San Mateo City Council
February 5, 2024

CITY OF SAN MATEO
City Council Special Meeting
February 5, 2024
5:30 PM
City Hall Council Chamber
Entrance is on O’Farrell Street

COUNCIL MEMBERS
Lisa Diaz Nash, Mayor
Rob Newsom Jr., Deputy Mayor
Rich Hedges
Amourence Lee
Adam Loraine

AGENDA
THIS MEETING CAN BE ATTENDED IN PERSON OR REMOTE BY JOINING ZOOM – SEE CODES BELOW.

PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED BOTH IN PERSON AND REMOTEL Y.

SEE END OF AGENDA FOR OPTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING.

To join via Zoom – click here:

February 5, 2024
To join via telephone: (408) 638-0968
Webinar ID: 882 9837 8162 Passcode: 353891

CALL TO ORDER
Roll Call
AB 2449 Requests and Considerations for Meeting Participation by Teleconference due to Just Cause or Emergency Circumstances

STUDY SESSION
The public will have an opportunity to comment during the consideration of these items.

1. City Council Guidelines - Updates
Review and provide direction on proposed changes for consideration to the City Council's Guidelines.

CEQA:

This administrative action is not a project subject to CEQA, because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).)

ADJOURNMENT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AGENDAS:

Agendas and material are posted on the City’s website on the Friday preceding each Council Meeting and can be viewed on the City's website at
www.cityofsanmateo.org
. Any supplemental material distributed to the Council after the posting of the agenda will be made part of the official record.

WATCHING A MEETING ON TV:

City Council meetings are broadcast live on Comcast/channel 27, Wave/channel 26, or AT&T/channel 99.

For transmission problems during the broadcast, please call (650) 522-7099. For all other broadcast comments, call (650) 522-7040, Monday-Friday, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m.

WATCHING A MEETING ON A COMPUTER:

There are three ways to stream.
1) Public Meeting Portal
www.cityofsanmateo.org/publicmeetings
2) City YouTube channel and stream it on YouTube:
http://youtube.com/CityofSanMateo
3) Watch TV live stream:
https://www.cityofsanmateo.org/193/Channel-San-Mateo-Live-Stream

PUBLIC COMMENTS/REQUEST TO SPEAK
Prior to the Meeting

1 of 115

Send comments to:
[email protected]
until 4 p.m. the day of the meeting.

During the meeting
By Zoom:

Click the link at the top of the agenda and you’ll be added to the meeting. All attendees are muted by default. When the item of interest is open for consideration, select the “Raise Your Hand” icon and you will be called on at the appropriate time.

By telephone:

Call (408) 638-0968 and enter the conference ID found at the top of the meeting agenda. When the item of interest is open for consideration, select *9 to raise your hand. When called upon, press *6 to unmute, state your name and provide your comments.

In Person:

At the meeting complete a “Request to Speak” form, submit a request at the speaker kiosk or scan the QR code.

ACCESSIBILITY:

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, those with disabilities requiring special accommodations to participate in this meeting may contact the City Clerk’s Office at (650) 522-7040 or [email protected]
. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

2 of 115

CITY OF SAN MATEO
4 6
8 1

CITY OF SAN MATEO
Agenda Report
City Hall
330 W. 20th Avenue
San Mateo CA 94403
www.cityofsanmateo.org
Agenda Number: 1 Section Name: STUDY SESSION Account Number: 10-1111 File ID: 24-8419 TO: City Council
FROM: Alex Khojikian, City Manager
PREPARED BY: City Clerk's Office
MEETING DATE: February 05, 2024
SUBJECT:

City Council Guidelines - Updates
RECOMMENDATION:

Review and provide direction on proposed changes for consideration to the City Council's Guidelines and Code of Conduct BACKGROUND:

The City Council adopted its “Guidelines” to provide rules on how it conducts its business in August 2015. These were compiled from several stand-alone resolutions that the Council had historically relied on. The Guidelines have been amended seven times since its original adoption. This is due to several factors including law changes, process changes, experience with the rules and the realization of unintended consequences, trends in local governance practices, and in response to public concern raised on local issues. At the May 1, 2023 City Council meeting, a majority of Council supported bringing forward for consideration a more robust code of conduct in the Guidelines.

Staff is seeking direction from the Council on proposed language changes in the Guidelines in response to new or changing processes; to codify practices that have evolved since the last update in October 2022; and on the overhaul and update of a few major sections of the Guidelines having to do with meeting item hearing order, liaison assignments, and the Board and Commission appointment process. In addition, separate guidance is sought on replacing the current Council Member Conduct section with a more robust Code of Conduct that could entail a longer discussion and additional research.

The City Council has also adopted “Rules and Procedures” for its Boards and Commissions in a document aligned with the Council Guidelines (where applicable). At this study session, staff is looking for direction on the City Council Guidelines and then, as is our standard practice, will return for either another study session or for action on both the City Council’s rules and with an updated Board and Commissions rules that mirrors changes directed in the Guidelines. If Council directs a Code of Conduct, one will be proposed and adapted specific to the Boards and Commissions also.

Name Change
Staff is recommending changing the name from “City Council Guidelines” to “City Council Rules and Procedures” to more closely align with the intent; which was to establish rules for conducting business. Calling them Guidelines diminishes the importance of this document and causes confusion. Keeping it a simple title and being more specific to the intent would be beneficial to everyone’s understanding.

Council Rules – Current Practice Update
Attachment 1 is the current Guidelines (“Rules”) with a tracked changes version of proposed changes to more closely match current practices which have evolved over the last year. These include:

3 of 115

CITY OF SAN MATEO
4 6
8 1
•Minor language neutrality updates, tense changes, and grammar changes throughout the document •Providing clarity on expectations and alignment of roles between the Mayor and the City Council •More specificity around decision making protocols on the dais •In response to experience with remote public comment, addressing limited public forum in public meetings •Standardizing the practice of speaker timing based on the number of speakers •Clarifying the appeal speaker order and rebuttal options •Adding the AB 2449 check-in as part of the script at the beginning of every Council agenda •Removing some language that we don’t practice and is not necessary, such as how many speakers under ceremonial items
•Aligning the Rules with current practices, for instance initially it was thought a majority vote was required to place an item on an agenda, but Council seems comfortable with a majority consensus without a formal vote •Updating the timing for publication for receiving public comment on an agenda item Note: Any section highlighted in yellow in the attachment will be discussed separately.

Order of Consideration on an Agenda Item – Chapter 7
Council is asked to provide direction on the proposed action to change the order of how an individual item is handled in the public consideration process. Staff is proposing exchanging the order of council questions with public comment as follows:

Currently:
1) Staff presentation
2) Council questions
3) Public comment
4) Council additional questions, discussion and deliberation 5) Vote or action
Proposed:
1) Staff presentation
2) Public Comment
3) Council questions
4) Discussion & deliberation
5) Vote or action
Council Liaison Roles – Chapter 12
Staff is seeking Council direction specifically on whether the designee of “continuity” continues to make sense for these assignments. There was very little movement on this year’s assignment list from last year’s assignments. The Rules actually state (Chapter 12, Section 5) that continuity is intended for external agencies liaison roles; but the Council had designated Planning Commission and the Sustainability & Infrastructure Commission as continuity assignments. Council elected this year to change Planning Commission from Continuity to Mayor and Deputy Mayor as the standard. An unintended consequence of these Continuity designations is that a single council member could be on a high-profile assignment for years and that may not be fair for other council members seeking a high-profile assignment. A discussion is desired on whether to continue the practice of Continuity designation or to limit or cap it in some way.

Board and Commission Appointment Process – Chapter 13
Several years ago, the City established an appointment sub-committee comprised of the Mayor and the Council liaison to the commission to be the interviewing body and to make the recommendation to the Council for any openings on the City’s Boards and Commissions. Any Council Member could join any appointment sub-committee by requesting to do so.

All appointment sub-committee meetings are designated as Brown Act bodies and are open and public. In addition, they established the practice of creating a ranked eligibility list from those interviewed. The intent was to address long term vacancies that were occurring on commissions and be more efficient and timely in filling those vacancies. The staff liaison

4 of 115

CITY OF SAN MATEO
4 6
8 1
was also designated to be an advisor to the appointment sub-committee. The prior practice was for the full council to do all interviews. Staff is seeking direction on if the appointment sub-committee process is effective in the current environment, whether an eligibility list should or should not be used, and any other improvement in practices that need to occur.

Council Member Conduct – Chapter 6
Staff would like to receive direction on strengthening this section to provide more clarity on expectations, clearly laid out rules, relevant definitions to increase a common understanding, a process for public concern and complaints, and a discussion around repercussions for not following an adopted code of conduct.

First, many cities, towns, counties and states are actively looking at establishing or strengthening a Code of Conduct in response to the national trend highlighting a loss of civility and decorum in the political sphere and in public processes. In California, there is a significant increase in our professional ListServ inquiries to share codes of conduct as many organizations struggle with addressing this need. At the City Clerk’s New Law conference this past December, “When Decorum and Civility Do Not Work, Then What?” which has not previously been an educational offering at past conferences. From the national to the local level there is a need to fearlessly address this. In the City of San Mateo, we have personally experienced issues on and off the dais and this has led to a loss of public trust. There is a great deal of public interest and comment in defining a robust Code of Conduct which includes a procedure to hold public officials accountable and includes an avenue and process to empower action when an inappropriate action occurs that will meet the needs of the City of San Mateo community.

It is incumbent upon the City Council to take the lead on establishing a robust Code of Conduct as the governing body sets the example for its appointed bodies, employees, and residents to follow. By modeling adherence to rules of civility and decorum, accountability, and ethics the City Council sets the tone for public discourse and action.

Code of Conduct – Research
In proposing some material for Council consideration of a code of conduct, we considered public comment received in meetings and in writing including information from residents. The City also relied on material from the Institute for Local Government (20 sample codes), and sample codes provided by the following cities in response to an inquiry on the Clerk’s ListServ:

Values Principles
/ Purpose
Behavior
on the
Dais
Communication* Enforcement Sign an
Affirmation
1 Belmont X X X X
2 Chowchilla X X X X
3 Cypress X X X X X
4 El Cerrito X X X
5 Laguna
Beach X X X X
6 Los Gatos X X X X
7 Redwood
City X
8 Sacramento X X X
Only for
nepotism or
violating
whistleblowing
9 San Carlos X X X X
10 Santa Cruz X X X X X
11 Sunnyvale X X X X X
*Communication with colleagues, public, staff, advisory bodies

5 of 115

CITY OF SAN MATEO
4 6
8 1
Strategies to Strengthen Conduct
There are many ideas for strengthening Chapter 6 – Council Member Conduct to borrow from for Council consideration.

This is not meant to be an exhaustive or completely comprehensive list. Some strategies to think about include:

1. City Council Core Values – a listing of approximately six to ten values that are the underlying structure of the Code of Conduct and give guidance on how City officials conduct itself.

2. Principles – example: leadership and ethics must go hand-in-hand.

3. Development of an oath or member statement that includes the Code of Conduct requiring a signature affirming to have read, understood, and pledging adherence to the Code of Conduct for elected and appointed officials.

