San Luis Obispo City Council
May 21, 2024

Recruit Academy
The SLOFD Recruit Fire Academy is ten weeks
long and is delivered through a distributed
learning model. The curriculum covers 15 areas
of core firefighter competencies within five
blocks of instruction, with each block consisting
of two weeks. Each block of instruction is
delivered through classroom lecture and daily
manipulative skills on the drill ground. At the
end of each block, recruits are tested utilizing a
block written examination and multiple
manipulative skills examinations. Each block of
instruction builds upon the previous block and
becomes increasingly more difficult. Throughout
the ten-week academy, recruits are evaluated
within the three domains of learning: cognitive,
psychomotor, and affective. This is to ensure
proper retention, recognition, and application
through real time scenarios and live burn
operations throughout the academy and gives
them opportunity to apply and perform their
newly attained skills in high stress situations.

Upon successful completion, the recruit
firefighter has met the NFPA 1001 standard for
professional qualifications for firefighting.

SLOFD completed one academy in 2023,
training seven firefighters and firefighter/
paramedics to deliver exceptional service to the
community.

BLOCK 1 - PPE, SCBA, Intubation
BLOCK 2 - Ladders, Cardioversion
BLOCK 3 - Ventilation, Hose Lays
BLOCK 4 - EMS, HPCPR, Extrication
BLOCK 5 - Wildland, UTV, USAR
26 Page 589 of 924

APPARATUS

Major Repairs
Mobile Radio
Programing and
Replacement
Battalion Chief
Vehicle Build
Mechanic 1 Service
Truck Build
T-1, E-4, E-6, Medic Rescue
DC vehicle code -3
lights updated
Engine 4
Deck gun complete overhaul
and air conditioning
383
Repair
Work Orders
320
Training Hours
4204
Service Hours
27 Page 591 of 924

EMERGENCY

MANAGEMENT

Accomplishments
SEMS and NIMS Training
Ensured all City employees completed
proper SEMS and National Incident
Management system courses
Emergency Preparedness and Response ensures
that City and all relevant City departments have
adequate planning, organization, and resources
for emergency preparedness and emergency
response.

EOC Activation
Activated 3 times
January Storms - Level 2
March Storms - Level 3
Lizzie Fire - Level 3
Preparedness Education
Public Events to improve disaster and
emergency readiness
Wildfire readiness night
Community flood readiness night
Fire Prevention Week and Open House
Parks and Recreation Monday Meet-Ups
28 Page 593 of 924
Promotions/New Hires
Deputy Chief
Sammy Fox
Battalion Chief
John MacDonald
Fire Captain
Richie Barrett
Fire Engineer
Dane Hutslar
Firefighter/Paramedic
Nate Greenelsh
Firefighter/Paramedic
Jaden Davis
Firefighter/Paramedic
Jake Barkhimer
Firefighter/EMT
Keanu Morrison
Firefighter/Paramedic
Casey DeLeuw
Firefighter/Paramedic
George Kaperonis
Firefighter/Paramedic
Maren McClanahan
Admin Specialist
Mika Timpano
29 Page 594 of 924
Events JAN
MAR
AUG
MAY
JUL
SEP
NOV
OCT
DEC
JUN
APR
FEB

RECRUIT

ACADEMY
23 THE WALL

THAT HEALS
BIKE

BREAKFAST
9/11

CEREMONY
FIRE OPS 101

FLOOD READINESS NIGHT

FILL THE BOOT

DOWNTOWN

US&R DRILL

PROMOTIONAL

CEREMONY

CAMP CINDER

WILDFIRE READINESS NIGHT

FLU VACCINE CLINIC

OPEN HOUSE

SEASON OF HOPE

F I R E S E A S O N
30 Page 595 of 924
2024: STRATEGIC PLAN

COMMUNITY FOCUSED

SERVICE

MAINTAIN EXCEPTIONAL

COMMUNITY FOCUSED PUBLIC
SERVICE DELIVERY. TO MEET THE

DEMANDS OF THE FUTURE,

UTILIZE RESPONSE DATA TO

PROVIDE ACCURATE, RELIABLE

FORECASTING AND QUALITY

BUSINESS ANALYTICS

ENHANCE A HEALTHY, SAFE,

AND PRODUCTIVE WORK
ENVIRONMENT.

MAINTAIN OR IMPROVE

FIRE PREVENTION

DIVISION RISK REDUCTION

IN SAN LUIS OBISPO

MAINTAIN AND IMPROVE

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

AND PREPAREDNESS FOR ALL

PERSON MADE AND NATURAL

LARGE-SCALE DISASTERS TO

MEET CURRENT AND FUTURE
NEEDS

ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL

DEVELOPMENT,

ORGANIZATION

DIVERSITY AND

ORGANIZATION SAFETY

THROUGH TRAINING
AND EDUCATION.

PROFESSIONAL

DEVELOPMENT &

TRAINING

HEALTH &

WELLNESS

EMERGENCY

PREPAREDNESS

COMMUNITY RISK

REDUCTION

TECHNOLOGY
& DATA

MAINTAIN AND

IMPROVE FIRE

DEPARTMENT

TECHNOLOGY AND

INFORMATION SYSTEM

THAT MEET THE

CURRENT AND FUTURE

NEEDS OF THE
DEPARTMENT. 31 Page 596 of 924

TOGETHER
WE MANAGE SLO’S FIRE RISK
@SLOCITYFD
@SLO FIRE
WWW.SLOCITY.ORG/FIRE

PREPARATION

MITIGATION

RESPONSE

RECOVERY

City of San Luis Obispo, Council Memorandum
City of San Luis Obispo
Council Agenda Correspondence
DATE: May 20, 2024
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Greg Hermann, Deputy City Manager
VIA: Whitney McDonald, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: ITEM 6e - CONSIDERATION OF THE 2024-25 HUMAN SERVICES

GRANT FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff received the following questions, regarding the funding decisions for the 2024-25 Human Services Grant Funding Recommendation. The questions are below with staff’s response shown in italics:
1) I am concerned that the HRC is recommending that CAPSLO receive no funding. “Homeless Prevention/Stable Housing Services” and “Families in Transition” seem to fit “Council’s primary funding priority “Homelessness prevention, including affordable and alternate housing, support services and transitional housing.” Why were CAPSLO’s requests denied? The Human Relations Commission engaged in critical analysis and careful deliberations to make the funding recommendations for the 2024-25 Human Services Grant program. The two applications received from CAPSLO fall within the main funding priority established by City Council. CAPSLO’s Homeless Prevention and Stable Housing Services application was originally allocated funding from the HRC Review Subcommittee. Upon completion of the public hearing and deliberation among all Commissioners, HRC decided to move the funding allocated to CAPSLO to other projects that based on their scope would have a greater impact considering the dollar amount, the number of individuals receiving services in the community, and the most efficient use of funds through an array of available services. HRC reviewed all applications considering the limited funding, the potential for highest impact in the community, and applied a comprehensive lens to ensure various services are available to individuals experiencing homelessness.
2) A link to the applications for review.

The following link provides access to the entire applications received for the 2024- 25 Human Services Grant program:

Grant Applications

Item 6e. 2024-25 Human Services Grant Funding Recommendations Page 2 3) A list of the HRC Review Subcommittee’s recommendations:

The following link provides access to the HRC Review Subcommittee’s recommendations for the 2024-25 Human Services Grant Program:

HRC Subcommittee Review Recommendations (see page 3 of the staff report) 4) Are there other alternatives that Council can consider regarding the funding allocations?
Yes, an additional alternative action may include:

The Council may return this item to the HRC with direction to provide funding to specific applications and to modify the remaining recommended funding allocations so as to not exceed the total budgeted amount of $150,000. This alternative could include direction regarding specific funding amounts for certain grant applications, as deemed appropriate by Council, and/or direction regarding priorities for allocation of the remaining funds. Following consideration by HRC, this item would return to Council for final award on a future agenda. 5) How much funding does the City currently provide to CAPSLO? For Fiscal Year 2024-25, it is anticipated that the City will provide CAPSLO a total of $317,046, as follows:
 40 Prado Operational Support: $123,000
 40 Prado Overnight Capacity Expansion: $63,826
 40 Prado Hotel Voucher Program: $45,000
 40 Prado Safe Parking Program: $17,000
 Warming Center: $10,000
 CDBG funding: $58,220

Item 6e
Department: Administration
Cost Center: 1010
For Agenda of: 5/21/2024
Placement: Consent
Estimated Time: N/A
FROM: Greg Hermann, Deputy City Manager
Prepared By: Nestor Veloz-Passalacqua, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE 2024-25 HUMAN SERVICES GRANT

FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDATION

1. As recommended by the Human Relations Commission, approve the 2024-25 Human Services Grant funding allocations in the total amount of $150,000; and

2. Authorize the Interim City Manager to execute agreements with each grant recipient, in a form approved by the City Attorney’.

POLICY CONTEXT
The Human Relations Commission’s (HRC) purpose is to advise and make recommendations to City Council and the City Manager which promote and advance inclusion, mutual understanding, respect, and equitable treatment to all members of the community. The Human Relations Commission’s recommendations to City Council help address social concerns and the needs of the community. The Human Services Grant (HSG) program provides financial support to non-profit organizations that promote the economic and social well-being of the residents of San Luis Obispo. The HSG grants are awarded at the discretion of the Council.

DISCUSSION
Background
The City’s Human Services Grants (HSG), formerly known as Grants-in-Aid, was originally discussed and approved by City Council on November 14, 1973 through a study session providing authority and responsibility to HRC for funding and contract recommendations for Council consideration. The HSG was designed to provide support to non-profit organizations to address the social service and basic human needs of various communities. The HSG program is fully funded by the City’s General Fund. The HSG had a Council approved change of name in 2022 to better reflect the objectives of the grant program. The HSG program provides financial support to non-profit organizations that promote the economic and social well-being of the community members of San Luis Obispo. Grants are made to local organizations, or to agencies that are based in neighboring communities, whose services contribute to the quality of life of City residents. The Human Relations Commission (HRC) advises the City Council on funding priorities and grant recommendations.

Item 6e
Funding Priorities
On November 16, 2021, the Council adopted the following as the primary funding priority for the HSG:
 Homelessness prevention, including affordable and alternative housing, support services and transitional housing.

To allow maximum flexibility for funding recommendations dependent upon the received applications, the following priorities were also approved but were not ranked:
 Hunger and malnutrition prevention.
 Supportive physical and mental health services for those in need.  Services for seniors, veterans and/or people with disabilities in need.  Supportive, developmental, and care services for children and youth in need.  Services encouraging diversity, equity, and inclusivity in marginalized.

HSG Application Process
In January 22, 2024, the HRC formally launched its annual HSG process by advertising the availability of grant funds and information regarding the upcoming HSG timeline to the general public, past applicants and agencies and groups from underserved and underrepresented communities through the City’s Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). HSG applications were due on March 1, 2024. The City received grant applications from 37 agencies requesting funding for programs totaling $495,243.

Attachment A includes a complete list of the applications, including a summary of each application, submitted to the City for HSG funding, and the HRC’s recommended funding amounts.

HRC Review Process
On March 12 and 19, 2024, the HSG Grant Review Subcommittee comprised of Vice Chair Kasprzak, Commissioner DeTurris, and Commissioner Carlotti met to review grant applications and make preliminary funding recommendations. The subcommittee members considered the funding priorities set by Council, the location of the target population to be served, and the incurred expenses proposed to be offset by HSG dollars to guide their funding recommendations. On April 3, 2024, the HSG Grant Review Subcommittee presented preliminary grant recommendations to the full HRC during a noticed public hearing. During the discussion, the subcommittee engaged with other Commissioners to adjust the preliminary recommendations and the Commission voted to approve the funding recommendations reflected in Attachment A. HRC found that the projects recommended for funding further Council’s adopted goals to address community needs and promote the economic and social well-being of San Luis Obispo community members.

Item 6e
Grants Contracts
Upon Council approval of HSG funding recommendations, the City will enter into a contract with each organization that has been awarded grant funding. The HRC and the City staff will review grant project reports throughout the year. Organizations awarded grant funding are required to provide a mid-year and year-end report describing administrative functions, metrics and outcomes, and use of funds related to the application for each grant program. Reports are reviewed by staff and the HRC for completeness and compliance. The form of the contract will be reviewed by the City Attorney’s office.

Public Engagement
The public, and more specifically non-profit service organizations, were engaged throughout the HSG award process. Non-profit service organizations received communication of available funding, an informational session provided in English and Spanish available in the Office of DEI website, technical assistance during the application period, a detailed grant web application outlining funding criteria, and how to access support from staff. This item is on the consent agenda for the May 21, 2024 City Council meeting and will follow all required posting and notification. The public can submit comments on this item at or before the meeting.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act does not apply to the recommended action in this report, because the action does not constitute a “Project” under CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15378.

FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: Yes Budget Year: 2024-25
Funding Identified: Yes
Fiscal Analysis:

Funding
Sources
Total Budget
Available
Current
Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing
Cost
General Fund $150,000 $150,000 $0 $0
State
Federal
Fees
Other:

Total $150,000 $150,000 $0 $0
As adopted in the 2023-2025 Financial Plan, the allocated 2024-2025 budget for the HSG program was $150,000. HSG projects will be implemented for a period of one year starting at the beginning of the 2024-2025 Fiscal Year.

Item 6e

ALTERNATIVES
The Council may modify the proposed grant funding amounts. The Council should provide direction on the modifications desired.

ATTACHMENTS
A – 2024-25 Human Services Grant Preliminary Funding Recommendations B – 04-03-2024 HRC Meeting Minutes

2024-25 Human Services Grant Preliminary Funding Recommendations Organization Project or Program Description of Project/Program Requested Amount
Recommended
Amount
1 5 Cities Homeless
Coalition
Homeless Prevention
& Rapid Re-Housing
This program provides wrap-around services including
case management and direct financial assistance with a
special emphasis on the housing support program. It will ensure services are low-barrier and accessible and assist them to resolve their housing crisis before focusing on other non-housing related services. The use of the funds will be for rental assistance and relocation stabilization (staff & application fees and deposit).
$20,000 $10,000
2 Big Brothers Big
Sisters of San
Luis Obispo
County
Mentoring to Help
Disadvantaged Youth
Meet their Full
Potential
This program provides professional caseworkers to pair
and sustain mentoring relationships for disadvantaged
youth residing SLO. Caseworkers (bilingual) will screen, train, pair with a mentor, support, assess, and provide referrals to address physical, mental health, and
developmental service needs, including connections to
hunger prevention programs. The funds will be used for
local government/schools and for staff salaries.
$10,000 $0
3 CASA of San Luis
Obispo County,
Inc.

General SLO CASA
Program Support
This program advocates for the best interests of abused and neglected children within the court system. CASA
recruits, trains, and supervises volunteers who advocate for this vulnerable population with the goal of ensuring that each and every child grows up in a safe, nurturing, and permanent home. The funds will be used for rent and
utilities.
$20,000 $10,000
4 City Farm
2025 Youth
Empowerment
Program
This program supports the Summer of 2025, City Farm
SLO’s Youth Empowerment Program (YEP) will provide
1,500 individual instruction hours to 35 teens. 5,000
pounds of produce will be delivered to the SLO Food Bank as a result of programming, impacting thousands of
residents. The funds will be used for two facilitators, a farmer, food and beverage, tools and materials, and
liability insurance.
$15,000 $8,948
5 Community
Action
Partnership of
SLO County
Homeless
Prevention/Stable
Housing Services
This program will provide emergency financial assistance to residents in households in SLO that are at risk of being evicted and need help with a rental payment, or who need support securing housing with first month’s rent and/or a security deposit. The funds will be used for financial
assistance payments and "indirect expenses @8%".
$10,000 $0

6 Community
Action
Partnership of
SLO County
Families in Transition
(FIT)
This program is a long-standing program and partnership with SLCUSD focused on supporting homeless students
and their families. This project is intended to support 10 families with children (five homeless, five at risk for eviction) enrolled in SLCUSD that reside in the city. The funds will be used for housing-related case management
services (described above) and direct financial support to secure and maintain permanent housing for these youth
and their families.
$10,000 $0
7 Community
Counseling
Center
Sharing the
Therapeutic Space:

Professional and
Affordable
Psychotherapy
Options for
Underprivileged
Populations in the City
of San Luis Obispo
This program supports the small collective of volunteer therapists and coordinators of a flourishing organization that serves thousands of low-income residents, students, and unhoused individuals and provides training
opportunities to current and future mental health
professionals. The funds will be used towards 3 salaries, telehealth annual fee, rent/mortgage, and operating
expenses.
$5,000 $0
8 Corazon Latino
Support Groups -
Corazon Latino
Central Coast
This program will have reoccurring focus groups where
marginalized communities will have access to multiple
agencies providing information and support regarding
homeless prevention, hunger and malnutrition prevention, language services, and physical/mental health services. It also aims to provide childcare, food, and ongoing rotation of partner agencies at these support groups. The funds will be used towards 5 salaries and food & beverage.
$20,000 $0
9 Diversity
Coalition
BIPOC Board
Leadership Training
Program
This project supports the ongoing efforts of the BIPOC
Board Leadership program that conducts 2 trainings per
year with 12-15 diverse BIPOC participants, that is
followed by board placement assistance for BIPOC
individuals with nonprofit boards. It also supports their partnership with Spokes in providing DEI trainings to
agencies aiming to diversify their boards. The funds will be used for staff salary, training materials, and meals for cohort.
$10,000 $0
10 Family Matters
Consulting
Circle of Security -
Prevention Program
This program aims to address the systematic injustices
marginalized children experience in the education system.

This is done by addressing the challenges by
implementing evidence-based interventions with Circle of Security focused on promoting equity and inclusion in
early childhood education. The funds will be used for two facilitators and one program coordinator who will provide accessible support groups.
$15,000 $0

11 Food Bank of SLO
County
No-Cook Bags for
SLO County
Residents
Experiencing
Homelessness
This program will provide continued funding for our NoCook Bags program, bags of portable foods designed for homeless residents who do not have access to a kitchen
and cannot benefit from typical Food Bank distribution
items. This program has proven to be very successful in the City of San Luis Obispo, with approximately 1,500 NoCook Bags distributed each month to homeless residents of the city to ensure access to nutritious meals. The funds will be used to purchase food for program.
$20,000.00 $0
12 Hospice of SLO
County
Caregiver Support and
Grief Counseling
This program is meant to offer a variety of services to help keep home caregivers healthy and well as they care for a loved one with a life-limiting diagnosis. The funds for this program will be to support the personnel costs associated with sustaining the Caregiver Support and Grief
Counseling program so that they can meet the
community’s ongoing need for in-home caregiver support
and grief counseling services.
$20,000 $0
13 Housing Authority
San Luis Obispo
Housing Stability with
Supportive Housing
Program
This program's objectives include housing stability,
transitioning from homelessness and rapid-rehoused and
evection prevention. The funds will be focused on 4 areas including transportation, hunger, transitional housing, and incentives and this program intends to serve 1,099
residents in the city.
$20,000 $10,000
14 Independent
Living Resource
Center
Disability Rights and
Cultural Awareness in
San Luis Obispo
The program will focus on providing a series of workshops to community members in two key areas Workshop Focus
#1: Advocacy Skill Development and Workshop Focus #2:

Disability Inclusion in the Workplace, followed by a
Disability Culture Night. The funds will be for workshop consultant, travel, lodging, space, supplies, support, and access accommodations.
$8,691 $0
15 Jack's Helping
Hand
Assistance for Single
Mothers of Children
with Special Needs in
the City of San Luis
Obispo
This program is designed to empower and enable families, professionals, and the broader community to meet the
unique physical, mental, and medical needs of special
children and young adults under the age of 21 within SLO County. There are currently 35 children receiving direct assisted, 54% of whom are being cared for by a single or divorced parent. The funds will be used for food gift cards, lodging for out of town medical appointments,
transportation/fuel expenses, medical equipment, medical bills and emergency needs.
$10,000 $5,000

16 Jewish Family
Services of San
Luis Obispo
Homeless Support
Services
This program will provide necessary support services to the homeless population by offering services such as:

DMV registration, vehicle insurance, car repair, and gas cards; additional needed assistance for items such as:
storage, food, impound fees, propane, rent and deposits, medical and legal expenses. The grant will be used for
operating and administrative costs.
$7,300 $7,300
17 Literacy for Life The Literacy Program
This program's mission is to recruit and train community members to become volunteer tutors to work one-on-one
with learners and guide them to set and meet their
individual literacy learning goal (s). The goals can be as vary by the needs of the student. The funds will be used for general operating expenses.
$10,000 $10,000
18 Long Term Care
Ombudsman
Services of San
Luis Obispo
County
Ombudsman Services
This program has services for people who live in long term care facilities (skilled nursing or residential care facilities for the elderly) or who are seeking information about
facilities. Services include resident advocacy, facility monitoring visits, complaint investigations and resolution, information and assistance, and systemic advocacy. The
funds will be used for staff salaries.
$5,000 $5,000
19 Lumina Alliance
Emergency Shelter
Program for Sexual
Assault and Intimate
Partner Violence
Survivors
This program is the only agency on the Central Coast that operates a rape crisis center and has shelters that are consistently at capacity and receive an ever-increasing number of requests for services and calls to the 24/7 Crisis & Information Line. The funds will be used for utilities, equipment, repair, and food to support general operating costs, as well as any necessary repairs, for our shelters that arise.
$20,000 $10,000
20 One Cool Earth Garden Education
Program
The project will support our programming at four (4) SLO school gardens, providing year-long nutrition learning for 1669 students. A Garden Educator is provided to school
campuses who teach a series of 108 seasonally-aligned,
hands-on, and standard-based lessons per school per
year. The Garden Educator will also hold two (2)
community garden workdays and one family cooking night
per school. The funds will be used for educator wages,
garden supplies, and cooking supplies.
$5,000 $0

21 PathPoint
Independent Living
Technology for People
with I/DD
This program will provide independent living technology that will enable people with intellectual disabilities and developmental disabilities served in the Independent
Living Services (ILS) and Coordinated Family Supports
(CFS) to learn the skills necessary to retain stable
housing, live productive lives, and achieve maximum
independence. The funds will be used for smart home
hubs, automated medication dispensers, tablets, visual
alert systems, livescribe pens, smart cooking devices,
smart televisions, smartwatches, and electric lift desks. $15,000 $0
22 People's Self-Help
Housing
Corporation
SLO Supportive
Housing Program for
Low-Income
Households
This program will provide an average of 16 hours of
service every week benefitting PSHH’s San Luis Obispo
residents. New residents receive information about SHP
services upon move-in from Residence Managers, who
live onsite. Managers also provide additional outreach
whenever a resident speaks to them about a particular
difficulty with which social workers could assist.
$20,000 $0
23 Pregnancy and
Parenting Support
of SLO County
Nurture SLO Families
This program provides local families with emotional
support, practical assistance, and connections to
community resources from pregnancy through early
childhood. They offer free psychotherapy with trained
clinicians through partnership with Community Counseling Center. The funds will be used for 3 staff positions, rent, program supplies and staff training.
$15,000 $0
24 RACE MATTERS
SLO Shop Talk
This project seeks funds to support 12 monthly programs centered on Black wellness and healing, as well as
wellness and healing for other communities of color,
through our program, “Shop Talk,” which advances health equity and wellbeing through clinician-led discussion
groups. The funds will be used for all costs (staff,
honoraria, facility rental, admin, cleaning, marking, food, and supplies.
$10,000 $0
25 Restorative
Partners, Inc. Opportunity to Fund
These programs designed to assist individuals facing
financial barriers, mental health issues, and substance abuse challenges as they reintegrate into our community.

This year, they expect to assist 80 individuals as they work to overcome homelessness, unemployment, and stigma.

The funds will be used for client's emergency needs.
$10,000 $0

26 San Luis Obispo
Child
Development
Resource Center
Child and Family Play
Therapy Program
This program will fund the therapy team in providing
additional counseling and rehabilitation services. Grant funds will expand services, accommodating 20 additional therapy clients annually. The funds will be used to provide 325 therapy hours and 8 hours of professional
development, focusing on cultural competencies.
$10,000 $0
27 San Luis Obispo
Committee for
Education on
Alcoholism, dba
Middle House
Alumni Housing
This project seeks to help clients of Middle House to
relocate to independent living after a satisfactory stay at Middle House, which is difficult to find housing due the extreme expense of pre-rental requirements (i.e.., security deposit, first & last months’ rent, etc.).
$6,250 $6,250
28 San Luis Obispo
Committee for
Education on
Alcoholism, dba
Middle House
Homeless Prevention
This project seeks to help clients of Middle House with the opportunity to continue and improve their path of recovery and wellness in a safe, healthy, and appropriate
environment.
$5,600 $5,600
29 San Luis Obispo
County Bicycle
Coalition, dba
Bike SLO County
Cycling Without Age
The new Bike SLO County program, Cycling Without Age,
addresses social isolation for seniors by offering bicycle rides for those who can no longer cycle. The funds will be used for materials, marketing, insurance, and background checks to increase volunteer efforts.
$5,500 $0
30 San Luis Obispo
Legal Assistance
Foundation
Senior Legal Services
This program provides assistance to approximately 2,000 SLO County residents in need of legal assistance or
referrals to other resources, 700+ being seniors. SLSP’s resulting caseload of 250+ clients each year includes civil matters such as homelessness prevention, elder abuse,
consumer finance, government benefits appeals, and
preparing for incapacity/end-of-life. The funds will be used for all operating costs.
$20,000 $0
31 Senior Nutrition
Program Meals that Connect
This program strives to meet the growing needs to feed
the senior population, especially those who are at or below the poverty level. The funds will be used to cover food costs, kitchen staff labor, supplies, rent, transportation cost for our San Luis Obispo dining site at the United Church of Christ Congregational.
$15,000 $7,500
32 Shower the
People Shower the People
The program will continue to provide access to a free
shower to the homeless at our current four (4) sites in San Luis Obispo. It provides clients with a shower as well as a new pair of underwear, socks, t-shirts, a comb, and hand sanitizer.
$20,000 $20,000

33 SLO County
UndocuSupport
Direct Housing Aid for
Immigrant Families
This program is intended to provide aid to local
undocumented focused community-based-organizations
that directly interface with the undocumented population to provide direct housing aid in the form of rental assistance, security deposit, and/or utility payment to avoid shut-off.

The funds will be used for grants, staff, and administrative fees.
$7,442 $7,442
34 SLO Noor
Foundation
Whole Community
Care Project
This program will open a solely owned and operated
mobile health clinic in addition to expanding capacity at its existing two clinic sites in San Luis Obispo. It will provide new and existing clinical programs, a new care
coordination program, and a new community outreach
campaign to better reach and serve “hard-to-reach”
populations in the City of San Luis Obispo. The funds will be used for staffing and program services.
$20,000 $0
35 Smart Share
Housing
Solutions
Community Housing
Provisions/Homeless
Prevention
The program is a two-pronged approach, providing
immediate direct housing to City residents and planning for broader longer term housing support in upcoming years
through the Waterman Village Residency Plan. The funds
will be used for research, training, stakeholder input, draft review and final draft.
$14,460 $5,960
36 Transitions
Mental Health
Association
Growing Grounds
Downtown
This program is one of three Growing Grounds social
enterprises that provides vocational training and paid
employment to 20 TMHA clients with the hopes of adding
4 clients, with a focus on individuals who are at risk of homelessness. The funds will be used for staff salaries, client wages, PR taxes, credit card/service charges,
insurance, and telecommunication.
$20,000 $10,000
37 United Way of
San Luis Obispo
Community -Driven
Initiative in San Luis
Obispo: Preventing
Poverty and Building a
Sustainable
Community
This program focuses on two primary areas of impact that include community collaboration and poverty prevention by providing tax resources, a resource fair, a financial literacy program, and by increasing volunteer engagement. The
funds will be used for staff salaries, administrative costs, advertising, "miscellaneous," and platform subscriptions. $20,000 $11,000
TOTAL $495,243 $150,000

1 Human Relations Commission Minutes
April 3, 2024, 5:00 p.m.

Council Hearing Room, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo
Human Relations
Commissioners

Present:

Commissioner Catuih Campos, Commissioner Stephanie
Carlotti, Commissioner Vincent DeTurris, Commissioner Sierra Smith, Vice Chair Angie Kasprzak, Chair Dusty Colyer-Worth Human Relations
Commissioners

Absent:

Commissioner Taryn Warrecker
City Staff Present: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Manager Nestor VelozPassalacqua, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Management Fellow Matthew Melendrez
_____________________________________________________________________

1. CALL TO ORDER
A Regular Meeting of the San Luis Obispo Human Relations Commission was called to order on April 3, 2024, at 5:02 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, by Chair Colyer-Worth.

