Agenda packet — San Mateo City Council, May 7, 2025

CITY OF SAN MATEO
City Council Special Meeting
May 7, 2025
6:00 PM
City Hall - Conference Room C
Entrance is on O’Farrell Street

APPOINTMENT SUBCOMMITTEE

MEMBERS
Robert Newsom Jr.

Adam Loraine
Nicole Fernandez
Danielle Cwirko-Godycki
AGENDA
THIS MEETING IS BEING HELD PURSUANT TO THE GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE ORDERS WHICH SUSPEND CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF THE BROWN ACT.

THIS MEETING CAN BE ATTENDED IN PERSON OR REMOTE BY JOINING ZOOM – SEE CODES BELOW.

PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED BOTH IN PERSON AND REMOTEL Y.

SEE END OF AGENDA FOR OPTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING.

To join via Zoom – click here:

[insert meeting date and link to proper meeting] Zoom Meeting To join via telephone: (408) 638-0968
Webinar ID: [insert #] Passcode: [insert #]

CALL TO ORDER
Roll Call

NEW BUSINESS
The public will have an opportunity to comment during the consideration of this item.

1. Planning Commissioner – Interview
The Appointment Subcommittee for the Planning Commission, comprised of Mayor Robert Newsom Jr., Deputy Mayor Adam Loraine, Councilmember Danielle Cwirko-Godycki, and Councilmember Nicole Fernandez, with Community Development Director, Zachary Dahl advising. The Subcommittee will interview the following applicants to fill two seats on the commission and the establish an eligibility list for a future vacancy.

John Lovell
Taso Zografos
Aidin Rezaei Sarabi
Vikash Bhagwandin
Adam Nugent
Caiti Busch
Kevin Simpson
Lisa Maley
Rebecca Dun
William Mader
Maxwell Schaemkel

ADJOURNMENT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AGENDAS:

Agendas and material are posted on the City’s website on the Friday preceding each Council Meeting and can be viewed on the City's website at
www.cityofsanmateo.org
. Any supplemental material distributed to the Council after the posting of the agenda will be made part of the official record.

WATCHING A MEETING ON TV:

City Council meetings are broadcast live on Comcast/channel 27, Wave/channel 26, or AT&T/channel 99.

For transmission problems during the broadcast, please call (650) 522-7099. For all other broadcast comments, call (650) 522-7040, Monday-Friday,

1 of 114

8 a.m. - 5 p.m.

WATCHING A MEETING ON A COMPUTER:

There are three ways to stream.
1) Public Meeting Portal
www.cityofsanmateo.org/publicmeetings
2) City YouTube channel and stream it on YouTube:
http://youtube.com/CityofSanMateo
3) Watch TV live stream:
https://www.cityofsanmateo.org/193/Channel-San-Mateo-Live-Stream

PUBLIC COMMENTS/REQUEST TO SPEAK
Prior to the Meeting
Send comments to:
[email protected]
until 4 p.m. the day of the meeting.

During the meeting
By Zoom:

Click the link at the top of the agenda and you’ll be added to the meeting. All attendees are muted by default. When the item of interest is open for consideration, select the “Raise Your Hand” icon and you will be called on at the appropriate time.

By telephone:

Call (408) 638-0968 and enter the conference ID found at the top of the meeting agenda. When the item of interest is open for consideration, select *9 to raise your hand. When called upon, press *6 to unmute, state your name and provide your comments.

In Person:

At the meeting complete a “Request to Speak” form, submit a request at the speaker kiosk or scan the QR code.

ACCESSIBILITY:

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, those with disabilities requiring special accommodations to participate in this meeting may contact the City Clerk’s Office at (650) 522-7040 or [email protected]
. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

2 of 114

CITY OF SAN MATEO

BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICATION
Planning Commission
Commissioner
REQUIREMENTS:
• Resident and a registered voter of the City of San Mateo • Meeting attendance required
• If appointed, must attend a commissioner orientation session & any training offered

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Name: John Lovell
Email:

Primary
Phone:

Address: San Mateo
Street City Zip Code
San Mateo resident
since: 2013 I am a registered voter in City of San Mateo: Yes Board or Commission interested in serving on (check all that apply):

Did you attend a meeting for this Board or
Commission?: Yes

QUALIFICATIONS
My qualifications for serving on this board/commission are as follows: I have 13 years of experience working in the field of non-profit affordable housing development. I am currently employed as the Associate Director of Housing Development for Mission Housing Development Corporation, where I help lead a team of project managers overseeing a large pipeline of 100% affordable housing developments in San Francisco. I know the ins and outs of the real estate development process, and pride myself on being a “jack of all trades” with years of experience directing the work of architects, contractors, attorneys, and an array of technical consultants who are involved in the development of affordable housing. I’ve successfully navigated developments through various stages of regulatory approval. I’ve built trust with residents in our affordable housing portfolio, neighbors from diverse backgrounds, and forged successful partnerships with other non- profits, public officials, and community-based organizations. Moreover, I have a successful track record of attained financing for projects in the challenging and competitive environment of affordable housing finance.

I want to serve on this board/commission because: I have a breadth of knowledge in affordable housing, real estate, public policy, architecture, development, and local history that would make me a useful addition to the commission.

Furthermore, I am a lifelong resident of the Bay Area. While I was born and raised in San Francisco, at this point I’ve lived most of my adult life in Downtown San Mateo. For as long as I can remember, going back to my childhood, I’ve had an enduring and passionate interest in cities, architecture, and local history. Growing up in San Francisco, it was initially very difficult for me to imagine myself settling anywhere outside of my hometown. When it eventually became clear to me that settling in with my wife would entail moving out of the city to be closer to her job in the South Bay, we were drawn to Downtown San Mateo because it offers the best of both worlds - all the great things about living on the Peninsula, without having to leave behind the walkable mixed-use neighborhood fabric to which I am most accustomed.

Please list any other background information (business, education, community involvement) which might be useful in considering your appointment and attach a resume: I have a BA in political science, with honors, from UC Berkeley. I am currently enrolled in the San Mateo County Leadership Council’s “Emerging Leaders” 2024-2025 cohort, with an expected completion in June 2025.

Graduate of:

3 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]
By checking the box below, I hereby certify that all statements made in this application are true and I authorize investigation of all matters contained in the application. I acknowledge that any false statements or misrepresentation on this application will be cause for refusal of placement or immediate dismissal at any time during the period of my placement. I understand that the City of San Mateo is an Equal Opportunity Employer and this application is public.

Certified/Agreed
2025-04-28
Submitted By Date

4 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
State law requires that each city in California adopt and maintain a general plan, which serves as a “master” policy framework for how cities will grow for the future, while addressing certain issues such as housing, economic development, transportation, open space, and quality of life. After a lengthy community outreach process, The San Mateo City Council adopted the “Strive 2040” general plan last year. One of the most important parts of any general plan is the Housing Element, which sets forth how cities must plan to accommodate Regional Housing Needs Allocation (“RHNA”) goals every 8 years. In the latest 2023-2031 RHNA cycle San Mateo must plan to accommodate slightly over 7,000 new units of housing. Of these 7,000 units roughly 3,040 must be targeted for “above moderate” income households, and the rest must be affordable for “moderate” to “very low” income households. While housing elements and RHNA cycles have been established policy for decades, due to the severity statewide housing crisis, in this recent RHNA cycle the CA Department of Housing & Community Development (“HCD”) has been applying much more scrutiny in their review of local housing elements, while implementing more measures to for holding local governments accountable for planning how to meet RHNA goals. Last year HCD determined that San Mateo’s housing element was in “substantial compliance” with State housing element law. This designation precludes San Mateo from having to wrestle with approving “builder’s remedy” projects, that some of our neighboring jurisdictions on the Peninsula must currently contend with for not having compliant housing elements.

2. As California faces the current housing crisis, local land use control over how and where new housing is created has been limited, San Mateans have a great interest and many different views on this topic.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
I work for an organization that’s at the forefront of responding to the Bay Area’s housing crisis. It would be disingenuous of me to try and claim that my personal beliefs and values have nothing to do with my profession. I’m also afforded a regional perspective on the housing crisis, as someone who commutes back to a home on the Peninsula after a day of working for a community based developer in the Mission District of San Francisco. For most of my lifetime, local jurisdictions on the Peninsula have been eager to accommodate the growth of the technology industry, while simultaneously being reluctant to make room for a commensurate amount of new housing, especially multifamily housing. Given the incentives that local governments face, it’s perhaps understandable why this position has been maintained for so long. On the other hand, the inability to provide enough housing on the Peninsula has largely meant that Bay Area’s most marginalized communities have been left with the burden of having to absorb a disproportionate amount of the disruption that inherently accompanies economic growth. As a result, lawmakers in Sacramento have determined that the housing crisis cannot be solved without curtailing the large amount of discretion that has historically been to afforded local governments on decisions about zoning and land use. With all that being said, I do think that the City of San Mateo deserves credit for some of the recent moves as a recent example of how to successfully respond to the call to” take on its fair share” in addressing the regional housing crisis, while accounting for other perspectives in the

5 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]
community - especially with the passage of Measure T as a “grand bargain” which prioritizes growth in several focus areas, while preserving San Mateo’s single family home neighborhoods. Moreover, as San Mateo is currently engaged in the discussion of expanding tenant protections as a part of its current housing element, I believe I can bring a well-rounded perspective to this discussion, as someone who occupies the unique position of being both a tenant and a landlord. My wife and I rent our primary residence in a large multifamily building in San Mateo. But I also have plenty of experience approaching landlord/ tenant relations from the perspective of an affordable housing developer, and as someone who personally owns a small multifamily rental property in the East Bay.

6 of 114

John Lovell

Summary Core Competencies
Established affordable housing & real estate
development professional with track record of
successfully overseeing challenging and complex
projects from start to finish. Broad scope of
development and project management
expertise. Diligent and deliberate decision
maker who excels at wearing many hats.

Real estate development, affordable housing
finance, project management, due diligence,
transaction closings, acquisition rehabs &
recapitalizations, strategic planning, architecture
& construction management, community
outreach, public policy, writing & editing, critical
thinking, resourcefulness and problem solving,
broad and profound knowledge of Bay Area +
California history and development trends.

Relevant Experience

Mission Housing Development Corporation ▪ San Francisco, CA ▪ July 2015 to Present Associate Director of Housing Development ▪ March 2025 to Present Senior Project Developer ▪ January 2021 to March 2025 Project Developer ▪ January 2018 to January 2021
Assistant Project Developer ▪ July 2015 to January 2018 • Oversaw the development of new construction and rehabilitation projects through multiple stages of development, from predevelopment, to construction, to stabilization & close out • Identified and evaluated the feasibility of potential development opportunities through coordination of predevelopment, underwriting, and due diligence activities • Planned, organized, assigned, supervised, and reviewed the work of professionals and technical consultants, including but not limited to lawyers, architects, engineers, construction managers, environmental consultants, and myriad of specialists
• Created and maintained detailed project pro-formas, consistently delivered projects on or under budget • Successfully negotiated, facilitated, and closed complex real estate transactions involving multiple public and private sources of funds, including LIHTC, TE Bonds, Project Based Section 8, HUD recapitalization, HCD AB 1699 recapitalization, ground leases, city funds, seller carryback, and local agency ground leases • Sought and obtained debt, equity and public financing; negotiated financing terms, regulatory agreements, and other contracts
• Managed real estate and finance transactions including site and property acquisitions, construction, permanent loan closings and tax credit equity syndications • Maintained and established new relationships with government officials, community organizations, project stakeholders, lenders, and investors
• Managed design and construction team from initial scoping, schematic design and design development through construction
• Navigated projects through complex legal and regulatory landscapes; monitored possible changes in laws, regulations, and policy that may affect projects

7 of 114

• Developed and prepared a variety of applications for project developments including financing applications, planning applications, permits, maps and documents on housing development operations and activities; submit documents to local jurisdictions for endorsement. • Supervised and mentored junior development staff
First Community Housing ▪ San Jose, CA ▪ October 2014 to April 2015 Assistant Project Manager
• Worked closely with senior management to successfully facilitate the development of several affordable housing developments in Santa Clara County

City of San Jose Housing Department ▪ San Jose, CA ▪ April 2014 to October 2014 Policy Intern
• Collaborated with the Department Director in the research and development of a policy whitepaper on the administrative status of California's Housing Successor Agencies • Provided administrative and research support in the development and of major plans, including 2014 - 22 Housing Element;

Resources for Community Development▪ Berkeley, CA ▪ June 2012 to Sept 2013 • Supported and collaborated with senior management to successfully facilitate the development of several affordable housing developments in the Alameda, Contra Costa, and Marin Counties

Education & Honors
Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, UC Berkeley, with honors, 2011 Leadership Council of San Mateo County, “Emerging Leaders”, Class of 2025, Anticipated completion June 2025

Miscellaneous
Sole investor/ owner in an Oakland fourplex, since March of 2021

8 of 114

CITY OF SAN MATEO

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Name: Aidin Rezaei Sarabi
Email:

Primary
Phone:

Address: San Mateo
Street City Zip Code
San Mateo resident
since: 2023 I am a registered voter in City of San Mateo: Yes Board or Commission interested in serving on (check all that apply):

Did you attend a meeting for this Board or
Commission?: Yes

QUALIFICATIONS
My qualifications for serving on this board/commission are as follows: As the Director of Capital Programs and Construction for SFMTA, I bring extensive experience in urban development, infrastructure planning, and project delivery, which directly aligns with the responsibilities of the Planning Commission. My qualifications include: 1. Expertise in Land Use and Infrastructure Development o I have overseen major capital projects that require coordination between public agencies, private developers, and community stakeholders. o My experience ensures that projects are designed and executed with a balance of functionality, sustainability, and long-term urban planning goals. 2. Strong Knowledge of Development, and Transportation Integration o Having worked on large-scale infrastructure, I understand the critical relationship between land use decisions, mobility, and urban growth. o I am well-versed in environmental reviews, and policy frameworks that shape city planning. 3. Proven Leadership in Project Delivery and Public Engagement o I have led complex, multi-stakeholder projects, managing teams and budgets while ensuring projects align with community needs and regulatory requirements. o My role requires engagement with government agencies, business leaders, and the public, fostering collaboration to achieve sustainable and equitable development outcomes. 4. Commitment to Smart Growth and Sustainability o I advocate for forward-thinking planning policies that promote livable, walkable, and transit-friendly communities. o My experience in infrastructure improvements ensures that new developments are supported by resilient, well-maintained public services. 5. Dedication to San Mateo’s Future o As a San Mateo resident, I am invested in the city’s long-term success and want to contribute my expertise to thoughtful growth, economic development, and housing solutions that serve the community. With my background in capital project management, infrastructure development, and public service, I am well-equipped to serve on the Planning Commission and contribute to strategic, data-driven, and community-focused decision-making.

