Agenda packet, special meeting, second session — San Mateo City Council, June 12, 2024

CITY OF SAN MATEO
City Council Special Meeting
June 12, 2024
5:30 PM
City Hall Conference Room C
Entrance is on O’Farrell Street

COUNCIL MEMBERS
Amourence Lee
Lisa Diaz Nash
Rob Newsom Jr.

Adam Loraine

AGENDA
THIS MEETING IS BEING HELD PURSUANT TO THE GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE ORDERS WHICH SUSPEND CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF THE BROWN ACT.

THIS MEETING CAN BE ATTENDED IN PERSON OR REMOTE BY JOINING ZOOM – SEE CODES BELOW.

PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED BOTH IN PERSON AND REMOTEL Y.

SEE END OF AGENDA FOR OPTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING.

To join via Zoom – click here:

[insert meeting date and link to proper meeting] Zoom Meeting To join via telephone: (408) 638-0968
Webinar ID: [insert #] Passcode: [insert #]

CALL TO ORDER
Roll Call

NEW BUSINESS
The public will have an opportunity to comment during the consideration of these items.

1. Planning Commissioner – Interviews
The Appointment Subcommittee for the Planning Commission, comprised of Mayor Lisa Diaz Nash, Deputy Mayor Rob Newsom Jr., Council Member Adam Loraine and Council Mamber Amourence Lee, with Planning Manager Manira Sandhir advising will interview the following applicants to fill one vacant seat on the commission and to establish an eligibility list for a future vacancy:

Vikash Bhagwandin
Heather Damelio
Phil Mieszkowski
Michael Ross
Adam Klafter
Jennifer Kim
Dianne Whitaker
Alexander Seroff
Elizabeth Kioa
Sergio Zygmunt

ADJOURNMENT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AGENDAS:

Agendas and material are posted on the City’s website on the Friday preceding each Council Meeting and can be viewed on the City's website at
www.cityofsanmateo.org
. Any supplemental material distributed to the Council after the posting of the agenda will be made part of the official record.

1 of 73

WATCHING A MEETING ON TV:

City Council meetings are broadcast live on Comcast/channel 27, Wave/channel 26, or AT&T/channel 99.

For transmission problems during the broadcast, please call (650) 522-7099. For all other broadcast comments, call (650) 522-7040, Monday-Friday, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m.

WATCHING A MEETING ON A COMPUTER:

There are three ways to stream.
1) Public Meeting Portal
www.cityofsanmateo.org/publicmeetings
2) City YouTube channel and stream it on YouTube:
http://youtube.com/CityofSanMateo
3) Watch TV live stream:
https://www.cityofsanmateo.org/193/Channel-San-Mateo-Live-Stream

PUBLIC COMMENTS/REQUEST TO SPEAK
Prior to the Meeting
Send comments to:
[email protected]
until 4 p.m. the day of the meeting.

During the meeting
By Zoom:

Click the link at the top of the agenda and you’ll be added to the meeting. All attendees are muted by default. When the item of interest is open for consideration, select the “Raise Your Hand” icon and you will be called on at the appropriate time.

By telephone:

Call (408) 638-0968 and enter the conference ID found at the top of the meeting agenda. When the item of interest is open for consideration, select *9 to raise your hand. When called upon, press *6 to unmute, state your name and provide your comments.

In Person:

At the meeting complete a “Request to Speak” form, submit a request at the speaker kiosk or scan the QR code.

ACCESSIBILITY:

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, those with disabilities requiring special accommodations to participate in this meeting may contact the City Clerk’s Office at (650) 522-7040 or [email protected]
. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

2 of 73

POST PACKET

PUBLIC COMMENT

THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC COMMENTS WERE

SUBMITTED AFTER THE RELEASE OF THE AGEND A
PACKET

3 of 73

From: Lisa Taner
To: Clerk
Subject: Planning Commmissioner Choice Tonight
Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 6:27:54 AM
Dear City Council,
The City has an opportunity to get things SO right this evening. Dianne Whitaker is the far and away best choice to fill our Planning Commission vacant seat.

Dianne has proved herself to be impartial, intelligent, capable and she has the architectural background that is currently lacking on this commission.

Dianne's return to throw her hat into the ring is nothing short of an answered prayer, what with the contentious relationship the public has had with members of this commission for a number of years.

A Code of Conduct revamp is not necessary for the likes of Dianne and she would do more than bring a unique skill set and proven record back to this Commission. Seating Dianne is a step toward repairing relationships
between the City and its residents, who are seeking calm, level-headed, approachable representatives.

Thank you for your consideration.

Lisa Taner

4 of 73

From: LOUISE BEKINS
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commision Appointment
Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 8:54:41 AM
Dear City Council Subcommittee members
This is to request that you appoint Diane Whitaker to the Planning Commission. She is very knowledgeable, with a proven high standard track record. We need her.

Many thanks,
Louise Bekins
San Mateo

5 of 73

From: joanne bennett
To: Clerk
Subject: Planning Commission Vacancy - Please Consider Dianne Whitaker Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 3:21:04 PM
To Whom It May Concern:

Please take into serious consideration the appointment of Dianne Whitaker to the Planning Commission.

Dianne previously was on the Planning Commision several years ago. Dianne has also been a longtime board member of Hancsm (Home Association of North Central San Mateo). It is thru this organization that I have come to personally know Dianne.

I highly recommend selecting Dianne to a position on the Planning Commission.

She has always
demonstrated a fair and balanced approached while formerly on the Planning Commission and would go above and beyond asking the tough questions in regards to Planning decisions.

Thank you,
Joanne Bennett
San Mateo Resident

6 of 73

From: Jan Busa
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: In support of Dianne Whitaker for Planning Commission vacancy Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 11:49:45 AM
Dear City Council Planning Commission Appointment Subcommittee Members, I was delighted to hear that Dianne Whitaker has applied to fill the Planning Commission vacancy. What a great candidate! She is an architect, former Planning Commission member and longtime San Mateo civic volunteer, whom I have long admired. Dianne will bring a nice balance to the group as it works to make the best decisions for the future of San Mateo.

Thanks for considering my input.

Best,
Jan Busa

7 of 73

From: Ruthmary Cradler
To: City Council (San Mateo); Clerk
Subject: Planning Commission Opening--- Dianne Whitaker Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 1:45:33 PM
Dear Mayor Nash, and City Council Members:

We are writing in support of Dianne Whitaker for the vacancy on the Planning Commission.

Dianne brings a set of skills that we need in our City governance and policy setting commissions.

