Public Services. The FEIR did not identify any significant impacts related to this issue. Increased demand for police and fire services (Impacts PS-1 and PS-2) were found to be significant but mitigable with the payment of required fees to offset potential impacts, and in the case of impacts to law enforcement, the creation of a Security Plan for the ARDP. The modified phasing would still be subject to the same mitigation requirements. No increase in severity of impacts or new mitigation measures would be required. An interim fire station will be constructed within the Avila Ranch project by the occupancy of the 361st residential unit (50% buildout), consistent with the original 2017 FEIR project description. Phasing does not impact the timing of the interim fire station construction.
Impacts related to schools and public parks (Impacts PS-3 and PS-4) were found to be less than significant. Neighborhood parks are included in each phase of the development and will be built in conjunction with housing in each phase. Impacts would remain less than significant.
Transportation and Traffic. The FEIR identified the following significant transportation impacts that could be affected by an increase in population or housing:
TRANS-1. Short-term construction traffic.
TRANS-2. Transportation deficiencies.
TRANS-3. Turning movement conflicts and intersections and driveways. TRANS-4. Transportation volume threshold exceedances on certain roads. TRANS-5. Buckley/227 Operation.
TRANS-6. South Street/Higuera impacts.
TRANS-7. S. Higuera intersections impacts.
TRANS-8. LOVR intersections.
TRANS-10. Pedestrian level of service.
TRANS-11. Bicycle facility demand.
TRANS-12. Transit demand.
TRANS-13. Near-term Buckley/227 Operation.
TRANS-14. Near-term bike and pedestrian facility demand. TRANS-15. Cumulative impacts to intersections.
Some of these impacts were found to be significant and unavoidable, including those related to the operation of the intersection of Buckley Road/SR 227 (Impacts TRANS-5 and TRANS-13).
All other impacts were all found to be significant but mitigable, either through the payment of appropriate fees toward future improvements, or by making some of those roadway improvements directly as requirements of project approval. These improvements are programmed into the approved Development Agreement for the project. The impact to operations on US 101 (Impact TRANS-9) was found to be less than significant.
A Phase 4/5 Transportation Analysis, dated May 9, 2025, prepared by Central Coast Transportation Consulting (CCTC) and reviewed by City staff, shows that the modified development phasing plan would not change any of the conclusions or required mitigation measures described in the FEIR at project buildout. That memorandum concludes that no new transportation impacts would occur, nor would any new or modified mitigation measures be
required. The CCTC Transportation Analysis evaluates vehicle trips for Phases 4 and 5 in order to determine timing of on- and off-site improvement mitigation measures related to each phase.
The original project approvals included several transportation infrastructure improvements that were required to be constructed prior to or in conjunction with Phase 4 of the development. With approval of the Phase 5 Final Map and proposal to advance Phase 5 construction ahead of Phase 4, the following modifications and clarifications to required timing of transportation improvements are incorporated with this Addendum and with the DA Memorandum of Agreement:
1. Timing of Mitigation Measure TRANS-4 and Condition of Approval #106: Horizon Lane Improvements (Suburban Road to Avila Ranch Project Boundary) Previous Approval: Per Mitigation Measure TRANS-4 and Condition of Approval #106, the Developer is required to construct/improve Horizon Road between Suburban Lane and the project boundary to City Engineering Standards for a commercial collector street, with designs completed prior to Phase 4 Final Map recordation, construction initiation prior to issuance of Phase 4 building permits, and construction completion prior to issuance of occupancy permits for the 100th residential unit of Phase 4 development.
Timing Clarification: No modifications proposed. Advancing Phase 5 ahead of Phase 4 does not trigger the need for the Horizon Lane improvements between Suburban Road and the project boundary prior to Phase 4. A Transportation Analysis Memorandum has been prepared by Central Coast Transportation Consulting, which confirms that no transportation impacts are anticipated by advancing Phase 5 prior to Phase 4 without the Horizon Lane improvements in place. Phase 5 is located on the south side of the development, adjacent to Buckley Road, and it is expected that Phase 5 traffic would predominantly use Buckley Road since this route provides a shorter path than a route northward through the rest of the development via slower speed roads. No increase in severity of impacts or new mitigation measures would be required. Impacts would remain less than significant with existing mitigation and modified phasing.
2. Timing of Mitigation Measure TRANS-4 and Condition of Approval #102: Suburban Road Improvements (Earthwood to Horizon/Jespersen)
Previous Approval: Per Mitigation Measure TRANS-4 and Condition of Approval #102, the Developer is required to improve Suburban Road between Earthwood Lane and Horizon/Jespersen Road to City Engineering Standards for a commercial collector street, with design and construction initiation prior to issuance of 1st building permits for Phase 4, and construction completion prior to issuance of occupancy permits for the 100th residential unit of Phase 4 development and prior to the connection of Horizon Lane with the project site.
Timing Clarification: No modifications proposed. Advancing Phase 5 ahead of Phase 4 does not trigger the need for the Suburban Road improvements east of Earthwood
prior to Phase 4, as development is not anticipated to add traffic to this segment of Suburban until Phase 4 development and extension of Horizon Lane between Suburban and Avila Ranch. A Transportation Analysis Memorandum has been prepared by Central Coast Transportation Consulting, which confirms that no transportation impacts are anticipated by advancing Phase 5 prior to Phase 4 without the Horizon Lane improvements in place. No increase in severity of impacts or new mitigation measures would be required. Impacts would remain less than significant with existing mitigation and modified phasing.
3. Timing of Condition of Approval #107: Buckley Road Frontage Improvements Previous Approval: Per the 2017 FEIR project description and Condition of Approval #107, the Developer is required to construct frontage improvements along Buckley Road from the Tank Farm Creek Bridge to the eastern site boundary, including addition of on-street Class II bike lanes/shoulders on both sides of the street, and an off-street Class I shared-use path on the north side of Buckley Road. As required by Condition of Approval #107, improvements are required to be designed prior to issuance of building permits for Phase 4 and construction completed prior to issuance of occupancy permits for the 50th residential unit of Phase 4. Timing Modification: Design of Buckley Road frontage improvements shall be required prior to issuance of any building permits for Phase 4 or Phase 5, whichever comes first. Construction shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permits for the 50th cumulative residential unit with Phase 4 or Phase 5. No changes are needed to the FEIR project description for implementation. This timing modification is reflected in the Avila Ranch Development Agreement Memorandum of Agreement and the Transportation Improvement Phasing Plan. No increase in severity of impacts or new mitigation measures would be required. Impacts would remain less than significant with modified phasing.
4. Timing of Mitigation Measure TRANS-11 and Condition of Approval #109: Buckley Road Bicycle Bridges
Previous Approval: Per project Mitigation Measure TRANS-11 and Condition of Approval #109, the Developer is required to construct two bicycle bridges over Tank Farm Creek located north and south of Buckley Road. Construction of both bridges was originally required prior to Phase 2. With previous Council approval of the Phase 2-3 Final Map (Resolution No. 11472), the required timing for construction of the bicycle bridge south of Buckley Road was modified to coincide with the Buckley Road frontage improvements with Phase 4 in order to minimize construction impacts on properties to the south where a construction easement and right-of-way acquisition is needed. The northern bicycle bridge remains a requirement with Phase 2. The First FEIR Addendum was prepared with the Phase 2-3 Final Map approval, which can be reviewed along with additional discussion on the modified timing of Mitigation Measure TRANS-11 in the January 23, 2024, City Council Agenda Report packet.
Timing Modification: Construction of the bicycle bridge over Tank Farm Creek south of Buckley Road shall be required prior to issuance of occupancy permits for for the 50th occupancy permit for Phase 4 or Phase 5, whichever occurs first. As noted above, traffic from Phase 5 is expected to utilize Buckley Road to access the site, and therefore will increase traffic on Buckley. This timing modification to tie Buckley improvements to either Phase 4 or Phase 5, whichever comes first, is intended to ensure that the timing of construction of the south bicycle bridge remains consistent with previous City Council approvals, even if Phase 5 is advanced ahead of Phase 4.
No increase in severity of impacts or new mitigation measures would be required.
Impacts would remain less than significant with existing mitigation and modified phasing.
5. Timing of Condition of Approval #110: Jespersen/Venture and Jespersen/Wright Brothers Roundabouts
Previous Approval: The 2017 FEIR project description identifies single lane roundabouts at the Jespersen/Venture and Jespersen/Wright Brothers intersections to provide internal circulation connecting the east and west sides of the project across Tank Farm Creek and providing secondary project access to Buckley Road. Per Condition of Approval #110, design of Jespersen/Venture and Jespersen/Wright Brothers roundabouts is required to be substantially complete prior to recordation of the Phase 4 Final Map and construction shall be complete prior to issuance of building permits for Phase 4.
Timing Modification: Design of the roundabouts shall be substantially complete prior to recordation of Phase 4 or Phase 5 Final Map, whichever comes first, and construction shall be completed prior to issuance of any building permits for Phase 4 or Phase 5 residential units. This timing modification is reflected in the Development Agreement Memorandum of Agreement and the Transportation Improvement Phasing Plan. No increase in severity of impacts or new mitigation measures would be required. Impacts would remain less than significant with modified phasing.
Therefore, with this Addendum, Mitigation Measure TRANS-11 (Buckley Road South Bicycle Bridge) is modified from Phase 4 to Phase 4 or 5 (whichever comes sooner), and the Horizon Lane and Suburban Road Improvements remain required with Phase 4 per Mitigation Measure TRANS-4 and are not triggered/warranted if Phase 5 is advanced ahead of Phase 4. A Memorandum of Agreement has been prepared to reflect these timing clarifications. As required by Mitigation Measure TRANS-2, a Transportation Improvement Phasing Plan has been prepared to graphically reflect the timing of major on- and off-site transportation improvements by phase as currently proposed for construction. No increase in severity of impacts or new mitigation measures would be required. Impacts would remain less than significant with existing mitigation and modified phasing.
Utilities. The FEIR did not identify any significant impacts related to this issue. Impacts related wastewater collection (Impact UT-1) were found to be less than significant. Increased demand for utility infrastructure (Impact UT-2) was found to be significant but mitigable with a variety of mitigation measures to offset potential impacts, including city review and approval of
infrastructure plans. The modified phasing plan would still be subject to the same mitigation requirements as each phase develops. Fair share mitigation and development impact fees are paid by the project Developer as each phase is constructed. All backbone utility infrastructure, including main sewer lines, water lines, and the sewer lift station, have already been installed.
Reimbursement agreements are in place for oversized infrastructure. No increase in severity of impacts or new mitigation measures would be required.
DETERMINATION
In accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of San Luis Obispo has determined that this Addendum to the certified Final EIR is necessary to document changes or additions that have occurred since the Final EIR was originally certified. The changes proposed would not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous Final EIR was adopted has been identified.
The preparation of a subsequent environmental document is not necessary because:
1. None of the circumstances included in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines have occurred which require a subsequent environmental document:
a. The project changes do not result in new or substantially more severe environmental impacts.
b. The circumstances under which the project is undertaken will not require major changes to the IS/MND.
c. The modified project does not require any substantive changes to previously approved mitigation measures.
2. The changes are consistent with City General Plan goals and polices that promote provision of additional housing within the City.
The City has reviewed and considered the information contained in this Addendum and finds that the preparation of subsequent CEQA analysis that would require public circulation is not necessary. This Addendum does not require circulation because it does not provide significant new information that changes the adopted Final EIR in a way that deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse environmental effect of the project or a feasible way to mitigate or avoid such an effect. The City shall consider this Addendum with the certified Final EIR as part of the basis for potential approval of on- and offsite subdivision improvements for the Avila Ranch Project.
Attachment 1: Avila Ranch Phase 4/5 Transportation Analysis, May 9, 2025 Attachment 2: Avila Ranch Transportation Improvement Phasing Plan & Off-Site Construction Requirements Phases 3 to 6, May 8, 2025
(805) 316-0101
895 Napa Avenue, Suite A-6, Morro Bay, CA 93442
MEMORANDUM
Date: July 16, 2025
To: Dan Garson, WCP Developers
From: Joe Fernandez and Michelle Matson, CCTC
Subject: Avila Ranch Phase 4/5/6 Analysis
Avila Ranch seeks to advance Phases 5 and 6 of the development prior to Phase 4. The project’s Transportation Impact Study (TIS, CCTC, 2016) recommended roadway connections so volumes would remain within the Circulation Element’s daily volume thresholds. This memorandum evaluates the proposed phasing change as it relates to these thresholds and other identified project impacts.
BACKGROUND
Venture Drive and Earthwood Lane near the project are evaluated in the TIS as residential collectors, with a daily volume threshold of 3,000 daily vehicles in the Circulation Element. The TIS (page 39) notes that Venture Drive and Earthwood Lane could exceed these daily volume thresholds upon occupancy of Phase 4. The TIS recommends that the project complete the Horizon Lane/Jesperson Road connection to the north prior to Phase 4 to spread traffic so that volumes remain below the thresholds.
The project proposes to construct Horizon Lane/Jesperson Road from Venture Drive to Buckley Road for Phases 5 and 6 access. The Horizon Lane/Jesperson Road connection to Suburban Road and improvements to Suburban Road east of Earthwood Lane are proposed following Phases 5 and 6, prior to Phase 4 conditions for design (tied to building permits) and construction (tied to occupancy of the 100th unit).
ANALYSIS
Combined, Phases 1, 2, and 3 would generate approximately 2,500 daily trips which would be distributed to the local roadways as shown in the image below from the TIS (page 44).
Avila Ranch Phasing Change –Transportation Analysis 2
Central Coast Transportation Consulting July 16, 2025
With Phases 1, 2, and 3, Earthwood Lane is forecast to carry 1,306 daily vehicles from the project, while Venture Drive is forecast to carry a maximum of 1,314 daily vehicles from the project. Through traffic would increase these volumes, but these flows are expected to be negligible now that the Buckley Road extension is complete.
Accordingly, more than 1,500 additional daily trips would be needed to trigger the Circulation Element thresholds on these roadways.
Phase 4 would generate 1,195 daily vehicle trips, with 992 daily trips assigned to Venture Drive as shown on the image below (Appendix G of the TIS).
Phase 5 would generate 1,098 daily vehicle trips and Phase 6 would generate 1,979 daily vehicle trips. The image below (Appendix G of the TIS) shows the daily traffic volumes with Phases 1-6. The highest volume is on Venture Drive west of Horizon Road/Jesperson Road, where 3,980 daily vehicles are forecast with Phases 1-
6. Without Phase 4 this would be reduced by 992 vehicles for a total 2,988 daily vehicles, below the Circulation Element threshold.
Avila Ranch Phasing Change –Transportation Analysis 3
Central Coast Transportation Consulting July 16, 2025
Phase 4 is located near the north end of the Avila Ranch development, so the shortest path for those trips to and from destinations to the north would be via Earthwood Lane and Venture Drive. Phases 5 and 6 are located on the south side of the development, adjacent to Buckley Road. Phases 5 and 6 traffic would predominantly use Buckley Road since this route provides a shorter path than a route through the rest of the development via slower speed roads.
Similarly, Phases 5 and 6 traffic would not use the segment of Suburban Road east of Earthwood Lane, so the improvements this segment of Suburban Road are not required as a part of Phases 5 and 6.
The addition of Phases 5 and 6 traffic to Phases 1, 2, and 3, would not exceed the Circulation Element thresholds.
CONCLUSIONS
Advancing Phases 5 and 6 so that they are built prior to Phase 4 would not trigger the extension of Horizon Lane/Jesperson Road to Suburban Road since Phase 5 and 6 traffic will primarily use Buckley Road instead of Earthwood Lane and Venture Drive and volumes would remain below Circulation Element thresholds.
Similarly, Phases 5 and 6 would not trigger improvements to Suburban Road east of Earthwood Lane.
This change to the project phasing would not trigger any new improvements since the Buckley Road extension and Vachel Lane turn restrictions are in place, and the supporting bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure is complete or underway.
Please let us know if you have any questions.
ATTACHMENT B
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
6RXWKZRRG'ULYH
6DQ/XLV2ELVSR&$
3)
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
6RXWKZRRG'ULYH
6DQ/XLV2ELVSR&$
3)
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
6RXWKZRRG'ULYH
6DQ/XLV2ELVSR&$
3)
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
1050 Southwood Drive
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401P 805.544.7407 F 805.544.3863
TRACT 3089 PHASING PLAN
AVILA RANCH PARK LAYOUT
PHASE 2-3 PARKS
Lot Number on Tract Map
Acrea
ge presented to PRC
Acrea
ge shown on tract map
Park E 326 0.81 0.82 Park D 330 0.38 0.99 Total 1.19 1.81 Other parks shown on exhibit are in phases other than 2-3.
PRC = Parks and Recreation Commission
612 CLARION COURT
www.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES ®
1 14 OF SHEETS
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, HEREBY STATE THAT WE ARE ALL THE OWNERS OF, AND ALL
RECORD HOLDERS OF SECURITY INTEREST IN, AND ALL PARTIES HAVING ANYRECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE REAL PROPERTY INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION
AND PROJECT SHOWN ON THIS MAP, AND THAT EACH OF US DOES HEREBY CONSENT TO THE FILING AND RECORDATION OF THIS MAP.THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES: YEAGER COURT, WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY, EARHART WAY,DOOLITTLE DRIVE, COLEMAN LANE, JESPERSON ROAD, VENTURE DRIVE AND HUGHESLANE AND ALSO THE EASEMENTS FOR STREET TREES, BICYCLE TRAIL, ABUTMENTS
AND FOOTINGS, PEDESTRIAN ACCESS, DRAINAGE, SANITARY SEWER, AND WATER DESIGNATED AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP.
WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE PUBLIC FOR PUBLIC USE AND THE BENEFIT OF THE SEVERAL PUBLIC UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH ARE AUTHORIZED TO SERVE IN SAIDSUBDIVISION AS DELINEATED ON THIS MAP AS PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT OR "P.U.E.".
THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW IS DEDICATED IN FEE SIMPLE:
LOTS 386 AND 426 FOR PUBLIC PARK PURPOSES.LOTS 434, 438, AND 439 FOR OPEN SPACE PURPOSES.LOT 435 FOR OPEN SPACE AND AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES.
WE HEREBY RESERVE TO OURSELVES, OUR HEIRS, AND ASSIGNS THE PRIVATE
RECIPROCAL VEHICLE ACCESS, PEDESTRIAN ACCESS, LANDSCAPE, WATER, SEWER
AND HOME OWNER'S ASSOCIATION (HOA) LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION AND
MAINTENANCE EASEMENTS FOR THE USE AND THE BENEFIT OF PRESENT AND
FUTURE OWNERS OF LOTS AFFECTED BY SUCH EASEMENTS DELINEATED ON THIS MAP. WE ALSO HEREBY RESERVE TO OURSELVES, OUR HEIRS, AND ASSIGNS THEPRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF THE PRESENT OR
FUTURE OWNERS OF THE LOTS AFFECTED BY SUCH EASEMENTS AS DELINEATED ON SAID MAP.
MRP CALIFORNIA, LLC,
A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,
DOING BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA AS MILLROSE CALIFORNIA HOLDINGS, LLCBY: ___________________________________________________NAME:
TITLE: AUTHORIZED AGENT
OWNER'S STATEMENT
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
AIRPORT
BUCKLEY RD
TANK FARM RD S HIGUERA ST
227
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, CLERK OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, HEREBY STATE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE AFORESAID CITY DID ON THE ________DAY OF ________,20___, APPROVE THE MAP OF TRACT NO. 3089 PHASE 5 SHOWN HEREON IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND AGREE TO ACCEPT ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC EASEMENTS UPON COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY:FOR STREET PURPOSES, YEAGER COURT, WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY, EARHART WAY, DOOLITTLE DRIVE, COLEMAN LANE, JESPERSON ROAD, VENTURE DRIVE AND HUGHES LANE DELINEATED ON THIS MAP.
THE STREET TREE EASEMENTS, THE BICYCLE TRAIL EASEMENT, THE ABUTMENTS AND FOOTINGS EASEMENT, THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, SANITARY SEWEREASEMENT, AND WATER EASEMENT SO DESIGNATED ON THIS MAP.
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS OR "PUE" DELINEATED ON THIS MAP FOR PUBLIC USE AND THE BENEFIT OF THE SEVERAL PUBLIC UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH ARE AUTHORIZED TO SERVE IN SAID SUBDIVISION.
WE AGREE TO ACCEPT THE REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED BELOW DEDICATED IN FEE SIMPLE UPON COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY:
LOTS 386 AND 426 FOR PUBLIC PARK PURPOSES.LOTS 434, 438, AND 439 FOR OPEN SPACE PURPOSES.LOT 435 FOR OPEN SPACE AND AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES. ________________________________
TERESA PURRINGTON, CITY CLERK ___________________________ CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO DATED:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT
THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED UPON A
FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION
MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF ADRIENNE BURNS ON MARCH 3, 2021. I HEREBY STATE THAT ALL THE MONUMENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND
OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED OR THAT THEY WILL BE SET IN THOSE POSITIONS
WITHIN ONE YEAR FROM RECORDATION OF THIS MAP, AND THAT THE MONUMENTS
ARE, OR WILL BE, SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED, AND THAT THIS FINAL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE CONDITIONALLY APPROVEDTENTATIVE MAP. ______________________________
CLAYTON L. BRADSHAW LS 8298
DATED:
FOR REVIEW
PHASE 5 OF MULTIPLE PHASES
IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF
THE AGREEMENT DECLARATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SLO AL 18-0013 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2018-025711 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE,
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA.
TRACT MAP NO. 3089
PHASE 5
No. 8298
CITY ENGINEER'S STATEMENT
I, GABRIEL MUNOZ-MORRIS, ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP. THAT THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON IS SUBSTANTIALLY
THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE MAP AND ANY ALTERATIONS THEREOF, AND THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH. ____________________________________________________
GABRIEL MUNOZ-MORRIS, R.C.E. 87574 DATE
SUPERVISING CIVIL ENGINEER
I, DOUGLAS A. RION, ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, AS ALLOWED UNDER SECTION 66416.5 (C) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, DO HEREBY STATE
THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE MAP SHOWN HEREON AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT.
____________________________________________
DOUGLAS A. RION, LS 8546 DATE
ACTING CITY SURVEYOR
FILED THIS ______ DAY OF __________, 20_____, AT ________ __.M. IN BOOK ______ OF MAPS, AT PAGE ______, AT THE REQUEST OF CLAYTON L. BRADSHAW.DOCUMENT NO ______________ FEE : $____________ ________________________
COUNTY RECORDER BY:___________________________
DEPUTY
COUNTY RECORDER'S STATEMENT
SIGNATURE OMISSIONS
THE SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING HAVE BEEN OMITTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 66436 (a)-(3)-(A) OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AS THEIR INTEREST IS SUCH THAT
IT SHOULD NOT RIPEN INTO FEE TITLE, AND SAID SIGNATURES ARE NOT REQUIRED BY THE GOVERNING BODY.
EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY PER BOOK 2593, PAGE 706 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
DIOPTICS MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, AN INCIDENTAL RIGHTS
OF INGRESS AND EGRESS TO THE EXTENT NECESSARY TO USE THE WELL AND PIPELINE
EASEMENT, WHICH ARE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE EXTERIOR BOUNDARY OF THIS MAP, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 2003-126916 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
UNKNOWN PERSONS, AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS PER DOCUMENT NUMBER 2001-014104 AND MODIFICATION THEREOF PER DOCUMENT NUMBER 2012-036861 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, AN AVIGATION EASEMENT PER INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-004691 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
TITLE REPORT NO. O.R.T.C. 1421003960PA-DB FEBRUARY 21, 2025 RECORDER'S DISCLAIMER:
THE TABULATION, LISTING AND NUMBERING OF ANY SEPARATE DOCUMENTS AUTHORIZED TO BE RECORDED CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS MAP HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BY THE SUBDIVIDER OR BY THELOCAL AGENCY APPROVING THE MAP. THE COUNTY RECORDER MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONSREGARDING THE ACCURACY OF THE TABULATION, LISTING AND NUMBERING OF ANY SEPARATEDOCUMENTS REFERRED TO ON THE MAP.NOTE: THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS AFFECTING THE PROPERTY DENOTED HEREON ARE BEINGRECORDED CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH;
1. GRANT DEED PER INSTRUMENT NO. ___________________________________________________________________________
2. OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT (BUCKLEY ROAD) PER INSTRUMENT NO. __________________________________
3. OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES PER INSTRUMENT NO. ________________________________________________
4. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT PER INSTRUMENT NO. ____________________________________________
5. PRIVATE STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM AGREEMENT PER INSTRUMENT NO. ________________________________________
6. DECLARATION OF ANNEXATION PER INSTRUMENT NO. _________________________________________________________________
7. PRIVATE ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT (NC) PER INSTRUMENT NO. ______________________________________________________
8. PRIVATE STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM AGREEMENT (NC) PER INSTRUMENT NO. _____________________________________
612 CLARION COURT
www.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES ®
2 14 OF SHEETS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A NOTARY PUBLIC OR OTHER OFFICER COMPLETING THIS
CERTIFICATE VERIFIES ONLY THE IDENTITY OF THE
INDIVIDUAL WHO SIGNED THE DOCUMENT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE IS ATTACHED, AND NOT THE TRUTHFULNESS,
ACCURACY, OR VALIDITY OF THAT DOCUMENT
TRACT MAP NO. 3089
PHASE 5
SOILS REPORT
SOILS ENGINEERING REPORT UPDATE
AVILA RANCH DEVELOPMENT PHASE II-VI, BUCKLEY ROAD ANDVACHELL LANE PROJECT: SL09304-10DATED: JANUARY 26, 2022PREPARED FOR: AVILA RANCH DEVELOPERS. INC.PREPARED BY: GEOSOLUTIONS, INC. 1021 TAMA LANE, SUITE 105
SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA 93454
(805) 614-6333
PHASE 5 OF MULTIPLE PHASES
IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF
THE AGREEMENT DECLARATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SLO AL 18-0013 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2018-025711 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE,
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF _____________________________
ON ___________________, 2025, BEFORE ME, ______________________________________________ (INSERT NAME AND TITLE OF THE OFFICER)
PERSONALLY APPEARED ____________________________________________________, WHO PROVED
TO ME ON THE BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON(S) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE
SUBSCRIBED TO THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE/SHE/THEY
EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR
SIGNATURE(S) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED THE INSTRUMENT.
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
WITNESS MY HAND
___________________________________________
SIGNATURE
NAME OF NOTARY PRINTED ________________________________ COUNTY OF PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS _________________________COMMISSION EXPIRATION DATE _______________
1. AVIGATION EASEMENT OVER ALL OF TRACT 3089 PHASE 5 FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PER DOC#2019004691
EXISTING EASEMENT
99 121.31FD 5RB YPC BEN RCE 1???5 DN 1.0
132114.17FD 2IN BC CR-10 AVERAGED POSITION
147105.53FD 1.25IP YPC ILL DN 2.0 023-CR-107
C LS 5139 DN .4 023-CR-107
149120.76FD 2BC LS 5139 023-CR-107
169122.56FD RB YPC ILL TAC AC RTK TREE
172114.96FD 1.25IP ID NT LS 3982 DN .6
173115.58
FD 5RB BEN RCE 12545
174116.45
FD .75IP ID RCE 9425 DN 1.1
176
0.00 FD 5RB BEN RCE 12545 YPC
178121.40
FD 1.25IP ID NT RCE 9425DN 1.0
180114.14FD 1.5IP LS 3982
181114.34
FD 5RB NO CAP 100-RS-014
182115.99FD 5RB EDA LS 5693 UP 0.2 100-RS-014
181 315.71 FD 5RB BEN RCE 12545 184 115.40 FD 3BC UNION LS 2019 1070103.75
FD 5RB 4283 RPC
1086116.17FD 5RB 6192 OPC DN 0.7
FD 5/8" REBAR CAPPED PER RCE 12545 (R7), HELD FORPOINT ON NORTH LINE OF BUCKLEY ROAD N 1°29'01" E
20.00' FROM CENTERLINE INTERSECTION
#
#
FD 3.5" BRASS CAP INSCRIBED "U.O. NO.
11 RHJ LS 2019" IN CONCRETE (R6)
60.00' PRIVATE ROAD
EASEMENT PER
DOC#2001-014104
15.00' SOCAL GAS
EASEMENT PER 2593/OR/706
439
110.96
FD5RBLS7561
440
110.51FD5RBLS7561
FD 5/8 " REBAR WITH CAP
TAGGED RCE 12545 (R7)
S 1° 29' 01" W 1998.39' M
S 0° 08' 07" W 1998.48' (R3)
CITY-L
CITY-L CITY-L
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L
SNF (R3). HELD RECORD DISTANCE
OF 20.00' ALONG PROLONGATION
SEE DETAIL 4B, SHEET 4
SEE DETAIL 4A, SHEET 4
N 77°15'53" E 103.03' M
N 77°15'53" E [103.55'](R1)
N 56°55'29" E [321.07'] M&(R1)
N 38°53'59" E [206.27'] M&(R1) N 53°09'19" E [246.33'] M&(R1) N 11°35'26" E [154.29'] M&(R1)
N 42°29'15" E [294.56'] M&(R1)
S 70°47'31" E 436.23' M&(R2)
N 59°45'25" E 65.56' M&(R2)
N 11°13'10" E 273.26' M&(R2)
N 43°28'12" E 401.65' M&(R2)
N 1°37'01" E 601.54' M&(R2)
S 88°32'08" E 54.75' M
N 88°42'07" W [54.74'] (R1)
N 88°38'54" E 161.73' M
N 88°41'58 W 161.81' (R5)
14.64' 147.09'
S 1°19'47" W 231.84'
S 6°47'40" E 159.26'
S 1°19'46" W 194.95'
S 33°03'21" E 307.79'
L=137.85', R=295.00',
Δ=26°46'27"
S 12°26'33" E 48.80' S 88° 42' 44" E 1319.38' M S 89°56'32" W 1319.50' (R3) FD 5/8" REBAR WITH ORANGEPLASTIC CAP LS 6192 DOWN 0.7' (R5) FD 2.5" BRASS DISK IN CONCRETE TAGGED "SLO CO CR. 10 R-78" IN CONCRETE, ACCEPTED FOR BRASS DISK"SLO CO" PER (R1), HELD FOR POINT ON NORTH LINE OF BUCKLEY ROAD, N 1°37'01" E 20.00' FROM CENTERLINE INTERSECTION
BUCKLEY ROAD
N 1°37'01" E 1978.73' M&(R2)
N 82°27'13" E 229.10' M&(R2)
L=182.73', R=330.00',
Δ=31°43'35"
N 88° 22' 25" W
N 1° 37' 01" E 42.83'
58.32'
N 1° 37' 01" E
20.00'
SEE DETAIL 4C, SHEET 4
FD 5/8" REBAR WITH
CAP RCE 12545 (R2).
