San Marcos City Council
June 24, 2025

23811 Washington Ave, C110-333, Murrieta, CA 92562 phone 760-473-1253

11/4/2024 22-124 Armorlite Lofts 225 Energy 1
November 4, 2024

Sophia Habl Mitchell
Sophia Mitchell & Associates
P.O. Box 1700
Gualala, CA 95445

RE: Armorlite Lofts 225 Developm ent (GPA23-0002, R23-0001, SDP23-0003, CUP23-0002) Energy Usage Letter – San Marcos CA

This analysis evaluates both construction and operational energy efficiency as it relates to non- renewable fuel sources including Electrical, Natural Gas, Diesel and Gasoline for the proposed Armorlite Lofts Development. This effort was prepared according to requirements established within Public Resource Code (PRC) Section 21100(b)(3) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15126.4. The intent is to adequately address the following CEQA question:

Would the project:

1. Result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation?

2. Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?

Project Description

The project proposes up to 165 multi-family residential units within a five-story building situated on approximately 2.44 acres. The project would al so include up to 5,600 square feet (SF) of retail/flex use. Additionally, the project proposes as many as 254 parking spaces which includes 13 Level 2 electric vehicle (EV) spaces, 62 EV ready spaces, and 25 EV capable spaces. The project seeks a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and to rezone the property from Public- Institutional (P-I) Specific Plan Area (SPA). Construction would be expected to start in 2026 and be completed in about one year. Full operations are expected in late 2027.

The General Plan Land Use designation for the site is P-I. This use is typically used for any type of public use, including schools, hospitals, ci vic centers etc. The allowable use onsite per the zoning could have a maximum floor area ratio (F AR) of 3.0. Based on this, any facility which could be constructed onsite would be limited to approximately 318,000 SF. The total area including the parking would have a total gross floor area of 158,000 SF and would have a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 1.5.

Sophia Habl Mitchell
Sophia Mitchell & Associates
P.O. Box 1700
Gualala, CA 95445
Ldn Consulting, Inc.
23811 Washington Ave, C110-333
Murrieta CA 92562
phone 760-473-1253

11/4/2024 22-124 Armorlite Lofts 225 Energy 2
One other approved use under the General Plan would be to construct a data center.

Realistically, the site could be developed with a 160,000 SF data center or larger if multiple stories are constructed. Data centers are recognized as very high consumers of electrical energy.

For example, a 413,000 SF data center in Santa Clara was found to consume 665,750 megawatt hours (MWH) or 1.61 MWH/SF/year and 410 daily vehicular trips (Ramboll Environ, 2016). Based on this, a 160,000 SF building would require at least 257,600 MWH annually.

Construction of the proposed project or the alternative General Plan consistent data center could be expected to occur over a conservative worst-case 12-month fast paced duration. Grading would consist of approximately 6,950 cubic yards (CY) of cut material an d 4,400 CY of fill material. Based on discussions with the applican t, shrinkage and swelling would be expected and the total export expected would be approximately 2,250 CY of material. During grading blasting may be required and if blasting is required, a standalone rock crusher similar to a Terex 4242SR 310 horsepower (HP)+/- will be utilized.

Construction

Energy usage for construction equipment is best estimated using total horsepower hours and an assumed thermal efficiency of 30%. The most common measure of the energy efficiency of a tractor is referred to here as “specific volumetric fuel consumption” (SVFC), which is given in units of gallons per horsepower-hour (gal/hp-h). SVFC for diesel engines typically ranges from

0.0476 to 0.1110 gal/hp-h. Inverting these numbers yields a range of between 12-21 hp-h/gal.

Over the last 30 years, fuel efficiency at maximum power has increased from roughly 14.5 to

16.5 hp-h/gal (VirginiaTech, 2010).

Project construction dates were estimated using CalEEMod and follow assumptions identified in both the project Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) analysis. Based on this, an estimated construction kickoff starting in 2026 and comple ting the project roughly one year later. Based on the equipment, quantity, work time, Horsepower (HP), the project would require a total of 489,450 hp-h (See Table 1 Below). Based on th is, the project would consume roughly 29,663 gallons of diesel for construction. The project would require essentially the same energy during construction as the GP Buildout scenario. It should be noted that fuel consumption would go up if diesel construction equipment is poorly main tained. Based on this, the project shall properly maintain all equipment per manufacture re commendations. The model is provided as Attachments A to this report.

Sophia Habl Mitchell
Sophia Mitchell & Associates
P.O. Box 1700
Gualala, CA 95445
Ldn Consulting, Inc.
23811 Washington Ave, C110-333
Murrieta CA 92562
phone 760-473-1253

11/4/2024 22-124 Armorlite Lofts 225 Energy 3
Table 2: Proposed Construction Phase and Duration
Equipment
Identification
Const.

Days
Number
per Day
Hours Per
Day Hp Load
Factor HP Hours
Site Preparation 3
Graders 1 8 148 0.41 1,456.32
Scrapers 1 8 423 0.48 4,872.96
Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes 1 7 84 0.37 652.68
Grading 20
Graders 1 8 148 0.41 9,708.80
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 367 0.4 23,488.00
Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes 2 7 84 0.37 8,702.40
Crushing/Proc.

Equipment 1 6 310 0.41 15,252.00
Building
Construction 220
Cranes 1 8 367 0.29 187,316.80
Forklifts 2 7 82 0.2 50,512.00
Generator Sets 1 8 14 0.74 18,233.60
Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes 1 6 84 0.37 41,025.60
Welders 3 8 46 0.45 109,296.00
Paving 10
Pavers 1 8 84 0.37 2,486.40
Paving Equipment 1 8 81 0.42 2,721.60
Rollers 1 8 89 0.36 2,563.20
Architectural
Coating 80
Air Compressors 1 6 37 0.48 8,524.8
Total Horsepower Hours 489,449.96
Total Diesel Fuel (Gal) @ 16.5 hp-h/gal 29,663.63
This equipment list is based upon equipment inventory and estimates within CalEEMod 2022.1

Construction energy from workers, vendors, and haulage are based on the estimated vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for the total construction duration which is 493,141 miles for the project which is calculated from the CalEEMod output file provided in Attachment A to this report. In California, the average fuel economy for on-road vehicles is 24.1 miles per gal or 0.0415 gal/mile (CARB, 2022). Based on this, the vehicular trips would consume roughly 20,465 gallons during construction.

