CITY OF SAN MATEO
City Council Regular Meeting
January 26, 2026
7:00 PM
City Hall Council Chamber
Entrance is on O’Farrell Street
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Adam Loraine
Nicole Fernandez
Danielle Cwirko-Godycki
Lisa Diaz Nash
Robert Newsom Jr.
AGENDA
THIS MEETING CAN BE ATTENDED IN PERSON OR REMOTE BY JOINING ZOOM – SEE CODES BELOW.
PUBLIC COMMENTS WILL BE ACCEPTED BOTH IN PERSON AND REMOTELY.
SEE END OF AGENDA FOR OPTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING.
To join via Zoom – click here: January 26, 2026
To join via telephone: (408) 638-0968
Webinar ID: 868 5410 7919 Passcode: 353335
The City Council meeting will conclude by 11:00 p.m. unless otherwise extended by council vote.
Any unheard items will automatically move forward to the next regular meeting.
CALL TO ORDER
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
AB 2449 Requests and Considerations for Meeting Participation by Teleconference due to Just Cause or Emergency Circumstances
CEREMONIAL
1. Age-Friendly Business Certification — Recognition
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered by the Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion without discussion. If discussion is desired, that item may be removed and considered separately.
2. City Council Meeting Minutes - Approval
Approve the minutes of the special meeting of the City Council held on December 15, 2025.
CEQA: This minutes approval is not a project subject to CEQA, because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).)
3. Ceremonial Street Naming Application Honoring Former Mayor Jerry Hill — Approval Approve the application from Deputy Mayor Fernandez and Council Member Diaz Nash for the ceremonial street naming of O’Farrell Street to honor former Mayor Jerry Hill, consistent with the City’s Ceremonial Street Naming Policy adopted by Resolution No. 109 (2025).
1 of 1110
CEQA: This ceremonial street naming application is not a project subject to CEQA, because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).)
4. 2033 La Salle Drive - Zoning Reclassification, Zoning Code Amendment, and Planning Application for an Early Childhood Education Center — Ordinance Adoption
Adopt an Ordinance to approve a Zoning Reclassification from R1-B to R1-B/Q8, and a Zoning Code Amendment to provide development standards for an educational facility and find it exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption).
CEQA: The Zoning Reclassification and Zoning Map Amendment are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the Common Sense Exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), as the action is administrative in nature and does not authorize or result in any physical change to the environment.
5. Enterprise Resource Planning System Subscription Increase — Approval Approve a subscription growth and expansion increase to the City’s agreement with Workday for an enterprise resource planning system for years five (5) through ten (10) of the existing agreement in the amount of $242,000, for a new total amount of $4,513,883; establish a contingency reserve of $30,000; and authorize the Finance Director to execute the subscription growth acknowledgement in substantially the form presented and issue change orders within the contingency amount.
CEQA: This Council action is not a project subject to CEQA, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the approval of an increase in yearly subscriptions for the City’s ERP system may have a significant effect on the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).)
6. Revisions and Retitle of Crime and Intelligence Analyst Position — Approval Adopt a Resolution to revise the Crime and Intelligence Analyst job specification and retitle as the Real Time Information Center (RTIC) Coordinator position, located in the Police Department.
CEQA: This reclassification is not a project subject to CEQA, because it can be seen with certainty that it will not cause a physical change in the environment. (Public Resources Code Section 21065.)
7. County of San Mateo Compost Broker Program — Memorandum of Understanding Approve a Memorandum of Understanding with San Mateo County to participate in the Senate Bill 1383 Compost Broker Program; authorize the City Manager to execute the Memorandum of Understanding in substantially the form presented; authorize the City Manager to execute future renewals of the MOU to allow continued participation in the Compost Broker Program, subject to City Council approval of associated costs; and authorize payment to San Mateo County in an amount not to exceed $300,000 for calendar year 2026 program costs.
CEQA: Approval of the MOU between the City of San Mateo and the County of San Mateo to establish a SB 1383 compliant procurement program is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because it can be seen with certainty that it will not cause a physical change in the environment. (Public Resources Code Section 21065.)
8. Underground Flow Equalization System Odor Control System Temporary Rental — Change Order Approve an increase to the rental agreement with PureAir Filtration for the Underground Flow Equalization System (UFES) temporary odor control system rental in the amount of $22,000, for a total amount not to exceed $120,000; and authorize the Public Works Director to execute the change order in substantially the form 2 of 1110
presented.
CEQA: This change order is categorically exempt from CEQA as an “existing facility,” because it consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15301.)
9. Transportation Staffing Restructuring – Adoption
Adopt a Resolution to add an additional Engineering Manager position and reallocate an Engineering Technician II position to an Assistant/Associate Transportation Planner position.
CEQA: The creation or reallocation of positions is not a project subject to CEQA, because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).)
10. Wastewater Treatment Plant On-Call Consulting Services — Amendment Approve Amendment No. 4 to the Professional Consultant Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc. for Wastewater Treatment Plant on-call consulting services in the amount of $250,000, for a new not-to-exceed amount of $1,675,000; and authorize the Public Works Director to execute the amendment in substantially the form presented.
CEQA: The proposed action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), since entering on-call professional services agreements is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect significant physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).) In addition, on June 6, 2016, the City Council certified a Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (Final PEIR) (SCH No. 2015032006), which serves as the primary environmental compliance document for implementation of the Clean Water Program. On July 16, 2018, the City approved Addendum 1 to the Final PEIR, and on April 15, 2019, approved Addendum 2. Any resultant capital improvement or operations and maintenancerelated projects resulting from the on-call professional consulting services shall be reviewed on an individual basis or evaluated for consistency with the PEIR and Addenda.
11. Wastewater Treatment Plant Immediate Action Projects Package III — Agreement Award a professional services agreement to HDR Engineering, Inc. to provide Engineering Services During Construction (Phase 3) for Immediate Action Projects Package-III in an amount not to exceed $332,916; establish a contingency reserve of $50,000; and authorize the Public Works Director to execute the agreement in the substantially the form presented and approve any necessary change orders within the approved contingency amount.
CEQA:The proposed action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), since entering on-call professional services agreements is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect significant physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).) In addition, on June 6, 2016, the City Council certified a Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (Final PEIR) (SCH No. 2015032006), which serves as the primary environmental compliance document for implementation of the Clean Water Program. On July 16, 2018, the City approved Addendum 1 to the Final PEIR, and on April 15, 2019, Addendum 2. Any resultant capital improvement or operations and maintenance-related projects resulting from the on-call professional consulting services shall be reviewed on an individual basis or evaluated for consistency with the PEIR and Addenda.
12. On-Call Consultant Services for Transportation Analysis Report Preparation — Amendment 3 of 1110
Approve Amendment No. 2 to the agreements with Kittelson and Associates, Inc., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Steer Davies and Gleave, and Fehr and Peers to extend each agreement term through June 30, 2028, including up to one optional one-year extension, and to update the payment rates; increase Kittelson and Associates agreement by $200,000 for a total not-to-exceed amount of $600,000; and authorize the Public Works Director to execute the amendments in substantially the form presented and execute any future term extensions or amendments that do not change the not-to-exceed amount of the agreements.
CEQA: This item is not a project subject to CEQA, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that extending agreements for professional transportation review services may have a significant effect on the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).)
13. Citywide Tree Planting Services — Bid Rejection
Adopt a Resolution to reject all bids received for the Citywide Tree Planting Services Project.
CEQA: This item is not a project subject to CEQA, because CEQA does not apply to projects that are disapproved. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15270.)
14. Lakeshore Park Batting Cage, Ball Fields, and Concession Building – Lease Agreement Approve a five-year lease agreement with San Mateo National Little League for the batting cage, ball fields, and concessions building at Lakeshore Park, for the period of February 1, 2026, through December 31, 2031, and authorize the Parks and Recreation Director to sign the agreement on behalf of the City in substantially the form presented.
CEQA: This agreement is categorically exempt from CEQA as an “existing facility,” because it consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15301.)
15. Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025 — Approval Accept the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025.
CEQA: This Annual Comprehensive Financial Report is not a project subject to CEQA, because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).)
PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the public wishing to comment on any item not appearing on the agenda may address the City Council at this time. State law prevents Council from taking action on any matter not on the agenda; your comments may be referred to staff for follow up.
Public comment is limited to a total of 15 minutes; however, an opportunity for additional public comment may be provided later in the agenda.
OLD BUSINESS
16. Historic Policy Effort – Update on Draft Historic Policies and Council Direction Receive a presentation on the Draft Citywide Historic Context Statement and Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance Update, receive public comments, and provide staff with direction on how to proceed with updating the draft policy documents and the timeline for scheduling public hearings.
CEQA: This Study Session is not a project subject to CEQA, because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b) 4 of 1110
(5))
PUBLIC HEARING
City Council action on the following public hearing(s) represents a final decision concluding all administrative proceedings. Judicial review may be had only if a petition is filed with the Court not later than the 90th day following the date the decision is made.
Judicial review of environmental determinations may be subject to a time period for litigation as short as 30 days following the date the decision is made.
17. Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance - Zoning Code Amendments — Ordinance Introduction Introduce an Ordinance to amend San Mateo Municipal Code Chapter 27.19, “Accessory Dwelling Unit and Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit – Residential Zones” to address comments from the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to align with current state law, and to address Housing Element programs, and find it exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 21080.17 of the Public Resources Code and Section 15282(h) of the CEQA Guidelines.
CEQA: The proposed ordinance is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080.17 of the Public Resources Code and Section 15282(h) of the CEQA Guidelines because it is an accessory dwelling unit ordinance that is implementing the provisions of the Government Code related to ADUs and JADUs.
REPORTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS, AND COMMITTEE UPDATES
City Manager, City Attorney and Council Members report on their various assignments and liaison roles and Council requests for scheduling future items.
ADJOURNMENT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AGENDAS: Agendas and material are posted on the City’s website on the Friday preceding each Council Meeting and can be viewed on the City's website at www.cityofsanmateo.org . Any supplemental material distributed to the Council after the posting of the agenda will be made part of the official record.
WATCHING A MEETING ON TV: City Council meetings are broadcast live on Comcast/channel 27, Wave/channel 26, or AT&T/channel 99.
For transmission problems during the broadcast, please call (650) 522-7099. For all other broadcast comments, call (650) 522-7040, Monday-Friday, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m.
WATCHING A MEETING ON A COMPUTER: There are three ways to stream. 1) Public Meeting Portal www.cityofsanmateo.org/publicmeetings 2) City YouTube channel and stream it on YouTube: http://youtube.com/CityofSanMateo 3) Watch TV live stream: https://www.cityofsanmateo.org/193/Channel-San-Mateo-Live-Stream
PUBLIC COMMENTS/REQUEST TO SPEAK
Prior to the Meeting
Send comments to: [email protected] until 4 p.m. the day of the meeting.
During the meeting
By Zoom: Click the link at the top of the agenda and you’ll be added to the meeting. All attendees are muted by default. When the item of interest is open for consideration, select the “Raise Your Hand” icon and you will be called on at the appropriate time.
By telephone: Call (408) 638-0968 and enter the conference ID found at the top of the meeting agenda. When the item of interest is open for consideration, select *9 to raise your hand. When called upon, press *6 to unmute, state your name and provide your comments.
In Person: At the meeting complete a “Request to Speak” form. Organized Group and Presentations: Up to five (5) minutes for a group presentation, with as many speakers as can be accommodated within that time allowance. To qualify for a group presentation, all individuals associated with the presentation must be clearly identified and confirmed as in attendance at the meeting. Presentation materials must be submitted to [email protected] one (1) business day in advance of the meeting.
ACCESSIBILITY: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and to ensure meaningful access for all participants, including those with limited English proficiency, individuals requiring special accommodations or language assistance to participate in this meeting may contact the City Clerk’s Office at (650) 522-7040 or [email protected] . Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable 5 of 1110
arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
6 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Agenda Report
City Hall
330 W. 20th Avenue
San Mateo CA 94403
www.cityofsanmateo.org
Agenda Number: 2 Section Name: CONSENT CALENDAR Account Number: 10-1511 File ID: 26-10852 TO: City Council
FROM: Alex Khojikian, City Manager
PREPARED BY: City Clerk's Office
MEETING DATE: January 26, 2026
SUBJECT:
City Council Meeting Minutes – Approval
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the minutes of the special meeting of the City Council held on December 15, 2025.
BUDGET IMPACT:
There is no budgetary impact associated with this minutes approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
This minutes approval is not a project subject to CEQA, because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).)
NOTICE PROVIDED
All meeting noticing requirements were met.
ATTACHMENTS
Att 1 - Minutes 2025-12-15
STAFF CONTACT
Martin McTaggart, City Clerk
[email protected]
(650) 522-7042
7 of 1110
City Council Special Meeting Minutes – 12/15/2025 Page 1
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Adam Loraine, Mayor
Nicole Fernandez, Deputy Mayor
Danielle Cwirko-Godycki
Lisa Diaz Nash
Rob Newsom Jr.
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Special Meeting Minutes
City Council
City Hall
330 W. 20th Avenue
San Mateo CA 94403
www.cityofsanmateo.org
December 15, 2025
San Mateo Main Library – Oak Room 6:00 PM
Special Meeting
CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 p.m.
Roll Call
Present: Mayor Loraine, Deputy Mayor Fernandez, Council Members: Cwirko-Godycki and Diaz Nash, Newsom AB 2449 Requests and Considerations for Meeting Participation by Teleconference due to Just Cause or Emergency Circumstances – there were no requests.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following items, 1 through 4 were considered to be routine by the City Council. After the titles of the items were read by the Deputy City Clerk, the public was invited to comment and there were no speakers. Motion passed 5-0.
Moved: Cwirko-Godycki, Seconded: Fernandez
Ayes: Loraine, Newsom, Fernandez, Cwirko-Godycki, Diaz Nash Noes: None
1. Bermuda Drive Bridge Replacement Project – Agreement Approve an agreement with Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. in the amount of $887,000 for inspection and materials testing services for the Bermuda Drive Bridge Replacement Project (Project); establish a contingency reserve of $89,000; and authorize the Public Works Director to execute the agreement in substantially the form presented and issue change orders as allowed by the agreement documents within the contingency amount.
2. Community Development Permit Tracking Software Agreement – Amendment Approve Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement with Tyler Technologies, Inc. for the annual service maintenance/support fee increase for the current year and the remaining three years of the five-year agreement in the amount of $862,012.77; and authorize the Community Development Director to execute the Amendment in substantially the form presented.
3. Citywide Operations Management System – Amendment
Approve Amendment No. 1 to the Master Services Agreement with OpenGov, Inc. to replace the Integration Toolkit product with the Asset Management Systems Integration product offered by OpenGov, Inc. in order to interface the City’s new Customer Relationship Management system with its existing operations management system; and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment in substantially the form presented and to issue no-cost amendments as allowed within the agreement documents in substantially the form presented and to issue no-cost amendments as allowed within the agreement documents.
4. Excess Workers' Compensation Insurance Policy for CY 2026, and CY 2027 – Approval Approve the purchase of excess workers' compensation insurance from Midwest Employers' Casualty Company in an amount projected to be $574,924 ($287,462 annually) for the two-year period commencing January 1, 2026, and ending December 31, 2027.
Enactment: Resolution No. 118 (2025)
8 of 1110
City Council Special Meeting Minutes – 12/15/2025 Page 2
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
PUBLIC COMMENT
Taso Zografos expressed concerns regarding the Humboldt Street bike lanes and the related public outreach process. Ryan commented on skate park conditions and requested improved engagement with the skateboarding community.
OLD BUSINESS
5. Wet Weather Preparations – Update
Matt Fabry, Director of Public Works, gave the presentation.
Public Comment: Rich Hedges thanked the Public Works team for their wet weather preparation efforts.
Council asked questions and provided comments. Council thanked staff for progress to date and discussed potential outcomes of the Storm Drain Master Plan, including the use of updated modeling to identify infrastructure and maintenance needs. Council discussed next steps for lagoon dredging, including strategies to increase bid competitiveness, anticipated timelines, community impacts, and options for reuse or disposal of dredged material. Council inquired about remaining homes in FEMA flood zones. Staff noted that a potential North Central sandbag station remains under consideration and that efforts will continue to identify a feasible location.
6. Economic Development Work Plan 2026-2029 — Adoption
Jennifer Chen, Economic Development Manager, gave the presentation.
Public Comment: Erica Wood spoke in support of the economic development work plan and offered the Chamber’s support for its implementation. Vince Siminitus encouraged recognition and continuation of the City’s age-friendly business certification program.
Council asked questions and made comments. Council emphasized aligning City branding with partners such as the Chamber, amending the workplan to include policy supporting local small businesses, and ensuring economic development plans include fostering a clean and safe business environment. Council also discussed increasing opportunities for public-private partnerships, lessons learned from past experiences, and strategies to strengthen downtown and other neighborhoods. Additional discussion included the need for clear performance metrics (such as sales tax, unemployment, and vacancy rates), continued outreach with business districts (including 25th Avenue), and potential initiatives that may require future Council consideration and direction.
Motion to adopt Economic Development Work Plan 2026-2029. Motion passed 5-0.
Moved: Newsom, Seconded: Cwirko-Godycki
Ayes: Loraine, Newsom, Fernandez, Cwirko-Godycki, Diaz Nash Noes: None
STUDY SESSION
7. City Council Priority List Fiscal Year 2025-26 — Progress Report Zachary Reda, Senior Management Analyst, gave the presentation.
Public Comment: Trina Pierce expressed concerns regarding the item, citing potential community impacts and requesting Council consideration of alternatives and/or additional analysis prior to implementation Council asked questions and made comments. Council discussed timing for potential community budgeting efforts, commended staff for emergency preparedness training, and discussed economic development 9 of 1110
City Council Special Meeting Minutes – 12/15/2025 Page 3 initiatives. Council also received updates on RV enforcement and ongoing coordination on food truck regulations and compliance. Additional discussion included school-based service officer staffing challenges due to funding, considerations for transitioning to a greener vehicle fleet (including charging infrastructure needs) by 2035, and exploring grant opportunities. The Council also brought up train noise concerns and while progress has been made, staff is continuing to work with Caltrain to ensure noise levels remain within the lowest decibel limits allowable.
NEW BUSINESS
8. City Council Special Meeting Start Time — Direction
Chantal Eaton, Deputy City Clerk, gave the presentation.
Public Comment: no speakers
Council asked questions and made comments. Council provided direction to begin meetings with a 6:00 p.m. start time on a trial basis starting in January, with a six-month review.
REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
City Manager, City Attorney and Council Members report on their various assignments and liaison roles and Council requests for scheduling future items.
ADJOURNMENT –The meeting adjourned at 9:37 p.m. to Closed Session.
The Council adjourned with a moment of silence to honor the victims of the recent antisemitic attack in Australia and recent tragedy at Brown University in Rhode Island.
CLOSED SESSION
9. Conference with Legal Counsel – Existing Litigation
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9) Name of case: Christopher Tofavaha v. City of San Mateo, San Mateo Superior Court Case No.: 25-CIV-04849
APPROVED BY: SUBMITTED BY:
Adam Loraine, Mayor Martin McTaggart, City Clerk
10 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Agenda Report
City Hall
330 W. 20th Avenue
San Mateo CA 94403
www.cityofsanmateo.org
Agenda Number: 3 Section Name: CONSENT CALENDAR Account Number: 10-1511 File ID: 26-10830 TO: City Council
FROM: Alex Khojikian, City Manager
PREPARED BY: City Clerk's Office
MEETING DATE: January 26, 2026
SUBJECT:
Ceremonial Street Naming Application Honoring Former Mayor Jerry Hill — Approval RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the application from Deputy Mayor Fernandez and Council Member Diaz Nash for the ceremonial street naming of O’Farrell Street to honor former Mayor Jerry Hill, consistent with the City’s Ceremonial Street Naming Policy adopted by Resolution No. 109 (2025).
BACKGROUND:
On November 17, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 109 (2025) (Attachment 1), establishing a policy framework through which the City Council may recognize individuals for outstanding contributions to the community through the designation of a ceremonial street name.
On January 6, 2026, the City Clerk’s Office received an application submitted by Deputy Mayor Nicole Fernandez and Council Member Lisa Diaz Nash, requesting ceremonial recognition of former Mayor Jerry Hill. The application was reviewed by the City Clerk’s Office and found to be substantially compliant with the eligibility and procedural requirements outlined in Resolution No. 109 (2025).
Consistent with the policy, the application included a written statement addressing the eligibility criteria, which require at least ten (10) years of community involvement, an extraordinary and sustained voluntary commitment to the community, or significant contributions to the City of San Mateo. The submitted statement summarized the proposed honoree’s public service, including service on the San Mateo City Council (including one term as Mayor), the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, the California State Assembly, and the California State Senate.
The application proposes O’Farrell Street as the location for the ceremonial street designation. The policy specifies that ceremonial street names do not replace or modify the legal street name and are implemented through the placement of a ceremonial street sign topper. The policy further provides that ceremonial street names should generally be located on streets of civic or community significance. O’Farrell Street, immediately adjoining 20th Avenue, has served as a primary access corridor to City Hall since 1962.
If approved by the City Council, City staff will coordinate the fabrication and installation of the ceremonial street sign topper in accordance with the standards and placement requirements established in Resolution No. 109 (2025). In addition, staff will provide written notification to all residential and commercial properties located on the affected street block(s) in advance of installation.
The application requests that the ceremonial designation be installed for an indefinite duration, consistent with the policy framework.
11 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
BUDGET IMPACT:
The estimated cost for fabrication and installation of the ceremonial street sign topper is approximately $1,150. Sufficient funds are available within the City Council budget to cover these costs, as well as ancillary expenses associated with required written notifications and the coordination of a ceremonial unveiling event.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
This ceremonial street naming application is not a project subject to CEQA, because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).)
NOTICE PROVIDED
All meeting noticing requirements were met.
ATTACHMENTS
Att 1 – Resolution No. 109 (2025)
STAFF CONTACT
Martin McTaggart, City Clerk
[email protected]
(650) 522-7042
12 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
RESOLUTION NO. 109 (2025)
APPROVING A POLICY FOR THE CEREMONIAL NAMING OF STREETS WHEREAS, the San Mateo City Council desires to recognize individuals that are of particular importance to the City of San Mateo or have made significant contributions to improving the quality of life in the City by ceremonially naming sections of public streets in their honor; and WHEREAS, currently, there is no formal policy addressing guidelines for the content or placement of ceremonial street signs; and
WHEREAS, a policy is needed to ensure consistency, proper neighborhood outreach, traffic safety, and appropriate sign content; and
WHEREAS, this Resolution authorizes the City Council to confer ceremonial names on public streets and allow for the installation of appropriate signage, which shall be distinct from, and not change or replace, existing legal street names and signs.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY FINDS and RESOLVES that:
1. This Resolution is categorically exempt from CEQA as an “ existing facility,” because it consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use. ( CEQA Guidelines Section 15301.)
2. Candidates for ceremonial street names must exhibit a minimum of 10 years of community involvement or demonstrated an extraordinary, consistent and voluntary commitment to the community, or have had contributed significantly to the City of San Mateo.
Ceremonial street names shall be in the form of a “Sign Topper,” which is a sheet metal sign that is placed on top of the standard City street sign identification and shall adhere to the following specifications:
a. Ceremonial street names will not change or replace existing legal street names and signs. b. Ceremonial street names should generally be placed on streets of civic and community significance.
c. Only entire blocks of public streets may be granted ceremonial street names. d. Staff will identify streets with a limited number of blocks, and each street sign on each block will receive a Street Topper.
e. Ceremonial street names must be the name of an individual. f. A ceremonial street naming application may only be initiated by two current City Councilmembers.
g. A ceremonial street Sign Topper must include the word “Honorary”, and be a brown sign with white lettering.
h. Only one ceremonial Sign Topper may be placed on a single street block. i. Only one Sign Topper may be placed on any pole.
Docusign Envelope ID: 82C1B684- AE2E- 4E26-A59C- 15DF844B126B 13 of 1110
Resolution No. 109 (2025) Page 2 of 2
Ceremonial Street Naming Policy — Adoption
j. Sign Toppers shall not be attached to traffic signal mast arms or traffic signal poles. k. Ceremonial names shall not duplicate any currently existing official street names. l. No individual may receive City Council approval for a Sign Topper recognition on more than one street or intersection.
m. Only one Ceremonial Street Sign Topper may be approved by City Council per fiscal year, however exceptions in some years can be made as circumstances warrant based on City Council direction.
n. Staff will send out notices to all residential and commercial addresses on the street or block in which the Ceremonial Street Sign Topper is added. o. The ceremonial street name will expire in ten years, but the Council may choose to keep the topper for a longer or indefinite period.
RESOLUTION NO. 109 (2025) adopted by the City Council of the City of San Mateo, California, at a regular meeting held on November 17, 2025, by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES: Council Members Newsom, Loraine, Fernandez, Cwirko- Godycki, and Diaz Nash NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTEST:
Chantal Eaton, Deputy City Clerk Robert Newsom Jr., Mayor Docusign Envelope ID: 82C1B684- AE2E- 4E26-A59C- 15DF844B126B 14 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Agenda Report
City Hall
330 W. 20th Avenue
San Mateo CA 94403
www.cityofsanmateo.org
Agenda Number: 4 Section Name: CONSENT CALENDAR Account Number: 10-1511 File ID: 26-10831 TO: City Council
FROM: Alex Khojikian, City Manager
PREPARED BY: City Clerk's Office
MEETING DATE: January 26, 2026
SUBJECT:
2033 La Salle Drive - Zoning Reclassification, Zoning Code Amendment, and Planning Application for an Early Childhood Education Center — Ordinance Adoption
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt an Ordinance to approve a Zoning Reclassification from R1-B to R1-B/Q8, and a Zoning Code Amendment to provide development standards for an educational facility and find it exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption).
BACKGROUND:
On January 12, 2026, the City Council introduced an Ordinance (Attachment 1) to approve a Zoning Reclassification from R1-B to R1-B/Q8 and a Zoning Code Amendment to establish development standards for an educational facility, and to find these actions exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption). Approval of the Ordinance ensures that the City’s Zoning Code provides clear and appropriate development standards for early childhood education facilities, supports the orderly development of community-serving uses, and allows future projects of this type to be reviewed and regulated in a consistent and transparent manner.
If adopted, the Ordinance will become effective 30 days after adoption.
BUDGET IMPACT:
No budget impact is anticipated as a result of this Ordinance adoption.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
The Zoning Reclassification and Zoning Map Amendment are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the Common Sense Exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), as the action is administrative in nature and does not authorize or result in any physical change to the environment.
NOTICE PROVIDED
All meeting noticing requirements were met.