4. Begin the Code of Ethics with a clear purpose statement for its intended use.

5. Include a definition section defining the terms used to create clear and common understanding.

6. Better define the role and responsibility of Council Liaison to a commission

7. Establish an annual review of the Code as an ongoing practice.

8. Consider making the Code of Conduct be a separate stand-alone document to the Rules and Procedures.

9. Consider if all of the City’s commissions be mandated to take AB1234 Ethics Training every two years.

Elements in a Code of Conduct
The following are some themes, and not proposed wording or staff recommendations, that Council may want to consider.

1. Code of Conduct for City officials (elected and appointed) a. Represent the entire City for the community good – Act in the public interest b. Comply with the spirit and the letter of the law and policy c. Model operating by the code in all conduct, on and off the dais d. Respect the public process and governance systems
e. Do not state opinion, until the public process has run its course (in all communication avenues) f. Be aware of speaking in your official capacity versus as a private citizen g. Do not use inflammatory language, be aware of your own bias h. Listen to all voices, all deserve to be heard
i. Ensure statements are factual
j. Assume good intentions of all
k. Be respectful of all roles and responsibilities (colleagues and staff) l. Be responsive to colleagues and staff with timely communication m. Operate with civility and decorum

2. Conduct on the Dais
a. Treat all with fairness and equity – specifically each other, staff, and members of the public with dignity, courtesy, and respect
b. Be attentive to others, limiting interruptions and distractions c. Encourage diverse viewpoints in debate while being mindful not to prolong discourse or block consensus d. Agree to respectfully disagree
e. Be open minded
f. Keep comments clear, concise and germane
g. Focus on the issues and avoid personalizing debate
h. Present issues in a way that promotes discussion and resolution i. Don’t admonish or lecture
j. Keep campaign issues away from the dais

3. Actions to Enforce – some starter ideas
a. Private admonishment
b. Public admonishment Loss of committee assignments if repeated issues c. Automatic recusal if position stated ahead of the public process d. Other?

6 of 115

CITY OF SAN MATEO
4 6
8 1

4. Process to Enforce – need to define it
a. Who can report?
b. Who receives report?
c. How to report?
d. How is it acknowledged?

5. Boards & Commissions
a. Include all code and specify also advisory role not advocacy role b. Actions
i. Automatic reinterview for the seat
ii. Removal from commission per Charter
iii. Other?
Next Steps
Council to provide direction on the City Council Rules and direct for next steps:

1. Enough direction was given and staff will bring it back with a formal recommendation;

2. Or Council may choose to ask staff to schedule a second study session to continue to provide direction and feedback

3. Council could elect to appoint a Council sub-committee to work with the Clerk and key staff on crafting the additional code of conduct language for the Rules

4. Bring this back with a facilitator to assist with the conversation

5. Council could consider and direct a different process BUDGET IMPACT:

There is no budget impact from this administrative action.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

This administrative action is not a project subject to CEQA, because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).)

NOTICE PROVIDED
All meeting noticing requirements were met.

ATTACHMENTS
Att 1 - City Council Guidelines with Track Changes
Att 2 –Sample Codes of Conduct https://www.cityofsanmateo.org/DocumentCenter/Index/5308 Att 3 – Public Comment

STAFF CONTACT
Patrice Olds, City Clerk
[email protected]
(650) 522-7042

7 of 115

City Council Rules and Procedures
Guidelines

Adopted on August 17, 2015
by Resolution No. 82 (2015)

Amended by Council action on:

January 17, 2017, April 17, 2017, April 16, 2018, May 21, 2018, May 3, 2021, February 22, 2022, and October 17, 2022

8 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 2 City of San Mateo, Council Guidelines
Table of Contents

Chapter 1.  Purpose and Overview ............................................................................................  3 Chapter 2.  Authority of the City Council ...................................................................................  4 Chapter 3.  Key Governance Principles ......................................................................................  5 Chapter 4.  Duties ......................................................................................................................  7 Chapter 5.  Selection of Mayor and Deputy Mayor ..................................................................  11 Chapter 6.  Council Member Conduct ......................................................................................  13 Chapter 7.  Meetings ...............................................................................................................  14 Chapter 8.  Meeting Agendas ...................................................................................................  20 Chapter 9.  Financial Matters ...................................................................................................  23 Chapter 10.  Communication .....................................................................................................  28 Chapter 11.  Legislative ..............................................................................................................  33 Chapter 12.  Council Liaison Roles .............................................................................................  36 Chapter 13.  Boards and Commissions .......................................................................................  39 Chapter 14.  References .............................................................................................................  42

9 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 3 Chapter 1. Purpose and Overview
This handbook provides guidelines describes the way for the San Mateo City Council that describe the way the Councilto conduct does its business and the expectations for members, staff and the public to operate and engage with each other and the community as a whole . It is a compilation of all Council‐related rules and procedures that have been formally adopted by Council.

The purpose of these Rules and Procedures (Rules) guidelines is to set a standard of professionalism, civility and decorum for the conduct of the City Council’s business. San Mateo has a long and proud tradition of open government and civil, intelligent public discourse. These guidelines are intended to enhance public participation and Council debate so that the best possible decisions can be made for San Mateo.

Revisions to these Rules and ProceduresGuidelines
Amendments to these rules These guidelines, which must be approved by the City Council as a body, and are subject to review and future modification as needed.

City Council Vision
The City Council’s vision and strategic goals can be found on the City’s website:
http://www.cityofsanmateo.org/index.aspx?nid=167

10 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 4 Chapter 2. Authority of the City Council

1. The City Council is the policy and lawmaking body of the City. State and local laws define the powers and responsibilities of the City Council.

2. General Authorities and Applicability
Charter section 2.12 and the San Mateo Municipal Code provide that the City Council shall determine its own rules and order of business. When not in conflict with the Charter of the City of San Mateo, or the Constitution or laws of the State of California, these City Council Guidelines (“Guidelines”) shall be in effect upon adoption by resolution of the Council.

3. Revisions to these Rules
The Council shall review and revise these Rules Guidelines as needed.

4. Rosenberg’s Rules of Order
To the extent these Rules Guidelines do not address an issue of parliamentary procedure for legislative body meetings, Rosenberg’s Rules of Order: Simple Parliamentary Procedures for the 21st Century shall apply.

11 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 5 Chapter 3. Key Governance Principles
In 2022, the City will conducted its first by‐district election for City Council members, with districts 1, 3, and 5 holding district elections in November 2022 and districts 2 and 4 to holding its first district elections in November 2024. This new election process changes how council members are elected, but not how they govern. It is the intent of the City Council to continue the practice of governing with a citywide perspective. The City Council acts as a body, not as individuals. An overriding principle is that all members of the City Council continue to serve all of the people of San Mateo.

Key Governance Principles

1. Serving the Entire Community
A. The City Council wishes to remain united in its service to the community and will govern by considering the needs and interests of the community as a whole.

B. Members of the City Council will continue to serve all residents, regardless of whether they live within their district. Any member of the City Council may be responsive to requests from anyone in the community.

2. City Management and Governance
Professional management in a Council‐Manager form of government will continue, with all of the best management practices that the City Council currently receives.

3. Use of City Resources
A. The City Council will strive to use taxpayer resources efficiently and effectively, while providing consistent services for all residents. Resources will be allocated based on the City’s long‐term strategic plan and citywide considerations of service levels and financial capacity.

B. Budget allocations and financial considerations will not be made based on districts.

4. Distribution of Council Duties and Events
Fair distribution of duties and assignments is a priority. Long‐standing practices regarding invitations to members of the City Council to events and activities, appointments to committees and various bodies, and the process for board and commission appointments will remain in effect.

5. Communications and Access to Information

12 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 6 A. Council members will have equal access to information. Information necessary for the City Council to govern on a citywide basis will be shared with all City Councilmembers.

B. Communication resources will be provided on a citywide and/or program‐level basis with equitable distribution across districts,. while being consistent with legal requirements prohibiting the use of public resources for campaign purposes

13 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 7 Chapter 4. Duties

1. Duties of the Council
A. Refer to the City of San Mateo Charter for a detailed description of codified duties of the City Council.

B. Disaster Responsibilities

1. In the event of a disaster, the City Council holds the following roles:
a. Primarily, to make decisions that will enable the emergency operation to continue effectively.
b. To liaison to other governmental agencies that are responding to the disaster.
c.b. To assist in the conveyance of public information.

2. See Reference the “Elected Officials’ Guide to Managing Disasters” from the California Office of Emergency Services for a detailed description of the roles and responsibilities of Council Members in times of disaster.

2. Duties of Mayor
A. To conduct meetings of the City Council as its chairperson.

1. Ensure that consideration of items on the agenda move along without delay.

2. Ensure that petitioners, proponents and opponents are heard but not allowed to disrupt the meeting.

3. Ensure that decorum and civility is maintained at during the meeting.

4. In presiding over matters where the public has provided comment or testimony and/or raised questions, the Mayor should:
a. At the end of the public comment period, Rrestate if any the relevant questions were raised from the public coming before the Counciland .
b. Ddirect questions or comments requiring a response to staff for a response.

14 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 8 c.a. Ensure that staff and members of the public direct their comments to the chairpresiding officer and members.
d.b. If necessary, hHelp keep Council Member questions relevant to the matter being considered by the Council.
e.c. If necessary, Cconsider calling for a brief recess if orderly conduct of the meeting is being disrupted.
f.d. Announce the decision and vote of the Council on all items, this may occur with the assistance of the City Clerk, the City Manager, City Attorney or key staff presenting.subjects.

5. To ensure that each member of the Council is provided an opportunity to completely express their views on items of business, the Mayor should:
a. Actively seek Council Member comments and ensure See thatthat Council Members ask to be recognized by the Mayor before speaking to maintain an orderly process on the dais..

b. Make sure that each Council Member has had a first chance at providing comments, before allowing a Council Member to make another statement – unless they are asked to clarify prior statement.
a. See that Council Members ask to be recognized by the Mayor before speaking.
b.c. Ensure that each Council Member is given the opportunity to fully express their views.

B. To represent City Government as its chief elected official at community functions, events, meetings, and business outreach and retention visits.

C. On behalf of the City Council, to officially welcome dignitaries, officials, and special event gatherings.

D. To vote on behalf of the Council at regional meetings such as the San Mateo County Council of Cities/City Selection Committee; provided that the vote is not inconsistent with established policies or previously expressed Council consensus.

This is expected protocol for any Council Member who represents the City on any regional bodies.

15 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 9 E. To correspond on behalf of the Council on subjects, issues, and legislative proposals provided that opinions expressed on behalf of the Council or City Government are not inconsistent with established policies or previously expressed Council consensus.

F. To vote as the City’s “voting delegate” at the League of California Cities Annual Conference and other similar meetings. This responsibility may be delegated to another Council Member by action of the City Council.

G. To review the agendas of meetings of the City Council and participate in their preparation as necessary.

H. To recommend Council Members for liaison positions on various boards, commissions and agencies. The Mayor’s recommendations shall be discussed and confirmed by a majority vote of the Council and are subject to change.

I. To serve as the City’s primary media spokesperson in coordination with City staff.

Appropriate City staff should always be alerted to media contact. contact for the media.

J. Nothing under the Mayor’s duties shall limit any individual Council Member’s ability to interact with members of the public.

