San Marcos City Council
March 26, 2024

ATTACHMENT D

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

APPENDIX N
LTA
Prepared For Prepared By
Capalina SMA, LLC
179 Calle Magdalena #201
Encinitas, CA 92025
CR Associates
3900 Fifth Avenue, Suite 310
San Diego, CA 92103

CAPALINA

DEVELOPMENT
AUGUST 8, 2023
Local Transportation Analysis
C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
ES. 1
Executive Summary
Project Description and Setting
The project applicant is requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA22-0003), Rezone (R22-0003), and a Site Development Plan (SDP22-0007). If approved, these entitlements would allow for the development of 119 apartment units and 4,000 square feet (s.f.) of commercial use. Of the 119 apartment units, 6 are affordable units. The assumed opening year of the Proposed Project is 2025.

The Proposed Project is located on a 2.5-acre vacant infill parcel at N. Rancho Santa Fe & Capalina Road, in the City of San Marcos. The site is surrounded by commercial, residential uses, and a Christian church, located along a light-rail transit line (SPRINTER). The existing zoning is MU-3 (Mixed Use Commercial - No Residential) with a maximum height of 4-stories/54 feet.

Access to the project site would be provided via two full-access driveways, one at each end of the project site, along Capalina Road which will operate as two-way stop-controlled intersections.

Additionally, the project proposes to re-stripe Capalina Road along the project frontage with a center left-turn lane.

It is important to note that the land uses (commercial and office) allowed under the MU-3 zone category are anticipated to generate significantly higher trips than those generated by the Proposed Project.

Per the City’s Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (TIAG), trip generation rates were derived from the SANDAG’s (not so) Brief Guide to Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002). The Proposed Project is anticipated to generate 874 daily trips, including 63 trips (15-in/48-out) during the AM peak hour and 80 (54-in/26-out) trips during the PM peak hour.

The following nine (9) roadway segments and ten (10) intersections were included for analysis:

Roadway Segments
 N. Rancho Santa Fe Road, between W. Mission Road and Capalina Road  N. Rancho Santa Fe Road, between Capalina Road and SR-78 Westbound Ramps  N. Rancho Santa Fe Road, between SR-78 Westbound and SR-78 Eastbound Ramps  N. Rancho Santa Fe Road, between SR-78 Eastbound Ramps and Descanso Avenue  N. Pacific Street, between W. Mission Road and Capalina Road  N. Pacific Street, between Capalina Road and Descanso Avenue  W. Mission Road, between N. Rancho Santa Fe Road and N. Pacific Street  Capalina Road, between N. Rancho Santa Fe Road and N. Pacific Street  Descanso Avenue, between N. Pacific Street and N. Las Posas Road

C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
ES. 2
Intersections

1. N. Rancho Santa Fe Road & W. Mission Road (Signal)

2. N. Pacific Street (west) & W. Mission Road (Signal)

3. N. Pacific Street (east) & W. Mission Road (Signal)

4. N. Rancho Santa Fe Road & Capalina Road (Signal)

5. N. Pacific Street & Capalina Road (Side-Street Stop-Controlled)

6. N. Rancho Santa Fe Road & SR-78 Westbound Ramps (Signal)

7. N. Rancho Santa Fe Road & SR-78 Eastbound Ramps (Signal)

8. N. Las Posas Road & Descanso Avenue (Signal)

9. Project Driveway #1 & Capalina Road (Side-Street Stop-Controlled)

10. Project Driveway #2 & Capalina Road (Side-Street Stop-Controlled) The LOS analysis conducted as a part of this study was used to evaluate the effects of the Proposed Project on the transportation circulation network. Per the City’s TIAG, the City of San Marcos strives to maintain intersection and roadway segment operations based on LOS standards outlined in the General Plan Mobility Element. Improvements should be identified for any study facilities that do not meet City LOS standards to increase performance to acceptable or pre-project conditions.

LOS Deficiencies and Improvement Requirements
Determination of the Need for Off-Site Improvements to Accommodate Project Traffic – Near-Term Year 2025 with Project Conditions
Roadway Segment Analysis
No improvements required.

Intersection Analysis
No improvements required.

Determination of the Need for Off-Site Improvements to Accommodate Project Traffic – Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions
Roadway Segment Analysis
No improvements required.

Intersection Analysis
No improvements required.

Queue Analysis
The 95th percentile queue at the following left-turn pocket is anticipated to exceed the available storage with the addition of Project traffic:

N. Rancho Santa Fe & Capalina Road
 Westbound Left-Turn (AM Peak Hour) – At most, 125 feet of 95th percentile queue would exceed storage length under Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions. Extending this turn pocket would be feasible and would require re-striping.

C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
Page i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... ES.1 Project Description and Setting ...................................................................................................................... ES.1 LOS Deficiencies and Improvement Requirements ....................................................................................... ES.2

1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description .................................................................................................................................... 1 Report Organization ................................................................................................................................... 4

2.0 Analysis Methodology ................................................................................................................... 5 Level of Service (LOS) Definition ............................................................................................................... 5 Roadway Segment LOS Standards and Thresholds ................................................................................ 5 Peak Hour Intersection LOS Standards and Thresholds ......................................................................... 6

2.3.1 Signalized Intersections .................................................................................................................. 7

2.3.2 Unsignalized Intersections ............................................................................................................. 8 Determination of Project Study Area ........................................................................................................ 8 City of San Marcos LOS Standards ........................................................................................................... 9

3.0 Project Traffic ............................................................................................................................. 10 Project Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................ 10 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment ............................................................................................... 10 Project Study Area ................................................................................................................................... 19

4.0 Existing Conditions ..................................................................................................................... 21 Existing Transportation Network ............................................................................................................. 21 Active Transportation ............................................................................................................................... 21

4.2.1 Transit Access ............................................................................................................................... 21

4.2.2 Bicycle ............................................................................................................................................ 25

4.2.3 Pedestrian ..................................................................................................................................... 25 Existing Intersection Volumes ................................................................................................................. 25 Existing Traffic Conditions ....................................................................................................................... 28

4.4.1 Roadway Segment Analysis .......................................................................................................... 28

4.4.2 Intersection Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 28

5.0 Near-Term Year 2025 Conditions .............................................................................................. 30 Cumulative Project Traffic ....................................................................................................................... 30 Cumulative Project Trip Generation ........................................................................................................ 33 Near-Term Year 2025 Base Roadway Network and Traffic Volumes ................................................... 36 Near-Term Year 2025 Base Traffic Conditions ...................................................................................... 36

5.4.1 Roadway Segment Analysis .......................................................................................................... 36

5.4.2 Intersection Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 39 Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project Roadway Network and Traffic Volumes ............................... 39 Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project Traffic Conditions .................................................................. 42

5.6.1 Roadway Segment Analysis .......................................................................................................... 42

5.6.2 Intersection Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 43

6.0 Horizon Year 2050 Conditions ................................................................................................... 45 C R

1.1 1.2

2.1 2.2

2.3 2.4

2.5 3.1

3.2 3.3

4.1 4.2

4.3 4.4

5.1 5.2

5.3 5.4

5.5 5.6
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
Page ii
Horizon Year 2050 Roadway Network and Traffic Volumes ................................................................. 45 Horizon Year 2050 Traffic Conditions .................................................................................................... 48

6.2.1 Roadway Segment Analysis .......................................................................................................... 48

6.2.2 Intersection Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 49 Horizon Year 2050 with Project Roadway Network and Traffic Volumes ............................................. 49 Horizon Year 2050 with Project Traffic Conditions ................................................................................ 52

6.4.1 Roadway Segment Analysis .......................................................................................................... 52

6.4.2 Intersection Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 53

7.0 LOS Deficiencies and Improvement Requirements ................................................................... 55 Determination of the Need for Off-Site Improvements to Accommodate Project Traffic – Near-Term Year 2025 with Project Conditions ......................................................................................................... 55 Determination of the Need for Off-Site Improvements to Accommodate Project Traffic – Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions.................................................................................................................. 55

8.0 Site Access & Circulation ........................................................................................................... 56 Driveway Access....................................................................................................................................... 56 Queuing Analysis ...................................................................................................................................... 56 Internal Circulation .................................................................................................................................. 58 Sight Distance Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 58

9.0 Parking. ...................................................................................................................................... 60 Appendices
Appendix A - Memorandum of Approach – Capalina Development Project Appendix B - Signal Timing Sheets
Appendix C - Existing Traffic Counts
Appendix D - LOS Calculation Worksheets – Existing Conditions Appendix E - Cumulative Project Information
Appendix F - LOS Calculation Worksheets – Near-Term Year 2025 Base Conditions Appendix G - LOS Calculation Worksheets – Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project Conditions Appendix H - Transportation Forecast Information Center (TFIC) Volumes and Horizon Year 2050 Volume Development
Appendix I - LOS Calculation Worksheets – Horizon Year 2050 Conditions Appendix J - LOS Calculation Worksheets – Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions Appendix K - Intersection Queue Reports
Appendix L - Sight Distance Study
C R

6.1 6.2

6.3 6.4

7.1 7.2

8.1 8.2

8.3 8.4
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
Page iii
List of Figures
Figure 1.1 - Project Regional Location ........................................................................................................ 2 Figure 1.2 - Project Site Plan ....................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 3.1 - Project Trip Distribution ........................................................................................................ 11 Figure 3.2 - Project Trip Assignment ........................................................................................................ 13 Figure 3.3 - Project Study Area................................................................................................................. 20 Figure 4.1 - Roadway Classification and Intersection Geometrics – Existing Conditions .................... 23 Figure 4.2 - Traffic Volumes – Existing Conditions ................................................................................. 26 Figure 5.1 - Cumulative Projects Location............................................................................................... 32 Figure 5.2 - Cumulative Project Trip Assignment .................................................................................... 34 Figure 5.3 - Traffic Volumes – Near-Term Year 2025 Base Conditions ................................................ 37 Figure 5.4 - Traffic Volumes – Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project Conditions ............................ 40 Figure 6.1 - Traffic Volumes – Horizon Year 2050 Conditions............................................................... 46 Figure 6.2 - Traffic Volumes – Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions .......................................... 50 C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
Page iv
List of Tables
Table 1.1 - Trip Generation Comparison .................................................................................................... 1 Table 2.1 - LOS Definitions .......................................................................................................................... 5 Table 2.2 - Roadway Segment Daily Capacity and LOS Standards .......................................................... 6 Table 2.3 - Signalized Intersection LOS Operational Analysis Method ..................................................... 7 Table 2.4 - LOS Criteria for Stop-Controlled Unsignalized Intersections .................................................. 8 Table 3.1 - Project Trip Generation - LTA ................................................................................................. 10 Table 4.1 - Existing Transportation Network Characteristics ................................................................. 22 Table 4.2 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Existing Conditions ........................................................ 28 Table 4.3 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Existing Conditions ................................................. 29 Table 5.1 - Cumulative Project Trip Generation ...................................................................................... 33 Table 5.2 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Near-Term Year 2025 Base Conditions ....................... 36 Table 5.3 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Near-Term Year 2025 Base Conditions ................ 39 Table 5.4 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project Conditions .. 42 Table 5.5 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project Conditions .............................................................................................................................................. 44 Table 6.1 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 Conditions ..................................... 48 Table 6.2 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 Conditions .............................. 49 Table 6.3 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions ................. 52 Table 6.4 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 Base with Project Conditions 54 Table 8.1 - Queuing Analysis at Project Driveways ................................................................................. 57 Table 8.2 - Minimum Intersection Sight Distances ................................................................................. 58 Table 8.3 - Measured Sight Distances..................................................................................................... 59 C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

1.0 Introduction
The purpose of this Local Transportation Analysis (LTA) is to evaluate the effect the Capalina Development project (the “Proposed Project”) has on the transportation circulation network to determine if improvements are required for the roadway network.

Project Description
The project applicant is requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA22-0003), Rezone (R22-0003), and a Site Development Plan (SDP22-0007). If approved, these entitlements would allow for the development of 119 apartment units and 4,000 square feet (s.f.) of commercial use. Of the 119 apartment units, 6 are affordable units. The assumed opening year of the Proposed Project is 2025.

The Proposed Project is located on a 2.5-acre vacant infill parcel at N. Rancho Santa Fe & Capalina Road, in the incorporated City of San Marcos. The site is surrounded by commercial, residential uses, and a Christian church, located along a light-rail transit line (SPRINTER). The existing zoning is MU-3 (Mixed Use Commercial - No Residential) with a maximum height of 4-stories/54 feet.

Access to the project site would be provided via two full-access driveways, one at each end of the project site, along Capalina Road which will operate as two-way stop-controlled intersections.

Additionally, the project proposes to re-stripe Capalina Road along the project frontage with a center left-turn lane. Figure 1.1 displays the Proposed Project’s regional location. Figure 1.2 displays the site plan for the Proposed Project.

It is important to note that the land uses (commercial and office) allowed under the MU-3 zone category are anticipated to generate significantly higher trips than those generated by the Proposed Project. Table 1.1 displays the comparison between trip generation rates allowed under MU-3 zone category and the Proposed Project.

Table 1.1 - Trip Generation Comparison
Scenario Land Use Trip Generation Rate Units ADT
MU-3
Specialty Retail/Strip Commercial 40/KSF 10 KSF 400
Office Standard Commercial (Less Than 100,000 SF) 20/KSF 90 KSF 1,800 Proposed
Specialty Retail/Strip Commercial 40/KSF 4 KSF 160
Multi-Family (More than 20 DU/acre) 6/DU 119 DU 714
Source: SANDAG (not so) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002) Notes:

MU-3 = Mixed-Use 3 ADT = Average Daily Traffic
SF = Square Feet KSF = 1,000 Square Feet
DU = Dwelling Unit
As shown, land uses allowed under MU-3 would generate significantly higher trips when compared to Proposed Project land uses.

The LOS analysis conducted as a part of this study was used to evaluate the effects of the Proposed Project on the transportation circulation network. Per the City’s TIAG, the City of San Marcos strives to maintain intersection and roadway segment operations based on LOS standards outlined in the General Plan Mobility Element. Improvements should be identified for any study facilities that do not meet City LOS standards to increase performance to acceptable or pre-project conditions.

C R

1.1 Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 1.1
Project Regional Location
Project
Site
N 0 1,600 3,200 Feet
.:iri r
C R
<,;
r:l
(/)
0 a..

Ill
r:l
...J w Bor en Ra z
Tw in
0 ks
Golf
San Marco
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 1.2
Project Site Plan

CAPALINA ROAD

W MISSION ROAD

5.0'

40.0'

10.0' 30.0' REC
AREA
7,500 SF

FITNESS

CO-WORK LEASE
TRASH
TRASH
MAIL
415.7'
257.5'
318.8'
EV2

LIGHTED DIRECTORY MAP
PER FIRE DEPT. STANDARDS

LIGHTED DIRECTORY MAP
PER FIRE DEPT. STANDARDS

BUS STOP

35.4'

94.0'
R.O.W.

45.4'

48.6'

NCTD ROW

PROPOSED ROW

TYPICAL STREET TREE

IN FUTURE PARKWAY
A
B
C
EV2
EV3 EV3 EV3 EV3 EV3 EV3 EV3 EV3 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2
EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2
EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2
EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1
EV1 EV1 EV1

6.0'

24.0'

71.8' 66.9'

37.7'

24.0'

24.0'

24.0'

6.0'

6.0'

5.0'

6.0'

75.2'

73.2'

6.0'

C O M M E R C I A L

16.0'

2.0'
BUMBER

OVERHANG
TYPICAL PARKING DIMENSIONS (NTS) 18.0' 5.0'

WALKWAY

STANDARD STALL ACCESSIBLE STALL

8.0' 9.0'

18.0'

9.0'

41.5'

6.5'

BIKE LANE

3.5'

11.5' 11.5' 12.0'

TURN LANE

12.0' 12.5'

4.0'
MEDIAN

7.0'

SIDEWALK
R.O.W.

32.0'

45.5'

EXISTING

CONDITION

WEST BOUND

SIDE AND MEDIAN

45.0'

FUTURE BUILDOUT

EAST BOUND SIDE

2.0'
BUFFER

5.5'

BIKE LANE

7.0'

SIDEWALK

6.0'

PARKWAY

MISSION ROAD

94.0'
PROPOSED R.O.W

PROPOSED
R.O.W.

PROPOSED R.O.W.

NCTD

MISSION ROAD

41.5'

6.5'

BIKE LANE

3.5'

11.5' 11.5' 12.0'

TURN LANE

12.0' 12.5'

4.0'
MEDIAN

7.0'

SIDEWALK
R.O.W.

32.0'

2.0'
BUFFER

5.5'

BIKE LANE

7.0'

SIDEWALK

6.0'

PARKWAY

MISSION ROAD

94.0'
PROPOSED R.O.W
PROPOSEDR.O.W.

MISSION ROAD
NCTD

SECTION 'A'

35.0'

3.5'

12.0' 12.5' 19.0' 16.0'

8.0'
MEDIAN

7.0'

SIDEWALK
R.O.W.

32.0'

2.0'
BUFFER

5.5'

BIKE LANE

7.0'

SIDEWALK

8.5'

PARKWAY

MISSION ROAD

94.0'
PROPOSED R.O.W

PROPOSED
R.O.W.

MISSION ROAD
NCTD

SECTION 'B'

23.0'

3.5'

11.5' 11.5' 11.0' 12.0'

8.0'
MEDIAN

7.0'

SIDEWALK
R.O.W.

30.0'

7.0'
BUFFER

7.0'
SIDEWALK 22.5'

PARKWAY

MISSION ROAD

94.0'
PROPOSED R.O.W

PROPOSED
R.O.W.

MISSION ROAD
NCTD

SECTION 'C'
EXISTINGR.O.W.

EXISTINGR.O.W.

EXISTINGR.O.W.

EXISTINGR.O.W.

8.5'

6.0'

6.0'

22.5'
5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404
Bonsall, CA 92003
760.724.1198 ARCHITECTURE SCALE:

APRIL 5, 2023

SAN MARCOS, CA
Capalina SMA, LLC
179 Calle Magdalena #201
Encinitas, CA 92024
Attn: Jon Rilling

CAPALINA APTS
GPA22-0003 PROJECT SUMMARY
4-STORY STACKED FLATS
CONSTRUCTION TYPE V-A (1-HOUR)
OCCUPANCY R-2 / B
SPRINKLERS NFPA 13

ADDRESS CAPALINA ROAD
APN 2191153300
EXISTING ZONING MU-3
PROPOSED ZONING MU-2
COMMERCIAL 4,000 SF*
TOTAL HOMES 119 APTS
GROSS AREA 2.51 AC
NET AREA 2.41 AC
DENSITY 47.4 DU/AC
PARKING 147 SPACES
FAR 1.24

UNIT MIX
11 PLAN 1 STUDIO/1BA 600 SF
8 PLAN 2 1BD/1BA 680 SF
45 PLAN 3 1BD/1BA 710 SF
6 PLAN 4 2BD/1BA 925 SF
41 PLAN 5 2BD/2BA 1,080 SF
8 PLAN 6 3BD/2BA 1,130 SF
119 TOTAL UNITS
PARKING SUMMARY*

RESIDENTIAL
TOTAL REQUIRED 142 SP

COMMERCIAL PARKING
TOTAL REQUIRED 5 SP
TOTAL PROVIDED 147 SP
OPEN SPACE*
PRIVATE 7,632 SF
INDOOR COMMON 1,250 SF
OUTDOOR COMMON 25,700 SF
TOTAL 34,582 SF
*REFER TO SHEET A-SP2 FOR DETAILED INFORMATION
0 30 60 90

CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN
N A-SP
LEGEND

ACCESSIBLE SPACE
EV1 EV CAPABLE SPACE
EV2 EV READY SPACE
EV3 EV CHARGERS

ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL

RETAINING WALL
'- " -?: :----" .., ~
~
~ ~ I -~
~ ..., -~
', I
,•, = I -
L~ I
L..I i I X ---=- X
I
I=
C R
~
j
~
rt- ------1 -1 1 t- , .

I ' I b ---t4- =1
I I""""\+ H----4 + ~
1 1 I
---1 I
1 1
1 1 I
I 11 t~I I -l\ + f- I-~ + +j+-
6-
D
D
D
1 1 I
1-1-1 + H + 1+1--
~
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

Report Organization
Following this introductory chapter, this report is organized into the following chapters:

2. Analysis Methodology – This chapter reviews the methods utilized to evaluate any potential General Plan inconsistencies associated with the implementation of the Proposed Project, as required by the City of San Marcos Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (TIAG).

3. Project Traffic - This chapter describes the Proposed Project’s land uses and associated trip generation. Additional information such as trip distribution patterns and project trip assignment are also included in this chapter, which is used to determine the project study area.

4. Existing Conditions – This chapter describes and evaluates the existing transportation network. Vehicular operations within the study area are evaluated. LOS analysis results are also provided for existing vehicular traffic conditions. Additionally, the Proposed Project’s access to transit as well as pedestrian and bicycle facilities are evaluated.

Recommendations are offered to enhance the experience and safety for both pedestrians and bicyclists.

5. Near-Term Year 2025 Conditions – This chapter describes near-term developments anticipated to generate additional study area trips and establishes a near-term baseline against which traffic generated by the Proposed Project can be compared to at the project opening day, assumed to be Year 2025. LOS analysis results are also provided for Near-Term Year 2025 Base and Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project vehicular traffic conditions.

6. Horizon Year 2050 Conditions – This chapter describes projected long-range conditions of the transportation network within the study area. Horizon Year 2050 scenario analysis is required per the City’s TIAG. LOS analysis results are also provided for Horizon Year 2050 and Horizon Year 2050 with Project vehicular traffic conditions.

7. LOS Deficiencies and Improvement Requirements - This chapter identifies any substandard facilities and provides improvement requirements to improve substandard facilities to acceptable LOS or pre-project conditions.

8. Site Access & Circulation – This chapter addresses access to the Proposed Project site, discusses the functionality of the Proposed Project’s internal circulation, queue analysis, and intersection sight distance at the project driveways.

9. Parking – This chapter describes the parking requirements per City of San Marcos Code of Ordinance and parking provided by the Proposed Project.

C R

1.2 Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

2.0 Analysis Methodology
This study was performed in accordance with the standards and requirements in the City of San Marcos TIAG (November 2020). All analysis assumptions were documented within a scoping agreement memorandum, provided in Appendix A, and approved by the City of San Marcos. The following sections describe the analysis methods outlined in the TIAG used to evaluate the traffic effect as a result of the Proposed Project in relation to LOS.

Level of Service (LOS) Definition
Level of Service (LOS) is a quantitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and the motorist’s and/or passengers’ perception of operations. A LOS definition generally describes these conditions in terms of such factors as delay, speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, interruptions in traffic flow, queuing, comfort, and convenience. Table 2.1 describes generalized definitions of the various LOS categories (A through F) as applied to roadway operations.

Table 2.1 - LOS Definitions
LOS Category Definition of Operation
A
This LOS represents a completely free-flow condition, where the operation of vehicles is virtually unaffected by the presence of other vehicles and only constrained by the geometric features of the highway and by driver preferences.

B
This LOS represents a relatively free-flow condition, although the presence of other vehicles becomes noticeable. Average travel speeds are the same as in LOS A, but drivers have slightly less freedom to maneuver.

C At this LOS, the influence of traffic density on operations becomes marked. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is clearly affected by other vehicles.

D
At this LOS, the ability to maneuver is notably restricted due to traffic congestion, and only minor disruptions can be absorbed without extensive queues forming and the service deteriorating.

E
This LOS represents operations at or near capacity. LOS E is an unstable level, with vehicles operating with minimum spacing for maintaining uniform flow. At LOS E, disruptions cannot be dissipated readily thus causing deterioration down to LOS F.

F
At this LOS, forced or breakdown of traffic flow occurs, although operations appear to be at capacity, queues form behind these breakdowns. Operations within queues are highly unstable, with vehicles experiencing brief periods of movement followed by stoppages.

