Central Park
MASTER PLAN UPDATE
MAY 2017
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
MASTER PLAN UPDATE
CENTRAL PARK
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
PREPARED BY:
SAN MATEO CITY COUNCIL
David Lim Mayor
Rick Bonilla Deputy Mayor
Maureen Freschet Council Member
Joe Goethals Council Member
Diane Papan Council Member
Larry Patterson City Manager
Sheila Canzian Director of Parks and Recreation
Abby Veeser Business Manager
SAN MATEO PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION
Mike Etheridge Commissioner
Eric Holm Chair
Chris Massey Commissioner
Stan Watkins Commissioner
Sean Williams Vice Chair
RRM DESIGN GROUP
Jeff Ferber Principal
Amy McKay Senior Designer
Marisa Peltier Designer
Anna Schmitz Associate Designer
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
TOC
1 INTRODUCTION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
01 02
04 7
Purpose
Background &
History
Project Setting &
Site Description
2 DESIGN PROCESS
Public Outreach
Goals & Objectives
Concept Alternatives
09 22
23 3 FINAL MASTER PLAN
Final Master Plan
El Camino Real Frontage
Central Park Core
Laurel & 5th Avenue Frontage
35 39
42 46
4 ART, INTERPRETATION
& EDUCATION
Designing the Interpretive
Experience of Central Park
59 5
PHASING &
IMPLEMENTATION
Critical Path
Phasing
65 66
ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MAY 2017
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
MAY 2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Central Park is perhaps the most treasured and visited public place in San Mateo. It is valued by City residents as a place to stroll, exercise, spend time with friends and family, or attend a community event.
This master plan update represents the vision for the park for the coming years, until circumstances and City needs warrant the next master plan update. The direction of the plan was guided by much community input, ensuring the park will remain the scenic gem that it is today.
While the plan respects and enhances the historic character and qualities of Central Park, it also proposes new features, and refinements to some key elements and facilities. The most beloved places in the park will be preserved including the following features:
• Japanese Garden
• Kohl Pump House and Historic Kohl Fence
• Rose Garden & Dog Statue
• Concert/ Event Lawn
• Park Forest
• Fitzgerald Field
When fully implemented, the planned improvements will result in Central Park having a better visual and pedestrian connection to downtown, increased space for flexible community use and events, and a greater emphasis on the park’s role as the City’s gathering place for the residents. The projects illustrated and described in the master plan will likely be phased over a number of years to accommodate continued use of the park during construction and be linked to available funding.
These projects range from new facilities to renovations and relocations of park amenities. • Central Park Plaza on 5th Avenue
• New Event- oriented Community Building near Plaza
• New San Mateo Rotary Picnic/Event Pavilion adjacent to Japanese Garden and Event Lawn
• Remodel of Fitzgerald Field Bleachers
• Renovated Children’s Play Area
• Addition of New Group and Individual Picnic Areas
• Designates location for Fallen Heroes Memorial
• Relocates 3 Tennis Courts to Southern end of park & 3 Courts to other City parks
• New Restroom Buildings
1INTRODUCTION
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
MAY 2017
1INTRODUCTION
1 PURPOSE
The Central Park Master Plan Update is intended to provide the City of San Mateo with a framework for future improvements and redevelopment projects within the park. This document catalogs the extensive public feedback that was received during the process, describes the design approach that the City and consultants used to develop a preferred Master Plan, and lays out a plan for future enhancements to this highly valued park space. With consideration for the site’s historic character and well-established urban forest, as well as its adjacency to Downtown San Mateo, this Master Plan works to strike a balance between community gathering space and both active and passive recreation opportunities.
Historic Kohl Pumphouse inside Central Park
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 BACKGROUND & HISTORY
Purchased by the City in 1922, Central Park is San Mateo’s first municipal park. The 16.3-acre site is a significant space to the community due to its location, size, history and variety of amenities.
Over the years it has adapted and been upgraded according to the needs of San Mateo’s residents.
The most recent master plan was completed in 1982, and although some of those recommended improvements were implemented, it no longer addresses the park’s current or future needs. A significant goal identified by the community during the intervening years is improving the connection to Downtown San Mateo, both physically and visually.
In 2004 the interface between the park and downtown was the subject of a community design charette or study.
The 2002 Community Facilities & Programs Strategic Plan identified Central Park as significant to residents and visitors of San Mateo, and developed the following list of design objectives:
View of mature trees at Central Park.
MAY 2017
1INTRODUCTION
3 1. Maximize the park’s open space and historic nature
2. Improve the visual image and sense of open space along the Fifth Avenue frontage
3. Improve the integration of physical structures within the park, e.g. garage, grandstands, buildings, and tennis courts
4. Enhance the park’s value as a link to downtown in support of downtown vitality and economic development
5. Support the park’s function as a community gathering space
6. Facilitate the park’s use to support community special events, especially cultural performances and events
Ensuring the preservation of mature landscaping along with incorporating sustainable design principles were also determined to be objectives that should help guide the master plan.
Central Park signage and historic Kohl fencing along El Camino Real
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
1 INTRODUCTION
4 82
92 EL CAMINO REAL
CENTRAL PARK
101
CITY OF
SAN MATEO
PROJECT SETTING & SITE DESCRIPTION
When the City of San Mateo first purchased Central Park, the original Kohl Mansion still stood on the property and was used as a junior college until 1927, when the home was razed. The historic Kohl Pumphouse, built in the late 1800’s, still stands on the site, however, along with the signature Kohl fence and a cast-iron dog sculpture from the original estate. The community has grown to value and cherish these historic features that are set amongst established gardens and mature trees. Central Park’s unique location, adjacent to residential neighborhoods as well as Downtown San Mateo, creates an atmosphere that supports large community events while also providing spaces for active and passive recreation as well as intimate family gatherings.
Project location map.
MAY 2017
1INTRODUCTION
5 The park is home to horticulturally significant trees and plantings. The established and mature urban forest that originated with the Kohl Estate truly makes the park a respite from visitor’s busy lives and is the one of the most prominent and characteristic features of the park. The Japanese Garden, established Azalea and Rhododendron collections, Rose Garden and Fern Grove are valued botanical features that contribute to the park’s unique personality.
Central Park, 2014.
LAUREL AVENUE
EL CAMINO REAL
5TH AVENUE
9TH AVENUE
NORTH
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
2DESIGN PROCESS
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
2DESIGN PROCESS
9 MAY 2017
PUBLIC OUTREACH
City Parks and Recreation Department Staff and RRM Design Group (RRM) prepared an outline of the various meetings, workshops and focus groups that would be the means for conducting an open and effective dialog with the community about the future vision for Central Park. With the goal of obtaining as much input as possible from park users within a transparent public process, the focus was on creating as many opportunities, in as many ways possible, to reach out and connect with the public. This outreach process wasn’t limited to face to face encounters, but also considered the busy lives of locals in a technological age. Project information and meeting notifications were posted across three on-line media platforms; a Central Park Master Plan Update web page within the City’s website, the San Mateo Town Hall site by Mind Mixer, and a Central Park Master Plan Update Facebook page. To help folks access these sites, various pieces of collateral were created throughout the outreach process. Posters were made to alert park users of upcoming meetings and included web addresses to access the on-line information as well as a QR Code for quick connection. Each public meeting offered attendees take-home information in the form of a ‘business card’ , featuring the Facebook page address and project logo. Postcard meeting notices were also created and mailed to residents for several of the meetings and included social media access information. This on-line presence, together with the more traditional public workshops and focus groups, created a varied set of opportunities for park users to participate, and therefore, a well-rounded assortment of input from the public at large.
STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS
On February 10 and 11, 2014, RRM conducted a series of fifteen stakeholder interviews regarding the Master Plan update. The purpose of this exercise was to gain an insight into the perspectives, desires and concerns of a wide range of stakeholders and City officials. The stakeholders, selected by the City, were chosen to represent the primary user groups of the park, and other groups or organizations that had an informed perspective and a vested interest in the outcome of the Master Plan. A complete list of these stakeholders can be found in the Central Park Master Plan Update Appendix, Section A.
The following summary provides a sense of the overall trends, themes and priorities that emerged throughout the course of the meetings.
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
2 DESIGN PROCESS
10 OVERALL VISION FOR CENTRAL PARK
Opinions about Central Park clearly expressed that it is a highly valued and treasured community asset for the historic character and location. Several people noted how precious the open space is to a dense urban area, and that they would not like to see any reduction in green space. One stakeholder thought that improving the park should be the City’s “grand vision” , implying that big ideas should be considered. Another offered this vision statement – the park should be a “vibrant, vital and engaging multi-functional gathering place for our community.” Yet another likened the park to the “city’s backyard” , just as the library is its living room. Finally, another stated: “It’s a good park.
