RULES COMMITTEE: 8/19/2026
Item: B.1
File ID: ROGC 26-288
TO: Honorable Mayor & FROM: Toni J. Taber, MMC
City Council City Clerk
SUBJECT: The Public Record DATE: August 19, 2026
August 6, 2026 - August 13, 2026
ITEMS FILED FOR THE PUBLIC RECORD
Letters from Boards, Commissions, and Committees
Letters from the Public
1. Letter from Randi Maureen McMasters, received August 6, 2026, regarding: Formal Request for Simultaneous Evacuation Capacity Analysis and Wildfire Emergency Traffic Study - East San Jose / Alum Rock Foothills Development Area.
2. Letter from Jason Malatesta, received August 8, 2026, regarding: Where's the new stage?
3. Letter from Eric Parker, received August 8, 2026, regarding: Championing The Plaza Conservancy'sPlan for Plaza Park.
4. Letter from Wedge Martin, received August 9, 2026, regarding: Your Support Can Transform Plaza de Cesar Chavez: Act Today.
5. Letter from Wedge Martin, received August 9, 2026, regarding: Advocating for The Plaza Conservancy's Plaza Enhancements.
6. Letter from Wedge Martin, received August 9, 2026, regarding: Support for Local Events such as Jazz Summer Fest.
7. Letter from Joel Nelson, received August 9, 2026, regarding: Championing The Plaza Conservancy's Plan for Plaza Park.
8. Letter from Sam Waldner, received August 9, 2026, regarding: Endorsing The Plaza Conservancy's Vision for Plaza Enhancements.
Rules and Open Government Committee
August 19, 2026
Subject: Public Record
9. Letter from Martin Correa, received August 9, 2026, regarding: Advocating for Plaza Conservancy's Vision at Plaza de San Jos%3%9.
10. Letter from Symone Price, received August 9, 2026, regarding: Promoting the Plaza Conservancy's Upgrades for Plaza Park.
11. Letter from Filip Buca, received August 9, 2026, regarding: My Support for The Plaza Conservancy's Plaza Improvements.
12. Letter from California Energy Commission (CEC), received August 10, 2026, regarding: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report for the NorthTown Backup Generating Facility (25-SPPE-02).
13. Letter from Jordan Moldow, received August 10, 2026, regarding: Keep SJC Ewert Road open For cyclists – Open Letter.
____________________________
Toni J. Taber, MMC
City Clerk
TJT/tt
8/10/26, 10:12 AM lnbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook Outlook
Fw: Formal Request for Simultaneous Evacuation Capacity Analysis and Wildfire Emergency Traffic Study - East San Jose/ Alum Rock Foothills Development Area From Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Date Fri 8/7/2026 8:32 AM
To Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2026 7:27 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Formal Request for Simultaneous Evacuation Capacity Analysis and Wildfire Emergency Traffic Study - East San Jose/ Alum Rock Foothills Development Area
From: Randi
Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2026 8:43 PM
To: ZoningQuestions <[email protected]>; Keyon, David <[email protected]>; pwgeneralinfo <[email protected]>; PlanningSupportStaff <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; CouncilMeeting <[email protected]>; SJFDPermitSpecialist <[email protected]>; [email protected]; ; Ortiz, Peter <[email protected]>; Districts <[email protected]>; Districts <[email protected]>; Candelas, Domingo <[email protected]> Subject: Formal Request for Simultaneous Evacuation Capacity Analysis and Wildfire Emergency Traffic StudyEast San Jose/ Alum Rock Foothills Development Area [External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn morel You don't often get email from
To Whom It May Concern:
Learn whY. this is im12ortant
As residents and stakeholders in the East San Jose foothill communities, we formally request that the City of San Jose, the Department of Transportation, and the San Jose Fire Department conduct a comprehensive Simultaneous Evacuation Capacity Analysis prior to approval of additional large-scale residential development projects within the East Hills and AJum Rock planning areas.
Current and proposed projects collectively represent approximately 2,000 additional residential units that would substantially increase traffic loads onto already constrained evacuation corridors, including but not limited to:
• Clayton Road
• Mount Hamilton Road
• White Road
• Capitol Expressway
https://outlook_cloud.microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1 hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5M... 1/2 Public Record: 1
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. • Alum Rock Avenue • Associated foothill
collector streets and intersections including Quimby and Aborn Rds Existing traffic studies appear to evaluate routine peak-hour commuting conditions only. However, standard traffic modeling does not adequately analyze compounded emergency evacuation scenarios involving simultaneous wildfire evacuation and valley-floor congestion.
We specifically request a worst-case emergency evacuation simulation that evaluates:
1. A fast-moving wildfire event in the East Hills or foothill interface area;
2. Simultaneous downhill evacuation demand from hillside residents;
3. Concurrent evacuation attempts from newly constructed valley-floor residential developments;
4. Roadway impairment scenarios involving stalled vehicles, intersection failures, smoke-reduced visibility, or emergency responder access conflicts;
5. Emergency egress times for vulnerable populations, including seniors, disabled residents, school zones, and multifamily housing occupants;
6. Fire apparatus ingress capability during resident evacuation flows.
The increasing wildfire risks facing California communities make this analysis both foreseeable and necessary. The current roadway network contains multiple choke points and limited alternative evacuation routes. Without a comprehensive evacuation capacity analysis, approval of substantial additional density may expose residents to unacceptable life-safety risks during emergency conditions.
We further request that any environmental review conducted under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) include cumulative emergency evacuation impacts and wildfire-related circulation analysis prior to project approvals.
This request is not opposition to housing in principle. Rather, it is a request that public safety infrastructure and evacuation capacity be responsibly analyzed before irreversible approvals are granted.