ATTACHMENTS
Att 1 – Draft Ordinance for Zoning Reclassification and Zoning Code Amendment Exhibit A – Zoning Map Reclassification
STAFF CONTACT
Chantal Eaton, Deputy City Clerk
[email protected]
(650) 522-7044
15 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. ____ (2026)
AMENDING TITLE 27 OF THE SAN MATEO MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATED TO QUALIFIED OVERLAY 8 (Q8)
DISTRICTS TO ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THE PROPOSED EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION CENTER IN THE Q8 OVERLAY AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO TO REZONE THE SITE AT 2033 LA SALLE DRIVE FROM R1-B (ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS) TO R1-B/Q8 (ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS, QUALIFIED OVERLAY DISTRICT 8)
WHEREAS, on June 17, 2019, the City Council established the Qualified Overlay District 8 (Q8) designation to provide for the development of land pursuant to standards and regulations that reflect the unique characteristics of educational facilities within residential districts; and WHEREAS, the Carey School (hereinafter referred to as the “Applicant”) submitted Planning Application No. PA-2025-012 to the Planning Division for a Zoning Reclassification, Zoning Map Amendment, Site Plan and Architectural Review, Special Use Permit, and Site Development Planning Application to rezone the property located at 2033 La Salle Drive from R1-B to R1-B/Q8, and to establish and construct an early childhood education center at the same location (collectively referred to as the “Project”) in the City of San Mateo (“City”); and WHEREAS, the City has previously applied Qualified Overlay designations to private educational facilities to address site-specific operational needs; and
WHEREAS, the General Plan 2040 Public Services Facilities Element has a goal to “foster the healthy development and education of children of all abilities, incomes, and backgrounds,” (Goal PSF-6) and a specific policy that encourages childcare centers in residential neighborhoods where they meet the City standards (Policy PSF 6.5); and
WHEREAS, educational facilities are permitted in the R1-B zoning district with a Special Use Permit; however, the single-family development standards do not address the site-specific operational needs of such facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Q8 Overlay addresses the unique characteristics of the educational facility, while limiting the uses on the site and protecting the surrounding uses by requiring a Special Use Permit for all uses within this overlay; and
WHEREAS, the zoning reclassification from R1-B to R1-B/Q8 and zoning code amendment would implement the General Plan by establishing site specific development standards for an educational facility that provides childcare services while protecting the surrounding users; and WHEREAS, on December 9, 2025, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing, at which time the Commission received and considered written and oral evidence, and by a vote of unanimously (4-0), with one commissioner absent, to recommend that the City Council approve the Zoning Reclassification, Zoning Map Amendment, Site Plan and Architectural Review, Special Use Permit, and Site Development Planning Application, subject to the Findings for Approval and Conditions of Approval for Planning Application No. PA-2025-012; and 16 of 1110
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed rezoning and zoning code amendments are consistent with the City’s General Plan because the Q8 overlay zone authorizes deviations from the standards of the underlying R1-B zoning district, the Project includes a Special Use Permit that limits uses on the site and protects the surrounding neighborhood, and the Project otherwise conforms with the Residential Very Low land use designation of the site.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subsection (h) of Section 27.60.180 of the San Mateo Municipal Code is amended as follows:
(h) Q8 (Qualified Overlay District 8) - Limitations and Conditions. The following limitations and conditions shall pertain to the use of the property zoned Q8:
(1) Uses. All uses in this district shall require a special use permit, as set forth in Chapter 27.74 of the Zoning Code.
(2) Development. Future development in this district shall comply with the site plans and conditions of approval in all applicable Planning Applications. Development standards include allowance of awning up to nine (9) feet in height within the rear yard setback. (3) Floor Area Ratio. This district shall have a maximum floor area ratio of 0.39. (4) Parking. Off-site parking facilities shall not be located in excess of 1,000 feet from the project site. Uncovered parking may be allowed within the front and side setback areas. (5) Signage. Signage on the site shall be allowed in accordance with Title 25 of the San Mateo Municipal Code.
Section 2. Environmental Determination. In accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the proposed zoning reclassification and the zoning map amendment are exempt from further environmental review pursuant to the “Common Sense” exemption (14 CCR Section 15061(b)(3)). The Common Sense exemption applies where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the activity may have a significant effect on the environment. The proposed zoning reclassification and zoning overlay do not authorize physical development or ground disturbance on the site. Rather, the amendment provides additional allowances for potential future use of the site as an educational facility; it does not approve a specific development proposal or permit construction activities.
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 27.60.180(h), all uses within the Q8 Overlay require approval of a Special Use Permit (SUP), and any development of the site requires Site Plan and Architectural Review (SPAR). Therefore, the proposed zoning reclassification and code amendment only change the site’s zoning designation and do not, in themselves, authorize any construction, demolition, or land disturbance that could result in physical environmental impacts.
Section 3. Legislative findings. At a duly noticed public hearing on January 12, 2026, the City Council of the City of San Mateo reviewed and considered the associated staff report and attachments thereto, the Categorical Exemption, together with comments received during the public review process, and hereby finds and determines as follows:
17 of 1110
1. CONFORMANCE WITH GENERAL PLAN. The City Council finds and determines that the proposed zoning code amendment and zoning reclassification from One Family Dwellings (R1- B) to One Family Dwellings with Qualified District Overlay 8 (R1-B/Q8) are in conformance with the Residential Very Low land use designation of the General Plan of the City of San Mateo. The amendment establishes development standards for an educational facility providing childcare services within a residential district, consistent with General Plan Land Use Policy 3.5 and Public Services Facilities Policy 6.5, which encourage childcare centers in residential neighborhoods where they meet City standards. While educational facilities are currently permitted in the R1-B zoning district with a Special Use Permit, no specific development standards exist to address the unique characteristics of such uses within residential areas. The Qualified Overlay designations have previously been applied to private educational facilities to address site-specific operational needs. Extending the Q8 Overlay and amending the Zoning Code would implement the General Plan policies by establishing tailored development standards that facilitate the development of educational facilities in appropriate residential settings.
2. INTENT OF ZONING CODE. The overlay district and rezoning conform to the purpose of Municipal Code Section 27.60.180 in that the rezoning provides standards for the use of land with unique site characteristics as a private educational facility.
Section 4. Zoning Map. The Zoning Map of the City of San Mateo is hereby amended to indicate as follows: the property generally known as APN: 039-040-080 as depicted in Exhibit A, attached hereto, shall be reclassified from the R1-B (One Family Dwellings ) Zoning District to the R1-B/Q8 (One Family Dwellings , Qualified Overlay District 8) Zoning District and the Zoning Map shall be amended to reflect this reclassification.
Section 5. Severability. In the event any section, clause or provision of this ordinance shall be determined invalid or unconstitutional, such section, clause or provision shall be deemed severable and all other sections or portions hereof shall remain in full force and effect. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase be declared unconstitutional.
Section 6. Publication. This Ordinance shall be published in summary in a newspaper of general circulation, posted in the City Clerk's Office, and posted on the City's website, all in accord with Section 2.15 of the City Charter.
Section 7. Legislative History and Effective Date. This ordinance was introduced on Clerk to complete., and adopted on Clerk to complete., and shall be effective 30 days after its adoption. 18 of 1110
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF SAN MATEO
ZONING MAP RECLASSIFICATION
For PA-2025-012 2033 La Salle Drive, Zoning Reclassification Amend the Zoning Map for the 2033 La Salle Drive site, APN: 039-040-080, from R1-B One Family Dwellings to R1-B/Q8 One Family Dwellings, Qualified Overlay District 8, to allow for a private educational facility. The Project site is circled below (see arrow) with the associated amended Zoning Map color.
R1-B/Q8
19 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Agenda Report
City Hall
330 W. 20th Avenue
San Mateo CA 94403
www.cityofsanmateo.org
Agenda Number: 5 Section Name: CONSENT CALENDAR Account Number: 10-2131 File ID: 26-10835 TO: City Council
FROM: Alex Khojikian, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Finance Department
MEETING DATE: January 26, 2026
SUBJECT:
Enterprise Resource Planning System Subscription Increase — Approval RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a subscription growth and expansion increase to the City’s agreement with Workday for an enterprise resource planning system for years five (5) through ten (10) of the existing agreement in the amount of $242,000, for a new total amount of $4,513,883; establish a contingency reserve of $30,000; and authorize the Finance Director to execute the subscription growth acknowledgement in substantially the form presented and issue change orders within the contingency amount.
BACKGROUND:
In February 2022, the City of San Mateo entered into an agreement with Workday for software subscription, training, and delivery assurance costs related to the City’s enterprise resource planning (ERP) application. The Workday ERP supports the City’s core administrative functions of Human Capital Management (HCM), Payroll, and Core Financials and is used by all City of San Mateo and San Mateo Consolidated Fire Department employees. The City is now entering the 5th year of the 10-year software subscription agreement with Workday.
As part of the original Master Services Agreement with Workday, the City must report annually on various Workday usage metrics from the prior year to evaluate whether a higher annual subscription fee is needed. For the first years of the agreement, Workday accepted a baseline estimate of all the City’s usage metrics provided in January 2022 using 2021 data, because the Payroll and Human Resources modules had not been implemented yet.
Since the City went live with the Human Resources and Payroll modules in Workday in March 2025, City staff needed to provide Workday its first official headcount in addition to other usage metrics as part of the annual reporting due in January 2026, covering usage metrics from 12/26/24 – 12/25/25. The updated headcount, the first in four years, showed an increase in the City’s overall system users due to several factors including some increases in staffing, lower employee vacancy rates, and an updated method for counting part-time employees in the Workday system. As a result, the total reported headcount for the City of San Mateo and San Mateo Consolidated Fire Department was 10.4% higher in 2025 than in 2021.
In accordance with the Master Services Agreement, the subscription for each year may be adjusted and calculated using a predefined growth and expansion table. Given the updated usage metrics provided for 2025, Year 5 of the agreement with Workday (2/24/2026 through 2/23/2027) will cost $40,382 more than originally estimated due to the updated headcount.
In addition, City staff does not anticipate a change in the overall headcount in the remaining years of our agreement with Workday and expect the new baseline annual subscription cost to remain. To support this increase in subscription costs for Years 5 through 10, City staff recommends approving the Subscription Growth Acknowledgement (Attachment 1), increasing the agreement amount by $242,000 for the remaining 6 years of the agreement with Workday, for a total 20 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
agreement amount of $4,513,883, and a $30,000 contingency to cover any unanticipated changes in subscription costs due to other usage metric increases.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The current subscription fee for Year 5 of the Workday contract is $382,336 and is included in the Information Technology Department's operating budget. The additional subscription fee for FY 25-26 is $40,382. Given some budget savings in other areas, the Department can absorb the additional cost this year and will budget for the additional subscription fees in the next budget year.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
This Council action is not a project subject to CEQA, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the approval of an increase in yearly subscriptions for the City’s ERP system may have a significant effect on the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).)
NOTICE PROVIDED
All meeting noticing requirements were met.
ATTACHMENTS
Att 1 – Workday Subscription Growth Acknowledgment
STAFF CONTACT
Abby Veeser, Finance Director
[email protected]
(650) 522-7102
21 of 1110
00541604.0- Confidential
Subscription Growth Acknowledgement between Workday and City of San Mateo ©2025 Workday v25.10 Page 1 of 2
SUBSCRIPTION GROWTH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT # 00541604.0
Customer Name City of San Mateo
Workday Entity Name Workday, Inc.
Address: http://www.workday.com/contracting-entity-addresses MSA Effective Date February 23, 2022
Effective Date The date beneath Customer’s signature below Order Term February 24, 2026 through February 23, 2027
Currency USD
Underlying Order Forms 252735
Total Subscription Fee 40,382
The purpose of this Subscription Growth Acknowledgement is to document the increase in the number of FSE Workers and Subscription Rights, as applicable, for Customer’s use of the Service pursuant to the terms set forth in the Underlying Order Form(s).
Payment # Payment Due Date Payment Amount
1 Due in accordance with the MSA, invoiced upon Effective Date 40,382 Total Payment Amount 40,382
FSE Workers Subscription Fees
SKU Service Start Added New
Annual
Rate (Per
FSE
Worker)
Prorated
for Order
Term
CHCM Core Human Capital Management
670 70 740 529.78 37,085
TLO Talent Optimization
LRN Learning
MCNF Media Cloud - No Fee
REC Recruiting
FIN Core Financials
GM Grants Management
PLNF Financial Planning
PRJT Projects
TT Time Tracking
EXP Expenses
PRO Procurement
USP Payroll for United States 670 66 736 49.96 3,297
Customer Contact Information Billing, In Care of
Contact Name Abby Veeser
Street Address
City/Town,
State/Region/County
Zip/Post Code, Country
330 W 20th Ave
San Mateo
California
94403, United States
Phone/Fax#
Email (Required) [email protected]
22 of 1110
00541604.0- Confidential
Subscription Growth Acknowledgement between Workday and City of San Mateo ©2025 Workday v25.10 Page 2 of 2
This Subscription Growth Acknowledgement is subject to the additional terms in the above-referenced MSA, and in the Underlying Order Form(s). Customer has reviewed and agrees that the figures in the tables above are accurate. Customer is purchasing the Service that is currently available. All remittance advice and invoice inquiries can be directed to [email protected].
As of the date signed by Customer (the “Effective Date”), this Subscription Growth Acknowledgement is accepted and agreed to by Customer and Workday.
City of San Mateo
Signature
Name
Title
Date Signed
23 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Agenda Report
City Hall
330 W. 20th Avenue
San Mateo CA 94403
www.cityofsanmateo.org
Agenda Number: 6 Section Name: CONSENT CALENDAR Account Number: CC_0610 File ID: 26-10811 TO: City Council
FROM: Alex Khojikian, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Human Resources Department
MEETING DATE: January 26, 2026
SUBJECT:
Revisions and Retitle of Crime and Intelligence Analyst Position — Approval RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution to revise the Crime and Intelligence Analyst job specification and retitle as the Real Time Information Center (RTIC) Coordinator position, located in the Police Department.
BACKGROUND:
In October 2024, the Police Department launched the Real Time Information Center (RTIC) to serve as a centralized hub for utilizing live camera feeds, data platforms, and advanced technologies in support of field operations. Since its inception, the RTIC has quickly demonstrated its value, relying on a combination of overtime staffing and light-duty officers to ensure coverage. The RTIC has now reached a stage where clear oversight, consistent management, and strategic direction are necessary. As a result, there is an operational need for an RTIC Coordinator to ensure efficiency and long-term success of this centralized center.
In August 2025, the Crime and Intelligence Analyst resigned, creating a vacancy. There is only one position in this classification. Since then, newly acquired technologies have significantly mitigated the operational gaps traditionally filled by an analyst, shifting the Department’s needs from crime analysis to overall coordination of the RTIC.
After a thorough review of the classification and operational needs, the Police Department and Human Resources Department recommend the Crime and Intelligence Analyst classification be revised to reflect the duties and responsibilities of a RTIC Coordinator.
BUDGET IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact as RTIC Coordinator would assume the same salary range and exempt status currently allocated to the vacant Crime and Intelligence Analyst classification.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
This reclassification is not a project subject to CEQA, because it can be seen with certainty that it will not cause a physical change in the environment. (Public Resources Code Section 21065.)
NOTICE PROVIDED
All meeting noticing requirements were met.
ATTACHMENTS
Att 1 – Proposed Resolution
24 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Exhibit A - Job Specification: Real Time Information Center (RTIC) Coordinator Exhibit B - Job Specification: Amended Crime and Intelligence Analyst to Real time Information Center (RTIC) Coordinator
STAFF CONTACT
Yuliya Shukhat, Sr. Risk Management Analyst
[email protected]
650-522-7263
25 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
RESOLUTION NO.__(2026)
JOB SPECIFICATION UPDATES POLICE DEPARTMENT
WHEREAS, pursuant to the San Mateo Municipal Code Section 2.57.030(d), approval of new classifications and related job specifications, salary schedules, compensation changes, elimination or reinstatement of positions, reallocation of positions, reclassifications, and revisions of job specifications must be approved by City Council Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the proposed changes as detailed below are in response to Police Department’s request to convert a vacant Crime and Intelligence Analyst position to a Real Time Information Center (RTIC) Coordinator position within the Police Department; and
WHEREAS, the job specification for Real Time Information Center (RTIC) Coordinator is attached here as Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, amended Crime and Intelligence Analyst to Real time Information Center (RTIC) Coordinator job specification is attached here as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the employee association representing the impacted classification has been informed of the proposed change and has not brought forth any objections or concerns.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that:
1. Reclassification of a vacant position is not subject to CEQA because it can be seen with certainty that they will not cause a physical change in the environment.
2. Job Specification for Real Time Information Center (RTIC) Coordinator is approved and attached as Exhibit A.
26 of 1110
REAL TIME INFORMATION CENTER COORDINATOR
DEFINITION
Under general direction, oversees the operational and administrative functions of the Real Time Information Center (RTIC), ensuring the seamless integration of technology, personnel, and processes, responsible for strategic planning, decision making, comprehensive reports, and fostering a collaborative environment, playing a pivotal role in enhancing public safety through effective surveillance, data analysis, and coordinated response efforts.
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS
The RTIC Coordinator is a non-sworn classification responsible for overseeing all RTIC operations. This role manages resources, develops and implements training requirements, and ensures the RTIC is functioning effectively. This position provides technical and functional oversight of RTIC to ensure the delivery of timely, accurate real-time intelligence to support field operations and departmental decision-making. The RTIC also participates directly in RTIC operations during peak periods, coordinates scheduling and staffing, and represents the City in related initiatives. Work requires a high level of independent judgment, technical expertise, and the ability to collaborate effectively with sworn personnel, specialized units, and external partners.
SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED
Receives directions from the Police Technical Services Administrator. Does not exercise direct supervision over professional staff.
EXAMPLES OF ESSENTIAL DUTIES - Duties may include, but are not limited to, the following:
Efficiently manages resources, including personnel, budget, and technology, to enhance the overall effectiveness of the center.
Develops training programs and ensures the continuous professional development of personnel assigned to the RTIC.
Produces complex reports and bulletins for the Police Department to develop strategies and tactics to effectively prevent and control crime.
Assists the Police Department with real-time information sharing; utilizes video feeds, intelligence databases, and other systems as needed.
Assists operations and management personnel in planning the deployment of resources for the 27 of 1110
City of San Mateo
Real Time Information Center Coordinator
prevention and suppression of criminal activity.
Creates and maintains informational databases; uses complex databases and software applications utilized by the RTIC.
Participates in operations with specialized units to provide real time intelligence through radio communication and other authorized communication platforms.
Coordinates the scheduling of the RTIC, ensuring coverage when applicable.
Acts as an operator for the RTIC during peak operation times.
Monitors the performance of operators assigned to the RTIC for compliance with policies, procedures, and relevant laws.
Develops and implements work related procedures to satisfy requirements of local, state, and federal laws.
Represents the City in interdepartmental, interagency task forces, community, and professional meetings as required; makes presentations as necessary.
Testifies in court.
Performs other related duties as assigned.
QUALIFICATIONS
Knowledge of:
• Methods of identifying essential information.
• Investigative and identification methods and techniques. • The methods and procedures of operating radio transmitting and receiving equipment. • Specialized computer software including Computer Aided Dispatch, video systems, and intelligence systems.
• Federal, state, and local laws, as they relate to the essential functions of this position. • Standard office practices, procedures, methods, and equipment. • Organizing, maintaining, and retrieving data from electronic files.
Ability to:
• Identify complex problems and review related information to develop and evaluate options and implement solutions.
• Use independent reasoning to solve complex problems.
• Prioritize and make fast and accurate decisions.
28 of 1110
City of San Mateo
Real Time Information Center Coordinator
• Effectively communicate orally, verbally and in writing with coworkers, law enforcement personnel, supervisors, and to the public.
• Work with restricted law enforcement documents and highly confidential information. • Establish and maintain cooperative working relationships with those contacted in the course of work.
• Attend work and perform duties on a regular and consistent basis.
EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING GUIDELINES
Any combination equivalent to experience and training that would likely provide the required knowledge and abilities are qualifying. A typical way to obtain knowledge and abilities would be:
Experience:
Three (3) years of experience with a law enforcement agency that includes the operation of transmitting and receiving radio equipment. Two (2) of those years must include experience with crime intelligence, investigations, and/or emergency dispatch.
Training:
Equivalent to a bachelor’s degree from an accredited college or university is highly desirable.
License or Certificates:
Possession of Part 107 certificate (Remote Pilot Certificate) to fly drones with the Police Department’s drone team within the first year of employment.
Required Special Qualification:
Must successfully complete a thorough law enforcement background investigation.
ADA SPECIAL REQUIREMENT:
Essential duties require the following physical abilities and work environment:
Ability to work in a standard office environment.
ADOPTED CC:
BARGAINING UNIT: MANAGEMENT UNIT
FLSA EXEMPT
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL: MANAGEMENT
PRE APPT-MEDICAL: NO
SAFETY SENSITIVE: NO
REQUIRED HARASSMENT PREVENTION TRAINING: NON-SUPERVISORY 29 of 1110
City of San Mateo
Real Time Information Center Coordinator
DOT: NO
FORM 700: NO
JOB CODES: 2602
30 of 1110
CRIME AND INTELLIGENCE ANALYST
REAL TIME INFORMATION CENTER COORDINATOR
DEFINITION
To perform analysis of the underlying reasons and causes of crime; examine criminal activities to identify crime series, patterns, and trends; identify investigative leads by determining related cases and potential suspects; forecast occurrences of crime; disseminate analytical findings to departmental personnel and others; works in special projects outside the area of specialization with considerable independence; and to do related work as required.
Under general direction, oversees the operational and administrative functions of the Real Time Information Center (RTIC), ensuring the seamless integration of technology, personnel, and processes, responsible for strategic planning, decision making, comprehensive reports, and fostering a collaborative environment, playing a pivotal role in enhancing public safety through effective surveillance, data analysis, and coordinated response efforts.
DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS
The Crime and Intelligence Analyst is a non-sworn classification primarily responsible for conducting complex crime analyses.
The RTIC Coordinator is a non-sworn classification responsible for overseeing all RTIC operations. This role manages resources, develops and implements training requirements, and ensures the RTIC is functioning effectively. This position provides technical and functional oversight of RTIC to ensure the delivery of timely, accurate real-time intelligence to support field operations and departmental decision-making. The RTIC also participates directly in RTIC operations during peak periods, coordinates scheduling and staffing, and represents the City in related initiatives. Work requires a high level of independent judgment, technical expertise, and the ability to collaborate effectively with sworn personnel, specialized units, and external partners.
SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED
Receives direction from higher level departmental sworn or administrative management personnel. the Police Technical Services Administrator. Does not exercise direct supervision over professional staff.
EXAMPLES OF DUTIES - Duties may include, but are not limited to, the following:
31 of 1110
City of San Mateo
Crime and Intelligence Analyst
Analyze and determine trends in criminal activity, identify criminal offenders, trends, and patterns of crime; convey this information in various formats to appropriate department personnel.
Compile, analyze, correlate, and evaluate data from crime, intelligence and arrest reports, law enforcement databases and other sources, looking for patterns and trends.
Study offender and victim characteristics and methods of operation.
Analyze dates, times, geography, and environment of crimes to forecast date, time, and location of next crime in a series.
Summarize and analyze qualitative and quantitative data using calculations such as frequencies, percent changes, cross-tabulations, variation, and correlation.
Produce complex reports and bulletins for the police department to develop strategies and tactics to effectively prevent and control crime.
Manage date available to the public via the department’s data transparency webpage including evaluating, recommending, and implementing content and design improvements to increase effectiveness and efficiency; perform routine updates of data provided on the site.
Assists operations and management personnel in planning the deployment of resources for the prevention and suppression of criminal activity.
Establish criminal profiles that include prior crimes and criminal relationships as well as criminal organizations.
Develop crime-mapping analysis of geographic data from police reports, calls for service, and other sources.
Create and maintain informational databases; use complex databases and software applications such as geographic information systems (GIS) mapping tools.
Develops and implements work related procedures to satisfy requirements of local, state, and federal laws.
Represent the City in interdepartmental, interagency task forces, community, and professional meetings as required; make presentations as necessary.
Efficiently manages resources, including personnel, budget, and technology, to enhance the overall effectiveness of the center.
Develops training programs and ensures the continuous professional development of personnel assigned to the RTIC.
32 of 1110
City of San Mateo
Crime and Intelligence Analyst
Produces complex reports and bulletins for the Police Department to develop strategies and tactics to effectively prevent and control crime.
Assists the Police Department with real-time information sharing; utilizes video feeds, intelligence databases, and other systems as needed.
Assists operations and management personnel in planning the deployment of resources for the prevention and suppression of criminal activity.
Creates and maintains informational databases; uses complex databases and software applications utilized by the RTIC.
Participates in operations with specialized units to provide real time intelligence through radio communication and other authorized communication platforms.
Coordinates the scheduling of the RTIC, ensuring coverage when applicable.
Acts as an operator for the RTIC during peak operation times.
Monitors the performance of operators assigned to the RTIC for compliance with policies, procedures, and relevant laws.
Develops and implements work related procedures to satisfy requirements of local, state, and federal laws.
Represents the City in interdepartmental, interagency task forces, community, and professional meetings as required; makes presentations as necessary.
Testifies in court.
QUALIFICATIONS
Knowledge of:
Methods of identifying essential information.
Organizing, maintaining, and retrieving data from electronic files.
Research methods as they apply to crime analysis.
Statistical analysis techniques.
Collecting, interpreting, and evaluating narrative and statistical data pertaining to public safety matters and translating these results into coherent, well-written reports with effective recommendations.
33 of 1110
City of San Mateo
Crime and Intelligence Analyst
Data processing to produce bulletins and reports including graphics such as charts, maps, pictures, and diagrams; electronic matrixes and spreadsheets; statistical formulae including frequency, percentages, percentage change, sum, average, standard deviation, regression analysis, forecasting and correlations.
Planning, organizing and prioritizing responsibilities so that projects and reports are completed in a timely and accurate manner.
Performing highly complex analyses utilizing current industry standard methodologies.
Federal, state, and local laws as they relate to the essential functions of this position.
Using independent reasoning to solve complex problems.
Standard office practices, procedures, methods, and equipment.
Specialized computer software, GIS, and crime analysis applications. Investigative and identification methods and techniques. The methods and procedures of operating radio transmitting and receiving equipment. Specialized computer software including Computer Aided Dispatch, video systems, and intelligence systems.
Federal, state, and local laws, as they relate to the essential functions of this position. Standard office practices, procedures, methods, and equipment. Organizing, maintaining, and retrieving data from electronic files.
Ability to:
Identify complex problems and review related information to develop and evaluate options and implement solutions.
Use independent reasoning to solve complex problems.
Prioritize and make fast and accurate decisions.
Effectively communicate orally, verbally and in writing with coworkers, law enforcement personnel, supervisors, and to the public.