On-road vehicles are regulated by state and federal regulations and, vehicular fleet efficiencies are getting better each year. Additionally, all construction equipment shall be maintained as Sophia Habl Mitchell
Sophia Mitchell & Associates
P.O. Box 1700
Gualala, CA 95445
Ldn Consulting, Inc.
23811 Washington Ave, C110-333
Murrieta CA 92562
phone 760-473-1253

11/4/2024 22-124 Armorlite Lofts 225 Energy 4
needed per the manufacturers’ recommendations. Since the projected energy usage of the project and the GP Buildout scenario would be a ssumed to be identical, the project would not significantly alter the energy consumption with respect to construction when compared to the GP Buildout scenario but would not necessarily increase energy demand with respect to the proposed GP Buildout scenario either.

The proposed equipment would be required to construct the proposed project and is consistent with what would be likely required within the GP Buildout scenario as well. The equipment will be maintained and operated in accordance with the equipment manufacturer recommendations.

Given this, since the proposed project wouldn’t increase energy requirements at the time of construction when compared to the GP Buildout scenario, and since the construction equipment would not be in excess of what would be requir ed to complete the project, the construction activities would not be
wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary as related to the required consumption of energy resources during project construction. Therefore, a less than significant energy impact would be expected during the construction activities of the project.

Operations

Energy – Utility Demand

The State of California has implemented a number of energy reducing policies largely geared to reducing Greenhouse gasses (GHGs). The most notable is Assembly Bill (AB) 32, Senate Bill (SB) 32, and Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. In addition, the state has implemented two scoping plan updates which are geared to reduce GHG emissions by reducing energy consumption, increasing energy efficiency and increasing the usage of renewable sources. The state has also taken a strong steps in increasing building efficiencies under Title 24, Part 6 of California’s Code of Regulations. The project would be required, at a minimum, to comply with the latest version of Title 24 standards at the time the project seeks building permits. At the time this report was written, the 2022 standards were applicable and went into effect on January 1, 2023. The 2023 standards continue to improve upon the 2019 standards for residential and nonresidential buildings. It should be noted that the State updates these regulations every three years.

In addition to the CEC’s efforts, in 2008, the California Building Standards Commission adopted the nation’s first green building standards. The California Green Building Standards Code (Part 1 1 o f T i t l e 2 4 ) i s c o m m o n l y r e f e r r e d t o a s C A L G r e e n a n d e s t a b l i s h e s m i n i m u m m a n d a t o r y standards as well as voluntary standards pertaining to the planning and design of sustainable site development, energy efficiency (in excess of the California Energy Code requirements), water conservation, material conservation, and interior air quality. The current CALGreen standards were last updated in 2022 and went into effect January 1, 2023. CALGreen standards include mandatory measures for planning and design, energy efficiency, water and conservation efficiency, material and resource conservation as well as Environmental Quality (California Title 24, Part 11, 2022).

Sophia Habl Mitchell
Sophia Mitchell & Associates
P.O. Box 1700
Gualala, CA 95445
Ldn Consulting, Inc.
23811 Washington Ave, C110-333
Murrieta CA 92562
phone 760-473-1253

11/4/2024 22-124 Armorlite Lofts 225 Energy 5
Furthermore, the City has updated their Climate Action Plan (CAP) and now requires projects exceeding 500 metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO 2e) per year to complete the CAP Consistency Review Checklist (Ascent, 2020) . The CAP checklist provides a number of requirements designed to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) of which the primary method is to reduce the usage of non-renewable energy.

Finally, the state has implemented a number of regulations which force electrical utility providers to increase renewable portfolios or procurement. Specifically, the following policies and how they shaped the current energy supply and the future energy horizon are noted below:

SB 1078 (2002) established the Renewables Port folio Standard (RPS) program, which requires an annual increase in renewable generation by the utilities equiva lent to at least 1 percent of sales, with an aggregate goal of 20 percent by 2017. This goal was subsequently accelerated, requiring utilities to obtain 20 percent of their power from renewable sources by 2010.

SB X1 2 (2011) expanded the RPS by establishing that 20 percent of the total electricity sold to retail customers in California per year by December 31, 2013, and 33 percent by December 31, 2020, and in subsequent years be secured from qualifying renewable energy sources. Under the bill, a renewable electrical ge neration facility is one that uses biomass, solar thermal, photovoltaic, wind, geothermal, fuel cells using renewable fuels, small hydroelectric generation of 30 megawatts or less, digester gas, munici pal solid waste conversion, landfill gas, ocean wave, ocean thermal, or tidal current, and that meets other specified requirements with respect to its location. In addition to the retail sellers previously covered by the RPS, SB X1 2 added local, publicly owned electric utilities to the RPS.

SB 350 (2015) further expanded the RPS by establishing that 50 percent of the total electricity sold to retail customers in California per year by December 31, 2030 be secured from qualifying renewable energy sources. In addition, SB 350 includes the goal to double the energy efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas final end uses (such as heating, cooling, lighting, or class of energy uses on which an energy-efficiency program is focused) of retail customers through energy conservation and efficiency.

SB 100 (2018) has further accelerated and expanded the RPS, requiring achievement of a 50 percent RPS by December 31, 2026, and a 60 percent RPS by December 31, 2030. SB 100 also established a new statewide policy goal that call s for eligible renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources to supply 100 percent of electricit y retail sales and 100 percent of electricity procured to serve all state agencies by December 31, 2045.

The natural gas and electrical en ergy usage utilized by project could be compared to the GP Buildout scenario which is presented in Table 3 below. Based on the results, the project is estimated to consume 1,192,176 kBTU more natural gas annually than the GP Buildout Scenario, since the data center would not likely require natural gas. The project would consume Sophia Habl Mitchell
Sophia Mitchell & Associates
P.O. Box 1700
Gualala, CA 95445
Ldn Consulting, Inc.
23811 Washington Ave, C110-333
Murrieta CA 92562
phone 760-473-1253

11/4/2024 22-124 Armorlite Lofts 225 Energy 6
256,692,993 kWh less electrical energy annually when compared to the predicted energy usage scenario which could be constructed under the General Plan. This is largely due to the fact that Data Centers consume significant amounts of electrical energy each year.