We respectfully request:
• A formal response from the City regarding whether such evacuation modeling has been performed; • Public release of any prior evacuation studies affecting the area; • Consideration of an independent evacuation simulation if one has not yet been completed; • Inclusion of these issues in all upcoming Planning Commission and City Council hearings related to East Hills and Alum Rock development proposals.
Thank you for your attention to this important public safety matter.
Sincerely,
Tina Morgado
Alum Rock City Resident
Randi Maureen McMasters
Alum Rock / East Foothills Resident
8/10/26, 10:12 AM Inbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.cloud.microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5M… 2/2 8/10/26, 10:52 AM lnbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook Outlook
Fw: Where's the new stage?
From Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Date Mon 8/10/2026 9:39 AM
To Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2026 7:32 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Where's the new stage?
From: Girl Dad
Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2026 10:16 AM
To: District 10 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; Cicirelli, Jon <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District! <[email protected]>; Taber, Toni <[email protected]>; District2 <[email protected]>; Mahan, Matt <[email protected]>; Districts <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]> Cc: Yotam, Avi <[email protected]>; Lomio, M ichael <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Where's the new stage?
[External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn morel You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Dear Mayor Mahan and Members of the City Council,
I attended the San Jose Jazz Summer Fest this weekend and am writing to express my support for enhancements to Plaza Park (Plaza de San Jose).
Last year the city council approved funds to rebuild the stage. It also voted to move forward with a conservancy. Despite the council approval and funding, nothing happened.
I fully support the Plaza Conservancy's vision for a better stage and bandshell, improved sound systems, and necessary amenities such as permanent bathrooms. These upgrades will not only benefit cultural events but also make the Plaza more financially sustainable, save the city money, and create a more pleasant gathering spot.
By improving this space, we can create a more inviting and comfortable environment for everyone. These enhancements could significantly boost community spirit and pride, making it a notable destination.
https://outlook.cloud microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhh Yzk3NTk1 L TBmZDAtNDc4 Yi 1 hN2Q0L TZjNmZjNTk5M... 1 /2 Public Record: 2
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
I urge you to prioritize these improvements for the Plaza and proceed with the plans that have been before the city council for the past three years.
Please expedite the City's plan to empower a conservancy and support The Plaza Conservancy's improvement program.
Thank you for your support for better community spaces.
Jason Malatesta
San Jose
8/10/26, 10:52 AM Inbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.cloud.microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5M… 2/2 8/10/26, 10 51 AM lnbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook Outlook
Fw: Championing The Plaza Conservancy's Plan for Plaza Park From Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Date Mon 8/10/2026 9:39 AM
To Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2026 7:33 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Championing The Plaza Conservancy's Plan for Plaza Park -----Original Messaqe-----
From: Eric Parker
Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2026 6:50 PM
To: District9 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; Cicirelli, Jon <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; District? < [email protected]>; District4 < [email protected]>; District3 < [email protected]>; Districts < [email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; Taber, Toni <[email protected]>; Mahan, Matt < [email protected]>; District2 < [email protected]> Cc: Lomio, Michael <[email protected]>; Yotam, Avi <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Championing The Plaza Conservancy's Plan for Plaza Park [External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more< httP-s://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification >] [You don't often get email from
httP-s://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ]
Dear Mayor Mahan and Members of the City Council,
Learn why this is important at
I attended the San Jose Jazz Summer Fest this weekend and am writing to express my support for enhancements to Plaza Park (Plaza de San Jose).
I fully support the Plaza Conservancy's vision for a better stage and bandshell, improved sound systems, and necessary amenities such as permanent bathrooms. These upgrades will not only benefit cultural https://outlook.cloud microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhh Yzk3NTk1 L TBmZDAtNDc4 Yi 1 hN2Q0L TZjNmZjNTk5M... 1 /2 Public Record: 3
events but also make the Plaza more financially sustainable, save the city money, and create a more pleasant gathering spot.
By improving this space, we can create a more inviting and comfortable environment for everyone. These enhancements could significantly boost community spirit and pride, making it a notable destination.
I urge you to prioritize these improvements for the Plaza and proceed with the plans that have been before the city council for the past three years.
Please expedite the City's plan to empower a conservancy and support The Plaza Conservancy's improvement program.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Sent from my iphone Eric parker
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
8/10/26, 10:51 AM Inbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.cloud.microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5M… 2/2 8/10/26, 1049 AM lnbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook Outlook
Fw: Your Support Can Transform Plaza de Cesar Chavez: Act Today From Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Date Mon 8/10/2026 9:38 AM
To Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2026 7:36 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Your Support Can Transform Plaza de Cesar Chavez: Act Today -----Original Message-----
From: Wedge Martin
Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2026 5:26 AM
To: District 6 <[email protected]>; Mahan, Matt <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District4 < [email protected]>; District2 < [email protected]>; District 10 < District1 [email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; Cicirelli, Jon <[email protected]>; District? < [email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; Districts < [email protected]>; Taber, Toni <[email protected]>
Cc: City Clerk <[email protected]>; Yotam, Avi <[email protected]>; Lomio, Michael < [email protected]>
Subject: Your Support Can Transform Plaza de Cesar Chavez: Act Today [External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more< https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification >]
[You don't often get email fro
https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ]
Dear Mayor Mahan and Members of the City Council,
Learn why this is important at
I had the pleasure of attending the Plaza de Chess at Plaza de Cesar Chavez this past weekend, and I feel compelled to urge the city to facilitate more events like this.
I strongly encourage you to back The Plaza Conservancy's initiatives aimed at enhancing and activating https://outlook.cloud microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhh Yzk3NTk1 L TBmZDAtNDc4 Yi 1 hN2Q0L TZjNmZjNTk5M... 1 /2 Public Record: 4
the park.