But it could be a spectacular park.”
RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARK TO DOWNTOWN SAN MATEO
The need to strengthen the connection between the park and downtown, particularly the 5th Avenue edge, was a recurring concept, and was highly supported by almost everyone. It was noted that the park was an important visual node at the end of downtown, and both the visual and physical connection needed improvement. Other comments that reinforced this perception included “5th Avenue corridor feels closed off,” and the “park has struggled to connect with the downtown.” 5TH AVENUE CORRIDOR
The 5th Avenue corridor was a topic of much discussion, as it is seen as a critical component in connecting the park to the downtown business district. Several ideas were brought forward to address this element. It was generally agreed that the tennis courts and ball field bleachers formed a visual and physical barrier to the park. The location of the tennis courts especially, on the visual axis at the end of South San Mateo Drive, was identified as a critical node. Ideas for this location included a new community center with underground parking, or a large plaza (e.g. Redwood City Courthouse Square) that would serve as a civic gathering place. Other suggestions were to treat the streetscape as a part of the park, and allow for the street to be closed off for street fairs. The proposed residential project located across 5th Avenue was also discussed, and people were curious about how it might interface with the park and streetscape.
PARKING
Parking emerged as a primary concern. There was general agreement that parking is a necessity, both for the park and the downtown core. However, there was also a reluctance to lose park space to paved parking. There seemed to be a general consensus that the current total number of spaces should be retained, if not increased. Constructing underground parking was suggested, in order to create more space above (such as for a plaza). If there were to be a new parking garage (below grade or otherwise) it should be well designed: “prestigious parking to match a prestigious park.” 2DESIGN PROCESS
11 MAY 2017
COMMUNITY CENTER
The current lessee of the Community Center, Self-Help for the Elderly, occupies the building on week- days and offers a variety of programs and social services to people that are both local and from neighboring cities. Almost everyone supported their mission, although some questioned whether Central Park is the best location for this use. Several people indicated they thought the center was underutilized for City programs. There were also several big ideas that involved either relocating the building to a more prominent location or expanding it to offer a greater variety of amenities, such as a teen center, and other indoor recreation. Suggested locations for a new community center building included at the end of South San Mateo Drive (where the tennis courts are), at the corner of 5th and Laurel, and mid-block on Laurel. Several stakeholders referenced the library as a benchmark for significant civic architecture that would be appropriate for a new community/rec center.
The consideration of the future of the Central Park Community Center and what type of facility would best serve the Park, launched a re-initiation of the Recreation Facilities Strategic Plan that originally began in the early 2000’s. This effort was aimed at establishing a clear road-map and broad vision for the recreation facilities City-wide, including all recreation structures - community buildings, recreation centers and pools. It’s original momentum was stalled by fiscal challenges occurring at that time, but there was still a need for a long-term plan to help guide future improvements and expansions in order to meet the recreational needs of the community while also providing cost recovery measures for the operation of the City’s facilities. Sparked by the City Council’s May 2015 study session of Central Park and this master plan, the Department of Parks and Recreation developed the Recreation Facilities Strategic Plan in 2016.
CENTRAL LAWN
The central lawn is a popular area, and home to the Central Park Music Series. It functions well in its current state, but there were a few ideas for enhancing it. A potential feature that was suggested by a couple of stakeholders was a permanent stage structure with infrastructure (power, audio) to make concert logistics more efficient. Opinion was divided about making the lawn bigger: some thought the size is a perfect, intimate scale, while others thought a modest expansion towards the playground or the community center would provide greater flexibility for events.
VEHICULAR CIRCULATION
Most of the paths in the park are wide enough for both pedestrian and vehicular traffic. However, there are some limitations on vehicular access and circulation that some stakeholders would like
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
2 DESIGN PROCESS
12 to see addressed. These included widening the 9th Avenue entry, and making the driveway off Laurel (adjacent to the senior apartment building) more accessible for larger vehicles such as fire engines or delivery trucks. Currently the park is typically accessed from 5th Avenue, and making these improvements would provide one or more ingress/egress points to improve flow and functionality.
There is also some concern about the potential conflict between pedestrians and vehicles within park (e.g., cars driving to the pump house).
FITZGERALD FIELD
Not surprisingly, we heard contrasting opinions about the ball-field. On one hand, there is clearly a nostalgic fondness for the facility and its charm; several of the stakeholders played baseball there in their youth, and one stated “it’s the favorite ball-field in town.” Because of its small size and skinned infield, the field is currently used more for adult softball than for baseball, although some teams still use the field for practice and occasional baseball games. On the other hand, we heard comments such as “the ball-field occupies a disproportionate amount of space relative to its users,” and that a ball-field is “not the highest and best use for a central park.” There were suggestions about reducing the size of the bleachers, and rotating the field so that the outfield could be conveniently shared for other park uses.
The outfield is also currently used as an off-leash dog area, and for occasional festivals/special events - both ideas that were generally supported.
TENNIS COURTS
The six (6) tennis courts are used by the public and a third-party contractor, who utilizes the courts and a small office behind the ceramic studio. All agreed that the courts are in poor condition. Similarly to Fitzgerald Field, we heard divergent opinions about the courts. Some thought the courts should be moved to another site altogether because they occupy a large amount of space and are visually obtrusive. Others thought they could be relocated within the park to open up the 5th Avenue corridor.
Supporters of the tennis courts like the downtown location because it offers workers the opportunity for easy lunchtime recreation, and they generally add vibrancy and life to the park. According to the vendor, four (4) courts is the minimum number necessary to operate a tennis program, but seven (7) would be optimal because it is the best number for running tournaments. It is also desirable to make smaller “10-and-Under” courts for teaching kids – this can be achieved by striping a half-sized court perpendicular to the adult court lines.
PLAYGROUND
Only a few comments were made about the playground. One stakeholder thought there was too much “dead space.” Others were in favor of a significant upgrade to make it a “huge…destination playground” .
2DESIGN PROCESS
13 MAY 2017
PUBLIC WORKSHOPS & FOCUS GROUPS
The purpose of public outreach for the CPMPU was to receive feedback and input from Park users by engaging them in a meaningful, friendly and creative manner that encourages involvement and makes them feel comfortable participating in the process. The CPMPU involved three public workshops and three public focus group meetings. Workshop #1 was intended to discover, through discussion, the key goals and objectives to inspire the Master Plan Update, as well as key features that were most important to the community. RRM then conducted three focus group meetings which were intended to generate ideas and uncover concerns on the following areas; the 5th Avenue park edge, the 9th Avenue & Laurel Avenue edges, and the Children’s Play Area. Workshop #2 brought the community back to discover the way in which their input contributed to the creation of three alternative master plan designs, and for their assistance in choosing a preferred alternative to move forward. RRM also held a pop-up style event called ‘Day in the Park’ , which provided park users additional opportunities to view and comment on the alternatives. Workshop #3, held in several sessions, provided park users with the opportunity to view the Preferred Plan, as it was presented to the City of San Mateo Parks and Recreation department, City Council, Park and Recreation Commission, and the Design Review Boards, and to hear an explanation of the project’s design process and environmental review, while also allowing for public comment.
The following section describes in more detail the process and outcome of each public outreach event. All materials used at the public meetings can be found in the Appendix section of this document.
WORKSHOP #1 - CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
On March 25, 2014, City staff and RRM facilitated the first public workshop with San Mateo residents at the Central Recreation Center in Central Park. Approximately 70 people were in attendance, including staff. A presentation of background information, and opportunities and constraints was made, and general questions were taken and answered. Following this, the workshop attendees split into five ‘break-out’ groups and were then led through a brainstorming session to identify two basic elements:
The goals and objectives (vision) and a list of desirable features (program) for Central Park. Ideas were written on flip-charts, and then participants were asked to place colored sticker dots on those ideas that were a priority. It was made clear that this dot exercise was not a popular vote, but rather that it would be used to generally gauge community consensus. The results of the dot exercise are summarized in Tables 1 and 2 of the Appendix.
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
2 DESIGN PROCESS
14 FOCUS GROUP #1 - 5TH AVENUE EDGE
On April 9, 2014, City staff and RRM facilitated the first Focus Group meeting at the Central Recreation Center in Central Park. Approximately 65 people were in attendance. An overview of the first workshop was presented for the benefit of those who were not able to attend Workshop #1. RRM then explained to those in attendance that the intent of this focus group was to generate ideas that would strengthen the connection of Central Park to Downtown San Mateo. As in Workshop #1, this was done with a brainstorming exercise, and followed by a prioritization opportunity in which participants used a sticker dot to note the comments they most supported. There was also an optional magnet board activity that allowed attendees to explore the effects of moving Park features on the 5th Avenue edge to other areas of the Park.