2. OATH OF OFFICE
On March 19, 2024, the City Council approved the annual appointment to City Advisory Bodies, which appointed Angela Kasprzak to an additional 4-year term on the Human Relations Commission, commencing on April 1, 2024.

3. ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR
By consensus, the Human Relations Commission elected the following members:

Elect Angie Kasprzak to the position of Chair for a one-year term.

Elect Catuih Campos to the position of Vice Chair for a one-year term.

2 Ayes (6): Commissioner Campos, Commissioner Carlotti, Commissioner DeTurris, Commissioner Smith, Vice Chair Kasprzak, and Chair Colyer-Worth Absent (1): Commissioner Warrecker
CARRIED (6 to 0)

4. PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Public Comment:

None

5. CONSENT

5.a CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES - MARCH 6, 2024 HUMAN RELATIONS

COMMISSION MINUTES
Motion By Commissioner Smith
Second By Commissioner Campos
To approve the Human Relations Commission Minutes of March 6, 2024.

CARRIED

6. BUSINESS ITEMS

6.a RECEIVE A PRESENTATION FROM THE CA CIVIL RIGHTS

DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY CONFLICT RESOLUTION UNIT
DEI Manager Nestor Veloz-Passalacqua presented the staff report and responded to Commission inquiries.

Chair Colyer-Worth opened Public Comment
Public Comment:

None
--End of Public Comment--
Chair Colyer-Worth closed Public Comment
The Human Relations Commission to receive a presentation about the efforts and support provided by the California Civil Rights Department Community Conflict Resolution Unit.

Action: No formal action was taken on this item.

3 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS

7.a REVIEW 2024-25 HUMAN SERVICES GRANT SUBCOMMITTEE

RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION TO

COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL
DEI Manager Nestor Veloz-Passalacqua presented the staff report and responded to Commission inquiries.

Chair Colyer-Worth opened Public Comment
Public Comment:

Susan Lamont
Dan Cano
Arturo Guevara
Leila Daniel
Molly Kern
Devin McQuade
Chelsea Ruiz
Greg Ellis
--End of Public Comment--
Chair Colyer-Worth closed Public Comment
Motion By Commissioner Carlotti
Second By Commissioner Smith
Receive preliminary recommendations from the Human Services Grant Subcommittee and provide a recommendation to the City Council for final approval.

The final 2024-25 Human Services Grant recommendations are as follows:

Organization Allocation
5 Cities Homeless Coalition $10,000
CASA of San Luis Obispo County, Inc. $10,000
City Farm $8,948
Housing Authority San Luis Obispo $10,000
Jack's Helping Hand $5,000
Jewish Family Services of San Luis Obispo $7,300
Literacy for Life $10,000

4 Long Term Care Ombudsman Services of SLO County $5,000 Lumina Alliance $10,000
San Luis Obispo Committee for Education on Alcoholism,
dba Middle House $6,250
San Luis Obispo Committee for Education on Alcoholism,
dba Middle House $5,600
Senior Nutrition Program – Meals that Connect $7,500
Shower the People $20,000
SLO County UndocuSupport $7,442
Smart Share Housing Solutions $5,960
Transitions Mental Health Association $10,000
United Way of San Luis Obispo $11,000
TOTAL $150,000
Ayes (6): Commissioner Campos, Commissioner Carlotti, Commissioner DeTurris, Commissioner Smith, Vice Chair Kasprzak, and Chair ColyerWorth Absent (1): Commissioner Warrecker
CARRIED (6 to 0)

8. COMMENT AND DISCUSSION

8.a STAFF & COMMISSIONER UPDATES AND AGENDA FORECAST
DEI Manager Nestor Veloz-Passalacqua provided the following update of upcoming projects:

1. Multicultural programming series

2. Budget change to make full time position for DEI Office

9. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 7:50 p.m. The next Regular Meeting of the Human Relations Commission is scheduled for May 1, 2024, at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room at City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo. _________________________
APPROVED BY HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION: 05/01//2024

Item 6f
Department: Community Development
Cost Center: 4006
For Agenda of: 5/21/2024
Placement: Consent
Estimated Time: N/A
FROM: Timmi Tway, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Michael Loew, Deputy Director/Chief Building Official; John Mezzapesa, Deputy Building Official
SUBJECT: DECLARATION OF INTENT TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON JULY 2, 2024, REGARDING 205 CASA STREET/1067 MURRAY AVENUE

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Draft Resolution entitled, “Resolution of the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo finding that the property at 205 Casa Street and 1067 Murray Avenue may constitute a public nuisance, and ordering a public hearing concerning same and abatement thereof” setting a public hearing for July 2, 2024, to consider whether a public nuisance exits at 205 Casa Street and 1067 Murray Avenue.

POLICY CONTEXT
The Code Enforcement Division is charged with promoting health and safety within the City of San Luis Obispo though various enforcement methodologies. In general, the procedures are designed to gain compliance at the lowest enforcement level possible; however, enforcement may escalate when necessary. San Luis Obispo Municipal Code (SLOMC) Section 8.24 “Nuisance Abatement” sets forth a process to address public nuisances identified within the city to protect public peace, health, safety and general welfare. SLOMC 8.24 clearly designates scenarios in which a public nuisance exists and outlines the steps required for declaring a nuisance and abatement by the city.

The Community Development Director is granted authority to make decisions and interpretations regarding health and safety violations and interpreting applications of the code in violations cited by Code Enforcement Officials (SLOMC 1.24). This authority is often delegated to the Deputy Director/Chief Building Official to carry out such relevant duties. SLOMC 1.24 authorizes the City to issue Administrative Citations for code violations and outlines the policies and procedures regarding escalating code enforcement action.

DISCUSSION

Item 6f
Background
SLOMC section 8.24.020 describes the scenarios that constitute a public nuisance which, at the discretion of the city, may be abated in accordance with the nuisance abatement process. These scenarios are as follows:

A. Any structure, as defined in the Building Code, which exists, or which is maintained or used upon any premises in violation of any requirement or prohibition of any law, ordinance or permit, including, without limitation, requirements or prohibitions related to location, construction, condition, maintenance, use, or time period limitation.

B. Any premises upon which there exists any condition, thing or use in violation of any requirement or prohibition of any law, ordinance or permit related to the condition, maintenance or use of the premises.

C. Any unlawful encroachment which obstructs or interferes with the free passage or use by the public of any public sidewalk, street, alley or right-of-way.

D. The occurrence of more than two loud or unruly assemblages in any sixty-day period that threatens the public peace, health, safety or general welfare and requires a police response to control the threat to the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare. The determination of a public nuisance under this subsection shall expire eighteen months after the date of the resolution ordering abatement as set forth in Section 8.24.110 of this chapter.

E. As applied to this chapter, the determination of a “response” will be when the police department responds to a location, observes a violation of applicable state or municipal violations, and the tenant is issued a disturbance advisement card, a citation, or is arrested for the applicable violation.

F. Anything constituting a public nuisance as specifically defined or declared by any other law or ordinance.

Process for Abatement of a Public Nuisance
The process for abatement of a public nuisance involves, first, the adoption of a resolution by Council declaring that a nuisance may exist at a given parcel (SLOMC 8.24.040.) If, based, on the recommendation by the city administrative officer or department head, Council finds that a nuisance may exist, a public hearing is set via resolution to discuss the details of the potential nuisance. Notification of the hearing is posted on site and mailed to the property owner. (SLOMC 8.24.050-8.24.060.) During the public hearing, City staff will present their evidence regarding the existence of a public nuisance and the cost associated with potential abatement of the declared nuisance if not abated by the property owner within the timeframe established by Council. The property owner and any other witnesses or interested parties will also have the opportunity to present any statements or evidence to Council. (SLOMC 8.24.080.) If Council finds that a nuisance exists, the property owner will be given 30 days, or such other time limit as Council may specify, to remediate the identified violations. (SLOMC 8.24.090.) If the property owner fails to remediate the violations, the City shall abate the violations. (see SLOMC 8.24.100-

8.24.120.) All costs associated with an abatement performed by the City will be brought back to Council for confirmation. (SLOMC 8.24.140.)

Item 6f
The property owner shall be personally liable to the City for the abatement costs confirmed by the resolution and, if left unpaid, the abatement costs shall constitute a special assessment against the respective lot or parcel of land to which it relates, and upon recordation in the office of the County Recorder of a notice of lien, shall constitute a lien on the property for the amount of such assessment. (SLOMC 8.24.150.) Basis of Staff’s Recommendation
The following information is provided so Council may consider, based on staff’s recommendation, whether to declare that a nuisance may exist at 205 Casa Street/1067 Murray, pursuant to SLOMC 8.24.040; Council is not being asked to make affirmative findings as to the condition of the property at this time.

Code Enforcement staff has documented the property located at the southwest corner of the Casa Street and Murray Avenue intersection, Parcel # 001-031-016 consisting of two single family residences with addresses 205 Casa Street & 1067 Murray, to be vacant, in a state of disrepair and largely unmaintained since January 2022. The property is believed to have been vacant since 2015 based on water usage records. The lack of maintenance and control from the property owner has led to over 80 calls for service to the Police Department since 2018, as well as recent Code Enforcement action related to the state of the property. Code Enforcement first inspected the site in January of 2022 after receiving a citizen complaint regarding vacant structures, scattered debris and trespassing by transients. The inspection revealed an accumulation of trash and debris on site, as well as damaged building elements such as missing stairway railings, broken doors and removed doorway barricades.

Between January 2022 and June of 2023, the City of San Luis Obispo’s Code Enforcement Division tracked the decline of the property maintenance and the structures on site while maintaining continued communication with the property owner. In June of 2022 Code Enforcement staff issued three administrative citations totaling $6,400 before receiving contact from the property owner, who, at the time, advised that he was having trouble keeping transients from entering the property. The property owner worked to clean up the exterior of the property through December 2022 but continued to maintain that, as an out of the area owner, he had difficulty in keeping transients off of the property.

Numerous issues remained to be addressed regarding maintenance of the structures on site. With the conditions of the property continuing to decline, staff reached out to the property owner multiple times in June of 2023. Staff advised the property owner that if the property condition continued to worsen, the City would consider its remediation options.

Between December 2022 and October of 2023, the structure’s state of deterioration drastically worsened, with documentation of broken windows, doors, and other structures on site as well as accumulation of trash and debris, overgrown vegetation and continued reports of suspicious and trespass activity. This condition of the property resulted in the issuance of daily fines totaling an additional $42,000 and rendering it necessary for the issuance of an order for the structure to be boarded up by November 11, 2023.

Item 6f
By November 30th, 2023, the Chief Building Official (CBO) and Code Enforcement Officer observed conditions that were determined to be imminent dangers, such as structurally unsound stairs, missing door hardware, collapsed ceiling and electrical hazards. Staff concluded that these hazards were all related to the unsecure nature of the structures.

The conditions presented an unmitigated, imminent danger to the life and health of entrants to the structure and surrounding neighbors. As a result of the imminent danger associated with this structure, the CBO authorized, though contracted services, the installation of temporary safeguards such as disconnection of electrical services and physical boarding of all entry points in compliance with the Boarding Standards found in Appendix A of the International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC) to prevent harm caused by further entry upon the dangerous property.

Since boarding of the structures on site in December of 2023, the code violations remain unresolved. The exterior areas of the property remain open to the public and furniture continues to be dumped on site. The deteriorated state of the property and continued property maintenance violations meet the criteria for the existence of a public nuisance as described in SLOMC 8.24.020(A).

Staff’s recommendation is to address the continued activities at this location by first declaring that a public nuisance may exist. Council will have the opportunity to hear evidence and testimony regarding the condition of the property prior to making a final determination regarding the declaration of a public nuisance during the public hearing on July 2, 2024. If the City Council finds that a public nuisance exists on July 2, 2024, the property owner will be given 30 days, or such other time limit as Council may specify, to remediate the identified violations. If no remediation occurs by the stated deadline, the City Clerk will file with the County Recorder a certificate that the property is a public nuisance and that the owner has been notified thereof. City staff will coordinate efforts to remediate all debris, overgrown vegetation, and potentially install fencing to prevent future trespassing. City staff will keep an accounting of abatement costs, which will be submitted to Council for confirmation and assessment against the property. (SLOMC 8.24.140-

8.24.150.)
Public Engagement
Though not legally required at this stage, the property owner has been notified, by written notice sent via email, first-class mail to the property owner’s last known address, and by telephone on May 1, 2024, of today’s Council meeting and staff’s recommendation to Council to declare that a public nuisance may exist at this property.

The adoption of the recommended resolution sets forth a public hearing for all interested parties to speak upon the subject. A certified copy of the resolution and Notice of Public Hearing shall be posted on the premises and mailed to the property owner as required by Section 8.24.050-8.24.060 of the Municipal Code.

Item 6f

CONCURRENCE
The City Attorney’s Office, Police Department and Fire Department concur with staff’s recommendation.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to the recommended action in this report, because the action does not constitute a “Project” under CEQA Guidelines Section 15378.

FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: No Budget Year: 2023-24
Funding Identified: No
There is no immediate fiscal impact as a result of setting a public hearing. Should Council declare that a public nuisance exists in the subsequent hearing and the property owner does not voluntarily comply, the City would initially incur costs associated with abatement.

Final costs would be borne by the property owner and, if reimbursement is not received directly, would constitute a lien upon such premises. The lien shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary municipal taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure under foreclosure and sale in case of delinquency as provided for ordinary municipal taxes (SLOMC 8.24.150.) Estimated costs will be presented during public hearing.

Fiscal Analysis:

Funding
Sources
Total Budget
Available
Current
Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing
Cost
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0
State
Federal
Fees
Other:

Total $0 $0 $0 $0

ALTERNATIVES
Council could decide that there is insufficient information to declare that a public nuisance may exist. This action is not recommended by staff because there is ample history to show that the impact of the abandoned, vacant structures has caused and will continue to cause negative impacts to the surrounding area. The property owner has not shown any evidence that he is willing and able to address the continued issues.

ATTACHMENTS
A - Draft Resolution declaring a public nuisance may exist at 205 Casa/1067 Murray

R _____
RESOLUTION NO. _______ (2024 SERIES)

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT THE PROPERTY AT 205 CASA STREET AND 1067 MURRAY AVENUE MAY CONSTITUTE A PUBLIC

NUISANCE, AND ORDERING A PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING

SAME AND ABATEMENT THEREOF
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo finds that the condition of the premises at 205 Casa Street and 1067 Murray Avenue, and more particularly described as Lot 8, Block 34, Mt. Pleasanton Square, and shown as Assessor's Parcel No. 001-031-016 in the County of San Luis Obispo, may constitute a public nuisance; and WHEREAS, the premises are maintained in such a manner as to constitute a violation of law. Trash and debris are stored in and around the house, vegetation is unmaintained, and the structure’s current state exists in violation of property maintenance codes such that a serious and ongoing health and life-safety hazard is presented; and WHEREAS, possible methods of abatement of the property would include:
removal of any items and materials constituting a fire and/or health hazard, rehabilitation, repair, or demolition of the premises, or other appropriate actions, which shall be more fully considered and determined at a forthcoming public hearing on this matter; and WHEREAS, if the property owner does not voluntarily comply, abatement may be completed by the City and all costs would be borne by the property owner and would constitute a lien upon such premises until full payment is received.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:

SECTION 1. The Council intends to hold a public hearing in the Council Chambers at 5:30 p.m. on July 2, 2024, to ascertain whether said premises constitutes a public nuisance which may be abated in accordance with Chapter 8.24 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code.

Resolution No. _____ (2024 Series) Page 2
R _____
SECTION 2. The City Clerk is directed to provide notice of the public hearing to the property owner as required by San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Sections 8.24.050 and 8.24.060.

Upon motion of Council Member ___________, seconded by Council Member ___________, and on the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

The foregoing resolution was adopted this _____ day of _______________ 2024. ___________________________
Mayor Erica A. Stewart
ATTEST:
____________________________
Teresa Purrington,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
J. Christine Dietrick,
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________. ___________________________
Teresa Purrington,
City Clerk

Item 6g
Department: Public Works
Cost Center: 4003
For Agenda of: 5/21/2024
Placement: Consent
Estimated Time: N/A
FROM: Timmi Tway, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Luke Schwartz, Transportation Manager
Brent Taylor, Financial Analyst
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR 600

TANK FARM PROJECT

RECOMMENDATION

1. Adopt a Draft Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, approving Amendment No. 1 to the 600 Tank Farm Reimbursement Agreement”; and

2. Authorize the transfer of $267,138.10 from the Airport Area Specific Plan Transportation Impact Fee undesignated fund balance (Fund 503) to the Development Agreements project account (2000056-01).

POLICY CONTEXT
Public improvements associated with the 600 Tank Farm Project are being installed in greater size and capacity than required to serve only the project (i.e. Excess Public Improvements), qualifying the developer for reimbursement as set forth in San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 4.56.080 and 16.20.110. Because of this, the developer and City have entered into a Reimbursement Agreement, and that agreement needs to be amended to update the costs which are the basis of the reimbursement obligation.

REPORT-IN-BRIEF
The Reimbursement Agreement for 600 Tank Farm Road, executed between the City and Covelop, Inc. (the “Developer”) in February 2022, specifies that the City will provide reimbursements to the Developer for certain oversized transportation improvements eligible for reimbursement. Reimbursement is to be provided from a mix of fund sources, including General Fund and Transportation Impact Fees (TIF). The Reimbursement Agreement originally included estimates provided by the Developer for the cost of these improvements; however, since then, the anticipated costs of these improvements have significantly increased above the original estimates, which requires an amendment to the agreement.

Item 6g
Need for a Reimbursement Agreement Amendment
Mirroring national and local trends of significant infrastructure construction cost escalation over the past several years, actual costs for the public improvements included in the Reimbursement Agreement have escalated significantly beyond original estimates. This has been exacerbated by added complexity, administrative costs, and delays related to challenges with regulatory agency permitting and right-of-way acquisition for the Tank Farm/Santa Fe Roundabout. As a result of these circumstances, the Developer has submitted change orders to the original cost estimates identifying an additional $4,818,675 in reimbursable costs, increasing the total reimbursement-eligible project costs from $5,003,980 to $9,822,654.

The original and updated reimbursement costs are summarized in Table 1 below, and broken down in detail in Attachment B.

Table 1: Reimbursable Project Cost Summary
Not reflected in the table above are the Developer’s share of these costs, which are not eligible for public reimbursement, which currently total approximately $5.3 million.

Pursuant to Section 6(a), 6(b), and 6(c) of the Reimbursement Agreement, any increase or decrease in cost must be reflected in the contractor bid or change order and approved by the City. The developer has submitted change orders and cost documentation totaling $4,818,675 which exceeds the amounts authorized by Section 6(b) for approval by a City Engineer ($45,000) or City Manager ($175,000). Since these limits are exceeded, City Council approval of the cost increase is required. The cost documentation has been reviewed by the City Engineer, or their official designee, and deemed complete as of April 22, 2024.

Table 2 below provides summary of how the City’s reimbursement obligations are impacted by these cost increases, and reflects the additional funding required to provide reimbursement for eligible public improvements.

Area 3
(Santa Fe Road)
Area 4
(Tank Farm Road)
Acacia Creek
Bike Path
Tank Farm Bike
Path PS&E TOTAL
Original Reimbursement
Agreement
(February 2022)
$424,251 $3,976,023 $376,006 $227,700 $5,003,980
Reimbursement Agreement
Amendment #1 (April 2024) $547,286 $7,872,264 $1,060,712 $342,392 $9,822,654 Change $123,035 $3,896,241 $684,706 $114,692 $4,818,675 % Change 29% 98% 182% 50% 96%
Reimbursable Costs by Project

Item 6g
Table 2: Reimbursable Costs by Fund Source
As a result of the substantial cost increases, staff is recommending the following actions:

1. Adopt a Resolution (Attachment A) approving Amendment #1 to the 600 Tank Farm Reimbursement Agreement (Attachment B), and

2. Approve appropriation of $267,138 in undesignated Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP) Transportation Impact Fee fund balance towards this reimbursement obligation.

As discussed further below in the Fiscal Impact section, it should be noted that the approval of the amended Reimbursement Agreement itself does not require the City to appropriate additional funding at this exact moment or guarantee that the additional funding needed will be available at a specific date in the future. It does, however, affirm City’s good faith intent to request appropriation of additional funds at the next budgetsetting opportunity (the 2025-27 Financial Plan) and pursue updates to the Citywide TIF program to reflect updated costs for the Tank Farm/Santa Fe Roundabout project. There is already an update to the Citywide TIF program in progress, with plans to present updated fees to the City Council for consideration in early 2025. Approving these recommended actions will allow the orderly and timely completion of high priority transportation improvements and production of additional housing, both of which are aligned with the City Council’s adopted Major City Goals.

Area 3
(Santa Fe Road)
Area 4
(Tank Farm Road)
Acacia Creek
Bike Path
Tank Farm Bike
Path PS&E TOTAL
General Fund $254,551 $1,560,657 $376,006 $68,310 $2,259,523 Citywide TIF $169,700 $2,415,366 $0 $159,390 $2,744,457 Total $424,251 $3,976,023 $376,006 $227,700 $5,003,980
General Fund $328,372 $2,361,679 $1,060,712 $102,718 $3,853,481 Citywide TIF $218,915 $5,483,121 $0 $0 $5,702,036
AASP TIF $0 $27,464 $0 $239,674 $267,138
Total $547,286 $7,872,264 $1,060,712 $342,392 $9,822,654 $3,853,481
$2,460,000
$1,393,481
$5,969,174
$267,138
$3,718,915
$1,983,121
$9,822,654
Citywide TIF Authorized (On-Site Credits & Off-Site Fees from Benefiting Properties) Additional Citywide TIF Funds Requiring 2025 Citywide TIF Update Total
Reimbursement Funds Available or Requiring Further Authorization General Fund
Already Appropriated
Additional Funds Requiring Future Budget Request
Transportation Impact Fees
Reimbursable Costs by Project
Original Reimbursement Agreement
Amendment #1 to Reimbursement Agreement
Existing AASP TIF Available

Item 6g

DISCUSSION
Background
On February 15, 2022, Covelop, Inc. (the “Developer”) obtained approval for a new mixed-use development project consisting of 280 residential units and up to 12,500 square feet of commercial uses within the Airport Area Specific Plan. The 11.7-acre project site is located at 600 Tank Farm Road.

As conditions of approval, the project is required to design and construct several transportation improvements envisioned in the City’s General Plan Circulation Element, Airport Area Specific Plan, and Active Transportation Plan. Several of these required improvements will be constructed in greater size and capacity than required by the project and are therefore eligible for reimbursement under the City’s Municipal Code. The improvements which have been identified as eligible for reimbursement include:

1. Santa Fe Road: Construction of a portion of the Santa Fe Road Extension north of Tank Farm Road (includes two travel lanes, landscaped parkway, northbound protected bike lane, southbound striped bike lane, and sidewalk on east side)

2. Tank Farm Road: Construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Tank Farm Road and Santa Fe Road.

3. Acacia Creek Bike Path: Construction of the Acacia Creek Bikeway, a shared-use bicycle/pedestrian path along the western bank of Acacia Creek, connecting the Damon Garcia Path network to Santa Fe and Tank Farm Roads.

4. Tank Farm Bike Path Project Specifications and Estimates (PS&E): Advanced planning and preparation of 65% designs and environmental technical studies to accelerate future construction of a shared-use pedestrian/bicycle path along Tank Farm Road connecting Santa Fe Road to Innovation Way.

The City and Developer executed a Reimbursement Agreement on February 18, 20221, authorizing reimbursement in the amount of up to $5,003,980 to the Developer for eligible costs related to design, permitting and construction of these improvements that exceed the development’s fair share costs. This reimbursement included a mix of approximately $2,259,523 from the General Fund and $2,744,457 from the Citywide TIF. These figures do not include additional costs for portions of these public improvements that are the sole responsibility of the developer and not eligible for public reimbursement, which includes the portions of Santa Fe Road and Tank Farm Road that are considered frontage improvements for the development, and a portion of the on-site Acacia Creek Bike Path.

Between 2022 and 2023, the City appropriated a total of $2,460,000 in General Funds towards the 600 Tank Farm reimbursement obligations—covering the full amount of reimbursement required from the General Fund per the original Reimbursement Agreement.

1 City Council Resolution 11305 (2022 Series) Approving a Reimbursement Agreement for 600 Tank Farm Road

Item 6g
The share of the reimbursements coming from the Citywide TIF fund source were to come from a mix of credits towards the 600 Tank Farm development’s on-site fees, and TIF fees paid by neighboring off-site development projects that also benefit from these infrastructure improvements. As of April 2024, there have been no eligible TIF fees paid by either the Developer or by Benefiting Properties.

See Table 1 and Table 2 above for a summary of the original costs, or Attachment B to Exhibit 4 of the February 18, 2022 Reimbursement Agreement for a detailed breakdown of reimbursable project costs and funding sources, as originally approved.

Amendment to Reimbursement Agreement
To address the necessary updates to the projected costs of the reimbursable improvements, Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement includes:

A. Updating and replacing several of the exhibits to reflect and document the new cost estimates, the new funding sources/amounts/limits, and providing an updated excerpt of the Citywide and AASP Transportation Impact Fee Program Project Lists.

B. Adds reference to AASP TIF Fund as a funding source.

C. Adds the City’s intent to allocate the AASP TIF undesignated balance of $267,138 prior to July 1, 2024.

D. Affirms the City’s intent to submit a budget request for an additional $1,393,481 in General Funds to be used towards this reimbursement obligation during or prior to the 2025-27 Financial Plan. Should the budget requests be declined; staff will request again at the next available budgeting opportunity until the additional General Fund appropriation has been approved.

E. Affirms the City’s intent to update the Citywide TIF program to reflect updated project costs in the amount of $1,983,121 for the Tank Farm/Santa Fe Roundabout project.

This is required to reimburse the developer for eligible costs. The TIF update is currently in progress and these updated costs will be incorporated into that new Impact Fee Study, which is estimated to be presented to City Council early in 2025.

F. Clarifies that since reimbursement requires amending the Citywide TIF program, the Developer’s fair share percent of the increased project cost coming from the TIF will need to be subtracted from the Developer’s eligible TIF reimbursement, as the Developer’s share of this increased cost would not be captured in the current fee schedule applied to the 600 Tank Farm development. This fair share increment is estimated at $33,421, as calculated by the City Transportation Division, and is not eligible for reimbursement.

It should be noted that Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement includes no costs or reimbursement funding for right-of-way acquisition. As noted above, due to the challenges and delays encountered during right-of-way negotiations, there is still much uncertainty regarding timing and cost with this acquisition. For this reason, no right-ofway costs are built into the updated agreement—staff expects to return to the Council for subsequent adjustments to this agreement at a future date when there is greater confidence on the anticipated costs for this component of the project.