In the event the project decides to go all electric, if we assumed the equivalent energy would be required and converted the natural gas energy usage estimated by CalEEMod for each land use from kBTU/year to electrical energy usage (in kWh/year) using a standard conversion rate of 3.412 kBTU/kWh an additional 349,406 kWH would be required. This would mean the project would still require 256,343,587 kWH less than a data center. Since there isn’t a requirement to use all electric, the natural gas discussion will be the basis of this analysis.

Under this comparison, reductions from Title 24 of the California Building Code (2019) were accounted for which would improve the efficiency of the project in terms of energy consumption.

Title 24 (2022) has not been included into CalEEMod 2022.1 but would essentially with some benefit reduce energy consumption for both scenarios. It should be noted that further reductions would be expected with the incorporation of the City’s CAP measures, which were not considered in this energy assessment. Based on this, energy use associated with project operations would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or an unnecessary use of energy. The CalEEMod estimation tool output for the project and the GP Buildout scenario are provided as Attachments A and -
B to this letter.

Table 3: Annul Energy Use Project vs. GP Buildout Scenario Energy Source Project GP Buildout Scenario
Project Reductions
compared to GP
Buildout Scenario
Natural Gas Usage (kBTU/Year) 1,192,176 0 1,192,176
Electrical Usage (kWH) 907,007 257,600,000 -256,692,993

Energy – Vehicular Usage

The project traffic engineer estimated that the project would generate 1,214 daily trips (LL&G Engineers, 2023) however, esti mates for the GP Buildout Scenario were not estimated by the Traffic Engineer. Data centers do not generally generate many vehicular trips. For example, a 413,000 SF data center in Santa Clara was found to generate 410 daily trips or approximately 1 trip per 1,000 SF (Ramboll Environ, 2016).

Based on this, a 160,000 SF building would generate as many as 160 trips per day. Therefore, the project would generate more vehicular trip s than would be expected from a GP Buildout scenario where a data center was constructed. Since the GP Buildout scenario would require a Sophia Habl Mitchell
Sophia Mitchell & Associates
P.O. Box 1700
Gualala, CA 95445
Ldn Consulting, Inc.
23811 Washington Ave, C110-333
Murrieta CA 92562
phone 760-473-1253

11/4/2024 22-124 Armorlite Lofts 225 Energy 7
significantly larger electrical usage demand than the proposed project, the additional residential vehicular trips would be insignificant in terms of energy usage.

Furthermore, energy efficiency for vehicles is mandated by State specific policies geared to reduce GHG emissions. For example, in May 2022, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) published rules finalizing revised fuel economy standards for passenger cars and light trucks for 2024-2025 and the standards increase at a rate of 8 percent per year.

Then in 2026 an increase in the efficiency standard by 10 percent would be required. NHTSA estimates that the industry fleet-wide average will be 49 miles per gallon (MPG) in 2026 (NHTSA, 2022).

In July 2023, NHTSA proposed new Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for passenger cars and light trucks built in model years 2027-2032, and new fuel efficiency standards for heavy-duty pickup trucks and va ns built in model years 2030-2035. If finalized, the proposal would require an industry fleet-wide average of approximately 58 miles per gallon for passenger cars and light trucks in MY 2032, by increasing fuel economy by 2 percent year over year for passenger cars and by 4 percent year over year for light trucks (NHTSA, 2023),

In 2015, SB 350 – the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act – was enacted into law. As one of its elements, SB 350 establishes a statewid e policy for widespread electrification of the transportation sector, recognizing that such electrification is required for achievement of the state’s 2030 and 2050 reduction targets (see Pub lic Utilities Code Section 740.12). This was further expanded by requiring 100 percent of all new cars sold in the state by 2035 to be electric (See EO N-79-20 (CARB, 2023)).

The project development would install electric vehicle chargers which would increase the usage of zero emission vehicles and would allow the project to be “ready” and consistent with the states EV regulations and goals. Therefore, a less than significant impact on the energy resources would be expected from the project. The operational modeling of both the project and the GP Buildout scenario are also shown in
Attachments A and -B, respectively.

Conclusion

Based on this analysis, the long-term energy demand during construction and operation of the project would not result in a wast eful or inefficient use of energy. This analysis assumes that the Project would meet all building efficiency requirements for both the State and the City and would be designed to minimize wasteful energy use. This analysis also uses a comparison approach comparing a likely general plan buildout alternative allowed under the General Plan to construct a 160,000 SF data center. Since data ce nters would be a high consumer of electrical energy, the GPA prop osed would utilize significantly less en ergy when compared to the data center allowed by right for the stie. Given this, a less than significant impact under CEQA with respect to Energy Waste is expected and the project would not result in a wasteful or inefficient Sophia Habl Mitchell
Sophia Mitchell & Associates
P.O. Box 1700
Gualala, CA 95445
Ldn Consulting, Inc.
23811 Washington Ave, C110-333
Murrieta CA 92562
phone 760-473-1253

11/4/2024 22-124 Armorlite Lofts 225 Energy 8
use of energy. Furthermore, the project would not conflict with or obstruct the State’s or Local plans for renewable energy or energy efficiency.

Sincerely,
Ldn Consulting, Inc.

Jeremy Louden, Principal

Attachment A: CalEEMod analysis tool (Proposed Project) Attachment B: CalEEMod analysis tool (Proposed GP Buildout Scenario)

Sophia Habl Mitchell
Sophia Mitchell & Associates
P.O. Box 1700
Gualala, CA 95445
Ldn Consulting, Inc.
23811 Washington Ave, C110-333
Murrieta CA 92562
phone 760-473-1253

11/4/2024 22-124 Armorlite Lofts 225 Energy 9
References:

Ascent. (2020). CAP Consistency Guidance Memo.

California Title 24, Part 11. (2022). Retrieved from
https://www.dgs.ca.gov/BSC/Resources/2022-Title-24-California-Code-Changes CARB. (2022). California Greenhouse Gas Emissions for 2000 to 2020. Retrieved from https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic/cc/inventory/2000- 2020_ghg_inventory_trends.pdf
CARB. (2023). https://ww2.arb.ca.gov. Retrieved from California moves to accelerate to 100% new zero-emission vehicle sales by 2035: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/news/california- moves-accelerate-100-new-zero-emission-vehicle-sales-
2035#:~:text=General%20requirements,and%20reach%20100%25%20in%202035.

