Humboldt Bike lanes
Alternative
City Council
February 2, 2026
Public Works Department
Jay Yu P.E., Engineering Manager
1 of 45
I. Background
II. Phase II Engagement
III. Final Fremont and Idaho Street
Alternative and Streetlight Upgrade
IV. Other Considerations
V. Potential Alternatives
VI. Next Steps
2 of 45AGENDA
Feedback Needed from City Council
Staff is seeking direction from the City Council on
how to proceed with the Humboldt Bike Lanes
Alternative project
3 of 45
I. BACKGROUND
4 of 45
2020 Bicycle Master Plan 5 of 45
2020 Bicycle Master
Plan
(Adopted April 2020)
List of 100+
Priority Projects
• Vision
• Forward facing
• Future Bicycle Infrastructure in
San Mateo
Criteria
• Connectivity
• Safety & Comfort
• Equity
• Ridership
Humboldt Bike Lanes
#2 Ranked High
Priority Project
Project History
April 2020
Citywide
Bicycle
Master Plan
Adoption
(#2 High Priority Project) Nov 2021
Start of Construction
(NTP)
Feb 2022
City Council
voted to Install
Bike Lanes
12/4/24
NC
Community
Meeting
Seeking
Input
Jan – July 2021
Design/Outreach
July 2022
Construction
Completion
2/3/25
Meeting with
City Council
Seek
Direction on
Community
Feedback
March 2023
North Central Complete
Streets Plan (NCCSP)
Scoping
May 2023
NCCSP Budget
Appropriation
6/17/24
City Council
Directed Staff to
Reengage with
Community
6 of 45
Phase I
May 2021
Adoption of
FY 21-22 AAP
July 2020
Adoption of
FY 20-21 AAP
2/3/2025 – City Council Meeting Direction
Alt 1
❑ Cost: $0
❑ Schedule:
N/A
Alt 4
Restoration of Parking and
Bike Lane Removal
❑ Cost: ~$850,000
❑ Schedule: 6m– 1yr
Alt 2
Restoration of Parking and
Bike Lane Removal
❑ Cost: ~$850,000
❑ Schedule: 6m– 1yr
Bike Boulevard (Design &
CON)
❑ Cost: ~2.2M
❑ Schedule: 1 – 3yr
Alt 3
Restoration of Parking &
Bike Lane Removal
❑ Cost: ~$620,000
❑ Schedule: 6m – 1yr
Parallel Pilot Bike Boulevard
❑ Cost: ~$150K – $300K
❑ Schedule: 6m – 1yr
(inc. community engagement)
Alt 5
Streetlight Cost
❑ Humboldt Street:
~$45,000
❑ Fremont Street:
~$25,000
❑ Idaho Street:
~$20,000
Est. Total: ~$3M Est. Total: ~$920K
Est. Total: ~$1M
Est. Total: ~$850k
Est. Total: ~$70k
Long-Term Plan (Include in NCCSP)
❑ Connectivity Study: ~$60K
❑ Greater NC Bike Boulevards: ~$1M
❑ Schedule 1-3yr
Keep As-Is
Humboldt
Bike Blvd.
Partial Removal,
Pilot Bike Blvd.
Full Bike
Lane Removal
Streetlighting
Upgrade
Est. Total: ~$0
7 of 37
2/3/2025 City Council Meeting Direction 8 of 45
Fiesta
Gardens
Elem.
II. Phase 2 – Engagement
9 of 45
February 2,
2026June 18 October 27
I. DIRECTION
ALT 3 - Explore a bike
boulevard at Fremont
street and Idaho
Street.
ALT 5 - Pursue
lighting upgrades
February
2025
II.
Engagement
and Concept
Design
II.
Engagement
and Concept
Design
III.
City Council
Update +
Funding
Appropriation
IV.
Implementation
(If provided
direction)
Here Now
Phase II - Schedule
Phase II Schedule
Community
Workshop #1
Intro and initial
feedback
City Council
Receive feedback
and provide
direction
Community
Workshop #3
Final Concept
Design
August 25
Community
Workshop #2
Concept design
10 of 45
December 10,
2025
Sustainability and
Infrastructure
Commission
Provide a
recommendation to CC
Here Now
Engagement Figures 11 of 45
Distribution Summary
• 35,000+ Mailed Notices
• 140+ A-Frames
• 1,000+ Flyers
• Targeted door-to-door canvassing
• Continuous promotion through social
media (Next-Door, Instagram, Facebook, X and etc.)
