Agenda packet — San Marino City Council, October 14, 2026 (part 1 of 2)

CITY OF SAN MARINO
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Mayor
Tony Chou, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Calvin Lo, Council Member
Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
www.SanMarinoCA.gov
(626) 3000700 Phone
City Hall Council Chamber
2200 Huntington Drive
San Marino, CA 91108
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
SAN MARINO CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 14, 2026 AT 6:00 PM
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
2200 HUNTINGTON DRIVE
SAN MARINO, CA 91108
The City of San Marino appreciates your attendance. Citizens’ interest provides the Council with valuable information regarding issues of the community.

Regular meetings are held on the 2nd Wednesday of every month at 6:00 p.m.

Typically, adjourned meetings are held on the last Friday of every month at 8:30 a.m.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, any person with a disability who requires a reasonable modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should contact the City Clerk via email at [email protected] or by phone at (626) 3000705 48 hours prior to the meeting for assistance.

The public is welcome to attend the meeting in person or remotely via Zoom, however, the meeting will proceed as normal even if there are technical difficulties with Zoom. The City will do it’s best to resolve any technical issues as quickly as possible.

How to view or listen to the meeting from home:

Visit www.SanMarinoCA.gov/Zoom
How to offer public comment from home:

Public comment will be accepted by email to [email protected] until 3:00 p.m. the day before the meeting. Written public comment received by 3:00 p.m. will be distributed to City Council during the meeting. Any comments received after 3:00 p.m. will be included in the public comment record but not provided to City Council at the meeting.

Written public comment will be accepted electronically via the zoom.us teleconference module during the meeting. Written Zoom comments will be accepted after the inperson comments. Written Zoom comments will be read or summarized, then printed and made part of the public record for the meeting. To participate on an item, please use the “Raise Hand” function in Zoom and you will be called to speak at the appropriate time.

CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo, Mayor Chou
POSTING OF AGENDA
The agenda is posted 72 hours prior to each meeting at the following locations: City Hall, 2200 Huntington Drive, the Crowell Public Library, 1890 Huntington Drive, and the Stoneman Building, 1560 Pasqualito Drive. The agenda is also posted on the City’s website:
https://www.SanMarinoCA.gov.

PUBLIC COMMENTS
The City welcomes public input. Members of the public may address the City Council by completing a public comment card and giving it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. At this time, the public may address the City Council on items that are not on the agenda. Pursuant to state law, the City Council may not discuss or take action on issues not on the meeting agenda (Government Code Section 54954.2). The Mayor reserves the right to place limits on duration of comments. Staff may be asked to follow up on such items.

CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
This is an opportunity for the City Manager to inform the City Council and the public of any upcoming events or matters of interest to the community.

PRESENTATION
CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION TO FIRE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL FOR LIFESAVING ACTIONS
CONSENT CALENDAR

1. APPROVAL TO WAIVE THE SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT COST FOR THE SAN MARINO HIGH SCHOOL HOMECOMING PARADE IN THE
AMOUNT OF $8,030.22
PAGE 2 of 358
CERTIFICATE OF RECOGNITION TO FIRE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL FOR LIFESAVING ACTIONS
CONSENT CALENDAR

1. APPROVAL TO WAIVE THE SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT COST FOR THE SAN MARINO HIGH SCHOOL HOMECOMING PARADE IN THE
AMOUNT OF $8,030.22
Recommendation: Staff recommends that the City Council waive the costs associated with the special event permit for the San Marino High School Homecoming Parade.

If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, then the appropriate motion would be: “I move to waive the costs associated with the special event permit for the San Marino High School Homecoming Parade totaling $8,030.22.”

2. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. R2634 AUTHORIZING
SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF RESOURCES RECYCLING AND RECOVERY
(CALRECYCLE) FOR THE RUBBERIZED PAVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM
Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. R2634, authorizing submittal of an application to the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) for the Rubberized Pavement Grant Program and authorizing the City Manager and/or Parks and Public Works Director/City Engineer to execute grantrelated documents necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project(s). If the City Council concurs with staff's recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to adopt Resolution No. R2634 authorizing submittal of an application to the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) for the Rubberized Pavement Grant Program, and authorizing the City Manager and/or Parks and Public Works Director/City Engineer to execute grantrelated documents necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project(s).”

3. COMMITMENT OF DONATIONS FUND YEAREND BALANCE RESERVES Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the accompanying resolution to commit the balance as of June 30, 2026 as noted in the attachments. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to adopt Resolution No. R2632 to commit the balance of $337,011 in the Donations Fund as of June 30, 2026.”

4. REPORT ON REQUEST FOR SUPPORT OF LORAIN ROAD
HALLOWEEN ACTIVITIES
Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council receive and file this staff report.

If City Council agrees with staff’s recommendation, the appropriate motion would be, “I move to receive and file the staff report on the Lorain Road Halloween requests.”

5. REPORT ON EMERGENCY ACTIONS TAKEN TO REPAIR/REMEDIATE FIRE STATION 91 AND REQUEST TO EXTEND EMERGENCY
PROCUREMENT PURSUANT TO PUBLIC CONTRACTS CODE SECTION
22050 AND SAN MARINO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.06.05(A)
(8)
PAGE 3 of 358

4. REPORT ON REQUEST FOR SUPPORT OF LORAIN ROAD
HALLOWEEN ACTIVITIES
Recommendation: Staff recommends the City Council receive and file this staff report.

If City Council agrees with staff’s recommendation, the appropriate motion would be, “I move to receive and file the staff report on the Lorain Road Halloween requests.”

Staff recommends the City Council receive the report of repair/remediation actions undertaken to date and extend the emergency by a 4/5 vote to facilitate expeditious restoration of Fire Station 91. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
"I move to 1) receive and file the report of repair/remediation actions undertaken to date and 2) extend the emergency action approved in Resolution No. R2608 to facilitate the expeditious restoration of Fire Station 91."

6. CASH AND INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF AUGUST 2026 Recommendation:

Staff recommends the Council receive and file this report. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to receive and file the Cash and Investment Report for the Month of August 2026.”

7. RECEIVE AND FILE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS REPORT FOR
SEPTEMBER 2026
Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council receive and file the Monthly Disbursements Report for the month of September 2026. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to receive and file the Monthly Disbursements Report for the month of September 2026.”

8. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Recommendation: Staff recommends the Council approve the September 2026 Minutes. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
”I move to approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of September 9, 2026, the Regular Meeting of September 9, 2026, and the Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 25, 2026.”
NEW BUSINESS

9. APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. R2635 ADOPTING THE UPDATED ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR SPEED LIMITS (E&TS)
AND ESTABLISHING, RETAINING, MODIFYING, AND REDUCING
SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN THE CITY
Recommendation: Staff recommend that the City Council approve Resolution No. R2635 adopting the updated Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits (E&TS) prepared by Hartzog & Crabill, Inc., and establishing, retaining, modifying, and reducing speed limits on certain City streets consistent with E&TS recommendations and authorize staff to implement the approved speedlimit changes, including the installation, modification, or removal of applicable speedlimit signage consistent with the adopted Resolution and the E&TS recommendations. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
”I move to approve Resolution No. R2635 adopting the updated Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits (E&TS) prepared by Hartzog & Crabill, Inc., and establishing, retaining, modifying, and reducing speed limits on certain City streets consistent with E&TS recommendations and authorize staff to implement the approved speedlimit changes, including the installation, modification, or removal of applicable speedlimit signage consistent with the adopted Resolution and the E&TS recommendations.”
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS OR PUBLIC WRITINGS DISTRIBUTION
This is an opportunity to announce any written communications pertaining to the City received by members of the City Council. All public writings distributed by the City of San Marino to at least a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda will be made available at the Public Counter at City Hall located at 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino, California 91108, and will also be included in the public agenda packet that will available for review at the City Council meeting.

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

ADJOURNMENT
Posted: 10/09/2026 NIA CALISTRO
CITY CLERK
PAGE 5 of 358
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Nicole Tibbet, Community Engagement Manager
DATE: October 14, 2026
SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO WAIVE THE SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT COST

FOR THE SAN MARINO HIGH SCHOOL HOMECOMING
PARADE IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,030.22

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Safe Community
Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND
The San Marino High School Homecoming Parade is a long-standing tradition for the students at San Marino High School and the community as a whole who have long enjoyed the parade. This parade is held by the San Marino High School in conjunction with the School District and travels westbound along Huntington Drive from the High School, towards Ridgeway Road and then returns along eastbound Huntington Drive back to the campus. The parade has always required a close partnership between the City and the School District through a special event permit, as it requires the careful coordination of many City departments, public safety personnel, and outside agencies.

In an effort to address revenue shortfalls and ensure that those who require permits are not being subsidized by others who do not live within the community, the City Council adopted a new processing fee for special event permits, which took effect July 13, 2025. This meant that the previously free special event permit now carried a processing fee of $1,635 and additional fees for the staff time required to safely coordinate the event. Staff notified the parade coordinator of this new fee and the associated costs during the permitting process. Subsequently, the City received a request from SMUSD Superintendent De La Torre that year asking that the City Council consider waiving the fees associated with this permit. Additionally, the school district Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 6 of 358
has also requested the City waive all permitting and inspection fees associated with the fireworks display for the homecoming game.

In preparation for this year’s event, staff notified the school district of the processing fee of $1,685 and received a request again from Assistant Superintendent Choi to waive the processing fee and staff costs associated with the parade.

DISCUSSION
The parade is set to take place October 30 from approximately 3:00 PM to 4:30 PM. The attached permit details the route and logistics of the parade.

The $1,685 processing fee is inclusive of the following staff member’s review and authorization of the permit. These members review all special event permits for the City: City Manager, Community Engagement Manager, Police Chief, Fire Chief, Public Works Director, and the Community Development Director.

The following is a summary of additional anticipated staff time costs in addition to the administrative review:
• Police Department staffing for the parade includes the daytime patrol shift as well as personnel on overtime. There were a total of (2) Sergeants, (1) Detective, and (2) Officers on overtime for this event.

The overtime cost at the regular rate for a required (4) hour minimum totals: $2,287.93.
• Police Department also has (2) Commanders and (1) Sergeant responsible for preparing the traffic and staff staging plan. This staff time cost totals: $1,099.96.
• Fire Department staffing for the parade includes two
Firefighter/Paramedics who will drive old fire engine #1 at the request of the School District for 1.5 hours. This totals: $234.97.00. • Public Works staffing includes (1) Street Foreman, (1) Maintenance Worker 3, and (1) Maintenance Worker 2 at 4 hours of overtime. (1) Park Foreman, (1) Maintenance Worker 2 and (1) Maintenance Worker 1 at 3 hours of overtime and 1 hour of standard time. Deployment of signs and message boards also includes (1) Street Foreman and (1) Maintenance Worker 3 at 3 hours of standard time. This staff time cost totaled: $1,820.36
Additional impacts from the parade include:
• Equipment used by the City to facilitate the parade:
o Barricades and barriers provided by San Marino’s Public Works Department.
o The Police Department deploys traffic cones from our inventory.

PAGE 7 of 358
o (2) Public Works message boards and a truck with directional flashing pattern for cars traveling eastbound on Huntington Drive prior to San Marino Avenue.
o Use of City-owned and maintained detour signs.
• Rescue Ambulance 91 will be placed out of service to provide the driver for old fire engine #1. A Firefighter/Paramedic is required to drive the antique fire engine. This results in Rescue Ambulance 91 not being available for response in the city for the duration of the parade. • Metro Transit Authority special events coordinator will be notified to reroute bus route 179 in both east and west bound directions for the duration of the parade.

The fireworks permit costs $902 per the City’s fee schedule. This cost covers the review of the fireworks vendor, the plan, and inspection of the fireworks before launch.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
The total fiscal impact of waiving this fee is $8,030.22 in combined staff time and processing fees.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council waive the costs associated with the special event permit for the San Marino High School Homecoming Parade.

ATTACHMENTS

1. San Marino High School Homecoming Parade Special Event Permit PAGE 8 of 358
General Public Events
Name of Event: __________________________________________________________________ Name of Applicant (include Organization name if applicable): _________________________________ Phone Number: _______________________ Email: ____________________________________ Address (of Applicant): _____________________________________________________________

CITY OF SAN MARINO
Applicant Information
Please submit a PDF of this form to [email protected] 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino, CA 91108 • (626) 300-0700 Event Information

SPECIAL EVENT

APPLICATION
Date of Event: ____________________________________
Set Up Start Time: ___________________ Clean Up End Time: _________________________ Event Start Time: ____________________ Event End Time: ____________________________ Location of Event (include Address): ___________________________________________________ Property Owner Name(s): __________________________________________________________ Location Contact Name: ________________________ Location Contact Phone: ________________ Estimated Total Attendance: _________ Adults: _______ Children: _______ Is this event open to the public: _____ Yes _____ Yes, but with purchase entry _____ No, invite only Are you requesting street closure? (SMPD reserves the right to determine if necessary): ___ Yes ___ No Are you requesting parking restrictions, private or public spaces (must attach map): ___ Yes ___ No Are you requesting Co-Sponsorship from the City? _____ Yes _____ No Co-sponsorship by the City of San Marino is approved or denied by the City Council. The Applicant must describe any in-kind services (on a separate sheet) they are requesting from the City of San Marino. These services include the following:

Event Type:

Block Party Expressive Activity Spontaneous Event Private Event City staff time
Permit fees
Affecting Regular Use of Lacy Park
Event promotion using City media services
Facility rentals
San Marino High School -- Homecoming Parade Jose Caire -- San Marino High School 626-299-7045 [email protected] 2701 Huntington Drive, San Marino, Ca., 91108 ✔ 10/30/26 3:00pm 5:00pm 3:45pm 4:45pm Huntington Drive Between Gainsborough and Public Street Jose Caire 626-299-7045 150-200 100 100 ✔ ✔
✔
✔
PAGE 9 of 358
Element Y N Description (Include Quantity/Type/Etc.)
Food Served
Food Sold
Alcohol Served
Amplified Sound (DJ, Band, Speakers with Music, etc.)
Games with participant movement
Moving Vehicles
Generators
Carnival Rides
Carnival Games
Food Vendors
Food Trucks
Portable Restrooms
AV Equipment
Jumper/Bounce House
Temporary Tents (Permit Required)
Canopies (10x10 or smaller)
Fundraising or Donation Requests

CITY OF SAN MARINO

SPECIAL EVENT

APPLICATION
Event Elements, please mark "Yes" or "No" for each. You must provide a description for all elements marked "Yes", use additional pages if needed.

Additional fees, permits, and restrictions may be imposed based off of the information received. All vendors hired to conduct business in the City MUST have a City of San Marino Business License. Contact Community Development for more information on Business Licenses, (626) 300-0712.

Please submit a PDF of this form to [email protected] 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino, CA 91108 • (626) 300-0700 ✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
PAGE 10 of 358
PAGE 11 of 358
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Amber Shah, Parks & Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: October 14, 2026
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. R-26-34 AUTHORIZING

SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF RESOURCES RECYCLING AND

RECOVERY (CALRECYCLE) FOR THE RUBBERIZED

PAVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND
The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) administers the Rubberized Pavement Grant Program to promote the use of rubberized pavement materials and the beneficial reuse of Californiagenerated waste tires. The program provides grant funding for eligible roadway projects utilizing Rubberized Asphalt Concrete (RAC) Hot-Mix and Rubberized Chip Seal (RCS).

The City is eligible to apply for funding under CalRecycle's Fiscal Year 2026– 27 Rubberized Pavement Grant Program. The program allows an individual applicant to include multiple eligible projects within a single application that will occur during the grant term. As part of the grant application process, CalRecycle requires the City's governing body to authorize submission of the grant application and identify the City officials authorized to execute documents necessary to secure and administer the grant.

Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 12 of 358

DISCUSSION
Staff propose to use CalRecycle Rubberized Pavement Grant Program funds for two street rehabilitation projects on various City-owned, publicly accessible roadway segments identified through the City's Pavement Management Program. The projects will use Rubberized Asphalt Concrete (RAC) Hot-Mix to rehabilitate eligible roadway segments throughout the City. These projects represent the first two-year cycle of a new biennial pavement strategy that combines more intensive roadway rehabilitation with a preventative maintenance approach. The two projects will be implemented across multiple fiscal years, with the first project proposed for construction in Fiscal Year 2026–27 and the second project proposed for construction in Fiscal Year 2028–29.

The first street rehabilitation project is currently in design and includes roadway segments along Huntington Drive, Kenilworth Avenue, Lorain Road, Oak Knoll Avenue, Ridgeway Road, Roanoke Road, Virginia Road, and Westhaven Road. Based on the City's pavement design recommendations and CalRecycle's calculation methodology, the project is estimated to require approximately 7,136 tons of RAC Hot-Mix. The grant project calculation provides a reimbursement rate of $15 per ton, resulting in an estimated grant amount of $107,040.

The second street rehabilitation project is proposed for construction in Fiscal Year 2028–29, and must be completed no later than April 1, 2029 in order to be eligible to receive grant funds. The project is estimated to require approximately 10,704 tons of RAC hot-mix. At the applicable reimbursement rate of $15 per ton, the estimated grant amount for the second project is $160,560.

Together, the two projects are estimated to utilize approximately 17,840 tons of RAC hot-mix, resulting in a total requested grant amount of $267,600. The tonnage estimates are based on the pavement design recommendations and calculation methodology included in the City's CalRecycle Project Summary and Calculation. The FY 2026–27 project includes approximately 527,990 square feet of roadway improvements and utilizes RAC-1 material consisting of an Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM).

All rubberized material will use crumb rubber derived solely from Californiagenerated waste tires processed in California, meeting the Program's minimum binder specification of 300 pounds of tire-derived crumb rubber per ton of RAC hot-mix (15 percent by weight). The proposed projects will advance the City's Pavement Management Program by rehabilitating eligible roadway segments while incorporating recycled-content paving materials.

PAGE 13 of 358
The projects are also consistent with the City's biennial pavement strategy, which is intended to combine roadway rehabilitation with preventative maintenance to support the long-term condition and serviceability of the City's roadway network. Adoption of the proposed resolution will authorize staff to submit the City's CalRecycle grant application and authorize the City Manager and/or Parks and Public Works Director/City Engineer to execute the grant application, grant agreement, amendments, requests for payment, and other documents necessary to secure and administer the grant funds.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
The City is requesting a total of $267,600 in CalRecycle Rubberized Pavement Grant Program funding for two street rehabilitation projects spanning multiple fiscal years. Based on the City's Project Summary and Calculation, the FY 2026–27 project is estimated at 7,136 tons of RAC hot-mix and is eligible for approximately $107,040 in grant funding. The FY 2028–29 project is estimated at 10,704 tons of RAC hot-mix and is eligible for approximately $160,560 in grant funding. The combined requested grant amount is $267,600. The Rubberized Pavement Grant Program does not require a local funding match. Grant funding is provided on a reimbursement basis for eligible project costs incurred in accordance with the grant agreement and program requirements.

The first project is anticipated to be constructed during Fiscal Year 2026–27, and the second project is anticipated to be constructed during Fiscal Year 2028–29. Grant-funded work must comply with the applicable CalRecycle grant term, approved Project Summary and Calculation, and all program requirements. Any project costs that are not eligible for reimbursement or exceed the awarded grant amount would be funded through the City's existing pavement rehabilitation funding and/or other authorized funding sources and contingent upon budget appropriation by the City Council.

There is no procurement action associated with submission of the grant application. Any future construction contracts, professional services, or purchases associated with the proposed street rehabilitation projects will be subject to the City's applicable procurement requirements.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

PAGE 14 of 358

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. R-26-34, authorizing submittal of an application to the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) for the Rubberized Pavement Grant Program and authorizing the City Manager and/or Parks and Public Works Director/City Engineer to execute grant-related documents necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project(s).

If the City Council concurs with staff's recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to adopt Resolution No. R-26-34 authorizing submittal of an application to the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) for the Rubberized Pavement Grant Program, and authorizing the City Manager and/or Parks and Public Works Director/City Engineer to execute grant-related documents necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project(s).”

ATTACHMENTS

1. Draft Resolution No. R-26-34
PAGE 15 of 358
RESOLUTION NO. R-26-34

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN

MARINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF

APPLICATION(S) FOR ALL CALRECYCLE GRANTS FOR WHICH THE

CITY OF SAN MARINO IS ELIGIBLE
WHEREAS, the California Public Resources Code authorizes the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to administer various Grant Programs; and WHEREAS, in furtherance of this authority, CalRecycle is required to establish procedures governing the administration of the Grant Programs; and WHEREAS, CalRecycle grant application procedures require, among other things, an applicant’s governing body to declare by resolution certain authorizations related to the administration of CalRecycle Grants.

WHEREAS, in furtherance of this authority, CalRecycle is required to establish procedures governing the administration of the Grant Programs; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Marino, California as follows:

SECTION 1. The City Council authorizes the submittal of application(s) to CalRecycle for the Rubberized Pavement Grant Program
SECTION 2. The City Manager and/or Parks and Public Works Director/City Engineer are hereby authorized as Signature Authority to execute in the name of the City of San Marino all grant documents, including but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, and requests for payment, necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project.

SECTION 3. That these authorizations are effective five (5) years from the date of adoption of this resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, at a meeting of the City Council of the City of San Marino, California, on this 14th day of October, 2026.

TONY CHOU, MAYOR

ATTEST:

NIA CALISTRO, CITY CLERK
PAGE 16 of 358
CITY OF SAN MARINO RESOLUTION NO. R-26-34

Page 2 of 2 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.

CITY OF SAN MARINO )
I, Nia Calistro, City Clerk of the City of San Marino, California, hereby certify that Resolution No. R-26-34 was adopted by the City Council of the City of San Marino at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of October, 2026, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________________

NIA CALISTRO, CITY CLERK

CITY OF SAN MARINO
PAGE 17 of 358
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Hillary Guirola-Leon, Finance Director
Corey Mize, Accounting Manager/Controller
DATE: October 14, 2026
SUBJECT: COMMITMENT OF DONATIONS FUND YEAR-END

BALANCE RESERVES

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
Inviting and Relevant City Facilities

BACKGROUND
Governmental Accounting Standards Board ("GASB") Statement No. 54 defines five specific classifications of fund balance for funds categorized as governmental funds. (All of the City’s individual funds are categorized as governmental funds, except for the Capitalized Equipment and Agency Funds.) The five fund balance classifications are intended to identify whether the specific components of fund balance are available for appropriation and are therefore "spendable." The classifications also are intended to identify the extent to which fund balance is constrained by special restrictions, if any.

Applicable only to governmental funds, the five classifications of fund balance are as follows:

Classifications Nature of Restriction
Non-spendable Cannot be readily converted to cash
Restricted Externally imposed restrictions
Committed City Council imposed commitment
Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 18 of 358
Assigned City Manager assigned purpose/intent
Unassigned Residual balance not otherwise
restricted/committed/assigned
Committed fund balance: That portion of a fund balance that includes amounts that can only be used for specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by formal action by the government's highest level of decision-making authority, and remain binding unless removed in the same manner. The City considers a resolution to constitute a formal action for the purposes of establishing a committed fund balance. The action to constrain resources must occur within the fiscal reporting period; however the amount can be determined subsequently.

DISCUSSION
On September 28, 2018, the City Council adopted the City's Donations Policy.

The Policy requires appropriate accounting and internal controls over donations activity, especially within the Donations Fund which is a component of the General Fund. The Policy also provides that properly documented excess or deficit annual collections can be carried between years on the City's accounting records. This will satisfy the intention of our donors that we apply their donations to intended purposes even if transactions cross fiscal years.

In October 2025, the City Council reaffirmed the committed fund balance of $342,895 as of June 30, 2025. The $342,895 was reported as committed fund balance of the General Fund on the City’s audited Annual Comprehensive Financial Report at June 30, 2026 as a result of this Council action. (The Donations Fund is combined with the General Fund on the City’s audited Annual Comprehensive Financial Report.)
To be consistent and for maximum transparency, the year-end figures of the Donations Fund are being presented to the City Council again this year for review and to authorize the Finance Department to commit these balances as of June 30, 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
If approved, the committed balance would decrease by $5,884 from last year’s balance of $342,895 that was approved at the October 31, 2025 City Council meeting. The committed balance is $337,011 and is shown below:

PAGE 19 of 358
See Attachment 1 for a breakdown of this committed balance by City activity.

This report requires no procurement review.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the accompanying resolution to commit the balance as of June 30, 2026 as noted in the attachments. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to adopt Resolution No. R-26-32 to commit the balance of $337,011 in the Donations Fund as of June 30, 2026.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. Committed balance by City Activity

2. Committed Fund Balances from Audited Annual Comprehensive Financial Report as of June 30, 2025

3. Resolution No. R-26-32
Balance at Balance at
6/30/2025 Donations/Interest Expenditures 6/30/2026
Community Development Projects 92,648 2,965$ -$ 95,614
Public Safety 46,256 38,746 (25,000) 60,002
Parks and Recreation 87,586 13,953 (13,301) 88,239
Library 116,405 69,942 (93,190) 93,156
Total 342,895$ 125,607$ (131,491)$ 337,011
PAGE 20 of 358
ATTACHMENT 1
Balance at Balance at
6/30/2025 Donations/Interest Expenditures 6/30/2026
Community Development Projects
Centennial Fountain 92,648 2,965 - 95,613
Public Safety
Police Department 41,960 6,608 - 48,568
Public Safety Family Assist 108 3 - 111
Fire Department 4,188 32,134 (25,000) 11,322
46,256 38,746 (25,000) 60,002
Parks and Recreation
Patrick's Tree 7,817 250 - 8,067
Lacy Park - 8,500 (8,500) -
Parklet 2,045 65 - 2,110
War Memorial 50,997 1,932 - 52,929
Recreation 14,393 811 - 15,204
Track Meet & Memorial Day & 4th of July 8,624 2,276 (4,801) 6,099 Preschool 3,710 119 - 3,829
87,586 13,953 (13,301) 88,239
Library
Library Administration 17,094 1,240 - 18,334
Crain Art Gallery 21,786 1,217 (527) 22,477
Adult Services 47,763 26,533 (41,877) 32,418
Children's Services 29,762 40,953 (50,786) 19,928
116,405 69,942 (93,190) 93,157
Grand Total 342,895 125,607 (131,491) 337,011
PAGE 21 of 358
PAGE 22 of 358
RESOLUTION NO. R-26-32

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN

MARINO, APPROVING COMMITMENT OF FUND BALANCES IN

THE DONATIONS FUND
WHEREAS, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) has issued Statement No. 54 establishing a hierarchy of fund balances as follows:
• Non-Spendable Fund Balance – Amounts that are not in a spendable form or are required to be maintained intact. Examples are inventory, pre-paid expenses, and revolving cash fund amounts.
• Restricted Fund Balance – Amounts that can be spent only for the specific purposes stipulated by external resource providers (such as grantors), or enabling legislation.

Restrictions may be changed or lifted only with the consent of the resource providers. • Committed Fund Balance – Amounts subject to internal constraints self-imposed by the City’s highest level of decision-making authority. Commitments may be changed or lifted only by the City Council taking the same formal action that imposed the constraint originally.
• Assigned Fund Balance – Amounts the City intends to use for a specific purpose.

Assignments may be established by the City Manager or by a designee of the City Manager.
• Unassigned Fund Balance – Amounts representing the residual balance in the General Fund that has not been assigned to other funds and that are not in the other classifications.; and
WHEREAS, GASB Statement No. 54 further clarifies the constraints that govern how a governmental entity can use and designate amounts reported as fund balance and stipulates that the Fund Balance can only be Committed by action of the highest level of decision-making authority of the governmental entity; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is the highest level of decision-making authority, and has the authority to commit, assign, or evaluate existing fund balance classifications and identify the intended uses of committed or assigned funds pursuant to City Policy; and WHEREAS, the committed fund balance classification reflects amounts subject to internal constraints self-imposed by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, once the committed fund balance constraints are imposed it requires the constraint to be removed by the City Council prior to redirecting the funds for other purposes; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARINO, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE THAT in accordance with the provisions of GASB 54, hereby commits the following portions of fund balances, as indicated by the Committed Fund Balance classification, and funds cannot be used for PAGE 23 of 358
CITY OF SAN MARINO RESOLUTION NO. R-26-32

PAGE TWO
any purpose other than directed below, unless the City Council adopts another resolution to remove or change the constraint:
• The ending balance in the Donations Fund (Fund 281) at June 30, 2026, in the amount of $337,011.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of San Marino, California, on this 14th day of October, 2026.

TONY CHOU
MAYOR
ATTEST:

NIA CALISTRO

CITY CLERK

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.

CITY OF SAN MARINO )
I, NIA CALISTRO City Clerk of the City of San Marino, California, hereby certify that Resolution No R-26-32 was adopted by the City Council of the City of San Marino at a Regular Meeting held on the 14th day of October, 2026, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

NIA CALISTRO

CITY CLERK
PAGE 24 of 358
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Nicole Tibbet, Community Engagement Manager
DATE: October 14, 2026
SUBJECT: REPORT ON REQUEST FOR SUPPORT OF LORAIN ROAD

HALLOWEEN ACTIVITIES

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Engaged and Connected Residents
Safe Community
Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government
Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services

BACKGROUND
At the September 25, 2026 City Council meeting, the City Council requested a future agenda item in response to a request from two residents residing on Lorain Road, to look into options to support the community experience on Halloween along the Lorain Road neighborhood. Each year on Halloween, the neighborhood along Lorain Road receives a large number of visitors for trickor-treating due to the impressive nature of the decorations and displays among other reasons. The residents expressed concerns over the crowds and traffic control in the area particularly in light of Halloween taking place on a Saturday this year.

The residents initially met with Police Chief Incontro and Fire Chief Rueda prior to making their request to the City Council. After fielding initial inquiries, City staff thoroughly investigated options for neighborhood support to the area.

Following the City Council meeting the residents held a subsequent meeting with City Manager Eskandar and Parks and Public Works Director Shah to discuss ideas, resource needs, and community impacts.

The the specific ideas that were researched and discussed included:

Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 25 of 358
• Closure of Lorain Road and adjacent roads at various lengths • Various parking restrictions and related enforcement
• Various configurations of additional temporary equipment in the area

DISCUSSION
After review and discussion with the requesting residents, several impacts to the community were identified that could not be reasonably mitigated when considering options such as road closures or parking restrictions. As such, the residents made the choice to not pursue any road closures or parking restrictions along Lorain Road. Instead, they requested that the City continue with providing additional temporary equipment in the area where possible as has been done in recent years.

Below is a small but not exhaustive list of the impacts discussed during the research of the request as it relates to each option:

Road Closures
Any stretch of road closure on Lorain would result in the need for:
• Extensive traffic control plan developed and implemented by a contract traffic engineering and traffic control company.
• Hundreds of road closure and traffic control notices would need to be mailed to the impacted residents and greater community. • Additional rented equipment to enforce road closure to the area – including reinforced barricades, lighting, etc.
• Road closure points would need to be attended to by staff or residents to ensure that the road could be opened for emergency response vehicle access.
• Residents would not be able to enter the area for an extended period of time and thus impact their ability to have guests/parking.

Parking Restrictions
• Parking restriction notices mailed to immediate affected streets and surrounding neighborhoods as parking restrictions will lead to displaced parking for residents and guests.
• Additional enforcement resources for ticketing and/or towing for noncompliance. • The lack of parked vehicles may have unintended consequences on the flow of traffic through the neighborhood.

Overall Considerations
• Any measure of road closures or parking restrictions would have a significant impact on residents in the closed areas and well beyond, for most of the holiday date, making access to their homes by themselves PAGE 26 of 358
or guests very difficult. Extensive community dialogue and outreach would be necessary to ensure that the impacted residents are well aware of the closures to plan their own events accordingly.
• Road closures or parking restrictions may lead to a false sense of security encouraging visitors to walk in streets or areas that they generally should not.
• While costs were not the highest consideration in this thought process, there would be significant costs for either intervention strategy.

Additionally, it is important to note that the City generally does not approve road closure/block party requests on holidays due to personnel limitations and impact these requests have on available resources.

After reviewing the impacts, the residents decided not to move forward with their road closure requests this year, given the limited timeline to properly engage the community and the potential neighborhood impacts. If the City Council wishes to revisit this in the future, the appropriate time to provide direction to staff would be during the budget process, given the impacts on operations and associated costs that these avenues are anticipated to create.

While not moving forward with road closures or parking restrictions, staff will deploy changeable message boards to ensure awareness in the area, as well as deploy light towers at strategic locations to provide additional visibility.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council receive and file this staff report.

If City Council agrees with staff’s recommendation, the appropriate motion would be, “I move to receive and file the staff report on the Lorain Road Halloween requests.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. None
PAGE 27 of 358
J
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
DATE: October 14, 2026
SUBJECT: REPORT ON EMERGENCY ACTIONS TAKEN TO
REPAIR/REMEDIATE FIRE STATION 91 AND REQUEST TO

EXTEND EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT PURSUANT TO
PUBLIC CONTRACTS CODE SECTION 22050 AND SAN
MARINO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.06.05(A)(8)

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Efficient, Responsive and Effective City Services
Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND
Fire Station 91, San Marino’s sole Fire Station is an essential public safety facility located within the City of San Marino that houses firefighting apparatus, emergency medical equipment, and fire personnel who provide emergency response services to the residents and businesses of the City. The facility is critical to the City's ability to deliver uninterrupted fire suppression and emergency medical response capabilities to the community.

City staff recently discovered that a long-term water leak within the Fire Station has caused significant and extensive water damage to the structure.

The damage includes deterioration of walls, flooring, electrical systems, and other building components critical to the continued safe operation of the fire station.

Upon discovery of the water damage, the City Manager, acting pursuant to the authority delegated under San Marino Municipal Code Section Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
John Chou, Council Member
Hunter Chang, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 28 of 358

04.03.02(A), proclaimed a public emergency in connection with the water damage at the Fire Station and authorized immediate actions to assess, remediate, and repair the damage. Section 02.06.05(A)(8) of the San Marino Municipal Code delegates to the City Manager the power to proclaim a public emergency, as defined in Public Contract Code Section 1102, to immediately take all actions directly required by the emergency, to procure needed goods, services, and public projects, and to contract for public projects without informal or formal bidding.

At the April 24, 2026, City Council meeting, the City Council unanimously approved Resolution No. R-26-08, ratifying the City Manager’s proclamation of emergency and authorizing emergency procurement of construction and other related services to repair/remediate Fire Station 91. That resolution and governing law require that a report on progress be provided at each Council meeting and a decision be made as to whether to extend the emergency proclamation to facilitate continued emergency procurement.

DISCUSSION
Since the Council’s action, staff have been working with the City’s insurer, the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CJPIA) and their designees to carry out the remediation and repair work. The following work is currently in various stages of progress:
- Executed and completed an initial contract with ServePro for initial response, assessment, and rental equipment. Final invoice is pending. - Executed and completed a contract with Enviro Check for a variety of biological testing services. Cost for services was $2,590.00. - Executed a contract with Mobile Modular for the rental of temporary office and housing facilities for the Fire Department personnel. The facilities are expected to be delivered to the Civic Center during the week of May 11th. Current cost estimate is $44,245.51.
- Executed a contract with BluSky Restoration Contractors, LLC for insurance covered remediation and demolition work. Final cost is $423,780.65.
- Negotiating a scope of work and contract with BluSky Restoration Contractors, LLC for repair work. Costs are unknown at this time. - Executed a contract with Griffin Structures for construction management services to oversee the work of BluSky Restoration Contractors, LLC.

Current cost estimate is $58,721.
- The City’s Information Technology (IT) servicer SDI is fulfilling the various IT needs related to the move out of the Fire Station and into the temporary facilities. Costs are unknown at this time.

PAGE 29 of 358
- Executed and completed a contract with Westnet for fire personnel alerting equipment installation. Current cost estimate is $18,651.06. - Executed a contract with The Lavatory for additional temporary shower and restroom trailer facilities for fire personnel. Current cost estimate is $9,265.88.
- Executed and completed a second contract with Enviro Check for asbestos testing services. Cost for services was approximately $900. - Executed and completed a contract with Olfati Design Group for the perpetration of architectural and structural engineering plans. Cost for services was $26,800.00
- Negotiated and preparing to execute a contract with SOCTEC for geotechnical and environmental testing related to the foundation, soils, and concrete work. Current cost estimate is $9,624.00.
- Approved an invoice from Blue Sky Restoration covering the work performed related to building code and seismic upgrades. Invoice was for a total of $377,362 which was paid for by the City’s insurer.

Below is a summary table of the cost details above. If the cost is not listed, it is unknown or not finalized as of the date of this report.:

Provider Description Insurance
Responsibility
City
Responsibility
ServPro Water damage remediation
EnviroCheck Environmental testing $2,590.00
Mobile Modular Mobile housing and office units $44,245.51 Blue Sky Restoration Mitigation, demolition, moving,
etc.
$423,780.65
Blue Sky Restoration Mold abatement $58,171.19
Griffin Structures Construction management
services
$58,721.00
SDI Information technology services
Westnet Response alerting equipment
services
$18,651.06
The Lavatory Temporary restroom facilities $9,265.88
EnviroCheck Environmental testing $900.00
Olfati Design Group Architect and engineering
services
$26,800.00
Control Fire & Security Plumbing repairs $17,950.00
Blue Sky Restoration Rebuilding
SOCOTEC Geotechnical and
environmental testing
$9,624.00
PAGE 30 of 358
Blue Sky Restoration Building Code Upgrade Repairs $377,362.00 Running Totals $971,940.10 $76,121.19
As of the writing of this report, all of the seismic work, foundation and framing repairs, subfloor work, and drywall repairs are now completed. Finished flooring and tilework are to begin this week with cabinetry arriving mid-month, followed by painting, with an anticipated project completion the first week of November.

It is unknown at this time whether additional emergency procurements will be required for the restoration work at Fire Station 91, but staff anticipates having a better understanding in that regard as repair activity progresses and undertaking the standard procurement procedures will unnecessarily delay repair and remediation of Fire Station 91. Accordingly, it is recommended that the Council determine that the emergency action approved in Resolution No.

R-26-08 be continued to facilitate expeditious repair and restoration of the Fire Station.

Ongoing Review Requirements
Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22050(c) and San Marino Municipal Code Section 02.06.05(A)(8), the City Council must review the emergency action at each regularly scheduled meeting and determine, by a four-fifths (4/5) vote, whether there is a need to continue the emergency action and whether that work should continue without the benefit of informal or formal bidding. The City Council shall terminate the emergency action at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant so that the remainder of the emergency action may be completed by giving notice for bids to let contracts. Staff will report to the City Council on the status of the emergency project at its next regularly scheduled meeting and at each regular meeting thereafter, as required by the Public Contract Code, until the repairs are completed.

Environmental Analysis
The emergency repairs to Fire Station 91 are categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and Section 15269 (Emergency Projects).

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
PAGE 31 of 358
The full cost of the emergency repair work at Fire Station 91 is not yet known and will depend upon the scope of remediation required once a full assessment of the water damage has been completed. The City Manager will negotiate contracts with qualified contractors and vendors necessary to assess, remediate, and repair the damage. Even though there is no formal bid process required in emergency projects, the City Manager will make reasonable efforts to obtain competitive pricing where feasible and consistent with the urgency of the emergency. All contracts entered into pursuant to the Resolution shall be subject to applicable prevailing wage requirements. Staff will provide the City Council with regular updates on expenditures incurred pursuant to the Resolution at each regularly scheduled meeting.

While the total costs of the emergency repair work are unknown at this time, the City anticipates a significant portion to be covered by the City’s property insurance policies with the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority subject to the City’s coverage limits. At a minimum, the City expects to be responsible for the insurance policy’s deductible of $15,000. Expenses not covered by insurance will be paid for out of the City’s General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance (Reserves).

As of the date of this report, in addition to a few miscellaneous expenses, two invoices for work completed were the responsibility of the City. The City Council appropriated $100,000 to pay for those invoices and expenses at the September 9, 2026 City Council meeting.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council receive the report of repair/remediation actions undertaken to date and extend the emergency by a 4/5 vote to facilitate expeditious restoration of Fire Station 91. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
"I move to 1) receive and file the report of repair/remediation actions undertaken to date and 2) extend the emergency action approved in Resolution No. R-26-08 to facilitate the expeditious restoration of Fire Station

91."

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. R-26-08
PAGE 32 of 358
PAGE 33 of 358
PAGE 34 of 358
PAGE 35 of 358
PAGE 36 of 358
PAGE 37 of 358
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Clarice Dai, City Treasurer
DATE: October 14, 2026
SUBJECT: CASH AND INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF
AUGUST 2026

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND
The City of San Marino’s Investment Policy adopted by the City Council on April 10, 2024, Section 16.0, Reporting, stipulates that the Treasurer shall review and render monthly reports to the City Council of all cash and investments held by the City. The report shall include the following information for all cash accounts and bank deposits:
• Balance at the end of the month
• Interest rate (for all interest-bearing active deposits) The report shall include the following information for all investments:
• A listing of individual securities held at the end of the month, by security type;
• Issuer, date of maturity, date of purchase, par and the dollar amount invested;
• Coupon, discount or earnings rate; and
Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 38 of 358
• Current market value as of the date of the report and the source of this same valuation; and
• The weighted average maturity and weighted average yield of all investments combined.

The above information may be submitted in the form of copies of statements received by the custodial institution. For investments with LAIF, the most recent statement or statements received from the State Treasurer may be included in the monthly report in lieu of the information noted above. The report shall include a listing of all investment transactions for the month (Government Code Section 53607). The report must also include a statement of compliance of the portfolio to the statement of investment policy, or manner in which the portfolio is not in compliance, as well as a statement denoting the ability of the local agency to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months, or an explanation as to why sufficient money shall, or may, not be available (Government Code Section 53646). Reports shall be rendered to the City Council and City Manager within 30 days following the end of the month of the period covered by the report.

DISCUSSION

PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
The City maintains petty cash on City facilities, cash in bank, cash in a transactional investment account, deposits with the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF), two Section 115 Trusts, investments in negotiable Certificates of Deposit, investments in Municipal Securities, and investments in U.S.

Government Agency Securities. All items are detailed in the attachment to this report. A summary of portfolio content is found below. The attachment to this report offers specific detail on each category of investment.

PAGE 39 of 358

PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE
As of 08/31/26, the annual percentage yield earned on the bank IMMA is

2.78%. The effective yield for LAIF deposits is 3.863%. The average yield on CDs is 4.05%. The average yield on US Government Agency Securities is

1.6%. Total combined portfolio yield for August 2026 is 3.31%.

