SP20-0002_Staff Report_Attach D- EIR Appx H1-Greehouse-Gas-Report

Hallmark‐Barham Specific Plan EIR
Technical Appendices
Appendix H.1
Greenhouse Gas Report
Project: 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report

GREENHOUSE GAS ASSESSMENT

East Barham Residential Development Project
City of San Marcos, CA

Prepared for:

City of San Marcos
1 Civic Center Drive
San Marcos, CA 92069

Prepared By:

42428 Chisolm Trail
Murrieta, California 92562
760-473-1253

November 16, 2021

l.dn CorJlulllna. .Inc.
ii
Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................................. II LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................................... III LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................................................... III ATTACHMENTS ..................................................................................................................................................... III LIST OF COMMON ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................. IV

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 1

1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 PROJECT LOCATION ......................................................................................................................................... 2

1.3 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT............................................................................................................................... .. 2

2.0 BACKGROUND AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ........................................................................................... 6

2.1 UNDERSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE AND GREENHOUSE GASES ................................................................................ 6

2.2 CLIMATE AND METEOROLOGY ........................................................................................................................... 7

3.0 CLIMATE CHANGE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT .......................................................................................... 9

3.1 STATE ........................................................................................................................................................... 9

3.2 GHG THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE ................................................................................................................ 19

4.0 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................................................................... 21

4.1 CONSTRUCTION CO2E EMISSIONS CALCULATION METHODOLOGY........................................................................... 21

4.2 OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS CALCULATION METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 22

5.0 FINDINGS .................................................................................................................................................... 24

5.1 PROJECT RELATED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS.................................................................................................... 24

5.2 PROPOSED PROJECT OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ................................................................................................... 24

5.3 MU3 GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS ................................................................................ 26

5.4 MU3 GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT SCENARIO OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS .................................................................... 26

5.5 CEQA COMPLIANCE ...................................................................................................................................... 28

6.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................... 30

iii
Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report List of Figures

FIGURE 1-A: PROPOSED PROJECT SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ................................................................................. 3 FIGURE 1-B: MU3 GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT SCENARIO SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN .............................................. 4 FIGURE 1-C: PROJECT VICINITY MAP ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURE 2-A: EXISTING SITE LAYOUT ....................................................................................................................... 8

List of Tables

TABLE 4.1: EXPECTED CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ............................................................................................ 22 TABLE 4.2: SDG&E ENERGY INTENSITY FACTORS .................................................................................................. 23 TABLE 5.1: EXPECTED ANNUAL CONSTRUCTION CO2E EMISSIONS SUMMARY ..................................................... 24 TABLE 5.2: PROPOSED PROJECT OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS SUMMARY (MT/YEAR) ............................................ 25 TABLE 5.3: MU3 GENERAL PLAN ANNUAL CONSTRUCTION CO2E EMISSIONS SUMMARY ..................................... 26 TABLE 5.4: MU3 GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS SUMMARY (MT/YEAR) .......................... 27

Attachments

CALEEMOD EMISSION MODEL – PROPOSED PROJECT .......................................................................................... 33 CALEEMOD EMISSION MODEL – MU3 GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT SCENARIO ....................................................... 71 TEREX 4242SR ROCK CRUSHER EXAMPLE CUT SHEET ......................................................................................... 111 EMFAC – VMT PER TRIP CALCULATION .............................................................................................................. 121

iv
Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report

LIST OF COMMON ACRONYMS

Assembly Bill 32 (AB32)
Business as Usual (BAU)
California Air Pollution Control Officers Association’s (CAPCOA) California Air Resource Board (CARB)
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Carbon Dioxide (CO
2)
Cubic Yards (CY)
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Green House Gas (GHG)
International Residential Code (IRC)
Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)
Methane (CH
4)
Nitrous Oxide (N2O)
San Diego Air Basin (SDAB)
San Diego Air Pollution Control District (SDAPCD)
Senate Bill 97 (SB97)
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)

1 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project Description

The project proposes 151 multi-family residential units situated on approximately 10.56 gross acres. Residential buildings comprise approximately 2.8-acres of the project site. Multi-family residential dwelling units are comprised of one, two, and three-story condominiums with ten dwelling unit types interspersed throughout the Specific Plan area. Overall building heights will not exceed 40 feet. The project proposes a total of 349 parking spaces. This includes 283 garage spaces associated with the units, which will be pre-wired for electric vehicle charging stations. The project design includes 66 outdoor parking spaces of which 10 would be for the residences. The project would also include three electric vehicle charging stations within the visitor parking areas. The project would be designed without hearth options within any of the proposed multi-family units.

The project is proposing a General Plan Amendment (GP20-0002), Specific Plan (SP20-0002), Rezone (RZ20-0001), Multi-Fa mily Site Development Pl an (MFSD20-0001), Tentative Subdivision Map (TM20-0001), a Conditiona l Use Permit (CUP20-0007) and a Grading Variance (GV20-0002). The General Plan Land Us e designation for the site is Mixed Use 3 (MU3), which is a mixed-use non-residential designation with a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 1.50. A constructable concept plan for the existing site was prepared calling for the construction of three 3-story buildings consisti ng of 275,067 square feet (SF) of office use, 18,344 of retail use, and 879 parking spaces. Pa rking would be developed within a parking garage within each building. Th e total area including the parking would have a total gross floor area of 459,558 SF and would have a conservative FAR of 1.03.

Construction of the proposed project and the MU3 General Plan zoning designation (MU3 General Plan Buildout Scenario) would be expected to occur over a 16-month duration and are assumed to be the same. Grading for the project will consist of approximately 39,711 cubic yards (CY) of cut material and 86,052 CY of fill material requiring an import of approximately 46,341 CY of fill material. The MU3 scenario is anticipated to be the same.

During grading a rock crusher similar to a Terex 4242SR 310 horsepower (HP)+/- standalone would be onsite for ancillary crushing needs if necessary. The project also may require some blasting-related activities; as such, the project’s air quality study estimated the criteria air pollutants associated with blasting. Of relevance to this analysis, blasting-related activities would utilize ammonium nitrate with fuel oil (ANFO) based explosives. When ANFO detonates, the blast would produce both CO and NOx (EPA, 1995) neither of which are considered GHGs.

2 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report The proposed Project development plan as well as an existing site concept consistent with the MU3 General Plan Buildout Scenario is provided in Figures 1-A and 1-B respectively.

1.2 Project Location

The vacant 10.56 acre project site having an Assessor Parcel Number (APN) of 228-310-0100 is located at 943 E. Barham Drive in the Barh am/Discovery Community in the City of San Marcos. Specifically, the project site is located on the southern side of Barham Drive between Woodland Parkway and La Moree Road. A project vicinity map is shown in Figure 1-C.

1.3 Purpose of this Report

The purpose of this Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Assessment is to analyze the project’s GHG emissions and evaluate its conformance with the City of San Marcos’ Climate Action Plan (CAP). As described in the City’s CAP, there is an existing framework of federal, State, regional, and local policies and regulations that identify GHG reduction requirements within the State. The CAP provides a plan for the City to meet these requirements and achieve local reduction requirements outlined in the CAP. In addition, as identified in the CAP, showing consistency with the CAP would also demonstrate that the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact under the California Environmental Qua lity Act (CEQA) (City of San Marcos, 2020).

This analysis has been completed in order to compare Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions from both the proposed 151-unit multi-family resi dential development an d an allowable MU3 General Plan Buildout Scenario to construct three 3-story bu ildings consisting of 275,067 square feet (SF) of office use, 18,344 of retail use, and 879 parking spaces.

3 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report Figure 1-A: Proposed Project Site Development Plan

Source: (SB&O, INC., 2021)
\ \
\ \
\ \
'),. \
-,-_) \',
I I GRACE , ....

Cf.JURCH \''
\ \
·~ \ \_:.;-
. \ \
v\·
, \
\
~~o
' '
I Q ~ \
r
O oO ~ 0\ \ ~ A , \ I
J . . \ ------------- -------- L .• · <"'\o. OK \ MAP 12344 ,:J - - - - ~- 0 LOT178
\ ~ \
~ \

4 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report Figure 1-B: MU3 General Plan Buildout Scenario Site Development Plan

Source: (SB&O, INC., 2021)
GRAPHIC $CAL£
,oo ,oo 200 JOO
EXHIBIT2
NO. OF TOT Al GARAGE TOTAL RETAIL TOTAL OFFICE TOTAlFLOOR BLDG STORIES AREA(S.f.l AREA (S..F.I AREA(S..f. ) AREAjS..f.) I 3 2553 5 18344 87743 131622
,. 3 83172 0 41586 124758
3 3 7286'3 0 14 5738 218607
TOTAL 18 1576 18344 275067 474987
8WG 2 has ~~ $t one $ p;ut.1ng:: 160 spaces 1st story. 128 $pace s 2nd ~tory) , ...
... ....
"'
TOlllot

GROSS PROJECT
AREA (S.F.) FAR
4S9 558 1.034

PARKING PARKING

PROVIDED REQUIRED
879 880

5 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report Figure 1-C: Project Vicinity Map

Source: (Google, 2021)
Project
Location
casso\lJ?d
San Marcos
78 Craven Rd
n
0 cc :,
~
Q
a
~
Del Dios
ijj
Escondido
ijj
(lcho Pkw;, Via Ra
._
~ Qj

6 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report

2.0 BACKGROUND AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

2.1 Understanding Climate Change and Greenhouse Gases

Climate change refers to any significant change in measures of climate, such as temperature, precipitation, or wind patterns, lasting for an extended period of time (decades or longer).

The Earth’s temperature depends on the balance between energy entering and leaving the planet’s system. Many factors, both natural and human, can cause changes in the Earth’s energy balance, including variations in the sun's energy reaching Earth, changes in the reflectivity of Earth’s atmosphere and surface, and changes in the greenhouse effect, which affects the amount of heat retained by Earth’s atmosphere. The greenhouse effect is the trapping and build-up of heat in the atmosphere (troposphere) near the Earth’s surface. The greenhouse effect traps heat in the troposphere through a threefold process as follows:

Short-wave radiation emitted by the Sun is absorbed by the Earth, the Earth emits a portion of this energy in the form of long-wave radiation and GHGs in the upper atmosphere absorb this long-wave radiation and emit it into space and toward the Earth.

The greenhouse effect is a natural process that contributes to regulating the Earth’s temperature and creates a pleasant, livable environment on the Earth. Human activities that emit additional GHGs to the atmosphere increase the amount of infrared radiation that gets absorbed before escaping into space, thus enhancing the greenhouse effect and causing the Earth’s surface temperature to rise.

The GHGs typically analyzed in a greenhouse gas study are Carbon Dioxide (CO 2), Methane
(CH4), and Nitrous Oxide (N 2O) because they are emitted in the greatest quantities from human activities. A brief description of each GHG follows:

Carbon Dioxide. CO
2 is a naturally occurring gas and a by-product of human activities. It is the principal anthropogenic GHG that affects the Earth’s radiative balance. Natural sources of CO2 include, but are not limited to, respiration of bacteria, plants, animals, and fungi; volcanic out-gassing; and decomposition of dead organic matter. Human activities that generate CO2 are from the combustion of fuels such as coal, oil, natural gas, and wood and changes in land use.

Methane. CH
4 is produced through both natural and human activities. CH 4 is a flammable gas and is the main component of natural gas. CH 4 is produced through anaerobic (without oxygen) decomposition of waste in landfills , flooded rice fields, animal digestion, decomposition of animal wastes, production an d distribution of natu ral gas and petroleum, coal production, and incomplete fossil fuel combustion.

7 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report Nitrous Oxide. N2O is produced through natural and human activities, mainly through agricultural activities and natural biological processes, although fuel burning and other processes also create N 2O. Sources of N 2O include soil cultivatio n practices (microbial processes in soil and water), especially the use of commercial and organic fertilizers, manure management, industrial processes (such as in nitric acid production, nylon production, and fossil-fuel-fired power plants), vehicle emissions, and using N 2O as a propellant (such as in rockets, racecars, and aerosol sprays).

To simplify greenhouse gas calculations, both CH
4 and N 2O are converted to an equivalent
amount of carbon dioxide, or CO2e. CO2e is calculated by multiplying the calculated levels of CH4 and N2O by a Global Warming Potential (GWP). GWPs for both CH4 and N2 are presented within the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Clim ate Change (IPCC) report as being 25 and 298, respectively (IPCC, 2007).

2.2 Climate and Meteorology

Climate within the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB) area often varies dramatically over short geographical distances with cooler temperatures on the western coast gradually warming to the east as prevailing winds from the west heats up. Most of southern California is dominated by high-pressure systems for much of the year, which keeps San Diego mostly sunny and warm. Typically, during the winter months, the high-pressure system drops to the south and brings cooler, moister weather from the north. It is common for inversion layers to develop within high-pressure areas, which mostly define pressure patterns over the SDAB. These inversions are caused when a thin layer of the atmosphere increases in temperature with height. An inversion acts like a lid preventing vertical mixing of air through convective overturning. The City of San Marcos is within the SDAB so the same generalizations are true for the City.

Meteorological trends within the area generally show daytime highs ranging between 64ºF in the winter to approximately 88ºF in the summer with August usually being the hottest month.

Daytime Low temperatures range from approximately 37ºF in the winter to approximately 59ºF in the summer. Precipitation is genera lly about 16.2 inches per year (WRCC, 2021).

Prevailing wind patterns for the area vary during any given mo nth during the year and also vary depending on the time of day or night. The predominant pattern though throughout the year is usually from the west or westerly (WRCC, 2018). The existing site aerial map is shown in Figure 2-A.

8 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report Figure 2-A: Existing Site Layout

Source: (Google Earth Pro, 2021)
Project Site

9 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report

3.0 CLIMATE CHANGE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

3.1 State

State Greenhouse Gas Targets

Executive Order S-3-05

EO S-3-05 (June 2005) established the following statewide goals: GHG emissions should be reduced to 2000 levels by 2010, 1990 levels by 2020, and 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.

AB 32 and CARB’s Climate Change Scoping Plan

In furtherance of the goals established in EO S-3-05, the Legislature enacted Assembly Bill (AB) 32, the California Global Warming Solution s Act of 2006. AB 32 requires California to reduce its GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.

Under AB 32, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) is responsible for and is recognized as having the expertise to carry out and develop the programs and regulations necessary to achieve the GHG emissions reduction mandate of AB 32. Therefore, in furtherance of AB 32, CARB adopted regulations requiring the report ing and verification of GHG emissions from specified sources, such as indu strial facilities, fuel suppliers and electricity importers (see Health & Safety Code Section 35830; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 17, §§95100 et seq.). CARB is also required to adopt rules and regulations to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective GHG emission reductions. AB 32 authorized CARB to adopt market-based compliance mechanisms to meet the specified requirements. Finally, CARB is ultimately responsible for monitoring comp liance and enforcing any rule, regulation, order, emission limitation, emission reduction measure, or market-based compliance mechanism adopted.

In 2007, CARB approved a limit on the statewide GHG emissions level for year 2020 consistent with the determined 1990 baseline (427 million metric tons (MMT) CO 2E). CARB’s adoption of
this limit is in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 38550.

Further, in 2008, CARB adopted the Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change (2008 Scoping Plan) in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 38561. The 2008 Scoping Plan established an overall framework for the measures to be implemented to reduce California’s GHG emissions for variou s emission sources/sectors to 1990 levels by 2020. The 2008 Scoping Plan evaluated opportunities for sector-specific reductions,

10 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report integrated all CARB and Climate Action Team 1 early actions and additional GHG reduction features by both entities, identified additional measures to be pursued as regulations, and outlined the role of a cap-and-trade program.

In the
2008 Scoping Plan, CARB determined that achieving the 1990 emissions level in 2020 would require a reduction in GHG emissions of approximately 28.5 percent from the otherwise projected 2020 emissions level; i.e., those emissions that would occur in 2020, absent GHG- reducing laws and regulations (referred to as “Business-As-Usual” [BAU]). For purposes of calculating this percent reduction, CARB assumed that all new electricity generation would be supplied by natural gas plants, no further re gulatory action would impact vehicle fuel efficiency, and building energy efficiency codes would be held at 2005 standards.

In the 2011 Final Supplement to the
2008 Scoping Plan’s Functional Equivalent Document,
CARB revised its estimates of the projected 2020 emissions level in li ght of the economic recession and the availability of updated information about GHG reduction regulations. Based on the new economic data, CARB determined that achieving the 1990 emissions level by 2020 would require a reduction in GHG emissions of 21.7 percent (down from 28.5 percent) from the BAU conditions. When the 2020 emissions le vel projection was updated to account for newly implemented regulatory measures, including Pavley I (model years 2009–2016) and the Renewables Portfolio Standard (12 percen t to 20 percent), CARB determined that achieving the 1990 emissions level in 2020 would require a reduction in GHG emissions of 16 percent (down from 28.5 percent) from the BAU conditions.

In 2014, CARB adopted the
First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan: Building on the Framework (First Update). The stated purpose of the First Update was to “highlight California’s success to date in reducing its GHG emissions and lay the foundation for establishing a broad framework for continued emission reductions beyond 2020, on the path to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.” The First Update found that California was on track to meet the 2020 emissions reduction mandate established by AB 32, noted that California could reduce emissions further by 2030 to levels squarely in line with those needed to stay on track to reduce emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 if the state realizes the expected benefits of existing policy goals.

