Attachment H - AppendixD-CAP-Checklist — San Marcos City Council, July 12, 2022 (part 1 of 2)

Clima te Action Plan Consistency Review Checklist
Project #________
Development Services | 1 Civic Center Drive | San Marcos, CA 92069 | (760) 744-1050 | www.san-marcos.net

CLIMATE ACTION PLAN CONSISTENCY REVIEW CHECKLIST

INTRODUCTION
The City of San Marcos (City) adopted an updated Climate Action Plan (CAP) in December, 2020. The CAP outlines strategies and measures that the City will undertake to achieve its proportional share of State greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction targets. The purpose of the CAP Consistency Checklist (Checklist), in conjunction with the CAP, is to provide a streamlined review process for all proposed development projects that are subject to discretionary review and/or trigger environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Analysis of GHG emissions and potential climate change impacts from new development is required under CEQA. The City’s CAP is a qualified greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction plan in accordance with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15064(h)(3), 15130(d), and 15183(b), a project’s incremental contribution to a cumulative GHG emissions effect may be determined not to be cumulatively considerable if it complies with the requirements of a CAP.

The purpose of this Checklist is to implement GHG reduction measures from the CAP that apply to new discretionary development projects. New development would demonstrate consistency with relevant CAP strategies and would not conflict with the City’s ability to achieve the identified GHG reduction targets through implementation of applicable measures. Projects that are consistent with the CAP, as determined through the use of this Checklist, may rely on the CAP for the cumulative impact analysis of GHG emissions.

Projects that are not consistent with the CAP must prepare a comprehensive project-specific analysis of GHG emissions, including quantification of existing and projected GHG emissions and incorporation of the measures in this Checklist to the extent feasible. Cumulative GHG impacts would be significant for any project that is not consistent with the CAP.

This Checklist may be updated periodically to incorporate new GHG reduction techniques or to comply with later amendments to the CAP or local, State, or federal law. Comprehensive updates to this Checklist will be coordinated with each CAP update. Administrative updates to the Checklist may occur regularly, as necessary for the purpose of keeping the Checklist up-to-date and implementable. Updates to the CAP Checklist associated with an update to the City’s CAP would also require City Council approval and shall comply with CEQA.

Development Services | 1 Civic Center Drive | San Marcos, CA 92069 | (760) 744-1050 | www.san-marcos.net

APPLICABILITY AND PROCEDURES
This Checklist is required only for discretionary projects1 that are subject to and not exempt from CEQA.

Projects that are exempt from CEQA are deemed to be consistent with the City’s CAP, and no further review is necessary, with the exception of a Class 32 “In-Fill Development Projects” categorical exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332), for which projects are required to demonstrate consistency with the CAP through this Checklist.

General procedures for Checklist compliance and review are described below. Specific guidance is also provided under each of the questions under Steps 1 and 2 of the Checklist.  The City’s Development Services - Planning Division reviews d evelopment applications and makes determinations regarding environmental review requirements under CEQA.  The specific applicable requirements outlined in the Checklist shall be required as condition s of project approval.
 The project must provide written documentation and supporting evidence that demonstrate how the proposed project would implement each applicable Checklist requirement described herein to the satisfaction of the Planning Division.  If a question in the Checklist is deemed not applicable (N/A) to a project, written documentation and evidence supporting that conclusion shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Planning Division. Each Checklist question provides the scenario(s) where checking N/A may be acceptable. If a measure is deemed not a pplicable for reasons other than those outlined in each question, supporting evidence will need to be provided and would be subject to Planning Division approval. A project may be determined to be inconsistent with the CAP if the N/A response is deemed to be not supported by credible evidence.  Development projects requiring discretionary review that cannot demonstrate consistency with the CAP using this Checklist shall prepare a separate, project -level GHG analysis as part of the CEQA document prepared for the project.
1 In this context, a project is any action that meets the definition of a “Project” in Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelin es.

Development Services | 1 Civic Center Drive | San Marcos, CA 92069 | (760) 744-1050 | www.san-marcos.net Application Information
Contact Information
Project No. and Name:

Property Address and APN:

Applicant Name and Co.:

Contact Phone: Contact Email:

Was a consultant retained to complete this checklist? ☐ Yes ☐ No If Yes, complete the following:

Consultant Name: Contact Phone:

Company Name: Contact Emai l:

Project Information

1. What is the size of the project site (acres)?

2. Identify all applicable proposed land uses:
☐ Residential (indicate # of single-family dwelling units):
☐ Residential (indicate # of multi-family dwelling units):
☐ Commercial (indicate total square footage):
☐ Industrial (indicate total square footage):
☐ Other (describe):

3. Provide a des
cription of the project proposed. This description should match the basic project description used for the CEQA document. The description may be attached to the Checklist if there are space constraints.

University District Specific Plan Amendment and SDP
University District Specific Planning Area (APNs attached as Attachment A) Gary Levitt / Urban Villages San Marcos, LLC
(858) 361-8555 [email protected] Jeremy Louden
LDN Consulting
760-473-1253
[email protected]
202 acres
n/a
3,400 units
345,000 s.f. commercial and 1,120,000 s.f. office
n/a
250 hotel rooms, 5,000 s.f. civic use, 850
student elementary school
X
X
X
Please see Attachment B
X
Development Services | 1 Civic Center Drive | San Marcos, CA 92069 | (760) 744-1050 | www.san-marcos.net STEP 1: LAND USE CONSISTENCY
The first step in this section evaluates a project’s GHG emissions consistent with the City’s Guidance to Demonstrating Consistency with the City of San Marcos Climate Action Plan: For Discretionary Projects Subject to CEQA (Guidance Document). New discretionary development projects subject to CEQA review that emit fewer than 500 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) annually would not contribute considerably to cumulative climate change impacts as stated in the City’s Guidance Document, and therefore, would be considered consistent with the CAP and associated emissions projections.

For projects that are subject to CAP consistency review, the next step in determining consistency is to assess the project’s consistency with the growth projections used in the development of the CAP. This section allows the city to determine a project’s consistency with the land use assumptions used in the CAP.

Development Services | 1 Civic Center Drive | San Marcos, CA 92069 | (760) 744-1050 | www.san-marcos.net Step 1: Land Use Consistency
Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation and supporting documentation for your answer) Yes No

1. The size and type of projects listed below would emit fewer than 500 MTCO2e per year.

Based on this threshold, does the proposed project exceed these characteristics?  Single Family Housing: 36 dwelling units
 Multi-Family Housing: 55 dwelling units
 Office: 43,000 square feet
 Commercial Space: 20,000 square feet
 Regional Shopping Center: 18,000 square feet
 Hotel: 37 rooms
 Restaurant (Sit-Down): 6,500 square feet
 Restaurant (Drive-Thru, High Turnover): 2,400 square feet  General Light Industrial: 58,000 square feet
 University: 263 students
 Mixed-Use: See Guidance to Demonstrating Consistency memorandum for methods to estimate mixed-use development thresholds
 Other: For project types not listed in this section the need for GHG analysis and mitigation will be made on a project-specific basis, considering the 500 MTCO2e per year screening threshold.

If “Yes”, pro
ceed to Question 2 of Step 1.

If “No”, in accordance with the City’s CAP screening criteria, the project’s GHG impact is less than significant and is not subject to the measures of the CAP. ☐ ☐

2. Is the proposed project consistent with the City’s ex isting General Plan land use designation?
If “Yes”, proc
eed to Step 2.

If “No”, proceed to Question 3 of Step 1
☐ ☐

3. For projects not consistent with the existing General Plan land use designation, does the project include a General Plan Amendment that would generate GHG emissions equal to or less than estimated emissions generated under the existing designation? If “Yes”, pro
ceed to Step 2 and provide estimated project emissions under both existing and proposed designation(s) for comparison.

If “No”, the project’s GHG impact is potentially significant, and a GHG analysis must be prepared in accordance with the City’s Guidance Document and applicable CEQA guidelines. The project must incorporate each of the measures identified in Step 2 to mitigate cumulative GHG emissions impacts, along with other mitigation measures as necessary based on a project specific GHG analysis.. Proceed and complete a project specific GHG analysis, and Step 2 of the Checklist.
☐ ☐

X
X
XPlease see Attachment D for the GHG analysis.

Development Services | 1 Civic Center Drive | San Marcos, CA 92069 | (760) 744-1050 | www.san-marcos.net STEP 2: CAP MEASURES CONSISTENCY
The second step of CAP consistency review is to evaluate a project’s consistency with the applicable strategies and measures of the CAP. Each Checklist item is associated with a specific GHG reduction measure in the City’s CAP. “N/A” should only be checked based on the direction provided in each Checklist Item question. All projects for which the measure is applicable must demonstrate that they would implement measures consistent with the Checklist Item, or fully substantiate how the item would be infeasible for project implementation. “N/A” responses are subject to Planning Division review and approval. If “No” is provided as a response to a question, the project would be determined to be inconsistent with the CAP and result in a significant GHG impact.

Development Services | 1 Civic Center Drive | San Marcos, CA 92069 | (760) 744-1050 | www.san-marcos.net Step 2: CAP Measures Consistency
Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation for your answer. Please use additional sheets if necessary)
Yes No N/A
Project Design

1. Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (Measure T-2)
Multi-Family Residential and Non-Residential: Will the project install electric vehicle charging stations (Level 2 or better) in at least five percent of the total parking spaces provided on-site? Check “N/A”
if the project is a single-family residential project or would not provide any parking.
☐ ☐ ☐

2. Bicycle Infrastructure (Measure T-8)
Residential and Non-Residential Projects: If the following conditions are met, would the project pay its fair-share contribution to bicycle infrastructure improvements?
☐ Intersection or roadway segment improvements are
proposed as part of the project and,
☐ The City’s General Plan Mobility Element identifies
bicycle infrastructure improvements at any
intersection(s) or roadway segment(s) that would be
improved as part of the project.

Check “N/A”
if the conditions above would not be met.
☐ ☐ ☐
X
Please substantiate how the project satisfies question 2:

Per the Mobility Element, E. Barham Drive and Twin Oaks Valley Road in the project vicinity are identified as future Class I bicycle facilities . Please see Attachment C for a description of how the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and SDP would comply with Measures T-8.

Please substantiate how the project satisfies question 1:

Please see Attachment C for a description of how the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and SDP will comply with Measure T-2.

X
Development Services | 1 Civic Center Drive | San Marcos, CA 92069 | (760) 744-1050 | www.san-marcos.net Step 2: CAP Measures Consistency
Checklist Item
(Check the appropriate box and provide an explanation for your answer. Please use additional sheets if necessary)
Yes No N/A

3. Transportation Demand Management (Measure T-9)
Multi-Family Residential and Non-Residential: Will the project develop and implement a TDM plan that includes, at a minimum, all of the TDM strategies listed below?
☐ Provide discounted monthly transit pass or provide at least 25 percent transit fare subsidy to
residents/employees.
☐ Provide designated car-share, carpool, vanpool, and/or park-and-ride parking spaces.
2 ☐ Provide pedes
trian connections between all internal
uses and to all existing or planned external streets
around the project site(s).
☐ Provide secure bicycle parking spaces or bicycle racks, showers, and clothes lockers.
☐ Encourage telecommuting for employees (allow one
telecommute day per week or compressed work weeks)
or provide a telecommute work center with common
office space and equipment available to residents.
-or-
Would the project implement and monitor for four (4) years a TDM program that demonstrates an alternative transportation (i.e. carpool, public transit, bicycle, walk, telecommute) mode share of at least 29 percent 3 for all residents?
Check “N/A”
if the project is a single-family residential project or is not subject to the City’s TDM Ordinance.
☐ ☐ ☐
2 The designated number of car-share, carpool, vanpool, and/or park -and-ride parking spaces provided at a rate equal to or greater than CALGreen minimum requirements.
3 Measure T -10 requires projects to increase alternative mode share by seven percent. The baseline mode share for a lternative transportation (i.e. carpool, public transit, bicycle, walk, and telecommute) is 22 percent based on 2010 Census Data.

Please state which measure option the project for which the project would comply and substantiate how the project satisfies question 3:

Please
see Attachment C for a description of how the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and SDP will comply with Measure T-9.

4. Reduce Parking Near Transit (Measure T-12)
Multi-Family Residential: If located within a half-mile of a major transit stop4, would the project provide at least 27 percent fewer parking spaces than required for the same use based on the City’s municipal code parking requirements?
Check “N/A” if th
e project is a single-family residential or non-residential project.

X ☐ ☐

5. Water Heaters (Measure E-1)
Residential: Will the project install one of, or a combination of, the following water heater types in place of natural gas water heaters?
☐ Electric heat pump water heater
☐ Instantaneous electric water heater
☐ Electric tank
☐ Solar water heater with heat pump water heater backup ☐ Solar water heater with electric tank backup
Check “N/A” if th
e project is a non-residential project.
☐ ☐ ☐
4 Major transit stop is defined as a bus or light -rail station with fixed service and 10 -minute minimum headways during peak hours.

Project applicants should confirm with City staff if the project site would fall within this proximity tot a major transit stop.

X
Please substantiate how the project satisfies question 5:

Please see Attachment C for a description of how the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and SDP will comply with Measure E-1.

Please see Attachment C for a description of how the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and SDP will comply with Measure T-12.

6. Photovoltaic Installation (Measure E-2)
Non-Residential: Will the project install photovoltaic systems with a minimum capacity of two watts per square foot of gross floor area?
Check “N/A” if the pro
ject is a residential project or if installation of on- site photovoltaic would be infeasible.
☐ ☐ ☐

7. Landscaping Water Use (Measure W-1)
Residential and Non-Residential: Will the project comply with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance?5
Check “N/A” if the pro
ject is not proposing any landscaping or is not
subject to the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. ☐ ☐ ☐
5 City of San Marcos Landscape Manual: https://www.san -marcos.net/home/showdocument?id=13984 Please substantiate how the project satisfies question 7:

Please see Attachment C for a description of how the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and SDP will comply with Measure W-1.

X
Please substantiate how the project satisfies question 6:

Please see Attachment C for a description of how the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and SDP will comply with Measure E-2.

8. Urban Tree Canopy (Measure C-2)
Single-Family Residential: Will the project plant a minimum of one tree per single-family residential unit?
-or-
Multi-Family Residential and Non-Residential: If the project is providing more than 10 parking spaces, will the project plant at least one tree per five parking spaces provided?
Check “N/A”
if planting the required number of trees on-site would be infeasible.
☐ ☐
Please substantiate how the project satisfies question 8:

Please see Attachment C for a description of how the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and SDP will comply with Measure C-2.
☐ X
Detailed List of APNs within the University District Specific Plan Amendment Boundary 06/09/21 221-080 221-100 221-100 221-142 220-170 220-181 220-190 221-070 220-201 220-202 -05 -02 -09 -19 -36 -35 -52 -19 -90 -12
-06 -03 -10 -20 -46 -36 -20 -13
-07 -04 -12 -22 -37 -14
-08 -09 -16 -23 -38 -15
-15 -10 -17 -24 -39 -16
-16 -14 -18 -25 -40 -17
-17 -16 -22 -45 -19
-18 -21 -23 -20
-20 -22 -24 -21
-22 -24 -26 -24
-23 -32 -27 -26
-24 -33 -28 -27
-25 -35 -29 -28
-26 -37 -32 -29
-27 -38 -33 -30
-28 -40 -39 -31
-29 -45 -40 -32
-46 -41 -33
-47 -42 -34
-48 -44 -35
-54 -46 -37
-55 -50 -38
-56 -51 -41
-58 -52 -43
-59 -53 -45
-60 -54 -47
-61 -55 -48
-62 -56 -49
-63 -57 -50
-64 -58 -51
-65 -59 -52
-66 -63 -57
-69 -58
-70 -59
-72 -60
-73 -61
-74 -62
-76 -63
-77 -65
-78 -66
-79 -67
-68
-69
-70
13003.77
SPA APN List

Page 1 of 1 ends

Attachment A
1 Attachment B
Project Description
S
pecific Plan Amendment - University District Specific Plan The proposed UDSP Amendment would decrease the overall development yield within the planning area. Table 1 presents the currently approved development yield compared with the proposed project.

Table 1. Land Use Statistical Summary
Land Use Description Current UDSP
Approx. 194 acres
Proposed Project
(Amended UDSP)
Approx. 203 acres
Change
Mixed-Use Residential 2,600 units 2,600 units No change Student Housing 800 units 800 units No change
Hotel 450 rooms 250 rooms -200 rooms
General Office 638,000 s.f. 920,000 s.f. +282,000 s.f.

Medical Office 300,000 s.f. 200,000 s.f. -100,000 s.f.

Mixed Use Retail/Commercial 700,000 s.f. 345,000 s.f. -355,000 s.f.

Community/Civic 5,000 s.f. 5,000 s.f. No change
K-6 Elementary School 850 students 850 students No change Parks and Urban Opens Space 25.00 acres 27.13 acres to

31.13 acres(1)
+2.13 acres to
+6.13 acres
Urban Trails/Paths 1.38 acres 1.38 acres No change
Preserved Open Space (Habitat) 15.10 acres 15.10 acres No change Public Streets 25.00 acres 22.00 acres -3.00 acres
Notes:
(1) The Park and Urban Space land use will be a minimum of 27.13 acres under the amended UDSP. This amount could increase to 31.13 acres under one of the scenarios if a K-6 elementary school is not constructed within the UDSP planning area. Therefore, the increase in park and urban space could range from 2.13 acres to 6.13 acres compared to the currently adopted UDSP.
(2) The UDSP and the UDSPA would both allow for a K-6 elementary school on an 8-acre site in the Residential Neighborhood. If the school is constructed, there will be no decrease in the allowed number of Mixed-Use Residential dwelling units within the UDSP. Should San Marcos Unified School District decide that the school is not needed, there are two alternatives for the 8-acre site. The first alternative is that four acres would be Parks and Urban Open Space and become an extension of Knoll Park and the remaining four acres would be Mixed-Use Residential. The second option is that the entire 8-acres would revert to Mixed-Use Residential.

A
s shown in Table 1, the total number of residential units within the UDSP would remain at 3,400 units with 2,600 units for multi-family residential and 800 units as student housing. The number of hotel rooms would decrease by 200 rooms. Medical office uses would decrease by 100,000 s.f., mixed use retail/commercial uses would decrease by 355,000 s.f. and public streets would decrease by 3 acres. The general office use would increase by 282,000 s.f. and the amount of parks and urban open space would increase up to 6.13 acres, depending on which alternative is implemented if a K-6 school is not built. 2 APN 220-201-90-00 (Zirpolo) and APN 220-202-18-00 (NCTD) The project applicant is proposing to remove two parcels, totaling approximately 8 acres, from the Heart of the City Specific Plan (HOCSP) and add them to the UDSP.

The 6.3-acre parcel (APN 220-201-90-00), known as the Zirpolo property, is currently designated as Business Park in the HOCSP. As part of the proposed project this parcel would be removed from the HOCSP and be added to the UDSP. It would be designated as Office/Commercial within the UDSP.

APN 220-202-18-00 is 1.7 acres and located just east of the SPRINTER rail line. This property is owned by the North County Transit District (NCTD) and is currently designated as Business Park in the HOCSP. As part of the project this parcel would be removed from the HOCSP and be added to the UDSP for connectivity purposes. This parcel serves as an emergency access and maintain access point for the rail line. It would be designated as Office/Commercial within the UDSP with a Railroad ROW overlay.

Any development on these two parcels would be part of the overall UDSP development yield presented in Table 1.

Site Development Permit
A Site Development Plan (SDP21-0003) for Blocks 2 and J is proposed. The SDP covers 9.46 acres and covers Block 2 and Block J within the UDSP (APNs 220-202-49,50,51,52,57,65,67,68,69 and 221- 110- 46,55,56,57,81,82,83,70). The SDP includes two phases, described below. Phase A (Block 2) is located at the northwest corner of North City Drive and Campus Way. Phase B (Block J) is located at the southwest corner of East Carmel Street and Campus Way.

The two SDP phases include the following:
• Phase A (Block 2) - proposes construction of a new 839,000 s.f. (gross floor area) /786,000 s.f. (occupiable space) 12-story mixed use development with ground floor retail, residential, amenity support spaces with residential units and amenity spaces on floors above. Phase A includes 482 units. The building height would be 150’ 2”.

• Phase B (Block J) – proposes construction of a new 350,000 s.f. 5- story mixed use development with ground floor retail, residential, amenity support spaces with residential units and amenity spaces on floors above. Phase B includes 56 units. The building height would be 72 feet.

1 Attachment C
CAP Measures Compliance Matrix
CAP Measure Specific Plan Compliance SDP21-0002
(Phase A and B) Compliance
Electric Vehicle Charging Stations (Measure T-2)

Multi-Family Residential and Non-Residential: Will the
project install electric vehicle charging stations (Level 2 or better) in at least five percent of the total parking spaces provided on-site?
The Environmental Sustainability Policies
(Section II.4.6 of the University District Specific
Plan) includes the requirement that all future
development within the UDSP shall adhere to
current applicable CAP Measures, or equivalent
or stronger measures, at the time a site
development plan is proposed. The current CAP
Measure T-2 requires the installation of electric
vehicle charging stations (Level 2 or better) in at
least five percent of the total parking spaces
provided on-site. Implementation of this
measure would occur at the time a
development project is proposed.

Between the Phase A and B of the SDP there
will be a combined 971 parking spaces,
which would require 49 EV charging station
assuming 5% of the spaces have a charging
station.

The project applicant is targeting to exceed
the requirements of Measures T-2 for the
SDP. The project will install EV charging
stations (Level 2 or better) in 10% of the
parking spaces. Additionally, the parking
garages will have conduit to accommodate
EV charging in all spaces in the future.