• Word of mouth through community partner
networks (NC Lived Experience Group)
• 50,000+ engagements for the entire
process
• English, Spanish and Chinese in all
distribution material
Workshop Accomodations
• In-Person and Virtual Settings
• Childcare, food and refreshments
• All presentations and materials are
in 3 separate languages
• Live interpretation in Spanish and
Chinese
35,000+ Mailers
140+ A-Frames
1,000+ Flyers
Door-To-Door
Canvassing
Continuous
Social Media
Promotion
Community Partners
50,000+
Engagements
Accommodations
In-Person and Virtual Childcare, food and
refreshments
English, Spanish and
Chinese
Live Interpretations in
Spanish and Chinese
Accessible local venues
Distribution
Workshop No. 1 – Initial Feedback - Summary 12 of 45
Attendance: 60
Goal: Receive initial feedback on usage and impacts
from the bike lane installation on Humboldt Street
Survey Response: 213 (In-Person + Online)
Summary of Feedback
❑ Removal of parking has worsened the
parking supply in North Central
❑ Streetlight improvements are welcomed
❑ Community survey showed vehicle usage
on Humboldt Street is the predominate
mode
❑ Lower vehicle speeds is well supported
❑ Idaho Street and Fremont Street are
narrow
❑ Discussions of other streets for bicycle
facilities
Workshop No. 2 – Draft Concept Designs - Summary 13 of 45 Attendance: 45+
Goal: Receiving feedback on the draft concept designs
for both Idaho Street and Fremont Street Alternatives
Survey Response: 70 (In-Person + Online)
Summary of Feedback
❑ Speed humps over rumble strips
❑ Traffic circles were well received where
curb extension were not
❑ Skepticism remained about whether
improvements would lower speeds from
25mph to 15-18mph
❑ New stop sign installations were well
received
❑ Support slowing speeds on Fremont and
Idaho, but not at the expense of
removing bike lanes on Humboldt Street
Workshop No. 3 – Final Concept Designs - Summary 14 of 45 Attendance: 50+
Goal: Receiving feedback on Final Design and
understanding how the community prioritize where
the Humboldt bike lanes should be
Survey Response: 400+ (In-Person + Online+Mailers)
Summary of Feedback
❑ Driveway visibility concerns for both
Fremont Street and Idaho Street
alternatives
❑ Final alternatives were consistent with
the feedback through the workshops
❑ Appreciate the speed calming measures
for both alternatives, but still view the
alternatives as a downgrade from the
existing Class II on Humboldt Street
FOUR QUESTION SURVEY
15 of 45
Workshop No. 3 – In-Person Survey Results 16 of 45
52 43
4 3
20 9
44 36
2 4
20 8
78 65
6 5
28 13
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
All Results All NC Humboldt Idaho Fremont Other Communities Idaho Street Fremont Street Keep on Humboldt
In-Person Survey Results
Priority Ranking Summary*
(40 T otal Surveys)
*Weighted Ranking Method
Each vote is assigned between 1 to 3 points
1st Choice = 3 points
2nd Choice = 2 points
3rd Choice = 1 point
Example: 10 votes for 1 st Choice
10 Votes x 3 points = 30 points
Workshop No. 3 – Online Survey Results 17 of 45
415
183
75 18 22
232
347
169
57 17 26
178
552
242
102
19 30
310
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
All Results All NC Humboldt Idaho Fremont Other Communities Idaho Street Fremont Street Keep on Humboldt
Online Survey Results
Priority Ranking Summary*
(219 T otal Surveys)
*Weighted Ranking Method
Each vote is assigned between 1 to 3 points
1st Choice = 3 points
2nd Choice = 2 points
3rd Choice = 1 point
Example: 10 votes for 1 st Choice
10 Votes x 3 points = 30 points
Workshop No. 3 – Online Survey Results (including duplicate IP) 18 of 45 478
218
98 20 40
260
414
208
73 21 41
206
662
306
141
25 63
356
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
700
All Results All NC Humboldt Idaho Fremont Other Communities Idaho Street Fremont Street Keep on Humboldt
Online Survey Results
Priority Ranking Summary*
(284 T otal Surveys)
*Weighted Ranking Method
Each vote is assigned between 1 to 3 points
1st Choice = 3 points
2nd Choice = 2 points
3rd Choice = 1 point
Example: 10 votes for 1 st Choice
10 Votes x 3 points = 30 pointsINCLUDING DUPLICA TE IP
ADDRESSES
Workshop No. 3 – Mailer Survey Results 19 of 45
176
51 14
30 179
59 27 19
197
58 25 35
0 50
100
150
200
250