I want to serve on this board/commission because: As a San Mateo resident, I am invested in the city’s long-term success and want to contribute my expertise to thoughtful growth, economic development, and housing solutions that serve the community.

Please list any other background information (business, education, community involvement) which might be useful in considering your appointment and attach a resume: I am also a Licensed Engineer and have 2 Masters Degrees in Civil Engineering

9 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]
Graduate of:

By checking the box below, I hereby certify that all statements made in this application are true and I authorize investigation of all matters contained in the application. I acknowledge that any false statements or misrepresentation on this application will be cause for refusal of placement or immediate dismissal at any time during the period of my placement. I understand that the City of San Mateo is an Equal Opportunity Employer and this application is public.

Certified/Agreed
2025-04-03
Submitted By Date

10 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
As a Planning Commissioner, my role would be to ensure that land use decisions align with the General Plan’s goals, balancing economic development, housing needs, environmental protection, and community character. I would also be committed to engaging the community and considering diverse perspectives to make informed, forward-thinking recommendations that shape a sustainable and inclusive future for San Mateo.The General Plan is the foundational policy document that guides the long-term vision for San Mateo’s growth, development, and land use. It serves as a blueprint for decision-making on zoning, housing, transportation, infrastructure, environmental sustainability, and community amenities. The General Plan ensures that development aligns with the city’s goals for economic vitality, livability, and environmental stewardship while balancing the needs of residents, businesses, and future generations.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
California’s housing crisis requires cities like San Mateo to balance state-mandated housing requirements with local priorities and community concerns. As a Planning Commissioner, I would ensure that new developments align with state laws while also promoting smart, sustainable growth that enhances San Mateo’s livability. This means advocating for housing solutions that are well-integrated with transportation, infrastructure, and community services, ensuring that growth does not outpace the city's capacity. Engaging the public in open, transparent discussions will be key to shaping projects that meet housing needs while maintaining the character of our neighborhoods. While I have personal perspectives on housing, my role would be to make objective, policy-driven decisions that serve the best interests of the entire community. I would take a pragmatic approach, prioritizing affordability, mixed- use developments, and sustainable planning while ensuring that the voices of San Mateans are heard.

Growth is inevitable, but with careful planning and collaboration, we can create housing solutions that work for both current and future residents.

11 of 114

12 of 114

Contract Documents (PS&E package), Implementation stage and close-outs - Managing Budget, Scope, and Schedule of both design and construction of HMC2 contracts utilizing different application including MAXIMO (ASSET Management tool), Primavera 6 (Scheduling and Resource Allocation/Management Application), ASANA (Task Manager Application), etc.
- Prepared and submitted a Grant Application, Funding Request/Reports, Earned Value reports, Recovery/Dynamic Risk Management Reports, Cost/Benefit Analysis, Lifecycle Cost Analysis, Change Requests/Justifications etc.
- Managed and minimized Covid-19 impacts on the project through creative cost saving strategies - Managing ongoing construction by in-house forces with limited funding due to Covid19 - Leading Environmental study to prepare CEQA and NEPA documents per State and Federal regulations
- Leading coordination with US. Army Corps, Department of Fish and Wildlife and Reginal Water Quality Control Board to avoid, mitigate and manage the environmental impacts of the project - Regular Reporting on cash flow, earned value, budget status and forecasts to FTA and PMOC - In charge of program dynamic risk registry matrix and risk assessment - Conducted Value Engineering per FTA regulation on $300M project

• Project Manager, Infrastructure Project Management Division (IPMD), Washington DC Department of Transportation December 2012 – 2020

Key Projects Completed:

- Capitol Crossing Project (3rd Street Tunnel, F & G Street Bridges) – Managed Design $30M - Monroe Street Bridge N.E. – Managed Design & Construction $2.5M & $12M - Rehabilitation of 1 st Street Project from Mass. Avenue to G Street – Managed Design & Construction $15M
- Reconstruction of 1st Street N.E. from G Street to New York Avenue – Managed Construction $3M - Rhode Island Streetscape Project – Managed Design $3M - H Street Bridge N.E. Project – Prepared Design-Build RFQ package - Updating DDOT Design Engineering Manual- Author of chapter 6 “Value Engineering” - Served as Value Engineering Coordinator for the Department 2015-2020

• Research Assistant, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania October 2009 – October2011

- Applied engineering knowledge to develop, calculate and test mathematical models for civil engineering applications,
- Used Statistics applications to model engineering problems, Integrate, summarize and synthesize data from a variety of sources (e.g. FHWA,FARS) to research, and preparing concise and accurate engineering reports.

• Office Engineer, WSP (Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc.) California, May 2008 –August 2009

Key Projects: First Street Bridge over the Napa River, Napa, California; North Connector Project Phase 1 and Phase 2, Fairfield, California
Assisted in submittal reviews, prepared pay quantity calculations, prepared monthly progress pay estimates, processed change orders and claims, stormwater management inspection, processed material

13 of 114

testing requests, prepared contract change orders, processed survey requests, project documentation, maintained project files, and tracked labor compliances • Construction Site Supervisor, Tehran, Iran, 2004-2007 Managed all construction activities of a petrochemical factory of new and existing products; sign-offs of job/task completion for payment to sub-contractors, record keeping of project tasks, material usage, and inventory; inspected completed works for compliance; evaluated contractors’ change orders; critical path planning for project management; and also managed the safety certification program

RELEVANT SKILLS

Computer Skills: Microsoft Word, Excel, Power Point, MicroStation V8, AutoCad, SketchUP, Highway Capacity Software, Synchro, SimTraffic, Primavera P6, Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP), Microsoft Project, ArcGIS
AWARDS

• Engineering Excellence Honor Award for the Design of Monroe Street Bridge NE, Washington DC by ACEC 2019
• Excellence Honor Award for Construction of Monroe Street Bridge NE, Washington DC by Heavy Construction Contractors Association 2019
• Engineering Excellence Honor Award for the Design of First Street NE, Washington DC also recognized by President Obama and President Biden in May 2014

PUBLICATIONS
• Aidin Rezaei Sarabi and Philip Garvey, Evaluation of the Use of Registration Stickers, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation – DOT Reports, April 2010
• Aidin R.Sarabi and Kambyz Behnia. Application of Geosynthetics in roads, Engineering Journal, University of Tehran, June 2007

REFERENCES

References available upon request

14 of 114

15 of 114

CITY OF SAN MATEO

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Name: Vikash Bhagwandin
Email:

Primary
Phone:

Address: San Mateo
Street City Zip Code
San Mateo resident
since: 1972 I am a registered voter in City of San Mateo: Yes Board or Commission interested in serving on (check all that apply):

Did you attend a meeting for this Board or
Commission?: Yes

QUALIFICATIONS
My qualifications for serving on this board/commission are as follows: I have been involved in the planning, build-out and launch of biotech startup companies. I am knowledgable with the General plan of San Mateo, have attended study sessions, and well informed by the community. I am familiar with local ordinances, state and federal regulations.

I want to serve on this board/commission because: As resident of 52 years, born and raised, I have seen San Mateo evolve wonderfully, and now I would like to help with the growth of the city and prosperity of the residents, in a fair, diverse, equitable, inclusive, and responsible manner while maintaining the charm and deep history of San Mateo.

Please list any other background information (business, education, community involvement) which might be useful in considering your appointment and attach a resume: Actively involved in the proper and safe implementation of 5G Towers, responsible housing through Measure T, Bayside Bus Depot, Third and Norfolk traffic problem and bike lanes, and currently the proposed 101/92 freeway exchange.

Graduate of:

16 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

Certified/Agreed
2025-04-02
Submitted By Date

17 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
General Plan outlines several improvements to the city, a major part implements the development of affordable housing to help with the statewide housing crisis. It complies with a state mandated housing requirement. It tasks city officials to work with landowners for the development of affordable housing in a safe and responsible manner, as well as a supportive infrastructure.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
I would make sure that all development proposals comply with the state mandated RHNA numbers. My personal view would only be a factor in my decision if there was a concern of safety, land stability, traffic, pollution or environmental impacts.

18 of 114

19 of 114

• Oncogenes (KRAS, MYC, PI3K, Akt, MEK, ERK) and Tumor suppressors (loss of p53, Rb, p16) • Hedgehog signaling (SMO, PTC, GLI)
• Receptor tyrosine kinase signaling (EGF/EGFR, HGF/c-MET, KitL/c-Kit, VEGF/VEGFR) • Resistance mechanisms (MDR1/ABCB1, BCRP/ABCG2, MRP1/ABCC1) Doctoral Student, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center 2003-2008 Advisors: Jerry W. Shay Ph.D., Vice Chair & Professor of Cell Biology Woodring E. Wright, M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Cell Biology Grant support: Lung Cancer SPORE grant, NASA-NSCOR Space RadiaRon grant • Pancrea=c cancer stem cells (PDAC). Metastasis, chemoresistance, telomere biology, and DNA damage response. Bhagwandin et al. 2016, PLoS One.
• Immortaliza=on, characteriza=on of a pheochromocytoma cell line. Bhagwandin et al. 2013, PLoS One. • Geron corp.: Evalua=on of GRN163L (Imetelstat) in a xenograa model of lung cancer. Dikmen et al. 2005. • In Vivo Imaging Modality: Time resolved 3-D light emission tomography Undergraduate Student, University of California Santa Cruz 1994 - 1998 Summer Internships & Independent Field Studies
• Geron Corp.: Inhibi=on of cancers with GRN163 now FDA approved Imetelstat. • Dendreon Corp.: Dendri=c cell therapy in cancer led toFDA approved Provenge. • Genentech Inc.: Cloned the Human Hedgehog Receptor Smoothened (Smo) led to Vismodegib. • Tularik Inc.: Baculovirus expression and puriﬁca=on of STAT4 and STAT6 • Cell Genensys Inc.: Expression proﬁling of cytokines involved in Muscular Dystrophy

EDUCATION
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX Doctorate of Philosophy, Cancer Biology - April 2008
University of California, Santa Cruz
Bachelor of Arts, Biochemistry & Pharmacology - December 1998

SKILLS SUMMARY
Cell Biology
• Cell-based assays: cytotoxicity assays (MTT/XTT and cell =ter glow), drug eﬄux assays, gene reporter. • Cancer Biology: Clonogenic assays in 2-D or 3-D (soa agar), 3-D organoids, Boyden Chamber assays. • Isola=on and culture of primary cancer cell culture and cancer stem cell biology. • Cellular engineering by len=viral transduc=on, retrovirus, len=virus, adenovirus • Immunoassays: Incucyte, ELISA, ELISPOT, Luminex & MESOSCALE (MSD).

In Vivo Pharmacology (Mouse Tumor Models)
• Gene=cally engineered mouse models (GEMMs) of tumorigenesis and progression. • Cell line derived (CDX) and ex vivo pa=ent derived (PDX) xenograa models and orthotopic models. • Delivery methods: IV, IP and IM injec=on, oral gavage, Intranasal (aerosoliza=on). • Tumor progression and metastasis by bioluminescence imaging with Xenogen IVIS system.

Histopathology and Microscopy
Vikash J. Bhagwandin, PhD Page of 2 3

20 of 114

• General epiﬂuorescence and confocal microscopy on Zeiss, Olympus, Leica, and Nikon. • Colorimetric and ﬂuorescence based IHC analysis using the Aperio digital slide scanning system. • Immunocytochemistry (ICC), Immunohistochemistry (IHC), apoptosis (TUNEL, cleaved caspase-3), prolifera=on (BrdU, Ki67), many oncology targets, receptors, and cell signaling pathway factors.

Biochemistry/Molecular Biology
• Protein expression systems & puriﬁca=on from bacterial, yeast, insect cells, and mammalian cells for an=bodies, enzymes, and cellular factors. Study of protease biochemistry and tumor microenvironment proteins. Enzyme kine=cs, substrate and inhibitor proﬁling. • General cloning, Gibson assembly for an=body cloning, PCR cloning, phage cloning, sub-cloning • Real-=me qPCR, RT-PCR, bulk NGS, single cell NGS, RNAseq, siRNA, shRNA, miRNA screens • Protein assays; western blots, chroma=n IP (ChIP)
• Transcrip=on factors: EMSA, luciferase reporter and lacZ reporter

PUBLICATIONS

1. Bhagwandin VJ (OncoStemyx), An=fungals; Itraconazole and Posaconazole induce synthe=c lethality through MYC and Glutathione Pathway sensi=zing chemoresistant cancer cells to Vinca Alkaloids and Taxanes. (In Prep).

2. Bhagwandin VJ (Bishop lab); KIT proto-oncogene supports the development of RAS induced lung tumors. (In prep).

3. Bhagwandin VJ, Bishop JM, Wright WE, Shay JW; The Metasta=c Poten=al and Chemoresistance of Human Pancrea=c Cancer Stem Cells. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 9;11(2):e148807

4. Co-ﬁrst author: Ghayee HK*, Bhagwandin VJ*, Stastny V, Click A, Ding Liang-Hao, Mizrachi Dario, Zou YS, Chari R, Lam WL, Bachoo RM, Smith AL, Story MD, Sidhu S, Robinson BG, Nwariaku FE, Gazdar AF, Auchus RJ, Shay JW; Progenitor Cell Line (hPheo1) Derived from a Human Pheochromocytoma Tumor. PLoS One. 2013 June;8(6):e65624.