Bicycle Infrastructure (Measure T-8)

If the following conditions are met, would the project
pay its fair-share contribution to bicycle infrastructure improvements?
• Intersection or roadway segment
improvements are proposed as part of the
project and,
• The City’s General Plan Mobility Element
identifies bicycle infrastructure improvements
at any intersection(s) or roadway segment(s)
that would be improved as part of the project.

The Environmental Sustainability Policies
(Section II.4.6 of the University District Specific
Plan) includes the requirement that all future
development within the UDSP shall adhere to
current applicable CAP Measures, or equivalent
or stronger measures, at the time a site
development plan is proposed. The current CAP
Measure T-8 requires fair-share contribution to
bicycle infrastructure improvements be made if
intersection or roadway improvements are
proposed as part of the project, and the City’s
General Plan Mobility Element identifies bicycle
infrastructure improvements at any
intersection(s) or roadway segment(s) that
would be improved as part of the project.

Implementation of this measure would occur at
Not Applicable.

Development under the SDP does not meet
the conditions identified in Measures T-8.

Development under the SDP will not
improve any intersections or roadway
segments where the City’s General Plan
Mobility Element identifies bicycle
infrastructure improvements that would be
improved as part of the project.
2 CAP Measure Specific Plan Compliance SDP21-0002
(Phase A and B) Compliance
the time a development project is proposed.

Transportation Demand Management (Measure T-9)

Multi-Family Residential and Non-Residential: Will the
project develop and implement a TDM plan that
includes, at a minimum, all of the TDM strategies listed below?

• Provide discounted monthly transit pass or
provide at least 25 percent transit fare subsidy
to residents/employees.

• Provide designated car-share, carpool,
vanpool, and/or park-and-ride parking
spaces.2

• Provide pedestrian connections between all
internal uses and to all existing or planned
external streets around the project site(s).

• Provide secure bicycle parking spaces or
bicycle racks, showers and clothes lockers

• Encourage telecommuting for employees
(allow one telecommute day per week or
compressed work weeks) or provide a
telecommute work center with common office
space and equipment available to residents.

Would the project implement and monitor for four (4)
years a TDM program that demonstrates an
The Environmental Sustainability Policies
(Section II.4.6 of the University District Specific
Plan) includes the requirement that all future
development within the UDSP shall adhere to
current applicable CAP Measures, or equivalent
or stronger measures, at the time a site
development plan is proposed. The current CAP
Measure T-9 requires multi-family residential
and non-residential projects to implement
specific TDM measures identified in the CAP
Consistency Checklist or implement and monitor
for four years a TDM program that
demonstrates an alternative transportation
mode share of at least 29 percent for all
residents. Implementation of this measure
would occur at the time a development project
is proposed.

Please see the adjacent response for the
Specific Plan compliance.

The project would comply with this
measures by implementing and monitoring
the TDM program that demonstrates an
alternative mode share of at least 29 percent
for all residents.

3 CAP Measure Specific Plan Compliance SDP21-0002
(Phase A and B) Compliance
alternative transportation (i.e., carpool, public transit, bicycle, walk, telecommute) mode share of at least 29
percent for all residents?
Reduce Parking Near Transit (Measure T-12)

Multi-Family Residential: If located within a half-mile of a major transit stop, would the project provide at
least 27 percent fewer parking spaces than required
for the same use based on the City’s municipal code
parking requirements?
The Environmental Sustainability Policies
(Section II.4.6 of the University District Specific
Plan) includes the requirement that all future
development within the UDSP shall adhere to
current applicable CAP Measures, or equivalent
or stronger measures, at the time a site
development plan is proposed. CAP Measure T-
12 requires reduced parking for multi-family
residential projects that are located within a
half-mile of a major transit stop (27 percent
fewer parking spaces than required based upon
the City’s Municipal Code parking
requirements). Implementation of this measure
would occur at the time a development project
is proposed.

The project proposes multi-family residential
within a half-mile of a major transit stop,
specifically the SPRINTER. The project
consolidates parking through the use of
structured parking and by implementing a
"park once" strategy . The City’s Municipal
Code (Table 20.340-1) identifies minimum
required parking by land use. For multi-
family residential the parking requirement is
Studio (1 space/unit), 1-Bedroom Unit (1.5
spaces/unit), 2-Bedroom Units (2
spaces/unit). Guest parking is also required
at 1 space/3 units. The UDSP identifies a
parking requirement of 1 space/unit,
regardless of unit size.

Given the proposed mix of unit sizes, Phase
A and B would require 1,012 parking spaces
for the multi-family residential per the
Municipal Code. However, per the UDSP,
which requires 1 space per unit, the project
will provide 557 spaces for the multi-family
residential. Therefore, the multi-family
residential parking for the project will be at
least 27 percent fewer parking spaces than
required by the City’s Municipal Code.

Water Heaters (Measure E-1)

Residential: Will the project install one of, or a
The Environmental Sustainability Policies
(Section II.4.6 of the University District Specific
Plan) includes the requirement that all future
The project will use Voltex Hybrid electric
heat pump water heaters in the residential
units. This specification will be added to
4 CAP Measure Specific Plan Compliance SDP21-0002
(Phase A and B) Compliance
combination of, the following water heater types in
place of natural gas water heaters?
• Electric heat pump water heater
• Instantaneous electric water heater
• Electric tank
• Solar water heater with heat pump water
heater backup
• Solar water heater with electric tank backup
development within the UDSP shall adhere to
current applicable CAP Measures, or equivalent
or stronger measures, at the time a site
development plan is proposed. CAP Measure E-
1 requires residential projects to install one, or a
combination of, the following hot water heater
types: electric pump water heater,
instantaneous electric water heater, electric
tank, solar water heaters with heat pump water
heater back up or solar water heater with
electric tank back up. Implementation of this
measure would occur at the time a
development project is proposed.

Sheet IP-002 in the next project deliverable.

Photovoltaic Installation (Measure E-2)

Non-Residential: Will the project install photovoltaic
systems with a minimum capacity of two watts per
square foot of gross floor area?
The Environmental Sustainability Policies
(Section II.4.6 of the University District Specific
Plan) includes the requirement that all future
development within the UDSP shall adhere to
current applicable CAP Measures, or equivalent
or stronger measures, at the time a site
development plan is proposed. CAP Measure E-
2 requires non-residential projects to install
photovoltaic systems with a minimum capacity
of two watts per hour per square foot of gross
floor area. Implementation of this measure
would occur at the time a development project
is proposed.

The combined gross floor area for non-
residential uses in Phases A and B is 306,028
s.f. (includes retail, amenity and support
uses) which would require 612,056 watts
(612 kW) of photovoltaic to meet this
requirement.

The project will install photovoltaic solar
arrays that will generate approximately
250kW.

Because the tower rooftops at Block 2 are
small (relative to the overall size of the
project), it's infeasible to install a system
larger than approximately 250Kw. The
applicant is planning on installing a larger PV
system at Block J to supplement power at
Block 2. The Block J system will be
approximately 750Kw and will be directly
5 CAP Measure Specific Plan Compliance SDP21-0002
(Phase A and B) Compliance
connected to Block 2 underground across
the Paseo.

Landscaping Water Use (Measure W-1)

Residential and Non-Residential: Will the project
comply with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance?
The Environmental Sustainability Policies
(Section II.4.6 of the University District Specific
Plan) includes the requirement that all future
development within the UDSP shall adhere to
current applicable CAP Measures, or equivalent
or stronger measures, at the time a site
development plan is proposed. CAP Measure W-
1 requires that residential and non-residential
projects comply with the City’s Water Efficient
Landscape Ordinance. Implementation of this
measure would occur at the time a
development project is proposed. The
conceptual landscape plan within the UDSP
prioritizes drought-tolerant and native plants.
(Section IV.4 of the UDSP).

Sheet LI101 (Landscape Irrigation Plan)
provides calculations to demonstrate
compliance with the City’s Water Efficient
Landscape Ordinance.

Urban Tree Canopy (Measure C-2)

Single-Family Residential: Will the project plant a
minimum of one tree per single-family residential
unit?

Multi-Family Residential and Non-Residential: If the
project is providing more than 10 parking spaces, will
the project plant at least one tree per five parking
spaces provided?
The Environmental Sustainability Policies
(Section II.4.6 of the University District Specific
Plan) includes the requirement that all future
development within the UDSP shall adhere to
current applicable CAP Measures, or equivalent
or stronger measures, at the time a site
development plan is proposed. CAP Measure C-
2 requires Implementation of this measure
would occur at the time a development project
is proposed.

The SDP does not propose any single family
residential.

A total of 971 parking spaces are proposed
for Phase A and B of the SDP. This will be
structured parking, which results in a smaller
footprint as parking is accommodated
vertically. At a rate of one tree per 5 parking
spaces, this would require 195 trees to be
planted. Per the landscape plans, Phase A
and B, combined, will plant 105 trees. The
project applicant will plant an additional 90
trees within the UDSP planning area as
future projects come forward.

Project: 21-90 UDSP GHG Report

GREENHOUSE GAS ASSESSMENT
University District Specific Plan Amendment
City of San Marcos, CA
Prepared
for:

City of San Marcos
1 Civic Center Drive
San Marcos, CA 92069
Prepared
By:
42428 Chisolm Trail
Murrieta, California 92562
760-
473-1253
May 13, 2022

ATTACHMENT D
ii
Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ............................. II LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ III LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................................. III ATTACHMENTS ................................................................................................................... .............................. III LIST OF COMMON ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................... ................... IV

1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. .................. 1

1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1

1.2 PROJECT LOCATION ......................................................................................................................................... 2

1.3 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT ................................................................................................................................. 4

2.0 BACKGROUND AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .................................................................................... 5

2.1 UNDERSTANDING CLIMATE CHANGE AND GREENHOUSE GASES ................................................................................ 5

2.2 CLIMATE AND METEOROLOGY ........................................................................................................................... 6

3.0 CLIMATE CHANGE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................... 7

3.1 STATE ........................................................................................................................................................... 7

3.2 LOCAL THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE ............................................................................................................... 17

4.0 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................... 19

4.1 CONSTRUCTION CO2E EMISSIONS CALCULATION METHODOLOGY ........................................................................... 19

4.2 OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS CALCULATION METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 20

5.0 FINDINGS....................................................................................................................... ...................... 22

5.1 PROJECT RELATED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS .................................................................................................... 22

5.2 SPECIFIC PLAN OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ........................................................................................................... 22

5.3 CEQA COMPLIANCE ...................................................................................................................................... 24

6.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................... .................... 26

iii
Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
List of Figures

FIGURE 1-A: PROJECT VICINITY MAP ................................................................................................................... 2 FIGURE 1-B: PROJECT AERIAL .............................................................................................................................. 3

List of Tables

TABLE 1.1: OVERALL UDSPA CHANGES ............................................................................................................... 1 TABLE 4.1: EXPECTED CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT .......................................................................................... 19 TABLE 4.2: SDG&E ENERGY INTENSITY FACTORS ................................................................................................ 20 TABLE 5.1: CUMULATIVE CONSTRUCTION CO2E EMISSIONS SUMMARY (MT) ..................................................... 22 TABLE 5.2: UDSP OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS SUMMARY (MT/YEAR) .................................................................. 23 TABLE 5.3: UDSPA OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS SUMMARY (MT/YEAR) ................................................................ 24

Attachments

CALEEMOD EMISSION MODEL – UDSP ................................................................................................ ............... 28 CALEEMOD EMISSION MODEL – UDSPA ........................................................................................................... 102

iv
Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report

LIST OF COMMON ACRONYMS

Assembly Bill 32 (AB32)
Business as Usual (BAU)
California Air Pollution Control Officers Association’s (CAPCOA) California Air Resource Board (CARB)
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
Cubic Yards (CY)
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Green House Gas (GHG)
International Residential Code (IRC)
Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)
Methane (CH4)
Nitrous Oxide (N2O)
San Diego Air Basin (SDAB)
San Diego Air Pollution Control District (SDAPCD)
Senate Bill 97 (SB97)
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)

1 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project Description

The proposed University District Specific Plan Amendment (UDSPA) proposes changes in the development intensity of several uses within the University District Specific Plan (UDSP) area.

The UDSPA also expands the existing UDSP planning area by approximately 8 acres. The UDSPA calls for adjustments to the existing approved UDSP which was approved in 2014. The UDSPA seeks to modify this area to better align with current market demands. A general land use comparison between the two is shown in Table 1.1.

Table 1.1: Overall UDSPA Changes
Use Current UDSP (UDSP)
Approx. 194 acres
Proposed Project (UDSPA)
Approx. 202 acres
Change
Mixed-use Residential 2,600 units 2,600 units No change Student Housing 800 units 800 units No change
Hotel 450 rooms 250 rooms -200 rooms
General Office 638,000 sf 920,000 sf +282,000 sf
Medical Office 300,000 sf 200,000 sf -100,000 sf
Mixed Use Retail/Commercial 700,000 sf 345,000 sf -355,000 sf Community/Civic 5,000 sf. 5,000 sf -25,000 sf
Parks and Urban Opens Space 25.00 acres 27.13 acres to

31.13 acres (1)
+2.13 acres to
+6.13 acres
K-6 Elementary School (2) 850 students 850 students No change Urban Trails/Paths 1.38 acres 1.38 acres No change
Preserved Open Space (Habitat) 15.10 acres 15.10 acres No change Public Streets 25.00 acre s 22.00 acres - 3.00 acres
Notes:
(1) The Park and Urban Space land use will be a minimum of 27.13 acres under the amended UDSP. This amount could increase to 31.13 acres under one of the scenarios if a K-6 elementary school is not constructed within the UDSP planning area. Therefore, the increase in park and urban space could range from 2.13 acres to 6.13 acres compared to the currently adopted UDSP.
(2) The UDSP and the UDSPA would both allow for a K-6 elementary school on an 8-acre site in the Residential Neighborhood. If the school is constructed, there will be no decrease in the allowed number of Mixed-Use Residential dwelling units within the UDSP. Should San Marcos Unified School District decide that the school is not needed, there are two alternatives for the 8-acre site. The first alternative is that four acres would be Parks and Urban Open Space and become an extension of Knoll Park and the remaining four acres would be Mixed-Use Residential. The second option is that the entire 8-acres would revert to Mixed-Use Residential.

2 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report

1.2 Project Location

The UDSPA is located on the north side of Discovery Street/Barham Drive and south of CA-78 roughly spanning from Discovery Street at Grand Avenue to Barham Drive at Industrial Street.

A project vicinity map is shown in Figure 1-A and an Ariel Map is provide in Figure 1-B.

Figure 1-A: Project Vicinity Map

Source: (Google, 2021)
Project Site

3 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
Figure 1-B: Project Aerial

Project Site
Source: (Google Earth Pro, 2021)

4 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report

1.3 Purpose of this Report

The purpose of this Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Assessment is to analyze the project’s GHG emissions and evaluate its conformance with the City of San Marcos’ Climate Action Plan (CAP). As described in the City’s CAP, there is an existing framework of federal, State, regional, and local policies and regulations that identify GHG reduction requirements within the State. The CAP provides a plan for the City to meet these requirements and achieve local reduction requirements ou tlined in the CAP. In addition, as identified in the CAP, showing consistency with the CAP would also demonstrate that the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact under the California En vironmental Quality Act (CEQA) (City of San Marcos, 2020).

This analysis has been completed in order compare GHG emissions from both the approved UDSP and the proposed project (UDSPA). It should be noted that since the UDSP was originally approved in 2009, much of the mass grading and some of the project development has already occurred. However, for the comparison of the existing UDSP and the proposed UDSPA, none of the development is assumed and would be conservative under CEQA.

5 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report

2.0 BACKGROUND AND EN VIRONMENTAL SETTING

2.1 Understanding Climate Change and Greenhouse Gases

Climate change refers to any significant change in measures of climate, such as temperature, precipitation, or wind patterns, lasting for an extended period of time (decades or longer).

The Earth’s temperature depends on the balance between energy entering and leaving the planet’s system. Many factors, both natura l and human, can cause changes in the Earth’s energy balance, including variations in the sun's energy reaching Earth, changes in the reflectivity of Earth’s atmosphere and surface, and changes in the greenhouse effect, which affects the amount of heat retained by Eart h’s atmosphere. The greenhouse effect is the trapping and build-up of heat in the atmosphere (troposphere) near the Earth’s surface. The greenhouse effect traps heat in the troposphere through a threefold process as follows:

Short-wave radiation emitted by the Sun is absorbed by the Earth, the Earth emits a portion of this energy in the form of long-wave radiation and GHGs in the upper atmosphere absorb this long-wave radiation and emit it into space and toward the Earth.

The greenhouse effect is a natural process that contributes to regulating the Earth’s temperature and creates a pleasant, livable environment on the Earth. Human activities that emit additional GHGs to the atmosphere increase the amount of infrared radiation that gets absorbed before escaping into space, thus enhancing the greenhouse effect and causing the Earth’s surface temperature to rise.

The GHGs typically analyzed in a GHG study are Carbon Dioxide (CO 2), Methane (CH4), and
Nitrous Oxide (N2O) because they are emitted in the greatest quantities from human activities.

A brief description of each GHG follows:

Carbon Dioxide. CO2 is a naturally occurring gas and a by-product of human activities. It is the principal anthropogenic GHG that affects the Earth’s radiative balance. Natural sources of CO2 include, but are not limited to, respiration of bacteria, plants, animals, and fungi; volcanic out-gassing; and decomposition of dead organic matter. Human activities that generate CO 2 are from the combustion of fuels such as coal, oil, natural gas, and wood and changes in land use.

Methane. CH4 is produced through both natural and human activities. CH 4 is a flammable gas and is the main component of natural gas. CH 4 is produced through anaerobic (without oxygen) decomposition of waste in landfills, flooded rice fields, animal digestion, decomposition of animal wastes, production and distribution of natural gas and petroleum, coal production, and incomplete fossil fuel combustion.

6 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
Nitrous Oxide. N2O is produced through natural and human activities, mainly through agricultural activities and natural biological processes, although fuel burning and other processes also create N 2O. Sources of N 2O include soil cultivation practices (microbial processes in soil and water), especially the use of commercial and organic fertilizers, manure management, industrial processes (such as in nitric acid production, nylon production, and fossil-fuel-fired power plants), vehicle emissions, and using N 2O as a propellant (such as in rockets, racecars, and aerosol sprays).

To simplify GHG calculations, both CH 4 and N 2O are converted to an equivalent amount of carbon dioxide, or CO 2e. CO2e is calculated by multiplying the calculated levels of CH 4 and N2O by a Global Warming Potential (GWP). GWPs for both CH 4 and N2 are presented within the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Ch ange (IPCC) report as being 25 and 298, respectively (IPCC, 2007).

2.2 Climate and Meteorology

Climate within the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB) area often varies dramatically over short geographical distances with cooler temperatures on the western coast gradually warming to the east as prevailing winds from the west heats up. Most of southern California is dominated by high-pressure systems for much of the year, which keeps San Diego mostly sunny and warm. Typically, during the winter months, the high-pressure system drops to the south and brings cooler, moister weather from the north. It is common for inversion layers to develop within high-pressure areas, which mostly define pressure patterns over the SDAB. These inversions are caused when a thin layer of the atmosphere increases in temperature with height. An inversion acts like a lid preventing vertical mixing of air through convective overturning. The City of San Marcos is within the SDAB so the same generalizations are true for the City.

Meteorological trends within the area generally show daytime highs ranging between 64ºF in the winter to approximately 88ºF in the summer with August usually being the hottest month.

Daytime Low temperatures range from approximately 37ºF in the winter to approximately 59ºF in the summer. Precipitation is generally about 16.2 inches per year (WRCC, 2021).

Prevailing wind patterns for the area vary duri ng any given month during the year and also vary depending on the time of day or night. The predominant pattern though throughout the year is usually from the west or westerly (WRCC, 2018).

7 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report

3.0 CLIMATE CHANGE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

3.1 State

State Greenhouse Gas Targets

Executive Order S-3-05

EO S-3-05 (June 2005) established the following statewide goals: GHG emissions should be reduced to 2000 levels by 2010, 1990 levels by 2020, and 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.

AB 32 and CARB’s Climate Change Scoping Plan

In furtherance of the goals es tablished in EO S-3-05, the Le gislature enacted Assembly Bill (AB) 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. AB 32 re quires California to reduce its GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.

Under AB 32, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) is responsible for and is recognized as having the expertise to carry out and deve lop the programs and regulations necessary to achieve the GHG emissions reduction mandate of AB 32. Therefore, in furtherance of AB 32, CARB adopted regulations requiring the reporting and verification of GHG emissions from specified sources, such as industrial facilities, fuel suppliers and electricity importers (see Health & Safety Code Section 35830; Cal. Code Regs., tit. 17, §§95100 et seq.). CARB is also required to adopt rules and regulations to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective GHG emission reductions. AB 32 authorized CARB to adopt market-based compliance mechanisms to meet the specified requirements. Finally, CARB is ultimately responsible for monitoring compliance and enfo rcing any rule, regulation, order, emission limitation, emission reduction measure, or market-based compliance mechanism adopted.

In 2007, CARB approved a limit on the statewide GHG emissions level for year 2020 consistent with the determined 1990 baseline (427 million metric tons (MMT) CO2E). CARB’s adoption of this limit is in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 38550.

Further, in 2008, CARB adopted the Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change (2008 Scoping Plan ) in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 38561. The 2008 Scoping Plan established an overall framework for the measures to be implemented to reduce California’s GHG emissions for various emission sources/sectors to 1990 levels by 2020. The 2008 Scoping Plan evaluated opportunities for sector-specific reductions,

8 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
integrated all CARB and Climate Action Team 1 early actions and additional GHG reduction features by both entities, identified additional measures to be pursued as regulations, and outlined the role of a cap-and-trade program.