Allocation
Petty Cash on City Premises 1,397$ 0%
Cash in Bank-checking accounts 5,026,754 17%
Cash in Bank-IMMA 10,660,001 35%
CERBT Section 115 Trust 900,000 3%
CEPPT Section 115 Trust 1,500,000 5%
Deposits with LAIF 9,502,444 32%
Certificates of Deposit 1,962,000 7%
Treasury Obligations - 0%
US Government Agency Securities 500,000 2%
Municipal Securities - 0%
Cash and Investments 30,052,595$ 100%
Cash and Investments Portfolio Summary
City of San Marino
2024 2025 2026
Jan 4.012 4.366 3.931
Feb 4.122 4.333 3.871
Mar 4.232 4.313 3.826
Apr 4.272 4.281 3.811
May 4.332 4.272 3.810
Jun 4.48 4.269 3.816
Jul 4.516 4.258 3.840
Aug 4.579 4.251 3.863
Sep 4.575 4.212
Oct 4.518 4.150
Nov 4.477 4.096
Dec 4.434 4.025
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
Average Monthly Effective Yields
PAGE 40 of 358

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
There is no fiscal impact and procurement review is not applicable.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Council receive and file this report. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to receive and file the Cash and Investment Report for the Month of August 2026.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. Treasurer’s Report as of August 31,2026
2024 2025 2026
Jan $39,122,223 $38,498,486 $32,900,183
Feb $38,930,344 $37,958,423 $33,247,398
Mar $37,428,779 $32,575,434 $30,984,162
Apr $42,745,381 $36,992,117 $37,566,980
May $45,009,003 $38,813,591 $39,943,568
Jun $43,336,679 $36,874,092 $38,691,412
Jul $36,943,792 $29,078,254 $30,922,689
Aug $35,154,415 $27,945,761 $30,052,595
Sep $34,014,793 $26,345,855
Oct $31,862,773 $24,401,895
Nov $30,699,222 $23,558,742
Dec $38,226,238 $30,560,577
Total Cash and Investments
PAGE 41 of 358
Maturity Par Bank Market
Deposit/Investment Type Bank/Issuer Date Value Balance Value Rate Cash on Premises
Petty Cash & Cash Drawer City Hall 522.77 522.77 522.77 Petty Cash Fire Department 300.00 300.00 300.00
Petty Cash & Cash Drawer Recreation Department 100.00 100.00 100.00 Petty Cash & Cash Drawer Library 324.20 324.20 324.20
Petty Cash & Cash Drawer Lacy Park 150.00 150.00 150.00 Petty Cash Police Department -
1,397 1,397 1,397
Cash in Bank-checking accounts
Investment Transaction Interest Account BMO Bank 205-XXX-X 250,879 250,879 250,879 General Operating East West Bank-00-811xx753 4,775,875 4,775,875 4,775,875 Payroll (ZBA) East West Bank-00-811xx761 - - -
Worker's Compensation (ZBA) East West Bank-00-811xx779 - - - Sub total 5,026,754 5,026,754 5,026,754
- -
Cash in Bank-money market account
Money Market East West Bank-00-811xx787 10,660,001 10,660,001 10,660,001 2.78% Total Cash in Bank 15,686,754 15,686,754 15,686,754
Maturity Par Book Market
Deposit/Investment Type Bank/Issuer Date Value Value Value Rate Investments
Pooled Funds California Employers' Retiree Benefit Trust (CERBT) 900,000 900,000 1,161,067 Pooled Funds California Employers' Pension Prefunding Trust (CEPPT) 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,850,002 Pooled Funds State of California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 9,502,444 9,502,444 9,491,728 3.86% BMO Bank Safekeeping State Bank of India CUSIP #856285XL0 (FDIC #33682) 09/28/26 248,000 248,000 247,449 1.15% BMO Bank Safekeeping Citibank NA CUSIP #17312Q4A4 (FDIC #7213) 09/29/26 243,000 243,000 243,095 5.10% BMO Bank Safekeeping Morgan Stanley Bank NA CUSIP #61773TDG5 (FDIC #32992) 04/20/27 246,000 246,000 244,094 2.75% BMO Bank Safekeeping Popular BK New York BRH IN CUSIP#73317ADB5 (FDIC #34967) 06/07/27 245,000 245,000 246,521 4.80% BMO Bank Safekeeping Morgan Stanley Private BK NATL CUSIP#61768E4S9 (FDIC #34221) 06/07/27 245,000 245,000 246,656 4.90% BMO Bank Safekeeping Medallion BK Utah CUSIP#58404DVG3 (FDIC #57449) 06/21/27 245,000 245,000 246,460 4.75% BMO Bank Safekeeping BNY Mellon NA INSTL CTF DEP CUSIP#05584CPT7 (FDIC #7946) 06/20/28 245,000 245,000 246,240 4.50% BMO Bank Safekeeping Sallie Mae Bank Murray Utah CD CUSIP#795451DK6 (FDIC #58177) 07/17/29 245,000 245,000 245,840 4.50% 1,962,000 1,962,000 1,966,356 4.05%
Treasury Obligations
None None - - - 0.00%
US Government Agency Securities
BMO Bank Safekeeping Federal Farm Credit Bank CUSIP #3133ENHC7 12/14/26 500,000 500,000 496,550 1.600% 500,000 500,000 496,550 1.600%
2,462,000 2,462,000 2,462,906
Total Cash & Investments 30,052,595 30,052,595 30,653,855 3.32% I hereby certify that this report is in compliance with the City’s Investment Policy as adopted by the City Council on April 10, 2024, and the source of market valuation is obtained from various bank City of San Marino
As of August 31, 2026
Treasurer's Report
PAGE 42 of 358
Maturity Par Bank Market
City of San Marino
As of August 31, 2026
Treasurer's Report
Clarice Dai , City Treasurer
Clarice Dai , City Treasurer
statements, the monthly CERBT, CEPPT & LAIF statements and the investment safekeeping account statement with US Bank. The City has the ability to meet its expenditure requirements for the next six months.

PAGE 43 of 358
LAIF
Date Type of Transaction Amount Notes
No transactions this month
East West Bank Money Market Account
Date Type of Transaction Amount Notes
8/12/2026 Transfer from BMO 504,000
BMO Bank Safekeeping
Date Type of Transaction Amount Notes
8/12/2026 Transfer to Money Market Account (504,000)
8/13/2026 Synchrony Bank CUSIP #87164WA24 (FDIC #27314) Matured 248,000 Security Matured CalPERS CERBT Trust
Date Type of Transaction Amount Notes
No transactions this month
CalPERS CEPPT Trust
Date Type of Transaction Amount Notes
No transactions this month
PAGE 44 of 358
Institution:

Weekly as of Date:

Signature Date
Name and Title
Weekly Call Report Certification
Local Agency Security Program
Two authorized officers are required to executed the Weekly Call Report pursuant to CCR§16005.1.1(a).

The authorized signers of East West Bank each declares, for himself or herself alone and not for the other: I hereby verify that I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth in the Weekly Call Report (as of 09/16/2026) submitted pursuant to GC§ 53663(b) and CCR§16005.4.2 to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information contained therein is true and correct.

Name and Title
Yi Liu, VP-Financial Quantitative Analyst
East West Bank
9/16/2026
Signature Date
Lily Li, VP- Assistant Treasury Operation Manager
09/17/2026 09/17/2026
PAGE 45 of 358
$ 680,000,000.00
Excess/Deficiency in Pledged Collateral: $ 52,421,750.74 Preparer Name:

Preparer Title:

Preparer Phone #:

Preparer Email Address:

Shan Xu
Treasury Analyst II
Market Value of Pledged Securities as of
Weekly Report Date: $ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 680,000,000.00
$ 52,421,750.74
Agent of Depository:

VP- Assistant Treasury Operation Manager
VP-Financial Quantitative Analyst
Authorizer #1 Name:

Authorizer #2 Name:

Authorizer #1 Title:

Authorizer #2 Title:

Lily Li
Yi Liu
6267686949
[email protected]
Description of Other Deposits:

Federal Home Loan Bank of San
Francisco
Minimum Collateral Required:
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 597,693,570.72
$ 627,578,249.26
$ - $ 597,693,570.72
$ -
$ -
$ -
Less: Other (Specify on Line 17):

Total Secured Deposits:
$ 627,578,249.26
$ -
$ -
$ 488,670,385.28
$ 1,211,304,372.43
$ 124,940,416.43
$ -
$ -
$ 488,670,385.28
$ 1,211,304,372.43
$ 124,940,416.43
Less: CDAR Deposits:
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total Deposits & Accrued Interest:

Less: Deposits Subject to Waivers:

Less: Interest:

Less: Uncollected Funds:
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
Total
Mailing Address:

Weekly Report As of Date:
135 N Los Robles Ave, 8th Floor , Pasadena, CA 91101
9/16/2026 Submission Date: 9/17/2026
Pool #1 (x110%) Pool #2 (x150%) Pool #3 (x105%)
Weekly Call Report
Local Agency Security Program
California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation Institution Name: East West Bank CID #: 194
PAGE 46 of 358
PAGE 47 of 358
PAGE 48 of 358
PAGE 49 of 358
PAGE 50 of 358
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Hillary Guirola-Leon, Finance Director
Corey Mize, Accounting Manager/Controller
DATE: October 14, 2026
SUBJECT: RECEIVE AND FILE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS REPORT
FOR SEPTEMBER 2026

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND
The City publishes a report on total disbursements each month pursuant to Government Code Sections 37202 and 37208.

DISCUSSION
There are three source points for disbursement: (1) items disbursed from the City’s General Checking account, including electronic funds transfers (EFTs); (2) items disbursed from the City’s Workers’ Compensation Account (collaboratively managed by City staff and the workers’ compensation Third party administrator); and (3) items disbursed through the payroll process, inclusive of direct deposit transfers to employees, hardcopy checks issued to employees, and electronic transfers to State and Federal taxing authorities.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
Procurement review is not applicable.

Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 51 of 358
SEPTEMBER 2026 DISBURSEMENTS SUMMARY
Schedule of Disbursements -September 2026
Description Amount
General Account Checks $ 397,522
General Account Electronic Fund
Transfers 899,962
Worker's Compensation Checks 48,771
Salaries and Taxes Paid 1,089,567
$ 2,435,822
Operating Expenditures $ 2,261,723
CIP Expenditures 174,099
$ 2,435,822

EXPENDITURES BY MONTH-PAST FIVE MONTHS VERSUS PRIOR YEAR May June July August September
2026 2,760,571 2,203,574 4,660,690 2,421,538 2,261,723
2025 3,069,138 2,388,839 3,783,900 2,994,357 2,239,448
Due to 3 payrolls in July
versus 2 in prior year
Due to $70K paid to City of West Covina for
Mark 43 maintenance fee, $76K paid to CIty
of South Pasadena for Shared Command
invoice, $31K reissuance check to the Los
Angeles County Clerk for the General
Election, and $112K paid to San Marino
School Distri
Due to timing of
the PERS medical
invoice
Due to 3 payrolls in
August 2025 vs 2
payrolls in August 2026
0 550,000
1,100,000
1,650,000
2,200,000
2,750,000
3,300,000
3,850,000
4,400,000
Operating Expenditures By Month
PAGE 52 of 358

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Council receive and file the Monthly Disbursements Report for the month of September 2026. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
“I move to receive and file the Monthly Disbursements Report for the month of September 2026.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. September 2026 Transactions by Account Summary
PAGE 53 of 358
User:

Printed: 10/01/2026 - 10:13AM
LCarlson
Transactions by Account
Batch: 00000.00.0000
Accounts Payable
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-00-1060-0000 Ford of Montebello Weather Stripping 09/04/2026 23076 141.82 101-00-1060-0000 Ford of Montebello Door Moulding 09/04/2026 23076 175.08 101-00-1060-0000 Ford of Montebello Oil Switch 09/04/2026 23076 28.44 101-00-1060-0000 Ford of Montebello Speed Sensor 09/18/2026 23121 405.03 Vendor Subtotal: 750.37
101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Batteries 09/04/2026 0 700.42 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Oil & Filters 09/04/2026 0 300.39 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Electric Cleaner 09/04/2026 0 37.55 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Batterries 09/04/2026 0 297.60 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Filters & Oil 09/18/2026 0 215.12 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts CV Shafts 09/18/2026 0 579.45 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Wheel Weight 09/18/2026 0 60.53 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Oil Pressure Switch 09/18/2026 0 19.96 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Credit 09/18/2026 0 -22.00 101-00-1060-0000 O'Reilly Auto Parts Credit 09/18/2026 0 -364.02 Vendor Subtotal: 1,825.00
101-01-4420-0000 U.S. Bank Canva-Business Card City Council 09/30/2026 23147 21.95 Vendor Subtotal: 21.95
101-08-4016-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium August 2026 09/04/2026 23058 139.20 Vendor Subtotal: 139.20
101-08-4016-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium Sept 2026 09/04/2026 23070 742.80 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 1 PAGE 54 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal: 742.80
101-08-4016-0000 John Penido Medical Retirement Sept 2026 09/18/2026 0 1,047.00 Vendor Subtotal: 1,047.00
101-08-4016-0000 PERS (Medical) Medical Premium Sept 2026 09/04/2026 0 12,475.00 Vendor Subtotal: 12,475.00
101-08-4150-0000 PERS (Medical) Admin Fee for Retired Sept 2026 09/04/2026 0 43.80 101-08-4150-0000 PERS (Medical) Admin Fee for Active Sept 2026 09/04/2026 0 167.09 Vendor Subtotal: 210.89
101-08-4150-0500 SDI Presence LLC Veeam Backup Licenses July 2026 09/18/2026 0 277.50 0000001322 101-08-4150-0500 SDI Presence LLC Proofpoint July 2026 09/18/2026 0 955.50 0000001322 101-08-4150-0500 SDI Presence LLC Managed IT Service July 2026 09/18/2026 0 16,768.83 0000001322 Vendor Subtotal: 18,001.83
101-08-4150-0500 U.S. Bank Oracle-Monthly DNS 09/30/2026 23147 1.89 Vendor Subtotal: 1.89
101-08-4150-0750 AT&T Mobility Citywide Cellphone Service 7/3/26-8/2/26 (Non-Uniform) 09/04/2026 23062 1,993.81 101-08-4150-0750 AT&T Mobility Citywide Cellphone Service 7/3/26-8/2/26 (Uniform) 09/04/2026 23062 41.29 Vendor Subtotal: 2,035.10
101-08-4376-0000 AT&T Mobility Hotspot Service 7/3/26-8/2/26 (Non-Uniform) 09/04/2026 23062 100.00 Vendor Subtotal: 100.00
101-08-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service 7/15/26-8/14/26 City Hall 09/04/2026 23099 23.45 Vendor Subtotal: 23.45
AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 2 PAGE 55 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-08-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service 7/12/26-8/11/26 City Hall 09/04/2026 23059 746.79 Vendor Subtotal: 746.79
101-08-4500-9025 AT&T City Hall Compound Internet Service 8/11/26-9/10/26 2nd Fl City 09/04/2026 23060 293.52 Vendor Subtotal: 293.52
101-09-4150-0000 American Legal Publishing Ordinance Publication Supplement Pages O-25-1418-O-26-1425 09/18/2026 23112 4,081.33 Vendor Subtotal: 4,081.33
101-09-4150-0000 Janet Martinez Interim City Clerk Service 8/3/26-8/17/26 09/04/2026 23063 3,437.50 Vendor Subtotal: 3,437.50
101-09-4150-0000 Quench USA, Inc Drinking Water Service Sept 2026 City Hall 09/04/2026 23090 55.67 Vendor Subtotal: 55.67
101-09-4150-0500 U.S. Bank Monday.com-PRA Request Online Software 09/30/2026 23147 517.91 Vendor Subtotal: 517.91
101-09-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Canva-Business Card CM Office 09/30/2026 23147 41.70 Vendor Subtotal: 41.70
101-09-4376-0000 Vina Engraving Name Plates 09/18/2026 23146 88.40 Vendor Subtotal: 88.40
101-09-4396-0000 MMASC Membership- N.Calistro 09/04/2026 23085 125.00 101-09-4396-0000 MMASC Membership- N.Tibbet 09/04/2026 23085 125.00 Vendor Subtotal: 250.00
AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 3 PAGE 56 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-09-4396-0000 San Gabriel Valley City Managers Association Annual Membership CM 7/1/26-6/30/27 09/04/2026 23096 55.00 Vendor Subtotal: 55.00
101-09-4396-0000 U.S. Bank CA Municipal- Membership N.Calistro 09/30/2026 23147 300.00 101-09-4396-0000 U.S. Bank ICMA-Membership N.Tibbet 09/30/2026 23147 200.00 Vendor Subtotal: 500.00
101-09-4480-0000 MMASC WLS Event Registration N.Calistro 09/04/2026 23085 185.00 Vendor Subtotal: 185.00
101-09-4480-0000 U.S. Bank CA Municipal- Workshop N.Calistro 09/30/2026 23147 250.00 Vendor Subtotal: 250.00
101-10-4150-0000 Health & Human Resource Center, IncEmployee Assistance Program Sept 2026 09/04/2026 23057 254.34 101-10-4150-0000 Health & Human Resource Center, IncEmployee Assistance Program Oct 2026 09/18/2026 23111 252.77 Vendor Subtotal: 507.11
101-10-4150-0000 The Counseling Team Intl. Employee Support Service Dec 2025 09/04/2026 0 1,523.66 Vendor Subtotal: 1,523.66
101-10-4150-0000 USI Insurance Service National, Inc Group Benefit Service Sept 2026 09/18/2026 23144 1,250.00 Vendor Subtotal: 1,250.00
101-10-4436-0000 U.S. Bank Mari-Vees-Lunch-for Interview Panel- Planner09/30/2026 23147 120.37 101-10-4436-0000 U.S. Bank Corner Bakery-Lunch Interview Panel - Library09/30/2026 Asst. 23147 63.85 101-10-4436-0000 U.S. Bank Donnoe & Assoc- Corporal Test Materials 09/30/2026 23147 355.00 101-10-4436-0000 U.S. Bank Starbucks-Coffee for Interview Panel-Urban Forester 09/30/2026 23147 26.40 101-10-4436-0000 U.S. Bank California Fish-Lunch Interview Panel HR Analyst 09/30/2026 23147 52.19 Vendor Subtotal: 617.81
101-10-4468-0000 U.S. Bank CALPELRA-Training L.Guerrero 09/30/2026 23147 395.00 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 4 PAGE 57 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal: 395.00
101-11-4150-0000 Harris & Associates Inc Sewer User Fee Admin Service August 2026 09/18/2026 23123 2,187.50 101-11-4150-0000 Harris & Associates Inc Public Safety Tax Admin Service August 202609/18/2026 23123 1,931.25 Vendor Subtotal: 4,118.75
101-11-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease August 2026 City Hall 2nd Fl 09/04/2026 0 288.47 0000001302 Vendor Subtotal: 288.47
101-11-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Contract Copier Base Rate Charge 8/23/26-9/22/26 Admin City Hall 09/04/2026 0 164.70 0000001303 Vendor Subtotal: 164.70
101-11-4376-0000 Office Depot Office Supplies 09/04/2026 23088 84.95 Vendor Subtotal: 84.95
101-11-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Canva-Business Cards-Finance Dept 09/30/2026 23147 20.85 Vendor Subtotal: 20.85
101-11-4468-0000 U.S. Bank Government Tax-Tax Training-Account Clerk 09/30/2026 23147 600.00 101-11-4468-0000 U.S. Bank Government Tax Seminar-C.Mize & L.Carlson09/30/2026 23147 450.00 101-11-4468-0000 U.S. Bank Government Tax-Tax Training-Finance Director09/30/2026 23147 600.00 Vendor Subtotal: 1,650.00
101-11-4480-0000 U.S. Bank Government Finance Office-Training Treasurer09/30/2026 23147 770.00 Vendor Subtotal: 770.00
101-14-3308-0000 Greg Salsbury Refund-Plan Check Fee 1151 Oxford Rd 09/04/2026 23056 9,461.53 Vendor Subtotal: 9,461.53
AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 5 PAGE 58 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-14-3312-0000 Jimmy Jackson Tam Refund -Partial for DRC Application 1085 San Marino Ave 09/18/2026 23108 452.50 Vendor Subtotal: 452.50
101-14-3312-0000 Brian Nicholson Refund- Deposit Street Container 1730 Euclid Ave 09/04/2026 23054 500.00 Vendor Subtotal: 500.00
101-14-3410-0500 Dokmay P Tsai Refund- Admin Citation Fee Per Hearing Officer 09/04/2026 23055 3,207.00 Vendor Subtotal: 3,207.00
101-14-4010-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium August 2026 09/04/2026 23058 -10.24 Vendor Subtotal: -10.24
101-14-4104-6270 The Code Group Inc Plan Check Service August 2026 09/18/2026 0 15,372.00 0000001313 101-14-4104-6270 The Code Group Inc Fire Inspection Service August 2026 09/18/2026 0 8,591.02 0000001313 101-14-4104-6270 The Code Group Inc Over the Counter Plan Check Service August 2026 09/18/2026 0 460.00 0000001313 101-14-4104-6270 The Code Group Inc Fire Plan Check Service August 2026 09/18/2026 0 4,055.50 0000001313 Vendor Subtotal: 28,478.52
101-14-4150-0000 Rincon Consultants Contract Planning Service August 2026 09/18/2026 0 18,448.00 0000001312 Vendor Subtotal: 18,448.00
101-14-4150-0500 HdL Software, LLC Business License Software Annual Fee and Hosting 9/1/26-8/31/27 09/18/2026 23124 21,109.01 0000001311 101-14-4150-0500 HdL Software, LLC Payment Service Annual Fee 9/1/26-8/31/27 09/18/2026 23124 420.00 0000001311 Vendor Subtotal: 21,529.01
101-14-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease August 2026 CDD 1st Fl City Hall 09/04/2026 0 162.03 0000001302 101-14-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease August 2026 CE ( Library) 09/04/2026 0 111.95 0000001302 Vendor Subtotal: 273.98
101-14-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Contract Copier Base Rate Charge 8/17/26-9/16/26 CE Library 09/04/2026 0 56.82 0000001303 101-14-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Contract Copier Base Rate Charge 8/21/26-9/20/26 CDD 09/04/2026 0 396.41 0000001303 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 6 PAGE 59 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-14-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Contract Copier Usages 5/21/26-8/20/26 CCD09/04/2026 0 70.16 0000001303 101-14-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Shipping on Copier Toner 09/04/2026 0 12.95 Vendor Subtotal: 536.34
101-14-4500-9025 AT&T City Hall Compound Internet Service 8/11/26-9/10/26 CDD 09/04/2026 23060 293.52 Vendor Subtotal: 293.52
101-14-4500-9025 AT&T Mobility Hotspot Service 7/3/26-8/2/26 (Bldg.Inspector)09/04/2026 23062 40.00 Vendor Subtotal: 40.00
101-14-4508-0000 U.S. Bank Alhambra Car Wash-Car Wash Code Enforcement Vehicle 09/30/2026 23147 29.99 Vendor Subtotal: 29.99
101-36-4316-0000 Cobra Fire Protection Fire Extinguishers Seviced- FD 09/18/2026 23116 229.80 Vendor Subtotal: 229.80
101-36-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Canva-Community Alert Banners 09/30/2026 23147 192.53 Vendor Subtotal: 192.53
101-36-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service 7/12/26-8/11/26 EOC 09/18/2026 23113 331.58 Vendor Subtotal: 331.58
101-36-4500-9025 Charter Communications Cable Service 8/8/26-9/7/26 EOC 09/04/2026 23100 156.43 Vendor Subtotal: 156.43
101-40-4150-0000 Delong Unlimited PW Uniform Shirts 09/04/2026 23069 679.57 Vendor Subtotal: 679.57
101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Mat Service 09/04/2026 23105 55.92 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 7 PAGE 60 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Mat Service 09/04/2026 23105 55.92 Vendor Subtotal: 111.84
101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 09/04/2026 23106 48.69 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 09/04/2026 23106 86.93 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 09/04/2026 23106 86.93 101-40-4150-0000 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 09/04/2026 23106 48.69 Vendor Subtotal: 271.24
101-40-4150-0500 PSD Citywide (US) Inc Asset Management Software August 2026-May 2027 09/18/2026 0 2,500.00 Vendor Subtotal: 2,500.00
101-40-4150-5171 EcoNomics, Inc Solid Waste Consulting Service July 2026 09/18/2026 0 26,472.58 0000001224 Vendor Subtotal: 26,472.58
101-40-4260-0000 Superior Awning Installation New Awning 09/18/2026 23141 4,153.50 Vendor Subtotal: 4,153.50
101-40-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease August 2026 PW 09/04/2026 0 269.08 0000001302 Vendor Subtotal: 269.08
101-40-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Office Depot-Office Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 57.10 101-40-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Apple.com-ICloud Storage 09/30/2026 23147 2.99 101-40-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Breakroom Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 29.54 101-40-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Staples-Folders for File Cabinets 09/30/2026 23147 105.73 101-40-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Breakroom Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 133.63 Vendor Subtotal: 328.99
101-40-4492-0003 Delong Unlimited PW Uniform Shirts 09/04/2026 23069 741.91 Vendor Subtotal: 741.91
AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 8 PAGE 61 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-40-4492-0003 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 09/04/2026 23106 94.91 101-40-4492-0003 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 09/04/2026 23106 53.16 101-40-4492-0003 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 09/04/2026 23106 53.16 101-40-4492-0003 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 09/04/2026 23106 94.91 Vendor Subtotal: 296.14
101-40-4492-0004 Delong Unlimited PW Uniform Shirts 09/04/2026 23069 979.69 Vendor Subtotal: 979.69
101-40-4492-0004 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 09/04/2026 23106 125.33 101-40-4492-0004 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 09/04/2026 23106 125.33 101-40-4492-0004 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 09/04/2026 23106 70.19 101-40-4492-0004 Vestis Public Works Uniform Service 09/04/2026 23106 70.19 Vendor Subtotal: 391.04
101-40-4500-9025 AT&T City Hall Compound Internet Service 8/11/26-9/10/26 PW Admin 09/04/2026 23060 185.37 Vendor Subtotal: 185.37
101-42-4150-0000 Enterprise Fleet Management Fleet Lease Sept 2026 09/18/2026 0 14,506.61 Vendor Subtotal: 14,506.61
101-42-4150-0000 R & A Tank Technologies LLC Gas Tank Monthly Inspection Sept 2026 09/18/2026 0 175.00 101-42-4150-0000 R & A Tank Technologies LLC Scaled Drawing for CERS 09/18/2026 0 300.00 101-42-4150-0000 R & A Tank Technologies LLC AQMD Rule 461 Testing 09/18/2026 0 850.00 Vendor Subtotal: 1,325.00
101-42-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Harbor Freight-Supplies for Shop 09/30/2026 23147 71.00 Vendor Subtotal: 71.00
101-42-4452-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Small Equipment for Fleet 09/30/2026 23147 40.60 Vendor Subtotal: 40.60
AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 9 PAGE 62 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-48-4150-0000 L.A. Co. Dept of Public Works Traffic Signal Maintenance June 2026 09/04/2026 23081 331.00 Vendor Subtotal: 331.00
101-48-4150-9020 Nationwide Environmental Service Street Sweeping Service August 2026 09/18/2026 23129 12,145.80 0000001317 Vendor Subtotal: 12,145.80
101-50-4376-0000 Ganahl Lumber Company Bathroom Supplies-Lacy Park 09/04/2026 23077 69.59 Vendor Subtotal: 69.59
101-50-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Park Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 277.63 101-50-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Supplies for Lacy Park 09/30/2026 23147 266.96 Vendor Subtotal: 544.59
101-52-4376-0000 JHM Supply Irrigation Supplies 09/04/2026 0 20.17 101-52-4376-0000 JHM Supply Irrigation Supplies 09/04/2026 0 377.94 Vendor Subtotal: 398.11
101-52-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Harbor Freight-Ground Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 47.46 Vendor Subtotal: 47.46
101-52-4500-9460 City of Alhambra Utilities Dept Water Service 5/26/26-7/27/26 09/04/2026 23066 197.72 Vendor Subtotal: 197.72
101-53-4150-0000 Graycon Inc Quarterly Maintenance Inspection -August 2026 PD 09/04/2026 23078 762.50 101-53-4150-0000 Graycon Inc Quarterly Maintenance Inspection -August 2026 FD 09/04/2026 23078 701.25 Vendor Subtotal: 1,463.75
101-53-4206-0000 McKendry Door Sales Repair Doors-Library 09/04/2026 23084 1,062.50 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 10 PAGE 63 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal: 1,062.50
101-53-4206-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Electrical Work 09/30/2026 23147 298.25 101-53-4206-0000 U.S. Bank Red Supply-Restroom Repair PD 09/30/2026 23147 126.60 101-53-4206-0000 U.S. Bank Esvata- Shades for Library Windows 09/30/2026 23147 490.00 101-53-4206-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Electrical Work 09/30/2026 23147 522.81 Vendor Subtotal: 1,437.66
101-53-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Drill Bits 09/30/2026 23147 77.28 101-53-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Tools & Electrical Meter 09/30/2026 23147 518.21 101-53-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Electrical Outlets 09/30/2026 23147 65.77 101-53-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Floor & Decor- Maintenance Supplies for PW Office 09/30/2026 23147 188.77 101-53-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Antrim's Lock & Key-Keys for Lacy Park 09/30/2026 23147 69.62 101-53-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Industrial Pipe-Aluminum Piece for Building Pipes 09/30/2026 23147 8.74 101-53-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Smart & Final-Maintenance Supplies for Lacy Park O 09/30/2026 ffice 23147 49.52 101-53-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Tools & Utility Cart 09/30/2026 23147 291.40 Vendor Subtotal: 1,269.31
101-59-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Premium Sept 2026 09/04/2026 0 1,128.53 Vendor Subtotal: 1,128.53
101-59-4396-0000 U.S. Bank CLA Membership T.Torres 09/30/2026 23147 205.00 101-59-4396-0000 U.S. Bank American Library Assoc.-Membership A.Watts09/30/2026 23147 215.00 101-59-4396-0000 U.S. Bank CLA-MembershipJ.Van Hook 09/30/2026 23147 140.00 101-59-4396-0000 U.S. Bank CLA-Membership V.Eagerton 09/30/2026 23147 40.00 Vendor Subtotal: 600.00
101-59-4468-0000 U.S. Bank CLA-Conference Registration A.Watts 09/30/2026 23147 250.00 101-59-4468-0000 U.S. Bank CLA-Conference V.Eagerton 09/30/2026 23147 250.00 101-59-4468-0000 U.S. Bank CLA-Conference Registration J.Van Hook 09/30/2026 23147 250.00 Vendor Subtotal: 750.00
101-59-4480-0000 Eddie Covarrubias Training-Per Diem Rate Dinner (1) 10/6/26-10/9/26 09/18/2026 0 36.00 101-59-4480-0000 Eddie Covarrubias Training-Per Diem Rate Lunch (2) 10/6/26-10/9/26 09/18/2026 0 46.00 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 11 PAGE 64 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-59-4480-0000 Eddie Covarrubias Training-Per Diem Rate Incidentals(4) 10/6/26-10/9/26 09/18/2026 0 20.00 101-59-4480-0000 Eddie Covarrubias Training-Per Diem Rate Breakfast (2) 10/6/26-10/9/26 09/18/2026 0 44.00 Vendor Subtotal: 146.00
101-59-4480-0000 Vanessa Eagerton Training-Per Diem Rate Dinner (3) 9/21/26-9/24/26 09/04/2026 23072 108.00 101-59-4480-0000 Vanessa Eagerton Training-Per Diem Rate Lunch (1) 9/21/26-9/24/26 09/04/2026 23072 23.00 101-59-4480-0000 Vanessa Eagerton Training-Per Diem Rate Incidentals (4) 9/21/26-9/24/26 09/04/2026 23072 20.00 Vendor Subtotal: 151.00
101-59-4480-0000 U.S. Bank Rancho Bernardo Inn- Hotel Deposit Conference K. 09/30/2026 Tran 23147 284.24 101-59-4480-0000 U.S. Bank Southwest-Conference Flight E.Covarrubias & A.Padila 09/30/2026 23147 627.60 Vendor Subtotal: 911.84
101-60-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Contract Copier Usages Charge 6/11/26-9/10/26 SMCC 09/18/2026 0 280.05 0000001303 101-60-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Contract Copier Base Rate Charge 9/11/26-10/10/26 SMCC 09/18/2026 0 276.35 0000001303 Vendor Subtotal: 556.40
101-60-4376-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Shipping on Copier Toner 09/04/2026 0 13.70 101-60-4376-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Shipping on Copier Toner 09/04/2026 0 13.53 Vendor Subtotal: 27.23
101-60-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Keyboard & Mouse 09/30/2026 23147 24.79 Vendor Subtotal: 24.79
101-60-4508-0000 U.S. Bank Antrim's Lock & Key -Golf Cart Key 09/30/2026 23147 13.26 Vendor Subtotal: 13.26
101-62-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Adventure Tots Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 17.55 101-62-4376-0000 U.S. Bank The Cub House -Freewheeler Snacks 09/30/2026 23147 39.51 101-62-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Adventure Tots Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 99.34 101-62-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Pizzanista-Freewheeler Snacks 09/30/2026 23147 60.91 101-62-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Starbucks-Freewheeler Snacks 09/30/2026 23147 42.55 101-62-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Adventure Tots Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 13.16 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 12 PAGE 65 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-62-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Cal Oaks-Freewheeler Snacks 09/30/2026 23147 38.00 101-62-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Cal Oaks-Freewheeler Snacks 09/30/2026 23147 74.50 101-62-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Pizzanista-Freewheeler Snacks 09/30/2026 23147 63.65 101-62-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Camp Lacy Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 9.33 101-62-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Adventure Tots Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 23.44 Vendor Subtotal: 481.94
101-62-4486-0000 U.S. Bank Slick City Ontario-Camp Lacy Field Trip 09/30/2026 23147 370.40 101-62-4486-0000 U.S. Bank Raging Waters-Freewheeler Field Trip 09/30/2026 23147 315.82 101-62-4486-0000 U.S. Bank Slick City Ontario-Camp Lacy Field Trip 09/30/2026 23147 500.37 101-62-4486-0000 U.S. Bank Raging Waters-Freewheeler Field Trip 09/30/2026 23147 887.76 101-62-4486-0000 U.S. Bank Slick City Ontario-Camp Lacy Field Trip 09/30/2026 23147 392.06 101-62-4486-0000 U.S. Bank Lucky Strike -Freewheeler Field Trip 09/30/2026 23147 276.14 101-62-4486-0000 U.S. Bank Slick City Ontario-Camp Lacy Field Trip 09/30/2026 23147 392.05 101-62-4486-0000 U.S. Bank Strong Hold Climbing-Freewheeler Field Trip 09/30/2026 23147 405.00 Vendor Subtotal: 3,539.60
101-64-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Senior Connections Games 09/30/2026 23147 28.19 101-64-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Ping Pong Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 30.72 101-64-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Senior Connections Coffee Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 31.56 Vendor Subtotal: 90.47
101-66-4150-0000 Cassidy Olson Family Night Golf Vendor 09/18/2026 23132 912.55 Vendor Subtotal: 912.55
101-66-4150-0000 Lynn Radmacher Band Concert in Park 8/14/26 09/04/2026 23101 3,800.00 Vendor Subtotal: 3,800.00
101-66-4150-0000 U.S. Bank Starlink-Starlink Service 09/30/2026 23147 175.00 101-66-4150-0000 U.S. Bank Palm Springs-Family Night Mini Golf Deposit09/30/2026 23147 135.00 Vendor Subtotal: 310.00
101-66-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Movie Night 2 Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 52.49 101-66-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Movie Night #2 Craft Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 71.24 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 13 PAGE 66 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-66-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Ralph-Water for Movies & Concerts 09/30/2026 23147 39.95 101-66-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Movie Night 2 Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 29.62 101-66-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Movie Night 2 Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 136.81 Vendor Subtotal: 330.11
101-68-4102-0000 Waylie Tang Contracted Classes-Summer 2026 Line Dancing09/04/2026 23097 1,987.20 Vendor Subtotal: 1,987.20
101-70-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Cleaning Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 23.22 101-70-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Library Curtain Charger 09/30/2026 23147 17.54 101-70-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Sam's Club-Cleaning Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 84.55 101-70-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-CPL Book Drop Hinge & Lock 09/30/2026 23147 25.30 101-70-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Facility Cleaning Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 20.87 101-70-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Facilities Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 18.65 101-70-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Phone Case 09/30/2026 23147 24.08 Vendor Subtotal: 214.21
101-70-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service 7/15/26-8/14/26 SMCC 09/04/2026 23099 50.01 101-70-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service 7/15/26-8/14/26 Thurnher 09/04/2026 23099 15.55 Vendor Subtotal: 65.56
101-70-4500-9025 Charter Communications Cable Internet Service 8/1/26-8/31/26 Stoneman09/18/2026 23142 350.00 Vendor Subtotal: 350.00
101-90-4150-0000 Quench USA, Inc Drinking Water Service Sept 2026 Library 09/18/2026 23137 58.72 Vendor Subtotal: 58.72
101-90-4150-0500 EnvisionWare Inc Internet Access Management/Print Service 9/1/26-8/31/27 09/18/2026 0 1,495.00 101-90-4150-0500 EnvisionWare Inc Internet Access Management/Print Service 9/1/26-8/31/27 09/18/2026 0 419.35 Vendor Subtotal: 1,914.35
101-90-4150-0500 Imperial County Office of Education Public Internet Access April-June 2026 Library09/04/2026 23080 2,286.58 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 14 PAGE 67 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal: 2,286.58
101-90-4150-0500 OCLC Inc EZproxy Subscription 9/1/26-8/31/27 09/18/2026 23130 2,404.68 Vendor Subtotal: 2,404.68
101-90-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Contract Copier Base Rate Charge 9/13/26-10/12/26 Library 09/18/2026 0 323.50 0000001303 Vendor Subtotal: 323.50
101-90-4376-0000 Office Depot Cash Register Paper Thermal Rolls 09/04/2026 23088 37.97 Vendor Subtotal: 37.97
101-90-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Binders 09/30/2026 23147 12.13 101-90-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon -Laminating Sheets 09/30/2026 23147 52.66 101-90-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Cardstock 09/30/2026 23147 26.76 101-90-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Copy Paper 09/30/2026 23147 161.31 101-90-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Best Buy-A/V Cables 09/30/2026 23147 15.44 Vendor Subtotal: 268.30
101-90-4412-0000 U.S. Bank USPS-Postage 09/30/2026 23147 516.00 101-90-4412-0000 U.S. Bank USPS-Postage 09/30/2026 23147 35.90 101-90-4412-0000 U.S. Bank USPS-Postage 09/30/2026 23147 528.90 101-90-4412-0000 U.S. Bank USPS-Postage 09/30/2026 23147 35.90 101-90-4412-0000 U.S. Bank USPS-Postage 09/30/2026 23147 35.90 Vendor Subtotal: 1,152.60
101-90-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service 7/15/26-8/14/26 Library 09/04/2026 23099 94.36 Vendor Subtotal: 94.36
101-90-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service 7/12/26-8/11/26 Library 09/18/2026 23113 123.56 Vendor Subtotal: 123.56
AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 15 PAGE 68 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 101-90-4500-9025 Charter Communications Cable Internet Service 8/2/26-9/1/26 Library 09/04/2026 23100 154.00 Vendor Subtotal: 154.00
101-91-4370-0335 Tsai Fong Books Inc Books 09/18/2026 23143 375.58 Vendor Subtotal: 375.58
101-91-4370-0335 U.S. Bank Amazon-Book 09/30/2026 23147 13.16 101-91-4370-0335 U.S. Bank Amazon-Book 09/30/2026 23147 18.10 101-91-4370-0335 U.S. Bank Amazon-Books 09/30/2026 23147 11.90 101-91-4370-0335 U.S. Bank Amazon-Books 09/30/2026 23147 36.80 101-91-4370-0335 U.S. Bank Amazon-Book 09/30/2026 23147 14.26 101-91-4370-0335 U.S. Bank Amazon-Refund 09/30/2026 23147 -10.48 Vendor Subtotal: 83.74
101-91-4370-1985 EBSCO Information Services Novelist Database 9/1/26-8/31/27 09/04/2026 23073 2,542.00 Vendor Subtotal: 2,542.00
101-91-4370-6805 Pasadena Star News 26 Weeks Subscription 09/18/2026 23134 958.27 Vendor Subtotal: 958.27
101-91-4370-6805 U.S. Bank HBR- Annual Subscription 09/30/2026 23147 135.00 Vendor Subtotal: 135.00
101-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 09/18/2026 0 19.69 0000001306 Vendor Subtotal: 19.69
101-92-4370-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Books 09/30/2026 23147 34.63 Vendor Subtotal: 34.63
101-93-4150-0000 Tsai Fong Books Inc Marc Records 09/04/2026 23103 207.35 101-93-4150-0000 Tsai Fong Books Inc Marc Records 09/18/2026 23143 159.50 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 16 PAGE 69 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal: 366.85
101-93-4376-0000 Demco Inc Processing Supplies 09/18/2026 0 809.00 Vendor Subtotal: 809.00
Subtotal for Fund: 101 246,244.81
102-00-2010-0000 CA State Disbursement Unit PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Earnings Withholding Order 08/28/2026 0 302.97 102-00-2010-0000 CA State Disbursement Unit PR Batch 00701.09.2026 Earnings Withholding Order 09/11/2026 0 302.97 Vendor Subtotal: 605.94
102-00-2010-0000 State Franchise Tax Board PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Earnings Withholding Order 08/28/2026 23095 100.00 102-00-2010-0000 State Franchise Tax Board PR Batch 00701.09.2026 Earnings Withholding Order 09/11/2026 23138 100.00 Vendor Subtotal: 200.00
102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Critical Illness 08/28/2026 0 53.89 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Cancer Insurance-Before 08/28/2026 Tax 0 238.11 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Cancer Insurance-After 08/28/2026 Tax 0 80.00 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Life Insurance-After Tax 08/28/2026 0 1,180.61 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Group Hospt Indeminity Pre 08/28/2026 Tax 0 15.56 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Accident Insurance-After 08/28/2026 Tax 0 43.37 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Accident Insurance-Before 08/28/2026 Tax 0 451.15 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Disability STD-After08/28/2026 Tax 0 1,031.50 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00001.08.2026 Cancer Insurance-Before 08/14/2026 Tax 0 238.11 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00001.08.2026 Cancer Insurance-After 08/14/2026 Tax 0 80.00 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00001.08.2026 Group Hospt Indeminity Pre 08/14/2026 Tax 0 15.56 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00001.08.2026 Disability STD-After08/14/2026 Tax 0 1,031.50 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00001.08.2026 Accident Insurance-Before 08/14/2026 Tax 0 451.15 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00001.08.2026 Accident Insurance-After 08/14/2026 Tax 0 43.37 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00001.08.2026 Life Insurance-After Tax 08/14/2026 0 1,180.61 102-00-2011-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00001.08.2026 Critical Illness 08/14/2026 0 53.89 Vendor Subtotal: 6,188.38
102-00-2011-0000 Texas Life Insurance Company PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Texas Life After 2 08/28/2026 23098 353.03 102-00-2011-0000 Texas Life Insurance Company PR Batch 00001.08.2026 Texas Life After 08/14/2026 23098 353.12 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 17 PAGE 70 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal: 706.15
102-00-2011-0000 Transamerica Life Insurance PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Life Insurance-Transamerica 08/28/2026 23102 27.03 102-00-2011-0000 Transamerica Life Insurance PR Batch 00001.08.2026 Life Insurance-Transamerica 08/14/2026 23102 27.03 Vendor Subtotal: 54.06
102-00-2012-3080 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Deferred Comp-City Manager 08/28/2026 0 556.92 102-00-2012-3080 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.09.2026 Deferred Comp-City Manager 09/11/2026 0 556.92 Vendor Subtotal: 1,113.84
102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Deferred Comp 08/28/2026 0 19,172.16 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Deferred Comp Benefit 08/28/2026 0 6,675.00 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Deferred Comp-Loan Payback 08/28/2026 0 770.12 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Deferred Comp 08/28/2026 0 226.02 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Deferred Comp-Worker's Comp 08/28/2026 0 300.00 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Deferred Comp-Loan Payback 08/28/2026 0 376.18 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Deferred Comp-Loan Payback 08/28/2026 0 2,251.32 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.09.2026 Deferred Comp 09/11/2026 0 19,172.16 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.09.2026 Deferred Comp-Loan Payback 09/11/2026 0 770.12 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.09.2026 Deferred Comp-Loan Payback 09/11/2026 0 758.11 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.09.2026 Deferred Comp-Loan Payback 09/11/2026 0 2,251.32 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.09.2026 Deferred Comp-Worker's Comp 09/11/2026 0 300.00 102-00-2012-3190 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00701.09.2026 Deferred Comp 09/11/2026 0 226.02 Vendor Subtotal: 53,248.53
102-00-2012-6050 U.S. Bank PR Batch 00701.09.2026 PARS Employee Portion 09/11/2026 0 764.32 102-00-2012-6050 U.S. Bank PR Batch 00701.09.2026 PARS Employer Portion 09/11/2026 0 764.32 102-00-2012-6050 U.S. Bank PR Batch 00702.09.2026 PARS Employer Portion 09/25/2026 0 791.08 102-00-2012-6050 U.S. Bank PR Batch 00702.09.2026 PARS Employee Portion 09/25/2026 0 791.08 Vendor Subtotal: 3,110.80
102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00702.08.2026 PERS Employer Share08/28/2026 0 68,385.94 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00702.08.2026 PERS Employee Paid (Part- 08/28/2026 Time) 0 982.32 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00702.08.2026 PERSO Workers Comp08/28/2026 0 2,817.70 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00702.08.2026 PERS Employer Share08/28/2026 WC 0 6,075.93 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00702.08.2026 PERS Employee Paid (Full 08/28/2026 Time) 0 44,964.98 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 18 PAGE 71 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00702.08.2026 PERS Survivor Benefit 08/28/2026 0 106.02 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00701.09.2026 PERS Employee Paid (Part- 09/11/2026 Time) 0 855.78 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00701.09.2026 PERS Survivor Benefit 09/11/2026 0 106.02 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00701.09.2026 PERS Employer Share09/11/2026 0 70,230.95 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00701.09.2026 PERSO Workers Comp09/11/2026 0 1,876.95 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00701.09.2026 PERS Employer Share09/ WC11/2026 0 3,933.28 102-00-2012-6160 PERS PR Batch 00701.09.2026 PERS Employee Paid (Full 09/11/2026 Time) 0 45,465.71 Vendor Subtotal: 245,801.58
102-00-2012-7030 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Retirement Health Savings Plan 08/28/2026 0 632.04 102-00-2012-7030 TIAA-Cref Financial Services PR Batch 00001.08.2026 Retirement Health Savings Plan 08/14/2026 0 632.04 Vendor Subtotal: 1,264.08
102-00-2012-7031 IAFF-MERP PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Medical Expense Reimb Plan (WC 08/28/2026 0 250.00 102-00-2012-7031 IAFF-MERP PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Medical Expense Reimb Plan 08/28/2026 0 2,000.00 102-00-2012-7031 IAFF-MERP PR Batch 00701.09.2026 Medical Expense Reimb Plan 09/11/2026 0 1,950.00 102-00-2012-7031 IAFF-MERP PR Batch 00701.09.2026 Medical Expense Reimb Plan (WC 09/11/2026 0 300.00 Vendor Subtotal: 4,500.00
102-00-2014-0000 Humana Insurance Co PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Life Optional 2 08/28/2026 23079 239.99 102-00-2014-0000 Humana Insurance Co PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Life Optional 08/28/2026 23079 362.31 102-00-2014-0000 Humana Insurance Co PR Batch 00001.08.2026 Life Optional 08/14/2026 23079 602.30 Vendor Subtotal: 1,204.60
102-00-2014-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Basic Life Insurance08/28/2026 23127 535.05 Vendor Subtotal: 535.05
102-00-2015-0000 CA Law Enforcement Assn PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Police Dept LTD/125 Plan 08/28/2026 23114 845.00 Vendor Subtotal: 845.00
102-00-2015-0000 H. Wilson Insurancenter Inc PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Fire Dept LTD/125 Plan 08/28/2026 0 570.00 Vendor Subtotal: 570.00
AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 19 PAGE 72 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 102-00-2015-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Short Term Disability08/28/2026 23127 917.28 102-00-2015-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Long Term Disability08/28/2026 23127 1,252.16 Vendor Subtotal: 2,169.44
102-00-2015-0000 Mutual of Omaha PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Short Term Disability08/28/2026 23086 457.54 Vendor Subtotal: 457.54
102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Peace Officers Res. Assoc. CA 08/28/2026 0 2,708.00 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.08.2026 PERS Platinum (Choice) 08/28/2026 0 58,990.62 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Blue Shield Trio* 08/28/2026 0 3,069.22 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Anthem Blue Cross Select 08/28/2026 0 8,856.66 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.08.2026 SHARP 08/28/2026 0 2,382.12 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.08.2026 PERS Gold (Select) 08/28/2026 0 3,456.11 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.08.2026 UnitedHealthCare Harmony 08/28/2026 0 2,296.53 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Blue Shield Access +08/28/2026 0 10,831.35 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Kaiser Permanente 08/28/2026 0 75,828.17 102-00-2016-0000 PERS (Medical) PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Anthem Blue Cross Traditional 08/28/2026 0 40,175.69 Vendor Subtotal: 208,594.47
102-00-2017-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium August 2026 09/04/2026 23058 30.16 102-00-2017-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Ameritas - VSP Choice Network 08/28/2026 23058 1,911.76 Vendor Subtotal: 1,941.92
102-00-2020-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium Sept 2026 09/04/2026 23070 874.10 102-00-2020-0000 Delta Dental of California PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Delta Dental PPO 08/28/2026 23070 8,948.73 Vendor Subtotal: 9,822.83
102-00-2020-0000 Delta Dental Insurance Company Adjustment Premium Sept 2026 09/04/2026 23071 41.91 102-00-2020-0000 Delta Dental Insurance Company PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Delta Dental DeltaCare US 08/28/2026 A HMO 23071 383.85 Vendor Subtotal: 425.76
102-00-2024-2530 San Marino Firefighters Assn PR Batch 00701.09.2026 Firefighter Dues 09/11/2026 0 1,005.72 102-00-2024-2530 San Marino Firefighters Assn PR Batch 00702.09.2026 Firefighter Dues 09/25/2026 0 1,005.72 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 20 PAGE 73 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal: 2,011.44
102-00-2024-2750 San Marino City Employees Assn PR Batch 00701.09.2026 San Marino City Employee 09/11/2026 Assn 0 435.00 102-00-2024-2750 San Marino City Employees Assn PR Batch 00702.09.2026 San Marino City Employee 09/25/2026 Assn 0 420.00 Vendor Subtotal: 855.00
102-00-2024-2850 San Marino Supervisory Employee Association PR Batch 00701.09.2026 SM Supervisory Employees Dues 09/11/2026 0 195.00 102-00-2024-2850 San Marino Supervisory Employee Association PR Batch 00702.09.2026 SM Supervisory Employees Dues 09/25/2026 0 195.00 Vendor Subtotal: 390.00
102-00-2024-6490 San Marino Police Officers Asn PR Batch 00701.09.2026 San Marino PD Assn09/11/2026 0 903.24 102-00-2024-6490 San Marino Police Officers Asn PR Batch 00702.09.2026 San Marino PD Assn09/25/2026 0 938.24 Vendor Subtotal: 1,841.48
102-00-2028-0000 LegalShield PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Prepaid Legal Services08/28/2026 0 42.88 102-00-2028-0000 LegalShield PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Prepaid Legal Services 2 08/28/2026 0 7.97 102-00-2028-0000 LegalShield PR Batch 00001.08.2026 Prepaid Legal Services08/14/2026 0 50.86 Vendor Subtotal: 101.71
102-00-2032-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Dep Care/125 Plan 08/28/2026 0 937.50 102-00-2032-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00001.08.2026 Dep Care/125 Plan 08/14/2026 0 937.50 Vendor Subtotal: 1,875.00
102-00-2036-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Med Flex/125 Plan (WC) 08/28/2026 0 125.00 102-00-2036-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00702.08.2026 Flexible Spending Plan08/28/2026 0 1,139.15 102-00-2036-0000 American Fidelity Assurance PR Batch 00001.08.2026 Flexible Spending Plan08/14/2026 0 1,264.15 Vendor Subtotal: 2,528.30
Subtotal for Fund: 102 552,962.90
103-30-4010-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium August 2026 09/04/2026 23058 7.92 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 21 PAGE 74 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal: 7.92
103-30-4010-0000 CA Law Enforcement Assn Adjustment Premium Sept 2026 09/18/2026 23114 -96.50 Vendor Subtotal: -96.50
103-30-4010-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium Sept 2026 09/04/2026 23070 48.20 Vendor Subtotal: 48.20
103-30-4010-0000 Delta Dental Insurance Company Adjustment Premium Sept 2026 09/04/2026 23071 -15.79 Vendor Subtotal: -15.79
103-30-4010-0000 Lincoln National Life Insurance Co Adjustment Premium Sept 2026 09/18/2026 23127 22.36 Vendor Subtotal: 22.36
103-30-4150-0000 City of Pasadena Inmate Housing Service July 2026 09/04/2026 23068 1,008.00 Vendor Subtotal: 1,008.00
103-30-4150-0000 Pasadena Humane Society Animal Control Service August 2026 09/18/2026 0 8,599.00 Vendor Subtotal: 8,599.00
103-30-4150-0000 Susan Saxe-Clifford PH.D. Inc Psychological Evaluation-CCW Applicant 09/04/2026 23094 400.00 Vendor Subtotal: 400.00
103-30-4150-0000 San Gabriel Valley Medical Ctr In-Custody Blood Drawn 09/18/2026 23139 48.00 Vendor Subtotal: 48.00
103-30-4150-0000 Vital Medical Service, LLC Blood Withdrawal and Blood Collections in Custody August 2026 09/18/2026 0 1,256.00 Vendor Subtotal: 1,256.00
AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 22 PAGE 75 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 103-30-4150-0500 U.S. Bank Apple.com-ICloud Storage PD 09/30/2026 23147 0.99 103-30-4150-0500 U.S. Bank Apple.com-ICloud Storage PD 09/30/2026 23147 0.99 Vendor Subtotal: 1.98
103-30-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease August 2026 PD 09/04/2026 0 200.26 0000001302 Vendor Subtotal: 200.26
103-30-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Contract Copier Base Rate Charge 9/6/26-10/5/26 PD 09/18/2026 0 227.08 0000001303 Vendor Subtotal: 227.08
103-30-4316-0000 Foothill Communications Inc Repair to Dispatch Console System 09/04/2026 23074 275.00 Vendor Subtotal: 275.00
103-30-4316-0000 U.S. Bank Windsor Cleaners-Recruitment Table Cloths Dry Cleaning 09/30/2026 23147 122.00 103-30-4316-0000 U.S. Bank Antrim's Lock & Key-Radar Trailer Duplicate Key 09/30/2026 23147 6.63 Vendor Subtotal: 128.63
103-30-4376-0000 Quench USA, Inc Drinking Water Service Sept 2026 PD 09/04/2026 23090 96.58 Vendor Subtotal: 96.58
103-30-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Pens 09/30/2026 23147 15.57 103-30-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Pens 09/30/2026 23147 24.61 103-30-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Replacement Battery for Parking Computer 09/30/2026 23147 53.26 103-30-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Privacy Screen 09/30/2026 23147 69.13 103-30-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Batteries 09/30/2026 23147 45.43 103-30-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Aluminum Foil 09/30/2026 23147 42.85 103-30-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Pens 09/30/2026 23147 17.66 103-30-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Sirchie-Evidence Boxes for Guns/Rifles 09/30/2026 23147 201.94 Vendor Subtotal: 470.45
103-30-4376-0200 U.S. Bank Quality Logo- National Night Out Adult Sunglasses Giveaway 09/30/2026 23147 294.94 103-30-4376-0200 U.S. Bank Panda Express-DUI Checkpoint Food for Staff09/30/2026 23147 254.15 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 23 PAGE 76 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 103-30-4376-0200 U.S. Bank Wingstop-National Night Out Food 09/30/2026 23147 184.27 103-30-4376-0200 U.S. Bank Amazon-Giveaways for National Night Out 09/30/2026 23147 256.65 103-30-4376-0200 U.S. Bank Smart & Final-National Night Out Drinks 09/30/2026 23147 93.54 103-30-4376-0200 U.S. Bank Quality Logo- National Night Out Kids Sunglasses Giveaway 09/30/2026 23147 333.04 Vendor Subtotal: 1,416.59
103-30-4415-0000 Naved Qureshi Training-Basic Course (5) 10/19/26-10/23/26 09/04/2026 0 375.00 103-30-4415-0000 Naved Qureshi Training-Basic Course (5) 9/21/26-9/25/26 09/04/2026 0 375.00 Vendor Subtotal: 750.00
103-30-4415-0000 U.S. Bank Sentinel Defense- Credit 09/30/2026 23147 -450.00 103-30-4415-0000 U.S. Bank Poaloc-Training Chief Incontro 09/30/2026 23147 50.00 103-30-4415-0000 U.S. Bank Ayres-Training Hotel 8/17/26-8/20/26 Ofc.Espinoza 09/30/2026 23147 508.28 103-30-4415-0000 U.S. Bank Ayres-Training Hotel 8/10/26-8/14/26 Ofc.Espinoza 09/30/2026 23147 716.05 Vendor Subtotal: 824.33
103-30-4420-0000 U.S. Bank Canva-Business Cards- PD 09/30/2026 23147 31.28 103-30-4420-0000 U.S. Bank Canva-Business Card PD 09/30/2026 23147 20.85 Vendor Subtotal: 52.13
103-30-4468-0000 U.S. Bank Poalac-Training Sgt.Wilson 09/30/2026 23147 75.00 103-30-4468-0000 U.S. Bank Poalac- Training -Cmdr.Qureshi 09/30/2026 23147 50.00 103-30-4468-0000 U.S. Bank Glock-Refund 09/30/2026 23147 -300.00 Vendor Subtotal: -175.00
103-30-4480-0000 John Incontro Conference-Per Diem Rate Dinner (1) 9/29/26-10/2/26 09/18/2026 23125 36.00 Vendor Subtotal: 36.00
103-30-4480-0000 U.S. Bank Clears-Conference Registration D.Gascon 09/30/2026 23147 700.00 Vendor Subtotal: 700.00
103-30-4492-0003 U.S. Bank Galls-Uniform Pants 09/30/2026 23147 186.76 103-30-4492-0003 U.S. Bank Pasadena Embroidery-Uniform Polo Shirts 09/30/2026 23147 439.67 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 24 PAGE 77 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal: 626.43
103-30-4492-0004 U.S. Armor Corporation Ballistics Vest Ofc.Torres 09/04/2026 23104 881.34 Vendor Subtotal: 881.34
103-30-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service 7/15/26-8/14/26 PD 09/04/2026 23099 14.92 Vendor Subtotal: 14.92
103-30-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service 7/27/26-8/26/26 PD 09/18/2026 23113 4,723.62 Vendor Subtotal: 4,723.62
103-30-4500-9025 Charter Communications Cable Internet Service 8/1/26-8/31/26 PD 09/04/2026 23100 229.99 103-30-4500-9025 Charter Communications Cable Internet Service 9/1/26-9/30/26 PD 09/18/2026 23142 229.99 Vendor Subtotal: 459.98
103-30-4508-0000 Retro-Spec Printing Decals for PD Patrol Vehicles 09/04/2026 23091 1,120.04 103-30-4508-0000 Retro-Spec Printing Decals for PD Patrol Vehicles 09/04/2026 23091 3,360.12 103-30-4508-0000 Retro-Spec Printing Decals for PD Patrol Vehicles 09/04/2026 23091 1,097.89 Vendor Subtotal: 5,578.05
103-30-4508-0000 U.S. Bank Industrial Pipe- Pipe Replacement for Speed Trailer 09/30/2026 23147 20.59 103-30-4508-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Stencils for PD Cars 09/30/2026 23147 35.25 103-30-4508-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Lice Frogger 09/30/2026 23147 13.56 103-30-4508-0000 U.S. Bank Benlo-Leveling Blocks for Command Trailer 09/30/2026 23147 110.64 Vendor Subtotal: 180.04
103-34-4010-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium August 2026 09/04/2026 23058 -7.92 103-34-4010-0000 Ameritas Life Insurance Corp Adjustment Premium August 2026 09/04/2026 23058 -7.92 Vendor Subtotal: -15.84
103-34-4010-0000 Delta Dental of California Adjustment Premium Sept 2026 09/04/2026 23070 59.11 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 25 PAGE 78 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal: 59.11
103-34-4010-0000 PERS (Medical) Adjustment Premium Sept 2026 09/04/2026 0 -859.09 Vendor Subtotal: -859.09
103-34-4150-0000 City of Alhambra Fire Training Facility FY 26/27 09/04/2026 23065 5,109.23 Vendor Subtotal: 5,109.23
103-34-4150-0000 EMS QI Partners, LLC EMS Qi & Education August 2026 09/04/2026 0 2,499.16 0000001314 Vendor Subtotal: 2,499.16
103-34-4150-0000 Presidio Networked Solutions Group, LLC Cradlepoint Renewal 9/24/26-9/23/27 09/04/2026 23089 1,177.12 0000001316 Vendor Subtotal: 1,177.12
103-34-4150-0000 Santa Ana College Annual Wellness Fitness Test FD 09/04/2026 23093 1,232.00 Vendor Subtotal: 1,232.00
103-34-4150-0000 Wittman Enterprises LLC EMS Billing Service July 2026 09/18/2026 0 5,147.25 0000001307 Vendor Subtotal: 5,147.25
103-34-4204-0000 U.S. Bank Pasadena Star News-Subscription 8/16/26-9/12/26 09/30/2026 23147 12.00 103-34-4204-0000 U.S. Bank LA Times -Subscription 8/12/26-9/9/26 09/30/2026 23147 16.00 Vendor Subtotal: 28.00
103-34-4206-0000 Veritiv Operating Company Janitorial Supplies 09/04/2026 0 1,283.12 Vendor Subtotal: 1,283.12
103-34-4206-0000 U.S. Bank Westlake Ace-Maintenance Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 83.95 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 26 PAGE 79 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal: 83.95
103-34-4316-0000 Canon Financial Services Inc Copier Lease August 2026 FD 09/04/2026 0 117.37 0000001302 Vendor Subtotal: 117.37
103-34-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Contract Copier Base Rate Charge 8/13/26-9/12/26 FD 09/04/2026 0 103.73 0000001303 103-34-4316-0000 CopyFree Technology Inc Contract Copier Usages 5/13/26-8/12/26 FD 09/04/2026 0 13.59 0000001303 Vendor Subtotal: 117.32
103-34-4316-0000 Stryker Sales Corporation Procare Service Emergency Care 8/20/26-8/19/27 09/18/2026 23140 4,123.00 Vendor Subtotal: 4,123.00
103-34-4376-0000 Linde Gas & Equipment In Oxygen 09/04/2026 23082 190.12 103-34-4376-0000 Linde Gas & Equipment In Oxygen 09/18/2026 23128 190.12 Vendor Subtotal: 380.24
103-34-4376-0000 Office Depot Office Supplies 09/18/2026 23131 97.41 Vendor Subtotal: 97.41
103-34-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Flash Drives 09/30/2026 23147 65.16 103-34-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Primo Water- Bottle Water 09/30/2026 23147 3.10 103-34-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Primo Water- Bottle Water 09/30/2026 23147 3.10 103-34-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Smart & Final-Coffee Pots 09/30/2026 23147 71.80 103-34-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Primo Water- Bottle Water 09/30/2026 23147 3.10 103-34-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Water Filter 09/30/2026 23147 51.21 103-34-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Ralph-Bottle Water for Engine 09/30/2026 23147 63.51 103-34-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Smart & Final-Soap 09/30/2026 23147 13.99 103-34-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Charging Cord 09/30/2026 23147 9.32 Vendor Subtotal: 284.29
103-34-4396-0000 Foothill Fire Chiefs Association Annual Membership FY26/27 Chief Rueda 09/18/2026 23120 200.00 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 27 PAGE 80 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal: 200.00
103-34-4396-0000 Los Angeles Area Fire Chiefs' Assoc Membership Chief Rueda FY 26/27 09/04/2026 23075 1,500.00 Vendor Subtotal: 1,500.00
103-34-4396-0000 U.S. Bank Rotary Club-Quarterly Dues Chief Rueda 09/30/2026 23147 340.00 Vendor Subtotal: 340.00
103-34-4460-0003 Timothy Chow Per Diem Lodging 8/6/26 Ward Fire Strike Team09/04/2026 23064 146.88 103-34-4460-0003 Timothy Chow Per Diem Lodging 8/5/26 Ward Fire Strike Team09/04/2026 23064 124.85 103-34-4460-0003 Timothy Chow Per Diem Meals 8/5/26-8/6/26 Ward Fire Strike Team 09/04/2026 23064 127.00 103-34-4460-0003 Timothy Chow Per Diem Meals 8/11/26-8/13/26 Frijoles Fire Strike Team 09/04/2026 23064 292.00 103-34-4460-0003 Timothy Chow Per Diem Lodging 8/11/26 Frijoles Fire Strike Team 09/04/2026 23064 210.96 103-34-4460-0003 Timothy Chow Per Diem Lodging 8/12/26 -8/13/26 Frijoles Fire Strike 09/04/2026 Team 23064 385.14 Vendor Subtotal: 1,286.83
103-34-4460-0003 WEX Bank Fuel- 8/7/26-8/21/26 09/04/2026 23107 506.16 Vendor Subtotal: 506.16
103-34-4468-0000 National Assc.of EMS Educators Annual Dues-D.Tannehill 09/04/2026 23087 95.00 Vendor Subtotal: 95.00
103-34-4468-0000 U.S. Bank Emergency Medical Service-Paramedic License Fixsen 09/30/2026 23147 250.00 103-34-4468-0000 U.S. Bank Municipal Budgeting-Training J.Tsay 09/30/2026 23147 900.00 Vendor Subtotal: 1,150.00
103-34-4480-0000 U.S. Bank LAAFCA-Conference Registration J.Tsay 09/30/2026 23147 1,298.91 Vendor Subtotal: 1,298.91
103-34-4492-0004 U.S. Bank H3 Customs-Overhead Uniforms 09/30/2026 23147 127.15 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 28 PAGE 81 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal: 127.15
103-34-4500-4950 The Gas Company Gas Service 7/15/26-8/14/26 FD 09/04/2026 23099 141.43 Vendor Subtotal: 141.43
103-34-4500-9025 AT&T Phone Service 7/12/26-8/11/26 FD 09/18/2026 23113 65.19 Vendor Subtotal: 65.19
103-34-4500-9025 AT&T City Hall Compound Internet Service 8/11/26-9/10/26 FD 09/04/2026 23060 185.36 Vendor Subtotal: 185.36
103-34-4500-9025 AT&T Long Distance Long Distance Phone Service August 2026 FD09/04/2026 23061 52.06 Vendor Subtotal: 52.06
103-34-4500-9025 U.S. Bank Ring Central-8/17/26-9/16/26 FD 09/30/2026 23147 23.76 Vendor Subtotal: 23.76
103-34-4500-9025 Verizon Wireless Mobile Computer Service 7/24/26-8/23/26 FD09/18/2026 23145 299.74 Vendor Subtotal: 299.74
103-34-4508-0000 A1 Automotive Service Inc A/C Replace FD BC Vehicle 09/18/2026 23110 1,855.38 Vendor Subtotal: 1,855.38
103-34-4508-0000 Puretec Industrial Water Mixed Bed Water Tank Rental Sept 2026 09/18/2026 23136 21.68 Vendor Subtotal: 21.68
103-34-4508-0000 U.S. Bank Home Depot-Cord Ends for Replace on Charger RA 91 09/30/2026 23147 27.60 103-34-4508-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-RA91 Key Fob Batteries 09/30/2026 23147 10.71 103-34-4508-0000 U.S. Bank Amazon-Car Wash Brush 09/30/2026 23147 39.40 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 29 PAGE 82 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal: 77.71
Subtotal for Fund: 103 58,835.60
202-48-4150-9020 Nationwide Environmental Service Street Sweeping Service August 2026 09/18/2026 23129 11,755.00 0000001317 Vendor Subtotal: 11,755.00
Subtotal for Fund: 202 11,755.00
207-11-4208-1330 City of Pasadena Dial-A-Ride Service 4th Quarter 09/04/2026 23067 3,780.00 Vendor Subtotal: 3,780.00
207-30-4150-0000 All City Management Services Inc School Crossing Guard Service 8/2/26-8/15/2609/04/2026 0 3,499.70 Vendor Subtotal: 3,499.70
Subtotal for Fund: 207 7,279.70
223-30-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Right of Way-Traffic Safety Cones 09/30/2026 23147 399.30 223-30-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Full Source-Traffic Safety Vests 09/30/2026 23147 481.32 223-30-4376-0000 U.S. Bank Harbor Freight-Portable Generator 09/30/2026 23147 866.53 Vendor Subtotal: 1,747.15
Subtotal for Fund: 223 1,747.15
233-30-4150-0500 Foothill Communications Inc Command Post Trailer Dispatch Radio Installation 09/18/2026 23119 1,425.50 Vendor Subtotal: 1,425.50
233-30-4399-0000 LensLock Inc LensLock Body Worn Camera 11/1/26-10/31/2709/04/2026 0 58,230.06 0000001320 Vendor Subtotal: 58,230.06
AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 30 PAGE 83 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Subtotal for Fund: 233 59,655.56
246-48-4150-9020 Nationwide Environmental Service Street Sweeping Service August 2026 09/18/2026 23129 19,756.25 0000001317 Vendor Subtotal: 19,756.25
Subtotal for Fund: 246 19,756.25
281-90-4399-1120 U.S. Bank Amazon-Light Bulbs for Crain Art Cabinet 09/30/2026 23147 19.74 Vendor Subtotal: 19.74
281-91-4150-2575 Helane Rheinhold Art Program 9/23/26 09/04/2026 23092 350.00 Vendor Subtotal: 350.00
281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 09/18/2026 0 91.95 0000001306 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 09/18/2026 0 50.44 0000001306 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 09/18/2026 0 372.56 0000001306 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 09/18/2026 0 23.48 0000001306 281-91-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 09/18/2026 0 62.88 0000001306 Vendor Subtotal: 601.31
281-91-4370-0000 OverDrive Inc eBooks 09/18/2026 23133 247.93 281-91-4370-0000 OverDrive Inc eBooks 09/18/2026 23133 75.00 281-91-4370-0000 OverDrive Inc eBooks 09/18/2026 23133 418.98 Vendor Subtotal: 741.91
281-91-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Books 09/04/2026 0 219.96 0000001306 281-91-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Books 09/04/2026 0 50.39 0000001306 281-91-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Books 09/04/2026 0 80.77 0000001306 281-91-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Books 09/04/2026 0 89.34 0000001306 281-91-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Books 09/04/2026 0 435.91 0000001306 281-91-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Books 09/04/2026 0 87.35 0000001306 281-91-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Books 09/04/2026 0 28.76 0000001306 281-91-4370-2575 Ingram Library Services Books 09/18/2026 0 190.75 0000001306 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 31 PAGE 84 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Vendor Subtotal: 1,183.23
281-91-4370-2575 Tsai Fong Books Inc Books 09/04/2026 23103 255.20 281-91-4370-2575 Tsai Fong Books Inc Books 09/18/2026 23143 143.04 281-91-4370-2575 Tsai Fong Books Inc Books 09/18/2026 23143 326.49 281-91-4370-2575 Tsai Fong Books Inc Books 09/18/2026 23143 77.67 Vendor Subtotal: 802.40
281-91-4376-2575 Lucas Holdings, LLC Laufey Library Cards 09/04/2026 23083 475.49 Vendor Subtotal: 475.49
281-91-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Laufey Day Program Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 22.05 281-91-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Remainders Creative-Sewing Program Supplies09/30/2026 23147 107.46 281-91-4376-2575 U.S. Bank 4Imprints-Library Card Sign Up Giveaway 09/30/2026 23147 377.30 281-91-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Summer Reading Prize Books 09/30/2026 23147 273.62 Vendor Subtotal: 780.43
281-92-4370-0000 Cavendish Square Books 09/18/2026 23115 224.42 Vendor Subtotal: 224.42
281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 09/04/2026 0 42.66 0000001306 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 09/04/2026 0 51.76 0000001306 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 09/04/2026 0 15.52 0000001306 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 09/04/2026 0 488.00 0000001306 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 09/18/2026 0 108.85 0000001306 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 09/18/2026 0 627.87 0000001306 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 09/18/2026 0 91.81 0000001306 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 09/18/2026 0 12.53 0000001306 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 09/18/2026 0 722.65 0000001306 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 09/18/2026 0 166.12 0000001306 281-92-4370-0000 Ingram Library Services Books 09/18/2026 0 22.16 0000001306 Vendor Subtotal: 2,349.93
281-92-4370-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Book 09/30/2026 23147 16.51 AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 32 PAGE 85 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 281-92-4370-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Book 09/30/2026 23147 17.55 Vendor Subtotal: 34.06
281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank 4Imprints-Library Card Sign Up Giveaway 09/30/2026 23147 377.31 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Salt & Straws-YA Ice Cream Taste Test 09/30/2026 23147 62.50 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Domino's Pizza TAG Meeting 09/30/2026 23147 47.75 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Sticker Palooza Program Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 87.07 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Steam in the Sun Program Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 14.14 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Summer Reading Club Prizes 09/30/2026 23147 43.85 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon -YA Ice Cream Taste Test Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 16.88 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon -YA Ice Cream Taste Test Supplies 09/30/2026 23147 49.29 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Raffle Tickets Summer Reading Club09/30/2026 23147 9.76 281-92-4376-2575 U.S. Bank Amazon-Summer Reading Club Prizes 09/30/2026 23147 47.29 Vendor Subtotal: 755.84
Subtotal for Fund: 281 8,318.76
394-34-4600-1004 Control Fire & Security Repiping at Fire Station 09/18/2026 23117 17,950.00 Vendor Subtotal: 17,950.00
394-46-4600-8022 Premier Pipe Inc. Strom Drain Repair Wembley Ave 09/18/2026 23135 13,900.00 Vendor Subtotal: 13,900.00
394-48-4600-0520 Keystone Ridge Designs, Inc Trash Cans for Huntington Blvd & Mission St09/18/2026 23126 17,184.00 Vendor Subtotal: 17,184.00
394-48-4600-9272 U.S. Bank Amazon-IPad Case for Sidewalk Scanning 09/30/2026 23147 27.43 394-48-4600-9272 U.S. Bank Amazon-Sidewalk Project Ipad Cover 09/30/2026 23147 26.33 394-48-4600-9272 U.S. Bank Bestbuy-IPad Purchase for Sidewalk Screening09/30/2026 23147 1,328.90 Vendor Subtotal: 1,382.66
Subtotal for Fund: 394 50,416.66
AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 33 PAGE 86 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No 591-11-4613-0564 Dell Marketing LP Power Edge R670-Servers 09/18/2026 23118 123,682.41 0000001283 Vendor Subtotal: 123,682.41
Subtotal for Fund: 591 123,682.41
595-10-4356-0000 Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Service, LLC 25/26 Excess WC Final Audit 09/04/2026 0 18,087.00 Vendor Subtotal: 18,087.00
Subtotal for Fund: 595 18,087.00
596-10-4356-3412 CA JPIA Pollution Liability Insurance Program 2026-2709/18/2026 0 7,439.00 Vendor Subtotal: 7,439.00
Subtotal for Fund: 596 7,439.00
609-00-2002-0000 Metro Water Domestic Water July 2026 09/04/2026 0 120,964.65 Vendor Subtotal: 120,964.65
609-00-2048-0070 Jannet Lee Refund-Deposit SMCC Rental 7/14/26 09/18/2026 23109 500.00 Vendor Subtotal: 500.00
609-00-2048-2575 Friends of Crowell Public Lib Credit Card Sales Friends Bookstore August 2026 09/18/2026 23122 1,188.50 Vendor Subtotal: 1,188.50
Subtotal for Fund: 609 122,653.15
700-44-4150-0000 Premier Pipe Inc. Removed Wedged Liner from Sewer Line 09/18/2026 23135 3,800.00 0000001318 700-44-4150-0000 Premier Pipe Inc. 3 ft Patch Repair on Sewer Kewen DR 09/18/2026 23135 4,850.00 0000001318 Vendor Subtotal: 8,650.00
AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 34 PAGE 87 of 358
Account Number Vendor Description GL Date Check No Amount PO No Subtotal for Fund: 700 8,650.00
Report Total: 1,297,483.95
AP-Transactions by Account (10/01/2026 - 10:13 AM) Page 35 PAGE 88 of 358
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Nia Calistro, City Clerk
DATE: October 14, 2026
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF MINUTES