Item 6g
Appropriation of the Airport Area Transportation Impact Fee Fund Due to the need for additional funding and the lack of eligible impact fees paid by developer and/or benefiting property owners to date, staff has identified the AASP TIF as an additional funding source for the reimbursement of certain projects. The AASP TIF was previously a subarea TIF fee that was ultimately collapsed into the Citywide TIF in 2018. The AASP TIF program collected costs towards Tank Farm Road corridor improvements, the Tank Farm/Santa Fe Roundabout, the Santa Fe Road Extension, and future pedestrian/bicycle paths along Tank Farm Road. City Council Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Reimbursement Agreement and adoption of the related Resolution allocates the existing uncommitted fund balance of $267,138 to the reimbursable project components (as of 4/24/2024), which is not eligible for use for any other City-led capital improvement projects currently in development. Per AB 1600 requirements, the City could risk the need to forfeit these funds if not used for eligible projects in a timely manner.

Inclusion of the AASP TIF as a funding source will provide immediate availability of funds to provide reimbursements for the Developer’s ongoing pre-construction activities on transportation infrastructure improvements, as well as reduce the amount of additional appropriation needed from the Citywide TIF Fund.

Appropriation of Additional General Fund
Per the original Reimbursement Agreement, the City has committed to providing a specific percentage of the reimbursable cost of each improvement from the General Fund, which represents the costs for these public improvements that cannot be legally collected via the TIF program. Since the cost of the improvements have increased, the City must plan to allocate sufficient General Funds in the future to satisfy the updated reimbursement obligation. The City has already allocated $2,460,000 in General Funds and would need to request additional $1,393,481 in General Funds at a future budgetsetting opportunity--during or prior to the 2025-27 Financial Plan.

Impact Fee Study to Update the Citywide TIF Program
The existing Citywide TIF program is collecting up to $3,500,000 from new development towards the Tank Farm/Santa Fe Roundabout project. For the City to increase the amount of TIF credits and/or reimbursements based on the updated costs, the City must complete a Impact Fee Study to update the Citywide TIF Program to update the project costs for the roundabout project. It is expected that roughly $1,983,121 in updated project costs will need to be added to the Citywide TIF Program to fully satisfy the reimbursement obligation to Developer. An Impact Fee Study is currently in progress which will update all the City’s Impact Fees, including the TIF programs. Staff is anticipating this Impact Fee Study will be completed and presented to Council in early 2025. Due to the uncertainty of the timing for the Impact Fee Study to be completed, and fact that the final Impact Fee Study and TIF rates may not allow for full collection of the additional $1,983,121 needed for this reimbursement, the amendment includes a provision that clarifies if the TIF Program update is not completed by July 1, 2025, then City Staff will meet with Developer to discuss and explore alternative funding sources which may be appropriately used towards the reimbursement obligations.

Item 6g
Previous Council or Advisory Body Action
The entitlement process for the 600 Tank Farm development project included review by the City’s Active Transportation Committee, Planning Commission, and ultimately the City Council. The following is a list of the specific Council Resolutions and Ordinances approved in conjunction with the entitlement process and original Reimbursement Agreement:

1. February 15, 2022, Resolution No 11304 – A Resolution Approving the 600 Tank Farm Development Project

2. February 15, 2022, Resolution No 11305 – A Resolution Approving a Reimbursement Agreement with Covelop, Inc.

3. February 18, 2022, Resolution No 11307 – A Resolution Approving Amendments to the Adopted 2021-22 Budget Appropriations

4. March 4, 2022, Ordinance 1708 – Approving a Rezone for Property at 600 Tank Farm Rd (PR-0005-2021, GENP-0814-2019, SPEC-0407-2020, EID-0608-2020) Public Engagement
Consistent with the City’s Public Engagement and Noticing (PEN) Manual and the City’s Municipal Code, the specific Council action requested in this staff report has a “notify” level of public engagement, which has been accomplished through public notification of this agenda item and associated staff report.

CONCURRENCE
The City’s Attorney, Community Development Department, Finance Department, Public Works Department, and Community Services Group have reviewed this staff report and concur with its recommendation.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed Amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement relates only to the financial mechanism by which the developer’s cost which exceeds their fair share will be reimbursed and does not cause change to the project or the environment and therefore no further environmental review is required. The 600 Tank Farm development and related infrastructure improvements were thoroughly evaluated in the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR; State Clearinghouse Number 2020110426) for the project and certified by Resolution No 11304 (2022 Series), on February 1, 2022

FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: No Budget Years: 2023-27
Funding Identified: Yes

Item 6g
Fiscal Analysis:

Funding
Sources
Total Budget
Available
Current
Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing
Cost
General Fund $2,139,255* $0** $2,139,255 N/A
State $0 $0 $0 N/A
Federal $0 $0 $0 N/A
Fees:

AASP TIF
(Fund 503)
$0 $267,138 $267,138 N/A
Fees:

Citywide-TIF
(Fund 507)
$0*** $0*** $0 N/A
Total $2,139,255 $267,138 $2,406,393 N/A
*Reflects $2,460,000 starting balance minus reimbursements already paid to date. **No funding request at this time; however, approval of Reimbursement Agreement Amendment affirms City’s intent to request at least $1,393,481 in additional general funds in the future, as part of 2025-27 Financial Plan.
***No existing Citywide TIF fund balance to be programmed to 600 Tank Farm Reimbursement Agreement. Per Agreement, reimbursement from TIF will be from not yet realized TIF revenues in the form of on-site fee credits from 600 Tank Farm and off-site TIF fees to be received from other benefiting private development, totaling a commitment of up to $5,702,036 future Citywide TIF revenues in total towards reimbursement.

As described above, the immediate fiscal impact associated with the proposed Reimbursement Agreement Amendment would involve appropriating $267,138 in undesignated fund balance from the AASP TIF fund towards this reimbursement.

Additional fiscal impacts would be realized in the future, as the agreement affirms the City’s intent to request appropriation of $1,393,481 in additional General Funds at the 2025-27 Financial Plan and prioritize up to $5,702,036 in yet-to-be realized Citywide TIF funds towards reimbursement to the Developer.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Council could decide not to approve the amendment to the 600 Tank Farm Reimbursement Agreement. This action is not recommended by staff because the reimbursement agreement is related to the delivery of a high-priority transportation improvement that is needed not only to accommodate development of the 600 Tank Farm development, but additional planned housing and non-residential development envisioned in the Margarita Area and Airport Area Specific Plans. The reimbursement agreement is a mutually beneficial agreement that allows the housing project to move forward without realizing significant carrying costs and uncertainty that would be the result if reimbursement for these additional costs was not available in the near term.

Item 6g
The infrastructure costs, if not appropriately reimbursed, would delay both the delivery of housing and important transportation infrastructure. This project is identified as a “Partnership Project” in the City’s Capital Improvement Plan and includes important public benefits. Pursuant to the Reimbursement Agreement Section 6(b), change orders greater than $175,000 require City Council Approval and Section 6(c) specifies that the City’s approval of a change order shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed, or conditioned.

2. Council could direct staff to modify the Amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement to approve only cost increases associated with Developer’s preconstruction activities, with staff to return for Council approval for a subsequent amendment to fund construction costs when there is more certainty regarding construction schedule for the Tank Farm/Santa Fe Roundabout. This action is not recommended by staff, as this identification of additional funding sources enables the Developer to advance the reimbursable improvements.

3. Council could decide to continue consideration of this item. The City Council may continue consideration of the recommendation if more information is needed to make a determination. Direction should be provided to staff regarding the additional analysis or data needed for the Council to conclude the item.

ATTACHMENTS
A - Draft Resolution adopting Amendment No. 1 to the 600 Tank Farm Reimbursement Agreement
B - Exhibit A to Resolution - Amendment No. 1 600 Tank Farm Reimbursement Agreement

R ______
RESOLUTION NO. _____ (2024 SERIES)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT #1 TO THE 600

TANK FARM REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, Covelop, Inc (Developer) is owner of the real property located at 600 Tank Farm Road; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved a residential mixed-use project at 600 Tank Farm Road, which is within the Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP), through a series of actions and approved entitlements as follows:

1. The Final Environmental Impact Report and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (including all mitigation measures therein) for the Project certified and adopted by Resolution No. 11304 (2022 Series), on February 1, 2022.

2. An amendment to the General Plan (Resolution No. 11304, 2022 Series), adopted on February 1, 2022, including amendments to the Land Use/ Circulation Element (“LUCE Update”) adopted by Resolution No 10586 (2014 Series), on December 14, 2014.

3. The AASP as amended by Ordinance No. 1708 (2022 Series), on March 1, 2022.

4. The City’s Zoning Ordinance as amended by Ordinance No. 1708 (2022 Series), on March 1, 2022.

5. The Vesting Tentative Map SBVD-0407-2021 approved on February 1, 2022.

WHEREAS, there are certain public improvements associated with the 600 Tank Farm Mixed-Use project that must be installed and are greater in size and capacity than required to serve only the project (“Excess Public Improvements”), qualifying said Excess Public Improvements for reimbursement as set forth in San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 16.20.110; and
WHEREAS, on February 1, 2022, the City Council approved Resolution No. 11305 (2022 Series), authorizing the Mayor to execute a Reimbursement Agreement for 600 Tank Farm; and
WHEREAS, on February 18, 2022, the Mayor executed a Reimbursement Agreement with the Developer which specifies (1) the portion of transportation improvements to be constructed by Developer and (2) the transportation improvements eligible for reimbursement; and
WHEREAS, since the execution of the Reimbursement Agreement, anticipated costs for transportation improvements to be constructed by developer have increased substantially. As a result of these increases, the Developer has requested a change order to update the reimbursable costs of required transportation improvements; and

Resolution No. _____ (2024 Series) Page 2
R ______
WHEREAS, the Developer has presented estimates of the costs to design, permit and construct said Excess Public Improvements, and fair share proportionality of the properties that may benefit from the installation of the Excess Public Improvements; and WHEREAS, the total amount of the requested change order exceeds the authority limit of the City Engineer ($45,000) and City Manager ($175,000) and therefore must be approved by City Council; and
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to resolve the increased costs by amending the Reimbursement Agreement to update the costs and eligible reimbursable amounts of the required transportation improvements and to include the increased cost into the calculation of the Citywide Transportation Impact Fee Program; and WHEREAS, the approval of an amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement will assist in the orderly and timely completion of public infrastructure.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. Amendment. The “Amendment No. 1 to Reimbursement Agreement for 600 Tank Farm Road”, attached as Exhibit A, is hereby approved, and the Community Development Director is authorized to approve minor revisions and execute this Agreement on behalf of the City.

SECTION 3. The Finance Director is authorized to administer and implement the Reimbursement Agreement as provided therein.

SECTION 4. The Mayor and City staff are authorized to take any actions necessary to carry out the intent of this Resolution.

Resolution No. _____ (2024 Series) Page 3
R ______
SECTION 5. Environmental Review. The 600 Tank Farm Mixed-Use Development Plan and associated Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) were approved and certified by the City Council on February 1, 2022. Installation of the public improvements contemplated under the Reimbursement Agreement were identified as required mitigation measures to address significant transportation impacts resulting from the development proposal. The Reimbursement Agreement relates only to the financial mechanism by which the developer’s costs in excess of fair share will be reimbursed and does not implicate any physical change to the project or the environment. Therefore, no further environmental review is required for this action.

Upon motion of Council Member ___________, seconded by Council Member ___________, and on the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

The foregoing resolution was adopted this _____ day of _______, 2024. ___________________________
Mayor Erica A. Stewart
ATTEST:
______________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________. ___________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk

1 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
FOR 600 TANK FARM ROAD
This Amendment No. 1 to Reimbursement Agreement for 600 Tank Farm Road (“Amendment No. 1”) is entered into on the ______ day of _____________, 2024, by and between the City of San Luis Obispo, a municipal corporation and charter city (“City”) and Covelop, Inc., a California corporation, or its successor(s)-in-interest, (the “Developer”), hereinafter referred to in this Amendment No.1 as “Party” and collectively as “Parties”, as appropriate.

RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, on February 18, 2022, the City and Developer executed a Reimbursement Agreement (the “Agreement”) for the 600 Tank Farm Road development (the “Development”), and
B. WHEREAS, as a condition of approval for the Development, Developer is required to build certain public improvements that are of greater size and capacity than required to serve only the project. The construction of excess public improvements qualifies Developer for reimbursement as set forth in San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Section 16.20.110; and
C. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agreement, the City will provide reimbursements to Developer for certain oversized transportation improvements eligible for reimbursement (“Infrastructure Improvements”), with reimbursement provided from a mix of fund sources, including City General Fund, Citywide Transportation Impact Fees (TIF) collected from other off-site Benefiting Properties, and credits towards Developer’s on-site Citywide TIF obligation for the 600 Tank Farm Road Project; and
D. WHEREAS, the anticipated costs to design, permit and construct the Infrastructure Improvements have increased above the estimates initially provided by the Developer and included the Agreement due to ongoing escalation of construction costs, and added complexity related to environmental permitting and right-of-way acquisition. As a result of these circumstances, Developer has submitted change orders totaling $4,818,675 to increase the total project costs eligible for reimbursement from $5,003,980 to $9,822,654, a 96% increase overall (See Exhibit A and B to this Amendment for details); and
E. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 6(a), 6(b) and 6(c) of the Agreement, any increase or decrease in cost must be reflected in the Contractor bid or change order submitted by Developer and approved by the City. Developer has submitted change orders totaling $4,818,675, which exceed the amounts authorized by

2 Section 6(b) of the Agreement for City Engineer ($45,000), and City Manager ($175,000) approval, and are therefore requiring City Council approval. Cost documentation submitted by Developer, which has been reviewed by City Engineer (or their designee) and deemed complete as of April 22, 2024.

F. WHEREAS, the cost for reimbursement-eligible Infrastructure Improvements exceeds the General Fund amounts previously appropriated by the City, and amounts that can be legally collected in the current Citywide TIF program for the Tank Farm/Santa Fe Roundabout project. Availability of funding needed to satisfy full reimbursement to the Developer will depend on approval of additional General Fund appropriations and forthcoming amendments to the Citywide TIF program to increase costs collected from new development for the Tank Farm/Santa Fe Roundabout project.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals, which are hereby incorporated into the provisions of this Amendment by this reference, and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

1. Effective Date of Amendment. This Amendment No. 1 shall become effective upon the date that the resolution approving this Amendment No. 1 becomes effective.

2. Amendment. The City and Developer hereby amend the February 18, 2022, Agreement as follows:

A. Exhibit A to this Addendum replaces Attachment A to Exhibit 4 (Developer Cost Estimate).

B. Exhibit B to this Addendum replaces Attachment B to Exhibit 4 (Estimated Cost and Funding Sources).

C. Exhibit C from this Addendum replaces Exhibit 2 (TIF Program Project List).

D. Section 2(i) is amended to add Section 2(i)(vi) as follows:
(vi) Existing uncommitted Airport Area Specific Plan (AASP) TIF fund funds, not to exceed the amounts programmed in the AASP TIF towards eligible Infrastructure Improvements.

E. Section 3(a) is replaced with the following:
(a) To budget and appropriate the necessary Eligible Fees to provide reimbursements, including, but not limited to timely appropriation of General Fund amounts, and reservation of any Citywide TIF fees paid by

3 Benefitting Properties. To this end, the City has already appropriated $2,460,000 in General Funds ($1,545,000 at the 2021-22 Mid-Year Budget; $715,000 at the 2021-23 Financial Plan; $200,000 at the 2023- 25 Financial Plan), and the City Manager presently intends to request that the City Council, subject to the City Council’s plenary discretion in the exercise of its budgeting authority and availability of funding, appropriate $267,138 in existing uncommitted AASP TIF funds prior to July 1, 2024, and request appropriation of an additional $1,393,481 in General Funds during or prior to the 2025-27 Financial Plan.

F. Section 3 is amended to add Section 3(h) as follows:
(h) To complete and present to the City Council for consideration a Impact Fee Study compliant with AB 1600 to update the Citywide TIF program to reflect updated project costs for the Tank Farm/Santa Fe Roundabout project (currently included in Citywide TIF Project #14, per Exhibit 2). It is assumed that an additional $1,983,121 will need to be collected for the roundabout project in the Citywide TIF to reimburse the Developer for eligible costs. The Citywide TIF program update is currently in progress and planned to be presented to the City Council for consideration in early 2025. If the Citywide TIF program has not been updated to capture increased costs related to the Tank Farm/Santa Fe Roundabout by July 1, 2025, City Staff will meet with Developer to discuss and explore alternative funding sources which may be appropriately used towards the reimbursement obligation.

G. Section 5 is amended to add Section 5(f) as follows:
(f) Where reimbursement to Developer requires amending an existing TIF program to increase costs collected in the TIF for eligible Infrastructure Improvements, the fair share percent of the increased project cost attributable to the 600 Tank Farm development will be subtracted from the Developer’s eligible reimbursement. It is understood that the Citywide TIF program will need to be amended to increase fees collected to cover the increased cost of the Tank Farm/Orcutt Roundabout project by approximately $1,983,121. Because the 600 Tank Farm development is vested under a Citywide TIF rate schedule that does not include this additional cost, the fair share portion of this cost attributed to the 600 Tank Farm development will be subtracted from the reimbursement to Developer coming from the Citywide TIF fund source. This fair share amount is calculated at approximately 1.69% of the $1,983,121 project cost increase ($33,421) based on the traffic growth projections and trip generation rates published in the City’s 2019 Citywide TIF Update Impact Fee Study.

4 3. Remainder of Agreement Unchanged. Except as specifically stated herein, the February 18, 2022 Agreement remains in full force and effect.

4. Counterparts. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

5. Authority. The parties hereby represent that the persons executing this Amendment are expressly authorized to do so for and on behalf of the parties.

6. Exhibits. The following exhibits are incorporated into this Amendment for reference.

A. Exhibit A – Attachment A to Exhibit 4, as Amended (Updated Developer Cost Estimates)
B. Exhibit B – Attachment B to Exhibit 4, as Amended (Updated Estimated Cost and Funding Sources)
C. Exhibit C – Exhibit 2, as Amended (TIF Project List) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the first date above.

DEVELOPER:

Covelop, Inc.

By: _______________________________
Pat Arnold, President
By: _______________________________
Damien Mavis, Secretary
CITY:

City of San Luis Obispo, a California Charter City and Municipal Corporation By: ________________________________
Timothea Tway, Community Development Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL EFFECT:

By: _________________________________
J. Christine Dietrick, City Attorney

5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California }
County of San Luis Obispo }
On _____________ , before me, _______________________________, Notary Public, Date Name and Title of the Officer
personally appeared
Name of Signer(s)
,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is (are) subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she /they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/ signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature _____________________________
Signature of Notary Public Place Notary Seal Above
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

EXHIBIT A
Attachment A to Exhibit 4 (Developer Cost Estimate), as Amended

EXHIBIT B
Attachment B to Exhibit 4 (Estimated Cost and Funding Sources), as Amended Uses
Santa Fe Road
(Area 3)
Tank Farm Road
(Area 4)
Acacia Creek
Bike Path
Tank Farm Bike
Path PSE Total
Design $ 30,306.93 $ 262,682.72 $ 36,024.83 $ 189,750.00 $ 518,764.48 Rights of Way $ 37,375.00 $ 525,500.00 $ - $ - $ 562,875.00 Direct Expense $ 316,159.86 $ 2,837,596.79 $ 475,468.73 $ - $ 3,629,225.38 Contingency $ 40,409.24 $ 350,243.63 $ 62,049.67 $ 37,950.00 $ 490,652.54 Total $ 424,251.03 $ 3,976,023.14 $ 573,543.23 $ 227,700.00 $ 5,201,517.40 Reimbursement Sources Santa Fe Road
(Area 3)
Tank Farm Road
(Area 4)
Acacia Creek
Bike Path
Tank Farm Bike
Path PSE Total
General Fund $ 254,550.61 $ 1,560,656.94 $ 376,005.65 $ 68,310.00 $ 2,259,523.20 Offsite Paid TIF (benefiting properties) $ 120,555.17 $ 1,715,876.15 $ - $ 159,390.00 $ 1,995,821.32 Direct Project Contribution $ - $ - $ 197,537.58 $ - $ 197,537.58 Onsite TIF (credits) $ 49,145.24 $ 699,490.05 $ - $ - $ 748,635.29 Total $ 424,251.02 $ 3,976,023.14 $ 573,543.23 $ 227,700.00 $ 5,201,517.39 Total Eligible for Public Reimbursement $ 424,251.02 $ 3,976,023.14 $ 376,005.65 $ 227,700.00 $ 5,003,979.81 Uses
Santa Fe Road
(Area 3)1
Tank Farm Road
(Area 4)2
Acacia Creek
Bike Path3
Tank Farm Bike
Path PSE4 Total
Design $ 78,071.72 $ 448,912.38 $ 15,000.00 $ 342,391.80 $ 884,375.90 Rights of Way $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Construction Costs $ 145,223.40 $ 4,951,060.65 $ 824,013.20 $ - $ 5,920,297.25 Soft Costs5 $ 302,207.76 $ 1,729,632.11 $ 98,096.81 $ - $ 2,129,936.68 Construction Contingency $ 21,783.51 $ 742,659.10 $ 123,601.98 $ - $ 888,044.59 Total $ 547,286.39 $ 7,872,264.24 $ 1,060,711.99 $ 342,391.80 $ 9,822,654.42 Reimbursement Sources
Santa Fe Road
(Area 3)1
Tank Farm Road
(Area 4)2
Acacia Creek
Bike Path3
Tank Farm Bike
Path PSE4 Total
General Fund $ 328,371.83 $ 2,361,679.27 $ 1,060,711.99 $ 102,717.54 $ 3,853,480.64 Citywide TIF
(On-Site Credits and Off-Site Fees from Others) $ 218,914.56 $ 5,483,121.13 $ - $ - $ 5,702,035.68 Airport Area TIF (Existing Fund Balance) $ - $27,463.84 $ - $ 239,674.26 $ 267,138.10 Total Eligible for Public Reimbursement $ 547,286.39 $ 7,872,264.24 $ 1,060,711.99 $ 342,391.80 $ 9,822,654.42 Cost Increase ($) $ 123,035.37 $ 3,896,241.10 $ 684,706.34 $ 114,691.80 $ 4,818,674.61 Cost Increase (%) 29% 98% 182% 50% 96%
Direct Developer Contribution6 $ 306,573.00 $ - $ 5,309,848.96 3 Excludes developer share of costs ($306,573), which is equivalent to construction off on-site sidewalk in lieu of wider Class I path. 6 Direct Developer Contribution includes share of improvement costs not eligible for public reimbursement, including 600 Tank Farm frontage improvements along the Santa Fe Extension, within the Tank Farm/Santa Fe Roundabout, and the equivalent cost for a standard sidewalk along the Acacia Creek.
4 30% from GF; 70% from Citywide TIF
Amended -- Attachment B to Exhibit 4
Estimated Costs and Funding Sources
1 60% of cost from GF; 40% from Citywide TIF
$5,003,275.96
5 Soft costs include expenses related to permitting, soils testing/monitoring, construction management and admin., bonding, etc. 2 Costs split 30% GF and 70% Citywide TIF. No right-of-way costs included in this agreement per Amendment #1. No more than $3,500,000 may be reimbursed from Citywide TIF for Tank Farm/Santa Fe Roundabout until Citywide TIF program is amended to update cost this project. If TIF is amended to increase cost collected for this project, the fair share of this cost increase (1.7% of increase) will be subtracted from the reimbursement to 600 Tank Farm Developer from the TIF fund source. This adjustment is not included in the values presented in this table. Original Cost Allocations Updated Cost Allocations Page 648 of 924

EXHIBIT C
Exhibit 2: Adopted TIF Project Lists
Citywide TIF (Adopted 7/2/2019)

Airport Area Specific Plan TIF (Adopted 8/23/2005)

Item 6h
Department: Fire
Cost Center: 8503
For Agenda of: 5/21/2024
Placement: Consent
Estimated Time: N/A
FROM: Todd Tuggle, Fire Chief
Prepared By: Nicole Vert, Business Analyst
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZE THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO APPLY FOR FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FISCAL YEAR 2023 FIRE

PREVENTION AND SAFETY GRANT

RECOMMENDATION

1. Authorize the Fire Department to apply for funding under the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Fire Prevention and Safety (FP&S) Program in the amount of $16,280.00 to purchase 6 Powered Air-Purifying Respirators; and

2. Authorize the City Manager, or their designee, to execute the grant documents and approve the budget changes necessary to appropriate the grant amount upon notification that the grant has been awarded, a resolution is not required.

POLICY CONTEXT
The recommended actions are consistent with the City of San Luis Obispo’s Financial Management Manual, Section 740 - Grant Management Policy. The policy states that Council will approve all grant applications in excess of $5,000 and delegate receipt and contract execution to the City Manager.

DISCUSSION
State, federal, and non-profit grants are occasionally offered to assist local governments with the financial impacts associated with daily operations and/or mandated programs.

The Fire Department actively seeks out these opportunities to enhance the effectiveness of the Department while increasing fiscal sustainability for the City. A recent grant opportunity was identified, which is in line with these goals and addresses a current need for the City: the FEMA Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 FP&S Program. The FY 2023 grant applications open in March 2024.

The Federal FP&S Grants are one of three grant programs within the Assistance to Firefighters Grants (AFG) that focus on enhancing the safety of the public and firefighters with respect to fire and fire-related hazards. The AFG Program accomplishes this goal by providing direct financial assistance to eligible fire departments for critical training and equipment.

Item 6h
Among the five basic homeland security missions noted in the Department of Homeland Security’s Quadrennial Homeland Security Review, the FP&S Program supports the goal to Strengthen National Preparedness and Resilience. For federal FY 2023, Congress appropriated $36,000,000 in funding for FP&S and is projecting to award grants to 100 applicants.

The objectives of the AFG program are to provide critically needed resources that equip and train emergency personnel to recognized standards, enhance operational efficiencies, foster interoperability, and support community resilience.

Staff recommends seeking $16,280.00 to purchase six Powered Air-Purifying Respirators, allowing the six investigators on the Prevention division of the San Luis Obispo Fire Department to each have a device ready for immediate use.

The Fire Investigators enter a post burn area when the toxic gas levels have reduced below dangerous levels. However, some gases still exist as well as particles capable of inhalation that, with repeated exposure, have been proven to be carcinogenic. A Powered Air-Purifying Respirator (PAPR) is a portable battery powered respirator that filters air in the user’s immediate environment, directing the clean, filtered air to the users face via a breathing tube. With the air being pushed into the user’s breathe zone by a fan, positive pressure is created inside the user’s mask preventing any unfiltered ambient air entering.

The PAPR devices will protect the Fire Investigators from harmful gases at all levels and minute particles while completing investigations in a burn zone.

Previous Council or Advisory Body Action
On August 15, 2023, the City Council authorized the fire department to apply for an AFG Program to send two firefighters to paramedic school and authorized the City Manager, or designee, to execute the grant documents and approve the budget changes necessary upon notification that the grant had been awarded.

On March 15, 2022, the City Council authorized the fire department to apply for an AFG Program to purchase Urban Search & Rescue equipment and authorized the City Manager, or designee, to execute the grant documents and approve the budget changes necessary upon notification that the grant had been awarded.

Public Engagement
This item is on the agenda for the May 21, 2024, City Council meeting and will follow all required postings and notifications. The public will have an opportunity to comment on this item at or before the meeting.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act does not apply to the recommended action in this report, because the action does not constitute a “Project” under CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15378. If the work associated with the grant funding requires environmental review, staff will not proceed with the project until a review has been completed.

Item 6h

FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: No Budget Year: 2024-25
Funding Identified: Yes
Fiscal Analysis:

Funding
Sources
Total Budget
Available
Current
Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing
Cost
General Fund $ $814.00 $ $
State
Federal $16,280.00
Fees
Other:

Total $16,280.00 $814.00 $
If the Fire Department were to receive funding from the FP&S Program, the City would have to match the Federal grant funds equal to 5%. The total package requested is $17,094.00 and if fully funded would result in $16,280.00 grant funding from FEMA and require a match from the city of $814.00. The Fire Department will absorb this match requirement within the existing operating budget for FY 2024-25.