In the 2008 Scoping Plan, CARB determined that achieving the 1990 emissions level in 2020 would require a reduction in GHG emissions of approximately 28.5 percent from the otherwise projected 2020 emissions level; i.e., those emissions that would occur in 2020, absent GHG- reducing laws and regulations (referred to as “Business-As-Usual” [BAU]). For purposes of calculating this percent reduction, CARB assumed that all new electricity generation would be supplied by natural gas plants, no further regulatory action would impact vehicle fuel efficiency, and building energy efficiency codes would be held at 2005 standards.

In the 2011 Final Supplement to the
2008 Scoping Plan’s Functional Equivalent Document,
CARB revised its estimates of the projected 2020 emissions level in light of the economic recession and the availability of updated information about GHG reduction regulations. Based on the new economic data, CARB determined that achieving the 1990 emissions level by 2020 would require a reduction in GHG emissions of 21.7 percent (down from 28.5 percent) from the BAU conditions. When the 2020 emissions level projection was updated to account for newly implemented regulatory measures, incl uding Pavley I (model years 2009–2016) and the Renewables Portfolio Standard (12 percent to 20 percent), CARB determined that achieving the 1990 emissions level in 2020 would require a reduction in GHG emissions of 16 percent (down from 28.5 percent) from the BAU conditions.

In 2014, CARB adopted the First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan: Building on the Framework (First Update). The stated purpose of the First Update was to “highlight California’s success to date in reducing its GHG emissions and lay the foundation for establishing a broad framework for continued emission reductions beyond 2020, on the path to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.” The First Update found that California was on track to meet the 2020 emissions reduction mandate established by AB 32, noted that Cali fornia could reduce emissions further by 2030 to leve ls squarely in line with those needed to stay on track to reduce emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 if the state realizes the expected benefits of existing policy goals.

EO B-30-15

EO B-30-15 (April 2015) identified an interim GHG reduction target in support of targets previously identified under S-3-05 and AB 32. EO B-30-15 set an interim goal of reducing

1 The Climate Action Team is comprised of state ag ency secretaries and heads of state agencies, boards and departments; these members work to coor dinate statewide efforts to implement GHG emissions reduction programs and adaptation programs.

9 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
statewide GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1 990 levels by 2030 to keep California on its trajectory toward meeting or exceeding the long-term goal of reducing statewide GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 as set forth in S-3-05. To facilitate achievement of this goal, EO B-30-1 5 calls for an update to CARB’s Scoping Plan to express the 2030 target in terms of MMT CO 2e. The EO also calls for state agencies to continue to develop and implement GHG emission reductio n programs in support of the reduction targets. Sector-specific agencies in transportation, energy, water, and forestry were required to prepare GHG reduction plans by September 2015, followed by a report on action taken in relation to these plans in June 2016.

SB 32 and AB 197

SB 32 and AB 197 (enacted in 2016) are companion bills that set a new statewide GHG reduction target; make changes to CARB’s membership and increase legislative oversight of CARB’s climate change-based activities; and expand dissemination of GHG and other air quality-related emissions data to enhance transparency and accountability. More specifically, SB 32 codified the 2030 emissions reduction goal of EO B-30-15 by requiring CARB to ensure that statewide GHG emissions are reduced to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. AB 197 established the Joint Legislative Committee on Climate Change Policies, consisting of at least three members of the Senate and three members of the Assembly, in order to provide ongoing oversight over implementation of the state’s climate policies. AB 197 also added two members of the Legislature to CARB as nonvoting member s. The legislation further requires CARB to make available and update (at least annually via its website) emissions data for GHGs, criteria air pollutants, and TACs from reporting facilitie s; and identify specific information for GHG emissions reduction measures when updating the scoping plan, including information regarding the range of projected GHG emissions and air pollution reductions that result from each measure and the cost-effectiveness (includi ng avoided social costs) of each measure (see Health & Safety Code Section 38562.7).

2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan

In November 2017, CARB released California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan for public review and comment (CARB, 2017). This update includes CARB’s strategy for achieving the state’s 2030 GHG target as established in Senate Bill (SB) 32 (discussed below). The strategy includes continuing the Cap-and-Trade Program through 2030, 2 inclusive policies and broad support for clean technologies, enhanced industrial efficiency and competitiveness, prioritization of transportation sustainability, continued leadership on clean energy, putting

2 In July 2017, AB 398 was enacted into law, thereb y extending the legislatively-authorized lifetime of the Cap-and-Trade Program to December 31, 2030.

10 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
waste resources to beneficial use, supporting resilient agricu ltural and rural economics and natural and working lands, securing California’s water supplies, and cleaning the air and public health. When discussing project-level GHG em issions reduction action s and thresholds, the 2017 Scoping Plan states “[a]chieving no net additional increase in GHG emissions, resulting in no contribution to GHG impacts, is an appropriate overall objective for new development.” However, the 2017 Scoping Plan also recognizes that such an achievement “may not be feasible or appropriate for every project … and the inability of a project to mitigate its GHG emissions to net zero does not imply the project results in a substantial contribution to the cumulatively significant environmental impact of climate change under CEQA.” CARB’s Governing Board adopted the 2017 Scoping Plan in December 2017.

Building Energy

Title 24, Part 6

Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations was established in 1978 and serves to enhance and regulate California’s building standards. While not initially promulgated to reduce GHG emissions, Part 6 of Title 24 specifically establishes Building Energy Efficiency Standards that are designed to ensure new buildings and alterations or additions to existing buildings in California achieve energy efficiency and preserve outdoor and indoor environmental quality.

The California Energy Commission (CEC) is required by law to adopt standards every 3 years that are cost effective for homeowners over the 30-year lifespan of a building. These standards are updated to consider and incorporate new energy efficient technologies and construction methods. As a result, these stan dards save energy, increase electricity supply reliability, increase indoor comfort, avoid the need to construct new power plants, and help preserve the environment.

The 2016 Title 24 standards, which went into effect on January 1, 2017. When comparing the 2013 and 2016 standards for electrical co nsumption, it is expected that low ‐rise, single‐ family detached homes and multi-family homes would use 12 percent and 15 percent less electricity under the 2016 standards, respectively. Similarly, implementation of the 2016 standards is expected to reduce natural gas consumption by 21 percent in single-family homes and 31 percent in multi-family homes. Newly constructed non-residential buildings are estimated to achieve a 5 percent reduction in electricity consumption under the 2016 standards and no significant change relative to natural gas consumption (California Energy Commission, 2015). The current version of CalEEMod used in this analysis employs, as a default parameter, the 2016 Title 24 standards to estimate GHG emissions.

The Project would be required, at a minimum, to comply with the latest version of Title 24 standards at the time the Project seeks buil ding permits. At the time this report was

11 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
written, the 2019 standards were applicable and went into effect on January 1, 2020. The 2019 standards continue to improve upon the 2016 standards for residential and nonresidential buildings. One of the most notable changes in the 2019 standards is the requirement for the installation of rooftop solar on residential buildings (California Energy Commission, 2017). It should be noted that the State updates these regulations every three years. Thus, throughout Project constructi on, buildings will need comply with the most recently adopted standards.

Title 24, Part 11

In addition to the CEC’s efforts, in 2008, the California Building Standards Commission adopted the nation’s first green building standards. The California Green Building Standards Code (Part 11 of Title 24) is commonly referr ed to as CALGreen and establishes minimum mandatory standards as well as voluntary standa rds pertaining to the planning and design of sustainable site development, energy efficien cy (in excess of the California Energy Code requirements), water conservation, material conservation, and interior air quality. The CALGreen standards initially took effect in January 2011 and instituted mandatory minimum environmental performance standards for all gr ound-up, new construction of commercial, low-rise residential and state-owned buildings and schools and hospitals. The CALGreen 2016 standards became effective on January 1, 2017. The mandatory standards require the following (24 CCR Part 11):

• Mandatory reduction in indoor water use through compliance with specified flow rates for plumbing fixtures and fittings
• Mandatory reduction in outdoor water use through compliance with a local water efficient landscaping ordinance or the California Department of Water Resources’ Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
• Sixty-five (65) percent of construction and demolition waste must be diverted from landfills • Mandatory inspections of energy systems to ensure optimal working efficiency • Inclusion of EV charging stations or design ated spaces capable of supporting future charging stations
• Low-pollutant emitting exterior and interior finish materials, such as paints, carpets, vinyl flooring, and particle boards

The CALGreen standards also include voluntary efficiency measures that are provided at two separate tiers and implemented at the discretion of local agencies and applicants. CALGreen’s Tier 1 standards call for a 15 percent improv ement in energy requirements; stricter water conservation, 10 percent recycled content in building materials, 20 percent permeable paving, 20 percent cement reduction, and cool/solar-reflective roofs. CALGreen’s more rigorous Tier 2 standards call for a 30 percent improvement in energy requirements, stricter water conservation, 75 percent diversion of construction and demolition waste, 15 percent recycled

12 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
content in building materials, 30 percent permeable paving, 25 percent cement reduction, and cool/solar-reflective roofs.

The CALGreen standards were again updated in 2019 which includes mandatory measures for planning and design, energy efficiency, wa ter and conservation efficiency, material and resource conservation as well as Environmental Quality. A thorough checklist is provided by California’s Housing and Community Development Department (Housing and Community Development, 2019). The project would be required to utilize th e latest CalGreen standards (International Code Council, 2019).

Title 20

Title 20 of the California Code of Regulations requires manufacturers of appliances to meet state and federal standards for energy and water efficiency. Performance of appliances must be certified through the CEC to demonstrat e compliance with standa rds. New appliances regulated under Title 20 include: refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers and freezers; room air conditioners and room air-conditioning heat pumps; central air conditioners; spot air conditioners; vented gas space heaters; gas po ol heaters; plumbing fittings and plumbing fixtures; fluorescent lamp ballasts; lamps; emergency lighting; traffic signal modules; dishwaters; clothes washers and dryers; cookin g products; electric motors; low voltage dry- type distribution transformers; power supplie s; televisions and consumer audio and video equipment; and battery charger systems. Title 20 presents protocols for testing for each type of appliance covered under the regulations and appliances must m eet the standards for energy performance, energy design, water perf ormance and water design. Title 20 contains three types of standards for appliances: federal and state standards for federally regulated appliances, state standards for federally regu lated appliances, and state standards for non- federally regulated appliances.

Mobile Sources

AB 1493

In response to the transportation sector accounting for more than half of California’s CO 2 emissions, AB 1493 was enacted in July 2002 . AB 1493 required CARB to set GHG emission standards for passenger vehicles, light-duty truc ks, and other vehicles determined by CARB to be vehicles that are primarily used for noncommercial personal transportation in the state.

The bill required that CARB set GHG emission standards for motor vehicles manufactured in 2009 and all subsequent model years. CARB adopted the standards in September 2004. When fully phased in, the near-term (2009–2012) standards will result in a reduction of about 22

13 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
percent in GHG emissions compared to the emissions from the 2002 fleet, while the mid-term (2013–2016) standards will result in a reduction of about 30 percent.

EO S-1-07

Issued in January 2007, EO S-1-07 sets a de clining Low Carbon Fuel Standard for GHG emissions measured in CO 2e grams per unit of fuel energy sold in California. The carbon intensity measures the amount of GHG emissi ons in the lifecycle of a fuel, including extraction/feedstock production, processing, transportation, and final consumption, per unit of energy delivered. CARB adopted the implementing regulation in April 2009 and began implementation in 2011. The LCFS is designed to encourage the use of cleaner low-carbon transportation fuels in California, encourage the production of those fuels, and therefore, reduce GHG emissions and decrease petroleum dependence in the transportation sector.

The latest amendment to LCFS implementation regulations was in 2018 and CARB approved amendments which included strengthening and smoothing the carbon intensity benchmarks through 2030 in-line with California's 2030 GHG emission reduction target enacted through SB 32 (CARB, 2018).

SB 375

SB 375 (2008) addresses GHG emissions associ ated with the transportation sector through regional transportation and sustainability plans. SB 375 required CARB to adopt regional GHG reduction targets for the auto mobile and light-truck sector for 2020 and 2035. Regional metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) are then responsible for preparing a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) within their Regional Transportation Plan. The goal of the SCS is to establish a forecasted development patt ern for the region that, after considering transportation measures and policies, will achiev e, if feasible and if implemented, the GHG reduction targets. If a SCS is unable to achieve the GHG reduction target, an MPO must prepare an Alternative Planning Strategy demonstrating how the GHG reduction target would be achieved through alternative development patterns, infrastructure, or additional transportation measures or policies.

Pursuant to Government Code Section 65080(b)(2 )(K), a SCS does not: (i) regulate the use of land; (ii) supersede the land use authority of cities and counties; or (iii) require that a city’s or county’s land use policies and regulations, including those in a general plan, be consistent with it. Nonetheless, SB 375 makes regional an d local planning agencies responsible for developing those strategies as part of the federally required metropolitan transportation planning process and the state-mandated housing element process.

14 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
In 2010, CARB adopted the SB 375 targets for the regional metr opolitan planning organizations. The targets for SANDAG adopted in 2010 are a 7 percent reduction in emissions per capita by 2020 and a 13 percent reduction by 2035; the targets are expressed as a percent change in per capita passenger vehicle GHG emissions relative to 2005.

In October 2015, SANDAG adopted San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan , which contains the region’s current SCS. In December 2015, CARB, by resolution, accepted SANDAG’s GHG emissions quantification analysis and determ ination that, if implemented, the SCS would achieve CARB’s 2020 and 2035 GHG emissions reduction targets for the region. More specifically, as set forth in CARB Executive Order G-15-075, CARB determined that SANDAG’s SCS would achieve a 15 percent per capita re duction by 2020 and a 21 percent per capita reduction by 2035.

In 2018, CARB updated the SB 375 targets. For purposes of SANDAG, the updated targets include a 15 percent reduction in emissions per capita by 2020 and a 19 percent reduction by 2035 (CARB, 2018). SANDAG is in the process of preparing its next SCS, which will consider whether and how the region could attain these reduction targets.

Currently SANDAG is working on the 2021 Region al Plan. The current Draft Plan provides a big picture vision for how the San Diego regi on will grow through 2050 and beyond with an implementation program to help make the plan a reality. Within the Draft Plan, SANDAG introduced a transformative vision for transportation in San Diego County that completely reimagines how people and goods could move throughout the region in the 21st century. The plan outlines the “5 Big Moves” which are: Complete Corridors, Transit Leap, Mobility Hubs, Flexible Fleets, and the Next OS. The SANDAG Board of Directors will be asked to adopt the 2021 Regional Plan in late 2021. Once adopted, it will become the region’s long-term plan to be implemented incrementally through the Re gional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) (SANDAG, 2021).

Advanced Clean Cars Program

In January 2012, CARB approved the Advanced Clean Cars program, a new emissions-control program for model years 2015 through 2025. The program combines the control of smog- and soot-causing pollutants and GHG emission s into a single coor dinated package. The package includes elements to reduce smog-forming pollution, reduce GHG emissions, promote clean cars, and provide the fuels for clean cars (CARB, 2017). To improve air quality, CARB also has implemented new emission standards to reduce smog-forming emissions beginning with 2015 model year vehicles. It is estimated that, in 2025, cars will emit 75 percent less smog-forming pollution than the average new car sold today. To reduce GHG emissions, CARB, in conjunction with the EPA and the NHTSA, also has adopted new GHG standards for

15 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
model year 2017 to 2025 vehicles; the new standards are estimated to reduce GHG emissions by 34 percent in 2025 (California Air Resources Board, 2012).

EO B-16-12

EO B-16-12 (March 2012) directs state entities under the Governor’s direction and control to support and facilitate developmen t and distribution of ZEVs. Th is EO also sets a long-term target of reaching 1.5 million zero-emission vehi cles on California’s roadways by 2025. On a statewide basis, EO B-16-12 also establishe s a GHG emissions reduction target from the transportation sector equaling 80 percent less than 1990 levels by 2050. In furtherance of this EO, the Governor convened an Interagency Working Group on Zero-Emission Vehicles that has published multiple reports regarding the progress made on the penetration of ZEVs in the statewide vehicle fleet.

SB 350

In 2015, SB 350 – the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act – was enacted into law. As one of its elements, SB 350 establishes a statewide policy for widespread electrification of the transportation sector, recognizing that such electrification is required for achievement of the state’s 2030 and 2050 reduction targets (see Public Utilities Code Section 740.12).

Renewable Energy Procurement

SB 1078

SB 1078 (2002) established the Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) program, which requires an annual increase in renewable generation by the utilities equivalent to at least 1 percent of sales, with an aggregate goal of 20 percent by 2017. This goal was subsequently accelerated, requiring utilities to obtain 20 percent of their power from renewable sources by 2010.

SB X1 2

SB X1 2 (2011) expanded the RPS by establishing that 20 percent of the total electricity sold to retail customers in California per year by December 31, 2013, and 33 percent by December 31, 2020, and in subsequent years be secured from qualifying renewable energy sources. Under the bill, a renewable electrical generation facility is one that uses biomass, solar thermal, photovoltaic, wind, geothermal, fuel cells using renewable fuels, small hydroelectric generation of 30 megawatts or less, digester gas, municipal solid waste conversion, landfill gas, ocean wave, ocean th ermal, or tidal current, and that meets other

16 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
specified requirements with respect to its location. In addition to the retail sellers previously covered by the RPS, SB X1 2 added local, publ icly owned electric utilities to the RPS.

SB 350

SB 350 (2015) further expanded the RPS by establishing that 50 percent of the total electricity sold to retail customers in California per year by December 31, 2030 be secured from qualifying renewable energy sources. In addition, SB 350 includes the goal to double the energy efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas final end uses (such as heating, cooling, lighting, or class of energy uses on which an energy-efficiency program is focused) of retail customers through energy conservation and efficiency.

SB 100

SB 100 (2018) has further accelerated and expanded the RPS, requiring achievement of a 50 percent RPS by December 31, 2026 and a 60 percent RPS by December 31, 2030. SB 100 also established a new statewide policy goal that calls for eligible renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources to supply 100 percent of electricity retail sales within the State of California by December 31, 2045.

Water

EO B-29-15

In response to drought-related concerns, EO B-29-15 (April 2015) set a goal of achieving a statewide reduction in potable urban water usage of 25 percent relative to water use in 2013.

The term of the EO extended through February 28, 2016, although many of the directives have since become permanent water-efficiency standards and requirements. The EO includes specific directives that set strict limits on wa ter usage in the state. In response to EO B-29- 15, the California Department of Water Resources has modified and adopted a revised version of the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance that, among other changes, significantly increases the requirements for landscape water use efficiency and broadens its applicability to include new development projects with smaller landscape areas.

Solid Waste

AB 939 and AB 341

AB 939 (1989), known as the Integrated Waste Management Act (Public Resources Code Sections 40000 et seq.), was passed becaus e of the increase in waste stream and the

17 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
decrease in landfill capacity. The statute established the Califor nia Integrated Waste Management Board, which oversees a disp osal reporting system. AB 939 mandated a reduction of waste being disposed where jurisdictions were required to meet diversion goals of all solid waste through source reduction, recycling, and composting activities of 25 percent by 1995 and 50 percent by the year 2000.

AB 341 (2011) amended the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 to include a provision declaring that it is the policy goal of the state that not less than 75 percent of solid waste generated be sour ce-reduced, recycled, or comp osted by the year 2020, and annually thereafter. In addition, AB 341 requir ed the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to develop strategies to achieve the state’s policy goal.

CalRecycle has conducted multiple workshops and published documents that identify priority strategies that CalRecycle believes would assist the state in reaching the 75 percent goal by 2020.

Increasing the amount of commercial solid wast e that is recycled, reused, or composted will reduce GHG emissions primarily by 1) reducing the energy requirements associated with the extraction, harvest, and processing of raw materials and 2) using recyclable materials that require less energy than raw materials to manufacture finished products (CalRecycle, 2020) Increased diversion of organic materials (gr een and food waste) will also reduce GHG emissions (CO2 and CH4) resulting from decomposition in landfills by redirecting this material to processes that use the solid waste material to produce vehicle fuels, heat, electricity, or compost.

3.2 Local Thresholds of Significance

The City of San Marcos (City) adopted an updated Climate Action Plan (CAP) on December 8, 2020. The CAP outlines strategies and measures that the City will undertake to achieve its proportional share of State GHG emissions reduction targets. The CAP is a plan for the reduction of GHG emissions in accordance wit h California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183.5. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15064(h)(3), 15130(d), and 15183(b), a project’s incremental contribution to a cumulative GHG emissions effect may be determined not to be cumulatively considerable if it complies with the City of San Marcos’ specific target requirements of the CAP (City of San Marcos, 2020).

• 4 percent below 2012 levels (575,000 MTCO2e) by 2020, • 42 percent below 2012 levels (347,000 MTCO2e) by 2030

The City has also developed a Climate Action Plan Consistency Review Checklist (CAP Checklist), in conjunction with the CAP, to provide a streamlined review process for proposed new development projects that are subject to discretionary review and trigger environmental

18 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
review pursuant to CEQA. The CAP Consistency Guidance Memo dated July 15, 2020 summarizes the methodology and application of a GHG screening threshold which is set at 500 metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent [MTCO2e] per year as outlined int the CAP (Ascent, 2020). Projects that are projected to emit fewer than 500 MTCO2e annually would not make a considerable contribution to the cumulative impact of climate change and would not need to provide additional analysis to demonstrate consistency with the CAP. It should be noted that this screening threshold is for new development projects consistent with the City’s General Plan. When such a project exceeds the screening threshold, the project would be required to demonstrate consistency with the CAP through the CAP Consistency Checklist.

In most cases, compliance with the Checklist would provide the CEQA streamlining path to allow project specific environmental documents, if eligible, to tier from and/or incorporate by reference the CAP’s programmatic review of GHG impacts. Projects that are consistent with the General Plan and implement CAP GHG reduction measures may incorporate by reference the CAP’s cumulative GHG analysis. The City’s CAP meets the requirements under Section 15183.5 of the CEQA Guidelines as a qualified plan for the reduction of GHG emissions for use in cumulative impact analysis pertaining to development projects. The Checklist provides a streamlined review process for the GHG emis sions analysis of proposed new development projects that are subject to discretionary review and trigger environmental review pursuant to CEQA.