Specifically to the Planning Commission, she:

Is a professional architect, thereby understands design and construction. Clearly important for the Commission;
Understands the nuances of planning, such as when one decision is made, that it has impact on other decisions;
Has the ability to work with the diverse agencies and levels of government that are part of our community—State, County and Local as well as Bay Regional; Is respected by our City Hall staff;
Has excellent communication skills with both the lay and professional public.

We have many issues facing our community, such as CalTrans traffic corridors, balance of new homes vs business, City infrastructure, to name a few.

Sometimes, to the lay person, a
solution to a problem seems obvious, but when you bring various experts together, you may find the solution just isn’t pragmatic or economically viable.

Dianne always asks the
questions to ensure all aspects and points of view are considered.

She is a team builder and a team player. And as a former Commissioner, she has the experience and knowledge of the history of development in our community to serve us well.

We cannot recommend her more highly, and we are asking for your support of Dianne Whitaker for Planning Commission.

Thank you
Sincerely,
Ruthmary Cradler
John Cradler

8 of 73

9 of 73

From: Ronnie Eaton
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Dianne Whitaker
Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 2:17:02 PM
Good afternoon,
I urge you to select Ms. Whitaker for a place on the Planning Commission. She is experienced in the work of the commission, having served previously as a Planning Commissioner. She is also an architect, a profession that provides her the background and skill to fully and fairly evaluate matters that come before the commission.

Thank you,
Ronnie K. Eaton

10 of 73

From: MAUREEN FRESCHET
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commission appointment
Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 11:58:11 AM
Dear Honorable Members of the Council,
It is my understanding that this evening you will meet to review candidates for an open seat on the Planning Commission. I am writing to strongly urge you to appoint former Planning Commissioner, Diane Whitaker.

I worked closely with Diane while I was a member of the Planning Commission and later as a member of the City Council. I have always been impressed with Diane's vast knowledge of architecture and planning, her understanding of our community and our goals, the historical perspective that she brought to the table, and her openness to hearing input from the public.

Diane is highly respected by our community; she is dedicated, intelligent, a critical thinker, and importantly, she never had an "agenda" influencing her decisions.

When
dealing with members of the community, she was always welcoming and civil in demeanor - a critical and necessary skill for someone whose job is to represent all of our constituencies.

Our commissioners represent our community and when making appointments, a foremost consideration should be selecting someone who is not just open-minded, but also fair-minded and a good listener.

The Council relies heavily on the recommendations brought forth by the Planning Commission and it is crucial to have diversity reflected not just in members, but in perspectives.

Diane will bring much needed civility, knowledge, and commitment to the Planning Commission. I can think of no one better to represent our community on this important commission.

Sincerely,
Maureen Freschet

11 of 73

12 of 73

From: Catherine Hart
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Dianne Whitaker
Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 3:15:59 PM
Hello,
I ask you conduct a fair interview process and strongly consider such a highly qualified, fair and impartial applicant.

Thank you,
Catherine Hart
San Mateo

13 of 73

From: [email protected]
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Re: meeting 6/12/24 -In support of Dianne Whitaker for the Planning Commission Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 9:37:20 AM
Honorable Mayor and Council Members,
As someone who served 14 years on the Planning Commission (in the 70's and again in the 90's) I believe I have an "inside look" at what makes a good choice for the commission.

I heartily endorse Dianne Whitaker for appointment to the Planning Commission vacancy. As she has proven in the past, she will be a quietly thoughtful presence in any discussion the commission undertakes. Her long history with the city allows her to bring a useful corporate memory to issues. Her professional architect's eye is a plus.

Her long time residence and community involvement in the North Central

neighborhood is another advantage, since much of what keeps coming before the city seems to have a significant effect on that part of town.

I was thrilled when I heard that Dianne was willing to serve another term. I encourage you to take advantage of her deep qualifications and appoint her to the Planning Commission.

Karen Herrel
Hillsdale Blvd.

San Mateo

14 of 73

From: Laurie Hietter
To: Clerk; City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commissioners
Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 10:40:49 AM
Dear Planning Commissioner Review Committee:

Dianne Whitaker is the right person for the Planning Commission. She will bring the needed expertise, balance, and objective review. Dianne is not only an experienced architect but also a small business owner who understands the needs of all of San Mateo residents, especially since she is a long-term North Central resident. Dianne is thorough and will read all materials to understand the project and make a decision that works for all of San Mateo.

Dianne will be an independent voice who is not beholden to developers and their interests. We need qualified, independent
Planning Commissioners who are not beholden to special
interests.

Please consider the voices of the people who live in San Mateo.

Thank you,
Laurie Hietter

15 of 73

From: Tom Huening
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commission Appointment
Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 11:22:22 AM
Honorable Councilmembers,
I have had some experience with applicant Diane Whitaker and highly recommend her to fill the position on the Planning Commission.

Regards,
Tom Huening,
San Mateo
--
Spiritual Choices Publishing
Thomas Huening - Amazon

16 of 73

From: Shirley Melnicoe
To: City Council (San Mateo); Clerk
Subject: Dianne Whitaker for Planning Comm.

Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 2:23:32 PM
Dear Council Members,
I am writing to offer my enthusiastic support for Dianne Whitaker’s candidacy for a position on the Planning Commission. As a long-time resident of our community and a seasoned architect, Dianne possesses the knowledge, experience, and dedication necessary to make significant contributions to the commission.

Diane's extensive experience in architecture provides her with a unique perspective on urban planning and development. She possesses a deep understanding of the local building codes, zoning regulations, and land use policies. This firsthand knowledge will undoubtedly prove invaluable in ensuring that any decisions made by the Planning Commission are not only in compliance with existing regulations but also aligned with the long-term vision and goals of our community.

In addition to her professional expertise and prior experience, Dianne is known for her integrity, collaborative spirit, and strong work ethic. She is someone who listens attentively, thinks critically, and communicates effectively—a true asset to any decision-making body.

I think you will find her fair and impartial which are
important attributes for this Commission.

In conclusion, I wholeheartedly endorse Dianne Whitaker for a position on the Planning Commission. I am confident that she will continue to serve our community with distinction and contribute significantly to shaping its future in a positive and inclusive manner.

Thank you.

Respectfully,
Shirley Melnicoe
San Mateo Resident
--

17 of 73

From: Thomas Morgan II
To: Clerk; City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commission Appointment Support for Dianne Whitaker Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 8:56:00 AM
Dear Mayor and City Council
I would like to express my support for Dianne Whitaker for the vacant position. Dianne is a practicing architect and brings that perspective which is under-represented on the current commission.

During her past service on the commission I always found Dianne's comments to add value to the projects brought before the commission and helped make those projects and San Mateo a better place for people living and visiting San Mateo.