All NC Residents Humboldt Residents Idaho Residents Fremont Residents Idaho Street Fremont Street Keep on Humboldt
Mailed Survey Results
Priority Ranking Summary*
(150 T otal Surveys)
*Weighted Ranking Method
Each vote is assigned between 1 to 3 points
1st Choice = 3 points
2nd Choice = 2 points
3rd Choice = 1 point
Example: 10 votes for 1 st Choice
10 Votes x 3 points = 30 points
Pedestrian Scale Lighting
Overall
North
Central
Residents
Cobrahead Roadway Lighting
27%
63%
10%
0%
50%
100%
Existing High No
Preference
25%
64%
11%
0%
50%
100%
Existing High No
Preference
16% 28%
46%
10%
0%
20%
40%
60%
Existing Medium High No
Preference
16% 29%
46%
9%
0%
20%
40%
60%
Existing Medium High No
Preference
North Central Streetlighting Pilot - Results 20 of 45
School Feedback
San Mateo-Foster City School District Board
unanimously adopted a resolution strongly
supporting retention of the existing Class II
bike lanes on Humboldt Street
January 23, 2025
San Mateo-Foster City
School District Board
San Mateo High School
and Fiesta Gardens
International School
Faculty
• Acknowledge the parking loss caused by
the Humboldt Bike lanes
• Supportive of speed calming measures,
specifically on Indian Avenue
• Safety is very important
21 of 45
Phase II Engagement Summary 22 of 45
Streetlighting upgrades to
increase existing lighting
levels are well supported
The community is
supportive for measures
to slow speeds and
volumes in neighborhood
streets, but not at the
trade-off of removing
parking or existing bicycle
infrastructure
The final survey showed that
all three survey formats
preferred to keep the bike
lanes on Humboldt Street
(400+ surveys received)
Mailed survey responses
indicated residents living on
Humboldt and Idaho Street
preferred the Fremont Street
Bike Boulevard Alternative over
retaining the Humboldt Street
bike lanes
Parking availability remains a
problem for the North Central
community-specifically for
residents on Humboldt Street,
where parking spaces were
removed for the installation
of the bike lanes
III. FINAL FREMONT AND IDAHO
STREET ALTERNATIVES AND
STREETLIGHT UPGRADE
23 of 45
No Parking Removal
Safer StreetsReduce Speed
Project Goals
Bike Boulevard will
NOT remove parking
(outside of AB413 Daylighting Law)
24 of 45
Peak Bike Usage – Trips On N. Humboldt Corridor
41 21
59 63 68
60 31
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 Peninsula Avenue E. Poplar Avenue Indian Avenue Monte Diablo Tilton Avenue 2nd Avenue 3rd Avenue AM PEAK: 7:00AM – 9:00AM
PM PEAK: 4:00PM – 6:00PM
WEEKDAY ONLY
DOES NOT INCLUDE SIDEWALK BICYCLISTS
# of Bicycles Trips
Intersections on Humboldt Street
56%
44%Humboldt
X-Traffic
Corridor Total: 68% Humboldt / 32% X-Traffic
25 of 45
10%
90%
25%
75%
46%
54%
26%
74%
32%
68%
16%
84%
Peak Bike Usage – Trips On Idaho and Fremont Street
11 63
32 1821
67 47
91 13
0 20
40 60
80 100
Indian Avenue Monte Diablo Tilton Avenue 2nd Avenue 3rd Avenue AM PEAK: 7:00AM – 9:00AM
PM PEAK: 4:00PM – 6:00PM
WEEKDAY ONLY
DOES NOT INCLUDE SIDEWALK BICYCLISTS
# of Bicycles Trips
10%
90%
4%
96%
11%
89%
18%
82%
40%
60%
0%
100%
0%
100%
Idaho/Fremont
X-Traffic
Corridor T otal: 37% Fremont Street / 63% X-Traffic
26 of 45
65%
35%
46%
54%
87%
13%
64%
36%
71%
29%
67%
33%
45%
55%
34%
66%
66%
34%
Corridor T otal: 43% Idaho Street / 57% X-Traffic
Fremont StreetIdaho Street
Potential Idaho Street Alternative Overview
Traffic Circle Speed Humps
High-Visibility Crosswalks Painted Curb Extensions Centerline Hardening Stop Signs
Idaho Street Bike Boulevard Alternative
Existing Humboldt Class II Bike Lanes
Idaho Street Bike Boulevard Alternative
27 of 45
Potential Idaho Street Alternative - Summary
67%
North Central
Residents
67%
Idaho
Residents
43%
North Central
Residents
56%
Idaho
Residents
51%
North Central
Residents
60%
Idaho
Residents (None)
Existing Target Projected
Speed 23-25mph 20mph 18mph
Volume 130vph 150vph 31-150vph
Summary of Improvements
• 2 x T raffic Circle
• 8 x Stop Sign Installations
• 21 x Speed Hump
• 24 x High Visibility Crosswalks
Expected Performance Metrics
Estimated Cost: $1.37M
This cost includes restoration of Humboldt Street from
Indian Avenue to 2nd Avenue to
before bike lanes were installed, the design work needed to bring the 15% concept designs to construction,
construction and inspection services and a contingency.
Idaho Street Alternative
28 of 45
Potential Fremont Street Alternative Overview
Slow Streets Signage Speed Humps
High-Visibility Crosswalks Painted Curb Extensions Centerline Hardening Stop Signs
Fremont Street Bike Boulevard Alternative
Existing Humboldt Class II Bike Lanes
Idaho Street Bike Boulevard Alternative
29 of 45
Potential Fremont Street Alternative – Summary
Existing Target Projected
Speed 23-26mph 20mph 15-18mph
Volume 111-201vph 150vph 50-141vph
Summary of Improvements
• 3 x Intersection Curb Extensions
• 11 x Stop Sign Installations
• 10 x Speed Hump
• 27 x High Visibility Crosswalks
Expected Performance Metrics
Estimated Cost: $1.32M
This cost includes restoration of Humboldt Street from
Indian Avenue to 2nd Avenue to
before bike lanes were installed, the design work needed to bring the 15% concept designs to construction,
construction and inspection services and a contingency.
Fremont Street Alternative
30 of 45
Streetlighting Upgrade - Estimated Cost
Streetlighting Upgrade Estimated Cost
Symbol Street Limits Estimated
Cost
Idaho Street 2nd Ave. – Indian Ave. $40,500
Humboldt Street Peninsula Ave. – 5th Ave. $94,000
Fremont Street 2nd Ave. – Indian Ave. $47,500
A
B
C
A
B
C
31 of 45
IV. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
32 of 45
Residential Parking Permit Program (RPPP)
The current policy requires
50% Response rate with a 67%
support required to implement
a new permit area
33 of 45
Permit Program
Boundaries
Large
Commercial
Vehicles
Community
Support
Current policy does not allow
large commercial vehicles to
obtain a permit. Phase II
indicates there are commercial
vehicles in North Central
North Central has over
4,500 households.
Focused permit program
or wider community?
North Central Private Site Parking Leases 34 of 45
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Property ID Property Name
A San Mateo High School
B San Mateo High School
District Offices
C Fiesta Gardens International
School
D Sturge Presbyterian Church
E Community Baptist Church
F State of California
Administrative Office of the
Courts
G Army National Guard Office
H Department of Motor
Vehicles (DMV)
I MLK Center
H
I
Not Interested
Maybe
Active Overnight Parking
Limits of Humboldt CC directed staff
to explore restoration of parking
Indian
Ave.
Santa
Inez Ave.
Tilton
Ave.
Poplar
Ave.
Other Humboldt Corridor Improvements
Poplar/Humboldt
Intersection Safety Project
• Protected Left Turns
• Intersection lighting
upgrades
Completed: Fall 2025
Cost: $1M
Local Roadway Safety Priority Package 1
• Signage Upgrades
• Improved intersection sight distance
• Raised crosswalks (one leg on Humboldt)
• Consider lighting improvements
• Improved pedestrian crossings with enhanced
safety features
• Explore curb extensions
• Consider an all -way STOP
Design: Starting Early 2026
Cost: $1M (Federally Funded)
Raised Crosswalks
Existing Projected
Speed 24 – 30mph 22-26mph
Volume 432-488vph Same
Expected Performance Metrics
Humboldt Street
Funded Active Projects
Potential Speed Calming
Improvements
Humboldt Street
Completed Projects
35 of 45
36 of 45Original Humboldt Bike Lanes Funding Questions
If the Class II bike lanes are removed. The City would need to credit back the bike lane improvement amount into the City’s Local CDBG account.
Were the original Humboldt
Bike Lanes an approved
improvement eligible for (or
funded by) CDBG funding?
What are the implications if
we remove bike lanes
originally funded with CDBG
funds?