LL&G Engineers. (2023). LOCAL TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS - ARMORLITE LOFTS.

NHTSA. (2022). https://www.federalregister.gov. Retrieved from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/05/02/2022-07200/corporate- average-fuel-economy-standards-for-model-years-2024-2026-passenger-cars-and-light- trucks
NHTSA. (2023).

Corporate Averge Fuel Economy (CAFE). Retrieved 2023, from https://www.nhtsa.gov/: https://www.nhtsa.gov/laws-regulations/corporate-average- fuel-economy
Ramboll Environ. (2016). Air Qulaity and Greenhouse Gas Techical Report - Vantage Data Centers. Retrieved from
https://www.santaclaraca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/51024/63622859376217 0000
VirginiaTech. (2010). Predicting Tractor Diesel Fuel Consumption. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2631/d1ae4f63bcf1b067e69804f904968f318571.pdf

Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
1 / 47
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2026) - Unmitigated

3.3. Grading (2026) - Unmitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.7. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
2 / 47

3.9. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
3 / 47

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
4 / 47

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
5 / 47

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
6 / 47

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
7 / 47

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Armorlite Lofts
Construction Start Date 1/1/2025
Operational Y ear 2027
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.20
Precipitation (days) 20.4
Location 225 N Las Posas Rd, San Marcos, CA 92069, USA
County San Diego
City San Marcos
Air District San Diego County APCD
Air Basin San Diego
TAZ 6297
EDFZ 12
Electric Utility San Diego Gas & Electric
Gas Utility San Diego Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.21

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area
(sq ft)
Population Description
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
8 / 47
Apartments Mid Rise 165 Dwelling Unit 1.00 158,400 0.25 — 512 — Strip Mall 5.60 1000sqft 0.44 5,600 0.25 — — —
Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator
189 Space 0.50 75,600 0.25 — — —
Parking Lot 65.0 Space 0.50 0.00 0.25 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 13.8 6.29 22.1 0.03 0.08 1.74 1.82 0.08 0.42 0.49 — 4,794 4,794 0.20 0.19 4,863 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 14.3 8.22 31.8 0.07 0.16 9.78 9.94 0.14 3.89 4.03 — 8,831 8,831 0.39 0.61 9,022 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 3.37 3.60 13.2 0.02 0.04 1.37 1.41 0.04 0.42 0.46 — 2,942 2,942 0.13 0.12 2,984 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.61 0.66 2.41 < 0.005 0.01 0.25 0.26 0.01 0.08 0.08 — 487 487 0.02 0.02 494 Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
9 / 47

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Y ear ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 13.8 6.29 22.1 0.03 0.08 1.74 1.82 0.08 0.42 0.49 — 4,794 4,794 0.20 0.19 4,863 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 14.3 8.22 31.8 0.07 0.16 9.78 9.94 0.14 3.89 4.03 — 8,831 8,831 0.39 0.61 9,022 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 3.37 3.60 13.2 0.02 0.04 1.37 1.41 0.04 0.42 0.46 — 2,942 2,942 0.13 0.12 2,984 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 0.61 0.66 2.41 < 0.005 0.01 0.25 0.26 0.01 0.08 0.08 — 487 487 0.02 0.02 494

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 9.73 3.24 42.7 0.07 0.09 6.25 6.34 0.08 1.58 1.67 88.2 7,746 7,834 9.32 0.32 8,186 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 8.24 3.40 28.5 0.07 0.08 6.25 6.33 0.07 1.58 1.66 88.2 7,389 7,477 9.34 0.34 7,814 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
10 / 47
Unmit. 8.87 3.41 34.7 0.07 0.08 6.17 6.25 0.08 1.56 1.64 88.2 7,456 7,544 9.34 0.34 7,889 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.62 0.62 6.34 0.01 0.02 1.13 1.14 0.01 0.29 0.30 14.6 1,234 1,249 1.55 0.06 1,306

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.52 2.82 29.7 0.07 0.05 6.25 6.30 0.05 1.58 1.63 — 7,207 7,207 0.35 0.28 7,322 Area 5.20 0.12 12.9 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 39.6 39.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 39.7 Energy 0.02 0.30 0.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 494 494 0.12 0.01 500 Water — — — — — — — — — — 11.9 5.22 17.1 1.22 0.03 56.5 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 76.3 0.00 76.3 7.63 0.00 267
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.17
Total 9.73 3.24 42.7 0.07 0.09 6.25 6.34 0.08 1.58 1.67 88.2 7,746 7,834 9.32 0.32 8,186 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 4.42 3.10 28.4 0.07 0.05 6.25 6.30 0.05 1.58 1.63 — 6,889 6,889 0.38 0.30 6,989 Area 3.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy 0.02 0.30 0.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 494 494 0.12 0.01 500 Water — — — — — — — — — — 11.9 5.22 17.1 1.22 0.03 56.5 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 76.3 0.00 76.3 7.63 0.00 267
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.17
Total 8.24 3.40 28.5 0.07 0.08 6.25 6.33 0.07 1.58 1.66 88.2 7,389 7,477 9.34 0.34 7,814 Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
11 / 47
————————————————Average
Daily
Mobile 4.37 3.05 28.2 0.07 0.05 6.17 6.22 0.05 1.56 1.61 — 6,937 6,937 0.37 0.30 7,044 Area 4.49 0.06 6.36 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 19.5 19.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 19.6 Energy 0.02 0.30 0.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 494 494 0.12 0.01 500 Water — — — — — — — — — — 11.9 5.22 17.1 1.22 0.03 56.5 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 76.3 0.00 76.3 7.63 0.00 267
Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.17
Total 8.87 3.41 34.7 0.07 0.08 6.17 6.25 0.08 1.56 1.64 88.2 7,456 7,544 9.34 0.34 7,889 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.80 0.56 5.15 0.01 0.01 1.13 1.14 0.01 0.29 0.29 — 1,149 1,149 0.06 0.05 1,166 Area 0.82 0.01 1.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 3.23 3.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.24 Energy < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 81.8 81.8 0.02 < 0.005 82.8 Water — — — — — — — — — — 1.97 0.87 2.84 0.20 < 0.005 9.36 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 12.6 0.00 12.6 1.26 0.00 44.2 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.19
Total 1.62 0.62 6.34 0.01 0.02 1.13 1.14 0.01 0.29 0.30 14.6 1,234 1,249 1.55 0.06 1,306