I believe Dianne would strike the right balance of celebrating our past and building the future San Mateo we all strive to be a part of.

Thank you,
Thomas Morgan

18 of 73

From: Dana Sahae
To: City Council (San Mateo); Adam Loraine
Subject: Planning commissioner appointment
Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 2:36:13 PM
Dear Council,
I'm writing this letter to urge you to appoint Dianne Whitaker to the San Mateo Planning Commission.

She has already proven herself as fair and hard-working. I believe her experience will be a tremendous benefit to the commission, and to our city.

I hope you consider this request when making your decision tonight.

Sincerely,
Dana Sahae

19 of 73

From: Francie
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commission
Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 2:09:01 PM
Dear City Council -
I’m a resident of Central San Mateo and am encouraging you to select Dianne Whitaker for the Planning Commission. I believe she has the right combination of experience and training to be an asset to the city of San Mateo. As you are aware, she is an architect, lives in North Central and has been on the PC before. She has proven herself to be capable and is the best choice to fill our Planning Commission vacant seat.

Thank you,
Frances Souza
Sent from my iPhone

20 of 73

From: jill valladares
To: [email protected]
Cc: Clerk
Subject: City Council Special Meeting Agenda - Appointment Subcommittee to the Planning Comisison Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 11:28:29 AM
Dear Council Members,
I support Dianne Whitaker for the vacant seat on the commission. Dianne is very qualified as a former planning commissioner, working architect and small business owner. We need experienced and knowledgeable architects on the Planning Commission. Dianne is a North Central resident who is very familiar with our community and can relate to our needs.

I strongly endorse Dianne Whitaker.

Thank you for your consideration,
Jill Valladares

21 of 73

From: Michael
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Cc: Martin McTaggart
Subject: Please appoint Dianne Whitaker to the Planning Commission Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 11:11:17 AM
Dear City Council,
The City has a rare opportunity to unequivocally do the right thing tonight. Dianne Whitaker is clearly the best choice to fill our Planning Commission vacancy.

Dianne can hit the ground running, having served on the Planning Commission for years, where she was highly respected. She has proven herself impartial, intelligent, and capable, She also
possesses the architectural background that is very valuable in this role. As a resident of North Central, she will represent that neighborhood well.

Dianne would return much-needed credibility, integrity, and representation to a planning commission that has lost that in recent years.

I remind the council that your job is to select the best person for the role who will best represent the residents of San Mateo, not the one who will most likely drive your personal agenda. Representative government only works as well as the people purporting to represent its residents.

Thank you
- Michael Weinhauer

22 of 73

From: Connie Weiss
To: City Council (San Mateo); Zachary Dahl
Subject: City Council Special Meeting Agenda - Appointment Subcommittee to the Planning Commission Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 1:10:03 PM
Hello Mayor Diaz Nash and City Council Members,
I cannot write a more perfect email to you than what Lisa Taner has already sent (see below). Please consider her input to reflect my thoughts as well.

Thank you,
Connie Weiss
San Mateo Resident
Begin forwarded message:

On Wednesday, June 12, 2024, 9:01 AM, Lisa Taner wrote:

Dear City Council,
The City has an opportunity to get things SO right this evening. Dianne Whitaker is the far and away best choice to fill our Planning Commission vacant seat.

Dianne has proved herself to be impartial, intelligent, capable and she has the architectural background that is currently lacking on this commission.

Dianne's return to throw her hat into the ring is nothing short of an answered prayer, what with the contentious relationship the public has had with members of this commission for a number of years.

A Code of Conduct revamp is not necessary for the likes of Dianne and she would do more than bring a unique skill set and proven record back to this Commission.

Seating Dianne is a step toward repairing relationships between the City and its residents, who are seeking calm, level-headed, approachable representatives.

Thank you for your consideration.

23 of 73

From: Stephen Weller
To: City Council (San Mateo); Clerk
Subject: Appointment to City Planning Commission
Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 1:30:44 PM
We are long term residents of The City of San Mateo.

I understand that an appointment will be made to a Subcommittee of the Planning Commis.

I endorse Diane Whittaker for appointment to this Committee Post.

Diane brings
experience as an architect, business owner and City Resident, plus prior experience on the Planning Commission to this important task.

Stephen Weller, MD

24 of 73

From: weller323
To: City Council (San Mateo); Clerk
Subject: Subcommittee Planning Commission Appointment: Diane Whitaker Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 12:47:24 PM
As a San Mateo resident, I urge the City Council to nominate Diane Whitaker to the Subcommittee of the Planning Commission.

Diane is an architect, small business owner and North Central resident---all of which will lend valuable perspective to the Planning Commission. And she has had previous experience as a planning commissioner. Her approach to balanced growth for our city is what we need for planning the future of San Mateo.

Sincerely,
Nancy Weller

25 of 73

26 of 73

From: Genel Morgan
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Candidate for appointment to vacant Planning commission position Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 3:52:56 PM
To whom it may concern:

I strongly support the appointment of Diane Whitaker to the vacant Planning Commission position.

There have been many complaints about the conduct of present Planning Commission members and I believe Diane will add some impartiality to the Commission.

The Planning Commission should prioritize concerns of San Mateo residents over building contractors and other special interests.

I also urge that there be a Code of Conduct adopted for all San Mateo City boards, commissions and the City Council.

Regards
Genel Morgan
Sna Mateo

27 of 73

From: Frank Elliott
To: Clerk
Subject: Comment regarding Planning Commission Appointment Date: Wednesday, June 12, 2024 3:56:06 PM
On behalf of Less Red Tape, we highly recommend the subcommittee for Planning Commission Appointment avoid appointing someone who is firmly aligned with San Mateo Heritage Alliances, as an officer of that organization.

It is my understanding that Diane Whitaker is Secretary of San Mateo Heritage Alliance, and while she may be able to take a neutral role as a commissioner, the potential for conflict of interest, or the perceived conflict of interest, will likely be problematic for the City.

I believe an appointment of Diane would add to the already divisive tone among Baywood neighbors. I urge the Sub Committee to give preference to a candidate who is not conflicted.

Thank you,
Frank Elliott

28 of 73

29 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]
By checking the box below, I hereby certify that all statements made in this application are true and I authorize investigation of all matters contained in the application. I acknowledge that any false statements or misrepresentation on this application will be cause for refusal of placement or immediate dismissal at any time during the period of my placement. I understand that the City of San Mateo is an Equal Opportunity Employer and this application is public.