J.K. The Mayor is still subject to all duties of council members as listed below in number 4.

3. Duties of Deputy Mayor
In the absence of the Mayor from the City or a Council meeting, the Deputy Mayor shall possess all powers of the office of the Mayor; and be subject to all prescribed duties for that office.

4. Duties of Council Members
A. Arrive on time for all Council meetings.

B. Review all meeting materials in preparation for Council meetings and direct questions to staff before the meeting if any item is unclear or clarification is needed.

B.C. Always alert staff in advance of the meeting if an item is intended to be pulled off of the Consent Calendar or introduced under Reports and Announcements for future Council consideration.

16 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 10 D. Fulfill the appointed and liaison assignments to internal and external agencies, legislators, and the City’s boards and commissions with all due diligence needed for the requirements of that particular assignment. .

E. It is the responsibility of all members to assist the Mayor in running an efficient and effective meeting by assisting with the orderly disposition of items, helping ensure all members are heard, participating fully in meaningful discussion and deliberation, keeping comments succinct, concise and germane, and limiting repetitive comments. Council members are encouraged to hold their colleagues accountable for following these rules and do all in their power to contribute to the smooth running of a meeting for the community.

C.F. All Council Members are asked to alert appropriate staff when receiving media inquiries.

17 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 11 Chapter 5. Selection of Mayor and Deputy Mayor

1. City Council reorganization, including rotation of the office of Mayor and Deputy Mayor occurs annually at the regular meeting in December.

2. The City Council believes that experience as a Council Member will assist those who are selected to serve as Mayor or Deputy Mayor, and that it is in the City’s best interest that these selections be made in a manner that permits the Mayor and Deputy Mayor to gain that experience in cycles of governing and to acclimate themselves to the jobs, tasks, and roles prior to assuming their respective offices.

3. It is appropriate to base such succession on rotation, and seniority and election results according to the following:

A. Each Council Member has a specified position in the rotation sequence. In any year, the first person in the sequence is typically selected as Mayor, and the second in the sequence as the Deputy Mayor.

B. After serving as Mayor, that Council Member moves to the end of the rotation sequence, and the other four Council Members move forward.

C. When a Council Member is newly elected or appointed (as the result of a cancelled election), that new Council Member goes into the fourth position in the rotation, after all incumbents, but before the current outgoing Mayor.

D. If two or more Council Members are newly elected or appointed at the same time, the newly elected or appointed Council Members shall draw lots to determine their position relative to one another in the rotational sequence.

E. If a Council Member is appointed to fill a mid‐term vacancy, that Council Member will go to the bottom end of the rotational list.

F. Incumbent Council Members, when re‐elected, do not begin anew at the bottom end of the list, but rather retain their placement in the rotation.

G. If for any reason (death, resignation, recall, not seeking re‐election, etc.) a Council Member is removed from the rotation, the remaining Council Members move forward in the sequence.

H. A Council Member may decline to serve as Mayor or Deputy Mayor. In this case, the office would pass to the next Council Member on the list. The Council Member who declined may will drop back one position in the rotation.

18 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 12 4. When the Council reorganizes, the outgoing Mayor will nominate the Deputy Mayor to succeed him/her. The newly appointed Mayor will then nominate the next Council Member in the rotational sequence to serve as Deputy Mayor for the coming year.

5. The process described above shall guide the Ccouncil’s selection of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor; however, a majority of the City Council retains the authority to disregard the process and select any member of the City Council for these positions.

6. The City Clerk shall keep a list outlining the suggested rotational sequence and update it annually.

19 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 13 Chapter 6. Council Member Conduct

1. Members shall: This section shall be considered separately from the rest of the Rules A. put constituents first at all times;
B. treat each other, staff, and members of the public with dignity, courtesy, and respect;
C. maintain confidentiality of all closed session materials and discussion; D. be attentive to others, limiting interruptions and distractions; E. encourage diverse viewpoints in debate while being mindful not to prolong discourse or block consensus;
F. agree to respectfully disagree;
G. keep comments clear, concise, and on‐topic;
H. start and end meetings on time, work from the agenda; I. present problems in a way that promotes discussion and resolution; and

2. Council Members shall not participate as a volunteer in any of the City’s operating departments.

3. Council Members are subject to all the provisions of the City’s Harassment, Discrimination and Reasonable Accommodations for Disabilities Policy (#301).

20 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 14 Chapter 7. Meetings

1. All Council decisions must be taken at City Council meetings only after hearing the presentation, project applicants, and hearing all public comments/testimony, then only under council discussion  with colleagues should Council Member opinions be shared and deliberations engaged in .  Bbefore mtaking any decision or taking action., the City Council may be informed by project applicants, interested members of the public, and City staff.

2. No business may be transacted by the Council at a regular or special meeting unless a quorum of the membership is present (50% plus one of those currently serving).

3. Council Meeting Dates
A. If at any time any regular meeting of the Council falls on a holiday, the regular meeting shall be held on the next business day or the earliest business day within a week.

B. Once a year, adopt a schedule of Council meetings for the following year identifying any regular meeting dates that need to move due to major holidays or other conflicts.

C. Meeting dates may be amended with the approval of the Council.

4. Types of Meetings
A. Regular Meetings are conducted at City Hall Council Chambers on the first and third Monday nights of each month. In July, August, and December, only one meeting is held during the month. The meetings begin at 7:00 p.m. It is City policy to make every effort to complete and distribute the agenda and related reports by the preceding Thursday. For major complex projects and policies, the City will make every effort to distribute reports as early as possible before the meeting when the item will be considered.

B. Special Meetings are called at a non‐regular meeting date and time. They are called by the Mayor or Council with a minimum of 24 hours’ notice, versus 72 hours’ notice for regular meetings.

C. Study Sessions are special meetings that are held for the purpose of providing information to the City Council, particularly on issues that are more complex or more time‐consuming than matters typically scheduled on a regular City Council meeting. At study sessions Council Members may state their individual responses and questions to the information provided and may collectively provide direction to City staff. No action is taken at the study sessions, but direction may be given

21 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 15 D. Closed Sessions can be part of either special or regular meetings. The Council conducts its business in public to the greatest extent possible. State law recognizes that public discussion of certain items could jeopardize the public interest, compromise the City’s position, or cost the citizens of San Mateo financially, and, therefore, generally allows the City Council to hold closed session meetings for the consideration of certain personnel matters, labor negotiations, real property negotiations, matters of public security, and the discussion of litigation, among other things. These rules provide for strict confidentiality of City Council discussion as required by State law. The procedures for the conduct of the closed sessions shall be the same as those for open session meetings, except that the public, after an opportunity for public comment, are excluded.

E. Emergency Meetings are allowed per the Ralph M. Brown Act when an emergency situation involving matters upon which prompt action is necessary due to the disruption or threatened disruption of the public’s well‐being.

F. Adjourned Meetings due to Power Outages
F. In the event a quorum of the City Council loses electrical power or suffers an internet connection outage not corrected within 15 minutes, the meeting will may be adjourned to a date certain. Any items noticed as public hearings will be continued to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council. Any other agenda items the Council has not taken action on will be placed on a future agenda.

5. Voting
A motion, second, and a majority vote of the Council shall be required for any formal action of Council unless the law or charter require a different threshold.

6. The Mayor, with the approval of a majority of the Council, cmayn change the order of hearing of items on the agenda. Staff may make suggestions on the order due to practical and logistical issues.

7. Public Participation
A. Members of the public are encouraged and invited to participate in the legislative process by submitting written comments before the meeting or speaking in person or virtually when offered, at a meeting.

B. It is the intent of these rules to allow everyone to be heard without fear of jeers or cheers that may discourage public participation. For this reason, these rules are taken seriously. Disruptive or unruly behavior may result in removal from the Council meeting.

22 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 16 C. Public meetings are considered a limited public forum in which speaker must stay on‐topic if speaking to a particular agenda item. If speaking during general public comment, they must address matters within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City. If speakers fail to follow these rules, they will be warned, and if they continue to disregard the rules, their opportunity to speak will be ended.

D. The Mayor may, at their discretion with Council concurrence, limit the amount of time allotted to speakers when needed, per the following time limits.

B.

C.E. Generally, Time Llimits for public comment are dependent on the number of speakers:

1. Individual Speakers:
 between 1 ‐10: ‐ 3 minutes
 between 11‐20: 2 minutes

1. over 21 speakers: S1 minute

2. Organized group (in lieu of individual speakers of the group) – up to 15 minutes, for a group presentation, as many speakers are allowed as fit in that time allowance.

2.3. Yielding of Time. To ensure that all persons have an ample opportunity to be heard, all speakers will be recognized for the same amount of time. No speaker will be allowed to yield all or part of their time to another, and no speaker will be credited with time requested but not used by another.

3. The Mayor may, at their discretion, limit the amount of time allotted to the speaker(s)when needed
D.F. Members of the public are invited to speak at the lectern microphone to ensure all attendees, in person and remote, can adequately hear comments, and soand so that it can be captured on the video recording.

E.G. Individuals who wish to speak should submit a speaker card  to the City Clerk , or use the raise your hand feature virtually, to be called up at the appropriate time.

The Clerk will announce the last opportunity to submit forms or raise hands, and announce when the time has closed for public comment on any particular item.

8. Agendized Discussion Items (Public Hearings, New Business, Old Business) A. Staff / applicant presentation

23 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 17 B. Council questions to applicant and/or staff
C.B. Open public hearing (or public comment section) for testimony D.C. Close public hearing (or public comment section)
D. Response by staff to public questions/concerns, if warranted Council questions to applicant and/or staff
E.

F.E. Council discussion and deliberation
G.F. Council votes

9. Appeals
A. Appeals are public hearings and will follow the order stated in #8 with the following time allocations:

1. Appellant – 15 minutes

1.2. Applicant – 15 minutes

2.3. Individual Speakers – 3 min‐ as outlined in Section 7(D)1 above.

3.4. Rebuttal (Applies to Appellant, Applicant and Staff) – 5 minutes each

4.5. If the appellant is also not the applicant only one 15 minute presentation is allowed, the applicant shall also have 15 min, following the Appellant

5.6. Tenant Relocation Appeals Hearings – both the Landlord and the Tenant shall each be given 15 minutes to present, and each shall have a 5‐minute rebuttal.

B. Appeals from decisions of the City’s Boards and Commissions shall appear on the Council agenda for discussion. Council determines whether to affirm the action of the commission, refer the matter back to the commission, or reverse the decision.

C. Any person that addressed the Council during one of the fifteen‐minute periods may not speak again during the public comment period for individual speakers on the appeal.

24 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 18 10. Items Considered after 11:00 p.m.

At or about 11:00 pm, in order to ensure effective discourse on an item, Council will determine with a majority vote or consensus whether to continue with an item or if they will take up any remaining unheard items.

11. Action Minutes
A. The City Council shall use Action Minutes (action minutes contain very little, if any, narrative content) or light summary at the discretion of the City Clerk, to record their proceedings.

B. Motions and votes are shown in the record.

C. Media (audio/video) recordings will be used in order to provide a verbatim record of meetings as identified in the City’s Records Retention Schedule.