Work with restricted law enforcement documents and highly confidential information. Establish and maintain cooperative working relationships with those contacted in the course of work.
Attend work and perform duties on a regular and consistent basis.
Operate personal computer with proficiency including spreadsheet expertise and familiarity with law enforcement software.
Perform cross tabulations, create charts and graphs, export objects to other applications. 34 of 1110
City of San Mateo
Crime and Intelligence Analyst
Work with restricted law enforcement documents and highly confidential information.
Use logic and reasoning to identify strengths and weaknesses of alternative solutions, conclusions, or approaches to problems.
Combine separate pieces of information to form specific answers to problems or conclusions.
Effectively convey information to others in presentation form and effectively respond to audience inquiries.
Communication information and ideas in writing and make recommendations in narrative form that are objective, succinct, pertinent, articulate and relevant.
Be self-motivated, perceiving departmental need and performing analysis on own initiative.
Sit at a desk and use a computer and telephone effectively.
Establish and maintain cooperative working relationships with those contacted in the course of work.
Attend work and perform duties on a regular and consistent basis. Ability and willingness to testify in court.
Experience and Training Guidelines
Any combination of experience and education that would likely provide the required knowledge and abilities is qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowledge and abilities would be:
Experience:
Two years of progressively responsible experience performing analytical, crime analysis or intelligence related work, preferably in a law enforcement agency.
Three (3) years of experience with a law enforcement agency that includes the operation of transmitting and receiving radio equipment. Two (2) of those years must include experience with crime intelligence, investigations, and/or emergency dispatch.
Training:
Equivalent to a bachelor’s degree from an accredited college or university is highly desirable. 35 of 1110
City of San Mateo
Crime and Intelligence Analyst
Equivalent to a Bachelor’s Degree from an accredited college or university with major work in statistical analysis, public administration, administration of justice, criminal justice, or a closely related field; OR
Any combination of experience and training which provides the equivalent scope of knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary to perform the work.
License or Certificate:
Possession of a valid Class C California Driver’s License.
Possession of a certification in Crime and Intelligence Analysis from an accredited college or university and/or a POST certificate in Advanced Concepts in Criminal Intelligence, at the time of application, are highly desirable.
A valid certification in Crime and Intelligence Analysis within twelve (12) months of appointment is required.
Possession of Part 107 certificate (Remote Pilot Certificate) to fly drones with the Police Department’s drone team within the first year of employment.
Required Special Qualification:
Must successfully complete a thorough law enforcement background investigation.
ADA Special Requirement:
Essential duties require the following physical abilities and work environment:
Ability to work in a standard office environment.
ADOPTED CC: 8-15-22
BARGAINING UNIT: MANAGEMENT UNIT
FLSA: EXEMPT
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL: MANAGEMENT
PRE APPT-MEDICAL: NO
SAFETY SENSITIVE: NO
REQUIRED HARASSMENT PREVENTION TRAINING: NON-SUPERVISORY DOT: NO
FORM 700: NO
JOB CODES: 2602
36 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Agenda Report
City Hall
330 W. 20th Avenue
San Mateo CA 94403
www.cityofsanmateo.org
Agenda Number: 7 Section Name: CONSENT CALENDAR Account Number: 21-4678 File ID: 25-10566 TO: City Council
FROM: Alex Khojikian, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Public Works Department
MEETING DATE: January 26, 2026
SUBJECT:
County of San Mateo Compost Broker Program — Memorandum of Understanding RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a Memorandum of Understanding with San Mateo County to participate in the Senate Bill 1383 Compost Broker Program; authorize the City Manager to execute the Memorandum of Understanding in substantially the form presented; authorize the City Manager to execute future renewals of the MOU to allow continued participation in the Compost Broker Program, subject to City Council approval of associated costs; and authorize payment to San Mateo County in an amount not to exceed $300,000 for calendar year 2026 program costs.
BACKGROUND:
Senate Bill (SB) 1383 is a short-term climate pollutants reduction act requiring, in part, a statewide 75 percent reduction in the disposal of organic waste compared to 2014 levels by 2025. To meet this goal, the City is required to procure an amount of recovered organics waste product (e.g., compost, mulch) proportional to the population and amount of organic waste generated in the City. The City’s annual recovered organic waste product (ROWP) procurement target is 8,244 tons.
Currently, the City participates in the San Mateo Resource Conservation District’s (SMRCD) Compost Broker Program (Program) which is a collaboration between the SMRCD, every city and town within San Mateo County, and the County of San Mateo to help jurisdictions meet the SB 1383 ROWP procurement target. Through the Program, the SMRCD functions as the City’s direct service provider procuring and distributing compost to farm and rangeland to assist in reaching the City’s ROWP procurement target.
The Program has been recognized by CalRecycle, the California Resource Recovery Association, and the U.S. Composting Council as a first-of-its-kind public-private partnership that both advances SB 1383 procurement goals and improves the health and resiliency of California’s working lands.
While an important part of meeting the City’s annual target, the current Program secures only 13% of the requirement.
The City meets the remainder of its annual ROWP target through additional agreements between the City and multiple other resource conservation districts (RCDs) in the state, including RCDs in Monterey, Santa Cruz, Placer, and Tuolumne Counties. The revised Program implemented by this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is intended to allow the City to meet a higher percentage of the City‘s procurement target at a much lower cost.
Using administrative efficiencies, partnerships with other regional Resource Conservation Districts, and economies of scale, the County proposes to, over time, lower the compost procurement costs from what the City currently pays for compost from $75-$78/ton to perhaps as low as $42-$46/ton. 37 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
The current Program will conclude in 2026 unless a new agreement is adopted. To continue, the County proposes a new MOU structure. Under this agreement, the City will provide an annual contribution and receive procurement credit in proportion to its participation. Starting in 2026, the County will administer the Program, including overseeing the agreement with the SMRCD, contract management, billing, record keeping, and reporting. This arrangement reduces administrative burden for the City, lowers costs significantly, and strengthens regional collaboration while supporting the City‘s SB 1383 obligations.
The City’s contribution for calendar year 2026 is $300,000. Of the City’s annual contribution, 96-98% of the funding will support activities that help meet the City’s annual procurement target and 2-4% will cover the County’s administrative costs, though administrative costs may be increased above 4% after the first year of implementation based on the total staff time required to administer the Program. Once the MOU is executed, the City may annually renew the MOU under the same terms and conditions, which staff recommends for the City Manager to be given authority to execute.
Contribution amounts for each subsequent Program year will be subject to City Council approval. The MOU may be ended by either party with 30 days written notice.
While the County administers the program, the City remains responsible for meeting the total procurement target. In September of each year, the County will provide to the City the anticipated tons of ROWP procurement credit to be received in the calendar year following, which will allow the City to plan for how much ROWP procurement credit will need to be met beyond the Program’s support. Participation offers significant advantages by reducing duplicative effort, ensuring consistent reporting, and leveraging economies of scale to lower costs.
Participation in the current Program has been very successful in assisting the City in meeting the SB 1383 requirements.
Staff has participated in the development of the Program and advocated for the County to take on the role outlined in the MOU.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The City can self-determine its annual funding contribution to the Program and will receive a ROWP procurement credit proportional to its financial contribution. To fund calendar year 2026, the County will invoice the City for an initial contribution of $300,000. Of the total invoiced amount, the County will retain between 2% and 4% of the total amount to offset staff time costs required to administer the Program. The percentage of funding retained for County administrative costs will be adjusted in future years based on the total staff time required to administer this Program. There are sufficient funds in the Solid Waste Program’s annual FY 2025-26 budget for this initial contribution.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
Approval of the MOU between the City of San Mateo and the County of San Mateo to establish a SB 1383 compliant procurement program is not a project subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), because it can be seen with certainty that it will not cause a physical change in the environment. (Public Resources Code Section 21065.)
NOTICE PROVIDED
All meeting noticing requirements were met.
ATTACHMENTS
Att 1 – Memorandum of Understanding
STAFF CONTACT
Jack Johnson, Waste Management Supervisor
[email protected]
6505227346
38 of 1110
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN MATEO AND THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A SENATE BILL (SB) 1383 COMPLIANT PROCUREMENT
PROGRAM
THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU), entered into on this 31st day of January 2026, by and between the County of San Mateo, hereinafter called "the County" and the City of San Mateo, hereinafter called "the Jurisdiction";
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the State of California enacted Senate Bill (SB) 1383 (Chapter 395, Statutes of 2016), which required the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) to adopt regulations to reduce organic waste disposal by 75 percent by 2025; and WHEREAS, the SB 1383 regulations (Title 14, Division 7, Chapter 12, Article 12 of the California Code of Regulations) require jurisdictions to procure recovered organic waste products (ROWPs) to meet annual targets set by CalRecycle; and
WHEREAS, in 2021, the Jurisdiction, the County, and the San Mateo Resource Conservation District (RCD) launched a program to comply with SB 1383 requirements (Program), which between 2021 and 2024 procured and applied 21,000 tons of cost-reduced compost for local farms and rangelands, contributing to countywide procurement targets; and WHEREAS, the Program will conclude in 2026 unless a new agreement is established; and WHEREAS, all parties have recognized the value of continuing the Program to support SB 1383 compliance, leverage prior CalRecycle SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant investments and advance progress toward procurement targets; and
WHEREAS, the Jurisdiction shall determine its annual funding contribution to the Program and shall receive procurement credit in proportion to its contribution; and WHEREAS, the County has agreed to administer the Program on the Jurisdiction’s behalf to reduce collective staff time, duplicative administrative burdens and costs in exchange for an administrative fee; and
WHEREAS, the Jurisdiction will remain ultimately responsible for meeting its annual ROWP procurement targets.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED BY THE PARTIES HERETO AS FOLLOWS:
1. Services to be Performed by the County
A. Program Administration
a. The County shall serve as Program administrator, overseeing the agreement with the RCD to ensure coordination and successful implementation of the Program, in 39 of 1110
accordance with SB 1383 requirements. In this role, the County shall provide contract management, fiscal oversight, and coordination with participating jurisdictions. b. The County shall serve as the direct service provider and allocate procurement credits in proportion to the Jurisdiction’s contribution to the Program. c. The County shall execute an intergovernmental agreement with the RCD by February 28, 2026, to implement the Program and shall maintain the agreement for the duration of this MOU.
B. Program Funding
a. The County shall invoice the Jurisdiction for an initial contribution, set by the Jurisdiction, for an amount not to exceed $300,000, by February 28, 2026. The initial contribution will fund the Program for calendar year 2026. Invoices may be issued after this date or divided into multiple billings if necessary to align with the Jurisdiction’s fiscal schedule. Of the total invoiced amount, the County will retain between 2% and 4% of the total amount to offset staff time costs required to administer the Program. The County will track all administrative costs associated with the Program and will furnish data to the Jurisdiction justifying the final administrative rate that will be retained. The rate will not exceed 4% in the first year of implementation. The percentage of funding retained for County administrative costs will be adjusted in future years based on the total staff time required to administer this Program.
b. The County shall provide a Program Authorization Letter Template to the Jurisdiction, by September 1, 2026, and annually thereafter, for use in authorizing its continued participation in the Program for the next calendar year. In this letter, the Jurisdiction shall specify its total contribution, the anticipated tons of ROWP credit to be received, and the percent of its contribution that the County will retain to offset Program administration costs. The letter shall be signed by an employee of the Jurisdiction who is authorized to commit and disburse funding to the Program.
c. The County shall invoice the Jurisdiction for its contribution to the Program as defined in the Authorization Letter no later than January 30, 2027, and annually thereafter. If no authorization letter is provided for a given calendar year, the County shall not invoice the Jurisdiction.
d. The County shall carry forward any unspent Program contribution for the Jurisdiction’s future use in the Program.
e. Upon termination of this MOU, the County shall return any unspent contributions to the Jurisdiction within sixty (60) days.
C. Recordkeeping & Reporting
a. The County shall provide the Jurisdiction with access to an online database containing all information related to Program activities, in compliance with SB 1383 recordkeeping and 40 of 1110
reporting requirements. The database shall clearly identify the ROWP procurement completed by the County on the Jurisdiction’s behalf under this MOU. b. The County shall provide the Jurisdiction with the information necessary to report procurement activities in its Electronic Annual Report (EAR) to CalRecycle. This information shall be provided no later than June 1 of each year. c. The County shall provide the Jurisdiction with written status reports twice per year on all Program activities.
D. Additional Work
a. With written approval, the County may invoice the Jurisdiction for supplemental contributions to the Program, to increase the Jurisdiction’s procurement credit. Such approval shall specify the total funding amount and the portion allocated to Program activities and County administrative costs. Jurisdictions are not obliged to support additional work. A Jurisdiction choosing not to support additional work shall not be grounds for terminating this MOU. The Jurisdiction is not guaranteed any benefit from additional work for which it does not contribute.
b. With written approval, the County may invoice the Jurisdiction for contributions to additional projects or agreements undertaken on the Jurisdiction’s behalf to increase procurement credit or reduce the Jurisdiction’s procurement target set by CalRecycle.
Such approval shall specify the total funding amount and the portion allocated to Program activities and County administrative costs.
2. Tasks to be Completed by the Jurisdiction
A. The Jurisdiction shall pay in full all invoices submitted by the County within forty-five (45) days of receipt.
B. The Jurisdiction shall provide the Authorization Letter to the County by November 1, 2026, and annually thereafter, to authorize its continued participation in the Program for the upcoming calendar year. The letter shall specify the total contribution, the anticipated tons of ROWP credit to be received, and the percentage of its contribution that the County will retain to offset Program administration costs.
C. The Jurisdiction may authorize participation in the Program for one (1) year or for multiple consecutive calendar years, with mutual agreement from the County. A multi-year authorization shall specify the total annual contribution amount for each year covered and shall remain subject to annual adjustment of the County’s administrative cost percentage. The Jurisdiction may revise or rescind its authorization for any future year by providing written notice to the County no later than November 1 preceding the year for which the change is requested.
D. The Jurisdiction shall be responsible for completing and submitting its EAR to CalRecycle, reporting the information provided by the County.
41 of 1110
E. The Jurisdiction shall pay any additional invoices it has approved in writing, within forty-five (45) days of receipt, for supplemental contributions to the Program or for additional projects and agreements undertaken by the County on the Jurisdiction’s behalf.
3. Consideration
This MOU enables the continuation of the collaborative Program, jointly developed by the Jurisdiction, County, and RCD since 2021. By participating in this MOU, the Jurisdiction avoids the administrative and financial burden of creating and managing a separate contract or Program and allocating staff time, allowing the County on behalf of all the cities in San Mateo County to leverage economies of scale to reduce countywide SB 1383 procurement compliance costs.
In return, the Jurisdiction contributes funding to the Program and receives procurement credit in proportion to its contribution. This Program advances shared countywide goals by strengthening local food system resiliency, improving soil health, reducing climate impacts, and supporting long-term economic and environmental benefits across San Mateo County.
4. Relationship of Parties
It is expressly understood that this is an agreement between independent entities, the County and the Jurisdiction, and that no individual agency, employee, partnership, joint venture, or other relationship is established by this MOU. The intent of both the County and the Jurisdiction is to create an independent collaborative relationship.
5. Hold Harmless
A. It is agreed that the County shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify Jurisdiction and its officers, employees, agents, and servants from any and all claims, suits, or actions of every name, kind, and description brought by a third party which arise out of the terms and conditions of this MOU and which result from the acts or omissions of the County and/or its officers, employees, agents, and servants.
B. It is agreed that Jurisdiction shall defend, save, hold harmless, and indemnify the County and its officers, employees, agents, and servants from any and all claims, suits, or actions of every name, kind, and description brought by a third party which arise out of the terms and conditions of this MOU and which result from the acts or omissions of Jurisdiction and/or their respective officers, employees, agents and servants.
C. County shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify Jurisdiction from and against any and all claims for wages, salaries, benefits, taxes, and all other withholdings and charges payable to, or in respect to, County’s representatives for services provided under this MOU.
D. Jurisdiction shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify County from and against any and all claims for wages, salaries, benefits, taxes, and all other withholdings and charges payable to, or in respect to, Jurisdiction’s representatives for services provided under this MOU.
E. The duty of each party to defend, hold harmless, and indemnify the other as set forth herein shall include the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code. 42 of 1110
F. In the event of concurrent negligence (or intentional/reckless acts) of Jurisdiction and/or their respective officers and employees, on the one hand, and the County and/or its officers, employees, agents, and servants, on the other hand, then the liability for any and all claims for injuries or damage to persons and/or property which arise out of the terms and conditions of this MOU shall be apportioned according to the California theory of comparative fault.
6. Amendment of MOU and Merger Clause
This MOU constitutes the sole MOU of the parties hereto and correctly states the rights, duties, and obligations of each party as of this document's date. In the event that any term, condition, provision, requirement or specification set forth in the body of this MOU conflicts with or is inconsistent with any term, condition, provision, requirement, or specification in any exhibit and/or attachment to this MOU, the provisions of this body of the MOU shall prevail. Any prior MOU, promises, negotiations, or representations between the parties not expressly stated in this document are not binding. Either party may request a modification to this MOU at any time. All subsequent modifications shall be in writing and will become effective when signed by all parties.
7. Records
The County shall maintain and preserve all records relating to this MOU in its possession and those of any third-party performing work related to this MOU for a period of five (5) years from the termination of this MOU.
8. Assignability
The County shall have the right to assign this MOU or any portion thereof to a third party or subcontract with a third party to perform any work required under this MOU. The County shall notify the Jurisdiction of any assignments made in advance.
9. Notices
Any written notice, request, demand, or other communication required or permitted hereunder shall be deemed to be properly given when deposited with the United States Postal Service, postage prepaid, or when transmitted by email communication, addressed:
In the case of the County, to:
Jasneet W. Sharma, Director
County of San Mateo Sustainability Department
455 County Center, 4th Floor
Redwood City, CA 94063
Email: [email protected]
In the case of the City of San Mateo, to:
Jack Johnson, Waste Management Supervisor
43 of 1110
330 W. 20th St.
44 of 1110
San Mateo, CA 94403
[email protected]
10. Controlling Law and Venue
The validity of this MOU, the interpretation of its terms and conditions, and the performance of the parties hereto shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Any action brought to enforce this MOU must be brought in the Superior Court of California in and for the County of San Mateo.
11. Term and Termination
Subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of the MOU, the term of this MOU shall commence on January 31, 2026, and shall be renewed, with written approval by the Jurisdiction, annually under the same terms and conditions. This MOU may be terminated without cause by the Jurisdiction or the County at any time upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other party.
12. Electronic Signatures
Both County and the Jurisdiction wish to permit this MOU and future documents relating to this MOU to be digitally signed in accordance with California law and County’s Electronic Signature Administrative Memo. Any party to this MOU may revoke such agreement to permit electronic signatures at any time in relation to all future documents by providing notice pursuant to this Agreement.
13. Authority
The parties warrant that the signatories to the MOU have the authority to bind their respective entities.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, by their duly authorized representatives, have affixed their hands.
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
By:____________________________ Date: __________________________ Jasneet W. Sharma
Director, Sustainability Department
CITY OF SAN MATEO
By:____________________________ Date: __________________________ Alex Khojikian
City Manager
45 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Agenda Report
City Hall
330 W. 20th Avenue
San Mateo CA 94403
www.cityofsanmateo.org
Agenda Number: 8 Section Name: CONSENT CALENDAR Account Number: 72-4671- 05-5281
File ID: 25-10739
TO: City Council
FROM: Alex Khojikian, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Public Works Department
MEETING DATE: January 26, 2026
SUBJECT:
Underground Flow Equalization System Odor Control System Temporary Rental — Change Order RECOMMENDATION:
Approve an increase to the rental agreement with PureAir Filtration for the Underground Flow Equalization System (UFES) temporary odor control system rental in the amount of $22,000, for a total amount not to exceed $120,000; and authorize the Public Works Director to execute the change order in substantially the form presented.
BACKGROUND:
The Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) oversees the operation of UFES, which is a critical component in San Mateo’s storm water and sewer system management plan to prevent sanitary sewer overflows along the Delaware corridor. To meet air quality emissions permit requirements during operation, the UFES facility is required to process air and gases through a foul air (FA) fume scrubber at all times.
Due to damage to the existing FA system, the UFES facility could not be operated as constructed. A rental FA system was procured and installed in early November. The existing UFES FA system is manufactured by PureAir Filtration LLC, which is also the provider of the portable rented FA system, which is the same design as the approved, installed system.
Staff recommends approving an increase to the rental agreement and authorizing the Public Works Director to execute the associated change order (Attachment 1) to keep the FA system in place until the installed system can be repaired and is functional, which is anticipated to be in late March 2026. The original rental was authorized on October 24, 2025, for an amount not to exceed $98,000. The additional funds in the amount of $22,000, for a revised budget of $120,000, will allow for the costs of the rental FA system through March 2026, and to allow for any needs beyond the quoted amount to cover any unforeseen costs such as additional work hours, mobilizations, repairs, or materials.
BUDGET IMPACT:
Sufficient funds are available in the WWTP operating budget in the Sewer Fund to cover the cost of this increase.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
This change order is categorically exempt from CEQA as an “existing facility,” because it consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15301.)
NOTICE PROVIDED
All meeting noticing requirements were met.
46 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
ATTACHMENTS
Att 1 – Finance Change Order #1
STAFF CONTACT
Robert Learmonth, Wastewater Treatment Plant Manager
[email protected]
650-522-7386
47 of 1110
https://cityofsanmateoorg-my.sharepoint.com/personal/jperez_cityofsanmateo_org/Documents/Finance/Procurement/Templates/Finance CO Prof Services 041923.doc
CITY OF SAN MATEO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
330 WEST 20TH AVENUE
SAN MATEO, CA 94403
(650) 522-7300
CHANGE ORDER #1
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
PROJECT: UFES Temporary Foul Air System Rental
TO: FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Date
AGREEMENT WITH: Pure Air Filtration
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
PO/SCON No.
DESCRIPTION OF WORK
This change order is for Finance tracking only. Refer to the following document for the description of work and agreement of price:
Summary of change:
Due to the need to rent the foul air system for a longer duration, staff recommends that the previously approved not-to-exceed payment amount of $98,000 be increased to $120,000.
Total cost of change not to exceed: $ 22,000
STATEMENT OF ACCOUNT
Original Contract Price $ 98,000 Date Approved:
Previous Change Orders $ 0
Total to Date $ 98,000 By:
This Change Order $ 22,000 MATTHEW FABRY, Director of Public Works Revised Contract Price $120,000
DISTRIBUTION: Finance NOTE: This change order is not effective until approved by the Director of Public Works.
SCON-0001235
48 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Agenda Report
City Hall
330 W. 20th Avenue
San Mateo CA 94403
www.cityofsanmateo.org
Agenda Number: 9 Section Name: CONSENT CALENDAR Account Number: 10-4691 File ID: 25-10769 TO: City Council
FROM: Alex Khojikian, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Public Works Department
MEETING DATE: January 26, 2026
SUBJECT:
Transportation Staffing Restructuring – Adoption
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution to add an additional Engineering Manager position and reallocate an Engineering Technician II position to an Assistant/Associate Transportation Planner position.
BACKGROUND:
Staff is proposing to restructure the Transportation Division to add capacity and flexibility in the Traffic Engineering, Transportation Planning, Land Development, Utility, and Right-of-Way Sections of the Public Works Department. This will allow staff to better deliver on two of Council’s priority initiatives in the recently adopted Strategic Plan, namely the Transportation and Housing initiatives. In general, the restructuring would split the existing Transportation Division in two, creating a Transportation Division and a Development Services Division, with the former generally focused on transportation issues and the latter generally focused on development issues. Council is asked to approve a new Engineering Manager position and reallocate a vacant Engineering Technician II position to a new Assistant/Associate Transportation Planner to support the restructuring.
Basis for Recommendation
Transportation planning and development review are central to the City’s ability to implement adopted policies, deliver capital projects, manage growth, and maintain day-to-day mobility and parking operations. Considering the scope and complexity of the City’s transportation responsibilities, the increasing pace of development and implementation driven by voter-approved and state-mandated requirements, and the staffing considerations necessary to support timely, coordinated, and effective service delivery, a restructuring is necessary to better align staffing resources with adopted priorities and evolving service demands.
Across the Active Transportation, Safety, Vehicle Congestion Management, and Parking Management categories of the 2040 General Plan Circulation Element, the City has adopted more than 26 transportation-related policies. These policies, together with the City Strategic Plan’s Transportation priority initiative and multiple City Council FY 25-26 priorities focused on transportation, reflect a commitment to advancing a safe, efficient, and well-functioning transportation system. The City has also adopted multiple transportation plans that define an ambitious vision for safety and mobility, and in recent years has shifted its focus from planning to implementation, including projects such as the Delaware Safe Routes to School Project and the 3rd and Norfolk Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Project.
The Transportation Planning section also plays a critical role in delivering and managing the City’s parking programs. Their efforts include customer service, data collection and analysis, consultant and contract oversight, and management of residential, downtown, and citywide parking systems. This work is essential to the City’s day-to-day operations, supporting effective management of parking in neighborhoods and businesses, maintaining orderly use of the public right-of-way, and 49 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
ensuring continued parking revenue collection, tracking, and forecasting.
Land development review plays a critical role in ensuring that new projects are implemented safely, efficiently, and in alignment with adopted City policies and standards. Recent housing accountability and streamlining requirements constrain local discretionary ability and increase review demands for private development. Measure T has resulted in a significant increase in development applications. AB 130 and SB 330 are accelerating housing project review timelines and requiring staff to process applications, prepare reports, and coordinate reviews (including evaluating transportation impacts) more quickly to meet state-mandated timeframes.
The City’s ability to deliver on these adopted priorities and timelines is increasingly constrained by limited staff capacity.
The proposed restructuring will help align staff resources with existing commitments, strengthen implementation of transportation projects and land development review, and directly support City Council direction and community priorities.
Proposed Restructuring
The Transportation Division currently consists of 16.5 full-time equivalent (FTE) staff, including the Engineering Manager (1.0 FTE) that oversees the division and the Traffic Engineering (5.0 FTE), Transportation Planning (2.5 FTE, all currently vacant), and Land Development, Utility, and Right-of-Way (8.0 FTE) Sections. The first two of these sections are primarily focused on the City’s management of the roadway system, including planning and policy development, multimodal network planning, traffic operations and signal coordination, speed management and traffic calming, transportation impact mitigation for development projects, construction traffic management, parking management, public outreach, safe routes to school program implementation, and interagency coordination. The latter section is primarily focused on the interface between private development and third parties and the public right-of-way and includes the Public Worksfocused aspects of reviewing private development applications, oversight and permitting of third-party utilities (including small wireless facilities) within the public right-of-way, and issuance of encroachment permits for events or work within the right-of-way.
