
731 Andrew Siegler 95112 2026-04-16 00:54:26.477078+00
732 Elizabeth Snavely 94015 2026-04-18 03:35:14.909+00 733 Kathleen Carvalho 95051 2026-04-21 12:35:54.242+00
734 SORIN FLOREA 95138 2026-04-16 23:03:22.804544+00
735 Jay Di 95110 2026-04-16 01:56:32.788703+00
736 isabel ortiz 95127 2026-04-16 23:07:07.089403+00
737 Veronica Romero 95124 2026-04-21 05:12:48.214+00
738 A. Chou 95135 2026-04-19 05:22:32.788+00
739 André Bonnand 75005 2026-04-21 10:59:24.037+00
740 Kate Everhardt 94086 2026-04-20 05:38:14.538+00
741 Michael Boyce 95051 2026-04-16 12:06:58.379086+00
742 Wesley Zhan 95148 2026-04-21 09:10:28.533+00
743 Vanessa Ramirez 95113 2026-04-16 04:43:49.979466+00 744 LORETTE KENNEY 95123 2026-04-17 18:56:01.115+00
745 Monica Colby 98843 2026-04-21 03:13:35.078+00
746 Jenny Huynh 95122 2026-04-17 05:35:19.317+00
747 Elaine Johnson 33602 2026-04-21 10:56:14.298+00
748 Courtney Connors 95125 2026-04-20 00:11:42.71+00
749 Mallory von Kugelgen 95112 2026-04-17 13:12:31.574+00 750 Dena Handel 95123 2026-04-19 21:16:15.318+00
751 Mia Choate 95148 2026-04-16 21:16:20.702647+00
752 Sabrina Watts 95113 2026-04-19 00:52:28.928+00
753 Danielle Pulido 95133 2026-04-15 21:59:03.447773+00 754 Sharlotte Omoletski 94085 2026-04-21 04:17:31.059+00 755 Jen Herchenroeder 95054 2026-04-20 20:08:54.968+00
756 Emily Liu-Elizabeth 95125 2026-04-19 22:50:12.244+00 757 Alyssa Miller-Vance 95037 2026-04-21 06:21:33.667+00 758 meryl imperial 95118 2026-04-17 01:17:05.681691+00 759 Meredith Pelrine 95112 2026-04-16 20:26:57.62615+00 760 RANDY HOUSTON 95118 2026-04-20 00:40:28.341+00
761 Jasma Sh 95138 2026-04-17 02:41:31.524431+00
762 Ellen Emerson 95139 2026-04-19 20:49:29.403+00
763 Emily Legaspi 94552 2026-04-17 06:01:12.829+00
764 Nic Peacock 95110 2026-04-15 23:23:29.718596+00
765 Emily Vanuy 95112 2026-04-17 16:48:54.592+00
766 AMELIA Bueno 95110 2026-04-19 22:42:44.326+00
767 Rebecca Ododa 95126 2026-04-21 03:29:16.012+00
768 David Acevedo 95127 2026-04-15 20:50:54.446538+00
769 ALEXANDRA FLOREA 95138 2026-04-16 23:03:36.903751+00 770 Jax Peled 95117 2026-04-18 02:28:51.919+00
771 Isaac Blouin 95136 2026-04-17 04:24:29.794+00
772 Ben Gunion 95110 2026-04-20 00:15:21.087+00
773 DIANA ZUBAC 95138 2026-04-16 23:03:55.365761+00
774 Lake Reyes Cabral 95112 2026-04-21 14:00:35.158+00 775 Geri Wittig 95112 2026-04-21 01:04:42.623+00
776 Nghi Tran 95123 2026-04-17 07:50:43.463+00
777 Tiffany C. 95121 2026-04-17 07:53:41.788+00
778 June Zhao 95014 2026-04-19 13:25:13.463+00
779 Allegra Watson 95124 2026-04-20 00:13:11.848+00
780 Caroline Nguyen 95133 2026-04-17 06:32:32.216+00
781 Elizabeth Franco-Lee 95123 2026-04-18 03:41:34.119+00 782 Kathryn Hedges 95062 2026-04-21 07:31:54.073+00
783 artemio vega 95012 2026-04-16 17:29:40.118548+00
784 Cenobio Perez 95126 2026-04-15 21:30:19.166166+00
785 Alicia Ruiz 95111 2026-04-17 20:44:37.416+00
786 Christine Francis 95119 2026-04-18 09:49:33.294+00
787 Monica Bajwa 95136 2026-04-16 19:14:21.434761+00
788 Veronica Castellon 95050 2026-04-17 22:34:27.902+00 789 Maylea Saito 95116 2026-04-15 23:49:58.724987+00
790 Jemina Cheyiam 95136 2026-04-18 22:20:26.821+00
791 Alexander Noffsinger 95124 2026-04-21 07:07:04.017+00 792 Ravi Sood 95136 2026-04-20 01:29:20.371+00
793 Kelly Learn 95125 2026-04-17 05:18:21.102+00
794 Thao Pham 94080 2026-04-17 06:31:49.273+00
795 Shailla Chand 95132 2026-04-20 20:53:02.864+00