Certified/Agreed
2024-04-02
Submitted By Date

30 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
The 2040 General Plan is a comprehensive long-term document that outlines the vision, goals, policies, and strategies for guiding future growth and development within San Mateo. It serves as a blueprint for land use decisions and physical development, focusing on balancing growth and change. San Mateo’s General Plan plays a crucial role in shaping land use decisions and the future built environment of the city. It should reflect the collective vision of residents, policymakers, planners, and stakeholders regarding how the city should grow and evolve while preserving its character, enhancing the quality of life, and promoting sustainability. At a super high level, the 2040 General Plan looks to increase high- density residential and mixed-use units that benefit from the existing public transportation to reduce congestion and increase resident access to an expanded local business offering. The ultimate goal is to improve the retail landscape and encourage more dollars to stay within our community. Finally, the General Plan has a community outreach focus that looks to encourage the personal health of San Mateo residents by providing better access to health care and promoting a healthy lifestyle. There is an environmental component that addresses the need to increase access to outdoor space, embrace sustainability, and enhance natural landscapes while acknowledging concerns over environmental changes and potential safety considerations.

2. As California faces the current housing crisis, local land use control over how and where new housing is created has been limited, San Mateans have a great interest and many different views on this topic.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
While I have strong opinions on housing availability, limitations, and development, I must keep an open mind when reviewing development proposals. If I have learned anything, I don't always have all the information, and it is best to reserve judgment until I do. I believe there needs to be a more common sense approach to our building and development approvals. In my line of work, I have encountered so many situations where the rules made little sense, but the workaround made even less - and completely ignored the intention of the rules. Planning needs to consider the unintended consequences more as they relate to the long-term goals of San Mateo. As for the relationship to state requirements, my opinion is that any decisions must be evaluated for their benefit to our community first and foremost, and I would not be opposed to pushing back on the state to maintain the health of our San Mateo community.

31 of 73

32 of 73

Heather Damelio, Page 2
planning integrations. Opened, staffed, and managed operations for over two years. Negotiated sales contracts, and developed partnerships.

IApex, Inc. 1999-2000
Integration Consultant Alamo, California
Handled SAP integration utilizing customer tools for efficiency so that large Enterprise companies could exchange business transactions with small and medium sized business partners. Wrote proposals and maintained high profile accounts.

Esprit 1998-1999
Financial Analyst, San Francisco, California
Responsible for working with merchandising divisions in producing and monitoring their budget. Supported the logistics and systems areas and acted effectively as a dedicated analyst to Moonstone, Inc. developing financial tools to help forecast and run its business. Primarily responsible for establishing a European and Japanese business structure for Moonstone, Inc.

Professional Golfer 1997-1998
Players West Tour, San Francisco, California
Morgan Stanley Venture Partners 1996 - 1997
Research Analyst, San Francisco, California
Peking Handicraft, Inc. 1996
Credit Manager, South San Francisco, California

ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCE/ HONORS
Board Member, Fundraising Chair
San Mateo Gymnastics Booster Club, Belmont, California 2017 – current Chairperson, Main Event Fundraiser
Samaritan House, San Mateo, California
Recipient of National PTA Honorary Service Award
2014
Chairperson, Baywood Auction Fundraiser
Baywood Elementary School, San Mateo, California
Raised $260k for extracurricular student

33 of 73

Heather Damelio, Page 3
Education Committee Chair
San Mateo County Association of Realtors, San Mateo, California 2003

EDUCATION
Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA
August 2018 – June 2020
Master of Legal Studies
Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma
January 1993 - December 1995
Bachelor of Science, Management
University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon
September 1991 - June 1992
Bachelor of Science Coursework

34 of 73

35 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

Certified/Agreed
2024-04-07
Submitted By Date

36 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
The general plan is a document used to guide the city's long term development. It contains rules and guidelines about what time of development is allowed in different parts of the city.

37 of 73

38 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

Certified/Agreed
2024-04-30
Submitted By Date

39 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
I understand that San Mateo's General Plan will serve as the guideline for how San Mateo will develop and improve over the next 20 years. It is important to have a vision for the future and the General Plan is just that. Without a vision and plan, you will not end up with the results you want, and it is with good foresight that San Mateo has put forth a general plan. I understand that it contains overarching ideas as to the future development that the city will see and how residents will live in the city for years to come.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
When reviewing development proposals, I would first look to see if the proposal would be compliant with both San Mateo's zoning ordinance and the state law, as I believe it is important to follow the law in order to avoid any costly litigation that would be burdensome to the city and the taxpayers. Next, I would analyze the proposal in relation to the General Plan, as that is the agreed upon vision for the future of San Mateo. In instances when the Planning Commission has room for discretion on the proposal, I would carefully consider whether the development is going to have a net positive or negative impact on the neighborhood as it exists presently, especially considering the residents' interests as those living in close proximity of a development are most impacted, either positively or negatively, when a development is approved and built. My personal views would play a role in my analysis of the impacts to the local neighborhood, however I would consider all sides of the issue and the public's opinions before making a decision on how to proceed.

40 of 73

41 of 73

Matteoni, O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, CA
Law Clerk
8/2012 – 1/2013
• Researched legal issues relevant to real estate, land use, and eminent domain litigation • Compiled zoning data, surveys, and deeds to determine ownership and permitted uses of real estate • Responded to broad discovery requests for production of documents

Legal Internships
5/2011 – 8/2011 Pro Bono Project Silicon Valley, San Jose, CA 1/2011 – 4/2011 Office of the County Counsel, San Jose, CA 5/2010 – 8/2010 Regional Fair Housing Commission, Sacramento, CA

Education

University of California, Hastings College of the Law, San Francisco, CA Juris Doctor, 2012
• Witkin Awards for Excellence in Local Government, Real Estate Transactions, and Personal Injury Litigation (awarded for earning the highest grade in each class) • Wiley W. Manuel Pro Bono Services Certificate

University of Colorado, Boulder, CO
Bachelor of Arts, Political Science, 2008

Licenses

State Bar of California, Attorney
State Bar # 287936

California Department of Real Estate, Broker
License # 01921791

42 of 73

43 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

Certified/Agreed
2024-03-31
Submitted By Date

44 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
I have a good understanding of the General Plan; land use expansion to build housing based on the CA state mandate as well as height requirements.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
My #1 concern is for the health and safety of the community. I would assess the need and logistics of the building, as well as the impact it would have on the community mostly from a health and safety standpoint. If it is reasonable and does not affect the community's livelihood or well being, and does not diminish the culture and happiness of the community then I support building new housing.