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Engaged and Connected Residents
Efficient, Responsive, and Effective City Services
Fiscally Responsible and Transparent City Government

BACKGROUND
The City Council of the City of San Marino, at a Regular Meeting held on Wednesday, April 9, 2014, approved the action minute format for City Council and all Advisory Body meetings.

DISCUSSION
Attached for Council consideration are the following City Council Minutes:

Special Meeting of September 9, 2026;
Regular Meeting of September 9, 2026; and
Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 25, 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
None.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney's office has reviewed and approved as to form.

Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 89 of 358

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Council approve the September 2026 Minutes. If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
”I move to approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of September 9, 2026, the Regular Meeting of September 9, 2026, and the Adjourned Regular Meeting of September 25, 2026.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. Minutes of September 9, 2026 - Special Meeting

2. Minutes of September 9, 2026 - Regular Meeting

3. Minutes of September 25, 2026 - Adjourned Regular Meeting PAGE 90 of 358

MINUTES

SPECIAL MEETING

OF THE SAN MARINO CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2026 AT 4:00 PM

CITY HALL EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (EOC)

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Chou called the meeting to order at 4:07 p.m., in the City Hall Emergency Operations Center (EOC), located at 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino, CA 91108.

ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo, Mayor Chou ABSENT: None

CLOSED SESSION
At 4:07 p.m., the City Council recessed to closed session in the EOC to discuss the following items:

1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
GOVERNMENT CODE 54957(B)
Title: City Manager

2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
GOVERNMENT CODE 54957.6
City of San Marino Representative: Joe Montes, City Attorney Unrepresented Employee: City Manager

3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION
GOVERNMENT CODE 54956.9 (D)(1)
The City Council is meeting with respect to one (1) matter:

Name of Case: Craig Scott Muhlrad V. City of San Marino US District Court Central District of California Case No.:
2:21-cv-05491-JAK-JPR

4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED

LITIGATION
GOVERNMENT CODE 54956.9 (D)(2)
The City Council is meeting with respect to one (1) matter of significant exposure to litigation against the City.

5. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
GOVERNMENT CODE 54957.6
City Negotiator(s): City Manager Eskandar
Human Resources Director Guerrero
Employee Organization(s):

San Marino Police Officers’ Association
PAGE 91 of 358

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2026 PAGE 2 OF 2
San Marino Firefighters’ Association
San Marino Employees’ Association
Unrepresented Employees

RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
At 5:53 p.m. the City Council reconvened to open session.

CLOSED SESSION REPORT
The City Council met on Items 1 through 5 and there was no reportable action.

ADJOURNMENT
At 5:53 p.m., Mayor Chou adjourned the special meeting.

NIA CALISTRO

CITY CLERK
PAGE 92 of 358

MINUTES

REGULAR MEETING

OF THE SAN MARINO CITY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2026 AT 6:00 PM

CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Chou called the regular meeting to order at 6:23 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, located at 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino, California 91108.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Chou.

ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Mayor Chou, Vice Mayor Lo, Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Council Member Shepherd Romey
ABSENT: None

PUBLIC COMMENTS
The following person(s) provided comment:
- Soumya Sriraman

CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
City Manager Eskandar gave the report.

PRESENTATION
SAN MARINO NATIONAL LITTLE LEAGUE SOFTBALL 12U ALL STARS Mayor Chou gave the presentation.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Council Member Chang moved, seconded by Council Member Chou to approve items of the Consent Calendar except Item 5, and approve Item 12 to reflect Council Member Chang abstained from voting on Item 4 of the Regular City Council Meeting on July 8, 2026, and approve Item 19, to reflect a revised recommendation to City Council, incorporating budget adjustments and corresponding account numbers, as amended.

Motion passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo, Mayor Chou
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
PAGE 93 of 358

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2026 PAGE 2 OF 6
ABSENT: None
Council Member Shepherd Romey pulled Consent Calendar Item 5.

Director Figueroa gave the report.

Council Member Shepherd Romey moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Lo to approve Item 5 of the Consent Calendar.

Motion passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo, Mayor Chou
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

3. AWARD OF A MAINTENANCE SERVICES AGREEMENT TO G2
CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATION OF

CATCH BASIN TRASH AND DEBRIS CAPTURE DEVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $200,000
The City Council approved a Maintenance Services Agreement for the procurement and installation of trash and debris capture devices in County-owned catch basins from G2 Construction, Inc. in the amount of $200,000.

4. APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF JOHN DEERE BACKHOE IN THE AMOUNT OF $174,274.89 FOR THE PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The City Council approved the purchase of one John Deere 310 P Backhoe Loader from John Deere Equipment in the amount of $174,274.89.

5. APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE CODE GROUP, INC. DBA VCA CODE FOR BUILDING

PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION SERVICES AND RELATED BUDGET

ADJUSTMENTS
The City Council approved the Fiscal Year 2025026 VCA Code expenditures and related budget adjustments; approved Amendment No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with The Code Group, Inc. dba VCA code; approved the Fiscal Year 2026- 27 budget adjustments; and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment.

6. APPROVAL OF PROCUREMENT OF LIBRARY MATERIALS FROM INGRAM

CONTENT GROUP FOR THE CROWELL PUBLIC LIBRARY
The City Council approved the procurement of library materials from Ingram Content Group in an amount not to exceed eighty-two thousand five hundred fifty-seven dollars ($82,557) for FY 2026-2027.

7. APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF BUS STOP FURNITURE, EQUIPMENT, AND

IMPROVEMENTS THROUGH PROP A FUNDING
The City Council approved the procurement of bus stop furnishings from Keystone Ridge Designs in the amount of $78,640.35.

PAGE 94 of 358

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2026 PAGE 3 OF 6

8. APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT WITH USI INSURANCE SERVICES LLC FOR

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS BROKERAGE AND BENEFIT PLAN SERVICES
The City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a contract with USI Insurance Services LLC for Employee Benefits Brokerage services for a five (5) year term in the amount not to exceed $75,000 and to exercise options subject to satisfactory performance and budget allocation.

9. APPROVAL TO PURCHASE PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT FROM MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $54,620 THROUGH A

COOPERATIVE PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH SOURCEWELL
The City Council approved the purchase of personal protective equipment from Municipal Emergency Services in the amount of $54,620.07 through a cooperative purchasing agreement with Sourcewell.

10.APPROVAL OF A $10,500 FY 2026-27 BUDGET ADJUSTMENT FOR DEBTBOOK

CONTRACT
The City Council approved a FY 2026-27 budget adjustment of $10,500 to Account #101-11-4150-0500.

11.ACCEPTANCE OF CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT PROGRAM (CTFGP) FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $140,078.23 AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. R-26-29 The City Council approved and authorized the Chief of Police and the City Manager or their designee to enter into the agreement with the California Highway Patrol in an amount not to exceed $140,078.23, approve budget adjustments as needed, and adopt Resolution No. R-26-29.

12.REPORT OF EMERGENCY ACTIONS TAKEN TO REPAIR/REMEDIATE FIRE STATION 91

AND REQUEST FOR NECESSARY BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS AND TO EXTEND EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT PURSUANT TO PUBLIC CONTRACTS CODE SECTION 22060 AND SAN MARINO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.06.05(A)(8)
The City Council moved to 1) receive and file the report of repair/remediation actions undertaken to date; 2) approve a FY 2026-27 budget adjustment of $17,950 to Account No. 394-34-4600-1004-Fire Station Improvements account and a budget adjustment of $82,050 to Account No. 103-34-4206-0000 to cover the two invoices and few miscellaneous expenses; and 3) to extend the emergency action approved in Resolution No. R-26-08 to facilitate the expeditious restoration of Fire Station 91.

PAGE 95 of 358

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2026 PAGE 4 OF 6

13.MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION AND COST

SHARING FOR IMPLEMENTING THE COORDINATED INTEGRATED MONITORING

PROGRAM (CIMP) AND WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (WMP) FOR THE

UPPER LOS ANGELES RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AREA
The City Council moved to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement between the City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Flood Control District, the Cities of Alhambra, Burbank, Calabasas, Glendale, Hidden Hills, La Canada Flintridge, Montebello, Monterey Park, Pasadena, Rosemead, San Fernando, San Gabriel, San Marino, South El Monte, South Pasadena, Temple City, and the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments regarding the administration and cost sharing for implementing the Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program (CIMP) and Watershed Management Program (WMP) for the Upper Los Angeles River Watershed for FY 2026-27 through FY 2028-29 and authorized the City Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City, as well as execute two additional one-year extensions subject to the necessary budget application.

14.ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. R-26-30, UPDATING THE CONFLICT OF

INTEREST CODE OF THE CITY OF SAN MARINO
The City Council adopted Resolution No. R-26-30, updating the Conflict of Interest Code of the City of San Marino.

15.CASH AND INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE 2026 The City Council received and filed the report for the Month of June 2026.

16.CASH AND INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE MONTH OF JULY 2026 The City Council received and filed the report for the Month of July 2026.

17.RECEIVE AND FILE THE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS REPORT FOR JULY 2026 The City Council received and filed the report for the Month of July 2026.

18.RECEIVE AND FILE THE MONTHLY DISBURSEMENTS REPORT FOR AUGUST 2026
The City Council received and filed the report for the Month of August 2026.

19.APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The City Council approved the Minutes of the Special Meeting of June 10, 2026, the Regular Meeting of June 10, 2026, the Adjourned Regular Meeting of June 26, 2026, and the Regular Meeting of July 8, 2026.

NEW BUSINESS

1. FALL 2026 PUBLIC TREE REMOVAL LIST
PAGE 96 of 358

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2026 PAGE 5 OF 6
Director Shah presented the staff report.

The following person(s) provided public comment:
- Lakshmi Reddy
- Peter Harnisch
Council Member Chang moved, seconded by Council Member Shepherd Romey to remove the following trees from the Fall 2026 Public Tree Removal List: 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, and 21.

Motion passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Member Chang, Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo
NOES: Council Member Chou, Mayor Chou
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Council Member Shepherd Romey recused herself from tree #2, located at 1101 Lorain Road.

Council Member Chang moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Lo to remove tree #2, located at 1101 Lorain Road, from the Fall 2026 Public Tree Removal List, and monitor it until the City Council’s next annual meeting regarding public tree removal.

Motion did not pass by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

Council Member Chang, Vice Mayor Lo
Council Member Chou, Mayor Chou
ABSTAIN: Council Member Shepherd Romey
ABSENT: None
Council Member Chou moved, seconded by Council Member Chang to keep tree #2 and, under the guidance of the arborist, look at what can be done to mitigate risk to the greatest extent possible while retaining the tree and continue to monitor the tree until staff reports on its condition during the next Public Tree Removal report.

Motion passed by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Vice Mayor Lo Mayor Chou
ABSTAIN: Council Member Shepherd Romey
ABSENT: None

2. APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LOC ARCHITECTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $135,330 FOR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN

SERVICES FOR THE LACY PARK OFFICE RENOVATION PROJECT
Director Shah gave the presentation.

PAGE 97 of 358

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2026 PAGE 6 OF 6
The following person(s) provided comment:
- None
Council Member Chou moved, seconded by Council Member Chang to approve a Professional Services Agreement for architectural design services for the Lacy Park Office Renovation project with LOC, Inc. in the amount of $135,330 and authorized the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City.

Motion passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo, Mayor Chou
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None.

ADJOURNMENT
At 8:10 p.m., Council Member Shepherd Romey requested a special adjournment in memory of John Snaer and W. Michael Johnson, and Council Member Chou requested a special adjournment in memory of Robert Gerald Twist, to Friday, September 25, at 8:30 a.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers.

NIA CALISTRO

CITY CLERK
PAGE 98 of 358

MINUTES

ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING

OF THE SAN MARINO CITY COUNCIL
FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2026 AT 8:30 AM

CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS

CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Chou called the adjourned regular meeting to order at 8:31 a.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, located at 2200 Huntington Drive, San Marino, California 91108.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Chou.

ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo, Mayor
Chou
ABSENT: None

PUBLIC COMMENTS
The following person(s) provided comment:
- Cori Solan
- Alisa Yingling

CONSENT CALENDAR
Council Member Shepherd Romey moved, seconded by Council Member Chang, to approve Items 1 through 4 of the consent calendar.

Motion passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo, Mayor Chou
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

1. APPROVAL OF PURCHASE ORDER IN THE AMOUNT OF $45,000 TO LIFEASSIST, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE OF PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES AND

EQUIPMENT
The City Council approved a purchase order to Life-Assist, Inc. in the amount of $45,000 for the purchase of paramedic supplies and equipment.

PAGE 99 of 358

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2026 PAGE 2 OF 4

2. APPROVAL TO WAIVE SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT FEES FOR THE SAN

MARINO HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION GATHERING IN LACY PARK
The City Council waived the Special Event Permit fees associated with the San Marino High School Alumni Association Gathering in November of 2026.

3. APPROVAL OF A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED

CITY MANAGER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
The City Council approved the Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated City Manager Employment Agreement Between the City of San Marino and Philippe Eskandar.

4.REPORT OF EMERGENCY ACTIONS TAKEN TO REPAIR/REMEDIATE FIRE STATION 91 AND REQUEST TO EXTEND EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT
PURSUANT TO PUBLIC CONTRACTS CODE SECTION 22050 AND SAN MARINO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.06.05(A)(8)
The City Council 1) received and filed the report of repair/remediation actions undertaken to date and 2) extended the emergency action approved in Resolution No. R-26-08 to facilitate the expeditious restoration of Fire Station 91.

PUBLIC HEARING

5. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL FOR DESIGN REVIEW CASE NO. DR 22- 26 AT 535 OLD MILL ROAD TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING 1,751 SQUARE-FOOT RESIDENCE AND CONSTRUCT A NEW TWO-STORY 2,690 SQUARE-FOOT

RESIDENCE WITH A DETACHED TWO-CAR GARAGE (CHAN)
Director Figueroa provided the staff report.

The following person(s) provided public testimony:
- Richard McDonald, Esq.
- Patrick Szurpicki
- Carolyn Chapman
- Jose Villegas
- John Dustin
Council Member Shepherd Romey moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Lo to deny Design Review Case Number DR-22-26 at 535 Old Mill Road to demolish an existing 1,751 square foot single-family residence and construct a 2,690 square foot two-story residence with a detached 2-car garage.

Motion did not pass by the following vote:

AYES: Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo
NOES: Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Mayor Chou ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None PAGE 100 of 358

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2026 PAGE 3 OF 4
Council Member Chang moved, seconded by Council Member Chou to adopt City Council Resolution No. R-26-21 approving the project as presented and find that the proposed project meets the required findings and determined that based on the whole of the administrative record that the proposed addition is exempt from CEQA pursuant to state CEQA Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1 and Class 3 and that there is no substantial evidence demonstrating an exception to the categorical exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2, as amended, to incorporate a traffic and parking mitigation plan prior to the issuance of the building permit.

Motion passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Member Chang, Council Member Chou, Mayor Chou NOES: Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
Mayor Chou called for a recess at 10:19 a.m.

Mayor Chou called the meeting to order at 10:28 a.m.

NEW BUSINESS

6. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S DECISION TO DENY DESIGN REVIEW CASE NO. DR22-25 AT 1469 BRADBURY ROAD TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING 1,944 SQUARE-FOOT RESIDENCE AND CONSTRUCT A NEW TWO-STORY 2,810 SQUARE-FOOT RESIDENCE WITH A

DETACHED TWO-CAR GARAGE (CHAN)
Director Figueroa provided the staff report.