If a project is consistent with the existing General Plan land use designation(s), it can be determined to be consistent with the CAP projections and can move forward to Step 2 of the Checklist.

For projects seeking a General Plan Amendment, CAP consistency can be assumed as long as the amendment results in an equivalent or less GHG-intensive project when compared to the existing designations. In addition to providing evidence to support the conclusion that the project would generate fewer emissions than existing designations, these projects would demonstrate consistency with the CAP through completion of Step 2 of the Checklist.

If a land use designation amendment results in a more GHG-intensive project, the project is required to prepare a quantitative GHG analysis based on applicable sections of the CEQA Guidelines and is not eligible for GHG analysis streamlining using the CAP Checklist.

Since the project is proposing a Specific Plan Amendment, this analysis compares the anticipated GHG emission under the existing UDSP with the proposed UDSPA.

19 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report

4.0 METHODOLOGY

4.1 Construction CO 2e Emissions Calculation Methodology

GHGs related to construction and daily operations were calculated using the latest CalEEMod 2020.4.0 GHG model. The purpose of this analysis is to complete a comparison between the proposed UDSPA and the 2014 approved UDSP and was conducted using the same default construction assumptions provided by CalEEMod. The UDSPA proposes to add two parcels to the UDSP planning area and would be8 acres larger than the 2014 approved UDSP. This was accounted for in CalEEMod. This method would demonstrate the relative difference between construction emissions for the two plans. The CalEEMod construction model with estimated buildout dates is shown in Table 4.1 below and is broad enough to build out either the UDSP or UDSPA (expected by 2038). The complete CalEEMod model is shown in Attachment A for the UDSP and Attachment B for the UDSPA.

Table 4.1: Expected Construction Equipment
Equipment Identification Proposed Start Proposed Completion Quantity Demolition 1/28/2022 11/3/2022
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1
Excavators 3
Rubber Tired Dozers 2
Site Preparation 11/4/2022 4/20/2023
Rubber Tired Dozers 3
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4
Grading 4/21/2023 6/27/2024
Excavators 2
Graders 1
Rubber Tired Dozers 1
Scrapers 2
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2
Building Construction 6/28/2024 5/15/2036
Cranes 1
Forklifts 3
Generator Sets 1
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3
Welders 1
Paving 5/16/2036 3/19/2037
Pavers 2
Paving Equipment 2
Rollers 2
Architectural Coating 3/20/2037 1/21/2038
Air Compressors 1
This equipment list is based upon equipment inventory within CALEEMOD 2020.4.0.

20 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
It should be noted that the UDSP included some rock blasting and crushing. The UDSPA would not increase these projections which may be underway or completed at the time this report was written. Since the UDSPA would not add any additional blasting and since most of the blasting has already occurred, the UDSPA would not increase or decrease GHG emissions generated within the UDSPA over buildout.

4.2 Operational Emissions Calculation Methodology

Once construction is complete, the proposed project would generate GHG emissions from daily operations which would include source s such as area (or onsite emissions like landscaping), energy usage from electricity an d natural gas, mobile sources from vehicular traffic, municipal waste and from water uses , which are calculated within CalEEMod. For consistency with the CAP, the project was analyzed under the 2030 year scenario.

It should be noted that electrical energy-intensity factors were updated in CalEEMod 2020.4.0 to reflect San Diego Gas and Electric’s (SDG&E ) latest emissions rates. CalEEMod 2016.3.2 (the model prior to 2020.4.0) was based on default emission s from 2009 which included a

10.5% RPS factor (California Public Ut ilities Commission, 2016). For SDG&E CalEEMod 2020.4.0 updated the emissions as if a 33% RPS was achieved or roughly 540 pounds per megawatt hour (lb/MWh). In accordance with SB 100, SDG&E will achieve an RPS of 60% in 2030. After correcting the emissions based on 2009 RPS achievements, the emission factors in 2030 are shown in Table 4.2.

Table 4.2: SDG&E Energy Intensity Factors
GHG
2009 Factors
(lbs/MWh) w/10.5%
RPS
Current RPS Factors
2020 33% Achieved
(lbs/MWh)
Current RPS Factors
2030 60% Achieved
(lbs/MWh)
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 720.49 539.98 322.38
Methane (CH4) 0.029 0.033 0.0197
Nitrous Oxide (N2O) 0.006 0.004 0.0024

Solid municipal waste generated in the form of trash is also considered within this analysis as the decomposition of organic material breaks down to form GHGs. GHGs from water are also indirectly generated th rough the conveyance of the reso urce via pumping throughout the state and as necessary for wastewater treatment. The Project traffic engineer estimated that the currently approved UDSP would generate 92,880 daily trips (RBF Consulting, 2014). The UDSPA was also analyzed using the same trip generation rates and is estimated generate 61,017 daily trips or 31,863 trips less than the UDSP. This change in total trips reflects the proposed land use changes.

21 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
Since the project was analyzed in 2014, some of the UDSP has been built out. The UDSPA includes specific build out projects such as a bowling a lley and some medical educational facilities and trip generation rates from th e 2014 UDSP study which are notably different.

Since this is a comparative analysis, CalEEMod defaults were updated to reflect methodologies used to develop both the UDSP and UDSPA tra ffic generation assuming uses identified in Table 1.1 above. This methodology relies on trip generation rates from SANDAG’s (Not So) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rate for the San Diego Region (SANDAG, 2002) for each land use with the exception of the Community/Civic use, which relied on the ITE trip generation rates. The operational modeling re sults for the UDSP and UDSPA are shown in Attachments A and -B respectively.

It should be noted: the UDSPA traffic was also analyzed in 2022 and it was determined the project would generate 58,517 daily trips (Urb an System Associates, 2022) or 34,363 less than the approved UDSP. This difference in traffic generation was a result of the proposed land uses changes and actual trip generation rates for specific uses that have been built since the 2014 traffic study was completed. Conservatively, for modeling proposes the higher traffic generation rates were utilized within this analysis.

Finally, no trip generation was assigned to the parks/urban open space, urban trails/paths, preserved open space and public streets categories for both analysis scenarios as they are considered to be ancillary uses and is consis tent with the approved UDSP traffic impact assessment (RBF Consulting, 2014).

22 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report

5.0 FINDINGS

5.1 Project Related Construction Emissions

Utilizing the CALEEMOD 2020.4.0 co nstruction inputs as shown in Table 4.1, we find that construction of the UDSP and UDSPA would generate GHG emissions over roughly a 17 year duration. Over that time the total combined cumulative GHG emissions for the UDSP would be 74,533 MT CO2e and the proposed UDSPA would generate 71,950 MT CO 2e or 2,583 MT CO2e less than the UDSP over the construction life of the project. A summary of the total cumulative GHG emission over a 17-year construction lifecycle for both the UDSP and the UDSPA are shown in Table 5.1.

GHGs were also annualized over a 30-year pe riod to allow for inclusion in operational emissions estimates further in this report which is consistent with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) recommendations for construction GHG emissions (SCAQMD, 2008). Yearly amortized estimates are lower under proposed UDSPA versus the UDSP which are also shown in Attachments A and -B.

As noted earlier, the UDSP included some rock blasting and crushing. The UDSPA would not alter any blasting requirements for the site. Based on this, approval of the UDSPA would have neither increase nor decrease GHG emissions generated from blasting efforts within the UDSPA buildout area.

Table 5.1: Cumulative Construction CO2e Emissions Summary (MT) Year Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
(MT Total)
UDSP
(Currently approved plan) 0 72,899 72,899 3 5 74,533
UDSPA (proposed project) 0 70,388 70,388 3 5 71,950
Decreased Construction Emissions over UDSP 2,583
Amortized UDSP Construction Emissions (MT/Year) 2,484
Amortized UDSPA Construction Emissions (MT/Year) 2,398
Expected Construction emissions are based upon CalEEMod modeling assumptions for equipment and durations listed in Table 4.1.

5.2 Specific Plan Operational Emissions

Once buildout of the specific plan area is fully operational GHG emissions will be generated from sources such as area, energy, mobile, solid waste and water uses, which are calculated

23 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
within CalEEMod. Area Sources include consumer products, landscaping and architectural coatings as part of regular maintenance. Energy sources would be from electricity usage and natural gas. Solid waste generated in the form of trash is also considered as decomposition of organic material breaks down to form GHGs. Water sources include standard residential uses including landscaping activities.

This assessment is driven by the CAP and since the UDSPA would be required to demonstrate that the proposed operations would be less intense than what was otherwise occur under the current UDSP. Under the CAP if the UDSPA resu lts is fewer GHG emissions than the UDSP, the project would generate less than significant impacts under the CAP and would be required to implement the applicable CAP Measures identified in Step 2 of the CAP Consistency Review Checklist.

UDSP Operational Emissions Findings

Table 5.2 below indicates that the currently approved UDSP would generate 86,086 MT CO2e per year without incorporating any CAP measures. Individual projects within the UDSP would be required to implement CAP measures whic h would further reduce GHG emissions. Since the intent of this analysis is to compare the UDSP with the UDSPA, no reductions were included.

Table 5.2: UDSP Operational Emissions Summary (MT/Year) Source Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
(MT/Yr)
Area 3,512 1,514 5,026 3 0 5,191
Energy 0 10,638 10,638 0 0 10,685
Mobile 0 61,556 61,556 5 3 62,524
Waste 1,333 0 1,333 79 0 3,301
Water 139 1,299 1,438 14 0 1,901
Operations Emissions 83,602
Construction Emissions 2,484
Project Total 86,086
Data is presented in decimal format and may have rounding errors.

UDSPA Operational Emissions Findings

Table 5.3 below indicates that the UDSPA would generate 70,050 MT CO 2e per year without incorporating any CAP measures. Individual projects within the UDSPA would be required to implement all CAP measures which would further reduce GHG emissions. Since the intent of this analysis is to compare the UDSP with the UDSPA, no reductions were included.

24 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report

Table 5.3: UDSPA Operational Emissions Summary (MT/Year) Source Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
(MT/Yr)
Area 3,512 1,514 5,026 3 0 5,191
Energy 0 9,075 9,075 0 0 9,115
Mobile 0 48,008 48,008 3 2 48,747
Waste 1,069 0 1,069 63 0 2,648
Water 141 1,341 1,483 15 0 1,952
Operations Emissions 67,652
Construction Emissions 2,398
Project Total 70,050
Data is presented in decimal format and may have rounding errors.

Comparison of the UDSPA and the UDSP Buildout Scenario

When the total UDSPA GHG emissions are compared to the total GHG emission under the current UDSP, the project results in a 18.6% reduction in GHG emissions (70,050 MT CO 2e per year compared to 86,086 MT CO 2e per year). This reduction is largely driven by the reduced number of vehicle trips that would occur under the UDSPA compared to buildout under the UDSP since the land use intensity is largely reduced. Based on this logic, the UDSPA would have a less than significant GHG impact. It should be noted that under the City’s CAP, all future connected projects under the UDSPA would be required to implement all applicable CAP Measures identified in Step 2 of the CAP Consistency Review Checklist.

5.3 CEQA Compliance

SB 97 directed amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) statute to specifically establish that GHG emissions and their impacts are appropriate subjects for CEQA analysis. Under SB 97 the project should be able to answer the follow questions for CEQA compliance.

1. Will the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?

The City is committed to reducing its GHG emissions through compliance with the City’s CAP.

If a project includes a General Plan land use amendment that would result in an equivalent or less GHG-intensive project wh en compared to the existing designations, it would still be within the projections assumed in the CAP. In addition to providing evidence to support the

25 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
conclusion that the project would generate fewer emissions than existing designations, these projects would demonstrate consistency with th e CAP through completion of Step 2 of the Checklist and incorporate all applicable CAP measures.

The UDSPA was found to emit 70,050 MT CO 2e per year and the UDSP generate 86,086 MT CO2e per year. Given this, the UDSPA results in a 18.6% reduction in GHG emissions compared of the UDSP. Given this, the project would be consistent with Part 1 of the City’s CAP Consistency Review Checklist and can be approv ed subject to all new project actions within the UDSPA to implement all applicable CAP Measures identified in Step 2 of the CAP Consistency Review Checklist.

2. Will the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?

The UDSPA was found to emit 70,050 MT CO
2e per year and the UDSP generate 86,086 MT
CO2e per year. The project results in a 18.6% reduction in GHG emissions compared to buildout of the UDSP. CAP consistency can be assumed as long as the amendment results in an equivalent or less GHG-intensive project when compared to the existing designations. In addition to providing evidence to support the conclusion that the project would generate fewer emissions than existing designations, these projects would demonstrate consistency with the CAP through completion of Step 2 of the Checklist. Based on this, a less than significant impact would be expected from the UDSPA.

26 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report

6.0 REFERENCES

Ascent. (2020). CAP Consistency Guidance Memo.

Associates, U. S. (2022). University District Local Transporation Analysis.

California Air Resources Board. (2012). www.arb.ca.gov. Retrieved from California Air Resources Board Approves Advanced Clean Car Rules:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/news/california-air-resources-board-approves-advanced-clean- car-rules
California Energy Commission. (2015, June 3). Retrieved from http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2016standards/rulemaking/documents/15- day_language/impact_analysis/2016_Impact_Analysis_2015-06-03.pdf California Energy Commission. (2017). Docket Log 17-BSTD-01 - Rooftop Solar PV Stystem Report (11-16-2017). Retrieved from
https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/Lists/DocketLog.aspx?docketnumber=17-BSTD-01 California Public Utilities Commission. (2016). Biennial RPS Program Update - In Compliance with Public Utilities Code Section 913.6. Retrieved from http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/uploadedFiles/CPUC_Website/Content/Utilities_and_Industries/ Energy/Reports_and_White_Papers/FINAL12302015Section913_6Report.pdf CalRecycle. (2020). https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov. Retrieved from https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/Climate/
CARB. (2017). California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. Retrieved from https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf CARB. (2017). The Advanced Clean Cars Program. Retrieved from https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/acc/acc_conceptdraft.htm
CARB. (2018). https://ww2.arb.ca.gov. Retrieved 2021, from https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our- work/programs/sustainable-communities-program/regional-plan-targets:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov
CARB. (2018). ww2.arb.ca.gov. Retrieved 2021, from
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/lcfs-basics: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our- work/programs/low-carbon-fuel-standard/about
City of San Marcos. (2020). Appendix D - Guidance to Demonstrating Consistency with the City of San Marcos Climate tion Plan for Discretionary Projects Subject to CEQA and City of San Marcos Climate Action Plan Consistency Review Checklist. Retrieved from https://www.san-marcos.net/home/showpublisheddocument?id=25086 City of San Marcos. (2020). Final Climate Action Plan. Retrieved from https://www.san- marcos.net/home/showpublisheddocument/25084/637435406644270000 Google. (2021). Retrieved 2021, from maps.google.com
Google Earth Pro. (2021).

Housing and Community Development. (2019). 2019 Residnetial Occupancies Application Checklist. Retrieved from https://www.hcd.ca.gov/building- standards/calgreen/docs/hcdshl615c.pdf
International Code Council. (2019). 2019 California Green Building Standards Code - Title 24, Part 11. Retrieved from https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/CAGBSC2019/cover IPCC. (2007). IPCC Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007 : Working Group I: The Physical Science Basis. Retrieved from
https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch2s2-10-2.html

27 Ldn Consulting, Inc. 5/13/22 21-90 UDSP GHG Report
RBF Consulting. (2014). University District Specific Plan Amendment Traffic Impact Assessment.

SANDAG. (2002). (Not So) Brief Guild of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rate.

SANDAG. (2021). Draft 2021 Regional Plan. Retrieved from https://sdforward.com/mobility- planning/2021-regional-plan-draft
SCAQMD. (2008). Retrieved 2018, from http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008- 2009/ghg-meeting-6/ghg-meeting-6-guidance-document-discussion.pdf WRCC. (2018). Retrieved from
https://wrcc.dri.edu/Climate/comp_table_show.php?stype=wind_dir_avg WRCC. (2021). ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA (042862). Retrieved from https://wrcc.dri.edu/summary/Climsmsca.html: https://wrcc.dri.edu/cgi- bin/cliMAIN.pl?ca2862

ATTACHMENT A

CalEEMod Emission Model – UDSP

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014)
San Diego County, Annual
Project Characteristics - RPS 2030 included
Land Use - Student Housing is considered mixed use residential for purposes of comparison analysis Trips and VMT -
Architectural Coating -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building
638.00
1000sqft

14.65 638,000.00
0 Government (Civic Center)

5.00 1000sqft

0.11 5,000.00
0 Medical Office Building
300.00
1000sqft

6.89 300,000.00
0 Elementary School
850.00
Student

1.63 71,062.86
0 Other Asphalt Surfaces

25.00 Acre

25.00 1,089,000.00
0 City Park

25.00 Acre

25.00 1,089,000.00
0 Hotel
450.00
Room

15.00 653,400.00
0 Apartments Mid Rise
3,400.00
Dwelling Unit

82.76 3,400,000.00
9724
Strip Mall
700.00
1000sqft

22.96 700,000.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
13 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)

2.6 40

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
San Diego Gas & Electric
2030
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
322.38

0.02 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.002
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 1 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Vehicle Trips - Rates based on SANDAG Trip Generation Per TS. Parks remain default in CalEEMod Area Coating -
Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater -
Solid Waste -
Fleet Mix -
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating
ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior
1,183,731.00
1,333,731.00
tblArchitecturalCoating
ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior
3,551,194.00
4,001,194.00
tblAreaCoating
Area_Nonresidential_Exterior
1183731
1333731
tblAreaCoating
Area_Nonresidential_Interior
3551194
4001194
tblLandUse
LotAcreage

89.47 82.76
tblLandUse
LotAcreage

16.07 22.96
tblProjectCharacteristics
CH4IntensityFactor

0.033

0.02 tblProjectCharacteristics
CO2IntensityFactor
539.98
322.38
tblProjectCharacteristics
N2OIntensityFactor

0.004

0.002
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

4.91 6.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

1.96 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

2.21 17.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

0.00 22.88
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

8.19 10.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

8.57 50.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

42.04 80.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

4.09 6.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

2.19 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

0.70 17.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

0.00 22.88
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

5.95 10.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 2 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

1.42 50.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

20.43 80.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

5.44 6.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

0.78 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

1.89 1.60
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

9.74 17.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

33.98 22.88
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

8.36 10.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

34.80 50.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

44.32 80.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 3 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022

0.3343

3.2541

2.5092

4.8000e-
003

0.4808

0.1574

0.6382

0.2179

0.1460

0.3639

0.0000
420.7791
420.7791

0.1180

3.6000e-
004
423.8359
2023

0.4125

4.2156

3.3169

7.3000e-
003

1.8674

0.1790

2.0465

0.7608

0.1647

0.9255

0.0000
641.8714
641.8714

0.2028

4.5000e-
004
647.0752
2024

1.1011

6.7030

9.9806

0.0394

3.6172

0.1581

3.7753

1.0050

0.1470

1.1520

0.0000
3,713.220
5 3,713.220
5 0.2440

0.2568
3,795.846
2 2025

1.6486

8.7746

15.2638

0.0674

5.3482

0.1288

5.4770

1.4433

0.1213

1.5646

0.0000
6,442.941
5 6,442.941
5 0.2488

0.4899
6,595.142
3 2026

1.5731

8.6340

14.6270

0.0657

5.3482

0.1275

5.4756

1.4433

0.1201

1.5633

0.0000
6,311.604
9 6,311.604
9 0.2439

0.4773
6,459.938
4 2027

1.5028

8.5052

14.0795

0.0641

5.3482

0.1259

5.4741

1.4433

0.1186

1.5619

0.0000
6,184.334
2 6,184.334
2 0.2396

0.4651
6,328.913
5 2028

1.4314

8.3655

13.5699

0.0624

5.3277

0.1239

5.4516

1.4377

0.1167

1.5544

0.0000
6,044.807
5 6,044.807
5 0.2354

0.4520
6,185.391
5 2029

1.3721

8.2856

13.2149

0.0612

5.3482

0.1227

5.4709

1.4433

0.1157

1.5589

0.0000
5,958.133
6 5,958.133
6 0.2335

0.4428
6,095.936
0 2030

1.3013

7.6079

12.8724

0.0605

5.3482

0.0718

5.4200

1.4433

0.0690

1.5122

0.0000
5,901.897
8 5,901.897
8 0.1736

0.4333
6,035.364
1 2031

1.2394

7.5439

12.5599

0.0594

5.3482

0.0706

5.4188

1.4433

0.0678

1.5111

0.0000
5,817.134
4 5,817.134
4 0.1712

0.4252
5,948.113
8 2032

1.1879

7.5210

12.3386

0.0587

5.3687

0.0697

5.4384

1.4488

0.0670

1.5158

0.0000
5,765.009
9 5,765.009
9 0.1697

0.4198
5,894.343
7 2033

1.1294

7.4207

12.0159

0.0574

5.3277

0.0681

5.3959

1.4377

0.0655

1.5033

0.0000
5,655.838
8 5,655.838
8 0.1665

0.4105
5,782.335
8 2034

1.0849

7.3817

11.8100

0.0567

5.3277

0.0671

5.3949

1.4377

0.0646

1.5024

0.0000
5,597.917
9 5,597.917
9 0.1649

0.4052
5,722.774
2 2035

1.0372

7.2753

11.6755

0.0563

5.3482

0.0590

5.4072

1.4433

0.0565

1.4998

0.0000
5,568.757
0 5,568.757
0 0.1629

0.4021
5,692.639
9 2036

0.5091

3.1325

5.6980

0.0235

2.0180

0.0375

2.0556

0.5445

0.0366

0.5811

0.0000
2,294.995
7 2,294.995
7 0.0689

0.1511
2,341.743
6 2037

78.8841

0.2819

1.8064

5.5700e-
003

0.6930

8.1200e-
003

0.7011

0.1842

7.9700e-
003

0.1921

0.0000
545.3234
545.3234

0.0101

9.4400e-
003
548.3893
2038

5.7690

0.0106

0.0993

3.5000e-
004

0.0505

2.1000e-
004

0.0507

0.0134

2.0000e-
004

0.0136

0.0000

34.8036

5.5000e-
004

6.9000e-
004

35.0222
Maximum

78.8841

8.7746

15.2638

0.0674

5.3687

0.1790

5.4770

1.4488

0.1647

1.5646

0.0000
6,442.941
5 6,442.941
5 0.2488

0.4899
6,595.142
3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 4 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 5 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022

0.3343

3.2541

2.5092

4.8000e-
003

0.4808

0.1574

0.6382

0.2179

0.1460

0.3639

0.0000
420.7786
420.7786

0.1180

3.6000e-
004
423.8354
2023

0.4125

4.2156

3.3169

7.3000e-
003

1.8674

0.1790

2.0465

0.7608

0.1647

0.9255

0.0000
641.8707
641.8707

0.2028

4.5000e-
004
647.0744
2024

1.1011

6.7030

9.9806

0.0394

3.6172

0.1581

3.7753

1.0050

0.1470

1.1520

0.0000
3,713.219
9 3,713.219
9 0.2440

0.2568
3,795.845
6 2025

1.6486

8.7746

15.2637

0.0674

5.3482

0.1288

5.4770

1.4433

0.1213

1.5646

0.0000
6,442.941
2 6,442.941
2 0.2488

0.4899
6,595.141
9 2026

1.5731

8.6340

14.6270

0.0657

5.3482

0.1275

5.4756

1.4433

0.1201

1.5633

0.0000
6,311.604
5 6,311.604
5 0.2439

0.4773
6,459.938
0 2027

1.5028

8.5052

14.0795

0.0641

5.3482

0.1259

5.4741

1.4433

0.1186

1.5619

0.0000
6,184.333
8 6,184.333
8 0.2396

0.4651
6,328.913
1 2028

1.4314

8.3655

13.5699

0.0624

5.3277

0.1239

5.4516

1.4377

0.1167

1.5544

0.0000
6,044.807
2 6,044.807
2 0.2354

0.4520
6,185.391
1 2029

1.3721

8.2856

13.2149

0.0612

5.3482

0.1227

5.4709

1.4433

0.1157

1.5589

0.0000
5,958.133
3 5,958.133
3 0.2335

0.4428
6,095.935
6 2030

1.3013

7.6079

12.8724

0.0605

5.3482

0.0718

5.4200

1.4433

0.0690

1.5122

0.0000
5,901.897
4 5,901.897
4 0.1736

0.4333
6,035.363
7 2031

1.2394

7.5439

12.5599

0.0594

5.3482

0.0706

5.4188

1.4433

0.0678

1.5111

0.0000
5,817.134
0 5,817.134
0 0.1712

0.4252
5,948.113
4 2032

1.1879

7.5210

12.3386

0.0587

5.3687

0.0697

5.4384

1.4488

0.0670

1.5158

0.0000
5,765.009
5 5,765.009
5 0.1697

0.4198
5,894.343
2 2033

1.1294

7.4207

12.0159

0.0574

5.3277

0.0681

5.3959

1.4377

0.0655

1.5033

0.0000
5,655.838
4 5,655.838
4 0.1665

0.4105
5,782.335
4 2034

1.0849

7.3817

11.8100

0.0567

5.3277

0.0671

5.3949

1.4377

0.0646

1.5024

0.0000
5,597.917
5 5,597.917
5 0.1649

0.4052
5,722.773
8 2035

1.0372

7.2753

11.6755

0.0563

5.3482

0.0590

5.4072

1.4433

0.0565

1.4998

0.0000
5,568.756
6 5,568.756
6 0.1629

0.4021
5,692.639
4 2036

0.5091

3.1325

5.6980

0.0235

2.0180

0.0375

2.0556

0.5445

0.0366

0.5811

0.0000
2,294.995
3 2,294.995
3 0.0689

0.1511
2,341.743
2 2037

78.8841

0.2819

1.8064

5.5700e-
003

0.6930

8.1200e-
003

0.7011

0.1842

7.9700e-
003

0.1921

0.0000
545.3233
545.3233

0.0101

9.4400e-
003
548.3892
2038

5.7690

0.0106

0.0993

3.5000e-
004

0.0505

2.1000e-
004

0.0507

0.0134

2.0000e-
004

0.0136

0.0000

34.8036

5.5000e-
004

6.9000e-
004

35.0222
Maximum

78.8841

8.7746

15.2637

0.0674

5.3687

0.1790

5.4770

1.4488

0.1647

1.5646

0.0000
6,442.941
2 6,442.941
2 0.2488

0.4899
6,595.141
9 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 6 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 1-28-2022
4-27-2022

0.9140

0.9140
2 4-28-2022
7-27-2022

0.9240

0.9240
3 7-28-2022
10-27-2022

0.9342

0.9342
4 10-28-2022
1-27-2023

1.1159

1.1159
5 1-28-2023
4-27-2023

0.9921

0.9921
6 4-28-2023
7-27-2023

1.2326

1.2326
7 7-28-2023
10-27-2023

1.2462

1.2462
8 10-28-2023
1-27-2024

1.2247

1.2247
9 1-28-2024
4-27-2024

1.1597

1.1597
10 4-28-2024
7-27-2024

1.6402

1.6402
11 7-28-2024
10-27-2024

2.6818

2.6818
12 10-28-2024
1-27-2025

2.7392

2.7392
13 1-28-2025
4-27-2025

2.5787

2.5787
14 4-28-2025
7-27-2025

2.5263

2.5263
15 7-28-2025
10-27-2025

2.5884

2.5884
16 10-28-2025
1-27-2026

2.6548

2.6548
17 1-28-2026
4-27-2026

2.5251

2.5251
18 4-28-2026
7-27-2026

2.4744

2.4744
19 7-28-2026
10-27-2026

2.5350

2.5350
20 10-28-2026
1-27-2027

2.6002

2.6002
21 1-28-2027
4-27-2027

2.4756

2.4756
22 4-28-2027
7-27-2027

2.4265

2.4265
23 7-28-2027
10-27-2027

2.4856

2.4856
24 10-28-2027
1-27-2028

2.5505

2.5505
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 7 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

25 1-28-2028
4-27-2028

2.4597

2.4597
26 4-28-2028
7-27-2028

2.3848

2.3848
27 7-28-2028
10-27-2028

2.4426

2.4426
28 10-28-2028
1-27-2029

2.5052

2.5052
29 1-28-2029
4-27-2029

2.3882

2.3882
30 4-28-2029
7-27-2029

2.3422

2.3422
31 7-28-2029
10-27-2029

2.3987

2.3987
32 10-28-2029
1-27-2030

2.4170

2.4170
33 1-28-2030
4-27-2030

2.2032

2.2032
34 4-28-2030
7-27-2030

2.1569

2.1569
35 7-28-2030
10-27-2030

2.2106

2.2106
36 10-28-2030
1-27-2031

2.2730

2.2730
37 1-28-2031
4-27-2031

2.1714

2.1714
38 4-28-2031
7-27-2031

2.1264

2.1264
39 7-28-2031
10-27-2031

2.1790

2.1790
40 10-28-2031
1-27-2032

2.2412

2.2412
41 1-28-2032
4-27-2032

2.1683

2.1683
42 4-28-2032
7-27-2032

2.1002

2.1002
43 7-28-2032
10-27-2032

2.1520

2.1520
44 10-28-2032
1-27-2033

2.2139

2.2139
45 1-28-2033
4-27-2033

2.1206

2.1206
46 4-28-2033
7-27-2033

2.0777

2.0777
47 7-28-2033
10-27-2033

2.1287

2.1287
48 10-28-2033
1-27-2034

2.1901

2.1901
49 1-28-2034
4-27-2034

2.0994

2.0994
50 4-28-2034
7-27-2034

2.0572

2.0572
51 7-28-2034
10-27-2034

2.1076

2.1076
52 10-28-2034
1-27-2035

2.1604

2.1604
53 1-28-2035
4-27-2035

2.0529

2.0529
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 8 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

54 4-28-2035
7-27-2035

2.0110

2.0110
55 7-28-2035
10-27-2035

2.0605

2.0605
56 10-28-2035
1-27-2036

2.1266

2.1266
57 1-28-2036
4-27-2036

2.0760

2.0760
58 4-28-2036
7-27-2036

0.5632

0.5632
59 7-28-2036
10-27-2036

0.2085

0.2085
60 10-28-2036
1-27-2037

0.2086

0.2086
61 1-28-2037
4-27-2037

10.8493

10.8493
62 4-28-2037
7-27-2037

25.0432

25.0432
63 7-28-2037
10-27-2037

25.3204

25.3204
64 10-28-2037
1-27-2038

23.6733

23.6733
Highest

25.3204

25.3204
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 9 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area
245.1456

4.4567
288.5475

0.4784

37.0631

37.0631
3,512.056
2 1,514.196
5 5,026.252
7 3.2805

0.2763
5,190.586
9 Energy

0.4499

4.0169

2.9017

0.0245

0.3108

0.0000
10,637.90
88 10,637.90
88 0.4691

0.1200
10,685.39
54 Mobile

36.3092

34.2330
316.2425

0.6295

78.7929

0.4479

79.2408

21.0260

0.4177

21.4437

0.0000
61,555.64
69 61,555.64
69 4.5881

2.8637
62,523.73
18 Waste

0.0000

0.0000
1,332.534
2 0.0000
1,332.534
2 78.7505

0.0000
3,301.297
0 Water

0.0000

0.0000
139.2369
1,298.776
3 1,438.013
2 14.3815

0.3457
1,900.580
5 Total
281.9046

42.7066
607.6917

1.1325

78.7929

37.8218
116.6147

21.0260

37.7916

58.8176
4,983.827
3 75,006.52
85 79,990.35
58 101.4697

3.6057
83,601.59
16 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 10 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area
245.1456

4.4567
288.5475

0.4784

37.0631

37.0631
3,512.056
2 1,514.196
5 5,026.252
7 3.2805

0.2763
5,190.586
9 Energy

0.4499

4.0169

2.9017

0.0245

0.3108

0.0000
10,637.90
88 10,637.90
88 0.4691

0.1200
10,685.39
54 Mobile

36.3092

34.2330
316.2425

0.6295

78.7929

0.4479

79.2408

21.0260

0.4177

21.4437

0.0000
61,555.64
69 61,555.64
69 4.5881

2.8637
62,523.73
18 Waste

0.0000

0.0000
1,332.534
2 0.0000
1,332.534
2 78.7505

0.0000
3,301.297
0 Water

0.0000

0.0000
139.2369
1,298.776
3 1,438.013
2 14.3815

0.3457
1,900.580
5 Total
281.9046

42.7066
607.6917

1.1325

78.7929

37.8218
116.6147

21.0260

37.7916

58.8176
4,983.827
3 75,006.52
85 79,990.35
58 101.4697

3.6057
83,601.59
16 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
1/28/2022
11/3/2022
5 200
2 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
11/4/2022
4/20/2023
5 120
3 Grading
Grading
4/21/2023
6/27/2024
5 310
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 11 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4 Building Construction
Building Construction
6/28/2024
5/15/2036
5 3100
5 Paving
Paving
5/16/2036
3/19/2037
5 220
6 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
3/20/2037
1/21/2038
5 220
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
1 8.00
81 0.73
Demolition
Excavators
3 8.00
158

0.38 Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158

0.38 Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367

0.48 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231

0.29 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132

0.36 Residential Indoor: 6,885,000; Residential Outdoor: 2,295,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 4,001,194; Non-Residential Outdoor: 1,333,731; Striped Parking Area: 65,340 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 180
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 930
Acres of Paving: 25
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 12 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.2639

2.5719

2.0594

3.8800e-
003

0.1243

0.1155

0.0000
339.9023
339.9023

0.0955

0.0000
342.2892
Total

0.2639

2.5719

2.0594

3.8800e-
003

0.1243

0.1155

0.0000
339.9023
339.9023

0.0955

0.0000
342.2892
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 6.00
78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 4,193.00
1,108.00

0.00 10.80

7.30 20.00
LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 839.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 13 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.3300e-
003

3.1400e-
003

0.0369

1.1000e-
004

0.0120

7.0000e-
005

0.0121

3.2000e-
003

6.0000e-
005

3.2600e-
003

0.0000

9.8925

3.1000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

9.9853
Total

4.3300e-
003

3.1400e-
003

0.0369

1.1000e-
004

0.0120

7.0000e-
005

0.0121

3.2000e-
003

6.0000e-
005

3.2600e-
003

0.0000

9.8925

3.1000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

9.9853
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.2639

2.5719

2.0594

3.8800e-
003

0.1243

0.1155

0.0000
339.9019
339.9019

0.0955

0.0000
342.2887
Total

0.2639

2.5719

2.0594

3.8800e-
003

0.1243

0.1155

0.0000
339.9019
339.9019

0.0955

0.0000
342.2887
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 14 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.3300e-
003

3.1400e-
003

0.0369

1.1000e-
004

0.0120

7.0000e-
005

0.0121

3.2000e-
003

6.0000e-
005

3.2600e-
003

0.0000

9.8925

3.1000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

9.9853
Total

4.3300e-
003

3.1400e-
003

0.0369

1.1000e-
004

0.0120

7.0000e-
005

0.0121

3.2000e-
003

6.0000e-
005

3.2600e-
003

0.0000

9.8925

3.1000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

9.9853
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.4658

0.0000

0.4658

0.2139

0.0000

0.2139

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0650

0.6782

0.4038

7.8000e-
004

0.0331

0.0304

0.0000

68.5508

0.0222

0.0000

69.1050
Total

0.0650

0.6782

0.4038

7.8000e-
004

0.4658

0.0331

0.4989

0.2139

0.0304

0.2443

0.0000

68.5508

0.0222

0.0000

69.1050
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 15 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.0700e-
003

7.7000e-
004

9.0700e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.9600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.9800e-
003

7.9000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.4336

8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.4564
Total

1.0700e-
003

7.7000e-
004

9.0700e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.9600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.9800e-
003

7.9000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.4336

8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.4564
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.4658

0.0000

0.4658

0.2139

0.0000

0.2139

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0650

0.6782

0.4038

7.8000e-
004

0.0331

0.0304

0.0000

68.5507

0.0222

0.0000

69.1049
Total

0.0650

0.6782

0.4038

7.8000e-
004

0.4658

0.0331

0.4989

0.2139

0.0304

0.2443

0.0000

68.5507

0.0222

0.0000

69.1049
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 16 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.0700e-
003

7.7000e-
004

9.0700e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.9600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.9800e-
003

7.9000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.4336

8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.4564
Total

1.0700e-
003

7.7000e-
004

9.0700e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.9600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.9800e-
003

7.9000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.4336

8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.4564
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.8091

0.0000

0.8091

0.4026

0.0000

0.4026

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.1051

1.0872

0.7207

1.5000e-
003

0.0500

0.0460

0.0000
132.1303
132.1303

0.0427

0.0000
133.1986
Total

0.1051

1.0872

0.7207

1.5000e-
003

0.8091

0.0500

0.8591

0.4026

0.0460

0.4486

0.0000
132.1303
132.1303

0.0427

0.0000
133.1986
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 17 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.9200e-
003

1.3300e-
003

0.0163

5.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
003

3.0000e-
005

5.7300e-
003

1.5200e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.5400e-
003

0.0000

4.5682

1.3000e-
004

4.6091
Total

1.9200e-
003

1.3300e-
003

0.0163

5.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
003

3.0000e-
005

5.7300e-
003

1.5200e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.5400e-
003

0.0000

4.5682

1.3000e-
004

4.6091
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.8091

0.0000

0.8091

0.4026

0.0000

0.4026

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.1051

1.0872

0.7207

1.5000e-
003

0.0500

0.0460

0.0000
132.1301
132.1301

0.0427

0.0000
133.1984
Total

0.1051

1.0872

0.7207

1.5000e-
003

0.8091

0.0500

0.8591

0.4026

0.0460

0.4486

0.0000
132.1301
132.1301

0.0427

0.0000
133.1984
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 18 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.9200e-
003

1.3300e-
003

0.0163

5.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
003

3.0000e-
005

5.7300e-
003

1.5200e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.5400e-
003

0.0000

4.5682

1.3000e-
004

4.6091
Total

1.9200e-
003

1.3300e-
003

0.0163

5.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
003

3.0000e-
005

5.7300e-
003

1.5200e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.5400e-
003

0.0000

4.5682

1.3000e-
004

4.6091
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

1.0381

0.0000

1.0381

0.3528

0.0000

0.3528

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.3006

3.1237

2.5386

5.6200e-
003

0.1289

0.1186

0.0000
493.5436
493.5436

0.1596

0.0000
497.5342
Total

0.3006

3.1237

2.5386

5.6200e-
003

1.0381

0.1289

1.1671

0.3528

0.1186

0.4714

0.0000
493.5436
493.5436

0.1596

0.0000
497.5342
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 19 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.9000e-
003

3.3900e-
003

0.0414

1.3000e-
004

0.0145

8.0000e-
005

0.0146

3.8600e-
003

7.0000e-
005

3.9300e-
003

0.0000

11.6293

3.4000e-
004

3.2000e-
004

11.7333
Total

4.9000e-
003

3.3900e-
003

0.0414

1.3000e-
004

0.0145

8.0000e-
005

0.0146

3.8600e-
003

7.0000e-
005

3.9300e-
003

0.0000

11.6293

3.4000e-
004

3.2000e-
004

11.7333
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

1.0381

0.0000

1.0381

0.3528

0.0000

0.3528

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.3006

3.1237

2.5386

5.6200e-
003

0.1289

0.1186

0.0000
493.5431
493.5431

0.1596

0.0000
497.5336
Total

0.3006

3.1237

2.5386

5.6200e-
003

1.0381

0.1289

1.1671

0.3528

0.1186

0.4714

0.0000
493.5431
493.5431

0.1596

0.0000
497.5336
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 20 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.9000e-
003

3.3900e-
003

0.0414

1.3000e-
004

0.0145

8.0000e-
005

0.0146

3.8600e-
003

7.0000e-
005

3.9300e-
003

0.0000

11.6293

3.4000e-
004

3.2000e-
004

11.7333
Total

4.9000e-
003

3.3900e-
003

0.0414

1.3000e-
004

0.0145

8.0000e-
005

0.0146

3.8600e-
003

7.0000e-
005

3.9300e-
003

0.0000

11.6293

3.4000e-
004

3.2000e-
004

11.7333
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.8816

0.0000

0.8816

0.2668

0.0000

0.2668

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.2076

2.0883

1.7881

4.0000e-
003

0.0861

0.0792

0.0000
351.6509
351.6509

0.1137

0.0000
354.4942
Total

0.2076

2.0883

1.7881

4.0000e-
003

0.8816

0.0861

0.9677

0.2668

0.0792

0.3460

0.0000
351.6509
351.6509

0.1137

0.0000
354.4942
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 21 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

3.2800e-
003

2.1700e-
003

0.0276

9.0000e-
005

0.0103

5.0000e-
005

0.0104

2.7500e-
003

5.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

0.0000

8.0806

2.2000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

8.1497
Total

3.2800e-
003

2.1700e-
003

0.0276

9.0000e-
005

0.0103

5.0000e-
005

0.0104

2.7500e-
003

5.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

0.0000

8.0806

2.2000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

8.1497
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust

0.8816

0.0000

0.8816

0.2668

0.0000

0.2668

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.2076

2.0883

1.7881

4.0000e-
003

0.0861

0.0792

0.0000
351.6505
351.6505

0.1137

0.0000
354.4938
Total

0.2076

2.0883

1.7881

4.0000e-
003

0.8816

0.0861

0.9677

0.2668

0.0792

0.3460

0.0000
351.6505
351.6505

0.1137

0.0000
354.4938
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 22 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

3.2800e-
003

2.1700e-
003

0.0276

9.0000e-
005

0.0103

5.0000e-
005

0.0104

2.7500e-
003

5.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

0.0000

8.0806

2.2000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

8.1497
Total

3.2800e-
003

2.1700e-
003

0.0276

9.0000e-
005

0.0103

5.0000e-
005

0.0104

2.7500e-
003

5.0000e-
005

2.8000e-
003

0.0000

8.0806

2.2000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

8.1497
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0979

0.8940

1.0751

1.7900e-
003

0.0408

0.0384

0.0000
154.1797
154.1797

0.0365

0.0000
155.0911
Total

0.0979

0.8940

1.0751

1.7900e-
003

0.0408

0.0384

0.0000
154.1797
154.1797

0.0365

0.0000
155.0911
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 23 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0832

3.2488

1.1270

0.0148

0.4893

0.0194

0.5087

0.1413

0.0185

0.1598

0.0000
1,452.681
1 1,452.681
1 0.0457

0.2105
1,516.543
0 Worker

0.7092

0.4697

5.9628

0.0187

2.2360

0.0118

2.2478

0.5942

0.0108

0.6050

0.0000
1,746.628
2 1,746.628
2 0.0478

0.0461
1,761.568
1 Total

0.7924

3.7185

7.0898

0.0335

2.7253

0.0311

2.7564

0.7355

0.0293

0.7648

0.0000
3,199.309
3 3,199.309
3 0.0935

0.2566
3,278.111
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0979

0.8940

1.0751

1.7900e-
003

0.0408

0.0384

0.0000
154.1795
154.1795

0.0365

0.0000
155.0910
Total

0.0979

0.8940

1.0751

1.7900e-
003

0.0408

0.0384

0.0000
154.1795
154.1795

0.0365

0.0000
155.0910
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 24 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0832