12. Conflict of Interest
A. The Political Reform Act (PRA), implemented, regulated and enforced by the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC), controls financial conflicts of interest.

B. The other applicable law is Government Code §1090, which applies only to City contracts in which a public official has a financial interest.

C. Whenever it appears to a Council Member they may have a prohibited financial interest in any City contract, or an item that may be presented to the City Council, the Council Member should consult with the City Attorney at the earliest opportunity for advice on whether a disqualifying conflict of interest exists.

D. If the City Attorney is consulted on such a matter, the City Attorney shall provide their advice in writing, and shall provide a copy of their opinion to the City Council, the City Manager, and the City Clerk.

E. With full consideration of the City Attorney’s advice, it is up to each individual Council Member to decide for themselves  him/herself wwhether there is a conflict of interest.

F. A member shall not vote upon any matter on which they have a conflict of interest.

G. A member shall openly state the reason for their conflict of interest.

H. A member who is disqualified by a conflict of interest shall recuse him/herself from the dais and leave the room unless it is during the Consent Calendar.

25 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 19 26 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 20 Chapter 8. Meeting Agendas

1. Agenda Order
City Council agendas will be prepared by the City Clerk and presented to the City Council in the order described below.

A. Opening

1. Pledge of Allegiance

2. Roll Call

2.3. AB 2449 Member requests to join virtually for Just Cause or Emergency Circumstances – vote is required

B. Ceremonial matters
The presentation and receipt of ceremonial resolutions and celebrations not requiring formal legislative action. In order to ensure the business of the meeting can be handled timely, no more than three (3) items will be scheduled under ceremonial in any meeting;. only one speaker representing the group; and no more than three (3) presentation slides may be used.

C. Consent Calendar
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion without discussion. If discussion is desired, that item may be removed by a Council Member and considered separately. Members of the Public may speak to any Consent Calendar item without the item being pulled.

D. Public Comment
Members of the public wishing to comment on any item not appearing on the agenda may address the City Council at this time. State law prevents Council from taking action on any matter not on the agenda. Comments may be referred to staff for follow up. Public comment is limited to a total of 15 minutes unless Council by majority extends the total time; however, an opportunity for additional public comment maywill be provided later in the agenda, if needed.

E. Public Hearing
Duly noticed hearings as mandated by local, state, or federal law, providing an opportunity for public review and comment of a proposed action by the Council.

27 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 21 F. Old Business
Non‐routine items that have been presented before that require further oral presentation and/or discussion before action is taken.

G. New Business
Non‐routine items requiring an oral presentation and discussion before action is taken.

H. Reports and Announcements
City Manager, City Attorney, and Council Members report on their various assignments and liaison roles, and Council Members may make individual requests to schedule future items for consideration. A majority votevote or consensus of Council is required to place a request on a future agenda. If a Council Member is going to make a request to agendize an item, such as a resolution of support, a copy of the proposed resolution should be sentd no later than the time of the agenda packet issuance in order to give the other Council Members adequate time to review and determine if it is something they would like to support.

I. Additional Public Comment (if needed)
J. Adjourn

2. Agenda Item Submission
A. Persons who can place matters on the agenda: City Manager or City Attorney B. Council Member:

1. A Council Member may request an item be considered on a future agenda.

Before the decision is made, staff will provide information on how much staff time is estimated to be required to produce the agenda report.  and, Then upon agreement through a vote of with a majority vote or consensus of Council, , staff will prepare an agenda report and place the item on a future agenda. Before the vote staff will provide information on how much staff time is estimated to be required to produce the agenda report.

2. Council Members may make this request verbally during a meeting or may submit a written request.

C. Members of the Public

1. A member of the public may request Council action in the following ways:

28 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 22 a. Write a letter or email to the City Council
b. Speak during the Public Comment period at a City Council meeting c. Attend annual Council goal setting meeting and provide input

2. Upon agreement of a majority of the City Council, Council will determine whether to place on a future agenda an item requested by the public.

29 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 23 Chapter 9. Financial Matters

1. Council Member Compensation
A. State law sets the overall level of compensation for City Council Members (California Government Code § 36516).

B. Compensation of Council Members is set by Resolution (see the San Mateo City Charter, Section 2.03 Compensation).

C. Council Member benefits are established in San Mateo City Charter, Section 2.04 Benefits and Expenses.

D. A full explanation of Council Member compensation is available on the City’s website.

2. City Council Expense Reimbursement Policy
A. Authorized Expenses

1. City funds, equipment, supplies, titles, and staff time must only be used for authorized city business. Expenses incurred in connection with the following types of activities generally constitute authorized expenses, as long as the other requirements of this policy are met:
a. Communicating with representatives of regional, state, and national government on matters of interest to the City.
b. Meeting with City staff on matters relating to City business. c. Attending educational seminars designed to improve officials’ skill and information levels.
d. Participating in local, regional, state, and national organizations whose activities effect the City’s interests; however, a member of the City Council shall not accept an elected or appointed position that would require anticipated costs to the City of more than $100 annually without City Council approval.
e. Recognizing the service to the City (for example, thanking a longtime employee with a retirement gift of nominal value). f. Attending fundraising events for nonprofit entities providing services of benefit to the City and /or its residents.
g. Attending City events.

30 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 24 h. Implementing a City approved strategy for attracting or retaining businesses to the City, which will typically involve at least one staff member.

2. All other expenses require prior approval by the City Council.

3. The City will not reimburse the following expenses:
a. The personal portion of any trip.
b. Political contributions or events.
c. Family expenses, including partner’s expenses when accompanying official on agency‐related business.
d. Entertainment expenses, such as movies, sporting events, or cultural events.
e. Non‐mileage personal automobile expenses, including repairs, citations, insurance or gasoline.

B. Cost Control
To conserve City resources and keep expenses within community standards for public officials, expenditures should adhere to the following guidelines. If expenses are incurred that exceed these guidelines, the cost borne or reimbursed by the City will be limited to the costs that fall within these guidelines.

1. Airfare
Airfares that are equal to or less than those available through the League of California Cities, the California State Association of Counties and the State of California are presumed to be the most economical and reasonable for purposes of reimbursement under this policy.  If no discounted airfare is available through these entities, then the most reasonable and economical airfare possible should be utilized.

2. Airport Parking
Long‐term parking must be used for travel exceeding 24 hours.

3. Automobile
Mileage shall be reimbursed at IRS rates presently in effect (see www.irs.gov). These rates are designed to compensate the driver for gasoline, insurance, maintenance, and other expenses. In addition, drivers

31 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 25 may be reimbursed for bridge and road tolls. For rental vehicles, only receipted fuel expenses will be reimbursed.

4. Car Rental
Rental rates that are equal or less than those available through the State of California’s website Car Rental Resources for State Travel shall be considered the most economical and reasonable for purposes of reimbursement under this policy.

5. Conferences/Meetings
If such lodging is in connection with a conference, lodging expenses must not exceed the group rate published by the conference sponsor for the meeting in question if such rates are available at the time of booking. If the group rate is not available, rates that are equal to or less than the group rate at the host hotel are presumed to be reasonable and reimbursable for purposes of this policy.

6. Internet
Officials will be reimbursed for Internet access connection and/or usage fees away from home, if Internet access is necessary for City business.

7. Lodging
Council members are expected to select the most cost‐effective and logical lodging available, including utilizing the lodging at the conference/training site, if available. If there is not specific lodging associated with the official City business, the City shall pay for actual lodging expenses up to the United States General Services Administration (GSA) maximum rate allowed by location (Per Diem Rates | GSA). This maximum applies to the room rate only and does not include any taxes or fees. Government rates for lodging are often available and should be sought. The City will pay only for standard single rooms, including taxes and fees, for individual Council members, and any additional nonbusiness expenses incurred will be paid by the Council member

8. Meals
The City will pay for a Council member’s meals during authorized, required travel up to the per diem amount (Per Diem Rates | GSA). If meals are included in the cost of a conference or training, the City will not pay for a meal that an employee elects to purchase from another source. Unlike lodging, using the per diem methodology for meals that is limited to the

32 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 26 GSA amount eliminates the need for employees to submit receipts. Thus, the Council member only needs to report the per diem amounts in the expense report, but not the actual receipts. This only applies to meals, as all other travel expenses require a receipt to substantiate the purchase.

When the meal function is an organized event, the official or employee shall be reimbursed the amount being charged by the event organizer for the meal. The City will not pay for alcohol/personal bar expenses.

9. Taxis/Shuttles
Taxis or shuttle fares may be reimbursed, including a 15 percent gratuity per fare, when the cost of such fares is equal or less than the cost of car rentals, gasoline, and parking combined, or when such transportation is necessary for time‐efficiency.

10. Telephone/Fax/Cellular
Officials will be reimbursed for actual telephone and fax expenses incurred on City business. Telephone bills should identify which calls were made on City business.

11. Transportation
Officials traveling on City business shall use the most economical mode and class of transportation reasonably consistent with scheduling needs and cargo space requirements, using the most direct, time‐efficient route.

Government and group rates must be used when available.

C. Expense Reports

1. Expense reimbursement requests must be submitted on an expense report form provided by the City. Reports must document how the expenditure met the requirements of this policy.

2. Expense reports must be submitted within 30 days of an expense being incurred; and must be accompanied by receipts documenting each expense.

3. Expense reports are a public record.

D. Audits of Expenses
All expenses are subject to verification that they comply with this policy.

E. Reports on Meetings

33 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 27 Each official shall briefly give an oral report on any Brown Act meetings they attended for which they receive expense reimbursement at their next City Council, Board, or Commission meeting.

F. Violation of this Policy
Under state law, use of public resources or falsifying expense reports in violation of this policy may result in any or all of the following: 1) loss of reimbursement privileges, 2) a demand for restitution to the City, 3) the agency’s reporting the expenses as income to the official to state and federal tax authorities, 4) civil penalties of up to $1,000 per day and three times the value of the resources used, and 5) prosecution for misuse of public resources.

34 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 28 Chapter 10. Communication

1. All communications are public records.

All letters, memoranda, email communications, texts and other social media platform writing  involving City Council Members and members of boards, commissions, committees, and task forces, the subject of which relate to the conduct of government or the performance of any governmental function, with a few exceptions as outlined in the Public Records Act, are public records.

2. The Council, in adopting this policy, does not waive attorney‐client‐privilege or any other privilege associated with a closed session authorized under the Ralph M. Brown Act.

3. Ralph M. Brown Act
Each Council Member should be mindful of all of the requirements of the Brown Act in communicating with each other.

4. Mail Processing
A. Members of the City Council may receive mail and other materials through City Hall.

B. City Clerk staff open all incoming mail for the Mayor and Council Members, unless it is labeled personal and confidential.

C. City Clerk’s Office staff disseminate these materials to individual Council Members.

City Staff will scan and email correspondence.

D. General correspondence addressed to Council Members as a whole may will be opened and delivered to all Council Members, if appropriate. A correspondence addressed to a single Council Member on a topic that is the subject matter jurisdiction of the city and/or due to come on an upcoming agenda will be shared with all Council Members.

5. Correspondence
A. The City Clerk is authorized to receive and take administrative action on all correspondence directed to the City Council. The City Clerk may also respond to correspondence submitted to the full City Council on non‐agenda items or authorize a staff member to respond. A courtesy copy is provided to each Council Member.