EO B-30-15

EO B-30-15 (April 2015) identified an interi m GHG reduction target in support of targets previously identified under S-3-05 and AB 32. EO B-30-15 set an interim goal of reducing

1 The Climate Action Team is comprised of state agency secretaries and heads of state agencies, boards and departments; these members work to coor dinate statewide efforts to implement GHG emissions reduction programs and adaptation programs.

11 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report statewide GHG emissions to 40 percent below 19 90 levels by 2030 to keep California on its trajectory toward meeting or exceeding the long-term goal of reducing statewide GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 as set forth in S-3-05. To facilitate achievement of this goal, EO B-30-15 calls for an update to CARB’s Scoping Plan to express
the 2030 target in terms of MMT CO 2e. The EO also calls for state agencies to continue to develop and implement GHG emission reduction programs in support of the reduction targets. Sector-specific agencies in transportation, energy, water, and forestry were required to prepare GHG reduction plans by September 2015, followed by a report on action taken in relation to these plans in June 2016.

SB 32 and AB 197

SB 32 and AB 197 (enacted in 2016) are compan ion bills that set a new statewide GHG reduction target; make changes to CARB’s membership and increase legislative oversight of CARB’s climate change-based activities; and expand dissemination of GHG and other air quality-related emissions data to enhance transparency and accountability. More specifically, SB 32 codified the 2030 emissions reduction goal of EO B-30-15 by requiring CARB to ensure that statewide GHG emissions are reduced to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. AB 197 established the Joint Legislative Committee on Climate Change Policies, consisting of at least three members of the Senate and three members of the Assembly, in order to provide ongoing oversight over implementation of the state’s climate policies. AB 197 also added two members of the Legislature to CARB as nonvoting member s. The legislation further requires CARB to make available and update (at least annually via its website) emissions data for GHGs, criteria air pollutants, and TACs from re porting facilities; and identify specific information for GHG emissions reduction measures when updating the scoping plan, including information regarding the range of projected GHG emissions and air pollution reductions that result from each measure and the cost-effectiveness (including avoided social costs) of each measure (see Health & Safety Code Section 38562.7).

2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan

In November 2017, CARB released
California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan for public review and comment (CARB, 2017). This update includes CARB’s strategy for achieving the state’s 2030 GHG target as established in Senate Bill (SB) 32 (discussed below). The strategy includes continuing the Cap-and-Trade Program through 2030,2 inclusive policies and broad support for clean technologies, enhanced industrial efficiency and competitiveness, prioritization of transportation sustainability , continued leadership on clean energy, putting

2 In July 2017, AB 398 was enacte d into law, thereby extending the le gislatively-authorized lifetime of the Cap-and-Trade Program to December 31, 2030.

12 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report waste resources to beneficial use, supporting resilient agricu ltural and rural economics and natural and working lands, securing California’s water supplies, and cleaning the air and public health. When discussing project-level GHG em issions reduction actions and thresholds, the 2017 Scoping Plan states “[a]chieving no net additional increase in GHG emissions, resulting in no contribution to GHG impacts, is an appropriate overall objective for new development.” However, the 2017 Scoping Plan also recognizes that such an achievement “may not be feasible or appropriate for every project … and the inability of a project to mitigate its GHG emissions to net zero does not imply the project results in a substantial contribution to the cumulatively significan t environmental impact of climate change under CEQA.” CARB’s Governing Board adopted the 2017 Scoping Plan in December 2017.

Building Energy

Title 24, Part 6

Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations was established in 1978 and serves to enhance and regulate California’s building standards. While not init ially promulgated to reduce GHG emissions, Part 6 of Title 24 specifically establishes Building Energy Efficiency Standards that are designed to ensure new buildings and altera tions or additions to existing buildings in California achieve energy efficiency and preserve outdoor and indoor environmental quality.

The California Energy Commission (CEC) is required by law to adopt standards every 3 years that are cost effective for homeowners over the 30-year lifespan of a building. These standards are updated to consider and incorporate new energy efficient technologies and construction methods. As a result, these standards save energy, increase electricity supply reliability, increase indoor comfort, avoid the need to constr uct new power plants, and help preserve the environment.

The 2016 Title 24 standards, which went into effect on January 1, 2017. When comparing the 2013 and 2016 standards for electrical consumption, it is expected that low ‐rise, single‐ family detached homes and multi-family homes would use 12 percent and 15 percent less electricity under the 2016 standards, respecti vely. Similarly, implementation of the 2016 standards is expected to reduce natural gas consumption by 21 percent in single-family homes and 31 percent in multi-family homes. Newly constructed non-residential buildings are estimated to achieve a 5 percent reductio n in electricity consumption under the 2016 standards and no significant change relative to natural gas consumption (California Energy Commission, 2015). The current version of CalEEMod used in this analysis employs, as a default parameter, the 2016 Title 24 standards to estimate GHG emissions.

The Project would be required, at a minimum, to comply with the latest version of Title 24 standards at the time the Project seeks building permits. At the time this report was

13 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report written, the 2019 standards were applicable and went into effect on January 1, 2020. The 2019 standards continue to improve upon the 2016 standards for residential and nonresidential buildings. One of the most notable changes in the 2019 standards is the requirement for the installation of rooftop sola r on residential buildings (California Energy Commission, 2017). It should be noted that the State updates these regulations every three years. Thus, throughout Project construction , buildings will need comply with the most recently adopted standards.

Title 24, Part 11

In addition to the CEC’s efforts, in 2008, the California Building Standards Commission adopted the nation’s first green building standards. The California Green Building Standards Code (Part 11 of Title 24) is commonly referred to as CALGreen and establishes minimum mandatory standards as well as voluntary standards pertaining to the planning and design of sustainable site development, energy efficiency (in excess of the California Energy Code requirements), water conservation, material conservation, and interior air quality. The CALGreen standards initially took effect in January 2011 and instituted mandatory minimum environmental performance standards for all ground-up, new construction of commercial, low-rise residential and state-owned building s and schools and hospitals. The CALGreen 2016 standards became effective on January 1, 2017. The mandatory standards require the following (24 CCR Part 11):

• Mandatory reduction in indoor water use through compliance with specified flow rates for plumbing fixtures and fittings
• Mandatory reduction in outdoor water use through compliance with a local water efficient landscaping ordinance or the California Depa rtment of Water Resources’ Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
• Sixty-five (65) percent of construction and demolition waste must be diverted from landfills • Mandatory inspections of energy systems to ensure optimal working efficiency • Inclusion of EV charging stations or designated spaces capable of supporting future charging stations
• Low-pollutant emitting exterior and interior finish materials, such as paints, carpets, vinyl flooring, and particle boards

The CALGreen standards also include voluntary efficiency measures that are provided at two separate tiers and implemented at the discretion of local agencies and applicants. CALGreen’s Tier 1 standards call for a 15 percent improvement in energy requirements; stricter water conservation, 10 percent recycled content in building materials, 20 percent permeable paving, 20 percent cement reduction, and cool/solar-reflective roofs. CALGreen’s more rigorous Tier 2 standards call for a 30 percent improvement in energy requirements, stricter water conservation, 75 percent diversion of construction and demolition waste, 15 percent recycled

14 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report content in building materials, 30 percent perm eable paving, 25 percent cement reduction, and cool/solar-reflective roofs.

The CALGreen standards were again updated in 2019 which includes mandatory measures for planning and design, energy efficiency, wa ter and conservation efficiency, material and resource conservation as well as Environmental Quality. A thorough checklist is provided by California’s Housing and Community Developm ent Department (Housing and Community Development, 2019). The project would be required to utilize th e latest CalGreen standards (International Code Council, 2019).

Title 20

Title 20 of the California Code of Regulations requires manufacturers of appliances to meet state and federal standards for energy and water efficiency. Performance of appliances must be certified through the CEC to demonstrate compliance with standards. New appliances regulated under Title 20 include: refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers and freezers; room air conditioners and room air-conditioning heat pumps; central air conditioners; spot air conditioners; vented gas space heaters; gas po ol heaters; plumbing fittings and plumbing fixtures; fluorescent lamp ballasts; lamps; emergency lighting; traffic signal modules; dishwaters; clothes washers and dryers; cooking products; electric motors; low voltage dry- type distribution transformers; power supplie s; televisions and consumer audio and video equipment; and battery charger systems. Title 20 presents protocols for testing for each type of appliance covered under the regulations and appliances must meet the standards for energy performance, energy design, water performance and water design. Title 20 contains three types of standards for appliances: federa l and state standards for federally regulated appliances, state standards for federally regu lated appliances, and state standards for non- federally regulated appliances.

Mobile Sources

AB 1493

In response to the transportation sector accounting for more than half of California’s CO 2 emissions, AB 1493 was enacted in July 2002. AB 1493 required CARB to set GHG emission standards for passenger vehicles, light-duty truc ks, and other vehicles determined by CARB to be vehicles that are primarily used for noncommercial personal transportation in the state.

The bill required that CARB set GHG emission standards for motor vehicles manufactured in 2009 and all subsequent model years. CARB adopted the standards in September 2004. When fully phased in, the near-term (2009–2012) standards will result in a reduction of about 22

15 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report percent in GHG emissions compared to the emissions from the 2002 fleet, while the mid-term (2013–2016) standards will result in a reduction of about 30 percent (CARB, 2017).

EO S-1-07

Issued in January 2007, EO S-1-07 sets a de clining Low Carbon Fuel Standard for GHG emissions measured in CO 2e grams per unit of fuel energy sold in California. The carbon intensity measures the amount of GHG emissi ons in the lifecycle of a fuel, including extraction/feedstock production, processing, transportation, and final consumption, per unit of energy delivered. CARB ad opted the implementing regula tion in April 2009 and began implementation in 2011. The LCFS is designed to encourage the use of cleaner low-carbon transportation fuels in California, encourage the production of those fuels, and therefore, reduce GHG emissions and decrease petroleum dependence in the transportation sector.

The latest amendment to LCFS implementation regulations was in 2018 and CARB approved amendments which included strengthening and smoothing the carbon intensity benchmarks through 2030 in-line with California's 2030 GHG emission reduction target enacted through SB 32 (CARB, 2018).

SB 375

SB 375 (2008) addresses GHG emissions associated with the transportation sector through regional transportation and sustainability plans. SB 375 required CARB to adopt regional GHG reduction targets for the automobile and lig ht-truck sector for 2020 and 2035. Regional metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) are then responsible for preparing a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) within their Regional Transportation Plan. The goal of the SCS is to establish a forecasted development pattern for the region that, after considering transportation measures and policies, will achi eve, if feasible and if implemented, the GHG reduction targets. If a SCS is unable to achi eve the GHG reduction target, an MPO must prepare an Alternative Planning Strategy demonstrating how the GHG reduction target would be achieved through alternative development patterns, infrastructure, or additional transportation measures or policies.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 65080(b)(2)(K), a SCS does not: (i) regulate the use of land; (ii) supersede the land use authority of cities and counties; or (iii) require that a cities or counties land use policies and regulations, including those in a general plan, be consistent with it. Nonetheless, SB 375 makes regional and local planning agencies responsible for developing those strategies as part of the federally required metropolitan transportation planning process and the state-mandated housing element process.

16 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report In 2010, CARB adopted the SB 375 targets for the regional metropolitan planning organizations. The targets for SANDAG adopted in 2010 are a 7 percent reduction in emissions per capita by 2020 and a 13 percent reduction by 2035; the targets are expressed as a percent change in per capita passenger vehicle GHG emissions relative to 2005.

In October 2015, SANDAG adopted
San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan , which contains
the region’s current SCS. In December 2015, CARB, by resolution, accepted SANDAG’s GHG emissions quantification analysis and dete rmination that, if implemented, the SCS would achieve CARB’s 2020 and 2035 GHG emissions re duction targets for the region. More specifically, as set forth in CARB Executive Order G-15-075, CARB determined that SANDAG’s SCS would achieve a 15 percent per capita re duction by 2020 and a 21 percent per capita reduction by 2035.

In 2018, CARB updated the SB 375 targets. Fo r purposes of SANDAG , the updated targets include a 15 percent reduction in emissions per capita by 2020 and a 19 percent reduction by 2035 (CARB, 2018). SANDAG is in the process of preparing its next SCS, which will consider whether and how the region could attain these reduction targets.

Currently SANDAG is working on the 2021 Region al Plan. The current Draft Plan provides a big picture vision for how the San Diego regi on will grow through 2050 and beyond with an implementation program to help make the plan a reality. Within the Draft Plan, SANDAG introduced a transformative vision for transportation in San Diego County that completely reimagines how people and goods could move throughout the region in the 21st century. The plan outlines the “5 Big Moves” which are: Complete Corridors, Transit Leap, Mobility Hubs, Flexible Fleets, and the Next OS. The SANDAG Board of Directors will be asked to adopt the 2021 Regional Plan in late 2021. Once adopted, it will become the region’s long-term plan to be implemented incrementally through the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) (SANDAG, 2021).

Advanced Clean Cars Program

In January 2012, CARB approved the Advanced Clean Cars program, a new emissions-control program for model years 2015 through 2025. The program combines the control of smog- and soot-causing pollutants and GHG emission s into a single coordinated package. The package includes elements to reduce smog-forming pollution, reduce GHG emissions, promote clean cars, and provide the fuels for clean cars (CARB, 2017). To improve air quality, CARB also has implemented new emission standards to reduce smog-forming emissions beginning with 2015 model year vehicles. It is estimated that, in 2025, cars will emit 75 percent less smog-forming pollution than the average new car sold today. To reduce GHG emissions, CARB, in conjunction with the EPA and the NHTSA, also has adopted new GHG standards for

17 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report model year 2017 to 2025 vehicles; the new standards are estimated to reduce GHG emissions by 34 percent in 2025 (California Air Resources Board, 2012).

EO B-16-12

EO B-16-12 (March 2012) directs state entities under the Governor’s direction and control to support and facilitate developmen t and distribution of ZEVs. Th is EO also sets a long-term target of reaching 1.5 million zero-emission vehicles on California’s roadways by 2025. On a statewide basis, EO B-16-12 also establishe s a GHG emissions reduction target from the transportation sector equaling 80 percent less than 1990 levels by 2050. In furtherance of this EO, the Governor convened an Interage ncy Working Group on Zero-Emission Vehicles that has published multiple reports regarding the progress made on the penetration of ZEVs in the statewide vehicle fleet.

SB 350

In 2015, SB 350 – the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act – was enacted into law. As one of its elements, SB 350 establishes a statewide policy for widespread electrification of the transportation sector, recognizing that such electrification is required for achievement of the state’s 2030 and 2050 reduction targets (see Public Utilities Code Section 740.12).

Renewable Energy Procurement

SB 1078

SB 1078 (2002) established the Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) program, which requires an annual increase in renewable generation by the utilities equivalent to at least 1 percent of sales, with an aggregate goal of 20 percent by 2017. This goal was subsequently accelerated, requiring utilities to obtain 20 percent of their power from renewable sources by 2010.

SB X1 2

SB X1 2 (2011) expanded the RPS by establishing that 20 percent of the total electricity sold to retail customers in California per year by December 31, 2013, and 33 percent by December 31, 2020, and in subsequent years be secured from qualifying renewable energy sources. Under the bill, a renewable electrical generation facility is one that uses biomass, solar thermal, photovoltaic, wind, geothermal , fuel cells using renewable fuels, small hydroelectric generation of 30 megawatts or less, digester gas, municipal solid waste conversion, landfill gas, ocean wave, ocean thermal, or tidal current, and that meets other

18 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report specified requirements with respect to its location. In addition to the retail sellers previously covered by the RPS, SB X1 2 added local, pub licly owned electric utilities to the RPS.

SB 350

SB 350 (2015) further expanded the RPS by establishing that 50 percent of the total electricity sold to retail customers in California per year by December 31, 2030 be secured from qualifying renewable energy sources. In addition, SB 350 includes the goal to double the energy efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas final end uses (such as heating, cooling, lighting, or class of energy uses on which an energy-efficiency program is focused) of retail customers through energy conservation and efficiency.

SB 100

SB 100 (2018) has further accelerated and expanded the RPS, requiring achievement of a 50 percent RPS by December 31, 2026 and a 60 pe rcent RPS by December 31, 2030. SB 100 also established a new statewide policy goal that calls for eligible renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources to supply 100 percent of electricity retail sales within the State of California by December 31, 2045.

Water

EO B-29-15

In response to drought-related concerns, EO B-29-15 (April 2015) set a goal of achieving a statewide reduction in potable urban water usage of 25 percent relative to water use in 2013.

The term of the EO extended through February 28, 2016, although many of the directives have since become permanent water-efficiency standards and requirements. The EO includes specific directives that set strict limits on water usage in the state. In response to EO B-29- 15, the California Department of Water Resources has modified and adopted a revised version of the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordina nce that, among other changes, significantly increases the requirements for landscape water use efficiency and broadens its applicability to include new development projects with smaller landscape areas.

Solid Waste

AB 939 and AB 341

AB 939 (1989), known as the Integrated Waste Management Act (Pub lic Resources Code Sections 40000 et seq.), was passed because of the increase in waste stream and the

19 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report decrease in landfill capacity. The statute established the California Integrated Waste Management Board, which oversees a dispos al reporting system . AB 939 mandated a reduction of waste being disposed where jurisdictions were required to meet diversion goals of all solid waste through source reduction, recycling, and composting activities of 25 percent by 1995 and 50 percent by the year 2000.