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
12 / 47
————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.26 1.33 15.0 0.03 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 2,716 2,716 0.11 0.02 2,725 Dust From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — 1.61 1.61 — 0.17 0.17 — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.01 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 22.3 22.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.4 Dust From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.70 3.70 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.71 Dust From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 65.8 65.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 66.7 Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
13 / 47
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.06 3.92 1.46 0.02 0.06 0.77 0.83 0.04 0.21 0.25 — 2,932 2,932 0.15 0.47 3,076 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.55 0.55 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.55 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.1 24.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 25.3 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.09 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.99 3.99 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.19

3.3. Grading (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.23 1.20 14.2 0.02 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 2,455 2,455 0.10 0.02 2,463 Dust From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — 7.09 7.09 — 3.43 3.43 — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
14 / 47
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.07 0.78 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 135 135 0.01 < 0.005 135 Dust From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — 0.39 0.39 — 0.19 0.19 — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.01 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 22.3 22.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 22.3 Dust From
Mater
ial
Movement
— — — — — 0.07 0.07 — 0.03 0.03 — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.04 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 110 110 0.01 < 0.005 111 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.01 0.74 0.28 < 0.005 0.01 0.15 0.16 0.01 0.04 0.05 — 552 552 0.03 0.09 580 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.07 6.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.16 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.3 30.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 31.8 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.00 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.02 Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
15 / 47
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.01 5.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.26

3.5. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.24 3.74 12.8 0.02 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 2,201 2,201 0.09 0.02 2,208 Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.24 3.74 12.8 0.02 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 2,201 2,201 0.09 0.02 2,208 Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.14 2.25 7.69 0.01 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 1,327 1,327 0.05 0.01 1,331 Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.41 1.40 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 220 220 0.01 < 0.005 220 Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
16 / 47
Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.55 0.42 6.59 0.00 0.00 1.29 1.29 0.00 0.30 0.30 — 1,416 1,416 0.07 0.05 1,438 Vendor 0.03 0.98 0.46 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.21 0.01 0.05 0.07 — 760 760 0.03 0.11 795 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.54 0.48 5.81 0.00 0.00 1.29 1.29 0.00 0.30 0.30 — 1,337 1,337 0.07 0.05 1,355 Vendor 0.02 1.02 0.47 0.01 0.01 0.20 0.21 0.01 0.05 0.07 — 761 761 0.03 0.11 794 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.32 0.28 3.54 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.77 0.00 0.18 0.18 — 813 813 0.04 0.03 825 Vendor 0.02 0.61 0.28 < 0.005 0.01 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.03 0.04 — 458 458 0.02 0.07 479 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.05 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 135 135 0.01 0.01 137 Vendor < 0.005 0.11 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 75.9 75.9 < 0.005 0.01 79.3 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
17 / 47
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.13 1.77 8.32 0.01 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 1,244 1,244 0.05 0.01 1,248 Paving 0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.05 0.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 34.1 34.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 34.2 Paving 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.01 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.64 5.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.66 Paving < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.05 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 132 132 0.01 0.01 133 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
18 / 47
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.64 3.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.69 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.60 0.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.61 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 1.07 0.96 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 134 Architectu
r
al
Coatings

12.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 1.07 0.96 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 134 Architectu
r
al
Coatings

12.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
19 / 47
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.23 0.21 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 29.3 29.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 29.4 Architectu
r
al
Coatings

2.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 4.84 4.84 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.86 Architectu
r
al
Coatings

0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.11 0.08 1.32 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 283 283 0.01 0.01 288 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.11 0.10 1.16 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.06 0.06 — 267 267 0.01 0.01 271 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 59.1 59.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 60.0 Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
20 / 47
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.79 9.79 < 0.005 < 0.005 9.94 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartment
s
Mid
Rise

3.65 2.23 23.4 0.06 0.04 4.88 4.93 0.04 1.24 1.28 — 5,642 5,642 0.28 0.22 5,732 Strip Mall 0.87 0.59 6.26 0.02 0.01 1.36 1.37 0.01 0.35 0.36 — 1,565 1,565 0.07 0.06 1,590 Enclosed
P
arking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 4.52 2.82 29.7 0.07 0.05 6.25 6.30 0.05 1.58 1.63 — 7,207 7,207 0.35 0.28 7,322 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
21 / 47
Apartment
Mid
Rise

3.57 2.45 22.4 0.05 0.04 4.88 4.93 0.04 1.24 1.28 — 5,393 5,393 0.30 0.24 5,472 Strip Mall 0.85 0.65 5.91 0.01 0.01 1.36 1.37 0.01 0.35 0.36 — 1,496 1,496 0.08 0.06 1,517 Enclosed
P
arking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 4.42 3.10 28.4 0.07 0.05 6.25 6.30 0.05 1.58 1.63 — 6,889 6,889 0.38 0.30 6,989 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartment
s
Mid
Rise

0.64 0.44 4.08 0.01 0.01 0.88 0.89 0.01 0.22 0.23 — 899 899 0.05 0.04 913 Strip Mall 0.15 0.12 1.08 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.25 0.25 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 — 249 249 0.01 0.01 253 Enclosed
P
arking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.80 0.56 5.15 0.01 0.01 1.13 1.14 0.01 0.29 0.29 — 1,149 1,149 0.06 0.05 1,166

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
22 / 47

72.20.010.0569.169.1———————————Apartment
s
Mid Rise
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 6.10 6.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.37 Enclosed
P
arking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 34.5 34.5 0.03 < 0.005 36.0
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.36 2.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.46
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 112 112 0.08 0.01 117
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartment
s
Mid
Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 69.1 69.1 0.05 0.01 72.2
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 6.10 6.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.37 Enclosed
P
arking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 34.5 34.5 0.03 < 0.005 36.0
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.36 2.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.46
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 112 112 0.08 0.01 117
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartment
s
Mid
Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — 11.4 11.4 0.01 < 0.005 12.0
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — 1.01 1.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.05 Enclosed
P
arking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — — 5.71 5.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.96
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
23 / 47