B. Generally, correspondence relating to a specific City Council agenda item shall be distributed with the agenda report; correspondence received after the publication

35 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 29 of agenda packet is towill  be compiled and distributed to the City Council prior to the City Council meeting (known as a Dais packet). This additional correspondence is appended to the Agenda Report as public comment on the public meeting portal and in the records repository permanent record. Any further correspondence received between posting of the Dais packet and until the end of when the item is heard, will also be appended to the Agenda report as supplemental correspondence.

C. After the City Council has taken a position on an issue, official correspondence should reflect this position. While Council Members who may disagree with a position are free to prepare correspondence on such issues as private citizens, City letterhead, official City Council title, and staff support should not be utilized. In addition, City letterhead and staff support cannot be utilized for personal or political purposes.

D. City letterhead, logo, insignia and brand, as well as staff support, cannot be utilized for personal or political purposes.

6. Electronic Communication Record Retention
A. All emails sent and received through the City server are saved for at least twohree years on the City’s network and are subject to the Public Records Act.

B. Communication on social media sites are saved for at least two years.

C. Text messages sent on any City‐provided device are saved for at least two years.

7. Social Media Use as a Council Member
Social media are internet‐based platforms that allow for interactive communication and engagement with the public. These may include (without limitation): Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, Snapchat, Nextdoor, Slack, blogs, etc.

The City’s image as a professional organization is critical to maintaining the respect of the public, and members should use discretion when posting or communicating on social media. If Council Members choose to maintain and use personal social media accounts to conduct City business, they must follow current federal and state regulations, as well as Council and City policies.

A. Brown Act:  Social media postings may turn into an interactive dialogue. The Brown Act has expanded to provide guidance on elected officials use of media platforms that are free of charge and open and accessible to the public.

1. Permitted Uses: You may answer questions, provide information to the public and solicit information from the public about city business; share a

36 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 30 City post to your Council Member site; and tag other elected officials in a post.

2. Prohibited Uses: A majority of the members may not use social media to discuss agency business and a member may not respond directly to any posting by another member regarding agency business including no ‘likes’ ‘thumbs up’, ‘emojis’ or other symbols.

B. First Amendment.: Councilmember social media platforms can become public forums subject to First Amendment requirements.  If a social media platform is 1) used for City business and 2) has interactive features that are accessible to the public without limitation, it is a public forum.  The City’s Social Media Policy contains rules for public participation and addresses what will constitute unacceptable content.  In general, officials may not block a member of the public from their social media sites if those sites have become public forums.  If unacceptable content appears on a site that has become a public forum, please consult with City staff.

C. Public Records: Members are prohibited from deleting social media posts and related comments regarding any City‐related matters to avoid violating the California Public Records Act. Social media is subject to the City’s record retention schedule.

D. Best practices: Officials should be honest and accurate when posting information or news, especially when communicating during a crisis or emergency. Any mistakes, misstatements and/or factual errors must be corrected quickly upon discovery. When possible, nNews of citywide importance should first be announced by the official City‐affiliated accounts then can be reshared by Council Members. Unless the member has been designated to serve as a spokesperson, members should never represent themselves as a spokesperson for the entire Council or City. Members should be mindful of recognizing that accomplishments of the City or Council are achieved by collective action of the entire body or organization, not by any individual council member.

8. Written Communications for Council Meetings
D. The deadline for the receipt of written communications for inclusion in the agenda packet is up to 4:00 pm the Wednesday before the Council meeting. This is to allow for adequate staff review and analysis, and to ensure public access to information, all plans, correspondence, and other documents supporting planning applications any item being heard by the City Council.

E. To be included in the Dais packet, communication may be received up until 4:00 pm the day of the scheduled meeting.

37 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 31 F. Materials distributed to Council Members during the meeting shall be available for viewing by the public during the meeting if the materials were prepared by the City or a Council Member, or at the conclusion of the meeting if prepared by another person.

G. If a Council Member receives materials regarding an agenda item, they shall forward it the City Clerk and the City Manager as soon as possible.

H. If late correspondence is received, the City Council will determine at the meeting whether to continue or refer the item to the appropriate Board and/or Commission if significant changes to a project, or significant new information has become known.

9. Council Communication to Boards and Commissions
A. Council Members should be mindful not to unduly influence—through  their attendance—the  decision at a Board or Commission meeting so as not to get ahead protect of the independent process of that body.

B. It is not appropriate for a Council Member to make public comments at a Board or Commission meeting.

10. Council ‐– Staff Relations
A. Individual Council Members may make requests of City staff through the City Manager or Department Head for limited research and information without the formal concurrence of a majority of the member’s colleagues. Requests that will require significant staff time may be referred to the full Council and only pursued if supported by a majority of the Council.

B. Council Members are encouraged to submit their questions on agenda items to the City Manager or Department Head (including copying the City Manager) as far in advance of the meeting as possible so that Staff can be prepared to respond at the Council meeting.

C. Council Members should direct any questions on agenda reports to the City Manager or their designee, usually the staff member presenting.

D. Clarifications or technical questions will be answered before the meeting whenever possible.

E. Questions and all Sstaff‐prepared responses will be forwarded to all Council Members.

11. Speaking for “the City”

38 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 32 Similar to written correspondence, when Council Members are requested to speak to groups or are asked the City Council’s position on an issue, the response should reflect the position of the City Council as a whole. Of course, a member may clarify their vote on a matter by stating, for example, “While I voted against X, the City Council voted in support of it.” When representing the City at meetings or other venues, it is important that those in attendance gain an understanding of the City Council’s position rather than that of an individual member.

12. Speaking as an Individual
On occasion, Council Members may wish to transmit correspondence on an issue upon which the City Council has yet to take a position or about an issue for which the City Council has no position. In these circumstances, members should clearly indicate in their communications that they are not speaking for the City Council as a whole, but for themselves as an individual member of the Council. City letterhead and office support may be utilized in these circumstances.

39 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 33 Chapter 11. Legislative

1. Council Legislative Committee
A. It is the policy of the City Council that the Council be involved in the development of the City’s position on significant pending federal and state legislation that may directly impact the City of San Mateo.

B. The offices of Mayor and Deputy Mayor are the Council’s Legislative Committee.

C. The Legislative Committee may meet annually or as needed to draft the City’s legislative priorities; and shall meet when necessary to develop recommendations for the City’s position on legislative matters.

D. Pending legislation for consideration by the Legislative Committee can be submitted to the Committee by a Council Member, City Manager, or by a Commission Staff Liaison if a majority of their commission voted in favor of submission to the Legislative Committee.

E. The Committee’s recommendations shall be presented to the City Council for its consideration; if there is a pressing and urgent need to comment on pending legislation and getting approval in a City Council meeting is not practical, the Legislative Committee may take immediate action to communicate with legislators and copy the entire City Council on the communication and provide a brief report of action taken under Reports and Announcements at the next City Council meeting
F. The Council shall direct the Mayor or other City official to communicate the City’s position on legislative matters to the appropriate legislative bodies.

2. Ceremonial Matters
A. There are several different types of action the Council may take to provide recognition or express appreciation:

1. Certifications of Appreciation or Recognition
Commendations typically issued to acknowledge the activities of a person or organization. These certificates may be issued by any member of the Council without formal action. Examples of traditional recipients would include departing Board and Commission Members, high school students with 4.0 grade point averages, Chamber of Commerce Outstanding Businesses Awards, recognizing Eagle Scouts, winners of local art or speech contests, etc.

40 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 34 2. Commendatory Resolutions
Typically used to handle matters requiring some type of formal memorialization such as the retirement of a long‐tenured employee, or outgoing Mayor or Council Member. These are not voted on like a standard Resolution of Council action would be.

3. Proclamations
Public announcements directing attention to a person, organization, or event. Proclamations will be issued subject to the policy described below.

B. Preparation of City Proclamations

1. It is the policy of the City Council to issue proclamations for certain events or causes, when such a proclamation positively impacts the community and conveys an affirmative message to residents. Examples of causes for which proclamations are regularly and routinely issued include; but are not limited to: notable accomplishments by citizens, youth groups, schools, local organizations, non‐profit groups, and local events that deserve special recognition. Discretion should be used in determining whether or not to issue a proclamation. Proclamations that are political in nature, are controversial, or that likely would not enjoy a high level of community interest and support, are discouraged.

2. It will be the policy of the City Council to process requests for proclamations in the following manner:
a. The City Clerk will review the request with the Mayor. b. If the Mayor determines that the proclamation request is consistent with the policy stated above, the Mayor will direct the City Clerk to prepare the proclamation and the proclamation will be issued. c. If the Mayor determines the proclamation request is not consistent with the policy stated above, the request will be routed to the other Council Members to determine if there is interest in issuing the proclamation.
d. If a Council Member has interest in issuing the proclamation that the Mayor determined was not consistent with this policy, that Council Member will sponsor the item and shall be responsible for drafting the language to be contained in the proclamation. The sponsor Council Member shall provide the draft proclamation language to the City Clerk.

41 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 35 e. Upon receipt of the draft proclamation language, the City Clerk will place the item for consideration to considering issuing the proclamation on the Consent Calendar at the next available meeting. The proclamation will be issued upon a majority vote of the Council in support of issuing the proclamation. Depending on the nature and time‐sensitivity of the request, the Mayor and Deputy Mayor can act without full formal concurrence of the Council when the situation warrants.

42 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 36 Chapter 12. Council Liaison Roles

1. The City Council will collectively review and approve liaison appointments. The recommended appointments will, to the best of the Council’s ability, attempt to match the requested positions with the needs of the respective body and the experience of the Council Member, while also attempting to equitably balance the distribution of assignments.

2. It is generally suggested that newly elected Council Members undertake a limited number of assignments during their first year, to allow opportunity to gain familiarity with the obligations and expectations of the role.

3. The assignment of City Council liaisons is conducted annually according to the following process:

A. Following the reorganization in December, the City Clerk will distribute a memo to each Council Member which will include a list of potential liaison assignments.

B. Each Council Member will complete the list in a manner which prioritizes the assignments of interest to them; and will submit their list only to the City Clerk in December.

C. The ranking process uses the following methodology:

1. Top priority = I really want this (please mark at most only two #1s)

2. This is something I would like to have

3. I’ll take this one for the team

4. I do not want (perhaps the meeting timing does not work for you)

D. The City Clerk will assemble responses into a table and provide it to the Mayor.

The Mayor uses the following additional criteria to make assignments: Continuity assignments remain with the assignee unless the member is opting to step down from the role (see section 5 below); assignments will be assigned by highest priority desired with 1’s first, 2’s second etc.; in case of ties, overall balance and then seniority will be taken into account. (fFor example, did the Council Member get their other first choice? Does the Council Member have other “plum” continuity assignments; Iideally, everyone will get at least one of their top priorities; and you do not need to use your top rankings to hold onto continuity assignments.

E. In the event that a liaison has not been identified for each commission, the Mayor will divide any remaining liaison positions amongst the Council, attempting to equitably balance the distribution of the assignments and associated workload.

43 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 37 F. The Mayor, working with the City Manager and City Clerk, will utilize the responses to present an Agenda Report and conduct a discussion at the first meeting in January regarding the liaison appointments.