45 of 73

46 of 73

EXPERIENCE
co-Founding ScienGst (Associate Director), ADC Research, Cancer Pharmacology: Jan 2022 - VincaStemyx Inc., San Mateo
Oncology Research Strategy: Evaluate Novel ADC payloads developed from the lab of Dr. Dale Boger, Ph.D. at The Scripps Research InsStute.
• Successfully licensed assets from Scripps, and established a fruiqul collaboraGon. • Chemical Biology: Screened numerous linker-payload coupling strategies and conjugaGon methods. • Cell line development: viral and CRISPR based methods to support cell based assays. • In vitro and In Vivo pharmacology: EvaluaGon and benchmarking of novel payloads. • Managed a small research team at a CRO.

Principal ScienGst (Associate Director), Solid Cancer Pharmacology: May 2020 - Nov 2021 Astellas, South San Francisco
Immuno-Oncology Research Strategy: IdenSﬁcaSon, validaSon of novel targets for the implementaSon of a bispeciﬁc anSbody directed CAR-T cell therapy.
• Target idenGﬁcaGon and validaGon: microarray, qPCR expression and mutaGon analysis using public databases. • Cell line engineering: viral and CRISPR based methods to establish CAR-T cell lines. • EvaluaGon of targets using cell based co-culture killing assays with the Incucyte system. • Established and maintained external partnerships (academic and/or industry) with follow up to meet goals. • Presented strategy, collaboraGons, and experimental data updates to senior leadership for go/no-go decisions. • Mentored and Managed a team of non-Ph.D. scienGsts and managed CROs. • Provided scienGﬁc review with recommendaGon for partnerships, collaboraGons, and acquisiGons to the BD teams. co-Founding ScienGst (Associate Director), Cancer Discovery and Pharmacology: Jan 2016 - Apr 2020 OncoStemyx Inc., Palo Alto
Oncology Research Strategy: Small molecule drug discovery (HTS) for induced syntheSc lethality (ISL) of cell intrinsic driver mechanisms and resistance mechanisms in cancer.. • Target idenGﬁcaGon and validaGon using bioinformaGcs to predict induced syntheGc lethal (ISL) interacGons. • Discovered a novel inhibitor hedgehog receptor SMO that regulates mulG-drug resistance. • Cell line engineering: viral and CRISPR based methods to support cell based assays. • In vitro and In vivo pharmacology (PK/PD): Cell based assays, combinaGon therapy in human CDX xenograf models. • Data-driven decision-making with rigorous experimentaGon for go/no-go decisions. • Interfaced with FDA through pre-IND meeGngs for guidance to conduct Phase 1 clinical trials. • Wrote the preclinical/pharmacology secGon of the IND applicaGon for a basket trial, provided in vivo eﬃcacy and PK data for a two drug combinaGon therapy in colon cancer, neuroblastoma, and adrenal cancer. • Mentored and Managed a team of non-Ph.D. scienGsts and managed CROs. • Established collaboraGons with industry and academic partners.

Patent Families (4): #US10507208B, #PCTUS2018027371, #15/859,498, #62/484,852 Principal ScienGﬁc Researcher: Jun 2014 - Dec 2015 UCSF-VA Medical Center, San Francisco
Study: EvaluaSon of c-Kit inhibitors and therapeuSc anSbodies targeSng c-Kit. • In Vivo Pharmacology (PK/PD/Eﬃcacy) of c-Kit therapies in a spontaneous model of Kras-G12D driven lung cancer.

Postdoctoral Fellowship: Jun 2008 - May 2014
UCSF Medical Center, San Francisco
Advisor: J. Michael Bishop, Professor, Professor & Chancellor Emeritus, and Nobel Laureate Grant Support: NIH T32 Ruth L. Kirstein postdoctoral Award c-Kit induces syntheSc lethal interacSons in Kras-driven lung tumors:
• Discovered c-Kit signaling through PI-3 kinase is required for the development of Kras-G12D driven lung tumors. • Conducted several crosses of c-Kit mutant bearing mice with a spontaneous model of Kras-G12D driven lung tumors to Vikash J. Bhagwandin, PhD Page of 2 4

47 of 73

geneGcally dissect c-Kit signaling pathway, tumor burden, and survival. • Pﬁzer collaboraSon: EvaluaGon of c-MET inhibitors PF-04217903 and PF-02341066 (crizoGnib) in pancreaGc cancer. • Exelixis collaboraSon: EvaluaGon of XL184 (cabozanGnib) in pancreaGc cancer, (Sennino et al. 2012, Cancer Discovery). • Exelixis collaboraSon: EvaluaGon of XL184 and XL186 (cabozanGnib) in Liver cancer.

EDUCATION
Ph.D. Cell Biology, Cancer Biology, Telomerase & Cancer Stem Cells: Aug 2003 - Apr 2008

UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER
Advisors: Jerry W. Shay Ph.D., Vice Chair & Professor of Cell Biology Woodring E. Wright, M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Cell Biology Grant support: Lung Cancer SPORE grant, NASA-NSCOR Space RadiaGon grant • Developed a novel metastaGc model of pancreaGc cancer (PDAC) to assess cancer stem cells. The MetastaSc PotenSal and Chemoresistance of Human PancreaSc Cancer Stem Cells. Bhagwandin et al. 2016, PLoS One. • IsolaSon, immortalizaSon, and characterizaSon of a pheochromocytoma cell line. Ghayee and Bhagwandin et al. 2013, PLoS One.
• Geron Corp. collaboraSon: EvaluaGon of GRN163L (Imetelstat) in an orthotopic xenograf model of lung cancer. In vivo InhibiSon of Lung Cancer by GRN163L: A Novel Human Telomerase Inhibitor, Dikmen et al. 2005.

