Cities Index.
PUBLIC COMMENT_ Post Packet Publication

San Mateo City Council
February 23, 2026

Document
PUBLIC COMMENT_ Post Packet Publication
Meeting
February 23, 2026
Body
San Mateo City Council
Original file
1.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on sanmateo.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

1 From: Remi Tan
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2026 1:12 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Cc: Zoning Update
Subject: Public Comment: Promote Homes with Zoning Reform Hello city council members, my name is Remi Tan and I live in nearby Pacifica, but come to San Mateo oŌen for shopping and meeƟngs and events.

During next week's zoning study session, please support staff's work to modernize the zoning code. I hope the code update will simplify the code as much as possible and allow the most new homes permissible under the General Plan.

As a local architect, who has done some projects in San Mateo, we hope that streamline zoning will make things easier for our clients who are trying to build housing in San Mateo.

I also hope you carefully consider SB79 as a template for the zoning update. Using the SB79 parameters will simplify things as the city would be coordinated with the state regulaƟons, making life a lot easier and simpler for us in the design and building in industry. This would help speed up construcƟon of housing and lower cost.

SB79 was carefully considered to place higher density within walking distance of high-quality transit like Caltrain and the future bus rapid transit line on El Camino Real. By placing housing in density near these transit lines, it would increase the writer ship, which will then encourage the agencies to increase frequency and speed of service. This would encourage people to use transit versus driving and reduce traffic on our roads and reduce polluƟon and greenhouse gas emissions.

This is a win-win situaƟon.

Sincerely,
Thank you and Best Regards,

Remi Tan, AIA LEED AP BD+C

Architecture, Green Building
Real estate investment and brokerage

Sent from my iPhone

1 From: Sung H. Kwon
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2026 10:16 AM
To: Chantal Eaton
Subject: FW: Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter Comments on Comprehensive Zoning Code Update (CZCU)
Attachments: SCLP letter to San Mateo re Zoning Code comments Feb 19 2026.pdf Hi Chantal,

Can you add this to the comments?

Sincerely,

Sung H. Kwon MCRP MBA AICP
Deputy Director | Community Development

From: Dashiell Leeds >
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2026 4:59 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo) <[email protected]>; Planning Commission <[email protected]>; Zoning Update <[email protected]> Cc: Gita Dev ; James Eggers ; Sue Chow

Subject: Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter Comments on Comprehensive Zoning Code Update (CZCU)

Dear Mayor Loraine and Members of the San Mateo City Council, Planning Commission and City Staff, The Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter's Sustainable Land Use Committee (SLU) advocates on land use issues in San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties.

SLU offers these comments as an overview of key issues that we believe need to be addressed in the Comprehensive Zoning Code Update (CZCU). Please read the attached letter for our full comments.

Sincerely,
Gita Dev, FAIA, Chair
Sustainable Land Use Committee
Chair, Conservation Committee
Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter

SAN MATEO, SANTA CLARA & SAN BENITO COUNTIES

February 19, 2026 Via Email: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Subject: Key Issues for Comprehensive Zoning Code Update Dear Mayor Loraine and Members of the San Mateo City Council, Planning Commission and City Staff,
The Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter's Sustainable Land Use Committee (SLU) advocates on land use

issues

in

San

Mateo

and

Santa

Clara

Counties.

SLU offers the comments below as an overview of key issues that we believe need to be addressed in the

Comprehensive

Zoning

Code

Update

(CZCU).

These

comments

are

consistent

with

the

comments

that

SLU

made

for

the

General

Plan

2040

(GP)

process

(see

letters

of

March

1,

2024,

November

16,

2023,

September

7,

2023,

August

9,

2023,

and

March

28,

2023).

We have reviewed the White Papers on Open Space, Building Heights, and Setbacks & Buffers. They provide

a

good

start

to

the

CZCU

process.

1. Increase emphasis on the need for increased housing, particularly affordable housing. a. Streamline and reduce costs for development of housing. While the White Papers mention

this

in

several

areas,

a

more

specific

discussion

should

be

incorporated

into

this

policy

statement.

Simplifying

the

code,

clarifying

and

standardizing

requirements

and

not

being

overly

prescriptive

will

reduce

development

costs

and

increase

the

likelihood

of

developing

vitally

needed

housing.

An

enumeration

of

key

requirements

should

be

included

at

the

outset.

b. Increase focus on affordable housing. The affordable housing category is the most difficult

type

of

housing

to

develop,

as

evidenced

by

past

failures

to

meet

affordable

housing

goals,

while

the

goals

for

market

rate

housing

are

being

met.