ALTERNATIVES
The Council could decide not to pursue the grant monies. This is not recommended as fire service grant opportunities are limited and the grant funds would only serve to enhance the City’s safety and resilience while increasing fiscal sustainability for the City.

City of San Lu is Obispo, Council Memorandu m
City of San Luis Obispo
Council Agenda Correspondence
DATE: May 21, 2024
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Matt Horn, Public Works Director
VIA: Whitney McDonald, Interim City Manager
SUBJECT: ITEM 6I – AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE THE ROADWAY SEALING 2024 PROJECT, SPEC NO. 2000615
Staff received a question regarding the Roadway Sealing 2024 project, Item 6i on the May 21, 2024 City Council meeting agenda. The question is below with staff’s response shown in italics:

1. Please provide more information on areas of the project that include protected bike lanes with concrete curb separation, including specific locations and how they relate to implementation of the City’s Active Transportation Plan?
While protected bike lanes are proposed along portions of Grand Avenue as part of the project, no concrete curbs are proposed. The project plans attached with the staff report had an earlier detail that required a concrete curb to protect the bike lane on sheet D2. Where the plans include protected bike lanes, only mountable vertical features are proposed, such as flexible delineators (flex posts) and rubber “armadillo” bumps. Example photos of these materials are shown below. In addition, the detail shown on plan sheet D2 has been corrected and is attached to this correspondence for reference along with the Grand Avenue plan sheets.

Example of Existing Mountable Protected Bikeway Separation on Marsh Street ATTACHMENT:

A - Roadway Sealing 2024 Detail and Grand Avenue sheets

CASE 1

SOLID GREEN BIKE LANE
CASE 2

DASHED GREEN BIKE LANE EXTENSION

APPROACHING INTERSECTION RIGHT

TURN CONFLICT AREAS
CASE 3

DASHED GREEN BIKE LANE EXTENSION

THROUGH INTERSECTIONS AND ACROSS

DRIVEWAYS

GREEN BIKE LANE MARKINGS SHALL BE SEALMASTER

SAFE RIDE OR APPROVED EQUIVALENTSEE GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR

ADDITIONAL REFERENCE
A NOT TO SCALE CA MUTCD CHAPTER 9, FIGURE 9C-2

NOT TO SCALE

BIKE BUFFER - SOLID C

NOT TO SCALE
MODIFIED CITY STD 7360 D

NOT TO SCALE
STRIPED BULBOUT PER 2023 FEDERAL MUTCD FIGURE 3J-6B E

NOT TO SCALE
MODIFIED DETAIL 22 G
AREA = 45.5 SQFT

WHITE MARKINGS
NOTE: (1) GREEN WAY STENCIL

FURNISHED BY CITY
SIGN VARIES PER STREET, 8" GRID

CITY WILL PROVIDE

GRAPHIC FILES

NOT TO SCALE

GREENWAY SYMBOL I

NOT TO SCALE

GREENWAY SIGN H

NOT TO SCALE

GREENBACK SHARROW F

NOT TO SCALE
ZICLA ZEBRA 9 B NOT TO SCALE

TRAFFIC CIRCLE SIGN K

NOT TO SCALE
MODIFIED R10-15 SIGN L
3' 9'
6" YELLOW STRIPE DIMENSIONS PER PLAN
6" WHITE PAINT
12" WHITE PAINT10' O.C.

WHITE SHARROW

GREEN BIKE LANE COATING

PER SPECIAL PROVISIONS

DIRECTION OF TRAVEL

EDGE OF PAVEMENT
10'
5'
9'3"
(4) OM1-3 ON SINGLE POST.

ONE SIGN FACING EACH

DIRECTION
21"
48"
26"26"
16"
16"
3'3" 4'

6.5"

30.5"
TRAVEL

PARKING
45°'
12'

WIDTH PER PLAN
6" WHITE PAINT

WHITE BIKE LANE SYMBOL WITH PERSON

AND BIKE ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD
6" WHITE STRIPE

GREEN BIKE LANE

PAVEMENT COATING
6" WHITE STRIPE

GREEN BIKE LANE

PAVEMENT COATING
6" WHITE STRIPE

GREEN BIKE LANE

PAVEMENT COATING

TYPE D TWO-WAY YELLOW

RETROREFLECTIVE MARKER

YELLOW BOTS DOTS, TYPE AY MARKER PER
2015 CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20A
6" YELLOW
3" OFFSET
4'
24'

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
1 73
2000608
DATE
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

NTS

DETAILS
D
30"
30"
AREA = 11.5 SQFT

WHITE MARKINGS
8" GRID

NOT TO SCALE

TURN SHARROW J

NOT TO SCALE

CENTER MEDIAN CROSS SECTION A
36" WHITE PEXCO POST
DETAIL 39
45° 8' O.C.

STREETSIDEWALK
20' RED CURB
LENGTH

PER PLAN

STOP BAR

LENGTHPER PLAN

NOT TO SCALE

DAYLIGHTING BUFFER B
STAMPED CONCRETE NOTES:

1. 6" THICK STAMPED CONCRETE, COLORED
DAVIS COLORS SAN DIEGO BUFF (#5237)
(OR APPROVED EQUAL).

2. RIVER ROCK PATTERN.

3. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER
RECOMMENDATIONS.

NOT TO SCALE

STAMPED CONCRETE DETAIL D
7'

WIDTH PER PLAN

ZICLA ZEBRA CYCLE TRACK LANE SEPARATORS
SIZE: ZEBRA9, COLOR: WHITE

BIKE BUFFER

PER DETAIL C
PEXCO CITY POST MODEL EAC, 36" WHITE
WITH 2 LIGHT GREY WRAP
NOTE: FLEX POSTS & ZICLA ZEBRAS MUST BE MOUNTED TO ROADWAY PERMANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS 7'
28' (TYP)
NOTE: FLEX POSTS & ZICLA ZEBRAS MUST BE MOUNTED TO ROADWAY PERMANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS

NOT TO SCALE

CENTER MEDIAN REFUGE CONFIGURATION F

NOT TO SCALE

FLEX POST & ZICLA ZEBRA CONFIGURATIONS E

ZICLA ZEBRA SEPARATORS
SIZE: ZEBRA9, COLOR: YELLOW
PEXCO CITY POST MODEL EAC, 36" YELLOW
WITH 2 YELLOW WRAPS
DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPE WITH REFLECTORS (DETAIL 29)

DIMENSIONS AND RADIUS PER PLAN SHEETS

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
2 73
2000608
DATE
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

NTS

DETAILS
D
DETAIL 39
INSTALLATION NOTES:MEDIAN WORK SHALL CONFORM TO TO THE PROVISIONS IN SECTION 73, OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.

TYPE A3 CURB PER CALTRANS 2015 RSP A87A, DOWELLED IN TO EXISTING PAVEMENT SURFACE.

CLASS 3 CONCRETE. EXPANSION JOINTS AND WEAKENED PLANE JOINTS PER CITY STD 4110.
#4 REBAR AT 4'-0" OC, 12" MIN. LENGTH, DRIVEN IN PLACE#4 LONGITUDINAL BAR

STAMP CONCRETE PER STAMPED CONCRETE DETAIL D

PROTECT AC FROM CONCRETE STAINING OR SPILLS

PER PLAN
6"
#4 REBAR AT 4'-0" OC, 12" MIN

LENGTH, DRIVEN IN PLACE
#4 LONGITUDINAL BAR
4 5
6" CONCRETE (CLASS 3)

PAVEMENT
3 2 3
6 2
4 1234567

NOT TO SCALE

SPEED CUSHION DETAIL C

CENTER OF
AA
12" WHITE12" OFFSET

SECTION B-B
LAYOUT
42"

6.5'
12'
CL

TRAVEL LANE

EDGE OF TRAVEL WAY /CURB FACEPARKING LANEEDGE OF TRAVEL WAY /PARKING LANECURB FACE 21"
1 SPEED CUSHION NOTES:

1. SECTION A-A TO MATCH TYPE 1 ROAD
BUMP PER CITY STANDARD DETAIL 7320.

2. EXCEPTIONS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE
CITY ENGINEER.

BB

1.0'
TAPER

1.0'
TAPER

CROSS SLOPE OF NEW SPEEDCUSHION TO MATCH ROAD

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET G02
DETAIL 39A, 16 LF
DETAIL 82, 204 LF
RED CURB 50 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1, 17 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1, 17 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C,
SHEET D1, 27 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1 52 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
17 LF

TYPE VII ARROW
27 SQFT, Typ.

YELLOW HI-VIS CROSSWALK 44 LF
DETAIL 24, 204 LF
BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C, SHEET D1, 30 LF
(5) ZICLA ZEBRA PER DETAIL B, SHEET D1
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
257 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
116 LF
DETAIL 22, 122 LF
12" WHITE 69 LF
(12) 36" YELLOW FLEX POSTS
12" WHITE 40 LF
RED CURB 6 LF
YELLOW HI-VIS CROSSWALK 86 LF
N

PROTECT IN PLACE
(E) DECORATIVE

CROSSWALK
REFUGE PERDETAIL F, SHEET D2

SHARROW

11.5 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 39A
28 LF
BIKE ARROW 3.5 SQFT
BIKE RIDER 7 SQFT
12" WHITE 10 LF
REMOVE (E) SIGN POLE AND (E) SIGNS. REINSTALL (E) R1-1, (E) R1-3P, AND (N) STREET NAME SIGNS SIGNS ON (N) 12' PUNCH POST IN SAME LOCATION REMOVE (E) SR4-1(CA) AND INSTALL (N) W4-2 & R26(CA)
DETAIL 9
55 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL
E, SHEET D2, 202 LF
R8'
INSTALL R4-1 SIGN ON
(N) 12' PUNCH POST

INSTALL
SR4-1(CA) ON
(E) PUNCH
POST
INSTALL R4-1
SIGN ON (N) 12'

PUNCH POST
INSTALL (N) STREET NAME SIGNS ON (E) PUNCH POST.

INSTALL R10-15(MOD) SIGN PER DETAIL L,
SHEET D1 ON (N) PUNCH POST
BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL E, SHEET D2, 102 LF
(9) ZICLA AND (3) FLEX POSTS
1'
10' 10' 3' 8'

9.5' 8' 13.5'
1'

REFUGE PER
DETAIL F, SHEET D2

31.5'

28.5'
R9'
R10.5'
5' 6'
10' 5.5' 8'

5.5' 8'
RED CURB 29.5 LF
RED CURB 64 LF

TYPE VI ARROW
40 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 38
50 LF
1 2 SIZE "STOP" LEGEND 11 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 38A 17 LF
1 2 SIZE TYPE IV ARROW 7.5 SQFT
INSTALL W9-1
SIGN ON (N) 12'

PUNCH POST
11' 11' 4' 8'
3'
10' 5' 8'
3'
8'
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1, 20 LF

CONTINUE BIKE BUFFER TO CROSSWALK
1" = 30'
0 30 60 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
01 73
2000615
DATE
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
SCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

NOTESREMOVE CONFLICTING (E) STRIPING

FOR ANY CONFLICT WITH BASE BID STRIPING,
ADD. ALT. A STRIPING PREVAILS
G
BID ALT. A. GRAND

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET G03
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET G01 HI-VIS CROSSWALK 81 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1, 17 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1, 17 LF
DETAIL 22
95 LF
DETAIL 27B
32 LF
10' O.C.

INSTALL RRFB SYSTEM WITH W11-2
and W16-7P SIGNS BACK TO BACK
REMOVE (E) SR4-1, INSTALL RRFB
SYSTEM WITH W11-2 and W16-7P SIGNS

BACK TO BACK ON LUMINAIRE POLE

INSTALL RRFB SYSTEM WITH
W11-2 and W16-7P SIGNS

RELOCATE BUS STOP SIGN

TO NEXT BLOCK SOUTH
INSTALL R1-5 SIGN ON
(N) 12' PUNCH POST
INSTALL W11-2 and W16-9P
SIGNS ON (N) 12' PUNCH POST
INSTALL R6-1(R) SIGN
ON (N) 12' PUNCH POST
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
42 LF
CASE 3 BIKE

LANE PERDETAIL D,
SHEET D152 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1 52 LF
(2) WHITE FLEX POSTS
AND (3) ZICLA ZEBRA PER
DETAIL B, SHEET D2
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1, 57 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1 56 LF
(2) WHITE FLEX
POSTS AND (3)

ZICLA ZEBRA PER
DETAIL B, SHEET D2
N
YIELD LINE 6Δ
RED CURB 17 LF
DETAIL 24
332 LF
DETAIL 24
331 LF
DETAIL 22, 34 LF
(4) 36" YELLOW

FLEX POSTS BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C,
SHEET D1, 72 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C,
SHEET D1, 115 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL E, SHEET D2
181 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
207 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL E, SHEET D2
135 LF
R8'
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1, 30 LF
INSTALL R3-5(R)

SIGN ON (E)

PUNCH POST
RED CURB 13 LF
INSTALL SR4-1(CA)
SIGN ON (N) 12'

PUNCH POST
8' 10.5' 10' 3'
8' 11'

2.5'
10' 10'
1'

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
294 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
27 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
42 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
116 LF
1'
10'

2.5'

INSTALL
R2-1(35) SIGN

ON (E) PUNCH
POST

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
37 LF
(3) WHITE FLEX POSTS
(2) ZICLA ZEBRA PER DETAIL B, SHEET D1
REFUGE
PER

DETAIL F,
SHEET D2
3' 10' 5' 8' 3' 8.5'
3'
1" = 30'
0 30 60

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
02 73
2000615
DATE
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
SCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

NOTESREMOVE CONFLICTING (E) STRIPING

FOR ANY CONFLICT WITH BASE BID STRIPING,
ADD. ALT. A STRIPING PREVAILS
G
BID ALT. A. GRAND

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET G04
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET G02
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
CASE 1 BIKE LANE SHEET D1, 17 LF

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1, 50 LF
RED CURB 141 LF

RELOCATED BUS

STOP SIGN
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1 57 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL
D, SHEET D1 54 LF
(2) WHITE FLEX POSTS AND (3)

ZICLA ZEBRA PER DETAIL B,
SHEET D2
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
88 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1 52 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1 56 LF
(2) WHITE FLEX POSTS AND
(3) ZICLA ZEBRA PER DETAIL B, SHEET D2
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
88 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
52 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
74 LF
N
RED CURB 41 LF
DETAIL 22
23 LF
DETAIL 24
260 LF DETAIL 24, 260 LF
DETAIL 22
12 LF

RED CURB
56 LF
RED CURB 104 LF

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

YIELD LINE
15 Δ
DETAIL 22, 107 LFDETAIL 27B, 54 LF
(4) 36" YELLOW

FLEX POSTS

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL E, SHEET D2
13 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
30 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
115 LF

9.5' 8' 10'

1.5'
8' 11' 10'
1' 2.5'
10'

7.5'
3'
8' 5' 10' 3'

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL E, SHEET D2
105 LF
BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL E, SHEET D2, 108 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
152 LF
1'
10'
2'
15' 8' 12'
DETAIL 29, 27 LF
12" YELLOW 9 LF
(3) 36" YELLOW FLEX POSTS
(2) ZICLA ZEBRA PER
DETAIL B, SHEET D1
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1 57 LF
1" = 30'
0 30 60

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
03 73
2000615
DATE
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
SCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

NOTESREMOVE CONFLICTING (E) STRIPING

FOR ANY CONFLICT WITH BASE BID STRIPING,
ADD. ALT. A STRIPING PREVAILS
G
BID ALT. A. GRAND

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET G03
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET G05
HI-VIS CROSSWALK 48 LF

ADJUST SPACING SUCH THAT

SPACES BETWEEN MARKING MUST

BE PLACED IN WHEEL TRACKS
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1, 23 LF
INSTALL R3-5(R) SIGN ON
(E) PUNCH POST
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1 57 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1 62 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1 37 LF
N
DETAIL 24, 268 LF DETAIL 24, 271 LF
DETAIL 22, 72 LF
(3) 36" YELLOW FLEX POSTS(2) ZICLA ZEBRAS PER
DETAIL B, SHEET D1
DETAIL 24
DETAIL 24 192 LF
188 LF

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

RED CURB 37 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL E, SHEET D2
276 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL
C, SHEET D1, 96 LF
(2) ZICLA ZEBRA PER
DETAIL B, SHEET D1
(1) 36" WHITE FLEX POST

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
162 LF
"ONLY" LEGEND
22 SQFT
3'
DETAIL 38
45 LF
10'
6' 12'
TYPE I 10' ARROW
14 SQFT

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C,
SHEET D1 85 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
100 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1, 42 LF
12" WHITE 73 LF
(4) 36" WHITE

FLEX POSTS
12" WHITE 29 LF
(1) 36" WHITE

FLEX POST

8.5' 12.5' 11.5' 8'
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL E, SHEET D2
285 LF
INSTALL R3-7R ON
(N) 12' PUNCH POST
INSTALL R4-4 ON
(N) 12' PUNCH POST
1'
10' 10' 14' 8'
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
243 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
65 LF
10'

9.5'
2'
10' 5' 8' 3' 8'
1'
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1 51 LF
(2) WHITE FLEX POSTS AND
(3) ZICLA ZEBRA PER DETAIL
B, SHEET D2
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1, 20 LF
1" = 30'
0 30 60 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
04 73
2000615
DATE
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
SCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

NOTESREMOVE CONFLICTING (E) STRIPING

FOR ANY CONFLICT WITH BASE BID STRIPING,
ADD. ALT. A STRIPING PREVAILS
G
BID ALT. A. GRAND

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET G06
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET G04
HI-VIS CROSSWALK 25 LF

ADJUST SPACING SUCH

THAT SPACES BETWEEN

MARKING MUST BE PLACED

IN WHEEL TRACKS
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1, 17 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1 77 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
CASE 3 BIKE LANE DETAIL D, SHEET D1 100 LF PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1 47 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1 42 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
53 LF
DETAIL 22
22 LF
DETAIL 24
120 LF DETAIL 24, 117 LF
RED CURB 99 LF

PROTECT

IN PLACE

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

HI-VIS CROSSWALK 30 LF
12" WHITE
33 LF
DETAIL 38, 39 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
64 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
32 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
60 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
148 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
RED CURB 123 LF 256 LF
14' 10'
3'
11' 9' 14' 8'
3'

7.5' 3' 8' 3'
3'
10' 10' 10'

2.5'
3' 8' 3' 8'

RED CURB
30 LF
3'
11' 11'
2'
9'
8'
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1, 100 LF

10.5' 8' 2' 12' 10' 7'
12" WHITE 30 LF
TYPE I 10' ARROW
14 SQFT
DETAIL 29, 23 LF
12" YELLOW 9 LF
(3) 36" YELLOW FLEX POSTS(2) ZICLA ZEBRA PER
DETAIL B, SHEET D1
1" = 30'
0 30 60 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
05 73
2000615
DATE
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
SCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

NOTESREMOVE CONFLICTING (E) STRIPING

FOR ANY CONFLICT WITH BASE BID STRIPING,
ADD. ALT. A STRIPING PREVAILS
G
BID ALT. A. GRAND

USE CAUTION WHEN REMOVING (E) STRIPING

TO PROTECT IN PLACE (E) TRAFFIC SIGNAL

LOOP DETECTORS

SEE MATCHLINE SHEET G07
SEE MATCHLINE SHEET G05
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1, 17 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1, 17 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1, 17 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
67 LF
N

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.
(4) 36"
WHITE

FLEXPOSTS
DETAIL 24
398 LF
DETAIL 24
405 LF
DETAIL 29
83 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
444 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
457 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
294 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
349 LF
10'

2.5' 10'
3'
8'
3'
8'
8'
3'
8'
3'
10'
3'
4'
10'
3'
8'
3'
8'
RED CURB 4 LF
RED CURB 4 LF

RED CURB
16 LF
RED CURB 3 LF
RED CURB 3 LF
RED CURB 3 LF
RED CURB 5 LF
RED CURB 5 LF
(2) YELLOW FLEX POSTS
INSTALL OM2-1V SIGN ON (N) 12'

PUNCH POST ON MEDIAN NOSE
(3) 36"
WHITE
FLEX
POSTS
10 3'
4'
10'
3'
8'
3'
8'
1" = 30'
0 30 60 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
06 73
2000615
DATE
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
SCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

NOTESREMOVE CONFLICTING (E) STRIPING

FOR ANY CONFLICT WITH BASE BID STRIPING,
ADD. ALT. A STRIPING PREVAILS
G
BID ALT. A. GRAND

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET G08
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET G06

RED CURB
58 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1, 17 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
124 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
37 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1 160 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
52 LF
N
DETAIL 22
115 LF

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

RED CURB
20 LF
RED CURB 25 LF
DETAIL 22
43 LF
DETAIL 27B
16 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
105 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
63 LF
8' 13' 10'

3.5'

11.5' 8' 11'

30.5'
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
30 LF
8' 3' 8' 3' 10' 3' 4' 10' 3' 8' 3' 8'
1" = 30'
0 30 60 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
07 73
2000615
DATE
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
SCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

NOTESREMOVE CONFLICTING (E) STRIPING

FOR ANY CONFLICT WITH BASE BID STRIPING,
ADD. ALT. A STRIPING PREVAILS
G
BID ALT. A. GRAND

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET G07
SEE MATCHLINE SHEET S29

REMOVE (E) STRIPING
12" WHITE, 11 LF
DETAIL 22, 10 LF
12" WHITE 16 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1 64 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1, 17 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1 40 LF
N

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

HI-VIS CROSSWALK 49 LF
DETAIL 38
61 LF
12" WHITE 11 LF
12" WHITE 22 LF
12" WHITE 14 LF
12" WHITE
21 LF
12" WHITE12 LF
DETAIL 38
56 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
63 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
87 LF

GREENBACK

SHARROW

11.5 SQFT, Typ.

TYPE VII ARROW
27 SQFT

RED CURB
DETAIL 24 63 LF
209 LF

RED CURB
47 LF
DETAIL 24
209 LF
DETAIL 29
59 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
103 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
60 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
233 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
239 LF
REMOVE (E) STRIPINGDETAIL 22, 10 LFDETAIL 27B, 45 LF

2.5'
10' 3' 8' 3' 8'
8' 22'
12' 11.5'
INSTALL R61-5(CA)

SIGN ON (E)

LUMINAIRE POLE
INSTALL R61-5(CA)
SIGN ON (N) 12'

PUNCH POST
INSTALL R81(CA) AND
R81A(CA) SIGNS ON
(N) PUNCH POST
2'
10' 3' 8'
3'
8'
2'
2'
9'
TRUNCATED DOMES PER CITY STD 4440 & CALTRANS STDA88

BUFFER PER DETAIL E,
SHEET D1 29 LF
R5'
HI-VIS

CROSSWALK
33 LF
HI-VIS

CROSSWALK
45 LF
DETAIL 22, 14 LF
(3) WHITE FLEX POSTS(2) ZICLA ZEBRA PER
DETAIL B, SHEET D1
1" = 30'
0 30 60 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
08 73
2000615
DATE
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
SCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

NOTESREMOVE CONFLICTING (E) STRIPING

FOR ANY CONFLICT WITH BASE BID STRIPING,
ADD. ALT. A STRIPING PREVAILS
*
BID ALT. A. GRAND

USE CAUTION WHEN REMOVING (E) STRIPING

TO PROTECT IN PLACE (E) TRAFFIC SIGNAL

LOOP DETECTORS

Item 6i
Department: Public Works
Cost Center: 5006
For Agenda of: 5/21/2024
Placement: Consent
Estimated Time: N/A
FROM: Matt Horn, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Nathan Garcia Nava, Engineer I
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE ROADWAY SEALING 2024 PROJECT, SPECIFICATION NO. 2000615

RECOMMENDATION

1. Approve the project plans and special provisions for the Roadway Sealing 2024, Specification Number 2000615; and

2. Authorize staff to advertise for bids; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to award the construction contract pursuant to Section

3.24.190 of the Municipal Code for the bid total, if the lowest responsible bid is within the publicly disclosed funding amount of $5,400,000; and

4. Approve the transfer of $5,131,008 from the Streets Reconstruction and Resurfacing account (2001001) to the project account (2000615); and

5. Approve the transfer of $130,000 from the Parking Lots Maintenance account (2000031-08.01) to the project account (2000615); and

6. Approve the transfer of $40,000 from the Parking Lots Maintenance account (2000031-08.04) to the project account (2000615); and

7. Approve the transfer of $50,000 from the Parking Lots Maintenance account (2000031-08.05) to the project account (2000615); and

8. Approve the transfer of $130,775 from the Pedestrian and Bicycle Pathway account (2000032-00) to the project account (2000615); and

9. Approve the transfer of $200,000 from the Active Transportation Plan Implementation account (200608) to the project account (2000615); and

10.Appropriate $1,060,000 in LRM funds pending approval of the 2024-2025 Supplemental Budget CIP True-up to the project account (2000615); and

11.Authorize the City Engineer to approve Contract Change Orders up to available project budget and up to any amended budget subsequently approved by the City Manager up to $200,000.

REPORT -IN-BRIEF
Following the City of San Luis Obispo's (City) Pavement Management Plan (PMP), staff recommends advertisement of a slurry sealing project to provide maintenance and striping improvements to the streets shown in Attachment A. Also included in this bid package are maintenance and striping plans for the Johnson Park Parking Lot, Mitchell Park Parking Lot, Damon Garcia Park Parking Lot, and the Railroad Safety Trail along California Blvd.

Item 6i
Pavement maintenance projects often involve complete removal and replacement of roadway striping and pavement markings, which provides excellent opportunities to incorporate planned safety and complete street improvements as part of these larger roadway maintenance efforts. The Roadway Sealing 2024 project (Project) will implement several street modifications from the recently adopted Active Transportation Plan to improve safety and mobility for all road users. These strategies include design elements intended to improve pedestrian crossing safety, increase separation between bicyclists and motor vehicle traffic, and measures to calm traffic and reduce speeds on certain streets.

This Project will be funded in Fiscal Year 2024-25. Allocated funds per the recommendations of this staff report are estimated to be sufficient for this project. The Project will be advertised during the summer and construction is slated to begin in the early fall

POLICY CONTEXT
On May 17, 2022, Council approved a Purchasing Policy Update to the Financial Management Manual that required Council approval for Public Projects that cost over $200,000.

Implementation of the project aligns directly with several City plans, policies and goals, including the application of various elements identified in the City’s Active Transportation Plan aimed at promoting walking and cycling infrastructure, as well as safety improvements identified in the City’s Traffic Safety Report, such as modifications to the Grand Avenue/Loomis intersection. Additionally, the project contributes to the City's major goals of Climate Action, Open Space, and Sustainable Transportation. The project also supports the ongoing maintenance of City streets as outlined in the Pavement Management Plan, ensuring safe and efficient mobility for residents while reducing the environmental impact of transportation systems.

DISCUSSION
Background
The Roadway Sealing 2024 (Project) is part of the Pavement Management Plan (PMP) that is an ongoing effort to provide ongoing and routine maintenance of City roadways for increased roadway life. The City’s PMP, adopted in 1998, established nine pavement maintenance zones within the City, and a plan in which each of these areas received maintenance on an eight-year rotation. In 2009, City Council approved a modified PMP that provided priority for arterial streets while maintaining the eight-year rotation for maintenance work on local streets. The City implements this rotation by performing maintenance in two neighborhood Pavement Areas in one year, and then focusing on arterial street work in the second year, thereby alternating between neighborhood areas and arterials biennially to maintain the current 143 miles of roadways in the City.

Item 6i
Roadway Sealing 2024
The Project will focus on sealing local streets in pavement management areas 8 and 1.