V. POTENTIAL ALTERNATIVES
37 of 45
38 of 45
Alternative 1
Keep As-Is
Alternative 2
Keep As-Is with
Additional
Humboldt Street Calming
Measures
+
Streetlighting Upgrades
+
Explore Permit Parking
Program
Alternative 3
Idaho Street
Bike Boulevard
+
Streetlighting
Upgrades
Alternative 4
Fremont Street
Bike Boulevard
+
Streetlighting
Upgrades
Potential Alternatives - Overview
Potential Alternatives – 1 and 2
Alternative Summary Estimated
Cost:
Alternative 1
Keep As-Is
• Existing Facility: Keep existing Class II bicycle facility on Humboldt street • Parking on Humboldt Street: Parking on Humboldt Street from 2nd Avenue to Indian Avenue will not be restored $0
Alternative 2
Keep As-Is with Additional
Humboldt Street Calming
Measures + Streetlighting
Upgrades +
Explore Permit Parking Program
• Existing Facility: Keep existing Class II bicycle facility on Humboldt street • Parking on Humboldt Street: Parking on Humboldt Street from 2nd Avenue to Indian Avenue will not be restored
• Streetlighting: Streetlighting on Humboldt Street from Peninsula Avenue to 5th Avenue will be upgraded to a brighter fixture
• Other
• Staff will explore a tailored permit parking program for North Central to address the Humboldt bike lanes impacts
• Two (2) raised crosswalks will be installed north of Poplar Avenue on Humboldt Street to slow speeds on Humboldt Street
$295,000
39 of 45
Potential Alternatives – 3 and 4
Alternative Summary Estimated
Cost:
Alternative 3
Idaho Street Bike Boulevard
+
Streetlighting Upgrades
• Existing Facility: Remove keep existing Class II bicycle facility on Humboldt street (Indian Ave. to 2nd Ave.)
• New Facility: Install a new bicycle boulevard on Idaho Street from 2nd avenue to Indian Avenue per the final Idaho Street Alternative
• Parking on Humboldt Street: Parking on Humboldt Street from 2nd Avenue to Indian Avenue will be restored (approximately 100 parking spaces) • Streetlighting: Streetlighting will be upgraded for Idaho Street per the limits of the bicycle boulevard and on Humboldt Street from Peninsula Ave. to 5th Ave. • HUD CDBG Funding: Will need to repay HUD for removed bicycle facilities $1.773M
Alternative 4
Fremont Street Bike Boulevard
+
Streetlighting Upgrades
• Existing Facility: Remove keep existing Class II bicycle facility on Humboldt street (Indian Ave. to 2nd Ave.)
• New Facility: Install a new bicycle boulevard on Fremont Street from 2nd avenue to Indian Avenue per the final Fremont Street Alternative • Parking on Humboldt Street: Parking on Humboldt Street from 2nd Avenue to Indian Avenue will be restored (approximately 100 parking spaces) • Streetlighting: Streetlighting will be upgraded for Idaho Street per the limits of the bicycle boulevard and on Humboldt Street from Peninsula Ave. to 5th Ave. • HUD CDBG Funding: Will need to repay HUD for removed bicycle facilities $1.733M
40 of 45
Streetlighting Upgrade - Estimated Cost
Streetlighting Upgrade Estimated Cost
Symbol Street Limits Estimated
Cost
Idaho Street 2nd Ave. – Indian Ave. $40,500
Humboldt Street Peninsula Ave. – 5th Ave. $94,000
Fremont Street 2nd Ave. – Indian Ave. $47,500
A
B
C
A
B
C
41 of 45
42 of 45Sustainability and Infrastructure Commission Feedback 12/10/25 Sustainability and Infrastructure
Commission Recommendation
• Commissioners voted 5-0 for Alternative No. 2
Summary of Meeting
• Received over 30 public comments for the item
• Public feedback varied:
• Support for retaining bike lanes on
Humboldt to prioritize safety
• Calls to remove bike lanes and restore
parking, without providing an alternative
bicycle connection
• Commissioners advocated for:
• Improved streetlighting
• Additional parking relief for the NC
Community
Feedback Needed from City Council 43 of 45
Staff is seeking direction from the City Council on
how to proceed with the Humboldt Bike Lanes
Alternative project
V. NEXT STEPS
44 of 45
February 2,
2026June 18 October 27
II.
Engagement
and Concept
Design
Next Step
Phase II Schedule
Community
Workshop #1
Intro and initial
feedback
City Council
Receive feedback
and provide
direction
Community
Workshop #3
Final Concept
Design
August 25
Community
Workshop #2
Concept design
45 of 45
December 10,
2025
Sustainability
and
Infrastructure
Commission
Receive feedback
Here Now
City Council Funding
Appropriation
Staff will come back to
City Council on the
recommendation to
appropriate funding
Implementation of
Selected Alternative
Staff will implement the
selected alternative
Thank You
Jay Yu P .E., Engineering Manager
Public Works
[email protected]
650-522-7300
46 of 45