The following person(s) provided comment:
- Richard McDonald, Esq.
- Michael Rizzo
- Andrea Chiang
Council Member Shepherd Romey moved, seconded by Vice Mayor Lo to adopt City Council Resolution No. PCR 26-06 to deny Design Review Case Number DR-22-25 at 1469 Bradbury Road to demolish an existing 1,944 square foot single-family residence and construct a 2,810 square foot two-story residence with a detached 2-car garage.

The motion passed by the following vote:

AYES: Council Member Chang, Council Member Shepherd Romey, Vice Mayor Lo
NOES: Council Member Chou, Mayor Chou
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
PAGE 101 of 358

CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2026 PAGE 4 OF 4

WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS OR PUBLIC WRITINGS DISTRIBUTION
The following person(s) provided written communications or public writings:
- None

FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
The following item(s) were requested:
- None

ADJOURNMENT
At 10:11 a.m., Mayor Chou requested a special adjournment in honor of Scott Cameron, to Wednesday, October 14, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers.

NIA CALISTRO

CITY CLERK
PAGE 102 of 358
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Philippe Eskandar, City Manager
BY: Amber Shah, Parks & Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: October 14, 2026
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. R-26-35 ADOPTING THE

UPDATED ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR

SPEED LIMITS (E&TS) AND ESTABLISHING, RETAINING,

MODIFYING, AND REDUCING SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN

STREETS WITHIN THE CITY

STRATEGIC PLAN CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
Safe Community
Well-Maintained Infrastructure

BACKGROUND
The City periodically conducts Engineering and Traffic Surveys for Speed Limits (E&TS) to evaluate existing speed-limit zones and determine whether adjustments are warranted based on current roadway and traffic conditions.

E&TSs are prepared in accordance with applicable California Vehicle Code (CVC) requirements and State procedures governing the establishment, review, and enforcement of speed limits.

Hartzog & Crabill Inc. (HCI), one of the City’s on-call traffic engineering consultants, recently completed an updated E&TS for selected streets throughout the City. The updated E&TS was completed in advance of the expiration of the City’s existing speed-limit survey in 2027.

The E&TS evaluated sixty-five (65) roadway segments on forty (40) different roadways throughout the City. The study included collection of prevailing speed data and evaluation of roadway, traffic, and roadside conditions, as applicable. The results provide the engineering basis for the proposed Tony Chou, Mayor
Calvin Lo, Vice Mayor
Hunter Chang, Council Member
John Chou, Council Member
Gretchen Shepherd Romey, Council Member
PAGE 103 of 358
establishment, retention, modification, and reduction of speed limits on selected City streets.

The E&TS findings and recommended speed-limit changes are presented below for City Council consideration. An accompanying resolution has been prepared to establish the applicable speed-limit zones in accordance with Article 15.05 of the San Marino Municipal Code and applicable State law.

DISCUSSION
Engineering and Traffic Survey
The updated E&TS evaluated sixty-five (65) roadway segments on forty (40) different roadways throughout the City. The evaluation considered prevailing vehicle speeds, collision history, roadway characteristics, pedestrian and bicycle activity, sight distance, and consistency with adjacent roadway segments. The study also included field review by a Registered Traffic Engineer.

California's speed-zoning framework is generally based on the principle that speed limits should reflect the speed at which the majority of drivers can reasonably and safely travel under prevailing roadway conditions. The 85thpercentile speed is one of the primary measures used in an E&TS because it represents the speed at or below which approximately 85 percent of observed vehicles are traveling under free-flow conditions. This methodology is intended to establish speed limits that are reasonable and promote voluntary compliance by the majority of motorists.

Speed data for an E&TS is generally collected during off-peak periods on an average weekday when traffic is free-flowing and individual vehicle speeds can be measured without significant influence from congestion or other unusual conditions. The resulting speed data is analyzed to determine the 85thpercentile speed and other applicable statistical measures. Under the State's speed-zoning framework, the posted speed limit is generally established at the nearest five-mile-per-hour increment to the 85th-percentile speed, subject to applicable statutory provisions and adjustments based on roadway, traffic, and safety conditions.

Where unusual or extreme conditions exist, State law provides mechanisms for establishing a lower speed limit when supported by the required engineering evaluation. The updated E&TS therefore considered not only prevailing speeds, but also roadway characteristics, collision history, pedestrian and bicycle activity, sight distance, and other conditions that may warrant a speed limit different from the speed indicated by prevailing traffic speeds alone.

PAGE 104 of 358
Assembly Bill 43
Since the City's previous E&TS was completed in 2020, California law has been amended to provide local agencies with additional options when establishing and maintaining speed limits. Assembly Bill (AB) 43 became effective January 1, 2022, and amended the State's speed-zoning provisions to provide additional flexibility when establishing speed limits based on an E&TS.

Among other provisions, AB 43 provides additional statutory basis for consideration of a 5-mph speed-limit reduction under the following circumstances:
• Safety Corridor: A roadway segment designated as a Safety Corridor based on applicable collision data and criteria. Safety Corridors are limited to no more than 20 percent of the streets maintained by the local agency.
• High Concentrations of Pedestrians and/or Bicyclists: A roadway segment with facilities that generate high concentrations of pedestrian and/or bicycle activity. Examples of such facilities include schools, parks, medical facilities, religious centers, and shopping centers. The potential 5-mph reduction applies only to the portion of the roadway within 1,320 feet of the qualifying facility.

Where a speed-limit reduction is proposed under these provisions, the E&TS must document the conditions and justification supporting the lower speed limit, and the determination must be approved by a Registered Civil Engineer or Traffic Engineer. The updated E&TS incorporated these provisions into its evaluation of the City's roadway segments.

AB 43 also provides a mechanism for a local agency to retain an existing speed limit following completion of an E&TS when specified statutory requirements are satisfied. In general, the existing speed limit may be retained when it was previously established based on an E&TS, the updated E&TS determines that the existing speed limit remains appropriate, and a registered engineer determines that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since the prior E&TS. This provision provides local agencies with an additional means of maintaining an existing speed limit rather than increasing the limit based solely on prevailing speed data.

The updated E&TS considered these provisions when evaluating existing speed limits and developing recommendations for the roadway segments included in the study.

PAGE 105 of 358
Safety Corridors
Based on the collision data and applicable AB 43 criteria, the E&TS recommends designation of three roadway segments as Safety Corridors:
• Garfield Avenue from Huntington Drive to Monterey Road; • Huntington Drive from Garfield Avenue to Virginia Road; and • Los Robles Avenue from the north City limit to Monterey Road.

These segments total approximately 2.16 miles, which is within the 20- percent limitation applicable to City-maintained streets. The Safety Corridor designations provide an additional basis for consideration of a 5-mph speedlimit reduction where recommended by the E&TS.

Residence Districts
The E&TS identifies thirty (30) roadway segments that qualify as a “Residence District” under CVC Section 515 and are therefore subject to a 25-mph prima facie speed limit. The E&TS recommends establishing or retaining the 25-mph speed limit on qualifying segments and reducing existing posted speed limits to 25 mph where applicable.

Because the 25-mph speed limit in a qualifying Residence District is a statutory prima facie speed limit, continued speed surveys are not required to establish the applicable prima facie limit.

Existing Speed Limits
The E&TS recommends no change to the existing speed limit on fifteen (15) roadway segments. These recommendations are generally based on measured 85th-percentile speeds and 10-mph pace speeds that remain consistent with the existing posted limits, together with consideration of roadway conditions, collision history, pedestrian and bicycle activity, Safety Corridor designations, and continuity between adjacent roadway segments.

The updated E&TS also considered the additional authority provided under AB 43 to retain an existing speed limit when the applicable statutory requirements are satisfied. At locations where the existing speed limit remains appropriate and the requirements for retaining the existing limit are met, the E&TS recommends maintaining the current posted speed limit.

New Speed-Limit Postings
The E&TS recommends establishing posted speed limits on eleven (11) roadway segments that are currently unposted. The recommended speed limits are primarily 25 mph, with a 35-mph recommendation for the westbound segment of Huntington Drive between Virginia Road and San PAGE 106 of 358
Marino Avenue. Three (3) of these locations also qualify for establishment as Residence Districts.

Speed-Limit Reductions
The E&TS recommends speed-limit reductions on twenty-three (23) roadway segments. The recommendations are based on the survey results and, where applicable, additional roadway and traffic conditions, including horizontal and vertical curves, limited sight distance, collision history, pedestrian and bicycle activity, Safety Corridor designations, and consistency with adjacent roadway segments.

Ten (10) of the recommended reductions involve roadway segments that also qualify for establishment as Residence Districts. The updated E&TS also considered the additional 5-mph reduction provisions established by AB 43 for Safety Corridors and roadway segments with high concentrations of bicyclists and/or pedestrians, as applicable.

Public Input
The draft E&TS report was presented at the September 21, 2026, meeting of the Public Safety Commission. The Commission unanimously supported and recommended adoption of the E&TS by the City Council. In addition, based upon comments and feedback received at the meeting, the recommendations for Monterey Road have been updated to extend the establishment of a Residence District from Old Mill Road to Virigina Road with a 25-mph prima facie speed limit and reduce the speed limit to 30-mph from Virigina Road to Huntington Drive.

The draft report was also posted on the City’s website and included in the City’s Weekly Briefing emails.

Summary
The updated E&TS provides the City with a current engineering evaluation of speed conditions on selected City streets and identifies recommended changes to speed-limit postings and designations. The study incorporates the applicable requirements of the California Vehicle Code and State procedures governing speed-limit establishment and enforcement, including the additional speed-limit reduction and speed-limit retention provisions available to local agencies under AB 43.

Staff have prepared an accompanying resolution for City Council consideration that would establish, retain, modify, or reduce speed limits on the roadway segments identified in the E&TS. Upon adoption of the resolution, staff will coordinate the installation or modification of the applicable speed-limit signage.

PAGE 107 of 358

FISCAL IMPACT & PROCUREMENT REVIEW
The estimated cost to install the new speed limit signs is $5,500. Sufficient funds are budgeted in the Annual Striping, Signing, and Marking Program in Account #394-48-4600-9273 for FY 26-27 to complete the upgrades associated with this project. No additional appropriation is necessary.

LEGAL REVIEW
The City Attorney’s office has reviewed and approved as to form.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend that the City Council approve Resolution No. R-26-35 adopting the updated Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits (E&TS) prepared by Hartzog & Crabill, Inc., and establishing, retaining, modifying, and reducing speed limits on certain City streets consistent with E&TS recommendations and authorize staff to implement the approved speed-limit changes, including the installation, modification, or removal of applicable speed-limit signage consistent with the adopted Resolution and the E&TS recommendations.

If the City Council concurs with staff’s recommendation, an appropriate motion would be:
”I move to approve Resolution No. R-26-35 adopting the updated Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits (E&TS) prepared by Hartzog & Crabill, Inc., and establishing, retaining, modifying, and reducing speed limits on certain City streets consistent with E&TS recommendations and authorize staff to implement the approved speed-limit changes, including the installation, modification, or removal of applicable speed-limit signage consistent with the adopted Resolution and the E&TS recommendations.”

ATTACHMENTS

1. Draft Resolution No. R-26-35

2. Engineering & Traffic Survey for Speed Limits prepared by Hartzog & Crabill, Inc., dated October 2026
PAGE 108 of 358
1 RESOLUTION NO. R-26-35

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

OF SAN MARINO, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE

UPDATED ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR

SPEED LIMITS AND ESTABLISHING, RETAINING,

MODIFYING AND REDUCING SPEED LIMITS ON

CERTAIN STREETS WITHIN THE CITY
WHEREAS, Chapter 15, Article 05, of the San Marino Municipal Code requires that speed limit zone studies shall be conducted in the times and in the manner prescribed by California State law and that the results of such studies be presented to the City Council; and WHEREAS, Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. (“HCI”), the City’s traffic engineering consultant, prepared an updated Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits (“E&TS”) for selected streets within the City in accordance with applicable provisions of the California Vehicle Code (“CVC”), including CVC Sections 40802 and 627, and applicable State procedures and guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the E&TS evaluated sixty-five (65) roadway segments on forty (40) different roadways throughout the City and considered prevailing vehicle speeds, collision history, roadway characteristics, pedestrian and bicycle activity, sight distance, and consistency with adjacent roadway segments, as applicable; and
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code Sections 22357 and 22358, together with other applicable provisions of State law, establish the requirements and authority for local authorities to establish and modify speed limits based upon engineering and traffic considerations and applicable Engineering and Traffic Survey; and
WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 43 (“AB 43”), effective January 1, 2022, amended the California Vehicle Code to provide additional statutory authority for local agencies to establish speed limits, including provisions addressing Safety Corridors, roadway segments with high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, and the retention of certain existing speed limits when specified requirements are satisfied; and
WHEREAS, the E&TS evaluated roadway segments for designation as Safety Corridors and identified three (3) roadway segments recommended for such designation, consistent with applicable State law and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (“CA MUTCD”); and
WHEREAS, the E&TS identified thirty (30) roadway segments that qualify as a “Residence District” pursuant to California Vehicle Code Section 515 and are therefore subject to a 25-mile-per-hour prima facie speed limit; and
WHEREAS, the E&TS recommends that the existing speed limits remain unchanged on certain roadway segments, that speed limits be established on currently unposted roadway segments, and that speed limits be reduced on certain roadway segments based upon prevailing speeds and consideration of roadway, traffic, and safety conditions; and PAGE 109 of 358
2 WHEREAS, the E&TS recommends the establishment, retention, modification, or reduction of speed limits on the roadway segments identified in the Summary of Recommendations 2026, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, the E&TS prepared by HCI, dated October 2026, is on file with the City’s Department of Parks and Public Works and provides the engineering basis for the speed limits established, retained, modified, and reduced by this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the E&TS, the recommendations contained therein, and the applicable requirements of State law and finds that adoption of the E&TS and the speed limits identified in Exhibit A are appropriate and in the public interest.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MARINO, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference.

SECTION 2. The Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits prepared by Hartzog & Crabill, Inc., dated October 2026, and on file with the City’s Department of Parks and Public Works, is hereby adopted and approved as the engineering basis for the speed limits established, retained, modified, and reduced pursuant to this Resolution.

SECTION 3. The speed limits identified in the Summary of Recommendations 2026, attached hereto as Exhibit A, are hereby established, retained, modified, or reduced, as applicable, for the roadway segments identified therein. The speed limits set forth in Exhibit A are determined to be appropriate based upon the E&TS and applicable requirements of State law.

SECTION 4. The Parks and Public Works Director/City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to cause the installation, modification, relocation, or removal of regulatory speedlimit signs as necessary to implement the speed limits established by this Resolution, in accordance with applicable provisions of the California Vehicle Code and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD).

SECTION 5. The speed limits established or reduced pursuant to this Resolution shall become effective upon installation of the required regulatory speed-limit signs in accordance with applicable provisions of the California Vehicle Code.

SECTION 6. The City Council finds and determines that adoption of this Resolution is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 3), because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and does not constitute a project as defined by CEQA.

SECTION 7. To the extent applicable, all prior resolutions, ordinances, and orders establishing speed limits on the roadway segments identified in Exhibit A are hereby amended, superseded, or otherwise modified to the extent necessary to conform to the speed limits PAGE 110 of 358
CITY OF SAN MARINO RESOLUTION NO. R-26-35
PAGE 3 OF 3
3 established, retained, modified, or reduced by this Resolution.

SECTION 8. The Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits prepared by Hartzog & Crabill, Inc., dated October 2026, is hereby adopted as supporting documentation for this Resolution and shall remain on file with the City’s Department of Parks and Public Works.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of San Marino, California, on this 14th day of October, 2026. ______________________________________

TONY CHOU
MAYOR
ATTEST:
__________________________________

NIA CALISTRO

CITY CLERK

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss.

CITY OF SAN MARINO )
I, Nia Calistro, City Clerk of the City of San Marino, California, hereby certify that Resolution No R-26-35 was adopted by the City Council of the City of San Marino at a Regular Meeting held on the 14th day of October, 2026, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
________________________________

NIA CALISTRO

CITY CLERK
PAGE 111 of 358
27 C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 2026

STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

ALHAMBRA ROAD
1 SHERWOOD RD TO
VIRGINIA RD 25 NB 25 26.4 23.7 21-30 94.7 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE / POST SB ALLEN AVENUE 2 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO
ORLANDO RD 30 SB 30 32.9 29.4 25-34 83.6 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE / POST NB CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD 3 WEST CITY LIMIT TO
SIERRA MADRE BLVD 35 35 39.6 35.8 32-41 88.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 4 SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO
SAN GABRIEL BLVD 35 35 37.6 34.7 30-39 94.7 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE CANTERBURY ROAD 5 CALIFORNIA BLVD TO
SIERRA MADRE BLVD NP 25 33.0 29.2 25-34 87.2
POST & ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ] 6 SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO
SAN GABRIEL BLVD 25 25 26.7 24.1 21-30 93.5
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

CHELSEA ROAD
7 HUNTINGTON DR TO
SHERWOOD RD NP 25 29.9 27.1 23-32 95.4
POST & ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

DEL MAR AVENUE
8 HUNTINGTON DR TO
SOUTH CITY LIMIT 30 /*25 30 39.0 34.1 29-38 76.8 NO CHANGE – PREVENT 10 MPH JUMP IN SPEED DUARTE ROAD 9 LORAIN RD TO
SAN GABRIEL BLVD 25 25 30.9 27.2 23-32 94.1
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ] *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE NP = NOT POSTED, SB = SOUTHBOUND, NB = NORTHBOUND PAGE 112 of 358
28 STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

EL MOLINO AVENUE
10 NCL (80’ s/o Old Mill) TO
MONTEREY RD 25 25 31.1 27.8 24-33 89.9
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ] 11 MONTEREY RD TO
SCL (Huntington Dr) 25 25 34.1 30.4 25-34 81.4
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

EUSTON ROAD
12 VIRGINIA RD TO
WEMBLEY RD 25 25 27.2 24.3 22-31 96.7
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ] 13 WEMBLEY RD TO
SAN MARINO AVE 25 25 33.9 29.9 25-34 82.6 NO CHANGE – “HIGH PED & BIKE USERS”, CVC 22358.7(a)(2) GARFIELD AVENUE 14 MONTEREY RD TO
HUNTINGTON DR 35 30 38.3 34.9 31-40 90.6 REDUCE – "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) GRANADA AVENUE 15 WILSON AVE TO
HUNTINGTON DR 25 25 34.5 30.9 26-35 86.2
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ] 16 HUNTINGTON DR TO
ALHAMBRA RD 30 25 32.5 29.5 25-34 90.8
REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

HUNTINGTON DRIVE
17 EB – GARFIELD AVE TO
VIRGINIA RD 40 35 43.9 38.9 33-42 74.4 REDUCE – “SAFETY CORRIDOR”, CVC 22358.7(a)(1) 18 EB – VIRGINIA RD TO
SAN MARINO AVE 40 /*25 35 42.5 38.2 35-44 84.1 REDUCE – “HIGH PED & BIKE USERS”, CVC 22358.7(a)(2) 19 EB – SAN MARINO AVE TO
SAN GABRIEL BL 40 /*25 35 41.8 37.8 34-43 81.8 REDUCE – “HIGH PED & BIKE USERS”, CVC 22358.7(a)(2) 20 WB – GARFIELD AVE TO
VIRGINIA RD 40 35 43.8 39.7 35-44 83.6 REDUCE – “HIGH PED & BIKE USERS”, CVC 22358.7(a)(2) 21 WB – VIRGINIA RD TO
SAN MARINO AVE NP 35 42.6 38.6 35-44 88.2 POST & ESTABLISH – “HIGH PED & BIKE USERS”, CVC 22358.7(a)(2) 22 WB – SAN MARINO AVE TO
SAN GABRIEL BL 40 /*25 35 43.7 39.6 36-45 85.1 REDUCE – “HIGH PED & BIKE USERS”, CVC 22358.7(a)(2) *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE, NP = NOT POSTED PAGE 113 of 358
29 STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

KENILWORTH AVENUE
23 LORAIN RD TO
HUNTINGTON DR 25 SB 25 28.0 24.8 21-30 97.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE / POST NB 24 HUNTINGTON DR TO
SIERRA MADRE BLVD NP 25 27.8 24.7 21-30 94.2 POST & ESTABLISH – 85TH PERCENTILE LOMBARDY ROAD 25 WCL (220’ w/o Allen) TO
SIERRA MADRE BLVD 25 EB 25 29.9 25.6 22-31 87.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE / POST WB 26 SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO
SAN GABRIEL BLVD 25 25 29.9 25.9 22-31 83.2
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

LORAIN ROAD
27 SHERWOOD RD TO
VIRGINIA RD 30 25 32.3 29.6 26-35 89.7
REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ] 28 VIRGINIA RD TO
SAN MARINO AVE 30 25 34.4 30.5 27-36 87.1
REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ] 29 SAN MARINO AVE TO
SAN GABRIEL BLVD 30 25 33.3 30.0 26-35 87.3
REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

LOS ROBLES AVENUE
30 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO
MONTEREY RD 30 25 31.7 28.9 25-34 93.8 REDUCE – “SAFETY CORRIDOR”, CVC 22358.7(a)(1) 31 MONTEREY RD TO
HUNTINGTON DR 30 25 32.7 28.6 26-35 91.7 REDUCE – CONSISTENCY MILL LANE 32 ST. ALBANS RD TO VIRGINIA RD 25 WB 25 28.6 24.9 21-30 85.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE – POST EBMISSION STREET 33 WEST CITY LIMIT TO EL MOLINO AVE 25 20 21.8 19.3 16-25 97.3 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE NP = NOT POSTED NB = NORTHBOUND, SB = SOUTHBOUND EB = EASTBOUND, WB = WESTBOUND PAGE 114 of 358
30 STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

MONTEREY ROAD
34 GARFIELD AVE TO ST. ALBANS RD 30 25 34.5 30.3 26-35 88.5 REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ] 35 ST. ALBANS RD TO VIRGINIA RD 35 25 38.6 34.1 29-38 80.6 REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ] 36 VIRGINIA RD TO HUNTINGTON DR 35 30 37.0 34.1 29-38 87.7 REDUCE – PREVENT 10 MPH JUMP IN SPEED OAK GROVE AVENUE 37 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO CIRCLE DR 25 25 26.0 23.3 20-29 95.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 38 CIRCLE DR TO ROSALIND RD NP 25 27.4 23.8 20-29 89.6
POST & ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

OAK KNOLL AVENUE
39 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO HUNTINGTON DRIVE 30 25 34.9 30.4 27-36 81.5 REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

OAKWOOD DRIVE
40 SAN MARINO AVE TO SIERRA MADRE BLVD NP 25 27.0 24.6 20-29 92.7 POST & ESTABLISH – 85TH PERCENTILEORLANDO ROAD 41 CAMERON DR TO CHESTER AVE 30 25 34.9 32.0 28-37 84.8 REDUCE – “HIGH PED & BIKE USERS”, CVC 22358.7(a)(2) OXFORD ROAD 42 ORLANDO RD TO MONTEREY RD 30 25 34.0 30.1 26-35 88.0 REDUCE – “HIGH PED & BIKE USERS”, CVC 22358.7(a)(2) RIDGEWAY ROAD 43 HUNTINGTON DR TO LORAIN RD NP 25 27.0 23.7 21-30 94.3 POST & ESTABLISH – 85TH PERCENTILE *NP = NOT POSTED
PAGE 115 of 358
31 STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

ROBLES AVENUE
44 SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO SANTA ANITA AVE NP 25 28.0 24.2 21-30 78.2 POST & ESTABLISH – 85TH PERCENTILE ROSALIND ROAD 45 VIRGINIA RD TO OAK GROVE AVE (W) NP 25 31.0 27.2 24-33 83.2 POST & ESTABLISH – LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE ROSE AVENUE 46 DEL MAR AVE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD 30 25 35.9 32.1 29-38 86.8 REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

SAINT ALBANS ROAD
47 MILL LANE TO HUNTINGTON DR 25 NB 25 33.8 29.9 27-36 89.2 ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 – POST SB [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ] 48 HUNTINGTON DR TO LORAIN RD 30 25 34.1 31.1 25-34 82.1 REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

SAN MARINO AVE
49 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO EUSTON RD 25 25 31.5 26.2 23-32 68.1 ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ] 50 HUNTINGTON DR TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT 25 25 33.6 27.9 24-33 67.0 ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

SANTA ANITA AVENUE
51 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO ROBLES AVE 30 25 34.8 30.0 25-34 79.7 REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

SHERWOOD ROAD
52 GRANADA AVE TO ST.ALBANS RD 25 25 32.8 28.5 24-33 81.6 ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ] 53 ALHAMBRA RD TO DEL MAR AVE 25 25 29.9 26.3 24-33 88.6 ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ] NP = NOT POSTED NB = NORTH BOUND SB = SOUTHBOUND
PAGE 116 of 358
32 STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD
54 NB - NORTH CITY LIMIT TO EUSTON ROAD 35 35 42.1 39.1 36-45 88.4 NO CHANGE – PREVENT 15 MPH JUMP IN SPEED 55 SB - NORTH CITY LIMIT TO EUSTON ROAD 35 35 41.7 37.8 34-43 84.7 NO CHANGE – PREVENT 15 MPH JUMP IN SPEED SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD / SAN MARINO AVENUE 56 EUSTON RD TO HUNTINGTON DR
35 NB
25 SB 25 34.9 31.0 27-36 82.5
NB – REDUCE, SB – NO CHANGE “HIGH PED & BIKE USERS”, CVC 22358.7(a)(2)

STRATFORD ROAD
57 OXFORD RD TO SAN MARINO AVE NP 25 28.2 25.1 21-30 94.3 POST & ESTABLISH – 85TH PERCENTILE VIRGINIA ROAD 58 OAK GROVE AVE TO ROSALIND RD 25 25 33.0 28.9 25-34 84.7 NO CHANGE – LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE 59 ROSALIND RD TO EUSTON RD 25 25 30.8 27.3 24-33 92.3 NO CHANGE – LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE 60 EUSTON RD TO HUNTINGTON DR 25 25 33.0 29.6 24-33 82.7 ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ] 61 HUNTINGTON DR TO LORAIN RD 25 25 32.9 29.1 25-34 89.7 ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

WEMBLEY ROAD
62 EUSTON RD TO MONTEREY RD NP 25 25.8 23.3 19-28 91.7
POST & ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

WEST DRIVE
63 HUNTINGTON DR TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT 25 25 29.2 25.6 23-32 93.4 ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ] NP = NOT POSTED NB = NORTHBOUND SB = SOUTHBOUND
PAGE 117 of 358
33 STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

WILSON AVENUE
64 EL MOLINO AVE TO GRANADA AVE NP 25 28.5 25.1 20-29 84.3 POST & ESTABLISH – 85TH PERCENTILE WINSTON AVENUE 65 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO HUNTINGTON DR 25 25 33.9 29.5 25-34 81.1 ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 [ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ] NP = NOT POSTED
PAGE 118 of 358

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY

FOR SPEED LIMITS

CITY OF SAN MARINO
OCTOBER 2026
PREPARED FOR:

CITY OF SAN MARINO, CITY HALL
2200 HUNTINGTON DRIVE
SAN MARINO, CALIFORNIA 91108
(626) 300-0700
PREPARED BY:

HARTZOG & CRABILL, INC.

TRAFFIC ENGINEERS
17821 E. 17TH STREET, SUITE 245
TUSTIN, CA 92780
(714) 731-9455
PAGE 119 of 358
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ i Traffic Engineer's Certification ...................................................................................................... ii Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Basic Speed Law ............................................................................................................................. 1 Prima Facie Speed Limits ............................................................................................................... 2 Business District ............................................................................................................................. 2 Residence District ........................................................................................................................... 2 Assembly Bill 43............................................................................................................................. 3 Safety Corridor................................................................................................................................ 3 High Pedestrian & Bike Users ........................................................................................................ 3 Establishment of Speed Zones ........................................................................................................ 3 Data Collection Procedures ............................................................................................................. 3 Speed Zoning Methodology ............................................................................................................ 4 Speed Zone Survey ......................................................................................................................... 4 Local Street Exemptions ................................................................................................................. 5 Other Considerations ...................................................................................................................... 6 Radar Collection Time-Frames ....................................................................................................... 6 Analysis Factors .............................................................................................................................. 6 Field Review ................................................................................................................................... 7 Collision History ............................................................................................................................. 8 Results and Recommendations ....................................................................................................... 8 Safety Corridor Analysis ......................................................................................................... 8 Locations of "Residence District"............................................................................................ 8 Support Explanations for "Residence District" ..................................................................... 10 Locations of "No Speed Limit Changes" ............................................................................... 16 Support Explanations for "No Speed Limit Changes"........................................................... 17 Locations of New Speed Limit Postings ............................................................................... 19 Support Explanations for "New Speed Limit Postings" ........................................................ 20 Locations of "Speed Limit Reductions" ................................................................................ 22 Support Explanations for "Speed Limit Reductions" ............................................................ 23

Summary of Recommendations .....................................................................................................27 Appendix A – Speed Limit Map
Appendix B - For Each Street Segment in the Survey
Data Summary Sheet
Radar Speed Distribution Sheet

Appendix C– Certification
Radar Gun Certification
Technician Certification
PAGE 120 of 358
PAGE 121 of 358
1 CITY OF SAN MARINO

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY FOR SPEED LIMITS
Introduction
In accordance with procedures established by the State of California, this Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) has been developed for the City of San Marino as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City. The work provided herein was authorized by the City and was performed by the engineering consulting firm of Hartzog & Crabill, Inc. The goal of the review was two-fold. The first was to review new roadway segments to determine if speed limit postings should be recommended. The second involved a determination as to whether changes in pre-existing conditions have occurred where older speed limits should be modified.

The requirement to perform E&TS for speed limits is based on the California Vehicle Code (CVC).

CVC Section 40802 states that at least once every five (5), seven (7), or 14 years, States and local agencies should re-evaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways. E&TS must be performed with the use of radar or other approved electronic devices if the use of radar is to be employed to enforce speed limits. If such a survey is not performed within five (5), seven (7) years, or 14 years as stated previously of the date of the preceding survey, then the new data and its use will constitute a "speed trap" (see page 2). Hence, evidence using such would not be admissible in court.

The definition of a E&TS is contained in Section 627 of the CVC and is as follows:

E&TS, as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for use by State and local authorities. An E&TS shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of the following:
(a) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (b) Collision records.
(c) Highway, traffic and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

The CVC has set certain regulations regarding the posting and enforcement of speed zones. These regulations generally reflect the viewpoint that speed zoning should be based on traffic conditions and natural driver behavior and not because of an arbitrary response to a traffic event or occurrence. Therefore, it is important to have a general understanding of the "Basic Speed Law", "Prima Facie Speed Limits" and "Intermediate Speed Zones".

Basic Speed Law (CVC 22350)
All fifty states base their speed regulations on the Basic Speed Law. In California, CVC 22350 defines the basic speed law as:

PAGE 122 of 358
2 "No Person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." This law recognizes that driving conditions vary widely from time-to-time and place-to-place and, therefore, no set of fixed driving rules will adequately serve all conditions. The motorist will constantly adjust their driving behavior to fit the conditions encountered and must learn to do this with a minimum of assistance from the police. The Basic Speed Law is founded on the belief that a majority of motorists are able to modify their driving behavior properly, as long as they are aware of the conditions around them.

Prima Facie Speed Limits (CVC 22352)
All other speed limits are prima facie limits which, "on the face of it", are reasonable and prudent under normal conditions. The opportunity given to the driver to exceed a prima facie speed limit when it is safe to do so recognizes the fact that any posted speed limit cannot adequately reflect the many different conditions of traffic, weather, visibility, etc., that may be found on the same highway at different times.

Certain prima facie limits are automatically established by law (CVC 22352), including a 15 miles per hour (mph) limit in alleys, blind intersections, blind railroad crossing, and the 25 mph limit in business and residence districts. There is also a part time 25 mph limit in school zones when children are present on the route to or from school.

Business and residence districts are defined in the CVC as specific areas meeting a specified minimum density of roadside development. CVC Sections 235 and 515 define these regulations.

A count of houses or active businesses facing on a highway must be made to determine whether or not a valid business or residence district exists. The law does not require posting these prima facie limits that are readily apparent.

Business District (CVC 235)
A "business district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a distance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of business in use for business to the length of the highway exists.

Residence District (CVC 515)
A "residence district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon one side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one-quarter of a mile if the above ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.

PAGE 123 of 358
3 Assembly Bill 43
In accordance with Assembly Bill (AB) 43, it established to two (2) new categories for consideration where it may be appropriate to reduce the speed limit by 5 mph. These were codified as CVC 22358.7 as explained in further detail below. The first category is for a street to be designated as a Safety Corridor, and the second category is for a street to be designated as a street with high concentrations of bicyclists and/or pedestrians.

Safety Corridor (CVC 22358.7(a)(1))
The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) defines a Safety Corridor to be a street where the highest number of fatalities and/or serious injury collisions occurs over a period of three (3) to five (5) years. Safety Corridors are limited to 20 percent of City maintained streets. Therefore, it may be appropriate that certain collisions involving vulnerable populations (i.e., children, seniors and persons with disabilities) are weighted more in order to prioritize which streets get the Safety Corridor designation. Streets designated as Safety Corridors may have the speed limit reduced by 5 mph.

High Pedestrian & Bike Users (CVC 22358.7(a)(2))
Based on the CA MUTCD, streets that have facilities that generate high concentration of pedestrian and bike users may have the speed limit reduced by 5 mph. Examples of these facilities include schools, parks, medical facilities, religious centers and shopping centers. It is important to note that only the portion within 1,320 feet of these types of facilities would qualify for the 5 mph speed reduction. In accordance with the CA MUTCD, an acceptable alternative to high concentration of pedestrian and bike users is to identify the streets within the top 20 percent of fatalities and/or serious injuries collisions involving pedestrians and/or bicyclists over a period of three (3) to five (5) years.

Establishment of Speed Zones
The reason that speed limit areas and their required postings are done is to guard reasonable drivers from the unreasonable behavior of reckless, unreliable, or otherwise dangerous drivers. As with other similar laws, the limits identified are based on the consensus of the majority of those who drive the highway as to what speed is reasonable and safe. It is this type of information that is reflected in the analysis section of this report. Namely, posted speed limits are a reflection of that speed which most people deem to be safe as opposed to a minority of drivers who do not drive in a reasonable manner.

Speed zones are also established to advise of road conditions or hazards that may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For that reason, a field review of related road/traffic variables is conducted which considers the analytical data and collision history of a particular roadway segment to determine a safe and reasonable speed limit.

Data Collection Procedures
Speed evaluation data was collected at 65 different segments on 40 different roadways in the City of San Marino. These areas and the number of segments on each are described as follows:

PAGE 124 of 358
4 1. Alhambra Road (1) 15. Lorain Road (3) 29. St. Alban’s Road (2)

2. Allen Avenue (1) 16. Los Robles Avenue (2) 30. San Marino Avenue (2)

3. California Boulevard (2) 17. Mill Lane (1) 31. Santa Anita Avenue (1)

4. Canterbury Road (2) 18. Mission Street (1) 32. Sherwood Road (2)

5. Chelsea Road (1) 19. Monterey Road (3) 33. Sierra Madre Boulevard (2)

6. Del Mar Avenue (1) 20. Oak Grove Avenue (2)

34. Sierra Madre Boulevard/

7. Duarte Road (1) 21. Oak Knoll Avenue (1) San Marino Avenue (1)

8. El Molino Avenue (2) 22. Oakwood Drive (1) 35. Stratford Road (1)

9. Euston Road (2) 23. Orlando Road (1) 36. Virginia Road (4) 10 Garfield Avenue (1) 24. Oxford Road (1) 37. Wembley Road (1)

11. Granada Avenue (2) 25. Ridgeway Road (1) 38. West Drive (1)

12. Huntington Drive (6) 26. Robles Avenue (1) 39. Wilson Avenue (1)

13. Kenilworth Avenue (2) 27. Rosalind Road (1) 40. Winston Avenue (1)

14. Lombardy Road (2) 28. Rose Avenue (1)
As described in various traffic engineering documents - including information provided by the State of California, the individual locations on which radar data collection procedures used involved considerations for the following:
a. Stop sign or traffic signal locations;
b. Visibility issues;
c. Traffic flow at intersections, cross-traffic, major driveways, crosswalks, railroad crossings and unusual turning movements;
d. The influence of other traffic factors on the speed of cars: such as on street parking, roadway features, adjacent land uses, and lighting.

Speed Zoning Methodology
The CA MUTCD specifies a "short method" of determining speed limits on City and County through Highways, Arterial and Collector Roads Procedures.

Introduction - This short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that the reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorist speeds; one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited to: the most recent two-year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, super-elevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.

Speed Zone Survey
- Only one person is required for the fieldwork. Speeds can be read directly from a radar speed meter.

PAGE 125 of 358
5 - A section of road should be selected with representative operating speeds. If speeds vary on a given road, additional surveys should be conducted. In this case, it may be necessary to establish additional speed zones with different speed limits.
- Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours on weekdays. The weather should be fair with no unusual conditions prevailing. It is important that the surveyor and his equipment be so inconspicuous as not to affect traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, with the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible. It should be placed so as to be able to survey traffic in both directions, and should not make an angle greater than 15 degrees with the roadway center line.

- It is desirable to have a minimum sample of 100 automobiles in each survey. This may result in excessive survey periods for low-volume roads. Under these conditions, the survey should be conducted for a minimum of two hours, but in no case should the sample for any survey contain less than 50 automobiles.
- The CA MUTCD states that speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed can be selected directly from the data sheet. However, roadway conditions not readily apparent to the motorist or other roadway conditions that may impact sight distance may result in a further reduction of 5 mph in the recommended speed limit.
- As a check on the validity of the proposed speed limit, an analysis should be made of the fiveyear collision record for the section of roadway under consideration. If this record shows an abnormally high percentage of collisions normally associated with excessive speeds, the proposed speed limit should be further reduced. This is a judgement situation, and will not usually be a factor.
- Short speed zones of less than half a mile should be avoided, except in transition areas. - Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadway development.
- Speed zoning should be coordinated between adjacent jurisdictions.

Local Street Exemptions (CVC 40802)
Many streets are designated as "Local" streets per CVC 40802. These streets are exempt from the radar study. Therefore, the speed limit for these streets does not require an E&TS. The code is as follows:
"For the purpose of this section, local streets and roads shall be defined by the latest functional usage and federal aid system maps as submitted to the Federal Highway Administration. When these maps have not been submitted, the following definition shall be used: A local street or road primarily provides access to abutting residential property and shall meet the following three conditions:

PAGE 126 of 358
6 1. Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.

2. Not more than one half mile of uninterrupted length.

3. Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.

Other Considerations
Every street should be inspected for unusual traffic, roadway and roadside conditions not readily apparent to a motorist. A check should be made of the adequacy of traffic control devices, roadway alignment, width surface conditions, collision history and any unique traffic hazards that may exist. Any of these conditions may warrant the selection of a speed lower than the 85th percentile speed for speed zoning.

Radar Collection Time-Frames
The hours of radar operation were restricted to off-peak periods (when possible) for heavily traveled streets and to uncongested peak periods on lightly traveled streets. All surveys were conducted in fair weather.

The radar unit was mounted at the top of the front dash of an unmarked vehicle with the meterreading unit sustained inside the vehicle. The radar unit's calibration was checked periodically using a tuning fork.

The radar operator and assistant recorded the speed meter readings for each location on Radar Speed Survey Field Sheets included in the appendix of this report. A representative sampling of at least 100 vehicles were surveyed.

Analysis Factors
Several factors were used as input to our recommendations for speed limits. These include the 85th Percentile, the 10 MPH Pace and others. These are described in detail below.

1. The CRITICAL SPEED, or the 85th percentile, is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. From experience, traffic engineers have found that this is one of the most reliable factors in determining appropriate speed limits.

Hence, the accepted practice, and one that has been used in this case is to set the speed limit at or near the critical speed. This recognizes that other factors could be present where the above may not be appropriate. When this procedure is used, it not only conforms to that required by the State but it also provides a strong base for law enforcement personnel to properly enforce speed limits.

2. The 10 MPH PACE is that continuous 10 mph incremental range of speeds in which the largest number of recorded vehicles is contained. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds within the sample surveyed. For this element, the accepted practice to the greatest extent possible is to try and keep the recommended speed limit within the 10 mph pace after considering the critical speed and any factors requiring a speed lower than the critical speed.

3. The MEDIAN (MIDDLE) SPEED, or 50th percentile speed, represents the mid-point value within the range of recorded speeds for a particular roadway location. In other words, 50% of PAGE 127 of 358
7 the vehicles travel faster than the median speeds and 50% travel slower than the median speeds. This value is another measure of the central tendency of the vehicle speed distribution.

4. The 15th PERCENTILE SPEED is that speed at or below which 15% of the vehicles are traveling. This value is important in determining the minimum allowable speed limit, given that the vehicles traveling below this speed tend to obstruct the flow of traffic, thereby increasing the collision potential.

5. MODAL SPEED: The modal speed is the speed, which occurs most frequently in the distribution (the most). It serves as another useful measure in verifying the correct recommendation for speed limits.

6. STANDARD DEVIATION: This is a mathematical element, which relates to measures of dispersion of data. It is used to assist in describing the center of speed distribution information around the arithmetic mean or the time mean speed. It also is used in the overall review of recommended speed limits and serves to verify the level of confidence of data used in making recommendations.

7. The MEAN (AVERAGE) is the sum of the speeds of the samples divided by the number of samples.

The numerical values of the above factors are derived from the speed distribution curves calculated for each survey location. These distribution curves represent a method of graphic analysis that compares the cumulative percentage of vehicles to the speed at which the vehicles are traveling.

Field Review
In addition to the availability of the above statistical data, a significant aspect of speed limit recommendations is based on the field review. Its importance is that existing conditions may warrant a lower speed than is actually indicated by the application of survey data. Examples of the field data collected for the purposes of analyzing related roadway characteristics as they pertain to the determination of appropriate speed limits are listed as follows:

1. Segment length, width and alignment

2. Level of pedestrian activity

3. Traffic flow characteristics

4. Vertical and/or horizontal curves.

5. Driver sight distance constraints.

6. Adjacent residential/commercial/industrial etc. zoning.

7. Number of lanes and other channelization/striping factors

8. Frequency of intersections, driveways and on street parking;

9. Location of stop signs, traffic signals, and other regulatory traffic control devices;

10. Roadway conditions, bumps and dips;

11. Obstructions to pedestrian visibility;

12. Land use and proximity of schools;

13. Uniformity and continuity with existing speed zones to/with adjacent jurisdictions;

14. Any other unusual conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

PAGE 128 of 358
8 The results of the field review of related road/traffic variables are summarized on the E&TS forms found in the Appendix of this report.

Collision History
The E&TS forms summarize the available five-year collision information for the subject streets.

The collision information includes the total number of collisions within each street segment and of those collisions, the number that are speed-related, involved fatalities, serious injuries, pedestrians and bicyclists. This information was obtained from the California Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) for the City of San Marino. To provide an equitable comparison between street segments the collision data was converted to collisions per million vehicle miles Results and Recommendations
The following Summaries: Safety Corridor analysis, Residence District, No Speed Limit Changes, New Speed Limit Postings, Speed Limit Reductions and Summary of Recommendations, present the results of the radar survey for the selected 65 locations. As shown, the Summary of Recommendations chart presents the necessary analysis elements that in addition to the field review of a registered Traffic Engineer led to the recommendations indicated.

Safety Corridor Analysis
In accordance with the CVC and CA MUTCD, the Safety Corridor designation is limited to 20 percent of City maintained streets. In the City of San Marino, there are approximately 59.75 miles of City maintained streets. These do not include private streets that are maintained by the various Homeowner Associations (HOAs). A maximum of 11.95 miles of City streets can be designated as a Safety Corridor.

Based on an analysis of all 65 street segments, collision history and street prioritization, the following 3 segments in the Table below are recommended to be designated as Safety Corridors.

Collectively, the Safety Corridors have a total of 2.16 miles.

NO. STREET LOCATION MILES
14 Garfield Avenue Huntington Drive to Monterey Road 0.47 17 Huntington Drive Garfield Avenue to Virginia Road 1.26 30 Los Robles Avenue North City Limit to Monterey Road 0.44 TOTAL 2.16
Locations of “Residence District”
There are 30 roadway segments in the E&TS that fall under the CVC Section 515, “Residence District” speed limit of 25 mph. Explanations and requirements for Residence District are on Page

2. The CVC states that prima facie roadways are not required to be posted. Therefore, the City may choose to [1] remove the existing 25 mph speed signs or leave them installed, [2] post/install new speed signs for those segments with no speed limit postings, or [3] reduce the existing speed limit for the segments with speed limits higher than 25 mph. For segments that qualify as a Residence District, they do not require a continued speed survey. These roadway segments are listed below:

PAGE 129 of 358
9 Canterbury Road
California Blvd to Sierra Madre Blvd Establish as Residence District – Post 25 mph Sierra Madre Blvd to San Gabriel Blvd Establish as Residence District – Retain 25 mph Chelsea Road
Huntington Dr to Sherwood Rd Establish as Residence District – Post 25 mph Duarte Road
Lorain Rd to San Gabriel Blvd Establish as Residence District – Retain 25 mph El Molino Avenue
North City Limit to Monterey Rd Establish as Residence District – Retain 25 mph Monterey Rd to South City Limit Establish as Residence District – Retain 25 mph Euston Road
Virginia Rd to Wembley Rd Establish as Residence District – Retain 25 mph Granada Avenue
Wilson Ave to Huntington Dr Establish as Residence District – Retain 25 mph Huntington Dr to Alhambra Rd Establish as Residence District – Reduce to 25 mph Lombardy Road
Sierra Madre Blvd to San Gabriel Blvd Establish as Residence District – Retain 25 mph Lorain Road
Sherwood Rd to Virginia Rd Establish as Residence District – Reduce to 25 mph Virginia Rd to San Marino Ave Establish as Residence District – Reduce to 25 mph San Marino Ave to San Gabriel Blvd Establish as Residence District – Reduce to 25 mph Monterey Road
Garfield Ave to St. Albans Rd Establish as Residence District – Reduce to 25 mph St. Albans Rd to Virginia Rd Establish as Residence District – Reduce to 25 mph Oak Grove Avenue
Circle Dr to Rosalind Rd Establish as Residence District – Post 25 mph Oak Knoll Avenue
North City Limit to Huntington Dr Establish as Residence District – Reduce to 25 mph Rose Avenue
Del Mar Ave to San Gabriel Blvd Establish as Residence District – Reduce to 25 mph St. Albans Road
Mill Ln to Huntington Dr Establish as Residence District – Retain 25 mph Huntington Dr to Lorain Rd Establish as Residence District – Reduce to 25 mph San Marino Avenue
North City Limit to Euston Rd Establish as Residence District – Retain 25 mph Huntington Dr to South City Limit Establish as Residence District – Retain 25 mph PAGE 130 of 358
10 Santa Anita Avenue
North City Limit to Robles Ave Establish as Residence District – Reduce to 25 mph Sherwood Road
Granada Ave to St. Albans Rd Establish as Residence District – Retain 25 mph Alhambra Rd to Del Mar Ave Establish as Residence District – Retain 25 mph Virginia Road
Euston Rd to Huntington Dr Establish as Residence District – Retain 25 mph Huntington Dr to Lorain Rd Establish as Residence District – Retain 25 mph Wembley Road
Euston Rd to Monterey Rd Establish as Residence District – Post 25 mph West Drive
Huntington Dr to South City Limit Establish as Residence District – Retain 25 mph Winston Avenue
North City Limit to Huntington Dr Establish as Residence District – Retain 25 mph Support Explanations for “Residence District”
Canterbury Road
5 – California Boulevard to Sierra Madre Boulevard
This segment of Canterbury Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 29 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.39 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 25 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit.
6 – Sierra Madre Boulevard to San Gabriel Boulevard
This segment of Canterbury Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 42 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.48 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 30.7 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit.

Chelsea Road
7 – Huntington Drive to Sherwood Road
This segment of Chelsea Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. This segment has 16 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.23 miles, which meets the minimum of 16 dwelling houses or business structures per PAGE 131 of 358
11 CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit.

Duarte Road
9 – Lorain Road to San Gabriel Boulevard
This segment of Duarte Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. This segment has 21 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.24 miles, which exceeds the minimum of 16 dwelling houses or business structures per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit.

El Molino Avenue
10 – North City Limit to Monterey Road
This segment of El Molino Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 25 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.34 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 21.8 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit.
11 – Monterey Road to South City Limit
This segment of El Molino Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 27 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.40 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 25.6 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit.

Euston Road
12 – Virginia Road to Wembley Road
This segment of Euston Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 24 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.33 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 21.1 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit.

Granada Avenue
15 – Wilson Avenue to Huntington Drive
This segment of Granada Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. This segment has 16 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.15miles, which meets the minimum of 16 dwelling houses or business structures per PAGE 132 of 358
12 CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit.
16 – Huntington Drive to Alhambra Road
This segment of Granada Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 40 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.54 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 34.6 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph.

Lombardy Road
26 – Sierra Madre Boulevard to San Gabriel Boulevard
This segment of Lombardy Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 36 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.43 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 27.5 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit.

Lorain Road
27 – Sherwood Road to Virginia Road
This segment of Lorain Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 65 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.54 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 34.6 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph. 28 – Virginia Road to San Marino Avenue
This segment of Lorain Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 81 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.59 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 37.8 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph. 29 – San Marino Avenue to San Gabriel Boulevard
This segment of Lorain Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 105 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.92 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 58.9 dwelling houses to street length per PAGE 133 of 358
13 CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph.

Monterey Road
34 – Garfield Avenue to St. Albans Road
This segment of Monterey Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 91 dwelling houses fronting the street over 1.01 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 64.6 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph. 35 –St. Albans Road to Virginia Road
This segment of Monterey Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 18 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.27 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 17.3 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph.

Oak Grove Avenue
38 – Circle Drive to Rosalind Road
This segment of Oak Grove Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 44 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.68 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 43.5 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit. It is also recommended that 25 mph speed limit signs be posted in both directions for this segment.

Oak Knoll Avenue
39 – North City Limit to Huntington Drive
This segment of Oak Knoll Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 30 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.42 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 26.9 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph.

Rose Avenue
46 – Del Mar Avenue to San Gabriel Boulevard
This segment of Rose Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or PAGE 134 of 358
14 more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 54 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.75 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 48 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph.

St. Albans Road
47 – Mill Lane to Huntington Drive
This segment of St. Albans Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 36 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.44 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 28.2 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit. It is recommended that a 25 mph speed sign be installed for the southbound direction. 48 – Huntington Drive to Lorain Road
This segment of St. Albans Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 28 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.32 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 20.5 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduce to 25 mph.

San Marino Avenue
49 – North City Limit to Euston Road
This segment of San Marino Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 63 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.86 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 55 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit.
50 – Huntington Drive to South City Limit
This segment of San Marino Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 37 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.57 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 36.5 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit.

Santa Anita Avenue
51 – North City Limit to Robles Avenue
This segment of Santa Anita Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by PAGE 135 of 358
15 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 45 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.53 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 33.9 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph.

Sherwood Road
52 – Granada Avenue to St. Albans Road
This segment of Sherwood Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 43 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.45 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 28.8 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit.
53 – Alhambra Road to Del Mar Avenue
This segment of Sherwood Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 93 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.89 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 57 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit.

Virginia Road
60 – Euston Road to Huntington Drive
This segment of Virginia Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 19 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.25 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 16 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit.
61 – Huntington Drive to Lorain Road
This segment of Virginia Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 18 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.27 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 17.3 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit.

Wembley Road
62 – Euston Road to Monterey Road
This segment of Wembley Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or PAGE 136 of 358
16 more separate dwelling houses or business structures. This segment has 16 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.17 miles, which meets the minimum of 16 dwelling houses or business structures per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit. Currently, this section does not have speed signs posted. Therefore, it is recommended that 25 mph speed signs be installed in both directions.

West Drive
63 – Huntington Drive to South City Limit
This segment of West Drive meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 35 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.39 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 25 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit.

Winston Avenue
65 – North City Limit to Huntington Drive
This segment of Winston Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 99 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.89 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 57 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 mph speed limit.

Locations of “No Speed Limit Changes”
The Summary indicates that 15 of the 65 segments studied are recommended for no speed limit changes. The reason centers mostly on the fact that the newly measured values of the 85th percentile and the 10 MPH pace are still within the parameters of the existing speed limits. Additional factors such as reduced sight distance, higher than expected collision rates, high pedestrian and bicyclist traffic, areas that are considered as a safety corridor, and keeping continuity with the speeds of neighboring segments form the basis in some instances of our recommendation. Therefore, the current postings should remain as is. At five (5) of these locations, only one direction of travel is posted and is listed for no change in the speed limit. Hence, the other direction should be posted for consistency. These segments noted as “install”, as well as the segments recommended for “No Change” are listed below:

Alhambra Road
Sherwood Rd to Lorain Rd Remain posted at 25 mph, Install SB Allen Avenue
North City Limit to Orlando Rd Remain posted at 30 mph, Install NB

California Boulevard
West City Limit to Sierra Madre Blvd Remain posted at 35 mph Sierra Madre Blvd to San Gabriel Blvd Remain posted at 35 mph PAGE 137 of 358
17 Del Mar Avenue
Huntington Dr to South City Limit Remain posted at 30 mph Euston Road
Wembley Rd to San Marino Ave Remain posted at 25 mph
Kenilworth Avenue
Lorain Rd to Huntington Dr Remain posted at 25 mph, Install NB Lombardy Road
West City Limit to Sierra Madre Blvd Remain posted at 25 mph, Install WB

Mill Lane
St. Albans Rd to Virginia Rd Remain posted at 25 mph. Install EB Oak Grove Avenue
North City Limit to Circle Dr Remain posted at 25 mph
Sierra Madre Boulevard
NB – North City Limit to Euston Rd Remain posted at 35 mph SB – North City Limit to Euston Rd Remain posted at 35 mph Sierra Madre Boulevard/San Marino Avenue
Euston Rd to Huntington Dr Remain posted at 25 mph
Virginia Road
Oak Grove Ave to Rosalind Rd Remain posted at 25 mph
Rosalind Rd to Euston Rd Remain posted at 25 mph
Support Explanations of “No Speed Limit Changes”
The following support explanations are for the roadway segments recommended to maintain the existing posted speed limits and that are 5 mph or more lower than the newly measured 85th percentile speed and the segments with a posted speed limit in one direction only that are recommended to post in the other direction.

Alhambra Road
1 – Sherwood Road to Lorain Road
The recommended 25 mph is 1.4 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed of 26.4 mph and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended to post a 25 mph speed limit sign for the southbound direction.

Allen Avenue
2 – North City Limit to Orlando Road
The recommended 30 mph is 2.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended that a 30 mph speed sign be install for the northbound direction.

PAGE 138 of 358
18 Del Mar Avenue
8 – Huntington Drive to South City Limit
This section of Del Mar Avenue is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (fronting), a baseball field, church and commercial/business activity at Huntington Drive. The speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of 39.0 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 29 to 38 mph which may suggest a 35 mph speed limit. To prevent a 10 mph jump in speed limit from the northerly adjacent segment of Winston Avenue with a 25 mph speed limit, it is recommended to retain the existing speed limit of 30 mph
Euston Road
12 – Wembley Road to San Marino Avenue
This portion of Euston Road is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land uses on the south-side of road is residential with direct driveways, and the entire north-side is The Huntington's with a gallery, library, museum, lily pond and more. During events at The Huntington's facilities this area is used for over flow on-street parking, pedestrian traffic can be very heavy in this area and with no sidewalks on the Northside of the street pedestrians and bicyclists use the main roadway. The roadway has slight up-downhill grades, several "T" intersections (south-side), a moderate "C" curve at Wembley Road, and areas of red curb near the Huntington's. The speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of 33.9 mph which may suggest a 30 mph speed limit. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.

For the majority of the segment, there is The Huntington's, and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the speed limit be maintained at 25 mph.

Kenilworth Avenue
23 – Lorain Road to Huntington Drive
The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 3.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed of

28.0 mph and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed sign is posted for the northbound direction.

Lombardy Road
25 – West City Limit to Sierra Madre Boulevard
The recommended 25 mph is 4.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed mph and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed sign be posted for the northbound direction.

Mill Lane
32 – St. Albans Road to Virginia Road
The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 3.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed of 28.6 mph and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed sign be posted for the eastbound direction.

Sierra Madre Boulevard
54 – NB – North City Limit to Euston Road
This northbound section of Sierra Madre Boulevard has two lanes of travel and is 100% residential.

The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Although, the speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed

42.1 mph and a 10 mph pace of 36 to 45 mph, to prevent a 15 mph jump in speed from the adjacent PAGE 139 of 358
19 southern segment with a 25 mph speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 35 speed limit be maintained.
55 – SB – North City Limit to Euston Road
This southbound section of Sierra Madre Boulevard has two lanes of travel. The adjacent land use is 100% residential fronting and non-fronting to the roadway. The posted speed limit is 35 mph.

Although, the speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed 41.7 mph, to prevent a 15 mph jump in speed from the adjacent southern segment with a 25 mph speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 35 mph speed limit be maintained.

Sierra Madre Boulevard/San Marino Avenue
56 – Euston Road to Huntington Drive
This segment of Sierra Madre Boulevard and San Marino Avenue merges together. Just after Euston Road the two southbound lanes of Sierra Madre Boulevard merge into the southbound lane of San Marino Avenue. The posted speed limit northbound is 35 mph and southbound is 25 mph. The adjacent land uses are residential, commercial / business at Huntington Drive. Field observations include wide median divider, no shoulders, large area of red curb near Huntington Drive, and a moderate "C" curve. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 34.9 mph which may suggest a 30 mph speed limit. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of the segment, there are many restaurants and shops and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 25 mph speed limit be maintained for the southbound direction; and to replace the existing 35 mph speed limit sign with a 25 mph speed limit sign in the northbound direction.

Virginia Road
58 – Oak Grove Avenue to Rosalind Drive
This portion of Virginia Road has one lane per direction with a posted 25 mph speed limit. The roadway has a gradual to moderate "C" curve south of Oak Grove Avenue and a sweeping "C" curve near Rosalinda Drive. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 33.0 mph and median speed of 28.9 mph. Although, the 85th percentile which may suggest a 30 mph speed limit, with the many moderate to sweeping horizontal curves, and limited sight distance at the roadway curves, it is recommended to maintain the existing speed limit of 25 mph. 59 – Rosalind Drive to Euston Road
This portion of Virginia Road has one lane per direction with a posted 25 mph speed limit. The roadway has continuous gradual to moderate "S" curves and a sweeping "C" curve between Mill Lane and Euston Road. The sight distance at the driveway n/o Mill Lane is 164 ft. and a driveway s/o Rosalind Road is 135 ft. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 30.9 mph and median speed of 27.6 mph. With the roadway vertical & horizontal curves, and the many areas of limited sight distance, it is recommended to maintain the existing speed limit of 25 mph.

Locations of “New Speed Limit Postings”
Eleven (11) locations are currently un-posted within the segment length. It is noted that for those cases, the recommendation to post is necessary to enhance the enforcement of the recommended speed limit. Based on the speed data the segments listed below are recommended to post/install PAGE 140 of 358
20 such speed limit signs for both directions and is identified in the Summary of Recommendations.

Three (3) of the segments below are also recommended to be established as a “Residence District”.

Chelsea Road
Huntington Dr to Sherwood Rd Post 25 mph – See Residence District Page 10 Huntington Drive
WB - Virginia Rd to San Marino Ave Post a 35 mph Speed Limit Kenilworth Avenue
Huntington Dr to Sierra Madre Blvd Post a 25 mph Speed Limit Oak Grove Avenue
Circle Dr to Rosalind Rd Post 25 mph – See Residence District Page 13 Oakwood Drive
San Marino Ave to Sierra Madre Blvd Post a 25 mph Speed Limit Ridgeway Road
Huntington Dr to Lorain Rd Post a 25 mph Speed Limit
Robles Avenue
Sierra Madre Blvd to Santa Anita Ave Post a 25 mph Speed Limit Rosalind Road
Virginia Rd to Oak Grove Ave (W) Post at 25 mph Speed limit Stratford Road
Oxford Rd to San Marino Ave Post a 25 mph Speed Limit
Wembley Road
Euston Rd to Monterey Rd Post 25 mph – See Residence District Page 15 Wilson Avenue
El Molino Ave to Granada Ave Post a 25 mph Speed Limit
Support Explanations of “New Speed Limit Postings”
Huntington Drive
21 – Virginia Road to San Marino Avenue
This westbound section of Huntington Drive has 3 and 4 lanes of travel. The adjacent land uses are residential non-fronting, heavy business, commercial dwellings with shops and restaurants, San Marino High School, and St. Felicitas Catholic School. Other field observations are the section from Winston Ave to Ridgeway Road there are angled parking (2 hr.), heavy pedestrian traffic at the business activity area. Also there are areas of red curb and green curb, and heavy pedestrian and bike traffic near the schools. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of

43.7 mph which may suggest a 40 mph speed limit. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and PAGE 141 of 358
21 bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of the segment, there are many restaurants and shops, high school, catholic school and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the City install 35 mph speed signs for the westbound direction.

Kenilworth Avenue
24 – Huntington Drive to Sierra Madre Boulevard
Kenilworth Avenue is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are mainly residential with some commercial facing Huntington Drive. This section does not have a speed limit signs posted within the segment. The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 2.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. It is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be established and speed signs be installed for this roadway.

Oakwood Drive
40 – San Marino Avenue to Sierra Madre Boulevard
This section of Oakwood Drive is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land use is solely residential front the roadway. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 27.0 mph and a 10 mph pace of 20 to 29 mph. With that, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be posted and established for this segment.

Ridgeway Road
43 – Huntington Drive to Lorain Road
This portion of Ridgeway Road is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential an commercial-business. This segment does not have a posted speed limit. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 27.0, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be posted and established for this area.

Robles Avenue
44 – Sierra Madre Boulevard to Santa Anita Avenue
This portion of Robles Avenue is a two lane roadway. Adjacent land uses include residential and the rear side of San Marino High School. This section does not have speed limit signs posted within the segment. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 28.0 mph and a median speed of 24.2 mph. With that, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be established and speed signs be installed in both directions for this segment.

Rosalind Road
45 – Virginia Road to Oak Grove Avenue (W)
This portion of Rosalind Road is a two lane roadway. The roadway has continuous slight to gradual vertical and horizontal curves and no speed limit signs posted within the segment. The adjacent land use is solely residential. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of

31.0 mph and a median speed of 27.2 mph. With the nature of the area and the areas of limited sight distance at the roadway curves, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be established and speed signs to be installed for this segment.

PAGE 142 of 358
22 Stratford Road
57 – Oxford Road to San Marino Avenue
This portion of Stratford Road is a short 0.10 mile roadway with one lane per direction. The adjacent land use is solely residential. Currently, this segment does not have a posted speed limit.

With the speed study results showing an 85th percentile speed of 28.2 mph, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be established and posted for this area.

Wilson Avenue
64 – El Molino Avenue to Granada Avenue
This section of Wilson Avenue is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land use is solely residential fronting the roadway. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 28.5 mph and a 10 mph pace of 20 to 29 mph. With that, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be posted and established for this segment.

Locations of “Speed Limit Reductions”
At 23 locations, the E&TS data indicates a need for a speed limit reduction. The newly measured values of the 85th percentile speeds, the 10 mph pace range, roadway characteristics such as horizontal/vertical curves, limited sight distance, and to keep consistency with speeds of adjacent segments, or high collision rates were factors used to make these recommendations. Ten (10) segments listed below are also recommended to be established as a “Residence District”.

Garfield Avenue
Monterey Rd to Huntington Dr Reduce 35 mph to 30 mph
Granada Avenue
Huntington Dr to Alhambra Rd Reduce – See Residence District Page 12 Huntington Drive
EB - Garfield Ave to Virginia Rd Reduce 40 mph to 35 mph EB - Virginia Rd to San Marino Ave Reduce 40 mph to 35 mph EB - San Marino Blvd to San Gabriel Blvd Reduce 40 mph to 35 mph WB - Garfield Ave to Virginia Rd Reduce 40 mph to 35 mph WB - San Marino Blvd to San Gabriel Blvd Reduce 40 mph to 35 mph

Lorain Road
Sherwood Rd to Virginia Rd Reduce – See Residence District Page 12 Virginia Rd to San Marino Ave Reduce – See Residence District Page 12 San Marino Ave to San Gabriel Blvd Reduce – See Residence District Page 12

Los Robles Avenue
North City Limit to Monterey Rd Reduce 30 mph to 25 mph Monterey Rd to Huntington Dr Reduce 30 mph to 25 mph
Mission Street
West City Limit to El Molino Ave Reduce 25 mph to 20 mph PAGE 143 of 358
23 Monterey Road
Garfield Ave to St. Albans Rd Reduce – See Residence District Page 13 St. Albans Rd to Virginia Rd Reduce – See Residence District Page 13 Virginia Rd to Huntington Dr Reduce 35 mph to 30 mph
Oak Knoll Avenue
North City Limit to Huntington Dr Reduce – See Residence District Page 13 Orlando Road
Cameron Dr to Chester Ave Reduce 30 mph to 25 mph
Oxford Road
Orlando Rd to Monterey Rd Reduce 30 mph to 25 mph
Rose Avenue
Del Mar Ave to San Gabriel Blvd Reduce – See Residence District Page 13 St. Albans Road
Huntington Dr to Lorain Rd Reduce – See Residence District Page 14 Santa Anita Avenue
North City Limit to Robles Ave Reduce – See Residence District Page 14 Sierra Madre Boulevard/San Marino Avenue
Euston Rd to Huntington Dr Reduce 35 mph to 30 mph
Support Explanations for “Speed Limit Reductions”
Garfield Avenue
14 – Monterey Road to Huntington Drive
This section of Garfield Avenue is two lane roadway. The adjacent land use is residential, church and YMCA. The speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of 38.3 mph which may suggest a 35 mph speed limit. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had 3 collisions that were speed related, and 1 collision involved serious injuries, and 1 collision involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7 (a)(1), this segment is designated as a "Safety Corridor" which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designate as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20 percent of City maintained streets.

Therefore, it is recommended to reduce the existing 35 mph speed limit to 30 mph.

Huntington Drive
17 – EB – Garfield Avenue to Virginia Road
This section of Huntington Drive is three lanes roadway eastbound. The adjacent land use is residential, business and commercial. The speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of

43.9 mph which may suggest a 40 mph speed limit. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had 2 collisions that were speed related, and 1 collision involved serious injuries, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7 (a)(1), this segment is designated as a "Safety PAGE 144 of 358
24 Corridor" which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designate as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20 percent of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended to reduce the existing 40 mph speed limit to 35 mph.
18 – EB – Virginia Road to San Marino Avenue
This section of Huntington Drive has three lanes of travel for the eastbound. The adjacent land uses include some residential, commercial business with angled parking, Valentine Elementary school, Huntington Middle School, Library and community center. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 42.5 mph which may suggest a 40 mph speed limit. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.

For the entire stretch of the segment, there are two schools, a library, community center, business activity area and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph. 19 – EB - San Marino Avenue to San Gabriel Boulevard
This section of Huntington Drive has three lanes of travel for the eastbound. The adjacent land uses are residential non-fronting, heavy business/commercial activity with many shops and restaurants, fire department, church, and post office. Field observations include angled parking and heavy pedestrian traffic at business area, 2 hour parking 9am to 5pm, and areas of red curb and green curb. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 41.8 mph which may suggest a 40 mph speed limit. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of the segment, there are many restaurants and shops, and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to at 35 mph. 20 – WB – Garfield Avenue to Virginia Road
This westbound portion of Huntington Drive has three lanes. The adjacent land use is residential, schools at Virginia Road and Granada Avenue, and commercial/business activity areas. Other field observations includes the roadway has many cross streets and crosswalks, wide median with roads and signals, bus stops and areas of red curb. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 43.8 mph which may suggest a 40 mph speed limit. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of the segment, there are many restaurants and shops, schools and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to at 35 mph.
22 – San Marino Avenue to San Gabriel Boulevard
This section of Huntington Drive has 3 and 4 lanes of travel for the westbound direction. The adjacent land uses are residential non-fronting, heavy business, commercial dwellings with shops and restaurants, San Marino High School, and St Felicitas Catholic School. Field observations are the section from Winston Ave to Ridgeway Road there are angled parking (2 hr.), heavy pedestrian traffic at the business activity area. Also there are areas of red curb and green curb, and heavy pedestrian and bike traffic near the schools. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 43.7 mph which may suggest a 40 mph speed limit. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and bike PAGE 145 of 358
25 users, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of the segment, there are many restaurants and shops, high school, catholic school and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to at 35 mph.

Los Robles Avenue
30 – North City Limit to Monterey Road
This section of Los Robles Avenue is two lane arterial roadway. The adjacent land use is solely residential. The speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of 31.7 mph which may suggest a 30 mph speed limit. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had 6 collisions that were speed related, and 1 collision involved serious injuries, and 2 collision involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7 (a)(1), this segment is designated as a "Safety Corridor" which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designate as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20 percent of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended to reduce the existing 30 mph speed limit to 25 mph. 31 – Monterey Road to Huntington Drive
This portion of Los Robles Avenue has one lane of travel per direction. The adjacent land uses are mainly residential and commercial at Huntington Drive. The E & T Study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 32.7 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 26 to 35 mph. In an effort to keep consistency with speed of the adjacent northerly segment, it is recommended that the existing 30 mph be reduced to 25 mph.

Mission Street
33 – West City Limit to El Molino Avenue
This section of Mission Street is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land use is a business area with restaurants, hair salon, and small stores/shops. Field observations include the areas has a downtown feel with dense small business dwellings, heavy pedestrian traffic, and many on-street and angled parking. With the speed survey resulting with an 85th percentile speed of 21.8 mph, it is recommended that the existing 25 mph be reduce to 20 mph speed limit.

Monterey Road
36 – Virginia Avenue to Huntington Drive
This portion of Monterey Road is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential and commercial/business activity at Huntington Drive. The speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of 37.0 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 29 to 38 mph, which may suggest a 35 mph speed limit. To prevent a 10 mph jump in speed limit from the westerly adjacent segment with a 25 mph speed limit, it is recommended the existing 35 mph be reduced to 30 mph.

Orlando Road
41 – Cameron Drive to Chester Avenue
This portion of Orlando Road is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land uses include residential with direct driveways on the north-side of road, and the majority of the south-side is The Huntington's with a gallery, library, museum, lily pond and more. During events at The Huntington's facilities this area is used for over flow on-street parking, pedestrian traffic can be very heavy, and with no sidewalk on the south-side of the street pedestrians and bicyclists use the main roadway. The PAGE 146 of 358
26 roadway has slight to gradual horizontal/vertical curves, and areas of limited sight distance. The speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of 34.9 mph which may suggest a 30 mph speed limit. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the majority of the segment, there is The Huntington's, and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph.

Oxford Road
42 – Orlando Road to Monterey Road
This portion of Oxford Road is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land uses include 100% residential with direct driveways on the east-side of road, and the majority of the west-side is The Huntington's with a gallery, library, museum, lily pond and more. During events at The Huntington's facilities this area is used for over flow on-street parking, pedestrian traffic can be very heavy, and with no sidewalk on the west-side of the street pedestrians and bicyclists use the main roadway. The speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of 34.0 mph which may suggest a 30 mph speed limit.

However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and bike users”, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.

For the majority of the segment, there is The Huntington's, and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph.

PAGE 147 of 358
27 C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 2026

STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT
OF

VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

ALHAMBRA ROAD
1 SHERWOOD RD TO
VIRGINIA RD 25 NB 25 26.4 23.7 21-30 94.7 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE / POST SB

ALLEN AVENUE
2 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO
ORLANDO RD 30 SB 30 32.9 29.4 25-34 83.6 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE / POST NB

CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD
3 WEST CITY LIMIT TO
SIERRA MADRE BLVD 35 35 39.6 35.8 32-41 88.9 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 4 SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO
SAN GABRIEL BLVD 35 35 37.6 34.7 30-39 94.7 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE

CANTERBURY ROAD
5 CALIFORNIA BLVD TO
SIERRA MADRE BLVD NP 25 33.0 29.2 25-34 87.2
POST & ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]
6 SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO
SAN GABRIEL BLVD 25 25 26.7 24.1 21-30 93.5
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

CHELSEA ROAD
7 HUNTINGTON DR TO
SHERWOOD RD NP 25 29.9 27.1 23-32 95.4
POST & ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

DEL MAR AVENUE
8 HUNTINGTON DR TO
SOUTH CITY LIMIT 30 /*25 30 39.0 34.1 29-38 76.8 NO CHANGE – PREVENT 10 MPH JUMP IN SPEED

DUARTE ROAD
9 LORAIN RD TO
SAN GABRIEL BLVD 25 25 30.9 27.2 23-32 94.1
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]
*25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE
NP = NOT POSTED, SB = SOUTHBOUND, NB = NORTHBOUND
PAGE 148 of 358
28 STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

EL MOLINO AVENUE
10 NCL (80’ s/o Old Mill) TO
MONTEREY RD 25 25 31.1 27.8 24-33 89.9
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]
11 MONTEREY RD TO
SCL (Huntington Dr) 25 25 34.1 30.4 25-34 81.4
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

GARFIELD AVENUE
14 MONTEREY RD TO
HUNTINGTON DR 35 30 38.3 34.9 31-40 90.6 REDUCE – "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1)

GRANADA AVENUE
15 WILSON AVE TO
HUNTINGTON DR 25 25 34.5 30.9 26-35 86.2
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]
16 HUNTINGTON DR TO
ALHAMBRA RD 30 25 32.5 29.5 25-34 90.8
REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

LOMBARDY ROAD
25 WCL (220’ w/o Allen) TO
SIERRA MADRE BLVD 25 EB 25 29.9 25.6 22-31 87.1 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE / POST WB 26 SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO
SAN GABRIEL BLVD 25 25 29.9 25.9 22-31 83.2
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

LORAIN ROAD
27 SHERWOOD RD TO
VIRGINIA RD 30 25 32.3 29.6 26-35 89.7
REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]
28 VIRGINIA RD TO
SAN MARINO AVE 30 25 34.4 30.5 27-36 87.1
REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]
29 SAN MARINO AVE TO
SAN GABRIEL BLVD 30 25 33.3 30.0 26-35 87.3
REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

MILL LANE
32 ST. ALBANS RD TO
VIRGINIA RD 25 WB 25 28.6 24.9 21-30 85.2 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE – POST EB

MISSION STREET
33 WEST CITY LIMIT TO
EL MOLINO AVE 25 20 21.8 19.3 16-25 97.3 REDUCE – 85TH PERCENTILE NP = NOT POSTED
NB = NORTHBOUND, SB = SOUTHBOUND
EB = EASTBOUND, WB = WESTBOUND
PAGE 150 of 358
30 STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

OAK GROVE AVENUE
37 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO
CIRCLE DR 25 25 26.0 23.3 20-29 95.3 NO CHANGE – 85TH PERCENTILE 38 CIRCLE DR TO
ROSALIND RD NP 25 27.4 23.8 20-29 89.6
POST & ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

OAK KNOLL AVENUE
39 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO
HUNTINGTON DRIVE 30 25 34.9 30.4 27-36 81.5
REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

OAKWOOD DRIVE
40 SAN MARINO AVE TO
SIERRA MADRE BLVD NP 25 27.0 24.6 20-29 92.7 POST & ESTABLISH – 85TH PERCENTILE

ORLANDO ROAD
41 CAMERON DR TO
CHESTER AVE 30 25 34.9 32.0 28-37 84.8 REDUCE – “HIGH PED & BIKE USERS”, CVC 22358.7(a)(2)

OXFORD ROAD
42 ORLANDO RD TO
MONTEREY RD 30 25 34.0 30.1 26-35 88.0 REDUCE – “HIGH PED & BIKE USERS”, CVC 22358.7(a)(2)

RIDGEWAY ROAD
43 HUNTINGTON DR TO
LORAIN RD NP 25 27.0 23.7 21-30 94.3 POST & ESTABLISH – 85TH PERCENTILE *NP = NOT POSTED
PAGE 151 of 358
31 STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

ROBLES AVENUE
44 SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO
SANTA ANITA AVE NP 25 28.0 24.2 21-30 78.2 POST & ESTABLISH – 85TH PERCENTILE

ROSALIND ROAD
45 VIRGINIA RD TO
OAK GROVE AVE (W) NP 25 31.0 27.2 24-33 83.2 POST & ESTABLISH – LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE

ROSE AVENUE
46 DEL MAR AVE TO
SAN GABRIEL BLVD 30 25 35.9 32.1 29-38 86.8
REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

SAINT ALBANS ROAD
47 MILL LANE TO
HUNTINGTON DR 25 NB 25 33.8 29.9 27-36 89.2
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 – POST SB
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]
48 HUNTINGTON DR TO
LORAIN RD 30 25 34.1 31.1 25-34 82.1
REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

SAN MARINO AVE
49 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO
EUSTON RD 25 25 31.5 26.2 23-32 68.1
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]
50 HUNTINGTON DR TO
SOUTH CITY LIMIT 25 25 33.6 27.9 24-33 67.0
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

SANTA ANITA AVENUE
51 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO
ROBLES AVE 30 25 34.8 30.0 25-34 79.7
REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

SHERWOOD ROAD
52 GRANADA AVE TO
ST.ALBANS RD 25 25 32.8 28.5 24-33 81.6
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]
53 ALHAMBRA RD TO
DEL MAR AVE 25 25 29.9 26.3 24-33 88.6
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]
NP = NOT POSTED
NB = NORTH BOUND
SB = SOUTHBOUND

PAGE 152 of 358
32 STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD /

SAN MARINO AVENUE
56 EUSTON RD TO

HUNTINGTON DR
35 NB
25 SB 25 34.9 31.0 27-36 82.5
NB – REDUCE, SB – NO CHANGE
“HIGH PED & BIKE USERS”, CVC 22358.7(a)(2)

STRATFORD ROAD
57 OXFORD RD TO
SAN MARINO AVE NP 25 28.2 25.1 21-30 94.3 POST & ESTABLISH – 85TH PERCENTILE

VIRGINIA ROAD
58 OAK GROVE AVE TO
ROSALIND RD 25 25 33.0 28.9 25-34 84.7 NO CHANGE – LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE 59 ROSALIND RD TO
EUSTON RD 25 25 30.8 27.3 24-33 92.3 NO CHANGE – LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE 60 EUSTON RD TO
HUNTINGTON DR 25 25 33.0 29.6 24-33 82.7
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]
61 HUNTINGTON DR TO
LORAIN RD 25 25 32.9 29.1 25-34 89.7
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

WEMBLEY ROAD
62 EUSTON RD TO
MONTEREY RD NP 25 25.8 23.3 19-28 91.7
POST & ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

WEST DRIVE
63 HUNTINGTON DR TO
SOUTH CITY LIMIT 25 25 29.2 25.6 23-32 93.4
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

NP = NOT POSTED
NB = NORTHBOUND
SB = SOUTHBOUND
PAGE 153 of 358
33 STREET LOCATION

EXISTING
SPEED
LIMIT

RECOMMENDED
SPEED
LIMIT
85TH

PERCENTILE
SPEED
MEDIAN
SPEED
10 MPH
PACE
RANGE

PERCENT

OF VEHICLES

IN PACE RECOMMENDATION - JUSTIFICATION

WILSON AVENUE
64 EL MOLINO AVE TO
GRANADA AVE NP 25 28.5 25.1 20-29 84.3 POST & ESTABLISH – 85TH PERCENTILE

WINSTON AVENUE
65 NORTH CITY LIMIT TO
HUNTINGTON DR 25 25 33.9 29.5 25-34 81.1
ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515
[ NO FUTURE SPEED SURVEYS REQUIRED ]

NP = NOT POSTED
PAGE 154 of 358

APPENDIX A
PAGE 155 of 358
California Blvd
Sierra Madre Blvd
Sierra Madre Blvd
San Marino Ave
Del Mar Ave
Del Mar Ave
Winston Ave
Winston Ave California Blvd Lombardy Rd Lombardy Rd Orlando Rd Oxford Rd
San Marino Ave
San Marino Ave
Euston Rd
Monterey Rd
Monterey Rd
Monterey Rd
San Gabriel Blvd
San Gabriel Blvd
Huntington Dr
Huntington Dr
Huntington
Dr
Lorain Rd Lorain Rd
Lorain Rd
Rose Ave
Longden Dr
Sherwood Rd
Sherwood
Rd
Virginia Rd
Virginia Rd
Saint Albans Rd
Saint Albans Rd
Roanoke Rd
Old Mill Rd
Chelsea Rd
Oak Knoll Ave
Sherwood Rd
El Molino Ave
Los Robles Ave
Los Robles Ave Euclid Ave
Garfield Ave
Wilson Ave
Granada Ave
Oak Grove Ave
Oak Grove Ave
Melville
Dr
Santa Anita Ave
Robles Ave
Bradburry Rd
Lacy Park The Huntington Library, Art Musem and Botanical Gardens Ridgeway Rd
Kenilworth Ave Melville
Rd
Canterbury
Rd
West
Dr
Bedford
Rd
Cambridge
Rd
Wembley
Rd
Kenilworth Ave LEGEND: SPEED LIMIT 30 SPEED LIMIT 35 SPEED LIMIT 25 SPEED LIMIT 20 Not to Scale N
W
S
E
Allen Ave
Chelsea Rd
Dr
Duarte
Oakwood Dr
Rosalind Rd
Stratford Rd
Consulting Traffic Engineers
www.hartzog-crabill.com
tel: (714) 731-9455 fax: (714) 731-9498
Tustin, California 92780
17821 East 17th Street, Suite 245
Prepared By:

Alhambra Rd
Mission St
Southwest AcademyValentine Elementary SchoolHuntington Middle SchoolSan Marino High SchoolSaints Felicitas & Perpetua Catholic SchoolK.L. Carver Elementary School Orlando Rd
Old Mill Rd
Ave Oak Grove
Rosalind Rd
Circle
Dr
Mill Ln
Virginia Rd
Canon Dr
Cameron Dr
Chester Ave
Alhambra Rd
Encino
Dr
PAGE 156 of 358

APPENDIX B
PAGE 157 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

ALHAMBRA ROAD SHERWOOD RD TO VIRGINIA AVE
DATE: 4/16/2026 & 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF VIRGINIA
DATE OF SURVEY 4/16/2026 & 4/21/2026
85th PERCENTILE 26.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 21 - 30 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 94.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH (NB) / NOT POSTED (SB)
15 MPH (advisory at bend onto Sherwood)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
600

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4:15-5:30 PM & 1:00-1:45 PM
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - VIRGINIA
CROSSWALKS AT VIRGINIA (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME 2:00-3:45pm (approaching Sherwood)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVE (at Virginia) / bend onto Sherwood

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / YES (NB) - YES / NO (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST SOUTHBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Alhambra 2026-01
The recommended 25 mph is 1.4 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed of 26.4 mph and meets CVC standards.

For enforcement, it is recommended to post a 25 mph speed limit sign for the southbound direction.

0.10 PAGE 158 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

ALHAMBRA ROAD SHERWOOD RD TO VIRGINIA AVE
DATE: 4/16/2026 & 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 4:15-5:30 PM & 1:00-1:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
30 X X X 3 2.6% 100.0%
X X 2 1.8% 97.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.3% 95.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.8% 90.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 81.6%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 18.4% 73.7% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 16.7% 55.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 15.8% 38.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.8% 22.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.8% 14.0%
20 X X X 3 2.6% 5.3%
X X 2 1.8% 2.6%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 114
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 94.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.3 %
File: Alhambra 2026-01
PAGE 159 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

ALHAMBRA ROAD SHERWOOD RD TO VIRGINIA AVE
DATE: 4/16/2026 & 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 4:15-5:30 PM & 1:00-1:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 100.0%
32 X 100.0%
31 100.0%
30 X 100.0% }PACE
29 X 97.4% }PACE
28 X 95.6% }PACE
27 X 90.4% }PACE
26 X 81.6% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
25 X 73.7% }PACE
24 X 55.3% }PACE
23 X 38.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
22 X 22.8% }PACE
21 X 14.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
20 X 5.3%
19 X 2.6%
18 X 0.9%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 94.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.3 %
Alhambra 2026-01
PAGE 160 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
ALLEN AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT (Homet) TO ORLANDO RD
DATE: 4/14/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:30 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF LOMBARDY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 32.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 25 - 34 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 83.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH (SB) / NOT POSTED (NB)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
6,100

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/14/2026
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - CALIFORNIA, STOP - ORLANDO

CROSSWALKS AT CALIFORNIA / ORLANDO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS (delivery trucks only)

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME CITY STREETS 2am-5am

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED w/DOTS / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINES (at approaches) ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST NORTHBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Allen 2026-02
The recommended 30 mph is 2.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended that a 30 mph speed sign be install for the northbound direction.

0.28 PAGE 161 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
ALLEN AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT (Homet) TO ORLANDO RD
DATE: 4/14/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:30 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 5.9% 96.1%
X X X X X X X 7 4.6% 90.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.3% 85.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.2% 80.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 13.8% 73.0% 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 15.1% 59.2% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 11.8% 44.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.3% 32.2%
X X X X X X X 7 4.6% 27.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.3% 22.4%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.5% 17.1%
X X X X X X X 7 4.6% 6.6%
X X X 3 2.0% 2.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 152
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.6 %
File: Allen 2026-02
PAGE 162 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
ALLEN AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT (Homet) TO ORLANDO RD
DATE: 4/14/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:30 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 98.7%
36 X 96.7%
35 X 96.1%
34 X 90.1% }PACE
33 X 85.5% }PACE
32 X 80.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
31 X 73.0% }PACE
30 X 59.2% }PACE
29 X 44.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
28 X 32.2% }PACE
27 X 27.0% }PACE
26 X 22.4% }PACE
25 X 17.1% }PACE
24 X 6.6% - - - - - -15PCT
23 X 2.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.6 %
Allen 2026-02
PAGE 163 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD WEST CITY LIMIT TO SIERRA MADRE BLVD DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:30 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF CANTERBURY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 32 - 41 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 88.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 5 1.00 0.28
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.06
TOTAL COLLISIONS 14 2.80 0.79

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
13,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/13/2026
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - ALLEN / SAN MARINO / SIERRA MADRE

CROSSWALKS AT ALLEN / SAN MARINO / SIERRA MADRE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS (delivery trucks only)

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINES
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NOTE: 30 MPH SPEED LIMIT IN CITY OF PASADENA File: California 2026-03 The recommended 35 mph is 4.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.70 PAGE 164 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD WEST CITY LIMIT TO SIERRA MADRE BLVD DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:30 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
X 1 0.5% 99.5%
X 1 0.5% 98.9%
X X X 3 1.6% 98.4%
45 0 0.0% 96.8%
X X 2 1.1% 96.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.2% 95.8%
X X X 3 1.6% 91.6%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 90.0%
40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.3% 87.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.5% 82.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.5% 72.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.0% 63.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 30 15.8% 53.2% 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.0% 37.4%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.0% 37.4% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.0% 27.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 12.1% 17.4% X X X X X X X X 8 4.2% 5.3%
X 1 0.5% 1.1%
30 X 1 0.5% 0.5%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 190
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 88.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 1.1 %
File: California 2026-03
PAGE 165 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD WEST CITY LIMIT TO SIERRA MADRE BLVD DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:30 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 99.5%
47 X 98.9%
46 X 98.4%
45 X 96.8%
44 X 96.8%
43 X 95.8%
42 X 91.6%
41 X 90.0% }PACE
40 X 87.4% }PACE
39 X 82.1% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
38 X 72.6% }PACE
HCI
37 X 63.2% }PACE
36 X 53.2% }PACE
35 X 37.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
34 X 27.4% }PACE
33 X 17.4% }PACE
32 X 5.3% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
31 X 1.1%
30 X 0.5%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 41 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 35.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 88.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 1.1 %
California 2026-03
PAGE 166 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF ALEGRIA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 37.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 30 - 39 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 94.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.25
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 13 2.60 1.63

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
10,650

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/13/2026
HCI
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SIERRA MADRE / SANTA ANITA / SAN GABRIEL

CROSSWALKS AT SIERRA MADRE / SANTA ANITA / SAN GABRIEL

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS (delivery trucks only)

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING CITY STREETS 2am-5am

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVE (e/o Santa Anita)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (medium density)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER 2 WAY LEFT TURN CENTERLANE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: California 2026-04
The recommended 35 mph is 2.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards.