Apart from those pavement areas, the Project also includes pavement maintenance and striping on Johnson Avenue, Broad Street, and several parking lots, including the Damon Garcia Parking lot, Johnson Park Parking lot, and Mitchell Park Parking lot. The Project is structured with a Base Bid and one Additive Alternative A to maximize the scope of work within available funding. The Project’s base bid includes street sealing in Area 8 and 1, Johnson Avenue improvements and the sealing of the three parking lots included in the Project. The Project’s Additive Alternative A includes work on Grand Avenue, as described further below.

The strategy is to award the contract with the Base Bid and Additive Alternative A as funding will allow, up to the Publicly Disclosed Funding amount of $5,400,000 in compliance with Public Contract Code Section 20103.8(c). If the lowest responsive total bid is in excess of the Publicly Disclosed Funding Amount but the base bid is within the funding amount, then the base bid will be recommended for award without the additive alternative. If the total bid is in excess of the Publicly Disclosed Funding Amount, another option would be to return to Council to award both the Base Bid and Bid Alternative with an additional funding request.

Active Transportation Elements
In developing the Project plans (Attachment B) and special provisions (Attachment C), staff identified several improvements recommended in the City’s Active Transportation Plan (ATP) and Traffic Safety Report (TSR) that could be included in the Project, as funding resources allow. These active transportation and safety improvements are discussed in further detail below.
 Grand Avenue
Complete street improvements are proposed for Grand Avenue to improve active transportation facilities and safety for all road users as a pilot program that will be made permanent at a future time. These improvements are part of a Tier 2 1project identified in the ATP. The most prominent modification proposed for Grand Avenue is a five-lane to three-lane road diet between Monterey Street and just south of Slack Street. A road diet, which includes the narrowing or removal of auto lanes along a roadway where excess width or capacity exists, is a U.S. Department of Transportation proven safety countermeasure and consistently demonstrates effectiveness in reducing illegal speeding, crash frequency, and crash severity. The City has implemented several successful road diets on other streets, such as South Street and Laurel Lane, where traffic demand did not require the excess lane capacity that was previously provided. Similar to what was implemented on Johnson Avenue in 2023, improvements will be installed on Grand Avenue as a quick-build pilot project, with paint striping and temporary materials only (i.e., flex posts, rubber bumps, and traffic paint). No permanent thermoplastic striping, slurry seal, or concrete work are included.

1 A tier Two Project is identified as a

Item 6i
In addition to the road diet, other active transportation and safety elements proposed for Grand Avenue include:

1. Installation of protected bike lanes where on-street parking does not currently exist using quick-build materials, such as flex posts and Zicla Zebras (rubber lane separators). This is generally limited to southbound Grand between Slack Street and US 101 where no on-street parking exists.

2. Addition of striped buffers on both sides of bike lanes where on-street parking exists.

3. Installation of bike lane crossing enhancements at intersections, including green conflict markings, additional warning signage, and setback corners where feasible.

4. Restriction of turning maneuvers (westbound through and left-turn) at the Grand Avenue/Loomis Street intersection to address ongoing broadside collision trends identified in the Traffic Safety Report.

5. Installation of an enhanced pedestrian/bicycle crossing at McCollum Street with high-visibility crosswalks and Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) to improve crossing opportunities and access to existing SLO Transit stops.

Figure 1 below shows the proposed cross-section of Grand Avenue between Slack Street & the US 101 Ramps, facing northbound.

Figure 1: Grand Avenue Cross Section between Slack Street & US 101 Ramps Initial plans for Grand included (a) extending the road diet on southbound Grand Avenue through the Slack Street intersection, reducing the number of southbound through lanes exiting the Cal Poly Campus from two to one; (b) installing concrete curb-protected protected bicycle lanes where on-street parking does not currently exist and concrete median islands at several intersections; and (c) installing a slurry seal and thermoplastic striping on Grand Avenue.

Item 6i
During project development, the City received comments from Cal Poly expressing concerns about access to and from campus during special events. Traffic analysis prepared for Cal Poly’s campus wide circulation study indicated that a roundabout or new signal installation is required to alleviate congestion with the initial plans. However, these major intersection improvements are outside the scope of the Pavement Management Plan. Through collaboration with Cal Poly and review of the traffic analysis, the project design was refined slightly to retain two southbound lanes exiting Cal Poly, which quickly narrow to one lane south of Slack Street. The configuration of the northbound lanes remains as originally proposed, which includes one travel lane, which widens to two travel lanes just south of the Slack Street intersection to retain capacity entering the Cal Poly campus.

Further, the improvements will be implemented as a pilot project temporary quick-build materials only. This approach will advance safety improvements in the short-term while providing additional opportunity to monitor effectiveness, refine design details, and explore sufficient funding to complete the ultimate improvements in a more permanent way in the future. At the earliest, permanent improvements on Grand Avenue could be included as part of the 2026 or 2027 pavement management projects, if funded by subsequent Financial Plans.

While the ATP ultimately plans for protected bicycle lanes on both sides of Grand Avenue, this would require removing all on-street parking to provide adequate lines-of-sight at intersections/driveways and to maintain width needed for fire access. Full removal of onstreet parking would require significant public outreach, consideration for commercial deliveries/loading, and analysis of potential parking spillover.  Johnson Avenue
Repaving Johnson Avenue between San Luis Drive and Laurel Lane was initially part of the 2023 Arterials Paving project. However, this segment was deferred (a) due to a conflicting utility project north of Bishop Street, and (b) to allow more time to monitor the effectiveness of the Johnson Avenue Road Diet Pilot Project installed summer 2023 between Bishop Street and Laurel Lane. Johnson Avenue north of Bishop Street remains deferred for pavement maintenance until the planned utility project is complete. Johnson Avenue between Bishop Street and Orcutt Road is now proposed for resealing as part of this year’s pavement project.

The Johnson Avenue Road Diet Pilot Project included reducing the number of lanes from two in each direction (four total) to one in each direction plus a new center turn lane (three total lanes). The Pilot Project identified goals of (a) reducing driving speeds, and (b) increasing comfort and safety for all travelers. After installing the Pilot Project in 2023, prevailing speeds have decreased from 43 miles per hour (mph) to 37 mph, and less than 1% of vehicles are traveling 10 mph or more above the 35 mph speed limit (93% reduction with road diet). Two traffic collisions (one with minor injuries) were reported within the road diet limits in the four months since installation, compared to 13 collisions in the previous five years (6 injuries; 3 severe injuries). Following a successful pilot installation, the road diet between Bishop Street and Laurel Lane is proposed to be made permanent with thermoplastic pavement markings.

Item 6i
In addition to a permanent road diet, additional active transportation elements proposed for Johnson Avenue include:

1. Installation of a permanent concrete median refuge at the Sydney Street school crossing on both sides across the Johnson intersection.

2. Installation of traffic calming measures to reduce turning speeds, shorten pedestrian crossing exposure, and improve pedestrian visibility.  Project Limits – All Streets
All streets within the Roadway Sealing 2024 project limits will incorporate elements such as the addition of high visibility “ladder style” crosswalks at all existing and proposed new marked pedestrian crosswalks, and crosswalk daylighting at as many intersections as practicable, particularly at intersections near schools, along arterial and collector streets, and areas with high pedestrian activity.
 Pavement Area 1 (East City Neighborhoods)
The project will include several features identified in the ATP within Pavement Area 1:

1. Toro Street Neighborhood Greenway (ATP Tier 2 Project): Greenway pavement legends, guide signage, and traffic calming measures will be installed along Toro Street between Phillips Lane and Pacific Street to encourage a lowstress, comfortable environment for those walking and biking. The existing enhanced crossing at Toro Street/Marsh Street will be modified to allow bicyclists to activate the Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) system without the need to dismount. A quick-build traffic circle will also be constructed at Toro Street/Mill Street to promote slow vehicular speeds.

2. Mill Street Neighborhood Greenway (ATP Tier 3 Project): Greenway pavement legends, guide signage, and speed cushions will be installed along Mill Street between Pepper Street and Grand Avenue to encourage a low-stress, comfortable environment for those walking and biking. A second portion of the Mill Street Neighborhood Greenway between Chorro Street and Pepper Street is identified in the ATP as a Tier 1 Project. This section was originally included in the Project but was deferred due to a conflicting sewer line replacement project planned for 2025.

The ATP identifies installing an on-street, two-way protected bikeway on the east side of Pepper Street parallel to the railroad tracks between Mill Street and Marsh Street as a Tier 1 project. The ATP identifies a goal to complete all Tier 1 projects by 2030 because these projects are most likely to encourage walking and biking. However, staff recommends deferring this project on Pepper Street from the Roadway Sealing 2024 project because (a) streetlighting is limited and should be improved before or along with the two-way bikeway; and (b) the segment between Mill and Palm Streets is narrower than the rest of the route, requiring either roadway widening or parking removal on both sides of the street to provide a two-way bikeway.

Item 6i
Public input during and after the January 2024 Community Meeting revealed a desire for traffic calming in the neighborhood north of San Luis Obispo High School, generally including San Luis Drive, Andrews Street, Cazadero Street, and Corralitos Avenue. While there was insufficient time and resources to conduct the necessary focused outreach and planning for more substantive traffic calming measures in this neighborhood, such as traffic circles or speed humps, the plans include several measures requested by community members, such as addition of stop signs (where warranted), striped corner extensions (“bulbouts”) to slow speeds and reduce pedestrian crossing distances, and high-visibility bike route markings.
 Pavement Area 7 (Northwest of Downtown)
Resurfacing sections of Broad Street, Chorro Street, and Murray Avenue was initially part of the 2022 Roadway Sealing project. However, these facilities were deferred due to conflicts with construction of a new sewer main and the North Chorro Neighborhood Greenway. The Roadway Sealing 2024 project includes installing a new northbound bicycle lane on Chorro Street between Mission Street and Meinecke Avenue. The ATP identifies this as a Tier 2 project.
 Pavement Area 8 (University Neighborhoods)
The ATP has identified one project within Pavement Area 8 that will be implemented as part of the Roadway Sealing 2024 project. Along Highland Drive, the project will install an eastbound bike lane on a short stretch just west of Ferrini Road where the roadway climbs a steep grade. The ATP identifies this as a Tier 2 project.

Neighborhood Traffic Management Requests
Various Neighborhood Traffic Management (NTM) requests have been received from residents for streets included in the Project at the following locations:

1. Highland Drive between Patricia Drive and Santa Rosa Street

2. Patricia Drive between Twin Ridge Drive and Highland Drive

3. Jeffrey Drive between Highland Drive and Westmont Avenue

4. Rancho Drive between Westmont Avenue and Rancho Drive cul-de-sac

5. Westmont Avenue between Patricia Drive and Jeffrey Drive

6. Broad Street between Mission and Lincoln Streets
City staff collected speed and traffic volume data on these neighborhood streets to evaluate if traffic calming measures are warranted based the Circulation Element’s adopted volume/speed thresholds. For Highland Drive, Patricia Drive, Jeffery Drive, Westmont Avenue, and Broad Street that met volume/speed thresholds2, staff mailed out ballots to adjacent properties to inform residents and gauge support for proposed measures. Typical elements included with NTM projects include speed humps, speed

2 Volume/speed thresholds are set based on street classification as identified in the City's Circulation Element. For Local Residential Streets, traffic calming is warranted when daily traffic volume over 1,800 vehicles and/or prevailing speed is more than 27.5 miles per hour. For Residential Collectors, traffic calming is warranted when daily traffic volume is over 3,600 vehicles and/or prevailing speed is more than 27.5 miles per hour. Based on 2024 traffic data, all streets except Rancho Drive met traffic calming warrants based on prevailing speeds. Rancho Drive had neither excessive prevailing speeds or excessive traffic volumes and was removed from the NTM queue.

Item 6i
tables, traffic circles, and traffic diverters. Staff did not receive a sufficient number of responses or clear majority support from neighboring residents/property owners to justify installation of traffic calming elements as part of the paving project at this time. The current NTM Guidelines require a response rate of 51% and support rate of 67% to proceed with traffic calming and staff was unable to meet those requirements. All streets with NTM requests where adopted volume/speed thresholds were met (i.e. all streets but Rancho Drive) will remain in the NTM queue for further consideration and community input at a future date. The City is currently able to address one to two NTM requests per year and has a queue of approximately 15 requests.

Table 1 below shows the speed and traffic volume data collected along with the results of the NTM ballots.

Table 1: Neighborhood Traffic Management Data & Ballot Results Street
85th
Percentile
Speed* (MPH)
Traffic
Volume*
(vehicles)
Ballots
Sent
Ballots
Received
Ballots in
Favor of
NTM
Highland
Drive 32 N/A 236 9 5
Patricia
Drive 30 N/A 116 9 4
Jeffrey
Drive 30 938 41 2 1
Rancho
Drive 26 370 Does not meet warrants for traffic calming Westmont
Avenue 29 522 68 11 6
Broad
Street 31 N/A 97 8 5
*Note: Underlined values meet adopted thresholds, and italicized values do not meet adopted thresholds.

Previous Council or Advisory Body Action
In June 2023 City Council adopted the 2023-25 Financial plan that included the approval of the project along with allocating funds during the 2024-25 Fiscal Year.

The project was presented to the City’s Active Transportation Committee (ATC) three times during project development: in fall 2023 to provide input on preliminary scope of improvements; in February 2024 to review 90% design drawings; and again in April 2024 to provide final input on Grand Avenue designs. The ATC provided helpful input to guide design refinements, with the following primary themes:
 Explore opportunities to improve pedestrian/bicycle crossing comfort and safety at the Johnson/Southwood intersection.
 Retain a full road diet (one lane in each direction) on Grand Avenue between Slack and Monterey Streets and continue to coordinate with SLO Fire to explore opportunities for further street narrowing as feasible to further encourage safe speeds.

Item 6i
 Explore opportunities for centerline hardening (placing flexible objects along side-street centerlines) to encourage safer auto left-turning speeds.  Increase daylighting (restricting parking and adding flex posts) at intersection approaches to improve sight lines for pedestrians and bicycles.  Increase protected bike lane widths where possible to allow for safe passing and side-by-side riding.

Ultimately, staff was able to incorporate many of these suggestions into the final plans.

The remaining substantive recommendations from the ATC that are not reflected in the final plans are:
 The plans for Grand Avenue retain 20’ clear width between fixed objects along the full corridor, as requested by SLO Fire for efficient emergency response. Staff will continue to discuss with SLO Fire to explore opportunities to test “pinch points” along the route, where additional mountable features could be placed within the 20’ clear area to further narrow the roadway and reduce vehicle speeds.  The ATC recommended retaining one southbound lane on Grand exiting the Cal Poly campus, suggesting that Cal Poly invest in more substantial temporary traffic control strategies to manage egress traffic during their regular special events. Cal Poly expressed significant concern regarding this recommendation, as this would cause the intersection to fail operationally for the 40-50 regular special events scheduled throughout the year. The final plans retain two lanes exiting the campus, which quickly narrow to one lane south of Slack Street, but have added a wide protected bike lane exiting campus to reduce pedestrian crossing exposure and slow turning speeds.

Public Engagement
In addition to the multiple presentations to the ATC, public engagement was conducted through a community workshop at the City/County Library Community Room on January 11, 2024, and through a project website, which provided information on the project and community input opportunities throughout project development.

CONCURRENCE
This project has been reviewed and has concurrence from the Public Works Department, the Fire Department, and the Community Development Department.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Project qualifies for an Exemption to the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301(Existing Facilities) because the Project consists of the repair and maintenance of existing roadways, and minimally disruptive surface improvements within an existing built urban environment (pavement markings sign posts, etc.). A Notice of Exemption will be filed through the Community Development Department upon Council approval of the project.

Item 6i

FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: Yes Budget Year: 2024-25
Funding Identified: Yes
Fiscal Analysis:

Funding Sources Total Budget
Available
Current
Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing Cost
General Fund $3,908,000 $3,908,000 $0 N/A
State $0 $0 $0 N/A
Federal $0 $0 $0 N/A
Fees $0 $0 $0 N/A
Other: SB1 Fund: $1,092,000 $1,092,000 $0 N/A
Capital Outlay Fund
LRM – Damon
Garcia (2000031-

08.01)
$130,000 $130,000 $0 N/A
Capital Outlay Fund
LRM – Mitchell Park
(2000031-08.04)
$45,000 $45,000 $0 N/A
Capital Outlay Fund
LRM – Johnson
Park (2000031-

08.05)
$50,000 $50,000 $0 N/A
Capital Outlay Fund
LRM – Roadway
Safety Trail
(2000032)
$130,755 $130,755 $0 N/A
Capital Outlay Fund
LRM – Active
Transportation Plan
(2000608-03)
$200,000 $200,000 $0 N/A
Supplemental
Budget Allocation*:

Capital Outlay Fund
LRM
$0 $1,060,000 $0 N/A
Total $ 5,550,775 $1,060,000 $0 N/A
*FY 24-25 Supplemental Budget has yet to be approved. Project funding pending budget approval. See fiscal impact section.

Item 6i
Roadway
Sealing 2024
(2000615)
Active
Transportatio
n Plan
Implementatio
n (2000608-
03)
Parking Lot
Maintenance
(2000031-

08.01) Damon
Parking Lot
Maintenance
(2000031-

08.04)
Mitchell
Parking Lot
Maintenance
(2000031-

08.05)
Johnson
Railroad
Saftey Trail
(2000032)
Capital Outlay
Fund -
LRM/SB1
Capital
Outlay Fund -
LRM
Capital
Outlay Fund -
LRM
Capital
Outlay Fund -
LRM
Capital
Outlay Fund -
LRM
Capital
Outlay Fund -
LRM
Base Bid $4,741,000 $200,000 $86,000 $17,000 $23,000 $33,000 $5,100,000 Additive
Alternative A $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Contingency
(17%) $873,000 $0 $14,000 $3,000 $4,000 $6,000 $900,000 Total
Construction
Estimate
$5,914,000 $200,000 $100,000 $20,000 $27,000 $39,000 $6,300,000 Construction
Management: $160,225 $0 $30,000 $25,000 $23,000 $91,775 $330,000 Communication
Consultant $87,411 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $87,411
Material
Testing $27,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,500
Printing Plans $500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500
Total Project
Cost $6,191,008 $200,000 $130,000 $45,000 $50,000 $130,775 $6,746,783 Total Available
Account
Balance
$0 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $130,775 $140,775
Allocated
Funding FY 24-
25:
$5,131,008 $200,000 $130,000 $35,000 $50,000 $0 $5,546,008 Additional
Supplemental
Budget
Request
$1,060,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,060,000
Total Project
Balance $6,191,008 $200,000 $130,000 $45,000 $50,000 $130,775 $6,746,783 Post Project
Balance $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ----
Fiscal Impact Summary
Roadway Sealing 2024 Specification No. 2000615
Project Total
Costs
The Project will be awarded after July 1, 2024, when the funding allocation shown in the 2023-25 Financial Plan will be available to support the construction cost. The project is expected to receive $5,131,008 from the Street Reconstruction & Resurfacing project account (2001001-03). The $5,131,008 is split between two funding sources: Local Revenue Measure funding will provide $3,908,000 and SB1 will provide the remaining $1,223,008.

Staff created a new project account for tracking and accounting purposes which will incorporate all elements of the project funding. The Project has multiple funding sources in various project accounts that would lead to having to pull funds from various accounts.

Creating a new project account allows for the opportunity to transfer all the funding to a

Item 6i
single account. The new Project account is 2000615 and the funding allocated from the Street Reconstruction & Resurfacing account (2001001-03) will be transferred to the project account (2000615).

In addition to the funds expected from the Streets Reconstruction & Resurfacing account, there is also an additional allocation on July 1, 2024 of $200,000 to the Active Transportation Plan account (2000608-03) for elements from the ATP that have been included in the Project. Staff is recommending transferring the $200,000 to the project account.

Staff is recommending transferring funding from the Parking Lot Maintenance Account (2000031) to cover the cost of improvements made to the various parking lots included in the Project. The Damon Garcia Parking Lot project account (2000031-08.01) will be allocated $130,000 on July 1, 2024. The Mitchell Park Parking Lot improvements project account (2000031-8.04) has a current balance of $10,000 and will be allocated $35,000 on July 1, 2024. The Johnson Park Parking Lot project account (2000031-08.05) will be allocated $50,000 on July 1, 2024. Staff is recommending transferring all available budget out of these three tasks to support the Roadway Sealing 2024 project budget.

The cost for improvements made to the section of the Railroad Safety Trail included in the Project will be covered by the Pedestrian and Bicycle Pathway project account (2000032). Staff is recommending the current account balance of $130,755 be transferred to the Project account (2000615) for construction.

Upon allocation of the 2024-25 fiscal year budget, the Project will have an available balance of $5,550,775 from all funding sources to expend on construction. The estimated total project cost is $6,610,775. Therefore, an additional $1,060,000 is required to fund the total project cost.

Staff is currently in the process of finalizing the 2024-2025 Supplemental Budget, which is scheduled for presentation to City Council on June 4th, 2024. A preview of the recommendations included in the Supplemental Budget was presented to Council on May 7th. One of the recommendations is to allocate additional funding to the Roadway Sealing 2024 project as part of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) True-up process. This process considers projects with urgent funding requirements due to cost escalations and proposes allocating funding from projects not slated for construction before July 2025. By following this approach, staff can ensure that projects like the Roadway Sealing 2024 project receive sufficient funding for construction without tying up funds in accounts that will not be utilized during the current financial plan.

Staff is proposing an additional allocation of $1,060,000 from Local Revenue Measure funds to support both the base bid and bid alternative for Grand Avenue, contingent upon favorable bid outcomes. Should Council approve this recommendation, these additional funds would be available to the Project on July 1, 2024.

Item 6i
If Council does not approve the recommendation to allocate $1,060,000 in LRM funds to the project during the Supplemental Budget at the June 4th Council Meeting, it will necessitate a re-evaluation of the project's funding strategy. Alternatively, staff could refrain from awarding the bid alternative and only proceeding with the base bid if bids fall within the project budget. However, if bids do not align with the budget or if deemed necessary, the second option would be to reject all bids and seek an alternative funding source. This would require staff to return to Council for further direction and guidance on how to proceed effectively with the project.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Deny the approval to advertise the project. City Council could choose to deny the authorization to advertise this project. Staff does not recommend this alternative as the Project is part of the City Pavement Management Plan and maintenance needs to be completed on the City streets identified in the Project.

2. Award the Base Bid and proceed without awarding the Bid Alternate. City Council could choose to award the Base bid if it falls within project budget and procced without awarding the Bid alternate. Staff does not recommend this option as the Bid alternative contains ATP elements that have been reviewed and discussed with the public for approval.

ATTACHMENTS
A - 2000615 Roadway Sealing 2024 Vicinity Map
B - 2000615 Roadway Sealing 2024 Plans
C - 2000615 Roadway Sealing 2024 Special Provision

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Roadway Sealing 2024
Location Map
N

Reference Documents:

City Standard Specifications - August 2020 EditionCity Engineering Standards - August 2020 EditionCalTrans Standard Plans and Specifications - 2015 Edition index to plans
sheet no. description
san luis obispo county, california
ROADWAY SEALING 2024

APPROVED BY
SPECIFICATION NO. DATE SHEET
Brian A. Nelson, City Engineer R.C.E. C79870 Approved Date G:\Projects\ActiveProjects\Street Improvements\2000608 - Roadway Sealing 2024\450 Design Working Documents\454 CAD\454.2 Drawin 2000615 0$< T1 of  gs
0 1000 2000
N
T1 COVER PAGET2 LEGEND AND NOTES
D1-2 DETAILS
S01 PATRICIAS02 JEFFREY, DARTMOUTHS03 CASAS04 MURRAYS05 MONTALBAN, LEMONS06 OLIVES07 FOOTHILLS08 FOOTHILL, CRANDALL,

CARPENTER
S09 HATHWAYS10 HATHWAY, LONGVIEW
S11 SLACKS12 SLACK, HATHWAYS13 HATHWAY, STAFFORD,
TAFT
S14 BOND, FREDERICKSS15 FREDERICKS, KENTUCKYS16 FREDERICKS, HOPES17 HAYS, McCOLLUMS18 HOPE, LOOMISS19 LOOMISS20 LOOMIS, BUENA VISTA AREA 8
S21 ABBOT, WILSONS22 GARFIELDS23 GROVE, PHILLIPSS24 WALNUT, TOROS25 PEACHS26 PEACHS27 PALMS28 PALMS29 ANDREWS, SAN LUISS30 SAN LUIS DRIVE, ANDREWSS31 SAN LUIS DRIVE, ANDREWS S32 PEPPERS33 TORO, PACIFICS34 PEEPER, PALMS35 TOROS36 TORO, PACIFIC, PISMOS37 PISMO, BUCHONS38 BUCHON, TOROS39 ISLAY, LEFFS40 LIZZIES41 IRIS, WOODLANDS42 ELLA, FIXLINI AREA 1
S43-45 HIGHLANDS46 CHORROS47 MURRAYS48-49 BROADS50-51 MILLS52-57 JOHNSONS58 RAILROAD SAFETY TRAILS59 MITCHELL PARK PARKING LOTS60 JOHNSON PARK PARKING LOTS61 DAMON GARCIA PARKING LOT

OTHER LOCATIONS

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870

ADDITIVE ALTERNATE A
S62-69 GRAND - SLACK TO MONTEREY

1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THESE PLANS, SPECIAL PROVISIONS PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT AND THE 2020 CITY OFSAN LUIS OBISPO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND ENGINEERING STANDARDS,

IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD PLANS, 2015 EDITION (UNREVISED).

2. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR OR PERMITTEE TO CONTACT "UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF NORTHERN/CENTRALCALIFORNIA" BY PHONE AT 8-1-1 FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS PRIOR TO START OFCONSTRUCTION FOR LOCATION OF POWER, TELEPHONE, OIL AND NATURALGAS UNDERGROUND FACILITIES. CONTRACTOR OR PERMITTEE SHALL ALSOCONTACT THE APPROPRIATE AGENCY FOR THE LOCATION OF CABLE T.V., WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE OR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES.

3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL POSSESS A CLASS "A" OR "C12" LICENSE AT THE TIME THE BIDS OPEN AND DURING THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE CONTRACT.

4. THESE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ALL EXISTING FACILITIES IN THE VICINITY OF

THE PROPOSED WORK SUCH AS EXISTING IRRIGATION HEADS AND LINES, SHRUBBERY AND VEGETATION, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR MUST USE CARE TO

AVOID DAMAGE TO ANY EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS OR VEGETATION IN THE

VICINITY OF THE WORK, AND MUST REPAIR ANY FACILITIES DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER.

5. WHERE TRIMMING OF EXISTING VEGETATION IS REQUIRED DURING

CONSTRUCTION IT MUST BE DONE IN A MANNER TO REMOVE THE MINIMUM

POSSIBLE AMOUNT OF VEGETATION AND LEAVE THE REMAINING IN AN ATTRACTIVE CONDITION. CONTRACTOR MUST COORDINATE WITH CITYARBORIST PRIOR TO TRIMMING OF ANY VEGETATION.

6. THESE PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ALL OVERHEAD LINES. CONTRACTOR SHALL

TAKE CARE DURING CONSTRUCTION TO AVOID CONTACT WITH OR DAMAGE TO EXISTING OVERHEAD LINES.

7. ANY EXISTING UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS THAT BECOME DAMAGED DURING

CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE COMPLETELY RESTORED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AT THE CONTRACTOR'S SOLE EXPENSE.

8. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES AND AGENCIES WITH

SERVICES IN THE AREA PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES

AND COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES AFFECTED BY
CONSTRUCTION.

9. PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSED LAND

SURVEYOR SHALL FILE A CORNER RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE SAN LUISOBISPO COUNTY SURVEYOR FOR EACH EXISTING MONUMENT WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA THAT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO BE DISTURBED. PROTECT

BENCHMARKS AND PROPERTY CORNERS IN PLACE PER CITY STD SECTION 5-1.26.