5. Sennino B, Ishiguro-Oonuma T, Wei Y , Naylor RM, Williamson C, Bhagwandin VJ, Tabruyn SP , You W, Chapman HA, Christensen JG, Aaab DT, McDonald DM; Suppression of Tumor Invasion and Metastasis by Concurrent Inhibi=on of c-Met and VEGF Signaling in Pancrea=c Neuroendocrine Tumors. Cancer Discovery. 2012 Mar;2(3):270-87

6. Bhagwandin VJ and Shay JW; Pancrea=c Cancer Stem Cells: fact or ﬁc=on? Biochimica et Biophysica Acta: Molecular Basis of Disease; Review. 2009 Apr;1792(4):248-59.

7. Trivedi NN, Tong Q, Raman K, Bhagwandin VJ, Caughey GH; Mast cell alpha and beta tryptases changed rapidly during primate specia=on and evolved from gamma-like transmembrane pep=dases in ancestral vertebrates. J Immunol. 2007 Nov;179(9):6072-9.

8. Tong ZY , Illek B, Bhagwandin VJ, Verghese GM, Caughey GH; Prostasin, a membrane-anchored serine pep=dase, regulates sodium currents in JME/CF15 cells, a cys=c ﬁbrosis airway epithelial cell line. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2004 Nov;287(5):L928-35

9. Verghese GM, Tong ZY , Bhagwandin VJ, and Caughey GH; Mouse Prostasin Gene Structure, Promoter Analysis, and Restricted Expression in Lung and Kidney. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2004 Apr;30(4):519-29

10.Bhagwandin VJ, Hau LWT, Mallen-St. Clair J, Wolters PJ, Caughey GH; Structure and Ac=vity of Human Pancreasin, a Novel Tryp=c Serine Pep=dase Expressed Primarily by the Pancreas. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2003 Jan;278(5):3363-3371 Vikash J. Bhagwandin, PhD Page of 3 3

21 of 114

CITY OF SAN MATEO

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Name: Kathryn Weingand
Email:

Primary
Phone:

Address: San Mateo
Street City Zip Code
San Mateo resident
since: 1994 I am a registered voter in City of San Mateo: Yes Board or Commission interested in serving on (check all that apply):

Did you attend a meeting for this Board or
Commission?: No

QUALIFICATIONS
My qualifications for serving on this board/commission are as follows: I am the owner of 3 properties in North Central and know everyone on my block where we talk about our concerns regularly. I am not a contractor or developer and I feel that they need input from someone who is not a developer or contractor. I have a good understanding of what the residents of this city need to have a good quality of life and find good jobs and services.

I want to serve on this board/commission because: I want to help shape San Mateo as a place that people want to live and feel happy. I am well aware of the problems in my neighborhood. I want to help shape this city to be aesthetically pleasing and have a functioning traffic flow.

Please list any other background information (business, education, community involvement) which might be useful in considering your appointment and attach a resume: I am a college professor and was a high school teacher for 30 years at Sequoia High School. I have a masters from SFSU and I have been a high school coach in the SMUHSD. I am a longtime user of the recreation department inn San Mateo. I am a landlord and own 3 properties in North Central, yet my concerns are always with the quality of life that San Mateo offers and not my personal gain. I have a good understanding of homeownership, property values in the city and the rental market.

Graduate of:

22 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

Certified/Agreed
2025-03-31
Submitted By Date

23 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
I believe that San Mateo should remain a quality place to live and they need the input of someone who is not a developer and truly cares about the quality of life that we offer living here. I understand that the city must follow the guidelines of the state and federal government and that is a big part of what is driving the city plan.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
Affordable housing is a hot topic. I can easily weigh the benefits of a proposed project and if it benefits affordable housing or not. I live in a very dense neighborhood and understand the daily challenges of how a project benefits or disadvantages the city and its benefits to the residents. I would clearly weigh the benefits to public services when looking at a plan and development. Data and what residents need should be an important part of decision making.

24 of 114

CITY OF SAN MATEO

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Name: Adam Nugent
Email:

Primary
Phone:

Address: San Mateo
Street City Zip Code
San Mateo resident
since: 2018 I am a registered voter in City of San Mateo: Yes Board or Commission interested in serving on (check all that apply):

Did you attend a meeting for this Board or
Commission?: Yes

QUALIFICATIONS
My qualifications for serving on this board/commission are as follows: My background as a Landscape Architect provides a strong foundation for serving on the Planning Commission. I have dedicated my career to studying and implementing best practices in sustainable planning and urban design, focusing on creating enduring places that enhance community well-being. My professional work and education have given me a deep understanding of the intricate relationship between city finances, infrastructure, and land use decisions, as well as the psychological impact of aesthetics in the built environment. Working with diverse clients and their neighbors on landscape changes has honed my ability to navigate complex situations, manage expectations, and effectively balance competing interests. I am adept at facilitating collaborative solutions that aim to satisfy multiple stakeholders – a skill directly applicable to the varied perspectives encountered on the Planning Commission. My professional experience spans landscape architecture, planning, and architecture, providing me with a comprehensive understanding of how local ordinances translate into physical development. I have firsthand familiarity with the practical application of our laws in shaping the structure and function of our city through completed projects. My graduate studies in Germany provided an international perspective on urban design history, advanced planning best practices, green building technologies, and contemporary scholarship on long-term sustainability and environmental equity. Beyond my professional expertise, I bring a strong track record of leadership and service. As a commissioned officer in the U.S. Army, I led soldiers in challenging environments, developing discipline, humility, and the ability to quickly master complex systems and train others. This experience instilled in me the capacity to unite groups behind a common mission, even with limited resources and under pressure – skills vital for effective commission work. Currently, I serve as the President of the Home Association of North Central San Mateo (HANCSM) and have actively organized and participated in multiple General Plan and Public Works engagement meetings in the North Central Neighborhood. This role has deepened my understanding of local community concerns and the importance of public participation in the planning process. As a licensed landscape architect, a veteran, a homeowner, and an engaged community leader through my work with HANCSM, I am deeply invested in the future of San Mateo. My unique blend of professional expertise, leadership experience, and demonstrated commitment to community engagement makes me a highly qualified candidate for reappointment to the Planning Commission.

25 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]
I want to serve on this board/commission because: I am passionate about creating great places and vibrant communities – a focus that has defined my professional life as a Landscape Architect. Having dedicated my career to studying sustainable development and urban best practices, I am eager to volunteer my broad professional and lived experience to benefit San Mateo. I want to serve on the Planning Commission to help guide San Mateo in becoming a leader in 21st- century urban planning, ensuring it lives up to its vision and values. The city faces critical, interconnected challenges in environmental sustainability, financial resilience, and social equity. My goal is to contribute to planning decisions that address these challenges proactively, securing a future where current and future generations can thrive in a beloved city with widespread prosperity. Specifically, I am driven to help the commission: Advance Environmental Sustainability: By promoting planning and design that supports carbon neutrality, enhances our urban ecosystem, and creates healthy, livable spaces with a balance of walkability and necessary infrastructure. Foster Financial Resilience: By supporting development patterns that generate a sufficient tax base to fund essential city services and infrastructure, while simultaneously ensuring San Mateo remains an attractive and affordable place to live and work across generations.

Champion Social Equity: By advocating for planning decisions that address historical disparities and promote context- sensitive growth, ensuring equitable access to housing, opportunity, and a high quality of life for all residents, regardless of background or neighborhood. I believe my unique blend of professional expertise, commitment to sustainability, and deep understanding of the interplay between design, finance, and community well-being can make a significant contribution to the commission's vital work in shaping San Mateo's future.

Please list any other background information (business, education, community involvement) which might be useful in considering your appointment and attach a resume: In addition to the qualifications previously outlined, here is a summary of relevant background information: Professional Experience: I am a licensed Landscape Architect with hands-on experience leading a design studio on the Peninsula. My work has included directly entitling projects within the city of San Mateo. This experience provides me with practical knowledge of local development processes, city ordinances, and the realities of implementing planning decisions on the ground. It has also honed my skills in working with diverse stakeholders and managing complex projects. Education: I hold a Master's Degree in Landscape Architecture. My graduate studies included time studying and teaching in Bonn, Germany, where I gained valuable international perspectives on urban design history, sustainable planning best practices, and contemporary environmental research.

This academic background provides a strong theoretical foundation for understanding complex planning challenges.

Leadership and Service: I served as a Captain in the U.S. Army, where I was responsible for leading the tactical operations of a PATRIOT Air Defense Artillery Battalion. This included wartime deployments across three Middle Eastern countries. This experience developed strong leadership, decision-making, and organizational skills, as well as the ability to perform effectively under pressure and unite teams towards a common goal. Community Involvement: I am actively involved in the San Mateo community, currently serving as the President of the Home Association of North Central San Mateo (HANCSM). In this role, I have gained significant experience in community organizing and facilitating outreach. My involvement in multiple General Plan and Public Works engagement meetings has further deepened my understanding of resident concerns and the importance of public participation in city planning. This diverse background across professional practice, academic study, military leadership, and local community engagement provides me with a unique and valuable perspective for serving on the Planning Commission.

Graduate of:City Services Academy 2019
By checking the box below, I hereby certify that all statements made in this application are true and I authorize investigation of all matters contained in the application. I acknowledge that any false statements or misrepresentation on this application will be cause for refusal of placement or immediate dismissal at any time during the period of my placement. I understand that the City of San Mateo is an Equal Opportunity Employer and this application is public.

Certified/Agreed
2025-05-01
Submitted By Date

26 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
My understanding of San Mateo's General Plan is extensive, informed by my professional background in landscape architecture and planning, my prior service on the Planning Commission, and my participation on the General Plan Subcommittee. The General Plan serves as the foundational document and long- range blueprint for San Mateo's physical development and resource management. It is the state- mandated constitution for the city’s future, legally guiding all land use decisions and shaping the built environment over the coming decades. The General Plan plays a critical role in nearly every aspect of the city's form and function: Directing Land Use and Development: It is the primary tool regulating where and how development can occur, directly influencing housing capacity, the cost of living, and the character of neighborhoods. Shaping the Built Environment and Quality of Life: Going beyond geometric regulations, the plan guides urban design, the city’s transportation networks, and the provision of public spaces. It determines everything from walkability and accessibility to the psychological well-being and happiness of residents. A well-planned city, like a maturing park or arboretum, improves over time in livability and beauty. Ensuring Financial Sustainability: Land use decisions guided by the plan significantly impact land values and the resulting property tax base, which is essential for funding city services and maintaining infrastructure into the future. The plan's approach to managing land use determines whether our city’s high land values translate into productive growth or exacerbate housing affordability issues. Integrating Infrastructure: The Plan guides the development of transportation infrastructure and the use of public rights-of-way, directly impacting residents' access to jobs, services, and recreation.

Promoting Resilience and Adaptability: Ultimately, the General Plan dictates whether San Mateo can attract businesses and residents, successfully manage economic fluctuations, and adapt to future challenges like climate change and demographic changes. It guides zoning codes, environmental hazard mitigation, and overall urban resilience. Drawing from my academic study of urban planning and my professional design practice, I see the General Plan not just as a regulatory document, but as the core strategy for ensuring San Mateo's long-term environmental, economic, and social vitality.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
Balancing state housing mandates with diverse community interests and planning for future needs is one of the most critical and challenging aspects of serving on the Planning Commission in the current environment. My approach is grounded in understanding the legal framework, prioritizing the long-term health and equity of the city as a whole, and ensuring a transparent and informed decision-making process. When reviewing development proposals, I would balance these competing interests by:

Adhering to State Law and the General Plan: Recognizing that state legislation limits local discretion in certain areas, I would ensure decisions comply with state mandates promoting housing while leveraging the guidance and flexibility provided by San Mateo's recently adopted General Plan. The General Plan is our community's roadmap for accommodating growth responsibly and equally; it is the appropriate tool

27 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]
to guide how we meet housing needs while respecting neighborhood context. Prioritizing Evidence- Based Planning and Design: I believe the most effective way to navigate conflicting views is by grounding decisions in best practices for urban planning and design. This includes advocating for and applying objective design and planning standards, potentially through tools like form-based codes. Such standards, based on what creates safe, attractive, and walkable urban environments, provide predictability for both residents and developers, reducing subjective conflict and enhancing trust in the process. Actively Weighing Community Input within the Legal Framework: Community input is vital and provides essential local context. I would listen carefully to resident concerns, understand varying perspectives, and empathize with the impacts of change. My role would be to weigh this input against the requirements of state law, the policies of the General Plan, and the potential benefits a project offers to the city's overall housing and planning goals, clearly articulating where the Commission's discretion is limited. Promoting Equity and Long-Term Community Benefit: My decisions would be guided by the principle of affirmatively furthering fair housing and ensuring that growth contributes to a more equitable and inclusive San Mateo. This means supporting projects that increase housing opportunity, particularly for historically excluded populations, and ensuring that the benefits of new development are shared across the community, without unduly burdening existing residents or diminishing the quality of established neighborhoods. My personal view, shaped by my professional expertise in creating sustainable and thriving places, my understanding of urban systems (including the critical link between land use, finance, and well-being), and my commitment to community service, factors into my decisions by providing a framework for evaluating proposals based on their potential to contribute to a high-quality, equitable, and resilient city. I am particularly focused on ensuring that development enhances the public realm, integrates well with existing neighborhoods through high- quality design, and actively works towards the environmental and social sustainability goals outlined in our General Plan. Ultimately, I believe the Planning Commission's role is to make informed, transparent decisions that fulfill our legal obligations while strategically shaping San Mateo's built environment to enhance the quality of life and opportunity for all residents, now and in the future. This requires a commitment to evidence-based practices, and a sincere effort to balance diverse interests within the mandates we operate under.

28 of 114

29 of 114

• Designed landscapes for institutional projects including schools, long-term care facilities, and developmentally supportive housing, emphasizing functional and supportive environments. • Produced and administered the ﬁrm’s website, demonstrating technical skills in web development (HTML/CSS).