Source: Highway Capacity Manual 7th Edition
Roadway Segment LOS Standards and Thresholds
Roadway segment LOS standards and thresholds provide the basis for analysis of arterial roadway segment performance. The analysis of roadway segment LOS is based on the functional classification of the roadway, the maximum capacity, roadway geometrics, and existing or forecast Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes. Table 2.2 displays roadway segment capacity standards found in the City’s TIAG. The actual capacity of a roadway facility varies according to its physical attributes.

C R

2.1 2.2
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 2.2 - Roadway Segment Daily Capacity and LOS Standards Street Classification LOS/ADT Thresholds

A B C D E
Expressway (6-lane) < 30,000 < 42,000 < 60,000 < 70,000 < 80,000 Prime Arterial (6-lane) < 25,000 < 35,000 < 50,000 < 55,000 < 60,000 Major Arterial (6-lane, divided) < 20,000 < 28,000 < 40,000 < 45,000 < 50,000 Major Arterial (4-lane, divided) < 15,000 < 21,000 < 30,000 < 35,000 < 40,000 Major Arterial (3-lane, one-way) < 12,500 < 16,500 < 22,500 < 25,000 < 27,500 Major Arterial (2-lane, one-way) <10,000 <13,000 <17,500 <20,000 <22,500 Secondary Arterial / Collector (4-lane w/ center
lane) < 10,000 < 14,000 < 20,000 < 25,000 < 30,000
Collector (4-lane w/o center lane) < 5,000 < 7,000 < 10,000 < 13,000 < 15,000 Collector (2-lane w/ continuous left-turn lane) < 5,000 < 7,000 < 10,000 < 13,000 < 15,000 Collector (2-lane no fronting property) < 4,000 < 5,500 < 7,500 < 9,000 < 10,000 Collector (2-lane w/ commercial fronting) < 2,500 < 3,500 < 5,000 < 6,500 < 8,000 Collector (2-lane w/ multi-family) < 2,500 < 3,500 < 5,000 < 6,500 < 8,000 Collector (3-lane, one-way) < 11,000 < 14,000 < 19,000 < 22,500 < 26,000 Collector (2-lane, one-way) < 7,500 < 9,500 < 12,500 < 15,000 < 17,500 Collector (1-lane, one-way) < 2,500 < 3,500 < 5,000 < 6,500 < 7,500 Sub-Collector (2-lane single family) - - < 2,200 - -
Source: City of San Marcos Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (November 2020) Note:

Bold number indicates the ADT thresholds for acceptable LOS.

These standards are generally used as long-range planning guidelines to determine the functional classification of roadways. The actual capacity of a roadway varies according to its physical attributes. Typically, the performance and LOS of a roadway segment is heavily influenced by the ability of its intersections to accommodate peak hour traffic volumes. For the purposes of this traffic analysis, LOS D or better is considered acceptable for circulation element roadway segments.

Peak Hour Intersection LOS Standards and Thresholds
This section presents the methodologies used to perform peak hour intersection capacity analyses at signalized and unsignalized intersections within the study area. The following assumptions were utilized in conducting all intersection LOS analyses:
 Peak Hour Factor (PHF) – Field-collected PHF for Existing and Near-Term Year 2025 Base Conditions. A PHF of 0.95 was assumed for Horizon Year 2050 analysis.  Lane Utilization Factor – HCM 6th Edition defaults were used for all scenarios.  Conflicting Pedestrians/Bicycles – Existing pedestrian and bicycle counts are utilized for all scenarios.
 Signal Timing – Based on existing signal timing plans (as of October 2022), provided in Appendix B.

C R

2.3 Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

2.3.1 Signalized Intersections
The analysis of signalized intersections utilized the operational analysis procedure as outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition signalized (Chapter 19) intersection analysis methodology. This method defines LOS in terms of delay, or more specifically, average stopped delay per vehicle. Delay is a measure of driver and/or passenger discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption and lost travel time. This technique uses 1,900 vehicles per hour per lane (VPHPL) as the maximum saturation volume of an intersection. This saturation volume is adjusted to account for lane width, on‐street parking, pedestrians, traffic composition (i.e., percentage trucks) and shared lane movements (i.e., through and right‐turn movements originating from the same lane). The LOS criteria used for the analysis of signalized intersections are described in Table 2.3, identifying the thresholds of control delays and the associated LOS. The computerized analysis of intersection operations was performed utilizing the Synchro Version 11 traffic analysis software by Trafficware Ltd.

Table 2.3 - Signalized Intersection LOS Operational Analysis Method Average Stopped
Delay Per Vehicle
(Seconds)
LOS Characteristics
<10
LOS A describes operations with very low delay. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay.
>10– 20 LOS B describes operations with generally good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. >20 – 35
LOS C describes operations with higher delays, which may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level.

The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping.
>35– 55
LOS D describes operations with high delay, resulting from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high volumes. The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable, and individual cycle failures are noticeable. >55 – 80 LOS E is considered the limit of acceptable delay. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences.
>80
LOS F describes a condition of excessively high delay, considered unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs when arrival flow rates exceed the LOS D capacity of the intersection. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay.

Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition
C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

2.3.2 Unsignalized Intersections
Unsignalized intersections were analyzed using the Highway Capacity 6th Edition side-street stop (Chapter 20) and all-way stop (Chapter 21) intersection analysis methodology. The computerized analysis of intersection operations was performed utilizing the Synchro Version 11 traffic analysis software by Trafficware Ltd.

LOS was determined as follows:
 All-way stop intersections: Reported for the entire intersection as an average value  Side-street stop intersections: Reported for the worst-case movement The LOS criteria used for the analysis of unsignalized intersections are described in Table 2.4.

Table 2.4 - LOS Criteria for Stop-Controlled Unsignalized Intersections Average Stopped Delay Per Vehicle (Seconds) LOS
0 – 10 A
>10 – 15 B
>15 – 25 C
>25 – 35 D
>35 – 50 E
> 50 F
Source: Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition
Determination of Project Study Area
Per the City’s TIAG, the study area was defined using the following criteria:
 Signalized and unsignalized intersections along and adjacent to the project site  Site access driveways
 Any classified (non-residential) roadway segments that are linked to the intersections that are being studied
C R

2.4 Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

City of San Marcos LOS Standards
This section outlines the Mobility Element Policies that are relevant to the Proposed Project. The City of San Marcos strives to maintain intersection and roadway segment operations LOS standards based on the following policy:
 Policy M-1.4: LOS D or better for Vehicles as a prioritized mode – Generally provides facilities that have minimum vehicle congestion during peak periods. Most motorists are delayed less than 55 seconds at a signal (or less than one signalized cycle).

Based on the policy listed above, LOS D or better is considered acceptable for study roadway segments and intersections. The TIAG provides the following thresholds to determine if the Proposed Project is required to provide improvements for study area facilities:
 Implementation of the Proposed Project triggers a roadway segment operating at acceptable LOS to operate at unacceptable LOS and increases the volume/capacity (V/C) ratio by more than 0.02.
 Implementation of the Proposed Project increases the V/C ratio for a study roadway segment that is already operating at unacceptable LOS by more than 0.02.  Implementation of the Proposed Project triggers an intersection operating at acceptable LOS to operate at unacceptable LOS and increases the average delay per vehicle by more than

2.0 seconds.
 Implementation of the Proposed Project increases the average delay for a study intersection that is already operating at unacceptable LOS by more than 2.0 seconds.

Improvements should be identified to increase performance to acceptable or pre-project conditions under each scenario.

C R

2.5 Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

3.0 Project Traffic
This chapter describes the Proposed Project including the Proposed Project’s trip generation, trip distribution patterns, and project trip assignment.

Project Trip Generation
Per the City’s TIAG, trip generation rates were derived from the SANDAG’s (not so) Brief Guide to Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002). Table 3.1 displays the projected daily, as well as AM and PM peak hour, project trip generation.

Table 3.1 - Project Trip Generation - LTA
Land Use Units Trip
Rate ADT
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
% Trips Split In Out % Trips Split In Out
Multi-Family
(More than 20 DU/acre) 119 DU 6/DU 714 8 58 2:8 12 46 9 65 7:3 46 19 Specialty Retail/Strip
Commercial 4,000 SF 40/KSF 160 3 5 6:4 3 2 9 15 5:5 8 7 Total 874 63 15 48 80 54 26
Source: SANDAG (not so) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002) Notes:

ADT = Average Daily Traffic
DU = Dwelling Unit
SF = Square Feet
KSF = 1,000 SF
As shown in Table 3.1, the Proposed Project is anticipated to generate 874 daily trips, including 63 trips (15-in/48-out) during the AM peak hour and 80 (54-in/26-out) trips during the PM peak hour.

Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
The project trip distribution was manually developed based on the geographical location of the Project, as well as the characteristics of the proposed and surrounding land uses. Additional considerations were taken for the N. Pacific Street & W. Mission Road which allows for only rightin/right-out movements for the south leg. Figure 3.1 displays the regional trip distribution for each land use component of the Proposed Project. Based upon the project trip distribution patterns, daily and AM/PM peak hour project trips were assigned to the adjacent roadway network. Figure 3.2 displays the Proposed Project’s trip assignment.

C R

3.1 3.2
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
W Mission Rd Descanso Ave
De Leone Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
N Las Posas Rd
N Pacific St
Hollencrest Rd
Avenida Azul
Pawnee St
S Pacific St
Capalina Rd
Concha Ln
N Las Flores Dr
Rancho Santa Fe Rd Hollenbeck Rd
Calle Capistrano
Palomarcos Ave
Avenida Aguila
Descanso Ave
N Pacific St
8 7
6 3
9 5
4 2
1 10
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 3.1
Project Trip Distribution
Commercial Land Use
·}78
²
Project
Site
XX% Trip Distribution !# Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
45%
5%
45%
30%
5%
10%100%

22.5%

22.5%

27.5%
0 362.5 725 Feet
5%
5%
C R
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
W Mission Rd Descanso Ave
De Leone Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
N Las Posas Rd
N Pacific St
Hollencrest Rd
Avenida Azul
Pawnee St
S Pacific St
Capalina Rd
Concha Ln
N Las Flores Dr
Rancho Santa Fe Rd Hollenbeck Rd
Calle Capistrano
Palomarcos Ave
Avenida Aguila
Descanso Ave
N Pacific St
8 7
6 3
9 5
4 2
1 10
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
Fiugre 3.1
Project Trip Distribution
Residential Land Use
·}78
²
Project
Site
XX% Trip Distribution !# Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
40%
10%
50%
10%
20%
20%100%
20%
20%
30%
0 362.5 725 Feet
C R
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
W Mission Rd Descanso Ave
De Leone Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
N Las Posas Rd
N Pacific St
Hollencrest Rd
Avenida Azul
Pawnee St
S Pacific St
Capalina Rd
Concha Ln
N Las Flores Dr
Rancho Santa Fe Rd Hollenbeck Rd
Calle Capistrano
Palomarcos Ave
Avenida Aguila
Descanso Ave
N Pacific St
8 7
6 3
9 5
4 2
1 10
Capalina Development
Local Transporation Analysis
Figure 3.2
Project Trip Assignment
Commercial Land Use
·}78
²
Project
Site
72 8
72 48
4 8
160
36 36
44 0 365 730 Feet
8 8
XXX Trip Assignment !# Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
4 8
60 C R
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !

 



 

 



 





Legend
N Pacific St & Capalina Rd
N Pacific St (E) & W Mission Rd
Project Drwy #1 & Capalina Rd Project Drwy #2 & Capalina Rd N Pacific St (W) & W Mission Rd
N Las Posas Road and Descanso Ave
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & W Mission Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & Capalina Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 WB Ramps
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 EB Ramps
0 / 1
1 / 2
1 / 4
2 / 4
1 / 3
1 / 2
0 / 1
1 / 3
1 / 4
1 / 2
1 / 4
1 / 4
1 / 3 1 / 2
1 / 3
1 / 2
1 / 2
1 / 4
1 / 4
1 / 4
1 / 21 / 2
1 / 3
1 / 3
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 Capalina Development
Local Transporation Analysis
Figure 3.2
Project Trip Assignment
Commercial Land Use
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first
!

AM / PM
  

NNOT TO SCALE
X
No Trips Added from
Proposed Project
C R
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
W Mission Rd Descanso Ave
De Leone Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
N Las Posas Rd
N Pacific St
Hollencrest Rd
Avenida Azul
Pawnee St
S Pacific St
Capalina Rd
Concha Ln
N Las Flores Dr
Rancho Santa Fe Rd Hollenbeck Rd
Calle Capistrano
Palomarcos Ave
Avenida Aguila
Descanso Ave
N Pacific St
8 7
6 3
9 5
4 2
1 10
Capalina Development
Local Transporation Analysis
Figure 3.2
Project Trip Assignment
Residential Land Use
·}78
²
Project
Site
286
72 358
72 71
71 714
143
143
215
0 365 730 Feet
0 0
XXX Trip Assignment !# Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
71 71
214
C R
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !


  



 

  





 




Legend
N Pacific St & Capalina Rd
N Pacific St (E) & W Mission Rd
Project Drwy #1 & Capalina Rd Project Drwy #2 & Capalina Rd N Pacific St (W) & W Mission Rd
N Las Posas Road and Descanso Ave
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & W Mission Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & Capalina Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 WB Ramps
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 EB Ramps
9 / 4
5 / 2
2 / 9
1 / 5
5 / 18 23 / 9
14 / 6
6 / 23
4 / 14
18 / 8
1 / 5
9 / 4
18 / 8
14 / 6
2 / 9
14 / 6
5 / 18
6 / 23
9 / 4
6 / 23
9 / 4
5 / 2
6 / 23
5 / 18
14 / 6
9 / 4
5 / 2
6 / 23
18 / 8
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 Capalina Development
Local Transporation Analysis
Figure 3.2
Project Trip Assignment
Residential Land Use
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first
!

AM / PM
  

NNOT TO SCALE
X
No Trips Added from
Proposed Project
C R
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
W Mission Rd
Descanso Ave
De Leone Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
N Las Posas Rd
N Pacific St
Hollencrest Rd
Avenida Azul
Pawnee St
S Pacific St
Capalina Rd
Concha Ln
N Las Flores Dr
Rancho Santa Fe Rd
Hollenbeck Rd
Calle Capistrano
Palomarcos Ave
Avenida Aguila
Descanso Ave
N Pacific St
8 7
6 3
9 5
4 2
1 10
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 3.2
Project Trip Assignment
Residential + Commercial Land Use
·}78
²
Project
Site
358
80 430
120
75 79
874
179
179
259
0 365 730 Feet
8 8
XXX Trip Assignment
!# Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
75 79
274
C R
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !


  



 

  





 




Legend
N Pacific St & Capalina Rd
N Pacific St (E) & W Mission Rd
Project Drwy #1 & Capalina Rd Project Drwy #2 & Capalina Rd N Pacific St (W) & W Mission Rd
N Las Posas Rd and Descanso Ave
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & W Mission Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & Capalina Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 WB Ramps
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 EB Ramps 9 / 4 6 / 4 9 / 5
2 / 9 5 / 2
1 / 5 2 / 7 15 / 9
15 / 8 10 / 6
2 / 10
6 / 22 8 / 27 5 / 17
7 / 27
24 / 12
19 / 11
6 / 22
5 / 2
19 / 11
6 / 22
7 / 2715 / 8
10 / 6
7 / 2715 / 8 10 / 6 7 / 27 19 / 11
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 Capalina Development
Local Transporation Analysis
Figure 3.2
Project Trip Assignment
Residential + Commercial Land Use
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first
!

AM / PM
  

NNOT TO SCALE
X
No Trips Added from
Proposed Project
~ - - - - -
I
- - ~ -
I
- - -
C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

Project Study Area
Based on the criteria previously outlined in Chapter 2.4, the project trip assignment shown in Figure

3.2, and preliminary project scoping with City of San Marcos, the following nine (9) roadway segments and ten (10) intersections were included for analysis:

Roadway Segments
 N. Rancho Santa Fe Road, between W. Mission Road and Capalina Road  N. Rancho Santa Fe Road, between Capalina Road and SR-78 Westbound Ramps  N. Rancho Santa Fe Road, between SR-78 Westbound and SR-78 Eastbound Ramps  N. Rancho Santa Fe Road, between SR-78 Eastbound Ramps and Descanso Avenue  N. Pacific Street, between W. Mission Road and Capalina Road  N. Pacific Street, between Capalina Road and Descanso Avenue  W. Mission Road, between N. Rancho Santa Fe Road and N. Pacific Street  Capalina Road, between N. Rancho Santa Fe Road and N. Pacific Street  Descanso Avenue, between N. Pacific Street and N. Las Posas Road

Intersections

1. N. Rancho Santa Fe Road & W. Mission Road (Signal)

2. N. Pacific Street (west) & W. Mission Road (Signal)

3. N. Pacific Street (east) & W. Mission Road (Signal)

4. N. Rancho Santa Fe Road & Capalina Road (Signal)

5. N. Pacific Street & Capalina Road (Side-Street Stop-Controlled)

6. N. Rancho Santa Fe Road & SR-78 Westbound Ramps (Signal)

7. N. Rancho Santa Fe Road & SR-78 Eastbound Ramps (Signal)

8. N. Las Posas Road & Descanso Avenue (Signal)

9. Project Driveway #1 & Capalina Road (Side-Street Stop-Controlled)

10. Project Driveway #2 & Capalina Road (Side-Street Stop-Controlled)

Figure 3.3 displays the overall project study area.

C R

3.3 !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
W Mission Rd Descanso Ave
De Leone Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
N Las Posas Rd
N Pacific St
Hollencrest Rd
Avenida Azul
Pawnee St
S Pacific St
Capalina Rd
Concha Ln
N Las Flores Dr
Rancho Santa Fe Rd Hollenbeck Rd
Calle Capistrano
Palomarcos Ave
Avenida Aguila
Descanso Ave
N Pacific St
8 7
6 3
9 5
4 2
1 10
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 3.3
Project Study Area
·}78
²
Project
Site
0 362.5 725 Feet
!# Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

4.0 Existing Conditions
This chapter provides a qualitative description of the transportation facilities located in the Proposed Project study area. An LOS analysis of the existing operations of the local transportation network facilities is also provided for study roadway segments and intersections.

Existing Transportation Network
Access to the Proposed Project from the regional transportation network will be provided via California State Route 78 (SR-78) freeway, N. Rancho Santa Fe Road, W. Mission Road, and Capalina Road. These facilities will either provide a direct connection to Proposed Project, via project driveway, or will provide a critical link between the Proposed Project and the regional transportation network. Table 4.1 summarizes the existing physical characteristics of roadways within the study area, while Figure 4.1 displays the roadway classifications and study intersection geometrics under Existing Conditions.

Active Transportation
This section discusses the project site’s active transportation modes

4.2.1 Transit Access
The project site is within one half mile of the transit lines serviced by North County Transit District (NCTD) described below:
 Bus Route 304 – This bus route is serviced along W. Mission Road in the eastbound/westbound direction within the project study area. This bus route connects the Palomar College Transit Center to the Encinitas Transit Station. Operations starts at 4:53 AM and end at 8:23 PM between Monday and Friday with 30-minute intervals. On Saturdays, operations start at 6:53 AM and end at 9:05 PM with 60-minute intervals. This route does not operate on Sundays.
 Bus Route 305 – This bus route is serviced along W. Mission Road in the eastbound/westbound direction within the project study area. This bus route connects the Vista Transit Center to the Escondido Transit Center. Operations starts at 4:37 AM and end at 11:30 PM between Monday and Friday with 30-minute intervals. On Saturdays and Sundays, operations start at 5:34 AM and end at 11:31 PM with 30-minute intervals.  Bus Route 604 – This route is services along W. Mission Road and N. Rancho Santa Fe Road within the project study area. This bus route connects the Palomar Transit Center to the Encinitas Station. This route only operates during school arrival and dismissal periods Monday through Friday. This route does not operate on the weekend.  SPRINTER – This light rail line runs between Oceanside Transit Center and Escondido Transit Center (eastbound and westbound direction). The nearest stop to the project site is the Palomar College Transit Center. Operations starts at 4:17 AM and end at 9:10 PM between Monday and Sunday with 30-minute intervals.

C R

4.1 4.2
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 4.1 - Existing Transportation Network Characteristics Roadway From To Number of
Lanes
Median Type Sidewalk? Bike lanes? Transit Route Posted
Speed Limit
N. Rancho Santa Fe
Rd W. Mission Rd Capalina Rd 2 NB/2 SB Raised Both Sides Class II 304 604 40 MPH N. Rancho Santa Fe
Rd Capalina Rd SR-78 WB Ramps 2 NB/2 SB Raised Both Sides Class II 304 604 40 MPH N. Rancho Santa Fe
Rd
SR-78 WB
Ramps
SR-78 EB
Ramps 2 NB/2 SB Undivided Both Sides None 304 604 40 MPH N. Rancho Santa Fe
Rd
SR-78 EB
Ramps Descanso Ave 2 NB/2 SB Raised Both Sides Class II 304 604 40 MPH
Pacific St W. Mission Rd Capalina Rd 1 NB/1 SB Striped Both Sides None None None Pacific St Capalina Rd Descanso Ave 1 NB/1 SB CLTL Both Sides None None None W. Mission Rd West of N. Rancho Santa Fe Rd 2 EB/2 WB Raised / CLTL Both Sides Class II 305 45 MPH W. Mission Rd N. Rancho
Santa Fe Rd N. Pacific St 2 EB/2 WB Raised / Undivided
North Side:

Continuous
South Side:

Discontinuous
Partially
Class II
304
305
604
40 MPH
W. Mission Rd East of N. Pacific St 2 EB/2 WB CLTL / Raised North Side:

Discontinuous
South Side: Class I1
Class II
304
305
604
40 MPH
Capalina Rd N. Rancho
Santa Fe Rd N. Pacific St 1 EB/1 WB CLTL
North Side:

Discontinuous
South Side:

Continuous
None None 35 MPH
Descanso Ave N. Pacific St N. Las Posas
Rd 1 EB/1 WB CLTL Both Sides None None None
Source: CR Associates (2023)
Note:
1 Inland Rail Trail
CLTL = Continuous Left-Turn Lane.

C R
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
W Mission Rd
Descanso Ave
De Leone Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
N Las Posas Rd
N Pacific St
Hollencrest Rd
Avenida Azul
Pawnee St
S Pacific St
Capalina Rd
Concha Ln
N Las Flores Dr
Rancho Santa Fe Rd
Hollenbeck Rd
Calle Capistrano
Palomarcos Ave
Avenida Aguila
Descanso Ave
N Pacific St
8 7
6 3
5 4
2 1
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 4.1
Roadway Classification - Existing Conditions
·}78
²
Project
Site 4-Lane
Major Arterial
2-Lane Collector w/ CLTL
4-Lane Major Arterial
2-Lane Collector
(CommercialIndustrial Fronting)
4-Lane Major Arterial
0 365 730 Feet
2-Lane Collector w/ CLTL
2-Lane Collector w/ CLTL
4-Lane
Major Arterial
4-Lane
Major Arterial
#-Ln XX Functional Classification
Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
!#
C R
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
ê³ ê³ ê³ ê³
ê³ ê³ ê³
Legend
N Pacific St & Capalina Rd
N Pacific St (W) & W Mission Rd N Pacific St (E) & W Mission Rd N Las Posas Rd and Descanso Ave
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & W Mission Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & Capalina Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 WB Ramps
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 EB Ramps


                     
  
           
       
   
   
       
  
  
5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
Figure 4.1
Intersection Geometrics - Existing Conditions
Capalina Development
Local Transporation Analysis
Stop Sign
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first

NNOT TO SCALE
#$
Study Intersection
Signalized Intersection
Lane Geometry
!X

ê³
#$
$#
*Functions as a
single intersection
with one controller
(intersections #2 and #3)
*Functions as a
single intersection
with one controller
(intersections #2 and #3)
~ - - - - -
I
- -~ -
I
-
C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

Based on the preliminary review of the Proposed Project’s site plan, the Proposed Project would not conflict with existing or planned transit facilities and would not result in any impacts to transit facilities.