0.41< 0.005< 0.0050.390.39———————————Parking
Lot
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 18.6 18.6 0.01 < 0.005 19.4

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartment
s
Mid
Rise

0.02 0.29 0.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 374 374 0.03 < 0.005 375 Strip Mall < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.77 7.77 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.79 Enclosed
P
arking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.02 0.30 0.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 382 382 0.03 < 0.005 383 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartment
s
Mid
Rise

0.02 0.29 0.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 374 374 0.03 < 0.005 375 Strip Mall < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.77 7.77 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.79 Enclosed
P
arking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
24 / 47
Total 0.02 0.30 0.13 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 382 382 0.03 < 0.005 383 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartment
s
Mid
Rise
< 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 62.0 62.0 0.01 < 0.005 62.1 Strip Mall < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.29 1.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.29 Enclosed
P
arking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total < 0.005 0.06 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 63.3 63.3 0.01 < 0.005 63.4

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Consumer
Products

3.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
r
al
Coatings

0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipmen
t

1.40 0.12 12.9 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 39.6 39.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 39.7 Total 5.20 0.12 12.9 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 0.00 39.6 39.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 39.7 Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
25 / 47
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Consumer
Products

3.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
r
al
Coatings

0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 3.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Hearths 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Consumer
Products

0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architectu
r
al
Coatings

0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipmen
t

0.13 0.01 1.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 3.23 3.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.24 Total 0.82 0.01 1.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 0.00 3.23 3.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 3.24

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
26 / 47

52.70.031.1416.04.8811.1——————————Apartment
s
Mid Rise
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — 0.79 0.35 1.14 0.08 < 0.005 3.77 Enclosed
P
arking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 Total — — — — — — — — — — 11.9 5.22 17.1 1.22 0.03 56.5 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartment
s
Mid
Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 11.1 4.88 16.0 1.14 0.03 52.7
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — 0.79 0.35 1.14 0.08 < 0.005 3.77 Enclosed
P
arking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 Total — — — — — — — — — — 11.9 5.22 17.1 1.22 0.03 56.5 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartment
s
Mid
Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 1.84 0.81 2.65 0.19 < 0.005 8.73
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — 0.13 0.06 0.19 0.01 < 0.005 0.62 Enclosed
P
arking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
27 / 47
< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.005< 0.0050.00——————————Parking Lot
Total — — — — — — — — — — 1.97 0.87 2.84 0.20 < 0.005 9.36

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartment
s
Mid
Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 73.1 0.00 73.1 7.31 0.00 256
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — 3.17 0.00 3.17 0.32 0.00 11.1 Enclosed
P
arking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 76.3 0.00 76.3 7.63 0.00 267
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartment
s
Mid
Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 73.1 0.00 73.1 7.31 0.00 256
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — 3.17 0.00 3.17 0.32 0.00 11.1 Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
28 / 47

0.000.000.000.000.000.00——————————Enclosed
P
arking
with
Elevator
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 76.3 0.00 76.3 7.63 0.00 267
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartment
s
Mid
Rise
— — — — — — — — — — 12.1 0.00 12.1 1.21 0.00 42.4
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.05 0.00 1.84 Enclosed
P
arking
with
Elevator
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 12.6 0.00 12.6 1.26 0.00 44.2

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartment
s
Mid
Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.13
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.03
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.17
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
29 / 47
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartment
s
Mid
Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.13
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.03
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1.17
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Apartment
s
Mid
Rise
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.19
Strip Mall — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.01
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.19

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipmen
t
T
ype
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
30 / 47

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipmen
t
T
ype
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipmen
t
T
ype
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
31 / 47
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetation ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
32 / 47
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequester
ed
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequester
ed
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
33 / 47
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequester
ed
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/1/2026 1/5/2026 5.00 3.00 — Grading Grading 1/4/2026 2/1/2026 5.00 20.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 2/2/2026 12/4/2026 5.00 220 — Paving Paving 11/14/2026 11/27/2026 5.00 10.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/15/2026 12/04/2026 5.00 80.0 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Graders Diesel Tier 4 Final 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Site Preparation Scrapers Diesel Tier 4 Final 1.00 8.00 423 0.48 Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
34 / 47

0.3784.07.001.00Tier 4 FinalDieselSite Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backh oes
Grading Graders Diesel Tier 4 Final 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Final 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Final 2.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Crushing/Proc.

Equipment
Diesel Tier 4 Final 1.00 6.00 310 0.41
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Tier 4 Final 1.00 8.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Tier 4 Final 2.00 7.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Tier 4 Final 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Final 1.00 6.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Tier 4 Final 3.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Tier 4 Final 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Pavers Diesel Tier 4 Final 1.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Tier 4 Final 1.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Tier 4 Final 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Paving Cement and Mortar
Mix
ers
Diesel Tier 4 Final 1.00 8.00 10.0 0.56
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 7.50 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 7.63 HHDT,MHDT
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
35 / 47
Site Preparation Hauling 41.7 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 12.5 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 7.63 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 7.85 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 152 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 30.9 7.63 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 15.0 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 7.63 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 30.5 12.0 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 7.63 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
36 / 47

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq
ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq
ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 320,760 106,920 9,380 2,909 2,614

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Cubic Y ards) Material Exported (Cubic Y ards) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Site Preparation — 1,000 4.50 0.00 —
Grading — 1,250 5.00 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Apartments Mid Rise — 0%
Strip Mall 0.00 0%
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.50 100%
Parking Lot 0.50 100%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Y ear and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Y ear kWh per Y ear CO2 CH4 N2O
2026 0.00 45.1 0.03 < 0.005
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
37 / 47

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Y ear VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Y ear Apartments Mid Rise 990 990 990 361,350 6,916 6,916 6,916 2,524,178 Strip Mall 224 224 224 81,760 1,930 1,930 1,930 704,309 Enclosed Parking
with
Elevator

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated
Hearth Type Unmitigated (number)
Apartments Mid Rise —
Wood Fireplaces 0
Gas Fireplaces 0
Propane Fireplaces 0
Electric Fireplaces 0
No Fireplaces 165
Conventional Wood Stoves 0
Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Non-Catalytic Wood Stoves 0
Pellet Wood Stoves 0
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
38 / 47