Graduate Assistant Teacher, Texas A&M University; College Station, TX and Bonn, Germany | 2010-2012:
• Instructed, evaluated, and mentored over 60 undergraduate students in Landscape Architecture and Urban & Regional Sciences programs.
• Co-taught design studio courses, led critiques, and evaluated design projects, fostering critical thinking and design skills.
• Evaluated and instructed diverse coursework, including site engineering, ethics, and professional practice in urban planning.
• Co-taught and managed the department’s international program in Germany, mentoring students through semester-long European independent studies focusing on urbanism and planning.

Commissioned U.S. Army Ofﬁcer / Battalion Tactical Director; Ft. Bliss, TX & Southwest Asia (Operation Enduring Freedom) | 2007-2009
Platoon Leader and Battery Tactical Control Ofﬁcer, U.S. Army; Ft. Bliss, TX | 2006-2007 • As a Captain, led the tactical execution and readiness training for a PATRIOT Missile Air Defense Artillery Battalion supporting U.S. Central Command strategic objectives across three Middle Eastern countries.
• Directed real-time air defense engagements and prioritized targets while coordinating extensively with other military branches to deconﬂict friendly and neutral aircraft. • Planned complex anti-tactical missile defense deployments, including communications architecture, command and control schemes, and radar/missile placement. • Trained, certiﬁed, and validated the proﬁciency of 18 tactical control crews for deployment, signiﬁcantly exceeding standard requirements and demonstrating exceptional training leadership.
• Integrated and maintained a secure, redundant communications network across multiple countries, ensuring continuous operational capability.

EDUCATION & TRAINING
Texas A&M University; College Station, TX — 2012
Master of Landscape Architecture, University Olmsted Scholar, Tau Sigma Delta U.S. Army Ofﬁcer Candidate School; Fort Benning, GA — 2005 Commissioned 2nd Lieutenant, U.S. Army
Augsburg College; Minneapolis, MN — 2004
Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy, Summa Cum Laude

LICENSES & CERTIFICATIONS
Licensed Landscape Architect, California (#6269)

30 of 114

31 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

Certified/Agreed
2025-05-01
Submitted By Date

32 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
The General Plan is the guiding document for all land use planning in the City through 2040. My understanding is the General Plan sets higher level, long term policy and guidance for land use planning that dictates the on-the-ground (no pun intended) land use planning that will happen in the City through 2040. All planning decisions have to conform with the General Plan but it leaves lots of room for flexibility within its mandates. It sets parameters on the eight mandated and handful of optional areas or elements within it.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
Well, the first question I'd ask is what are our legal options. It's not typically an option to ignore state mandates, and so if the state is mandating a particular decision, then that is what we'd be compelled to do. But to the extent there is flexibility or discretion in the decisions we'd be making, I think your role as a public servant is to listen to the community and weigh that in your decisionmaking, but also to recognize that no everyone in the community speaks up, and there may be portions of the community whose perspectives are under-represented. Once selected as a commissioner, your job is to listen with an open mind to all of the input (be it from staff, community, other commissioners), ask the right questions, truly consider the options, and then ultimately use your own informed judgment to make the decision you think will be best for your community--not only now but in the future. My personal opinion is that it is a simple reality that our current land use planning on the Peninsula is not sustainable. we have to have more housing, we have to have better transportation options, and we have to find ways to allow folks from all walks of life to live here. We also have to recognize that revenue from offices/businesses are an absolutely critical part of our City's general fund each year, and so we have to work to find ways to balance the urgent need for housing with the need for continued/commensurate revenue/jobs. I also now live in a single-family neighborhood in parkside, and so I understand the compulsion to protect single-family homes at all costs and to want to direct our efforts to build up housing in the transportation corridors. I'd bring all of this to bear in my role as a commissioner, and I am sure I have so much more to learn, so my opinions certainly will develop and grow as I learn more.

33 of 114

1 Caiti Busch

EXPERIENCE
SAN MATEO COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Deputy County Attorney Jan. 2022 – Present • Advise County clients on all legal issues that arise, including regulatory and statutory compliance, litigation, contracting, and policy. Clients include Environmental Health, the Controller, the Public Guardian, and County commissions, including Commission on the Status of Women and LGBTQIA+ Commission. • Represent County in wide-ranging civil litigation, including employment matters, dangerous conditions cases, and civil rights suits.
• Serve on Office Equity Team.

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP, Associate Summer 2016, Fall 2017 – Summer 2018, Fall 2020 – Jan. 2022 • Represented clients in diverse range of complex litigation. Distilled complicated legal issues and applied law to facts in filed motions, advisory memoranda, and oral presentations. • Interfaced with clients, opposing counsel, witnesses, and experts. Lead fact development and synthesized data and documents. Managed teams to complete tasks proactively. • Maintained an active pro bono practice and served as one of two 2021 Summer Associate Program Coordinators. Co-founded and co-led office-wide diversity book club.

SANTA CLARA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Summer Law Clerk Summer 2015 • Drafted and argued filed motions, including examining witnesses on both direct and cross.

JUDICIAL CLERKSHIPS
HON. LEONDRA R. KRUGER, THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA Fall 2019 – Fall 2020 • Member of Supreme Court Equity & Inclusion Committee.

HON. BETH LABSON FREEMAN, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Fall 2018 – Fall 2019

EDUCATION
STANFORD LAW SCHOOL, Juris Doctor, 2017
Honors: High Pro Bono Distinction; Class Prize (top 1–2 students in class): Criminal Law, Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, and Constitutional Litigation
Journals: Stanford Law Review, Executive Editor (2016–17), Member Editor (2015–16) Activities: OutLaw, Co-President (2015–16); Stanford Women in Politics; Stanford Moot Court Competition (2017); UCLA Williams Institute Moot Court Competition (2016); Volunteer Alternative Spring Break (2015, 2017) ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, M.S. Biology (Biology and Society), May 2014 Certificate in Responsible Innovation in Science, Engineering, and Society, May 2014

TRINITY UNIVERSITY, B.S., magna cum laude, Biology, Religion, Minor in Biomathematics, May 2011 Honors: Murchison Scholarship; Ethel Evans Religion Scholarship; CoSIDA/ESPN Academic All-American Activities: Varsity Volleyball, Captain (2009, 2010)

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
Chair, Foundation for San Mateo County Libraries; Vice Chair, City of San Mateo Personnel Board; Co-Chair, San Mateo County Stonewall Democrats; Graduate, 2019 San Mateo City Services Academy

INTERESTS
Reading the “100 Novels to Read Before You Die”; The New York Times Crossword; LGBTQ+ Representation in Media; Hiking in San Mateo County

34 of 114

CITY OF SAN MATEO

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Name: Kevin Simpson
Email:

Primary
Phone:

Address: San Mateo
Street City Zip Code
San Mateo resident
since: 2008 I am a registered voter in City of San Mateo: Yes Board or Commission interested in serving on (check all that apply):

Did you attend a meeting for this Board or
Commission?: Yes

QUALIFICATIONS
My qualifications for serving on this board/commission are as follows: I am closely involved in day to day city issues and actively participate in or monitor Council meetings, commission and board meetings, hearings, neighborhood meetings and forums. I have been deeply engaged in downtown issues and have worked closely with DSMA, SM Chamber, and even founded a local civic group to advocate for downtown and B Street improvements. I have been closely involved in walk and bike friendly issues. I have at times engaged directly with developers including Prometheus, the former Windy Hill and Harvest to advocate for investment in downtown livability. I understand the tightrope that the city and its agencies walk in both complying with state, federal and county requirements as well as mapping and executing on its own future and responding to the invariably competing desires and opinions of the city. I consider myself an open minded but still opinionated person who strives to always learn more and advocate for the best possible San Mateo. I have over 30 years' experience in operations and financial decisions for a very successful tech startup. I have a background in government and policy making.

I want to serve on this board/commission because: We are in the middle of a turbulent time for the city that I love so much. The Planning Commission sits at the nexus of much of what will transpire in our city in terms of development of our built environment as well as the non-tangible qualities that can make or break whether San Mateo is a vibrant place where residents and visitors can thrive; or a city that fails to live up to its abundant promise. Careful consideration--within the framework of laws, our General Plan, and mandates--requires attention to detail, passion for getting the right information to make an informed decision or recommendation, and an eye or ear toward ensuring the needs and desire of rall residents and those who work, run a business or play here are weighed. I will always be looking for the best possible outcome within the range of possibilities.

Please list any other background information (business, education, community involvement) which might be useful in considering your appointment and attach a resume: -BA in Government with significant study in Studio Art and East Asian studies: Oberlin College, Oberlin, Ohio -20 years with Model N, a San Mateo based software company which I joined as one of its first employees and which grew to be the dominant market leader in Life Sciences Revenue Management. I played many roles spanning the entire business operation, including Services, Support, Go-to-Market, Renewals, and roles in HR incuding enablement and internal communications. -Board Member, San Mateo County Astronomy Society, focusing on public outreach such as star parties for the public throughout the county. -Cofounder of B Street Boosters, advocating for the establishment and blossoming of our Pedestrian Mall, working closely with Council, Merchants, City Staff, DSMA and SM Chamber.

Graduate of:

35 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

Certified/Agreed
2025-05-01
Submitted By Date

36 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
The General Plan serves as a foundation for mapping out how land and other assets will be used and developed or redeveloped for the plan period. It acts as a map stating where and what kind of development *can* happen; provides a set of assumptions about factors that will affect the city's development; maps the zoning plan for the city; and sets objectives that will enable the city to grow and thrive within a guided vision rather than haphazardly. It also and crucially serves as a public document to hold the city government and others accountable for decisions on the day to day and month to month level about projects and questions. It further guides other plans such as the Downtown specific plan, citywide and neighborhood plans like Complete Streets or Master Bicycle plans, etc. It serves as a vehicle for the city to design its future. It does NOT, however guarantee that any individual development, project or outcome will happen. It cannot force homes to be built, blocks to be redeveloped or park built. It is up to developers and individuals or businesses to actually generate the new homes, new businesses or redeveloped blocks or zones. And while it serves as the master plan, there is also capacity within that plan for individual and incremental changes to be made--such as parcel zoning to accommodate a project where necessary and within the general spirit of the plan, for example.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
My first instinct will always be to ask how the project stacks up in terms of providing housing and addressing the jobs/housing balance. I favor more housing and especially favor housing geared toward middle and lower income residents. I will scrutinize the balances within any project on that score.

Second and is how the proposed project impacts those around the project and those who will benefit from it in many and varied ways. Overlaying all of that is the straightforward but not always simple matter of what the law and our policy will permit, where we have discretion, and how that discretion can be used to get to the best possible outcome. I would try to leave my personal view aside. I think there is room to ask for excellence in what is proposed and where for example my personal view of the aesthetics of a project come into play, I'd express it but not insist on it especially when there is a variety of opinion. I would also, in deliberations and questions, always strive to bring the public along and help them understand the implications of any proposal and any decision or recommendation.

37 of 114

38 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

Certified/Agreed
2025-05-01
Submitted By Date

39 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
The General Plan is the guiding document for the community's long-range vision for future growth and development. The General Plan established policies and goals that serve as a framework for making decisions regarding housing, transportation, land-use and other community aspects.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
It is important to respect the state's mandates for increased housing while also respecting the character of existing communities. Although the city's current zoning does not fully align with the General Plan, new projects should integrate with existing communities through setbacks and enhanced connectivity and incorporate design objectives where applicable. Engaging the community early in the process and ensuring their perspectives are considered can go a long way toward building public support for new development.

40 of 114

CITY OF SAN MATEO

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Name: Rebecca Dun
Email:

Primary
Phone:

Address: San Mateo
Street City Zip Code
San Mateo resident
since: 2021 I am a registered voter in City of San Mateo: Yes Board or Commission interested in serving on (check all that apply):

Did you attend a meeting for this Board or
Commission?: Yes

QUALIFICATIONS
My qualifications for serving on this board/commission are as follows: My qualifications blend technical expertise, community engagement, and a deep commitment to San Mateo’s future. With five years as a software engineer in sustainability and fintech, I analyze complex problems and turn data into practical solutions. As a renter, daily transit rider, and community garden volunteer, I have firsthand insight into our city’s housing and infrastructure challenges. My advocacy includes drafting policy memos that helped advance the Klamath River dam removal-the first of its kind in the US. Participation in General Plan 2040 forums and ongoing study of land use policy history further shape my approach.

I’m passionate about inclusive, equitable growth and eager to help shape a resilient, thriving San Mateo.

I want to serve on this board/commission because: I want to serve because I care deeply about how policy shapes daily life in San Mateo, now and for future generations. My interest in housing policy goes beyond theory-I’ve attended Planning Commission meetings and studied city documents, and I’ve seen the impact of collaborative, solutions-oriented governance. These experiences inspired me to move from bystander to participant. I’m eager to contribute my skills and perspective to ensure our policies are equitable, well-informed, and responsive to the real needs of our community.

Please list any other background information (business, education, community involvement) which might be useful in considering your appointment and attach a resume: My STEM background gives me a rigorous, data-driven approach to problem-solving, but I recognize that numbers alone can’t capture the lived experiences of marginalized communities. I seek out works like The Color of Law and Murder State to better understand systemic inequities in housing and urban policy. This blend of technical expertise and social awareness shapes my advocacy for effective, just policies.

Volunteering with San Mateo Community Gardens and the Food Bank reflects my commitment to grassroots community building.

Graduate of:

41 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

Certified/Agreed
2025-05-02
Submitted By Date

42 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
The General Plan is San Mateo’s long-term roadmap that guides land use, housing, transportation, and community development. The 2040 General Plan establishes a vision for a diverse, equitable, and resilient city by setting priorities that balance growth with sustainability and inclusivity. The plan’s emphasis on expanding housing options, improving transit access, and preserving community amenities aligns with my values. When I reviewed the 2040 draft, I was encouraged by its strong commitment to equity and resilience, reflected in thoughtful policy recommendations. I’m inspired by the plan’s bold priorities and believe that, while progress may be incremental, we owe it to future residents to act with both urgency and care. The General Plan is a living document that requires ongoing collaboration to translate its policies into tangible improvements that reflect residents’ diverse needs.I look forward to collaborating with fellow commissioners to ensure amenities like libraries and community gardens are holistically accessible to all.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
Land use decisions have historically limited housing opportunities and reinforced inequities. To move forward, we must broaden engagement and ensure policies reflect the needs of the entire community.