Throughout the evening, attendees were encouraged to review the large body of creative work produced by volunteers during the 2004 5th Avenue Charette organized by the San Mateo chapter of the AIA. RRM identified nine (9) concepts represented in the schematic plans and illustrations prepared and asked Focus Group participants to prioritize the concepts that they thought best accomplished the goal of strengthening the connection between Central Park and Downtown.
The results of the prioritization exercises are summarized in Tables 3, 4 and 5 of the Appendix.
FOCUS GROUP #2 - LAUREL AVENUE & 9TH AVENUE
The following evening, April 10, 2014, San Mateo residents were invited to the second of three focus group meetings to discuss the Laurel Avenue & 9th Avenue relationship with the Park. As with the previous public meetings, a brainstorming exercise was conducted to find out “What We Need to Know” , from the perspective of those living adjacent to or in the Laurel and 9th neighborhoods.
Approximately 30 people were in attendance, and the goal was to discover ideas and/or concerns that nearby residents may have had about the future of Central Park in relationship to their home environment. The comments resulting from the brainstorming exercise are summarized in Table 6 of the Appendix.
2DESIGN PROCESS
15 MAY 2017
Focus Group #1:
Participants explore the relocation of Park features.
Focus Group #1:
An attendee brainstorming on the Park aerial with RRM.
Focus Group #1:
The 2004 5th Avenue Charette Boards were on display.
Focus Group #1:
The priority-setting exercise took place after the brainstorming session.
Workshop #1:
City Staff and RRM facilitates the brainstorming exercises with one of the five break-out groups.
Workshop #1:
Participants place their sticker dots on their top priority ideas.
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
2 DESIGN PROCESS
16 DOWNTOWN SAN MATEO ASSOCIATION MEETING (DSMA)
On May 1, 2014, City staff and RRM made a presentation to members of the DSMA in their offices in downtown. The purpose of the meeting was to provide an overview of the Master Plan and public outreach process and supplement the participation by the community regarding the issue of improving the connection and relationship between Central Park and the Downtown. The DSMA members shared opinions and ideas while participating in a survey prepared for use during the May 3rd Focus Group workshop and subsequently posted on the City’s Town Hall website.
FOCUS GROUP #3 - CHILDREN’S PLAY AREA
On May 3, 2014, City staff and RRM set-up camp on the edge of the children’s playground in Central Park to engage parents and children in exercises and discussions about the future of the play environment and park as a whole. Over a span of four (4) hours, the drop-by format provided an audience of park users in their natural habitat. Morning and afternoon hours on a Saturday also expanded the demographic for the master plan outreach effort. Kids were led by our junior park planners (our kids) in a quest to determine the best play experiences. The children were given sticker dots and asked to place them on the photos of playgrounds and structures that they would like to see in Central Park. While they were busy, parents, friends, and grandparents answered questions about related topics and a written survey was available that was born of the input received during the previous community meetings. Approximately 45-50 kids spent time expressing their emerging design thoughts, and nearly 50 adults completed a survey and also gave input on the future play environment.
When presented with a range of photographs depicting various play environments and features, kids and parents alike showed a high level of interest in a natural play environment and water play features. Also getting strong support were the type of environments that include towers and climbing features. In addition to prioritizing the type of play concept they favored, visitors shared specific comments and suggestions on a range of playground issues including safety and visibility, fencing, seating arrangements, bathrooms, surfacing, and other amenities that make a playground a better experience for the children and families.
2DESIGN PROCESS
17 MAY 2017
Focus Group #3:
RRM & City Staff engaging with park users during the Children’s Play Area Focus Group meeting.
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
2 DESIGN PROCESS
18 WORKSHOP #2
Based on community and City feedback from the focus groups and the first workshop, RRM developed a set of objectives and planning concepts that served as a design guide for the Master Plan. During Workshop #2, held in duplicate on January 8 and 10, 2015, RRM presented three alternative concept plans for discussion and review to over 150 participants. A brief overview of the public outreach process thus far helped workshop attendees see how public input had informed the concept alternatives.
DOT EXERCISE
Before the end of the public meetings on January 8th and 10th, participants were asked to give feedback on the alternative designs. Each participant was given a large sticker dot and a small sticker dot. They were asked to place their large dot on the option that overall, represented the best and highest use for Central Park. The small dot was used in the case that a participant was having trouble choosing, and so could use this smaller sticker for their second choice. The majority of participants preferred Option #1, Recreation Center Option. Feedback from participants indicated their desire to continue the programs of the Self Help for the Elderly that are hosted in the existing Recreation Center.
PARK CONCEPTS SURVEY
Attendees were also given a survey to complete. This survey was intended to help further develop the vision for Central Park, and individuals were asked to consider each design element or amenity separately from their preferred overall design option. They were also encouraged to write additional comments and suggestions on the back of the survey. The survey asked questions about varying features in the park; Baseball Field Area, 5th Avenue Frontage, Children’s Play Area, Picnic Facilities, Dog Park, Art & Educational Experiences, Surface Parking and Tennis Courts.
Of those surveyed, 54% of participants supported keeping the ball field. 81% supported the building of a new recreation center on 5th Avenue. 71% of attendees thought the Children’s Play area should be redesigned, have an expanded train line and an adjacent family picnic area. 61% of surveyors supported the relocation of the existing Rotary picnic area elsewhere in the park in order to remove vehicular traffic from the internal park paths. 66% liked the idea of a fenced dog park on Laurel Avenue, and the majority of surveyors supported incorporating art and interpretive experiences throughout the park. New angled parking on Laurel Avenue was generally supported and the results were split on where tennis courts should be located. Combined, 62% supported the moving the courts to either Beresford Park or Bay Meadows Park. 8% were in favor of them moving to Bayside Joinville Park, while 30% of those surveyed supported keeping the tennis courts in Central Park. 2DESIGN PROCESS
19 MAY 2017
RRM subsequently studied how tennis might remain in Central Park based on the developed alternatives. Consideration was given for placing two to three courts in the following locations, which were chosen based on the least impact they would have on existing trees. • In the current Rotary Picnic area location
• Incorporated into the rear of the plaza proposed for 5th Avenue • In the current Recreation Center location
After careful review of these studies by Parks and Recreation staff, City Council and the Park and Recreation Commission, and considering the public support for some tennis to remain in the park, RRM was directed to include three recreational-sized courts in the location of the existing Rotary Picnic area.
RRM presenting to attendees at Workshop #2.
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
2 DESIGN PROCESS
20 WORKSHOP #3
On January 31, 2015, RRM and City Staff held a pop-up workshop in a ‘Day in the Park’ format. The goal for this outreach effort was to engage park users who were unable to attend Workshop #2 by giving them the same opportunity to review the alternative Master Plan concepts as well as offer their preferences via the park survey. RRM spoke with 52 individuals using the park that day, who all completed a survey and enriched the depth of public feedback needed to select a preferred concept alternative. Survey results from the January 31st meeting were combined with the results from the meetings held on January 8th and 10th.
January 31, 2015 “Day in the Park” event.
2DESIGN PROCESS
21 MAY 2017
Mailers, posters and social media resources were used to reach a broader audience
OTHER OUTREACH EFFORTS
The public outreach efforts have included an extensive campaign to encourage participation in the master planning process. Reaching out via social media and the City’s website created additional opportunities for folks to get involved. Particularly for those unable to attend meetings, having on- line access to project updates, conceptual designs and requests for public feedback meant that the project team heard from a more extensive set of voices. A Facebook page for the Central Park Master Plan was created for project updates and meeting notices. The City provided a dedicated page for the master plan on their website with links back to the Facebook page. San Mateo’s Town Hall site provided an expanded and interactive level of participation to supplement input received at the workshops. The activity on the Town Hall site included a series of questions about Central Park as well as the same survey that was available in the park on May 3rd, 2014. During public meetings and focus groups, project business cards were handed out to attendees as a quick reference for accessing information and updates on the project via on-line sources.
Direct mailing of project meeting post cards to residents and businesses and placement of workshop posters throughout the park increased involvement by the community near the park. Given Central Park’s proximity to the downtown, City staff reached out to DSMA to assist with communications to the business community.