Their vision includes a permanent stage, high-quality sound systems, proper restrooms, shaded seating, and small-scale concessions—these improvements are not just practical; they are essential.
Cities across the nation have successfully implemented similar upgrades in their conservancy-led parks, and it is high time that San José follows suit.
Please lend your support to The Plaza Conservancy and help pave the way for more vibrant events like Plaza de Chess in our community.
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
8/10/26, 10:49 AM Inbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.cloud.microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5M… 2/2 8/10/26, 10 50 AM lnbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook Outlook
Fw: Advocating for The Plaza Conservancy's Plaza Enhancements From Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Date Mon 8/10/2026 9:38 AM
To Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2026 7:35 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Advocating for The Plaza Conservancy's Plaza Enhancements -----Original Message-----
From: Wedge Martin
Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2026 5:26 AM
To: District4 <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; Cicirelli, Jon <[email protected]>; Taber, Toni <[email protected]>; District2 < [email protected]>; District? < [email protected]>; District 10 < District1 [email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; Mahan, Matt < [email protected]>; Districts < [email protected]> Cc: Lomio, Michael <[email protected]>; Yotam, Avi <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Advocating for The Plaza Conservancy's Plaza Enhancements [External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more< httP-s://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification >] [You don't often get email fro
httP-s://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ]
Dear Mayor Mahan and Members of the City Council,
Learn why this is important at
I attended the San Jose Jazz Summer Fest this weekend and am writing to advocate for enhancements to Plaza Park (Plaza de San Jose).
https://outlook.cloud microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhh Yzk3NTk1 L TBmZDAtNDc4 Yi 1 hN2Q0L TZjNmZjNTk5M... 1 /2 Public Record: 5
I fully support the Plaza Conservancy's vision for a better stage and bandshell, improved sound systems, and necessary amenities such as permanent bathrooms. These upgrades will not only benefit cultural events but also make the Plaza more financially viable, save the city money, and create a more enjoyable place to gather.
By improving this space, we can create a more inviting and comfortable environment for everyone. These enhancements could significantly elevate community spirit and pride, making it a notable destination.
I urge you to prioritize these improvements for the Plaza and move forward with the plans that have been before the city council for the past three years.
Please expedite the City's plan to empower a conservancy and support The Plaza Conservancy's improvement program.
Thank you for considering this important initiative.
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
8/10/26, 10:50 AM Inbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.cloud.microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5M… 2/2 8/10/26, 10:47 AM lnbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook Outlook
Fw: Support for Local Events such as Jazz Summer Fest
From Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Date Mon 8/10/2026 9:38 AM
To Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2026 7:36 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Support for Local Events such as Jazz Summer Fest -----Original Message-----
From: Wedge Martin
Sent Sunday, August 9, 2026 5:32 AM
To: District9 <[email protected]>; District4 < [email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; Taber, Toni <[email protected]>; Cicirelli, Jon <Jon.Cicirel [email protected]>; District3 < [email protected]>; District 10 < [email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District2 < [email protected]>; Districts < [email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District7 < [email protected]>; Mahan, Matt < Matt. [email protected]> Cc: Lomio, Michael <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Maguire, Jennifer <[email protected]>; Yotam, Avi <[email protected]>; City Clerk < [email protected]>
Subject: Support for Local Events such as Jazz Summer Fest [External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more< httr.s:J/a ka. ms/Lea rnAboutSend erl dentifi cation >] [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at httr.s://a ka. ms/Lea rnAboutSend erl dentifi cation ]
Dear Mayor Mahan and Esteemed Members of the City Council, I hope this message finds you well.
htlps://outlook.cloud . microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/ AAQkADhh Yzk3NTk1 L TBmZDAINDc4 Yi1 hN2Q0L TZjNmZjNTk5M.. 1 /2 Public Record: 6
As someone who attended the San Jose Jazz Summer Fest this past weekend, I felt compelled to share my thoughts regarding the necessary improvements to Plaza de Cesar Chavez.
The Plaza is in dire need of proper restrooms, an upgraded stage, and adequate facilities for the worldclass artists who grace our city with their talent.
Events like the jazz festival not only bring joy but also attract visitors, generate revenue, and enrich our cultural landscape.
I kindly ask that you support the park and its dedicated organizers by providing the essential amenities they require.
It is crucial to acknowledge the efforts of The Plaza Conservancy and to approve their communityfocused initiatives aimed at enhancing Plaza de Chavez.
Thank you for considering this important matter.
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
8/10/26, 10:47 AM Inbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.cloud.microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5M… 2/2 8/10/26, 10:47 AM lnbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook Outlook
Fw: Championing The Plaza Conservancy's Plan for Plaza Park From Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Date Mon 8/10/2026 9:38 AM
To Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2026 7:39 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Championing The Plaza Conservancy's Plan for Plaza Park -----Oriqinal Messaqe-----
From
Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2026 2:56 PM
To: Cicirelli, Jon <[email protected]>; Mahan, Matt <[email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]>; District4 < [email protected]>; District 10 < [email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; District2 < [email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; Taber, Toni <[email protected]>; District? < [email protected]>; Districts < [email protected]> Cc: City Clerk <[email protected]>; Lamia, Michael <[email protected]>; Yotam, Avi <[email protected]>
Subject: Championing The Plaza Conservancy's Plan for Plaza Park [External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more< https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification >]
[Some people who received this message don't often get email from this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] Dear Mayor Mahan and Members of the City Council,
Learn why
I attended the San Jose Jazz Summer Fest this weekend and am writing to express my support for enhancements to Plaza Park (Plaza de San Jose).
https://outlook.cloud microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhh Yzk3NTk1 L TBmZDAtNDc4 Yi 1 hN2Q0L TZjNmZjNTk5M... 1 /2 Public Record: 7
8/10/26, 10:47 AM In box - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook I fully support the Plaza Conservancy's vision for a better stage and bandshell, improved sound systems, and necessary amenities such as permanent bathrooms. These upgrades will not only benefit cultural events but also make the Plaza more financially sustainable, save the city money, and create a more pleasant gathering spot.