This

points

to

the

need

to

simplify

and

streamline

even

more

for

fully

affordable

projects.

2. Open Space: Ensure that the increased building heights leads to more Open Space as well

as

quality

Open

Space.

sierraclub.org/loma-prieta ~ 3921 East Bayshore Road, Suite 204, Palo Alto, CA 94303

Page

1 of

3 a. Ensure Open Space for Nature and Urban Greening: The focus in the draft Open Space

White

Papers

is

on

recreation

and

gatherings,

which

are

important.

However,

open

space

that

is

specifically

for

the

value

of

nature

needs

to

be

a

significant

part

of

the

reason

and

use

for

urban

open

space

as

well.

Large

trees

and

vegetation

buffers

will

benefit

human

health,

both

physical

and

mental.

They

clean

urban

pollution,

provide

shading/cooling,

wind

breaks,

runoff

absorption,

noise

absorption,

and

wildlife

habitat.

Even

city

birds

and

bees

need

something

more

than

pruned

shrubs

and

courtyards.

The

urban

forest,

tall

trees

on

streets

and

alleys,

make

the

streets

far

more

livable,

increase

property

values

and

are

especially

desirable

for

walking

and

biking.

The

CZCU

needs

to

reflect

this

overarching

objective

for

greening

our

City,

and

the

Sierra

Club

SLU

Guidelines

on

Green

Streets

is

one

source

of

information

on

how

to

accomplish

this
1 .
b. Taller buildings can be linked to creating more open space: Mechanisms need to be included

in

the

CZCU

to

incentivize

developers

to

provide

for

more

and

better

Open

Space

for

parks/bike

lanes/green

streets/natural

areas/etc.

The

White

Paper

mentions

that

incentives

will

be

developed

as

part

of

the

CZCU.

SLU

suggests

that

one

possible

incentive

would

be

to

allow

higher

heights,

but

not

more

density
,

if

that

leads

to

more

common

open

space.

This

could

be

accomplished

by

setting

maximum

housing

density

and

open

space

requirements

in

a

given

zoning

district,

but

not

setting

a

maximum

building

height

and

possibly

adding

incentives

for

green

open

space

that

exceeds

the

minimum

such

as

expedited

plan

review

to

reduce

lag

time

development

costs.

3. Biological Safety Levels (BSL) adjacent to sensitive receptors a. Only Biological Safety Levels (BSL) 1 and 2 biolabs should be allowed in zoning for office,

commercial,

manufacturing,

Life

Safety,

or

similar

non-residential

uses.

Most

Industrial

Zoning

in

peninsula

cities

should

also

be

similarly

restricted

as

they

are

adjacent

to

residential

and

other

uses

with

sensitive

receptors.
b. Bio-lab uses should not be allowed within a specified distance of sensitive receptors including

housing,

schools,

hospitals

and

emergency

service

locations.

4. Focus on planning now for sea level rise and associated ground water rise. a. A Sea Level Rise (SLR) Overlay Zone should be considered for those areas with low ground

elevations

so

that

sea

level

rise

and

associated

ground

water

rise,

from

climate

change,

will

cause

inundation

of

public

infrastructure

such

as

roads

and

underground

utilities

as

well

as

private

homes

and

businesses.

The

overlay

zone

could

identify

specific

requirements

for

new

developments

including

a

requirement

to

raise

first

floor

elevations

above

established

flood

levels

to

better

prepare

for

future

SLR

and

also

a

time

line

for

capital

outlays

to

raise

roads

and

especially

utilities

out

of

corrosive

rising

brackish

ground

water.

b. The overlay zone could include areas directly impacted by SLR as well as related impacts

like

creeks

backing

up

with

higher

tides

and

causing

flooding.

1 See SLU White Paper on Green Corridor/Green Streets Guidelines which uses San Mateo as the example. sierraclub.org/loma-prieta ~ 3921 East Bayshore Road, Suite 204, Palo Alto, CA 94303

Page

2 of

3 c. The Health and Safety Element of the General Plan may also need modification to recognize

the

impacts

of

flooded

infrastructure

and

other

health

and

safety

impacts

of

flooding

from

rising

sea

levels

and

ground

water

levels.

SLU looks forward to further discussions with you on the CZCU. Respectfully, Gita Dev, FAIA, Chair Sustainable Land Use Committee Chair, Conservation Committee Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter Cc: James Eggers, Director, Sierra Club Loma Prieta Chapter sierraclub.org/loma-prieta ~ 3921 East Bayshore Road, Suite 204, Palo Alto, CA 94303

Page

3 of

3

← All documents from this meeting