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
2 DESIGN PROCESS
22 GOALS & OBJECTIVES
The public meetings were well attended and the feedback received resulted in a clear set of potential objectives and planning concepts for Central Park’s future. The importance of the community’s feedback cannot be over-looked. Throughout the series of workshops and focus groups, a wide variety of residents contributed valuable input that collectively gave the City an understanding of the citizen’s wishes and concerns. Many individuals as well as special interest groups provided a cross- section of opinions that were critical to framing the overall vision. From that input, and following direction from the City Council, a final list of objectives and concepts were developed and served as the guide for creating the Master Plan.
OBJECTIVES
1. Maintain and enhance open space
2. Preserve and enhance the historic character of Central Park
3. Create a more open “park-like” feel along 5th Avenue
4. Strengthen the physical and visual connection between the park and downtown
5. Provide a variety of passive and active uses
6. Enhance bike and pedestrian access
7. Provide uses and space for multiple generations and demographics
PLANNING CONCEPTS
1. Incorporate art and educational exhibits into spaces and facilities
2. Create plaza/gathering space near 5th Avenue
3. Increase/add performance areas (e.g., movies, dance performances, etc.)
4. Enlarge and relocate Central Recreation Center within the park
5. Make 5th Avenue/San Mateo Drive area pedestrian friendly and more open
6. Improve gateways to park
7. Move bleachers (rotate field)
8. Relocate tennis courts away from 5th Avenue
9. Increase parking (below grade)
10. Distribute parking (less central)
11. Expand park (land acquisition)
2DESIGN PROCESS
23 MAY 2017
MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVES
Each concept that was developed from the goals and objectives had unique features, but all focused on strengthening the park’s connection to Downtown San Mateo while maintaining the characteristics of the park that make it a draw for so many visitors. The following pages feature plan graphics of each alternative and supporting descriptive text that clarifies the differences between each plan. Below is a list of elements and features that were common to all three:
COMMON FEATURES
1. The number of parking spaces in the park remain the same or increase in each plan, and a new below-grade (multi-level) parking structure was considered near 5th Avenue
2. Diagonal parking was shown along Laurel Avenue
3. A plaza space of varying size was featured along 5th Avenue at the end of South San Mateo Drive
4. Play area upgrades were recommended for all three alternatives
5. The children’s train ride remained in all plan
6. Tennis was moved to alternative parks in the City
7. Two or three new restrooms were shown
8. Controlled vehicular access for loading/unloading off Laurel to the concert lawn was shown
9. Underground existing overhead utilities
10. 5th Avenue was enhanced with wider sidewalks and new landscaping
11. Event lawn offered option for permanent or temporary stage solutions
12. New public art and historical interpretive features and exhibits were common to all alternatives
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
2 DESIGN PROCESS
24 OPTION #1 - COMMUNITY CENTER FOCUS
Option #1 featured a new recreation center along 5th Avenue, at the edge of the park, where the tennis courts are today. This brand new 20,000 sf, 2-story building would include two levels of parking below and would house a variety of spaces for various uses and facilities. The area currently occupied by the Central Park Recreation Center would convert to a group picnic area, replacing the existing Rotary picnic grounds, with fixed shelters and tables as well as new green open space. The current picnic grounds would be redesigned to provide 14 parking spaces, (4 accessible) as well as vehicular access to the Kohl Pumphouse and maintenance yard, removing the need for cars and service vehicles to move through the park, reducing conflicts with pedestrians. The existing City Landscape Architect’s office, restrooms and pottery studio, would be removed to allow for the construction of the new recreation center building.
In addition, Option #1 would include:
1. A fenced dog park on Laurel Avenue
2. The removal of the outfield fence, opening the grass area to the park and creating a multi-use space
3. Reduced and remodeled grandstands
4. New park gateway signage
5. New path inside Kohl fence from the corner of 5th and El Camino 9TH AVENUE
5TH AVENUE
LAUREL AVENUE
EL CAMINO REAL
2DESIGN PROCESS
25 MAY 2017
Option #1 Legend
1. Fenced dog park
2. Expanded recreation center and plaza with expanded
underground parking in current location
3. New green open space and group picnic area in location of current Recreation Center
4. Baseball field remains, with skinned infield reduced and grandstand enhancements to include storefronts
5. Enhanced Open space (ball field fencing removed)
6. Slightly expanded train line
7. New on-site parking lot (14 total spaces, 4 accessible) NORTH
Existing Trees
Proposed Trees
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
2 DESIGN PROCESS
26 OPTION #2 ENHANCED OPEN SPACE
Option #2 focuses on maintaining and enhancing open space. A large, ground-level plaza is located at the terminus of South San Mateo Drive above a new two-level parking garage. The Landscape Architect’s office and pottery studio would remain, but be remodeled as a community arts space, while the existing restroom would be removed and replaced. In this option, the ball field grandstand is completely removed in order to open the views from 5th Avenue into the park. Smaller, less formal bleachers would take their place. The existing Rotary picnic area remains, and additional picnicking facilities will be added near the play area. This plan also proposes the removal of the existing recreation center and using the space to expand the main event lawn, allowing for a greater variety of community events. The programs and facilities contained in the existing recreation center are proposed to be relocated. In addition, Option #2 includes:
1. Dog park remains in the ball field
2. Expanded children’s train ride
3. Plaza space that accommodates tables and benches for everyday use as well as events
4. Opportunity for permanent vendors inside the plaza
9TH AVENUE
5TH AVENUE
LAUREL AVENUE
EL CAMINO REAL
2DESIGN PROCESS
27 MAY 2017
Option #2 Legend
1. Large event plaza for community gatherings, street vendors and festivals, with expanded underground parking garage
2. Current Landscape Architecture office/pottery studio remodeled for community/arts space
3. Grandstands removed and replaced with green open space spectator area
4. Event lawn expanded to include current Recreation Center area
5. High fencing occurs only along the backstop/foul line area of the baseball diamond, remaining fencing is low and decorative
6. Expanded train line
NORTH
Existing Trees
Proposed Trees
1 4
3 5
6 2
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
2 DESIGN PROCESS
28 OPTION #3 COMMUNITY GATHERING OPTION
This option allows for an expansion of gathering spaces that are flexible enough to accommodate larger community events while also providing highly functioning spaces for everyday use. The existing recreation center, tennis courts and the ball field are proposed to be relocated to other City parks in order to provide a significant civic plaza for San Mateo. Features would include a central picnic/event pavilion in the location of the current recreation center and a Great Lawn where the ball field now stands. These areas would allow for flexible lawn areas, a variety of seating and picnicking opportunities and new pedestrian paths to emphasize the increased green space, creating opportunity for a variety of groups and demographics and informal events year-round. Option #3 opens the views into the park from 5th Avenue completely.
Additional elements of this options include:
1. Fenced dog park on Laurel Avenue
2. Community building at the edge of the plaza on 5th Avenue
3. New gateway plaza entry at the corner of 5th and El Camino
4. ADA parking for the play area and service vehicle access to the maintenance yard and Kohl Pumphouse
5. Additional picnicking around the Great Lawn
6. New picnic facilities in the play area
7. Plaza space that provides tables, benches and an arbor for shade, large enough for events
8. Expanded train ride
9. Opportunity for permanent vendors at mid-block entry to park 9TH AVENUE
5TH AVENUE
LAUREL AVENUE
EL CAMINO REAL
2DESIGN PROCESS
29 MAY 2017
Option #3 Legend
1. Fenced dog park on Laurel Avenue
2. Large event plaza for community gatherings, street vendors and festivals, and/or Farmer’s Markets with expanded underground parking
3. Current Landscape Architecture office/pottery studio enlarged and re-purposed for community/arts space
4. Picnic/event pavilion in former location of Recreation Center
5. New Great Lawn for flexible use in current softball diamond location
6. Expanded train line
7. New on-site parking lot (14 total spaces, 4 accessible) NORTH
Existing Trees
Proposed Trees
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
2 DESIGN PROCESS
30 CITY REVIEW & THE RESULTING PREFERRED MASTER PLAN
The three initial options and the tennis alternatives were reviewed by several City bodies following Workshops #2 and #3. RRM and the Parks and Recreation Department presented the alternatives with the public feedback from the second workshop to the San Mateo Planning Commission on March 24, 2015, and the Public Works Commission on April 8, 2015. Public input on these alternatives had a significant impact on the resulting outcome. Participant’s feedback on all the individual features helped to shape the preferred plan, while tennis and baseball advocates each made strong cases for their respective interests. In a Joint Session on May 6, 2015, City Council and the Park and Recreation Commission made formal recommendations on a preferred alternative with which to move forward.