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq
ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
320760 106,920 9,380 2,909 2,614

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Apartments Mid Rise 559,494 45.1 0.0330 0.0040 1,167,942 Strip Mall 49,362 45.1 0.0330 0.0040 24,234
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 279,072 45.1 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 Parking Lot 19,079 45.1 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Apartments Mid Rise 5,796,957 4.57
Strip Mall 414,806 3.74
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 3.74
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
39 / 47
Parking Lot 0.00 3.74

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Apartments Mid Rise 136 —
Strip Mall 5.88 —
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Apartments Mid Rise Average room A/C &
Other
residential A/C
and heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 2.50 2.50 10.0
Apartments Mid Rise Household refrigerators
and/or
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.12 0.60 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Other commercial A/C
and
heat pumps
R-410A 2,088 < 0.005 4.00 4.00 18.0
Strip Mall Stand-alone retail
refr
igerators and
freezers
R-134a 1,430 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00
Strip Mall Walk-in refrigerators
and
freezers
R-404A 3,922 < 0.005 7.50 7.50 20.0

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
40 / 47

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Y ear Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
41 / 47

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions
will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 11.0 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 3.95 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise — meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 7.44 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed histor
ical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full da
y or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (Radke et al., 2017, CEC-500-2017-008), and consider in
undation location and depth for the San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta and California coast resulting different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events.

Users may select from four scenarios to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four scenarios are: No rise, 0.5 meter, 1.0 meter, 1.41 meters Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, v
egetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
42 / 47
Sea Level Rise 1 0 0 N/A
Wildfire 1 0 0 N/A
Flooding 0 0 0 N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest e
xposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the g
reatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise 1 1 1 2
Wildfire 1 1 1 2
Flooding 1 1 1 2
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack Reduction N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality Degradation N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest e
xposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the g
reatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
43 / 47

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 42.6
AQ-PM 28.1
AQ-DPM 76.8
Drinking Water 24.2
Lead Risk Housing 39.5
Pesticides 35.7
Toxic Releases 27.8
Traffic 61.5
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 78.6
Groundwater 67.5
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 82.7
Impaired Water Bodies 43.8
Solid Waste 96.6
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 3.22
Cardio-vascular 14.1
Low Birth Weights 40.5
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 78.3
Housing 82.8
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
44 / 47
Linguistic 77.9
Poverty 78.2
Unemployment 36.4

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 14.57718465
Employed 17.95200821
Median HI 15.05196972
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 34.96727833
High school enrollment 100
Preschool enrollment 1.873476197
Transportation —
Auto Access 7.878865649
Active commuting 68.52303349
Social —
2-parent households 81.04709355
Voting 41.66559733
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 17.16925446
Park access 56.96137559
Retail density 84.51174131
Supermarket access 77.74926216
Tree canopy 38.40626203
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
45 / 47
Housing —
Homeownership 8.623123316
Housing habitability 19.36353137
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 79.81521879 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 64.18580778
Uncrowded housing 31.19466188
Health Outcomes —
Insured adults 5.902733222
Arthritis 9.2
Asthma ER Admissions 99.1
High Blood Pressure 21.8
Cancer (excluding skin) 21.2
Asthma 30.0
Coronary Heart Disease 3.1
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 5.5
Diagnosed Diabetes 18.3
Life Expectancy at Birth 13.9
Cognitively Disabled 11.9
Physically Disabled 7.5
Heart Attack ER Admissions 99.6
Mental Health Not Good 25.4
Chronic Kidney Disease 2.7
Obesity 34.9
Pedestrian Injuries 81.7
Physical Health Not Good 17.6
Stroke 5.6
Health Risk Behaviors —
Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
46 / 47
Binge Drinking 68.3
Current Smoker 35.6
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 16.4
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 16.3
Elderly 23.2
English Speaking 15.1
Foreign-born 80.3
Outdoor Workers 11.8
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 47.4
Traffic Density 77.2
Traffic Access 23.0
Other Indices —
Hardship 72.9
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 49.7

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 59.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 15.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) No Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) Y es Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No Armorlite Lofts Detailed Report, 3/1/2024
47 / 47
a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health & Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures
No Health & Equity Custom Measures created.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Total Area is 2.44 acres - 254 Parking Spaces
Construction: Construction Phases Estimated Construction Schedule Construction: Off-Road Equipment Design Feature to use Tier 4 final equipment Operations: Vehicle Data Updated to reflect the TS
Operations: Hearths no hearth options installed
Construction: Off-Road Equipment EF crusher equipment similar to scraper equipment and was updated since no defaults were provided by CalEEMod
Construction: Dust From Material Movement Updated to reflect PD data center scenario Custom Report, 2/28/2024
1 / 16
data center scenario Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
data center scenario Custom Report, 2/28/2024
2 / 16

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources
data center scenario Custom Report, 2/28/2024
3 / 16

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data
data center scenario Custom Report, 2/28/2024
4 / 16

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name data center scenario
Construction Start Date 1/1/2026
Operational Y ear 2026
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.20
Precipitation (days) 9.80
Location San Marcos, CA, USA
County San Diego
City San Marcos
Air District San Diego County APCD
Air Basin San Diego
TAZ 6215
EDFZ 12
Electric Utility San Diego Gas & Electric
Gas Utility San Diego Gas & Electric
App Version 2022.1.1.21

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area
(sq ft)
Population Description
data center scenario Custom Report, 2/28/2024
5 / 16
Unrefrigerated
W
arehouse-Rail
160 1000sqft 3.67 160,000 1,000 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.94 5.41 0.51 11.6 0.01 0.02 0.97 0.99 0.02 0.25 0.26 152 1,226 1,378 15.5 0.22 3.80 1,835 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.69 4.26 0.49 4.39 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.98 0.01 0.25 0.25 152 1,147 1,299 15.5 0.22 0.10 1,753 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.29 4.81 0.51 7.81 0.01 0.01 0.96 0.98 0.01 0.24 0.26 152 1,169 1,321 15.5 0.22 1.64 1,776 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.24 0.88 0.09 1.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 25.2 193 219 2.56 0.04 0.27 294