AB 341 (2011) amended the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 to include a provision declaring that it is the policy goal of the state that not less than 75 percent of solid waste generated be sour ce-reduced, recycled, or comp osted by the year 2020, and annually thereafter. In addition, AB 341 requir ed the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to develop strategies to achieve the state’s policy goal.

CalRecycle has conducted multiple workshops and published documents that identify priority strategies that CalRecycle believes would assist the state in reaching the 75 percent goal by 2020.

Increasing the amount of commercial solid waste that is recycled, reused, or composted will reduce GHG emissions primarily by 1) reducing the energy requirements associated with the extraction, harvest, and processing of raw ma terials and 2) using recyclable materials that require less energy than raw materials to ma nufacture finished products (CalRecycle, 2020) Increased diversion of organic materials (gr e e n a n d f o o d w a s t e ) w i l l a l s o r e d u c e G H G emissions (CO
2 and CH4) resulting from decomposition in landfills by redirecting this material to processes that use the solid waste material to produce vehicle fuels, heat, electricity, or compost.

3.2 GHG Thresholds of Significance

The City of San Marcos (City) adopted an updated Climate Action Plan (CAP) on December 8, 2020. The CAP outlines strategies and measures that the City will undertake to achieve its proportional share of State greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction targets. The CAP is a plan for the reduction of GHG emissions in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183.5. Pursua nt to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15064(h)(3), 15130(d), and 15183(b), a project’s incremental contribution to a cumulative GHG emissions effect may be determined not to be cumulatively considerable if it is consistent with the City’s CAP. The CAP set the following citywide targets (City of San Marcos, 2020).

• 4 percent below 2012 levels (575,000 MTCO2e) by 2020, • 42 percent below 2012 levels (347,000 MTCO2e) by 2030

The City has also developed a Climate Action Plan Consistency Review Checklist (CAP Consistency Checklist), in conjunction with the CAP, to provide a streamlined review process for proposed new development projects that ar e subject to discretionary review and trigger

20 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report environmental review pursuant to CEQA. The CAP Consistency Guidance Memo dated July 15, 2020 summarizes the methodology and application of a GHG screening threshold which is set at 500 metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent [MTCO2e] per year as outlined int the CAP (Ascent, 2020). Projects that are proj ected to emit fewer than 500 MTCO 2e annually would not make a considerable contribution to the cumulative impact of climate change and would not need to provide additional analysis to demonstrate consistency with the CAP. It should be noted that this screening threshold is for new development projects consistent with the City’s General Plan. When such a project exceeds the screening threshold, the project would be required to demonstrate consistency with the CAP through the CAP Consistency Checklist.

In most cases, compliance with the Checklist would provide the CEQA streamlining path to allow project specific environmental documents, if eligible, to tier from and/or incorporate by reference the CAP’s programmatic review of GHG impacts. Projects that are consistent with the General Plan and implement CAP GHG reduction measures may incorporate by reference the CAP’s cumulative GHG analysis. The City’s CAP meets the requirements under Section 15183.5 of the CEQA Guidelines as a qualified plan for the reduction of GHG emissions for use in cumulative impact analysis pertaining to development projects. The Checklist provides a streamlined review process for the GHG emissions analysis of proposed new development projects that are subject to discretionary review and trigger environmental review pursuant to CEQA.

If a project is consistent with the existing Ge neral Plan land use designation(s), it can be determined to be consistent with the CAP projections and can move forward to Step 2 of the Checklist.

In addition, some projects may seek a General Plan amendment. For these projects, the Checklist requires a determination on whether the amendment would result in an equivalent or less GHG-intensive project when compared to the existing designations. In addition to providing evidence to support the conclusion that the project would generate fewer emissions than existing designations, these projects would demonstrate consistency with the CAP through completion of Step 2 of the Checklist.

If a land use designation amendment results in a more GHG-intensive project, the project is required to prepare a quantitative GHG analysis based on applicable sections of the CEQA Guidelines.

21 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report

4.0 METHODOLOGY

4.1 Construction CO 2e Emissions Calculation Methodology

GHGs related to construction and daily operations were calculated using the latest CalEEMod 2020.4.0 GHG model. The purpose of this analys is is to complete a comparison with the proposed Project and the MU3 General Plan Buildout scenario. The construction module in CalEEMod is used to calculate the emissions associated with the construction of the project.

The CalEEMod input/output model is shown in
Attachment A for the Proposed Project and
Attachment B for the MU3 General Plan Buildout scenario.

The project would start grading late 2022 with residential constructi on to start shortly thereafter. Grading will consist of approximately 39,711 cubic yards (CY) of cut material and 86,052 CY of fill material requiring an import of approximately 46,341 CY of fill material.

Earthwork associated with grading within Ca lEEMod uses a “Grading Equipment Passes” methodology which has been approved by SCAQM D. As noted in CalEEMod documentation, this methodology was approved by CAPCOA (CAPCOA, 2021). Since CalEEMod was used for GHG estimation from construction, this methodology was assumed.

Per the Project Engineer, during grading operat ions, a standalone rock crusher similar to a Terex 4242SR 310 horsepower (HP)+/- would be onsite for ancillary crushing needs if necessary. An example of the crusher modeled within CalEEMod is shown in Attachment C
to this report. Construction of all residential units would be expected sometime in 2024. As previously discussed, the project’s blasting-related activities would not generate GHG emissions. Table 4.1 describes the construction equipment and durations.

22 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report Table 4.1: Expected Construction Equipment
Equipment Identification Proposed Start Proposed Completion Quantity Work Days Site Preparation 12/1/2022 12/14/2022 10
Graders 3
Rubber Tired Dozers 4
Haul Trucks 12/1/2022 12/14/2022 8
Rock Drilling 12/15/2022 12/21/2022 5
Bore/Drill Rigs 1
Grading 12/15/2022 1/25/2023 30
Crushing/Proc. Equipment 1
Excavators 2
Graders 1
Rubber Tired Dozers 1
Scrapers 2
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2
Haul Trucks 12/15/2022 1/25/2023 8
Building Construction 01/26/2023 03/20/2024 300
Cranes 1
Forklifts 3
Generator Sets 1
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3
Welders 1
Paving 03/21/2024 04/17/2024 20
Pavers 2
Paving Equipment 2
Rollers 2
Architectural Coating 2/15/2024 4/17/2024 45
Air Compressors 1
This equipment list is based upon equipment inventory within CALEEMOD 2020.4.0.

4.2 Operational Emissions Calculation Methodology

Once construction is complete, the proposed project would generate GHG emissions from daily operations which would include source s such as Area (or onsite emissions like landscaping), Energy usage from electricity an d natural gas, mobile sources from vehicular traffic, municipal waste and from water uses , which are calculated within CalEEMod. For consistency with the CAP, the project was anal yzed under the 2030 year scenario. Also, no hearth options were included within the modeling.

Solid municipal waste generated in the form of trash is also considered within this analysis as the decomposition of organic material breaks down to form GHGs. GHGs from water are also

23 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report indirectly generated through the conveyance of the resource via pumping throughout the state and as necessary for wastewater treatment.

It should be noted that electrical energy-intensity factors were updated in CalEEMod 2020.4.0 to reflect San Diego Gas and Electric’s (SDG&E) latest emissions rates which SDG&E provided to CAPCOA for the model update. CalEEMod 2016.3.2 (the model prior to 2020.4.0) was based on default emissions from 2009 which included a 10.5% RPS factor as indicated by California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) (CPUC, 2016). The default CalEEMod 2020.4.0 emissions are now 540 pounds per megawatt hour (lb/MWh) which when compared with the defaults in 2016.3.2 represents a 33% achievement for RPS in 2020 which is consistent with SBX1-2.

In accordance with SB 100, SDG&E will achieve an RPS of 60% in 2030. Table 4.2 identifies what the emissions in 2030 will be assuming a 60% RPS is achieved as required.

Table 4.2: SDG&E Energy Intensity Factors
GHG
2009 Factors
(lbs/MWh) w/10.5%
RPS
Current RPS Factors
2020 33% Achieved
(lbs/MWh)
Current RPS Factors
2030 60% Achieved
(lbs/MWh)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 720.49 539.98 322.38
Methane (CH4) 0.029 0.033 0.0197
Nitrous Oxide (N2O) 0.006 0.004 0.0024

The Project traffic engineer estimated that the project would generate 1,208 daily trips (LLG Engineers, 2021). These traffic numbers were ut ilized within the CalEEMod analysis as the model. In addition, the project traffic study estimated that the MU3 General Plan Buildout scenario would generate 5,410 ADT (LLG Engineers, 2021). This analysis uses a 5.4 mile trip distance which is consistent with the pr oject’s air quality assessment which uses methodologies looking at EMFAC total VMT divided by the total number of trips within the County of San Diego (LDN Consul ting, 2021). It should be noted that the Air Quality report used a 2025 scenario and the VMT per trip may be slightly different in 2030. Since the project comparison would utilize the same year regard less, any changes in VMT per trip would be inconsequential. The EMFAC mode ling results are provided as Attachment D . The trip
distance is used for an illustrative comparative analysis for the project and is not intended to set a precedent for trip distances for projects in the City of San Marcos. Individual project analyses will continue to be assessed based on project-specific conditions and substantiated trip distances.

Additionally, it was assumed that an average of 10% of the structural surface area will be re- painted each year. The operat ional modeling results for the proposed development and the MU3 General Plan Buildout scenario can also be seen in
Attachments A and -B respectively.

24 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report

5.0 FINDINGS

5.1 Project Related Construction Emissions

Utilizing the CALEEMOD 2020.4.0 construction inpu ts as shown in Table 4.1, we find that construction of the project will pr oduce approximately 881.55 MT of CO 2e over the construction life of the project. Given the fact that the total emissions would ultimately contribute to cumulative levels, construction emissions of GHGs were annualized to allow for inclusion in operational emissions estimates, consistent with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) recommendations for construction GHG emissions (SCAQMD, 2008). Construction emissions were annualiz ed over a 30-year period, per SCAQMD recommendations, to account for emissions generated over the assumed project lifetime.

Given this, the Project would add approximately 29.38 MT CO 2e per year from construction which were added to annual operational emissions estimates. A summary of the construction emissions is shown in Table 5.1.

Table 5.1: Expected Annual Construction CO
2e Emissions Summary
Year Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
(MT)
2022 0.00 164.80 164.80 0.02 0.02 170.08
2023 0.00 570.74 570.74 0.09 0.02 579.61
2024 0.00 130.56 130.56 0.02 0.00 131.86
Total Construction Emissions 881.55
Yearly Average Construction Emissions (Metric Tons/year over 30 years) 29.38 Expected Construction emissions are based upon CalEEMod modeling assumptions for equipment and durations listed in Table 4.1.

5.2 Proposed Project Operational Emissions

Once construction is completed the proposed project would generate GHG emissions from daily operations which would include sources su ch as area, energy, mobile, solid waste and water uses, which are calculated within CalEEMod. Area Sources include consumer products, landscaping and architectural coatings as part of regular maintenance. Energy sources would be from electricity usage and natural gas. Solid waste generated in the form of trash is also considered as decomposition of organic material breaks down to form GHGs. Water sources include standard residential uses including landscaping activities.

This analysis is driven by the CAP and since this Project seeks a General Plan Amendment, the proposed Project is analyzed in comparison with existing designations to determine if it

25 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report would be less intense than what would otherwise be approved under the existing General Plan. If a project’s proposed amendment to the General Plan results is lower GHG emissions than development under the General Plan, the project would be required to implement the applicable CAP Measures identified in Step 2 of the CAP Consistency Review Checklist. Based on this, quantifiable measures such as EV Chargers are provided.

The proposed project has 66 parking spaces and would include 3 Electric Vehicle Charging Stations. The project has been designed to meet the requirements of Measure T-2. The City’s CAP estimated that in the year 2030, 363 MT CO
2e will be reduced from 220 installed Electric
Vehicle chargers or 1.65 MT CO2e per charger (San Marcos, 2020). Based on the City’s CAP, each multi-family EV char ging station would reduce GHG emission by 1.65 MT CO 2e per a charger or 4.95 MT CO2e reduction from the 3 chargers required by the CAP measure.

Proposed Project Findings

Table 5.2 indicates that the Pr oject would generate 954.74 MT CO 2e per year without incorporating any CAP measures. The Project would however be required to implement CAP measures and these measures would further reduce GHG emissions. Since the intent of this analysis is to compare the proposed Project with the MU3 General Plan Buildout scenario, not all CAP measures were calculated. With the incorporation of CAP measure T-2, the provision of three Level 2 electric vehicle charging stations, the project would generate 949.79 MT CO 2e
as can be seen in Table 5.2.

Table 5.2: Proposed Project Operational Emissions Summary (MT/Year) Source Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
(MT/Yr)
Area 0.00 1.83 1.83 0.00 0.00 1.88
Energy 0.00 216.47 216.47 0.01 0.00 217.48
Mobile 0.00 618.74 618.74 0.05 0.03 628.77
Waste 14.10 0.00 14.10 0.83 0.00 34.93
Water 3.12 28.81 31.93 0.32 0.01 42.30
Operations Total 925.36
Construction Emissions (See Table5.1 above) 29.38
Construction and Operations 954.74
CAP Measures T-2: EV Charger Reduction -4.95
Project GHG Emissions 949.79
Data is presented in decimal format and may have rounding errors.

26 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report

5.3 MU3 General Plan Buildout Construction Emissions

The MU3 buildout scenario is assumed to have a similar construction footprint as the proposed project. A similar construction model was pr epared based on default settings though did include manual updates similar to the project to reflect identical cut/fill/import as well as rock breaking activities. The equipment list as well as durations are identical for the MU3 General Plan Buildout Scenario as shown in Table 4. 1 above. Table 5.3 shows the construction emissions from the MU3 General Plan Buildout Scenario. As noted, the construction emissions are not the same since the building land uses and areas are different.

Table 5.3: MU3 General Plan Annual Construction CO
2e Emissions Summary
Year Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
(MT)
2022 0.00 166.10 166.10 0.02 0.02 171.39
2023 0.00 874.39 874.39 0.10 0.06 893.28
2024 0.00 205.28 205.28 0.03 0.01 208.95
Total Construction Emissions 1,273.62
Yearly Average Construction Emissions (Metric Tons/year over 30 years) 42.45 Expected Construction emissions are based upon CalEEMod modeling assumptions for equipment and durations listed in Table 4.1.

5.4 MU3 General Plan Buildout Scenario Operational Emissions

Once construction is completed the MU3 General Plan Buildout scenario would generate GHG emissions from sources as described in Section 5.2 above. Under this scenario, since it is non- residential, not all the same CAP measures would apply. The CAP measures included for quantification such as EV Chargers and Solar are included.

The City’s CAP estimated that in the year 2030 based on a City wide analysis, 2,130 MT CO 2e
will be reduced from 234 installed commercial Electric Vehicle chargers or 9.10 MT CO2e per charger (San Marcos, 2020). Utilizing the same reductions for this site, the MU3 General Plan Buildout scenario would have 879 parking loca tions and would include 44 Electric Vehicle Charging Stations. Based on the City’s CAP, each commercial EV charging station would reduce GHG emission by 9.1 MT CO2e per a charger or 400.4 MT CO2e reduction from the 44 chargers required by the CAP measure. It shou ld be noted that these estimates are scaled down from CAP calculations for illustrative purposes only. Projects that may need to attribute quantified reductions to these measures in the future would conduct a project-specific bottom- up analysis of estimated reductions.

27 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report Based on the City’s CAP, the total cumulative PV system in San Marcos was 10.3 megawatts direct current (MWdc) and that amount of solar generated 17,585 megawatt hours (MWh) or 1,707.28 MWh per MWdc installed. Since it is assumed that all renewable energy sources generated by SDG&E or generated within SDG&Es service network, any renewable source added by the project would offset non-renewa ble generation. CalEEMod indicates that GHG intensities from electrical (identified in Table 4.2) could be as high as those generated in 2009 but would likely even be higher since in 2009, SDG&E received power from San Onofre Nuclear Generation Station. Based on the emission factors presented in the CAP, GHG emissions from solar would save roughly 651 lbs CO2e per MWh produced.

The MU3 General Plan Buildout scenario is 293, 411 SF and would therefore be required to install 586.8 kWdc of solar or 0.586 MWdc. Ba sed on this, the MU3 General Plan Buildout scenario would generate roughly 1,000.4 MWh of energy per year (1,707.28 MWh/MWdc *

0.586 MWdc) and would save 325.65 tons per year which converts to 295.42 MT CO 2e per
year since 1 US ton is equivalent to 0.907 MT.

Table 5.4 indicates that the MU3 General Plan Buildout Scenario would generate 3,964.92 MT CO2e per year without incorporating any CAP measures. This scenario would be required to implement all of the CAP measures identified in Section 2 of the CAP Checklist and these measures would further reduce GHG emissions though quantification is difficult. When reduction for CAP measures T-2 and E-2 are considered, the MU3 General Plan Buildout scenario would generate 3,269.10 MT CO
2e per year.

Table 5.4: MU3 General Plan Buildout Operational Emissions Summary (MT/Year) Source Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
(MT/Yr)
Area 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02
Energy 0.00 1069.60 1069.60 0.05 0.01 1074.25
Mobile 0.00 2453.97 2453.97 0.20 0.12 2495.21
Waste 55.84 0.00 55.84 3.30 0.00 138.34
Water 15.94 145.71 161.65 1.65 0.04 214.65
Operations Total 3,922.47
Construction Emissions (See Table5.1 above) 42.45
Construction and Operations 3,964.92
CAP Measure T-2: EV Charger Reduction -400.40
CAP Measures E-2: Solar PV Installation -295.42
MU3 General Plan Buildout Scenario Project GHG Emissions 3,269.10 Data is presented in decimal format and may have rounding errors.

