San Luis Obispo City Council
September 1, 2026

City Council
AGENDA

Tuesday, September 1, 2026, 5:30 p.m.

Council Chambers, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo
The Agenda has been amended to add an additional Closed Session Item. Closed Session will begin at 4:00 PM.

Council Meetings are now held in a hybrid format, which means participation is allowed both inperson and virtually through teleconference. For a complete list of ways to view/participate in meetings, review the Participation Guide. In person attendees of City Council or Advisory Body meetings are eligible to receive one hour of complementary parking; restrictions apply, visit Parking for Public Meetings for more details.

Agendas and Staff Reports: Agendas and staff reports for regular meetings are commonly posted one week in advance of the meeting date.

Staff Agenda correspondence regarding questions from Council received after the staff reports are published will be posted by 1:00 PM on the day of the meeting.

Contact the City Clerk's Office with questions by emailing [email protected].

ONLINE PARTICIPATION:

Zoom: To join the Regular Meeting, click this link https://slocity.zoomgov.com/j/1659063523 on any computer or mobile device.

Telephone: Call 1-669-254-5252 and enter the Meeting’s ID #165 906 3523 to join by telephone audio only.

Public Comment during the meeting:

In person public comment:

Fill out a speaker card and give it to the City Clerk.

Online public comment:

Use the Zoom “raise your hand” button or telephone call in press *9 on your telephone (*6 to unmute/mute) when the comment period on your item of interest begins. You will be notified when you’ve been unmuted and it’s your turn to speak.:

Public Comment prior to the meeting (must be received 3 hours before the start of the meeting.

Correspondence received before the meeting will not be read aloud during the meeting):

Email - Submit to [email protected]. In the subject line, please include the date of the meeting and the item number (if applicable).

Mail - Address letters to the City Clerk's Office at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California, 93401.

Voicemail - Call (805) 781-7164 and leave a voicemail. Please state and spell your name, the agenda item number, and leave your comment.
*All correspondence will be publicly archived and distributed to councilmembers; however, submissions received after the deadline may not be processed until the following day.

Pages

1. CLOSED SESSION (4:00 PM START)
Please click the link below to join the webinar to provide Public Comment on Closed Session only:
https://slocity.zoomgov.com/j/1657159891
To join by phone dial 1 669 254 5252 Webinar ID: 165 715 9891

1.a CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Erica A. Stewart will call the Closed Session of the San Luis Obispo City Council to order at 4:45 p.m. in the Council Hearing Room of City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo.

1.b PUBLIC COMMENT FOR CLOSED SESSION ITEMS ONLY
Public Comment will only be accepted for items listed on the Closed Session agenda.

1.c CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) and paragraph (1) of subdivision (e) of Section 54956.9. No. of potential cases: One

1.d CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code §54956.8
Property: APN 002-412-016
Agency Robert Hill, Greg Hermann,
Negotiators: Christine Dietrick, Whitney McDonald
Negotiating History Center of San
Parties: Luis Obispo County
Under Price and terms of payment.

Negotiation:

1.e CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code §54956.8
Property: APN 002-352-022
Agency Robert Hill, Greg Hermann,
Negotiators: Christine Dietrick, Whitney McDonald
Negotiating Steven and Gina Nelson
Parties:

Under Price and terms of payment.

Negotiation:

1.f ADJOURNMENT
The City Council will hold a Regular Meeting on September 1, 2026 at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo.

2. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Erica A. Stewart will call the Regular Meeting of the San Luis Obispo City Council to order.

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Council Member Jan Marx will lead the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance.

4. PRESENTATIONS

4.a HUNGER ACTION MONTH PROCLAMATION
Mayor Erica A. Stewart will present a Proclamation declaring September 2026 as Hunger Action Month.

4.b 30TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE SAN LUIS OBISPO GREENBELT
Mayor Erica A. Stewart will present a Proclamation for the 30th Anniversary of the San Luis Obispo Greenbelt.

4.c 30TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
Mayor Erica A. Stewart will present a Proclamation for the 30th Anniversary of the Performing Arts Center.

4.d CITY MANAGER REPORT
Receive a brief report from City Manager Whitney McDonald.

5. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
The Council welcomes your input. State law does not allow the Council to discuss or take action on issues not on the agenda, except that members of the Council or staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising their public testimony rights (Gov. Code sec. 54954.2). Staff may be asked to follow up on such items.

6. CONSENT AGENDA
Matters appearing on the Consent Calendar are expected to be noncontroversial and will be acted upon at one time. A member of the public may request the Council to pull an item for discussion. Pulled items shall be heard at the close of the Consent Agenda unless a majority of the Council chooses another time. The public may comment on any and all items on the Consent Agenda within the three-minute time limit.

Recommendation:

To approve Consent Calendar Items 6a to 6g.

6.a WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL RESOLUTIONS AND

ORDINANCES
Recommendation:

Waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances as appropriate.

6.b MINUTES REVIEW - AUGUST 18, 2026 COUNCIL MINUTES 11 Recommendation:

Approve the minutes of the City Council meeting held on August 18, 2026.

6.c FINAL ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE CLARIFYING APPLICABILITY

OF MHPRSO TO LONG-TERM LEASES AND REQUIRING NOTICES

BY OWNERS
19 Recommendation:

Adopt Ordinance No. 1759 (2026 Series) entitled, “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, Amending Chapter 5.44, Mobile Home Park Rent Stabilization Ordinance, to Apply Restrictions on Space Rent Increase Upon Transfer (5.44.060(C)) to Certain Existing Long-Term Leases and to Require Park
Owners/Operators to Provide Notice to Tenants (5.44.143).”

6.d POLICE DEPARTMENT 2025 ASSEMBLY BILL 481 (MILITARY

EQUIPMENT USE) ANNUAL REPORT
29 Recommendation:

Adopt a draft Resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, accepting the 2025 Military Equipment Use (AB 481) Annual Report and
Renewing Ordinance No. 1712 with Findings of Ongoing
Compliance with City Policy and State Law”

1. Receive and file the 2025 Assembly Bill 481 Annual Report Update, and the San Luis Obispo Police Department Military Use Policy 707.

2. 6.e SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TITLE 13, CHAPTER 13.12 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH
UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 17 WITHIN THE PRADO

ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT LIMITS
139
Recommendation:

Adopt Ordinance No. 1758 (2026 Series) entitled, “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, amending Section 13.12.040 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code to Establish a New Underground Utility District 17.”

6.f REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES TO

CONDUCT A CITYWIDE USER FEE STUDY AND PREPARE A

CENTRAL SERVICE COST ALLOCATION PLAN AND LABOR RATES
165
Recommendation:

Authorize staff to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Consulting Services to Conduct a Citywide User Fee Study and Prepare a Central Service Cost Allocation Plan and Labor Rates, and delegate award authority to the City Manager.

6.g APPROVAL OF SLO TRANSIT’S 2026 TRANSIT ASSET

MANAGEMENT PLAN AND CONTINGENCY FLEET PLAN
199
Recommendation:

Adopt a draft Resolution entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, approving San Luis Obispo (SLO) Transit’s 2026 Transit Asset
Management Plan and Contingency Fleet Plan, and authorizing the City Manager to approve future administrative updates to the plans”

1. Authorize SLO Transit’s Accountable Executive, the City Manager, to sign the final version of the 2026 Transit Asset Management Plan; and

2. Authorize SLO Transit’s Accountable Executive, the City Manager, to sign the final version of the Contingency Fleet Plan; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments and future administrative updates to the Plans as necessary to maintain compliance with applicable Federal Transit Administration requirements and to address changing operational conditions.

4. 7. PUBLIC HEARING AND BUSINESS ITEMS

7.a POLICE DEPARTMENT 2025 ANNUAL REPORT (60 MINUTES) 229 Recommendation:

Receive and file the Police Department 2025 Annual Report.

8. LIAISON REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Council Members report on subcommittee assignments, listed below, and other City activities. At this time, any Council Member or the City Manager may ask a question for clarification, make an announcement, or report briefly on their activities. In addition, subject to Council Policies and Procedures, they may provide a reference to staff or other resources for factual information, request staff to report back to the Council at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter or take action to direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. (Gov. Code Sec. 54954.2)
Mayor
Stewart
Vice Mayor
Francis
Council Member
Boswell
Council Member
Marx
Council Member
Shoresman
SLO Council of
Governments
Airport Land Use Community
Action
Partnership
Air Pollution
Control District
CP Campus
Planning
Committee
Regional
Economic Action
Coalition
Nacimiento Water
Project
SLO Climate
Coalition
County Water
Resources
Advisory
Committee
Downtown
Association
Board
CA Men’s
Colony Advisory
Committee
Zone 9 Advisory
Committee
Local Agency
Formation
Commission
Homeless
Services
Oversight
Committee
Performing Arts
Center
Commission
Integrated Waste
Management
Authority
SLO Regional
Transit Authority
Visit SLO
County Advisory
Committee
Central Coast
Clean Energy

9. ADJOURNMENT
The next Regular Meeting of the City Council will be held on September 15, 2026 at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo.

LISTENING ASSISTIVE DEVICES for the hearing impaired - see the Clerk.

The City of San Luis Obispo wishes to make all of its public meetings accessible to the public. Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the City Clerk’s Office at (805) 781-7114 at least 48 hours before the meeting, if possible. Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (805) 781-7410.

City Council meetings are televised live on Charter Channel 20 and the City's YouTube Channel: www.youtube.com/CityofSanLuisObispo. Agenda related writings or documents provided to the City Council are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office located at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, California during normal business hours, and on the City’s website https://www.slocity.org/government/mayor-and-city-council/agendas-andminutes. Persons with questions concerning any agenda item may call the City Clerk’s Office at (805) 781-7114.

1 Council Minutes
August 18, 2026, 5:30 p.m.

Council Chambers, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo
Council Members

Present:

Council Member Mike Boswell, Council Member Jan Marx,
Council Member Michelle Shoresman, Vice Mayor Emily
Francis, Mayor Erica A. Stewart
City Staff Present: City Manager Whitney McDonald, Christine Dietrick, City Attorney, Teresa Purrington, City Clerk
_____________________________________________________________________

1. CLOSED SESSION (4:30 pm START)

1.a CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Stewart called the Closed Session of the San Luis Obispo City Council to order at 4:30 PM with all Council Members present.

1.b PUBLIC COMMENT FOR CLOSED SESSION ITEMS ONLY
Public Comments:

None
---End of Public Comment---

1.c CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—EXISTING LITIGATION
ACTION: City Attorney Christine Dietrick indicated that the Council met in Closed Session regarding existing litigation Paso Robles Tank, Inc vs City of San Luis Obispo. On a motion made by Council Member Boswell and second by Mayor Stewart with a vote of 5-0 authorized defense of the litigation and approved hiring Mike McMahon of Carmel & Naccasha, LLC to defend the city.

1.d CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
ACTION: City Attorney Christine Dietrick indicated that the Council met in Closed Session regarding Labor Negotiations with Agency Negotiators as listed on the agenda. No reportable action was taken.

2 1.e ADJOURNMENT
Closed Session was adjourned at 5:25 PM.

2. CALL TO ORDER
A Regular Meeting of the San Luis Obispo City Council was called to order on August 18. 2026 at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, by Mayor Stewart.

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Vice Mayor Francis led the Council in the Pledge of Allegiance.

4. PRESENTATIONS

4.a CITY MANAGER REPORT
City Manager Whitney McDonald provided a report on upcoming projects.

5. PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Public Comment:

Shawn Harris
Rob Davidson
Craig Kincaid
Barry Price
Angie Kazprzak
--End of Public Comment--

6. CONSENT AGENDA
Mayor Stewart requested that Item 6g nbe pulled from the Consent Agenda.

Public Comment:

None
--End of Public Comment--
Motion By Council Member Shoresman
Second By Vice Mayor Francis
To approve Consent Calendar Items 6a to 6f.

Ayes (5): Council Member Boswell, Council Member Marx, Council Member Shoresman, Vice Mayor Francis, and Mayor Stewart
CARRIED (5 to 0)

3 6.a WAIVE READING IN FULL OF ALL RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances as appropriate.

6.b MINUTES REVIEW - AUGUST 4, 2026 COUNCIL MINUTES
Approve the minutes of the City Council meeting held on August 4, 2026.

6.c ACCEPTANCE OF STATE COASTAL CONSERVANCY GRANT FUNDS

FOR THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO OPEN SPACE WILDFIRE

RESILIENCE PROJECT

1. Adopt Resolution No. 11675 (2026 Series) entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, Approving Acceptance of Grant Funds from the State Coastal Conservancy for the ‘City of San Luis Obispo Open Space Wildfire Resilience Project’”; and

2. Authorize the Mayor to sign the Resolution supporting the partnership between the City of San Luis Obispo and the State Coastal Conservancy (SCC) and delegating authority to the City Manager to accept the grant funds and sign the grant agreement and any other necessary instruments to carry out the terms of the grant; and

3. Appropriate up to $770,000 in grant funds and authorize the Finance Director to amend the budget accordingly.

6.d AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH

FRIENDS OF LA LOMA ADOBE
Authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 1 to Memorandum of Understanding with the Friends of La Loma Adobe in a final form satisfactory to the City Attorney.

6.e AUTHORIZE THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO APPLY FOR AND ACCEPT

GRANT FUNDS IF AWARDED

1. Authorize retroactively the Fire Department to apply for and accept the award, if awarded, from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency
Response (SAFER) Grant in the amount of $3,600,006.67 for firefighter staffing costs; and

2. Authorize retroactively the Fire Department to apply for and accept the award, if awarded, from FEMA Fire Prevention and Safety

4 (FP&S) Grant in the amount of $33,155 for the purchase of investigations equipment; and

3. Authorize retroactively the Fire Department to apply for and accept the award, if awarded, from CALFIRE in the amount of $720,590 for expansion of the wildfire resilience education project; and

4. Authorize the City Manager, or their designee, to execute the grant documents and approve the budget changes necessary to
appropriate the grant amount upon acceptance of the grant award, if awarded.

6.f FY 2026-27 ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CONTROL - OFFICE OF TRAFFIC

SAFETY GRANT APPLICATION

1. Authorize staff to submit a grant application to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, sponsored by the Office of Traffic Safety, in an amount not to exceed $25,000.

2. Adopt Resolution No. 11676 (2026 Series) entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, authorizing a grant application for funding provided through the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control-Office of Traffic Safety through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to increase education and enforcement programs focusing on underage drinking and authorizing the City Manager or Designee to execute all related grant documents”.

3. If the grant is awarded, authorize the City Manager, or the Chief of Police, to execute grant related documents and authorize the Finance Director to make the necessary budget adjustments upon the award of the grant.

6.g RESOLUTION TO SUPPORT NOMINATION OF FIVE CENSUS TRACTS

TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR DESIGNATION IN THE FEDERAL OPPORTUNITY ZONE 2.0 PROGRAM
Motion By Vice Mayor Francis
Second By Council Member Shoresman
Adopt Resolution No. 11677 (2026 Series) entitled, “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, Supporting the Nomination of Eligible Census Tracts Within the City for Designation Under the Federal Opportunity Zone 2.0 Program.”

5 Ayes (5): Council Member Boswell, Council Member Marx, Council Member Shoresman, Vice Mayor Francis, and Mayor Stewart
CARRIED (5 to 0)

7. PUBLIC HEARING AND BUSINESS ITEMS

7.a APPROVAL OF PARTICIPATION IN THE NACIMIENTO WATER
PROJECT 2026 REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS
Public Works & Utilities Director Aaron Floyd and Utilities Business Manager Shane Whittington provided an overview of the staff report and responded to Council questions.

Motion By Mayor Stewart
Second By Council Member Marx

1. Adopt Resolution No. 11678 (2026 Series) titled “Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, in Connection with the Refunding of the 2015 Nacimiento Water Project Revenue Refunding Bonds, Approving Certain Disclosures Regarding the City and Authorizing Certain Actions in Connection with Such Refunding”, and;

2. Approve certain disclosures regarding the City of San Luis Obispo, describing certain demographic, financial, statistical and other information of the City of San Luis Obispo to be included in Appendix A to the Preliminary Official Statement and the Official Statement that will be used by the Underwriter in the marketing and sale of the SLO County Financing Authority (County of San Luis Obispo, California) Nacimiento Water Project Revenue Refunding Bonds, 2026 Series A (the “2026 Revenue Refunding Bonds”); and

3. Authorize the refunding of the SLO County Financing Authority Nacimiento Water Project Revenue Refunding Bonds, 2015 Series A; and

4. Approve the execution and delivery of a Continuing Disclosure Agreement; and

5. Authorize the taking of all necessary actions in connection with such issuance of 2026 Revenue Refunding Bonds.

Ayes (5): Council Member Boswell, Council Member Marx, Council Member Shoresman, Vice Mayor Francis, and Mayor Stewart

6 CARRIED (5 to 0)

7.b INTRODUCE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MOBILE HOME PARK RENT STABILIZATION ORDINANCE, SLOMC CHAPTER 5.44
Deputy City Attorney Sadie Symens provided an in-depth staff report and responded to Council questions.

Public Comments:

Mark Morrison
Nick
---End of Public Comment---
Motion By Council Member Shoresman
Second By Vice Mayor Francis
Introduce Ordinance No. 1759 (2026 Series) entitled, “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, Amending Chapter

5.44, Mobile Home Park Rent Stabilization Ordinance, to apply restrictions on space rent increase upon transfer (5.44.060(C)) to certain existing long-term leases and to require park owners/operators to provide notice to tenants. (5.44.143)”
Ayes (5): Council Member Boswell, Council Member Marx, Council Member Shoresman, Vice Mayor Francis, and Mayor Stewart CARRIED (5 to 0)

8. LIAISON REPORTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Stewart requested that the Council agendize a review and update of the Council's Policies and Procedures. A majority of the Council approved adding this item to the September 15th meeting.

Mayor Stewart left the dais at 7:38 PM
Council Member Marx requested the Council agendize the issue of censure for a future meeting. A majority of Council voted not to agendize the issue of censure.

Mayor Stewart returned to the dais at 7:52 PM.

Mayor Stewart
 Attended the August 5th SLO Council of Governments (SLOCOG) meeting
 Attended the August 7th Cuesta LVN pinning ceremony

7  Judged the August 15th SLO City Farm Games event
 Attended the August 17th Convocation at Cal Poly
Vice Mayor Francis
 Attended the Central Coast Constructions Trades Breakfast Council Member Boswell
 Attended the August 17th Convocation at Cal Poly
Council Member Marx
 Participated in the August 9th Stuff the Bus event
 Attended the August 15th SLO City Farm Games
 Attended the August 17th Convocation at Cal Poly
Council Member Shoresman
 Attended the August 11th Downtown Association Board Meeting  Attended the August 7th Central Coast Construction Trades Breakfast  Attended the Monday Meetup at DeVaule park
 Attended the Convivencia

9. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p.m. The next Regular City Council Meeting is scheduled for September 1, 2026 at 5:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo.
_________________________
APPROVED BY COUNCIL: XX/XX/202X

Item 6c
Department: Attorney
Cost Center: 1501
For Agenda of: 9/1/2026
Placement: Consent
Estimated Time: N/A
FROM: Christine Dietrick, City Attorney
Prepared By: Sadie Symens, Deputy City Attorney
SUBJECT: FINAL ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE CLARIFYING APPLICABILITY OF

MHPRSO TO LONG-TERM LEASES AND REQUIRING NOTICES BY
OWNERS

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Ordinance No. 1759 (2026 Series) entitled, “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, Amending Chapter 5.44, Mobile Home Park Rent Stabilization Ordinance, to Apply Restrictions on Space Rent Increase Upon Transfer (5.44.060(C)) to Certain Existing Long-Term Leases and to Require Park Owners/Operators to Provide Notice to Tenants (5.44.143).”

POLICY CONTEXT
Chapter 5.44 of the City’s Municipal Code regulates maximum space rent increases in mobile home parks. Until January 1, 2025, state law required local ordinances to exempt long-term leases from their mobile home rent control ordinances. As permitted by Assembly Bill 2782, the City removed the long-term lease exemption from its Mobile Home Park Rent Stabilization Ordinance (MHPRSO) on June 2, 2026, with the ordinance becoming effective July 2, 2026. (Ordinance No. 1757 [2026 Series].) On August 18, 2026, the City Council unanimously voted to introduce Ordinance No. 1759 which clarifies the applicability of the MHPRSO to long-term leases that existed before July 2, 2026. The Ordinance also requires mobile home park owners to provide notice to tenants of the terms of, and any changes to, the MHPRSO. The recommended action is a second reading and final adoption of that Ordinance.

DISCUSSION
Background
The City's Mobile Home Park Rent Stabilization Ordinance (MHPRSO), originally adopted in 1981, regulates allowable space rent increases in mobile home parks and has been amended several times, most recently in June 2026. Until recently, state law required local rent stabilization ordinances to exempt long-term mobile home space leases.

Item 6c
However, Assembly Bill 2782 repealed that requirement effective January 1, 2025, allowing local jurisdictions to extend rent stabilization protections to long-term leases.

In response, the City adopted Ordinance No. 1757 on June 2, 2026, effective July 2, 2026, eliminating the long-term lease exemption from the MHPRSO.

Following its adoption, the City received conflicting assertions from representatives of mobile home parks and residents regarding whether the ordinance applied to long-term leases already in effect. Staff determined that a clarifying amendment was appropriate and met with the Council in closed session for direction.

The proposed Ordinance (introduced on August 18th and presented for final adoption today) clarifies that the MHPRSO's limitation on space rent increases upon transfer of ownership of a mobile home (Section 5.44.060(C)) applies to all pre-July 2, 2026 longterm leases that either do not address transfer-related rent increases or permit increases exceeding the MHPRSO’s ten percent limit. This amendment responds to concerns raised by residents who experienced substantial space rent increases upon sale or transfer of their homes, negatively affecting their ability to sell and reducing home values.

The amendment is narrowly tailored to extend these transfer protections while preserving the remaining negotiated terms of existing long-term leases for the remainder of their current terms.

Annual rent increases established under pre-July 2, 2026 long-term leases would remain governed by those agreements. Long-term leases executed on or after July 2, 2026, are subject to all provisions of the MHPRSO under Ordinance No. 1757.

The Ordinance also modifies language in Section 5.44.060(C) regarding increases in space rent upon “vacation” of the space by clarifying that space rent may only be increased to market if the existing mobile home is removed from the space and a new one (with a new owner) moves into that space. Park owners will not be permitted to increase space rent to market rate if an existing mobile home is merely replaced by its current owner.

Finally, the Ordinance requires mobile home park owners to notify all residents of this and all future amendments to the MHPRSO, as well as any other changes in law or policy that affect mobile home park residents.

Further discussion of the above changes can be found in the 8/18/2026 Council agenda report here.

Previous Council or Advisory Body Action
On May 5, 2026, the Council introduced an ordinance amending Chapter 5.44 to remove the long-term lease exemption from the MHPRSO prospectively. On June 2, 2026, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 1757 removing that exemption.

Item 6c
On June 16, 2026, and on July 21, 2026, the Council met in closed session with the City Attorney regarding anticipated litigation arising from communications from both park owners and resident advocates.

On August 18, 2026, the City Council unanimously voted to introduce Ordinance No. 1759.

Public Engagement
The public had an opportunity to comment at the public hearing introducing Ordinance No. 1759 on August 18, 2026. Notice of that public hearing was published as required by law. The public may also provide comments on the recommended action both before and during this meeting.

Notices were sent on July 8, 2026, to all owners and operators (as registered with the CA Department of Housing & Community Development) of mobile home parks within the City regarding the passage of Ordinance No. 1757. The Notice advised that any further changes to the MHPRSO will be duly noticed for introduction and final adoption by the City Council.

CONCURRENCE
The Community Development Department concurs with the recommendation.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The recommended action is not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act, as it does not have any foreseeable impact on the environment, and it is therefore exempt from environmental review.

FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: No Budget Year: 2026-2027
Funding Identified: No
Fiscal Analysis:

Funding
Sources
Total Budget
Available
Current
Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing
Cost
General Fund $ $ $ $
State
Federal
Fees
Other:

Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0

Item 6c
There is no immediate fiscal impact anticipated, but subsequent investigation of alleged violations and/or enforcement action will require significant staff resource in the City Attorney and/or Community Development Department. Litigation challenging Council action would result in significant legal defense costs and reallocation of City Attorney’s Office staff resources potentially totalling tens of thousands of dollars, even if the City were to prevail, as would be expected.

Partial expansion of the MHPRSO to existing long-term leases may affect the workload of Code Enforcement officers and Administrative Hearing Officers if enforcement action is taken against park owners, but such potential impact is difficult to estimate.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Continue the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance. A vote by the Council to continue consideration of the introduced Ordinance should include direction for staff on pertinent issues that should be further analyzed for Council consideration.

2. Do not adopt the introduced Ordinance. This would leave the MHPRSO in effect as modified by Ordinance No. 1757, meaning removal of the long-term lease exemption affects only leases executed on or after July 2, 2026. Not adopting the introduced Ordinance will likely result in continued ambiguity as to the applicability of the MHPRSO to long-term leases that existed before July 2, 2026, and may also negatively impact existing mobile home park residents wishing to sell their mobile homes. It would also leave rent increases upon “vacation” of a space open to unintended interpretations by park owners.

3. Modify the introduced Ordinance. Should Council wish to make substantive, nonclerical modifications to the Ordinance, it would need to be re-introduced at a subsequent, duly-noticed public hearing. This delay in implementation may lead to further confusion over the applicability of the MHPRSO to existing long-term leases and negatively impact existing mobile home park residents wishing to sell their mobile homes.

ATTACHMENTS
A - Ordinance No. 1759 (2026 Series)

O ______
ORDINANCE NO. 1759 (2026 SERIES)

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 5.44, MOBILE HOME

PARK RENT STABILIZATION ORDINANCE, TO APPLY RESTRICTIONS ON SPACE RENT INCREASE UPON TRANSFER (5.44.060(C)) TO

CERTAIN EXISTING LONG-TERM LEASES AND TO REQUIRE PARK
OWNERS/OPERATORS TO PROVIDE NOTICE TO TENANTS (5.44.143) WHEREAS, the City’s municipal code, Chapter 5.44 (known as the Mobile Home Rent Stabilization Ordinance [MHPRSO]), limits the maximum amount a mobile home park operator may increase space rent within a mobile home park annually and upon transfer of ownership of a mobile home; and
WHEREAS, prior to July 2, 2026, long-term leases were excluded from the protections of the MHPRSO pursuant to the City’s ordinance and as previously required by state law (former Civil Code § 798.17); and
WHEREAS, a change in law in 2021 (Assembly Bill 2782) allowed local agencies to remove the long-term lease exemption from their mobile home rent stabilization ordinances; and
WHEREAS, on June 2, 2026, the City Council voted to adopt Ordinance No. 1757 (2026 Series), removing the long-term lease exemption from the MHPRSO, a change which went into effect on July 2, 2026; and
WHEREAS, as adopted, Ordinance No. 1757 only applies to leases executed on or after July 2, 2026;
WHEREAS, residency in mobile home parks provides one of few affordable housing options within the City;
WHEREAS, unlimited space rent increases upon change in ownership of a mobile home make it more difficult for tenants in mobile home parks wishing to sell their mobile home to find buyers and/or may diminish or deprive homeowners of the investment in their mobile homes by suppressing the sales value of mobilehome units sold in place, while effectively transferring value to park owners; and
WHEREAS, unlimited space rent increases upon change in ownership of a mobile home erode the supply of affordable housing options for prospective buyers by significantly increasing the overall costs to purchase and occupy a mobile home if the space rent increase upon sale or transfer is unpredictable and/or unlimited; and WHEREAS, the City has a substantial interest in preventing the rapid erosion of affordable housing provided by mobile home parks that results from unlimited increases of space rent upon sale or transfer of a mobilehome in place, and in protecting mobile

Ordinance No. 1759 (2026 Series) Page 2
O 1759
homeowners wishing to sell their mobile homes from unlimited space rent increases upon sale that diminish or transfer the value of their investments in their units to mobilehome park owners and discourage investments in the maintenance of safe mobilehome units in the City .

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:

SECTION 1. Findings. The Council hereby finds and declares the following:

1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference as the findings of the City Council.

2. The City reiterates and herein incorporates by reference its findings codified in Section 5.44.010 (Purpose and Intent) of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code.

3. The City has received complaints from mobile home residents within the City wishing to sell their mobile homes that the park owner/operator intends to increase their space rent by two hundred percent or more and City staff have verified these claims through review of notifications of space rent increase upon sale.

4. Absent regulation by the City, tenancies exempted from the MHPRSO under Section 5.44.030 are not afforded the protection against unlimited space rent upon transfer of ownership under Section 5.44.060(C), which limits such increases to no more than ten percent (10%) of the prior space rent.

5. The City has a substantial interest in protecting and preserving the long-term availability and affordability of tenancies in mobilehome parks, and in protecting mobilehome park tenants who must sell their homes in place against the loss or significant diminution of their investments in their mobilehomes resulting from exorbitant increases in space rent upon sale or transfer of their homes.

6. The allowable increases in space rent upon transfer permitted herein are intended to and do provide landlords with reasonable returns on investments in local mobilehome parks.

7. The Council has considered various options to advance its interests set forth herein and has determined that the Ordinance herein is narrowly tailored to advance the City’s substantial interests.

SECTION 2. Chapter 5.44, Mobile Home Park Rent Stabilization, of the Municipal Code is amended by adding Subsection (F) to Section 5.44.030 as follows:

5.44.030 Exemptions.

The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to the following tenancies in mobile home parks:

A. Mobile home park spaces rented for nonresidential uses; B. Mobile home parks managed or operated by the United States Government, the state of California, or the county of San Luis Obispo;

Ordinance No. 1759 (2026 Series) Page 3
O 1759
C. Tenancies which do not exceed an occupancy of twenty days and which do not contemplate an occupancy of more than twenty days;
D. Tenancies for which any federal or state law or regulation specifically prohibits rent regulation;
E. Spaces in a mobile home park which sells lots for factory-built or manufactured housing, or which provides condominium ownership of such lots, but only when the dwelling unit and the underlying interest in the space it is located upon are in the same ownership.

F. Tenancies entered into before July 2, 2026, covered by leases or contracts that provide for a tenancy of more than one year (“long-term tenancy”), except as provided in Section 5.44.060(C).

SECTION 3: Chapter 5.44, Mobile Home Park Rent Stabilization, of the Municipal Code is amended by modifying Subsection (C) of Section 5.44.060 as follows:

C. The maximum monthly space rent of a tenant may be increased by the owner when there is a change of ownership affecting a mobile home. However, such increase shall not exceed ten percent of the then existing space rent and may not be relied upon any more often than once in any thirty-six-month period as the basis to increase rent. In the event of change of ownership resulting from subletting of the mobile home space as may be allowed by state law, should such become state law, then upon any such subletting the space rent may be increased up to ten percent of the then existing space rent. In the event of removal of the mobilehome from the space and termination/abandonment of the space lease, the space rent may be adjusted to fair market rent in the community. For clarity, replacement of a unit by an existing tenant who is continuing their residency within the park does not constitute removal of a mobile home for the purpose of a rent adjustment contemplated by this paragraph. Nothing in this paragraph shall preclude an adjustment as may otherwise be provided for in this chapter.

Notwithstanding the exemption for long-term tenancies that existed prior to July 2, 2026, as set forth in Section 5.44.030(F), such tenancies that are subject to leases or contracts that either: 1) do not expressly address or limit the allowable increase in space rent upon sale, transfer, or any other change of ownership of the mobile home, or 2) that expressly allow increases in space rent upon sale, transfer, or any other change of ownership of the mobile home, at a rate above ten percent (10%), are subject to this Subsection (C.)
SECTION 4: Chapter 5.44, Mobile Home Park Rent Stabilization, of the Municipal Code is amended by adding a new section 5.44.143 as follows:

5.44.143 Required notices by park owners
A. Initial Notice. Prior to execution of any agreement for a tenancy within a mobile home park, the owner or operator of a mobile home park shall provide each homeowner and tenant with a copy of this Chapter.

Ordinance No. 1759 (2026 Series) Page 4
O 1759
B. Notice of Amendments. Following notice by the City to a mobile home park owner or operator and within thirty (30) days of adoption of Ordinance No. 1759, or any subsequently noticed amendment to this Chapter, the owner or operator shall provide written notice of the amendment to each homeowner and tenant. Such notice shall be provided within thirty (30) days after any amendment becomes effective.

C. Other Notices. Whenever directed in writing by the City, the owner or operator shall provide written notice of any matter affecting mobile home park tenants, including but not limited to a change in law or a new or amended rule, policy, regulation or land use. Such notice shall be provided within thirty (35) days of mailing of such direction by the City.

D. Method of Notice. Notice as required by subsection (B) or subsection (C) shall be deemed sufficient if it is:

1. Delivered personally to the homeowner or tenant, with a proof of service;

2. Mailed by first-class mail to the address of the mobile home space, with a proof of service;

3. Electronically transmitted, if the homeowner or tenant has consented to receive notices electronically; and

4. Posted in a conspicuous location accessible to all homeowners and tenants within the mobile home park; posting shall supplement, and not replace, individual notice.

E. Violation. Failure to provide any notices required in this Section within the time periods and by the methods set forth herein shall be a violation of this Chapter subject to the provisions set forth in Chapter 1.12 and Chapter 1.24.

SECTION 5. Publication. Within fifteen (15) days after its passage, the city clerk shall cause a summary of this ordinance to be published at least once, with the names of those city council members voting for and against the ordinance, in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the city.

SECTION 6. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such provision shall be considered a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity and enforceability of the other provisions of this Ordinance.
///
///

Ordinance No. 1759 (2026 Series) Page 5
O 1759
INTRODUCED on the 18th day of August, 2026, and finally ADOPTED on the 1st day of September, 2026, by the Council of the City of San Luis, on the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
_______________________________
Mayor Erica A. Stewart
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________________
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, this ______ day of ______________, 2026. ______________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk

City of San Luis Obispo, Council Memorandum
City of San Luis Obispo
Council Agenda Correspondence
DATE: September 1, 2026
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Rick Scott, Chief of Police
Prepared By: Brian Amoroso, Deputy Chief
VIA: Whitney McDonald, City Manager
SUBJECT: ITEM #6d – POLICE DEPARTMENT 2025 ASSEMBLY BILL 481 (MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE) ANNUAL REPORT
Staff received the following questions regarding the purchase of two drones to add to department inventory. The questions are below with staff’s response shown in italics:

1. One question for you on the military equipment item. The staff report says you propose buying two more drones as back-ups for models you have currently. It also says that they are being requested with Ventures and Contingency funding, “therefore no budgetary approval action is required from Council.” Can you explain what the Ventures and Contingency funding is and why it does not require council approval?
With adoption of the budget each year, the City Council approves the allocation of $200,000 to a "Ventures and Contingencies" (V&C) account which is budgeted in the overall City’s Non-Departmental budget. The Non-Departmental budget accounts for indirect Citywide costs not clearly linked to departmental operating programs or projects and is not "owned" by any department but is managed by the Finance Department. Upon allocation by the City Council as part of annual budget adoption, the City Manager has authority to expend Ventures and Contingencies to address unbudgeted emergent needs throughout the year.

The Police Department previously submitted for V&C funding to purchase the requested drones, which was approved to keep the current drone program adequately equipped. The drones purchased are consistent with the Department’s currently approved drone inventory and were also added to the AB481 report to Council.

ITEM #6d – POLICE DEPARTMENT 2025 ASSEMBLY BILL 481 (MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE) ANNUAL REPORT Page 2

2. Also, can you explain why the various other drones we own cannot be used as suitable back-ups for the DJI Matrice and Avata drones we already have, necessitating the purchase of two more DJI Matrice and Avata models? As the Department has continued to refine and expand our drone program with additional certified pilots and defined use cases, we have become overly reliant on two single drones for most operations, the Matrice and the Avata. The Matrice is the largest and highest quality drone in our inventory. It has the longest flight time, best optics capabilities, and is the only drone that can fly in the rain and elevated wind conditions. During large scale events and tactical incidents, there may be multiple drones flying simultaneously to gain an overall operational picture from multiple angles. Adding a second Matrice to department inventory allows two drones to fly in inclement weather, such as storms and flooding, as well as fire support. A second Matrice also provides redundancy in the case of a crash or some other operational issue preventing use, as well as replacing one Matrice in the air with the second when batteries are depleted and the drone needs to land out of service for a battery replacement.

The Police Department uses a specialized interior drone to clear a residence or building prior to authorized entry to increase the safety of our Officers, bystanders, and suspects. The Avata is a drone specifically made for flying indoors. It is smaller than the rest of the drone fleet and has guards on the propellers which can allow the drone to bump off walls without falling to the ground. When drone pilots fly indoors, they fly solely by the camera, which is extremely technical and can result in the drone hitting something and falling to the ground. In addition, it is common practice for a suspect to actively attempt to disable a drone, but a second Avata drone would allow for a continued search of the premises, instead of being forced to send in Officers before it is safe to do so. This second Avata will also provide needed redundancy in the event of an operational issue with the drone and not leave the department reliant on a single indoor drone for use.

3. Also, separate from these two questions, on page 110 of the packet, under Lexipol Policy number 707, it appears there is an extra word “department.” There was a typo in Lexipol Policy 707, which has been deleted in the Department’s policy database.

4. Is the City required to use the “military equipment” item descriptions as printed?
Government Code § 7070(d)(1) explicitly requires agencies to list “product descriptions from the manufacturer of the military equipment”. The manufacturer descriptions and source photos contained within are referenced via publicly accessible website source citations. The website source citations utilized in this report are for military equipment descriptive purposes only and are not an

ITEM #6d – POLICE DEPARTMENT 2025 ASSEMBLY BILL 481 (MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE) ANNUAL REPORT Page 3
endorsement by the San Luis Obispo Police Department of a particular product or vendor, or marketing claims.)

Item 6d
Department: Police
Cost Center: 8001
For Agenda of: 9/1/2026
Placement: Consent
Estimated Time: N/A
FROM: Rick Scott, Police Chief
Prepared By: Brian Amoroso, Deputy Chief
SUBJECT: POLICE DEPARTMENT 2025 ASSEMBLY BILL 481 (MILITARY

EQUIPMENT USE) ANNUAL REPORT

RECOMMENDATION

1. Adopt a draft Resolution entitled “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, accepting the 2025 Military Equipment Use (AB 481) Annual Report and Renewing Ordinance No. 1712 with Findings of Ongoing Compliance with City Policy and State Law” (Attachment A)

2. Receive and file the 2025 Assembly Bill 481 Annual Report Update (Attachment B), and the San Luis Obispo Police Department Military Use Policy 707 (Attachment C).

POLICY CONTEXT
California State Law, established under AB 481, requires law enforcement agencies to obtain approval of the applicable governing body (Mayor and City Council), by adoption of a military equipment use policy, prior to taking certain actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment, as defined by statute. AB 481 further requires the governing body to annually review the ordinance and vote whether to renew it and to receive an annual military equipment report prepared by the Police Department. If the governing body determines that a type of military equipment identified in the annual report has not complied with the standards for approval set forth in Government Code Section 7071(d), the governing body shall either disapprove a renewal of the authorization for that type of equipment or require modifications to the military equipment use policy in a manner to resolve the lack of compliance. (Cal. Gov. Code § 7071(e).) AB 481 also requires publication of the military equipment use procedure and the annual military equipment report on the Department’s website. The military equipment use report must be posted on the website within 30 days prior to the Council meeting. The Police Department posted the 2025 annual military equipment report on July 30, 2026, on the Police Department website under the link “SB978-Police Policies, Procedures, and Training Materials”, and notified the public via Instagram, Facebook, Next Door, and X on July 30, 2026, that the report was available for public review.

Item 6d
Military equipment use was recorded by the San Luis Obispo Police Department for this report from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025, contemporaneous and in compliance with the timelines associated with the passage of the law and corresponding City Ordinance 1712. The Police Department is returning to Council for an annual review of the Department’s military equipment use and renewal of Ordinance No. 1712 as required by AB 481.

DISCUSSION
Background
Assembly Bill 481, approved by the California Governor on September 30, 2021, mandates that law enforcement agencies receive approval from their governing body (City Council) for the use of military equipment. This approval is given through the adoption of a military equipment use policy, which must be reviewed annually along with an annual report of military equipment used prepared by the Police Department. The policy and annual report must also be published on the department’s website. The San Luis Obispo City Council approved the military equipment use policy, Resolution number 1712 (2022), on April 19, 2022.

Compliance and Reporting
The San Luis Obispo Police Department recorded military equipment use from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025. An inventory count in June 2026 provided up-to-date data for the annual report, which follows the requirements of AB 481 and City Ordinance 1712.

Military Equipment Usage
Assembly Bill 481 defines Military Equipment as various tools and weapons that meet one of the 16-points of definition in the bill. Equipment can meet the criteria of Military Equipment even though it was not procured from the military. Some examples of Military Equipment include drones, armored vehicles, command post vehicles, chemical munitions, and certain caliber weapons and ammunition.

In 2025, military equipment was deployed in 65 incidents out of 34,911 total service calls, constituting approximately 0.19% of all incidents. Deployment examples included:
 Assisting SWAT and other law enforcement agencies with high-risk search warrants
 Safely arresting barricaded suspects
 Conducting area canvases for at-risk missing people and search and rescue operations
 Safely monitoring large-scale public events, including protests, rallies, and holiday celebrations

Item 6d
 Supporting St. Patrick’s Day and Halloween operations  Documenting fatal collisions and major crime scenes
 Assisting other City departments in video documentation for building inspections, hazmat response and fires
 Aiding in the search for suspects who fled the scene
Equipment Deployment Summary
Equipment Type Number of Deployments
Lenco Bearcat Armored Rescue Vehicle 5
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Drone) 64
Robot 4
Mobile Incident Command Vehicle 5
For the detailed report and further information, please refer to Attachment C.

Requested New Equipment
 DJI Matrice ($19,000)
 DJI Avata ($3,500)
The department currently has one DJI Matrice drone and one DJI Avata drone. Both of these drones represent the department’s first choice for flying given their capabilities. The Matrice offers the longest flight times, can fly in inclement weather, and has the highest quality camera of all of the City’s drones. The Avata is a specialized drone for indoor flying, commonly used to clear a residence before Officers enter, increasing safety of Officers, bystanders, and suspects. If these drones are out of service for maintenance or mechanical issues, the department is left without the option to use these drones in their suited applications. Adding one Matrice and one Avata will create redundancy and reduce the likelihood that the department is unable to use the appropriate drone for the given task.

Funding for these drones was secured through Ventures and Contingency funding; therefore, no budgetary approval action is required from Council. Per AB481, Council approval is required for all new military equipment purchases that do not replace existing equipment. Since the Department is seeking to add to and not replace the existing Matrice and Avata drones, Council approval is required.

Previous Council or Advisory Body Action
On May 3, 2022, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1712, approving and adopting San Luis Obispo Police Department Policy No. 707 (military equipment use policy,

Item 6d
Attachment C.) On June 20, 2023, the City Council received and filed the 2022 Police Department Crime Report and Military Equipment Use Annual Report. On August 20, 2024, the City Council received and filed the Police Department’s 2023 Annual Report and AB 481 Update. On September 2, 2025, the City Council received and filed the Police Department’s 2024 Annual Report and AB 481 Update.

Public Engagement
The community is invited to submit comments in writing prior to the meeting regarding this item. In addition, this hearing satisfies the requirements under section Government Code 7071, et seq., and provides the most transparent summary to date of the use and inventory of military equipment as defined under California Law.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to the recommended action in this report, because the action does not constitute a “Project” under CEQA Guidelines Sec. 15378.

FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: Yes Budget Year: 2025-26
Funding Identified: Yes
Fiscal Analysis:

Funding
Sources
Total Budget
Available
Current
Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing
Cost
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0
State
Federal
Fees
Other:

Total $0 $0 $0 $0
There is no direct fiscal impact to the City related to this report. All referenced equipment is included in the Police Department’s budget which is funded through the General Fund’s annual budget appropriation adopted by the City Council. All efforts within the report are covered through the annual program allocations as outlined in the City’s Financial Plan.

ALTERNATIVES
The City Council could decline to adopt the draft Resolution renewing Ordinance No. 1712. If the City Council determines that one or more types of military equipment

Item 6d
identified in the AB 481 Annual Report does not comply with the standards set forth in AB 481, the Council may disapprove renewal of the ordinance or require staff to modify the Policy No. 707. As reflected in the report, the Police Department believes that all military equipment used by the department complies with AB 481/Government Code §7071. Nonapproval of the continued use of military equipment by the department would restrict access to tools used in the performance of law enforcement duties for the security and safety of the City.

ATTACHMENTS
A - Draft Resolution – Resolution 2025 AB481 and Renewal of Ordinance 1712 B - San Luis Obispo Police Department Military Equipment Use Annual Report 2025 AB481
C - San Luis Obispo Police Department Military Use Policy 707

RESOLUTION NO. _____ (2026 Series)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE 2025 MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE (AB 481) ANNUAL REPORT AND RENEWING ORDINANCE NO. 1712 WITH FINDINGS OF

ONGOING COMPLIANCE WITH CITY POLICY AND STATE LAW
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481), approved on September 30, 2021, by Governor Gavin Newsom (codified as Chapter 12.8 of the California Government Code, starting at section 7070), requires all California law enforcement agencies to have a military equipment use policy approved by the agency’s governing body prior to requesting, seeking funding for, acquiring, collaborating with other jurisdictions about the deployment of military equipment, or using military equipment; and WHEREAS, on May 3, 2022, the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo adopted Ordinance No. 1712 (2022 Series) and approved San Luis Obispo Police Department Policy No. 707 as the Department’s Military Equipment Use Policy (Policy No. 707) based on findings of compliance with AB 481; and WHEREAS, Policy No. 707 and AB 481 (codified at Government Code §§ 7071- 7072) require the Police Department to report to the City Council annually on the Department’s use of military equipment; and
WHEREAS, on June 20, 2023, the City Council received and filed the 2022 Police Department Crime Report and Military Equipment Use Annual Report; and WHEREAS, on August 20, 2024, the City Council received and filed the 2023 Police Department Crime Report and Military Equipment Use Annual Report; and WHEREAS, on August 8, 2025, the Police Department posted the 2024 Military Equipment Use Annual Report, on the Police Department website and notified the public that the report was available for public review; and
WHEREAS, on September 2, 2025, the City Council received and filed the 2024 Military Equipment Use Annual Report and the 2024 Police Department Crime Report.

WHEREAS, on July 30, 2026, the Police Department posted the 2025 Military Equipment Use Annual Report, on the Police Department website and notified the public that the report was available for public review; and
WHEREAS, on September 1, 2026, the City Council received the 2025 Military Equipment Use Annual Report, reviewed Policy No. 707, and determined that each type of military equipment identified in the report has complied with all of the standards set forth in Government Code Section 7071(e)(1-2); and

R ________
WHEREAS, the Police Department does not recommend any changes to Policy No. 707; and
WHEREAS, the Police Department seeks authorization from the City Council for use of new or additional military equipment as identified on pages 7-8 the 2025 Military Equipment Use Annual Report and for the reasons stated therein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo that the above is true and that:

SECTION 1. Findings.

1. The above-stated Recitals are adopted and incorporated herein as findings of the City Council.

2. The Police Department’s use of military equipment in 2025 complied with Policy No. 707 and with the requirements of AB 481 found in Government Code § 7071.

3. The Police Department’s use of military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

4. The Police Department’s military equipment use policy will continue to safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.

5. The military equipment requested for use by the Police Department as identified in the 2025 Military Equipment Use Annual Report will either increase the inventory of existing approved military equipment or provide a safer alternative to existing approved military equipment. The equipment will further Policy 707’s objective of officer and civilian safety. The requested equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety.

SECTION 2. Action. The City Council does hereby:

1. Accept the 2025 Military Equipment Annual Report.

2. Determine that the Police Department’s use of military equipment in 2025 complied with Policy No. 707 and applicable state law, including Government Code 7070 et seq.

3. Renew Ordinance No. 1712 (2022 Series), thereby determining that Policy 707 shall remain in effect without change.

4. Authorize the Department’s purchase of requested equipment identified in the 2025 Military Equipment Use Annual Report as New Equipment Acquisition per Government Code § 7072(a)(6) to preserve life and enhance the safety of citizens and officers.

Upon motion of _______________________, seconded by
_______________________, and on the following roll call vote:

AYES:

R ________
NOES:

ABSENT:

The foregoing resolution was adopted this _____ day of _____________________ 2026. ____________________________________
Mayor Erica Stewart
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________________
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, this ______ day of ______________, _________. ______________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk

1 SAN LUIS OBISPO POLICE

DEPARTMENT
Assembly Bill 481
2025 Annual Report
(Government Code § 7072; San Luis Obispo Municipal Code Ordinance 1712)

2 Table of Contents:

Definitions……………………………………………………………….……………………….3
Preface…………………………...………………………………………………………………5
Executive Summary ..…………………..………………………………………………………5
Reporting Requirements………………………………………………………………………..7
Summary of Military Equipment…………………………………………………………….....8 Unmanned Aircraft systems………………………………………………….………………..9
Robots………………………………………….……………………………………………….12
Lenco Bearcat………………………………………………………………………………….13
Mobile Incident Command Vehicle……………………………………………………….….15 Shotgun Breaching and Ammunition………………………………………………….….…16 Patrol Rifles…………………………………………………………………………………….18
SWAT Rifles……………………………………………………………………………………19
Rifle and Pistol Ammunition…..………………………………………………………………24 Diversionary Devices………………………………………………………………….………29
Chemical Agent and Smoke Canisters……………………………………………………...31 40mm Launchers……………….……………………………………………………………...38
40mm Munitions……………………………………………………………………………….40
PepperBall Launchers and Munitions…………………………………..…………………...43 Defense Logistics Disposition (formerly DRMO) Equipment.………..…………………...46 Appendix A Military Equipment Deployment…………………………………….………….50 Appendix B Military Equipment Quantities….……………………………………….……...55 Appendix C Fiscal Impact…………………………...…………..……………………………65

3 Definitions:

Pursuant to AB-481, the following definitions are applicable only to the Department’s current military equipment inventory and potential future military equipment acquisitions for operational needs. (For a more detailed list, refer to Government Code section 7070, for “military equipment” as defined within the Assembly Bill.) “Governing body” means the San Luis Obispo City Council and Mayor. “Military equipment” means the following:

1. Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. This definition applies to the Department’s inventory of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) and SWAT robot.

2. Armored personnel carriers. However, police versions of standard consumer vehicles are specifically excluded from this definition. This definition applies to the San Luis Obispo Police Department’s Lenco Bearcat.

3. Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. This definition applies to all the Department’s inventory of command and control vehicles, including but not limited to the following:
a) Mobile Incident Command Vehicle (MCV)

4. Battering rams, slugs, and other breaching apparatuses. However, items designed to remove a lock, such as bolt cutters, or a handheld ram designed to be operated by one person, are specifically excluded from this definition. This definition applies to all the Department’s inventory of breaching shotguns, and breaching shotgun rounds, which are all maintained by the SWAT unit.

5. Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including assault weapons as defined in Sections 30510 and 30515 of the Penal Code, except for standard issue service weapons and ammunition of less than .50 caliber that are issued to sworn members. This definition applies to all the Department’s inventory of rifle caliber carbines, sniper rifles, and associated ammunition.

6. Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles.

7. “Flashbang” grenades and explosive breaching tools, “tear gas,” and “pepper balls,” excluding standard, service-issued handheld OC. This definition applies to all the Department’s inventory of flashbangs, pepper ball launchers and related ammunition.

Additionally, this definition applies to all the Department’s inventory of various chemical agents and chemical agent delivery systems maintained by the SWAT Unit and Mobile Field Force. These delivery systems are capable of dispersing chemical agents via burning, expulsion, liquid, or fog.

4 8. The following projectile launch platforms and their associated munitions: 40mm projectile launchers and Pepperball launchers. This definition applies to all the Department’s inventory of 40 mm projectile launchers and associated munitions. This definition also applies to the Department’s inventory of Pepperball launchers and associated munitions.

9. “Military equipment” does not include general equipment not designated as prohibited or controlled by the Federal Defense Logistics Agency.
“Military equipment use policy” refers to the San Luis Obispo Police Department Policy 707 which requires a publicly released, written document governing the use of military equipment by the department that addresses, at a minimum, the following:

1. A description of each type of military equipment, the quantity sought, its capabilities, expected lifespan, and product descriptions from the manufacturer of the military equipment.

2. The purposes and authorized uses for which the Department proposes to use each type of military equipment.

3. The fiscal impact of each type of military equipment, including the initial costs of obtaining the equipment and estimated annual costs of maintaining the equipment.

4. The legal and procedural rules that govern each authorized use.

5. The training, including any course required by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, that must be completed before any sworn member is allowed to use each specific type of military equipment to ensure the full protection of the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties and full adherence to the military equipment use policy.

6.The mechanisms to ensure compliance with the military equipment use policy, including which independent persons or entities have oversight authority, and, if applicable, what legally enforceable sanctions are put in place for violations of policy, the procedures by which members of the public may register complaints or concerns or submit questions about the use of each specific type of military equipment, and how the Department will ensure that each complaint, concern, or question receives a response in a timely manner.

5 Preface:

The San Luis Obispo Police Department retains and utilizes a wide variety of equipment which falls under the definition of AB-481. This equipment is used to assist the San Luis Obispo Police Department in its ultimate mission which is the preservation of life.

The San Luis Obispo Police Department recognizes critical incidents are unpredictable and dynamic in nature. The retention of this equipment alone also does not warrant its use for every incident. The equipment listed in this report assists with the safe and swift resolution of these incidents.

Policy and procedure dictate when the equipment may be deployed in the field, how it may be used, and which officers are authorized to use it. However not all situations can be predicted. The need for the incident commander, on-scene supervisor, or officers to deploy and utilize the equipment in a manner not outlined within policy or procedure may be necessary for the preservation of life in a rapidly evolving incident.

Further, incident commanders, supervisors, officers, and specific specialized units can authorize use of equipment for each specific incident based on the totality of the circumstances.

Executive Summary:

On September 30, 2021, the Governor of the State of California approved AB-481 requiring law enforcement agencies to obtain approval of the applicable governing body (Mayor and City Council), by adoption of a military equipment use policy. The Department is required to seek City Council approval of their military equipment use procedure by ordinance at a regular open meeting prior to taking certain actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment, as defined.

The bill allows the governing body to approve the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment within its jurisdiction only if it determines that the military equipment meets specified standards. The ordinance is subject to the annual City Council review to determine whether, based on an annual military equipment report, the standards set forth in the approving ordinance have been met. The City Council may renew the authorizing ordinance, disapprove authorization for military equipment where standards have not been met, or require modifications to the military equipment use procedure to address any non-compliance with standards.

Finally, the bill requires publication of the military equipment use procedure and the annual military equipment report on the Department’s website. The military equipment use procedure must be posted on the website within 30 days of the Council meeting.

Military equipment use was recorded by the San Luis Obispo Police Department for this report from January 1, 2025, to December 31, 2025, contemporaneous and in compliance with the timelines associated with the passage of the AB-481 and

6 corresponding City Ordinance 1712. An inventory count was conducted in June 2026 to represent the current number of items on-hand as close as possible to the presentation of the annual report.

Summary of Use and Purpose of Use per Government Code § 7072(a)(1):

The military equipment listed on the table below was deployed operationally during the reporting period. Multiple pieces of military equipment may be deployed on the same incident.

Military equipment was used by department members to search for suspects who fled the scene, assist SWAT and other Law Enforcement agencies to execute high-risk search warrants, to safely make arrests of barricaded suspects, conduct area canvasses for at-risk missing persons, gathering an overhead public safety view during large scale public events including protests and rallies and large-scale holiday celebrations, documented the scene of fatal collisions and major crime scenes, and assisted other city departments in documenting fire damage, and building inspections.

Military equipment was deployed on 65 total incidents (some incidents have multiple types of equipment deployed) during the reporting period. During that time, the department responded to 34,911 calls for service incidents per the department’s CAD/Records Management System. Military equipment was deployed operationally on approximately 0.18% of incidents the police department responded to.

Equipment Type Number of Deployments
Lenco Bearcat Armored Rescue Vehicle 5
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Drone) 64
40mm Launcher with Less Lethal Rounds 0
Pepperball Deployment 0
Robot 4
Mobile Incident Command Vehicle 5
Breaching Shotgun and Ammunition 0
Rifles 0
Noise Flash Diversionary Device (NFDD) 0
Chemical Agents 0
Refer to Appendix A for deployment information.

Summary of Complaints per Government Code § 7072(a)(2):

The department received no complaints regarding the use of military equipment during this reporting period.

7 Summary of Internal Audits or Policy Violations per Government Code § 7072(a)(3):

No policy violations were noted related to military equipment deployment internally or by citizen complaints.

Refer to Appendix B for audit information.

Quantity Possessed per Government Code § 7072(a)(5):

Refer to Appendix B
Summary of Annual Cost of Military Equipment per Government Code § 7072(a)(4):

Refer to Appendix C for annual cost information.

New Equipment Acquisition per Government Code § 7072(a)(6):

The department is seeking to purchase the following new items to add to our existing military equipment inventory:

One DJI Matrice Drone ($19,000)
One DJI Avata Drone ($3,500)
The department currently has one DJI Matrice drone and one DJI Avata drone. Both of these drones represent the preferred choice for flying given their capabilities. The Matrice offers the longest flight times, can fly in inclement weather, and has the highest quality camera of all department drones. The Avata is a specialized drone for indoor flying, commonly used to clear a residence before Officers enter, increasing safety of Officers, bystanders, and suspects. If these drones are out of service for maintenance or mechanical issues, the department is left without the option to use these drones in their suited applications. Adding one Matrice and one Avata will create redundancy and reduce the likelihood that the department is unable to use the appropriate drone for the given task.

Reporting Requirements:

AB-481, Section 7072 states the following:
(a) A law enforcement agency that receives approval for a military equipment use policy pursuant to Section 7071 shall submit to the governing body an annual military

8 equipment report for each type of military equipment approved by the governing body within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The law enforcement agency shall also make each annual military equipment report required by this section publicly available on its internet website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The annual military equipment report shall, at a minimum, include the following information for the immediately preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment:
(1) A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use. (2) A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment.
(3) The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response. (4) The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report. (5) The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment. (6) If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment. (b) Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing an annual military equipment report pursuant to this section, the law enforcement agency shall hold at least one wellpublicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the general public may discuss and ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and the law enforcement agency’s funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment
In addition to maintaining the highest levels of public safety, the San Luis Obispo Police Department is committed to transparency, public trust, community partnerships, and compliance with the law. As such, the Department has authored the following 2025 Annual Military Equipment Report in accordance with annual reporting requirements set forth in AB-481 and Government Code 7072.

Summary of Military Equipment:

The inventory of military equipment, particularly consumable material (ammunition, diversionary devices, Less Lethal Impact Weapon – LLIM, etc.) fluctuates regularly. This is based on a variety of factors including but not limited to operational usage, operational deterioration, training, maintenance, and expiration and replenishment guidelines. The San Luis Obispo Police Department is committed to transparency in

9 disclosing its military equipment inventory and related information to our community and elected officials in compliance with the law. The Department strives to provide the most accurate military equipment inventory and information at the time of this report’s publication.
(*NOTE: Government Code § 7070(d)(1) explicitly requires agencies to list “product descriptions from the manufacturer of the military equipment”. The manufacturer descriptions and source photos contained within are referenced via publicly accessible website source citations. The website source citations utilized in this report are for military equipment descriptive purposes only and are not an endorsement by the San Luis Obispo Police Department of a particular product or vendor, or marketing claims.) The following are the various types, descriptions, and guidelines for usage of military equipment currently employed by the San Luis Obispo Police Department:

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS):

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS): An unmanned aircraft of any type that is capable of sustaining directed flight, whether pre-programmed or remotely controlled, and all the supporting or attached systems designed for gathering information through imaging, recording or by any other means.

Capability: UAS can support first responders in any hazardous incident which would benefit from an aerial perspective. These uses could include search and rescue, barricaded suspects or high-risk tactical operations, disaster response, and video and photographic documentation of crime scenes.

Usage: The guidelines for the use of UAS are outlined in Lexipol Policy 613 and FAA Regulation 14 CFR Part 107 It is the policy of the San Luis Obispo Police Department to utilize UAS only for law enforcement purposes, and in a manner that respects the privacy of our community pursuant to state and federal law.

Training Requirements: All department UAV operators are licensed by the Federal Aviation Administration for UAS operation. In addition, each operator attends 24-hour POST certified training along with ongoing monthly department training.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: Approximately five (5) years.

The Department currently possesses the following types of UAS:

DJI Mavic Mini (Quantity: See Appendix B)
Manufacturer: DJI

10 Manufacturer Description: Mavic Mini takes power and portability to the next level, offering advanced features in a compact form factor. Intelligent shooting functions and excellent image quality put aerial masterpieces within reach. Safer, smarter flight enables you to up your game while fully enjoying the creative process. (Description and photo Source: https://www.dji.com/mavic-mini) DJI Mavic 2 Enterprise Advanced (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: DJI
Manufacturer Description: Designed to empower a new generation of workers, the Mavic 2 Enterprise is the ultimate expression of a tool that delivers beyond expectation to meet current workplace challenges and future demands. Featuring:
• Visible & Thermal Imagery
• Integrated Radiometric FLIR Thermal Sensor
• Adjustable Parameters for Emissivity & Reflective Surfaces • Multiple Display Modes: FLIR MSX, Infrared & Visible
(Description and photo source: https://www.dji.com/mavic-2- enterprise?site=brandsite&from=nav)
DJI Mavic 3 Enterprise (Quantity: See Appendix B)

11 Manufacturer: DJI
Manufacturer Description: The Mavic 3 Enterprise Series redefines industry standards for small commercial drones. With a mechanical shutter, a 56× zoom camera, and an RTK module for centimeter-level precision, the Mavic 3E brings mapping and mission efficiency to new heights. A thermal version is available for firefighting, search and rescue, inspection, and night operations.
(Description and photo source: https://enterprise.dji.com/mavic-3-enterprise) DJI Matrice 30 Series (Quantity: See Appendix B)
Manufacturer: DJI
Manufacturer Description: The Matrice 30T integrates multiple high-performance sensors into a lightweight and portable body. Equipped with a remote controller designed for enterprise users and the newly upgraded Pilot 2 flight app, to improve the efficiency of drone operations.
(Photo and description source
https://www.dji.com/products/enterprise?site=enterprise&from=nav)

12 DJI Avata (Quantity: See Appendix B)
Manufacturer: DJI
Manufacturer Description: DJI, the world’s leader in civilian drones and creative camera technology, today introduces DJI Avata, a transformational new drone that offers an unparalleled experience of immersive flight. DJI Avata creates a new paradigm for firstperson view (FPV) drone flight, allowing every pilot to race through the skies and feel its astonishing performance, agility, and easy control. Coupled with the new DJI Goggles 2 and the intuitive DJI Motion Controller, DJI Avata delivers a flight experience that was unimaginable until now.
(Photo and description source https://www.dji.com/newsroom/news/dji-unveils-dji-avatathe-ultimate-immersive-drone-experience) Robots:

Robots: An unmanned robot of any type that is capable of being remotely controlled as well as all the supporting or attached systems designed for gathering information through imaging, recording or by any other means.

Capability: Robots can support first responders in any hazardous incident which would benefit from a ground level perspective. These uses could include barricaded suspects or high-risk tactical operations, disaster response, and use in crawl spaces or confined isolated areas to assist in searches for suspects or evidence.

Usage: Robots are generally used by the SWAT team during high-risk operations.

Training requirements: SWAT Officers authorized to operate robots are required to successfully complete a POST Certified SWAT School and are subject to classroom and practical application training in the use of the robots. Additionally, SWAT Officers regularly train on safe robot deployment in a variety of operational settings.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: ICOR Technologies Mini Caliber Robot – 8-10 years Lifespan varies on operational usage and wear.

13 The Department currently possesses the following types of Robots:

ICOR Technologies – Mini Caliber (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: ICOR Technologies
Manufacturer Description: Lightweight, modular and one-man portable, the MiniCALIBER® SWAT and EOD Robot is tested and recommended by the National Tactical Officers Association (NTOA).

Designed for rapid tactical missions, the robot is simple to operate and quick to deploy for searching rooms, hallways, stairwells and confined spaces. With rubber tracks and articulating front and rear flippers, the Mini-CALIBER effortlessly climbs stairs. It also includes an extendible rotating claw arm that simplifies opening door handles. (Description and photo source: MK3 CALIBER® - ICOR Technology - Tactical & Security Robotics Products)
Armored Vehicles:

BearCat: A 4X4, wheeled, armored personnel carrier capable of providing high ballistic protection, cover, limited breaching capability, and transport of officers and/or civilians at critical incidents and high-risk tactical operations.

Capability: BearCat can support first responders in any hazardous, high risk, or critical incident which would benefit from having a vehicle that provides a high level of ballistic protection.

Usage: To be used in response to critical incidents to enhance officer and community safety, improve scene containment and stabilization, rescue of citizens and personnel and assist in resolving critical incidents.

14 Training requirements: The use of the armored vehicle is authorized for officers during critical incidents, based on the circumstances of each individual incident. All sworn officers have access to the BearCat. Armored vehicles shall be used only by officers trained in their deployment and in a manner consistent with department policy and training. It is the policy of the San Luis Obispo Police Department to utilize armored vehicles only for law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to state and federal law.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: Approximately 20 years depending on operational usage and wear. The Department currently possesses the following BearCat:
2004 BearCat – 2 Door Model (Quantity: See Appendix B)
Manufacturer: Lenco Manufacturer Description:

The Lenco BearCat is the standard tactical armored vehicle for special operations units within the US Law Enforcement community. The BearCat has excellent on-road driving characteristics and maneuverability in tight urban settings. The large floor plan seats 8- 10 fully equipped officers with a long list of tactical features only found on the Lenco BearCat line of armored SWAT vehicles for Police and Government. (Description source: https://www.lencoarmor.com/model/bearcat-g2-police-government/ Mobile Incident Command Vehicles (MIC)
Mobile Incident Command Vehicles:

Self-contained command posts are designed to provide the Incident Commander with a mobile base of operation.

15 Capability: As a mobile base of operation, these vehicles contain specialized command, control, and communications equipment to assist with this mission.

Usage: Mobile Command Vehicles are to be utilized as an Incident Command Post for planned or unplanned events, natural disasters, and for SWAT/CNT.

Training requirements: The driver/operator shall receive training in the safe handling of the vehicle on a closed training course. Once the operator has shown competence in vehicle handling, the driver/operator will drive the vehicle throughout the city with an experienced driver.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: No lifespan indicated by manufacturer. Dependent on operational usage and wear.

The Department currently possesses the following Mobile Incident Command Vehicle:

Mobile Incident Command Trailer - (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Pace American
Manufacturer Description: No description available. (Custom build) Breaching Shotguns and Breaching Ammunition:

Breaching Shotguns and Breaching Ammunition: During crisis situations, it may become necessary for a SWAT team to facilitate an entry into a target location. It is critical the point of entry is breached quickly and as safely as possible. A quick and

16 effective breach is one key to a successful tactical mission. In some instances, a breach initiated by a breaching shotgun loaded with specialized breaching rounds may be required to provide an added degree of safety and tactical advantage to accomplish a mission. Specialized Breaching Rounds are frangible and are designed to break into a powder form upon impact with a solid object (i.e., dead bolt lock, door frame, etc.) The Department possesses a limited inventory of Breaching Shotguns and Breaching Shotgun Ammunition. Breaching Shotguns are to be used exclusively by trained members of the SWAT Unit.

Capability: Shotgun breaching, the use of a breaching shotgun to affect a breach, can be an effective option in SWAT Unit tactics. An effective breach is a design where the least amount of breaching shotgun rounds are used and still accomplishes its goal. An effective shotgun breach can defeat fortified doors and locks. Effective breaching techniques allow tactical officers immediate entry with minimal risk to victims, officers, and suspects.

Usage: Breaching shotguns are to be exclusively used by the SWAT Unit. Breaching shotguns are used to breach doors expeditiously and can be used in response to barricaded suspects, hostage rescue incidents, and active shooters. Breaching shotguns are considered firearms and can be utilized as such when operated in accordance with department policy.

Training requirements: SWAT Officers that are trained in the use of breaching shotguns must successfully complete a POST certified SWAT school. Furthermore, SWAT Officers must undergo regular classroom and live fire proficiency training in its application.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan:

Remington 870 Express Shotgun – Fifteen (15) years
Benelli M4 Shotgun – Fifteen (15) years
Royal Arms TESAR-2 Frangible Breaching Ammunition – Five (5) years The Department currently possesses the following breaching shotguns and breaching shotgun ammunition:

Remington 870 Express – modified 12-gauge breaching shotgun (Quantity: See Appendix B)
Manufacturer: Remington
Manufacturer Description:

17 The Remington 870 Police Magnum pump-action shotgun is a rugged 12- gauge with a short, tactical 18” barrel backed by a stout 3” chamber. The all-matte black gun is Parkerized for generalized durability and rust-resistance. Both the pump action fore-end and stock are robust and tough synthetic.

(Description and photo source: https://www.gunbroker.com/Remington-870- Police/search?Keywords=Remington%20870%20Police&s=f)
Benelli M4 –12-gauge semi-automatic shotgun (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Benelli
Manufacturer Description:

Benelli's M4 Tactical is a unique, Auto-Regulating-Gas-Operated (A.R.G.O.) semiautomatic shotgun, upon which the U.S. Marine Corps depends. It comes standard with a picatinny rail and pistol-grip stock. Other features include a fully adjustable ghost-ring aperture rear sight and windage-adjustable front sight. The M4 is now available in a weather-defying Titanium-Cerakote
finish.
(Description and photo source: M4 Tactical Shotguns | Benelli Shotguns and Rifles (benelliusa.com)
TESAR-2 Breaching Shotgun Rounds - Model FE183 (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Royal Arms International
Manufacturer Description: Black Cap 2-3/4” 425 Grain Compressed Copper Frangible 12 Ga Shotgun Slug.
• Slug Material: Copper Powder
• Velocity: 1,525 Ft p/sec -18” Barrel
• Use: For Metal Doors, Locks & Hinges

18 • Defeats: Heavy Locks, Deadbolts and Hinges (Solid Oak – Steel Doors) (Description and photo source: https://royalarms.com/shop/black-cap-420-gr-copperfrangible-12-round-box/) Patrol Rifles:

Patrol Rifles: A semi-automatic shoulder-fired long gun that fires a rifle caliber cartridge. The Department-approved AR-15 style weapon system is designed to fire a .223/5.56 caliber projectile.

Capability: The rifle caliber carbine provides officers the ability to engage hostile suspects at distances generally greater than the effective distance of their handguns.

Additionally, AR-15 rifles offer advantages over handguns, such as increased accuracy potential and the ability to defeat soft body armor but are not appropriate for every situation.

Usage: The usage guidelines for AR-15 rifles are outlined in Lexipol Policy 434. Only Officers who have completed a POST certified course, mandated department training and have qualified are authorized to use a patrol rifle.

Training Requirements: Prior to using a patrol rifle, officers must be certified by POST instructors in the operation of the rifle. Additionally, all officers who operate any rifle are required to pass a range qualification once a year. The training requirements for patrol rifles are outlined in Lexipol Policy 434. It is the policy of the San Luis Obispo Police Department to utilize rifles only for law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to state and federal law regarding the use of force.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan:

Rifles – Fifteen (15) years

19 The Department currently possesses the following patrol rifles:

Colt Carbine AR-15 (Quantity: See Appendix B)
Manufacturer: Colt Manufacturing LLC
Manufacturer Description:

Throughout the world today, Colt's reliability, performance, and accuracy provide our Armed Forces the confidence required to accomplish any mission.

11.5-16” barrels
(Description and source photo: https://www.colt.com/detail-page/colt-le6920-carbine223556-161-301-pmag-mbus-4-pos-stk-blk) SWAT Rifles:

Colt Carbine M4 (Quantity: See Appendix B)
Manufacturer: Colt Manufacturing LLC
Manufacturer Description: Rapid response, maneuverability, and enhanced firepower play a major part in joint and coalition operations in modern warfare. Colt’s M4 Commando carbines epitomize modern warfare’s emphasis on “Get In and Get Out”.

They were designed to exploit firepower capability in confined spaces where lightweight mobility, speed and violence of action rule.

The Commando can be comfortably carried with its 11.5” barrel yet be instantly available to provide the type of firepower required to outmatch combatants. Because it provides full 5.56mm power and accuracy in a very compact sub-machine gun size weapon, the Commando is often chosen over smaller less powerful sub-machine guns.

Regardless of the application, the Colt M4 Commando provides the superior qualities that will enable operators to accomplish an increasingly wide range of combat missions.

20 (Description and source photo: https://www.colt.com/detail-page/commando-556mm115-301) Accuracy International .308 Bolt Acton Rifles:
.308 Bolt Action Rifles: A shoulder-fired rifle with precision optics that fires a .308 Winchester cartridge.

Capability: The .308 Bolt Action rifle provides SWAT Snipers with the ability to engage hostile suspects at great distances with accuracy.

Usage: .308 Bolt Action rifles are to be used exclusively by officers assigned to the SWAT Sniper Team. These rifles are typically deployed with the SWAT Sniper Team during high-risk SWAT operations and special events or instances wherein Sniper overwatch teams are needed.

Training Requirements: SWAT Snipers must successfully complete a POST certified SWAT school. San Luis Obispo Police Department Snipers must also complete a POST certified sniper school and regularly train and qualify with various weapons systems including the .308 Bolt Action rifle to maintain proficiency.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: Accuracy International – Barrel life rated to approximately 5-10 years. No lifespan indicated by the manufacturer. Lifespan varies on operational usage and wear.

The Department currently possesses the following .308 Bolt Action rifles:

Accuracy International - .308 Bolt Action Rifle (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Accuracy International
Manufacturer Description: A bolt-action, high accuracy, long range, scoped rifle that fires a .308 caliber round with precision used by SWAT snipers. Fixed Stock, 16.5”

21 barrel, standard adjustable cheekpiece, fixed butt pad with spacers, pistol grip, flush cup sling attachments points, double chamber stand muzzle break, and 10 round magazines. Manufacturer Description: The AT (Accuracy Tactical) continues the legacy of the combat proven AW308 and takes the AW to new levels. The standard model has a fixed stock with 24 inch, quick change, plain barrel. There are options for color, folding stock, barrels and suppressors and many accessories, which can be added. The AT is ideal for Law Enforcement and civilian users. (Our model is LE only, and features a folding stock and 16.5” barrel)
(Photo and description source: AT308 (accuracyinternational.com) Daniel Defense .308 Semi-Automatic Rifle:
.308 Semi-Auto Rifle: A shoulder-fired rifle with precision optics that fires a .308 Winchester cartridge.

Capability: The .308 semi-auto rifle provides SWAT Snipers with the ability to engage hostile suspects at great distances with accuracy.

Usage: .308 rifles are to be used exclusively by officers assigned to the SWAT Sniper Team. These rifles are typically deployed with the SWAT Sniper Team during high-risk SWAT operations and special events or instances wherein Sniper overwatch teams are needed.

Training Requirements: SWAT Snipers must successfully complete a POST certified SWAT school. San Luis Obispo Police Department Snipers must also complete a POST certified sniper school and regularly train and qualify with various weapons systems including the .308 rifle to maintain proficiency.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C

22 Lifespan: Daniel Defense – Barrel life rated to approximately 5-10 years. No lifespan indicated by the manufacturer. Lifespan varies on operational usage and wear.

The Department currently possesses the following .308 semi-auto rifles:

Daniel Defense - .308 semi-auto Rifle (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Daniel Defense
Manufacturer Description: The DD5 V4, chambered in either 6.5 Creedmoor or

7.62x51mm NATO, provides users of the Daniel Defense semi-automatic platform even greater long-range precision shooting capability. This highly accurate and durable rifle includes an adjustable gas block that allows for a consistent feel whether shooting suppressed or unsuppressed. The perfected bolt carrier group reduces overall recoil impulse and is easy to maintain and operate in all conditions. (Photo and description source: Daniel Defense, AR-10, DD5 V4, 7.62 | Daniel Defense) Barrett .50 Caliber Semi-Automatic Rifle:
.50 Semi-Auto Rifle: A shoulder-fired rifle with precision optics that fires a .50 Barrett cartridge.

Capability: The .50 semi-auto rifle provides SWAT Snipers with the ability to disable vehicles.

Usage: .50 caliber rifles are to be used exclusively by officers assigned to the SWAT Sniper Team. These rifles are used for disabling a vehicle in incidents where lethal force is justified, and no other reasonable means exist to stop the vehicle to protect innocent life.

Training Requirements: SWAT Snipers must successfully complete a POST certified SWAT school. San Luis Obispo Police Department Snipers must also complete a POST certified sniper school and regularly train and qualify with various weapons systems including the .50 caliber rifle to maintain proficiency.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C

23 Lifespan: Barrett 82A1M – Fifteen (15) years
The Department currently possesses the following .50 caliber semi-auto rifles:

Barrett - .50 semi-auto Rifle (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Barrett
Manufacturer Description: Engineered as the first shoulder fired semi-automatic 50 BMG rifle, the Model 82A1 has been proven in combat in every environment from the snow covered mountains, to the desolate deserts, and everything in between. Its low felt recoil and reliable repower delivers on target with every pull of the trigger. More than just a rifle, the Model 82 is an American icon.
(Photo and description source: Model 82A1® - Barrett Firearms) Heckler and Koch MP5:
9mm SMG: A shoulder-fired submachine gun with precision optics that fires a 9mm round.

Capability: The MP5 has a barrel that is longer than a pistol but shorter than a rifle, which provides a trained SWAT officer with better control inside of a structure with greater accuracy than a handgun.

Usage: MP5 SMG’s are to be used exclusively by officers assigned to the SWAT Team.

These weapons are used in incidents where lethal force is justified to protect innocent life.

Training Requirements: SWAT Officers must successfully complete a POST certified SWAT school and regularly train and qualify with various weapons systems including the MP5 SMG to maintain proficiency.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: H&K MP5 – Fifteen (15) years
The Department currently possesses the following SMG’s:

24 MP5 – 9mm Submachine gun (Quantity: See Appendix B)
Manufacturer: Heckler & Koch
Manufacturer Description Developed by Heckler & Koch in the mid-1960s, the 9 mm MP5 submachine gun uses the same delayed blowback operating system found on the famous HK G3 automatic rifle. Reliability, accuracy, ease of handling, simple maintenance, and safety — all the elements of HK excellence are highlighted on the MP5. Firing from the closed-bolt position in all modes of fire make MP5 submachine guns extremely accurate and controllable.
(Photo and description source: MP5 - Heckler & Koch (hk-usa.com) Rifle & Pistol Ammunition:

Rifle Ammunition: Rifle ammunition manufactured specifically for rifles chambered in

5.56/.223 Remington or .308 Winchester. Pistol ammunition manufactured specifically for 9mm luger. (Used in the MP5)
Capability: 5.56/.223 or .308 rifle ammunition used in conjunction with an AR-15 type rifles or .308 sniper rifles provides officers the ability to engage hostile suspects at distances generally greater than the effective distance of their handguns. Rifle ammunition fired from AR-15 rifles, or .308 sniper rifles offers advantages over handguns, such as increased accuracy potential and the ability to defeat soft body armor but are not appropriate for every situation.

Usage: To project a force against a selected target to have an effect, potentially lethal.

Officers shall carry only department issued ammunition on duty. Officers shall be issued fresh duty ammunition in the specified quantity yearly. Use is established under Lexipol Policy 305. It is the policy of the San Luis Obispo Police Department to utilize

25 ammunition only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to state and federal law, including those regarding the use of force.

Training Requirements: All sworn personnel are required to qualify annually with their duty weapons (pistol and rifle, if assigned) on an approved course of fire.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: Approximately 5-year shelf life.

The Department currently possesses the following types of rifle/SMG duty and training ammunition:

HORNADY ELD TAP PRECISION 168 GRAIN (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Hornady Ammunition
Manufacturer Description: (a) .308 Winchester, polymer tip, 2582 feet per second muzzle velocity, brass casing. high accuracy round, for duty use in SWAT sniper rifles.

Hornady 308 WIN TAP 168 gr. ELD MATCH TAP PRECISION ammunition was designed as an improvement on the 168 gr. A-MAX TAP PRECISION load by incorporating the new ELD Match bullet. The 168 gr. ELD Match bullet with Heat Shield tip delivers the excellent terminal performance TAP Precision is known for, but features a resilient, heat resistant polymer tip that improves the ballistic coefficient, resulting in higher impact velocities, less drop, less wind drift, and more energy on target. (Description and photo source: https://www.hornadyle.com/) HORNADY TAP SBR 75 GRAIN (Quantity: See Appendix B)
Manufacturer: Hornady Ammunition
Manufacturer Description: 5.56 NATO, 2270 feet per second muzzle velocity, brass casing, barrier penetrating round, for duty use in SWAT sniper rifles. TAP® SBR™ is

26 designed specifically for 10.5"-11.5" SBR’s by using proprietary propellant technology and a bullet designed with technology from industry leading Critical Duty® FlexLock® bullets. TAP® SBR™ provides exceptional ammunition performance in SBR’s suppressed or unsuppressed, with virtually no flash or residue, dramatically reduced sound signature, will not foul or overheat suppressors, uniform velocity and accuracy, and provides controllable rate of fire in automatic platforms. Designed to meet the requirements of the FBI protocol, TAP® SBR™ is the optimum choice for 10.5"-11.5" barreled 5.56 rifles.
(Description and photo source: https://www.hornadyle.com/) Winchester Ranger Law Enforcement 55 Grain, .223 (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Winchester
Manufacturer Description: .223 Remington, full metal jacket, 3240 feet per second muzzle velocity, brass casing. used in department-issued rifles as training ammunition. (Description and photo source: USA223L1 | Winchester Ammunition)

27 Barrett M33 - 661 GRAIN .50 Caliber (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Barrett
Manufacturer Description: Our 50 BMG ammunition is ready for action. Encased in Barrett head-stamped brass, every cartridge is loaded with noncorrosive powder and primers as well as a 661 gr projectile using state-of-the-art machinery. (Description and photo source 50 BMG - Barrett Firearms) Hornady 135 Grain, 9mm (Quantity: See Appendix B)
Manufacturer: Hornady
Manufacturer Description: The patented Hornady® Flex Tip® design eliminates clogging and aids bullet expansion. A large mechanical jacket-to-core InterLock® band works to keep the bullet and core from separating for maximum weight retention, excellent expansion and consistent penetration and terminal performance through all FBI test barriers. The FlexLock® is an “intelligent bullet” that reacts differently depending on the barrier it encounters, delivering “barrier blind” performance after penetrating urban barriers such as plywood, sheet metal and even auto glass.

28 (Description and photo source 9MM Luger +P 135 gr FlexLock® Critical Duty® - Hornady Manufacturing, Inc)
Winchester 115 Grain, 9mm FMJ (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Winchester
Manufacturer Description: Backed by generations of legendary excellence, Winchester "USA White Box" stands for consistent performance and outstanding value, offering high-quality ammunition to suit a wide range of hunter's and shooter's needs. (Description and photo source Q4172 | Winchester Ammunition)

29 Diversionary Devices (Flashbangs)
Diversionary Devices (Flashbangs): Canisters that emit a loud noise and bright light.

Capability: Diversionary Devices can release large amounts of stored energy in the form of heat, light, pressure, and noise. They are intended to temporarily distract, confuse, and disorientate subjects. They can also be used as “attention-getting” devices. A diversionary device is ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during assaults, hostage rescue, room entry or other high-risk arrest situations producing atmospheric over-pressure and brilliant white light, and as a result, can cause shortterm (6-8 seconds) physiological/psychological sensory deprivation to give officers a tactical advantage.

Usage: Diversionary devices shall only be used:

By officers who have been trained in their proper use
In hostage and barricaded situations
In high-risk warrant (search/arrest) service where there may be extreme hazards to officers
During high-risk situations where use would enhance officer safety.

During training exercises
Training Requirements: Prior to use, officers must attend in-house diversionary device training conducted by certified instructors.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: Five (5) year limited warranty. Five (5) year shelf life.

The Department currently possesses the following types of Diversionary Devices:

Combined Tactical Systems 9-Bang Diversionary Device (Quantity: See Appendix B)
Manufacturer: Combined Tactical Systems
Manufacturer Description: The 7290-9 Flash-Bang exhibits a non-bursting, nonfragmenting multi-bang device that produces a thunderous bang with an intense bright light. Ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during assaults, hostage rescue, room entry or other high-risk arrest situations. The unit has a 175db output and produces 6-8 million candelas of light.

30 (Photo and description source https://www.combinedsystems.com/product/7290-9-flashbang-aluminum-body-9-bang-priced-individually-must-order-in-quantities-of-12/) Liberty Dynamic Low Roll Diversionary Device (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Liberty Dynamic
Manufacturer Description: Deployment mechanics match existing flashbangs, therefore minimal training will be required. A digital "smart" fuse improves operational control through increased adaptability and a 0-delay deviation. The smart fuse can be factory programmed to any delay length. Emitting a powerful and disorienting report, the Enhanced Noise Flash Diversion Device's energetic sound and light output surpasses industry standards. The output is also factory scalable to specification (Tested to 184db). Semi-flat ergonomic design promotes improved target accuracy as the device does not roll after deployment. LED indicator lights provide device condition feedback.

Liberty Dynamic's Enhanced Noise Flash Diversion Devices are reloadable, thereby reducing overall operating costs. Safe and inexpensive reloadable training cartridges enable personnel to be more adequately trained while still maximizing costeffectiveness.

31 (Photo and description source The Safer & Smarter Tactical Flashbang Diversionary Device | Liberty Dynamic)
Chemical Agents, Smoke Canisters:

Chemical Agents and Smoke Canisters: Canisters that contain chemical agents that are released when deployed. Chemical agents can include irritants such as Chlorobenzalmalononitrile (CS) or an inflammatory agent such as Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) or Pava (synthetic OC). Chemical agents can be liquid, powder, or gaseous.

Delivery systems can be pyrotechnic, blast dispersion, OC Fogger, or aerosol.

Capability: Depending on the delivery method, chemical agents are capable of being introduced in proximity or from a distance. Depending on the type of delivery system and/or quantity, chemical agents can be used to saturate individual suspects, violent crowds, or areas of varied size to also include structures.

Usage: Situations for the use of chemical agents may include but are not limited to:

Self-destructive, dangerous and combative individuals
Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents (see below) Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained Potentially vicious animals
Training exercises or approved demonstrations.

Chemical agents can also be used to prevent an armed suspect from accurately firing at citizens and/or officers. They can also be used in limited instances during civil unrest when objectively reasonable to defend against a threat to life or serious bodily injury to any individual, including the officer, or to bring an objectively dangerous and unlawful situation safely and effectively under control. See Penal Code 13652. Chemical agents are uses are governed under Lexipol Policy 302. It is the policy of the San Luis Obispo

32 Police Department to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to state and federal law, including those regarding the use of force.

Training Requirements: Officers utilizing chemical agent canisters attended a POST certified school in deploying less lethal and chemical agent munitions.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: Combined Tactical Systems (CTS) Chemical Agent Canisters and Munitions – Five (5) year limited warranty. Five (5) year shelf life.

Note: Due to manufacturing shortages and supply chain issues, some chemical munitions have been replaced with similar versions from Defense Technology.

The Department currently possesses the following types of Chemical Agent & Smoke Canisters:

CTS Smoke Canister #5210B (Quantity: See Appendix B)
Manufacturer: Combined Tactical Systems
Manufacturer Description: Pyrotechnic smoke grenade used for concealment or as a signaling device.
(Photo and description source: 5210 - White Smoke Canister Grenade - Combined Systems)
CTS Triple-PHASER CS Canister #5231 (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Combined Tactical Systems
Manufacturer Description: CS Triple Phaser canister grenade is a large diameter grenade consisting of 3 separate aluminum canisters pressed together with separate

33 charges between each canister. When deployed, the grenade will separate over a broad space to give a wider area of coverage. Can be launched or thrown. (Photo and description source: 5231 - Triple Phaser CS Smoke Grenade - Combined Systems)
CTS Riot CS Canister #5230 (Quantity: See Appendix B)
Manufacturer: Combined Tactical Systems
Manufacturer Description: Large diameter burning grenade that discharges a high volume of smoke and chemical agent through multiple emission ports. Specifically for outdoor use and should not be deployed on rooftops, in crawl spaces or indoors due to potential fire hazard. Can be hand thrown or launched. Discharge duration can reach up to 40 seconds.
(Photo and description source: 5230- CS Canister Grenade - Combined Systems) CTS Riot CS Canister #5230B (Quantity: See Appendix B)
Manufacturer: Combined Tactical Systems

34 Manufacturer Description: Pyrotechnic grenade designed for indoor use delivering a maximum amount of irritant smoke throughout multiple rooms with minimal risk of fire. (Photo and description source: 5230B- CS Baffled Canister Grenade, Pyro, Low Flame Potential - Combined Systems)
Defense Technology Triple-Chaser CS (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Defense Technology
Manufacturer Description: The Triple-Chaser® CS consists of three separate canisters pressed together with separating charges between each. When deployed, the canisters separate and land approximately 20 feet apart allowing increased area coverage in a short period of time. This grenade can be hand thrown or launched from a fired delivery system. The grenade is 6.5 in. by 2.7 in. and holds an approximately 3.2 oz. of active agent payload. It has an approximate burn time of 20-30 seconds. (Photo and description source https://www.defense-technology.com/product/triplechaser-separating-canister-cs/ ) Defense Technology Riot Control CS (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Defense Technology
Manufacturer Description: The Riot Control CS Grenade is designed specifically for outdoor use in crowd control situations with a high volume continuous burn that expels its payload in approximately 20-40 seconds through four gas ports located on the top of

35 the canister. This grenade can be used to conceal tactical movement or to route a crowd. The volume of smoke and agent is vast and obtrusive. This launchable grenade is 6.0 in. by 2.35 in. and holds approximately 2.7 oz. of active agent. (Photo and description source https://www.defense-technology.com/product/riot-controlcontinuous-discharge-grenade-cs/ ) Defense Technology Flameless Tri-Chamber OC (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Defense Technology
Manufacturer Description: Designed for law enforcement and corrections, the OC Flameless Tri-Chamber Pyrotechnic Grenade combines the effectiveness of Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) as an incapacitating agent with the flexible delivery methods, range and area coverage of pyrotechnic munitions. The OC Flameless Tri-Chamber Grenade can be used in crowd control, or barricade situations, as a less lethal solution to incapacitate subjects through temporary respiratory discomfort, while reducing or negating the chance of fire to structures. The Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade can be used in crowd control as well as tactical deployment situations by Law Enforcement and Corrections but was designed with the barricade situation in mind. Its applications in tactical situations are primarily to detect and/or dislodge barricaded subjects. The purpose of the Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade is to minimize the risks to all parties through pain compliance, temporary discomfort, and/or incapacitation of potentially violent or dangerous subjects. The Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade provides the option of delivering a pyrotechnic chemical device indoors, maximizing the chemicals’ effectiveness via heat and vaporization, while minimizing or negating the chance of fire to the structure.

36 (Photo and description source https://www.defense-technology.com/product/flamelesstri-chamber-oc-grenade/) Defense Technology Flameless Tri-Chamber SAF-Smoke (Quantity: See Appendix B)
Manufacturer: Defense Technology
Manufacturer Description: The design of the Tri-Chamber Flameless Saf-Smoke™ Grenade allows the contents to burn within an internal can and disperse the agent safely with reduced risk of fire. The grenade is designed primarily for indoor tactical situations to detect and/or dislodge a barricaded subject. This grenade will deliver approximately .70 oz. of agent during its 20-25 seconds burn time. The Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade can be used in crowd control as well as tactical deployment situations by Law Enforcement and Corrections but was designed with the barricade situation in mind. Its applications in tactical situations are primarily to detect and/or dislodge barricaded subjects. The purpose of the Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade is to minimize the risks to all parties through pain compliance, temporary discomfort, and/or incapacitation of potentially violent or dangerous subjects. The Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade provides the option of delivering a pyrotechnic chemical device indoors, maximizing the chemicals’ effectiveness via heat and vaporization, while minimizing or negating the chance of fire to the structure.

The Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade is NOT to be launched utilizing a launching cup. (Photo and description source https://www.defense-technology.com/product/flamelesstri-chamber-saf-smoke-grenade/)

37 Defense Technology Flameless Tri-Chamber CS (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Defense Technology
Manufacturer Description: The design of the Tri-Chamber Flameless CS Grenade allows the contents to burn within an internal can and disperse the agent safely with reduced risk of fire. The grenade is designed primarily for indoor tactical situations to detect and/or dislodge a barricaded subject. This grenade will deliver approximately .70 oz. of agent during its 20-25 seconds burn time. The Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade can be used in crowd control as well as tactical deployment situations by Law Enforcement and Corrections but was designed with the barricade situation in mind. Its applications in tactical situations are primarily to detect and/or dislodge barricaded subjects. The purpose of the Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade is to minimize the risks to all parties through pain compliance, temporary discomfort, and/or incapacitation of potentially violent or dangerous subjects. The Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade provides the option of delivering a pyrotechnic chemical device indoors, maximizing the chemicals’ effectiveness via heat and vaporization, while minimizing or negating the chance of fire to the structure.

The Tri-Chamber Flameless Grenade is NOT to be launched utilizing a launching cup. (Photo and description source https://www.defense-technology.com/product/flamelesstri-chamber-cs-grenade/) Defense Technology Command Initiated Adaptor (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Defense Technology
Manufacturer Description: The 1600 Command Initiated Adaptor replaces the standard M201A1 Type Fuze in the Spede-Heat™, Riot Control, Maximum HC Smoke, Saf-Smoke™, Triple-Chaser®, Han-Ball™, Pocket Tactical, Colored Smoke and Flameless Tri-Chamber grenades. It is most commonly used in tactical situations by Law Enforcement and Corrections and was designed for instantaneous and remote initiation.

38 (Photo and description source https://www.defense-technology.com/product/commandinitiated-adapter/ ) 40mm Launchers:
40mm Launchers (Projectile Launch Platforms): A single shot or multi-shot Less Lethal Impact Weapon (LLIM) launcher capable of firing a variety of 40mm rounds. (40mm launchers are considered “Projectile Launch Platforms” under AB-481).

Capability: 40mm launchers can fire a variety of munitions with a maximum effective range of one hundred twenty (120) feet. 40mm launchers can deliver 40mm munitions in the form of chemical agents, sponge rounds, or combined use sponge OC chemical agent rounds.

Usage: 40mm launchers utilized with less lethal sponge rounds may be deployed to impact subjects demonstrating assaultive behavior or life-threatening behavior, as defined in Department Policy & Procedure (Use of Force). 40mm launchers utilized with less lethal sponge rounds may also be used to control an actively resistive subject reasonably believed to possess or have immediate access to a deadly weapon, within the force guidelines of Department Policy & Procedure (Use of Force). The main objectives that officers attempt to achieve in using an LLIM on a subject exhibiting any of the aforementioned criteria are to effect an investigative detention or arrest, control a subject who is in lawful custody, prevent an escape, or protect the officer, the subject, or another person from injury or death. 40mm single launchers combined with less lethal 40mm sponge rounds are authorized to be used by any officer that has been trained in its use and maintains current LLIM qualifications.

Training Requirements: Officers that have been trained in the use of the 40mm launcher undergo thorough classroom and live fire training in its use from POST certified instructors. Officers are required to regularly train and qualify with 40mm launchers and projectile launch platforms on a quarterly basis to maintain proficiency.

Lifespan: Defense Technology 40mm Launchers – Fifteen (15) years.

Combined Tactical Systems Launching Cup – Twenty-Five (25) years.

39 The Department currently possesses the following types of 40mm launchers:

Defense Technology – 40mm LMT Single Launcher #1425 (40mm Single Shot Launcher) (Quantity: See Appendix B)
Manufacturer: Defense Technology
Manufacturer Description: Manufactured exclusively for Defense Technology the 40 LMTS is a single shot launcher with and adjustable intergraded Front Grip (IFG) with light mounting rail. The ambidextrous Lateral Sling Mounty (LSM) and QD mounting systems allow both a single and two point sling attachment. The 40LMTS will fire standard 40mm less lethal ammunition, up to 4.8 inches in cartridge length. The Picatinny Rail Mounting System will accept a wide array of enhanced optic/sighting systems.
(Photo and description source: https://www.defense-technology.com/product/40mm-lmttactical-single-launcher-expandable-stock/ Combined Systems – LC5 Gas Launching Cup (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Combined Tactical Systems
Manufacturer Description: The LC5 Launching Cups are designed for the 5200 series grenades. The cups can be attached to virtually any 12ga shotgun and the munition launched with our model 2600 launching cartridge. These can be fired from most 12ga smooth bore shotguns.

40 (Photo and description source: LC5 Launching Cup - Combined Systems) 40mm Munitions:
40mm Munition: The 40MM LLIM round is a sponge cartridge. The sponge round has a blue colored nose with a black base. The casing is stainless.

Capability: 40mm LLIM direct impact rounds can impact a suspect at a maximum effective range of one hundred twenty (120) feet.

Usage: Circumstances appropriate for deployment include, but are not limited to, situations in which: (a) The suspect is armed with a weapon and the tactical circumstances allow for the safe application of approved munitions. (b) The suspect has made credible threats to harm him/herself or others. (c) The suspect is engaged in riotous behavior or is throwing rocks, bottles or other dangerous projectiles at people and/or officers. (d) There is probable cause to believe that the suspect has already committed a crime of violence and is refusing to comply with lawful orders. The San Luis Obispo Police Department adheres to California Penal Code 13652 and Lexipol Policy 302.

Training Requirements: Officers that have been trained in the use of the 40mm impact ammunition in conjunction with the 40mm single launcher undergo thorough classroom and live fire training in its use. Additionally, officers trained in the use of the 40mm single launcher must pass annual LLIM qualifications to maintain proficiency.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: Five (5) year limited warranty. Five (5) year shelf life The Department currently possesses the following types of 40mm ammunition:
40mm Extended Range Direct Impact Sponge Round – Model 6323 (Quantity: See Appendix B)
Manufacturer: Defense Technology

41 Manufacturer Description: The 40 mm Direct Impact® LE Extended Range Round is a point-of-aim, point-of-impact direct-fire round and is intended to be used in applications that exceed the performance capability of the standard Direct Impact Round. An excellent solution whether you need to incapacitate a single subject or control a crowd.

The black nosed inert munition is a great option for training. (Photo and description source: Direct Impact® LE 40 mm Extended Range Inert Crushable Foam Round - Defense Technology (defense-technology.com) Byrna 40mm Direct Impact BIP
Manufacturer: Byrna
Manufacturer Description: The 40mm BIP is a blunt impact kinetic energy round. The patented technology involves an internal energy absorption system, as well as a collapsible gel head. This head “mushrooms” upon impact while absorbing a portion of the kinetic energy and dispersing the inertia (causing less injury). Additionally, by spreading the impact of the nose over a larger surface area, greater pain compliance is achieved as more sensory nerves on the target will be stimulated, thus increasing the pain reception.
(Photo and description source: SDI By Byrna 40MM – Byrna Law Enforcement)

42 Defense Technology eXact iMpact (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Defense Technology
Manufacturer Description: The eXact iMpact™ 40 mm Sponge Round is a point-of-aim, point-of-impact direct-fire round. This lightweight, high-speed projectile consisting of a plastic body and sponge nose that is spin stabilized via the incorporated rifling collar and the 40 mm launcher’s rifled barrel. The round utilizes smokeless powder as the propellant, and, therefore, have velocities that are extremely consistent. Used for Crowd Control, Patrol, and Tactical Applications.

Photo and description source (https://www.defense-technology.com/product/exactimpact-40-mm-standard-range-sponge-round/ ) Ferret 40mm Barricade Round CS – Model 2292 (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: Defense Technology
Manufacturer Description: The Ferret® 40mm Round is non-burning and suitable for indoor use. Used primarily by tactical teams, it is designed to penetrate barriers, such as windows, hollow core doors, wallboard and thin plywood. Upon impacting the barrier, the nose cone ruptures and instantaneously delivers a small chemical payload inside of a structure or vehicle.

In a tactical deployment situation, the 40mm Ferret is primarily used to dislodge barricaded subjects from confined areas. Its purpose is to minimize the risks to all parties through pain compliance, temporary discomfort and/or incapacitation of potentially violent or dangerous subjects.

43 (Photo and description source: https://www.defense-technology.com/product/ferret-40- mm-powder-barricade-round-cs/)
PepperBall Launchers and PepperBall Munitions:

PepperBall Launchers and PepperBall Munitions: A non-lethal munitions system that employs paint ball launchers to fire “PepperBalls” that contain Pava pepper powder in place of the paint. The PepperBall delivery system combines chemical agent exposure with kinetic energy impact to aid in its effectiveness in addressing armed and/or violent individuals or crowds. PepperBall munitions also include glass breaking rounds and marking rounds.

Capability: PepperBall launchers give officers the ability to address an armed and/or violent suspect(s) with a non-lethal munition that delivers both chemical agent and kinetic energy impact. This combination can be extremely effective in gaining compliance or reducing threat potential with an armed and/or violent suspect(s). Due to its design, PepperBalls can be delivered from a larger standoff distance allowing for an added degree of officer safety. Its high round capability and accuracy allow for its use in a wide variety of operational environments.

Usage: Circumstances appropriate for deployment include, but are not limited to, situations in which: (a) The suspect is armed with a weapon and the tactical circumstances allow for the safe application of approved munitions. (b) The suspect has made credible threats to harm him/herself or others. (c) The suspect is engaged in riotous behavior or is throwing rocks, bottles or other dangerous projectiles at people and/or officers. (d) There is probable cause to believe that the suspect has already committed a crime of violence and is refusing to comply with lawful orders. The San Luis Obispo Police Department adheres to California Penal Code 13652 and Lexipol Policy 302.

44 Training Requirements: Officers undergo regular classroom and live fire proficiency training by certified instructors. Additionally, officers are required to qualify with PepperBall launchers on a quarterly basis to maintain proficiency.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: PepperBall Launcher – No manufacturer life span indicated by manufacturer. Two (2) year limited manufacturer warranty.

PepperBall Munitions – Approximately three (3) year shelf life.

The Department currently possesses the following types of pepper ball launchers and pepper ball munitions:

Pepper Ball Launchers (Quantity: See Appendix B)
SX Launcher
Manufacturer: PepperBall
Manufacturer Description: Compact and lightweight, the PepperBall FTC is the industry gold standard for crowd-control and other applications where accuracy and reliability is a factor. The FTC features a modular design with a rapid feeding loader and firing rate of 10-12 RPS.
(Photo and description source FTC™ | Crowd Control | Pepper Ball Launcher – FTC is a newer version of the SX, which is no longer on the pepperball website)

45 PepperBall Glass Breaker – Projectile PepperBall Munition (Quantity: See Appendix A) [*NOTE: This projectile is utilized for glass breaking applications only.] Manufacturer: PepperBall
Manufacturer Description: Used to break side glass of vehicles and residential glass windows.
(Photo and description source: https://www.pepperball.com/products/glass-breaker/) PepperBall Live – Projectile PepperBall Munition (Quantity: See Appendix B) Manufacturer: PepperBall
Manufacturer Description: The classic PepperBall projectile. Contains 2% PAVA, and is excellent for direct impact and area saturation, especially in confined, interior spaces. (Photo and description source: https://pepperball.com/projectiles/live/)

46 Defense Logistics Disposition (DLA) Services (formerly DRMO) Equipment:

Reutilized equipment is donated to state and local governments as well as law enforcement agencies. The following items were received from the military at no cost:

Detachable Weapon Magazines
Description: COLT 30-round magazines chambered for .223/5.56 caliber rifles. (Quantity: See appendix B)
Usage: Magazines are for use with Department issued AR-15 rifles. It is the policy of the San Luis Obispo Police Department to utilize these magazines only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

Training Requirements: Only members that are POST certified to use an issued AR15 rifle may be issued and use these magazines.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: Approximately 10 years.

Reflex Rifle Sights
Description: AIM POINT Reflex Optics. A reflector sight or reflex sight is an optical sight that allows the user to look through a partially reflecting glass viewer to identify where a weapon system is pointed. It is the primary aiming device for modern rifles. (Quantity: See appendix B)
Usage: Reflex rifle sights are for use with Department issued AR-15 rifles. It is the policy of the San Luis Obispo Police Department to utilize these sighting systems only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

Training Requirements: Only members that are POST certified to use an issued AR15 rifle may be issued and use these reflex rifle sights.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: Approximately 10-15 years.

Backup Iron Rifle Sights
Description: MAG-PULL flip-up rear sights. Back-up sighting system. (Quantity: See appendix B)

47 Usage: Iron rifle sights are for use with Department issued AR-15 rifles. It is the policy of the San Luis Obispo Police Department to utilize these sighting systems only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

Training Requirements: Only members that are POST certified to use an issued AR15 rifle may be issued and use these iron rifle sights.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: Approximately 10-15 years.

Laser Range Finder
Description: Laser range finder. The range finder determines the distance between two points so that calculations can be made to determine the trajectory of rounds fired by a precision rifle team member.
(Quantity: See appendix B)
Usage: It is the policy of the San Luis Obispo Police Department to utilize laser range finders only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

Training Requirements: Only members that are POST certified to use an issued longrange rifle system may be issued and use these laser range finders.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: Approximately 10-15 years.

Infrared Transmitter
Description: Infrared transmitters are small blinking infrared lights that attach to a 9-volt battery. Infrared transmitters emit an infrared light that can be seen using night vision illuminators.
(Quantity: See appendix B)
Usage: Infrared transmitters are used by tactical teams in conjunction with night vision equipment. The transmitters are used to identify objects or locations that can only be seen with the use of night vision equipment. Use of infrared transmitters are deployed at the direction of the SWAT Team Commander for use during tactical operations.

Officers deploying the infrared transmitters receive periodic training in the proper deployment of the transmitters. It is the policy of the San Luis Obispo Police Department

48 to utilize these infrared transmitters only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

Training Requirements: Only members that are trained in the use of night vision equipment are authorized to use infrared transmitters.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: Approximately 10-15 years.

Image Intensifier (Night Vision)
Description: Night Vision Goggles. Nigh vision allows Officers to see in low light conditions.
(Quantity: See appendix B)
Usage: It is the policy of the San Luis Obispo Police Department to utilize night vision goggles only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force. These goggles are assigned to SWAT and are used at the direction of the SWAT Team Commander.

Training Requirements: Only members who receive POST approved training in the use of night vision equipment are authorized to use the equipment. Additionally, all members that deploy night vision equipment are required to train with the equipment several times per year.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: Approximately 10 years.

Toxicological Agents Protective Coveralls
Description: Rubber coated coveralls used to protect officers during an incident involving chemical/biological contaminants.
(Quantity: See appendix B)
Usage: It is the policy of the San Luis Obispo Police Department to utilize protective coveralls for official law enforcement purposes. Members of the department are authorized to use the protective equipment during their response to any situation where chemical/biological contaminants are suspected.

Training Requirements: Officers are trained in the proper use of protective coveralls on a five-year training cycle.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C

49 Lifespan: Approximately 10-15 years.

Illuminator, Target Pointer, Aiming Laser
Description: EOTECH laser aiming device. This is a multi-function visible and infrared laser aiming device with laser illuminator.
(Quantity: See appendix B)
Usage: It is the policy of the San Luis Obispo Police Department to utilize the aiming laser only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force. The laser aiming device is used by SWAT members who are deploying a rifle while using night vision goggles. When using night vision, it becomes the primary aiming device for a rifle.

Training Requirements: Only members who received POST approved training in the proper use of the laser aiming device are authorized to use a rifle equipped with an EOTECH laser aiming device.

Fiscal Impact: See Appendix C
Lifespan: Approximately 10-15 years.

50 Appendix A
Military Equipment Deployment January 1st, 2025 – December 31, 2025 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle:

Date: Case #: Description:
01-02-2025 250102093 Fleeing Suspect
01-02-2025 None Special Enforcement – E-Bikes
01-07-2025 None Search for Suspicious Subject
01-18-2025 250118023 Protest/March Observation
01-18-2025 250118015 Sexual Assault Suspect Search
01-19-2025 250119040 Major Crime/Accident Scene Documentation 01-20-2025 None Assist SLO Fire Department in Promo Video 02-02-2025 250202068 Fleeing Suspect Search
02-06-2025 None Farmer’s Market Security
02-06-2025 None Farmer’s Market Protest
02-07-2025 250207087 DUI Checkpoint
02-20-2025 None Farmer’s Market Security
02-20-2025 None Search Warrant Service
02-25-2025 None Assist SLO Fire Department in Promo Video 03-05-2025 None St. Fratty’s Day Scouting/Testing
03-07-2025 None Assist City Demolition Request
03-08-2025 250308021 Civil Disturbance
03-14-2025 None St. Fratty’s Day Scouting/Testing
03-15-2025 None St. Fratty’s Day Operation
03-20-2025 None Search Warrant Service
04-05-2025 None No Kings Protest
04-15-2025 None Assist City Building Inspection
04-22-2025 250422057 Traffic Collision Scene Documentation

51 04-25-2025 None Assist City Building Inspection
05-04-2025 250504048 Protest/Civil Disturbance
05-20-2025 None Search for Suspect with Firearm
05-15-2025 None Protest/Civil Disturbance
05-19-2025 None Assist Other Agency – HazMat Documentation 05-19-2025 None Assist City Building Inspection
05-20-2025 None Search for Suspect with Firearm
05-21-2025 None Assist Fire – Scene Documentation
06-14-2025 None Protest/March
06-20-2025 250620087 Missing Juvenile Search
06-30-2025 250630080 Fleeing Suspect Search
07-30-2025 250730022 Fleeing Suspect Search
08-05-2025 250805017 Search for Burglary Suspect
08-05-2025 None Assist Fire Department
08-06-2025 250806011 Search for Suspect with Firearm
08-20-2025 250820029 Search and Rescue
09-02-2025 None SWAT Search Warrant Service
09-09-2025 250909014 SWAT Callout
09-10-2025 250910009 Major Crime/Accident Scene Documentation 09-12-2025 250911088 Major Crime/Accident Scene Documentation 09-13-2025 250913058 Barricaded Suspect
09-14-2025 None Assist Cal Poly Open House Security
09-16-2025 250916028 Search and Rescue
09-17-2025 250917050 Search and Rescue
09-29-2025 None Assist Cal Poly Protest
09-29-2025 None Assist Atascadero PD – Collision Scene
10-07-2025 251007030 Search Warrant Service
10-18-2025 None Protest/March

52 10-28-2025 251028027 Search for Fleeing Felony Suspect 10-31-2025 None Halloween Operation – Security
11-12-2025 251112080 Fleeing Suspect Search
11-19-2025 251119024 Fleeing Suspect Search
12-02-2025 251202066 Major Crime/Accident Scene Documentation 12-03-2025 APC25-1994 Major Crime/Accident Scene Documentation 12-08-2025 251207012 Search for Subject – Suspicious Circs 12-10-2025 251210011 SWAT Callout
12-17-2025 251217011 Major Crime/Accident Scene Documentation 12-18-2025 251218008 Search Warrant Service
12-24-2025 251224013 Assist CHP – Fleeing Suspect
12-26-2025 251226019 Search Warrant Service
12-30-2025 251230024 Search Warrant Service
Robots:

Date: Case #: Description:
09/02/2025 None Attempted murder search and arrest warrant – Residence 1 (Paso Robles Police Department Case)
09/02/2025 None Attempted murder search and arrest warrant – Residence 2 (Paso Robles Police Department Case)
09/09/2025 250909014 Barricaded suspect threatened to shoot pedestrians in downtown San Luis Obispo
12/10/2025 251204025 Search warrant service at a residence in Arroyo Grande for a SLOPD weapons investigation
Lenco Bearcat Armored Rescue Vehicle:

Date: Case #: Description:
09/02/2025 None Attempted murder search and arrest warrant – Residence 1 (Paso Robles Police Department Case)

53 09/02/2025 None Attempted murder search and arrest warrant – Residence 2 (Paso Robles Police Department Case)
09/09/2025 250909014 Barricaded suspect threatened to shoot pedestrians in downtown San Luis Obispo
12/09/2025 None Barricaded suspect armed with a knife threatened to harm neighbors (Paso Robles Police Department
Case)
12/10/2025 251204025 Search warrant service at a residence in Arroyo Grande for a SLOPD weapons investigation
Mobile Incident Command Vehicle:

Date: Case #: Description:
09/02/2025 None Attempted murder search and arrest warrant – Residence 1 (Paso Robles Police Department Case)
09/02/2025 None Attempted murder search and arrest warrant – Residence 2 (Paso Robles Police Department Case)
09/09/2025 250909014 Barricaded suspect threatened to shoot pedestrians in downtown San Luis Obispo
12/09/2025 None Barricaded suspect armed with a knife threatened to harm neighbors (Paso Robles Police Department
Case)
12/10/2025 251204025 Search warrant service at a residence in Arroyo Grande for a SLOPD weapons investigation
Breaching Shotgun and Ammunition:

None
Rifles:

None
Noise Flash Diversionary Device (NFDD):

None

54 Chemical Agent Deployment:

None
40mm Launchers and Munitions:

None
PepperBall Launcher and Munitions:

None

55 Appendix B
Military Equipment Quantities
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles:

DJI Mavic Mini:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 2 DJI Mavic Mini.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 2 DJI Mavic Mini.

DJI Mavic 2 Enterprise Dual:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 DJI Mavic 2 Enterprise Dual.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 DJI Mavic 2 Enterprise Dual.

DJI Mavic 2 Enterprise Advanced:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 DJI Mavic 2 Enterprise Advanced.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 DJI Mavic 2 Enterprise Advanced.

DJI Mavic 3 Enterprise:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 DJI Mavic 3 Enterprise.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 DJI Mavic 3 Enterprise.

DJI Matrice:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 DJI Matrice.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 DJI Matrice.

DJI Avata:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 DJI Avata.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 DJI Avata.

Robots:

Icor Technologies Mini-Caliber:

56 On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 Icor Technologies Mini-Caliber.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 Icor Technologies Mini-Caliber.

Armored Vehicles:

Lenco Bearcat Armored Rescue Vehicle:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 Lenco Bearcat.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 Lenco Bearcat.

Mobile Incident Command:

Pace American Mobile Incident Command Trailer:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 Pace American MIC Trailer.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 Pace American MIC Trailer.
40mm Launchers and Munitions:

Defense Technology 40mm Single Shot Launcher:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 20 Defense Technology Single Shot Launchers.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 20 Defense Technology Single Shot Launchers.

Defense Technology 40mm Extended Range Direct Impact Sponge Round – Model 6323:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 60 rounds of Defense Technology 40mm Extended Range Direct Impact Sponge Munitions.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 20 rounds of Defense Technology 40mm Extended Range Direct Impact Sponge Munitions. (40 used in training.)

57 Byrna 40mm Direct Impact BIP :

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 22 rounds of Byrna 40mm Direct Impact BIP Munitions.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 15 rounds of Byrna 40mm Direct Impact BIP Munitions.
(7 rounds used in training.)
Defense Technology 40mm eXact iMpact Sponge Round:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 80 rounds of Defense Technology 40mm Extended Range Direct Impact Sponge Munitions.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 78 rounds of Defense Technology 40mm Extended Range Direct Impact Sponge Munitions. (22 used in training.)
Defense Technology Ferret 40mm Barricade Round CS – Model 2292:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 12 rounds of Defense Technology Ferret 40mm Barricade Round CS Munitions.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 25 rounds of Defense Technology Ferret 40mm Barricade Round CS Munitions. (37 used in training)
Defense Technology 12 ga. Launching Cup:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 2 Defense Technology 12 ga. Launching Cup.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 4 Defense Technology 12 ga. Launching Cup.

Distraction Devices:

Combined Tactical Systems 9-Bang Diversionary Device:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 10 Combined Tactical Systems 9-Bang diversionary devices.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 0 Combined Tactical Systems 9-Bang diversionary devices.
(One used in training, 9 expired.)

58 Liberty Dynamic Reloadable Low-Roll Diversionary Device Frame:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 30 Liberty Dynamic reloadable distraction device frames.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 30 Liberty Dynamic reloadable distraction device frames.

Liberty Dynamic Low-Roll Diversionary Device Reloads:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 40 Liberty Dynamic distraction device reloads.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 40 Liberty Dynamic distraction device reloads.

Defense Technology Command Initiated for DRACO:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 12 Defense Technology Command Initiated Devices.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 12 Defense Technology Command Initiated Devices.

Rifles/SMGs:

Barrett .50 Caliber Rifle:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 Barrett .50 Caliber Rifle.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 Barrett .50 Caliber Rifle.

Daniel Defense DD5 .308 Semi-Auto Sniper Rifle:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 Daniel Defense DD5 .308 Semi-Auto Sniper Rifle.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 Daniel Defense DD5 .308 Semi-Auto Sniper Rifle.

Accuracy International AT .308 LE Bolt-Action Sniper Rifle:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 2 Accuracy International AT .308 LE Bolt-Action Sniper Rifle.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 2 Accuracy International AT .308 LE Bolt-Action Sniper Rifle.

59 Colt 5.56 M4 Rifle:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 9 Colt 5.56 M4 Rifles.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 9 Colt 5.56 M4 Rifles.

Colt .223 AR-15 Rifle:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 55 Colt .223 AR-15 Rifles.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 55 Colt .223 AR-15 Rifles.

Heckler & Koch MP5 9mm Submachine Gun:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 6 Heckler & Koch MP5 9mm Submachine Guns.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 6 Heckler & Koch MP5 9mm Submachine Guns.

Chemical Agent and Smoke Canisters:

Combined Tactical Systems Smoke Canister #5210B:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 12 CTS smoke canisters.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 12 CTS smoke canisters.

Combined Tactical Systems Triple-PHASER CS Canister #5231:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 16 CTS TriplePHASER CS canisters.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 16 CTS TriplePHASER CS canisters.

Combined Tactical Systems Riot CS Canister #5230:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 17 CTS riot CS canisters.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 20 CTS riot CS canisters.

60 Combined Tactical Systems Baffled Riot CS Canister #5230B:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 16 CTS baffled riot CS canisters.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 8 CTS baffled riot CS canisters.
(8 used in training)
Defense Technology Triple-Chaser CS:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 10 Defense Technology Triple-Chaser CS.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 10 Defense Technology Triple-Chaser CS.

Defense Technology Riot Control CS:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 18 Defense Technology Riot Control CS.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 18 Defense Technology Riot Control CS.

Defense Technology Flameless Tri-Chamber OC:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 8 Defense Technology Flameless Tri-Chamber OC.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 6 Defense Technology Flameless Tri-Chamber OC.
(2 used in training)
Defense Technology Tri-Chamber SAF-Smoke:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 20 Defense Technology Tri-Chamber SAF-Smoke.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 17 Defense Technology Tri-Chamber SAF-Smoke.
(3 used in training)
Defense Technology Tri-Chamber CS:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 24 Defense Technology Tri-Chamber CS.

61 On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 15 Defense Technology Tri-Chamber CS.
(9 used in training)
PepperBall Launchers and Munitions:

PepperBall SX Launcher:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 4 PepperBall SX Launchers.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 4 PepperBall SX Launchers.

PepperBall Live Projectiles:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1500 projectiles of PepperBall Live.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1500 projectiles of PepperBall Live.

PepperBall Glass Break Rounds:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department 50 PepperBall Glass Break projectiles.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department 50 PepperBall Glass Break projectiles.

Shotgun Breaching Tools:

Remington 870 Express Breaching Shotgun:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 Remington 870 Express Breaching Shotgun.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 Remington 870 Express Breaching Shotgun.

Benelli M4 Breaching Shotgun:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 Benelli M4 Breaching Shotgun.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 1 Benelli M4 Breaching Shotgun.

62 Royal Arms Tesar-2 Black Cap 425 Grain Copper Frangible Breaching Round:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 80 Royal Arms Tesar-2 Black Cap 425 Grain Copper Frangible Breaching rounds.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 80 Royal Arms Tesar-2 Black Cap 425 Grain Copper Frangible Breaching rounds.

Duty Ammunition:

Note: Ammunition inventory fluctuates throughout the year depending on range dates, qualifications, courses of fire, officer monthly allotment and delivery and availability of ammunition orders.

Ammunition inventory used includes purchases made between 4/30/2025 and 05/01/2026.

Hornady 135 Grain, 9mm Ammunition:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 8,000 rounds of Hornady 135 grain 9mm ammunition.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 7,200 rounds of Hornady 135 grain 9mm ammunition.
7,800 rounds used in training and duty ammunition yearly replacement.

Winchester 115 Grain, 9mm FMJ Ammunition:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 37,000 rounds of Winchester 115 grain 9mm ammunition.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 20,000 rounds of Winchester 115 grain 9mm ammunition.
133,500 rounds used in training and Officer allotment.

Winchester Ranger Law Enforcement 55 Grain, .233 Ammunition:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 15,000 rounds of Winchester Ranger Law Enforcement 55 Grain, .223 ammunition.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 10,000 rounds of Winchester Ranger Law Enforcement 55 Grain, .223 ammunition. 22,5000 rounds used in training and Officer allotment.

Hornady ELD TAP Precision 168 Grain, .308 Ammunition:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 900 rounds of Hornady ELD TAP Precision 168 Grain, .308 ammunition.

63 On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 800 rounds of Hornady ELD TAP Precision 168 Grain, .308 ammunition.
2,100 rounds used in training.

Hornaday TAP SBR 75 Grain, 5.56:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 3,000 rounds of Hornady TAP SBR 75 Grain, 5.56 ammunition.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 3,400 rounds of Hornady TAP SBR 75 Grain, 5.56 ammunition.
1,100 rounds were used in training.

Barrett M33 661 Grain .50 Caliber Ammunition:

On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 39 rounds of Barrett M33 661 grain .50 caliber ammunition.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 39 rounds of Barrett M33 661 grain .50 caliber ammunition.
20 rounds were used in training.

Defense Logistics Disposition (DLA) Services (formerly DRMO) Equipment:

Detachable Weapon Magazines
On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 503 Detachable Weapon Magazines.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 503 Detachable Weapon Magazines.

Reflex Rifle Sights
On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 80 Reflex Rifle Sights.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 80 Reflex Rifle Sights.

Backup Iron Rifle Sights
On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 60 Backup Iron Rifle Sights.

64 On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 60 Backup Iron Rifle Sights.

Laser Range Finder
On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 3 Laser Range Finder.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 3 Laser Range Finder.

Infrared Transmitter
On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 75 Infrared Transmitter.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 75 Infrared Transmitter.

Image Intensifier (Night Vision)
On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 4 Image Intensifier.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 4 Image Intensifier.

Toxicological Agents Protective Coveralls
On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 18 Toxicological Agents Protective Coveralls.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 18 Toxicological Agents Protective Coveralls.

Illuminator, Target Pointer, Aiming Laser
On 06/01/2025 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 18 Illuminator, Target Pointer, Aiming Laser.

On 06/01/2026 the San Luis Obispo Police Department inventoried 18 Illuminator, Target Pointer, Aiming Laser.

65 Appendix C
Fiscal Impact by Equipment Type – Fiscal Year 2025 (July 2025 – June 2026) and Estimated Projected Cost
Military Equipment Appendix
Armored Vehicles
Equipment Name
and Model /
Manufacturer
Initial Cost Ongoing Annual Cost
FY25 (Approximate)
Projected Annual
Cost FY26
(Approximate)
Lenco Bear Cat (1) $169,000 (grant
funded)
$4,500 $4,500
Mobile Incident Command Vehicle (MIC)
Equipment Name
and Model /
Manufacturer
Initial Cost Ongoing Annual Cost
FY25 (Approximate)
Projected Annual
Cost FY26
(Approximate)
2011 Pace American $0 Donation from
AGPD + $50,000 to
outfit with equipment
$2,250 $2,250
Breaching Shotguns and Ammunition
Equipment Name and
Model / Manufacturer
Initial Cost Ongoing Annual Cost
FY25(Approximate)
Projected Annual
Cost FY26
(Approximate)
Remington 870
Shotguns Qty: (1)
$800 $20 $20
Benelli M4 Qty: (1) $1,900 $20 $20
Royal Arms Tesar-2
Black Cap 425 Grain
Copper Frangible
Breaching Round
(80)
$7.25 $40 $50
Patrol Rifles
Equipment Name
and Model /
Manufacturer
Initial Cost Ongoing Annual Cost
FY25 (Approximate)
Projected Annual
Cost FY26
(Approximate)
Colt Carbine AR-15
Rifle 5.56/.223
Caliber (55)
$99,000
($1,800 ea)
$2,200
($40 ea)
$2,200
($40 ea)

66 SWAT Rifles/SMGs
Equipment Name
and Model /
Manufacturer
Initial Cost Ongoing Annual Cost
FY25 (Approximate)
Projected Annual
Cost FY26
(Approximate)
Colt M4 Rifle (9)

5.56/.223 caliber
$17,100
($1,900 ea)
$360
($40 ea)
$360
($40 ea)
H&K 9mm SMG MP5
(6)
$15,000
($2,500 ea)
$0 $0
Accuracy
International AT LE
.308 (2)
$6,652 $20 $40
Daniel Defense .308
(1)
$4,500 $20 $20
Barrett .50 Caliber
Rifle (1)
$0 – Donation from
PG&E
Value $8,500
$20 $20
Pepper Ball Launchers and Munitions
Equipment Name
and Model /
Manufacturer
Initial Cost Ongoing Annual Cost
FY25 (Approximate)
Projected Annual
Cost FY26
(Approximate)
Pepper Ball SX
Launcher (4)
$3,800
($950 ea)
$80
($20 ea)
$80
($20 ea)
Pepper Ball Live
Projectiles (1500)
$5,700
($3.80 ea)
$900 $900
Pepper Ball Glass
Break 50 Projectiles
(50)
$137
($2.73 ea)
$25 $25
40MM Launchers and Rounds
Equipment Name
and Model /
Manufacturer
Initial Cost Ongoing Annual Cost
FY25 (Approximate)
Projected Annual
Cost FY26
(Approximate)
Defense Technology
Single Shot Launcher
(20)
$22,000
($1,100 ea)
$400
($20 ea)
$400
($20 ea)
Defense Technology
12 ga. Launching
Cup (2)
$600
($300 ea)
$0 $0
Defense Technology
40MM Extended
Range Impact (60)
$1605
($26.75 ea)
$200 $268
Byrna Direct Impact
BIP (22)
$506
($23 ea)
Discontinued

67 Defense Technology
40MM Ferret Round
(12)
$276
($32 ea)
$92 $140
Defense Technology
eXact iMpact Sponge
Round (80)
$1,920
($24 ea)
$225 $240
Distraction Devices
Equipment Name and
Model / Manufacturer
Initial Cost Ongoing Annual Cost
FY25 (Approximate)
Projected Annual
Cost FY26
(Approximate)
Liberty Dynamic
Reloadable Frame
(30)
$3,315
($110.50 ea)
$0 $0
Liberty Dynamic
Reloads (40)
$2,360
($59 ea)
$90 $708
Combined Tactical
Systems 9-Bang (10)
$2,100
($240 ea)
$210 $210
Defense Technology
Command Initiated
for DRACO (12)
$1,920
($160 ea)
$85 $320
Chemical Agent and Smoke Canisters
Equipment Name and
Model / Manufacturer
Initial Cost Ongoing Annual Cost
FY25 (Approximate)
Projected Annual
Cost FY26
(Approximate)
CTS Smoke Canister
(12)
$513
($42.80 ea)
$115 $128
CTS Triple-PHASER
CS (16)
$1,028
($64.27 ea)
$88 $0
CTS Riot CS
Canister (17)
$750
($44.14 ea)
$80 $132
CTS Baffled Riot CS
Canister (16)
$969
($60.56 ea)
$80 $1600 (triple chaser
/phaser replacement)
Defense Technology
Triple Chaser CS
(10)
$654
($65.40 ea)
$80 $0
Defense Technology
Riot Control CS (18)
$666
($37 ea)
$135 $148
Defense Technology
Flameless TriChamber OC (8)
$482
($60.30 ea)
$45 $121
Defense Technology
Flameless TriChamber SAFSmoke (20)
$1,084
($54.20 ea)
$80 $108

68 Defense Technology
Tri-Chamber CS (24)
$1,366
($56.95 ea)
$125 $125
Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS)
Equipment Name
and Model /
Manufacturer
Initial Cost Ongoing Annual Cost
FY25 (Approximate)
Projected Annual
Cost FY26
(Approximate)
DJI Mavic Mini (2) $1,200 $0 $0
DJI Mavic 2
Enterprise Dual (1)
$2,500 $0 $0
DJI Mavic 2 Dual
Advanced (1)
$3,000 $0 $0
DJI Mavic 3
Enterprise (1)
$7,000 $0 $0
DJI Matrice (1) $18,000 $850 $900
DJI Avata (1) $3,000 $350 $350
Annual Maintenance
and Battery
Replacement Cost
$1,500 $2,500
Robots
Equipment Name
and Model /
Manufacturer
Initial Cost Ongoing Annual Cost
FY25 (Approximate)
Projected Annual
Cost FY26
(Approximate)
Icor Technologies
Mini Caliber (1)
$105,000 $0 $0
Annual Maintenance
and Battery
Replacement Cost
$750 $1,500
Ammunition
Equipment Name
and Model /
Manufacturer
Initial Cost Ongoing Annual Cost
FY25 (Approximate)
Projected Annual
Cost FY26
(Approximate)
Barrett .50 Caliber
M33 661 grain (39)
$311
($7.99 ea)
$100 $200
Winchester Ranger
Law Enforcement 55
grain .223 (15000)
$3,000
($.20)
$4,100 $4,500
Hornady ELD
Precision 168 grain
.308 (900)
$1,566
($1.74 ea)
$3,590 $3,750

69 Hornady 5.56 TAP
SBR 75 Grain (3000)
$3,510
($1.17ea)
$4,165 $4,250
Winchester 9mm
115g FMJ (37000)
$11,100
($.30 ea)
$27,475 $28,000
Hornady 9mm 135
grain (8000)
$10,240
($1.28 ea)
$2,800 $3,000

Policy
707
San Luis Obispo Police Department
San Luis Obispo PD CA Policy Manual
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2026/06/24, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by San Luis Obispo Police
Department
Military Equipment - 1
Military Equipment
707.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the approval, acquisition, and reporting requirements of military equipment (Government Code § 7070; Government Code § 7071; Government Code § 7072).
707.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code § 7070):

Governing body – The elected or appointed body that oversees the Department.

Military equipment – Includes but is not limited to the following:
• Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. • Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. • High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. • Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants. • Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. • Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. • Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.
• Firearms and ammunition of_.50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
• Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than_.50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms.
• Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. • Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools. • Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
• Area denial electroshock devices, microwave weapons, water cannons, long-range acoustic devices (LRADs), acoustic hailing devices, and sound cannons. • Kinetic energy weapons and munitions.
• Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.

San Luis Obispo Police Department
San Luis Obispo PD CA Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2026/06/24, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by San Luis Obispo Police
Department
Military Equipment - 2
707.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the San Luis Obispo Police Department that members of this department comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071 with respect to to the approval for, acquisition, funding, and use of, and reporting regarding military equipment. 707.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police shall designate a member of this department to act as the Military Equipment Coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include, but are not limited to:
department
(a) Acting as liaison to City Council for matters related to the requirements of this policy. (b) Identifying department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Department, or the equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the governing body.
(c) Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. (d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of San Luis Obispo Police Department (Government Code § 7071). (e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:

1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.

2. Preparing for public questions regarding the department's funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
(f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police and ensuring that the report is made available on the department website (Government Code § 7072).
(g) Establishing the procedure for a person to register a complaint or concern, or how that person may submit a question about the use of a type of military equipment by the department, and how the Department will respond in a timely manner. 707.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The qualifying equipment for the Department islisted in Attachment A to this policy. 707.5 APPROVAL
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall obtain approval from City Council by way of an ordinance adopting the military equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed military equipment policy is submitted to the governing body and is available on the department website at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue (Government Code § 7071). The military

San Luis Obispo Police Department
San Luis Obispo PD CA Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2026/06/24, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by San Luis Obispo Police
Department
Military Equipment - 3
equipment policy must be approved by the governing body prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code § 7071):
(a) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a. (b) Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
(c) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
(d) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this department. (e) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the governing body.
(f) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.
(g) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above. 707.6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Military equipment in the possession of the department shall not be used by any other law enforcement agency or member in this jurisdiction unless the military equipment is approved for use in accordance with this policy.

This policy recognizes the need for agencies to provide assistance to each other, whether in ongoing, combined, or regional operations, occasional planned operations, or in exigent circumstances. Where applicable to the provisions of Government Code § 7070 through § 7075, such assisting agencies shall comply with their respective military equipment use policies when rendering assistance and with any directions for use of department military equipment given by department command.
707.7 EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES
This policy also recognizes that there may be very limited or extreme instances where incidents of extraordinary nature could demand the need for incident commanders to authorize Department personnel to use equipment not specified in this policy. This decision must be made depending on the totality of the circumstances, including due regard for the public's safety, officer safety, respecting civil rights, the seriousness of the situation, and other information available at that time.

Should such extreme instances occur that call for members of this Department to use equipment not specified in this policy, the incident commander shall, if practical, notify the Chief of Police via the chain of command prior to deploying such equipment and the use of such equipment shall be documented in an appropriate report. Should such circumstances occur, the Chief of Police, or his/her designee, shall notify the City Council as soon as practical, and document any such uses in the required annual report.

San Luis Obispo Police Department
San Luis Obispo PD CA Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2026/06/24, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by San Luis Obispo Police
Department
Military Equipment - 4
707.8 ANNUAL REPORT
Upon approval of a military equipment policy, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee should submit a military equipment report to the governing body for each type of military equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use (Government Code § 7072).

The Chief of Police or the authorized designee should also make each annual military equipment report publicly available on the department website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment in department inventory.

The annual military equipment report shall, at a minimum, include the following information for the immediately preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment:
(a) A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use. (b) A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment. (c) The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response. (d) The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report. (e) The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment. (f) If the department intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment.
707.9 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the Department should discuss the report and respond to public questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment. At the meeting, the Department shall discuss the report and respond to questions regarding the Department's funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment (Government Code §7072).
707.10 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COMPLAINT PROCESS
Trust and transparency to the community we serve is paramount to our community-oriented policing philosophy. Maintaining an active exchange of ideas and feedback is integral to the harmonization of this collaborative initiative. The most effective way to partner with our community on these important topics is to provide a safe and transparent means by which we listen to feedback and engage concerns on the necessary tools we are entrusted with to serve our

San Luis Obispo Police Department
San Luis Obispo PD CA Policy Manual
Military Equipment
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2026/06/24, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by San Luis Obispo Police
Department
Military Equipment - 5
community. Building and maintaining trust is predicated on first listening to concerns, giving a voice through dialogue, and swiftly acting on areas where we can improve.

Pursuant to 709.3 (g) of this policy, all formal complaints, questions, or inquiries received by the department, regardless of manner, pertaining to the use or misuse, possession, or acquisition of any item defined by this policy and/or AB 481 as Military Equipment shall be referred to Lexipol policy 1019 Personnel Complaints. Any complaint related to the misuse of Military Equipment is deemed in nature and will be investigated thoroughly and as expeditiously as possible and in accordance with the stringent procedures and processes as directed by Lexipol policy 1019.

Complaints received under 709.10 will be thoroughly documented and dispositions recorded per Lexipol policy 1019. All complaints, regardless of findings and/or disposition, shall be aggregated annually and reported to the Chief of Police for inclusion into the department's annual Military Equipment Report presented to Council.
707.11 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
See attachment: Policy 709 Military Use Equipment _ Attachment A.pdf

San Luis Obispo PD CA Policy Manual
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2026/06/24, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by San Luis Obispo Police
Department
Attachments - 6
Attachments

Attachment
San Luis Obispo PD CA Policy Manual
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2026/06/24, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by San Luis Obispo Police
Department
Policy 709 Military Use Equipment _
Attachment A.pdf - 7
Policy 709 Military Use Equipment _ Attachment A.pdf
Policy 709 Military Use Equipment _ Attachment A.pdf

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 1

MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY

1. Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS): An unmanned aircraft along with the associated equipment necessary to control it remotely.
a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost. i. DJI MAVIC MINI, cost: $500 each, quantity: 1. Miniature UAS that weighs approximately 249 grams and is able to record video and audio with approximately 30 minutes of flight time.
ii. DJI MAVIC ENTERPRISE DUAL, no cost, received a donation from the community which paid the entire $4,500 each, quantity: 1. UAS that has a color and inferred camera as well as audible speaker and light. Capable of video recording and weighs approximately 899 grams, approx. 30 minutes of flight time.
iii. DJI MAVIC ENTERPRISE DUAL ADVANCED, no cost, received County Homeland Security Grant that paid the entire $6,500 each, quantity: 1.

UAS that has a color and inferred camera as well as audible speaker and light. Capable of video recording and weighs approximately 899 grams, approx. 30 minutes of flight time.
b. Purpose
To be deployed when its view would assist officers or incident commanders with the following situations, which include but are not limited to:
i. Major collision investigations.
ii. Search for missing persons.
iii. Natural disaster management.
iv. Crime scene photography.
v. SWAT, tactical or other public safety and life preservation missions. vi. In response to specific requests from local, state, or federal fire authorities for fire response and/or prevention.
c. Authorized Use
Only assigned operators who have completed the required training and received a Part 107 Remote Pilot Certificate, shall be permitted to operate any UAS during approved missions.
d. Expected Life Span
All UAS equipment, 3-4 years.
e. Fiscal Impact
Annual maintenance and battery replacement cost is approximately $ 2,000.

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 2
f. Training
All Department UAS operators are licensed by the Federal Aviation Administration for UAS operation. In addition, each operator must attend training updates throughout the year.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules
Use is established under FAA Regulation 14 CFR Part 107, and department policy. It is the policy of the SLOPD to utilize UAS only for official law enforcement purposes, and in a manner that respects the privacy of our community, pursuant to State and Federal law.

2. Robots: A remotely controlled unmanned machine that operates on the ground, which is utilized to enhance the safety of the community and officers. a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost. i. ICOR TECHNOLOGIES, no cost, received Count Homeland Security Grant that paid the entire $64,000 each, quantity: 1. The ICOR Mini Caliber robot is designed for rapid tactical missions, the robot is simple to operate and quick to deploy for searching rooms, hallways, stairwells, and confined spaces. With rubber tracks and articulating front and rear flippers, the Mini-CALIBER effortlessly climbs stairs. It also includes an extendible rotating claw arm that simplifies opening door handles. b. Purpose
To be used to remotely gain visual/audio data, deliver the Crisis Negotiation Team (CNT) phone, open doors, and clear buildings.
c. Authorized Use
Only assigned operators who have completed the required training shall be permitted to operate the robots.
d. Expected Life Span
Robot, 8-10 years.
e. Fiscal Impact
Annual maintenance and battery replacement cost is approximately $ 1000.00 f. All robot operators receive inhouse training on the use and deployment of the robot. All robot operators are required to train monthly with the robot. g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the SLOPD to utilize a robot only for official law enforcement purposes, and in a manner that respects the privacy of our community, pursuant to State and Federal law.

3. Armored Vehicles: Commercially produced wheeled armored personnel vehicle utilized for law enforcement purposes.

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 3
a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost. i. LENCO BEARCAT, no cost, received Count Homeland Security Grant that paid the entire $156,000. The City had to pay a onetime vehicle registration fee of $13,000, quantity: 1. The Lenco Bearcat, is an armored vehicle that seats 10-12 personnel with open floor plan that allows for rescue of down personnel. It can stop various projectiles, which provides greater safety to citizens and officers beyond the protection level of shield and personal body armor.
b. Purpose
To be used in response to critical incidents to enhance officer and community safety, improve scene containment and stabilization, and assist in resolving critical incidents. c. Authorized Use
The use of armored vehicles shall only be authorized by a watch commander or SWAT commander, based on the specific circumstances of a given critical incident. Armored vehicles shall be used only by officers trained in their deployment and in a manner consistent with Department policy and training.
d. Expected Life Span
Lenco Bearcat 15 years
e. Fiscal Impact
Annual maintenance cost of approximately $4200.00
f. Training
All driver/operators shall attend formalized instruction and be trained in vehicle operations and practical driving instruction.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the Department to utilize armored vehicles only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law.

4. Mobile Incident Command Vehicle (MIC): A vehicle used mobile office that provides shelter, access to Department computer systems, and restroom facilities during extended events.
a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost. i. 2011 PACE AMERICAN, no cost, trailer was donated by the City of Arroyo Grande covering the entire estimated cost of $30,000. The City had to pay $ 50,000 to outfit as a MIC, quantity: 1. The MIC can also be utilized for SWAT/CNT and other critical incidents, preplanned large events, searching for missing persons, natural disasters, and community events.

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 4
b. Purpose
To be used based on the specific circumstances of a given critical incident, large event, natural disaster or community event that is taking place. c. Authorized Use
Only officers trained in their deployment and operations in a manner consistent with Department policy and training are authorized to operate the MIC. Situations which the MIC is authorized for use would include but not be limited to critical incidents, emergencies and natural disasters.
d. Lifespan
The MIC, 20-year lifespan on trailer structure. IT upgrades needed every 5-7 years to maintain systems.
e. Fiscal Impact
Annual maintenance cost is approximately $2000.00
f. Training
The driver/operator shall receive training in the safe towing and handling of the vehicle. g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the Department to use the MIC only for official law enforcement purposes, and in accordance with California State law regarding the operation of motor vehicles.

5. 40 MM Launchers and Rounds: 40MM Launchers are utilized by department personnel as a less lethal tool to launch impact rounds.
a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost. i. DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM SINGLE SHOT LAUNCHER, #1425, cost $1100 each, quantity: 20. The 40MM Single Launcher is a tactical single shot launcher that features an expandable ROGERS Super Stoc and an adjustable Integrated Front Grip (IFG) with light rail. It will fire standard 40mm less lethal ammunition, up to 4.8 inches in cartridge length. It will launch a 40MM less lethal round up to 131 feet and is only authorized to be used by officers who have received training from POST certified instructor.
ii. DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM CS FERRET, cost $23 per round, quantity: 16. The ferret round is deployed from a 40mm launcher and contains CS gas. The ferret is used to deploy CS gas from a safe distance.
iii. DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM EXTENDED RANGE DIRECT
IMPACT, cost $18 per round, quantity: 48. A less lethal light weight expanding foam projectile used for longer distances.

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 5
iv. BYRNA, 40MM DIRECT IMPACT BIP ROUND, cost $23 per round, quantity: 110. A less lethal light weight expanding foam projectile. b. Purpose
To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable.
c. Authorized Use
Situations for use of the less lethal weapon systems may include, but are not limited to:
i. Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. ii. Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
iii. Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. iv. Potentially vicious animals.
v. Training exercises or approved demonstrations.
d. Lifespan
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM SINGLE SHOT LAUNCHER, #1425 – 15 years.

DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM CS FERRET – 5 years.

DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, 40MM EXTENDED RANGE DIRECT – 5 years.

BYRNA, 40MM DIRECT IMPACT BIP ROUND – 5 years.
e. Fiscal Impact
Annual maintenance is approximately $10 for each launcher.

No annual maintenance for munitions.
f. Training
Sworn members utilizing 40MM less lethal chemical agents or impact rounds are trained in there use by POST certified less lethal and chemical agents’ instructors. g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the SLOPD to utilize the 40mm only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.

6. 40MM Launching Cup: Cups that attaches to 12 gauge less lethal shotguns which allow officers to launch canisters of chemical agents or smoke. a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost. i. COMBINED SYSTEMS LC5 Gas LAUNCHING CUP, cost $300 each, quantity 1. The LC5 Launching cups can be attached to virtually any 12ga

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 6
shotgun and the munition is launched with our Safariland model 1210 launching cartridge.
b. Purpose
To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable.
c. Authorized Use
Situations for use of the less lethal weapon systems may include, but are not limited to:
i. Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. ii. Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
iii. Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. iv. Potentially vicious animals.
v. Training exercises or approved demonstrations.
d. Lifespan
Combined Systems LC5 40MM Launching Cup - 25 years.
e. Fiscal Impact
No annual maintenance.
f. Training
Officers utilizing the launching cups are trained by POST certified chemical agents instructors.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the SLOPD to utilize the 40mm only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.

7. Distraction Devices: A device used to distract dangerous persons. a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost. i. DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, model 8902 Distraction Device, cost $90 each, quantity: 14. A low roll distraction device that produces a loud bang with a bright light. Ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during a hostage rescue, room entry or other high-risk arrest situations. ii. LIBERTY DYNAMIC, Reloadable Noise Flash Diversion Device, cost $130 each, quantity: 12. A low roll distraction device that produces a loud bang with a bright light. Ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during a hostage rescue, room entry or other high-risk arrest situations.

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 7
iii. LIBERTY DYNAMIC, Reload for Noise Flash Diversion Device, cost $45 each, quantity: 24. This is the reload for the distraction device once it has been used.
iii. COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, model 7290-9 Distraction Device, cost $210 each, quantity: 11. A low roll distraction device that produces nine separate loud bangs with a bright light. Ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during a hostage rescue, room entry or other highrisk arrest situations. b. Purpose
A distraction device is ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during assaults, hostage rescue, room entry or other high-risk arrest situations. To produce atmospheric overpressure and brilliant white light and, as a result, can cause short-term (6 - 8 seconds) physiological/psychological sensory deprivation to give officers a tactical advantage. c. Authorized Use
Diversionary Devices shall only be used:
i. By officers who have been trained in their proper use. ii. In hostage and barricaded subject situations.
iii. In high-risk warrant (search/arrest) services where there may be extreme hazards to officers.
iv. During other high-risk situations where their use would enhance officer safety.
v. During training exercises.
d. Lifespan
DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY, model 8902 Distraction Device - 5 years.

LIBERTY DYNAMIC, Noise Flash Diversion Device – 5 years.

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, model 7290-9 Distraction Device – 5 years e. Fiscal Impact
No annual maintenance.
f. Training
Prior to use, officers must attend divisionary device training that is conducted by Post certified instructors.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the SLOPD to utilize diversion devices only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 8

8. Rifles: Guns that are fired from shoulder level, having a long spirally grooved barrel intended to make bullets spin and thereby have greater accuracy over a long distance. a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost. i. Barrett .50 Caliber rifle, Model 82A1M, no cost, rifle was donated covering the entire estimated cost of $8500 each, quantity: 1. A semi-automatic rifle used by officers assigned to the SWAT team as snipers. The use of the rifle is reserved for disabling a vehicle in incidents where lethal force is justified, and no other reasonable means exist to stop the vehicle to protect innocent life.
ii. Barret .50 Caliber Ammunition, M33 661gr rifle round, cost $10 per round, quantity 70. A FMJ bullet designed to penetrate barriers. iii. Daniel Defense .308 caliber rifle, Model DD5, cost $4,500 each, quantity:

2. A highly accurate and durable semi-automatic rifle used by officers assigned to the SWAT team as snipers.
iv. Hornady .308 Caliber Ammunition, 168gr ELD TAP, cost $1.25 per round, quantity: 1800. A highly accurate round designed to penetrate common barriers but prevent overpenetration.
v. Heckler & Koch 9mm SMG, Model MP5, cost $2,500 each, quantity 6. A full-automatic submachine gun that fires a pistol cartridge. It has a barrel longer than a pistol, but shorter than a rifle, which provides a trained SWAT officer better control inside of structure with greater accuracy than a handgun.
vi. Hornady 9mm Ammunition, 135gr Critical Duty, cost $0.56 per round, quantity: 7000. This ammo features a specially designed hollow-point tip that reliably expand while passing through a variety of barriers. vii. Winchester 9mm Ammunition, 115g FMJ, cost $0.35 per round, quantity:
13000. This ammunition is designed for range practice and provides a reliable round at a cost-effective price.
viii. Colt 5.56 caliber rifle, Model M4, cost $1,900 each, quantity 9. A fullautomatic rifle that fires an intermediate-power cartridge (5.56) which is more powerful than a standard pistol but less powerful than a standard rifle. It is a short-barreled rifle which provides a trained SWAT officer better control inside of structures with greater accuracy than a handgun. ix. Colt 5.56 caliber rifle, Model AR-15, cost $1,800 each, quantity 55. A semi-automatic rifle that fires an intermediate-power cartridge (5.56) which is more powerful than a standard pistol but less powerful than a standard rifle. It is a short-barreled rifle which provides a trained officer better control inside of structures with greater accuracy than a handgun. x. Hornady 5.56 Ammunition, 75gr TAP SBR, cost $0.85 per round, quantity: 5200. This ammo features a specially designed bullet that

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 9
reliably expand while passing through a variety of barriers, without overpenetration. The powder is specially formulated to work in short, barreled rifles.
xi. Winchester .223 Ammunition, 55g FMJ, cost $0.20 per round, quantity:
9500. This ammunition is designed for range practice and provides a reliable round at a cost-effective price.
b. Purpose
To be used as precision weapons to address a threat with more precision and/or greater distances than a handgun, if present and feasible.
c. Authorized Use
Only members that are POST certified are authorized to use a rifle. d. Lifespan
Barrett .50 Caliber rifle, Model 82A1M - 15 years.

Barret .50 Caliber Ammunition, M33 661gr rifle round – 5 years.

Daniel Defense .308 caliber rifle, Model DD5 – 15 years.

Hornady .308 Caliber Ammunition, 168gr ELD TAP – 5 years.

Heckler & Koch 9mm SMG, Model MP5 – 15 years.

Hornady 9mm Ammunition, 135gr Critical Duty – 5 years.

Winchester 9mm Ammunition, 115g FMJ – 5 years.

Colt 5.56 caliber rifle, Model M4 – 15 years.

Colt 5.56 caliber rifle, Model AR-15 – 15 years.

Hornady 5.56 Ammunition, 75gr TAP SBR – 5 years.

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, model 7290-9 Distraction Device – 5 years.

Winchester .223 Ammunition, 55g FMJ – 5 years.
e. Fiscal Impact
Annual maintenance is approximately $20 for each firearm.

No annual maintenance for ammunition.
f. Training
Prior to using a rifle, officers must be certified by POST instructors in the operation of the rifle. Additionally, all members that operate any rifle are required to pass a range qualification two times a year.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 10
It is the policy of the SLOPD to utilize rifles only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

9. Chemical Agent and Smoke Canisters: Canisters that contain chemical agents that are released when deployed.
a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost. i. COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, SMOKE CANISTER (5210 B), cost $38 each, quantity: 18. When deployed, the canister emits a cloud of smoke used to cover or conceal movement. The canister is baffled to reduce the risk of fire and is indoor safe.
ii. COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, Triple-PHASER CS CANISTER (5231), cost $44 each, quantity: 33. The canister consists of three separate canisters pressed together with separating charges between each. When deployed, the canisters separate and land approximately 20 feet apart allowing for an increased dispersal area of CS gas. The canister is designed for outdoor use in crowd control situations. iii. COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, Riot CS Canister (5230), cost $40 each, quantity: 34. When deployed the canister emits CS gas. The canister is designed for outdoor use or indoor use with a burn safe. iv. COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, Baffled Riot CS Canister (5230B), $40 each, quantity: 6. When deployed the canister emits CS gas. The canister is designed for outdoor use or indoor use. The canister is baffled to reduce the risk of fire and is indoor safe. This canister can be used with the COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS LC5 Launcher to deploy gas from a safe distance.
b. Purpose
To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for use of the less lethal weapon systems may include, but are not limited to:
i. Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. ii. Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
iii. Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained. iv. Potentially vicious animals.
v. Training exercises or approved demonstrations.
c. Authorized Use
Only officers who have received POST certification in the use chemical agents are authorized to use chemical agents.
d. Lifespan

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 11
COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, SMOKE CANISTER (5210 B) - 5 years.

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, Triple-PHASER CS CANISTER (5231) – 5 years.

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, Riot CS Canister (5230) – 5 years.

COMBINED TACTICAL SYSTEMS, Baffled Riot CS Canister (5230B) – 5 years. e. Fiscal Impact
No annual maintenance
f. Training
Sworn members utilizing chemical agent canisters are certified by POST less lethal and chemical agents instructors.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the SLOPD to utilize chemical agents only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.

10. PepperBall Launcher: A device that discharges irritant projectiles. a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost. i. PEPPERBALL SX LAUNCHER, cost $950 each, quantity: 5. The SX is a compressed-air powered launcher designed to fire non-lethal PepperBall projectiles.
ii. PEPPERBALL LIVE PROJECTILE, cost $2.38 per round, quantity: 1200.

The LIVE projectile contains 2% PAVA pepper powder, and is designed for direct impact and area saturation, especially in confined, interior spaces. Discharged from a PepperBall Launcher, the projectile has a velocity of 280-350 FPS. The projectile has a direct impact of 60ft and an area of saturation of 150+ft. The projectile contains 0.5% PAVA Powder. iii. PEPPERBALL GLASS BREAKER PROJECTLE, cost $2.90 per round, quantity: 50. The GLASS BREAKER is designed to break glass in tactical situations. Discharged from a PepperBall Launcher it is loaded one at a time.
b. Purpose
To limit the escalation of conflict where employment of lethal force is prohibited or undesirable. Situations for use of the less lethal weapon systems may include but are not limited to:
i. Self-destructive, dangerous and/or combative individuals. ii. Riot/crowd control and civil unrest incidents.
iii. Circumstances where a tactical advantage can be obtained.

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 12
iv. Potentially vicious animals.
v. Training exercises or approved demonstrations.
c. Authorized Use
Only those officers who have been trained in the use of PepperBall launchers are authorized to use the PepperBall launchers.
d. Lifespan
PEPPERBALL SX LAUNCHER - 15 years.

PEPPERBALL LIVE PROJECTILE – 5 years.

PEPPERBALL GLASS BREAKER PROJECTLE – 5 years.
e. Fiscal Impact
Annual maintenance is approximately $25 for each launcher.

No annual maintenance for munitions.
f. Training
Sworn members utilizing PepperBall launchers and projectiles are trained in there use by POST certified less lethal and chemical agents instructors. g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the SLOPD to utilize PepperBall only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law, including those regarding the use of force.

11. Shotgun Breaching Tools: Tools that are used to conduct an explosive breach. a. Description, quantity, capabilities, and purchase cost. i. REMINGTON 870 EXPRESS BREACHING SHOTGUN, cost $800 each, quantity: 1. This weapon allows for breachers to safely utilize shotgun breaching rounds in order to destroy deadbolts, locks, and hinges. The stand-off that is attached to the end of the barrel allows for positive placement of the gun into the correct position and vents gases to prevent overpressure.
ii. BENELLI M4 BREACHING SHOTGUN, cost $1,900 each, quantity: 1.

This weapon allows for breachers to safely utilize shotgun breaching rounds in order to destroy deadbolts, locks, and hinges. The stand-off that is attached to the end of the barrel allows for positive placement of the gun into the correct position and vents gases to prevent overpressure. iii. ROYAL ARMS TESAR-2 BACK CAP 425 GRAIN COPPER FRANGILBE BREACHING ROUND, cost $4.50 per round, quantity: 94. The round is

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 13
fired from a breaching shotgun and is used to destroy deadbolts, locks and hinges.
b. Purpose
To safely gain entry into a structure.
c. Authorized Use
Shotgun breaching may only occur after authorization by the Incident Commander or SWAT Commander in the field, and during training exercises. d. Lifespan
REMINGTON 870 EXPRESS BREACHING SHOTGUN - 15 years.

BENELLI M4 BREACHING SHOTGUN – 15 years.

ROYAL ARMS TESAR-2 FRANGILBE BREACHING ROUND – 5 years. e. Fiscal Impact
Annual maintenance is approximately $10 for each shotgun.

No annual maintenance for munitions.
f. Training
All officers who use shotgun breaching tools shall be certified by POST instructors in the operation and use of shotgun breaching.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the SLOPD to utilize breaching tools only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law.

12. Defense Logistics Disposition (DLA) Services (formerly DRMO) Equipment:

Reutilized equipment donated to state and local governments as well as law enforcement agencies. The following items were received from the military at no cost.

1. Detachable weapon magazines
a. Description, quantity, and capabilities.
i. COLT 30 round magazines chambered for .233/5.56 caliber rifles, quantity: 533.
b. Purpose
These magazines are for use with Department issued AR-15 rifles. c. Authorized Use
Only members that are POST certified are authorized to use an issued AR-15 rifle may be issued these magazines.

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 14
d. Lifespan
Approximately 10 years
e. Fiscal Impact
None. Once they are not functional, they will be returned to the military or disposed of.
f. Training
These magazines are used in conjunction with the issuing and training of officers in the AR-15 rifle.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the SLOPD to utilize these magazines only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

2. Reflex rifle sights
a. Description, quantity, and capabilities.
i. AIM POINT Reflex Optics, quantity: 80. A reflector sight or reflex sight is an optical sight that allows the user to look through a partially reflecting glass viewer to identify where a weapon system is pointed. It is the primary aiming device for modern rifles. b. Purpose
A safer and more accurate sighting system for rifles.
c. Authorized Use
Only members that are POST certified are authorized to use a rifle equipped with a reflex sighting system.
d. Lifespan
Approximately 10-15 years
e. Fiscal Impact
None. Once they are not functional, they will be returned to the military or disposed of.
f. Training
Officers are trained in the use of these optics in conjunction with being certified by a POST instructor in the operation of the rifle it is affixed to. g. Legal and Procedural Rules

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 15
It is the policy of the SLOPD to utilize these optics only for official law enforcement purposes.

3. Backup rifle iron sights
a. Description, quantity, and capabilities.
i. MAG-PULL flip-up rear sights, quantity: 60. Back-up sighting system.
b. Purpose
Foldable rear sight for aiming a rifle in the event the electronic optic fails. c. Authorized Use
Only members that are POST certified are authorized to use a rifle that is equipped with this rear sight.
d. Lifespan
Approximately 10-15 years
e. Fiscal Impact
None. Once they are not functional, they will be returned to the military or disposed of.
f. Training
Officers are trained in the use of these sights in conjunction with being certified by a POST instructor in the operation of the rifle it is affixed to. g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the SLOPD to only utilize these sights official law enforcement purposes.

4. Laser range finder
a. Description, quantity, and capabilities.
i. Laser range finder, quantity: 3. The range finder determines the distance between two points so calculations can be made to determine trajectory of rounds fired by a precision rifle team member.
b. Purpose
A laser range finder is a distance measuring tool.
c. Authorized Use

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 16
Only members that are POST certified in the use of a long-range rifle are authorized to use a laser range finder in conjunction with their assigned rifle system.
d. Lifespan
Approximately 10-15 years
e. Fiscal Impact
None. Once they are not functional, they will be returned to the military, and we will source a replacement through the DLA.
f. Training
Officers are trained in the use of these laser range finders in conjunction with being certified by a POST instructor in the operation of the long-range rifle system.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the SLOPD to utilize these laser range finders only for official law enforcement purposes.

5. Infrared transmitter
a. Description, quantity, and capabilities.
i. Infrared transmitters are small blinking infrared lights that attach to a 9-volt battery, quantity: 80. Infrared transmitters emit an infrared light that can be seen using night vision illuminators. b. Purpose
Infrared transmitters are used by tactical teams in conjunction with night vision equipment. The transmitters are used to identify objects and/or locations that can only be seen with the use of night vision equipment. c. Authorized Use
Only members that trained in the use of night vision equipment are authorized to use the infrared transmitters.
d. Lifespan
Approximately 10-15 years
e. Fiscal Impact
None. Once they are not functional, they will be returned to the military, and we will source a replacement through the DLA.
f. Training

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 17
Use of infrared transmitters are deployed at the direction of the SWAT team commander for use during tactical operations. Officers deploying the Infrared transmitters receive periodic training in the proper deployment of the transmitters. g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the SLOPD to utilize these infrared transmitters only for official law enforcement purposes.

6. Image intensifier, (Night vision)
a. Description, quantity, and capabilities.
i. Night vision goggles, quantity: 4. Night vision allows officers to see in low light conditions.
b. Purpose
Used by SWAT in low light conditions during critical incidents when traditional lighting tools such as flashlights would be unsafe to use. c. Authorized Use
Only members trained in the use of night vision equipment are authorized to use the equipment. These devices are assigned to SWAT and are used at the direction of the SWAT commander.
d. Lifespan
Approximately 10 years
e. Fiscal Impact
None. Once they are not functional, they will be returned to the military, and we will source a replacement through the DLA.
f. Training
Prior to using night vision, officers receive POST approved training in the operation of night vision. Additionally, all members that deploy night vision equipment train with them several times each year.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the SLOPD to utilize night vision only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

7. Toxicological Agents Protective Coveralls
a. Description, quantity, and capabilities.
i. Rubber coated coveralls, quantity: 20. Coveralls used to protect officers during an incident involving chemical/biological contaminants

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 18
b. Purpose
Toxicological Agents Protective Coveralls are used by officers to protect against chemical/biological contaminated environments.
c. Authorized Use
Members of the Department are authorized to use the protective equipment during their response to any situation where chemical/biological contaminants are suspected.
d. Lifespan
Approximately 10 - 15 years
e. Fiscal Impact
None. Once they are not functional, they will be returned to the military, and we will source a replacement through the DLA.
f. Training
Officers are trained in the proper use of the protective coveralls on a five-year rotation.
g. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the SLOPD to utilize this protective equipment for official law enforcement purposes.

8. Illuminator, Target Pointer, Aiming Laser
a. Description, quantity, and capabilities.
i. EOTECH laser aiming device, quantity: 18. This is a multifunction visible and infrared laser aiming device with laser illuminator.
b. Purpose
The laser aiming device is used by SWAT members who are deploying a rifle while using night vision goggles. When using night vision, it becomes the primary aiming device for a rifle.
c. Authorized Use
Only members of SWAT who have received training in the proper use of the aiming device are authorized to use a rifle equipped with a EOTECH laser aiming device.
d. Lifespan
Approximately 10-15 years
e. Fiscal Impact

Policy 709: Military Equipment
Attachment A
Attachment A - Page 19
None. Once they are not functional, they will be returned to the military, and we will source a replacement through the DLA.
d. Training
Prior to using the sights, officers must be certified by POST instructors in the operation of the rifle the laser aiming device is affixed to. Additionally, all members that operate any rifle are required to pass a range qualification two times a year.
e. Legal and Procedural Rules
It is the policy of the SLOPD to utilize laser aiming devices only for official law enforcement purposes, and pursuant to State and Federal law regarding the use of force.

6 Item 6e
Department: Public Works
Cost Center: 5009
For Agenda of: 9/1/2026
Placement: Consent
Estimated Time: NA
FROM: Scott Collins, Assistant City Manager
Prepared By: Matt Horn, Major City Projects Manager
SUBJECT: SECOND READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND TITLE 13, CHAPTER 13.12 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH
UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 17 WITHIN THE PRADO

ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT LIMITS

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Ordinance No. 1758 (2026 Series) entitled, “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, amending Section 13.12.040 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code to Establish a New Underground Utility District 17.” (Attachment A)

POLICY CONTEXT
Chapter 13.12 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code establishes the process for creating underground utility districts. Section 13.12.030 requires adoption of an ordinance and formal notification of affected property owners before overhead utility facilities may be converted to underground service. Final adoption of the ordinance memorializes the City Council’s policy direction provided during the first reading.

Underground Utility District No. 17 also advances the City’s adopted goals for infrastructure, sustainable transportation, climate resilience, and neighborhood livability by coordinating utility improvements with a major multimodal transportation project and improving the reliability, safety, and appearance of the Prado Road corridor.

On August 4, 2026, the City Council introduced the ordinance establishing Underground Utility District No. 17. The ordinance is now before the Council for second reading and final adoption.

DISCUSSION
Background
The City has established sixteen underground utility districts since 1972, typically in conjunction with new development or major corridor improvements. Underground Utility

Item 6e
District No. 17 would encompass the limits identified for utility conversion within the Prado Road Interchange Project, Specification No. 2091613.

The Prado Road Interchange Project will construct a new Prado Road overcrossing of US 101, reconstruct the northbound interchange ramps, add a northbound auxiliary lane between Prado Road and Madonna Road, realign Elks Lane, widen Prado Road, and provide new bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Several existing overhead utility poles and lines conflict with the proposed roadway geometry, bridge structures, retaining walls, landscaping, and multimodal facilities.

Previous Council or Advisory Body Action
On August 4, 2026, following the required public hearing, the City Council introduced the ordinance establishing Underground Utility District No. 17 within the Prado Road Interchange Project limits. Final adoption will complete the legislative action required by Municipal Code Chapter 13.12. The ordinance will become effective 30 days after final passage, subject to its publication requirements.

Public Engagement
The Prado Road Interchange Project has included public workshops, community meetings, advisory body presentations, project website updates, environmental review circulation, and stakeholder coordination. As required by Municipal Code Section

13.12.030, notice of the proposed underground utility district was mailed to potentially affected property owners and published in The New Times at least 30 days before the August 4, 2026 public hearing. Utility providers have also been informed of the City’s intent and will continue participating in utility coordination during final design.

CONCURRENCE
The Community Development, Public Works, and Utilities Departments concur with the recommended action. Affected utility providers will continue coordinating with the City and project design team during the Plans, Specifications and Estimates phase.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Interchange Project was evaluated under the California Environmental Quality Act through an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and under the National Environmental Policy Act through a Categorical Exclusion, with Caltrans serving as the lead agency. Environmental revalidation will be completed with the Supplemental Project Report to confirm that final design refinements remain consistent with the approved environmental documents. Final adoption of the ordinance establishes the administrative district needed to implement utility undergrounding and does not independently authorize construction beyond the environmentally reviewed project.

Item 6e

FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: Yes Budget Year: 2025-27
Funding Identified: Yes
Fiscal Analysis:

Funding
Sources
Total Budget
Available
Current
Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing
Cost
General Fund $ $ $ $
State
Federal
Fees
Capital Outlay
(SLR)
$9,000,000 $0 $9,000,000 NA
Total $9,000,000 $0 $9,000,000 $NA
Adoption of the ordinance does not appropriate additional funding or increase the Interchange Project budget. Current project estimates include approximately $9 million for relocation of electrical, communication, natural gas, water, sewer, and petroleum facilities throughout the broader interchange project. This amount includes work beyond the overhead facilities subject to District No. 17. The final undergrounding cost and allocation of responsibility will be refined through utility design and coordination. PG&E is expected to provide an overhead-reconstruction credit, and the City will be responsible for eligible incremental undergrounding costs beyond that credit.

ALTERNATIVES
Decline Final Adoption of the Underground Utility District 17. The City Council could decline to adopt the ordinance and direct staff to coordinate relocation of affected facilities while retaining overhead service. Staff does not recommend this alternative because it would require additional poles within the interchange corridor, increase conflicts with sidewalks, bicycle facilities, landscaping, and retaining walls, reduce utility resilience, diminish the visual quality of a major City gateway, and require redesign of portions of the project.

ATTACHMENTS
A - Ordinance No. 1758 (2026 Series)
B - Proposed Underground Utility District No. 17 Overview Map C - PG&E Franchise Agreement (1978)

O ______
ORDINANCE NO. 1758 (2026 SERIES)

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 13.12.040 OF THE SAN

LUIS OBISPO MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH A NEW
UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT 17
WHEREAS, The City of San Luis Obispo wishes to improve the resiliency and appearance of the City by the removal of overhead utilities; and WHEREAS, the limits of the Prado Interchange Project, Specification 2091613 (Project) will require significant overhead utility work during construction; and, WHEREAS, the City and overhead utility purveyors will be able to share undergrounding costs; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo as follows:

SECTION 1. The following Subsection 16 of Section 13.12.040 of the San Luis Obispo Municipal Code is hereby added to establish Underground District 17:

17. That portion of Prado Road in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, described as follows:

COMMENCING at a point on the centerline of Higuera Street that bears South 27° 41' 25" West, 161.18 feet from a found brass pin in monument well marking the intersection of the centerline of Higuera Street with the centerline of the Higuera Street Cul-de-sac as shown on the Record of Survey filed in Book 114 of Records of Surveys at page 89 and on the map of Higuera Commerce Park Tract No. 703 filed in Book 10 of Maps at page 50, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, from which said brass pin, a found pin in monument well marking the intersection of the centerline of Higuera Street with the centerline of Tank Farm Road as shown on said maps, bears South 27° 41' 25" West, 798.90 feet [South 26° 09' 20" West 798.84 feet per said record of survey]; Thence North 62° 18' 35" West, 42.00 feet to the northwesterly line of Higuera Street; Thence along said line and along the northwesterly line of the offer to dedicate described in the document recorded in Volume 3020 of Official Records at page 1 in the Office of the County Recorder of said County North 27° 41' 44", East 709.93 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left, having a radius of 20.00 feet;
Thence continuing along line and along the southwesterly line of Prado Road, 84 feet wide, along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 90° 37' 00" a distance of 31.63 feet;

Ordinance No. _____ (2026 Series) Page 2
O ______
Thence continuing along the southwesterly line of Prado Road North 62° 55' 10" West, 588.88 feet to a point on the northwesterly prolongation of the south line of the “24’ strip to be dedicated to City of San Luis Obispo” shown on Parcel Map SLO-71-178 filed in Book 6 of Parcel Maps at page 70, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County; POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence continuing along the southwesterly line of Prado Road, North 62° 55' 08" West, 1035.46 feet to the easterly right of way line of State Highway 101 as shown on the State of California Transportation Agency, Department of Public Works, Division of Highways – District 5, Right of Way Map 05-SLO-101 at post mile 26.9 on Sheet 31 of 32 sheets on file at the District 5 Office;
Thence along said easterly right of way the following two courses:

Thence South 88° 05' 27”, East 56.44 feet to an angle point located 300 feet right of station 718+46.90 as shown on said right of way map;
Thence North 27° 46' 34” West, 60.00 feet to an angle point located 300 feet right of station 719+06.90 as shown on said right of way map and to the northeasterly right of way line of said Prado Road marked by a nail and tag inscribed “LS 4819” in concrete as shown on the Record of Survey filed in Book 65 of Licensed Surveys at page 41 in said Office of the County Recorder;
Thence along said northeasterly right of way line, South 62° 55' 08” East, 1052.37 feet to the southwesterly corner of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. SLO-73-495 filed in Book 14 of Parcel Maps at Page 4 in said Office of the County Recorder; Thence South 66° 21' 48" West, 108.52’ to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

The Basis of Bearings for this description is the City of San Luis Obispo horizontal control network, January 2007, between control #8110 and control #8114, having a calculated bearing of South 30º 05’ 40” East. Designated points are published in a control inventory on file with the City of San Luis Obispo.

Containing 86,165 square feet more or less.

Also including that portion of Elks Lane in the City of San Luis Obispo, County of San Luis Obispo, State of California, described as follows:

COMMENCING at a nail and tag inscribed “LS 4819” in concrete marking the northerly corner of the northeasterly right of way line of Prado Road as shown on the Record of Survey filed in Book 65 at Page 41 of Licensed Surveys in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, marking the angle point on the easterly right of way line of State

Ordinance No. _____ (2026 Series) Page 3
O ______
Highway 101, located 300.00 feet right of station 719+06.90 as shown on the State of California Transportation Agency, Department of Public Works, Division of Highways – District 5, Right of Way Map 05-SLO-101 at post mile 26.9 on Sheet 31 of 32 sheets on file at the District 5 Office;
Thence along said easterly right of way line North 16° 17' 06" West, 111.30 feet to an angle point marking the southeasterly corner of the land described in Parcel One of the Relinquishment of State Highway to the County of San Luis Obispo, Road V-SLO-2-E filed in Book 1258 of Official Records at page 19 in the Office of the County Recorder of said County, and the POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence northeasterly along the easterly line of said Parcel, North 18° 03' 55" East, 108.77 feet;
Thence leaving said Parcel line, North 72° 02' 18" West, 55.00 feet to said State Highway easterly right of way line;
Thence southerly along said right of way line the following three courses:

South 17° 57' 05" West, 22.21 feet;
South 35° 26' 34" West, 104.94 feet;
South 80° 57' 04" East, 87.38 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

The Basis of Bearings for this description is the City of San Luis Obispo horizontal control network, January 2007, between control #8110 and control #8114, having a calculated bearing of South 30º 05’ 40” East. Designated points are published in a control inventory on file with the City of San Luis Obispo.

Containing 7,706 square feet more or less.

Property owners shall be prepared to receive underground services by June 30, 2029.

Overhead facilities shall be removed from public property by June 30, 2035.

Property owners shall not incur any costs required for conversions.

SECTION 2. A summary of this ordinance, approved by the City Attorney, together with names of the Council Members voting for and against it, shall be published at least five days prior to its final passage, in a newspaper published and circulated in this City.

This ordinance will go into effect at the expiration of thirty days after its final passage.

Ordinance No. _____ (2026 Series) Page 4
O ______
INTRODUCED on the 4th day of August, 2026, AND FINALLY ADOPTED by the Council of the City of San Luis Obispo on the 18th day of August, 2026, on the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
___________________________
Mayor Erica A. Stewart
ATTEST:
_______________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________
J. Christine Dietrick
City Attorney
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of San Luis Obispo, California, on ______________________. ___________________________
Teresa Purrington
City Clerk

DUONG
053-051-033

JK DEWAR
PROPERTIES L.P.

SOUTH HIGUERA STREET

POINT OF BEGINNING

POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
S 62° 18' 35" E 42.00'
S 66° 21' 48" W 108.52' PRADO ROAD
053-041-067
PARCEL 2 - 68/PM/66
WALTER BROS.

CONSTRUCTION CO. INC 053-041-066 PARCEL 1 - 14/PM/4 WALTER BROS. CONSTRUCTION CO. INC 053-051-067

CITY OF SLO
053-051-072

CITY OF SLO
LOT 1
17 MB 71
PARCEL 1
SLAL-91-102
50 PM 51
PARCEL 2
SLAL-91-102
50 PM 51
4018 OR 380
114 LS 89
∆=90° 37' 00" L=31.63' R=20.00'
S 62° 55' 10" E 588.88'
S 27° 41' 44" W 709.93'
161.18'

MONUMENT
PER 114/RS/89
T 805 544-4011 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
612 CLARION COURT www.wallacegroup.us F 805 544-4294 DRAWING :

DRAWN BY:

JOB No. :

DATE :

SCALE : ® EXHIBIT "____"

UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT

COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA
SHEET 1 OF 2 OF EXHIBIT "____"
1479-0007
1479-0007-LEGL-PRDO
NS
04/15/26
1" = 150'
0 150' 300'
(IN FEET)
75'

GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 150 FT
N
S 27° 41' 25" W 798.90'

MONUMENT
PER 114/RS/89

LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA
86,165 SQUARE FEET ±

FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
LEGEND
For Review 04/15/2026 10:01:20 AM
A
3 A

NAIL AND TAG INSCRIBED "LS 4819"
(65 LS 41)
053-041-071 SAN LUIS OBISPO REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY 053-041-072 COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SLO, INC. 053-041-036 COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SLO, INC. 053-041-078 COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF SLO, INC. 053-041-077 ERB 053-041-076

CITY OF SLO
4' WIDE STRIP
053-041-032
PARCEL 1 - 14/PM/04

PRADO PM LLC
053-051-033

JK DEWAR
PROPERTIES L.P.
053-051-045

CITY OF SLO

PRADO ROAD

POINT OF BEGINNING
N 62° 55' 08" W 1035.46'
S 88° 05' 27" E 56.44'
N 27° 46' 34" E 60.00'
S 62° 55' 08" E 1052.37'
S 66° 21' 48" W 108.52'
STATE HIGHWAY 101

ELKS LANE
T 805 544-4011 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
612 CLARION COURT www.wallacegroup.us F 805 544-4294 DRAWING :

DRAWN BY:

JOB No. :

DATE :

SCALE : ® EXHIBIT "____"

UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT

COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA
SHEET 2 OF 2 OF EXHIBIT "____"
1479-0007
1479-0007-LEGL-PRDO
NS
04/15/26
1" = 150'

LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA
86,165 SQUARE FEET ±

FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
LEGEND
0 150' 300'
(IN FEET)
75'

GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 150 FT
N
For Review 04/15/2026 10:01:20 AM A
3 A

POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
NAIL AND TAG INSCRIBED "LS 4819"
(65 LS 41)
053-041-071 SAN LUIS OBISPO REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY

PRADO ROAD
STATE HIGHWAY 101

POINT OF BEGINNING
N 18° 03' 55" E 108.77'
S 17° 57' 05" W 22.21'
S 35° 26' 34" W 104.94'
S 80° 57' 04" E 87.38'
N 16° 17' 06" W 111.30'

ELKS LANE
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
N 72° 02' 18" W 55.00'
T 805 544-4011 SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA 93401
612 CLARION COURT www.wallacegroup.us F 805 544-4294 DRAWING :

DRAWN BY:

JOB No. :

DATE :

SCALE : ® EXHIBIT "____"

UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT

COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO, CA
SHEET 1 OF 1 OF EXHIBIT "____"
1479-0007
1479-0007-LEGL-ELKS
NS
04/15/26
1" = 150'

LEGAL DESCRIPTION AREA
7,706 SQUARE FEET ±

FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED
LEGEND
0 150' 300'
(IN FEET)
75'

GRAPHIC SCALE
1 IN = 150 FT
N
For Review 04/15/2026 10:01:20 AM 3
A
3 A

ORDINANCE NO . 767 (1978 Series )

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO

GRANTING TO PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ,

ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, THE FRANCHIS E
(1) TO USE, FOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTIN G

ELECTRICITY SUITE D

FOR LIGHTING BUT FOR USE BY CONSUMERS FOR ANY

AND ALL LAWFUL PURPOSES OTHER THAN LIGHTING ,

ALL POLES, WIRES, CONDUITS AND APPURTENANCE S

WHICH ARE NOW OR MAY HEREAFTER BE LAWFULLY

PLACED AND MAINTAINED IN THE PUBLIC STREET S

AND PLACES WITHIN THE CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO ,

UNDER THAT CERTAIN FRANCHISE OF GRANTEE AC -
QUIRED PURSUANT TO SECTION 19 OF ARTICLE XI

OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,

AS SAID SECTION EXISTED PRIOR TO ITS AMENDMENT
ON OCTOBER 10, 1911 ; (2) TO CONSTRUCT, MAINTAIN

AND USE IN SAID PUBLIC STREETS AND PLACES AL L

POLES, WIRES, CONDUITS AND APPURTENANCES WHEN -

EVER AND WHEREVER SAID CONSTITUTIONAL FRANCHIS E

IS NOT NOW NOR SHALL HEREAFTER BE AVAILABL E

THEREFOR, NECESSARY TO TRANSMIT AND DISTRIBUT E

ELECTRICITY SUITED

FOR, AND FOR USE BY CONSUMERS FOR, ANY OR ALL
LAWFUL PURPOSES ; AND (3) TO UTILIZE SAID POLES , '

WIRES, CONDUITS AND APPURTENANCES IN SAID PUBLI C

STREETS AND PLACES FOR TRANSMITTING ELECTRICIT Y
_ FOR USE OUTSIDE THE

BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY FOR ANY AND ALL LAWFUL

PURPOSES, AND PROVIDING THE TERMS AND CONDITION S
OF THE FRANCHISE SO GRANTED .

BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of San Lui s
Obispo as follows :

AG :ktm 3/8/7 8
rev .6 7
rev . 4/78
O 767

SECTION 1 . DEFINITIONS .

Whenever in this ordinance the words and phrases herein - after in this section defined are used, they shall have th e respective meanings assigned to them in the following definitions :
(a) The word "grantee" shall mean Pacific Gas and Electri c Company, and its lawful successors or assigns ;
(b) The word "city" shall mean the City of San Lui s
Obispo, a municipal corporation of the State of California , in its present incorporated form or in any later reorganized , consolidated, enlarged or reincorporated form ;
(c) The word "streets" shall mean the public streets, ways , alleys and places as the same now or may hereafter exis t within city, including State highways, now or hereafte r established within city, and freeways hereafter establishe d within city ;
(d) The phrase "poles, wires, conduits and appurtenances " shall mean poles, towers, supports, wires, conductors, cables , guys, stubs, platforms, crossarms, braces, transformers , insulators, conduits, ducts, vaults, manholes, meters, cut - outs, switches, communication circuits, appliances, attachments, appurtenances and, without limitation to the foregoing , any other property located or to be located in, upon, along , across, under or over the streets of city, and used or usefu l in transmitting and/or distributing electricity .
(e) The phrase "construct, maintain and use" shall mea n to construct, erect, install, operate, maintain, use, repair , or replace ;
AG :ktm 3/8/78 -2 -
rev .6/5/78

(f) The phrase "constitutional franchise" shall mean th e right acquired through acceptance by grantee or its predecessor in estate of the offer contained in the provision s of Section 19 of Article XI of the Constitution of the
State of California, as said section existed prior to it s amendment on October 10, 1911 .

SECTION 2 . GRANT OF FRANCHISE .

The franchise (1) to use, for transmitting and distributing electricity suited for lighting but for
use by consumers for any and all lawful purposes other than lighting , all poles, wires, conduits and appurtenances which are now or ma y hereafter be lawfully placed and maintained in the streets withi n city under the constitutional franchise of grantee ; (2) to construct , maintain and use in said streets all poles, wires, conduits an d appurtenances whenever and wherever the constitutional franchis e of grantee is not now nor shall hereafter be available therefor , necessary to transmit and distribute electricity suited for, and fo r use by consumers for, any or all lawful purposes ; (3) to utiliz e said poles, wires, conduits and appurtenances in said publi c streets and places for transmitting electricity for use outside th e boundaries of city for any and all lawful purposes is hereb y granted to Pacific Gas and Electric Company, its successors an d assigns .

AG :ktm 3/8/78 -3 -
rev .6/5/7 8
rev .7/24/78 Page 153 of 253
SECTION 3 . RELOCATION OF FACILITIES .

Grantee of this franchise shall relocate, without expens e to city, any poles, wires, conduits and appurtenances theretofor e installed, and then maintained or used under this franchise, i f and when made necessary by any lawful change of grade, alignmen t or width of any streets by city, including the construction of an y subway or viaduct, or any other conflict with a municipal government purpose .

SECTION 4 . TERM .

Said franchise shall be indeterminate, that is to say , said franchise shall endure in full force and effect until th e same shall, with the consent of the Public Utilities Commissio n of the State of California, be voluntarily surrendered or abandoned by grantee, or until the state or some municipal or publi c corporation thereunto duly authorized by law shall purchase b y voluntary agreement or shall condemn and take under the powe r of eminent domain, all property actually used and useful in th e exercise of said franchise and situate in the territorial limit s of the state, municipal or public corporation purchasing or condemning such property, or until said franchise shall be forfeite d for noncompliance with its terms by grantee .

SECTION 5 . CONSIDERATION .

Grantee of said franchise shall during the term thereo f pay to city a sum annually which shall be equivalent to two percen t (2%) of the gross annual receipts of grantee arising from the use , operation or possession of said franchise ; provided, in case th e AG :ktm 6/5/78 -4-

State Legislature raises the minimum percentage allowable, th e new rate shall apply ; and provided, however, that such paymen t shall in no event be less than a sum which shall be equivalent t o one-half percent (1/2%) of the gross annual receipts derived by grantee from the sale of electricity within the limits of city unde r said franchise and said constitutional franchise .

In addition to the foregoing, grantee shall pay to cit y within thirty (30) days of the issuance by the Public Utilitie s Commission of a certificate of convenience and necessity t o exercise the franchise the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000 .00) .

If, at any time after the payment of said sum, it shall be adjudge d that said franchise did not become effective or was or is invalid , or if the grantee shall, at any time, be prevented by the city o r by judgment procured by any other person from exercising the same for any reason other than noncompliance with its terms by th e grantee, then said sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000 .00) shal l be forthwith repaid by the city to the grantee .

SECTION 6 . REPORTS .

Grantee shall file with the City Clerk within three (3 ) months after the expiration of the calendar year, or fractiona l calendar year, following the date of the granting hereof, an d within three (3) months after the expiration of each and every calendar year thereafter, a duly verified statement showing i n detail the total gross receipts of grantee during the precedin g calendar year, or such fractional calendar year, from the sal e of energy within city . Grantee shall pay to city within fiftee n (15) days after the time for filing such statement, in lawfu l AG :ktm 3/8/78 -5 -
rev . 6/5/78

money of the United States, the aforesaid percentage of its gros s receipts for such calendar year, or such fractional calendar year , covered by such statement . Any neglect, omission or refusal b y grantee to file such verified statement, or to pay said percentag e at the time and in the manner specified, shall be grounds for the declaration of a forfeiture of this franchise and of all right s of grantee hereunder .

SECTION 7 . AUTHORITY FOR GRANT .

This franchise is granted under the Indeterminat e
Franchise Act of 1937 and pursuant to Article XIII of the Charte r of the City of San Luis Obispo, adopted in 1955, and no othe r authority .

SECTION 8 . COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS .

All facilities or equipment of grantee that grantee shal l construct, maintain and use or remove, pursuant to the provisions of the franchise granted herein shall be accomplished in accordanc e with the ordinances, rules and regulations of city now or as here - after adopted or prescribed which are not in conflict with th e paramount authority of such rules, regulations and orders as ar e promulgated or approved by or are filed with the Public Utilitie s Commission or other governmental authority having jurisdiction i n the premises .

SECTION 9 . ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICES .

Grantee is herewith charged with the responsibility o f preparing, with the cooperation of city, a manual of administrativ e AG :ktm 6/5/78 -6-

practices which shall govern the installation and removal of grantee' s facilities in the streets of city which shall include, but not b e limited to, cathodic protection practices . Once each year, commencing with the first full calendar year of the franchise grante d herein, it is to be the joint responsibility of grantee and city to review and update such administrative practices . Both grantee and city are charged with the duty to review and update such administrative practices by a method of mutual cooperation which shal l take into consideration the reasonable needs and convenience o f each party ; provided that said administrative practices and th e terms and conditions thereof shall be at all times subject t o approval of the City Council as expressed by appropriate legislative action, and shall not conflict with the paramount authorit y of such rules, regulations and orders as are promulgated or approve d by or are filed with the Public Utilities Commission or other govern - mental authority having jurisdiction in the premises .

Following the preparation of said manual, and its approva l by the City Council, it shall govern the practices of the grante e in its installation and removal of grantee's facilities in th e streets of city .

SECTION 10 . CITY RESERVED POWERS .
(a) City reserves the right for itself to lay, construct , erect, install, use, operate, repair, replace, remove, relocate , regrade or maintain below surface or above surface improvement s of any type or description in, upon, along, across, under or ove r the streets of the city . City further reserves the right to re - locate, remove, vacate or replace the streets themselves . If the AG :ktm 6/5/78 -7-

necessary exercise of the aforementioned reserved rights is made necessary in order to accommodate a municipal government purpos e and conflicts with any poles, wires, conduits and appurtenance s of grantee constructed, maintained and used pursuant to the pro - visions of the franchise granted hereby, whether previously constructed, maintained and used or not, grantee shall, without cos t or expense to city after written notice from the City Administativ e Officer, or his designated representative, and request to do so , begin the physical field construction of changing the location o f all facilities or equipment so conflicting . Grantee shall procee d promptly to complete such required work .
(b) Irrespective of any other provision of this ordinance , grantee's right to construct, maintain and use, or remove poles , wires, conduits and appurtenances thereto shall be subject at al l times to the right of city, in the reasonable exercise of it s police power in response to a direct and immediate threat to th e health or safety of the public, to require the removal or relocatio n of said poles, wires, conduits and appurtenances thereto at th e sole cost and expense of grantee .

SECTION 11 . REPAIR COSTS .

Grantee shall pay to city on demand the cost of al l
repairs to city property made necessary by any of the operation s of grantee under the franchise granted hereby ; provided, however , that grantee may make repairs to streets, sidewalks, curbs an d gutters itself at its own cost in accordance with city specifications if the same can be done without undue inconvenience t o the public use of the streets .

AG :ktm 6/5/78 -8-

SECTION 12 . FORFEITURE .

This franchise is granted upon each and every conditio n herein contained, and shall be strictly construed against grantee .

Nothing shall pass by the franchise granted hereby to grante e unless it be granted in plain and unambiguous terms . Each o f said conditions is a material and essential condition to th e granting of the franchise . If grantee shall fail, neglect o r refuse to comply with any of the conditions of the franchis e granted hereby, and if such failure, neglect or refusal shal l continue for more than thirty (30) days after written deman d by the City Administrative Officer for compliance therewith, the n city, by the City Council, in addition to all rights and remedie s allowed by law, thereupon may terminate the right, privilege an d franchise granted in and by this ordinance, and all the rights , privileges and the franchise of grantee granted hereby shal l thereupon be at an end . Thereupon and immediately, grantee shal l surrender all rights and privileges in and to the franchise grante d hereby . No provision herein made for the purpose of securing th e enforcement of the terms and conditions of the franchise grante d hereby shall be deemed an exclusive remedy or to afford the exclusive procedure for the enforcement of said terms and conditions , but the remedies and procedure outlined herein or provided, includin g forfeiture, shall be deemed to be cumulative .

SECTION 13 . ACQUISITION AND VALUATION .

Nothing in this ordinance or in the franchise grante d
hereby shall be construed as in any way impairing city's right s AG :ktm 6/5/78 -9-

to acquire property of grantee through the exercise of city' s power of eminent domain, or through voluntary agreement betwee n city and grantee . In the event that city chooses to exercis e its power of eminent domain, it shall do so in accordance wit h the procedures provided by the general law of the State o f California for the condemnation of public utility property .

The valuation of such property for condemnation purposes shal l be made in accordance with such general law .

SECTION 14 . UNDERGROUNDING .
(a) It is the city's intent to underground all utilitie s as expeditiously as possible .
(b) Presently, grantee is engaged in a program of converting to underground certain of its facilities in accordanc e with Decision No . 73078 of the California Public Utilities Commission . At this time, said decision requires grantee to budge t prior to the end of each calendar year, certain sums of money fo r said program for the next succeeding year and allocate these sum s to undergrounding projects in the various governmental jurisdictions throughout grantee's entire service territory on th e basis of the number of customers in each governmental jurisdiction .

Grantee shall at all times use its best efforts to accomplish a s much conversion in the city as may be accomplished through the allocation or reallocation of funds by the California Publi c Utilities Commission pursuant to Rule 20 .

AG :ktm
rev . 7/24/78 -10-

(c) In addition to the foregoing, grantee agrees to permit city to install its conduits in grantee's trenches upon payment of city's proportionate share of trenching costs . Sai d conduits shall include, but not be limited to, conduits fo r street lighting, traffic signals and fire alarm systems .

SECTION 15 . HOLD HARMLESS .

Grantee of the franchise granted hereby shall indemnify , save and hold harmless, city and any officers and employees thereo f against and from all damages, judgments, decrees, costs and expenditures which city, or such officer or employee, may suffer, o r which may be recovered from, or obtainable against city, or suc h officer or employee, for, or by reason of, or growing out of o r proximately resulting from the exercising by grantee of any or al l of the rights or privileges granted hereby, or by reason of an y act or acts of grantee or its servants or agents in exercisin g the franchise granted hereby, and grantee shall defend any sui t that may be instituted against city, or any officer or employe e thereof, by reason of or growing out of or proximately resultin g from the exercise by grantee of any or all of the rights or privileges granted hereby, or by reason of any act or acts of grantee , or its servants or agents, in exercising the franchise grante d hereby .

SECTION 16 . EFFECTIVE DATE .

This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) day s after its final passage unless suspended by a referendum petitio n filed as provided by law .

AG :ktm 6/5/78 -11-

SECTION 17 . WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE .

The franchise granted hereby shall not become operative until written acceptance thereof shall have been filed by th e grantee with the City Clerk .

SECTION 18 . PUBLICATION AND PUBLICATION COSTS .

This ordinance, together with the ayes and noes, shal l be published once in full, at least three (3) days prior to it s final passage in the Telegram-Tribune, a newspaper publishe d and circulated in said city .

The grantee of said franchise shall pay to the city a
sum of money sufficient to reimburse it for all publicatio n expenses incurred by it in connection with the granting thereof ; such payment to be made within thirty (30) days after the cit y shall have furnished such grantee with a written statement o f such expense .

INTRODUCED AND PASSED TO PRINT by the Council of the Cit y of San Luis Obispo at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18t h day of July , 1978, on motion of Councilman Jorgensen, seconde d by Councilman Settle , and on the following roll call vote :

AYES : Councilmen Dunin, Jorgensen, Petterson, Settle & Mayor Schwart z NOES : None
ABSENT : Non e
ATTEST :

AG :ktm 3/8/7 8
rev .6/5/78
-12- Page 162 of 253
Approved as to form : Approved as to content :

WENDT, MITCHELL, SINSHEIMER ,
de la MOTTE & LILLE Y
City Attorney
By Allen Grimes
'C ;;Ir<31
City Administrate Office r
Director of Public Service s
AG :ktm 6/5/78 -13 -

ORDINANCE NO . 76 7
FINALLY PASSED this 1st day of August , 1978 ,
on motion of Councilman Settle seconded by
Councilman Jorgensen on the following roll call vote :

AYES : Councilmen Jorgensen, Petterson, Settle and Mayor Schwart z NOES : None
ABSENT : Councilman Duni n
ATTEST :

Item 6f
Department: Finance
Cost Center: Revenue
For Agenda of: 9/1/2026
Placement: Consent
Estimated Time: N/A
FROM: Emily Jackson, Finance Director
Prepared By: Debbie Malicoat, Deputy Finance Director
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR CONSULTING SERVICES TO

CONDUCT A CITYWIDE USER FEE STUDY AND PREPARE A CENTRAL

SERVICE COST ALLOCATION PLAN AND LABOR RATES

RECOMMENDATION
Authorize staff to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) for Consulting Services to Conduct a Citywide User Fee Study and Prepare a Central Service Cost Allocation Plan and Labor Rates, and delegate award authority to the City Manager.

POLICY CONTEXT
Section 2, “User Fee Cost Recovery Goals,” of the City’s adopted City Fiscal Policies identifies that a comprehensive analysis of City costs and fees should be made at least every three years. The City Council reviews its fiscal policies every two years to guide staff in development of the two-year Financial Plan. Council most recently adopted the User Fee Cost Recovery policy on June 17, 2025, with adoption of the FY 2025-27 Financial Plan. The Policy adopted in June 2025 reflected changes directed by Council with adoption of the prior user fee study on July 2, 2024. In advance of the upcoming user fee study, staff sought Council’s review of the Policy again on June 2, 2026, with adoption of the FY 2026-27 Budget Supplement; Council did not elect to make any changes to the Policy at that time.

Additionally, Strategic Approach 5.c within the Cultural Vitality, Economic Resilience and Fiscal Sustainability Major City Goal in the current financial plan includes direction to conduct an RFP process to identify a consultant to prepare the City’s annual cost allocation plan to ensure that enterprise funds are appropriately reimbursing the General Fund for services provided to them.

Further, while the Government Code does not explicitly mandate a specific schedule for updating fees, Sections 66016 and 66014 limit local agencies from collecting fees that exceed the reasonable costs of providing the services, implying that periodic review is necessary to ensure fees are not excessive.

DISCUSSION

Item 6f
Background
Many City services are considered a general public good and are funded through general tax revenues, however, some services are funded only by the users of the service. The City's User Fee Cost Recovery policy calls for the City to review and update service charges on an ongoing basis to ensure that they keep pace with changes in the cost-ofliving and changes in methods or levels of service delivery. State law generally provides that fees for services cannot exceed the reasonable actual costs for providing services.

In implementing this provision, the City has adopted the goal of comprehensively analyzing service costs at least every three years, with interim adjustments annually based on changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The last comprehensive fee study was approved by Council July 2, 2024 (R11507).

In addition, the City prepares an annual Cost Allocation Plan (CAP) to ensure that enterprise funds are appropriately reimbursing the General Fund for services provided.

The City’s current contract for this work has now expired and it is timely to issue an RFP for this service.

Given the timing of the triennial review of user fees and the expiration of the CAP consultant contract, issuing an RFP for both of these services in a consolidated fashion leverages the synergies between understanding what it costs to provide all services, whether to the community or to the enterprise funds, and then seeking appropriate cost recovery for those services. This approach is not uncommon in municipalities in California and staff anticipate consolidation will result in efficiencies compared to separating the activities.

Staff are requesting authority to issue the RFP for consultant services and delegating the authority to award the contract to the most responsive proposer to the City Manager.

Determining the most responsive proposer is based on a number of criteria such as prior experience doing similar work, proposed approach and timeline, references, interviews, and value for the City, not necessarily the lowest cost. All proposals will be evaluated by a cross-departmental team to determine the finalist. In order to bring fee study results to the Council in time for a July 2027 effective date of a new fee schedule, staff and consultant work efforts need to begin by October 1, 2026. Delegation of award authority to the City Manager will facilitate timely contract execution.

Previous Council or Advisory Body Action
Council has previously approved policies and provided direction to perform comprehensive fee studies every three years.

Public Engagement
As with the 2024 fee study, staff will engage Advisory Bodies, stakeholders and the public as to the outcome of the study. Notices of any changes to fees will be posted at public

Item 6f
counters, on the City’s website and to interested individuals that have requested such notices. Additionally, any changes would take place 60 days after the Council adopted a new fee schedule, which is anticipated to occur in May 2027.

Staff anticipates work to begin in October 2026 with preliminary calculations completed in January 2027. City Council review of study finding and draft recommendations is scheduled for the March 2, 2027 City Council meeting. Based on direction received, final recommendations will be presented for adoption at the May 4, 2027 City Council meeting.

This will allow time for communication with the community and updates to point of sale systems before the July 7, 2027 effective date. It will also meet the Government Code requirement of 60 days’ notice before new fees can take effect.

CONCURRENCE
Staff from all departments involved in the calculation or collection of user fees or preparation of the Cost Allocation Plan concur with the recommendation presented in this Council Agenda Report.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to the recommended action in this report because the action does not constitute a “project” under the CEQA guidelines section 15378.

FISCAL IMPACT
Budgeted: Yes Budget Year: 2026-27
Funding Identified: Yes
Fiscal Analysis:

Budget of $73,500 for this work effort was approved with the 2025-27 Financial Plan.

Budget for the annual CAP is reflected in the ongoing operating budget at $13,500 with one time funding for the triennial fee study of $60,000, approved as a Significant Operating Budget Change (SOBC) for FY 2026-27.

Funding
Sources
Total Budget
Available
Current
Funding
Request
Remaining
Balance
Annual
Ongoing
Cost
General Fund $73,500 $0 $73,500 $13,500
State
Federal
Fees
Other:

Total $73,500 $0 $73,500 $13,500

ALTERNATIVES

Item 6f
Council could direct staff to issue separate RFPs for a user fee study and preparation of a Cost Allocation Plan. Issuance of separate RFPs will reduce the synergies achieved by combining these work efforts.

Council could direct staff to delay issuing an RFP for this work scope and instead apply a CPI adjustment to fees. While the Government Code does not require specific timelines to update fees, delaying the fee study may result in the City’s fees not being in alignment with the actual costs of providing the services, which could result in the General Fund subsidizing the cost of services provided. In addition, the City’s contract with the current Cost Allocation Plan consultant is now expired.

ATTACHMENTS
A - RFP – User Fee Study and Cost Allocation Plan 2026

The City of San Luis Obispo is committed to including disabled persons in all of our services, programs and activities.

Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (805) 781-7410.

Notice Requesting Proposals for Consulting Services to Conduct a Citywide User Fee Study and Prepare a Central Service Cost Allocation Plan and Labor Rates The City of San Luis Obispo is requesting sealed proposals to conduct a Citywide User Fee Study, the annual central service cost allocation plan (CAP) and the development of annual labor rates for use in compiling reimbursement and grant application documents.

All firms interested in receiving further correspondence regarding this Request for Proposals (RFP) will be required to complete a free registration using BidNet Direct (www.bidnetdirect.com/).

All proposals must be received via BidNet Direct by September 11, 2026 at 3 p.m., when they will then be opened electronically via BidNet Direct on the proposal end date and time.

The preferred method for bid submission is electronic via BidNet Direct. However, if you wish to submit a paper copy, please submit it in a sealed envelope plainly marked “Proposal for Technology Consulting Services,” to the Department of Finance, at 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93401, at or before 3pm on September 11, 2026.

Project packages and additional information may be obtained at the City’s BidNet Direct website at www.BidNetDirect.com.

For technical help with BidNet Direct please contact BidNet Direct tech support at 800-835-4603.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................... 1 B. SCOPE OF WORK ....................................................................................................................................... 2 C. PROJECT SCHEDULE .................................................................................................................................. 5 D. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS........................................................................................................ 6 E. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS........................................................................................................... 8 F: PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL FORM................................................................................................................. 15 EXHIBIT A : FORM OF AGREEMENT............................................................................................................. 23

-1-
A. INTRODUCTION

1. Background Information – City of San Luis Obispo. The City of San Luis Obispo is located on California’s Central Coast, approximately halfway between Los Angeles and San Francisco. The City encompasses an area of 3,616 square miles, and has a population of about 47,000, not including the neighboring student population at California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly). It is a charter city and operates under the “Council-Mayor-City Manager” form of municipal government. The five-member City Council consists of the directly elected Mayor and four City Council members. San Luis Obispo is a full-service city, with police, fire, streets, engineering, parks, recreation, water and sewer services.

Additionally, residents in the neighboring cities of Pismo Beach, Grover Beach, Arroyo Grande, Morro Bay, Atascadero and Paso Robles (and other unincorporated areas) utilize San Luis Obispo’s recreational services. The City’s fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. Additional information about the City of San Luis Obispo can be found by visiting its website at http://www.slocity.org.

2. General Information – Request for Proposal. The City of San Luis Obispo is seeking proposals from qualified firms with expertise performing comprehensive user fee studies, cost allocation plans, and calculation of labor rates for local municipalities. Should any firm submitting a proposal consider subcontracting portions of the engagement, that fact must be clearly identified in the proposal along with the name of the proposed subcontracting firms. Following the reward of the contract, no additional subcontracting will be allowed without the express prior written consent of the City of San Luis Obispo.

3. General Information – User Fees. The City has established user fees for a variety of services. Section 2A of the City of San Luis Obispo’s Fiscal Policies asserts that fees will be reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure that the fee price satisfies the recovery policy as set by the City Council. A comprehensive analysis is conducted every three years to determine if any fees need to be adjusted beyond the annual inflator. The City is impacted by cost increases and inflationary pressures on labor, materials and supplies, and needs to ensure that existing fees are aligned with the cost of service and provide an opportunity for the City Council to re-align fee amounts with the adopted cost recovery policies.

The last fee study the City completed was in May 2024. In the interim, fees were adjusted by annual changes in the Consumer Price Index. Fees may be adjusted during this interim period based on supplemental analysis whenever there have been significant changes in the method, level or cost of service delivery. A copy of the most recently adopted Comprehensive Fee Schedule is available on the City’s website here.

General Information – Cost Allocation Plan and Labor Rates. Historically, the City’s central service cost allocation plan is prepared using actual costs from the most recently audited fiscal year, which causes a two-year time lag between the period and the year in which the costs are utilized in the current budget. This avoids any need for a periodic trueup process.

-2-
The Federal Transportation Administration (FTA) is the cognizant agency for the purpose of complying with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-87. The FTA has determined that the central service cost allocation plan does not require their review.

The City requires the preparation of two CAPs each fiscal year, one which is considered the full CAP and one which is used to apply overhead costs to federally funded grant programs and is prepared in compliance with OMB-A87.

The current consultant preparing the central service cost allocation plan is Mahoney and Associates and they have been invited to submit a proposal.

4. Project Lead. All questions and correspondence should be directed to Debbie Malicoat, Deputy Finance Director. The questions and the answers will then be forwarded to all firms that provide an email address and posted on the City’s website. All questions must be submitted no later than September 2, 2026. Responses will be provided by September 9, 2026.

Contact with personnel other than the name above regarding this RFP may be grounds for elimination from the selection process. The financial statements and previous Cost Allocation Plans of the City are available on the City’s website.

B. SCOPE OF WORK
The City is seeking a consultant to review and update existing user fees, as well as identify any new fees, as appropriate (noted as “Scope A – User Fees”). Water and Sewer (Wastewater) rates subject to California Proposition 218, and Parking and Transit rate-based fees are NOT included in the scope of work for this study.

In addition, the City is seeking a consultant to annually prepare central service cost allocation plans and labor rate calculations (noted as “Scope B – Cost Allocation Plan/Labor Rates”) for a period of three (3) years.

Ideally, the City would like the same Consultant to complete both Scope A and Scope B. However, it will also consider proposals for either Scope A or Scope B if a consultant has specific expertise in one and not the other. Please note that some of the tasks are overlapping in Scope A & Scope B and can be addressed accordingly.

1. Scope A – User Fees.
a. Establish a methodology for the evaluation of User Fees. Work and meet with City staff to refine the project scope, purpose, uses and goals of the City’s Fee Study to ensure that the study will be both accurate and appropriate to the City’s needs. Review project schedule and answer any questions pertaining to the successful development of the Study.

-3-
b. Conduct a comprehensive review of the City’s existing fees, rates, and charges, adopted cost recovery policies, and current technology utilized (i.e.

Energov/EPL). Meet with staff and conduct interviews as needed to gain an understanding of the City’s processes and operations.
c. Identify the total cost of providing each City service at a reasonable activity level and in a manner that is consistent with all applicable laws, statutes, rules and regulations governing the collection of fees, rates, and charges by public entities including, but not limited to Proposition 218 Costs should include appropriate and transparent General and Administrative overhead allocations to City activities and applicable overhead rates.
d. Compare service costs with existing cost recovery levels. This should include service areas where the City is currently charging for services as well as areas where the City perhaps should charge, in light of the City’s practices, or the practices of similar and/or neighboring cities.
e. Prepare a report that identifies each facility or service, its full cost, current and recommended cost recovery levels. The report should identify the direct cost, the indirect cost, and the overhead cost for each service; and provide a model for adjusting these fees and rates for the City’s current and future needs. f. Recommend appropriate fees and charges. Recommended fees are based on the analysis, together with the appropriate subsidy percentage for those fees where full cost recovery may be unrealistic or undesired, based on currently adopted City Council policies.
g. Prepare a report that identifies the current fees, and recommended fees. The report must also identify percentage change, cost recovery percentage, and fee comparison with other San Luis Obispo County cities or California cities that are comparable to San Luis Obispo. A survey comparison of rates and fees with similar cities will be used to help determine the appropriate level of subsidy, if any. h. Report on other matters that come to your attention in the course of your evaluation that in your professional opinion the City should consider. i. Prepare and deliver presentations to the City Council to facilitate understanding of the plan and its implications for the City and support communications and outreach; collect and document comments and concerns and provide necessary adjustments as requested.
j. Develop or modify the existing model for adjusting fees/rates; include the addition of potential service areas, future service enhancements, and the ability to calculate the estimated costs of providing the service under consideration.

-4-
k. Prepare a final comprehensive fee study report and provide an electronic copy (text searchable) of the plan that can be made available to City staff. This would include related schedules and cost documentation in a format that can be edited and updated by City staff to accommodate changes in the organization or changes in costs. Any Comprehensive fee schedule revisions developed shall also be made available to the City electronically, providing the ability to add or delete and/or update information as needed.
l. Develop a Project Budget for the Fee Study – a description of the project budget itemized according to individual tasks. Project budget should include:
i. A project schedule with activities, milestones, and deliverables. ii. Project budget defined, at minimum, as follows:

1. By task with a collective total by milestone and deliverable;

2. Labor rates for all project team members;

3. General overhead rates;

4. Costs for expenses such as printing, travel and attendance at meetings
iii. Proposed services to be referred to a subconsultant, anticipate subconsultants and anticipated costs for these services. m. Consult with the City staff should it become necessary to defend the City’s Fees as a result of any legal or other challenge. If the consultant/firm believes that additional tasks are warranted, they must be clearly identified in the proposal. As noted above, Water and Sewer rates subject to California Proposition 218, and Parking and Transit rate-based fees are NOT included in the scope of work for this study.

Scope B –Cost Allocation Plan/Labor Rates - The following steps are anticipated, but are not intended to be all inclusive or limiting:
a. Evaluate the City’s current allocation methodologies and bases. Meet with staff and conduct interviews as needed to gain an understanding of the City’s processes and operations.
b. Meet with all affected departments – both central service providers and those receiving cost allocations to determine the best cost allocation nexus. i. Conduct follow up as appropriate to finalize discussions and receive follow up material as required.
ii. Prepare any recommendations for changes in allocation methods based on best practices and professional experience.
iii. Incorporate the feedback obtained from the meetings referred to above into the preparation of the CAPs.
c. Develop a model for allocating costs in a manner that reflects the appropriate amounts of allocation based on the nexus between user departments and the central service cost activity and its costs.

-5-
d. Report on other matters that come to your attention in the course of your evaluation that in your professional opinion the City should consider. e. Present the findings to the City’s management group and make necessary adjustments as requested.
f. Calculate the costs for each position as appropriate using hourly rates and benefit costs provided by the Finance Department.
g. Where appropriate, utilize information from the CAPs to obtain additional indirect cost information.
h. Provide the labor rate information in an appropriate reporting format that is both comprehensive and easy to understand.
i. Develop a Project Budget for the CAPs/Labor Rates – a description of the project budget itemized according to individual tasks. Project budget should include:
i. A project schedule with activities, milestones, and deliverables. ii. Project budget defined, at minimum, as follows:

1. By task with a collective total by milestone and deliverable;

2. Labor rates for all project team members;

3. General overhead rates;

4. Costs for expenses such as printing, travel and attendance at meetings
iii. Proposed services to be referred to a subconsultant, anticipate subconsultants and anticipated costs for these services.

C. PROJECT SCHEDULE
Preliminary Schedule Tasks
October 1, 2026  Project kickoff
December 2026  Cost Allocation Plans/Labor Rates Complete January 2027  User Fee Study Complete
March 2, 2027  Review user fee study findings and draft recommendations with City Council
March 2027  Cost Allocation Plans/Labor Rates approved by City Council May 4, 2027  Final user fee study recommendations presented to City Council May – June  Update point of sale systems, community outreach and communication
July 7, 2027  New fee schedule takes effect

-6-
D. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

1. Requirement to Meet All Provisions. Each individual or firm submitting a proposal (bidder) shall meet all the terms, and conditions of the Request for Proposals (RFP) project package. By virtue of its proposal submittal, the bidder acknowledges agreement with and acceptance of all provisions of the RFP specifications.

2. Proposal Submittal. Each proposal must be submitted on the form(s) provided in the specifications and accompanied by any other required submittals or supplemental materials.

Proposal documents shall be submitted electronically via BidNet. However, if you can’t submit electronically, please email a copy to the contacts listed in the RFP package, if you can’t email it, please send a copy in a sealed envelope to the Department of Finance, City of San Luis Obispo, 990 Palm Street, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93401. To guard against premature opening, the proposal should be clearly labeled with the proposal title, project number, name of bidder, and date and time of proposal opening.

3. Insurance Certificate. Each proposal must include a certificate of insurance showing:
a. The insurance carrier and its A.M. Best rating.
b. Scope of coverage and limits.
c. Deductibles and self-insured retention.
d. The purpose of this submittal is to generally assess the adequacy of the bidder’s insurance coverage during proposal evaluation; as discussed under paragraph 12 below, endorsements are not required until contract award. The City’s insurance requirements are detailed in Exhibit C to the Agreement (Exhibit A to the RFP)

4. Proposal Quotes and Unit Price Extension. The extension of unit prices for the quantities indicated and the lump sum prices quoted by the bidder must be entered in figures in the spaces provided on the Proposal Submittal Form(s). Any lump sum bid shall be stated in figures. The Proposal Submittal Form(s) must be totally completed. If the unit price and the total amount stated by any bidder for any item are not in agreement, the unit price alone will be considered as representing the bidder’s intention and the proposal total will be corrected to conform to the specified unit price.

5. Proposal Withdrawal and Opening. A bidder may withdraw its proposal, without prejudice prior to the time specified for the proposal opening, by submitting a written request to the Director of Finance for its withdrawal, in which event the proposal will be returned to the bidder unopened.

No proposal received after the time specified or at any place other than that stated in the “Notice Inviting Bids/Requesting Proposals” will be considered. All proposals will be opened and declared publicly. Bidders or their representatives are invited to be present at the opening of the proposals.

6. Submittal of One Proposal Only. No individual or business entity of any kind shall be allowed to make or file, or to be interested as the primary submitter in more than one proposal, except an alternative proposal when specifically requested; however, an individual or business entity that

-7-
has submitted a sub-proposal to a bidder submitting a proposal, or who has quoted prices on materials to such bidder, is not thereby disqualified from submitting a sub-proposal or from quoting prices to other bidders submitting proposals.

7. Communications. All timely requests for information submitted in writing will receive a written response from the City. Telephone communications with City staff are not encouraged but will be permitted. However, any such oral communication shall not be binding on the City.

8. Proposal Retention and Award. The City reserves the right to retain all proposals for a period of 60 days for examination and comparison. The City also reserves the right to waive non-substantial irregularities in any proposal, to reject any or all proposals, to reject or delete one part of a proposal and accept the other, except to the extent that proposals are qualified by specific limitations. See the “special terms and conditions” in Section C of these specifications for proposal evaluation and contract award criteria.

9. Competency and Responsibility of Bidder. The City reserves full discretion to determine the competence and responsibility, professionally and/or financially, of bidders. Bidders will provide, in a timely manner, all information that the City deems necessary to make such a decision.

10. Contract Requirement. The bidder to whom award is made (Contractor) shall execute a written contract with the City within ten (10) calendar days after notice of the award. The contract shall be made in the form adopted by the City and incorporated in these specifications.

CONTRACT PERFORMANCE

11. The City’s contract terms and conditions that Consultant will be expected to execute and be bound by are attached hereto as Exhibit A.

-8-
E. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1. Contract Award. The contract will be awarded to the most qualified bidder that, in the City’s sole discretion in accordance with the Proposal Evaluation and Selection criteria set forth herein (if applicable), provides the best proposal.

2. Sales Tax Reimbursement.

For sales occurring within the City of San Luis Obispo, the City receives sales tax revenues.

Therefore, for bids from retail firms located in the City at the time of proposal closing for which sales tax is allocated to the City, 1% of the taxable amount of the bid will be deducted from the proposal by the City in calculating and determining the most qualified lowest cost bidder.

3. Labor Actions.

In the event that the successful proposer is experiencing a labor action at the time of contract award (or if its suppliers or subcontractors are experiencing such a labor action), the City reserves the right to declare said proposer is no longer the most qualified, responsive proposer and to accept the next acceptable proposal from a proposer that is not experiencing a labor action, and to declare it to be the most qualified, responsive proposer.

4. Failure to Accept Contract.

The following will occur if the proposer to whom the award is made (Contractor) fails to enter into the contract: the award will be annulled; any bid security will be forfeited in accordance with the special terms and conditions if a proposer's bond or security is required; and an award may be made to the next lowest responsible, responsive proposer who shall fulfill every stipulation as if it were the party to whom the first award was made.

5. Contract Term.

The supplies or services identified in this specification will be used by the City for three (3) years.

The prices quoted for these items must be valid for the entire period indicated above unless otherwise conditioned by the proposer in its proposal.

6. Contract Extension.

The term of the contract may be extended by mutual consent for an additional one-year, and annually thereafter, for a total of four years.

7. Supplemental Purchases
Supplemental purchases may be made from the successful proposer during the contract term in addition to the items listed in the Detail Proposal Submittal Form. For these supplemental purchases, the proposer shall not offer prices to the City in excess of the amounts offered to other similar customers for the same item. If the proposer is willing to offer the City a standard discount on all supplemental purchases from its generally prevailing or published price structure during the contract term, this offer and the amount of discount on a percentage basis should be provided with the proposal submittal.

8. Contractor Invoices.

The Contractor may deliver either a monthly invoice to the City with attached copies of detail

-9-
invoices as supporting detail, or in one lump-sum upon completion. 9 Non-Exclusive Contract. The City reserves the right to purchase the items listed in the Detail Proposal Submittal Form, as well as any supplemental items, from other vendors during the contract term.

10. Unrestrictive Brand Names. Any manufacturer's names, trade names, brand names or catalog numbers used in the specifications are for the purpose of describing and establishing general quality levels. Such references are not intended to be restrictive. Proposals will be considered for any brand that meets or exceeds the quality of the specifications given for any item. In the event an alternate brand name is proposed, supplemental documentation shall be provided demonstrating that the alternate brand name meets or exceeds the requirements specified herein. The burden of proof as to the suitability of any proposed alternatives is upon the proposer, and the City shall be the sole judge in making this determination.

11. Delivery. Prices quoted for all supplies or equipment to be provided under the terms and conditions of this RFP package shall include delivery charges, to be delivered F.O.B. San Luis Obispo by the successful proposer and received by the City within 90 days after authorization to proceed by the City.

12. Change in Work. The City reserves the right to change quantities of any item after contract award.

If the total quantity of any changed item varies by 25% or less, there shall be no change in the agreed upon unit price for that item. Unit pricing for any quantity changes per item in excess of 25% shall be subject to negotiation with the Contractor.

13. Submittal of References. Each proposer shall submit a statement of qualifications and references on the form provided in the RFP package.

14. Statement of Contract Disqualifications. Each proposer shall submit a statement regarding any past governmental agency bidding or contract disqualifications on the form provided in the RFP package.

-10-

1. Proposal Length:

Proposal length should only be as long as required to be responsive to the RFP, including attachments and supplemental materials, and no longer than 25 pages.

Submittal Requirements:

Proposal must contain the following, and in the following order:

1. Cover Letter (one page maximum):
a. The letter should provide a brief summary of the proposal, concisely describing the project, its goals, and the proposed plan of implementation. b. The letter should be addressed to Debbie Malicoat and signed by an official authorized to bind the firm and shall contain a statement that the proposal is valid for 90 days. c. The letter should provide the name, address, phone number and email address of your firm’s contact person for this Request for Proposal.

2. Technical Proposal:
a. Firm Overview: Provide a description of your firm, including the size (number of employees), number of years in business and areas of specialization. b. Description of Project Team Experience & Qualifications: Provide a general overview of the firm/consultant(s), and/or subconsultant(s) that will be assigned to the project.

Describe their experience in conducting similar engagements to the scope outlined in Section B, including recent projects of a similar nature. Include information regarding the resumes of consultant(s) that will be assigned and any other relevant information to demonstrate the firm’s experience with engagements of similar size and scope.

Specify who the Project Manager (lead person) will be for the project and describe projects of a similar nature in which they had “hands on” responsibility. The qualifications of each of the principal and senior consultants should be spelled out in this section (resumes for those individuals may be included in the Appendix). Those who are named must have a direct, hands-on role in the project. The City may insist on principal-level participation at every stage of the project, and any substitutions will require prior City approval.
c. Scope of Services, Work Plan and Schedule: Provide a description of the work program, including a description of deliverables and activities that will be undertaken.

Consultants should describe their approach for managing the project, schedule, and communicating with the City. Provide a schedule that includes resource (both City employees and vendor employees, if applicable) requirements, a step-by-step work plan of all activities involved in the conduct of the work, and timelines for those steps, identifying major steps and milestones.
d. Approach: Describe the firm/consultant’s technical approach used to gather and analyze data, expected interaction with City staff and estimated timeline for completing the scope of work. It should also list specific tasks necessary to fulfill the project requirements. Proposers are encouraged to amplify the scope of services and