796 Merlin Ling 95035 2026-04-21 07:26:11.163+00
797 Gladys Tran 95148 2026-04-15 20:02:55.749266+00
798 Alyssa Villa 95125 2026-04-16 15:55:24.548954+00
799 Chen Jiang 95138 2026-04-16 19:37:28.653155+00
800 Serena Mahan 95127 2026-04-17 23:07:06.705+00
801 Ashley Harer 95126 2026-04-21 14:08:41.359+00
802 Tiffany Howard 95136 2026-04-18 22:18:34.915+00
803 Janine Briones 95123 2026-04-20 22:12:49.938+00
804 Julie Sanchez 95148 2026-04-21 05:14:26.295+00
805 Andrew Kleidon 95133 2026-04-18 20:57:22.59+00
806 Guadalupe Marquez 95122 2026-04-17 03:21:59.223525+00 807 Aleks Plaza 95014 2026-04-16 16:33:19.911802+00
808 Lillian Homer 95033 2026-04-17 15:51:29.124+00
809 Zeina Maria 95123 2026-04-17 12:11:02.713+00
810 Jacob Bielski 60035 2026-04-21 05:25:51.1+00
811 Nicole Buchwald 95118 2026-04-19 22:50:27.465+00
812 Jessica Punzalan 95126 2026-04-16 01:33:57.817064+00 813 Diane Huffman 95126 2026-04-16 13:33:33.190944+00
814 John Thomas 95123 2026-04-17 15:43:37.036+00
815 Karina Barron 95133 2026-04-16 22:45:13.532207+00
816 Artemisa Bobst 95126 2026-04-15 20:56:33.781049+00 817 Annette Boyer 95125 2026-04-20 02:22:08.109+00
818 Marybelle Uk 95121 2026-04-17 14:54:08.256+00
819 Tachiya Bryant 95122 2026-04-16 21:48:48.242685+00
820 Mary Garcia 95111 2026-04-17 20:52:41.398+00
821 J Burchinal 95125 2026-04-21 01:36:21.558+00
822 Monica Siller 95139 2026-04-17 01:59:08.903081+00
823 carol christensen 95148 2026-04-18 11:12:37.167+00
824 Zoe Escorza 95116 2026-04-17 13:21:46.581+00
825 Leti James 94040 2026-04-18 16:02:40.015+00
826 Priscilla Nox Ngo 95148 2026-04-17 01:30:33.630576+00 827 Elisondo Alcantar 95129 2026-04-15 23:32:46.995487+00 828 Francisco Alvarez 95037 2026-04-16 20:54:30.612578+00 829 Katja Irvin 95116 2026-04-18 06:00:53.214+00
830 Mariza Villegas 95112 2026-04-21 04:15:19.262+00
831 Cynthia Toscano 95122 2026-04-16 16:30:44.184924+00 832 Viridiana Rodriguez 95116 2026-04-19 17:38:37.577+00 833 Ashish Keshan 95014 2026-04-17 13:30:49.559+00
834 Yolanda Rossy 95135 2026-04-20 21:30:34.982+00
835 Priscilla Rich 95116 2026-04-18 01:10:45.171+00
836 Tomas Y 95136 2026-04-17 03:49:18.633826+00
837 Preston Eberly 95119 2026-04-19 17:22:17.092+00
838 Mariel Hall 95120 2026-04-17 01:10:45.59564+00
839 Chris Strangio 95120 2026-04-18 00:55:25.455+00
840 Fariha Abedin 95051 2026-04-18 04:50:17.38+00
841 Raul Garcia 95116 2026-04-18 07:24:15.294+00
842 Jessica Embrey 95136 2026-04-17 13:42:27.292+00
843 Lisa W 95129 2026-04-18 06:40:01.191+00
844 Hanh Nguyen 95125 2026-04-17 18:21:23.403+00
845 Dana Lee 95138 2026-04-17 16:16:34.888+00
846 Lindsay Cimoli 95135 2026-04-17 02:37:13.61869+00
847 Martha Trejo 95121 2026-04-17 03:42:56.191621+00
848 Ashutosh Malaviya 95124 2026-04-18 00:04:15.34+00
849 Huan Pham 95136 2026-04-20 19:20:24.997+00
850 Mai-Ling LeChen 95050 2026-04-18 00:55:41.57+00
851 Michelle Wellington 95120 2026-04-19 00:29:13.766+00 852 Rene Duan 95123 2026-04-16 22:49:51.576231+00
853 Irina Guseva 95124 2026-04-19 22:52:55.813+00
854 Alaura Ann Trujillo 93210 2026-04-21 03:24:46.787+00 855 Lizzet FLORES 95132 2026-04-17 06:16:02.859+00
856 William Salgado 95132 2026-04-20 20:52:55.949+00
857 Melissa Estrada 95132 2026-04-17 08:16:03.603+00
858 Jenna Marvet 95126 2026-04-16 04:11:53.61064+00
859 Pankuri Sundra 95118 2026-04-16 12:59:08.24218+00
860 meredith leonard 95139 2026-04-20 12:53:44.337+00
861 Gordon Cheung 95131 2026-04-16 23:02:53.29398+00