Following the proposed restructure, the Transportation Division would split into two divisions – a Transportation Division which includes Traffic Engineering and Transportation Planning, and a Development Services Division which includes Land Development, Utility, and Right-of-Way. This restructuring requires approval of a new Engineering Manager position that would oversee the Development Services Division, with the existing Engineering Manager position overseeing the Transportation Division. In addition, a vacant Engineering Technician role within the Land Development, Utility, and Rightof-Way section would be reallocated to create a second Assistant/Associate Transportation Planner position within the Transportation Planning section. With Council’s January 12, 2026, approval to revise the Principal Transportation Planner classification to a Senior/Principal Transportation Planner, this restructuring would revise the Transportation Planning section to consist of two Assistant/Associate Transportation Planners and a Senior/Principal Transportation Planner.
A dedicated Transportation Engineering Manager and a revised Transportation Planning section will allow staff to better deliver on Council’s transportation priorities discussed above. Replacing the current structure (Engineering Technician and part-time per-diem Safe Routes to School Coordinator) with a second Assistant/Associate Transportation Planner position consolidates responsibilities into full-time roles capable of independently managing programs and project delivery. This structure improves overall capacity and responsiveness while providing flexibility for workload balancing, mentoring, and long-term program continuity. Listed below are the primary efforts advanced by the Transportation Planning section.
Planning Efforts
• Complete Streets Plan
• Parking and Transportation Planning Policy Development and Evaluation (Parking, Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Management, Vehicle Miles Traveled) • City Transportation Planning Representation (SamTrans, San Mateo County Safe Routes to School Program, C/CAG) • Transportation Grant Identification and Development
• Micromobility and Shared Mobility Policy and Program Development • Transportation planning items for the Development Review Board, Sustainability and Infrastructure Commission, 50 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
and City Council
• Multimodal transportation system planning and network development • Update of transportation-related impact fees
Safe Routes to School
• Strategic Plan implementation
• Capacity-building and City support of school district initiatives • Support for identifying quick build improvements near schools • Bike Rodeo event support
• Distribution of safety equipment, including bike locks and helmets and lighted stop paddles, through school partners
Parking Programs
• Customer service for parking programs (Downtown, Residential, and Citywide) • Oversight of parking consultants and contracts
• Parking counts/study/analysis
• Residential Parking Permit Program (RPPP) program management and permitting • Downtown parking analysis and data collection
• Maintain Downtown parking occupancy systems and ensure data is accurate and available to the public • Curb marking requests
• Assist with parking policy evaluation and development • Curb management program, including evaluation of loading zones and trash management practices • Track and apply for grants related to parking programs • Bicycle parking infrastructure
• Parking Revenue Allocation/Forecast
Capital Project Delivery
These are primarily delivered by the Traffic section, but are supported, especially when it comes to planning, outreach, and engagement, by the Transportation Planning section.
• 19th Avenue/Fashion Island Multimodal Improvement Project • Peninsula Avenue Complete Streets Multimodal Project
• Citywide Traffic Calming Program
• 28th Avenue Gap Closure
• Hillsdale/Alameda De Las Pulgas Signal
• Bike San Mateo Program
• Quick Build Mobility Program
• Hillsdale High School/31st Avenue Pedestrian Safety Improvement Project A dedicated Development Services Engineering Manager offers the following benefits to the City’s current level of service:
• Maintain timely and predictable reviews despite the growing volume of permit applications. • Provide consistent oversight and quality control to ensure adherence to standards as permitting processes and regulatory requirements continue to evolve.
• Foster proactive compliance among staff and external stakeholders. • Strengthen coordination across departments, developers, utility providers, contractors, and other permit applicants, to support efficient project delivery.
• Expand capacity to provide clear, responsive communication to developers, contractors, and other interested stakeholders.
• Expand ability to support regional coordination by engaging with local and regional partners to stay informed about evolving requirements and promote alignment and collaboration across municipalities. • Support the development of a Comprehensive Construction Management Plan for Measure T, which would establish a consistent Citywide framework for managing cumulative impacts from simultaneous construction 51 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
impacts associated with increased development activity, and encouraging coordination amongst developers.
Based on the above, staff recommends Council adopt the attached Resolution to add an additional Engineering Manager position and reallocate an Engineering Technician II position to establish an additional Assistant/Associate Transportation Planner position.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The expected impact of this change on the General Fund is $81,000 annually. Any budget necessary to fill positions in the current fiscal year will be absorbed within the department’s operating budget and savings from departmental vacancies.
Budget to fund these positions in future fiscal years will be requested as part of the annual budget development process.
This budget impact assumes no chargebacks to capital or private development projects. It is forecasted that a minimum of 50% of this amount will be charged annually to capital or private development projects. If the City pursues greater cost recovery for its parking programs in the future, the net impact to the General Fund could decrease further, as one of the Assistant/Associate Transportation’s primary roles is support of the City’s parking programs.
The following assumptions were made to estimate the budget impact:
• The new Engineering Manager (1.0 FTE) and Assistant/Associate Transportation Planner (1.0 FTE) positions are conservatively set at top step (step 5). The Principal Transportation Planner will be underfilled by a Senior Transportation Planner. As a result, the actual costs for these positions may be less than budgeted. • The Engineering Technician II (1.0 FTE) position is being reallocated to establish the second Assistant/Associate Transportation Planner position. Salary savings from eliminating the per-diem Safe Routes to School Coordinator position will help to offset the increased costs of the reallocation.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
The creation or reallocation of positions is not a project subject to CEQA, because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).)
NOTICE PROVIDED
All meeting noticing requirements were met.
ATTACHMENTS
Att 1 – Proposed Resolution
STAFF CONTACT
Katherine Sheehan, Deputy Director
[email protected]
(650) 522-7303
52 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
RESOLUTION NO. (2026)
AUTHORIZING THE CREATION OF AN ENGINEERING MANAGER POSITION AND REALLOCATION OF AN
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN II TO AN ASSISTANT/ASSOCIATE TRANSPORTATION PLANNER POSITION IN THE
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
WHEREAS, staff propose a Transportation Division Restructuring to add capacity and flexibility in support of both the transportation and land development sections of the Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, staff propose the addition of an Engineering Manager role to address the growing complexity and volume of land development and permitting activities and address workload demands within the Transportation Division; and
WHEREAS, staff proposes reallocating a vacant Engineering Technician II position to an Assistant/Associate Transportation Planner position to improve transportation section capacity and responsiveness while providing flexibility for workload balancing, mentoring, and long-term program continuity; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the San Mateo Municipal Code Section 2.57.030(d), approval of new classifications and related job specifications, salary schedules, compensation changes, elimination or reinstatement of positions, reallocation of positions, reclassifications, and revisions of job specifications must be approved by City Council; and
WHEREAS, the employee associations representing the impacted classifications have been informed of the proposed changes and have not brought forth any objections or concerns; and WHEREAS, additional annual costs (estimated to be $81,000) to the General Fund for the position creation and reallocation will be initially funded from department vacancies.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that:
1. The creation or reclassification of positions is not a project subject to CEQA, because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).)
2. The creation of a 1.00 full-time equivalent (FTE) Engineering Manager is approved.
3. The reallocation of a 1.00 FTE vacant Engineering Technician II to 1.00 FTE Assistant/Associate Transportation Planner is approved.
53 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Agenda Report
City Hall
330 W. 20th Avenue
San Mateo CA 94403
www.cityofsanmateo.org
Agenda Number: 10 Section Name: CONSENT CALENDAR Account Number: 72-4671 File ID: 25-10771 TO: City Council
FROM: Alex Khojikian, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Public Works Department
MEETING DATE: January 26, 2026
SUBJECT:
Wastewater Treatment Plant On-Call Consulting Services — Amendment RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Amendment No. 4 to the Professional Consultant Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers, Inc. for Wastewater Treatment Plant on-call consulting services in the amount of $250,000, for a new not-to-exceed amount of $1,675,000; and authorize the Public Works Director to execute the amendment in substantially the form presented.
BACKGROUND:
The City is currently under a Regional Water Quality Control Board Cease-and-Desist Order requiring improvements to its sewer collection system and Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows and unauthorized discharges of untreated or partially treated wastewater to San Francisco Bay. The Clean Water Program (CWP) includes several capital improvements that are currently under construction and intended to comply with the Cease-and-Desist Order.
As part of the CWP, the City has identified capital improvements needed to maintain and/or improve the WWTP reliability, performance, and safety (Projects). The agreements for on-call professional services provide support for the Projects and maintenance and improvement projects implemented through the WWTP’s Operations and Maintenance groups. The required on-call professional services include, but are not limited to, alternatives analyses and engineering studies, design services, bid period services, engineering services during construction, and operational support.
On August 15, 2022, City Council approved agreements with two consulting firms; Carollo Engineers, Inc. (Carollo) and Brown and Caldwell, to provide professional consulting services in support of the City’s planned rehabilitation of the existing WWTP. Each agreement authorized a total of up to $400,000 for services performed on an on-call basis. The agreement terms are three years, with the option for two additional one-year extensions and an additional budget of up to $100,000 for each year extended. A summary of Carollo’s Task Order history and current status is provided below:
1. Carollo was awarded Task 1 – 3 Water Pumping Improvements and Task 1A – Ferric Chloride to Combined Sludge under the agreement.
2. On August 5, 2024, City Council approved Amendment No. 1 to the agreement, increasing the amount by $450,000 for a revised total agreement amount of $850,000. Carollo was awarded Task 1B - Engineering Services for Spent Backwash Pumps and Ferric Chloride Day Tank and Transfer Pump, Task 1C – Additional Potholing, and Task 2 - WAS Thickening Alternatives Analysis Project.
3. On June 25, 2025, City Council approved Amendment No. 2 to increase the agreement amount by $475,000 for a revised total agreement amount of $1,325,000. Carollo was awarded Task Order 3 - Dewatering System Centrifuges 1 and 2 Replacement Project. On August 31, 2025, the first one-year extension option was exercised through Amendment No. 3 to the agreement, increasing compensation by $100,000, for a new revised agreement 54 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
total of $1,425,000.
In December 2025, the 3-Water Pumping and Ferric Chloride to Combined Sludge Line Project was awarded for construction. Carollo will provide engineering services during construction for this phase. For Carollo to provide engineering services for these tasks, an increase of $250,000 to the on-call agreement is recommended to complete this work and address any potential unforeseen issues in the project. This would result in the revised total agreement amount of $1,675,000.
BUDGET IMPACT:
There are sufficient funds available in the CWP WWTP Annual Major Components Project (46t090) budget.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
The proposed action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), since entering on-call professional services agreements is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect significant physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).) In addition, on June 6, 2016, the City Council certified a Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (Final PEIR) (SCH No. 2015032006), which serves as the primary environmental compliance document for implementation of the Clean Water Program. On July 16, 2018, the City approved Addendum 1 to the Final PEIR, and on April 15, 2019, approved Addendum 2. Any resultant capital improvement or operations and maintenance-related projects resulting from the on-call professional consulting services shall be reviewed on an individual basis or evaluated for consistency with the PEIR and Addenda.
NOTICE PROVIDED
All meeting noticing requirements were met.
ATTACHMENTS
Att 1 – Amendment No. 4
STAFF CONTACT
Thomas Ruark, Senior Project Manager
[email protected]
650-522-7280
Thomas W. Williams, Engineering Manager
[email protected]
(650) 522-7307
James O'Connell, Deputy Director of Public Works
[email protected]
650-522-7304
55 of 1110
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN MATEO AND CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC.
FOR PROFEESIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT ON-CALL
CONSULTING SERVICES
($400,000 [Original Amount], $450,000 [Amendment No. 1], $475,000 [Amendment No. 2], $100,000 [Amendment No. 3], $250,000 [Amendment No. 4]) This Amendment entered into this day of ____________, by and between the City of San Mateo, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of California (“CITY”), and Carollo Engineers, Inc. (“CONSULTANT”).
WHEREAS, on September 2, 2022, CITY and CONSULTANT entered into an Agreement for professional consultant services (“Agreement”) for a total of $400,000 for services to be performed an on-call basis; and
WHEREAS, on October 25, 2024, CITY and CONSULTANT executed Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement to amend the points of contact and to increase the Agreement amount by $450,000, for a revised not-to-exceed total of $850,000; and
WHEREAS, on June 25, 2025, CITY and CONSULTANT executed Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement to increase the Agreement amount by $475,000, for a revised not-to-exceed total of $1,325,000; and
WHEREAS, on August 15, 2025, CITY and CONSULTANT exercised the first one-year option to extend the term of the Agreement to August 31, 2026, and increase the compensation by $100,000, for a revised not-to-exceed total of $1,425,000; and
WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT wish to execute Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement to increase the Agreement amount by $250,000, for a revised not-to-exceed total of $1,675,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. The first paragraph of Section 8, “Payment”, of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:
“Payment shall be made by the CITY only for services rendered and upon submission of a payment request upon completion and CITY approval of the work performed. In consideration for the full performances of the services and any reimbursable expenses set forth in this Agreement, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a fee based on verified time and materials not to exceed $1,675,000 without prior written authorization. Requests for payments shall be itemized and correspond to the various items of work described in Exhibit A and shall be based on the rate and cost schedule set forth in Exhibit B.”
2. The remaining terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
56 of 1110
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY OF SAN MATEO and CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC, have executed this Amendment No. 4 on _______________________.
CITY OF SAN MATEO CONSULTANT
Matt Fabry
Public Works Director
Date Rick Chan
Its Authorized Agent
Senior Vice President
If a Corporation, can be either 1)
President or 2) Vice President plus
an additional corporate officer
(i.e., Secretary, Treasurer) who
shall sign below.
Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM ADDITIONAL CORPORATE
OFFICER
(if necessary per the above)
Linh P. Nguyen
Assistant City Attorney
Date Michael Barnes
Corporate Secretary
Date
57 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Agenda Report
City Hall
330 W. 20th Avenue
San Mateo CA 94403
www.cityofsanmateo.org
Agenda Number: 11 Section Name: CONSENT CALENDAR Account Number: 72-4671 File ID: 25-10772 TO: City Council
FROM: Alex Khojikian, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Public Works Department
MEETING DATE: January 26, 2026
SUBJECT:
Wastewater Treatment Plant Immediate Action Projects Package III — Agreement RECOMMENDATION:
Award a professional services agreement to HDR Engineering, Inc. to provide Engineering Services During Construction (Phase 3) for Immediate Action Projects Package-III in an amount not to exceed $332,916; establish a contingency reserve of $50,000; and authorize the Public Works Director to execute the agreement in the substantially the form presented and approve any necessary change orders within the approved contingency amount.
BACKGROUND:
The City is currently under a Regional Water Quality Control Board Cease and Desist Order requiring improvements to its sewer collection system and Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) to eliminate sanitary sewer overflows and unauthorized discharges of untreated or partially treated wastewater to San Francisco Bay. The Clean Water Program (CWP) includes several capital improvements that are currently under construction and intended to comply with the Cease-and-Desist Order.
The Wastewater Treatment Plant Immediate Action Projects Package III (IAP-III) Project is a component of the CWP and includes improvements to the Wastewater Treatment Plant’s (WWTP) effluent pump station, site waste pump station, and plant-wide mechanical and electrical equipment, as well as replacement of effluent flowmeters and sludge heating and recirculation piping. The project is part of the CWP’s efforts to modernize the existing WWTP and maintain safe and reliable operations.
IAP-III engineering services were planned to be executed in three phases: Phase 1 - Project Analyses, Phase 2 - Detailed Design and Bid Phase Services, and Phase 3 - Engineering Services during Construction.
On September 16, 2019, City Council awarded a professional services agreement to HDR Engineering, Inc. (HDR) to provide design and engineering services for the IAP-III project. However, due to challenges with the project, an oversight was made where the agreement with HDR lapsed. Therefore, a new agreement with HDR needs to be executed to complete the IAP-III project. Below is a detailed timeline of the agreement and amendments with HDR and its current status:
1. On September 16, 2019, Council awarded the professional services agreement to HDR to proceed with Phase 1 - Project Analyses for an amount of $217,932.
2. On October 19, 2020, City Council approved Amendment No. 1 for HDR to complete Phase 2 – Detailed Design for an amount of $801,563. The total contract amount was $1,019,495. During Phase 2, the City issued two more amendments to include scope for additional improvements and to optimize coordination with the larger WWTP Upgrade & Expansion project, which is already under construction. Both Amendments No. 2 and 3 were no-cost58 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
increase amendments as HDR estimated they could complete the additional scope within the existing contract amount.
3. In April 2022, the IAP-III Project was advertised for competitive bids, with only a single bid submitted that was significantly higher than HDR's engineering estimate. On June 20, 2022, City Council adopted a resolution to reject the bid and authorize staff to negotiate with the bidder. A contingency-funded Amendment No. 4 was executed for HDR to provide support during negotiations, update the design as needed, and support the bid phase for a second time for an amount of $80,000. The total contract amount was $1,099,495. In February 2023, the revised contract documents were advertised and on May 15, 2023, the construction contract was awarded to the responsive low bidder.
4. On 28 June 2023, City Council approved Amendment No. 5 for HDR to complete Phase 3 - Engineering Services during Construction for services for an amount of $422,000. The project term was scheduled to be completed by April 30, 2025. At this time, the cumulative agreement total was $1,521,495 and contingency reserve was $42,000.
Unforeseen site conditions and contractor setbacks has caused the project to be delayed. HDR’s agreement was not renewed in response to the delay in the required time frame, and the agreement expired by its terms. Due to this, the remaining project funds and contingency have expired.
For HDR to provide engineering services during construction for the remainder of the construction period (estimated to be completed in July 2026), a new agreement with an expiration of December 31, 2026, for an amount of $332,916 and contingency reserve of $50,000 is recommended to complete the project and cover any additional unforeseen issues as work progresses.
BUDGET IMPACT:
There are sufficient funds available to fund this agreement in the WWTP IAP Package III Project (46t010).
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
The proposed action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), since entering on-call professional services agreements is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect significant physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).) In addition, on June 6, 2016, the City Council certified a Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (Final PEIR) (SCH No. 2015032006), which serves as the primary environmental compliance document for implementation of the Clean Water Program. On July 16, 2018, the City approved Addendum 1 to the Final PEIR, and on April 15, 2019, Addendum 2. Any resultant capital improvement or operations and maintenance-related projects resulting from the on-call professional consulting services shall be reviewed on an individual basis or evaluated for consistency with the PEIR and Addenda.
NOTICE PROVIDED
All meeting noticing requirements were met.
ATTACHMENTS
Att 1 – Agreement
STAFF CONTACT
Thomas Ruark, Senior Project Manager
[email protected]
650-522-7280
Thomas W. Williams, Engineering Manager
[email protected]
(650) 522-7307
59 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
James O'Connell, Deputy Director of Public Works
[email protected]
650-522-7304
60 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 1 of 18
Rev 7/21
AGREEMENT WITH HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION PROJECTS PACKAGE III PROJECT
This agreement, made and entered into this day of__________ by and between the CITY OF SAN MATEO, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and HDR ENGINEERING, INC., a Nebraska corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT":
RECITALS:
A. CITY desires certain design professional services hereinafter described.
B. CITY desires to engage CONSULTANT to provide these design professional services by reason of its qualifications and experience for performing such services and CONSULTANT has offered to provide the required services on the terms and in the manner set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED as follows:
SECTION 1 - SCOPE OF PROJECT
The scope of services to be performed by CONSULTANT under this Agreement is described in Exhibit A, Scope of Services, attached and incorporated by reference.
SECTION 2 - RELIANCE UPON PROFESSIONAL SKILL OF CONSULTANT It is mutually understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that CONSULTANT is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the work agreed to be done under this Agreement and that CITY relies upon the skill of CONSULTANT to do and perform the work in the most skillful manner, and CONSULTANT agrees to thus perform the work. The acceptance of CONSULTANT's work by CITY does not operate as a release of CONSULTANT from said obligation.
SECTION 3 - PROJECT COORDINATION/STAFFING
3.1 CITY
MATTHEW FABRY, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, will be the representative of CITY for all purposes under this Agreement. THOMAS RUARK is hereby designated as the PROJECT MANAGER and shall supervise the day-today progress and execution of this Agreement.
3.2 CONSULTANT
CONSULTANT's services are unique and personal. CONSULTANT shall not assign or transfer its interest or obligation under this Agreement without the CITY's written consent. CONSULTANT shall not subcontract its duties under this Agreement without the CITY's written consent. 61 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 2 of 18
Rev 7/21
CONSULTANT shall assign a single PROJECT DIRECTOR to have overall responsibility for the progress and execution of this Agreement for CONSULTANT. MALIKA RAMANATHAN is hereby designated as the PROJECT DIRECTOR for CONSULTANT.
CONSULTANT shall assign a PROJECT COORDINATOR to represent CONSULTANT during the day-to-day work on the Project. JILLIAN DRESSLER is hereby designated as the PROJECT COORDINATOR for CONSULTANT.
CONSULTANT shall assign additional key personnel as follows:
Electrical Engineer – Gustavo Iniguez Vazquez
Electrical Engineer – Robb McComb
Electrical Engineer – Raymon Genato
Project Coordinator – Tom Hoffman
In addition, CONSULTANT is specifically authorized to subcontract with the following subconsulting firms to assist in providing the services required by this Agreement:
___________________________
___________________________
___________________________
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for employing or engaging all sub-consultants necessary for performance of the CONSULTANT’s scope of work. CONSULTANT shall manage, evaluate, and incorporate subconsultants work into the project as necessary.
All work on this project shall be accomplished by the above-named CONSULTANT's personnel and subconsultants. CONSULTANT shall not substitute personnel or subconsultants without the CITY's written consent.
SECTION 4 - INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
It is expressly agreed that in the performance of the professional services required under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall at all times be considered an independent contractor as defined in Labor Code Section 3353, under control of the CITY as to the result of the work but not the means by which the result is accomplished. Nothing herein shall be construed to make CONSULTANT an agent or employee of CITY while providing services under this Agreement.
SECTION 5 - DUTIES OF CONSULTANT
CONSULTANT's services shall be furnished as described below and as more particularly described in Exhibit A, Scope of Services. Any changes in the Scope of Services must be approved in advance, in writing, by the Public Works Director.
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of all studies, reports, designs, drawings, specifications, and other items furnished by CONSULTANT under this 62 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 3 of 18
Rev 7/21
Agreement. CONSULTANT shall, without additional compensation, correct or revise any errors or deficiencies in its studies, reports, designs, drawings, specifications, and other items.
CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to furnish the services described under this Agreement.
All documents, drawings and specifications relating the project prepared by CONSULTANT or CONSULTANT’s approved sub-consultants shall be approved, signed, and sealed by professional engineers duly registered in the State of California for each required discipline. The Contract Documents prepared by CONSULTANT shall provide for a completed project that conforms to all applicable national, state and local construction codes and ordinances, building, fire, electrical, plumbing and occupancy codes and standards.
CONSULTANT shall be responsible for employing or engaging all persons necessary to perform the services of CONSULTANT. No subconsultant of CONSULTANT will be recognized by CITY as such; rather, all subconsultants are deemed to be the agents of CONSULTANT, and CONSULTANT agrees to be responsible for their performance. CONSULTANT shall give its personal attention to the fulfillment of the provisions of this Agreement by all of its employees and subconsultants, if any, and shall keep the work under its control. If any employee or subconsultant of CONSULTANT fails or refuses to carry out the provisions of this Agreement or appears to be incompetent or to act in a disorderly or improper manner, he or she shall be discharged immediately from the work under this Agreement on demand of CITY.
CONSULTANT agrees to comply with the City’s minimum wage ordinance as codified in Municipal Code Chapter 5.92, which differs from the state minimum wage and includes a Consumer Price Index escalator.
CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with every reasonable opportunity for CITY to ascertain that the services of CONSULTANT are being performed in accordance with the requirement and intentions of this Agreement.
SECTION 6 - DUTIES OF CITY
CITY shall provide pertinent information regarding its requirements for the project.
CITY shall examine all documents submitted by CONSULTANT and shall render decisions pertaining thereto promptly to avoid unreasonable delay in the progress of CONSULTANT's work.
SECTION 7 - TERM, PROGRESS AND COMPLETION
This Agreement shall commence upon execution of the Agreement. The Parties agree that the Agreement shall be considered effective from August 1, 2025, to December 30, 2026.
SECTION 8 - PAYMENT
Payment shall be made by the CITY only for services rendered and upon submission of a payment request upon completion and CITY approval of the work performed. In consideration for the full performances of the services and any reimbursable expenses set forth in this Agreement, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a fee based on verified time and materials not to exceed $332,916.00. Requests for payments shall be itemized and correspond to the various items of work described in Exhibit A and shall be based on the rate and cost schedule set forth in Exhibit C.
63 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 4 of 18
Rev 7/21
Payment for extra work or changes in the work will not be made unless for work authorized in advance in writing by the PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR. Prior to commencing such extra work or changes, CONSULTANT and CITY shall agree upon an estimated not to exceed cost for such extra work. In no event shall CONSULTANT be paid for additional work that is necessary because of CONSULTANT's errors or oversights.
CONSULTANT shall maintain complete and accurate records as to the number of hours worked by persons and the direct costs incurred during each phase under this Agreement. All such records shall be maintained on a generally accepted accounting basis and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible.
CONSULTANT shall provide free access to such books and records to the CITY at all times, shall permit the CITY to examine and audit those books and records, shall permit the CITY to make copies of those books and records, and shall permit the CITY to inspect all work data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. All accounting records shall provide an understandable breakdown of costs charged to this Agreement. All records encompassed by this subparagraph, as well as supporting documentation, shall be kept separate from other CONSULTANT documents and records and shall be maintained by CONSULTANT for three (3) years after CONSULTANT's receipt of final payment under this Agreement.
CONSULTANT shall bill the CITY within thirty (30) days for all compensable activity on the project.
CITY shall pay CONSULTANT within thirty (30) days of receipt of billings. If CITY disagrees with any portion of a billing, the CITY shall promptly notify CONSULTANT of the disagreement, and the CITY and the CONSULTANT shall attempt to resolve the disagreement. CITY's payment of any amounts shall not constitute a waiver of any disagreement.
SECTION 9 - CHANGES IN WORK
CITY may order changes in scope or character of work, either decreasing or increasing the amount of CONSULTANT's services by amending this Agreement. In the event that such changes are ordered, CONSULTANT shall be entitled to full compensation for all work performed prior to receipt of notice of change. In no event shall CITY be liable for payment unless the amount of such extra compensation shall first have been agreed to in writing by CITY.
In the event that changes are ordered pursuant to this section, the schedule for progress and completion in Section 7 of this Agreement and compensation in Section 8 of this Agreement shall be adjusted by negotiation between CONSULTANT and CITY, subject to approval, if necessary, by the San Mateo City Council.
SECTION 10 - CONFLICT OF INTEREST
CONSULTANT understands that its professional responsibility is solely to CITY. CONSULTANT covenants that it presently has no interest, and will not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the services under this Agreement.