4.2.2 Bicycle
Under Existing conditions, Class II bicycle facilities exist along N. Rancho Santa Fe Road and W.

Mission Road. Additionally, a Class I multi-use path exists along the south side of W. Mission Road east of N. Pacific Street. This Class I multi-use path is identified as the Inland Rail Trail which is a proposed 21-mile facilities that will eventually connect both the City of Oceanside and Escondido while passing through San Marcos, Vista, and unincorporated areas of the San Diego County. The Inland Rail Trail is expected to be fully constructed some time in 2025.

Per the City of San Marcos General Plan, there are no planned bicycle facilities improvements along the project frontage. Based on the preliminary review of the Proposed Project’s site plan, the Proposed Project would not conflict with existing bicycle facilities and would not result in any impacts to bicyclist safety and accessibility.

4.2.3 Pedestrian
Sidewalks are proposed along the project frontage along Capalina Road with direct connection to the proposed sidewalks surrounding the main building. The sidewalk around the main building provides access to the recreational area, dwelling units, fitness center, leasing office, and retail land use component of the Proposed Project. Lastly, sidewalks are proposed along the south and west side of the buildings on the north side of the property connecting directly to existing sidewalk facilities along W. Mission Road.

Based upon review of the project site plan, the following recommendations are provided:
 Curb ramps at the project driveways are recommended to be reconstructed, if needed, with detectable surface warning tactiles (yellow truncated domes) as well as meeting all ADA requirements
With implementation of the recommendation listed above, the overall pedestrian environment should be enhanced for both walkability and safety and would not result in any impacts to pedestrian facilities.

Existing Intersection Volumes
The study area intersections and roadway traffic counts were conducted on Tuesday, September 27, 2022, and March 9, 2023, by Counts Unlimited, Inc. Figure 4.2 displays both existing daily traffic volumes for study area roadway segments and the AM/PM peak hour turning movements for the study intersections. Traffic count worksheets are provided in Appendix C.

C R

4.3 !
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
W Mission Rd
Descanso Ave
De Leone Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
N Las Posas Rd
N Pacific St
Hollencrest Rd
Avenida Azul
Pawnee St
S Pacific St
Capalina Rd
Concha Ln
N Las Flores Dr
Rancho Santa Fe Rd
Hollenbeck Rd
Calle Capistrano
Palomarcos Ave
Avenida Aguila
Descanso Ave
N Pacific St
8 7
6 3
9 5
4 2
1 10
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 4.2
Traffic Volumes - Existing Conditions
·}78
²
Project
Site 18,803
4,262
16,378
1,219
13,279
0 365 730 Feet
2,837
3,626
XX,XXX Daily Traffic Volumes
Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
26,785
!#
35,911
C R
! ! ! !
! ! ! !

  
 
  
  
  
  

  
 
 
 

  

 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Legend
N Pacific St & Capalina Rd
N Pacific St (W) & W Mission Rd N Pacific St (E) & W Mission Rd N Las Posas Road and Descanso Ave
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & W Mission Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & Capalina Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 WB Ramps
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 EB Ramps
4 / 3
3 / 3
0 / 20 / 1
4 / 4
0 / 0
2 / 3
5 / 2
8 / 20
0 / 24
10 / 14
12 / 18
17 / 27
18 / 29
18 / 49
19 / 36
20 / 39
22 / 36
26 / 25
28 / 31
42 / 70
48 / 27
49 / 38
95 / 86
69 / 55
12 / 21
12 / 23
19 / 25
27 / 46
33 / 72
39 / 3570 / 35
60 / 94
98 / 71 111 / 95
161 / 213
169 / 183
175 / 203
191 / 200
218 / 366
100 / 634
117 / 112
228 / 102
140 / 244
229 / 130
333 / 731
335 / 420
152 / 179 528 / 652 140 / 399 648 / 432
572 / 319
456 / 358
353 / 556460 / 482
475 / 565
502 / 702
526 / 212
418 / 702628 / 977141 / 251
399 / 354 1172 / 956
765 / 1441
561 / 1,086
490 / 1,120
0 / 2
5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
Capalina Development
Local Transporation Analysis
Figure 4.2
Traffic Volumes - Existing Conditions
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first
!

AM / PM
  

NNOT TO SCALE
X
C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

Existing Traffic Conditions
LOS analyses under Existing Conditions were conducted using the methodologies described in Chapter 2. Roadway segment and intersection LOS analysis results are discussed below.

4.4.1 Roadway Segment Analysis
Table 4.2 displays roadway segments and LOS analysis results for study roadway segments under Existing conditions.

Table 4.2 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Existing Conditions Roadway Segment Function
Classification
Daily
Volume
LOS
Threshold
(LOS E)

V/C LOS
N. Rancho Santa Fe Road W. Mission Road to
Capalina Road
4-Lane
Major Arterial 13,279 40,000 0.332 A
N. Rancho Santa Fe Road Capalina Road to SR-78
WB Ramps
4-Lane
Major Arterial 18,803 40,000 0.470 B
N. Rancho Santa Fe Road SR-78 WB to SR-78 EB
Ramps
4-Lane
Major Arterial 26,785 40,000 0.670 C
N. Rancho Santa Fe Road SR-78 EB Ramps to
Descanso Avenue
4-Lane
Major Arterial 35,911 40,000 0.898 E
N. Pacific Street W. Mission Road to
Capalina Road
2-Lane Collector
(commercial
fronting)
1,219 8,000 0.152 A
N. Pacific Street Capalina Road to
Descanso Avenue
2-Lane Collector
with CLTL 2,837 15,000 0.189 A
W. Mission Road N. Rancho Santa Fe
Road to N. Pacific Street
4-Lane
Major Arterial 16,378 40,000 0.409 B
Capalina Road N. Rancho Santa Fe
Road to N. Pacific Street
2-Lane Collector
with CLTL 4,262 15,000 0.284 A
Descanso Avenue N. Pacific Street to N.

Las Posas Road
2-Lane Collector
with CLTL 3,626 15,000 0.242 A
Source: CR Associates (2023)
Notes:

V/C = Volume/Capacity
CLTL = Continuous Left-Turn Lane.

Bold letter indicates substandard LOS
As shown in Table 4.2, all study roadway segments currently operate at acceptable LOS C or better under Existing Conditions with exception to the following roadway segment:
 N. Rancho Santa Fe Road, between SR-78 Eastbound Ramps and Descanso Avenue (LOS E)

4.4.2 Intersection Analysis
Table 4.3 displays intersection LOS and average vehicle delay results for the key study area intersections under Existing Conditions. LOS calculation worksheets for Existing Conditions are provided in Appendix D.

C R

4.4 Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 4.3 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Existing Conditions # Intersection Control
Type
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Avg. Delay
(sec.) LOS
Avg. Delay
(sec.) LOS
1 N. Rancho Santa Fe & W. Mission Rd Signal 12.8 B 13.8 B 2 N. Pacific St (west) & W. Mission Rd Signal1 7.0 A 7.9 A 3 N. Pacific St (east) & W. Mission Rd Signal1 11.1 B 8.6 A 4 N. Rancho Santa Fe & Capalina Rd Signal 25.7 C 41.6 D 5 N. Pacific St & Capalina Rd SSSC 10.9 B 12.0 B
6 N. Rancho Santa Fe & SR-78 WB Ramps Signal 44.4 D 33.8 C 7 N. Rancho Santa Fe & SR-78 EB Ramps Signal 22.7 C 21.4 C 8 N. Las Posas Rd & Descanso Ave Signal 21.4 C 21.1 C
Source: CR Associates (2023)
Notes:

SSSC = Side-Street Stop Controlled. For SSSC intersections, the delay shown is the worst delay experienced by any of the movements.
1Intersections function as a single intersection with one controller.

As shown in Table 4.3, all study area intersections currently operate at acceptable LOS D or better under Existing Conditions.

C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

5.0 Near-Term Year 2025 Conditions
This section provides an analysis of Near-Term Year 2025 Base traffic conditions both with and without the Proposed Project. The scenarios analyzed in this section include:
 Near-Term Year 2025 Base
 Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project
Cumulative Project Traffic
Given the close proximity of the Proposed Project to the Gran Vista Multi-Family project, the same cumulative projects (year 2024) utilized in the Gran Vista Multi-Family Transportation Impact Analysis, September 2022, as well as Gran Vista Multi-Family, were included for the analysis of the Proposed Project. Additionally, per City of San Marcos staff, the Pacific Specific Plan project, Mariposa Phase 2 project, and the Santa Fe Flores Apartments project were also included.

The following twelve (12) projects were identified as cumulative projects, since they are anticipated to contribute traffic within the project study area by the Proposed Project’s opening year:

1. Pacific Commercial – This project is located at the northeast corner of the Grand Avenue and N. Pacific Street intersection. This project proposes to construct a 122-room hotel.

2. San Marcos Highlands – This project is located at the north end of N. Las Posas Road. This project proposes to construct 187 single-family residential dwelling units as well as a 21.68- acre passive park.

3. El Dorado II Specific Plan – This project is located at the southwest corner of the Richmar Avenue and Pleasant Way intersection. This project proposes to construct 72 multi-family dwelling units as well as 2,000 square feet of specialty retail.

4. Villa Serena – This project is located at the northwest corner of the Richmar Avenue and Marcos Street intersection. This project proposes to construct 148 multi-family dwelling units.

5. Mariposa (Phase I) – This project is located at the northwest corner of the Richmar Avenue and Los Olivos Drive intersection. This project proposes to demolish 40 multi-family dwelling units and construct 100 multi-family dwelling units.

6. Mariposa (Phase II) – This project is located at the northeast corner of the Richmar Avenue and Los Olivos Drive intersection. This project proposes to demolish 30 multi-family dwelling units and construct 96 multi-family dwelling units.

7. Murai Subdivision – This project is located at the north end of N. Las Posas Road. This project proposes to construct 89 single-family residential dwelling units.

8. Pacifica San Marcos – This project is located at the southeast corner of the Rancho Santa Fe Road and 9th Street intersection. This project proposes to construct 31 multi-family dwelling units as well as 4,375 square feet of commercial use.

9. Karl Strauss Brewery – This project is located at the southeast corner of the N. Las Posas Road and Armorlite Drive intersection. This project proposes to construct 10,528 square feet of uses that include a tasting room, commercial kitchen, and entertainment room.

C R

5.1 Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

10. Gran Vista Multi-Family – This project is located approximately 250 feet northwest of the W.

Mission Road and N. Las Posas Road intersection. This project proposes to develop 120 multi-family dwelling units.

11. Pacific Specific Plan – This project is located at the northwest corner of N. Las Posas Road and Linda Vista Drive. This project proposes to develop 449 multi-family dwelling units.

12. Sante Fe Flores Apartments – This project is located at the northwest corner of N. Las Flores Drive and S. Santa Fe Avenue. This project proposes to develop 50 multi-family dwelling units.

The traffic generated from the project listed above was included in the Near-Term Year 2025 Base scenario. Figure 5.1 displays the location of the cumulative projects identified above.

C R
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 5.1
Cumulative Projects Location
N Las Posas Rd
W Mission Rd
N Pacific St
Project
Site
² 0 1,000 2,000 Feet
·}78
Karl Strauss
Brewery Pacific Commercial
Pacific San Marcos
Mariposa
(Phase 1 & Phase 2)
Villa Serena
El Dorado II
Specific Plan
Murai Subdivision
San Marcos Highlands
S Pacific St
S Rancho Santa Fe Rd
N Las Posas Rd
Richmar Ave
Topa naga Dr
Borden Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
!( Cumulative Projects Location
Gran Vista
Multi-Family
Pacific Specific
Plan
Santa Fe Flores
Apartments
Las Flores Dr
Linda Vista Dr
C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

Cumulative Project Trip Generation
Table 5.1 displays the projected trip generation for the cumulative projects described above.

Cumulative project traffic was assigned to the project study area as identified within their respective traffic studies provided by the City of San Marcos. Trip generation for cumulative projects traffic without completed traffic studies were developed and assigned to the project study area utilizing the same methodology used for the Proposed project described in Chapter 3.0, consistent with the City’s TIAG. Relevant excerpts from the source of information regarding the cumulative project are provided in Appendix E.

Table 5.1 - Cumulative Project Trip Generation
Cumulative Project Land Use Daily
Trips
AM Peak Hour
(In/Out)
PM Peak Hour
(In/Out)
Pacific Commercial1 Hotel 854 69
(28-in/41-out)
77 (46-in/31-out)
San Marcos
Highlands2
Single Family
Residential/Passive Park 1,998 165(52-in/113-out)
199
(137-in/62-out)
El Dorado II Specific
Plan1
Multi-Family
Residential/Specialty Retail 512 38(9-in/29-out)
47 (31-in/16-out)
Villa Serena1 Multi-Family Residential 1,184 95
(19-in/76-out)
119
(83-in/36-out)
Mariposa
(Phase 1)1 Multi-Family Residential 600
48 (10-in/38-out)
54 (38-in/16-out)
Mariposa
(Phase 2)1 Multi-Family Residential 576 47(9-in/38-out) 52 (36-in/16-out)
Murai Subdivision3 Single Family Residential 890 71
(21-in/50-out)
89 (62-in/27-out)
Pacifica San Marcos1 Multi-Family
Residential/Specialty Retail 361 21(7-in/14-out)
33 (20-in/13-out)
Karl Strauss Brewery1 Brewery/Restaurant 1,685 135
(68-in/67-out)
135
(81-in/54-out)
Gran Vista
Multi-Family4 Multi-Family Residential 960 77(15-in/62-out) 96 (67-in/29-out)
Pacific Specific Plan Multi-Family Residential 2,694 216 (43-in/173-out)
243
(170-in/73-out)
Santa Fe Flores
Apartments Multi-Family Residential 300 24(5-in/19-out) 27 (19-in/8-out)
Cumulative Total 12,614
1,006
(286-in/
720-out)
1,171
(790-in/
381-out)
Source: SANDAG (not so) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002 Notes:
1 Trip generation for cumulative projects traffic without completed traffic studies were developed and assigned to the project study area utilizing the same methodology used for the Proposed project described in Chapter 3.0, consistent with the City’s TIAG. See Appendix E for trip distribution assumptions per cumulative project.
2 Trip generation obtained from the San Marcos Highlands Traffic Impact Analysis Report prepared by RBF Consulting (February 2015) 3 Trip generation, distribution, and assignment obtained from the Murai Subdivision Traffic Impact Analysis Report prepared by STC Traffic Inc (April 2017)
4 Trip generation, distribution, and assignment obtained from the Gran Vista Multi-Family Local Transportation Analysis prepared by CR Associates (February 2023)
As shown, the cumulative projects are anticipated to generate 12,614 daily trips, including 1,006 trips during the AM peak hour and 1,171 trips during the PM peak hour that will be dispersed throughout the San Marcos community and beyond the Proposed Project’s study area. Figure 5.2 displays the cumulative project trip assignment.

C R

5.2 !
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
W Mission Rd
Descanso Ave
De Leone Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
N Las Posas Rd
N Pacific St
Hollencrest Rd
Avenida Azul
Pawnee St
S Pacific St
Capalina Rd
Concha Ln
N Las Flores Dr
Rancho Santa Fe Rd
Hollenbeck Rd
Calle Capistrano
Palomarcos Ave
Avenida Aguila
Descanso Ave
N Pacific St
8 7
6 3
9 5
4 2
1 10
Capalina Development
Local Transporation Analysis
Figure 5.2
Cumulative Project Trip Assignment
·}78
²
Project
Site
637
0 1,100
0 637
0 365 730 Feet
0 0
XXX Trip Assignment
Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
634
!#
631
C R
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !

 
 

 

 



 

 

 



No Trips Added from
Cumulative Projects
No Trips Added from
Cumulative Projects
No Trips Added from
Cumulative Projects
Legend
N Pacific St & Capalina Rd
N Pacific St (E) & W Mission Rd
Project Drwy #1 & Capalina Rd Project Drwy #2 & Capalina Rd N Las Posas Rd & Descanso Ave
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & W Mission Rd N Pacific St (W) & W Mission Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & Capalina Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 WB Ramps
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 EB Ramps
6 / 2
1 / 4
2 / 6
4 / 2
3 / 3
4 / 12
11 / 6
33 / 24
32 / 19
29 / 66
29 / 22
26 / 16
57 / 46
59 / 40
11 / 2915 / 41
13 / 24
14 / 38
18 / 37
19 / 1532 / 47
37 / 22
58 / 69
79 / 176
152 / 100
29 / 66
1 / 4
59 / 40
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 Capalina Development
Local Transporation Analysis
Figure 5.2
Cumulative Project Trip Assignment
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first
!

AM / PM
  

NNOT TO SCALE
X
C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

Near-Term Year 2025 Base Roadway Network and
Traffic Volumes
Study area roadway and intersection geometrics under Near-Term Base conditions were assumed to be identical to the existing roadway geometrics, as shown in Figure 4.1. The Near-Term Base scenario traffic volumes were derived by adding the additional trips generated by the cumulative projects listed in Section 5.1 (Figure 5.2) to the existing traffic volumes (Figure 4.2). Figure 5.3 displays the average daily roadway and peak hour intersection volumes for the study roadway segments and intersections under the Near-Term Base conditions.

Near-Term Year 2025 Base Traffic Conditions
LOS analyses under Near-Term Year 2025 Base Conditions were conducted using the methodologies described in Chapter 2. Roadway segment and intersection LOS analysis results are discussed below.

5.4.1 Roadway Segment Analysis
Table 5.2 displays roadway segments and LOS analysis results for study roadway segments under Near-Term Year 2025 Base conditions.

Table 5.2 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Near-Term Year 2025 Base Conditions Roadway Segment Function
Classification
Daily
Volume
LOS Threshold
(LOS E)

V/C LOS
N. Rancho Santa Fe Road W. Mission Road to
Capalina Road
4-Lane
Major Arterial 13,920 40,000 0.348 A
N. Rancho Santa Fe Road Capalina Road to
SR-78 WB Ramps
4-Lane
Major Arterial 19,440 40,000 0.486 B
N. Rancho Santa Fe Road SR-78 WB Ramps to
SR-78 EB Ramps
4-Lane
Major Arterial 27,420 40,000 0.686 C
N. Rancho Santa Fe Road SR-78 EB Ramps to
Descanso Avenue
4-Lane
Major Arterial 36,550 40,000 0.914 E
N. Pacific Street W. Mission Road to
Capalina Road
2-Lane Collector
(commercial
fronting)
1,220 8,000 0.153 A
N. Pacific Street Capalina Road to
Descanso Avenue
2-Lane Collector
with CLTL 2,840 15,000 0.189 A
W. Mission Road
N. Rancho Santa Fe
Road to N. Pacific
Street
4-Lane
Major Arterial 17,480 40,000 0.437 B
Capalina Road
N. Rancho Santa Fe
Road to N. Pacific
Street
2-Lane Collector
with CLTL 4,270 15,000 0.285 A
Descanso Avenue N. Pacific Street to
N. Las Posas Road
2-Lane Collector
with CLTL 3,630 15,000 0.242 A
Source: CR Associates (2023)
Notes:

V/C = Volume/Capacity
CLTL = Continuous Left-Turn Lane.

Bold letter indicates substandard LOS
As shown in Table 5.2, all study roadway segments are projected to operate at acceptable LOS C under Near-Term Year 2025 Base conditions with exception to the following roadway segment:
 N. Rancho Santa Fe Road, between SR-78 Eastbound Ramps and Descanso Avenue (LOS E) C R

5.3 5.4
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
W Mission Rd
Descanso Ave
De Leone Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
N Las Posas Rd
N Pacific St
Hollencrest Rd
Avenida Azul
Pawnee St
S Pacific St
Capalina Rd
Concha Ln
N Las Flores Dr
Rancho Santa Fe Rd
Hollenbeck Rd
Calle Capistrano
Palomarcos Ave
Avenida Aguila
Descanso Ave
N Pacific St
8 7
6 3
9 5
4 2
1 10
Capalina Development
Local Transporation Analysis
Figure 5.3
Traffic Volumes - Near-Term Year 2025 Base Conditions
·}78
²
Project
Site 19,440
4,270
17,480
1,220
13,920
0 365 730 Feet
2,840
3,630
XX,XXX Daily Traffic Volumes
Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
27,420
!#
36,550
C R
! ! ! !
! ! ! !

  
 
  
  
  
  

  
 
 
 

  

 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Legend
N Pacific St & Capalina Rd
N Pacific St (E) & W Mission Rd
N Las Posas Rd & Descanso Ave
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & W Mission Rd N Pacific St (W) & W Mission Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & Capalina Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 WB Ramps
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 EB Ramps
4 / 3
3 / 3
0 / 20 / 1
4 / 4
0 / 0
2 / 3
5 / 2
8 / 20
0 / 24
10 / 14
12 / 18
17 / 27
18 / 29
18 / 49
19 / 36
20 / 39
22 / 36
26 / 25
28 / 31
42 / 70
48 / 27
49 / 38
95 / 86
12 / 23
19 / 2512 / 21
27 / 46
33 / 72
39 / 35
60 / 94
70 / 35
69 / 55
98 / 71 111 / 95 680 / 451
117 / 112
197 / 202
226 / 229
229 / 130
142 / 250
151 / 428
232 / 104
162 / 217
587 / 692
348 / 772
368 / 444
573 / 323
175 / 203
469 / 382
178 / 195
222 / 378
463 / 485
436 / 376
432 / 740
520 / 739
534 / 605
372 / 571
267 / 218
199 / 320
590 / 1,152
1,030 / 656
519 / 1,186
660 / 1,024844 / 1,617
1,324 / 1,056
0 / 2
5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
Capalina Development
Local Transporation Analysis
Figure 5.3
Traffic Volumes - Near-Term Year 2025 Base Conditions
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first
!

AM / PM
  

NNOT TO SCALE
X
C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

5.4.2 Intersection Analysis
Table 5.3 displays intersection LOS and average vehicle delay results for the key study area intersections under Near-Term Year 2025 Base Conditions. LOS calculation worksheets for NearTerm Year 2025 Base Conditions are provided in Appendix F.

Table 5.3 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Near-Term Year 2025 Base Conditions # Intersection Control
Type
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Avg. Delay
(sec.) LOS
Avg. Delay
(sec.) LOS
1 N. Rancho Santa Fe & W. Mission Rd Signal 12.9 B 14.3 B 2 N. Pacific St (west) & W. Mission Rd Signal1 7.4 A 8.0 A 3 N. Pacific St (east) & W. Mission Rd Signal1 11.3 B 8.7 A 4 N. Rancho Santa Fe & Capalina Rd Signal 25.7 C 42.3 D 5 N. Pacific St & Capalina Rd SSSC 10.9 B 11.0 B
6 N. Rancho Santa Fe & SR-78 WB Ramps Signal 45.3 D 33.7 C 7 N. Rancho Santa Fe & SR-78 EB Ramps Signal 25.6 C 24.5 C 8 N. Las Posas Rd & Descanso Ave Signal 22.6 C 22.7 C
Source: CR Associates (2023)
Notes:

SSSC = Side-Street Stop Controlled. For SSSC intersections, the delay shown is the worst delay experienced by any of the movements.
1Intersections function as a single intersection with one controller.

As shown in Table 5.3, all study area intersections are projected to operate at acceptable LOS D or better under Near-Term Year 2025 Base conditions.

Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project Roadway
Network and Traffic Volumes
Study area roadways and intersection geometrics under the Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project conditions were assumed to be identical to the Near-Term Year 2025 Base conditions geometrics, with exception to the following project features:
 Construction of two full-access project driveways, one at each end of the project site, along Capalina Road which will operate as two-way stop-controlled intersections.