Those recommendations included:
• Preserve Fitzgerald Field, with remodeled/reduced grandstand • Remove tennis courts and build 2-3 new recreational-sized courts on south side of Central Park
• Demolish Central Park Recreation building once Self Help for the Elderly lease expires, build new community building near 5th Avenue
• Continue Fitzgerald Field as part time dog park, no new fenced dog park area • Preserve train ride as is
With a thorough summary of comments and resulting recommendations from City review, RRM then worked with City staff to develop a Preferred Master Plan for Central Park. (pictured at right) The Draft was presented to the Park and Recreation Commission and City Council on May 4 and May 16, 2016, respectively, followed by a presentation to the City Development Review Board on July 5, 2016. This plan was a result of the Master Plan Goals and Objectives and feedback from the City and the general public.
2DESIGN PROCESS
31 MAY 2017
Central Park Preferred Master Plan Legend
1. Kohl Mansion interpretive feature
2. Central Park Plaza
3. Community Event Buildings
4. Down-sized grandstand with storefront
facade improvements and community
space
5. Widened pedestrian walk with trees and
benches
6. Existing Japanese Garden
7. New Jim Chalmers San Mateo Rotary
Picnic Pavilion
8. Fitzgerald Field
9. Loading/Unloading/Turn-around area for
authorized vehicles only
10. Event Lawn
11. New picnic grounds and redesigned play
area
12. Existing train ride
13. Existing Rose Garden
14. Kohl Pumphouse
15. New recreational-sized tennis courts
LAUREL AVENUE
EL CAMINO REAL
5TH AVENUE
9TH AVENUE
8 10
7 2
6 13
14 1511
12 4
3 5
1 9
NORTH
Existing Trees
Proposed Trees
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
2 DESIGN PROCESS
32 3FINAL MASTER PLAN
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
Central Park Master Plan Legend
1. Kohl Mansion interpretive feature
2. Central Park Plaza
3. Community Event Buildings
4. Down-sized grandstand with storefront
facade improvements and community
space
5. Widened pedestrian walk with trees and
benches
6. Existing Japanese Garden
7. New Jim Chalmers San Mateo Rotary
Picnic Pavilion
8. Fitzgerald Field
9. Loading/Unloading/Turn-around area for
authorized vehicles only
10. Event Lawn
11. New picnic grounds and redesigned play
area
12. Existing train ride
13. Existing Rose Garden
14. Kohl Pumphouse
15. New recreational-sized tennis courts
LAUREL AVENUE
EL CAMINO REAL
5TH AVENUE
9TH AVENUE
8 10
7 2
6 13
14 1511
12 4
3 5
1 9
S. SAN
MATEO DR
NORTH
Existing Trees Proposed Trees
Interpretive Exhibit/Art Node
3FINAL
MASTER PLAN
35 MAY 2017
FINAL MASTER PLAN
Following the presentation of the preferred Master Plan to the City review boards in the spring and summer of 2016, RRM prepared a final Master Plan for Central Park. This final plan incorporated several changes including:
• Adding a small catering kitchen and storage space to the Jim Chalmers Picnic Pavilion, the addition of more open picnic tables, and a loading/unloading area for vehicles serving the Pavilion • Accessible parking to serve the picnic pavilion as well as the community buildings • The addition of a storage building for athletic equipment at Fitzgerald Field • Design enhancements for Central Park Plaza which ensure a variety of passive and active spaces, the addition of chess tables near the ping pong tables, and the relocation of the vendor buildings from the east to the north side of the plaza
The design team and the City regularly revisited the original objectives for the master planning of Central Park. The Master Planning effort was guided by public feedback and City review as well as the original design objectives set forth for Central Park in the 2002 Community Facilities & Programs Strategic Plan . Furthermore, objectives and planning concepts that were established during the 2014 public outreach process also served as a guide for the final Master Plan.
The Master Plan design includes a ground-level plaza at the South San Mateo Drive terminus and features a community building consisting of two multi-use rooms, totaling approximately 6,000 square feet. As a result of the San Mateo Recreation Facilities Strategic Plan, the City determined that this one-story structure was preferred over a large recreation center and that there were more appropriate locations in San Mateo for a facility of that magnitude. The proposed building would provide the community with space to hold a variety of events that could also connect to the plaza space. A new one or two-level parking garage underneath the plaza was preferred over angled parking on Laurel Avenue as well as surface parking off El Camino.
Three new recreational-sized tennis courts are proposed for the area currently occupied by the Rotary Picnic grounds, while a new picnic/event pavilion is located where the current recreation center stands. The Fitzgerald Field remains, with the grandstand reduced and the facade remodeled to allow for usable community space underneath. The play area is updated and expanded to include natural play features as well as additional individual and group picnic areas. The children’s train ride remains as it exists today.
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
3 FINAL
MASTER PLAN
36 Other features include:
1. A new pedestrian path from the corner of 5th Avenue and El Camino Real, running inside the Kohl fence
2. A new restroom with storage near the picnic pavilion
3. A new restroom between the play area and tennis courts
4. A future site for the Memorial of Fallen Heroes
5. The preservation of a large majority of the existing tree canopy
6. New signage at major pedestrian entry points
7. Controlled vehicular access from Laurel Avenue with a loading and turn-around area
8. A new park maintenance storage building
9. Interpretive features throughout
10. Japanese Garden, Rose Garden, Kohl Pumphouse and Great Lawn preserved
3FINAL
MASTER PLAN
37 MAY 2017
Master Plan zones for descriptive narrative.
LAUREL AVENUE
EL CAMINO REAL
5TH AVENUE
9TH AVENUE
LAUREL &
5TH AVENUE
FRONTAGE
CENTRAL
PARK CORE
EL CAMINO REAL
FRONTAGE
S. SAN MATEO DR.
NORTH
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN
The following narrative describes the features of the Central Park Master Plan, within the following structure:
• El Camino Real Frontage
• Central Park Core
• Laurel & 5th Avenue Frontage
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
3 FINAL
MASTER PLAN
38 3FINAL
MASTER PLAN
39 MAY 2017
NORTH
Existing Trees Proposed Trees
1. New pedestrian entry point with signage
and public art
2. Fitzgerald Field
3. New pedestrian path inside Kohl fence
4. Turf reduction area
5. New outfield fencing
6. Existing children’s train ride
7. Children’s play area
8. Tennis courts
9. Pedestrian entry enhanced with signage
and decorative paving
5TH AVENUE
EL CAMINO REAL
El Camino Real Frontage Legend
2 6
7 8
1 93
5 4
EL CAMINO REAL FRONTAGE
STREET FRONTAGE
Turf under the Redwood trees along El Camino Real will be replaced with mulch to reduce irrigation and ensure the health of the existing trees in that area. A new pedestrian path will run inside the Kohl fence, the length of the ball field from the corner of 5th along El Camino Real. This permeable surface path will connect to the 5th Avenue park frontage as well as creating a new pedestrian entry point at the corner of 5th and El Camino. These landscaping updates support Objective #2, preserving and enhancing the historic character of Central Park, by highlighting the Kohl fence as a treasured feature while creating new pedestrian access along this corridor. In addition, public art and park signage will energize this corner of Central Park. This new path also helps to create a circuit, while avoiding the busiest street frontage, providing a 0.6-mile walking loop through the Park.
Interpretive Exhibit/Art Node
Play Area Detail
NORTH
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
3 FINAL
MASTER PLAN
40 PLAY AREA
The existing children’s train ride will be protected in place along with the existing trees in the play area and along El Camino Real. The pedestrian path that runs the length of Fitzgerald Field from El Camino Real into the park will also remain, as well as the pedestrian circulation between the Event Lawn and the play area. Park users will still have access from El Camino Real, at the two existing entry points, and the historic Kohl fence will remain in place.
The children’s play area will receive a global renovation, beginning with new playground equipment and consisting of traditional as well as natural play elements. New pedestrian paths through the space will connect the newly defined interior spaces to the exterior paths while providing a loop within the play area for small children on bicycles. A new restroom with storage for park equipment at the northern edge will serve the play area as well as the tennis courts and Event Lawn. Individual picnic tables as well as groupings of tables totaling 37 will be provided in this space to expand the picnicking and family gathering potential of the play area. This picnic area was inspired by Objectives #1 and #7, maintaining and enhancing open space and providing uses and space for multiple generations and demographics.