28 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report Comparison of the Proposed Project and the MU3 General Plan Buildout Scenario

When the proposed Project’s GHG emissions are compared to the GHG emissions estimated under the MU3 General Plan Buildout scenario, the Project would have an estimated 70% less intense carbon footprint than would otherwise be assumed in the City’s General Plan or 949.79 MT CO2e per year compared to 3,269.10 MT CO 2e per year. This is driven largely by the reduced number of vehicle trips that would occur under the proposed project compared to buildout under the General Plan.

5.5 CEQA Compliance

SB 97 directed amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) statute to specifically establish that GHG emissions and their impacts are appropriate subjects for CEQA analysis. Under SB 97 the project should be able to answer the follow questions for CEQA compliance.

1. Will the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?

The City is committed to reducing its GHG emissions consistent with SB 32. Based on this requirement, the City’s CAP concludes that proposed General Plan amendments would be consistent with the CAP so long as the GHG emission generated by the amendment are less than would otherwise be produced by a consistent General Plan buildout scenario.

The proposed project was found to emit 949.79 MT CO
2e per year and the MU3 General Plan
Buildout scenario was estimated to generate 3,269.10 MT CO2e per year. The Project would therefore a less intense carbon footprint by an estimated 70% when compared to what would otherwise be assumed in the City’s General Plan. Given this, the project would be required to implement CAP measures applicable to the multi-family resident ial project. Based on this, a less than significant impact would be expected on the environment with respect the GHG emissions from the project.

2. Will the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?

The proposed project was found to emit 949.79 MT CO2e per year and the MU3 General Plan Buildout scenario would generate 3,269.10 MT CO2e per year. The Project would therefore result in a less intense carbon footprint by 70% when compared to what would otherwise be assumed in the City’s General Plan. CAP co nsistency can be assumed as long as the amendment results in an equivalent or less GHG-intensive project when compared to the

29 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report existing designations. In addition to providing evidence to support the conclusion that the project would generate fewer emissions than existing designations, these projects would demonstrate consistency with the CAP through completion of Step 2 of the Checklist. Based on this, a less than significant impact would be expected by the project and the Project.

30 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report

6.0 REFERENCES

Ascent. (2020). CAP Consistency Guidance Memo.

California Air Resources Board. (2012). www.arb.ca.gov. Retrieved from California Air Resources Board Approves Advanced Clean Car Rules:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/news/california-air-resources-board-approves-advanced- clean-car-rules
California Air Resources Board. (2017). Advanced Clean Cars Summary. Retrieved 2017, from www.arb.ca.gov:
https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/clean_cars/acc%20summary-final.pdf California Energy Commission. (2015, June 3). Retrieved from http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2016standards/rulemaking/documents/15- day_language/impact_analysis/2016_Impact_Analysis_2015-06-03.pdf California Energy Commission. (2017).

Docket Log 17-BSTD-01 - Rooftop Solar PV Stystem
Report (11-16-2017). Retrieved from
https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/Lists/DocketLog.aspx?docketnumber=17-BSTD-01 California Fuel Cell Partnership. (2017). www.cafcp.org. Retrieved from https://cafcp.org/stationmap
California Public Utilities Commission. (2016). Biennial RPS Program Update - In Compliance with Public Utilities Code Section 913.6. Retrieved from http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/uploadedFiles/CPUC_Website/Content/Utilities_and_Ind ustries/Energy/Reports_and_White_Papers/FINAL12302015Section913_6Report. pdf
CalRecycle. (2020). https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov. Retrieved from https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/Climate/
CAPCOA. (2021). CalEEMod Verision 2020.4.0 Calcuation Details (Appendix A). Retrieved from http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/user-guide- 2021/appendix-a2020-4-0.pdf?sfvrsn=6
CARB. (2017). California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. Retrieved from https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf CARB. (2017). Clean Car Standards - Pavley, Assembly Bill 1493. Retrieved from https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/ccms/ccms.htm
CARB. (2017). The Advanced Clean Cars Program. Retrieved from https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/acc/acc_conceptdraft.htm
CARB. (2018). https://ww2.arb.ca.gov. Retrieved 2021, from https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our- work/programs/sustainable-communities-program/regional-plan-targets:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov
CARB. (2018). ww2.arb.ca.gov. Retrieved 2021, from
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/lcfs-basics:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/low-carbon-fuel-standard/about

31 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report City of San Marcos. (2020). Appendix D - Guidance to Demonstrating Consistency with the City of San Marcos Climate tion Plan for Discretionary Projects Subject to CEQA and City of San Marcos Climate Action Plan Consistency Review Checklist.

Retrieved from https://www.san-
marcos.net/home/showpublisheddocument?id=25086
City of San Marcos. (2020).

Final Climate Action Plan. Retrieved from https://www.san- marcos.net/home/showpublisheddocument/25084/637435406644270000 City-Data. (2020). San Marcos City Data. Retrieved 2015, from http://www.city- data.com/city/San-Marcos-California.html#b
CPUC. (2016). Biennial RPS Program Update - In Compliance with Public Utilities Code Section 913.6. Retrieved from
http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/uploadedFiles/CPUC_Website/Content/Utilities_and_Ind ustries/Energy/Reports_and_White_Papers/FINAL12302015Section913_6Report. pdf
EPA, U. (1995). EPA-AP 42, Fifth Edition Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors. US EPA. Retrieved from www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch13/final/c13s03.pdf Google. (2021). Retrieved 2021, from maps.google.com
Google Earth Pro. (2021).

Housing and Community Development. (2019). 2019 Residnetial Occupancies Application Checklist. Retrieved from https://www.hcd.ca.gov/building- standards/calgreen/docs/hcdshl615c.pdf
International Code Council. (2019). 2019 California Green Building Standards Code - Title 24, Part 11. Retrieved from https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/CAGBSC2019/cover IPCC. (2007). IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007 : Working Group I:

The Physical Science Basis. Retrieved from
https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch2s2-10-2.html LDN Consulting. (2021). Barham Air Quality Assessment.

LLG Engineers. (2021). Barham Traffic Study.

LLG Engineers. (2021). Transportation Impact Analysis & Local Transportation Analysis - Hallmark Barham Specific Plan.

San Marcos. (2020). CAP Appendix B - Methods for Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions in the San Marcos Climate Action Plan.

SANDAG. (2018). Population Forcasts for San Marcos, CA. Retrieved from http://datasurfer.sandag.org/download/sandag_forecast_13_jurisdiction_san- marcos.pdf
SANDAG. (2021). Draft 2021 Regional Plan. Retrieved from https://sdforward.com/mobility- planning/2021-regional-plan-draft
SB&O, INC. (2021). Commercial Site Plan.

SB&O, INC. (2021). MU3 General Plan Buildout.

32 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 11/16/21 20-47 E Barham Residential GHG Report SCAQMD. (2008). Retrieved 2018, from http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance- thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-6/ghg-meeting-6-guidance-document- discussion.pdf
U.S. Departement of Energy. (2021). https://www.fueleconomy.gov. Retrieved from https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=42282 WRCC. (2018). Retrieved from
https://wrcc.dri.edu/Climate/comp_table_show.php?stype=wind_dir_avg WRCC. (2021). ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA (042862). Retrieved from https://wrcc.dri.edu/summary/Climsmsca.html: https://wrcc.dri.edu/cgi- bin/cliMAIN.pl?ca2862

ATTACHMENT A

CalEEMod Emission Model – Proposed Project

Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year
San Diego County, Annual
Project Characteristics - RPS 2030
Land Use - 10.55 acres
Construction Phase - CS
Off-road Equipment - Rock Crusher Added 310+/- HP
Off-road Equipment - CE
Trips and VMT -
Grading - 46341 CY of import
Architectural Coating - Rule 67 Paint
Vehicle Trips - Per Traffic Study
Vehicle Emission Factors -
Vehicle Emission Factors -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 66.00 Space 0.59 26,400.00 0
Condo/Townhouse 151.00 Dwelling Unit 9.96 151,000.00 432

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
13 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.6 40

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric
2030Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
322.38 0.02CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.002N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 1 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied l------------------------------1------------------------------~-------------------------t------------~-------------~---------------I Vehicle Emission Factors -
Woodstoves - No Hearth
Area Coating - Rule 67 Paint
Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - T4
Area Mitigation - default
Fleet Mix -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Parking 250.00 100.00
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 250.00 100.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 250.00 100.00 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Parking 250 100
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Exterior 250 100
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Interior 250 100
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintParkingValue 100 250
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintResidentialExteriorValu e
100 250
tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintResidentialInteriorValu e
100 250
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 2 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I
I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I
• I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I
• I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I
• I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I
• I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I
• I
-----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t-------------------------- • • I
• I
-----------------------------4-----------------------------~------------------------------~-------------------------- ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• + ............................................................. ► ......................... . ·····························+·····························•------------------------------t·························· • • I • • I
-----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • • I
-----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • • I
-----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • • I
-----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • • I
-----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • • I
-----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • • I
-----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • • I
-----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • • I
-----------------------------4------------------------------l------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • • I
-----------------------------4------------------------------I------------------------------~--------------------------. . . . . . tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 5.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 45.00
tblFireplaces NumberGas 83.05 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 15.10 151.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 52.85 0.00
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 34,755.00
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 11,585.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 9.44 9.96
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 85.00 310.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 1.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 3 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : :
-----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Rock Drilling
tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Grading
tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0.033 0.02 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 539.98 322.38 tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.004 0.002 tblVehicleTrips HO_TL 7.50 5.40
tblVehicleTrips HO_TTP 39.60 39.00
tblVehicleTrips HS_TL 7.30 5.40
tblVehicleTrips HS_TTP 18.80 19.00
tblVehicleTrips HW_TL 10.80 5.40
tblVehicleTrips HW_TTP 41.60 42.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.14 8.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.28 8.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 7.32 8.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 7.55 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 7.55 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 4 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : :
-----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.0521 0.7049 0.3710 1.7200e-
003

0.2146 0.0217 0.2362 0.0840 0.0201 0.1041 0.0000 164.8010 164.8010 0.0216 0.0159 170.0813 2023 0.2751 2.4102 2.6803 6.3100e-
003

0.2609 0.1018 0.3627 0.0775 0.0957 0.1731 0.0000 570.7432 570.7432 0.0915 0.0221 579.6118 2024 1.0172 0.5451 0.7539 1.4700e-
003

0.0373 0.0242 0.0615 0.0100 0.0227 0.0327 0.0000 130.5636 130.5636 0.0238 2.3500e- 003
131.8573
Maximum 1.0172 2.4102 2.6803 6.3100e-
003

0.2609 0.1018 0.3627 0.0840 0.0957 0.1731 0.0000 570.7432 570.7432 0.0915 0.0221 579.6118 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.0163 0.3057 0.4317 1.7200e-
003

0.2146 3.6400e-
003

0.2182 0.0840 3.5300e-
003

0.0876 0.0000 164.8009 164.8009 0.0216 0.0159 170.0812
2023 0.0944 0.6220 2.9156 6.3100e-
003

0.2609 8.8900e-
003

0.2697 0.0775 8.7500e-
003

0.0862 0.0000 570.7427 570.7427 0.0915 0.0221 579.6114
2024 0.9735 0.1125 0.8186 1.4700e-
003

0.0373 1.9700e-
003

0.0393 0.0100 1.9500e-
003

0.0120 0.0000 130.5635 130.5635 0.0238 2.3500e-
003
131.8571
Maximum 0.9735 0.6220 2.9156 6.3100e-
003

0.2609 8.8900e-
003

0.2697 0.0840 8.7500e-
003

0.0876 0.0000 570.7427 570.7427 0.0915 0.0221 579.6114
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 5 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I I
I
•• I •• I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"-------1' - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------,- - - - - - - -I •• I •• I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"-------1' - - - - - - -,--------,-------,-------,-------,- - - - - - - - ., .,
I I
I
I
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

19.35 71.58 -9.48 0.00 0.00 90.18 20.16 0.00 89.73 40.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 1.5480 0.6018
2 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 0.5717 0.1316
3 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 0.5708 0.1306
4 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 0.5665 0.1311
5 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 0.7779 0.3583
6 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 0.9719 0.7722
Highest 1.5480 0.7722
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 6 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.7198 0.0129 1.1188 6.0000e-
005

6.2200e-
003

0.0000 1.8326 1.8326 1.7500e-
003

0.0000 1.8763
Energy 0.0109 0.0934 0.0397 6.0000e-
004

7.5500e-
003

0.0000 216.4738 216.4738 8.7900e-
003

2.6500e-
003
217.4848
Mobile 0.3867 0.3540 3.2687 6.3300e-
003

0.7886 4.5500e-
003

0.7932 0.2105 4.2400e-
003

0.2147 0.0000 618.7394 618.7394 0.0477 0.0297 628.7666
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 14.0998 0.0000 14.0998 0.8333 0.0000 34.9315 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.1212 28.8090 31.9302 0.3224 7.7500e- 003

42.2983
Total 1.1174 0.4603 4.4273 6.9900e-
003

0.7886 0.0183 0.8070 0.2105 0.0180 0.2285 17.2210 865.8548 883.0758 1.2139 0.0401 925.3576 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 7 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I

6.2200e-
003

0.0000 1.8326 1.8326 1.7500e-
003

0.0000 1.8763
Energy 0.0109 0.0934 0.0397 6.0000e-
004

7.5500e-
003

0.0000 216.4738 216.4738 8.7900e-
003

2.6500e-
003
217.4848
Mobile 0.3867 0.3540 3.2687 6.3300e-
003

0.7886 4.5500e-
003

0.7932 0.2105 4.2400e-
003

42.2983
Total 1.1174 0.4603 4.4273 6.9900e-
003

0.7886 0.0183 0.8070 0.2105 0.0180 0.2285 17.2210 865.8548 883.0758 1.2139 0.0401 925.3576 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 12/1/2022 12/14/2022 5 10 2 Rock Drilling Grading 12/15/2022 12/21/2022 5 5
3 Grading Grading 12/15/2022 1/25/2023 5 30
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 8 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
■ ■ I
-------~------------------------=-----------------------1------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- ■ ■ I I I I I
■ ■ I I I I I
-------~------------------------~----------------------+-------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- 4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/26/2023 3/20/2024 5 300 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/15/2024 4/17/2024 5 45 6 Paving Paving 3/21/2024 4/17/2024 5 20
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Rock Drilling Bore/Drill Rigs 1 3.00 221 0.50
Grading Crushing/Proc. Equipment 1 8.00 310 0.78
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Residential Indoor: 305,775; Residential Outdoor: 101,925; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 1,584 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 0.59
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 9 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : :
-------•------------------------•-----------------------+------------+------------+--------+--------•-------------------------• ■ I I I I I ■ ■ 1 I I I I
-------J------------------------~---------------------- ..... ------------~------------~--------~--------~-------------------------. .

I
. .

I
I
I
I I
----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I ----------------------------=---------------------------~---------------- -------------~--------+--------------' I I I ----------------------------~---------------------------1----------------- ~ ------------1--------------~--------------. .

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0991 0.0000 0.0991 0.0506 0.0000 0.0506 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e-
004

8.0600e-
003

7.4200e-
003

0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e-
003

0.0000 16.8549
Total 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e-
004

0.0991 8.0600e-
003

0.1072 0.0506 7.4200e-
003

0.0581 0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e-
003

0.0000 16.8549
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 1,448.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Rock Drilling 1 3.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 9 23.00 0.00 4,344.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 120.00 20.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 24.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 10 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied • I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · -:---------------1-----------1-· · · · · · · · · ~----------1-----------1-----------1----------I--------------I-----------I- · · · · -· · · · · • I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I
· · · · · · -· · · · --· · -:---------------1-----------1-· · · · -· · · · ~----------1-----------1-----------1----------I--------------I-----------I- · · · · -· · · · · • I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I
· · · · · · · · · · · · -· · -:---------------1-----------1-· · · · -· · · · ~----------1-----------1-----------1----------I--------------I-----------I- · · · · -· · · · · • I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I
-· · · · --· · · · --· · -:---------------1-----------1-· · · · --· · · ~----------1-----------1-----------1----------I--------------I-----------I- · · · · -- · · · · • I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I
----------------~---------------1-----------~---------+---------~-----------I-----------~---------~------------~---------!----------- I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
-----------··-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------"T"-------• ---------------,-------,-------,-------,--------I I I I

0.1219 0.0288 4.5000e-
004

0.0124 1.1300e-
003

0.0135 3.4100e-
003

1.0800e-
003

4.4900e-
003

0.0000 45.3812 45.3812 2.1800e-
003

7.2100e-
003

47.5841
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.6000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

2.2100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000 7.3000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000 2.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.5936 0.5936 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.5991
Total 3.4700e-
003

0.1221 0.0310 4.6000e-
004

0.0131 1.1300e-
003

0.0143 3.6000e-
003

1.0800e-
003

4.6900e-
003

0.0000 45.9748 45.9748 2.2000e-
003

7.2300e-
003

48.1832
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0991 0.0000 0.0991 0.0506 0.0000 0.0506 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.3300e-
003

0.0101 0.1043 1.9000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e-
003

0.0000 16.8549
Total 2.3300e-
003

0.0101 0.1043 1.9000e-
004

0.0991 3.1000e-
004

0.0994 0.0506 3.1000e-
004

0.0510 0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e-
003

0.0000 16.8549
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 11 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

0.1219 0.0288 4.5000e-
004

0.0124 1.1300e-
003

0.0135 3.4100e-
003

1.0800e-
003

4.4900e-
003

0.0000 45.3812 45.3812 2.1800e-
003

7.2100e-
003

47.5841
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.6000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

2.2100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000 7.3000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000 2.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.5936 0.5936 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.5991
Total 3.4700e-
003

0.1221 0.0310 4.6000e-
004

0.0131 1.1300e-
003

0.0143 3.6000e-
003

1.0800e-
003

4.6900e-
003

0.0000 45.9748 45.9748 2.2000e-
003

7.2300e-
003

48.1832
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

2.1200e-
003

1.9100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.7770 0.7770 2.5000e-
004

0.0000 0.7833
Total 2.1000e-
004

2.1200e-
003

1.9100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 7.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

0.0000 6.0000e-
005

6.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.7770 0.7770 2.5000e-
004

0.0000 0.7833
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 12 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

3.3 Rock Drilling - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

1.8000e-
004

0.0000 6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0495 0.0495 0.0000 0.0000 0.0499
Total 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

1.8000e-
004

0.0000 6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0495 0.0495 0.0000 0.0000 0.0499
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.1000e-
004

4.8000e-
004

4.0200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.7770 0.7770 2.5000e-
004

0.0000 0.7833
Total 1.1000e-
004

4.8000e-
004

4.0200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.7770 0.7770 2.5000e-
004

0.0000 0.7833
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 13 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

2.0000e-
005

1.8000e-
004

0.0000 6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0495 0.0495 0.0000 0.0000 0.0499
Total 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

1.8000e-
004

0.0000 6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0495 0.0495 0.0000 0.0000 0.0499
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0863 0.0000 0.0863 0.0254 0.0000 0.0254 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0283 0.2686 0.2016 5.0000e-
004

0.0110 0.0110 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 45.9126 45.9126 0.0111 0.0000 46.1905 Total 0.0283 0.2686 0.2016 5.0000e-
004

0.0863 0.0110 0.0973 0.0254 0.0103 0.0356 0.0000 45.9126 45.9126 0.0111 0.0000 46.1905 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 14 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.8500e-
003

0.1463 0.0345 5.5000e-
004

0.0149 1.3600e-
003

0.0162 4.0900e-
003

1.3000e-
003

5.3900e-
003

0.0000 54.4574 54.4574 2.6200e-
003

8.6500e-
003

57.1009
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

3.3900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1100e-
003

2.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.9101 0.9101 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.9187
Total 4.2500e-
003

0.1466 0.0379 5.6000e-
004

0.0160 1.3700e-
003

0.0174 4.3800e-
003

1.3100e-
003

5.6900e-
003

0.0000 55.3676 55.3676 2.6500e-
003

8.6800e-
003

58.0195
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0863 0.0000 0.0863 0.0254 0.0000 0.0254 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.1000e-
003

0.0265 0.2543 5.0000e-
004

8.1000e-
004

0.0000 45.9125 45.9125 0.0111 0.0000 46.1904
Total 6.1000e-
003

0.0265 0.2543 5.0000e-
004

0.0863 8.1000e-
004

0.0871 0.0254 8.1000e-
004

0.0262 0.0000 45.9125 45.9125 0.0111 0.0000 46.1904
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 15 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.8500e-
003

0.1463 0.0345 5.5000e-
004

0.0149 1.3600e-
003

0.0162 4.0900e-
003

1.3000e-
003

5.3900e-
003

0.0000 54.4574 54.4574 2.6200e-
003

8.6500e-
003

57.1009
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

3.3900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1100e-
003

2.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.9101 0.9101 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.9187
Total 4.2500e-
003

0.1466 0.0379 5.6000e-
004

0.0160 1.3700e-
003

0.0174 4.3800e-
003

1.3100e-
003

5.6900e-
003

0.0000 55.3676 55.3676 2.6500e-
003

8.6800e-
003

58.0195
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1044 0.0000 0.1044 0.0353 0.0000 0.0353 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0393 0.3577 0.2933 7.5000e-
004

0.0144 0.0144 0.0134 0.0134 0.0000 68.8694 68.8694 0.0166 0.0000 69.2854 Total 0.0393 0.3577 0.2933 7.5000e-
004

0.1044 0.0144 0.1188 0.0353 0.0134 0.0487 0.0000 68.8694 68.8694 0.0166 0.0000 69.2854 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 16 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.8800e-
003

0.1769 0.0471 7.8000e-
004

0.0223 1.4500e-
003

0.0238 6.1300e-
003

1.3900e-
003

7.5200e-
003

0.0000 78.2109 78.2109 3.9400e-
003

0.0124 82.0159
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.6000e-
004

3.9000e-
004

4.7300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.6600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.6700e-
003

4.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.3300 1.3300 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

1.3419
Total 3.4400e-
003

0.1773 0.0518 7.9000e-
004

0.0240 1.4600e-
003

0.0254 6.5700e-
003

1.4000e-
003

7.9700e-
003

0.0000 79.5409 79.5409 3.9800e-
003

0.0125 83.3578
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1044 0.0000 0.1044 0.0353 0.0000 0.0353 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 9.1600e-
003

0.0397 0.3814 7.5000e-
004

1.2200e-
003

0.0000 68.8693 68.8693 0.0166 0.0000 69.2853
Total 9.1600e-
003

0.0397 0.3814 7.5000e-
004

0.1044 1.2200e-
003

0.1056 0.0353 1.2200e-
003

0.0365 0.0000 68.8693 68.8693 0.0166 0.0000 69.2853
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 17 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.8800e-
003

0.1769 0.0471 7.8000e-
004

0.0223 1.4500e-
003

0.0238 6.1300e-
003

1.3900e-
003

7.5200e-
003

0.0000 78.2109 78.2109 3.9400e-
003

0.0124 82.0159
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.6000e-
004

3.9000e-
004

4.7300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.6600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.6700e-
003

4.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.3300 1.3300 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

1.3419
Total 3.4400e-
003

0.1773 0.0518 7.9000e-
004

0.0240 1.4600e-
003

0.0254 6.5700e-
003

1.4000e-
003

7.9700e-
003

0.0000 79.5409 79.5409 3.9800e-
003

0.0125 83.3578
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0847 0.0847 0.0797 0.0797 0.0000 280.4837 280.4837 0.0667 0.0000 282.1518 Total 0.1903 1.7406 1.9655 3.2600e-
003

0.0847 0.0847 0.0797 0.0797 0.0000 280.4837 280.4837 0.0667 0.0000 282.1518 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 18 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' '

I I I I
' ' ' '
' '
I I
I
I I I
I I
I
I
' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.8400e-
003

0.1074 0.0379 5.0000e-
004

0.0161 6.3000e-
004

0.0167 4.6400e-
003

6.1000e-
004

5.2500e-
003

0.0000 48.5574 48.5574 1.4700e-
003

7.0400e-
003

50.6908
Worker 0.0393 0.0272 0.3318 1.0000e-
003

0.1164 6.4000e-
004

0.1171 0.0309 5.9000e-
004

0.0315 0.0000 93.2917 93.2917 2.7300e-
003

2.5700e-
003

94.1261
Total 0.0421 0.1346 0.3697 1.5000e-
003

0.1325 1.2700e-
003

0.1338 0.0356 1.2000e-
003

0.0368 0.0000 141.8491 141.8491 4.2000e-
003

9.6100e-
003
144.8168
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0397 0.2704 2.1127 3.2600e-
003

4.9400e-
003

0.0000 280.4834 280.4834 0.0667 0.0000 282.1515
Total 0.0397 0.2704 2.1127 3.2600e-
003

4.9400e-
003

0.0000 280.4834 280.4834 0.0667 0.0000 282.1515
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 19 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' '

I I I I
' ' ' '
' '
I I
I
I I I
I I
I
I
' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I

0.1074 0.0379 5.0000e-
004

0.0161 6.3000e-
004

0.0167 4.6400e-
003

6.1000e-
004

5.2500e-
003

0.0000 48.5574 48.5574 1.4700e-
003

7.0400e-
003

50.6908
Worker 0.0393 0.0272 0.3318 1.0000e-
003

0.1164 6.4000e-
004

0.1171 0.0309 5.9000e-
004

0.0315 0.0000 93.2917 93.2917 2.7300e-
003

2.5700e-
003

94.1261
Total 0.0421 0.1346 0.3697 1.5000e-
003

0.1325 1.2700e-
003

0.1338 0.0356 1.2000e-
003

0.0368 0.0000 141.8491 141.8491 4.2000e-
003

9.6100e-
003
144.8168
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0427 0.3899 0.4688 7.8000e-
004

0.0178 0.0178 0.0167 0.0167 0.0000 67.2362 67.2362 0.0159 0.0000 67.6337 Total 0.0427 0.3899 0.4688 7.8000e-
004

0.0178 0.0178 0.0167 0.0167 0.0000 67.2362 67.2362 0.0159 0.0000 67.6337 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 20 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' '

I I I I
' ' ' '
' '
I I
I
I I I
I I
I
I
' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I

0.0256 8.8700e-
003

1.2000e-
004

3.8500e-
003

1.5000e-
004

4.0000e-
003

1.1100e-
003

1.5000e-
004

1.2600e-
003

0.0000 11.4350 11.4350 3.6000e-
004

1.6600e-
003

11.9377
Worker 8.8500e-
003

5.8600e-
003

0.0744 2.3000e-
004

0.0279 1.5000e-
004

0.0281 7.4200e-
003

1.3000e-
004

7.5500e-
003

0.0000 21.7988 21.7988 6.0000e-
004

5.8000e-
004

21.9853
Total 9.5100e-
003

0.0314 0.0833 3.5000e-
004

0.0318 3.0000e-
004

0.0321 8.5300e-
003

2.8000e-
004

8.8100e-
003

0.0000 33.2339 33.2339 9.6000e-
004

2.2400e-
003

33.9230
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 9.5100e-
003

0.0648 0.5064 7.8000e-
004

1.1800e-
003

0.0000 67.2362 67.2362 0.0159 0.0000 67.6337
Total 9.5100e-
003

0.0648 0.5064 7.8000e-
004

1.1800e-
003

0.0000 67.2362 67.2362 0.0159 0.0000 67.6337
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 21 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' '

I I I I
' ' ' '
' '
I I
I
I I I
I I
I
I
' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I

0.0256 8.8700e-
003

1.2000e-
004

3.8500e-
003

1.5000e-
004

4.0000e-
003

1.1100e-
003

1.5000e-
004

1.2600e-
003

0.0000 11.4350 11.4350 3.6000e-
004

1.6600e-
003

11.9377
Worker 8.8500e-
003

5.8600e-
003

0.0744 2.3000e-
004

0.0279 1.5000e-
004

0.0281 7.4200e-
003

1.3000e-
004

7.5500e-
003

0.0000 21.7988 21.7988 6.0000e-
004

5.8000e-
004

21.9853
Total 9.5100e-
003

0.0314 0.0833 3.5000e-
004

0.0318 3.0000e-
004

0.0321 8.5300e-
003

2.8000e-
004

8.8100e-
003

0.0000 33.2339 33.2339 9.6000e-
004

2.2400e-
003

33.9230
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0274 0.0407 7.0000e-
005

1.3700e-
003

0.0000 5.7448 5.7448 3.2000e-
004

0.0000 5.7529
Total 0.9526 0.0274 0.0407 7.0000e-
005

1.3700e-
003

0.0000 5.7448 5.7448 3.2000e-
004

0.0000 5.7529
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 22 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.3700e-
003

9.1000e-
004

0.0116 4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.3500e-
003

1.1500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000 3.3826 3.3826 9.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
005

3.4115
Total 1.3700e-
003

9.1000e-
004

0.0116 4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.3500e-
003

1.1500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000 3.3826 3.3826 9.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
005

3.4115
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.9485 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.7000e-
004

2.9000e-
003

0.0412 7.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.7448 5.7448 3.2000e-
004

0.0000 5.7529
Total 0.9492 2.9000e-
003

0.0412 7.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.7448 5.7448 3.2000e-
004

0.0000 5.7529
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 23 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

9.1000e-
004

0.0116 4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.3500e-
003

1.1500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000 3.3826 3.3826 9.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
005

3.4115
Total 1.3700e-
003

9.1000e-
004

0.0116 4.0000e-
005

4.3300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

4.3500e-
003

1.1500e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.1700e-
003

0.0000 3.3826 3.3826 9.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
005

3.4115
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 9.8800e-
003

0.0953 0.1463 2.3000e-
004

4.6900e-
003

4.3100e-
003

0.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e-
003

0.0000 20.1885
Paving 7.7000e-
004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0107 0.0953 0.1463 2.3000e-
004

4.6900e-
003

4.3100e-
003

0.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e-
003

0.0000 20.1885
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 24 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

3.7 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.8000e-
004

2.5000e-
004

3.2100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.9396 0.9396 3.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.9476
Total 3.8000e-
004

2.5000e-
004

3.2100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.9396 0.9396 3.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.9476
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 2.8000e-
003

0.0122 0.1730 2.3000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

0.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e-
003

0.0000 20.1884
Paving 7.7000e-
004

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.5700e-
003

0.0122 0.1730 2.3000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

0.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e-
003

0.0000 20.1884
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 25 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

2.5000e-
004

3.2100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.9396 0.9396 3.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.9476
Total 3.8000e-
004

2.5000e-
004

3.2100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.9396 0.9396 3.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.9476
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 26 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I I
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.3867 0.3540 3.2687 6.3300e-
003

0.7886 4.5500e-
003

0.7932 0.2105 4.2400e-
003

0.2147 0.0000 618.7394 618.7394 0.0477 0.0297 628.7666
Unmitigated 0.3867 0.3540 3.2687 6.3300e-
003

0.7886 4.5500e-
003

0.7932 0.2105 4.2400e-
003

0.2147 0.0000 618.7394 618.7394 0.0477 0.0297 628.7666

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Condo/Townhouse 1,208.00 1,208.00 1208.00 2,108,639 2,108,639 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1,208.00 1,208.00 1,208.00 2,108,639 2,108,639
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Condo/Townhouse 5.40 5.40 5.40 42.00 19.00 39.00 86 11 3 Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Condo/Townhouse 0.575453 0.061728 0.171227 0.112384 0.022882 0.006522 0.009800 0.006298 0.000679 0.000623 0.027611 0.000857 0.003936 Parking Lot 0.575453 0.061728 0.171227 0.112384 0.022882 0.006522 0.009800 0.006298 0.000679 0.000623 0.027611 0.000857 0.003936

5.0 Energy Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 27 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I
■ I I ■ ■ •
• I I • I I ■ ••
~ ■ ■ • • • • ■ • • • • • • • • • • • • ■ • • • ., • • • • • • • • • • ,. • • • • • • • • • T • • • • • • • • • • ,r • • • • • • • • ·r • • • • • • • • ·r • • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • • • • • r • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .

I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I ; I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I
------------------------~---------=----------l----------l----------l----------l----------l----------1----------1----------I----------I----------I---------~-------- ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 108.3058 108.3058 6.7200e- 003

6.7000e-
004
108.6740
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 108.3058 108.3058 6.7200e- 003

6.7000e-
004
108.6740
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0109 0.0934 0.0397 6.0000e-
004

7.5500e-
003

0.0000 108.1680 108.1680 2.0700e-
003

1.9800e-
003
108.8108
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0109 0.0934 0.0397 6.0000e-
004

7.5500e-
003

0.0000 108.1680 108.1680 2.0700e-
003

1.9800e-
003
108.8108

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 28 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied .. .. I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• •• I •• I I ■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------.,..-------••••••••·-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• •• I •• I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
----------- .,..-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------· ------ -~-------,--------,--------,-------"T -------.. ..

2.02699e
+006

0.0109 0.0934 0.0397 6.0000e-
004

7.5500e-
003

0.0000 108.1680 108.1680 2.0700e-
003

1.9800e-
003
108.8108
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.0934 0.0397 6.0000e-
004

7.5500e-
003

0.0000 108.1680 108.1680 2.0700e-
003

1.9800e-
003
108.8108
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e

2.02699e
+006

0.0109 0.0934 0.0397 6.0000e-
004

7.5500e-
003

0.0000 108.1680 108.1680 2.0700e-
003

1.9800e-
003
108.8108
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.0934 0.0397 6.0000e-
004

7.5500e-
003

0.0000 108.1680 108.1680 2.0700e-
003

1.9800e-
003
108.8108
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 29 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I
I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••r--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I, I

I, I I, I I, I
I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••r--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------T-------••••••••1-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I, I I, I I, I 1, I

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e
731418 106.9547 6.6400e-
003

6.6000e-
004
107.3183
Parking Lot 9240 1.3512 8.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.3558
Total 108.3058 6.7200e-
003

6.7000e-
004
108.6740
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e
731418 106.9547 6.6400e-
003

6.6000e-
004
107.3183
Parking Lot 9240 1.3512 8.0000e-
005

1.0000e-
005

1.3558
Total 108.3058 6.7200e-
003

6.7000e-
004
108.6740
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 30 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied L
L
L
I 11 I I I
•••••••••••r--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L L
L
L
L
I 1 1 I I I
•••••••••••r--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L
L

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.7198 0.0129 1.1188 6.0000e-
005

6.2200e-
003

0.0000 1.8326 1.8326 1.7500e-
003

0.0000 1.8763
Unmitigated 0.7198 0.0129 1.1188 6.0000e-
005

6.2200e-
003

0.0000 1.8326 1.8326 1.7500e-
003

0.0000 1.8763
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 31 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
----------- ~-------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------• ------ -r--------,--------,--------,--------.--------., ., ., .,

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.0949 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.5914 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 0.0335 0.0129 1.1188 6.0000e-
005

6.2200e-
003

0.0000 1.8326 1.8326 1.7500e-
003

0.0000 1.8763
Total 0.7198 0.0129 1.1188 6.0000e-
005

6.2200e-
003

0.0000 1.8326 1.8326 1.7500e-
003

0.0000 1.8763
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 32 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.0949 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

6.2200e-
003

0.0000 1.8326 1.8326 1.7500e-
003

0.0000 1.8763
Total 0.7198 0.0129 1.1188 6.0000e-
005

6.2200e-
003

0.0000 1.8326 1.8326 1.7500e-
003

0.0000 1.8763
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 33 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 31.9302 0.3224 7.7500e-
003

42.2983
Unmitigated 31.9302 0.3224 7.7500e-
003

42.2983

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e

9.83826 /

6.20238

31.9302 0.3224 7.7500e-
003

42.2983
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 31.9302 0.3224 7.7500e-
003

42.2983
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 34 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., .,
I I I
■ I I I I
. -----. ----~-------,.-------.--------r --. ----., .,
I,
I, ,.

I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • ,- - - - - - - '81--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I,
I,
,. ,.

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e

9.83826 /

6.20238

31.9302 0.3224 7.7500e-
003

42.2983
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 31.9302 0.3224 7.7500e-
003

42.2983
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 14.0998 0.8333 0.0000 34.9315
Unmitigated 14.0998 0.8333 0.0000 34.9315
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 35 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1,
1,
1,
I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • .,
1,
1,
1,
I,
I I I
■ I I I I
. --. -----. -.... ------..-----------------,. -----. - ., .,

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e

69.46 14.0998 0.8333 0.0000 34.9315
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 14.0998 0.8333 0.0000 34.9315
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Condo/Townhous
e

69.46 14.0998 0.8333 0.0000 34.9315
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 14.0998 0.8333 0.0000 34.9315
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:56 AMPage 36 of 37 Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1,
1,
1,
I 11 I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - r- - - - - - - .. ,-------,--------,-------"T - - - - - - -1, 1,
1,
I,
I,
I,
I,
I 11 I I I
- - - - - - - - - - - r- - - - - - - •1--------,--------,-------"T -------I, I,
I,
1,

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type

Page 37 of 37 ends

Barham 151 Unit Multi-Family Operational Year - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

ATTACHMENT B

CalEEMod Emission Model – MU3 General Plan Buildout Scenario

Barham MU3 Scenario
San Diego County, Annual
Project Characteristics - RPS 2030
Land Use - 10.55 acre
Construction Phase - Construction Schedule
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment - Rock Crusher 310 HP+/-
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment - Rock Drill used for limited blasting if needed Trips and VMT -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 275.07 1000sqft 6.31 275,067.00 0 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 679.00 Space 2.02 271,600.00 0 Parking Lot 200.00 Space 1.80 80,000.00 0
Strip Mall 18.34 1000sqft 0.42 18,344.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
13 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.6 40

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric
2030Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
322.38 0.0197CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.0024N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 1 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I
1 I
• • I I I
------------------------------ ;. ------------------------------ -=- ----------------------------- -1-- - - - - - - - - - - - --1- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • • I I I
■ • I I I
------------------------------ ;. ------------------------------ -=- ----------------------------- -1-- - - - - - - - - - - - --1- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • • I I I
■ • I I I
------------------------------1------------------------------~------------------------------wi---------------~-----------------~--------------- Grading -
Architectural Coating - Rule 67 Paint
Vehicle Trips - Per TS
Area Coating - Rule 67 Paints
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Tier 4
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 100.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 100.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Parking 250.00 100.00
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 100
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 100
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Parking 250 100
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 2 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I
I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------t--------------------------• • I • I
-----------------------------~------------------------------1------------------------------~-------------------------- tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 5.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 45.00
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 34,755.00
tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 11,585.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 275,070.00 275,067.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 18,340.00 18,344.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 6.11 2.02
tblOffRoadEquipment HorsePower 85.00 310.00
tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 1.00 tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Grading
tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0.033 0.0197 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 539.98 322.38 tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.004 0.0024 tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 5.40
tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 5.40
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 3 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : :
-----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y------------------------------.------------------------------

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 5.40
tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 5.40
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 5.40
tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 5.40
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.21 17.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 42.04 40.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.70 17.00
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 20.43 40.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.74 17.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 44.32 40.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 4 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : :
-----------------------------+-----------------------------+------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y•-----------------------------.------------------------------ ■ ■
-----------------------------y-------------------------------------------------------------

0.2146 0.0218 0.2364 0.0840 0.0202 0.1043 0.0000 166.0959 166.0959 0.0220 0.0159 171.3867 2023 0.3273 2.8998 3.1805 9.4600e-
003

0.4483 0.1052 0.5535 0.1289 0.0989 0.2278 0.0000 874.3865 874.3865 0.1006 0.0550 893.2770 2024 1.4923 0.6620 0.8792 2.2500e-
003

0.0866 0.0250 0.1116 0.0235 0.0235 0.0470 0.0000 205.2789 205.2789 0.0260 0.0101 208.9527 Maximum 1.4923 2.8998 3.1805 9.4600e-
003

0.4483 0.1052 0.5535 0.1289 0.0989 0.2278 0.0000 874.3865 874.3865 0.1006 0.0550 893.2770 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.0165 0.3065 0.4384 1.7300e-
003

0.2146 3.6700e-
003

0.2182 0.0840 3.5600e-
003

0.0876 0.0000 166.0959 166.0959 0.0220 0.0159 171.3866
2023 0.1465 1.1116 3.4158 9.4600e-
003

0.4483 0.0123 0.4606 0.1289 0.0120 0.1408 0.0000 874.3861 874.3861 0.1006 0.0550 893.2766 2024 1.4486 0.2293 0.9439 2.2500e-
003

0.0866 2.8000e-
003

0.0894 0.0235 2.7400e-
003

0.0262 0.0000 205.2788 205.2788 0.0260 0.0101 208.9526
Maximum 1.4486 1.1116 3.4158 9.4600e-
003

0.4483 0.0123 0.4606 0.1289 0.0120 0.1408 0.0000 874.3861 874.3861 0.1006 0.0550 893.2766 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 5 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I I
I
•• I •• I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"-------1' - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------,- - - - - - - -I •• I •• I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"-------1' - - - - - - -,--------,-------,-------,-------,- - - - - - - - ., .,
I I
I
I
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

13.91 61.42 -8.21 0.00 0.00 87.68 14.78 0.00 87.20 32.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 1.6069 0.6579
2 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 0.7163 0.2762
3 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 0.7130 0.2729
4 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 0.7117 0.2764
5 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 1.0339 0.6143
6 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 1.3579 1.1582
Highest 1.6069 1.1582
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 6 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0210 0.0210 5.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0223
Energy 0.0299 0.2721 0.2285 1.6300e-
003

0.0207 0.0207 0.0207 0.0207 0.0000 1,069.596
8 1,069.596
8 0.0529 0.0112 1,074.254
2 Mobile 1.6418 1.4529 13.4125 0.0251 3.1109 0.0183 3.1292 0.8302 0.0171 0.8472 0.0000 2,453.968 3 2,453.968
3 0.1971 0.1219 2,495.214
2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 55.8388 0.0000 55.8388 3.3000 0.0000 138.3382 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 15.9413 145.7071 161.6484 1.6462 0.0398 214.6482 Total 2.9822 1.7251 13.6517 0.0267 3.1109 0.0390 3.1499 0.8302 0.0378 0.8679 71.7800 3,669.293 1 3,741.073
1 5.1963 0.1728 3,922.477
1 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 7 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I

0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0210 0.0210 5.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0223
Energy 0.0299 0.2721 0.2285 1.6300e-
003

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 12/1/2022 12/14/2022 5 10 2 Grading Grading 12/15/2022 1/25/2023 5 30
3 Rock Drilling Grading 12/15/2022 12/21/2022 5 5
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 8 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
■ ■ I
-------~------------------------=-----------------------1------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- ■ ■ I I I I I
■ ■ I I I I I
-------~------------------------~----------------------+-------------~------------~--------~--------~------------------------- 4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/26/2023 3/20/2024 5 300 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/15/2024 4/17/2024 5 45 6 Paving Paving 3/21/2024 4/17/2024 5 20
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Crushing/Proc. Equipment 1 8.00 310 0.78
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Rock Drilling Bore/Drill Rigs 1 8.00 221 0.50
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 440,117; Non-Residential Outdoor: 146,706; Striped Parking Area:
21,096 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 90
Acres of Paving: 3.82
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 9 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied : :
-------•------------------------•-----------------------+------------+------------+--------+--------•-------------------------• ■ I I I I I ■ ■ 1 I I I I
-------J------------------------~---------------------- ..... ------------~------------~--------~--------~-------------------------. .

I
. .

8.0600e-
003

7.4200e-
003

0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e-
003

0.0000 16.8549
Total 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e-
004

0.0991 8.0600e-
003

0.1072 0.0506 7.4200e-
003

0.0581 0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e-
003

0.0000 16.8549
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 1,448.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 9 23.00 0.00 4,344.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Rock Drilling 1 3.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 242.00 106.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 48.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 10 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied • I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · -:---------------1-----------1-· · · · · · · · · ~----------1-----------1-----------1----------I--------------I-----------I- · · · · -· · · · · • I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I
· · · · · · -· · · · --· · -:---------------1-----------1-· · · · -· · · · ~----------1-----------1-----------1----------I--------------I-----------I- · · · · -· · · · · • I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I
· · · · · · · · · · · · -· · -:---------------1-----------1-· · · · -· · · · ~----------1-----------1-----------1----------I--------------I-----------I- · · · · -· · · · · • I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I
-· · · · --· · · · --· · -:---------------1-----------1-· · · · --· · · ~----------1-----------1-----------1----------I--------------I-----------I- · · · · -- · · · · • I I I I I I I I I
• I I I I I I I I I
----------------~---------------1-----------~---------+---------~-----------I-----------~---------~------------~---------!----------- I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
-----------··-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------"T"-------• ---------------,-------,-------,-------,--------I I I I

0.1219 0.0288 4.5000e-
004

0.0124 1.1300e-
003

0.0135 3.4100e-
003

1.0800e-
003

4.4900e-
003

0.0000 45.3812 45.3812 2.1800e-
003

7.2100e-
003

47.5841
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.6000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

2.2100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000 7.3000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000 2.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.5936 0.5936 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.5991
Total 3.4700e-
003

0.1221 0.0310 4.6000e-
004

0.0131 1.1300e-
003

0.0143 3.6000e-
003

1.0800e-
003

4.6900e-
003

0.0000 45.9748 45.9748 2.2000e-
003

7.2300e-
003

0.0101 0.1043 1.9000e-
004

3.1000e-
004

0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e-
003

0.0000 16.8549
Total 2.3300e-
003

0.0101 0.1043 1.9000e-
004

0.0991 3.1000e-
004

0.0994 0.0506 3.1000e-
004

0.0510 0.0000 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e-
003

0.0000 16.8549
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 11 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

0.1219 0.0288 4.5000e-
004

0.0124 1.1300e-
003

0.0135 3.4100e-
003

1.0800e-
003

4.4900e-
003

0.0000 45.3812 45.3812 2.1800e-
003

7.2100e-
003

47.5841
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.6000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

2.2100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.2000e-
004

0.0000 7.3000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

0.0000 2.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.5936 0.5936 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.5991
Total 3.4700e-
003

0.1221 0.0310 4.6000e-
004

0.0131 1.1300e-
003

0.0143 3.6000e-
003

1.0800e-
003

4.6900e-
003

0.0000 45.9748 45.9748 2.2000e-
003

7.2300e-
003

48.1832
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0863 0.0000 0.0863 0.0254 0.0000 0.0254 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0283 0.2686 0.2016 5.0000e-
004

0.0110 0.0110 0.0103 0.0103 0.0000 45.9126 45.9126 0.0111 0.0000 46.1905 Total 0.0283 0.2686 0.2016 5.0000e-
004

0.0863 0.0110 0.0973 0.0254 0.0103 0.0356 0.0000 45.9126 45.9126 0.0111 0.0000 46.1905 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 12 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.8500e-
003

0.1463 0.0345 5.5000e-
004

0.0149 1.3600e-
003

0.0162 4.0900e-
003

1.3000e-
003

5.3900e-
003

0.0000 54.4574 54.4574 2.6200e-
003

8.6500e-
003

57.1009
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

3.3900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1100e-
003

2.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.9101 0.9101 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.9187
Total 4.2500e-
003

0.1466 0.0379 5.6000e-
004

0.0160 1.3700e-
003

0.0174 4.3800e-
003

1.3100e-
003

5.6900e-
003

0.0000 55.3676 55.3676 2.6500e-
003

8.6800e-
003

0.0265 0.2543 5.0000e-
004

8.1000e-
004

0.0000 45.9125 45.9125 0.0111 0.0000 46.1904
Total 6.1000e-
003

0.0265 0.2543 5.0000e-
004

0.0863 8.1000e-
004

0.0871 0.0254 8.1000e-
004

0.0262 0.0000 45.9125 45.9125 0.0111 0.0000 46.1904
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 13 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.8500e-
003

0.1463 0.0345 5.5000e-
004

0.0149 1.3600e-
003

0.0162 4.0900e-
003

1.3000e-
003

5.3900e-
003

0.0000 54.4574 54.4574 2.6200e-
003

8.6500e-
003

57.1009
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

3.3900e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.1100e-
003

2.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.9101 0.9101 3.0000e-
005

3.0000e-
005

0.9187
Total 4.2500e-
003

0.1466 0.0379 5.6000e-
004

0.0160 1.3700e-
003

0.0174 4.3800e-
003

1.3100e-
003

5.6900e-
003

0.0000 55.3676 55.3676 2.6500e-
003

8.6800e-
003

58.0195
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1044 0.0000 0.1044 0.0353 0.0000 0.0353 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0393 0.3577 0.2933 7.5000e-
004

0.0144 0.0144 0.0134 0.0134 0.0000 68.8694 68.8694 0.0166 0.0000 69.2854 Total 0.0393 0.3577 0.2933 7.5000e-
004

0.1044 0.0144 0.1188 0.0353 0.0134 0.0487 0.0000 68.8694 68.8694 0.0166 0.0000 69.2854 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 14 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.8800e-
003

0.1769 0.0471 7.8000e-
004

0.0223 1.4500e-
003

0.0238 6.1300e-
003

1.3900e-
003

7.5200e-
003

0.0000 78.2109 78.2109 3.9400e-
003

0.0124 82.0159
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.6000e-
004

3.9000e-
004

4.7300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.6600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.6700e-
003

4.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.3300 1.3300 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

1.3419
Total 3.4400e-
003

0.1773 0.0518 7.9000e-
004

0.0240 1.4600e-
003

0.0254 6.5700e-
003

1.4000e-
003

7.9700e-
003

0.0000 79.5409 79.5409 3.9800e-
003

0.0397 0.3814 7.5000e-
004

1.2200e-
003

0.0000 68.8693 68.8693 0.0166 0.0000 69.2853
Total 9.1600e-
003

0.0397 0.3814 7.5000e-
004

0.1044 1.2200e-
003

0.1056 0.0353 1.2200e-
003

0.0365 0.0000 68.8693 68.8693 0.0166 0.0000 69.2853
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 15 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

3.3 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 2.8800e-
003

0.1769 0.0471 7.8000e-
004

0.0223 1.4500e-
003

0.0238 6.1300e-
003

1.3900e-
003

7.5200e-
003

0.0000 78.2109 78.2109 3.9400e-
003

0.0124 82.0159
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.6000e-
004

3.9000e-
004

4.7300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.6600e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.6700e-
003

4.4000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.5000e-
004

0.0000 1.3300 1.3300 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

1.3419
Total 3.4400e-
003

0.1773 0.0518 7.9000e-
004

0.0240 1.4600e-
003

0.0254 6.5700e-
003

1.4000e-
003

7.9700e-
003

0.0000 79.5409 79.5409 3.9800e-
003

0.0125 83.3578
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

5.6700e-
003

5.1000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.8000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

0.0000 2.0719 2.0719 6.7000e-
004

0.0000 2.0887
Total 5.6000e-
004

5.6700e-
003

5.1000e-
003

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.8000e-
004

1.8000e-
004

0.0000 1.7000e-
004

1.7000e-
004

0.0000 2.0719 2.0719 6.7000e-
004

0.0000 2.0887
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 16 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

3.4 Rock Drilling - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

1.8000e-
004

0.0000 6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0495 0.0495 0.0000 0.0000 0.0499
Total 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

1.8000e-
004

0.0000 6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

1.2700e-
003

0.0107 2.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0719 2.0719 6.7000e-
004

0.0000 2.0887
Total 2.9000e-
004

1.2700e-
003

0.0107 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0719 2.0719 6.7000e-
004

0.0000 2.0887
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 17 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

2.0000e-
005

1.8000e-
004

0.0000 6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0495 0.0495 0.0000 0.0000 0.0499
Total 2.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

1.8000e-
004

0.0000 6.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0495 0.0495 0.0000 0.0000 0.0499
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0847 0.0847 0.0797 0.0797 0.0000 280.4837 280.4837 0.0667 0.0000 282.1518 Total 0.1903 1.7406 1.9655 3.2600e-
003

0.0847 0.0847 0.0797 0.0797 0.0000 280.4837 280.4837 0.0667 0.0000 282.1518 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 18 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' '

I I I I
' ' ' '
' '
I I
I
I I I
I I
I
I
' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I

0.0852 3.3600e-
003

0.0885 0.0246 3.2100e-
003

0.0278 0.0000 257.3542 257.3542 7.7800e-
003

0.0373 268.6611
Worker 0.0792 0.0548 0.6691 2.0300e-
003

0.2348 1.2900e-
003

0.2361 0.0624 1.1900e-
003

0.0636 0.0000 188.1383 188.1383 5.5100e-
003

5.1800e-
003
189.8209
Total 0.0943 0.6243 0.8699 4.6600e-
003

0.3200 4.6500e-
003

0.3246 0.0870 4.4000e-
003

0.0914 0.0000 445.4924 445.4924 0.0133 0.0425 458.4820
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0397 0.2704 2.1127 3.2600e-
003

4.9400e-
003

0.0000 280.4834 280.4834 0.0667 0.0000 282.1515
Total 0.0397 0.2704 2.1127 3.2600e-
003

4.9400e-
003

0.0000 280.4834 280.4834 0.0667 0.0000 282.1515
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 19 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' '

I I I I
' ' ' '
' '
I I
I
I I I
I I
I
I
' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I

0.0852 3.3600e-
003

0.0885 0.0246 3.2100e-
003

0.0278 0.0000 257.3542 257.3542 7.7800e-
003

0.0373 268.6611
Worker 0.0792 0.0548 0.6691 2.0300e-
003

0.2348 1.2900e-
003

0.2361 0.0624 1.1900e-
003

0.0636 0.0000 188.1383 188.1383 5.5100e-
003

5.1800e-
003
189.8209
Total 0.0943 0.6243 0.8699 4.6600e-
003

0.3200 4.6500e-
003

0.3246 0.0870 4.4000e-
003

0.0914 0.0000 445.4924 445.4924 0.0133 0.0425 458.4820
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0178 0.0178 0.0167 0.0167 0.0000 67.2362 67.2362 0.0159 0.0000 67.6337 Total 0.0427 0.3899 0.4688 7.8000e-
004

0.0178 0.0178 0.0167 0.0167 0.0000 67.2362 67.2362 0.0159 0.0000 67.6337 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 20 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' '

I I I I
' ' ' '
' '
I I
I
I I I
I I
I
I
' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I

0.1355 0.0470 6.2000e-
004

0.0204 8.1000e-
004

0.0212 5.8900e-
003

7.7000e-
004

6.6700e-
003

0.0000 60.6056 60.6056 1.9100e-
003

8.7800e-
003

63.2699
Worker 0.0179 0.0118 0.1501 4.7000e-
004

0.0563 3.0000e-
004

0.0566 0.0150 2.7000e-
004

0.0152 0.0000 43.9610 43.9610 1.2000e-
003

1.1600e-
003

44.3370
Total 0.0213 0.1474 0.1971 1.0900e-
003

0.0767 1.1100e-
003

0.0778 0.0208 1.0400e-
003

0.0219 0.0000 104.5666 104.5666 3.1100e-
003

9.9400e-
003
107.6069
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 9.5100e-
003

0.0648 0.5064 7.8000e-
004

1.1800e-
003

0.0000 67.2362 67.2362 0.0159 0.0000 67.6337
Total 9.5100e-
003

0.0648 0.5064 7.8000e-
004

1.1800e-
003

0.0000 67.2362 67.2362 0.0159 0.0000 67.6337
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 21 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' ------- ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ., ' ' '

I I I I
' ' ' '
' '
I I
I
I I I
I I
I
I
' ' ' '
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I I I I

0.1355 0.0470 6.2000e-
004

0.0204 8.1000e-
004

0.0212 5.8900e-
003

7.7000e-
004

6.6700e-
003

0.0000 60.6056 60.6056 1.9100e-
003

8.7800e-
003

63.2699
Worker 0.0179 0.0118 0.1501 4.7000e-
004

0.0563 3.0000e-
004

0.0566 0.0150 2.7000e-
004

0.0152 0.0000 43.9610 43.9610 1.2000e-
003

1.1600e-
003

44.3370
Total 0.0213 0.1474 0.1971 1.0900e-
003

0.0767 1.1100e-
003

0.0778 0.0208 1.0400e-
003

0.0219 0.0000 104.5666 104.5666 3.1100e-
003

9.9400e-
003
107.6069
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.0274 0.0407 7.0000e-
005

1.3700e-
003

0.0000 5.7448 5.7448 3.2000e-
004

0.0000 5.7529
Total 1.4129 0.0274 0.0407 7.0000e-
005

1.3700e-
003

0.0000 5.7448 5.7448 3.2000e-
004

0.0000 5.7529
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 22 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

1.8200e-
003

0.0231 7.0000e-
005

8.6600e-
003

5.0000e-
005

8.7100e-
003

2.3000e-
003

4.0000e-
005

2.3400e-
003

0.0000 6.7652 6.7652 1.9000e-
004

1.8000e-
004

6.8230
Total 2.7500e-
003

1.8200e-
003

0.0231 7.0000e-
005

8.6600e-
003

5.0000e-
005

8.7100e-
003

2.3000e-
003

4.0000e-
005

2.3400e-
003

0.0000 6.7652 6.7652 1.9000e-
004

1.8000e-
004

6.8230
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 1.4089 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.7000e-
004

2.9000e-
003

0.0412 7.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.7448 5.7448 3.2000e-
004

0.0000 5.7529
Total 1.4095 2.9000e-
003

0.0412 7.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
005

0.0000 5.7448 5.7448 3.2000e-
004

0.0000 5.7529
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 23 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

1.8200e-
003

0.0231 7.0000e-
005

8.6600e-
003

5.0000e-
005

8.7100e-
003

2.3000e-
003

4.0000e-
005

2.3400e-
003

0.0000 6.7652 6.7652 1.9000e-
004

1.8000e-
004

6.8230
Total 2.7500e-
003

1.8200e-
003

0.0231 7.0000e-
005

8.6600e-
003

5.0000e-
005

8.7100e-
003

2.3000e-
003

4.0000e-
005

2.3400e-
003

0.0000 6.7652 6.7652 1.9000e-
004

1.8000e-
004

6.8230
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 9.8800e-
003

0.0953 0.1463 2.3000e-
004

4.6900e-
003

4.3100e-
003

0.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e-
003

0.0000 20.1885
Paving 2.3600e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0122 0.0953 0.1463 2.3000e-
004

4.6900e-
003

4.3100e-
003

0.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e-
003

0.0000 20.1885
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 24 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

2.5000e-
004

3.2100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.9396 0.9396 3.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.9476
Total 3.8000e-
004

2.5000e-
004

3.2100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.9396 0.9396 3.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.0122 0.1730 2.3000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

0.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e-
003

0.0000 20.1884
Paving 2.3600e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.1600e-
003

0.0122 0.1730 2.3000e-
004

3.7000e-
004

0.0000 20.0265 20.0265 6.4800e-
003

0.0000 20.1884
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 25 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I
I I
I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,-------,--------,--------,-------,-------,-------,--------,-------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,-------,--------,-------"T' - - - - - - -I I I
I

2.5000e-
004

3.2100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.9396 0.9396 3.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.9476
Total 3.8000e-
004

2.5000e-
004

3.2100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2000e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2100e-
003

3.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.3000e-
004

0.0000 0.9396 0.9396 3.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
005

0.9476
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 26 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -.,--------,--------,--------,-------,--------,-------,--------,--------,-------"T"--------t - - - - - - -,--------,--------,--------,-------"T' -------I I
I I
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.6418 1.4529 13.4125 0.0251 3.1109 0.0183 3.1292 0.8302 0.0171 0.8472 0.0000 2,453.968 3 2,453.968
3 0.1971 0.1219 2,495.214
2 Unmitigated 1.6418 1.4529 13.4125 0.0251 3.1109 0.0183 3.1292 0.8302 0.0171 0.8472 0.0000 2,453.968 3 2,453.968
3 0.1971 0.1219 2,495.214
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00
General Office Building 4,676.19 4,676.19 4676.19 7,520,875 7,520,875 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Strip Mall 733.60 733.60 733.60 797,086 797,086
Total 5,409.79 5,409.79 5,409.79 8,317,961 8,317,961
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 General Office Building 5.40 5.40 5.40 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Strip Mall 5.40 5.40 5.40 16.60 64.40 19.00 45 40 15

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 27 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
--------. --.,..-------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------• -. -----,--------.--------,--------.-------.... -----. -., ., ., ., I I
I I
~·····································=--------------~-----------+-----------4------------------------1--------------------------• I I ■ ■ ~·····································=--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------1-------------------------- • I I ■ ■
~-····································•--------------~-----------t-----------4------------------------1-------------------------- • I I - -
I I

I I I I I I
I ■ I I - ■ -
• I I ■ I I - - -~-----------------------r----------~---------T----------y---------r---------r-----------r----------------------r----------------- • I I - I I - - -
• I ' - I I - - -~-----------------------r----------~---------T----------y---------r----•••-•r---•••--•••r--••••--•••r•••--••••-r•--••••--••••--•• • I I ■ I I - - -
• I I - I I - - -~ - - - - - - - - - - • - - - - • - - - - - - -• - - - - • - - - - - T - - - - - - - - - T - • • - • - - • - - T - - - - - - - - ·r - - - - - - - - ·r • - • - - • - - • - - r - - • - - • - • • - - • - - • • - • - - • - r • • - • - - • - - • - - • - - • -. • Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.575453 0.061728 0.171227 0.112384 0.022882 0.006522 0.009800 0.006298 0.000679 0.000623 0.027611 0.000857 0.003936 General Office Building 0.575453 0.061728 0.171227 0.112384 0.022882 0.006522 0.009800 0.006298 0.000679 0.000623 0.027611 0.000857 0.003936 Parking Lot 0.575453 0.061728 0.171227 0.112384 0.022882 0.006522 0.009800 0.006298 0.000679 0.000623 0.027611 0.000857 0.003936 Strip Mall 0.575453 0.061728 0.171227 0.112384 0.022882 0.006522 0.009800 0.006298 0.000679 0.000623 0.027611 0.000857 0.003936

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 773.4108 773.4108 0.0473 5.7600e- 003
776.3082
Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 773.4108 773.4108 0.0473 5.7600e- 003
776.3082
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0299 0.2721 0.2285 1.6300e-
003

0.0207 0.0207 0.0207 0.0207 0.0000 296.1860 296.1860 5.6800e- 003

5.4300e-
003
297.9461
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0299 0.2721 0.2285 1.6300e-
003

0.0207 0.0207 0.0207 0.0207 0.0000 296.1860 296.1860 5.6800e- 003

5.4300e-
003
297.9461

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 28 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I
----------------------- -=- ------- --=---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------~ --------. . I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I I I
------------------------=----------=----------l----------l----------1----------1----------I----------I----------I----------I----------I----------I---------~-------- I I I
•• • • • • I • • • • I • • • • I
···········n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•·······•-------,-------,-------,-------~······· I I I
•• • • • • I • • • • I • • • • I
···········n-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,--------•·······•-------,-------,-------,-------~······· I I I
•• • • • • I • • • • I • • • • I
• • • • • • • • • • • ar------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..------....,..-------• • • • • • • •~------....,..------....,..------....,..-------., • • • • • • • .. ..

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 General Office
Building

5.50959e
+006

0.0297 0.2701 0.2269 1.6200e-
003

0.0205 0.0205 0.0205 0.0205 0.0000 294.0128 294.0128 5.6400e- 003

5.3900e-
003
295.7600
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Strip Mall 40723.7 2.2000e-
004

2.0000e-
003

1.6800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.5000e-
004

0.0000 2.1732 2.1732 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

2.1861
Total 0.0299 0.2721 0.2286 1.6300e-
003

0.0207 0.0207 0.0207 0.0207 0.0000 296.1860 296.1860 5.6800e- 003

5.4300e-
003
297.9461
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 29 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I
I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I, I

5.50959e
+006

0.0297 0.2701 0.2269 1.6200e-
003

0.0205 0.0205 0.0205 0.0205 0.0000 294.0128 294.0128 5.6400e- 003

5.3900e-
003
295.7600
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Strip Mall 40723.7 2.2000e-
004

2.0000e-
003

1.6800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.5000e-
004

0.0000 2.1732 2.1732 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

2.1861
Total 0.0299 0.2721 0.2286 1.6300e-
003

0.0207 0.0207 0.0207 0.0207 0.0000 296.1860 296.1860 5.6800e- 003

5.4300e-
003
297.9461
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 30 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1, I 1, I 1, I
I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I 11 I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• 1, I 1, I 1, I I, I

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator

1.4775e
+006
216.0541 0.0132 1.6100e-
003
216.8635
General Office
Building

3.55937e
+006
520.4831 0.0318 3.8700e-
003
522.4329
Parking Lot 28000 4.0944 2.5000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

4.1098
Strip Mall 224164 32.7793 2.0000e-
003

2.4000e-
004

32.9021
Total 773.4108 0.0473 5.7500e-
003
776.3082
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 31 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied L
L
L
I 11 I I I
•••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L
I 11 I I I
•••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L
I 11 I I I
•••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L L

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator

1.4775e
+006
216.0541 0.0132 1.6100e-
003
216.8635
General Office
Building

3.55937e
+006
520.4831 0.0318 3.8700e-
003
522.4329
Parking Lot 28000 4.0944 2.5000e-
004

3.0000e-
005

4.1098
Strip Mall 224164 32.7793 2.0000e-
003

2.4000e-
004

32.9021
Total 773.4108 0.0473 5.7500e-
003
776.3082
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 32 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied L
L
L
I 11 I I I
•••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L
I 11 I I I
•••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L
I 11 I I I
•••••••••••~--------------,-------,-------T••••••• L
L
L L
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.3105 1.0000e-
004

0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0210 0.0210 5.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0223
Unmitigated 1.3105 1.0000e-
004

0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0210 0.0210 5.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0223

0.1409 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

1.1686 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0210 0.0210 5.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0223
Total 1.3105 1.0000e-
004

0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0210 0.0210 5.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0223
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 33 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
. -----. ----~-------,.-------.--------.--------,.-------.--------.--------.--------.--------,.-------• -------,-------.... -------.--------,.------.... ---. --. . , ., ., ., ' ' ' ■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' '
' ■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
•••••••••••--------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• ' ' ' '

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.1409 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

1.1686 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 9.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
004

0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0210 0.0210 5.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0223
Total 1.3105 1.0000e-
004

0.0107 0.0000 4.0000e-
005

4.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0210 0.0210 5.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.0223
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 34 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied I
I I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I
■ I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I
•••••••••••m-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------,-------~-------•••••••••-------,-------,-------,-------T••••••• I I
I I
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 161.6484 1.6462 0.0398 214.6482
Unmitigated 161.6484 1.6462 0.0398 214.6482

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Office
Building

48.8892 /

29.9644
157.2780 1.6017 0.0387 208.8450
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Strip Mall 1.35849 /

0.832623

4.3703 0.0445 1.0700e-
003

5.8032
Total 161.6483 1.6462 0.0397 214.6482
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 35 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., .,
I I I
■ I I I I
. -----. ----~-------,.-------.--------r --. ----., .,
I,
I, ,.

I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • ,- - - - - - - '81--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I,
I,
,.

I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • ,- - - - - - - '81--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • I,
I, ,. ,.

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Office
Building

48.8892 /

29.9644
157.2780 1.6017 0.0387 208.8450
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Strip Mall 1.35849 /

0.832623

4.3703 0.0445 1.0700e-
003

5.8032
Total 161.6483 1.6462 0.0397 214.6482
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 36 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1,
1,
1,
I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1,
1,
1,
I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1,
1,
1,
I 11 I I I
• • • • • • • • • • • r- - - - - - - .. ,--------,--------,-------T • • • • • • • 1,
1,
1,
I,
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 55.8388 3.3000 0.0000 138.3382
Unmitigated 55.8388 3.3000 0.0000 138.3382
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Enclosed Parking
with Elevator
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
General Office
Building
255.82 51.9292 3.0689 0.0000 128.6523
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Strip Mall 19.26 3.9096 0.2311 0.0000 9.6859
Total 55.8388 3.3000 0.0000 138.3382
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 37 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ., .,
I I I
■ I I I I
. --. -----. -.... ------..-----------------,. -----. -., .,
I,
I,
1,
I 11 I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -,.. - - - - - - .. ,--------,-------,-------"T - - - - - - -I, I,
1,
I 11 I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -,.. - - - - - - .. ,-------,-------,-------"T - - - - - - -I, I,
1,
I 11 I I I
- - - - - - - - - - -,.. - - - - - - .. ,-------,-------,-------"T - - - - - - -I, I,
1,
1,

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AMPage 38 of 39 Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 1,
1,
1,
I 11 I I I
. - - . - - . - - . - r - - - - - - ••-------,--------,-------"T - . - - . - -1, 1,
1,
I 11 I I I
. - - . - - . - - . - r - - - - - - ,.,--------,--------,-------"T - . - - . - - 1,
1,
1,
I 11 I I I
. - - . - - . - - . - r - - - - - - ,.,--------,--------,-------"T - . - - . - - 1,
1,
1,
I,

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 9/17/2021 9:50 AM

Page 39 of 39 ends

Barham MU3 Scenario - San Diego County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

ATTACHMENT C

TEREX 4242SR Rock Crusher Example Cut Sheet

~ TEREX I PEGSQ['
4242SR SPECIFICATION
Above photograph features a 4242SR fitted with the optional side conveyor and magnet

IMPACT CRUSHER
Crusher type:

Feed opening:

Rotor Width:

Rotor Diameter:

Crusher frame:

Rotor:

Blowbars:

Impact aprons:

Drive:

Engine pulley :

Maximum feed size:

Impactor speeds:

Lubrication:

APPLICATIONS
428 Fixed Hammer Impactor.
1067mm x 711 mm_
1066 mm.
1066 mm (Over Hammers).

Fabricated from steel plate and
fitted with replaceable liner plates.

Runs in two heavy-duty spherical
self aligning roller bearings and is
fitted with four reversible and
replaceable fixed blow bars.

Two full size and two half size
high manganese blow bars are
fitted as standard.

Fitted in upper and middle
positions and lined with wear
resistant impact plates.

Through wedge belts with screw
tension adjustment on engine.

Machines built for stock are fitted
with the standard speed pulley
(suitable for quarry applications).

The slower crusher pulley is
supplied loose.
400mm 3 depending on type of
blow bar and material being
processed .

Slow 504 rpm (224mm diameter)
Std. 630 rpm (280mm diameter)
Greased roller bearings, inner
and outer labyrinth seals.

Adjustment:

Maintenance:

Crusher Liners:

Grinding path:

Manual adjustment on upper
and lower aprons with
overload compression
springs on lower apron.

Hydraulic case opening
Fully lined internally with
abrasion resistant steel.

Optional grinding path with
manual adjustment and
overload compression
springs suitable for certain
quarry applications.

This plant is designed for both demolition and quarrying applications. When fitted with manganese blow bars the crusher will tolerate small quantities of steel reinforcing bar in the feed. However , the machine is not designed to accept large pieces of steel or other uncrushable objects, and the feed material should be assessed / inspected for suitability prior to use. It is vitally important that large pieces of steel or similar uncrushable objects are not allowed to enter the crushing chamber as severe damage and injury may occur.

When High Chrome bars are fitted , no steel should be allowed to enter the chamber, the machine should only be used on quarrv applications, or clean materials such as asphalt. 7 l
I
_J
HOPPER
Hopper type:

Hopper length:

Hopper width:

Hopper capacity :

Hopper body:

Fixed Hopper.
4m.

2.1m.

Up to 3.8m
3 gross depending on
method of feed.

Hardox wear resistant steel
plate with suitably braced steel
sections.

VIBRATING GRIZZLY FEEDER
Type:

Vibrating unit:

Length:

Width:

Pan:

Drive:

Grizzly:

U nderscreen:

Control:

Spring mounted vibrating pan.

Twin heavy-duty cast eccentric
shafts running in spherical roller
bearings, gear coupled at drive
end.

3.8m.

1.08m.
12mm thick abrasion resistant steel
bottom plate is included in the
welded construction .

Flange mounted hydraulic motor

2.16m long double section of
welded tapered finger bars at
50mm spaces fabricated in 20mm
thick abrasion resistant steel.

Removable rubber blanking mat
fitted as standard. This can be
substituted for various aperture
wire meshes.

Variable speed control through a
proportional flow control valve.

PLANT CHUTEWORK
Impactor feed chute: Fabricated in 10mm mild steel
plate with full width single strand
chain curtain and rubber curtain .

Liners are fitted at wear points.

Grizzly fines chute: Chutework fabricated in 6mm
mild steel plate is provided with
two-way flapdoor. Material
passing over the blanking mat is
discharged to the main product
conveyor via the bypass chute.

ON PLANT PRODUCT CONVEYOR
CONVEYOR 1
Conveyor type:

Belt type:

Belt width :

Drive:

Feedboot:

Control:

Troughed belt conveyor with
fixed tail end.

Ripstop EPS00/3 with 5mm
top and 2mm bottom heavy
duty rubber covers.
1m.

Direct drive hydraulic motor
Fabricated in mild steel plate
with abrasion resistant steel
liners.

Fixed speed.

TOP DECK SIDE TRANSFER CONVEYOR
CONVEYOR2
Conveyor type :

Belt type:

Conveyor:

Width:

Drive:

Lubrication:

Plain belt.

EP400/2 with 5mm top and

1.5mm bottom rubber covers. A
vulcanised joint is included.

Transfers material from the top
deck of the sizing screen to the
re-circulating conveyor.
500mm.

Direct drive hydraulic motor.

Grease nipples located on
bearing housing at head and
tailshaft.

Skirting:

Belt covers:

Impact cradle:

Lubrication:

Fully skirted wear resista nt
rubber sealing along the
conveyor length.

Canvas type removable dust
covers are fitted at the head
end.

This is provided beneath the
belt immediately below the
impactor outlet.

Grease nipples located on
bearing housings at tailshaft .

RE-CIRCULATING CONVEYOR
CONVEYOR3
Conveyor type:

Belt type:

Conveyor:

Width:

Drive:

Lubrication:

Chevron type !roughed belt.

EP315/2 with 3mm top and 1mm
bottom rubber covers, 35mm high
cleats and a vulcanised joint.

Returns oversize material
transferred from the top deck
back to the impactor for re
crushing. This conveyor can be
slewed to enable oversize
material to be stockpiled at the
side of the plant.
500mm.

Direct drive hydraulic motor
Grease nipples located on
bearing housing for tailshaft.

Remote grease nipples for head
drum.

FINES PRODUCT CONVEYOR
CONVEYOR4
Conveyor type:

Belt type:

Position:

Width:

Discharge Height:

Drive:

Lubrication:

Control:

Plain troughed belt
EP400/2 with 5mm top and

1.5mm bottom rubber covers. A
vulcanised joint is included.

Mounted beneath the sizing
screen.

1.4m.

2.93m.

Direct drive hydraulic motor.

Grease nipples located on
bearing housing at head and
tailshaft .

Fixed Speed.

BOTTOM DECK SIDE TRANSFER CONVEYOR
CONVEYOR5
Conveyor type:

Belt type:

Conveyor :

Width:

Drive:

Lubrication:

Plain belt.

EP400/2 with 5mm top and 1.5mm
bottom rubber covers. A vulcanised
joint is included.

Transfers material from the bottom
deck of the sizing screen to the
optional plant mounted stockpiling
conveyor or the re-circulating
conveyor when in position.
500mm.

Direct drive hydraulic motor.

Grease nipples located on bearing
housing at head and tailshaft.

STOCKPILING CONVEYOR
CONVEYOR 6 (Optional extra)
Conveyor type :

Belt type:

Width:

Drive:

SIZING SCREEN
Type:

Size:

Position:

Drive:

Top deck:

Bottom deck:

Control:

Lubrication:

Access:

POWERPACK
Powerpack type:

Performance:

Engine:

Fuel tank capacity:

CLUTCH
Clutch type:

Chevron type troughed belt Lubrication:

EP315/2 with 3mm top and 1mm
bottom rubber covers, 35mm high
cleats and a vulcanised joint.
500mm. Conveyor :

Direct drive hydraulic motor.

Double deck vibrating screen
(Four bearing type)
1525 X 3350.

Mounted beneath the impactor
product conveyor.

Hydraulic drive.
45mm aperture fitted as
standard
Optional mesh.

Fixed speed. (1100 rpm)
Four grease nipples.

Fines conveyor and screen can
be lowered for maintenance.

Caterpillar C-9.
309 HP (230kW) at 1800 rpm at
sea level.

Six cylinders, four stroke, direct
Injection.
463 Litres.

Manually operated twin disc
clutch.

DUST SUPPRESSION SPRAYS
Sprays bars with atomiser nozzles are mounted over the
impactor discharge point and the fines product conveyor head piped to an inlet manifold for client's pressured
water supply.

Type:

Inlet:

Pressure required:

Water supply:

Frost protection:

Pump:

Clean water multi atomising
nozzles.

Single Point.

2.8 bar (42 psi).
7 litres per minute.

Via system drain valves.

Opt:onai extra.

Grease nipples located on
bearing housing at tailshaft.

Remote grease nipples for
head drum.

Stockp iles material
transferred from the bottom
deck side transfer conveyor
to the side of the plant.

CRAWLER TRACKS
Type:

Pitch:

Longitudinal centres:

Track width:

Climbing grade:

High speed:

Slow speed:

Drive:

Track tensioning:

GUARDS
Heavy-duty tracks fitted as
standard.
160mm.
3800mm .
400 mm.
29• maximum.

0.8 km/hr.

0.322 km/hr.

Hydraulic integral motors
Hydraulic adjuster, grease
tension.

Wire mesh or sheet metal guards are provided for all
drives, flywheels, pulleys & couplings.

The guards provid ed are designed and manufactured to
CE & ANSI standards.

PLATFORMS
A steel grid maintenance platform is provided on one
side of the feeder and impactor fitted with double row
handrails and access ladders. Platforms are also
included to gain access to the rear of the crusher and
the powerpack.

TOOLBOX
A plant mounted lockable toolbox is provided containing the slower speed pulley, operators manual, impactor
stops, spanner, door open locking pins, screen mesh
tensioning hoses, blow bar ejector hoses and a grease
gun.
"T&.."T&..-1'\. -• .__II •-"' I 1'-'1~

CHASSIS
Heavy duty steel fabricated I section of welded
construction.

PLC CONTROLS
A PLC control system is fitted onto the plant to operate the following items: -
• Feeder (Start/Stop/Speed).
• Optional Dirt Conveyor (Start/Stop).
(Also operates Re-Circulating, stockpiling and side
transfer conveyors)
• Product Conveyor (Start/Stop).
• Screen and fines conveyor (Start/Stop).

SET UP CONTROLS
Controls are fitted onto the plant to operate the following items: -
• Side chute (Raise/Lower).
• Screen/Fines Conveyor (Raise/Lower).
• Recirculating Conveyor (Raise/Lower).
• Dirt Conveyor (Raise/Lower)

UMBILICAL CONTROL
An umbilical control unit is also supplied with the plant.

This is fitted with controls for the track motion, feeder stop, start and a stop button for the plant.

OPTIONAL EXTRAS
(For prices refer to your dealer)
• High Chrome hammers (only for use when no steel
in feed).
• Single idler belt weigher with integrator and speed
sensing wheel fitted to fines conveyor.
• 500mm wide stockpiling conveyor from the bottom
oversize transfer conveyor.
• Four full size hammers in lieu of two full and two half hammers.
• Re-fuelling pump kit.
• Radio remote control.
• Overband magnetic separator
• Side/dirt conveyor.

REMOTE CONTROL (OPTIONAL EXTRA)
This option will control the tracking function and also provides stop and start controls for the vibrating grizzly feeder, together with a stop button for the plant. This facility is only available in certain countries where
type approval has been obtained. For a full list of
countries, please consult TP or your dealer.

ON PLANT DIRT/SIDE CONVEYOR
{OPTIONAL EXTRA) CONVEYOR DC
Conveyor type:

Width:

Discharge height:

Drive:

Lubrication:

Skirts:

Position:

Plain troughed belt, hydraulic
folding for transport .
600mm.

2.0m.

Direct drive hydraulic motor.

Grease nipples located on
bearing housing at head and
tailshaft. Remote greasing at
tail drum.

Full length.

Mounted to discharge on near
side of plant.
• Wire meshes for feeder underscreen to
separate scalpings at 10mm, 20mm, 30mm,
40mm or 50mm. The optional dirt conveyor
must be fitted .
• Grinding path (not suitable for demolition
applications) fitted in the lower position and
lined with wear resistant impact plates on the
upper section, and reversible manganese
impact bars on the lower section. When fitted
greater control of the product size is achieved
together with improved product shape.

RECOMMENDED OPTIONAL EXTRAS
• Engine fire extinguisher system.
• Hydraulic driven water pump assembly to
provide a pressurised water supply to the dust
suppression sprays.

MAGNET
(OPTIONAL EXTRA)
Magnet Type:

Magnet Width:

Magnet length:

Drive:

Control:

Discharge chute:

Power:

Suspended self-cleaning
overband, fitted with endless
belt.
750mm.
1000mm.

Hydraulic Motor.

Pre-set variable speed.

Via stainless steel shedder
plate.
570 Gauss at 200mm.
450 Gauss at 250mm.

PLANT DIAGRAM
E E E E r+- N
N J
0 J J fYl
:E
:E
U)
tJ1
0 N

GENERAL
3800mm
2819tttm
11191t11tt 13111t11tt
25601t11tt

TRACK WIDTH
TEREX I Pegson equipment complies with CE requirements. 16361mm

APPROXIMATE OVERALL PLANT WEIGHTS
& DIMENSIONS
Operating Length:

Operating Height:

Transport Length:

Transport Width:

Transport Height:

Total plant weight:

PAINTING
16361 mm
4027 mm
16361 mm
3090 mm
3442 mm
44500 Kg
The plant is finish painted RAL 5015 Blue. The tracks
and handrails are painted RAL 7012 Grey.

The plant is designe d to operate between ambient temperatures of between -10c and 40c at altitudes up to 1000 meters above sea level. For applications outside this range please consult with Terex Pegson Limited.

Above line drawings feature a 4242SR with optional magnet and side conveyor .

Please consult TEREX I Pegson if you have any other specific requirements in respect of guarding, noise or vibration levels, dust emissions , or any other factors relevant to health and safety measures or environmental protection needs. On receipt of specific requests, we will endeavour to ascertai n the need for additional equipment and, if appropriate, quote extra to contract prices. Every endeavour will be made to supply equipment as specified, but we reserve the right, where necessary, to amend the specifica tions without prior notice as we operate a policy of continua l product development. It is the importers responsibility to check that all equipment supplied complies with local legislation . 4242SR Specification 4242SR/204.

ATTACHMENT D

EMFAC – VMT per Trip Calculation
EMFAC2014 (v1.0.7) Emission Rates
Region Type: County
Region: San Diego
Calendar Year: 2025
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 Categories
Units: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips and DIURN Region CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Trips San Diego 2025 HHDT Aggregated Aggregated GAS 161.1216337 21202.37807 3 223.721647 San Diego 2025 HHDT Aggregated Aggregated DSL 15341.84567 2103842.221 0 San Diego 2025 LDA Aggregated Aggregated GAS 1430879.21 47587916.84 906 2515.432 San Diego 2025 LDA Aggregated Aggregated DSL 18230.05635 610522.5588 11 4299.8171 San Diego 2025 LDA Aggregated Aggregated ELEC 102949.8741 4362999.303 6 68758.3291 San Diego 2025 LDT1 Aggregated Aggregated GAS 110056.6214 3351787.675 6 65740.3764 San Diego 2025 LDT1 Aggregated Aggregated DSL 135.5653413 2803.107134 6 58.3286144 San Diego 2025 LDT1 Aggregated Aggregated ELEC 41.86046771 1338.281949 253.6785286 San Diego 2025 LDT2 Aggregated Aggregated GAS 445728.9448 15377108.99 2 820576.047 San Diego 2025 LDT2 Aggregated Aggregated DSL 944.5915358 33384.93915 6 012.222933 San Diego 2025 LHDT1 Aggregated Aggregated GAS 17137.47188 468069.7958 255322.7962 San Diego 2025 LHDT1 Aggregated Aggregated DSL 23103.06152 724642.3549 290607.4503 San Diego 2025 LHDT2 Aggregated Aggregated GAS 4048.832368 139572.0706 60321.56952 San Diego 2025 LHDT2 Aggregated Aggregated DSL 8965.43705 322602.574 11 2773.9196 San Diego 2025 MCY Aggregated Aggregated GAS 70674.39783 501031.3352 14 1334.6608 San Diego 2025 MDV Aggregated Aggregated GAS 267677.4564 8534402.663 16 65093.779 San Diego 2025 MDV Aggregated Aggregated DSL 5742.887036 206955.8564 36 633.47691 San Diego 2025 MH Aggregated Aggregated GAS 8633.503985 64191.89208 863 .6957387 San Diego 2025 MH Aggregated Aggregated DSL 2309.531209 17748.26353 230 .9531209 San Diego 2025 MHDT Aggregated Aggregated GAS 3092.563169 161145.5943 6 1876.00388 San Diego 2025 MHDT Aggregated Aggregated DSL 25605.17262 1301919.202 0 San Diego 2025 OBUS Aggregated Aggregated GAS 1716.976671 92464.33544 3 4353.26924 San Diego 2025 OBUS Aggregated Aggregated DSL 935.0309742 73876.47022 0 San Diego 2025 SBUS Aggregated Aggregated GAS 438.5086625 19991.26012 1 754.03465 San Diego 2025 SBUS Aggregated Aggregated DSL 1213.170137 45957.63464 0 San Diego 2025 UBUS Aggregated Aggregated GAS 472.4052031 63912.54677 1 889.620812 San Diego 2025 UBUS Aggregated Aggregated DSL 690.1969245 93377.97918 2 760.787698 Total 86284768.12 16007853.97
Total VMT/Trip 5.390152126

San Marcos City CouncilMay 10, 2022

San Marcos City Council
May 10, 2022