Peak hour intersection volumes for the Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project conditions were derived by combining the Proposed Project trips (as previously shown in Figure 3.2) to the Near-Term Year 2025 Base traffic volumes (as previously shown in Figure 5.3). Peak hour intersection volumes for this scenario are displayed in Figure 5.4.

C R

5.5 !
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
W Mission Rd
Descanso Ave
De Leone Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
N Las Posas Rd
N Pacific St
Hollencrest Rd
Avenida Azul
Pawnee St
S Pacific St
Capalina Rd
Concha Ln
N Las Flores Dr
Rancho Santa Fe Rd
Hollenbeck Rd
Calle Capistrano
Palomarcos Ave
Avenida Aguila
Descanso Ave
N Pacific St
8 7
6 3
9 5
4 2
1 10
Capalina Development
Local Transporation Analysis
Figure 5.4
Traffic Volumes - Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project Conditions ·}78
²
Project
Site 19,870
5,144
17,659
1,399
14,179
0 365 730 Feet
2,848
3,638
XX,XXX Daily Traffic Volumes
Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
27,694
!#
36,670
C R
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !

  
 
  
    

  
   
 

  
 
     

  

 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Legend
N Pacific St & Capalina Rd
N Pacific St (E) & W Mission Rd
Project Drwy #1 & Capalina Rd Project Drwy #2 & Capalina Rd N Las Posas Rd & Descanso Ave
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & W Mission Rd N Pacific St (W) & W Mission Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & Capalina Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 WB Ramps
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 EB Ramps
3 / 3
4 / 4
0 / 20 / 1
4 / 3
2 / 3
0 / 0
5 / 2
8 / 20
0 / 24
15 / 810 / 6
7 / 27
10 / 14
12 / 18
33 / 33
17 / 27
18 / 29
18 / 49
61 / 81
19 / 36
20 / 39
49 / 38
22 / 36
48 / 27 26 / 25
12 / 23
39 / 35
27 / 46
20 / 48
52 / 83
60 / 94
19 / 25
69 / 55
70 / 35
98 / 71 111 / 95
119 / 98
104 / 122 89 / 114
124 / 139
144 / 259
469 / 382
151 / 428
152 / 156
164 / 227
175 / 203
184 / 217
206 / 206695 / 460
226 / 229
227 / 380
229 / 130
241 / 109
593 / 714
348 / 772
368 / 444
573 / 323
149 / 177
437 / 757463 / 485
436 / 376
520 / 739
540 / 627
372 / 571
268 / 223
199 / 320
590 / 1,152
1,036 / 660
538 / 1,197
662 / 1,031844 / 1,617
1,324 / 1,056
15 / 810 / 6
0 / 2
7 / 27
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 Capalina Development
Local Transporation Analysis
Figure 5.4
Traffic Volumes - Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project Conditions Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first
!

AM / PM
  

NNOT TO SCALE
X
C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project Traffic
Conditions
LOS analyses under Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project conditions were conducted using the methodologies described in Chapter 2. Roadway segment and intersection LOS analysis results are discussed below.

5.6.1 Roadway Segment Analysis
Table 5.4 displays roadway segments and LOS analysis results for study roadway segments under Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project conditions.

Table 5.4 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project Conditions Roadway Segment Function
Classification
Daily
Volume
LOS
Threshold
(LOS E)

V/C LOS
LOS
w/o
Project
ΔV/C I?
N. Rancho
Santa Fe Road
W. Mission Road to
Capalina Road
4-Lane
Major Arterial 14,179 40,000 0.354 A A 0.006 N
N. Rancho
Santa Fe Road
Capalina Road to SR-78
WB Ramps
4-Lane
Major Arterial 19,870 40,000 0.497 B B 0.011 N
N. Rancho
Santa Fe Road
SR-78 WB Ramps to SR78 EB Ramps 4-Lane
Major Arterial 27,694 40,000 0.692 C C 0.006 N
N. Rancho
Santa Fe Road
SR-78 EB Ramps to
Descanso Avenue
4-Lane
Major Arterial 36,670 40,000 0.917 E E 0.003 N
N. Pacific Street W. Mission Road to
Capalina Road
2-Lane
Collector
(commercial
fronting)
1,399 8,000 0.175 A A 0.022 N
N. Pacific Street Capalina Road to
Descanso Avenue
2-Lane
Collector with
CLTL
2,848 15,000 0.190 A A 0.001 N
W. Mission
Road
N. Rancho Santa Fe Road
to N. Pacific Street
4-Lane Major
Arterial 17,659 40,000 0.441 B B 0.004 N
Capalina Road N. Rancho Santa Fe Road
to N. Pacific Street
2-Lane
Collector with
CLTL
5,144 15,000 0.343 B A 0.058 N
Descanso
Avenue
N. Pacific Street to N. Las
Posas Road
2-Lane
Collector with
CLTL
3,638 15,000 0.243 A A 0.001 N
Source: CR Associates (2023)
Notes:

V/C = Volume/Capacity
CLTL = Continuous Left-Turn Lane.

I? = Improvement Required?
Bold letter indicates substandard LOS
C R

5.6 Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

As shown in Table 5.4, all study roadway segments are projected to operate at acceptable LOS C or better under Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project conditions with exception to the following roadway segment:
 N. Rancho Santa Fe Road, between SR-78 Eastbound Ramps and Descanso Avenue (LOS E).

The trips associated with the Proposed Project would increase the volume/capacity ratio by

0.003, which does not surpass the 0.02 threshold for roadway segments operating at LOS E or F. Based upon the criteria outlined in Section 2.5, the study roadway segment listed above would not require improvements as a result of the Proposed Project.

5.6.2 Intersection Analysis
Table 5.5 displays intersection LOS and average vehicle delay results for the key study area intersections under Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project Conditions. LOS calculation worksheets for Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project conditions are provided in Appendix G.

As shown in Table 5.5, all study area intersections are projected to operate at acceptable LOS D or better under Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project conditions. Therefore, no study intersections are anticipated to degrade in LOS to unacceptable levels with implementation of the Proposed Project and no improvements will be required.

C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 5.5 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project Conditions # Intersection Control
Type
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay w/o Project
(AM / PM)
LOS w/o Project
(AM / PM)
∆ in Delay
(AM / PM) Avg. Delay I?
(sec.) LOS
Avg. Delay
(sec.) LOS
1 N. Rancho Santa Fe & W. Mission Rd Signal 12.9 B 14.6 B 12.9 / 14.3 B / B 0.0 / 0.3 N 2 N. Pacific St (west) & W. Mission Rd Signal1 7.8 A 8.1 A 7.4 / 8.0 A / A 0.4 / 0.1 N 3 N. Pacific St (east) & W. Mission Rd Signal1 11.0 B 8.8 A 11.3 / 8.7 B / A -0.3 / 0.1 N 4 N. Rancho Santa Fe & Capalina Rd Signal 29.0 C 49.6 D 25.7 / 42.3 C / D 3.3 / 7.3 N 5 N. Pacific St & Capalina Rd SSSC 10.9 B 11.0 B 10.9 / 11.0 B / B 0.0 / 0.0 N 6 N. Rancho Santa Fe & SR-78 WB Ramps Signal 45.2 D 33.7 C 45.3 / 33.7 D / C -0.1 / 0.0 N 7 N. Rancho Santa Fe & SR-78 EB Ramps Signal 25.9 C 24.8 C 25.6 / 24.5 C / C 0.3 / 0.3 N 8 N. Las Posas Rd & Descanso Ave Signal 22.6 C 22.7 C 22.6 / 22.7 C / C 0.0 / 0.0 N 9 Project Drwy #1 & Capalina Rd SSSC 9.5 A 9.9 A DNE DNE 9.5 / 9.9 N 10 Project Drwy #2 & Capalina Rd SSSC 9.4 A 9.8 A DNE DNE 9.4 / 9.8 N Source: CR Associates (2023)
Notes:

SSSC = Side-Street Stop Controlled. For SSSC intersections, the delay shown is the worst delay experienced by any of the movements.

I? = Improvement Required?
DNE = Does Not Exist
1Intersections function as a single intersection with one controller.

C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

6.0 Horizon Year 2050 Conditions
This section provides an analysis of Horizon Year 2050 traffic conditions both with and without the Proposed Project. The scenarios analyzed in this section include:
 Horizon Year 2050
 Horizon Year 2050 with Project
Horizon Year 2050 Roadway Network and Traffic
Volumes
Study area roadway and intersection geometrics under Horizon Year 2050 Conditions were assumed to be identical to the Existing Conditions, as previously shown in Figure 4.1.

Horizon Year 2050 ADT forecasts were obtained from the SANDAG Series 14 ABM2+/2021 RP forecast year 2050 model (scenario ID#459). Any study roadway with Near-Term Year 2025 Base ADT found to be greater than forecasted TFIC ADT were adjusted using growth rates observed between existing and forecasted TFIC ADT for adjacent segments.

Intersection turning movement volumes were developed utilizing the roadway volumes analyzed for the roadway segment analysis. Growth was applied per approach based on existing and forecasted Horizon Year 2040 ADT, distributed based on existing travel patterns, and balanced utilizing engineering judgement.

Details on counts collected from TFIC and growth rates applied are provided in Appendix H. Roadway ADT and intersection peak hour volumes for this scenario are displayed in Figure 6.1.

C R

6.1 !
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
W Mission Rd
Descanso Ave
De Leone Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
N Las Posas Rd
N Pacific St
Hollencrest Rd
Avenida Azul
Pawnee St
S Pacific St
Capalina Rd
Concha Ln
N Las Flores Dr
Rancho Santa Fe Rd
Hollenbeck Rd
Calle Capistrano
Palomarcos Ave
Avenida Aguila
Descanso Ave
N Pacific St
8 7
6 3
9 5
4 2
1 10
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 6.1
Traffic Volumes - Horizon Year 2050 Conditions
·}78
²
Project
Site 22,400
4,300
24,400
2,000
16,800
0 365 730 Feet
5,100
3,700
XX,XXX Daily Traffic Volumes
Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
30,400
!#
37,400
C R
! ! ! !
! ! ! !

  
 
  
  
  
  

  
 
 
 

  

 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Legend
N Pacific St & Capalina Rd
N Pacific St (W) & W Mission Rd N Pacific St (E) & W Mission Rd N Las Posas Rd and Descanso Ave
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & W Mission Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & Capalina Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 WB Ramps
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 EB Ramps
0 / 0 10 / 10 10 / 3020 / 20
20 / 30 20 / 40
20 / 80
30 / 30 90 / 50
40 / 70
30 / 50
30 / 70
40 / 40 40 / 60 30 / 40 50 / 50 60 / 60 80 / 50
40 / 80 80 / 130
110 / 90
110 / 70
110 / 80 70 / 110 100 / 70
220 / 210
210 / 280
200 / 290 190 / 470 200 / 220 140 / 160
120 / 110 220 / 240480 / 400
240 / 140
240 / 230 270 / 430 700 / 480 290 / 130
660 / 760 400 / 840
440 / 550
660 / 340 480 / 810 500 / 510 220 / 420
610 / 710 460 / 420 390 / 620
660 / 840
330 / 320 670 / 1140
780 / 1,3001,070 / 690
740 / 1,240 860 / 1,660 1,350 / 1,080
10 / 10
10 / 10 10 / 10 10 / 10
10 / 10 10 / 10 40 / 60
10 / 10 30 / 50 50 / 50
5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
Capalina Development
Local Transporation Analysis
Figure 6.1
Traffic Volumes - Horizon Year 2050 Conditions
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first
!

AM / PM
  

NNOT TO SCALE
X
~ - - - - -
I
- -~ -
I
-
C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

Horizon Year 2050 Traffic Conditions
LOS analyses under Horizon Year 2050 Conditions were conducted using the methodologies described in Chapter 2. Study roadway segment and intersection LOS analysis results are discussed below.

6.2.1 Roadway Segment Analysis
Table 6.1 displays roadway segments and LOS analysis results for study roadway segments under Horizon Year 2050 conditions.

Table 6.1 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 Conditions Roadway Segment Function
Classification
Daily
Volume
LOS
Threshold
(LOS E)

V/C LOS
N. Rancho Santa Fe Road W. Mission Road to
Capalina Road
4-Lane
Major Arterial 16,800 40,000 0.420 B
N. Rancho Santa Fe Road Capalina Road to SR-78
WB Ramps
4-Lane
Major Arterial 22,400 40,000 0.560 C
N. Rancho Santa Fe Road SR-78 WB Ramps to SR78 EB Ramps 4-Lane
Major Arterial 30,400 40,000 0.760 D
N. Rancho Santa Fe Road SR-78 EB Ramps to
Descanso Ave
4-Lane
Major Arterial 37,400 40,000 0.935 E
N. Pacific Street W. Mission Road to
Capalina Road
2-Lane Collector
(commercial
fronting)
2,000 8,000 0.250 A
N. Pacific Street Capalina Road to
Descanso Ave
2-Lane Collector
with CLTL 5,100 15,000 0.340 B
W. Mission Road N. Rancho Santa Fe Road
to N. Pacific Street
4-Lane
Major Arterial 24,400 40,000 0.610 C
Capalina Road N. Rancho Santa Fe Road
to N. Pacific Street
2-Lane Collector
with CLTL 4,300 15,000 0.287 A
Descanso Avenue N. Pacific Street to N. Las
Posas Road
2-Lane Collector
with CLTL 3,700 15,000 0.247 A
Source: CR Associates (2023)
Notes:

V/C = Volume/Capacity
CLTL = Continuous Left-Turn Lane.

Bold letter indicates substandard LOS
As shown in Table 6.1, all study roadway segments are projected to operate at acceptable LOS C or better under Horizon Year 2050 conditions with exception to the following roadway segment:
 N. Rancho Santa Fe Road, between SR-78 Eastbound Ramps and Descanso Avenue (LOS E) C R

6.2 Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

6.2.2 Intersection Analysis
Table 6.2 displays intersection LOS and average vehicle delay results for the key study area intersections under Horizon Year 2050 Conditions. LOS calculation worksheets for Horizon Year 2050 Conditions are provided in Appendix I.

Table 6.2 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 Conditions # Intersection Control
Type
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Avg. Delay
(sec.) LOS
Avg. Delay
(sec.) LOS
1 N. Rancho Santa Fe & W. Mission Rd Signal 13.7 B 15.5 B 2 N. Pacific St (west) & W. Mission Rd Signal1 8.7 A 11.0 B 3 N. Pacific St (east) & W. Mission Rd Signal1 11.0 B 11.9 B 4 N. Rancho Santa Fe & Capalina Rd Signal 27.9 C 39.7 D 5 N. Pacific St & Capalina Rd SSSC 11.7 B 13.1 B
6 N. Rancho Santa Fe & SR-78 WB Ramps Signal 50.2 D 35.5 D 7 N. Rancho Santa Fe & SR-78 EB Ramps Signal 27.4 C 24.1 C 8 N. Las Posas Rd & Descanso Ave Signal 24.7 C 27.8 C
Source: CR Associates (2023)
Notes:

SSSC = Side-Street Stop Controlled. For SSSC intersections, the delay shown is the worst delay experienced by any of the movements.
1Intersections function as a single intersection with one controller.

As shown in Table 6.2, all study area intersections are projected to operate at acceptable LOS D or better under Horizon Year 2050 Conditions.

Horizon Year 2050 with Project Roadway Network and
Traffic Volumes
Study area roadway and intersection geometrics under the Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions were assumed to be identical to the Horizon Year 2050 Conditions geometrics, with exception to the following project features:
 Construction of two full-access project driveways, one at each end of the project site, along Capalina Road which will operate as two-way stop-controlled intersections.

Peak hour intersection volumes for the Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions were derived by combining the Proposed Project trips (as previously shown in Figure 3.2) to the Horizon Year 2050 traffic volumes (as previously shown in Figure 6.1). Peak hour intersection volumes for this scenario are displayed in Figure 6.2.

C R

6.3 !
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
W Mission Rd
Descanso Ave
De Leone Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
N Las Posas Rd
N Pacific St
Hollencrest Rd
Avenida Azul
Pawnee St
S Pacific St
Capalina Rd
Concha Ln
N Las Flores Dr
Rancho Santa Fe Rd
Hollenbeck Rd
Calle Capistrano
Palomarcos Ave
Avenida Aguila
Descanso Ave
N Pacific St
8 7
6 3
9 5
4 2
1 10
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
Figure 6.2
Traffic Volumes - Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions ·}78
²
Project
Site 22,830
5,174
24,579
2,179
17,059
0 365 730 Feet
5,108
3,708
XX,XXX Daily Traffic Volumes
Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
30,674
!#
37,520
C R
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !

  
 
  
    

  
    
 

  
 
  
 
 

  

 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Legend
N Pacific St & Capalina Rd
N Pacific St (E) & W Mission Rd
Project Drwy #1 & Capalina Rd Project Drwy #2 & Capalina Rd N Pacific St (W) & W Mission Rd
N Las Posas Rd and Descanso Ave
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & W Mission Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & Capalina Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 WB Ramps
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 EB Ramps
0 / 015 / 8 10 / 6
7 / 27 10 / 10 10 / 30
20 / 20
20 / 30 20 / 40
20 / 80
30 / 30 90 / 50
45 / 42
30 / 50
30 / 70 40 / 60
40 / 70 30 / 40 58 / 77
59 / 91
60 / 60 50 / 50 80 / 50 99 / 141 110 / 70
110 / 80 70 / 110 100 / 70 190 / 470 200 / 220
190 / 206
480 / 400 147 / 187
135 / 148
134 / 102
120 / 140
120 / 110
202 / 299
212 / 290 715 / 489
226 / 232 229 / 244
240 / 140
240 / 230 275 / 432 299 / 135
666 / 782
660 / 340 400 / 840
440 / 550
187 / 227 460 / 420 485 / 827 500 / 510
616 / 732 390 / 620
660 / 840
331 / 325 220 / 420
799 / 1,3111,076 / 694
740 / 1,240 672 / 1,147 860 / 1,660 1,350 / 1,080 40 / 60 10 / 10 10 / 10
10 / 10
0 / 0
10 / 10
7 / 2715 / 8 10 / 10 10 / 10
0 / 0 10 / 6
10 / 10
30 / 50
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 Capalina Development
Local Transporation Analysis
Figure 6.2
Traffic Volumes - Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first
!

AM / PM
  

NNOT TO SCALE
X
~ - - - - -
I
- - ~ -
I
- - -
C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

Horizon Year 2050 with Project Traffic Conditions
LOS analyses under Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions were conducted using the methodologies described in Chapter 2. Study roadway segment and intersection LOS analysis results are discussed below.

6.4.1 Roadway Segment Analysis
Table 6.3 displays roadway segments and LOS analysis results for study roadway segments under Horizon Year 2050 with Project conditions.

Table 6.3 - Roadway Segment LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions Roadway Segment Function
Classification
Daily
Volume
LOS
Threshold
(LOS E)

V/C LOS
LOS
w/o
Project
ΔV/C I?
N. Rancho Santa
Fe Road
W. Mission Road to
Capalina Road
4-Lane
Major Arterial 17,059 40,000 0.426 B B 0.006 N
N. Rancho Santa
Fe Road
Capalina Road to
SR-78 WB Ramps
4-Lane
Major Arterial 22,830 40,000 0.571 C C 0.011 N
N. Rancho Santa
Fe Road
SR-78 WB Ramps to
SR-78 EB Ramps
4-Lane
Major Arterial 30,674 40,000 0.767 D D 0.007 N
N. Rancho Santa
Fe Road
SR-78 EB Ramps to
Descanso Avenue
4-Lane
Major Arterial 37,520 40,000 0.938 E E 0.003 N
N. Pacific Street W. Mission Road to
Capalina Road
2-Lane Collector
(commercial
fronting)
2,179 8,000 0.272 A A 0.022 N
N. Pacific Street Capalina Road to
Descanso Avenue
2-Lane Collector
with CLTL 5,108 15,000 0.341 B B 0.001 N
W. Mission Road N. Rancho Santa Fe
Road to N. Pacific Street
4-Lane
Major Arterial 24,579 40,000 0.614 C C 0.004 N
Capalina Road N. Rancho Santa Fe
Road to N. Pacific Street
2-Lane Collector
with CLTL 5,174 15,000 0.345 B A 0.058 N
Descanso
Avenue
N. Pacific Street to N.

Las Posas Road
2-Lane Collector
with CLTL 3,708 15,000 0.247 A A 0.001 N
Source: CR Associates (2023)
Notes:

V/C = Volume/Capacity
CLTL = Continuous Left-Turn Lane.

I? = Improvement Required?
As shown in Table 6.3, all study roadway segments are projected to operate at acceptable LOS D or better under Horizon Year 2050 with Project conditions with exception to the following roadway segment:
 N. Rancho Santa Fe Road, between SR-78 Eastbound Ramps and Descanso Avenue (LOS E).

The trips associated with the Proposed Project would increase the volume/capacity ratio by

0.003, which does not surpass the 0.02 threshold for roadway segments operating at LOS E or F. Based upon the criteria outlined in Section 2.5, the study roadway segment listed above would not require improvements as a result of the Proposed Project.

C R

6.4 Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

6.4.2 Intersection Analysis
Table 6.4 displays intersection LOS and average vehicle delay results for the key study area intersections under Horizon Year 2050 with Project conditions. LOS calculation worksheets for Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions are provided in Appendix J.

As shown in Table 6.4 all study area intersections are projected to operate at acceptable LOS D or better under Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions. Therefore, no study intersections are anticipated to degrade in LOS to unacceptable levels with implementation of the Proposed Project and no improvements will be required.

C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 6.4 - Peak Hour Intersection LOS Results – Horizon Year 2050 Base with Project Conditions # Intersection Control
Type
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay w/o Project
(AM / PM)
LOS w/o Project
(AM / PM)
∆ in Delay
(AM / PM) Avg. Delay I?
(sec.) LOS
Avg. Delay
(sec.) LOS
1 N. Rancho Santa Fe & W. Mission Rd Signal 13.9 B 16.0 B 13.7 / 15.5 B / B 0.2 / 0.5 N 2 N. Pacific St (west) & W. Mission Rd Signal1 8.9 A 11.1 B 8.7 / 11.0 A / B 0.2 / 0.1 N 3 N. Pacific St (east) & W. Mission Rd Signal1 10.9 B 12.1 B 11.0 / 11.9 B / B -0.1 / 0.2 N 4 N. Rancho Santa Fe & Capalina Rd Signal 29.8 C 47.7 D 27.9 / 39.7 C / D 1.9 / 8.0 N 5 N. Pacific St & Capalina Rd SSSC 11.9 B 13.3 B 11.7 / 13.1 B / B 0.2 / 0.2 N 6 N. Rancho Santa Fe & SR-78 WB Ramps Signal 50.3 D 35.6 D 50.2 / 35.5 D / D 0.1 / 0.1 N 7 N. Rancho Santa Fe & SR-78 EB Ramps Signal 28.6 C 24.6 C 27.4 / 24.1 C / C 1.2 / 0.5 N 8 N. Las Posas Rd & Descanso Ave Signal 24.7 C 27.8 C 24.7 / 27.8 C / C 0.0 / 0.0 N 9 Project Drwy #1 & Capalina Rd SSSC 9.9 A 10.3 B DNE DNE 9.9 / 10.3 N 10 Project Drwy #2 & Capalina Rd SSSC 9.8 A 10.1 B DNE DNE 9.8 / 10.1 N Source: CR Associates (2023)
Notes:

SSSC = Side-Street Stop Controlled. For SSSC intersections, the delay shown is the worst delay experienced by any of the movements.

I? = Improvement Required?
DNE = Does Not Exist
1Intersections function as a single intersection with one controller.

C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

7.0 LOS Deficiencies and Improvement
Requirements
This chapter provides improvements requirements needed to increase LOS to acceptable or preproject conditions for any roadway segments or intersections found to operate unacceptably with implementation of the Proposed Project.

Determination of the Need for Off-Site Improvements to
Accommodate Project Traffic – Near-Term Year 2025 with
Project Conditions
This section identifies required improvements for any study roadway segments or intersections that are associated with the Proposed Project under Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project conditions.

Roadway Segment Analysis
No improvements required.

Intersection Analysis
No improvements required.

Determination of the Need for Off-Site Improvements to
Accommodate Project Traffic – Horizon Year 2050 with
Project Conditions
This section identifies required improvements for any study roadway segments or intersections that are associated with the Proposed Project under Horizon Year 2050 with Project conditions.

Roadway Segment Analysis
No improvements required.

Intersection Analysis
No improvements required.

C R

7.1 7.2
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

8.0 Site Access & Circulation
This chapter addresses access to the project site and discusses the functionality of the project’s internal circulation.

Driveway Access
The Proposed Project will be located approximately 450 feet east of the N. Rancho Santa Fe Road and Capalina Road intersection in the City of San Marcos. The project site is currently vacant and is bordered by W. Mission Road on the north, Capalina to the south, abandoned/vacant development to the west, and commercial retail land uses to the east.

Project site access will be provided via two new project driveways, one at each end of the project site, along Capalina Road. A brief description of each of the two driveways is provided below:
 Project Driveway #1 is located at the western end of the project site along Capalina Road and will function with full access. This driveway serves as one of two entry points and provides access points to the project site from the west. This driveway is projected to operate at LOS B or better under all study scenarios.
 Project Driveway #2 is located at the eastern end of the project site along Capalina Road and will function with full access. This driveway serves as one of two entry points and provides access points to the project site from the east. This driveway is projected to operate at LOS B or better under all study scenarios.

Additionally, the project proposes to re-stripe Capalina Road along the project frontage with a center left-turn lane.

After further review of the project site plan, the following recommendations are provided:
 Driveways are recommended to be constructed in accordance with City standards  Stop sign (R1-1) to be installed at both project driveways Queuing Analysis
A 95th percentile queue analysis was conducted to determine the extent of queueing at the project driveways as well as movements at intersections where project contributes twenty (20) or more vehicle trips. The queue analysis was conducted under Near-Term Year 2025 Base with Project conditions and Horizon Year 2050 with Project conditions. Table 8.1 displays the 95th percentile queue analysis results under both analysis scenarios. Intersection queueing reports are provided in Appendix K.

C R

8.1 8.2
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

Table 8.1 - Queuing Analysis at Project Driveways
# Intersection Control
Type
Turning
Movement
Peak
Hour
Available
Storage (ft)
Near-Term Year 2025
with Project Conditions
Horizon Year 2050
with Project Conditions
95th Percentile
Queue (ft)1
Excess
Queue (ft)
95th Percentile
Queue (ft)1
Excess
Queue (ft)
1 N. Rancho Santa Fe &
W. Mission Rd Signal
NBL AM 180 100 0 125 0
PM 150 0 175 0
EBR AM 160 75 0 100 0
PM 75 0 125 0
WBL AM 310 225 0 250 0
PM 250 0 275 0
4 N. Rancho Santa Fe &
Capalina Rd Signal
SBL AM 195 50 0 75 0
PM 75 0 125 0
WBL AM 100 200 100 225 125
PM 175 75 125 25
9 Project Drwy #1 &
Capalina Rd SSSC SBLR AM 230 25 0 25 0PM 25 0 25 0
10 Project Drwy #1 &
Capalina Rd SSSC SBLR AM 140 25 0 25 0PM 25 0 25 0
Source: CR Associates (2023)
Notes:
1 Queues are rounded to the nearest 25 feet to represent one vehicle length.

SSSC = Side-Street Stop Controlled.

Bold indicates excess queue extending past existing available storage C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

As shown, the 95th percentile queues for turning movements are projected to fit within the available storage with exception to the following turn movement:

N. Rancho Santa Fe & Capalina Road
 Westbound Left-Turn (AM Peak Hour) – At most, 125 feet of 95th percentile queue would exceed storage length under Horizon Year 2050 with Project Conditions. Extending this turn pocket would be feasible and would require re-striping.

Internal Circulation
Internal roadways on the project site allows for two-way flow of vehicle traffic. One dead-end aisle is proposed at the northwest corner of the project site. Resident parking is also provided through the project site.

Based upon review of the project site plan, the following recommendations are provided:
 Appropriate signage to warn drivers of pedestrian foot traffic Sight Distance Analysis
An intersection sight distance analysis was conducted for both Proposed Project Driveways along Capalina Road. The City of San Marcos Intersection Sight Distance Guidelines, December 2, 2020, were utilized to evaluate intersection sight distances at the project driveways. The following two types of sight distances were evaluated:
 Stopping Sight Distance - The distance traveled in the time it takes a driver to recognize an object ahead, decide to stop, and then stop their vehicle.  Corner Sight Distance - The distance a driver stopped on the minor road can see approaching vehicles on the major road before their line of sight is blocked by an obstruction near the intersection
Table 8.2 displays the minimum intersection sight distances for the two types of sight distances listed above.

Table 8.2 - Minimum Intersection Sight Distances
Design Speed (mph)

Intersection Sight Distance (ft)
Stopping Corner
(Left)
Corner
(Right)
20 125 220 190
25 150 275 240
30 200 330 285
35 250 385 335
40 300 440 380
45 360 495 430
50 430 550 480
Source: Intersection Sight Distance Guidelines, City of San Marcos, December 2, 2020 C R

8.3 8.4
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

Roadway design speed is used to determine the minimum sight distance requirements. As documented in Table 4.1, the posted speed limit is 35 MPH. As a conservative approach, 40 MPH was selected for the sight distance analysis.

A sight distance study was completed by Excel Engineering on April 4, 2023, to determine the required and field measured intersection sight distances for the project driveways. The sight distance study is provided in Appendix L.

Table 8.3 displays the measured sight distance, the design speed, as well as the minimum intersection sight distance requirements.

Table 8.3 - Measured Sight Distances
Driveway Type Direction of
Oncoming Traffic
Design Speed
(MPH)
Minimum
ISD (ft)
Measured
ISD (ft)
Pass or
Fail
Project
Driveway
#1
Stopping Southbound 40 300 478 Pass
Corner (Left) Westbound 40 440 780 Pass
Corner (Right) Eastbound 40 380 478 Pass
Project
Driveway
#2
Stopping Southbound 40 300 728 Pass
Corner (Left) Westbound 40 440 530 Pass
Corner (Right) Eastbound 40 380 728 Pass
Source: Excel Engineering, (April 2023)
As shown in Table 8.3, both Proposed Project driveways would meet the intersection sight distance requirements.

C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis

9.0 Parking
Parking will be provided throughout the Proposed Project via surface lot. The parking stalls are provided along both sides of the two-way travel way within the lot fronting the residential dwelling units and the recreation area. Per the project site plan, a total of 147 parking spaces will be provided.

Based upon review of the project site plan, the following recommendations are provided:
 The project must provide an adequate number of accessible parking spaces as required per the California Building Code
C R
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
Appendix A - Memorandum of Approach –
Capalina Development Project
C R
Capalina Development
Jonathan D. Rilling, Manager, Capalina SMA, LLC
179 Calle Magdalena #201, Encinitas, CA 92024 Attn: Jon Rilling 760-445-5144 [email protected]
445' east of N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & Capalina Rd intersection 2191153300
Capalina Road
Business /
Industrial District
Mixed-Use 3 (nonresidential)
Vacant and
Undeveloped
147 TBD
The project applicant is requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA22-20003), Rezone (R22- 0003), and a Site Development Plan (SDP22-0007). If approved, these entitlements would allow for the development of 119 apartment units and 1,850 square feet (s.f.) of commercial use. Of the 119 apartment units, 18 are affordable units. Although the project’s current site plan proposes 1,850 square feet of commercial-retail land uses, for a conservative analysis and to allow flexibility for potential minor land use changes, the analysis documented herein assumed a total of 4,000 square feet of commercial-retail instead. The assumed opening year of the Proposed Project is 2025.

The Proposed Project is located on a 2.5-acre vacant infill parcel at North Rancho Santa Fe & Capalina Road, in the City of San Marcos. The site is surrounded by commercial, residential uses, and a Christian church, located along a light-rail transit line (SPRINTER). The existing zoning is MU-3 (Mixed Use Commercial - No Residential) with a maximum height of 4-stories/54 feet.

SAN MARCOS

DISCOVER LIFE'S POSS IBILITIES
PROJECT INFORMATION FOR TRAFFIC ANALYSES FORM TIA-1
This form is required with the initial submittal package of any traffic-generating entitlement project.

Please contact [email protected] and/or the assigned staff with questions.

PROJECT INFORMATION
Pro·ect Name:
ero·ect A licant
Name:

Address:

Nearest Cross Streets:

Community Plan Area:

Land Use
Project Description (witli
Vehicles Accessible Bicycles Motorcycles
Attachment A- Project Vicinity Map
Attachment B- Project Site Plan that clearly identifies the following:
• Land use types and quantities
• Number of parking spaces provided (vehicle, ADA, bicycle, motorcycle). • Driveway locations and type (full access, partial access, right in/out only). • Pedestrian and bicycle access; on-site pedestrian circulation • Location/distance of closest existing transit stop, and proposed transit stops identified in RTIP (measured as walking distance to project entrance/or middle of parcel).

Attachment C-Transportation Demand Management (TOM}- Identify any TOM project features/measures (see Section 2.1.4 of TIA Guidelines) (i.e. transit pass subsidies, unbundled parking, shuttle services, car share, bicycle supportive features such as repair stations, lockers, etcetera). Identify all transportation amenities.

Attachment C may not be re uired with the initial entitlement submittal at the discretion of assi ned staff.

SAN MARCOS

DISCOVER LIFE'S POSSIBILITIES

PRELIMINARY SCREENING INFORMATION
CEQA Transportation Analysis Screening
Refer to Section 2.1.2 of the City Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. Review the exemption criteria below for each land use that applies to the project. The portion of a project that meets all of the exemption criteria in any of the applicable five categories below would be considered to have a less-than-significant VMT impact and may be screened out from requiring a CEQA transportation analysis. a.

C.
d.
e.

Does the Project meet all of the following?
• Floor Area Ratio> 0.75
• No parking beyond minimum required by Municipal Code
• Consistent with current General Plan
• Does not reduce existin affordable housin
Is the Project in a high-quality transit area per TIAG Attachment B? Is the Project a non-retail project? Retail projects, retail portions of a mixed-use project, and projects that are not analyzed using VMT er ca ita or er em lo ee metrics are ineli ible.

Does the Project incorporate similar land use characteristics (uses, density, and mix) to development in the area or census tract? Is the Project located in a low VMT area using the SAN DAG residential and or em lo licable?
D Consistent 121 Inconsistent
D 0
0 D
[L] D
0 D
Is the Project's land use D Generates less than 1,000 daily D Generates less than 500 daily consistent with the trips (unadjusted driveway trips) trips (unadjusted driveway trips) Community Plan zoning? □ Generates less than 100 peak hour □ Generates less than 50 peak hour vehicle trips? vehicle trips?
If a Local Transportation Analysis is required for the Project, provide an exhibit showing the project's trip distribution percentages, project trip assignment, and study area using the process described in Section 3.5 of the TIA Guidelines. Include all intersections and roadways where the Project adds 50 or more peak hour trips.

This component may not be required with the initial entitlement submittal at the discretion of assi ned staff.

Study Scenarios
(Check all Applicable)
121 Existing
Existing w/ Project
121 Opening Year
121 Opening Year w/ Project
121 Horizon Year
121 Horizon Year w/ Project D
fl ------------------------------------
- -
-
-
-
119 DU 6 / DU 714 8% 58 2:8 12 46 9% 65 7:3 46 19
4,000 SF 40 / KSF 160 3% 5 6:4 3 2 9% 15 5:5 8 7
874 - 63 - 15 48 - 80 - 54 26

PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
In addition to the CEQA analysis, a non-CEQA local transportation analysis may be required for land use projects to evaluate the effects of a development project on the circulation network, primarily on local access and circulation in the proximity of a project site. This analysis will address traffic operations, safety issues and needed project design features related to a proposed land use project, as well as site access and internal circulation.

Projected daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour trip generation estimates must be summarized in a table. Trip generation rates, factors, and source should be provided using the format below.

Proposed Land Use(s)
Net Trip Generation
Source: SANDAG's (Not So) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2022) City of San Marcos
Project Information Form
VMT/LTA Attachment Information and Scoping
Consistent with the City of San Marcos Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (COSMTIAG), the project trip generation was developed using SANDAG trip generation rates and the Proposed Project description.

VMT
Based on the COSMTIAG, it is anticipated that the Proposed Project would be screened out from conducting a detailed VMT analysis due to the following:
 Project is Located within a SANDAG Smart Growth Region (Attachment C) - The Proposed Project is located along the Sprinter rail line, less than a mile from the Palomar College Sprinter Station, and next to a bus transit stop.
 A portion of the residential land use are affordable units (20 dwelling units) which are screened out from the VMT analysis.
 Project is in a VMT-Efficient Area – Per SANDAG’s VMT Map (Attachment C) the residential component of the project is located in a VMT-efficient area.  Locally-Serving Retail Project – The 4,000 square foot commercial retail component project is less than 50,000 square feet and expected to draw at least 75% of customers from the local area.

LTA
As discussed in the PIF form, the Proposed Project would generate more than 500 ADT and potentially be required to conduct an LTA. The following assumptions have been developed in the event an LTA is required.

Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
The project trip distribution were developed based on a review of existing travel patterns for the project site’s traffic analysis zone (TAZ) via Replica big data1 hosting services. Per Replica’s big data hosting services, it was determined that the majority of existing trips from the project site’s TAZ travel would travel along Rancho Santa Fe and Las Posas Road to eventually distribute to different points within the city or to get on State Route 78 (SR-78). Existing trip patterns also show vehicle trips along Mission Road to the east and Rancho Santa Fe and Las Posas Road south of the SR-78. Additional considerations were taken for the N. Pacific Street & W. Mission Road which allows for only right-in/right-out movements for the south leg.

Attachment D displays both trip origin (outgoing trips) and trip destination (incoming trips) from the project site’s TAZ for both residential and commercial land uses. Attachment E displays the regional trip distribution for each land use component of the project. Also provided in Attachment D is the project trip assignment for combined land uses.

List of Cumulative Projects
A list of suggested cumulative projects is provided within Attachment F.

Suggested TIS and LTA Outline
A suggested outline for the two separate traffic studies is provided within Attachment G. 1 Big Data – Describes the collection of complex and large data sets that is difficult to capture, process, store, search, and analyze using conventional data base systems.

City of San Marcos
Project Information Form

Attachment Description
The table below provide a summary of each of the attachments.

Attachment Summary
Name Description Attachment
Proposed Project Regional Location Displays the Proposed Project’s regional location. A Proposed Project Site Plan Displays the Proposed Project’s site plan. B SANDAG Smart Growth Region
SANDAG VMT Map – Resident
Displays the Proposed Project’s location on
SANDAG’s SMART Growth Region Map and
SANDAG’s VMT Map for residents.

C
Existing Traffic Patterns – Replica
Big Data
Displays traffic patterns for incoming and outgoing
trips for the Proposed Project’s TAZ. D
Project Trip Distribution and
Assignment
Displays the Proposed Project’s trip distributions and
assignment assumptions. E
List of Cumulative Projects for LTA Suggested list of cumulative project for LTA. F TIS and LTA Study Outline Suggested outline for the TIS and LTA traffic studies. G

City of San Marcos
Project Information Form
Attachment A
Project Location

Capalina Development
Project Information Form
Attachment A
Project Regional Location
Project
Site
N 0 1,600 3,200 Feet
C R
A
r.: "'
~
~
-<J' ''7
Gr.:ind
Pbz.:i
~ <r,
Q
1/)
0 Q.
oJl
Q
_,J
2 W Borden Ra
,so,
Camino 'oe
Q/"?
~
~ ,,~
co"'c\
c.,❖
v
a::
>-
J!
~
~
Q
0 J
~
San Marco
Cal State
Unt, San
M:irco
City of San Marcos
Project Information Form
Attachment B
Project Site Plan

CAPALINA ROAD

W MISSION ROAD

5.0'

40.0'

10.0' 30.0' REC AREA 7,500 SF FITNESS CO-WORK LEASE TRASH

TRASH MAIL
415.7'
257.5' 318.8'
EV2 LIGHTED DIRECTORY MAP PER FIRE DEPT. STANDARDS LIGHTED DIRECTORY MAP PER FIRE DEPT. STANDARDS BUS STOP

35.4'

94.0' R.O.W.

45.4'

48.6'

NCTD ROW

PROPOSED ROW TYPICAL STREET TREE IN FUTURE PARKWAY
A
B
C
EV2
EV3
EV3
EV3
EV3
EV3
EV3
EV3
EV3
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2
EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2 EV2
EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1 EV1
EV1
EV1
EV1

6.0' 24.0' 71.8' 66.9' 37.7' 24.0'

24.0' 24.0' 6.0'

6.0'

5.0' 6.0' 75.2'

73.2' 6.0'

16.0'

2.0'
BUMBER

OVERHANG

TYPICAL PARKING DIMENSIONS (NTS)

18.0'

5.0' WALKWAY STANDARD STALL ACCESSIBLE STALL 8.0' 9.0' 18.0' 9.0' 41.5' 6.5' BIKE LANE 3.5' 11.5' 11.5' 12.0' TURN LANE 12.0' 12.5' 4.0' MEDIAN 7.0' SIDEWALK R.O.W. 32.0' 45.5' EXISTING CONDITION WEST BOUND SIDE AND MEDIAN 45.0' FUTURE BUILDOUT EAST BOUND SIDE 2.0' BUFFER 5.5' BIKE LANE 7.0' SIDEWALK 6.0' PARKWAY MISSION ROAD 94.0' PROPOSED R.O.W

PROPOSED
R.O.W. PROPOSED R.O.W.

NCTD MISSION ROAD41.5' 6.5' BIKE LANE 3.5' 11.5' 11.5' 12.0' TURN LANE 12.0' 12.5' 4.0' MEDIAN 7.0' SIDEWALK R.O.W. 32.0' 2.0' BUFFER 5.5' BIKE LANE7.0' SIDEWALK 6.0' PARKWAY MISSION ROAD 94.0' PROPOSED R.O.W

PROPOSED
R.O.W. MISSION ROAD
NCTD SECTION 'A' 35.0' 3.5' 12.0' 12.5' 19.0' 16.0' 8.0' MEDIAN 7.0' SIDEWALK R.O.W. 32.0' 2.0' BUFFER 5.5' BIKE LANE 7.0' SIDEWALK 8.5' PARKWAY MISSION ROAD 94.0' PROPOSED R.O.W

PROPOSED
R.O.W. MISSION ROAD
NCTD SECTION 'B' 23.0' 3.5' 11.5' 11.5' 11.0' 12.0' 8.0' MEDIAN 7.0' SIDEWALK R.O.W. 30.0' 7.0' BUFFER 7.0' SIDEWALK 22.5' PARKWAY MISSION ROAD 94.0' PROPOSED R.O.W

PROPOSED
R.O.W. MISSION ROAD

NCTD SECTION 'C'

EXISTING
R.O.W.

EXISTING
R.O.W.

EXISTING
R.O.W.

EXISTING
R.O.W. 8.5' 6.0' 6.0' 22.5' 5256 S. Mission Road, Ste 404 Bonsall, CA 92003 760.724.1198 ARCHITECTURE SCALE: MARCH 8, 2023 SAN MARCOS, CA Capalina SMA, LLC 179 Calle Magdalena #201 Encinitas, CA 92024 Attn: Jon Rilling CAPALINA APTS GPA22-0003 PROJECT SUMMARY 4-STORY STACKED FLATS CONSTRUCTION TYPE V-A (1-HOUR) OCCUPANCY R-2 / B SPRINKLERS NFPA 13 ADDRESS CAPALINA ROAD APN 2191153300 EXISTING ZONING MU-3 PROPOSED ZONING MU-2 COMMERCIAL 4,000 SF* TOTAL HOMES 119 APTS GROSS AREA 2.51 AC NET AREA 2.41 AC DENSITY 47.4 DU/AC PARKING 147 SPACES FAR 1.24 UNIT MIX 11 PLAN 1 STUDIO/1BA 600 SF 8 PLAN 2 1BD/1BA 680 SF 45 PLAN 3 1BD/1BA 710 SF 6 PLAN 4 2BD/1BA 925 SF 41 PLAN 5 2BD/2BA 1,080 SF 8 PLAN 6 3BD/2BA 1,130 SF 119 TOTAL UNITS PARKING SUMMARY* RESIDENTIAL (SB 69515 AFFORDABLE DENSITY BONUS) 64 (0&1 BED) X 1 64 SP 55 (2&3 BED) X 1.5 83 SP TOTAL REQUIRED 147 SP TOTAL PROVIDED 147 SP NON-RESIDENTIAL PARKING 4,000 SF / 1,000 SF = 4.0 X 3 12 SP (SB 69515 AFFORDABLE DENSITY BONUS PROVIDED - 0 SP) OPEN SPACE* PRIVATE 7,632 SF INDOOR COMMON 1,250 SF OUTDOOR COMMON 25,700 SF TOTAL 34,582 SF *REFER TO SHEET A-SP2 FOR DETAILED INFORMATION 0 30 60 90 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN N A-SP LEGEND ACCESSIBLE SPACE EV1 EV CAPABLE SPACE EV2 EV READY SPACE EV3 EV CHARGERS ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL RETAINING WALL I I X ---)( I I _
I
I_ I
I I
I
I
r-;
' IT
I :

X
•
•I
I : t-----
I>---
- ' •
~:

I
• •
1:

I
•1 ,,, 7
11 •I
I
' '-...'
I
------tlll
I
-----tt I I
I
------tl11

D D D D D D D D D D
,,, D
7 + -----
-+ '
"-
::-----..
::-----..
:----....
"-.._
'--.
-.......:,
'
-.........~~,-.. ,/
, .....
" - --- - --------- --- ----- ------
I
-
I
\
-------
I D
: D
: D
I D I :
- -------- -
-------
....,
I ---~
-
-
-
-
-
11!:1
-
--------
---
I I I
---------
I

CJ CJ CJ
= =
-
I I I
I I I
r, I~ I ' ' +
H-
-I I- I
I I I
r, r
' I I '
I I -J' + I- I- +
I

I I I I
l --t4- ,-- ,J, ' ' ' '
I 1-H + H + 111
I
------
-
City of San Marcos
Project Information Form
Attachment C
SANDAG SMART Growth Concept Map
SANDAG VMT Map - Residents

Sm:a rtGrowth
Opportunity A1'$.lli
r--:== O:lnlng/Pl■ nned
1 1 Pot.ntlal
- I Metm,pr,lit:'ln ccnw
ra (Jrt:i.-v,o:n,r,,-
EZ1 TuwnCl,i1b_.'f'"
~ o,rt,rr1Und y 0-:nl t"f·
- fillrnlVill~
--5ia.c.llU: .0Q.'fll1,•
::~~; MIIIQ..'(I ,,►. .. ~li,M$l Camdo,
2050 Transit Network'" from
San Diego f orward: The- Regional Plan
- OOASTl:N/AMIH/\K/Heb"olink
- Tmluy/SPRTNTeA:
---= $mTNTEn &1•~
- ~~Tr.:irwt
- St~~r/Shuttle
= ll h rrequency Local Dus
- localSMART GROWTH CONCEPT MAP

NORTH COUNTY SUBREGION
May 20 16
Mi lt$
KllOMITCRS
SANDAG
AD m, t C".1 1.JWth Of.'lll•ILll ly A11:,.r:. :,huwn o n : m.-.p ba,-ie ti,eenldentlfiecland~lor ..;;I~ OIi lh1~ 111,1p hy b;.d j1)($li(:lii}1~
"'Tt=arul 11L-4.wurk !,J'L,-1(.'l'~W hJI e.atog,~IK: j)U!ptP".A5.

NORTH COUNTY SUBREGIONAL MAP
All Smart Growth Opportunity Areas shown on the map have been identified and recomme nde d for inclusion on the map by local juri<J:diction:1.

Project Site
Focused View of Project Site within SM-7 (SANDAG SMART Growth Map) 8/30/22, 5:04 PM San Diego Region SB743 VMT Maps
https://sandag.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=bb8f938b625c40cea14c825835519a2b 1/1 Esri Community Maps Contributors, SanGIS, California State Parks, © OpenStreetMap, Micros 300ft
+ Find address or place 
–
San Diego Region SB743 VMT Maps
TFIC: Transportation Forecast Information Center Metadata Disclaimer Download Mode Choice Report Map Legend / Disclaimer
Map Legend
Current Data
2016 - ABM2+ / 2021 RP (Scenario ID 458)
Regional Mean = 18.9 VMT per Resident
Regional Mean = 18.9 VMT per Employee
2025 - ABM2+ / 2021 RP (Scenario ID 462)
Regional Mean = 17.7 VMT per Resident
Regional Mean = 17.0 VMT per Employee
2035 - ABM2+ / 2021 RP (Scenario ID 475)
Regional Mean = 16.6 VMT per Resident
Regional Mean = 15.3 VMT per Employee
2050 - ABM2+ / 2021 RP (Scenario ID 459)
Regional Mean = 16.0 VMT per Resident
Regional Mean = 14.3 VMT per Employee
Archived Data
2016 - ABM2 / 2019 RTP (Scenario ID 434)
Regional Mean = 19.0 VMT per Resident
Regional Mean = 27.2 VMT per Employee
Disclaimer
The maps provided by SANDAG are an interpretation
of the Senate Bill 743 Technical Advisory guidelines
published by the California Office of Planning and
Research and are provided as a resource to the
jurisdictions in the San Diego region to use as they see fit. Users of the data should exercise their professional judgment in reviewing, evaluating and analyzing VMT
reduction estimate results from the tool. Each agency
should consult with CEQA experts and legal counsel
regarding their own CEQA practices and updates to
local policies. Refer to full disclaimer and additional information relating to the use of the SB 743 VMT Map
Web Application.

While the data have been tested for accuracy and are
properly functioning, SANDAG disclaims any
responsibility for the accuracy or correctness of the data.

THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS EXCLUSIVE AND IN

LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR

PURPOSE AND/OR ANY OTHER TYPE WHETHER
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.

In no event shall SANDAG become liable to users of
these data, or any other party, for any loss or damages, consequential or otherwise, including but not limited to time, money, or goodwill, arising from the use,
operation or modification of the data. In using these
data, users further agree to indemnify, defend, and
hold harmless SANDAG for any and all liability of any
nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of
accuracy or correctness of the data, or the use of the data.

To assist SANDAG in the maintenance of the data, users
should provide SANDAG, at the email address shown
below, information concerning errors or discrepancies
found in using the data.
[email protected]
Filter
Forecast / ABM Version is
Residents/Employees is
Geography is
Year is
San Diego Region SB743 VMT Maps
ABM2+ / 2021 RP
Residents
Census Tract
2016
2016 VMT Per Capita by Census Tract
Geography Census Tract
Name 200.29
Residents/Employees Residents
Persons 7,470
VMT per Capita 12.5
Percent of Mean 66.2%
Zoom to
'"
300ft
Map Legend / Disclaimer
Moi,..l.ogl!lld.

Percent of Mean
- More tt,an 125% of Regional Mean
- 100% to 125% of Regional Mean
85% to 100% a, Regional Mean
SO% to 85% of Regional Mean
J..ess than 50% or Regional Mean
No Data
Not Enough Data
~
2016 -ABM2+ / 2021 RP !Scenario ID 458)
2025 -ABM2+ / 2021 RP (Scenario ID 462)
2035 -ABM2+ / 2021 RP (Scenario ID 475)
2050 -ABM2+ / 2021 RP (Scenario ID 459)
Archived Data 2016 -ABM2 / 2019 RTP (Scenario ID 434)
Disclaimer
City of San Marcos
Project Information Form
Attachment D
Existing Traffic Patterns – Replica Big Data
Trip Origin Travel Patterns – Residential
• = siuny Capa11na sn:iro (1) e
FIIC'l'S ; Ca'-N~~ falW1 Thu .. d, ll1)f\J~ 1 .. D lnpO,g,n 1 .. 0 o Map m o ;itawt 7000 Ulps by 6640 Uip takefs • MIKl!um certainty 0 ~SIi-rift ........ o
l';; NOtwolk l lnkVOIU-
--
DownloaclLty«O.U"
Nun'CffOfllfoslnillMSUllOUQIIHChl'KltwOtklink
-
Trip Destination Travel Patterns – Residential
• = S!udy ~paLin,1 sr.a,q (2) e
F•llofs Ii CalNovFal2021 Thu • 0 Tr1p0eslinalloo 1 • 111 TrlpPl,1pos.o 1 • 0 0 M~ ffiD.1 bMl 2310 tr1psby 1430I1iplakofs • Modiumcertainty(I) SMwSUrnmaMS Map LayOJ$
@ r»ui:NelwOfkl.Jnk\Ull!Mt -.,
-
OownloadL9ytf0.tav
Trip Origin Travel Patterns – Commercial
• = Sludy C.'.lp:i~oa Sh.lfo (Z} e
F11ofs a Co1Novfll2021 Thu.. 111 TrtpP'l:rpoeo 7 .. 0 Tll'°"'in 1 - 0 0 Map iii~bSGt N80 1fipsby 72001flptal«!fs • MOd,umcmtaioty (D ShowSUmrNOrin MapLayors
"' '""" @ Datil:HNWOIICIJnk\ll::lklme V
.......... o
l_l; N9twolk Link 1/oiu_
OownloaduyftO.tav
Trip Destination Travel Patterns – Commercial
• = stud'r' C..palina Shan, (Z) e
Filtors i; C31Nov Fal2021 Thu • ala 1.-,Pu,pon 7 • 0 T~DallnJbi I ~ 0 o Map m oa~so,
Milp Layers
0 0.ta'NelWO!lcUnk\ll:;alme v
L~o.t.10
~ NetwOrkLinkVOlU-
~-
~ot8fNlc5 -
""""' ~i.a,...o.1a1 "'
l -4.7k trlpst>y 1\.51r;trlptak0f'S • MOdlumCOl'talnty (D 5'-SI.Wllfflllriff City of San Marcos
Project Information Form
Attachment E
Proposed Project Trip Distribution and Assignment

!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
W Mission Rd
Descanso Ave
De Leone Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
N Las Posas Rd
N Pacific St
Hollencrest Rd
Avenida Azul
Pawnee St
S Pacific St
Capalina Rd
Concha Ln
N Las Flores Dr
Rancho Santa Fe Rd
Hollenbeck Rd
Calle Capistrano
Palomarcos Ave
Avenida Aguila
Descanso Ave
N Pacific St
8 7
6 3
9 5
4 2
1 10
Capalina Development
Project Information Form
Project Trip Distribution
Commercial Land Use
·}78
²
Project
Site
XX% Trip Distribution
!# Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
45%
5%
45%
30%
5%
10%
100%

22.5%

22.5%

27.5%
0 362.5 725 Feet
5%
5%
C R
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
W Mission Rd Descanso Ave
De Leone Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
N Las Posas Rd
N Pacific St
Hollencrest Rd
Avenida Azul
Pawnee St
S Pacific St
Capalina Rd
Concha Ln
N Las Flores Dr
Rancho Santa Fe Rd Hollenbeck Rd
Calle Capistrano
Palomarcos Ave
Avenida Aguila
Descanso Ave
N Pacific St
8 7
6 3
9 5
4 2
1 10
Capalina Development
Project Information Form
Project Trip Distribution
Residential Land Use
·}78
²
Project
Site
XX% Trip Distribution !# Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
40%
10%
50%
10%
20%
20%100%
20%
20%
30%
0 362.5 725 Feet
C R
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
Concha Ln
8 7
6 3
9 5
4 2
1 10
Capalina Development Project Trip Assignment
Commercial Land Use
·}78
²
Project
Site
36 0 365 730 Feet
XXX Trip Assignment
!# Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
Project Information Form
C R
z
ri
-0
0 "' gi
~
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !

 



 

 



 





Legend
N Pacific St & Capalina Rd
N Pacific St (E) & W Mission Rd
Project Drwy #1 & Capalina Rd Project Drwy #2 & Capalina Rd N Pacific St (W) & W Mission Rd
N Las Posas Road and Descanso Ave
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & W Mission Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & Capalina Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 WB Ramps
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 EB Ramps
0 / 1
1 / 2
1 / 4
2 / 4
1 / 3
1 / 2
0 / 1
1 / 3
1 / 4
1 / 2
1 / 4
1 / 4
1 / 3 1 / 2
1 / 3
1 / 2
1 / 2
1 / 4
1 / 4
1 / 4
1 / 21 / 2
1 / 3
1 / 3
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 Capalina Development
Project Information Form
Project Trip Assignment
Commercial Land Use
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first
!

AM / PM
  

NNOT TO SCALE
X
No Trips Added from
Proposed Project
C R
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
Concha Ln
8 7
6 3
9 5
4 2
1 10
Capalina Development Project Trip Assignment
Residential Land Use
·}78
²
Project
Site
143
0 365 730 Feet
XXX Trip Assignment
!# Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
Project Information Form
C R
z
ri
-0
0 "' gi
~
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !


  



 

  





 




Legend
N Pacific St & Capalina Rd
N Pacific St (E) & W Mission Rd
Project Drwy #1 & Capalina Rd Project Drwy #2 & Capalina Rd N Pacific St (W) & W Mission Rd
N Las Posas Road and Descanso Ave
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & W Mission Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & Capalina Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 WB Ramps
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 EB Ramps
9 / 4
5 / 2
2 / 9
1 / 5
5 / 18 23 / 9
14 / 6
6 / 23
4 / 14
18 / 8
1 / 5
9 / 4
18 / 8
14 / 6
2 / 9
14 / 6
5 / 18
6 / 23
9 / 4
6 / 23
9 / 4
5 / 2
6 / 23
5 / 18
14 / 6
9 / 4
5 / 2
6 / 23
18 / 8
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 Capalina Development
Project Information Form
Project Trip Assignment
Residential Land Use
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first
!

AM / PM
  

NNOT TO SCALE
X
No Trips Added from
Proposed Project
C R
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
W Mission Rd
Descanso Ave
De Leone Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
N Las Posas Rd
N Pacific St
Hollencrest Rd
Avenida Azul
Pawnee St
S Pacific St
Capalina Rd
Concha Ln
N Las Flores Dr
Rancho Santa Fe Rd
Hollenbeck Rd
Calle Capistrano
Palomarcos Ave
Avenida Aguila
Descanso Ave
N Pacific St
8 7
6 3
9 5
4 2
1 10
Capalina Development
Project Information Form
Project Trip Assignment Residential
+ Commercial Land Use
·}78
²
Project
Site
358
80 430
120
75 79
874
179
179
259
0 365 730 Feet
8 8
XXX Trip Assignment
!# Study Intersection
Study Roadway
Project Site
75 79
274
C R
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !


  



 

  





 




Legend
N Pacific St & Capalina Rd
N Pacific St (E) & W Mission Rd
Project Drwy #1 & Capalina Rd Project Drwy #2 & Capalina Rd N Pacific St (W) & W Mission Rd
N Las Posas Rd and Descanso Ave
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & W Mission Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd & Capalina Rd N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 WB Ramps
N Rancho Santa Fe Rd
& SR-78 EB Ramps 9 / 4 6 / 4 9 / 5
2 / 9 5 / 2
1 / 5 2 / 7 15 / 9
15 / 8 10 / 6
2 / 10
6 / 22 8 / 27 5 / 17
7 / 27
24 / 12
19 / 11
6 / 22
5 / 2
19 / 11
6 / 22
7 / 2715 / 8
10 / 6
7 / 2715 / 8 10 / 6 7 / 27 19 / 11
9 5 6 7 8
1 2 3 4
10 Capalina Development
Project Information Form
Project Trip Assignment Residential
+ Commercial Land Use
Study Intersection
Peak Hour Volumes
Turn Movements
*Names of North-South
cross-streets always
listed first
!

AM / PM
  

NNOT TO SCALE
X
No Trips Added from
Proposed Project
~ - - - - -
I
- - ~ -
I
- - -
C R
City of San Marcos
Project Information Form
Attachment F
List of Cumulative Projects for LTA

!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
Capalina Development
Project Information Form
Cumulative Projects Location
N Las Posas Rd
W Mission Rd
N Pacific St
Project
Site
² 0 1,000 2,000 Feet
·}78
Karl Strauss
Brewery Pacific Commercial
Pacific San Marcos
Mariposa
(Phase 1 & Phase 2)
Villa Serena
El Dorado II
Specific Plan
Murai Subdivision
San Marcos Highlands
S Pacific St
S Rancho Santa Fe Rd
N Las Posas Rd
Richmar Ave
Topa naga Dr
Borden Rd
S Santa Fe Ave
!( Cumulative Projects Location
Gran Vista
Multi-Family
Pacific Specific
Plan
Santa Fe Flores
Apartments
Las Flores Dr
Linda Vista Dr
C R
Given the close proximity of the Proposed Project to the Gran Vista Multi-Family project, the same cumulative projects (year 2024) utilized in the Gran Vista Multi-Family Transportation Impact Analysis, September 2022, as well as Gran Vista Multi-Family, were included for the analysis of the Proposed Project. Additionally, per City of San Marcos staff, the Pacific Specific Plan project, Mariposa Phase 2 project, and the Santa Fe Flores Apartments project were also included.

The following twelve (12) projects were identified as cumulative projects, since they are anticipated to contribute traffic within the project study area by the Proposed Project’s opening year:

1. Pacific Commercial – This project is located at the northeast corner of the Grand Avenue and N. Pacific Street intersection. This project proposes to construct a 122-room hotel.

2. San Marcos Highlands – This project is located at the north end of N. Las Posas Road. This project proposes to construct 187 single-family residential dwelling units as well as a 21.68- acre passive park.

3. El Dorado II Specific Plan – This project is located at the southwest corner of the Richmar Avenue and Pleasant Way intersection. This project proposes to construct 72 multi-family dwelling units as well as 2,000 square feet of specialty retail.

4. Villa Serena – This project is located at the northwest corner of the Richmar Avenue and Marcos Street intersection. This project proposes to construct 148 multi-family dwelling units.

5. Mariposa (Phase I) – This project is located at the northeast corner of the Richmar Avenue and Los Olivos Drive intersection. This project proposes to develop 60 multi-family dwelling units.

6. Mariposa (Phase II) – This project is located at the northeast corner of the Richmar Avenue and Los Olivos Drive intersection. This project proposes to develop 66 multi-family dwelling units.

7. Murai Subdivision – This project is located at the north end of N. Las Posas Road. This project proposes to construct 89 single-family residential dwelling units.

8. Pacifica San Marcos – This project is located at the southeast corner of the Rancho Santa Fe Road and 9th Street intersection. This project proposes to construct 31 multi-family dwelling units as well as 4,375 square feet of commercial use.

9. Karl Strauss Brewery – This project is located at the southeast corner of the N. Las Posas Road and Armorlite Drive intersection. This project proposes to construct 10,528 square feet of uses that include a tasting room, commercial kitchen, and entertainment room.

10. Gran Vista Multi-Family – This project is located approximately 250 feet northwest of the W.

Mission Road and N. Las Posas Road intersection. This project proposes to develop 120 multi-family dwelling units.

11. Pacific Specific Plan – This project is located at the northwest corner of N. Las Posas Road and Linda Vista Drive. This project proposes to develop 449 multi-family dwelling units.

12. Sante Fe Flores Apartments – This project is located at the northwest corner of N. Las Flores Drive and S. Santa Fe Avenue. This project proposes to develop 50 multi-family dwelling units.

C R
City of San Marcos
Project Information Form
Attachment G
TIS and LTA Study Outline

Ill SAN MARCOS II D,scom ,,,,., Poss,a,ums

REPORT OUTLINE
The typical Traffic Impact Analysis report will follow the report outline given below. The report will be submitted to the City as a PDF file with a hyperlinked table of contents considering these components:
• Local Transportation Analysis Requirements: Requirements for conducting LOS analysis, site access assessments, and other local transportation analyses for non-CEQA purposes. • CEQA Analysis Requirements: CEQA analysis, which consists of VMT analysis as well as assessing impacts to pedestrians, bicyclists, transit, hazards, emergency access, and other impacts.

Local Transportation Analysis Report

0.0 Executive Summary

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Project Description

1.2 Report Organization

2.0 Local Transportation Analysis Methodology

2.1 General Plan Consistency

2.2 Determination of Project Study Area

3.0 Project Traffic

3.1 Trip Generation

3.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment

3.3 Project Study Area

4.0 Existing Conditions

4.1 Existing Transportation Network

4.2 Existing Traffic Conditions

5.0 Near-Term Year Conditions

5.1 Near-Term Transportation Network and Traffic Volumes

5.2 Near-Term without Project Traffic Conditions

5.3 Near-Term with Project Traffic Conditions

6.0 Horizon Year Conditions

6.1 Horizon Year Transportation Network and Traffic Volumes

6.2 Horizon Year without Project Traffic Conditions

6.3 Horizon Year with Project Traffic Conditions

7.0 LOS Deficiencies and Improvement Requirements
Transportation Impact Analysis/ CEQA VMT Analysis

0.0 Executive Summary

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Project Description

1.2 Report Organization

2.0 CEQA VMT Analysis

2.1 VMT Analysis Methodology

2.2 VMT Analysis Screening

2.3 VMT Analysis

3.0 VMT Impact and Mitigation Measures

4.0 Site Access & Circulation
Capalina Development
Local Transportation Analysis
Appendix B - Signal Timing Sheets
C R

Phase Timing and Options
Unit Information Phase Timing Phase Options
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
X X X . X X X X
. . X X . . . X
. X . . . X . .
. . . . . . . .
. X . . . X . .
. . . . . . . .

Unit Parameters . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. X . . . . X .

Phase Configuration Global Phase Recalls Notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .

City of San Marcos
Rancho Santa Fe @ Mission
Phase
Enable
Non Lock Detector
Min Vehicle Recall
Max Vehicle Recall
Ped Recall
0 0
5 0 0 0 0 5 0
0 0 0 0 24
1 2 4
6 4
2 Phase
1 7
8 Excl Ped
Phase
Min
Max
Ped
Green No Walk
Phase Not On
Phase Not On NB Right
Green No Walk
EB
Phase Not On
Description
EB Uturn
Startup
None
Phase Not On
Added Initial
Maximum Initial
Time B4 Reduction
Cars B4 Reduction
Time To Reduce
Reduce By
Minimum Gap
Advance Walk
Delayed Ped
WB Left
All Red Flash Sns
5 MCE Enable
Free Sequence
Start Yel. Override
Start Red Override
1 WB
NB Left
6 0 0
Disable
Phase Not On
0 0
0 0
Local CVM Fash Disable
3 All Red Flash Exit
Enable

0.0 0.0
0 No Ped Startup Call
Max Green 2
0 0
0 0.0
0 Add Initial Calculation
Ped Clear During Yellow
Ped Clear During Red Clr
Yellow Min Override
0 Red Clear
40 4.0

1.0 0
Max Green 1
Yellow Change 4.0 4.8 3.0

1.0 1.3 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0
Soft Vehicle Recall
Dual Entry
Sim. Gap Disable
0 0 0

0.0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0

0.0 4.5
No Startup Call

2.0 Actuated Rest in Walk
Conditional Svc Enable
Auto Ped Clear
0 Passage
0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0 0
0 0.0
0 0
Man. Control Seq. 1
Startup All Red 6
28 Intelight MAXTIME 2.X
Rancho Santa Fe
Mission
Startup Flash
Controller Number
0 40
Phase 3
Software
Main Street
Side Street
IP Address
Min Green 2 0
Description
EB
Uturn
Walk
Ped Clear
Min Green
Passage 2
Extended Mode
10 2.5
50 4.8

1.3 0.0
0 0 0

4.5 3.0

0.0 2.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8 0
Min Green 2

0.0 0 0

0.0 0 0 Red Rest
0 0 Ped Recycle
5 6 7 8
0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0
0 2.0 0.0 2.0
0 0
8 0
8 10
5 Auto Flash Entry
Auto Flash Exit
Max Green 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Steady Don't Walk 0 0 0
0 2.5 0.0 2.0
NB
Right
0 0
WB NB
Left
WB
Left EB Excl Ped
29 0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
All Dark Flash Sns Disable
0 0 0 0
0 30 50 0 40

2.0 0.0

0.0 Red Revert
Backup Time
Disable
Enable

6.0 600
Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT
~-I I I I I I I I I I

SAN MARCOS

DISCOVER LIFE'S POSSIBILITIES

Sequences
Sequence 1 Sequence 2 Sequence 3 Sequence 4 Sequence 5 Sequence 6 Sequence 7 Sequence 8 Sequence 9 Sequence 10 Sequence 11 Sequence 12 Sequence 13 Sequence 14 Sequence 15 Sequence 16
Standard Overlaps
. . . . .
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
. . . . .
. . . . .
0 0 0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6 Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Off Off Off Off Off
2 3 4 5
Call for Svc
1 Enabled
NB Right
Normal
1,8
0 0.0

0.0 0
0 0.0
.
.
.

Startup Call
Recall
4 4
3 2,1,a,4,3,b
Ring Sequence Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
1 2,1,a,3,4,b
3 4 4
4 3
4 3
4 3
4 3
4 2 6,5,a,8,7,b 2 6,5,a,8,7,b 2 6,5,a,8,7,b
1 1,2,a,4,3,b 1
2 6,5,a,8,7,b
Ring Sequence
1 1,2,a,3,4,b
Trail Red
Walk
Ped Clear
Delay
Overlap
Negative Phs
Negative Ovlp
Negative Ped
Green Suppr
Trail Green
Trail Yellow
Modifier Phs
Type
Included Phs
1 1,2,a,4,3,b
2 6,5,a,7,8,b
3 4
3 2 5,6,a,7,8,b
Ring Sequence
4 2 6,5,a,7,8,b 2 5,6,a,8,7,b
Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
1 2,1,a,3,4,b
2 5,6,a,8,7,b
3 4
Ring Sequence
1 1,2,a,3,b
2 5,6,a,7,8,b
Ring Sequence
1 1,2,a,3,b
2 5,6,a,7,8,b
Overlaps
Enabled
Description
3 4
3 3
4 3
4 3
4 1 1,2,a,3,b 1 2,1,a,3,4,b 1 1,2,a,4,3,b 1 2,1,a,4,3,b Ring Sequence Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
3 Ring Sequence
2 5,6,a,7,8,b 2 5,6,a,7,8,b 2 5,6,a,7,8,b
Ring Sequence Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
2 5,6,a,8,7,b 2 5,6,a,8,7,b
3 1 2,1,a,4,3,b 1 1,2,a,3,4,b 1 1,2,a,4,3,b 1 2,1,a,4,3,b Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT

Backup Prevention / No Serve Phases
Sequence 1 Sequence 2 Sequence 3
Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sequence 4 Sequence 5 Sequence 6
Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sequence 7 Sequence 8 Sequence 9
Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Backup phase Backup phase Backup phase
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Serve Phase 1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
6 6 6
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
6 6 6 6 6 6
Backup phase Backup phase Backup phase
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv
8 8 8
Thru Red No Thru Red No Thru Red No
8 8 8 8 8 8
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Serve Phase
1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
6 6 6
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
6 6 6 6 6 6
Backup phase Backup phase Backup phase
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv
8 8 8
Thru Red No Thru Red No Thru Red No
8 8 8 8 8 8
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Serve Phase
1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
6 6 6
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
6 6 6 6 6 6
8 8 8
Thru Red No Thru Red No Thru Red No
8 8 8 8 8 8
Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT

Detector Configuration
Vehicle Detectors Pedestrian Detectors
Global Vehicle Detector Parameters
Global Ped Detector Parameters
Vehicle Detection Options
Detector Reset Enable Enabled
20 20 Addtnl Call PH No Act Max Pres
7 None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None Erratic Count
2 Failed Recall Call PH Call O/L
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Global Failed Recall
Global No Activity
Global Max Pres.
1 2
2 3
5 6
None
None
20 Max Recall
None 5
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
6 C1-43
J-4
J-5
J-6U
J-6L
J-7U
J-7L
J-8
J-9U C1-59
20 Global Erratic Ct
7 ------- -------
3 ------- -------
Global No Activity
Global Max Presence
Global Erratic Count
8 X X X X . X X X X X X X . X X X X X
I-1
Added Initial X X X X X . X
J-9L
6 6
6 6
8 8
8 8
5 7
27 28 Detector
2 4
6 8
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
1 5
26 I-2U
I-2L
I-3U
I-3L
I-4
I-5
I-6U
I-6L
I-7U
I-7L
I-8
I-9U
I-9L
J-1
J-2U
J-2L
J-3U
J-3L
C1-58
C1-41
C1-49
C1-55
C1-44
C1-64
C1-63
C1-46
C1-50
C1-57
C1-79
C1-66
C1-62
C1-77
C1-40
C1-48
C1-42 Slot
I-12U C1 Pin Number
C1-67
I-12L
I-13U
I-13L
C1-69
C1-68
C1-70
------- -------
------- -------
20 C1-56
C1-39
2 2
2 3
4 4
4 4
C1-76
C1-47
C1-78
24 25
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 C1-45
C1-65
4 1
Detector
C1-61
C1-60
6 7 8 9
Yellow Lock Call
Occupancy
Volume
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
.
. . .
1 2 3 4 5
.

