Agenda packet — San Marino City Council, June 10, 2026

AGENDA – JUNE 10, 2026 PAGE 1 of 341

CITY OF SAN MARINO

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
www.SanMarinoCA.gov
(626) 300-0700 Phone
City Hall Council Chamber
2200 Huntington Drive
San Marino, CA 91108

REGULAR MEETING OF THE

SAN MARINO CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 10, 2026 AT 6:00 PM

CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
2200 HUNTINGTON DRIVE
SAN MARINO, CA 91108
AND

HYATT CENTRIC GINZA
6 CHOME-6-7 GINZA, CHUO CITY,
TOKYO 104-0061, JAPAN
The City of San Marino appreciates your attendance. Citizens’ interest provides the Council with valuable information regarding issues of the community.

Regular meetings are held on the 2nd Wednesday of every month at 6:00 p.m. Typically, adjourned meetings are held on the last Friday of every month at 8:30 a.m.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a reasonable modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the City Clerk via email at [email protected] or by phone at (626) 300-0705 48 hours prior to the meeting for assistance.

The public is welcome to attend the meeting in person or remotely via Zoom, however, the meeting will proceed as normal even if there are technical difficulties with Zoom. The City will do it’s best to resolve any technical issues as quickly as possible.

How to view or listen to the meeting from home:

Visit www.SanMarinoCA.gov/Zoom
AGENDA – JUNE 10, 2026 PAGE 2 of 341
How to offer public comment from home:

Public comment will be accepted by email to [email protected] until 3:00 p.m. the day before the meeting. Written public comment received by 3:00 p.m. will be distributed to City Council during the meeting. Any comments received after 3:00 p.m. will be included in the public comment record but not provided to City Council at the meeting.

Written public comment will be accepted electronically via the zoom.us teleconference module during the meeting. Written Zoom comments will be accepted after the in-person comments. Written Zoom comments will be read or summarized, then printed and made part of the public record for the meeting.

CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL
Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo, Mayor Chou

POSTING OF AGENDA
The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting at the following locations: City Hall, 2200 Huntington Drive, the Crowell Public Library, 1890 Huntington Drive, and the Stoneman Building, 1560 Pasqualito Drive. The agenda is also posted on the City’s website:
https://www.SanMarinoCA.gov.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
The City welcomes public input. Members of the public may address the City Council by completing a public comment card and giving it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. At this time, the public may address the City Council on items that are not on the agenda.

Pursuant to state law, the City Council may not discuss or take action on issues not on the meeting agenda (Government Code Section 54954.2). The Mayor reserves the right to place limits on duration of comments. Staff may be asked to follow up on such items.

CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
This is an opportunity for the City Manager to inform the City Council and the public of any upcoming events or matters of interest to the community.

PRESENTATION

PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES OF RECOGNITION FOR OUTGOING AGENDA – JUNE 10, 2026 PAGE 3 of 341

ADVISORY BODY MEMBERS

PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DECISION TO DENY DESIGN REVIEW CASE NO. DR 22-26 AT 535 OLD MILL ROAD TO THE DEMOLISH AN EXISTING 1,751 SQUAREFOOT RESIDENCE AND CONSTRUCT A NEW TWO-STORY 2,690

SQUARE-FOOT RESIDENCE WITH A DETACHED TWO-CAR GARAGE
(CHAN)
Recommendation: Based on the information submitted to the record, staff recommends that the City Council: (1) determine that based on the whole of the administrative record, that the proposed addition is exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1 & Class 3, and that there is no substantial evidence demonstrating an exception to the categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 applies; (2) find that the proposed project meets the required findings; and (3) approve the project. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to adopt City Council Resolution No. R-26-21 approving the project as presented and find that the proposed project meets the required findings and determine that based on the whole of the administrative record, that the proposed addition is exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1 & Class 3, and that there is no substantial evidence demonstrating an exception to the categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 applies.”
If the City Council affirms the adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. PCR 26-17, the appropriate motion would be:
“I move to adopt City Council Resolution No. R-26-21 affirming the adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. PCR 26-17 to deny Design Review Case Number DR-22-26 at 535 Old Mill Road to demolish an existing 1,751 sq ft single-family residence and construct a 2,690 sq ft two-story residence with a detached 2-car garage.”

NEW BUSINESS

2. APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS PERTAINING TO THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2026 Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council adopt: (1) Resolution No. R-26- 15 calling and giving notice of the holding of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, for the election of certain officers as required by the provisions of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law Cities and AGENDA – JUNE 10, 2026 PAGE 4 of 341
requesting the Registrar of Voters of the County of Los Angeles to conduct said election; (2) Resolution No. R-26-16 requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles to render services to the City relating to the conduct of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026; (3) Resolution No. R-26-17 adopting regulations for candidates for elective office pertaining to candidates’ statements submitted to the voters at an election to be held on November 3, 2026; and (4) direct staff to return to a future City Council meeting with the necessary documents and ballot language to consider placing the City’s expiring Utility Users Tax on the November 3, 2026 ballot. If the Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to (1) adopt Resolution No. R-26-15, calling and giving notice of the holding of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026; (2) Resolution No. R-26-16, requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles to render services to the City relating to the conduct of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026; (3) Resolution No. R-26-17, adopting regulations for candidates for elective office pertaining to candidates’ statements submitted to the voters at the election to be held on November 3, 2026; and (4) direct staff to return to a future City Council meeting with the necessary documents and ballot language to consider placing the City’s expiring Utility Users Tax on the November 3, 2026 ballot.”

3. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. R-26-07 ADOPTING PROCEDURES REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953.4 (SB 707)

PERTAINING TO DISRUPTION OF TELEPHONIC OR INTERNET

SERVICE
Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council adopt Resolution No. R-26-07 Adopting Procedures Required by Government Code Section 54953.4 (SB 707) Pertaining to Disruption of Telephonic or Internet Service. If the Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to adopt Resolution No. R-26-07 Adopting Procedures Required by Government Code Section 54953.4 (SB 707) Pertaining to Disruption of Telephonic or Internet Service.”

CONSENT CALENDAR

4. APPROVE A PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT WITH TRI-TECH
RESTORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $808,953.79 FOR WINDSTORMRELATED ROOF REPAIRS TO CITY FACILITIES AND AUTHORIZE THE

PARKS, AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE

AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY, AND AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC

WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER TO APPROVE CONTRACT CHANGE

ORDERS NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT,

SUBJECT TO CONCURRENCE BY THE CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS

INSURANCE AUTHORITY (CJPIA), WITH ALL ASSOCIATED COSTS

FUNDED BY CJPIA
AGENDA – JUNE 10, 2026 PAGE 5 of 341
Recommendation: Staff recommend that the City Council (1) approve a Public Works Agreement with Tri-Tech Restoration in the amount of $808,953.79 for roof repairs at Lacy Park and City Hall and (2) authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City, and (3) authorize the Parks and Public Works Director/City Engineer to approve contract change orders necessary for the completion of the project, subject to concurrence by CJPIA, with all costs to be paid by CJPIA as outlined in the agreement. If the Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to (1) approve a Public Works Agreement with Tri-Tech Restoration in the amount of $808,953.79 for windstorm-related roof repairs to City facilities, (2) authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City, and (3) authorize the Parks and Public Works Director/City Engineer to approve contract change orders necessary for the completion of the project, subject to concurrence by the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA), with all costs funded by CJPIA.”

5. REPORT ON EMERGENCY ACTIONS TAKEN TO REPAIR/REMEDIATE FIRE STATION 91 AND REQUEST TO EXTEND EMERGENCY

PROCUREMENT PURSUANT TO PUBLIC CONTRACTS CODE SECTION
22050 AND SAN MARINO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.06.05(A)(8) Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council receive the report of repair/remediation actions undertaken to date and extend the emergency by a 4/5 vote to facilitate expeditious restoration of Fire Station 91. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
"I move to receive and file the report of repair/remediation actions undertaken to date and to extend the emergency action approved in Resolution No. R-26-08 to facilitate the expeditious restoration of Fire Station 91."

6. RECEIVE AND FILE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS REPORT FOR MAY 2026
Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council receive and file the Monthly Disbursements Report for the month of May 2026. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to receive and file the Monthly Disbursements Report for the month of May 2026.”

7. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council approve the May 2026 Minutes. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of May 13, 2026, the Regular Meeting of May 13, 2026, and the Adjourned Regular Meeting of May 29, 2026.” AGENDA – JUNE 10, 2026 PAGE 6 of 341

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS OR PUBLIC WRITINGS DISTRIBUTION
This is an opportunity to announce any written communications pertaining to the City received by members of the City Council. All public writings distributed by the City of San Marino to at least a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available at the Public Counter at City Hall located at 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino, California 91108, and will also be included in the public agenda packet that will available for review at the City Council meeting.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

ADJOURNMENT
Posted: 06/05/2026 ALISON WALKER

CITY CLERK
City Manager’s Report and
Operational Dashboard
June 10, 2026
PAGE 7 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
84 90 102
98 87 101 98
67 97 87 101
0 50
100
150
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
In-City Incidents
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
84 78 81 85 85
70 90
81 96
77 103
-10
40 90
140
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Out-of-City Incidents
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
Fire
Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 1,080 Current Fiscal Year-to-Date Total: 1,012 Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 994 Current Fiscal Year-to-Date Total: 930 PAGE 8 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
0 2
1 2
1 0 0
2 1 1 1
0 1
2 3
4 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Emergency Medical Services - Cardiac Arrests
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0
0 1
2 3
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Emergency Medical Services - Return of Spontaneous
Circulation
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
Fire
Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 14 Current Fiscal Year-to-Date Total: 11 Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 2 Current Fiscal Year-to-Date Total: 1 PAGE 9 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
0:01:09 0:01:10 0:01:00 0:01:08 0:01:17 0:01:13
0:00:59 0:00:48
0:01:08 0:01:15 0:01:07
0:00:00
0:00:43
0:01:26
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
90th Percentile Response Time: EMS Turnout
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
0:01:40 0:01:17 0:01:04 0:01:01
0:01:29 0:01:16 0:00:56
0:01:25 0:01:25
0:01:21
0:02:12
0:00:00
0:01:26
0:02:53
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
90th Percentile Response Time: Fire Turnout
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
0:06:12 0:06:31 0:05:53 0:06:28 0:05:58 0:06:18 0:05:52 0:05:49 0:06:27 0:05:03
0:06:23
0:02:53
0:07:12
0:11:31
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
90th Percentile Response Time: Overall Response
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
The San Marino Fire Department has adopted the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1710 standards for response time reporting. NFPA standards represent aspirational goals for Fire Departments. By measuring response in percentiles rather than averages, the Fire Department is able to more accurately measure performance of responding units. The time reported as the 90th percentile turnout or response time means that 90% of incidents were as fast, or faster, than the reported time.

Fire
Fiscal Year 24-25 Response Rate: 1 min 3 sec Current Fiscal Year Response Rate: 1 min 07 sec Fiscal Year 24-25 Response Rate: 1 min 16 sec Current Fiscal Year Response Rate: 1 min 22 sec Fiscal Year 24-25 Response Rate: 6 min 2 sec Current Fiscal Year Response Rate: 6 min 05 sec Turnout Time - the amount of time after dispatch for firefighters to don safety equipment and start vehicle response.

Overall Response Time - the total amount of time it takes to respond to an incident, from initial dispatch to arriving on scene.

PAGE 10 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
5 4
2 6 6
3 1
2 2
0 0 2
5 10
15 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Residential Burglaries
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
9 9 9
7 8
4 10
8 4 4
5 0
5 10
15 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Larcenies
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
Police
Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 79 Current Year-to-Date Total: 33 Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 113 Current Year-to-Date Total: 77 Burglary - the act of entering a premise with the intent of committing a felony or stealing property.

Larceny - the unlawful removal of property. Any person who feloniously steals, takes, carries, leads or drives away the personal property of another is guilty of larceny theft by either misdemeanor of felony larceny.

PAGE 11 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
129 129 103
143
240
123
267 255
216 194
215
0 100
200
300
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Traffic Citations Issued
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
1 3
10 12
0 1
3 5
4 7
0 3
5 10
15 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June
Community Meetings
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 1,619 Current Year-to-Date Total: 2,014 Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 63 Current Year-to-Date Total: 49 Police
PAGE 12 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
90 77 82 85
46 94 97
62 109
80 74
0 50
100
150
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Building Permits Issued
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
5 3
8 7
3 7
4 4
3 6
7 0
5 10
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Tree Removal Permits Issued
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
4 3 2 1
6 1
4 6
9 12
8 0
10 20
30 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
New Business Licenses
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
Community Development
Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 988 Current Year-to-Date Total: 896 Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 49 Current Year-to-Date Total: 57 Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 80 Current Year-to-Date Total: 56 PAGE 13 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
0 2
5 4
1 4 4
2 4
5 1
0 5
10 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
ADU Permits Issued
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
3 4
3 8 4
6 3
5 4
0 2
0 5
10 15
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
ADU Applications Submitted
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
57 54 66 58 59 50 48 43
57 59
46 0
50 100
150
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Open Code Enforcement Cases
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
Community Development
Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 34 Current Year-to-Date Total: 32 Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 54 Current Year-to-Date Total: 42 Fiscal Year 24-25 Average per Month: 71 Current Year-to-Date Average per Month: 54 PAGE 14 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
61 33
79 57
37 34
109
53 112
53 34
0 50
100
150
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Programs Offered
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
12602
3514
1443
3573
677 1788 1636 2003 1413
4611
1167
0 5,000
10,000
15,000
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Participants
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
27 29 36
48 36
21 24 34 43 36
57 0
20 40
60 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Rental Bookings
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
Community Services
Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 720 Current Year-to-Date Total: 662 Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 35,707 Current Year-to-Date Total: 34,427 Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 346 Current Year-to-Date Total: 391 PAGE 15 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
15,875 16,829 15,335 14,040 14,738 13,071
15,958 13,845 15,994
15,994
15,219
0 10,000
20,000
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Library Circulation Total
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
14,175 15,142 13,806 12,529 13,219 11,394
14,272 12,481 14,451 13,941 13541
1,700 1,687
1,529
1,511 1,519
1,677
1,686
1,364
1,543 1,575 1678
0 5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
FY 2024-25 Library Circulation Breakdown
In-Person Digital
Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 167,719 Current Year-to-Date Total: 166,898 Community Services
PAGE 16 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
$1,449,398
$1,384,033 $1,008,566
$1,811,878
$1,308,581
$10,528,918
$4,683,183
$2,119,314
$2,357,641
$8,886,778
$4,829,263
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Revenues
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
$6,124,364
$2,736,603
$2,404,470
$3,196,598
$2,106,183
$3,133,828
$2,954,733
$2,320,591
$2,869,207
$2,180,814
$2,372,858
$0
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Expenses
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
$5,132 $2,084 $905 $2,450 $1,578 $2,614 $1,367 $1,701 $9,247 $5,268 $2,652 $14,686
$42,214 $53,380
$100,531
$58,872 $43,569
$130,787
$29,914 $52,717 $70,964 $40,864
$39,269
$135,286
$80,912
$58,339
$69,230 $75,500 $96,442 $66,337 $73,233 $73,407 $57,030 $0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
$300,000
$350,000
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Overtime Expenses
FY 24-25 FY 25-26 Police Department Fire Department
Finance
Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: $40,596,077 Year-to-Date Total: $40,267,553 Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: $46,255,179 Year-to-Date Total: $32,400,249 Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: $1,761,786 Year-to-Date Total: $1,498,480 PAGE 17 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
$15,519,219
$13,084,337
$13,111,117
$11,632,506
$10,237,280
$16,503,283
$17,962,856
$16,316,206
$14,690,307
$15,509,776
$25,146,594
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
General Fund Balance at End of Each Month
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
$29,036,784
$27,945,761
$26,345,855
$24,401,896
$23,558,742
$30,553,261
$32,900,183
$33,247,400
$30,984,162
$37,566,981
$39,943,568
$0
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
$35,000,000
$40,000,000
$45,000,000
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Overall Cash Balance in the Bank at End of Each Month
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
Finance
PAGE 18 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
99 98 97 99 99 101 101 100 100 101
104
90 100
110
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Full-Time Employees (111 budgeted)
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
64 65 60 58 57 57 56 54 54 62 63
0 50
100
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Part-Time Employees
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
Note: For Fiscal Year 2025-26, 111 full-time positions were budgeted by the City Council rather than 112 in the previous year. One full-time police officer position was frozen due to hiring challenges and budget limitations.

Fiscal Year 24-25 Average: 105 Current Year-to-Date Average: 100 Human Resources
Fiscal Year 24-25 Average: 58 Current Year-to-Date Average: 59 Fiscal Year 24-25 Average: 6.1% Current Year-to-Date Average: 10.1% PAGE 19 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
59 55 56 56 58 58 57 59 59 59 61
0 50
100
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Workers' Comp Claims (Total Open)
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
1 0
3 0
2 2 2
1 3
2 1
0 2
4 6
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Workers' Comp Claims (New)
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
34 31
57 76 67
135 117 116 124 105 97
0 50
100
150
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Workers' Comp Cumulative Days Off (in month)
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
Human Resources
Fiscal Year 24-25 Average: 65 Current Year-to-Date Average: 58 Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 34 Current Year-to-Date Total: 17 Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 672 Current Year-to-Date Total: 959 PAGE 20 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
79% 75% 70% 72% 71% 70% 70% 66% 70% 70% 76%
0%
50%
100%
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Performance Evaluation Completion Rate
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
Fiscal Year 24-25 Average: 68% Current Year-to-Date Average: 72% Human Resources
PAGE 21 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
51 42
57 55
36 41
61 30
57 31
33 0
50 100
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Maintenance Service Requests Opened
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
6% 6% 5% 6%
4% 5% 5%
6%
0% 3% 3% 3%
5%
10%
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
% Fleet Out of Service More Than 3 Business Days
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
Fiscal Year 24-25 Average: 5.3% Current Year-to-Date Average: 4.7% Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 603 Current Year-to-Date Total: 494 Parks & Public Works
90% 88% 95% 93% 88% 95% 92% 88% 93% 94% 97%
0%
50%
100%
150%
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
% Service Requests Closed Within 5 Business Days
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
Fiscal Year 24-25 Average: 91% Current Year-to-Date Average: 92% PAGE 22 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
14 12 15
6 8
4 9 7
16 0
11 10
10 20
30 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Encroachment Permits Issued
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
Capital Projects in Design 3
Capital Projects in Construction 1
Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 168 Current Year-to-Date Total: 112 4 3 3
4 7
4 5
7 1
7 4
0 5
10 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Public Works Afterhours Staff Call Outs
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 39 Current Year-to-Date Total: 49 Parks & Public Works
PAGE 23 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
43 45
31 45
31 33 25 21
50 40 40
0 20
40 60
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Public Record Requests Received
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
6 6
8 6
5 6
9 8
6 6
8 0
5 10
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Average Time to Respond to Public Records Requests (days) FY 24-25 FY 25-26
4 0
2 0
2 3 3
1 1 1 1
0 2
4 6
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Claims Received
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
City Manager’s Office
Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 388 Current Year-to-Date Total: 404 Fiscal Year 24-25 Average: 8 Current Year-to-Date Average: 7 Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 19 Current Year-to-Date Total: 18 PAGE 24 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
10 0
2 5 5
2 3
0 3
11 19
0 10
20 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Proclamations and Certificates Prepared
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
3 2
2 1
0 1
0 6
5 2
5 4
2 1
2 6
0 3
0 4
2 4
3 0
0 3
2 4
2 0
1 4
3 3
0 5
0 2
8 2
0 2
0 3
1 2
4 1
2 0
1 5
6 1
0 0
0 6
5 2
0 2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344 City Manager's Office
Finance
Human Resources
Community Development
Parks & Public Works
Fire
Police
Community Services
# of Agenda Items by Department
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 63 Current Year-to-Date Total: 60 City Manager’s Office
PAGE 25 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
0 3 3
4 2
3 3
2 2
3 3
0 5
10 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Film Permits Processed
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
1 3
0 5
0 0
1 2 2
1 3
0 2
4 6
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Special Event Permits Processed
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
City Manager’s Office
Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 36 Current Year-to-Date Total: 28 Fiscal Year 24-25 Total: 17 Current Year-to-Date Total: 18 PAGE 26 of 341
City Manager’s Report and Operational
Dashboard
June 10, 2026
0 50
100
150
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
New Weekly Briefing Monthly Sign Ups
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
4,383
7,130 9,724
6,193
28,933
9,382 10,035 8,271 7,221
3,892
16,058
8,259 10,650
6,808 9,415 6,603 4,387 4,199 2,124 2,149 3,379 3,813
0 10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
Facebook Instagram
Social Media Reach
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
1,604
2,366
1,223 1,295
657
147
625 493 607
2,387
335
0 1,000
2,000
3,000
Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
LinkedIn Impressions
FY 24-25 FY 25-26
City Manager’s Office
Current Year-to-Date Average: 9
Current Year-to-Date: 11,739
PAGE 27 of 341

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY

TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Isidro Figueroa, Community Development Director
Aubrey Stark-Miller, Assistant Planner
DATE: June 10, 2026
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION’S DECISION TO DENY DESIGN REVIEW
CASE NO. DR 22-26 AT 535 OLD MILL ROAD TO THE
DEMOLISH AN EXISTING 1,751 SQUARE-FOOT
RESIDENCE AND CONSTRUCT A NEW TWO-STORY 2,690

SQUARE-FOOT RESIDENCE WITH A DETACHED TWO-CAR

GARAGE (CHAN)

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Beautiful, Preserved, Single-Family Neighborhoods
Engaged and Connected Residents

BACKGROUND
The applicant is proposing to demolish an existing 1,751 square-foot (sq ft) single-family residence and associated buildings and construct a 2,690 sq ft two-story residence with a detached 552 sq ft 2-car garage. The project is located on a 7,436 square-foot (sq ft) interior lot in the R-1 zone, Area District VII, and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Low-Density Residential.

The design review action is required pursuant to San Marino Municipal Code Section 23.15.04(B) because the project proposes a new or replacement structure.

Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 28 of 341
The Planning Commission reviewed (“Commission”) the project on October 22, 2025. The Commission continued the project for the applicant to address the following concerns:
• Privacy concerns and windows
• Front yard setback
• Driveway width
• Structure height and plate heights
The Commission reviewed the project on January 28, 2026. At the meeting, the applicant presented the project which was revised to address most of the concerns identified by the Commission at the October 22, 2025, meeting. The design changes reviewed by the Commission at the meeting consisted of the following:
• The applicant previously requested a variance to allow the residence to encroach within the front yard setback. The project was revised to comply with the front yard setback; therefore, the variance is no longer required.
• Windows:
o On the west side, Window 16 was replaced with privacy glazing glass blocks and a window was entirely removed on the second floor.
• Front yard:
o The proposed residence now has a setback of 35’ 4”, no longer requiring a variance as it meets the City’s required setback per the Yard Map.
• Driveway:
o Driveway has been widened with the setback from side yard property line changed from 10’ to 10’ 6”.
• Front façade:
o The structure’s overall height has been reduced from 23’ 6” to 22’ 8”
o Front facing gable reduced one 1ft to 13’ 6”. Plate height is reduced from 8’ 6” to 8’ 4”.
• Balcony:
o The Juliet balcony on the front façade has been changed in design. • Residence Side Yard Setbacks:
o The setback of the second floor from the property line has been changed by 6 inches on the east side.

PAGE 29 of 341
After reviewing the staff report, revised plans and associated documents, and receiving public comment from members of the public, the Commission found that the project did not meet the required findings and denied DR 22-26 by a 3-2 vote. On February 25, 2026, the Commission adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. PCR 25-17 for the denial of DR 22-26. On February 26, 2026, Patty Chan filed an appeal of the Planning Commission’s denial of for DR 22-26.

DISCUSSION
Pursuant to San Marino Municipal Code (SMMC) Section 23.07.09 – Appeals, upon receiving a notice of appeal (or itself appealing a decision of the Commission), the City Council shall either:
a. Affirm the action of the Commission; or
If the Council agrees with the Planning Commission, a resolution affirming the Planning Commission’s decision has been included with this staff report.
b. Require a summary of all evidence upon which the Planning Commission made its decision; after receiving such evidence, the Council shall take such action as, in its opinion, is indicated by such evidence alone; or
The evidence before the Planning Commission has been
summarized in the staff report and in the resolution adopted by the Planning Commission. Accordingly, the Council may take action (approve or deny the appeal), unless the Council wishes a more detailed summary or decides to refer the matter back to the Planning Commission (option 3) or set a de novo public hearing (option 4).
c. Refer the matter back to the Planning Commission, with or without instructions, for further proceedings; or
Please see b above.
d. Instruct the City Clerk to set the matter for hearing within seventyfive (75) days before itself, unless the applicant and all appellants consent to a later date. At such hearing, it shall hear and decide the case de novo. Such hearing shall be conducted in the manner and with the notice prescribed by the SMMC for the Planning Commission.

Please see b above.

PAGE 30 of 341
APPEAL
On January 28, 2026, the Commission denied a proposal to demolish an existing 1,751 square-foot (sq ft) single-family residence and associated buildings and construct a 2,690 sq ft two-story residence with a detached 552 sq ft 2-car garage, during a public hearing.

The staff reports reviewed by the Commission on October 22, 2025, and January 28, 2026, provided an analysis of the project based on the information available to staff. The staff reports can be accessed through the following link:
https://sanmarinoca.gov/government/agendas___minutes_/index.php On February 26, 2026, the appellant, Paty Chan, filed the appeal for DR 22-

26. The submitted appeal application listed a number of contentions (Attachment 8), which are summarized below:

1. The staff report provided information and an analysis that the proposed project complied with Finding Number 1, “That the proposed structure is compatible with the
neighborhood”. The architect also provided revisions to the proposed project, ensuing combability with the adjacent properties and neighborhood for the second hearing.
(Additional information provided in Attachment 12).
a. Staff’s original analysis for Finding 1 was as follows:
i. The project encompasses the construction of a new
2,690 sq ft two-story Spanish style single-family
residence with a detached 529 sq ft 2-car garage. The
proposed Spanish Colonial Revival home is compatible
with the legal neighborhood and with the existing
property. The legal neighborhood is comprised of
homes that display Spanish Colonial Revival and
Mediterranean Revival architecturally styled homes.
ii. The height of the proposed residence is 21 feet-5
inches. The proposed structure is compatible with the
height of the adjacent neighbor’s home at 545 Old Mill
Road, which has a height of 21 feet – 8 inches and with other residences in the legal neighborhood such as 550
Old Mill Road, at approximately 25 feet in height.
iii. The proposed massing of the residence is compatible with the surrounding residences located within the
neighborhood. Compatible residences within the legal
neighborhood include 560 Old Mill Road with a livable
PAGE 31 of 341
area of 2,951 sq ft, and 550 Old Mill Road with a livable area of 3,130 sq ft.

2. The staff report provided information and an analysis that the proposed project complied with this finding. Revisions were made to address the privacy concerns for the second hearing. (Additional information provided in Attachment 12).
a. Staff’s original analysis for Finding 1 was as follows:
i. The two-story design of the home is consistent with the majority of the residences found in the legal
neighborhood that are designed as two-story
residences.
ii. The proposed side setback to the east neighboring
property is 10 feet-6 inches, which is greater than the existing setback of 8 feet-11 inches. The proposed side setback to the west neighboring property is 5 feet-6
inches, which is greater than the existing setback of 3 feet-10 inches.
iii. The property features existing 16-foot-tall cypress hedges and a proposed 6-foot-tall CMU block wall with
stucco that wraps around the entire perimeter of the
property from the front of the house to the rear
property line. There are existing hedges and as the
property abuts the rear yard of 505 Old Mill Road, the
side yard impact is decreased. There is significant
landscaping and no structure directly behind the rear
property line of 535 Old Mill Road. Therefore, the
visibility and privacy of either adjacent or rear neighbor would be minimally impacted, and there would be a
reasonable expectation of privacy.
iv. The proposal is developed in a manner that balances the reasonable expectation of privacy of persons
residing on contiguous properties with the reasonable
expectations of the applicants to develop their property within the restrictions of this code.

PAGE 32 of 341

3. The staff report concluded that all the required findings were met and provided a recommendation to approve the project.

The Planning Commission ignored the recommendation
without explanation.
a. The Commission determined that the project did not meet the required findings; therefore, denying the project. The
Commission found the massing of the proposed residence
incompatible with surrounding residences within the
neighborhood and the windows on the proposed east
elevation create a direct line of sight into the neighbor’s property at 545 Old Mill Road without any mitigating factors.

Please refer to the Findings section under Findings 1 and 2 for a complete analysis.

PROJECT DETAILS
DR 22-26 (New Residence)
The applicant is proposing to demolish a 1,751 sq ft single-family residence and associated buildings. The project encompasses the construction of a new 2,690 sq ft two-story residence with a detached 552 sq ft 2-car garage.

Floor plans
The first-floor plan proposes a total of 1,610 sq ft of livable area. The floor plan includes two bedrooms, a living room, a dining room, a kitchen, and an uncovered rear patio.

The second-floor plan proposes a total of 1,025 sq ft of livable area. The floor plan includes two bedrooms and a loft.

In accordance with SMMC 23.02.09(C), the livable area for rooms with a height of fifteen feet (15’) or greater as measured from the finished floor to the ceiling shall be twice the floor area of the room, including stairways.

Therefore, an additional 55 square feet is calculated for the stairway leading to the second floor which is included in the livable area tabulation box found on sheet A1.0 of the project plans.

Windows and Roofing
The residence was designed to incorporate aluminum-clad casement and fixed windows from Pella Lifestyle series. The proposed roof is a 2-piece mission clay tile.

PAGE 33 of 341
As shown in the following table, the project complies with SMMC requirements for a single-family residence located within District Area VII:

CRITERIA REGULATION EXISTING PROPOSED
ZONING:

Maximum
Livable Area/Lot
Coverage
Maximum
2,700 sq ft
Lot Coverage:
1,751 sq ft
Livable Area:
1,751 sq ft
Lot Coverage:2,375 sq
ft
Livable Area: 2,690 sq
ft
HEIGHT
Maximum
Allowed
Maximum 30
feet
15 feet 21 feet-5 inches

YARD DIMENSIONS
Front Minimum 35
feet
30 feet-2
inches
35 feet- 4 inches
Side (East) Minimum 5
feet
8 feet-11
inches
10 feet
Side (West) Minimum 5
feet
3 feet-10
inches
5 feet-6 inches
Rear Minimum 25
feet
63 feet-1
inches
53 feet- 9 inches

PARKING
Garage Spaces
for 4 bedrooms
2 covered
spaces
2 covered
spaces
2 covered spaces
Garage Parking
Configuration
No tandem
parking
allowed
Side-by-side
parking
Side-by-side parking
DESIGN
Architectural
Style
No Regulation Spanish Spanish Colonial
Revival

TREE PRESERVATION
The applicant proposes the protection of 6 trees and the removal of two (2) trees, as listed on the Arborist Report dated April 5, 2025:
• Tree No. 4: 20-foot-tall Pyrus Calleryana with a 5-inch trunk diameter • Tree No. 5: 25-foot-tall Citrus with an 8-inch trunk diameter Replacement trees for the two removed trees include the following types and sizes:
• One (1) 15-gallon Western redbud tree
• One (1) 15-gallon lime tree
PAGE 34 of 341
• One (1) 15-gallon Fuji apple tree
• One (1) 24-inch boxed Wilson olive tree
• One (1) 15-gallon wild lilac tree
• One (1) 15-gallon Eureka lemon tree
There are 12 existing protected trees on the property. Trees No. 4 and No. 5 to be removed require removal to allow for construction. The two replacement trees proposed in the front yard are the olive and western redbud trees. A lime tree, lemon tree and an apple tree are proposed as replacement trees in the rear yard. Seven trees require protection. The replacement trees have been approved by the City’s Urban Forester.

Since the January 28, 2026 Planning Commission meeting, the applicant has revised the project plans to encompass the following changes:
• Sheet A6.2 has been updated to include spec number with specific manufacture cut sheets;
• To address the Commission’s privacy concerns, the applicant added a Chinese flame tree for privacy in the northwest corner of the property which can be located on Sheet L-1; and
• The table on sheet A1.1 has been updated to note that the existing jacaranda in front yard will remain.

The applicant has provided a presentation of the project which is included in the staff report as Attachment 11.

HISTORIC PRESERVATION
The subject property is identified on the Citywide Historic Resources Survey Report as a potential historic resource. The structure is listed as a potential district contributor of the potential future Mission Residential Historic District.

Neighborhood notification prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for October 22, 2025, and January 28, 2026, encompassed the following:

Do Not Object – 8
Object – 0
No Response (with two attempts of certified mailings) – 1 Environmental Findings
The project encompasses the demolition of an existing 1,751 square-foot single-family residence and associated buildings in order to construct a new 2,690 sq ft two-story residence with a detached 552 sq ft 2-car garage.

PAGE 35 of 341
Pursuant to Section 21084 of the California Public Resource Code, the proposed second-story addition is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Article 19, State CEQA Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies.

FINDINGS
Design Review Findings –DR 22-26
Based on the information presented to the Commission and public testimony received at the October 22, 2025, and January 28, 2026 public hearings, the Planning Commission determined that the project did not meet the required findings as stipulated under SMMC Section 23.15.08 which consists of the following:

1. That the proposed structure is compatible with the
neighborhood.

The project encompasses the construction of a new 2,690-square-foot two-story Spanish style single-family residence with a detached 552- square-foot two-car garage.

The proposed massing of the residence is incompatible with the surrounding residences located within the neighborhood. The proposed residence is improved on a 7,218-square-foot lot and the proposed livable area is 2,690-square-feet, which is 37 percent of the property and significantly larger than the average of 29 percent in the legal neighborhood.

As such, this project does not meet this finding.

The windows on the proposed east elevation create a direct line of sight into the neighbor’s property at 545 Old Mill Road without any mitigating factors.

PAGE 36 of 341
The proposed project does not properly balance the reasonable expectation of privacy of persons residing on contiguous properties with the reasonable expectations of the applicants to develop their property within the restrictions of this code.

As such, this project does not meet this finding.

3. In the case of a building addition, the proposal is compatible with the existing building which includes the rooflines.

The proposed project involves demolishing the existing single-family residence and constructing a new single-family residence.

Consequently, this finding is not applicable to this project.

4. That the colors and materials are consistent and match the existing building or structure.

The project is proposing to demolish the existing single-family residence and construct a new single-family residence. Consequently, this finding is not applicable to this project.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
None are associated with this action.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney’s office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Based on the information submitted to the record, staff recommends that the City Council: (1) determine that based on the whole of the administrative record, that the proposed addition is exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1 & Class 3, and that there is no substantial evidence demonstrating an exception to the categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 applies; (2) find that the proposed project meets the required findings; and (3) approve the project.

If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to adopt City Council Resolution No. R-26-21 approving the project as presented and find that the proposed project meets the required findings and determine that based on the whole of the administrative record, that the PAGE 37 of 341
proposed addition is exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1 & Class 3, and that there is no substantial evidence demonstrating an exception to the categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 applies.”
If the City Council affirms the adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No.

PCR 26-17, the appropriate motion would be:
“I move to adopt City Council Resolution No. R-26-21 affirming the adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. PCR 26-17 to deny Design Review Case Number DR-22-26 at 535 Old Mill Road to demolish an existing 1,751 sq ft single-family residence and construct a 2,690 sq ft two-story residence with a detached 2-car garage.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. Planning Commission Resolution PCR 26-17

2. Project Plans

3. Neighborhood Map

4. Neighborhood Input Letters

5. Historical Resource Assessment Report

6. DPR Form

7. Arborist Report

8. Appeal Application and Supporting Documentation

9. City Council Resolution No. R-26-21 (Approval)

10. City Council Resolution No. R-26-21 (Denial)

11. Applicant’s Project Presentation
PAGE 38 of 341
PAGE 39 of 341
PAGE 40 of 341
PAGE 41 of 341
x
xxxxxx
PAGE 42 of 341
PAGE 43 of 341
PAGE 44 of 341
PAGE 45 of 341
PAGE 46 of 341
PAGE 47 of 341
PAGE 48 of 341
PAGE 49 of 341
x
x
PAGE 50 of 341
PAGE 51 of 341
PAGE 52 of 341
PAGE 53 of 341
PAGE 54 of 341
x
xxxxxx
xx x
xxx
PAGE 55 of 341
x
xxxxxx
” ”
” ”
PAGE 56 of 341
x
xxxxxx
PAGE 57 of 341
x
xxxxxx
PAGE 58 of 341
PAGE 59 of 341
x
x
x
x
PAGE 60 of 341
’
PAGE 61 of 341
PAGE 62 of 341

PROPERTY OF NC DESIGNS ONLY,

TO BE BUILT SOLELY BY THE
CLIENT NAMED HERE. PERMISSION
MUST BE GRANTED FOR THISDRAWING TO BE USED ORREPRODUCED BY ANY OTHERS. 1071 LOVRLos Osos, CA 93402
805.704.9027
NCDESIGNS.CO
Scale: 1/8"=1'-0"

SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT QTY
TREES
CEANOTHUS X 'RAY HARTMAN' / RAY HARTMAN WILD LILAC 15 GAL 1CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS / WESTERN REDBUD 15 GAL 1 JACARANDA MIMOSIFOLIA / JACARANDA EXISTING 1
KOELREUTERIA BIPINNATA / CHINESE FLAME TREE 15 GAL 1MALUS X DOMESTICA 'FUJI' / FUJI APPLE 15 GAL 1 OLEA EUROPAEA `WILSONII` / WILSON OLIVE 24"BOX 1

FRUIT TREES
CITRUS X LIMON 'EUREKA' / EUREKA LEMON 15 GAL 1

SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE QTYSHRUBS
COTINUS COGGYGRIA 'PURPUREUS' / PURPLE SMOKE TREE 5 GAL 1CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRENS / ITALIAN CYPRESS EXISTING 8GAURA LINDHEIMERI `GEYSER WHITE` / GEYSER WHITE GAURA 1 GAL 3 LAVANDULA X INTERMEDIA `PROVENCE` / PROVENCE LAVENDIN 5 GAL 7NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW` / WALKERS LOW CATMINT 1 GAL 22 OLEA EUROPAEA 'MONTRA' / LITTLE OLLIE® OLIVE 5 GAL 12SALVIA SPATHACEA / HUMMINGBIRD SAGE 1 GAL 11

GRASSES
CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' / KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS 1 GAL 17 PENNISETUM ALOPECUROIDES `HAMELN` / HAMELN FOUNTAIN GRASS 1 GAL 17

SYMBOL BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT SPACING QTY

GROUND COVERS
TURF SOD / DROUGHT TOLERANT FESCUE BLEND NONE 1,393 SF

PLANT SCHEDULE
NOTE: Refer to accompanying Tree Path Protected Tree Report for tree map and associated data.

PAGE 63 of 341

OLD MILL PLANT PALETTE
Provence Lavandin Geyser White Gaura Wilson’s Olive Tree - Fruitless Western Redbud Tree
Walker’s Low Catmint
Hamln Fountain Grass Chinese Flame Tree
Little Ollie Olive Karl Foerster Feather Reed Grass
Purple Smoke Tree
Ray Hartman Ceanothus
PAGE 64 of 341

OLD MILL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS
Belgard Catalina Grana Paver - Driveway Option Belgard Large Melville Plank Paver - Driveway Option Santa Barbara Boulders Granite Boulders
Topcast Exposed Concrete Pea Gravel
PAGE 65 of 341
2/2/23, 9:33 AM .
https://apps.spatialstream.com/landvision/production/CurrentBuild/Html/printpreview.html# 1/4 © 2023 Digital Map Products. All rights reserved.
78 feet
PAGE 66 of 341

CITY OF SAN MARINO

NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT LETTER
The City welcomes public input on design review projects. Once completed, deliver this Neighborhood Input Letter to the Planning Division of the Community Development Department.

I, _C;;.;H~E.;..N;.J.., .;...R~A.;..Y_M_O_N_D _____________ , am a property owner/resident of (neighbor's name)
_1_6_7_9_S_LO_S_R_O_B_LE_S_A_V_E_N_U_E ________ ......;, San Marino, and have been shown (neighbor,.'s address)
the architectural plans and elevations of proposed changes to the neighboring property located at 535 OLD MILL ROAD
(project address)
After receiving an explanation and reviewing the plans of the proposed changes ( check applicable response):

D I OBJECT to the project.
~ I DO NOT OBJECT to the project.

Comments (Optional):
re of Neighbor (Resident/Property Owner) Date
Community Development Department • San Marino City Hall 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino, CA 91108 • (626) 300-0700 PAGE 67 of 341

CITY OF SAN MARINO

NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT LETTER
The City welcomes public Input on da1lgn review proJecu. Once, c;omp,oiocf, dofl~or thfs Ncfzt,borhood Input Letter to the Plannlng Division of the Community DcwolopmGnt Department.

I. PRT CHAN LLC ( PROPERTY OWNER) . am a property owner/resident of (neighbor's name)
_____________________ 535 OLD MILL ROAD , , San Marino, and have been shown (neighbor's address)
the architectural plans and elevations of proposed changes to the neighboring property located at 535 OLD MILL ROAD
(project address)
After receiving an explanation and reviewing the plans of the proposed changes ( check applicable response):
□ I OBJECT to the project.
fZf I DO NOT OBJECT to the project.

Comments (Optional):
n Property Owner) Dote
Community Development Department • San Marino City Hall 2200 Huntington Drive. San Marino. CA 91108 • (626) 300-0700 PAGE 68 of 341
.• ii,~~. "'B,_ • """I-, ... •• ·-,,.,. .. ," _.,,_
.•~~,_:. ~-- . ~( fl I •,·:-
•Vt,~ J; ~--, ·• • • ., ••• i-... ...,,., ' ,.,r, \
. • ' ;;,,-•'~ . , . ,, ', • q. -~ I ••• • , . \
: !,-~
~ ' • -'
. /J.~}s,:'
.. :;i • ...:;,;'
• ,·., ' ... ·.·..,., . . . ., \,.
~-' '~ ,l; ..,,;,..,

CITY OF SAN MARINO

1. JUNG, SOON W , am a property owner/resident of
(neighbor's name)
545 OLD MILL ROAD
----------------------, San Marino, and have been shown (neighbor's address)
the architectural plans and elevations of proposed changes to the neighboring property located at 535 OLD MILL ROAD
(project address)
After receiving an explanation and reviewing the plans of the proposed changes (check applicable response):
□ I OBJECT to the project.
~O NOT OBJECT to the project.

Comments (Optional):
sident/Property Owner) Date
Community Development Department • San Marino City Hall 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino, CA 91108 • (626) 300-0700 PAGE 69 of 341

CITY OF SAN MARINO

NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT LETTER
The City welcomes public input on design review projects. Once completed, deUver this Neighborhood Input Letter to the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. 1, REPETTI, FRANCIS G OR REPETTI, NOELLE M , am a property owner/resident of (neighbor's name)
_5_5_0_O_L_D_M_IL_L_R_O_A_D ____________ --J San Marino, and have been shown (neighbor's address)
the architectural plans and elevations of proposed changes to the neighboring property located at 535 OLD MILL ROAD
(project address)
After receiving an explanation and reviewing the plans of the proposed changes ( check applicable response):

D I OBJECT to the project.

IE] I DO NOT OBJECT to the project.
es, en Property Owner) Date
Community Development Department • San Marino City Hall 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino. CA 91108 • (626) 300-0700 PAGE 70 of 341

CITY OF SAN MARINO

NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT LETTER
The City welcomes public Input on design review projects. Once completed. deliver this Neighborhood Input Letter to the Planning Division of the Community Development Department.

I, KELLY, BRYAN HOR SAKAGUCHI, MARISA N
(neighbor's name)
, am a property owner/resident of
___________________ 1670 S LOS ROBLES AVENUE San Marino, and have been shown _. (neighbor's address)
the architectural plans and elevations of proposed changes to the neighboring property located at 535 OLD MILL ROAD
(project address) \
j
After receiving an explanation and reviewing the plans of the proposed changes (check applicable response):
□ I OBJECT to the project.
l,?<T I DO NOT OBJECT to the project.

Comments (Optional):

Signature of Neighbor (R~ Owner) Date
Community Development Department • San Marino City Hall 2200 Hundngton Drive. San Marino. CA 91108 • (626) 300-0700 f_/
PAGE 71 of 341
r
Fi

CITY OF SAN MARINO

NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT LETTER
The City welcomes public Input on design review projects. Once completed, deliver this Neighborhood Input Letter to the Plannlng Dlvtslon of the Community Development Department.

I, ___ c_H_IU_,_J_E_F_F_R_E_Y_O_R_C_H_IU_,_c_E_C_I_L_E _____ ,. am a property owner/resident of (neighbor's name)
1657 S. LOS ROBLES AVENUE , San Marino, and have been shown ----------------------· (neighbor's address)
the architectural plans and elevations of proposed changes to the neighboring property located at:
535 OLD MILL ROAD
(project address)
After receiving an explanation and reviewing the plans of the proposed changes ( check applicable response):

D I OBJECT to the project.
~ NOT OBJECT to the project.

Comments (Optional):
elghbor (Residenr/Property Owner) Odte
Community Development Department • San Marino City Hall 2200 Hundngton Drive, San Marino, CA CJ 1108 • (626) 300-0700 PAGE 72 of 341
-

CITY OF SAN MARINO

NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT LETTER
The City welcomes public Input on design review protects. Once completed, deliver this Neighborhood Input Letter to the Planning Division of the Community Development Department.

WU, SHARON OR WU, VIVIEN
I, ____________________ , am a property owner/resident of (neighbor's name)
560 OLD MILL ROAD _____________________ , San Marino, and have been shown (neighbor's address)
the architectural plans and elevations of proposed changes to the neighboring property located at:
535 OLD MILL ROAD
(project address)
After receiving an explanation and reviewing the plans of the proposed changes ( check applicable response):

D I OBJECT to the project.
'0 I DO NOT OBJECT to the project.

Comments (Optional):
es/dent/Property O er) Date
Community Development Department • San Marino City Hall 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino, CA 91108 • (626) 300-0700 I
PAGE 73 of 341

CITY OF SAN MARINO

NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT LETTER
The City welcomes public input on design review projects. Once completed. deliver this Neighborhood Input Letter to the Planning Division of the Community Development Department.

I, ___ A_L_E_XA_N_D_E_R_, _G_RA_N_T __________ , am a property owner/resident of (neighbor·s name)
555 OLD MILL ROAD , San Marino, and have been shown ---------------------- (neighbor·s address) the architectural plans and elevations of proposed changes to the neighboring property located at 535 OLD MILL ROAD
(project address)
After receiving an explanation and revi~w~ng the plans of the proposed changes (check applicable response):
□ I OBJECT to the project.

I DO NOT OBJECT to the project. aw--
Comments (Optional):

Signawre of Neighbor (Residenr/Property Owner) Date
Community Development Department• San Marino City Hall
2200 Huntington Drive. San Marino, CA CJI 108 • (626) 300-0700 •
PAGE 74 of 341

CITY OF SAN MARINO

NEIGHBORHOOD NOTIFICATION

DECLARATION
Project Address: __ 5_3_5_O_L_D_M_IL_L_R_O_A_D _______________ _ Case Number(s): __ D_R_C_2_2_-2_6 ___________________ _ Regarding the above-referenced project, I have made two (2) attempts in the form of certified mail to contact the property owner(s) of the following property(ies) in the legal neighborhood:
505 OLD MILL ROAD

YU, JEAN SHOOK YING,
1107 FAIR OAKS AVENUE #505 SOUTH PASADENA
"" \
\
1635 S LOS ROBLES AVENUE I
' )

KOO, PATRICK OR VOORA, SANTHL
460 S SPRING ST. APT 1205 LOS ANGELES
Attach a list if more space is required.

With each attempt, I provided the owner(s) of the aforementioned properties:
• The project address, case number(s), and a way for residents to contact me about the project. • An explanation of the proposed project and what requires design review. • A copy of the plans showing the proposed changes, minimum I I" x 17" in size.

Copies of the postmarked certified mail receipts are attached'.,to this form as proof.

I declare under that the foregoing is true and correct.

PATTY CHAN, PRT CHAN LLC
Signature cant Print Name
Date
Community Development Department • San Marino City Hall 2200 Hundngton Drive, San Marino, CA 91108 • (626) 300-0700 PAGE 75 of 341 - -
_,.... --:-- - - --··--17-----r_ -------.;; , ·--:-- - ' .
n.J
rn
m
co
r'-
Cl
~
cO
c:l
J]
cO
c:l
Cl
Cl
Cl
~
cO
U'l
...D
.::r
U.S. Postal ServiceT ..