By improving this space, we can create a more inviting and comfortable environment for everyone. These enhancements could significantly boost community spirit and pride, making it a notable destination.
I urge you to prioritize these improvements for the Plaza and proceed with the plans that have been before the city counci l for the past three years.
Please expedite the City's plan to empower a conservancy and support The Plaza Conservancy's improvement program.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Joel Nelson
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
https:!/outlook.cloud microsofl/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhh Yzk3NTk1 L TBmZDAtNDc4 Yi1 hN2Q0L TZjNmZjNTk5M... 2/2 8/10/26, 1046 AM lnbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook Outlook
Fw: Endorsing The Plaza Conservancy's Vision for Plaza Enhancements From Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Date Mon 8/10/2026 9:37 AM
To Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2026 7:39 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Endorsing The Plaza Conservancy's Vision for Plaza Enhancements -----Oriqinal Messaqe-----
From:
Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2026 3:27 PM
To: Cicirelli, Jon <[email protected]>; Mahan, Matt <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; Taber, Toni <[email protected]>; District? < [email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; District4 < [email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District2 < [email protected]>; District 10 < District1 [email protected]>; Districts < [email protected]>; District1 <[email protected]> Cc: Yotam, Avi <[email protected]>; Lomio, Michael <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Endorsing The Plaza Conservancy's Vision for Plaza Enhancements [External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more< httP-s://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification >] [You don't often get email from
httP-s://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ]
Dear Mayor Mahan and Members of the City Council,
Learn why this is important at
I attended the San Jose Jazz Summer Fest this weekend and am writing to support enhancements to Plaza Park (Plaza de San Jose).
https://outlook.cloud microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhh Yzk3NTk1 L TBmZDAtNDc4 Yi 1 hN2Q0L TZjNmZjNTk5M... 1 /2 Public Record: 8
I fully endorse the Plaza Conservancy's vision for a better stage and bandshell, improved sound systems, and necessary amenities such as permanent bathrooms. These upgrades will not only benefit cultural events but also make the Plaza more financially sustainable, save the city money, and create a more pleasant gathering spot.
By improving this space, we can create a more inviting and comfortable environment for everyone. These enhancements could significantly boost community spirit and pride, making it a notable destination.
I urge you to prioritize these improvements for the Plaza and proceed with the plans that have been before the city council for the past three years.
Please expedite the City's plan to empower a conservancy and support The Plaza Conservancy's improvement program.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Sam Waldner
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
8/10/26, 10:46 AM Inbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.cloud.microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5M… 2/2 8/10/26, 1046 AM lnbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook Outlook
Fw: Advocating for Plaza Conservancy's Vision at Plaza de San Jos%3%9 From Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Date Mon 8/10/2026 9:37 AM
To Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2026 7:39 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Advocating for Plaza Conservancy's Vision at Plaza de San Jos%3%9 From: Martin Corre
Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2026 3:30 PM
To: District8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; Taber, Toni <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; Mahan, Matt <[email protected]>; District! <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; Districts <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; Cicirelli, Jon <[email protected]>; District? <[email protected]>; District2 <[email protected]> Cc: City Clerk <[email protected]>; Lomio, Michael <[email protected]>; Yotam, Avi <[email protected]>
Subject: Advocating for Plaza Conservancy's Vision at Plaza de San Jos%3%9 [External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn morel You don't often get email from Learn why this is imP.ortant Dear Mayor Mahan and Members of the City Council, I attended the San Jose Jazz Summer Fest this weekend and am writing to express my suppo1t for enhancements to Plaza Park (Plaza de San Jos%3%9).
I fully suppo1t the Plaza Conse1vancy's vision for a better stage and bandshell, improved sound systems, and necessa1y amenities such as pennanent bathrooms. These upgrades will not only benefit cultural events but also make the Plaza more financially sustainable,
save the city money, and create a more pleasant gathering spot. By improving this space, we can create a more inviting and comfo1table environment for eve1yone. These enhancements could significantly boost community spirit and pride, making it a notable destination.
I urge you to prioritize these improvements for the Plaza and proceed with the plans that have been before the city council for the past three years. Please expedite the City's plan to empower a conse1vancy and suppo1t The Plaza Conservancy's improvement program.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conguer
https://outlook.cloud microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhh Yzk3NTk1 L TBmZDAtNDc4 Yi 1 hN2Q0L TZjNmZjNTk5M... 1 /2 Public Record: 9
8/10/26, 10:45 AM lnbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook Outlook
Fw: Promoting the Plaza Conservancy's Upgrades for Plaza Park From Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Date Mon 8/10/2026 9:36 AM
To Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2026 7:40 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Promoting the Plaza Conservancy's Upgrades for Plaza Park From: symone price
Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2026 4:34 PM
To: District7 <[email protected]>; Cicirelli, Jon <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; Districtl <[email protected]>; Districts <[email protected]>; District 6 <d istrict6@sa njoseca. gov>; D istrict2 < District2@sa njoseca .gov>; Dist ri ct3 <d istrict3@sa njoseca .gov>; Distri ct8 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; Mahan, Matt <[email protected]>; District4 <[email protected]>; Taber, Toni <[email protected]> Cc: Yotam, Avi <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Lomio, Michael <[email protected]>
Subject: Promoting the Plaza Conservancy's Upgrades for Plaza Park [External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn more) You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important Dear Mayor Mahan and Members of the City Council,
I attended the San Jose Jazz Summer Fest this weekend and am writing to express my support for enhancements to Plaza Park (Plaza de San Jose).