N 88° 42' 44" W 1319.34' M
N 88°42'48" W [1319.40'] (R1)
N 83° 43' 07" W
40' DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT RADIAL
FROM WILLIAM BUCKLEY, ET AL TO COUNTY
OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PER R9
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES ®
3 14 OF SHEETS
0 BOUNDARY SHEET
FD 5/8" REBAR CAPPED RCE
12545 PER (R7), MONUMENT
#4 ON DETAIL 4C, SHEET 4
DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE
PT#8109
PT#8091 N 76° 51' 47" E 10,889.07'
N 16° 56' 51" E 3,642.14'
BASIS OF BEARINGS
BASIS OF BEARINGS
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS THE BEARING BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO'S JANUARY 2007 HORIZONTAL CONTROL NETWORK POINT #8109 AND POINT #8091, BEARING BEING NORTH 76°51'47" EAST CALCULATED FROM (R4). FOUND #8109 IS A BRASS
SCREW IN CONCRETE IN MONUMENT WELL AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF LAS PRADERAS AND MARIPOSA/CHUPARROSA STREETS, NORTHING: 2286220.263' EASTING:
5762972.262'. FOUND #8091 IS A PIN IN CONCRETE IN A MONUMENT WELL AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF INDUSTRIAL WAY AND SACRAMENTO STREETS, NORTHING: 2288695.139' EASTING: 5773576.358'. CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM ZONE 5, 1991.35 EPOCH ADJUSTMENT OF THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983.
DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON, ARE GRID DISTANCES. TO CALCULATE GROUND DISTANCES DIVIDE THE DISTANCES SHOWN BY THE COMBINATION FACTOR 0.9999585868 TRACT MAP NO. 3089 PHASE 5
N 35° 12' 37" E
2,384.57'
N 63° 50 50" E 9,099.08'
FD 5/8" REBAR WITH CAP RCE 12545 PER (R2)
BEING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PROJECT
PHASE 5 OF MULTIPLE PHASES
IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF
THE AGREEMENT DECLARATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SLO AL 18-0013 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2018-025711 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE,
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA.
FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
SET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED INTO THE STREET 0.20' FROM THE TRUE CORNER, SEE DETAIL 10B ON SHEET 10 FOR OFFSET
INFORMATION
SET 1" IRON PIPE CAPPED LS 8298, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDSET 2.5" BRASS CAP INSCRIBED LS 8298 IN STANDARD CITY
CENTERLINE MONUMENT WELL
M MEASURED
RAD RADIALR1 041/MB/048, DISTANCES REDUCE TO GRIDR2 TRACT 3089 PHASES 2 & 3, SURVEY IN PROGRESSR3 076/RS/006R4 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO HORIZONTAL CONTROL NETWORK (2007)R5 028/CR/084R6 002/RS/055R7 081/RS/032R8 099/RS/044R9 6/DEEDS/49 LEGEND
NOTE: THE SCALE FACTOR SHOWN ON R1 IS INCORRECT. R1 DISTANCES IN BRACKETS [ ] ARE REDUCED TO GRID, USING THE CORRECT SCALE FACTOR OF 0.999942147.
TRACT BOUNDARY
CITY-L CITY LIMITS
WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY
S 10° 03' 39" E
57.84' L=59.48', R=112.87'
Δ=30° 11' 28"
S 33° 00' 10" E
6.25'
L=6.39', R=32.87'
Δ=11° 07' 46"
L=63.90', R=92.87'
Δ=39° 25' 24"
S 89° 11' 42" W
35.27'
L=22.91', R=179.13'
Δ=7° 19' 45"
N 83° 28' 33" W
28.09'
S 59° 18' 30" W
10.65'
S 88° 03' 48" W
57.83'
L=48.23', R=112.88'
Δ=24° 28' 49"
L=18.33', R=32.87'
Δ=31° 57' 07"
L=52.58', R=92.87'
Δ=32° 26' 10"
S 0° 48' 19" E
35.27'
L=22.91', R=179.12'
Δ=7° 19' 45"
S 6° 31' 26" W
26.99'
S 88° 03' 48" W
54.64'
S 1° 19' 47" W
48.00'
N 56° 28' 45" W
11.08'
N 88° 40' 13" W
17.72'
S 1° 19' 46" W
194.95'
S 6° 47' 40" E
159.26'
#1
N 56°55'29" E 321.07' M
N 56°55'29" E [321.06'](R1)
SNF (R3). HELD RECORD DISTANCE OF 20.00' ALONG PROLONGATION
15.00' SOCAL GAS EASEMENT
PER 2593/OR/706
S 88° 42' 44" E 392.42'
BUCKLEY ROAD
N 77°15'53" E 103.03' M
N 77°15'53" E [103.55'](R1) N 88°42'44" W 1711.81' M
N 89°55' W 1710.6' (R9)
S 82°57'56" W 199.35' M
S 81°38' W 199.2' (R9)
N 88°42'45" W 1319.35' MN 88°42'48" W [1319.40'] (R1)
S 89°56'32" ' W 1319.50' (R3)
N 88°42'45" W 726.36' M
N88°42'48"W [725.89' ](R1)
VACHELL LANE
40' DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT FROM WILLIAM
BUCKLEY, ET AL TO COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PER R9
20' 20' N 88°42'44" W 593.07' M N88°42'48"W [593.51'] CF(R1) N 88°42'44" W 1319.34' M N88°42'48"W [1319.40'] (R1)
63.98'
138.19' N 1° 29' 01" E
20.00' N 1°37'01" E 20.00' M N 1°36'56" E [20.00'] (R1) N 88°42'44" W 1319.39' M S 89°56'32" W 1319.50' R7
SNF (R7). HELD RECORD DISTANCE
OF 20.00' ALONG PROLONGATION
N 87°11'04" W 707.00' M
N 88°31' W 706.5' (R9)
17' 23'
N 0°51'28" E 1982.22' MN 0°29'19" W 1982.42' CF(R8)
#2
#3
#4
#5
40' ROAD DEDICATION
PER 6/DEEDS/49
61.16'
N 88°42'47" W 2618.83' M S 89°56'32"W 2619.00' R2
CITY-L CITY-L
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L C.R. NO. 4
C.R. NO. 8 - 20' NORTH OF SECTION LINE
C.R. NO. 10
20' RIGHT OF WAY PER R7
N 67°47'47" E 25.09' MN 66°30'05" E 25.08' CF(R9)
BB
529.09'
VENTURE DRIVE
S 24° 52' 43" E
6.25'
S 1° 56' 13" E
57.84'
L=48.23', R=112.88'
Δ=24° 28' 50"
L=18.33', R=32.88'
Δ=31° 57' 05"
S 78° 53' 34" E
19.04'
N 66° 23' 36" E
2.45'
L=31.29', R=90.88'
Δ=19° 43' 41"
N 89° 11' 42" E
35.27'
L=22.91', R=179.13'
Δ=7° 19' 40"
S 83° 28' 33" E
29.81'
S 51° 48' 02" E
9.58'
N 88° 03' 48" E
54.64'
N 59° 18' 30" E
10.65'
N 88° 03' 48" E
57.83'
S 75° 37' 38" W
12.33'
L=23.41', R=110.87'
Δ=12° 05' 50"
L=28.97', R=30.88'
Δ=53° 45' 27"
L=20.73', R=90.87'
Δ=13° 04' 20"
S 2° 59' 00" W
19.04'
S 8° 55' 45" E
35.27'
L=22.91', R=179.13'
Δ=7° 19' 45"
S 1° 36' 00" E
26.99'
S 88° 40' 13" E
17.72'
S 1° 19' 47" W
48.00'
S 6° 47' 40" E
159.26'
S 1° 19' 47" W
231.84'
N 30° 45' 05" E
RADIAL
N 11° 01' 24" E
RADIAL
S 0° 48' 13" E
RADIAL
S 87° 06' 02" E
RADIAL
S 8° 10' 25" E
RADIAL
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES ®
4 14 OF SHEETS
BOUNDARY SHEET
TRACT MAP NO. 3089 PHASE 5
PHASE 5 OF MULTIPLE PHASES
IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF
THE AGREEMENT DECLARATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SLO AL 18-0013 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2018-025711 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE,
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA.
DETAIL 4B
SCALE 1" = 40'
SCALE 1" = 50' DETAIL 4C
FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
SET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED INTO THE STREET 0.20' FROM THE TRUE CORNER, SEE DETAIL 10A ON SHEET 10 FOR OFFSET INFORMATION SET 1" IRON PIPE CAPPED LS 8298, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDSET 2.5" BRASS CAP INSCRIBED LS 8298 IN STANDARD CITY CENTERLINE MONUMENT WELLMONUMENT TO BE SET PER R1. NO MONUMENT PRESENT AT TIME OF SURVEY
M MEASUREDBB BEARING/BEARING INTERSECTION
RAD RADIALR1 041/MB/048, DISTANCES REDUCE TO GRIDR2 TRACT 3089 PHASES 2 & 3, SURVEY IN PROGRESSR3 076/RS/006R4 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO HORIZONTAL CONTROL NETWORK (2007)R5 028/CR/084R6 002/RS/055R7 081/RS/032R8 099/RS/044R9 6/DEEDS/49 LEGEND
NOTE: THE SCALE FACTOR SHOWN ON R1 IS INCORRECT. R1 DISTANCES IN BRACKETS [ ] ARE REDUCED TO GRID, USING THE CORRECT SCALE FACTOR OF 0.999942147.
TRACT BOUNDARY
CITY-L CITY LIMITS
SURVEY NOTES:
1. BUCKLEY ROAD IS SHOWN HEREON PER 6/DEEDS/49.
1.a. A CHAINING INDEX HAS BEEN USED AND APPLIED EQUALLY FOR THE THREE COURSES BETWEEN C.R. 10 AND C.R. 4.
1.b. GRANT LINE ADJUSTMENT USED BETWEEN C.R. NO. 8 AND C.R. NO. 4
2. THE CITY LIMITS IS MAPPED PER DOCUMENT NO. 2008032825. SAID
DOCUMENT FOLLOWS THE NORTH LINE OF BUCKLEY ROAD AS SHOWN ON (R3).
DETAIL 4A
SCALE 1" = 40'
MONUMENTS:
#1. FOUND 5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP IN ASPHALT, ILLEGIBLE. ACCEPTED PER (R8)#2. FOUND 5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP WITH ILLEGIBLE SCRIBING ACCEPTED AS QUARTER CORNER OF SECTIONS 10 & 15 PER (R8).
#3. FOUND 5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP WITH ILLEGIBLE SCRIBING. ACCEPTED AS CORNER USED FOR CITY LIMITS PER DOC. NO. 2008032825.
#4. FOUND 5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED "RCE 12545". ACCEPTED PER (R7)#5. FOUND 2.5" BRASS DISK TAGGED "SLO CO C.R. 10 R-78" IN CONCRETE, ACCEPTED FOR BRASS DISK "SLO CO" PER (R1), HELD FOR POINT ON NORTH LINE OF BUCKLEY ROAD.
349 350 351 352 353 354 344 345 346 347 348 340 341 342 343 335 336 337 339 331 332 333 334 365 363 362 360 359 358 357 356 355
376 377 378 379 380 370 372 373 374 375
381 382 383 384 385 386
391
392
390
389
388
387
403402
404 425
405 424
401
400 407
406
399 408
398 409 420
397 410 419
396 411 418395
394
393
412
413
414
417
416
415
433432
431
430
429
428
427
426
368 369
367 366
386
434
434
435
423
422
421
361
434
HUGHES LANE
EARHART WAY
COLEMAN LANE
YEAGER
COURT
WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY
SHEET 6
SHEET 8
SHEET 9
SHEET 10
371
364
338
DOOLITTLE DRIVE
SHEET 7
SHEET 13
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L
436
437
438
439
SHEET 12
SHEET 11
JESPERSEN ROAD
VENTURE DRIVE
BUCKLEY ROAD
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES 5 14 OF SHEETS
0 TRACT MAP NO. 3089 PHASE 5
PHASE 5 OF MULTIPLE PHASES
IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF
THE AGREEMENT DECLARATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SLO AL 18-0013 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2018-025711 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE,
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA.
INDEX SHEET
®
N 38° 53' 59" E 206.27' M & (R1)
TL
PT
A1
PT
WA
SW
PT
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L
CITY-L
CITY-L
P
T
PT
LO
66 LOT 338
6650 S.F.
LOT 337
6650 S.F.
LOT 336
6650 S.F.
LOT 335
6650 S.F.
LOT 334
6611 S.F.
LOT 333
7514 S.F.
LOT 332
7900 S.F.
LOT 331
7900 S.F.
LOT 365
4750 S.F.
LOT 364
4750 S.F. LOT 363
4750 S.F.
LOT 372
4750 S.F.
LOT 371
4750 S.F.
LOT 370
4750 S.F.
LOT 368
5204 S.F. LOT 369
4750 S.F.
LOT 366
4750 S.F.
LOT 367
5204 S.F.
LOT 434
OPEN SPACE
6.28 ACRES
RAD1
21.00'
20.00'
20.00'
HUGHES LANE
DOOLITTLE DRIVE
COLEMAN LANE
LOT 435
OPEN SPACE
/AGRICULTRAL
7.32 ACRES
BUCKLEY ROAD
27.00'
RAD2
29.00' 29.00'
29.00'
10.00'
10.00'
29.00'
SEE DETAIL 7A, SHEET 7
20.00'
5.00'
15.00' SOCAL GAS EASEMENT PER 2593/OR/706
OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT.
RECORDED CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS MAP.
15.00 PER 2
EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES.RECORDED CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS MAP.
N 88°42'44 W 1319.34' M
S 89°56'32" 1319.50' (R7)
N 88°42'44 W 1319.34' M
SEE DETAIL 4C, SEE SHEET 4 N 88°42'48" W [1319.40'] (R1) FD 5/8" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP
INSCRIBED "RCE 12545" PER (R7)
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
N 1° 19' 47" E 170.00' C11
L=8.33', R=45.00'
'=10° 36' 04"
N 1° 19' 47" E 97.15'
C4
C6
C5
C8
C3
N 11° 35' 26" E 154.29' M & (R1)
N 53° 09' 19" E 246.33' M & (R1)
N 56° 55' 29" E 321.07' M & (R1)
N 1° 16' 58" E 145.14'
N 66° 24' 22" E
220.54'
149.26'
22.88'
L9
L13
L=40.33', R=72.00'
'=32° 05' 47"
L1
L2
L3
L4
C10
L8
17.33'
10.15'
L5
L6
L12
L7
S 88° 40' 13" E 657.58'
L=21.31', R=72.00'
'=16° 57' 40"
L10
N 57° 36' 16" W
90.83' L=24.90', R=190.50'
'=7° 29' 18"
N 50° 06' 58" W
252.57' L=113.32', R=169.94' D=38° 12' 22"
N 89° 47' 28" W 484.62'
S 88° 42' 44" E 314.99'
N 88° 42' 44" W
77.45'
N 1° 19' 47" E 158.00'
N 1° 19' 47" E
158.00'
N 1° 19' 47" E
158.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 134.98'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.0
50.00' 50.00'
50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50
S 88° 40' 13" E 954.10'
S 88° 40' 13" E 1203.97'
55.00' 50.00' 50.00'
C1
C2
C3
C7
C9
45.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00'
50.00' 50.00'
85.00' 85.00'
45.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
4.87'
N 88° 40' 13" W 675.00'
98.06'
23.34'
N 88° 40' 13" W 100.00'
10.00' PRIVATE DRAINAGE
EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
5.00' PRIVATE DRAINAGE
EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
S 1° 19' 47" W
27.89'
N 53° 10' 59" W
46.21'
N 23° 57' 06" W
65.22'
N 31° 52' 37" W
75.68'
10.00'
S 88° 40' 13" E 1150.00'
133.60'
5.00'
39.68'
L11
40.11'
L
S 01° 19' 47" W 122.93'
S 60° 51' 04" E
11.44' S 86° 22' 37" E
S 31° 54' 24" E
12.31'
S 12° 43' 35" E
6.74'
S 81° 21' 08" E
254.11'
9.89'
1163.86
23.34'
40' DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT FROM WILLIAM
BUCKLEY, ET AL TO COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PER R9
20.00' 20.00'
PT
TL
A1
WA
SW
P
T
EASEMENT LEGEND
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AND STREET TREE EASEMENT PER THIS MAPBICYCLE TRAIL EASEMENT PER THIS MAPPRIVATE RECIPROCAL VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS,DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER EASEMENTS AND PUE PER THIS MAP
PUBLIC SEWER & WATER EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
PRIVATE RECIPROCAL WATER EASEMENT PER THIS MAPPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
STREET TREE EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
L LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
LINE TABLE
LINE
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5L6L7L8L9
L10
L11
L12L13
LENGTH
125.68'
99.85'
74.95'74.94'
21.61'24.17'
50.47'36.39'
42.20'
119.39'
14.27'
21.06'
40.53'
BEARING
S88° 42' 36"E
N88° 42' 36"W
S51° 20' 53"W
N51° 20' 53"E
S88° 40' 13"E
N88° 40' 13"W
S1° 19' 47"W
S55° 07' 01"E
N1° 19' 47"E
N88° 40' 13"W
N59° 53' 18"EN53° 09' 19"E
N55° 07' 01"W
CURVE TABLE
CURVE #
C1
C2
C3C4C5C6C7C8C9
C10
C11
LENGTH
8.33'
37.37'
49.53'
21.64'
98.80'
21.64'
15.71'
21.64'
15.71'
52.84'
8.33'
RADIUS
45.00'
72.00'72.00'75.00'
46.00'
75.00'
10.00'
75.00'
10.00'
72.00'
45.00'
DELTA
10°36'04"
29°44'29"
39°25'06"
16°31'42"
123°03'24"
16°31'42"
90°00'00"
16°31'44"
90°00'00"
42°02'53"
10°36'25"
RADIAL TABLE
LINE #
RAD1
RAD2
DIRECTION
S20° 28' 12"WS59° 53' 18"W
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES ®
6 14 OF SHEETS
0 50 100 25
SCALE
1 INCH = 50 FEET
SHEET 7
TRACT MAP NO. 3089 PHASE 5
LEGEND
SHEET 10
FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
SET 1" IRON PIPE CAPPED LS 8298, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDSET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED INTO THE STREET 0.20' FROM THE TRUE LOT CORNER. SEE DETAIL 10A ON SHEET 10 FOR OFFSET
INFORMATION
SET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED 1.00' FROM THE TRUE LOT CORNER ALONG THE LOT LINE. SEE DETAIL 10B, SHEET 10 FOR OFFSET
INFORMATION
SET 2.5" BRASS CAP INSCRIBED LS 8298 IN STANDARD CITY CENTERLINE
IN MONUMENT WELL
M MEASUREDRAD RADIALR1 041/MB/048, DISTANCES REDUCE TO GRIDR2 TRACT 3089 PHASES 2 & 3, SURVEY IN PROGRESSR7 081/RS/032R9 6/DEEDS/49 PHASE 5 OF MULTIPLE PHASES
IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF
THE AGREEMENT DECLARATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SLO AL 18-0013 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2018-025711 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE,
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA.
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES, LOT 434 OR PORTIONS THEREOF, ARE IN THE CURRENT 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. PORTIONS OF LOT 434 WILL BE OUT OF THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AFTER SITE GRADING IS PERFORMED AND THE REVISED FLOODPLAIN ISRECOGNIZED BY FEMA (CLOMR CASE 22-09-0955R), AS SHOWN ON SHEET 14 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN NOTE
S 88° 40' 13" 651.00'
N 86° 22' 37" W 161.34'
TL
A2 A2
A2
PT
PT
PT
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L PT
P
T
PT
PT
P T
PT
T P
LOT 35
6650 S
LOT 350
6650 S.F.
LOT 349
6650 S.F.
LOT 348
6650 S.F.
LOT 347
6650 S.F.
LOT 346
6650 S.F.
LOT 345
6650 S.F.
LOT 344
6650 S.F.
LOT 343
6650 S.F.
LOT 342
6650 S.F.
LOT 341
6650 S.F.
LOT 340
6650 S.F.
LOT 339
6650 S.F.
LOT 338
6650 S.F.
LOT 337
6650 S.F.
LOT 362
4750 S.F.
365
0 S.F.
LOT 364
4750 S.F. LOT 363
4750 S.F. LOT 361 4750 S.F. LOT 360 5462 S.F. LOT 359 5462 S.F. LOT 358 4750 S.F. LOT 357 4750 S.F. LOT 356 4750 S.F.
LOT 355
5183 S.F.
LOT 380
5183 S.F.
LOT 379
4750 S.F.
LOT 378
4750 S.F.
LOT 377
4750 S.F.
LOT 376
5462 S.F.
LOT 375
5462 S.F.
LOT 374
4750 S.F.
LOT 373
4750 S.F.
LOT 372
4750 S.F.
LOT 371
4750 S.F.
T 370
0 S.F.
LOT 396
5938 S.F.
LOT 395
4750 S.F.
LOT 394
4750 S.F.
LOT 393
5192 S.F.
20.00 15.00'
LANE
HUGHES LANE
EARHART WAY
OOLITTLE DRIVE
29.00' 29.00'
10.00'
10.00'
29.00' 29.00'
29.00' 29.00'
29.00' 29.00
10.00'
7.50'
7.50'
20.00'
15.00' SOCAL GAS EASEME
15.00' SOCAL GAS EASEMENT
PER 2593/OR/706
21.00'
BUCKLEY ROAD
EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES.RECORDED CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS MAP.
N 88°42'44 W 1319.34' MS 89°56'32" 1319.50' (R7)
N 88°42'44 W 1319.34' M
N 88°42'48" W [1319.40'] (
N 88°42'44 W 1319.34' M
S 89°56'32" 1319.50' (R7)
N 88°42'44 W 1319.34' M
N 88°42'48" W [1319.40'] (R1)
OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD
EASEMENT. RECORDED CONCURRENTLY
WITH THIS MAP.
DOOLITTLE DRIVE
5.00' PRIVATE DRAINAGE
EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
10.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W 651.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W 651.00'
N 1° 19' 47" E 162.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W 240.63'
C19
N 88° 40' 13" W 657.58'
N 88° 40' 13" W
N 88° 40' 13" W 657.58'
N 1° 19' 47" E 587.67'
248.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W 954.10'
S 01° 19' 47" W 581.09'
N 01° 19' 47" E 605.09'
N 89° 47' 28" W 484.62' N 88° 38' 43" W 158.47'
L=39.78', R=169.50'
'=13° 26' 46"
S 77° 54' 31" W
80.06'
L=45.56', R=190.50'
'=13° 42' 08"
N 88° 23' 21" W 214.22'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.0
50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 954.10'
0.00'
50.00' 50.00'
50.00' 50.00' 50.00'
50.00' 50.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W 1203.97'
57.50' 57.50' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 41.00'
50.00' 57.50' 57.50' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 55.00'
0' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 57.50' 57.50' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 41.00'
81.00' 81.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 1° 19' 47" E
95.00'
55.09' 50.00' 50.00' 62.50'
41.09' 50.00' 50.00' 62.50'
62 6
81.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
95.00'
N 8
N 88°
1 N 88° 40' 13" W
95.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
95.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
95.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W 675.00'
C13
C12
S 88° 40
S 88°
5.00'
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
5.00'
29.00' 29.00'
S 88° 40' 13" E 1150.00'
S 88° 40' 1
L
L
5.00' PRIVATE DRAINAGE
EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
147.93'
S 86° 22' 37" E 161.34' S 87° 00' 22" E 116.24'
S 87° 47' 47" E
53.68'
S 89° 48' 35" E
60.08'
S 89° 48' 57" E 418.98'
N
SEE
23.34'
LOT 435
OPEN SPACE
/AGRICULTRAL
7.32 ACRES
LOT 435
OPEN SPACE
/AGRICULTRAL
7.32 ACRES
40' DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT FROM WILLIAM
BUCKLEY, ET AL TO COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PER R9
20.00' 20.00'
40' DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD EASE
AL TO COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PE
20.00' 20.00'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE #
C10C12C13C19
LENGTH
52.84'
21.99'21.99'21.99'
RADIUS
72.00'
14.00'14.00'14.00'
DELTA
42°02'53"
90°00'00"90°00'00"90°00'00"
A1
A2
PT
TL
WA
SW
P
T
PRIVATE RECIPROCAL VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS,DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER EASEMENTS AND PUE PER THIS MAPPRIVATE RECIPROCAL LANDSCAPE, DRAINAGE, WATER, SEWER &PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT PER THIS MAPPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AND STREET TREE EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
EASEMENT LEGEND
BICYCLE TRAIL EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
PUBLIC SEWER & WATER EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
PRIVATE RECIPROCAL WATER EASEMENT PER THIS MAPPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
STREET TREE EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
D DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
L LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
LINE TABLE
LINE
L5L6L7L9
L10
L11
LENGTH
21.61'24.17'
50.47'
42.20'
119.39'
14.27'
BEARING
S88° 40' 13"E
N88° 40' 13"W
S1° 19' 47"W
N1° 19' 47"E
N88° 40' 13"W
N59° 53' 18"E
RADIAL TABLE
LINE #
RAD2
DIRECTION
S59° 53' 18"W
WA SW
SW
WA
A1
RAD2
LOT 331
7900 S.F.
LOT 332
7900 S.F.
LOT 434
OPEN SPACE
6.18 ACRES
27.00'
20.00'
20.00'
EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES.RECORDED CONCURRENTLY WITH THISMAP.
20.00'
L9
L10
S 1° 19' 47" W
39.00' L11
N 88° 40' 13" W 100.00'
23.50 N 32° 36' 22" E
14.04'
S 88° 40' 13" E
28.21'
31.47 N 88° 40' 13" W 139.39'
L720.00
50.00' 50.00'
L6
16.89'
20.00 L=21.31', R=72.00'
'=16° 57' 40"
N 1° 19' 47" E 158.00'
S 1° 19' 47" W 158.00'
N 1° 19' 47" E 158.00'
L5
C10
D
10.00'
PT
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES ®
7 14 OF SHEETS
0 50 100 25
SCALE
1 INCH = 50 FEET
TRACT MAP NO. 3089 PHASE 5
SHEET 6
SHEET 10
SHEET 8
SET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED
INTO THE STREET 0.20' FROM THE TRUE
LOT CORNER. SEE DETAIL 10A ON SHEET
10 FOR OFFSET INFORMATION
SET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED
1.00' FROM THE TRUE LOT CORNER ALONG
THE LOT LINE. SEE DETAIL 10B, SHEET 10
FOR OFFSET INFORMATION
SET 2.5" BRASS CAP INSCRIBED LS 8298 INSTANDARD CITY CENTERLINE IN
MONUMENT WELL
M MEASURED
RAD RADIALR1 041/MB/048, DISTANCES REDUCE TO GRIDR2 TRACT 3089 PHASES 2 & 3, SURVEY IN
PROGRESS
R7 081/RS/032R9 6/DEEDS/49
PHASE 5 OF MULTIPLE PHASES
IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF
THE AGREEMENT DECLARATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SLO AL 18-0013 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2018-025711 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE,
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA.
SHEET 9
DETAIL 7A
SCALE 1" = 20'
LEGEND
FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
SET 1" IRON PIPE CAPPED LS 8298, UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES, LOT 434 OR PORTIONS THEREOF, ARE IN THE CURRENT 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. PORTIONS OF LOT 434 WILL BE OUT OF THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AFTER SITE GRADING IS PERFORMED AND THE REVISED FLOODPLAIN IS RECOGNIZED BY FEMA (CLOMR CASE 22-09-0955R), AS SHOWN ON SHEET 14
100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN NOTE
SHEET 8
N 81° 21' 08" W 254.11'
TL
A2 A2
PT
A1
PT
PT
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L
P P
PT
P
T
PT
PT
P T
PT
T P
PT
LOT 352
6650 S.F.
LOT 353
6650 S.F.
LOT 354
9961 S.F.
LOT 351
6650 S.F.
LOT 350
6650 S.F.
LOT 349
6650 S.F.
LOT 348
6650 S.F.
LOT 347
6650 S.F.
LOT 346
6650 S.F.
LOT 345
6650 S.F.
LOT 344
6650 S.F.
OT 358
50 S.F.
LOT 357
4750 S.F.
LOT 356
4750 S.F.
LOT 355
5183 S.F.
LOT 380
5183 S.F.
LOT 379
4750 S.F.
LOT 378
4750 S.F.
T 377
0 S.F.
LOT 418
6875 S.F.
LOT 411
8125 S.F.
LOT 396
5938 S.F.
LOT 395
4750 S.F.
LOT 394
4750 S.F.
LOT 393
5192 S.F.
LOT 412
6500 S.F.
LOT 413
6500 S.F.
LOT 414
7162 S.F.
LOT 417
5500 S.F.
LOT 416
5500 S.F.
LOT 415
6560 S.F.
LOT 426
PUBLIC PARK
1.64 ACRES
L=99.12', R=179.00'
∆=31° 43' 34"
20.00'
20.00'
HUGHES LANE
EARHART WAY
29.00' 29.00'
29.00' 29.00'
29.00' 29.0
SEE DETAIL 8A, SHEET 8
ALLEY 24
20.00'
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
JESPERSEN ROAD
FD 2" BRASS DISK IN CONCRETE TAGGED
"SLO CO CR. 10 R-78" IN CONCRETE (R5)
15.00' SOCAL GAS EASEMENT PER 2593/OR/706
BUCKLEY ROAD
(COUNTY ROAD A2089)
30.00'
30.00'
21.00'
EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES.RECORDED CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS MAP.