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e data center scenario Custom Report, 2/28/2024
6 / 16
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.70 0.64 0.45 4.64 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.98 0.01 0.25 0.25 — 1,134 1,134 0.05 0.04 3.80 1,152 Area 1.24 4.77 0.06 6.96 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 28.6 28.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 28.7 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 31.8 31.8 0.02 < 0.005 — 33.3 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 70.9 31.1 102 7.29 0.18 — 337 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 81.1 0.00 81.1 8.10 0.00 — 284 Total 1.94 5.41 0.51 11.6 0.01 0.02 0.97 0.99 0.02 0.25 0.26 152 1,226 1,378 15.5 0.22 3.80 1,835 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.69 0.63 0.49 4.39 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.98 0.01 0.25 0.25 — 1,084 1,084 0.06 0.05 0.10 1,099 Area — 3.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 31.8 31.8 0.02 < 0.005 — 33.3 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 70.9 31.1 102 7.29 0.18 — 337 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 81.1 0.00 81.1 8.10 0.00 — 284 Total 0.69 4.26 0.49 4.39 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.98 0.01 0.25 0.25 152 1,147 1,299 15.5 0.22 0.10 1,753 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.68 0.62 0.49 4.38 0.01 0.01 0.96 0.97 0.01 0.24 0.25 — 1,092 1,092 0.06 0.05 1.64 1,108 Area 0.61 4.19 0.03 3.43 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.1 14.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.2 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 31.8 31.8 0.02 < 0.005 — 33.3 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 70.9 31.1 102 7.29 0.18 — 337 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 81.1 0.00 81.1 8.10 0.00 — 284 Total 1.29 4.81 0.51 7.81 0.01 0.01 0.96 0.98 0.01 0.24 0.26 152 1,169 1,321 15.5 0.22 1.64 1,776 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.12 0.11 0.09 0.80 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 — 181 181 0.01 0.01 0.27 183 Area 0.11 0.76 0.01 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.34 2.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.34 data center scenario Custom Report, 2/28/2024
7 / 16
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 5.27 5.27 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.51 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 11.7 5.15 16.9 1.21 0.03 — 55.7 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 13.4 0.00 13.4 1.34 0.00 — 47.0 Total 0.24 0.88 0.09 1.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 25.2 193 219 2.56 0.04 0.27 294

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
r
ated
Warehou
se-Rail

0.70 0.64 0.45 4.64 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.98 0.01 0.25 0.25 — 1,134 1,134 0.05 0.04 3.80 1,152 Total 0.70 0.64 0.45 4.64 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.98 0.01 0.25 0.25 — 1,134 1,134 0.05 0.04 3.80 1,152 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
r
ated
Warehou
se-Rail

0.69 0.63 0.49 4.39 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.98 0.01 0.25 0.25 — 1,084 1,084 0.06 0.05 0.10 1,099 Total 0.69 0.63 0.49 4.39 0.01 0.01 0.97 0.98 0.01 0.25 0.25 — 1,084 1,084 0.06 0.05 0.10 1,099 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
data center scenario Custom Report, 2/28/2024
8 / 16
1830.270.010.01181181—0.050.04< 0.0050.180.18< 0.005< 0.0050.800.090.110.12Unrefrige r
ated
Warehou
Total 0.12 0.11 0.09 0.80 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.18 0.18 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 — 181 181 0.01 0.01 0.27 183

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
r
ated
Warehou
se-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 31.8 31.8 0.02 < 0.005 — 33.3
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 31.8 31.8 0.02 < 0.005 — 33.3 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
r
ated
Warehou
se-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 31.8 31.8 0.02 < 0.005 — 33.3
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 31.8 31.8 0.02 < 0.005 — 33.3 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
r
ated
Warehou
se-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 5.27 5.27 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.51 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 5.27 5.27 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.51 data center scenario Custom Report, 2/28/2024
9 / 16

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
r
ated
Warehou
se-Rail

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
r
ated
Warehou
se-Rail

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
r
ated
Warehou
se-Rail

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e data center scenario Custom Report, 2/28/2024
10 / 16
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 3.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ur
al
Coatings
— 0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

1.24 1.14 0.06 6.96 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 28.6 28.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 28.7 Total 1.24 4.77 0.06 6.96 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 28.6 28.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 28.7 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 3.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ur
al
Coatings
— 0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — 3.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ur
al
Coatings
— 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.11 0.10 0.01 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.34 2.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.34 Total 0.11 0.76 0.01 0.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.34 2.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.34 data center scenario Custom Report, 2/28/2024
11 / 16

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
r
ated
Warehou
se-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 70.9 31.1 102 7.29 0.18 — 337
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 70.9 31.1 102 7.29 0.18 — 337 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
r
ated
Warehou
se-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 70.9 31.1 102 7.29 0.18 — 337
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 70.9 31.1 102 7.29 0.18 — 337 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
r
ated
Warehou
se-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 11.7 5.15 16.9 1.21 0.03 — 55.7
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 11.7 5.15 16.9 1.21 0.03 — 55.7

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) data center scenario Custom Report, 2/28/2024
12 / 16
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
r
ated
Warehou
se-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 81.1 0.00 81.1 8.10 0.00 — 284
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 81.1 0.00 81.1 8.10 0.00 — 284 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
r
ated
Warehou
se-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 81.1 0.00 81.1 8.10 0.00 — 284
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 81.1 0.00 81.1 8.10 0.00 — 284 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
r
ated
Warehou
se-Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 13.4 0.00 13.4 1.34 0.00 — 47.0
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 13.4 0.00 13.4 1.34 0.00 — 47.0

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
data center scenario Custom Report, 2/28/2024
13 / 16
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
T
ype
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) data center scenario Custom Report, 2/28/2024
14 / 16
Equipme
T
ype
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
T
ype
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
data center scenario Custom Report, 2/28/2024
15 / 16

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Y ear VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Y ear Unrefrigerated
W
arehouse-Rail
160 160 160 58,400 1,371 1,371 1,371 500,443

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq
ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 240,000 80,000 —

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 180

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-Rail 257,600 45.1 0.0330 0.0040 0.00 data center scenario Custom Report, 2/28/2024
16 / 16

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-Rail 37,000,000 14,944

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-Rail 150 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Operations: Energy Use per data center
Operations: Vehicle Data Data Center Trip Generation based on 413,000 SF Data Center (Romboll Environ, 2016) See Source in
Report
Construction: Construction Phases construction emission not calculated