San Mateo’s legacy of exclusionary zoning must be addressed thoughtfully for a more inclusive future.

Streamlining ADU and home expansion processes can help residents adapt while respecting neighborhood character. Community input is vital, but we must also proactively reach those not always present in public meetings. Decisions should reflect the full diversity of San Mateo-including future neighbors.

43 of 114

Rebecca Dun

Civil Engagement & Advocacy
● Drafted policy memos on sustainability, contributing to the US’s first dam removal project (Klamath river) ahead of schedule.
● Advocated for innovative climate solutions, including incentives for kelp farming and regenerative agriculture, through direct communication with state legislators. ● Participated in San Mateo General Plan 2040 forums (listening sessions and online); submitted written analysis on housing density and transit access to city planners.

Community Involvement
● Use of multi-modal public transit (walking, biking, Caltrain, BART, bus) to commute sustainably and reduce environmental impact
● Volunteer, San Mateo Community Gardens and San Francisco-Marin Food Bank ● Founded and moderated a Bay Area intern hiking group (10k+ members), organizing free, inclusive hike events for the community.
● Engaged San Mateo resident for housing affordability and quality of life as a renter.

Professional Experience
Software Development Engineer, Amazon AWS Infrastructure – Sustainability Jan 2025 – Present
● Develop tools to optimize carbon-free energy asset management, balancing profitability with environmental stewardship for one of the world’s largest clean energy portfolios. ● Collaborate with cross-functional teams to align with corporate and regulatory goals (PPA, EAC) ● Built a live monitor system that reduces financial audit time by 6 months per year.

Software Development Engineer, Amazon Music – Free & Prime Customers Jan 2021 – Dec 2024
● Developed UX and playback improvements for 30+ million Free and Prime mobile customers ● Led cross-team advocacy efforts to resolve accessibility gaps, resulting in improved playback resilience by 30% and a seamless playback experience for users with diverse needs.

Software Engineer, Stilt
Mar 2020 – Aug 2020
● Automated unsecured loan document creation for thousands of applications of first-generation immigrants, complying with state loan regulations and increasing approval rates. ● Integrated real-time fraud detection (i.e. two-factor authentication), reducing unauthorized access and safeguarding user accounts.

Education
Simon Fraser University - B.A.S. Mechatronics Systems Engineering Surrey British Columbia, Canada
Sept 2014 – Aug 2018

44 of 114

CITY OF SAN MATEO

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Name: William Mader
Email:

Primary
Phone:

Address: San Mateto
San Mateo resident
since: February 2021 I am a registered voter in City of San Mateo: Yes Board or Commission interested in serving on (check all that apply):

Did you attend a meeting for this Board or
Commission?: Yes

QUALIFICATIONS
My qualifications for serving on this board/commission are as follows: I currently work for a multifamily real estate development company and am aware of how careful and far-sighted urban planning can enhance the qualify of life for the community, both in the current moment and for future decades. The value of a general plan will be greatly enhanced if it is commercially viable, and my business experience in the real estate industry will ensure this is the case.

I want to serve on this board/commission because: I am passionate about managing the City's future growth in a way that thoughtfully provides for the needs of the community.

Please list any other background information (business, education, community involvement) which might be useful in considering your appointment and attach a resume: I grew up in Wisconsin and majored in economics and Spanish. I have been a California resident since August 2013 and a San Mateo resident since February 2021. I am a Chartered Financial Analyst and am an active member of the CFA Society San Francisco.

Graduate of:

45 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

Certified/Agreed
2025-05-02
Submitted By Date

46 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
In the past few decades, California has experienced significant population growth due to its strong employment base and high qualify of life. Development has not necessarily kept pace, in part due to local restrictions, which has resulted in what many in the area consider to be a housing crisis driven by very high rents/home prices. As a result of the supply/demand imbalance, the State of California has enacted legislation mandating the creation of housing. In response, cities across the state, including San Mateo, have put plans in place to meet the state requirements while also ensuring any development that takes place is supported by and meets the needs of the local community.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
San Mateo is a desirable place to live for many reasons and as such has high home prices and rents. The creation of additional housing is essential to ensure that our community remains accessible to all residents, but must be done in a way that doesn't alter the qualify of life that makes the city so attractive. Development is frequently controversial, but there are many underutilized areas within the city that can be repurposed in a more productive way to meet the state's housing goals without adversely impacting existing residents. I work for a development company yet am also a homeowner, so would bring a balance approach to ensure development is done in a thoughtful way.

47 of 114

WILLIAM R. MADER, CFA

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Carmel Partners, San Francisco, CA
Director, Capital Finance Sep 2018 – present
• Secure debt financing for ground-up multifamily construction projects and value-add acquisitions, including the preparation of marketing materials, soliciting of term sheets, lender selection and loan document negotiation. • Arrange syndicates/participations for large transactions (typically deals over $70MM). • Manage balance sheet and debt maturities through the refinancing of existing in-place debt. • Source, develop and maintain relationships with commercial banks, life insurance companies and debt funds to ensure ongoing access to capital.
• Monitor asset performance to ensure covenant compliance, amend loans as required by the needs of the business and resolve issues that arise during the monthly loan draw process.

Swift Real Estate Partners, San Francisco, CA
Finance Manager Apr 2016 – Aug 2018
• Determined corporate debt policy as Finance Committee member, including approval of financing plan for new acquisitions, all debt refinancing, interest rate hedging and total fund leverage. • Funded capital needs of the business through balanced use of $750 million of debt capacity (including subscription lines and secured & unsecured debt facilities) and $700 million of total investor equity commitments. • Refined fund promote model to better link proposed changes to property level business plans with investor returns. • Lead system migration of data and underwriting models from Argus DCF to Argus Enterprise. Received Employee of the Month award for proactive approach and successful data integration. • Streamlined debt compliance reporting for 30 secured loans and four guarantors across nine different lenders.

Starwood Waypoint Residential Trust, Oakland, CA
Capital Markets Manager Apr 2014 – Apr 2016
• Managed three revolving, one securitized and two convertible debt facilities totaling over $2.5 billion, including negotiation of loan agreements, marketing & closing select transactions, ongoing covenant compliance, 30 funding requests for $1.2 billion and monthly/quarterly investor reporting. • Established relationships with syndicate of five lenders; this solid partnership was a key factor in the lenders’ decision to waive minimum release price provisions and amend operating covenant requirements, ultimately resulting in substantial increased cash flow for the company. • Analyzed trends and developments in the capital markets. Key accomplishments include: lowering the company’s cost of capital by 20% (saving over $3 million in interest annually); designing derivative strategies to reduce interest rate risk while maximizing free cash flow; and providing capital to fund $30 million monthly acquisition budget. • Created pro-forma and historical cash flow models aggregating over 9,000 single family properties across 12 markets; these models were used by lenders to assess portfolio performance. • Eliminated $75 million repayment risk by leading effort to clear 48 cross attaching liens in Florida; earned Star of the Quarter award recognition from CFO for the successful reduction of this exposure. • Implemented due diligence procedures to electronically organize and store over 40,000 legal documents; oversee team of six associates in their ongoing execution.

Vail Resorts, Keystone, CO
Ski Patrol - Mountain Safety Associate Jan 2013 – Apr 2013

48 of 114

WILLIAM R. MADER, CFA

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE (continued)
Bank of America, Chicago, IL
Note: In Oct. 2007 Bank of America acquired LaSalle Bank; the CDO Group was subsequently divested to US Bank in Jan 2011.

Product and Relationship Manager Jun 2010 – Aug 2011
• Managed six client relationships for eighteen Commercial Real Estate (CRE) CDO transactions totaling over $15 billion in issued notes backed by CMBS and CRE loan collateral. • Negotiated trust agreements, indentures and collateral administration agreements. • Developed a revenue model to project trustee fees and anticipated balance runoff. • Resolved all escalated issues regarding language ambiguities in the underlying deal documents. • Ensured actions of deal parties were in compliance with applicable covenants and constraints. • Partnered with the Senior Leadership Team to develop a performance evaluation system for the CDO Enterprise.

Technology and Process Improvement Manager Jun 2009 – Jun 2010 • Oversaw all aspects of the administration of over thirty Total Return Swap (TRS), Cash Flow CLO, RMBS and Custody portfolios comprising more than $10 billion in assets.
• Performed due diligence on over 300 obligors and thousands of potential trades to ensure credit quality. • Created a capacity model to define and assess group productivity and resource utilization. • Fostered the development and evaluated the performance of eleven financial analysts. • Increased efficiency and profitability through the implementation of a shared services business platform. • Championed technology projects and initiatives as business subject matter expert.

Senior Financial Analyst Sep 2007 – Jun 2009
• Stress tested shadow cash flow and compliance models using proprietary software and Excel. • Collaborated with system developers to automate and develop more efficient workflows.

Financial Analyst Jul 2006 – Sep 2007
• Prepared investor reports determining waterfall and swap payments and calculated mark-to-market and profit/loss on a daily and monthly basis to determine margin posting thresholds.

Wells Fargo, Menominee, MI
Personal Banker Oct 2005 – Apr 2006
• Compiled and analyzed financial data to recommend borrowing strategies and restructuring of debt for private and business clients with up to $2 million in assets.

EDUCATION
CFA Charterholder Charter received Aug 2011; passed Level I, II and III Exams on first attempt

University of Wisconsin – Madison B.A. Economics and Spanish Sep 2001 – May 2005 Cumulative GPA: 3.8/4.0

Complutense University of Madrid Academic Year Abroad Aug 2003 – Jul 2004

SKILLS
MS Excel, Word, PowerPoint, Argus, Salesforce, Compass, SQL, Yardi, CDO Suite, Wall Street Analytics, Bloomberg.

Fluent in Spanish, proficient in German, basic knowledge of Mandarin Chinese

49 of 114

CITY OF SAN MATEO

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Name: Maxwell Schaumkel
Email:

Primary
Phone:

Address: San Mateo
Street City Zip Code
San Mateo resident
since:

December 7th
1981 I am a registered voter in City of San Mateo: Yes Board or Commission interested in serving on (check all that apply):

Did you attend a meeting for this Board or
Commission?: Yes

QUALIFICATIONS
My qualifications for serving on this board/commission are as follows: As a lifelong resident of San Mateo and graduate of San Mateo High School, I bring a deep personal commitment to the growth, livability, and character of our city. I have over 20 years of experience in the construction and infrastructure sectors as a licensed electrician with IBEW Local 617, where I currently serve as Business Agent. My career has given me firsthand knowledge of zoning, permitting, building codes, and the complex realities of residential and commercial development. In addition to my professional experience, I have held multiple leadership roles that require sound judgment, consensus building, and long-term planning—including my service on the Executive Board of IBEW Local 617, the San Mateo County Joint Apprenticeship Training Committee, and the Pension Trust Board. These roles have honed my ability to balance the interests of stakeholders while prioritizing public benefit. My background in youth outreach, financial stewardship, and international volunteer work also reflect a lifelong commitment to public service. I am confident that my practical knowledge of land use, infrastructure, labor, and community priorities will allow me to contribute meaningfully to the Planning Commission's decisions and goals.

I want to serve on this board/commission because: I want to serve on the Planning Commission because I believe San Mateo is at a pivotal moment—we need to grow in ways that are both inclusive and sustainable. As a lifelong resident and union electrician, I’ve seen the challenges our community faces: rising housing costs, increasing displacement, and the urgent need for climate-resilient infrastructure. I want to help guide planning decisions that expand access to affordable housing, protect working families, and ensure smart, transit-oriented development. My experience in the skilled trades has given me a ground-level view of how buildings, zoning, and infrastructure come together—and how good planning can improve lives. I want to contribute that practical knowledge and a strong commitment to equity to help shape a city that reflects our shared values, preserves our character, and builds a better future for the next generation of San Mateo residents.

50 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]
Please list any other background information (business, education, community involvement) which might be useful in considering your appointment and attach a resume: In addition to my career as a licensed and state certified electrician and labor representative, I bring over 20 years of diverse experience across construction, workforce development, financial stewardship, and community service—all of which directly inform the work of the Planning Commission. From 2004 to 2008, I worked in commercial and residential landscape maintenance, gaining firsthand knowledge of property care, zoning compliance, and land use at the neighborhood level. From 2009 to 2012, I served as a youth outreach coordinator and have since continued to serve as a financial clerk for Peninsula First Ward—managing budgets, records, and outreach programs for our local youth in our community. My service background includes two years in Honduras helping rebuild homes and infrastructure in rural areas devastated by Hurricane Mitch. That experience shaped my long- term commitment to public service and equitable development. I currently serve as a Business Agent and former Executive Board Member of IBEW Local 617. I also hold appointments on the San Mateo County Joint Apprenticeship Training Committee, the Pension Trust Board, and serve as a delegate and trustee for the San Mateo County Central Labor Council and the Building and Construction Trades Council. These leadership roles have allowed me to advocate for workers, participate in regional infrastructure planning, and collaborate with public agencies. My education began here in San Mateo, graduating from San Mateo High School in 2000. I am also an Eagle Scout—having earned that rank as a member of Troop 367 here in our city. All of these experiences—combined with my deep roots in San Mateo—give me the insight, dedication, and collaborative spirit needed to serve effectively on the Planning Commission. My resume is attached for your review.