B.A. Biology, Biochemistry & Pharmacology: UC SANTA CRUZ A.A., A.S., Biology, Biotechnology, Chemistry, Physics: COLLEGE OF SAN MATEO

TEACHING
• Invited Lecturer: ‘Diversity in Cancer Stem Cells’, FronGers in Stem Cells in Cancer Course – Cancer Stem Cells, Ponce Health Sciences University, June 19-24, 2016
• Invited Lecturer: ‘KIT proto-oncogene supports the development of ras tumors’, UCSF-VAMC • Invited Lecturer, ‘PancreaGc Cancer Stem Cells’, UTSW, Cancer Biology Course II

HONORS AND AWARDS
• AFLAC Inc. Scholar-in-Training Award:
• AACR/Lustgarten FoundaGon, University of North Carolina Special Conference • “PancreaGc Cancer 2006: Early DetecGon and Novel TherapeuGcs” • Outstanding Performance Award: UCSF, Cardiovascular Research InsGtute

MEETINGS AND COURSES ATTENDED
• Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory MeeGng: Mechanisms & Models of Cancer (2014) • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory MeeGng: InﬂammaGon & Cancer (2011) • Keystone Symposia: Role of InﬂammaGon in Oncogenesis. Keystone, Colorado (2010) • AACR / PancreaGc Cancer: Early DetecGon and Novel TherapeuGcs (2006) • Advances in Tissue Engineering, Rice University (2005) • 19th Lost Pines Cellular and Molecular Biology Conference, M.D. Anderson (2005)

SUMMER INTERNSHIPS
• Geron Corp. - ImmortalizaGon of primary epithelial cells with hTERT • Dendreon Corp. - Seavle, WA; DendriGc cell therapy in cancer • Genentech Inc. - Cloned the Human Homolog of Hedgehog Receptor Smoothened (Smo) • Tularik Inc. - Expression and aﬃnity puriﬁcaGon of STAT4 and STAT6 to support small molecule HTS discovery. • Cell Genensys Inc. - RT-PCR proﬁling of cytokines involved in Muscular Dystrophy Vikash J. Bhagwandin, PhD Page of 3 4

48 of 73

POSTERS & ABSTRACTS
Bhagwandin VJ, Bishop JM; KIT proto-oncogene supports the development of RAS lung tumors. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory MeeGng: Mechanisms & Models of Cancer. Cold Spring Harbor, NY , August 2014.

Bhagwandin VJ, Bishop JM; The Role of Mast Cells in Lung Cancer, Keystone Symposia: Role of InﬂammaGon in Oncogenesis. Keystone, Colorado, February 2010.

Bhagwandin VJ, Brekken RA, Fleming JB, Wright WE, Shay JW; Characterizing and TargeGng PancreaGc Cancer, AACR / Lustgarten FoundaGon / PancreaGc Cancer 2006: Early DetecGon and Novel TherapeuGcs. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, June 2006.

Richer E, Slavine N, Lewis M, Tsyganov E, Gellert GC, Dikmen ZG, Bhagwandin VJ, Shay JW, Mason RP , AnGch PP; Three Dimensional Light Emission Tomography (LET) using MulGple RotaGng CCD Cameras. Society for Molecular Imaging, St.

Louis, MO Sept.2004
Bhagwandin VJ, Harper A, Beck AW, Mason RP , Richer E, AnGch PP , Tsyganov E, Lewis M, Slavine N, Fleming JB, Wright WE, Brekken RA and Shay JW; DetecGon of PancreaGc Cancer In Vivo Using Light Emission Tomography (LET). 13th Conference of the InternaGonal Society of DiﬀerenGaGon, Honolulu, HI Sept. 2004.

Verghese GM, Bhagwandin VJ, and Caughey GH; RegulaGon of the mouse prostasin (prss8) gene, an ENaC-regulaGng serine protease. FASEB 2003

PUBLICATIONS
Bhagwandin VJ and Bishop JM; KIT proto-oncogene supports the development of RAS induced lung tumors. (Submived to Science).

Bhagwandin VJ, Bishop JM, Wright WE, Shay JW; The MetastaGc PotenGal and Chemoresistance of Human PancreaGc Cancer Stem Cells. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 9;11(2):e148807
Co-ﬁrst author: Ghayee HK*, Bhagwandin VJ*, Stastny V, Click A, Ding Liang-Hao, Mizrachi Dario, Zou YS, Chari R, Lam WL, Bachoo RM, Smith AL, Story MD, Sidhu S, Robinson BG, Nwariaku FE, Gazdar AF, Auchus RJ, Shay JW; Progenitor Cell Line (hPheo1) Derived from a Human Pheochromocytoma Tumor. PLoS One. 2013 June;8(6):e65624.

Sennino B, Ishiguro-Oonuma T, Wei Y , Naylor RM, Williamson C, Bhagwandin VJ, Tabruyn SP , You W, Chapman HA, Christensen JG, Afab DT, McDonald DM; Suppression of Tumor Invasion and Metastasis by Concurrent InhibiGon of c- Met and VEGF Signaling in PancreaGc Neuroendocrine Tumors. Cancer Discovery. 2012 Mar;2(3):270-87 Bhagwandin VJ and Shay JW; PancreaGc Cancer Stem Cells: fact or ﬁcGon? Biochimica et Biophysica Acta: Molecular Basis of Disease; Review. 2009 Apr;1792(4):248-59.

Trivedi NN, Tong Q, Raman K, Bhagwandin VJ, Caughey GH; Mast cell alpha and beta tryptases changed rapidly during primate speciaGon and evolved from gamma-like transmembrane pepGdases in ancestral vertebrates. J Immunol. 2007 Nov;179(9):6072-9.

Tong ZY , Illek B, Bhagwandin VJ, Verghese GM, Caughey GH; Prostasin, a membrane-anchored serine pepGdase, regulates sodium currents in JME/CF15 cells, a cysGc ﬁbrosis airway epithelial cell line. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2004 Nov;287(5):L928-35
Verghese GM, Tong ZY , Bhagwandin VJ, and Caughey GH; Mouse Prostasin Gene Structure, Promoter Analysis, and Restricted Expression in Lung and Kidney. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2004 Apr;30(4):519-29 Bhagwandin VJ, Hau LWT, Mallen-St. Clair J, Wolters PJ, Caughey GH; Structure and AcGvity of Human Pancreasin, a Novel TrypGc Serine PepGdase Expressed Primarily by the Pancreas. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2003 Jan;278(5):3363-3371
Vikash J. Bhagwandin, PhD Page of 4 4

49 of 73

50 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

Certified/Agreed
2024-04-11
Submitted By Date

51 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
the general plan is simple: it is the organizing tool cities use to plan development. This allows cities to plan everything from Police Force numbers to school locations.