0.41 PAGE 167 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
40 X X X X X X X 7 3.7% 100.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.9% 96.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.9% 88.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 24 12.6% 79.5% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 11.6% 66.8% 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 29 15.3% 55.3%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 29 15.3% 55.3% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 26 13.7% 40.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.4% 26.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.3% 18.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.4% 13.7%
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 4.7% 6.3%
X X 2 1.1% 1.6%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 190
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 3.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 94.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 1.6 %
File: California 2026-04
PAGE 168 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

CALIFORNIA BOULEVARD SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 96.3% }PACE
38 X 88.4% }PACE
HCI
37 X 79.5% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
36 X 66.8% }PACE
35 X 55.3% }PACE
34 X 40.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 26.3% }PACE
32 X 18.9% }PACE
31 X 13.7% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
30 X 6.3% }PACE
29 X 1.6%
28 X 0.5%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 39 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 3.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 94.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 1.6 %
California 2026-04
PAGE 169 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

CANTERBURY ROAD CALIFORNIA BLVD TO SIERRA MADRE BLVD
DATE: 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SIERRA MADRE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 33.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 25 - 34 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 87.2 %

POSTED SPEED LIMIT NOT POSTED

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - CALIFORNIA / SIERRA MADRE

CROSSWALKS NONE
250

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/21/2026
HCI

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL to SWEEPING "C" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (medium-heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER NO ROADWAY STRIPING

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE POST & ESTABLISH - "RESIDENCE DISTRICT" CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Canterbury 2026-05 This segment of Canterbury Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 29 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.39 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 25 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.39 PAGE 170 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

CANTERBURY ROAD CALIFORNIA BLVD TO SIERRA MADRE BLVD
DATE: 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X 6 5.5% 96.3%
X X X X X X 6 5.5% 90.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.3% 85.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 9.2% 78.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.3% 68.8%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 13.8% 61.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11.0% 47.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10.1% 36.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 9.2% 26.6%
X X X X X X X 7 6.4% 17.4%
25 X X X X X X X X 8 7.3% 11.0%
X X X 3 2.8% 3.7%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 109
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 25.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.7 %
File: Canterbury 2026-05
PAGE 171 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

CANTERBURY ROAD CALIFORNIA BLVD TO SIERRA MADRE BLVD
DATE: 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 99.1%
35 X 96.3%
34 X 90.8% }PACE
33 X 85.3% }PACE
32 X 78.0% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
31 X 68.8% }PACE
30 X 61.5% }PACE
29 X 47.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
28 X 36.7% }PACE
27 X 26.6% }PACE
26 X 17.4% }PACE
25 X 11.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
24 X 3.7%
23 X 0.9%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 25.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.7 %
Canterbury 2026-05
PAGE 172 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

CANTERBURY ROAD SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:45 AM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF PALOMAR

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 26.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 21 - 30 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 93.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - SIERRA MADRE / WINSTON / SAN ANITA / PALOMAR / SAN GABRIEL

CROSSWALKS AT SIERRA MADRE
250

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/21/2026
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT SIERRA MADRE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE w/DIP AT PALOMAR
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT - GRADUAL "S" CURVES (areas of)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / YES (medium-heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER NO ROADWAY STRIPING

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Canterbury 2026-06 This segment of Canterbury Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 42 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.48 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 30.7 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.48 PAGE 173 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

CANTERBURY ROAD SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:45 AM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
30 X X X 3 2.8% 100.0%
X X X X 4 3.7% 97.2%
X X X X X 5 4.6% 93.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12.0% 88.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12.0% 76.9%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 15.7% 64.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 16.7% 49.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12.0% 32.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.3% 20.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.6% 12.0%
20 X X X 3 2.8% 6.5%
X X X 3 2.8% 3.7%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 108
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 2.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 93.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.5 %
File: Canterbury 2026-06
PAGE 174 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

CANTERBURY ROAD SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:45 AM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 100.0%
32 X 100.0%
31 100.0%
30 X 100.0% }PACE
29 X 97.2% }PACE
28 X 93.5% }PACE
27 X 88.9% }PACE
26 X 76.9% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
25 X 64.8% }PACE
24 X 49.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
23 X 32.4% }PACE
22 X 20.4% }PACE
21 X 12.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
20 X 6.5%
19 X 3.7%
18 X 0.9%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 2.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 93.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.5 %
Canterbury 2026-06
PAGE 175 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

CHELSEA ROAD HUNTINGTON DR TO SHERWOOD RD
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 8:45 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF ALEGRIA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 29.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 23 - 32 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 95.4 %

POSTED SPEED LIMIT NOT POSTED

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - HUNTINGTON / OLD MILL
900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2026
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT HUNTINGTON / SHERWOOD

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS (delivery trucks only)

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER 2 HR PARKING 9am-5pm (near Huntington)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (medium density)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE YELLOW DASHED / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINES (at Huntington)

WIDE ROADWAY
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F) / BUSINESS (Huntington) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE POST & ESTABLISH - "RESIDENCE DISTRICT" CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Chelsea 2026-07
This segment of Chelsea Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

This segment has 16 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.23 miles, which meets the minimum of 16 dwelling houses or business structures per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.23 PAGE 176 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

CHELSEA ROAD HUNTINGTON DR TO SHERWOOD RD
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 8:45 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X 2 1.8% 100.0%
X X 2 1.8% 98.2%
X X X X X 5 4.6% 96.3%
X X X X X X 6 5.5% 91.7%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.9% 86.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 13.8% 74.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.9% 60.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 13.8% 48.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 13.8% 34.9%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10.1% 21.1%
X X X X X X X 7 6.4% 11.0%
X X X X 4 3.7% 4.6%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 109
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 3.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 27.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 95.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 0.9 %
File: Chelsea 2026-07
PAGE 177 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

CHELSEA ROAD HUNTINGTON DR TO SHERWOOD RD
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 8:45 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 98.2%
32 X 96.3% }PACE
31 X 91.7% }PACE
30 X 86.2% }PACE
29 X 74.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
28 X 60.6% }PACE
27 X 48.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
26 X 34.9% }PACE
25 X 21.1% }PACE
24 X 11.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
23 X 4.6% }PACE
22 X 0.9%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 3.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 27.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 95.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 0.9 %
Chelsea 2026-07
PAGE 178 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

DEL MAR AVENUE HUNTINGTON DR TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF MELVILLE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 39.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 76.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH / *25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HUNTINGTON, STOP - LORAIN / LONGDEN 6,950

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/13/2026
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT HUNTINTINGTON (sch) / LORAIN

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS (delivery trucks only)

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER 2 HR PARKING 2am-5pm & 2 HR PARKING 9am-5pm

BIKE LANES / AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES (Huntington to Melville)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (heavy density)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW & SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINES
SMALL RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND (at Longden)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F) / BASEBALL FIELD (rear of-at Melville) / CHURCH & BUSINESS (at Huntington) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Del Mar 2026-08
*25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE
This section of Del Mar Avenue is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential (fronting), a baseball field, church and commercial/business activity at Huntington Drive. The speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of 39.0 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 29 to 38 mph which may suggest a 35 mph speed limit. To prevent a 10 mph jump in speed limit from the northerly adjacent segment of Winston Avenue with a 25 mph speed limit, it is recommended to retain the existing speed limit of 30 mph.

0.71 PAGE 179 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

DEL MAR AVENUE HUNTINGTON DR TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.4% 100.0%
X 1 0.4% 99.6%
X 1 0.4% 99.1%
45 X 1 0.4% 98.7%
X 1 0.4% 98.2%
X X X X X 5 2.2% 97.8%
X X X X X X X 7 3.1% 95.5%
X X X X X X 6 2.7% 92.4%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.9% 89.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 4.9% 84.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.5% 79.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 9.4% 75.4% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.7% 66.1%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 10.3% 59.4%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 10.3% 59.4% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 9.4% 49.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 5.8% 39.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 10.3% 33.9% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.7% 23.7%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.1% 17.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.7% 9.8%
X 1 0.4% 3.1%
X X X X X 5 2.2% 2.7%
0 0.0% 0.4%
25 X 1 0.4% 0.4%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 224
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.1 %
File: Del Mar 2026-08
PAGE 180 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

DEL MAR AVENUE HUNTINGTON DR TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 9:30 AM - 10:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 99.6%
46 X 99.1%
45 X 98.7%
44 X 98.2%
43 X 97.8%
42 X 95.5%
41 X 92.4%
40 X 89.7%
39 X 84.8% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
38 X 79.9% }PACE
HCI
37 X 75.4% }PACE
36 X 66.1% }PACE
35 X 59.4% }PACE
34 X 49.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 39.7% }PACE
32 X 33.9% }PACE
31 X 23.7% }PACE
30 X 17.0% }PACE
29 X 9.8% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
28 X 3.1%
27 X 2.7%
26 X 0.4%
25 X 0.4%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 39.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 20.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 76.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.1 %
Del Mar 2026-08
PAGE 181 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

DUARTE ROAD LORAIN RD TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF HILLARD

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 30.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 23 - 32 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 94.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SAN GABRIEL, STOP - ROSE, STOP - LORAIN 5,150

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/13/2026
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT SAN GABRIEL / HILLARD / ROSE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING CITY STREETS 2am-5am

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / FEW

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DOTS & SOLID DBL YELLOW w/DOTS CENTERLINES ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F + NF = FRONTING + NON-FRONTING File: Duarte 2026-09
This segment of Duarte Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. This segment has 21 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.24 miles, which exceeds the minimum of 16 dwelling houses per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.24 PAGE 182 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

DUARTE ROAD LORAIN RD TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X X 2 1.5% 99.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 11.8% 97.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.3% 86.0%
30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.4% 75.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.6% 68.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 14.7% 61.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.3% 47.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 27 19.9% 36.8% 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.6% 16.9%
X X 2 1.5% 7.4%
X X X 3 2.2% 5.9%
X X 2 1.5% 3.7%
X 1 0.7% 2.2%
20 0 0.0% 1.5%
X 1 0.7% 1.5%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 136
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 2.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 27.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 94.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.7 %
File: Duarte 2026-09
PAGE 183 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

DUARTE ROAD LORAIN RD TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 99.3%
32 X 97.8% }PACE
31 X 86.0% }PACE
30 X 75.7% - - - - - - - - 85PCT }PACE
29 X 68.4% }PACE
28 X 61.8% }PACE
27 X 47.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
26 X 36.8% }PACE
25 X 16.9% }PACE
24 X 7.4% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
23 X 5.9% }PACE
22 X 3.7%
21 X 2.2%
20 X 1.5%
19 X 1.5%
18 X 0.7%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 2.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 27.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 94.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.7 %
Duarte 2026-09
PAGE 184 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

EL MOLINO AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO MONTEREY RD
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF ARDMORE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 31.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 24 - 33 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 89.9 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
25 MPH FLASHING BEACON (SB) NEAR NCL

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 4 0.80 0.72
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 7 1.40 1.27

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - MISSION / MONTEREY
CROSSWALKS AT MISSION / MONTEREY (sch)
8,900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/2/2026
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT MISSION / MONTEREY (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO STOPPING ANYTIME (at Mission) / NO PARKING 7am-9am

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP/DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE w/SLIGHT BEND (at Mission)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density medium)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at aproaches) ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F+NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - ESTABLISH AS RESIDENTCE DISTRICT CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: El Molino 2026-10
This segment of El Molino Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 25 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.34 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 21.8 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.34 PAGE 185 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

EL MOLINO AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO MONTEREY RD
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X 3 1.9% 95.6%
X 1 0.6% 93.7%
X X X X X 5 3.1% 93.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7% 89.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.7% 84.3%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 13.2% 78.6% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 11.9% 65.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 13.8% 53.5% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 11.3% 39.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 13.8% 28.3% 25 X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.3% 14.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.0% 8.2%
X X X 3 1.9% 3.1%
X 1 0.6% 1.3%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 159
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 27.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 89.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 25.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.1 %
File: El Molino 2026-10
PAGE 186 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

EL MOLINO AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO MONTEREY RD
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 1:30 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 99.4%
HCI
37 X 96.9%
36 X 96.9%
35 X 95.6%
34 X 93.7%
33 X 93.1% }PACE
32 X 89.9% }PACE
31 X 84.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
30 X 78.6% }PACE
29 X 65.4% }PACE
28 X 53.5% }PACE
27 X 39.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
26 X 28.3% }PACE
25 X 14.5% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
24 X 8.2% }PACE
23 X 3.1%
22 X 1.3%
21 X 0.6%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 27.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 89.9 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 25.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.1 %
El Molino 2026-10
PAGE 187 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

EL MOLINO AVENUE MONTEREY RD TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT (HUNTINGTON DR) DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF PLYMOUTH

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 34.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 25 - 34 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 81.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.19
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 4 0.80 0.75

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - MONTEREY(sch) / WILSON / PASQUALITO / HUNTINGTON

CROSSWALKS AT MONTEREY / WILSON / PASQUALITO
7,350

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/2/2026
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT MONTEREY / WILSON / PASQUALITO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME 7am-9am

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP/DOWNHILL GRADES ?
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT CURVE (at Wilson)
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (at Wilson)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density medium)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at approaches)

NARROW SHOULDERS

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - ESTABLISH AS "RESIDENCE DISTRICT" CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: El Molino 2026-11
This segment of El Molino Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 27 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.40 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 25.6 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.40 PAGE 188 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

EL MOLINO AVENUE MONTEREY RD TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT (HUNTINGTON DR) DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.5%
40 X X 2 1.0% 99.5%
X X 2 1.0% 98.5%
X X X 3 1.5% 97.5%
X X X X X 5 2.5% 96.0%
X X X X X X X 7 3.5% 93.5%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.5% 89.9%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.5% 89.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.5% 84.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 11.1% 76.9% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.5% 65.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 11.6% 57.3% 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.5% 45.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.5% 38.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.5% 30.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 8.5% 22.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.0% 13.6%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.5% 9.5%
X X X X X 5 2.5% 3.0%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 199
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 30.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.0 %
File: El Molino 2026-11
PAGE 189 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

EL MOLINO AVENUE MONTEREY RD TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT (HUNTINGTON DR) DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 99.5%
40 X 99.5%
39 X 98.5%
38 X 97.5%
HCI
37 X 96.0%
36 X 93.5%
35 X 89.9%
34 X 84.4% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
33 X 76.9% }PACE
32 X 65.8% }PACE
31 X 57.3% }PACE
30 X 45.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
29 X 38.2% }PACE
28 X 30.7% }PACE
27 X 22.1% }PACE
26 X 13.6% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
25 X 9.5% }PACE
24 X 3.0%
23 X 0.5%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 30.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.0 %
El Molino 2026-11
PAGE 190 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

EUSTON ROAD VIRGINIA RD TO WEMBLEY RD
DATE: 4/15/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF PATON / KENSINGTON

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 27.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 22 - 31 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 96.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
20 MPH (advisory curve speed at Kensington)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - PATTON-KENSINGTON / VIRGINIA

CROSSWALKS AT VIRGINIA
1,100

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/15/2025
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT VIRGINIA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP/DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (at curves)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - ESTABLISH AS "RESIDENCE DISTRICT" CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Euston 2026-12
This segment of Euston Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 24 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.33 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 21.1 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.33 PAGE 191 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

EUSTON ROAD VIRGINIA RD TO WEMBLEY RD
DATE: 4/15/2025 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
X 1 0.8% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.2%
X X 2 1.6% 99.2%
30 X X X X 4 3.3% 97.6%
X X X 3 2.4% 94.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.9% 91.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.5% 82.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 11.4% 76.4%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 26 21.1% 65.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 17.9% 43.9% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 13.8% 26.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.8% 12.2%
X X 2 1.6% 2.4%
20 X 1 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 123
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 22 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 2.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 96.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 2.4 %
File: Euston 2026-12
PAGE 192 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

EUSTON ROAD VIRGINIA RD TO WEMBLEY RD
DATE: 4/15/2025 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 100.0%
32 X 99.2%
31 99.2% }PACE
30 X 97.6% }PACE
29 X 94.3% }PACE
28 X 91.9% }PACE
27 X 82.9% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
26 X 76.4% }PACE
25 X 65.0% }PACE
24 X 43.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
23 X 26.0% }PACE
22 X 12.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
21 X 2.4%
20 X 0.8%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 22 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 2.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 96.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 2.4 %
Euston 2026-12
PAGE 193 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

EUSTON ROAD WEMBLEY RD TO SAN MARINO AVE
DATE: 4/14/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF BEDFORD

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 33.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 25 - 34 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.60
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 4 0.80 2.38

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - SAN MARINO / OXFPRD / CAMBRIDGE

CROSSWALKS AT SAN MARINO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
2,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/14/2025
HCI

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER HEAVY ON-STREET PARKING, PEDS & BIKES DURING EVENTS (at Library-Museum-Gardens)

PEDS & BIKES USE STREET

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES / DIP (at Waverly) HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (at Wembley)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF) / THE HUNTINGTON'S (library, museum, lily pond, art gallery at Oxford) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - "HIGH PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Euston 2026-13
This portion of Euston Road is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land uses on the south-side of road is residential with direct driveways, and the entire north-side is The Huntington's with a gallery, library, museum, lily pond and more. During events at The Huntington's facilities this area is used for over flow on-street parking, pedestrian traffic can be very heavy in this area and with no sidewalks on the northside of the street pedestrians and bicyclists use the main roadway. The roadway has slight up-downhill grades, several "T" intersections (south-side), a moderate "C" curve at Wembley Road, and areas of red curb near the Huntington's. The speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of 33.9 mph which may suggest a 30 mph speed limit. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and bike users", which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For this segment, there is The Huntington's, and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the speed limit be maintained at 25 mph.

0.46 PAGE 194 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

EUSTON ROAD WEMBLEY RD TO SAN MARINO AVE
DATE: 4/14/2025 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X 5 3.4% 89.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.0% 85.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.0% 79.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.0% 73.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 24 16.1% 67.8% 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 15.4% 51.7% X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 36.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 29.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.4% 20.8%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 13.4%
25 X X X X X X X X X 9 6.0% 9.4%
X X X 3 2.0% 3.4%
X X 2 1.3% 1.3%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 149
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.4 %
File: Euston 2026-13
PAGE 195 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

EUSTON ROAD WEMBLEY RD TO SAN MARINO AVE
DATE: 4/14/2025 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 94.0%
35 X 89.3%
34 X 85.9% }PACE
33 X 79.9% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
32 X 73.8% }PACE
31 X 67.8% }PACE
30 X 51.7% }PACE
29 X 36.2% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
28 X 29.5% }PACE
27 X 20.8% }PACE
26 X 13.4% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
25 X 9.4% }PACE
24 X 3.4%
23 X 1.3%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.4 %
Euston 2026-13
PAGE 196 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

GARFIELD AVENUE HUNTINGTON DR TO MONTEREY ROAD
DATE: 3/12/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF CALLITA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 38.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 31 - 40 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 90.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.29
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.10
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.10
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 12 2.40 1.14

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HUNTINGTON, STOP - MONTEREY

CROSSWALKS AT HUNTINGTON / OAK / MONTEREY

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
12,250

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/12/2026
HCI

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME CITY STREETS 2ma-5am

AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT "C" CURVE (at Oak)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / MANY

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DOTS CENTERLINE / SOLID DBL YELLOW w/DOTS CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / CHURCH / YMCA
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Garfield 2026-14
This section of Garfield Avenue is two lane roadway. The adjacent land use is residential, church and YMCA. The speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of 38.3 mph which may suggest a 35 mph speed limit. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had 3 collisions that were speed related, and 1 collision involved serious injuries, and 1 collision involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions.

In accordance with CVC 22358.7 (a)(1), this segment is designated as a "Safety Corridor" which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended to reduce the existing 35 mph speed limit to 30 mph.

0.47 PAGE 197 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

GARFIELD AVENUE HUNTINGTON DR TO MONTEREY ROAD
DATE: 3/12/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
45 X 1 0.5% 99.5%
0 0.0% 99.0%
0 0.0% 99.0%
X X X X X 5 2.6% 99.0%
0 0.0% 96.3%
40 X X X X X X X X X 9 4.7% 96.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 9.4% 91.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 11.5% 82.2% X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6.8% 70.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 12.0% 63.9% 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 28 14.7% 51.8%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 28 14.7% 51.8% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 10.5% 37.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 9.9% 26.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.9% 16.8%
X X X X X X 6 3.1% 8.9%
30 X X X 3 1.6% 5.8%
X X X 3 1.6% 4.2%
X X X X 4 2.1% 2.6%
X 1 0.5% 0.5%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 191
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 3.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 90.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.8 %
File: Garfield 2026-14
PAGE 198 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

GARFIELD AVENUE HUNTINGTON DR TO MONTEREY ROAD
DATE: 3/12/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 99.5%
44 X 99.0%
43 X 99.0%
42 X 99.0%
41 X 96.3%
40 X 96.3% }PACE
39 X 91.6% }PACE
38 X 82.2% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
HCI
38 X 82.2% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
37 X 70.7% }PACE
36 X 63.9% }PACE
35 X 51.8% }PACE
34 X 37.2% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 26.7% }PACE
32 X 16.8% }PACE
31 X 8.9% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
30 X 5.8%
29 X 4.2%
28 X 2.6%
27 X 0.5%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 40 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 3.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 90.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.8 %
Garfield 2026-14
PAGE 199 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

GRANADA AVENUE WILSON AVE TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 2:30 PM - 3:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF WILSON

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 34.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 26 - 35 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 86.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HUNTINGTON, STOP - WILSON
3,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/2/2026
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT HUNTINGTON

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER 2 HR PARKING 8am-5pm
ARES OF RED CURB (near the school)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UP/DOWNHILL GRADE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT CURVE (at Huntingont)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW w/DOTS CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F) / SCHOOL / COMMERCIAL (at Huntington) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Granada 2026-15
This segment of Granada Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

This segment has 16 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.15miles, which meets the minimum of 16 dwelling houses or business structures per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.15 PAGE 200 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

GRANADA AVENUE WILSON AVE TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 2:30 PM - 3:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.3% 90.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.3% 80.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 69.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 13.1% 63.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 50.3%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 11.0% 44.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.3% 33.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.2% 24.8%
X X X X X X 6 4.1% 18.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.3% 14.5%
25 X X X X X X 6 4.1% 4.1%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 145
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 26 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 30.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 86.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.1 %
File: Granada 2026-15
PAGE 201 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

GRANADA AVENUE WILSON AVE TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 2:30 PM - 3:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 97.9%
36 X 95.9%
35 X 90.3% }PACE
34 X 80.0% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
33 X 69.7% }PACE
32 X 63.4% }PACE
31 X 50.3% }PACE
30 X 44.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
29 X 33.1% }PACE
28 X 24.8% }PACE
27 X 18.6% }PACE
26 X 14.5% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
25 X 4.1%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 26 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 9.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 30.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 86.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.1 %
Granada 2026-15
PAGE 202 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

GRANADA AVENUE HUNTINGTON DR TO ALHAMBRA RD
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 3:00 PM - 3:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF PINE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 32.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 25 - 34 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 90.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL- HUNTINGTON /ALHAMBRA, STOP ROUNDABT- CYNTHIA-SHERWOOD/ ROXBURY CROSSWALKS AT HUNTINGTON (sch) / CYNTHIA-SHERWOOD / ROXBURY / ALHAMBRA 5,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/2/2026
HCI

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCK TRAFFIC OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER SPECIAL TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT / SPEED CHECKED BY RADAR NO PARKING CITY STREETS 2am-5am / AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UP/DOWNHILL GRADE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE / SMALL RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND (at Huntington)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Granada 2026-16
This segment of Granada Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 40 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.54 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 34.6 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.54 PAGE 203 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

GRANADA AVENUE HUNTINGTON DR TO ALHAMBRA RD
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 3:00 PM - 3:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X 6 3.4% 96.0%
X X X X X X X 7 4.0% 92.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.5% 88.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 26 14.9% 81.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.9% 66.1%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.9% 55.2% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.8% 44.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 25 14.4% 34.5% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.6% 20.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.7% 11.5%
25 X X X X X X X 7 4.0% 5.7%
X X 2 1.1% 1.7%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 174
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 90.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 1.7 %
File: Granada 2026-16
PAGE 204 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

GRANADA AVENUE HUNTINGTON DR TO ALHAMBRA RD
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 3:00 PM - 3:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 98.9%
HCI
37 X 98.9%
36 X 98.3%
35 X 96.0%
34 X 92.5% }PACE
33 X 88.5% }PACE
32 X 81.0% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
31 X 66.1% }PACE
30 X 55.2% }PACE
29 X 44.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
28 X 34.5% }PACE
27 X 20.1% }PACE
26 X 11.5% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
25 X 5.7% }PACE
24 X 1.7%
23 X 0.6%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 90.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 1.7 %
Granada 2026-16
PAGE 205 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE GARFIELD AVE TO VIRGINIA RD
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:50 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA EASTBOUND

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF ATLANTIC

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 33 - 42 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 74.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH /*25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.05
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.02
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 24 4.80 0.57

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES - EASTBOUND
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - GARFIELD / ATLANTIC / GRANADA / OAK KNOLL / ST.ALBANS / VIRGINIA CROSSWALKS at GARFIELD /ATLANTIC /CHELSEA /OAK KNOLL /GRANADA (sch) /ST.ALBANS (sch) /VIRGINIA (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
18,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/13/2026
HCI

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES, NO TRUCKS OVER 8 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER 2 HR PARKING 9am-5pm / ANGLED PARKING (Oak Knoll to Old Mill)

AREAS OF RED CURB / GREEN CURB / YELLOW CURB

BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (many)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER WIDE LANDSCAPED MEDIAN w/CROSS-LANE WITHIN MEDIAN (at major intersections) ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (N+NF) / BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL / SCHOOLS (at Virginia) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Huntington eb 2026-17 * 25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE
This section of Huntington Drive is three lanes roadway eastbound. The adjacent land use is residential, business and commercial. The speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of 43.9 mph which may suggest a 40 mph speed limit. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had 2 collisions that were speed related, and 1 collision involved serious injuries, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions. In accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(1), this segment is designated as a "Safety Corridor" which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph.

Collectively, this segment and other City streets designated as a “Safety Corridor” did not exceed more than 20% of City maintained streets. Therefore, it is recommended to reduce the existing 40 mph speed limit to 35 mph.

1.26 PAGE 206 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE GARFIELD AVE TO VIRGINIA RD
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:50 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

EASTBOUND
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X 1 1.2% 100.0%
X 1 1.2% 98.8%
X 1 1.2% 97.6%
X X X 3 3.7% 96.3%
X X 2 2.4% 92.7%
45 X X X X 4 4.9% 90.2%
X X X X X 5 6.1% 85.4%
X X X 3 3.7% 79.3%
X X X X 4 4.9% 75.6%
X X X X X X X X X 9 11.0% 70.7%
40 X X X X X X X 7 8.5% 59.8%
X X X X X X X 7 8.5% 51.2%
X X X X X X 6 7.3% 42.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 9.8% 35.4%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 9.8% 35.4%
X X X X X X 6 7.3% 25.6%
35 X X X X X 5 6.1% 18.3%
X X X X X 5 6.1% 12.2%
X X X X 4 4.9% 6.1%
X 1 1.2% 1.2%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 82
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 24.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 1.2 %
File: Huntington eb 2026-17
PAGE 207 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE GARFIELD AVE TO VIRGINIA RD
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 9:50 AM - 10:20 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

EASTBOUND

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 98.8%
48 X 97.6%
47 X 96.3%
46 X 92.7%
45 X 90.2%
44 X 85.4%
43 X 79.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT
42 X 75.6% }PACE
41 X 70.7% }PACE
40 X 59.8% }PACE
39 X 51.2% }PACE
HCI
38 X 42.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 35.4% }PACE
36 X 25.6% }PACE
35 X 18.3% }PACE
34 X 12.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
33 X 6.1% }PACE
32 X 1.2%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 42 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 24.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 74.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 1.2 %
Huntington eb 2026-17
PAGE 208 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE VIRGINIA RD TO SAN MARINO AVE
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:25 AM - 10:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA EASTBOUND

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF VIRGINIA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 84.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH /*25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 8 1.60 0.32
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 44 8.80 1.78

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - VIRGINIA / WEST / SAN MARINO
CROSSWALKS AT VIRGINIA (sch) / WEST (sch) / SAN MARINO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES (many) / YES (many)
19,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/13/2026
HCI
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES (many) / YES (many)

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO TRUCKS OVER 8 TONS
2 HR PARKING 9am-5pm / ANGELED PARKING (Bedford to San Marino)

AREAS OF GREEN CURB / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (medium)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER WIDE LANDSCAPED MEDIAN w/CROSS-LANE WITHIN MEDIAN (at major intersections)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / COMMERCIAL-BUSINESS / SCHOOLS / LIBRARY / COMMUNITY CTR RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Huntington eb 2026-18 *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE
This section of Huntington Drive has three lanes of travel for the eastbound. The adjacent land uses include some residential, commercial business with angled parking, Valentine Elementary school, Huntington Middle School, Library and community center.

The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 42.5 mph which may suggest a 40 mph speed limit. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and bike users", which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of the segment, there are two schools, a library, community center, business activity area and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to 35 mph.

0.70 PAGE 209 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE VIRGINIA RD TO SAN MARINO AVE
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:25 AM - 10:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

EASTBOUND
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 1.4% 100.0%
X 1 1.4% 98.6%
45 X X 2 2.9% 97.1%
X X X X 4 5.8% 94.2%
X X X X X 5 7.2% 88.4%
X X X 3 4.3% 81.2%
X X X X 4 5.8% 76.8%
40 X X X X X X X 7 10.1% 71.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 13.0% 60.9%
X X X X X X 6 8.7% 47.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 11.6% 39.1%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X X 8 11.6% 39.1%
X X X X X X 6 8.7% 27.5%
35 X X X X X X 6 8.7% 18.8%
X X X X 4 5.8% 10.1%
X X X 3 4.3% 4.3%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 69
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 84.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.1 %
File: Huntington eb 2026-18
PAGE 210 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE VIRGINIA RD TO SAN MARINO AVE
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 10:25 AM - 10:55 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

EASTBOUND

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 98.6%
45 X 97.1%
44 X 94.2% }PACE
43 X 88.4% }PACE
42 X 81.2% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
41 X 76.8% }PACE
40 X 71.0% }PACE
39 X 60.9% }PACE
HCI
38 X 47.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 39.1% }PACE
36 X 27.5% }PACE
35 X 18.8% }PACE
34 X 10.1% - - - - - -15PCT
33 X 4.3%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 84.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.1 %
Huntington eb 2026-18
PAGE 211 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE SAN MARINO AVE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA EASTBOUND

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF DEL MAR

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 41.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 34 - 43 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 81.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH /*25 MPH (electronic school sign)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.03
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.07
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 28 5.60 0.95

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SAN MARINO / DEL MAR / BRADBURY / SAN GABRIEL /** PALOMAR CROSSWALKS AT SAN MARINO /RIDGEWAY /KENILWORTH /DEL MAR (sch)/ BRADBURY (sch)/ SAN GABRIEL PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES (heavy) / YES
17,400

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/13/2026
HCI
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES, NO TRUCKS OVER 8 TONS
ON-STREET PARKING YES, AREAS OF ANGLED PARKING (San Marino to Westhaven) OTHER 20 MINIUTE PARKING & 2 HR PARKING 9am-5pm (at angled parking)

AREAS OF RED CURB & GREEN CURB / BUS STOPS
** SIGNALIZED PED XING (at Palomar, activited during school arrival-release)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (medium-heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER WIDE LANDSCAPED MEDIAN w/CROSS-LANE WITHIN MEDIAN (at major intersections)

ADJACENT LAND USE RES (NF) / BUSINESS-COMMERCIAL /CHURCH / FIRE DEPT / POST OFC / SCHOOLS (WB) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Huntington eb 2026-19 *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE
This section of Huntington Drive has three lanes of travel for the eastbound. The adjacent land uses are residential non-fronting, heavy business/commercial activity with many shops and restaurants, fire department, church, and post office. Field observations include angled parking and heavy pedestrian traffic at business area, 2 hour parking 9am to 5pm, and areas of red curb and green curb. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 41.8 mph which may suggest a 40 mph speed limit. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and bike users, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of the segment, there are many restaurants and shops, and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to at 35 mph.

0.93 PAGE 212 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE SAN MARINO AVE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

EASTBOUND
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 1.5% 100.0%
45 X X 2 3.0% 98.5%
X X X 3 4.5% 95.5%
X X X 3 4.5% 90.9%
X X X X 4 6.1% 86.4%
X X X X X 5 7.6% 80.3%
40 X X X X X X X 7 10.6% 72.7%
X X X X X X 6 9.1% 62.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 12.1% 53.0%
X X X X X X X 7 10.6% 40.9%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X 7 10.6% 40.9%
X X X X X 5 7.6% 30.3%
35 X X X X 4 6.1% 22.7%
X X X X X 5 7.6% 16.7%
X X X 3 4.5% 9.1%
X X 2 3.0% 4.5%
X 1 1.5% 1.5%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 66
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.1 %
File: Huntington eb 2026-19
PAGE 213 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE SAN MARINO AVE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

EASTBOUND

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 98.5%
44 X 95.5%
43 X 90.9% }PACE
42 X 86.4% }PACE
41 X 80.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
40 X 72.7% }PACE
39 X 62.1% }PACE
HCI
38 X 53.0% }PACE
37 X 40.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
36 X 30.3% }PACE
35 X 22.7% }PACE
34 X 16.7% }PACE
33 X 9.1% - - - - - -15PCT
32 X 4.5%
31 X 1.5%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.1 %
Huntington eb 2026-19
PAGE 214 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE GARFIELD AVE TO VIRGINIA RD
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA WESTBOUND

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF ST ALBANS

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 83.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 11 2.20 0.27
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.05
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 55 11.00 1.37

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES - WESTBOUND
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - GARFIELD / ATLANTIC / GRANADA / OAK KNOLL / ST.ALBANS / VIRGINIA CROSSWALKS at GARFIELD /ATLANTIC /CHELSEA /OAK KNOLL /GRANADA (sch) /ST.ALBANS (sch) /VIRGINIA (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
17,500

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/13/2026
HCI

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER BUS STOPS

AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (few)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER WIDE LANDSCAPED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BUSINESS-COMMERCIAL (dense) / SCHOOLS (at Granada & Virginia) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Huntington wb 2026-20 This westbound portion of Huntington Drive has three lanes. The adjacent land use is residential, schools at Virginia Road and Granada Avenue, and commercial/business activity areas. Other field observations includes the roadway has many cross streets and crosswalks, wide median with roads and signals, bus stops and areas of red curb. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 43.8 mph which may suggest a 40 mph speed limit. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and bike users, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of the segment, there are many restaurants and shops, and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to at 35 mph.

1.26 PAGE 215 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE GARFIELD AVE TO VIRGINIA RD
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

WESTBOUND
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 X X 2 2.7% 100.0%
X 1 1.4% 97.3%
X 1 1.4% 95.9%
X 1 1.4% 94.5%
X X X 3 4.1% 93.2%
45 X X 2 2.7% 89.0%
X X X X 4 5.5% 86.3%
X X X X X 5 6.8% 80.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 11.0% 74.0%
X X X X X X X 7 9.6% 63.0%
40 X X X X X X X X 8 11.0% 53.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 12.3% 42.5%
X X X X X X X 7 9.6% 30.1%
X X X X X X 6 8.2% 20.5%
X X X 3 4.1% 12.3%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X 3 4.1% 12.3%
35 X X X X 4 5.5% 8.2%
X 1 1.4% 2.7%
X 1 1.4% 1.4%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 73
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 2.7 %
File: Huntington wb 2026-20
PAGE 216 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE GARFIELD AVE TO VIRGINIA RD
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

WESTBOUND

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 97.3%
48 X 95.9%
47 X 94.5%
46 X 93.2%
45 X 89.0%
44 X 86.3% }PACE
43 X 80.8% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
42 X 74.0% }PACE
41 X 63.0% }PACE
40 X 53.4% }PACE
39 X 42.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
39 X 42.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 30.1% }PACE
37 X 20.5% }PACE
36 X 12.3% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
35 X 8.2% }PACE
34 X 2.7%
33 X 1.4%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 2.7 %
Huntington wb 2026-20
PAGE 217 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE VIRGINIA RD TO SAN MARINO AVE
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:10 PM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA WESTBOUND

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF ALBANS

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 35 - 44 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 88.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT NOT POSTED / *25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.09
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 27 5.40 1.18

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3 LANES - WESTBOUND

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - VIRGINIA / CAMBRIDGE / SAN MARINO CROSSWALKS AT VIRGINIA (sch) / CAMBRIDGE (sch) / SAN MARINO (sch) PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES (many) / YES (many)

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES
17,950

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/13/2026
HCI

TRUCK TRAFFIC YES

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER ANGLED PARKING (Monterey to Westhaven)

AREAS OF RED CURB / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (few)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER WIDE LANDSCAPED MEDIAN w/CROSS-LANE WITHIN MEDIAN (at major intersections) ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL / SCHOOL (at Virginia EB) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE POST & ESTABLISH - "HIGH PED & BIKE USERS”, CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:
*25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE File: Huntington wb 2026-21 F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING
This westbound section of Huntington Drive has 3 and 4 lanes of travel. The adjacent land uses are residential non-fronting, heavy business, commercial dwellings with shops and restaurants, San Marino High School, and St Felicitas Catholic School.

Other field observations are the section from Winston Ave to Ridgeway Road there are angled parking (2 hr.), heavy pedestrian traffic at the business activity area. Also there are areas of red curb and green curb, and heavy pedestrian and bike traffic near the schools . The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 43.7 mph which may suggest a 40 mph speed limit.

However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and bike users, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of the segment, there are many restaurants and shops, high school, catholic school and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the City install 35 mph speed signs.

0.70 PAGE 218 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE VIRGINIA RD TO SAN MARINO AVE
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:10 PM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 1.5% 100.0%
X 1 1.5% 98.5%
0 0.0% 97.1%
45 X X 2 2.9% 97.1%
X X X X 4 5.9% 94.1%
X X X X X 5 7.4% 88.2%
X X X X X 5 7.4% 80.9%
X X X X X X X 7 10.3% 73.5%
40 X X X X X X 6 8.8% 63.2%
X X X X X X X 7 10.3% 54.4%
X X X X X X X 7 10.3% 44.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 11.8% 33.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 11.8% 22.1%
35 X X X 3 4.4% 10.3%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X 3 4.4% 10.3%
X X 2 2.9% 5.9%
X 1 1.5% 2.9%
X 1 1.5% 1.5%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 68
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 5.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 88.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.9 %
File: Huntington wb 2026-21
PAGE 219 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE VIRGINIA RD TO SAN MARINO AVE
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:10 PM - 12:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

WESTBOUND

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 98.5%
46 X 97.1%
45 X 97.1%
44 X 94.1% }PACE
43 X 88.2% }PACE
42 X 80.9% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
41 X 73.5% }PACE
40 X 63.2% }PACE
39 X 54.4% }PACE
38 X 44.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
38 X 44.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
37 X 33.8% }PACE
36 X 22.1% }PACE
35 X 10.3% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
34 X 5.9%
33 X 2.9%
32 X 1.5%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 44 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 5.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 38.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 88.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.9 %
Huntington wb 2026-21
PAGE 220 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE SAN MARINO AVE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA WESTBOUND

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF PALOMAR

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 43.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 36 - 45 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 85.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH / *25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 5 1.00 0.20
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.04
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 41 8.20 1.60

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 3-4 LANES- WESTBOUND (4 lanes San Gabriel to Winston)

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - SAN GABRIEL / BRADBURY-GAINSBOROUGH / WINSTON / SAN MARINO CROSSWALKS AT SAN GABRIEL (sch) / PALOMAR (**sch) / BRADBURY-Gainsborough (sch) CROSSWALKS (also at) AT WINSTON (sch) / KENILWORK / RIDGEWAY /SAN MARINO PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES (heavy) / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES, w/ NO TRUCKS OVER 8 TONS
15,100

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/13/2026
HCI
TRUCK TRAFFIC YES, w/ NO TRUCKS OVER 8 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER ** SIGNALIZED PED XING AT PALOMAR (activated during school arrival-release) 2 HR & 3 HR PKNG 9am-5pm (areas of) / 2 HR ANGLED PARKING (Winston to Ridgeway NO PARKING CITY STREETS 2am-5am

AREAS OF RED CURB & GREEN CURB / BUS STOPS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (few)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER WIDE LANDSCAPED MEDIAN w/CROSS-LANE WITHIN MEDIAN (at major intersections)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / BUSINESS / COMMERCIAL / SAN MARINO HS / CATHOLIC SCHOOL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Huntington wb 2026-22 *25 MPH WHEN CHILDREN PRESENT, SCHOOL ZONE
This section of Huntington Drive has 3 and 4 lanes of travel for the westbound direction. The adjacent land uses are residential non-fronting, heavy business, commercial dwellings with shops and restaurants, San Marino High School, and St Felicitas Catholic School. Field observations are the section from Winston Ave to Ridgeway Road there are angled parking (2 hr.), heavy pedestrian traffic at the business activity area. Also there are areas of red curb and green curb, and heavy pedestrian and bike traffic near the schools. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 43.7 mph which may suggest a 40 mph speed limit. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and bike users", which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of the segment, there are many restaurants and shops, high school, catholic school and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 40 mph speed limit be reduced to at 35 mph.

0.93 PAGE 221 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE SAN MARINO AVE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

WESTBOUND
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 1.5% 100.0%
X 1 1.5% 98.5%
X X 2 3.0% 97.0%
45 X X X X X 5 7.5% 94.0%
X X X X 4 6.0% 86.6%
X X X X X 5 7.5% 80.6%
X X X X X X X 7 10.4% 73.1%
X X X X X X 6 9.0% 62.7%
40 X X X X X X X 7 10.4% 53.7%
X X X X X X X X 8 11.9% 43.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 11.9% 31.3%
X X X 3 4.5% 19.4%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X 3 4.5% 19.4%
X X X X 4 6.0% 14.9%
35 X X X 3 4.5% 9.0%
X X 2 3.0% 4.5%
X 1 1.5% 1.5%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 67
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 85.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.0 %
File: Huntington wb 2026-22
PAGE 222 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

HUNTINGTON DRIVE SAN MARINO AVE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

WESTBOUND

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 98.5%
46 X 97.0%
45 X 94.0% }PACE
44 X 86.6% }PACE
43 X 80.6% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
42 X 73.1% }PACE
41 X 62.7% }PACE
40 X 53.7% }PACE
39 X 43.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
39 X 43.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 31.3% }PACE
37 X 19.4% }PACE
36 X 14.9% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
35 X 9.0%
34 X 4.5%
33 X 1.5%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 43.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 85.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 36.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.0 %
Huntington wb 2026-22
PAGE 223 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

KENILWORTH AVENUE LORAIN RD TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/16/2025 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:25 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF HUNTINGTON

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 28.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 21 - 30 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 97.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH (SB) / NOT POSTED (NB)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2026
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - LORAIN / SHERWOOD / MELVILLE / HUNTINGTON

CROSSWALKS AT ROANOKE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER ANGLED PARKING (at Huntington)
2 HR PARKING 9am-5pm

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP/DOWNHILL GRADE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "C" CURVE (n/o Melville)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density medium)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER NO CENTERLINE STRIPING
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F) / BUSINESS (at Huntington) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST NORTHBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Kenilworth 2026-23 The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 3.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed of 28.0 mph and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed sign is posted for the northbound direction.

0.41 PAGE 224 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

KENILWORTH AVENUE LORAIN RD TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:25 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X X 2 1.9% 99.1%
30 X X X X X 5 4.7% 97.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.5% 92.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10.3% 85.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 9.3% 74.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12.1% 65.4%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 14.0% 53.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 15.9% 39.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12.1% 23.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.5% 11.2%
X X X X 4 3.7% 3.7%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 107
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 2.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 97.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 0.0 %
File: Kenilworth 2026-23
PAGE 225 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

KENILWORTH AVENUE LORAIN RD TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:25 AM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 100.0%
32 X 100.0%
31 99.1%
30 X 97.2% }PACE
29 X 92.5% }PACE
28 X 85.0% }PACE
27 X 74.8% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
26 X 65.4% }PACE
25 X 53.3% }PACE
24 X 39.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
23 X 23.4% }PACE
22 X 11.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
21 X 3.7% }PACE
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 2.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 97.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 0.0 %
Kenilworth 2026-23
PAGE 226 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

KENILWORTH AVENUE HUNTINGTON DR TO SIERRA MADRE BLVD
DATE: 4/16/2025 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF CUMBERLAND

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 27.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 21 - 30 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 94.2 %

POSTED SPEED LIMIT NOT POSTED

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - HUNTINGTON / CUMBERLAND / RIDGEWAY / SIERRA MADRE 450

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2026
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - HUNTINGTON / CUMBERLAND / RIDGEWAY / SIERRA MADRE

CROSSWALKS AT CUMBERLAND

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCK OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP/DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density medium)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER NO CENTERLINE STRIPING
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F) / BUSINESS (at Huntington) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE POST & ESTABLISH
JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Kenilworth 2026-24 NP = NOT POSTED
Kenilworth Avenue is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are mainly residential with some commercial facing Huntington Drive. This section does not have a speed limit signs posted within the segment. The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 2.8 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. It is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be established and speed signs be installed for this roadway.

0.26 PAGE 227 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

KENILWORTH AVENUE HUNTINGTON DR TO SIERRA MADRE BLVD
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
X 1 1.0% 100.0%
X X 2 1.9% 99.0%
X X 2 1.9% 97.1%
30 X X X X 4 3.8% 95.2%
X X X X X 5 4.8% 91.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 9.6% 86.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 9.6% 76.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12.5% 67.3%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 14.4% 54.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 13.5% 40.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 13.5% 26.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.7% 13.5%
X X X X X 5 4.8% 5.8%
20 X 1 1.0% 1.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 104
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 94.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 1.0 %
File: Kenilworth 2026-24
PAGE 228 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

KENILWORTH AVENUE HUNTINGTON DR TO SIERRA MADRE BLVD
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:35 PM - 1:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 100.0%
32 X 99.0%
31 X 97.1%
30 X 95.2% }PACE
29 X 91.3% }PACE
28 X 86.5% }PACE
27 X 76.9% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
26 X 67.3% }PACE
25 X 54.8% }PACE
24 X 40.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
23 X 26.9% }PACE
22 X 13.5% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
21 X 5.8% }PACE
20 X 1.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 94.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 1.0 %
Kenilworth 2026-24
PAGE 229 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
LOMBARDY ROAD WEST CITY LIMIT (Allen) TO SIERRA MADRE BLVD DATE: 4/14/2026 & 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF CHESTER
DATE OF SURVEY 4/14/2026 & 4/21/2026
85th PERCENTILE 29.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 22 - 31 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 87.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH (EB) / NOT POSTED (WB)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
550

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
11:00-11:30 AM & 9:00-9:30 AM
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - SIERRA MADRE / CANTERBURY / SAN MARINO / ALLEN

CROSSWALKS AT SAN MARINO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME (WCL to Allen)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE w/SLIGHT "S" CURVE (near Allen)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at approaches)

WIDE ROADWAY

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST WESTBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Lombardy 2026-25
The recommended 25 mph is 4.9 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed mph and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed sign be posted for the westbound direction.

0.69 PAGE 230 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
LOMBARDY ROAD WEST CITY LIMIT (Allen) TO SIERRA MADRE BLVD DATE: 4/14/2026 & 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:00-11:30 AM & 9:00-9:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X X 2 1.7% 99.1%
X 1 0.9% 97.4%
X X X X X 5 4.3% 96.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.9% 92.2%
30 X X X X X X 6 5.2% 85.3%
X X X X X X X 7 6.0% 80.2%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.6% 74.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.2% 65.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.3% 54.3%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 12.9% 44.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.2% 31.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.6% 19.8%
X X X X X X X 7 6.0% 11.2%
X X X 3 2.6% 5.2%
20 X X X 3 2.6% 2.6%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 116
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 22 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 25.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.2 %
File: Lombardy 2026-25
PAGE 231 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
LOMBARDY ROAD WEST CITY LIMIT (Allen) TO SIERRA MADRE BLVD DATE: 4/14/2026 & 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:00-11:30 AM & 9:00-9:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 99.1%
33 X 97.4%
32 X 96.6%
31 X 92.2% }PACE
30 X 85.3% }PACE
29 X 80.2% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
28 X 74.1% }PACE
27 X 65.5% }PACE
26 X 54.3% }PACE
25 X 44.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
24 X 31.0% }PACE
23 X 19.8% }PACE
22 X 11.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
21 X 5.2%
20 X 2.6%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 22 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 25.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.2 %
Lombardy 2026-25
PAGE 232 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LOMBARDY ROAD SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 4/14/2026 & 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF SANTA ANITA
DATE OF SURVEY 4/14/2026 & 4/21/2026
85th PERCENTILE 29.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 22 - 31 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 83.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - SAN GABRIEL / SANTA ANITA / SIERRA MADRE (at intersection & median island)

CROSSWALKS AT SANTA ANITA / SIERRA MADRE
1,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
11:30-12:00 PM & 9:00-9:30 AM
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT SANTA ANITA / SIERRA MADRE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING CITY STREETS 2am-5am

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVE (Sierra Madre to Santa Anita) / DIP (at Santa Anita)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS POOR
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (medium)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at approaches) WIDE MEDIAN w/LANES (at Sierra Madre)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT - CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Lombardy 2026-26
This segment of Lombardy Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 36 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.43 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 27.5 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.43 PAGE 233 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LOMBARDY ROAD SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 4/14/2026 & 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:30-12:00 PM & 9:00-9:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X 1 0.9% 99.1%
X X X X 4 3.7% 98.1%
X X X X 4 3.7% 94.4%
X X X X X 5 4.7% 90.7%
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 8.4% 86.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 9.3% 77.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 9.3% 68.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.5% 58.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10.3% 51.4%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11.2% 41.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11.2% 29.9%
X X X X X X 6 5.6% 18.7%
X X X X X X 6 5.6% 13.1%
X X X X X 5 4.7% 7.5%
20 X X 2 1.9% 2.8%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 107
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 22 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 25.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.5 %
File: Lombardy 2026-26
PAGE 234 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LOMBARDY ROAD SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 4/14/2026 & 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:30-12:00 PM & 9:00-9:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 99.1%
33 X 98.1%
32 X 94.4%
31 X 90.7% }PACE
30 X 86.0% }PACE
29 X 77.6% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
28 X 68.2% }PACE
27 X 58.9% }PACE
26 X 51.4% }PACE
25 X 41.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
24 X 29.9% }PACE
23 X 18.7% }PACE
22 X 13.1% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
21 X 7.5%
20 X 2.8%
19 X 0.9%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 31 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 22 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 25.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.5 %
Lombardy 2026-26
PAGE 235 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LORAIN ROAD SHERWOOD RD TO VIRGINIA RD
DATE: 4/15/2026 & 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF WINDSOR
DATE OF SURVEY 4/15/2026 & 4/21/2026
85th PERCENTILE 32.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 26 - 35 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 89.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - VIRGINIA / ST. ALBANS / SHERWOOD CROSSWALKS AT VIRGINIA (sch) / ST. ALBANS
1,500

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
10:15-11:00 AM & 8:00-8:50 AM
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT VIRGINIA (sch) / ST. ALBANS

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "C" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE / SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS "RESIDENCE DISTRICT" CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Lorain 2026-27
This segment of Lorain Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 65 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.54 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 34.6 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph be reduced to 25 mph. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.54 PAGE 236 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LORAIN ROAD SHERWOOD RD TO VIRGINIA RD
DATE: 4/15/2026 & 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 10:15-11:00 AM & 8:00-8:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X 2 1.9% 98.1%
X X X X 4 3.7% 96.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10.3% 92.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12.1% 82.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 14.0% 70.1%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 16.8% 56.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12.1% 39.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.4% 27.1%
X X X X X X 6 5.6% 18.7%
X X X X X 5 4.7% 13.1%
25 X X 2 1.9% 8.4%
X X X X 4 3.7% 6.5%
X X X 3 2.8% 2.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X ##### 0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 107
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 26 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 89.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.4 %
File: Lorain 2026-27
PAGE 237 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LORAIN ROAD SHERWOOD RD TO VIRGINIA RD
DATE: 4/15/2026 & 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 10:15-11:00 AM & 8:00-8:50 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 98.1% }PACE
34 X 96.3% }PACE
33 X 92.5% }PACE
32 X 82.2% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
31 X 70.1% }PACE
30 X 56.1% }PACE
29 X 39.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
28 X 27.1% }PACE
27 X 18.7% }PACE
26 X 13.1% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
25 X 8.4%
24 X 6.5%
23 X 2.8%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 26 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 89.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.4 %
Lorain 2026-27
PAGE 238 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LORAIN ROAD VIRGINIA RD TO SAN MARINO AVE
DATE: 4/15/2025 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 9:45 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF WEST

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 34.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 27 - 36 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 87.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - SAN MARINO / MISSION-WEST / VIRGINIA CROSSWALKS AT SAN MARINO / MISSION-WEST / VIRGINIA (sch) 5,750

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/15/2026
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT SAN MARINO / MISSION-WEST / VIRGINIA (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER WATCH CHILDREN SIGN

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "C" CURVE (at Virginia)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD
ROAD CONDITIONS FAIR (cracks)
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SINGLE DASHED & SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS "RESIDENCE DISTRICT" CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Lorain 2026-28
This segment of Lorain Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 81 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.59 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 37.8 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph be reduced to 25 mph. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.59 PAGE 239 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LORAIN ROAD VIRGINIA RD TO SAN MARINO AVE
DATE: 4/15/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 9:45 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.2% 90.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.5% 81.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.6% 76.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 11.7% 67.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 12.3% 55.8%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 13.5% 43.6% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 9.8% 30.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.7% 20.2%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.9% 13.5%
X X X X X X 6 3.7% 8.6%
25 X X X X X 5 3.1% 4.9%
X X X 3 1.8% 1.8%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 163
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 27 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 30.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.6 %
File: Lorain 2026-28
PAGE 240 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LORAIN ROAD VIRGINIA RD TO SAN MARINO AVE
DATE: 4/15/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 9:45 AM - 10:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 99.4%
HCI
37 X 96.9%
36 X 95.7% }PACE
35 X 90.8% }PACE
34 X 81.6% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
33 X 76.1% }PACE
32 X 67.5% }PACE
31 X 55.8% }PACE
30 X 43.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
29 X 30.1% }PACE
28 X 20.2% }PACE
27 X 13.5% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
26 X 8.6%
25 X 4.9%
24 X 1.8%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 27 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 30.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.6 %
Lorain 2026-28
PAGE 241 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LORAIN ROAD SAN MARINO AVE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 4/15/2025 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 9:00 AM - 9:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH-EAST OF RIDGEWAY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 33.3 MPH
10 MPH PACE 26 - 35 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 87.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - SAN GABRIEL / DUARTE-MELVILLE / DEL MAR / SAN MARINO CROSSWALKS AT BELHAVEN (sch) / DEL MAR / SAN MARINO / DEL MAR (faded) 3,900

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/15/2026
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT BELHAVEN (sch) / DEL MAR / SAN MARINO / DEL MAR (faded)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO STOPPING CITY STREETS 2am-5am

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE w/SLIGHT CURVE (near San Gabriel)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW (at approaches) / SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINES

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS "RESIDENCE DISTRICT" CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Lorain 2026-29
This segment of Lorain Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 105 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.92 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 58.9 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph be reduced to 25 mph. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.92 PAGE 242 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LORAIN ROAD SAN MARINO AVE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 4/15/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 9:00 AM - 9:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
0 0.0% 99.3%
40 X X X 3 2.2% 99.3%
X 1 0.7% 97.0%
X X X 3 2.2% 96.3%
0 0.0% 94.0%
X X X 3 2.2% 94.0%
35 X X X 3 2.2% 91.8%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X 3 2.2% 91.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.7% 89.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.2% 82.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.4% 71.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.2% 61.2%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 17.2% 50.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.7% 32.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.4% 23.1%
X X X X X X 6 4.5% 12.7%
X X X X X 5 3.7% 8.2%
25 X X 2 1.5% 4.5%
X X 2 1.5% 3.0%
0 0.0% 1.5%
0 0.0% 1.5%
X X 2 1.5% 1.5%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 134
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 26 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 30.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.5 %
File: Lorain 2026-29
PAGE 243 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LORAIN ROAD SAN MARINO AVE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 4/15/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 9:00 AM - 9:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 99.3%
40 X 99.3%
39 X 97.0%
38 X 96.3%
HCI
37 X 94.0%
36 X 94.0%
35 X 91.8% }PACE
34 X 89.6% }PACE
33 X 82.8% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
32 X 71.6% }PACE
31 X 61.2% }PACE
30 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
29 X 32.8% }PACE
28 X 23.1% }PACE
27 X 12.7% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
26 X 8.2% }PACE
25 X 4.5%
24 X 3.0%
23 X 1.5%
22 X 1.5%
21 X 1.5%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 26 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.3 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 30.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.5 %
Lorain 2026-29
PAGE 244 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LOS ROBLES AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO MONTEREY RD
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:30 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY MID-WAY NORTH OF MONTEREY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 31.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 25 - 34 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 93.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

ELECTRONIC SPEED FEED BACK SIGN

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.51
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.08
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.17
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 20 4.00 1.69

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - MONTEREY / MISSION, STOP - MARENGO (NCL)

CROSSWALKS AT MONTEREY / MISSION

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
14,700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/2/2026
HCI

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING CITY STREETS 2am-5am

SPEED FEEDBACK SIGN, RESIDENTIAL AREA SLOW DOWN

AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density medium-heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER PAINTED MEDIAN / SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE / 2 WAY LEFT TURN LANE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "SAFETY CORRIDOR" CVC 22358.7(a)(1) JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Los Robles 2026-30 This section of Los Robles Avenue is two lane arterial roadway. The adjacent land use is solely residential. The speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of 31.7 mph which may suggest a 30 mph speed limit. A review of the collision history revealed that this segment had 6 collisions that were speed related, and 1 collision involved serious injuries, and 2 collision involved a pedestrian, which ranked it as one of the top locations in the City that involved fatality and/or serious injury collisions.

0.44 PAGE 245 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LOS ROBLES AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO MONTEREY RD
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:30 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X 1 0.7% 97.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.5% 97.2%
X X X X X X 6 4.1% 91.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.3% 87.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 13.8% 79.3%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 13.8% 65.5% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 15.2% 51.7% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 29 20.0% 36.6% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.7% 16.6%
X X X 3 2.1% 6.9%
25 X X 2 1.4% 4.8%
X X X X 4 2.8% 3.4%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 145
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 2.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 93.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.4 %
File: Los Robles 2026-30
PAGE 246 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LOS ROBLES AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO MONTEREY RD
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:30 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 99.3%
36 X 98.6%
35 X 97.9%
34 X 97.2% }PACE
33 X 91.7% }PACE
32 X 87.6% }PACE
31 X 79.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
30 X 65.5% }PACE
29 X 51.7% }PACE
28 X 36.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
27 X 16.6% }PACE
26 X 6.9% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
25 X 4.8% }PACE
24 X 3.4%
23 X 0.7%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 2.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 93.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.4 %
Los Robles 2026-30
PAGE 247 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LOS ROBLES AVENUE MONTEREY RD TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF PLYMOUTH

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 32.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 26 - 35 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 91.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 7 1.40 0.67
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 24 4.80 2.30

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - MONTEREY / WILSON / HUNTINGTON, STOP - WINTHROP / ASHBORNE

CROSSWALKS AT MONTEREY / WISLON / HUNTINGTON
13,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/2/2026
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT MONTEREY / WISLON / HUNTINGTON

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER YELLOW FLASHING BEACON AT WINTHROP / ASHBORNE / PILGRIM

DO NOT PASS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "C" CURVE (at Wilson) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (at Wilson)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF) / COMMERCIAL (a Huntington) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Los Robles 2026-31 This portion of Los Robles Avenue has one lane of travel per direction. The adjacent land uses are mainly residential and commercial at Huntington Drive. The E & T Study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 32.7 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 26 to 35 mph. In an effort to keep consistency with speed of the adjacent northerly segment, it is recommended that the existing 30 mph be reduced to 25 mph.

0.44 PAGE 248 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LOS ROBLES AVENUE MONTEREY RD TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X 8 4.8% 98.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.1% 93.5%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.8% 86.3%
X X X X 4 2.4% 81.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.3% 79.2%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 26 15.5% 70.8% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 13.7% 55.4% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 27 16.1% 41.7% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 11.3% 25.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.7% 14.3%
25 X X X X X X X X 8 4.8% 6.5%
X 1 0.6% 1.8%
X X 2 1.2% 1.2%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 168
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 26 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 91.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.5 %
File: Los Robles 2026-31
PAGE 249 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

LOS ROBLES AVENUE MONTEREY RD TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 99.4%
HCI
37 X 98.8%
36 X 98.2%
35 X 98.2% }PACE
34 X 93.5% }PACE
33 X 86.3% }PACE
32 X 81.5% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
31 X 79.2% }PACE
30 X 70.8% }PACE
29 X 55.4% }PACE
28 X 41.7% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
27 X 25.6% }PACE
26 X 14.3% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
25 X 6.5%
24 X 1.8%
23 X 1.2%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 26 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 91.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.5 %
Los Robles 2026-31
PAGE 250 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
MILL LANE ST. ALBANS RD TO VIRGINIA RD
DATE: 4/15/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 1:15 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY MID-BLOCK WEST VIRGINIA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 28.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 21 - 30 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 85.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 PMH (WB) / NOT POSTED (EB)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
3,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/15/2026
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - VIRGINIA

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE MODERATE-SWEEPING "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density few)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF) / SAN MARINO TENNIS CENTER RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - POST EASTBOUND
JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Mill 2026-32
The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 3.6 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed of 28.6 mph and meets CVC standards. For enforcement, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed sign be posted for the eastbound direction.

0.10 PAGE 251 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
MILL LANE ST. ALBANS RD TO VIRGINIA RD
DATE: 4/15/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 1:15 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 0 0.0% 99.3%
X 1 0.7% 99.3%
X X X X 4 2.7% 98.7%
X X 2 1.3% 96.0%
X X X X 4 2.7% 94.6%
30 X X X X X X 6 4.0% 91.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 87.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 81.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 74.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 14.8% 65.8% 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.7% 51.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 11.4% 40.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.0% 28.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.1% 22.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.0% 12.8%
20 X X X X X 5 3.4% 6.7%
X 1 0.7% 3.4%
X X X 3 2.0% 2.7%
0 0.0% 0.7%
0 0.0% 0.7%
15 X 1 0.7% 0.7%
TOTAL VEHICLES 149
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 85.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.7 %
File: Mill 2026-32
PAGE 252 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
MILL LANE ST. ALBANS RD TO VIRGINIA RD
DATE: 4/15/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 1:15 PM - 2:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 99.3%
35 X 99.3%
34 X 99.3%
33 X 98.7%
32 X 96.0%
31 X 94.6%
30 X 91.9% }PACE
29 X 87.9% }PACE
28 X 81.2% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
27 X 74.5% }PACE
26 X 65.8% }PACE
25 X 51.0% }PACE
24 X 40.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
23 X 28.9% }PACE
22 X 22.8% }PACE
21 X 12.8% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
20 X 6.7%
19 X 3.4%
18 X 2.7%
17 X 0.7%
16 X 0.7%
15 X 0.7%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 85.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.7 %
Mill 2026-32
PAGE 253 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

MISSION STREET WEST CITY LIMIT TO EL MOLINO AVE
DATE: 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF EUCLID

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 21.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 16 - 25 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 97.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH (EB) / NOT POSTED (WB)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LOS ROBLES, STOP - EUCLID / EL MOLINO

CROSSWALKS AT LOS ROBLES / EUCLID / EL MOLINO
7,550

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/27/2026
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT LOS ROBLES / EUCLID / EL MOLINO
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES (many) / YES (many)
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES (ANGLED-WB)
OTHER 2 HR PARKING 9am-5pm
"NO RIDING BICYCLES or WHEELED TOYS ON SIDEWALK" SIGN

AREAS OF RED CURB / AREAS OF YELLOW CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT "C" CURVE (at Las Flores)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / NO

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE BUSINESS / BOUTIQUES / RESTUARANTS
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 20 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE
JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Mission 2026-33
This section of Mission Street is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land use is a business area with restaurants, hair salon, and small stores/shops. Field observations include the areas has a downtown feel with dense small business dwellings, heavy pedestrian traffic, and many on-street and angled parking. With the speed survey resulting with an 85th percentile speed of 21.8 mph, it is recommended that the existing 25 mph be reduce to 20 mph speed limit.

0.26 PAGE 254 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

MISSION STREET WEST CITY LIMIT TO EL MOLINO AVE
DATE: 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
30 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X 1 0.9% 99.1%
25 X X 2 1.8% 98.2%
X X X 3 2.7% 96.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.5% 93.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.7% 88.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 15.5% 75.5%
20 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 13.6% 60.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 13.6% 46.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 14.5% 32.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.8% 18.2%
X X X X X X 6 5.5% 6.4%
15 X 1 0.9% 0.9%
TOTAL VEHICLES 110
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 16 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 1.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 19.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 97.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 16.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 0.9 %
File: Mission 2026-33
PAGE 255 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

MISSION STREET WEST CITY LIMIT TO EL MOLINO AVE
DATE: 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:00 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 100.0%
32 X 100.0%
31 100.0%
30 X 100.0%
29 X 100.0%
28 X 100.0%
27 X 100.0%
26 X 99.1%
25 X 98.2% }PACE
24 X 96.4% }PACE
23 X 93.6% }PACE
22 X 88.2% }PACE
21 X 75.5% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
20 X 60.0% }PACE
19 X 46.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
18 X 32.7% }PACE
17 X 18.2% }PACE
16 X 6.4% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
15 X 0.9%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 16 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 1.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 19.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 97.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 16.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 0.9 %
Mission 2026-33
PAGE 256 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
MONTEREY ROAD GARFIELD AVE TO ST. ALBANS RD
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF VERONDA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 34.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 26 - 35 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 88.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 2 0.40 0.16
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 1 0.20 0.08
TOTAL COLLISIONS 16 3.20 1.29

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - LOS ROBLES, STOP - GARFIELD / EL MOLINO / OAK KNOLL / OLD MILL CROSSWALKS AT LOS ROBLES, STOP - GARFIELD / EL MOLINO (sch) / VERONDA / OAK KNOLL

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
6,750

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/2/2026
HCI

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME (Oak Knoll to Old Mill)
NO PARKING CITY STREETS 2am-5am
NO TURN ON RED (at Los Robles) / AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL-MODERATE UP/DOWNHILL GRADES HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "C" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density many)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE / SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE
NARROW ROADWAY (Oak Knoll to Old Mill)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF) / SOUTHWESTERN ACADEMY SCHOOL RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Monterey 2026-34
This segment of Monterey Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 91 dwelling houses fronting the street over 1.01 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 64.6 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph be reduced to 25 mph. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

1.01 PAGE 257 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
MONTEREY ROAD GARFIELD AVE TO ST. ALBANS RD
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
0 0.0% 98.7%
40 X 1 0.6% 98.7%
X X 2 1.3% 98.1%
X X X 3 1.9% 96.8%
X X 2 1.3% 94.9%
X X X X X X 6 3.8% 93.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.2% 89.8%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.2% 89.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.6% 79.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 9.6% 72.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.4% 62.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.9% 56.1%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 14.6% 47.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 26 16.6% 32.5% X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.4% 15.9%
X X X X X X 6 3.8% 9.6%
X X X X X X X 7 4.5% 5.7%
25 X X 2 1.3% 1.3%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 157
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 26 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 30.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 88.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 1.3 %
File: Monterey 2026-34
PAGE 258 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
MONTEREY ROAD GARFIELD AVE TO ST. ALBANS RD
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 99.4%
41 X 98.7%
40 X 98.7%
39 X 98.1%
38 X 96.8%
HCI
37 X 94.9%
36 X 93.6%
35 X 89.8% }PACE
34 X 79.6% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
33 X 72.0% }PACE
32 X 62.4% }PACE
31 X 56.1% }PACE
30 X 47.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
29 X 32.5% }PACE
28 X 15.9% }PACE
27 X 9.6% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
26 X 5.7% }PACE
25 X 1.3%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 26 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 30.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 88.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 1.3 %
Monterey 2026-34
PAGE 259 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
MONTEREY ROAD ST. ALBANS RD TO VIRGINIA ROAD
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SHENANDOAH

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 38.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 80.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - OLD MILL / ST.ALBANS / VIRGINIA CROSSWALKS AT OLD MILL / ST.ALBANS / VIRGINIA
6,150

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/2/2026
HCI

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE w/GRADUAL "C" CURVE (Oak Knoll to Ramiro) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (slight at curve)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at approaches)

WIDE ROADWAY

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Monterey 2026-35
This segment of Monterey Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 18 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.27 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 17.3 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 35 mph be reduced to 25 mph. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.27 PAGE 260 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
MONTEREY ROAD ST. ALBANS RD TO VIRGINIA ROAD
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.5% 100.0%
45 X X 2 1.0% 99.5%
X 1 0.5% 98.5%
X X X 3 1.5% 98.0%
X X X X X X 6 3.0% 96.5%
X X X X X 5 2.5% 93.5%
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.5% 91.0%
X X X 3 1.5% 85.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.0% 84.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.5% 79.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 25 12.4% 71.6% 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 10.0% 59.2%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 10.0% 59.2% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 10.0% 49.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 25 12.4% 39.3% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7.5% 26.9%
X X X X X X 6 3.0% 19.4%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.0% 16.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.0% 10.4%
X X X 3 1.5% 3.5%
X 1 0.5% 2.0%
X X X 3 1.5% 1.5%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 201
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.5 %
File: Monterey 2026-35
PAGE 261 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
MONTEREY ROAD ST. ALBANS RD TO VIRGINIA ROAD
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 10:30 AM - 11:15 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 99.5%
44 X 98.5%
43 X 98.0%
42 X 96.5%
41 X 93.5%
40 X 91.0%
39 X 85.6%
38 X 84.1% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
HCI
38 X 84.1% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
37 X 79.1% }PACE
36 X 71.6% }PACE
35 X 59.2% }PACE
34 X 49.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 39.3% }PACE
32 X 26.9% }PACE
31 X 19.4% }PACE
30 X 16.4% }PACE
29 X 10.4% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
28 X 3.5%
27 X 2.0%
26 X 1.5%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 38.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 80.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.5 %
Monterey 2026-35
PAGE 262 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

MONTEREY ROAD VIRGINIA RD TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:15 AM - 11:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF BEDFORD

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 37.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 87.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 2 0.40 0.31
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 8 1.60 1.25

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - VIRGINIA / CAMBRIDGE / HUNTINGTON

CROSSWALKS AT VIRGINIA / CAMBRIDGE / HUNTINGTON
4,950

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/2/2026
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT VIRGINIA / CAMBRIDGE / HUNTINGTON

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP/DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE "C" CURVE (at Westhaven to Huntington) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE ( Westhaven to Huntington)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density medium)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at approaches)

WIDE ROADWAY
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF) / COMMERCIAL (at Huntington) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - PREVENT 10 MPH JUMP
JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Monterey 2026-36
This portion of Monterey Road is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential and commercial/business activity at Huntington Drive. The speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of 37.0 mph and a 10 mph pace range of 29 to 38 mph, which may suggest a 35 mph speed limit. To prevent a 10 mph jump in speed limit from the westerly adjacent segment with a 25 mph speed limit, it is recommended the existing 35 mph be reduced to 30 mph.

0.71 PAGE 263 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

MONTEREY ROAD VIRGINIA RD TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:15 AM - 11:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
X X X 3 1.7% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 98.3%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 97.8%
X X X 3 1.7% 94.4%
40 X 1 0.6% 92.7%
X 1 0.6% 92.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.7% 91.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.1% 84.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.4% 74.9%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 33 18.4% 66.5%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 33 18.4% 66.5% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 27 15.1% 48.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.5% 33.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 5.6% 23.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.7% 17.9%
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 5.0% 11.2%
X X X X 4 2.2% 6.1%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 3.9%
0 0.0% 0.6%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 179
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.9 %
File: Monterey 2026-36
PAGE 264 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

MONTEREY ROAD VIRGINIA RD TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/2/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:15 AM - 11:45 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 98.3%
42 X 97.8%
41 X 94.4%
40 X 92.7%
39 X 92.2%
38 X 91.6% }PACE
HCI
37 X 84.9% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
36 X 74.9% }PACE
35 X 66.5% }PACE
34 X 48.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
33 X 33.0% }PACE
32 X 23.5% }PACE
31 X 17.9% }PACE
30 X 11.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
29 X 6.1% }PACE
28 X 3.9%
27 X 0.6%
26 X 0.6%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 37.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 34.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 87.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.9 %
Monterey 2026-36
PAGE 265 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

OAK GROVE AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO CIRCLE DR
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:40 PM - 2:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF CIRCLE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 26.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 20 - 29 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 95.3 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
15 MPH (Advisory speed at curves)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - ROSALIND
4,100

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2026
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - ROSALIND

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES (SB)

OTHER AREAS OF NO PARKING ANYTIME (NB)
NO PARKING CITY STREETS 2am-5am

PEDS WALK IN STREET

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "C" CURVE (Oak Ln to Circle Dr) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE ( several areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / YES (density light)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED / SOLID DBL YELLOW (at approaches)

NO SHOULDERS

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Oak Grove 2026-37
The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 1.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed of 26.0 mph and meets CVC standards.

0.53 PAGE 266 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

OAK GROVE AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO CIRCLE DR
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:40 PM - 2:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
30 X X X 3 2.8% 100.0%
X X X X 4 3.8% 97.2%
X X X 3 2.8% 93.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.7% 90.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 9.4% 84.9%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 14.2% 75.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 17.0% 61.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 14.2% 44.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 14.2% 30.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.5% 16.0%
20 X X X X X X 6 5.7% 7.5%
X X 2 1.9% 1.9%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 106
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 20 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 2.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 95.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 1.9 %
File: Oak Grove 2026-37
PAGE 267 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

OAK GROVE AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO CIRCLE DR
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:40 PM - 2:40 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 100.0%
32 X 100.0%
31 100.0%
30 X 100.0%
29 X 97.2% }PACE
28 X 93.4% }PACE
27 X 90.6% }PACE
26 X 84.9% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
25 X 75.5% }PACE
24 X 61.3% }PACE
23 X 44.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
22 X 30.2% }PACE
21 X 16.0% }PACE
20 X 7.5% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
19 X 1.9%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 20 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 2.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 95.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.9 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 1.9 %
Oak Grove 2026-37
PAGE 268 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

OAK GROVE AVENUE CIRCLE DR TO ROSALIND RD
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF OAK VIEW
DATE OF SURVEY 4/16/2026
85th PERCENTILE 27.4 MPH
10 MPH PACE 20 - 29 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 89.6 %

POSTED SPEED LIMIT NOT POSTED
20 MPH ADVISORY (curve speed at Oak View)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 1.34
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 2.69

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - SHENANDOAH / ROSALIND

CROSSWALKS NONE
600

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
2:45 - 3:45 PM & 4:40 - 5:10 PM
HCI

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FEW / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (few)

OTHER AREAS OF NO PARKING ANYTIME / WATCH FOR CHILDREN

AREAS OF RED CURB / AREAS OF NO PARKING ANYTIME

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL TO WINDING "S" CURVES ( continuous) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / YES (many)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER RAISED DOTS (areas of) / MOSTLY NO ROADWAY STRIPING

VERY NARROW ROADWAY

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE POST & ESTABLISH - "RESIDENCE DISTRICT" CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Oak Grove 2026-38
This segment of Oak Grove Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 44 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.68 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 43.5 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.68 PAGE 269 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

OAK GROVE AVENUE CIRCLE DR TO ROSALIND RD
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:45 - 3:45 PM & 4:40 - 5:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.9% 100.0%
X X 2 1.7% 99.1%
30 X X X 3 2.6% 97.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.2% 94.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 89.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.7% 81.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.7% 73.0%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.2% 64.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 13.0% 52.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.2% 39.1%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 27.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.8% 19.1%
20 X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 11.3%
X X X 3 2.6% 5.2%
X X X 3 2.6% 2.6%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 115
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 20 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 5.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 89.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.2 %
File: Oak Grove 2026-38
PAGE 270 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

OAK GROVE AVENUE CIRCLE DR TO ROSALIND RD
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:45 - 3:45 PM & 4:40 - 5:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 100.0%
32 X 100.0%
31 99.1%
30 X 97.4%
29 X 94.8% }PACE
28 X 89.6% }PACE
27 X 81.7% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
26 X 73.0% }PACE
25 X 64.3% }PACE
24 X 52.2% }PACE
23 X 39.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
22 X 27.0% }PACE
21 X 19.1% }PACE
20 X 11.3% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
19 X 5.2%
18 X 2.6%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 20 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.4 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 5.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 89.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 20.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.2 %
Oak Grove 2026-38
PAGE 271 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

OAK KNOLL AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF COURTLAND

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 34.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 27 - 36 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 81.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 4 0.80 0.63
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.16
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 4 0.80 0.63

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HUNTINGTON, STOP- MONTEREY (thru lane), YIELD - MONTEREY (right turn lane) CROSSWALKS AT HUNTINGTON / MONTEREY (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
8,250

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/27/2026
HCI

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING NO

OTHER SPECIAL TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT AREA

AREAS OF RED CURB
NO PARKING CITY STREET 2am-5am

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE / SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE

NARROW ROADWAY

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F = FRONTING File: Oak Knoll 2026-39
NCL IS 225 FT N/O MONTEREY
This segment of Oak Knoll Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 30 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.42 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 26.9 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph be reduced to 25 mph. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.42 PAGE 272 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

OAK KNOLL AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X 7 5.4% 85.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.9% 80.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.2% 73.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.0% 63.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.9% 53.8%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.0% 46.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.5% 36.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 25.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.5% 16.9%
X X X X X 5 3.8% 8.5%
25 X X X 3 2.3% 4.6%
X 1 0.8% 2.3%
X X 2 1.5% 1.5%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 130
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 27 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 30.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.5 %
File: Oak Knoll 2026-39
PAGE 273 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

OAK KNOLL AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 11:35 AM - 12:05 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 99.2%
HCI
37 X 93.1%
36 X 90.0% }PACE
35 X 85.4% }PACE
34 X 80.0% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
33 X 73.1% }PACE
32 X 63.8% }PACE
31 X 53.8% }PACE
30 X 46.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
29 X 36.9% }PACE
28 X 25.4% }PACE
27 X 16.9% }PACE
26 X 8.5% - - - - - -15PCT
25 X 4.6%
24 X 2.3%
23 X 1.5%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 27 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 10.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 30.4 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.8 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 8.5 %
Oak Knoll 2026-39
PAGE 274 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

OAKWOOD DRIVE SAN MARINO AVE TO SIERRA MADRE BLVD
DATE: 4/21/2026 & 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF MONTECITO
DATE OF SURVEY 4/21/2026 & 4/27/2026
85th PERCENTILE 27.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 20 - 29 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 92.7 %

POSTED SPEED LIMIT NOT POSTED

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - SIERRA MADRE
100

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
2:30-3:30 & 1:30-2:00 & 4:20-5:15
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - SIERRA MADRE

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (medium)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER NO ROADWAY STRIPING

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE POST & ESTABLISH
JUSTIFICATION:

F = FRONTING File: Oakwood 2026-40
Oakwood Drive is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential. This section does not have a speed limit signs posted within the segment. The recommended 25 mph speed limit is 2.0 mph below the newly measured 85th percentile speed and meets CVC standards. It is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be established and speed signs be installed for this roadway.

0.19 PAGE 275 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

OAKWOOD DRIVE SAN MARINO AVE TO SIERRA MADRE BLVD
DATE: 4/21/2026 & 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:30-3:30 & 1:30-2:00 & 4:20-5:15 CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
30 X X X X 4 3.7% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.8% 96.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.3% 93.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.8% 85.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 16.5% 72.5%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 15.6% 56.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.9% 40.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 8.3% 28.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.3% 20.2%
X X X X X 5 4.6% 12.8%
20 X X X X X 5 4.6% 8.3%
X X X 3 2.8% 3.7%
X 1 0.9% 0.9%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 109
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 20 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 92.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.7 %
File: Oakwood 2026-40
PAGE 276 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

OAKWOOD DRIVE SAN MARINO AVE TO SIERRA MADRE BLVD
DATE: 4/21/2026 & 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:30-3:30 & 1:30-2:00 & 4:20-5:15 CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 100.0%
32 X 100.0%
31 100.0%
30 X 100.0%
29 X 96.3% }PACE
28 X 93.6% }PACE
27 X 85.3% }PACE
26 X 72.5% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
25 X 56.0% }PACE
24 X 40.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
23 X 28.4% }PACE
22 X 20.2% }PACE
21 X 12.8% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
20 X 8.3% }PACE
19 X 3.7%
18 X 0.9%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 20 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.4 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 92.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.7 %
Oakwood 2026-40
PAGE 277 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

ORLANDO ROAD CAMERON DR TO CHESTER AVE
DATE: 4/14/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF OXFORD

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 34.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 28 - 37 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 84.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.31
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 4 0.80 1.23

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - ALLEN / SAN MARINO / CHESTER

CROSSWALKS AT AVONDALE / ALLEN / SAN MARINO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS
1,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/14/2026
HCI
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER PEDS WALK IN STREET DURING EVENTS

HEAVY PARKING DURING EVENTS AT THE HUNTINGTON'S GARDENS,LIBRARY,MUSEUM NO STOPPING ANYTIME (areas of)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP/DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES & MODERATE "C" (e/o Avondale) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (several areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / YES (WB) - NO / FEW (EB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW & SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINES

AREAS OF NO ROADWAY STRIPING

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F) / THE HUNTINGTON'S LIBRARY, GARDENS, ART MUSEUM RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

F = FRONTING File: Orlando 2026-41
This portion of Orlando Road is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land uses include residential with direct driveways on the northside of road, and the majority of the south-side is The Huntington's with a gallery, library, museum, lily pond and more. During events at The Huntington's facilities this area is used for over flow on-street parking, pedestrian traffic can be very heavy, and with no sidewalk on the south-side of the street pedestrians and bicyclists use the main roadway. The roadway has slight to gradual horizontal/vertical curves, and areas of limited sight distance. The speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of 34.9 mph which may suggest a 30 mph speed limit. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and bike users, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the majority of the segment, there is The Huntington's, and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph.

0.99 PAGE 278 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

ORLANDO ROAD CAMERON DR TO CHESTER AVE
DATE: 4/14/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.5% 100.0%
40 X X X 3 2.3% 98.5%
X X 2 1.5% 96.2%
X 1 0.8% 94.7%
X X X X X 5 3.8% 93.9%
X X X X X 5 3.8% 90.2%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 12.9% 86.4%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 12.9% 86.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 12.1% 73.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 11.4% 61.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9.1% 50.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.6% 40.9%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.6% 30.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.1% 19.7%
X X X X X X 6 4.5% 13.6%
X X X X X 5 3.8% 9.1%
X X X X X 5 3.8% 5.3%
25 X X 2 1.5% 1.5%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 132
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 84.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.1 %
File: Orlando 2026-41
PAGE 279 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

ORLANDO ROAD CAMERON DR TO CHESTER AVE
DATE: 4/14/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 98.5%
39 X 96.2%
38 X 94.7%
HCI
37 X 93.9% }PACE
36 X 90.2% }PACE
35 X 86.4% }PACE
34 X 73.5% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
33 X 61.4% }PACE
32 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
31 X 40.9% }PACE
30 X 30.3% }PACE
29 X 19.7% }PACE
28 X 13.6% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
27 X 9.1%
26 X 5.3%
25 X 1.5%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 37 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 28 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 13.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 84.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.1 %
Orlando 2026-41
PAGE 280 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

OXFORD ROAD ORLANDO RD TO MONTEREY RD
DATE: 4/14/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF STRATFORD

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 34.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 26 - 35 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 88.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - MONTEREY / EUSTON / STRATFORD / ORLANDO

CROSSWALKS AT MONTEREY / EUSTON / STRATFORD

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS
3,950

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/14/2026
HCI
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER HEAVY ON-STREET PARKING DURING EVENTS AT GARDENS

SLOW CHILDREN AT PLAY SIGNS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES (Euston to Huntington)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (NB) - NO / ONE (SB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINES / AREAS OF NO ROADWAY STRIPING

PEDESTRIANS AND BIKES USE STREET DUE TO NO SIDEWALKS (SB) ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F) / HUNTINGTON LIBRARY and GARDENS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - "HIGH PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

F = FRONTING File: Oxford 2026-42
This portion of Oxford Road is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land uses include 100% residential with direct driveways on the east-side of road, and the majority of the west-side is The Huntington's with a gallery, library, museum, lily pond and more. During events at The Huntington's facilities this area is used for over flow on-street parking, pedestrian traffic can be very heavy, and with no sidewalk on the west-side of the street pedestrians and bicyclists use the main roadway. The speed study results show an 85th percentile speed of 34.0 mph which may suggest a 30 mph speed limit. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and bike users, which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the majority of the segment, there is The Huntington's, and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph.

0.73 PAGE 281 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

OXFORD ROAD ORLANDO RD TO MONTEREY RD
DATE: 4/14/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
X 1 0.7% 100.0%
X 1 0.7% 99.3%
0 0.0% 98.7%
40 0 0.0% 98.7%
X X 2 1.3% 98.7%
X X X 3 2.0% 97.3%
X X X 3 2.0% 95.3%
X X 2 1.3% 93.3%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.3% 92.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.3% 92.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.7% 84.7%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.7% 74.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.3% 67.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8.7% 58.0%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 29 19.3% 49.3% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 12.7% 30.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.3% 17.3%
X X X X X 5 3.3% 10.0%
X X X X 4 2.7% 6.7%
25 X X X X X 5 3.3% 4.0%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 150
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 26 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 30.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 88.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.0 %
File: Oxford 2026-42
PAGE 282 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

OXFORD ROAD ORLANDO RD TO MONTEREY RD
DATE: 4/14/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 1:00 PM - 1:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 99.3%
41 X 98.7%
40 X 98.7%
39 X 98.7%
38 X 97.3%
HCI
37 X 95.3%
36 X 93.3%
35 X 92.0% }PACE
34 X 84.7% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
33 X 74.0% }PACE
32 X 67.3% }PACE
31 X 58.0% }PACE
30 X 49.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
29 X 30.0% }PACE
28 X 17.3% }PACE
27 X 10.0% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
26 X 6.7% }PACE
25 X 4.0%
24 X 0.7%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 35 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 26 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 30.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 88.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.0 %
Oxford 2026-42
PAGE 283 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

RIDGEWAY ROAD HUNTINGTON DR TO LORAIN RD
DATE: 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF MELVILLE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 27.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 21 - 30 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 94.3 %

POSTED SPEED LIMIT NOT POSTED

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 2.90
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 5.80

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - HUNTINGTON / ROANOKE / MELVILLE / ADAIR / LORAIN 450

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/21/2026
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - HUNTINGTON / ROANOKE / MELVILLE / ADAIR / LORAIN

CROSSWALKS AT HUNTINGTON / ROANOKE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER 2 HR PARKING (at business) / ANGLED PARKING (NB at business) GREEN CURB (at business)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF) / COMMERCIAL-BUSINESS RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE POST & ESTABLISH
JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Ridgeway 2026-43
This portion of Ridgeway Road is a two lane roadway. The adjacent land uses are residential an commercial-business. This segment does not have a posted speed limit. With the speed data showing an 85th percentile speed of 27.0, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be posted and established for this area.

0.42 PAGE 284 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

RIDGEWAY ROAD HUNTINGTON DR TO LORAIN RD
DATE: 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
30 X X X 3 2.9% 100.0%
X X X X X 5 4.8% 97.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.6% 92.4%
X X X X X X 6 5.7% 84.8%
X X X X X X X 7 6.7% 79.0%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 17.1% 72.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 18.1% 55.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 12.4% 37.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 13.3% 24.8%
X X X X X X 6 5.7% 11.4%
20 X X X 3 2.9% 5.7%
X X X 3 2.9% 2.9%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 105
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 2.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 94.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.7 %
File: Ridgeway 2026-43
PAGE 285 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

RIDGEWAY ROAD HUNTINGTON DR TO LORAIN RD
DATE: 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 1:00 PM - 2:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 100.0%
32 X 100.0%
31 100.0%
30 X 100.0% }PACE
29 X 97.1% }PACE
28 X 92.4% }PACE
27 X 84.8% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
26 X 79.0% }PACE
25 X 72.4% }PACE
24 X 55.2% }PACE
23 X 37.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
22 X 24.8% }PACE
21 X 11.4% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
20 X 5.7%
19 X 2.9%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 2.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 23.7 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 94.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 5.7 %
Ridgeway 2026-43
PAGE 286 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

ROBLES AVENUE SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO SANTA ANITA AVE
DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 2:35 PM - 4:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF SIERRA MADRE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 28.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 21 - 30 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 78.2 %

POSTED SPEED LIMIT NOT POSTED
15 MPH (Advisory curve speed at Santa Anita)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - WINSTON / SIERRA MADRE
1,500

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/13/2026
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - WINSTON / SIERRA MADRE
CROSSWALKS AT WINSTON (sch) / SIERRA MADRE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES /YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVE (e/o Winston) & "L" BEND (at Santa Anitia)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density few)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF)/ SAN MARINO HIGH SCHOOL (rear)/ RESERVOIR FACILITY (at Santa Anita) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE POST & ESTABLISH
JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Robles 2026-44
This portion of Robles Avenue is a two lane roadway. Adjacent land uses include residential and the rear side of San Marino High School. This section does not have speed limit signs posted within the segment. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 28.0 mph and a median speed of 24.2 mph. With that, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be established and speed signs be installed in both directions for this segment.

