Cities Index.
Memorandum - Conflicts of Interest

San Jose City Council
October 6, 2026

Document
Memorandum - Conflicts of Interest
Meeting
October 6, 2026
Body
San Jose City Council
Pages
3
Original file
154 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
September 23, 2026
Subject: Arts Commission Applicant – Conflict of Interest

Page 1 ends

T-24297.02/2306478
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND

CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Susana Alcala Wood
City Attorney
SUBJECT: Conflicts Review –
Arts Commission Applicant
DATE: September 23, 2026

BACKGROUND
This Office routinely reviews applications to City Boards and Commissions. The applications generally do not provide complete information regarding actual conflicts; however, they do occasionally disclose potential conflicts of interest or incompatible offices. The purpose of this memorandum is to highlight areas of potential conflict which are disclosed by the applications. In order to analyze potential conflicts, it is necessary to consider the duties of the particular commission for which the applicants are seeking appointment. This review is limited to the information provided on the applications and is not intended to be a comprehensive investigation of potential conflicts involving the applicants.

COMMISSION DUTIES
Pursuant to the San José Municipal Code, the Arts Commission advises the City Council and other City boards and commissions on matters relating to the arts and cultural life of the City, reviews and recommends funding levels for grant applications from cultural and other organizations and monitors the City’s art acquisition program.

The Commission is also responsible for formulating recommendations with respect to the City’s art in public places program, in conjunction with the appropriate City departments and commissions.

Persons appointed to the Commission must have “acknowledged accomplishment” in one or more fields of art or “they must have demonstrated a deep interest and appreciation of cultural and artistic activities.”

APPLICANTS
The applicant listed below was reviewed by our office. The application does not disclose incompatible offices or apparent conflicts of interest that would substantially impair the functioning of the Arts Commission.

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
September 23, 2026
Subject: Arts Commission Applicant – Conflict of Interest

Page 2 ends

T-24297.02/2306478

LEGAL CONFLICTS THAT MAY PRECLUDE VOTE OR PARTICIPATION Certain positions may preclude a commissioner from participating in a commission discussion or from voting if a matter involving a commissioner and an entity comes before the Commission in the situations mentioned below. While this list is not complete, these types of conflicts generally fall within one or more of the following situations:
• An application shows entities that are “sources of income” to a potential commissioner within the 12 months preceding the start of the commission term, as defined under the Political Reform Act.
• An application shows sources of income to a Spouse or Domestic Partner of a potential commissioner within the 12 months preceding the start of the commission term.
• An applicant or the Spouse or Domestic Partner of an applicant is an Officer or Board Member of an entity and it is foreseeable that the entity could be involved in a matter coming before the commission.

APPEARANCE OF BIAS
There may be facts which would not amount to a legal conflict of interest requiring a commissioner to recuse him or herself from a commission vote or discussion, but the relationship could create an appearance of bias on the part of the commissioner. City Council policy requires commissions to be free of bias in their decision making and may require a commissioner to recuse him or herself if the facts could reasonably lead one to conclude that the applicant would be biased for or against an entity or entities.

REVIEW OF APPLICANTS
Set forth below are any apparent legal conflicts of interest and/or appearance of bias related to entities that are likely to come before the Arts Commission in some manner, as identified on the application.

Suzanne St. John Crane – The applicant is the President of St. Crane Strategies in San José. The applicant is also the Board President of Fountain Blues Foundation and the Director of Strategy for Friends of Levitt Pavillion San Jose. The applicant’s spouse is an Engineer at Apple. It is possible that the Commission could consider a matter involving a source of income to or an organization affiliated with the applicant which may present an actual conflict or appearance of bias. In such a case, the applicant may need to disqualify themself from taking part in the Commission’s decision on that matter.

Otherwise, the application discloses no incompatible offices nor apparent conflicts of interest.

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
September 23, 2026
Subject: Arts Commission Applicant – Conflict of Interest

Page 3 ends

T-24297.02/2306478

CONCLUSION
The applicant does not appear to have any incompatible offices or pervasive conflicts which would prevent serving on the Commission. You may wish to consider the above comments in making your recommendation on appointment to the Commission.

SUSANA ALCALA WOOD
City Attorney
By: /s/ Annette E. Brennan
ANNETTE E. BRENNAN
Deputy City Attorney
cc: Jennifer Maguire, City Manager
Toni J. Taber, CMC, City Clerk

← All documents from this meeting