52 of 73

53 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

Certified/Agreed
2024-04-15
Submitted By Date

54 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
The General Plan is the city’s long-term vision for how San Mateo will continue to grow and evolve through the year 2040, and a statement of community values. Different sections of the plan address numerous concerns, from emergency preparedness and ecology to transportation and land use. I believe that a holistic view is essential to tackle any of the many challenges that we face as a society, and the production of a general plan is an acknowledgement of that fact. Now that the plan has been adopted, I see it as one of the responsibilities of the Planning Commission to aid in its implementation in consultation with city staff and the other arms of city government. Related to my ongoing Preservation Masters studies, and my work with the SF Victorian Alliance, I have also been paying particular attention to the General Plan’s mandate that San Mateo craft an updated Historic Preservation ordinance. Within that is the need to prepare objective historic resource design standards, prepare new historic context statements and conduct a citywide survey to help guide heritage conservation activities, and ultimately explore the possibility of San Mateo becoming a Certified Local Government (CLG), which would provide a greater degree of local oversight. The General Plan calls for an “appropriate balance” which I agree is essential; a balanced approach has the potential to provide both better protection for the existing places and landscapes which our community values, while at the same time providing greater clarity and objectivity for redevelopment, rehabilitation and adaptive reuse projects, as San Mateo’s built environment continues to evolve and change. I am excited about the possibility of being able to contribute to this work in particular.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
I believe that the first responsibility of any commissioner is to rely on the standards and guidelines provided in local and state law, and maintain an objective perspective. When there are opportunities to provide feedback which draws upon my prior experience and knowledge, I want to use those in service of furthering the interests of the community as a whole as opposed to any personal position. One of the most effective ways to ensure that the community feels seen and heard and that they are being represented objectively is to use the community-generated General Plan as a guide and work towards consensus whenever possible. As I referred to in one of my previous answers, I am currently engaged in volunteer nonprofit work which has required me to moderate discussions on exactly the concerns raised here. In that role, I have taken great care to treat all participants and perspectives with respect and objectivity, to hear all sides, and to make sure that everyone who wished to contribute has had an opportunity to do so. I also consulted with the full board prior to opening the discussion up to the membership to see if there was a consensus position which I could present. This process of collaboration and dialogue has already resulted in better outcomes for the organization than would have been possible without it, and it is how I would voluntarily choose to approach these same discussions in any setting.

55 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

56 of 73

Adam Klafter

Work History

Volunteer with the Victorian Alliance of San Francisco, 2014 to Current Vice President 2023-Present
Previous Positions within the organization:

Membership Secretary, 2017-2019
Grants Coordinator: 2021-2022

The Victorian Alliance (VASF) is a community-run 501c-3 nonprofit which focuses on education and advocacy for San Francisco’s architectural heritage.

Sales and Design, 01/2015 to 05/2019
All Natural Stone – Burlingame California
Worked with architects, designers, and retail customers to source stone and tile for building projects. Specific responsibilities ranged from ensuring materials met specifications and calculating quantities and costs and managing logistics, to direct design work and the production of detailed installation instructions.

Education

Master of Science: Historic Preservation, Expected in 12/2024 University of Oregon – Eugene, OR

Bachelor of Arts: Interior Architecture, 06/2014
California College of the Arts – San Francisco, CA

57 of 73

58 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]
Please list any other background information (business, education, community involvement) which might be useful in considering your appointment and attach a resume: Through my years as an attorney at Davis Polk & Wardwell, a law firm in Menlo Park that will soon be relocating to Redwood City, and my various community service commitments, I’ve taken opportunities to immerse myself in the Peninsula and support its local organizations. I’ve served on the Steering Committee of my law firm’s Asian South Asian Middle Eastern affinity group and through that positon, have had a chance to organize community events that also support local businesses. For example, we recently partnered with the Asian American Bar Association of the Greater Bay Area to organize a Crystal Springs Reservoir hike followed by a brunch at Palette Tea Garden in Hillsdale. Another organization I’m proud to volunteer for is the Silicon Valley Urban Debate League, which partners lawyers with local Bay Area schools to provide support in debate-centered instruction. Through this organization, I have the opportunity to partner with K-12 schools for events like high school career days and moot court competitions. I think an essential part of this committee should be knowledge of the community and how its decisions will impact our residents. I hope that my community outreach through my current volunteer opportunities will bring additional experience and value to this commission.

Graduate of:

By checking the box below, I hereby certify that all statements made in this application are true and I authorize investigation of all matters contained in the application. I acknowledge that any false statements or misrepresentation on this application will be cause for refusal of placement or immediate dismissal at any time during the period of my placement. I understand that the City of San Mateo is an Equal Opportunity Employer and this application is public.

Certified/Agreed
2024-04-16
Submitted By Date

59 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
I understand San Mateo’s General Plan is an ongoing city planning guide that sets the overarching goals and policy ideas for the city’s next twenty years. The General Plan is not only developed by government officials, but heavily relies on community members to provide input and comments. To me, it’s been heartening over the past few years to see how seriously the city has been taking its community outreach; I appreciated being able to easily walk into pop-ups in accessible community areas like Hillsdale Mall and become more educated on the General Plan. The 2040 guide was recently adopted and includes ten Big Ideas the next few years of San Mateo. These ideas address issues including the local economy and how to support local businesses; anticipated environmental changes like the sea level rise and protection from extreme weather events; prioritizing mobility and local connectivity through increased transportation options; and enhancing the quality of life for all residents, including those in our city who are historically disadvantaged. Chief among the priorities for the General Plan is shaping San Mateo’s future land use decisions, with the 2040 Land Use Element informing how the City addresses California’s next three required Housing Element cycles. Beginning in 2025, the city will complete a comprehensive zoning code update so that it is consistent with the 2040 General Plan. While I understand the General Plan sets out the goals and related policies for the city, it will be up to the City Council and Planning Commission to action those goals and policies, in a way that is consistent and honors the General Plan.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
California’s housing crisis, and how that applies to the relatively affluent cities in the Peninsula, is undoubtedly complex. The state and local governments have understandably attempted to address the issue, which encompasses both a lack of housing and specifically the lack of affordable housing, by mandating the creation of additional housing throughout our local counties and cities. However, a blanket solution doesn’t adequately address the concerns of local communities and residents, who care about not only housing, but issues of safety and community culture. In the first instance, community members need to be both educated and heard. The average San Matean may not know what government regulations mandate and what can or cannot be done according to those regulations; being more fully educated will inform how community residents react to and respond to housing decisions.

We also need to consider the diversity of our city; many don’t have the time or resources to attend a local commission or city council meeting. We need to first think of how to more effectively do outreach to all members of our community and how to collect their opinions, even if in an informal setting.

Ultimately, there is common ground among the different factions on this issue. At their core, all San Mateans value safety and the right to housing. It’s up to local officials to communicate these shared values and to remain transparent in their decision making with our city’s residents.