0.19 PAGE 287 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

ROBLES AVENUE SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO SANTA ANITA AVE
DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 2:35 PM - 4:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X 2 1.5% 100.0%
0 0.0% 98.5%
X 1 0.8% 98.5%
0 0.0% 97.7%
X X 2 1.5% 97.7%
30 X X X X X X X X 8 6.0% 96.2%
X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 90.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.8% 85.0%
X X X X X 5 3.8% 75.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 10.5% 71.4%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 13.5% 60.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 12.8% 47.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.0% 34.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.0% 28.6%
X X X X X X 6 4.5% 22.6%
20 X X X X X X X 7 5.3% 18.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.5% 12.8%
X X X X X 5 3.8% 8.3%
X X 2 1.5% 4.5%
X X 2 1.5% 3.0%
15 X X 2 1.5% 1.5%
TOTAL VEHICLES 133
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 3.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 19.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 18.0 %
File: Robles 2026-44
PAGE 288 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

ROBLES AVENUE SIERRA MADRE BLVD TO SANTA ANITA AVE
DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 2:35 PM - 4:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 98.5%
33 X 98.5%
32 X 97.7%
31 X 97.7%
30 X 96.2% }PACE
29 X 90.2% }PACE
28 X 85.0% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
27 X 75.2% }PACE
26 X 71.4% }PACE
25 X 60.9% }PACE
24 X 47.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
23 X 34.6% }PACE
22 X 28.6% }PACE
21 X 22.6% }PACE
20 X 18.0%
19 X 12.8% - - - - - -15PCT
18 X 8.3%
17 X 4.5%
16 X 3.0%
15 X 1.5%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 3.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 24.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 78.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 19.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 18.0 %
Robles 2026-44
PAGE 289 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

ROSALIND ROAD VIRGINIA RD TO OAK GROVE AVE (W)
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:50 PM - 4:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY EAST OF VIRGINIA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 31.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 24 - 33 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 83.2 %

POSTED SPEED LIMIT NOT POSTED

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - VIRGINIA / OAK GROVE

CROSSWALKS NONE
1,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2026
HCI

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES (EB) - NO (WB)
OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME (areas of-WB)
RED CURB (small section of)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVE (continuous)

LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density few)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE POST & ESTABLISH
JUSTIFICATION:

F = FRONTING File: Rosalind 2026-45
This portion of Rosalind Road is a two lane roadway. The roadway has continuous slight to gradual vertical and horizontal curves and no speed limit signs posted within the segment. The adjacent land use is solely residential. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 31.0 mph and a median speed of 27.2 mph. With the nature of the area and the areas of limited sight distance at the roadway curves, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be established and speed signs to be installed for this segment.

0.14 PAGE 290 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

ROSALIND ROAD VIRGINIA RD TO OAK GROVE AVE (W)
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:50 PM - 4:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X 4 3.5% 100.0%
X X X 3 2.7% 96.5%
X X X 3 2.7% 93.8%
X X X X X X X 7 6.2% 91.2%
X X X X X X X 7 6.2% 85.0%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.5% 78.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.8% 67.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.6% 58.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.8% 47.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.8% 38.9%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 12.4% 30.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.1% 17.7%
X X X 3 2.7% 10.6%
X X X X 4 3.5% 8.0%
X X X 3 2.7% 4.4%
20 X X 2 1.8% 1.8%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 113
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 27.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 23.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.6 %
File: Rosalind 2026-45
PAGE 291 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

ROSALIND ROAD VIRGINIA RD TO OAK GROVE AVE (W)
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 3:50 PM - 4:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 96.5%
33 X 93.8% }PACE
32 X 91.2% }PACE
31 X 85.0% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
30 X 78.8% }PACE
29 X 67.3% }PACE
28 X 58.4% }PACE
27 X 47.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
26 X 38.9% }PACE
25 X 30.1% }PACE
24 X 17.7% }PACE
23 X 10.6% - - - - - -15PCT
22 X 8.0%
21 X 4.4%
20 X 1.8%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 27.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 83.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 23.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 10.6 %
Rosalind 2026-45
PAGE 292 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

ROSE AVENUE DEL MAR AVE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF WOODLAWN

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 35.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 29 - 38 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 86.8 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.20
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 3 0.60 0.61

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - SAN GABRIEL / DUARTE / DEL MAR

CROSSWALKS AT SAN GABRIEL / DUARTE
3,600

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/13/2026
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT SAN GABRIEL / DUARTE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING 2am-5am

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE VERY SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE, EXCEPT A SMALL CURVE (at San Gabriel)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at approaches)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS "RESIDENCE DISTRICT" CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Rose 2026-46
This segment of Rose Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 54 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.75 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 48 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph be reduced to 25 mph. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.75 PAGE 293 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

ROSE AVENUE DEL MAR AVE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 100.0%
X 1 0.6% 99.4%
X 1 0.6% 98.9%
X X 2 1.1% 98.3%
40 X X X X 4 2.3% 97.1%
X X 2 1.1% 94.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.6% 93.7%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 89.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.0% 85.6%
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 5.2% 77.6%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 5.2% 77.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 9.8% 72.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 25 14.4% 62.6% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 12.6% 48.3% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 10.9% 35.6%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 11.5% 24.7% X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.3% 13.2%
X X X X X X 6 3.4% 6.9%
X X 2 1.1% 3.4%
0 0.0% 2.3%
25 X X 2 1.1% 2.3%
X X 2 1.1% 1.1%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 174
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 86.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.9 %
File: Rose 2026-46
PAGE 294 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

ROSE AVENUE DEL MAR AVE TO SAN GABRIEL BLVD
DATE: 4/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:00 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 99.4%
42 X 98.9%
41 X 98.3%
40 X 97.1%
39 X 94.8%
38 X 93.7% }PACE
HCI
37 X 89.1% }PACE
36 X 85.6% }PACE
35 X 77.6% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
34 X 72.4% }PACE
33 X 62.6% }PACE
32 X 48.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
31 X 35.6% }PACE
30 X 24.7% }PACE
29 X 13.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
28 X 6.9%
27 X 3.4%
26 X 2.3%
25 X 2.3%
24 X 1.1%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 38 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 29 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 6.3 % MEDIAN SPEED: 32.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 86.8 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.9 %
Rose 2026-46
PAGE 295 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
ST. ALBANS ROAD MILL LANE TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/15/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF MONTEREY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 33.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 27 - 36 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 89.2 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH (NB) / NOT POSTED (SB)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.44
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 1 0.20 0.44
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 1 0.20 0.44
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 5 1.00 2.22

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HUNTINGTON, STOP- MILL / MONTEREY CROSSWALKS AT HUNTINGTON (sch) / MONTEREY
2,800

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/15/2026
HCI

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density medium)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE / AREAS OF NO ROADWAY STRIPING

WIDE ROADWAY

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH - POST SOUTHBOUND
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT CVC 515 - POST SOUTHBOUND JUSTIFICATION:

SB = SOUTHBOUND, NB = NORTHBOUND File: Saint Albans 2026-47 F = FRONTING
This segment of St. Albans meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 36 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.44 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 28.2 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. It is recommended that a 25 mph speed sign be installed for the southbound direction. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.44 PAGE 296 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
ST. ALBANS ROAD MILL LANE TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/15/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X 7 4.7% 90.5%
X X X X X 5 3.4% 85.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 82.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 11.5% 77.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 22 14.9% 65.5% 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 12.8% 50.7% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 23 15.5% 37.8% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.5% 22.3%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.1% 12.8%
X X X X 4 2.7% 6.8%
25 X 1 0.7% 4.1%
X X X 3 2.0% 3.4%
X 1 0.7% 1.4%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 148
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 27 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 89.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.8 %
File: Saint Albans 2026-47
PAGE 297 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
ST. ALBANS ROAD MILL LANE TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/15/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:00 PM - 12:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 99.3%
HCI
37 X 97.3%
36 X 95.9% }PACE
35 X 90.5% }PACE
34 X 85.8% }PACE
33 X 82.4% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
32 X 77.0% }PACE
31 X 65.5% }PACE
30 X 50.7% }PACE
29 X 37.8% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
28 X 22.3% }PACE
27 X 12.8% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
26 X 6.8%
25 X 4.1%
24 X 3.4%
23 X 1.4%
22 X 0.7%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 27 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 89.2 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.8 %
Saint Albans 2026-47
PAGE 298 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
ST. ALBANS ROAD HUNTINGTON DR TO LORAIN RD
DATE: 4/15/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:30 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF ADAIR

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 34.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 25 - 34 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HUNTINGTON, STOP -ROANOKE / LORAIN CROSSWALKS AT HUNTINGTON (sch) /ROANOKE / LORAIN
3,600

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/15/2026
HCI

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER WATCH CHILDREN SIGNS

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density medium)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE w/DOTS

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A RESIDENCE DISTRICT CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: St.Albans 2026-48
This segment of St. Albans meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 28 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.32 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 20.5 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduce to 25 mph speed. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.32 PAGE 299 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
ST. ALBANS ROAD HUNTINGTON DR TO LORAIN RD
DATE: 4/15/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:30 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.4% 100.0%
40 0 0.0% 98.6%
X X X X 4 2.9% 98.6%
X X 2 1.4% 95.7%
X 1 0.7% 94.3%
X X X X X X 6 4.3% 93.6%
35 X X X X X X X 7 5.0% 89.3%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X 7 5.0% 89.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.1% 84.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 11.4% 77.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 25 17.9% 65.7% X X X X X X X X X 9 6.4% 47.9%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.7% 41.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.1% 30.7%
X X X X X X X 7 5.0% 23.6%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.7% 18.6%
X X X X X X X 7 5.0% 12.9%
25 X X X X X X X X 8 5.7% 7.9%
X X 2 1.4% 2.1%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 140
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 31.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 2.1 %
File: St.Albans 2026-48
PAGE 300 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
ST. ALBANS ROAD HUNTINGTON DR TO LORAIN RD
DATE: 4/15/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 12:30 PM - 1:15 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 98.6%
39 X 98.6%
38 X 95.7%
HCI
37 X 94.3%
36 X 93.6%
35 X 89.3%
34 X 84.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
33 X 77.1% }PACE
32 X 65.7% }PACE
31 X 47.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
30 X 41.4% }PACE
29 X 30.7% }PACE
28 X 23.6% }PACE
27 X 18.6% }PACE
26 X 12.9% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
25 X 7.9% }PACE
24 X 2.1%
23 X 0.7%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 31.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 2.1 %
St.Albans 2026-48
PAGE 301 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SAN MARINO AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO EUSTON RD
DATE: 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:00 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF CALIFORNIA

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 31.5 MPH
10 MPH PACE 23 - 32 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 68.1 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 6 1.20 1.18
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 12 2.40 2.35

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - CALIFORNIA, STOP - EUSTON (& YIELD) / STRATFORD / ORLANDO

CROSSWALKS AT CALIFORNIA / EUSTON / ORLANDO

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
3,250

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/21/2026
HCI

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / NO
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCK OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER AREAS OF RED CURB

YIELD SOUTH OF EUSTON TO MERGE WITH SIERRA MADRE TRAFFIC

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE & SOLID DBL YELLOW (at approaches)

WIDE ROADWAY

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - ESTABLISH AS A "RESIDENCE DISTRICT" CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: San Marino 2026-49 This segment of San Marino Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 63 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.86 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 55 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515.

It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.86 PAGE 302 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SAN MARINO AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO EUSTON RD
DATE: 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:00 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X 5 3.5% 97.9%
X X X X X 5 3.5% 94.4%
X X X X X 5 3.5% 91.0%
X X X X X X X 7 4.9% 87.5%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.9% 82.6%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.6% 75.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.6% 68.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.6% 60.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.3% 54.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.6% 48.6%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7.6% 41.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.9% 33.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 6.9% 26.4%
X X X X X X 6 4.2% 19.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 6.3% 15.3%
20 X X X X X X 6 4.2% 9.0%
X X X X 4 2.8% 4.9%
X X 2 1.4% 2.1%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 144
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 68.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.4 %
File: San Marino 2026-49
PAGE 303 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SAN MARINO AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO EUSTON RD
DATE: 4/21/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 12:00 PM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 99.3%
35 X 97.9%
34 X 94.4%
33 X 91.0%
32 X 87.5% }PACE
31 X 82.6% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
30 X 75.7% }PACE
29 X 68.1% }PACE
28 X 60.4% }PACE
27 X 54.9% }PACE
26 X 48.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
25 X 41.0% }PACE
24 X 33.3% }PACE
23 X 26.4% }PACE
22 X 19.4%
21 X 15.3%
20 X 9.0% - - - - - -15PCT
19 X 4.9%
18 X 2.1%
17 X 0.7%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 32 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 23 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 31.5 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 12.5 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.2 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 68.1 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 21.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 19.4 %
San Marino 2026-49
PAGE 304 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SAN MARINO AVENUE HUNTINGTON DR TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:25 PM - 3:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF HUNTINGTON

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 33.6 MPH
10 MPH PACE 24 - 33 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 67.0 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
25 MPH ELECTRONIC SPEED BACK SIGN (SB-near Lorain)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 9 1.80 0.84
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 24 4.80 2.23

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HUNTINGTON, STOP - LORAINE

CROSSWALKS AT HUNTINGTON / LORAIN

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
10,350

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/13/2026
HCI

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCK OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER MARKED ON-STREET PARKING (Huntington to Roanoke - SB)

AREAS OF RED CURB & GREEN CURB
2 HR PARKING 9am-5pm (at Huntington) / SPEED CHECKED BY RADAR

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER PAINTED ISLAND & SOLID DBL YELLOW & SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF) / BUSINESS (at Huntington) / FIRE DEPT RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - ESTABLISH AS A "RESIDENCE DISTRICT" CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: San Marino 2026-50 SB = SOUTHBOUND
This segment of San Marino Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 37 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.57 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 36.5 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.57 PAGE 305 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SAN MARINO AVENUE HUNTINGTON DR TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:25 PM - 3:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X 8 4.4% 91.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.9% 86.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.0% 81.9%
X X X X X X X X X 9 4.9% 75.8%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.4% 70.9%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 8.2% 66.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 7.7% 58.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 7.1% 50.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.6% 43.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.6% 36.8%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 8.8% 30.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6.6% 21.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.4% 14.8%
X X X X X X 6 3.3% 10.4%
X X X X X X 6 3.3% 7.1%
20 X X 2 1.1% 3.8%
X X X 3 1.6% 2.7%
X X 2 1.1% 1.1%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 182
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 27.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 23.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.8 %
File: San Marino 2026-50
PAGE 306 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SAN MARINO AVENUE HUNTINGTON DR TO SOUTH CITY LIMIT
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:25 PM - 3:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 99.5%
38 X 98.4%
HCI
37 X 96.7%
36 X 94.0%
35 X 91.2%
34 X 86.8%
33 X 81.9% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
32 X 75.8% }PACE
31 X 70.9% }PACE
30 X 66.5% }PACE
29 X 58.2% }PACE
28 X 50.5% }PACE
27 X 43.4% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
26 X 36.8% }PACE
25 X 30.2% }PACE
24 X 21.4% }PACE
23 X 14.8% - - - - - -15PCT
22 X 10.4%
21 X 7.1%
20 X 3.8%
19 X 2.7%
18 X 1.1%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.6 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.1 % MEDIAN SPEED: 27.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 67.0 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 23.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 14.8 %
San Marino 2026-50
PAGE 307 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SANTA ANITA AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO ROBLES AVE
DATE: 4/14/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 9:30 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF CANTERBURY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 34.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 25 - 34 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 79.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 30 MPH
15 MPH (Advisory curve speed onto Robles)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - CALIFORNIA, STOP - LOMBARDY

CROSSWALKS AT CALFORINA / LOMBARDY

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
1,300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/14/2026
HCI

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER NO PARKING CITY STREET 2am-5am

SPEED CHECKED BY RADAR

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE w/ BEND AT ROBLES

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density medium)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW DOTS & SINGLE DASHED DOTS CENTERLINES

WIDE ROADWAY
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF) / RESERVOIR FACILITY (at Robles) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE REDUCE - ESTABLISH AS A "RESIDENCE DISTRICT" CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Santa Anita 2026-51 This segment of Santa Anita Avenue meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 45 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.53 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 33.9 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. It is recommended that the existing 30 mph speed limit be reduced to 25 mph. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.53 PAGE 308 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SANTA ANITA AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO ROBLES AVE
DATE: 4/14/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 9:30 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X X 3 2.3% 100.0%
0 0.0% 97.7%
40 X 1 0.8% 97.7%
X X X X X X 6 4.7% 96.9%
X 1 0.8% 92.2%
X X X X 4 3.1% 91.4%
X X X 3 2.3% 88.3%
35 X X X X X X 6 4.7% 85.9%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X 6 4.7% 85.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.2% 81.3%
X X X X X X 6 4.7% 71.1%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.8% 66.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.6% 58.6%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 14.8% 50.0% X X X X X X X X X X X 11 8.6% 35.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.0% 26.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 10.2% 19.5%
X X X 3 2.3% 9.4%
25 X X X X X X X 7 5.5% 7.0%
X X 2 1.6% 1.6%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 128
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 30.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 1.6 %
File: Santa Anita 2026-51
PAGE 309 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SANTA ANITA AVENUE NORTH CITY LIMIT TO ROBLES AVE
DATE: 4/14/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 9:30 AM - 11:30 AM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 97.7%
40 X 97.7%
39 X 96.9%
38 X 92.2%
HCI
37 X 91.4%
36 X 88.3%
35 X 85.9%
34 X 81.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
33 X 71.1% }PACE
32 X 66.4% }PACE
31 X 58.6% }PACE
30 X 50.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
29 X 35.2% }PACE
28 X 26.6% }PACE
27 X 19.5% }PACE
26 X 9.4% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
25 X 7.0% }PACE
24 X 1.6%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 18.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 30.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 79.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 26.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 1.6 %
Santa Anita 2026-51
PAGE 310 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
SHERWOOD ROAD GRANADA AVE TO ST. ALBANS RD
DATE: 3/12/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:30 AM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF OAK KNOLL

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 32.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 24 - 33 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 81.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - GRANADA (round-abt) / OAK KNOLL / OLD MILL-LORAIN-Chelsea

CROSSWALKS AT GRANADA
200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3/12/2026
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT GRANADA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWN GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT CURVE (at Lorain-Chelsea)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (medium-heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE

WIDE ROADWAY

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - ESTABLISH AS A "RESIDENCE DISTRICT" CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Sherwood 2026-52
This segment of Sherwood Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 43 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.45 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 28.8 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.45 PAGE 311 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
SHERWOOD ROAD GRANADA AVE TO ST. ALBANS RD
DATE: 3/12/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:30 AM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X 6 5.3% 93.0%
X X 2 1.8% 87.7%
X X X X X 5 4.4% 86.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.0% 81.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 13.2% 74.6%
30 X X X X X X X X X 9 7.9% 61.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.0% 53.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10.5% 46.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 11.4% 36.0%
X X X X X X X 7 6.1% 24.6%
25 X X X X X X X X 8 7.0% 18.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.0% 11.4%
X X X 3 2.6% 4.4%
X 1 0.9% 1.8%
0 0.0% 0.9%
20 X 1 0.9% 0.9%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 114
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.4 %
File: Sherwood 2026-52
PAGE 312 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O
SHERWOOD ROAD GRANADA AVE TO ST. ALBANS RD
DATE: 3/12/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 11:30 AM - 1:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 97.4%
38 X 96.5%
HCI
37 X 93.0%
36 X 93.0%
35 X 93.0%
34 X 87.7%
33 X 86.0% }PACE
32 X 81.6% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
31 X 74.6% }PACE
30 X 61.4% }PACE
29 X 53.5% }PACE
28 X 46.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
27 X 36.0% }PACE
26 X 24.6% }PACE
25 X 18.4% }PACE
24 X 11.4% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
23 X 4.4%
22 X 1.8%
21 X 0.9%
20 X 0.9%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 32.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 14.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.5 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 81.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.5 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 4.4 %
Sherwood 2026-52
PAGE 313 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SHERWOOD ROAD ALHAMBRA RD TO DEL MAR AVENUE
DATE: 3/11/2026 & 3/12/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF TWIN PALMS
DATE OF SURVEY 3/11/2026 & 3/12/2026
85th PERCENTILE 29.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 24 - 33 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 88.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 1 0.20 2.05
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 2 0.40 4.10

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - DEL MAR / RIDGEWAY / SAN MARINO / WEST HARVEN / WEST / PALMAS CROSSWALKS AT WEST (sch) / PALMAS (sch)
300

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4:15-5:30 PM & 1:00-1:45 PM
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT WEST (sch) / PALMAS (sch)

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO
ON-STREET PARKING YES (heavy)
OTHER NO STOPPING 2:00-3:45pm sch days only (Alhambra to Palmas)

ARES OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)
VERTICAL CURVE NONE (bend at Alhambra)
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT "S" CURVE (at Lorain)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (NF) / HUNTINGTON MIDDLE SCH (rear) / BASEBALL FIELDS (at school) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - ESTABLISH AS A "RESIDENCE DISTRICT" CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

NF = NON-FRONTING File: Sherwood 2026-53
This segment of Sherwood Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. For streets longer than a quarter mile, it exceeded the above ratio proportional to the street length. This segment has 93 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.89 miles, which exceeds the ratio of 57 dwelling houses to street length per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit. This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.89 PAGE 314 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SHERWOOD ROAD ALHAMBRA RD TO DEL MAR AVENUE
DATE: 3/12/2026 & 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 4:15-5:30 PM & 1:00-1:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X 2 1.6% 100.0%
X X X X X X X X 8 6.5% 98.4%
X X X X 4 3.3% 91.9%
X X X X 4 3.3% 88.6%
30 X X X X X 5 4.1% 85.4%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 8.1% 81.3%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 12.2% 73.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 15.4% 61.0%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 13.8% 45.5%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 14.6% 31.7%
X X X X X X X X X 9 7.3% 17.1%
X X X X X X X 7 5.7% 9.8%
X X X 3 2.4% 4.1%
X 1 0.8% 1.6%
20 0 0.0% 0.8%
X 1 0.8% 0.8%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 123
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 1.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 88.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 23.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.8 %
File: Sherwood 2026-53
PAGE 315 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SHERWOOD ROAD ALHAMBRA RD TO DEL MAR AVENUE
DATE: 3/12/2026 & 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 4:15-5:30 PM & 1:00-1:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 98.4% }PACE
32 X 91.9% }PACE
31 X 88.6% }PACE
30 X 85.4% }PACE
29 X 81.3% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
28 X 73.2% }PACE
27 X 61.0% }PACE
26 X 45.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
25 X 31.7% }PACE
24 X 17.1% }PACE
23 X 9.8% - - - - - -15PCT
22 X 4.1%
21 X 1.6%
20 X 0.8%
19 X 0.8%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 29.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 1.6 % MEDIAN SPEED: 26.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 88.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 23.7 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.8 %
Sherwood 2026-53
PAGE 316 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT TO EUSTON ROAD
DATE: 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA NORTHBOUND

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF ROBLES

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 42.1 MPH
10 MPH PACE 36 - 45 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 88.4 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
35 MPH (advisory curve speed at Huntley)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES - NORTHBOUND
9,000

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/27/2026
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HUNTINGTON / CALIFORNIA

CROSSWALKS AT HUNTINGTON / CALIFORNIA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVE (Canterbury to Euston)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (many)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER WIDE LANDSCAPED RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Sierra Madre nb 2026-54 This northbound section of Sierra Madre Boulevard has two lanes of travel and is 100% residential. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Although, the E & T Study resulted with an 85th percentile speed 42.1 mph, to prevent a 15 mph jump in speed from the adjacent southern segment with a 25 mph speed limit, it is recommended to maintain the existing 35 mph speed limit.

0.92 PAGE 317 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT TO EUSTON ROAD
DATE: 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

NORTHBOUND
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X X X 3 4.3% 100.0%
X X 2 2.9% 95.7%
X X X X X X 6 8.7% 92.8%
X X X X X X X X X 9 13.0% 84.1%
X X X X X X X X 8 11.6% 71.0%
40 X X X X X X X 7 10.1% 59.4%
X X X X X X X X X 9 13.0% 49.3%
X X X X X X X 7 10.1% 36.2%
X X X X X X 6 8.7% 26.1%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 8.7% 26.1%
X X X X 4 5.8% 17.4%
35 X X X 3 4.3% 11.6%
X X 2 2.9% 7.2%
X X X 3 4.3% 4.3%

0.0%

0.0%
30 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 69
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 88.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.6 %
File: Sierra Madre nb 2026-54
PAGE 318 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT TO EUSTON ROAD
DATE: 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:05 PM - 2:35 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

NORTHBOUND

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0% }PACE
44 X 95.7% }PACE
43 X 92.8% }PACE
42 X 84.1% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
41 X 71.0% }PACE
40 X 59.4% }PACE
39 X 49.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
HCI
39 X 49.3% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
38 X 36.2% }PACE
37 X 26.1% }PACE
36 X 17.4% }PACE
35 X 11.6% - - - - - -15PCT
34 X 7.2%
33 X 4.3%
32 X 0.0%
31 X 0.0%
30 X 0.0%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 45 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 42.1 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 7.2 % MEDIAN SPEED: 39.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 88.4 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 35.6 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 11.6 %
Sierra Madre nb 2026-54
PAGE 319 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT TO EUSTON ROAD
DATE: 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:40 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA SOUTHBOUND

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF LOMBARDY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 41.7 MPH
10 MPH PACE 34 - 43 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 84.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH
35 MPH (advisory curve speed at Canterbury)

ACCIDENT HISTORY
NO. OF MONTHS OBSERVED 60
COLLISIONS PER YEAR COLL./ MILLION VEH. MILES
SPEED-RELATED COLLISIONS 6 1.20 0.35
FATALITY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING PEDESTRIAN(S) 0 0.00 0.00
INVOLVING BICYCLIST(S) 0 0.00 0.00
TOTAL COLLISIONS 23 4.60 1.34

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES - SOUTHBOUND

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HUNTINGTON / CALIFORNIA

CROSSWALKS AT HUNTINGTON / CALIFORNIA
10,250

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/27/2026
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT HUNTINGTON / CALIFORNIA

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER AREAS OF RED CURB
NO PARKING CITY STREETS 9am-5pm

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL "S" CURVES
LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (many)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER WIDE LANDSCAPED MEDIAN ISLAND
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF) / BUSINESS-COMMERCIAL (at Huntington) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Sierra Madre sb 2026-55 This southbound section of Sierra Madre Boulevard has two lanes of travel. The adjacent land use is 100% residential fronting and non-fronting to the roadway. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Although, the E & T Study resulted with an 85th percentile speed

41.7 mph, to prevent a 15 mph jump in speed from the adjacent southern segment with a 25 mph speed limit, it is recommended to maintain the existing 35 mph speed limit.

0.92 PAGE 320 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT TO EUSTON ROAD
DATE: 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:40 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

SOUTHBOUND
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

SPEED 5 10 15 20 25 VEH. PCT. PCT.
60 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
55 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
50 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
45 X X X 3 3.5% 100.0%
X X X X 4 4.7% 96.5%
X X X 3 3.5% 91.8%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 11.8% 88.2%
X X X X X X 6 7.1% 76.5%
40 X X X X X X X 7 8.2% 69.4%
X X X X X X X 7 8.2% 61.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 12.9% 52.9%
X X X X X X X 7 8.2% 40.0%

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X X 7 8.2% 40.0%
X X X X X X X X X 9 10.6% 31.8%
35 X X X X X X X 7 8.2% 21.2%
X X X X X 5 5.9% 12.9%
X X X 3 3.5% 7.1%
X X 2 2.4% 3.5%
0 0.0% 1.2%
30 X 1 1.2% 1.2%

0.0%

0.0%
25 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 85
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 84.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.1 %
File: Sierra Madre sb 2026-55
PAGE 321 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SIERRA MADRE BOULEVARD NORTH CITY LIMIT TO EUSTON ROAD
DATE: 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E. BUENDIA
TIME: 2:40 PM - 3:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

SOUTHBOUND

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 96.5%
43 X 91.8% }PACE
42 X 88.2% }PACE
41 X 76.5% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
40 X 69.4% }PACE
39 X 61.2% }PACE
HCI
38 X 52.9% }PACE
37 X 40.0% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
36 X 31.8% }PACE
35 X 21.2% }PACE
34 X 12.9% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
33 X 7.1%
32 X 3.5%
31 X 1.2%
30 X 1.2%
29 X 0.0%
28 X 0.0%
27 X 0.0%
26 X 0.0%
25 X 0.0%
24 X 0.0%
23 X 0.0%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 43 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 41.7 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 11.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 37.8 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 84.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 7.1 %
Sierra Madre sb 2026-55
PAGE 322 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SIERRA MADRE BLVD / SAN MARINO AVE EUSTON RD TO HUNTINGTON DR DATE: 5/29/2026 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF HUNTINGTON

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 34.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 27 - 36 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.5 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH (NB) / 25 MPH (SB)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 2 LANES PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HUNTINGTON, STOP - EUSTON (slight left)

CROSSWALKS AT HUNTINGTON

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS
19,250

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
5/29/2026
HCI
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCKS OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER MAJORITY OF SEGMENT HAS RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE MODERATE "C" CURVE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD

SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (SB) - NO / NO (NB)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER WIDE LANDSCAPED RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND

SIERRA MADRE (SB) MERGES ON TO SAN MARINO (SB)
ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF) / DAY CARE CENTER / BUSINESS-COMMERCIAL (at Huntington) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NB - REDUCE, SB - NO CHANGE, "HIGH PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE USERS" CVC 22358.7(a)(2) JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Sierra Madre-San Marino 2026-56 This segment of Sierra Madre Boulevard and San Marino Avenue merges together. Just after Euston Road, the two southbound lanes of Sierra Madre Boulevard merge into the southbound lane of San Marino Avenue. The posted speed limit northbound is 35 mph and southbound is 25 mph. The adjacent land uses are residential, commercial / business at Huntington Drive. Field observations include wide median divider, no shoulders, large area of red curb near Huntington Drive, and a moderate "C" curve.

The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 34.9 mph which may suggest a 30 mph speed limit. However, in accordance with CVC 22358.7(a)(2), this segment is designated as a street with "high concentration of pedestrians and bike users", which allows the speed limit to be reduced by 5 mph. For the entire stretch of the segment, there are many restaurants and shops and heavy pedestrian traffic within a distance of 1,320 feet. Therefore, it is recommended that the existing 25 mph speed limit be maintained for the southbound direction; and to replace the existing 35 mph speed limit sign with a 25 mph sign in the northbound direction.

0.21 PAGE 323 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SIERRA MADRE BLVD / SAN MARINO AVEEUSTON RD TO HUNTINGTON DR DATE: 5/29/2026 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
X X X X X X 6 4.4% 96.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.8% 92.0%
35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.5% 86.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.5% 76.6%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.3% 67.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9.5% 59.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 7.3% 50.4%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 12.4% 43.1%
X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 30.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 10.9% 25.5%
X X X X X X X 7 5.1% 14.6%
X X X X 4 2.9% 9.5%
25 X X X X 4 2.9% 6.6%
X X 2 1.5% 3.6%
X X 2 1.5% 2.2%
X 1 0.7% 0.7%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 137
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 27 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 31.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.5 %
File: Sierra Madre-San Marino 2026-56
PAGE 324 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

SIERRA MADRE BLVD / SAN MARINO AVEEUSTON RD TO HUNTINGTON DR DATE: 5/29/2026 SURVEY BY: C. BUENDIA
TIME: 11:30 AM - 12:10 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
CUMMULATIVE PERCENT 1930
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
HCI
38 X 99.3%
37 X 96.4%
36 X 92.0% }PACE
35 X 86.1% }PACE
34 X 76.6% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
33 X 67.2% }PACE
32 X 59.9% }PACE
31 X 50.4% }PACE
30 X 43.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
29 X 30.7% }PACE
28 X 25.5% }PACE
27 X 14.6% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
26 X 9.5%
25 X 6.6%
24 X 3.6%
23 X 2.2%
22 X 0.7%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 36 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 27 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 34.9 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 31.0 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.5 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 27.0 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 9.5 %
Sierra Madre-San Marino 2026-56
PAGE 325 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

STRATFORD ROAD OXFORD RD TO SAN MARINO AVE
DATE: 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY WEST OF SAN MARINO

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 28.2 MPH
10 MPH PACE 21 - 30 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 94.3 %

POSTED SPEED LIMIT NOT POSTED

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - SAN MARINO / OXFORD
700

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/27/2026
HCI

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - SAN MARINO / OXFORD

CROSSWALKS AT OXFORD

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / YES

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER HEAVY ON-STREET PARKING DURING EVENTS AT THE HUNTINGTON'S (at Oxford)

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE NONE
HORIZONTAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL "C" CURVE (near San Marino)

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (few)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at approaches) / SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F) / THE HUNTINGTON'S GARDENS ETC (at Oxford) RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE ESTABLISH & POST
JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Stratford 2026-57
This portion of Stratford Road is a short 0.10 mile roadway with one lane per direction. The adjacent land use is solely residential.

Currently, this segment does not have a posted speed limit. With the speed study results showing an 85th percentile speed of 28.2 mph, it is recommended that a 25 mph speed limit be established and posted for this area.

0.10 PAGE 326 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

STRATFORD ROAD OXFORD RD TO SAN MARINO AVE
DATE: 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
X X 2 1.9% 100.0%
30 X X X X X 5 4.7% 98.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10.4% 93.4%
X X X X X X X X 8 7.5% 83.0%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 9.4% 75.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 17.0% 66.0%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 14.2% 49.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11.3% 34.9%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 9.4% 23.6%
X X X X 4 3.8% 14.2%
X X X X X X X 7 6.6% 10.4%
20 X X 2 1.9% 3.8%
X X 2 1.9% 1.9%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 106
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 1.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 25.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 94.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.8 %
File: Stratford 2026-57
PAGE 327 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

STRATFORD ROAD OXFORD RD TO SAN MARINO AVE
DATE: 4/27/2026 SURVEY BY: E.BUENDIA
TIME: 12:45 PM - 1:45 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 100.0%
35 X 100.0%
34 X 100.0%
33 X 100.0%
32 X 100.0%
31 100.0%
30 X 98.1% }PACE
29 X 93.4% }PACE
28 X 83.0% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
27 X 75.5% }PACE
26 X 66.0% }PACE
25 X 49.1% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
24 X 34.9% }PACE
23 X 23.6% }PACE
22 X 14.2% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
21 X 10.4% }PACE
20 X 3.8%
19 X 1.9%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 30 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 21 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 28.2 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 1.9 % MEDIAN SPEED: 25.1 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 94.3 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 22.1 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 3.8 %
Stratford 2026-57
PAGE 328 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

VIRGINIA ROAD OAK GROVE AVE TO ROSALIND RD
DATE: 4/14/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 2:30 PM - 3:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF OAK GROVE (Mid-Block)

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 33.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 25 - 34 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 84.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
20 MPH (Advisory curve speed NB+SB)

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - OAK GROVE / ROSALIND

CROSSWALKS NONE
3,200

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/14/2026
HCI

CROSSWALKS NONE

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES / FEW

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES

OTHER NO PARKING ANYTIME

AREAS OF RED CURB

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP/DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE-SWEEPING "C" CURVES (sweeping at Rosalind) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density medium)

STREET LIGHTING YES
OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE (at approaches)

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF)
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Virginia 2026-58
This portion of Virginia Road has one lane per direction with a posted 25 mph speed limit. The roadway has a gradual to moderate "C" curve south of Oak Grove Avenue and a sweeping "C" curve near Rosalinda Drive. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 33.0 mph and median speed of 28.9 mph. Although, the 85th percentile which may suggest a 30 mph speed limit, with the many moderate to sweeping horizontal curves, and limited sight distance at the roadway curves, it is recommended to maintain the existing speed limit of 25 mph.

0.36 PAGE 329 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

VIRGINIA ROAD OAK GROVE AVE TO ROSALIND RD
DATE: 4/14/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 2:30 PM - 3:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 96.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.5% 91.2%
X X X X X X X X X 9 5.3% 84.7%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 10.0% 79.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7.1% 69.4%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 10.6% 62.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 27 15.9% 51.8% X X X X X X X X 8 4.7% 35.9%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 10.0% 31.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8.2% 21.2%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6.5% 12.9%
X X X X X X X X 8 4.7% 6.5%
X 1 0.6% 1.8%
X 1 0.6% 1.2%
X 1 0.6% 0.6%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 170
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 84.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 25.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.5 %
File: Virginia 2026-58
PAGE 330 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

VIRGINIA ROAD OAK GROVE AVE TO ROSALIND RD
DATE: 4/14/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 2:30 PM - 3:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 99.4%
36 X 97.1%
35 X 96.5%
34 X 91.2% }PACE
33 X 84.7% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
32 X 79.4% }PACE
31 X 69.4% }PACE
30 X 62.4% }PACE
29 X 51.8% }PACE
28 X 35.9% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
27 X 31.2% }PACE
26 X 21.2% }PACE
25 X 12.9% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
24 X 6.5%
23 X 1.8%
22 X 1.2%
21 X 0.6%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 34 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 25 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 8.8 % MEDIAN SPEED: 28.9 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 84.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 25.3 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 6.5 %
Virginia 2026-58
PAGE 331 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

VIRGINIA ROAD ROSALIND RD TO EUSTON RD
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA
LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF MILL LANE (Mid-Block)

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 30.8 MPH
10 MPH PACE 24 - 33 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 92.6 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS STOP - EUSTON / SHENANDOAH / MILL / ROSALIND

CROSSWALKS AT EUSTON
2,450

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2026
HCI

CROSSWALKS AT EUSTON

PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES NO / NO

TRUCK TRAFFIC NO

ON-STREET PARKING YES (SB) - NO (NB)

OTHER AREAS OF NO PARKING ANYTIME & NO STOPPING ANYTIME (NB) NO PARKING 10pm-6am

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT-GRADUAL UP-DOWNHILL GRADES
HORIZONTAL CURVE GRADUAL-MODERATE-SWEEPING "C" CURVES (sweeping Shenandoa to Euston) LATERAL VISIBILITY LIMITED SIGHT DISTANCE (Many areas of)

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS YES / YES (density few)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SINGLE DASHED CENTERLINE / AREAS OF NO ROADWAY STRIPING

NARROW ROADWAY

ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF) / LACEY PARK
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE
JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Virginia 2026-59
NOTE: THE SIGHT DISTANCE IS 164 FT AT DRIVEWAY N/O MILL This portion of Virginia Road has one lane per direction with a posted 25 mph speed limit. The roadway has continuous gradual to moderate "S" curves and a sweeping "C" curve between Mill Lane and Euston Road. The sight distance at the driveway n/o Mill Lane is 164 ft. and a driveway s/o Rosalind Road is 135 ft. The speed study resulted with an 85th percentile speed of 30.8 mph and median speed of 27.3 mph. With the roadway vertical & horizontal curves, and the many areas of limited sight distance, it is recommended to maintain the existing speed limit of 25 mph.

0.55 PAGE 332 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

VIRGINIA ROAD ROSALIND RD TO EUSTON RD
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 0 0.0% 98.0%
X X X X 4 2.7% 98.0%
X X X X X X 6 4.0% 95.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 91.3%
X X X X X X X X 8 5.4% 85.9%
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 10.7% 80.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 11.4% 69.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 12.8% 58.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 13.4% 45.6%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9.4% 32.2%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 12.1% 22.8%
X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 8.1% 10.7%
X X X X 4 2.7% 2.7%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 149
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 27.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 92.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 2.7 %
File: Virginia 2026-59
PAGE 333 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

VIRGINIA ROAD ROSALIND RD TO EUSTON RD
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 100.0%
HCI
37 X 100.0%
36 X 98.0%
35 X 98.0%
34 X 98.0%
33 X 95.3% }PACE
32 X 91.3% }PACE
31 X 85.9% }PACE
30 X 80.5% - - - - - - - - 85PCT }PACE
29 X 69.8% }PACE
28 X 58.4% }PACE
27 X 45.6% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
26 X 32.2% }PACE
25 X 22.8% }PACE
24 X 10.7% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
23 X 2.7%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 30.8 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 4.7 % MEDIAN SPEED: 27.3 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 92.6 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 24.4 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 2.7 %
Virginia 2026-59
PAGE 334 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

VIRGINIA ROAD EUSTON RD TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 5:00 PM - 5:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY NORTH OF MONTEREY

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 33.0 MPH
10 MPH PACE 24 - 33 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 82.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION

TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HUNTINGTON, STOP - EUSTON / MONTEREY CROSSWALKS AT HUNTINGTON (sch) / MONTEREY / EUSTON
3,650

ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
4/16/2026
HCI
CROSSWALKS AT HUNTINGTON (sch) / MONTEREY / EUSTON
PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES YES (heavy) / YES
TRUCK TRAFFIC NO TRUCK OVER 3 TONS

ON-STREET PARKING YES
OTHER

ROADWAY FACTORS

LENGTH OF SEGMENT (MILES)

VERTICAL CURVE SLIGHT- UPHILL GRADE (NB)

HORIZONTAL CURVE NONE

LATERAL VISIBILITY GOOD

ROAD CONDITIONS GOOD
SIDEWALKS/DRIVEWAYS PARTIAL / YES (medium-heavy)

STREET LIGHTING YES

OTHER SINGLE DOTS CENTERLINE / SOLID DBL YELLOW CENTERLINE ADJACENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL (F/NF) / LACY PARK / SAN MARINO PARKS DEPT.

RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH
SPEED LIMIT CHANGE NO CHANGE - ESTABLISH AS A "RESIDENCE DISTRICT" CVC 515 JUSTIFICATION:

F/NF = FRONTING / NON-FRONTING File: Virginia 2026-60
This segment of Virginia Road meets the requirements of CVC 515 for a “Residence District” that within a distance of a quarter mile, the contiguous property fronting on both sides is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. This segment has 19 dwelling houses fronting the street over 0.25 miles, which exceeds the minimum of 16 dwelling housesor business structures per CVC 515. It is recommended that this segment be designated as a “Residence District” with a 25 MPH speed limit.

This segment does not require continued speed survey.

0.25 PAGE 335 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

VIRGINIA ROAD EUSTON RD TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 5:00 PM - 5:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA
NUMBER OF VEHICLES CUM.

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET
HCI
35 X X X X X X 6 2.7% 92.3%
X X X X X X X X X X 10 4.5% 89.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 9.5% 85.0% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 24 10.9% 75.5% X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 25 11.4% 64.5% 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 7.7% 53.2%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 20 9.1% 45.5%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 7.3% 36.4%
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 21 9.5% 29.1% X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5.5% 19.5%
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 6.8% 14.1%
X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5.0% 7.3%
X X X X X 5 2.3% 2.3%

0.0%

0.0%
20 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%
15 0.0%
TOTAL VEHICLES 220
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 25.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 2.3 %
File: Virginia 2026-60
PAGE 336 of 358

RADAR SPEED DISTRIBUTION SHEET

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

VIRGINIA ROAD EUSTON RD TO HUNTINGTON DR
DATE: 4/16/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 5:00 PM - 5:30 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

CUMMULATIVE PERCENT
SPEED 20 40 60 80 100
60 X 100.0%
59 X 100.0%
58 X 100.0%
57 X 100.0%
56 X 100.0%
55 X 100.0%
54 X 100.0%
53 X 100.0%
52 X 100.0%
51 X 100.0%
50 X 100.0%
49 X 100.0%
48 X 100.0%
47 X 100.0%
46 X 100.0%
45 X 100.0%
44 X 100.0%
43 X 100.0%
42 X 100.0%
41 X 100.0%
40 X 100.0%
39 X 100.0%
38 X 98.6%
HCI
37 X 97.3%
36 X 95.0%
35 X 92.3%
34 X 89.5%
33 X 85.0% - - - - - - - - -85PCT }PACE
32 X 75.5% }PACE
31 X 64.5% }PACE
30 X 53.2% }PACE
29 X 45.5% }PACE- - - - - -MEAN
28 X 36.4% }PACE
27 X 29.1% }PACE
26 X 19.5% }PACE
25 X 14.1% }PACE- - - - - -15PCT
24 X 7.3% }PACE
23 X 2.3%
22 X 0.0%
21 X 0.0%
20 X 0.0%
19 X 0.0%
18 X 0.0%
17 X 0.0%
16 X 0.0%
15 X 0.0%
UPPER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 33 MPH
LOWER LIMIT 10 MPH PACE: 24 MPH 85th PERCENTILE SPEED: 33.0 MPH PERCENT OVER PACE: 15.0 % MEDIAN SPEED: 29.6 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE: 82.7 % 15th PERCENTILE SPEED: 25.2 MPH PERCENT UNDER PACE: 2.3 %
Virginia 2026-60
PAGE 337 of 358

C I T Y O F S A N M A R I N O

VIRGINIA ROAD HUNTINGTON DR TO LORAIN RD
DATE: 3/13/2026 SURVEY BY: L. MARKLE
TIME: 1:50 PM - 2:50 PM CHECKED BY: SCOTT MA

PREVAILING SPEED DATA

LOCATION OF SURVEY SOUTH OF ROANOKE

DATE OF SURVEY
85th PERCENTILE 32.9 MPH
10 MPH PACE 25 - 34 MPH
PERCENT IN PACE 89.7 %
POSTED SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH

TRAFFIC FACTORS

AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
LANE CONFIGURATION 1 LANE PER DIRECTION
TRAFFIC CONTROLS SIGNAL - HUNTINGTON, STOP - ROANOKE (blinking)/ ALHAMBRA-LORAIN CROSSWALKS AT HUNTINGTON (sch) / ROANOKE / ALHAMBRA-LORAIN (sch) 4,600

San Marino City CouncilOctober 14, 2026

San Marino City Council
October 14, 2026