G. The Mayor and Deputy Mayor have traditionally been assigned to the following bodies:

1. City Council Legislative Committee ‐ ordered by Resolution 158 (1981)

2. City Budget and Audit Committee

2. 3. Council of Cities – City Selection Committee (Mayor)

3. Honorary Chair of Sister Cities Association (Mayor)Planning Commission

4. Council of Cities – City Selection Committee (Mayor with Deputy Mayor as alternate)
Honorary Chair of Sister Cities Association (Mayor)

4.5. H. The City Clerk shall maintain a list of all such appointments. The final liaison list will be distributed to all Council Members and posted on the City’s website.

4. Liaison to the City’s Boards and Commissions
A. Each of the City’s Boards and Commissions has a Council Member who serves as its Council liaison.

B. Council Members should act as an advisor and resource to commissioners and the commission’s staff liaison when issues regarding process, procedure, attendance, interpersonal or public relations arise.

C. The Council liaison serves on the Appointment SubcommitteeAppointment subcommittee for the Commission they are assigned to. In the event the Mayor is serving as the commission’s liaison, the minimum subcommittee shall consist of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor.

5. Continuity Appointments to External Agencies
A. The City Council has identified certain appointments for which there is a strong need and desire for consistency and continuity in terms of Council participation and representation and the Mayor will maintain the current Council Member assigned as liaison to that body. The Council will have an opportunity at its annual review to see if a supplemental designation is needed due to changing conditions or if new bodies have been added to the list.  All continuity appointment should also have an aAlternate assigned, so a member can be ready to take over the role if needed.

44 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 38 1.

B. Liaison appointments to these bodies would not annually be re‐assigned to another Council Member, as this would not provide the desired consistency. If it became necessary to re‐assign the liaison for one of these bodies as the result of a vacancy or other reason, the liaison role would not typically be assigned to a newly elected Council Member. A Council Member with an interest in serving as liaison to any of these continuity bodies should confer with the current representative; and consider acting as an alternate or “shadowing” the current liaison for a time to learn more about the body’s functions and duties.

C. If a Council Member who is assigned as liaison to one of the aforementioned bodies anticipates leaving office, every effort should be made to mentor another Council Member so that those critical relationships can continue uninterrupted.

6. Council of Cities Appointments
A. In the case of appointments made by the regional Council of Cities ‐ City Selection Committee, upon receipt of the City Selection Committee agenda packet listing all positions and nominees to be voted on, if time allows, the City Council may schedule a special meeting prior to the Council of Cities meeting to discuss and agree upon preferred appointees. Tthis will allow the Mayor, or their proxy, to have clear direction on whom to vote for that reflects the best interest of the City.

If scheduling a meeting is not practical, the Mayor and Deputy Mayor may confer on the vote. In the case of nominations from the floor at the City Selection voting meeting, the Mayor, or their proxy, will vote their conscience based on the feedback previously given by the City Council as a whole. In December every year upon the Mayor’s rotation, a standing proxy shall be filled out and filed with the City Selection Committee for the year naming who may vote in the Mayor’s absence. The Deputy Mayor will be given first priority followed by any Council Member who has the most latitude and ability to attend the meetings.

45 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 39 Chapter 13. Boards and Commissions

1. Refer to the San Mateo City Charter Article VI on Boards and Commissions.

2. Council Members should refrain from participation at Board and Commission meetings to avoid influencing the outcome of those meetings.

3. Reappointments, Vacancies, and Appointments
A. The City Clerk’s Office manages the Boards and Commissions (hereafter referred to as “Commission” for ease of reference) application process. The process begins with the Clerk contacting members who are eligible for appointment to a second term and finding out their interest in reappointment.

B. The City Clerk then shares the results with each appointment subcommitteeappointment subcommittee and receives direction on the need to schedule an agendized appointment subcommitteeappointment subcommittee meeting to provide direction on reappointments. The default is that currently serving Commissioners will each be interviewed for reappointment. However, if it is determined that a commissioner’s performance is outstanding, or that other factors necessitate keeping them in their role, then an automatic reappointment can occur with a majority vote or majority consensus of the City Council. Any commission seat selected for re‐interviews, means the seat will be processed as part of the full annual recruitment and the currently sitting commissioner may be interviewed along with other applicants.

C. The City Clerk recruits for all open seats utilizing multiple avenues including:
advertising, website, social media, and networking lists to present qualified candidates to the Council for consideration.

D. The interview and selection of candidates is an open process.

E. The City Clerk receives the applications (ideally a minimum of three applications is sought for each vacant seat) and arranges for the appropriate sub‐committee, in a noticed special meeting, to interview applicants and form their recommendation.

F. Commissioners, Board and committee members (hereafter referred to as “Commissioners” for ease of reference) serve staggered terms.

G. An “Appointment SubcommitteeAppointment subcommittee” may include up to five City Council members. The City Council shall appoint the members of the Appointment SubcommitteeAppointment subcommittee.  As a minimum, the Appointment SubcommitteeAppointment subcommittee shall include; and a quorum shall be established as: 1) the Mayor (or their Council designee) and the Council liaison to the Commission. The Department Head affiliated with that

46 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 40 Commission shall participate as a non‐voting member of the Appointment SubcommitteeAppointment subcommittee.

H. Except when reappointment is recommended, or an established eligibility list is used, the Appointment SubcommitteeAppointment subcommittee shall conduct candidate interviews and make a recommendation for Council approval.

Interviews shall be conducted in a noticed public meeting with at least a quorum of the Appointment SubcommitteeAppointment subcommittee present.

I. At the conclusion of an Appointment SubcommitteeAppointment subcommittee’s interviews of candidates, and the agreement on the recommended candidate, the appointment subcommitteeappointment subcommittee may then designate up to two applicants who would be considered for listing on the eligibility list for a one‐ year period. The eligibility list is then ranked according to preferred next seating to a Commission vacancy. The list is only established with the full agreement of the Appointment SubcommitteeAppointment subcommittee. It is not a requirement that an eligibility list be established if there are not applicants that are deemed qualified. This list may be used for automatic next appointments in the event of an unscheduled vacancy, the next person on the eligibility list would be submitted as the recommended candidate from the appointment subcommitteeappointment subcommittee on the next City Council regular meeting Consent Calendar.

J. The full Council will receive the Appointment SubcommitteeAppointment subcommittee’s recommendation and the full list of candidates for each opening.

K. The Appointment SubcommitteeAppointment subcommittee recommendations for new and reappointed Commissioners are confirmed by Council under the Consent Calendar at regular Council meetings. An agenda report summarizing the Subcommittee’s recommendations and including the full list of candidates reviewed for each opening will be provided to the full City Council. Council may adopt the recommendations as presented or pull the item for further discussion.

The City Council can consider for appointment any of the candidates interviewed.

L. A majority vote of Council approves the appointees.

M. Commission recruitment begins annually in the month of March, and completes in May, in order to ensure continuity on commissions before terms end June 10th.

N. Unscheduled Vacancies

1. Subject to the Maddy Act (California Government Code § 54970), if an unscheduled vacancy occurs on a commission, the Council may either appoint from the pool of applicants on file (the eligibility list if there is one available) or open up the position to new applications where the above process is followed.

47 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 41 2. For such non‐routine vacancies, the announcement for new applications is made as soon as possible in order to maintain viable memberships on the various boards and commissions.

3. All appointments occur in an open public meeting.

O. Youth Activities Council (YAC) Selection Process
The YAC is the only group not appointed directly by the City Council but through an application method administered by the Parks and Recreation Department.

High school students from all of the City’s public high schools, as well as Junipero Serra High School and Nueva Upper School, are recruited for potential participation starting in the late spring of each year.

48 of 115

San Mateo City Council Guidelines   Proposed Revisions 2/5/24 10/17/22 42 Chapter 14. References

1. San Mateo City Charter, §2.03, 2.04, 2.12, Article VI

2. Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code, § 54950 et seq.)

3. California Government Code, § 53234 et seq.

4. San Mateo Municipal Code

5. California Public Records Act (California Government Code, § 6250 et seq.)

6. AB 1234 California Government Code, § 53232.3

7. Rosenberg’s Rules of Order

8. Emergency Guide for Elected Officials

49 of 115

From: [email protected]
To: Alex Khojikian
Cc: City Council (San Mateo); City Attorney"s Office
Subject: Codes of Conduct Status
Date: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 2:29:12 PM
Attachments: image001.png
ESM Presentation 1 May 2023.pdf
May 1 2023 Council Minutes.pdf
Dear Mr. Khojikian,
On May 1, 2023, Ethics San Mateo, during public comments on Agenda item 7, presented recommendations for establishing a comprehensive set of codes of conduct and ethical standards to the Council. The presentation and minutes are attached for your convenience.

As memorialized in the minutes:
“A majority consensus of Council is to direct staff to look at other codes of conduct and to bring back strengthened code of conducts for Council consideration at a future date.” As almost seven months has passed since this directive from Council, Ethics San Mateo requests that you provide a status of this item.

Regards,
Dave Cohen, President/CEO
Ethics San Mateo, A California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation

DEDICATED TO TRUTH, TRANSPARENCY AND ETHICAL CONDUCT IN CITY GOVERNMENT

50 of 115

ETHICS SAN MATEO

DEDICATED TO TRUTH, TRANSPARENCY AND ETHICAL CONDUCT IN CITY GOVERNMENT Ethics San Mateo - A California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation www.EthicsSanMateo.com

Recommendations by Ethics San Mateo
for
City of San Mateo Council Member
Code of Conduct
and
Ethics Standards

SUMMARY

In an article, "Beyond Ethics: Establishing a Code of Conduct to Guide Your Council" published in December 2019 by Western City magazine1, the author Rod Gould writes: “It is often said that ethics is the foundation of public service and essential for public trust and confidence in public officials.”

Ethics San Mateo, a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation, was formed with those words as part of our foundational focus. Our mission to lead and support efforts by the residents of San Mateo to ensure our city is served according to the highest level of ethical standards and behavior is in direct support of this important concept.

As the San Mateo City Council is conducting a study session to examine and discuss revisions and additions to the Rules, Duties, Procedures and Code of Conduct applicable to the City Council, Ethics San Mateo is pleased to support and participate by providing this document in advance of this study session and our public comment during the session.

Above all, Ethics San Mateo strongly recommends the City Council consider engaging with recognized experts in the field of Government Ethics and Codes of Conduct. Please consider collaboration with the following organizations:

• Institute for Local Government (https://www.ca-ilg.org/find/results/ethics) • The League of Western Cities (https://www.calcities.org) • The Markkula Center for Applied Ethics - Santa Clara University (https://www.scu.edu/ethics/)

We recognize that the focus of the current study session is Council Member rules, procedures and Code of Conduct. Therefore we do not specifically include Commissions and Boards in

1 Gould, Rod, Beyond Ethics: Establishing a Code of Conduct to Guide Your Council, Western City (December 1, 2019)

51 of 115

Ethics San Mateo - A California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation www.EthicsSanMateo.com

these recommendations, however a similar set of recommendations is applicable to Commissions and Boards.