EL CAMINO REAL
Existing Trees
Proposed Trees
2 1
3 5
4 6
6 6
4 2
Interpretive
Exhibit/Art Node
Legend
1. Existing Children’s Train ride
2. New traditional play equipment
3. New nature-themed play experiences
4. New pedestrian paths
5. New restroom with
storage
6. Picnic Area with individual
NORTH
3FINAL
MASTER PLAN
41 MAY 2017
1. Recreational-sized lighted tennis
courts
2. Tennis plaza with benches and
picnic tables
3. New trees and landscaping
4. New path alignment
5. Enhanced pedestrian entry
Legend
CENTRAL PARK TENNIS GROUNDS
While the City and community of San Mateo had an extensive and spirited debate about removing the existing six tennis courts in order to open up Central Park to 5th Avenue and provide a better connection to Downtown, there was still considerable support for some tennis courts in the Park.
Working to satisfy that support as well as Objective #5, Provide a variety of passive and active uses, the Master Plan provides the Park with three recreational-sized (114’ x 56’) lighted courts in the south corner of the park where it is likely to impact the fewest number of existing trees and overall park character. Some of the existing trees, which include unhealthy trees, along the park’s boundary edge may be impacted. The tennis grounds would include a small plaza with benches and 2 picnic tables, new trees and landscaping and a convenient connection to a new restroom in the play area.
A new path alignment is necessary to connect the southern-most park entrance off El Camino Real to the park. This entry point will receive new park signage as well as paving treatment and will lead pedestrians into the park between the play area and tennis grounds. 1 2
3 4
5 EL CAMINO REAL
Central Park Tennis Grounds Detail
NORTH
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
3 FINAL
MASTER PLAN
42 CENTRAL PARK CORE
JAPANESE TEA GARDEN
Celebrating its 50th anniversary in 2016, the Japanese Tea Garden is a treasured feature of Central Park and will be preserved. The urban forest surrounding the garden will also remain, as will the pedestrian paths that lead to the garden.
Japanese Garden Legend
1. Proposed Central Park Plaza
2. Existing pedestrian connection to Japanese Garden
3. Preserved open space
4. Open area adjacent to proposed Rotary Picnic/Event
Pavilion
5. Bioswale area
6. Widened pedestrian access with new trees
Existing Trees Proposed Trees
7TH AVENUE ENTRANCE1 2
3 3
4 5
5 55
5 LAUREL AVENUE
6 Interpretive Exhibit/Art Node 5TH AVENUE
S. SAN
MATEO DR
Rotary Picnic/Event Pavilion Legend
NORTH
3FINAL
MASTER PLAN
43 MAY 2017
ROTARY PICNIC PAVILION
The existing Central Park Recreation Center is currently leased to Self Help for the Elderly, (SHE) and that lease is set to expire on June 30, 2025. Prior to the lease expiration, SHE will relocate to another, yet to be determined, private venue. The Recreation Center will be razed for future improvements. The current curved park bench that sits outside the Recreation Center will remain, as will the established tree planting behind it, and the existing pedestrian circulation. An existing, small loading zone for staff and event vehicles will remain.
1. Existing Japanese Garden entry
2. Pedestrian connection to Central Park
Plaza
3. Small group picnic area
4. New restroom with storage and trash
enclosure
5. Picnic/Event pavilion
6. Vehicular loading/unloading area
7. New path
8. Existing trees to remain
9. Bioswale area
10. Staff parking
11. Barbecue
12. Operational/Small Catering space and
‘Bride’s’ restroom
1 2
5 4
3 6
7 8
8 8
8 9
9 7
10 11
Interpretive Exhibit/Art Node
7 7
12 5 The picnic pavilion offers a flexible open space that is customizable for any event.
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
3 FINAL
MASTER PLAN
44 The Jim Chalmers Rotary Picnic Grove will find a new home in the former location of the Recreation Center. A 3,200 s.f. covered event space, surrounded by new trees and additional pedestrian access, will create a customizable outdoor space for a multitude of events, rotary barbecues, picnics and gatherings for groups of approximately 100 people, seated. This picnic pavilion creates new opportunities for multiple generations and demographics to come together at a variety of events, which helps to satisfy Objective #7. This event space also has the potential for a small catering kitchen and a private restroom/dressing room for weddings and event guests with mobility issues.
The Picnic Grove features new open turf areas, which the community expressed a desire for during the public outreach process. Within this new green space, thirteen picnic tables surround the pavilion, providing additional opportunities for picnic groups of varying sizes. Inside the existing circular bench area, a new small-scale picnic structure with two tables creates an intimate picnicking opportunity amongst the trees, directly across from the Japanese Tea Garden entry.
A new restroom, along the existing park path to the south, will serve the Picnic Grove as well as provide storage for tables, chairs and other event-related furnishings that the City could rent to pavilion users.
An architecturally attractive trash enclosure will sit near the new restroom building.
This reservable group picnic area will serve as both a formal and informal event space. 12( See rendered plan on page 45 for sketch view location.) 9TH AVENUE
NORTH
3FINAL
MASTER PLAN
45 MAY 2017
EVENT LAWN & PUMPHOUSE AREA
The main event lawn is a well-used space at the core of Central Park. On any given day people are juggling, picnicking, throwing a Frisbee, playing with their kids, or having a game of volleyball. The form of the lawn area and paths surrounding this space will be protected in place.
The existing flag and monument marker that is positioned in a planter bed on the southeast side of the event lawn will be relocated to the most northern side, adjacent to the 7th Avenue entrance turn- around. This will create an uninterrupted expanse of lawn for park events, while capturing a currently underutilized space adjacent to the existing flagpole location. This adjustment helps the master plan fulfill Objective #1, to maintain and enhance open space.
The open space between the Event Lawn and the Rose Garden has been reserved for a future Fallen Heroes Memorial site. This area, under established trees, will serve as a contemplative space in which to honor San Mateo service men and women. The well-established rose garden, Kohl Pumphouse, park maintenance yard, and historic dog sculpture that was original to the Kohl Estate will all be protected in place. The protection of these features as well as the addition of the Fallen Heroes Memorial meet Objective #2, preserving and enhancing the historic character of Central Park.
The Park’s maintenance area includes a potential location for an additional storage building. New park signage will mark the 9th Avenue pedestrian entrance more significantly.
Interpretive Exhibit/Art Node
Existing Trees Proposed Trees
1. Existing event lawn
2. New flag and monument location
3. Mobile bandstand location
4. Site of future Fallen Heroes Memorial
5. Existing Rose Garden preserved
6. Kohl Pumphouse
7. New maintenance storage
building
8. 9th Avenue entry signage
9. Existing trees, preserved
10. Existing dog sculpture, preserved
11. Bioswales
12. Rotary Picnic Pavilion Sketch
Event Lawn and Pumphouse Area Legend
1 2 54
3 6
7 8
99 9
9 10
9 9
11 11
11 11
12 CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
3 FINAL
MASTER PLAN
46 LAUREL & 5TH AVENUE FRONTAGE
LAUREL AVENUE
All three of the alternative Master Plan options proposed angled parking on Laurel Avenue, in an effort to increase accessibility to the park for users traveling by car. The City and community expressed concerns over vehicular conflicts along Laurel, however, and preferred to preserve green space over gaining additional parking. The Master Plan, therefore, preserves the open lawn area along Laurel Avenue, and satisfies Objective #1, maintain and enhance open space. Informal recreation continues, all existing trees, ‘Leon’ the Giraffe sculpture and existing pedestrian path alignments are preserved.
New and enhanced entry signs, incorporating the Kohl-style fencing, will replace the existing park signage and an interpretive installation of the original Kohl Mansion footprint will be installed with supporting exhibits to inform visitors of its significance. This interpretive element will not change the paths or the landscaping around it, and is meant to be a simple representation of the footprint, perhaps created from special paving that crosses over the path and turf areas where it used to stand. (for more on the Central Park Interpretive Plan, refer to Chapter 4 of this document) The historic Kohl fencing will also extend from the main entry on 5th Avenue to the corner of 5th and Laurel, and turf reduction will occur under the trees. All of these elements meet Objective #2, preserve and enhance the historic character of Central Park.