N 88°42'44 W 1319.34' MS 89°56'32" 1319.50' (R7)
N 88°42'44 W 1319.34' M
N 88°42'48" W [1319.40'] (R1)
1)
10' PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS EASEMENT BENEFITING
LOTS 415-425 PER THIS MAP
3.00' 3.00'
E
30.00'
10.00'
N 1° 19' 47" E 424.47'
N 1° 19' 47" E 162.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W 240.63'
C19
RAD3
L15
N 88° 40' 13" W 283.63'
N 1° 19' 47" E 587.67'
248.00'
RAD4
L=126.26', R=355.00'
'=20° 22' 38"
L=67.00
R=1 ',
21.00'
D=31° 43' 34"
N 88° 40' 13" W 954.10'
S 01° 19' 47" W 581.09'
RAD6
RAD7
RAD5
C17
S 56° 56' 39" E
81.25'
N 01° 19' 47" E 605.09'
N 01° 19' 47" E 605.09'
N 12° 26' 33" W
48.80'
N 33° 03' 21" E 307.79'
L=166.12', R=300.00'
D=31° 43' 35"
L=31.08', R=325.00'
'=5° 28' 46"
N 01° 37' 01" E
101.63'
N 01° 37' 01" E
20.00'
L=147.28', R=325.00'
'=25° 57' 55"
N 88° 38' 43" W 158.47'
L=39.78', R=169.50'
'=13° 26' 46" S 77° 54' 31" W 80.06'
L=45.56', R=190.50'
'=13° 42' 08"
N 88° 23' 21" W 214.22'
S 16° 12' 14" W
59.82'
30.12'
29.70'
N 88° 22' 25" W
43.38'
N 88° 22' 25" W
42.83'
58.32'
23.31'
97.55'
210.24'
33.00 N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 133.00'
50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00'
50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 49.23' 88° 40' 13" W 1203.97'
00' 50.00' 50.00' 41.00'
50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 55.00'
50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 41.00'
81.00' 81.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 1° 19' 47" E
95.00'
55.09' 50.00' 50.00' 62.50'
50.00' 50.00' 55.09'
41.09' 50.00' 50.00' 62.50'
74.15' 50.00' 50.00' 62.50' 6
62.50'
6 81.00' 130.00' 29.63'
N 88° 40' 13" W
95.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
130.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
110.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
110.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
130.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
95.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
95.00' S 88° 40' 13" E
130.00'
S 88° 40' 13" E
110.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
110.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
130.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
95.00'
C13
C12
S 88° 40' 13" E 954.10'
L14
C16
C15
C18
N 33° 03' 21" E 162.24'
L=15.76', R=179.00'
'=5° 02' 44"
S 88° 40' 13" E 1203.97'
53.97'
49.55'
36.97 L=149.51', R=270.00'
'=31° 43' 35"
5.00'
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
5.00'
29.00' 29.00'
10.00'
S 88° 40' 13" E 1150.00'
S 88° 40' 13" E 1150.00'
D
N 01°
5.00'
L
5.00' PRIVATE DRAINAGE
EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
66.29' 147.93'
N 82° 47' 49" W
RADIAL
L
L=182.73', R=330.00'
'=31° 43' 35"
S 89° 48' 35" E
60.08'
S 89° 48' 57" E 418.98'
N 72° 29' 01" E
47.55'
C14
SEE DETAIL 8B, SHEET 8
S 35° 07' 27" W
106.91'
30.00'
1163.86
LOT 435
OPEN SPACE
/AGRICULTRAL
7.32 ACRES
L=137.85', R=295.00'
'=26° 46' 27"
S 33° 03' 21" W 307.79'
EASEMENT FROM WILLIAM
AN LUIS OBISPO PER R9
40' DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT FROM WILLIAM BUCKLEY, ET AL TO COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PER R9
20.00' 20.00'
LINE TABLE
LINE
L14
L15
LENGTH
32.25'32.25'
BEARING
S56° 56' 39"ES56° 56' 39"E
CURVE TABLE
CURVE #
C14C15C16C17C18C19C38C39
LENGTH
55.11'33.92'
29.85'83.06'29.85'21.99'
49.85'
16.80'
RADIUS
355.00'355.00'
19.00'
150.00'
19.00'14.00'
355.00'355.00'
DELTA
8°53'42"5°28'31"
90°00'00"31°43'34"90°00'00"90°00'00"
8°02'42"
2°42'40"
A1
A2
PT
TL
P
EASEMENT LEGEND
PRIVATE RECIPROCAL VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS,DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER EASEMENTS AND PUE PER THIS MAPPRIVATE RECIPROCAL LANDSCAPE, DRAINAGE, WATER, SEWER &PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT PER THIS MAPPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AND STREET TREE EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
BICYCLE TRAIL EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
T STREET TREE EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
L LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
RADIAL TABLE
LINE #
RAD3
RAD4
RAD5RAD6RAD7
DIRECTION
N28° 00' 37"E
N62° 25' 13"WN56° 56' 41"W
N1° 41' 34"E
N33° 03' 33"E
RAD6 LOT 353 LOT 354
S 88° 40' 13" E 954.10'
S 88° 40' 13" E 49.23'
L=67.00', R=121.00' ∆=31° 43' 34"
L=0.77', R=121.00'
Δ=0° 21' 47"
L=66.23', R=121.00' ∆=31° 21' 47"
N 1° 19' 47" E
133.00'
C14
C38
C39
D
PT
L
LOT 354
9961 S.F.
LOT 435
OPEN SPACE
7.32 ACRES.
LOT 353
6650 S.F.
L
N 72° 29' 01" E
47.55'
S 89° 48' 57" E
418.98'
S 71° 56' 39" E
20.30'
10.00'
N 75° 05' 35" W
25.12'
N 25° 08' 35" W
56.29'
N 88° 40' 13" W 53.97'
45.31 8.66'
RAD4
S 35° 07' 27" W 106.91'
L=4.50', R=355.00'
'=0° 43' 34"
C15
N 88° 40' 13" W 50.00'
5.00' PRIVATE DRAINAGE
EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
S 88° 40' 13" E
56.55'
S 01° 19' 47" W
28.34'
5.00'
S 73° 54' 09" E
RADIAL
S 70° 27' 55" E
RADIAL
L
D
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES ®
8 14 OF SHEETS
0 50 100 25
SCALE
1 INCH = 50 FEET
TRACT MAP NO. 3089 PHASE 5
SHEET 7
SHEET 9
LEGEND
FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
SET 1" IRON PIPE CAPPED LS 8298, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDSET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED INTO THE STREET 0.20' FROM THE TRUE LOT CORNER. SEE DETAIL 10A ON SHEET 10 FOR OFFSET
INFORMATION
SET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED 1.00' FROM THE TRUE LOT CORNER ALONG THE LOT LINE. SEE DETAIL 10B, SHEET 10 FOROFFSET INFORMATION SET 2.5" BRASS CAP INSCRIBED LS 8298 IN STANDARD CITY
CENTERLINE IN MONUMENT WELL
M MEASURED
RAD RADIALR1 041/MB/048, DISTANCES REDUCE TO GRIDR2 TRACT 3089 PHASES 2 & 3, SURVEY IN PROGRESSR5 028/CR/084R7 081/RS/032R9 6/DEEDS/49 PHASE 5 OF MULTIPLE PHASES
IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF
THE AGREEMENT DECLARATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SLO AL 18-0013 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2018-025711 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE,
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA.
DETAIL 8A
SCALE 1" = 5'
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC
ROAD EASEMENT. RECORDED
CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS MAP.
SHEET 11
EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGEPURPOSES. RECORDED
CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS MAP.
DETAIL 8B
SCALE 1" = 20'
23.34'
TL
A2
A2
A2 A2
A1
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
PT
P P
P P
PT
PT
P T
PT
T
P PT T
T
P
PT
LOT 380
5183 S F LOT 374 LOT 375
LOT 391
4698 S.F.
LOT 392
5418 S.F.
LOT 390
4750 S.F.
LOT 389
4750 S.F.
LOT 388
4750 S.F.
LOT 387
5183 S.F.
LOT 403
5204 S.F.
LOT 402
4750 S.F.
LOT 404
7150 S.F.
LOT 425
6050 S.F.
LOT 405
6500 S.F. LOT 424 5500 S.F.
LOT 401
4750 S.F.
LOT 400
5700 S.F.
LOT 407
7800 S.F.
LOT 406
6500 S.F.
LOT 422
6600 S.F.
LOT 408
7800 S.F.
LOT 399
5700 S.F. LOT 421
6600 S.F.
LOT 420
5500 S.F.
LOT 409
6500 S.F.
LOT 398
4750 S.F.
LOT 397
5938 S.F.
LOT 410
8125 S.F.
LOT 419
6875 S.F.
LOT 418
6875 S.F.
LOT 411
8125 S.F.
LOT 396
5938 S.F.
LOT 433
5178 S.F.
LOT 432
5019 S.F.
LOT 431
5019 S.F.
LOT 430
5499 S.F.
LOT 429
5019 S.F.
LOT 428
5499 S.F.
LOT 427
5450 S.F.
LOT 423
5500 S.F.
LOT 426
PUBLIC PARK
1.64 ACRES
20.00'
20.00'
20.00'
20.00'
20.00'
YEAGER COURT
EARHART WAY
WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY
LOT 386
PUBLIC PARK
9807 S.F.
SEE DETAIL 10C, SHEET 10
5.00'
10.00'
29.00' 29.00'
ALLEY 24
20.00'
10.00'
10.00'
29.00' 29.00'
10.00'
10.00'
JESPERSEN ROAD
SEE DETAIL 11A, SHEET 11
LOT 436
0.84 ACRES
LOT 437
0.92 ACRES
OPEN SPACE
10.00'
10.00'
WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY
30.00'
30.00'
30.00'
LOT 434
OPEN SPACE
6.28 ACRES
LOT 434
OPEN SPACE
6.28 ACRES
10' PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS EASEMENT BENEFITING
LOTS 415-425 PER THIS MAP
3.00' 3.00'
3.00' 3.00'
DOOLITTLE DRIVE
29.00' 29.00'
5.00'
L=156.37', R=46.00' ∆=194° 45' 48"
N 88° 40' 13" W 651.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W 125.97'
5.15'
N 1° 19' 47" E 228.99'
N 11° 34' 22" E
65.47'
N 1° 19' 47" E 581.09'
N 1° 19' 47" E 605.09'
N 1° 19' 47" E 605.09'
C32
RAD10
N 1° 19' 47" E 105.00'
40.63'
RAD11
9.98'
N 88° 40' 13" W 657.58'
N 1° 19' 47" E 587.67'
339.67'
N 88° 40' 13" W 288.58'
C30
C28
C27
N 1° 19' 47" E 144.13'
C23
RAD8
N 59° 45' 25" E
65.56' M & (R2)
N 11° 13' 10" E 273.26' M & (R2)
N 43° 28' 12" E 401.65' M & (R2)
N 82° 27' 13" E 229.10' M & (R2)
L=22.15', R=90.00'
'=14° 05' 58"
N 37° 05' 28" W
8.06'
L=27.06', R=109.98'
'=14° 05' 58"
N 37° 05' 28" W
8.06'
115.45' 159.20' 129.38'
S 70° 47' 31" E
436.23' M & (R2)
20.07'
L=135.56', R=72.00'
∆=107° 52' 24"
L=20.06', R=72.00'
'=15° 58' 02"
266.14'
RAD9
15.32'
0'
N 88° 40' 13" W 222.99'
N 06° 47' 40" W 522.87'
N 01° 19' 46" E 391 65'
S 6° 47' 23" E
68.24'
S 01° 19' 46" W
61.77'
N 24° 52' 43" W
6.25'
N 01° 56' 13" W
25.87'
L=48.23', R=112.88'
'=24° 28' 50"
L=52.58', R=92.88'
'=32° 26' 11"
S 89° 11' 42" W35.27'
N 01° 56' 13" W
31.97'
S 1° 19' 47" W 245.63'
S 88° 40' 13" E 153.49'
N 1° 19' 47" E 199.68'
N 0
44.68'
S 06° 47' 24" E
26.33'
N 6° 47' 24"
74.24'
L=18.33', R=32.87'
'=31° 57' 03"
50.00' 57.50' 57.50' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 41.00'
E
1.00'
95.00'
E 95.00'
47" E 95.00'
7" E 95.00'
7" E 95.00'
E 95.00'
62.50'
62.50'
62.50' 62.50' 50.00'
62.50'
62.50'
62.50'
62.50' 50.00' 60.00'
60.00'
60.00'
60.00'
60.00' 50.00'
50.00' 60.00'
50.00' 60.00'
60.00' 50.00'
50.00'
50.00'
95.00' S 88° 40' 13" E S 88° 40'
N 88° 40' 13" W
110.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
130.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
95.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
95.00' S 88° 40' 13" E
130.00'
S 88° 40' 13" E
110.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
110.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
130.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
95.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
95.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
130.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
95.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
130.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
110.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
110.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
130.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
95.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
95.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
130.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W
110.00'
55.00'
55.00'
55.00'
45.00' 50.00'
50.00'
50.00'
50.00'
110.00' 130.00' 85.00'
S 84° 43' 33" E
92.23'
N 84° 35' 36" E
95.14'
N 61° 02' 29" E
85.32'
30.97'
S 88° 40' 13" E 95.00'
S 88° 40' 13" E 95.00'
S 88° 40' 13" E 95.00'
S 88° 33' 38" E 90.27'
S 88° 33' 38" E
83.31'
N 01° 26' 22" E
25.17'
38.85' 26.62' 23.99' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W 627.46'
81.00'
41.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.01' 63.41' C13
N 01° 24' 10" E 91.77' S 88° 40' 13" E 100.38'
S 88° 40' 13" E 100.38'
N 79° 12' 58" E
56.26'
42.70' 90.38'
C20
C21
C22
C24
S 88° 40' 13" E 115.50'
S 88° 40' 13" E 100.38'
S 88° 40' 13" E 100.38'
N 88° 40' 13" W 100.38'
N 88° 40' 13" W 90.38'
N 1° 19' 47" E 160.91'
45.00' 50.00' 50.00'
15.91'
50.00' 45.00'
50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 55.00'
C25
C26
C29 C31
N 51° 11' 01" W
59.16'
N 51° 11' 25" W
60.79'
N 88° 40' 13" W 325.00'
S 1° 19' 47" W 309.57'
55.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W 192.99'
N 02° 39' 27" W
14.82'
N 01° 19' 46" E
36.97'
L=149.51', R=270.00'
'=31° 43' 35"
N 31° 10' 44" W
47.90'
S 87° 56' 29" W
57.85'
L=36.12', R=112.88'
'=18° 20' 02"
L=30.84', R=32.88'
'=53° 45' 27"
L=40.36', R=92.88'
'=24° 54' 02"
S 08° 55' 45" E 85.75'
S 10° 15' 30" W
16.83'
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
5.00'
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
5.00' 10.00'
10.00'
P
10.00'
10.00'
PT
PT 10.00'
N 4° 36' 50" E
19.76'
N 01° 19' 47" E 424.47'
N 1° 19' 47" E
104.98'
S 88° 40' 13" E
133.08'
N 88° 40' 13" W
110.00'
SEE DETAIL 12B, SHEET 12
95.00'
S 1° 56' 12" E
RADIAL
CURVE TABLE
CURVE #
C20
C21
C22
C23C24C25C26C27C28C29C30
C31
C32
LENGTH
15.71'15.71'
38.39'59.17'
18.57'
8.33'
4.19'
21.64'
98.80'
15.71'
21.64'
8.33'
21.99'
RADIUS
10.00'10.00'
46.11'
100.00'
17.00'
45.00'
72.00'75.00'
46.00'
10.00'
75.00'
45.00'
14.00'
DELTA
90°00'00"90°00'00"
47°42'45"
33°54'06"62°35'33"
10°36'25"
3°20'04"
16°31'43"
123°03'27"
90°00'00"
16°31'43"10°36'04"
90°00'00"
RADIAL TABLE
LINE #
RAD8RAD9
RAD10
RAD11
DIRECTION
N57° 25' 41"E
N48° 58' 36"W
S8° 36' 07"W
N43° 30' 02"E
D
A1
A2
PT
TL
P
EASEMENT LEGEND
DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER THIS MAPPRIVATE RECIPROCAL VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS,DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER EASEMENTS AND PUE PER THIS MAPPRIVATE RECIPROCAL LANDSCAPE, DRAINAGE, WATER, SEWER &PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT PER THIS MAPPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AND STREET TREE EASEMENT PER THIS MAPBICYCLE TRAIL EASEMENT PER THIS MAPPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
T STREET TREE EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
PHASE 5 OF MULTIPLE PHASES
IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF
THE AGREEMENT DECLARATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SLO AL 18-0013 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2018-025711 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE,
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA.
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES ®
9 14 OF SHEETS
0 50 100 25
SCALE
1 INCH = 50 FEET
TRACT MAP NO. 3089 PHASE 5
LEGEND
FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
SET 1" IRON PIPE CAPPED LS 8298, UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED
SET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED INTO THESTREET 0.20' FROM THE TRUE LOT CORNER. SEE DETAIL 10A ON SHEET 10 FOR OFFSET INFORMATION
SET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED 1.00' FROM THE
TRUE LOT CORNER ALONG THE LOT LINE. SEE DETAIL
10B, SHEET 10 FOR OFFSET INFORMATION
SET 2.5" BRASS CAP INSCRIBED LS 8298 IN STANDARD
CITY CENTERLINE IN MONUMENT WELL
M MEASURED
RAD RADIALR1 041/MB/048, DISTANCES REDUCE TO GRIDR2 TRACT 3089 PHASES 2 & 3, SURVEY IN PROGRESS SHEET 7
SHEET 8
SHEET 10
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
SHEET 11
SHEET 11
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES, LOTS 386-392, 398-401, AND 434, OR PORTIONS THEREOF, ARE IN THE CURRENT 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. LOTS 386-292 AND 398-401 AND PORTIONS OF LOT 434 WILL BE OUT OF THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AFTER SITE GRADING IS PERFORMED AND THE REVISED FLOODPLAIN IS RECOGNIZED BY FEMA (CLOMR CASE 22-09-0955R), AS SHOWN ON SHEET 14 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN NOTE
DOOLITTLE DRIVE
A2
PT
WA
PT
PT
PT
PT
P
T
PT
P
T
PT
PT
P T
PT
T
LOT 362
4750 S.F.
LOT 365
4750 S.F.
LOT 364
4750 S.F. LOT 363
4750 S.F. LOT 361 4750 S.F. LOT 360 5462 S.F. LOT 359 5462 S.F. LOT 358 4750 S.F. LOT 357 4750 S.F. LOT 356 4750 S.F.
LOT 355
5183 S.F.
LOT 380
5183 S.F.
LOT 379
4750 S.F.
LOT 378
4750 S.F.
LOT 377
4750 S.F.
LOT 376
5462 S.F.
LOT 375
5462 S.F.
LOT 374
4750 S.F.
LOT 373
4750 S.F.
LOT 372
4750 S.F.
LOT 371
4750 S.F.
LOT 370
4750 S.F.
LOT 381
5409 S.F.
LOT 382
5135 S.F.
LOT 383
5357 S.F. LOT 384
4902 S.F.
LOT 385
4664 S.F.
LOT 391
4698 S.F.
LOT 390
4750 S.F.
LOT 389
4750 S.F.
LOT 388
4750 S.F.
LOT 387
5183 S.F.
LOT 368
5204 S.F. LOT 369
4750 S.F.
LOT 366
4750 S.F.
LOT 367
5204 S.F.
RAD1
15.00'
HUGHES LANE
DOOLITTLE DRIVE
COLEMAN LANE
LOT 386
PUBLIC PARK
9807 S.F.
27.00'
SEE DETAIL 10C, SHEET 10
RAD2
29.00'
29.00'
10.00'
.00'
29.00 29.00' 29.00'
29.00'
20.00'
5.00'
00'
7.50'
7.50'
10.00'
LOT 434
OPEN SPACE
6.28 ACRES
DOOLITTLE DRIVE
LOT 386
PUBLIC PARK
9807 S.F.
10.00'
5.00'
0'
10.00'
10.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W 651.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W 651.00'
N 1° 19' 47" E 162.00'
N 1° 19' 47" E 170.00'
N 79° 59' 39" E
113.69'
RAD13
RAD12
L17
C11
N 88° 40' 13" W 125.97'
L=8.33', R=45.00'
'=10° 36' 04"
N 1° 19' 47" E 228.99'
N
C32
N 1° 19' 47" E 97.15'
C4
C6
N 88° 40' 13" W 657.58'
C5
C8
C33
C34
248 00'
N 42° 29' 15" E 294.56' M & (R1)
N 11° 35' 26" E 154.29' M & (R1)
N 59° 45' 25" E
65.56' M & (R2)
N 11° 13' 10" E 2
22.88'
L9
L13
L=40.33', R=72.00'
'=32° 05' 47"
C10
L8
L6
L12
L7
L=21.31', R=72.00'
'=16° 57' 40"
L10
S 70° 47' 31" E
436.23' M & (R2)
55.00' 50.00' 50.00'
C7
C9
45.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00'
50.00' 50.00' 50.00'
50.00' 50.00' 57.50' 57.50' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 41.00'
50.00' 57.50' 57.50' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 55.00'
85.00' 85.00'
45.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 57.50' 57.50' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 41.00'
81.00' 81.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00' N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 95.00'
N 1° 19' 47" E
95.00'
N 01° 19' 47" E 132.20'
S 1° 19' 47" W
98.64'
S 1° 19' 47" W
108.63'
S 1° 19' 47" W
101.79'
S 1° 19' 47" W
95.56'
S 01° 19' 47" W 91.01'
50.99'
11.70'
39.60'
11.74'
S 84° 43' 33" E
92.23'
N 84° 35' 36" E
95.14'
N 61° 02' 29" E
85.32'
30.97'
S 88° 40' 13" E 95.00'
S 88° 40' 13" E 95.00'
S 88° 40' 13" E 95.00'
26 23.99' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W 627.46'
N 88° 40' 13" W 627.46'
11.47'
50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 384.99'
81.00'
41.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 50.01'
N 88° 40' 13" W 675.00' N 88° 40' 13" W 675.00'
C13
C12
S 1° 19' 47" W 309.57'
55.00'
C35 C36 C37
N 88° 40' 13" W 100.00'
L18
L19
L20
L21
L22
50.99'
5.00'
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
10.00'
5.00' PRIVATE DRAINAGE
EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
10.00'
L11
S 01° 19' 47" W 122.93'
95.00'
180°
180°
RADIAL
0.20'
RADIAL
0.20'
0.20'
0.20'
STREET
STREET
LOT
LOT
LOT
TYPICAL MONUMENTATION DETAIL ALONG STREETS
0.20'
0.20'
0.20'
TRUE LOT CORNER
0.20'
180°
LOT
WHERE LOT LINES AT CORNERS ARE COINCIDENT AND PARALLEL AS SHOWN, MONUMENT IS SET 1.00' WESTERLY ALONG THE LOT LINE FROM THE TRUE LOT CORNER. WHERE LOT LINES AT CORNERS ARE STAGGERED, MONUMENT IS SET 1.00' FROM THE TRUE LOT CORNER
ALONG THE LOT LINE
LOT
LOT
LOT
LOT
ALLEY LOT LOT
ALLEY
TYPICAL MONUMENTATION DETAIL ALONG ALLEYS
LOT
1.00'
1.00'
1.00'
1.00'
RADIAL TABLE
LINE #
RAD12RAD13
DIRECTION
N67° 10' 30"WN12° 19' 16"W
LINE TABLE
LINE
L12
L13L17L18L19L20
L21
L22
LENGTH
21.06'
40.53'
51.33'38.74'50.21'33.56'
42.21'
52.14'
BEARING
N53° 09' 19"E
N55° 07' 01"W
S75° 19' 13"ES83° 27' 45"ES83° 27' 45"ES58° 00' 15"ES32° 45' 14"ES51° 07' 32"E
0.81'
S 84° 43' 33" E
92.23'
N 84° 35' 36" E
95.14'
N 88° 40' 13" W 384.99'
CURVE TABLE
CURVE #
C6
C7C8C9
C11
C32C33C34
C35
C36C37
LENGTH
21.64'
15.71'
21.64'
15.71'
8.33'
21.99'
98.80'
21.64'68.93'
30.48'
8.33'
RADIUS
75.00'
10.00'
75.00'
10.00'
45.00'
14.00'
46.00'
75.00'72.00'72.00'
45.00'
DELTA
16°31'42"
90°00'00"
16°31'44"
90°00'00"
10°36'25"
90°00'00"
123°03'27"
16°31'44"
54°51'14"
24°15'28"
10°36'25"
A2
PT
EASEMENT LEGEND
PRIVATE RECIPROCAL LANDSCAPE, DRAINAGE, WATER, SEWER &PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT PER THIS MAPPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AND STREET TREE EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
P PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
T STREET TREE EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES ®
10 14 OF SHEETS
0 50 100 25
SCALE
1 INCH = 50 FEET
DETAIL 10A TRACT MAP NO. 3089 PHASE 5
NOT TO SCALE
DETAIL 10B NOT TO SCALE
DETAIL 10C
SCALE 1" = 5
LEGEND
FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
SET 1" IRON PIPE CAPPED LS 8298, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDSET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED INTO THE STREET 0.20' FROM THE TRUE LOT CORNER. SEE DETAIL 10A ON SHEET 10 FOR OFFSET
INFORMATION
SET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED 1.00' FROM THE TRUE LOT CORNER ALONG THE LOT LINE. SEE DETAIL 10B, SHEET 10 FOR OFFSET
INFORMATION
SET 2.5" BRASS CAP INSCRIBED LS 8298 IN STANDARD CITY CENTERLINE
IN MONUMENT WELL
M MEASURED
RAD RADIALR1 041/MB/048, DISTANCES REDUCE TO GRIDR2 TRACT 3089 PHASES 2 & 3, SURVEY IN PROGRESS PHASE 5 OF MULTIPLE PHASES
IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF
THE AGREEMENT DECLARATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SLO AL 18-0013 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2018-025711 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE,
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA.
SHEET 7
SHEET 6
N 01° 19' 47" W
SHEET 9
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES, LOTS AND 386-387, AND 434 OR PORTIONS THEREOF, ARE IN THE CURRENT 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. LOTS 386-387 AND PORTIONS OF LOT 434 WILL BE OUT OF THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AFTER SITE GRADING IS PERFORMED AND THE REVISED FLOODPLAIN IS RECOGNIZED BY FEMA (CLOMR CASE 22-09-0955R), AS SHOWN ON SHEET 14 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN NOTE
PT
PT
PT
PT
5 F.
0 F.
LOT 426
PUBLIC PARK
1.64 ACRES
10.00'
JESPERSEN ROAD
SEE DETAIL 11A, SHEET 11
LOT 436
0.84 ACRES
LOT 437
0.92 ACRES
0.73 ACRES
OPEN SPACE
10.00'
10.00'
WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY
30.00' 30.00'
30.00'
30.00'
10' PRIVATE PEDESTRIAN
ACCESS EASEMENT BENEFITING
LOTS 415-425 PER THIS MAP
40.63'
15.32'
N 88° 40' 13" W 224.88' N 88° 40' 13" W 222.99'
N 06° 47' 40" W 522.87'
N 01° 19' 46" E 391.65'
S 6° 47' 23" E
68.24'
24.00' 24.00'
S 01° 19' 46" W
61.77'
N 24° 52' 43" W
6.25'
N 01° 56' 13" W
25.87'
L=48.23', R=112.88'
'=24° 28' 50"
L=52.58', R=92.88'
'=32° 26' 11"
S 89° 11' 42" W35.27'
N 01° 56' 13" W
31.97'
S 1° 19' 47" W 245.63'
S 88° 40' 13" E 153.49'
N 1° 19' 47" E 199.68'
N 06° 4
44.68'
S 06° 47' 24" E
26.33'
N 6° 47' 24" W
74.24'
L=18.33', R=32.87'
'=31° 57' 03"
62.50' 62.50' 50.00' 60.00' 60.00' 50.00' 3" W
" W
55.00' 50.00'
15.50'
.38'
00.38'
00.38'
0.38'
50.00' 50.00' 50.00' 55.00'
N 88° 40' 13" W 192.99'
N 02° 39' 27" W
14.82'
N 01° 19' 46" E
36.97'
L=149.51', R=270.00'
'=31° 43' 35"
S 87° 56' 29" W
57.85'
L=36.12', R=112.88'
'=18° 20' 02"
L=30.84', R=32.88'
'=53° 45' 27"
L=40.36', R=92.88'
'=24° 54' 02"
S 08° 55' 45" E 85.75'
S 10° 15' 30" W
16.83'
10.00'
N 4° 36' 50" E
19.76'
N 01° 19' 47" E 424.47'
SEE DETAIL 12B, SHEET 12
S 10° 03' 39" E
57.84'
L=59.48', R=112.87'
'=30° 11' 28"
S 33° 00' 10" E
6.25'
L=6.39', R=32.87'
'=11° 07' 46"
L=63.90', R=92.87'
'=39° 25' 24"
S 89° 11' 42" W
35.27'
L=22.91', R=179.13'
'=7° 19' 45"
N 83° 28' 33" W
28.09' N 56° 28' 45" W
11.08'
N 88° 40' 13" W
17.72'
S 88° 03' 48" W
54.64'
S 59° 18' 30" W
10.65'
S 88° 03' 48" W57.83'
L=48.23', R=112.88'
'=24° 28' 49"
L=18.33', R=32.87'
'=31° 57' 07"
L=52.58', R=92.87'
'=32° 26' 10"
S 00° 48' 19" E35.27'
L=22.91', R=179.12'
'=7° 19' 45"
S 06° 31' 26" W
26.99'
S 01° 19' 46" W 194.95'
S 01° 19' 47" W
48.00'
S 06° 47' 40" E 159.26'
L=22.91', R=179.13'
'=7° 19' 45"
S 01° 36' 00" E
26.99'
L=182.73', R=330.00'
'=31° 43' 35"
S 1° 56' 12" E
RADIAL
PT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AND STREET TREE EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
EASEMENT LEGEND
PT
10.00'
N 18° 19' 32" E
6.31'
N 01° 21' 59" E
20.00'
N 88° 34' 37" W
4.00'
L=10.38', R=35.00'
'=16° 59' 41"
S 88° 34' 36" E
3.99'
N 1° 20' 04" E 40.00' L=15.75', R=35.00'
'=25° 46' 43"
N 88° 40' 09" W
RADIAL
N 88° 37' 41" W 192.99'
N 4° 36' 50" E
19.76'
N 2° 39' 27" W
14.82'
S 65° 33' 21" W
RADIAL
LOT 426
1.65 ACRES
PUBLIC PARK
PHASE 5 OF MULTIPLE PHASES
IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF
THE AGREEMENT DECLARATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SLO AL 18-0013 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2018-025711 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE,
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA.