10. PROTECT SURVEY MONUMENTS IN PLACE DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE

CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE REPLACEMENT OF DAMAGED OR DISPLACED SURVEY MONUMENTS AND SHALLNOTIFY THE CITY FIVE (5) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO RESTORING MONUMENTS.MONUMENTS SHALL BE RESET BY A CALIFORNIA LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR

AND SHALL INCLUDE PREPARING AND FILING A CORNER RECORD WITH SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY.

11. UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN HEREIN, ALL STRIPING AND MARKINGS SHALL BE PER CALTRANS REVISED STANDARD PLANS 2015 - A20A, A20B, A20C, A20D, A24A, A24B, A24C, A24D, AND A24E. ANY STRIPING NOT MARKED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS SECTION 84.

12. GREEN BIKE LANE MARKINGS SHALL BE SEALMASTER SAFE RIDE OR CITY APPROVED EQUIVALENT PER SECTION 84-6.01. INSTALLATION ON AC AND/OR CONCRETE SURFACE SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.

13. CROSSWALKS SHALL BE 10' WIDE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.14. THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING PLACE ON CONCRETE REQUIRES A PRIMER COAST PRIOR TO APPLICATION.

15. FLEX POST MUST BE PEXCO CITY POST MODEL EAC OR APPROVED EQUAL.

FLEX POST SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY ENGINEER PRIOR TOPROCUREMENT.

16. RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACONS (RRFB) EQUIPMENT SUBMITTALS

SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT

17. HYDRANT MARKERS MUST BE INSTALLED PER STD. 7920. DO NOT INSTALL IN

BIKE LANES
general notes: legend:

FIRE HYDRANTHYDRANT MARKERDRIVEWAY

SIGN POST

RRFB SYSTEM

STORM DRAIN PIPEGAS LINE

SLURRY SEAL

PROTECT IN PLACE UTILITY COVERS
STORM or SEWER MANHOLE (PER 6040)
WATER VALVE (PER 6040)
MONUMENT (PER 9020)

TRAFFIC BOX
COMMUNICATIONS (PER 9030)GAS COVER

TREE PROTECTION

1. PROTECT TREE BRANCHES, TRUNK, ROOTS AND FOLIAGE THROUGH PROPER

TRIMMING AND CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES WHENEVER POSSIBLE PER CITY STANDARD SECTION 20. CONTRACTOR TO HIRE CERTIFIED ARBORIST FOR TREE

TRIMMING TO ALLOW NECESSARY EQUIPMENT CLEARANCE AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE CITY. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 48 HRS IN ADVANCE OF THE WORK.

2. WHERE TREES CANNOT BE TRIMMED TO AVOID CONFLICT WITH CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT, THE FOLLOWING TECHNIQUES MAY BE UTILIZED TO MINIMIZEDAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES:
a. USE EQUIPMENT THAT IS SHORTER IN HEIGHT OR WIDTH TO AVOID CONTACT

WITH TREES
b. BACK EQUIPMENT UNDER LIMBS AND FOLIAGE TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
c. EMPLOY HAND TECHNIQUES TO AVOID USING EQUIPMENT UNDER VULNERABLE TREES
d. UNDER COORDINATION WITH THE CITY ARBORIST, PUSH INTERFERING TREE

LIMBS TEMPORARILY OUT OF THE WAY

LAYOUT APPROVAL

1. ALL STRIPING LAYOUTS, PLACEMENT OF VERTICAL ROADWAY ELEMENTS (I.E.

FLEX POSTS, MEDIANS, ETC.), PARKING STALL TEES AND CURB PAINTING LIMITS

SHALL BE MARKED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

2. NEW SIGN POSTS MUST BE INSTALLED PER ENG. STD. 7210 & 7215. ALL PUNCH POSTS IN DOWNTOWN CORE MUST BE POWDER COATED DARK GREEN PER ENG.

STD. 7210 & 7215.

3. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED HEREIN, ALL LANE WIDTH DIMENSIONS ARE

MEASURED FROM CENTER OF STRIPE TO FACE OF CURB (OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT WHERE NO CURB EXISTS AT OUTSIDE EDGE OF ROADWAY).

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
2 

2000615
DATE
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

NTS
NOTES
T
MAY 2024

CASE 1

SOLID GREEN BIKE LANE
CASE 2

DASHED GREEN BIKE LANE EXTENSION

APPROACHING INTERSECTION RIGHT

TURN CONFLICT AREAS
CASE 3

DASHED GREEN BIKE LANE EXTENSION

THROUGH INTERSECTIONS AND ACROSS

DRIVEWAYS

GREEN BIKE LANE MARKINGS SHALL BE SEALMASTER

SAFE RIDE OR APPROVED EQUIVALENTSEE GENERAL NOTES AND SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR

ADDITIONAL REFERENCE
A NOT TO SCALE CA MUTCD CHAPTER 9, FIGURE 9C-2

NOT TO SCALE

BIKE BUFFER - SOLID C

NOT TO SCALE
MODIFIED CITY STD 7360 D

NOT TO SCALE
STRIPED BULBOUT PER MUTCD FIGURE 3J-6B F

NOT TO SCALE
MODIFIED DETAIL 22 H
AREA = 45.5 SQFT

WHITE MARKINGS
NOTE: (1) GREEN WAY STENCILFURNISHED BY CITY
SIGN VARIES PER STREET, 8" GRID

CITY WILL PROVIDE

GRAPHIC FILES

NOT TO SCALE

GREENWAY SYMBOL J

NOT TO SCALE

GREENWAY SIGN I

NOT TO SCALE

GREENBACK SHARROW G

NOT TO SCALE
ZICLA ZEBRA 9 B NOT TO SCALE

TRAFFIC CIRCLE SIGN K

NOT TO SCALE

BIKE LANE ENDS SIGN L
BIKE
LANE
ENDS
3' 9'
6" YELLOW STRIPE DIMENSIONS PER PLAN
8" WHITE PAINT
12" WHITE PAINT10' O.C.

WHITE SHARROW

GREEN BIKE LANE COATING

PER SPECIAL PROVISIONS

DIRECTION OF TRAVEL

EDGE OF PAVEMENT
10'
5'
9'3"
(4) OM1-3 ON SINGLE POST.

ONE SIGN FACING EACH

DIRECTION
21"
48"
26"26"
16"
16"
3'3" 4'

6.5"

30.5"
TRAVEL

PARKING
45°'
12'

WIDTH PER PLAN
6" WHITE PAINT

WHITE BIKE LANE SYMBOL WITH PERSON

AND BIKE ARROW PER CALTRANS STANDARD
6" WHITE STRIPE

GREEN BIKE LANE

PAVEMENT COATING
6" WHITE STRIPE

GREEN BIKE LANE

PAVEMENT COATING
6" WHITE STRIPE

GREEN BIKE LANE

PAVEMENT COATING

TYPE D TWO-WAY YELLOW

RETROREFLECTIVE MARKER

YELLOW BOTS DOTS, TYPEAY MARKER PER
2015 CALTRANS STANDARD PLAN A20A
6" YELLOW6" OFFSET
4'
24'
6"
8"

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
1 

2000608
DATE
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

NTS

DETAILS
D
MAY 2024

INSTALLATION NOTES:

MEDIAN WORK SHALL CONFORM TO TO THE PROVISIONS IN SECTION 73, OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.

TYPE A3 CURB PER CALTRANS 2015 RSP A87A, DOWELLED IN TO EXISTING PAVEMENT SURFACE.

CLASS 3 CONCRETE. EXPANSION JOINTS AND WEAKENED PLANE JOINTS PER CITY STD 4110.
#4 REBAR AT 4'-0" OC, 12" MIN. LENGTH, DRIVEN IN PLACE#4 LONGITUDINAL BAR 1 2345

NOT TO SCALE
CONCRETE BIKE MEDIAN DETAIL (MODIFIED CITY STD. 4940) A AA

NOT TO SCALE

SPEED CUSHION B

CENTER OF TRAVEL LANE
AA
CL
12" WHITE PAINT12" OFFSET

SIDEWALK

GUTTER LIP

CURB FACE
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL 12" MIN GAP FOR DRAINAGE ON BIKE MEDIANS EVERY 25' OR WHERE UTILITY COLLARS CONFLICT WITH MEDIAN. LAYOUTS AND GAPS TO BE CONFIRMED IN FIELD BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION

PEXCO CITY POST MODEL EAC,
18” WHITE WITH 3 YELLOW WRAP

PEXCO CITY POST MODEL EAC,
18” WHITE WITH 3 YELLOW WRAP

PER PLAN
PER
PLAN
PER
PLAN
LAYOUT

SECTION A-A
LAYOUT

MEDIAN MEDIAN
10' 10'

DRIVEWAY
3'
.5' PAVEMENT
#4 LONGITUDINAL BAR
6" CLASS 3

CONCRETE
7 #4 REBAR AT 4'-0" OC,
12" MIN LENGTH,

DRIVEN IN PLACE
3 4
3 SECTION A-A
LAYOUT
3'

6.5'
12'
1'

6.5'
1' 3'
3"
36" WHITE PEXCO POST
DETAIL 39
45° 8' O.C.

STREETSIDEWALK
20' RED CURB
8'

STOP BAR

NOT TO SCALE

DAYLIGHTING BUFFER C
STAMPED CONCRETE NOTES:

1. 6" THICK STAMPED CONCRETE, COLORED
DAVIS COLORS SAN DIEGO BUFF (#5237)
(OR APPROVED EQUAL).

2. RIVER ROCK PATTERN.

3. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER
RECOMMENDATIONS.

NOT TO SCALE

STAMPED CONCRETE DETAIL D
7'

WIDTH PER PLAN

ZICLA ZEBRA CYCLE TRACK LANE SEPARATORS
SIZE: ZEBRA9, COLOR: WHITE

BIKE BUFFERPER DETAIL C
PEXCO CITY POST MODEL EAC, 36" WHITE
WITH 2 LIGHT GREY WRAP
NOTE: FLEX POSTS & ZICLA ZEBRAS MUST BE MOUNTED TO ROADWAY PERMANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS 7'
28' (TYP)
NOTE: FLEX POSTS & ZICLA ZEBRAS MUST BE MOUNTED TO ROADWAY PERMANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS

NOT TO SCALE

CENTER MEDIAN REFUGE CONFIGURATION F

NOT TO SCALE

FLEX POST & ZICLA ZEBRA CONFIGURATIONS E

ZICLA ZEBRA SEPARATORS
SIZE: ZEBRA9, COLOR: YELLOW
PEXCO CITY POST MODEL EAC, 36" YELLOW
WITH 2 YELLOW WRAPS
DOUBLE YELLOW STRIPE WITH REFLECTORS (DETAIL 22)

DIMENSIONS AND RADIUS PER PLAN SHEETS

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
2 

2000608
DATE
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

NTS

DETAILS
D
DETAIL 39
MAY 2024

12" WHITE
16 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
15 LF
N

RED CURB
76 LF
20 LF FROM E.O.C.

RED CURB
76 LF
20 LF FROM E.O.C.
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE19.5 LF
N

18.5'

18.5'
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE

17.5 LF
12" WHITE16 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
N

MATCHLINE

SEE BELOW
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE

16.5 LF
N

MATCHLINE

SEE ABOVE

18.5' 18.5'
N
RED CURB 80 LF
20 LF FROM E.O.C.

RED CURB 83 LF
20 LF FROM E.O.C.

RED CURB 85 LF
20 LF FROM E.O.C.

RED CURB 78 LF
20 LF FROM E.O.C.

DETAIL 22
68 LF
DETAIL 22
128 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE

19.5 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
12" WHITE
24 LF
RED CURB 81 LF
20 LF FROM E.O.C.

RED CURB 83 LF
20 LF FROM E.O.C.
12" WHITE

16.5 LF
N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
01 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

PATRICIA
S
MAY 2024

30'
18' 18'
DETAIL 22
219 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE16 LF
N
20' 20'
DETAIL 22
50 LF
12" WHITE16 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
16 LF
12" WHITE

24.5 LF
N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
02 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

JEFFREY, DARTMOUTH
S
MAY 2024

MATCHLINE SEE ABOVE
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S04

20.5' 20.5'

REFRESH RED
CURB 851 LF, Cont.

GREENBACK SHARROW SYMBOL
PER DETAIL G, SHEET D1
36 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 2
1052 LF, Cont.

N
SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW

17.5' 17.5'

11.5' 11' 12'

REFRESH RED
CURB 851 LF

REFRESH RED
CURB 266 LF

GREENBACK SHARROW SYMBOL
PER DETAIL G, SHEET D1
36 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 2
1052 LF
DETAIL 38
106 LF
DETAIL 22
171 LF

TYPE III ARROW
42 SQFT, Typ.
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
23 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
50 LF
N
REPLACE R26(S) SIGN

ON (E) PUNCH POST
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
03 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

CASA
S
MAY 2024

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET S03
INSTALL R1-3P

ON (E) POST
INSTALL R1-3P ON (E) POST
INSTALL R1-3P ON (E) POST
DETAIL 22
50 LF
12" WHITE

17.5 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE19.5 LF
12" WHITE14.5 LF
12" WHITE

21.5 LF
N
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
04 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

MURRAY
S
MAY 2024

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET S06
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S06

MATCHLINESEE ABOVE
R28.5'
R17.9'

45.5' 19' 20'

19.5' 19.5'

BULBOUT PER
DETAIL F, SHEET D1
8" WHITE 102 LF
12" WHITE 63 LF
DETAIL 41
71 LF
DETAIL 22
323 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
DETAIL 22
301 LF
12" WHITE
23 LF
N
SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW
19 19.5' 20'

RED CURB
20 LF
DETAIL 22
428 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
45 LF
N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
05 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

MONTALBAN, LEMON
S
MAY 2024

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET S05

5.8'

5.6'
20' 20'
INSTALL R26

SIGN BELOW
R1-1 ON (E)POST

BIKE LOOP SYMBOL
2 SQFT
NOTE: USE CAUTION WHENREMOVING (E) STRIPING TOPROTECT IN PLACE (E) TRAFFIC

SIGNAL LOOP DETECTORS

RED CURB
20 LF

RED CURB
20 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE

17.5 LF
DETAIL 22
439 LF

CROSSWALK
47 LF
N
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET S05
20' 20'

TYPE VII ARROW
27 SQFT, Typ.

TYPE IV (B) ARROW
27 SQFT
DETAIL 22
191 LF
12" WHITE16 LF
12" WHITE

15.5 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE16 LF
12" WHITE

15.5 LF
N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
06 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

OLIVE
S
MAY 2024

SEE MATCHLINE SHEET S08

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET S08
R15'
11'

13.5'

19.5'

19.5'

5.5' 9' 9.5' 10.5'
NOTE: USE CAUTION WHENREMOVING (E) STRIPING TOPROTECT IN PLACE (E) TRAFFIC

SIGNAL LOOP DETECTORS

BIKE LOOP SYMBOL
2 SQFT, Typ.

BULBOUT PER
DETAIL F, SHEET D1
8" WHITE 62 LF
12" WHITE 26 LF

BIKE ARROW

3.5 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE RIDER
7 SQFT, Typ.
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE17 LF
DETAIL 39A
124 LF
DETAIL 39
308 LF
DETAIL 22
397 LF

GREENBACK SHARROW SYMBOL
PER DETAIL G, SHEET D1
36 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 38
80 LF

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

TYPE VII ARROW
27 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE10 LF
12" WHITE
9 LF

CROSSWALK
43 LF
N
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE13 LF
N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
07 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

FOOTHILL
S
MAY 2024

MATCHLINE SEE RIGHT
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S07
9'
6'

GREENBACK SHARROW SYMBOL
PER DETAIL G, SHEET D1
36 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 39A
148 LF
DETAIL 27B
209 LF
DETAIL 22
262 LF
N

17.5'
MATCHLINE SEE BELOW MATCHLINE SEE LEFT 19'

9.5'

5.5'

RED CURB
21 LF
DETAIL 41
64 LF
DETAIL 27B
246 LF
DETAIL 22
292 LF

BIKE ARROW

3.5 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE RIDER
7 SQFT, Typ.

SHARROW

11.5 SQFT, Typ.

N
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE14.5 LF
SEE MATCHLINE SHEET S07
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET S12

16.5'
17'
DETAIL 22
342 LF
N
SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE
19' 9.5' 5.5'

GREENBACK SHARROW SYMBOL
PER DETAIL G, SHEET D1
36 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 39A
40 LF
DETAIL 27B
246 LF
DETAIL 22
292 LF
N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
08 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

FOOTHILL, CRANDALL, CARPENTER
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S12
SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW
6' 3' 10.5' 20'

14.5' 15'
20' 20'
INSTALL "BIKE LANE ENDS"
SIGN PER DETAIL L, SHEET D1
ON (N) 12' PUNCH POST
INSTALL R81(CA) AND R81B(CA)
SIGNS ON (N) 12' PUNCH POST

BIKE ARROW

3.5 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE RIDER
7 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 39A
64 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C SHEET D1
771 LF
12" WHITE

26.5 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 22
244 LF
12" WHITE15 LF
DETAIL 22
207 LF

SHARROW

11.5 SQFT, Typ.

N

MATCHLINE SEE ABOVE
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S10

6.5'
3'
10'
10'
10'

14.5'
15'
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C SHEET D1
771 LF, Cont.

N
DETAIL 22
620 LF
DETAIL 27B
595 LF
12" WHITE12 LF

SHARROW

11.5 SQFT, Typ.
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
23 LF
DETAIL 22
62 LF
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
09 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

HATHWAY
S
MAY 2024

MATCHLINE SEE BELOW
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET S09

6.5' 3'
10'
10'
10'
8' 5' 10'
2'
10' 8.5' 6'
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C SHEET D1
771 LF, Cont.

RED CURB
40 LF
DETAIL 39A
40 LF
12" WHITE

23.5 LF
12" WHITE
33 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT

SHARROW

11.5 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE ARROW

3.5 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE RIDER
DETAIL 27B 7 SQFT, Typ.
380 LF DETAIL 22
620 LF, Con.t
DETAIL 27B
595 LF, Cont.

N

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET S11
SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE
8' 6'

2.5'
10'
2'
10' 6' 8'
DETAIL 38
42 LF
DETAIL 39A
79 LF
DETAIL 22
68 LF
12" WHITE

28.5 LF 12" WHITE

25.5 LF
12" WHITE

30.5 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 39A
76 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C SHEET D1
312 LF DETAIL 27B 323 LF
DETAIL 22
390 LF

BIKE ARROW

3.5 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE RIDER
7 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C SHEET D1
331 LF
DETAIL 27B
374 LF
N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
10 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

HATHWAY, LONGVIEW
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S10

7.5'

1.5'
8' 6.5' 10' 10'
8' 6.5' 10' 10' 6.5' 8.5'

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C SHEET D1
1219 LF

DECONSTRUCT AND RECONSTRUCT
3" HIGH SPEED HUMP PER STD 7320& 7321 WITH (4) 36" WHITE PEXCO FLEX POST, EAC MODEL WITH 2
LIGHT GREY WRAPS CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
40 LF
"HUMP" LEGEND
25 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 22
420 LF
DETAIL 22
254 LF BIKE ARROW 3.5 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE RIDER
7 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 39
DETAIL 27B 1333 LF
670 LF
DETAIL 39
122 LF
DETAIL 27B
126 LF
N
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S12
SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE
8' 5.5' 10' 10' 2' 5'
8'

5.5'
10' 10'
2'

5.5'
7' 10' 10' 10'
2'

6.5'
8' 6' 10' 10'

1.5'
5'

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C SHEET D1
1219 LF, Cont.

DECONSTRUCT AND RECONSTRUCT 3"
HIGH SPEED HUMP PER STD 7320 &
7321 WITH (4) 36" WHITE PEXCO FLEX
POST, EAC MODEL WITH 2 LIGHT GREY
WRAPS

DECONSTRUCT AND RECONSTRUCT
3" HIGH SPEED HUMP PER STD 7320 &
7321 WITH (4) 36" WHITE PEXCO FLEX
POST, EAC MODEL WITH 2 LIGHT

GREY WRAPS
"HUMP" LEGEND
25 SQFT, Typ.
"HUMP" LEGEND
25 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 27B
1333 LF, Cont. DETAIL 22
77 LF
"SCHOOL" LEGEND35 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 22
251 LF

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ. DETAIL 38
60 LF

BIKE ARROW

3.5 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE RIDER
7 SQFT, Typ.

N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
11 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

SLACK
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S11

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C SHEET D1
1219 LF, Cont.
"SCHOOL" LEGEND35 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 22
367 LF
DETAIL 39
1333 LF, Cont. DETAIL 27B
418 LF
N

YELLOW HI-VIS
CROSSWALK 20 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE

9.5 LF
DETAIL 39A
40 LF
BIKE ARROW 3.5 SQFT
BIKE SYMBOL 7 SQFT
10' 2' 6.5'
8'

5.5'
10' 10'
2'

5.5'
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S13
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET S09

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET S08
21' 19'

21.5' 21.5'

RED CURB
20 LF RED CURB
20 LF

RED CURB
20 LF
12" WHITE
19 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF

GREENBACK SHARROW SYMBOL
PER DETAIL G, SHEET D1
36 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 2
199 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
20 LF
12" WHITE17.5 LF
12" WHITE
19 LF
N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
12 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

SLACK, HATHWAY
S
MAY 2024

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET S14

MATCHLINE SEE
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S12
R23.4'
R16.6'

21.5' 21.5'
12" WHITE
18 LF

BULBOUT PER
DETAIL F, SHEET D1
8" WHITE 89 LF
RED CURB 12" WHITE 54 LF
20 LF

RED CURB
20 LF
12" WHITE
54 LF

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 27B 66 LF
12" WHITE
5' O.C. 45 LF

GREENBACK SHARROW SYMBOL
PER DETAIL G, SHEET D1
36 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 22
211 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 2
199 LF
N
R63.7'
R14.9'
R64.6'

22.5'
R15'
.5'

BULBOUT PER
DETAIL F, SHEET D1,
8" WHITE 57 LF
12" WHITE 17 LF
BULBOUT PERDETAIL F, SHEET D1,
8" WHITE 100 LF
12" WHITE 81 LF
DETAIL 22
63 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE

26.5 LF
N
8' 15' 23'

RED CURB
47 LF
RED CURB 48 LF

11.5' 10.5' 24'
12" WHITE
21 LF

RED CURB
252 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
92 LF
BULBOUT PERDETAIL F, SHEET D1,
8" WHITE 31 LF
12" WHITE 13 LF
BULBOUT PER DETAIL F, SHEET D1,
8" WHITE 46 LF, 12" WHITE 27 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 22
246 LF
DETAIL 27B
101 LF
12" WHITE

31.5 LF
N
RED CURB 65 LF
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
13 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

HATHWAY, STAFFORD, TAFT
S
MAY 2024

12" WHITE
16 LF
N
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE
19 LF
12" WHITE19 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
N
12" WHITE16 LF
12" WHITE
16 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
N
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S13
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S15
20' 20'
DETAIL 22
600 LF
N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
14 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

BOND, FREDERICKS
S
MAY 2024

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET S14
12" WHITE
21 LF
12" WHITE

18.5 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
23 LF
12" WHITE
19 LF
N
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S16
13'

24.5' 22'
DETAIL 22
12" WHITE 775 LF
21 LF
12" WHITE

21.5 LF
DETAIL 22
283 LF DETAIL 22 13.5 LF
12" WHITE

22.5 LF
12" WHITE
21 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.

N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
15 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

FREDERICKS, KENTUCKY
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S15
23' 23'
DETAIL 22
775 LF, Cont.

SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW
SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE

INSTALL STREET NAME SIGNS ON (E) PUNCH POST
DAYLIGHTING BUFFERPER DETAIL C, SHEET D2
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE19.5 LF
DETAIL 20
DAYLIGHTING BUFFER 50 LFPER DETAIL C, SHEET D2
HI-VIS CROSSWALK 44 LF
DETAIL 29 44 LF 12" YELLOW 22 LF
(7) YELLOW FLEX POSTS
(4) ZICLA ZEBRA PER DETAIL B, SHEET D1

DAYLIGHTING BUFFER
PER DETAIL C, SHEET D2
HI-VIS CROSSWALK 34 LF

INSTALL STREET NAME

SIGNS ON (E) PUNCH POST

DAYLIGHTING BUFFER
PER DETAIL C, SHEET D2
12" WHITE 22 LF
N
8' 14.5' 14.5' 8'
8' 12.5' 12.5' 8'
11' 7' 11'
IF ADD. ALT. A IS

AWARDED, SEE
SHEET 60
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
16 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

FREDERICKS, HOPE
S
MAY 2024

"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
21 LF
12" WHITE19.5 LF
N
TYPE IV ARROW 15 SQFT

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
37 LF
INSTALL R3-5(R)

SIGN ON (E)

PUNCH POST
12" WHITE16.5 LF
DAYLIGHTING BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D2
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
"ONLY" LEGEND
22 SQFT DETAIL 20 50 LF
6 LF 30°
DAYLIGHTING BUFFERPER DETAIL C, SHEET D2
N
HI-VIS CROSSWALK 37 LF
8' 12' 12' 8' IF ADD. ALT. A IS AWARDED, SEE SHEET S59
12" WHITE
20 LF
12" WHITE19.5 LF
N
12" WHITE

22.5 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE

20.5 LF
N
12" WHITE
20 LF
12" WHITE17.5 LF
N
HI-VIS CROSSWALK 34 LF
DETAIL 20
50 LF

DAYLIGHTING BUFFER
PER DETAIL C, SHEET D2 12" WHITE 15 LF

DAYLIGHTING BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D2
DAYLIGHTING BUFFERPER DETAIL C, SHEET D2
HI-VIS CROSSWALK 44 LF
DETAIL 20
50 LF

DAYLIGHTING

BUFFER PER

DETAIL C,
SHEET D2
12" WHITE
23 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
7' 10' 10' 7'
11' 12' 12' 11'
N
IF ADD. ALT. A IS

AWARDED, SEE
SHEET S59 & 60
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
17 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

HAYS, McCOLLUM
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S19
23' 21'

23.5' 23.5'
DETAIL 2
199 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT 12" WHITE 22.5 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 2
199 LF
DAYLIGHTING BUFFERPER DETAIL C, SHEET D2
DETAIL 22
50 LF6 LF 30°
DAYLIGHTING BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D2
"STOP" LEGEND 22 SQFT
12" WHITE 23 LF
N
IF ADD. ALT. A IS

AWARDED, SEE
SHEET 61
"DIP" LEGEND
15 SQFT, Typ.
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE

21.5 LF
12" WHITE
23 LF
12" WHITE
20 LF
12" WHITE19 LF
N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
18 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

HOPE, LOOMIS
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S20
SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE

16.5'
22'
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 22
80 LF
12" WHITE

17.5 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 2
192 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
DETAIL 22
618 LF
12" WHITE

25.5 LF
N
SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET S20
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S18
23' 22'
12" WHITE

18.5 LF
DETAIL 22
30 LF
"POLY" LEGEND
20 SQFT
12" WHITE
21 LF
DETAIL 2
175 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
22 LF
12" WHITE
14 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
19 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

LOOMIS
S
MAY 2024

MATCHLINE SEE SHEET S22
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S19

15.5' 14.5'
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
DETAIL 22
117 LF
DETAIL 2
319 LF
12" WHITE
50 LF
12" WHITE14 LF
N
SEE MATCHLINE SHEET S19

13.5'

9.5'
10'
11'
DETAIL 22
618 LF, Cont.