New trees will be planted along an enhanced and widened 7th Avenue entrance to the park from Laurel Avenue. This entrance will be pedestrian-only with controlled access for permitted event and maintenance vehicles, and features a turn-around area at its terminus. 3FINAL
MASTER PLAN
47 MAY 2017
LAUREL AVENUE
5TH AVENUE
7TH AVENUE ENTRANCE
Laurel Avenue Legend
1. Open green space preserved
2. Enhanced pedestrian entry with new signage incorporating the Kohl-style fencing
3. Kohl Mansion interpretive footprint feature
4. Kohl-style fencing extended to corner of 5th and Laurel
5. Widened pedestrian access with new trees
6. Turn-around/loading/unloading for permitted vehicles
7. Bioswales
8. Japanese Garden
9. Existing Magnolias
11 2
3 4
5 6
7 87
7 9
Interpretive Exhibit/Art Node
NORTH
Existing Trees Proposed Trees
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
3 FINAL
MASTER PLAN
48 CENTRAL PARK PLAZA
The intent of the Central Park Plaza is to create a more “park-like feel” along 5th Avenue, as was expressed as desirable in Objectives #3 and supported by the City, and helps to fulfill Objective #4, to create a strong connection between the Park and Downtown. The existing parking garage’s vehicular access off 5th Avenue will likely remain as the ingress and egress of the new parking garage. The crosswalk connections at South San Mateo Drive will remain, while the mid-block crossing may be realigned to match up with the existing pedestrian path across 5th Avenue. With this realignment, there is opportunity for a generous bulb out on the northwest side of the street.
Pedestrian access points remain in their current locations, and the existing row of Magnolia trees that align with South San Mateo Drive are also preserved in the final concept plan.
New and enhanced park signage will mark the major pedestrian entry from South San Mateo Drive and Downtown San Mateo. This signage will be centered between the two main entry paths into the park from the South San Mateo crosswalks. The characteristic Kohl fencing will take center stage along 5th Avenue, and the signage should be designed with respect for the historical features of Central Park. The Kohl fencing will run from the corner of 5th Avenue and Laurel, south west, along a widened sidewalk, where it will terminate just before the parking garage entry. Openings interspersed along the fence line will allow for an open feeling visually and physically, into the park, and will also help to define the edge of the park and act as a buffer from 5th Avenue.
View of Central Park Plaza (Draft Final Plan) and new community building from above 5th Avenue 5TH AVENUE
3FINAL
MASTER PLAN
49 MAY 2017
SOUTH SAN
MATEO DR.
Central Park Plaza Legend
5TH AVENUE
1. Existing vehicular ingress/egress for underground
parking remains
2. Existing pedestrian crossings remain
3. Mid-block crossing realigned
4. Existing Magnolia trees preserved
5. Main pedestrian entry enhanced with signage and
existing plus new Kohl-style fencing
6. Kohl-style fencing extended along 5th Avenue
7. Movable bistro tables
8. Open lawn areas
1 5
2 3
4 6
7 7
88 8
9 9
10 11
1212
13 13
14 15
15 16
15 9. Elevated lawn area with stepped seating
10. Permanent vendor kiosks
11. Games area
12. New community building with two rooms
13. Outdoor patio space for community events
14. Pedestrian plaza entry from Fitzgerald Field
15. Stairwells/elevators from parking garage with
storage for bistro tables
16. Bike racks
Interpretive Exhibit/Art Node
NORTH
Existing Trees
Proposed Trees
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
3 FINAL
MASTER PLAN
50 Behind the fence is Central Park Plaza. This open and flexible community space offers users a variety of experiences on a daily basis and for special events. Movable bistro tables, positioned over decomposed granite and under new trees parallel to 5th Avenue will provide flexible seating for those interested in having some interaction with the enhanced streetscape. More movable bistro tables will be placed along the north edge of the plaza, adjacent to the existing Magnolia trees, on decomposed granite and paved surfaces. This seating area offers park users more of a buffer from the street, but still in an engaging public space within the plaza.
Open lawn areas level with the plaza space provide a flexible space for community events and casual picnic and seating area for day to day use. The Central Plaza also provides fixed benches and an elevated lawn area with stepped seating at the south east edge of the plaza, providing additional picnic and seating opportunities with a view out over the plaza towards 5th Avenue. Adjacent to this area is space for permanent vendor kiosks, which would invigorate the plaza day and night, and could help maintain pedestrian traffic through this space into the evening, creating a safe and welcoming environment. Good pedestrian lighting supports evening use as well, and would include, but not be limited to, overhead string lighting across the plaza, uplighting for plaza trees, and bollard, step and post lights throughout.
A dedicated games area is a feature of Central Park Plaza that will appeal to all generations. Permanent ping pong tables and chess/checker tables with seating are examples that can be included on a decomposed granite surface under the shade of new trees. This active area is tucked into the southern corner of the park but is still very much engaged with the plaza space.
Exact positioning of trees and landscaping in the plaza will be based on the design of the new parking structure. The specifications of the garage, including depth, structural consideration and drainage from the plaza above will need to be determined and should be guided by the design intent of the plaza as it appears in the master plan.
At the west edge of the plaza is a new community building with two community rooms separated by a paseo, providing approximately 5,000 square feet of flexible space for community and private events. The building flanks the pedestrian plaza entry near Fitzgerald Field, where new paving and landscaping will help connect the plaza to the Field during community events in a pedestrian-only zone. The community building would be designed to fit the aesthetic of Central Park while providing an open and airy space for the community to enjoy. The footprints of these proposed structures are positioned at the outer edge of the subterranean parking garage, so as to avoid the garage having to support the new buildings. The larger building will house a catering kitchen and restrooms that will be shared with the smaller building. The smaller of the two would be a simple community room available for a variety of events. Portions of the building will have the potential to open up on to the 3FINAL
MASTER PLAN
51 MAY 2017
plaza to expand the event space. Service and catering vehicles will have controlled access from 5th Avenue and limited parking will be provided.
The parking garage will remain in its current location, but will be remodeled in order to have the plaza at level of the street. This approach intends to utilize the existing ingress/egress point, and retain the same number of parking spaces. Further study should be done to determine if a second level of parking could be added as part of the garage remodel.
Pedestrian access to and from the garage will be through the plaza. Stairwells and elevators will be provided near the South San Mateo entry as well as the southeast edge near plaza connection to the new Rotary Picnic Area. These access points are positioned with the plaza design in mind, and are intended to provide the most convenient access without interrupting pedestrian spaces in the plaza.
For parking garage design purposes, consideration for where those stairwells/elevators fall will need to be studied.
Only controlled vehicular access for service vehicles and events will be permitted in the plaza.
Collectively, Central Park Plaza meets all seven of the objectives set forth for the CPMPU.
Artist’s rendering looking into Central Park Plaza from 5th Avenue
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
3 FINAL
MASTER PLAN
52 FITZGERALD FIELD
Although Option #3 of the presented alternatives proposed replacing Fitzgerald Field with open green space and other amenities, the City and community were in favor of preserving this facility. It currently serves adult softball and youth baseball groups and acts as a part time dog park due to its fenced-in area. The Master Plan therefore preserves the field as it stands today with ball field fencing surrounding, allowing for the special events, recreational activity and part time dog park that the field serves. The existing trees along El Camino Real and the south edge of the field will be protected in place, as will the recently installed electrical infrastructure that supports San Mateo On Ice.
The grandstands will be reduced in size to better suit the average number of event attendees using the facility. This reduction in seating capacity will open up the park along the field edge of 5th Avenue, further strengthening the connection to Downtown. With the reduction, the grandstands will be remodeled to present an architecturally interesting facade to 5th Avenue. The space underneath the bleachers will be transformed into potential community or retail space for the City. This will create a storefront feel along 5th Avenue, while also creating a sense of entry to the Park itself. Widened sidewalks and enhanced landscaping around the bleachers will further engage pedestrians. Where, in the past a vehicular gate dominated this entry point, the Master Plan proposes that this area be Artist’s rendering of grandstand facade concept
3FINAL
MASTER PLAN
53 MAY 2017
1. Existing trees remain
2. Grandstands reduced and enhanced to engage 5th Avenue
3. Enhanced pedestrian entry
4. New vehicular entry and gate to field
5. Future equipment storage location
6. New outfield fencing
7. Fitzgerald Field
Fitzgerald Field Legend
1 3
2 5
13 4
7 8
6 9
10 1112 12
10 5TH AVENUE
EL CAMINO REAL
Interpretive Exhibit/Art Node
NORTH
Existing Trees
Proposed Trees
8. Children’s play area
9. New restroom
10. New picnic/event pavilion
11. Pedestrian connection to Central Park Plaza
12. New community building
13. Waste storage enclosure
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
3 FINAL
MASTER PLAN
54 a pedestrian-only zone, with controlled vehicular access for event and maintenance vehicles only.
Additional vehicular access to Fitzgerald Field will be provided through a new gate off 5th Avenue for events and ball field activities. An existing concrete pad on the north side of the field is a perfect opportunity for a much-needed baseball equipment storage building. The existing chain link outfield fencing along the south edge of the field could be replaced with a shorter, more decorative fence style, still keeping balls inside the field while creating a visually more open feel from inside the park.