I fully support the Plaza Conservancy's vision for a better stage and bandshell, improved sound systems, and necessary amenities such as permanent bathrooms. These upgrades will not only benefit cultural events but also make the Plaza more financially sustainable, save the city money, and create a more pleasant gathering spot.
By improving this space, we can create a more inviting and comfortable environment for everyone. These enhancements could significantly boost community spirit and pride, making it a notable destination.
I urge you to prioritize these improvements for the Plaza and proceed with the plans that have https://outlook.cloud.microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1 hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5M.. . 1/2 Public Record: 10
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. been before the city council for the past three years.
Please expedite the City's plan to empower a conservancy and support The Plaza Conservancy's improvement program.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
8/10/26, 10:45 AM Inbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.cloud.microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5M… 2/2 8/10/26, 10:44 AM lnbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook Outlook
Fw: My Support for The Plaza Conservancy's Plaza Improvements From Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Date Mon 8/10/2026 9:36 AM
To Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas <[email protected]> From: City Clerk <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2026 7:40 AM
To: Agendadesk <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: My Support for The Plaza Conservancy's Plaza Improvements From: Filip Buca
Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2026 5:23 PM
To: District4 <[email protected]>; Cicirelli, Jon <[email protected]>; District2 <[email protected]>; District9 <[email protected]>; Taber, Toni <[email protected]>; District 6 <[email protected]>; Mahan, Matt <[email protected]>; District 10 <[email protected]>; District3 <[email protected]>; Districts <[email protected]>; District! <[email protected]>; District8 <[email protected]>; District7 <[email protected]> Cc: Yotam, Avi <[email protected]>; City Clerk <[email protected]>; Lomio, Michael <M [email protected]>
Subject: My Support for The Plaza Conservancy's Plaza Improvements [External Email. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources. Learn morel You don't often get email from Learn why this is imP.ortant Dear Mayor Mahan and City Council Members,
As a participant in this weekend's San Jose Jazz Summer Fest, I am reaching out to support the proposed enhancements to Plaza Park (Plaza de San Jose).
I wholeheartedly back the Plaza Conservancy's vision for a better stage and bandshell, improved sound systems, and necessary amenities such as permanent bathrooms. These upgrades will not only benefit cultural events but also make the Plaza more financially viable, save the city money, and create a more enjoyable place to gather.
Improving this space can create a more inviting and comfortable environment for everyone.
These enhancements could significantly elevate community spirit and pride, making it a notable destination.
I urge you to prioritize these improvements for the Plaza and move forward with the plans that have been before the city council for the past three years. https://outlook.cloud microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhh Yzk3NTk1 L TBmZDAtNDc4 Yi 1 hN2Q0L TZjNmZjNTk5M... 1 /2 Public Record: 11
This message is from outside the City email system. Do not open links or attachments from untrusted sources.
Please expedite the City's plan to empower a conservancy and support The Plaza Conservancy's improvement program.
Thank you for considering this important initiative.
Cheers,
Filip Buca
8/10/26, 10:44 AM Inbox - Rules and Open Government Committee Agendas - Outlook https://outlook.cloud.microsoft/mail/[email protected]/inbox/id/AAQkADhhYzk3NTk1LTBmZDAtNDc4Yi1hN2Q0LTZjNmZjNTk5M… 2/2
CALIFORNIA
) NATURAL
<< RESOURCES
AGENCY
California =
ENERGY COMMISSION
Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental
Impact Report for the NorthTown Backup Generating
Facility (25-SPPE-02)
Date: July 21, 2026
To: Reviewing Agencies and other Interested Parties
From: California Energy Commission (CEC)
Project Title: NorthTown Backup Generating Facility (NTBGF) Project Applicant: GIC San Jose LLC
Docket Log: 25-SPPE-02
NOP Review Period: July 21, 2026, to August 20, 2026
In accordance with California Code of Regulations, title 14, section 15082, the California Energy Commission (CEC) staff has prepared a Notice of Preparation (NOP) to inform the Governor's Office of Land use and Climate Innovation (LCI) and each responsible and trustee agency that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be prepared for the NorthTown Backup Generating Facility (NTBGF) proposed by GIC San Jose LLC (applicant) in the city of San José, California.
The NTBGF is planned as part of the NorthTown Park Data Center (NTDC), and together constitute the <project= under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project would consist of a total of forty-two (42) diesel generators and two data center buildings designated as DC North and DC West. The diesel generators would be used exclusively to provide up to 97.3 megawatts (MW) of backup emergency generation to support the NTDC, with uninterrupted power during a utility outage.
Small Power Plant Exemption Process
The CEC has exclusive authority to certify all thermal power plants 50 megawatts (MW) and greater including related facilities proposed for construction in - California. The Small Power Plant Exemption (SPPE) process allows applicants that are proposing to construct thermal power plants between 50 MW and 100 energy.ca.gov
715 P Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Public Record: 12
MW to obtain an exemption from the CEC9s jurisdiction and proceed with local permitting rather than requiring CEC certification. Per Public Resources Code, section 25541, the CEC can grant an exemption not exceeding 100 MW if it finds that the proposed facility would not create a substantial adverse impact on the environment or energy resources. Public Resources Section 25541 (c) designates the CEC as the CEQA lead agency for all facilities seeking an exemption through the SPPE process. The CEC will not approve the construction of the project, only determining whether the project can be exempted from the CEC9s jurisdiction.