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES ®
11 14 OF SHEETS
0 50 100 25
SCALE
1 INCH = 50 FEET
TRACT MAP NO. 3089 PHASE 5
LEGEND
FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
SET 1" IRON PIPE CAPPED LS 8298, UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED
SET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED INTO THESTREET 0.20' FROM THE TRUE LOT CORNER. SEE DETAIL 10A ON SHEET 10 FOR OFFSET INFORMATION
SET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED 1.00' FROM THE
TRUE LOT CORNER ALONG THE LOT LINE. SEE DETAIL
10B, SHEET 10 FOR OFFSET INFORMATION
SET 2.5" BRASS CAP INSCRIBED LS 8298 IN STANDARD
CITY CENTERLINE IN MONUMENT WELL
M MEASURED
RAD RADIALR1 041/MB/048, DISTANCES REDUCE TO GRIDR2 TRACT 3089 PHASES 2 & 3, SURVEY IN PROGRESS SHEET 8
SHEET 9
DETAIL 11A
SCALE 1" = 20'
N 88°40'13" W 15.30'
S 83°28' 33" W 38.04'
N 87°57'15" W 61.79'
SHEET 12
L=166.12', R=300.00'
'=31° 43' 35"
L=22.91', R=179.13',
Δ= 7°19'45"
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES, LOT 437 OR PORTIONS THEREOF, ARE IN THE CURRENT 100-YEARFLOOD PLAIN. PORTIONS OF LOT 437 WILL BE OUT OF THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AFTER SITE
GRADING IS PERFORMED AND THE REVISED FLOODPLAIN IS RECOGNIZED BY FEMA (CLOMR CASE 22-09-0955R), AS SHOWN ON SHEET 14
100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN NOTE
20.17'
CITY
CITY-L
CITY-L
PT
PT
## ##
JESPERSEN ROAD
30.00' 30.00'
N 88° 32' 08" W 54.75' MN 88° 42' 07" E [54.74'] (R1)
FD 3.5" BRASS DISK CAP UNION OIL CO.
NO. 11 MON. IN CONCRETE LS 2019 (R5) FD #5 REBAR WITH ORANGE PLASTIC CAP LS 6192 DOWN 0.7' (R7)
FD #5 REBAR WITH CAP TAGGED RCE 12545 (R2)
S 11° 14' 51" W RADIAL
LOT 438
0.73 ACRES
OPEN SPACE
10.00'
LOT 439
1.16 ACRES
OPEN SPACE
10.00'
VENTURE DRIVE
B
B
30.00'
30.00'
∆=194° 45' 48"
40.63'
RAD11
° 27' 13" E 229.10' M & (R2)
N 88° 40' 13" W 173.83'
'
23" E
S 01° 19' 47" W 231.84'
S 24° 52' 43" E
6.25'
S 1° 56' 13" E
57.84'
L=48.23', R=112.88'
'=24° 28' 50"
L=18.33', R=32.87'
'=31° 57' 05"
S 78° 53' 34" E
19.04'
N 66° 23' 36" E
2.45'
L=31.29', R=90.88'
'=19° 43' 41"
S 88° 40' 13" E 153.49'
N 01° 19' 47" E 398.77'
N 06° 47' 40" W 522.87'
224.88'
S 88° 40' 13" E
N 88° 38' 54" W 147.09'
87.09' 60.00'
S 1° 19' 47" W 202.08'
S 06° 31' 27" W
26.99'
L=22.91', R=179.12'
'=7° 19' 45"
S 00° 48' 18" E
35.27'
L=52.58', R=92.88'
'=32° 26' 11"
L=18.33', R=32.87'
'=31° 57' 05"
S 88° 03' 48" W
43.94'
S 06° 47' 24" E
26.33'
S 1° 37' 01" W 601.54'
S 1° 37' 01" W 168.87' N 1° 37' 01" E 368.18' N 88° 36' 04" W 116.64' N 21° 10' 13" W 36.66' S 68° 49' 47" W 13.12'
25.19'
S 66° 10' 13" E
10.61'
N 86° 14' 54" E
15.82' L=66.96', R=91.43'
'=41° 57' 43"
L=6.16', R=30.88'
'=11° 25' 41"
S 22° 29' 48" E
12.33'
S 10° 03' 39" E
57.84'
N 6° 47' 24" W
74.24'
148.69'
S 88° 40' 13" E
116.02'
N 23° 49' 47" E
30.66'
L=48.23', R=112.88'
'=24° 28' 50"
L=46.31', R=110.87'
'=23° 55' 44"
S 88° 40' 13" E 115 50'
N 31° 10' 44" W
47.90'
L=42.21', R=161.34'
'=14° 59' 21"
24.00' 24.00'
S 88° 38' 54" E
14.64'
33.73' 30.77'
SEE DETAIL 12B, SHEET 12
E 159.26'
N 89° 11' 42" E
35.27'
L=22.91', R=179.13'
'=7° 19' 40"
S 83° 28' 33" E
29.81'
S 51° 48' 02" E9.58'
N 88° 03' 48" E
54.64'
N 59° 18' 30" E
10.65'
N 88° 03' 48" E
57.83'
S 75° 37' 38" W
12.33'
L=23.41', R=110.87'
'=12° 05' 50"
L=28.97', R=30.88'
'=53° 45' 27"
S 88° 40' 13" E
17.72'
L=20.73', R=90.87'
'=13° 04' 20"
S 02° 59' 00" W
19.04'
S 8° 55' 45" E
35.27'
L=22.91', R=179.13'
'=7° 19' 45"
S 01° 36' 00" E
26.99'
S 01° 19' 47" W
48.00'
S 30° 45' 05" W
RADIAL
S 11° 01' 24" W
RADIAL
N 0° 48' 13" WRADIAL
N 8° 10' 25" WRADIAL
N 87° 06' 02" W
RADIAL
S 3° 44' 30" E
RADIAL
N 3° 37' 00" W
RADIAL
PT
D
B
PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AND STREET TREE EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
EASEMENT LEGEND
DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER THIS MAPPUBLIC FOOTINGS AND ABUTMENTS EASEMENT PER THIS MAP L=5.43', R=19.00'
'=16° 22' 47"
N 88° 54' 21" W
13.00'
S 50° 41' 27" W
5.37'
N 88° 40' 04" W
3.82'
S 1° 19' 47" W
RADIAL
S 88° 03' 48" W
43.94'
LOT 439
1.16 ACRES
OPEN SPACE
PT
10.00'
D
S 33° 02' 39" E
6.27' S 83° 12' 20" W
2.00'
S 06° 47' 16" E
53.54'
N 83° 12' 44" E
4.78'
S 6° 47' 24" E 74.24'
PT
10.00'
47.91'
LOT 438
0.74 ACRES
OPEN SPACE
S 10° 03' 39" E
57.84'
PHASE 5 OF MULTIPLE PHASES
IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF
THE AGREEMENT DECLARATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SLO AL 18-0013 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2018-025711 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE,
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA.
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES ®
12 14 OF SHEETS
0 50 100 25
SCALE
1 INCH = 50 FEET
TRACT MAP NO. 3089 PHASE 5
LEGEND
FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
SET 1" IRON PIPE CAPPED LS 8298, UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED
SET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED INTO THESTREET 0.20' FROM THE TRUE LOT CORNER. SEE DETAIL 10A ON SHEET 10 FOR OFFSET INFORMATION
SET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED 1.00' FROM THE
TRUE LOT CORNER ALONG THE LOT LINE. SEE DETAIL
10B, SHEET 10 FOR OFFSET INFORMATION
SET 2.5" BRASS CAP INSCRIBED LS 8298 IN STANDARD
CITY CENTERLINE IN MONUMENT WELL
M MEASURED
RAD RADIALR1 041/MB/048, DISTANCES REDUCE TO GRIDR2 TRACT 3089 PHASES 2 & 3, SURVEY IN PROGRESSR5 028/CR/084R7 081/RS/032 SHEET 9
SHEET 11
SHEET 9DETAIL 12A
SCALE 1" = 10'
SEE DETAIL 12A, THIS SHEET
N 31°10'44" W 47.90' N 06°47'40" W
159.26'
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES, LOTS 438 AND 439, OR PORTIONS THEREOF, ARE IN THE CURRENT 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. PORTIONS OF THESE LOTS WILL BE OUT OF THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AFTER SITE GRADING IS PERFORMED AND THE REVISED FLOODPLAIN IS RECOGNIZED BY FEMA (CLOMR CASE 22-09-0955R), AS SHOWN ON SHEET 14 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN NOTE
DETAIL 12B
SCALE 1" = 20'
LOT 426
PUBLIC PARK
1.64 ACRES
LOT 434
OPEN SPACE
6.28 ACRES
HUGHES LANE
HUGHES LANE
EARHART WAY
YEAGER COURT
EARHART WAY
DOOLITTLE DRIVE
COLEMAN LANE
WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY
LOT 435
OPEN SPACE
7.32 ACRES
PUBLIC PARK
9789 S.F.
LOT 386
350 351 352 353 354 347 348 349 344 345 346 341 342 343 339 340 334 335 336 337 331 332 333 365 363 362 360 359 358 357 356 355
378 379 380 374 375 376 377 370 372 373
381 382 383 384 385 386
391
392
390
389
388
387
403
402
404 425
405 424
401
400 407
406
408 399
409 420 398
397 410 419
411 418 396
395
394
393
412
413
414
417
416
415
433432
431
430
429
428
427
368 369
367 366
386
423
422
421
361
371
364
338
SEE SHEET 9
SEE DETAIL 4C, SHEET 4
LOT 434
OPEN SPACE
6.28 ACRES
TL
S 77°15'53" W 103.03'
N 56°55'29" W 321.07' M&(R1)
N 38°53'59" W
206.27' M&(R1)
N 53°09'19" E
246.33' M&(R1)
N 11°35'26" E
154.29' M&(R1)
N 42°29'15" E
294.56' M&(R1)
S 70°47'31" E 436.23' M&(R2)
N 59°45'25" E
65.56' M&(R2)
N 11°13'10" E
273.26' M&(R2)
N 43°28'12" E 401.65' M&(R2)
N 82°27'13" E 229.10'
M&(R2) S 31°10'44" E 47.90'
LOT 436
0.84 ACRES
LOT 437
0.92 ACRES
LOT 438
0.74 ACRES
PUBLIC OPEN
SPACE
CITY-L CITY-L
N 82° 47' 49" W
RADIAL
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L
BUCKLEY ROAD
OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT.
RECORDED CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS MAP.
SEE DETAIL
11A, SHEET 11
D
N 61° 02' 29" E
85.32 N 84° 35' 36" E
95.14 S 83° 27' 45" E
88.95 N 66° 24' 22" E
220.54' N 88° 40' 13" W 1203.97'
N 1° 16' 58" E
145.14'
N 1° 19' 47" E
158.00'
S 88° 40' 13" E
100.00'
N 1° 19' 47" E
173.99'
S 1° 19' 47" W
122.93'
L11
C11
L=8.33', R=45.00'
'=10° 36' 04"
N 1° 19' 47" E
132.20'
N 79° 59' 39" E
113.69'
L17
L20
L21
L22
S 84° 43' 33" E
92.23 S 88° 40' 13" E30.97'
N 11° 34' 22" E
65.47'
L16
S 88° 33' 38" E
83.31'
N 33° 03' 21" E
162.24
C18
L=15.76', R=179.00'
L15
'=5° 02' 44"
RAD3
L=126.26', R=355.00'
∆=20° 22' 38"
L=40.33', R=72.00'
'=32° 05' 47"
C10
S 88° 40' 13" E 192.99'
S 1° 19' 47" W 424.61'
L=149.51', R=270.00'
'=31° 43' 35"
N 88° 22' 25" W
43.38'
S 01° 37' 01" W
58.31'
S 16° 12' 14" W59.82'
S 88° 42' 44" E 1319.38'
S 88° 42' 44" E 314.99'
N 88° 42' 44" W
77.45'
N 01° 19' 47" E
40.63'
PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES.RECORDED CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS MAP L
L
40' DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD EASEMENT FROM WILLIAM
BUCKLEY, ET AL TO COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO PER R9
20' 20'
EASEMENT LEGEND
TL TRAIL EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
B PUBLIC FOOTINGS AND ABUTMENTS EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
PT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AND STREET TREE EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
L LANDSCAPE, IRRIGATION, AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT PER THIS MAP
CURVE TABLE
CURVE #
C10
C11
C18
LENGTH
52.84'
8.33'
29.85'
RADIUS
72.00'
45.00'
19.00'
DELTA
42°02'53"
10°36'25"
90°00'00"
LINE TABLE
LINE
L11
L15
L17L20
L21
L22
LENGTH
14.27'
32.25'51.33'33.56'
42.21'
52.14'
BEARING
N59° 53' 18"E
S56° 56' 39"ES75° 19' 13"ES58° 00' 15"ES32° 45' 14"ES51° 07' 32"E
LINE TABLE
LINE #
RAD3
DIRECTION
S28° 00' 37"W
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES ®
13 14 OF SHEETS
0 100 200 50
SCALE
1 INCH = 100 FEET
TRACT MAP NO. 3089 PHASE 5
LEGEND
FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
SET 1 -INCH IRON PIPE CAPPED LS 8298, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDSET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED INTO THE STREET 0.20' FROM THE TRUE LOT CORNER. SEE DETAIL 10A ON SHEET 10 FOR OFFSET
INFORMATION
SET NAIL AND TAG LS 8298 PRODUCED 1.00' FROM THE TRUE LOT CORNER ALONG THE LOT LINE. SEE DETAIL 10B, SHEET 10 FOR OFFSET
INFORMATION
SET 2" BRASS CAP INSCRIBED LS 8298 IN STANDARD CITY CENTERLINE
IN MONUMENT WELL
M MEASUREDRAD RADIALR1 041/MB/048, DISTANCES REDUCE TO GRIDR2 TRACT 3089 PHASE 2 & 3, SURVEY IN PROGRESSR9 6/DEEDS/49 PHASE 5 OF MULTIPLE PHASES
IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF
THE AGREEMENT DECLARATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SLO AL 18-0013 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2018-025711 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE,
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA.
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES, LOTS 386-392, 398-401, 434, 438 AND 439 OR PORTIONS THEREOF, ARE IN THE CURRENT 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN, LOTS 386-392, 398-401, AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 434, 438, AND 439 WILL BE OUTOF THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AFTER SITE GRADING IS PERFORMED AND THE REVISED FLOODPLAIN IS RECOGNIZED BY FEMA (CLOMR CASE 22-09-0955R), AS SHOWN ON SHEET 14 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN NOTELOTS MAY HAVE THE BUILDING ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK UP TO 4.00 FEET.LOTS MAY HAVE THE BUILDING ENCROACH INTO THE REAR YARD SETBACK UP TO 1.50 FEET.
BUILDING SETBACK NOTES
SHEET 12
CIT
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L
CIT
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L
CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L CITY-L
CITY-L
HUGHES LANE
EARHART WAY
COLEMAN LANE
YEAGER CT.
DOOLITTLE DRIVE
VENTURE DR.
LANGLEY ST.
WRIGHT BROTHERS WAY
JESPERSEN RD.
FOXTROT CT.
PIPER LN.
VENTURE DR.
CESSNA CT. KITTY HAWK CT.
MEMPHIS BELLE WAY
EARTHWOOD LN
JESPERSEN RD.
EARTHWOOD LN
TANGO WAY
SKY KING DR.
BRAVO ST. ALPHA LN.
VENTURE DR.
CURRENT FEMA 100-YEAR
FLOOD PLAIN BOUNDARY FIRM
MAP 06079C1331H (06/06/2024)
TANK FARM CREEK
100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN BOUNDARY PER
AVILA RANCH DEVELOPMENT PHASES 2-6
CLOMR REPORT PREPARED BY WALLACE
GROUP (FEMA CASE NO. 22-09-0955R)
349 350 351 352 353 354 344 345 346 347 348 340 341 342 343 335 336 337 339 331 332 333 334 365 363 362 360 359 358 357 356 355
376 377 378 379 380 370 372 373 374 375
381 382 383 384 385 386
391
392
390
389
388
387
403
402
404 425
405 424
401
400 407
406
399 408
398 409 420
397 410 419
396 411 418395
394
393
412
413
414
417
416
415
433432
431
430
429
428
427
426
368 369
367 366
386
434
434
435
423
422
421
361
434
371
364
338
436
437
438
439
TANK FARM CREEK
BUCKLEY ROAD
(COUNTY ROAD A2089)
VACHELL LN
612 CLARION COURTwww.wallacegroup.usPLANNINGCONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREMECHANICAL ENGINEERINGPUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATIONSURVEYING / GIS SOLUTIONSWATER RESOURCES ®
14 14 OF SHEETS
0 ADDITIONAL MAP SHEET TRACT MAP NO. 3089 PHASE 5
LEGEND
ARTERIAL STREETS - ROAD CLASSIFICATION
LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS - ROAD CLASSIFICATION
FEMA 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN BOUNDARY (EXISTING)FEMA FUTURE CLOMR 100 YEAR BOUNDARY LINES
CITY LIMITS
THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES,
DESCRIBING CONDITIONS AS OF THE DATE OF FILING, AND IS NOT INTENDED TO AFFECT RECORD TITLE INTEREST.
THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS DERIVED FROM PUBLIC RECORDS
OR REPORTS AND DOES NOT IMPLY THE CORRECTNESS OR
SUFFICIENCY OF THOSE RECORDS OR REPORTS BY THE
SUMMARY TABLE PREPARER OF THE ADDITIONAL MAP SHEET.
NUMBER OF LOTS
(LOTS 331-439)
AVERAGE SINGLE
FAMILY LOT SIZE
(LOTS 331-385,
387-425, 427-433)
OPEN SPACE
LAND (LOTS 434,
435, 438 & 439)
PUBLIC PARK LAND(LOTS 386 AND 426)
109
5834
SQUARE
FEET
1.87 ACRES
15.50 ACRES
LOTS MAY HAVE THE BUILDING ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK UP TO 4.00 FEET.LOTS MAY HAVE THE BUILDING ENCROACH INTO THE REAR YARD SETBACK UP TO 1.50 FEET.
BUILDING SETBACK NOTES
NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS
1. THE OWNERS OF ALL LOTS AND UNITS WITHIN THIS MAP ARE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR
FUTURE RESIDENTIAL PARKING DISTRICT OR NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PROCESSING.
2. THE OWNERS OF ALL LOTS WHERE SIGHT LINES ARE SHOWN ON THE PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT PLANS ON FILE AT THE CITY OR ARE REQUIRED BY THE CITY'S MUNICIPAL CODE SHALL MAINTAIN SAID SIGHT LINES BY RESTRICTING FENCE ANDPLANTING HEIGHTS IN THOSE AREAS.
3. A FINAL LETTER OF MAP REVISION (LOMR) SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITHIN SIX (6) MONTHS OF THE COMPLETION OF GRADING AND THE LOMR MUST BE APPROVEDBY FEMA PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE.
NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL LOTS
(LOT 436 AND 437)
1.75 ACRES
CITY-L
PHASE 5 OF MULTIPLE PHASES
IN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL B OF
THE AGREEMENT DECLARATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT SLO AL 18-0013 RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 2018-025711 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE,
COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA.
1 SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT – TRACT 3089 PHASE 5
THIS SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT—TRACT 3089 PHASE 5 (this “Agreement”) is dated this ______ day of ___________2025 by and between MRP HTMB, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, herein referred to as "Subdivider," and the CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, herein referred to as the "City."
RECITALS
REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE to that certain proposed subdivision of real property in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, a description of which is shown on the Final Map of Tract 3089 Phase 5, City of San Luis Obispo, California, as approved by the City Council on the ____ day of ___________, 2025 (this “Subdivision”) .
The Subdivider desires that said Tract 3089 Phase 5 be accepted and approved as a Final Map pursuant to the Subdivision Regulations of the City of San Luis Obispo (Title 16 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code), and
It is a condition of said regulations that the Subdivider agree to install the Subdivision Improvements as set forth on the plans therefore.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
In consideration of the foregoing, the Subdivider does hereby agree to construct and install the following Subdivision Improvements (collectively “Subdivision Improvements”) in accordance with said Subdivision Regulations, and in accordance with approved plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, City of San Luis Obispo, (“Subdivision Improvement Plans and Specifications”) to wit:
2 1. CURB, GUTTERS AND SIDEWALKS
2. STREET BASE AND SURFACING
3. WATER MAINS, RECYCLED WATER MAINS and SEWER MAINS, including sewer laterals to the property line and water services to the curb stop.
4. LANDSCAPING
5. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
6. STREET LIGHTS
7. ELECTRIC, GAS, TELEPHONE AND CABLE TELEVISION: In addition to the inspection and approval of such facilities by the City, each public utility shall be required to file a letter stating that the Subdivider has properly installed all facilities to be provided by him, and that the said utility is prepared to provide service to residents upon request.
8. ANY & ALL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS shown on the Subdivision Improvement Plans and Specifications or required by project approvals.
All of the above facilities shall be installed in the locations designated by the City and in accordance with the Subdivision Improvement Plans and Specifications.
The lines and grades for all of said Subdivision Improvements shall be established by the Subdivider in accordance with the Subdivision Improvement Plans and Specifications.
The Subdivider agrees that the work of installing the above Subdivision Improvements shall begin within thirty (30) days from the date of recording of the final map, and that the work shall be completed within twenty-four (24) months of said recording date, unless an extension has been granted by the City, provided that if completion of said work is delayed by acts of God or labor disputes resulting in strike action, the Subdivider shall have an additional period of time equivalent to such period of delay in which to complete such work. Any extension of time hereunder shall not operate to release the surety on the Improvement Security (“Improvement Security” shall mean, collectively, the “Performance
3 Credit/Bond, Materials Bond, and/or Warranty Bond”) filed pursuant to this agreement. In this connection, the surety waives the provisions of Section 2819 of the Civil Code of the State of California.
No building permits will be issued nor occupancy granted after the expiration date of this Agreement, taking into account any authorized extensions, until completion and acceptance of all Subdivision Improvements unless specifically approved by the City.
The Subdivider does also agree to comply with the conditions established by the City Council and has paid the necessary fees as indicated on the attached Exhibits 1 and 2.
Setting of new survey monuments or resetting of disturbed monuments shall be in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 8771 et seq., of the Professional Land Surveyors Act, Chapter 15 of the Business and Professions Code of the State of California.
The Subdivider attaches hereto, as an integral part hereof, and as security for the performance of this Agreement, instrument(s) of credit or bond approved by and in favor of the City of San Luis Obispo, and conditional upon the faithful performance of this Agreement (“Performance Credit/Bond”). Said instrument(s) of credit or bond is/are in the amount(s) shown in Exhibit 2, which is the amount of the estimated cost of said Subdivision Improvements.
Subdivider agrees to remedy any defects in the Subdivision Improvements arising from faulty workmanship or materials or defective construction of said Subdivision Improvements occurring within twelve (12) months after acceptance thereof (“Warranty Period”). In accordance with Sections 66499.7 and 66499.9 of the Government Code of the State of California, upon final completion and acceptance of the work, City will release all but 10% of the Improvement Security in the form acceptable to the City as a warranty bond (“Warranty Bond”), with that amount being deemed sufficient to guarantee faithful
4 performance by the Subdivider of his obligation to remedy any defects in the Subdivision Improvements arising within a period of one year following the completion and acceptance thereof. The Subdivider shall submit a formal request to the City at the end of the warranty period and City shall provide Subdivider with a comprehensive list of any outstanding defects to be remedied by Subdivider. City shall release the Warranty Bond upon reinspection and confirmation of the completion of listed repairs.
Until such time as the Improvements are accepted by the City, The Subdivider shall be responsible for and bear the risk of loss to any of the improvements constructed or installed and will be responsible for the care of, maintenance of, and any damage to such improvements. The City shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or responsible for any accident, loss or damage, regardless of the cause, happening or occurrence to the Improvements specified in this Agreement prior to the acceptance of the Improvements. All such risks shall be the responsibility of, and are hereby assumed by, the Subdivider.
City’s acceptance of the improvements shall be deemed to have occurred on the date which the City Council shall, by resolution duly passed and adopted, accept said Subdivision Improvements according to the Subdivision Plans and Specifications, and any approved modifications thereto. Neither periodic nor progress inspections or approvals shall bind the City to accept said Subdivision Improvements or waive any defects in the same or any breach of this agreement.
“AS-BUILT” record drawings are to be submitted within four weeks of completion of construction and prior to City acceptance of the public improvements.
If the Subdivider fails to complete the work within the prescribed time, the Subdivider agrees that City may, at its option, declare the instrument of credit or bond
5 which has been posted by Subdivider to guarantee faithful performance, forfeited and utilize the proceeds to complete said Subdivision Improvements , or City may complete said Subdivision Improvements and recover the full cost and expense thereof from the Subdivider or his surety.
The Subdivider has deposited with the City a labor and materials surety or sureties in the amount of 50% of the above described Subdivision Improvements in accordance with State law (“Materials Bond”).
Said Subdivider shall pay an inspection fee for City to inspect the installation of said Subdivision Improvements, and to verify that they have been completed in accordance with the Subdivision Plans and Specifications.
If off-site dedication of property is necessary to facilitate the construction of the required Subdivision Improvements, the Subdivider and City shall adhere to the requirements of Section 6.04 of the Development Agreement adopted by the City Council on October 3, 2017 by Ordinance No. 1639 (2017 Series) with regards to acquiring said off-site dedication.
Pursuant to Title 16 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, entitled "Subdivisions," the Subdivision Plans and Specifications, and all other documents filed with the City by the Subdivider and approved by the City Engineer, shall be referred to for further particulars in interpreting and defining the obligations of the Subdivider under this agreement.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66474.9(b), the Subdivider shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and/or its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City and/or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul, the approval by the City of this Subdivision, and all actions
6 relating thereto, including but not limited to environmental review (“Indemnified Claims”).
The City shall promptly notify the Subdivider of any Indemnified Claim upon being presented with the Indemnified Claim and City shall fully cooperate in the defense against an Indemnified Claim.
Nothing in this Agreement waives or is intended to waive any enforcement right or remedy afforded the City by the Subdivision Map Act, including, but not limited to, reversion as provided in Government Code Section 66499.12.
It is understood and agreed by and between the Subdivider and the City hereto that this Agreement shall bind the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the respective Parties to this Agreement.
[signatures on following page]
7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by:
SUBDIVIDER
MRP HTMB, LLC,
A Delaware limited liability company,
By:____________________________
Name: Ed Hadley
Its: Authorized Signatory
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
Erica A. Stewart
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK Teresa Purrington
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY Christine Dietrick
8 EXHIBIT 1
TRACT 3089 PHASE 5
SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT
1. The Subdivider has deposited a monumentation security in the amount of $78,000 to guarantee the installation of survey monuments in accordance with the approved map and payment for same. Said guarantee will be released once the installation of monuments has been verified and that existing monuments have not been disturbed, and upon receipt by the City of a letter from the Surveyor indicating that they have completed the work and have been paid. Subdivider shall adhere to the requirements of California Business and Professions Code Section 8771 with regards to monument preservation. The monumentation security also guarantees the replacement of any monuments that were disturbed during construction, along with filing of Records of Survey or Corner Records required by said Section 8771.
2. Phase 5 provides sufficient parkland and park improvements to meet City requirements based on the projected population and housing onsite, so there are no "in-lieu" park fees required.
3. Water Impact Fees for irrigation water meters shown on the subdivision improvement plans shall be paid prior to subdivision improvement plan approval per Condition #59.