These design features meet multiple objectives including preserving and enhancing the historic character of Central Park, creating a more open “park-like” feel along 5th Avenue, strengthening the physical and visual connection between the Park and Downtown, and providing uses and space for multiple generations and demographics.
TRASH COLLECTION
The current system of collecting trash and recycling throughout the park is varied. There are dumpsters near Fitzgerald Field in an enclosure, as well as near the existing Rotary Picnic Area, though not enclosed. Individual trash receptacles consist of older concrete cans, and 96-gallon rolling tippers for trash and recycling. In an effort to streamline the system, the Master Plan proposes the following:
96-Gallon rolling tippers near existing trash enclosure These trash can enclosures/cart garages house 96-gallon rolling tippers and are the preferred system for Central Park
3FINAL
MASTER PLAN
55 MAY 2017
Trash enclosures with an appropriate and attractive architectural character should be used to streamline the trash collection system in the park • Pr ovide two new attractively-designed trash enclosures; one between the new community building and Fitzgerald Field; and one near the new restroom at the Play Area. (see plan, opposite page)
• Replace all existing concrete receptacles with 96-gallon rolling tippers, to be housed in a trash can enclosure/cart garage to match those used at Beresford Park
This approach consolidates the unsightly plastic rolling receptacles into attractive enclosures and allows for deliberate placement of said enclosures in locations that are convenient for park users as well as trash collection vehicles.
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
3 FINAL
MASTER PLAN
56 STORM DRAINAGE
The proposed master plan is anticipated to exceed 10,000 square feet of new and redeveloped impervious area and will likely be a C.3 Regulated Project under the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit (MRP). The master plan has taken this into consideration and designed proposed improvements using a Low-Impact-Development approach.
Site Design measures include preserving existing open space and trees, planting interceptor trees, minimizing new impervious area, and disconnecting impervious areas. Stormwater treatment will be provided through a number of permanent Best Management Practices (BMP’s). The proposed plaza/ parking structure will be designed as a green roof with hardscape areas directed to bio retention planters. New paths in the park will be a combination of permeable materials and pavement. The paved paths will direct runoff to adjacent bio retention planters. The proposed tennis courts will direct flows to adjacent bio retention planters.
4ART, INTERPRETATION & EDUCATION
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
4ART, INTERPRETATION
& EDUCATION
59 MAY 2017
DESIGNING THE INTERPRETIVE EXPERIENCE
What truly makes Central Park unique, and what gives it the character that is so treasured by park users, is its history. The Park’s aesthetic originated with the first family when they developed the property as a private residence, and much of the garden layout they established still exists today. For many Central Park visitors, this rich history may not be common knowledge. To share the history of he Park’s evolution and development, a comprehensive interpretive experience should be established.
Interpretive education can take many forms. Most commonly, trail signage informs visitors with images and a narrative that tells a story. This information can also be incorporated into special paving, seat walls, play features, public art pieces and more. Whatever the method, special consideration should be taken to express these stories in a variety of ways in order to truly engage park users.
The interpretive experience of Central Park should be a discovery of stories as users move through the space. There should be unpredictable approaches and interactive exhibits. Heavy amounts of text should be avoided. Exhibits should use key statements and simple titles to communicate topics while using images or physical features to support the stories being told.
The Master Plan suggests the following topics for telling the story of Central Park:
1. The Kohl Family
A brief history of what brought William Kohl to the Bay Area, his background and profession, when he and his family began living on the Central Park property, and the length of their stay
2. The Kohl Estate
A descrip tion of the architecture of the home originally built by Charles B. Polhemus
3. The Kohl Estate Garden
Highlighting the original gardener of the estate, William O’Farrell, noting some of the significant botanical features that once were, and those that still stand today.
4. The Kohl Fence
Brief details about the architecture of the historic fence, when it was originally built and which portions are original to the Kohl Estate
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
4 ART, INTERPRETATION
& EDUCATION
60 5. Central Park’s Beginnings
Noting the date the City of San Mateo purchased the property, making it the first municipal park in the City’s history, and early uses and modifications made
6. Experimental Junior College
Telling the story of the use of the Kohl mansion as a school, detailing some of the ways the rooms of the house were used as classrooms and laboratories
7. The Arboretum Society and Kohl Pumphouse
Significant dates and achievements by the Arboretum Society and their restoration/ preservation of the Kohl Pumphouse, the only original structure remaining from the Kohl Estate.
8. Justin Fitzgerald
The story of the field’s namesake - the major league baseball player, scout and coach, City councilman and family man and what he meant to his community.
9. Rose Garden
10. Japanese Garden
When interpretation and education are developed in Central Park, they should be integral to the physical forms found in the infrastructure of the Park itself. Signage should be primarily supportive information accompanying a physical representation of the topic being interpreted. In the form of sculptures or murals, as part of park seating or paving, these stories should be physically woven into the park’s features. When park users interact, use and enjoy these features as a part of their regular visits to Central Park, the stories being told become identified with the Park in a very permanent way. 4ART, INTERPRETATION
& EDUCATION
61 MAY 2017
Example graphic of potential interpretive signage that could occur throughout the park.
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
5PHASING & IMPLEMENTATION
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
5PHASING &
IMPLEMENTATION
65 MAY 2017
CRITICAL PATH
For the projects listed below in Phases I - IV, the order may change on several project areas based on City priorities and funding. However, there are some circumstances including a desire to keep facilities available to the public and tenant leases that merit consideration of the following critical path factors of the planning and construction process.
1. Off-site tennis court additions- In order to relocate 3 of 6 tennis courts from Central Park to other City park sites, planning, design, and environmental documents must be completed, as well as construction of off-site courts to allow demolition at Central Park. These tasks and identification of a funding source could take several years to complete.
2. Parking Structure and Plaza- There remains considerable discussion, design, planning and funding to be resolved in order to position the facility to be ready to build. This facility will likely follow construction of the Central Park Tennis Grounds at the south end of the park if the City plans to avoid a net loss of tennis courts available to users. The Rotary Pavilion would likely precede, or be concurrent with the construction of new tennis courts in Central Park.
3. Removal of existing Recreation Center- The lease for the current tenant will expire on June 30, 2025. When the building is demolished after that date, the way is cleared for the Rotary Pavilion. The City may decide that the construction of the new Rotary Pavilion should be simultaneous with the construction of the 3 Tennis Courts.
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE
5 PHASING &
IMPLEMENTATION
66 PHASE 1
Project Areas Include:
1.1 T urf Removal T urf removal under trees along El Camino R eal and Laurel Avenue and supplemental
planting
1.2 Ne w Restroom #1 Build ne w restroom near future tennis; demolish playground restroom
1.3 R emodel Playground Build ne w playground including areas 39, 40, & 41; ne w path
1.4 Build Picnic ar eas Cons truct new picnic areas in playground / train zone
1.5 F allen Hero Memorial Design and build memorial
PHASE 2
Project Areas Include:
2.1 Laur el Ave Entry Cons truct modified vehicle/ Pedestrian access & vehicle
2.2 Fitz gerald Field Right field f ence; El Camino path; 5th Ave streetscape; bleacher remodel;
2.3 Ga teways 5th & El Camino; 5th & Laur el
2.4 S torage Building Ne w Storage building – 3rd base area
2.5 Int erpretive Plan Design exhibit s, add education and historic information exhibits
PHASE 3
Project Areas Include:
3.1 Demo REC Cent er R emove existing Recreation Center building (aft er June 30, 2025) unless tenant vacates
sooner
3.2 R otary Pavilion Cons truct Rotary Pavilion, picnic facility & restroom/storage building
3.3 T ennis Grounds Cons truct 3 Tennis Courts and amenities
3.4 Maint enance Yard v arious improvements including new or turn-around
LAUREL AVENUE
EL CAMINO REAL
5TH AVENUE
9TH AVENUE
5PHASING &
IMPLEMENTATION
67 MAY 2017
remodeled garage
PHASE 4
Project Areas Include:
4.1 Plaz a/Parking Cons truct Plaza and streetscape above New P arking garage on 5th Ave (Garage not part of
Central Park funding.)
4.2 Community Bldg. Cons truct New Event -oriented Community Building
4.3 T rash/Recycle Build ne w enclosure near Fitzgerald Field Enclosure
1.1 1.2
1.3 1.5
2.1 2.1
2.2 2.2
2.2 2.2
2.3 2.3
2.3 2.3
2.4 3.1
3.2 2.5
2.5 2.5
2.5 2.5 2.5
2.5 2.5
2.5 2.5
2.5 3.2
3.3 3.4
4.1 4.2 4.2
4.3 3.2
1.1 1.4
NORTH
Existing Trees Proposed Trees
CENTRAL PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE