San Marcos City Council
October 24, 2023

Prepared For Prepared By
AOA San Marcos, LLC
709 Randolph Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
CR Associates
3900 Fifth Avenue, Suite 310
San Diego, CA 92103
SAN MARCOS ARTIST’S

VILLAGE
MAY 2023
FINAL
Local Transportation Analysis
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis
ES-1
Executive Summary
Project Setting and Description
The Project is a mixed-use development on 11.08 acres (5.03 acres of residential uses and 6.05 acres of office/retail uses) located at the northwest corner of Linda Vista Road and Grand Avenue in the City of San Marcos. The Project proposes to construct 102 multi-family dwelling units (on west end of project) as well as 7 live/work units (on east end of project) on approximately 5.03 acres.

Live/work units are units consisting of a residential and commercial/office component, where a resident is able to both live and work. Additionally, the Project proposes to construct 7,658 square feet (SF) of office space and 49,266 SF of specialty retail space on approximately 6.05 acres. It should be noted that the office space is intended for single tenant and the retail space is not intended to be occupied by grocery store uses or similar uses.

The property is bordered by Grand Avenue on the northeast side, Linda Vista Road on the southeast side, and industrial land uses to the west. Per the City’s General Plan, the site is designated as a Commercial (C) land use and thus the Project, being a mixed-use development, is inconsistent with the General Plan and zoning designation. However, the project applicant is processing a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to adjust the zoning to “Mixed-Use” in order to be consistent with the General Plan. The Project’s assumed opening year is Year 2024.

The Project will provide the following four new side-street stop-controlled driveways and roadway improvements:
 Project Driveway #1 – This new, full-access driveway will be located approximately 900 feet northwest of Linda Vista Drive
 Project Driveway #2 – This new, full-access driveway will be located approximately 300 feet northwest of Linda Vista Drive
 Project Driveway #3 – This new, full-access driveway will be located approximately 700 feet southwest of Grand Avenue
 Project Driveway #4 – This new, full-access driveway will be located approximately 250 feet southwest of Grand Avenue
 Construction of raised median at Grand Avenue along Project Frontage. Median breaks will be present to allow for full access of the driveways along Grand Avenue.

Based on the preliminary review of the project site plan, the Project would not conflict with existing or planned transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. The Project will construct a landscaped buffer and a Class I bike path with a separate pedestrian path adjacent to it along the segments of Linda Vista Drive and Grand Avenue fronting the Project. Additionally, the Project will reconstruct curb ramps located along project driveways, including detectable surface warning tactiles (yellow truncated domes). Implementation of the recommendation above should enhance the overall bicycle and pedestrian environment.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis
ES-2
Per the City’s Transportation Analysis Guidelines (TIAG), trip generation rates were derived from SANDAG’s (not so) Brief Guide to Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002).

The Project is anticipated to generate a net total of 2,241 daily trips, including 126 trips (60-in/62- out) during the AM peak hour and 189 (101-in/89-out) during the PM peak hour.

The following roadway segments and intersections were included for analysis:

Roadway Segments
 Via Vera Cruz, between Grand Avenue and Linda Vista Drive  Via Vera Cruz, between Linda Vista Drive and West San Marcos Boulevard  Grand Avenue, between Las Posas Road and Via Vera Cruz  Grand Avenue, between Via Vera Cruz and Linda Vista Drive  Grand Avenue, between Linda Vista Drive and West San Marcos Boulevard  Linda Vista Drive, between Via Vera Cruz and Grand Avenue  West San Marcos Boulevard, between Via Vera Cruz and South Bent Avenue  West San Marcos Boulevard, between South Bent Avenue and Grand Avenue Intersections

1. South Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue

2. SR-78 EB Ramps/Via Vera Cruz & Grand Avenue

3. Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive

4. Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue

5. South Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue

6. Via Vera Cruz & West San Marcos Boulevard

7. Grand Avenue & West San Marcos Boulevard

8. Project Driveway #1 & Grand Avenue

9. Project Driveway #2 & Grand Avenue

10. Project Driveway #3 & Linda Vista Drive

11. Project Driveway #4 & Linda Vista Drive
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis
ES-3
LOS Deficiencies and Improvement Requirements
Determination of the Need for Off-Site Improvements to Accommodate Project Traffic – Near-Term Year 2024 with Project Conditions
Roadway Segment Analysis
No improvements required.

Intersection Analysis
No improvements required.

Determination of the Need for Off-Site Improvements to Accommodate Project Traffic – Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions
Roadway Segment Analysis
No improvements required.

Intersection Analysis
Because implementation of the Project would further deteriorate traffic operations and increase the delay at an intersection already operating at LOS E or F by more than 2.0 seconds, the Project would cause an inconsistency with Policy M-1.4 at the following intersection:
 Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue – To improve operations at this intersection, the Project shall provide a fair share contribution to install a traffic signal. It should be noted the intersection already operates at substandard LOS E without the Project, indicating the Project does not directly cause the inconsistency. Upon implementation of this improvement, the intersection would operate at acceptable LOS and better than pre-project conditions.

The total number of vehicle trips passing through this intersection during the PM peak hour is 1,811, of which 101 (or 5.6% of the total volume) are vehicle trips generated by the Project. Thus, the Project would be responsible for 5.6% of the cost to implement this improvement.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis
Page i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. ES-1 Project Setting and Description .................................................................................................................ES-1 LOS Deficiencies and Improvement Requirements ...................................................................................ES-3

1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Project Description ............................................................................................................................... 1 Report Organization ............................................................................................................................. 4

2.0 Analysis Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 5 Level of Service (LOS) Definition .......................................................................................................... 5 Roadway Segment LOS Standards and Thresholds ............................................................................. 5 Peak Hour Intersection LOS Standards and Thresholds ...................................................................... 6 Determination of Project Study Area .................................................................................................... 8 City of San Marcos LOS Standards ....................................................................................................... 9

3.0 Project Traffic ................................................................................................................................... 10 Project Trip Generation ..................................................................................................................... 10 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment .......................................................................................... 10 Project Study Area ............................................................................................................................. 23

4.0 Active Transportation Evaluation ........................................................................................................ 25 Transit Access ................................................................................................................................... 25 Bicycle ............................................................................................................................................... 25 Pedestrian ......................................................................................................................................... 26

5.0 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................................ 27 Existing Transportation Network ....................................................................................................... 27 Existing Intersection Volumes ........................................................................................................... 27 Existing Traffic Conditions ................................................................................................................. 27

6.0 Near-Term Year 2024 Conditions ....................................................................................................... 36 Cumulative Project Traffic ................................................................................................................. 36 Cumulative Project Trip Generation................................................................................................... 37 Near-Term Year 2024 Base Roadway Network and Traffic Volumes ................................................ 41 Near-Term Year 2024 Base Traffic Conditions .................................................................................. 41 Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project Roadway Network and Traffic Volumes ............................. 46 Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project Traffic Conditions .............................................................. 46

7.0 Horizon Year 2050 Conditions ............................................................................................................ 52 Horizon Year 2050 Roadway Network and Traffic Volumes .............................................................. 52 Horizon Year 2050 Traffic Conditions ............................................................................................... 55 Horizon Year 2050 with Project Roadway Network and Traffic Volumes .......................................... 58 Horizon Year 2050 with Project Traffic Conditions ............................................................................ 58

8.0 LOS Deficiencies and Improvement Requirements ............................................................................... 64 Determination of the Need for Off-Site Improvements to Accommodate Project Traffic – Near-Term Year 2024 with Project Conditions .............................................................................................................. 64 Determination of the Need for Off-Site Improvements to Accommodate Project Traffic – Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions ...................................................................................................................... 64 San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis
Page ii
Table of Contents (continued)

9.0 Site Access and Circulation ................................................................................................................ 66 Driveway Access ................................................................................................................................ 66 Internal Circulation ............................................................................................................................ 68 Appendices
Appendix A - Grand Avenue Offsite Improvement Plans
Appendix B - Scoping Memorandum
Appendix C - Signal Timings
Appendix D - Trip Distribution Technical Memorandum
Appendix E - Internal Capture Calculations
Appendix F - Traffic Counts
Appendix G - LOS Calculation Worksheets Existing Conditions Appendix H - Cumulative Project Information
Appendix I - LOS Calculation Worksheets Near-Term Year 2024 Base Conditions Appendix J - LOS Calculation Worksheets Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project Conditions Appendix K - Transportation Forecast Information Center (TFIC) Volumes and Horizon Year 2050 Volume Development
Appendix L - LOS Calculation Worksheets Horizon Year 2050 Conditions Appendix M - LOS Calculation Worksheets Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions Appendix N - LOS Calculation Worksheets Horizon Year 2050 with Project with Mitigation Conditions Appendix O - Traffic Signal Warrant
Appendix P - Intersection Queueing Reports
Appendix Q - Sight Distance Exhibit
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis
Page iii
Figures
Figure 1.1 - Project Regional Location ................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 1.2 - Project Site Plan ................................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 3.1A - Project Trip Distribution – Residential (Roadway) ......................................................................... 13 Figure 3.1B - Project Trip Distribution – Residential (Intersection) .................................................................... 14 Figure 3.2A - Project Trip Distribution – Office and Retail (Roadway) ................................................................ 15 Figure 3.2B - Project Trip Distribution – Office and Retail (Intersection) ............................................................ 16 Figure 3.3A - Project Trip Assignment – Residential (Roadway) ......................................................................... 17 Figure 3.3B - Project Trip Assignment – Residential (Intersection) .................................................................... 18 Figure 3.4A - Project Trip Assignment – Office and Retail (Roadway) ................................................................ 19 Figure 3.4B - Project Trip Assignment – Office and Retail (Intersection) ............................................................ 20 Figure 3.5A - Project Trip Assignment (Roadway) ............................................................................................... 21 Figure 3.5B - Project Trip Assignment (Intersection) .......................................................................................... 22 Figure 3.6 - Project Study Area ........................................................................................................................... 24 Figure 5.1 - Functional Classifications – Existing Conditions ............................................................................. 28 Figure 5.2 - Intersection Geometrics – Existing Conditions ................................................................................ 29 Figure 5.3A - Traffic Volumes – Existing Conditions (Roadway).......................................................................... 30 Figure 5.3B - Traffic Volumes – Existing Conditions (Intersection) ..................................................................... 31 Figure 6.1 - Cumulative Projects Location .......................................................................................................... 38 Figure 6.2A - Cumulative Project Trip Assignment (Roadway) ............................................................................ 39 Figure 6.2B - Cumulative Project Trip Assignment (Intersection) ....................................................................... 40 Figure 6.3A - Traffic Volumes – Near-Term Year 2024 Base Conditions (Roadway) .......................................... 42 Figure 6.3B - Traffic Volumes – Near-Term Year 2024 Base Conditions (Intersection) ..................................... 43 Figure 6.4A - Traffic Volumes – Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project Conditions (Roadway) ....................... 47 Figure 6.4B - Traffic Volumes – Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project Conditions (Intersection) .................. 48 Figure 7.1A - Traffic Volumes – Horizon Year 2050 Conditions (Roadway) ........................................................ 53 Figure 7.1B - Traffic Volumes – Horizon Year 2050 Conditions (Intersection) ................................................... 54 Figure 7.2A - Traffic Volumes – Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions (Roadway) .................................... 59 Figure 7.2B - Traffic Volumes – Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions (Intersection) ............................... 60 San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis
Page iv
Tables
Table 2.1 - LOS Definitions .................................................................................................................................... 5 Table 2.2 - Roadway Segment Daily Capacity and LOS Standards ........................................................................ 6 Table 2.3 - Signalized Intersection LOS Operational Analysis Method .................................................................. 7 Table 2.4 - LOS Criteria for Stop Controlled Unsignalized Intersections ................................................................ 8 Table 3.1 - Project Trip Generation ..................................................................................................................... 12 Table 5.1 - Existing Transportation Network Characteristics .............................................................................. 32 Table 5.2 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Existing Conditions ..................................................................... 33 Table 5.3 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Existing Conditions .............................................................. 35 Table 6.1 - Cumulative Project Trip Generation .................................................................................................. 37 Table 6.2 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Near-Term Year 2024 Base Conditions ...................................... 44 Table 6.3 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Near-Term Year 2024 Base Conditions ............................... 45 Table 6.4 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project Conditions .................. 49 Table 6.5 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project Conditions ........... 51 Table 7.1 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 Conditions.................................................... 56 Table 7.2 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 Conditions............................................. 57 Table 7.3 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions ................................ 61 Table 7.4 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions ......................... 63 Table 8.1 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 with Project with Mitigation Conditions ...................................................................................................................................... 65 Table 9.1 - Project Driveway Queue Analysis Results ......................................................................................... 67 San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

1.0 Introduction
The purpose of this Local Transportation Analysis (LTA) is to document the effect the San Marcos Artist’s Village project (the “Project”) would have on the circulation network and to determine if improvements are required. Per the City’s Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (TIAG), the City strives to maintain intersection and roadway segment operations based on LOS standards outlined in the General Plan Mobility Element. Improvements should be identified for any study facilities that do not meet City LOS standards to increase performance to acceptable or pre-project conditions.

Project Description
The Project is a mixed-use development on 11.08 acres (5.03 acres of residential uses and 6.05 acres of office/retail uses) located at the northwest corner of Linda Vista Road and Grand Avenue in the City of San Marcos. The Project proposes to construct 102 multi-family dwelling units (on west end of project) as well as 7 live/work units (on east end of project) on approximately 5.03 acres.

Live/work units are units consisting of a residential and commercial/office component, where a resident is able to both live and work. Additionally, the Project proposes to construct 7,658 square feet (SF) of office space and 49,266 SF of specialty retail space on approximately 6.05 acres. It should be noted that the office space is intended for single tenant and the retail space is not intended to be occupied by grocery store uses or similar uses.

The property is bordered by Grand Avenue on the northeast side, Linda Vista Road on the southeast side, and industrial land uses to the west. Per the City’s General Plan, the site is designated as a Commercial (C) land use and thus the Project, being a mixed-use development, is inconsistent with the General Plan and zoning designation. However, the project applicant is processing a General Plan Amendment (GPA) to adjust the zoning to “Mixed-Use” in order to be consistent with the General Plan. The Project’s assumed opening year is Year 2024.

The Project will provide the following four new side-street stop-controlled driveways and roadway improvements:
 Project Driveway #1 – This new, full-access driveway will be located approximately 900 feet northwest of Linda Vista Drive
 Project Driveway #2 – This new, full-access driveway will be located approximately 300 feet northwest of Linda Vista Drive
 Project Driveway #3 – This new, full-access driveway will be located approximately 700 feet southwest of Grand Avenue
 Project Driveway #4 – This new, full-access driveway will be located approximately 250 feet southwest of Grand Avenue
 Construction of raised medians at Grand Avenue along Project Frontage. Median breaks will be present to allow for full access of the driveways along Grand Avenue. See Appendix A for improvement plan.

Figure 1.1 displays the Project’s regional location. Figure 1.2 displays the project site plan. ·|}þ78
City of Vista
City of
Carlsbad
City of
Encinitas
City of
Escondido
City of
Escondido
County of
San Diego
County of
San Diego
County of
San Diego
County of
San Diego
County of
San Diego
City of
San Diego
City of
San Marcos
N
Figure 1.1
Project Regional Location
San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
0 1 2 Miles
Project Site
^
Figure
Project Site Plan
San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis

ARTISTS VILLAGE CIVIL SITE PLAN
JOB NO. DRAWN BY:

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Report Organization
Following this introductory chapter, this report is organized into the following chapters:

2. Analysis Methodology – This chapter reviews the methods utilized to evaluate any potential General Plan inconsistencies and LOS deficiencies associated with the implementation of the Project, as required by the TIAG.

3. Project Traffic - This chapter describes the Project’s land uses and associated trip generation. Additional information such as trip distribution patterns and project trip assignment are also included in this chapter, which is used to determine the project study area.

4. Existing Conditions – This chapter describes and evaluates the existing transportation network. Vehicular operations within the study area are evaluated. LOS analysis results are also provided for existing vehicular traffic conditions.

5. Near-Term Year 2024 Conditions – This chapter describes near-term developments anticipated to generate additional study area trips and establishes a near-term baseline against which traffic generated by the Project can be compared to at the project opening day, assumed to be Year 2024. LOS analysis results are also provided for Near-Term Year 2024 Base and Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project vehicular traffic conditions.

6. Horizon Year 2050 Conditions – This chapter describes projected long-range conditions of the transportation network within the study area. Horizon Year 2050 scenario analysis is required per the City’s TIAG. LOS analysis results are also provided for Horizon Year 2050 and Horizon Year 2050 with Project vehicular traffic conditions.

7. LOS Deficiencies and Improvement Requirements - This chapter identifies any substandard facilities and provides improvement requirements to improve substandard facilities to acceptable LOS or pre-project conditions.

8. Site Access & Circulation – This chapter addresses access to the project site and discusses the functionality of the Project’s internal circulation.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

2.0 Analysis Methodology
This study was performed in accordance with the standards and requirements in the TIAG. All analysis assumptions were documented within a scoping agreement memorandum, provided in Appendix B, and approved by the City of San Marcos. The following sections describe the analysis methods outlined in the TIAG to evaluate the traffic effect as a result of the Project in relation to LOS.

Level of Service (LOS) Definition
Level of Service (LOS) is a quantitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and the motorist’s and/or passengers’ perception of operations. A LOS definition generally describes these conditions in terms of such factors as delay, speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, interruptions in traffic flow, queuing, comfort, and convenience. Table 2.1 describes generalized definitions of the various LOS categories (A through F) as applied to roadway operations.

Table 2.1 - LOS Definitions
LOS Definition of Operation
A
This LOS represents a completely free-flow condition, where the operation of vehicles is virtually unaffected by the presence of other vehicles and only constrained by the geometric features of the highway and by driver preferences.

B
This LOS represents a relatively free-flow condition, although the presence of other vehicles becomes noticeable. Average travel speeds are the same as in LOS A, but drivers have slightly less freedom to maneuver.

C
At this LOS, the influence of traffic density on operations becomes marked. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is clearly affected by other vehicles.

D
At this LOS, the ability to maneuver is notably restricted due to traffic congestion, and only minor disruptions can be absorbed without extensive queues forming and the service deteriorating.

E
This LOS represents operations at or near capacity. LOS E is an unstable level, with vehicles operating with minimum spacing for maintaining uniform flow. At LOS E, disruptions cannot be dissipated readily thus causing deterioration down to LOS F.

F
At this LOS, forced or breakdown of traffic flow occurs, although operations appear to be at capacity, queues form behind these breakdowns. Operations within queues are highly unstable, with vehicles experiencing brief periods of movement followed by stoppages.

Source: Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition
Roadway Segment LOS Standards and Thresholds
Roadway segment LOS standards and thresholds provide the basis for analysis of arterial roadway segment performance. The analysis of roadway segment LOS is based on the functional classification of the roadway, the maximum capacity, roadway geometrics, and existing or forecast Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes. Table 2.2 displays roadway segment capacity standards found in the City’s TIAG. The actual capacity of a roadway facility varies according to its physical attributes.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 2.2 - Roadway Segment Daily Capacity and LOS Standards Street Classification
LOS/ADT Thresholds

A B C D E
Expressway (6-lane) < 30,000 < 42,000 < 60,000 < 70,000 < 80,000 Prime Arterial (6-lane) < 25,000 < 35,000 < 50,000 < 55,000 < 60,000 Major Arterial (6-lane, divided) < 20,000 < 28,000 < 40,000 < 45,000 < 50,000 Major Arterial (4-lane, divided) < 15,000 < 21,000 < 30,000 < 35,000 < 40,000 Major Arterial (3-lane, one-way) < 12,500 < 16,500 < 22,500 < 25,000 < 27,500 Major Arterial (2-lane, one-way) <10,000 <13,000 <17,500 <20,000 <22,500 Secondary Arterial/Collector
(4-lane w/ center lane) < 10,000 < 14,000 < 20,000 < 25,000 < 30,000 Collector (4-lane w/o center lane) < 5,000 < 7,000 < 10,000 < 13,000 < 15,000 Collector
(2-lane w/ continuous left-turn lane) < 5,000 < 7,000 < 10,000 < 13,000 < 15,000 Collector (2-lane no fronting property) < 4,000 < 5,500 < 7,500 < 9,000 < 10,000 Collector (2-lane w/commercial fronting) < 2,500 < 3,500 < 5,000 < 6,500 < 8,000 Collector (2-lane w/multi-family) < 2,500 < 3,500 < 5,000 < 6,500 < 8,000 Collector (3-lane, one-way) < 11,000 < 14,000 < 19,000 < 22,500 < 26,000 Collector (2-lane, one-way) < 7,500 < 9,500 < 12,500 < 15,000 < 17,500 Collector (1-lane, one-way) < 2,500 < 3,500 < 5,000 < 6,500 < 7,500 Sub-Collector (2-lane single family) - - < 2,200 - -
Source: City of San Marcos Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (November 2020) Note:

Bold number indicates the ADT thresholds for acceptable LOS.

These standards are generally used as long-range planning guidelines to determine the functional classification of roadways. The actual capacity of a roadway varies according to its physical attributes. Typically, the performance and LOS of a roadway segment is heavily influenced by the ability of its intersections to accommodate peak hour traffic volumes. For the purposes of this traffic analysis, LOS D or better is considered acceptable for circulation element roadway segments.

Peak Hour Intersection LOS Standards and Thresholds
This section presents the methodologies used to perform peak hour intersection capacity analyses at signalized and unsignalized intersections within the study area. The following assumptions were utilized in conducting all intersection LOS analyses:
 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) – Field-collected PHF for Existing and Near-Term Year 2024 Base Conditions. A PHF of 0.95 was assumed for Horizon Year 2050 analysis, except where the field-collected PHF exceeds 0.95.
 Lane Utilization Factor – HCM 6th Edition defaults were used for all scenarios.  Conflicting Pedestrians/Bicycles – Existing pedestrian and bicycle counts are utilized for all scenarios.
 Signal Timing – Based on existing signal timing plans (as of June 2022 and July 2022), provided in Appendix C.
 Heavy Vehicle Factor (HVF) – 2% for all approaches, except where designated truck routes are present. HVF for truck route approaches are based on Caltrans truck percentage data.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

2.3.1 Signalized Intersections
The analysis of signalized intersections utilized the operational analysis procedure as outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition signalized (Chapter 19) intersection analysis methodology. This method defines LOS in terms of delay, or more specifically, average stopped delay per vehicle. Delay is a measure of driver and/or passenger discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption and lost travel time. This technique uses 1,900 vehicles per hour per lane (VPHPL) as the maximum saturation volume of an intersection. This saturation volume is adjusted to account for lane width, on-street parking, pedestrians, traffic composition (i.e., percentage trucks) and shared lane movements (i.e., through and right-turn movements originating from the same lane). The LOS criteria used for the analysis of signalized intersections are described in Table 2.3, identifying the thresholds of control delays and the associated LOS. The computerized analysis of intersection operations was performed utilizing the Synchro Version 11 traffic analysis software by Trafficware Ltd.

Table 2.3 - Signalized Intersection LOS Operational Analysis Method Average Stopped
Delay Per Vehicle
(Seconds)
LOS Characteristics
<10
LOS A describes operations with very low delay. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay.
>10– 20 LOS B describes operations with generally good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. >20 – 35
LOS C describes operations with higher delays, which may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level.

The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping.
>35– 55
LOS D describes operations with high delay, resulting from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high volumes. The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable, and individual cycle failures are noticeable. >55 – 80 LOS E is considered the limit of acceptable delay. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences.
>80
LOS F describes a condition of excessively high delay, considered unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs when arrival flow rates exceed the LOS D capacity of the intersection. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay.

Source: HCM 6th Edition
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

2.3.2 Unsignalized Intersections
Unsignalized intersections were analyzed using the Highway Capacity 6th Edition side-street stop (Chapter 20) and all-way stop (Chapter 21) intersection analysis methodology. The computerized analysis of intersection operations was performed utilizing the Synchro Version 11 traffic analysis software by Trafficware Ltd.

LOS was determined as follows:
 All-way stop intersections: Reported for the entire intersection as an average value  Side-street stop intersections: Reported for the worst-case movement The LOS criteria used for the analysis of unsignalized intersections are described in Table 2.4.

Table 2.4 - LOS Criteria for Stop Controlled Unsignalized Intersections Average Stopped Delay Per Vehicle
(Seconds) LOS
0-10 A
> 10-15 B
> 15-25 C
> 25-35 D
> 35-50 E
> 50 F
Source: HCM 6th Edition
Determination of Project Study Area
Per the City’s TIAG, the study area was defined using the following criteria:
 Signalized and unsignalized intersections along and adjacent to the project site  Site access driveways
 Any classified (non-residential) roadway segments that are linked to the intersections that are being studied
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

City of San Marcos LOS Standards
This section outlines the Mobility Element Policies that are relevant to the Project. The City of San Marcos strives to maintain intersection and roadway segment operations LOS standards based on the following policy:
 Policy M-1.4: LOS D or better for Vehicles as a prioritized mode – Generally provides facilities that have minimum vehicle congestion during peak periods. Most motorists are delayed less than 55 seconds at a signal (or less than one signalized cycle).

Based on the policy listed above, LOS D or better is considered acceptable for study roadway segments and intersections. The TIAG provides the following thresholds to determine if the Project is required provide improvements for study area facilities:
 Implementation of the Project triggers a roadway segment operating at acceptable LOS to operate at unacceptable LOS and increases the volume/capacity (V/C) ratio by more than

0.02.  Implementation of the Project increases the V/C ratio for a study roadway segment that is already operating at unacceptable LOS by more than 0.02.  Implementation of the Project triggers an intersection operating at acceptable LOS to operate at unacceptable LOS and increases the average delay per vehicle by more than 2.0 seconds.  Implementation of the Project increases the average delay for a study intersection that is already operating at unacceptable LOS by more than 2.0 seconds.

Improvements should be identified to increase performance to acceptable or pre-project conditions under each scenario.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

3.0 Project Traffic
This chapter describes the Project’s trip generation, trip distribution patterns, and trip assignment.

Project Trip Generation
Per the City’s TIAG, trip generation rates were derived from SANDAG’s (not so) Brief Guide to Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002). It should be noted that the office space is intended for single tenant and the retail space is not intended to be occupied by grocery store uses or similar uses. Table 3.1 displays the projected daily, as well as AM and PM peak hour, project trip generation.

As shown, the Project is anticipated to generate a net total of 2,241 daily trips, including 126 trips (60-in/62-out) during the AM peak hour and 189 (101-in/89-out) during the PM peak hour.

Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
The project trip distribution was manually developed based on the following:
 Existing travel patterns obtained from big data (Replica1) and Census data  Geographical location of the Project, surrounding land uses, and knowledge of the City’s traffic patterns.

Appendix D includes a technical memorandum detailing the development of the project trip distribution. Since the Project features different land uses, separate trip distributions were developed. The office and retail components of the Project are assumed to have the same trip distribution since trips associated with these land uses would utilize Project Driveways #2, #3, and #4.

The residential component of the Project differs in trip distribution as it has different travel patterns than those associated with office and retail land uses. The Project proposes to construct 102 multifamily residential units that would be accessed via Project Driveway #1 along the west side (residential area) of the Project and 7 live/work units would be accessed along the east side (officeretail area) of the Project via Project Driveway #3. Although the seven live/work units are located within the office-retail area of the Project, the units are anticipated to have similar travel patterns as the typical residential units on the east side. Therefore, the trips associated with live/work units were assumed to be strictly residential trips and not included as part of the office or retail component of the Project. Figure 3.1A and Figure 3.1B display the regional trip distribution patterns for the residential component of the Project. Figure 3.2A and Figure 3.2B display the regional trip distribution patterns for the office and retail component of the Project.

Based upon the project trip distribution patterns, daily and AM/PM peak hour project trips were assigned to the adjacent roadway network. Figure 3.3A and Figure 3.3B display the project trip 1 Replica is a data provider that produces large-scale models to represent mobility throughout the United States. For more information, please visit the following: https://replicahq.com/.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

assignment for the residential component of the Project. Figure 3.4A and Figure 3.4B display the project trip assignment for the office and retail component of the Project. Figure 3.5A and Figure

3.5B display the project trip assignment for the combined land uses (total trip assignment).

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 3.1 - Project Trip Generation
Land Use Units Trip
Rate ADT
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
% Trips Split In Out % Trips Split In Out
Residential
Multi-Family
(>20 DU/acre) 109 DU 6/DU 654 8% 53 2:8 11 42 9% 59 7:3 41 18 Employment/Office
Single Tenant Office 7,658 SF 14/KSF 108 15% 17 9:1 15 2 15% 17 2:8 3 14 Commercial/Retail
Specialty Retail
Center/Strip Commercial 49,266 SF 40/KSF 1,971 3% 60 6:4 36 24 9% 178 5:5 89 89 Subtotal 2,733 - 130 - 62 68 - 254 - 133 121
Internal Capture1 (18%2) -492 - -4 - -2 -2 - -64 - -32 -32 Net Total 2,241 - 126 - 60 62 - 189 - 101 89
Source: CR Associates (2022)
Notes:
1 Internal capture was calculated using ITE’s trip reduction calculator, which is based on the NCHRP Report 664 Enhancing Internal Trip Capture Estimation for Mixed-Use Developments. See Appendix E for more details.
2 1 - [(AMNet Total + PMNet Total)/(AMSubtotal + PMSubtotal)] = 1 - [(126 + 189)/(130 + 254)] = 18% DU = Dwelling Unit.

KSF = 1,000 Square Feet
2%
70%
Project Site
20%
15%
42%
5%
25%
25%
15%
10%
15%
25%
10%
28%
20%
5%
20%
5%
5%
20%
10%
10%
10%
8 9
6 1
2 7
5 4
3 11
10 San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 3.1A
Project Trip Distribution
Residential
Linda Vista Dr
S Bent Ave
Grand Ave
W San Marcos Bl
0 500 1,000 Feet
S Las Posas Rd
Via Vera Cruz
Discovery St
Armorlite Dr
78 Trip Distribution
Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
#
XX%
Project
Dwy #1 Project
Dwy #1
Project
Dwy #1
Project
Dwy #1
28%
70%
70%
30%
40%
40%
42%
98%
2%
8 9
4 11
10 Legend
S Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue
S Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue SR-78 EB Ramps & Grand Avenue Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue Project Driveway #2 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #1 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #3
& Linda Vista Drive
Project Driveway #4
& Linda Vista Drive
Grand Avenue
& W San Marcos Boulevard
Via Vera Cruz
& W San Marcos Boulevard
5%
1%4%
30%
25%
26%
70%
20%
15%
40%
28%
10%
41%
28%
10%
20%
1%
1%
15%
41%
1%
15%5%
1%
26%
70%
5%
40%
1%
20%
5%
5%
25%
25%
70%
5%
70%
40%
1%
1%
20%
30%
25%
5%
1%
15%
40%
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 11
San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 3.1B
Project Trip Distribution
Residential
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Trip
Distribution
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first

AM / PM

NOT TO SCALE
X
15%
15%
Project Site
20%
15%
55%
5%
25%
25%
15%
10%
15%
25%
10%
15%
20%
5%
20%
5%
5%
20%
10%
10%
10%
8 9
6 1
2 7
5 4
3 11
10 San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 3.2A
Project Trip Distribution
Office and Retail
Linda Vista Dr
S Bent Ave
Grand Ave
W San Marcos Bl
0 500 1,000 Feet
S Las Posas Rd
Via Vera Cruz
Discovery St
Armorlite Dr
78 Trip Distribution
Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
#
XX%
Project
Dwy #1
Project
Dwy #2
Project
Project Dwy #4
Dwy #3
15%
15%
25%
30%
40%
40%
55%
20%
40%
40%
8 9
4 11
10 Legend
S Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue
S Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue SR-78 EB Ramps & Grand Avenue Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue Project Driveway #2 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #1 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #3
& Linda Vista Drive
Project Driveway #4
& Linda Vista Drive
Grand Avenue
& W San Marcos Boulevard
Via Vera Cruz
& W San Marcos Boulevard
6%
2%
3% 5%
23%
22%20%
18%
33%
15%
13%
12%
25%
24%
17%
10%
29%
5%
17%
6%
5%
18%
20%
25%
29%
3%
12%
15%
10%
15%
2%
3%
23%
15%
22%
15%
25%
3%
22%
25%
5%
5%
18%
33%
15%
12% 15%
22%
20%
15%
20%
18%
13%
5%
12%
24%
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 11
San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 3.2B
Project Trip Distribution
Office and Retail
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Trip
Distribution
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first

AM / PM

NOT TO SCALE
X
375
11 Project Site
107
80 225
27 134
134
81 53
80 134
54 150
107
27 107
27 27
107
54 53
54 8
9 6
1 2
7 5
4 3
11 10
San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 3.3A
Project Trip Assignment
Residential
Linda Vista Dr
S Bent Ave
Grand Ave
W San Marcos Bl
0 500 1,000 Feet
S Las Posas Rd
Via Vera Cruz
Discovery St
Armorlite Dr
78 150
375
375
161
214
214
225
525
11 Project
Dwy #1
Project
Dwy #2
Project
Project Dwy #4
Dwy #3
8 9
4 11
10 Trip Assignment
Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
#
XXX
Legend
S Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue
S Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue SR-78 EB Ramps & Grand Avenue Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue Project Driveway #2 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #1 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #3
& Linda Vista Drive
Project Driveway #4
& Linda Vista Drive
Grand Avenue
& W San Marcos Boulevard
Via Vera Cruz
& W San Marcos Boulevard 9 / 2 1 / 0
2 / 1
2 / 6
2 / 8
2 / 9
3 / 9
4 / 1
6 / 2
1 / 4
1 / 3
1 / 1
0 / 1
7 / 20 15 / 5
6 / 13
6 / 20
4 / 12
5 / 12
16 / 6
27 / 8
11 / 3
27 / 9
11 / 4
9 / 2
2 / 1
16 / 6
1 / 4 11 / 3
6 / 2
0 / 1
1 / 1
2 / 8
1 / 0
2 / 1
11 / 3
2 / 8
2 / 6
0 / 1
1 / 1
1 / 1
0 / 1
2 / 1
0 / 1
11 / 3
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 11
San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 3.3B
Project Trip Assignment
Residential
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Trip
Assignment
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first

AM / PM

NOT TO SCALE
X
255
256
Project Site
341
256
937
85 427
426
255
171
256
426
170
256
341
85 341
86 85
341
170
171
170
8 9
6 1
2 7
5 4
3 11
10 San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 3.4A
Project Trip Assignment
Office and Retail
Linda Vista Dr
S Bent Ave
Grand Ave
W San Marcos Bl
0 500 1,000 Feet
S Las Posas Rd
Via Vera Cruz
Discovery St
Armorlite Dr
78 #
Project
Dwy #1
Project
Dwy #2
Project
Project Dwy #4
Dwy #3
256
256
426
512
682
682
937
341
682
682
8 9
4 11
10 Trip Assignment
Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
#
XXX
Legend
S Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue
S Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue SR-78 EB Ramps & Grand Avenue Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue Project Driveway #2 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #1 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #3
& Linda Vista Drive
Project Driveway #4
& Linda Vista Drive
Grand Avenue
& W San Marcos Boulevard
Via Vera Cruz
& W San Marcos Boulevard
0 / 1
7 / 9 2 / 5 1 / 3
6 / 8
3 / 9
3 / 8
1 / 2
3 / 4
2 / 2
1 / 5
5 / 7
1 / 4
3 / 3
6 / 18
6 / 17
5 / 15
4 / 12
4 / 11
7 / 22
7 / 14
9 / 13
7 / 10
7 / 13
4 / 10
8 / 11
8 / 14
6 / 19
14 / 20
10 / 14
13 / 18
12 / 17
13 / 17
11 / 15
8 / 11
3 / 8
13 / 17
6 / 8
6 / 18
10 / 14
4 / 11
4 / 11
4 / 11
3 / 3
3 / 4
1 / 4
8 / 11
3 / 3
1 / 4
7 / 10 5 / 15
4 / 12
3 / 8
5 / 7
7 / 13
6 / 19
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 11
San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 3.4B
Project Trip Assignment
Office and Retail
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Trip
Assignment
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first

AM / PM

NOT TO SCALE
X
266
631
Project Site
448
336
1,162
112
561
560
336
224
336
560
224
406
448
112
448
113
112
448
224
224
224
8 9
6 1
2 7
5 4
3 11
10 San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 3.5A
Project Trip Assignment
Linda Vista Dr
S Bent Ave
Grand Ave
W San Marcos Bl
0 500 1,000 Feet
S Las Posas Rd
Via Vera Cruz
Discovery St
Armorlite Dr
78 #
Project
Dwy #1
Project
Dwy #2
Project
Project Dwy #4
Dwy #3
406
631
801
673
896
896
1,162
341
693
682
525
8 9
4 11
10 Trip Assignment
Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
#
XXX
Legend
S Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue
S Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue SR-78 EB Ramps & Grand Avenue Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue Project Driveway #2 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #1 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #3
& Linda Vista Drive
Project Driveway #4
& Linda Vista Drive
Grand Avenue
& W San Marcos Boulevard
Via Vera Cruz
& W San Marcos Boulevard 3 / 5
7 / 9
1 / 3
6 / 8
2 / 2
3 / 9
3 / 8
3 / 4
1 / 1
2 / 5
1 / 5
3 / 3
5 / 12
5 / 10
13 / 8
8 / 12
5 / 13
4 / 12
9 / 17
6 / 17
9 / 13
8 / 22
6 / 207 / 19
7 / 10
27 / 8
9 / 15
6 / 10
4 / 11
11 / 4
12 / 20
14 / 21
10 / 13
10 / 28
23 / 19
12 / 17
12 / 25
13 / 27
14 / 17
21 / 23
15 / 14
15 / 25
17 / 30
17 / 22
10 / 12
11 / 15
24 / 20
32 / 16
9 / 153 / 5
17 / 22
7 / 10
12 / 20
3 / 43 / 4
4 / 11
7 / 9
3 / 4
14 / 17
15 / 25
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 11
San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 3.5B
Project Trip Assignment
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Trip
Assignment
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first

AM / PM

NOT TO SCALE
X
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Project Study Area
Based on the study area criteria previously outlined in Chapter 2, the project trip assignment shown in Figures 3.5A and 3.5B, and the preliminary project scoping with City of San Marcos staff, the following roadway segments and intersections were included for analysis:

Roadway Segments
 Via Vera Cruz, between Grand Avenue and Linda Vista Drive  Via Vera Cruz, between Linda Vista Drive and West San Marcos Boulevard  Grand Avenue, between Las Posas Road and Via Vera Cruz  Grand Avenue, between Via Vera Cruz and Linda Vista Drive  Grand Avenue, between Linda Vista Drive and West San Marcos Boulevard  Linda Vista Drive, between Via Vera Cruz and Grand Avenue  West San Marcos Boulevard, between Via Vera Cruz and South Bent Avenue  West San Marcos Boulevard, between South Bent Avenue and Grand Avenue Intersections

1. South Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue

2. SR-78 EB Ramps/Via Vera Cruz & Grand Avenue

3. Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive

4. Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue

5. South Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue

6. Via Vera Cruz & West San Marcos Boulevard

7. Grand Avenue & West San Marcos Boulevard

8. Project Driveway #1 & Grand Avenue

9. Project Driveway #2 & Grand Avenue

10. Project Driveway #3 & Linda Vista Drive

11. Project Driveway #4 & Linda Vista Drive
Figure 3.6 displays the overall project study area.
8 9
6 1
2 7
5 4
3 11
10 San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 3.6
Project Study Area
Linda Vista Dr
S Bent Ave
Grand Ave
W San Marcos Bl
0 250 500 Feet
Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
S Las Posas Rd
Via Vera Cruz
Armorlite Dr
Project
Dwy #2
Project Project Dwy #4 Dwy #3
Project
Dwy #1
78 #
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

4.0 Active Transportation Evaluation
This section discusses the project site’s active transportation modes.

Transit Access
The project site is within one half mile of the transit lines serviced by North County Transit District (NCTD) described below:
 Bus Route 347 – This bus route is serviced along West Mission Road and North Las Posas Road within the project study area. This bus route connects the Palomar College Transit Center to the CSU San Marcos SPRINTER Station. Operations starts at 5:31 AM and ends at 7:21 PM between Monday and Friday with 30-minute intervals. On Saturdays, operations start at 7:22 AM and ends at 7:08 PM with 60-minute intervals. This route does not operate on Sundays.
 Bus Route 445 – This bus route is serviced along West Mission Road and North Las Posas Road within the project study area. This bus route connects the Palomar College Transit Center to the Carlsbad Poinsettia Station (COASTER Connection). Between Monday and Friday, operations start at 6:34 AM and ends at 10:19 AM with 30-minute intervals for the morning period. Similarly, between Monday and Friday, operates start at 3:36 PM and ends at 7:19 PM with 30-minutes intervals for the afternoon period. This route does not operate on Saturdays or Sundays.
 SPRINTER – This light rail line runs between Oceanside Transit Center and Escondido Transit Center (eastbound and westbound direction). The nearest stop to the project site is the Palomar College Transit Center. Operation starts at 4:17 AM and ends at 9:10 PM between Monday and Sunday with 30-minute intervals.

Based on the preliminary review of the project site plan, the Project would not conflict with existing or planned transit facilities and would not result in any impacts to transit facilities.

Bicycle
Under Existing conditions, there are no Class II bicycle facilities along project frontage. However, per the City of San Marcos General Plan, there are planned Class II bicycle facilities along the segments of Grand Avenue and Linda Vista Drive fronting the Project. Based on the preliminary review of the project site plan, the Project would construct a Class I bike path at its project frontage along the segments of Linda Vista Drive and Grand Avenue.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Pedestrian
Sidewalks are proposed along the segments of Grand Avenue and Linda Vista Drive fronting the Project. Sidewalks are also proposed throughout the internal roadways providing direct access to dwelling units, office and commercial buildings, and other on-site amenities.

Based on the preliminary review of the project site plan, the following recommendation is provided:
 Reconstruct curb ramps located along project driveways, if needed, to include detectable surface warning tactiles (yellow truncated domes) and meet all ADA requirements.

Implementation of the recommendation above should enhance the walkability and safety of the overall pedestrian environment and would not result in any impacts to pedestrian facilities.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

5.0 Existing Conditions
This chapter provides a qualitative description of the transportation facilities located in the project study area. A LOS analysis of the existing operations of the local transportation network facilities is also provided for study roadway segments and intersections.

Existing Transportation Network
Access to the Project from the regional transportation network will be provided via California State Route 78 (SR-78) freeway, Via Vera Cruz, Grand Avenue, Linda Vista Drive, and West San Marcos Boulevard. These facilities will either provide a direct connection to the Project, via a project driveway, or will provide a critical link between the Project and the regional transportation network.

Table 5.1 summarizes the existing physical characteristics of roadways within the study area. Figure

5.1 displays the functional classifications for study roadway segments and Figure 5.2 displays the intersection geometrics for study intersections under Existing conditions.

Existing Intersection Volumes
Traffic counts for study roadway segments and intersections were conducted on May 19, 2022, by Elite Traffic Dynamics, LLC. Traffic count worksheets are provided in Appendix F. To ensure that current travel patterns reflect traffic conditions prior to the COVID-19 restrictions, a count validation was conducted by comparing May 2022 traffic counts with historical traffic counts from November 2017 and May 2018. Historical traffic counts were obtained from the traffic study for the Bent Avenue Panera Bread project prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers in December 2018.

Based on the comparison it was determined that May 2022 traffic counts were greater than historical traffic counts. Thus, the May 2022 traffic counts were deemed appropriate to use for Existing conditions. Figure 5.3A displays existing daily traffic volumes for study roadway segments and Figure 5.3B displays the AM/PM peak hour turning movements for study intersections.

Existing Traffic Conditions
LOS analyses under Existing conditions were conducted using the methodologies described in Chapter 2. Roadway segment and intersection LOS analysis results are discussed below.

5.3.1 Roadway Segment Analysis
Table 5.2 displays roadway segment and LOS analysis results for study roadway segments under Existing conditions.

As shown, all study roadway segments currently operate at acceptable LOS D or better under Existing conditions, with the exception of the following roadway segment:
 West San Marcos Boulevard, between Via Vera Cruz and South Bent Avenue – LOS E. 216
2-Ln
Collector
4-Ln
Collector
5-Ln
Major Arterial
4-Ln
Major Arterial
4-Ln
Collector
4-Ln
Collector
4-Ln
Collector
4-Ln
Collector
8 9
6 1
2 7
5 4
3 11
10 San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 5.1
Functional Classifications
Existing Conditions
Linda Vista Dr
Bent Ave
Grand Ave
W San Marcos Bl
0 250 500 Feet Functional Classification
S Las Posas Rd
Via Vera Cruz
Armorlite Dr
78 #
X-Ln
Legend
S Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue
S Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue SR-78 EB Ramps & Grand Avenue Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue Project Driveway #2 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #1 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #3
& Linda Vista Drive
Project Driveway #4
& Linda Vista Drive
Grand Avenue
& W San Marcos Boulevard
Via Vera Cruz
& W San Marcos Boulevard

 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
   
   
   
   
   
    
    
     
 
  
  
  
  
 
  
   
    
5 6 7
1 2 3 4
San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 5.2
Intersection Geometrics
Existing Conditions
Stop Sign
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first NOT TO SCALE
Study Intersection
Signalized Intersection
Lane Geometry
X

38,635
4,168
7,846
8,258
11,093
10,169
20,993
38,635
6 1
2 7
5 4
3 San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 5.3A
Traffic Volumes
Existing Conditions
Linda Vista Dr
S Bent Ave
Grand Ave
W San Marcos Bl
0 250 500 Feet
S Las Posas Rd
Via Vera Cruz
Armorlite Dr
78 #
XXX Daily Traffic Volumes
Legend
S Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue
S Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue SR-78 EB Ramps & Grand Avenue Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue Project Driveway #2 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #1 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #3
& Linda Vista Drive
Project Driveway #4
& Linda Vista Drive
Grand Avenue
& W San Marcos Boulevard
Via Vera Cruz
& W San Marcos Boulevard
8 / 8
9 / 15
8 / 384 / 14
4 / 538 / 74
33 / 77
44 / 9813 / 68
44 / 43
15 / 20
16 / 24
42 / 76
37 / 88
19 / 72
21 / 33
21 / 35
21 / 38
22 / 42
22 / 45
33 / 70
34 / 2610 / 41
19 / 24
17 / 60
14 / 52
109 / 61 11 / 17 156 / 92 95 / 236 39 / 177
45 / 134
82 / 295
61 / 146
56 / 206
50 / 187
53 / 174
54 / 205
85 / 222
92 / 17337 / 13832 / 118
96 / 186
130 / 84
104 / 237
254 / 614
112 / 344
130 / 170
163 / 128 148 / 309
174 / 300
186 / 355
191 / 553
368 / 611
357 / 459
258 / 876
251 / 273
245 / 390
108 / 311
255 / 249242 / 303
271 / 771
238 / 206
359 / 310
202 / 366 453 / 260 621 / 525
427 / 294
851 / 1282
1250 / 1104
1055 / 1359
1364 / 1103
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 11
San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 5.3B
Traffic Volumes
Existing Conditions
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first

AM / PM

NOT TO SCALE
X
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 5.1 - Existing Transportation Network Characteristics Roadway Segment Number of
Lanes
Median
Type
Posted
Speed Limit Sidewalk? Bike lanes? TransitRoute
Via Vera Cruz Grand Avenue to Linda
Vista Drive 2 NB / 2 SB CLTL/RM 40 Contiguous Class IIBike Lanes None Via Vera Cruz Linda Vista Drive to West
San Marcos Boulevard 2 NB / 2 SB CLTL 40
East Side:

Intermittently contiguous
West Side:

Contiguous
Class II
Bike Lanes None
Grand Avenue Las Posas Road to Via
Vera Cruz 2 EB / 2 WB Striped 45
North Side:

None
South Side:

Contiguous
None None
Grand Avenue Via Vera Cruz to Linda
Vista Drive 2 EB / 2 WB CLTL 45
North Side:

None
South Side:

Intermittently contiguous
None None
Grand Avenue Linda Vista Drive to West
San Marcos Boulevard 2 EB / 2 WB CLTL 45
North Side:

None
South Side:

Intermittently contiguous
None None
Linda Vista Drive Via Vera Cruz to Grand
Avenue 1 EB / 1 WB None 40 Intermittently Contiguous None None West San Marcos
Boulevard
Via Vera Cruz to South
Bent Avenue 2 EB / 2 WB RM 40 Contiguous Class IIBikes Lanes 347 West San Marcos
Boulevard
South Bent Avenue to
Grand Avenue 3 EB / 2 WB RM 40 Contiguous Class IIBikes Lanes 347 Source: CR Associates (2022)
Notes:

RM = Raised Median
CLTL = Center Left-Turn Lane
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 5.2 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Existing Conditions Roadway Segment Functional Classification Roadway
Capacity
Daily
Volume V/C LOS
Via Vera Cruz Grand Avenue to Linda Vista Drive 4-Lane Secondary Arterial/Collector 30,000 8,258 0.275 A
Via Vera Cruz Linda Vista Drive to West San Marcos
Boulevard
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 7,846 0.262 A
Grand Avenue South Las Posas Road to Via Vera Cruz 4-Lane Secondary Arterial/Collector 30,000 20,993 0.700 D
Grand Avenue Via Vera Cruz to Linda Vista Drive 4-Lane Secondary Arterial/Collector 30,000 10,169 0.339 B
Grand Avenue Linda Vista Drive to West San Marcos
Boulevard
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 11,093 0.370 B
Linda Vista Drive Via Vera Cruz to Grand Avenue 2-Lane Collector (Commercial/Industrial Fronting) 8,000 4,168 0.521 B
West San Marcos
Boulevard Via Vera Cruz to South Bent Avenue 4-Lane Major Arterial 40,000 38,750 0.966 E West San Marcos
Boulevard South Bent Avenue to Grand Avenue 5-Lane Major Arterial 50,000 38,750 0.773 D Source: CR Associates (2022)
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

5.3.2 Intersection Analysis
Table 5.3 displays intersection LOS and average vehicle delay results for the study intersections under Existing conditions. LOS calculation worksheets for Existing conditions are provided in Appendix G.

As shown, all study intersections currently operate at acceptable LOS D or better under Existing conditions, with the exception of the following intersection:
 SR-78 EB Ramps/Via Vera Cruz & Grand Avenue – LOS E during the PM peak hour.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 5.3 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Existing Conditions # Intersection Control Type Peak Hour Avg. Delay (sec.) LOS 1 South Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue Signal AM 31.6 C
PM 39.1 D
2 SR-78 EB Ramps/Via Vera Cruz & Grand Avenue Signal AM 49.0 D PM 57.6 E
3 Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive Signal AM 16.4 B
PM 19.9 B
4 Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue SSSC AM 10.2 B
PM 19.3 C
5 South Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue Signal AM 7.8 A
PM 11.3 B
6 Via Vera Cruz & West San Marcos Boulevard Signal AM 18.8 B PM 50.8 D
7 Grand Avenue & West San Marcos Boulevard Signal AM 34.2 C PM 46.7 D
Source: CR Associates (2022)
Notes:

Bold indicates LOS E or F.

SSSC = Side-Street Stop-Controlled. For SSSC intersections, the delay shown is the worst delay experienced by any of the approaches.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

6.0 Near-Term Year 2024 Conditions
This section provides an analysis of Near-Term Year 2024 Base traffic conditions both with and without the Project. The scenarios analyzed in this section include:
 Near-Term Year 2024 Base
 Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project
Cumulative Project Traffic
The following ten (10) projects were identified by City of San Marcos staff as cumulative projects, since they are anticipated to contribute traffic within the project study area by the Project’s opening year:

1. Pacific Commercial – This project is located at the northeast corner of the Grand Avenue and Pacific Street intersection. This project proposes to construct a 122-room hotel.

2. San Marcos Highlands – This project is located at the north end of Las Posas Road. This project proposes to construct 187 single-family residential dwelling units as well as a 21.68- acre passive park.

3. El Dorado II Specific Plan – This project is located at the southwest corner of the Richmar Avenue and Pleasant Way intersection. This project proposes to construct 72 multi-family dwelling units as well as 2,000 square feet of specialty retail.

4. Villa Serena – This project is located the northwest corner of the Richmar Avenue and Marcos Street intersection. This project proposes to construct 12 multi-family dwelling units.

5. Mariposa (Phase 1) – This project is located at the northeast corner of the Richmar Avenue and Los Olivos Drive intersection. This project proposes to develop 60 multi-family dwelling units.

6. Murai Subdivision – This project is located at the north end of Las Posas Road. This project proposes to construct 89 single-family residential dwelling units.

7. Pacifica San Marcos – This project is located at the southeast corner of the Rancho Santa Fe Road and 9th Street intersection. This project proposes to construct 31 multi-family dwelling units as well as 4,375 square feet of commercial use.

8. Karl Strauss Brewery – This project is located at the southeast corner of the North Las Posas Road and Armorlite Drive intersection. This project proposes to construct 10,528 square feet of uses that include a tasting room, commercial kitchen, and entertainment room.

9. Gran Vista Multi-Family – This project is located 250 feet northwest of the West Mission Road & North Las Posas Road intersection. This project proposes to construct 120 multifamily dwelling units.

10. Hughes Circuits – This project is located 650 feet south of the South Pacific Street & Linda Vista Drive intersection. This project proposes to construct 8,000 SF of office, 44,410 SF of warehouse, and 15,000 SF of manufacturing.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

The traffic generated from the projects listed above was included in the Near-Term Year 2024 Base scenario. Figure 6.1 displays the location of the cumulative projects identified above.

Cumulative Project Trip Generation
Cumulative project traffic was assigned to the project study area as identified within their respective traffic studies provided by the City of San Marcos. Cumulative project traffic for cumulative projects without completed traffic studies were estimated and assigned to the project study area utilizing the same methodology used for the Project, described in Chapter 3.0, consistent with the City’s TIAG.

Based on the obtained and assumed trip distribution patterns, only a few cumulative projects carry trips through the project study area. These trips primarily travel along S Las Posas Road, Grand Avenue, and W San Marcos Boulevard. Table 6.1 displays the projected trip generation for the cumulative projects. Figure 6.2A displays the daily cumulative project trip assignment for study roadway segments and Figure 6.2B displays the AM/PM peak hour cumulative project trip assignment for study intersections. Relevant excerpts from the source of information regarding the cumulative project are provided in Appendix H.

Table 6.1 - Cumulative Project Trip Generation
Cumulative Project Land Use Daily
Trips
AM Peak Hour
(In/Out)
AM Peak Hour
(In/Out)
Pacific Commercial Hotel 854 69
(28-in/41-out)
77 (46-in/31-out)
San Marcos
Highlands1
Single Family Residential/Passive
Park 1,998 165(52-in/113-out)
199
(137-in/62-out)
El Dorado II Specific
Plan
Multi-Family Residential/Specialty
Retail 512 38(9-in/29-out)
47 (31-in/16-out)
Villa Serena Multi-Family Residential 96 8
(2-in/6-out)
10 (7-in/3-out)
Mariposa (Phase 1) Multi-Family Residential 360 29
(6-in/23-out)
33 (23-in/10-out)
Murai Subdivision2 Single Family Residential 890 71
(21-in/50-out)
89 (62-in/27-out)
Pacifica San Marcos Multi-Family Residential/Specialty
Retail 361 21(7-in/14-out)
33 (20-in/13-out)
Karl Strauss
Brewery Brewery/Restaurant 1,685 135(68-in/67-out)
135
(81-in/54-out)
Gran Vista MultiFamily3 Multi-Family Residential 960 77 (15-in/62-out)
96 (67-in/29-out)
Hughes Circuits4 Office, Warehouse, Manufacturing 348 38 (32-in/6-out)
43 (9-in/34-out)
Total 8,064 651
(240-in/411-out)
762
(483-in/279-out)
Source: SANDAG (not so) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002) Notes:
1 Trip generation obtained from the San Marcos Highlands Traffic Impact Analysis Report prepared by RBF Consulting (February 2015) 2 Trip generation obtained from the Murai Subdivision Traffic Impact Analysis Report prepared by STC Traffic Inc (April 2017) 3 Trip generation obtained from the Gran Vista Multi-Family Transportation Impact Analysis Report prepared by CR Associates (February 2023)
4 Trip generation obtained from the Hughes Circuits Transportation Impact Analysis Report prepared by CR Associates (March 2023) S Las Posas Rd
Grand Av
W Mission Rd
W Borden Rd
W San Marcos Bl
N Las Posas Rd
Linda Vista Dr
S Santa Fe Av
S Bent Av

DISCOVERY ST
Glendale Av
San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 6.1
Cumulative Project Locations
0 1,000 2,000 Feet
78 Cumulative Project Location
Project Site
Karl Strauss
Brewery
Pacific San Marcos Pacific Commercial
Mariposa (Phase 1)
Villa Serena
El Dorado II
Specific Plan
Murai Subdivision
San Marcos Highlands
Gran Vista Multi-Family
Hughes Circuits
90 145
108
1,506
108
90 145
6 1
2 7
5 4
3 San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 6.2A
Cumulative Project Trip Assignment
Linda Vista Dr
S Bent Ave
Grand Ave
W San Marcos Bl
0 250 500 Feet
S Las Posas Rd
Via Vera Cruz
Armorlite Dr
78 #
XXX Cumulative Project Trip Assignment
Legend
S Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue
S Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue SR-78 EB Ramps & Grand Avenue Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue Project Driveway #2 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #1 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #3
& Linda Vista Drive
Project Driveway #4
& Linda Vista Drive
Grand Avenue
& W San Marcos Boulevard
Via Vera Cruz
& W San Marcos Boulevard
7 / 3
1 / 4
1 / 5
1 / 8
6 / 92 / 7
8 / 6
3 / 2
73 / 52
43 / 93 24 / 52
16 / 2143 / 27
19 / 17
73 / 4650 / 91
3 / 2
6 / 9 1 / 4
1 / 8
3 / 2
7 / 3
2 / 7 1 / 4
7 / 3
1 / 4
2 / 7
7 / 3 7 / 3
8 / 6
3 / 2
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 11
San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 6.2B
Cumulative Project Trip Assignment
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Trip
Assignment
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first

AM / PM

NOT TO SCALE
X
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

As shown, the cumulative projects are anticipated to generate 8,064 daily trips, including 651 trips during the AM peak hour and 762 trips during the PM peak hour, that will be dispersed throughout the San Marcos community and beyond the project study area.

Near-Term Year 2024 Base Roadway Network and
Traffic Volumes
Roadway segment functional classifications and intersection geometrics under Near-Term Year 2024 Base conditions were assumed to be identical to Existing conditions (Figure 5.1 and Figure 5.2). The Near-Term Year 2024 Base scenario traffic volumes were derived by adding the additional trips generated by the cumulative projects listed in Section 6.1 (Figure 6.2A and Figure 6.2B) to the existing traffic volumes (Figure 5.3A and Figure 5.3B). Figure 6.3A displays projected daily traffic volumes for study roadway segments and Figure 6.3B displays the projected AM/PM peak hour turning movements for study intersections under Near-Term Year 2024 Base conditions.

Near-Term Year 2024 Base Traffic Conditions
LOS analyses under Near-Term Year 2024 Base conditions were conducted using the methodologies described in Chapter 2. Roadway segment and intersection LOS analysis results are discussed below.

6.4.1 Roadway Segment Analysis
Table 6.2 displays roadway segment LOS analysis results for study roadway segments under NearTerm Year 2024 Base conditions.

As shown, all study roadway segments are projected to operate at acceptable LOS D or better under Near-Term Year 2024 Base conditions, with the exception of the following roadway segment:
 West San Marcos Boulevard, between Via Vera Cruz and South Bent Avenue – LOS E.

6.4.2 Intersection Analysis
Table 6.3 displays intersection LOS and average vehicle delay results for the study intersections under Near-Term Year 2024 Base conditions. LOS calculation worksheets for Near-Term Year 2024 Base conditions are provided in Appendix I.

As shown, all study intersections are projected to operate at acceptable LOS D or better under NearTerm Year 2024 Base conditions, with the exception of the following intersection:
 SR-78 EB Ramps/Via Vera Cruz & Grand Avenue – LOS E during the AM peak hour and LOS F during the PM peak hour.
38,750
4,170
8,000
8,410
11,190
10,260
22,500
38,750
6 1
2 7
5 4
3 San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 6.3A
Traffic Volumes
Near-Term Year 2024 Base Conditions
Linda Vista Dr
S Bent Ave
Grand Ave
W San Marcos Bl
0 250 500 Feet
S Las Posas Rd
Via Vera Cruz
Armorlite Dr
78 #
XXX Daily Traffic Volumes
Legend
S Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue
S Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue SR-78 EB Ramps & Grand Avenue Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue Project Driveway #2 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #1 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #3
& Linda Vista Drive
Project Driveway #4
& Linda Vista Drive
Grand Avenue
& W San Marcos Boulevard
Via Vera Cruz
& W San Marcos Boulevard
8 / 8
9 / 15
8 / 384 / 14
6 / 608 / 74
44 / 98
44 / 91
13 / 68
15 / 20
44 / 4316 / 24
42 / 76
19 / 72
21 / 33
21 / 35
22 / 45 21 / 38
33 / 77
28 / 51
33 / 70
22 / 58
34 / 26
19 / 24
17 / 60
11 / 17
10 / 41
109 / 6196 / 241156 / 92
39 / 177
45 / 134
84 / 302
61 / 146
58 / 21353 / 174
53 / 189
54 / 205
85 / 222
92 / 17337 / 13833 / 122
96 / 186
130 / 84
104 / 237
112 / 344
252 / 277
137 / 173
169 / 137 149 / 313
177 / 302
187 / 359
191 / 553
430 / 511
411 / 704 282 / 928
127 / 328 257 / 616 255 / 249 249 / 306
274 / 773
245 / 390
238 / 206
210 / 372 469 / 281 664 / 552
432 / 356477 / 385
852 / 1290
1257 / 1107
1056 / 1367
1371 / 1106
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 11
San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 6.3B
Traffic Volumes
Near-Term Year 2024 Base Conditions
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first

AM / PM

NOT TO SCALE
X
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 6.2 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Near-Term Year 2024 Base Conditions Roadway Segment Functional Classification Roadway
Capacity
Daily
Volume V/C LOS
Via Vera Cruz Grand Avenue to Linda Vista Drive 4-Lane Secondary Arterial/Collector 30,000 8,260 0.275 A
Via Vera Cruz Linda Vista Drive to West San Marcos
Boulevard
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 7,850 0.262 A
Grand Avenue South Las Posas Road to Via Vera Cruz 4-Lane Secondary Arterial/Collector 30,000 22,500 0.750 D
Grand Avenue Via Vera Cruz to Linda Vista Drive 4-Lane Secondary Arterial/Collector 30,000 10,170 0.339 B
Grand Avenue Linda Vista Drive to West San Marcos
Boulevard
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 11,100 0.370 B
Linda Vista Drive Via Vera Cruz to Grand Avenue 2-Lane Collector (Commercial/Industrial Fronting) 8,000 4,170 0.521 C
West San Marcos
Boulevard Via Vera Cruz to South Bent Avenue 4-Lane Major Arterial 40,000 38,750 0.969 E West San Marcos
Boulevard South Bent Avenue to Grand Avenue 5-Lane Major Arterial 50,000 38,750 0.775 D Source: CR Associates (2022)
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 6.3 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Near-Term Year 2024 Base Conditions # Intersection Control Type Peak Hour Avg. Delay (sec.) LOS 1 South Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue Signal AM 31.7 C
PM 39.8 D
2 SR-78 EB Ramps/Via Vera Cruz & Grand Avenue Signal AM 65.3 E PM 89.2 F
3 Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive Signal AM 16.4 B
PM 19.9 B
4 Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue SSSC AM 10.1 B
PM 17.9 C
5 South Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue Signal AM 7.8 A
PM 11.3 B
6 Via Vera Cruz & West San Marcos Boulevard Signal AM 19.3 B PM 51.2 D
7 Grand Avenue & West San Marcos Boulevard Signal AM 34.2 C PM 47.2 D
Source: CR Associates (2022)
Notes:

Bold indicates LOS E or F.

SSSC = Side-Street Stop-Controlled. For SSSC intersections, the delay shown is the worst delay experienced by any of the approaches.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project Roadway
Network and Traffic Volumes
Roadway segment functional classifications and intersection geometrics under Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project conditions were assumed to be identical to Near-Term Year 2024 Base conditions.

Traffic volumes for Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project conditions were derived by combining the project trips (Figure 3.5A and Figure 3.5B) to the Near-Term Year 2024 Base traffic volumes (Figure

6.3A and Figure 6.3B). Figure 6.4A displays the projected daily traffic volumes for study roadway segments and Figure 6.4B displays the projected AM/PM peak hour turning movements for study intersections under Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project conditions.

Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project Traffic
Conditions
LOS analyses under Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project conditions were conducted using the methodologies described in Chapter 2. Roadway segment and intersection LOS analysis results are discussed below.

6.6.1 Roadway Segment Analysis
Table 6.4 displays roadway segment LOS analysis results for study roadway segments under NearTerm Year 2024 Base with Project conditions.

As shown, all study roadway segments are projected to operate at acceptable LOS D or better under Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project conditions, with the exception of the following roadway segment:
 West San Marcos Boulevard, between Via Vera Cruz and South Bent Avenue – The roadway segment is projected to operate at LOS E under Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project conditions. The roadway segment is already operating at substandard LOS under Near-Term Year 2024 Base conditions and the Project does not add any daily traffic along this segment.

This roadway segment is projected to operate at unacceptable LOS prior to the implementation of the Project. Project traffic would not increase the V/C ratio for this roadway segment by more than

0.02. Therefore, no study roadway segments are anticipated to degrade in LOS to unacceptable levels with implementation of the Project and no improvements will be required. 38,750
5,316
8,573
8,639
11,763
10,718
23,188
4,972
4,858
10,718
38,750
10,718
8 9
6 1
2 7
5 4
3 11
10 San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 6.4A
Traffic Volumes
Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project Conditions
Linda Vista Dr
S Bent Ave
Grand Ave
W San Marcos Bl
0 250 500 Feet
S Las Posas Rd
Via Vera Cruz
Armorlite Dr
Project
Dwy #2
Project Project Dwy #4 Dwy #3
Project
Dwy #1
78 #
XXX Daily Traffic Volumes
Legend
S Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue
S Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue SR-78 EB Ramps & Grand Avenue Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue Project Driveway #2 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #1 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #3
& Linda Vista Drive
Project Driveway #4
& Linda Vista Drive
Grand Avenue
& W San Marcos Boulevard
Via Vera Cruz
& W San Marcos Boulevard
8 / 8
7 / 9
3 / 9
0 / 0
3 / 4
1 / 5
9 / 13
8 / 22
7 / 10
5 / 104 / 126 / 17
6 / 20
4 / 11
9 / 648 / 7411 / 427 / 8
58 / 60
11 / 17 13 / 68
14 / 21
16 / 24
16 / 39
47 / 96
44 / 98
19 / 72
21 / 33
21 / 35
21 / 38
42 / 76
38 / 39
23 / 63
34 / 65
28 / 51
33 / 77
33 / 70
34 / 26
28 / 39
23 / 35
11 / 15
17 / 60
17 / 51
22 / 58
56 / 194
61 / 146
109 / 61
54 / 177
45 / 134
39 / 177
96 / 24161 / 22184 / 302
54 / 205
140 / 96 36 / 126
88 / 225
95 / 17737 / 138
98 / 191
113 / 252
119 / 363
267 / 302
133 / 388 129 / 385
143 / 181
164 / 327
168 / 109
176 / 146
186 / 319
192 / 136
192 / 372
430 / 511
196 / 386
201 / 401
205 / 570
421 / 717 282 / 928
280 / 648
127 / 328 270 / 624 256 / 250
250 / 226
249 / 306
245 / 390
291 / 795
304 / 652
216 / 382
195 / 133
469 / 281664 / 552441 / 371477 / 385
852 / 1290
1257 / 1107
1056 / 1367
1371 / 1106
0 / 0
0 / 0
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 11
San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 6.4B
Traffic Volumes
Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project Conditions
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first

AM / PM

NOT TO SCALE
X
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 6.4 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project Conditions Roadway Segment Functional
Classification
Roadway
Capacity
Near-Term Year 2024 with
Project
Near-Term Year 2024
without Project
Δ V/C
Daily
Volume V/C LOS DailyVolume V/C LOS
Via Vera Cruz
Grand Avenue to Linda
Vista Drive
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 8,676 0.289 A 8,260 0.275 A 0.009 Via Vera Cruz
Linda Vista Drive to West
San Marcos Boulevard
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 8,560 0.285 A 7,850 0.262 A 0.019 Grand Avenue
South Las Posas Road to
Via Vera Cruz
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 23,060 0.769 D 22,500 0.750 D 0.019 Grand Avenue
Via Vera Cruz to Project
Driveway #1
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 10,666 0.356 B 10,170 0.339 B 0.014 Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #1 to
Project Driveway #2
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 10,891 0.363 B 10,170 0.339 B 0.021 Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #2 to
Linda Vista Drive
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 11,061 0.369 B 10,170 0.339 B 0.027 Grand Avenue
Linda Vista Drive to West
San Marcos Boulevard
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 11,863 0.395 B 11,100 0.370 B 0.022 Linda Vista Drive
Via Vera Cruz to Project
Driveway #3
2-Lane Collector
(Commercial/Industrial
Fronting)
8,000 5,332 0.667 D 4,170 0.521 C 0.145
Linda Vista Drive
Project Driveway #3 to
Project Driveway #4
2-Lane Collector
(Commercial/Industrial
Fronting)
8,000 5,066 0.633 D 4,170 0.521 C 0.112
Linda Vista Drive
Project Driveway #4 to
Grand Avenue
2-Lane Collector
(Commercial/Industrial
Fronting)
8,000 5,066 0.633 D 4,170 0.521 C 0.112
West San Marcos
Boulevard
Via Vera Cruz to South
Bent Avenue 4-Lane Major Arterial 40,000 38,750 0.775 E 38,750 0.775 E 0.000 West San Marcos
Boulevard
South Bent Avenue to
Grand Avenue 5-Lane Major Arterial 50,000 38,750 0.969 D 38,750 0.969 D 0.000 Source: CR Associates (2022)
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

6.6.2 Intersection Analysis
Table 6.5 displays intersection LOS and average vehicle delay results for study area intersections under Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project Conditions. LOS calculation worksheets for Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project conditions are provided in Appendix J.

As shown, all study intersections are projected to operate at acceptable LOS D or better under NearTerm Year 2024 Base with Project conditions, with the exception of the following intersection:
 SR-78 EB Ramps/Via Vera Cruz & Grand Avenue – LOS E during the AM peak hour and LOS F during the PM peak hour. The intersection is already operating at substandard LOS under Near-Term Year 2024 Base conditions and the Project adds 0.7 seconds of delay during the AM peak hour and 0.1 seconds of delay during the PM peak hour.

This intersection is projected to operate at unacceptable LOS prior to the implementation of the Project. Project traffic would not increase the overall average delay at this intersection by more than

2.0 seconds. Therefore, no study intersections are anticipated to degrade in LOS to unacceptable levels with implementation of the Project and no improvements will be required.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 6.5 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project Conditions # Intersection Control Type Peak
Hour
Near-Term Year 2024
with Project
Near-Term Year 2024
without Project
Δ Delay
Avg. Delay
(sec.) LOS Avg. Delay(sec.) LOS
1 South Las Posas Road & Grand
Avenue Signal AM 31.8 C 31.7 C 0.1PM 40.6 D 39.8 D 0.8
2 SR-78 EB Ramps/Via Vera Cruz &
Grand Avenue Signal AM 66.0 E 65.3 E 0.7PM 89.3 F 89.2 F 0.1 3 Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive Signal AM 16.9 B 16.4 B 0.5 PM 21.3 C 19.9 B 1.4
4 Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue SSSC AM 11.1 B 10.1 B 1.0 PM 24.0 C 17.9 C 6.1
5 South Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue Signal AM 7.9 A 7.8 A 0.1 PM 11.3 B 11.3 B 0.0
6 Via Vera Cruz & West San Marcos
Boulevard Signal AM 21.2 C 19.3 B 1.9PM 52.5 D 51.2 D 1.3 7 Grand Avenue & West San Marcos
Boulevard Signal AM 34.6 C 34.2 C 0.4PM 49.1 D 47.2 D 2.9 8 Project Driveway #1 & Grand Avenue SSSC AM 10.2 B N/A N/A 10.2 PM 14.0 B N/A N/A 14.0
9 Project Driveway #2 & Grand Avenue SSSC AM 9.7 A N/A N/A 9.7 PM 12.4 B N/A N/A 12.4
10 Project Driveway #3 & Linda Vista
Drive SSSC AM 10.1 B N/A N/A 10.1PM 10.7 B N/A N/A 10.7 11 Project Driveway #4 & Linda Vista
Drive SSSC AM 10.4 B N/A N/A 10.4PM 11.7 B N/A N/A 11.7 Source: CR Associates (2022)
Notes:

Bold indicates LOS E or F.

SSSC = Side-Street Stop-Controlled. For SSSC intersections, the delay shown is the worst delay experienced by any of the approaches.

N/A = Not Applicable.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

7.0 Horizon Year 2050 Conditions
This section provides an analysis of Horizon Year 2050 traffic conditions both with and without the Project. The scenarios analyzed in this section include:
 Horizon Year 2050
 Horizon Year 2050 with Project
Horizon Year 2050 Roadway Network and Traffic
Volumes
Roadway segment functional classifications and intersection geometrics under Horizon Year 2050 Conditions were assumed to be identical to Existing conditions, as previously shown in Figure 5.1 and Figure 5.2.

Horizon Year 2050 ADT forecasts were obtained from the SANDAG Series 14 ABM2+/2021 RP forecast year 2050 model (scenario ID#459). Any study roadway segments with Near-Term Year 2024 Base ADT greater than forecasted TFIC ADT were adjusted using growth rates observed between existing and forecasted TFIC ADT for adjacent segments.

Intersection turning movement volumes were developed utilizing the projected study roadway segment volumes and the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 255 methodology. This methodology describes the use of growth factors by comparing existing and estimated/forecasted daily roadway segment volumes. These factors are then applied to existing peak hour intersection approach and departure volumes to derive future intersection turning movement traffic volumes. Manual adjustments were also made to ensure that traffic volumes among adjacent intersections were reasonably balanced. Details on counts collected from TFIC and forecasted intersection turning movement volume calculations are provided in Appendix K.

Figure 7.1A displays projected daily traffic volumes for study roadway segments and Figure 7.1B displays the AM/PM peak hour turning movements for study intersections under Horizon Year 2050 conditions.
39,500
4,400
9,200
12,200
12,600
12,000
23,000
39,500
6 1
2 7
5 4
3 San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 7.1A
Traffic Volumes
Horizon Year 2050 Conditions
Linda Vista Dr
S Bent Ave
Grand Ave
W San Marcos Bl
0 250 500 Feet
S Las Posas Rd
Via Vera Cruz
Armorlite Dr
78 #
XXX Daily Traffic Volumes
Legend
S Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue
S Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue SR-78 EB Ramps & Grand Avenue Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue Project Driveway #2 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #1 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #3
& Linda Vista Drive
Project Driveway #4
& Linda Vista Drive
Grand Avenue
& W San Marcos Boulevard
Via Vera Cruz
& W San Marcos Boulevard 5 / 55
40 / 65
50 / 65
15 / 7015 / 5015 / 45
50 / 60
45 / 75
25 / 50
45 / 60
30 / 55
30 / 60
30 / 65
30 / 85
35 / 35
40 / 80
35 / 7510 / 75
25 / 65
25 / 30
50 / 45
20 / 65
120 / 75 15 / 20 45 / 105 45 / 195 55 / 18060 / 110
60 / 210
70 / 250
75 / 125
90 / 310
95 / 180
95 / 17575 / 27575 / 27095 / 355
135 / 90
105 / 260
280 / 305
415 / 505
400 / 670
125 / 375
145 / 200
155 / 235
170 / 345
110 / 250
175 / 140
190 / 135
190 / 315
205 / 590
290 / 690
220 / 400
285 / 920
120 / 215
285 / 280250 / 310
210 / 375
305 / 270
310 / 870
355 / 495
125 / 325 470 / 280 665 / 560
415 / 345470 / 360120 / 260
870 / 1310
1280 / 1135
1075 / 1385
1425 / 1160
15 / 50
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 11
San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 7.1B
Traffic Volumes
Horizon Year 2050 Conditions
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first

AM / PM

NOT TO SCALE
X
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Horizon Year 2050 Traffic Conditions
LOS analyses under Horizon Year 2050 Conditions were conducted using the methodologies described in Chapter 2. Study roadway segment and intersection LOS analysis results are discussed below.

7.2.1 Roadway Segment Analysis
Table 7.1 displays roadway segment LOS analysis results for study roadway segments under Horizon Year 2050 conditions.

As shown, all study roadway segments are projected to operate at acceptable LOS D or better under Horizon Year 2050 conditions, with the exception of the following roadway segment:
 West San Marcos Boulevard, between Via Vera Cruz and South Bent Avenue – LOS E.

7.2.2 Intersection Analysis
Table 7.2 displays intersection LOS and average vehicle delay results for study area intersections under Horizon Year 2050 Conditions. LOS calculation worksheets for Horizon Year 2050 Conditions are provided in Appendix L.

As shown, all study intersections are projected to operate at acceptable LOS D or better under Horizon Year 2050 Conditions, with the exception of the following intersection:
 SR-78 EB Ramps/Via Vera Cruz & Grand Avenue – LOS E during the AM peak hour and LOS F during the PM peak hour.
 Grand Avenue & West San Marcos Boulevard – LOS E during the PM peak hour.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 7.1 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 Conditions Roadway Segment Functional Classification Roadway
Capacity
Daily
Volume V/C LOS
Via Vera Cruz Grand Avenue to Linda Vista Drive 4-Lane Secondary Arterial/Collector 30,000 12,600 0.420 B
Via Vera Cruz Linda Vista Drive to West San Marcos
Boulevard
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 9,200 0.307 A
Grand Avenue South Las Posas Road to Via Vera Cruz 4-Lane Secondary Arterial/Collector 30,000 23,000 0.767 D
Grand Avenue Via Vera Cruz to Linda Vista Drive 4-Lane Secondary Arterial/Collector 30,000 12,000 0.400 B
Grand Avenue Linda Vista Drive to West San Marcos
Boulevard
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 12,200 0.407 B
Linda Vista Drive Via Vera Cruz to Grand Avenue 2-Lane Collector (Commercial/Industrial Fronting) 8,000 4,400 0.550 C
West San Marcos
Boulevard Via Vera Cruz to South Bent Avenue 4-Lane Major Arterial 40,000 39,500 0.988 E West San Marcos
Boulevard South Bent Avenue to Grand Avenue 5-Lane Major Arterial 50,000 39,500 0.790 D San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 7.2 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 Conditions # Intersection Control Type Peak Hour Avg. Delay (sec.) LOS 1 South Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue Signal AM 32.2 C
PM 40.8 D
2 SR-78 EB Ramps/Via Vera Cruz & Grand Avenue Signal AM 65.7 E PM 90.4 F
3 Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive Signal AM 16.8 B
PM 20.9 C
4 Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue SSSC AM 11.2 B
PM 37.3 E
5 South Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue Signal AM 8.5 A
PM 13.3 B
6 Via Vera Cruz & West San Marcos Boulevard Signal AM 21.1 C PM 52.0 D
7 Grand Avenue & West San Marcos Boulevard Signal AM 36.6 D PM 58.3 E
Source: CR Associates (2022)
Notes:

Bold indicates LOS E or F.

SSSC = Side-Street Stop-Controlled. For SSSC intersections, the delay shown is the worst delay experienced by any of the approaches.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Horizon Year 2050 with Project Roadway Network and
Traffic Volumes
Roadway segment functional classifications and intersection geometrics under the Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions were assumed to be identical to the Horizon Year 2050 conditions, as previously discussed in Chapter 6.1.

Traffic volumes for the Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions were derived by combining the project trips (as previously shown in Figure 3.5A and Figure 3.5B) to the Horizon Year 2050 traffic volumes (as previously shown in Figure 7.1A and Figure 7.1B). Figure 7.2A displays projected daily traffic volumes for study roadway segments and Figure 7.2B displays projected AM/PM peak hour turning movements for study intersections under Horizon Year 2050 with Project conditions.

Horizon Year 2050 with Project Traffic Conditions
LOS analyses under Horizon Year 2050 with Project conditions were conducted using the methodologies described in Chapter 2. Study roadway segment and intersection LOS analysis results are discussed below.

7.4.1 Roadway Segment Analysis
Table 7.3 displays roadway segment LOS analysis results for study roadway segments under Horizon Year 2050 with Project conditions.

As shown, all study roadway segments are projected to operate at acceptable LOS D or better under Horizon Year 2050 with Project conditions, with the exception of the following roadway segment:
 West San Marcos Boulevard, between Via Vera Cruz and South Bent Avenue – The roadway segment is projected to operate at LOS E under Horizon Year 2050 with Project conditions.

The roadway segment is already operating at substandard LOS under Horizon Year 2050 conditions and the Project does not add any daily traffic along this segment.

This roadway segment is projected to operate at unacceptable LOS prior to the implementation of the Project. Project traffic would not increase the V/C ratio for this roadway segment by more than

0.02. Therefore, no study roadway segments are anticipated to degrade in LOS to unacceptable levels with implementation of the Project and no improvements will be required. 39,500
5,543
9,773
12,773
12,458
12,829
23,688
5,205
5,088
12,458
39,500
12,458
8 9
6 1
2 7
5 4
3 11
10 San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 7.2A
Traffic Volumes
Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions
Linda Vista Dr
S Bent Ave
Grand Ave
W San Marcos Bl
0 250 500 Feet
S Las Posas Rd
Via Vera Cruz
Armorlite Dr
Project
Dwy #2
Project Project Dwy #4 Dwy #3
Project
Dwy #1
78 #
XXX Daily Traffic Volumes
Legend
S Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue
S Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue SR-78 EB Ramps & Grand Avenue Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue Project Driveway #2 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #1 & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway #3
& Linda Vista Drive
Project Driveway #4
& Linda Vista Drive
Grand Avenue
& W San Marcos Boulevard
Via Vera Cruz
& W San Marcos Boulevard
7 / 9
3 / 9
0 / 0
3 / 4
1 / 5
6 / 20
8 / 225 / 10
9 / 134 / 12
7 / 10
6 / 17
11 / 427 / 8
4 / 11
64 / 7730 / 60
57 / 95
14 / 21
15 / 70
73 / 84
45 / 60
25 / 50
40 / 80
25 / 85
27 / 70
40 / 65
35 / 35
30 / 6530 / 75
32 / 57
32 / 42
35 / 7510 / 75
40 / 35
29 / 41
25 / 65
22 / 60
13 / 64
11 / 15
20 / 65
120 / 75
75 / 125
45 / 195
95 / 180
90 / 310
48 / 110
56 / 183
60 / 110
73 / 255
63 / 223
98 / 17975 / 27578 / 27495 / 355
105 / 260
119 / 265
261 / 224
430 / 515
425 / 718
132 / 394
348 / 767
151 / 208
153 / 447
155 / 235
157 / 450
182 / 149 180 / 359
194 / 332
202 / 152
303 / 698
219 / 607
225 / 413
240 / 458
245 / 473
295 / 330 285 / 930
264 / 221
122 / 220
286 / 281250 / 310
216 / 385
317 / 290
327 / 892
145 / 102
355 / 495
372 / 771
130 / 330 470 / 285 665 / 555
444 / 375480 / 385123 / 263
870 / 1310
1280 / 1135
1075 / 1385
1425 / 1160
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 11
San Marcos Artist's Village
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 7.2B
Traffic Volumes
Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first

AM / PM

NOT TO SCALE
X
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 7.3 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions Roadway Segment Functional
Classification
Roadway
Capacity
Horizon Year 2050
with Project
Horizon Year 2050
without Project Δ V/C
Daily Volume V/C LOS Daily Volume V/C LOS
Via Vera
Cruz
Grand Avenue to Linda
Vista Drive
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 12,866 0.429 B 12,600 0.420 B 0.009 Via Vera
Cruz
Linda Vista Drive to West
San Marcos Boulevard
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 9,760 0.325 A 9,200 0.307 A 0.019 Grand
Avenue
South Las Posas Road to
Via Vera Cruz
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 23,560 0.785 D 23,000 0.767 D 0.019 Grand
Avenue
Via Vera Cruz to Project
Driveway #1
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 12,406 0.414 B 12,000 0.400 B 0.014 Grand
Avenue
Project Driveway #1 to
Project Driveway #2
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 12,631 0.421 B 12,000 0.400 B 0.021 Grand
Avenue
Project Driveway #2 to
Linda Vista Drive
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 12,801 0.427 B 12,000 0.400 B 0.027 Grand
Avenue
Linda Vista Drive to West
San Marcos Boulevard
4-Lane Secondary
Arterial/Collector 30,000 12,873 0.429 B 12,200 0.407 B 0.022 Linda
Vista
Drive
Via Vera Cruz to Project
Driveway #3
2-Lane Collector
(Commercial/Industrial
Fronting)
8,000 5,562 0.695 D 4,400 0.550 C 0.145
Linda
Vista
Drive
Project Driveway #3 to
Project Driveway #4
2-Lane Collector
(Commercial/Industrial
Fronting)
8,000 5,296 0.662 D 4,400 0.550 C 0.112
Linda
Vista
Drive
Project Driveway #4 to
Grand Avenue
2-Lane Collector
(Commercial/Industrial
Fronting)
8,000 5,296 0.662 D 4,400 0.550 C 0.112
West San
Marcos
Boulevard
Via Vera Cruz to South
Bent Avenue 4-Lane Major Arterial 40,000 39,500 0.988 E 39,500 0.988 E 0.000 West San
Marcos
Boulevard
South Bent Avenue to
Grand Avenue 5-Lane Major Arterial 50,000 39,500 0.790 D 39,500 0.790 D 0.000 Source: CR Associates (2022)
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

7.4.2 Intersection Analysis
Table 7.4 displays intersection LOS and average vehicle delay results for the key study area intersections under Horizon Year 2050 with Project conditions. LOS calculation worksheets for Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions are provided in Appendix M.

As shown, all study intersections are projected to operate at acceptable LOS D or better under Horizon Year 2050 with Project conditions, with the exception of the following intersection:
 SR-78 EB Ramps/Via Vera Cruz & Grand Avenue – LOS E during the AM peak hour and LOS F during the PM peak hour. The intersection is already operating at substandard LOS under Horizon Year 2050 without Project conditions and the Project adds 1.1 seconds of delay during the AM peak hour and 0.8 seconds of delay during the PM peak hour.  Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue – LOS F during the PM peak hour. The Project adds 32.9 seconds of delay and causes the LOS at this intersection to degrade from LOS E to LOS F during the PM peak hour.
 Grand Avenue & West San Marcos Boulevard – LOS E during the PM peak hour. The Project adds 1.1 seconds of delay to this intersection already operating at substandard LOS E under Horizon Year 2050 without Project conditions.

Implementation of the Project would cause an inconsistency with Policy M-1.4 at the intersection of Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue since it would increase the delay at an intersection already operating at LOS E or F by more than 2.0 seconds. In contrast, the intersections of SR-78 EB Ramps/Via Vera Cruz & Grand Avenue and Grand Avenue & West San Marcos Boulevard, which operate at LOS E or F during the PM peak hour, would experience an increase in delay less than 2.0 seconds and thus would not result in substantial effects to traffic operations.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 7.4 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions # Intersection Control
Type
Peak
Hour
Horizon Year
2050
with Project
Horizon Year
2050
without Project
Δ Delay
Avg.

Delay
(sec.)
LOS
Avg.

Delay
(sec.)
LOS
1 South Las Posas Road &
Grand Avenue Signal AM 32.1 C 32.1 C 0.0
PM 41.1 D 40.9 D 0.2
2 SR-78 EB Ramps/Via Vera
Cruz & Grand Avenue Signal AM 71.9 E 70.8 E 1.1
PM 101.8 F 101.0 F 0.8
3 Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista
Drive Signal AM 17.1 B 16.6 B 0.5
PM 22.4 C 20.9 C 1.5
4 Linda Vista Drive & Grand
Avenue SSSC AM 12.3 B 11.2 B 1.1
PM 70.2 F 37.3 E 32.9
5 South Bent Avenue &
Grand Avenue Signal AM 8.5 A 8.5 A 0.0
PM 13.6 B 13.3 B 0.3
6 Via Vera Cruz & West San
Marcos Boulevard Signal AM 22.8 C 21.1 C 1.7
PM 52.3 D 52.1 D 0.2
7 Grand Avenue & West San
Marcos Boulevard Signal AM 36.8 D 36.6 D 0.2
PM 59.4 E 58.3 E 1.1
8 Project Driveway #1 &
Grand Avenue SSSC AM 10.2 B N/A N/A 10.2
PM 13.1 B N/A N/A 13.1
9 Project Driveway #2 &
Grand Avenue SSSC AM 9.9 A N/A N/A 9.9
PM 13.0 B N/A N/A 13.0
10 Project Driveway #3 &
Linda Vista Drive SSSC AM 10.6 B N/A N/A 10.6
PM 11.6 B N/A N/A 11.6
11 Project Driveway #4 &
Linda Vista Drive SSSC AM 10.9 B N/A N/A 10.9
PM 12.9 B N/A N/A 12.0
Source: CR Associates (2022)
Notes:

Bold indicates LOS E or F.

SSSC = Side-Street Stop-Controlled. For SSSC intersections, the delay shown is the worst delay experienced by any of the approaches.

N/A = Not Applicable.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

8.0 LOS Deficiencies and Improvement
Requirements
This chapter provides improvements requirements needed to increase LOS to acceptable or preproject conditions for any roadway segments or intersections found to operate unacceptably with implementation of the Project.

Determination of the Need for Off-Site Improvements to
Accommodate Project Traffic – Near-Term Year 2024
with Project Conditions
This section identifies required improvements for any study roadway segments or intersections that are associated with the Project under Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project conditions.

Roadway Segment Analysis
No improvements required.

Intersection Analysis
No improvements required.

Determination of the Need for Off-Site Improvements to
Accommodate Project Traffic – Horizon Year 2050 with
Project Conditions
This section identifies required improvements for any study roadway segments or intersections that are associated with the Project under Horizon Year 2050 with Project conditions.

Roadway Segment Analysis
No improvements required.

Intersection Analysis
Because implementation of the Project would further deteriorate traffic operations and increase the delay at an intersection already operating at LOS E or F by more than 2.0 seconds, the Project would cause an inconsistency with Policy M-1.4 at the following intersection:
 Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue – To improve operations at this intersection, the Project shall provide a fair share contribution to install a traffic signal. It should be noted the intersection already operates at substandard LOS E without the Project, indicating the Project does not directly cause the inconsistency. Upon implementation of this improvement, the intersection would operate at acceptable LOS and better than pre-project conditions.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

The total number of vehicle trips passing through this intersection during the PM peak hour is 1,811, of which 101 (or 5.6% of the total volume) are vehicle trips generated by the Project. Thus, the Project would be responsible for 5.6% of the cost to implement this improvement.

Table 8.1 displays intersection LOS and average vehicle delay results under Horizon Year 2050 with Project with Mitigation conditions. LOS calculation worksheets and signal timing inputs are provided in Appendix N.

Table 8.1 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 with Project with Mitigation Conditions # Intersection Peak
Hour
Control
Type
Horizon Year 2050 with
Project and Mitigation Control
Type
Horizon Year 2050
without Project and
Mitigation Δ
Delay
Avg. Delay (sec.) LO
S
Avg. Delay
(sec.) LOS
4 Linda Vista
Drive &
Grand
Avenue
AM
Signal

5.8 A
SSSC

11.2 B -5.6
PM 12.8 B 37.3 E -24.5
Source: CR Associates (2022)
As shown, the recommended improvement would decrease the delay by 5.6 seconds during the AM peak hour and 24.5 seconds during the PM peak hour. Thus, the intersection would operate at acceptable LOS and better than pre-project conditions.

Traffic Signal Warrant
A traffic signal warrant analysis was conducted to determine if a signal would be warranted at the intersection of Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue. The ADT-based signal warrant (Figure 4C-103) of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control devices (CA MUTCD) was selected for this analysis.

Based on the projected Horizon Year 2050 traffic volumes, the intersection of Linda Vista Drive & Grand Avenue would meet the requirements to satisfy the traffic signal warrant. The traffic signal warrant is provided in Appendix O.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

9.0 Site Access and Circulation
This chapter addresses access to the project site and discusses the functionality of the project’s internal circulation.

Driveway Access
Project site access will be provided via the following four new project driveways:
 Project Driveway #1 – This new, full-access driveway will be located along the south side of Grand Avenue approximately 900 feet northwest of Linda Vista Drive. This driveway will be a new side-street stop-controlled intersection with Grand Avenue as the uncontrolled approach and the project driveway as the stop-controlled approach. This driveway will serve as the main entry point for residents and is projected to operate at LOS B or better under all study scenarios.
 Project Driveway #2 – This new, full-access driveway will be located along the south side of Grand Avenue approximately 300 feet northwest of Linda Vista Drive. This driveway will be a new side-street stop-controlled intersection with Grand Avenue as the uncontrolled approach and the project driveway as the stop-controlled approach. This driveway will serve as one of three entry points for the retail and office components of the Project and is projected to operate at LOS B or better under all study scenarios.
 Project Driveway #3 – This new, full-access driveway will be located along the north side of Linda Vista Drive approximately 700 feet southwest of Grand Avenue. This driveway will be a new side-street stop-controlled intersection with Linda Vista Drive as the uncontrolled approach and the project driveway as the stop-controlled approach. This driveway will serve as one of three entry points for the retail and office components of the Project and is projected to operate at LOS B or better under all study scenarios.  Project Driveway #4 – This new, full-access driveway will be located along the north side of Linda Vista Drive approximately 250 feet southwest of Grand Avenue. This driveway will be a new side-street stop-controlled intersection with Linda Vista Drive as the uncontrolled approach and the project driveway as the stop-controlled approach. This driveway will serve as one of three entry points for the retail and office components of the Project and is projected to operate at LOS B or better under all study scenarios.

A 95th percentile queue analysis was conducted to determine the extent of queueing at the project driveway intersections under Near-Term Year 2024 Base with Project conditions and Horizon Year 2050 with Project conditions. The queue analysis was conducted for the proposed project driveways and the offsite turning movements along Grand Avenue and Linda Vista Drive. Table 9.1 displays the 95th percentile queue analysis results for project driveway intersections under both analysis scenarios. Intersection queueing reports are provided in Appendix P. A sight distance exhibit displaying line-of-sight at each of the proposed driveways is included in Appendix Q.

As shown, the 95th percentile queues at project driveway intersections are projected to fit within the available storage and would not impede circulation of traffic at the driveways or adjacent roadway system.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 9.1 - Project Driveway Queue Analysis Results
# Intersection Control
Type
Turning
Movement
Peak
Hour
Available
Storage1 (ft)
Near-Term Year 2024
with Project Conditions
Horizon Year 2050
with Project Conditions
95th Percentile
Queue (ft)
Excess
Queue (ft)
95th Percentile
Queue (ft)
Excess
Queue (ft)
8 Project Driveway #1 &
Grand Avenue SSSC
EBR AM 1,250 0 0 0 0
PM 0 0 0 0
WBL AM 900 0 0 0 0
PM 25 0 25 0
9 Project Driveway #2 &
Grand Avenue SSSC
EBR AM 1,850 0 0 0 0
PM 0 0 0 0
WBL AM 300 25 0 25 0
PM 25 0 25 0
10 Project Driveway #3 &
Linda Vista Drive SSSC
EBL AM 1,050 25 0 25 0
PM 25 0 25 0
WBR AM 450 0 0 0 0
PM 0 0 0 0
11 Project Driveway #4 &
Linda Vista Drive SSSC
EBL AM 450 25 0 25 0
PM 25 0 25 0
WBR AM 250 0 0 0 0
PM 0 0 0 0
Source: CR Associates (2022)
Notes:
1 Measured from project driveway to upstream intersection.

SSSC = Side-Street Stop-Controlled.

EBR = Eastbound Right, EBL = Eastbound Left
WBR = Westbound Right, WBL = Westbound Left
San Marcos Artist’s Village Project
Local Transportation Analysis

After further review of the project site plan, the following recommendations are provided:
 Driveways are recommended to be constructed in accordance with City standards  Install stop signs (R1-1) at project driveways
Internal Circulation
Internal roadways on the project site allow for two-way flow of vehicle traffic. For the residential component, dead-end aisles between buildings provide direct access to garages for each dwelling unit. Guest parking is also provided at the project site.

Based upon review of the project site plan, the following recommendations are provided:
 Appropriate signage to warn drivers of pedestrian foot traffic.

Appendix A - Grand Avenue Offsite
Improvement Plans
PARCEL F1 APN 219-152-70-00 PARCEL F2 DOC 2019-0160631 APN 219-152-70-00 MARCOS PROJECT GRAND AVENUE OFFSITE IMPROVEMENT PLANJOB NO. DRAWN BY: SHEET 1 of 2 E N G I N E E R I N G 6390 Greenwich Dr., Suite 170 San Diego, California 92122 tel 858.554.1500 fax 858.597.0335 www.fuscoe.com PARCEL D OF COC REC DOC NO. 2019-0545336 APN 219-152-78-00 PARCEL 4 DOC 2019-0254641 APN 219-152-51-00 PARCEL 1 DOC 2019-0254641 APN 219-152-42-00 PARCEL 3 DOC 2019-0254641 APN 219-152-45-00 PARCEL 2 DOC 2019-0254641 APN 219-152-44-00 MARCOS PROJECTJOB NO. DRAWN BY: SHEET E N G I N E E R I N G 6390 Greenwich Dr., Suite 170 San Diego, California 92122 tel 858.554.1500 fax 858.597.0335 www.fuscoe.com KEY MAP MARCOS PROJECT LINDA VISTA DR. OFFSITE IMPROVEMENT PLANJOB NO. DRAWN BY: SHEET2 of 2 E N G I N E E R I N G 6390 Greenwich Dr., Suite 170 San Diego, California 92122 tel 858.554.1500 fax 858.597.0335 www.fuscoe.com PARCEL A OF COC REC DOC NO. 2019-0160631 APN 219-152-75-00 PARCEL 5 DOC 2019-0254641 APN 219-152-61-00 PARCEL D OF COC REC DOC NO. 2019-0545336 APN 219-152-78-00 PARCEL 5 DOC 2019-0254641 APN 219-152-61-00 PARCEL 1 DOC 2019-0254641 APN 219-152-42-00 PARCEL 3 DOC 2019-0254641 APN 219-152-45-00 PARCEL 2 DOC 2019-0254641 APN 219-152-44-00 KEY MAP Appendix B - Scoping Memorandum
3900 5th Avenue, Suite 310  San Diego, CA 92103  619-795-6086 www.CRAmobility.com

TO: Jonathan Quezada, Assistant Engineer; City of San Marcos Chris Garcia, Associate Planner; City of San Marcos
FROM: Jonathan Sanchez, PE, TE, PTOE; CR Associates
DATE: June 10, 2022
RE: San Marcos Artist’s Village Project – Memorandum of Approach (MOA)

This memorandum serves to document the assumptions that will be used to conduct both a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) and a Local Transportation Analysis (LTA), for the San Marcos Artist’s Village project (the “Proposed Project”). The vehicle miles traveled (VMT) analysis for the TIS and level of service (LOS) analysis for the LTA will be performed in accordance with the City of San Marcos Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, November 2020 (TIA Guidelines).

Project Description
The Proposed Project proposes to construct 102 multi-family dwelling units, 15,086 square feet of office, and 49,266 square feet (s.f.) of specialty retail at the northwest corner of Linda Vista Road and Grand Avenue, in the City of San Marcos. The Project will provide the following four new sidestreet stopped controlled driveways:
 Project Driveway #1 – This new driveway will be located approximately 900 feet northwest of Linda Vista Drive
 Project Driveway #2 – This driveway will be located approximately 300 feet northwest of Linda Vista Drive
 Project Driveway #3 – This driveway will be located approximately 700 feet southwest of Grand Avenue
 Project Driveway #4 – This driveway will be located approximately 250 feet southwest of Grand Avenue

Figure 1 displays the Project’s regional location. Figure 2 displays the Project’s current site plan.

VMT Analysis
According to the City of San Marcos TIA Guidelines, a VMT analysis is required if the following criteria for screening projects are not met: (1) small project screening, (2) affordable housing screening, (3) local-serving retail or public facility screening, (3) High Quality Transit Area (HQTA) screening, (4) low VMT area screening.

Since the Proposed Project is composed of a mix of land uses, each component must be evaluated independently and apply the significant threshold for each land use type, incorporating internalization reductions. Therefore, the VMT analysis for the project would be as follows:
 Residential Component – Per Section 2.1.2.5, the Proposed Project is located in an efficient VMT/Capita area. Therefore, the residential component is deemed to have a less-thansignificant impact and no further VMT analysis is required.  Office Component – Per Section 2.1.2.5, the Proposed Project is NOT located in an efficient VMT/Employee area. Therefore, a detailed VMT analysis is required. ·|}þ78
City of Vista
City of
Carlsbad
City of
Encinitas
City of
Escondido
City of
Escondido
County of
San Diego
County of
San Diego
County of
San Diego
County of
San Diego
County of
San Diego
City of
San Diego
City of
San Marcos
N
Figure 1
Project Regional Location
San Marcos Artist’s Village
Memorandum of Approach
0 1 2 Miles
Project Site
^
Figure 2
Project Site Plan
San Marcos Artist’s Village
Memorandum of Approach
N

ARTISTS VILLAGE

CIVIL SITE PLAN
JOB NO.

DRAWN BY:

E N G I N E E R I N G
6390 Greenwich Dr Suite 170
Site Plan
San Marcos Artist’s Village Page 4
Memorandum of Approach
 Retail Component – Per Section 2.1.2.3, the Proposed Project is less than 50,000 square feet and considered “local-serving retail”. Therefore, the retail component is deemed to have a less-than-significant impact and no further VMT analysis is required.

As described above, the VMT/Employee associated with the office component of the project does not meet any of the screening criteria and it requires a detailed VMT analysis to be conducted. The VMT analysis will be calculated using the SANDAG Online VMT Tool, as the office component of the project would generate less than 2,400 daily trips. The TIA will include discussions of VMT results, identify impacts, and make recommendations, as needed.

Local Transportation Analysis
The purpose of the LTA is to evaluate how the Project will affect the surrounding local transportation network, as well as to determine if additional transportation improvements will be needed. The LTA analysis will evaluate the following five (5) scenarios:

1. Existing Conditions (2022) - This scenario is utilized to establish the existing baseline of traffic operations within the study area.

2. Near-Term 2024 Base Conditions – This scenario establishes a near-term baseline against which traffic generated by the Proposed Project can be compared to at the project opening day, anticipated to be Year 2024. Ambient growth rates or addition of cumulative projects’ traffic will be used to develop the Opening Year 2024 Base Conditions.

3. Near-Term 2024 Base with Project Conditions – This scenario represents the Opening Year traffic conditions with the addition of traffic generated by the Proposed Project.

4. Horizon Year 2050 Base Conditions – This scenario represents projected long-range baseline traffic conditions for Year 2050.

5. Horizon Year 2050 Base with Project Conditions – This scenario represents Year 2050 base traffic conditions with the addition of traffic generated by the Proposed Project.

Trip Generation
Project trip generation estimates were derived utilizing SANDAG’s (not so) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (SANDAG, April 2002). Table 1 displays daily, as well as AM and PM peak hour project trip generation.

As shown in the table, the Project is anticipated to generate a total net of 2,292 daily trips, including 117 (61-in / 54-out) trips during the AM peak hour and 218 trips (110-in / 108-out) during the PM peak hour.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Page 5
Memorandum of Approach
Table 1 Project Trip Generation
Land Use Units Trip Rate ADT AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
% Trips Split In Out % Trips Split In Out
Residential
Multi-family 102 DU 6 / DU 612 8% 49 2:8 10 39 9% 56 7:3 39 17 Subtotal 612 49 - 10 39 56 39 17
Employment/Office
Single Tenant Office 15,086 SF 14 / KSF 212 15% 34 9:1 29 3 15% 32 2:8 6 26 Subtotal 824 83 - 39 42 - 88 - 45 43
Commercial/Retail
Specialty Retail
Center / Strip
Commercial
49,266 SF 40 / KSF 1,971 3% 60 6:4 36 24 9% 178 5:5 89 89 Subtotal 2,795 143 75 66 266 134 132
Gross Total 2,795 - 143 75 66 266 134 132
Internal Capture (18%)1 -503 - -26 - -14 -12 -48 - -24 -24 Net Total Project Trips 2,292 117 61 54 218 110 108
Source: SANDAG (not so) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002 Notes:

DU = Dwelling Unit.

KSF = Thousand Square Feet. 1Internal Capture reduction was calculated using ITE’s trip reduction calculator, which is based on the NCHRP Report 664 Enhancing Internal Trip Capture Estimation for Mixed-Use Developments. See Attachment A for more details.

San Marcos Artist’s Village Page 6
Memorandum of Approach
Project Trip Distribution
The trip distribution for the Project was developed based on the geographical location of the Project, as well as the characteristics of the surrounding land uses. The Project’s trip distribution patterns are identified in Figure 3.

Project Trip Assignment
Based upon the Project’s trip generation (Table 1) and distribution (Figure 3), daily project trips and AM/PM peak hour were assigned to the adjacent roadway network. Figures 4 & 5 display daily trip assignment for the residential and retail components, respectively, while Figure 6 displays the AM/PM peak hour trip assignment.

Project Study Area
The following roadway segments and intersections will be included in the project study area:

Roadway Segments
 Via Vera Cruz, between Grand Avenue and Linda Vista Drive  Via Vera Cruz, between Linda Vista Drive and West San Marcos Blvd  Grand Avenue, between Las Posas Road and Via Vera Cruz  Grand Avenue, between Via Vera Cruz and Linda Vista Drive  Grand Avenue, between Linda Vista Drive and West San Marcos Blvd  Linda Vista Drive, between Via Vera Cruz and Grand Avenue  West San Marcos Blvd, between Via Vera Cruz and San Marcos Blvd Intersections

1. Las Posas Road & Grand Avenue

2. Via Vera Cruz & Grand Avenue

3. Via Vera Cruz & Linda Vista Drive

4. Grand Avenue & Linda Vista Drive

5. South Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue

6. Via Vera Cruz & West San Marcos Blvd

7. Grand Avenue & West San Marcos Blvd

8. Project Driveway #1 & Grand Avenue

9. Project Driveway #2 & Grand Avenue

10. Project Driveway #3 & Linda Vista Drive

11. Project Driveway #4 & Linda Vista Drive

The LTA will include a section regarding operational characteristics of the project driveways. Figure 7 displays the project study area.

Traffic Volume Development
Traffic counts will be conducted along the study roadway segments and intersections listed above.

To ensure that current travel patterns reflect traffic conditions prior to the COVID-19 restrictions, a count validation will be conducted. Historical counts will be compared against the new traffic counts.

If current travel patterns are observed to be similar (less than 5% variations) to pre-COVID-19 conditions, the new traffic counts will be deemed appropriate to utilize for this TIA. Otherwise, these counts will be adjusted to account for reduced traffic conditions. 20%
15%
50%
5%
35%
25%
10%
30%
30%
20%
10%
15%
25%
10%
20%
20%
5%
20%
5%
5%
20%
10%
10%
10%
8 9
6 1
2 7
5 4
3 11
10 SanMarcosArtist’sVillage
MemorandumofApproach
Figure 3
Trip Distribution
Project
Site
Linda Vista Dr
Bent Ave
Grand Ave
San Marcos Bl
0 500 1,000 Feet
Trip Distribution
Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
#
Las Posas Rd
Via Vera Cruz
Discovery St
Armorlite Dr
XX%
Project
Dwy #2
Project
Dwy #4 Project
Dwy #3
Project
Dwy #1
78 25
25 25
25 504
403
403 151
50 101
76 252
252
51 101
50 76
252
50 125
101
126
151
101
50 101
101
51 8
9 6
1 2
7 5
4 3
11 10
SanMarcosArtist’sVillage
MemorandumofApproach
Figure 4
Trip Assignment (Residents)
Project
Site
Linda Vista Dr
Bent Ave
Grand Ave
San Marcos Bl
0 500 1,000 Feet
Trip Assignment
Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
#
Las Posas Rd
Via Vera Cruz
Discovery St
Armorlite Dr
XX
Project
Dwy #2
Project
Dwy #4 Project
Dwy #3
Project
Dwy #1
78 90
90 90
90 597
358
716 538
596 597
179
358
269
895
895
179
358
358
269
895
179
448
358
448
537
358
179
358
358
179
8 9
6 1
2 7
5 4
3 11
10 SanMarcosArtist’sVillage
MemorandumofApproach
Figure 5
Trip Assignment (Retail)
Project
Site
Linda Vista Dr
Bent Ave
Grand Ave
San Marcos Bl
0 500 1,000 Feet
Trip Assignment
Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
#
Las Posas Rd
Via Vera Cruz
Discovery St
Armorlite Dr
XX
Project
Dwy #2
Project
Dwy #4 Project
Dwy #3
Project
Dwy #1
78 Legend
SR-78EB Ramps & Grand Avenue Via VeraCruz & Linda Vista Drive Grand Avenue & Linda Vista Drive South Bent Avenue & Grand Avenue
Grand Avenue & Project Driveway#2
Via VeraCruz & San Marcos Boulevard Grand Avenue & Project Driveway#1 South LasPosas Road & Grand Avenue
Project Driveway#3
& Linda Vista Drive
Project Driveway#4
& Linda Vista Drive
Grand Avenue
&WestSan Marcos Boulevard
3/6
6/3
2/63/4
3/54/6
1/6
5/13
3/164/16
4/17
9/13
8/18
6/10
6/11
6/26
7/24
5/12
4/21
9/17
9/41
32/22
10/23
10/24
11/20
12/15
12/20
10/21
17/28
16/44
26/11
24/39
22/41
15/43
16/27 13/22
14/26
14/24
14/20
26/34
29/36
13/12 9/17
9/13
6/11
9/13
5/12
3/5
6/10
9/13
3/5
4/16
6/10
3/5
3/16
5/12
9/17
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 11
SanMarcosArtist’sVillage
MemorandumofApproach
Figure 6
Project Trip Assignment - Intersection
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first
AM /PM

NOTTO SCALE
X
8 9
6 1
2 7
5 4
3 11
10 SanMarcosArtist’sVillage
MemorandumofApproach
Figure 7
Project Study Area
Bent Ave
Grand Ave
San Marcos Bl
0 500 1,000 Feet
Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
#
Las Posas Rd
Via Vera Cruz
Discovery St
Armorlite Dr
Project
Site
Linda Vista Dr
Project
Dwy #2
Project
Dwy #4 Project
Dwy #3
Project
Dwy #1
78 San Marcos Artist’s Village Page 12
Memorandum of Approach
Proposed Table of Contents

VMT Analysis
Executive Summary

1. Introduction

2. Project Setting

3. Analysis Methodology

4. Analysis Metrics

5. Screening Evaluation

6. VMT Analysis

7. Significant Impacts & Mitigation Measures

LTA
Executive Summary

1. Introduction

2. Project Setting
a. Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Facilities (discussion of potential impacts to multi-modal transportation)

3. Analysis Methodology

4. LTA - Existing Conditions

5. LTA - Near-Term 2024 Base Conditions

6. LTA - Near-Term 2024 Base with Project Conditions

7. LTA - Horizon Year 2050 Base Conditions

8. LTA - Horizon Year 2050 Base with Project Conditions

9. Deficiencies & Mitigation Measures

10. Site Access & On-Site Circulation
a. Driveway Sight Distance
b. Parking
c. Vehicle Queueing

San Marcos Artist’s Village Attachments
Memorandum of Approach
Attachment A - Internal Trip Capture Estimation
for Mixed-Use Developments
Project Name:

Analysis Period:

Veh. Occ. Vehicle-Trips Person-Trips* Veh. Occ. Vehicle-Trips Person-Trips* Office 1.00 29 29 1.00 3 3
Retail 1.00 36 36 1.00 24 24
Restaurant 1.00 0 0 1.00 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment 1.00 0 0 1.00 0 0
Residential 1.00 10 10 1.00 39 39
Hotel 1.00 0 0 1.00 0 0
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office 1 2 0 0
Retail 7 3 3 0
Restaurant 0 0 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 1 0 8 0
Hotel 0 0 0 0
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office 12 0 0 0
Retail 1 0 0 0
Restaurant 4 3 1 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 1 6 0 0
Hotel 1 1 0 0
Internal External Total Vehicles1 Transit2 Non-Motorized2 Office 2 27 29 27 0 0
Retail 1 35 36 35 0 0
Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 0 10 10 10 0 0
Hotel 0 0 0 0 0 0
All Other Land Uses3 00 0 0 0 0
Internal External Total Vehicles1 Transit2 Non-Motorized2 Office 1 2 3 2 0 0
Retail 1 23 24 23 0 0
Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 1 38 39 38 0 0
Hotel 0 0 0 0 0 0
All Other Land Uses3 00 0 0 0 0
Land Use Table 7-A (D): Entering Trips
2 Person-Trips
Person-Trip Estimates
San Marcos Artist's Village
AM Street Peak Hour
Table 9-A (D): Internal and External Trips Summary (Entering Trips) Table 8-A (O): Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix (Computed at Origin) Origin (From) Destination (To)
Cinema/Entertainment
Table 7-A: Conversion of Vehicle-Trip Ends to Person-Trip Ends Table 7-A (O): Exiting Trips
0 0
0 Table 8-A (D): Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix (Computed at Destination) Origin (From)
Origin Land Use Person-Trip Estimates External Trips by Mode* External Trips by Mode*
1 Vehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-A 0 *Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number. 0 0
0 0
0 Destination (To)
Cinema/Entertainment
0 3
Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site-not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator Destination Land Use
Table 9-A (O): Internal and External Trips Summary (Exiting Trips) Project Name:

Analysis Period:

Veh. Occ. Vehicle-Trips Person-Trips* Veh. Occ. Vehicle-Trips Person-Trips* Office 1.00 6 6 1.00 26 26
Retail 1.00 89 89 1.00 89 89
Restaurant 1.00 0 0 1.00 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment 1.00 0 0 1.00 0 0
Residential 1.00 39 39 1.00 17 17
Hotel 1.00 0 0 1.00 0 0
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office 5 1 1 0
Retail 2 26 23 4
Restaurant 0 0 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 1 7 4 1
Hotel 0 0 0 0
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office 7 0 2 0
Retail 2 0 18 0
Restaurant 2 45 6 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0 4 0 2 0
Residential 3 9 0 0
Hotel 0 2 0 0
Internal External Total Vehicles1 Transit2 Non-Motorized2 Office 3 3 6 3 0 0
Retail 12 77 89 77 0 0
Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 19 20 39 20 0 0
Hotel 0 0 0 0 0 0
All Other Land Uses3 000 0 0 0
Internal External Total Vehicles1 Transit2 Non-Motorized2 Office 6 20 26 20 0 0
Retail 20 69 89 69 0 0
Restaurant 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 8 9 17 9 0 0
Hotel 0 0 0 0 0 0
All Other Land Uses3 000 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 3
Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site-not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator Table 9-P (O): Internal and External Trips Summary (Exiting Trips) Origin Land Use Person-Trip Estimates External Trips by Mode* Person-Trip Estimates External Trips by Mode*
0 Table 8-P (D): Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix (Computed at Destination) Origin (From)
2 Person-Trips
0 0
Table 9-P (D): Internal and External Trips Summary (Entering Trips) Destination Land Use
*Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number.