X
X
25 26 27 28
. . .
. . . .
.
.

X X
.
.
23 24
. . . . . . . . . .
. .

Call
Queue
Extend
Red Lock Call
22 . . . . . . . . . . . .
.

X X X X X X
. . . . .
. . X . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .

X
. . . . . . . .

X X X X X X X
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
. .
. .
. .

X X
. .
. . . . . . . . .
. . .
. . . . . .
. .
. .
. . .

X X X X X X
. X
X X
. . .

X X X X X X X X
. .
.
.
.

X
.

X
. . .
. . .
. . . Detector Slot C1 Pin Number Call Phase Addtnl Call PH Switch Phase Delay Extend Queue Limit No Activity Max Pres. Erratic Count Fail Time Description . . . . .
7 8 Call O/L
Min Green 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Passage 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT
I I

Coordination Configuration
Coordination Parameters Patterns
Split 1 Split 2 Split 3
Split 4 Split 5 Split 6
9 Yellow Auto Permissive Fixed Max Inhibit
Fixed
Fixed
Mode
None
None
None
None
Mode
8 Yellow Auto Permissive Fixed Max Inhibit 1 1 1 1
7 Yellow Auto Permissive Fixed Max Inhibit 1
Description
Auto Permissive
Coord Mode
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Patt. Cycle Offset 1 Split Seq Reference FO Mode
Fixed
Fixed
1 Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Yellow Fixed
1 1
Max Inhibit
.
.

OL
Pln
1 1
1 1
1 1 1 1
Phs Det Ped
1 1 1
1 Max Mode Pln Pln Pln
Max Inhibit
Max Inhibit
Max Inhibit
Max Inhibit
1 4
1 Fixed None
Fixed None 1
FO Mode Mode
7 PH. Time Min Max
2 1 1
FO Mode
Fixed
Fixed
1 .
.Coord Phase
Fixed None .

FO Mode TimePH.
1 Max Inhibit
Min Max
1 1
1 1 1 1
Fixed None
Fixed None
. . Fixed None
Fixed None
7 . Fixed None
Fixed None
.
4 . .
6 . .
8 5
.
.
. .
.
.

Yellow
6 Yellow
Yellow Coord Phase
1 . . Fixed None 1
Min Cyc Limit % 25
Split Parameters
Max Dwell
Trans. Cover Ped
0 Pattern
.
.
.
.
3 . None 3 .
.

PH. MinTime Max Coord Phase Ref Phase FO Mode Mode PH.
2 . Fixed None 2
None
None
None
None
.

Fixed None
FO Mode Mode
Fixed Coord
6 5 . None 5
4 . None 4
. Fixed
. Fixed None
.
. None 6
Time MaxMin
.

Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed Phase Ref Phase
.
.
..
.
.
.

Fixed None
.

Yellow
Yellow
.
.

Max Cyc Limit %
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed Phase
.
.

Operational Mode
Coord Mode
Maximum Mode
Force Mode
Correction Mode
2 Manual Free
Per Pattern
Per Pattern
4 Per Pattern
Shortway (Auto)
25 5
1 3
1 1
1 1 1
.
.

Fixed None
. Fixed None
. Fixed None Ref Phase
.

Fixed None .
.
3 Ref
.
.
.
5 8
6 Fixed None
2 PH. Time Min Max FO Mode Mode Phase Ref Phase
8 7 . None 7
.
1 . . Fixed None Coord Phase Ref Phase
. None 8
2 . . Fixed None
3 . . Fixed None
4 . . Fixed None
Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
7 . . Fixed None
8 . . Fixed None
PH. Time Min Max Coord
1 .
2 .
3 .
5 . .
4 6
5 .
.

Fixed None
. Fixed None
3 . Fixed None
.
.
.
.
. None
8 . Fixed None
. Fixed None
7 . Fixed None
.
.
.

Printed on: 3/25/2021

INTELEGHT

Split 7 Split 8 Split 9
Advanced Coord Options
Ring Plan 1 Ring Plan 2 Ring Plan 3 Ring Plan 4 Ring Plan 5 Ring Plan 6 Ring Plan 7 Ring Plan 8 Ring Plan 9
3 0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
4 0 0
Offset Early Gap
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Ring
1 2
3 3 0 0
4 0 0
1 0 0
1 0 0
4 2 0 0
2 0 0
3 0
0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 . .
4 3 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
4 0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
1 4 0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
Ring Offset Early Gap
0 2
0 3 0 0
Ring Offset
.

Ring Offset Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
0 4 0 0
Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
4 Offset Early Gap
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Ring Plans
Ring
1 2
3 0
0 7 . . Fixed None
8 . . Fixed None
. Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
.

None
4 . . Fixed None
. Fixed None
2 . . Fixed None
PH. Time Min Max Phase FO Mode Mode
8 . . Fixed None Coord
1 .
3 .
5 . Fixed
. . Fixed None Coord Phase Ref Phase
5 . . Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
3 . . Fixed None
4 . . Fixed None
1 . . Fixed None
2 . . Fixed None
7 . . Fixed None
8 . . Fixed None
5 . . Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
. . Fixed None
2 . . Fixed None
PH. Time Min Max Coord Phase Ref Phase FO Mode Mode PH. Time Min Max FO Mode Mode Phase Ref . .
. .
.
8 .
.
9 Fixed None
Fixed None
7 7
.
. . .

Allow Split Underrun .
4 5 6
Allow Split Overrun .

Ring Plan
. .
4 . .
1 .

Allow No Coord Phase . . . . . .

Coord Now . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.

Pattern 1 2 3
.

Printed on: 3/25/2021

INTELEGHT

Scheduler Configuration
Schedule 1
1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Schedule 2
1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Schedule 3
1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Day Plan 1 Day Plan 2 Day Plan 3 . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
9 None
10 None
13 None
14 None
15 None
11 None
12 None
19 None
6 None
7 None
8 None
1 2
3 4
5 None
None
None
None
None
Action
Action Commands
Command Index Action Command Index Action Command Index Action Command Index Month of Year Days of Week Days of Month

J F M A M J J A S O N D T W T F S
0 0
4 Pattern
Pattern 1
Description Day Plan 0
S M
0 0
3 Pattern 3
4 Pattern 4
0 Special Functions
Event HR MIN ACT Description
Actions
.

Aux
Pattern 2
Action
1 2
. . .

None
12 None
19 None
0 6
Pattern 9
5 Pattern 7
Pattern 8
Pattern 5
Pattern 6
0 Pattern 10
64 Free
20 None
13 None
14 None
20 None
17 None
18 None
15 None
None 16 None
0 0
8 9 0 11
7 7
0 9
10 0
00 0
17 None
18 None
0 0
16 5 0
6 0 0
10 0
0 4
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
8 0
Day Plans
HR MIN
.
4 8
Description
0 0
0 0
0 0
Status Enabled
Status Enabled
HR
0 0
0 MIN ACT
Status Disabled
. . . . . .

Event
1 2
3 0
1 ACT Description
3 2
Event
.

S
X
Description Weekday
. .
0 0
0 0
1 0 0
2 3
0 X X
A
Day Plan
8 1
Month of Year Days of Week Days of Month

J F M A M J J A S O N
0 0
. . . . .
10 5
6 7
10 9
6 7
0 0
9 0 0 0
0 5
0 0
0 D S M T W T F S
X . X X X X X .

Month of Year Days of Week
J
X
F M
X

X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X

M J J A S
Weekend
Days of Month
X X X X . . . . .

TM
Description Day Plan 2

O N D S FTW
Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I ID I I I I I I I ID I I I I I I I ID I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I ID I I I I I I I ID I I I I I I I ID I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I ID I I I I I I I ID I I I I I I I ID I

Preempt Configuration
Preemption Configuration Preemption Options
Preemption Parameters Preempt Parameters
Track Overlap
Track 2 Overlap
Dwell Ped
Dwell Overlap
Cycling Phase
Cycling Ped
Cycling Overlap
Recovery Exit Omit
Preempt
Enabled
Type
Description
Dwell Phase
Exit Phase
Exit Overlaps
Track Phase
Track 2 Phases
1 .
.
.
.
6 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
5 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
4 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0 25.5 25.5
Dwell Green
Exit Ped Clear
Exit Yellow Change
Exit Red Clear
0 3 4 5 6

25.5 25.5
255 255
Max Presence
Max Presence Action
Preempt
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6 0
Preempt 1 2
Link
Delay
Min Duration
Min Presence
0 .
.
.

Exit Phases

25.5 25.5
255 255
0 Exit Type

25.5 0

0.0 0
0 Disabled
0 Disabled Disabled
0 0
0 25.5

25.5 25.5
1 .
.
.
.
32 .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.

Enter Min Walk
Enter Ped Clear
Track Green
Track Yellow Change
Track Red Clear
Track 2 Green
Track 2 Yellow
Track 2 Red
Track Ext. Gate Down
Enter Min Green
Enter Yellow Change
Enter Red Clear
Exit Max Mode
Exit Max Apply Time
Veh Exit Calls
Ped Exit Calls
0 0.0
0 Terminate
0 25.5

25.5 Terminate

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0
0 Dwell Ext Time
Max Exit Green
255

25.5 25.5
0 0

25.5 0 0 0
255

25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5
0 0
Terminate Terminate Terminate Terminate
0 0 0 0

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 0 0 0 0
255
0 0 0 0
0 0 0

25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5
0 0 0
. .

Require All Red Entry
Require Gate Down Track Exit
Require Gate Up Dwell Exit
Use Normal On/Normal Off Input
Immediate Ped Clear
Dwell Only Status Output
All Red Flash Dwell
Allow All Overlaps
Ped Recycle in Dwell Cycle
X
.
.
.
.
.

Preempt
Non Lock Mem
Not Overide Flash
Not Overide Next Preempt
Flash Dwell
1 Enabled
Rail Road
BBS Flash
0 0
0 0
Exit Phases Exit Phases Exit Phases Exit Phases Exit Phases Disabled Disabled
0 0 0
Disabled
1 2 3 4 5
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 255 255 255
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5
2 3 4 5 6
Disabled Enabled Disabled Enabled Enabled
Rail Road Emergency Veh Emergency Veh Emergency Veh Emergency Veh 2,5 1,6 3,8
2,6 2,6 3,8
1 Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT

Advanced I/O Configuration
Channel Configuration Concurrency Mode
Auto Concurrency
Channel Options
Cabinet Configuration
IO Modules
Input Points
C11-12 Not Active
Not Active
25 Idx
15 23
14 40
22 Not Active
C11-25
4 42
43 44
45 C1-76 5
C1-77
11 25
41 Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
19 C1-48
C11-29
C11-30
C11-26
C11-27
C11-28
Not Active
Not Active
Vehicle Det Call Not Active
C11-13
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
26 27
28 29
C1-54
C1-49
C11-16
C1-66 C1-82
C1-79
C1-80
C1-81
C1-72
C11-22
C11-17
C11-18
C11-19
C11-20
C11-21
58 59
60 61
54 C11-11
C1-78
C1-62
C1-75 C11-23
C11-24
56 57
Preempt Input
Not Active
C1-58
Vehicle Det Call C1-68
6 17
9 23
6 24
37 C1-73
C1-74
19 20
55 C11-10
3 4
C1-70
C1-71
C1-41
C1-42
Idx C1 Pin
2 16
8 22
3 C1-56
Input Type
Vehicle Det Call
Input Type
C1-43
C1-46
C1-47
5 Vehicle Det Call
Preempt Input
Preempt Input
Preempt Input
Vehicle Det Call
Ch
1 2
3 4
7 1
5 6
7 8
Control Type
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Vehicle Det Call
Phase Ped
Phase Ped
Phase Ped
12 ..
14 IO Module
1 X
1 2 3 4
..

XX
Type
7 6
5 6 7 8
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Overlap
Control Type
None
None
None
None
Phase Ped
Source
2 Input
C1-39
C1-40
Ch
9 10
11 12
13 C1 Pin
17 18
Channel
Flash Yellow
Flash Red
Flash Alternate Half Hertz
.

Source
1 2
3 4
5 6
Caltrans 332
X
....

X X
15 .

X
X..
16 X
X
C1 Pin
C11-15
C1-57 C1-69
C1 Pin
C1-55
C1-59 Input Input
21 7
Idx
2 6
4 8
C1-67 Input33
Input Type
Ped Det Call
50 51
52 49
C1-60
C1-61
34 35
36 38
39 Ped Det Call
Ped Det Call
Ped Det Call
27 13
28 1
53 Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Input Type Idx
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
30 31
32 46
47 48
62 63
64 Unit Interval Advance
Unit Local Flash Sense
Unit Stop Time
18 C1-65 10
24 14 1
15 16
21 Not Active
20 2
1 10
11 12
13 12
1 2
3 4
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
5 6
7 8
9 C1-44
C1-45
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Unit Automatic Flash
Preempt Input
Unit Manual Control Enable
Not Active
1 1
C1-51
C1-52
C1-53
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
26 1
C1-50
C1-63
C1-64
15 Not Active
14 15
Ch
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
.. 9
.
.
8 9 10 11 15 16
. . . . . . .
. . .
13 14
14 15
16 ..X 10
11 12
13 .X .......

Concurrency Mode
Auto
Concurrency
5,6,8,15
5,6,13,15
7,8,14,16
8,13
8,13,15
Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT
111111111111111 I I

Cabinet Configuration
Output Points
C1 Pin C1 Pin
Not Active
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Output Type
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Detector Reset
Watchdog
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
64 C11-8
C11-1
5 6
6 6
5 5
C11-4
61 62
63 15
C11-3
18 18
C1-98
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
12 11
11 10
10 10
9 9
C1-88
C1-89
C11-7
3 13
13 15
14 16
3 18
11 1
14 C1-101
C1-102
34 C1-36
37 C1-100
38 42
36 C1-84
9 17
17 17
12 12
39 C1-91
50 C1-93
51 C1-94
7 8
8 8
7 7
15 C11-6
44 C1-86
45 C1-87
60 49
C11-5
48 C1-90
47 2
1 1
1 46
1Output Output Type Idx
14 15
16 2
3 4
5 C1-2
2 2
4 4
4 3
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 C1-3
C1-4
C1-5
C1-6
C1-7
C1-8
C1-9
C1-10
C1-11
17 C1-19 16
28 C1-30
25 C1-27
26 C1-28
27 C1-29
22 C1-24
23 C1-25
18 C1-20
21 C1-23
20 C1-22
19 16
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
31 C1-33
32 C1-34
29 C1-31
30 C1-32
24 C1-26
C1-21
58 C11-2
59 40 C1-103
41 C1-83
56 C1-99
57 52 C1-95
53 C1-96
54 C1-97
55 C1-12
C1-13
C1-15
C1-16
C1-17
C1-18
43 C1-85
35 C1-37
C1-38
Idx
13 Output
33 C1-35
Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT

User Programs
Program 1
Enabled
40 None 0 None None None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
39 None 0 None None
38 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
37 None 0 None None
36 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
35 None 0 None None
34 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
33 None 0 None None
32 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
31 None 0 None None
30 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
29 None 0 None None
28 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
27 None 0 None None
26 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
25 None 0 None None
24 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
23 None 0 None None
22 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
21 None 0 None None
20 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
19 None 0 None None
18 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
17 None 0 None None
16 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
15 None 0 None None
14 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
13 None 0 None None
12 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
11 None 0 None None
10 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
9 None 0 None None
8 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
0 None 0.0 0.0
7 None 0 None None
6 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
5 None 0 None None
4 None 0 None None
3 None 0 None None None 0.0 0.0
None None
None 0.0 0.0 Aux switch stop time
Parameter B Idx Dly Ext Description
1 Unit Stop Time 1 Result=A Aux Switch State
Line Result Idx Operation Parameter A Idx
2 None None 0.0 0.0
Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT

Phase Timing and Options
Unit Information Phase Timing Phase Options
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. X X X X X X .
. . . X . . . .
. X . . . X . .
. X X X X X X .
. X . . . X . .
. . . . . . . .

Unit Parameters . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . X .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. X X X . X . .

Phase Configuration Global Phase Recalls Notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .

City of San Marcos
Mission @ Pacific
Phase
Enable
Non Lock Detector
Min Vehicle Recall
Max Vehicle Recall
Ped Recall
0 0
0 5 5 0 5 0 0
20 20 0 16 0
1 2 4
6 4
2 Phase
1 7
8 RR Clear
Phase
Min
Max
Ped
Green No Walk
Phase Not On
None
Green No Walk
WB
None
Startup Description
Phase Not On
Phase Not On
Added Initial
Maximum Initial
Time B4 Reduction
Cars B4 Reduction
Time To Reduce
Reduce By
Minimum Gap
Advance Walk
Delayed Ped
SB
EB Left
All Red Flash Sns
5 MCE Enable
Free Sequence
Start Yel. Override
Start Red Override
1 EB
NB
6 0 0
Disable
Phase Not On
0 0
0 0
Local CVM Fash Disable
3 All Red Flash Exit
Enable

0.0 5.0
0 No Ped Startup Call
Max Green 2
0 0
0 0.0
0 Add Initial Calculation
Ped Clear During Yellow
Ped Clear During Red Clr
Yellow Min Override
0 Red Clear
0 3.0

0.0 0
Max Green 1
Yellow Change 3.6 4.8 3.6

1.5 2.0 1.5

0.0 0.0 0.0
Soft Vehicle Recall
Dual Entry
Sim. Gap Disable
0 0 0

0.0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0

0.0 3.0
No Startup Call

0.0 Actuated Rest in Walk
Conditional Svc Enable
Auto Ped Clear
0 Passage
0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0 0
0 0.0
0 0
Man. Control Seq. 1
Startup All Red 6
127
Intelight MAXTIME 2.X
Mission
Pacific
Startup Flash
Controller Number
0 25
Phase 3
Software
Main Street
Side Street
IP Address
Min Green 2 0
Description
Walk
Ped Clear
Min Green
Passage 2
Extended Mode
10 3.0
30 4.8

1.2 0.0
0 0 0

3.6 3.6

0.0 1.5 1.5

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5 8
Min Green 2

0.0 0 0

0.0 0 0 Red Rest
0 0 Ped Recycle
5 6 7 8
0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0
0 3.0 2.5 3.0
0 0
0 0
8 10
5 Auto Flash Entry
Auto Flash Exit
Max Green 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Steady Don't Walk 0 0 0
6 3.0 3.0 0.0
0 0

EB NB SB EB
Left WB RR Clear
16 0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
All Dark Flash Sns Disable
0 0 0 0
30 20 30 30 0

0.0 0.0

0.0 Red Revert
Backup Time
Disable
Enable

6.0 600
Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT
~-I I I I I I I I I I

SAN MARCOS
DISCOVER LI FE'S Poss1 Bl LITI ES

Sequences
Sequence 1 Sequence 2 Sequence 3 Sequence 4 Sequence 5 Sequence 6 Sequence 7 Sequence 8 Sequence 9 Sequence 10 Sequence 11 Sequence 12 Sequence 13 Sequence 14 Sequence 15 Sequence 16
Standard Overlaps
. . . . .
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
. . . . .
. . . . .
4 4
0 5 0 0 0

0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 4
3,4 4
6 Enabled Enabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
EBLT Post Track EB Post Track
Normal Normal Off Off Off
5,7 2,3,5,7
2 3 4 5
Call for Svc
1 Enabled
WB Post Track
Normal
4,6,7
3 3
3 5

4.0 0.0
0 0

0.0 X
.
.

Startup Call
Recall
4 4
3 2,1,a,4,3,b
Ring Sequence Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
1 2,1,a,3,4,b
3 4 4
4 3
4 3
4 3
4 3
4 2 6,5,a,8,7,b 2 6,5,a,8,7,b 2 6,5,a,8,7,b
1 1,2,a,4,3,b 1
2 6,5,a,8,7,b
Ring Sequence
1 1,2,a,3,4,b
Trail Red
Walk
Ped Clear
Delay
Overlap
Negative Phs
Negative Ovlp
Negative Ped
Green Suppr
Trail Green
Trail Yellow
Modifier Phs
Type
Included Phs
1 1,2,a,4,3,b
2 6,5,a,7,8,b
3 4
3 2 5,6,a,7,8,b
Ring Sequence
4 2 6,5,a,7,8,b 2 5,6,a,8,7,b
Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
1 2,1,a,3,4,b
2 5,6,a,8,7,b
3 4
Ring Sequence
1 2,a,3,4,b
2 5,6,a,7,b
Ring Sequence
1 2,a,3,4,b
2 5,6,a,7,b
Overlaps
Enabled
Description
3 4
3 3
4 3
4 3
4 1 2,a,3,4,b 1 2,1,a,3,4,b 1 1,2,a,4,3,b 1 2,1,a,4,3,b Ring Sequence Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
3 Ring Sequence
2 5,6,a,7,b 2 5,6,a,7,8,b 2 5,6,a,7,8,b
Ring Sequence Ring Sequence Ring Sequence
2 5,6,a,8,7,b 2 5,6,a,8,7,b
3 1 2,1,a,4,3,b 1 1,2,a,3,4,b 1 1,2,a,4,3,b 1 2,1,a,4,3,b Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT

Backup Prevention / No Serve Phases
Sequence 1 Sequence 2 Sequence 3
Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sequence 4 Sequence 5 Sequence 6
Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Sequence 7 Sequence 8 Sequence 9
Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Backup Protection Plan Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve Call Phs No Serve
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Backup phase Backup phase Backup phase
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Serve Phase 1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
6 6 6
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
6 6 6 6 6 6
Backup phase Backup phase Backup phase
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv
8 8 8
Thru Red No Thru Red No Thru Red No
8 8 8 8 8 8
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Serve Phase
1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
6 6 6
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
6 6 6 6 6 6
Backup phase Backup phase Backup phase
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv
8 8 8
Thru Red No Thru Red No Thru Red No
8 8 8 8 8 8
Ph Call Ph Ph No Srv Serve Phase
1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1 Serve Phase1 1 1
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 2 2 2 2
4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4
6 6 6
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7
6 6 6 6 6 6
8 8 8
Thru Red No Thru Red No Thru Red No
8 8 8 8 8 8
Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT

Detector Configuration
Vehicle Detectors Pedestrian Detectors
Global Vehicle Detector Parameters
Global Ped Detector Parameters
Vehicle Detection Options
Detector Reset Enable Enabled Addtnl Call PH No Act Max Pres 4 None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None Erratic Count
2 Failed Recall Call PH Call O/L
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Global Failed Recall
Global No Activity
Global Max Pres.
1 2
2 3
5 6
None
None
20 Max Recall
None 5
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
6 C1-43
J-4
J-5
J-6U
J-6L
J-7U
J-7L
J-8
J-9U C1-59
Global Erratic Ct
7 ------- -------
3 ------- -------
Global No Activity
Global Max Presence
Global Erratic Count
3 X X X X . X X X X X X X . X X X X X
I-1
Added Initial X X X X X . X
J-9L
6 6
6 6
8 8
8 8
5 7
27 28 Detector
2 4
6 8
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
1 5
26 I-2U
I-2L
I-3U
I-3L
I-4
I-5
I-6U
I-6L
I-7U
I-7L
I-8
I-9U
I-9L
J-1
J-2U
J-2L
J-3U
J-3L
C1-58
C1-41
C1-49
C1-55
C1-44
C1-64
C1-63
C1-46
C1-50
C1-57
C1-79
C1-66
C1-62
C1-77
C1-40
C1-48
C1-42 Slot
I-12U C1 Pin Number
C1-67
I-12L
I-13U
I-13L
C1-69
C1-68
C1-70
------- -------
------- -------
C1-56
C1-39
2 2
2 3
4 4
4 4
C1-76
C1-47
C1-78
24 25

10.0 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
C1-45
C1-65
4 1
Detector
C1-61
C1-60
6 7 8 9
Yellow Lock Call
Occupancy
Volume
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
.
. . .
1 2 3 4 5
.