Graduate of:

Certified/Agreed
2025-05-02
Submitted By Date

51 of 114

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
As a union construction worker, business representative of IBEW Local 617, and a trustee with both the San Mateo County Building and Construction Trades Council and the Electrical Joint Apprenticeship Committee, I see firsthand how important the General Plan is. It helps determine what kinds of development are possible and where, and that directly impacts the kinds of jobs and opportunities available to our skilled workforce. In my role, I regularly monitor projects and I've also made public comments during planning commissions and city council meetings throughout the entitlement process to make sure there's a strong connection between responsible development and job opportunities for the local workforce. I see the General Plan not just as a policy document, but as a tool that can support good jobs, sustainable growth, and a high quality of life for San Mateo residents. The General Plan is the guiding document that sets the long-term vision for how the City of San Mateo will grow and develop. It lays out policies and goals related to land use, housing, transportation, environmental protection, and community character. My understanding is that it serves as the foundation for all land use decisions, helping city leaders make choices that are consistent, thoughtful, and in line with the community’s values and priorities.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
Balancing community concerns with the state’s housing requirements is a complex responsibility, especially in a place like San Mateo where people care deeply about their neighborhoods. I believe the key is to approach each proposal with transparency, open-mindedness, and a strong understanding of both the legal aspects and the values of the community. In my professional life, I represent working people and advocate for quality jobs, training, and fair labor standards. While I bring that perspective to the table, I fully understand the importance of remaining impartial as a planning commissioner. If appointed, I would set aside any outside affiliations when reviewing proposals and evaluate each project based on its merits, its compliance with local and state requirements, and the input from the community. Personally, I believe in responsible development—growth that supports housing needs while preserving the quality of life for current residents. My goal would be to make thoughtful decisions that reflect the best interests of the city as a whole, not any one group or outcome. I would always be mindful of my role and uphold the integrity and neutrality the position requires.

52 of 114

Maxwell Schaumkel
Objective
Dedicated San Mateo resident with over two decades of community service, labor leadership, and construction industry experience, seeking to contribute to the Planning Commission of the City of San Mateo. Committed to sustainable development, equitable infrastructure planning, and civic engagement.

Education
San Mateo High School — Diploma
Graduated: 2000
Professional Experience
IBEW Local Union 617 — Electrician
May 2012 – Present
• Over a decade of hands-on experience in residential, commercial, and public infrastructure projects.
• Deep understanding of zoning, safety regulations, permitting, and planning compliance.

Business Agent & Delegate, IBEW Local 617 & San Mateo County Building and Construction Trades Council
Appointed June 2024 – Present
• Represent union membership in regional planning, labor relations, and construction initiatives.
• Active role in negotiating agreements and ensuring regulatory adherence for projects across San Mateo County.

Trustee, Pension Trust – IBEW Local 617
Appointed April 2025 – Present
• Oversight of pension plan governance and fiduciary management.

53 of 114

Trustee, San Mateo County Central Labor Council
Appointed March 2025 – Present
Delegate, San Mateo County Central Labor Council
Appointed December 2024 – Present
Executive Board Member – IBEW Local 617
July 2022 – May 2024
• Contributed to union policy, membership affairs, and long-term planning.

Committee Member – Joint Apprenticeship Training Committee, San Mateo County
Appointed January 2023 – Present
• Support workforce development and vocational education aligned with county growth and infrastructure needs.

Financial Clerk – Peninsula First Ward
January 2020 – Present
• Manage financial transactions, budgeting, and record-keeping for a local religious congregation.

Youth Outreach Coordinator – Peninsula First Ward
January 2009 – April 2012
• Led programs for youth engagement, leadership development, and community volunteer work.

Landscape Maintenance Technician – CurbAppeal
October 2004 – November 2008
• Managed commercial and residential landscaping projects, contributing to neighborhood beautification.

Volunteer & Community Service
Missionary & Service Worker – Honduras (Post-Hurricane Mitch) October 2002 – October 2004
• Rebuilt adobe homes and rural infrastructure in areas devastated by Hurricane Mitch.
• Facilitated sustainable development projects in underserved communities.

Eagle Scout – Boy Scouts of America (Troop 367, San Mateo)

54 of 114

• Demonstrated leadership, service, and project planning through completion of Eagle Scout requirements.

Leadership & Affiliations
• Member, IBEW Local 617
• Delegate, San Mateo County Central Labor Council
• Member, San Mateo County Building and Construction Trades Council • Member, Joint Apprenticeship Training Committee
• Eagle Scout, BSA
Skills & Expertise
• Community Planning & Infrastructure
• Union & Labor Representation
• Construction & Electrical Systems
• Fiscal Oversight & Governance
• Public Speaking & Stakeholder Engagement
• Youth & Community Development

55 of 114

1 From: Adam Klafter
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 5:40 PM
To: Clerk
Cc: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Re: Planning Commission appointments
Mayor, Deputy Mayor, honorable members of City Council, I wanted to write a brief letter in support of Adam Nugent’s reappointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission for another term. Over the last several years, Adam contributed to the development of our city’s housing element and design standards, and currently serves as Vice Chair. While there has been a relative lull at the Planning Commission since the latter half of 2024, my expectation is that this will soon change as a significant number of building applications make their way through the planning process. As we begin to see those projects in front of the commission, I believe that Adam’s expertise and tenure on the commission will be an asset to our deliberations and the commission’s ability to respond in a constructive way to community concerns. In my observations prior to my own appointment, and since that time in my direct interactions, I consider Adam to be incisive in his comments, respectful of different points of view and genuine in his commitment to San Mateo.

Finally, touching for a moment on the subject of continuity: if it is the council’s decision not to reappoint Adam to the commission, I would move up in seniority, and if current procedure is maintained may find myself in the position of Chair of the commission without having had the opportunity to serve first as Vice Chair for the normal length of time. I believe that this break in continuity of leadership would not be in the best interest of serving the community.

Respectfully,
-Adam Klafter

56 of 114

1 From: Gene Alston < >
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 11:27 AM
To: Clerk
Cc: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Recommendation for Adam Nugent – City of San Mateo Planning Commission Dear City Council Members,

I wholeheartedly recommend Adam Nugent for re-appointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission.

Adam brings a rare combination of service, leadership, and independent thinking that would greatly benefit the city during a period of critical planning and growth.

A veteran of the United States military, Adam has demonstrated a lifelong commitment to public service and civic duty.

His disciplined approach, principled foundation, and mission-oriented mindset are evident in every aspect of his community involvement.

Adam’s military service reflects a deep commitment to public duty—a value I share as a fellow Veteran—and one that is urgently needed in our civic institutions.

Adam is also a thoughtful and independent voice—willing to ask tough questions, engage diverse perspectives, and prioritize long-term community outcomes over short-term political considerations. He approaches planning decisions with a balanced perspective that respects both individual property rights and the broader needs of San Mateo’s future.

I urge his re-appointment and am confident he will continue to serve the City of San Mateo and all of its community well.

Best,
Gene Alston
Baywood Resident

57 of 114

1 From: Auros Harman < >
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 1:19 PM
To: Clerk
Subject: City Council Special Meeting 2025-05-07 6pm item 1 planning commissioner interviews Dear Council and Staff,

I currently serve as Chair of the Planning Commission for the City of San Bruno. I note this just to provide context for my knowledge of the role; I speak here only on my own behalf, not on behalf of the city or commission.

I write in support of Planning Commissioner Adam Nugent, whom I know from 21 Elements events, and other meetings where people involved in municipal business interact. Mr. Nugent is deeply knowledgeable about land use and transportation, and has consistently shown himself to be kind, public-spirited, and tolerant. He is a role model for commissioners throughout the region, applying the rules set by the state, county, and city fairly, exercising discretion where the law allows, to serve the public interest. I would strongly encourage you to re-appoint him for another term.

Regards,
Auros Harman

58 of 114

59 of 114

From: Mary Beavins >
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 9:53 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Please do not renew Adam Nugent's seat.

Dear City Council,

Please do not renew Adam Nugent's seat. We San Mateans need someone we can trust who represents the best interests of all of us and who has the ethics that we share of honesty and above-board behavior. Adam Nugent is not that person.

Please do not renew Adam Nugent's seat.

Mary Beavins

60 of 114

1 From: Jean Dail
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 12:34 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Do NOT reappoint “no ethics” Adam Nugent to our Planning Commision!!! Dear City Counsel Members:

Please take the action that should have been taken long before now. Do NOT reappoint Adam Nugent to our Planning Commission. This is not the type of person we should have making recommendations for our city. Hasn’t all the negative and unethical behavior of Nugent warranted his removal from our city politics???

Please do not let him continue to be part of the City of San Mateo’s future.

Sincerely, Jean Dail
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad

61 of 114

1 From: Daniel Schonberg < >
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 6:23 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo); Clerk
Subject: Planning Commission Vacancies
I am a San Mateo resident living on E 5th Ave. I am writing to express my support for John Lovell, Adam Nugent, and Andrew Reback for the planning commission vacancies. Particularly John Lovell would be a fantastic contributor to our city.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Daniel Schonberg

62 of 114

1 From: Doug D'Anna < >
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 9:34 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commission Reappointment
Dear Council,

I am writing to respectfully urge the City Council to DENY the reappointment of Adam Nugent to the San Mateo Planning Commission during the interviews scheduled for May 7, 2025.

As a concerned resident, I believe that public trust and ethical conduct are essential for effective governance. Who can forget the campaign sign fiasco in October 2022? Seriously, it was all over the papers and the news—an act caught on camera and reported by KCBS Radio.

Denying Mr. Nugent’s reappointment would demonstrate a
dedication to restoring trust and ensuring that commissioners uphold the highest standards of integrity.

Thank you for considering this request and for your service to our community.

Sincerely,

Doug D’Anna

63 of 114

1 From: Ronnie Eaton < >
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 10:51 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: New voices needed
Honorable Members of the City Council:

We are contacting you to request that Adam Lorraine's tenure on the Planning Commission not be extended.

We need to have more rotation of planning commission members and new points of view on the commission as San Mateo undergoes more intense development as the result of the passage of Measure T.

Please take an indepth look at the new applicants for this important commission.

Thank you,

Bruce and Ronnie Eaton
Sunnybrae residents

64 of 114

I wholeheartedly recommend Adam Nugent for re-appointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission.

Adam brings a rare combination of service, leadership, and independent thinking that would greatly benefit the city during a period of critical planning and growth.

A veteran of the United States military, Adam has demonstrated a lifelong commitment to public service and civic duty.

His disciplined approach, principled foundation, and mission-oriented mindset are evident in every aspect of his community involvement.

Adam’s military service reflects a deep commitment to public duty—a value I share as a fellow Veteran—and one that is urgently needed in our civic institutions.

I urge his re-appointment and am confident he will continue to serve the City of San Mateo and all of its community well.

Best,
Gene Alston
Baywood Resident

65 of 114

1 From: Mike Germano
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 11:42 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: San Mateo Planning Commissioner - Concerns
To my City Council members,

I am a long time resident of San Mateo and I strongly oppose the continuance of Adam Nugent on our city's planning commission.

He has proven unprofessional and unworthy of our trust in his actions. He does not represent the values and professionalism we expect in our city officials and the residents of San Mateo deserve.

Please do not allow Adam Nugent to remain on our city's Planning Commission.

Thank you,

Mike Germano

66 of 114

1 From: ROB GIBSON
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 12:54 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planing Commission
Dear San Mateo City Council,

Tonight you are tasked with renewing the council seat of councilman Adam Nugent. If my memory is correct Mr. Nugent was caught illegally removing the campaign yard signs of candidates he did not approve of. This act is completely illegal and blatantly undemocratic.

This kind of activity should not be rewarded by his seat being renewed.

There are other qualified candidates that should be put at the top of the list long before Mr. Nugent is even considered.

Thank You,
Rob Gibson

67 of 114

1 From:

Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 10:40 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: FW:Julie-- TODAY! PLEASE WRITE COUNCIL: [email protected] Hi—While I wait for your call back to see how you’re doing…..

Here’s my brief response—they have 12 letters supporting him. They need a number against him—this guy is vicious!
Earlier Council supporter was a big Union guy, and not much public outrage over the election sign stealing. The back stabbing General Plan presentation end-run when he didn’t get his way was outrageous! Use my words or reopen you own.

[email protected]

Please do not reappoint Adam Newsom to the Planning Commission. His ongoing actions have created controversy and distrust, and he has lost the respect of San Mateo residents, staff and general City government. San Mateo has many challenges. Effective m anagement requires coordination and trust to work
successfully. Mr. Newsom has lost respect and credibility and can not longer effectively hold the seat.

Please select someone else from the other qualified candidates.

Respectfully, Carol Gillett

From Lisa Tanner—downtown citizen advocate. From: Lisa Taner Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 8:30 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:

Subject: Fwd: TODAY! PLEASE WRITE COUNCIL

Hello! I am reaching out last minute to friends to ask that as soon as you receive this email please send an email into the city council to ask them not to allow planning commissioner Adam Nugent to remain in his seat.

That seat is up for Renewal and tonight will be the decision but he's got about 12 letters supporting him from his pro development cronies.

This is the same guy who removed our current mayors campaign signs illegally and nothing was done about it because he had friends on the council at that time. This is the same guy who tried to get the state to disapprove what our city submitted for housing in order to allow developers free reign.

If you want to read more below, here is a post I made the other day but please just send in your email asking that Council choose from the many other applicants rather than renew Adam's seat when he has already broken down public trust.

[email protected]
Thank you!

68 of 114

2 -----

SHAKE IT UP – TAKE YOUR DIRTY DEEDS ELSEWHERE

Bad people stay in power when other bad people help them to do so. LET'S HOPE THIS WEEK SHAKES THINGS UP for San Mateo.

On May 7th, Mayor Rob Newsom joins councilmembers Cwirko-Godycki, Fernandez and Loraine to interview prospects for the Planning Commission. One of them is "No Ethics" Nugent, a currently serving Planning Commissioner, reinterviewing to stay in his seat. Does he deserve it? NOPE.

I bring you back to the recent history of 2022, when City Hall was filled with ne'er-do-wells who did what they wished, including Planning Commissioner Adam Nugent. He relied on 3 friends on the Council who consistently chose to look the other way.

In November of 2022, then Councilmember Eric Rodriguez joined Diane Papan in asking for an investigation of Nugent after the second time he went rogue that year:
"Public confidence in San Mateo's Planning Commission is falling fast and might be at an all-time low."

So, what did Nugent do?