San Marcos Artist's Village
PM Street Peak Hour
Table 7-P: Conversion of Vehicle-Trip Ends to Person-Trip Ends Land Use Table 7-P (D): Entering Trips Table 7-P (O): Exiting Trips Table 8-P (O): Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix (Computed at Origin) Origin (From) Destination (To)
Destination (To)
Cinema/Entertainment
Cinema/Entertainment
0 4
1 Vehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P

INTERNAL CAPTURE CALCULATION
Land Use Rate Type Units Type Trip Rate Per ADT % Trips In Out % Trips In Out RESIDENTIAL ‐ Multi‐Family (Over 20 DU/acre) Driveway 102 DU 6 Unit 612 8% 49 2 : 8 10 39 9% 56 7 : 3 39 17 OFFICE ‐ Corporate Headquarters/Single Tenant Office Driveway 15,086 KSF 14 KSF 212 15% 32 9 : 1 29 3 15% 32 2 : 8 6 26 COMMERCIAL‐RETAIL ‐ Specialty Retail Center/Strip Commercial Driveway 49,266 KSF 40 KSF 1971 3% 60 6 : 4 36 24 9% 178 5 : 5 89 89 GROSS TOTAL 2795 141 75 66 266 134 132
Mixed Use Internalization 18% ‐503 ‐25 ‐14 ‐11 ‐48 ‐24 ‐24 NET TOTAL 2292 116 61 55 218 110 108
Total In Out Total In Out
135 72 63 198 100 98
Internal Capture 4% 26%
Total In Out
333 172 161
18%
AM & PM Combined Internal Capture
AM PM
Split Split
AM Reduced Trips PM Reduced Trips
Appendix C - Signal Timings

Phase Timing and Options
Unit Information Phase Timing Phase Options
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

X X X X X X X X
. . . X . . . X
. X . . . X . .

X X X X X X X X
. X . . . X . .
. . . . . . . .

Unit Parameters . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . X . . . X
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. X . X . X . .

Phase Configuration Global Phase Recalls Notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .

City of San Marcos
Las Posas @ Grand
Phase
Enable
Non Lock Detector
Min Vehicle Recall
Max Vehicle Recall
Ped Recall
0 0
8 0 5 0 5 0 0
0 27 0 23 0
1 2 4
6 4
2 Phase
1 7
8 EB Left
Phase
Min
Max
Ped
Green No Walk
Phase Not On
Phase Not On WB
Green No Walk
SB
Phase Not On
Description
SB Left
Startup
Phase Not On
Phase Not On
Added Initial
Maximum Initial
Time B4 Reduction
Cars B4 Reduction
Time To Reduce
Reduce By
Minimum Gap
Advance Walk
Delayed Ped
EB
NB Left
All Red Flash Sns
5 MCE Enable
Free Sequence
Start Yel. Override
Start Red Override
1 NB
WB Left
6 0 0
Disable
Phase Not On
0 0
0 0
Local CVM Fash Disable
3 All Red Flash Exit
Enable

0.0 0.0
0 No Ped Startup Call
Max Green 2
0 0
0 0.0
0 Add Initial Calculation
Ped Clear During Yellow
Ped Clear During Red Clr
Yellow Min Override
0 Red Clear
25 4.5

2.0 0
Max Green 1
Yellow Change 4.5 4.5 4.5

2.0 2.0 2.0

0.0 0.0 0.0
Soft Vehicle Recall
Dual Entry
Sim. Gap Disable
0 0 0

0.0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0

0.0 4.5
No Startup Call

2.0 Actuated Rest in Walk
Conditional Svc Enable
Auto Ped Clear
0 Passage
0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0 0
0 0.0
0 0
Man. Control Seq. 1
Startup All Red 6
83 Intelight MAXTIME 2.X
Las Posas
Grand
Startup Flash
Controller Number
0 25
Phase 3
Software
Main Street
Side Street
IP Address
Min Green 2 0
Description
SB
Left
Walk
Ped Clear
Min Green
Passage 2
Extended Mode
10 3.0
40 4.5

2.0 0.0
0 0 0

4.5 4.5

0.0 2.0 2.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
9 7
Min Green 2

0.0 0 0

0.0 0 0 Red Rest
0 0 Ped Recycle
5 6 7 8
0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0
0 3.0 3.0 3.0
0 0
9 0
7 10
5 Auto Flash Entry
Auto Flash Exit
Max Green 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Steady Don't Walk 0 0 0
9 3.0 3.0 3.0
WB
0 0
NB WB
Left EB NB Left SB EB Left
29 0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
All Dark Flash Sns Disable
0 0 0 0
40 25 40 25 40

3.0 0.0

0.0 Red Revert
Backup Time
Disable
Enable

6.0 600
Printed on: 3/25/2021

Sequences
Sequence 1 Sequence 2 Sequence 3 Sequence 4 Sequence 5 Sequence 6 Sequence 7 Sequence 8 Sequence 9 Sequence 10 Sequence 11 Sequence 12 Sequence 13 Sequence 14 Sequence 15 Sequence 16
Standard Overlaps
. . . . .
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
. . . . .
. . . . .
0 0 0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6 Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Off Off Off Off Off
2 3 4 5
Call for Svc
1 Disabled
Off
0 0.0

0.0 0
0 0.0
.
.
.

Startup Call
Recall
4 4
3 2,1,a,4,3,b
Ring Sequence Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
1 2,1,a,3,4,b
3 4 4
4 3
4 3
4 3
4 3
4 2 6,5,a,8,7,b 2 6,5,a,8,7,b 2 6,5,a,8,7,b
1 1,2,a,4,3,b 1
2 6,5,a,8,7,b
Ring Sequence
1 1,2,a,3,4,b
Trail Red
Walk
Ped Clear
Delay
Overlap
Negative Phs
Negative Ovlp
Negative Ped
Green Suppr
Trail Green
Trail Yellow
Modifier Phs
Type
Included Phs
1 1,2,a,4,3,b
2 6,5,a,7,8,b
3 4
3 2 5,6,a,7,8,b
Ring Sequence
4 2 6,5,a,7,8,b 2 5,6,a,8,7,b
Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
1 2,1,a,3,4,b
2 5,6,a,8,7,b
3 4
Ring Sequence
1 1,2,a,3,4,b
2 5,6,a,7,8,b
Ring Sequence
1 1,2,a,3,4,b
2 5,6,a,7,8,b
Overlaps
Enabled
Description
3 4
3 3
4 3
4 3
4 1 1,2,a,3,4,b 1 2,1,a,3,4,b 1 2,1,a,4,3,b 1 2,1,a,4,3,b Ring Sequence Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
3 Ring Sequence
2 5,6,a,7,8,b 2 5,6,a,7,8,b 2 5,6,a,7,8,b
Ring Sequence Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
2 5,6,a,8,7,b 2 5,6,a,8,7,b
3 1 2,1,a,4,3,b 1 1,2,a,3,4,b 1 1,2,a,4,3,b 1 2,1,a,4,3,b Printed on: 3/25/2021

Backup Prevention / No Serve Phases
Sequence 1 Sequence 2 Sequence 3
Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sequence 4 Sequence 5 Sequence 6
Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sequence 7 Sequence 8 Sequence 9
Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Backup phase Backup phase Backup phase
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Serve Phase 1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
6 6 6
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
6 6 6 6 6 6
Backup phase Backup phase Backup phase
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv
8 8 8
Thru Red No Thru Red No Thru Red No
8 8 8 8 8 8
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Serve Phase
1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
6 6 6
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
6 6 6 6 6 6
Backup phase Backup phase Backup phase
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv
8 8 8
Thru Red No Thru Red No Thru Red No
8 8 8 8 8 8
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Serve Phase
1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
6 6 6
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
6 6 6 6 6 6
8 8 8
Thru Red No Thru Red No Thru Red No
8 8 8 8 8 8
Printed on: 3/25/2021

Detector Configuration
Vehicle Detectors Pedestrian Detectors
Global Vehicle Detector Parameters
Global Ped Detector Parameters
Vehicle Detection Options
Detector Reset Enable Enabled Addtnl Call PH No Act Max Pres 4 None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None Erratic Count
2 Failed Recall Call PH Call O/L
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Global Failed Recall
Global No Activity
Global Max Pres.
1 2
2 3
5 6
None
None
20 Max Recall
None 5
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
6 C1-43
J-4
J-5
J-6U
J-6L
J-7U
J-7L
J-8
J-9U C1-59
Global Erratic Ct
7 ------- -------
3 ------- -------
Global No Activity
Global Max Presence
Global Erratic Count
8 X X X X . X X X X X X X . X X X X X
I-1
Added Initial X X X X X . X
J-9L
6 6
6 6
8 8
8 8
5 7
27 28 Detector
2 4
6 8
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
1 5
26 I-2U
I-2L
I-3U
I-3L
I-4
I-5
I-6U
I-6L
I-7U
I-7L
I-8
I-9U
I-9L
J-1
J-2U
J-2L
J-3U
J-3L
C1-58
C1-41
C1-49
C1-55
C1-44
C1-64
C1-63
C1-46
C1-50
C1-57
C1-79
C1-66
C1-62
C1-77
C1-40
C1-48
C1-42 Slot
I-12U C1 Pin Number
C1-67
I-12L
I-13U
I-13L
C1-69
C1-68
C1-70
------- -------
------- -------
C1-56
C1-39
2 2
2 3
4 4
4 4
C1-76
C1-47
C1-78
24 25
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 C1-45
C1-65
4 1
Detector
C1-61
C1-60
6 7 8 9
Yellow Lock Call
Occupancy
Volume
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
.
. . .
1 2 3 4 5
.

X
X
25 26 27 28
. . .
. . . .
.
.

X X
.
.
23 24
. . . . . . . . . .
. .

Call
Queue
Extend
Red Lock Call
22 . . . . . . . . . . . .
.

X X X X X X
. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .

X
. . . . . . . .

X X X X X X X
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
. .
. .
. .

X X
. .
. . . . . . . . .
. . .
. . . . . .
. .
. .
. . .

X X X X X X
. .

X X
. . .

X X X X X X X X
. .
.
.
.

X
.

X
. . .
. . .
. . . Detector Slot C1 Pin Number Call Phase Addtnl Call PH Switch Phase Delay Extend Queue Limit No Activity Max Pres. Erratic Count Fail Time Description . . . . .
7 8 Call O/L
Min Green 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Passage 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Printed on: 3/25/2021

Coordination Configuration
Coordination Parameters Patterns
Split 1 Split 2 Split 3
Split 4 Split 5 Split 6
9 Yellow Auto Permissive Fixed Max Inhibit
Fixed
Fixed
Mode
None
None
None
None
Mode
8 Yellow Auto Permissive Fixed Max Inhibit 1 1 1 1
7 Yellow Auto Permissive Fixed Max Inhibit 1
Description
Auto Permissive
Coord Mode
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Patt. Cycle Offset 1 Split Seq Reference FO Mode
Fixed
Fixed
1 Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Yellow Fixed
1 1
Max Inhibit
.
18 .
26 OL
Pln
1 1
1 1
1 1 1 1
Phs Det Ped
1 1 1
1 Max Mode Pln Pln Pln
Max Inhibit
Max Inhibit
Max Inhibit
Max Inhibit
1 4
1 Fixed None
18 26
Fixed None 1
FO Mode Mode
7 PH. Time Min Max
2 1 1
FO Mode
Fixed
Fixed
1 .

XCoord Phase
Fixed None X
Time
24 42
FO Mode PH.
1 Max Inhibit
Min Max
1 1
1 1 1 1
Fixed None
Fixed None
. . Fixed None
Fixed None
7 . Fixed None
Fixed None
.
4 . .
6 . .
8 5
.
.
. .
.

X 30
Yellow
6 Yellow
Yellow Coord Phase
1 20 Fixed . . None 1 22
Min Cyc Limit % 25
Split Parameters
Max Dwell
Trans. Cover Ped
0 Pattern
.
.
.
.
3 . None 3 .
.

PH. Max Mode PH. Time Min Coord Phase Ref Phase FO Mode 2 36 X Fixed None 2
None
None
None
None
.

Fixed None
FO Mode Mode
Fixed Coord
6 40
16 28
5 16 . None 5
4 . None 4
. Fixed
. Fixed None
.
. None 6
1 2
Time Max Min
.

Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed Phase Ref Phase
.
.
. .

X
.
.

Fixed None
28 .

Yellow
Yellow
X
16 X
2 1 3
Max Cyc Limit %
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed Phase
2 3
.
.
36 17
Operational Mode
Coord Mode
Maximum Mode
Force Mode
Correction Mode
2 100 3
Automatic
Full Permissive
Per Pattern
4 Per Pattern
Shortway (Auto)
25 5
1 3 110
100 24 1 1
1 1 1
.
.

Fixed None
. Fixed None
. Fixed None Ref Phase
.

Fixed None .
.
3 Ref
X
16 .
32 .
5 8
6 20
46 31
Fixed None
2 PH. Time Min Max FO Mode Mode Phase Ref Phase
8 7 . None 7
X
1 . . Fixed None Coord Phase Ref Phase
16 . None 8
2 . . Fixed None
3 . . Fixed None
4 . . Fixed None
Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
7 . . Fixed None
8 . . Fixed None
PH. Time Min Max Coord
1 .
2 .
3 .
5 . .
4 6
5 .
.

Fixed None
. Fixed None
3 . Fixed None
.
.
.
.
. None
8 . Fixed None
. Fixed None
7 . Fixed None
.
.
.

Printed on: 3/25/2021

Split 7 Split 8 Split 9
Advanced Coord Options
Ring Plan 1 Ring Plan 2 Ring Plan 3 Ring Plan 4 Ring Plan 5 Ring Plan 6 Ring Plan 7 Ring Plan 8 Ring Plan 9
3 0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
4 0 0
Offset Early Gap
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Ring
1 2
3 3 0 0
4 0 0
1 0 0
1 0 0
4 2 0 0
2 0 0
3 0
0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 . .
4 3 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
4 0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
1 4 0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
Ring Offset Early Gap
0 2
0 3 0 0
Ring Offset
.

Ring Offset Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
0 4 0 0
Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
4 Offset Early Gap
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Ring Plans
Ring
1 2
3 0
0 7 . . Fixed None
8 . . Fixed None
. Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
.

None
4 . . Fixed None
. Fixed None
2 . . Fixed None
PH. Time Min Max FO Mode Mode Phase
8 . . Fixed None Coord
1 .
3 .
5 . Fixed
. . Fixed None Coord Phase Ref Phase
5 . . Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
3 Fixed None . .
4 . . Fixed None
1 . . Fixed None
2 . . Fixed None
7 . . Fixed None
8 . . Fixed None
5 . . Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
. . Fixed None
2 . . Fixed None
PH. Time Min Max FO Mode Mode FO Mode Mode Coord Phase Ref Phase PH. Time Min Max Phase Ref . .
. .
.
8 .
.
9 Fixed None
Fixed None
7 7
.
. . .

Allow Split Underrun .
4 5 6
Allow Split Overrun .

Ring Plan
. .
4 . .
1 .

Allow No Coord Phase . . . . . .

Coord Now . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.

Pattern 1 2 3
.

Printed on: 3/25/2021

Scheduler Configuration
Schedule 1
1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Schedule 2
1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Schedule 3
1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Day Plan 1 Day Plan 2 Day Plan 3 . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
9 None
10 None
13 None
14 None
15 None
11 None
12 None
19 None
6 None
7 None
8 None
1 2
3 4
5 None
None
None
None
None
Action
Action Commands
Command Action Command Index Action Command Index Index Action Command Index Month of Year Days of Week Days of Month

J F M A M J J A S O N D T W T F S
0 0
4 Pattern
Pattern 1
Description Day Plan 0
S M
0 0
3 Pattern 3
4 Pattern 4
Weekend Plan 0
Special Functions
Event HR MIN ACT Description
Actions
.

Aux
Pattern 2
Action
1 2
. . .

None
12 None
19 None
0 6
Pattern 9
5 Pattern 7
Pattern 8
Pattern 5
Pattern 6
0 Pattern 10
64 Free
20 None
13 None
14 None
20 None
17 None
18 None
15 None
None 16 None
0 0
8 9 0 11
7 7
0 9
10 0
20 0
0 17 None
18 None
0 0
16 5 0
6 0 0
10 30 1
30 2
4 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
8 0
Day Plans
HR MIN
.
4 8
Description
AM Peak
MD Peak
PM Peak
Free
0 0
64 0
0 0
0 Status Enabled
Status Enabled
HR
6 9
14 MIN ACT
Status Disabled
. . . . . .

Event
1 2
3 30 3
64 Free
1 ACT Description
2 3
2 Event
.

S
X
Description Weekday
. .
20 0
0 0
1 9 0
2 3
0 X X
A
Day Plan
8 1
Month of Year Days of Week Days of Month

J F M A M J J A S O N
0 0
. . . . .
10 5
6 7
10 9
6 7
0 0
9 0 0 0
0 5
0 0
0 D S M T W T F S
X . X X X X X .

Month of Year Days of Week
J
X
F M
X

X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X

M J J A S
Weekend
Days of Month
X X X X . . . . .

M T
Description Day Plan 2

O N D S F W T
Printed on: 3/25/2021

Preempt Configuration
Preemption Configuration Preemption Options
Preemption Parameters Preempt Parameters
Track Overlap
Track 2 Overlap
Dwell Ped
Dwell Overlap
Cycling Phase
Cycling Ped
Cycling Overlap
Recovery Exit Omit
Preempt
Enabled
Type
Description
Dwell Phase
Exit Phase
Exit Overlaps
Track Phase
Track 2 Phases
.
.
.
.
6 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
5 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
4 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1 25.5 25.5
Dwell Green
Exit Ped Clear
Exit Yellow Change
Exit Red Clear
0 3 4 5 6

25.5 25.5
255 255
Max Presence
Max Presence Action
Preempt
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6 0
Preempt 1 2
Link
Delay
Min Duration
Min Presence
1 .
.
.

Exit Phases

25.5 25.5
255 255
0 Exit Type

25.5 0

0.0 255
0 Disabled
0 Disabled Disabled
0 0
0 25.5

25.5 25.5
1 .
.
.
.
2 3
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.

Enter Min Walk
Enter Ped Clear
Track Green
Track Yellow Change
Track Red Clear
Track 2 Green
Track 2 Yellow
Track 2 Red
Track Ext. Gate Down
Enter Min Green
Enter Yellow Change
Enter Red Clear
Exit Max Mode
Exit Max Apply Time
Veh Exit Calls
Ped Exit Calls
0 0.0
0 Terminate
0 25.5

25.5 Terminate

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 255 255 255
0 Dwell Ext Time
Max Exit Green
255

25.5 25.5
0 0

25.5 0 0 0
255

25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5
0 0
Terminate Terminate Terminate Terminate
0 0 0 0

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 0 0 0 0
255
0 0 0 0
0 1 1

25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5
0 0 0
. .

Require All Red Entry
Require Gate Down Track Exit
Require Gate Up Dwell Exit
Use Normal On/Normal Off Input
Immediate Ped Clear
Dwell Only Status Output
All Red Flash Dwell
Allow All Overlaps
Ped Recycle in Dwell Cycle
X
.
.
.
.
.

Preempt
Non Lock Mem
Not Overide Flash
Not Overide Next Preempt
Flash Dwell
1 Enabled
Rail Road
BBS Flash
0 0
0 0
Exit Phases Exit Phases Exit Phases Exit Phases Exit Phases Disabled Disabled
0 0 0
Disabled
1 2 3 4 5
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 255 255 255
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5
2 3 4 5 6
Disabled Enabled Enabled Enabled Enabled
Rail Road Emergency Veh Emergency Veh Emergency Veh Emergency Veh 2,5 4,7 1,6 3,8
2,6 4,8 2,6 4,8
Printed on: 3/25/2021

Advanced I/O Configuration
Channel Configuration Concurrency Mode
Auto Concurrency
Channel Options
Cabinet Configuration
IO Modules
Input Points
C11-12 Not Active
Not Active
25 Idx
15 23
14 40
22 Not Active
C11-25
4 42
43 44
45 C1-76 5
C1-77
11 25
41 Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
19 C1-48
C11-29
C11-30
C11-26
C11-27
C11-28
Not Active
Not Active
Vehicle Det Call Not Active
C11-13
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
26 27
28 29
C1-54
C1-49
C11-16
C1-66 C1-82
C1-79
C1-80
C1-81
C1-72
C11-22
C11-17
C11-18
C11-19
C11-20
C11-21
58 59
60 61
54 C11-11
C1-78
C1-62
C1-75 C11-23
C11-24
56 57
Preempt Input
Not Active
C1-58
Vehicle Det Call C1-68
6 17
9 23
6 24
37 C1-73
C1-74
19 20
55 C11-10
3 4
C1-70
C1-71
C1-41
C1-42
Idx C1 Pin
2 16
8 22
3 C1-56
Input Type
Vehicle Det Call
Input Type
C1-43
C1-46
C1-47
5 Vehicle Det Call
Preempt Input
Preempt Input
Preempt Input
Vehicle Det Call
Ch
1 2
3 4
7 8
5 6
7 8
Control Type
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Vehicle Det Call
Phase Ped
Phase Ped
Phase Ped
12 . .
14 IO Module
1 X
1 2 3 4
. .

X X
Type
4 6
5 6 7 8
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Control Type
None
None
None
None
Phase Ped
Source
2 Input
C1-39
C1-40
Ch
9 10
11 12
13 C1 Pin
17 18
Channel
Flash Yellow
Flash Red
Flash Alternate Half Hertz
.

Source
1 2
3 4
5 6
Caltrans 332
X
. . . .

X X
15 .

X
. . X
16 X
X
C1 Pin
C11-15
C1-57 C1-69
C1 Pin
C1-55
C1-59 Input Input
21 7
Idx
2 6
4 8
C1-67 Input33
Input Type
Ped Det Call
50 51
52 49
C1-60
C1-61
34 35
36 38
39 Ped Det Call
Ped Det Call
Ped Det Call
27 13
28 1
53 Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Input Type Idx
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
30 31
32 46
47 48
62 63
64 Unit Interval Advance
Unit Local Flash Sense
Unit Stop Time
18 C1-65 10
24 14 1
15 16
21 Not Active
20 2
1 10
11 12
13 12
1 2
3 4
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
5 6
7 8
9 C1-44
C1-45
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Preempt Input
Preempt Input
Unit Manual Control Enable
Not Active
1 1
C1-51
C1-52
C1-53
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
26 1
C1-50
C1-63
C1-64
15 16
Not Active
14 14,16
Ch
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
. . 9
.
.
8 9 10 11 15 16
. . . . . . .
. . .
13 14
14 15
16 X . . 10
11 12
13 X . . . . . . . .

Concurrency Mode
Auto
Concurrency
5,6,15
5,6,13,15
7,8,16
7,8,14,16
13 13,15
Printed on: 3/25/2021

Cabinet Configuration
Output Points
C1 Pin C1 Pin
Not Active
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Output Type
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Detector Reset
Watchdog
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
64 C11-8
C11-1
5 6
6 6
5 5
C11-4
61 62
63 15
C11-3
18 18
C1-98
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
12 11
11 10
10 10
9 9
C1-88
C1-89
C11-7
3 13
13 15
14 16
3 18
11 1
14 C1-101
C1-102
34 C1-36
37 C1-100
38 42
36 C1-84
9 17
17 17
12 12
39 C1-91
50 C1-93
51 C1-94
7 8
8 8
7 7
15 C11-6
44 C1-86
45 C1-87
60 49
C11-5
48 C1-90
47 2
1 1
1 46
1Output Output Type Idx
14 15
16 2
3 4
5 C1-2
2 2
4 4
4 3
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 C1-3
C1-4
C1-5
C1-6
C1-7
C1-8
C1-9
C1-10
C1-11
17 C1-19 16
28 C1-30
25 C1-27
26 C1-28
27 C1-29
22 C1-24
23 C1-25
18 C1-20
21 C1-23
20 C1-22
19 16
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
31 C1-33
32 C1-34
29 C1-31
30 C1-32
24 C1-26
C1-21
58 C11-2
59 40 C1-103
41 C1-83
56 C1-99
57 52 C1-95
53 C1-96
54 C1-97
55 C1-12
C1-13
C1-15
C1-16
C1-17
C1-18
43 C1-85
35 C1-37
C1-38
Idx
13 Output
33 C1-35
Printed on: 3/25/2021

User Programs
Program 1
Enabled
40 None 0 None None None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
39 None 0 None None
38 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
37 None 0 None None
36 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
35 None 0 None None
34 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
33 None 0 None None
32 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
31 None 0 None None
30 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
29 None 0 None None
28 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
27 None 0 None None
26 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
25 None 0 None None
24 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
23 None 0 None None
22 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
21 None 0 None None
20 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
19 None 0 None None
18 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
17 None 0 None None
16 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
15 None 0 None None
14 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
13 None 0 None None
12 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
11 None 0 None None
10 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
9 None 0 None None
8 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
0 None 0.0 0.0
7 None 0 None None
6 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
5 None 0 None None
4 None 0 None None
3 None 0 None None None 0.0 0.0
None None
None 0.0 0.0 Aux switch stop time
Parameter B Idx Dly Ext Description
1 Unit Stop Time 1 Result=A Aux Switch State
Line Result Idx Operation Parameter A Idx
2 None None 0.0 0.0
Printed on: 3/25/2021
Do Not Reproduce
Do Not Reproduce
Do Not Reproduce
Do Not Reproduce
Do Not Reproduce

Phase Timing and Options
Unit Information Phase Timing Phase Options
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

X X X X X X X X
. . . X . . . X
. X . . . X . .

X X X X X X X X
. X . . . X . .
. . . . . . . .

Unit Parameters . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . X . . . X
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. X . X . X . X
Phase Configuration Global Phase Recalls Notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .

City of San Marcos
Via Vera Cruz @ Linda Vista
Phase
Enable
Non Lock Detector
Min Vehicle Recall
Max Vehicle Recall
Ped Recall
0 0
6 0 5 0 5 0 5
0 23 0 18 0
1 2 4
6 4
2 Phase
1 7
8 EB Left
Phase
Min
Max
Ped
Green No Walk
Phase Not On
Phase Not On WB
Green No Walk
SB
Phase Not On
Description
SB Left
Startup
Phase Not On
Phase Not On
Added Initial
Maximum Initial
Time B4 Reduction
Cars B4 Reduction
Time To Reduce
Reduce By
Minimum Gap
Advance Walk
Delayed Ped
EB
NB Left
All Red Flash Sns
5 MCE Enable
Free Sequence
Start Yel. Override
Start Red Override
1 NB
WB Left
6 0 0
Disable
Phase Not On
0 0
0 0
Local CVM Fash Disable
3 All Red Flash Exit
Enable

0.0 0.0
0 No Ped Startup Call
Max Green 2
0 0
0 0.0
0 Add Initial Calculation
Ped Clear During Yellow
Ped Clear During Red Clr
Yellow Min Override
0 Red Clear
25 4.5

1.5 0
Max Green 1
Yellow Change 4.5 4.5 4.5

1.5 1.5 1.5

0.0 0.0 0.0
Soft Vehicle Recall
Dual Entry
Sim. Gap Disable
0 0 0

0.0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0

0.0 4.5
No Startup Call

1.5 Actuated Rest in Walk
Conditional Svc Enable
Auto Ped Clear
0 Passage
0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0 0
0 0.0
0 0
Man. Control Seq. 1
Startup All Red 6
89 Intelight MAXTIME 2.X
Via Vera Cruz
Linda Vista
Startup Flash
Controller Number
0 25
Phase 3
Software
Main Street
Side Street
IP Address
Min Green 2 0
Description
SB
Left
Walk
Ped Clear
Min Green
Passage 2
Extended Mode
7 3.0
40 4.5

1.5 0.0
0 0 0

4.5 4.5

0.0 1.5 1.5

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6 7
Min Green 2

0.0 0 0

0.0 0 0 Red Rest
0 0 Ped Recycle
5 6 7 8
0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0
0 3.0 3.0 3.0
0 0
7 0
5 7
5 Auto Flash Entry
Auto Flash Exit
Max Green 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Steady Don't Walk 0 0 0
6 3.0 3.0 3.0
WB
0 0
NB WB
Left EB NB Left SB EB Left
18 23

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
All Dark Flash Sns Disable
0 0 0 0
30 25 40 25 30

3.0 0.0

0.0 Red Revert
Backup Time
Disable
Enable

6.0 600
Printed on: 3/25/2021

Sequences
Sequence 1 Sequence 2 Sequence 3 Sequence 4 Sequence 5 Sequence 6 Sequence 7 Sequence 8 Sequence 9 Sequence 10 Sequence 11 Sequence 12 Sequence 13 Sequence 14 Sequence 15 Sequence 16
Standard Overlaps
. . . . .
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
. . . . .
. . . . .
0 0 0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6 Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Off Off Off Off Off
2 3 4 5
Call for Svc
1 Disabled
Off
0 0.0

0.0 0
0 0.0
.
.
.

Startup Call
Recall
4 4
3 2,1,a,4,3,b
Ring Sequence Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
1 2,1,a,3,4,b
3 4 4
4 3
4 3
4 3
4 3
4 2 6,5,a,8,7,b 2 6,5,a,8,7,b 2 6,5,a,8,7,b
1 1,2,a,4,3,b 1
2 6,5,a,8,7,b
Ring Sequence
1 1,2,a,3,4,b
Trail Red
Walk
Ped Clear
Delay
Overlap
Negative Phs
Negative Ovlp
Negative Ped
Green Suppr
Trail Green
Trail Yellow
Modifier Phs
Type
Included Phs
1 1,2,a,4,3,b
2 6,5,a,7,8,b
3 4
3 2 5,6,a,7,8,b
Ring Sequence
4 2 6,5,a,7,8,b 2 5,6,a,8,7,b
Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
1 2,1,a,3,4,b
2 5,6,a,8,7,b
3 4
Ring Sequence
1 1,2,a,3,4,b
2 5,6,a,7,8,b
Ring Sequence
1 1,2,a,3,4,b
2 5,6,a,7,8,b
Overlaps
Enabled
Description
3 4
3 3
4 3
4 3
4 1 1,2,a,3,4,b 1 2,1,a,3,4,b 1 1,2,a,4,3,b 1 2,1,a,4,3,b Ring Sequence Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
3 Ring Sequence
2 5,6,a,7,8,b 2 5,6,a,7,8,b 2 5,6,a,7,8,b
Ring Sequence Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
2 5,6,a,8,7,b 2 5,6,a,8,7,b
3 1 2,1,a,4,3,b 1 1,2,a,3,4,b 1 1,2,a,4,3,b 1 2,1,a,4,3,b Printed on: 3/25/2021

Backup Prevention / No Serve Phases
Sequence 1 Sequence 2 Sequence 3
Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sequence 4 Sequence 5 Sequence 6
Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sequence 7 Sequence 8 Sequence 9
Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Backup phase Backup phase Backup phase
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Serve Phase 1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
6 6 6
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
6 6 6 6 6 6
Backup phase Backup phase Backup phase
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv
8 8 8
Thru Red No Thru Red No Thru Red No
8 8 8 8 8 8
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Serve Phase
1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
6 6 6
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
6 6 6 6 6 6
Backup phase Backup phase Backup phase
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv
8 8 8
Thru Red No Thru Red No Thru Red No
8 8 8 8 8 8
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Serve Phase
1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
6 6 6
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
6 6 6 6 6 6
8 8 8
Thru Red No Thru Red No Thru Red No
8 8 8 8 8 8
Printed on: 3/25/2021

Detector Configuration
Vehicle Detectors Pedestrian Detectors
Global Vehicle Detector Parameters
Global Ped Detector Parameters
Vehicle Detection Options
Detector Reset Enable Enabled Addtnl Call PH No Act Max Pres 4 None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None Erratic Count
2 Failed Recall Call PH Call O/L
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Global Failed Recall
Global No Activity
Global Max Pres.
1 2
2 3
5 6
None
None
20 Max Recall
None 5
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
6 C1-43
J-4
J-5
J-6U
J-6L
J-7U
J-7L
J-8
J-9U C1-59
Global Erratic Ct
7 ------- -------
3 ------- -------
Global No Activity
Global Max Presence
Global Erratic Count
8 X X X X . X X X X X X X . X X X X X
I-1
Added Initial X X X X X . X
J-9L
6 6
6 6
8 8
8 8
5 7
27 28 Detector
2 4
6 8
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
1 5
26 I-2U
I-2L
I-3U
I-3L
I-4
I-5
I-6U
I-6L
I-7U
I-7L
I-8
I-9U
I-9L
J-1
J-2U
J-2L
J-3U
J-3L
C1-58
C1-41
C1-49
C1-55
C1-44
C1-64
C1-63
C1-46
C1-50
C1-57
C1-79
C1-66
C1-62
C1-77
C1-40
C1-48
C1-42 Slot
I-12U C1 Pin Number
C1-67
I-12L
I-13U
I-13L
C1-69
C1-68
C1-70
------- -------
------- -------
C1-56
C1-39
2 2
2 3
4 4
4 4
C1-76
C1-47
C1-78
24 25
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 C1-45
C1-65
4 1
Detector
C1-61
C1-60
6 7 8 9
Yellow Lock Call
Occupancy
Volume
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
.
. . .
1 2 3 4 5
.

X
X
25 26 27 28
. . .
. . . .
.
.

X X
.
.
23 24
. . . . . . . . . .
. .

Call
Queue
Extend
Red Lock Call
22 . . . . . . . . . . . .
.

X X X X X X
. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .

X
. . . . . . . .

X X X X X X X
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
. .
. .
. .

X X
. .
. . . . . . . . .
. . .
. . . . . .
. .
. .
. . .

X X X X X X
. .

X X
. . .

X X X X X X X X
. .
.
.
.

X
.

X
. . .
. . .
. . . Detector Slot C1 Pin Number Call Phase Addtnl Call PH Switch Phase Delay Extend Queue Limit No Activity Max Pres. Erratic Count Fail Time Description . . . . .
7 8 Call O/L
Min Green 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Passage 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Printed on: 3/25/2021

Coordination Configuration
Coordination Parameters Patterns
Split 1 Split 2 Split 3
Split 4 Split 5 Split 6
9 Yellow Auto Permissive Fixed Max Inhibit
Fixed
Fixed
Mode
None
None
None
None
Mode
8 Yellow Auto Permissive Fixed Max Inhibit 1 1 1 1
7 Yellow Auto Permissive Fixed Max Inhibit 1
Description
Auto Permissive
Coord Mode
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Patt. Cycle Offset 1 Split Seq Reference FO Mode
Fixed
Fixed
1 Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Yellow Fixed
1 1
Max Inhibit
.
.

OL
Pln
1 1
1 1
1 1 1 1
Phs Det Ped
1 1 1
1 Max Mode Pln Pln Pln
Max Inhibit
Max Inhibit
Max Inhibit
Max Inhibit
1 4
1 Fixed None
Fixed None 1
FO Mode Mode
7 PH. Time Min Max
2 1 1
FO Mode
Fixed
Fixed
1 .
.Coord Phase
Fixed None .

FO Mode PH. Time
1 Max Inhibit
Min Max
1 1
1 1 1 1
Fixed None
Fixed None
. . Fixed None
Fixed None
7 . Fixed None
Fixed None
.
4 . .
6 . .
8 5
.
.
. .
.
.

Yellow
6 Yellow
Yellow Coord Phase
1 . . Fixed None 1
Min Cyc Limit % 25
Split Parameters
Max Dwell
Trans. Cover Ped
0 Pattern
.
.
.
.
3 . None 3 .
.

PH. Max Mode PH. Time Min Coord Phase Ref Phase FO Mode 2 . Fixed None 2
None
None
None
None
.

Fixed None
FO Mode Mode
Fixed Coord
6 5 . None 5
4 . None 4
. Fixed
. Fixed None
.
. None 6
Time Max Min
.

Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed Phase Ref Phase
.
.
. .
.
.
.

Fixed None
.

Yellow
Yellow
.
.

Max Cyc Limit %
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed Phase
.
.

Operational Mode
Coord Mode
Maximum Mode
Force Mode
Correction Mode
2 Manual Free
Full Permissive
Per Pattern
4 Per Pattern
Shortway (Auto)
25 5
1 3
1 1
1 1 1
.
.

Fixed None
. Fixed None
. Fixed None Ref Phase
.

Fixed None .
.
3 Ref
.
.
.
5 8
6 Fixed None
2 PH. Time Min Max FO Mode Mode Phase Ref Phase
8 7 . None 7
.
1 . . Fixed None Coord Phase Ref Phase
. None 8
2 . . Fixed None
3 . . Fixed None
4 . . Fixed None
Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
7 . . Fixed None
8 . . Fixed None
PH. Time Min Max Coord
1 .
2 .
3 .
5 . .
4 6
5 .
.

Fixed None
. Fixed None
3 . Fixed None
.
.
.
.
. None
8 . Fixed None
. Fixed None
7 . Fixed None
.
.
.

Printed on: 3/25/2021

Split 7 Split 8 Split 9
Advanced Coord Options
Ring Plan 1 Ring Plan 2 Ring Plan 3 Ring Plan 4 Ring Plan 5 Ring Plan 6 Ring Plan 7 Ring Plan 8 Ring Plan 9
3 0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
4 0 0
Offset Early Gap
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Ring
1 2
3 3 0 0
4 0 0
1 0 0
1 0 0
4 2 0 0
2 0 0
3 0
0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 . .
4 3 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
4 0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
1 4 0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
Ring Offset Early Gap
0 2
0 3 0 0
Ring Offset
.

Ring Offset Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
0 4 0 0
Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
4 Offset Early Gap
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Ring Plans
Ring
1 2
3 0
0 7 . . Fixed None
8 . . Fixed None
. Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
.

None
4 . . Fixed None
. Fixed None
2 . . Fixed None
PH. Time Min Max FO Mode Mode Phase
8 . . Fixed None Coord
1 .
3 .
5 . Fixed
. . Fixed None Coord Phase Ref Phase
5 . . Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
3 Fixed None . .
4 . . Fixed None
1 . . Fixed None
2 . . Fixed None
7 . . Fixed None
8 . . Fixed None
5 . . Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
. . Fixed None
2 . . Fixed None
PH. Time Min Max FO Mode Mode FO Mode Mode Coord Phase Ref Phase PH. Time Min Max Phase Ref . .
. .
.
8 .
.
9 Fixed None
Fixed None
7 7
.
. . .

Allow Split Underrun .
4 5 6
Allow Split Overrun .

Ring Plan
. .
4 . .
1 .

Allow No Coord Phase . . . . . .

Coord Now . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.

Pattern 1 2 3
.

Printed on: 3/25/2021

Scheduler Configuration
Schedule 1
1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Schedule 2
1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Schedule 3
1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Day Plan 1 Day Plan 2 Day Plan 3 . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
9 None
10 None
13 None
14 None
15 None
11 None
12 None
19 None
6 None
7 None
8 None
1 2
3 4
5 None
None
None
None
None
Action
Action Commands
Command Action Command Index Action Command Index Index Action Command Index Month of Year Days of Week Days of Month

J F M A M J J A S O N D T W T F S
0 0
4 Pattern
Pattern 1
Description Day Plan 0
S M
0 0
3 Pattern 3
4 Pattern 4
0 Special Functions
Event HR MIN ACT Description
Actions
.

Aux
Pattern 2
Action
1 2
. . .

None
12 None
19 None
0 6
Pattern 9
5 Pattern 7
Pattern 8
Pattern 5
Pattern 6
0 Pattern 10
64 Free
20 None
13 None
14 None
20 None
17 None
18 None
15 None
None 16 None
0 0
8 9 0 11
7 7
0 9
10 0
0 0
0 17 None
18 None
0 0
16 5 0
6 0 0
10 0
0 4
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
8 0
Day Plans
HR MIN
.
4 8
Description
0 0
0 0
0 0
Status Enabled
Status Enabled
HR
0 0
0 MIN ACT
Status Disabled
. . . . . .

Event
1 2
3 0
1 ACT Description
3 2
Event
.

S
X
Description Weekday
. .
0 0
0 0
1 0 0
2 3
0 X X
A
Day Plan
8 1
Month of Year Days of Week Days of Month

J F M A M J J A S O N
0 0
. . . . .
10 5
6 7
10 9
6 7
0 0
9 0 0 0
0 5
0 0
0 D S M T W T F S
X . X X X X X .

Month of Year Days of Week
J
X
F M
X

X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X

M J J A S
Weekend
Days of Month
X X X X . . . . .

M T
Description Day Plan 2

O N D S F W T
Printed on: 3/25/2021

Preempt Configuration
Preemption Configuration Preemption Options
Preemption Parameters Preempt Parameters
Track Overlap
Track 2 Overlap
Dwell Ped
Dwell Overlap
Cycling Phase
Cycling Ped
Cycling Overlap
Recovery Exit Omit
Preempt
Enabled
Type
Description
Dwell Phase
Exit Phase
Exit Overlaps
Track Phase
Track 2 Phases
.
.
.
.
6 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
5 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
4 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1 25.5 25.5
Dwell Green
Exit Ped Clear
Exit Yellow Change
Exit Red Clear
0 3 4 5 6

25.5 25.5
255 255
Max Presence
Max Presence Action
Preempt
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6 0
Preempt 1 2
Link
Delay
Min Duration
Min Presence
1 .
.
.

Exit Phases

25.5 25.5
255 255
0 Exit Type

25.5 0

0.0 255
0 Disabled
0 Disabled Disabled
0 0
0 25.5

25.5 25.5
1 .
.
.
.
2 3
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.

Enter Min Walk
Enter Ped Clear
Track Green
Track Yellow Change
Track Red Clear
Track 2 Green
Track 2 Yellow
Track 2 Red
Track Ext. Gate Down
Enter Min Green
Enter Yellow Change
Enter Red Clear
Exit Max Mode
Exit Max Apply Time
Veh Exit Calls
Ped Exit Calls
0 0.0
0 Terminate
0 25.5

25.5 Terminate

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 255 255 255
0 Dwell Ext Time
Max Exit Green
255

25.5 25.5
0 0

25.5 0 0 0
255

25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5
0 0
Terminate Terminate Terminate Terminate
0 0 0 0

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 0 0 0 0
255
0 0 0 0
0 1 1

25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5
0 1 1
. .

Require All Red Entry
Require Gate Down Track Exit
Require Gate Up Dwell Exit
Use Normal On/Normal Off Input
Immediate Ped Clear
Dwell Only Status Output
All Red Flash Dwell
Allow All Overlaps
Ped Recycle in Dwell Cycle
X
.
.
.
.
.

Preempt
Non Lock Mem
Not Overide Flash
Not Overide Next Preempt
Flash Dwell
1 Enabled
Rail Road
BBS Flash
1 1
0 0
Exit Phases Exit Phases Exit Phases Exit Phases Exit Phases Disabled Disabled
0 0 0
Disabled
1 2 3 4 5
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 255 255 255
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5
2 3 4 5 6
Disabled Enabled Enabled Enabled Enabled
Rail Road Emergency Veh Emergency Veh Emergency Veh Emergency Veh 2,5 4,7 1,6 3,8
2,6 4,8 2,6 4,8
Printed on: 3/25/2021

Advanced I/O Configuration
Channel Configuration Concurrency Mode
Auto Concurrency
Channel Options
Cabinet Configuration
IO Modules
Input Points
C11-12 Not Active
Not Active
25 Idx
15 23
14 40
22 Not Active
C11-25
4 42
43 44
45 C1-76 5
C1-77
11 25
41 Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
19 C1-48
C11-29
C11-30
C11-26
C11-27
C11-28
Not Active
Not Active
Vehicle Det Call Not Active
C11-13
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
26 27
28 29
C1-54
C1-49
C11-16
C1-66 C1-82
C1-79
C1-80
C1-81
C1-72
C11-22
C11-17
C11-18
C11-19
C11-20
C11-21
58 59
60 61
54 C11-11
C1-78
C1-62
C1-75 C11-23
C11-24
56 57
Preempt Input
Not Active
C1-58
Vehicle Det Call C1-68
6 17
9 23
6 24
37 C1-73
C1-74
19 20
55 C11-10
3 4
C1-70
C1-71
C1-41
C1-42
Idx C1 Pin
2 16
8 22
3 C1-56
Input Type
Vehicle Det Call
Input Type
C1-43
C1-46
C1-47
5 Vehicle Det Call
Preempt Input
Preempt Input
Preempt Input
Vehicle Det Call
Ch
1 2
3 4
7 8
5 6
7 8
Control Type
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Vehicle Det Call
Phase Ped
Phase Ped
Phase Ped
12 . .
14 IO Module
1 X
1 2 3 4
. .

X X
Type
4 6
5 6 7 8
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Control Type
None
None
None
None
Phase Ped
Source
2 Input
C1-39
C1-40
Ch
9 10
11 12
13 C1 Pin
17 18
Channel
Flash Yellow
Flash Red
Flash Alternate Half Hertz
.

Source
1 2
3 4
5 6
Caltrans 332
X
. . . .

X X
15 .

X
. . X
16 X
X
C1 Pin
C11-15
C1-57 C1-69
C1 Pin
C1-55
C1-59 Input Input
21 7
Idx
2 6
4 8
C1-67 Input33
Input Type
Ped Det Call
50 51
52 49
C1-60
C1-61
34 35
36 38
39 Ped Det Call
Ped Det Call
Ped Det Call
27 13
28 1
53 Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Input Type Idx
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
30 31
32 46
47 48
62 63
64 Unit Interval Advance
Unit Local Flash Sense
Unit Stop Time
18 C1-65 10
24 14 1
15 16
21 Not Active
20 2
1 10
11 12
13 12
1 2
3 4
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
5 6
7 8
9 C1-44
C1-45
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Preempt Input
Preempt Input
Unit Manual Control Enable
Not Active
1 1
C1-51
C1-52
C1-53
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
26 1
C1-50
C1-63
C1-64
15 16
Not Active
14 14,16
Ch
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
. . 9
.
.
8 9 10 11 15 16
. . . . . . .
. . .
13 14
14 15
16 X . . 10
11 12
13 X . . . . . . . .

Concurrency Mode
Auto
Concurrency
5,6,15
5,6,13,15
7,8,16
7,8,14,16
13 13,15
Printed on: 3/25/2021

Cabinet Configuration
Output Points
C1 Pin C1 Pin
Not Active
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Output Type
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Detector Reset
Watchdog
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
64 C11-8
C11-1
5 6
6 6
5 5
C11-4
61 62
63 15
C11-3
18 18
C1-98
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
12 11
11 10
10 10
9 9
C1-88
C1-89
C11-7
3 13
13 15
14 16
3 18
11 1
14 C1-101
C1-102
34 C1-36
37 C1-100
38 42
36 C1-84
9 17
17 17
12 12
39 C1-91
50 C1-93
51 C1-94
7 8
8 8
7 7
15 C11-6
44 C1-86
45 C1-87
60 49
C11-5
48 C1-90
47 2
1 1
1 46
1Output Output Type Idx
14 15
16 2
3 4
5 C1-2
2 2
4 4
4 3
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 C1-3
C1-4
C1-5
C1-6
C1-7
C1-8
C1-9
C1-10
C1-11
17 C1-19 16
28 C1-30
25 C1-27
26 C1-28
27 C1-29
22 C1-24
23 C1-25
18 C1-20
21 C1-23
20 C1-22
19 16
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
31 C1-33
32 C1-34
29 C1-31
30 C1-32
24 C1-26
C1-21
58 C11-2
59 40 C1-103
41 C1-83
56 C1-99
57 52 C1-95
53 C1-96
54 C1-97
55 C1-12
C1-13
C1-15
C1-16
C1-17
C1-18
43 C1-85
35 C1-37
C1-38
Idx
13 Output
33 C1-35
Printed on: 3/25/2021

User Programs
Program 1
Enabled
40 None 0 None None None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
39 None 0 None None
38 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
37 None 0 None None
36 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
35 None 0 None None
34 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
33 None 0 None None
32 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
31 None 0 None None
30 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
29 None 0 None None
28 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
27 None 0 None None
26 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
25 None 0 None None
24 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
23 None 0 None None
22 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
21 None 0 None None
20 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
19 None 0 None None
18 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
17 None 0 None None
16 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
15 None 0 None None
14 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
13 None 0 None None
12 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
11 None 0 None None
10 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
9 None 0 None None
8 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
0 None 0.0 0.0
7 None 0 None None
6 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
5 None 0 None None
4 None 0 None None
3 None 0 None None None 0.0 0.0
None None
None 0.0 0.0 Aux switch stop time
Parameter B Idx Dly Ext Description
1 Unit Stop Time 1 Result=A Aux Switch State
Line Result Idx Operation Parameter A Idx
2 None None 0.0 0.0
Printed on: 3/25/2021

Phase Timing and Options
Unit Information Phase Timing Phase Options
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
X X . . . X . X
. . . . . . . X
. X . . . X . .

X X . . . X . X
. X . . . X . .
. . . . . . . .

Unit Parameters . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. X . . . . . .

Phase Configuration Global Phase Recalls Notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .

City of San Marcos
Grand @ Bent
Phase
Enable
Non Lock Detector
Min Vehicle Recall
Max Vehicle Recall
Ped Recall
0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
1 2 4
6 4
2 Phase
1 7
8 Phase
Min
Max
Ped
Green No Walk
None
Phase Not On NB
Green No Walk
WB
Phase Not On
Description
WB Left
Startup
None
None
Added Initial
Maximum Initial
Time B4 Reduction
Cars B4 Reduction
Time To Reduce
Reduce By
Minimum Gap
Advance Walk
Delayed Ped
All Red Flash Sns
5 MCE Enable
Free Sequence
Start Yel. Override
Start Red Override
1 EB
6 0 0
Disable
None
0 0
0 0
Local CVM Fash Disable
3 All Red Flash Exit
Enable

0.0 0.0
0 No Ped Startup Call
Max Green 2
0 0
0 0.0
0 Add Initial Calculation
Ped Clear During Yellow
Ped Clear During Red Clr
Yellow Min Override
0 Red Clear
5 4.0

1.2 0
Max Green 1
Yellow Change 3.0 4.8 3.0

0.0 1.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0
Soft Vehicle Recall
Dual Entry
Sim. Gap Disable
0 0 0

0.0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0

0.0 4.0
No Startup Call

1.0 Actuated Rest in Walk
Conditional Svc Enable
Auto Ped Clear
0 Passage
0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0 0
0 0.0
0 0
Man. Control Seq. 1
Startup All Red 6
115
Intelight MAXTIME 2.X
Grand
Bent
Startup Flash
Controller Number
0 0
Phase 3
Software
Main Street
Side Street
IP Address
Min Green 2 0
Description
WB
Left
Walk
Ped Clear
Min Green
Passage 2
Extended Mode
15 3.0
23 4.8

1.0 0.0
0 0 0

3.0 3.0

0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0
Min Green 2

0.0 0 0

0.0 0 0 Red Rest
0 0 Ped Recycle
5 6 7 8
0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0
0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0
7 0
0 15
5 Auto Flash Entry
Auto Flash Exit
Max Green 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Steady Don't Walk 0 0 0
0 3.0 0.0 3.0
NB
0 0
EB WB
18 0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
All Dark Flash Sns Disable
0 0 0 0
0 0 13 0 25

3.0 0.0

0.0 Red Revert
Backup Time
Disable
Enable

6.0 600
Printed on: 3/25/2021

Sequences
Sequence 1 Sequence 2 Sequence 3 Sequence 4 Sequence 5 Sequence 6 Sequence 7 Sequence 8 Sequence 9 Sequence 10 Sequence 11 Sequence 12 Sequence 13 Sequence 14 Sequence 15 Sequence 16
Standard Overlaps
. . . . .
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
. . . . .
. . . . .
0 0 0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6 Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Off Off Off Off Off
2 3 4 5
Call for Svc
1 Disabled
Off
0 0.0

0.0 0
0 0.0
.
.
.

Startup Call
Recall
4 4
3 2,1,a,4,3,b
Ring Sequence Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
1 2,1,a,3,4,b
3 4 4
4 3
4 3
4 3
4 3
4 2 6,5,a,8,7,b 2 6,5,a,8,7,b 2 6,5,a,8,7,b
1 1,2,a,4,3,b 1
2 6,5,a,8,7,b
Ring Sequence
1 1,2,a,3,4,b
Trail Red
Walk
Ped Clear
Delay
Overlap
Negative Phs
Negative Ovlp
Negative Ped
Green Suppr
Trail Green
Trail Yellow
Modifier Phs
Type
Included Phs
1 1,2,a,4,3,b
2 6,5,a,7,8,b
3 4
3 2 5,6,a,7,8,b
Ring Sequence
4 2 6,5,a,7,8,b 2 5,6,a,8,7,b
Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
1 2,1,a,3,4,b
2 5,6,a,8,7,b
3 4
Ring Sequence
1 1,2,a,b
2 6,a,8,b
Ring Sequence
1 1,2,a,b
2 6,a,8,b
Overlaps
Enabled
Description
3 4
3 3
4 3
4 3
4 1 1,2,a,b 1 2,1,a,3,4,b 1 1,2,a,4,3,b 1 2,1,a,4,3,b
Ring Sequence Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
3 Ring Sequence
2 6,a,8,b 2 5,6,a,7,8,b 2 5,6,a,7,8,b
Ring Sequence Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
2 5,6,a,8,7,b 2 5,6,a,8,7,b
3 1 2,1,a,4,3,b 1 1,2,a,3,4,b 1 1,2,a,4,3,b 1 2,1,a,4,3,b Printed on: 3/25/2021

Backup Prevention / No Serve Phases
Sequence 1 Sequence 2 Sequence 3
Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sequence 4 Sequence 5 Sequence 6
Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sequence 7 Sequence 8 Sequence 9
Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Backup phase Backup phase Backup phase
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Serve Phase 1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
6 6 6
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
6 6 6 6 6 6
Backup phase Backup phase Backup phase
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv
8 8 8
Thru Red No Thru Red No Thru Red No
8 8 8 8 8 8
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Serve Phase
1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
6 6 6
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
6 6 6 6 6 6
Backup phase Backup phase Backup phase
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv
8 8 8
Thru Red No Thru Red No Thru Red No
8 8 8 8 8 8
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Serve Phase
1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
6 6 6
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
6 6 6 6 6 6
8 8 8
Thru Red No Thru Red No Thru Red No
8 8 8 8 8 8
Printed on: 3/25/2021

Detector Configuration
Vehicle Detectors Pedestrian Detectors
Global Vehicle Detector Parameters
Global Ped Detector Parameters
Vehicle Detection Options
Detector Reset Enable Enabled Addtnl Call PH No Act Max Pres 4 None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None Erratic Count
2 Failed Recall Call PH Call O/L
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Global Failed Recall
Global No Activity
Global Max Pres.
1 2
2 3
5 6
None
None
20 Max Recall
None 5
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
6 C1-43
J-4
J-5
J-6U
J-6L
J-7U
J-7L
J-8
J-9U C1-59
Global Erratic Ct
7 ------- -------
3 ------- -------
Global No Activity
Global Max Presence
Global Erratic Count
8 X X X X . X X X X X X X . X X X X X
I-1
Added Initial X X X X X . X
J-9L
6 6
6 6
8 8
8 8
5 7
27 28 Detector
2 4
6 8
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
1 5
26 I-2U
I-2L
I-3U
I-3L
I-4
I-5
I-6U
I-6L
I-7U
I-7L
I-8
I-9U
I-9L
J-1
J-2U
J-2L
J-3U
J-3L
C1-58
C1-41
C1-49
C1-55
C1-44
C1-64
C1-63
C1-46
C1-50
C1-57
C1-79
C1-66
C1-62
C1-77
C1-40
C1-48
C1-42 Slot
I-12U C1 Pin Number
C1-67
I-12L
I-13U
I-13L
C1-69
C1-68
C1-70
------- -------
------- -------
C1-56
C1-39
2 2
2 3
4 4
4 4
C1-76
C1-47
C1-78
24 25
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 C1-45
C1-65
4 1
Detector
C1-61
C1-60
6 7 8 9
Yellow Lock Call
Occupancy
Volume
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
.
. . .
1 2 3 4 5
.

X
X
25 26 27 28
. . .
. . . .
.
.

X X
.
.
23 24
. . . . . . . . . .
. .

Call
Queue
Extend
Red Lock Call
22 . . . . . . . . . . . .
.

X X X X X X
. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .

X
. . . . . . . .

X X X X X X X
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
. .
. .
. .

X X
. .
. . . . . . . . .
. . .
. . . . . .
. .
. .
. . .

X X X X X X
. .

X X
. . .

X X X X X X X X
. .
.
.
.

X
.

X
. . .
. . .
. . . Detector Slot C1 Pin Number Call Phase Addtnl Call PH Switch Phase Delay Extend Queue Limit No Activity Max Pres. Erratic Count Fail Time Description . . . . .
7 8 Call O/L
Min Green 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Passage 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Printed on: 3/25/2021

Coordination Configuration
Coordination Parameters Patterns
Split 1 Split 2 Split 3
Split 4 Split 5 Split 6
9 Yellow Auto Permissive Fixed Max Inhibit
Fixed
Fixed
Mode
None
None
None
None
Mode
8 Yellow Auto Permissive Fixed Max Inhibit 1 1 1 1
7 Yellow Auto Permissive Fixed Max Inhibit 1
Description
Auto Permissive
Coord Mode
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Patt. Cycle Offset 1 Split Seq Reference FO Mode
Fixed
Fixed
1 Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Yellow Fixed
1 1
Max Inhibit
.
.

OL
Pln
1 1
1 1
1 1 1 1
Phs Det Ped
1 1 1
1 Max Mode Pln Pln Pln
Max Inhibit
Max Inhibit
Max Inhibit
Max Inhibit
1 4
1 Fixed None
Fixed None 1
FO Mode Mode
7 PH. Time Min Max
2 1 1
FO Mode
Fixed
Fixed
1 .
.Coord Phase
Fixed None .

FO Mode PH. Time
1 Max Inhibit
Min Max
1 1
1 1 1 1
Fixed None
Fixed None
. . Fixed None
Fixed None
7 . Fixed None
Fixed None
.
4 . .
6 . .
8 5
.
.
. .
.
.

Yellow
6 Yellow
Yellow Coord Phase
1 . . Fixed None 1
Min Cyc Limit % 25
Split Parameters
Max Dwell
Trans. Cover Ped
0 Pattern
.
.
.
.
3 . None 3 .
.

PH. Max Mode PH. Time Min Coord Phase Ref Phase FO Mode 2 . Fixed None 2
None
None
None
None
.

Fixed None
FO Mode Mode
Fixed Coord
6 5 . None 5
4 . None 4
. Fixed
. Fixed None
.
. None 6
Time Max Min
.

Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed Phase Ref Phase
.
.
. .
.
.
.

Fixed None
.

Yellow
Yellow
.
.

Max Cyc Limit %
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed Phase
.
.

Operational Mode
Coord Mode
Maximum Mode
Force Mode
Correction Mode
2 Manual Free
Full Permissive
Per Pattern
4 Per Pattern
Shortway (Auto)
25 5
1 3
1 1
1 1 1
.
.

Fixed None
. Fixed None
. Fixed None Ref Phase
.

Fixed None .
.
3 Ref
.
.
.
5 8
6 Fixed None
2 PH. Time Min Max FO Mode Mode Phase Ref Phase
8 7 . None 7
.
1 . . Fixed None Coord Phase Ref Phase
. None 8
2 . . Fixed None
3 . . Fixed None
4 . . Fixed None
Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
7 . . Fixed None
8 . . Fixed None
PH. Time Min Max Coord
1 .
2 .
3 .
5 . .
4 6
5 .
.

Fixed None
. Fixed None
3 . Fixed None
.
.
.
.
. None
8 . Fixed None
. Fixed None
7 . Fixed None
.
.
.

Printed on: 3/25/2021

Split 7 Split 8 Split 9
Advanced Coord Options
Ring Plan 1 Ring Plan 2 Ring Plan 3 Ring Plan 4 Ring Plan 5 Ring Plan 6 Ring Plan 7 Ring Plan 8 Ring Plan 9
3 0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
4 0 0
Offset Early Gap
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Ring
1 2
3 3 0 0
4 0 0
1 0 0
1 0 0
4 2 0 0
2 0 0
3 0
0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 . .
4 3 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
4 0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
1 4 0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
Ring Offset Early Gap
0 2
0 3 0 0
Ring Offset
.

Ring Offset Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
0 4 0 0
Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
4 Offset Early Gap
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Ring Plans
Ring
1 2
3 0
0 7 . . Fixed None
8 . . Fixed None
. Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
.

None
4 . . Fixed None
. Fixed None
2 . . Fixed None
PH. Time Min Max FO Mode Mode Phase
8 . . Fixed None Coord
1 .
3 .
5 . Fixed
. . Fixed None Coord Phase Ref Phase
5 . . Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
3 Fixed None . .
4 . . Fixed None
1 . . Fixed None
2 . . Fixed None
7 . . Fixed None
8 . . Fixed None
5 . . Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
. . Fixed None
2 . . Fixed None
PH. Time Min Max FO Mode Mode FO Mode Mode Coord Phase Ref Phase PH. Time Min Max Phase Ref . .
. .
.
8 .
.
9 Fixed None
Fixed None
7 7
.
. . .

Allow Split Underrun .
4 5 6
Allow Split Overrun .

Ring Plan
. .
4 . .
1 .

Allow No Coord Phase . . . . . .

Coord Now . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.

Pattern 1 2 3
.

Printed on: 3/25/2021

Scheduler Configuration
Schedule 1
1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Schedule 2
1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Schedule 3
1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Day Plan 1 Day Plan 2 Day Plan 3 . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
9 None
10 None
13 None
14 None
15 None
11 None
12 None
19 None
6 None
7 None
8 None
1 2
3 4
5 None
None
None
None
None
Action
Action Commands
Command Action Command Index Action Command Index Index Action Command Index Month of Year Days of Week Days of Month

J F M A M J J A S O N D T W T F S
0 0
4 Pattern
Pattern 1
Description Day Plan 0
S M
0 0
3 Pattern 3
4 Pattern 4
0 Special Functions
Event HR MIN ACT Description
Actions
.

Aux
Pattern 2
Action
1 2
. . .

None
12 None
19 None
0 6
Pattern 9
5 Pattern 7
Pattern 8
Pattern 5
Pattern 6
0 Pattern 10
64 Free
20 None
13 None
14 None
20 None
17 None
18 None
15 None
None 16 None
0 0
8 9 0 11
7 7
0 9
10 0
0 0
0 17 None
18 None
0 0
16 5 0
6 0 0
10 0
0 4
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
8 0
Day Plans
HR MIN
.
4 8
Description
0 0
0 0
0 0
Status Enabled
Status Enabled
HR
0 0
0 MIN ACT
Status Disabled
. . . . . .

Event
1 2
3 0
1 ACT Description
3 2
Event
.

S
X
Description Weekday
. .
0 0
0 0
1 0 0
2 3
0 X X
A
Day Plan
8 1
Month of Year Days of Week Days of Month

J F M A M J J A S O N
0 0
. . . . .
10 5
6 7
10 9
6 7
0 0
9 0 0 0
0 5
0 0
0 D S M T W T F S
X . X X X X X .

Month of Year Days of Week
J
X
F M
X

X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X

M J J A S
Weekend
Days of Month
X X X X . . . . .

M T
Description Day Plan 2

O N D S F W T
Printed on: 3/25/2021

Preempt Configuration
Preemption Configuration Preemption Options
Preemption Parameters Preempt Parameters
Track Overlap
Track 2 Overlap
Dwell Ped
Dwell Overlap
Cycling Phase
Cycling Ped
Cycling Overlap
Recovery Exit Omit
Preempt
Enabled
Type
Description
Dwell Phase
Exit Phase
Exit Overlaps
Track Phase
Track 2 Phases
.
.
.
.
6 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
5 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
4 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1 25.5 25.5
Dwell Green
Exit Ped Clear
Exit Yellow Change
Exit Red Clear
0 3 4 5 6

25.5 25.5
255 255
Max Presence
Max Presence Action
Preempt
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6 0
Preempt 1 2
Link
Delay
Min Duration
Min Presence
1 .
.
.

Exit Phases

25.5 25.5
255 255
0 Exit Type

25.5 0

0.0 255
1 Disabled
0 Disabled Disabled
0 0
0 25.5

25.5 25.5
1 .
.
.
.
2 3
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.

Enter Min Walk
Enter Ped Clear
Track Green
Track Yellow Change
Track Red Clear
Track 2 Green
Track 2 Yellow
Track 2 Red
Track Ext. Gate Down
Enter Min Green
Enter Yellow Change
Enter Red Clear
Exit Max Mode
Exit Max Apply Time
Veh Exit Calls
Ped Exit Calls
0 0.0
0 Terminate
0 25.5

25.5 Terminate

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 255 0 255
0 Dwell Ext Time
Max Exit Green
255

25.5 25.5
0 0

25.5 0 0 0
255

25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5
0 0
Terminate Terminate Terminate Terminate
0 0 0 0

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 0 0 0 0
255
0 0 0 0
0 1 0

25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5
0 5 0
. .

Require All Red Entry
Require Gate Down Track Exit
Require Gate Up Dwell Exit
Use Normal On/Normal Off Input
Immediate Ped Clear
Dwell Only Status Output
All Red Flash Dwell
Allow All Overlaps
Ped Recycle in Dwell Cycle
X
.
.
.
.
.