CONSULTANT shall not knowingly, and shall take reasonable steps to ensure that, it does not employ a person having such an interest in the performance of this Agreement. If after employment of a person, CONSULTANT discovers that it has employed a person with a direct or indirect interest that would conflict with its performance of this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall promptly sever the employment relationship. 64 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 5 of 18
Rev 7/21
SECTION 11 - TERMINATION
A. Without limitation to such rights or remedies as CITY shall otherwise have by law, CITY may, by ten days written notice to CONSULTANT, terminate this Agreement in whole or in part at any time, either for CITY'S convenience or because of the failure of CONSULTANT to fulfill its agreement obligations. Upon receipt and within ten days of such notice CONSULTANT shall:
1. Immediately discontinue all services affected (unless the notice directs otherwise); and
2. Deliver to CITY all data, documents, reports, estimates, summaries and such other information and materials as may have been accumulated by CONSULTANT in performing this Agreement, whether completed or in progress.
B. If the termination is for the convenience of CITY, CONSULTANT shall be compensated for all authorized work performed prior to notification of termination but no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit on unperformed services.
C. If, after any notice of termination for failure to fulfill agreement obligations, it is determined by a court or other arbitrator that CONSULTANT had not so failed, the termination shall be deemed to have been effected for the convenience of CITY. In such event, adjustment in the agreement price shall be made as provided in paragraph (B) of this section.
D. CONSULTANT may terminate this Agreement or suspend work on the project upon sixty (60) days written notice to CITY, but only in the event of substantial failure of performance by CITY or in the event CITY abandons or indefinitely postpones the Project.
E. Upon termination of this Agreement or suspension of work on the project by either CITY or CONSULTANT, all duties of CITY and CONSULTANT as set forth in Sections 5 and 6 herein above shall terminate.
SECTION 12 - STATUS OF REPORTS
All documents prepared by CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement, although instruments of professional service, are and shall be the property of the CITY, whether the project for which they are made is executed or not. All documents furnished to CONSULTANT by the CITY and all reports and supportive data prepared by the CONSULTANT in connection with the performance of this Agreement are the CITY's property and shall be delivered to the CITY upon the completion of CONSULTANT's services or at the CITY's written request. All reports, information, data, and exhibits prepared or assembled by CONSULTANT in connection with the performance of its services pursuant to this Agreement are confidential until released by the CITY to the public, and the CONSULTANT shall not make any of these documents or information available to any individual or organization not employed by the CONSULTANT or the CITY without the written consent of the CITY before any such release.
65 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 6 of 18
Rev 7/21
SECTION 13 - INSURANCE
CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract and three years thereafter (five years for building or major improvements) the insurance specified in Exhibit D to this Agreement.
SECTION 14 - NONASSIGNABILITY
Both parties hereto recognize that this Agreement is for the personal services of CONSULTANT and cannot be transferred, assigned, or subcontracted by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY.
SECTION 15 - INDEMNITY
CONSULTANT agrees to hold harmless and indemnify CITY and the Estero Municipal Improvement District, their elected and appointed officials, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, loss, liability, damage, and expense arising out of CONSULTANT’s negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct in the performance of its design professional services under this Agreement. To the maximum extent permitted by law and Civil Code section 2782.8, CONSULTANT agrees to defend CITY and the Estero Municipal Improvement District, their elected and appointed officials, employees, and agents against any such claims.
SECTION 16 - WAIVERS
The waiver by either party of any breach or violation of any term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement or of any provisions of any ordinance or law shall not be deemed to be a waiver of such term, covenant, condition, ordinance or law or of any subsequent breach or violation of the same or of any other term, condition, ordinance, or law. The subsequent acceptance by either party of any fee or other money which may become due hereunder shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any preceding breach or violation by the other party of any term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement or of any applicable law or ordinance.
SECTION 17 - COSTS AND ATTORNEYS FEES
Attorney fees in an amount not exceeding $85 per hour per attorney, and in total amount not exceeding $5000, shall be recoverable as costs (by the filing of a cost bill) by the prevailing party in any action or actions to enforce the provisions of this Agreement. The above $5000 limit is the total of attorney fees recoverable whether in the trial court, appellate court, or otherwise, and regardless of the number of attorneys, trials, appeals, or actions. It is the intent of this Agreement that neither party shall have to pay the other more than $5000 for attorney’s fees arising out of an action, or actions to enforce the provisions of this Agreement.
SECTION 18 - NONDISCRIMINATION
CONSULTANT warrants that it is an Equal Opportunity Employer and shall comply with applicable regulations governing equal employment opportunity. Neither CONSULTANT nor any of its subconsultants shall discriminate in the employment of any person because of race, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, sex, or age, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification pursuant to the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. 66 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 7 of 18
Rev 7/21
SECTION 19 - MEDIATION
Should any dispute arise out of this Agreement, any party may request that it be submitted to mediation. The parties shall meet in mediation within 30 days of a request. The mediator shall be agreed to by the mediating parties; in the absence of an agreement, the parties shall each submit one name from mediators listed by either the American Arbitration Association, the California State Board of Mediation and Conciliation, or other agreed upon service. The mediator shall be selected by a blind draw.
The cost of mediation shall be borne equally by the parties. Neither party shall be deemed the prevailing party. No party shall be permitted to file a legal action without first meeting in mediation and making a good faith attempt to reach a mediated settlement. The mediation process, once commenced by a meeting with the mediator, shall last until agreement is reached by the parties but not more than 60 days, unless the maximum time is extended by the parties.
SECTION 20 - LITIGATION
CONSULTANT shall testify at CITY's request if litigation is brought against CITY in connection with CONSULTANT's services under this Agreement. Unless the action is brought by CONSULTANT, or is based upon CONSULTANT's wrongdoing, CITY shall compensate CONSULTANT for preparation for testimony, testimony, and travel at CONSULTANT's standard hourly rates at the time of actual testimony.
SECTION 21 - NOTICES
All notices hereunder shall be given in writing and mailed, postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
To CITY: Matthew Fabry, Public Works Director
City of San Mateo
330 West 20th Avenue
San Mateo, California 94403
To CONSULTANT: HDR Engineering, Inc.
Attn: Elizabeth K. Mesbah, Vice President
3003 Oak Road, Suite 500
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
SECTION 22 - AGREEMENT CONTAINS ALL UNDERSTANDINGS; AMENDMENTS This document represents the entire and integrated agreement between CITY and CONSULTANT and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, and agreements, either written or oral.
This document may be amended only by written instrument, signed by both CITY and CONSULTANT. 67 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 8 of 18
Rev 7/21
SECTION 23 - AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT
CONSULTANT has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party.
SECTION 24 - SEVERABILITY
If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
SECTION 25 - GOVERNING LAW
This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.
SECTION 26 - VENUE
In the event of litigation, venue will be in the County of San Mateo. [SIGNATURES PAGE FOLLOWS]
68 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page
8 of 18
Rev 7/21
69 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 9 of 18
Rev 7/21
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement between the CITY OF SAN MATEO and HDR ENGINEERING, INC. has been duly executed by the parties hereinabove named, as of the day and year first above written.
CITY OF SAN MATEO CONSULTANT
Matthew Fabry
Public Works Director
Date Elizabeth (Libby) K. Mesbah
Its Authorized Agent
Vice President
If a Corporation, can be either
1) President or 2) Vice
President plus an additional
corporate officer (i.e.,
Secretary, Treasurer) who shall
sign below.
Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM ADDITIONAL CORPORATE
OFFICER
(if necessary per the above)
Linh P. Nguyen
Assistant City Attorney
Date Date
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Scope of Work
Exhibit B: Reserved
Exhibit C: Cost Schedule
Exhibit D: Insurance Requirements
70 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page
9 of 18
Rev 7/21
71 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 10 of 18
Rev 7/21
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
72 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 10 of 18
Rev 7/21
73 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 11 of 18
Rev 7/21
74 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 11 of 18
Rev 7/21
75 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 12 of 18
Rev 7/21
76 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 12 of 18
Rev 7/21
77 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 13 of 18
Rev 7/21
78 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 14 of 18
Rev 7/21
79 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 14 of 18
Rev 7/21
80 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 15 of 18
Rev 7/21
EXHIBIT B (Reserved)
81 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 15 of 18
Rev 7/21
82 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 16 of 18
Rev 7/21
EXHIBIT C
COST SCHEDULE
83 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 16 of 18
Rev 7/21
84 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 17 of 18
Rev 7/21
EXHIBIT D
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
MINIMUM SCOPE OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office (ISO) Form CG 00 01 12 07 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products-completed operations, personal & advertising injury, with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
2. Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if CONSULTANT has no owned autos, hired, (Code 8) and non-owned autos (Code 9), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Workers’ Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): Insurance appropriate to the CONSULTANT’s profession, with limit no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate If the CONSULTANT maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the CONSULTANT.
Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
Additional Insured Status
The City, its elected and appointed officials, employees, and agents are to be covered as insureds on the auto policy for liability arising out of automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT; and on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the CONSULTANT including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the CONSULTANT’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10, 11 85 or both CG 20 10 and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used).
85 of 1110
Professional Services – Estero (PW) Page 18 of 18
Rev 7/21
Primary Coverage
For any claims related to this contract, the CONSULTANT’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its elected and appointed officials, employees, and agents. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its elected and appointed officials, employees, or agents shall be excess of the CONSULTANT’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice (10 days for non-payment) has been given to the City.
Waiver of Subrogation
CONSULTANT hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said CONSULTANT may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.
CONSULTANT agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to effect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the CONSULTANT to purchase coverage with a lower deductible or retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention.
Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
Verification of Coverage
CONSULTANT shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the CONSULTANT’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. 86 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Agenda Report
City Hall
330 W. 20th Avenue
San Mateo CA 94403
www.cityofsanmateo.org
Agenda Number: 12 Section Name: CONSENT CALENDAR Account Number: 10-4666-01 File ID: 26-10803 TO: City Council
FROM: Alex Khojikian, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Public Works Department
MEETING DATE: January 26, 2026
SUBJECT:
On-Call Consultant Services for Transportation Analysis Report Preparation — Amendment RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Amendment No. 2 to the agreements with Kittelson and Associates, Inc., AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Steer Davies and Gleave, and Fehr and Peers to extend each agreement term through June 30, 2028, including up to one optional one-year extension, and to update the payment rates; increase Kittelson and Associates agreement by $200,000 for a total not-to-exceed amount of $600,000; and authorize the Public Works Director to execute the amendments in substantially the form presented and execute any future term extensions or amendments that do not change the not-toexceed amount of the agreements.
BACKGROUND:
The Public Works and Community Development Departments require consultant services to prepare transportation impact analyses (TIAs) and review transportation demand management (TDM) plans for private development projects. Given the high volume of private development projects, the potential for multiple analyses to occur simultaneously, and the need to maintain an efficient entitlement process, staff initiated a competitive Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process in August 2019 to establish on-call consultant teams.
In January 2020, the City Council approved 2.5-year agreements with four firms—AECOM, Fehr & Peers, Kittelson and Associates, and Steer Davies and Gleave—for a not-to-exceed amount of $250,000 per agreement to provide these services. Staff have been satisfied with the performance of these on-call consultants. In 2022 and 2023, new agreements were executed with each of the four firms to renew the services and extend the term through June 30, 2024.
On June 17, 2024, to ensure uninterrupted transportation analysis services for private development projects, Council approved Amendment No. 1, extending the existing agreements for an additional two years and increasing the not-toexceed amount per agreement by $150,000 (to a maximum of $400,000).
With the adoption of the 2040 General Plan and the passing of Measure T, staff initially anticipated a revised TIA development and review process in which developers would submit TIAs for peer review by the City, thereby reducing reliance on on-call consultants for full TIA preparation. However, recent changes in state housing laws have streamlined approvals for certain housing projects, imposing tighter decision timelines on local agencies from the date a planning application is submitted. These constraints shift additional responsibility and risk to local agencies. Concurrently, the City has experienced a significant influx of planning applications, with approximately 5,000 housing units currently in the pipeline, including several large projects exceeding 1,000 units.
To ensure that transportation analysis services for private development planning applications continue without interruption, Public Works recommends executing Amendment No. 2 to extend the existing agreements with all four 87 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
consultants for an additional two years (through June 30, 2028), updating the payment rates, and increasing the not-toexceed amount for the Kittelson and Associates agreement by $200,000, as it is the only firm currently forecasted to exhaust its funding before the end of the extended term.
BUDGET IMPACT:
Each consultant will be issued a blanket purchase order in alignment with the total not-to-exceed amount. The task orders will be charged to the planning application trust accounts, which are funded by the project developer, or to specific project accounts. All consultant costs will be charged to the appropriate account and are fully recovered.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
This item is not a project subject to CEQA, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that extending agreements for professional transportation review services may have a significant effect on the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).)
NOTICE PROVIDED
All meeting noticing requirements were met.
ATTACHMENTS
Att 1 – Amendment No. 2 – Kittelson and Associates
Att 2 – Amendment No. 2 – AECOM
Att 3 – Amendment No. 2 – Steer Davies
Att 4 – Amendment No. 2 – Fehr and Peers
STAFF CONTACT
Jay Yu, Engineering Manager
[email protected]
(650) 522-7323
88 of 1110
Contract Amendment
CAO Approved March 2024
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN MATEO AND
KITTELSON AND ASSOCIATES FOR
ON-CALL TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT PREPARATION
($250,000 [Original Amount] $150,000 [Amendment No. 1]
$200,000 [Amendment No. 2])
This Amendment is made and entered into this day of _______ 2026, by and between the CITY OF SAN MATEO, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of California ("CITY"), and KITTELSON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. ("CONSULTANT").
WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT entered into an Agreement for On-Call Transportation Analysis Report Preparation Services (“Agreement”) on January 23, 2020; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2024, CITY and CONSULTANT executed Amendment No. 1 to extend the term of agreement to June 30, 2026, and include additional compensation in the amount of $150,000, for a total amount of $400,000; and
WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT wish to amend the Agreement to extend the term of the agreement and include additional compensation in the amount of $200,000, for a revised total agreement amount of $600,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. Section 4, “Term,” of the Agreement is amended to read:
“The services to be performed under this Agreement shall commence January 22, 2020, and be completed on June 30, 2028, with an option for a one-year extension.”
2. Section 5, “Payment,” of the Agreement is amended to read:
“In consideration for the full performance of the services set forth in Exhibit A, CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT a fee in an amount not to exceed $600,000, pursuant to rates stated in Exhibit B to this Agreement, attached and incorporated by reference.”
3. Exhibit B, attached and incorporated by reference, hereby replaces Exhibit B of the Agreement in its entirety.
4. The remaining terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
89 of 1110
Contract Amendment
CAO Approved March 2024
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY OF SAN MATEO and CONSULTANT have executed this Amendment on ________________.
CITY OF SAN MATEO CONSULTANT
Matt Fabry
Public Works Director
Dave Mills
Its Authorized Agent
Vice President
If a Corporation, can be either 1) President or 2)
Vice President plus an additional corporate
officer (i.e., Secretary, Treasurer) who shall sign
below.
APPROVED AS TO FORM ADDITIONAL CORPORATE OFFICER
(if necessary per the above)
Linh Nguyen
Assistant City Attorney
Marc Butorac
Vice President
90 of 1110
Contract Amendment
CAO Approved March 2024
Exhibit B
91 of 1110
Contract Amendment
CAO Approved March 2024
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN MATEO AND
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. FOR
ON-CALL TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT PREPARATION
($250,000 [Original Amount] / $150,000 [[Amendment No. 1] / $0 [Amendment No. 2])
This Amendment is made and entered into this day of ___________ 2026, by and between the CITY OF SAN MATEO, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of California ("CITY"), and AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. ("CONSULTANT").
WHEREAS, on January 23, 2020, CITY and CONSULTANT executed an agreement for On-Call Transportation Analysis Report Preparation Services (“Agreement”); and WHEREAS, on July 11, 2024, CITY and CONSULTANT executed Amendment No. 1 to extend the term of the Agreement and to increase the Agreement amount by $150,000, for a revised Agreement amount of $400,000; and
WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT wish to amend the Agreement to extend the term of the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. Section 4, “Term,” of the Agreement is amended to read:
“The services to be performed under this Agreement shall commence on January 22, 2020 and be completed on June 30, 2028, with option for a one-year extension.”
2. The remaining terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
92 of 1110
Contract Amendment
CAO Approved March 2024
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY OF SAN MATEO and CONSULTANT have executed this Amendment on ______________.
CITY OF SAN MATEO CONSULTANT
Matt Fabry
Public Works Director
Scott C Kelsey
Its Authorized Agent
Associate Vice President
If a Corporation, can be either 1) President or 2)
Vice President plus an additional corporate
officer (i.e., Secretary, Treasurer) who shall sign
below.
APPROVED AS TO FORM ADDITIONAL CORPORATE OFFICER
(if necessary per the above)
Ling Nguyen Millette Litzinger, PE
Assistant City Attorney Associate Vice President
93 of 1110
Contract Amendment
CAO Approved March 2024
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN MATEO AND
STEER DAVIES AND GLEAVE, INC. FOR
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN PREPARATION
($250,000 [Original Amount] $150,000 [Amendment No. 1]
$0 [Amendment No. 2])
This Amendment is made and entered into this day of ______ _ _ , 2026, by and between the CITY OF SAN MATEO, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of California ("CITY"), and STEER DAVIES AND GLEAVE, INC. ("CONSULTANT").
WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT entered into an Agreement for Transportation Demand Management Plan Preparation Services (“Agreement”) on January 23, 2020; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2024, CITY and CONSULTANT executed Amendment No. 1 to extend the term of agreement to June 30, 2026, and include additional compensation by $150,000, for an Agreement total of $400,000; and
WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT wish to amend the Agreement to extend the term of the Agreement and update the CONSULTANT’s payment rates.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. Section 4, “Term,” of the Agreement is amended to read:
“The services to be performed under this Agreement shall commence on January 23, 2020 and be completed on June 30, 2028, with option for a one-year extension.”
2. Exhibit B, attached and incorporated by reference, hereby replaces Exhibit B of the Agreement.
3. The remaining terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
94 of 1110
Contract Amendment
CAO Approved March 2024
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY OF SAN MATEO and CONSULTANT have executed this Amendment on _________________.
CITY OF SAN MATEO CONSULTANT
Matt Fabry
Public Works Director
Anita Woods
Its Authorized Agent
President
If a Corporation, can be either 1) President or 2)
Vice President plus an additional corporate
officer (i.e., Secretary, Treasurer) who shall sign
below.
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Ling Nguyen
Assistant City Attorney
95 of 1110
Contract Amendment
CAO Approved March 2024
96 of 1110
Contract Amendment
CAO Approved March 2024
EXHIBIT B
97 of 1110
Contract Amendment
CAO Approved March 2024
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN MATEO AND
FEHR & PEERS FOR
ON-CALL TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS REPORT PREPARATION
($250,000 [Original Amount] $150,000 [Amendment No. 1]
$0 [Amendment No. 2])
This Amendment is made and entered into this day of ________2026, by and between the CITY OF SAN MATEO, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of California ("CITY"), and FEHR & PEERS ("CONSULTANT").
WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT entered into an Agreement for On-Call Transportation Analysis Report Preparation Services (“Agreement”) on January 23, 2020; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2024, CITY and CONSULTANT executed Amendment No. 1 to extend the term of agreement to June 30, 2026, and include additional compensation by $150,000, for a revised Agreement amount of $400,000; and
WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT wish to amend the Agreement to extend the term of the agreement and to update CONSULTANT’s payment rates.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. Section 4, “Term,” of the Agreement is amended to read:
“The services to be performed under this Agreement shall commence on January 23, 2020 and be completed on June 30, 2028, with option for a one-year extension.”
2. Exhibit B, attached and incorporated by reference, hereby replaces Exhibit B of the Agreement.
3. The remaining terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
98 of 1110
Contract Amendment
CAO Approved March 2024
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY OF SAN MATEO and CONSULTANT have executed this Amendment on _____________.
CITY OF SAN MATEO CONSULTANT
Matt Fabry
Public Works Director
Chris Mitchell
Its Authorized Agent
President
APPROVED AS TO FORM
Linh Nguyen
Assistant City Attorney
99 of 1110
Contract Amendment
CAO Approved March 2024
100 of 1110
Contract Amendment
CAO Approved March 2024
EXHIBIT B
101 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Agenda Report
City Hall
330 W. 20th Avenue
San Mateo CA 94403
www.cityofsanmateo.org
Agenda Number: 13 Section Name: CONSENT CALENDAR Account Number: 10-6121 File ID: 25-10780 TO: City Council
FROM: Alex Khojikian, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Parks and Recreation Department
MEETING DATE: January 26, 2026
SUBJECT:
Citywide Tree Planting Services — Bid Rejection
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a Resolution to reject all bids received for the Citywide Tree Planting Services Project.
BACKGROUND:
On October 24, 2025, a Notice Inviting Sealed Bids was posted on the City’s website for Citywide Tree Planting Services. A total of three (3) bids were received by the submission deadline on November 14, 2025. The bid results are detailed below:
Bidder Total Base Bid
New Image Landscape Company $232,175.00
Loral Horticultural Services Inc. $240,675.00
West Coast Arborists $273,775.00
The Request for Proposals was posted to the City Bid Posting page; however, no posting was executed to provide notification via the local newspaper. A notice inviting sealed bids published in a local newspaper of general circulation is part of the Bid Notice Requirements of the City of San Mateo’s Purchasing Policy. Therefore, staff recommends rejecting all bids to allow for cancellation of the project. A subset of approximately 100 trees requested by homeowners through the Street Tree Planting program will be planted by April 2026.
BUDGET IMPACT:
There is no budgetary impact associated with this administrative action.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
This item is not a project subject to CEQA, because CEQA does not apply to projects that are disapproved. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15270.)
NOTICE PROVIDED
All meeting noticing requirements were met.
ATTACHMENTS
Att 1 – Proposed Resolution
STAFF CONTACT
Timothy Heartquist, Manager Arborist
[email protected]
650-522-7425
102 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
RESOLUTION NO. ___ (2026)
REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR THE CITY-WIDE TREE PLANTING PROJECT WHEREAS, bids were received for planting approximately 250 trees at various locations throughout the City for the City-Wide Tree Planting Project (“Project”); and WHEREAS, the City received three bids on November 14, 2025; and WHEREAS, staff recommends the rejection of all bids.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that:
1. This bid rejection is not a project subject to CEQA because CEQA does not apply to projects that are disapproved. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15270).
2. In accordance with the provisions of San Mateo Municipal Code Section 3.60.040(a)(4), all bids received on November 14, 2025 for the Project are rejected.
103 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Agenda Report
City Hall
330 W. 20th Avenue
San Mateo CA 94403
www.cityofsanmateo.org
Agenda Number: 14 Section Name: CONSENT CALENDAR Account Number: 18-6113 File ID: 26-10815 TO: City Council
FROM: Alex Khojikian, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Parks and Recreation Department
MEETING DATE: January 26, 2026
SUBJECT:
Lakeshore Park Batting Cage, Ball Fields, and Concession Building – Lease Agreement RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a five-year lease agreement with San Mateo National Little League for the batting cage, ball fields, and concessions building at Lakeshore Park, for the period of February 1, 2026, through December 31, 2031, and authorize the Parks and Recreation Director to sign the agreement on behalf of the City in substantially the form presented.
BACKGROUND:
San Mateo National Little League (SMNLL), which serves an average of approximately 350 youth participants per little league season, has been a long-time user of Martens Field in Lakeshore Park as its primary field and has operated a concession to help offset operating costs. In addition, SMNLL installed and continues to maintain the batting cage located at the field. The lease agreement (Att. 1) continues the current operating relationship with SMNLL for use of these facilities. This lease agreement enhances community engagement through sport, provides a popular recreational service for San Mateo youth, and contributes to the effective utilization of City Park facilities. The terms and conditions of the lease agreement are consistent with those of other youth sports organizations that operate in local parks, such as San Mateo American Little League at Trinta Park, and with San Mateo Youth Softball Association’s at Chanteloup Field in Beresford Park.
Key Provisions of the Lease Agreement:
• Term and Premises: Five-year lease from February 1, 2026 through December 31, 2031, for use of the batting cage, concession building, and designated ball fields at Lakeshore Park. • Use and Operations: The League is authorized to operate youth baseball practices, games, and concessions. The batting cage remains City property and must be made available to other City-approved youth sports organizations upon request, with League use having priority. Facility use, hours, amplified sound, and operations must comply with City regulations and good-neighbor practices.
• Maintenance and Repairs: The League is responsible for routine maintenance, cleaning, and upkeep of the batting cage, concession building, and grass infield areas. Major repairs remain the responsibility of the City, with required notification by the League.
• Risk Management and Termination: The League must meet City insurance and indemnification requirements. The City may terminate the lease for cause or for convenience with 30 days’ written notice.
Concession Provisions:
• Exclusive Operator: The League is designated the exclusive concessionaire at Lakeshore Park pursuant to Government Code Section 51038.
• Permitted Sales and Pricing: Concession operations are limited to food, sundries, souvenirs, and similar items, with pricing required to remain consistent with prevailing market rates as determined by the City. • Use of Proceeds: A portion of concession revenues must be reinvested into approved improvement projects at 104 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Lakeshore Park.
• Health and Safety Oversight: The City retains the right to suspend or close concession operations if health or safety concerns arise.
Other Provisions:
• Security and Access: The League may not alter locks or security systems without City approval and must ensure City access at all times.
• Improvements and Compliance: All League-initiated improvements require prior City approval and must comply with applicable codes, permits, and prevailing wage requirements. • Inspection and Enforcement: The City retains inspection rights to ensure compliance with lease terms and applicable laws.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The League will be responsible for all applicable per player fees and seasonal permit charges in accordance with the City’s adopted fee schedule. The City will continue to provide water service to support field and facility use, while the League will reimburse the City for fifty percent (50%) of electrical costs associated with the premises, invoiced on a semiannual basis.
Overall, the agreement is structured to recover operational costs associated with League use while supporting youth sports programming and reinvestment in Lakeshore Park facilities.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
This agreement is categorically exempt from CEQA as an “existing facility,” because it consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15301.)
NOTICE PROVIDED
All meeting noticing requirements were met.
ATTACHMENTS
Att 1 – Lease Agreement
STAFF CONTACT
Tracy Brumett, Community Services Section Manager
[email protected]
(650) 522-7443
105 of 1110
1 LEASE AGREEMENT
BATTING CAGE, BALL FIELDS AND CONCESSIONS BUILDING AT LAKESHORE PARK This Lease, made and entered into this day of ____________________, by and between the CITY OF SAN MATEO, a municipal corporation existing under the laws of the State of California (“CITY”), hereinafter “City” and SAN MATEO NATIONAL LITTLE LEAGUE, a California non-profit corporation, hereinafter “League.”
RECITALS
WHEREAS, City owns certain real property developed as a part of Lakeshore Park, located within the City of San Mateo, San Mateo County, outlined in Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference ("PREMISES"); and
WHEREAS, the City and League agree that it is reasonable and desirable for the League, an established and recognized community organization, to maintain and operate certain recreational facilities located on the Premises ("BATTING CAGE," “BALL FIELDS) and ("CONCESSION BUILDING") as further described herein; and
WHEREAS, under this Lease, City intendsto grant the Premises lease to League for the purposes of maintaining and operating the Batting Cage and Building and using Ball Fields.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the League's maintenance of the Batting Cage, Concession Building, and Ball Fields promises set forth above, the City authorizes League to use those facilities, and the parties agree as follows:
1. PURPOSE: The purpose of this Lease is to:
a. Allow League to maintain the Batting Cage as a baseball practice recreational facility for City and community group use.
b. Allow League to use the Batting Cage (Batting Cage), Concession Building (Building), and Ball Fields (Ball Fields) located withinLakeshore Park, at 1500 Marina Ct. asshown in Exhibit A.
2. TERM: The term of this Lease shall commence February 1, 2026, and conclude on December 31, 2031.
3. USE OF BATTING CAGE: It is understood that the Batting Cage is City property; however, the City grants League use of the Batting Cage and authorizes League or its approved user to conduct batting practice in the Batting Cage. League will ensure that sufficient netting is provided inside the cage to reduce the noise of balls hitting the fencing.
League agrees to make Batting Cage available to other City of San Mateo resident youth sports organizations upon request by those organizations. To clarify, when a youth sports group (other than the League) rents the field, it does not automatically include use of the Batting Cage. Before allowing use of the Batting Cage, the League must refer those potential users to the City. The City will approve the user and enter into a written agreement with that user requiring compliance with the City's insurance, indemnity, hold harmless and other facility rental requirements. City will then refer the user back to League to coordinate use. League use will have priority over renter use.
All users of the Batting Cage must abide by the following rules:
106 of 1110
2 1. Only rubber balls may be used in the Batting Cage.
2. Use by League and scheduled users may only take place during the following times:
• Monday-Saturday: 9am-7pm
• Sunday: 10am-7pm
Use hours and conditions subject to change by City based upon neighborhood impact.
City shall have no responsibility or liability for loss or damage to the personal property of League, its players, coaches, volunteers or officials that are placed or stored in the Batting Cage, including but not exclusive of netting, pitching machines, electrical cables, balls, player equipment or other items.
4. USE OF CONCESSIONS BUILDING: The Building, including but not limited to concession sales goods, equipment, vehicles, supplies, money, personal effects, player equipment, and other items, shall be used solely for the sale of food, sundries, souvenirs, and similar articles, and for the storage of League equipment and supplies. The City reserves the right to specify any articles that may not be sold or otherwise distributed by the League at the concession stand. Pursuant to Gov’t. Code 51038, League will be the exclusive concessionaire for Lakeshore Park.
5. USE OF BALL FIELDS: Upon obtaining the required seasonal permits and paying all applicable fees, the League may use the Ball Fields for practices and games associated with the Little League season.
Use of amplified sound equipment shall comply with all requirements of the San Mateo Municipal Code and good neighbor practices and is permitted only for limited purposes, such as opening day ceremonies and announcing upcoming batters, scores, and other game-related information. Amplified sound shall not be used for ongoing game commentary or for playing music before, during, or after games, except for the National Anthem. Complaints regarding excessive noise levels or other neighborhood impacts resulting from amplified sound may be grounds for the City to require discontinuation of such use.
The use and storage of vehicles on the Premises must be approved in advance by the City and, if gaspowered, shall comply with all applicable fire safety and municipal codes. Vehicles must be securely stored when not in use and shall be operated only under adult supervision at all times. Any vehicle operated on City property must be maintained in safe operating condition, including vehicles such as golf carts or all-terrain vehicles (ATVs). All use of the Ball Fields shall conform to the San Mateo Municipal Code and special park rules.
6. IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: The League agrees to identify specific projects at Lakeshore Park and devote a portion of the proceeds from the concession stand to complete these projects.
Representatives of the League and the City will meet annually prior to the league opening or if by mutual agreement, the end of the season, to discuss the upcoming season's projects. Some projects may take more than one season to complete or to accumulate sufficient funds to complete. Any work done at the facility must comply with established Master Plans, adhere to existing codes, receive necessary permits, comply with state prevailing wage law, and be approved in advance by the Parks and Recreation Director or designee before work can begin.
7. CHARGES BY LESSEE: League concession operation shall charge no more than prices generally prevailing for similar concessions; as such determination shall be made from time to time by City Manager, or their designee.
107 of 1110
3 8. UTILITIES: The City shall provide water required by the League at the Building and Ball Fields.
All other utilities associated with the operation of the concession stand, including electricity, gas, garbage, and related services, shall be the responsibility of the League.
Because separate electrical meters will not be installed, the League shall reimburse the City for 50% of the monthly electrical cost for the Premises. The City will invoice the League for its share of electrical costs for two six-month periods. Any unusual or non-typical electrical usage by the City during nonleague months will be considered when determining the League’s payment amount.
9. PAYMENT: Payments, including, but not limited to per player fees and booking fees, are due one month (30 days) after the City releases the permits. Payment for utilities shall be remitted to the City within thirty (30) days of invoice date.
10. NO ASSIGNMENT: League shall not assign this Lease or any portion thereof, nor sublet the Building, Batting Cage or Ball Fields without the prior written consent of City.
11. CONDITION OF PREMISES: The League shall ensure that the Building, backstops, windscreens, and adjacent areas are maintained in a clean and sanitary condition at all times, to the satisfaction of the City. Storage areas within the concession stand shall be kept neat, orderly, and clean. All doorways and windows must remain clear, unobstructed, and accessible at all times. The League shall keep the Batting Cage and Building secured whenever they are not in use. Any additional storage containers located outside of the Building, including but not limited to knack boxes and tool storage, must be clearly labeled, locked, securely maintained, and placed in locations approved by the City.
12. SECURITY AND ACCESS: The League shall not change, replace, or add any locks, deadbolts, security devices, cameras, or similar hardware on any doors, windows, gates, or other access points to the Premises, including the Building, Batting Cage, or Ball Fields, whether interior or exterior, without the prior written consent of the City. The League shall not install any devices that prevent City access to the Premises as permitted under this Lease and applicable law.
Any unauthorized changes to locks or security devices shall constitute a material breach of this Lease. If the League violates this provision, the City may, at the League’s expense, remove unauthorized devices and restore the Premises to their original condition. The League shall promptly provide all keys, fobs, access cards, or other access devices to the City upon request and upon termination of the Lease.
13. MAINTENANCE: The League shall be responsible for routine maintenance, cleaning, and general upkeep of the Building and Batting Cage. The League further agrees to maintain the grass infield portions of both Ball Fields, as applicable, in accordance with the Mandatory Guidelines for Ball Field Preparation (Exhibit B) and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District General Requirements (Exhibit C). Such maintenance includes, but is not limited to, mowing, fertilization, irrigation, and field renovation when necessary. League is prohibited from applying any pesticides to the premises.
Any improvements installed by the League with prior City approval shall be maintained by the League. If the League fails to adequately maintain League-installed improvements, the City shall provide written notice identifying the required maintenance and a reasonable timeframe for completion. If the League does not complete the maintenance within the specified timeframe, the City may perform the maintenance and bill the League for the full cost of the work.
108 of 1110
4 The League shall maintain the Batting Cage in compliance with all applicable City laws, regulations, and safety standards. The roof, structure, and fencing of the Batting Cage shall be kept in good repair and in an attractive condition at all times. The City shall have the right to enter and inspect the Batting Cage to determine compliance with this Lease and to verify that the site is being maintained in a reasonably safe manner.
14. REPAIRS: The League shall promptly notify the City of any conditions requiring repair to the Building, Batting Cage, or Ball Fields. Except as otherwise provided in this Lease, the City shall be responsible for completing repairs within a reasonable timeframe after receiving notice. The League shall cooperate with the City to allow access as needed to complete such repairs.
15. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE: The City may terminate this lease if the City determines that League has failed to maintain and operate the business and Premises in accordance with the terms of this lease, or any consent or permission given hereunder, or with any statute or ordinance effective with reference to such maintenance or operation. The City may begin the termination process of lease for cause at any time by notifying the League of lease violations. The League will have 30 days from the date of such notification to correct such violations or to take corrective steps, if the 30-day period is, as agreed between the City Manager and the League, inadequate to correct such violations. If the League has not corrected violations within the time frame described above, termination becomes immediately effective. In the event of termination as herein above provided, a proration of rentals paid or due, or of any damages due, shall be determined and adjustments made between City and League.
In the event any action of the League when operating the concession stand creates a health or safety hazard, City reserves the right to close the concession stand operation immediately and keep it closed until the unsafe situation has been corrected.
If the League fails to comply with the terms of this Lease, the City may require that the Batting Cage be removed, and park returned to its previous condition at the expense of the League. If it is determined by the City that this Lease, for any reason, is to be terminated or that the Batting Cage is to be removed, the City agrees to contact the League to inform League of the circumstance and work towards a mutual resolution. Removal in this circumstance would be at the City's expense.
If for any reason, the League no longer intends to use or maintain the Batting Cage, it may terminate this Lease. If so, the League must notify the City in writing. At City's discretion, it will either require League to remove the Batting Cage and restore the park to its original condition at League expense; or keep the Batting Cage in place and become wholly and solely responsible for its use and maintenance.
16. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE: This Lease may be terminated by the City at any time by giving the League written notice at least thirty (30) days in advance.
17. WAIVER; INSPECTION; COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS: The Building shall be open to inspection at all times by the City Manager and authorized employees and representatives of City, and League shall at all times maintain and operate the business and Building in full compliance with all applicable laws. City's right to inspect shall in no way diminish League's duty to keep Building in good and safe condition and repair or to maintain and operate the business and Building in full compliance with all applicable laws.
109 of 1110
5 18. INDEMNITY: League agrees to hold harmless and indemnify CITY, its elected and appointed officials, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, loss, liability, damage, and expense arising out of League’s performance of this Lease, except for those claims arising out of CITY’s sole negligence or willful misconduct. League agrees to defend City, its elected and appointed officials, employees, and agents against any such claims. The League’s duty to indemnify shall survive expiration or early termination of this Lease.
19. INSURANCE: Little League must comply with the insurance requirements, attached as Exhibit D and incorporated by reference.
20. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE: This Lease shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and, in the event of litigation, venue will be in the County of San Mateo.
21. NOTICES: All notices required to be given hereunder shall be in writing, and delivered in person or transmitted by First Class Mail, postage prepaid.
To City:
City of San Mateo, Parks & Recreation Department
Attn: Community Services Section Manager
330West 20th Avenue
San Mateo, CA 94403
To League:
San Mateo National Little League
P.O. Box 5188
San Mateo, CA 94402
//
//
110 of 1110
6 22. COSTS AND ATTORNEY’S FEES: Attorney fees in total amount not exceeding $5000, shall be recoverable as costs (by the filing of a cost bill) by the prevailing party in any action or actions to enforce the provisions of this Lease. The above $5000 limit is the total of attorney fees recoverable whether in the trial court, appellate court, or otherwise, and regardless of the number of attorneys, trials, appeals, or actions. It is the intent of this Lease that neither party shall have to pay the other more than $5000 for attorney fees arising out of an action, or actions to enforce the provisions of this Lease.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY OF SAN MATEO and SAN MATEO LITTLE LEAGUE have executed this Lease the day and year first above written.
City of San Mateo San Mateo National Little League
________________________ _____________________________
Joanne Magrini Justin Rhodes
Director of Parks & Recreation SMNLL President
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________ __________________________________ Martin McTaggart, City Clerk Mazarin Vakharia, Assistant City Attorney Attachments:
Exhibit A: Map
Exhibit B: Ball Field Preparation
Exhibit C: Bay Area Air Quality Regulations
Exhibit D: Insurance
111 of 1110
Exhibit A
Lakeshore Park
1500 Marina Court, San Mateo, CA 94403
112 of 1110
Exhibit B
Mandatory Guidelines for Ballfield Preparation
1. Water the Infield Dirt: To effectively minimize dust, it is crucial to water the infield dirt thoroughly before any dragging takes place. Properly watering the infield not only reduces airborne dust but also creates a safer playing surface by maintaining the integrity of the dirt.
2. Drag the Infield Dirt: Once the infield is sufficiently watered, drag the dirt to create a smooth and safe playing surface.
3. Rake the Infield Areas: Rake the infield areas near the bases, batter's box, and mound to eliminate any uneven spots and debris.
4. Chalk Lines: Accurately chalk the necessary lines on the field, including batter's box, foul lines and on deck circles.
5. Put Away Equipment: After use, ensure that all equipment is returned to its designated storage area.
Failure to follow these protocols may result in field closures and the suspension of programming.
Fines may be assessed by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District if regulations and requirements are not met.
All City owned ballfields have water access with a connection. If the quick connect or coupler key is not located, please contact the Parks & Recreation Department at [email protected] or 650-522-7400.
Acknowledge and Agree:
_____________________________
Justin Rhodes, President SMNLL
113 of 1110
Bay Area Air Quality Management District August 1, 2018 6-1-1
REGULATION 6
PARTICULATE MATTER
RULE 1
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
INDEX
6-1-100 GENERAL
6-1-101 Description
6-1-102 Applicability of General Provisions:
6-1-110 Exemptions for Activities Subject to Other Rules and Regulations 6-1-111 Limited Exemption, Blasting Operations
6-1-112 Limited Exemption, Portland Cement Manufacturing 6-1-113 Limited Exemption, Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Concentration and Weight Limitations
6-1-114 Limited Exemption, Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Emission Limits for Fuel Combustion
6-1-115 Limited Exemption, Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Concentration Limitations 6-1-116 Limited Exemption, Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Limits 6-1-117 Limited Exemption, Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Limits 6-1-200 DEFINITIONS
6-1-201 Active Operations
6-1-202 Bulk Material
6-1-203 Bulk Material Site
6-1-204 Exhaust Gas Volume
6-1-205 Particle
6-1-206 Process Weight
6-1-207 Process Weight Rate and Exhaust Gas Rate
6-1-208 Regulated Bulk Material Site
6-1-209 Stockpile
6-1-210 Workday
6-1-300 STANDARDS
6-1-301 Ringelmann No. 1 Limitation
6-1-302 Opacity Limitation
6-1-303 Ringelmann No. 2 Limitation
6-1-304 Tube Cleaning
6-1-305 Visible Particles
6-1-306 Pile Driving Hammers
6-1-307 Prohibition of Visible Emissions Within and From Regulated Bulk Material Sites 6-1-310 Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Concentration Limits 6-1-311 Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Weight Limits 6-1-320 Sulfuric Acid Manufacturing Plants
6-1-330 Sulfur Recovery Units
6-1-400 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
6-1-401 Appearance of Emissions
6-1-402 Alternate Source Test Frequency
6-1-500 MONITORING AND RECORDS
114 of 1110
Bay Area Air Quality Management District August 1, 2018 6-1-2
6-1-501 Sampling Facilities and Instruments Required
6-1-502 Data, Records and Reporting
6-1-503 Records
6-1-504 Demonstration of Total Suspended Particle (TSP) Compliance 6-1-505 Demonstration of SO3 / Sulfuric Acid Mist Compliance 6-1-506 Monitoring and Recordkeeping at Regulated Bulk Material Sites 6-1-600 MANUAL OF PROCEDURES
6-1-601 Applicability of Test Methods
6-1-602 Methods for Determining Compliance
115 of 1110
Bay Area Air Quality Management District August 1, 2018 6-1-3
REGULATION 6
PARTICULATE MATTER
RULE 1
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
6-1-100 GENERAL
6-1-101 Description: The purpose of this Regulation is to limit the quantity of particulate matter in the atmosphere through the establishment of limitations on emission rates, emission concentrations, visible emissions and opacity.
(Amended 8/1/18)
6-1-102 Applicability of General Provisions: The general provisions and definitions in Regulation 1 and Regulation 6 shall apply to this rule. (Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-110 Exemptions for Activities Subject to Other Rules and Regulations:
110.1 Temporary Sandblasting Operations: The provisions of this rule shall not apply to Temporary Sandblasting operations. Such operations are subject to the provisions of Regulation 12, Rule 4.
110.2 Open Outdoor Fires: The provisions of this rule shall not apply to emissions arising from open outdoor fires. Such open outdoor fires are subject to the provisions of Regulation 5.
110.3 Wood Burning Devices: The provisions of this rule shall not apply to sources subject to the provisions of Regulation 6, Rule 3.
110.4 Metal Recycling and Shredding Operations: The provisions of this rule shall not apply to sources subject to the provisions of Regulation 6, Rule 4. (Adopted 7/11/90, 12/19/90, Amended 8/1/18)
6-1-111 Limited Exemption, Blasting Operations: Blasting operations that are conducted by certified blasters who have met the blasting ordinances and requirements for licensing and permitting by the State of California Department of Industrial Relations Division of Occupational Safety and Health or other applicable local permitting authority are not subject to Sections 6-1-307 and 6-1-506.
(Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-112 Limited Exemption, Portland Cement Manufacturing: Sections 6-1-307, 310 and 311 shall not apply to particulate emissions from sources subject to the provisions of Regulation 9, Rule 13.
(Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-113 Limited Exemption, Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Concentration and Weight Limitations: Sections 6-1-310.2, 311.2 and 504 shall not apply to particulate matter emissions from the following sources:
113.1 Commercial cooking equipment subject to the provisions of Regulation 6, Rule 2.
113.2 Salt processing operations whose TSP emissions are greater than 99 weight percent salt.
(Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-114 Limited Exemption, Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Emission Limits for Fuel Combustion: Sections 6-1-310.2 and 311.2 shall not apply to particulate matter emissions from the following sources:
114.1 Gas-, liquid- and solid-fuel fired indirect heat exchangers, including furnaces, heaters, boilers, gas turbines and supplemental fuel-fired heat recovery steam generators, but excluding Carbon Monoxide Boilers downstream of Petroleum Refinery Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit regenerators.
114.2 Gas-fuel fired control devices that control only gaseous emissions. 114.3 Section 6-1-504 shall not apply to gas-fuel fired indirect heat exchangers or gas-fuel fired control devices that control only gaseous emissions. Liquid- and solid-fuel fired indirect heat exchangers shall remain subject to Section 6-1- 504.
(Adopted 8/1/18)
116 of 1110
Bay Area Air Quality Management District August 1, 2018 6-1-4
6-1-115 Limited Exemption, Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Concentration Limitation:
Section 6-1-310.2 shall not apply to particulate emissions from a sewage treatment plant solid waste incinerator abated by a wet scrubber with an Air District Permit to Operate until July 1, 2025.
(Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-116 Limited Exemption, Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Limits: Section 6-1-310.2 and 311.2 shall not apply to particulate emissions from a carbon monoxide boiler abated by a water scrubber with an Air District Permit to Operate. (Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-117 Limited Exemption, Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Limits: Section 6-1-310.2 and 6-1-311.2 shall not apply to particulate emissions from a petroleum coke calcining unit abated by a baghouse with an Air District Permit to Operate until January 1, 2022. (Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-200 DEFINITIONS
6-1-201 Active Operations: As defined in Regulation 6-201, any activity with the potential to create particulate emissions from any source or fugitive dust emissions. (Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-202 Bulk Material: As defined in Regulation 6-202, any unpackaged sand, soil, gravel, aggregate, solid construction material, solid industrial chemical or other unpackaged solids less than 2 inches in length or diameter.
(Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-203 Bulk Material Site: As defined in Regulation 6-203, any site with one or more stockpiles of bulk material greater than 5 feet high or with a footprint greater than 100 square feet.
(Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-204 Exhaust Gas Volume: The volume of gases discharged from an operation or an emission point, corrected to standard conditions (as defined in Regulation 1-228), excluding water vapor or steam.
(Renumbered and Amended 8/1/18)
6-1-205 Particle: A minute quantity of solid matter or liquid droplet. (Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-206 Process Weight: The total weight of all material introduced into an operation, including solid fuels and process air, but excluding (i) liquids and gases used solely as fuels, (ii) air that is not consumed as a reactant or is not critical to the process, (iii) air that is used only for dilution, and (iv) combustion air.
(Renumbered and Amended 8/1/18)
6-1-207 Process Weight Rate and Exhaust Gas Rate: A rate established as follows:
207.1 For continuous or long-run, steady-state operations, the total process weight or exhaust gas volume for the entire period of continuous operation or for a typical portion thereof, divided by the number of hours of such period or portions thereof.
207.2 For cyclical or batch operations, the total process weight or exhaust gas volume for a period that covers a complete operation or an integer number of cycles, divided by the hours of actual process operation during such period.
Where the nature of any process or operation or the design of any equipment is such as to permit more than one interpretation of this section, that interpretation which results in the minimum value for allowable emission shall apply.
(Renumbered and Amended 8/1/18)
6-1-208 Regulated Bulk Material Site: A bulk material site that (i) produces, handles, loads, unloads, stores or uses more than 10 tons per year of bulk materials; and (ii) is subject to an authority to construct and/or permit to operate for bulk material storage and handling issued by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. (Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-209 Stockpile: As defined in Regulation 6-208, an open or unenclosed storage pile of bulk material, external to any barn, pit or silo.
(Adopted 8/1/18)
117 of 1110
Bay Area Air Quality Management District August 1, 2018 6-1-5
6-1-210 Workday: As defined in Regulation 6-210, any period, typically 8 – 12-hour shifts, when active operations occur on the site.
(Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-300 STANDARDS
6-1-301 Ringelmann No. 1 Limitation: Except as provided in Sections 6-1-303, 304 and 306, a person shall not emit from any source for a period or aggregate periods of more than three minutes in any hour, a visible emission that is as dark or darker than No. 1 on the Ringelmann Chart, or of such opacity as to obscure an observer's view to an equivalent or greater degree.
(Amended 7/11/90, 8/1/18)
6-1-302 Opacity Limitation: Except as provided in Sections 6-1-303, 304 and 306, a person shall not emit from any source for a period or aggregate periods of more than three minutes in any hour an emission equal to or greater than 20% opacity. (Amended 7/11/90, 8/1/18)
6-1-303 Ringelmann No. 2 Limitation: A person shall not emit for a period or aggregate periods of more than three minutes in any hour, a visible emission that is as dark or darker than No. 2 on the Ringelmann Chart, or of such opacity as to obscure an observer's view to an equivalent or greater degree, or be equal to or greater than 40 percent opacity, from the following sources:
303.1 Internal combustion engines of less than 25 liters (1500 in3) displacement; 303.2 Engines used solely as a standby source of motive power; 303.3 Laboratory equipment used exclusively for chemical or physical analyses or experimentation;
303.4 Portable brazing, soldering or welding equipment. (Amended 1/5/83, 7/11/90, 8/1/18)
6-1-304 Tube Cleaning: During tube cleaning, and except for three minutes in any hour, a person shall not emit from any heat transfer operation using fuel at a rate of not less than 148 GJ (140 million BTU) per hour, a visible emission as dark or darker than No. 2 on the Ringelmann Chart, or of such opacity as to obscure an observer's view to an equivalent or greater degree, or equal to or greater than 40 percent opacity. The aggregate duration of such emissions in any 24-hour period shall not exceed 6.0 minutes per 1055 GJ (one billion BTU) gross heating value of fuel burned during such 24-hour period.
(Amended 8/1/18)
6-1-305 Visible Particles: No person shall emit particles from any operation in sufficient number to cause annoyance to any other person where the particles are large enough to be visible as individual particles at the emission point, or of such size and nature as to be visible individually as incandescent particles. This Section shall only apply if such particles fall on real property other than the property of the person responsible for the emission.
(Amended 8/1/18)
6-1-306 Piledriving Hammers: No person shall emit visible emissions from a piledriving hammer that exceeds the following standards for a period or aggregate periods of more than four minutes during the driving of a single pile:
306.1 For piledriving hammers other than those specified in Section 306.2, any visible emission that is as dark or darker than No. 1 on the Ringelmann Chart, or of such opacity as to obscure an observer's view to an equivalent or greater degree;
306.2 For piledriving hammers utilizing kerosene, smoke suppressing fuel additives and synthetic lubricating oil, and for which fuel usage records are kept as required by Section 6-1-503, any visible emission that is as dark or darker than No. 2 on the Ringelmann Chart or of such opacity as to obscure an observer's view to an equivalent or greater degree.
(Adopted July 11, 1990, Amended 8/1/18)
118 of 1110
Bay Area Air Quality Management District August 1, 2018 6-1-6
6-1-307 Prohibition of Visible Emissions Within and From Regulated Bulk Material Sites:
307.1 Effectve July 1, 2019, the owner/operator of a Regulated Bulk Material Site shall not cause or allow a fugitive dust visible emission from: active operations at the site, a bulk material stockpile, or a bulk material spill that:
a. Exceeds (i) 5 feet long, 5 feet wide, or 5 feet high, and (ii) 10 percent opacity as determined by EPA Method 203B (or half as dark in shade as that designated as Number 1 on the Ringelmann Chart), for a period or aggregate periods of more than 3 minutes in any 60-minute period; or b. Travels or carries beyond the site property line.
307.2 Effective July 1, 2019, the owner/operator of a Regulated Bulk Material Site shall clean up any bulk material spill of more than 12 inches high or more than 25 square feet by the end of the workday, unless the spill is adequately wetted, covered, or is protected by a wind screen with no more than 50 percent porosity that is (i) equal to or higher than the height of the spill; and (ii) placed upwind of the spill at a distance no greater than the height of the wind screen.
Cleanup activities shall not cause fugitive dust visible emissions that exceed 20 percent opacity as determined by EPA Method 203B (or as dark in shade as that designated as Number 1 on the Ringelmann Chart), for a period or aggregate periods of more than 3 minutes in any 60-minute period. (Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-310 Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Concentration Limits:
310.1 No person shall emit TSP from any source in excess of 343 mg per dscm (0.15 gr per dscf) of exhaust gas volume.
310.2 Effective July 1, 2020, Table 6-1-310.2 emission limits shall apply to any source with a Potential To Emit TSP (as defined in Regulation 2-1-217) greater than 1,000 kg per year. No applicable source shall emit TSP at a concentration in excess of the limit indicated for the source’s Exhaust Gas Rate in Table 6- 1-310.2:
Table 6-1-310.2: Exhaust Gas Rate vs. Allowable TSP Concentrations Exhaust Gas Rate TSP Concentration Limit
dscm/min dscf/min mg/dscm gr/dscf
50 or less 1,766 or less 343 0.150
>50 – 75 >1,766 - 2,649 298 0.130
>75 – 100 >2,649 - 3,531 268 0.117
>100 – 150 >3,531 - 5,297 230 0.101
>150 – 200 >5,297 - 7,063 207 0.0903
>200 – 300 >7,063 - 10,594 178 0.0776
>300 – 400 >10,594 - 14,126 159 0.0697
>400 – 500 >14,126 - 17,657 147 0.0641
>500 – 750 >17,657 - 26,486 126 0.0551
>750 - 1,000 >26,486 - 35,315 113 0.0495
>1,000 - 1,500 >35,315 - 52,972 97.3 0.0425
>1,500 - 2,000 >52,972 - 70,629 87.3 0.0382
>2,000 - 3,000 >70,629 - 105,944 75.1 0.0328
>3,000 - 4,000 >105,944 - 141,259 67.4 0.0295
>4,000 - 5,000 >141,259 - 176,573 62.0 0.0271
>5,000 - 7,500 >176,573 - 264,860 53.3 0.0233
>7,500 - 10,000 >264,860 - 353,147 47.8 0.0209
>10,000 - 15,000 >353,147 - 529,720 41.1 0.0180
>15,000 - 20,000 >529,720 - 706,293 36.9 0.0161
>20,000 - 30,000 >706,293 - 1,059,440 31.7 0.0139
119 of 1110
Bay Area Air Quality Management District August 1, 2018 6-1-7
Exhaust Gas Rate TSP Concentration Limit
>30,000 - 40,000 >1,059,440 - 1,412,587 28.5 0.0124
>40,000 - 50,000 >1,412,587 - 1,765,733 26.2 0.0115
>50,000 - 70,000 >1,765,733 - 2,472,027 23.1 0.0101
>70,000 >2,472,027 23.0 0.0100
310.3 For the purposes of Section 6-1-310, the measured concentration of TSP in the exhaust shall be corrected to standard conditions (as defined in Regulation 1-228) and (i) 12 percent carbon dioxide (CO2) by volume, minus water vapor, for incineration or salvage operations and gas-fired pathological waste incinerators; or (ii) 6 percent oxygen (O2) by volume, minus water vapor, for heat transfer operations. In the case of an incineration or salvage operation, the concentration shall be corrected as if no auxiliary fuel had been used and any CO2 produced from combustion of liquid or gaseous fuel shall be excluded from the correction to 12 percent CO2.
(Amended 8/1/18)
6-1-311 Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) Weight Limits:
311.1 No person shall emit TSP from any source at a rate in excess of the limit indicated for the source’s Process Weight Rate in Table 6-1-311.1. This section shall not apply to gas-, liquid- or solid-fuel fired indirect heat exchangers.
Table 6-1-311.1: Process Weight Rate vs. Allowable TSP Emission Limits Process Weight Rate TSP Emission Limit
kg/hour lb/hour kg/hour lb/hour
250 or less 551 or less 0.81 1.78
>250 - 300 >551 - 661 0.91 2.02
>300 - 400 >661 - 882 1.11 2.45
>400 -500 >882 - 1,102 1.29 2.84
>500 - 600 >1,102 - 1,323 1.45 3.21
>600 - 700 >1,323 - 1,543 1.61 3.56
>700 – 800 >1,543 – 1,764 1.76 3.89
>800 – 900 >1,764 – 1,984 1.91 4.21
>900 – 1,000 >1,984 – 2,205 2.05 4.52
>1,000 - 1,200 >2,205 – 2,646 2.31 5.11
>1,200 - 1,400 >2,646 – 3,086 2.56 5.66
>1,400 - 1,600 >3,086 – 3,257 2.80 6.19
>1,600 - 1,800 >3,257 – 3,968 3.03 6.70
>1,800 – 2,000 >3,968 – 4,409 3.26 7.19
>2,000 – 2,500 >4,409 – 5,512 3.78 8.35
>2,500 –3,000 >5,512 – 6,614 4.27 9.43
>3,000 – 3,500 >6,614 – 7,716 4.74 10.5
>3,500 – 4,000 >7,716 – 8,818 5.18 11.4
>4,000 - 4,500 >8,818 – 9,921 5.61 12.4
>4,500 - 5,000 >9,921 - 11,023 6.02 13.3
>5,000 – 6,000 >11,023 - 13,228 6.80 15.0
>6,000 - 7,000 >13,228 - 15,432 7.54 16.6
>7,000 -8,000 >15,432 – 17,637 8.24 18.2
120 of 1110
Bay Area Air Quality Management District August 1, 2018 6-1-8
Process Weight Rate TSP Emission Limit
>8,000 – 9,000 >17,637 – 19,842 8.92 19.7
>9,000 - 10,000 >19,842 – 22,046 9.57 21.1
>10,000 – 12,000 >22,046 - 26,455 10.8 23.9
>12,000 - 14,000 >26,455 - 30,865 12.0 26.5
>14,000 - 16,000 >30,865 - 35,274 13.1 29.0
>16,000 - 18,000 >35,274 – 39,683 14.2 31.3
>18000 - 20,000 >39,683 - 44,092 15.2 33.6
>20,000 - 22,000 >44,092 – 48,502 16.2 35.9
>22,000 - 24,000 >48,502 – 52,911 17.2 38.0
>24,000 - 25,000 >52,911 – 55,116 17.7 39.1
>25,000 >55,116 18.1 40.0
311.2 Effective July 1, 2020, Table 6-1-311.2 emission limits shall apply to any source with a Potential to Emit TSP (as defined in Regulation 2-1-217) greater than 1,000 kg per year. No applicable source shall emit TSP at a rate in excess of the limit indicated for the source’s Process Weight Rate in Table 6-1-311.2:
Table 6-1-311.2: Process Weight Rate vs. Allowable TSP Emission Limits Process Weight Rate TSP Emission Limit
kg/hour lb/hour kg/hour lb/hour
100 or less 220 or less 0.45 0.99
>100 - 150 >220 - 331 0.59 1.29
>150 - 200 >331 - 441 0.70 1.55
>200 - 300 >441 - 661 0.90 1.98
>300 - 400 >661 - 882 1.06 2.34
>400 -500 >882 - 1,102 1.21 2.67
>500 - 750 >1,102 - 1,653 1.52 3.34
>750 – 1,000 >1,653 - 2,205 1.78 3.92
>1,000 – 1,500 >2,205 - 3,307 2.21 4.86
>1,500 - 2,000 >3,307 - 4,409 2.56 5.65
>2,000 - 3,000 >4,409 - 6,614 3.15 6.95
>3,000 - 4,000 >6,614 - 8,818 3.64 8.02
>4,000 - 5,000 >8,818 - 11,023 4.06 8.95
>5,000 - 7,500 >11,023 - 16,535 4.96 10.9
>7,500 - 10,000 >16,535 - 22,046 5.44 12.0
>10,000 - 15,000 >22,046 - 33,069 6.00 13.2
>15000 - 20,000 >33,069 - 44,092 6.40 14.1
>20,000 - 30,000 >44,092 - 66,139 7.04 15.5
>30,000 - 40,000 >66,139 - 88,185 7.53 16.6
>40,000 - 50,000 >88,185 - 110,231 7.93 17.5
>50,000 - 75,000 >110,231 - 165,347 8.71 19.2
>75,000 - 100,000 >165,347 - 220,462 9.33 20.6
>100,000 - 150,000 >220,462 - 330,693 10.3 22.6
>150,000 - 200,000 >330,693 - 440,925 11.0 24.2
>200,000 - 300,000 >440,925 - 661,387 12.1 26.6
121 of 1110
Bay Area Air Quality Management District August 1, 2018 6-1-9
>300,000 - 400,000 >661,387 - 881,849 12.9 28.5
>400,000 >881,849 13.6 30.0
(Amended 8/1/18)
6-1-320 Sulfuric Acid Manufacturing Plants: A person shall not emit from any operation manufacturing sulfuric acid using as a principal raw material any sulfur-containing material, any emission having a concentration of SO3 or H2SO4, or both, converted to and quantified as 100% H2SO4, exceeding 92 mg per dscm (0.04 gr/dscf) of exhaust gas volume.
(Amended 8/1/18)
6-1-330 Sulfur Recovery Units: A person shall not emit from any operation manufacturing sulfur, using as a principal raw material any sulfur-containing material, any emission having a concentration of SO3 or H2SO4, or both, converted to and quantified as 100% H2SO4, exceeding 183 mg per dscm (0.08 gr/dscf) of exhaust gas volume. (Amended 8/1/18)
6-1-400 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
6-1-401 Appearance of Emissions: Persons subject to this Rule are subject to and shall comply with the requirements of Regulation 6-102.
(Amended 8/1/18)
6-1-402 Alternate Source Test Frequency: The APCO may authorize a person to reduce the frequency of source tests required in Section 6-1-504 or 505 if at least three (3) consecutive prior source test results indicate compliance with the applicable standard.
To apply for such authorization, a person subject to Section 6-1-504 or 505 must submit a request in writing to the Director of Compliance and Enforcement and Manager of Source Test indicating (i) the name of the person requesting the reduction, (ii) the site number of the site for which the reduction is sought, (iii) the source number of the source for which the reduction is sought, (iv) the pollutant for which the reduction is sought; and (iv) the results of prior source tests demonstrating compliance with the regulatory standard involved. The APCO shall approve or deny the reduction in frequency of source tests under this provision within 180 days of receipt of the written request.
(Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-500 MONITORING AND RECORDS
6-1-501 Sampling Facilities and Instruments Required: As described in Regulation 6-501, persons subject to this Rule are subject to, and shall provide sampling facilities and install instruments as required by, the provisions of Regulation 1. (Amended 8/1/18)
6-1-502 Data, Records and Reporting: As described in Regulation 6-502, persons monitoring emissions in accordance with the requirements of Regulation 1 shall keep records, report emission excesses and provide summaries of data collected as required by Regulation 1.
(Amended 8/1/18)
6-1-503 Records: In order to be eligible for the Ringelmann No. 2 limitation set forth in Section 6-1-306.2, the person responsible for the operation of a pile-driving hammer must maintain and have available for inspection records that establish the use of kerosene, smoke suppressing fuel additives and synthetic lubricating oil. (Adopted 7/11/90, Amended 8/1/18)
6-1-504 Demonstration of Total Suspended Particles (TSP) Compliance: Effective July 1, 2019, the owner/operator of a source with a District permit to operate and with a Potential To Emit TSP (as defined in Regulation 2-1-217) of greater than 2,000 kg per year shall conduct source testing to demonstrate compliance with Section 6-1-310 and 311 according to the testing frequencies listed in Table 6-1-504, unless the owner/operator receives written approval from the APCO for a different testing frequency, as described in Section 6-1-402. Inactive permitted sources are not required to conduct compliance source testing until they become active by operating more than 90 days in a calendar year and must conduct a source test within six months 122 of 1110
Bay Area Air Quality Management District August 1, 2018 6-1-10
of becoming active. Source tests required under this section shall be conducted in accordance with Section 6-1-602.1.
Table 6-1-504: Required Compliance Test Frequencies
Potential to Emit
TSP (kg/year)
Compliance
Test
Frequency
Minimum Time
Between Tests
Maximum Time
Between Tests
> 16,000 Annually 9 months 15 months
> 8,000 – 16,000 Biennially 18 months 30 months
> 2,000 – 8,000 Every five
years
48 months 72 months
(Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-505 Demonstration of SO3 and Sulfuric Acid Mist Compliance: Effective July 1, 2019, the owner/operator of a source with a District permit to operate and with a Potential to Emit SO3 and H2SO4 (as defined in Regulation 2-1-217), converted to and quantified as 100 percent H2SO4, greater than 2,000 kg per year shall conduct source testing to demonstrate compliance with Section 6-1-320 or 330 according to the testing frequencies listed in Table 6-1-505, unless the owner/operator receives written approval from the APCO for a different testing frequency, as described in Section 6-1- 402. Inactive permitted sources are not required to conduct compliance source testing until they become active by operating more than 90 days in a calendar year and must conduct a source test within six months of becoming active. Source tests required under this section shall be conducted in accordance with Section 6-1-602.2.
Table 6-1-505: Required Compliance Test Frequencies
Potential to Emit
SO3 and H2SO4
(kg/year)
Compliance
Test
Frequency
Minimum Time
Between Tests
Maximum Time
Between Tests
> 16,000 Annually 9 months 15 months
> 8,000 – 16,000 Biennially 18 months 30 months
> 2,000 – 8,000 Every five
years
48 months 72 months
(Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-506 Monitoring and Recordkeeping at Regulated Bulk Material Sites: The owner/operator of any Regulated Bulk Material Site shall monitor sources and operations at the site subject to the requirements in Section 6-1-307 as follows:
506.1 Monitor the nature and extent of any fugitive dust visible emissions from each source or operation, using simple observation of the source or operation with the sun or light positioned behind the observer, at times when the potential for fugitive dust visible emissions is at its highest due to wind conditions and/or work activities, or as otherwise specified by the APCO, according to the following frequencies:
a. For any source or operation with the potential to generate fugitive dust located within 1000 feet of the site property line on a workday when the wind is blowing from the source toward the property line, at least twice during each such workday;
b. For all sources and operations with the potential to generate fugitive dust, at least once during each workday.
c. Monitoring of petroleum coke, calcined coke, or coal operations are required during daylight hours only.
506.2 Document the sources and operations monitored each workday when active material handling and storage operations occur.
506.3 Maintain records required by Section 6-1-506.2 for two years, in electronic, paper hard copy or log book format, and make these records available to the APCO upon request.
(Adopted 8/1/18)
123 of 1110
Bay Area Air Quality Management District August 1, 2018 6-1-11
6-1-600 MANUAL OF PROCEDURES
6-1-601 Applicability of Test Methods: The common test methods cited in Regulation 6 shall apply to this Rule, including the methods cited in Regulation 6-601: Assessment of Visible Emissions, and Regulation 6-602: Assessment of Opacity. (Adopted 8/1/18)
6-1-602 Methods for Determining Compliance: Compliance testing required by Sections 6- 1-504 and 505 shall be based on the following test methods:
602.1 Total Suspended Particulate: Source tests to determine compliance with TSP emissions limits shall be conducted in accordance with EPA Method 5, or an alternate method as described in Regulation 6-603. Source tests are not required if sources cannot be modified to comply with source test requirements and testing is not physically possible (e.g., for sources without a defined stack). 602.2 SO3 and Sulfuric Acid Mist: Source tests to determine compliance with SO3 and H2SO4 emission limits shall be conducted in accordance with EPA Method 8 or an EPA and APCO approved alternative. Source tests are not required if sources cannot be modified to comply with source test requirements and testing is not physically possible (e.g., for sources without a defined stack). (Adopted 8/1/18)
124 of 1110
Exhibit D
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
MINIMUM SCOPE OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office (ISO) Form CG 00 01 12 07 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products-completed operations, personal & advertising injury, with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
2. Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Contractor has no owned autos, hired, (Code 8) and non-owned autos (Code 9), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Workers’ Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
4. Sexual Abuse or Molestation (SAM) Liability: If the work will include contact with minors, and the CGL policy referenced above is not endorsed to include affirmative coverage for sexual abuse or molestation, Contractor shall obtain and maintain a policy covering Sexual Abuse and Molestation with a limit no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim.
If the contractor maintains higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits maintained by the contractor.
Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
Additional Insured Status
The City, its elected and appointed officials, employees, and agents are to be covered as insureds on the auto policy for liability arising out of automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by or on behalf of the Contractor; and on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10, 11 85 or both CG 20 10 and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used).
Primary Coverage
For any claims related to this contract, the Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its elected and appointed officials, employees, and agents. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its elected and appointed officials, employees, or agents shall be excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. 125 of 1110
Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice (10 days for non-payment) has been given to the City.
Waiver of Subrogation
Contractor hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.
Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to effect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Contractor to purchase coverage with a lower deductible or retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention.
Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.
126 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Agenda Report
City Hall
330 W. 20th Avenue
San Mateo CA 94403
www.cityofsanmateo.org
Agenda Number: 15 Section Name: CONSENT CALENDAR Account Number: 10-2011 File ID: 26-10824 TO: City Council
FROM: Alex Khojikian, City Manager
PREPARED BY: Finance Department
MEETING DATE: January 26, 2026
SUBJECT:
Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025 — Approval RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 BACKGROUND:
The City’s Charter, Section 5.26 requires that the City’s external auditor conduct an annual audit, and the City issue a complete set of financial statements within a reasonable timeframe following the end of the fiscal year. The Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, included as Attachment 1, contains the results of the external audit and the financial statements for the City and its component units.
The City's independent auditor, The Pun Group, a firm of licensed certified public accountants, conducts its audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS). The standards require that the auditors plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. On a sample basis, they examine evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall basic financial statement presentation.
The auditor has rendered an unmodified (“clean”) opinion on the City's basic financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025.
ACFR - Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Governmental Accounting Standards require a Management’s Discussion and Analysis (referred to as MD&A) to be included with the audited financial statements, with the intent of giving readers an objective and easily readable analysis of the City’s financial performance for the year. The MD&A includes a discussion of the basic financial statements, some condensed financial information, an analysis of the City’s financial position, and results of operations on both a City-wide and Fund basis. The MD&A begins on page 5 of the ACFR.
ACFR - Financial Results by Fund
The Fund Financial Statements section, which can be found on pages 37 through 52 of the financial report, presents financial data for the City's major funds, most notably the General Fund.
General Fund
The General Fund serves as the City’s primary operating fund. In FY 2024-25, it recorded $179.1 million in revenues, $176.6 million in expenditures, and $1 million in other financing uses, leading to a modest net gain of $1.5 million. As a result, the General Fund‘s total fund balance increased to $119.5 million. Below are some key financial highlights for the General 127 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
Fund:
General Fund revenues totaled $179.1 million, reflecting a $9.0 million increase (5.3 %) from the prior year. The growth in revenue is mainly due to the increases in property tax and real property transfer tax which helped offset decreases in other tax revenues.
• Property tax remained the City’s largest revenue source, generating $83.6 million, up $5 million from the prior fiscal year. Secured property tax continued to grow in FY 24-25 and the City received its full allocation of the FY 22- 23 shortfall in Vehicle License Fee (VLF) in-lieu property tax revenue. • Sales tax, the City’s second largest revenue, decreased by $0.7 million (2.5 %) to $27.1 million. The decrease was primarily due to reduced allocation from the County pool. • Real Property Transfer Tax (RPTT), part of Other taxes, generated $17.2 million in FY 24-25, an increase of $8.6 million from the year prior. This includes a $3.3 million increase in traditional RPTT and a $5.3 million increase in the voter approved Measure CC revenues from the prior year. • Additional Other taxes, primarily consisting of Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), business tax, and franchise fees; totaled $15.4 million and were down $1.8 million from the prior year.
General Fund expenditures totaled $176.6 million, reflecting an increase of $19.0 million (12.1 %) compared to the previous year. The increase was due to a number of factors including $9.1 million in increased expenses due to the inception of new lease liabilities per GASB 87. The lease liabilities expenses were balanced out by an increase within Other Financing Sources and did not affect the General Fund‘s fund balance. In addition, General Fund expenditures increased due to negotiated labor cost increases and rising operating expenses such as higher costs for contract services. Overall, General Fund spending was $4.2 million under budget for FY 2024-25. The favorable budget variance was largely due to vacancy savings.
The General Fund balance increased to $119.5 million due to a net gain of $1.5 million. From an accounting perspective, the City ended FY 2024-25 with a surplus. However, even though the audited financial statements reflect a surplus year, our budgetary outlook tells a different story. When reviewing available resources for spending, the City is actually facing a $2.9 million deficit due to the following factors:
• $3.3 million in mark-to-market unrealized gains were recorded as investment earnings but represent non-cash accounting adjustments to meet the Accounting Standards. They are not spendable funds. • $1.2 million in unspent Measure S funds (Measure S is a General Fund sub-fund) were budgeted for CIP but not yet transferred out from Measure S fund to the CIP fund.
These funds are not available for general operating needs. This distinction between accounting results and budgetary resources is critical for financial planning. While the audit confirms the City financial statements are accurate and presented fairly, our budgeting decisions must reflect the actual resources available for operations. As we continue to manage the current fiscal year budget and prepare for the next budget cycle, we will need to continue to address the budget deficit strategically.
Other Major Funds
At the close of FY 2024-25, the General Capital Projects Fund reported a fund balance of $54.7 million, down by $4.1 million (7.0 %) from the prior year. The fund incurred $34.1 million in capital project expenditures, underscoring the City’s continued investments in our facilities and infrastructure. Project investments included $11.9 million for the citywide street rehabilitation and reconstruction program, $3.2 million for storm and flood control improvements, $4.3 million for parks projects, and $14.7 million for city facilities and technology upgrades.
Proprietary Funds
Proprietary Funds are used to account for activities that are fueled by charges for the services provided by each fund.
Enterprise Funds account for external activities (largely utilities), while Internal Service Funds (ISFs) account for internal (interdepartmental) activities.
The Sewer Fund is the City’s largest enterprise fund and should be self-supporting. Service charges to sewer customers generate the revenues needed to support the enterprise’s operations, debt service, and capital needs. • The Sewer Fund’s unrestricted net position was $222.5 million, an increase of $38.2 million or 20.7 %, largely 128 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
driven by the approved rate increase of 3 % for fiscal year 2024-5 and capital contributions for the capital improvement projects of the wastewater treatment plant.
• Cash and investments increased from $133.4 million to $260.3 million, mainly due to proceeds from the new loan from the Clean Water Revolving Fund Loan with the State Water Resources. Increases in investment income, charges for services, and capital contributions were also significant drivers behind the healthy cash position, which is intentional to provide strong liquidity during the construction phase of the Clean Water Program, as well as a robust debt coverage ratio consistent with the Sewer enterprise’s AA credit rating. • Total revenues for the Sewer Fund were $86.1 million, while total expenditures amounted to $35.1 million.
The Storm Fund is the City’s newest enterprise fund. In January 2024, property owners voted to approve the Community Flood and Storm Protection Fee Ballot Measure. This measure allowed the City Council to levy stormwater fees starting in fiscal year 2024-25.
• The unrestricted net position of the Storm Fund at the end of the fiscal year was $3.2 million, primarily from fee revenue.
• Total revenues for the Storm Fund were $3.9 million, while total expenditures amounted to $0.7 million.
ACFR – Government-Wide Financial Statements
The government-wide financial statements provide a comprehensive, long-term overview of a government entity’s overall financial position and operations. They focus on the economic resources of the entity as a whole. These financial statements report not only the City’s current assets and current liabilities, but also its long-term assets and liabilities, such as unfunded pension liabilities. The government-wide financial statements can be found on pages 28 through 31 of the financial report.
Statement of Net Position
The Statement of Net Position primarily presents the City's balance sheet-type accounts: assets and deferred outflows of resources (expenditures that apply to a future period), liabilities and deferred inflows of resources (revenues that apply to a future period), and the net of the former and latter categories, reported as net position.
As of June 30, 2025, the City's entity-wide net position totaled $947.3 million, reflecting an increase of $91.5 million from the prior year. This is due to total revenues of $355.9 million exceeding total expenditures $264.4 million.
City Council Audit Committee
At the City Council Audit Committee Special Meeting on January 14, the City’s independent auditor presented to the Committee members, the Mayor and Deputy Mayor, the results of the audit and other required communications. After the review, the Committee recommended that the City Council accept and approve the year-end financial reports for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025.
BUDGET IMPACT:
The recommended action has no budget impact.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:
This Annual Comprehensive Financial Report is not a project subject to CEQA, because it is an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).)
NOTICE PROVIDED
All meeting noticing requirements were met.
ATTACHMENTS
Att 1 – Annual Comprehensive Financial Report - Fiscal Year 2024-25 129 of 1110
CITY OF SAN MATEO
STAFF CONTACT
Abby Veeser, Finance Director
[email protected]
(650) 522-7102
130 of 1110
Annual
Comprehensive
Financial
Report
CITY OF SAN MATEO
YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2025
131 of 1110
132 of 1110
City of San Mateo
San Mateo, California
Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
For the Year Ended June 30, 2025
Prepared by
Finance Department
133 of 1110
134 of 1110
City of San Mateo
Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
For the Year Ended June 30, 2025
Table of Contents
i
Page
INTRODUCTORY SECTION (Unaudited)
Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................ i Letter of Transmittal ................................................................................................................................................... v Directory of City Officials ........................................................................................................................................xiv Map of City’s Location .............................................................................................................................................xv Organizational Chart .................................................................................................................................................xvi GFOA Certificate of Excellence in Financial Reporting ...........................................................................................xvii
FINANCIAL SECTION
Independent Auditor’s Report ................................................................................................................................ 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis – Required Supplementary Information (Unaudited) ...................... 5 Basic Financial Statements:
Government-Wide Financial Statements:
Statement of Net Position ............................................................................................................................ 28 Statement of Activities ................................................................................................................................ 30 Fund Financial Statements:
Governmental Funds Financial Statements:
Balance Sheet ........................................................................................................................................ 37 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet
to the Government-Wide Statement of Net Position ...................................................................... 38 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances ............................................... 39 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances to the Government-Wide Statement of Activities and Changes in Net Position ..................................................................... 40 Proprietary Funds Financial Statements:
Statement of Net Position ..................................................................................................................... 43 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position .......................................................... 45 Statement of Cash Flows ...................................................................................................................... 46 Fiduciary Funds Financial Statements:
Statement of Fiduciary Net Position ..................................................................................................... 51 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position .................................................................................. 52 Notes to the Basic Financial Statements ........................................................................................................ 59 135 of 1110
City of San Mateo
Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
For the Year Ended June 30, 2025
Table of Contents (Continued)
ii
Page
FINANCIAL SECTION (Continued)
Required Supplementary Information (Unaudited):
Budgetary Information ..................................................................................................................................... 127 Budgetary Comparison Schedules:
General Fund ............................................................................................................................................. 128 Schedule of Changes in the Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios ............................................................ 130 Schedules of Contributions - Pension .............................................................................................................. 134 Schedule of Changes in Total OPEB Liability and Related Ratios ................................................................. 136 Schedule of Contributions – OPEB ................................................................................................................. 137 Supplementary Information:
Non-Major Governmental Funds:
Combining Balance Sheet ......................................................................................................................... 142 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances ................................................................................................................................. 147 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balances – Budget and Actual Schedules:
Police Grants Special Revenue Fund .................................................................................................. 152 Community Development Block Grant Special Revenue Fund ......................................................... 153 HOME Special Revenue Fund ............................................................................................................ 154 City Housing Special Revenue Fund .................................................................................................. 155 Low and Moderate Income Housing Special Revenue Fund .............................................................. 156 Permanent Local Housing Allocation Special Revenue Fund ............................................................ 157 Gas Tax Special Revenue Fund .......................................................................................................... 158 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Special Revenue Fund ........................................................... 159 Advance Planning Special Revenue Fund .......................................................................................... 160 Solid Waste Special Revenue Fund .................................................................................................... 161 Parks and Recreation Special Revenue Fund ...................................................................................... 162 Traffic Impact Fee Special Revenue Fund .......................................................................................... 163 Commercial Linkage Fee Special Revenue Fund ............................................................................... 164 Construction Services Special Revenue Fund .................................................................................... 165 Landfill Bonds Debt Service Fund ..................................................................................................... 166 General Obligation Bonds Debt Service Fund .................................................................................... 167 2% Hotel Tax Capital Projects Fund .................................................................................................. 168 Internal Service Funds:
Combining Statement of Net Position ....................................................................................................... 170 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position ........................................... 172 Combining Statement of Cash Flows ........................................................................................................ 174 136 of 1110
City of San Mateo
Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
For the Year Ended June 30, 2025
Table of Contents (Continued)
iii
Page
FINANCIAL SECTION (Continued)
Supplementary Information (Continued):
Fiduciary Funds:
Custodial Funds - Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position ......................................................... 181 Custodial Funds - Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position ...................................... 182 Private Purpose Trust Funds - Combining Statement of Fiduciary Net Position ...................................... 185 Private Purpose Trust Funds - Combining Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position ................... 186
General Capital Projects Fund:
Schedule of Assessments and Impact Fees and Related Expenditures ..................................................... 189
STATISTICAL SECTION (Unaudited)
Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................................... 193 Financial Trends:
Net Position by Component – Last Ten Fiscal Years ...................................................................................... 194 Changes in Net Position – Last Ten Fiscal Years ............................................................................................ 196 Governmental Activities Tax Revenues by Source – Last Ten Fiscal Years .................................................. 201 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds – Last Ten Fiscal Years .................................................................... 202 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds – Last Ten Fiscal Years ................................................. 204 Revenue Capacity:
Assessed Value and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property – Last Ten Fiscal Years ........................... 206 Principal Property Taxpayers – Current Year and Nine Years Ago ................................................................ 207 Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates – Last Ten Fiscal Years ............................................................. 208 Property Tax Levies and Collections – Last Ten Fiscal Years ........................................................................ 209 Debt Capacity:
Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type – Last Ten Fiscal Years ......................................................................... 210 Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding – Last Ten Fiscal Years ............................................................ 212 Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt ................................................................................... 213 Legal Debt Margin Information – Last Ten Fiscal Years ................................................................................ 214 Pledged-Revenue Coverage – Last Ten Fiscal Years ...................................................................................... 216 Demographic and Economic Information:
Demographic and Economic Statistics – Last Ten Fiscal Years ..................................................................... 217 Principal Employers – Current Year and Nine Years Ago .............................................................................. 218 137 of 1110
City of San Mateo
Annual Comprehensive Financial Report
For the Year Ended June 30, 2025
Table of Contents (Continued)
iv
Page
STATISTICAL SECTION (Unaudited) (Continued)
Operating Information:
Full Time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function – Last Ten Fiscal Years ............................. 219 Operating Indicators by Function – Last Ten Fiscal Years ............................................................................. 220 Capital Asset Statistics by Function – Last Ten Fiscal Years .......................................................................... 221 138 of 1110
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
v
Finance Department
330 West 20th Avenue
San Mateo, California 94403
p: 650.522.7100
http://www.cityofsanmateo.org
January 6, 2026
Residents of the City of San Mateo,
Honorable Mayor, and
Honorable Members of the City Council
We are pleased to submit the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for the City of San Mateo, California, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. This financial report contains a complete set of audited financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) as promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB).
This report consists of management’s representations concerning the finances of the City and its blended component unit. Responsibility for both the accuracy of the data and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the management of the City. To provide a reasonable basis for making those representations, management of the City has established a comprehensive internal control framework that is designed to both protect the government’s assets from loss, theft, or misuse and to compile sufficient reliable information for the preparation of the City’s financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The first note in the Notes to the Financial Statements provides a detailed explanation of the City’s significant accounting policies. Because the cost of internal controls should not outweigh their benefits, the City’s comprehensive framework of internal controls has been designed to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements will be free from material misstatement. As management, we assert that, to the best of our knowledge and belief, this financial report is complete and reliable in all material respects.
The City’s Charter, Section 5.26, requires an annual audit of the basic financial statements of the City.
The Pun Group, a firm of licensed certified public accountants, has audited the City’s financial statements. The goal of the independent audit is to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements of the City and its blended component unit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025, are free of material misstatement. The audit involved examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements; assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management; and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. The independent auditors concluded, based upon the audit, that there was a reasonable basis for rendering an unmodified (“clean”) opinion on the City’s basic financial statements as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025. The independent auditors’ report is presented as the first component of the financial section of this report.
The analysis of the financial condition and the result of operations are in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) section immediately following the auditor’s report. This transmittal letter is designed to complement the MD&A and should be read in conjunction with it. 139 of 1110
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
vi
THE REPORT
The ACFR is presented in three sections:
The Introduction section includes this letter of transmittal, City Council introduction, the City’s organizational chart, and certificates of achievement.
The Financial section includes the report of the independent auditors; Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A); the basic financial statements, including the government-wide financial statements; and the accompanying notes to the financial statements. The Financial section also includes the fund financial statements, including the governmental funds financial statements, the proprietary funds financial statements, the fiduciary funds financial statements, and the combining individual funds financial statements for the non-major governmental funds and the internal service funds. Required supplementary information is also included in the financial section. The Statistical section includes selected financial and demographic information, presented on a multi-year basis.
ACFR Organization
This ACFR includes all funds of the City and the City’s component unit, which is a legally separate organization for which the City is financially accountable or whose relationship with the City is of a nature and significance that would cause the City’s financial statements to be incomplete were it not included.
In addition to the financial audit, the City typically undertakes a single audit in conformance with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and the Uniform Guidance. 140 of 1110
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
vii
CITY PROFILE
The City of San Mateo is in San Mateo County and is situated 19 miles south of San Francisco and 30 miles north of San Jose. The City covers an area of 15.4 square miles and includes tidelands from the Bay to the east and coastal mountains to the west. With its Mediterranean climate, residents enjoy warm, sunny summers and mild damp winters, ideal for various recreational activities in the City’s many neighborhoods and regional parks.
One of the larger suburbs of the San Francisco Peninsula, San Mateo is bordered by the cities of Burlingame to the north, Foster City to the east, Belmont to the south, and Hillsborough to the west.
According to the State Department of Finance, the City San Mateo had an estimated population of 104,315 on January 1, 2025, making it the largest city in San Mateo County
CITY HISTORY
The first inhabitants of what is now the City of San Mateo were members of a tribe of the Ohlone Indians (called Coastanoans by Spanish explorers). This Tribe lived in the area from South San Francisco to Belmont for at least 4,000 years before explorers first arrived on the Peninsula. In 1776, Spanish explorers came to today's San Mateo. During a scouting trip to locate a place to start a colony on the Peninsula, Lieutenant Colonel Juan Bautista de Anza, Padre Pedro Font, Lieutenant Jose Joaquin Moraga, and eleven soldiers set up camp in San Mateo. Father Font named the creek that they slept by "San Mateo Creek." In 1793, the mission fathers in San Francisco created an outpost of the mission on the Peninsula. The outpost was the first building built in San Mateo by non-natives.
In 1822, California received word of Mexico's
independence from Spanish rule. The Mexican Land
Grants (1835) would leave a few residents owning vast
expanses of land in the area. These ranches were so large that what is now the City of San Mateo is comprised of
only two land grants - Rancho San Mateo and Rancho de
las Pulgas. The year 1889 saw many important events in
the developing San Mateo community. Under head
engineer, Herman Schussler, the Crystal Springs dam was completed. The completion of this project assured that the people of San Mateo would have quality drinking water,
allowing for further growth in the area.
In the same year, William Howard had part of his estate opened for subdivision, the first successful attempt at selling smaller plots of land. With this, the middle class moved to San Mateo. In this same year, Richard H. Jury and Charles N. Kirkbride established the “Leader”, San Mateo's first successful newspaper and one of the earliest proponents of the incorporation of San Mateo. On September 3, 1894, with a vote of 150 in favor and 25 against incorporation, San Mateo became a town.
CITY ORGANIZATION
The City was incorporated in 1894 and was originally chartered in 1922. The current charter was adopted in 1971 and revised in 2002. Since 2002, there have been three other voter-approved amendments to the charter. San Mateo has a Council-Manager form of government. Five Council members each serve for four-year terms. The City completed a transition from at-large elections to district elections, starting with the November 2022 election, where three of the five districts were open, and finishing in the November 2024 election where the remaining two districts were open. 141 of 1110
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
viii
The Council selects a Mayor from among its members each December for a one-year term. The City Manager is appointed by the Council and serves as chief executive officer responsible for the day-today administration of City affairs. The City Council also appoints a City Attorney. There are twelve Advisory Boards and Commissions, nine of which are appointed by the City Council.
The City provides a wide range of municipal services, including police, public works, parks and recreation, library, planning and zoning, building, sewer enterprise, street maintenance, economic development, and general administrative services. The City is part of a joint powers agreement with the cities of Belmont and Foster City that provides fire services to all three cities through the San Mateo Consolidated Fire Department. The City offers 35 parks, six recreation centers, an 18-hole golf course, and three libraries, including a state-of-the-art main library. California Water Service, a private company, provides water to City residents.
The City has an Audit Committee consisting of the Mayor and Deputy Mayor. The Audit Committee is responsible for the selection and management of the external auditor. The Audit Committee discusses any matters related to the audit with the external auditor and accepts the results of the annual financial audit.
BUDGET PROCESS
The City operates on a two-year budget cycle. The two-year budget process requires that each department submit two one-year expenditure plans and revenue estimates to the City Council for approval. In each alternate year, the department directors present mid-cycle performance reports to the City Manager and City Council summarizing budget status to date and seeking approval for yeartwo funding. The City utilizes a five-year plan for capital improvements. The plan serves as a guide for allocation of future resources.
The City maintains budgetary controls that have the objective of ensuring compliance with legal provisions embodied in the annual appropriated budget submitted by the City Manager and adopted by the City Council. The annual operating budget and the long-term capital improvement plan are adopted on or before June 30th each year by City Council. All budget amendments require City Council approval. The two-year business plan for operations is adopted in June of every even-numbered year and is amended in the second year of the plan as part of the annual budget development process.
Budgetary control (the level at which expenditures and encumbrances cannot legally exceed the appropriated amount) is established at the department level within individual funds. Departmental operating budgets may be reallocated among programs within a department and within the same fund, but expenditures may not exceed annually budgeted appropriations at the department/fund level without Council approval. Project-length budgets are adopted for the General Fund, some special revenue funds, and all capital project funds. Capital improvement expenditures may not exceed budgeted amounts without Council approval.
LOCAL AND REGIONAL ECONOMY
The information presented in the financial statements is perhaps best understood when it is considered from a broader perspective of the specific environment in which the City operates. The City is one of the major centers of economic activity in San Mateo County, serving as a business, recreational, educational, and cultural hub. The diverse economy of San Mateo includes a strong employment base in the technology, health care, financial services, government, and retail fields. 142 of 1110
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
ix
Companies based in San Mateo include Franklin Templeton, Roblox, SurveyMonkey, GoPro, and Verkada. These companies contribute significantly to the City's employment base and economic vitality.
The City has a vibrant and pedestrian-friendly downtown that fosters small businesses and community events, enhancing its cultural appeal. Additionally, the Hillsdale Shopping Center and Bridgepointe Shopping Center offer unique retail and entertainment experiences, attracting visitors from the region, boosting local commerce.
Real Estate Market
San Mateo's real estate market has been a key driver of economic growth, showing consistent strength.
Over the past 12 years, including the pandemic period, property assessed values have steadily increased. According to the San Mateo County Assessor's Office, the City's total property assessed value for fiscal year 2024-25 reached $38.1 billion—a 4.8% increase from the previous year. This growth reflects ongoing demand for residential and commercial properties in the area.
At the same time, changing economic conditions and uncertainty in the economy have introduced new challenges. In response to high inflation, the Federal Reserve (Fed) implemented a series of interest rate hikes over the past few years, raising the Federal Funds Rate. Consequently, average 30-year mortgage rates reached recent highs of 6.75-7.5%. The high borrowing costs cooled the real estate market.
Although inflation is easing and there have been some rate cuts, the Fed continues to take a methodical approach to rate cuts given the uncertainty around tariffs and the weakening job market. It is unknown whether the Fed will continue to make rate cuts in 2026 and borrowing costs may still remain high.
Chart 1 – 30 Year Fixed Rate Mortgage Average
Although many uncertainties remain, the housing market is stabilizing, and San Mateo’s median home price in late 2025 was $2.15 million, slightly down from a year ago, but still very strong and supported by continued demand and limited housing supply.
143 of 1110
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
x
Chart 2 – Real Estate Metrics – Single Family Residential, City of San Mateo Source of information: San Mateo County Association of Realtors Labor Market
San Mateo's labor market remains robust although there are signs of weakening in the labor market.
As of September 2025, the City's unemployment rate stood at 3.9%, up slightly from 3.5% in September 2024. The City’s rate was close to San Mateo County’s rate (4%) and was better than the State’s rate (5.6%). Nationally, the U.S. unemployment rate stood at 4.4% in September 2025, a modest uptick from the prior year. The data presents mixed signals for the broader economy, suggesting that while our regional economy is strong and unemployment still low, certain sectors may be slowing down.
Chart 3 – Unemployment Rates
Impact on City’s Financial Sustainability
While the City's economy remains strong, several factors could pose challenges ahead such as higher interest rates could continue to strain the housing market, potentially affecting property tax and real property transfer tax revenues; changing retail trends could reduce sales tax revenues; and rising labor and operational costs could impact the City's ability to sustain service levels. In the next few years, an increase in housing development is expected in the City, which should improve property tax revenues, but could also impact other revenue sources, potentially negatively, such as sales tax and transient occupancy tax revenues. We will continue to closely monitor these changing economic conditions to ensure course corrections to the long-term financial sustainability plan are made as necessary. $-
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
0 50
100
150
200
250
2021
Q1
2021
Q2
2021
Q3
2021
Q4
2022
Q1
2022
Q2
2022
Q3
2022
Q4
2023
Q1
2023
Q2
2023
Q3
2023
Q4
2024
Q1
2024
Q2
2024
Q3
2024
Q4
2025
Q1
2025
Q2
2025
Q3
Millions
Median Sales Price Sold Average Days on Market
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
State of California 5.4 4.5 4.0 3.7 9.9 6.3 3.8 4.8 5.2 5.6 County of San Mateo 3.3 2.8 2.3 2.0 8 4.1 2.3 3.4 3.6 4.0 City of San Mateo 3.2 2.7 2.2 1.9 6.9 3.7 2.2 3.4 3.5 3.9
0.0 2.0
4.0 6.0
8.0 10.0
12.0 %
Unemployment
144 of 1110
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
xi
CITY FINANCIAL POLICIES & PLAN
Formal financial policies and prudent operating practices have enabled the City to maintain core services and minimize the impact of economic fluctuations on residents as much as possible. Formal policies exist in areas such as balanced budgets, revenue diversification, operating expenditures, reserves, investments, and debt.
Trust has been built over the years between the City and the community through establishing and following formal financial policies, as well as maintaining prudent operating practices. This trust and confidence were demonstrated by the voters in San Mateo, who in November 2009 approved a ¼ cent general sales tax. With this tax set to expire in April 2018, the voters again demonstrated their confidence in the City’s financial management by voting in November 2015 to approve Measure S to extend the sales tax until 2048 to fund critical infrastructure and enhancements to public safety services.
In addition, San Mateo voters again demonstrated their trust by approving Measure CC in November 2022 to increase the real property transfer tax from 0.5% to 1.5% for properties sold or transferred that are valued at $10 million or more.
REVENUE ADMINISTRATION
The City’s two main sources of revenue to fund operating expenditures are property and sales taxes, which make up over 62 percent of total General Fund revenues. In addition, the City’s revenue administration includes a review of all fees, fines, and charges for services to ensure the charges are meeting cost-recovery goals. One-time and unpredictable revenues are spent on one-time expenditures, such as equipment replacement, or transferred to capital improvement funds for repair and rehabilitation projects.
EXPENDITURE ADMINISTRATION
City departments and the Finance Department carefully review expenditure budgets. The department directors are responsible for containing expenditures within their Council-approved budget appropriations. The City maintains an encumbrance accounting system as an additional means of budgetary control. Encumbered amounts in the operating budget lapse one year after the end of the fiscal year.
RESERVES
The General Fund Reserve Policy has been amended and is incorporated into the adopted fiscal year 2025-26 Annual Budget as summarized here. A Contingency Reserve will be maintained at 15% of the General Fund budgeted operational expenditures. Per the most recent Housing Element language, 20% of RDA residual property tax will be allocated annually to the Housing Set-Aside Reserve at the discretion of the City Council. A Budget Stabilization Reserve will be set at 15% of the General Fund budgeted revenues. Finally, a Pension Stabilization Reserve has also been established to mitigate impacts of rising pension costs and prevent unexpected increases in unfunded pension liabilities from affecting city services.
Overall, the General Fund Reserve was healthy as of June 30, 2025 with over $119.5 million available to fund these various reserves. Within the General Fund Reserve as of the end of fiscal year 2024-25, $0.6 million was restricted for debt services, $11.7 million was assigned for specific purposes, and $106.9 million was unassigned. The unassigned fund balance includes the 15% Contingency Reserve, the 15% Budget Stabilization Reserve, the Housing Set-Aside Reserve, and the Pension Stabilization Reserve. The Sewer Fund has unrestricted net position of $222.5, approximately 454% of total operating and debt interest expenses, exceeding City enterprise fund reserve policy of four months of expenditures, or 33 percent. The reserves have been established to provide sufficient liquidity to the Sewer Fund to ensure adequate funding to complete the Clean Water Program. 145 of 1110
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
xii
In addition to maintaining a strong cash position, operating surplus also maintains the Sewer Enterprise Fund’s continued high debt service coverage ratio at over 2X. Both the cash position and debt service coverage affirm the high-quality credit rating the Sewer Enterprise received of AA- from S&P Global Ratings (formerly known as Standard & Poor’s) and AA rating from Kroll Bond Rating Agency.
There are additional reserves established in the City’s other funds for vehicle and equipment replacement, workers’ compensation, general liability, storm water enterprise, and capital improvements.
DEBT ADMINISTRATION
The City manages the issuance of new debt and proactively communicates with the investment community in the administration of its outstanding debt. In doing so, the City seeks to ensure that debt is issued prudently and affordably, and bondholders are provided all the information required by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board as governed by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Proposition 13 amended the State Constitution by requiring California cities to obtain voter approval prior to issuing general obligation bonds. State statutes further limit general obligation bonded debt to 15% of the assessed value of all real and personal property within the City. As of June 30, 2025, the City’s general obligation bonded debt remaining balance of $12.2 million, including unamortized bond premium, amounted to 0.21% of the $5.8 billion legal debt limit.
According to standard measures used by the primary credit rating agencies to assess debt (e.g. fund balance as a percent of operating expenses, debt-to-assessed valuation ratios, debt per capita, etc.), the City’s level of direct debt obligations is considered low in comparison to similarly sized cities. Rating agencies cite the City’s strong financial management and prudent fiscal policies as credit strengths. As of June 30, 2025, the City’s rating for general obligation bonds is AAA by Standard & Poor’s and Aaa from Moody’s Investor Service. The City of San Mateo Joint Powers Public Financing Authority manages two bond issues that have $15.2 million in balance outstanding.
Additional information pertaining to the City’s outstanding long-term debt can be found under LongTerm Debt (Note 7) in the Notes to the Basic Financial Statements and in the Statistical Section under Legal Debt Margin information.
CASH MANAGEMENT
The City pools cash from all operating sources to manage cash flow and invest idle funds. The Finance Director serves as the City’s Treasurer and, utilizing the services of a third-party asset management advisor, oversees the investment of funds in accordance with the City Council-adopted Investment Policy and Government Code Sections 53601 and 56535. The City Council receives quarterly treasury reports and reviews and approves the City’s Investment Policy each fiscal year.
LONG-TERM FINANCIAL PLANNING
The City of San Mateo has a long tradition of disciplined and prudent fiscal management. To address the significant impacts of the Great Recession and the COVID-19 pandemic, the City Council adopted various strategies for financial sustainability that have been successfully implemented to achieve balanced General Fund budgets and create a mechanism for the City to accumulate sufficient resources to better position its General Fund for economic retractions or disaster. The City’s prudent efforts to adopt a reserves policy and accumulate additional reserves during the years of economic prosperity have proven prescient given the current estimated General Fund budget deficits and the current economic climate that includes rising labor and operating costs due to inflation and less sustained growth on the revenue side.
146 of 1110
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
xiii
The City continues to adhere to a planning process that focuses on financial sustainability. To this end, the City annually updates a long-term General Fund financial projection model designed to inform decision makers of the long-term impacts of near-term financial proposals. The City also maintains a five-year long-range capital planning process and capital improvement plan that is annually updated.
This plan drives capital project funding decisions and periodic new bonded debt issuances for larger capital infrastructure investments.
For General Fund operations, revenues and expenditures are forecasted out for ten years to continually assess the long-term structural balance of that fund and allow adequate time for thoughtful course correction if a structural imbalance occurs. Major General Fund revenues will be tracked closely, particularly in light of uncertainties that could impact revenue growth. These uncertainties include VLF shortfall, slowing sales tax, economic conditions and events that affect Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) and real property transfer tax revenues.
AWARDS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City for its ACFR for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. The Certificate of Achievement is a national award recognizing conformance with the highest standards for preparation of state and local government financial reports. To be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, the City must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized ACFR. This report must satisfy both U.S. GAAP and applicable legal requirements. This was the thirty-fifth consecutive year that the City has received this award. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for one year only. We believe that this FY 2024-25 ACFR continues to conform to the Certificate of Achievement program requirements, and we will submit it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate.
The preparation of this ACFR could not have been accomplished without the efficient and dedicated service of the highly qualified staff in the Finance Department. The dedication and cooperation of staff in all City departments in the administration of financial policies throughout the year is also appreciated. Special thanks go to the City’s Accounting Manager, Ha Tran, who oversaw the compilation and review of the financial statements. We also acknowledge the thorough and professional manner in which our independent auditors, The Pun Group, conducted their audit.
In closing, City staff wishes to express deep appreciation to the City Council for their leadership, support, and responsiveness to the financial concerns of the City.
Respectfully submitted,
Alex Khojikian, City Manager
Abby Veeser, Finance Director
147 of 1110
City of San Mateo City Council Members
2025
xiv
148 of 1110
California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, q
EPA, NPS, USDA, USFWS
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
City of San Mateo
xv
149 of 1110
BeqvOoc[kex[qelk[hBd[oq
ƙ
Bese^@oqpBljjeqq``
BljjrkeqvR`h[qelkpBljjeppelk
Iks`pqj`kq@_seplovBljjeqq``
Le]o[ovAl[o_
M`[pro`SOs`opecdqBljjeqq``
Mlpnreql[k_V`^qloBlkqolhCepqoe^q
P[ogpҢR`^o`[qelkBljjeppelk
P`oplkk`hAl[o_
Ph[kkekcBljjeppelk
S`kelo@_seplovBljjeppelk
Srpq[ek[]eheqv[k_Ikao[pqor^qro`Bljjeppelk
Ylrqd@_seplovBlrk^eh
M[vlo
C`mrqvM[vlo
Blrk^ehM`j]`o
Blrk^ehM`j]`o
Blrk^ehM`j]`o
BeqvM[k[c`o
Beqv@qqlok`v
BeqvBlrk^eh
Rl]N`tpljJoҼ
@_[jLlo[ek`
Ne^lh`E`ok[k_`x
C[ke`hh`BteoglӣFl_v^ge
Lep[Ce[xN[pd
@h`uKdlfege[k
Po[p[kk[R[pe[d
@ppepq[kqBeqvM[k[c`o
BeqvBh`og
BeqvLe]o[oe[k
BljjrkeqvC`s`hlmj`kqCeo`^qlo
Eek[k^`Ceo`^qlo
Hrj[kR`plro^`pCeo`^qlo
Ikaloj[qelkT`^dklhlcvCeo`^qlo
P[ogp[k_R`^o`[qelkCeo`^qlo
Plhe^`Bde`a
Pr]he^WlogpCeo`^qlo
C`m[oqj`kqH`[_p
Bdoepqek[Hlooep]`oc`o
M[oqekM^T[cc[oq
Rrgpd[k[Sekcd
Z[^dC[dh
K[o`kHr[kc
@o[^`he[Dpm[ox[
P`q`Ot`k
Jl[kk`M[coeke
D_A[o]`oeke
M[qqE[]ov
ƙ
xvi
150 of 1110
Government Finance Officers Association
Certificate of
Achievement
for Excellence
in Financial
Reporting
Presented to
City of San Mateo
California
For its Annual Comprehensive
Financial Report
For the Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2024
Executive Director/CEO
xvii
151 of 1110
This page intentionally left blank.
152 of 1110
2121 North California Blvd., Suite 290
Walnut Creek, California 94596
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council of the City of San Mateo
San Mateo, California
Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements
Opinions
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of San Mateo, California (the “City”), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025, and the related notes to the basic financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City, as of June 30, 2025, and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinions
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the City, and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.
Emphasis of Matter
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Notes 1 and 19 to the financial statements, the City implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board (“GASB”) Statement No. 101, Compensated Absences, effective July 1, 2024. The implementation of this standard required the City to change its method of accounting for compensated absences and resulted in a restatement of beginning net position as of July 1, 2024. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter. 153 of 1110
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council of the City of San Mateo
San Mateo, California
2 Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City’s ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinions.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements.
In performing an audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, we
exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed. evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements. conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control-related matters that we identified during the audit.
154 of 1110
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council of the City of San Mateo
San Mateo, California
3 Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the Management’s Discussion and Analysis, Budgetary Comparison Schedules, Schedule of City’s Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability and Related Ratios, Schedules of Contributions – Pension, and Schedule of Changes in Total OPEB Liability and Related Ratios, as listed in the accompanying table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.
Supplementary Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements. The Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements, Budgetary Comparison Schedules, Schedule of Assessments, and Impact Fees and Related Expenditures are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements, Budgetary Comparison Schedules, and the Schedule of Assessment and Impact Fees and Related Expenditures are fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.
Other Information
Management is responsible for the other information included in the annual report. The other information comprises the Introductory and Statistical Sections but does not include the basic financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our opinions on the basic financial statements do not cover the other information, and we do not express an opinion or any form of assurance thereon.
In connection with our audit of the basic financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and consider whether a material inconsistency exists between the other information and the basic financial statements, or the other information otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work performed, we conclude that an uncorrected material misstatement of the other information exists, we are required to describe it in our report. 155 of 1110
To the Honorable Mayor and Members
of the City Council of the City of San Mateo
San Mateo, California