3.2488

1.1270

0.0148

0.4893

0.0194

0.5087

0.1413

0.0185

0.1598

0.0000
1,452.681
1 1,452.681
1 0.0457

0.2105
1,516.543
0 Worker

0.7092

0.4697

5.9628

0.0187

2.2360

0.0118

2.2478

0.5942

0.0108

0.6050

0.0000
1,746.628
2 1,746.628
2 0.0478

0.0461
1,761.568
1 Total

0.7924

3.7185

7.0898

0.0335

2.7253

0.0311

2.7564

0.7355

0.0293

0.7648

0.0000
3,199.309
3 3,199.309
3 0.0935

0.2566
3,278.111
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1785

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6549
302.6549

0.0711

0.0000
304.4335
Total

0.1785

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6549
302.6549

0.0711

0.0000
304.4335
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 25 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1582

6.3127

2.1750

0.0285

0.9602

0.0379

0.9981

0.2772

0.0363

0.3135

0.0000
2,796.409
5 2,796.409
5 0.0920

0.4049
2,919.377
5 Worker

1.3120

0.8345

10.9897

0.0354

4.3880

0.0221

4.4101

1.1660

0.0203

1.1863

0.0000
3,343.877
2 3,343.877
2 0.0856

0.0849
3,371.331
2 Total

1.4702

7.1473

13.1647

0.0639

5.3482

0.0600

5.4081

1.4433

0.0566

1.4998

0.0000
6,140.286
7 6,140.286
7 0.1776

0.4899
6,290.708
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1784

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6545
302.6545

0.0711

0.0000
304.4331
Total

0.1784

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6545
302.6545

0.0711

0.0000
304.4331
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 26 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2025
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1582

6.3127

2.1750

0.0285

0.9602

0.0379

0.9981

0.2772

0.0363

0.3135

0.0000
2,796.409
5 2,796.409
5 0.0920

0.4049
2,919.377
5 Worker

1.3120

0.8345

10.9897

0.0354

4.3880

0.0221

4.4101

1.1660

0.0203

1.1863

0.0000
3,343.877
2 3,343.877
2 0.0856

0.0849
3,371.331
2 Total

1.4702

7.1473

13.1647

0.0639

5.3482

0.0600

5.4081

1.4433

0.0566

1.4998

0.0000
6,140.286
7 6,140.286
7 0.1776

0.4899
6,290.708
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1785

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6549
302.6549

0.0711

0.0000
304.4335
Total

0.1785

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6549
302.6549

0.0711

0.0000
304.4335
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 27 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1538

6.2449

2.1485

0.0279

0.9602

0.0376

0.9978

0.2772

0.0360

0.3132

0.0000
2,743.023
2 2,743.023
2 0.0943

0.3970
2,863.691
3 Worker

1.2409

0.7619

10.3795

0.0343

4.3880

0.0210

4.4090

1.1660

0.0194

1.1854

0.0000
3,265.926
8 3,265.926
8 0.0784

0.0803
3,291.813
6 Total

1.3947

7.0068

12.5280

0.0622

5.3482

0.0586

5.4068

1.4433

0.0553

1.4986

0.0000
6,008.950
0 6,008.950
0 0.1727

0.4773
6,155.504
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1784

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6545
302.6545

0.0711

0.0000
304.4331
Total

0.1784

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6545
302.6545

0.0711

0.0000
304.4331
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 28 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2026
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1538

6.2449

2.1485

0.0279

0.9602

0.0376

0.9978

0.2772

0.0360

0.3132

0.0000
2,743.023
2 2,743.023
2 0.0943

0.3970
2,863.691
3 Worker

1.2409

0.7619

10.3795

0.0343

4.3880

0.0210

4.4090

1.1660

0.0194

1.1854

0.0000
3,265.926
8 3,265.926
8 0.0784

0.0803
3,291.813
6 Total

1.3947

7.0068

12.5280

0.0622

5.3482

0.0586

5.4068

1.4433

0.0553

1.4986

0.0000
6,008.950
0 6,008.950
0 0.1727

0.4773
6,155.504
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2027
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1785

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6549
302.6549

0.0711

0.0000
304.4335
Total

0.1785

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6549
302.6549

0.0711

0.0000
304.4335
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 29 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2027
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1502

6.1782

2.1270

0.0273

0.9602

0.0373

0.9975

0.2772

0.0357

0.3129

0.0000
2,686.311
5 2,686.311
5 0.0964

0.3887
2,804.562
7 Worker

1.1741

0.6996

9.8535

0.0333

4.3880

0.0198

4.4078

1.1660

0.0182

1.1842

0.0000
3,195.367
8 3,195.367
8 0.0721

0.0763
3,219.917
3 Total

1.3243

6.8779

11.9805

0.0606

5.3482

0.0571

5.4053

1.4433

0.0539

1.4971

0.0000
5,881.679
3 5,881.679
3 0.1685

0.4651
6,024.480
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1784

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6545
302.6545

0.0711

0.0000
304.4331
Total

0.1784

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6545
302.6545

0.0711

0.0000
304.4331
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 30 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2027
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1502

6.1782

2.1270

0.0273

0.9602

0.0373

0.9975

0.2772

0.0357

0.3129

0.0000
2,686.311
5 2,686.311
5 0.0964

0.3887
2,804.562
7 Worker

1.1741

0.6996

9.8535

0.0333

4.3880

0.0198

4.4078

1.1660

0.0182

1.1842

0.0000
3,195.367
8 3,195.367
8 0.0721

0.0763
3,219.917
3 Total

1.3243

6.8779

11.9805

0.0606

5.3482

0.0571

5.4053

1.4433

0.0539

1.4971

0.0000
5,881.679
3 5,881.679
3 0.1685

0.4651
6,024.480
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2028
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1778

1.6211

2.0910

3.5000e-
003

0.0686

0.0645

0.0000
301.4953
301.4953

0.0709

0.0000
303.2671
Total

0.1778

1.6211

2.0910

3.5000e-
003

0.0686

0.0645

0.0000
301.4953
301.4953

0.0709

0.0000
303.2671
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 31 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2028
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1467

6.1002

2.1057

0.0266

0.9565

0.0368

0.9934

0.2762

0.0352

0.3114

0.0000
2,622.454
0 2,622.454
0 0.0982

0.3793
2,737.942
8 Worker

1.1069

0.6443

9.3732

0.0323

4.3712

0.0184

4.3896

1.1616

0.0170

1.1785

0.0000
3,120.858
2 3,120.858
2 0.0664

0.0727
3,144.181
6 Total

1.2536

6.7445

11.4788

0.0589

5.3277

0.0553

5.3830

1.4377

0.0522

1.4899

0.0000
5,743.312
2 5,743.312
2 0.1645

0.4520
5,882.124
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1778

1.6211

2.0910

3.5000e-
003

0.0686

0.0645

0.0000
301.4949
301.4949

0.0709

0.0000
303.2667
Total

0.1778

1.6211

2.0910

3.5000e-
003

0.0686

0.0645

0.0000
301.4949
301.4949

0.0709

0.0000
303.2667
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 32 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2028
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1467

6.1002

2.1057

0.0266

0.9565

0.0368

0.9934

0.2762

0.0352

0.3114

0.0000
2,622.454
0 2,622.454
0 0.0982

0.3793
2,737.942
8 Worker

1.1069

0.6443

9.3732

0.0323

4.3712

0.0184

4.3896

1.1616

0.0170

1.1785

0.0000
3,120.858
2 3,120.858
2 0.0664

0.0727
3,144.181
6 Total

1.2536

6.7445

11.4788

0.0589

5.3277

0.0553

5.3830

1.4377

0.0522

1.4899

0.0000
5,743.312
2 5,743.312
2 0.1645

0.4520
5,882.124
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2029
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1785

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6549
302.6549

0.0711

0.0000
304.4335
Total

0.1785

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6549
302.6549

0.0711

0.0000
304.4335
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 33 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2029
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1446

6.0578

2.1016

0.0261

0.9602

0.0366

0.9968

0.2773

0.0350

0.3123

0.0000
2,578.474
8 2,578.474
8 0.1007

0.3728
2,692.070
4 Worker

1.0490

0.6005

9.0142

0.0316

4.3880

0.0173

4.4053

1.1660

0.0159

1.1819

0.0000
3,077.003
9 3,077.003
9 0.0617

0.0701
3,099.432
1 Total

1.1936

6.6583

11.1158

0.0577

5.3482

0.0539

5.4021

1.4433

0.0509

1.4942

0.0000
5,655.478
7 5,655.478
7 0.1623

0.4428
5,791.502
5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1784

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6545
302.6545

0.0711

0.0000
304.4331
Total

0.1784

1.6273

2.0991

3.5200e-
003

0.0689

0.0648

0.0000
302.6545
302.6545

0.0711

0.0000
304.4331
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 34 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2029
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1446

6.0578

2.1016

0.0261

0.9602

0.0366

0.9968

0.2773

0.0350

0.3123

0.0000
2,578.474
8 2,578.474
8 0.1007

0.3728
2,692.070
4 Worker

1.0490

0.6005

9.0142

0.0316

4.3880

0.0173

4.4053

1.1660

0.0159

1.1819

0.0000
3,077.003
9 3,077.003
9 0.0617

0.0701
3,099.432
1 Total

1.1936

6.6583

11.1158

0.0577

5.3482

0.0539

5.4021

1.4433

0.0509

1.4942

0.0000
5,655.478
7 5,655.478
7 0.1623

0.4428
5,791.502
5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2030
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1708

1.0355

2.1085

4.0400e-
003

0.0193

0.0000
343.0336
343.0336

0.0138

0.0000
343.3777
Total

0.1708

1.0355

2.1085

4.0400e-
003

0.0193

0.0000
343.0336
343.0336

0.0138

0.0000
343.3777
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 35 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2030
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1425

6.0130

2.0947

0.0256

0.9602

0.0363

0.9966

0.2773

0.0348

0.3120

0.0000
2,530.920
9 2,530.920
9 0.1026

0.3657
2,642.474
4 Worker

0.9880

0.5594

8.6692

0.0309

4.3880

0.0162

4.4041

1.1660

0.0149

1.1809

0.0000
3,027.943
3 3,027.943
3 0.0572

0.0676
3,049.512
0 Total

1.1305

6.5724

10.7639

0.0565

5.3482

0.0525

5.4007

1.4433

0.0496

1.4929

0.0000
5,558.864
2 5,558.864
2 0.1599

0.4333
5,691.986
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1708

1.0355

2.1085

4.0400e-
003

0.0193

0.0000
343.0332
343.0332

0.0138

0.0000
343.3773
Total

0.1708

1.0355

2.1085

4.0400e-
003

0.0193

0.0000
343.0332
343.0332

0.0138

0.0000
343.3773
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 36 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2030
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1425

6.0130

2.0947

0.0256

0.9602

0.0363

0.9966

0.2773

0.0348

0.3120

0.0000
2,530.920
9 2,530.920
9 0.1026

0.3657
2,642.474
4 Worker

0.9880

0.5594

8.6692

0.0309

4.3880

0.0162

4.4041

1.1660

0.0149

1.1809

0.0000
3,027.943
3 3,027.943
3 0.0572

0.0676
3,049.512
0 Total

1.1305

6.5724

10.7639

0.0565

5.3482

0.0525

5.4007

1.4433

0.0496

1.4929

0.0000
5,558.864
2 5,558.864
2 0.1599

0.4333
5,691.986
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2031
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1708

1.0355

2.1085

4.0400e-
003

0.0193

0.0000
343.0336
343.0336

0.0138

0.0000
343.3777
Total

0.1708

1.0355

2.1085

4.0400e-
003

0.0193

0.0000
343.0336
343.0336

0.0138

0.0000
343.3777
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 37 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2031
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1409

5.9858

2.0917

0.0252

0.9602

0.0361

0.9964

0.2773

0.0346

0.3118

0.0000
2,489.698
9 2,489.698
9 0.1042

0.3598
2,599.519
3 Worker

0.9277

0.5226

8.3597

0.0302

4.3880

0.0151

4.4031

1.1660

0.0139

1.1799

0.0000
2,984.401
9 2,984.401
9 0.0532

0.0654
3,005.216
8 Total

1.0686

6.5084

10.4514

0.0554

5.3482

0.0512

5.3994

1.4433

0.0485

1.4917

0.0000
5,474.100
8 5,474.100
8 0.1574

0.4252
5,604.736
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1708

1.0355

2.1085

4.0400e-
003

0.0193

0.0000
343.0332
343.0332

0.0138

0.0000
343.3773
Total

0.1708

1.0355

2.1085

4.0400e-
003

0.0193

0.0000
343.0332
343.0332

0.0138

0.0000
343.3773
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 38 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2031
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1409

5.9858

2.0917

0.0252

0.9602

0.0361

0.9964

0.2773

0.0346

0.3118

0.0000
2,489.698
9 2,489.698
9 0.1042

0.3598
2,599.519
3 Worker

0.9277

0.5226

8.3597

0.0302

4.3880

0.0151

4.4031

1.1660

0.0139

1.1799

0.0000
2,984.401
9 2,984.401
9 0.0532

0.0654
3,005.216
8 Total

1.0686

6.5084

10.4514

0.0554

5.3482

0.0512

5.3994

1.4433

0.0485

1.4917

0.0000
5,474.100
8 5,474.100
8 0.1574

0.4252
5,604.736
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2032
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1715

1.0394

2.1166

4.0600e-
003

0.0194

0.0000
344.3479
344.3479

0.0138

0.0000
344.6933
Total

0.1715

1.0394

2.1166

4.0600e-
003

0.0194

0.0000
344.3479
344.3479

0.0138

0.0000
344.6933
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 39 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2032
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1402

5.9880

2.1006

0.0249

0.9639

0.0361

1.0000

0.2783

0.0345

0.3128

0.0000
2,462.994
1 2,462.994
1 0.1060

0.3560
2,571.725
1 Worker

0.8763

0.4936

8.1215

0.0298

4.4048

0.0142

4.4190

1.1705

0.0131

1.1836

0.0000
2,957.667
8 2,957.667
8 0.0499

0.0638
2,977.925
3 Total

1.0164

6.4816

10.2220

0.0547

5.3687

0.0503

5.4190

1.4488

0.0476

1.4964

0.0000
5,420.662
0 5,420.662
0 0.1558

0.4198
5,549.650
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1715

1.0394

2.1166

4.0600e-
003

0.0194

0.0000
344.3475
344.3475

0.0138

0.0000
344.6929
Total

0.1715

1.0394

2.1166

4.0600e-
003

0.0194

0.0000
344.3475
344.3475

0.0138

0.0000
344.6929
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 40 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2032
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1402

5.9880

2.1006

0.0249

0.9639

0.0361

1.0000

0.2783

0.0345

0.3128

0.0000
2,462.994
1 2,462.994
1 0.1060

0.3560
2,571.725
1 Worker

0.8763

0.4936

8.1215

0.0298

4.4048

0.0142

4.4190

1.1705

0.0131

1.1836

0.0000
2,957.667
8 2,957.667
8 0.0499

0.0638
2,977.925
3 Total

1.0164

6.4816

10.2220

0.0547

5.3687

0.0503

5.4190

1.4488

0.0476

1.4964

0.0000
5,420.662
0 5,420.662
0 0.1558

0.4198
5,549.650
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2033
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1702

1.0315

2.1004

4.0200e-
003

0.0193

0.0000
341.7193
341.7193

0.0137

0.0000
342.0621
Total

0.1702

1.0315

2.1004

4.0200e-
003

0.0193

0.0000
341.7193
341.7193

0.0137

0.0000
342.0621
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 41 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2033
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1383

5.9247

2.0881

0.0244

0.9566

0.0357

0.9922

0.2762

0.0341

0.3103

0.0000
2,412.057
7 2,412.057
7 0.1065

0.3487
2,518.635
4 Worker

0.8209

0.4645

7.8274

0.0291

4.3712

0.0132

4.3844

1.1616

0.0122

1.1737

0.0000
2,902.061
8 2,902.061
8 0.0464

0.0618
2,921.638
4 Total

0.9592

6.3892

9.9155

0.0534

5.3277

0.0489

5.3766

1.4377

0.0463

1.4840

0.0000
5,314.119
5 5,314.119
5 0.1528

0.4105
5,440.273
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1702

1.0315

2.1004

4.0200e-
003

0.0193

0.0000
341.7189
341.7189

0.0137

0.0000
342.0617
Total

0.1702

1.0315

2.1004

4.0200e-
003

0.0193

0.0000
341.7189
341.7189

0.0137

0.0000
342.0617
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 42 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2033
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1383

5.9247

2.0881

0.0244

0.9566

0.0357

0.9922

0.2762

0.0341

0.3103

0.0000
2,412.057
7 2,412.057
7 0.1065

0.3487
2,518.635
4 Worker

0.8209

0.4645

7.8274

0.0291

4.3712

0.0132

4.3844

1.1616

0.0122

1.1737

0.0000
2,902.061
8 2,902.061
8 0.0464

0.0618
2,921.638
4 Total

0.9592

6.3892

9.9155

0.0534

5.3277

0.0489

5.3766

1.4377

0.0463

1.4840

0.0000
5,314.119
5 5,314.119
5 0.1528

0.4105
5,440.273
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2034
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1702

1.0315

2.1004

4.0200e-
003

0.0193

0.0000
341.7193
341.7193

0.0137

0.0000
342.0621
Total

0.1702

1.0315

2.1004

4.0200e-
003

0.0193

0.0000
341.7193
341.7193

0.0137

0.0000
342.0621
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 43 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2034
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1377

5.9069

2.0923

0.0240

0.9566

0.0355

0.9920

0.2762

0.0339

0.3101

0.0000
2,382.874
0 2,382.874
0 0.1076

0.3446
2,488.256
4 Worker

0.7770

0.4433

7.6173

0.0286

4.3712

0.0124

4.3836

1.1616

0.0114

1.1730

0.0000
2,873.324
6 2,873.324
6 0.0436

0.0605
2,892.455
8 Total

0.9147

6.3502

9.7096

0.0527

5.3277

0.0479

5.3756

1.4378

0.0454

1.4831

0.0000
5,256.198
6 5,256.198
6 0.1511

0.4052
5,380.712
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1702

1.0315

2.1004

4.0200e-
003

0.0193

0.0000
341.7189
341.7189

0.0137

0.0000
342.0617
Total

0.1702

1.0315

2.1004

4.0200e-
003

0.0193

0.0000
341.7189
341.7189

0.0137

0.0000
342.0617
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 44 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2034
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1377

5.9069

2.0923

0.0240

0.9566

0.0355

0.9920

0.2762

0.0339

0.3101

0.0000
2,382.874
0 2,382.874
0 0.1076

0.3446
2,488.256
4 Worker

0.7770

0.4433

7.6173

0.0286

4.3712

0.0124

4.3836

1.1616

0.0114

1.1730

0.0000
2,873.324
6 2,873.324
6 0.0436

0.0605
2,892.455
8 Total

0.9147

6.3502

9.7096

0.0527

5.3277

0.0479

5.3756

1.4378

0.0454

1.4831

0.0000
5,256.198
6 5,256.198
6 0.1511

0.4052
5,380.712
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2035
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1588

0.9346

2.1034

4.0400e-
003

0.0118

0.0000
343.0336
343.0336

0.0128

0.0000
343.3530
Total

0.1588

0.9346

2.1034

4.0400e-
003

0.0118

0.0000
343.0336
343.0336

0.0128

0.0000
343.3530
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 45 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2035
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1377

5.9120

2.1039

0.0239

0.9603

0.0354

0.9957

0.2773

0.0339

0.3111

0.0000
2,365.772
0 2,365.772
0 0.1088

0.3423
2,470.486
3 Worker

0.7407

0.4287

7.4683

0.0284

4.3880

0.0118

4.3997

1.1660

0.0108

1.1768

0.0000
2,859.951
4 2,859.951
4 0.0413

0.0598
2,878.800
5 Total

0.8784

6.3407

9.5722

0.0522

5.3482

0.0472

5.3954

1.4433

0.0447

1.4880

0.0000
5,225.723
4 5,225.723
4 0.1501

0.4021
5,349.286
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.1588

0.9346

2.1034

4.0400e-
003

0.0118

0.0000
343.0332
343.0332

0.0128

0.0000
343.3526
Total

0.1588

0.9346

2.1034

4.0400e-
003

0.0118

0.0000
343.0332
343.0332

0.0128

0.0000
343.3526
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 46 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2035
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.1377

5.9120

2.1039

0.0239

0.9603

0.0354

0.9957

0.2773

0.0339

0.3111

0.0000
2,365.772
0 2,365.772
0 0.1088

0.3423
2,470.486
3 Worker

0.7407

0.4287

7.4683

0.0284

4.3880

0.0118

4.3997

1.1660

0.0108

1.1768

0.0000
2,859.951
4 2,859.951
4 0.0413

0.0598
2,878.800
5 Total

0.8784

6.3407

9.5722

0.0522

5.3482

0.0472

5.3954

1.4433

0.0447

1.4880

0.0000
5,225.723
4 5,225.723
4 0.1501

0.4021
5,349.286
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2036
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0596

0.3509

0.7898

1.5200e-
003

4.4300e-
003

0.0000
128.8019
128.8019

4.8000e-
003

0.0000
128.9218
Total

0.0596

0.3509

0.7898

1.5200e-
003

4.4300e-
003

0.0000
128.8019
128.8019

4.8000e-
003

0.0000
128.9218
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 47 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2036
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0517

2.2198

0.7900

8.9600e-
003

0.3606

0.0133

0.3739

0.1041

0.0127

0.1168

0.0000
888.2975
888.2975

0.0409

0.1285
927.6155
Worker

0.2781

0.1610

2.8042

0.0107

1.6476

4.4100e-
003

1.6520

0.4378

4.0600e-
003

0.4419

0.0000
1,073.851
5 1,073.851
5 0.0155

0.0225
1,080.928
9 Total

0.3298

2.3808

3.5942

0.0196

2.0082

0.0177

2.0259

0.5419

0.0168

0.5587

0.0000
1,962.149
0 1,962.149
0 0.0564

0.1510
2,008.544
5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0596

0.3509

0.7898

1.5200e-
003

4.4300e-
003

0.0000
128.8018
128.8018

4.8000e-
003

0.0000
128.9217
Total

0.0596

0.3509

0.7898

1.5200e-
003

4.4300e-
003

0.0000
128.8018
128.8018

4.8000e-
003

0.0000
128.9217
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 48 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.5 Building Construction - 2036
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0517

2.2198

0.7900

8.9600e-
003

0.3606

0.0133

0.3739

0.1041

0.0127

0.1168

0.0000
888.2975
888.2975

0.0409

0.1285
927.6155
Worker

0.2781

0.1610

2.8042

0.0107

1.6476

4.4100e-
003

1.6520

0.4378

4.0600e-
003

0.4419

0.0000
1,073.851
5 1,073.851
5 0.0155

0.0225
1,080.928
9 Total

0.3298

2.3808

3.5942

0.0196

2.0082

0.0177

2.0259

0.5419

0.0168

0.5587

0.0000
1,962.149
0 1,962.149
0 0.0564

0.1510
2,008.544
5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2036
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0935

0.3998

1.2973

2.3000e-
003

0.0154

0.0000
197.6160
197.6160

7.6100e-
003

0.0000
197.8062
Paving

0.0244

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.1179

0.3998

1.2973

2.3000e-
003

0.0154

0.0000
197.6160
197.6160

7.6100e-
003

0.0000
197.8062
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 49 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2036
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.6700e-
003

9.6000e-
004

0.0168

6.0000e-
005

9.8600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

9.8900e-
003

2.6200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.6500e-
003

0.0000

6.4288

9.0000e-
005

1.3000e-
004

6.4712
Total

1.6700e-
003

9.6000e-
004

0.0168

6.0000e-
005

9.8600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

9.8900e-
003

2.6200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.6500e-
003

0.0000

6.4288

9.0000e-
005

1.3000e-
004

6.4712
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0935

0.3998

1.2973

2.3000e-
003

0.0154

0.0000
197.6158
197.6158

7.6100e-
003

0.0000
197.8059
Paving

0.0244

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.1179

0.3998

1.2973

2.3000e-
003

0.0154

0.0000
197.6158
197.6158

7.6100e-
003

0.0000
197.8059
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 50 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2036
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.6700e-
003

9.6000e-
004

0.0168

6.0000e-
005

9.8600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

9.8900e-
003

2.6200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.6500e-
003

0.0000

6.4288

9.0000e-
005

1.3000e-
004

6.4712
Total

1.6700e-
003

9.6000e-
004

0.0168

6.0000e-
005

9.8600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

9.8900e-
003

2.6200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.6500e-
003

0.0000

6.4288

9.0000e-
005

1.3000e-
004

6.4712
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2037
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0319

0.1365

0.4430

7.9000e-
004

5.2500e-
003

0.0000

67.4786

2.6000e-
003

0.0000

67.5436
Paving

8.3400e-
003

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.0403

0.1365

0.4430

7.9000e-
004

5.2500e-
003

0.0000

67.4786

2.6000e-
003

0.0000

67.5436
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 51 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2037
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

5.7000e-
004

3.3000e-
004

5.7300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

3.3700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.3800e-
003

8.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.1952

3.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

2.2097
Total

5.7000e-
004

3.3000e-
004

5.7300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

3.3700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.3800e-
003

8.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.1952

3.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

2.2097
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.0319

0.1365

0.4430

7.9000e-
004

5.2500e-
003

0.0000

67.4786

2.6000e-
003

0.0000

67.5435
Paving

8.3400e-
003

0.0000

0.0000
Total

0.0403

0.1365

0.4430

7.9000e-
004

5.2500e-
003

0.0000

67.4786

2.6000e-
003

0.0000

67.5435
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 52 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.6 Paving - 2037
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

5.7000e-
004

3.3000e-
004

5.7300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

3.3700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.3800e-
003

8.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.1952

3.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

2.2097
Total

5.7000e-
004

3.3000e-
004

5.7300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

3.3700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

3.3800e-
003

8.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.1952

3.0000e-
005

5.0000e-
005

2.2097
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2037
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

78.7148

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0121

0.0777

0.1839

3.0000e-
004

1.0200e-
003

0.0000

26.1709

9.7000e-
004

0.0000

26.1950
Total

78.7269

0.0777

0.1839

3.0000e-
004

1.0200e-
003

0.0000

26.1709

9.7000e-
004

0.0000

26.1950
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 53 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2037
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.1164

0.0674

1.1737

4.4600e-
003

0.6896

1.8500e-
003

0.6915

0.1833

1.7000e-
003

0.1850

0.0000
449.4787
449.4787

6.4900e-
003

9.4000e-
003
452.4411
Total

0.1164

0.0674

1.1737

4.4600e-
003

0.6896

1.8500e-
003

0.6915

0.1833

1.7000e-
003

0.1850

0.0000
449.4787
449.4787

6.4900e-
003

9.4000e-
003
452.4411
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

78.7148

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0121

0.0777

0.1839

3.0000e-
004

1.0200e-
003

0.0000

26.1708

9.7000e-
004

0.0000

26.1950
Total

78.7269

0.0777

0.1839

3.0000e-
004

1.0200e-
003

0.0000

26.1708

9.7000e-
004

0.0000

26.1950
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 54 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2037
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

0.1164

0.0674

1.1737

4.4600e-
003

0.6896

1.8500e-
003

0.6915

0.1833

1.7000e-
003

0.1850

0.0000
449.4787
449.4787

6.4900e-
003

9.4000e-
003
452.4411
Total

0.1164

0.0674

1.1737

4.4600e-
003

0.6896

1.8500e-
003

0.6915

0.1833

1.7000e-
003

0.1850

0.0000
449.4787
449.4787

6.4900e-
003

9.4000e-
003
452.4411
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2038
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

5.7596

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

8.8000e-
004

5.6800e-
003

0.0135

2.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.9149

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.9167
Total

5.7605

5.6800e-
003

0.0135

2.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.9149

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.9167
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 55 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2038
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

8.5200e-
003

4.9300e-
003

0.0859

3.3000e-
004

0.0505

1.4000e-
004

0.0506

0.0134

1.2000e-
004

0.0135

0.0000

32.8887

4.7000e-
004

6.9000e-
004

33.1054
Total

8.5200e-
003

4.9300e-
003

0.0859

3.3000e-
004

0.0505

1.4000e-
004

0.0506

0.0134

1.2000e-
004

0.0135

0.0000

32.8887

4.7000e-
004

6.9000e-
004

33.1054
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating

5.7596

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

8.8000e-
004

5.6800e-
003

0.0135

2.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.9149

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.9167
Total

5.7605

5.6800e-
003

0.0135

2.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.9149

7.0000e-
005

0.0000

1.9167
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 56 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2038
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

8.5200e-
003

4.9300e-
003

0.0859

3.3000e-
004

0.0505

1.4000e-
004

0.0506

0.0134

1.2000e-
004

0.0135

0.0000

32.8887

4.7000e-
004

6.9000e-
004

33.1054
Total

8.5200e-
003

4.9300e-
003

0.0859

3.3000e-
004

0.0505

1.4000e-
004

0.0506

0.0134

1.2000e-
004

0.0135

0.0000

32.8887

4.7000e-
004

6.9000e-
004

33.1054
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 57 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated

36.3092

34.2330
316.2425

0.6295

78.7929

0.4479

79.2408

21.0260

0.4177

21.4437

0.0000
61,555.64
69 61,555.64
69 4.5881

2.8637
62,523.73
18 Unmitigated

36.3092

34.2330
316.2425

0.6295

78.7929

0.4479

79.2408

21.0260

0.4177

21.4437

0.0000
61,555.64
69 61,555.64
69 4.5881

2.8637
62,523.73
18 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise
20,400.00
20,400.00
20400.00
58,248,189
58,248,189
City Park

0.00 0.00

0.00 Elementary School
1,360.00

0.00 0.00
2,141,941
2,141,941
General Office Building
10,846.00
10,846.00
10846.00
25,919,259
25,919,259
Government (Civic Center)
114.40
114.40
114.40
218,691
218,691
Hotel
4,500.00
4,500.00
4500.00
8,549,688
8,549,688
Medical Office Building
15,000.00
15,000.00
15000.00
29,358,748
29,358,748
Other Asphalt Surfaces

0.00 0.00

0.00 Strip Mall
56,000.00
56,000.00
56000.00
86,241,850
86,241,850
Total
108,220.40
106,860.40
106,860.40
210,678,366
210,678,366
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Apartments Mid Rise

10.80 7.30

7.50 41.60

18.80 39.60
86 11
3 City Park

9.50 7.30

7.30 33.00

48.00 19.00
66 28
6 Elementary School

9.50 7.30

7.30 65.00

30.00 5.00
63 25
12 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 58 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
General Office Building

9.50 7.30

7.30 33.00

48.00 19.00
77 19
4 Government (Civic Center)

9.50 7.30

7.30 75.00

20.00 5.00
50 34
16 Hotel

9.50 7.30

7.30 19.40

61.60 19.00
58 38
4 Medical Office Building

9.50 7.30

7.30 29.60

51.40 19.00
60 30
10 Other Asphalt Surfaces

9.50 7.30

7.30 0.00

0.00 0.00
0 0
0 Strip Mall

9.50 7.30

7.30 16.60

64.40 19.00
45 40
15 4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Mid Rise

0.575453

0.061728

0.171227

0.112384

0.022882

0.006522

0.009800

0.006298

0.000679

0.000623

0.027611

0.000857

0.003936
City Park

0.575453

0.061728

0.171227

0.112384

0.022882

0.006522

0.009800

0.006298

0.000679

0.000623

0.027611

0.000857

0.003936
Elementary School

0.575453

0.061728

0.171227

0.112384

0.022882

0.006522

0.009800

0.006298

0.000679

0.000623

0.027611

0.000857

0.003936
General Office Building

0.575453

0.061728

0.171227

0.112384

0.022882

0.006522

0.009800

0.006298

0.000679

0.000623

0.027611

0.000857

0.003936
Government (Civic Center)

0.575453

0.061728

0.171227

0.112384

0.022882

0.006522

0.009800

0.006298

0.000679

0.000623

0.027611

0.000857

0.003936
Hotel

0.575453

0.061728

0.171227

0.112384

0.022882

0.006522

0.009800

0.006298

0.000679

0.000623

0.027611

0.000857

0.003936
Medical Office Building

0.575453

0.061728

0.171227

0.112384

0.022882

0.006522

0.009800

0.006298

0.000679

0.000623

0.027611

0.000857

0.003936
Other Asphalt Surfaces

0.575453

0.061728

0.171227

0.112384

0.022882

0.006522

0.009800

0.006298

0.000679

0.000623

0.027611

0.000857

0.003936
Strip Mall

0.575453

0.061728

0.171227

0.112384

0.022882

0.006522

0.009800

0.006298

0.000679

0.000623

0.027611

0.000857

0.003936

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 59 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000

0.0000
6,185.811
7 6,185.811
7 0.3838

0.0384
6,206.841
7 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000

0.0000
6,185.811
7 6,185.811
7 0.3838

0.0384
6,206.841
7 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.4499

4.0169

2.9017

0.0245

0.3108

0.0000
4,452.097
1 4,452.097
1 0.0853

0.0816
4,478.553
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.4499

4.0169

2.9017

0.0245

0.3108

0.0000
4,452.097
1 4,452.097
1 0.0853

0.0816
4,478.553
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 60 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

2.47386e
+007

0.1334

1.1399

0.4851

7.2800e-
003

0.0922

0.0000
1,320.144
3 1,320.144
3 0.0253

0.0242
1,327.989
3 City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Elementary
School
416428

2.2500e-
003

0.0204

0.0172

1.2000e-
004

1.5500e-
003

0.0000

22.2222

4.3000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

22.3543
General Office
Building

1.27791e
+007

0.0689

0.6264

0.5262

3.7600e-
003

0.0476

0.0000
681.9436
681.9436

0.0131

0.0125
685.9960
Government
(Civic Center)
100150

5.4000e-
004

4.9100e-
003

4.1200e-
003

3.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

0.0000

5.3444

1.0000e-
004

5.3761
Hotel

3.78319e
+007

0.2040

1.8545

1.5578

0.0111

0.1409

0.0000
2,018.852
1 2,018.852
1 0.0387

0.0370
2,030.849
2 Medical Office
Building

6.009e
+006

0.0324

0.2946

0.2474

1.7700e-
003

0.0224

0.0000
320.6631
320.6631

6.1500e-
003

5.8800e-
003
322.5687
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Strip Mall

1.554e
+006

8.3800e-
003

0.0762

0.0640

4.6000e-
004

5.7900e-
003

0.0000

82.9274

1.5900e-
003

1.5200e-
003

83.4202
Total

0.4499

4.0169

2.9017

0.0246

0.3108

0.0000
4,452.097
1 4,452.097
1 0.0853

0.0816
4,478.553
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 61 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.47386e
+007

0.1334

1.1399

0.4851

7.2800e-
003

0.0922

0.0000
1,320.144
3 1,320.144
3 0.0253

0.0242
1,327.989
3 City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Elementary
School
416428

2.2500e-
003

0.0204

0.0172

1.2000e-
004

1.5500e-
003

0.0000

22.2222

4.3000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

22.3543
General Office
Building

1.27791e
+007

0.0689

0.6264

0.5262

3.7600e-
003

0.0476

0.0000
681.9436
681.9436

0.0131

0.0125
685.9960
Government
(Civic Center)
100150

5.4000e-
004

4.9100e-
003

4.1200e-
003

3.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

0.0000

5.3444

1.0000e-
004

5.3761
Hotel

3.78319e
+007

0.2040

1.8545

1.5578

0.0111

0.1409

0.0000
2,018.852
1 2,018.852
1 0.0387

0.0370
2,030.849
2 Medical Office
Building

6.009e
+006

0.0324

0.2946

0.2474

1.7700e-
003

0.0224

0.0000
320.6631
320.6631

6.1500e-
003

5.8800e-
003
322.5687
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Strip Mall

1.554e
+006

8.3800e-
003

0.0762

0.0640

4.6000e-
004

5.7900e-
003

0.0000

82.9274

1.5900e-
003

1.5200e-
003

83.4202
Total

0.4499

4.0169

2.9017

0.0246

0.3108

0.0000
4,452.097
1 4,452.097
1 0.0853

0.0816
4,478.553
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 62 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

1.30565e
+007
1,909.236
8 0.1185

0.0118
1,915.727
7 City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Elementary
School
360999

52.7886

3.2700e-
003

3.3000e-
004

52.9681
General Office
Building

8.25572e
+006
1,207.226
6 0.0749

7.4900e-
003
1,211.330
8 Government
(Civic Center)
64700

9.4610

5.9000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

9.4932
Hotel

8.1283e
+006
1,188.593
5 0.0737

7.3700e-
003
1,192.634
4 Medical Office
Building

3.882e
+006
567.6614

0.0352

3.5200e-
003
569.5913
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Strip Mall

8.554e
+006
1,250.843
8 0.0776

7.7600e-
003
1,255.096
3 Total
6,185.811
7 0.3838

0.0384
6,206.841
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 63 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise

1.30565e
+007
1,909.236
8 0.1185

0.0118
1,915.727
7 City Park
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Elementary
School
360999

52.7886

3.2700e-
003

3.3000e-
004

52.9681
General Office
Building

8.25572e
+006
1,207.226
6 0.0749

7.4900e-
003
1,211.330
8 Government
(Civic Center)
64700

9.4610

5.9000e-
004

6.0000e-
005

9.4932
Hotel

8.1283e
+006
1,188.593
5 0.0737

7.3700e-
003
1,192.634
4 Medical Office
Building

3.882e
+006
567.6614

0.0352

3.5200e-
003
569.5913
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Strip Mall

8.554e
+006
1,250.843
8 0.0776

7.7600e-
003
1,255.096
3 Total
6,185.811
7 0.3838

0.0384
6,206.841
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 64 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated
245.1456

4.4567
288.5475

0.4784

37.0631

37.0631
3,512.056
2 1,514.196
5 5,026.252
7 3.2805

0.2763
5,190.586
9 Unmitigated
245.1456

4.4567
288.5475

0.4784

37.0631

37.0631
3,512.056
2 1,514.196
5 5,026.252
7 3.2805

0.2763
5,190.586
9 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

8.4474

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

22.6055

0.0000

0.0000
Hearth
213.3371

4.1662
263.3414

0.4771

36.9230

36.9230
3,512.056
2 1,472.905
1 4,984.961
3 3.2411

0.2763
5,148.309
9 Landscaping

0.7556

0.2905

25.2060

1.3400e-
003

0.1401

0.0000

41.2914

0.0394

0.0000

42.2771
Total
245.1456

4.4567
288.5475

0.4784

37.0631

37.0631
3,512.056
2 1,514.196
5 5,026.252
7 3.2805

0.2763
5,190.586
9 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 65 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

8.4474

0.0000

0.0000
Consumer
Products

22.6055

0.0000

0.0000
Hearth
213.3371

4.1662
263.3414

0.4771

36.9230

36.9230
3,512.056
2 1,472.905
1 4,984.961
3 3.2411

0.2763
5,148.309
9 Landscaping

0.7556

0.2905

25.2060

1.3400e-
003

0.1401

0.0000

41.2914

0.0394

0.0000

42.2771
Total
245.1456

4.4567
288.5475

0.4784

37.0631

37.0631
3,512.056
2 1,514.196
5 5,026.252
7 3.2805

0.2763
5,190.586
9 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 66 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated
1,438.013
2 14.3815

0.3457
1,900.580
5 Unmitigated
1,438.013
2 14.3815

0.3457
1,900.580
5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 67 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
221.524 /
139.656
718.9575

7.2586

0.1745
952.4131
City Park
0 / 29.787

48.3922

3.0000e-
003

3.0000e-
004

48.5567
Elementary
School

2.0606 /

5.2987

13.1855

0.0679

1.6600e-
003

15.3792
General Office
Building
113.394 /

69.4996
364.7922

3.7154

0.0893
484.2831
Government
(Civic Center)

0.993298 /

0.608796

3.1955

0.0326

7.8000e-
004

4.2422
Hotel

11.415 /

1.26834

27.4168

0.3734

8.9300e-
003

39.4140
Medical Office
Building

37.6442 /

7.17032

95.2680

1.2318

0.0295
134.8483
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000
Strip Mall

51.8508 /

31.7795
166.8054

1.6989

0.0408
221.4440
Total
1,438.013
2 14.3816

0.3457
1,900.580
5 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 68 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
221.524 /
139.656
718.9575

7.2586

0.1745
952.4131
City Park
0 / 29.787

48.3922

3.0000e-
003

3.0000e-
004

48.5567
Elementary
School

2.0606 /

5.2987

13.1855

0.0679

1.6600e-
003

15.3792
General Office
Building
113.394 /

69.4996
364.7922

3.7154

0.0893
484.2831
Government
(Civic Center)

0.993298 /

0.608796

3.1955

0.0326

7.8000e-
004

4.2422
Hotel

11.415 /

1.26834

27.4168

0.3734

8.9300e-
003

39.4140
Medical Office
Building

37.6442 /

7.17032

95.2680

1.2318

0.0295
134.8483
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0

0.0000

0.0000
Strip Mall

51.8508 /

31.7795
166.8054

1.6989

0.0408
221.4440
Total
1,438.013
2 14.3816

0.3457
1,900.580
5 Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 69 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated
1,332.534
2 78.7505

0.0000
3,301.297
0 Unmitigated
1,332.534
2 78.7505

0.0000
3,301.297
0 Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 70 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
1564
317.4779

18.7624

0.0000
786.5380
City Park

2.15 0.4364

0.0258

0.0000

1.0812
Elementary
School
155.13

31.4900

1.8610

0.0000

78.0151
General Office
Building
593.34
120.4427

7.1180

0.0000
298.3916
Government
(Civic Center)

28.5 5.7852

0.3419

0.0000

14.3327
Hotel
246.38

50.0129

2.9557

0.0000
123.9049
Medical Office
Building
3240
657.6907

38.8684

0.0000
1,629.400
9 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Strip Mall
735
149.1984

8.8174

0.0000
369.6326
Total
1,332.534
2 78.7505

0.0000
3,301.297
0 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 71 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
Rise
1564
317.4779

18.7624

0.0000
786.5380
City Park

2.15 0.4364

0.0258

0.0000

1.0812
Elementary
School
155.13

31.4900

1.8610

0.0000

78.0151
General Office
Building
593.34
120.4427

7.1180

0.0000
298.3916
Government
(Civic Center)

28.5 5.7852

0.3419

0.0000

14.3327
Hotel
246.38

50.0129

2.9557

0.0000
123.9049
Medical Office
Building
3240
657.6907

38.8684

0.0000
1,629.400
9 Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000

0.0000

0.0000
Strip Mall
735
149.1984

8.8174

0.0000
369.6326
Total
1,332.534
2 78.7505

0.0000
3,301.297
0 Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 72 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 5/4/2022 10:27 AM

Page 73 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan (Approved 2014) - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

ATTACHMENT B

CalEEMod Emission Model – UDSPA

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022
San Diego County, Annual
Project Characteristics - RPS 2030 included
Land Use - 203 acres total. Mixed Use Residential includes student housing Construction Phase - Construction schedule would be similar to approved UDSP Trips and VMT -

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building
920.00
1000sqft

21.12 920,000.00
0 Government (Civic Center)

5.00 1000sqft

0.11 5,000.00
0 Medical Office Building
200.00
1000sqft

4.59 200,000.00
0 Elementary School
850.00
Student

1.63 71,062.86
0 Other Asphalt Surfaces

22.00 Acre

22.00 958,320.00
0 City Park

31.13 Acre

31.13 1,356,022.80
0 Hotel
250.00
Room

8.33 363,000.00
0 Apartments Mid Rise
3,400.00
Dwelling Unit
106.17
3,400,000.00
9724
Strip Mall
345.00
1000sqft

7.92 345,000.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
13 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)

2.6 40

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
San Diego Gas & Electric
2030
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
322.38

0.02 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.002
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 1 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022 - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Grading -
Architectural Coating -
Vehicle Trips - Rates based on SANDAG Trip Generation Per TS.

Area Coating -
Energy Use -
Water And Wastewater -
Solid Waste -
Fleet Mix -
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
330.00
220.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
4,650.00
3,100.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
300.00
200.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
465.00
310.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
330.00
220.00
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
180.00
120.00
tblLandUse
LotAcreage

89.47 106.17
tblProjectCharacteristics
CH4IntensityFactor

0.033

0.02 tblProjectCharacteristics
CO2IntensityFactor
539.98
322.38
tblProjectCharacteristics
N2OIntensityFactor

0.004

0.002
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

4.91 6.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

1.96 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

2.21 17.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

0.00 22.88
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

8.19 10.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

8.57 50.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR

42.04 80.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

4.09 6.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

2.19 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 2 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022 - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

0.70 17.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

0.00 22.88
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

5.95 10.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

1.42 50.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

20.43 80.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

5.44 6.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

0.78 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

1.89 1.60
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

9.74 17.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

33.98 22.88
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

8.36 10.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

34.80 50.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR

44.32 80.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 3 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022 - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022

0.3343

3.2541

2.5092

4.8000e-
003

0.4808

0.1574

0.6382

0.2179

0.1460

0.3639

0.0000
420.7791
420.7791

0.1180

3.6000e-
004
423.8359
2023

0.4125

4.2156

3.3169

7.3000e-
003

1.8674

0.1790

2.0465

0.7608

0.1647

0.9255

0.0000
641.8714
641.8714

0.2028

4.5000e-
004
647.0752
2024

1.0769

6.5341

9.7561

0.0381

3.5298

0.1568

3.6866

0.9812

0.1458

1.1270

0.0000
3,593.746
1 3,593.746
1 0.2404

0.2454
3,672.889
4 2025

1.6035

8.4487

14.8452

0.0650

5.1767

0.1264

5.3030

1.3966

0.1190

1.5156

0.0000
6,213.479
4 6,213.479
4 0.2419

0.4681
6,359.012
4 2026

1.5303

8.3135

14.2272

0.0634

5.1767

0.1251

5.3017

1.3966

0.1178

1.5144

0.0000
6,086.927
3 6,086.927
3 0.2371

0.4560
6,228.747
9 2027

1.4620

8.1896

13.6958

0.0618

5.1767

0.1236

5.3003

1.3966

0.1164

1.5130

0.0000
5,964.388
7 5,964.388
7 0.2330

0.4443
6,102.609
0 2028

1.3927

8.0553

13.2009

0.0602

5.1568

0.1216

5.2784

1.3913

0.1145

1.5058

0.0000
5,830.049
0 5,830.049
0 0.2288

0.4318
5,964.441
2 2029

1.3351

7.9786

12.8564

0.0591

5.1767

0.1205

5.2972

1.3966

0.1136

1.5102

0.0000
5,746.733
9 5,746.733
9 0.2269

0.4230
5,878.460
6 2030

1.2663

7.3043

12.5241

0.0584

5.1767

0.0696

5.2463

1.3966

0.0669

1.4635

0.0000
5,694.176
8 5,694.176
8 0.1671

0.4139
5,821.689
8 2031

1.2062

7.2426

12.2206

0.0574

5.1767

0.0684

5.2451

1.3966

0.0657

1.4624

0.0000
5,612.631
3 5,612.631
3 0.1646

0.4061
5,737.761
8 2032

1.1562

7.2204

12.0057

0.0567

5.1965

0.0676

5.2641

1.4020

0.0650

1.4670

0.0000
5,562.549
3 5,562.549
3 0.1632

0.4009
5,686.102
3 2033

1.0993

7.1240

11.6920

0.0554

5.1569

0.0660

5.2229

1.3913

0.0635

1.4548

0.0000
5,457.406
1 5,457.406
1 0.1601

0.3921
5,578.244
9 2034

1.0560

7.0864

11.4919

0.0547

5.1569

0.0651

5.2220

1.3913

0.0627

1.4540

0.0000
5,401.703
7 5,401.703
7 0.1585

0.3869
5,520.971
6 2035

1.0094

6.9802

11.3612

0.0543

5.1767

0.0569

5.2337

1.3966

0.0546

1.4512

0.0000
5,373.743
5 5,373.743
5 0.1565

0.3840
5,492.078
0 2036

0.4957

3.0217

5.5799

0.0228

1.9536

0.0368

1.9904

0.5270

0.0359

0.5629

0.0000
2,221.772
3 2,221.772
3 0.0665

0.1443
2,266.436
9 2037

70.5947

0.2800

1.7728

5.4400e-
003

0.6733

8.0700e-
003

0.6813

0.1789

7.9200e-
003

0.1868

0.0000
532.4658
532.4658

9.9000e-
003

9.1700e-
003
535.4470
2038

5.1626

0.0105

0.0969

3.4000e-
004

0.0490

2.1000e-
004

0.0492

0.0130

2.0000e-
004

0.0132

0.0000

33.8628

5.3000e-
004

6.7000e-
004

34.0752
Maximum

70.5947

8.4487

14.8452

0.0650

5.1965

0.1790

5.3030

1.4020

0.1647

1.5156

0.0000
6,213.479
4 6,213.479
4 0.2419

0.4681
6,359.012
4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 4 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022 - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.1 Overall Construction
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 5 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022 - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022

0.3343

3.2541

2.5092

4.8000e-
003

0.4808

0.1574

0.6382

0.2179

0.1460

0.3639

0.0000
420.7786
420.7786

0.1180

3.6000e-
004
423.8354
2023

0.4125

4.2156

3.3169

7.3000e-
003

1.8674

0.1790

2.0465

0.7608

0.1647

0.9255

0.0000
641.8707
641.8707

0.2028

4.5000e-
004
647.0744
2024

1.0769

6.5341

9.7561

0.0381

3.5298

0.1568

3.6866

0.9812

0.1458

1.1270

0.0000
3,593.745
5 3,593.745
5 0.2404

0.2454
3,672.888
8 2025

1.6035

8.4487

14.8452

0.0650

5.1767

0.1264

5.3030

1.3966

0.1190

1.5156

0.0000
6,213.479
1 6,213.479
1 0.2419

0.4681
6,359.012
0 2026

1.5303

8.3135

14.2272

0.0634

5.1767

0.1251

5.3017

1.3966

0.1178

1.5144

0.0000
6,086.927
0 6,086.927
0 0.2371

0.4560
6,228.747
6 2027

1.4620

8.1896

13.6958

0.0618

5.1767

0.1236

5.3003

1.3966

0.1164

1.5130

0.0000
5,964.388
4 5,964.388
4 0.2330

0.4443
6,102.608
6 2028

1.3927

8.0553

13.2009

0.0602

5.1568

0.1216

5.2784

1.3913

0.1145

1.5058

0.0000
5,830.048
6 5,830.048
6 0.2288

0.4318
5,964.440
8 2029

1.3351

7.9786

12.8564

0.0591

5.1767

0.1205

5.2972

1.3966

0.1136

1.5102

0.0000
5,746.733
5 5,746.733
5 0.2269

0.4230
5,878.460
2 2030

1.2663

7.3043

12.5241

0.0584

5.1767

0.0696

5.2463

1.3966

0.0669

1.4635

0.0000
5,694.176
4 5,694.176
4 0.1671

0.4139
5,821.689
4 2031

1.2062

7.2426

12.2206

0.0574

5.1767

0.0684

5.2451

1.3966

0.0657

1.4624

0.0000
5,612.630
9 5,612.630
9 0.1646

0.4061
5,737.761
4 2032

1.1562

7.2204

12.0057

0.0567

5.1965

0.0676

5.2641

1.4020

0.0650

1.4670

0.0000
5,562.548
9 5,562.548
9 0.1632

0.4009
5,686.101
9 2033

1.0993

7.1240

11.6920

0.0554

5.1569

0.0660

5.2229

1.3913

0.0635

1.4548

0.0000
5,457.405
7 5,457.405
7 0.1601

0.3921
5,578.244
5 2034

1.0560

7.0864

11.4919

0.0547

5.1569

0.0651

5.2220

1.3913

0.0627

1.4540

0.0000
5,401.703
2 5,401.703
2 0.1585

0.3869
5,520.971
2 2035

1.0094

6.9802

11.3612

0.0543

5.1767

0.0569

5.2337

1.3966

0.0546

1.4512

0.0000
5,373.743
1 5,373.743
1 0.1565

0.3840
5,492.077
6 2036

0.4957

3.0217

5.5799

0.0228

1.9536

0.0368

1.9904

0.5270

0.0359

0.5629

0.0000
2,221.771
9 2,221.771
9 0.0665

0.1443
2,266.436
5 2037

70.5947

0.2800

1.7728

5.4400e-
003

0.6733

8.0700e-
003

0.6813

0.1789

7.9200e-
003

0.1868

0.0000
532.4657
532.4657

9.9000e-
003

9.1700e-
003
535.4469
2038

5.1626

0.0105

0.0969

3.4000e-
004

0.0490

2.1000e-
004

0.0492

0.0130

2.0000e-
004

0.0132

0.0000

33.8628

5.3000e-
004

6.7000e-
004

34.0752
Maximum

70.5947

8.4487

14.8452

0.0650

5.1965

0.1790

5.3030

1.4020

0.1647

1.5156

0.0000
6,213.479
1 6,213.479
1 0.2419

0.4681
6,359.012
0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 6 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022 - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
2 12-10-2021
3-9-2022

0.4164

0.4164
3 3-10-2022
6-9-2022

0.9342

0.9342
4 6-10-2022
9-9-2022

0.9342

0.9342
5 9-10-2022
12-9-2022

1.0259

1.0259
6 12-10-2022
3-9-2023

1.0208

1.0208
7 3-10-2023
6-9-2023

1.1313

1.1313
8 6-10-2023
9-9-2023

1.2461

1.2461
9 9-10-2023
12-9-2023

1.2328

1.2328
10 12-10-2023
3-9-2024

1.1774

1.1774
11 3-10-2024
6-9-2024

1.1723

1.1723
12 6-10-2024
9-9-2024

2.2837

2.2837
13 9-10-2024
12-9-2024

2.6148

2.6148
14 12-10-2024
3-9-2025

2.5428

2.5428
15 3-10-2025
6-9-2025

2.4906

2.4906
16 6-10-2025
9-9-2025

2.4637

2.4637
17 9-10-2025
12-9-2025

2.5225

2.5225
18 12-10-2025
3-9-2026

2.4804

2.4804
19 3-10-2026
6-9-2026

2.4392

2.4392
20 6-10-2026
9-9-2026

2.4131

2.4131
21 9-10-2026
12-9-2026

2.4700

2.4700
22 12-10-2026
3-9-2027

2.4307

2.4307
23 3-10-2027
6-9-2027

2.3918

2.3918
24 6-10-2027
9-9-2027

2.3664

2.3664
25 9-10-2027
12-9-2027

2.4215

2.4215
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 7 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022 - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

26 12-10-2027
3-9-2028

2.4131

2.4131
27 3-10-2028
6-9-2028

2.3504

2.3504
28 6-10-2028
9-9-2028

2.3257

2.3257
29 9-10-2028
12-9-2028

2.3791

2.3791
30 12-10-2028
3-9-2029

2.3435

2.3435
31 3-10-2029
6-9-2029

2.3082

2.3082
32 6-10-2029
9-9-2029

2.2841

2.2841
33 9-10-2029
12-9-2029

2.3359

2.3359
34 12-10-2029
3-9-2030

2.1935

2.1935
35 3-10-2030
6-9-2030

2.1215

2.1215
36 6-10-2030
9-9-2030

2.0981

2.0981
37 9-10-2030
12-9-2030

2.1499

2.1499
38 12-10-2030
3-9-2031

2.1247

2.1247
39 3-10-2031
6-9-2031

2.0912

2.0912
40 6-10-2031
9-9-2031

2.0683

2.0683
41 9-10-2031
12-9-2031

2.1187

2.1187
42 12-10-2031
3-9-2032

2.1199

2.1199
43 3-10-2032
6-9-2032

2.0651

2.0651
44 6-10-2032
9-9-2032

2.0427

2.0427
45 9-10-2032
12-9-2032

2.0919

2.0919
46 12-10-2032
3-9-2033

2.0725

2.0725
47 3-10-2033
6-9-2033

2.0427

2.0427
48 6-10-2033
9-9-2033

2.0206

2.0206
49 9-10-2033
12-9-2033

2.0688

2.0688
50 12-10-2033
3-9-2034

2.0510

2.0510
51 3-10-2034
6-9-2034

2.0223

2.0223
52 6-10-2034
9-9-2034

2.0006

2.0006
53 9-10-2034
12-9-2034

2.0479

2.0479
54 12-10-2034
3-9-2035

2.0110

2.0110
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 8 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022 - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

55 3-10-2035
6-9-2035

1.9759

1.9759
56 6-10-2035
9-9-2035

1.9545

1.9545
57 9-10-2035
12-9-2035

2.0014

2.0014
58 12-10-2035
3-9-2036

2.0219

2.0219
59 3-10-2036
6-9-2036

1.5011

1.5011
60 6-10-2036
9-9-2036

0.2073

0.2073
61 9-10-2036
12-9-2036

0.2052

0.2052
62 12-10-2036
3-9-2037

0.2029

0.2029
63 3-10-2037
6-9-2037

20.2212

20.2212
64 6-10-2037
9-9-2037

22.6610

22.6610
65 9-10-2037
12-9-2037

22.4195

22.4195
66 12-10-2037
3-9-2038

10.5945

10.5945
Highest

22.6610

22.6610
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 9 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022 - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area
242.4404

4.4567
288.5441

0.4784

37.0631

37.0631
3,512.056
2 1,514.189
9 5,026.246
1 3.2805

0.2763
5,190.579
9 Energy

0.3746

3.3328

2.3271

0.0204

0.2588

0.0000
9,074.881
8 9,074.881
8 0.4041

0.1013
9,115.160
7 Mobile

27.1161

26.1531
241.6603

0.4910

61.6390

0.3465

61.9855

16.4485

0.3232

16.7716

0.0000
48,008.16
18 48,008.16
18 3.4906

2.1857
48,746.77
47 Waste

0.0000

0.0000
1,068.755
5 0.0000
1,068.755
5 63.1616

0.0000
2,647.796
6 Water

0.0000

0.0000
141.2051
1,341.378
8 1,482.583
9 14.5863

0.3508
1,951.772
2 Total
269.9311

33.9426
532.5314

0.9899

61.6390

37.6684

99.3074

16.4485

37.6451

54.0935
4,722.016
8 59,938.61
24 64,660.62
92 84.9230

2.9140
67,652.08
41 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 10 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022 - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area
242.4404

4.4567
288.5441

0.4784

37.0631

37.0631
3,512.056
2 1,514.189
9 5,026.246
1 3.2805

0.2763
5,190.579
9 Energy

0.3746

3.3328

2.3271

0.0204

0.2588

0.0000
9,074.881
8 9,074.881
8 0.4041

0.1013
9,115.160
7 Mobile

27.1161

26.1531
241.6603

0.4910

61.6390

0.3465

61.9855

16.4485

0.3232

16.7716

0.0000
48,008.16
18 48,008.16
18 3.4906

2.1857
48,746.77
47 Waste

0.0000

0.0000
1,068.755
5 0.0000
1,068.755
5 63.1616

0.0000
2,647.796
6 Water

0.0000

0.0000
141.2051
1,341.378
8 1,482.583
9 14.5863

0.3508
1,951.772
2 Total
269.9311

33.9426
532.5314

0.9899

61.6390

37.6684

99.3074

16.4485

37.6451

54.0935
4,722.016
8 59,938.61
24 64,660.62
92 84.9230

2.9140
67,652.08
41 Mitigated Operational

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 11 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022 - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.38 Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
2 8.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247

0.40 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Excavators
2 8.00
158

0.38 Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187

0.41 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247

0.40 Grading
Scrapers
2 8.00
367

0.48 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
1 7.00
231

0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132

0.36 Residential Indoor: 6,885,000; Residential Outdoor: 2,295,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 2,856,094; Non-Residential Outdoor: 952,031; Striped Parking Area: 57,499 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 180
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 930
Acres of Paving: 22
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 12 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022 - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road

0.2639

2.5719

2.0594

3.8800e-
003

0.1243

0.1155

0.0000
339.9023
339.9023

0.0955

0.0000
342.2892
Total

0.2639

2.5719

2.0594

3.8800e-
003

0.1243

0.1155

0.0000
339.9023
339.9023

0.0955

0.0000
342.2892
Unmitigated Construction On-Site

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Site Preparation
7 18.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
8 20.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 4,073.00
1,055.00

0.00 10.80

7.30 20.00
LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 815.00

0.00 0.00

10.80 7.30

20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 13 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022 - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.3300e-
003

3.1400e-
003

0.0369

1.1000e-
004

0.0120

7.0000e-
005

0.0121

3.2000e-
003

6.0000e-
005

3.2600e-
003

0.0000

9.8925

3.1000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

9.9853
Total

4.3300e-
003

3.1400e-
003

0.0369

1.1000e-
004

0.0120

7.0000e-
005

0.0121

3.2000e-
003

6.0000e-
005

3.2600e-
003

0.0000

9.8925

3.1000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

0.2639

2.5719

2.0594

3.8800e-
003

0.1243

0.1155

0.0000
339.9019
339.9019

0.0955

0.0000
342.2887
Total

0.2639

2.5719

2.0594

3.8800e-
003

0.1243

0.1155

0.0000
339.9019
339.9019

0.0955

0.0000
342.2887
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 14 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022 - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

4.3300e-
003

3.1400e-
003

0.0369

1.1000e-
004

0.0120

7.0000e-
005

0.0121

3.2000e-
003

6.0000e-
005

3.2600e-
003

0.0000

9.8925

3.1000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

9.9853
Total

4.3300e-
003

3.1400e-
003

0.0369

1.1000e-
004

0.0120

7.0000e-
005

0.0121

3.2000e-
003

6.0000e-
005

3.2600e-
003

0.0000

9.8925

3.1000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

9.9853
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.4658

0.0000

0.4658

0.2139

0.0000

0.2139

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0650

0.6782

0.4038

7.8000e-
004

0.0331

0.0304

0.0000

68.5508

0.0222

0.0000

69.1050
Total

0.0650

0.6782

0.4038

7.8000e-
004

0.4658

0.0331

0.4989

0.2139

0.0304

0.2443

0.0000

68.5508

0.0222

0.0000

69.1050
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 15 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022 - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.0700e-
003

7.7000e-
004

9.0700e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.9600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.9800e-
003

7.9000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.4336

8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.4564
Total

1.0700e-
003

7.7000e-
004

9.0700e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.9600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.9800e-
003

7.9000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.4336

8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

0.4658

0.0000

0.4658

0.2139

0.0000

0.2139

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.0650

0.6782

0.4038

7.8000e-
004

0.0331

0.0304

0.0000

68.5507

0.0222

0.0000

69.1049
Total

0.0650

0.6782

0.4038

7.8000e-
004

0.4658

0.0331

0.4989

0.2139

0.0304

0.2443

0.0000

68.5507

0.0222

0.0000

69.1049
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 16 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022 - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.0700e-
003

7.7000e-
004

9.0700e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.9600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.9800e-
003

7.9000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.4336

8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.4564
Total

1.0700e-
003

7.7000e-
004

9.0700e-
003

3.0000e-
005

2.9600e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.9800e-
003

7.9000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

8.0000e-
004

0.0000

2.4336

8.0000e-
005

7.0000e-
005

2.4564
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

0.8091

0.0000

0.8091

0.4026

0.0000

0.4026

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.1051

1.0872

0.7207

1.5000e-
003

0.0500

0.0460

0.0000
132.1303
132.1303

0.0427

0.0000
133.1986
Total

0.1051

1.0872

0.7207

1.5000e-
003

0.8091

0.0500

0.8591

0.4026

0.0460

0.4486

0.0000
132.1303
132.1303

0.0427

0.0000
133.1986
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 17 of 73 ends

University District Specific Plan Amendment 2022 - San Diego County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling

0.0000

0.0000
Vendor

0.0000

0.0000
Worker

1.9200e-
003

1.3300e-
003

0.0163

5.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
003

3.0000e-
005

5.7300e-
003

1.5200e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.5400e-
003

0.0000

4.5682

1.3000e-
004

4.6091
Total

1.9200e-
003

1.3300e-
003

0.0163

5.0000e-
005

5.7000e-
003

3.0000e-
005

5.7300e-
003

1.5200e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.5400e-
003

0.0000

4.5682

1.3000e-
004

0.8091

0.0000

0.8091

0.4026

0.0000

0.4026

0.0000

0.0000
Off-Road

0.1051

1.0872

0.7207

1.5000e-
003

0.0500

0.0460

0.0000
132.1301
132.1301

0.0427

0.0000
133.1984
Total

0.1051

1.0872

0.7207

1.5000e-
003

0.8091

0.0500

0.8591

0.4026

0.0460

0.4486

0.0000
132.1301
132.1301

0.0427

0.0000
133.1984
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 4/11/2022 8:54 AM

Page 18 of 73 ends

San Marcos City CouncilJuly 12, 2022

San Marcos City Council
July 12, 2022