Domestic Mail Only
bH~i«i@ iaM1Ail·i1•.~ZM-1i->=4r.f '"1 "{< l#·ii·G@4h@·H11r11E· ~ • ;:: · - ~~ ..-::i
ZE~ i~
0 0RatiMnR Certifted Mail Aa1ib1d«f
~ D Adult SignalUr9 ~
/? <" "'\)
~~s o~Slgna!l.nt
1$.
postage
[Total P..otStage . ._,.~
i~
• TM erv1ce RTIFIEO MAIL® RECEIPT oornc-stic Mai/ Only CCI For dcflv"'-• • [l
c::cl
c::::J
c:::l
Cl
CJ
• '-'"'-'
□"'
~oesc
i:,t,!
~~ ---,-,-~ A.:umRecelpt(~bonlc) c.tltJed Man~ DeDwry Adult~~ 0 0 D D AduftSIQnati.re ~ o.av.,y of~~. $9.~ j ;I; tw.P-• ana" CJ ~l ~ .~1_,- , ' $ 10- CJ
r-=,
~f'-
n-tt.ps: 1 '
A\ \ sa \ es -f i na \ o1 Re-funds -tor guara ,h~nk 'iou f o ller••WA·~ ,,,aatna·~ . ~h~tN~•
e 20
21 ,, vvv,.,_. ~
I --~-
~ \ ••---•-• / ~ • I ------ ---- ____ iv-o----~~~-=:;t I ·--- PAGE 76 of 341
Historical Resources Assessment Report for
535 Old Mill Road
San Marino, California 91108

Prepared for:
535 Old Mill Road
San Marino, CA 91108

Prepared by:

Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
430 North Halstead Street
Pasadena, California 91107

July 25, 2021
PAGE 77 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTIONS PAGE
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................... 1 2 PROJECT SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 2 3 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 3 4 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS/DESIGNATIONS ........................................... 4 5 HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION OF THE SURROUNDING AREA...................................... 5 6 PROPERTY HISTORY ...................................................................................................... 9 7 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ........................................................................................16 8 HISTORIC CONTEXT .....................................................................................................19 9 EVALUATION OF ELIGIBILITY .......................................................................................22 10 CONCLUSIONS.............................................................................................................25 11 REFERENCES..................................................................................................................26

TABLES PAGE
1 Building Permit History ..................................................................................................14 2 Ownership History .........................................................................................................14

FIGURES PAGE
1A Setting, Old Mill Road (view facing east) .......................................................................... 9 1B Setting, Old Mill Road (view facing west) ......................................................................... 9 2 Sketch Map ....................................................................................................................10 3 Project Location Map......................................................................................................11 4 Primary Façade (view facing north) .................................................................................12

ATTACHMENTS
A Resume of Key Personnel
B DPR 523 Series Forms
PAGE 78 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 1 SECTION 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Historical Resources Assessment Report (HRAR) presents the results of an historical resources assessment for the building located at 535 Old Mill Road (Assessor’s Parcel Number [APN] 5325- 005-025), City of San Marino (City), Los Angeles County, California. Sapphos Environmental, Inc. architectural historians (Mr. Scott Torres and Ms. Carrie Chasteen) were retained to serve as the principal investigators to complete the HRAR. Mr. Torres and Ms. Chasteen meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards in the fields of History and Architectural History.

The property is located on a residential street in the City with one 1,751-square-foot residence located at 535 Old Mill Road.

Architectural Resources Group (ARG) completed a Citywide historic resources survey of San Marino in 2020. In the ARG historic resources survey, the subject property was not identified as an individually eligible resource for listing at the national, state, or local level. The subject property was identified as a contributor to the potential Mission Street Residential Historic District, eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register), California Register of Historical Resources (California Register), or for designation as a City Historic Landmark (Historic Landmark).

After careful research and evaluation, Sapphos Environmental, Inc. (Mr. Torres; Attachment A, Resume of Key Personnel) concludes that the building does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National Register, California Register, or as a Historic Landmark. The subject property would also not contribute to a potential historic district as neighboring properties serve as excellent examples of the style. The subject property was added to the predominantly developed tract in 1932.

In addition to being a latter addition, the subject property is not an excellent example of the style on the block. In addition to being the least noted property on the 500 block of Old Mill Road, additional properties were constructed in the 1950s and are examples of the ubiquitous Ranch-style homes found throughout the City. The potentially eligible district contains over 200 potentially eligible contributors and the loss of this one would not impact the significance of the district. It is assumed the potential historic district would continue to qualify for designation with the loss of this property; therefore, the proposed project was evaluated against the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (Standards). The proposed project complies with the Standards and would not result in a substantial adverse change to historical resources pursuant to Section 15064.5(b) of the CEQA Guidelines.

PAGE 79 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 2 SECTION 2

PROJECT SUMMARY

2.1 BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project will demolish the existing 1,751-square-foot single-family residence and construct a new 2,695-square-foot single-family residence.

2.2 PROJECT LOCATION AND CURRENT SETTING
The subject property consists of one parcel located at 535 Old Mill Road (APN 5325-005-025), in the City, Los Angeles County, California. The property is located on a residential street with singlefamily housing.

PAGE 80 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 3 SECTION 3

ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The assessment methodology consisted of research and field assessment of the buildings.

RESEARCH CONDUCTED

1. Obtained and reviewed the building permits for the parcel from the City Department of Building and Safety. Dates of construction and subsequent alterations were determined by the building permit records, as well as additional resources, such as the field inspection and historic aerial photographs.

2. Researched the project site and surrounding area at local libraries and archives to establish the general history and context of the project site, including a review of the Built Environment Resource Directory (BERD) for Los Angeles County, newspapers, City directories, books, and articles.

3. Consulted the Context/Theme/Property Type (CTP) eligibility standards formulated for the San Marino Historic Context Statement to identify the appropriate CTP under which to evaluate the buildings on the project site.

4. Reviewed and analyzed ordinances, statutes, regulations, bulletins, and technical materials relating to federal, state, and local historic preservation assessment processes and programs to evaluate the significance and integrity of the buildings on the project site.

FIELD METHODS

5. Conducted a windshield survey of the project site on October 15, 2021, to ascertain the general condition and physical integrity of the buildings thereon. Digital photographs were taken during the site inspection, which included only the exterior of the buildings.

Field notes were made.

6. It was concluded during the field inspection that the subject property was evaluated individually and as a contributor to a potential historic district under federal, state, and local eligibility criteria according to the National Park Service, California Office of Historic Preservation, and San Marino Historic Ordinance standards.

PAGE 81 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 4 SECTION 4

SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS/DESIGNATIONS

4.1 RECORDS SEARCH
In accordance with the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC), located at California State University, Fullerton, current procedures and policies, the BERD for Los Angeles County, available from the California Office of Historic Preservation (updated September 15, 2021), historic U.S.

Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute series topographic maps, and aerial photographs were reviewed for the project site and adjacent properties. In addition to official maps and records, and published registers and reports for the geographic area were reviewed:
• National Register of Historic Places – Listed (2022); • California Register of Historical Resources – Listed (2022); • California State Historical Landmarks (1996 and updates); • California Points of Historical Interest (1992 and updates); • Built Environment Resources Directory (BERD) 2020;
• City of San Marino Citywide Historic Survey – (2020); and • City of San Marino Final Property List (2020).

4.2 PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS/DESIGNATIONS SUMMARY
Architectural Resources Group (ARG) completed a Citywide survey of San Marino in 2020 including a draft context statement and historical resource map with an index for individual resources and districts (updated October 6, 2020).
1,2
In the ARG report, the subject property was identified as a contributor to, the potentially eligible for listing in California Register of Historical Resources (California Register), or for designation as a City Historic Landmark (Historic Landmark). To determine the significance and eligibility, the entire district would need to be evaluated. A complete evaluation of each property within the district is beyond the scope of this evaluation. 1 City of San Marino. 2020. City of San Marino Historic Citywide Survey Map. City of San Marino. Prepared by:

Architectural Resources Group, Pasadena, CA. Available at:
https://www.cityofsanmarino.org/DocumentCenter/View/4570/San-Marino-Recon-Map-61319 2 City of San Marino. Updated 15 May 2020 (working document). “San Marino Historical Resources Survey ‐ Preliminary List of Properties to be Surveyed ‐ DISTRICTS.” Available at:
https://www.cityofsanmarino.org/planning/Historic%20Survey/San%20Marino%20Property%20List%20- %20Districts%20-%205.15.20.pdf
PAGE 82 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 5 SECTION 5

HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION OF THE SURROUNDING AREA
This report employs the historic contexts, themes, and criteria considerations set forth in the initial City of San Marino Citywide Historic Context Statement completed by ARG in 2020. 3 Residential Development 1931–1945
San Marino had seen heavy residential construction during the 1920s, averaging over 150 new buildings per year and reaching a height of 212 new buildings in 1927, valued (along with additions/alterations to existing buildings) at over $3 million.4In contrast, its average between 1931 and 1934 was only 55 new buildings per year, with a low of only 44 new buildings and a valuation of $433,672 in 1934.5 The construction rate was about a third of what it was during the 1920s boom, while the valuation was about a seventh – this indicates that not only were fewer buildings built, but they were likely smaller and more modest than those that came before. It is clear that San Marino’s development slowed during the worst years of the Great Depression, just as development slowed across the nation, but it did not stop completely.

The federal government passed the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation Act in 1933 as one of several acts meant to help stabilize housing values and slow losses. It created the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC), which refinanced loans for borrowers to prevent default, and created standards for assessing the credit-worthiness of neighborhoods. In 1934, the passage of the National Housing Act created the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), which provided federal insurance for privately financed mortgages as long as the lenders submitted to federal standards. These and other federal programs during this time stimulated the revival of the construction industry, especially in better-off places like San Marino. The city felt the effects quickly. In 1935, it saw the construction of 138 new buildings, a threefold increase from 1934, with a total valuation (including additions and alterations to existing buildings) of almost $1.4 million – nearly a million dollars over the year before.6 Growth continued upward over the next few years, reaching its height in 1940. In that year, 263 new buildings (nearly all houses) were constructed, as were 284 additions to new buildings, at a valuation of $2.4 million.7 Even as construction picked up, real estate values remained lower than they had during the speculative years of the 1920s. But in terms of sheer volume of construction, 1940 exceeded even the height of the 1920s boom, as did 1941 (with 246 new buildings).8 The difference was in the types of houses built. 3 City San Marino. April 2020. San Marino Historic Context Statement Draft. Prepared by: Architectural Resources Group, Pasadena, CA. Available Available at: https://www.cityofsanmarino.org/DocumentCenter/View/4569/SanMarino-Historic-Context-Statement-Draft-4119 4 “Building Inspector’s Report,” in the William Hertrich Papers, 1904–1966. San Marino, CA: The Huntington Library; “Data Show Growth.”
5 “Building Inspector’s Report,” in the William Hertrich Papers, 1904–1966. San Marino, CA: The Huntington Library; “Data Show Growth.”
6 “Building Inspector’s Report,” in the William Hertrich Papers, 1904–1966. San Marino, CA: The Huntington Library; “Data Show Growth.”
7 “Building Two Million During 1941.” 8 January 1942. San Marino Tribune (San Marino, CA). 8 “Building Two Million During 1941.” 8 January 1942. San Marino Tribune (San Marino, CA).

PAGE 83 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 6 While San Marino still saw construction of architecturally distinctive homes on a grand scale during this period, far more common was the smaller-scale, developer-designed home. This is evident today in some of the city’s small-scale neighborhoods like San Marino Highlands (south of Huntington Drive in the east part of the city, originally planned to be the southern part of Gainsborough Heath in 1927), San Marino Oaks (just west of San Marino Highlands), and San Marino-Patton Estates (between The Huntington Library and Huntington Drive, originally subdivided right before the 1929 crash). These subdivisions built between the late 1930s and the early 1950s exhibit small (mostly one-story) houses with repetitive building plans and consistent styles, primarily in Colonial Ranch, Cape Cod Ranch, and Minimal Traditional designs. The homes tended not to be as small as the typical FHA-compliant house built in the late 1930s-early 1940s; the first few built in San Marino Highlands averaged 1,600 square feet in size.9 But the city’s developers and builders were clearly following the neighborhood and building design guidelines established by the FHA and formalized in its 1936 publication Planning Neighborhoods for Small Houses.

This guide encouraged things like curvilinear streets (already San Marino’s predominant street type) and modest homes built to maximize efficiency and ensure consistent neighborhood character.10 This kind of development made more sense for large-scale builders who could “arrange for the purchase of land, the design of the subdivision plat, and the design and construction of the houses.”11 In the case of San Marino Oaks and San Marino Highlands, it was California Subdividers.12,13,14 California Subdividers boasted that its San Marino Highlands homes “will be complete in every detail except for movable furnishings,” and were to include central heat, air conditioning, and large, fully landscaped yards with sprinklers.15,16
9 “Development Plans Prepared for New San Marino Tract.” 22 January 1939. Los Angeles Times. 10 Ames, David L. and Linda Flint McClelland. 2002. National Register Bulletin: Historic Residential Suburbs:

Guidelines for Evaluation and Documentation for the National Register of Historic Places,” 49. Washington, DC:

U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 11 Ames, David L. and Linda Flint McClelland. 2002. National Register Bulletin: Historic Residential Suburbs:

Guidelines for Evaluation and Documentation for the National Register of Historic Places,” 49. Washington, DC:

U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 12 “County Vacancy Ratio Now Lowest Since 1924.” 23 February 1941. Los Angeles Times. 13 “Homesites Bought; Residences to Rise.” 23 October 1938. Los Angeles Times. 14 “Development Plans Prepared.” 23 October 1938. Los Angeles Times. 15 “New Street Expands Tract.” 14 January 1940. Los Angeles Times. 16 “San Marino Model to Open.” 29 September 1940. Los Angeles Times.

PAGE 84 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 7 FHA guidelines also encouraged deed restrictions to ensure high property values; in practice, this included racial as well as design restrictions. Most, if not all, of San Marino’s 1920s houses carried racially restrictive covenants in their deeds; this was common across Southern California at this time. Even in areas without formal deed restrictions, informal means were typically used to exclude people of color - particularly the common realtor practice of simply refusing to show or sell properties to anyone of undesirable ethnicity.17,18 In San Marino, this real estate practice appears to have excluded most Jewish as well as African American, Asian American, and Latino buyers.19 The city’s realtors appear to have closely followed guidelines in the 1922 Code of Ethics for the National Association of Real Estate Brokers that stated, “A Realtor should never be instrumental in introducing into a neighborhood a character of property or occupancy, members of any race or nationality, or any individual whose presence will clearly be detrimental to property values in the neighborhood.”20 From its incorporation until the last quarter of the 20th century, San Marino’s residents were overwhelmingly white.

The discriminatory practice of restrictive covenants was reinforced by HOLC, which created a nationally applicable framework for appraising properties, classing neighborhoods into one of four grades: A, B, C, and D, with corresponding colors green, blue, yellow, and red shown on residential security maps, based on factors like homogeneity of population as well as proportion of multi-family income properties to single-family residences and building age/quality.21 The FHA used these ratings to decide who met the lending requirements of FHA-insured mortgages. In a practice that became known as redlining, certain neighborhoods were classed as red, a category that was usually reserved for the oldest areas with the highest ethnic diversity and presence of “subversive racial elements.” These neighborhoods were viewed as an undesirable credit risk to lenders, and their residents were rarely able to obtain FHA loans. HOLC rated all of San Marino as grade-A green in 1939, noting “Deed restrictions are ample and rigidly enforced” and “Population is homogeneous.”22 Of the most prestigious Oak Knolls area in the northwest part of town, the HOLC appraisal sheet notes “It is one of the most exclusive districts in the country and merely to be a resident here presupposes a secure place in the social register.”23 While most of San Marino’s late 1930s construction revival was due to federal programs like the FHA and HOLC, some credit is also due to an aggressive newspaper advertising campaign by a group of San Marino realtors. Display ads placed in the Los Angeles Times 17 City of Los Angeles. 2016. “Context: Jewish History” in “SurveyLA Los Angeles Citywide Historic Context Statement,” 13. Prepared by: GPA Consulting, El Segundo, CA and Becky Nicolaides. 18 Rodman, Edmon J. 9 April 2014. “Let My People Go…to Hancock Park.” Jewish Journal. 19 Hescher, Uri and Pete McCloskey cited in “Courage and Cowardice in San Marino,” Matt Hormann, Hometown Pasadena. Accessed March 2019. Available at: http://hometown-pasadena.com/history/courage-and-cowardice-insanmarino/97684 20 Marciano, R., D. Goldberg, and C. Hou. “T-RACES: a Testbed for the Redlining Archives of California's Exclusionary Spaces: Beyond HOLC.” Accessed March 2019. Available at: http://salt.umd.edu/T-RACES/fha.html 21 Lipsitz, George. 1998. “The Possessive Investment in Whiteness: How White People Profit from Identity Politics.” Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. Cited in “T-Races.” Accessed March 2019. Available at:
http://salt.umd.edu/T-RACES/holc.html
22 HOLC Area Description Files, Areas A-14 and A-17. April 1939. “T-RACES.” Accessed March 2019. Available at:
http://salt.umd.edu/T-RACES/demo/demo.html
23 HOLC Area Description Files, Areas A-14 and A-17. April 1939. “T-RACES.” Accessed March 2019. Available at:
http://salt.umd.edu/T-RACES/demo/demo.html
PAGE 85 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 8 focused on San Marino as the ideal place to raise a family, with safe streets, fresh air, reasonably priced homes, and good schools with comfortably white and upper-class students who “are drawn from the sort of homes that you will live in, and will grow up to be the men and women that your children will meet in the business and social world.”24 The tactic seems to have worked, as shown by a 1938 report by the city building inspector showing an average of one family a day was moving into a new home in San Marino.25 The same report noted that building permit valuations indicated “a definite trend towards smaller home construction.”26
The U.S. entered World War II in 1941. New construction in San Marino slowed in 1942 and came to a screeching halt in 1943 due to the wartime building moratorium. Between 1943 and 1945, permits were granted for only three new buildings; additions and alteration work were all that was allowed, and their total valuations were quite low in comparison to those in 1940- 1941.27,28,29 Construction would not resume again until after the war. 24 Display ad. 17 April 1938. Los Angeles Times.
25 “Steady Influx of Families into San Marino Shown by Report.” 17 April 1938. Los Angeles Times. 26 “Steady Influx of Families into San Marino Shown by Report.” 17 April 1938. Los Angeles Times. 27 “Building Shows Big Decrease.” 6 January 1944. San Marino Tribune (San Marino, CA). 28 “S.M. Building Shows Increase Over Last Year.” 8 February 1945. San Marino Tribune (San Marino, CA). 29 “Building Permits Show Big Gain Over Last Year.” 2 January 1947. San Marino Tribune (San Marino, CA).

PAGE 86 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 9 SECTION 6

PROPERTY HISTORY

6.1 CURRENT SETTING
The setting surrounding the parcel is single-family residential. The parcel is located on a curved street between El Molino Avenue to the east and Los Robles Avenue to the west (Figures 1A–B, Setting, Old Mill Road; Figure 2, Sketch Map; Figure 3, Project Location Map).

Figure 1A. Setting, Old Mill Road (view facing east)
SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2021
Figure 1B. Setting, Old Mill Road (view facing west)
SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2021
PAGE 87 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 10 Figure 2. Sketch Map
SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2021
PAGE 88 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 11 Figure 3. Project Location Map
SOURCE: U.S. Geological Survey, 1994
PAGE 89 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 12

6.2 ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION
The subject property includes a single-family residence constructed in 1932. The single-story Spanish Colonial Revival-style residence faces Old Mill Road, measures 1,751 square feet, and features an ‘L’-shaped footprint. The subject property is clad in stucco. The building has a combination roofline; design styles visible from the public right-of-way include a low-pitched cross-gabled roof clad in terracotta tile (Figure 4, Primary Façade). The entryway to the property is accessible via a brick walkway that extends from the street to a radiused concrete porch, also clad in red tile. The porch remains minimally covered by the horizontal roofline.

Figure 4. Primary Façade (view facing north)
SOURCE: Sapphos Environmental, Inc., 2021
The primary façade remains stuccoed and contains two, rectangular, fixed windows. Each window visible on the primary façade is recessed and framed in wood. One fixed window flanks the entry on the western end of the façade, and the main large window contains a metal window box. Extant wrought-metal décor includes porch handrailing and wall-mounted light fixtures. The roofline contains painted rain gutters and drains that discharge rainwater into the lawn.

Based on photographs from historic aerials and Google Earth, the western façade contains numerous square windows. Additional reviews of property photographs indicate two extant windows on the eastern façade of the subject property. The photographs did not provide sufficient views to determine specific window style and construction material. However, a review of City building permits does not indicate substantial alteration to extant windows were made. A concrete-block wall separates the subject property from the adjacent neighbor to the west.

Over the course of time, the subject property has not undergone substantial change to essential character-defining features. A detailed list of building permits remains available in the following section that encompasses building history specific to the subject property.

PAGE 90 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 13

6.3 BUILDING HISTORY

6.3.1 Construction History
The subject property is located in the City within Tract No. 8687, a subdivision of Rancho Los Robles and a portion of the Hardison Tract. The tract was owned by the First Trust and Savings Bank of Pasadena, and surveyed in August 1924 by Los Angeles civil engineer, Earle R. Bunker.30 The tract and subdivision of it consisted of 117 lots of various sizes and footprints. The subject property was constructed in 1932, and according to building permits, the original architect, if any, is unknown.

Building permits indicate V.A. Williamson was the contractor regarding the construction of the residence. A ProQuest search of historical issues of the Los Angeles Times and Los Angeles Sentinel in addition to issues of the Billings Gazette, Santa Ana Daily Register, and the City of South Pasadena Foothill Review indicate V.A. Williamson was a contractor whose building services were utilized throughout Pasadena, San Marino, and Santa Ana. The Montana-based Billings Gazette highlights Williamsons’ work building the J.L. Baird block of the city in 1919.31 In addition to his work in Montana, the Santa Ana Daily Register indicates Williamson arrived in Southern California from Colorado in 1925.32 Williamson is not featured in historic issues of the Southwest Builder and Contractor nor is the subject property featured in historic issues of Architectural Digest. There is no further information available regarding the life of V.A. Williamson. The subject property is not mentioned in any newspaper publication beyond real estate advertisements over the course of time and it received no mention in architectural or construction trade publications as well. Therefore, the subject property does not appear to have been a significant construction project in the City.

6.3.2 Permit History33
The original building permits for the construction of the building were provided by the City. The building permits regarding original construction indicate a proposed construction date of 1928.

Assessor records indicate the property was completed in 1932. The building permits issued by the City indicate various alteration and repairs made to the extant property ranging from 1928/32 to 2009 (Table 1, Building Permit History).
30 City of San Marino Tract Map 8687.
31 The Billings Gazette. 17 June 1919. Interstate News Montana-Wyoming. 32 The Santa Ana Daily Register. 22 December 1925.
33 All permits supplied by Christina Baker from the City of San Marino Planning Department in PDF format, October 2021.

PAGE 91 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 14 TABLE 1

BUILDING PERMIT HISTORY
Date Permit No. Description of Work
June 1928/1932 1415 Construction of a single-story 54×40 “Spanish Colonial” singlefamily residence 12/16/1948 6539 5’6” concrete garden wall
12/16/1948 6540 12’×14’concrete shed located on the rear of the lot 6/14/1957 10939 Roof tile repair
12/2/1968 8007 Construct a 4’ chain link fence and gate 3/6/1969 8530 Re-roof a portion of the residence
1/4/1971 13024 Roof tile repair
8/03/1973 20402 Roof tile repair
6/15/2009 084803 Re-roof entire residence
The Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps do not cover this area of the City. Historic aerials photographs of the property were reviewed dating back to 1948 and show the footprint of the building which appears to generally be the same.

6.4 OWNERSHIP/OCCUPANT HISTORY
The Los Angeles County Assessor’s parcel data was not available at the time this report was prepared and was not reviewed for the subject property. Based on the permit history, previous owners include (Table 2, Ownership History):

TABLE 2

OWNERSHIP HISTORY
Year Name
1932 Mr. A.H. Bothe
1947 J.P. McMahon
1950–1962 Eben Cameron
1965–1969 John Freeman
1996–2009 Ginte Jasulaitis
2009–2021 Patty Chan
The first owner of the property was Dr. Arthur H. Bothe. Ancestry records estimate Bothe was born in 1895.
34 According to Ancestry records, Dr. Bothe was a high school teacher and junior varsity baseball coach at South Pasadena-San Marino High School as early as 1927.35 Bothe was born in Missouri, and Ancestry records indicate he received his formal education through college in Missouri prior to moving to Los Angeles. There is no further information available regarding the life of Bothe.

Building permits from 1947 indicate J.P. Mc Mahon as the property owner. There is no substantial information available in the Ancestry database regarding the life of J.P. McMahon. Building permits indicate Eben Cameron as the listed owner from 1950 to 1962. Ancestry records indicate Cameron 34 Ancestry. Year: 1940; Census Place: San Gabriel, Los Angeles, California; Roll: m-t0627-00254; Page: 8B; Enumeration District: 19-703.
35 Ancestry. Year: 1927; "U.S., School Yearbooks, 1880-2012"; School Name: South Pasadena-San Marino High School.

PAGE 92 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 15 was born in San Francisco in 1893.36 According to the Pasadena Independent, Cameron was a 22- year resident of the San Marino and Pasadena area.37 John Freeman owned the subject property between 1965 and 1969. There is no information available regarding the life of John Freeman specific to the subject property. Building permit records and Ancestry records indicate the subject property was owned by Ginte Jasulaitas from 1996 to 2009.38 Jasulaitis is a doctor and currently resides in the City of Carmel. The subject property is currently owned by Ms. Patty Chan. All ownership information regarding the subject property was found based on reviews of Ancestry database searches, newspapers.com, and historic issues of the Los Angeles Times and Los Angeles Sentinel via ProQuest.

6.5 USE HISTORY
The property was built as a single-family residence and is currently being used as such. 36 Ancestry. 2000. ”California, U.S., Death Index, 1940-1997 [database on-line].” Provo, UT: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.
37 Pasadena Independent. 19 October 1967.
38 Ancestry. 2010. “U.S., Public Records Index, 1950-1993, Volume 1 [database on-line].” Lehi, UT: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.

PAGE 93 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 16 SECTION 7

REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
The buildings associated with the subject property were evaluated to determine if they constitute a historical resource as defined by CEQA, using the eligibility criteria for listing in applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations.

7.1 FEDERAL
The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, defines the criteria to be considered eligible for listing in the National Register:

The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association and A. that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or
B. that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or C. that embody distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or
D. that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history (36 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Section part 63).

According to National Register Bulletin No. 15, “to be eligible for listing in the National Register, a property must not only be shown to be significant under National Register criteria, but it also must have integrity.” Integrity is defined in National Register Bulletin No. 15 as “the ability of a property to convey its significance.”39 Within the concept of integrity, the National Register recognizes the following seven aspects or qualities that in various combinations define integrity: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. 39 National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. 2017. “How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation.” National Register Bulletin. Available at: https://www.nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/nrb15/ PAGE 94 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 17

7.2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Section 5024.1(c), Title 14 CCR, Section 4852 of the California Public Resources Code defines the criteria to be considered eligible for listing in the California Register:

A resource may be listed as an historical resource in the California Register if it meets any of the following [National Register] criteria:

1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage;

2. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past;

3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or

4. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.

Section 4852(C) of the California Code of Regulations40 defines integrity as follows:

Integrity is the authenticity of an historical resource's physical identity evidenced by the survival of characteristics that existed during the resource's period of significance. Historical resources eligible for listing in the California Register must meet one of the criteria of significance described in section 4852(b) of this chapter and retain enough of their historic character or appearance to be recognizable as historical resources and to convey the reasons for their significance. Historical resources that have been rehabilitated or restored may be evaluated for listing.

Integrity is evaluated with regard to the retention of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. It must also be judged with reference to the particular criteria under which a resource is proposed for eligibility. Alterations over time to a resource or historic changes in its use may themselves have historical, cultural, or architectural significance.
40 California Office of Historic Preservation. 1999. California State Law and Historic Preservation, 4853 (c), 66.

PAGE 95 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 18

7.3 CITY OF SAN MARINO
Section 23.18.030 of Article 18 of the Historic Preservation Ordinance No. 0-18-1336 defined the designation criteria for Historic Landmarks:41
A. The Council may designate a historic resource a Historic Landmark if it meets the requirements of both paragraphs B and C of this section.

B. Historic landmarks must meet at least one of the following criteria:

3. It is or was once associated or identified with important events or broad patterns of development that have made a significant contribution to the cultural, architectural, historical, and political heritage of the City, region, state, or nation; or

4. It is or was associated with an important person or persons who made a significant contribution to the history, development, or culture of the City, region, state, or nation; or

5. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction; exemplifies the work of a well-recognized architect or builder or possesses high artistic or aesthetic values; or it represents one of the last, best remaining examples of an architectural type or style in a neighborhood or the City that was once common but is now increasingly rare.

C. Historic landmarks must retain integrity from their period of significance with respect to its location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, association, or any combination of these factors. A proposed landmark need not retain all such original aspects, but must retain sufficient integrity to convey its historic, cultural, or architectural significance. Neither the deferred maintenance of a proposed landmark nor its dilapidated condition shall, on its own, be equated with a loss of integrity.

Integrity shall be judged with reference to the particular characteristics that support the property’s eligibility.
41 City of San Marino. 11 April 2018. City Council Agenda. Accessed May 16, 2018. Available at: http://www.ci.sanmarino.ca.us/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_04112018-1034 PAGE 96 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 19 SECTION 8

HISTORIC CONTEXT
The property was evaluated using the Citywide Historic Context Statement developed by ARG for the City; specifically, the Residential Development, 1931–1945 and Spanish Colonial Revival-style Themes.
42 8.1 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, 1931–1945
Context: San Marino on the Great Depression and Wartime, 1931–1945 Theme: Residential Development, 1931–1945
Property Type(s): Single-family residences; ancillary buildings and structures like servants’ quarters, garages, porte-cochères, and pool houses; features related directly to subdivision development, including entrance markers, street lamps, street trees, curbs, sidewalks, and walls; vernacular landscapes reflecting residential occupations (possibly including small relic orange groves, orchards, or vineyards); designed landscapes like estate grounds (including unified features like perimeter walls, retaining walls, steps, walkways, roads, driveways, gates, water features, and gardens); and geographically unified groupings of residential properties (historic districts).

Area(s) of Significance: As the site of a significant historic event from this period; for its association with patterns of residential development in the City; as the site of a significant historic event from this period; for its association with a person (or persons) significant in the history of the City.

Criteria: NR: A/B CR: 1/2 Local: 1/2
Period of Significance: 1931–1945
Eligibility Standards:
• Date to the period of significance (1931–1945)
• Retain the essential aspects of integrity
o Retain enough of its essential physical features to sufficiently convey its association with the historic context
o Retain the majority (60 percent or more) of the contributors dating to the period of significance
o Retain enough of its essential physical features to sufficiently convey its association with the historic context
• Be directly associated with the notable person’s productive period—the time during which she or he attained significance
42 City of San Marino. October 2020. “San Marino Citywide Historic Resources Survey Report.” Prepared by:

Architectural Resources Group, Pasadena, CA. Available at https://www.cityofsanmarino.org/planning/Historic%20Survey/San%20Marino%20Historic%20Resources%20Surve y%20Report%20FINAL%2010.6.20.pdf
PAGE 97 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 20 Integrity Considerations: A property that is significant as the site of a significant historic event is eligible if it retains the essential physical features that comprised its character or appearance during the period of its association with the important event. A residential property from this period should retain integrity of location, feeling, and association, at a minimum, in order to convey the important association with the city’s development during this period. A property that has lost integrity of setting may still be eligible. A property that has lost some historic materials or details may still be eligible if it retains the majority of the features that illustrate its original style and appearance in terms of the massing, spatial relationships, proportion, and fenestration pattern. A property is not eligible if it retains some basic features conveying form and massing but has lost the majority of features that characterized its appearance during its historical period.

A property that is significant for its association with a significant person should retain integrity of location, design, feeling, and association, at a minimum, in order to convey its historic association with a significant individual.

In order for a historic district to be eligible for designation, the majority of the components within the district boundary must possess integrity, as must the district as a whole. Integrity of design, setting, and feeling must be strongly present in the district overall, and it should convey a strong sense of time and place. A contributing building must retain integrity of location, design, setting, feeling, and association to adequately convey the significance of the historic district.

In general, minor or reversible alterations or in-kind replacement of original features and finishes are acceptable within historic districts. Significant alterations that change the massing, form, roofline, or fenestration patterns of an individual building, alter the original design intent, or that are not reversible may result in non-contributing status for an individual building. In order for a historic district to retain integrity, the majority (60 percent or more) of its component parts should contribute to its historic significance.

8.2 ARCHITECTURE AND DESIGN, 1870–1980
Context: Architecture and Design, 1870–1980
Theme: Spanish Colonial Revival
Property Type(s): Significant interpretations of architectural styles can be applied to nearly any property type. In San Marino, examples include single-family residences; commercial buildings like banks, office buildings, restaurants, and retail buildings; institutional properties like government buildings, clubhouses, schools, and churches; and designed landscapes (residential and institutional). Concentrations of buildings that collectively convey a significant representation of architectural style(s) or type(s) may be identified as historic districts.

Area(s) of Significance: An individual property eligible under this theme may be significant:
• As an excellent embodiment of an architectural style, type, period, or method of construction; and/or
• As the notable work of a master architect or builder; and/or • For possessing high artistic or aesthetic values; and/or • As one of the last, best remaining examples of a type or style in a neighborhood or the City that is increasingly rare.

PAGE 98 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 21 Criteria: NR: C CR: 3 Local: 3
Period of Significance: 1920s–1930s
Character-defining features of Spanish Colonial Revival-style architecture include:
• Complex massing and asymmetrical façades
• Incorporation of patios, courtyards, loggias, or covered porches and/or balconies • Low‐pitched gable or hipped roofs with clay tile roofing • Hipped or gable roofs, typically with boxed eaves
• Coved, molded, or wood‐bracketed eaves
• Towers or turrets
• Stucco wall cladding
• Arched window and door openings
• Single and paired multi‐paned windows (predominantly casement) • Decorative stucco or tile vents
• Used of secondary materials, including wrought iron, wood, cast stone, terra cotta, and pol ychromatic tile
Integrity Considerations: An individual property significant for its architecture is eligible if it retains most of the physical features that constitute its style or technique. It should retain integrity of design, materials, workmanship, and feeling, at a minimum, in order to be eligible for its architectural merit.

A property that has lost a few historic materials or details may still be eligible if it retains the majority of the features that illustrate its original style and appearance in terms of the massing, spatial relationships, proportion, pattern of windows and doors, texture of materials, and ornamentation. A property is not eligible if it retains some basic features conveying form and massing but has lost the majority of features that originally characterized its style or type. Given the City’s vast stock of intact historic architecture, properties that may be significant for their embodiment of an architectural style should be held to a higher integrity standard than those that may be significant as the last, best remaining example of a style or type.

An individual property that is significant must also retain certain aspects of integrity in order to express its historic significance. Determining which aspects are most important to a particular property type necessitates an understanding of its significance and essential physical characteristics.

The rarity of a property type and of an architectural style should also be considered when assessing integrity. In general, properties being evaluated for their architectural significance are held to a higher integrity threshold than those being evaluated under other contexts.

PAGE 99 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 22 SECTION 9

EVALUATION OF ELIGIBILITY

9.1 NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
National Register Criterion A
The subject property was developed as part of a residential Tract No. 8687. The tract was surveyed in 1924. The subject property is a modest example of a Spanish Colonial Revival-style residence constructed in 1932, eight years after the tract was initially platted. The subject property is a rather modest example of a Spanish Colonial Revival-style residence in the City. Aside from being constructed within the period of significance, the subject property does not appear in newspapers beyond real estate advertisements. There is no information available to suggest the subject property stood apart from other residences constructed during the period of significance. The subject property was not constructed for a client of any particular significance. The subject property is a rather modest example of a Spanish Colonial Revival-style building constructed during the period of significance, 1931–1945. There is no information available to suggest it was a significant construction project that stood out from other residential construction during the period of significance and does not appear to be a significant development within national, state, or local historic narratives. Therefore, the subject property does not appear to be eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion A.

National Register Criterion B
Arthur Bothe was the original owner of the property and aside from living in the City and working in nearby Pasadena, Bothe does not appear historically significant. There is no information available to suggest that any of the previous owners or residents are historic personages who made demonstrably significant contributions to the history of the nation, state, or region, or that any other individuals of historical significance are associated with the property. Therefore, the subject property is ineligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion B.

National Register Criterion C
The subject property, a Spanish-Colonial Revival residence, was constructed in 1932. The architect, if any, of the project is unknown. Therefore, the subject property does not appear to be the work of a master architect. V.A. Williamson is listed as a contractor associated with the construction of the subject property. Based on newspaper research, Williamson operated throughout Southern California, particularly Pasadena, San Marino, and various surrounding communities. There is no information specific to or associated with Williamson’s building projects. Williamson is not identified in historic issues of Southwest Builder and Contractor. The subject property is not featured in historic issues of Architectural Digest. Local newspapers articles indicate Williams was contracted by Arthur Bothe to construct the subject property. There is no additional information available to suggest that Williamson was a master builder or tradesman. Therefore, the subject property does not appear to be a significant example of the style that would merit a mention in architectural and construction trade publications. The subject property is a common, low-style example of a SpanishColonial Revival single-family residence. Based on the overall commonality of the subject property and modest styling, it is safe to assert that it does not rise above the level of workmanship of other properties of the same style within the City. The subject property is not the best representation of the period of significance; therefore, the subject property does not appear to be eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion C.

PAGE 100 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 23 National Register Criterion D
Criterion D is not considered in this report as it generally applies to archaeological resources.

Additionally, there is no reason to believe the property has the potential to yield important information regarding prehistory or history.

9.2 CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES
The California Register eligibility criteria mirror those of the National Register. Therefore, the subject property is not eligible for listing in the California Register for the same reasons outlined above.

9.3 CITY OF SAN MARINO HISTORIC LANDMARK
Similarly, the San Marino Historic Landmark eligibility criteria mirror those of the National Register and California Register criteria. Therefore, the subject property is not eligible for designation as an Historic Landmark for the same reasons outlined above.

9.4 CITY OF SAN MARINO HISTORIC DISTRICT
The subject property was evaluated as a potential contributor to the potentially eligible Mission Street Residential Historic District identified by ARG in the Citywide Survey. Yet, the subject property does not convey an association with a significant development pattern within the City during this time due to it being built after residential development boom of the 1920s. San Marino had seen heavy residential construction during the 1920s, averaging over 150 new buildings per year and reaching a height of 212 new buildings in 1927, valued (along with additions/alterations to existing buildings) at over $3 million.137 In contrast, its average between 1931 and 1934 was only 55 new buildings per year, with a low of only 44 new buildings and a valuation of $433,672 in 1934. The construction rate was about a third of what it was during the 1920s boom, while the valuation was about a seventh—this indicates that not only were fewer buildings built, but they were likely smaller and more modest than those that came before. It is clear that San Marino’s development slowed during the worst years of the Great Depression, just as development slowed across the nation, but it did not stop completely.43 The subject property is a common, low-style example of a Spanish-Colonial Revival-style of architecture, is not designed by a master architect, and not built for a prominent resident. According to the Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor, the subject property is one of six Spanish Colonial Revival residences on the same block. Neighboring properties were constructed between 1924 and 1927. The construction of the surrounding properties appears to be more closely associated with residential development in the City between 1913 and 1930. The subject property was added to the predominantly developed tract in 1932. In addition to being a latter addition, the subject property is not an excellent example of the style on the block. In addition to being the least noted property on the 500 block of Old Mill Road, additional properties were constructed in the 1950s and are examples of the ubiquitous Ranch-style homes found throughout the City. The potentially eligible district contains over 200 potentially eligible contributors. The 500 block alone contains four potentially eligible Spanish Colonial Revival-style contributors that are excellent examples of the style and are closely associated with residential development in the City.

Contributors include 550 Old Mill Rd (3D,3CD, 5D3), 555 Old Mil Rd (3D,3CD,5D3), 575 Old Mill Rd (3D, 3CD, 5D3), 575 Old Mill Rd (3D, 3CD, 5D3), and 595 Old Mill Rd (3D, 3CD, 5D3). Overall, 43 City San Marino. April 2020. San Marino Historic Context Statement Draft. Prepared by: Architectural Resources Group, Pasadena, CA. Available at: https://www.cityofsanmarino.org/DocumentCenter/View/4569/San-MarinoHistoric-Context-Statement-Draft-4119e PAGE 101 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 24 the loss of this one modest Spanish-Colonial Residence that is not found to bare historic significance beyond being constructed in 1932 would not result in a negative impact to the potentially eligible Mission Street Residential District. To determine the significance and eligibility, the entire district would need to be evaluated. A complete evaluation of each property within the district is beyond the scope of this evaluation but is assumed to qualify for designation as a historic district for the purposes of this study. Therefore, the proposed project was reviewed against the Standards to determine if it would result in an indirect visual impact to the potential historic district.

9.5 IMPACT ANALYSIS
The proposed project meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, No. 9.

Standard No. 9 states:
“New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment”44 The proposed new construction of a 2,695-square-foot residence would not result in a substantial adverse change to the potentially eligible Mission Street Residential Historic District. The proposed project was preliminarily reviewed by the City of San Marino. The proposed project does not aim to create a false sense of history by recreating building features found on neighboring buildings. The project will not obscure the visibility of neighboring buildings to the north and south. The newly constructed building will be erected below the allowable maximum building height requirements.

Therefore, the project will not stick out above extant buildings on the north side of Old Mill Road and will not alter the linear massing of the block. The proposed project will include building materials that are complimentary and compatible to extant buildings within the Mission Street Historic Residential Historic District. Building materials and features include a low-pitched hip roof, second level dormers, painted brick façades, front porch columns, and cedar shake type cement roof tiles. Additionally, the subject property does not appear to be a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines. The proposed project would not result in a substantial adverse change to historical resources pursuant to Section 15064.5(b) of the CEQA Guidelines. 44 National Parks Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. “Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation.” Available at: https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards.htm
PAGE 102 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 25 SECTION 10

CONCLUSIONS
Based on the research and analysis, the subject property located at 535 Old Mill Road does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National Register, California Register, or for designation as an Historic Landmark. The building was constructed in 1932 but is not associated with significant development patterns within the City (Attachment B, DPR 523 Series Forms). The subject property is not designed by a master architect or constructed by a master builder and is a common and low-style example of the Spanish-Colonial Revival-style residence. Additionally, the subject property does not contribute to a potential historic district. The proposed project was evaluated against the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and complies with the Standards and would not result in a substantial adverse change to historical resources pursuant to Section 15064.5(b) of the CEQA Guidelines.

PAGE 103 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 26 SECTION 11

REFERENCES
Ames, David L. and Linda Flint McClelland. 2002. National Register Bulletin: Historic Residential Suburbs: Guidelines for Evaluation and Documentation for the National Register of Historic Places,” 49. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service.

Ancestry. 2000. ”California, U.S., Death Index, 1940-1997 [database on-line].” Provo, UT:

Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.

Ancestry. 2010. “U.S., Public Records Index, 1950-1993, Volume 1 [database on-line].” Lehi, UT:

Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.

Ancestry. Year: 1927; "U.S., School Yearbooks, 1880-2012"; School Name: South Pasadena-San Marino High School.

Ancestry. Year: 1940; Census Place: San Gabriel, Los Angeles, California; Roll: m-t0627-00254; Page: 8B; Enumeration District: 19-703.

Baker, Christina, City of San Marino Planning Department. October 2021. Permits “Building Inspector’s Report,” in the William Hertrich Papers, 1904–1966. San Marino, CA: The Huntington Library; “Data Show Growth.”
“Building Permits Show Big Gain Over Last Year.” 2 January 1947. San Marino Tribune (San Marino, CA).
“Building Shows Big Decrease.” 6 January 1944. San Marino Tribune (San Marino, CA). “Building Two Million During 1941.” 8 January 1942. San Marino Tribune (San Marino, CA).

California Office of Historic Preservation. 1999. California State Law and Historic Preservation, 4853 (c), 66.

City of Los Angeles. 2016. “Context: Jewish History” in “SurveyLA Los Angeles Citywide Historic Context Statement,” 13. Prepared by: GPA Consulting, El Segundo, CA and Becky Nicolaides.

City of San Marino Tract Map 8687.

City of San Marino. 11 April 2018. City Council Agenda. Accessed May 16, 2018. Available at:
http://www.ci.san-marino.ca.us/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_04112018-1034 City of San Marino. 2020. City of San Marino Historic Citywide Survey Map. City of San Marino.

Prepared by: Architectural Resources Group, Pasadena, CA. Available at:
https://www.cityofsanmarino.org/DocumentCenter/View/4570/San-Marino-Recon-Map61319 City of San Marino. October 2020. “San Marino Citywide Historic Resources Survey Report.” Prepared by: Architectural Resources Group, Pasadena, CA. Available at https://www.cityofsanmarino.org/planning/Historic%20Survey/San%20Marino%20Historic %20Resources%20Survey%20Report%20FINAL%2010.6.20.pdf
PAGE 104 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 27 City of San Marino. Updated 15 May 2020 (working document). “San Marino Historical Resources Survey ‐ Preliminary List of Properties to be Surveyed ‐ DISTRICTS.” Available at:
https://www.cityofsanmarino.org/planning/Historic%20Survey/San%20Marino%20Property %20List%20-%20Districts%20-%205.15.20.pdf
City San Marino. April 2020. San Marino Historic Context Statement Draft. Prepared by:

Architectural Resources Group, Pasadena, CA. Available Available at:
https://www.cityofsanmarino.org/DocumentCenter/View/4569/San-Marino-HistoricContext-Statement-Draft-4119 “County Vacancy Ratio Now Lowest Since 1924.” 23 February 1941. Los Angeles Times. “Development Plans Prepared for New San Marino Tract.” 22 January 1939. Los Angeles Times. “Development Plans Prepared.” 23 October 1938. Los Angeles Times.

Hescher, Uri and Pete McCloskey cited in “Courage and Cowardice in San Marino,” Matt Hormann, Hometown Pasadena. Accessed March 2019. Available at: http://hometownpasadena.com/history/courage-and-cowardice-in-sanmarino/97684 HOLC Area Description Files, Areas A-14 and A-17. April 1939. “T-RACES.” Accessed March 2019. Available at: http://salt.umd.edu/T-RACES/demo/demo.html “Homesites Bought; Residences to Rise.” 23 October 1938. Los Angeles Times.

Lipsitz, George. 1998. “The Possessive Investment in Whiteness: How White People Profit from Identity Politics.” Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. Cited in “T-Races.” Accessed March 2019. Available at: http://salt.umd.edu/T-RACES/holc.html Los Angeles Times. 17 April 1938. Display ad.

Marciano, R., D. Goldberg, and C. Hou. “T-RACES: a Testbed for the Redlining Archives of California's Exclusionary Spaces: Beyond HOLC.” Accessed March 2019. Available at:
http://salt.umd.edu/T-RACES/fha.html
National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. 2017. “How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation.” National Register Bulletin. Available at:
https://www.nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/nrb15/
National Parks Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. “Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation.” Available at: https://www.nps.gov/tps/standards.htm “New Street Expands Tract.” 14 January 1940. Los Angeles Times.

Pasadena Independent. 19 October 1967.

Rodman, Edmon J. 9 April 2014. “Let My People Go…to Hancock Park.” Jewish Journal. “S.M. Building Shows Increase Over Last Year.” 8 February 1945. San Marino Tribune (San Marino, CA).
“San Marino Model to Open.” 29 September 1940. Los Angeles Times.

PAGE 105 of 341
535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California Historical Resources Assessment Report July 25, 2022 Sapphos Environmental, Inc.

W:\Projects\2645\2645-001\Documents\535 Old Mill Road_HRAR.docx Page 28 “Steady Influx of Families into San Marino Shown by Report.” 17 April 1938. Los Angeles Times.

The Billings Gazette. 17 June 1919. Interstate News Montana-Wyoming.

The Santa Ana Daily Register. 22 December 1925.

PAGE 106 of 341

ATTACHMENT A

RESUME OF KEY PERSONNEL
PAGE 107 of 341
Scott E. Torres, MA
Architectural Historian
Master of Arts, History,
California State University
Fullerton, Fullerton, CA,
2020
• History
• Architecture
• California History
• Historic Preservation
• Cultural Survey
Years of Experience: 3+
• Historic Resource
Documentation and
Evaluations for Sierra
Madre Ca, Hollywood,
San Marino, Ontario,
Fontana, Glendale, and
Los Angeles
• High Speed Rail
Construction Package 4
• Society of Architectural
Historians Member
Mr. Scott Torres has more than three years of experience in the field of historic research and writing, including primary and secondary source analysis, conducting oral history interviews, peer review, and editing.

Mr. Torres has served as a project architectural historian and conducted historic assessments in the Cities of Los Angeles, including Hollywood, San Marino, Los Angeles, Orange, and surrounding communities within Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties. Mr. Torres has conducted a historic resource evaluation of the Little Tokyo Towers as part of a historic resource assessment report in support of the Los Angeles Office of Historic Resources.

Additional resource assessments in Hollywood include early Craftsman residences and the Period Revival Bungalow Court Apartments associated with early development and the
entertainment industry. On behalf of the County of Los Angeles, Mr.

Torres provided research and documentation on unincorporated East LA’s Unique Theater, in support of its nomination for Historic Landmark designation. Mr. Torres has also provided historic documentation and literature review in support of the Los Angeles Music Center Electric Replacement Project; the project included an impact assessment regarding identified historic resources located within the music center campus. Additionally, Mr. Torres has conducted research in support of residential design reviews in the Cities of Glendale, San Marino, and Hollywood. Mr. Torres has also provided cultural resources support for the High-Speed Rail (HSR) Construction Package (CP) 4.

Mr. Torres has conducted Department of Parks and Recreation documentation and evaluations in support of site assessments in the Cities of Sierra Madre, Monrovia, Hollywood, Los Angeles, and Ontario. This work includes site photographs, database research, and map review.

Mr. Torres is a member of the Society of Architectural Historians.

PAGE 108 of 341

ATTACHMENT B
DPR 523 SERIES FORMS
PAGE 109 of 341
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code: 6Z
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
Attachments: ☐ NONE ☒ Location Map ☐ Sketch Map ☒ Continuation Sheet ☒ Building, Structure, and Object Record ☐ Archaeological Record ☐ District Record ☐ Linear Feature Record ☐ Milling Station Record ☐ Rock Art Record ☐ Artifact Record ☐ Photograph Record ☐ Other (List):

DPR 523A (9/2013) *Required information

Page 1 of 10 ends

P1. Other Identifier: None
*P2. Location: ☐ Not for Publication ☒ Unrestricted
*a. County: Los Angeles and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: El Monte Date: 1994 T1S; R12W; of of Sec B.M. c. Address: 535 Old Mill Road City: San Marino Zip: 91108 d. UTM (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone: , mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate): APN 5325-005-025 *P3a. Description (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries):

The subject property includes a single-family residence constructed in 1932. The single-story Spanish Colonial Revival-style residence faces Old Mill Road, measures 1,751 square feet, and features an ‘L’-shaped footprint. The subject property is clad in stucco. The building has a combination roofline; design styles visible from the public right-of-way include a low-pitched cross-gabled roof clad in terracotta tile. The entryway to the property is accessible via a brick walkway that extends from the street to a radiused concrete porch, also clad in red tile. The porch remains minimally covered by the horizontal roofline. (See Continuation Sheet page 4) *P3b. Resource Attributes (List attributes and codes): HP2 Single-Family Property *P4. Resources Present: ☒Building ☐Structure ☐Object ☐Site ☐District ☐Element of District ☐Other (Isolates, etc.) P5b. Description of Photo (view, date, accession #):

Southern Façade
View North
October 27, 2021
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Source:
☒Historic ☐Prehistoric ☐Both
1932 LA County Assessor
*P7. Owner and Address:

Ms. Patty Chan
535 Old Mill Road
San Marino, CA 91108
*P8. Recorded by (Name, affiliation, and address):

Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
430 N. Halstead Street
Pasadena, CA 91107
*P9. Date Recorded: October 27, 2021

*P10. Survey Type (Describe): Intensive
*P11. Report Citation (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none"): Sapphos Environmental, Inc. November 2021. Historical Resources Assessment Report for 535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, California 91108 P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings, structures, and objects.) PAGE 110 of 341
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder): 535 Old Mill Road *NRHP Status Code: 6Z

Page 2 of 10 ends

DPR 523B (9/2013) *Required information
B1. Historic Name: 535 Old Mill Road
B2. Common Name: 535 Old Mill Road
B3. Original Use: Single-family residence B4. Present Use: Single-family residence *B5. Architectural Style: Spanish Colonial Revival
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) The subject property is located in the City within Tract No. 8687, a subdivision of Rancho Los Robles and a portion of the Hardison Tract. The tract was owned by the First Trust and Savings Bank of Pasadena, and surveyed in August 1924 by Los Angeles civil engineer, Earle R. Bunker. The tract and subdivision of it consisted of 117 lots of various sizes and footprints. The subject property was constructed in 1932, and according to building permits, the original architect, if any, is unknown. Building permits indicate V.A. Williamson was the contractor regarding the construction of the residence (See Continuation Sheet page 5) *B7. Moved? ☒ No ☐ Yes ☐ Unknown Date: N/A Original Location: N/A *B8. Related Features: N/A
B9a. Architect: N/A b. Builder: V.A. Williamson
*B10. Significance: Theme: Spanish Colonial Revival Area: San Marino Period of Significance: 1932 Property Type: Residence Applicable Criteria: N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)
The period of significance pertaining to Spanish Colonial Revival buildings was 1915-1940. The subject property was constructed in 1932. The City of San Marino experience a slow in residential development due to the Great Depression and the onset of World War II, 1931-1945. (See Continuation Sheet page 6)
B11. Additional Resource Attributes (List attributes and codes): N/A *B12. References: See Continuation Sheet page 8.
*B13. Remarks: N/A
*B14. Evaluator:

Scott Torres
Sapphos Environmental, Inc.
430 N. Halstead Street
Pasadena, CA 91107
*Date of Evaluation: October 27, 2021
(Sketch Map with north arrow required.)
(This space reserved for official comments.)
PAGE 111 of 341
State of California ⎯ Natural Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LOCATION MAP Trinomial
DPR 523J (Rev. 1/1995) (Word 9/2013) * Required information

Page 3 of 10 ends

*Map Name: El Monte *Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of map: 1994 PAGE 112 of 341
State of California ⎯ Natural Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
DPR 523L (9/2013) *Required information

Page 4 of 10 ends

*P3a. Description: (Continued from Primary Record page 1) The subject property includes a single-family residence constructed in 1932. The single-story Spanish Colonial Revival-style residence faces Old Mill Road, measures 1,751 square feet, and features an ‘L’-shaped footprint. The subject property is clad in stucco. The building has a combination roofline; design styles visible from the public right-of-way include a low-pitched cross-gabled roof clad in terracotta tile. The entryway to the property is accessible via a brick walkway that extends from the street to a radiused concrete porch, also clad in red tile. The porch remains minimally covered by the horizontal roofline.

Primary Façade (north)
The primary façade remains stuccoed and contains two, rectangular, fixed windows. Each window visible on the primary façade is recessed and framed in wood. One fixed window flanks the entry on the western end of the façade, and the main large window contains a metal window box. Extant wrought-metal décor includes porch handrailing and wall-mounted light fixtures. The roofline contains painted rain gutters and drains that discharge rainwater into the lawn.

PAGE 113 of 341
State of California ⎯ Natural Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
DPR 523L (9/2013) *Required information

Page 5 of 10 ends

*B6. Construction History: (Continuation from Building, Structure, Object Report page 2) A ProQuest search of historical issues of the Los Angeles Times and Los Angeles Sentinel in addition to issues of the Billings Gazette, Santa Ana Daily Register, and the City of South Pasadena Foothill Review indicate V.A. Williamson was a contractor whose building services were utilized throughout Pasadena, San Marino, and Santa Ana. The Montana-based Billings Gazette highlights Williamsons’ work building the J.L. Baird block of the city in 1919. In addition to his work in Montana, the Santa Ana Daily Register indicates Williamson arrived in Southern California from Colorado in 1925. Williamson is not featured in historic issues of the Southwest Builder and Contractor nor is the subject property featured in historic issues of Architectural Digest. There is no further information available regarding the life of V.A. Williamson. The subject property is not mentioned in any newspaper publication beyond real estate advertisements over the course of time and it received no mention in architectural or construction trade publications as well. Therefore, the subject property does not appear to have been a significant construction project in the City.

The original building permits for the construction of the building were provided by the City.

The building permits regarding original construction indicate a proposed construction date of 1928. Assessor records indicate the property was completed in 1932. The building permits issued by the City indicate various alteration and repairs made to the extant property ranging from 1928/32 to 2009
TABLE 1

BUILDING PERMIT HISTORY
Date Permit No. Description of Work
June 1928/1932 1415 Construction of a single-story 54×40 “Spanish Colonial” single-family residence
12/16/1948 6539 5’6” concrete garden wall
12/16/1948 6540 12’×14’concrete shed located on the rear of the lot 6/14/1957 10939 Roof tile repair
12/2/1968 8007 Construct a 4’ chain link fence and gate 3/6/1969 8530 Re-roof a portion of the residence
1/4/1971 13024 Roof tile repair
8/03/1973 20402 Roof tile repair
6/15/2009 084803 Re-roof entire residence
The first owner of the property was Dr. Arthur H. Bothe. Ancestry records estimate Bothe was born in 1895. According to Ancestry records, Dr. Bothe was a high school teacher and junior varsity baseball coach at South Pasadena-San Marino High School as early as 1927. Bothe was born in Missouri, and Ancestry records indicate he received his formal education through college in Missouri prior to moving to Los Angeles. There is no further information available regarding the life of Bothe. Building permits from 1947 indicate J.P. Mc Mahon as the property owner. There is no substantial information available in the Ancestry database regarding the life of J.P. McMahon.

Building permits indicate Eben Cameron as the listed owner from 1950 to 1962. Ancestry records indicate Cameron was born in San Francisco in 1893. According to the Pasadena Independent, Cameron was a 22-year resident of the San Marino and Pasadena area. John Freeman owned the subject property between 1965 and 1969. There is no information available regarding the life of John Freeman specific to the subject property. Building permit records and Ancestry records indicate the subject property was owned by Ginte Jasulaitas from 1996 to 2009. Jasulaitis is a doctor and currently resides in the City of Carmel. The subject property is currently owned by Ms. Patty Chan. All ownership information regarding the subject property was found based on reviews of Ancestry database searches, newspapers.com, and historic issues of the Los Angeles Times and Los Angeles Sentinel via ProQuest.

PAGE 114 of 341
State of California ⎯ Natural Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
DPR 523L (9/2013) *Required information

Page 6 of 10 ends

TABLE 2

OWNERSHIP HISTORY
Year Name
1932 Mr. A.H. Bothe
1947 J.P. McMahon
1950–1962 Eben Cameron
1965–1969 John Freeman
1996–2009 Ginte Jasulaitis
2009–2021 Patty Chan
*B10. Significance: (Continuation from Building, Structure, Object Report page 2) The subject property was developed as part of a residential Tract No. 8687. The tract was surveyed in 1924. The subject property is a modest example of a Spanish Colonial Revival-style residence constructed in 1932, eight years after the tract was initially platted. The subject property is a rather modest example of a Spanish Colonial Revival-style residence in the City.

Aside from being constructed within the period of significance, the subject property does not appear in newspapers beyond real estate advertisements. There is no information available to suggest the subject property stood apart from other residences constructed during the period of significance. The subject property was not constructed for a client of any particular significance. The subject property is a rather modest example of a Spanish Colonial Revivalstyle building constructed during the period of significance, 1931–1945. There is no information available to suggest it was a significant construction project that stood out from other residential construction during the period of significance and does not appear to be a significant development within national, state, or local historic narratives. Therefore, the subject property does not appear to be eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion A/1/1.

Arthur Bothe was the original owner of the property and aside from living in the City and working in nearby Pasadena, Bothe does not appear historically significant. There is no information available to suggest that any of the previous owners or residents are historic personages who made demonstrably significant contributions to the history of the nation, state, or region, or that any other individuals of historical significance are associated with the property.

Therefore, the subject property is ineligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion B/2/2.

The subject property, a Spanish-Colonial Revival residence, was constructed in 1932. The architect, if any, of the project is unknown. Therefore, the subject property does not appear to be the work of a master architect. V.A. Williamson is listed as a contractor associated with the construction of the subject property. Based on newspaper research, Williamson operated throughout Southern California, particularly Pasadena, San Marino, and various surrounding communities.

There is no information specific to or associated with Williamson’s building projects. Williamson is not identified in historic issues of Southwest Builder and Contractor. The subject property is not featured in historic issues of Architectural Digest. Local newspapers articles indicate Williams was contracted by Arthur Bothe to construct the subject property. There is no additional information available to suggest that Williamson was a master builder or tradesman. Therefore, the subject property does not appear to be a significant example of the style that would merit a mention in architectural and construction trade publications. The subject property is a common, low-style example of a Spanish-Colonial Revival single-family residence. Based on the overall commonality of the subject property and modest styling, it is safe to assert that it does not rise above the level of workmanship of other properties of the same style within the City. The subject property is not the best representation of the period of significance; therefore, the subject property does not appear to be eligible for listing in the National Register under Criterion C/3/3.

Criterion D was not considered in this report as it generally applies to archaeological resources. Additionally, there is no reason to believe the property has the potential to yield important information regarding prehistory or history.

PAGE 115 of 341
State of California ⎯ Natural Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
DPR 523L (9/2013) *Required information

Page 7 of 10 ends

*B10. Significance: (Continuation from Continuation Sheet page 6) The California Register eligibility criteria mirror those of the National Register. Therefore, the subject property is eligible for listing in the California Register for the same reasons outlined above.

Similarly, the San Marino Historic Landmark eligibility criteria mirror those of the National Register and California Register criteria. Therefore, the subject property is eligible for designation as an Historic Landmark for the same reasons outlined above.

The subject property was evaluated as a potential contributor to the potentially eligible Mission Street Residential Historic District identified by ARG in the Citywide Survey. Yet, the subject property does not convey an association with a significant development pattern within the City during this time due to it being built after residential development boom of the 1920s. San Marino had seen heavy residential construction during the 1920s, averaging over 150 new buildings per year and reaching a height of 212 new buildings in 1927, valued (along with additions/alterations to existing buildings) at over $3 million. In contrast, its average between 1931 and 1934 was only 55 new buildings per year, with a low of only 44 new buildings and a valuation of $433,672 in 1934. The construction rate was about a third of what it was during the 1920s boom, while the valuation was about a seventh—this indicates that not only were fewer buildings built, but they were likely smaller and more modest than those that came before. It is clear that San Marino’s development slowed during the worst years of the Great Depression, just as development slowed across the nation, but it did not stop completely. The subject property is a common, low-style example of a Spanish-Colonial Revival-style of architecture, is not designed by a master architect, and not built for a prominent resident. According to the Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor, the subject property is one of six Spanish Colonial Revival residences on the same block. Neighboring properties were constructed between 1924 and 1927. The construction of the surrounding properties appears to be more closely associated with residential development in the City between 1913 and 1930. The subject property was added to the predominantly developed tract in 1932. In addition to being a latter addition, the subject property is not an excellent example of the style on the block. In addition to being the least noted property on the 500 block of Old Mill Road, additional properties were constructed in the 1950s and are examples of the ubiquitous Ranch-style homes found throughout the City. The potentially eligible district contains over 200 potentially eligible contributors. The 500 block alone contains four potentially eligible Spanish Colonial Revival-style contributors that are excellent examples of the style and are closely associated with residential development in the City. Contributors include 550 Old Mill Rd (3D,3CD, 5D3), 555 Old Mil Rd (3D,3CD,5D3), 575 Old Mill Rd (3D, 3CD, 5D3), 575 Old Mill Rd (3D, 3CD, 5D3), and 595 Old Mill Rd (3D, 3CD, 5D3).

Overall, the loss of this one modest Spanish-Colonial Residence that is not found to bare historic significance beyond being constructed in 1932 would not result in a negative impact to the potentially eligible Mission Street Residential District. To determine the significance and eligibility, the entire district would need to be evaluated. A complete evaluation of each property within the district is beyond the scope of this evaluation but is assumed to qualify for designation as a historic district for the purposes of this study. Therefore, the proposed project was reviewed against the Standards to determine if it would result in an indirect visual impact to the potential historic district.

Impact Analysis
The proposed project meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, No. 9.

Page 8 of 10 ends

*B10. Significance: (Continuation from Continuation Sheet page 7) The proposed new construction of a 2,695-square-foot residence would not result in a substantial adverse change to the potentially eligible Mission Street Residential Historic District. The proposed project was preliminarily reviewed by the City of San Marino. The proposed project does not aim to create a false sense of history by recreating building features found on neighboring buildings. The project will not obscure the visibility of neighboring buildings to the north and south. The newly constructed building will be erected below the allowable maximum building height requirements. Therefore, the project will not stick out above extant buildings on the north side of Old Mill Road and will not alter the linear massing of the block. The proposed project will include building materials that are complimentary and compatible to extant buildings within the Mission Street Historic Residential Historic District. Building materials and features include a low-pitched hip roof, second level dormers, painted brick façades, front porch columns, and cedar shake type cement roof tiles. Additionally, the subject property does not appear to be a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines. The proposed project would not result in a substantial adverse change to historical resources pursuant to Section 15064.5(b) of the CEQA Guidelines.

Based on the research and analysis, the subject property located at 535 Old Mill Road does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National Register, California Register, or for designation as an Historic Landmark. The building was constructed in 1932 but is not associated with significant development patterns within the City. The subject property is not designed by a master architect or constructed by a master builder and is a common and low-style example of the Spanish-Colonial Revival-style residence. Additionally, the subject property does not contribute to a potential historic district. The proposed project was evaluated against the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and complies with the Standards and would not result in a substantial adverse change to historical resources pursuant to Section 15064.5(b) of the CEQA Guidelines.
*B12. References: (Continued from Building, Structure, Object Report page 2) Ames, David L. and Linda Flint McClelland. 2002. National Register Bulletin: Historic Residential Suburbs: Guidelines for Evaluation and Documentation for the National Register of Historic Places,” 49. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service.

Ancestry. 2000. ”California, U.S., Death Index, 1940-1997 [database on-line].” Provo, UT:

Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.

Ancestry. 2010. “U.S., Public Records Index, 1950-1993, Volume 1 [database on-line].” Lehi, UT:

Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.

Ancestry. Year: 1927; "U.S., School Yearbooks, 1880-2012"; School Name: South Pasadena-San Marino High School.

Ancestry. Year: 1940; Census Place: San Gabriel, Los Angeles, California; Roll: m-t0627-00254; Page: 8B; Enumeration District: 19-703.

California Office of Historic Preservation. 1999. California State Law and Historic Preservation, 4853 (c), 66.

City of Los Angeles. 2016. “Context: Jewish History” in “SurveyLA Los Angeles Citywide Historic Context Statement,” 13. Prepared by: GPA Consulting, El Segundo, CA and Becky Nicolaides.

City of San Marino Tract Map 8687.

PAGE 117 of 341
State of California ⎯ Natural Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
DPR 523L (9/2013) *Required information

Page 9 of 10 ends

*B12. References: (Continued from Continuation Sheet page 8) City of San Marino. 11 April 2018. City Council Agenda. Accessed May 16, 2018. Available at:
http://www.ci.san-marino.ca.us/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_04112018-1034 City of San Marino. 2020. City of San Marino Historic Citywide Survey Map. City of San Marino.

Prepared by: Architectural Resources Group, Pasadena, CA. Available at:
https://www.cityofsanmarino.org/DocumentCenter/View/4570/San-Marino-Recon-Map-61319 City of San Marino. October 2020. “San Marino Citywide Historic Resources Survey Report.” Prepared by: Architectural Resources Group, Pasadena, CA. Available at https://www.cityofsanmarino.org/planning/Historic%20Survey/San%20Marino%20Historic%20Reso urces%20Survey%20Report%20FINAL%2010.6.20.pdf
City of San Marino. Updated 15 May 2020 (working document). “San Marino Historical Resources Survey ‐ Preliminary List of Properties to be Surveyed ‐ DISTRICTS.” Available at:
https://www.cityofsanmarino.org/planning/Historic%20Survey/San%20Marino%20Property%20List %20-%20Districts%20-%205.15.20.pdf
City San Marino. April 2020. San Marino Historic Context Statement Draft. Prepared by:

Architectural Resources Group, Pasadena, CA. Available Available at:
https://www.cityofsanmarino.org/DocumentCenter/View/4569/San-Marino-Historic-ContextStatement-Draft-4119 “County Vacancy Ratio Now Lowest Since 1924.” 23 February 1941. Los Angeles Times. “Development Plans Prepared for New San Marino Tract.” 22 January 1939. Los Angeles Times. “Development Plans Prepared.” 23 October 1938. Los Angeles Times.

Available at: http://salt.umd.edu/T-RACES/demo/demo.html “Homesites Bought; Residences to Rise.” 23 October 1938. Los Angeles Times.

Pasadena Independent. 19 October 1967.

The Billings Gazette. 17 June 1919. Interstate News Montana-Wyoming.

PAGE 118 of 341
State of California ⎯ Natural Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
DPR 523L (9/2013) *Required information

Page 10 of 10 ends

*B12. References: (Continued from Continuation Sheet page 9) The Santa Ana Daily Register. 22 December 1925.

PAGE 119 of 341
State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary #

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial #
NRHP Status Code 3S, 3CS, 5S3
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 5 ends

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information
*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Mission Street Residential Historic District P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Los Angeles and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Date T ;R ; ¼of ¼ of Sec ; B.M.
c. Address City San Marino Zip 91108
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ; mE/ mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) The Mission Street Residential Historic District is located in western San Marino. It comprises 382 houses in the irregular area bounded roughly by Winthrop Road to the south, Euclid Avenue and Los Robles Avenue to the west, South Oak Knoll Avenue to the east, and the northern city limit. The northeastern quadrant of the district abuts the Mission Street Commercial Planning District. Residences are one or two stories and set on large lots. The area is fairly flat or gently sloping. Streets are mostly straight, and improvements vary throughout the district. The neighborhood consists of single-family residences primarily designed in a mix of Period Revival styles with some compatible Minimal Traditional infill. 306 properties contribute to the district’s historic significance. Some properties have been altered, but overall, the district retains sufficient integrity to be eligible for listing in the National Register, California Register, and as a City of San Marino Historic District.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2. Single family property *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.):
*P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures or objects) P5b. Description of Photo: (view, date, accession #) Mission Street
Historic District, Fleur Drive,
view east (ARG 2020)
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: Historic
Prehistoric Both
1924-1955
(sources listed on Page 3)
*P7. Owner and Address:

Not Recorded
*P8. Recorded by: Name,
affiliation, and address)
Mary Ringhoff, Rosa Lisa Fry,
Architectural Resources Group,
360 E. 2nd Street, Suite 225
Los Angeles, CA 90012
*P9. Date Recorded:
2/19/20-
2/27/20
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
Intensive
Reconnaissance
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources or enter "none.") ARG, “City of San Marino Citywide Historic Resources Survey Report” (prepared for the City of San Marino, 2020) *Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure & Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photographic Record Other (List)
PAGE 120 of 341
State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary #

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

DISTRICT RECORD

Page 2 of 5 ends

DPR 523D (1/95) *Required Information
D1. Historic Name: D2. Common Name: Mission Street Residential Historic District *D3. Detailed Description (Discuss overall coherence of the district, its setting, visual characteristics, and minor features. List all elements of the district.):

The Mission Street Residential Historic District is a neighborhood of one and two-story single-family residences located on the far west side of San Marino. The neighborhood is mostly flat, though it is flanked on the east and west by channelized drainages of the Alhambra wash. The topography slopes downward towards these waterways, particularly in the northeastern and southwestern corners of the district. Streets are mostly straight, though there is no strict adherence to a grid. Improvements include concrete sidewalks and most streets feature ornamental cast stone streetlights with obscure glass lanterns. Houses retain generous setbacks with front lawns and scattered mature shade trees. Historic street trees are prevalent and can be found along many roadways throughout the district. Some streets retain consistent plantings of southern magnolia, jacaranda, or carrotwood trees. All properties have garages with driveways oriented on the side of the lot. Most garages are detached and sited at the rear of the parcels.

The Mission Street district consists of single-family residences primarily designed in a mix of Period Revival and Minimal Traditional styles.

Period Revival contributors include high style examples of Spanish Colonial Revival, Tudor Revival, American Colonial Revival, Monterey Revival, and Mediterranean Revival. The Spanish Colonial Revival style predominates throughout the neighborhood with particularly consistent stretches on Fleur Drive and eastern La Mirada Avenue. Typical architectural features include complex massing and asymmetrical façades, incorporation of corbeled jetties and balconettes, a low-pitched hipped roof with clay tile roofing, open woodbracketed eaves, stucco wall cladding, single and paired multi-paned windows (predominantly casement), and decorative chimney caps simulating turrets. Of the 382 total properties, 306 (80%) contribute to the district’s historic significance. 76 of this district’s properties do not contribute to its significance due to substantial alterations or construction dates after the period of significance. The district retains sufficient integrity to be eligible for listing in the National Register, California Register, and as a City of San Marino Historic District.

Of the 306 buildings that contribute to the district’s significance, 6 have also been identified as individually eligible for designation (880 Winthrop Road, 1740 Ramiro Road, 2585 Monterey Road, 2385 Monterey Road, 1720 Ramiro Road, 2787 Fleur Drive). *D4. Boundary Description (Describe limits of district and attach map showing boundary and district elements.):

The Mission Street Residential Historic District constitutes an irregularly shaped area in western San Marino. The district is bounded by Winthrop Road to the south, Euclid Avenue and Los Robles Avenue to the west, South Oak Knoll Avenue to the east, and the northern city limit.
*D5. Boundary Justification:

The boundaries of the Mission Street Residential Historic District were drawn to encompass a relatively intact area of residential development and related site features which retain sufficient integrity to convey their significance. The boundaries of the district roughly correspond to tracts subdivided in the mid-1920s, but have been modified to include only that portion of the neighborhood that retains enough integrity to convey its association with residential development from 1924-1955. Elements within the district boundaries are unified geographically and in terms of scale, style, use, and age. *D6. Significance: Theme Residential Development; Architecture and Design Area San Marino Period of Significance: 1924-1955 Applicable Criteria: A/1/1, C/3/3 (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) Summary Statement of Significance:

The Mission Street Residential Historic District is eligible for listing in the National Register, California Register, and as a City of San Marino Historic District under Criteria A/1/1 and C/3/3. The district conveys significant patterns of residential development in San Marino from the 1920s to the 1950s and embodies the distinctive characteristics of multiple architectural styles (predominantly Period Revival and Minimal Traditional).

Residential Development and Architecture:

The Mission Street Residential Historic District is significant as one of the earlier sections of San Marino to be subdivided and developed.

This westernmost corner of San Marino appears to be one of the few areas in the city not owned by railroad magnate Henry E. Huntington; instead the early ranchos were divided and sold to various developer groups. Before subdivision, orchards dominated the district and agricultural holdings in the area included Los Robles Rancho, the Pollard Ranch, and Richardson’s Lemon Grove.

Similar to much of the development surrounding the Huntington Estate, the Mission Street Residential Historic District was fully subdivided and aggressively marketed in the mid-1920s. This district comprises 10 small tracts, all of which were originally subdivided between 1923- (continued on page 3)
*D7. References (Give full citations including the names and addresses of any informants, where possible.): (See Page 3) *D8. Evaluator: Mary Ringhoff and Rosa Lisa Fry Date: 2/19-2/27, 2020 Affiliation and Address: Architectural Resources Group, 360 E. 2nd Street Suite 225, Los Angeles, CA 90012 PAGE 121 of 341
State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary #

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET

Page 3 of 5 ends

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information
*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Mission Street Residential Historic District Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: 2/19-2/27, 2020 Continuation Update *D6. Significance (continued from page 2):
1927 by different proprietors. The northwestern quadrant of the Mission Street Residential District was subdivided in 1924 and subsequently developed by the California Consolidated Building and Investment Corporation as Oak Knoll Grove. A Los Angeles Times article from November 16, 1924 announces the construction of 100 homes by the developer.1 The neighborhood is noted as highly restricted with high grade improvements including macadam streets, sidewalks, and wide street frontages.2 Additionally, the “balmy weather of Southern Italy” and proximity to the Huntington Hotel, Raymond Hotel, and California Institute of Technology are noted as selling points.

By 1926, many tracts in the eastern half of the district (9381, 9164, 9382, and 5529) were owned by the Evans-Lee Corporation and the area was marketed as the Old Mill Vista subdivision. A Los Angeles Times article from 1926 announced that the Evans-Lee Corporation and the Lincoln Mortgage Company planned to build homes in the area and lauded the desirable location near the Huntington Hotel and Old Mill. The article states, “In view of the historic background of the property, closely linked with the early mission days of Southern California, the development at Old Mill Vista will be carried out along Spanish lines.”3 Many of the houses in Old Mill Vista were built in the Spanish Colonial Revival style by the subdivision developers and custom homes had to be approved by the Evans-Lee Corporation’s jury of architects. Advertisements boast that “every lot has trees” and the area is “historic in its charms.”4 The southwestern quadrant of the district does not appear to have been marketed as a unified subdivision. As such it is presumed that that most homes were custom-built and not the work of owner-developers. The three tracts in this area (7500, 7828, 8349) were subdivided between 1923-1924 and many of the earliest houses in the district appear in this area west of Los Robles Avenue. Although this section of the district was subdivided by different developers, it also features many Spanish Colonial Revival designs and maintains architectural cohesiveness with Oak Knoll Grove and Old Mill Vista. Development throughout the district was relatively swift, beginning on the west side and moving east, with scattered infill in the 1940s and 1950s. Approximately two thirds of the residences in the district were built in the 1920s and a quarter in the 1930s. The neighborhood was largely complete by the late 1930s, with compatible construction and infill continuing until the mid-1950s.

The Mission Street Residential Historic District contains a significant concentration of Period Revival and Minimal Traditional architecture, with high quality of design and craftsmanship conveyed by individual dwellings. District contributors retain the original plans, massing, and character-defining features of their respective styles. The district appears eligible for listing as a City of San Marino Historic District as an embodiment of significant patterns of residential development from the mid-1920s to the mid-1950s. It also appears eligible as a cohesive collection of intact Period Revival residential architecture, particularly the Spanish Colonial Revival style. The district retains sufficient integrity to convey its association with historic patterns of residential development, and to convey its original architectural character.

Evaluation of Significance:

The Mission Street Residential Historic District is eligible for federal, state, and local designation under Criteria A/1/1 for its association with significant patterns of events: specifically, residential development in San Marino from the 1920s to the 1950s. The district is also eligible for designation under Criteria C/3/3 for its association with the distinctive architectural character of the Period Revival (particularly Spanish Colonial Revival) and Minimal Traditional. The period of significance for the Mission Street Residential Historic District is 1924 to 1955, reflecting its major period of development and the time during which most of its buildings were constructed.

Evaluation of Integrity:

The Mission Street Residential Historic District contains a significant concentration of Period Revival and Minimal Traditional architecture, with high quality of design and craftsmanship conveyed by individual dwellings. Minimal Traditional and Period Revival styles were used concurrently throughout the period of significance. District contributors retain the original plans, massing, and character-defining features of their respective styles. As a result, the district appears eligible for listing in the National Register, California Register, and as a City of San Marino Historic District as an embodiment of significant patterns of residential development from the mid-1920s to the mid-1950s. It also appears eligible as a cohesive collection of intact Period Revival and Minimal Traditional residential architecture. The district retains sufficient integrity to convey its association with historic patterns of residential development, and to convey its original architectural character.
*
D7. References (continued from page 2):
“$1,000,000 To Be Spent,” Los Angeles Times, November 16, 1924.

Architectural Resources Group, Inc. City of San Marino Citywide Historical Resources Survey Report. Prepared for the City of San Marino, 2020. (continued on page 4)
1 “Oak Knoll Grove Put on Market,” Los Angeles Times, November 16, 1924. 2 “$1,000,000 To Be Spent,” Los Angeles Times, November 16, 1924. 3 “New Tract Built Up,” Los Angeles Times, June 26, 1926. 4 “Location is Everything,” Los Angeles Times, June 5, 1926. PAGE 122 of 341 State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary #

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

CONTINUATION SHEET

Page 4 of 5 ends

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information
*D7. References (continued from page 2):

City of Los Angeles. SurveyLA Los Angeles Citywide Historic Context Statement, Context: Architecture and Engineering, 1850-1980.

Themes prepared by multiple consultants for the City of Los Angeles Office of Historic Resources, 2018-2020.

City of San Marino. Building permits, various dates.

GPA Consulting, Inc. Residential Period Revival Architecture and Development in Pasadena from 1915-1942. Prepared for the City of Pasadena, 2004.
“Location is Everything,” Los Angeles Times, June 5, 1926.

Los Angeles County Department of Public Works. Tract Maps. Accessed 2020 at https://dpw.lacounty.gov/smpm/landrecords/TractMaps.aspx.

Los Angeles County Office of the Assessor. Parcel Data. Accessed 2020 at http://maps.assessor.lacounty.gov/.

Los Angeles Times, various dates.

McAlester, Virginia Savage. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2015. “New Tract Built Up,” Los Angeles Times, June 26, 1926. “Oak Knoll Grove Put on Market,” Los Angeles Times, November 16, 1924. *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Mission Street Residential Historic District Recorded By: Architectural Resources Group Date: 2/19-2/27, 2020 Continuation Update PAGE 123 of 341
State of California--- The Resources Agency Primary #

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI

LOCATION MAP

Page 5 of 5 ends

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information
*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Mission Street Residential Historic District *Map Name: Mission Street Residential HD Location Map *Scale: See scale bar *Date of Map: 2/27/2020 PAGE 124 of 341
535 Old Mill Rd

10.11.25 Protected Tree Report
SUBMITTED TO:

Patrick Szurpicki
Studio Build California
206 Winchester Avenue
Alhambra, CA 91801
PREPARED BY:

Cris Falco
(619) 313-3939
1318 E Walnut Creek Pkwy
West Covina, CA 91790
Board Certified Master Arborist WE-7490B
Registered Consulting Arborist #557
Pest Control Adviser #128017
Qualified Tree Risk Assessor

OCTOBER 11, 2025
PAGE 125 of 341
Table of Contents
Background and Assignment .......................................................................................... 1

Project Description.......................................................................................................... 2 Tree Map ........................................................................................................................ 3 Tree Data ........................................................................................................................ 4 Recommendations and Construction Impact Guidelines.................................................. 5 Photos............................................................................................................................. 8 Assumptions & Limiting Conditions............................................................................. 20 Tree Map PDF is separately attached
PAGE 126 of 341
1 BACKGROUND AND ASSIGNMENT
In December of 2024, I was contracted by Studio Build California to prepare a Protected Tree Report for a single-family residential property located at 535 Old Mill Rd, San Marino, CA 91108. The property owner intends to make improvements to the property. I visited the site on December 20, 2024, collected the required tree data, and submitted a tree report and tree map on December 23, 2024.

In October of 2025, Studio Build California updated the site plan and asked that the tree report and tree map be updated accordingly. This is the updated report. The accompanying tree map PDF is separately attached.

A formal risk assessment1 was not included within the scope of this assignment, and I do not guarantee the safety, health, or condition of any tree on the subject property, or in the vicinity of the subject property. My expertise in this matter is limited to arboriculture, and this report is not intended to be legal advice. This report is intended to be used by Studio Build California and the property owner to assist in obtaining the necessary permits to perform the desired construction. 1 For more information on tree risk assessment, visit https://www.isa-arbor.com/Credentials/ISA-Tree-RiskAssessment-Qualification PAGE 127 of 341
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project is proposing to demolish the existing house and build a new house in roughly the same place. The existing two-car garage in the northeast corner of the property will also be removed, and a new one will be built. I inventoried 12 trees for this report:
− Of the 12 trees, 2 are in the parkway, 4 are on other properties, and 6 are on-site. − Of the 12 trees, there are no “Oak Trees,” 3 “Established Trees,” and 9 “Heritage Trees,” 2 of which are street trees.
− There are 2 trees to be removed:
o Trees 4 and 5 (Callery pear and Citrus in the backyard) are proposed for removal because they are in the construction footprint of the new garage. − Please see the landscape plan submitted by the project architect for mitigation tree planting.

To calculate stem diameters on multi-trunk trees, I used the formula below (quadratic combined diameter) because it more accurately represents the actual trunk area of multi-trunk trees.

1. Measure the diameter of each stem.

2. Find the square of each value of diameter.

3. Add the squares.

4. Find the square root of the sum.

PAGE 128 of 341
3 TREE MAP
PAGE 129 of 341
4 TREE DATA
Tree # Tag # Location Common Name Scientific Name Trunk Diameters
Total DSH*
(inches)
Height
(feet)
Oak
Tree
Established
Tree
Heritage
Tree Removal Notes
1 942 On-site Mexica Fan Palm Washingtonia robusta 20
(estimated) 20 50(brown trunk) No No Yes No Covered in Ficus pumila 2 None Other property Victorian Box Pittosporum undulatum 18 (estimated) 18 30 No Yes No No None
3 None Other property California Sycamore Platanus racemosa 22 (estimated) 22 60 No No Yes No None
4 943 On-site Callery Pear Pyrus calleryana 1, 3, 5 6 20 No Yes No Yes In footprint of new garage 5 944 On-site Citrus Citrus sp. 8 8 16 No No Yes Yes In footprint of new garage 6 None Other property Edible Fig Ficus carica 4, 6
(estimated) 7 22 No Yes No No None
7 None Other property Pink Trumpet Tree Handroanthus heptaphyllus 5, 12 (estimated) 13 35 No No Yes No None
8 945 On-site Jacaranda Jacaranda mimosifolia 25 25 40 No No Yes No None 9 946 On-site Chinese Elm Ulmus parvifolia 16
(estimated) 16 30 No No Yes No Might be a boundary tree 10 947 On-site Chinese Elm Ulmus parvifolia 16
(estimated) 16 30 No No Yes No Might be a boundary tree 11 None Parkway Crape Myrtle Lagerstroemia indica 9 9 18 No No Yes No Street Tree 12 None Parkway Crape Myrtle Lagerstroemia indica 9 9 18 No No Yes No Street Tree * To calculate Total DSH on multi-trunk trees, I used the quadratic combined diameter formula because it more accurately represents the actual trunk area of multi-trunk trees.

PAGE 130 of 341
5 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION IMPACT GUIDELINES
Pre-Construction
These recommendations should be implemented prior to the start of construction:
- Erect tree protection fencing per the Tree Map:
o No construction activity, heavy equipment access, or material storage should occur within the tree protection fencing during construction without the direct supervision and approval of a qualified arborist. o Tree protection zone fencing should be a temporary chain-link fence of at least 5-ft. height, and fencing should be supported by steel stakes driven directly into the ground. Fencing should have no easy entry. If a gate is required in the fence in the backyard, the gate should have a sign signifying tree protection.
- Pruning
o If pruning is desired, make sure that all required permits are obtained prior to work.
o Only prune when deemed necessary by the project arborist; as much live foliage as possible should be preserved through the construction process to give the trees the best opportunity to thrive after construction is complete. o Hire a crew directly supervised by a Certified Arborist on-site to ensure the pruning cuts are made to branch unions and do not remove an excessive amount of foliage.
o Pruning cuts should leave the minimum cross-sectional area of exposed woundwood after each final finish cut is made.
o Remove dead branches from the trees as they appear. Retain living branches unless they conflict with the infrastructure or are diseased or defective.
- Supplemental Irrigation
o Consider supplemental irrigation for all subject trees to be retained. o If soil conditions are found to be dry, apply a deep-soak irrigation to the soil within the dripline of the trees once per month from March through October. The goal of the irrigation is to moisten the soil to a depth of 12 inches while minimizing runoff.

PAGE 131 of 341
6 During Construction
This is the stage where mechanical injury is the most likely to occur. By following these recommendations, the likelihood of accidental damage will be reduced:
- General Recommendations
o Inform all construction personnel of the intention to preserve the trees.

Many times damage occurs because workers are not aware of the importance of preserving the trees on site. This includes contractors and their respective subcontractors as well.
o If any changes are made to the plans resulting in any excavation or equipment access within the dripline of a protected tree, the project arborist should be informed. Additional protection measures may need to be discussed.
o No construction activity should occur within the tree protection fencing without first consulting an arborist. This includes construction worker access, materials storage, materials disposal, and equipment access. No construction materials should cross the tree protection fencing, be leaned against any protected tree, or affixed to their trunks. o If any injury should occur to a tree during construction, the project arborist should be informed promptly so that the tree may be evaluated and treated as soon as possible.
- Construction Phase
o If during any part of the construction phase there is a significant amount of particulates in the air (from cutting materials or any other activity), a shop vacuum or equivalent should be used during the cutting or other activity to reduce the amount of particulates that are deposited on the foliage. If despite a good faith effort to reduce particulates, a layer is still deposited on the foliage, wash it off with a jet of water at the end of each construction day where particulates are deposited.
o During the painting phase, if spray-application of paint is used within proximity of a protected tree, cover the windward side of the trunk and scaffold branches of the tree with plastic at the beginning of each painting day to avoid paint drifting onto the tree. Remove the plastic at the end of each day to allow for air circulation.

PAGE 132 of 341
7 - Clean-Up and Landscaping Phase
o Retain the tree protection fencing until construction activity has been completed or until the landscape installation phase begins. Even when landscapers are permitted near the trees, make sure they are aware of the intention to preserve the trees and the roots if any digging is performed for irrigation lines or plant installation.
o All irrigation line trenches within the dripline of any protected tree should be hand-dug. If significant roots measuring one inch in diameter or larger are encountered, the project arborist should be consulted. If practical, tunnel underneath the roots to preserve them.

Post-Construction Care
The most stressful time of year for the subject trees will be the summer immediately following construction. The following management practices are recommended:
- Retain the leaf drop around the root zone of the subject trees where practical. The best ground cover for a tree is its own leaf mulch. Leaf mulch will continue to reduce soil evaporation and mitigate soil temperature changes. If leaf drop is not practical for use, apply a layer of coarse mulch 2-4 inches thick around the bases of the trees.
- The subject trees can be monitored annually by a qualified arborist for the development of disease, decay, or other symptoms of stress due to construction activity. Deadwood may be removed as it appears, and as much live wood as possible should be retained on the trees, provided that it doesn’t come into conflict with the infrastructure.
- If the soil is dry, continue applying deep-soak irrigation within the dripline of all subject trees from March through October until canopy density is adequate, as determined by a qualified arborist.

PAGE 133 of 341
8 PHOTOS
Tree 1
PAGE 134 of 341
9 Tree 2
PAGE 135 of 341
10 Tree 3
PAGE 136 of 341
11 Tree 4
PAGE 137 of 341
12 Tree 5
PAGE 138 of 341
13 Tree 6
PAGE 139 of 341
14 Tree 7
PAGE 140 of 341
15 Tree 8
PAGE 141 of 341
16 Tree 9
PAGE 142 of 341
17 Tree 10
PAGE 143 of 341
18 Tree 11
PAGE 144 of 341
19 Tree 12
PAGE 145 of 341
20 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS

1. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible; however, the Consultant can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. Standard of Care has been met with regards to this project within reasonable and normal conditions.

2. The Consultant will not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual agreements are made, including payment of an additional fee for such services as described in the fee schedule and contract of engagement.

3. Loss or alteration of any part of this report invalidates the entire report.

4. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed, without the prior written consent of the Consultant.

5. This report and any values expressed herein represent the opinion of the Consultant, and the Consultant’s fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a stipulated result, a specified value, the occurrence of a subsequent event, nor upon any finding to be reported.

6. Unless expressed otherwise: 1) information contained in this report covers only those items that were examined and reflects the condition of those items at the time of inspection; and 2) the inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without dissection, excavation, or coring, unless otherwise stated. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of the tree(s) or property in question may not arise in the future.

7. Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. It is highly recommended that you follow the arborist recommendations; however, you may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations and/or seek additional advice.

8. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specific period of time.

PAGE 146 of 341
21 9. Any recommendation and/or performed treatments (including, but not limited to, pruning or removal) of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the arborist’s services, such as property boundaries, property ownership, site lines, disputes between neighbors, and any other related issues. Arborists cannot take such considerations into account unless complete and accurate information is disclosed to the arborist. An arborist can then be expected to consider and reasonably rely on the completeness and accuracy of the information provided.

10. The author has no personal interest or bias with respect to the subject matter of this report or the parties involved. He/she has inspected the subject tree(s) and to the best of their knowledge and belief, all statements and information presented in the report are true and correct.

11. Unless otherwise stated, trees were examined using the risk assessment criteria detailed by the International Society of Arboriculture’s publications Best Management Practices – Tree Risk Assessment and the Tree Risk Assessment Manual (Second Edition).

PAGE 147 of 341
PAGE 148 of 341
This application is an appeal of the Planning Commission’s January 28, 2026 denial of project number DR 22-26. Specifically, the Planning Commission denied the project on the stated grounds Design Review Findings 1 and 2 could not to be made because of the “scale and massing” of the proposed residence. However, they agreed that the applicant’s architect made all of the changes they requested at the first hearing on October 22, 2025.

Further, two of the public speakers stated how much more they liked it. The second of which even stated it would be a great addition to the neighborhood when questioned by the Commission. As such, the Commission ignored substantial evidence in support of both findings simply because they wanted the square footage of the house reduced. No other changes were discussed.

Specifically, as to Finding 1 “That the proposed structure is compatible with the neighborhood”, the staff report provided information and an analysis that the proposed project complied with this finding. The project architect also provided revisions to the proposed project, ensuring compatibility with the adjacent properties and neighborhood.

There was a reduction on the proposed building height, additional design elements to the Spanish Colonial revival design, were added to the proposed structure, and a proposed variance was removed from the proposal. The proposed front yard setback of the house is 35’ which is the requirement for the subject property. The proposed project complied with the SMMC, Zoning Code, and the San Marino Design Guidelines to ensure no issues with the scale and massing. The proposed FAR is compatible with existing residences. There’s a total of 6 two story residential houses on the Old Mill Road neighborhood. The majority of the houses on the neighborhood are Mission/Spanish style houses.

As to Finding 2 “That the proposed structure is designed and will be developed in a manner which balances the reasonable expectation of privacy of persons residing on contiguous properties with the reasonable expectations of the applicants to develop their property within the restrictions of this code”, the staff report provided information and an analysis that the proposed project complied with this finding. Revisions were made to address the privacy concerns from the October 22, 2025, Planning Commission meeting.

Privacy glazing is proposed on the windows, two proposed windows on the East elevation have been removed, the windows in bedroom #3 have been made a smaller size to comply with the minimum standards from the California Residential Building Code. The windows from bedroom #3 are located adjacent to the existing and proposed driveway at 535 Old Mill Road. The windows in bedroom #3 will only have a partial view of the adjacent driveway PAGE 149 of 341
and the roof of the 545 Old Mill Road property. The existing Cypress tree/hedges provide screening. There are no privacy issues with bedroom #3.

Bedroom #4 has a 16’ setback from the East elevation property line and none of the windows align with the 545 Old Mill Road second story structure. The 545 Old Mill Road property has a driveway that’s about 12’ wide. There is a total building separation of almost 28’ between the proposed bedroom #4 and the 545 Old Mill Road second floor. Only three windows are proposed on the West elevation. One is a bathroom window, and two windows are located in a loft/workspace area. All three windows will have privacy glazing. The rear yard setback is greater than 50’. There are mature trees on the West elevation and rear North elevation. There are no privacy issues.

The staff report properly concluded that all the required findings were met and provided with the recommendation of approval for the 535 Old Mill Road project, which the Commission also ignored without explanation.

PAGE 150 of 341
Picture of the 535 Old Mill Rd property, East elevation looking towards the 545 Old Mill Rd property. Picture taken from the existing driveway, front area of the house.

Picture of the 535 Old Mill Rd property, East elevation looking towards the 545 Old Mill Rd property. Picture taken from the existing driveway, middle area of the house.

PAGE 151 of 341
Picture of the 535 Old Mill Rd property, East elevation looking towards the 545 Old Mill Rd property. Picture taken from the existing driveway gate area of the house.

Picture of the 535 Old Mill Rd property, rear yard, looking at the front elevation of the existing garage. Picture taken from the existing driveway gate area of the house.

PAGE 152 of 341
Picture of the 535 Old Mill Rd property, East elevation looking towards the 545 Old Mill Rd property. Picture taken from the existing driveway/garage area of the house.

Picture of the 535 Old Mill Rd property, East garage elevation looking towards the 545 Old Mill Rd property.

Picture taken from the existing driveway/garage area of the house.

PAGE 153 of 341
Picture of the 535 Old Mill Rd property, rear yard looking East, towards the 545 Old Mill Rd property. Picture taken from the existing driveway, rear garage area.

Picture of the 535 Old Mill Rd property, rear yard looking East, towards the 545 Old Mill Rd property. Picture taken from the existing driveway, rear garage area.

PAGE 154 of 341
87 Columbia St. Pasadena, CA 91105 1
Date: 06.01.2026
Attn: Jose Villegas
Project Name: 535 Old Mill Road
Project Location: 535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, CA 91108 Ref. Plan # and submittal date: City Council Appeal Presentation June 4th 2026 Narrative of Landscape Tree and Plant Selections for 535 Old Mill Road Dear San Marino City Council,
I have reviewed the proposed landscape plan for the residence at 535 Old Mill Road and evaluated the plant selections with respect to privacy screening, neighborhood compatibility, and long-term landscape performance. The proposed residence has been designed in a Spanish Mission architectural style that is consistent with the historic character of Old Mill Road and reflects the architectural heritage of the nearby Old Mill landmark and surrounding residences. The landscape plan has been developed to complement this architectural character while providing effective longterm screening and preserving the established landscape character of the neighborhood.

The residence is set behind a significant existing Jacaranda tree that serves as the defining landscape feature of the front yard. Its mature canopy, graceful branching structure, and seasonal floral display soften views of the residence from the public street. In addition, two existing Crape Myrtle street trees located within the parkway are in good condition and will continue to provide a filtered foreground canopy that further reduces the visual prominence of the new two-story home.

The western property line benefits from an established canopy of mature trees ranging from approximately 25 to 35 feet in height, including Chinese Elms within the front yard and Pink Trumpet Trees and a large California Sycamore toward the rear of the property. Together, these trees provide a substantial upper canopy layer between neighboring properties to the north and west. To complement this canopy, the proposed front landscape introduces a Fruitless Olive (Olea europaea 'Swan Hill') and a Western Redbud (Cercis occidentalis) to frame the existing Jacaranda and create a secondary layer of vegetation beneath the Elms. The Fruitless Olive will be installed as a 24- inch box specimen, approximately 5 to 6 feet tall and 3 to 4 feet wide at installation, and is expected to mature to approximately 20 feet tall and 10 to 12 feet wide, fitting comfortably beneath the Elm canopy while contributing mid-story screening. The Western Redbud, a native flowering understory tree, will provide seasonal interest while reinforcing the Southern California character of the landscape palette.

Moving north into the rear yard, the west property line is framed by an established canopy of Pink Trumpet Tree, evergreen Pittosporums, California Sycamore, and edible Fig trees, creating a continuous overhead canopy along much of the property line. Beneath this canopy, the proposed Fuji Apple and Eureka Lemon trees will occupy the intermediate height layer between the existing wall and overstory trees. Installed as 15-gallon specimens approximately 6 to 8 feet tall, these fruit trees are expected to mature to 12 to 15 feet in height, providing seasonal interest, edible fruit, and additional screening between neighboring properties.

In response to comments received during the public review process regarding privacy screening, an additional canopy tree has been incorporated into the landscape plan to address the gap between the existing Sycamore and Fig trees along the west property line. The proposed Chinese Flame Tree (Koelreuteria bipinnata) was selected for its upright form and mature canopy size, allowing it to PAGE 155 of 341
87 Columbia St. Pasadena, CA 91105 2
occupy the vertical space between the existing trees while remaining compatible with the scale of the site. At maturity, this species is anticipated to reach approximately 25 to 35 feet in height and 20 to 30 feet in width, blending naturally with the surrounding tree canopy and further strengthening the layered screening condition along the west property line.

The north property line already benefits from substantial screening provided by mature trees located immediately beyond the property boundary. To enhance this condition, a Ray Hartman California Lilac (Ceanothus'Ray Hartman') and Purple Smoke Tree (Cotinus coggygria) are proposed along the north wall. Installed at approximately 4 feet and 3 feet tall, respectively, these plants are expected to mature to approximately 12 to 15 feet in height, extending above the existing wall while contributing additional screening, seasonal color, and landscape diversity. Their modest installation sizes are appropriate from a horticultural perspective, allowing successful establishment and healthy long-term growth.

Along the east property line, the existing Cypress hedge will be preserved and protected throughout construction activities. This mature hedge currently provides an effective privacy buffer between neighboring residences. Should any portion of the hedge be damaged during construction, replacement plantings should be installed in kind to maintain the continuity and screening function of this landscape feature.

The design retains lawn areas in both the front and rear yards, preserving the traditional residential character of the property while providing usable outdoor space for family activities. The front lawn complements the mature Jacaranda, while the rear lawn provides recreation space framed by flowering and fruiting trees.

Overall, the proposed landscape design creates a layered screening strategy composed of existing mature canopy trees, new mid-story trees, evergreen shrubs, and preserved hedging. The selected plant palette consists primarily of drought-tolerant Mediterranean and California-adapted species that are well suited to the San Gabriel Valley climate and consistent with the established landscape character of San Marino.

Based on my professional review as a licensed Landscape Architect, the proposed landscape plan will provide effective long-term layered screening along the west, north, and east property lines while remaining compatible with the architectural character of the residence, the surrounding neighborhood, and the historic landscape context of Old Mill Road. The proposed planting design preserves existing mature landscape assets, incorporates enhancements in response to public comments, and will continue to strengthen privacy and neighborhood character as the landscape matures over time.

Sincerely,
Sally Reynolds, Founding Principal SR-LA
Landscape Architect
California Certificate No. 6473
Renewal Date: 01.31.27
PAGE 156 of 341
June 3, 2026
Honorable Mayor, Mr. Tony Chou and Honorable Council Members, At the January 28, 2026, Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission denied project DR 22-26, a proposal to demolish an existing 1,751 sq. ft. single-family residence and associated buildings to construct a 2,690 sq. ft. two-story residence with a detached 552 sq. ft. 2 vehicle garage. The Planning Commission stated per SMMC Sec. 23.15.09: STANDARD OF REVIEW, Finding 1 and Finding 2 could not be made.

However, the Planning Commission ignored the evidence and facts, demonstrating the proposal was complying and addressing the SMMC Sec. 23.15.09: STANDARD OF REVIEW, Finding 1 and Finding 2. A staff report also supported the approval of the proposal and the findings were made by staff to recommend approval of the proposed project.

SMMC. Section:23.15.09: STANDARD OF REVIEW:

The DRC or Planning Commission shall consider the durability, quality and cost of construction materials when raised as an issue by the applicant. The DRC or Planning Commission shall consider all applications for design review and may deny, with or without conditions, or approve any case in general accord with the following principles and standards as determined by the DRC or Planning Commission based on findings and conclusions drawn from information and evidence presented at a public hearing:

A. The DRC shall approve the application if it finds all of the following to be true:

1. That the proposed structure is compatible with the neighborhood, and

2. That the proposed structure is designed and will be developed in a manner which balances the reasonable expectation of privacy of persons residing on contiguous properties with the reasonable expectations of the applicants to develop their property within the restrictions of this code,
The proposed project complies with Finding 1. As it is compatible with the neighborhood per the reasons listed below:

The proposed project removed the requested Variance to reduce the front yard setback. The Variance would have allowed the house to be placed closer to the street. Given the comments from the first Planning Commission hearing, regarding scale and massing, the Variance was removed to setback the house further away from the street and front property line. The removal of the request for the Variance improved the compatibility with the neighborhood.

The existing Heritage tree, Jacaranda (Jacuranda Mimosifolia) will remain in the front of the property. It has an existing height of 40’ with a tree trunk diameter of 25”. The existing Jacaranda tree will soften the visual appearance of the front elevation of the proposed project and continue with the strong tree scape of the street and adjacent properties. Keeping the Jacaranda tree improves the compatibility with the neighborhood.

PAGE 157 of 341
The proposal is a Spanish Colonial Revival design structure, which is replacing an existing Spanish Colonial Revival. This neighborhood of Old Mill Road has 6 Spanish Colonial Revival structures.

The proposal and design are compatible with the neighborhood.

The proposal is a new two-story Spanish Colonial Revival. The neighborhood has 6 existing two-story single-family residential structures. 5 of those structures are Spanish Colonial Revivals.

The house located to the east elevation (545 Old Mill Road) is an existing two-story single family residential structure. The proposed two-story Spanish Colonial Revival is compatible with the neighborhood given the amount of existing two-story single-family residential structures and existing two-story Spanish Colonial Revivals.

The Legal Neighborhood consists of 11 properties. 7 properties are located on Old Mill Road. And 4 properties are located on South Los Robles Avenue. There are 8 Spanish Colonial Revival residential structures within the Legal Neighborhood. 3 of the 8 Spanish Colonial Revival properties are located on South Los Robles Avenue. There are 8 two-story residential structures within the Legal Neighborhood. 4 of the 8 two-story residential structures are located on South Los Robles Avenue. The proposal is compatible with the Legal Neighborhood as 8 of the residential structures are Spanish Colonial Revival and 8 of the residential structures are two-story structures.

During the January 28th Planning Commission meeting, Commissioner Boyle stated "I believe that this house is still too large. I think that it is incompatible with the neighborhood due to its size. I think that this very small lot size with this very large house is something that is not seen in the Mission District and is specifically not seen on the street.” Unfortunately, this state was not true.

The proposed Spanish Colonial Revival is 2,690 sq. ft. which is 36.2% FAR. The average FAR of the neighborhood is 34%. 550 Old Mill Road has 35% FAR and 560 Old Mill Road has 39% FAR.

The property owner of 550 Old Mill Road mentioned their square footage of 3,130 sq. ft. was incorrect. However, the Los Angeles County Assessor’s Office has it listed at 3,130 sq. ft. As of now, we need to use the information provided by the Los Angeles County Assessor's Office.

Regarding the proposed FAR, the proposal is compatible with the neighborhood.

The San Marino Mission District has existing houses and properties with a variety of Lot Sizes and FARs similar to the proposed 535 Old Mill Road project with a proposed FAR of 2,690 sq. ft. on an existing Lot Size of 7,436 sq. ft.

South El Molino Avenue has 3 properties/houses with the FAR greater than 30%. One property/house has the FAR greater than 35%. Please review below. 1665 S EL MOLINO AVE 31% FAR
2703 DORESTA RD 39% FAR (corner house of S El Molino Avenue and Doresta Road) 2710 ARDMORE RD 33% FAR (corner house of S El Molino Avenue and Ardmore Road) PAGE 158 of 341
South Los Robles Avenue has 13 properties/houses with the FAR greater than 30%. With 7 properties/houses with the FAR greater than 35%. Please review below. 1601 S LOS ROBLES AVE 45% FAR
1625 S LOS ROBLES AVE 35% FAR
1679 S LOS ROBLES AVE 37% FAR
1691 S LOS ROBLES AVE 36% FAR
1705 S LOS ROBLES AVE 42% FAR
1690 S LOS ROBLES AVE 35% FAR
1710 S LOS ROBLES AVE 38% FAR
There are 7 properties located North of Mission Street and South of the San Marino City boundary on South Los Robles Avenue with 35% FAR or greater. These properties are located within the Mission District and near the subject property that is compatible with the proposed project at 535 Old Mill Road, regarding FAR and design. 6 of those properties are Spanish Colonial Revival single-family residential structures.

The proposed project complies with all SMMC, Zoning Codes, San Marino Design Guidelines, and the most recent California Residential Building Codes. The project is compatible with the neighborhood, Legal Neighborhood, and the San Marino Mission District. Finding 1 can be made with all the supporting information listed above.

The proposed project complies with Finding 2. The project was designed to minimize privacy impacts on all the adjacent neighbors. The proposed project also addresses the current lack of privacy with the east elevation neighbor at 545 Old Mill Road. There is no privacy fence between the two properties.

A new block wall was proposed with the project, between the 535 Old Mill Road property and the 545 Old Mill Road property. However, during the first Planning Commission hearing the property owner of 545 Old Mill Road expressed concerns with the natural air flow and ventilation. The project was revised with a new 6’ height iron fence. There is currently no permanent fence or wall between the two properties. There’s only vegetation and trees that provides minimal privacy. The 6’ height iron fence will allow the existing vegetation and trees to grow as footings will be used. The existing Cypress hedges will be preserved. The iron fence with the footing will also allow the 545 Old Mill Road property owner to plant their own trees on their property, increasing the privacy. The new iron fence will provide privacy between the two properties. Please review the attached pictures of the existing conditions. There is no privacy. The proposed project will create privacy.

The proposed new single-family residential structure has a new side yard setback of 10’6” on the east elevation. The existing side yard setback is 8’1”. The proposed new single-family residential structure will be 1’6” away from the current east elevation property line. This will increase privacy between the two properties.

The proposed east elevation was revised and two windows were removed. The windows on bedroom number 3, located on the east elevation, second floor, were reduced in size to the minimum allowed per the California Residential Building Code. The windows in bedroom number 3 will be facing the two driveways and potentially look at the roof area of 545 Old Mill Road. The PAGE 159 of 341
existing windows on the first floor at 545 Old Mill Road (west elevation) have two canopies, protecting their privacy. The existing Cypress hedges will remain and be replaced if needed. The privacy of the adjacent 545 Old Mill Road property is provided.

Bedroom number 4 on the second floor has three windows on the east elevation and will be located about 16’3” away from the property line. The property 545 Old Mill Road has an existing driveway that is about 8’ to 9’ wide. The estimated distance of the windows in bedroom number 4 to the adjacent single-family residential structure will be about 24’ to 25’.

The west elevation second floor has windows in the loft area, which is open area and near the staircase. There are two-bathroom windows, on the second floor, west elevation. The windows have privacy glass. The west elevation first floor has two-bathroom windows with privacy glass.

One window in each of the bathrooms. There are 4 required windows in bedroom number 2. Two windows on the west elevation and 2 windows on the north elevation. The existing side yard setback on the west elevation is 3’10” and the proposed side yard setback is 5’. The estimated building setback from the proposed project to the east elevation of 505 Old Mill Road will be greater than 40’. A new stucco on both sides, CMU block wall, will be built to increase privacy.

The rear north elevation has bedroom number 2 on the first floor and has two windows located on the north elevation and that will have a 50’9” setback from the rear property line. There are no privacy issues with those windows. The second floor has bedroom number 4 with two windows facing the north elevation, rear property line. The proposed setback will be greater than 50’9”.

There are no privacy issues.

The rear patio area will be about 18” from the grade. There might be minimum visibility with the adjacent property at 545 Old Mill Road. There is currently no privacy between these two properties as there is no fence or wall between them. The proposed iron fence will increase and improve privacy.

The existing garage is located on or near the east elevation property line. The new garage will have a new 5’ setback and an iron fence, providing privacy. There is currently no privacy in the rear yard or side setback between 535 Old Mill Road and 545 Old Mill Road. The proposed design and project will address the privacy issue.

The proposed landscape plan also addresses any privacy issues. The proposed trees are anticipated to reach a mature height of approximately 12’ to 15’ ft. and will provide an appropriate transition between the 6’ stucco CMU wall along the west property line and the existing mature trees on neighboring properties, which currently provide canopy heights in the range of 20’ to 30’ ft.

As the proposed plants mature, it will contribute to a denser and more effective visual buffer for adjacent properties. Please review the letter drafted by the Landscape Architect, explaining how the proposed landscape plan will provide and address privacy.

The proposed project complies with all SMMC, Zoning Codes, San Marino Design Guidelines, and the most recent California Residential Building Codes. The project was created, trying to preserve or increase the privacy between the adjacent neighbors. Finding 2 can be made with all the supporting information listed above.

PAGE 160 of 341
1 RESOLUTION NO. R-26-21

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW NO. DR 22-26, TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING 1,751 SQUARE-FOOT RESIDENCE AND ASSOCIATED
STRUCTURES AND CONSTRUCT A NEW 2,690 SQUARE-FOOT RESIDENCE WITH A 552 SQUARE-FOOT DETACHED TWO-CAR GARAGE; LOCATED AT 535 OLD MILL ROAD, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 5325-005-025, CITY OF

SAN MARINO
WHEREAS, on May 25, 2022, an application to demolish an existing 1,751 square-foot (sq ft) single-family residence and associated buildings and construct a 2,690 sq ft twostory residence with a detached 552 sq ft 2-car garage with a variance to allow the residence to encroach 2-feet 4-inches within the front yard setback has been duly filed by (or on behalf of) Patty Chan (Property Owner), for the property located at 535 Old Mill Road, San Marino, CA, 91108 (the Property),
WHEREAS, the Property is Zoned R-1 Single-Family Residential (Area District VII) and WHEREAS, the Property in question is legally described as follows:

LOT ON NE LINE OF OLD MILL RD COM NW THEREON 10.07 FT FROM SE COR OF LOT 57 TR # 8687 TH N 21¢ E 142.40 FT TH N 61¢ 52'35" W 50 FT TH SW TO SD NE LINE TH SE THEREON 50 FT TO BEG PART OF LOT 18 SUB OF A PORTION OF THE LOS ROBLES RANCHO AS PER BK 42 PG 83 OF M R AND PART OF LOT 57 TRACT # 8687 , IN THE CITY OF SAN MARINO, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

WHEREAS, a public hearing to consider said application was set and held before the Planning Commission on October 22, 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., and relevant testimony, evidence, and comments have been made a part of the record.

WHEREAS, on October 22, 2025, the Planning Commission also reviewed all of the information provided in the staff report and considered the testimony given at the public hearing, including all written communications to the Planning Commission, as well as other pertinent information; and
WHEREAS, on October 22, 2025, the Planning Commission deliberated the merits of the Project and made a Motion of Intent to Continue the Project to a date uncertain; and WHEREAS, a public hearing to consider said application was set and held before the Planning Commission on January 28, 2026, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., and relevant testimony, evidence, and comments have been made a part of the record.

WHEREAS, on January 28, 2026, the Planning Commission also reviewed all of the information provided in the staff report and considered the testimony given at the public PAGE 161 of 341
2 hearing, including all written communications to the Planning Commission, as well as other pertinent information; and
WHEREAS, on January 28, 2026, pursuant to the findings, the Planning Commission denied DESIGN REVIEW NO. DR 22-25; and
WHEREAS, on February 25, 2026, the Planning Commission adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. PCR 26-17 denying Design Review No. 22-25; and WHEREAS, on February 26, 2026, an application to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission was duly filed by Patty Chan; and
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2026, a public hearing to consider said appeal was set and held before the City Council of the City of San Marino, and relevant testimony, evidence, and comments have been made a part of the record; and
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2026, during said public hearing, the City Council of the City of San Marino reviewed all of the information provided in the staff reports and considered the testimony given, including all written communications to the Planning Commission, as well as other pertinent information; and
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2026, during said public hearing, the City Council of the City of San Marino deliberated the merits of the project, and denied the decision of the Planning Commission to deny Planning Commission Resolution No. PCR 25-17; and WHEREAS, on June 10, 2026, during said public hearing, the City Council of the City of San Marino deliberated the merits of the project, and adopted Resolution No. R 26-21; and WHEREAS, the proposed project is Categorically Exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 3.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARINO does hereby find, determine and declare:

SECTION 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as part of this decision by this reference.

SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of San Marino makes the following findings for an application to demolish an existing 1,751 sq ft single-family residence and associated buildings and construct a 2,690 sq ft two-story residence with a detached 552 sq ft 2-car garage for DESIGN REVIEW NO. DR 22-26:

1. That the proposed structure is compatible with the neighborhood, a. The project encompasses the construction of a new 2,690 sq ft two-story Spanish style single-family residence with a detached 529 sq ft 2-car garage.

PAGE 162 of 341
3 The proposed Spanish Colonial Revival home is compatible with the legal neighborhood and with the existing property. The legal neighborhood is comprised of homes that display Spanish Colonial Revival and Mediterranean Revival architecturally styled homes.

The height of the proposed residence is 21 feet-5 inches. The proposed structure is compatible with the height of the adjacent neighbor’s home at 545 Old Mill Road, which has a height of 21 feet – 8 inches and with other residences in the legal neighborhood such as 550 Old Mill Road, at 25 feet in height.

The proposed massing of the residence is compatible with the surrounding residences located within the neighborhood. Compatible residences within the legal neighborhood include 560 Old Mill Road with a livable area of 2,951 sq ft, and 550 Old Mill Road with a livable area of 3,130 sq ft.

As such, this project meets this finding.

2. That the proposed structure is designed and will be developed in a manner which balances the reasonable expectation of privacy of persons residing on contiguous properties with the reasonable expectations of the applicants to develop their Property within the restrictions of this Code, a. The two-story design of the home is consistent with the majority of the residences found in the legal neighborhood that are designed as twostory residences.

The proposed side setback to the east neighboring property is 10 feet-6 inches, which is greater than the existing setback of 8 feet-11 inches.

The proposed side setback to the west neighboring property is 5 feet-6 inches, which is greater than the existing setback of 3 feet-10 inches.

The property features existing 16-foot-tall cypress hedges and a proposed 6-foot-tall CMU block wall with stucco that wraps around the entire perimeter of the property from the front of the house to the rear property line. There are existing hedges and as the property abuts the rear yard of 505 Old Mill Road, the side yard impact is decreased. There is significant landscaping and no structure directly behind the rear property line of 535 Old Mill Road. Therefore, the visibility and privacy of either adjacent or rear neighbor would be minimally impacted, and there would be a reasonable expectation of privacy.

The proposal is developed in a manner that balances the reasonable expectation of privacy of persons residing on contiguous properties with the reasonable expectations of the applicants to develop their property within the restrictions of this code.

PAGE 163 of 341
4 Therefore, this project meets this finding.

3. In the case of a building addition, the proposal is compatible with the existing building which includes the rooflines,
a. The project proposes to demolish the existing single-family residence and construct a new single-family residence. Consequently, this finding is not applicable to this project.

As such, this project meets this finding.

4. That the colors and materials are consistent and match the existing building or structure.
a. The project proposes to demolish an existing single-family residence and construct a new single-family residence. Consequently, this finding is not applicable to this project.

Therefore, this project meets this finding.

SECTION 3. PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, IT IS RESOLVED that City Council of the City of San Marino hereby approves DESIGN REVIEW NO. DR 22-26 and subject to conditions of approval.

SECTION 4. The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15303 (Class 3) and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies.

PAGE 164 of 341
5 CERTIFICATION
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on this 10th day of June, 2026.

CALVIN LO, VICE MAYOR
ATTEST:

ALISON WALKER

CITY CLERK

EXHIBITS
A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.

CITY OF SAN MARINO )
I, ALISON WALKER, City Clerk of the City of San Marino, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. R-26-21 was adopted by the City Council of the City of San Marino at a Regular Meeting held on the 10th day of June, 2026, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________

ALISON WALKER

CITY CLERK
PAGE 165 of 341
6 EXHIBIT A

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT #: Design Review No. DR 22-26
SUBJECT: Demolish an existing 1,751 sf residence and construct a 2,690 sf two-story residence with a detached 552 sf 2-car garage.

APPLICANT: Patty Chan
LOCATION: 535 Old Mill Road
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.

APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (626) 300-0718, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:

A. General Requirements Completion Date

1. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed council members, boards, commissions, officers, officials, agents, consultants, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all claims, actions, or proceeding against the City and its elected and appointed council members, boards, commissions, officers, officials, agents, consultants, employees and volunteers to attack, set aside, void or annul, an approval of the City, Planning Commission or City Council concerning this permit and the project. Such indemnification shall include damages, judgments, settlements, penalties, fines, defensive costs or expenses, including, but not limited to, interest, attorneys’ fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind related to or arising from such claim, action, or proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit City from participating in a defense of any claim, action or proceeding. The City shall have the option of coordinating the defense, including, but not limited to, choosing counsel for the defense at applicant’s expense.
___/___/__

2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. ___/___/__
PAGE 166 of 341
7 B. Time Limits

1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within one year from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
___/___/__
C. Site Development

1. Prior to any use of the project site being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.

2. The applicant will consult with City Staff to confirm an appropriate landscape plan to maintain the health of the existing oak trees to the rear of the Property.

3. Occupancy of the structures shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to commencement of occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the San Marino Fire Department and the Building Department to show compliance. The structure shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to start of occupancy.

D. Conditions of Approval

1. Prior to any use of the project site being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.

2. The homeowner and homeowner’s representative can decide their preference for the board and batten siding on the gable at the front façade of the residence
___/___/___
___/___/___
___/___/___
___/___/___
___/___/___
PAGE 167 of 341
1 RESOLUTION NO. R-26-21

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARINO, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.

PCR 25-17, WHICH DENIED DESIGN REVIEW NO. DR 22-26, TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING 1,751 SQUARE-FOOT RESIDENCE AND ASSOCIATED
STRUCTURES AND CONSTRUCT A NEW 2,690 SQUARE-FOOT RESIDENCE WITH A 552 SQUARE-FOOT DETACHED TWO-CAR GARAGE; LOCATED AT 535 OLD MILL ROAD, ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 5325-005-025, CITY OF

WHEREAS, on January 28, 2026, the Planning Commission also reviewed all of the information provided in the staff report and considered the testimony given at the public PAGE 168 of 341
2 hearing, including all written communications to the Planning Commission, as well as other pertinent information; and
WHEREAS, on January 28, 2026, pursuant to the findings, the Planning Commission denied DESIGN REVIEW NO. DR 22-25; and
WHEREAS, on February 25, 2026, the Planning Commission adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. PCR 26-17 denying Design Review No. 22-25; and WHEREAS, on February 26, 2026, an application to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission was duly filed by Patty Chan; and
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2026, a public hearing to consider said appeal was set and held before the City Council of the City of San Marino, and relevant testimony, evidence, and comments have been made a part of the record; and
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2026, during said public hearing, the City Council of the City of San Marino reviewed all of the information provided in the staff reports and considered the testimony given, including all written communications to the Planning Commission, as well as other pertinent information; and
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2026, during said public hearing, the City Council of the City of San Marino deliberated the merits of the project, and upheld the decision of the Planning Commission to deny Planning Commission Resolution No. PCR 25-17; and WHEREAS, on June 10, 2026, during said public hearing, the City Council of the City of San Marino deliberated the merits of the project, and approved Resolution No. R 26-21; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project is Categorically Exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 3.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARINO does hereby find, determine and declare:

SECTION 1. All of the above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein as part of this decision by this reference.

1. That the proposed structure is compatible with the neighborhood, PAGE 169 of 341
3 The project encompasses the construction of a new 2,690-square-foot two-story Spanish style single-family residence with a detached 552- square-foottwo-car garage.

The proposed massing of the residence is incompatible with the surrounding residences located within the neighborhood. The proposed residence is on a 7,218-square-foot lot and the proposed livable area is 2,690-square-feet, which is 37 percent of the property and significantly larger than the average of 29 percent in the legal neighborhood.

As such, this project does not meet this finding.

2. That the proposed structure is designed and will be developed in a manner which balances the reasonable expectation of privacy of persons residing on contiguous properties with the reasonable expectations of the applicants to develop their Property within the restrictions of this Code, The windows on the proposed east elevation create a direct line of sight into the neighbor’s property at 545 Old Mill Road without any mitigating factors.

The proposal project, therefore, does not properly balance the reasonable expectation of privacy of persons residing on contiguous properties with the reasonable expectations of the applicants to develop their property within the restrictions of this code.

As such, this project does not meet this finding.

3. In the case of a building addition, the proposal is compatible with the existing building which includes the rooflines,
The project proposes to demolish the existing single-family residence and construct a new single-family residence. Consequently, this finding is not applicable to this project.

As such, this project meets this finding.

4. That the colors and materials are consistent and match the existing building or structure.

The project proposes to demolish an existing single-family residence and construct a new single-family residence. Consequently, this finding is not applicable to this project.

Therefore, this project meets this finding.

SECTION 3. PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, IT IS RESOLVED that City Council of the City of San Marino hereby denies DESIGN REVIEW NO. DR 22-26.

PAGE 170 of 341
4 SECTION 4. The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15303 (Class 3) and there is no substantial evidence demonstrating that an exception to a categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15300.2 applies.

CERTIFICATION
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on this 10th day of June, 2026.

CALVIN LO, VICE MAYOR
ATTEST:

ALISON WALKER

CITY CLERK

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________

ALISON WALKER

CITY CLERK
PAGE 171 of 341
535 OLD MILL RD
NEW 2-STORY FAMILY HOME
PAGE 172 of 341
PAGE 173 of 341
PAGE 174 of 341
PAGE 175 of 341
2 nd floor ceiling
height 8’-2”
1st floor ceiling
height 8’-4”
PAGE 176 of 341
Proposed front facade
Existing front facade
35’ CITY YARD SETBACK
PAGE 177 of 341
site
PAGE 178 of 341
Added additional privacy tree
in response to 1/28 PC mtg
Proposed Chinese elm tree
PAGE 179 of 341
PAGE 180 of 341
535 Old mill – thank you for your consideration
PAGE 181 of 341
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Alison Walker, City Clerk
DATE: June 10, 2026
SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS

PERTAINING TO THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO
BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2026

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Engaged and Connected Residents
Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND
A General Municipal Election will be held on November 3, 2026, for the purpose of electing three members to the City Council for full terms. The three (3) members of the City Council whose terms are expiring are Tony Chou, Calvin Lo, and Gretchen Shepherd Romey. Prior to the holding of an election, the City must adopt three resolutions in relation thereto. The first resolution calls and gives notice of holding an election. The second resolution requests the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors to allow consolidation with the statewide election being held on the same day and to direct the County Elections Department to render services; and the third resolution adopts regulations for the candidates’ statements.

DISCUSSION
Significant dates for the General Municipal Election are as follows:
• July 13, 2026 – Filing period opens for nomination papers • August 7, 2026 – Last day to file nomination papers
Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 182 of 341
• August 8, 2026 through 5PM on August 12, 2026 – Nomination extension period if an incumbent does not file by 5PM on August 7, 2026.
• August 13, 2026 - Secretary of State to determine Order of Names on Ballot
• October 19, 2026 – Last day to register to vote for this election • November 3, 2026 – Election Day
Resolution No. R-26-15 “Calling and Giving Notice” is to call the City’s General Municipal Election to elect three City Council members. The resolution includes language that would allow - but not require - the City to submit a ballot measure or measures to the voters at the same election. This language is in consideration of the City’s expiring Utility Users Tax. A filing fee of twenty-five dollars ($25) shall be paid by the candidate upon the filing of nomination papers.

Resolution No. R-26-16 requests the Board of Supervisors to consolidate the City’s election with other elections on the same date the County will conduct and to permit the County Elections Department to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the election. The services to be provided by the County Registrar of Voters include, but are not limited to, the appointment of all required election officers and establishment of polling places; publishing the notice of appointment of election officers, preparing and mailing the official and sample ballots including candidates’ statements, process vote by mail ballots; supply all needed materials for polling places; conduct the election, canvass the election returns and certify the results; and in the event of a tie vote between two or more persons receiving an equal and the highest number of votes for the offices to be voted for, to determine the tie by lot. The City would reimburse the County for the costs of providing the services.

Resolution No. R-26-17 adopts regulations for candidates pertaining to candidates’ statements submitted to the voters. The regulations limit the candidate’s statement to 200 words describing the candidate’s education and qualifications expressed by the candidate. The statement shall not include party affiliation nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations.

The candidates will be required to pay a deposit of $300 at the time of filing his/her nomination paper in order to have the statement included in the voters’ pamphlet. The candidate will be billed for any cost in excess of the deposit and will receive a refund of any unused portion of the deposit.

Additionally, in light of the City’s Utility Users Tax expiration in March 2027, now is the appropriate time to provide direction to staff to return with information, necessary documents, and ballot language for the Council’s PAGE 183 of 341
consideration to place the renewal of the City’s longstanding Utility Users Tax on the November 3, 2026 General Election ballot.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
The County has provided an estimate of the cost for this election which is approximately $60,000. The funds have been included in the 2026-27 Fiscal Year Budget.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt: (1) Resolution No. R-26-15 calling and giving notice of the holding of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, for the election of certain officers as required by the provisions of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law Cities and requesting the Registrar of Voters of the County of Los Angeles to conduct said election; (2) Resolution No. R-26-16 requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles to render services to the City relating to the conduct of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026; (3) Resolution No. R-26-17 adopting regulations for candidates for elective office pertaining to candidates’ statements submitted to the voters at an election to be held on November 3, 2026; and (4) direct staff to return to a future City Council meeting with the necessary documents and ballot language to consider placing the City’s expiring Utility Users Tax on the November 3, 2026 ballot. If the Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to (1) adopt Resolution No. R-26-15, calling and giving notice of the holding of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026; (2) Resolution No. R-26-16, requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles to render services to the City relating to the conduct of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026; (3) Resolution No. R-26-17, adopting regulations for candidates for elective office pertaining to candidates’ statements submitted to the voters at the election to be held on November 3, 2026; and (4) direct staff to return to a future City Council meeting with the necessary documents and ballot language to consider placing the City’s expiring Utility Users Tax on the November 3, 2026 ballot.”
PAGE 184 of 341

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. R-26-15, a Resolution Calling and Giving Notice of the Holding of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026

2. Resolution No. R-26-16, a Resolution Requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles to Render Services to the City Relating to the Conduct of a General Municipal Election

3. Resolution No. R-26-17, a Resolution Adopting Regulations for Candidates for Elective Office
PAGE 185 of 341
RESOLUTION NO. R-26-15

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SAN MARINO, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING

NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL

ELECTION TO BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMBER 3, 2026, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN

OFFICERS OF THE CITY AS REQUIRED BY THE

PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES AND

REQUESTING THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS OF THE

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TO CONDUCT SAID ELECTION

AND CANVASS THE RESULTS
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to General Law Cities in the State of California, a General Municipal Election shall be held every two years on specified dates, for the purpose of electing three (3) members of the City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARINO, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law Cities within the State, there is called and ordered held in the City of San Marino, California, on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, a General Municipal Election of the qualified electors of the City for the purpose of electing three (3) members of the City Council for full terms of four years each.

SECTION 2. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 10002 of the Elections Code of the State of California, this City Council hereby requests the Registrar of Voters of the County of Los Angeles to conduct the General Municipal Election for the City of San Marino.

SECTION 3. That the ballots to be used at the Election shall be, in form and content, such as may be required by law to be used in the Election.

SECTION 4. That the City Clerk is hereby authorized, instructed and directed to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies, equipment and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the Election.

SECTION 5. That the polls for the Election shall be open at seven o’clock a.m. on the day of the Election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o’clock p.m. of the same day when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 14401 of the Elections Code of the State of California.

SECTION 6. That a filing fee of twenty-five dollars ($25) shall be paid by each candidate upon the filing of his or her nomination papers.

SECTION 7. That in all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the Election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections in a general law City.

PAGE 186 of 341
CITY OF SAN MARINO RESOLUTION NO. R-26-15
PAGE 2 OF 3
SECTION 8. That notice of the time and place of holding the Election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give such further or additional notice of the Election, in time, form and manner as required by law.

SECTION 9. That the City Council of San Marino requests that the Los Angeles County Registrar of Voters canvass the results of the said Election.

SECTION 10. That the City of San Marino shall reimburse the County of Los Angeles Registrar of Voters for the cost of services performed relative to the conduct of the General Municipal Election, after completion of all work and upon presentation to the City of a properly detailed bill.

SECTION 11. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to forward a certified copy of this Resolution to said Los Angeles County Registrar of Voters.

SECTION 12. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions of the City of San Marino.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of San Marino, California, on this 10th day of June, 2026. _____________________________

CALVIN LO, VICE MAYOR

CITY OF SAN MARINO
ATTEST:
__________________________________

ALISON WALKER, CITY CLERK

CITY OF SAN MARINO
PAGE 187 of 341
CITY OF SAN MARINO RESOLUTION NO. R-26-15
PAGE 3 OF 3

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.

CITY OF SAN MARINO )
I, Alison Walker, City Clerk of the City of San Marino, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. R-26-15 was adopted by the City Council of the City of San Marino at a Regular Meeting held on the 10th day of June, 2026, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________________

ALISON WALKER, CITY CLERK

CITY OF SAN MARINO
PAGE 188 of 341

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
PAGE 189 of 341
RESOLUTION NO. R-26-16

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SAN MARINO, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF LOS

ANGELES TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2026, WITH

THE STATEWIDE AND LOCAL AND MUNICIPAL

CONSOLIDATED ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE DATE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 10403 OF THE ELECTIONS
CODE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Marino has called a General Municipal Election to be held on November 3, 2026, for the purpose of electing three (3) Members of the City Council to four-year terms of office; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal Election be consolidated with the Statewide and Local and Municipal Consolidated Election to be held on the same date, and that within the City the precincts, polling places and election officers of the two elections be the same, and that the County Elections Department of the County of Los Angeles canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election, and that the election be held in all respects as if there were only one election.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARINO DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That pursuant to the requirements of Section 10403 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles is hereby requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of a General Municipal Election with the Statewide and Local and Municipal Consolidated Election to be conducted by the County on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, for the purpose of electing three (3) Members of the San Marino City Council to four-year terms of office.

SECTION 2. That the County Elections Department is authorized to canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election. The Election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election, and only one form of ballot shall be used.

SECTION 3. That the Board of Supervisors is requested to issue instructions to the County Elections Department to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election.

SECTION 4. That the City of San Marino recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for all costs upon conclusion of the work and presentation to the City of an invoice for the reasonable costs of conducting the election.

SECTION 5. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this PAGE 190 of 341
CITY OF SAN MARINO RESOLUTION NO. R-26-16
PAGE 2 OF 2
resolution with the Board of Supervisors and the County Elections Department of the County of Los Angeles forthwith.

SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of San Marino, California, on this 10th day of June 2026. _____________________________
ATTEST:
__________________________________

ALISON WALKER, CITY CLERK

CITY OF SAN MARINO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.

CITY OF SAN MARINO )
I, Alison Walker, City Clerk of the City of San Marino, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. R-26-16 was adopted by the City Council of the City of San Marino at a Regular Meeting held on the 10th day of June, 2026, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________________

ALISON WALKER, CITY CLERK

CITY OF SAN MARINO

CALVIN LO, VICE MAYOR

CITY OF SAN MARINO
PAGE 191 of 341
RESOLUTION NO. R-26-17

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SAN MARINO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING

REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE
OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES’ STATEMENTS

SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN ELECTION TO BE
HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2026
WHEREAS, §13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California, provides that the governing body of any local agency may adopt regulations pertaining to materials prepared by any candidate for a municipal election, including costs of the candidate’s statement.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARINO,

CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. That pursuant to §13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at an Election to be held in the City of San Marino on November 3, 2026, may prepare a candidate’s statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk. The statement may include the name, age and occupation of the candidate and a brief description of no more than 200 words of the candidate’s education and qualifications expressed by the candidate. The statement shall not include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations. The statement shall be filed, in typewritten form, in the Office of the City Clerk at the time the candidate’s nomination papers are filed. The statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period of filing nomination papers and until 5:00 p.m. of the next working day after the close of the nomination period.

SECTION 2. In compliance with California law, the City Clerk shall provide a Spanish translation of the candidate’s statement at the candidate’s request. The City Clerk shall require each candidate filing a statement to pay a deposit of THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($300) for English, and SIX HUNDRED DOLLARS ($600) for English and Spanish, in advance as a condition of having his or her statement included in the voters’ pamphlet. The City Clerk shall bill each candidate for any cost in excess of the deposit and shall refund any unused portion of any deposit.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the candidate’s representative a copy of this Resolution at the time nomination petitions are issued.

SECTION 4. FOREIGN LANGUAGE POLICY.

A. Multilingual translations of candidate statements for voter information booklets may be provided in Chinese, Hindi, Japanese, Khmer, Korean, Spanish, Tagalog/Filipino, Thai and Vietnamese for qualifying jurisdictions in accordance with the National Voting Rights Act PAGE 192 of 341
CITY OF SAN MARINO RESOLUTION NO. R-26-17
PAGE 2 OF 3
provisions and Department of Justice specifications.

B. The County will print sample ballots and candidates’ statements in English and all qualified languages that equal 3% or more of voting-age residents in San Marino. The County will make the sample ballots and candidates’ statements in the required languages available at all polling places, on the County’s website, in the office of the City Clerk for the City of San Marino, and to voters requesting such material.

SECTION 5. PAYMENT.

A. Translations.

1. The candidate shall be required to pay for the pro rata cost of translating the candidate’s statement into any required foreign language as specified in (A) and/or (B) of Section 2 above, pursuant to Federal and/or State law.

2. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of translating the candidate’s statement into any foreign language that is not required as specified in (A) and/or (B) of Section 2 above, pursuant to Federal and/or State law, but is requested as an option by the candidate.

B. Printing.

1. The candidate shall be required to pay for the pro rata cost of printing the candidate’s statement in English in the main voter’s pamphlet.

2. The candidate shall be required to pay for the pro rata cost of printing the candidate’s statement in a foreign language required in (A) of Section 2 above, in the main voters’ pamphlet.

3. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of printing the candidate’s statement in a foreign language requested by the candidate per (B) of Section 2 above, in the main voters’ pamphlet.

The County Registrar of Voters shall estimate the total cost of printing, handling, translating, and mailing the candidate’s statements filed pursuant to this section, including costs incurred as a result of complying with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (as amended), and require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance to the local agency his or her statement included in the voters’ pamphlet. In the event the estimated payment is required, the estimate is just an approximation of the actual cost that varies from one election to another and may be significantly more or less than the estimate, depending on the actual number of candidates filing statements.

Accordingly, the City is not bound by the estimate specified above and may, on a pro rata basis, bill the candidate for additional actual expenses or refund any excess paid depending on the final actual cost. In the event of underpayment, the clerk shall require the candidate to pay the balance of the cost incurred. In the event of overpayment, the clerk shall prorate the excess amount among the candidates and refund the excess amount paid within 30 days of the election.

PAGE 193 of 341
CITY OF SAN MARINO RESOLUTION NO. R-26-17
PAGE 3 OF 3
SECTION 6. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS. No candidate will be permitted to include additional materials in the sample ballot package.

SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the candidate’s representative a copy of this resolution at the time nominating petitions are issued.

SECTION 8. That all previous resolutions establishing Council policy on payment for candidates’ statements are repealed.

SECTION 9. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of San Marino, California, on this 10th day of June, 2026. _____________________________

CALVIN LO, VICE MAYOR

CITY OF SAN MARINO
ATTEST:
__________________________________

ALISON WALKER, CITY CLERK

CITY OF SAN MARINO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.

CITY OF SAN MARINO )
I, Alison Walker, City Clerk of the City of San Marino, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. R-26-17 was adopted by the City Council of the City of San Marino at a Regular Meeting held on the 10th day of June, 2026, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________________

ALISON WALKER, CITY CLERK

CITY OF SAN MARINO
PAGE 194 of 341

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Alison Walker, City Clerk
DATE: June 10, 2026
SUBJECT: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. R-26-07 ADOPTING

PROCEDURES REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54953.4 (SB 707) PERTAINING TO

DISRUPTION OF TELEPHONIC OR INTERNET SERVICE

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
Engaged and Connected Residents

BACKGROUND
The Ralph M. Brown Act requires that, with limited exceptions, all meetings of a legislative body of a local agency be open and public and that all persons be permitted to attend and participate. In 2025, the Legislature adopted Senate Bill 707 (Durazo), which amends the Brown Act and establishes additional teleconference and public access requirements for city councils and county boards of supervisors. The bill becomes operative on July 1, 2026, and remains in effect until January 1, 2030.

Beginning July 1, 2026, the San Marino City Council will be required to:
• Provide members of the public with the option to attend meetings through a two-way telephonic service or a two-way audiovisual platform; • Continue to provide live webcasting of meetings; and
• Translate meeting agendas into any language spoken by at least 20 percent of the City’s population.

Importantly, the City of San Marino already complies with all of the requirements listed above.

Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 195 of 341
The City of San Marino will utilize Zoom Webinar to provide public access to meetings. This platform allows remote participants to view and listen to the meeting and to provide public comment when allowed by the City Clerk. For both non-agenda public comments and comments on specific agenda items, in-person speakers will be called first, followed by remote participants.

Remote participants will be audio-only and will not have the ability to enable video or share their screens. SB 707 also requires that, on or before July 1, 2026, the City Council adopt a policy addressing disruptions to telephonic or internet service occurring during meetings. The policy must establish procedures for recessing and reconvening a meeting in the event of a service disruption and outline the good-faith efforts the City will make to restore service. Resolution No. R-26-07 will adopt the procedures required by Government Code Section 54953.4 (SB 707) pertaining to disruption of telephonic or internet service.

If telephonic or internet service fails and the public is unable to participate as a result, the meeting must be recessed while the City makes a good-faith effort to restore service. The City Council may not reconvene the open session of the meeting until at least one hour after the disruption or until service is restored, whichever occurs first. The City Council may meet in closed session during this period. If service has not been restored after one hour, the meeting may resume if the City Council adopts a finding by roll-call vote that goodfaith efforts to restore telephonic or internet service have been made.

DISCUSSION
Adoption of the City Council Resolution No. R-26-07 Adopting Procedures Required by Government Code Section 54953.4 (SB 707) Pertaining to Disruption of Telephonic or Internet Service during public meetings ensures compliance with Senate Bill 707 and supports the City’s commitment to transparency and public access. The policy establishes clear procedures for handling unexpected telephonic or internet service disruptions, minimizing confusion during meetings and helping to preserve the public’s right to participate. Staff will also monitor implementation and update procedures as needed to ensure continued compliance with state law and best practices through the duration of Senate Bill 707.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
No additional funding is necessary at this time. The City already budgets for utilization of Zoom Webinar and translation services for agendas. Staff will monitor the need for additional translation services that are generated as a result of this legislation.

PAGE 196 of 341

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Council adopt Resolution No. R-26-07 Adopting Procedures Required by Government Code Section 54953.4 (SB 707) Pertaining to Disruption of Telephonic or Internet Service. If the Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to adopt Resolution No. R-26-07 Adopting Procedures Required by Government Code Section 54953.4 (SB 707) Pertaining to Disruption of Telephonic or Internet Service.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. R-26-07
PAGE 197 of 341

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
PAGE 198 of 341
4923-3640-0540 v1
RESOLUTION NO. R-26-07

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN

MARINO ADOPTING PROCEDURES REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54953.4 (SB 707) PERTAINING TO DISRUPTION OF

TELEPHONIC OR INTERNET SERVICE
WHEREAS, beginning July 1, 2026, eligible legislative bodies must provide members of the public an opportunity to attend open and public meetings through a two-way telephonic service or a two-way audiovisual platform, subject to the exceptions stated in that section; and WHEREAS, Government Code section 54953.4, subdivision (b)(1)(A)(i)(I)(ib), requires an eligible legislative body, on or before July 1, 2026, to approve at a noticed public meeting in open session a policy addressing disruption of telephonic or internet service occurring during meetings where remote access is required; and
WHEREAS, Government Code section 54953.4, subdivision (b)(1)(A)(i)(I)(ib)–(Ic), establishes requirements for recessing and reconvening a meeting and for making good faith efforts to restore service if a disruption prevents members of the public from attending or observing the meeting remotely; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is the City’s only “eligible legislative body” for purposes of Government Code section 54953.4; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt a policy that implements the requirements of Government Code section 54953.4.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Marino, California, as follows:

SECTION 1. The recitals above are true and correct and incorporated into the body of this Resolution by reference.

SECTION 2. The City Council adopts the Disruption of Telephonic or Internet Service Policy attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”
SECTION 3. This resolution implements Government Code section 54953.4. It does not create rights beyond those required by state law and does not expand the obligations imposed by that section.

SECTION 4. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, at a meeting of the City Council of the City of San Marino, California, on this 10th day of June, 2026.

PAGE 199 of 341
CITY OF SAN MARINO RESOLUTION NO. R-26-07

Page 2 of 3 ends

4923-3640-0540 v1

CALVIN LO, VICE MAYOR

CITY OF SAN MARINO
ATTEST:

ALISON WALKER, CITY CLERK

CITY OF SAN MARINO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.

CITY OF SAN MARINO )
I, Alison Walker, City Clerk of the City of San Marino, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. R-26-07 was adopted by the City Council of the City of San Marino at a regular meeting held on the 10th day of June, 2026, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________________

ALISON WALKER

CITY CLERK
PAGE 200 of 341
CITY OF SAN MARINO RESOLUTION NO. R-26-07

Page 3 of 3 ends

4923-3640-0540 v1
EXHIBIT “A”

DISRUPTION OF TELEPHONIC OR INTERNET SERVICE POLICY
A. This policy implements Government Code section 54953.4, subdivision (b)(1)(A)(i)(I)(Ib)–(Ic), for meetings of the City Council.

B. All open and public City Council meetings must include an opportunity for members of the public to attend via a two-way telephonic service or a two-way audiovisual platform, unless adequate telephonic or internet service is not operational at the meeting location. If adequate telephonic or internet service is operational at the City Council meeting location during only a portion of the meeting, the legislative body must include an opportunity for members of the public to attend via a two-way telephonic service or a two-way audiovisual platform during that portion of the meeting.

C. If telephonic or internet service is disrupted during a meeting so that the public cannot attend or observe through the two-way telephonic service or two-way audiovisual platform, the City Council recesses open session for up to one hour and makes a good faith effort to restore the service. During the recess, the City Council may meet in closed session as permitted by Government Code section 54953.4.

D. The City Council may not reconvene the open session until at least one hour has passed since the disruption, or until telephonic or internet service is restored, whichever occurs first.

E. If telephonic or internet service has not been restored when open session reconvenes, the City Council must adopt, by rollcall vote, a finding that it made good faith efforts to restore the service and that the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the public interest in remote public access.

PAGE 201 of 341

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Amber Shah, Parks & Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: June 10, 2026
SUBJECT: APPROVE A PUBLIC WORKS AGREEMENT WITH TRI-TECH RESTORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $808,953.79 FOR

WINDSTORM-RELATED ROOF REPAIRS TO CITY

FACILITIES AND AUTHORIZE THE PARKS, AUTHORIZE

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY, AND AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC

WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER TO APPROVE

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS NECESSARY FOR THE

COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, SUBJECT TO

CONCURRENCE BY THE CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS

INSURANCE AUTHORITY (CJPIA), WITH ALL

ASSOCIATED COSTS FUNDED BY CJPIA

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government
Inviting and Relevant City Facilities
Safe Community
Well-Maintained Infrastructure

BACKGROUND
On January 7, 2025, a severe windstorm impacted the City, resulting in widespread damage to both public and private properties. The storm caused significant debris and downed numerous trees throughout the community, including several that damaged City-owned facilities.

Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 202 of 341
Among the affected City properties were two structures within Lacy Park - a small office building for Parks & Public Works Department staff and maintenance garage housing equipment and tools. Both buildings sustained roof damage from fallen trees. Additionally, the City Hall roof was damaged by high winds and requires substantial repair.

On October 31, 2025, the City Council approved a Public Works Agreement with S&T Contractors Services, Inc. for roof repairs associated with windstorm damage in the amount of $264,976.20. Prior to executing the agreement or commencing any work, S&T Contractors Services, Inc. notified the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) that it was withdrawing from the project. As a result, the previously approved work could not proceed and CJPIA initiated a new contractor selection process.

Investigation and materials testing during the initial damage assessment identified asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint in portions of the project at the Lacy Park facilities requiring abatement prior to the commencement of roofing work in affected locations. The original contractor identified by CJPIA for this scope of work also withdrew from the project. CJPIA is currently working to secure a qualified abatement contractor and finalize the scope and cost of that work.

DISCUSSION
Following the withdrawal of S&T Contractors Services, Inc., CJPIA reevaluated project requirements and procurement approach to retain a qualified contractor capable of completing the repairs in compliance with prevailing wage requirements applicable to public works projects. CJPIA subsequently completed a new contractor selection process and identified Tri-Tech Restoration as the replacement contractor for the roofing repairs. CJPIA has negotiated a contract with Tri-Tech Restoration in the amount of $808,953.79 to complete the necessary repairs to the damaged City facilities.

Staff understand that the applicability of prevailing wage requirements was a significant factor in the prior contractor's decision to withdraw from the project before commencing work. The updated contract amount reflects current market pricing and labor costs associated with performing the work in compliance with prevailing wage requirements, as well as refinements to the project scope and construction cost estimates developed since the original contract was approved. As a result, the replacement contract amount is significantly higher than the amount previously approved by the City Council.

Staff recommend City Council approval of the new roofing contract to allow the project to move forward. Approval of the contract at this time will enable PAGE 203 of 341
Tri-Tech Restoration to begin repairs in areas of the City Hall campus where asbestos-containing materials have not been identified while CJPIA continues efforts to secure an abatement contractor for locations requiring hazardous materials remediation.

To support successful delivery of the project, CJPIA and City staff are also finalizing an agreement with Griffin Structures to provide project and construction management services. Griffin Structures will oversee and coordinate the roofing repairs associated with the windstorm claim as well as repairs related to the City's separate water-damage claim at the Fire Station.

The estimated cost attributable to management of the windstorm roofing repairs is approximately $98,111.

Griffin Structures is familiar with the City's facilities, staff, and project delivery expectations, having previously provided project and construction management services for the successful renovation of the San Marino Community Center. Staff believe Griffin Structures' prior experience with City projects will help facilitate efficient coordination among CJPIA, contractors, and City staff and contribute to the timely completion of the repairs. The engagement of Griffin Structures will provide additional oversight and coordination to help ensure successful project delivery.

While CJPIA will manage the procurement and payment for all services, City Council approval is requested for the roofing repair contract because the facilities are City-owned and the work represents a major capital repair.

Staff recommend approval of a Public Works Agreement for the windstormrelated repairs to City facilities with Tri-Tech Restoration in the amount of $808,953.79 and authorization for the Parks and Public Works Director/City Engineer to approve contract change orders necessary for completion of the project, subject to concurrence by CJPIA, with all costs funded by CJPIA.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
The total cost of the proposed roofing contract with Tri-Tech Restoration is $808,953.79. While the proposed contract amount exceeds the previously approved roofing contract, the increase is attributable in part to the project's classification as a public works project subject to prevailing wage requirements and updated construction cost estimates. All project costs will continue to be funded by CJPIA, resulting in no direct fiscal impact on the City's General Fund.

The estimated cost of project and construction management services provided by Griffin Structures attributable to the roofing claim is approximately $98,111 PAGE 204 of 341
and will also be fully funded by CJPIA. Any future asbestos abatement costs will likewise be paid by CJPIA. Accordingly, there is no direct fiscal impact on the City's General Fund.

Procurement for these contracts has been handled in accordance with CJPIA procedures. Since the project is not being paid for by public funds, bidding of the work by the City was not required. City staff have reviewed the proposed scope of work and found it appropriate to address the identified storm-related damage.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend that the City Council (1) approve a Public Works Agreement with Tri-Tech Restoration in the amount of $808,953.79 for roof repairs at Lacy Park and City Hall and (2) authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City, and (3) authorize the Parks and Public Works Director/City Engineer to approve contract change orders necessary for the completion of the project, subject to concurrence by CJPIA, with all costs to be paid by CJPIA as outlined in the agreement. If the Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to (1) approve a Public Works Agreement with Tri-Tech Restoration in the amount of $808,953.79 for windstorm-related roof repairs to City facilities, (2) authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City, and (3) authorize the Parks and Public Works Director/City Engineer to approve contract change orders necessary for the completion of the project, subject to concurrence by the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA), with all costs funded by CJPIA.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. Draft Agreement

2. Estimate for City Hall from Tri-Tech Restoration

3. Estimate for Lacy Park from Tri-Tech Restoration
PAGE 205 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025

PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
Lacy Park and City Hall Facilities Re-Roof
Contract No. 25-08-4376
THIS AGREEMENT “Agreement” is made and entered into this 10th day of June, 2026, by and between the City of San Marino, located in the County of Los Angeles, State of California hereinafter called City, and Tri Tech Restoration, located at 3301 N. San Fernando Blvd., Burbank, CA 91504 hereinafter called Contractor, collectively referred to as the Parties.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, said parties do hereby agree as follows:

Section 1. Recitals.

At its adjourned regular meeting held on June 10, 2026, the City Council duly accepted the bid of Contractor for said Project obtained by the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority’s third-party administrator, Sedgwick, and directed that a written contract be entered into with Contractor.

Section 2. Contract Documents. This Agreement consists of the following documents (“Contract Documents”), all of which are made a part of this Agreement:

2.1 Bid Proposal (Attachment “A” hereto)

2.2 Notice to Proceed

2.3 This Agreement

2.4 Verification of California Contractor’s License

2.5 Contractor’s Certificate Regarding Workers’ Compensation

2.6 Security for payment (labor and materials)

2.7 Security for performance

2.8 Certificate(s) of Insurance

2.9 General Conditions/Specifications

2.10 Special Provisions

2.11 Plans and Standard Drawings
PAGE 206 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025

2.12 Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction “S.S.P.W.C”. or “Greenbook”

2.13 Addenda Nos. N/A

2.14 Other documents (list here)
All of the above-mentioned documents are intended to complement the other documents so that any work called for in one, and not mentioned in the others, or vice versa, is to be executed the same as if mentioned in all of said documents. In the event of a discrepancy between the provisions of the Contractor’s documents and the City’s documents, the City’s documents take precedence with respect to resolution of the discrepancy.

Section 3. The Work.

2.12 Contract Documents Define “Work”. The work (“Work”) to be performed by Contractor is described in the Contract Documents.

2.13 Professional Standards Required. In completing the Work, Contractor must employ, at a minimum, the applicable generally accepted professional standards of its industry in existence at the time of performance as utilized by persons engaging in similar work.

2.14 Contractor Provides All Equipment. Except as specifically provided in the Contract Documents, Contractor must furnish, at its sole expense, all of the labor, materials, tools, equipment, services and transportation necessary to perform all of the Work.

2.15 Contract Documents Strictly Control. Contractor must perform all of the Work in strict accordance with the Contract Documents.

Section 4. Time to Perform the Work.

2.16 Time is of Essence. Time is of the essence with respect to Contractor’s Work. Contractor agrees to diligently pursue performance of the Work within the time specified by the Contract Documents.

2.17 Excusable Delays. Contractor will be excused from any delay in performance or failure to perform due to causes beyond the control of Contractor. Such causes include, but are not limited to, acts of God, acts of terrorism, acts of federal, state or local governments, acts of City, court orders, fires, floods, epidemics, strikes, embargoes, and unusually severe weather.

2.18 Notification of Delays. If Contractor is delayed by any cause beyond Contractor’s control, City may, but is not required to, grant a time extension for the completion of the Work. If delay occurs, Contractor must notify City PAGE 207 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025
in writing within 48 hours of the cause and the extent of the delay and how such delay interferes with Contractor’s performance of the Work.

Section 3. Property Program Claim and Direct Payment by Third-Party Administrator.

The Contractor acknowledges that the City has submitted a claim related to damage sustained to City property during a recent event (“Claim”) to the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority. The California Joint Powers Insurance Authority Property Insurance Program has authorized its thirdparty administrator, Sedgwick (“TPA”) to issue payment for the repair and restoration work covered under this Agreement directly to the Contractor.

Notwithstanding that payment will be made by the TPA, the parties agree as follows:

3.1 Total Compensation. The total Compensation to be paid to the Contractor under this Agreement shall be in an amount not to exceed the Contractor’s Bid Proposal, attached hereto as Attachment “A”. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties understand that conditions encountered in the field may require change orders, which shall be processed consistent with the requirements of the Greenbook. Contractor shall be paid in progress payments, based upon invoices submitted by Contractor, and subject to the standard 5% retention.

3.2 Contracting Parties. This Agreement is solely between the City and the Contractor. Nothing in this provision shall be construed to create any contractual relationship between the Contractor and the TPA or the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority Property Insurance Program.

3.3 Satisfaction of City’s Obligation. Any payments made by the TPA to the Contractor in connection with the Claim shall be deemed payment on behalf of the City and shall satisfy the City’s payment obligation under this Agreement to the extent of such payment.

3.4 Contractor’s Cooperation: The Contractor shall provide all necessary documentation, invoices, certifications, and other information reasonably requested by the City, the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority Property Insurance Program, or the TPA to facilitate processing and payment of the Claim.

3.5 Remaining Obligations. In the event the TPA fails to pay all or part of the amounts due, or if the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority Property Insurance Program disputes coverage in whole or in part, the City shall remain ultimately responsible for payment for the Work performed under this Agreement, in accordance with its terms.

PAGE 208 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025

5.6 No Third-Party Rights: The Contractor shall have no contractual or other rights against the TPA or the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority Property Insurance Program. All rights and remedies arising from or related to this Agreement shall be enforceable solely against the City.

Section 6. Labor Code Requirements.

3.6 Compliance with SB 854 Registration: This Work is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. No prime contractor or subcontractor may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project (submitted on or after March 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. No prime contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project (awarded on or after April 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. The Contractor will be required to post job site notices as described in 8 California Code of Regulation section 16451(d).

3.7 Compliance with Prevailing Wage Laws. Contractor is aware of and will comply with the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., and California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects.

3.8 Penalty Excessive Work Hours. Contractor acknowledges that under California Labor Code sections 1810 and following, 8 hours of labor constitutes a legal day’s work. Contractor will forfeit as a penalty to City the sum of $25.00 for each worker employed in the execution of this Agreement by Contractor or any subcontractor for each calendar day during which such worker is required or permitted to work more than 8 hours in any one calendar day and 40 hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Labor Code section 1810. (Labor Code § 1813.)

3.9 List of Current Prevailing Wages. Copies of the determination of the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute this Agreement will be made available upon request from the Director’s office at 2200 Huntington Dr., San Marino, California 91108.

3.10 Posting of Prevailing Wages Required. Contractor must post at the work site, or if there is no regular work site then at its principal office, for the duration of the Contract, a copy of the determination by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the specified prevailing rate of per diem wages. (Labor Code § 1773.2.)
PAGE 209 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025

6.6 Payment of Prevailing Wages Required. Contractor, and any subcontractor engaged by Contractor, must pay not less than the specified prevailing rate of per diem wages to all workers employed in the execution of the contract. (Labor Code § 1774.) Contractor is responsible for compliance with Labor Code section 1776 relative to the retention and inspection of payroll records.

6.7 Indemnification for Non-Compliance. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

6.8 Penalty for Insufficient Payment. Contractor must comply with all provisions of Labor Code section 1775. Under Section 1775, Contractor may forfeit as a penalty to City up to $50.00 for each worker employed in the execution of the Agreement by Contractor or any subcontractor for each calendar day, or portion thereof, in which the worker is paid less than the prevailing rates.

Contractor may also be liable to pay the difference between the prevailing wage rates and the amount paid to each worker for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for which each worker was paid less than the prevailing wage rate.

6.9 Use of Apprentices. Nothing in this Agreement prevents Contractor or any subcontractor from employing properly registered apprentices in the execution of the Contract. Contractor is responsible for compliance with Labor Code section 1777.5 for all apprenticeable occupations. This statute requires that contractors and subcontractors must submit contract award information to the applicable joint apprenticeship committee, must employ apprentices in apprenticeable occupations in a ratio of not less than one hour of apprentice’s work for every five hours of labor performed by a journeyman (unless an exception is granted under §1777.5), must contribute to the fund or funds in each craft or trade or a like amount to the California Apprenticeship Council, and that contractors and subcontractors must not discriminate among otherwise qualified employees as apprentices solely on the ground of sex, race, religion, creed, national origin, ancestry or color. Only apprentices defined in Labor Code section 3077, who are in training under apprenticeship standards and who have written apprentice contracts, may be employed on public works in apprenticeable occupations.

Section 7. Non-Discrimination.

3.11 No Illegal Discrimination. Contractor shall not discriminate in its recruiting, hiring, promotion, demotion or termination practices on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, or sexual orientation in the performance of this Agreement and shall comply with the provisions of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act as set forth in Part 2.8 of Division 3, Title 2 of the California Government Code; the Federal Civil PAGE 210 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025
Rights Act of 1964, as set forth in Public Law 88-352, and all amendments thereto; Executive Order 11246; and all administrative rules and regulations issued pursuant to such acts and order.

7.2 Compliance With Immigration Laws. Contractor hereby promises and agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Federal Immigration and Nationality Act (8 USCA 1101, et seq.), as amended; and, in connection therewith, shall not employ unauthorized aliens as defined therein. Should Contractor so employ such unauthorized aliens for the performance of work and/or services covered by this Agreement, and should the Federal Government impose sanctions against the City for such use of unauthorized aliens, Contractor hereby agrees to, and shall, reimburse City for the cost of all such sanctions imposed, together with any and all costs, including attorney’s fees, incurred by the City in connection therewith.

Section 8. General Legal Compliance.

3.12 Compliance With All Laws. In performing the Work, Contractor must comply with all applicable statutes, laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, OSHA requirements and the San Marino Municipal Code.

3.13 Permits & Licenses Required. Contractor must, at Contractor’s sole expense, obtain all necessary permits and licenses required for the Work, and give all necessary notices and pay all fees and taxes required by law, including, without limitation, any business license tax imposed by City.

3.14 Contractors License Required. Contractor must maintain a valid California Contractor’s License throughout the term of this Agreement.

Section 9. Clayton and Cartwright Act Assignments. In entering into this Agreement or a contract with a subcontractor to supply goods, services, or materials pursuant to this Agreement for the Project, Contractor and any or subcontractor is deemed to have offered and agreed to assign to City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2, commencing with Section 16700 of Part 2 of Division 7 of the California Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials for the Project. This assignment will be deemed made and will become effective at the time City tenders final payment to Contractor, without further acknowledgement by the Parties.

Section 10. Hazardous waste and unknown conditions.

3.15 Notification of Hazardous Material Required. Contractor shall, without disturbing the condition, notify City in writing as soon as Contractor, or any of Contractor’s subcontractors, agents or employees have knowledge and reporting is possible, of the discovery of any of the following conditions:

PAGE 211 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025

10.1.1 The presence of any material that the Contractor believes is hazardous waste, as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code;

10.1.2 Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those indicated in the specifications; or,

10.1.3 Unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of this character provided for in this Agreement.

10.2 Fencing off Hazardous Material. Pending a determination by City of appropriate action to be taken, Contractor shall provide security measures (e.g., fences) adequate to prevent the hazardous waste or physical conditions from causing bodily injury to any person.

10.3 City’s Investigation of Conditions. City shall promptly investigate the reported conditions. If City, through its Director or director’s designee, and in the exercise of its sole discretion, determines that the conditions do materially differ, or do involve hazardous waste, and will cause a decrease or increase in the Contractor’s cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the Work, then City shall issue a change order.

10.4 No Unapproved Delay For Hazardous Materials. In the event of a dispute between City and Contractor as to whether the conditions materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or increase in the Contractor’s cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the Work, Contractor shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date, and shall proceed with all Work to be performed under the Contract.

Contractor shall retain any and all rights which pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the parties.

Section 11. Independent Contractor. Contractor is and will at all times remain as to City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees, or agents will have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor’s officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, except as expressly set forth in the Contract Documents. Contractor may not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, agents, or subcontractors are in any manner officers, employees, agents or subcontractors of City.

Section 12. Warranty & Guarantee

3.16 New Materials. Contractor guarantees that all materials and equipment furnished will be new unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents.

PAGE 212 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025

12.2 One Year Guarantee. Contractor guarantees all materials and equipment furnished and Work performed for a period of one (1) year from the date of substantial completion is free from all defects due to faulty materials or workmanship. Contractor shall promptly make such corrections as may be necessary by reasons of such defects including the repairs of any damage to other property, whether real or personal. The City will give notice of observed defects with reasonable promptness. If Contractor fails to make such repairs, or other Work that may be made necessary by such defects, the City may do so and charge the Contractor the cost thereby incurred, plus 10% for administrative expenses. The Performance Bond shall remain in full force and effect through the guarantee period. Contractor shall execute the Public Improvement Warranty attached hereto and incorporate hereon by this reference as Attachment "A."
Section 13. Bonds. Contractor shall provide a payment bond and a performance bond consistent with the terms of this section. Each bond shall (1) be in writing; (2) signed by at least one admitted surety insurer under oath; (3) if a bond is signed by more than one surety insurer, include a statement that the sureties are jointly and severally liable on the obligations required hereunder; (4) list the address at which the principal and surety/sureties may be served with notices, papers, and other documents under this chapter; (5) be in the form of a bond and not in a deposit in lieu of a bond; (6) be consistent with any other requirements of the City that reasonably relate to a guarantee that the Project will be completed at no cost to the City.

3.17 Payment Bond. Contractor shall furnish and file with City a bond in the sum of one hundred percent (100%) of the Compensation. Consistent with Civil Code § 3248, the bond shall provide that if the Contractor or any subcontractors hired by Contractor fails to pay (1) any of the persons named in Civil Code § 3181; (2) amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to Work or labor performed under this Agreement; or (3) for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of the contractor and subcontractors pursuant to Unemployment Insurance Code §13020 with respect to the Work and labor that the sureties will pay for the same, and also, in case suit is brought upon the bond, a reasonable attorney’s fee, to be fixed by the court. The bond shall, by its terms, inure to the benefit of any of the persons named in Civil Code § 3181 so as to give a right of action to those persons or their assigns in any suit brought upon the bond. The bond provided under this section shall be released by written authorization of the City Engineer at the completion of the one year warranty period described in section 12.2, above, provided that Contractor is not in default on any provision of this Agreement.

3.18 Performance Bond. Contractor, before commencing said Project, shall furnish and file with City a bond, or bonds, in a form satisfactory to the City, PAGE 213 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025
in the sum of one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof conditioned upon the faithful performance of this Agreement and upon the payment of all labor and materials furnished in connection with this Agreement.

Section 4. Indemnification.

4.1 Contractor shall indemnify, defend with legal counsel approved by City—or, at the City’s option, reimburse the City Indemnitees their costs of defense— and hold harmless City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against all liability, loss, damage, expense, cost (including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with Contractor’s negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct in the performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement. Contractor’s obligations under this section apply regardless of whether or not such claim, charge, damage, demand, action, proceeding, loss, stop notice, cost, expense, judgment, civil fine or penalty, or liability was caused in part or contributed to by an Indemnitee. However, without affecting the rights of City under any provision of this Agreement, Contractor shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless City for liability attributable to the sole active negligence of City, provided such active negligence is determined by Agreement between the parties or by the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction.

In instances where City is shown to have been actively negligent and where City’s active negligence accounts for only a percentage of the liability involved, the obligation of Contractor will be for that entire portion or percentage of liability not attributable to the active negligence of City.

4.2 Should conflict of interest principles preclude a single attorney from representing both City and Contractor, or should City otherwise find Contractor’s attorney unacceptable, then Contractor shall reimburse the City its costs of defense, including without limitation reasonable attorney’s fees, expert fees and all other costs and fees of litigation. The Contractor shall promptly pay any final judgment rendered against the City (and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers) with respect to claims determined by a trier of fact to have been the result of the Contractor’s negligent, reckless, or wrongful performance.

4.3 Payment by City is not a condition precedent to enforcement of this indemnity. In the event of any dispute between Contractor and City, as to whether liability arises from the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its officers, employees, or agents, Contractor will be obligated to pay for City’s defense until such time as a final judgment has been entered adjudicating the City as solely negligent or to have acted with willful misconduct. Contractor will not be entitled in the absence of such a PAGE 214 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025
determination to any reimbursement of defense costs including but not limited to attorney’s fees, expert fees, and costs of litigation.

14.4 It is expressly understood and agreed that the foregoing provisions are intended to be as broad and inclusive as is permitted by the law of the State of California and will survive termination of this Agreement.

Section 15. Insurance. Without limiting Contractor’s indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of Work, Contractor shall obtain, provide, and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement, policies of insurance of the types and amounts described below and in a form that is satisfactory to City.

4.4 General liability insurance. Contractor shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. The policy must include contractual liability that has not been amended. Any endorsement restricting standard ISO “insured contract” language will not be accepted.

4.5 Automobile liability insurance. Contractor shall maintain automobile insurance at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CA 00 01 covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Contractor arising out of or in connection with Work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for any owned, hired, non-owned, or rented vehicles, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for each accident.

4.6 Workers’ compensation insurance. Contractor shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employer’s Liability Insurance (with limits of at least $1,000,000).

4.7 Umbrella or excess liability insurance. [If required to meet higher limits].

Contractor shall obtain and maintain an umbrella liability insurance policy with limits that will provide bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage liability coverage, including commercial general liability, automobile liability, and employer’s liability. Such policy or policies shall include the following terms and conditions:
• A drop-down feature requiring the policy to respond if any primary insurance that would otherwise have applied proves to be uncollectible in whole or in part for any reason, other than bankruptcy or insolvency of said primary insurer;
• “Pay on behalf of” wording as opposed to “reimbursement”; • Concurrency of effective dates with primary policies.

PAGE 215 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025
Should Contractor obtain and maintain an excess liability policy, such policy shall be excess over commercial general liability, automobile liability, and employer’s liability policies. Such policy or policies shall include wording that the excess liability policy follows the terms and conditions of the underlying policies.

15.5 Installation floater. If required by the Agency or not covered by builders’ risk (course of construction) coverage, Contractor shall obtain an installation floater for the value of the property and covering the portion of the work to be constructed, installed, altered, or repaired by Contractor. The installation floater policy must include coverage for the fixtures, materials, supplies, machinery, and equipment used in or incidental to the construction project as well as property kept off-site or while in transit. Coverage must include property of others in the Contractor’s care, custody, or control. In addition to Contractor, the Agency and all subcontractors shall be named as additional insureds on the policy with coverage extending through the final completion date.

15.6 Other provisions or requirements

15.6.1 Contractor shall submit to City, along with the certificate of insurance, a Waiver of Subrogation endorsement in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers.

15.6.2 Proof of insurance. Contractor shall provide certificates of insurance and required endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Insurance certificates and endorsements must be approved by City’s Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with City for the contract period and any additional length of time required thereafter. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, at any time.

15.6.3 Duration of coverage. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the contract period, and any additional length of time required thereafter, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, or financial loss which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the Work hereunder by Contractor, their agents, representatives, employees, or subconsultants.

15.6.4 Primary/non-contributing. Coverage provided by Contractor shall be primary and any insurance or self-insurance procured or maintained by City shall not be required to contribute with it. The limits of insurance required herein may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that PAGE 216 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025
such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of City before the City’s own insurance or selfinsurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured.

15.6.5 Products/completed operations coverage. Products liability coverage shall extend for a minimum of three years (3) after project completion, and completed operations coverage for construction agreements shall extend for 10 years from the date of substantial completion of the project or the statute of repose, whichever is longer. Coverage shall be included on behalf of the insured for covered claims arising out of the actions of independent contractors.

If the insured is using subcontractors, the Policy must include work performed “by or on behalf” of the insured. Policy shall contain no language that would invalidate or remove the insurer’s duty to defend or indemnify for claims or suits expressly excluded from coverage.

Policy shall specifically provide for a duty to defend on the part of the insurer. The Agency, its officials, officers, agents, and employees, shall be included as additional insureds under the Products and Completed Operations coverage.

15.6.6 Agency’s rights of enforcement. In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary, and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Contractor or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Contractor payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement.

15.6.7 Acceptable insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner to transact business of insurance or is on the List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers in the State of California, with an assigned policyholders’ Rating of A- (or higher) and Financial Size Category Class VII (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of Best’s Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City’s Risk Manager.

15.6.8 Waiver of subrogation. All insurance coverage maintained or procured pursuant to this agreement shall be endorsed to waive subrogation against City, its elected or appointed officers, agents, officials, employees, and volunteers or shall specifically allow Contractor or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Contractor hereby waives its own right of recovery against City and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.

PAGE 217 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025

15.6.9 Enforcement of Agreement provisions (non estoppel).

Contractor acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City to inform Contractor of non-compliance with any requirement imposes no additional obligations on the City nor does it waive any rights hereunder.

15.6.10 Requirements not limiting. Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type. If the Contractor maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the Contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.

15.6.11 Notice of cancellation. Contractor agrees to oblige its insurance agent or broker and insurers to provide the City with a thirty (30) day notice of cancellation (except for nonpayment for which a ten (10) day notice is required) or nonrenewal of coverage for each required coverage. If any of the Contractor’s insurers are unwilling to provide such notice, then Contractor shall have the responsibility of notifying the City immediately in the event of Contractor’s failure to renew any of the required insurance coverages or insurer’s cancellation or non-renewal.

15.6.12 Additional insured status. General liability, automobile liability, and umbrella/excess liability insurance policies shall provide or be endorsed to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds under such policies.

15.6.13 Prohibition of undisclosed coverage limitations. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing.

15.6.14 Separation of insureds. A severability of interests provision must apply for all additional insureds ensuring that Contractor’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. The policy(ies) shall not contain any cross-liability exclusions.

PAGE 218 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025

15.6.15 Pass through clause. Contractor agrees to ensure that its subconsultants, subcontractors, and any other party who is brought into or involved in the services by Contractor (hereinafter collectively “Subcontractor”), provide the same minimum insurance coverage and endorsements required of Contractor. Contractor agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. However, in the event Contractor’s Subcontractor cannot comply with this requirement, which proof must be submitted to the City, Contractor may still be able to utilize the Subcontractor provided Contractor shall be required to ensure that its Subcontractor provide and maintain insurance coverage and endorsements sufficient to the specific risk of exposure involved with Subcontractor’s scope of Work and services, with limits less than required of the Contractor, but in all other terms consistent with the Contractor’s requirements under this Agreement. This provision does not relieve the Contractor of its contractual obligations under the Agreement and/or limit its liability to the amount of insurance coverage provided by its Subcontractors. This provision is intended solely to provide Contractor with the ability to utilize a Subcontractor who may be otherwise qualified to perform the Work or services but may not carry the same insurance limits as required of the Contractor under this Agreement given the limited scope of Work or services provided by the Subcontractor. Contractor agrees that upon request, all agreements with Subcontractors, and others engaged in the services, will be submitted to City for review.

15.6.16 Agency’s right to revise specifications. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of the Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Contractor ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Contractor, the City and Contractor may renegotiate Vendor’s compensation.

15.6.17 Self-insured retentions. Any self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City. City reserves the right to require that self-insured retentions be eliminated, lowered, or replaced by a deductible, or require proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention through confirmation from the underwriter.

15.6.18 Timely notice of claims. Vendor shall give City prompt and timely notice of claims made or suits instituted that arise out of or result from Contractor’s performance under this Agreement, and that involve or may involve coverage under any of the required liability policies.

PAGE 219 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025

15.6.19 Additional insurance. Contractor shall also procure and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the Work.

Section 16. Notice of Completion. Upon completion of Project and acceptance of same by the City Council, the City Clerk shall have cause to be recorded a Notice of Completion with the office of the Los Angeles County Recorder; and, after thirty-five (35) days from the date said Notice of Completion is recorded, the Director of Finance of City shall release the funds retained pursuant to Section 3 hereof; provided there have been no mechanics’ liens or stop notices filed against said work which have not been paid, withdrawn or eliminated as liens against said work.

Section 17. Notice.

4.8 All written notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement will be deemed made when received by the other Party at its respective address as follows:

To City: City of San Marino
2200 Huntington Dr.

San Marino, California 91108
Attention: City Manager
(Tel.) 626-300-0765
To Contractor: Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernado Blvd
Burbank, CA 91504
(Tel.) 818-565-3900

4.9 Notice will be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or transmitted by facsimile. If the notice is mailed, notice will be deemed given three days after deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service, postage prepaid, for first class delivery, or upon delivery if using a major courier service with tracking capabilities.

4.10 Any Party may change its notice information by giving notice to the other Party in compliance with this section.

Section 18. Termination
PAGE 220 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025

18.1 Except as otherwise provided, City may terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause. Notice of termination will be in writing.

18.2 Should the Agreement be terminated pursuant to this section, City may procure on its own terms services similar to those terminated.

18.3 By executing this document, Contractor waives any and all claims for damages that might otherwise arise from City’s termination under this section.

18.4 If City takes over the Work as provided in this section, City may, without liability for so doing, take possession of, and utilize in completing the Work, such materials, appliances, plant, and other property belonging to Contractor as may be on the site of the Work and necessary for the completion of the Work.

Section 19. Project Documents. All data, drawings, maps, models, notes, photographs, reports, studies and other documents (collectively, “Project Documents”) prepared, developed or discovered by Contractor in the course of performing any of the Work under this Agreement will become the sole property of City. Upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement, Contractor must turn over all original Contract Documents to City in its possession, but may retain copies of any of the Contract Documents it may desire.

Section 20. General Provisions.

4.11 Authority to Execute. Each Party represents and warrants that all necessary action has been taken by such Party to authorize the undersigned to execute this Agreement and to bind it to the performance of its obligations.

4.12 Assignment. Contractor may not assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of City, which consent may be withheld in the City’s sole discretion since the experience and qualifications of Contractor were material considerations for this Agreement.

4.13 Binding Effect. This Agreement is binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and permitted assigns of the Parties.

4.14 Integrated Contract. This Agreement, including the Contract Documents, is the entire, complete, final and exclusive expression of the Parties with respect to the Work to be performed under this Agreement and supersedes all other agreements or understandings, whether oral or written, between Contractor and City prior to the execution of this Agreement.

4.15 Modification of Contract. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement will be valid unless made in writing and approved by Contractor PAGE 221 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025
and by the City Council or City Manager, as applicable. The Parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver will be void.

20.6 Counterparts and Facsimile Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, and all of which, when taken together, constitute one and the same instrument.

Amendments to this Agreement will be considered executed when the signature of a party is delivered by facsimile transmission. Such facsimile signature will have the same effect as an original signature.

20.7 Waiver. Waiver by any Party of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement will not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement will not constitute a waiver of any other provision, or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement.

Acceptance by City of any Work performed by Contractor will not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement.

20.8 Interpretation. This Agreement will be interpreted, construed and governed according to the laws of the State of California. Each party has had the opportunity to review this Agreement with legal counsel. The Agreement will be construed simply, as a whole, and in accordance with its fair meaning. It will not be interpreted strictly for or against either party.

20.9 Severability. If any term, condition or covenant of this Agreement is declared or determined by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement will not be affected and the Agreement will be read and construed without the invalid, void or unenforceable provision.

20.10 Venue. In the event of litigation between the parties, venue in state trial courts will be in the County of Los Angeles. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue will be in the Central District of California, in Los Angeles.

20.11 Electronic Transmission of Agreement and Signature. The Parties agree that this Agreement may be signed and transmitted by electronic mail by either/any or both/all Parties, and that such signatures shall have the same force and effect as original signatures, in accordance with California Government Code section 16.5 and Civil Code section 1633.7. [Signatures on the following page]
PAGE 222 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025
THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES of the Parties have executed this Agreement as follows:

CITY
CITY OF SAN MARINO, a Municipal
Corporation
ATTEST:
by
________________________________
Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
___________________________________
Alison Walker, City Clerk

CONTRACTOR
________________________________
Tri Tech Restoration
by
________________________________
Name
________________________________
Officer Title (President, VP)
By:
________________________________
Name
________________________________
Officer Title (VP, Treasurer, Secretary)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
JOSEPH M. MONTES, City Attorney
PAGE 223 of 341
Public Works Contract $30,000 or More
Revised-7.2025

ATTACHMENT B

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WARRANTY
On ____________________, 202__, the City of San Marino (“City:”) accepted as complete and meeting the standards of City, the following public improvement(s):
______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________, built and constructed by or for _____________________, ("Contractor") Contractor hereby warrants and guarantees the aforementioned public improvements as to the material used and workmanship performed for a period of one (1) year following the date set forth above.

In the event of a defect, malfunction, or failure to conform the improvement specifications and all applicable local standards, the Contractor shall repair or replace said improvements at Contractor's own and sole expense within a reasonable time from notice of the defect from City. Should Contractor fail to cure any defect within a reasonable period of time, Contractor agrees to reimburse City for any and all costs of City's efforts to cure any defect once City has provided notice to the Contractor of the defect and the City's intent to cure such defect.

Should litigation be necessary to enforce the provisions of this warranty, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursement for attorneys fees and court and related costs.

Executed at________________________, California, on the day and year first written above.
[NOTARY REQUIRED]

CONTRACTOR
By:_______________________________
Signature
By:_______________________________
(Typed Name)
Its:_______________________________
Title
By:_______________________________
Signature
By:_______________________________
(Typed Name)
Its:_______________________________
Title
PAGE 224 of 341

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
PAGE 225 of 341
Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
Insured: SAN MARINO - CITY HALL
Property: 2200 HUNTINGTON DR
SAN MARINO, CA 91108
Claim Rep.: Logan Pase Business: (747) 201-0807
Company: Sedgwick E-mail: [email protected]
Estimator: Ray Boykin Business: (818) 565-3953
Position: Senior Property Estimator E-mail: [email protected] Company: Tri Tech Restoration
Business: 3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Contractor: Tri Tech Restoration Business: (818) 565-3900 Company: Tri Tech Restoration & Construction Co., Inc.

Business: 3301 North San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504-2531
Claim Number: BUR25080890 Policy Number: N/A Type of Loss: Water Damage Coverage Deductible Policy Limit
Dwelling $0.00 $0.00
Other Structures $0.00 $0.00
Contents $0.00 $0.00
Date Contacted: 1/15/2026 8:00 AM
Date of Loss: 1/7/2025 12:00 AM Date Received: 1/14/2026 12:00 AM Date Inspected: 1/16/2026 12:00 AM Date Entered: 1/21/2026 11:20 AM Price List: CALA8X_AUG24 Depreciate Material: No Depreciate O&P: No Depreciate Non-material: No Depreciate Taxes: No
Depreciate Removal: No
Restoration/Service/Remodel
Estimate: CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO-C
PAGE 226 of 341
Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO-C 5/22/2026 Page: 2
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO-C
Level 2
Level 2

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

1. ACT AV++ & R&R Acoustic ceiling tile - Premium grade 8*32 256.00 SF 0.87+ 6.40 = 77.63 387.74 2,326.49
Total: Level 2 77.63 387.74 2,326.49
all Kitchen Office 7
Bathroom 2
Office 1
Office 6
abi2 (B6)
abi2 (B7)
all Kitchen Office 7
Bathroom 2
Office 1
Office 6
abi2 (B6)
abi2 (B7)
13' 7"
13' 9"
3'
1'
1' 2"
6' 6"
6' 8"
2' 11"
10"
6' 11"
4' 1"
3' 11"
5' 2"
Office 6 Height: 8'
342.72 SF Walls
485.20 SF Walls & Ceiling

15.83 SY Flooring

48.14 LF Ceil. Perimeter
142.47 SF Ceiling
142.47 SF Floor

45.23 LF Floor Perimeter
Window 3' X 4' 9" Opens into Exterior
Door 2' 10 15/16" X 6' 11 7/16" Opens into HALLWAY
Window 1' 4 11/16" X 5' 8 1/8" Opens into HALLWAY

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

2. CON LAB + Content Manipulation charge - per hour
2*1 2.00 HR 0.00+ 65.21 = 0.00 26.08 156.50
Two painters 1 hour each to manipulate content for painting

3. PNT MASKSF> + Floor protection - plastic and tape - 10 mil F 142.47 SF 0.00+ 0.45 = 1.67 13.16 78.94

4. PNT SP2 + Seal/prime (1 coat) then paint (2 coats) the walls W 342.72 SF 0.00+ 2.14 = 13.03 149.28 895.73
Totals: Office 6 14.70 188.52 1,131.17
Total: Level 2 92.33 576.26 3,457.66
Exterior
PAGE 227 of 341
3 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO-C 5/22/2026 Page: 3
Roof 1
(A)F5
(B)F6
(C)F7 (D)F8
37'
39' 2"
35'
39' 2"
35'
70'
27' 9"
27' 9" 33'
Roof 1
2895.71 Surface Area
214.00 Total Perimeter Length
111.00 Total Hip Length

28.96 Number of Squares

33.00 Total Ridge Length

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

5. RFG BI + Elastomeric modified asphalt underlayment

1.1SQ 31.85 SQ 0.00+ 692.46 = 499.19 4,510.82 27,064.86

6. RFG TIL+ - Remove Tile roofing - Clay - Barrel (mission) tile SQ 28.96 SQ 285.89+ 0.00 = 0.00 1,655.88 9,935.25

7. RFG TILC++ + Tile roofing - Commercial - Glazed - (Barrel or "S" tile)

1.1SQ 31.85 SQ 0.00+ 1,552.88 = 2,651.99 10,422.24 62,533.46

8. RFG RIDGT + Hip / Ridge / Rake cap - tile roofing
144 144.00 LF 0.00+ 17.10 = 97.30 511.94 3,071.64

9. RFG TILNBW + Hip & ridge nailer board for tile roofing - wood 144 144.00 LF 0.00+ 4.97 = 22.32 147.60 885.60

10. RFG FLRIG + Hip / Ridge flashing
144 144.00 LF 0.00+ 12.50 = 53.63 370.72 2,224.35

11. RFG FLL+ + Flashing - L flashing - color finish
P 214.00 LF 0.00+ 8.18 = 64.47 363.00 2,177.99

12. RFG FLPIPE + Flashing - pipe jack
3 3.00 EA 0.00+ 82.30 = 5.47 50.48 302.85

13. RFG TILBSC + Bird stop - Eave closure strip for tile roofing - clay P 214.00 LF 0.00+ 12.40 = 160.24 562.76 3,376.60

14. RFG VENTE + Exhaust cap - through roof - 6" to 8"
2 2.00 EA 0.00+ 153.25 = 10.03 63.30 379.83

15. SCF RENTW + Scaffold - per section (per week) - pedestrian protection scaffolfing 24*4*3 288.00 WK 0.00+ 60.43 = 0.00 3,480.76 20,884.60

16. SCF SECT + Labor to set up and take down scaffold - per section 96 96.00 EA 0.00+ 41.99 = 0.00 806.20 4,837.24
Totals: Roof 1 3,564.64 22,945.70 137,674.27
PAGE 228 of 341
Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO-C 5/22/2026 Page: 4
Roof 2
(A)F1
(B)F2
Roof 4
(A)F4
(C)F9 (D)F10
Roof 3 F3
Roof 2
(A)F1
(B)F2
Roof 4
(A)F4
(C)F9 (D)F10
Roof 3 F3
58' 3" 22'
21' 1"
22' 1"
21' 2" 16' 2"
15'
16' 2"
15'
29' 11"
11'
28' 9"
Roof 2
2128.91 Surface Area
153.12 Total Perimeter Length

21.29 Number of Squares

73.13 Total Ridge Length

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

17. RFG BI + Elastomeric modified asphalt underlayment

1.1SQ/2 11.71 SQ 0.00+ 692.46 = 183.53 1,658.44 9,950.68

18. RFG TILC++ - Remove Tile roofing - Commercial - Glazed - (Barrel or "S" tile) SQ 21.29 SQ 317.23+ 0.00 = 0.00 1,350.76 8,104.59

19. RFG TILC++ + Tile roofing - Commercial - Glazed - (Barrel or "S" tile)

1.1SQ 23.42 SQ 0.00+ 1,552.88 = 1,950.07 7,663.72 45,982.24

20. RFG RIDGT + Hip / Ridge / Rake cap - tile roofing
R 73.13 LF 0.00+ 17.10 = 49.41 259.98 1,559.91

21. RFG TILNBW + Hip & ridge nailer board for tile roofing - wood R 73.13 LF 0.00+ 4.97 = 11.34 74.96 449.76

22. RFG FLRIG + Hip / Ridge flashing
R 73.13 LF 0.00+ 12.50 = 27.24 188.26 1,129.63

23. RFG FLL+ + Flashing - L flashing - color finish
P/2 76.56 LF 0.00+ 8.18 = 23.07 129.88 779.21

24. RFG FLPIPE + Flashing - pipe jack
3 3.00 EA 0.00+ 82.30 = 5.47 50.48 302.85

25. RFG VMTLW + Valley metal - (W) profile
22 22.00 LF 0.00+ 10.44 = 7.12 47.36 284.16

26. RFG TILBSC + Bird stop - Eave closure strip for tile roofing - clay P/2 76.56 LF 0.00+ 12.40 = 57.33 201.32 1,207.99

27. RFG VENTE + Exhaust cap - through roof - 6" to 8"
2 2.00 EA 0.00+ 153.25 = 10.03 63.30 379.83

28. SCF RENTW + Scaffold - per section (per week) - pedestrian protection scaffolfing 14*3*3 126.00 WK 0.00+ 60.43 = 0.00 1,522.84 9,137.02

29. SCF SECT + Labor to set up and take down scaffold - per section 14*3 42.00 EA 0.00+ 41.99 = 0.00 352.72 2,116.30
Totals: Roof 2 2,324.61 13,564.02 81,384.17
PAGE 229 of 341
5 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO-C 5/22/2026 Page: 5
(A)F1
Roof 4
(A)F4
(C)F9 (D)F10
15' 7"
14' 5"
15' 7"
14' 4"
28' 9"
45' 10"
42' 4"
21' 2"
28'
Roof 4
1318.51 Surface Area
115.81 Total Perimeter Length

42.39 Total Hip Length

13.19 Number of Squares

27.96 Total Ridge Length

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

30. RFG BI + Elastomeric modified asphalt underlayment
1 1.00 SQ AS REQUIRED

31. RFG TILE++ & R&R Tile roofing - Glazed - Barrel or "S" (per TILE) 196 196.00 EA 16.30+ 42.05 = 115.62 2,310.44 13,862.66
Totals: Roof 4 115.62 2,310.44 13,862.66
Total: Exterior 6,004.87 38,820.16 232,921.10
Prevailing Wage Differential

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

32. CLN LAB + Cleaning Technician - labor burden
37 37.00 HR [*] 0.00+ 45.00 = 0.00 333.00 1,998.00

33. DMO LAB - General Demolition - labor burden
183 183.00 HR [*] 45.00+ 0.00 = 0.00 1,647.00 9,882.00

34. DRY LAB + Drywall Installer / Finisher - labor burden 7 7.00 HR [*] 0.00+ 45.00 = 0.00 63.00 378.00

35. LAB LBR + General Laborer - labor burden
97 97.00 HR [*] 0.00+ 45.00 = 0.00 873.00 5,238.00

36. PNT LAB + Painter - labor burden
6 6.00 HR [*] 0.00+ 45.00 = 0.00 54.00 324.00
Totals: Prevailing Wage Differential 0.00 2,970.00 17,820.00 General Conditions
PAGE 230 of 341
6 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO-C 5/22/2026 Page: 6

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

37. TMP TLT + Temporary toilet (per month)
1+1 2.00 MO 0.00+ 242.23 = 0.00 96.90 581.36

38. TMP HWS + Temporary hand washing station (per month) 1+1 2.00 MO 0.00+ 247.00 = 0.00 98.80 592.80

39. CLN GN + General clean - up
24 24.00 HR 0.00+ 66.62 = 0.02 319.78 1,918.68
General cleaning hours to maintain job site and surrounding areas.

40. LAB SUPERC + Commercial Supervision / Project Management - per hour 80 80.00 HR [*] 0.00+ 155.00 = 0.00 2,480.00 14,880.00
1 hour per day for 5 days per week for 4 weeks.

Supervision time is required and is not included in the overhead and profit factors shown at the end of this estimate.

Supervision time will cover:

Time to meet with building inspectors on-site for multiple inspections Time on site to coordinate subcontractors and workers
Time on site to oversee the work and maintain safety standards and quality control Time to document the loss, write supplements, and correspond with adjusters Time to meet with owner to select finishes
Time on site to accept deliveries of materials
Time for the final walk through and punch list items
Time on site for trouble shooting, etc.

53. FEE BONDS + Bond fees
1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 20,092.00 = 0.00 4,018.40 24,110.40

41. FEE TIPF + Taxes, insurance, permits & fees (Bid Item) 1 1.00 EA AS INCURRED

42. DMO DUMP< - Dumpster load - Approx. 12 yards, 1-3 tons of debris 4 4.00 EA 615.16+ 0.00 = 0.00 492.12 2,952.76

43. CLN FINALC + Final cleaning - construction - Commercial 2546 2546.00 SF 0.00+ 0.31 = 0.00 157.86 947.12
Additional damages discovered due to unforeseen conditions or city building code upgrades will be addressed separately and in writing.

No warranty is made or implied as to future performance of the property based on the repair recommendations. This estimate was prepared in order to assist in the evaluation of an insurance claim. This estimate should not be used by any other parties or for other purposes as it may not contain sufficient information for other than the intended use. The scope of repairs may change based on the notations described in the estimate. All issues regarding policy coverages are expressly excluded from this estimate and should be addressed by the claim representative.

Totals: General Conditions 0.02 7,663.86 45,983.12
Line Item Totals: CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO-C 6,097.22 50,030.28 300,181.88 Additional Charges Charge
California Lumber Assessment Fee 123.85
PAGE 231 of 341
Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO-C 5/22/2026 Page: 7
Additional Charges Charge
Additional Charges Total $123.85
Grand Total Areas:
5,030.40 SF Walls 2,092.84 SF Ceiling 7,123.24 SF Walls and Ceiling 2,139.98 SF Floor 237.78 SY Flooring 614.40 LF Floor Perimeter

0.00 SF Long Wall 0.00 SF Short Wall 670.88 LF Ceil. Perimeter 2,139.98 Floor Area 2,254.23 Total Area 4,297.84 Interior Wall Area 1,755.44 Exterior Wall Area 234.13 Exterior Perimeter of Walls
6,438.46 Surface Area 64.38 Number of Squares 0.00 Total Perimeter Length 134.08 Total Ridge Length 153.39 Total Hip Length
PAGE 232 of 341
8 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO-C 5/22/2026 Page: 8
Summary for Dwelling
Line Item Total 244,054.38
California Lumber Assessment Fee 123.85
Material Sales Tax 6,097.22
Subtotal 250,275.45
Overhead 25,027.53
Profit 25,027.53
Replacement Cost Value $300,330.51
Net Claim $300,330.51
Ray Boykin
Senior Property Estimator
PAGE 233 of 341
9 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO-C 5/22/2026 Page: 9
Recap by Room
Estimate: CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO-C
Area: Level 2 1,861.12 0.76%
Office 6 927.95 0.38%
Area Subtotal: Level 2 2,789.07 1.14%
Area: Exterior
Roof 1 111,163.93 45.55%
Roof 2 65,495.54 26.84%
Roof 4 11,436.60 4.69%
Area Subtotal: Exterior 188,096.07 77.07%
Prevailing Wage Differential 14,850.00 6.08%
General Conditions 38,319.24 15.70%
Subtotal of Areas 244,054.38 100.00%
Total 244,054.38 100.00%
PAGE 234 of 341
0 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO-C 5/22/2026 Page: 10
Recap by Category
O&P Items Total %
ACOUSTICAL TREATMENTS 1,638.40 0.55%
CLEANING 4,053.14 1.35%
CONTENT MANIPULATION 130.42 0.04%
GENERAL DEMOLITION 29,146.36 9.70%
DRYWALL 315.00 0.10%
PERMITS AND FEES 20,092.00 6.69%
LABOR ONLY 16,765.00 5.58%
PAINTING 1,067.53 0.36%
ROOFING 139,055.43 46.30%
SCAFFOLDING 30,812.64 10.26%
TEMPORARY REPAIRS 978.46 0.33%
O&P Items Subtotal 244,054.38 81.26%
Permits and Fees 123.85 0.04%
Material Sales Tax 6,097.22 2.03%
Overhead 25,027.53 8.33%
Profit 25,027.53 8.33%
Total 300,330.51 100.00%
PAGE 235 of 341
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO-C 5/22/2026 Page: 11
Level 1
Up
Up
Stairs 4
Landing (1)
Landing (3)
Landing (2) Stairs (4)
Stairs 3
Stairs 4
Landing (1)
Landing (3)
Landing (2) Stairs (4)
Stairs 3
Level 1
17' 8"18' 4"
3' 8" 3' 8"
17' 10"
18' 2"
7' 9"
8' 5"
3' 10"
3' 5"
6"
4' 6"
4' 1"
3' 11"
4' 10"
9' 8"
3' 6"
3' 2"
PAGE 236 of 341
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO-C 5/22/2026 Page: 12
Exterior
Roof 1
(A)F5(B)F6
(C)F7 (D)F8
(A)F1
Roof 2
(B)F2
Roof 4
(A)F4
(C)F9 (D)F10
Roof 3 F3
Roof 1
(A)F5(B)F6
(C)F7 (D)F8
(A)F1
Roof 2
(B)F2
Roof 4
(A)F4
(C)F9 (D)F10
Roof 3 F3
Exterior
37'
39' 2"
35'
39' 2"
35'
70'
27' 9"
27' 9"
33'
58' 3"
22' 21' 1"
1"1"
22' 1" 21' 2"
16' 2"
15'
16' 2"
15'
29' 11"
11'
15' 7"14' 5"
15' 7"14' 4"
28' 9"
45' 10"
42' 4"
21' 2"
28'
8' 8"
8'
42' 4"
PAGE 237 of 341
3 CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO-C 5/22/2026 Page: 13
Level 2
Office 2 Office 3
City Hall Kitchen Office 7
Bathroom 2
Office 1
Bathroom 1
Hallway
Office 4
Office 6
Office 5
Upper Cabi1 (B1) Lower Cabi1 (B2)
Lower Cabi2 (B6) Upper Cabi2 (B7) Over Fridg3 (B3)
Office 2 Office 3
City Hall Kitchen Office 7
Bathroom 2
Office 1
Bathroom 1
Hallway
Office 4
Office 6
Office 5
Upper Cabi1 (B1) Lower Cabi1 (B2)
Lower Cabi2 (B6) Upper Cabi2 (B7) Over Fridg3 (B3)
Level 2
2' 1"
2'
6' 10"
1'
1'
2' 6"3'
10' 7"
65' 4"
5' 11"
16' 9"
12' 8"
8' 6"
9' 2"
13' 8"
27'
14'
33' 10"
4' 10"
9' 9"
6' 8"
2' 1" 13' 7"
18' 10"
11' 7"
7' 4"
8'
7' 3"
4' 10" 2' 9"
2' 7" 4' 10"
14' 8"
21' 8"
13' 11"
10' 6"
9' 4"
8"
3'
2' 8"
4' 7"
8"
5' 2"
5' 5"
20' 1"
19' 4"
12' 10"
30' 7"
10' 6"
13' 11"
3' 10" 3' 10"
PAGE 238 of 341

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
PAGE 239 of 341
Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
Insured: SAN MARINO - OFFICE/MAINTENANCE BLDG
Property: 1485 VIRGINIA RD
SAN MARINO, CA 91108
Claim Rep.: Logan Pase Business: (747) 201-0807
Company: Sedgwick E-mail: [email protected]
Estimator: Ray Boykin Business: (818) 565-3953
Position: Senior Property Estimator E-mail: [email protected] Company: Tri Tech Restoration
Business: 3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Contractor: Tri Tech Restoration Business: (818) 565-3900 Company: Tri Tech Restoration & Construction Co., Inc.

Business: 3301 North San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504-2531
Claim Number: BUR25080890 Policy Number: N/A Type of Loss: Water Damage Coverage Deductible Policy Limit
Dwelling $0.00 $0.00
Other Structures $0.00 $0.00
Contents $0.00 $0.00
Code Upgrades $0.00 $0.00
Date Contacted: 1/15/2026 8:15 AM
Date of Loss: 1/7/2025 12:00 AM Date Received: 1/14/2026 12:00 AM Date Inspected: 1/16/2026 12:00 AM Date Entered: 1/21/2026 11:20 AM Price List: CALA8X_JAN26 Depreciate Material: No Depreciate O&P: No Depreciate Non-material: No Depreciate Taxes: No
Depreciate Removal: No
Restoration/Service/Remodel
Estimate: CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO
PAGE 240 of 341
Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 2
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO

OFFICE BLDG
STORAGE RM 1
STORAGE RM 2
5' 8"
7' 6"
8'
5'
5' 2"
3' 4"
3' 8"
4' 6"
STORAGE RM 1 Height: 8'
177.78 SF Walls
215.28 SF Walls & Ceiling

4.17 SY Flooring

25.00 LF Ceil. Perimeter

37.50 SF Ceiling

37.50 SF Floor

21.67 LF Floor Perimeter
Missing Wall - Goes to Floor 3' 4" X 6' 8" Opens into Exterior

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

1. CLN LAB + Cleaning Technician - per hour
2*4 8.00 HR 0.00+ 66.61 = 0.00 106.58 639.46

2. PLA APG5/8 + Acoustic plaster over 5/8" gypsum core blueboard C 37.50 SF 0.00+ 16.54 = 9.54 125.96 755.75

3. PLA MASKLF + Mask wall - plastic, paper, tape (per LF) PC 25.00 LF 0.00+ 2.56 = 0.66 12.94 77.60

4. CON LAB + Content Manipulation charge - per hour
8 8.00 HR 0.00+ 65.21 = 0.00 104.34 626.02
Totals: STORAGE RM 1 10.20 349.82 2,098.83
STORAGE RM 1
STORAGE RM 2
3'5'
15'
15' 6"
8'
8' 8"
3' 6"
6"
10"
11'
11' 4"
STORAGE RM 2 Height: 8'
344.67 SF Walls
464.67 SF Walls & Ceiling

13.33 SY Flooring

46.00 LF Ceil. Perimeter
120.00 SF Ceiling
120.00 SF Floor

42.50 LF Floor Perimeter
Missing Wall - Goes to Floor 3' 6" X 6' 8" Opens into Exterior

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

5. CLN LAB + Cleaning Technician - per hour
2*4 8.00 HR 0.00+ 66.61 = 0.00 106.58 639.46

6. PLA APG5/8 + Acoustic plaster over 5/8" gypsum core blueboard C 120.00 SF 0.00+ 16.54 = 30.54 403.06 2,418.40
PAGE 241 of 341
3 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 3
CONTINUED - STORAGE RM 2

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

7. PLA MASKLF + Mask wall - plastic, paper, tape (per LF) PC 46.00 LF 0.00+ 2.56 = 1.21 23.80 142.77

8. CON LAB + Content Manipulation charge - per hour
8 8.00 HR 0.00+ 65.21 = 0.00 104.34 626.02
Totals: STORAGE RM 2 31.75 637.78 3,826.65
Total: OFFICE BLDG 41.95 987.60 5,925.48

OFFICE ROOF
Roof1
(A)F1
(B)F2
Roof2
(A)F3 (B)F4
Roof3
F5
Roof1
(A)F1
(B)F2
Roof2
(A)F3 (B)F4
Roof3
F5
37'
5'
16'
15' 2"
16'
15' 2"
30' 4"
21' 11"
21' 11"
Roof1
917.07 Surface Area
105.95 Total Perimeter Length

9.17 Number of Squares

37.00 Total Ridge Length

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

9. RFG BI + Elastomeric modified asphalt underlayment

1.1SQ 10.09 SQ 0.00+ 692.46 = 158.14 1,429.00 8,574.06

10. RFG TIL+ - Remove Tile roofing - Clay - Barrel (mission) tile SQ 9.17 SQ 285.89+ 0.00 = 0.00 524.32 3,145.93

11. RFG TILC++ + Tile roofing - Commercial - Glazed - (Barrel or "S" tile)

1.05SQ 9.63 SQ [*] 0.00+ 1,216.43 = 813.25 2,505.50 15,032.97

12. RFG RIDGT + Hip / Ridge / Rake cap - tile roofing
R 37.00 LF 0.00+ 17.10 = 25.00 131.54 789.24

13. RFG TILNBW + Hip & ridge nailer board for tile roofing - wood R 37.00 LF 0.00+ 4.97 = 5.74 37.92 227.55

14. RFG FLRIG + Hip / Ridge flashing
R 37.00 LF 0.00+ 12.50 = 13.78 95.26 571.54

15. RFG FLL+ + Flashing - L flashing - color finish
P 105.95 LF 0.00+ 8.18 = 31.92 179.72 1,078.31
PAGE 242 of 341
Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 4
CONTINUED - Roof1

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

16. RFG FLPIPE + Flashing - pipe jack
3 3.00 EA 0.00+ 82.30 = 5.47 50.48 302.85

17. RFG VMTLW + Valley metal - (W) profile
22*2 44.00 LF 0.00+ 10.44 = 14.24 94.72 568.32

18. RFG TILBSC + Bird stop - Eave closure strip for tile roofing - clay P 105.95 LF 0.00+ 12.40 = 79.34 278.62 1,671.74

19. RFG VENTE + Exhaust cap - through roof - 6" to 8"
2 2.00 EA 0.00+ 153.25 = 10.03 63.30 379.83
Totals: Roof1 1,156.91 5,390.38 32,342.34
Roof1
(A)F1
(B)F2
Roof2
(A)F3 (B)F4
Roof3
F5
Roof1
(A)F1
(B)F2
Roof2
(A)F3 (B)F4
Roof3
F5 1'
11"
24' 1"
16' 10"
16'
16' 10"
16' 32'
21' 11"
21' 11"
Roof2
1081.32 Surface Area

83.83 Total Perimeter Length

10.81 Number of Squares

39.17 Total Ridge Length

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

20. RFG BI + Elastomeric modified asphalt underlayment

1.1SQ 11.89 SQ 0.00+ 692.46 = 186.35 1,683.96 10,103.66

21. RFG TIL+ - Remove Tile roofing - Clay - Barrel (mission) tile SQ 10.81 SQ 285.89+ 0.00 = 0.00 618.10 3,708.57

22. RFG TILC++ + Tile roofing - Commercial - Glazed - (Barrel or "S" tile)

1.05SQ 11.35 SQ [*] 0.00+ 1,216.43 = 958.50 2,953.00 17,717.98

23. RFG RIDGT + Hip / Ridge / Rake cap - tile roofing
R 39.17 LF 0.00+ 17.10 = 26.47 139.26 835.54

24. RFG TILNBW + Hip & ridge nailer board for tile roofing - wood R 39.17 LF 0.00+ 4.97 = 6.07 40.16 240.90

25. RFG FLRIG + Hip / Ridge flashing
R 39.17 LF 0.00+ 12.50 = 14.59 100.84 605.06

26. RFG FLL+ + Flashing - L flashing - color finish
P 83.83 LF 0.00+ 8.18 = 25.26 142.20 853.19
PAGE 243 of 341
5 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 5
CONTINUED - Roof2

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

27. RFG FLPIPE + Flashing - pipe jack
3 3.00 EA 0.00+ 82.30 = 5.47 50.48 302.85

28. RFG TILBSC + Bird stop - Eave closure strip for tile roofing - clay P 83.83 LF 0.00+ 12.40 = 62.77 220.46 1,322.72

29. RFG VENTE + Exhaust cap - through roof - 6" to 8"
2 2.00 EA 0.00+ 153.25 = 10.03 63.30 379.83

30. SFG GUTA> + Gutter / downspout - aluminum - 6"
66 66.00 LF 0.00+ 15.05 = 53.35 209.34 1,255.99
Totals: Roof2 1,348.86 6,221.10 37,326.29
Roof3
F5
6' 7"
8' 3"
7' 2"
Roof3

54.59 Surface Area

29.75 Total Perimeter Length

0.55 Number of Squares

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

31. RFG BIM - Remove Modified bitumen roof - hot mopped SQ 0.55 SQ 77.84+ 0.00 = 0.00 8.56 51.37

32. RFG BIM + Modified bitumen roof - hot mopped

1.05SQ 0.57 SQ 0.00+ 729.15 = 10.34 85.18 511.14

33. RFG DRIP & R&R Drip edge
P 29.75 LF 0.52+ 4.36 = 3.42 29.72 178.32
Totals: Roof3 13.76 123.46 740.83
Total: OFFICE ROOF 2,519.53 11,734.94 70,409.46

MAINTENANCE BLDG
PAGE 244 of 341
6 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 6
Garage 1
Garage Storage Rm
Main Garage
Garage Rm 1
Garage Rm2
38' 6"
39' 2"
14' 2"
14'
3' 25' 1"
10' 8" 6"
10"
27' 4"
27' 8"
12'
12' 3"
12' 7"
14' 7"
12'
25' 5"
25' 9"
1' 1"
1' 5"
3' 9' 10"
Main Garage Height: 12'
1329.33 SF Walls
2433.00 SF Walls & Ceiling
122.63 SY Flooring
134.33 LF Ceil. Perimeter
1103.67 SF Ceiling
1103.67 SF Floor

93.67 LF Floor Perimeter
Door 3' X 6' 8" Opens into GARAGE_1
Door 10' 8" X 7' Opens into Exterior
Door 12' X 7' Opens into Exterior
Door 12' X 7' Opens into Exterior
Door 3' X 6' 8" Opens into GARAGE_RM_1

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

34. FRM SHORING + Temporary shoring
1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 875.00 = 0.00 175.00 1,050.00

35. ELE LAB + Electrician - per hour
2*8*3 48.00 HR 0.00+ 143.78 = 0.00 1,380.28 8,281.72

36. LIT FL+ + Fluorescent light fixture - High grade
12 12.00 EA 0.00+ 180.64 = 114.51 456.44 2,738.63

37. LIT BLLT4 + Light bulb - LED tube - 4' - material only 48 48.00 EA 0.00+ 22.15 = 103.66 233.38 1,400.24

38. CLN PWASH++ + Clean with pressure/chemical spray - Very heavy W+F 2433.00 SF 0.00+ 1.23 = 4.74 599.46 3,596.79

39. PNT DORT + Paint door/window trim & jamb - 2 coats (per side) 2 2.00 EA 0.00+ 52.55 = 1.29 21.28 127.67

40. PNT XDOR + Prime & paint door slab only - exterior (per side) 2 2.00 EA 0.00+ 71.92 = 3.44 29.44 176.72

41. DOR OHRSPRG + Overhead door - torsion spring only (single) 3 3.00 EA 0.00+ 164.73 = 17.55 102.36 614.10

42. DOR OHS12> + Commercial overhead door, 12' x 8' - softwood overlay 2 2.00 EA 0.00+ 6,789.28 = 1,242.35 2,964.20 17,785.11

43. DOR OHS10> + Commercial overhead door, 10' x 8' - softwood overlay 1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 5,699.75 = 514.94 1,242.94 7,457.63
Totals: Main Garage 2,002.48 7,204.78 43,228.61
PAGE 245 of 341
Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 7
Garage 1 Main Garage
19' 4"
20' 4"
28' 8"
30'
10' 4"
8' 6"
8' 10"
6"
1' 2"
3' 6"
3' 10"
12' 10"
13' 6"
3' 25' 1"
Garage 1 Height: 12'
1039.67 SF Walls
1593.89 SF Walls & Ceiling

61.58 SY Flooring

96.00 LF Ceil. Perimeter
554.22 SF Ceiling
554.22 SF Floor

79.67 LF Floor Perimeter
Door 3' X 6' 8" Opens into Exterior
Door 10' 4" X 7' Opens into Exterior
Door 3' X 6' 8" Opens into MAIN_GARAGE

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

44. ELE LAB + Electrician - per hour
2*8*2 32.00 HR 0.00+ 143.78 = 0.00 920.20 5,521.16

45. LIT FL+ + Fluorescent light fixture - High grade
6 6.00 EA 0.00+ 180.64 = 57.25 228.22 1,369.31

46. LIT BLLT4 + Light bulb - LED tube - 4' - material only 24 24.00 EA 0.00+ 22.15 = 51.83 116.68 700.11

47. CLN PWASH++ + Clean with pressure/chemical spray - Very heavy W+F 1593.89 SF 0.00+ 1.23 = 3.11 392.72 2,356.31

48. PNT DORT + Paint door/window trim & jamb - 2 coats (per side) 2 2.00 EA 0.00+ 52.55 = 1.29 21.28 127.67

49. PNT XDOR + Prime & paint door slab only - exterior (per side) 2 2.00 EA 0.00+ 71.92 = 3.44 29.44 176.72

50. DOR OHRSPRG + Overhead door - torsion spring only (single) 1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 164.73 = 5.85 34.12 204.70

51. DOR OHS10> + Commercial overhead door, 10' x 8' - softwood overlay 1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 5,699.75 = 514.94 1,242.94 7,457.63

52. DOR WDBFR + Wood door - birch face, fire rated (mineral fiber core) 1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 451.69 = 34.03 97.14 582.86

53. FNH HING4 + Door hinge, 4" ball bearing (set of 3)
1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 73.90 = 2.77 15.34 92.01

54. FNH DBX++ + Door lockset & deadbolt - exterior - Premium grade 1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 258.30 = 21.24 55.90 335.44
Totals: Garage 1 695.75 3,153.98 18,923.92
PAGE 246 of 341
8 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 8
Garage Storage Rm
Garage Rm2
7' 10"
7' 6"
5'
6'
5' 8"
5'
1' 3"
1' 11"
1' 3"
1' 11"
Garage Storage Rm Height: 8'
166.67 SF Walls
204.17 SF Walls & Ceiling

4.17 SY Flooring

25.00 LF Ceil. Perimeter

37.50 SF Ceiling

37.50 SF Floor

20.00 LF Floor Perimeter
Door 5' X 6' 8" Opens into Exterior

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

55. DOR X2 + Exterior door - double - metal - insul. - flush or panel 1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 763.53 = 47.01 162.10 972.64

56. FNH HING4 + Door hinge, 4" ball bearing (set of 3)
1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 73.90 = 2.77 15.34 92.01

57. FNH DBX++ + Door lockset & deadbolt - exterior - Premium grade 1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 258.30 = 21.24 55.90 335.44

58. PNT XDOR + Prime & paint door slab only - exterior (per side) 2 2.00 EA 0.00+ 71.92 = 3.44 29.44 176.72

59. PNT DORT> + Paint door/window trim & jamb - Large - 2 coats (per side) 1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 61.82 = 0.76 12.52 75.10
Totals: Garage Storage Rm 75.22 275.30 1,651.91
Total: MAINTENANCE BLDG 2,773.45 10,634.06 63,804.44

MAINTENANCE BLDG ROOF
Roof1
(A)F1
(B)F2
Roof2 F3
72'
19'18'
19'18'
36'
Roof1
2732.21 Surface Area
219.89 Total Perimeter Length

27.32 Number of Squares

72.00 Total Ridge Length

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

60. RFG BIM - Remove Modified bitumen roof - hot mopped SQ 27.32 SQ 72.99+ 0.00 = 0.00 398.82 2,392.91
PAGE 247 of 341
9 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 9
CONTINUED - Roof1

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

61. RFG BIM + Modified bitumen roof - hot mopped
SQ 27.32 SQ 0.00+ 729.15 = 495.77 4,083.24 24,499.39

62. RFG BIGFLM + Bitumen roof - Add. glass felt layer - hot mopped appl.

1.1SQ 30.05 SQ 0.00+ 183.06 = 71.61 1,114.52 6,687.08

63. RFG DRIP + Drip edge
P 219.89 LF 0.00+ 4.36 = 25.30 196.80 1,180.82
Totals: Roof1 592.68 5,793.38 34,760.20
Roof2
F3
9' 4"
7' 8"
6' 7" Roof2

71.90 Surface Area

34.07 Total Perimeter Length

0.72 Number of Squares

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

64. RFG BIM - Remove Modified bitumen roof - hot mopped SQ 0.72 SQ 72.99+ 0.00 = 0.00 10.52 63.07

65. RFG BIM + Modified bitumen roof - hot mopped

1.1SQ 0.79 SQ 0.00+ 729.15 = 14.34 118.06 708.43

66. RFG BIGFLM + Bitumen roof - Add. glass felt layer - hot mopped appl.

1.1SQ 0.79 SQ 0.00+ 183.06 = 1.88 29.30 175.80

67. RFG DRIP + Drip edge
P 34.07 LF 0.00+ 4.36 = 3.92 30.50 182.97

68. RFG FLCTR + Counterflashing - Apron flashing
9 9.00 LF 0.00+ 18.47 = 1.83 33.60 201.66
Totals: Roof2 21.97 221.98 1,331.93
Total: MAINTENANCE BLDG ROOF 614.65 6,015.36 36,092.13
Maintenance Bldg
PAGE 248 of 341
0 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 10
Front Elevation

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

69. CLN MAS + Clean masonry
390 390.00 SF 0.00+ 1.00 = 0.76 78.16 468.92

70. FCS ACID + Acid wash masonry wall
390 390.00 SF 0.00+ 4.19 = 4.18 327.66 1,965.94

71. PNT MAS + Seal block with masonry sealer
390 390.00 SF 0.00+ 1.38 = 17.11 111.06 666.37

72. PNT SP2 + Seal/prime (1 coat) then paint (2 coats) the surface area 390 390.00 SF 0.00+ 2.14 = 14.83 169.88 1,019.31

73. PNT MASKLF + Mask and prep for paint - plastic, paper, tape (per LF) 80 80.00 LF 0.00+ 2.21 = 2.11 35.78 214.69

74. PNT FACW> + Prime & paint exterior fascia - wood, 6"- 8" wide 74 74.00 LF 0.00+ 3.58 = 2.02 53.38 320.32

75. PNT SFTR + Prime & paint exterior soffit - exposed rafters 68*2'8 181.33 SF 0.00+ 5.10 = 18.03 188.56 1,131.37

76. PNT SFTR + Prime & paint exterior soffit - exposed rafters 12 12.00 SF 0.00+ 5.10 = 1.19 12.48 74.87

77. PNT OH + Paint overhead door - 2 coats (per side)
4 4.00 EA 0.00+ 193.27 = 23.59 159.34 956.01

78. PNT XDOR + Prime & paint door slab only - exterior (per side) 1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 71.92 = 1.72 14.72 88.36

79. PNT OHDORT + Seal & paint single garage door opening & trim 4 4.00 EA 0.00+ 169.72 = 4.10 136.60 819.58

80. PNT DORT + Paint door/window trim & jamb - 2 coats (per side) 1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 52.55 = 0.64 10.64 63.83

81. SCF RENTW + Scaffold - per section (per week)
10 10.00 WK 0.00+ 65.36 = 0.00 130.72 784.32

82. SCF SECT + Labor to set up and take down scaffold - per section 10 10.00 EA 0.00+ 44.67 = 0.00 89.34 536.04

83. SFG GUTA> + Gutter / downspout - aluminum - 6"
88 88.00 LF 0.00+ 15.05 = 71.13 279.10 1,674.63
Totals: Front Elevation 161.41 1,797.42 10,784.56
Rear Elevation

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL
PAGE 249 of 341
Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 11
CONTINUED - Rear Elevation

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

84. CLN MAS + Clean masonry
750 750.00 SF 0.00+ 1.00 = 1.46 150.30 901.76

85. FCS ACID + Acid wash masonry wall
750 750.00 SF 0.00+ 4.19 = 8.04 630.10 3,780.64

86. PNT MAS + Seal block with masonry sealer
750 750.00 SF 0.00+ 1.38 = 32.91 213.58 1,281.49

87. PNT SP2 + Seal/prime (1 coat) then paint (2 coats) the surface area 750 750.00 SF 0.00+ 2.14 = 28.52 326.70 1,960.22

88. PNT MASKLF + Mask and prep for paint - plastic, paper, tape (per LF) 80 80.00 LF 0.00+ 2.21 = 2.11 35.78 214.69

89. PNT FACW> + Prime & paint exterior fascia - wood, 6"- 8" wide 74 74.00 LF 0.00+ 3.58 = 2.02 53.38 320.32

90. PNT SFTR + Prime & paint exterior soffit - exposed rafters 68*2'8 181.33 SF 0.00+ 5.10 = 18.03 188.56 1,131.37

91. PNT SFTR + Prime & paint exterior soffit - exposed rafters 12 12.00 SF 0.00+ 5.10 = 1.19 12.48 74.87

92. SCF RENTW + Scaffold - per section (per week)
10 10.00 WK 0.00+ 65.36 = 0.00 130.72 784.32

93. SCF SECT + Labor to set up and take down scaffold - per section 10 10.00 EA 0.00+ 44.67 = 0.00 89.34 536.04
Totals: Rear Elevation 94.28 1,830.94 10,985.72
Right Elevation

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

94. CLN MAS + Clean masonry
355 355.00 SF 0.00+ 1.00 = 0.69 71.14 426.83

95. FCS ACID + Acid wash masonry wall
355 355.00 SF 0.00+ 4.19 = 3.81 298.26 1,789.52

96. PNT MAS + Seal block with masonry sealer
355 355.00 SF 0.00+ 1.38 = 15.58 101.10 606.58

97. PNT SP2 + Seal/prime (1 coat) then paint (2 coats) the surface area 355 355.00 SF 0.00+ 2.14 = 13.50 154.64 927.84
PAGE 250 of 341
Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 12
CONTINUED - Right Elevation

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL

98. PNT MASKLF + Mask and prep for paint - plastic, paper, tape (per LF) 38 38.00 LF 0.00+ 2.21 = 1.00 17.00 101.98

99. PNT FACW> + Prime & paint exterior fascia - wood, 6"- 8" wide 40 40.00 LF 0.00+ 3.58 = 1.09 28.86 173.15
100. PNT SFTR + Prime & paint exterior soffit - exposed rafters 40*2 80.00 SF 0.00+ 5.10 = 7.96 83.20 499.16
101. PNT SFTR + Prime & paint exterior soffit - exposed rafters 12 12.00 SF 0.00+ 5.10 = 1.19 12.48 74.87
102. PNT XDOR + Prime & paint door slab only - exterior (per side) 2 2.00 EA 0.00+ 71.92 = 3.44 29.44 176.72
103. PNT DORT> + Paint door/window trim & jamb - Large - 2 coats (per side) 1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 61.82 = 0.76 12.52 75.10
104. SCF RENTW + Scaffold - per section (per week)
6 6.00 WK 0.00+ 65.36 = 0.00 78.44 470.60
105. SCF SECT + Labor to set up and take down scaffold - per section 6 6.00 EA 0.00+ 44.67 = 0.00 53.60 321.62
Totals: Right Elevation 49.02 940.68 5,643.97
Left Elevation

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL
106. CLN MAS + Clean masonry
355 355.00 SF 0.00+ 1.00 = 0.69 71.14 426.83
107. FCS ACID + Acid wash masonry wall
355 355.00 SF 0.00+ 4.19 = 3.81 298.26 1,789.52
108. PNT MAS + Seal block with masonry sealer
355 355.00 SF 0.00+ 1.38 = 15.58 101.10 606.58
109. PNT SP2 + Seal/prime (1 coat) then paint (2 coats) the surface area 355 355.00 SF 0.00+ 2.14 = 13.50 154.64 927.84
110. PNT MASKLF + Mask and prep for paint - plastic, paper, tape (per LF) 38 38.00 LF 0.00+ 2.21 = 1.00 17.00 101.98
111. PNT FACW> + Prime & paint exterior fascia - wood, 6"- 8" wide 40 40.00 LF 0.00+ 3.58 = 1.09 28.86 173.15
PAGE 251 of 341
3 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 13
CONTINUED - Left Elevation

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL
112. PNT SFTR + Prime & paint exterior soffit - exposed rafters 40*2 80.00 SF 0.00+ 5.10 = 7.96 83.20 499.16
113. PNT SFTR + Prime & paint exterior soffit - exposed rafters 12 12.00 SF 0.00+ 5.10 = 1.19 12.48 74.87
114. SCF RENTW + Scaffold - per section (per week)
6 6.00 WK 0.00+ 65.36 = 0.00 78.44 470.60
115. SCF SECT + Labor to set up and take down scaffold - per section 6 6.00 EA 0.00+ 44.67 = 0.00 53.60 321.62
Totals: Left Elevation 44.82 898.72 5,392.15
Total: Maintenance Bldg 349.53 5,467.76 32,806.40

DEMOLITION

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL
116. DMO LAB - General Demolition - per hour
6*8*10 480.00 HR 69.08+ 0.00 = 0.00 6,631.68 39,790.08
117. DMO DUMP>> - Dumpster load - Approx. 40 yards, 7-8 tons of debris 6 6.00 EA 1,399.05+ 0.00 = 0.00 1,678.86 10,073.16
Totals: DEMOLITION 0.00 8,310.54 49,863.24
Framing

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL
118. FRM RF8LF M Material Only Rafters - 2x8 - stick frame roof (using rafter length) 1960+136 2096.00 LF 0.00+ 1.71 = 349.46 786.74 4,720.36 119. FRM 2X4 M Material Only 2" x 4" lumber (.667 BF per LF) 1276 1276.00 LF 0.00+ 0.77 = 95.80 215.66 1,293.98
PAGE 252 of 341
Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 14
CONTINUED - Framing

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL
120. FRM SH5/8 M Material Only Sheathing - plywood - 5/8" CDX 2980 2980.00 SF 0.00+ 1.13 = 328.32 739.14 4,434.86
121. FRM LAB + Carpenter - General Framer - per hour
5*8*10 400.00 HR 0.00+ 115.02 = 0.00 9,201.60 55,209.60 122. FRM SH2X6TG M Material Only Sheathing - 2" x 6" - tongue and groove 2222/2 1111.00 SF 0.00+ 6.98 = 756.09 1,702.18 10,213.05 123. FRM 4X6X12E + 4" x 6" x 12' - engineered strand lumber - material only 1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 136.94 = 13.35 30.06 180.35
124. FRM FRHT + Framing hurricane tie
152 152.00 EA 0.00+ 11.88 = 24.45 366.06 2,196.27
125. FRM FRHNG + Framing hanger - 2" x 6" or 2" x 8"
76 76.00 EA 0.00+ 19.30 = 42.01 301.76 1,810.57
126. FRM WASHERS + Framing bolt washers
34 34.00 EA 0.00+ 12.77 = 0.00 86.84 521.02
127. FRM AB5/8> + Wedge anchor bolt - 5/8" x 8 1/2"
16 16.00 EA 0.00+ 20.79 = 5.85 67.70 406.19
128. CNC COR1 + Concrete core drilling - 1" diameter x 1" deep 15*5 75.00 EA 0.00+ 17.39 = 0.00 260.86 1,565.11
129. CNC EPX + Epoxy injection - concrete repair (per LF of crack) 7 7.00 LF 0.00+ 102.95 = 1.45 144.44 866.54
Totals: Framing 1,616.78 13,903.04 83,417.90

PREVAILING WAGE DIFFERENTIAL

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL
130. CLN LAB + Cleaning Technician - labor burden
169 169.00 HR [*] 0.00+ 50.00 = 0.00 1,690.00 10,140.00 131. DMO LABOR - GENERAL DEMOLITION - labor burden
576 576.00 EA 45.00+ 0.00 = 0.00 5,184.00 31,104.00
132. ELE LAB + Electrician - labor burden
91 91.00 HR [*] 0.00+ 45.00 = 0.00 819.00 4,914.00
133. FNC LAB + Finish Carpenter - labor burden
6 6.00 HR [*] 0.00+ 50.00 = 0.00 60.00 360.00
PAGE 253 of 341
5 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 15

CONTINUED - PREVAILING WAGE DIFFERENTIAL

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL
134. FRM LAB + Carpenter - General Framer - labor burden 598 598.00 HR [*] 0.00+ 50.00 = 0.00 5,980.00 35,880.00 135. LAB LBR + General Laborer - labor burden
38 38.00 HR [*] 0.00+ 45.00 = 0.00 342.00 2,052.00
136. DOR LAB + Door Installer - labor burden
21 21.00 HR [*] 0.00+ 50.00 = 0.00 210.00 1,260.00
137. PNT LAB + Painter - labor burden
90 90.00 HR [*] 0.00+ 45.00 = 0.00 810.00 4,860.00
Totals: PREVAILING WAGE DIFFERENTIAL 0.00 15,095.00 90,570.00 General

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL
138. TMP TLT + Temporary toilet (per month)
2+1 3.00 MO 0.00+ 242.23 = 0.00 145.34 872.03
139. TMP HWS + Temporary hand washing station (per month) 2+1 3.00 MO 0.00+ 247.00 = 0.00 148.20 889.20
140. FEE DEPUTY + Deputy inspection
8 8.00 HR 0.00+ 135.00 = 0.00 216.00 1,296.00
141. LAB SUPERC + Commercial Supervision / Project Management - per hour 120 120.00 HR [*] 0.00+ 155.25 = 0.00 3,726.00 22,356.00 The general clean-up fees are only associated with keeping the work area in a reasonably clean manner. All issues with final clean-up of the residence are excluded unless notated.
142. CLN LAB + Cleaning Technician - per hour
2*16 32.00 HR 0.00+ 66.61 = 0.00 426.30 2,557.82
143. DMO DTRUCK - Single axle dump truck - per load - including dump fees 1 1.00 EA 395.78+ 0.00 = 0.00 79.16 474.94
144. FEE BONDS + Bond fees
1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 37,026.00 = 0.00 7,405.20 44,431.20
145. FEE TIPF + Taxes, insurance, permits & fees (Bid Item) 1 1.00 EA AS INCURRED
The following line item addresses the final clean up
146. CLN FINALR + Final cleaning - construction - Residential 4860 4860.00 SF 0.00+ 0.44 = 0.00 427.68 2,566.08
PAGE 254 of 341
6 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 16
CONTINUED - General

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL
We will attempt to create a reasonably similar appearance with the existing finishes. In the event that a reasonably similar appearance of materials cannot be achieved it will be addressed separately.

Additional damages discovered due to unforeseen conditions or city building code upgrades will be addressed separately and in writing.

The repair recommendations presented herein are based solely on visual observations made at the time of our site visit. No engineering or destructive testing was performed. If local government agencies require a licensed engineer to review the repair recommendations, then a state licensed engineer should be retained and the above scope of repair may change. The preparation, review, or approval of repair plans is beyond the scope of our estimate. No warranty is made or implied as to future performance of the property based on the repair recommendations. The estimate was prepared in order to assist in the evaluation of an insurance claim. This estimate should not be used by any other parties or for other purposes as it may not contain sufficient information for other than the intended use. The scope of repairs may change based on the notations described in the estimate.

All issues regarding policy coverages are expressly excluded from this estimate and should be addressed by the claim representative.

Totals: General 0.00 12,573.88 75,443.27
Labor Minimums Applied

CAT SEL ACT DESCRIPTION

CALC QTY REMOVE REPLACE TAX O&P TOTAL
147. FNH MN-A + Finish hardware labor minimum
1 1.00 EA 0.00+ 46.17 = 0.00 9.24 55.41
Totals: Labor Minimums Applied 0.00 9.24 55.41
Line Item Totals: CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 7,915.89 84,731.42 508,387.73 Additional Charges Charge
California Lumber Assessment Fee 196.29
Additional Charges Total $196.29
PAGE 255 of 341
Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 17
Grand Total Areas:
4,074.11 SF Walls 2,074.83 SF Ceiling 6,148.94 SF Walls and Ceiling 2,074.83 SF Floor 230.54 SY Flooring 339.50 LF Floor Perimeter

0.00 SF Long Wall 0.00 SF Short Wall 414.33 LF Ceil. Perimeter 2,074.83 Floor Area 2,280.22 Total Area 4,074.11 Interior Wall Area 6,865.14 Exterior Wall Area 272.33 Exterior Perimeter of Walls
4,857.08 Surface Area 48.57 Number of Squares 0.00 Total Perimeter Length 148.17 Total Ridge Length 0.00 Total Hip Length
Coverage Item Total % ACV Total %
Dwelling 506,713.10 99.67% 506,948.65 99.67%
Other Structures 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
Contents 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
Code Upgrades 1,674.63 0.33% 1,674.63 0.33%
Total 508,387.73 100.00% 508,623.28 100.00%
PAGE 256 of 341
8 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 18
Summary for Dwelling
Line Item Total 414,416.02
California Lumber Assessment Fee 196.29
Material Sales Tax 7,844.76
Subtotal 422,457.07
Overhead 42,245.79
Profit 42,245.79
Replacement Cost Value $506,948.65
Net Claim $506,948.65
Ray Boykin
Senior Property Estimator
PAGE 257 of 341
9 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 19
Summary for Code Upgrades
Line Item Total 1,324.40
Material Sales Tax 71.13
Subtotal 1,395.53
Overhead 139.55
Profit 139.55
Replacement Cost Value $1,674.63
Net Claim $1,674.63
Ray Boykin
Senior Property Estimator
PAGE 258 of 341
0 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 20
Recap by Room
Estimate: CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO
Area: OFFICE BLDG
STORAGE RM 1 1,738.81 0.42%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 1,738.81
STORAGE RM 2 3,157.12 0.76%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 3,157.12
Area Subtotal: OFFICE BLDG 4,895.93 1.18%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 4,895.93
Area: OFFICE ROOF
Roof1 25,795.05 6.20%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 25,795.05
Roof2 29,756.33 7.16%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 29,756.33
Roof3 603.61 0.15%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 603.61
Area Subtotal: OFFICE ROOF 56,154.99 13.51%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 56,154.99
Area: MAINTENANCE BLDG
Main Garage 34,021.35 8.18%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 34,021.35
Garage 1 15,074.19 3.63%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 15,074.19
Garage Storage Rm 1,301.39 0.31%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 1,301.39
Area Subtotal: MAINTENANCE BLDG 50,396.93 12.12%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 50,396.93
Area: MAINTENANCE BLDG ROOF
Roof1 28,374.14 6.82%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 28,374.14
Roof2 1,087.98 0.26%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 1,087.98
Area Subtotal: MAINTENANCE BLDG ROOF 29,462.12 7.09%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 29,462.12
PAGE 259 of 341
Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 21
Area: Maintenance Bldg
Front Elevation 8,825.73 2.12%
Coverage: Dwelling 84.99% = 7,501.33
Coverage: Code Upgrades 15.01% = 1,324.40
Rear Elevation 9,060.50 2.18%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 9,060.50
Right Elevation 4,654.27 1.12%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 4,654.27
Left Elevation 4,448.61 1.07%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 4,448.61
Area Subtotal: Maintenance Bldg 26,989.11 6.49%
Coverage: Dwelling 95.09% = 25,664.71
Coverage: Code Upgrades 4.91% = 1,324.40
DEMOLITION 41,552.70 9.99%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 41,552.70
Framing 67,898.08 16.33%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 67,898.08
PREVAILING WAGE DIFFERENTIAL 75,475.00 18.15%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 75,475.00
General 62,869.39 15.12%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 62,869.39
Labor Minimums Applied 46.17 0.01%
Coverage: Dwelling 100.00% = 46.17
Subtotal of Areas 415,740.42 100.00%
Coverage: Dwelling 99.68% = 414,416.02
Coverage: Code Upgrades 0.32% = 1,324.40
Total 415,740.42 100.00%
PAGE 260 of 341
Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 22
Recap by Category
O&P Items Total %
CLEANING 20,588.75 4.05%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 20,588.75
CONCRETE & ASPHALT 2,024.90 0.40%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 2,024.90
CONTENT MANIPULATION 1,043.36 0.21%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 1,043.36
GENERAL DEMOLITION 75,685.48 14.88%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 75,685.48
DOORS 27,902.20 5.49%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 27,902.20
ELECTRICAL 15,597.40 3.07%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 15,597.40
FLOOR COVERING - STONE 7,751.50 1.52%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 7,751.50
PERMITS AND FEES 38,106.00 7.49%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 38,106.00
FINISH CARPENTRY / TRIMWORK 300.00 0.06%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 300.00
FINISH HARDWARE 710.57 0.14%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 710.57
FRAMING & ROUGH CARPENTRY 96,648.18 19.00%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 96,648.18
LABOR ONLY 20,340.00 4.00%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 20,340.00
LIGHT FIXTURES 4,846.32 0.95%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 4,846.32
INTERIOR LATH & PLASTER 2,786.81 0.55%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 2,786.81
PAINTING 17,295.79 3.40%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 17,295.79
ROOFING 76,806.81 15.10%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 76,806.81
SCAFFOLDING 3,520.96 0.69%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 3,520.96
SOFFIT, FASCIA, & GUTTER 2,317.70 0.46%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 42.86% = 993.30
Coverage: Code Upgrades @ 57.14% = 1,324.40
TEMPORARY REPAIRS 1,467.69 0.29%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 1,467.69
O&P Items Subtotal 415,740.42 81.74%
PAGE 261 of 341
3 Tri Tech Restoration
3301 N. San Fernando Blvd.

Burbank, CA 91504
Tel: (818)565-3900
Fax: (818)565-3999
Lic. No. B-501801
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 23
Permits and Fees 196.29 0.04%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 100.00% = 196.29
Material Sales Tax 7,915.89 1.56%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 99.10% = 7,844.76
Coverage: Code Upgrades @ 0.90% = 71.13
Overhead 42,385.34 8.33%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 99.67% = 42,245.79
Coverage: Code Upgrades @ 0.33% = 139.55
Profit 42,385.34 8.33%
Coverage: Dwelling @ 99.67% = 42,245.79
Coverage: Code Upgrades @ 0.33% = 139.55
Total 508,623.28 100.00%
PAGE 262 of 341
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 24

OFFICE BLDG
STORAGE RM 1
STORAGE RM 2

OFFICE BLDG
3' 5'
23' 6"
8'
8' 8"
15'
15' 8"
5' 8"
7' 6"
7' 10"
PAGE 263 of 341
5 CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 25

OFFICE ROOF
Roof1
(A)F1
(B)F2
Roof2
(A)F3 (B)F4
Roof3
F5
Roof1
(A)F1
(B)F2
Roof2
(A)F3 (B)F4
Roof3
F5

OFFICE ROOF
37'
5'
16'
15' 2"
16'
15' 2"
30' 4"
21' 11" 21' 11"
1'
11"
24' 1"
16' 10"
16'
16' 10"
16' 32'
6' 7"
8' 3"7' 2"
PAGE 264 of 341
6 CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 26

MAINTENANCE BLDG
Garage 1
Garage Storage Rm
Main Garage
Garage Rm2
Garage Rm 1

MAINTENANCE BLDG
30'
5'
74'
7' 6"
8' 10"
5' 8"
14'
19' 4"
68' 4"
38' 6" 7' 10"
28' 8"
21' 2"
14' 4"
PAGE 265 of 341
CITY_OF_SAN_MARINO 5/22/2026 Page: 27

MAINTENANCE BLDG ROOF
Roof1
(A)F1(B)F2
Roof2
F3

MAINTENANCE BLDG ROOF
72'
19'
18'
19'
18'
36'
9' 4"
7' 8"6' 7"
PAGE 266 of 341

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
PAGE 267 of 341
J
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Joseph Montes, City Attorney
DATE: June 10, 2026
SUBJECT: REPORT ON EMERGENCY ACTIONS TAKEN TO
REPAIR/REMEDIATE FIRE STATION 91 AND REQUEST TO

EXTEND EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT PURSUANT TO
PUBLIC CONTRACTS CODE SECTION 22050 AND SAN
MARINO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.06.05(A)(8)

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Efficient, Responsive and Effective City Services
Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND
Fire Station 91, San Marino’s sole Fire Station is an essential public safety facility located within the City of San Marino that houses firefighting apparatus, emergency medical equipment, and fire personnel who provide emergency response services to the residents and businesses of the City. The facility is critical to the City's ability to deliver uninterrupted fire suppression and emergency medical response capabilities to the community.

City staff recently discovered that a long-term water leak within the Fire Station has caused significant and extensive water damage to the structure.

The damage includes deterioration of walls, flooring, electrical systems, and other building components critical to the continued safe operation of the fire station.

Upon discovery of the water damage, the City Manager, acting pursuant to the authority delegated under San Marino Municipal Code Section Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
John Chou, Council Member
Hunter Chang, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 268 of 341

04.03.02(A), proclaimed a public emergency in connection with the water damage at the Fire Station and authorized immediate actions to assess, remediate, and repair the damage. Section 02.06.05(A)(8) of the San Marino Municipal Code delegates to the City Manager the power to proclaim a public emergency, as defined in Public Contract Code Section 1102, to immediately take all actions directly required by the emergency, to procure needed goods, services, and public projects, and to contract for public projects without informal or formal bidding.

At the April 24, 2026, City Council meeting, the City Council unanimously approved Resolution No. R-26-08, ratifying the City Manager’s proclamation of emergency and authorizing emergency procurement of construction and other related services to repair/remediate Fire Station 91. That resolution and governing law require that a report on progress be provided at each Council meeting and a decision be made as to whether to extend the emergency proclamation to facilitate continued emergency procurement.

DISCUSSION
Since the Council’s action, staff have been working with the City’s insurer, the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) and their designees to prepare for the remediation and repair work. The following work is currently in various stages of progress:
- Executed and completed an initial contract with ServePro for initial response, assessment, and rental equipment. Final invoice is pending. - Executed and completed a contract with Enviro Check for a variety of biological testing services. Cost for services was $2,590.00. - Executed a contract with Mobile Modular for the rental of temporary office and housing facilities for the Fire Department personnel. The facilities are expected to be delivered to the Civic Center during the week of May 11th. Current cost estimate is $44,245.51.
- Executed a contract with BluSky Restoration Contractors, LLC for remediation work. Current cost estimate is $120,919.68. - Negotiating a scope of work and contract with BluSky Restoration Contractors, LLC for repair work. Costs are unknown at this time. - Negotiating a contract with Griffin Structures for construction management services to oversee the work of BluSky Restoration Contractors, LLC. Current cost estimate is $58,721.
- Coordinating with the City’s Information Technology (IT) servicer SDI to fulfill the various IT needs related to the move out of the Fire Station and into the temporary facilities. Costs are unknown at this time.

PAGE 269 of 341
- Executed a contract with Westnet for fire personnel alerting equipment installation. Current cost estimate is $18,651.06.
- Executed a contract with The Lavatory for additional temporary shower and restroom trailer facilities for fire personnel. Current cost estimate is $9,265.88.

Construction to complete utility connections to the temporary living and office facilities was completed on June 2. On Wednesday, June 3, all fire department personnel moved into the temporary living and office facilities and are now operating out of these units. Demolition work within the fire station is anticipated to begin sometime the week of June 8.

It is unknown at this time whether additional emergency procurements will be required for the restoration work at Fire Station 91, but staff anticipates having a better understanding in that regard as repair activity progresses and undertaking the standard procurement procedures will unnecessarily delay repair and remediation of Fire Station 91. Accordingly, it is recommended that the Council determine that the emergency action approved in Resolution No.

R-26-08 be continued to facilitate expeditious repair and restoration of the Fire Station.

Ongoing Review Requirements
Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22050(c) and San Marino Municipal Code Section 02.06.05(A)(8), the City Council must review the emergency action at each regularly scheduled meeting and determine, by a four-fifths (4/5) vote, whether there is a need to continue the emergency action and whether that work should continue without the benefit of informal or formal bidding. The City Council shall terminate the emergency action at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant so that the remainder of the emergency action may be completed by giving notice for bids to let contracts. Staff will report to the City Council on the status of the emergency project at its next regularly scheduled meeting and at each regular meeting thereafter, as required by the Public Contract Code, until the repairs are completed.

Environmental Analysis
The emergency repairs to Fire Station 91 are categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and Section 15269 (Emergency Projects).

PAGE 270 of 341

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
The full cost of the emergency repair work at Fire Station 91 is not yet known and will depend upon the scope of remediation required once a full assessment of the water damage has been completed. The City Manager will negotiate contracts with qualified contractors and vendors necessary to assess, remediate, and repair the damage. Even though there is no formal bid process required in emergency projects, the City Manager will make reasonable efforts to obtain competitive pricing where feasible and consistent with the urgency of the emergency. All contracts entered into pursuant to the Resolution shall be subject to applicable prevailing wage requirements. Staff will provide the City Council with regular updates on expenditures incurred pursuant to the Resolution at each regularly scheduled meeting.

While the costs of the emergency repair work are unknown at this time, the City anticipates a significant portion to be covered by the City’s property insurance policies with the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority subject to the City’s coverage limits. At a minimum, the City expects to be responsible for the insurance policy’s deductible of $15,000. Expenses not covered by insurance will be paid for out of the City’s General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance (Reserves).

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council receive the report of repair/remediation actions undertaken to date and extend the emergency by a 4/5 vote to facilitate expeditious restoration of Fire Station 91. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
"I move to receive and file the report of repair/remediation actions undertaken to date and to extend the emergency action approved in Resolution No. R-26- 08 to facilitate the expeditious restoration of Fire Station 91."

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. R-26-08
PAGE 271 of 341
PAGE 272 of 341
PAGE 273 of 341
PAGE 274 of 341
PAGE 275 of 341
PAGE 276 of 341

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Hillary Guirola-Leon, Finance Director
DATE: June 10, 2026
SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS REPORT
FOR MAY 2026

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND
The City publishes a report on total disbursements each month pursuant to Government Code Sections 37202 and 37208.

DISCUSSION
There are three source points for disbursement: (1) items disbursed from the City’s General Checking account, including electronic funds transfers (EFTs); (2) items disbursed from the City’s Workers’ Compensation Account (collaboratively managed by City staff and the workers’ compensation Third party administrator); and (3) items disbursed through the payroll process, inclusive of direct deposit transfers to employees, hardcopy checks issued to employees, and electronic transfers to State and Federal taxing authorities.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
Procurement review is not applicable.

Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 277 of 341
Description A m ount
General Account Checks 470,128$
General Account Electronic Fund Transfers 1,342,646
Worker's Compensation Checks 52,219
Salaries and Taxes Paid 1,016,957
2,881,949$
Operating Expenditures 2,760,571$
CIP Expenditures 121,378
2,881,949$
S chedule of Disbursem ents - May 2026
December January February March April May
FY 2025-26 3,201,485 2,807,409 2,106,713 2,180,658 2,318,973 2,760,571 FY 2024-25 2,498,680 3,157,177 1,957,572 2,328,646 2,278,659 3,069,138 Due to CJPIA 2nd payment of
$549,000.

In FY 2025-26 this invoice was
paid in two installments.

Due to timing of
invoice payments.

Due to $70K paid to City of West Covina for Mark
43 maintenance fee, $76K paid to CIty of South
Pasadena for Shared Command invoice, $31K
reissuance check to the Los Angeles County Clerk
for the General Election, and $112K paid to San
Marino School Distri
0 550,000
1,100,000
1,650,000
2,200,000
2,750,000
3,300,000
3,850,000
4,400,000 Operating Expenditures By Month
PAGE 278 of 341

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Council receive and file the Monthly Disbursements Report for the month of May 2026. If the Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to receive and file the Monthly Disbursements Report for the month of May 2026.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. May 2026 Transactions by Account Summary
December January February March April May
FY 2025-26 255,789 151,126 279,261 767,626 18,247 121,378 FY 2024-25 788,031 77,380 1,080,050 3,736,939 1,537,970 190,822 Due to $700K Street
Rehab Project
Payment in FY 24-25
Due to $850K Street
Rehab Project payment,
$99K for Catch Basin
Trash Devices and $56K
to upgrade Irrigation
Due to $2.5M related to Street
Rehab Project and $670K for Lift
Station Improvement Project
Due to $1.4 M related to
the Street Rehab Project
0 250,000
500,000
750,000
1,000,000
1,250,000
1,500,000
1,750,000
2,000,000
2,250,000
2,500,000
2,750,000
3,000,000
3,250,000
3,500,000
3,750,000
4,000,000 CIP Expenditures By Month
PAGE 279 of 341
User:

Printed:

LCarlson
06/01/2026 - 12:15PM
Transactions by Account
Batch: 00000.00.0000
Accounts Payable
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 101-00-1060-0000 Ford of Montebello Credit 22518 -464.28 05/01/2026 101-00-1060-0000 Ford of Montebello Credit 22518 -379.32 05/01/2026 101-00-1060-0000 Ford of Montebello Shocks 22518 379.32 05/01/2026 101-00-1060-0000 Ford of Montebello Jet & Clip 22518 31.17 05/01/2026 101-00-1060-0000 Ford of Montebello Shock Mounting 22518 171.72 05/01/2026 -261.39 Vendor Subtotal:
101-00-1060-0000 Garvey Equipment Company Ignition 0 223.24 05/01/2026 223.24 Vendor Subtotal:
101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Wiper Blades 0 72.96 05/01/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Tire Shine 0 19.87 05/01/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Credit 0 -154.21 05/01/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Credit 0 -22.00 05/01/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Filter & Tie Rods 0 219.32 05/01/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Shocks 0 451.47 05/01/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Credit 0 -454.55 05/01/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Battery 0 271.97 05/01/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Credit 0 -66.00 05/15/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Batteries (2) 0 517.61 05/15/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Filters & Oil 0 725.94 05/15/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Valve Stems 0 3.58 05/29/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Battery & Filters 0 229.77 05/29/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Wiper Blades 0 64.05 05/29/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Coolant 0 46.07 05/29/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Headlight 0 23.62 05/29/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Remote Battery 0 14.35 05/29/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Grease & Filters 0 112.93 05/29/2026 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Trailer Plug 0 23.02 05/29/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 1 PAGE 280 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Battery 0 238.56 05/29/2026 2,338.33 Vendor Subtotal:
101-00-1060-0000 Tire Hub Tires (4) 22626 436.77 05/29/2026 101-00-1060-0000 Tire Hub Tires (6) 22626 844.75 05/29/2026 1,281.52 Vendor Subtotal:
101-01-4376-0000 Office Depot Office Supplies 22530 10.96 05/01/2026 101-01-4376-0000 Office Depot Paper 22571 92.17 05/15/2026 103.13 Vendor Subtotal:
101-06-4106-2755 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service March 2026 0 10,564.50 0000001226 05/29/2026 101-06-4106-2755 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service March 2026 0 3,104.00 0000001226 05/29/2026 101-06-4106-2755 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service March 2026 0 1,504.00 0000001226 05/29/2026 101-06-4106-2755 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service March 2026 0 300.00 0000001226 05/29/2026 101-06-4106-2755 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service March 2026 0 937.50 0000001226 05/29/2026 101-06-4106-2755 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service March 2026 0 369.00 0000001226 05/29/2026 16,779.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-08-4016-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium April 2026 22554 139.20 05/15/2026 101-08-4016-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium April 2026 22591 139.20 05/29/2026 278.40 Vendor Subtotal:
101-08-4016-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium May 2026 22557 742.80 05/15/2026 101-08-4016-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium June 2026 22600 742.80 05/29/2026 1,485.60 Vendor Subtotal:
101-08-4016-0000 PERS (Medical) Retired Premium May 2026 0 12,650.00 05/15/2026 101-08-4016-0000 PERS (Medical) Medical Retiree June 2026 0 11,450.00 05/29/2026 24,100.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-08-4150-0000 PERS (Medical) Admin Fee for Active May 2026 0 160.87 05/15/2026 101-08-4150-0000 PERS (Medical) Admin Fee for Retired May 2026 0 44.76 05/15/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 2 PAGE 281 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 101-08-4150-0000 PERS (Medical) Admin Fee for Retiree June 2026 0 38.42 05/29/2026 101-08-4150-0000 PERS (Medical) Admin Fee for Active June 2026 0 163.90 05/29/2026 407.95 Vendor Subtotal:
101-08-4150-0500 Dell Marketing LP Microsoft 365 Licenses Annual 22513 35,151.60 0000001262 05/01/2026 35,151.60 Vendor Subtotal:
101-08-4150-0500 SDI Presence LLC Managed IT Proofpoint Service March 2026 0 892.50 0000001192 05/01/2026 101-08-4150-0500 SDI Presence LLC Managed IT Service March 2026 0 16,768.83 0000001192 05/01/2026 17,661.33 Vendor Subtotal:
101-08-4150-0500 U.S. Bank Microsoft-GCC Annual Subscription 22550 132.00 05/11/2026 101-08-4150-0500 U.S. Bank Oracle-DNS March 2026 22550 2.26 05/11/2026 134.26 Vendor Subtotal:
101-08-4150-0750 AT&T Mobility Citywide Cellphone Service April 2026 (Non-Uniform) 22503 1,729.25 05/01/2026 101-08-4150-0750 AT&T Mobility Citywide Cellphone Service April 2026 (Uniform) 22502 2,191.99 05/01/2026 101-08-4150-0750 AT&T Mobility Citywide Cellphone Service May 2026 (Uniform) 22596 2,191.99 05/29/2026 101-08-4150-0750 AT&T Mobility Citywide Cellphone Service May 2026 (Non-Uniform) 22597 2,082.99 05/29/2026 8,196.22 Vendor Subtotal:
101-08-4376-0000 AT&T Mobility Hotspot Service April 2026 (Uniform) 22502 60.00 05/01/2026 101-08-4376-0000 AT&T Mobility Hotspot Service April 2026 (Non-Uniform) 22503 100.00 05/01/2026 101-08-4376-0000 AT&T Mobility Hotspot Service May 2026 (Uniform) 22596 60.00 05/29/2026 101-08-4376-0000 AT&T Mobility Hotspot Service May 2026 (Non-Uniform) 22597 100.00 05/29/2026 320.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-08-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service March-April 2026 City Hall 22540 26.77 05/01/2026

26.77 Vendor Subtotal:
101-08-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service March-April 2026 City Hall 22499 1,280.72 05/01/2026 101-08-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service April-May 2026 City Hall 22593 768.80 05/29/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 3 PAGE 282 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 2,049.52 Vendor Subtotal:
101-08-4500-9025 AT&T City Hall Compound Internet Service April 2026 2nd Fl City Hall 22500 293.52 05/01/2026 101-08-4500-9025 AT&T City Hall Compound Internet Service May 2026 2nd Fl City Hall 22594 293.52 05/29/2026 587.04 Vendor Subtotal:
101-09-4010-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium April 2026 22554 9.68 05/15/2026

9.68 Vendor Subtotal:
101-09-4150-0000 Avantpage Inc Chinese Translation Service Agenda 4/24/26 22505 71.50 05/01/2026 101-09-4150-0000 Avantpage Inc Translation Service-Chinese Resident Guide Spring 2026 22599 396.95 05/29/2026 468.45 Vendor Subtotal:
101-09-4150-0000 Ya-Nan Chou Zoom Interpretation Measure S Town Hall Meeting 3/18/26 22508 240.00 05/01/2026 101-09-4150-0000 Ya-Nan Chou Zoom Interpretation Measure S-Chinese Club Meeting 4/1/26 22508 240.00 05/01/2026 480.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-09-4150-0000 Quench USA, Inc Drinking Water Service May 2026 City Hall 22574 51.78 05/15/2026

51.78 Vendor Subtotal:
101-09-4150-0000 U.S. Bank 4 Leaf Print-Lacy Park Entrance Fee Banner 22550 161.16 05/11/2026 101-09-4150-0000 U.S. Bank 4 Leaf Print- Measure S Banners 22550 503.33 05/11/2026 664.49 Vendor Subtotal:
101-09-4150-0500 U.S. Bank Constant Contact-Weekly Briefing Online Software 22550 152.00 05/11/2026 101-09-4150-0500 U.S. Bank Zoom Subscription for City Council Meeting 22550 1,763.79 05/11/2026 1,915.79 Vendor Subtotal:
101-09-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Label Maker Tape 22550 17.71 05/11/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 4 PAGE 283 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No

17.71 Vendor Subtotal:
101-09-4480-0000 U.S. Bank BBK Law-Training A.Walker 22550 50.00 05/11/2026

50.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-10-4010-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium May 2026 22557 -48.20 05/15/2026 -48.20 Vendor Subtotal:
101-10-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co Adjustment Premium June 2026 22612 44.04 05/29/2026

44.04 Vendor Subtotal:
101-10-4106-3415 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service Dec 2025 0 2,437.50 0000001226 05/29/2026 101-10-4106-3415 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service Feb 2026 0 1,506.00 0000001226 05/29/2026 101-10-4106-3415 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service March 2026 0 617.50 0000001226 05/29/2026 101-10-4106-3415 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP Legal Service March 2026 0 2,227.50 0000001226 05/29/2026 6,788.50 Vendor Subtotal:
101-10-4106-3415 Steve A Filarsky, Attorney at Law Legal Service March 2026 0 7,176.00 05/29/2026 101-10-4106-3415 Steve A Filarsky, Attorney at Law Legal Service April 2026 0 2,970.50 05/29/2026 10,146.50 Vendor Subtotal:
101-10-4150-0000 The Counseling Team Intl. Employee Support Service April 2026 0 1,523.66 0000001199 05/01/2026 101-10-4150-0000 The Counseling Team Intl. Employee Support Service May 2026 0 1,523.66 0000001199 05/29/2026 3,047.32 Vendor Subtotal:
101-10-4150-0000 USI Insurance Service National, Inc Group Benefit Fee May 2026 22545 1,250.00 05/01/2026 101-10-4150-0000 USI Insurance Service National, Inc Group Benefit Fee June 2026 22628 1,250.00 05/29/2026 2,500.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-10-4150-0500 U.S. Bank Zoom.com-Subscription HR Dept 22550 133.79 05/11/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 5 PAGE 284 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 133.79 Vendor Subtotal:
101-10-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Ergonomic Chair for HR Analyst 22550 143.65 05/11/2026 101-10-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Folders for New Hire Orientation 22550 83.36 05/11/2026 227.01 Vendor Subtotal:
101-10-4376-0000 Western Graphix Inc ID Card Printer-Ribbon 0 298.77 05/29/2026 298.77 Vendor Subtotal:
101-10-4396-0000 U.S. Bank PSHRA-Membership L.Guerrero 22550 175.00 05/11/2026 175.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-10-4436-0000 Department of Justice Live Scan March 2026 22602 192.00 05/29/2026 192.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-10-4436-0000 Employee Relations Inc Background Check-Account Manager Applicant 22516 169.91 05/01/2026 169.91 Vendor Subtotal:
101-10-4436-0000 St. George's Medical Clinic TB Assessments 22579 350.00 05/15/2026 101-10-4436-0000 St. George's Medical Clinic TB Assessment E.Zepeda 22579 35.00 05/15/2026 101-10-4436-0000 St. George's Medical Clinic Pre-Employment Physical-J.Subadaya 22579 770.00 05/15/2026 1,155.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-10-4436-0000 U.S. Bank Rosemead Donuts-Donuts -JPIA Driver Safety Training 22550 70.38 05/11/2026 101-10-4436-0000 U.S. Bank Corner Bakery-Lunch Interview Panel Library Clerk 22550 29.78 05/11/2026 100.16 Vendor Subtotal:
101-11-4010-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium April 2026 22591 -10.24 05/29/2026 -10.24 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 6 PAGE 285 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 101-11-4010-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium June 2026 22600 48.20 05/29/2026

48.20 Vendor Subtotal:
101-11-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co Adjustment Premium June 2026 22612 -44.04 05/29/2026 -44.04 Vendor Subtotal:
101-11-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Premium June 2026 0 917.91 05/29/2026 917.91 Vendor Subtotal:
101-11-4150-0000 Eide Bailly LLP Government Accounting Consulting March 2026 22559 9,332.68 0000001230 05/15/2026 101-11-4150-0000 Eide Bailly LLP Payroll Accounting Consulting Service 22559 6,825.00 0000001230 05/15/2026 16,157.68 Vendor Subtotal:
101-11-4150-0000 HDL Coren & Cone Contract Service Property Tax April-June 2026 22565 2,020.56 05/15/2026 2,020.56 Vendor Subtotal:
101-11-4150-0000 Lance Soll & Lunghard CPA's LLP Annual Audit Fees-Interim Fieldwork 0 18,690.00 0000001181 05/29/2026 18,690.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-11-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease April 2026-2nd Floor City Hall 0 288.47 0000001206 05/01/2026 101-11-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease May 2026 2nd Fl City Hall 0 288.47 0000001206 05/29/2026 576.94 Vendor Subtotal:
101-11-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Contract Base Rate Charge 3/23/26-4/22/26 City Hall 2nd F 0 164.70 0000001205 05/01/2026 101-11-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Contract Base Rate Charge 4/23/26-5/22/26 CH 2nd Fl 0 164.70 0000001205 05/01/2026 329.40 Vendor Subtotal:
101-11-4468-0000 U.S. Bank LSL CPAS-GASB Update 2026 22550 115.00 05/11/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 7 PAGE 286 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 115.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-14-3106-0000 Nancy Kerckhoff Refund-Tree Permit 1336 Oxford Rd 22492 565.00 05/01/2026 565.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-14-3106-0000 Ping Tan Refund-Tree Permit 1270 Mesa Rd 22493 415.00 05/01/2026 415.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-14-3106-0000 Kuo Chun Refund-Tree Permit 2695 Melville Dr 22495 565.00 05/01/2026 565.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-14-3106-0000 Lulu Chen Refund-Tree Permit 1395 Waverly Dr 22551 565.00 05/15/2026 565.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-14-3106-0000 David Lee Refund-Tree Permit 658 Canterbury Rd 22590 565.00 05/29/2026 565.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-14-3151-0000 Ghazaros Parikan Refund- Building Permit 26-00323 22553 106.03 05/15/2026 106.03 Vendor Subtotal:
101-14-3309-0000 Ridwell, Inc Refund- Business License 22589 97.85 05/29/2026

97.85 Vendor Subtotal:
101-14-4104-6270 The Code Group Inc Over the Counter Plan Check Service April 2026 0 632.50 0000001203 05/15/2026 101-14-4104-6270 The Code Group Inc Fire Inspection Service 3/29/26-4/25/26 0 9,476.18 0000001203 05/15/2026 101-14-4104-6270 The Code Group Inc Fire Plan Check Service April 2026 0 2,846.50 0000001203 05/15/2026 101-14-4104-6270 The Code Group Inc Plan Check Service April 2026 0 25,491.90 0000001203 05/15/2026 38,447.08 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 8 PAGE 287 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 101-14-4150-0000 Harnisch Corporation Contract Consulting Arborist Service April 2026 22564 4,400.00 0000001221 05/15/2026 4,400.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-14-4150-0000 Willdan Financial Service Development Impact Fee Study 3/1/26-4/3/26 22549 5,992.50 0000001247 05/01/2026 5,992.50 Vendor Subtotal:
101-14-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease - April 2026 Stoneman 0 55.98 0000001206 05/01/2026 101-14-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease April 2026 CDD 0 162.03 0000001206 05/01/2026 218.01 Vendor Subtotal:
101-14-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Contract Base Rate Charge 3/17/26-4/16/26 Stoneman 0 28.41 0000001205 05/01/2026 101-14-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Contract Base Rate Charge 4/17/26-5/16/26 Stoneman 0 28.41 0000001205 05/01/2026 101-14-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Contract Base Rate Charge 4/21/26-5/20/26 CDD 0 360.37 0000001205 05/01/2026 101-14-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Contract Base Rate Charge 3/21/26-4/20/26 CDD 0 360.37 0000001205 05/15/2026 777.56 Vendor Subtotal:
101-14-4376-0000 Office Depot Paper 22530 99.54 05/01/2026 101-14-4376-0000 Office Depot Office Supplies 22571 70.93 05/15/2026 170.47 Vendor Subtotal:
101-14-4500-9025 AT&T City Hall Compound Internet Service April 2026 CDD 22500 293.52 05/01/2026 101-14-4500-9025 AT&T City Hall Compound Internet Service May 2026 CDD 22594 293.52 05/29/2026 587.04 Vendor Subtotal:
101-14-4500-9025 AT&T Mobility Hotspot Service April 2026 (Bldg.Inspector) 22503 40.00 05/01/2026 101-14-4500-9025 AT&T Mobility Hotspot Service May 2026 (Bldg.Inspector) 22597 40.00 05/29/2026

80.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-36-4376-0000 AT&T Mobility IPads Service April 2026 (FD) 22502 241.44 05/01/2026 101-36-4376-0000 AT&T Mobility IPad Service May 2026 (FD) 22596 241.44 05/29/2026 482.88 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 9 PAGE 288 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 101-36-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Ralphs-Drinks and Snacks Emergency Prep Workshop 22550 54.48 05/11/2026

54.48 Vendor Subtotal:
101-36-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service March-April 2026 EOC 22499 368.71 05/01/2026 368.71 Vendor Subtotal:
101-36-4500-9025 Charter Communications Cable Service April 4/8/26-5/7/26 EOC 22541 156.43 05/01/2026 156.43 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4010-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium April 2026 22554 10.24 05/15/2026 101-40-4010-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium April 2026 22591 -10.24 05/29/2026

0.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4010-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium May 2026 22557 -48.20 05/15/2026 -48.20 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4010-0000 Humana Insurance Co Adjustment Premium May 2026 22566 -0.90 05/15/2026 -0.90 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co Adjustment Premium May 2026 22567 44.04 05/15/2026 101-40-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co Adjustment Premium June 2026 22612 -44.04 05/29/2026 101-40-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co Adjustment Premium June 2026 22612 44.04 05/29/2026

44.04 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4104-0000 Hartzog & Crabill, Inc On-Call Traffic Engineering Service Speed Winston 22606 290.00 0000001218 05/29/2026 290.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Mat Service 22546 56.98 05/01/2026 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Mat Service 22546 54.48 05/01/2026 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Mat Service 22546 54.48 05/01/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 10 PAGE 289 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Mat Service 22546 54.48 05/01/2026 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Mat Service 22585 54.48 05/15/2026 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Mat Service 22629 54.48 05/29/2026 329.38 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 58.49 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 51.84 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 52.80 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 92.11 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 92.12 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 92.11 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 92.11 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22586 51.84 0000001220 05/15/2026 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22586 92.11 0000001220 05/15/2026 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22630 92.11 0000001220 05/29/2026 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22630 51.84 0000001220 05/29/2026 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22630 92.11 0000001220 05/29/2026 911.59 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4150-0500 PSD Citywide (US) Inc Asset Management Software June 2026-May 2027 0 18,375.00 05/01/2026 18,375.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease- April 2026 PW 0 269.08 0000001206 05/01/2026 101-40-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease- May 2026 PW 0 269.08 0000001206 05/29/2026 538.16 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Contract Base Rate Charge 2/6/26-3/5/26 PW 0 32.67 0000001205 05/01/2026 101-40-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Contracted Copier Usages Charge 2/6/26-5/5/26 PW 0 42.04 0000001205 05/29/2026 101-40-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Contracted Copier Base Rate Charge 5/6/26-6/5/26 PW 0 32.67 0000001205 05/29/2026 101-40-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Contract Base Rate Charge 3/6/26-4/5/26 PW 0 32.67 0000001205 05/29/2026 101-40-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Contract Copier Base Rate Charge 4/6/26-5/5/26 PW 0 32.67 0000001205 05/29/2026 172.72 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4316-0000 Fitness Machine Technicians Gym Maintenance 22604 234.00 05/29/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 11 PAGE 290 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 234.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4376-0000 Primo Brands Drinking Water Service March 2026 PW 22538 83.41 05/01/2026

83.41 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Sky Blue Print-Budget Sheets Copies 22550 24.31 05/11/2026

24.31 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4396-0000 U.S. Bank Pesticide Applicator-Membership B.Macias 22550 170.00 05/11/2026 101-40-4396-0000 U.S. Bank Pesticide Applicator-Membership G.Rivas 22550 170.00 05/11/2026 340.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4468-0000 U.S. Bank Spanglish Kitchen- Lunch Asset Management Training 22550 202.22 05/11/2026 101-40-4468-0000 U.S. Bank Starbuck-Coffee- Asset Management Training 22550 44.00 05/11/2026 246.22 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4480-0000 U.S. Bank Hyatt Monterey- Conference Hotel 3 Nights A.Shah 22550 902.82 05/11/2026 101-40-4480-0000 U.S. Bank EVGO Service- Conference Vehicle Charge A.Shah 22550 31.97 05/11/2026 101-40-4480-0000 U.S. Bank Tesla Charge- Conference Vehicle Charge A.Shah 22550 31.04 05/11/2026 101-40-4480-0000 U.S. Bank Tesla Charge- Conference Vehicle Charge A.Shah 22550 23.17 05/11/2026 989.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4492-0003 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 84.37 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4492-0003 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 84.37 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4492-0003 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 47.48 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4492-0003 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 84.37 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4492-0003 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 53.57 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4492-0003 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 48.35 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4492-0003 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 84.37 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4492-0003 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22586 84.37 0000001220 05/15/2026 101-40-4492-0003 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22586 47.48 0000001220 05/15/2026 101-40-4492-0003 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22630 84.37 0000001220 05/29/2026 101-40-4492-0003 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22630 84.37 0000001220 05/29/2026 101-40-4492-0003 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22630 47.48 0000001220 05/29/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 12 PAGE 291 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 834.95 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4492-0004 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 121.63 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4492-0004 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 68.45 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4492-0004 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 121.62 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4492-0004 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 69.71 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4492-0004 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 121.63 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4492-0004 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 77.23 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4492-0004 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22547 121.63 0000001220 05/01/2026 101-40-4492-0004 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22586 121.63 0000001220 05/15/2026 101-40-4492-0004 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22586 68.45 0000001220 05/15/2026 101-40-4492-0004 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22630 121.63 0000001220 05/29/2026 101-40-4492-0004 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22630 121.63 0000001220 05/29/2026 101-40-4492-0004 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 22630 68.45 0000001220 05/29/2026 1,203.69 Vendor Subtotal:
101-40-4500-9025 AT&T City Hall Compound Internet Service April 2026 PW Admin 22500 185.37 05/01/2026 101-40-4500-9025 AT&T City Hall Compound Internet Service May 2026 PW 22594 185.37 05/29/2026 370.74 Vendor Subtotal:
101-42-4150-0000 Enterprise Fleet Management Fleet Lease May 2026 0 11,201.61 05/29/2026 11,201.61 Vendor Subtotal:
101-42-4150-0000 R & A Tank Technologies LLC Monthly Gas Tank Inspections April 2026 0 175.00 05/01/2026 175.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-42-4376-0000 CA Dept of Tax & Fee Admin Sales Taxes Out of State Purchase Jan-March 2026 22556 39.75 05/15/2026

39.75 Vendor Subtotal:
101-44-4104-0000 John L Hunter Stormwater Engineering Service Jan 2026 22608 523.75 0000001223 05/29/2026 523.75 Vendor Subtotal:
101-44-4150-0000 Cattron Sewer Lift Station Monitor 7/1/25-6/30/26 22507 1,875.00 05/01/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 13 PAGE 292 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 101-44-4150-0000 Cattron Sewer Lift Station Monitor 7/1/24-6/30/25 22507 1,875.00 05/01/2026 101-44-4150-0000 Cattron Sewer Lift Station Monitor 7/1/22-6/30/23 22507 1,875.00 05/01/2026 5,625.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-44-4150-5170 John L Hunter Stormwater Engineering Service Jan 2026 22608 543.25 0000001223 05/29/2026 543.25 Vendor Subtotal:
101-48-4150-0000 L.A. Co. Dept of Public Works Traffic Signal Maintenance March 2026 22524 307.62 05/01/2026 307.62 Vendor Subtotal:
101-48-4150-0000 Yunex LLC Traffic Signal Response Hanging Wires 0 2,450.47 0000001219 05/01/2026 101-48-4150-0000 Yunex LLC Traffic Signal Call Outs March 2026 0 5,109.15 0000001219 05/01/2026 101-48-4150-0000 Yunex LLC Traffic Signal Maintenance 0 1,353.75 0000001219 05/01/2026 101-48-4150-0000 Yunex LLC Traffic Signal Maintenance Service April 2026 0 1,353.75 0000001219 05/29/2026 10,267.12 Vendor Subtotal:
101-48-4150-9020 Nationwide Environmental Service Street Sweeping Service April 2026 22528 5,426.25 0000001191 05/01/2026 101-48-4150-9020 Nationwide Environmental Service Street Sweeping Service May 2026 22569 5,426.25 0000001191 05/15/2026 10,852.50 Vendor Subtotal:
101-48-4376-0000 Granite Construction Company Cold Patch 22520 1,905.26 05/01/2026 1,905.26 Vendor Subtotal:
101-48-4376-0000 Sharpline Solutions, Inc Street Markings Paint 22537 471.21 05/01/2026 471.21 Vendor Subtotal:
101-48-4376-0000 Sprague's Ready Mix Concrete 22622 718.86 05/29/2026 718.86 Vendor Subtotal:
101-48-4376-0000 Underground Service Alert/SC CA State Fee Dig Alert Tickets 0 39.62 05/29/2026 101-48-4376-0000 Underground Service Alert/SC Dig Alert Tickets 0 145.45 05/29/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 14 PAGE 293 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 185.07 Vendor Subtotal:
101-48-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Delong Unlimited Jackets 22550 215.48 05/11/2026 101-48-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Action Barrel Pump 22550 36.54 05/11/2026 101-48-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon- Wrench 22550 8.77 05/11/2026 101-48-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Ralphs-Bottle Water for Staff in Field (Heatwave) 22550 31.96 05/11/2026 292.75 Vendor Subtotal:
101-48-4376-0000 Walters Wholesale Electric Co Balance for Street Light Pole 22548 29.95 05/01/2026 101-48-4376-0000 Walters Wholesale Electric Co Street Supplies 22587 331.69 05/15/2026 361.64 Vendor Subtotal:
101-48-4508-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Car Wash Cleaning 0 26.49 05/29/2026

26.49 Vendor Subtotal:
101-48-4508-0000 Stotz Equipment Street Pads 22623 348.02 05/29/2026 348.02 Vendor Subtotal:
101-50-4376-0000 Garvey Equipment Company Park Supplies 0 137.44 05/01/2026 101-50-4376-0000 Garvey Equipment Company Park Supplies 0 62.63 05/01/2026 101-50-4376-0000 Garvey Equipment Company Park Supplies 0 330.73 05/01/2026 101-50-4376-0000 Garvey Equipment Company Trimmer 0 215.63 05/15/2026 101-50-4376-0000 Garvey Equipment Company Park Supplies 0 143.59 05/29/2026 890.02 Vendor Subtotal:
101-50-4376-0000 JHM Supply Irrigation Supplies 0 86.59 05/01/2026 101-50-4376-0000 JHM Supply Irrigation Supplies 0 105.68 05/01/2026 101-50-4376-0000 JHM Supply Irrigation Supplies 0 87.86 05/01/2026 101-50-4376-0000 JHM Supply Irrigation Supplies 0 67.50 05/15/2026 101-50-4376-0000 JHM Supply Irrigation Supplies 0 925.28 05/15/2026 101-50-4376-0000 JHM Supply Irrigation Supplies 0 5.92 05/15/2026 1,278.83 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 15 PAGE 294 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 101-50-4376-0000 La Verne Power Equipment Inc Repair to Mower 0 1,710.06 05/01/2026 1,710.06 Vendor Subtotal:
101-50-4376-0000 Norman's Nursery Inc Plants for Lacy Park 22570 799.44 05/15/2026 799.44 Vendor Subtotal:
101-50-4376-0000 Plumbing Wholesale Outlet Plumbing Repair-Lacy Park 0 41.08 05/15/2026

41.08 Vendor Subtotal:
101-50-4376-0000 Primo Brands Drinking Water Service March 2026 Lacy Park Office 22538 100.96 05/01/2026 100.96 Vendor Subtotal:
101-50-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Ralph-Drinks for Training 22550 78.64 05/11/2026 101-50-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Park Supplies 22550 19.87 05/11/2026 101-50-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Park Supplies 22550 51.60 05/11/2026 101-50-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Work Gloves 22550 61.39 05/11/2026 101-50-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Antrims Lock-Locks for Lacy Park 22550 79.78 05/11/2026 101-50-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Park Supplies 22550 103.44 05/11/2026 101-50-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Credit 22550 -17.66 05/11/2026 377.06 Vendor Subtotal:
101-50-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service March-April 2026 Lacy Park 22540 26.69 05/01/2026

26.69 Vendor Subtotal:
101-50-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service March-April 2026 Lacy Park 22499 31.91 05/01/2026 101-50-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service April-May 2026 Lacy Park 22593 31.91 05/29/2026

63.82 Vendor Subtotal:
101-50-4500-9025 Charter Communications Internet Service 4/25/26-5/24/26 Lacy Park Office 22584 149.99 05/15/2026 149.99 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 16 PAGE 295 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 101-52-4150-0000 Mariposa Tree Management Inc Tree Maintenance Service March 2026 0 24,814.72 0000001197 05/01/2026 24,814.72 Vendor Subtotal:
101-52-4150-0000 Simply Backflow Inc Backflow Testing- Citywide 22620 3,230.00 05/29/2026 3,230.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-52-4376-0000 Devil Mountain Wholesale Nursery LLCPlants 22603 987.42 05/29/2026 987.42 Vendor Subtotal:
101-52-4376-0000 JHM Supply Irrigation Supplies 0 57.06 05/29/2026 101-52-4376-0000 JHM Supply Irrigation Supplies 0 47.74 05/29/2026 101-52-4376-0000 JHM Supply Irrigation Supplies 0 407.55 05/29/2026 512.35 Vendor Subtotal:
101-52-4500-9460 City of Alhambra Utilities Dept Water Service Jan-March 2026 Grounds 22509 898.06 05/01/2026 898.06 Vendor Subtotal:
101-53-4150-0000 Base Hill, Inc Citywide Janitorial Service April 2026 0 9,064.13 0000001188 05/15/2026 9,064.13 Vendor Subtotal:
101-53-4150-0000 Graycon Inc AC Maintenance March 2026 FD 22521 701.25 05/01/2026 701.25 Vendor Subtotal:
101-53-4150-0000 SDS Security Design Systems Security Alarm Service May 2026 SMCC 22535 148.49 05/01/2026 101-53-4150-0000 SDS Security Design Systems Security Alarm Service May 2026 City Hall 22535 65.00 05/01/2026 101-53-4150-0000 SDS Security Design Systems Security Alarm Service May 2026 FD 22535 117.00 05/01/2026 101-53-4150-0000 SDS Security Design Systems Fire Alarm Service May 2026 City Hall 22535 105.00 05/01/2026 101-53-4150-0000 SDS Security Design Systems Security Alarm Service May 2026 Thurnher 22535 67.00 05/01/2026 101-53-4150-0000 SDS Security Design Systems Fire Alarm Service May 2026 SMCC 22535 150.00 05/01/2026 101-53-4150-0000 SDS Security Design Systems Fire Alarm Service June 2026 SMCC 22618 150.00 05/29/2026 101-53-4150-0000 SDS Security Design Systems Security Alarm Service June 2026 SMCC 22618 148.49 05/29/2026 101-53-4150-0000 SDS Security Design Systems Fire Alarm Service June 2026 City Hall 22618 105.00 05/29/2026 101-53-4150-0000 SDS Security Design Systems Security Alarm Service June 2026 FD 22618 117.00 05/29/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 17 PAGE 296 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 101-53-4150-0000 SDS Security Design Systems Security Alarm Service June 2026 City Hall 22618 65.00 05/29/2026 101-53-4150-0000 SDS Security Design Systems Security Alarm Service June 2026 Thurnher 22618 67.00 05/29/2026 1,304.98 Vendor Subtotal:
101-53-4150-0000 Total Exterminating Inc Additional Extermination PD & FD 0 125.00 05/01/2026 101-53-4150-0000 Total Exterminating Inc Monthly Extermination -City Hall 0 125.00 05/15/2026 101-53-4150-0000 Total Exterminating Inc Monthly Extermination -Library 0 125.00 05/15/2026 101-53-4150-0000 Total Exterminating Inc Quarterly Extermination-FD 0 78.00 05/29/2026 101-53-4150-0000 Total Exterminating Inc Monthly Extermination-Library 0 125.00 05/29/2026 101-53-4150-0000 Total Exterminating Inc Quarterly Extermination-SMCC 0 95.00 05/29/2026 101-53-4150-0000 Total Exterminating Inc Monthly Extermination-SMCC 0 125.00 05/29/2026 101-53-4150-0000 Total Exterminating Inc Quarterly Extermination-Lacy Park Complex 0 200.00 05/29/2026 998.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-53-4206-0000 IMS Refrigeration Inc Ice Machine Maintenance- City Yard 22609 619.39 05/29/2026 619.39 Vendor Subtotal:
101-53-4206-0000 San Marino Plumbing Svc Inc Looking for Water Leak FD 22577 312.00 05/15/2026 101-53-4206-0000 San Marino Plumbing Svc Inc Repair -Water Heater FD 22577 607.79 05/15/2026 919.79 Vendor Subtotal:
101-53-4206-0000 U.S. Bank Guardian Gate-Roanoke Gate Repair 22550 675.00 05/11/2026 101-53-4206-0000 U.S. Bank Guardian Gate-PD Gate Repair 22550 450.00 05/11/2026 101-53-4206-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Wood Shelfs 22550 100.35 05/11/2026 101-53-4206-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Lights FD 22550 500.43 05/11/2026 1,725.78 Vendor Subtotal:
101-53-4376-0000 Aramsco Inc Janitorial Supplies 22498 2,353.77 05/01/2026 101-53-4376-0000 Aramsco Inc Janitorial Supplies 22592 3,265.67 05/29/2026 5,619.44 Vendor Subtotal:
101-53-4376-0000 Otis Elevator Company Fuel Impact Fee Surcharge 22614 175.00 05/29/2026 175.00 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 18 PAGE 297 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 101-53-4376-0000 Veritiv Operating Company Janitorial Supplies 0 274.02 05/01/2026 101-53-4376-0000 Veritiv Operating Company Janitorial Supplies 0 171.26 05/01/2026 445.28 Vendor Subtotal:
101-59-4150-0000 The Sauce Creative Service Corp Community Service Guide-Design Summer 22583 4,200.00 0000001252 05/15/2026 4,200.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-59-4376-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Toner for Big Printer 0 224.77 05/01/2026 224.77 Vendor Subtotal:
101-59-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Epson- Projector Lamp 22550 83.41 05/11/2026

83.41 Vendor Subtotal:
101-59-4396-0000 MMASC Membership 5/15/26-5/15/27 K.Shigenaga 22527 125.00 05/01/2026 125.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-59-4412-0000 The Sauce Creative Service Corp Community Service Guide- Postage Summer 22583 1,940.53 0000001252 05/15/2026 1,940.53 Vendor Subtotal:
101-59-4420-0000 The Sauce Creative Service Corp Community Service Guide-Printing Summer 22583 6,811.38 0000001252 05/15/2026 6,811.38 Vendor Subtotal:
101-59-4468-0000 U.S. Bank LA County Education-Training T.Torres 22550 88.00 05/11/2026 101-59-4468-0000 U.S. Bank LA County Education-Training T.Torres 22550 88.00 05/11/2026 176.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-59-4492-0000 CA Dept of Tax & Fee Admin Sales Taxes Out of State Purchase Jan-March 2026 22556 31.25 05/15/2026

31.25 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 19 PAGE 298 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 101-60-3342-0000 Annette Martin Refund- Voice Class Spring 2026 22494 -28.00 05/01/2026 -28.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-60-3502-0000 Annette Martin Refund- Voice Class Spring 2026 22494 10.00 05/01/2026

10.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-60-4150-0000 Primo Brands Drinking Water Service March 2026 Stoneman 22538 44.17 05/01/2026

44.17 Vendor Subtotal:
101-60-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease-April 2026 SMCC 0 148.45 0000001206 05/01/2026 101-60-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease-April 2026 Stoneman 0 55.97 0000001206 05/01/2026 101-60-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease May 2026 SMCC 0 148.45 0000001206 05/29/2026 352.87 Vendor Subtotal:
101-60-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Contract Base Rate Charge 4/17/26-5/16/26 Stoneman 0 28.41 0000001205 05/01/2026 101-60-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Contract Base Rate Charge 3/17/26-4/16/26 Stoneman 0 28.41 0000001205 05/01/2026 101-60-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Contract Base Rate Charge 4/11/26-5/10/26 SMCC 0 251.23 0000001205 05/01/2026 101-60-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Contracted Copier Base Rate Charge 5/11/26-6/10/26 SMCC 0 251.23 0000001205 05/29/2026 559.28 Vendor Subtotal:
101-60-4376-0000 Office Depot Office Supplies & Paper 22530 102.53 05/01/2026 101-60-4376-0000 Office Depot Office Supplies 22530 61.89 05/01/2026 164.42 Vendor Subtotal:
101-60-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Laptop Bag 22550 35.01 05/11/2026 101-60-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Grommet Tool 22550 10.96 05/11/2026

45.97 Vendor Subtotal:
101-60-4420-0000 U.S. Bank LCM-News Camp Lacy AD 22550 625.00 05/11/2026 625.00 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 20 PAGE 299 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 101-62-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Lil' Playmates Craft Supplies 22550 26.25 05/11/2026 101-62-4376-0000 U.S. Bank OTC-Lil' Learners Craft Supplies 22550 54.80 05/11/2026 101-62-4376-0000 U.S. Bank OTC-Lil' Learners Craft Supplies 22550 21.94 05/11/2026 101-62-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Lil' Playmates Craft Supplies 22550 12.61 05/11/2026 101-62-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Lil' Playmates Craft Supplies 22550 15.35 05/11/2026 130.95 Vendor Subtotal:
101-62-4486-0000 U.S. Bank Round 1-Freewheelers Field trip 22550 367.09 05/11/2026 101-62-4486-0000 U.S. Bank Medieval Times-Deposit Camp Lacy Field Trip 22550 465.40 05/11/2026 832.49 Vendor Subtotal:
101-64-3336-0000 Annette Martin Refund- Voice Class Spring 2026 22494 130.00 05/01/2026 130.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-64-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Senior Connection Craft 22550 20.84 05/11/2026

20.84 Vendor Subtotal:
101-64-4486-0000 Gold Coast Tours Senior Trip 4/30/26 22563 2,574.00 05/15/2026 2,574.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-66-4150-0000 Linda Vogel Hargrove Family Night Petting Zoo 5/8/26 22515 875.00 05/01/2026 875.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-66-4150-0000 Ross Miller Sound for Memorial Event 5/25/26 0 700.00 05/29/2026 700.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-66-4150-0000 Catherine Ryan Trumpet-Memorial Day Event 5/25/26 22575 500.00 05/15/2026 500.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-66-4150-0000 Swank Motion Pictures Inc Movie for Camp Out Program 6/19/26 22581 815.00 05/15/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 21 PAGE 300 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 815.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-66-4150-0000 U.S. Bank Starlink-Internet-Subscription 22550 5.00 05/11/2026 101-66-4150-0000 U.S. Bank LA County Health Dept-Egg Hunt Permit 22550 637.85 05/11/2026 101-66-4150-0000 U.S. Bank Extra Fun Jumpers-Inflatable Slide Family Night 22550 50.00 05/11/2026 692.85 Vendor Subtotal:
101-66-4308-0000 Arcadia Party Rentals Inc Chairs for Memorial Day Event 22555 1,000.00 05/15/2026 1,000.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-66-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Dollar Tree -Egg Hunt Bunny Photo Backdrop 22550 6.63 05/11/2026 101-66-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Egg Hunt Bunny Photo Backdrop 22550 109.72 05/11/2026 101-66-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Egg Hunt Game Prizes 22550 344.25 05/11/2026 101-66-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Family Night Craft Supplies 22550 75.72 05/11/2026 101-66-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Dominos-Track Meet Staff Dinner 22550 187.58 05/11/2026 101-66-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Egg Hunt Bunny Photo Backdrop 22550 75.50 05/11/2026 799.40 Vendor Subtotal:
101-68-4102-0000 Brit-West Soccer Contracted Classes-Spring 2026 Soccer 0 1,680.00 0000001241 05/29/2026 1,680.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-68-4102-0000 Chess Masters Inc Contracted Classes-Spring 2026 Chess 0 1,545.60 05/29/2026 1,545.60 Vendor Subtotal:
101-68-4102-0000 DanceFit, LLC Contracted Classes-Spring 2026 Dance 0 1,617.00 05/29/2026 1,617.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-68-4102-0000 IO Fitness Inc Contracted Classes-Spring 2026 Balance 0 453.60 05/29/2026 453.60 Vendor Subtotal:
101-68-4102-0000 Lango Foothills LLC Contracted Classes-Spring 2026 Spanish 0 1,218.00 05/29/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 22 PAGE 301 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 1,218.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-68-4102-0000 Michael Naishtut Contracted Classes-Spring 2026- Drumming 22613 961.20 05/29/2026 961.20 Vendor Subtotal:
101-68-4102-0000 Payke Gymnastics Contracted Classes-Spring 2026-Gymnastic 22616 739.20 0000001243 05/29/2026 739.20 Vendor Subtotal:
101-68-4102-0000 San Marino Music Center Contracted Classes-Spring 2026 Music 22617 660.00 05/29/2026 660.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-68-4102-0000 Skyhawks Sports Contract Classes -Spring 2026 Youth Sports 22621 5,696.40 0000001242 05/29/2026 5,696.40 Vendor Subtotal:
101-68-4102-0000 Village Fitness + Physical Therapy Contracted Classes-Spring 2026 Balance Class Wed 22631 800.00 05/29/2026 101-68-4102-0000 Village Fitness + Physical Therapy Contracted Classes-Spring 2026 Balance Class 22631 819.00 05/29/2026 1,619.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-68-4102-0000 Yiren Wang Contracted Classes-Spring 2026-Zumba 0 1,680.00 05/29/2026 1,680.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-68-4102-0000 Lauren Weaver Contracted Classes- Spring 2026- Yoga Friday 22632 800.00 05/29/2026 101-68-4102-0000 Lauren Weaver Contracted Classes- Spring 2026- Yoga 22632 1,554.00 05/29/2026 2,354.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-68-4102-0000 Bi Dan Yu Contracted Classes-Spring 2026- Art 0 1,191.00 05/29/2026 1,191.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-70-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Gatehouse Printer 22550 189.86 05/11/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 23 PAGE 302 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 189.86 Vendor Subtotal:
101-70-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service March-April 2026 SMEC 22582 45.36 05/15/2026 101-70-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service March-April 2026 Stoneman 22582 17.18 05/15/2026

62.54 Vendor Subtotal:
101-70-4500-9025 Charter Communications Cable Internet Service April 2026 Stoneman 22541 350.00 05/01/2026 101-70-4500-9025 Charter Communications Cable Internet Service May 2026 Stoneman 22625 350.00 05/29/2026 700.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-90-4150-0000 Quench USA, Inc Drinking Water Service May 2026 Library 22574 54.51 05/15/2026 101-90-4150-0000 Quench USA, Inc Drinking Water Service April 2026 Library 22574 54.51 05/15/2026 109.02 Vendor Subtotal:
101-90-4150-0500 U.S. Bank SQSP-Passport Appointment Scheduling Software 22550 192.00 05/11/2026 192.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-90-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease April 2026-Library 0 696.82 0000001206 05/01/2026 696.82 Vendor Subtotal:
101-90-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Contract Base Rate Charge 4/13/26-5/12/26 Library 0 323.50 0000001205 05/01/2026 101-90-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Contract Base Rate Charge 3/13/26-4/12/26 Library 0 323.50 0000001205 05/15/2026 647.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-90-4376-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Shipping on Toners 0 13.81 05/01/2026

13.81 Vendor Subtotal:
101-90-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Blade Disposal Container 22550 7.29 05/11/2026 101-90-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Canva-Business Cards Library Staff 22550 32.93 05/11/2026 101-90-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Pencil Sharpener 22550 38.40 05/11/2026 101-90-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Walkie Talkies 22550 126.21 05/11/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 24 PAGE 303 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 101-90-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Receipt Printer Paper 22550 29.51 05/11/2026 101-90-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Chair Mats 22550 54.86 05/11/2026 101-90-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Esvata-Office Shade Deposit for CSD Office 22550 412.50 05/11/2026 101-90-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Paper Clips 22550 11.51 05/11/2026 101-90-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Batteries 22550 15.06 05/11/2026 101-90-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Dusters 22550 54.41 05/11/2026 101-90-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Hand Sanitizer 22550 232.40 05/11/2026 1,015.08 Vendor Subtotal:
101-90-4412-0000 U.S. Bank USPS-Postage 22550 33.25 05/11/2026 101-90-4412-0000 U.S. Bank USPS-Postage 22550 33.25 05/11/2026 101-90-4412-0000 U.S. Bank USPS-Postage 22550 33.25 05/11/2026 101-90-4412-0000 U.S. Bank USPS-Postage 22550 317.65 05/11/2026 417.40 Vendor Subtotal:
101-90-4420-0000 LC - M News Inc Summer Reading Club AD 22615 625.00 05/29/2026 625.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-90-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service March-April 2026 Library 22540 39.07 05/01/2026

39.07 Vendor Subtotal:
101-90-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service March-April 2026 Library 22499 140.54 05/01/2026 140.54 Vendor Subtotal:
101-90-4500-9025 Charter Communications Internet Service 3/2/26-4/1/26 Library 22584 154.00 05/15/2026 101-90-4500-9025 Charter Communications Internet Service 5/2/26-6/1/26 Library 22584 154.00 05/15/2026 308.00 Vendor Subtotal:
101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 0 1,303.27 0000001210 05/01/2026 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 0 284.11 0000001210 05/01/2026 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 0 221.65 0000001210 05/01/2026 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 0 32.05 0000001210 05/01/2026 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 0 97.85 0000001210 05/15/2026 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 0 192.69 0000001210 05/15/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 25 PAGE 304 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Credit 0 -10.69 0000001210 05/15/2026 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 0 808.42 0000001210 05/15/2026 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 0 172.29 0000001210 05/15/2026 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 0 814.70 0000001210 05/29/2026 101-91-4370-0335 Ingram Library Services Books 0 497.71 0000001210 05/29/2026 4,414.05 Vendor Subtotal:
101-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 99.83 0000001210 05/01/2026 101-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 46.08 0000001210 05/15/2026 101-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 15.55 0000001210 05/15/2026 101-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 551.05 0000001210 05/15/2026 712.51 Vendor Subtotal:
101-93-4376-0000 Demco Inc Processing Supplies 0 540.68 05/15/2026 540.68 Vendor Subtotal:
101-93-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Barcode Scanners 22550 280.92 05/11/2026 101-93-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Processing Supply 22550 103.56 05/11/2026 101-93-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Rubber Stamp-Processing Supply 22550 20.51 05/11/2026 404.99 Vendor Subtotal:

Subtotal for Fund: 101 416,182.17
102-00-2010-0000 CA State Disbursement Unit PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Earnings Withholding Order 0 487.58 04/24/2026 102-00-2010-0000 CA State Disbursement Unit PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Earnings Withholding Order 0 487.58 05/08/2026 102-00-2010-0000 CA State Disbursement Unit PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Earnings Withholding Order 0 487.58 05/22/2026 1,462.74 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2010-0000 State Franchise Tax Board PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Earnings Withholding Order 22536 100.00 04/24/2026 102-00-2010-0000 State Franchise Tax Board PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Earnings Withholding Order 22576 100.00 05/08/2026 102-00-2010-0000 State Franchise Tax Board PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Earnings Withholding Order 22619 100.00 05/22/2026 300.00 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 26 PAGE 305 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.04.2026 Critical Illness 0 53.89 04/10/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.04.2026 Cancer Insurance-After Tax 0 80.00 04/10/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.04.2026 Accident Insurance-After Tax 0 43.37 04/10/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.04.2026 Life Insurance-After Tax 0 1,331.19 04/10/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.04.2026 Disability STD-After Tax 0 1,081.36 04/10/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.04.2026 Cancer Insurance-Before Tax 0 238.11 04/10/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.04.2026 Group Hospt Indeminity Pre Tax 0 15.56 04/10/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.04.2026 Accident Insurance-Before Tax 0 482.00 04/10/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Accident Insurance-Before Tax 0 461.10 04/24/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Cancer Insurance-Before Tax 0 238.11 04/24/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Disability STD-After Tax 0 1,044.46 04/24/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Cancer Insurance-After Tax 0 80.00 04/24/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Life Insurance-After Tax 0 1,286.69 04/24/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Critical Illness 0 53.89 04/24/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Accident Insurance-After Tax 0 43.37 04/24/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Group Hospt Indeminity Pre Tax 0 15.56 04/24/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Group Hospt Indeminity Pre Tax 0 15.56 05/08/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Life Insurance-After Tax 0 1,286.69 05/08/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Disability STD-After Tax 0 1,044.46 05/08/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Cancer Insurance-After Tax 0 80.00 05/08/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Cancer Insurance-Before Tax 0 238.11 05/08/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Accident Insurance-After Tax 0 43.37 05/08/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Accident Insurance-Before Tax 0 461.10 05/08/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Critical Illness 0 53.89 05/08/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Cancer Insurance-After Tax 0 80.00 05/22/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Critical Illness 0 53.89 05/22/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Disability STD-After Tax 0 1,044.46 05/22/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Accident Insurance-Before Tax 0 461.10 05/22/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Life Insurance-After Tax 0 1,286.69 05/22/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Cancer Insurance-Before Tax 0 238.11 05/22/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Accident Insurance-After Tax 0 43.37 05/22/2026 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Group Hospt Indeminity Pre Tax 0 15.56 05/22/2026 12,995.02 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2011-0000 Texas Life Insurance Company PR Batch 00701.04.2026 Texas Life After 22539 380.25 04/10/2026 102-00-2011-0000 Texas Life Insurance Company PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Texas Life After 2 22539 380.15 04/24/2026 102-00-2011-0000 Texas Life Insurance Company PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Texas Life After 22624 380.25 05/08/2026 102-00-2011-0000 Texas Life Insurance Company PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Texas Life After 2 22624 380.15 05/22/2026 1,520.80 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 27 PAGE 306 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 102-00-2011-0000 Transamerica Life Insurance PR Batch 00701.04.2026 Life Insurance-Transamerica 22542 27.03 04/10/2026 102-00-2011-0000 Transamerica Life Insurance PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Life Insurance-Transamerica 22542 27.03 04/24/2026 102-00-2011-0000 Transamerica Life Insurance PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Life Insurance-Transamerica 22627 27.03 05/08/2026 102-00-2011-0000 Transamerica Life Insurance PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Life Insurance-Transamerica 22627 27.03 05/22/2026 108.12 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2012-3080 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Deferred Comp-City Manager 0 535.52 04/24/2026 102-00-2012-3080 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Deferred Comp-City Manager 0 535.52 05/08/2026 102-00-2012-3080 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Deferred Comp-City Manager 0 535.52 05/22/2026 1,606.56 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Deferred Comp 0 217.32 04/24/2026 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Deferred Comp-Loan Payback 0 1,624.26 04/24/2026 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Deferred Comp Benefit 0 6,000.00 04/24/2026 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Deferred Comp-Loan Payback 0 438.67 04/24/2026 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Deferred Comp-Loan Payback 0 722.85 04/24/2026 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Deferred Comp 0 19,477.96 04/24/2026 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Deferred Comp 0 19,665.46 05/08/2026 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Deferred Comp-Loan Payback 0 1,624.26 05/08/2026 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Deferred Comp-Loan Payback 0 770.12 05/08/2026 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Deferred Comp-Loan Payback 0 438.67 05/08/2026 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Deferred Comp 0 217.32 05/08/2026 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Deferred Comp-Loan Payback 0 1,624.26 05/22/2026 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Deferred Comp-Loan Payback 0 770.12 05/22/2026 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Deferred Comp-Loan Payback 0 438.67 05/22/2026 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Deferred Comp 0 217.32 05/22/2026 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Deferred Comp Benefit 0 6,650.00 05/22/2026 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Deferred Comp 0 19,865.46 05/22/2026 80,762.72 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2012-6050 U.S. Bank PR Batch 00701.05.2026 PARS Employer Portion 0 990.56 05/08/2026 102-00-2012-6050 U.S. Bank PR Batch 00701.05.2026 PARS Employee Portion 0 990.56 05/08/2026 102-00-2012-6050 U.S. Bank PR Batch 00702.05.2026 PARS Employee Portion 0 1,036.39 05/22/2026 102-00-2012-6050 U.S. Bank PR Batch 00702.05.2026 PARS Employer Portion 0 1,036.39 05/22/2026 4,053.90 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00702.04.2026 PERS Survivor Benefit 0 103.23 04/24/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 28 PAGE 307 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00702.04.2026 PERS Employee Paid (Part-Time) 0 934.30 04/24/2026 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00702.04.2026 PERS Employer Share 0 70,591.58 04/24/2026 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00702.04.2026 PERS Employee Paid (Full Time) 0 44,820.72 04/24/2026 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00701.05.2026 PERS Employee Paid (Full Time) 0 45,610.17 05/08/2026 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00701.05.2026 PERS Employer Share 0 71,639.80 05/08/2026 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00701.05.2026 PERS Survivor Benefit 0 105.09 05/08/2026 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00701.05.2026 PERS Employee Paid (Part-Time) 0 1,014.60 05/08/2026 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00702.05.2026 PERS Employee Paid (Full Time) 0 45,836.08 05/22/2026 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00702.05.2026 PERS Employee Paid (Part-Time) 0 1,013.63 05/22/2026 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00702.05.2026 PERS Survivor Benefit 0 105.09 05/22/2026 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00702.05.2026 PERS Employer Share 0 71,792.30 05/22/2026 353,566.59 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2012-7030 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Retirement Health Savings Plan 0 632.04 04/24/2026 102-00-2012-7030 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Retirement Health Savings Plan 0 632.04 05/08/2026 1,264.08 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2012-7031 IAFF-MERP PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Medical Expense Reimb Plan 0 2,250.00 04/24/2026 102-00-2012-7031 IAFF-MERP PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Medical Expense Reimb Plan 0 2,250.00 05/08/2026 102-00-2012-7031 IAFF-MERP PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Medical Expense Reimb Plan 0 2,250.00 05/22/2026 6,750.00 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2014-0000 Humana Insurance Co PR Batch 00701.04.2026 Life Optional 22566 603.20 04/10/2026 102-00-2014-0000 Humana Insurance Co PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Life Optional 2 22566 239.99 04/24/2026 102-00-2014-0000 Humana Insurance Co PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Life Optional 22566 362.31 04/24/2026 102-00-2014-0000 Humana Insurance Co PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Life Optional 22607 602.30 05/08/2026 102-00-2014-0000 Humana Insurance Co PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Life Optional 2 22607 239.99 05/22/2026 102-00-2014-0000 Humana Insurance Co PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Life Optional 22607 362.31 05/22/2026 2,410.10 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2014-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Basic Life Insurance 22567 519.15 04/24/2026 102-00-2014-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Basic Life Insurance 22612 535.05 05/22/2026 1,054.20 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2015-0000 CA Law Enforcement Assn PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Police Dept LTD/125 Plan 22506 800.00 04/24/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 29 PAGE 308 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 800.00 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2015-0000 H. Wilson Insurancenter Inc PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Fire Dept LTD/125 Plan 0 570.00 04/24/2026 102-00-2015-0000 H. Wilson Insurancenter Inc PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Fire Dept LTD/125 Plan 0 570.00 05/22/2026 1,140.00 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2015-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Short Term Disability 22567 884.52 04/24/2026 102-00-2015-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Long Term Disability 22567 1,207.44 04/24/2026 102-00-2015-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Long Term Disability 22612 1,252.16 05/22/2026 102-00-2015-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Short Term Disability 22612 917.28 05/22/2026 4,261.40 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2015-0000 Mutual of Omaha PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Short Term Disability 22568 445.78 04/24/2026 445.78 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.04.2026 PERS Platinum (Choice) 0 54,408.82 04/24/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.04.2026 SHARP 0 2,382.12 04/24/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.04.2026 UnitedHealthCare Harmony 0 3,062.04 04/24/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.04.2026 PERS Gold (Select) 0 3,456.11 04/24/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Kaiser Permanente 0 72,339.59 04/24/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Peace Officers Res. Assoc. CA 0 2,708.00 04/24/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Blue Shield Access + 0 9,913.44 04/24/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Anthem Blue Cross Select 0 9,819.34 04/24/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Blue Shield Trio* 0 2,216.66 04/24/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Anthem Blue Cross Traditional 0 37,918.63 04/24/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.05.2026 SHARP 0 2,382.12 05/22/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.05.2026 PERS Platinum (Choice) 0 54,408.82 05/22/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Blue Shield Access + 0 10,831.35 05/22/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Blue Shield Trio* 0 3,069.22 05/22/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Anthem Blue Cross Traditional 0 37,918.63 05/22/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Anthem Blue Cross Select 0 9,819.34 05/22/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Peace Officers Res. Assoc. CA 0 2,708.00 05/22/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.05.2026 PERS Gold (Select) 0 3,456.11 05/22/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.05.2026 UnitedHealthCare Harmony 0 2,296.53 05/22/2026 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Kaiser Permanente 0 74,277.69 05/22/2026 399,392.56 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 30 PAGE 309 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 102-00-2017-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Ameritas - VSP Choice Network 22554 1,820.32 04/24/2026 102-00-2017-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Ameritas - VSP Choice Network 22591 1,850.48 05/22/2026 3,670.80 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2020-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium April 2026 22554 30.16 05/15/2026 102-00-2020-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium April 2026 22591 30.16 05/29/2026

60.32 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2020-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium May 2026 22557 874.10 05/15/2026 102-00-2020-0000 Delta Dental of California PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Delta Dental PPO 22557 8,569.11 04/24/2026 102-00-2020-0000 Delta Dental of California PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Delta Dental PPO 22600 8,706.76 05/22/2026 102-00-2020-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium June 2026 22600 874.10 05/29/2026 19,024.07 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2020-0000 Delta Dental Insurance Company Adjustment Premium May 2026 22558 41.91 05/15/2026 102-00-2020-0000 Delta Dental Insurance Company PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Delta Dental DeltaCare USA HMO 22558 354.49 04/24/2026 102-00-2020-0000 Delta Dental Insurance Company PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Delta Dental DeltaCare USA HMO 22601 354.49 05/22/2026 102-00-2020-0000 Delta Dental Insurance Company Adjustment Premium June 2026 22601 41.91 05/29/2026 792.80 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2024-2530 San Marino Firefighters Assn PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Firefighter Dues 0 1,005.72 05/08/2026 102-00-2024-2530 San Marino Firefighters Assn PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Firefighter Dues 0 1,005.72 05/22/2026 2,011.44 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2024-2750 San Marino City Employees Assn PR Batch 00701.05.2026 San Marino City Employee Assn 0 450.00 05/08/2026 102-00-2024-2750 San Marino City Employees Assn PR Batch 00702.05.2026 San Marino City Employee Assn 0 450.00 05/22/2026 900.00 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2024-2850 San Marino Supervisory Employee Association PR Batch 00701.05.2026 SM Supervisory Employees Dues 0 180.00 05/08/2026 102-00-2024-2850 San Marino Supervisory Employee Association PR Batch 00702.05.2026 SM Supervisory Employees Dues 0 195.00 05/22/2026 375.00 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 31 PAGE 310 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 102-00-2024-6490 San Marino Police Officers Asn PR Batch 00701.05.2026 San Marino PD Assn 0 868.24 05/08/2026 102-00-2024-6490 San Marino Police Officers Asn PR Batch 00702.05.2026 San Marino PD Assn 0 903.24 05/22/2026 1,771.48 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2028-0000 LegalShield PR Batch 00701.04.2026 Prepaid Legal Services 0 40.38 04/10/2026 102-00-2028-0000 LegalShield PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Prepaid Legal Services 2 0 7.97 04/24/2026 102-00-2028-0000 LegalShield PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Prepaid Legal Services 0 32.40 04/24/2026 102-00-2028-0000 LegalShield PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Prepaid Legal Services 0 40.38 05/08/2026 102-00-2028-0000 LegalShield PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Prepaid Legal Services 2 0 7.97 05/22/2026 102-00-2028-0000 LegalShield PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Prepaid Legal Services 0 32.40 05/22/2026 102-00-2028-0000 LegalShield Adjustment Premium May 2026 0 20.95 05/29/2026 182.45 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2032-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.04.2026 Dep Care/125 Plan 0 937.50 04/10/2026 102-00-2032-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Dep Care/125 Plan 0 937.50 04/24/2026 102-00-2032-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Dep Care/125 Plan 0 937.50 05/08/2026 102-00-2032-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Dep Care/125 Plan 0 937.50 05/22/2026 3,750.00 Vendor Subtotal:
102-00-2036-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.04.2026 Flexible Spending Plan 0 1,201.65 04/10/2026 102-00-2036-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.04.2026 Flexible Spending Plan 0 1,201.65 04/24/2026 102-00-2036-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00701.05.2026 Flexible Spending Plan 0 1,201.65 05/08/2026 102-00-2036-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.05.2026 Flexible Spending Plan 0 1,201.65 05/22/2026 102-00-2036-0000 American Fidelity Assurance Adjustment Premium May 2026 0 275.00 05/29/2026 5,081.60 Vendor Subtotal:

Subtotal for Fund: 102 911,514.53
103-30-3331-3550 Department of Justice Live Scan March 2026 22602 1,178.00 05/29/2026 1,178.00 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4010-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium April 2026 22591 -10.24 05/29/2026 103-30-4010-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium April 2026 22591 -19.92 05/29/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 32 PAGE 311 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No -30.16 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4010-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium June 2026 22600 48.20 05/29/2026 103-30-4010-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium June 2026 22600 -41.25 05/29/2026 103-30-4010-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium June 2026 22600 48.20 05/29/2026

55.15 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co Adjustment Premium June 2026 22612 -5.30 05/29/2026 103-30-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co Adjustment Premium June 2026 22612 -44.04 05/29/2026 -49.34 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Premium June 2026 0 852.56 05/29/2026 103-30-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Premium June 2026 0 1,938.10 05/29/2026 2,790.66 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4150-0000 City of Pasadena Inmate Housing Fees March 2026 22510 896.00 0000001215 05/01/2026 896.00 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4150-0000 Dr. Detail P.H,D Patrol Wash Vehicles March 2026 0 1,140.00 05/15/2026 1,140.00 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4150-0000 Pasadena Humane Society Animal Control Service April 2026 0 7,817.31 0000001211 05/15/2026 7,817.31 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4150-0000 Phoenix Group Information Systems Citations Processing Service March 2026 0 1,374.98 05/15/2026 1,374.98 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4150-0000 Superior Court of California County of LA Revenue Distribution County Fee March 2026 22580 890.00 05/15/2026 890.00 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 33 PAGE 312 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 103-30-4150-0000 U.S. Bank Biometrics4all-Live Scan Maintenance 22550 722.40 05/11/2026 722.40 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4150-0000 Vital Medical Service, LLC Warrant Blood Collection Oct 2025 0 1,082.00 05/01/2026 103-30-4150-0000 Vital Medical Service, LLC Medical Clearance Pre/Post Booking Oct 2025 0 736.00 05/01/2026 103-30-4150-0000 Vital Medical Service, LLC Warrant Blood Collection Sept 2025 0 694.00 05/01/2026 2,512.00 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4150-0500 AT&T Mobility E-Citations Writer Mobile Service April 2026 22504 202.12 05/01/2026 103-30-4150-0500 AT&T Mobility E-Citation Writer May 2026 22598 202.12 05/29/2026 404.24 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4150-0500 U.S. Bank Apple.com-ICloud Storage PD 22550 0.99 05/11/2026

0.99 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4206-0000 Veritiv Operating Company Credit 0 -60.48 05/01/2026 -60.48 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4316-0000 CA Dept of Tax & Fee Admin Sales Taxes Out of State Purchase Jan-March 2026 22556 222.75 05/15/2026 222.75 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease- April 2026 PD 0 200.26 0000001206 05/01/2026 200.26 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Contract Base Rate Charge 3/6/26-4/5/26 PD 0 227.08 0000001205 05/01/2026 103-30-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Contract Base Rate Charge 4/6/26-5/5/26 PD 0 227.08 0000001205 05/15/2026 103-30-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Contract Base Rate Charge 2/6/26-3/5/26 PD 0 227.08 0000001205 05/15/2026 681.24 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4316-0000 FARO Technologies, Inc Faro Scene & Zone 3 D 3yr Subscription 0 12,350.00 05/29/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 34 PAGE 313 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 12,350.00 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4316-0000 U.S. Bank Bestbuy-Computer Monitor 22550 125.71 05/11/2026 103-30-4316-0000 U.S. Bank Harbor Freight-Range Cleaning Supplies 22550 718.23 05/11/2026 843.94 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4376-0000 CA Dept of Tax & Fee Admin Sales Taxes Out of State Purchase Jan-March 2026 22556 30.00 05/15/2026

30.00 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4376-0000 Quench USA, Inc Drinking Water Service May 2026 PD 22574 96.58 05/15/2026

96.58 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Paper 22550 169.27 05/11/2026 103-30-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Dividers 22550 20.84 05/11/2026 103-30-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Allure-Supplies 22550 36.08 05/11/2026 103-30-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Dividers for Budget Binders 22550 41.68 05/11/2026 103-30-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Office Supplies 22550 24.68 05/11/2026 292.55 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4376-0175 Dooley Enterprises Inc Ammunition 22514 6,716.06 05/01/2026 6,716.06 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4376-0200 U.S. Bank Amazon-Supplies for Donuts w/Dispatch 22550 102.24 05/11/2026 103-30-4376-0200 U.S. Bank Amazon-Pencil for Community Events 22550 97.08 05/11/2026 103-30-4376-0200 U.S. Bank Amazon-Table Cover for Donuts w/Dispatch 22550 13.54 05/11/2026 103-30-4376-0200 U.S. Bank Lightcats--Activities for Donuts for Dispatch 22550 417.00 05/11/2026 103-30-4376-0200 U.S. Bank Amazon-Custom Pens for Community Events 22550 186.56 05/11/2026 103-30-4376-0200 U.S. Bank Amazon-Pins for Donuts w/Dispatch 22550 25.01 05/11/2026 103-30-4376-0200 U.S. Bank Amazon-Supplies for Donuts w/Dispatch 22550 60.36 05/11/2026 103-30-4376-0200 U.S. Bank Amazon-Plates/Bags for Community Events 22550 94.73 05/11/2026 103-30-4376-0200 U.S. Bank Amazon-Supplies Donuts w/Dispatch 22550 51.82 05/11/2026 1,048.34 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 35 PAGE 314 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 103-30-4412-0000 U.S. Bank UPS Store Mailing Dispatch Exam 22550 16.97 05/11/2026 103-30-4412-0000 U.S. Bank UPS-Mailing Officer Exams 22550 15.43 05/11/2026

32.40 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4415-0000 Christina Curtis Training-Commuter Lunch 5/13/26 0 8.00 05/01/2026

8.00 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4415-0000 Danny Gutierrez Training-Commuter Lunch (4) 5/4/26-5/7/26 0 32.00 05/01/2026

32.00 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4415-0000 LA County Sheriff's Department LASD-Academy Recruit Training Recruit TSU 22611 7,832.00 0000001278 05/29/2026 7,832.00 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4415-0000 Rio Hondo College Training-Ofc Hernandez 22533 25.00 05/01/2026

25.00 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4415-0000 U.S. Bank Rio Hondo College -Training 6 Officers 22550 150.00 05/11/2026 103-30-4415-0000 U.S. Bank CA Police Chief-Training Cmdr.Qureshi 22550 695.00 05/11/2026 103-30-4415-0000 U.S. Bank CATO -Training Ofc.Corney 22550 334.75 05/11/2026 103-30-4415-0000 U.S. Bank Primal Response-Training Ofc. Elizarraras 22550 1,500.00 05/11/2026 103-30-4415-0000 U.S. Bank Advances Officers-Training Ofc,Bonilla 22550 500.00 05/11/2026 103-30-4415-0000 U.S. Bank OCSD-Training Sgt.Wilson 22550 232.00 05/11/2026 103-30-4415-0000 U.S. Bank Primal Response-Training Ofc. Elizarraras 22550 -750.00 05/11/2026 2,661.75 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4420-0000 U.S. Bank Canva-Business Cards PD Staff 22550 20.86 05/11/2026 103-30-4420-0000 U.S. Bank Canva-Business Cards PD Staff 22550 20.86 05/11/2026

41.72 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4436-0000 Cynthia Saenz Pre-Employment Polygraph-4 PD Applicant 0 900.00 05/01/2026 900.00 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 36 PAGE 315 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 103-30-4436-0000 Rio Hondo College Training-Recruit Edmonds and C.Aguiar 22533 50.00 05/01/2026

50.00 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4436-0000 Susan Saxe-Clifford PH.D. Inc Psychological Evaluation-Police Officer Applicant 22534 400.00 05/01/2026 400.00 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4468-0000 Diana Gascon Reimbursement-Notary Public Commission 22519 44.75 05/01/2026

44.75 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4468-0000 Joseline Heredia Training-Per Diem Rate Lunch 4/29/26 22523 23.00 05/01/2026

23.00 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4468-0000 U.S. Bank Gyromania-Training Dinner Cmdr. Blonde 22550 20.75 05/11/2026 103-30-4468-0000 U.S. Bank RTC-Training Ofc.Richardson 22550 334.72 05/11/2026 103-30-4468-0000 U.S. Bank Jersey Mike-Training Dinner Cmdr. Blonde 22550 15.30 05/11/2026 370.77 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4480-0000 U.S. Bank Smart & Final- Drinks for Patrol Officer during Heatwave 22550 58.89 05/11/2026 103-30-4480-0000 U.S. Bank Town & Country Conference Hotel- 4 Nights Chief Incontro 22550 915.05 05/11/2026 973.94 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4492-0003 CA Dept of Tax & Fee Admin Sales Taxes Out of State Purchase Jan-March 2026 22556 20.75 05/15/2026

20.75 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4492-0003 Entenmann-Rovin Co Badges (8) 22560 953.99 05/15/2026 953.99 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4492-0003 U.S. Bank Pasadena Embroidery -Bike Detail Uniform 22550 127.40 05/11/2026 103-30-4492-0003 U.S. Bank Super Cleaners-Uniform Alterations 22550 58.00 05/11/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 37 PAGE 316 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 185.40 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service March-April 2026 PD 22540 83.01 05/01/2026

83.01 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service March-April 2026 PD 22499 3,488.34 05/01/2026 103-30-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service April-May 2026 PD 22593 3,488.08 05/29/2026 6,976.42 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4500-9025 AT&T Long Distance Long Distance Phone Service PD 22501 50.57 05/01/2026 103-30-4500-9025 AT&T Long Distance Long Distance Phone Service PD 22595 50.57 05/29/2026 101.14 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4500-9025 AT&T Mobility MiFi Service April 2026 (Chief Incontro) 22502 40.25 05/01/2026 103-30-4500-9025 AT&T Mobility MiFi Service May 2026 (Chief Incontro) 22596 40.25 05/29/2026

80.50 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4500-9025 Charter Communications Cable Internet Service April 2026 PD 22541 229.99 05/01/2026 103-30-4500-9025 Charter Communications Cable Internet Service May 2026 PD 22625 229.99 05/29/2026 459.98 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4508-0000 Ford of Montebello Coolant Leak 22518 940.73 05/01/2026 940.73 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4508-0000 U.S. Bank King Bolt- PD Bolts for Cage in Cars 22550 14.84 05/11/2026 103-30-4508-0000 U.S. Bank Retro-Spec Decals for Motor #15 & #17 22550 504.73 05/11/2026 103-30-4508-0000 U.S. Bank Chargepoint-Vehicle Charging 22550 10.56 05/11/2026 530.13 Vendor Subtotal:
103-30-4508-0000 WEX Bank Fuel 2/25/26-3/25/26 PD 22588 86.40 05/15/2026 103-30-4508-0000 WEX Bank Fuel 3/25/26-4/25/26 PD 22588 111.76 05/15/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 38 PAGE 317 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 198.16 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-3332-0000 Garfield Medical Center Paramedic Refund-Overpayment/Payment Error P25121101921211400004 22489 3,475.16 05/01/2026 3,475.16 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-3332-0000 Blue Shield of California Paramedic Refund-Overpayment/Payment Error 22490 3,416.00 05/01/2026 103-34-3332-0000 Blue Shield of California Paramedic Refund-Overpayment/Payment Error 22490 323.35 05/01/2026 3,739.35 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-3332-0000 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Paramedic Refund-Overpayment/Payment Error 22491 648.44 05/01/2026 103-34-3332-0000 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Paramedic Refund-Overpayment/Payment Error 22491 543.01 05/01/2026 1,191.45 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4010-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium April 2026 22554 -19.92 05/15/2026 103-34-4010-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium April 2026 22591 19.92 05/29/2026

0.00 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4010-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium May 2026 22557 89.45 05/15/2026

89.45 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4010-0000 H. Wilson Insurancenter Inc Adjustment Premium May 2026 0 28.50 05/15/2026

28.50 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co Adjustment Premium May 2026 22567 -5.30 05/15/2026 103-34-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co Adjustment Premium June 2026 22612 -5.30 05/29/2026 -10.60 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4010-0000 Mutual of Omaha Adjustment Premium April 2026 22568 -9.38 05/15/2026 -9.38 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 39 PAGE 318 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 103-34-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Premium May 2026 0 2,863.62 05/15/2026 2,863.62 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4150-0000 EMS QI Partners, LLC EMS QI & Education April 2026 0 2,499.16 05/01/2026 2,499.16 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4150-0000 Wittman Enterprises LLC EMS Billing Service Feb 2026 0 4,792.81 0000001186 05/01/2026 103-34-4150-0000 Wittman Enterprises LLC EMS Billing Service March 2026 0 3,394.35 0000001186 05/01/2026 8,187.16 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4204-0000 U.S. Bank Star News- Monthly Subscription FD 22550 12.00 05/11/2026 103-34-4204-0000 U.S. Bank LA Times- Monthly Subscription FD 22550 27.72 05/11/2026

39.72 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4206-0000 CA Dept of Tax & Fee Admin Sales Taxes Out of State Purchase Jan-March 2026 22556 38.50 05/15/2026

38.50 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4206-0000 Veritiv Operating Company Janitorial Supplies 0 855.89 05/01/2026 855.89 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4206-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Maintenance Supplies 22550 137.21 05/11/2026 137.21 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease April 2026 -FD 0 117.37 0000001206 05/01/2026 117.37 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Contract Base Rate Charge 3/13/26-4/12/26 FD 0 103.73 0000001205 05/01/2026 103-34-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Copier Contract Base Rate Charge 4/13/26-5/12/26 FD 0 103.73 0000001205 05/01/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 40 PAGE 319 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 207.46 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4316-0000 Joseph Sepulveda Gel Ear Seals 8 Pairs 22511 228.28 05/01/2026 228.28 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4316-0000 Turnout Maintenance Co LLC Turnout Maintenance 22544 247.40 05/01/2026 247.40 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4376-0000 Life-Assist Inc EMS Supplies 0 1,934.45 0000001228 05/01/2026 103-34-4376-0000 Life-Assist Inc EMS Supplies 0 2,844.03 0000001228 05/01/2026 103-34-4376-0000 Life-Assist Inc EMS Supplies 0 2,605.21 0000001228 05/01/2026 103-34-4376-0000 Life-Assist Inc EMS Supplies 0 816.85 0000001228 05/01/2026 103-34-4376-0000 Life-Assist Inc EMS Supplies 0 715.57 0000001228 05/01/2026 103-34-4376-0000 Life-Assist Inc EMS Supplies 0 46.05 0000001228 05/01/2026 8,962.16 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4376-0000 Linde Gas & Equipment In Oxygen 22525 215.92 05/01/2026 215.92 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4376-0000 Office Depot Office Supplies & Paper 22530 64.72 05/01/2026

64.72 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Charging Cables 22550 93.23 05/11/2026 103-34-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-White Board 22550 42.79 05/11/2026 103-34-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Costco-Water and Work Gloves 22550 118.31 05/11/2026 103-34-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Phone Case 22550 49.33 05/11/2026 303.66 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4396-0000 U.S. Bank NFPA-Membership Chief Rueda 22550 225.00 05/11/2026 225.00 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 41 PAGE 320 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 103-34-4399-0000 Allstar Fire Equipment Inc Hook 22496 188.44 05/01/2026 188.44 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4399-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Laser Tape Measure Fire Prevention 22550 30.72 05/11/2026

30.72 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4436-0000 U.S. Bank Impressions- Uniform Embroidery 22550 221.00 05/11/2026 103-34-4436-0000 U.S. Bank Firemans Graphics- Helmet Decals-Rivera 22550 19.52 05/11/2026 240.52 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4468-0000 U.S. Bank Emergency Medical Service-Paramedic License D.Tannehill 22550 300.00 05/11/2026 103-34-4468-0000 U.S. Bank Permit Store-Training M.White 22550 9.00 05/11/2026 103-34-4468-0000 U.S. Bank Dept Of Health Service-Paramedic Reaccreditation D.Tannehill 22550 102.22 05/11/2026 103-34-4468-0000 U.S. Bank Permit Store-Training M.White 22550 6.00 05/11/2026 417.22 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4480-0000 U.S. Bank 2026 Mountain Conference- Registration Chief Rueda 22550 1,175.00 05/11/2026 1,175.00 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service March-April 2026 FD 22540 352.92 05/01/2026 352.92 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service March-April 2026 F D 22499 3,533.87 05/01/2026 3,533.87 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4500-9025 AT&T City Hall Compound Internet Service April 2026 FD 22500 185.36 05/01/2026 103-34-4500-9025 AT&T City Hall Compound Internet Service May 2026 FD 22594 185.36 05/29/2026 370.72 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4500-9025 AT&T Long Distance Long Distance Phone Service FD 22501 50.57 05/01/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 42 PAGE 321 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No

50.57 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4500-9025 U.S. Bank Ring Central-Fax Line FD 22550 23.73 05/11/2026

23.73 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4508-0000 Public Safety Supply and Service LLCMCT Installation-E91, E791, RA91 & RA791 22532 1,250.00 05/01/2026 1,250.00 Vendor Subtotal:
103-34-4508-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Glass Cleaner 22550 25.32 05/11/2026 103-34-4508-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-RA791 Cable 22550 19.68 05/11/2026 103-34-4508-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-B9 Keychain 22550 8.65 05/11/2026

53.65 Vendor Subtotal:

Subtotal for Fund: 103 107,433.53
202-48-4150-9020 Nationwide Environmental Service Street Sweeping Service April 2026 22528 1,305.42 0000001191 05/01/2026 202-48-4150-9020 Nationwide Environmental Service Street Sweeping Service May 2026 22569 1,305.42 0000001191 05/15/2026 2,610.84 Vendor Subtotal:

Subtotal for Fund: 202 2,610.84
204-48-4600-9272 CT&T Concrete Paving ADA Curb Ramp Replacement -Retention Payment 22512 8,605.30 0000001260 05/01/2026 8,605.30 Vendor Subtotal:

Subtotal for Fund: 204 8,605.30
207-30-4150-0000 All City Management Services Inc School Crossing Guard Service 3/29/26-4/11/26 0 5,595.34 0000001246 05/01/2026 207-30-4150-0000 All City Management Services Inc Crossing Guard Service 4/12/26-4/25/26 0 10,088.64 0000001246 05/15/2026 15,683.98 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 43 PAGE 322 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 207-64-4208-0000 Gold Coast Tours Prop A Senior Trip 4/30/26 22563 1,750.00 05/15/2026 1,750.00 Vendor Subtotal:

Subtotal for Fund: 207 17,433.98
218-30-4613-4700 All Traffic Solutions Speed Alert 24 Radar Message Sign with ATS-5 Trailer 22497 20,482.12 0000001269 05/01/2026 218-30-4613-4700 All Traffic Solutions Speed Alert 24 Radar Message Sign with Hitch Mount and Portable 22497 14,013.10 0000001269 05/01/2026 34,495.22 Vendor Subtotal:

Subtotal for Fund: 218 34,495.22
233-30-4613-0003 Foothill Communications Inc Installation of Motorola in-Car Radios 22517 5,072.38 0000001217 05/01/2026 233-30-4613-0003 Foothill Communications Inc Installation of Motorola in-Car Radios 22517 5,072.38 0000001217 05/01/2026 233-30-4613-0003 Foothill Communications Inc Installation of Motorola in-Car Radios 22561 5,072.38 0000001217 05/15/2026 233-30-4613-0003 Foothill Communications Inc Installation of Motorola in-Car Radios 22561 4,372.51 0000001217 05/15/2026 233-30-4613-0003 Foothill Communications Inc Installation of Motorola in-Car Radios 22605 2,847.30 0000001217 05/29/2026 233-30-4613-0003 Foothill Communications Inc Installation of Motorola in-Car Radios 22605 6,272.38 0000001217 05/29/2026 233-30-4613-0003 Foothill Communications Inc Installation of Motorola in-Car Radios 22605 915.00 0000001217 05/29/2026 29,624.33 Vendor Subtotal:

Subtotal for Fund: 233 29,624.33
246-48-4150-9020 Nationwide Environmental Service Street Sweeping Service April 2026 22528 35,408.33 0000001191 05/01/2026 246-48-4150-9020 Nationwide Environmental Service Street Sweeping Service May 2026 22569 35,408.33 0000001191 05/15/2026 70,816.66 Vendor Subtotal:

Subtotal for Fund: 246 70,816.66
281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 88.02 0000001210 05/01/2026 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 83.39 0000001210 05/01/2026 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 86.67 0000001210 05/01/2026 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 32.05 0000001210 05/01/2026 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 51.14 0000001210 05/01/2026 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 22.82 0000001210 05/01/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 44 PAGE 323 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 128.84 0000001210 05/01/2026 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 30.07 0000001210 05/01/2026 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 485.97 0000001210 05/15/2026 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 423.72 0000001210 05/15/2026 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 109.09 0000001210 05/15/2026 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 43.57 0000001210 05/15/2026 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 30.07 0000001210 05/29/2026 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 236.81 0000001210 05/29/2026 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 28.74 0000001210 05/29/2026 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 28.76 0000001210 05/29/2026 1,909.73 Vendor Subtotal:
281-91-4370-0000 OverDrive Inc eBooks 22531 38.00 05/01/2026 281-91-4370-0000 OverDrive Inc eBooks 22572 27.50 05/15/2026 281-91-4370-0000 OverDrive Inc eBooks 22572 517.92 05/15/2026 281-91-4370-0000 OverDrive Inc eBooks 22572 916.15 05/15/2026 1,499.57 Vendor Subtotal:
281-91-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Books 0 30.07 0000001210 05/01/2026 281-91-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Books 0 466.28 0000001210 05/01/2026 281-91-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Books 0 120.95 0000001210 05/15/2026 281-91-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Credit 0 -22.39 0000001210 05/15/2026 281-91-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Books 0 38.59 0000001210 05/15/2026 281-91-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Credit 0 -22.39 0000001210 05/15/2026 281-91-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Books 0 33.34 0000001210 05/15/2026 644.45 Vendor Subtotal:
281-91-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Program Supplies -Trash Talk 22550 12.54 05/11/2026 281-91-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Program Supplies -Trash Talk 22550 77.63 05/11/2026

90.17 Vendor Subtotal:
281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 24.85 0000001210 05/01/2026 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 131.34 0000001210 05/01/2026 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 43.69 0000001210 05/01/2026 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Credit 0 -12.34 0000001210 05/01/2026 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 21.50 0000001210 05/15/2026 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 57.12 0000001210 05/15/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 45 PAGE 324 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 11.84 0000001210 05/15/2026 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 16.15 0000001210 05/15/2026 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 545.60 0000001210 05/15/2026 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 38.83 0000001210 05/15/2026 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 39.28 0000001210 05/29/2026 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 0 62.35 0000001210 05/29/2026 980.21 Vendor Subtotal:
281-92-4370-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Books 22550 25.90 05/11/2026

25.90 Vendor Subtotal:
281-92-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Books 0 43.62 0000001210 05/01/2026 281-92-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Credit 0 -46.63 0000001210 05/01/2026 281-92-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Books 0 46.63 0000001210 05/15/2026 281-92-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Books 0 25.38 0000001210 05/15/2026 281-92-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Books 0 43.22 0000001210 05/15/2026 281-92-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Credit 0 -3.56 0000001210 05/29/2026 108.66 Vendor Subtotal:
281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Program Supplies-Mario Madness 22550 33.32 05/11/2026 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Program Supplies-Bedazzle Books 22550 29.58 05/11/2026 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Program Supplies-Mario Madness 22550 41.86 05/11/2026 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Program Supplies-Spy School 22550 53.18 05/11/2026 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Program Supplies-Bedazzle Books 22550 155.54 05/11/2026 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Program Supplies-Bedazzle Books 22550 68.73 05/11/2026 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Program Supplies-DIY Winterful 22550 40.53 05/11/2026 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Program Supplies-DIY Winterful 22550 10.96 05/11/2026 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Program Supplies-Mario Madness 22550 15.78 05/11/2026 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Program Supplies-Storytime 22550 16.67 05/11/2026 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Program Supplies-Create Northern Lights 22550 54.86 05/11/2026 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Program Supplies-Create Northern Lights 22550 26.21 05/11/2026 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Program Supplies-Create Northern Lights 22550 16.78 05/11/2026 564.00 Vendor Subtotal:

Subtotal for Fund: 281 5,822.69
394-40-4600-1003 U.S. Bank Home Depot- Kitchen Sink Bowl & Garbage Disposal 22550 667.86 05/11/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 46 PAGE 325 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 394-40-4600-1003 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Counter Top PW Breakroom 22550 1,857.00 05/11/2026 2,524.86 Vendor Subtotal:
394-44-4600-8022 Southern California Edison Co Electrical Upgrade -Lift Station Project 22578 7,631.60 05/15/2026 7,631.60 Vendor Subtotal:
394-48-4600-0533 Hartzog & Crabill, Inc Traffic Engineering Service Speed Concern- Winston Ave 22522 3,510.00 0000001218 05/01/2026 394-48-4600-0533 Hartzog & Crabill, Inc Traffic Engineering Service Speed Concern- Belhaven Rd 22522 3,800.00 0000001218 05/01/2026 394-48-4600-0533 Hartzog & Crabill, Inc Traffic Engineering Service Speed Concern- Euston Rd 22522 1,975.00 0000001218 05/01/2026 394-48-4600-0533 Hartzog & Crabill, Inc Traffic Engineering Service Speed Concern- San Marino Ave 22522 1,560.00 0000001218 05/01/2026 394-48-4600-0533 Hartzog & Crabill, Inc On-Call Traffic Engineering Service Speed Euston/Sierra Madre 22606 2,712.50 0000001218 05/29/2026 394-48-4600-0533 Hartzog & Crabill, Inc On-Call Traffic Engineering Service -Speed San Marino Ave 22606 2,712.50 0000001218 05/29/2026 16,270.00 Vendor Subtotal:
394-48-4600-0533 Transtech Engineers, Inc Traffic Engineering Service Mission/Los Robles Bulbout Review 22543 880.00 0000001222 05/01/2026 880.00 Vendor Subtotal:
394-48-4600-9271 Nichols Consulting Engineers Project Management for Street Rehabilitation March 2026 22529 17,028.79 0000001261 05/01/2026 17,028.79 Vendor Subtotal:
394-48-4600-9273 JCL Traffic Street Signs 22610 339.68 05/29/2026 394-48-4600-9273 JCL Traffic Street Signs 22610 231.39 05/29/2026 394-48-4600-9273 JCL Traffic Street Signs 22610 898.70 05/29/2026 1,469.77 Vendor Subtotal:

Subtotal for Fund: 394 45,805.02
591-34-4613-9300 Hi Quality Auto Body Inc Door Repair BC9 0 2,097.64 05/01/2026 2,097.64 Vendor Subtotal:
591-34-4613-9300 Public Safety Supply and Service LLCMCT Installation-BC9 & Reserve BC 22532 750.00 05/01/2026 AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 47 PAGE 326 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No 750.00 Vendor Subtotal:

Subtotal for Fund: 591 2,847.64
595-10-4150-0000 AdminSure Inc Workers' Compensation Claims Admin May 2026 0 1,980.00 0000001180 05/15/2026 595-10-4150-0000 AdminSure Inc Workers' Compensation Claims Admin June 2026 0 1,980.00 0000001180 05/29/2026 3,960.00 Vendor Subtotal:

Subtotal for Fund: 595 3,960.00
596-08-4356-3412 CA JPIA Property Insurance 7/1/25-6/30/26 0 82,528.00 05/01/2026 82,528.00 Vendor Subtotal:

Subtotal for Fund: 596 82,528.00
609-00-2002-0000 Metro Water Domestic Water March 2026 0 63,509.03 05/29/2026 63,509.03 Vendor Subtotal:
609-00-2048-0070 Jacquelina Chan Refund-Deposit Rental SMCC 22552 174.00 05/15/2026 174.00 Vendor Subtotal:
609-00-2048-2575 Friends of Crowell Public Lib Credit Card Sales Friends Bookstore April 2026 22562 932.25 05/15/2026 932.25 Vendor Subtotal:

Subtotal for Fund: 609 64,615.28
700-44-4150-0000 Premier Pipe Inc. Sewer Cleaning & Maintenance Service March 2026 22573 8,478.00 0000001238 05/15/2026 8,478.00 Vendor Subtotal:

AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 48 PAGE 327 of 341
Account Number Vendor Amount GL Date Description Check No PO No Subtotal for Fund: 700 8,478.00
Report Total: 1,812,773.19
AP-Transactions by Account (06/01/2026 - 12:15 PM) Page 49 PAGE 328 of 341
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Alison Walker, City Clerk
DATE: June 10, 2026
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MINUTES

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Engaged and Connected Residents
Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND
The City Council of the City of San Marino, at a Regular Meeting held on Wednesday, April 9, 2014, approved the action minute format for City Council and all Advisory Body meetings.

DISCUSSION
Attached for Council consideration are the following City Council Minutes:

Special Meeting of May 13, 2026;
Regular Meeting of May 13, 2026; and
Adjourned Regular Meeting of May 29, 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
None.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 329 of 341

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Council approve the May 2026 Minutes. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of May 13, 2026, the Regular Meeting of May 13, 2026, and the Adjourned Regular Meeting of May 29, 2026.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. Minutes of May 13, 2026 - Special Meeting

2. Minutes of May 13, 2026 - Regular Meeting

3. Minutes of May 29, 2026 - Adjourned Regular Meeting
PAGE 330 of 341

MINUTES

SPECIAL MEETING

OF THE SAN MARINO CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, MAY 13, 2026 AT 4:30 PM

CITY HALL EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (EOC)
AND

BUSINESS CENTER OF CROWNE PLAZA PALO ALTO
4290 EL CAMINO REAL
PALO ALTO, CA 94306

CALL TO ORDER
Vice Mayor Lo called the meeting to order at 4:53 p.m., in the City Hall Emergency Operations Center (EOC), located at 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino, CA 91108.

ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Vice Mayor Lo, Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Council Member Shepherd Romey
ABSENT: Mayor Chou

CLOSED SESSION
At 4:54 p.m., the City Council recessed to closed session in the EOC to discuss the following items:

1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6
City Negotiator(s):

City Manager Eskandar
Human Resources Director Guerrero
Employee Organization(s):

San Marino Police Officers’ Association
San Marino Firefighters’ Association
San Marino City Employees’ Association
Unrepresented Employees

2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION GOVERNMENT CODE 54956.9 (D)(2)
The City Council is meeting with respect to two (2) matters of significant exposure to litigation against the City.

RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
At 6:09 p.m. the City Council reconvened to open session.

PAGE 331 of 341

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING
WEDNESDAY, MAY 13, 2026 PAGE 2 OF 2

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
The City Council met on Items 1 through 2 and there was no reportable action.

ADJOURNMENT
At 6:10 p.m., Vice Mayor Lo adjourned the special meeting.

ALISON WALKER

CITY CLERK
PAGE 332 of 341

MINUTES

REGULAR MEETING

OF THE SAN MARINO CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, MAY 13, 2026 AT 6:00 PM

CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS

CALL TO ORDER
Vice Mayor Lo called the regular meeting to order at 6:15 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, located at 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino, California 91108.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Vice Mayor Lo.

ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Mayor Chou (participating remotely), Vice Mayor Lo, Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Council Member Shepherd Romey
ABSENT: None

PUBLIC COMMENTS
The following person(s) provided comment:
- None

CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Eskandar gave the report.

PRESENTATION

PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION FOR NATIONAL PUBLIC SERVICE

RECOGNITION WEEK
City Manager Eskandar received the proclamation.

PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION FOR NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK Parks and Public Works Director/City Engineer Shah received the proclamation.

PROCLAMATION FOR NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT WEEK
Police Chief Incontro received the proclamation.

PROCLAMATION FOR MAY AS WATER AWARENESS MONTH
Robert Stoerchle from California American Water received the proclamation. PAGE 333 of 341

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, MAY 13, 2026 PAGE 2 OF 4

PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION R-26-09 AUTHORIZING THE COLLECTION

OF SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY PROPERTY TAX ROLL FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027
Finance Director Guriola-Leon presented the staff report.

Vice Mayor Lo opened the public hearing for comments.

The following person(s) provided public comment:
- None
Moved by Council Member Chou and seconded by Council Member Chang to approve Resolution No. R-26-09, Establishing Sewer Service Charge Amounts, and authorizing the collection of the Sewer Service charges on the Los Angeles County Property Tax Roll for Fiscal Year 2026-27.

Motion passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo, Mayor Chou
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

CONTINUED BUSINESS

The following person(s) provided comment:
- None
Council Member Chang moved, seconded by Council Member Chou to receive and file the report of repair/remediation actions undertaken to date and to extend the emergency action approved in Resolution No. R-26-08 to facilitate the expeditious restoration of Fire Station 91.

Motion passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo, Mayor Chou
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
PAGE 334 of 341

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, MAY 13, 2026 PAGE 3 OF 4
ABSENT: None

CONSENT CALENDAR
Council Member Chang moved, seconded by Council Member Chou to approve Items 3 through 6 of the consent calendar.

Motion passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo, Mayor Chou
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

3. ACCEPTING CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES 911 AWARD

MONEY FOR THE PURPOSES OF UPGRADING THE CURRENT SAN MARINO

POLICE DEPARTMENT PUBLIC SAFETY ANSWERING EQUIPMENT
FOR $365,000
The City Council accepted the California Office of Emergency Services 911 funds for the purpose of upgrading the current San Marino Police Department Public Safety Answering Equipment, in the amount of $365,000; and authorize the City Manager to execute any documents required to receive the equipment contemplated by the grant.

4. APPROVAL OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR MEASURE B ADVISORY BOARD FUNDING GRANT
The City Council authorized the City Manager to accept the 2025 Measure B grant funds and 1) execute the agreement with the County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services for a performance period of May 14, 2026 to June 30, 2027; 2) approved budget amendments required; and 3) dispense with competitive bidding requirements pursuant to SMMC §02.06.05 B. 2 b and authorized the Fire Department to purchase (2) Zoll X-Series Cardiac Monitors and (1) AutoPulse NXT Resuscitation Device from Zoll Medical Corporation in the amount of $156,656.13 and (1) Stryker Power Pro 2 Ambulance Cot from Stryker Sales, LLC in the amount of $45,843.95.

5. RECEIVE AND FILE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS REPORT FOR APRIL 2026
The City Council received and filed the Monthly Disbursements Report for the month of April 2026.

PAGE 335 of 341

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, MAY 13, 2026 PAGE 4 OF 4

6. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The City Council approved the Minutes of the Special Meeting of April 8, 2026, the Regular Meeting of April 8, 2026, the Adjourned Regular Meeting of April 24, 2026, and the Special Meeting of April 24, 2026.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
The following item(s) were requested:
- None

ADJOURNMENT
At 7:00 p.m., Vice Mayor Lo adjourned the meeting to Friday, May 29, at 8:30 a.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers.

ALISON WALKER

CITY CLERK
PAGE 336 of 341

MINUTES

ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING

OF THE SAN MARINO CITY COUNCIL
FRIDAY, MAY 29, 2026 AT 8:30 AM

CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AND
NO. 35 HANGZHOU S RD. SEC. 1

TAIPEI CITY, TAIWAN

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Chou called the adjourned regular meeting to order at 8:31 a.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, located at 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino, California 91108.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Chou.

ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Mayor Chou, Vice Mayor Lo (participating remotely), Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou,
Council Member Shepherd Romey
ABSENT: None

PUBLIC COMMENTS
The following person(s) provided comment:
- None

NEW BUSINESS

1. ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED OPERATING & CAPITAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
Finance Director Guirola-Leon gave the presentation.

The following person(s) provided comment:
- None
Council Member Chang moved, seconded by Council Member Shepherd Romey to adopt (1) Resolution No. R-26-19, Adopting the Operating and Capital Budget for the Fiscal Year 2026-27 and Appropriating the Amounts Specified therein from the Funds and for the Purposes Indicated; (2) Resolution No. R-26-11 Updating the Schedule of Fees for Service, (3) Resolution No. R-26-12 approving the updated salary schedule for FY 2026-2027, (4) Resolution No. R-26-13, amending the Unrepresented Employees Salary and Benefits Schedule for the period covering July 1, 2024, thru June 30, 2027, to include the position of parttime Recreation Coordinator and (5) Resolution No. R-26-14 amending the job PAGE 337 of 341

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
FRIDAY, MAY 29, 2026 PAGE 2 OF 5
classification of Facilities Supervisor-Community Services, and accepted the corrections stated by staff.

Motion passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo, Mayor Chou
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

CONSENT CALENDAR
Council Member Chou moved, seconded by Council Member Chang, to approve Items 2 through 8 and Item 10 of the consent calendar.

Motion passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo, Mayor Chou
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

2. REPORT ON EMERGENCY ACTIONS TAKEN TO REPAIR/REMEDIATE FIRE STATION 91 AND REQUEST TO EXTEND EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT
PURSUANT TO PUBLIC CONTRACTS CODE SECTION 22050 AND SAN MARINO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.06.05(A)(8)
The City Council received and filed the report of repair/remediation actions undertaken to date and to extend the emergency action approved in Resolution No. R-26-08 to facilitate the expeditious restoration of Fire Station 91.

3. APPROVE THE FULFILLMENT AGREEMENT FOR UNPROGRAMMED
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM – LOCAL (STP-L) FUNDS WITH

THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE

FULLFILLMENT AGREEMENT AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTS NECESSARY

TO RECEIVE AND ADMINISTER THE FUNDS
The City Council 1) approved the Fulfillment Agreement for Unprogrammed Surface Transportation Program – Local (STP-L) Funds with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority and 2) authorized the City Manager to execute the Fulfillment Agreement and any related documents necessary to receive and administer the funds.

4. APPROVAL OF MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH FLEET SERVICES, INC.

The City Council 1) awarded a Maintenance Services Agreement with Fleet Services, Inc to provide vehicle maintenance services for a three (3) year term PAGE 338 of 341

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
FRIDAY, MAY 29, 2026 PAGE 3 OF 5
in an amount not to exceed $200,000 and 2) delegated the City Manager the authority to award two (2) optional one-year Maintenance Service Agreements subject to satisfactory performance and Council authorization of the annual budget.

5. APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT AMENDEMENT WITH THE COUNSELING

TEAM INTERNATIONAL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH & WELLNESS

SERVICES FOR PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL
The City Council approved a contract amendment with The Counseling Team International for behavioral health and wellness services for public safety personnel for a three (3) year term in the amount not to exceed $75,521.58.

6. APPROVE THE RENEWAL OF AGREEMENT WITH NEOGOV FOR CLOUDBASED SOFTWARE TO INCLUDE RECRUITMENT, APPLICANT TRACKING,

AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT MODULES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $58,809.16 OVER 3 YEARS
The City Council approved to include recruitment, applicant tracking, and performance management modules beginning July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2029, in an amount not to exceed $58,809.16 and authorized the City Manager to execute all necessary documents.

7. APPROVAL OF SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH LYNGSOE SYSTEMS
The City Council approved the Service Agreement with Lyngsoe Systems for a term not to exceed two (2) years through December 31, 2027, and authorized the City Manager to execute said agreement.

8. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. R-26-10 ESTABLISHING THE
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
The City Council approved Resolution No. R-26-10, Establishing the Appropriations Limit and Appropriations Subject to Limitation for Fiscal Year 2026-27, and accepted the changes presented by staff.

10. CASH AND INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL 2026 The City Council received and filed the Cash and Investment Report for the Month of April 2026.

CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS PULLED FOR DISCUSSION
Item 9 of the consent calendar was pulled for discussion. The City Council thanked the City Treasurer and incoming advisory body members for their interest in serving. The City Council also thanked the outgoing advisory body members for their service.

PAGE 339 of 341

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
FRIDAY, MAY 29, 2026 PAGE 4 OF 5

9. APPOINTMENT OF A CITY TREASURER AND MEMBERS TO CITY OF SAN MARINO ADVISORY BODIES AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. R-26- 20, CHANGING THE LOCATION, FREQUENCY, AND ATTENDANCE POLICY

OF ADVISORY BODY MEETINGS
The following person(s) provide comment for Item 9:
- None
Council Member Chou moved, seconded by Council Member Chang, to approve Item 9 of the consent calendar.

Motion passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo, Mayor Chou
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
The City Council appointed Rick Chou, and Mark Giles as regular members and Jeff Boozell as an alternate member of the Planning Commission to serve terms ending May 31, 2030.

The City Council appointed Raymond Cheng, Ted Lee, and Steven Jones as regular members and Ingrid Kolesk as an alternate member of the Design Review Committee to serve terms ending May 31, 2028.

The City Council appointed Jovanie Arias as a regular member and Gene Chen as an alternate member of the Design Review Committee to serve partial terms ending May 31, 2027.

The City Council appointed Brian Davis, Timothy Kolesk and Steve Domier as regular members of the Public Safety Commission to serve terms ending May 31, 2030.

The City Council appointed Marilyn Peck as a regular member and Susan Boegh and Jody Nichols as alternate members of the Library Board of Trustees to serve terms ending May 31, 2029.

The City Council appointed Stanley Wu and Louie Pascua as regular members of the Recreation Commission to serve terms ending May 31, 2030.

The City Council appointed Clarice Dai as City Treasurer to serve a term ending May 31, 2030.

The City Council directed the City Clerk to post the updated Local Appointments List to reflect these appointments.

The City Council adopted Resolution No. R-26-20, changing location, frequency and attendance policy of advisory body meetings.

PAGE 340 of 341

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
FRIDAY, MAY 29, 2026 PAGE 5 OF 5

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS OR PUBLIC WRITINGS DISTRIBUTION
The following person(s) provided written communications or public writings:
- None

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
The following item(s) were requested:
- None

ADJOURNMENT
At 10:11 a.m., Mayor Chou adjourned the meeting.

ALISON WALKER

CITY CLERK
PAGE 341 of 341

San Marino City CouncilJune 10, 2026

San Marino City Council
June 10, 2026