Cities Index.
Att 2 - Appeal Form to the City Council

San Mateo City Council
July 15, 2024

Document
Att 2 - Appeal Form to the City Council
Meeting
July 15, 2024
Body
San Mateo City Council
Original file
1.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on sanmateo.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

APPLICATION FOR APPEAL Date Filed:

City of San Mateo
330 W. 20th Avenue MAY
San Mateo, CA 94403 Office Use Only
°4
File#:

TO: • City Council Fee:

Tentative Hearing Date:
→ Commission
L Zoning Administrator
• Other:
owner: 3909 Marshall Ave, Born + Raised there
Name: Katherine Doughty Daytime Phone
APPELLANT Email:

Address:

Street City Zip Code
Project Being Appealed: Third story addition

SUBJECT
Address / Location: 619 W. 39th Ave., San Mateo, 94403
State Reasons for Appeal and Particular Areas of Concern (if an appeal of Planning Applications conditions of approval, please list each condition appealed and the reason for your appeal):
1) Ralph Robinson, Contract Associate Planner for the City of San Mateo, alleged at the Planning Commision hearing that the original notice for public comments of the project was sent to my Marshall address and claimed my tenant did not forward it to me. That statement is incorrect. I had informed the Planning Department that my tenant, verbally and in writing, stated the notice had not been received at my Marshall address. 2) One of the commissioners had a working relationship with the subject's architect and should have recused himself from voting against my objection to the project as currently proposed.

Added Comments or Proposal (if any):
1) During the Planning Commission hearing, my presentation of there not being 3 story homes in the neighborhood was not considered seriously because, according to the commissioners, the proposed 3 story project looked okay as is, but my proposal that using a flat roof on the currently proposed addition to reduced the impact on views from my home was rejected. My other two proposed alternatives in lieu of the current proposal, including building an ADU or building a flat roofed addition above the existing flat roofed family room which would reduce the overall addition height by up to 5 feet, were not considered at all. 2) The applicant and her designated building contractor Luis Larrazabal, do not come before the Council with clean hands. The applicant has at least two building projects done without a building permit, such as a large family room and bathroom additions. Larrazabal is not the property owner, he is not licensed, and he has a many year history of incurring debts of over $1 million involving taxes and mechanics liens on various projects.

Rah E Po 5/2/24
Appellant's Signature Date
(Attach additional sheets if necessary)
Please refer to Comprehensive Fee Schedule for appeal filing fees.

PROPERTY LINE

BUILDING SETBACK LINES

EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT
* A FLAT ROOF

REDUCES

CURRENT PROPOSAL MAXIMUM
FOR 3RD STORY * HEIGHT OF

ADDITION AND ADDITION BY
STAIRWELL BUT APPROX.

WITH FLAT ROOF 3 FEET
438 SF ADDITION ALTERNATIVE PLAN 'A'

WITH FLAT ROOF
19 W 39TH AVE.

PROPERTY LINE

BUILDING SETBACK LINES

ALTERNATE

EXISTING BUILDING

ADDITION

FOOTPRINT

WITH FLAT

ROOF OVER

CURRENT PROPOSAL FOR EXISTING
3RD STORY ADDITION FAMILY ROOM
476 SF

THE FAMILY

ROOM FLOOR
I52 FEET
! ADDITION ALTERNATIVE PLAN 'B' LOWERTHAN

THE HOME'S

ABOVE FAMILY ROOM

MAIN FLOOR
-
20 W 39TH AVE.

PROPERTY LINE

BUILDING SETBACK LINES

ADDITION EXISTING BUILDING

ALTERNATIVE FOOTPRINT

SINGLE STORY

CURRENT PROPOSAL FOR
ACCESSORY 3RD STORY ADDITION

DWELLING UNIT
450 SF

ADDITION ALTERNATIVE PLAN 'C'

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT
21 W 39TH AVE.

← All documents from this meeting