4. The Subdivider has elected to pay a roadway maintenance fee to satisfy the Conditions of Approval. The fee of $10,000 was approved by the City Engineer in accordance with City Engineering Standards and guidelines.
5. The Subdivider shall comply with all requirements of Council Resolution No. 10832 (2017 Series) approving the tentative map and Ordinance No. 1639 (2017 Series) approving the Development Agreement.
The original project approvals included several transportation infrastructure improvements that were required to be constructed prior to or in conjunction with Phase 4 of the development. With approval of the Phase 5 Final Map and proposal to advance Phase 5 development ahead of Phase 4, staff is recommending that the Council approve modifications to the project conditions of approval and Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) mitigation measures as follows:
6. Horizon Lane Improvements: Improvements to Horizon Lane between Suburban Road and Avila Ranch project boundary required per Mitigation Measure TRANS-4 and Condition of Approval #106.
Improvements previously required with Phase 4. Recommend retaining timing of improvements with Phase
4. Therefore, this item is not involved with Phase 5.
7. Suburban Road Improvements: Improvements to Suburban Road between Earthwood and Horizon Lane required per Mitigation Measure TRANS-4 and Condition of Approval #102. Improvements previously required with Phase 4. Recommend retaining timing of improvements with Phase 4. Therefore, this item is not involved with Phase 5.
8. Buckley Road Frontage Improvements: Widening of Buckley Road east of Tank Farm Creek
9 Bridge along project frontage required per Condition of Approval #107. Improvements previously required with Phase 4. Recommend modifying Conditions of Approval to require improvements with Phase 4 or Phase 5, whichever comes first. Design and Construction of all Buckley Road improvements along the project frontage from the Tank Farm Creek Bridge to the eastern site boundary, including but not limited to, a Class I path to the north side of the road and Class II bike lanes, shall be initiated prior to issuance of building permits for Phase 4 or Phase 5 development, whichever comes first. Improvements shall be completed no later than the issuance of an occupancy permit for the 50th residential unit of Phase 4 or Phase 5 development, whichever comes first.
9. Buckley Bicycle Bridge (South Side): Addition of bicycle bridge on north and south sides of Buckley Road crossing Tank Farm Creek required per Mitigation Measure TRANS-11 and Condition of Approval #109.
Original approvals required construction of both bridges with Phase 2. With approval of Phase 2-3 Final Map, timing of southern bridge was deferred to Phase 4 to be constructed concurrent with Buckley Road Widening. Recommend modifying Conditions of Approval to require construction of southern bridge prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for the 50th residential unit in Phase 4 or 5, whichever comes first.
Note that the bond for condition #109 was already collected with the Phase 2-3 final map recordation so no bond is needed for recordation of the Phase 5 map for the construction of the Buckley Bicycle Bridge (South Side).
10. Jespersen/Venture & Jespersen/Wright Brothers Roundabouts: Construction of roundabouts at Jespersen/Venture and Jespersen/Wright Brothers intersections required per Condition of Approval #110. Improvements previously required with Phase 4. Recommend modifying Conditions of Approval to require improvements with Phase4 or 5, whichever comes first.
10 EXHIBIT 2
TRACT 3089 PHASE 5 - FEE AND BOND LIST
175 VENTURE
Amount Form Date Received Bond Release Status
Bonds and Guarantees:
On-Site Faithful Performance: Can be released upon City Council acceptance of improvements, deposit of one-year warranty surety, and approval of record drawings.
Subdivision Improvements
(FMAP-0382-2022)
Includes all Parks
$31,295,400 Bond
Off-Site Faithful Performance:
Can be released upon Public Works Director acceptance of improvements, deposit of one-year warranty surety, and approval of record drawings.
Buckley Road Frontage Improvements
(COA 107) is a County permit and
bonding will be satisfied as required by
County
N/A N/A
Horizon Lane Improvements:
Improvements to Horizon Lane
between Suburban Road and Avila
Ranch project boundary required per
Mitigation Measure TRANS-4 and
Condition of Approval #106
N/A N/A for bond since #106 goes with
Phase 4
Suburban Road Improvements:
Improvements to Suburban Road
between Earthwood and Horizon Lane
required per Mitigation Measure
TRANS-4 and Condition of Approval
#102
N/A N/A for bond since #102 goes with
Phase 4
Buckley Bicycle Bridge (South Side):
Addition of bicycle bridge on north and
south sides of Buckley Road crossing
Tank Farm Creek required per
Mitigation Measure TRANS-11 and
Condition of Approval #109
N/A N/A for bond since #109 goes with
Phase 2-3 already bonded for.
Jespersen/Venture & Jespersen/Wright
Brothers Roundabouts: Construction of
roundabouts at Jespersen/Venture and
Jespersen/Wright Brothers intersections
required per Condition of Approval
#110
N/A N/A for bond since scope of work is
part of subdivision improvement
plans under FMAP-0382-2022
Labor & Materials (50% of cost of each
of the above improvements)
Can be released 90 days after
acceptance of improvements, if no
claims. (Civil Code Section 8412)
11 Subdivision Improvements
(FMAP-0382-2022)
Includes all Parks
$31,295,400/2
= $15,647,700 Bond
Off-Site Labor & Materials:
Can be released upon Public Works Director acceptance of improvements, deposit of one-year warranty surety, and approval of record drawings.
Buckley Road Frontage Improvements
(COA 107) is a County permit and
bonding will be satisfied as required by
County
N/A N/A
Jespersen/Venture & Jespersen/Wright
Brothers Roundabouts: Construction of
roundabouts at Jespersen/Venture and
Jespersen/Wright Brothers intersections
required per Condition of Approval
#110
N/A
Monument Guarantee $78,000 CD or
Letter of
Credit
Can be released upon verification that
monuments have been set and
surveyor has been paid.
10% Warranty 10% of On-Site Faithful Performance above
To be collected prior to release of Faithful
Performance Bonds
Can be released one-year after
acceptance of improvements.
12 Fees:
Plan and Map Check Fees:
Map Check Fee FMAP-0132-2024
Balance Due
$39,221.07
$0
Check 3/20/2024 Paid in full (includes $1,160.80 in IT
Surcharge fees)
Improvement Plan check Fee:
FMAP‐ 0382-2022
Design Exceptions (3 X $330.81)
IT surcharge
Total
$135,458.96
$992.43
$4,171.86
$140,623.25
Check
Check
Check
8/1/2022
7/14/2025
7/14/2025
Paid in full
Paid in full
Paid in full
Construction Inspection Fees
Construction Inspection Fee:
FMAP‐ 0382-2022
Balance Due
IT surcharge: N/A
$381,471.05 Check 7/14/2025 Paid in full
Impact Fees
Roadway Maintenance Fee $10,000 To be deposited in Acct # 40050300- 90346953 Streets Reconstruction and
Resurfacing Master per Matt Horn
Water Impact Fees for irrigation
meters
Park H, 1” Recycled Irrigation Service $30,091.36
2” Recycled Irrigation Service
for Jespersen Streetscape
$95,586.53
3/4” Recycled Irrigation Service for
Berm in Lot 435
$17,701.14
Park I, 1” Domestic Irrigation Service $30,091.36
2” Domestic Irrigation Service
for Streetscape and Paseo
$95,586.53
Commercial Lots – 1” Recycled
Irrigation Service at each Lot
N/A
DEFERRED
Water Impact fee for commercial lots
deferred. To be paid with building
permits for these locations, at fee cost
in place at time of issuance.
Ad Hoc and Mitigation Fees
13 Buckley/Vachell Fair Share Mitigation
(COA 116.g)
$13,884.05 Mitigation fees for Phase 5
residential units due with map
recordation. Based on % of total
unit count in that phase (relative
portion of $108,798).
Buckley/Vachell Fair Share Mitigation
(COA 116.g)
$25,024.17 Mitigation fees for Phase 6
commercial units due with map
recordation. Phase 6 units now part
of Phase 5 map. Based on % of total
unit count in that phase (relative
portion of $108,798).
Other Ad Hoc and Mitigation Fees Paid with Phase 1 Avila Ranch Affordable Housing Requirements See Affordable Housing Agreement Water Impact Fee1 To be collected with building permit
Wastewater Impact Fee1 To be collected with building permit Transportation Impact Fee1 To be collected with building permit
1 All Impact Fees are adjusted annually (July 1) based on CPI. Credit given for demolished units.
Item 6f
Department: Utilities
Cost Center: 6004
For Agenda of: 9/16/2025
Placement: Consent
Estimated Time: NA
FROM: Aaron Floyd, Utilities Director
Prepared By: Nick Teague, Water Resources Program Manager SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR PROPOSITION 1 INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT (IRWM) ROUND 2
IMPLEMENTATION GRANT
RECOMMENDATION
1. Adopt a Draft Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, approving the application for grant funding from the Proposition 1, Round 2 Integrated Regional Water Management Implementation Grant” (Attachment A); and
2. Authorize the Director of Utilities, or his designee, carry out the City’s responsibilities under the funding agreement and to sign the funding agreement for the Implementation Phase of the Project and any amendments thereto, on behalf of the City.
REPORT-IN-BRIEF
The City’s Groundwater Contamination Characterization Project Implementation Phase will provide added resiliency to the City’s water resources, while also removing PCE contamination from the groundwater within the basin. Through various grant agreements and amendments and City Council authorizations, the project budget has expanded to meet project needs. The current project budget is $11,175,379, including $7,782,800 in grant funding and $3,392,579 in City funding. The latest engineering estimates have identified the need for an additional $1.8 million to complete the construction phases of the project. While staff are planning to complete the Monitoring Well Project (Phase 1) and Well Drilling Project (Phase 2), carry over remaining contingencies from those projects into the budget for the Well Equipping Project (Phase 3), and break Phase 3 into a base bid and an additive alternates to ensure the City has the flexibility to deliver a complete project within the available budget, staff are also looking for supplemental funding. As such, staff are requesting authorization to apply for up to $1 million in funding through the Proposition 1, Round 2 Integrated Regional Water Management Implementation Grant.
Item 6f
POLICY CONTEXT
The Groundwater Contamination Characterization Project Implementation Phase (Implementation Phase) aims to design and equip groundwater wells with treatment systems capable of removing tetrachloroethylene (PCE) contamination, and to put the City’s available groundwater to beneficial use as a drinking water source while removing PCE contamination from local groundwater supplies. The Implementation Phase is consistent with the City’s adopted General Plan Water and Wastewater Element (WWE) Goals A 2.1 and A 3.1 as providing an additional reliable water supply source helps to ensure a long-term, reliable water supply and manages the City’s water resources to meet both current and future water demand associated with development envisioned by the General Plan. Specifically, Policy A 3.2.3 states that “the City will continue to use groundwater to enhance the resiliency of the City’s water supply portfolio”.
Under Section 740 of the Financial Management Manual (Grant Management Policy), Council approval is required for all grant applications in excess of $5,000.
DISCUSSION
Background
Use of available groundwater resources would improve resiliency in the City’s water supply portfolio. Based on estimates published in the San Luis Obispo Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Plan, the City anticipates about 700 acre-feet of groundwater is available for use each year. The City does not currently use groundwater as a drinking water source but considers groundwater as a valuable water resource that will help the City meet its future water supply resiliency goals. Local groundwater quality sampling has documented areas of the San Luis Obispo Valley Groundwater Basin underlying the City that have localized groundwater contamination from PCE. PCE contamination restricts the City’s use of groundwater as a source of drinking water and must be treated before the City can utilize this resource. PCE is a chemical that is typically associated with dry cleaners, textile operations, and metal degreasing activities. The origin of the contamination remains unknown; however, it is not believed to be from a facility owned by the City of San Luis Obispo.
In July 2020, the City received a $1,996,575 grant through Round 1 (Planning Phase) of the State of California Proposition 1 Groundwater Grant Program to study PCE contamination of the groundwater basin. The State’s program provides funding for grants and loans for projects that prevent and clean up contamination of groundwater that serves, or will serve, as a source of drinking water. A detailed understanding of the extent of PCE contamination and remediation options were necessary steps in fully utilizing the City’s ground water supplies. The total Planning Phase cost including the City’s local match was over $2 million. The Planning Phase of the Groundwater Contamination Characterization Project, including completion of a Remedial Investigation Report (PCE Plume Characterization Project Summary), Feasibility Study Report for the PCE Plume Characterization Project, and submittal of all documentation required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) for reimbursement, was completed April 12, 2023.
Item 6f
In September 2021, staff submitted a conceptual proposal through the Proposition 1 Groundwater Grant Program indicating the City’s interest in additional grant funding for the Project’s Implementation Phase (Round 3 of the Proposition 1 Groundwater Grant Program). In April 2022, the SWRCB invited the City to submit a full grant application for the Implementation Phase of the Groundwater Contamination Characterization Project.
The grant application for the Implementation Phase was submitted July 2022, and the refined estimated budget was $6,607,850. On March 13, 2023, staff received a preliminary grant award letter from the SWRCB in the amount of $5,877,765, the full amount requested in the grant application (Attachment B). The award of the grant from the SWRCB required a local match of $730,085. On August 30, 2023, the City received a memo from the SWRCB that informed the City that SWRCB waived the match requirement for the City’s Implementation Phase ($730,085; Attachment C). The grant agreement was signed and executed on February 14, 2024, funding the full project budget amount of $6,607,850 (as estimated in 2024) with grant funding.
On December 18, 2024, the City requested additional grant funding through the Proposition 1 Groundwater Grant Program to cover increased costs for tasks primarily related to design, engineering, and construction of the new extraction wells and groundwater treatment facility. In February 2025, the SWRCB notified the City that it was awarded an additional $1,174,950 in grant funding to the Implementation Phase of the Groundwater Contamination Characterization Project. The grant agreement (Attachment D) was signed and executed on February 14, 2025, providing a total of $7,782,800 in grant funding.
In March 2025, the City’s consultant, WSC, notified the City that they were projecting a need for additional funding to complete design-phase services and engineering support during construction. To clarify the scope of work needed to complete the project, and to avoid additional budget overruns, the City provided WSC with a request for proposal with a fixed-fee cost. In their proposal, WSC estimated that an additional $943,283 (for a total fee of $1,885,760) is needed to complete the full scope of work for professional engineering services needed during the Implementation Phase of the project and grant (Attachment E).
Additionally, as WSC progressed through the engineering and design of the Implementation Phase, revised costs for the construction phases have increased above the original estimates. The estimated construction costs for all three phases of the project exceed the currently available funding by about $1.8 million. Accounting for construction contingencies, the plan is to complete the Monitoring Well Project (Phase 1) and Well Drilling Project (Phase 2), carry over remaining contingencies from those projects into the budget for the Well Equipping Project (Phase 3), and break the Well Equipping Project into a base bid and an additive alternates to ensure the City has the flexibility to deliver a complete project within the available budget. Part of that flexibility in Phase 3 will include value engineering, identification of a base bid construction scope, alternate materials that are more economical, and a strategy of additive alternates that can be implemented as the construction risk factors associated with unforeseen conditions are eliminated.
Item 6f
Proposition 1 IRWM Round 2 Implementation Grant
Senate Bill 1672 established the Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Act in 2002, intended to promote collaborative and integrated management of water resources.
Proposition 1 was established to provide funding toward the IRWM Program administered by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR).
Under the IRWM program, a Regional Water Management Group (RWMG) is responsible for local water management planning efforts within each IRWM region. The San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) and County, together with other local agencies and organizations, formed the RWMG for the San Luis Obispo County IRWM region. The District serves as the lead agency in accordance with the IRWM Program Participants Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), conducts project/program solicitations and evaluations, and makes recommendations on grant funding allocations.
On November 2, 2022, the County Board of Supervisors (Board) approved filing an application and entering into agreements for the Proposition 1, Round 2 IRWM Grant, identifying five projects recommended by the RWMG for funding (Attachment F). On May 18, 2023, DWR awarded $3,782,129 in grant funding to the San Luis Obispo County IRWM region based on the District’s application. The District, as grantee, executed a Grant Agreement with DWR on December 7, 2023.
Significant deviations in scope, a delay in construction, and a reduction in benefits for the Central Coast Blue project jeopardized the utilization of $1 million in Proposition 1 grant funds. In response, the District requested and received direction from the Board on July 8, 2025, to return to the Board with a proposed project, or suite of projects, to replace the Central Coast Blue project.
Staff are requesting authorization from the City Council to apply for the full $1 million available through this grant opportunity, which would provide supplemental funding for full implementation of the Groundwater Contamination Characterization Project.
Previous Council or Advisory Body Action
The City Council authorized staff to prepare and submit a grant application for the Groundwater Contamination Characterization Project (Round 1 – Planning Phase) on February 5, 2019.
On December 7, 2021, the City Council approved and authorized specifications for the Planning Phase of the Groundwater Contamination Characterization Project and award of the construction contract; staff preparation and submittal of the grant application for the Implementation Phase (Round 3) of the Project; funding for application preparation and a local match of a maximum of 10 percent of the total project cost; execution of grant application documents; and a Resolution entitled “A Resolution authorizing entering into a Funding Agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board and authorizing and designating a representative for Phase 3 of the Groundwater Contamination Characterization Project.”
Item 6f
On May 16, 2023, the City Council approved and authorized the use of up to $1,142,579 of City funding for the local match requirement (that was required at that time, but later waived by the SWRCB), and any potential increases in costs related to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) compliance, construction, and materials costs and associated inflation; execution of required grant, consultant, and construction-related agreements; and change orders and contract agreements for the project, not to exceed a cumulative total of $7,020,344 (including $5,877,765 of grant funding).
On March 4, 2025, the City Council approved the project plans and special provisions for the Groundwater Well Drilling Project (a component of the Groundwater Project); adopted a resolution recommending adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Groundwater Contamination Characterization Project; and authorized the City Manager to approve contract amendments for the project, not to exceed a cumulative total of $7,750,429.
On May 5, 2025, the City Council authorized advertisement and award of the Monitoring Well Drilling Project (a component of the Groundwater Project) and authorized contract amendments for the project not to exceed a cumulative total of $8,925,379 ($7,782,800 grant funding, $1,142,579 City funding, based on the increase in grant funding approved by the SWRCB in February 2025).
On June 17, 2025, the City Council adopted the 2025-26 Financial Plan, which included an additional $2,500,000 from the Water Fund’s Unreserved Working Capital account for the Groundwater Project. This brought the total project funding to $11,175,379, including $7,782,800 in grant funding and $3,392,579 in City funding.
Public Engagement
A public forum was held on December 10, 2024, at the Public Library meeting room. At the public forum, staff from the City and its consultants presented on this project, and additional forthcoming projects that will collectively result in new infrastructure, which will provide clean groundwater for use as a new water source for the City. As a result of the public forum, the Groundwater Contamination Characterization Project was highlighted in an article by the San Luis Obispo Tribune.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
On March 4, 2025, City Council adopted a Resolution to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Groundwater Contamination Characterization Project. This Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was prepared for the “whole of the action” of the Groundwater Contamination Characterization Project, which includes the Groundwater Well Drilling Phase, a Monitoring Well Drilling Phase, and a Well Equipping Phase. The environmental review process complied with all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act statute and guidelines, including but not limited to Native American tribal consultation, noticing requirements, public circulation of the document, availability of the environmental
Item 6f
document at the City Utilities Department office and the City website, and filing of the Notice of Determination (NOD). The recommended action does not change the scope of the project and is consistent with the previously adopted IS/MND and NOD.
FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: Yes Budget Year: 2025-26
Funding Identified: Yes
Fiscal Analysis:
The table below outlines the costs to complete the Groundwater Contamination Characterization Project within the available budget amounts that were authorized by City Council on March 4, 2025 and in the City’s 2025-2027 Financial Plan.
Available Project Budget (CIP Account No. 2091506)
Proposition 1 Groundwater Grant $7,782,800
Additional Funding (2091506)1 $3,392,579
Expenditures to date2($2,086,716)
Total Budget Remaining $9,088,663
Estimated Construction Cost for Phase 1 – Monitoring Wells $582,090 Estimated Construction Cost for Phase 2 – Groundwater Well Drilling $829,740 Estimated Base Bid Cost for Phase 3 – Equipping $7,676,833 Estimated Additive Alternate Cost for Phase 3 - Equipping $1,802,167 Total Estimated Construction Costs (Phases 1 – 3) $10,890,830 The estimated costs for full project implementation exceed the currently available funding by about $1.8 million. The total potential award amount from the Proposition 1, Round 2 IRWM Implementation Grant is $1 million. If awarded, this additional funding will be used to fund costs associated with the project’s construction phases, including the Phase 3 additive alternate.
Meanwhile, staff are planning to carry contingencies from the Groundwater Well Drilling and Monitoring Well projects into the budget for the Well Equipping Project. The total of the contingencies included in the Groundwater Well Drilling and Monitoring Well projects is $101,740. The Well Equipping Project will be broken into a base bid and an additive alternate to ensure the project’s base bid can be awarded within the currently available budget. The Well Equipping Project also includes contingencies equal to about $1.12 million.
ALTERNATIVES
Deny authorization to apply for grant funding. City Council could decide to deny authorization to apply for grant funding. If Council denies the recommended authorization, staff will continue to look for other opportunities for grant funding and supplemental funds.
1 Includes $1,142,579 previously allocated for this project and $2,250,000 recently approved by City Council in the City’s 2025-2027 Financial Plan.
2 Includes $943,283 needed to complete design-phase services and engineering support during construction.
Item 6f
Without any supplemental grant funding the City will need to fund the remainder of the project from the Water Fund or risk not completing the project as described in the Proposition 1 Groundwater Grant Program agreement, which would result in noncompliance and potential recoupment of grant funding.
ATTACHMENTS
A - Draft Resolution authorizing submittal of an application for grant funding from the Proposition 1, Round 2 Integrated Regional Water Management Implementation Grant
B - Preliminary Proposition 1 Groundwater grant award letter C - Memo from the State Water Resources Control Board waiving the City’s local match requirement for Proposition 1 Groundwater grant funding D - Revised Proposition Groundwater grant agreement, executed on February 14, 2025 E - Proposal – PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation, Specification #2091506
F - Board of Supervisors of the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Resolution No. 2022-254
R ______
RESOLUTION NO. _____ (2025 SERIES)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS
OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDING FROM THE PROPOSITION 1, ROUND 2 INTEGRATED
REGIONAL WATER MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION GRANT
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo relies upon multiple surface water resources to meet its water supply needs; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has a goal of providing an additional reliable water supply source helps to ensure a long-term, reliable water supply and manages the City’s water resources to meet both current and future water demand associated with development envisioned by the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo has received $7,782,800 in grant funding from the State Water Resources Control Board, Proposition 1 Groundwater Grant Program for funding the Groundwater Contamination Characterization Project (Project), Implementation Phase; and
WHEREAS, the City is contributing $3,392,579 from the Water Fund towards projects and activities of the Groundwater Contamination Characterization Project (Project), Implementation Phase; and
WHEREAS, the City has identified that additional funding is needed to complete the Groundwater Contamination Characterization Project (Project), Implementation Phase as described in the grant funding agreement between the City of San Luis Obispo and the State Water Resources Control Board; and
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, acting as the lead agency for the Regional Water Management Group, is soliciting applications for grant funding through the Proposition 1, Round 2 Integrated Regional Water Management Implementation Grant; and
WHEREAS, additional funding awarded through the Proposition 1, Round 2 Integrated Regional Water Management Implementation Grant would reduce the need for the City to contribute additional funding from the Water Fund for completion of the Project Implementation Phase.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:
SECTION 1. The City of San Luis Obispo is hereby authorized to prepare and submit a grant application for Proposition 1, Round 2 Integrated Regional Water Management Implementation Grant funding for the Project, enter into a funding agreement with the State Water Resources Control Board, and accept and expend State funds for the Implementation Phase of the Project.
Resolution No. _____ (2025 Series) Page 2
R ______
SECTION 2. The Director of Utilities, or designee, is hereby authorized and designated to sign, for and on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo, the funding agreement for the Implementation Phase of the Project and any amendments thereto.
SECTION 3. The Director of Utilities, or designee, is hereby authorized and designated to represent the City of San Luis Obispo in carrying out the City of San Luis Obispo’s responsibilities under the funding agreement, including certifying invoices and disbursement requests for Project costs on behalf of the City of San Luis Obispo and in compliance with applicable state and federal laws.
SECTION 4. Any and all actions, whether previously or subsequently taken by the City of San Luis Obispo, which are consistent with the intent and purposes of the foregoing resolution, shall be, and hereby are, in all respects, ratified, approved, and confirmed.
Upon motion of Council Member ___________, seconded by Council Member ___________, and on the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
The foregoing resolution was adopted this _____ day of _______________ 2025. ___________________________
Mayor Erica A. Stewart
ATTEST:
______________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________. ___________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
State Water Resources Control Board
March 6, 2023
Mr. Aaron Floyd
City of San Luis Obispo
Utilities Department
879 Morro Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
[email protected]
PROPOSITION 1 GROUNDWATER GRANT PROGRAM (GWGP) ROUND 3
IMPLEMENTATION GRANT SOLICITATION, NOTIFICATION OF AWARD Dear Mr. Floyd:
Congratulations! The Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) Plume Characterization Implementation Project (Project) has been approved for funding with a grant award of $5,877,765.
The Project consists of preparing a fate and transport groundwater model of the PCE plume, siting and construction of 2 extraction and treatment wells, and installation of a minimum of 8 monitoring wells to monitor the long-term progress of treatment within the City of San Luis Obispo (City).
The Project has been reviewed by technical experts from the State Water Resources Control Board’s (State Water Board) Division of Financial Assistance (Division), the Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the State Water Board’s Division of Drinking Water. The technical experts concur that the Project, as proposed, should achieve the stated objectives and is eligible for funding per the GWGP Guidelines, as amended on February 2, 2021.
Based on staff’s review of the City’s request for a reduced match, supporting information provided in the Full Proposal, and the GWGP Guidelines, Table 2, the City qualifies for a reduced match of eleven percent (11%) because one hundred percent (100%) of the Project benefits a Disadvantaged Community or Economically Distressed Area.
Robin Guillot has been assigned as the Project Manager for this Project. You will receive an introductory email from an assigned Program Analyst with further information about roles and responsibilities, grant agreement development, invoicing, deliverables, performance measures, and reporting requirements. You will also be contacted by your assigned Project Manager to ensure that all conditions and comments are addressed
Mr. Floyd - 2 -
prior to execution of the final grant agreement. We encourage your prompt response to any requests from our staff because unreasonable delays or failure to respond could result in withdrawal of this grant award.
Your grant award is conditioned on the successful negotiation of a grant agreement.
The agreement process will begin with the finalization of a scope of work and budget that is acceptable to the Division. The scope of work will be based on the Full Proposal; however, the Division may require changes to the scope of work and budget as part of the grant agreement negotiation process. Based on the technical review of the Full Proposal, staff have initially identified the following item(s) that will need to be addressed.
Key information to be provided prior to execution of the grant agreement:
1. Additional documentation regarding monitoring requirements and a detailed description of the remediation technology intended to be used for the Project.
2. Documents omitted from the Full Proposal including an up-to-date Project Director Certification form signed by the City’s Authorized Representative.
Thank you for your consideration in addressing these items with Division staff. We look forward to working with you on this Project. Please contact the assigned Project Manager, Robin Guillot, with any questions at (916) 319-8259, or [email protected].
Sincerely,
Joe Karkoski, Deputy Director
Division of Financial Assistance
cc: see next page
Joe Karkoski Digitally signed by Joe Karkoski
Date: 2023.03.06 10:48:31
-08'00'
Mr. Floyd - 3 -
cc: Christopher Stevens
Division of Financial Assistance
Kim Dinh
Division of Financial Assistance
Alex Huang
Division of Financial Assistance
Robin Guillot
Division of Financial Assistance
Debbie Cheung
Division of Financial Assistance
Andrew Nevis
Office of Legislative Affairs
Jeff Densmore
Division of Drinking Water
Katie McNeill
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Dean Thomas
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Daniel Ellis
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Miguel Barcenas
City of San Luis Obispo
[email protected]
State Water Resources Control Board
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Joe Karkoski
Deputy Director
DIVISION OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
Alex Huang
Senior Engineering Geologist
DIVISION OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
August 29, 2023
SUBJECT: REVISED - PROPOSITION 1 GROUNDWATER GRANT PROGRAM (GWGP) ROUND 3 FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS
BACKGROUND
The GWGP Round 3 full proposal solicitation window opened on April 14, 2022, and closed on July 15, 2022. Technical reviewers from several state agencies scored each proposal according to the rubric in Appendix F of the GWGP guidelines. On February 9, 2023, the Deputy Director of the Division of Financial Assistance (DFA) approved staff’s recommendation to award funding for eight projects and to not award funding for the Central Coast Blue project (Attachment A). DFA issued funding award letters for the eight Round 3 projects approved for funding. On March 17, 2023, DFA issued a funding denial letter for the Central Coast Blue project (Attachment B).
The following new developments occurred after the Deputy Director of DFA approved staff’s recommendation:
1. DFA received an urgent appeal letter from the City of Pismo Beach (City) regarding the funding determination for the Central Coast Blue project on March 23, 2023 (Attachment C). Staff met with the City in person on April 5, 2023, and again via Teams on April 25, 2023, to discuss the project and its nexus to the cleanup or prevention of groundwater contamination. The City initially asked for $35.7 million in its proposal, then reduced the request to $18.5 million in its appeal letter. Most recently, in an email dated May 24, 2023, the City asked DFA to reconsider an approval of $8 million in GWGP funding (Attachment D).
2. The GWGP Guidelines were amended on May 2, 2023, to allow the Deputy Director of DFA discretion to completely waive the match requirements for Round 3 projects that benefit disadvantaged communities (DACs) and severely disadvantaged communities (SDACs), to the extent authorized by statute.
Joe Karkoski - 2 -
ANALYSIS: REVISED FUNDING RECOMMENDATION FOR CITY OF PISMO BEACH’S CENTRAL COAST BLUE PROJECT
DFA staff have re-evaluated the City’s proposed Central Coast Blue project (Project) and concluded that the Project is eligible for GWGP funding, and recommend providing $8 million in Prop 1 GWGP funding.
By statute, projects that prevent contamination of groundwater that has served, or serves, as a source of drinking water are eligible. (Wat. Code, § 79771.) This project would prevent groundwater contamination that has served, and serves, as a source of drinking water by providing groundwater recharge to protect against contamination.
Under the GWGP Guidelines, projects that provide groundwater recharge to prevent or reduce contamination of municipal or domestic wells, or that consist of groundwater injection to prevent seawater intrusion, are specifically listed as eligible project types. (GWGP Guidelines, § 4.4, subds. d and e.) Although the available information indicates that the communities’ voluntarily reduced pumping has reduced the likelihood of seawater intrusion, seawater intrusion would cause substantial adverse impacts to this water supply. Based on the eligibility criteria in the statute and GWGP Guidelines, the Project is eligible.
Staff have determined that $8 million in funding is appropriate, but not the full requested amount of $35.7 million, based on the following considerations. The City and other local governments have successfully forestalled the immediate threat of groundwater degradation because the City and its partner agencies have diligently conserved water and reduced their groundwater pumping rates. As a result, the Project scored lower than the other proposals evaluated for Prop 1 GWGP funding. As discussed in the next section, there are insufficient remaining Prop 1 GWGP funds to cover the entire $35.7 million request.
However, DFA staff have determined that the benefits of the project are significant enough to justify a GWGP grant. Future precipitation is unpredictable. During critically dry years, dwindling surface water supplies may force the City and other local governments to increase pumping rates, resulting in overdraft of the groundwater basin.
The Project aims to prevent situations like this from happening. Additionally, the potential for the Project to enhance local water supply reliability and address the urgent need for an alternative water supply cannot be overlooked. The Project supports the priorities of Proposition 1 by enhancing water supply reliability (Wat. Code, § 79771(b)(3)), promoting groundwater recharge (Wat. Code, § 79771(b)(4)), and by allowing California to adapt to changing hydrologic conditions brought on by climate change (Wat. Code, § 79770). The project also aligns with California’s Water Supply Strategy and conforms with Executive Order N-3-23.
Therefore, staff recommend providing $8 million in Prop 1 GWGP funding for the Central Coast Blue Project.
Joe Karkoski - 3 -
ANALYSIS: MATCH WAIVERS
The Prop 1 GWGP Guidelines set aside funds for projects benefiting DACs and SDACs as required by statute. The rest of the funds may be used for any projects eligible for Prop 1 GWGP, regardless of disadvantaged status (generic funds). The set-aside funds for projects benefitting DACs were exhausted after the initial award of Round 3 projects, and only one Round 3 project benefits an SDAC. Waiving the match requirement for eligible Round 3 projects would enable the GWGP to commit an additional $6.2 million from the generic funds and $1 million from the SDAC set-aside funds.
CONCLUSIONS
If the Deputy Director of DFA approves the $8 million request from the City and waives the match requirement for all eligible Round 3 DAC and SDAC projects, there would be $13.3 million remaining in generic funds, and $20.8 million left in the SDAC set-aside.
These funds may be used to fund additional cost increases for existing projects, or to fund new drinking water treatment or wastewater projects that serve SDACs.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following:
1. Award GWGP funds for the Central Coast Blue Project and waive match for all Round 3 projects that serve DACs and an SDAC that are eligible for the match waiver (a total of five projects) as shown in Table 1. One DAC project would not qualify for match waiver, as explained in the footnote. The non-DAC projects do not qualify for a match waiver under the amended Guidelines. $635,900,000
$20,800,000 $13,300,000
Prop 1 GWGP Funds Remaining After
Waiving Match and Funding Central
Coast Blue
Committed SDAC Set-Aside Remaining Generic Funds Remaining
Joe Karkoski - 4 -
TABLE 1 – GWGP Round 3 Revised Funding Recommendations
Applicant Proposal Title DAC
Status
Funding
approved
2/9/23
Match
waiver
Revised
funding
amount
City of Dinuba Wellfield Groundwater
Quality Improvement and
Sustainability Project
SDAC $9,541,601 Waive $10,611,819
City of Turlock Downtown Turlock PCE
Project
DAC $14,640,045 Waive $17,269,997
City of El Monte* Former Crown City Plating
Site
DAC $1,901,250 Do not
waive
$1,901,250
(No change)
San Gabriel
Basin Water
Quality Authority
Whitmore Street
Groundwater Remediation
Facility Expansion
Implementation
DAC $1,850,735 Waive $3,701,470
City of Modesto Municipal Groundwater
Supply Contamination
Prevention and Cleanup
DAC $8,445,035 Waive $9,434,145
City of San Luis
Obispo
PCE Plume
Characterization
DAC $5,877,765 Waive $6,607,850
Alameda County
Water District
Brackish Groundwater
Reclamation Project
NonDAC$2,205,094 Do not
waive
$2,205,094
(No change)
United Water
Conservation
District
Phase 1 Pumping of
Coastal Brackish
Groundwater Wells to
Control Seawater
Intrusion, Oxnard Basin
NonDAC$8,449,062 Do not
waive
$8,449,062
(No change)
City of Pismo
Beach
Central Coast Blue NonDAC$0 Do not
waive
$8,000,000
Totals: $52,910,587 $68,180,687
*The City of El Monte’s project, while serving a DAC, would not be eligible for a match waiver under present circumstances. Water Code, section 79771(c), prohibits funding to be used to pay any share of the costs of remediation recovered or recoverable from responsible parties. Under current circumstances, 54% of the project funds appear to be recoverable from a viable potentially responsible party, the property owner.
2. GWGP staff should notify Round 3 applicants that will be affected by the approval of a complete waiver of match requirements.
3. GWGP staff should notify the City of Pismo Beach about DFA’s funding decision, superseding the funding determination letter dated March 17, 2023.
Joe Karkoski - 5 -
APPROVAL
I, Joe Karkoski, Deputy Director of the State Water Board’s Division of Financial Assistance, approve staff’s recommendations described above.
Approved: _________________________
Joe Karkoski, Deputy Director
Division of Financial Assistance
Attachments (4)
1. Attachment A - Round 3 Funding Recommendation Narrative
2. Attachment B - Pismo Beach - Funding Determination Letter
3. Attachment C - Pismo Beach Central Coast Blue Funding Determination
4. Attachment D - Support for Central Coast Blue and Funding Determination cc: Christopher Stevens
Division of Financial Assistance
Kim Dinh
Division of Financial Assistance
Debbie Cheung
Division of Financial Assistance
Kari Holzgang
Division of Financial Assistance
Anabel Ruiz
Division of Financial Assistance
Joseph Escobar
Division of Financial Assistance
David Maurer
Division of Financial Assistance
Catarina Hinojos
Division of Financial Assistance
Joe Karkoski Digitally signed by Joe Karkoski
Date: 2023.08.29 15:29:00
-07'00'
PCE Plume
Characterization
Project
Implementation
Specification # 2091506
AUGUST 2025 CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | i
Proposal for PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation Dear Nick,
Water Systems Consulting, Inc. (WSC) is pleased to present this updated proposal to the City of San Luis Obispo (City) to continue providing professional engineering and hydrogeologic services for the City’s PCE Plume Characterization Project (Project). WSC is committed to providing quick and direct access to our professionals, proactive and effective coordination, and continuous integration with your staff. Our unique understanding of the Project and our long-standing relationship with City staff issues will help deliver cost-efficient, high-quality work.
By partnering with WSC, your organization will receive:
Unmatched Experience. WSC has supported the City since 2011, and the Project since 2019. We helped develop the initial project concept, secured funding through the Proposition 1 Groundwater Grant Program, and successfully delineated the extent of the plume. We understand the City’s goals, objectives, and the larger Project context, putting us in a unique position to support successful delivery of the Project.
Commitment to Success. We value our relationship with the City and we are committed to the success of the Project. San Luis Obispo is our home and we share the City’s vision of improving water supply reliability and resiliency through the development of local groundwater.
Collaborative and Creative Delivery. We have demonstrated our ability to work collaboratively and creatively since the outset of the Project as needs and priorities have evolved. We will continue to be a reliable and responsive partner as we work together to complete the design and shepherd the Project through construction and successful operation.
We hope this proposal demonstrates our interest and ongoing commitment to the City and its projects. Thank you for your consideration, and we look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
Water Systems Consulting, Inc.
Justin Pickard Jeff Szytel
Project Manager Principal in Charge
August 11, 2025
City of San Luis Obispo
Nick Teague
Water Resources
805.781.7217
[email protected]
WSC San Luis Obispo
805 Aerovista Place
Suite 201
San Luis Obispo, CA
P: 805.457.8833
F: 805.888.2764
Justin Pickard
P: 281.300.8392
E: [email protected]
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo Page 257 of 651 | ii
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Company Project Team ................................................................................................................ 2 Organization Chart ................................................................................................................... 3 Staff Bios ................................................................................................................................... 4 Similar Work Experience............................................................................................................... 9 Proposed Work Approach............................................................................................................13 Schedule.....................................................................................................................................30 Fee..............................................................................................................................................32 Appendix: Combined Scope of Work ..........................................................................................34
Company and Project Team
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 1
Company and Project Team
1
Company and Project Team
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 2
Firm Background
The WSC team will deliver a highvalue project with continuity.
Our proposed team is assembled with the mission
to continue serving as a trusted partner, deliver
tailored solutions, support confident decisions, and
achieve valuable results for the City.
WSC is a full-service civil and environmental
engineering firm that specializes in the planning,
design, construction, and optimization of municipal
drinking water, recycled water, wastewater, and
water supply solutions. WSC was founded in 2007
with a mission to provide high-quality and
responsive engineering services to water agencies
and municipalities.
WSC has provided groundwater infrastructure
planning, design, and construction
management for over 15 years. Our staff includes
engineers, planners, operators, hydrogeologists,
construction managers, and communications
professionals operating out of seven offices, including our headquarters in San Luis Obispo. We are organized to work collaboratively with the City to apply proven approaches and knowledgedriven innovation to deliver truly outstanding results.
The WSC team’s expertise with water resources infrastructure, including production well design, well equipping, well drilling, and hydrogeology, along with our in-depth knowledge of the Project, makes us uniquely suited to continue supporting the City through the design and construction phases. Our subconsultants include El Dorado Engineering and Architecture (EDEA), J Calton Engineering, and Tavangar Consulting Engineers.
About WSC
Type of Corporation:
S-Corporation
Date of Incorporation:
December 4, 2007
Location of Incorporation:
California
Size of Company:
62 employees
Headquarters:
805 Aerovista Place, Suite 201
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
Company and Project Team
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 3
Meet Our Team
A team you can trust to continue delivering value.
Our team for the new groundwater well development program is structured to bring the right expertise to each project component, to work as an integrated team, and to deliver a valueadded project for the City. Our team members have existing working relationships on past and current projects, experience working with the City, and extensive resumes illustrating highquality service.
PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE
Jeff Szytel PE
PROJECT MANAGER
Justin Pickard PE, LEED AP BD+C
QA/QC
Jeff Lawrence PE (Well Equipping)
Joe Kingsbury PG, CHG (Hydrogeology)
WSC STAFF
Well Equipping and
Wellhead Treatment Hydrogeology
Project Engineer Extraction Well Lead
Peter Kvam PE Mike Hoffman PG, CHG
Assistant Engineer Monitoring Well Lead
David Williams EIT, PACP Jessica Chomyn PG
Designer
Mary Harrington
Well Drilling
Oversight
Eric Fregoso GIT
SUBCONSULTANTS
Electrical
Calton Engineering
Structural
Tavangar Consulting
Architectural
EDEA
John Calton PE Omid Tavangar PE Dave Pivetti PE, RA, LEED AP
Company and Project Team
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 4
Key Personnel
Our team members provide insight through their experience WSC team members’ qualifications, education, and experience are presented below.
Justin has over 22 years of
local experience as a project
manager for water resources
projects. He was the Program
Manager for the City of San
Luis Obispo's Water Resource
Recovery Facility Upgrades
and brings experience with
indirect potable reuse and
associated infrastructure from
his work as Program
Manager for the Central
Coast Blue project. He served
in a similar role for
Camarillo's North Pleasant
Valley Desalter, which went
into operation in 2023.
Similarly, for West Basin
Municipal Water District he
served as project manager
for advanced treatment and
infrastructure projects.
Justin Pickard
PROJECT MANAGER
Jeff brings 25 years of
experience in civil and
environmental engineering
specializing in water,
wastewater and recycled
water systems. Jeff's
expertise includes project and
program management,
integrated water resources
planning, capital improvement
planning, and water and
wastewater treatment facility
evaluation, optimization and
design. He has served as a
trusted partner for the City
for over a decade and will
leverage his experience to
help guide WSC’s team so
that the City can reach its
goals.
Jeff Szytel
PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE
Jeff brings 34 years of
engineering experience
centered on a balance of
planning studies and detailed
design, as well as construction
management and operations
optimizations. His experience
includes project/program
management of pipeline and
injection well designs, water
treatment, storage, and
power generation systems;
water resources planning and
recycled water planning;
design, construction, and
operations support; water
system network modeling;
infrastructure rehabilitation;
design-build project
management; and quality
control.
Jeff Lawrence
QA/QC – WELL EQUIPPING
Company and Project Team
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 5
Joe is a professional
geologist and certified
hydrogeologist with more
than 24 years of experience
with groundwater,
geotechnical, and
environmental projects. His
recent project expertise
includes well siting
assessments; preliminary and
final municipal well designs;
construction management and
inspection (CMI) for municipal
supply, monitoring, and
injection wells; and well
rehabilitation prioritization
plans. Joe has a keen ability
to recognize how and when to
initiate leadership and
effective communication to
maintain successful
collaboration among groups
consisting of technical and
non-technical participants
alike on water supply
projects.
Joe Kingsbury
QA/QC - HYDROGEOLOGY
Peter brings 16 years of
engineering experience
centered on groundwater
pump and treatment systems.
He has managed the
operation and maintenance
of several groundwater
treatment facilities and has
designed well equipping and
water treatment processes to
ensure water quality
objectives were met. He
recently assisted in the design
of a groundwater wellhead,
which included an ASR
component for Citrus Heights
Water District's Ella Well. He
was Project Engineer for
Golden State Water
Company's Church Well 25
Equipping project. Peter has
also completed well
installation and equipping
projects for the cities of
Hayward and Pismo Beach,
and Golden State Water
Company.
Peter Kvam
PROJECT ENGINEER
Mike is a hydrogeologist with
26 years of experience in
production and monitoring
well design, installation,
testing and permitting; well
rehabilitation; groundwater
monitoring and sampling;
downhole geophysical
logging; soil sampling;
aquifer testing and analysis;
and groundwater modeling.
He has been involved in over
60 production, injection, and
extraction wells via reverse
circulation drilling method,
including completing 18
DWSAP documents for eleven
different municipalities. He
supported the development
of the Proposition 1
Groundwater Grant Program
conceptual planning proposal
to characterize the PCE plume
impacting many of the City’s
production wells
Mike Hoffman
EXTRACTION WELL LEAD
Company and Project Team
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 6
Jessica has over nine
years of experience
as a consulting
hydrogeologist
focused on
groundwater and
environmental
projects. She has
worked on a variety
of groundwater
contamination and
remediation projects
across a diversity of
land use settings and
sensitive ecological
environments. She has
developed and
executed
groundwater
monitoring programs
which included well
design specifications,
monitoring well
construction and
abandonment, and
groundwater
sampling and
reporting.
Jessica Chomyn
MONITORING WELL
LEAD
Eric is a Geologist-inTraining with
experience in the
geotechnical and
hydrogeological
field. He has
provided
hydrogeology
support on various
groundwater and
water resource
projects. His work
includes data analysis
management and
interpretations,
analyzing geospatial
relationships with ESRI
ArcGIS, and
reporting. He has
also completed soil
and groundwater
investigations,
remediation, Phase II
environmental site
assessments, SVE
systems/in-situ
treatment, methane
gas mitigation
systems, and PFAS
investigations.
Eric Fregoso
WELL DRILLING
OVERSIGHT
David is a staff
engineer with
experience
supporting water,
wastewater, and
reuse projects
throughout California.
David has assisted in
design, planning, and
program managing
for a wide array of
projects, with the most
experience in
groundwater, wells,
pipeline, and potable
reuse projects. He is
experienced
supporting the
proposed project
team in delivering
groundwater solutions
for WSC clients.
David Williams
ASSISTANT
ENGINEER
For the past 32
years, Mary has
worked directly with
civil engineers,
surveyors, architects,
structural, mechanical,
and electrical
engineers to produce
design drawings,
utility maps, and
report graphics.
Specific types of
work included
pipeline plan and
profiles, detailed
mechanical and
piping drawings for
water treatment
plants, wastewater
treatment plants, site
work and cross
sections, earthwork
drawings,
lateral/canal
improvements, pump
stations, road design,
bridges, and figure
graphics for land
zoning and
presentations.
Mary Harrington
DESIGNER
Company and Project Team
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 7
John has over thirty years of
experience in water and
wastewater related projects.
He has performed electrical
designs for water treatment
facilities, pumping plants, storm
drain facilities, ground water
wells, reservoirs, irrigation
canals and fish screens. John
has also provided
instrumentation design for
above-mentioned projects, in
addition to programming
programmable logic controllers
(PLC) and configuring in-plant
supervisory control and data
acquisition (SCADA) systems. He
has been involved on numerous
projects during the construction
phase providing construction
management support ranging
from shop drawings review,
cost estimates, contract
document clarifications, change
order negotiations, construction
inspection, field testing, weekly
coordination meetings, staff
training and system start-up.
John Calton
ELECTRICAL
Omid brings 40 years of
experience as a civil and
structural engineer with
special expertise in the areas
of vertical construction, water,
and wastewater engineering.
His experience includes
design and construction of
wells, water and wastewater
treatment plants, solids
handling facilities, pumping
stations, pipelines, storage
facilities, and a variety of
high-, mid-, and low-rise
structures. His expertise
includes analyzing and
improving structural systems
to achieve optimum
performance and cost
effectiveness.
Omid Tavangar
STRUCTURAL
Dave has more than 40
years’ experience in the
planning and design of water
and wastewater facilities. He
has served as project
principal or manager on
many large projects, including
more than $120 million in
improvements and 30 projects
to the City of Las Vegas’
wastewater treatment facility.
The extensive scope of work
at Las Vegas has included
everything from master
planning of the treatment
system and evaluation and
design of every plant
component from headworks to
digester gas recovery, to a
study of potential reclamation
uses. Dave is a registered
architect and LEED accredited
professional specializing in
sustainable solutions for water
space planning and facility
design, including wells.
Dave Pivetti
ARCHITECTURAL
Similar Work Experience
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 8
Similar Work Experience
2
Similar Work Experience
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 9
Project Experience
Our Experience Provides Insight and Continuity
In addition to their previous work on PCE, the members of WSC’s team have led many projects with similar scopes, giving us a deep understanding of the opportunities and risks for this project. We will use this experience to continue delivering outcomes that achieve your goals while avoiding common challenges.
PCE Plume Delineation and
Groundwater Development
Central Coast Blue
Monitoring Well Program
City of San Luis Obispo City of Pismo Beach
WSC developed a Proposition 1 Groundwater
Grant Application that successfully secured $2
million to fund the development of a
groundwater program that will enable the City to
address contamination and improve the reliability
of its drinking water supply. WSC then
completed a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility
Study Work Plan to summarize historical data
and previous technical studies on the extent of the
PCE groundwater plume, identify data gaps, and
develop a field investigation plan. Field
investigation included soil sampling using pushprobe technology, and collecting water samples and performing ambient/dynamic water quality
profiling in existing wells. WSC prepared a
remedial investigation report and we are
assisting in modeling the underlying groundwater
basin, sampling existing wells to map water
quality, locating sites for future extraction wells,
and preparing a conceptual design for
equipping a well with a treatment system.
WSC partnered with local water agencies on the
Central Coast Blue project and has continued to
support the program through planning and
preliminary design, funding assistance,
groundwater modeling, and overall program
management. As part of the program, WSC
provided site selection, conceptual design, and
final design for well infrastructure and off-site
conveyance. Our scope of work includes planning
and design of five injection well sites, and up to
10 monitoring wells to satisfy regulatory
requirements associated with the indirect potable
reuse project. WSC also led the planning and
conceptual design efforts, prepared the front end
documents, technical plans and specifications, and
provided construction management and field
oversight services for a test injection well and
monitoring wells that were used to better
understand local hydrogeology. Aquifer testing
data from the test injection well and aerial
geophysics data were used to update the
groundwater model to determine injection well
capacity and locations.
Key Staff: Joe Kingsbury (Senior
Hydrogeologist), Eric Fregoso (Staff
Hydrogeologist)
Key Staff: Joe Kingsbury (Lead Hydrogeologist),
Justin Pickard (Program Manager), Jeff Szytel
(Principal in Charge), John Calton (Electrical)
Similar Work Experience
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 10
Alta Mesa GAC
Treatment
Church Well No.
25 Equipping
Sunflower Well
Replacement
Golden State Water
Company
Golden State Water
Company
Golden State Water
Company
WSC prepared design
documents for wellhead
treatment facilities to treat
1,2,3 TCP at the Alta Mesa
well for a combined production
capacity of 600 gpm. WSC
completed the GAC filter
system preliminary engineering
and prepared the final design
and construction bid documents.
WSC worked with GAC system
vendors to fully develop
design parameters including
media type, empty bed
contact time, hydraulic loading
rate, vessel diameter, size and
operational configuration.
System hydraulics were
assessed to verify that the
existing well pumps would be
adequate for use in the GAC
filter system. WSC also
evaluated backwashing
requirements and selected a
bag filter system to provide
pre-filtration for the GAC
system. Construction documents
for the GAC system including
project civil, mechanical and
instrumentation sheets,
specifications, and opinion of
probable construction cost.
WSC provided professional
engineering design services to
develop plans and
specifications for the initial
equipping of a 1,000 gallon
per minute potable
groundwater replacement well.
Improvements included a
disinfection building, relocation
of existing ion exchange
wellhead treatment facilities
from the former well, and
various site improvements
including grading, drainage,
mechanical piping, masonry
screen walls and gate,
electrical and instrumentation
conduits and equipment, and
all-weather access surface
improvements. WSC worked
with the client to ensure the site
layout could accommodate
potential future improvements
including a standby generator,
granular activated carbon
(GAC) contactors, and various
pre-treatment filtration
technologies.
WSC provided design services
to replace a now-defunct
production well as part of the
client’s Columbia Plant for the
San Dimas system. WSC
conducted preliminary
engineering services to provide
clearance and siting of the
newly constructed Sunflower
Well and draft a preliminary
design. In addition, WSC
provided technical plans,
specifications, bid assistance,
and construction management
services. WSC also provided
well equipping design, bid
phase, and construction
support. WSC collaborated
with another firm to provide
field inspection and oversight
of construction and destruction
activities and provide pump
setting recommendations.
Key Staff: Jeff Szytel
(Principal in Charge), Justin
Pickard (Technical Advisor)
Key Staff: Jeff Lawrence
(Project Manager), Peter Kvam
(Project Engineer), John Calton
(Electrical)
Key Staff: Jeff Lawrence
(QA/QC), Joe Kingsbury
(Project Manager), John Calton
(Electrical)
Similar Work Experience
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 11
Seawater Intrusion
Prevention Well
Wells A and B
Rehabilitation
Ella Way Well
Site Design
Soquel Creek Water
District
City of Camarillo Citrus Heights Water
District
Pure Water Soquel is a
groundwater replenishment
and seawater intrusion
prevention project, similar in
scope to Central Coast Blue.
WSC provided engineering
support during the design and
drilling of the wells including
detailed design, bid phase
services, and project
management for the above
ground well equipping and site
development. WSC completed
a bid-ready technical
specification package for the
solicitation of contractor bids
for well construction and site
civil infrastructure. Design
services included piping
design; equipment selection;
grading, drainage, and paving
design; support structure
modifications; and design of
backwash equalization systems
for the three well sites. John
Calton provided electrical
engineering design services.
WSC supported the City of
Camarillo on a wide range of
engineering and
hydrogeological services as
part of the North Pleasant
Valley Desalter Project,
including rehabilitation of two
wells, management of
monitoring wells, and annual
water quality evaluation and
reporting for the Monitoring
and Contingency Plan. The
project includes pumping
4,500-acre feet of brackish
groundwater per year. For
rehabilitation of Wells A and
B, WSC provided design, bid
support, and construction
oversight. The wells are
located within a hospital and
medical complex. It was critical
that proper mitigations be
followed. Due to the stringent
noise mitigation requirements,
proper mitigation measures
were maintained at no
additional cost to the City and
without any complaints from
the hospital and complex.
WSC provided design services
for a groundwater wellhead,
which included an ASR
component enabling the client
to store groundwater during
periods when system capacity
exceeds demand. WSC
worked with the District to
select an appropriate ASR
technology, and designed
wellhead equipment. WSC
developed cost estimates and
project specifications as part
of the design scope. The
project includes well drilling,
surface facilities design, and
construction. The facility is
designed to meet the
operations and functionality
that the District requires, while
also meeting the aesthetic and
low noise levels expected by
the surrounding property
owners. The new well site is
surrounded by residential
properties and must blend in to
preserve the existing character
of the setting.
Key Staff: Jeff Lawrence
(QA/QC), John Calton
(Electrical)
Key Staff: Joe Kingsbury
(Project Manager), Jeff
Lawrence (QA/QC)
Key Staff: Jeff Lawrence
(Project Manager), Peter Kvam
(Project Engineer), Joe
Kingsbury (QA/QC)
Project Understanding and Approach
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 12
Project Understanding and
Approach
3
Project Understanding and Approach
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 13
Project Understanding
Dry cleaning and power generation facilities that once operated in the east and southeast portion of the City are believed to be the sources of a tetrachloroethylene (PCE) plume that has impacted a significant portion of the local groundwater basin and limited the City’s ability to utilize groundwater. In 2020, WSC helped the City secure a $2 million Proposition 1 Groundwater Planning Grant to delineate the extent of PCE plume so a remedial action plan for cleanup of the aquifer could be prepared.
Upon completion of the initial work funded by the planning grant, WSC helped the City secure a $6.6 million Proposition 1 Groundwater Implementation Grant to construct a monitoring well network, drill and equip a new extraction well, equip an existing well, and construct a new granular activated carbon wellhead treatment system. Once constructed, the Project will be able to provide approximately 10% of the City’s water supply, increasing the reliability and resiliency of the City’s water supply portfolio.
Project Approach
WSC’s approach to successful Project delivery is based on continued collaboration and partnership with the City’s team, a renewed focus on project management, and the commitment and expertise of our team members. Project needs and priorities have evolved since the initial planning efforts, and our team has demonstrated its flexibility to adapt to these changing conditions while advancing Project goals and meeting schedule milestones. As we complete design and transition into the bidding and construction phases, coordination between WSC’s project manager and the City’s project manager will be critical to advance Project priorities while working within budget and schedule constraints.
WSC’s team includes key staff members who have been involved in the Project since the initial planning and design efforts and who have an in-depth understanding of the Project and grant requirements. Our team will be supported by one of our most experienced project managers, Justin Pickard, and two of our most experienced QA/QC leads, Jeff Lawrence and Joe Kingsbury. The combined technical and professional capabilities of our staff will help ensure the successful delivery of the Project in accordance with the grant requirements.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 14
Scope of Work
Per the City’s request, the scope of work described below is being proposed as a fixed fee, consistent with the fee included in Section 5. WSC will invoice the City each month with a completion percentage for each task, including work performed to date that has not yet been invoiced. A detailed accounting of labor hours, hourly rates, expenses, and subconsultant costs will not be provided. WSC’s fixed fee proposal is based on the detailed scope of work included below and the combined scope included in Appendix A, including deliverables and assumptions.
Any changes to the scope, schedule, deliverables, or assumptions included in the scope of work will require a contract adjustment or amendment to authorize additional scope and budget.
Task 1 Project Management & Administration
1.1 Project Management
• Consultant responsibilities include preparing and managing subcontracts, facilitating project meetings, stakeholder coordination, and performing quality assurance/quality control reviews on project deliverables.
• Provide technical and administrative services as needed for Project completion; monitor, supervise, and review work performed; and monitor the Project budgeting and scheduling and keep the City informed of progress and potential constraints in accordance with the Grant Agreement.
• Notify the City and State Project Managers at least fifteen (15) working days in advance of upcoming meetings, workshops, and training.
• Develop and update appropriately a detailed Project schedule including key Project milestones and submit to the City and State Project Managers. • Prepare monthly invoices and progress reports for work completed by the WSC team.
1.2 Coordination Meetings
• Plan, organize, and conduct coordination meetings with City staff. Meetings to be held bi-weekly (i.e., twice monthly) during the design phase and monthly during the bid and construction phases.
• Provide draft agenda for City review one (1) day in advance of meeting. • Prepare and distribute meeting notes within two (2) days of each meeting.
Deliverables:
(1) Monthly invoices and progress reports.
(2) Meeting agendas and notes.
(3) Project schedule and schedule updates.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 15
Assumptions:
(1) Remaining Project duration of 20 months (August 2025 through March 2027). (2) Design phase duration of four (4) months (August 2025 through December 2025). (3) Eight (8) bi-weekly (i.e., twice monthly) City coordination meetings during the remainder of the design phase (August 2025 through December 2025), one (1) hour in duration, held via video conference and attended by two (2) WSC staff members. (4) Sixteen (16) monthly City coordination meetings during the bid and construction phases (December 2025 through March 2027), one (1) hour in duration, held via video conference and attended by two (2) WSC staff members. (5) Groundwater Grant quarterly progress reports to be prepared by others beginning Q3 2025.
Task 2 General Compliance Requirements
2.1 Submit GPS Data
• To be performed by City.
2.2 Prepare Monitoring & Reporting Plan (MRP)
• Prepare a Project Assessment and Evaluation Plan (PAEP) which describes the manner in which the Project performance will be assessed, evaluated, and reported.
The PAEP will establish baseline groundwater quality conditions for the Project area and detail the Project’s goals, desired outcomes, and the methods of measuring and reporting Project benefits.
− Develop a draft PAEP for City review.
− Incorporate City comments on the draft PAEP into the initial version of the document transmitted to the TAC.
− Develop a final PAEP incorporating City and TAC review comments on the draft PAEP.
2.3 Monitor Performance
• Collect groundwater samples from monitoring wells to establish baseline conditions in accordance with the approved MRP.
• Train City staff on groundwater collection sampling protocols to facilitate subsequent quarterly groundwater sample collection by others.
2.4 Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP)
• Task completed.
2.5 Upload Groundwater Analytical Data
• Prepare and upload groundwater analytical data collected in accordance with the MRP to the State Water Board’s GeoTracker/GAMA system in Electronic Deliverable
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 16
Format (EDF). Groundwater samples include (as applicable): monitoring well samples, borehole samples, piezometer samples, and samples from drinking water wells. Locational information for these sampling points will be submitted using the GEO XY file.
− Upload data that was utilized in the PAEP to establish baseline groundwater quality conditions for the Project area.
2.6 Final Reports
• Prepare a draft Final Project Report in a format provided by the State Project Manager describing the objective of the project; the project scope, schedule, and cost; photo documentation; discussion of the project’s likelihood of addressing the water quality problem; an evaluation of the relevant water quality data; and summary of lessons learned as required by the grant agreement.
• Incorporate City comments on the draft Final Project Report into the initial version of the document transmitted to the State Project Manager.
• Develop a Final Project Report incorporating City and State Project Manager review comments on the draft report.
• Prepare a draft Final Project Summary summarizing the information contained in the Final Project Report as required by the grant agreement. • Develop a final version of the Final Project Summary incorporating City and State Project Manager review comments on the draft document.
Deliverables:
(1) Draft and final MRP.
(2) Draft and final QAPP.
(3) Draft and final PAEP.
(4) Draft and Final Project Report.
(5) Draft and Final Project Summary.
Assumptions:
(1) Compilation and submittal of GPS data to the State Project Manager to be performed by City staff (Task 2.1).
(2) Groundwater sampling and analysis limited to one (1) sampling event to establish baseline conditions. Subsequent sampling to be performed by City staff. (3) City to contract with testing laboratory for groundwater analysis. City to pay for shipping and laboratory testing.
(4) Groundwater analytical data from initial sampling event to be uploaded to Geotracker database. Analytical data from subsequent sampling events to be uploaded by City staff.
(5) One revision of draft PAEP, Final Project Report, and Final Project Summary documents to address City review comments prior to transmittal to the State Project Manager. Multiple revisions not included.
(6) Preparation of Operational Reports not included.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 17
(7) Preparation of Groundwater Grant quarterly progress reports not included. (8) Site visits with City staff and State Project Manager not included. (9) Photo monitoring before, during, and after project implementation not included.
Task 3 Permitting Support
3.1 Division of Drinking Water (DDW) Drinking Water Supply Permit • Attend two (2) meetings with DDW staff to discuss amendments to the City’s Drinking Water Supply Permit.
• Review and provide comments on DDW’s proposed changes to City’s Drinking Water Supply Permit.
• Complete remaining Drinking Water Source Assessment and Protection (DWSAP) forms and finalize document as part of DDW Drinking Water Supply Permit amendment:
− Cover Page
− Checklist
− Assessment Summary
− Source Location Form
3.2 PG&E Coordination
• Inform PG&E of proposed changes to electrical loads at existing electrical distribution equipment.
• Compile and transmit electrical single-line diagrams and electrical load summaries to PG&E.
Deliverables:
(1) Comments on proposed changes to City’s Drinking Water Supply Permit. (2) Completed DWSAP forms.
Assumptions:
(1) Two (2) DDW coordination meetings, one (1) hour in duration, held via video conference, and attended by one (1) WSC staff member.
(2) Due to the uncertainty associated with the level of effort required for Task 3.1, 60 staff hours have been assumed for review of proposed changes to the City’s Drinking Water Supply Permit and completion of the DWSAP forms. (3) Due to the uncertainty associated with the level of effort required for Task 3.2, four (4) staff hours have been assumed.
(4) Well drilling permit applications not included.
(5) Preparation of Caltrans encroachment permit not included. (6) Preparation of City encroachment permits, which may be required for select monitoring wells, not included.
(7) Permit fees not included.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 18
(8) Formal service application or service modification application to PG&E not included. (9) City building permit not included.
Task 4 Technical Advisory Committee
4.1 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
• Conduct additional TAC meetings in accordance with the project schedule and submit agendas, meeting notes, and sign-in sheets for each meeting to the State Project Manager.
• Provide draft agenda for TAC review three (3) working days in advance of meeting. • Prepare and distribute meeting notes within two (2) working days of meeting.
Deliverables:
(1) TAC meeting agendas and notes.
Assumptions:
(1) Eight (8) TAC meetings (Q2 2025 through Q2 2027), one (1) hour in duration, held via video conference, and attended by two (2) WSC staff members.
Task 5 Planning, Design & Engineering
5.1 Groundwater Model
• Task complete.
5.2 Design Monitoring Wells
• Submit the 100% plans, specifications, cost opinion, to the City for review and comment followed by submission to the TAC for comment and the State Project Manager for approval.
• Complete the bid documents in accordance with the approved design plans. Submit the bid documents to the City for review and comment followed by submission to the TAC for comment and the State Project Manager for approval. • WSC assumes monitoring wells will be located within public right-of-way or property owned by the City. Monitoring wells will be installed with flush-mounted surface completions to avoid causing a public hazard/nuisance.
5.3 Extraction Well & Wellhead Treatment Design
• Prepare 100% plans, specifications, and cost opinion including responses to TAC comments on the 60% plans.
• Submit the 100% plans, specifications, and cost opinion to the City for review and comment followed by submission to the TAC for comment and the State Project Manager for approval.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 19
• Complete the bid documents in accordance with the approved design plans. Submit the bid documents to the City for review and comment followed by submission to the TAC for comment and the State Project Manager for approval.
5.4 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Development • Prepare a draft Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for project compliance with the Statewide Construction General Permit for Storm Water. • Prepare a final SWPPP incorporating the City’s review comments on the draft document.
• SWPPP to include:
− SWPPP requirements
− Project information
− Potential pollutants
− Best management practices (BMPs)
− Maintenance, inspection, and repair
− Training materials
− Construction site monitoring program
− Personnel and contractor responsibilities
− Site maps
− Erosion and sediment control plans
− Dewatering and disposal of groundwater
• Prepare a risk assessment for the SWPPP based on site conditions and information provided by the City related to project location, soils, and receiving waters. • Update the risk assessment based on the actual start and end dates of construction. • Prepare and compile Permit Registration Documents (PRDs) including the Notice of Intent (NOI). Post PRDs to the State Water Resources Control Board online database – the Storm Water Multi-Application Report Tracking System (SMARTS) • Participate in up to two (2), 1-hour meetings with City staff to discuss the SWPPP.
Deliverables:
(1) Monitoring well technical specifications, cost estimates, and bidding documents. (2) Draft and Final Monitoring Well Siting Technical Memorandum. (3) Treatment well technical specifications, cost estimates, and bidding documents. (4) Response to comments.
(5) Draft and final SWPPP.
(6) SWPPP meeting agendas and notes.
Assumptions:
(1) Front-end documents to be provided by City.
(2) City review comments to be provided in Microsoft Excel format. (3) Design review workshop to be held via video conference with a two-hour duration and attended by two (2) WSC staff members.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 20
(4) Preliminary (30%) cost opinions consistent with Class 4 as defined by AACE International. Intermediate cost opinions (60%) consistent with Class 3 as defined by AACE International. Final cost opinions (100% and bid set) consistent with Class 2 as defined by AACE International.
(5) A building permit from the City Community Development Department will not be required and a formal plan check will not be performed. (6) An informal “counter check” will be performed by Community Development Department staff. A single counter check will be performed, support for multiple Community Development or Public Works Department plan checks is not included. (7) Design of fire protection systems and preparation of fire protection system performance specifications are not included.
(8) SWPPP to be developed based on new Construction General Permit requirements. (9) SWPPP to be prepared using a modified California Storm Water Quality Association template.
(10) Project risk rating of 2.
(11) Permit fees to be paid by City.
(12) City is Legally Responsible Party (LRP).
(13) Implementation and Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP) responsibilities by others. (14) SWPPP will not include extraction and monitoring well projects.
Task 6 Construction/Implementation Services
6.1 Bid Phase Services
• Attend pre-bid meeting and site walk for monitoring well and well equipping projects. • Prepare responses to requests for information and requests for clarification received from bidders during the bid advertisement period.
• Compile responses to bidder questions in formal addenda. • Incorporate changes to plans and technical specifications issued during the bid advertisement period into a conformed set of construction documents.
6.2 Construction Meetings
• Participate in weekly construction meetings for the Monitoring Well (Packet 1), Bob Jones Trail Well (Packet 2), and Bob Jones Trail Well and Highway 101 Well Equipping (Packet 3) Projects.
6.3 Final Well Design
• Plan, organize, and conduct final well design meetings for the Bob Jones Trail Well and monitoring wells within one (1) day following pilot hole drilling and geophysical logging.
• Provide meeting notes within two (2) days of each meeting. • Prepare final well designs for the Bob Jones Trail Well and monitoring wells based on the results of the collected lithology and geophysical logs.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 21
• Final well designs will include recommended depth intervals for reamed borehole, diameter depths, well casing and screen, ancillary tubing, and annular materials, and filter pack gradations and slot sizes for well screens. • Prepare and submit draft well design memoranda (Bob Jones Trail Well and monitoring wells) to the City for review and approval.
• Prepare final well design memoranda incorporating City review comments. • Analyze data from step drawdown and constant rate pumping tests and prepare a draft memorandum with recommended operational parameters, including design pumping rate, short- and long-term drawdown characteristics, well efficiency, and recommended pump intake depth (Bob Jones Trail Well).
• Prepare a final pump setting and flow rate memorandum incorporating City review comments (Bob Jones Trail Well).
6.4 Submittal Review
• Review submittals, shop drawings, and samples for conformance with the contract documents and design intent.
• Prepare and transmit written submittal review comments. • Review substitution requests and provide written review comments.
6.5 Request for Information (RFI) Responses
• Review and respond to RFIs and requests for clarification from the contractor.
6.6 Contract Document Clarifications (CDCs)
• Prepare CDCs when necessary to clarify or refine information included in the contract documents.
• Coordinate with the construction manager to issue CDCs to the contractor under cover of a potential change order (PCO) or request for quote (RFQ) for pricing.
6.7 Start-Up Support
• Assist the contractor in the start-up of the equipment and systems installed as part of the project.
• Participate in up to four (4) commissioning and start-up meetings chaired by the City or construction manager.
• Review commissioning and start-up documentation prepared by the contractor for conformance with the contract documents.
• Provide up to 40 hours of on-site support for oversight of contractor’s performance and demonstration testing activities.
6.8 Operations Manual
• Prepare draft operations manual for wells and granular activated carbon system. • Compile approved O&M manuals and include in operations manual as reference documents.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 22
• Prepare final operations manual incorporating City review comments.
6.9 Punch List
• Participate in a site walk with the City and the construction manager to develop a project punch list.
• Tabulate punch list items in Microsoft Excel format and transmit to City and construction manager.
• Participate in a final site walk to confirm resolution of punch list items.
6.10 Record Drawings
• Prepare record drawings based on as-built drawings prepared by the contractor. • Provide electronic copies of record drawings in PDF and AutoCAD (most recent version).
6.11 Borehole Drilling, Logging and Reaming
• Provide full-time field oversight during conductor casing borehole drilling and installation of the conductor casing and cement sanitary seal for Bob Jones Trail Well. • Provide full-time field oversight during pilot borehole (Bob Jones Trail Well) and monitor well borehole drilling operations.
• Collect formation samples at 10-foot intervals (or more frequently if lithology changes) and visually log samples for material type and production potential using the United Soil Classification System.
• Provide full-time oversight during geophysical logging of the completed pilot borehole (Bob Jones Trail Well).
• Provide full-time oversight during the caliper and deviation surveys (Bob Jones Trail Well).
• Provide part-time field oversight during reaming of the pilot borehole to the final diameters and depths established in the final well design memorandum (Task 6.3).
6.12 Well Construction
• Provide full-time oversight during well casing, well screen, ancillary tubing (Bob Jones Trail Well), gravel pack, and annular seal installation. • Inspect gravel pack, well casing, and well screen material to confirm compliance with the contract documents and approved submittals.
6.13 Well Development
• Provide full-time field oversight during mechanical well development, including swabbing and bailing, dispersant addition, and airlifting. • Monitor and record parameters including pH, temperature, conductivity, turbidity, flow rate, time spent developing each screen section, frequency of swabbing, type and quantity of added dispersants, and parameters of water routed for disposal. • Provide full-time oversight during pumping development (Bob Jones Trail Well).
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 23
• Monitor and record discharge parameters, surging frequency, pumping rate and water levels, and quality of water routed to WRRF for disposal (Bob Jones Trail Well). • Monitor tests performed by the contractor for sand content and specific capacity to determine the advancement of the development process and to verify that the well is developed to the point at which sand production is minimized and specific capacity is maximized.
6.14 Down Well Survey and Testing
• Provide full-time oversight during step drawdown and constant rate pumping tests.
Measure and record depth to water at regular intervals, confirm pumping rates, and measure and record water parameters at the end of each test (Bob Jones Trail Well). • Provide full-time oversight during sample collection and during the constant rate, and water level recovery testing (Bob Jones Trail Well). Measure and record depth to water at regular intervals, record pumping rates, and assist with collection of final groundwater sample (Bob Jones Trail Well).
• Provide full-time oversight during down well video survey to document postconstruction condition of the well structure following removal of the test pump and bailing of the well casing (Bob Jones Trail Well).
• Provide full-time oversight during dummy test, gyroscopic deviation test, and initial well disinfection in accordance with AWWA A100/C-654 standards (Bob Jones Trail Well).
Deliverables:
(1) Addenda.
(2) Conformed construction documents.
(3) Well design meeting notes.
(4) Draft and final well design memoranda.
(5) Draft and final well pump setting and discharge rate memorandum (Bob Jones Trail Well).
(6) Submittal review comments.
(7) RFI responses.
(8) CDCs.
(9) Draft and final operations manual (PDF).
(10) Punch list.
(11) Aquifer testing data files (manual and automated water level measurements for background, step drawdown, constant rate, and water level recovery) in electronic format (Excel).
(12) Record drawings (AutoCAD and PDF).
(13) Well drilling oversight daily field reports.
Assumptions:
(1) Construction phase duration of 12 months.
(2) Two pre-bid meetings (monitoring wells and Bob Jones Trail Well equipping).
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 24
(3) City to plan, organize, and conduct pre-bid meetings. (4) Due to the uncertainty regarding the number of bidder questions received and the number of addenda required, the budget for addenda preparation is based on an assumed level of effort of 44 hours.
(5) Due to the uncertainty regarding the number of addenda issued and required updates to the bid documents, the budget for preparation of conformed documents is based on an assumed level of effort of 20 hours.
(6) Bid review and tabulation to be performed by City.
(7) Support for bid protest resolution not included.
(8) Final well design memoranda to be transmitted to contractor by City. (9) Construction meetings to be planned, organized, and conducted by others. (10) Participation in construction meetings as follows:
52 well equipping meetings
12 monitoring well meetings
12 extraction well meetings
(11) Construction meetings to be one (1) hour in duration, held via video conference, and attended by one (1) WSC staff member.
(12) Review of up to 90 submittals; two (2) staff hours per submittal on average. (13) Review of up to 40 RFIs; three (3) staff hours per RFI on average. (14) Preparation of two (2) CDCs.
(15) Start-up meetings to be held via video conference with a two-hour duration and attended by two (2) WSC staff members.
(16) Commissioning and start-up plan to be prepared by the contractor. (17) Operations manual will not include detailed standard operating procedures.
Operations manual will provide a general overview and description of the wells and treatment system.
(18) Record drawings will be prepared based on as-builts/redlines prepared by others.
WSC will not independently verify the accuracy of as-builts/redlines. (19) Record drawings will not be signed and sealed.
(20) Hard copies of record drawings will not be provided. (21) Construction management and inspection services not included. (22) Well construction field oversight subject to prevailing wage requirements. (23) Engineering and hydrogeological services during well construction (e.g., submittal reviews, meeting participation, RFI responses) are included in Task 6. (24) Construction staking or marking for the final well location will be provided by the City.
(25) The drilling contractor will provide representative formation samples at 10-foot intervals for WSC’s field hydrogeologists to log and classify using the Unified Soils Classification System.
(26) The drilling contractor will provide a qualified laboratory to perform sieve analysis (grain size distribution) on formation samples selected by WSC and for gravel pack materials that are delivered to the well site, prior to constructing the well.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 25
(27) The drilling contractor will provide a state-certified laboratory for the analysis of water quality samples collected during pumping tests.
(28) The drilling contractor will record all measurements obtained from their work, such as water levels, pumping rates, pipe tallies, etc. and will be made available in the field to WSC.
(29) City to provide inspection and oversight for mobilization, utility clearance, traffic control, erection of sound walls, site restoration, demobilization, and all other work not specifically included in WSC’s scope of work.
(30) Engineering and hydrogeological support for construction of the optional Monitoring Well 6 not included (see Optional Task 1).
(31) Level of effort for well construction field oversight based on typical durations as detailed below and as reflected in the fee estimate. Well construction field oversight in excess of the hours estimated below will require authorization of additional budget.
Assumptions: Assumptions: Task No. Description
Field Oversight Hours
BJT Well Monitoring
Wells
6.11 Borehole Drilling, Logging & Reaming 76 130
6.12 Well Construction 36 60
6.13 Well Development 100 60
6.14 Down Well Survey and Testing 39 0
Task 7 Public Outreach
7.1 Public Outreach
• Task complete.
Optional Task 1 Monitoring Well 6
O1.1 Monitoring Well 6 Design
Plan, organize, and conduct a final well design meeting for Monitoring Well 6 within one (1) day following pilot hole drilling and geophysical logging. Provide meeting notes within two (2) days of the meeting. Prepare final well design for Monitoring Well 6 based on the results of the collected lithology and geophysical logs.
Final well design will include recommended depth intervals for reamed borehole, diameter depths, well casing and screen, ancillary tubing, and annular materials. Prepare and submit draft well design memorandum to the City for review and approval.
Prepare final well design memorandum incorporating City review comments.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 26
O1.2 Monitoring Well 6 Completion Report
Prepare a well completion report documenting the as-built well conditions.
O1.3 Monitoring Well 6 Borehole Drilling, Logging and Reaming Provide full-time field oversight during pilot borehole drilling operations. Collect formation samples at 10-foot intervals (or more frequently if lithology changes) and visually log samples for material type and production potential using the United Soil Classification System.
Provide part-time field oversight during reaming of the pilot borehole to the final diameters and depths established in the final well design memorandum (Task O1.1).
O1.4 Monitoring Well 6 Construction
Provide full-time oversight during well casing, well screen, gravel pack, and annular seal installation.
Inspect gravel pack, well casing, and well screen material to confirm compliance with the contract documents and approved submittals.
O1.5 Monitoring Well 6 Development
Provide full-time field oversight during well development, including swabbing, dispersant addition, and airlifting.
Monitor and record parameters including pH, temperature, conductivity, turbidity, flow rate, time spent developing each screen section, frequency of swabbing, type and quantity of added dispersants, and quality of water routed for disposal. Monitor tests performed by the contractor for sand content and specific capacity to determine the advancement of the development process and to verify that the well is developed to the point at which sand production is minimized and specific capacity is maximized.
Deliverables:
(1) Draft and final well design memorandum.
(2) Well design meeting agenda and notes.
(3) Draft and final well completion report.
Assumptions:
(1) Level of effort for well construction field oversight based on typical durations as detailed below and as reflected in the fee estimate. Well construction field oversight in excess of the hours estimated below will require authorization of additional budget.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 27
Task No. Description Staff Hours
O1.3 Borehole Drilling, Logging & Reaming 10
O1.4 Well Construction 8
O1.5 Well Development 8
(2) City to provide inspection and oversight for mobilization, utility clearance, traffic control, erection of sound walls, site restoration, demobilization, and all other work not specifically included in WSC’s scope of work.
Optional Task 2 Well Construction Summary Report
O2.1 Well Construction Summary Report
Prepare draft well construction summary reports including the following:
− Chronology of well construction activities.
− Copy of Water Well Construction permit approved by County Department of Environmental Health Services and other permits required for the drilling/construction.
− A photographic log of key well construction activities/phases. − Copies of reviewed submittals and responses to contractor RFIs. − Lithologic log based on drill cuttings collected from the conductor and pilot boreholes.
− Borehole geophysical logs.
− Results of mechanical grading analyses for selected drill cuttings and gravel pack material.
− Copies of drilling contractor field records.
− Copies of well construction, development, and aquifer testing field forms. − Copies of plumbness and alignment test logs, post-construction video log, and well disinfection log.
− Analyses and results of post-construction pumping tests. • Prepare final well construction summary reports incorporating City review comments.
Deliverables:
(1) Draft and final well construction summary reports.
Optional Task 3 As-Needed Support
O3.1 As-Needed Well Drilling Support
Provide as-needed services to support management, administration, and oversight of well drilling contractors by City staff.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 28
O3.2 Unscheduled Meetings Allowance
Attend additional meetings not included in the base scope of work as requested by the City to facilitate implementation of the program.
O3.3 As-Needed Technical Support
Provided as-needed technical support for Grant administration, regulatory agency coordination, and other tasks when requested by the City.
Schedule
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 29
Schedule
4
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
1 Design Phase 255 days Wed 1/1/25 Wed 12/31/25
2 Monitoring Wells (Packet 1) 200 days Wed 1/1/25 Fri 10/10/253 100% Design Development 75 days Wed 1/1/25 Tue 4/15/254 City & TAC Review 21 wks Wed 4/16/25 Fri 9/12/25 35 Bid Package Development 4 wks Mon 9/15/25 Fri 10/10/25 4 6 Well Equipping (Packet 3) 255 days Wed 1/1/25 Wed 12/31/257 100% Design Development 11 mons Wed 1/1/25 Fri 11/7/258 City & TAC Review 4 wks Mon 11/10/25 Tue 12/9/25 7 9 Bid Package Development 3 wks Wed 12/10/25 Wed 12/31/25 8 10 Bid Phase 249 days Thu 3/27/25 Mon 3/23/2611 Monitoring Wells (Packet 1) 50 days Fri 10/17/25 Wed 12/31/2512 Issue Bid Advertisement 0 days Fri 10/17/25 Fri 10/17/25 5FS+5 days13 Bid Advertisement Period 6 wks Mon 10/20/25 Tue 12/2/25 1214 Contract Award & Execution 1 mon Wed 12/3/25 Wed 12/31/25 1315 Extraction Well (Packet 2) 61 days Thu 3/27/25 Fri 6/20/2516 Issue Bid Advertisement 0 days Thu 3/27/25 Thu 3/27/2517 Bid Advertisement Period 21 days Thu 3/27/25 Thu 4/24/25 1618 Contract Award & Execution 2 mons Fri 4/25/25 Fri 6/20/25 1719 Well Equipping (Packet 3) 50 days Thu 1/8/26 Mon 3/23/2620 Issue Bid Advertisement 0 days Thu 1/8/26 Thu 1/8/26 9FS+5 days21 Bid Advertisement Period 6 wks Fri 1/9/26 Mon 2/23/26 2022 Contract Award & Execution 1 mon Tue 2/24/26 Mon 3/23/26 2123 Construction Phase 428 days Tue 7/8/25 Mon 3/15/2724 Monitoring Wells (Packet 1) 3 mons Fri 1/16/26 Mon 4/13/26 14FS+10 days25 Extraction Well (Packet 2) 3 mons Tue 7/8/25 Tue 9/30/25 18FS+10 days26 Well Equipping (Packet 3) 12 mons Tue 4/7/26 Mon 3/15/27 22FS+10 days 10/17
3/27
1/8
Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Qtr 1, 2025 Qtr 2, 2025 Qtr 3, 2025 Qtr 4, 2025 Qtr 1, 2026 Qtr 2, 2026 Qtr 3, 2026 Qtr 4, 2026 Qtr 1, 2027 Qtr 2, 2027 Task Milestone Summary Project Summary Manual Summary Rollup
Please note the schedule above does not reflect all tasks completed to date.The intent of the schedule is to illustrate the estimated remaining duration of the design,bid, and construction phases of the Project.
Fee
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 31
Fee
5
Base Fee
Task No. Task Description Current Contract
Work Authorization
Request 5
Total Fee
1 Project Management & Administration $ 97,200 $ 181,430 $ 278,630
1.1 Project Management $ 97,200 $ 150,320 $ 247,520
1.2 Coordination Meetings $ - $ 31,110 $ 31,110
2 General Compliance Requirements $ 89,505 $ (295) $ 89,210
2.1 Submit GPS Data $ 1,060 $ (1,060) $ -
2.2 Prepare MRP $ 43,945 $ 8,584 $ 52,529
2.3 Monitor Performance $ 37,550 $ (20,650) $ 16,900
2.4 Prepare Quality Assurance Project Plan $ 4,500 $ 31 $ 4,531
2.5 Upload GW Analytical Data $ 2,450 $ 1,050 $ 3,500
2.6 Project Reports $ - $ 11,750 $ 11,750
3 Permitting Support $ - $ 18,090 $ 18,090
3.1 Drinking Water Supply Permit $ - $ 14,320 $ 14,320
3.2 PG&E Coordination $ - $ 3,770 $ 3,770
4 Technical Advisory Committee $ 25,950 $ 4,193 $ 30,143
4.1 Technical Advisory Committee $ 25,950 $ 4,193 $ 30,143 5 Planning/Design/Engineering $ 708,082 $ 261,779 $ 969,861
5.1 Groundwater Model $ 150,040 $ (4,388) $ 145,652
5.2 Design Monitoring Wells $ 72,040 $ 70,599 $ 142,639
5.3 Design Extraction and Treatment Wells $ 475,322 $ 195,568 $ 670,890
5.4 SWPPP Development $ 10,680 $ - $ 10,680
6 Construction/Implementation Services $ - $ 385,848 $ 385,848
6.1 Bid Phase Services $ - $ 19,600 $ 19,600
6.2 Construction Meetings $ - $ 29,260 $ 29,260
6.3 Final Well Design $ - $ 9,875 $ 9,875
6.4 Submittal Review $ - $ 89,020 $ 89,020
6.5 RFI/RFC Responses $ - $ 45,448 $ 45,448
6.6 Contract Document Clarifications $ - $ 6,480 $ 6,480
6.7 Start-Up Support $ - $ 27,685 $ 27,685
6.8 O&M Manual $ - $ 13,360 $ 13,360
6.9 Punch List $ - $ 6,605 $ 6,605
6.10 Record Drawings $ - $ 15,293 $ 15,293
6.11 Borehole Drilling, Logging & Reaming $ - $ 45,053 $ 45,053
6.12 Well Construction $ - $ 26,598 $ 26,598
6.13 Well Development $ - $ 38,758 $ 38,758
6.14 Down Well Survey & Testing $ - $ 12,813 $ 12,813
7 Outreach $ 21,740 $ 623 $ 22,363
7.1 Outreach $ 21,740 $ 623 $ 22,363
$ 942,477 $ 851,668 $ 1,794,145
Optional Tasks
Task No. Task Description Current Contract
Work Authorization
Request 5
Total Fee
OT1 Monitoring Well 6 $ - $ 9,375 $ 9,375
OT 1.1 Well 6 Design $ - $ 1,860 $ 1,860
OT 1.2 Well 6 Completion Report $ - $ 2,575 $ 2,575
OT 1.3 Well 6 Borehole Drilling, Logging & Reaming $ - $ 1,900 $ 1,900 OT 1.4 Well 6 Construction $ - $ 1,520 $ 1,520
OT 1.5 Well 6 Development $ - $ 1,520 $ 1,520
OT2 Well Construction Summary Report $ - $ 27,870 $ 27,870 OT2.1 Well Construction Summary Report $ - $ 27,870 $ 27,870 OT3 As-Needed Support $ - $ 54,370 $ 54,370
OT 3.1 As-Needed Well Drilling Support $ - $ 8,470 $ 8,470 OT 3.2 Unscheduled Meetings Allowance $ - $ 15,300 $ 15,300 OT 3.3 As-Needed Technical Support $ - $ 30,600 $ 30,600 $ - $ 91,615 $ 91,615
TOTAL
TOTAL
PCE Plume Charcterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo Page 290 of 651
Combined Scope of Work
PCE Plume Characterization Project Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 33
Combined Scope of Work
A
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 34
Scope of Work
The scope of work described below is intended to consolidate and reconcile the Project scope of work by presenting the original scope of work included with Work Authorization Request No. 2, documenting work performed to date not included in the original scope of work or authorized by change order, and presenting new scope for remaining design, bid, and construction phase services in accordance with the City’s RFP and as clarified with City staff.
The original Project scope of work is presented in plain text. Clarifications and additions to the original scope of work (e.g., bid and construction phase services), are presented with underlined text. Work performed to date, but not included in the original scope of work, is presented with bold text. Scope deleted or removed from the original scope of work is shown with strikethough text.
Task 1 Project Management & Administration
1.1 Project Management
• Consultant responsibilities include preparing and managing subcontracts, facilitating project meetings, stakeholder coordination, assisting the City with Grant Agreement Progress Reports (through Q2 2025), and performing quality assurance/quality control reviews on project deliverables.
• Provide technical and administrative services as needed for Project completion; monitor, supervise, and review work performed; and monitor the Project budgeting and scheduling and keep the City informed of progress and potential constraints in accordance with the Grant Agreement.
• Notify the City and State Project Managers at least fifteen (15) working days in advance of upcoming meetings, workshops, and training.
• Develop and update appropriately a detailed Project schedule including key Project milestones and submit to the City and State Project Managers. • Conduct periodic and final site visits with the City and State Project Managers and other staff designated by the State Division of Financial Assistance (DFA). • Conduct pre-, during, and post-implementation photo monitoring at the Project site and submit to the City and State Project Managers.
• Prepare monthly invoices and progress reports for work completed by the WSC team.
1.2 Coordination Meetings
• Plan, organize, and conduct coordination meetings with City staff. Meetings to be held bi-weekly (i.e., twice monthly) during the design phase and monthly during the bid and construction phases.
• Provide draft agenda for City review one (1) day in advance of meeting. • Prepare and distribute meeting notes within two (2) days of each meeting.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 35
Deliverables:
(1) Monthly invoices and progress reports.
(2) Meeting agendas and notes.
(3) Project schedule and schedule updates.
Assumptions:
(1) Remaining Project duration of 20 months (August 2025 through March 2027). (2) Design phase duration of four (4) months (August 2025 through December 2025). (3) Eight (8) bi-weekly (i.e., twice monthly) City coordination meetings during the remainder of the design phase (August 2025 through December 2025), one (1) hour in duration, held via video conference and attended by two (2) WSC staff members. (4) Sixteen (16) monthly City coordination meetings during the bid and construction phases (December 2025 through March 2027), one (1) hour in duration, held via video conference and attended by two (2) WSC staff members. (5) Groundwater Grant quarterly progress reports to be prepared by others beginning Q3 2025.
Task 2 General Compliance Requirements
2.1 Submit GPS Data
• Submit Global Positioning System (GPS) information and survey data for project site(s) and monitoring location(s) for this Project to the State Project Manager.
2.2 Prepare Monitoring & Reporting Plan (MRP)
• Prepare a Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MRP) that addresses pre-construction and post-construction performance monitoring for the useful life of the Project. Submit the MRP to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) for comment and the State Project Manager for approval. The MRP will include the following:
− A Monitoring Plan (MP) that includes the following sections:
• Purpose: Describe the methods used to measure, evaluate, and document performance of the remediation and treatment system based on the effectiveness of the remedy meeting the Project purpose, objectives, and metrics developed in the Project Assessment and Evaluation Plan (PAEP).
Describe the relation of the proposed monitoring activities to other monitoring activities in the Project area.
• Project Area: Provide a map and narrative description of the anticipated area of plume capture, location of the Project, and location of monitoring wells and production wells that will be sampled to achieve the purpose of the MP. • Sampling Plan: Describe the methodology and analytical methods used, selection of monitoring locations, the frequency of monitoring, and the process that will be used to make necessary changes to achieve the purpose of the MP.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 36
• Field Procedures: Provide a description of field procedures including sample collection methods, equipment decontamination, sample identification and handling, and documentation procedures.
• A PAEP which describes the manner in which the Project performance will be assessed, evaluated, and reported. The PAEP will establish baseline groundwater quality conditions for the Project area and detail the Project’s goals, desired outcomes, and the methods of measuring and reporting Project benefits. − Develop a draft PAEP for City review.
− Incorporate City comments on the draft PAEP into the initial version of the document transmitted to the TAC.
− Develop a final PAEP incorporating City and TAC review comments on the draft PAEP.
2.3 Monitor Performance
• Monitor Project effectiveness in accordance with the approved MRP. Conduct the post-construction monitoring in accordance with the approved MRP and include the results during the first year of post-construction monitoring in the associated quarterly progress report. A summary of all Project effectiveness monitoring and data analysis shall be included in the Final Project Report.
• Collect groundwater samples from monitoring wells to establish baseline conditions in accordance with the approved MRP.
• Train City staff on groundwater collection sampling protocols to facilitate subsequent quarterly groundwater sample collection by others.
2.4 Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP)
• Prepare a QAPP in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPAs) QAPP guidance documents (EPA QA/G-5 and EPA QA/R-5).
Submit the QAPP to the State Project Manager for approval.
2.5 Upload Groundwater Analytical Data
• Prepare and upload all groundwater analytical data collected in accordance with the MRP to the State Water Board’s GeoTracker/GAMA system in Electronic Deliverable Format (EDF). Groundwater samples include (as applicable): monitoring well samples, borehole samples, piezometer samples, and samples from drinking water wells. Locational information for these sampling points will be submitted using the GEO XY file.
− Upload data that was utilized in the PAEP to establish baseline groundwater quality conditions for the Project area.
− Upload other data related to the design and development of the Project that is not presently available on GeoTracker/GAMA. This may include reports, figures, maps and geographic information system (GIS) data. When applicable, submit an annotated list of reviewed data and reports to the State Project Manager.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 37
2.6 Final Reports
• Prepare a draft Final Project Report in a format provided by the State Project Manager describing the objective of the project; the project scope, schedule, and cost; photo documentation; discussion of the project’s likelihood of addressing the water quality problem; an evaluation of the relevant water quality data; and summary of lessons learned as required by the grant agreement.
• Incorporate City comments on the draft Final Project Report into the initial version of the document transmitted to the State Project Manager.
• Develop a Final Project Report incorporating City and State Project Manager review comments on the draft report.
• Prepare a draft Final Project Summary summarizing the information contained in the Final Project Report as required by the grant agreement. • Develop a final version of the Final Project Summary incorporating City and State Project Manager review comments on the draft document.
Deliverables:
(1) Draft and final MRP.
(2) Draft and final QAPP.
(3) Draft and final PAEP.
(4) Draft and Final Project Report.
(5) Draft and Final Project Summary.
Assumptions:
(1) Compilation and submittal of GPS data to the State Project Manager to be performed by City staff (Task 2.1).
(2) Groundwater sampling and analysis limited to one (1) sampling event to establish baseline conditions. Subsequent sampling to be performed by City staff. (3) City to contract with testing laboratory for groundwater analysis. City to pay for shipping and laboratory testing.
(4) Groundwater analytical data from initial sampling event to be uploaded to Geotracker database. Analytical data from subsequent sampling events to be uploaded by City staff.
(5) One revision of draft PAEP, Final Project Report, and Final Project Summary documents to address City review comments prior to transmittal to the State Project Manager. Multiple revisions not included.
(6) Preparation of Operational Reports not included.
(7) Preparation of Groundwater Grant quarterly progress reports not included. (8) Site visits with City staff and State Project Manager not included. (9) Photo monitoring before, during, and after project implementation not included.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 38
Task 3 Permitting Support
3.1 Division of Drinking Water (DDW) Drinking Water Supply Permit • Attend two (2) meetings with DDW staff to discuss amendments to the City’s Drinking Water Supply Permit.
• Review and provide comments on DDW’s proposed changes to City’s Drinking Water Supply Permit.
• Complete remaining Drinking Water Source Assessment and Protection (DWSAP) forms and finalize document as part of DDW Drinking Water Supply Permit amendment:
− Cover Page
− Checklist
− Assessment Summary
− Source Location Form
3.2 PG&E Coordination
• Inform PG&E of proposed changes to electrical loads at existing electrical distribution equipment.
• Compile and transmit electrical single-line diagrams and electrical load summaries to PG&E.
Deliverables:
(1) Comments on proposed changes to City’s Drinking Water Supply Permit. (2) Completed DWSAP forms.
Assumptions:
(1) Two (2) DDW coordination meetings, one (1) hour in duration, held via video conference, and attended by one (1) WSC staff member.
(2) Due to the uncertainty associated with the level of effort required for Task 3.1, 60 staff hours have been assumed for review of proposed changes to the City’s Drinking Water Supply Permit and completion of the DWSAP forms. (3) Due to the uncertainty associated with the level of effort required for Task 3.2, four (4) staff hours have been assumed.
(4) Well drilling permit applications not included.
(5) Preparation of Caltrans encroachment permit not included. (6) Preparation of City encroachment permits, which may be required for select monitoring wells, not included.
(7) Permit fees not included.
(8) Formal service application or service modification application to PG&E not included. (9) City building permit not included.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 39
Task 4 Technical Advisory Committee
4.1 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
• Establish a TAC that includes representatives from the Division, the State Water Board Division of Drinking Water (DDW), Regional Water Board, and applicable agencies. Submit the final list of TAC members, their roles and responsibilities, and affiliations to the State Project Manager for approval. • Convene a kickoff meeting to establish TAC goals and objectives, formalize roles, and create a schedule for future meetings. Submit a summary of the kickoff meeting to the State Project Manager.
• Conduct additional TAC meetings in accordance with the project schedule and submit agendas, meeting notes, and sign-in sheets for each meeting to the State Project Manager.
• Provide draft agenda for TAC review three (3) working days in advance of meeting. • Prepare and distribute meeting notes within two (2) working days of meeting.
Deliverables:
(1) TAC meeting agendas and notes.
Assumptions:
(1) Eight (8) TAC meetings (Q2 2025 through Q2 2027), one (1) hour in duration, held via video conference, and attended by two (2) WSC staff members.
Task 5 Planning, Design & Engineering
5.1 Groundwater Model
• WSC’s subconsultant, Cleath Harris Geologists, will perform the following scope. − Gather available historical and recent PCE concentration data from monitoring wells/supply wells and the recent borings in the plume area. − Estimate the current extent of the plume and produce concentration contours in the plume area.
− Develop initial estimates for contaminant transport parameters using available information.
− Update solute transport model with data and calibration. − Perform fate and transport analysis.
− Develop groundwater modeling scenarios to identify optimal extraction and treatment well locations to prevent plume migration.
− Assist in siting of monitoring and extraction and treatment wells.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 40
− Estimate total contaminant mass that can be extracted and treated from proposed extraction and treatment wells.
− Estimate clean-up times for optimal extraction scenario. − Prepare a draft technical memorandum summarizing the solute transport model development, simulations, and treatment recommendations. − Receive comments and finalize the technical memorandum. − Provide technical review, as needed, for the concurrent task Development of Extraction and Monitoring Plan.
5.2 Design Monitoring Wells
• Prepare plans, specifications, and cost opinion for 12 groundwater monitoring wells, with a minimum of 8 to be constructed. Plans are expected to include:
− Monitoring wells to be installed within public right-of-way. − Technical specifications outlining monitoring well site selections, proposed drilling methods, casing installation, well screen and filter pack and grout specifications. − Well construction schematics and site figures.
• Submit 30% plans, specifications, and cost opinion to the City for review. • Submit 60% plans, specifications, and cost opinion to the City for review and comment followed by submission to the TAC for comment and the State Project Manager for approval.
• Prepare 100% plans, specifications, and cost opinion including a summary identifying changes from responses to TAC comments on the 60% plans. • Submit the 100% plans, specifications, cost opinion, and summary of changes to the City for review and comment followed by submission to the TAC for comment and the State Project Manager for approval.
• Complete the bid documents in accordance with the approved design plans. Submit the bid documents to the City for review and comment followed by submission to the TAC for comment and the State Project Manager for approval. • WSC assumes monitoring wells will be located within public right-of-way or property owned by the City. Monitoring wells will be installed with a lid flush to the surface flush-mounted surface completions to avoid causing a public hazard/nuisance. • Prepare well drilling permit applications and submit to the County for review. WSC will pay the well drilling permit fees and be reimbursed the fees by the City. • Prepare no-fee encroachment permit applications for monitoring wells, all of which are expected to be installed in City streets.
• Prepare Caltrans encroachment permit application, if required, for monitoring wells.
Caltrans encroachment permit is anticipated to be a dual permit with no fee directly charged to the City.
• Perform site reconnaissance to evaluate the feasibility and constructability of proposed monitoring well locations.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 41
• Coordinate with City staff and the State Project Manager to finalize the number of monitoring wells to required to satisfy the Grant objectives. • Prepare draft and final Monitoring Well Siting Technical Memorandum.
5.3 Extraction Well & Wellhead Treatment Design
• Prepare plans, specifications, and cost opinion for the following extraction and treatment wells:
− Equipping the Highway 101 Well with a well building, pump, control panel, electrical system, packaged granular activated carbon treatment system, site improvements, chlorination, and fluoridation systems.
− Drill a new treatment well and equip the well with a well building, pump, control panel, electrical system, site improvements, and pipeline to connect to the treatment system located at the Highway 101 Well site.
− Well equipping and treatment systems are expected to be bid as one bid package and well drilling as a separate bid package.
− WSC will work with the City to determine if the pump and control panel lead time require pre-procurement using a separate bid package.
• Prepare and submit well siting memo and conceptual well drawings to the City and DDW for review.
• Prepare and submit Draft Preliminary Design Report (PDR) with 30% plans, specifications, and cost opinion to the City for review. • Submit 60% plans, specifications, and cost opinion to the City for review and comment followed by submission to the TAC for comment and the State Project Manager for approval.
• Prepare 100% plans, specifications, and cost opinion including a summary identifying changes from responses to TAC comments on the 60% plans. • Submit the 100% plans, specifications, cost opinion, and summary of changes to the City for review and comment followed by submission to the TAC for comment and the State Project Manager for approval.
• Complete the bid documents in accordance with the approved design plans. Submit the bid documents to the City for review and comment followed by submission to the TAC for comment and the State Project Manager for approval. • Prepare well drilling permit application and submit to the County for review. WSC will pay the well drilling permit fees and be reimbursed the fees by the City. • WSC will prepare technical documents to support the City’s Drinking Water Permit amendment to incorporate the new supply wells and treatment systems into the City’s permit.
• Prepare City building permit application and drawings to support the permit. • Perform a Drinking Water Source Assessment and Protection evaluation for the new and existing extraction wells consistent with DDW requirements. • Perform a topographic survey of the area surrounding the existing and proposed extraction well sites.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 42
• Prepare a geotechnical report documenting existing geotechnical conditions and design considerations for the Project.
5.4 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Development • Prepare a draft Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for project compliance with the Statewide Construction General Permit for Storm Water. • Prepare a final SWPPP incorporating the City’s review comments on the draft document.
• SWPPP to include:
− SWPPP requirements
− Project information
− Potential pollutants
− Best management practices (BMPs)
− Maintenance, inspection, and repair
− Training materials
− Construction site monitoring program
− Personnel and contractor responsibilities
− Site maps
− Erosion and sediment control plans
− Dewatering and disposal of groundwater
• Prepare a risk assessment for the SWPPP based on site conditions and information provided by the City related to project location, soils, and receiving waters. • Update the risk assessment based on the actual start and end dates of construction. • Prepare and compile Permit Registration Documents (PRDs) including the Notice of Intent (NOI). Post PRDs to the State Water Resources Control Board online database – the Storm Water Multi-Application Report Tracking System (SMARTS) • Participate in up to two (2), 1-hour meetings with City staff to discuss the SWPPP.
Deliverables:
(1) Fate and Transport Groundwater Model and Analysis Report. (2) Draft and final well drilling permit applications.
(3) City encroachment permit application.
(4) Caltrans encroachment permit application.
(5) Monitoring well technical specifications, cost estimates, and bidding documents. (6) Draft and Final Monitoring Well Siting Technical Memorandum. (7) Treatment well technical specifications, cost estimates, and bidding documents. (8) Response to comments.
(9) Draft and final SWPPP.
(10) SWPPP meeting agendas and notes.
Assumptions:
(1) Front-end documents to be provided by City.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 43
(2) City review comments to be provided in Microsoft Excel format. (3) Design review workshop to be held via video conference with a two-hour duration and attended by two (2) WSC staff members.
(4) Preliminary (30%) cost opinions consistent with Class 4 as defined by AACE International. Intermediate cost opinions (60%) consistent with Class 3 as defined by AACE International. Final cost opinions (100% and bid set) consistent with Class 2 as defined by AACE International.
(5) A building permit from the City Community Development Department will not be required and a formal plan check will not be performed. (6) An informal “counter check” will be performed by Community Development Department staff. A single counter check will be performed, support for multiple Community Development or Public Works Department plan checks is not included. (7) Design of fire protection systems and preparation of fire protection system performance specifications are not included.
(8) SWPPP to be developed based on new Construction General Permit requirements. (9) SWPPP to be prepared using a modified California Storm Water Quality Association template.
(10) Project risk rating of 2.
(11) Permit fees to be paid by City.
(12) City is Legally Responsible Party (LRP).
(13) Implementation and Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP) responsibilities by others. (14) SWPPP will not include extraction and monitoring well projects.
Task 6 Construction/Implementation Services
6.1 Bid Phase Services
• Attend pre-bid meeting and site walk for monitoring well and well equipping projects. • Prepare responses to requests for information and requests for clarification received from bidders during the bid advertisement period.
• Compile responses to bidder questions in formal addenda. • Incorporate changes to plans and technical specifications issued during the bid advertisement period into a conformed set of construction documents.
6.2 Construction Meetings
• Participate in weekly construction meetings for the Monitoring Well (Packet 1), Bob Jones Trail Well (Packet 2), and Bob Jones Trail Well and Highway 101 Well Equipping (Packet 3) Projects.
6.3 Final Well Design
• Plan, organize, and conduct final well design meetings for the Bob Jones Trail Well and monitoring wells within one (1) day following pilot hole drilling and geophysical logging.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 44
• Provide meeting notes within two (2) days of each meeting. • Prepare final well designs for the Bob Jones Trail Well and monitoring wells based on the results of the collected lithology and geophysical logs. • Final well designs will include recommended depth intervals for reamed borehole, diameter depths, well casing and screen, ancillary tubing, and annular materials, and filter pack gradations and slot sizes for well screens. • Prepare and submit draft well design memoranda (Bob Jones Trail Well and monitoring wells) to the City for review and approval.
• Prepare final well design memoranda incorporating City review comments. • Analyze data from step drawdown and constant rate pumping tests and prepare a draft memorandum with recommended operational parameters, including design pumping rate, short- and long-term drawdown characteristics, well efficiency, and recommended pump intake depth (Bob Jones Trail Well).
• Prepare a final pump setting and flow rate memorandum incorporating City review comments (Bob Jones Trail Well).
6.4 Submittal Review
• Review submittals, shop drawings, and samples for conformance with the contract documents and design intent.
• Prepare and transmit written submittal review comments. • Review substitution requests and provide written review comments.
6.5 Request for Information (RFI) Responses
• Review and respond to RFIs and requests for clarification from the contractor.
6.6 Contract Document Clarifications (CDCs)
• Prepare CDCs when necessary to clarify or refine information included in the contract documents.
• Coordinate with the construction manager to issue CDCs to the contractor under cover of a potential change order (PCO) or request for quote (RFQ) for pricing.
6.7 Start-Up Support
• Assist the contractor in the start-up of the equipment and systems installed as part of the project.
• Participate in up to four (4) commissioning and start-up meetings chaired by the City or construction manager.
• Review commissioning and start-up documentation prepared by the contractor for conformance with the contract documents.
• Provide up to 40 hours of on-site support for oversight of contractor’s performance and demonstration testing activities.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 45
6.8 Operations Manual
• Prepare draft operations manual for wells and granular activated carbon system. • Compile approved O&M manuals and include in operations manual as reference documents.
• Prepare final operations manual incorporating City review comments.
6.9 Punch List
• Participate in a site walk with the City and the construction manager to develop a project punch list.
• Tabulate punch list items in Microsoft Excel format and transmit to City and construction manager.
• Participate in a final site walk to confirm resolution of punch list items.
6.10 Record Drawings
• Prepare record drawings based on as-built drawings prepared by the contractor. • Provide electronic copies of record drawings in PDF and AutoCAD (most recent version).
6.11 Borehole Drilling, Logging and Reaming
• Provide full-time field oversight during conductor casing borehole drilling and installation of the conductor casing and cement sanitary seal for Bob Jones Trail Well. • Provide full-time field oversight during pilot borehole (Bob Jones Trail Well) and monitor well borehole drilling operations.
• Collect formation samples at 10-foot intervals (or more frequently if lithology changes) and visually log samples for material type and production potential using the United Soil Classification System.
• Provide full-time oversight during geophysical logging of the completed pilot borehole (Bob Jones Trail Well).
• Provide full-time oversight during the caliper and deviation surveys (Bob Jones Trail Well).
• Provide part-time field oversight during reaming of the pilot borehole to the final diameters and depths established in the final well design memorandum (Task 6.3).
6.12 Well Construction
• Provide full-time oversight during well casing, well screen, ancillary tubing (Bob Jones Trail Well), gravel pack, and annular seal installation. • Inspect gravel pack, well casing, and well screen material to confirm compliance with the contract documents and approved submittals.
6.13 Well Development
• Provide full-time field oversight during mechanical well development, including swabbing and bailing, dispersant addition, and airlifting.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 46
• Monitor and record parameters including pH, temperature, conductivity, turbidity, flow rate, time spent developing each screen section, frequency of swabbing, type and quantity of added dispersants, and parameters of water routed for disposal. • Provide full-time oversight during pumping development (Bob Jones Trail Well). • Monitor and record discharge parameters, surging frequency, pumping rate and water levels, and quality of water routed to WRRF for disposal (Bob Jones Trail Well). • Monitor tests performed by the contractor for sand content and specific capacity to determine the advancement of the development process and to verify that the well is developed to the point at which sand production is minimized and specific capacity is maximized.
6.14 Down Well Survey and Testing
• Provide full-time oversight during step drawdown and constant rate pumping tests.
Measure and record depth to water at regular intervals, confirm pumping rates, and measure and record water parameters at the end of each test (Bob Jones Trail Well). • Provide full-time oversight during sample collection and during the constant rate, and water level recovery testing (Bob Jones Trail Well). Measure and record depth to water at regular intervals, record pumping rates, and assist with collection of final groundwater sample (Bob Jones Trail Well).
• Provide full-time oversight during down well video survey to document postconstruction condition of the well structure following removal of the test pump and bailing of the well casing (Bob Jones Trail Well).
• Provide full-time oversight during dummy test, gyroscopic deviation test, and initial well disinfection in accordance with AWWA A100/C-654 standards (Bob Jones Trail Well).
Deliverables:
(1) Addenda.
(2) Conformed construction documents.
(3) Well design meeting notes.
(4) Draft and final well design memoranda.
(5) Draft and final well pump setting and discharge rate memorandum (Bob Jones Trail Well).
(6) Submittal review comments.
(7) RFI responses.
(8) CDCs.
(9) Draft and final operations manual (PDF).
(10) Punch list.
(11) Aquifer testing data files (manual and automated water level measurements for background, step drawdown, constant rate, and water level recovery) in electronic format (Excel).
(12) Record drawings (AutoCAD and PDF).
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 47
(13) Well drilling oversight daily field reports.
Assumptions:
(1) Construction phase duration of 12 months.
(2) Two pre-bid meetings (monitoring wells and Bob Jones Trail Well equipping). (3) City to plan, organize, and conduct pre-bid meetings. (4) Due to the uncertainty regarding the number of bidder questions received and the number of addenda required, the budget for addenda preparation is based on an assumed level of effort of 44 hours.
(5) Due to the uncertainty regarding the number of addenda issued and required updates to the bid documents, the budget for preparation of conformed documents is based on an assumed level of effort of 20 hours.
(6) Bid review and tabulation to be performed by City.
(7) Support for bid protest resolution not included.
(8) Final well design memoranda to be transmitted to contractor by City. (9) Construction meetings to be planned, organized, and conducted by others. (10) Participation in construction meetings as follows:
52 well equipping meetings
12 monitoring well meetings
12 extraction well meetings
(11) Construction meetings to be one (1) hour in duration, held via video conference, and attended by one (1) WSC staff member.
(12) Review of up to 90 submittals; two (2) staff hours per submittal on average. (13) Review of up to 40 RFIs; three (3) staff hours per RFI on average. (14) Preparation of two (2) CDCs.
(15) Start-up meetings to be held via video conference with a two-hour duration and attended by two (2) WSC staff members.
(16) Commissioning and start-up plan to be prepared by the contractor. (17) Operations manual will not include detailed standard operating procedures.
Operations manual will provide a general overview and description of the wells and treatment system.
(18) Record drawings will be prepared based on as-builts/redlines prepared by others.
WSC will not independently verify the accuracy of as-builts/redlines. (19) Record drawings will not be signed and sealed.
(20) Hard copies of record drawings will not be provided. (21) Construction management and inspection services not included. (22) Well construction field oversight subject to prevailing wage requirements. (23) Engineering and hydrogeological services during well construction (e.g., submittal reviews, meeting participation, RFI responses) are included in Task 6. (24) Construction staking or marking for the final well location will be provided by the City.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 48
(25) The drilling contractor will provide representative formation samples at 10-foot intervals for WSC’s field hydrogeologists to log and classify using the Unified Soils Classification System.
(26) The drilling contractor will provide a qualified laboratory to perform sieve analysis (grain size distribution) on formation samples selected by WSC and for gravel pack materials that are delivered to the well site, prior to constructing the well. (27) The drilling contractor will provide a state-certified laboratory for the analysis of water quality samples collected during pumping tests.
(28) The drilling contractor will record all measurements obtained from their work, such as water levels, pumping rates, pipe tallies, etc. and will be made available in the field to WSC.
(29) City to provide inspection and oversight for mobilization, utility clearance, traffic control, erection of sound walls, site restoration, demobilization, and all other work not specifically included in WSC’s scope of work.
(30) Engineering and hydrogeological support for construction of the optional Monitoring Well 6 not included (see Optional Task 1).
(31) Level of effort for well construction field oversight based on typical durations as detailed below and as reflected in the fee estimate. Well construction field oversight in excess of the hours estimated below will require authorization of additional budget.
Assumptions: Assumptions: Task No. Description
Field Oversight Hours
BJT Well
Monitoring
Wells
8.1 Borehole Drilling, Logging & Reaming 76 130
8.2 Well Construction 36 60
8.3 Well Development 100 60
8.4 Down Well Survey and Testing 39 0
Task 7 Public Outreach
7.1 Public Outreach
• Develop outreach materials including flyers, posters, brochures, and advertisements, and update the website and associated social media web pages to include Project progress and outcomes. Submit copies of the outreach materials and web links to the State Project Manager.
• Conduct a minimum of one (1) public workshop, inviting relevant non-governmental organizations and disadvantaged community representatives, prior to construction.
Submit the workshop materials, sign-in sheet(s), and photo documentation of the workshop to the State Project Manager.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 49
Deliverables:
(1) Outreach materials.
(2) Public workshop materials including PowerPoint presentation, sign-in sheet and photo documentation.
Assumptions:
(1) Public workshop to be one (1) hour in duration and attended by two (2) WSC staff.
Optional Task 1 Monitoring Well 6
O1.1 Monitoring Well 6 Design
Plan, organize, and conduct a final well design meeting for Monitoring Well 8 within one (1) day following pilot hole drilling and geophysical logging. Provide meeting notes within two (2) days of the meeting. Prepare final well design for Monitoring Well 6 based on the results of the collected lithology and geophysical logs.
Final well design will include recommended depth intervals for reamed borehole, diameter depths, well casing and screen, ancillary tubing, and annular materials. Prepare and submit draft well design memorandum to the City for review and approval.
Prepare final well design memorandum incorporating City review comments.
O1.2 Monitoring Well 6 Completion Report
Prepare a well completion report documenting the as-built well conditions.
O1.3 Monitoring Well 6 Borehole Drilling, Logging and Reaming Provide full-time field oversight during pilot borehole drilling operations. Collect formation samples at 10-foot intervals (or more frequently if lithology changes) and visually log samples for material type and production potential using the United Soil Classification System.
Provide part-time field oversight during reaming of the pilot borehole to the final diameters and depths established in the final well design memorandum (Task O1.1).
O1.4 Monitoring Well 6 Construction
Provide full-time oversight during well casing, well screen, gravel pack, and annular seal installation.
Inspect gravel pack, well casing, and well screen material to confirm compliance with the contract documents and approved submittals.
O1.5 Monitoring Well 6 Development
Provide full-time field oversight during well development, including swabbing, dispersant addition, and airlifting.
SLO PCE Prop 1 Round 3 Implementation
City of San Luis Obispo | 50
Monitor and record parameters including pH, temperature, conductivity, turbidity, flow rate, time spent developing each screen section, frequency of swabbing, type and quantity of added dispersants, and quality of water routed for disposal. Monitor tests performed by the contractor for sand content and specific capacity to determine the advancement of the development process and to verify that the well is developed to the point at which sand production is minimized and specific capacity is maximized.
Deliverables:
(1) Draft and final well design memorandum.
(2) Well design meeting agenda and notes.
(3) Draft and final well completion report.
Assumptions:
(1) Level of effort for well construction field oversight based on typical durations as detailed below and as reflected in the fee estimate. Well construction field oversight in excess of the hours estimated below will require authorization of additional budget.
Task No. Description Staff Hours
O1.3 Borehole Drilling, Logging & Reaming 10
O1.4 Well Construction 8
O1.5 Well Development 8
(2) City to provide inspection and oversight for mobilization, utility clearance, traffic control, erection of sound walls, site restoration, demobilization, and all other work not specifically included in WSC’s scope of work.
Optional Task 2 Well Construction Summary Report
O2.1 Well Construction Summary Report
Prepare draft well construction summary reports including the following:
− Chronology of well construction activities.
− Copy of Water Well Construction permit approved by County Department of Environmental Health Services and other permits required for the drilling/construction.
− A photographic log of key well construction activities/phases. − Copies of reviewed submittals and responses to contractor RFIs. − Lithologic log based on drill cuttings collected from the conductor and pilot boreholes.
− Borehole geophysical logs.