DETAIL 22
54 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
25 LF
N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
20 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

LOOMIS, BUENA VISTA
S
MAY 2024

DETAIL 29 134 LF
12" YELLOW 54 LF
(7) YELLOW FLEX POSTS
(4) ZICLA ZEBRA PER DETAIL B, SHEET D1

DAYLIGHTING BUFFER
PER DETAIL C, SHEET D2

DAYLIGHTING BUFFER
PER DETAIL C, SHEET D2
12" WHITE
16 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.

N
HI-VIS CROSSWALK 55 LF
8' 12' 10.5' 12' 8' IF ADD. ALT. A IS AWARDED, SEE SHEET 62 DAYLIGHTING BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D2
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DAYLIGHTING BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D2
MODIFIED: NO RED CURB
HI-VIS CROSSWALK 40 LF
N
IF ADD. ALT. A IS

AWARDED, SEE
SHEET 62
19' 20'

17.5' 18'
DETAIL 22
185 LF
N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
21 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

ABBOT, WILSON
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S20 SEE
23' 23.5'
24' 22'
DETAIL 2
199 LF
REMOVE (E) R1-2, REPLACE WITH (N) R1-1
DETAIL 40, 29 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
HI-VIS

CROSSWALK

20.5 LF
TYPE VII ARROW, 27 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE, 24.5 LF
6" WHITE 45°, 5' O.C.

HI-VIS CROSSWALK 13 LF

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 22, 38 LF
"CLEAR" LEGEND, 27 SQFT, Typ.
"KEEP" LEGEND, 24 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 41, 29 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
35 LF

CROSSWALK
39 LF
12" WHITE
31 LF
DETAIL 22
177 LF
DETAIL 38
30 LF
N
SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW
22' 23.5'
DETAIL 2
199 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
N

DAYLIGHTINGBUFFER PER DETAIL
C, SHEET D2
12" WHITE16 LF "STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.

DAYLIGHTING BUFFERPER DETAIL C, SHEET D2
DETAIL 22
50 LF6 LF 30°
HI-VIS CROSSWALK 50 LF
TYPE IV ARROW 15 SQFT, Typ.
23' 23.5' IF ADD. ALT. A IS AWARDED, SEE SHEET 63
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
22 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

GARFIELD
S
MAY 2024

MATCHLINE SEE RIGHT

9.5'

10.5'
11'

9.5'
10' 12.5' 12' 11'
12' 12' 11.5' 12.5'
DETAIL 27B
583 LF
DETAIL 22
554 LF
DETAIL 27B
540 LF
N
12" WHITE

15.5 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE

23.5 LF
N
SEE

MATCHLINE
LEFT
12" WHITE

19.5 LF
12" WHITE18 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.

N
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE

20.5 LF
12" WHITE

23.5 LF
N

RED CURB
20 LF

RED CURB
20 LF
N

RED CURB
20 LF

RED CURB
20 LF
12" WHITE
20 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
20 LF
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
23 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

GROVE, PHILLIPS
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE

18.5' 20'
DETAIL 22 MODIFIEDPER DETAIL H, SHEET D1
50 LF
N
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE18 LF
12" WHITE
28 LF, 45° 5' O.C.

DETAIL 27B
30 LF
12" WHITE15 LF
DETAIL 22
292 LF
MATCHLINESEE SHEET S25

MATCHLINE SEE BELOW
18' 10' 13.5'
21' 19.5'

18.5' 21.5'

20.5' 20'
NOTE: USE CAUTION WHENREMOVING (E) STRIPING TOPROTECT IN PLACE (E) TRAFFIC

SIGNAL LOOP DETECTORS

RED CURB
76 LF

RED CURB
60 LF

RED CURB
87 LF
INSTALL W84(CA)
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
INSTALL W84(CA)
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
"HUMP" LEGEND
25 SQFT, Typ.
(N) SPEED HUMP(TYPE 1) PER CITY
STD 7320

GREENWAY SYMBOL PER
DETAIL J, SHEET D1

45.5 SQFT
INSTALL (N) "TORO GREENWAY"
SIGN PER DETAIL I, SHEET D1 ON
(N) PUNCH POST
DETAIL 41
36 LF

BIKE LOOP SYMBOL
2 SQFT

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
65 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE19 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
12" WHITE
18 LF
DETAIL 22
DETAIL 38 427 LF
98 LF

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

TYPE VII ARROW
27 SQFT, Typ.

N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
24 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

WALNUT, TORO
S
MAY 2024

7.5'

MEET (E) CURB)
6" WHITE 54 LF6" WHITE 45° 10' O.C.
(N) HMA DIKE PER
CITY STD. 7120
PAINTED RED 94 LF
(N) HMA DIKE PER
CITY STD. 7120
PAINTED RED 39 LF
(N) HMA DIKE PER CITY STD.
7120 PAINTED RED 39 LF

MEET (E) AC BERM
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
15 LF
N
MATCHLINESEE SHEET S24

20.5' 20'
21' 19.5'
20' 20'

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
37 LF
12" WHITE 19 LF

RED CURB
20 LF

RED CURB
22 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
39 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
37 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
37 LF
DETAIL 22
DETAIL 2 50 LF
271 LF
DETAIL 22
76 LF
12" WHITE19.5 LF
N

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET S26 DETAIL 22 50 LF 12" WHITE 19.5 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
25 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

PEACH
S
MAY 2024

MATCHLINE SEE SHEET S25
MATCHLINE SEE "STOP" LEGEND SHEET S50 22 SQFT 12" WHITE TYPE I 10' ARROW 26 LF 14 SQFT, Typ N

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET S26
25' 12.5'

12.5' 25'
12' 12'
12' 12'
12' 12'
12' 12' INSTALL R6-5P SIGN ON (N) 12' PUNCH POST
INSTALL R6-5P SIGN ON (N) 12' PUNCH POST

INSTALL PUNCH POST WITH SURFACE MOUNTED BASE IN
CENTER OF CIRCLE. INSTALL 4 OM1-3 OBJECT MARKERSON POST, ONE FACING EACH DIRECTION PER DETAIL K,SHEET D1 INSTALL (8) 6" PEXCO CITY POST, EAC MOUNT,
YELLOW POST W/ 2 YELLOW WRAPS
4" YELLOW STRIPE WITH (10) TYPE D

TWO-WAY RETROREFLECTIVE MARKERS
18' DIAMETER CIRCLE
6" YELLOW
47 LF
45° 4' O.C.

DETAIL 24, 47 LF, 4' O.C.

DETAIL 27B
7 LF
DETAIL 22, 71 LFDETAIL 24, 10.5 LF, 4' O.C.

DETAIL 27B
7 LF
DETAIL 22, 71 LFDETAIL 24, 10.5 LF, 4' O.C.

REMOVE EXISTING "BIKE MAY USE FULL
LANE" SIGN AND REPLACE WITH "TORO
GREENWAY" PER DETAIL I, SHEET D1

SIGN ON SAME POST
REMOVE EXISTING "BIKE MAY USE FULL LANE"
SIGN AND REPLACE WITH "TORO GREENWAY"SIGN PER DETAIL I, SHEET D1 ON SAME POST N

GREENWAY SYMBOL PER
DETAIL J, SHEET D1

45.5 SQFT
DETAIL 27B, 53 LF
12" WHITE, 37 LF, 10' O.C.
(18) BOTS DOTS ON STRIPES, 2' O.C.

DETAIL 27B, 50 LF
12" WHITE, 34 LF, 10' O.C.
(17) BOTS DOTS ON STRIPES, 2' O.C.

DETAIL 27B, 48 LF
12" WHITE, 35 LF, 10' O.C.
(17) BOTS DOTS ON STRIPES, 2' O.C.

DETAIL 27B, 49 LF
12" WHITE, 34 LF, 10' O.C.
(16) BOTS DOTS ON STRIPES, 2' O.C.
12" WHITE
18 LF
12" WHITE19 LF
"STOP" LEGEND 22 SQFT, Typ.
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
26 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

PEACH
S
MAY 2024

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET S28
SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S28

28.5' 28'
RED CURB 20 LF
RED CURB 20 LF RED CURB 20 LF
RED CURB 20 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE

17.5 LF
12" WHITE18 LF
DETAIL 22
DETAIL 22 50 LF
50 LF
N
DETAIL 2
607 LF
SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW

27.5' 28'
DETAIL 2
247 LF

RED CURB
20 LF

RED CURB
20 LF

RED CURB
40 LF

RED CURB
20 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
26 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
12" WHITE

17.5 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
27 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

PALM
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S27

27.5' 28'

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET S29

DAYLIGHTING BUFFER
PER DETAIL C, SHEET D2
12" WHITE 20 LF
"STOP" LEGEND 22 SQFT
DETAIL 22
50 LF
6LF 30°

DAYLIGHTING BUFFER
PER DETAIL C, SHEET D2
HI-VIS CROSSWALK 54 LF
DETAIL 2
607 LF, Cont.

TYPE IV ARROW 15 SQFT
IF ADD. ALT. A IS

AWARDED, SEE
SHEET 65

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET S27
RED CURB 20 LF
RED CURB 20 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE
17 LF
N
12" WHITE14.5 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
28 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

PALM
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S30

19.5'

3.5' 10.5'

11.5'
20' 20'
TYPE I 10' ARROW
14 SQFT, Typ

YELLOW HI-VIS

CROSSWALK
45 LF

YELLOW HI-VIS

CROSSWALK
52 LF

GREENBACK SHARROW SYMBOL
PER DETAIL G, SHEET D1
36 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 2
511 LF
DETAIL 29
130 LF

YELLOW HI-VIS

CROSSWALK
48 LF
12" WHITE
24 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 38
50 LF
N
10' 10' 13'
12'
HI-VIS CROSSWALK 25 LF
8' 8' 9'
4" BLUE

7.5' 7.5' 7.5' 8.5' 8' 7.5' 7' 7.5' 9'

9.5'
8' 8' 8' BIKE LOOP 8'
2 SQFT, Typ.

ADA MARKING
23 SQFT, Typ.

N
DETAIL 22
17 LF
4" BLUE
3' O.C.
4" WHITE
3' O.C.
4" WHITE, Typ. MATCHLINE SEE SHEET S28
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
29 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

ANDREWS, SAN LUIS
S
MAY 2024

N
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE15.5 LF
INSTALL R1-1 SIGN ON
(N) 12' PUNCH POST
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET S29
12' 8'

20.5' 12.5' 8'
8' 12.5' 12.5' 8'
20' 20'
INSTALL R1-1 SIGN ON (N) 12' PUNCH POST
BULBOUT PER DETAIL F, SHEET D1
8" WHITE 133 LF
BULBOUT PER DETAIL F, SHEET D1 12" WHITE 107 LF
8" WHITE 143 LF
12" WHITE 115 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF

GREENBACK SHARROW SYMBOL
PER DETAIL G, SHEET D1
36 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 22
50 LF
N
N
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE15.5 LF
INSTALL R1-1 SIGN ON
(N) 12' PUNCH POST
N
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE15.5 LF
INSTALL R1-1 SIGN ON
(N) 12' PUNCH POST
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
30 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

SAN LUIS DRIVE, ANDREWS
S
MAY 2024

N
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE

15.5 LF
INSTALL R1-1 SIGN ON
(N) 12' PUNCH POST
N
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE

15.5 LF
INSTALL R1-1 SIGN ON
(N) 12' PUNCH POST
N
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE15.5 LF
INSTALL R1-1 SIGN ON
(N) 12' PUNCH POST
INSTALL (N) R1-1 ON
(N) 12" PUNCH POST
INSTALL (N) R1-1 ON
(N) 12" PUNCH POST
12" WHITE
17 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE17.5 LF
N
12" WHITE17 LF
12" WHITE
17 LF
INSTALL R1-3p
BELOW (E) R1-1
INSTALL R1-3p
BELOW (E) R1-1

TURN SHARROW PER
DETAIL?
INSTALL R1-1 SIGN
ABOVE R1-3p ON (N)
12' PUNCH POST
INSTALL R1-1 SIGN
ABOVE R1-3p ON (N)
12' PUNCH POST

RED CURB
60 LF

RED CURB
85 LF

RED CURB
81 LF

RED CURB
67 LF
12" WHITE17.5 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
27 LF

GREENBACK SHARROW SYMBOL
PER DETAIL G, SHEET D1
36 SQFT, Typ.

N
INSTALL R1-1
SIGN ON (N) 12'

PUNCH POST
12" WHITE
17 LF
INSTALL R1-1
SIGN ON (N) 12'

PUNCH POST
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE17 LF
N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
31 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

SAN LUIS DRIVE, ANDREWS
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S33

MATCHLINE

SEE ABOVE
DETAIL 22
50 LF
BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C SHEET D1, 25 LF
WITH (3) WHITE 36" PEXCO CITY POST W/ EAC

MOUNT PER GENERAL NOTES
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1
25 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
41 LF
12" WHITE18 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT

SHARROW

11.5 SQFT, Typ.

N

SEE MATCHLINE
BELOW
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S50
20' 20'
6' 2'
DETAIL 22
50 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
25 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C
SHEET D1, 25 LF
WITH (3) WHITE 36" PEXCO

CITY POST W/ EAC MOUNT

PER GENERAL NOTES
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE
18 LF

SHARROW

11.5 SQFT, Typ.

N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
32 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

PEPPER
S
MAY 2024

DETAIL 22
50 LF
12" WHITE15.5 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
N
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S36
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S34

12.5' 2' 6'
12'
12'
7' 13' 13' 7'
2' 6'
RED CURB 30 LF
RED
CURB
40 LF

REMOVE (E) PARKING METER

REMOVE (E) PARKING METER
12" WHITE

20.5 LF
REMOVE EXISTING SIGN POST. REINSTALL NEW 14' PUNCH POST AND R1-1 SIGN. FURNISH

AND INSTALL RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACON (RRFB) SYSTEM, CARMANAH MODEL R920-F (MODIFIED TO INCLUDE SOLAR KIT AND PUSH BUTTON ONLY, EXCLUDE FLASHER AND PEDESTRIAN SIGNS). ORIENT PUSH BUTTON TO FACE BIKE LANE ON TOR STREET. SYNC WITH EXISTING RRFB SYSTEM INSTALLED AT THIS INTERSECTION.

REMOVE (E) BIKE TURN BOX

INCLUDE IN SLURRY LIMITS
REMOVE EXISTING "BIKE MAY USE FULL LANE" SIGN
AND REPLACE WITH "TORO GREENWAY" SIGN PER
DETAIL I, SHEET D1 ON SAME POST
REMOVE (E) POST AND INSTALL R1-3P
SIGN ON (N) 12' PUNCH POST
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
57 LF
CASE 3 BIKE
LANE PER DETAILD, SHEET D1
57 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1, 25 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
25 LF
RED CURB 20 LF
REMOVE EXISTING SIGN POST. REINSTALL NEW 14' PUNCH POST AND R1-1 SIGN. FURNISH AND INSTALL RECTANGULAR RAPID
FLASHING BEACON (RRFB) SYSTEM, CARMANAH MODEL R920-F
(MODIFIED TO INCLUDE SOLAR KIT AND PUSH BUTTON ONLY,
EXCLUDE FLASHER AND PEDESTRIAN SIGNS). ORIENT PUSHBUTTON TO FACE BIKE LANE ON TOR STREET. SYNC WITHEXISTING RRFB SYSTEM INSTALLED AT THIS INTERSECTION.

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C SHEET D1, 25 LF
BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C SHEET D1, 25 LF
WITH (3) WHITE 36" PEXCO CITY POST W/ EAC

MOUNT PER GENERAL NOTES
REMOVE EXISTING "BIKE MAY USE
FULL LANE" SIGN AND REPLACE
WITH "TORO GREENWAY" SIGN PER
GREENWAY SYMBOL PER DETAIL I, SHEET D1 ON SAME POST
DETAIL J, SHEET D1

45.5 SQFT
DETAIL 22
642 LF
12" WHITE19.5 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.

N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
33 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

TORO, PACIFIC
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE
18' 10.5' 12'

20.5' 20'
20' 20'

TYPE VII ARROW
27 SQFT

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT

BIKE LOOP
2 SQFT, Typ.

HI-VIS CROSSWALK

37.5 LF
12" WHITE

24.5 LF
DETAIL 38
40 LF
DETAIL 22
339 LF
12" WHITE17.5 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
37 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
37 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE

17.5 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 2
175 LF, Cont.

N
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S32

RED CURB
45 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE17.5 LF
12" WHITE

19.5 LF
N

MATCHLINE

SEE BELOW

20.5' 19.5'
N
DETAIL 2
175 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE19.5 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
34 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

PEEPER, PALM
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S35MATCHLINE SEE ABOVE
7' 13' 13' 7'
20' 20'
6' 2'
12" WHITE

20.5 LF

RED CURB
56 LF
RED CURB 21 LF

RED CURB
25 LF
BLUE CURB (22 LF), INTERNATIONAL

SYMBOL O F ACCESSIBILITY PAVEMENT
MARKING, INSTALL R99 (CA) AND R99B
(CA) SIGNS ON 12' PUNCH POST PER
CALTRANS STD PLAN A90B
BLUE CURB (22 LF), INTERNATIONAL

SYMBOL O F ACCESSIBILITY PAVEMENT
MARKING, INSTALL R99 (CA) AND R99B
(CA) SIGNS ON 12' PUNCH POST PER
CALTRANS STD PLAN A90B

INSTALL FLOURESCENT YELLOW/GREEN
PED/BIKE CROSSING SIGNS (W11-15) ON
(N) 12' PUNCH POST

INSTALL FLOURESCENT

YELLOW/GREEN

PED/BIKE CROSSING
SIGNS (W11-15) ON (N)
12' PUNCH POST

GREENBACK

SHARROW
40 SQFT,
Typ.

CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1
25 LF

RED CURB
40 LF
PARKING "T"s PER
CITY STD 7410, Typ.

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C SHEET D1, 25 LF
WITH (3) WHITE 36" PEXCO CITY POST W/ EAC

MOUNT PER GENERAL NOTES

GREENWAY SYMBOL PER
DETAIL J, SHEET D1

45.5 SQFT
DETAIL 22
264 LF
DETAIL 22
213 LF
12" WHITE

19.5 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
20 LF
N
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S34
SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW
2' 6'
20' 20'
RED
CURB
13 LF
RED CURB 20 LF
RED CURB 10 LF
RED CURB 25 LF
RED CURB 25 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1
25 LF
PARKING "T"s PER CITY STD 7410, Typ.

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C SHEET D1, 25 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF

GREENWAY SYMBOL PER
DETAIL J, SHEET D1

45.5 SQFT
12" WHITE
18 LF
DETAIL 22
"STOP" LEGEND 50 LF
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE18 LF
12" WHITE
20 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
46 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
46 LF
N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
35 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

TORO
S
MAY 2024

"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE18.5 LF
N

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET S37
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S38
BIKE ARROW 3.5 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE RIDER 7 SQFT, Typ.

INSTALL FLUORESCENT
YELLOW/GREEN (N) W11-15 AND
W16-7P SIGNS ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST

GREENWAY SYMBOL PER
DETAIL J, SHEET D1

45.5 SQFT
(E) BRIDGE 12" WHITE
18 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
19 LF
DETAIL 22
642 LF, Cont.

N
DETAIL 22
50 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE18.5 LF
N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
36 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

TORO, PACIFIC, PISMO
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S36
N
BIKE ARROW 3.5 SQFT, Typ.BIKE RIDER 7 SQFT, Typ.

CHEVRON
24 SQFT
DETAIL 27B
455 LF
DETAIL 27B
455 LF
DETAIL 27B
583 LF
DETAIL 39A
52 LF
DETAIL 39A
52 LF

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

TYPE VII ARROW27 SQFT
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
31 LF
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S38
N
DETAIL 27B
603 LF
DETAIL 2
487 LF
DETAIL 27B
583 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
35 LF
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
37 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

PISMO, BUCHON
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S39

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET S37

MATCHLINE
SEE

MATCHLINE

SEE ABOVE
SHEET S36
DETAIL 22
46 LF
INSTALL (N) "ISLAY GREENWAY" SIGN PER DETAIL I, SHEET
D1 AND W16-7P (right) SIGN ON (N) 12" PUNCH POST
REMOVE EXISTING "BIKE MAY USE FULL LANE"
SIGN AND REPLACE WITH "TORO GREENWAY"
SIGN PER DETAIL I, SHEET D1 ON SAME POST

GREENWAY SYMBOL PER
DETAIL J, SHEET D1

45.5 SQFT
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
N
SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW
8' 12' 12' 8'

REMOVE AND REPLACE

TRUNCATED DOMES PER
CITY STD 4440
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE18.5 LF
HI-VIS

CROSSWALK
18 LF
HI-VIS

CROSSWALK

14.5 LF
DETAIL 22
111 LF
DETAIL 27B
81 LF
DETAIL 27B
334 LF
DETAIL 27B
194 LF
DETAIL 2
79 LF
"HUMP" LEGEND
26 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 22
45 LF

MATCH (E)

DECONSTRUCT AND RECONSTRUCT
SPEED HUMP PER CITY STD 7320, TYPE 1
N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
38 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

BUCHON, TORO
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S38
RED CURB 62 LF
12" WHITE 50 LF

GREENWAY SYMBOL PER
DETAIL J, SHEET D1

45.5 SQFT
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
N
BULBOUT PER DETAIL F, SHEET D1
8" WHITE 42 LF
12" WHITE 80 LF
INSTALL (N) "TORO GREENWAY"
SIGN PER DETAIL I, SHEET D1 AND
W16-7p (L) ON (N) 12" PUNCH POST
DETAIL 22
190 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
REMOVE (E) R4-11 SIGN. INSTALL (N) "ISLAY
GREENWAY" SIGN PER DETAIL I, SHEET D1
N

GREENWAY SYMBOL PER
DETAIL J, SHEET D1

45.5 SQFT
12" WHITE19 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
39 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

ISLAY, LEFF
S
MAY 2024

MATCHLINE

SEE ABOVE
NOTE: USE CAUTION WHEN

REMOVING (E) STRIPING TO

PROTECT IN PLACE (E) TRAFFIC

SIGNAL LOOP DETECTORS

BIKE LOOP SYMBOL
2 SQFT
12" WHITE14 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
12" WHITE 22 SQFT, Typ.

15.5 LF
DETAIL 22
291 LF
DETAIL 38
29 LF

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

CROSSWALK
40 LF
N
12" WHITE
19 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
N

MATCHLINESEE BELOW

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

TYPE I 10' ARROW
14 SQFT, Typ.
"ONLY" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.

N
18'

17.5'
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE

8.5 LF
DETAIL 22
55 LF
N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
40 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

LIZZIE
S
MAY 2024

17' 17'
DETAIL 22
89 LF
12" WHITE
11 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE17 LF
N

17.5' 17'

17.5' 17'
BIKE ARROW 3.5 SQFT, Typ.BIKE RIDER 7 SQFT, Typ.

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.
"ONLY" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ. DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 27B
33 LF
DETAIL 27B
26 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF TYPE VII
27 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 27B
11 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE

8.5 LF
N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
41 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

IRIS, WOODLAND
S
MAY 2024

DETAIL 22
50 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE

8.5 LF
N
10' 10' 20'

BIKE LOOP SYMBOL
2 SQFT
DETAIL 22
50 LF
12" WHITE
19 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT

CROSSWALK
37 LF
DETAIL 22
57 LF
DETAIL 388
57 LF

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

TYPE VII ARROW
27 SQFT, Typ.

N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
42 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

ELLA, FIXLINI
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S44

8.5' 11.5' 11.5' 8'
8' 10' 10' 8'

RED CURB
20 LF FROM E.O.C.

Typ. THIS INTERSECTION
DETAIL 2
247 LF
12" WHITE
21 LF 12" WHITE

25.5 LF
DETAIL 22
DETAIL 22 50 LF
50 LF
DETAIL 2
607 LF, Cont.

SHARROW

11.5 SQFT, Typ.
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
15 LF
N
SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW
8' 10' 10' 8'
"HUMP" LEGEND
25 SQFT, Typ.

INSTALL W84(CA)
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
INSTALL W84(CA)
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
DETAIL 2
607 LF

YELLOW HI-VIS

CROSSWALK
40 LF

RED CURB
20 LF FROM E.O.C.Typ. THIS INTERSECTION

GREENBACK SHARROW SYMBOL
PER DETAIL G, SHEET D1
36 SQFT, Typ. "STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 22
50 LF
12" WHITE15 LF

YELLOW HI-VIS

CROSSWALK
30 LF
12" WHITE
17 LF
N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
43 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

HIGHLAND
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE SEE MATCHLINE SHEET S45
8' 12' 12' 8'
8' 12.5' 12.5' 8'
INSTALL W84(CA)
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
DETAIL 2
343 LF
12" WHITE18.5 LF

YELLOW HI-VIS

CROSSWALK
47 LF
12" WHITE

32.5 LF
12" WHITE
18 LF
DETAIL 2
151 LF DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.

SHARROW

11.5 SQFT, Typ.

N
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S43
SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW
8' 12.5' 12.5' 8'
8' 12.5' 12.5' 8'
8' 12.5' 12.5' 8'
"HUMP" LEGEND
25 SQFT, Typ.

SHARROW

11.5 SQFT, Typ.

INSTALL W84(CA)
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
INSTALL W84(CA)
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST

RED CURB
20 LF FROM E.O.C.Typ. THIS INTERSECTION

RED CURB
20 LF FROM E.O.C.

Typ. THIS INTERSECTION 12" WHITE

16.5 LF
12" WHITE
14 LF
DETAIL 2
103 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.

N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
44 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

HIGHLAND
S
MAY 2024

SEE MATCHLINE SHEET S44

5.5'

10.5'

4.5'

19.5'

4.5'

6.5'
2'
12' 13' 8' 8'
8'
EDGE GRIND 223 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
52 LF

BIKE ARROW

3.5 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE RIDER
7 SQFT, Typ.

CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
85 LF
INSTALL (N) 12" PUNCH POST
BIKE BUFFER PER WITH (N) R7-9 SIGN
DETAIL C SHEET D1
221 LF
(5) FLEX POSTS

RED CURB
224 LF INSTALL (N) 12" PUNCH POST
WITH MODIFIED R61-36(CA) SIGN

WITH A LEFT / THRU-LEFT /

THRU-RIGHT CONFIGURATION
"HUMP" LEGEND
25 SQFT, Typ.

INSTALL W84(CA)
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
DETAIL 29
79 LF
DETAIL 2
79 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF

SHARROW

11.5 SQFT, Typ.

N
12'
12'
RED CURB 77 LF
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
45 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

HIGHLAND
S
MAY 2024

SEE MATCHLINE ABOVE

7.5' 5' 10' 10' 7.5'

BIKE ARROW

3.5 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE RIDER
7 SQFT, Typ.

CROSSWALK
37 LF
12" WHITE

18.5 LF "STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT "AHEAD" LEGEND 31 SQFT
DETAIL 22
376 LF
DETAIL 27B
366 LF
DETAIL 27B
687 LF, Cont.

N

SEE MATCHLINE BELOW
MATCHLINESEE SHEET S47

CROSSWALK
29 LF
12" WHITE18 LF

CROSSWALK
19 LF
12" WHITE19 LF
DETAIL 22
268 LF DETAIL 27B
687 LF
DETAIL 27B
259 LF

SHARROW

11.5 SQFT
N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
46 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

CHORRO
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S46

GREENBACK

SHARROW
40 SQFT, Typ.
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE18 LF
N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
47 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

MURRAY
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S49
SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE

GREENBACK

SHARROW
40 SQFT, Typ. INSTALL W84(CA)
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
INSTALL W84(CA)
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
INSTALL W84(CA)
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
"HUMP" LEGEND
25 SQFT, Typ.
"HUMP" LEGEND
25 SQFT, Typ.

N
DETAIL 22
350 LF
12" WHITE16 LF "STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
15 LF
DETAIL 22
825 LF, Cont.