60 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

61 of 73

JENNIFER KIM

EDUCATION
Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA
J.D., May 2020
Honors: Dean’s Award for Community Leadership
Activities: Board of Student Advise rs; Class Marshal; Asian Pacific American Law Students Association, Co-President, Alumni Chair; West Coast Law Students Association, Co- President; Harvard Immigration Project; Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review

Relay Graduate School of Education, New York, NY
M.A.T. (Masters in the Art of Teaching), July 2014

Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
A.B., magna cum laude in Sociology, May 2012
Honors: High Honors in Sociology; Harvard College Scholar, top 10% of class in 2009-2010 Thesis: “ The Social Institution: Perceptions of Mental Health in the Institution of Harvard College”

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Davis Polk & Wardwell, Menlo Park, CA
Litigation Associate November 2020-Present
Led discovery and witness preparation in antitrust investigation. Drafted motions in civil litigation and intellectual property matters. Researched and prepared for hearing on behalf of Eric Garner’s family and police reform advocates in a judicial inquiry into Mr. Garner’s arrest. Deposed witnesses on behalf of towns and county in Colorado defending their right to pass gun safety ordinances. Managed teams of associates on five different pro bono projects for Stop AAPI Hate in issues ranging from anti-AAPI hate and educational equity. Currently leads affinity group and advocates on behalf of diverse attorneys to firm leadership.

The Legal Aid Society (Juvenile Rights Program), New York, NY Legal Intern Jun 2018-Aug 2018
Researched and drafted four motions supporting the immediate removal of clients from their foster homes, requesting additional aid for a foster parent, and advocating for private client interviews without the presence of a parent. Conducted 14 client interviews. Appeared on the record in Brooklyn Family Court, advocating for clients in permanency hearings and adjournments in contemplation of dismissal.

Democracy Prep Public Schools (Teach for America), New York, NY Curriculum Advisor , Grade Team Leader, Classroom Teacher Jun 2012-Jun 2017 Taught in a District 1 charter school in East Harlem. Managed classroom of up to 33 students each year with up to 25% of students having an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) for special needs and up to 8% of students being English language learners. Advocated on behalf of 15 students to the NY State Committee on Special Education to attain IEPs and special education services. Promoted to Grade Team Leader in 2014 to manage a team of five teachers while continuing to teach in the classroom; represented team at school leadership meetings; led professional development sessions.

Niya Sushi, Huntington Beach, CA and Sachi Japanese Cuisine, Redlands, CA Waitress, Cashier, Marketing Sep 2002-Present Worked in family restaurant; beginning in 2008, remotely ran marketing campaigns for restaurant while continuing to waitress during school breaks.

COMMUNITY SERVICE AND INTERESTS
Languages: Conversational Korean
Organizations: Korean American Community Foundation of SF (Associate Board); Silicon Valley Urban Debate League (Legal Advisory Committee); Harvard Law School Association APA Alumni Network (VP); Harvard Club of SF; Asian American Bar Association of the Great Bay Area; Sister District CA Peninsula Interests: Strategy Games, Dance, NBA Basketball, Event Organizing

62 of 73

63 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

Certified/Agreed
2024-04-18
Submitted By Date

64 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
The General Plan is the FOUNDATION for local land use planning, and serves as the guideline for the future of San Mateo. The General Plan provides a VISION for the foreseeable planning horizon and reflects the community's long-term vision. The Plan translates this Vision into GOALS, POLICIES and ACTIONS for the physical development of San Mateo and is used by the City Council and the Planning Commission when considering land-use and planning-related decisions.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
I was raised by a Father who strongly believed in following the rules, even if you did not agree with them. That is a principle I follow to this day. While I may not always agree with the laws (rules) that have and are being passed in Sacramento, I will follow them, and work towards a solution that is best for the City of San Mateo. New housing, especially at the lower income levels, is urgently needed. I would be a strong advocate for new "affordable" housing in appropriate locations within San Mateo, such as near public transit, commercial and retail businesses. I would read and study all meeting materials prior to the Planning Commission meetings; would actively listen to comments from the public and fellow Planning Commissioners and share my personal comments; and then engage in discussion with my fellow PC Commissioners to work towards crafting a decision that will benefit the greatest number of San Mateo residents.

65 of 73

66 of 73

March 17, 2021
DIANNE R. WHITAKER, AIA
Page Two

PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
2008-2010 Director, The American Institute of Architects, California Council. Member since 1983. 2004 President, The American Institute of Architects, San Mateo County Chapter. Member since 1983.

Chair, City of San Mateo Planning Commission. Member 2010 - 2019.

San Mateo County Coastside Design Review Committee. Member 2008 - 2017.

Supplemental Exam Commissioner, California Architects Board. 2003 - 2011.

Treasurer, City Arts of San Mateo. [2002 President, 2005 & 2006 Co-President] Member since 1996.

Member, City of San Mateo Civic Arts Committee. Member since 2008.

City of San Mateo Housing Rehabilitation Loan Committee. 2005 - 2012.

Secretary, HIP Housing Development Corporation. Member since 2002.

Vice President, Home Association of North Central San Mateo (HANCSM). Member since 1995.

Member, California Preservation Foundation.

Member, Cal Alumni, University of California at Berkeley.

Member, College of Environmental Design (CED) Alumni, University of California at Berkeley.

REFERENCES
Jack Matthews, AIA, Principal: John Matthews Architects, AIA; Noemi K. Avram, AIA, Principal: Gumbinger Avram Architects; Nicki Dennis Stephens, Executive Vice President; American Institute of Architects, California Council;

67 of 73

68 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

Certified/Agreed
2024-04-30
Submitted By Date

69 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
General Plan should be planned according to its diversity in population, should be enjoyable and viably vibrant, safe and secured to the community and with a community that is enhanced and flourishes to all members of the community.... The City and Community stands and plans on a community with limited land availability, therefore needs individual that will plan appropriately for the future with its use of available resources;

However, the City of San Mateo has limited land space for its physical use and development of the area.

Therefore, the City must, in an ongoing review the existing policy and to update its general plan, goal and vision. Perhaps, the ordinances and codes for residential area near town can be more flexible, with allowance of additional units to help with needed housing availability. The City must consider Land Use that is comprehensive, with policies that will guide the future use and appropriate land development to enhance the City of San Mateo. The City must implement the voice of the communities as to the goals and development of the community. Because of the limited land use, it's appropriate for proposals and future plan to include and appropriate considers the roadways, available and possible public transportation, traffic routes that is needed to improve and help with the community development. As for my personal view, I have the abilities to accept and support majority decisions as to any planning development......

70 of 73

71 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

Certified/Agreed
2024-04-30
Submitted By Date

72 of 73

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
It’s critical to the future of the city because it lays out what the city will loook like from an operational and housing standpoint.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
I would be serving the city and would be meeting with as many community members to consider their input and would not allow my personal preferences impact my policy choices.

73 of 73

San Mateo City CouncilJune 12, 2024

San Mateo City Council
June 12, 2024