In summary, we are suggesting improvements and additions to the topics below, including:

• Strengthening of the rules and making adherence mandatory by all elected Council Members. • Enforcement of rules
• Mandatory investigation into credible claims of rules violations • Social Media
• Electronic Communications
• Conflicts of Interest (Financial and General)
• Recusal
• Council Member Conduct
• Serving the Community First (Prioritizing Resident Input)

The following details our recommendations for council consideration.

GENERAL

1. Add an Oath to abide by the city’s Rules, Code of Conduct and Ethics Standards. All Council Members. must swear to abide by this oath.

2. As evidenced by recent events, the current document “City Council Guidelines” is either insufficient or unenforceable. The document should be revised to minimize these kinds of occurrences, as follows:

a. Remove the terms “Guidelines” and “Guideline.” Replace them with “Rules”.

b. Add an oversight function.

c. Add mandatory processes for reporting potential violations of the rules.

d. Add provisions and procedures to establish the rules as mandatory, with penalty provisions for violations.

52 of 115

Ethics San Mateo - A California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation www.EthicsSanMateo.com

INVESTIGATION OF RULES VIOLATIONS

a. Require the City Council, assisted by the City Attorney, to investigate credible reports of Rules violations.

b. If the City Council fails to investigate a reported potential Rules violation, or the results are insufficient or significantly flawed in the opinion of the City Attorney, empower the City Attorney to conduct, or cause, an investigation of violations of the Rules independent of the City Council.

c. Add mediation or binding arbitration when City Council is unable to take action on Rules violations.

PROPOSED RULES

1. Social Media
City Council member use of social media, personal webpages and messaging boards are a First Amendment right; however, the use of these media could result in violations of these Rules, and potentially of the Brown Act. As has been decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in numerous cases, Freedom of Speech is not unlimited.

a. City Council members are prohibited from discussing or publishing any information regarding any item that is, or will be, before City Council, Commission or Board on any social media platform, message board, or personal webpage, except their official City of San Mateo webpage.

b. No City Council member shall serve or operate as a moderator, approver, lead, or any similar position that includes functions of censorship, suspension or removal of posting permissions, or removal of accounts on any social media platform.

2. Electronic Communications During Meetings

a. City Council members are prohibited from possessing or using any electronic communication device during City Council meetings unless they are city-owned and monitored as part of the city’s IT network.

b. Make public any communications received by a Council Member on an allowed device during a City Council meeting that is not automatically being displayed and memorialized for public record.

53 of 115

Ethics San Mateo - A California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation www.EthicsSanMateo.com

3. Conflicts of Interest, Financial
The California Fair Political Practices Act clearly defines financial Conflicts of Interest.

The city currently monitors the submission of Statements of Financial Interest; however, the current Guidelines state, “With full consideration of the City Attorney’s advice, it is up to each individual Council Member to decide for him/herself whether there is a conflict of interest”. The City Attorney should determine if there is a financial Conflict of Interest.
a. In addition to the requirement to file truthful reports of Economic Interests, City Council members are to follow the California Fair Political Practices Act and follow the City Attorney’s determination as to financial conflicts of interest. b. Any City Council member with a Conflict of Interest shall follow the recusal process.

4. Conflicts of Interest, General
Ethics San Mateo believes that more general conflicts of interest create bias. Bias, even if subconscious, can violate the requirement to be fair and impartial. Membership in general advocacy or support of any organization would not necessarily be evidence of bias, unless there is sufficient evidence that the council member could be biased due to their membership or support. It also would not include activity with government organizations.
a. To avoid bias in decision-making, any Council member determined to have a conflict of interest due to active membership in, alignment with, advocacy for, or is an activist with any advocacy, activist or special interest groups shall recuse themselves from discussions about and voting on any item which falls within the group’s concentration.
b. The City Attorney would review and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding a potential general conflict of interest. The City Council would decide whether the Council/Commission member has a specific conflict of interest. If the decision differs from the recommendation of the City Attorney, mediation or arbitration shall be employed to make the determination. c. Any City Council member determined to have a conflict of interest on a specific issue shall follow the recusal process.

54 of 115

Ethics San Mateo - A California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation www.EthicsSanMateo.com

5. Recusal
The definition of Recusal and procedure needs to be clarified and enforced. a. Recusal must include the removal of the subject Council member from chambers during any discussion or vote regarding the subject items. b. The subject Council member must be prohibited from discussing the item with other Council members, other city officials and staff until such time as it is no longer before Council.

6. Conduct with other members of the City Council, Commissioners, Board Members, city staff and the public.
a. Council members shall not bully, shame, attack, slander, libel, personally insult or otherwise cast aspersions on any city officials, members of city staff, or members of the public verbally or in writing, in relation to any issues before, or pending to come before, city council.

7. Serving the Entire Community
a. The City Council will govern by considering the needs and interests of the community as a whole.
b. The interests and will of the residents of San Mateo will be considered as predominant over all other entities.

55 of 115

1 Patrice Olds
From: Virginia McIsaac
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 12:05 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Suggested rules of conduct
Attachments: Proposed rules of conduct for City of San Mateo .docx Attached please find a list of my immediate thoughts on rules of conduct for both council members and commissioners.

Hopefully you'll find it useful.

Best Regards
Virginia McIsaac

56 of 115

• Treat each other with dignity and respect at all times. • Respect the various political views and opinions of everyone in attendance of council and commission meetings.
• Refrain from engaging in activities or actions that would reflect poorly on city government.
• Avoid disrupting speakers or presenters during sessions and meetings. • Prohibit unlawful discrimination, harassment or retaliation • Acknowledge any conflict of interest with any item brought forward for review and remove yourself from any judicial determinations. • Focus on Productive Dialogue
• Work for the common good, not personal interest;
• Provide transparency regarding components of council/commission decisions.
•

57 of 115

From: Lisa Taner
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Did Someone Say Oversight?
Date: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 12:16:16 PM
Dear City Council,
After all the gaslighting that went on from the mayor's seat last night, what a timely piece of news to reflect on. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/9-supreme-court-justices-push-back- oversight-raises/story?id=98917921&fbclid=IwAR2LTC-
X8H9ivPnb315E5d8T4n1A6HU2HSxZfU00SFkbnWgg3lepOTqSwz4
We can choose one of two directions: CLEAN UP CITY HALL and rise to the level of integrity and transparency that can be a model for our region, regain public respect and do the real work of the people OR leave the public faith shattered with the exception of those who support 'anything goes' behaviors, 'move on' with nothing fixed and continue to plummet.

The stage is all yours.

Lisa Taner

58 of 115

59 of 115

60 of 115

61 of 115

62 of 115

63 of 115

64 of 115

65 of 115

66 of 115

67 of 115

68 of 115

69 of 115

70 of 115

71 of 115

72 of 115

73 of 115

74 of 115

75 of 115

76 of 115

77 of 115

78 of 115

79 of 115

80 of 115

81 of 115

82 of 115

83 of 115

84 of 115

85 of 115

86 of 115

87 of 115

88 of 115

89 of 115

90 of 115

91 of 115

92 of 115

93 of 115

94 of 115

95 of 115

96 of 115

97 of 115

98 of 115

99 of 115

100 of 115

101 of 115

102 of 115

103 of 115

THE FOLLOWING

PUBLIC COMMENTS

WERE SUBMITTED

AFTER THE

PUBLICATION OF THE
PACKET

104 of 115

From: Robert Whitehair
To: City Council (San Mateo); Clerk
Subject: Special Meeting Monday Feb 5
Date: Sunday, February 4, 2024 1:21:57 PM
Mayor and Council
Thank you for placing on the agenda a discussion about the way in which council members will relate to each other.

I prefer the description "guidelines" to remain. Naming them "Rules and Regulations" implies that some city staffer or appointed/elected official will actively review and enforce those rules and regulations. For the residents of San Mateo like me, it is important that Council Members continue to commit to work with each other in a civil manner. Rules and regulations will actually work against that behavior.

I also recommend that the newly written guidelines apply to all Commissions and Boards, especially the way and order in which questions are asked by commission and board members. It has been my experience that questioning can take more than an hour, or even longer; this is unfair to residents who wish to speak, forced to wait late at night. Moving the order is helpful.

I also hear through the grapevine that some members of the community wish to create a formal ethics commission, or establish such a committee within the council.

Either is a waste of
time.

This council is ethical; an ethics committee might be a solution in search of a problem.

Robert Whitehair, San Mateo

105 of 115

From: Michael
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Cc: Patrice Olds
Subject: 2024 Blue Sky Comments
Date: Friday, February 2, 2024 11:48:40 AM
Greetings Mayor Nash and Members of the Council -
For this year's Blue Sky meetings, I think it's important that the council prioritize establishing a code of conduct for council members, as well as minimum residency durations to be eligible for council or commissions. Over the last few years, we've seen an alarming uptick in questionable, unethical, even flat-out illegal behavior by councilmembers and commissioners alike, and we currently have no robust mechanisms to protect our city from these bad actors.

We've also seen several instances of candidates being planted in districts to maintain a majority in favor of special interests. Our elections are not some game to be played by monied outsiders trying to manipulate policy outcomes to their benefit.

Specifically:
- Lower the voting threshold to 3 votes to remove a commissioner - Develop a robust code of conduct that
calls for the discipline and removal of
councilmembers or commissioners for unethical behavior, illegal behavior, and "conduct detrimental to the city of San Mateo". Specifically, we have a council member who flat-out
lied to disqualify an excellent choice for appointment to city council. She faced zero consequences. We have a planning commissioner who admitted to stealing campaign signs in an attempt to sway a district election in favor of their preferred candidate. This same commissioner submitted a 70+ page presentation to the HCD specifically to have our housing element rejected, because he doesn't personally believe it goes far enough. He has faced zero consequences. We have another planning commissioner who has routinely shown her disdain for residents with differing opinions from her own and has also tried to get the HCD to reject our housing element. She has faced zero consequences.
- For more information, Ethics San Mateo has crafted a compelling statement of position that the city should take a hard look at. -
https://ethicssanmateo.com/wp-
content/uploads/2024/01/SOP-2024-1-Conflicts-of-Interest-Activism-and-Standards-for- Ethical-Conduct.pdf
- Require candidates and commissioners to reside in their district for a minimum of 1 year before being eligible.

I would also like the city to prioritize a complete historic assets inventory. Our historic downtown and neighborhoods are what make San Mateo unique and desirable, and without a better understanding of what is there, we can't take concrete steps to protect them before they disappear. Please don't let San Mateo become just another generic dot on the map.

Thanks for listening - Michael Weinhauer

106 of 115

P.O. Box 6764
San Mateo CA 94403

February 2, 2024

SAN MATEO CITY COUNCIL
Via Email

Re: Support for Ethics San Mateo Council/Commissioner
Code of Conduct Recommendations

Dear City Council,

The Board of the Beresford Hillsdale Neighborhood Association advocates for strong improvements to the current broad and imprecise City Council Code of Conduct.

These improvements should provide specific clarity of expectations, repercussions for failure to meet expectations and a clear path of means to remove an offending Councilmember. Further, it is our express interest that a revised, robust Code of Conduct also apply to appointed commissioners as they serve San Mateans, too, and should be held to the same high standard.