It began in April, 2022. As an appointed Planning Commissioner, many were aghast to learn that Nugent submitted a 72-page PowerPoint to the State of California to undermine the City of San Mateo. He did this working from his City email, trampling all over City staff who'd spent years working to comply with the State's housing mandate. Nugent's dismantling handiwork, completely out of line with his duties, was meant to effectively convince the State to place San Mateo in the crosshairs of unchecked development.

So, what happened to Commissioner Nugent for this audacious act? Nothing. Maybe the City was busy trying to convince the State that Nugent's PowerPoint shouldn't override their own, but more likely it was due to his Council cronies wanting Nugent to remain in his seat. No slap on the wrist, no removal, no nothing. (FYI: It takes 4 Council votes to remove a commissioner.)

Parents know when bad behavior goes unpunished, a child will feel emboldened and repeat the pattern.

Fast forward to October 2022 when Nugent's next move was referred to the District Attorney.*

Let's talk about campaign tampering. Political campaign signs are a form of speech protected under the First Amendment - but that didn't matter to Nugent. He removed campaign signs. More specifically he removed only Rob Newsom's signs, a council candidate he did not support - and left others alone. Trouble was, it was caught on camera. It was only when radio station KCBS called Nugent that he admitted what he had done - but
because he thought the signs were placed improperly, he said. Which makes zero sense as to why he would not take the adjacent signs. I guess he hoped we'd all buy his story.

69 of 114

3 the matter and the Chief reported it had "resulted in sufficient criminal evidence that the case has been forwarded to the DA."

A normally good-natured Rob Newsom (now our Mayor) responded:
"This (sign stealing) story has been airing all day today on KCBS Radio. As a Personnel Board Commissioner, I am saddened that a fellow City Commissioner (Adam Nugent) would take it upon himself to remove/steal my signs in broad daylight- with his child in-tow. I had hoped that he would just come forward and apologize. He has not."

So, what do we want? Ethics? Social media screams for it all the time. Ethics San Mateo, a citizen group, was formed in October 2022 due to much of this nonsense, but not surprisingly got no traction with our then- Council.

But here is the GOOD news. Our current Council is slated to review recommendations by Ethics San Mateo to strengthen and support ethical conduct in City Hall - INCLUDING COMMISSIONERS. But let's go one better - Let's CLEAN HOUSE.

People like Adam Nugent have been allowed to sit in important seats and make decisions for us all when it's very clear HIS decision-
making is questionable at best. While time may have dulled the bite of Nugent's brazen actions and his cronies have since fallen mostly by the wayside, Councilmember Rodriguez' words about public confidence should still be ringing loudly.

I say this: ADAM NUGENT, YOUR TERM IS UP.

Now let's hope the Council says the same.
---------
*Good-natured Newsom did not press charges and therefore the DA did not pursue the case against Nugent.

Parents know when bad behavior goes unpunished, a child will feel emboldened and repeat the pattern.

Fast forward to October 2022 when Nugent's next move was referred to the District Attorney.*

70 of 114

4 caught on camera. It was only when radio station KCBS called Nugent that he admitted what he had done - but because he thought the signs were placed improperly, he said. Which makes zero sense as to why he would not take the adjacent signs. I guess he hoped we'd all buy his story.

Nugent did a little dance, as did his Council supporters when Councilmembers Papan and Rodriguez urged there be a fact-finding investigation to satisfy the public outcry. The San Mateo Police Department looked into the matter and the Chief reported it had "resulted in sufficient criminal evidence that the case has been forwarded to the DA."

I say this: ADAM NUGENT, YOUR TERM IS UP.

71 of 114

1 From:

Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 12:35 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Pleae do NOT reappoint Adam Nugent
Mayor and Council,

Tonight you will interview for a potential vacancy on the Planning Commission. While I know that, historically, there is a strong tendancy to reappoint an incumbent, in the case of Adam Nugent this would be a mistake. His past actions, especially in 2022, demonstrate that he is not someone in whom San Mateans can place their trust. You should not, either.

Adam's contact with the state while we were developing our Housing Element, completely undercutting the extensive work done by our city staff, was unconscionable. And don't get me started
on his pathetic "excuses" as to why he stole campaign signs supporting our current mayor.

I proudly served on the Planning Commission from 1975-1981 and again from 1993-2001. I served with people who strongly espoused a variety of positions and approaches to our city's future. I understand what legitimate disagreements look like. That is not w hat we are talking about here. I also
understand when someone does not measure up to what the city's residents and leaders should expect from its commissioners.

Adam Nugent does not measure up. Please do not re-appoint him.

Karen Herrel
resident since 1963

72 of 114

73 of 114

From: Jon New
To: Clerk; City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: City Council, I really hope you consider keeping Adam Nugent on the Planning Commission. Having experience on both the General Plan Subcommittee and Commission is incredibly useful.

Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 10:10:38 PM
Dear City Council,
I’m writing to express my strong support for Adam Nugent’s reappointment to the Planning Commission.

Adam has already served the city with dedication in this role and on the General Plan Subcommittee, contributing meaningfully to complex and often contentious discussions. He listens carefully, considers a wide range of perspectives, and offers well-reasoned responses that elevate the conversation, even on the occasions where I disagree . His experience is an asset, and his thoughtful approach brings value to the commission’s work.

Continuity and experience matter, particularly in planning issues that impact the long-term future of our community. I believe Adam’s continued presence on the commission would serve the city well.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Jonathan New

74 of 114

1 From: Chuck Kabala < >
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 9:16 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commissioner Seat
Dear City Council Members, As a long time San Mateo resident I've seen our city change over the years, and not always for the better. I believe we could get a "better" planning commissioner rather than allowing Adam Nugent to continue in this role. He has lost the trust of many residents with his shenanigans and I respectfully ask you to choose from the other qualified applicants.

Sincerely,

Beth Kabala

75 of 114

1 From:

Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 12:41 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Adam Nugent
Please do not appoint Adam Nugent to the Planning Commission. He has lost credibility and trust and should no longer hold this hold this seat on the Council.

Carol P. Kalb

76 of 114

1 From: Adam Klafter < >
Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 5:40 PM
To: Clerk
Cc: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Re: Planning Commission appointments
Mayor, Deputy Mayor, honorable members of City Council, I wanted to write a brief letter in support of Adam Nugent’s reappointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission for another term. Over the last several years, Adam contributed to the development of our city’s housing element and design standards, and currently serves as Vice Chair. While there has been a relative lull at the Planning Commission since the latter half of 2024, my expectation is that this will soon change as a significant number of building applications make their way through the planning process. As we begin to see those projects in front of the commission, I believe that Adam’s expertise and tenure on the commission will be an asset to our deliberations and the commission’s ability to respond in a constructive way to community concerns. In my observations prior to my own appointment, and since that time in my direct interactions, I consider Adam to be incisive in his comments, respectful of different points of view and genuine in his commitment to San Mateo.

Respectfully,
-Adam Klafter

77 of 114

1 From: Deborah Kohn < >
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 11:26 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commissioner Adam Nugent
City Council Members:

As a San Mateo resident for over 30 years, I am writing to ask you to PLEASE NOT renew Planning Commissioner Adam Nugent's seat on the Planning Commission and to choose from the many other very qualified applicants!

Sincerely,

Deborah Kohn

78 of 114

1 From: Yi-ting Lin >
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 10:27 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Please do NOT renew Adam Nugent for planning commissioner Dear San Mateo City Council,

I am sending this email to advocate NOT to renew Adam Nugent as our planning commissioner. He is unethical in many incidents that were being reported and she should not serve for San Mateo.

thanks,
17 years San Mateo resident
Yi-ting

79 of 114

1 From: Julia
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 11:22 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Adam Nugent conflict of interest
Dear Councilmembers,

We are in dire need of new people on the Planning Commission.

An appointee such as Adam Nugent is not acceptable! A commissioner should NEVER be part of a strong special interest group like California Yimby, the labor union, etc. This is a serious conflict of interest that has gone on for way too long.

Beyond the above, Mr. Nugent has shown his poor ethics and integrity repeatedly. To the dismay of many in the community, his then-cronies on the Council chose to do absolutely nothing. Diane Papan and Eric Rodriquez were the only ones who fought for investigations and that was the absolute right thing to do.

It's time to do the right thing NOW. Purge our important commissions of special interest people; purge the Planning Commission of a commissioner who already got his 'second chance' and still proved to be unfit for his seat. There are many other candidates that are better suited to the position who are ethical and have integrity, and who do not have conflicts of interests.

Our city deserves all new commissioners that that will serve with transparency, ethics, and integrity.

Sincerely,
Julia Lovotti

80 of 114

1 From: Margaret Williams
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 11:03 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo); Clerk
Cc: Zachary Dahl
Subject: Comments for Planning Commissioner Interviews
Dear Appointment Subcommittee and City Council Members,

I’m writing to provide my comments in advance of the Planning Commissioner Interviews today. I would like to express my support for Adam Nugent, current Planning Commissioner, and to recommend that you reappoint him as a Planning Commissioner for a second term. Adam has a breadth of knowledge about design, architecture, landscape design, plants and horticulture, housing, aƯordable housing, and the processes that go into development of a project. Adam is a Landscape Architect, and he brings that knowledge to land use planning.

I’ve
seen from working with Adam on the Planning Commission are that he sees the big picture AND he sees the details. He comes to each meeting well prepared and informed about the project and I often learn something during the course of his comments on a project. Adam is an objective and fair- minded person, and he thoughtfully
considers how things aƯect the Applicant and any speakers from the public that are opposed to a project.

I wholeheartedly recommend you appoint Adam Nugent to Planning Commissioner for a second term.

Thank you,

Margaret Williams
Planning Commissioner, City of San Mateo

81 of 114

1 From: Nathan Chan < >
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 9:15 AM
To: Clerk
Subject: Comment in support of Commissioner Nugent's Reappointment Dear Appointment Subcommittee,

Though I am a member of the Millbrae Planning Commission, I want to emphasize that I only offer these comments on my own behalf.

I would urge you to consider reappointing Adam Nugent to the San Mateo Planning Commission. I have known Adam for almost 5 years, through multiple community-based organizations such as Sierra Club.

Adam has consistently demonstrated a commitment to community service, knowledge of the issues, and an ability to get things done.

When I asked other San Mateo County Planning Commissioners how to think about articulated facades in residential design standards, Adam referred me to San Mateo's multi-family design standards, specifically the Flat Plane Variation. To me, this demonstrates that he can work together with the other Commissioners to create a menu of policy alternatives that will support the development of well- designed and abundant multi-family housing. We need leaders like Adam in our community.

Nathan Chan

82 of 114

1 From: Rich Neve
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 12:10 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning commissioner renewal
Dear City Council Members,

First, thank you for your service. A balanced and thoughƞul council is important for our city to grow and evolve in an ever moving poliƟcal and social landscape.

It is my understanding that the council will soon be considering renewal of Adam Nugent’s posiƟon as commissioner on the city’s planning commission.

I would respecƞully urge the members of our council to consider other candidates for this role. I think there are enough ethical quesƟons around Mr. Nugent’s acƟons that allowing him to remain on the commission is an endorsement of poor judgement and unethical behavior. We need to be beƩer. We need new blood and new ideas.

Best regards
Rich Neve

83 of 114

84 of 114

1 From: Christie Ricci
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 10:26 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: No on Nugent!
Dear SM City Council Members,

I am writing to implore you to NOT renew Adam Nugent's seat. As a 29 year resident of San Mateo, I am disappointed to see the council look the other way when it comes to Nugent 's ethics. He sets a bad example, and is a poor representative of San Mateo's high standards!

Do the RIGHT THING and do NOT RENEW his seat. To do otherwise, makes the council complicit.

Thank you,
Christie Ricci

85 of 114

From: Dave Santos < >
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 3:03 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commissioner Selection
Dear Council Members:

I am writing to request that you do not consider reappointing Adam Nugent as Planning Commissioner.

My concerns about this reappointment center on his pro development advocacy as well as election misbehavior.

Mr. Nugent’s Power Point to the State of California undermining the City of San Mateo initially comes to mind. The second area of concern is campaign tampering and removal of signage.

It is my understanding that City Council is reviewing recommendations by Ethics San Mateo to strengthen and support ethical conduct in City Hall. It is time to hold people accountable and not select Mr. Nugent for Planning Commissioner based on his prior behavior and actions.

You have an opportunity to reestablish public confidence in city government by selecting another candidate that is qualified and does not have a hidden agenda and as much negative baggage.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Sincerely,

Dave Santos

86 of 114

1 From: Seema Patel < >
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 12:02 AM
To: Clerk
Cc: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Reappointing Adam Nugent
Hello City Council,

Although I currently serve on the San Mateo Planning Commission, I am writing on my own behalf as a resident.

I wanted to express my support for Adam Nugent's reappointment to the Planning Commission. Adam's lifelong commitment to public service is evident in the dedication and work ethic he brings to the Planning Commission. He takes the position very seriously and invests a great deal of time into thoroughly preparing for every agenda item. (He proactively familiarizes himself with local and state regulations and takes advantage of resources like handbooks and trainings to further his knowledge.) His deep research is evident in the solutions he brings to the dais and the information he shares with staff, commissioners and the public.

Adam is a thoughtful listener who navigates complex issues and detailed conversations with nuance and ease. He is willing to ask tough questions and prioritize long-term outcomes with the greatest benefit to the community over short-term or popular fixes. He routinely advocates for the right decision, not the easy one.

There is no other person who tries harder to find and implement the best solutions for San Mateo. (As an example, he took Santa Barbara's Objective Design Standards - an industry benchmark - and created a detailed guide demonstrating how they could be adapted for San Mateo. That effort became the impetus for San Mateo's Downtown Plan Area Objective Design Standards.) His guidance, ideas and suggestions have immeasurably benefitted both the General Plan Subcommittee and the Planning Commission.

The time horizon of projects, plans and policies that are brought before the Planning Commission often spans years. With two vacancies at present, the commission would greatly benefit from the continuity of Adam's service.

Thank you for your consideration!