The CEC staff has begun its review of the application and will prepare an EIR for public review. At the conclusion of the evaluation and the opportunity for public review and comment regarding the project, a decision will be made by the CEC at a noticed public business meeting on whether the application meets the requirements of Public Resources Code, section 25541. Should the exemption be granted, the applicant would still need to secure the appropriate entitlements and permits from the relevant local, regional, state, and federal agencies to construct and operate the proposed project. The CEC9s regulations setting forth the SPPE process are primarily located in Title 20, California Code of Regulations, sections 1936 and 1940-1942.
Response to the Notice of Preparation
Pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs, tit. 14, § 15082(b)), each responsible and trustee agency and LCI shall provide detail about the scope and content of the environmental information related to the responsible and trustee agency's area of statutory responsibility that must be included in the draft EIR.
At a minimum, the response shall identify:
e The significant environmental issues and reasonable alternatives and mitigation measures that the responsible or trustee agency, or LCI will need to have explored in all draft EIR; and,
e Whether the agency will be a responsible agency or trustee agency for the project.
Due to the time limits mandated by State law, responses must be sent at the earliest possible date but not later than 30 days after receipt of this notice. CEC staff requests your comments by Thursday, August 20, 2026. Based on comments received by public agencies on the scope and content of the EIR, CEC staff may request additional information from the applicant to address such comments. If a responsible or trustee agency or LCI does not respond by the end of the 30-day period to provide the CEC with either a response to the NOP determine whether they are sufficient to reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant and, if necessary, propose additional mitigation measures.
Land Use
Analysis will discuss whether the project would divide an established community, or whether the project would cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Specifically, analysis of the project will focus on the project's consistency with the policies and regulations of the City of San José9s General Plan and Zoning Code, including allowed land uses, maximum height, and minimum setbacks. The project is within approximately 1,700 feet of the San José Mineta International Airport, so the analysis will also discuss the project9s height relative to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations and local Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan policies. At this time, no potentially significant land use impacts have been identified.
Noise
The noise levels associated with construction could be potentially significant but could be mitigated via the implementation of a construction noise plan. The temporary intermittent noise impacts associated with the yearly testing of the gensets, as well as the likelihood for increased noise levels resulting from project operation could be potentially significant. The nearest residential area is located approximately 3,200 feet northwest of the project site and is not anticipated to be significantly impacted by project noise levels. If potentially significant impacts on sensitive receptors are identified, CEC staff would draft mitigation, including noise attenuation and other measures to reduce impacts to less than significant.
Transportation
The EIR will discuss the project's potentially significant impacts from vehiclemiles-traveled (VMT). The project generated VMT per employee (17.88) is greater than the city of San José9s threshold of 16.53 VMT per employee for industrial uses. The potentially significant VMT impacts may be reduced with compliance and application of existing regulatory requirements and applicant proposed mitigation measure. Mitigation measures proposed by the applicant include implementing educational campaigns for all employees to encourage the use of transit, carpooling, and active transportation modes and providing ridesharing program for future employees. The project could have a potentially Significant impact from permanent project structures and thermal plumes generated by the project9s roof-top chillers and emergency generators affecting nearby aviation operations at the San José Mineta International Airport. The project site is located within the airport9s <Airport Influence Area= and is in an area with Federal Aviation Regulations, Part 77 maximum structure height of 212 feet above mean sea level. The applicant is preparing a thermal plume analysis and will provide staff with the report when it has been completed. Lastly, the project applicant must prepare and submit FAA, Form 7460-1 for project structures exceeding the 100:1 imaginary surface of approximately 17 feet. The FAA will conduct an aeronautical study and issue a Determination of No Hazard, Determination of No Hazard with Conditions, or a Determination of Hazard. Staff9s analysis of the project9s permanent structures and thermal plume impacts will heavily rely on this forthcoming information. CEC staff will evaluate possible :
mitigation options if the project has a significant impact to aviation from permanent structures and thermal plumes.
Wildfire
The project site is within the City of San José in Santa Clara County in an urban environment, not in the vicinity of wildlands. The City of San José is not located in or near a State Responsibility Area but is located within an un-zoned Local Responsibility Area as designated by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. The project is not near a moderate, high, or very high Fire Hazard Severity Zone, or land classified as having a fire threat by the California Public Utilities Commission.
Staff will assess the potential impacts related to wildfire risk and, if necessary, propose mitigation measures to reduce the risk, such as engineering and administrative controls, enhanced emergency response, and vegetation management. Based on its analysis to date, staff identified that the project would likely have no impact related to wildfire.
Alternatives
The EIR will consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives to the project. In addition to a no project alternative, the EIR will likely consider fuel cell technology, battery storage, and natural gas internal combustion engines.
Environmental Justice
CEC staff has determined the presence of an environmental justice population within the vicinity of the project site using currently available 2020 Census and California Department of Education data. Staff will analyze whether the project would result in any disproportionate impacts to the environmental justice population.
10 Responsible Agencies
CEC staff has identified the Bay Area Air Quality Management District and the City of San José as responsible agencies for this project. The project will require the following approvals and permits if exempted:
e Bay Area Air Quality Management District 4 authority to construct and permit to operate.
e City of San José 4 Project Clearance Committee review and approval, and Master Plan approval.
Trustee Agencies
CEC staff has identified the California Department of Fish and Wildlife as a trustee agency for this project.
Attachments (from SPPE main application TN: 264500):
Regional Map (Figure 2-1)
Project Vicinity Map (Figure 2-2).