SEE MATCHLINE BELOW

GREENBACK

SHARROW
40 SQFT, Typ.

INSTALL W84(CA)
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
INSTALL W84(CA)
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
"HUMP" LEGEND
25 SQFT, Typ.

N
DETAIL 22
50 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
12" WHITE17 LF
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
48 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

BROAD
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE
"25" LEGEND

17.5 SQFT, Typ.

N
DETAIL 22
247 LF
SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S48

GREENBACK

SHARROW
40 SQFT, Typ. INSTALL W84(CA) ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
INSTALL W84(CA)
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
INSTALL W84(CA)
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
"HUMP" LEGEND
25 SQFT, Typ.

N
DETAIL 22
279 LF
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
49 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

BROAD
S
MAY 2024

MATCHLINE
SEE SHEET S32
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET S26
SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW

9.5' 10' 10' 9.5'
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1
37 LF
INSTALL (N) "MILL GREENWAY"
SIGN PER DETAIL I, SHEET D1

ON (N) PUNCH POST
INSTALL (N) "MILL GREENWAY"
SIGN PER DETAIL I, SHEET D1

ON (N) PUNCH POST
12" WHITE19 LF

GREENWAY SYMBOL PER
DETAIL J, SHEET D1

45.5 SQFT, Typ.
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 22
50 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
43 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
35 LF

BIKE LOOP
DETAIL 27B 2 SQFT, Typ.
448 LF
DETAIL 27B
450 LF
DETAIL 22
439 LF
12" WHITE19.5 LF
RED CURB 20 LF

RED CURB
20 LF
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S51 SHEET S50
SEE

MATCHLINE

ABOVE BELOW
11' 10' 10' 11'
(N) SPEED CUSHION

PER DETAIL B,
SHEET D2
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
37 LF

ADA MARKING
23 SQFT
DETAIL 2
271 LF
INSTALL W17-1
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
INSTALL W17-1
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
"HUMP" LEGEND
25 SQFT, Typ.

GREENWAY SYMBOL PER
DETAIL J, SHEET D1

45.5 SQFT, Typ.

INSTALL (N) "MILL GREENWAY"
SIGN PER DETAIL I, SHEET D1 ON
(N) PUNCH POST
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE17.5 LF
12" WHITE

18.5 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 27B
385 LF
DETAIL 27B
386 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF

BIKE LOOP
2 SQFT, Typ.

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
35 LF
N
N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
50 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

MILL
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S50
10' 10' 10' 10'
(N) SPEED CUSHION

PER DETAIL B,
SHEET D2
INSTALL W17-1
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
INSTALL W17-1
ON (N) 12' PUNCH
POST
"HUMP" LEGEND
25 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 22
50 LF
DETAIL 2
391 LF
DETAIL 27B
712 LF
DETAIL 27B
506 LF

SHARROW

11.5 SQFT, Typ.

N
SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW

9.5' 10' 10' 9.5'

GREENWAY SYMBOL PER
DETAIL J, SHEET D1

45.5 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 2
55 LF
DETAIL 27B
156 LF
DETAIL 22
50 LF
SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE
HI-VIS CROSSWALK 40 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT
DETAIL 22
25 LF
12" WHITE

19.5 LF
INSTALL (N) "MILL GREENWAY"
SIGN PER DETAIL I, SHEET D1

ON (N) PUNCH POST
IF ADD. ALT. A IS

AWARDED, SEE
SHEET 64
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
51 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

MILL
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S53

SEE ABOVE
8' 6'
2'
10' 12' 10'
2'
6' 8'
12' 14.5' 13' 12.5' 5' 7'
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
77 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
100 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1
30 LF
DETAIL 32
428 LF, Cont.

DETAIL 27B
767 LF, Cont.

DETAIL 27B
918 LF, Cont.

DETAIL 27B
709 LF, Cont. DETAIL 27B 525 LF, Cont.

BIKE RIDER SYMBOL
2 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE ARROW

3.5 SQFT, Typ.

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C,
SHEET D1
282 LF
DETAIL 32
200 LF "SLOW" LEGEND
23 SQFT
"SCHOOL" LEGEND
35 LF

BIKE BUFFER

PER DETAIL C
SHEET D1
123 LF
DETAIL 27B
148 LF
"XING" LEGEND
21 LF EDGE GRIND
101 LF
N
SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW

6.5' 10.5' 10' 10' 10' 11' 6'

5.5' 5' 10' 10' 10' 10' 5' 7'

6.5' 5' 8' 13' 9.5' 10' 5' 7'

EDGE GRIND
170 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
38 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
88 LF
HI-VIS

CROSSWALK
65 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
65 LF
DETAIL 32
492 LF DETAIL 22
65 LF

BIKE ARROW

3.5 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE RIDER
7 SQFT, Typ.

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
70 LF
TYPE I 10' ARROW
14 SQFT, Typ.

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 39
60 LF
DETAIL 27B
50 LF
DETAIL 27B
50 LF
DETAIL 9
751 LF DETAIL 39 767 LF
DETAIL 27B
918 LF
DETAIL 22
420 LF
DETAIL 9
319 LF
DETAIL 39
706 LF
DETAIL 27B
525 LF

TYPE VI ARROW
42 SQFT, Typ.

EDGE GRIND
171 LF
N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
52 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

JOHNSON
S
MAY 2024

MATCHLINE SEE SHEET S54
SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE
2'

6.5' 8'
8' 6.5'
2'

10.5' 10.5' 12.5' 6.5' 8'

BIKE RIDER SYMBOL
2 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE ARROW

3.5 SQFT, Typ.

CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
30 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1
92 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1
88 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1
87 LF
DETAIL 27B
361 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
333 LF
DETAIL 32
BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C, 467 LF
SHEET D1
1883 LF, Cont.

DETAIL 27B
1774 LF, Cont.

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

N
SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S52
8' 6.5'
2'
10' 10' 10.5'
2'

6.5' 8'

11.5'
2'
5'

8.5' 11.5' 4.5'
13' 7.5'

8.5' 11.5' 4.5' 13.5' 6'

11.5'
2'
7'
INSTALL R4-7
SIGN ON (N) 12'

PUNCH POST
INSTALL R4-7
SIGN ON (N) 12'

PUNCH POST
INSTALL R4-7
SIGN ON (N) 12'

PUNCH POST
DETAIL 29
77 LF

REMOVE ANDREINSTALL (E) PUNCHPOST WITH RRFB

EDGE GRIND
201 LF
CASE 2 BIKE

LANE PER DETAIL
D, SHEET D1
148 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
30 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
148 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
52 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1 42 LF CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
25 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
30 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
25 LF
CASE 1 BIKE

LANE PER

DETAIL D,
SHEET D1
30 LF
DETAIL 22, 50 LF
DETAIL 22, 50 LF

MEDIAN PER

DETAIL A, SHEET
D2
62 LF

REMOVE POST AND

SIGNS ENGINEER TO

CONFIRM IN FIELD

EDGE GRIND
254 LF
4" WHITE 81 LF
12" WHITE 45°
5' O.C. 22 LF
(5) FLEX POSTS
YIELD LINE 8Δ
12 SQFT

YELLOW HI-VIS

CROSSWALK
65 LF
4" WHITE 105 LF
12" WHITE 45°
5' O.C. 37 LF
(5) FLEX POSTS
YIELD LINE 9Δ

13.5 SQFT
DETAIL 39
25 LF
"SLOW" LEGEND
23 SQFT
"SCHOOL" LEGEND
35 LF
"XING" LEGEND
21 LF
MEDIAN PERDETAIL A, SHEETD2
66 LF

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 27B
219 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C,
SHEET D1
187 LF
DETAIL 32
294 LF BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
1883 LF
DETAIL 27B
1788 LF
RED CURB 25 LF
RED CURB 25 LF

ADJUST GAS VALVE

TO ELEVATION
12" WHITE 17 LF
12" WHITE18 LF
"STOP" LEGEND 22 SQFT, Typ.

N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
53 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

JOHNSON
S
MAY 2024

MATCHLINE SEE SHEET S55
SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE

11.5' 5'

6.5'

14.5'
8' 6.5'
2'
10'
8' 6.5'
2'

10.5' 10.5' 10'
2'

6.5' 8'

6.5' 12'
10'
12'
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
92 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
92 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
88 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
164 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1
30 LF

RED CURB
45 LF
DETAIL 27B
800 LF, Cont.

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C,
SHEET D1949 LF, Cont.

DETAIL 32
941 LF, Cont.

BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
1883 LF, Cont.

DETAIL 27B
1774 LF, Cont.

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE RIDER SYMBOL 2 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE ARROW 3.5 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 29
61 LF
DETAIL 22
62 LF
DETAIL 38
50 LF

TYPE I ARROW
14 SQFT

EDGE GRIND
80 LF
N
SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET S53
8' 6.5'
2'

10.5' 10.5' 10.5'
2'

6.5' 8'
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1
88 LF
DETAIL 27B
800 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C,
SHEET D1949 LF
DETAIL 32
BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C, 941 LF
SHEET D1
1883 LF, Cont.

DETAIL 27B
1774 LF, Cont.

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

N
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
54 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

JOHNSON
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S56

MATCHLINE SEE ABOVE
7' 6' 3' 10.5' 10.5' 10.5' 3' 6' 8'
DETAIL 32
1209 LF, Cont.

DETAIL 27B
1268 LF, Cont.

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C,
SHEET D1
1180 LF, Cont.

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C,
SHEET D1
1342 LF, Cont.

DETAIL 27B
1338 LF, Cont.

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

N

MATCHLINE SEE BELOW
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S54
8' 5' 3' 11' 10.5' 10.5' 5.5' 10.5'
8' 6'
2'

10.5' 10.5' 10.5' 6'
2'
8'
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
75 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
100 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
63 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
62 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
34 LF
DETAIL 32
1209 LF
DETAIL 27B
1268 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
1180 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
1342 LF
DETAIL 27B
1338 LF
DETAIL 22
DETAIL 38 154 LF
TYPE I 10' ARROW
14 SQFT, Typ.

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE RIDER SYMBOL
2 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE ARROW

3.5 SQFT, Typ.

N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
55 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

JOHNSON
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S57
SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE
BIKE RIDER SYMBOL 2 SQFT, Typ.BIKE ARROW 3.5 SQFT, Typ.

CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
88 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
30 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
52 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
97 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
30 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
40 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1
107 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
30 LF
BIKE RIDER SYMBOL 2 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE ARROW 3.5 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 22
99 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
91 LF
DETAIL 27B
60 LF
DETAIL 38
50 LF DETAIL 32
90 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
96 LF
DETAIL 27B
66 LF
DETAIL 32
202 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
553 LF
DETAIL 27B
553 LF

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 32
94 LF
N
DETAIL 27B
30 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
84 LF

8.5' 6'
2'

10.5' 11.5' 10.5'
2'
6' 7.5'
13 '

SEE MATCHLINE BELOW
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET S55

6.5'
6'
3'

10.5'

10.5'

10.5'
3'
6'
8'
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
22 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
100 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
32 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
112 LF
INSTALL (N) R26 SIGN ON
(N) 12' PUNCH POST
INSTALL (N) R26 SIGN ON
(N) 12' PUNCH POST

BULBOUT PER
DETAIL F, SHEET D1
8" WHITE 400 LF
12" WHITE 197 LF
(9) FLEX POSTS
BULBOUT PER DETAIL F, SHEET D1
8" WHITE 148 LF
12" WHITE 105 LF
(9) FLEX POSTS
BULBOUT PERDETAIL F, SHEET D1
8" WHITE 117 LF
12" WHITE 117 LF
(11) FLEX POSTS
(5) FLEX POSTS
4" WHITE 104 LF
12" WHITE 45°12' O.C. 26 LF
(3) FLEX POSTS
4" WHITE 104 LF
12" WHITE 45°
12' O.C. 26 LF
(3) FLEX POSTS
DETAIL 29, 123 LFDETAIL 22, 28 LF
(14) FLEX POSTS
BIKE RIDER SYMBOL 2 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE ARROW 3.5 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 29, 126 LF
DETAIL 22, 45 LF
(12) FLEX POSTS
DETAIL 32
1209 LF, Cont.

DETAIL 27B
1268 LF, Cont.

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
1180 LF, Cont.

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
1324 LF, Cont.

DETAIL 27B
1338 LF, Cont.

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

N

8.5'
6'
2' 10.5'

11.5'

10.5' 2'
6'

7.5'

3.5'

10.5'

10.5' 2'
6'

10.5'
6'
5'
5'
6'

4.5'

4.5'

3.5' 10.5'

8.5'
6'
2'

10.5'

7.5'

13.5'

10.5'

10.5'
6'

10.5'
3'

5.5' 8.5' 10.5'
3'
6' 8'
5'
13'
DETAIL 22, 28 LF
(2) FLEX POSTS
DETAIL 22, 19 LF
(2) FLEX POSTS
0 40 80

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
56 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

JOHNSON
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S56
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
21 LF
DETAIL 22
104 LF

GREENBACK SHARROW SYMBOL
PER DETAIL G, SHEET D1
36 SQFT, Typ.

EDGE GRIND
194 LF

EDGE GRIND
336 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
30 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1
82 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
30 LF
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
100 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1
97 LF
DETAIL 38
100 LF
DETAIL 27B
152 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, Typ.
12" WHITE
10' O.C. 45°
42 LF
12" WHITE
43 LF
DETAIL 22
153 LF
DETAIL 39A
40 LF
DETAIL 27B
314 LF
DETAIL 32
183 LF

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ. DETAIL 38
50 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
236 LF
DETAIL 27B
236 LF
N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
57 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

JOHNSON
S
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
CENTER

4.5' 4.5'

4.5' 4.5'

BIKE LOOP SYMBOL
2 SQFT, Typ.

SEE DETAIL A,SHEET D1327 LF
DETAIL 27B
1480 LF
DETAIL 27B
939 LF
DETAIL 24
43 LF
DETAIL 24
205 LF
DETAIL 27B
160 LF
DETAIL 27B
161 LF
12" WHITE
5 LF
N
SEE

MATCHLINE
BELOW
SEE

MATCHLINE
ABOVE

4.5' 4.5'
DETAIL 24
39 LF

BIKE ARROW

3.5 SQFT, Typ.

BIKE RIDER
7 SQFT, Typ.

SEE DETAIL A,SHEET D1327 LF, Cont.

DETAIL 27B
1480 LF, Cont.

DETAIL 27B
939 LF, Cont.

N
SEE

MATCHLINE
CENTER

4.5' 4.5'
DETAIL 24
75 LF
DETAIL 24
100 LF
SEE DETAIL A,SHEET D1327 LF
DETAIL 27B
1480 LF, Cont.

DETAIL 27B
525 LF
N
0 40 80 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
58 

2000615
DATE
1" = 40'
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATIONSCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

RAILROAD SAFETY TRAIL
S
MAY 2024

Southwood Drive

SENIOR CITIZENS
CENTER
5 1
2 3
4 6

9.00' (TYP.) 63.00' 7 SPACES
@ 9' 0"
14' 8.5"

1.96' (TYP.)

17.00'
2 SPACES @ 8' 6"
N

2.50'

3.35'

9.00'8.25'9.00'8.25'9.00'
7 7
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.DATE:

PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:
of
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:SCALE:PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION CONSTRUCTION NOTES:

1. PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE CURB (TYP.)

2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CBC SECTION 11B-502.6 REQUIREMENTS

3. 4" WIDE WHITE PARKING STALL LINE

4. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AISLE WITH 4" WIDE BLUE
BORDER STRIPE AND 4" WIDE DIAGONAL BLUE

5. REMOVE AND REINSTALL EXISTING WHEEL STOPS6. EXISTING SIDEWALK - PROTECT IN PLACE7. NO PARKING SYMBOL IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALTRANS STD A24E
NGN
NGN
SM
BN
1" = 10'
2000615
ROADWAY SEALING 2024

MITCHELL PARK PARKING LOT
S59
0 10 20
No. C 79870
BRIAN A. NELSON

C I V I L
DATE


MAY 2024

SAN LUIS OBISPO

COUNTY YMCA

SOUTHWOOD DR

STORAGE CONTAINER STORAGE CONTAINER STORAGE STORAGE CONTAINER CONTAINER STORAGE STORAGE CONTAINER CONTAINER 7 7
7 7
6 17.5' (TYP.)
7 5.0'

37.3' 4 SPACES @ 9' - 4"

6.0' 9.0'

6.0' 6.0'

9.25' 9.12' 8.88' 7.10'

10.43'

9.07'

8.93'

9.00'

6.0' 12.68' 9.06'

36.00'
4 SPACES @ 9 '- 0"

36.67'
4 SPACES @ 9' - 2"

45.00'
5 SPACES @ 9' - 0" 8.86' 8.84' 25.50' 3 SPACES @ 8' - 6"

9.89'
N

39.00'
4 SPACES @ 9 - 8" 9.60'

11.37'

33.66' 4 SPACES @ 8' - 5"
1 2
3 4
5 CITY SPECIFICATION NO.DATE:

PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:
of
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:SCALE:PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION CONSTRUCTION NOTES:

1. PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE CURB (TYP.)

2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CBC SECTION 11B-502.6 REQUIREMENTS

3. 4" WIDE WHITE PARKING STALL LINE

4. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AISLE WITH 4" WIDE BLUE
BORDER STRIPE AND 4" WIDE DIAGONAL WHITE

5. REMOVE AND REINSTALL EXISTING WHEEL STOPS6. EXISTING SIDEWALK - PROTECT IN PLACE

7. EXISTING TREE - PROTECT IN PLACE

8. NO PARKING SYMBOL IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CALTRANS STD A24E
NGN
NGN
SM
BN
1" = 20'
2000615
ROADWAY SEALING 2024

JOHNSON PARK PARKING LOT
S60
No. C 79870
BRIA N A. NELSON
C I V I L 0 20 40


MAY 2024

smh
smh
INDUSTRIAL WAY smh
smh
2 9
11 3
3 3
3 10
7 4
12 5
6 255'
30 SPACES @ 8' 6"
28'
7 SPACES @ 4' 0
205'
24 (TYP) SPACES @ 8' 6"
127.5'
15 SPACES @ 8' - 6'
12" WHITE
10 LF
"STOP" LEGEND
22 SQFT, TYP.

8.5' (TYP.)

18.00'

4.0 '

4.17'

9.27' 11.51' 11.11' 11.39' 8.46'

9.01' 8.50' 8.46' 11.12'

9.18' 8.86' 5.00' 9.12' 8.48' 8.00' 9.01' 8.08'
119'
14 SPACES @ 8' - 6"
119'
14 SPACES @ 8' - 6"
34'
4 SPACES @ 8' - 6"

18.00' (TYP)

8.0'
N

8.5' (TYP.)

17.00'

8.50'
102.00'
12 SPACES @ 8' 6" 8.96'

11.71'
CITY SPECIFICATION NO.DATE:

PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:
of
SHEET NO.DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY:SCALE:PLAN FILE NO. / LOCATION CONSTRUCTION NOTES:

1. REMOVE AND REINSTALL EXISTING

WHEEL STOPS

2. PROTECT EXISTING CONCRETE CURB
(TYP.)

3. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING PARKING
ISLANDS (TYP.)

4. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING LIGHTS
(TYP.)

5. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL IN

ACCORDANCE WITH CBC SECTION
11B-502.6 REQUIREMENTS

6. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AISLE WITH 4" WIDE
BLUE BORDER STRIPE AND 4" WIDEDIAGONAL WHITE

7. 4" WIDE WHITE PARKING STALL LINE

8. PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING CONCRETE
PAD

9. 4" WIDE WHITE MOTORCYCLE PARKING

STALL LINE

10. EXISTING MANHOLE TO BE PROTECTED IN
PLACE

11. EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER TO BE

PROTECTED IN PLACE

12. EXISTING DRAINAGE DITCH TO BE

PROTECT IN PLACE

13. NO PARKING SYMBOL IN ACCORDANCE
WITH CALTRANS STD A24E
NGN
NGN
SM
BN
1" = 30'
2000615
ROADWAY SEALING 2024

DAMON GARCIA PARKING LOT
S61 69
No. C 79870
BRIAN A. NELSON

C I V I L
0 30 60
MAY 2024 DATE

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S59
DETAIL 39A, 16 LF
DETAIL 82, 204 LF
RED CURB 50 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1, 17 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1, 17 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C,
SHEET D1, 27 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1 52 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
17 LF

TYPE VII ARROW
27 SQFT, Typ.

YELLOW HI-VIS CROSSWALK 44 LF
DETAIL 24, 204 LF
BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C, SHEET D1, 30 LF
(5) ZICLA ZEBRA PER DETAIL B, SHEET D1
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
257 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
116 LF
DETAIL 22, 122 LF
12" WHITE 69 LF
(12) 36" YELLOW FLEX POSTS
12" WHITE 40 LF
RED CURB 6 LF
YELLOW HI-VIS CROSSWALK 86 LF
N

PROTECT IN PLACE
(E) DECORATIVE

CROSSWALK
REFUGE PERDETAIL G, SHEET D2

SHARROW

11.5 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 39A
28 LF
BIKE ARROW 3.5 SQFT
BIKE RIDER 7 SQFT
12" WHITE 10 LF
REMOVE (E) SIGN POLE AND (E) SIGNS. REINSTALL (E) R1-1, (E) R1-3P, AND (N) STREET NAME SIGNS SIGNS ON (N) 12' PUNCH POST IN SAME LOCATION REMOVE (E) SR4-1(CA) AND INSTALL (N) W4-2 & R26(CA)
DETAIL 9
55 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL
F, SHEET D2, 202 LF
R8'
INSTALL R4-1 SIGN ON
(N) 12' PUNCH POST

INSTALL
SR4-1(CA) ON
(E) PUNCH
POST
INSTALL R4-1
SIGN ON (N) 12'

PUNCH POST
INSTALL (N) STREET NAME SIGNS ON (E) PUNCH POST.

INSTALL R10-15(MOD) SIGN ON (N) PUNCH POST
BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL F, SHEET D2, 102 LF
(9) ZICLA AND (3) FLEX POSTS
1'
10' 10' 3' 8'

9.5' 8' 13.5'
1'

REFUGE PER
DETAIL G, SHEET D2

31.5'

28.5'
R9'
R10.5'
5' 6'
10' 5.5' 8'

5.5' 8'
RED CURB 29.5 LF
RED CURB 64 LF

TYPE VI ARROW
40 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 38
50 LF
1 2 SIZE "STOP" LEGEND 11 SQFT, Typ.

DETAIL 38A 17 LF
1 2 SIZE TYPE IV ARROW 7.5 SQFT
INSTALL W9-1
SIGN ON (N) 12'

PUNCH POST
11' 11' 4' 8'
3'
10' 5' 8'
3'
8'
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1, 20 LF
1" = 30'
0 30 60 C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
62 

2000615
DATE
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
SCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

NOTESREMOVE CONFLICTING (E) STRIPING

FOR ANY CONFLICT WITH BASE BID STRIPING,
ADD. ALT. A STRIPING PREVAILS
S
BID ALT. A. GRAND
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S60
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S58 HI-VIS CROSSWALK 81 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1, 17 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1, 17 LF
DETAIL 22
95 LF
DETAIL 27B
32 LF
10' O.C.

INSTALL RRFB SYSTEM WITH W11-2
and W16-7P SIGNS BACK TO BACK
REMOVE (E) SR4-1, INSTALL RRFB
SYSTEM WITH W11-2 and W16-7P SIGNS

BACK TO BACK ON LUMINAIRE POLE

INSTALL RRFB SYSTEM WITH
W11-2 and W16-7P SIGNS

RELOCATE BUS STOP SIGN

TO NEXT BLOCK SOUTH
INSTALL R1-5 SIGN ON
(N) 12' PUNCH POST
INSTALL W11-2 and W16-9P
SIGNS ON (N) 12' PUNCH POST
INSTALL R6-1(R) SIGN
ON (N) 12' PUNCH POST
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
42 LF
CASE 3 BIKE

LANE PERDETAIL D,
SHEET D152 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1 52 LF
(2) WHITE FLEX POSTS
AND (3) ZICLA ZEBRA PER
DETAIL F, SHEET D2
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1, 57 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1 56 LF
(2) WHITE FLEX
POSTS AND (3)

ZICLA ZEBRA PER
DETAIL F, SHEET D2
N
YIELD LINE 6Δ
RED CURB 17 LF
DETAIL 24
332 LF
DETAIL 24
331 LF
DETAIL 22, 34 LF
(4) 36" YELLOW

FLEX POSTS BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C,
SHEET D1, 72 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL C,
SHEET D1, 115 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL F, SHEET D2
181 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
207 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL F, SHEET D2
135 LF
R8'
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1, 30 LF
INSTALL R3-5(R)

SIGN ON (E)

PUNCH POST
RED CURB 13 LF
INSTALL SR4-1(CA)
SIGN ON (N) 12'

PUNCH POST
8' 10.5' 10' 3'
8' 11'

2.5'
10' 10'
1'

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
294 LF

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
27 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
42 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
116 LF
1'
10'

2.5'

INSTALL
R2-1(35) SIGN

ON (E) PUNCH
POST

HI-VIS CROSSWALK
37 LF
(3) WHITE FLEX POSTS
(2) ZICLA ZEBRA PER DETAIL B, SHEET D1
REFUGE
PER

DETAIL G,
SHEET D2
3' 10' 5' 8' 3' 8.5'
3'
1" = 30'
0 30 60

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
63 

2000615
DATE
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
SCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE:

SHEET TITLE:

DATE:CITY SPECIFICATION NO.

NOTESREMOVE CONFLICTING (E) STRIPING

FOR ANY CONFLICT WITH BASE BID STRIPING,
ADD. ALT. A STRIPING PREVAILS
S
BID ALT. A. GRAND
MAY 2024

SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S61
SEE

MATCHLINE
SHEET S59
CASE 1 BIKE LANE

PER DETAIL D,
CASE 1 BIKE LANE SHEET D1, 17 LF

PER DETAIL D,
SHEET D1, 50 LF
RED CURB 141 LF

RELOCATED BUS

STOP SIGN
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1 57 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL
D, SHEET D1 54 LF
(2) WHITE FLEX POSTS AND (3)

ZICLA ZEBRA PER DETAIL F,
SHEET D2
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
88 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1 52 LF
CASE 1 BIKE LANE PER DETAIL D, SHEET D1 56 LF
(2) WHITE FLEX POSTS AND
(3) ZICLA ZEBRA PER DETAIL F, SHEET D2
CASE 2 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
88 LF
CASE 3 BIKE LANE PER
DETAIL D, SHEET D1
52 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
74 LF
N
RED CURB 41 LF
DETAIL 22
23 LF
DETAIL 24
260 LF DETAIL 24, 260 LF
DETAIL 22
12 LF

RED CURB
56 LF
RED CURB 104 LF

TYPE IV ARROW
15 SQFT, Typ.

YIELD LINE
15 Δ
DETAIL 22, 107 LF
DETAIL 27B, 54 LF
(4) 36" YELLOW FLEX POSTS BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL F, SHEET D2 13 LF

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL C, SHEET D1
30 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
115 LF INSTALL STREET NAME SIGNS ON (E) PUNCH POST

9.5' 8' 10'

1.5'
8' 11' 10'
1' 2.5'
10'

7.5'
3'
8' 5' 10' 3'

BIKE BUFFER PER
DETAIL F, SHEET D2
105 LF
BIKE BUFFER PER DETAIL F, SHEET D2, 108 LF
BIKE BUFFER PERDETAIL C, SHEET D1
152 LF
1'
10'
2'
15' 8' 12'
1" = 30'
0 30 60

C I V I L
BRIA N A . NELSON
No. C 79870
64 

2000615
DATE
BN
WBH
KH
NGN
ROADWAY SEALING 2024
SCALE:APPROVED BY:CHECKED BY:DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:SHEET NO. of
PROJECT TITLE: