San Luis Obispo City Council
May 19, 2026

telephone number of the proposed transferee; the nature of \he proposed transferee's business and dc\a1ls of its business experience.

B. Lessor shall notify Lessee a\ least thirty days (30) days prior lo the Transfer Date whether Lessor approves or disapproves of the proposed trnnsfcr.

C. Any approved transferee shall assume and be deemed to have assumed this Lease and shall be jointly and severally liable with Lessee for the payment of rent and performance of the terms, covenants, and conditions of this Lease. No approved transfer shall be binding on Lessor until such trnnsferee shall deliver to Lessor a counterpart of the transfer agreement with contains a covenant of assumption by transferee but the failure or refusal to execute or deliver such instmment shall not release transferee from its liability as stated herein.

0. The consent of Lessor to any transfer shall not relieve Lessee of the obligation to obtain such consent to any further transfer. Further, neither this Lease nor any interest herein shall be subject to transfer by attachment, execution, proceedings in insolvency or bankruptcy (either voluntary or involuntary), or receivership. In the event of the transfer without the prior written consent of Lessor, such transfer shall be voidable at Lessor's election and, if voided by Lessor, shall convey no interest. Any transfer without Lessor's consent shall constitute a default of this Lease.

E. To obtain Lessor's consent to a sublease, Lessee shall meet the following requirements and Lessee's failure to mecl any rcquircmenl shall allow Lessor to wilhhold consent I) The Lessee must pay to Lessor the same amount of Annual Rent on the sublease tenant's behalf as lhe Lessee ("Additional Annual Rent"). For example, if there were two sublease tenants by the beginning of the third year of this Agreement, the total rent due from lhe Lessee would be S63,654: the Annual Rcnl for the Lessee ($21,218, which is the first year's rent of S20,000 increased by 3% for two years) and the Additional Annual Rent for the two sublease tenants (S2 I ,2 I 8 each). While the Lessee may require the sublease tenant to pay this amount as part of their sublease agreement with the Lessee, payment of the Additional Annual Rent is the sole responsibility of the Lessee, and is subject to the same temts, conditions and remedies as the Annual Rent. 1'olecommwiico1ions Fadlity Lease at Sama Rosa Park Page 15 o/27

2} Lessee shall notify Lessor at least sixty (60} days prior to the date when Lessee desires the sublease to take effect ("Sublease Date"}, which notice shall contain the name, address and telephone number of the proposed sublease tenant; the nature of the proposed sublease tenant's business and details of its business experience. The first year of Additional Annual Rent shall be paid prior to the Sublease Date and will be prorated to the Lessee's Annual Rent payment due date; and shall be due annually thereaf\cr with the Annual Rent.
3} Lessor and Lessee agree (by way of example and without limitation} that it shall he reasonable for Lessor to withhold its consent if any of the following exist or may exist: the proposed transferee 's use of the Premises conf\1ets with or is inconsistent with the use of the Premises stated herein; the Lessee is in d efault under this Lease at the time the request for sublease is made and has not cured such default, if the same can be cured, prior to ten ( IO} business days prior to the Sublease Date. 4} The sublease tenant is subject the same terms and conditions of this Agreement as the Lessee.
5} Lessor shall notify Lessee at least lif\een (15} days prior to the Sublease Date whether Lessor approves or disapproves of the proposed sublease.

23. No Pcnnits. Lessee shall not grant any rights-of-way, easements, fra nchises or permits in, on or across the Premises.

24. Encumbrances. Lessee shall take the Premises subject to any and all existing casements and other encumbrWlces.

25. Reservations. Lessor reserves lhe right 10 grant franchises, casements, rights-of-way or pennits for pipeline purposes which will not interfere with Lessee's use oflhc Premises.

26. Default. The occurrence of any of the fo llowing acts shall constitute a default by Lessee:

A. Failure to pay Annual Rent or Additional Annual Rent when due where such fa ilure shall continue for a period often (10} days af\cr Lessee's receipt ofwrillen notice from Lessor.

B. Failure to perform any o f the terms, covenants or conditions of this Lease if said failure is not cured within thirty (30) days ancr Lessee's receipt of written notice from Lessor o f said Telecommu11icallons Faciliiy l ease al Sanla Rosa Park Page 16 o/27

failure. If the default cannot reasonably be cured in thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice, Lessee shall not be in default if Lessee begins to cure within the thirty-day period and diligently proceeds to cure to completion. Lessor's notice shall describe the default and shall demand that Lessor perform or quit the Premises. No such notice shall be deemed a forfeiture or termination of the Lease unless Lessor so elects in the notice.

C. A11y al!empted assignment, transfer or sublease except as permitted in Section 22 hereof.

D. Failure to maintain all necessary permits and business licenses required by the City in its municipal or regulatory capacity or failure to pay any fees for permits or licenses to the City when due;
E. Failure to report or pay to the City all applicable sales taxes, transient occupancy taxes, business taxes, utility taxes or other excise taxes, when due.

Subject to the tem1s of this Section, if Lessee dues not comply with each term, covenant and condition of this Lease or if a default occurs, then Lessor may terminate this Lease and Lessor may lhcn enter the Premises and tnkc possession thereof provided, however, that these remedies are not exclusive but cumulative to other remedies provided by law in the event of Lessee's default, and the exercise by Lessor of one or more rights and remedies shall not preclude the Lessor's exercise of additional or different remedies for the same or any other default by Lessee.

F. Failure to perfom1 any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Lease if said failure is not cured within thirty (30) days after Lessee notifies Lessor of said failure shall constitute a default by Lessor of this Lease. If the default cannot reasonably be cured in thirty (30) days after receipt of such notice, Lessor shall not be in default if Lessor begins lo cure within the thirty (30) day period and diligently proceeds to cure to completion.

27. B.1ght ofEntry.

A. In the event of an emergency which poses an immediate threat of hami or damage to persons or property, Lessor may enter the Premises and take such actions as are required lo Te/eco1111111111icotio11s Facility l ease at Santa Rosa Park Page 17 ofll

protect persons or property from such immediate threat of harm or damage, provided that promptly after such emergency cntTy into the Premises (and in no event later than twenty-four (24) hours) Lessor gives telephonic and written notice to Lessee of Lessor's enrry into the Premises. In addition to Lessor's rights under the immediately preceding sentence, Lessor shall have the right, upon forty-eigh t (48) hours prior telephonic notification to Lessee (which notification shall specify the date and time at which Lessor seeks to enter the Premises), to enter the Premises to dctem1ine whether or not Lessee is complying with this Lease and to serve, post or keep posted any notice. Except in the event of an emergency, Lessor agrees that it shall not enter the Premises without a representative of Lessee being present, and Lessee agrees to make its representative promptly and readily available to accompany Lessor on the date and at the time given in Lessor's telephonic notice. If Lessee fails to make its representative available on the date and at the time given in Lessor's telephonic notice or at a mutually agreeable time, then Lessor may enter the Premises accompanied by a peace officer.
ll. Lessee shall install a lock box system on the Premises and give the City access to the lock box in order to allow the City to inspect the Premises pursuant to Paragraph A above.

28.· filgfil. Lessee shall not place, affix, maintain or permit any sign, adverlisemcnt, name, insignia, logo, descriptive material or similar item (collectively "sign") on the Premises without the prior written approval of Lessor. Any approved sign shall be maintained by Lessee in good condition at all times. Lessor may remove any sign not approved by Lessor al Lessee's cost. The cost of removal shall be additional rent.

29. Condemnation. If the whole of the Premises shall be taken by any public or quasi-public authority under the power of eminent domain, then this Lease shall terminate. If any parl of the Premises shall be taken under the power of eminent domain, then this Lease shall tem1inatc as to the part taken, as of the day possession (of that p~rl) is required fo r any public purpose, and on or before that day Lessee shall dect in writing either to terminate this Lease or to continue in possession of the remainder of the Premises provided, however, that rent shall only be reduced in proporlion to the amount of the Premises taken if Lessee is unable to operate at the same level after the condemnation as before the condemnation.

Telecomm1111icatio11s Facility Lease at Sn111a Rosa Park Page 18 o/27

All damages awarded for any taking shall belong to Lessor, whether such damages be awarded as compensation for diminution in value to the leasehold or lo the fee provided, however, that Lessor shall not be entitled lo any portion of the award made for loss of Lessee's business or relocMion expenses.

30. Nuisance. Lessee shall not do or pcnnil to be done in or on the Premises any act, which may be an unreasonable nuisance, annoyance or inconvenience to Lessor, Lessor's tenants on or occupants of adjoining property, or to lhc neighborhood.

31. Exculpation. Except as expressly provided herein, Lessor shall not be liable to Lessee for any damages to Lessee's property from any cause. To the extent pemtitted by law, Lessee waives all claims against Lessor for damage or injury to persons or property arising or alleged to have arisen from any cause whatsoever, except Lessor's sole negligence or willful misconduct or Lessor's breach of its obligations hereunder.

32. Waiver of Rights. The failure or delay of either party to insist on slrict enforcement of any term, covenant, or condition herein shall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy that such party may have and shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent or other breach of any tem1, covenant, or condition herein. The receipt and acceptance by Lessor of delinquent rent shall not constitute a waiver of any other default bul shall only constitute a waiver of timely payment for the particular rent payment involved. Any waiver by either party of any default or breach shall be in writing.

Either party's consent to or approval of any act by the other party requiring a party's consent or approval shall 1101 be deemed to waive such party's consent or approval of any subsequent acl of the other party.

33. l'arti~) Invalidity. If any tenn, covenant or condition of this Lease is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect.

34. ~rs in Interest. TI1is Lease shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the parties and their successors, heirs, personal representatives, approved transferees and assignees, and all of the parties hereto shall be joinlly and severally liable hereunder.

Telecom1mm;,·a1io11s Faciliry lease at Santa Rosa Park Page 19of27

35. Right to Re-Enter. Lessor acknowledges that Lessee's use of the Premises includes proprietary ITnde secrets. Lessor shall have no right whatsoever to enter the Premises except as provided in Paragraph 27.A. above, without Lessee's written consent which Lessee shall not unreasonably withhold, Lessee shall peaceably deliver possession of the Premises to Lessor on the effective date of termination or expiration of this Lease. On giving notice of tcm1ination to Lessee, Lessor shall have the right to re-enter and take possession of the Premises on the tennination or expiration date without further notice of any kind and without institution of summary or regular legal proceedings. Tem1ination of the Lease and re-entry of the Premises by Lessor shall in no way alter or diminish any obligation of 1.cssee under the Lease and shall not constitute an acceptance or surrender. Lessee waives any and all right of redemption under any existing or future law, in the event of eviction from the Premises and in the event Lessor re-enters and takes possession. Lessee agrees that should the manner and method used by Lessor in re-entering or taking possession afier breach by Lessee gives Lessee a cause of action for damages or in forcible entry and detainer, the total amount of damages to which Lessee shall be entitled due to the re-entering shall be One Dollar ($1.00). Lessee agrees that this Section may be fil ed in any such action and that when filed it shall be a stipulation by Lessee fixing the total damages to which Lessee is entitled in such action.

36. Holding Over. If Lessee holds over and remains in possession of the Premises afier the expiration of the Lease, such holding over shall be constrned as a tenancy from month to month on the same terms, covenants, and conditions herein, except that monthly rent shall be one-twclfih (1/12) of one hundred twenty-fi\•e percent (125%) of the annual rent then in effect. Nothing in this Section shall be constrncd as a consent by Lessor to any holding over by Lessee.

37. Time. Time is of the essence in this Lease and every provision hereof.

38. Attorney's Fees. In any action or proceeding relating to this Lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs, including reasonable attorney's fees and court costs.

39. Integration and Amendments. 111is Lease represents and constitutes the entire understanding between the parties and supereedes all other agreements and communication between the Te/ecommrmications Fncl/i/y Lease al Sama Rosa Park

parties, oral or written, concerning the subject matter herein. 111is Lease shall not be modified except in writing duly signed by the parties and referring to this Lease.

40. Recordatjon. Concurrently with the execution of this Lease, Lessor shall execute before a notary and deliver to Lessee for recording a "Memorandum of Lease" substantially in the form of Exhibit "C" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein (the "Memorandum"). Lessee may record the Memorandum and shall pay any fees or taxes applicable lo or arising from said recordalion.

Upon expiration or sooner termination of this Lease, l essee shall, at its sole cost, immediately record a Quitclaim Deed with respect tn its interest under this l ease.

41. Governing Law. This Lease shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

42. ~- 'The various headings and numbers herein and the grouping of the terms hereof into separate sections, paragraphs and clauses are for convenience only and shall not be considered a part hereof, and shall have no effect on the construction or inlcrprciation of this Lease.

43. 8Jm11doned Pr~ 111e vacating or abandonment of the Premises by Lessee shall include but not be hmitcd to the failure of 1.csscc to occupy the Premises for a continuous period of fortyfive (45) days or more while not paying rent. If lessee abandons the Premises, title to any personal property belonging to Lessee and left on the Premises forty-five (45) days after such abandonment shall be deemed to have been transferred to Lessor. Lessor shall thereafter have the right to remove and to dispose of said property without liability to lessee or to any person claiming under Lessee, and shall have no duty to account therefor.

44. Complionee with the law. Lessee shall comply with all laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of all federal, slate and local governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Premises and business thereon.

45. Quiet Enjoyment Lessor covenants that, if Lessee performs the terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease, Lessee shall peaceably and quietly hold and enjoy the Premises.

Telecomm1111icnU011s Facility Lease at Santa Rosa Park Page l l ofl7

46. Lessor's Reprcscnlalion of Authority. Lessor reprcscnls Iha\ it has title lo lhe Premises and full authority to execute this Lease and to granl the casements and access lo the Premises. Lessor further represents that there are no undisclosed liens, judgments, impcdimenls or exceptions of title on the Premises that would affect this Lease.

47. Non-Interference Provision. Lessor will use its best efforts to provide Lessee with notice of any applications received from any other communications companies wishing to utilize ony part of Santa Rosa Park. Further, Lessor will use its best elTorts to not lease property in Santa Rosa Park to other communication companies, nor to use Santa Rosa Park for comnmnicalions purposes, \hat might interfere with Lessee's use of the Premises. Jn the event Lessor or any other communication company on Santa Rosa Park docs, in fac t, interfere with Lessee's use of the Premises, Lessor shall eliminate, or cause to be eliminated, such interference within seventy-two (72) hours of written notice by Lessee. If such interference is not eliminated in such time period, Lessee may exercise any right or remedy at law or in equity to eliminate the interference or may tcm1inate this Lease. fN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Lease with all of the formalities required by law as of the date first above written.

LESSOR:

CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a
Municipal Corporation
By:

Lee Price, City Clerk
Telecomm1111ications Facility l ease at Santa Rosa Park LESSEE:

PACIFIC BELL WIRELESS LLC,
a Nevada limited liability company
d/b/a/ CJNGULAR WIRELESS
By: GSM Facilities, LLC, its sole member
By: Cingular Wireless LLC, its agent
By: ~~_..wa>t-J~'><><JM.--=~­
Charles Vrane ,
Vice Presiden , Special Projects.IReal Estate

1 PTI Site US-CA-1258/ Santa Rosa Park
PTI US Towers II LLC
999 Yamato Road, Suite 100
Boca Raton, FL 33431

SECOND AMENDMENT TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY LEASE AT

SANTA ROSA PARK

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY
LEASE AT SANTA ROSA PARK (“Second Amendment”) is executed this ______ day of _____________, 202___, and is effective April 1, 2023 (“Effective Date”) by and between CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, a California municipal corporation, having an address at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 (“Lessor”) and PTI US Towers II LLC, having a principal office located at 999 Yamato Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431 (“Lessee”).

WHEREAS, Lessor and PACIFIC BELL WIRELESS, LLC a Nevada limited liability company d/b/a CINGULAR WIRELESS, entered into that certain Telecommunications Facility Lease at Santa Rosa Park dated February 11, 2003, as thereafter amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as "Lease") and assigned to Lessee, PTI US Towers II LLC, for Lessee’s use of a portion of the real property (“Premises”), located at 190 Santa Rosa Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 (hereinafter referred to as “Land”), being more particularly described in the attached Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee desire and intend to amend and supplement the Lease as provided herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby, acknowledged, the parties hereto covenant, agree, and bind themselves to the following modifications to the Lease:

1. Section 3. Term, of the Lease is hereby amended to include the following:

In addition to the Renewal Terms as referenced in the Lease, the Lease is hereby amended to include four (4) additional successive Renewal Terms of five (5) years, each of which shall be deemed automatically extended unless Lessee notifies Lessor of its intention not to renew the Lease at least sixty (60) days prior to the commencement of the succeeding Renewal Term. The first additional Renewal Term shall commence on April 1, 2023, upon the expiration of the Renewal Term expiring on March 30, 2023.

In the event Lessor determines in its reasonable discretion that the Premises are required for public purposes, during each Renewal Term Lessor may terminate this Lease upon providing two (2) years’ prior written notice. Following such notice, the parties shall negotiate in good faith to identify a potential relocation site within the Land. Should the parties fail to reach an agreement on a mutually acceptable site, or if Lessee is unable or

2 PTI Site US-CA-1258/ Santa Rosa Park
unwilling to relocate, this Lease shall terminate automatically upon the expiration of the two-year notice period.

2. Section 4. Rent, subsection A, of the Lease is hereby deleted and replaced with the following, wherein all other subsections of Section 4 remain unchanged and in full force and effect:

A. Lessee shall pay to Lessor the sum of Forty-Five Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($45,000.00) (“Annual Rent”) and Additional Annual Rent per tenant in the same amount as Annual Rent (as further set forth in Section 22.E.), beginning upon Lessee’s payment of Annual Rent due and payable on or before April 1, 2026. All payments of Annual Rent previously provided by Lessee to Lessor for calendar years 2023, 2024 and 2025 are acknowledged as received by Lessor. Partial payment of Lessee’s Annual Rent due and payable on or before April 1, 2026 is acknowledged as received by Lessor, and Lessee and Lessor agree to reconcile the full amount of Annual Rent due for such period for which Lessee shall provide a true-up differential payment to Lessor within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date of this Second Amendment.

3. Section 19. Notice, of the Lease is hereby amended as follows:

LESSOR: City of San Luis Obispo
990 Palm Street
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
LESSEE: PTI US Towers II LLC
999 Yamato Road, Suite 100
Boca Raton, FL 33431

4. Within thirty (30) days of full execution of this Second Amendment, Lessee shall pay to Lessor a one-time payment of Twenty-Five Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($25,000.00).

Said amount constitutes a one-time signing bonus, and Lessor’s acceptance thereof shall confirm that neither Lessee nor Lessor are in default of any material term or condition of the Lease, including the payment of Annual Rent, at the time of said payment.

5. Capitalized terms not defined in this Second Amendment will have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Lease.

6. This Second Amendment will be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the state in which the Land is located without regard to principles of conflicts of law.

7. Except as specifically set forth in this Second Amendment, the Lease is otherwise unmodified and remains in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and reaffirmed. In

3 PTI Site US-CA-1258/ Santa Rosa Park
the event of any inconsistencies between the Lease and this Second Amendment, the terms of this Second Amendment shall take precedence.

8. Lessor acknowledges that the exhibits attached to the Lease may be incomplete or contain inaccuracies and, accordingly, Lessee may replace and substitute such exhibits at its cost and with written consent of Lessor, with an accurate survey and/or legal descriptions of the Premises and re-record this Second Amendment with copy provided to Lessor. Following such re-recording, the descriptions contained therein shall serve as the descriptions for the same for all purposes under the Lease.

9. Lessor represents and warrants to Lessee that Lessor is the sole owner in fee simple title to the Land and Lessor’s interest under the Lease and that consent or approval of no other person is necessary for Lessor to enter into this Second Amendment.

10. This Second Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts and by the different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when executed shall be, deemed to be an original but all of which taken together shall constitute one, and the same Second Amendment.

11. Lessee shall have the right to record this Second Amendment. [The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank. Signatures to follow.]

4 PTI Site US-CA-1258/ Santa Rosa Park
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment as of the day and year first above written.

LESSOR:

City of San Luis Obispo, a California
municipal corporation
By: ___________________________________
Print Name: _________________________
Title: __________________________________
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy or validity of that document.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

COUNTY OF )
On _________________________, 202___, before me, ____________________________ personally appeared __________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
____________________________________
Notary Public________________________
My Commission Expires _______________
(NOTARY SEAL)

5 PTI Site US-CA-1258/ Santa Rosa Park
WITNESSES: LESSEE:

PTI US Towers II LLC
999 Yamato Road, Suite 100
Boca Raton, FL 33431
_______________________________________ By: ________________________________

Print Name: __________________________
_______________________________________
Print Name: __________________________

STATE OF FLORIDA

COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of [X] physical presence or [ ] online notarization, this _____ day of _______________________, 202___, by _________________________, on behalf of said company, who is personally known to me and did not take an oath.
___________________________________
Notary Public ________________________
My Commission Expires _______________
(NOTARY SEAL)

6 PTI Site US-CA-1258/ Santa Rosa Park
EXHIBIT “A”

Item 6a
Department: Community Development
Cost Center: 4006
For Agenda of: 5/19/2025
Placement: Public Hearing
Estimated Time: 60 minutes
FROM: Timmi Tway, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Mallory Patino, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S

DECISION TO REVOKE A USE PERMIT FOR OPERATION OF A
FRATERNITY ORGANIZATION AT 280 CALIFORNIA BLVD (MOD-0036- 2026, APPL-0174-2026)

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Draft Resolution entitled, “Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, denying an appeal and upholding the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for a fraternity located at 280 California Boulevard.

The project is exempt from environmental review under Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) and Section 15270 (Projects which a Public Agency Rejects or Disapproves) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines as represented in the council agenda report and attachments dated May 19, 2026 (MOD0036-2026, APPL-0174-2026).”

REPORT-IN-BRIEF
On August 2, 1983, City Council approved a Use Permit (U1099) to allow Alpha Epsilon Pi (Appellant) to operate as a fraternity at 280 California Boulevard. On November 13, 2024, the Planning Commission re-reviewed the Use Permit due to confirmed code and Use Permit violations and approved a modification (USE-0625-2024) to allow continued operations with revised Conditions of Approval. Since the approval and modification of this Conditional Use Permit (CUP), the Appellant has resided at and utilized the property for fraternity activities. In 2026, the Community Development Director (Director) referred the Conditional Use Permit to the Planning Commission for a second re-review based on several recent violations of the permit conditions.

On March 11, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for the rereview of the CUP for the fraternity. The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to revoke the CUP because they could not make the required findings to approve a CUP enumerated in San Luis Obispo Municipal Code (SLOMC) §17.110.070 (March 11, 2026 Planning Commission Minutes). Specifically, the Planning Commission found that the design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the use was not compatible with residential uses in the vicinity (§17.110.070(A)(3)), and that continued use of the property as a fraternity under the Use Permit was not appropriate for the subject location, was incompatible with the neighborhood, and would be detrimental to the health, safety, and

Item 6a
welfare of persons living or working at the site or in the vicinity (§17.110.070(A)(5) and §17.86.130(B)(1)). The Planning Commission was not satisfied that any set of conditions would secure these purposes (Resolution No. PC-1117-2026). This decision does not prevent the Appellant from re-applying for a new use permit if they choose.

On March 23, 2026, Joshua Pinksy, on behalf of the Sigma Omega Chapter of Alpha Epsilon Pi, filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke the CUP (APPL-0174-2025) (Attachments B – Appeal Submittal and C - Appellant’s 3-11-26 Planning Commission Hearing Agenda Correspondence). As described in the Appeal Submittal, the Appellant does not concur with the findings that form the basis of the Planning Commission’s decision. The Appellant requests that City Council grant the appeal, reverse the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke the Use Permit, and adopt a modified Conditional Use Permit with clear and enforceable conditions that ensure longterm compliance and accountability.

POLICY CONTEXT
General Plan
Within the General Plan, Land Use Element (LUE) Policy 2.2.6 (Neighborhood Characteristics) directs the City to promote livability, quiet enjoyment, and safety for all residents, and highlights that one characteristic of a quality neighborhood includes a sense of personal safety. LUE Policy 2.2.1 (Neighborhood Identity) encourages the City to work with residents to address neighborhood specific issues. Additionally, Goal 7 of the Housing Element (Neighborhood Quality) is to maintain, preserve, and enhance the quality and livability of neighborhoods.

Major City Goals
One of the 2025-2027 Major City Goals is “Housing and Neighborhood Livability – Healthy, Safe, and Affordable,” which specifically includes a focus on fostering diverse, connected, and safe neighborhoods that are livable for all.

Zoning Regulations (SLOMC Chapter 17)
Per Table 2-1 of SLOMC (Uses Allowed by Zone), the establishment of a fraternity in the R-4 zone requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a fraternity is subject to the requirements listed below to ensure its consistency with the General Plan and Zoning Regulations and its compatibility with existing and future land uses in the vicinity:
 Section 17.110.060 (Minor Use Permits and Conditional Use Permits – Criteria for Approval)
 Section 17.110.070 (Minor Use Permits and Conditional Use Permits – Required Findings)
 Section 17.86.130(B) (Fraternities and Sororities – Required Findings)

Item 6a
Per SLOMC §17.102.020(C)(7), revocation of a Conditional Use Permit is a quasi-judicial process providing for the review of potential violations of conditions of approval for an authorized use, and for the revocation of such approval based upon findings set forth in Chapter 17.110. Per SLOMC §17.126.040(B), decisions of the Planning Commission shall be appealed to City Council.

DISCUSSION
Table 1. Site Data
Appellant Alpha Epsilon Pi
Figure 1 – Project Site
General Plan
Land Use
Designation
High Density
Residential (HDR)
Zone High-Density
Residential (R-4)
Site Area Approximately 0.3
acre
Environmental
Determination
Categorically exempt
from environmental
review under CEQA
Guidelines Section
15061(b)(3) (Common
Sense Exemption) and
Section 15270
(Projects which a
Public Agency Rejects
or Disapproves)

BACKGROUND
On August 2, 1983, the City Council denied an appeal and upheld the Planning Commission’s approval of a Use Permit, U1099, to establish the fraternity for Alpha Epsilon Pi at 280 California Boulevard (Attachment D – Resolution No. 5189 [1983 Series]). Approval of the Use Permit included a residential addition/remodel and various site improvements. Since the approval of this Use Permit, the Appellant has improved and used the project site as their residence and for their fraternity activities.

In 2024, based on confirmed code and Use Permit violations, the Community Development Director (Director) forwarded the Use Permit for re-review to the Planning Commission in accordance with Condition No. 13
1 of U1099. On November 13, 2024, the

1 Condition 13 of U1099: All reasonable written citizen or Police Department complaints received by the Community Development Department shall be forwarded to the representative of the Interfraternity Council and Panhellenic Council for their review and comment prior to review by the Planning Commission in accordance with a complaint review process established between the city and the Interfraternity Council and Panhellenic Council. Said review by representative of the Interfraternity Council and Panhellenic Council shall not include the names of the complaining parties unless said complaining parties consent to the use of their names.

Item 6a
Planning Commission approved a modification (USE-0625-2024) to allow continued operations as a fraternity with revised Conditions of Approval (Attachment E – Resolution No. PC-1092- 24). Modification of the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) included a 25-person maximum for routine meetings, gatherings, or events; provisions for special events with more than 25 people through Director approval; provision for re-review if conduct on the permitted premises results in three (3) citations within any 12-month period for a violation of law or permit condition; and grounds for the revocation of the permit based on failure to comply with Conditions or code requirements, violations of Federal, State, or local law, conduct that constitutes a public nuisance or that causes adverse impacts on the health, safety, or welfare of persons in the vicinity of the use.

In April 2025, while operating under the modified CUP, the Police Department issued two citations to the fraternity for noise violations, the first on April 16, 2025, at approximately 10:00 PM with approximately 150 people present, and the second on April 18, 2025, at approximately 10:00 PM with approximately 100 people present. On July 15, 2025, Code Enforcement issued a Notice of Violations (NOV; Attachment F) related to the citations issued in April, which resulted in a violation of the CUP, specifically Conditions No. 4, 9, 10, and 12 (Attachment E – Resolution No. PC-1092-2024 (USE-0625-2024)). The NOV included a warning that issuance of one more citation before April 16, 2026, would result in a re-review of the CUP, in accordance with Condition No. 2 of USE-0625-2024 (Attachment E – Resolution No. PC-1092-2024 (USE-0625-2024)).

The Police issued a third citation for a noise violation on October 29, 2025, at approximately 9:30 PM with approximately 100 people present. Issuance of the citation resulted in violations of CUP Conditions No. 4, 9, 10, and 12. As this citation was the third issued within a 12-month period2, staff notified the fraternity and property owner on January 29, 2026, that the CUP would be re-reviewed by the Planning Commission, in accordance with Condition No. 2 of USE-0625-2024.

Planning Commission Action
On March 11, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for the rereview of the CUP, USE-0625-2024, to consider the continuation of the fraternity use at 280 California Boulevard under MOD-0036-2026 (3-11-26 PC Agenda Report). In evaluating whether to revoke, modify, or continue the CUP, the Planning Commission considered the findings outlined in SLOMC §17.110.070(A) and §17.86.130(B), listed below, which are required to approve a Use Permit for a fraternity or sorority use:

17.110.070(A)

1. The proposed use is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan;

2 The fraternity organization appealed all three citations. One citation appeal was dismissed due to the appeal being filed after 10 calendar days from citation issuance. The other two citations went to an Administrative Citation Appeal Hearing and both citations were upheld by the Hearing Officer.

Item 6a

2. The proposed use is allowed or conditionally allowed within the applicable zone and complies with all other applicable provisions of these zoning regulations and the municipal code;

3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity;

4. The site is physically suitable in terms of:
a. Its design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed use;
b. Traffic generation and the provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access;
c. Public protection services (e.g., fire protection, police protection, etc.); and
d. The provision of utilities (e.g., potable water, schools, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.).

5. The establishment and subsequent operation or conduct of the use will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use.

17.86.130(B)

1. As conditioned, the project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of persons living or working at the site or in the vicinity because conditions have been included that place limits on the number of persons allowed on site, restrict activities, provide adequate parking, and limit potential disturbances to neighboring properties. The project will be compatible with site constraints and the character of the neighborhood.

2. The proposed project is consistent with General Plan Land Use Policy 2.6.5 and Housing Element Policy 8.6 to locate student housing projects, fraternities, and sororities in close proximity to the Cal Poly campus and other student-oriented uses and housing.

3. As conditioned, the proposed use is consistent with the zoning regulations because the number of residents is consistent with the group housing maximum occupancy limits and the parking configuration is consistent with neighboring properties and results in an adequate number of parking spaces for residents.

The Planning Commission received and considered agenda correspondence (3-11-26 Agenda Correspondence) and public testimony. In summary, the applicant's testimony acknowledged past violations but highlighted reduced citations in the past year, improvements to fraternity organizational safety, and increased neighborhood outreach efforts. The applicant and other members of the public emphasized the fraternity’s role as a Jewish student community organization and space. One commenter opposed renewal, citing ongoing noise, disruptive behavior, and neighborhood impacts.

The Planning Commission considered all evidence, including staff’s evaluation and recommendation, and the applicant and public testimony. Due to the organization’s

Item 6a
repeated citations for noise violations, repeated exceedance of the event gathering capacity, and failure to apply for permits or provide required parking and transportation plans for special events, the Planning Commission determined the design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the site as a fraternity were not compatible with residential uses in the vicinity. The Planning Commission also found that continued use as a fraternity was not appropriate for the subject location, incompatible with the neighborhood, and detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of persons living or working at the site or in the vicinity. As such, the required findings enumerated in SLOMC §17.110.070(A)(3), §17.110.070(A)(5), and §17.86.130(B)(1), could not be made by the Planning Commission.

The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to revoke the Use Permit, based on the findings specified in Resolution No. PC-1117-2026. This decision does not prevent the Appellant from re-applying for a new use permit if they choose.

APPEAL
On March 23, 2025, Joshua Pinksy, on behalf of Alpha Epsilon Pi - Sigma Omega Chapter, filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke the CUP (APPL-0174-2025) (Attachment B – Appeal Submittal). Within the arguments made in the Appeal Submittal, the Appellant references their Agenda Correspondence from the March 11, 2026 Planning Commission Hearing (Attachment C). As described in Attachments B and C, Alpha Epsilon Pi disagrees with the Planning Commission’s findings that continued use of the property as a fraternity would harm the health, safety, and welfare of the nearby community and is incompatible with the neighborhood characteristics. The Appellant requests that the City Council uphold the appeal, reverse the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke the Use Permit, and amend the existing permit conditions to ensure long-term compliance and accountability.

The Appeal Submittal can be distilled into two issues, which are summarized and discussed in the following analysis. Appeal arguments are provided for each issue within subsections, with staff response included directly below (indented) to address each argument.

Appeal Issue No. 1
The Appellant provides that continued use of the site as a fraternity with revised conditions (discussed in Appeal Issue No. 2, below) would be compatible with the neighborhood and not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the nearby community. The Appellant includes three main reasons to support their argument, provided below with staff response (indented) directly following.

Appeal Issue No. 1 – Reason No. 1
The Appellant states that with the property located in the R-4 zone, it is the most appropriate zone for higher-intensity residential uses, such as fraternity operations. The Appellant includes that revocation of the CUP could lead to spreading similar activities

Item 6a
into lower-density, R-1 or R-2 neighborhoods, rather than concentrating activity in areas zoned for it.

Staff Response to Appeal Issue No. 1 – Reason No .1
Operation of a fraternity (as defined in SLOMC §17.156.014) is conditionally allowed in the R-3 and R-4 zones, both intended for high-density residential use.

While high-density residential uses may be compatible with fraternity or sorority uses, fraternity or sorority uses are not allowed by right in these zones. Instead, fraternity or sorority uses require approval of a CUP so the City can determine whether the use is compatible with existing or desired conditions in their neighborhoods. This provides an opportunity to evaluate site-specific conditions, adequate support facilities, and potential neighborhood impacts such as noise, parking, and property maintenance.

Additionally, revocation of a CUP requires fraternity operations to cease at the subject location but does not authorize or direct fraternity activity to relocate into other residential zones. Fraternity-related activities, including but not limited to hosting special events, are not permitted in the R-1 and R-2 zones, which are intended for single-family and medium-density residential uses. Any fraternity operation without an approved CUP, in any zone, would constitute a land use violation subject to Code Enforcement or other legal actions. All properties and residents are subject to the Noise Ordinance and all applicable City regulations.

Appeal Issue No. 1 – Reason No. 2
The Appellant states that they have shown measurable organizational improvement. They provide that the organization has seen an approximately 85% decrease in violations over the last two years, from receiving 13 citations in the 2023-2024 academic year, to 2 citations in the 2024-2025 academic year, and only 1 citation in the current, 2025-2026, academic year, demonstrating a long-term commitment to compliance that was not adequately considered in the Planning Commission’s decision.

The Appellant includes that while the existing condition measures compliance on a rolling calendar-year basis, the organization operates under Cal Poly’s academic calendar. The two April citations and the October citation which led to the March 2026 re-review pertain to different academic years. The Appellant argues that the 12-month framework included in Condition No. 2 of USE-0625-2024 obscures a more accurate view of the organization’s behavior and improvement, which they believe deserves more consideration.

Staff Response to Appeal Issue No. 1 – Reason No. 2
Several complaints and Use Permit violations triggered the Planning Commission to re-review the original Use Permit and the modified Conditional Use Permit.

First Re-Review – In the 2023-2024 Cal Poly academic year, during which the Appellant received 13 citations, Code Enforcement issued two Notices of Violations related to those confirmed code and Use Permit violations, in March 2024 and June 2024. Based on these violations, the original Use Permit, U1099, was re-reviewed by the Planning Commission, in accordance with Condition No. 13 of U1099 (Attachment D). On November 13, 2024, the Planning Commission

Item 6a
approved a modification to allow the fraternity to continue operations with revised Conditions of Approval. One of these revised conditions established a requirement for re-review if conduct on the premises results in three citations within any 12- month period for a violation of law or permit condition. This specific condition language was first drafted during the October 15, 2024, City Council Meeting as part of the review of an appeal of Planning Commission’s decision to approve a fraternity CUP. The rolling 12-month review timeline was adopted for alignment with existing Code Enforcement procedures and the desire for ongoing accountability while considering tenant turnover from academic year to year. In the effort to standardize conditions across use permits, and the reasons stated above, Planning Commission adopted the same condition language.

Second Re-Review – While operating under the modified CUP, the Police Department issued three citations for noise violations on April 16, April 18, and October 29, 2025; Police noted approximately 100 to 150 people on site during these incidents. In July 2025, Code Enforcement issued a Notice of Violations relating to the citations issued in April 2025 for violation of the CUP. Specifically, the citations and related incidents resulted in violations of Conditions No. 4, 9, 10, and 12, provided below. Code Enforcement provided warning in the Notice of Violations that issuance of one more citation before April 16, 2026, would result in a re-review of the CUP by the Planning Commission.

The above-mentioned conditions are as follows:

4. Routine meetings and gatherings for the fraternity shall be limited to a maximum of 25 people, except as otherwise approved by the Community Development Director for special events. If the fraternity hosts special events involving more than 25 people, a transportation management plan to reduce impacts to the surrounding neighborhood shall be submitted to the Community Development Department, at least 30 days prior to the event taking place, for review and approval. No exception from the Noise Ordinance shall be approved by the Director as part of the special event.

9. The fraternity use shall comply with Table 1 (Exterior Noise Limits) of Section 9.12.060 (Exterior Noise Limits) between the extended hours of 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m.

10. Prior to a special event approved by the Community Development Director pursuant to Condition No. 4, the fraternity shall provide written notification of the event to occupants within 300 feet of the site. The written notification shall include the date, hours, and contact information for the responsible party for the special event. No exception from the Noise Ordinance shall be approved by the Director as part of the special event.

12. Failure to comply with any of the above conditions or code requirements, or the conduct of the use so as to constitute a violation of Federal, State, or local law, or so as to constitute a public nuisance or so as to cause adverse impacts on the health, safety, or welfare of persons in the vicinity of this use is prohibited and may constitute grounds for the revocation of this permit.

Item 6a
Additionally, while the information presented to and relied upon by the Planning Commission was sufficient to revoke the use permit, after the March 11th Planning Commission hearing, staff also received records of event registration forms submitted by Interfraternity Council organizations to the Cal Poly Fraternity and Sorority Life (FSL) office. This additional information is relevant to staff’s response to the arguments made in Appeal Issue No. 1 – Reason No. 2. These records are self-reported, but do not include confirmation if the events occurred. Records indicate that 30 events were registered with FSL at 280 California Boulevard since the modification of the CUP (from November 13, 2024, to April 10, 2026) (see Attachment G – event registration list). In 2024, event registration forms did not require an expected attendance count; in 2025, this requirement applied only to events involving alcohol; and in 2026, it applied to all events, therefore, not all records include an expected attendance count. Of the 30 registered events, 16 included an expected attendance count that ranges from 65 to 160 individuals, all exceeding the limit of 25 individuals for gatherings without a special event permit per Condition No. 4. No special event permits were applied for or issued for these 16 events as required by Condition No. 4.

One of the 30 FSL registered events was confirmed by the Police Department, as it resulted in the issuance of a citation for a noise violation during the event on April 18, 2025 (Attachment G). It also appears that not all events hosted at 280 California Boulevard are registered events with the Cal Poly FSL office, as two of the three citations received (April 16 and October 29, 2025) occurred on nights where no event was registered to occur on site.

The organization has been aware of the conditions set forth in the November 2024 modification, which triggers a re-review if three citations are received during any 12-month period and still held events that resulted in citations and violations of the CUP. The self-reported, registered events, though unconfirmed, show that the organization has continuously and regularly planned to host events that surpass the maximum gathering capacity without pursuing permits that allow staff to evaluate the activities’ expected impacts and ensure that such activities are compatible with their surroundings and the intent of the Zoning regulations.

Furthermore, during the March 11, 2026, Planning Commission hearing, the fraternity representative presented information about their reduction in citations in recent years. The Planning Commission considered this information, as well as the information relating to the multiple confirmed use permit violations and previous Planning Commission decisions for similar issues. Based on all the evidence discussed, the Planning Commission was unable to make the required findings to grant continuation of Conditional Use Permit USE-0625-2024, as required under SLOMC §17.110 and revoked the Use Permit.

Appeal Issue No. 1 – Reason No. 3
The Appellant surveyed 14 residents that live within 200 feet of the property. The Appellant argues that results from the survey of neighbors do not support claims of ongoing harm, with 12 neighbors reporting no disturbances linked to the fraternity and 2

Item 6a
neighbors noting occasional noise that could not be directly linked to 280 California Boulevard. The Appellant states that this direct input from their immediate community contradicts the Planning Commission’s conclusion that their operations are detrimental to the neighborhood.

Staff Response to Appeal Issue No. 1 – Reason No. 3
No evidence has been provided to support the claims relating to neighborhood surveys. Staff did not receive a copy of the survey results or information related to the manner of survey, the names, addresses, or length of tenancy of those surveyed, or the dates, times, transcripts, or recordings of the surveys.

Additionally, while the Appellant states that some neighbors have not voiced concerns with the fraternity, the citations received over the past few years provide evidence that there have been instances of noise violations disrupting the neighborhood.

Appeal Issue No. 2
The Appellant provides that revised conditions of approval would support the findings required for continued use of the site as a fraternity. The Appellant has proposed revisions to several of the existing conditions of approval of the CUP as well as new conditions that they think would provide a clear and enforceable path forward (Attachments B and C).

They specifically propose changes and provide information about challenges relating to Conditions No. 2, 4, 9, and 10, and suggested new conditions, as summarized below, with staff response (indented) directly following.

Appeal Issue No. 2 – Condition No. 2
The Appellant requests that the CUP be re-reviewed after two citations are received within one Cal Poly academic semester, an approximately 15-16 week timeframe (as opposed to existing condition threshold of three violations of law or permit condition within any twelve-month period). The Appellant states that this threshold is stricter than the existing threshold and would provide for quicker response times from the City without letting violations accrue over a year’s time. They argue that this change would better align with and provide more accountability for student organizations.

Staff Response to Appeal Issue No. 2 – Condition No. 2
While modifying Condition No. 2 to trigger a re-review after two citations are received within one Cal Poly academic semester may be beneficial to both the fraternity and the City, it could lead to increased Staff time and resources relating to the frequency of required re-reviews. Additionally, as proposed, this does not account for ongoing violations accruing over time. Though the organization operates under the Cal Poly academic calendar, year-round residents in the neighborhood may experience adverse effects of the organization overtime, regardless of organizational executive board or resident turnover. The current condition, which considers violations of law or permit conditions on a rolling, 12- month basis, provides more accountability because it requires coordination between organizational executive board and residents as they change throughout the school year and year after year. The actions of a specific year’s tenants, executive board, or active members could affect the organization in the long term,

Item 6a
thus the 12-month rolling timeframe promotes good behavior within the organization and accountability to their fellow members to ensure longevity of the organization. Moreover, the Appellant’s actions thus far would be in violation of their proposed modified condition, as they received two citations in April 2025 within the same academic quarter3.

If the Council is interested in modifying the condition, staff recommends combining the two thresholds, such that a re-review would be required if two citations are received in any one Cal Poly academic semester or if three citations are received within any 12-month period to better align with the organization’s operational calendar and to provide accountability in the short- and long-term.

Appeal Issue No. 2 – Conditions No. 4 and 10
The Appellant contends that Conditions No. 4 and 10, relating to the maximum gathering capacity for events and the requirements for special event permitting for events that will surpass this maximum, create practical challenges for the organization. They state that the number of attendees at an event does not truly reflect whether an activity is disruptive.

The Appellant notes that given the size of the organization, events such as chapter meetings, small philanthropic activities, or cultural or religious gatherings may exceed this number even when they are structured, supervised, and do not disturb the neighborhood.

The Appellant suggests that a better approach would be to evaluate activities based on their impacts, including noise levels, safety, and nuisance factors. The Appellant requests clearer guidelines and a flexible approach to the special event permitting process. They also note that the fees and process for special event permitting can be burdensome for college students and create practical challenges for student organizations to comply with.

Staff Response to Appeal Issue No. 2 – Conditions No. 4 and 10 The Appellant has requested modifications to Conditions No. 4 and 10, regarding maximum capacity for regular gatherings or events and the requirement and process for special event permitting for events that will surpass this maximum limit.

Regarding Condition No. 4, the method used to calculate maximum capacity for routine meetings and gatherings is 1.5 times the average population density (25 maximum individuals for this site). This calculation uses the residential population assumptions set forth in the General Plan Land Use Element based on the land use designation and zone and the site/lot area and constraints. This method is also consistent with current practices used in recent fraternity and sorority use permit approvals. The requirement of a special event permit for events including more than the calculated maximum allows staff to evaluate the activities’ expected impacts and to ensure that such activities are compatible with their surroundings and the intent of the Zoning regulations.

3 While quarters are 10-week periods, the April citations would also fall within the same semester based on Cal Poly’s 2026-2027 academic calendar. Cal Poly will switch from quarters to semesters beginning in the 2026-2027 academic year, which starts in August 2026.

Item 6a
Current standard CUP conditions for fraternities and sororities provide two avenues to permit special events that include more individuals than the maximum gathering limit. A fraternity could apply for a temporary and/or intermittent use permit (SLOMC §17.113), which is a Director level review. Temporary use permits are the appropriate avenue to permit a singular event, while intermittent use permits are more suited to recurring or regularly scheduled events of similar nature (for example, a regularly held chapter meeting). A fraternity also could apply to modify their CUP to include all anticipated events throughout the year that would surpass the gathering capacity as part of their project description. Both options offer the ability to permit recurring events, such as weekly meetings or annual events, and provide the review authority with the ability to review those events for compatibility with the neighborhood and compliance with the intent of Zoning Regulations and other applicable regulatory documents. However, in no case will events permitted under either avenue be allowed to violate the Noise Ordinance.

The request by the Appellant to allow flexibility in the special event permitting process outside of these two avenues is vague and it is unclear how review, processing, implementation, and enforcement might be accomplished. Staff does not recommend adopting these proposed amendments because they are inconsistent with Zoning Regulation’s Processes and Procedures, the Land Use Element, and site considerations and constraints.

Furthermore, as noted above, the Appellant has expressed concern with the current fees for a temporary or intermittent use permit or amendment of the Conditional Use Permit4. Fees for either of these options are provided in the Comprehensive Fee Schedule, and can only be amended through a fee schedule update. Additionally, permitting recurring events or a year’s worth of activities under one of the above-mentioned permit avenues would minimize the fees associated with obtaining a temporary use permit for each individual event that will exceed 25 people.

Appeal Issue No. 2 – Condition No. 9
Condition No. 9 states that the fraternity shall comply with SLOMC §9.12.060 (Exterior Noise Limits) between the extended hours of 10 PM and 9 AM. The Appellant requests that noise be measured using objective decibel levels at the property line.

Staff Response to Appeal Issue No. 2 – Condition No. 9
Noise is regulated by SLOMC Chapter 9.12 Noise Control (commonly referred to as the Noise Ordinance). SLOMC §9.12.050 prohibits noise disturbances in such a manner as to be plainly audible at a distance of fifty feet from the noisemaker; the use or operation of loudspeakers or similar devices between the hours of 10 PM and 7 AM such that the sound creates a noise disturbance across a residential

4 An application for a temporary or intermittent use permit requires a fee of $3,051.99 (Director's Actions application fee). An application for a modification of an existing CUP requires a fee of $2,815.14 (25% of a CUP filing fee: $11,260.55).

Item 6a
real property line; and noise that at any time violates the provisions of §9.12.060.

Table 2 below provides the exterior noise limits set forth in §9.12.060 for adjacent zones to 280 California Boulevard. As noise is objectively regulated under the Noise Ordinance, Staff does not recommend modifying Condition No. 9.

Modification to the condition would result in a requirement to implement the noise regulation standards for this property differently than the entirety of the City, which would be very difficult to implement, and could contradict the existing noise regulations.

Table 2. Maximum Permissible Sound Levels at Receiving Land Use Maximum Noise Level (dBA)* for
Cumulative Period
Adjacent Zones Time Window 30+
Minutes
15+
Minutes
5+
Minutes
1+
Minutes
Any Period
of Time
R-1, R-2, & R-4
10:00 PM – 7:00 AM 50 55 60 65 70
7:00 AM – 10:00 PM 55 60 65 70 75
C-N
10:00 PM – 7:00 AM 60 65 70 75 80
7:00 AM – 10:00 PM 65 70 75 80 85
*Maximum noise level (dBA) may be increased in instances where the prevailing ambient noise differs from that permissible (see Sections 9.12.060(A)(3) - (A)(5)).

Appeal Issue No. 2 – New Conditions
The Appellant suggests that for gatherings below the current special event threshold, a formalized event notification and coordination protocol with the Police Department would be useful. Additionally, they request to add a condition for a mandatory annual compliance meeting with Code Enforcement and City staff for all chapter leadership.

Staff Response to Appeal Issue No. 2 – New Conditions
The intent of a request for a condition for a formalized event notification and coordination protocol with the Police Department for gatherings with 25 people or fewer is vague given that such events are currently allowed and no exceptions to the Noise Ordinance have been granted under the CUP. Requiring further coordination with the Police Department would require additional Staff time and resources. It is unclear how the review, processing, implementation, and enforcement of such a program would be accomplished.

Regarding the request for a mandatory annual compliance meeting with Code Enforcement and City staff for all chapter leadership, Code Enforcement already has established communications with fraternity and sorority organizations. Since 2024, Code Enforcement annually participates in the Greek Leadership Institute, a retreat hosted by Cal Poly’s Fraternity & Sorority Life office, where all chapter presidents and council officers are required to attend. At this event, Code Enforcement provides information about zoning regulations and how fraternity use is defined and regulated. Additionally, Code Enforcement participates in the Fire Department’s annual inspections of fraternity and sorority houses for substandard living conditions and provides information regarding applicable zoning regulations and any active CUP requirements.

Item 6a
The request for a condition for a mandatory annual compliance meeting regarding CUP requirements and ongoing compliance appears redundant to actions that are already taken, and it is not clear how this condition would address the neighborhood conflicts that arise from fraternity operations. It is an applicant’s responsibility to understand and uphold the requirements of their CUP. The organization should conduct annual, internal meetings for review of the CUP and their ongoing compliance as a regular best practice so that the fraternity does not receive any citations. The fraternity may always reach out to City staff with specific questions as issues arise, and staff is always open to meeting with members of the community and permit holders.

City Council Consideration
Per SLOMC §17.126.040(B), decisions of the Planning Commission shall be appealed to City Council. Alpha Epsilon Pi filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke CUP USE-0625-2024 resulting in this review (Application No. APPL-0174-2026) being brought before City Council.

Actions on appeals are “de novo” review per SLOMC §17.126.050(A). De novo review means that the City Council must exercise its independent judgment to determine if the Applicant/Appellant’s Conditional Use Permit should be modified, revoked, or remain in effect as it was prior to the Planning Commission’s action to revoke the permit. The City Council is not bound by the Planning Commission’s findings or conclusions.

The decision made by City Council shall be made based on the required findings in SLOMC §17.110.070 and listed above under the “Planning Commission Action” section of this report. Because this is a “de novo” hearing, the City Council can take any of the actions outlined in the alternatives section below other than staff’s recommendation.

Public Engagement
The project has been noticed in compliance with the City’s notification requirements for each public hearing associated with the project. Newspaper legal advertisements were posted in the New Times ten (10) days prior to the Planning Commission and City Council hearings. Additionally, postcards were sent to both owners and occupants of properties, located within 300 feet of the project site, ten (10) days prior to each hearing.

CONCURRENCE
The Council Agenda Report was reviewed by the Planning Division, and the City Attorney’s Office for concurrence.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project is exempt from environmental review under Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit may have a

Item 6a
significant effect on the environment. Additionally, CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15270.).

FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: N/A Budget Year: 2025-26
Funding Identified: No
Fiscal Analysis:

Funding
Sources
Total Budget
Available
Current
Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing
Cost
General Fund $ N/A $0 $0 $0
State
Federal
Fees
Other:

Total $ N/A $0 $0 $0
Consideration by the City Council of an appeal of a decision made by the Planning Commission does not directly result in expenditure of funds and thus has no fiscal impact to the City. The appeal fee, which covers a portion of the staff time required to bring this item forward, per City policy, was paid by the Appellant, and there is no upfront cost resulting from the revocation of the Use Permit. If Council adopts the Resolution to deny the appeal, subsequent review of a new use permit application, should the Appellant reapply, would be subject to the appropriate permitting application fee, which is paid by the applicant.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Continue review of the appeal. The City Council may continue the review of the appeal with direction to staff regarding additional information or analysis required to make a decision. Under this alternative, the hearing would be continued to a date certain or continued off-calendar and then re-noticed as a new hearing in the future.

2. Grant the appeal and modify the Conditional Use Permit. The City Council may uphold the appeal and modify the findings and/ or conditions of approval based on consistency with the General Plan, Zoning Regulations, or other policy documents.

Under this alternative, a revised Resolution would need to be prepared to provide findings to uphold the appeal and allow the Use Permit to continue, as well as adopt any revised conditions of approval.

3. Grant the appeal and retain the existing Conditional Use Permit as is. The City Council may uphold the appeal and retain the Conditional Use Permit as is. This draft Resolution is included as Attachment H.

Item 6a

ATTACHMENTS
A - Draft Resolution denying the appeal and upholding the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for a fraternity at 280 California Boulevard (MOD-0036-2026, APPL-0174-2026)
B - Appeal Submittal from Appellant (APPL-0174-2026, MOD-0036-2026) C - Agenda Correspondence from the March 11, 2026 Planning Commission Hearing D - Resolution No. 5189 [1983 Series] approving original Use Permit, U1099 E - Resolution No. PC-1092-2024 (USE-0625-2024) approving modifications to Conditional Use Permit to allow continuation of the fraternity at 280 California Boulevard
F - Notice to Correct Code Violation(s) for 280 California, Dated 7-15-2025 G -Event Registration with Cal Poly FSL Office at 280 California Blvd from 11-12-2024 to 4-10-2026
H - Draft Resolution upholding the appeal and continuing the existing Conditional Use Permit for a fraternity at 280 California Boulevard (MOD-0036-2026, APPL-0174- 2026).

R ______
RESOLUTION NO. _____ (2026 SERIES)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS

OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DECISION TO REVOKE THE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY LOCATED AT 280
CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTION 15061(B)(3) (COMMON
SENSE EXEMPTION) AND UNDER SECTION 15270 (PROJECTS

WHICH A PUBLIC AGENCY REJECTS OR DISAPPROVES) OF THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES

AS REPRESENTED IN THE COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT AND
ATTACHMENTS DATED MAY 19, 2026 (MOD-0036-2026, APPL-0174- 2026).

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo denied the appeal and upheld the Planning Commission’s approval of the Use Permit, U1099, on August 2, 1983, after duly considering all evidence, including testimony of the applicant and general public and evaluation, and recommendations by staff presented at said hearing; and WHEREAS, the City received complaints and issued citations for multiple, verified noise violations in 2023 and 2024; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, on November 13, 2024, for a re-review of the existing Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under USE-0625-2024; Alpha Epsilon Pi, applicant; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo approved modifications to the Conditional Use Permit, USE-0625-2024, to allow the continuation of the fraternity at 280 California Boulevard, after duly considering all evidence, including the documented noise violations, testimony of the applicant and general public, and evaluation and recommendations by staff presented at said hearing; and WHEREAS, the City received complaints, and, between November 2024 and February 2026, the Police Department issued three citations, relating to noise violations at the property, including at least three citations within a 12-month period within these dates; and
WHEREAS, Code Enforcement issued a Notice of Violation on July 15, 2025, relating to the multiple, verified violations of the existing Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, on March 11, 2026, for the re-review of an existing Conditional Use Permit, USE-0625-2024 (“Conditional

Resolution No. _____ (2026 Series) Page 2
R ______
Use Permit”), for fraternity use at 280 California Boulevard, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under MOD-0036-2026; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo voted 7-0 to revoke Conditional Use Permit USE-0625-2024, after duly considering all evidence, including testimony of the applicant and general public and evaluation and recommendations by staff presented at said hearing; and WHEREAS, Joshua Pinsky, on behalf of Alpha Epsilon Pi, Sigma Omega Chapter, filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke the Conditional Use Permit, APPL-0175-2026, on March 23, 2026; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, on May 19, 2026, for the purpose of considering an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke the Conditional Use Permit, APPL-0174-2025, and has duly considered all evidence, including the record of the Planning Commission hearing; testimony of the applicant, appellant, and general public; and evaluation and recommendations by staff presented at said hearing; and
WHEREAS, notices of said public hearings were made at the time and in the manner required by law.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:

SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council hereby denies the appeal and revokes the Conditional Use Permit, USE-0625-2024, based on the following findings:
a) The current use is not consistent with both Conditional Use Permit regulations of Municipal Code Section 17.110.070(A) and Fraternity regulations of Municipal Code Section 17.86.130 because:
i) The fraternity has been repeatedly cited for violations of the City’s Noise Ordinance.
ii) Since April 2025, the Police have issued three citations for noise violations at the property.
iii) Code Enforcement issued a Notice of Violation of the Conditional Use Permit on July 15, 2025, which provided warning that a third citation before April 16, 2026, would result in a re-review by the Planning Commission. Thereafter, the property received another noise citation in October 2025.
iv) The fraternity organization appealed all three citations. One citation appeal was dismissed due to the appeal being filed after 10 calendar days from citation issuance. The other two citations went to an

Resolution No. _____ (2026 Series) Page 3
R ______
Administrative Citation Appeal Hearing and both citations were upheld by the Hearing Officer
v) The maximum number of people on site at each cited incident exceeded the limit established by the Conditional Use Permit (25 people), as noted by the Police Officers that issued citations for a noise violation on April 16, 2025, April 18, 2025, and October 29, 2025. vi) The fraternity has failed to apply for special event permits or parking and transportation plans as required by their Conditional Use Permit, despite hosting events that exceeded the routine gathering capacity limits of the Permit.
vii) Conduct of the fraternity has been detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood.
b) For the reasons stated above, the design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the current use is not compatible with residential uses in the vicinity. The City Council was not satisfied that any set of conditions would secure these purposes. Therefore, the required finding in Municipal Code Section 17.110.070(A)(3) cannot be made.
c) For the reasons stated above, the continued use of the property as a fraternity under the Conditional Use Permit is not appropriate for the subject location, is incompatible with the neighborhood, and will be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of persons living or working at the site or in the vicinity. The City Council found that no set of conditions would adequately secure these purposes. Therefore, the required finding in Municipal Code Section

17.110.070(A)(5) and Section 17.86.130(B)(1), cannot be made.

SECTION 2. Environmental Review. The project is exempt from environmental review under Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit may have a significant effect on the environment. Additionally, CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or disapproves (CEQA Guidelines Section 15270.)

Resolution No. _____ (2026 Series) Page 4
R ______
SECTION 3. Action. The City Council hereby denies the appeal and REVOKES the Conditional Use Permit, USE-0625-2024, previously issued to 280 California Boulevard for use as a fraternity, based on the Findings stated above. Use as a fraternity shall cease immediately upon execution of this Resolution. Any subsequent application to establish a subsequent Conditional Use Permit for a fraternity at the location shall be subject to all requirements of the Municipal Code, including but not limited to Section

17.86.130 and Chapter 17.110.

Upon motion of Council Member ___________, seconded by Council Member ___________, and on the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

The foregoing resolution was adopted this 19th day of May 2026. ___________________________
Mayor Erica A. Stewart
ATTEST:
______________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________. ___________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk

Date Received Filing Fee
D ApplicanUNon-Applicant: $2,583.46
For Office Use Received by: __

APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL
SECTION 1. APPELLANT INFORMATION
Joshua Pinsky 280 California Blvd, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 Name Mailing Address and Zip Code
Representative's Name Mailing Address and Zip Code
Title Phone Email
SECTION 2. SUBJECT OF APPEAL

1. In accordance with the procedures set forth in Title 1, Chapter 1.20 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code or Title 17, Chapter 17 .126 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code, I hereby appeal the decision of the:

Planning Commision
(Name of Officer, Committee or Commission decision being appealed)

2. The date the decision being appealed was rendered: _0_3/_1_ 1_/_2_0_2_6 _______ _

3. The application or project was entitled: _M_O_D_-_0_0_3_6_-_20__2_6 _________ _

4. I discussed the matter with the following City staff member:
---------------------
Mallory Patino on 03/1 3/2026
(St a ff Member's Name and Department) (Date)

5. Has this matter been the subject of a previous appeal? If so, when was it heard and by whom:

SECTION 3. REASON FOR APPEAL
Explain specifically what action/s you are appealing and why vou believe the Council should consider your appeal. Include what evidence you have that supports your appeal. You may attach additional pages, if necessary. This form continues on the other side.

Revised and Published 10/01/24 Page 1 of2
11 President of the Sigma Omega Chapter of Alpha Epsilon Pi

Revised and Published 10/01/24 Page 2 of 2
cc: City Attorney
City Manager
Department Head
Advisory Body Chairperson
Advisory Body Liaison
City Clerk (original)
SECTION 4. APPELLANT’S RESPONSIBILITY
The San Luis Obispo City Council values public participation in local government and encourages all forms of citizen involvement. However, due to real costs associated with City Council consideration of an appeal, including public notification, all appeals pertaining to a planning application or project are subject to the following filing fee, which must accompany the appeal form: $2,583.46.

Your right to exercise an appeal comes with certain responsibilities. If you file an appeal, please understand that it must be heard within 45 days from filing this form, except for matters arising under Title 17 (Zoning Regulations) of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code shall be governed by those Chapters. You will be notified in writing of the exact date your appeal will be heard before the Council. You or your representative will be expected to attend the public hearing, and to be prepared to make your case. Your testimony is limited to 10 minutes.

A continuance may be granted under certain and unusual circumstances. If you feel you need to request a continuance, you must submit your request in writing to the City Clerk. Please be advised that if your request for continuance is received after the appeal is noticed to the public, the Council may not be able to grant the request for continuance. Submitting a request for continuance does not guarantee that it will be granted; that action is at the discretion of the City Council.

I hereby agree to appear and/or send a representative to appear on my behalf when said appeal is scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council. __________________________________________________________________________ (Signature of Appellant) (Date)
Reason for Appeal continued
Submitted in a Google Doc
Joshua Pinsky 03/23/2026

Good afternoon members of the City Council,
My name is Joshua Pinsky, and I am the President of the Sigma Omega Chapter of Alpha Epsilon Pi, located at 280 California Boulevard. We are appealing the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke our Conditional Use Permit.

We disagree with the commission's conclusion that no set of conditions could ensure compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood or protect public health, safety, and welfare.

We believe the full record does not back this conclusion, is inconsistent with the clear improvements our chapter has made, and overlooks practical changes that would help us comply.

We acknowledge that there were three violations and that occupancy limits were exceeded.

However, these incidents do not tell the whole story. When we look at the broader context, ● 13 citations in the previous academic year
● 2 citations in the following academic year (both in April) ● 1 citation in the current academic year (October)
This shows a roughly 85% decrease in violations over two years. Importantly, this improvement happened despite significant turnover in our membership. This suggests that the changes we made are structural and organizational, rather than dependent on individual members. This trend illustrates a long-term and noticeable commitment to compliance that was not adequately considered in the Commission’s decision.

Furthermore, while the City measures compliance on a calendar-year basis, we operate under Cal Poly’s academic calendar. The two April citations and the October citation pertain to different academic years, so only one violation has occurred during the current year. Although the 12-month framework is technically correct, it obscures a more accurate view of our behavioral improvement, which we believe deserves attention.

The main issue in our appeal is the Commission’s finding under §17.110.070(A)(5), which states that continued use of the property would harm the health, safety, and welfare of the nearby community. We challenge this finding on three grounds.

First, the property is in an R4 high-density residential area, which is the right setting for this use.

This zoning is intended to support student housing and higher-intensity residential uses.

Revoking the permit and spreading similar activities into lower-density R1 or R2 neighborhoods could impact the city more broadly, rather than concentrating activity in an area designed for it.

Second, our chapter has shown measurable improvement year after year under current conditions by actively engaging with neighbors and working collaboratively with Code Enforcement, the Residents for Quality Neighborhoods (RQN) group, and City staff. Our members undergo

numerous safety trainings, and we submitted proposed condition modifications in writing before the hearing. While the Commission ultimately dismissed these efforts, the decision does not explain why revised conditions would not work. This lack of reasoning is central to our appeal.

Third, feedback from nearby residents does not support claims of ongoing harm. Of 14 residents surveyed within about 200 feet of our property, 12 reported no disturbances linked to the fraternity. The other two noted occasional noise but could not pinpoint 280 California as the source. This direct input from the community contradicts the Commission’s conclusion regarding impacts on nearby residents.

The Commission’s finding under §17.110.070(A)(3) about compatibility with the neighborhood stems from the same concerns. Given the zoning and our progress, it can work with the right conditions.

To that end, we are not just asking for the permit to be reinstated as is. We propose a clear set of modified conditions that provide an enforceable path forward, including:
● A mandatory annual compliance meeting with Code Enforcement and City staff for all chapter leadership
● A formalized event notification and coordination protocol with the Police Department for gatherings below the current special event threshold
● Continued proactive engagement with neighboring residents to ensure open communication and responsiveness
We also want to note that while we understand the City’s processes, the fees associated with them can be particularly burdensome for college students. We recognize this may not be within the Commission’s control. Still, we feel it’s important to highlight the practical challenges and to emphasize our ongoing good-faith efforts to engage constructively despite these obstacles.

During the Planning Commission hearing, especially during the discussion, the Commission acknowledged the complexity of this issue. They recognized the broader structural challenges related to enforcement, student housing, and the relevance of existing conditions. If members of the Commission expressed uncertainty or acknowledged possible paths forward short of revocation, we believe these considerations further support that modified conditions, rather than complete revocation, are the more appropriate response.

Ultimately, the question before the City Council is not whether violations occurred, but whether our chapter has shown the ability and willingness to comply in the future, and if revocation is a fair response given our current progress. The evidence shows significant improvement, meaningful engagement, and a clear path to full compliance under modified conditions.

For these reasons, we respectfully ask that the City Council grant this appeal, set aside the revocation, and allow the implementation of revised conditions that support accountability and long-term compliance.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best,
Joshua Pinsky

Dear Members of the Planning Commission,
As we prepare for the upcoming review of our Conditional Use Permit, our chapter has taken time to evaluate the current conditions that govern our property and how they work in practice.

We aim to provide recommendations that clarify what is expected of our chapter while protecting the surrounding neighborhood.The recommendations below aim to improve the clarity and practicality of several existing conditions while ensuring accountability for our organization.

Condition #4
The current condition that limits routine meetings and gatherings to twenty-five people creates practical challenges for us. Our organization has many members, and even standard internal meetings can involve more than 25 people. For instance, events like chapter meetings, small philanthropic activities, or cultural gatherings may exceed this number even when they are structured, supervised, and do not disturb the neighborhood. As a Jewish fraternity, we host occasional religious events like Havdalah gatherings with Hillel or Passover Seders, where students meet to observe traditions and share a meal. These events are typically quiet and organized, but they may involve more than twenty-five participants. Because of this, a strict numerical limit does not truly reflect whether an activity is disruptive. A better approach would be to evaluate activities based on their actual impacts, including noise levels, safety, and nuisance factors, instead of relying solely on a fixed attendance number.

Condition # 9
Another recommendation involves how we evaluate noise concerns. Right now, noise enforcement often depends on personal opinion. We suggest requiring that noise be measured using objective decibel levels at the property line. This would provide a clearer and more consistent standard for both residents and our chapter. Using measurable noise levels would ensure that concerns are assessed based on clear criteria and documented evidence, not just personal perception.

Condition # 2
The current condition triggers a Conditional Use Permit review if three citations occur within a twelve- month period. We recommend changing this standard to evaluate citations within an academic semester instead. Beginning in Fall 2026, Cal Poly will move from the quarter system to a semester system. Since our chapter ’s activities align closely with the university’s academic calendar, matching the citation review period with academic semesters would create a clearer and more relevant framework for accountability. Under this new approach, we could trigger a review after two citations within a single academic semester. This would actually be a stricter standard than the current one, as it shortens the time frame for evaluating citations. Rather than letting

violations build up over an entire year, the City would be able to review conduct more quickly during the period when student organizations are actively involved. Aligning the citation review process with the academic calendar would also make it easier for both the City and our chapter to track and understand, while still maintaining strong accountability for our organization.

Condition #10
Finally, the process for handling events that exceed the attendance limit can be complicated.

Currently, it requires submitting a special event request and transportation management plan up to ninety days in advance. In many cases, student organizations confirm event dates much closer to the actual dates. For example, recruitment events or philanthropic activities are often scheduled just weeks in advance, making it hard to meet the ninety- day submission requirement.

Providing clearer guidelines or more flexible processes for these events could help ensure they are carried out responsibly while still allowing the City to monitor potential impacts. Our purpose in sharing these recommendations is not to evade responsibility or oversight. We hope to constructively contribute to a framework that allows our chapter to operate responsibly while remaining compatible with the surrounding neighborhood.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

)
)
RESOLUTION NO. 5189 (1983 SERI.ES)
A RK::;SOLUTION OP 'J.'HE COUNCIL OF THE Cl.TY OF SAN WIS OUISPO DEl.'fl;r.NG AN APPKAL foJS:D UPHOL.OHITG A Pf4Ad1NING COMMISSION ACTION TO .il..P�'ROVE URE PERMIT REQUEST ALLOWING A F'RA'I:BRNIT.t HOUSi::

ALPnA EPSILON l?l AT WO CAJ..,IFO!RNIA &(li!H,iZi!ARn

ATTACHMENT B

ATTACHMENT B

ATTACHMENT B

RESOLUTION NO. PC-1092-24

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

SAN LUIS OBISPO APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO AN EXISTING

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONTINUATION OF THE FRATERNITY AT 280 CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD. THE PROJECT IS
EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTION 15301
(EXISTING FACILITIES) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES AS REPRESENTED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS DATED NOVEMBER 13, 2024 (USE0625-2024) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, on August 2, 1983, to review an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of a Use Permit to allow a fraternity at 280 California Boulevard, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under U1099; Alpha Epsilon Pi, applicant; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo denied the appeal and upheld the Planning Commission’s approval of the Use Permit, U1099, on August 2, 1983, after duly considering all evidence, including testimony of the applicant and general public and evaluation, and recommendations by staff presented at said hearing; and WHEREAS, the City received complaints and issued citations for multiple, verified noise violations in 2023 and 2024; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, on November 13, 2024, for a re-review of the existing Conditional Use Permit to allow the continuation of the fraternity at 280 California Boulevard, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under USE0625-2024; Alpha Epsilon Pi, applicant; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo approved modifications to the Conditional Use Permit, USE-0625-2024, after duly considering all evidence, including the documented noise violations, testimony of the applicant and general public, and evaluation and recommendations by staff presented at said hearing; and
WHEREAS, notices of said public hearings were made at the time and in the manner required by law; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:

Resolution No. PC-1092-24 Page 2
280 California Blvd., USE-0625-2024
SECTION 1. Findings. The Planning Commission hereby approves modifications to the Conditional Use Permit to allow the continuation of the fraternity (USE-0625-2024), based on the following revised findings:

Conditional Use Permit / Fraternity Use

1. The project is consistent with the General Plan because the proposed fraternity is an allowable use as dense group housing in the High Density Residential (HDR) land use designation. In addition, the project would facilitate Land Use Element Policy 2.6.5 and Housing Element Policy 8.6 by locating a fraternity in proximity to the Cal Poly SLO campus and other student-oriented uses and housing.

2. The proposed fraternity is conditionally allowed within the High-Density Residential (R-4) zone. As conditioned, the project complies with applicable provisions of the Zoning Regulations because (a) the maximum number of 19 residents complies with the group housing maximum occupancy limits and (b) the revised parking configuration would provide 19 required spaces for 19 residents and comply with the City’s Parking and Driveway Standards to improve the property.

3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the project will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity because the proposed fraternity would (a) be established in proximity to other dense group housing (i.e., other fraternities, sororities, multi-family, etc.), (b) located within walking distance (i.e., within 0.3-mile) of the Cal Poly campus, and (c) utilize an existing developed property with minor site improvements (i.e., parking and landscaping improvements).

4. The site is physically suitable in terms of (a) its design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics of the project; (b) traffic generation and the provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access; (c) public protection services (e.g., fire protection, police protection, etc.); and (d) the provision of utilities (e.g., potable water, schools, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.). The project is surrounded by other developed properties with compatible dense housing uses, has access to the City’s circulation system, and would be served by City utilities.

The project utilizes an existing developed property and does not include activities that would generate service or utility demands beyond those anticipated with uses permitted in the vicinity.

5. As conditioned, the project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of persons living or working at the site or in the vicinity because conditions have been included that place limits on the number of persons allowed on site, restrict activities, provide adequate parking, and limit potential disturbances to neighboring properties. The project will be compatible with the existing site constraints and the character of the neighborhood.

Resolution No. PC-1092-24 Page 3
280 California Blvd., USE-0625-2024

6. As conditioned, the establishment and subsequent operation or conduct of the project will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use because the project includes conditions that (a) place limits on the number of persons allowed on site, (b) restrict activities, (c) provide adequate parking, and (d) limit potential disturbances to neighboring properties. The project would be compatible with the existing site constraints and the character of the neighborhood.

SECTION 2. Environmental Review. The project is exempt from environmental review under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines because it includes the continued operation and permitting of an existing residential use (i.e., fraternity) with revised findings and conditions of approval. The project does not include construction of a new building or additional building square footage. Therefore, the project involves no expansion of the existing residential use.

SECTION 3. Action. The Planning Commission hereby approves modifications to the Conditional Use Permit to allow the continuation of the fraternity (USE-0625-2024), based on the following revised conditions:

Planning Division – Community Development Department

1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director for compliance with the conditions of approval, or to determine whether a modification of the Conditional Use Permit is necessary upon significant change to the project as represented in the Staff Report dated November 13, 2024, or in the event of a change in ownership which may result in deviation from the project description or approved plans.

2. The Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission as soon as practical if: 1) conduct on the permitted premises results in three (3) citations within any 12-month period for a violation of law or permit condition, 2) that citation is not contested or is upheld on appeal, and 3) the conduct for which the citation was issued resulted in adverse impacts to, or complaints from, residents or occupants of the surrounding neighborhood. At the time of the Conditional Use Permit review, to ensure ongoing compatibility with nearby uses, the conditions of approval may be added, modified, and/or removed, or the Conditional Use Permit may be revoked. The City shall notify Cal Poly if the Use Permit is revoked. A re-review by the Planning Commission shall be accompanied by the appropriate fee.

3. The fraternity shall be limited to a maximum of 19 residents for the property. The property owner shall allow the City to verify the maximum occupancy by allowing an inspection of records or visual inspection of the premises. Any inspection shall be scheduled at a reasonable time with at least 24-hour notice to the residents.

Resolution No. PC-1092-24 Page 4
280 California Blvd., USE-0625-2024

4. Routine meetings and gatherings for the fraternity shall be limited to a maximum of 25 people (rounded up from 24.75 = 16.5 people x 1.5), except as otherwise approved by the Community Development Director for special events. If the fraternity hosts special events involving more than 25 people, a transportation management plan to reduce impacts to the surrounding neighborhood shall be submitted to the Community Development Department, at least 30 days prior to the event taking place, for review and approval. No exception from the Noise Ordinance shall be approved by the Director as part of the special event.

5. For the life of the organization, the fraternity shall remain affiliated and in good standing with the Interfraternity Council of Student Life and Leadership at California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo. If the fraternity becomes unaffiliated or is no longer in good standing, the Conditional Use Permit shall be revoked.

6. For the life of the organization, the fraternity shall provide the name and contact information (i.e., phone number and email address) of all responsible parties to the Community Development Department and Neighborhood Services Manager of the Police Department on an annual basis. If there is a change to the name and/or contact information of any responsible parties, the Community Development Department and Neighborhood Services Manager shall be notified immediately.

7. For the life of the organization, the property shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner. All landscaping shall be replaced as necessary and maintained (e.g., trimmed, pruned, etc.) to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.

8. A minimum of 19 parking spaces shall be provided and maintained at all times.

These spaces shall remain available to residents of the fraternity and not designated for any individuals not residing on the property.

9. The fraternity use shall comply with Table 1 (Exterior Noise Limits) of Section

9.12.060 (Exterior Noise Limits) between the extended hours of 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m.

10.Prior to a special event approved by the Community Development Director pursuant to Condition No. 4, the fraternity shall provide written notification of the event to occupants within 300 feet of the site. The written notification shall include the date, hours, and contact information for the responsible party for the special event. No exception from the Noise Ordinance shall be approved by the Director as part of the special event.

11.Live entertainment, bands, and/or amplified sounds are prohibited, unless otherwise approved through a special event by the Community Development Department. No exception from the Noise Ordinance shall be approved by the

Resolution No. PC-1092-24 Page 5
280 California Blvd., USE-0625-2024
Director as part of the special event.

12.Failure to comply with any of the above conditions or code requirements, or the conduct of the use so as to constitute a violation of Federal, State, or local law, or so as to constitute a public nuisance or so as to cause adverse impacts on the health, safety, or welfare of persons in the vicinity of this use is prohibited and may constitute grounds for the revocation of this permit.

13.Within 60 days of the re-review hearing with the Planning Commission on November 13, 2024, the fraternity shall install a minimum of 19 bicycle spaces (one space for each resident) and contact the City for a follow-up inspection to verify that all required bicycle spaces have been installed.

Indemnification

14.The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and/or its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City and/or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul, the approval by the City of this project, and all actions relating thereto, including but not limited to environmental review (“Indemnified Claims”). The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Indemnified Claim upon being presented with the Indemnified Claim and the City shall fully cooperate in the defense against an Indemnified Claim.

On motion by Commissioner Juan Munoz-Morris, seconded by Commissioner Bob Jorgensen, and on the following roll call vote:

AYES: Commissioners Bob Jorgensen, Steve Kahn, and Juan MunozMorris, and Chair Justin Cooley NOES: Commissioner Eric Tolle and Vice Chair Dave Houghton RECUSED: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Sheryl Flores
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 13th day of November 2024. _______ __________
Tyler Corey, Secretary
Planning Commission

Notice of Violation
July 15, 2025
Manda Properties LLC
% Comet Realty
1110 California Blvd #C
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
SUBJECT ADDRESS: 280 California Blvd, San Luis Obispo, CA 93405 APN: 052-072-017 Code Case #: CODE-000074-2024
Dear Property Owner,
City of San Luis Obispo Community Development Department staff noted the following violations of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code or other relevant codes at the above listed address:

1. Use Permit Violation (SLOMC 17.76.060)
“It shall be unlawful and a public nuisance for any person, firm or corporation, owning, leasing, occupying, or having possession of any private property in the City to maintain such property in such a manner that any of the following conditions are found to exist thereon:

I. Any violation of the provisions of a minor use permit, conditional use permit, planned development permit, architectural review approval, variance, or other land use entitlement or land use permit.”
Condition Four (4) of the newly approved use permit (USE-0625-2024 approved November 13, 2024) allowing a fraternity at the subject property indicates “Routine meetings and gatherings for the fraternity shall be limited to a maximum of 25 people, except as otherwise approved by the Community Development Director for special events. If the fraternity hosts special events involving more than 25 people, a transportation management plan to reduce impacts to the surrounding neighborhood shall be submitted to the Community Development Department, at least 30 days prior to the event taking place, for review and approval. No exception from the Noise Ordinance shall be approved by the Director as part of the special event.” Police Department records indicate that two citations regarding violations of the city’s noise regulations were issued after 10:00 p.m. on April 16th and April 18th, 2025. Both incidents were reported as having 100 people or more.

Condition Two (2) of the use permit states that if conduct on the permitted premises results in three (3) citations within any 12-month period for a violation of law or permit condition the Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission as soon as practical. As two citations have already been issued, one more citation before April 16, 2026 will result in a recommendation for review of the use permit.

We request that you voluntarily take immediate action to correct the above noted violation(s). These violations constitute a public nuisance and must be abated. Failure to correct the violation(s) by the

specified date will result in the issuance of an Administrative Citation requiring payment of FINES in accordance with SLOMC Chapter 1.24. For Municipal Code violations that remain uncorrected after issuance of an Administrative Citation, the City may seek enforcement by other civil or criminal remedies.

Any person having a title interest in the property may request a Director’s review of this Notice by completing the enclosed Request for Director’s Review Form and submitting it to the Community Development Department, 919 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA 93406, within five (5) days of the date of this Notice. This Notice shall be deemed final unless you timely file a Request for Director’s Review.

We look forward to working with you to resolve these violations and would like to thank you for your efforts to maintain your property and to help preserve the safety and beauty of our community. If you have questions, please contact the undersigned Officer at (805) 783-7841 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
____________________________
Steve Sheats, Code Enforcement Officer
Cc: File
Enclosures: Request for Directors Review, Use Permit USE-0625-2024

Attachment G – Event Registration with Cal Poly Fraternity and Sorority Life Office at 280 California Blvd from 11-13-2024 to 4-10-2026
Event registration forms submitted by Interfraternity Council organizations to the Cal Poly Fraternity and Sorority Life (FSL) office are self-reported. In 2024, event registration forms did not require an expected attendance count; in 2025, this requirement applied only to events involving alcohol; and in 2026, it applied to all events, therefore, not all records include an expected attendance count. The below table shows the 30 events that were registered at 280 California Boulevard (Alpha Epsilon Pi) between November 13, 2024, to April 10, 2026.

Registration forms are provided following the table.

Reported Date of
Event
Alcohol Present
(Yes/No)
Reported Expected
Attendance
11/16/2024 No -
11/20/2024 No -
11/21/2024 No -
2/1/2025 Yes 65
2/8/2025 Yes 160
2/12/2025 No -
2/13/2025 No -
2/14/2025 Yes 160
2/16/2025 Yes 160
2/19/2025 No -
2/22/2025 Yes 160
4/3/2025 No -
4/18/2025* Yes 160
4/19/2025 Yes 160
5/14/2025 No -
5/15/2025 No -
5/22/2025 No -
5/29/2025 No -
10/9/2025 No -
10/11/2025 Yes 80
10/16/2025 No -
11/6/2025 No -
11/15/2025 Yes 160
1/16/2026 No 100
1/17/2026 No 100
1/18/2026 No 100
2/14/2026 Yes 100
2/21/2026 Yes 100
2/27/2026 No 160
2/28/2026 Yes 100
*Event resulted in Police Department issuance of a citation for a noise violation

FSL Event Registration
- Tue, Nov 12, 2024 6:20 PM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Thu, Nov 14, 2024 1:43 PM
By:

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi Sigma Omega Chapter
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone#:
-
I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME
What is the name and theme of your event?

Christmas theme
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? Christmas attire, holiday t hemed clothes
Will alcohol be present at this event?
No

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
11/16/2024
Start Time of Event:
9:30
End Date of Event:
11/16/2024
End Time of Event:
11:30

LOCATION

Where is your event being held?
Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California blvd

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion
G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
Your Review
G
Your Vote: None
Reviewers

CANCEL POST
• • •

Level 1 Association - Form G
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form
Voting Reviewers

FSL Event Registration
- Mon, Nov 18, 2024 11:08 AM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Tue, Nov 19, 2024 12:11 PM
By:

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi Sigma Omega Chapter
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone#:
-
I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME
What is the name and theme of your event?

Holiday Theme
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? Where anything winter holiday related
Will alcohol be present at this event?
No

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
11/20/2024
Start Time of Event:
8:00
End Date of Event:
11/20/2024
End Time of Event:
9:00

LOCATION

Where is your event being held?
Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California blvd

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion
G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
Your Review
G
Your Vote: None
Reviewers

CANCEL POST
• • •

Level 1 Association - Form G
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form
Voting Reviewers

FSL Event Registration
- Mon, Nov 18, 2024 11:12 AM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Thu, Nov 21, 2024 11:51 AM
By:

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi Sigma Omega Chapter
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone#:
-
I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME
What is the name and theme of your event?

Brat and Frat
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? neon wear or frat wear
Will alcohol be present at this event?
No

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
11/21/2024
Start Time of Event:
8:00
End Date of Event:
11/21/2024
End Time of Event:
9:00

LOCATION

Where is your event being held?
Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California blvd

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion
G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
M Thu, Nov 21, 202411:51 AM
Exchange with GPhi
Reply

CANCEL POST

Reviewers
Your Review
Your Vote: None G  
Level 1 Association - Form
G
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form
Voting Reviewers

FSL Event Registration
- Wed, Jan 22, 2025 5:24 PM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Thu, Jan 30, 2025 8:35 PM
By: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Comment: This event registration is approved. Please make sure to submit your post-event form by next Wednesday at 12pm!

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi Sigma Omega Chapter
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone#:
-
I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME

What is the name and theme of your event?
Rhym without Reason
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? costumes that rhym with other costumes
Will alcohol be present at this event?
Yes

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
2/1/2025
Start Time of Event:
9:00
End Date of Event:
2/1/2025
End Time of Event:
11:59

LOCATION
Where is your event being held?

Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California blvd

GUEST LIST
How many guests are you expecting at your event?
*FSL Event Registration Procedure requires a 2:1 (2 guests per 1 member) ratio at events with alcohol.*
65 SOBER MONITORS

All events where alcohol is present are required to have sober monitors designated and present.

Reminders:
o Chapters must utilize the sober monitor template provided by the FSL office. o All sober monitors must be organization members that are registered through the FSL office.
o Three (3) sober monitors (including one from the executive committee or equivalent) are required at a minimum.

For every 40 guests, invited to the event, an additional sober monitor will be required.

Upload your Sober Monitor list here:
n/a

RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upload your approved Risk Management Plan here:
[:♦- DOWNLOAD Fl~

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion

G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
E Tue, Jan 28, 2025 5:31 PM
Sober Monitor List
(Iii AEPI_-_Sober _Monitor _List_2_1_25_ -_Sheetl.pdf)
Reply
Your Review
G
Your Vote: None
Reviewers
Voting Reviewers
G ~ ( Association - Form)
M
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form

CANCEL POST
• • •

What is the name and theme of your event?
Jewmanji
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? Ju ngle themed clothes
Will alcohol be present at this event?
Yes

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
2/8/2025
Start Time of Event:
9:00
End Date of Event:
2/8/2025
End Time of Event:
11:30

LOCATION
Where is your event being held?

Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California

GUEST LIST
How many guests are you expecting at your event?
*FSL Event Registration Procedure requires a 2:1 (2 guests per 1 member) ratio at events with alcohol.*
160

SOBER MONITORS

All events where alcohol is present are required to have sober monitors designated and present.

Reminders:
o Chapters must utilize the sober monitor template provided by the FSL office. o All sober monitors must be organization members that are registered through the FSL office.
o Three (3) sober monitors (including one from the executive committee or equivalent) are required at a minimum.

For every 40 guests, invited to the event, an additional sober monitor will be required.

Upload your Sober Monitor list here:
n/a

RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upload your approved Risk Management Plan here:
[:♦- DOWNLOAD Fl~

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion

G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
E Thu, Feb 6, 2025 2:13 PM
Updated Sober Monitor list for 2/8/25
(Iii AEPI_-_Sober _Monitor _List_2_8_25_ Updated_ -_Sheetl.pdf) Reply
E Tue, Feb 4, 2025 7:48 PM
Sober Monitors list for 2/8/25
(Iii AEPI_-_Sober _Monitor _List_2_8_25_ -_Sheetl.pdf)
Reply
Your Review
G
Your Vote: None
Reviewers
Voting Reviewers

CANCEL POST
• • •

G Level 1 Association - Form
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form

FSL Event Registration
- Tue, Feb 11, 2025 4:43 PM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Thu, Feb 13, 2025 10:40 AM
By:

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi, Sigma Omega Chapter
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone#:

I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME
What is the name and theme of your event?

KKG Exchange
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? Valentines
Will alcohol be present at this event?
No

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
2/12/2025
Start Time of Event:
8:00
End Date of Event:
2/12/2025
End Time of Event:
9:00

LOCATION

Where is your event being held?
Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion
G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
Your Review
G
Your Vote: None
Reviewers

CANCEL POST
• • •

Level 1 Association - Form G
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form
Voting Reviewers

FSL Event Registration
- Tue, Feb 11, 2025 4:45 PM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Thu, Feb 13, 2025 10:42 AM
By:

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi, Sigma Omega Chapter
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone#:

I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME
What is the name and theme of your event?

AOPII Exchange
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? Valentines, pink clothing or love themed clothes
Will alcohol be present at this event?
No

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
2/13/2025
Start Time of Event:
8:00
End Date of Event:
2/13/2025
End Time of Event:
9:00

LOCATION

Where is your event being held?
Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion
G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
Your Review
G
Your Vote: None
Reviewers

CANCEL POST
• • •

Level 1 Association - Form G
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form
Voting Reviewers

FSL Event Registration
- Tue, Feb 4, 2025 7:52 PM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Thu, Feb 13, 2025 2:21 PM
By: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Comment: This event registration is approved. Don't forget to submit the post-event form by Wednesday at 12pm.

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi, Sigma Omega Chapter
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone#:

I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME

What is the name and theme of your event?
Valentines party
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? Red and pink, valentines themed clothes
Will alcohol be present at this event?
Yes

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
2/14/2025
Start Time of Event:
9:30
End Date of Event:
2/14/2025
End Time of Event:
11:59

LOCATION
Where is your event being held?

Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California

GUEST LIST
How many guests are you expecting at your event?
*FSL Event Registration Procedure requires a 2:1 (2 guests per 1 member) ratio at events with alcohol.*
160

SOBER MONITORS

All events where alcohol is present are required to have sober monitors designated and present.

Reminders:
o Chapters must utilize the sober monitor template provided by the FSL office. o All sober monitors must be organization members that are registered through the FSL office.
o Three (3) sober monitors (including one from the executive committee or equivalent) are required at a minimum.

For every 40 guests, invited to the event, an additional sober monitor will be required.

Upload your Sober Monitor list here:
n/a

RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upload your approved Risk Management Plan here:
[:♦- DOWNLOAD Fl~

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion

G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
E Wed, Feb 12, 2025 4:26 PM
Sober Monitor List for 2/14/25
(Iii AEPI_-_Sober _Monitor_List_2_14_25_-_Sheetl.pdf)
Reply
Your Review
G
Your Vote: None
Reviewers
Voting Reviewers
G ~ ( Association - Form)
M
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form

CANCEL POST
• • •

FSL Event Registration
- Thu, Feb 6, 2025 2:17 PM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Thu, Feb 13, 2025 2:12 PM
By: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Comment: This event registration is approved. Don't forget to submit the post-event form by Wednesday at 12pm.

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi Sigma Omega Chapter
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone#:
-
I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME

What is the name and theme of your event?
Boiler Room DJ
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? Neon colors and black clothes
Will alcohol be present at this event?
Yes

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
2/16/2025
Start Time of Event:
9:00
End Date of Event:
2/16/2025
End Time of Event:
11:59

LOCATION
Where is your event being held?

Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California blvd

GUEST LIST
How many guests are you expecting at your event?
*FSL Event Registration Procedure requires a 2:1 (2 guests per 1 member) ratio at events with alcohol.*
160

SOBER MONITORS

All events where alcohol is present are required to have sober monitors designated and present.

Reminders:
o Chapters must utilize the sober monitor template provided by the FSL office. o All sober monitors must be organization members that are registered through the FSL office.
o Three (3) sober monitors (including one from the executive committee or equivalent) are required at a minimum.

For every 40 guests, invited to the event, an additional sober monitor will be required.

Upload your Sober Monitor list here:
n/a

RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upload your approved Risk Management Plan here:
[:♦- DOWNLOAD Fl~

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion

G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
E Wed, Feb 12, 2025 5:43 PM
Sober Monitor List 2/16/25
(Iii AEPI_-_Sober _Monitor_List_2_16_25_-_Sheetl.pdf)
Reply
Your Review
G
Your Vote: None
Reviewers
Voting Reviewers
G ~ ( Association - Form)
M
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form

CANCEL POST
• • •

FSL Event Registration
- Mon, Feb 17, 2025 9:00 PM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Tue, Feb 18, 2025 11:26 AM
By:

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi, Sigma Omega Chapter
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone#:

I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME
What is the name and theme of your event?

AOPII Exchange
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? Valentines, pink clothing or love themed clothes
Will alcohol be present at this event?
No

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
2/19/2025
Start Time of Event:
8:00
End Date of Event:
2/19/2025
End Time of Event:
9:00

LOCATION

Where is your event being held?
Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion
G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
Your Review
G
Your Vote: None
Reviewers

CANCEL POST
• • •

Level 1 Association - Form G
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form
Voting Reviewers

FSL Event Registration
- Wed, Feb 12, 2025 5:04 PM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Fri, Feb 21, 2025 2:01 PM
By: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Comment: This event registration is accepted. Please don't forget to submit the post-event form by Wednesday at 12pm.

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi, Sigma Omega Chapter
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone#:

I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME

What is the name and theme of your event?
Space Party
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? neon space themed clothes
Will alcohol be present at this event?
Yes

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
2/22/2025
Start Time of Event:
9:30
End Date of Event:
2/22/2025
End Time of Event:
11:59

LOCATION
Where is your event being held?

Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California

GUEST LIST
How many guests are you expecting at your event?
*FSL Event Registration Procedure requires a 2:1 (2 guests per 1 member) ratio at events with alcohol.*
160

SOBER MONITORS

All events where alcohol is present are required to have sober monitors designated and present.

Reminders:
o Chapters must utilize the sober monitor template provided by the FSL office. o All sober monitors must be organization members that are registered through the FSL office.
o Three (3) sober monitors (including one from the executive committee or equivalent) are required at a minimum.

For every 40 guests, invited to the event, an additional sober monitor will be required.

Upload your Sober Monitor list here:
n/a

RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upload your approved Risk Management Plan here:
[:♦- DOWNLOAD Fl~

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion

G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
E Tue, Feb 18, 2025 10:31 PM
Sober Monitor list for 2/22/25
(Iii AEPI_-_Sober _Monitor_List_2_22_25_-_Sheetl.pdf)
Reply
Your Review
G
Your Vote: None
Reviewers
Voting Reviewers
G ~ ( Association - Form)
M
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form

CANCEL POST
• • •

FSL Event Registration
- Wed, Apr 2, 2025 9:40 AM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Thu, Apr 3, 2025 3:34 PM
By:

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi Sigma Omega Chapter
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone#:
-
I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME
What is the name and theme of your event?

Gamma Phi Beta Exchange
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? a mixture of formal and casual attire
Will alcohol be present at this event?
No

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
4/3/2025
Start Time of Event:
8:00
End Date of Event:
4/3/2025
End Time of Event:
9:00

LOCATION

Where is your event being held?
Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California blvd

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion
G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
Your Review
G
Your Vote: None
Reviewers

CANCEL POST
• • •

Level 1 Association - Form G
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form
Voting Reviewers

FSL Event Registration
- Mon, Apr 7, 2025 8:48 PM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Fri, Apr 18, 2025 8:19 AM
By: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Comment: this event registration is accepted. don't forget to submit the post-event form by Wednesday at 12pm. thank you!

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi, Sigma Omega Chapter
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone#:

I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME

What is the name and theme of your event?
Jewphoria
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? Purple and green, colorful, dressed like characters from the show Euphoria Will alcohol be present at this event?
Yes

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
4/18/2025
Start Time of Event:
9:00
End Date of Event:
4/18/2025
End Time of Event:
11:30

LOCATION
Where is your event being held?

Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California

GUEST LIST
How many guests are you expecting at your event?
*FSL Event Registration Procedure requires a 2:1 (2 guests per 1 member) ratio at events with alcohol.*
160

SOBER MONITORS

All events where alcohol is present are required to have sober monitors designated and present.

Reminders:
o Chapters must utilize the sober monitor template provided by the FSL office. o All sober monitors must be organization members that are registered through the FSL office.
o Three (3) sober monitors (including one from the executive committee or equivalent) are required at a minimum.

For every 40 guests, invited to the event, an additional sober monitor will be required.

Upload your Sober Monitor list here:
n/a

RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upload your approved Risk Management Plan here:
[:♦- DOWNLOAD Fl~

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion

G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
E Wed, Apr 16, 2025 8:33 PM
Sober list for 4/18/25
(Iii AEPI_-_Sober _Monitor_List_ 4_18_25_-_Sheetl.pdf)
Reply
Your Review
G
Your Vote: None
Reviewers
Voting Reviewers
G ~ ( Association - Form)
M
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form

CANCEL POST
• • •

FSL Event Registration
- Mon, Apr 7, 2025 8:53 PM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Fri, Apr 18, 2025 8:19 AM
By: Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Comment: this event registration is accepted. don't forget to submit the post-event form by Wednesday at 12pm. thank you!

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi, Sigma Omega Chapter
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone#:

I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME

What is the name and theme of your event?
Bikini Bottom
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? Spongebob/beach t hemed clothing
Will alcohol be present at this event?
Yes

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
4/19/2025
Start Time of Event:
12:00
End Date of Event:
4/19/2025
End Time of Event:
4:00

LOCATION
Where is your event being held?

Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California

GUEST LIST
How many guests are you expecting at your event?
*FSL Event Registration Procedure requires a 2:1 (2 guests per 1 member) ratio at events with alcohol.*
160

SOBER MONITORS

All events where alcohol is present are required to have sober monitors designated and present.

Reminders:
o Chapters must utilize the sober monitor template provided by the FSL office. o All sober monitors must be organization members that are registered through the FSL office.
o Three (3) sober monitors (including one from the executive committee or equivalent) are required at a minimum.

For every 40 guests, invited to the event, an additional sober monitor will be required.

Upload your Sober Monitor list here:
n/a

RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upload your approved Risk Management Plan here:
[:♦- DOWNLOAD Fl~

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion

G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
E Sat, Apr 19, 2025 11:16 AM
Cancelled the event
Reply
E
Wed, Apr 16, 2025 8:34 PM
Sober list for 4/19/25
(~ AEPI_-_Sober _Monitor_List_ 4_19_25_-_Sheetl.pdf)
Reply
Your Review
G
Your Vote: None
Reviewers
Voting Reviewers
G ~ ( Association - Form)

CANCEL POST
• • •

M
Level 1 Association - Form 
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form

FSL Event Registration
- Tue, May 13, 2025 11:50 AM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Thu, May 15, 2025 6:14 PM
By:

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone #:
-
I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME
What is the name and theme of your event?

Chi-O Exchange
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? Canadian Tux (denim)
Will alcohol be present at this event?
No

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
5/14/2025
Start Time of Event:
8:00
End Date of Event:
5/14/2025
End Time of Event:
9:00

LOCATION

Where is your event being held?
Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion
G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
Your Review
G
Your Vote: None
Reviewers

CANCEL POST
• • •

Level 1 Association - Form G
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form
Voting Reviewers

FSL Event Registration
- Tue, May 13, 2025 11:59 AM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Thu, May 15, 2025 6:30 PM
By: Maks Velikanovs

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone #:
-
I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME
What is the name and theme of your event?

Gamma Phi Beta Exchange
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? Wild west attire
Will alcohol be present at this event?
No

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
5/15/2025
Start Time of Event:
8:00
End Date of Event:
5/15/2025
End Time of Event:
9:00

LOCATION

Where is your event being held?
Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion
G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
Your Review
G
Your Vote: None
Reviewers

CANCEL POST
• • •

Level 1 Association - Form G
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form
Voting Reviewers

FSL Event Registration
- Mon, May 19, 2025 5:22 PM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Thu, May 22, 2025 2:32 PM
By:

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone #:
-
I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME
What is the name and theme of your event?

aphi exchange
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? White lotus theme, white clothes
Will alcohol be present at this event?
No

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
5/22/2025
Start Time of Event:
7:00
End Date of Event:
5/22/2025
End Time of Event:
8:00

LOCATION

Where is your event being held?
Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion
G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
Your Review
G
Your Vote: None
Reviewers

CANCEL POST
• • •

Level 1 Association - Form G
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form
Voting Reviewers

FSL Event Registration
- Tue, May 27, 2025 4:31 PM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Thu, May 29, 2025 2:40 PM
By:

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi Sigma Omega Chapter
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone#:
-
I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME
What is the name and theme of your event?

white lies
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? white t shirt with lies on it
Will alcohol be present at this event?
No

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
5/27/2025
Start Time of Event:
8:00
End Date of Event:
5/27/2025
End Time of Event:
9:00

LOCATION

Where is your event being held?
Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California blvd

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion
G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
M Thu, May 29, 2025 2:40 PM
Sig Kap Exchange, Date change to 5/29
Reply

CANCEL POST

Reviewers
Your Review
Your Vote: None G  
Level 1 Association - Form
G
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form
Voting Reviewers

FSL Event Registration
- Wed, Oct 8, 2025 5:53 PM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Thu, Oct 9, 2025 1:33 PM
By:

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone #:
-
I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME
What is the name and theme of your event?

KKG Exchange
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? Formal Attire, Risky Business
Will alcohol be present at this event?
No

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
10/9/2025
Start Time of Event:
8:00
End Date of Event:
10/9/2025
End Time of Event:
9:00

LOCATION

Where is your event being held?
Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion
G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
Your Review
G
Your Vote: Approve
Reviewers

CANCEL POST
• • •

G Level 1 Association - Form 
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form
Voting Reviewers

FSL Event Registration
- Fri, Oct 3, 2025 1:39 PM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Thu, Oct 9, 2025 1:31 PM
By:

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi Sigma Omega Chapter
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone#:
-
I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME
What is the name and theme of your event?

rhyme without reason
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? Wearing costumes that rhyme with a partner
Will alcohol be present at this event?
Yes

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
10/11/2025
Start Time of Event:
8:00
End Date of Event:
10/11/2025
End Time of Event:
11:30

LOCATION

Where is your event being held?
Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California blvd

GUEST LIST
How many guests are you expecting at your event?
*FSL Event Registration Procedure requires a 2:1 (2 guests per 1 member) ratio at events with alcohol.*
80 SOBER MONITORS
All events where alcohol is present are required to have sober monitors designated and present.

Reminders:
o Chapters must utilize the sober monitor temP-late provided by the FSL office. o All sober monitors must be organization members that are registered through the FSL office.
o Three (3) sober monitors (including one from the executive committee or equivalent) are required at a minimum.

For every 40 guests, invited to the event, an additional sober monitor will be required.

Upload your Sober Monitor list here:
n/a

RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upload your approved Risk Management Plan here:
e:♦- DOWNLOAD Fl~

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion
G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
E Wed, Oct 8, 2025 11:13 AM
Here's our sober list. Thank you!
(Iii AEPI_-_Sober _Monitor _List_l0_11_25_ -_Sheetl.pdf)

CANCEL POST

Reply
Tue, Oct 7, 2025 10:58 AM
Hi, please get your SRMT approved sober monitor list in by thursday. Your president should have received an email of your chapters approved sober monitors. Thank you! Reply
G
Reviewers
Your Review
Your Vote: Approve
G  
G
Level 1 Association - Form 
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form
Voting Reviewers

FSL Event Registration
- Tue, Oct 14, 2025 1:48 PM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Thu, Oct 16, 202512:53 PM
By:

Comment: 8-9 PM

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi
What is your officer position?
Vice President
Phone#:
-
I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME
What is the name and theme of your event?

Exchange with Gamma Phi Beta
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? Casual
Will alcohol be present at this event?
No

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
10/16/2025
Start Time of Event:
7:00
End Date of Event:
10/16/2025
End Time of Event:
8:00

LOCATION

Where is your event being held?
Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California blvd

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion
G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
Your Review
G
Your Vote: Approve
Reviewers

CANCEL POST
• • •

G Level 1 Association - Form 
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form
Voting Reviewers

FSL Event Registration
- Thu, Nov 6, 2025 11:53 AM
Fraternity & Sorority Life
Approved
Date: Thu, Nov 6, 2025 12:39 PM
By:

INSTRUCTIONS
What is the name of your organization/chapter?
Alpha Epsilon Pi
What is your officer position?
Risk Manager
Phone#:
-
I will be in attendance at this event and can be reached during the event at the number listed above.

Yes

EVENT TITLE AND THEME
What is the name and theme of your event?

aphi exchange
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? anything mamma mia related
Will alcohol be present at this event?
No

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
11/6/2025
Start Time of Event:
8:00
End Date of Event:
11/6/2025
End Time of Event:
9:00

LOCATION

Where is your event being held?
Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion
G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment
Your Review
G
Your Vote: Approve
Reviewers

CANCEL POST
• • •

G Level 1 Association - Form 
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form
Voting Reviewers

What is the name and theme of your event?
Christmas theme
What is the expected attire for members and guests in coordination with name and theme? Christmas attire, holiday t hemed clothes
Will alcohol be present at this event?
Yes

DATE AND TIME OF EVENT
Sta rt Date of Event:
11/15/2025
Start Time of Event:
9:30
End Date of Event:
11/15/2025
End Time of Event:
11:59

LOCATION
Where is your event being held?

Chapter Facility
Enter the address, building name, and/or venue name of the event location:
280 California blvd

GUEST LIST
How many guests are you expecting at your event?
*FSL Event Registration Procedure requires a 2:1 (2 guests per 1 member) ratio at events with alcohol.*
160

SOBER MONITORS

All events where alcohol is present are required to have sober monitors designated and present.

Reminders:
o Chapters must utilize the sober monitor template provided by the FSL office. o All sober monitors must be organization members that are registered through the FSL office.
o Three (3) sober monitors (including one from the executive committee or equivalent) are required at a minimum.

For every 40 guests, invited to the event, an additional sober monitor will be required.

Upload your Sober Monitor list here:
n/a

RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
Upload your approved Risk Management Plan here:
[:♦- DOWNLOAD Fl~

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I acknowledge that all answers and documents are both accurate and factual.

Yes
Discussion

G
Write a message
~ Add an Attachment

CANCEL POST
G Thu, Nov 13, 2025 11:24 AM
Hi everyone except- is SRMT trained, but you guys are good to go without him per ratio policy Reply
E Wed, Nov 12, 2025 11:16 PM
Sober Monitor List 11/ 15/25
(~ AEPI_-_Sober _Monitor _List_11_25_25_ -_Sheetl.pdf)
Reply
Your Review
G
Your Vote: None
Reviewers
Voting Reviewers
G ~ ( Association - Form)
• • •

Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 2 Association - Form

with 30 people" or "This is a hula-hoop contest." This information is for risk assessment purposes and will not be advertised.

Rush Events for the fraternity
Do any of the following apply to your event?
(check all that apply)
None of the above or my event does not have any risk
Will there be any collection of funds?
Examples include:
selling items
collecting registration fees
charging admission
selling event sponsorships
No
Will you be playing licensed music or showing a licensed film or video (aka copyrighted material)?
No
Will alcohol be served or sold at this event?
No
In the event of a medical, fire, or security emergency during my event, I agree to call 911.

Yes
As a member of the organization sponsoring the event described on this document, I take responsibility to ensure that the activity will abide by all Cal Poly State University and ASI policies and procedures. I have reviewed the Cal Poly Recognized Student Organization (RSO)

 Add an Attachment

CANCEL POST
Reviewers
Your Review
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Your Vote: None  
J
Level 1 Association - Membership 
Greek Life G
Level 2 Association - Form 
Sarah 'Didi' Hawkins
Level 2 Association - Form 
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 3 Association - Form
Voting Reviewers

Post Event Feedback
Invite
Invite all members of this organization and all co-hosts after event approval No
Maximum number of RSVP spots allowed
150
Count guests against remaining RSVP spots
No
Limit number of guests per RSVP
No
Maximum number of guests allowed per RSVP
0 Organization Representation enabled
No
Organization Representation required
No
Automatically send Event Feedback email to attendees

Do any of the following apply to your event?
(check all that apply)
None of the above or my event does not have any risk
Will there be any collection of funds?
Examples include:
selling items
collecting registration fees
charging admission
selling event sponsorships
No
Will you be playing licensed music or showing a licensed film or video (aka copyrighted material)?
No
Will alcohol be served or sold at this event?
Yes
In the event of a medical, fire, or security emergency during my event, I agree to call 911.

Yes

Discussion
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
 Add an Attachment
Emergency Contact #2
Name:

Emergency Contact #2
Phone:

Is there anyone who will be attending your event who is trained in First Aid CPR/AED? No
Write a message

CANCEL POST
Your Review
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Your Vote: None  

Reviewers
J
Level 1 Association - Membership 
Greek Life G
Level 2 Association - Form 
Sarah 'Didi' Hawkins
Level 2 Association - Form 
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 3 Association - Form
Emily Rutherford E
Level 3 Association - Form 
Voting Reviewers

Where does your event take place?
Off-Campus
Please describe the event's theme and/or activities. Be specific. For example, don't just say "games." "Instead, state what kind of games. For example: "This is a board game tournament with 30 people" or "This is a hula-hoop contest." This information is for risk assessment purposes and will not be advertised.

A space rave at our main fraternity house where invited guests can socialize! Do any of the following apply to your event?
(check all that apply)
None of the above or my event does not have any risk
Will there be any collection of funds?
Examples include:
selling items
collecting registration fees
charging admission
selling event sponsorships
No
Will you be playing licensed music or showing a licensed film or video (aka copyrighted material)?
No
Will alcohol be served or sold at this event?
Yes

Discussion
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
 Add an Attachment
I agree to serve as the main event contact. I will be present at the event and I can be reached at the following phone number during the event:
(including area code)
Emergency Contact #2
Name:

Emergency Contact #2
Phone:

Is there anyone who will be attending your event who is trained in First Aid CPR/AED? No
Write a message

CANCEL POST
Your Review

Reviewers
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Your Vote: None  
J Level 1 Association - Membership 
Greek Life G Level 2 Association - Form 
Sarah 'Didi' Hawkins
Level 2 Association - Form 
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 3 Association - Form
Emily Rutherford E Level 3 Association - Form 
Voting Reviewers

Post Event Feedback
Open
Invite all members of this organization and all co-hosts after event approval No
Maximum number of RSVP spots allowed
0 Count guests against remaining RSVP spots
No
Limit number of guests per RSVP
No
Maximum number of guests allowed per RSVP
0 Organization Representation enabled
No
Organization Representation required
No
Automatically send Event Feedback email to attendees

Do any of the following apply to your event?
(check all that apply)
None of the above or my event does not have any risk
Will there be any collection of funds?
Examples include:
selling items
collecting registration fees
charging admission
selling event sponsorships
No
Will you be playing licensed music or showing a licensed film or video (aka copyrighted material)?
No
Will alcohol be served or sold at this event?
No
In the event of a medical, fire, or security emergency during my event, I agree to call 911.

Yes

 Add an Attachment
Greek Life
Tue, Feb 24, 2026 1:32 PM
Approved by AEPI president through text
Reply
Wed, Feb 18, 2026 3:06 PM
theme is rave
Reply
Write a message

CANCEL POST
G
A
Reviewers
Your Review
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Your Vote: None  
Z
Level 1 Association - Membership 
Greek Life G
Level 2 Association - Form 
Voting Reviewers

Sarah 'Didi' Hawkins
Level 2 Association - Form 
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 3 Association - Form
Level 2 Association - Membership
C
Non-Voting Reviewers

Where does your event take place?
Off-Campus
Please describe the event's theme and/or activities. Be specific. For example, don't just say "games." "Instead, state what kind of games. For example: "This is a board game tournament with 30 people" or "This is a hula-hoop contest." This information is for risk assessment purposes and will not be advertised.

Jewmanji themed party where you can meet the brothers
Do any of the following apply to your event?
(check all that apply)
None of the above or my event does not have any risk
Will there be any collection of funds?
Examples include:
selling items
collecting registration fees
charging admission
selling event sponsorships
No
Will you be playing licensed music or showing a licensed film or video (aka copyrighted material)?
No
Will alcohol be served or sold at this event?
Yes

Discussion
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
 Add an Attachment
I agree to serve as the main event contact. I will be present at the event and I can be reached at the following phone number during the event:
(including area code)
Emergency Contact #2
Name:

Emergency Contact #2
Phone:

Is there anyone who will be attending your event who is trained in First Aid CPR/AED? No
Write a message

CANCEL POST
Your Review

Reviewers
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Your Vote: None  
J Level 1 Association - Membership 
Greek Life G Level 2 Association - Form 
Sarah 'Didi' Hawkins
Level 2 Association - Form 
Elizabeth Aiello-Coppola
Level 3 Association - Form
Emily Rutherford E Level 3 Association - Form 
Voting Reviewers

R ______
RESOLUTION NO. _____ (2026 SERIES)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS

OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING AN APPEAL AND CONTINUING

THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A FRATERNITY LOCATED AT
280 CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD. THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTION 15301 (EXISTING

FACILITIES) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES AS REPRESENTED IN THE COUNCIL AGENDA
REPORT AND ATTACHMENTS DATED MAY 19, 2026 (MOD-0036-2026, APPL-0174-2026).

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo denied the appeal and upheld the Planning Commission’s approval of the Use Permit, U1099, on August 2, 1983, after duly considering all evidence, including testimony of the applicant and general public and evaluation, and recommendations by staff presented at said hearing; and WHEREAS, the City received complaints and issued citations for multiple, verified noise violations in 2023 and 2024; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, on November 13, 2024, for a re-review of the existing Conditional Use Permit, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under USE-0625-2024; Alpha Epsilon Pi, applicant; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo approved modifications to the Conditional Use Permit, USE-0625-2024, to allow the continuation of the fraternity at 280 California Boulevard, after duly considering all evidence, including the documented noise violations, testimony of the applicant and general public, and evaluation and recommendations by staff presented at said hearing; and WHEREAS, the City received complaints, and, between November 2024 and February 2026, the Police Department issued three citations, relating to noise violations at the property, including at least three citations within a 12-month period within these dates; and
WHEREAS, Code Enforcement issued a Notice of Violation on July 15, 2025, relating to the multiple, verified violations of the existing Use Permit; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, on March 11, 2026, for the re-review of an existing Conditional Use Permit, USE-0625-2024 (“Conditional Use Permit”), for fraternity use at 280 California Boulevard, pursuant to a proceeding instituted under MOD-0036-2026; and

Resolution No. _____ (2026 Series) Page 2
R ______
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Luis Obispo voted 7-0 to revoke Conditional Use Permit USE-0625-2024, after duly considering all evidence, including testimony of the applicant and general public and evaluation and recommendations by staff presented at said hearing; and WHEREAS, Joshua Pinsky, on behalf of Alpha Epsilon Pi, Sigma Omega Chapter, filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke the Conditional Use Permit, APPL-0175-2026, on March 23, 2026; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo conducted a public hearing in the Council Chamber of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, on May 19, 2026, for the purpose of considering an appeal of the Planning Commission’s decision to revoke the Conditional Use Permit, APPL-0174-2025, and has duly considered all evidence, including the record of the Planning Commission hearing; testimony of the applicant, appellant, and general public; and evaluation and recommendations by staff presented at said hearing; and
WHEREAS, notices of said public hearings were made at the time and in the manner required by law.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:

SECTION 1. Findings. The City Council hereby upholds the appeal and continues the Conditional Use Permit, USE-0625-2024, based on the following findings:

1. The project is consistent with the General Plan because the proposed fraternity is an allowable use as dense group housing in the High Density Residential (HDR) land use designation. In addition, the project would facilitate Land Use Element Policy 2.6.5 and Housing Element Policy 8.6 by locating a fraternity in proximity to the Cal Poly SLO campus and other student-oriented uses and housing.

2. The proposed fraternity is conditionally allowed within the High-Density Residential (R-4) zone. As conditioned, the project complies with applicable provisions of the Zoning Regulations because (a) the maximum number of 19 residents complies with the group housing maximum occupancy limits and (b) the revised parking configuration would provide 19 required spaces for 19 residents and comply with the City’s Parking and Driveway Standards to improve the property.

3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the project will be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity because the proposed fraternity would (a) be established in proximity to other dense group housing (i.e., other fraternities, sororities, multi-family, etc.), (b) located within walking distance (i.e., within 0.3-mile) of the Cal Poly campus, and (c) utilize an existing developed property with minor site improvements (i.e., parking and landscaping improvements).

Resolution No. _____ (2026 Series) Page 3
R ______

4. The site is physically suitable in terms of (a) its design, location, shape, size, and operating characteristics of the project; (b) traffic generation and the provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and medical) access; (c) public protection services (e.g., fire protection, police protection, etc.); and (d) the provision of utilities (e.g., potable water, schools, solid waste collection and disposal, storm drainage, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, etc.).

The project is surrounded by other developed properties with compatible dense housing uses, has access to the City’s circulation system, and would be served by City utilities. The project utilizes an existing developed property and does not include activities that would generate service or utility demands beyond those anticipated with uses permitted in the vicinity.

5. As conditioned, the project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of persons living or working at the site or in the vicinity because conditions have been included that place limits on the number of persons allowed on site, restrict activities, provide adequate parking, and limit potential disturbances to neighboring properties. The project will be compatible with the existing site constraints and the character of the neighborhood.

6. As conditioned, the establishment and subsequent operation or conduct of the project will not, because of the circumstances and conditions applied in the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the general public or persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the use, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the use because the project includes conditions that (a) place limits on the number of persons allowed on site, (b) restrict activities, (c) provide adequate parking, and (d) limit potential disturbances to neighboring properties. The project would be compatible with the existing site constraints and the character of the neighborhood made.

SECTION 2. Environmental Review. The project is exempt from environmental review under Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines because it includes the continued operation and permitting of an existing residential use (i.e., fraternity) with revised findings and conditions of approval. The project does not include construction of a new building or additional building square footage. Therefore, the project involves no expansion of the existing residential use.

SECTION 3. Action. The City Council hereby approves modifications to the Conditional Use Permit to allow the continuation of the fraternity (USE-0625-2024), based on the following conditions:

Planning Division – Community Development Department.

1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Community Development Director for compliance with the conditions of approval, or to determine whether a modification of the Conditional Use Permit is necessary upon significant change to the project as represented in the Staff Report dated November 13,

Resolution No. _____ (2026 Series) Page 4
R ______
2024, or in the event of a change in ownership which may result in deviation from the project description or approved plans.

2. The Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission as soon as practical if: 1) conduct on the permitted premises results in three (3) citations within any 12-month period for a violation of law or permit condition, 2) that citation is not contested or is upheld on appeal, and 3) the conduct for which the citation was issued resulted in adverse impacts to, or complaints from, residents or occupants of the surrounding neighborhood. At the time of the Conditional Use Permit review, to ensure ongoing compatibility with nearby uses, the conditions of approval may be added, modified, and/or removed, or the Conditional Use Permit may be revoked. The City shall notify Cal Poly if the Use Permit is revoked. A re-review by the Planning Commission shall be accompanied by the appropriate fee.

3. The fraternity shall be limited to a maximum of 19 residents for the property.

The property owner shall allow the City to verify the maximum occupancy by allowing an inspection of records or visual inspection of the premises. Any inspection shall be scheduled at a reasonable time with at least 24-hour notice to the residents.

4. Routine meetings and gatherings for the fraternity shall be limited to a maximum of 25 people (rounded up from 24.75 = 16.5 people x 1.5), except as otherwise approved by the Community Development Director for special events. If the fraternity hosts special events involving more than 25 people, a transportation management plan to reduce impacts to the surrounding neighborhood shall be submitted to the Community Development Department, at least 30 days prior to the event taking place, for review and approval. No exception from the Noise Ordinance shall be approved by the Director as part of the special event.

5. For the life of the organization, the fraternity shall remain affiliated and in good standing with the Interfraternity Council of Student Life and Leadership at California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo. If the fraternity becomes unaffiliated or is no longer in good standing, the Conditional Use Permit shall be revoked.

6. For the life of the organization, the fraternity shall provide the name and contact information (i.e., phone number and email address) of all responsible parties to the Community Development Department and Neighborhood Services Manager of the Police Department on an annual basis. If there is a change to the name and/or contact information of any responsible parties, the Community Development Department and Neighborhood Services Manager shall be notified immediately.

7. For the life of the organization, the property shall be maintained in a clean and orderly manner. All landscaping shall be replaced as necessary and maintained (e.g., trimmed, pruned, etc.) to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.

Resolution No. _____ (2026 Series) Page 5
R ______

8. A minimum of 19 parking spaces shall be provided and maintained at all times.

These spaces shall remain available to residents of the fraternity and not designated for any individuals not residing on the property.

9. The fraternity use shall comply with Table 1 (Exterior Noise Limits) of Section

9.12.060 (Exterior Noise Limits) between the extended hours of 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m.

10.Prior to a special event approved by the Community Development Director pursuant to Condition No. 4, the fraternity shall provide written notification of the event to occupants within 300 feet of the site. The written notification shall include the date, hours, and contact information for the responsible party for the special event. No exception from the Noise Ordinance shall be approved by the Director as part of the special event.

11.Live entertainment, bands, and/or amplified sounds are prohibited, unless otherwise approved through a special event by the Community Development Department. No exception from the Noise Ordinance shall be approved by the Director as part of the special event.

12.Failure to comply with any of the above conditions or code requirements, or the conduct of the use so as to constitute a violation of Federal, State, or local law, or so as to constitute a public nuisance or so as to cause adverse impacts on the health, safety, or welfare of persons in the vicinity of this use is prohibited and may constitute grounds for the revocation of this permit.

13.Within 60 days of the re-review hearing with the Planning Commission on November 13, 2024, the fraternity shall install a minimum of 19 bicycle spaces (one space for each resident) and contact the City for a follow-up inspection to verify that all required bicycle spaces have been installed.

Indemnification

14.The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and/or its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City and/or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul, the approval by the City of this project, and all actions relating thereto, including but not limited to environmental review (“Indemnified Claims”). The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Indemnified Claim upon being presented with the Indemnified Claim and the City shall fully cooperate in the defense against an Indemnified Claim.

Upon motion of Council Member ___________, seconded by Council Member ___________, and on the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

The foregoing resolution was adopted this 19th day of May 2026.

Resolution No. _____ (2026 Series) Page 6
R ______
___________________________
Mayor Erica A. Stewart
ATTEST:
______________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________. ___________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk

City of San Luis Obispo, Council Memorandum
City of San Luis Obispo
Council Agenda Correspondence
DATE: May 19, 2026
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Aaron Floyd, Public Works and Utilities Director
Prepared By: Luke Schwartz, Transportation Manager
VIA: Whitney McDonald, City Manager
SUBJECT: ITEM #6b – 2026 VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN
Staff received the following questions regarding the 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan. The questions are below with staff’s response shown in italics:
1) Is it possible to rename the “Vision Zero Action Plan” to use a title that more clearly identifies the purpose of the plan?
If an alternative title is proposed, staff recommends retaining the phrase “Vision Zero Action Plan” in some capacity, potentially as a subtitle, as this terminology may assist with future grant funding opportunities related to traffic safety.

The following are examples of alternative plan titles that may help guide Council discussion on this topic:
a) SLO Safe Streets Plan
b) SLO Safe Mobility Plan
c) Safe Streets for SLO
d) San Luis Obispo Road Safety Plan
2) What is the City doing to address unsafe use of e-bikes and other motorized bicycles/scooters?
The growth in popularity of various types of electronic mobility devices, including e-bikes, motorized scooters, electric motorcycles/mopeds, and other motorized personal transportation devices has increased access to sustainable transportation options, but also introduced unique challenges with safety and enforcement of these emerging transportation modes, particularly among minors.

Item #6b – 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan Page 2
Many communities, including San Luis Obispo, have experienced increased reports of reckless riding, excessive speeds, conflicts with pedestrians, and other safety concerns associated with unsafe operation of these devices. In many cases, these concerns involve high-powered electric motorcycles or mopeds that may resemble traditional bicycles or scooters but are regulated differently under the California Vehicle Code due to their motor power and speed capabilities. Some of these devices may not be legal to operate on public streets, bike lanes, or shareduse paths, while others may require vehicle registration, a driver’s license, and the driver must be 16 years or older.

The Vision Zero Action Plan includes recommendations to continue targeted education and enforcement efforts related to e-bike and motorized device safety. The City’s Roll and Stroll Resource Hub includes educational materials focused on e-bike safety, and staff will continue to expand outreach efforts through City-led communications and partnerships with organizations such as Bike SLO County, the SLO Bicycle Club, SLO Rideshare, SLO County Public Health, and the San Luis Coastal Unified School District.

Several existing state laws already regulate e-bike operation based on classification, age, and location. For example, Class 3 e-bikes (pedal assist up to 28 mph) are prohibited for riders under 16 years of age. Cities and counties throughout California are increasingly exploring local ordinances to further regulate e-bike access and operation in response to safety concerns. These discussions have included expanded age restrictions for Class 1 and Class 2 e-bikes, as well as operational restrictions in certain areas. In some cases, additional authority from the State Legislature may be required before local agencies can implement or enforce certain regulations. Current state classifications for e-bikes include the following:
 Class 1: Pedal-assist only, with a maximum assisted speed of 20 mph.  Class 2: Throttle-assisted (no pedaling required), with a maximum assisted speed of 20 mph.
 Class 3: Pedal-assist only, with a maximum assisted speed of 28 mph; helmet use is required; restricted to ages 16 and older, and operation on shared-use pedestrian/bicycle paths is restricted unless specifically permitted.

City staff will continue to monitor relevant legislation and provide support consistent with the City’s Legislative Action Platform. Staff will also continue researching potential local ordinances for consideration by the Active Transportation Committee and City Council.

Item #6b – 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan Page 3
3) Has the City observed a clear increase in crash frequency or severity due to the rise in popularity of e-bikes and other electronic devices? Staff reviewed recent severe and fatal collision data to better understand trends associated with these transportation modes. During the collision analysis period included in the Vision Zero Action Plan (2020–2024), four severe injury collisions involved e-bikes, e-skateboards, or e-scooters, accounting for approximately 5% of all severe injury and fatal collisions citywide. Review of preliminary 2025 collision data indicates a recent increase in severe injury and fatal collisions involving ebikes and e-scooters, with five such collisions reported for the 2025 calendar year.

While this trend warrants continued monitoring, the majority of severe and fatal bicycle-related crashes during the analysis period did not specifically involve ebikes. 4) Has staff considered amending the City’s Municipal Code to allow bicycle riding on sidewalks for all users, or at a minimum for minors? Currently, the City Municipal Code prohibits bicycle riding on sidewalks within the City limits. In recent years, however, several community members have suggested reconsidering these restrictions, particularly for school-aged children and other riders who may not feel comfortable bicycling in higher-stress on-street environments.

The California Vehicle Code generally delegates regulation of sidewalk bicycling to local agencies. As a result, regulations vary significantly between jurisdictions.

Some cities and counties permit sidewalk riding only for minors, some allow sidewalk riding for all users, and others, including San Luis Obispo, prohibit sidewalk riding altogether.

The Active Transportation Committee (ATC) held a focused discussion on this topic at its January 19, 2023, meeting; however, no formal recommendation or action was taken at that time.

The Vision Zero Action Plan does not currently recommend amendments to the Municipal Code related to sidewalk bicycling. Potential arguments in favor of allowing sidewalk cycling, at least for minors, the potential to increase cycling mode share and comfort for riders who may not feel comfortable riding in higherstress on-street environments where protected or off-street bikeways are not available. From an enforcement standpoint this would be very challenging to address. Opposing arguments against legalizing sidewalk riding include concerns regarding conflicts with pedestrians. Some studies show higher crash rates when cycling on the sidewalk vs. riding on street, potential for increased legal exposure to the City if crashes involve a cyclist on the sidewalk, and increased potential for ambiguity and confusion in assigning fault/liability when crashes occur between motor vehicles and cyclists riding on sidewalks (the State Vehicle Code has some ambiguity regarding right-of-way when riding on street vs. on sidewalks).

Item #6b – 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan Page 4
Staff anticipates continued discussions on this topic with the Police Department, the Active Transportation Committee, and the community prior to advancing any formal recommendations related to Municipal Code amendments. 5) Can you provide more details on the crash history for San Luis Drive? (i.e. crash locations, severity, types/factors, related to SLO High School activities?)
There were 14 reported collisions along San Luis Drive between California Boulevard and Johnson Avenue between 2020 and 2025. Collision history shows a concentration of speed-related and/or run-off-road collisions, fixed-object collisions, and turning conflicts involving bicyclists and other roadway users outside of motor vehicles.

Three collisions at the San Luis Drive/Johnson Avenue intersection involved drivers failing to obey traffic signals, while two collisions at the San Luis Drive/California Boulevard intersection involved improper turning movements.

Additional collisions occurred near the southbound bike lane, the San Luis Obispo High School driveway, and various midblock locations along the corridor.

While it is difficult to definitively determine whether collisions were directly related to San Luis Obispo High School activities, four of the 14 collisions occurred during typical school arrival or dismissal periods, suggesting potential school-related travel. These collisions included the following:
 A severe injury collision involving a high school-aged driver making a southbound left turn into the high school driveway and failing to yield to a northbound motorcyclist.
 A northbound vehicle turning into the State Farm driveway and failing to yield to a southbound high school-aged bicyclist.
 A passenger exiting a parked vehicle on the southbound side of the roadway and opening a door into a skateboarder traveling in the bike lane on the way to school.
 An illegal U-turn by a high school-aged driver north of the California Boulevard intersection resulting in a collision with a bicyclist. 6) How does the Vision Zero Action Plan address Safe Routes to School priorities?
Safe Routes to School considerations are a key component of the Vision Zero Action Plan and are reflected in both specific recommendations and broader systemic safety strategies. This includes Table 11, Policy and Planning Recommendation #7 regarding Safe Routes to School planning, and Table 13, Recommendation #1 regarding improvements near San Luis Obispo High School.

Item #6b – 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan Page 5
Additional recommendations throughout the Plan include pursuing reduced speed limits in school zones, prioritizing traffic calming and crosswalk daylighting near schools, and improving access to low-stress walking and bicycling routes that parallel major high-speed corridors (see Figure 19 and Table 11, Engineering Recommendation #9).

Additionally, on September 19, 2025, the Active Transportation Committee (ATC) created a subcommittee to evaluate whether a recommendation should be made to the City Council to pursue development of a Citywide Safe Routes to School Plan, either as a stand-alone plan or as a supplement to the current Active Transportation Plan. The subcommittee provides regular updates during public ATC meetings and expects to present findings and recommendations to the full committee in summer of 2026. This timing would allow the ATC to provide recommendations to the City Council for consideration during development of the FY 2027–29 Financial Plan and Major City Goals discussion.
7) Why are we not seeing more “quick-build” projects advanced more rapidly? The City’s Active Transportation Plan includes recommendations to advance quickbuild walking and bicycling improvements using lower-cost temporary materials and pilot projects where feasible. “Quick-build” projects generally utilize materials such as paint, signage, delineators, rubber curbing, or temporary barriers that can be installed more quickly and at a lower cost than permanent concrete or roadway reconstruction improvements. Similarly, the Vision Zero Action Plan recommends using quick-build strategies both to accelerate implementation of safety improvements and to test street design changes prior to permanent installation.

While quick-build projects can often be implemented more rapidly than permanent capital improvements, they still require engineering review, coordination with emergency services and transit providers, community outreach, and evaluation of potential impacts to surrounding neighborhoods and roadway users and sometimes require monitoring results during a “pilot” period to determine effectiveness. Staff works to ensure that proposed quick-build improvements do not create unintended safety concerns or negatively impact adjacent residents, businesses, pedestrians, bicyclists, transit operations, or drivers before implementation.

In recent years, the City has implemented numerous quick-build projects, including the following:
 Pilot street reconfiguration on Higuera Street in the downtown core during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, converting a third traffic lane into a striped bike lane using paint prior to permanent installation in 2022.  Installation of painted quick-build bulbouts along the Morro and Nipomo Greenways in 2022.
 Pilot five-lane to three-lane street reconfiguration on Johnson Avenue between Bishop Street and Laurel Lane in 2021 prior to permanent installation in 2023.

Item #6b – 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan Page 6
 Pilot complete streets improvements on Grand Avenue in 2024, including a five-lane to three-lane street reconfiguration, quick-build bulbouts, new crosswalks, and protected bike lanes prior to planned permanent improvements associated with the 2027 paving project.
 Quick-build pedestrian crossing improvements at numerous locations using solar-powered Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs), which can be deployed more quickly than hard-wired electrical systems or more substantial crossing improvements such as traffic signals or pedestrian hybrid beacons.

There have also been several complete streets projects that may otherwise have required phased quick-build implementation if the City had not successfully secured outside state and federal grant funding for more comprehensive improvements, including the North Chorro Greenway and Higuera Complete Streets Project.

Staff will continue to deploy quick-build strategies where feasible, including through the forthcoming speed cushion pilot program, and complete streets planning for South Broad Street and Foothill Boulevard, both of which have obtained Federal Safe Streets and Road for All (SS4A) grant funding to support pilot/quick-build safety improvements.
8) Why does the Action Plan not include specific safety improvement recommendations for Johnson Avenue or other streets where community members have expressed concerns for safety?
The location-specific engineering recommendations contained in the Vision Zero Action Plan focus on the High Injury Network (HIN), which represents approximately 11% of City streets and where 80% of fatal and severe injury crashes occur. The Plan recommends prioritizing City funding and staffing resources within the HIN in order to most effectively improve traffic safety outcomes.

This is not intended to suggest that safety concerns in other areas of San Luis Obispo are not valid or worthy of attention. The Plan includes numerous systemic safety recommendations intended for broader implementation citywide, as resources allow. These include speed reduction measures on higher-speed arterial roadways, crosswalk daylighting, and pedestrian and bicycle improvements near schools, parks, and senior living facilities.

Additionally, Appendix A of the Plan includes a list of other local high-crash intersections and roadway segments beyond the HIN, as well as links to an online crash data map and a Vision Zero public input map. These tools may help guide future traffic safety projects, enforcement efforts, and planning initiatives, particularly where improvements can be coordinated with other City capital projects or development review processes.

Item #6b – 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan Page 7
Johnson Avenue does not currently meet the threshold for inclusion in the High Injury Network based on crash frequency and severity. However, this does not preclude future implementation of proactive safety improvements along the corridor, including speed limit reductions, radar speed feedback signs, intersection daylighting, or pedestrian and bicycle crossing enhancements.

Pedestrian crossing concerns at the Johnson Avenue/Southwood Drive intersection have been raised in several pieces of public correspondence related to the Vision Zero Action Plan. This intersection was evaluated during planning for the 2024 Roadway Sealing Project. Engineering staff concluded that more substantial intersection enhancements, such as a roundabout or pedestrian hybrid beacon, would likely be necessary beyond what could reasonably be implemented as part of a routine paving project or through lower-cost striping and signage improvements.
9) What can the City do to address safety concerns on Santa Rosa Street? As noted in the Action Plan, a portion of Santa Rosa Street between Marsh Street and the northern City limits is identified as part of the High Injury Network. The Plan includes analysis of crash trends and recommendations for future engineering improvements along this corridor, as summarized in Table 21.

As also discussed in the Plan, the majority of Santa Rosa Street north of Walnut Street is designated as State Route 1 and falls under the jurisdiction of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The City regularly collaborates with Caltrans through data-sharing, coordination, and project development efforts related to state highway facilities within City limits. However, the City does not have full discretion to implement roadway design changes on these facilities without Caltrans review and approval.

Recently, the City partnered with Caltrans and SLOCOG to advance safety improvements at the Santa Rosa Street/Highland Drive intersection, which Caltrans is anticipated to construct in summer 2026. Staff intends to continue coordinating closely with Caltrans regarding future improvements along Santa Rosa Street where feasible, including recommendations identified in the Vision Zero Action Plan such as potential pedestrian crossing improvements between Olive Street and Murray Avenue and safety enhancements at the Santa Rosa/Foothill Boulevard and Santa Rosa/Boysen Avenue intersections. 10)Table 2 in the staff report suggests numerous short-term funding priorities.

Are there any actions identified for the Laguna Middle School or SLO High School areas (from the Chapter 3 tables) that would be good candidates for short-term funding priorities?
Yes. Under the “Projects Already in Progress” section of the staff report, the following improvements are already planned in the San Luis Obispo High School area as part of the 2026 Roadway Sealing Project:

Item #6b – 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan Page 8
 San Luis Drive restriping between California Boulevard and Johnson Avenue to add buffered bike lanes, green conflict zone markings, narrower travel lanes to reduce speeding, improved bike lane channelization at the SLO High School main entrance, additional school zone warning signage, a bike box at the San Luis Drive/Johnson Avenue intersection, and strategically placed flex posts to reduce illegal parking and encroachment into bike lanes.  Johnson Avenue improvements, including buffered bike lanes between Buchon Street and San Luis Drive, radar speed feedback signs, additional speed limit warning signage, and pavement markings between San Luis Drive and Bishop Street.

Of the new projects recommended for prioritization through the end of FY 2027 in Table 2, the following are located near Laguna Middle School or San Luis Obispo High School:
 Los Osos Valley Road (LOVR)/Descanso traffic signal modification.  Speed limit reductions and visibility enhancements, including evaluation of reduced speed limits along LOVR near Laguna Middle School and along San Luis Drive and Johnson Avenue near SLO High School.
 Installation of up to six radar speed feedback signs along the High Injury Network. Final locations have not yet been determined but could include San Luis Drive.
 Crosswalk daylighting improvements prioritizing locations near schools, parks, senior facilities, and areas with a history of pedestrian and bicycle collisions, including Laguna Middle School and San Luis Obispo High School.

Additional major capital projects or planning efforts near these schools would typically be considered through development of the FY 2027–29 Financial Plan.

Potential CIP project requests may include a focused safe routes to school improvement plan for SLO High, which could explore more substantive improvements along San Luis Drive and along (or parallel to Johnson Ave), such as preliminary planning/engineering for the Flora-Fixilini Greenway route. 11)Table ES-1 #2 says that recent changes in state code would allow for decreasing speed limits in certain areas. Can any of these be implemented now or do they require additional analysis?
Staff has begun evaluating streets that may qualify for reduced speed limits under recent state law changes. However, implementation requires updated speed surveys and preparation of Engineering and Traffic Studies to support revisions to posted speed limits. This effort is identified as a priority recommendation in Table 2 of the staff report, and staff believes speed limit reductions on several High Injury Network corridors may be feasible within the coming months.

Item #6b – 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan Page 9
12)What is the LOSSAN rail/facility project identified in Table ES-2? The LOSSAN Central Coast Layover Facility is a planned project near the existing San Luis Obispo rail station intended to support future expansion of Amtrak passenger rail service. During project planning, the City coordinated with LOSSAN to include construction of a portion of the City’s planned shared-use pedestrian and bicycle path along the west side of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks as part of the project.

The path is expected to be constructed in phases. The first phase would include the segment between the Amtrak station and Alphonso Street, while a future phase would extend the facility south toward Francis Avenue. Staff is not 100% certain on the latest schedule for start of construction but can research this further if desired.
13)What improvements identified for South Higuera St in Table ES-2 are not already identified in the current complete streets plan? The Vision Zero Action Plan recommends several additional improvements for the Higuera Street corridor that extend beyond what could feasibly be advanced within the scope of the Higuera Complete Streets Project. These recommendations include the following:
 Construction of improvements associated with the Prado Creek Bridge Project, including reconstruction of the Higuera/Prado intersection as a protected intersection with improved lighting, protected-only left-turn signal phasing, and high-visibility reflective signal backplates.
 Construction of planned roadway widening and sidewalk gap closure improvements along the east side of Higuera Street between Chumash Lane and Fontana Avenue. Although this project has been designed, it has been deferred due to challenges obtaining the necessary off-site right-of-way.  Modification of the Higuera/Suburban traffic signal to provide protected-only leftturn phasing, high-visibility signal backplates, and an illuminated “RIGHT TURN YIELD TO BIKE/PED” sign. This project is currently under construction and is anticipated to be completed by June 2026.
 Evaluation of additional modifications at the Higuera/Suburban intersection to address a history of bicycle right-hook collisions. Potential improvements may require right-of-way acquisition, utility relocations, and tree removal to accommodate a dedicated northbound right-turn lane and/or protected bicycle intersection features.
 Consideration of raised center medians at locations with a history of broadside collisions to restrict left turns from midblock driveways.  Evaluation of modifications to reduce complexity at the Higuera/Bianchi/High/Pismo intersection, potentially including realignment of Bianchi Lane opposite High Street.

Item #6b – 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan Page 10
 Improved awareness and expansion of low-stress pedestrian and bicycle routes parallel to Higuera Street, including future extensions of the Bob Jones Trail and the planned shared-use path between Prado Road and Innovation Way.  Evaluation of future opportunities to reconstruct on-street bike lanes along Higuera Street as sidewalk-level protected bicycle lanes, which may require roadway widening.
14)Does the injury/death data have age or disability status? Could hotspots for children and folks with disabilities be identified?
The currently available collision data cannot be readily filtered by disability status; therefore, staff does not currently have detailed information regarding crash trends involving disabled victims.

Chapter 2 of the Vision Zero Action Plan (see page 84) does include age-related data for severe injury and fatal collisions during the five-year analysis period (2020–2024). During this period, 6% of severe injury crash victims involved individuals between the ages of 0 and 19, and no fatal collisions were reported within this age group.

The severe injury collisions involving victims between the ages of 0 and 19 occurred at the following locations:
 2021 – Foothill Boulevard/Santa Rosa Street (18-year-old pedestrian)  2022 – San Luis Drive/California Boulevard (17-year-old motorcyclist)  2023 – Foothill Boulevard/Patricia Drive (8-year-old vehicle passenger)  2024 – Osos Street/Islay Street (17-year-old driver)
 2024 – Higuera Street/Suburban Road (7- and 8-year-old vehicle passengers) Recommended Administrative Edits to Vision Zero Action Plan:

In addition to the above-listed questions, staff is recommending a series of minor administrative edits to the 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan based on feedback provided between publication of the staff report and the May 19, 2026, Council Hearing.

As part of the staff presentation, the following edits to the Plan (Attachment A) are proposed for Council consideration:
1) Table ES-1 and Table 11 (Safer Streets (Engineering) Proactive Safety Recommendations:
a. Minor revisions to Engineering Recommendation #2 (Traffic Calming) and #3 (Bicyclist Safety Recommendations) to clarify that emergency services will review proposed projects during design, and that final approval authority rests with the City Council.
2) Figure 19 (Low-Stress Bicycle Routes Parallel to High Injury Network) a. Add Flora-Fixilini Greenway to map as a parallel low-stress route to San Luis Drive and Johnson Avenue.

Item #6b – 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan Page 11
3) Table ES-2 and Table 23 (Education Recommendations)
a. Minor revisions to Recommendation #2 to clarify that bicyclist safety education includes information regarding safe e-bike use, proper operation of electric motorcycles and mopeds, and awareness of non-street-legal electric devices.
4) Table ES-4 and Table 26 (Post Crash Care Recommendations) a. Refined language in Recommendation #6 to affirm recommendation to explore feasibility of more nimble emergency response vehicles with future fire apparatus purchases and replacements.
5) Road Diet Terminology
a. Replace use of the term “road diet” with “road reconfiguration” throughout the Action Plan where appropriate. “Road reconfiguration” is also a commonly used term in state and federal transportation planning guidance for traffic lane reductions.

Markups reflecting these proposed administrative edits to the currently published Vision Zero Action Plan are included as Attachment A to this agenda correspondence. Note that because the term “road diet” is used numerous times in the Action Plan, each individual edit to replace “road diet” with “road reconfiguration” per #5 above is not shown in Attachment A.

ATTACHMENT
A - Proposed Vision Zero Action Plan Edits

131

1 Improve Visibility and Awareness of Posted Speed Limits Install speed feedback signs and additional speed limit signs and markings to increase awareness of posted speed limits to address illegal speeding.
2 Implement Traffic Calming Measures
a. Consider striping changes to narrow vehicle lanes and reduce number of traffic lanes where capacity far exceeds demand, where feasible and including review and input from approved by emergency services. b. Install curb extensions and bulb outs at intersections with large pedestrian crossing distances or high vehicle turning speeds.
c. Install raised medians to consolidate left-turns and restrict minor street movements where appropriate. d. Install radar speed feedback signs on high-speed arterial and collector streets. e. Explore addition of physical traffic calming elements on streets with high collision rates, history of high speeds, and near concentrations of vulnerable road users (i.e. schools, parks, senior living facilities, priority ATP corridors).

Consider use of speed humps, speed tables/raised crosswalks, speed cushions (on priority emergency response and transit corridors) and neighborhood traffic circles at appropriate locations and where approved by emergency service providers.
3 Bicyclist Safety Recommendations
a. Evaluate the feasibility of bicycle left turn boxes at high-speed signalized intersections. b. Install protected bike lanes (where approved by including review and input from emergency services), shared use paths, and buffered bike lanes pursuant to the City’s Active Transportation Plan (ATP). c. Install green pavement markings and warning signage where bike lanes cross high-traffic driveways and intersections.
d. Explore bicyclist crossing improvements, such as dedicated bicycle signals, and high-visibility crossings with flashing beacon systems, when appropriate, on high-speed streets with roadway sections that have a long distances between controlled crossing opportunities and/or high levels of bicycle crossing demand. e. Install “WRONG WAY” bicycle lane signage at locations along the corridor with a history of illegal/unsafe behavior by cyclists and where opportunities to provide two-way bicycle access are not appropriate/feasible. f. Install right/left turn yield to bikes signage when appropriate. 4 Pedestrian Safety Recommendations
a. Install high-vis crosswalks at all marked crosswalks and advance limit lines at stop signs and signalized intersections. b. Explore pedestrian crossing improvements, such as traffic signals or Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons (PHBs) when appropriate, on high-speed streets with roadway sections that have a limited presence of controlled intersection crossings for large distances.
c. Enhance unsignalized crosswalks with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) with median refuge islands. d. Install signage to discourage crossings at locations with a history of illegal/unsafe pedestrian behavior and explore opportunities to install alternative facilities at nearby locations. e. Evaluate right-turn on red blank out signs or restrictions at signalized intersections.

Table ES-1 and Table 11

Broad
Santa Rosa
California
Higuera
Chorro
Cerro Romauldo
South Higuera
Tank Farm
Los Osos Valley
Grand
Monterey
Marsh
Highland
Orcutt
Madonna
Johnson
Nipomo
Islay
Toro
Victoria
Oceanaire
Galleon
Froom Ranch
Mill
Woodbridge
Morro
King
Foothill
Ramona
Broad
Murray
Casa
Dalidio
Fixlini
Flora
¯
NTS
Figure 19: Low-Stress Bicycle Routes Parallel to High Injury Network San Luis Obispo, CA
City Limit
High Injury Network
Low-Stress Bicycle Network - Existing
Low-Stress Bicycle Network - Proposed
Cerro Romauldo
Neighborhood Greenway
Planned Marsh Street
Undercrossing Shared-Use Path
Madonna Road Shared-Use Path
Planned Madonna Road Separated Bikeway
Shared-Use Path (Madonna Inn to Higuera)
Oceanaire Neighborhood Greenway
Bob Jones Trail
Planned Bob Jones Trail Extension
(LOVR to Octagon Barn)
Existing Railroad Safety Trail
(Cal Poly to Mill)
Planned Pepper St Bikeway
Improvements
Existing Downtown
Neighborhood Greenways and
Bike Lanes
Planned Railroad Safety Trail on
West Side of UPRR Tracks (High
Street to McMillan)
Railroad Safety Trail (Orcutt to
Amtrak Station)
Planned Railroad Safety Trail
Extension (Tiburon to Orcutt)
Railroad Safety Trail (Tank Farm
to Tiburon)
Dalidio & Froom Ranch Way
Shared-Use Paths
Planned Bikeway Connection
between Tank Farm and Prado
Woodbridge/Victoria
Neighborhood Greenway
North Chorro
Neighborhood Greenway
2020-2024
Potential Bicycle/Pedestrian
Connection (Ferrini to Boysen)
Flora-Fixlini Neighborhood Greenway
(Southwood to SLO High School)

169

2 Target focused road user education on the following topics, which address the user behavior identified in collision data and violation analysis that contribute to the most severe collision types:

Drivers  Illegal Speeding  Distracted Driving  Impaired Driving  Dangerous behaviors during nighttime hours  Yielding Right-of-Way to Bicycles and Pedestrians at Intersections/Driveways and Crossings with Pedestrian Beacons
Pedestrians  Safe Practices for Street Crossings & Right-of-Way Laws  Night-Time Visibility  Tips for Using Pedestrian Beacons  Proper Use of Scooters and Micro-mobility Devices (with a focus on middle and high school age users)
Bicyclists  Wrong-Way & Sidewalk Riding  Night-Time Visibility  Safety Tips at Intersection Crossings  Proper Use of E-Bikes, motorized bicycles/mopeds, and non-street-legal motorized devices (with a focus on young and older age users)
Public Works/Mobility
Services
3 Target traffic safety education and outreach to unhoused community members, who are overrepresented in roadway fatalities and severe injuries. Topic areas include pedestrian right-ofway laws, pedestrian/bicycle visibility, and available services for overnight shelter and transitional housing.

Public Works/Mobility
Services
4 Continue to update the City’s Legislative Action Platform (as approved by the City Council) and advocate for policy and regulatory changes at the state and national levels to support mental health services and transitional housing for unhoused community members. City Administration 5 Initiate an education campaign to raise awareness of the City’s low-stress bicycle routes, as shown in Figure 19Figure 19, highlighting them as alternative routes parallel to the High Injury Network.

Public Works
Mobility Services
City
Admin/Communications
Formatted: Font: 11 pt
Table ES-2 and Table 23

Table ES-3 and Table 26

Item 6b
Department: Public Works
Cost Center: 5010
For Agenda of: 5/19/2025
Placement: Public Hearing
Estimated Time: 90 Minutes
FROM: Aaron Floyd, Public Works & Utilities Director
Prepared By: Luke Schwartz, Transportation Manager
Dana Murray, Transportation Planner/Engineer
SUBJECT: 2026 VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN

RECOMMENDATION

1. Receive a staff presentation on the 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan and adopt a Draft Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, approving the 2026 City of San Luis Obispo Vision Zero Action Plan” (Attachment A); and

2. Provide feedback on suggested Vision Zero project priorities listed in the Council Agenda Report.

REPORT-IN-BRIEF
While the City has reduced overall traffic collisions by nearly 60% over the past 20 years through its ongoing Traffic Safety Program, further action is needed to prevent the most severe collisions resulting in death or life-altering injury. The City Council adopted the “Vision Zero” goal in 2016, affirming that no loss of life or severe injury on City streets is acceptable (Resolution No. 10746 (2016 Series).

However, 19 community members have been killed on city streets between 2020 and 20241, the highest five-year total since the City began formally monitoring collision trends over three decades ago. The Vision Zero Action Plan (Plan) builds on the City’s Traffic Safety Program by shifting toward a Safe Systems approach focused on preventing the most severe outcomes of collisions.

The Plan identifies priority areas of focus, including engineering improvements, education and enforcement strategies, post-crash care and emergency response coordination, and advocacy for safer vehicle design.

The purpose of this report is to present the Vision Zero Action Plan for Council consideration and adoption and to request feedback on identified near-term implementation priorities.

1 The collision data presented in the Vision Zero Action Plan primarily reflects the most recently available five-year period (2020-2024).

Item 6b

POLICY CONTEXT
The information and recommendations presented in the Vision Zero Action Plan support the City’s Major City Goal of Infrastructure and Sustainable Transportation; the City’s adopted Vision Zero Goal to eliminate traffic-related deaths and severe injuries by 2030 (Resolution No. 10746 (2016 Series); several goals and policies adopted in the City’s 2021 Active Transportation Plan (ATP) supporting safety improvements for vulnerable road users; and multiple goals and policies adopted in the General Plan Circulation Element, including overarching Transportation Goal 1.6.1.3 to “provide a system of streets that are well-maintained and safe for all forms of transportation.”

DISCUSSION
Vision Zero Background
Motor vehicle crashes are one of the leading causes of death in the United States, with more than 40,000 people killed annually, a notably higher rate than experienced in most other peer countries. This concerning trend is mirrored locally, with 19 community members killed on City of San Luis Obispo streets between 2020-20242 alone, the highest five-year total since the city began formally monitoring collision trends over three decades ago. While the City has been effective at reducing overall traffic collisions by nearly 60% over the past two decades through its ongoing Traffic Safety Program, further action is needed to prevent the most severe types of collisions – those that result in life-altering injury or death. The San Luis Obispo City Council formally adopted the goal of “Vision Zero” in 2016, affirming that no loss of life or severe injury is acceptable on city roadways (Resolution No. 10746 (2016 Series). The City’s first Vision Zero Action Plan presented herein lays out a comprehensive blueprint of priority actions needed to accomplish this ambitious, yet crucially important goal.

The Vision Zero Action Plan represents an evolution of the City’s traditional Traffic Safety Program and Annual Traffic Safety Report, shifting focus to a more proactive “Safe Systems” approach, with a target of not just reducing overall collisions, but cultivating a more forgiving transportation system where human error and collisions may be inevitable, but catastrophic injury or death is exceedingly rare. If “Vision Zero” is the goal, “Safe Systems” are how to get there. Through use of data-driven analysis, review of proven transportation safety countermeasures, and valuable public input from the community, this Action Plan enables City staff and other stakeholders to more effectively identify common risk factors, target high-risk areas and user behaviors, and prioritize resources towards effective interventions. The graphic below compares the traditional approach to traffic safety to a Vision Zero/Safe Systems approach.

2The collision data presented in the Vision Zero Action Plan primarily reflects the most recently available five-year period (2020-2024). Since the conclusion of the Plan’s 2020-2024 focus period, three victims have been killed in traffic collisions in San Luis Obispo in 2025, and one person has been killed in 2026 as of April 15th.

Item 6b
The 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan is available via a link on the City’s Traffic Safety website, and a Draft Resolution adopting the Plan is provided as Attachment A.

Navigating the Vision Zero Action Plan
The Vision Zero Action Plan is structured into the following sections:
 Executive Summary: Overview of key findings and recommendations.  Chapter 1 – Introduction: Background on Vision Zero and the Plan’s goals and performance measures.
 Chapter 2 – Current Trends: Analysis of traffic safety trends over the most recently available five-year period (2020-2024), identifying where the most severe collisions are occurring, what road users are most directly affected, and what factors contribute to these collisions.
 Chapter 3 – Safer Streets: Introduces the toolbox of engineering safety countermeasures, recommendations for systematic (proactive) street design policies and improvements, and location-specific engineering recommendations to address collision trends on the streets and intersections with the highest concentration of severe collisions (the “High Injury Network”).
 Chapter 4 – Safer People: Public education and enforcement recommendations.  Chapter 5 – Post-Crash Care & Emergency Access: Importance of efficient postcrash medical care and recommendations to support emergency access needs in San Luis Obispo.
 Chapter 6 – Safer Vehicles: Relationship of vehicle design on traffic safety outcomes.
 Appendix A – High Collision Rate (“Hot Spot”) Locations: Street segments and intersections with the highest collision rates, including locations both on and off the designated “High Injury Network”.
 Appendix B – Case Studies on Recently Completed Traffic Safety Projects Current Traffic Safety Trends
The collision data presented in the Vision Zero Action Plan focuses primarily on the most recently available five-year collision data (2020-2024). In that timeframe, there has generally been a flat trend in overall collisions in San Luis Obispo. Pedestrian collisions Source: Vision Zero Network

Item 6b
have remained relatively stable, while bicycle collisions increased slightly in 2024, but remain below historic levels. However, there has been a concerning increase in fatal crashes, with 19 fatalities between 2020 and 2024 alone, an additional 3 fatalities in 2025, and one reported thus far in 2026.

Figure 1: Total Collisions (All Travel Modes)
Figure 2: Fatal Collision Victims (All Travel Modes)
Figure 3: Fatal and Severe Injury Collision Victims (All Travel Modes)

Item 6b
Figure 4: Pedestrian Collisions
Figure 5: Bicycle Collisions
Attachment B includes maps from the Action Plan, showing locations of fatal and severe injury, pedestrian and bicycle collisions.

Key Takeaways from Citywide Collision Trends (2020-2024) Most severe collisions occur on a small number of city streets  80% of fatal and severe injury collisions occur on just 11% of San Luis Obispo roadways (the “High Injury Network”).
 Multi-lane arterial streets with posted speeds ≥ 40 mph make up only 6% of city road miles, but account for 56% of all fatal crashes.

Most traffic deaths involve a victim traveling outside of a motor vehicle  69% of fatal collisions involve a victim traveling on foot or by bicycle, despite only 26% of local trips by city residents made by walking or bicycling.  People traveling by motorcycle or motorized scooter account for 6% of fatal collisions and 18% of combined fatal and severe injury collisions, despite accounting for only 1% of citywide trips.
 The majority (67%) of the City’s Active Transportation Plan (ATP) Tier 1 (highestpriority) Network aligns with the High Injury Network.

Item 6b
3 Figure 6: Fatal Collisions by Mode vs. Percent of Citywide Trips by Mode Unhoused community members are disproportionately killed in traffic  Unhoused persons account for 1.1% of the citywide population but are involved in 25% of fatal traffic crashes.

Speed Kills
 81% of fatal collisions occurred on streets with a speed limit of 35 mph or higher, with prevailing speeds often exceeding the posted limit by 5 to 10 mph.

Impaired driving is a significant problem
 1 in 4 fatal collisions (25%) involved a person driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

Extra vigilance is needed when traveling at night
 44% of fatal collisions occur between sunset and sunrise, despite less than 10% of trips typically occurring during these hours.

The High Injury Network (2020-2024)
The Vision Zero Action Plan identifies the High Injury Network, consisting of approximately 11% of City roadways where a disproportionate share of fatal and severe injury collisions occur (approximately 80%). The Plan recommends focusing the City’s safety resources on these corridors. The table below summarizes the High Injury Network roadways and recent collision statistics on these routes, while Figure includes a map of these roadways.

Table 1: High Injury Network Statistics (2020-2024)
High Injury Network Segment Length
(mi)
Street
Classification
Total
Collisions
Fatal &
Severe
Injury
Collisions
Broad (Upham to City Limits) 3.0 Highway/Arterial 138 10 California/San Luis (Foothill to Johnson) 1.3 Arterial 74 6

3 More information on the 2024 Citywide Household Transportation Survey is available in the Active Transportation Plan 2023 Progress Report Card: 2024 Addendum.

Item 6b
High Injury Network Segment Length
(mi)
Street
Classification
Total
Collisions
Fatal &
Severe
Injury
Collisions
Chorro (Walnut to Marsh) 0.4 Arterial/Collector 48 4
Foothill (City Limits to California) 1.5 Arterial 101 10 Grand (Slack to Monterey) 0.5 Arterial 24 2
Higuera (Marsh to City Limits) 2.6 Arterial 184 13
LOVR (City Limits to Higuera) 2.5 Arterial 161 5
Madonna (Oceanaire to Higuera) 1.0 Arterial 90 2
Monterey (Santa Rosa to Buena Vista) 0.8 Arterial 60 3
Santa Rosa (Highland to Marsh) 1.5 Highway/
Arterial 153 9
Tank Farm (Higuera to City Limits) 0.6 Arterial 20 3
Figure 7: High Injury Network
(See Attachment C for enlarged map)
Vision Zero Action Plan Recommendations
The Vision Zero Action Plan presents priority recommendations to support eliminating traffic-related fatalities and severe injuries, organized around the core Safe Systems elements: safer streets (engineering), safer people (education and enforcement), postcrash care and emergency access, and safer vehicles. Together, these Safe Systems layers create a more forgiving transportation system, often described as the “Swiss

Item 6b
Cheese Model,” that reduces the likelihood that human error leads to fatal or severe injury crashes.

Detailed recommendations for each focus area are provided in the Vision Zero Action Plan. At a high level, the Plan includes strategies that address key trends and risk factors associated with severe collisions, including high-risk road user behaviors, vulnerable road users, and the High Injury Network.

Safer Streets (Engineering) Recommendations
The Plan includes both proactive citywide and location-specific engineering strategies.

The Systematic (Proactive) Engineering Recommendations are a priority set of safety strategies intended to be applied broadly across the City’s roadway system as opportunities and resources allow. They include both (1) policy and planning updates to strengthen the City’s overall transportation framework and (2) engineering solutions that support safer street design. These recommendations focus on integrating proven safety measures into standard City practice, including speed management, pedestrian and bicyclist safety improvements, and enhanced roadway lighting.

The Plan also includes High Injury Network Engineering Recommendations, which outline location-specific engineering strategies for streets and intersections located on the High Injury Network. These recommendations focus on targeted, proven safety improvements at locations with a demonstrated history of collisions. By prioritizing resources on the High Injury Network, the City can make the greatest progress toward eliminating severe collisions.

The High Injury Work substantially overlaps with the City’s Active Transportation Plan (ATP) Tier 1 Network, with 67% of the ATP Tier 1 corridors also included in the High Injury Network (see Attachment D). This overlap highlights the importance of continued investment in and implementation of the Tier 1 Network as a core strategy for advancing the City’s mobility and sustainability goals, as well as achieving Vision Zero.

Item 6b
The Plan also supports the ATP by increasing community awareness of existing lowstress bicycle routes that run parallel to higher-speed arterial streets, particularly those adjacent to the High Injury Network. In addition, the Plan recommends prioritizing implementation of new low-stress bicycle facilities identified in the ATP that provide parallel routes to higher-speed arterial streets. See Attachment E for priority existing and future low-stress bicycle routes parallel to the High Injury Network.

Safer People (Education and Enforcement) Recommendations The Plan recommends targeted education for all road users, including drivers, people walking, people bicycling, focused on correctable high-risk behaviors that contribute to severe collisions, as well as increasing awareness of common risks encountered when navigating the city. It also recognizes populations overrepresented in these collisions, including people walking, bicycling, and unhoused community members. It also recommends focusing enforcement resources on the High Injury Network and the “Focus on the Five”4 key behaviors that contribute to fatal and severe injury collisions. The Plan further recommends seeking additional funding—through increases in City funds and outside grant opportunities, where available—to support increased traffic enforcement resources and dedicated staffing, allowing expanded enforcement, including during nighttime hours where a disproportionate share of severe crashes occur.

Post-Crash Care & Emergency Access
The Plan emphasizes recommendations that support efficient post-crash medical care and improve the likelihood of survival following traffic collisions. These recommendations also support general emergency vehicle response and evacuation needs throughout the City. Notable strategies include expansion of Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption (EVP) systems and efforts to reduce friction on priority emergency response corridors to improve response times. This chapter identifies priority emergency response routes and includes a focused discussion on the project development process for advancing street safety infrastructure projects and the importance of incorporating emergency response and evacuation needs into the project development process. Attachment F includes an excerpt from the Plan illustrating this process.

As discussed in this chapter of the Plan, all Vision Zero projects will be developed in close coordination with Police, Fire, and emergency medical service providers from the earliest stages of project scoping and design.

Emergency response access, evacuation routes, and response time performance are treated as fundamental design criteria alongside traffic safety objectives. Potential conflicts are identified early in the design process and resolved through collaborative review, design refinement, or alternative treatment strategies.

4 “Focus on the Five” is a targeted enforcement initiative addressing the five most common behaviors associated with fatal and serious injury collisions: (1) speeding; (2) impaired or distracted driving; (3) failure to yield to bicyclists or pedestrians while turning; (4) pedestrians and bicyclists entering the roadway or crossing at unsafe locations; and (5) dangerous nighttime driving behaviors.

Item 6b
Emergency response and public safety performance remain a required consideration in all final project approvals.

Safer Vehicles
The Action Plan includes Safer Vehicle recommendations focused primarily on the City’s Legislative Action Platform and advocacy efforts at the state and national level to improve motor vehicle safety and reduce collision severity. An example of this is supporting future updates to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s New Car Assessment Program to consider addition of Intelligent Speed Assistance (ISA) systems as a standard feature in new motor vehicles. ISA systems track a vehicle’s speed and provide feedback to the driver to help ensure compliance with posted speed limits.

Vision Zero Action Plan Implementation Priorities
Projects Already in Progress:

The Vision Zero Action Plan emphasizes the importance of prioritizing City staffing and funding resources on the High Injury Network (HIN). Several corridors within the HIN already have major projects underway in various phases of development that will implement safety improvements recommended in the Action Plan. Staff recommends continuing to advance these safety projects as a top priority:

1. Higuera Complete Street Project (Construction start expected summer 2026)

2. Higuera/Prado Intersection Improvements as part of the Prado Creek Bridge Replacement Project (In design, construction tentatively expected to start as soon as late 2027)

3. California/Taft Roundabout (In final design, construction start late 2026/early 2027 pending right-of-way acquisition)

4. Foothill/California Intersection and Rail Crossing Safety Improvements (In design, potential construction start in 2027, pending railroad and PG&E coordination)

5. South & King Crossing Upgrade (In construction, completion estimated fall 2026)

6. Foothill Complete Street Project (Planning phase underway)

7. South Broad Street Complete Street Project (Planning phase starting summer 2026)

8. Grand Avenue Paving/Complete Street Project (Pilot project monitoring underway, future improvements planned with 2027 Paving Project)
In addition, several smaller-scale safety projects are currently in-progress and planned to be completed by the end of 2026:

1. Higuera/Suburban Traffic Signal Modifications – Add protected-only left-turn phasing and install a “Right Turn Yield to Bike” illuminated sign. (Currently in construction)

2. Broad/Aerovista Left Turn Restrictions (Anticipated installation summer 2026 with 2026 Minor Signing/Striping Project)

3. San Luis Drive minor sign/striping enhancements from California to Johnson (Included with 2026 Roadway Sealing Project, beginning fall 2026)

Item 6b

4. Froom Ranch Way/San Luis Ranch Road Roundabout Pedestrian Crosswalk Beacons (To be installed with planned sign/striping project summer 2026)

5. Pilot Speed Cushion Installations – Pilot installations planned for Mill Street, Augusta Street and Sydney Street (Anticipated installation late 2026/early 2027 following 2026 Roadway Sealing Project)
Staff Recommendations for Project Priorities through Remainder of FY2026-27:

After accounting for funding committed to the above-mentioned projects already in progress, there is $375,935 remaining in available funding for Vision Zero Action Plan implementation through the remainder of the FY2025-27 work program. (See Fiscal Impact Section for funding details).

Vision Zero implementation is dependent on available staffing capacity within the Public Works engineering and construction management/inspection teams, in addition to available funding. Considering available funding and current staffing capacity, staff has identified the following list of recommended short-term Vision Zero projects for prioritization through the remainder of FY2026-27. These project recommendations represent priority systematic and location-specific projects identified in the Action Plan, focusing on the High-Injury Network and advancing measures that can be substantially completed with current staffing and funding resources over the next 12-18 months.

Table 2: Suggested Vision Zero Project Priorities Through FY2026-27 Project Description Cost*
Traffic Signal Modifications on High-Injury Network $130,000 Grand/Monterey
 Protected left-turn phasing on Monterey Street (left
turns only when opposing traffic is stopped)
 Separate signal timing for eastbound and westbound
Grand Avenue / Andrews Street movements
 Bicycle detection push-button at the westbound
approach to improve bike responsiveness
 High-visibility reflective signal backplates to improve signal visibility and nighttime safety
LOVR/Descanso
 Protected-only left-turn phasing (left turns occur only when opposing traffic is fully stopped)
 High-visibility reflective signal backplates to improve signal visibility, especially at night
 Nearside signal heads to improve driver visibility of signal indications at intersections
Tank Farm/Long
 Protected-only left-turn phasing (left turns only occur when opposing traffic is stopped)
 High-visibility reflective signal backplates to improve visibility of signal indications, especially in low-light conditions

Item 6b
Speed Limit
Reductions &
Visibility
Enhancements
Collect new speed surveys and update Engineering &
Traffic Studies to support reduced speed limits along
High-Injury Network and other high-speed arterials,
where permitted per the California Vehicle Code. Install measures to increase awareness and compliance with
posted speed limits. Estimate assumes:
 Updated speed surveys for 20 roadway segments
 Updated speed limit signs and warning flags for 20
locations
 New "XX MPH" speed limit pavement marking at 10
locations
 6 new radar speed feedback signs
$130,000
Traffic Signal
Emergency Vehicle
Preemption
Upgrades
Install emergency vehicle pre-emption equipment at 3
new intersections, with locations prioritized based on
input from SLO Fire and SLO PD.
$90,000
Crosswalk
Daylighting
Install red curb paint and/or signage at crosswalks
pursuant to recent "daylighting" laws, prioritizing
locations near schools, parks, and areas with
pedestrian crash history. Cost estimates assume limited locations will require outside contractor to install, with most locations assumed to be installed by City
maintenance crews.
$5,000
Pedestrian & Bike
Crossing Signage
Install warning/regulatory signage at locations with
crash history and/or with frequent observed conflicts
between turning vehicles and bicycles/pedestrians.

Signage may include "LEFT/RIGHT TURN YIELD TO
PED/BIKE", “NO RIGHT TURN ON RED”**, etc. Cost
assumes static (not electrically illuminated) signs
installed at 10-15 new locations.
$10,000
Total Project Costs $365,000
*Above listed costs are approximate based on preliminary engineer's estimates; final costs may vary and could affect number of these projects that can be implemented within current funding resources. **Locations proposed for right-turn-on-red restrictions will first be evaluated to confirm they do not conflict with the City’s adopted LOS or queuing impact thresholds.

At this time, staff is seeking Council concurrence on the abovementioned project recommendations, which represent a collection of low-to-moderate complexity safety projects that staff believes could be substantially completed with current funding and staffing resources in the short-term horizon (next 12-18 months). Existing Public Works staffing resources and workload are limiting factors with initiating any new major/highcomplexity projects or programs at this time. If the Council would like to share preliminary input on desired safety project priorities for future work programs, they are welcome to at this time; however, note that more opportunities for detailed discussion on future safety projects will be available as part of the 2027-29 Financial Plan development.

Item 6b
Previous Council or Advisory Body Action
The Draft Vision Zero Action Plan was presented to the City’s Active Transportation Committee (ATC) on December 12, 2024. The ATC staff report, which includes more detailed discussion on pedestrian and bicycle safety considerations, can be reviewed here. Key comments provided by the ATC include:

1. Include consideration for implementing and increasing awareness of alternative low-stress pedestrian/bicycle routes parallel to High Injury Network corridors and other high traffic volume/speed roadways as a strategy to improve safety for vulnerable road users.

2. Consider recommendations for increased police enforcement of illegal vehicle window tints as a strategy to improve safety for people walking and bicycling.

3. Include some case studies or additional data on the effectiveness of recent city safety and active transportation projects.

4. Soften recommendations in the Plan regarding enforcement of illegal pedestrian crossings and wrong-way and sidewalk riding by bicyclists. Instead, include considerations to first evaluate if design strategies are feasible to provide safe and legal opportunities to accommodate these walking and bicycling desire lines before prohibiting these behaviors completely.

These recommendations have been incorporated into the Action Plan, and staff plans to present the final adopted Action Plan and short-term priorities to the ATC in summer 2026.

Public Engagement
To supplement quantitative collision data review, staff solicited community input to guide development of the Vision Zero Action Plan analysis and recommendations. Community members shared more than 400 comments on citywide traffic safety observations, concerns and priorities via an online Vision Zero Public Input Map distributed in early 2024. This input often aligned closely with the collision data but also helped identify locations with frequent conflicts or close calls that may not be evident in collision data alone, and provided additional context to help guide the detailed safety recommendations presented in the Plan. While the online input map has been closed to new comments, previous comments remain available for review on the City’s Traffic Safety website and will be used by staff to guide future project planning. Staff intends to re-open the input map to guide future updates to the Vision Zero Action Plan.

Item 6b
Screenshot of Online Vision Zero Input Map
A draft version of the Vision Zero Action Plan was published in early December 2024 for public review, and comments were collected via the Open City Hall platform through January 15, 2025. Where possible and appropriate, these comments have been used to guide the edits to the final draft of the Vision Zero Action Plan. Since this time, the Plan has been updated to incorporate collision data through 2025, refinements based on the ATC’s feedback on the draft Plan, including recommendations to advance low-stress pedestrian and bicycle routes parallel to the High Injury Network (as shown on Attachment E), and additional detail regarding emergency response and evacuation considerations.

Measuring Progress
As currently proposed, it is recommended that the City endeavor to update the comprehensive Vision Zero Action Plan every five years, as resources allow. However, the Plan also recommends that staff continue publishing data on general traffic safety trends and progress updates on priority Vision Zero projects and programs annually. The Action Plan identifies specific performance measures that will be used to track progress towards the City’s Vision Zero goals, with metrics that include 5-year average rates of fatal/severe injury collisions, bicycle and pedestrian collision rates, consistent with the performance measures identified in the ATP. In addition, the Plan recommends that the city create and maintain an online collision dashboard, which provides transparent information to decision-makers and the general public. This collision dashboard is now live and available via the City’s Traffic Safety webpage.

Item 6b
City of San Luis Obispo Online Collision Dashboard

CONCURRENCE
The City Police and Fire Departments have reviewed the Vision Zero Action Plan and concur with its findings and recommendations. Additional details on coordination are provided in the Street Design Review Process Flowchart (Attachment F) and in Chapter 5 (Post-Crash Care & Emergency Access) of the Action Plan, which discuss how the City Public Works, Police, and Fire Departments will continue to address emergency access and evacuation considerations during the planning and design of road safety improvements.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The recommended action is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is an administrative planning document and does not approve any specific construction project. It is not a “project” as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15378.

Any future improvements identified in the Plan will undergo environmental review as required before implementation.

FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: Yes Budget Year: 2025-26, 2026-27
Funding Identified: Yes

Item 6b
Fiscal Analysis:

Funding
Sources
Total Budget
Available
Current
Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing
Cost
General Fund* $318,964 $ $ $
State
Federal
Fees
Other: (TIF) $43,716
Total $362,680 $ $ $
*$250,000 in additional general funds programmed FY2026-27 There is no direct fiscal impact associated with adopting the Vision Zero Action Plan itself, and staff is not requesting appropriation of additional funding with adoption of the Plan at this time.

Currently, there is $362,680 total in existing capital funding to support implementation of the Vision Zero Action Plan5, excluding funding programmed to other major stand-alone capital projects (i.e. California & Taft Roundabout, Foothill Complete Streets, etc.). An additional $250,000 in new funding is programmed for FY2026-27, providing $612,680 in total funding available as of July 1, 2026.
$236,745 of this funding is committed to current safety project priorities already in progress, as described earlier in this report (i.e. contribution to Higuera Complete Streets Construction, Speed Cushion Pilot Project, Higuera/Suburban Minor Traffic Signal Modification).

This leaves $375,935 available for new projects to support Vision Zero Implementation.

The discussion earlier in this report identifies the list priority projects suggested by staff for the remainder of the FY2025-27 work program—as noted previously, staff welcomes Council input on these short-term priorities and potential near- and long-term priorities to consider for future financial planning cycles.

ALTERNATIVES
The Council may choose not to adopt the Vision Zero Action Plan at this time. The Council may choose not to adopt the Vision Zero Action Plan at this time. Council may direct staff to make modifications to the Action Plan or near-term project recommendations and return at a future date for final approval.

ATTACHMENTS
A - Draft Resolution Adopting the 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan B - 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan Collision Maps

5 This includes $224,758 in Account No. 2000073 (Vision Zero Program Implementation) and $137,922 in Account No. 2091607 (Traffic Safety Report Improvements).

Item 6b
C - 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan High Injury Network Map D - High Injury Network Compared to ATP Tier 1 Network Map E - Low-Stress Bicycle Routes Parallel to High Injury Network Map F - Street Design Project Development Process

R ______
RESOLUTION NO. _____ (2026 SERIES)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS

OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO

VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN
WHEREAS, the safety, health, and wellbeing of all persons traveling within the City of San Luis Obispo is a fundamental City priority, and no person should be killed or seriously injured while traveling on City streets; and
WHEREAS, the San Luis Obispo General Plan Circulation Element establishes policy direction to provide a safe, efficient, and multimodal transportation system that supports walking, bicycling, transit, and reduced reliance on single-occupant vehicles; and
WHEREAS, Vision Zero is based on the principle that while human error is inevitable, the transportation system should be designed to anticipate mistakes and prevent them from resulting in severe injury or death; and WHEREAS, the City of San Luis Obispo adopted a Vision Zero policy in October 2016 with the goal of eliminating traffic fatalities and severe injuries by 2030; and WHEREAS, 19 people in the City of San Luis Obispo lost their lives to traffic deaths in between 2020 and 2024 and traffic crashes are among the leading cause of deaths in the United States; and
WHEREAS, the implementation of the measures recommended in the Vision Zero Action Plan will build on the City’s previous Traffic Safety Program and Active Transportation Plan with the overall goal of improving safety for all road users and expanding access to safe, sustainable transportation options; and WHEREAS, adoption of the Vision Zero Action Plan will support the City’s eligibility and competitiveness for Federal and State grant opportunities related to multimodal transportation safety and infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, the Vision Zero Action Plan provides a coordinated set of strategies across of engineering, education and awareness, enforcement, post-crash care, and vehicle safety to reduce severe and fatal collisions and improve overall transportation safety; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the 2026 Vision Zero Action Plan and the recommendations contained therein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:

Resolution No. _____ (2026 Series) Page 2
R ______
SECTION 1. Approval. The City of San Luis Obispo Vision Zero Action Plan is hereby adopted.

SECTION 2. Implementation. City staff are directed to implement the Vision Zero Action Plan within available staffing capacity and budgetary resources, and to return to Council as necessary to advance priority projects and programs.

SECTION 3. Administrative Authority. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to make minor, non-substantive revisions to the Vision Zero Action Plan as necessary to correct errors, clarify intent, or reflect updated data, provided that such changes do not materially alter the policy direction of the Plan.

Upon motion of Council Member ___________, seconded by Council Member ___________, and on the following roll call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

The foregoing resolution was adopted this _____ day of _______________ 2026. ___________________________
Mayor Erica A. Stewart
ATTEST:
______________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________. ___________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk

Broad
Santa Rosa
California
Higuera
Chorro
Cerro Romauldo
South Higuera
Tank Farm
Los Osos Valley
Grand
Monterey
Marsh
Highland
Orcutt
Madonna
Johnson
Nipomo
Islay
Toro
Victoria
Oceanaire
Galleon
Froom Ranch
Mill
Woodbridge
Morro
King
Foothill
Ramona
Broad
Murray
Casa
Dalidio
Fixlini
Flora
¯
NTS
Figure 19: Low-Stress Bicycle Routes Parallel to High Injury Network San Luis Obispo, CA
City Limit
High Injury Network
Low-Stress Bicycle Network - Existing
Low-Stress Bicycle Network - Proposed
Cerro Romauldo
Neighborhood Greenway
Planned Marsh Street
Undercrossing Shared-Use Path
Madonna Road Shared-Use Path
Planned Madonna Road Separated Bikeway
Shared-Use Path (Madonna Inn to Higuera)
Oceanaire Neighborhood Greenway
Bob Jones Trail
Planned Bob Jones Trail Extension
(LOVR to Octagon Barn)
Existing Railroad Safety Trail
(Cal Poly to Mill)
Planned Pepper St Bikeway
Improvements
Existing Downtown
Neighborhood Greenways and
Bike Lanes
Planned Railroad Safety Trail on
West Side of UPRR Tracks (High
Street to McMillan)
Railroad Safety Trail (Orcutt to
Amtrak Station)
Planned Railroad Safety Trail
Extension (Tiburon to Orcutt)
Railroad Safety Trail (Tank Farm
to Tiburon)
Dalidio & Froom Ranch Way
Shared-Use Paths
Planned Bikeway Connection
between Tank Farm and Prado
Woodbridge/Victoria
Neighborhood Greenway
North Chorro
Neighborhood Greenway
2020-2024
Potential Bicycle/Pedestrian
Connection (Ferrini to Boysen)
Flora-Fixlini Neighborhood Greenway
(Southwood to SLO High School)

187
Figure 21: Street Design Project Development Process