Regards,
Seema Patel

87 of 114

1 From: Andrew Sevillia
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 8:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Please Do Not Reappoint Adam Nugent to the San Mateo Planning Commission Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the reappointment of Adam Nugent to the San Mateo Planning Commission.

While Mr. Nugent may have vocal support from pro-development allies, that should not outweigh his history of troubling behavior and questionable judgment—particularly in a role that demands integrity, impartiality, and respect for our city processes.

In 2022, Mr. Nugent was involved in an incident where he removed campaign signs for our now-mayor from public property. He claimed the signs were placed in the public right-of-way and that he was trying to “protect” the candidate from potential penalties. This justification does not excuse his unilateral and unauthorized actions. The matter was serious enough to warrant a police investigation, and a report was submitted to the San Mateo County District Attorney's Office for review. Yet, despite this, no accountability followed—likely due to Mr. Nugent’s connections with then-Council allies. This raises serious concerns about fairness and transparency.

Further, as a member of the General Plan Subcommittee, Mr. Nugent actively sought to have the state reject the city’s Housing Element submission. This move would have stripped San Mateo of local control and invited overreach by developers—benefiting private interests at the expense of thoughtful, community-driven planning.

The role of a Planning Commissioner is to balance growth with the needs and values of residents—not to tip the scales toward outside interests or act as a political operative. San Mateo deserves commissioners who uphold ethical standards and who serve the public, not just a narrow constituency.

For these reasons, I respectfully urge you to vote no on Adam Nugent’s reappointment.

Sincerely,

Andrew Sevillia

Regards,

Andrew Sevillia

88 of 114

1 From: Karen S
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 9:15 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commission seat - request
Dear City Council,

I respectfully ask you not to renew Adam Nugent's term and to place one of the other candidates as Commissioner. I was greatly disheartened by his sign removal actions as well as his acting against City interests when interfacing with the State. He is not an individual who behaves with the integrity the position requires and should not be placed in a role with the ability to continue his untoward actions. A Commissioner must represent/liaise properly and must be above reproach.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Karen Sid

89 of 114

1 From: Kathy Spiteri
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 11:41 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Nugent
Please do not renew Nugent for his seat. There are other applicants that should have a chance.

90 of 114

1 From: Lisa Taner
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 10:44 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Cc: Clerk
Subject: Planning Commission Needs New Faces, Not Special Interests Dear Councilmembers,

When the White House has a new administration, they make sweeping changes in the folks who serve them. It's now time for new faces on the Planning Commission.

One reason for my faith in local government to be at an all time low is appointees like Adam Nugent.

Never should a commissioner be part of a strong special interest group like California Yimby, the labor union, etc. It is a serious conflict of interest.

As if that isn't enough, Nugent has shown his poor ethics and integrity again and again. Sadly, his then- cronies on the Council chose to do nothing. Diane Papan and Eric Rodriquez were the only ones who fought for investigations and that was the right thing to do.

It's again time to do the right thing. Purge our important commissions of special interest people. Purge the Planning Commission of a commissioner who already got his 'second chance' and still proved to be unfit for his seat. You have many other good choices.

I hope to have my faith and the faith of much of our citizenry renewed by your decisions for all new commissioners.

Thank you.

Lisa Taner

91 of 114

1 From:

Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 2:48 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo); Alex Khojikian; Clerk
Subject: Strong Opposition to the Reappointment of Adam Nugent to the San Mateo City Planning Commission
Dear Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers, City Manager, and City Clerk:

I write to express my strong opposition to the reappointment of Adam Nugent to the San Mateo City Planning Commission.

Planning Commissioners hold positions of public trust. They are expected to uphold the highest standards of ethical conduct and maintain public conﬁdence through transparency, impartiality, and integrity. Unfortunately, Mr. Nugent’s past actions have undermined that trust and demonstrated a concerning pattern of behavior unbecoming of an appointed city oƯicial.

Mr. Nugent was caught removing campaign signs belonging to a city council candidate running against his preferred choice. He provided no explanation despite multiple inquiries. It wasn’t until the story ran publicly that he issued a statement — not to apologize, but to justify his conduct with excuses that many residents found implausible. His delayed and defensive response only intensiﬁed public concern.

Further, his explanation — invoking his role as a neighborhood association president or a licensed landscape architect — does not excuse the clear appearance of election interference. Even if the signs had been improperly placed, it was not his responsibility to remove them, particularly during an active campaign season in which neutrality should be paramount.

This incident is not isolated. Residents have previously expressed alarm over dismissive and accusatory rhetoric from commissioners during public meetings. Accusations of racism directed at constituents, ﬂippant remarks, and general disrespect have no place in civic discourse — especially from those charged with guiding the future development of our community.

We need commissioners who foster unity and respect among residents — not those who stoke division or wield their inﬂuence inappropriately.

The City’s Planning Commission must be composed of individuals who are beyond reproach and who understand the gravity of the role they serve. Reappointing Adam Nugent sends the wrong message to the community — that personal conduct and public trust are secondary to political alignment.

San Mateo deserves better. I urge you to uphold the integrity of our civic institutions and vote against Mr. Nugent’s reappointment.

Sincerely,
Taso Zografos
Resident, San Mateo

92 of 114

1 From: Bob Wackerman
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 1:03 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Reject Adam Nugent
Dear San Mateo city council,
At tonight's council meeting you will be discussing renewing douchbag planning commissioner Adam Nugent's seat. Please vote no and allow any of the other candidates to succeed him.

The citizens of San Mateo don't need an unemployed landcape architect and self described activist against slower growth in our city government.

Regards,
Bob Wackerman

93 of 114

1 From: Jeffrey
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 12:10 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Adam Nugent
Adam Nugent has repeatedly shown he is ethically unqualiﬁed to serve on the Planning Commission. Stealing candidates elecƟon signs and acƟvely working against the city to not approve its housing plan is proof.

Reject Adam Nugent for the Planning Commission.

Jeﬀ Wang
30+ year San Mateo Redident

Sent from my iPhone

94 of 114

1 From: Gary Weber < >
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 3:11 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Adam Nugent
Please do not allow Adam Nugent to be reappointed to the Planning commission! For too long, the city has been run by big developers who could care less what the citizens of the city want! They don’t even live in our city, most probably! Enough is enough with deception and ignoring the will of the people!

Nancy Weber

95 of 114

1 From: Michael < >
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 10:16 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Cc: Clerk; Alex Khojikian
Subject: Planning Commissioner Interviews
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers -

As you approach the upcoming Planning Commissioner interviews, I'm writing to encourage you to expressly weed out activist applicants who can’t put aside their biases in favor of what the city as a whole wants/needs. You have all seen the damage activist insiders have done to San Mateo, reputationally, trust, and otherwise creating division within the city. To them the ends justifies the means (ie stealing signs or writing the HCD directly to tank our housing element), and if you’re not with them ideologically, you’re dismissed as just wrong and/or racist, and/or too old to matter, etc.

It's hard enough to balance the influence of special interests externally without having those same forces working against residents and council/staff internally as well. We need reasonable, ethical people who aren’t in cahoots with developers and special interests, or caught up in extreme movements, and who will set their personal leanings aside in favor of what’s best for the entire community, not just their supporters.

Please get applicants on the record as to their involvement in activist orgs, and how they would balance that, or distance themselves from those in these roles, and make a commitment to enforcing an ethics code that will hold them accountable for their actions, up to and including removal from their role.

This should not be a ballot-type consideration, ie, where the person who gets the most letters "wins".

This is about doing the right thing and governing properly. Many of you ran and received broad support for fighting against the corruption and chaos sown by prior activist councilmembers. This is one of you big opportunities to right those wrongs and restore trust and confidence in the city of San Mateo from its residents.

Thank you for listening - Michael Weinhauer

96 of 114

1 From: Connie Weiss
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 12:56 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commission Candidate Adam Nugent
Hello Mayor Newsom and Councilmembers,

When the two newest council members were seated in December, the feeling of relief and hope was evident in the room. It was if a cloud had been lifted, and we could move forward with the establishment of good ethical behavior that we had not seen in several prior Councils.

With Adam Nugent’s application to be reappointed to the Planning Commission, standards of ethical behavior will once again will be in danger.

Adam has shown his inability for ethical behavior in not one, but two, concrete instances during his first tenure on the Commission. I hope you haven’t forgotten them: the first was stealing candidate Rob Newsom‘s campaign signs, and the second was an audacious 70+ PowerPoint sent to the state undermining the work and agreement of city staff and Council on San Mateo’s housing plan. Because
we have had a history of unethical behavior on previous City Councils, Adam was never held accountable for these two extremely serious acts. You, as leaders in the City, have the perfect opportunity to say, No More!

The Planning Commission has been under siege for several years with Commissioners who have no respect for residents or the health of this city. What they do have is a personal agenda that ignores resident concerns and has deeply hurt the city. We we see this in play with several blocks of empty lots, empty buildings, and new buildings which do not fit in with the architecture that has made this city such a beautiful place to live. Adam has been a key participant in all of this.

I hope you will agree that San Mateo deserves better and will look for Commissioners that exhibit high ethical standards and do not carry a personal agenda that will undermine the will of San Mateo’s residents and leadership.

Thank you,

Connie Weiss
San Mateo resident

97 of 114

1 From: Connie Weiss <c >
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 1:04 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commission Candidate Caiti Busch
Hello Mayor Newsom and Councilmembers,

Please do not consider Caiti Busch for a Planning Commissioner seat. We have a unique opportunity to ensure newly appointed Commissioners carry no personal agendas or biases. Ms. Busch is a very active housing advocate that seems closely aligned with organizations that ignore a City’s real needs in housing, and work closely with developers to simply overbuild and undermine the quality of our City’s character and needs.

She is also closely associated with Stonewall Democrats; she is the organization’s Co- Chair. Unfortunately, this organization seems to be influenced by Commissioner Seema Patel as Ms. Patel lied to them, making a personal comment against me, saying I was homophobic. Stonewall Democrats never reached out to me for any comment, but repeated the lie on their Facebook page. Clearly Ms. Busch should have culpability in allowing the actions of an organization of which she is in the leadership. It is outrageous that a sitting member of the San Mateo Personnel Board thinks it’s OK to defame a resident, and it concerns me deeply if Ms. Busch is associated at all with Ms. Patel.

With the number of very well qualified candidates, it’s better not to take a risk on Ms. Busch and instead seat someone who we know with certainty will respect San Mateo residents and the character
and beauty of this city.

Thank you,

Connie Weiss
San Mateo resident

98 of 114

1 From: Bill Williams < >
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 11:52 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Adam Nugent
City Council:

Please do not continue Adam Nugent's presence on the Planning Commission.

He sabotaged the city's Housing Plan submission to the State of California.

We now have a development oriented General Plan causing displacement of residents. x Bill Williams

99 of 114

1 From: Claudia M.

Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 2:31 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: No Adam Nugent
When I learned about Adam Nugent, I decided to email our City Council. Please do not allow Adam Nugent to remain in his seat. Copied below covers it pretty well:

SHAKE IT UP – TAKE YOUR DIRTY DEEDS ELSEWHERE

Bad people stay in power when other bad people help them to do so. LET'S HOPE THIS WEEK SHAKES THINGS UP for San Mateo.

So, what did Nugent do?

So, what happened to Commissioner Nugent for this audacious act? Nothing. Maybe the City was busy trying to convince the State that Nugent's PowerPoint shouldn't override their own, but more likely it was due to his Council cronies wanting Nugent to remain in his seat. No slap on the wrist, no removal, no nothing.
(FYI: It takes 4 Council votes to remove a commissioner.)

Parents know when bad behavior goes unpunished, a child will feel emboldened and repeat the pattern.

Fast forward to October 2022 when Nugent's next move was referred to the District Attorney.*

100 of 114

2 removed only Rob Newsom's signs, a council candidate he did not support - and left others alone.

Trouble was, it was caught on camera. It was only when radio station KCBS called Nugent that he admitted what he had done - but because he thought the signs were placed improperly, he said. Which makes zero sense as to why he would not take the adjacent signs. I guess he hoped we'd all buy his story.

People like Adam Nugent have been allowed to sit in important seats and make decisions for us all when it's very clear HIS decision-making is questionable at best. While time may have dulled the bite of Nugent's brazen actions and his cronies have since fallen mostly by the wayside, Councilmember Rodriguez' words about public confidence should still be ringing loudly.

I say this: ADAM NUGENT, YOUR TERM IS UP.

Now let's hope the Council says the same.
---------
*Good-natured Newsom did not press charges and therefore the DA did not pursue the case against Nugent.

“I have always loved the beach. The smell of the salty water, the wind in my face, the gentle roar of the waves all combine to create a sense of peace and calm.” -- Anonymous

101 of 114

102 of 114

2  Impartiality, free from bias toward specific agendas (e.g., bike lanes, housing policies), to ensure fair and balanced evaluations.

The selection of Planning Commission members is a pivotal decision that will influence San Mateo’s future. I respectfully urge you to appoint individuals who embody the qualifications outlined above and whose conduct reflects the trust placed in them by our community. By prioritizing integrity, expertise, and impartiality, you can ensure the commission upholds San Mateo’s values and fosters responsible development.

Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration.

Sincerely,

Laurie Hietter

--
Laurie

103 of 114

1 From: Linda Tribuzi
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 3:45 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Feedback
Hello City Council,
I am sending this email to send my support to not allow planning commissioner Adam Nugent to remain in his seat.

Regards,
Linda Tribuzi

104 of 114

From: Thomas Gillett
Sent: Wednesday, May 7, 2025 11:06 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Need new Planning Commissioner
Adam Nugent's actions over the past few years have made him ineffective. The position requires credibility and success in working with community, staff, fellow Commissioners and Council members. Mr Newsom has lost trust and credibility and can no longer hold the seat. It is in the best interest of San Mateo to appoint a new member to the Planning Commission.

Sincerely, Tom Gillett

105 of 114

106 of 114

107 of 114

108 of 114

109 of 114

110 of 114

111 of 114

112 of 114

113 of 114

114 of 114

San Mateo City CouncilMay 7, 2025

San Mateo City Council
May 7, 2025