X
X
25 26 27 28
. . .
. . . .
.
.

X X
.
.
23 24
. . . . . . . . . .
. .

Call
Queue
Extend
Red Lock Call
22 . . . . . . . . . . . .
.

X X X X X X
. . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .

X
. . . . . . . .

X X X X X X X
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

X X

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
. .
. .
. .

X X
. .
. . . . . . . . .
. . .
. . . . . .
. .
. .
. . .

X X X X X X
. .

X X
. . .

X X X X X X X X
. .
.
.
.

X
.

X
. . .
. . .
. . . Detector Slot C1 Pin Number Call Phase Addtnl Call PH Switch Phase Delay Extend Queue Limit No Activity Max Pres. Erratic Count Fail Time Description . . . . .
7 8 Call O/L
Min Green 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Passage 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT
I I

Coordination Configuration
Coordination Parameters Patterns
Split 1 Split 2 Split 3
Split 4 Split 5 Split 6
9 Yellow Auto Permissive Fixed Max Inhibit
Fixed
Fixed
Mode
None
None
None
None
Mode
8 Yellow Auto Permissive Fixed Max Inhibit 1 1 1 1
7 Yellow Auto Permissive Fixed Max Inhibit 1
Description
Auto Permissive
Coord Mode
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Auto Permissive
Patt. Cycle Offset 1 Split Seq Reference FO Mode
Fixed
Fixed
1 Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Yellow Fixed
1 1
Max Inhibit
.
.

OL
Pln
1 1
1 1
1 1 1 1
Phs Det Ped
1 1 1
1 Max Mode Pln Pln Pln
Max Inhibit
Max Inhibit
Max Inhibit
Max Inhibit
1 4
1 Fixed None
Fixed None 1
FO Mode Mode
7 PH. Time Min Max
2 1 1
FO Mode
Fixed
Fixed
1 .
.Coord Phase
Fixed None .

FO Mode TimePH.
1 Max Inhibit
Min Max
1 1
1 1 1 1
Fixed None
Fixed None
. . Fixed None
Fixed None
7 . Fixed None
Fixed None
.
4 . .
6 . .
8 5
.
.
. .
.
.

Yellow
6 Yellow
Yellow Coord Phase
1 . . Fixed None 1
Min Cyc Limit % 25
Split Parameters
Max Dwell
Trans. Cover Ped
0 Pattern
.
.
.
.
3 . None 3 .
.

PH. MinTime Max Coord Phase Ref Phase FO Mode Mode PH.
2 . Fixed None 2
None
None
None
None
.

Fixed None
FO Mode Mode
Fixed Coord
6 5 . None 5
4 . None 4
. Fixed
. Fixed None
.
. None 6
Time MaxMin
.

Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed Phase Ref Phase
.
.
..
.
.
.

Fixed None
.

Yellow
Yellow
.
.

Max Cyc Limit %
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed
Fixed Phase
.
.

Operational Mode
Coord Mode
Maximum Mode
Force Mode
Correction Mode
2 Manual Free
Full Permissive
Per Pattern
4 Per Pattern
Shortway (Auto)
25 5
1 3
1 1
1 1 1
.
.

Fixed None
. Fixed None
. Fixed None Ref Phase
.

Fixed None .
.
3 Ref
.
.
.
5 8
6 Fixed None
2 PH. Time Min Max FO Mode Mode Phase Ref Phase
8 7 . None 7
.
1 . . Fixed None Coord Phase Ref Phase
. None 8
2 . . Fixed None
3 . . Fixed None
4 . . Fixed None
Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
7 . . Fixed None
8 . . Fixed None
PH. Time Min Max Coord
1 .
2 .
3 .
5 . .
4 6
5 .
.

Fixed None
. Fixed None
3 . Fixed None
.
.
.
.
. None
8 . Fixed None
. Fixed None
7 . Fixed None
.
.
.

Printed on: 3/25/2021

INTELEGHT

Split 7 Split 8 Split 9
Advanced Coord Options
Ring Plan 1 Ring Plan 2 Ring Plan 3 Ring Plan 4 Ring Plan 5 Ring Plan 6 Ring Plan 7 Ring Plan 8 Ring Plan 9
3 0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
4 0 0
Offset Early Gap
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Ring
1 2
3 3 0 0
4 0 0
1 0 0
1 0 0
4 2 0 0
2 0 0
3 0
0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 . .
4 3 0 0
3 0 0
4 0 0
4 0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
1 4 0 0
Ring Offset Early Gap
Ring Offset Early Gap
0 2
0 3 0 0
Ring Offset
.

Ring Offset Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
3 0 0
0 4 0 0
Early Gap
1 0 0
2 0 0
4 Offset Early Gap
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Ring Plans
Ring
1 2
3 0
0 7 . . Fixed None
8 . . Fixed None
. Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
.

None
4 . . Fixed None
. Fixed None
2 . . Fixed None
PH. Time Min Max Phase FO Mode Mode
8 . . Fixed None Coord
1 .
3 .
5 . Fixed
. . Fixed None Coord Phase Ref Phase
5 . . Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
3 . . Fixed None
4 . . Fixed None
1 . . Fixed None
2 . . Fixed None
7 . . Fixed None
8 . . Fixed None
5 . . Fixed None
6 . . Fixed None
. . Fixed None
2 . . Fixed None
PH. Time Min Max Coord Phase Ref Phase FO Mode Mode PH. Time Min Max FO Mode Mode Phase Ref . .
. .
.
8 .
.
9 Fixed None
Fixed None
7 7
.
. . .

Allow Split Underrun .
4 5 6
Allow Split Overrun .

Ring Plan
. .
4 . .
1 .

Allow No Coord Phase . . . . . .

Coord Now . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.

Pattern 1 2 3
.

Printed on: 3/25/2021

INTELEGHT

Scheduler Configuration
Schedule 1
1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Schedule 2
1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1

X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Schedule 3
1 2 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Day Plan 1 Day Plan 2 Day Plan 3 . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
9 None
10 None
13 None
14 None
15 None
11 None
12 None
19 None
6 None
7 None
8 None
1 2
3 4
5 None
None
None
None
None
Action
Action Commands
Command Index Action Command Index Action Command Index Action Command Index Month of Year Days of Week Days of Month

J F M A M J J A S O N D T W T F S
0 0
4 Pattern
Pattern 1
Description Day Plan 0
S M
0 0
3 Pattern 3
4 Pattern 4
0 Special Functions
Event HR MIN ACT Description
Actions
.

Aux
Pattern 2
Action
1 2
. . .

None
12 None
19 None
0 6
Pattern 9
5 Pattern 7
Pattern 8
Pattern 5
Pattern 6
0 Pattern 10
64 Free
20 None
13 None
14 None
20 None
17 None
18 None
15 None
None 16 None
0 0
8 9 0 11
7 7
0 9
10 0
00 0
17 None
18 None
0 0
16 5 0
6 0 0
10 0
0 4
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
8 0
Day Plans
HR MIN
.
4 8
Description
0 0
0 0
0 0
Status Enabled
Status Enabled
HR
0 0
0 MIN ACT
Status Disabled
. . . . . .

Event
1 2
3 0
1 ACT Description
3 2
Event
.

S
X
Description Weekday
. .
0 0
0 0
1 0 0
2 3
0 X X
A
Day Plan
8 1
Month of Year Days of Week Days of Month

J F M A M J J A S O N
0 0
. . . . .
10 5
6 7
10 9
6 7
0 0
9 0 0 0
0 5
0 0
0 D S M T W T F S
X . X X X X X .

Month of Year Days of Week
J
X
F M
X

X X X X X X X X

X X X X X X X X

M J J A S
Weekend
Days of Month
X X X X . . . . .

TM
Description Day Plan 2

O N D S FTW
Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I ID I I I I I I I ID I I I I I I I ID I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I ID I I I I I I I ID I I I I I I I ID I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I ID I I I I I I I ID I I I I I I I ID I

Preempt Configuration
Preemption Configuration Preemption Options
Preemption Parameters Preempt Parameters
Track Overlap
Track 2 Overlap
Dwell Ped
Dwell Overlap
Cycling Phase
Cycling Ped
Cycling Overlap
Recovery Exit Omit
Preempt
Enabled
Type
Description
Dwell Phase
Exit Phase
Exit Overlaps
Track Phase
Track 2 Phases
.
.
.
.
6 .

X
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
5 .

X
.
.
.
.
.

X
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
4 .

X
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1 25.5 25.5
Dwell Green
Exit Ped Clear
Exit Yellow Change
Exit Red Clear
0 3 4 5 6

25.5 25.5
255 255
Max Presence
Max Presence Action
Preempt
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6 0
Preempt 1 2
Link
Delay
Min Duration
Min Presence
1 .
.
.

Exit Phases

25.5 25.5
255 255
0 Exit Type

25.5 0

0.0 255
0 Disabled
0 Disabled Disabled
0 0
0 25.5

25.5 25.5
1 .

X
.
.
32 .

X
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.

Enter Min Walk
Enter Ped Clear
Track Green
Track Yellow Change
Track Red Clear
Track 2 Green
Track 2 Yellow
Track 2 Red
Track Ext. Gate Down
Enter Min Green
Enter Yellow Change
Enter Red Clear
Exit Max Mode
Exit Max Apply Time
Veh Exit Calls
Ped Exit Calls
0 0.0
0 Terminate
0 25.5

25.5 Terminate

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 255 255 255
0 Dwell Ext Time
Max Exit Green
255

25.5 25.5
0 0

25.5 0 0 0
255

25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5
0 0
Terminate Terminate Terminate Terminate
0 0 0 0

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 0 0 0 0
255
0 0 0 0
1 1 1

25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5
0 5 5
. .

Require All Red Entry
Require Gate Down Track Exit
Require Gate Up Dwell Exit
Use Normal On/Normal Off Input
Immediate Ped Clear
Dwell Only Status Output
All Red Flash Dwell
Allow All Overlaps
Ped Recycle in Dwell Cycle
X
.
.
.
.
.
1,2,3
Preempt
Non Lock Mem
Not Overide Flash
Not Overide Next Preempt
Flash Dwell
1 Enabled
Rail Road
BBS Flash
7 5 5
0 0
Exit Phases Exit Phases Exit Phases Exit Phases Exit Phases Disabled Disabled
0 0 0
Disabled
1 2 3 4 5
0 0 0 0 0
0 10 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 255 255 255
30 20 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5

25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5 25.5
2,6
1,2,3
2 3 4 5 6
Enabled Enabled Enabled Enabled Enabled
Rail Road Emergency Veh Emergency Veh Emergency Veh Emergency Veh RR Preempt Eastbound Southbound Westbound Northbound
7 4 2,5 4 6 3
1,2,3
2,6 4 2,6 3
1,2,3
2,6
Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT

Advanced I/O Configuration
Channel Configuration Concurrency Mode
Auto Concurrency
Channel Options
Cabinet Configuration
IO Modules
Input Points
C11-12 Not Active
Not Active
25 Idx
15 23
14 40
22 Not Active
C11-25
4 42
43 44
45 C1-76 5
C1-77
11 25
41 Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
19 C1-48
C11-29
C11-30
C11-26
C11-27
C11-28
Not Active
Not Active
Vehicle Det Call Not Active
C11-13
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
26 27
28 29
C1-54
C1-49
C11-16
C1-66 C1-82
C1-79
C1-80
C1-81
C1-72
C11-22
C11-17
C11-18
C11-19
C11-20
C11-21
58 59
60 61
54 C11-11
C1-78
C1-62
C1-75 C11-23
C11-24
56 57
Preempt Input
Not Active
C1-58
Vehicle Det Call C1-68
6 17
9 23
6 24
37 C1-73
C1-74
19 20
55 C11-10
3 4
C1-70
C1-71
C1-41
C1-42
Idx C1 Pin
2 16
8 22
3 C1-56
Input Type
Vehicle Det Call
Input Type
C1-43
C1-46
C1-47
5 Vehicle Det Call
Preempt Input
Preempt Input
Preempt Input
Vehicle Det Call
Ch
1 2
3 4
3 5
6 7
8 Control Type
Overlap
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Phase Vehicle
Vehicle Det Call
Phase Ped
Phase Ped
Phase Ped
12 ..
14 IO Module
1 X
1 2 3 4
..

XX
Type
4 6
5 6 7 8
Overlap
Phase Vehicle
None
Overlap
Control Type
None
None
None
None
Phase Ped
Source
2 Input
C1-39
C1-40
Ch
9 10
11 12
13 C1 Pin
17 18
Channel
Flash Yellow
Flash Red
Flash Alternate Half Hertz
.

Source
1 2
3 4
2 6
Caltrans 332
X
....

X X
15 .

X
X..
16 X
X
C1 Pin
C11-15
C1-57 C1-69
C1 Pin
C1-55
C1-59 Input Input
21 7
Idx
2 6
4 8
C1-67 Input33
Input Type
Ped Det Call
50 51
52 49
C1-60
C1-61
34 35
36 38
39 Ped Det Call
Ped Det Call
Ped Det Call
27 13
28 1
53 Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Input Type Idx
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
30 31
32 46
47 48
62 63
64 Unit Interval Advance
Unit Local Flash Sense
Unit Stop Time
18 C1-65 10
24 14 1
15 16
21 Not Active
20 2
1 10
11 12
13 12
1 2
3 4
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
5 6
7 8
9 C1-44
C1-45
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Preempt Input
Preempt Input
Unit Manual Control Enable
Not Active
1 1
C1-51
C1-52
C1-53
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
Vehicle Det Call
26 1
C1-50
C1-63
C1-64
15 Not Active
13,14,15,16
Ch
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
.. 9
.
.
3 9 10 11 15 16
. . . . . . .
. . .
13 14
14 15
16 ..X 10
11 12
13 .X .......

Concurrency Mode
Auto
Concurrency
5,6,8,13,15
5,8,16
5,8,14
13 8,13,15
Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT
111111111111111 I I

Cabinet Configuration
Output Points
C1 Pin C1 Pin
Not Active
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Not Active
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Output Type
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Detector Reset
Watchdog
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
64 C11-8
C11-1
5 6
6 6
5 5
C11-4
61 62
63 15
C11-3
18 18
C1-98
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
12 11
11 10
10 10
9 9
C1-88
C1-89
C11-7
3 13
13 15
14 16
3 18
11 1
14 C1-101
C1-102
34 C1-36
37 C1-100
38 42
36 C1-84
9 17
17 17
12 12
39 C1-91
50 C1-93
51 C1-94
7 8
8 8
7 7
15 C11-6
44 C1-86
45 C1-87
60 49
C11-5
48 C1-90
47 2
1 1
1 46
1Output Output Type Idx
14 15
16 2
3 4
5 C1-2
2 2
4 4
4 3
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
Channel Yellow Ped Clear Driver
Channel Green Walk Driver
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 C1-3
C1-4
C1-5
C1-6
C1-7
C1-8
C1-9
C1-10
C1-11
17 C1-19 16
28 C1-30
25 C1-27
26 C1-28
27 C1-29
22 C1-24
23 C1-25
18 C1-20
21 C1-23
20 C1-22
19 16
Channel Red Do Not Walk Driver
31 C1-33
32 C1-34
29 C1-31
30 C1-32
24 C1-26
C1-21
58 C11-2
59 40 C1-103
41 C1-83
56 C1-99
57 52 C1-95
53 C1-96
54 C1-97
55 C1-12
C1-13
C1-15
C1-16
C1-17
C1-18
43 C1-85
35 C1-37
C1-38
Idx
13 Output
33 C1-35
Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT

User Programs
Program 1
Enabled
40 None 0 None None None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
39 None 0 None None
38 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
37 None 0 None None
36 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
35 None 0 None None
34 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
33 None 0 None None
32 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
31 None 0 None None
30 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
29 None 0 None None
28 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
27 None 0 None None
26 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
25 None 0 None None
24 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
23 None 0 None None
22 None 0 None None
None 0.0 0.0
None 0.0 0.0
21 None 0 None None
20 None 0 None None
108 Local Variable 110 0.0 2.0 RR2 exiting and Q Det 3,8 on Local Variable 110 0.0 2.0 RR2 exiting and Q Det 1,6 on 19 Preempt Input 13 Result=(A AND B) Local Variable
18 Preempt Input 12 Result=(A AND B) Local Variable 106 104 Local Variable 110 0.0 2.0 RR2 exiting and Q Det 4,7 on Local Variable 110 0.0 2.0 RR2 exiting and Q Det 2,5 on 17 Preempt Input 11 Result=(A AND B) Local Variable
16 Preempt Input 10 Result=(A AND B) Local Variable 102 2 Number 8 0.0 1.0 RR 1 is exiting
Previous Line Result 0.0 0.0 Det 3,8 latch
15 Local Variable 110 Result=(A == B) Preempt Interval
14 Local Variable 108 Result=Latch(A, B) Local Variable 107 None 0.0 0.0 Det 3,8 off
None 5.0 0.0 Det 3,8 on
13 None 0 Result=!A Previous Line Result
12 Local Variable 107 Result=A Vehicle Detector Input
105 Previous Line Result 0.0 0.0 Det 1,6 latch
None 0.0 0.0 Det 1,6 off
11 Local Variable 106 Result=Latch(A, B) Local Variable 10 None 0 Result=!A Previous Line Result
None 5.0 0.0 Det 1,6 on
Previous Line Result 0.0 0.0 Det 4,7 latch
9 Local Variable 105 Result=A Vehicle Detector Input
8 Local Variable 104 Result=Latch(A, B) Local Variable 103 None 0.0 0.0 Det 4,7 off
0 None 5.0 0.0 Det 4,7 on
7 None 0 Result=!A Previous Line Result
6 Local Variable 103 Result=A Vehicle Detector Input
101 Previous Line Result 0.0 0.0 Det 2,5 latch
None 0.0 0.0 Det 2,5 off
5 Local Variable 102 Result=Latch(A, B) Local Variable
4 None 0 Result=!A Previous Line Result
3 Local Variable 101 Result=A Vehicle Detector Input None 5.0 0.0 Det 2,5 on None None
None 0.0 0.0
Parameter B Idx Dly Ext Description
1 Unit Stop Time 1 Result=A Aux Switch State
Line Result Idx Operation Parameter A Idx
2 None None 0.0 0.0
Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT

Phase Timing and Options
Unit Information Phase Timing Phase Options
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

X X X X X X X X
. . . X . . . X
. X . . . X . .

X X X X X X X X
. X . . X X . .
. . . . . . . .

Unit Parameters . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . X . . . X
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. X . X . X . X
Phase Configuration Global Phase Recalls Notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .

City of San Marcos
Rancho Santa Fe @ Capalina
Phase
Enable
Non Lock Detector
Min Vehicle Recall
Max Vehicle Recall
Ped Recall
0 0
7 0 7 0 7 0 7
0 23 0 11 0
1 2 4
6 4
2 Phase
1 7
8 EB Left
Phase
Min
Max
Ped
Green No Walk
Phase Not On
Phase Not On WB
Green No Walk
SB
Phase Not On
Description
SB Left
Startup
Phase Not On
Phase Not On
Added Initial
Maximum Initial
Time B4 Reduction
Cars B4 Reduction
Time To Reduce
Reduce By
Minimum Gap
Advance Walk
Delayed Ped
EB
NB Left
All Red Flash Sns
5 MCE Enable
Free Sequence
Start Yel. Override
Start Red Override
1 NB
WB Left
6 0 0
Disable
Phase Not On
0 0
0 0
Local CVM Fash Disable
3 All Red Flash Exit
Enable

0.0 0.0
0 No Ped Startup Call
Max Green 2
0 0
0 0.0
0 Add Initial Calculation
Ped Clear During Yellow
Ped Clear During Red Clr
Yellow Min Override
0 Red Clear
20 4.0

2.0 0
Max Green 1
Yellow Change 4.0 4.4 3.0

2.0 2.0 1.0

0.0 0.0 0.0
Soft Vehicle Recall
Dual Entry
Sim. Gap Disable
0 0 0

0.0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0

0.0 3.5
No Startup Call

3.0 Actuated Rest in Walk
Conditional Svc Enable
Auto Ped Clear
0 Passage
0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0 0
0 0.0
0 0
Man. Control Seq. 1
Startup All Red 6
21 Intelight MAXTIME 2.X
Rancho Santa Fe
Capalina
Startup Flash
Controller Number
0 20
Phase 3
Software
Main Street
Side Street
IP Address
Min Green 2 0
Description
SB
Left
Walk
Ped Clear
Min Green
Passage 2
Extended Mode
15 3.0
50 4.4

2.0 0.0
0 0 0

3.0 3.5

0.0 1.0 3.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5 8
Min Green 2

0.0 0 0

0.0 0 0 Red Rest
0 0 Ped Recycle
5 6 7 8
0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0
0 3.0 3.0 3.0
0 0
8 0
6 15
7 Auto Flash Entry
Auto Flash Exit
Max Green 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Steady Don't Walk 0 0 0
5 3.0 3.0 3.0
WB
0 0
NB WB
Left EB NB Left SB EB Left
13 19

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
All Dark Flash Sns Disable
0 0 0 0
40 20 50 20 40

3.0 0.0

0.0 Red Revert
Backup Time
Disable
Enable

6.0 600
Printed on: 3/25/2021
INTEL~GHT
~-I I I I I I I I I I

SAN MARCOS

DISCOVER LIFE'S POSSIBILITIES

Sequences
Sequence 1 Sequence 2 Sequence 3 Sequence 4 Sequence 5 Sequence 6 Sequence 7 Sequence 8 Sequence 9 Sequence 10 Sequence 11 Sequence 12 Sequence 13 Sequence 14 Sequence 15 Sequence 16
Standard Overlaps
. . . . .
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
. . . . .
. . . . .
0 0 0 0 0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6 Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled
Off Off Off Off Off
2 3 4 5
Call for Svc
1 Disabled
Off
0 0.0