4 |
A ee. en
Project Site 1880) ene 6 9
w04e > )
Palo Alto
0) Adsau3 er
Wealosg 193Ud) e1eG UMOLYLON
uorssiwu
Los Gatos
6 aun
uouesiddy vondwax3 iueig Jamo jews
$720z
REGIONAL MAP FIGURE 2-1
Figure 2-1 Regional Location Map
11 uoissiwwo0) Adau3 ermojyeD
* paloig saquay e1eg UMOLYLON
$z0z aunt
uoyeriddy uoudwax3 juejd JaMog jews,
_| $223 Project site
SS ig
~ CentrCaal l pa "
Eptessway
sees
a
\
VICINITY MAP FIGURE 2-2
Figure 2-2 Project Vicinity Map
12 or a well-justified request for additional time, CEC staff will presume that none of those entities have a response to make.
Project Webpage, Subscription and Document Availability The CEC maintains a website for this project
https://www.energy.ca.gov/powerplant/backup-generating-system/northtownbackup-generating-facility. The SPPE application and related project documents are viewable by clicking on the 8Docket Log (25-SPPE-02) found on top right yellow box of the project webpage
https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/Lists/DocketLog.aspx?docketnumber=25-SPPE-02.
To submit comments electronically, use the CEC9s electronic commenting feature on the NTBGF webpage (linked above), click on the 8Submit eComment9 link found in yellow box on right-side, and follow the instructions in the online form.
In your comments, be sure to include the project name. Once filed, a comments receipt email with a link to the comments will be sent and your comments will be part of the proceeding9s public record.
Interested agencies or members of the public may also subscribe via the project webpage to receive electronic notices of all the project-related activities and documents related to the CEC9s exemption evaluation, click on the 8Subscribe NorthTown Backup Generating Facility9 found in the lower right yellow box of the project webpage (linked above).
If you have any questions or need additional information on how to participate in CEC9s review of the proposed project, please contact Elizabeth Huber, Project Manager, by email to Elizabeth. [email protected].
Project Location and Description
The project site is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of West Trimble Road and Orchard Parkway in San José, California. The data center buildings, emergency backup generating facilities, project substation, water storage and treatment area, the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) switching station, site circulation, and parking would be located on Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 101-02-018 and 101-02-021. The entire project site is approximately 28.5 acres.
The project site is bound to the north by West Trimble Road, to the south by an undeveloped property planned for future development as an unrelated data center facility, to the east by Orchard Parkway, and to the west by the Guadalupe Trail and Guadalupe River. As the project is primarily a redevelopment of an existing, operating industrial site, the portions of the existing industrial facilities to remain are not included in the definition of the project site. Given this, the project site is irregularly shaped and only includes the general development areas for DC North and DC West and their associated functions, the project substation, the PG&E switching station and limited modifications to existing site circulation and parking affected by the project site9s redevelopment.
The proposed project site has two General Plan land use designations of Combined Industrial/Commercial (CIC) and Industrial Park (IP). The project site is in two zoning districts, the CIC zoning district and IP Planned Development (PD) zoning district. DC North would be within the IP PD zoning district while DC West, the project substation, and the PG&E switching station would be within the CIC zoning district. Much of the project site is currently developed with circulation and landscaped areas that surround an existing industrial facility. A portion of the project site associated with DC North was cleared and graded in 2022 in preparation for a previous advanced manufacturing project that did not move forward.
The project9s backup generating facility would include Tier 4 compliant diesel generators to provide up to 97.3 MW to the data center in the event of a loss of electric service from PG&E. Specifically proposed are forty (40) 3-MW primary emergency generators and two (2) 1.75-MW administrative emergency generators. The sole purpose of the backup generating facilities is to provide electrical power to support the data center campus operations in the event of loss of electrical service from the local electric utility provider, PG&E.
The project would include two alternative options for construction and operation of a PG&E transmission line and switching station to serve the data center. The project would also require work within the existing public right-of-way, including off-site utility installations and possible intersection improvements needed to support the project. The project would also modify both the southwest and southeast corners of the Trimble Road and Orchard Parkway intersection, removing the existing pedestrian refuge (pork-chop) islands at the southwest and southeast corners. This removal would require a modification of the existing traffic signal to relocate the existing poles from the pedestrian refuge islands.
A regional map and project vicinity map figure from the application are attached to this notice.
Probable Environmental Effects
The CEC9s EIR will analyze the reasonably foreseeable direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of the proposed project in the topic areas specified in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines.
Based on a preliminary review of the application and other filed information, CEC staff anticipates that the following topic areas will be analyzed further in the EIR:
Air Quality ;
The proposed project would be in the San Franciso Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB) under the jurisdiction of the Bay Area Air District (BAAD). The SFBAAB is designated as non-attainment for ozone and particular matter (PM) federal and state ambient air quality standards. The diesel-powered backup generators proposed for the project could result in potentially significant impacts due to emissions of ozone precursors (oxides of nitrogen [NOx] and reactive organic gases) and diesel particulate matter (DPM), a toxic air contaminant. Ozone precursor emissions would be offset through the permitting process with BAAD.
The EIR will discuss whether the project would result in potential cumulatively considerable net increase of a criteria pollutant(s) for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard.
The EIR will also discuss whether the project would: conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan; expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, including impacts from criteria pollutants and toxic air contaminants; or result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. If project impacts related to air quality and public health are determined to be significant, mitigation will be identified to reduce impacts to a less than significant level, as feasible.
Biological Resources
The EIR will evaluate the potential impacts to biological resources associated with project construction and operation. Biological resources that may be affected include special-status plant and wildlife species, river and riparian habitat, wildlife movement corridors, mature trees, and other sensitive biological communities. The analysis will consider potential direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts to these resources, including habitat loss or modification, disturbance from construction and operational activities, introduction or spread of invasive species, stormwater runoff and hazardous materials affecting sensitive biological communities, and nitrogen deposition resulting from project emissions that could affect sensitive habitats.