We thereby support and champion the recommendations submitted by Ethics San Mateo in an endeavor to strengthen and create real, positive change to the Code of Conduct and, with its implementation, to our elected and appointed representatives, thereby resulting in a beneficial effect on the entirety of our community and city.

Sincerely,

The Board of the
Beresford Hillsdale Neighborhood Association

cc: Patrice Olds

107 of 115

From: Laurie Strange
To: Alex Khojikian
Cc: Patrice Olds
Subject: FW: Code of Conduct Feedback & Ethics Enforcement Date: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 11:38:05 AM

From: Amy Jussel, Shaping Youth
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 11:35 AM
To: Lisa Diaz Nash <[email protected]>; City Mgr <[email protected]>; City Attorney's Office <[email protected]> Subject: Code of Conduct Feedback & Ethics Enforcement

All: As you are aware, I was forwarded the Boards & Commissions guidelines via the city clerk sent without comment from a recent incident w/a sitting planning commissioner, and replied that they were in effect useless sans enforcement/policy pieces that detail ramifications when a breach of same occurs. With that in mind, to be productive rather than punitive with the abhorrent conduct recently endured as a private citizen in the aforementioned slander incident I have summarized a few areas requiring elevated clarity as you address tightening the loopholes and setting forth policy that adheres to decency and professionalism befitting a city such as ours. (Under separate cover, I will attach a 7pg pdf of my futile attempt to resolve the miscommunication with said parties while I decide what actions to take as next steps. I outreached to them for a week, to no avail as they refused to submit any concrete data addressing allegations. Conversely, I offered full forensic evidence negating said allegations,
including access to all phone/computer/digital records. Needless to say, it is a lopsided effort of good faith.)
With that in mind, I offer the following to shore up expectations of the code of conduct:

1.) BEFORE SERVING ON A COMMISSION/COUNCIL --APPLICATION PHASE:
a.) Applicant must detail any/all fiscal, familial, organizational, advocacy/activism/lobbying and special interest tethers as well as donations to political and organizational entities per tax code stipulations. (could even mandate last two years of tax returns outlining same) b.) Applicant should reveal w/full transparency any data at the onset for any potential optics which could compromise city business via conflicts of interest, and review annually with updates in writing and verbally during city business at hand that could be impacted. This should apply NOT ONLY to financial holdings and familial stakeholders in the immediate or extended family, but ALSO to ideological pertinence and practices that could be construed as bias when votes pertain to issues of concern. (Example: Serving on a bike coalition when bike lanes/expansion are being reviewed, serving on a land use trust bumping up against environmental or energy or resource interests, receiving developer's donor dollars, local candidate donations, etc.)
c.) Applicant should sign a document acknowledging terms of city policy involving disclosure of conflict of interest and negating public discussion of any city business under review across all forums so as not to run afoul of the Brown Act.

108 of 115

d.) Applicant should provide detailed transparency while also knowing that it does not negate service, nor necessarily mandate recusal on a given vote, it simply means the applicant should indicate vested interests and any conflicts which could be construed upfront and verbally indicate same each and every time key matters come before the city, by referencing the written disclosures in the application, keeping them updated annually while serving on said commission. (Objectivity is the focal point here, erring on the side of recusal when voting on a project that has political/ideological/fiscal alliances or serving on boards or in volunteer organizational positions where stakeholders are key and reviewing in HR or hearing style if there is a challenge to said objectivity.)

2.) WHILE SERVING ON A COMMISSION:
a.) Commissioner Conduct: Item 1, letters A&B allude to the notion of putting personal interests aside and treating members of the public with dignity, but there is no consequence for NOT doing so in the current 'guidelines' and the city's code of conduct has been REPEATEDLY and brazenly violated ad nauseum in recent years. Add an enforcement policy that states specifics, such as: If a commissioner slanders, slurs or creates controversy in the form of any sort of defamation to a private citizen or on either public or private social media channels that subject the city to liability, said commissioner should be subject to immediate dismissal by the city attorney's office, following presentation of data/review of concrete evidence of same. Further, any allegations of any kind must be substantiated by evidentiary data submitted directly to the party being accused (whether city official or public or private figure) and reviewed promptly in writing with a reply and course of action by the city attorney. (hearings/challenges could be considered but not over-ruled by appointees or council)
b.) Conflict of Interest: Item 13/pp 16-17 Obviously, items A-G on recusal need beefed up, particularly pertaining to the Planning Commission item 14 A-H items with much tighter verbiage extending beyond financial conflicts of interest to extend to ideological/organizational and Item E needs tossed altogether, "With full consideration of the City Attorney's advice, it is up to each individual Commissioner to decide for themselves whether there is a conflict of interest."
What? That lack of policy underpinning is screaming
for abuse and needs codified fully! Perhaps try something like: If a commissioner listed vested interests/potential conflicts on their initial application and a vote comes before the city where any portion could be construed as ideological, fiscal or familial stakeholder bias, the city attorney will consult the vested interests of any said commissioner and recuse by default unless challenged by the commissioner via removal of the conflict which was not reflected in an updated version of the initial disclosures.
c.) Brown Act/Media Use: p.25 Prohibited Uses: We have multiple violations of Item A2 in this slack channel with a wide array of commissioners and lobbyists conducting side business opinions via gossip/innunendo under the guise of it being a 'private vs public' platform...Specific verbiage needs expanded and clarified to cover ALL media and ALL platforms, public or private which should not be convening w/any form of majority to discuss city business of any kind (this is just like an HOA who can't pass legislation via email w/o violation) I'd suggest adapting current terminology to reflect something like, "A majority of the members may not use social media, or public or private platforms of any kind to curry favor or express views which may elicit influence or bias; this includes email threads and texts to discuss agency business while not in active session, nor may they share their views in media publications swaying influence of any kind, nor may any member respond directly to any

109 of 115

posting on any platform by another member regarding agency business including no 'likes, thumbs up, emojis or other symbols, as this is to be considered a direct violation of the Brown Act, subject to removal of the appointee."

3.) BEST PRACTICES
a.) When the public requests a response from the attorney, city manager, council or other seated official concerning commission authority or a complaint therein, the reply should come from the official(s) cited, in writing, to officially state the stance of the city. Delegating a 'forward' sans response from the city clerk is not sufficient, given the purpose of the commission authority, per Chapter 2 item A is as follows: "The primary role of City commissions is to increase public input and participation in the determination of City policies and some programs."

b.) Public records requests are deemed to include any/all material pertaining to city officials serving and need to be upheld with utmost transparency and prioritization and all platforms and channels are subject to public access withing the state's given time period. Perhaps add a clause like, The city can abbreviate/limit the requested items in order to expedite but needs to do so in writing in a timely manner with explanation of intent (e.g. If records are voluminous, they can start with a rolling data dump to expedite, etc. for example, I requested data 11/27 and still have not received same, tho I was informed the lag is due to staffing/computer issues etc. so abbreviated the request. Though this still remains out of compliance and obviously needs more people power to serve effectively, the outreach from the city clerk prevented escalation and community pushback, helping considerably to give voice to the city stance. (the public has a right to access projects under scrutiny to report back to their communities of concerns writ large in a timely manner, the city clerk helped facilitate a compromise via communication)
These are just some basic suggestions for tightening the guidelines in an effort to clarify and codify conduct and expectations for the benefit of all. Hope they are found to be productive to remedy some of the loopholes in the current document. Thank you.

Respectfully submitted,
Amy Jussel
District 4/MGA#1

110 of 115

should re

111 of 115

From: San Mateo United Homeowners Association
To: City Council (San Mateo); Patrice Olds
Subject: Special Meeting #1 City Council Guidelines
Date: Monday, February 5, 2024 2:39:16 PM
Dear Mayor Diaz Nash and City Council:

SMU is writing to request refinement and improvement to City Rules and Guidelines for City Council and Commissions.

One of the many things that makes San Mateo a thriving active community is the engagement of its citizens and electorate. While there is disagreement there has always been open-mindedness toward the view of others.

We request council consider making the following changes:

1. Commissioners limit their city email use to internal city communication only. Outside City communications other than to say thank you or acknowledge the receipt and an Email that has been referred to city staff is strictly prohibited and grounds for immediate removal from their commission.

2. No elected or appointed person may perform a non-emergency task that would otherwise be performed by city staff. Council and commission members should report the task to the City Manager, or appropriate department head for appropriate action. Failure to follow proper protocol should result in immediate dismissal.

3. Treat all community comments with respect and interest, without vocalizing or exhibiting bias toward any position or policy before hearing all input.

4. The current decorum of not interrupting, silencing, or being rude/negative regarding another representative, whether Council or Commissioner, must be strictly observed.

5. Council or commission members shall refrain from asking leading questions to a consultant or presenter who is presenting to obtain approval for a project or job.

6. Review minimum attendance requirements, except for medical or family emergencies.

Missing difficult or uncomfortable meetings to avoid representing the people and/or participating in a council vote is not a valid excuse for missing the meeting.

7. Swear an oath to the (new) code of conduct for both council and commissioners.

8. Clearly define commissioner roles as advisory only, with the understanding they are not to advocate. Commissioners should refrain from attempting to educate staff or the public.

All questions must be referred to city staff for answers.

9. Representatives shall support staff immediately at public meetings when public meeting attendees act outside of the rules of decorum.

112 of 115

113 of 115

From: Lisa Taner
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Cc: Patrice Olds
Subject: Suggestions for Code of Conduct (& Procedures) Date: Friday, February 2, 2024 11:26:18 AM
In regard to a complete revamping of our current and unserviceable Code of Conduct, while I support the recommendations set forth by Ethics San Mateo, I would like to include some specific suggestions for the Code of Conduct and its accompanying procedures.

The following are in no particular order:

1. The request or need for an apology from a councilmember or commissioner, when fulfilled, must be done so by the offending party, not by any other elected or appointed representative or City staff.

2. The current decorum of not interrupting, silencing, or being rude/negative in regard to another representative, whether Council or Commissioner, must be strictly observed.

3. No council member should tee up a question to a consultant or presenter who is presenting to obtain approval for a project or job in order that said consultant or presenter may supply a canned answer for their next possible bid/job.

4. A minimum attendance should be required except in medical or family emergencies. Missing difficult or uncomfortable meetings to avoid representing the people and/or participating in a council vote is not an excuse for missing the meeting.

5. Swear an oath to (new) code of conduct for
both council and commissioners

6. No commissioner may write a letter or communicate to agencies, organizations or the state, or the representatives of such bodies, especially from their City email address, advocating or condemning City matters which are currently before the City or have been submitted by the City for approval.

7. Clearly define commissioner roles as advisory only, with the understanding they are not to advocate.

8. Representatives shall support staff immediately at public meetings when public meeting attendees act outside of the rules of decorum.

9. No elected or appointed person may touch campaign signs that do not belong to them for any reason without consent of the candidate.

10. Increase the efforts of decorum and civility by striking rude comments expressed by a councilmember/commissioner in regard to another councilmember/commissioner during a City meeting should the offended party request it.

11. Clearly define steps for removal when the revised Code of Conduct is broken.

114 of 115

12. Review method of removal to strengthen the integrity of the process so that it is not not clouded by relationships or political gain.

Thank you,
Lisa Taner

115 of 115