The project is located within the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Plan (SCVHP) permit area and is expected to be subject to applicable SCVHP requirements. The EIR will evaluate potential impacts to species and habitats covered under the SCVHP, as well as special-status species not covered under the Habitat Plan. Species that may be addressed in the EIR include Congdon9s tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii), Crotch9s bumble bee (Bombus crotchii), northwestern pond turtle (Actinemys marmorata), western burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), and whitetailed kite (E/anus /eucurus), among others.
The EIR will also evaluate potential impacts to the Guadalupe River and associated riparian habitats as well as fish and wildlife species that may occur within these areas. The analysis will consider potential impacts related to construction disturbance, lighting, noise, stormwater runoff, water quality, and wildlife movement. Potential impacts to ordinance-sized native and non-native trees will also be evaluated, including consistency with applicable local tree protection requirements.
The applicant has identified preliminary measures intended to avoid or minimize impacts, including, but not limited to, conducting preconstruction surveys for special-status plants and wildlife, establishment of species protection buffers, requiring worker environmental awareness training for all project personnel, conducting biological monitoring, adherence to applicable conditions in the SCVHP to protect sensitive resources, and payment of applicable SCVHP fees for impacts to burrowing owls and impacts from nitrogen deposition on sensitive habitats. Staff will evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of these measures and may identify additional measures through independent review and coordination with the Santa Clara Valley Habitat Agency, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Marine Fisheries Service.
Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
Based on preliminary information, the proposed project might impact cultural or tribal cultural resources. The literature review prepared by the applicant indicates that there is a moderate to high sensitivity for deeply buried pre-contact archaeological resources and that the project could affect unknown pre-contact cultural resources or human remains (TN264500, page 151). Based on a review of information provided in the literature review, CEC staff has requested additional data to assess the potential impacts on cultural and tribal cultural resources.
Ground disturbance proposed as part of the project could encounter and damage buried resources that meet CEQA8s criteria for historical, unique archaeological, or tribal cultural resources. The resulting impacts would likely be significant under CEQA. The applicant has proposed various mitigation measures to reduce the severity of any such impacts. At this time, there is not enough information to conclude whether the project would result in significant impacts to cultural or tribal cultural resources and whether they could be mitigated to a less-thansignificant level.
Geology and Soils (Paleontology)
CEC staff will evaluate potential impacts related to geology and soils, including paleontological resources. CEC staff is evaluating the project application, a 2019 geotechnical investigation that was conducted for a prior project at the proposed site, and a 2023 preliminary site-specific geotechnical investigation that was conducted on behalf of the applicant for the proposed project. CEC staff is evaluating regional geologic mapping and evaluations of geologic hazards, including hazard mapping, performed by the California Geological Survey and United States Geological Survey. CEC staff are evaluating online paleontological databases.
Based on the information reviewed thus far, CEC staff anticipates potential impacts related to surface fault rupture, strong seismic ground shaking, seismicinduced ground failure, soil erosion, unstable geologic units or soils, and paleontological resources that would require mitigation. The applicant proposed project design measures to mitigate these potential impacts to less than significant. At this time, CEC staff anticipates that mitigation would reduce potential impacts related to geology and soils to less than significant. Potential impacts related to geology and soils will be analyzed further in the EIR.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The project could result in potentially significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from three categories of activities: direct emissions from construction, direct emissions from the testing and maintenance of the backup diesel generators, and emissions from the data center's miscellaneous operations, both direct and indirect. CEC staff expects that the potentially significant temporary direct emissions from construction could be mitigated through the use of best management practices and that the potentially significant direct emissions from testing and maintenance would be below relevant significance thresholds through the use of renewable diesel, as feasible. Additionally, the potentially significant indirect GHG emissions associated with the data center's electricity use would be reduced with the project9s participation in the San José Clean Energy (SJCE) at the Total Green level (i.e., 100 free carbon-free electricity) or similar program that accomplishes the same goals as 100 percent carbon-free electricity.
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
The project site is in an urban environment consisting of a mix of industrial, commercial, warehousing, and business park properties. The project site is located within two miles of the San José Mineta International Airport and is located within the Airport Influence Area where it may be affected by noise, height limits, and aviation safety considerations. There are no schools within one-quarter mile of the project site.
Several environmental site assessments (ESA) and surveys have been performed at the project site since the late 1980s. Based on the Phase I ESA conducted for the project site in September 2024 (included in Appendix J of the project application), the site has a history of agricultural use until about 1974 and commercial/industrial uses beginning in 1978 to the present. The Phase I ESA identified several potential environmental conditions related to the site9s former agricultural use and the history of hazardous materials use and spills at adjacent industrial sites. The Phase II ESA conducted in 2014 indicated that some heavy metals (arsenic) were detected above regulatory screening levels but below levels for groundwater not used as a drinking water source.
The project would use hazardous materials during project construction and operation. Project construction activities could result in spills or leaks of hazardous materials, such as fuels for construction equipment and vehicles, and small amounts of lubricants and solvents. Construction workers could encounter unknown contaminated soil or groundwater. During operation, a large quantity of diesel fuel, totaling approximately 234,000 gallons, would be stored in integrated fuel storage tanks within each generator enclosure. Urea or diesel exhaust fluid, used as part of the diesel engine combustion process, and totaling approximately 4,200 gallons, would be stored in 100-gallon tanks within each generator enclosure. Spills or leaks of diesel fuel or diesel exhaust fluid could occur during refueling or due to damage to the tanks.
The project construction or operation could result in potentially significant environmental impacts due to encountering contaminated soil or groundwater during construction, spills from diesel fuel or diesel exhaust fluid during operation, or aviation safety or noise hazards. Staff will review the applicant proposed project design measures (PDM HAZ-1.1 and PDM HAZ-1.2) to Public Record: 13