Agenda packet — San Mateo City Council, May 27, 2026

CITY OF SAN MATEO
City Council Special Meeting
May 27, 2026
6:00 PM
City Hall Conference Room C
Entrance is on O’Farrell Street

COUNCIL MEMBERS
Adam Loraine
Nicole Fernandez
Danielle Cwirko-Godycki
Lisa Diaz Nash
Robert Newsom Jr.

AGENDA
THIS MEETING CAN BE ATTENDED IN PERSON ONLY .

CALL TO ORDER
Roll Call

NEW BUSINESS
The public will have an opportunity to comment during the consideration of this item.

1. Planning Commission – Interviews
The Appointment Subcommittee for the Planning Commission, comprised of Mayor Adam Loraine, Deputy Mayor Nicole Fernandez, and Council Members Danielle Cwirko-Godycki and Robert Newsom, with Community Development Director Zach Dahl advising. The Subcommittee will interview the following applicants to fill one seat on the Commission and will establish an eligibility list for future vacancies:

Thomas Sanfilippo
Thomas O’Connor
Thomas Braham
James Horsman
Stephen O’Neill
Seema Patel

ADJOURNMENT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AGENDAS:

Agendas and material are posted on the City’s website on the Friday preceding each Council Meeting and can be viewed on the City's website at
www.cityofsanmateo.org
. Any supplemental material distributed to the Council after the posting of the agenda will be made part of the official record.

PUBLIC COMMENTS/REQUEST TO SPEAK
Prior to the Meeting
Send comments to:
[email protected]
until 4 p.m. the day of the meeting.

During the meeting
In Person:

At the meeting complete a “Request to Speak” form. Organized Group and Presentations: Up to five (5) minutes for a group presentation, with as many speakers as can be accommodated within that time allowance. To qualify for a group presentation, all individuals associated with the presentation must be clearly identified and confirmed as in attendance at the meeting. Presentation materials must be submitted to [email protected] one (1) business day in advance of the meeting.

ACCESSIBILITY:

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and to ensure meaningful access for all participants, including those with limited English proficiency, individuals requiring special accommodation or language assistance to participate in this meeting may contact the City Clerk’s Office at (650) 522-7040 or [email protected]. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

1 of 153

2 of 153

CITY OF SAN MATEO

BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPLICATION
Planning Commission
Commissioner
REQUIREMENTS:
• Resident and a registered voter of the City of San Mateo • Meeting attendance required
• If appointed, must attend a commissioner orientation session & any training offered

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Name: THOMAS SANFILIPPO
Email:

Primary
Phone:

Address: San Mateo 94402
Street City Zip Code
San Mateo resident
since: 1975 I am a registered voter in City of San Mateo: Yes Board or Commission interested in serving on (check all that apply):

Did you attend a meeting for this Board or
Commission?: No

QUALIFICATIONS
My qualifications for serving on this board/commission are as follows: I have been involved in all phases the real estate business for over 50 years. I have built property in Burlingame, Belmont, San Carlos Daly City and Montara and other places. Plus I have done many remodels in San Mateo over the years. I have the time and desire to get involved with the future of San Mateo
I want to serve on this board/commission because: I have been a homeowner in San Mateo for over 50 years. Hayward Park for the last 30 years. I want to be a part of the future growth of San Mateo. I love this town and want to make sure it stays a great city. I have the time to devote to this position as I am semi retred but still very much involved.

Please list any other background information (business, education, community involvement) which might be useful in considering your appointment and attach a resume: I am a principle owner of Multisource Real Estate and Investment Co on Palm Ave. We have been in business over 30 years.Graduate of:

3 of 153

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]
By checking the box below, I hereby certify that all statements made in this application are true and I authorize investigation of all matters contained in the application. I acknowledge that any false statements or misrepresentation on this application will be cause for refusal of placement or immediate dismissal at any time during the period of my placement. I understand that the City of San Mateo is an Equal Opportunity Employer and this application is public.

Certified/Agreed
1949-04-09
Submitted By Date

4 of 153

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
I believe it is reviewed annually and updated every 5-10 years.It is the framework of everything build in the city, I believe.

2. As California faces the current housing crisis, local land use control over how and where new housing is created has been limited, San Mateans have a great interest and many different views on this topic.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
My personal opinion would have to be removed from the equation as I would like the city to stay the same. I realize that is not going to happen so I would look at projects that make sense, are compatible to the area and adhere to EIRs.I realize new housing must be built and I think Bay Meadows is a good example.

5 of 153

CITY OF SAN MATEO

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Name: Thomas O'Connor
Email:

Primary
Phone:

Address: San Mateo 94401
Street City Zip Code
San Mateo resident
since: 1776 I am a registered voter in City of San Mateo: Yes Board or Commission interested in serving on (check all that apply):

Did you attend a meeting for this Board or
Commission?: Yes

QUALIFICATIONS
My qualifications for serving on this board/commission are as follows: I have a background of construction and construction safety
I want to serve on this board/commission because: I would like to guide future projects in a direction that hires from local communities and has a commitment to worker safety
Please list any other background information (business, education, community involvement) which might be useful in considering your appointment and attach a resume: Board certified safety professional STSC, and CHST Graduate of:City Services Academy 2018

6 of 153

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

Certified/Agreed
2026-04-15
Submitted By Date

7 of 153

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
United States The General Plan serves as the foundational policy document guiding San Mateo’s long- term physical development and land use decisions. It acts as the “constitution” for the city’s built environment, establishing a comprehensive vision for how land should be used, how growth should occur, and how the community’s values—such as housing affordability, environmental sustainability, economic vitality, and quality of life—translate into specific policies and regulations.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
CA California’s housing crisis is real and acute — decades of underproduction have driven extreme affordability challenges, particularly in the Bay Area, where median home prices and rents far outpace wages for many working households. State law (including the Housing Element requirements, Regional Housing Needs Allocation or RHNA process, Housing Accountability Act, and streamlining measures like SB 35 and density bonus law) recognizes housing as a matter of statewide concern and limits local discretion to deny or downsize qualifying projects that meet objective standards. As a Planning Commissioner, I would balance community interests with state mandates in the following ways: 1. Strict adherence to objective standards and state law — Projects that comply with the General Plan, zoning, and objective design guidelines (including those in San Mateo’s recently adopted Strive San Mateo General Plan 2040 and Housing Element) should be approved efficiently. The law is clear: denials or reductions in density are only permissible under narrow circumstances, such as specific, evidence-based health and safety impacts that cannot be mitigated. Subjective neighborhood opposition alone cannot override legal requirements. 2. Prioritize quality, context-sensitive development — I would focus on directing higher-density housing to appropriate locations: downtown, transit corridors (near Caltrain stations), and mixed-use areas identified in the General Plan, rather than uniformly across all single- family neighborhoods. This respects the character of established residential areas that many San Mateans value, while still meeting our RHNA obligations (San Mateo’s current cycle requires planning for thousands of new units across income levels). 3. Emphasize mixed-income and affordable housing — Strong support for projects that include significant below-market-rate units, leveraging state density bonus incentives. Preservation of existing affordable stock and anti-displacement measures are equally important. Infrastructure (traffic, parking, schools, parks, and public safety) must be planned concurrently — not as a barrier, but as a necessary companion to growth. 4. Community engagement and transparency — Early, meaningful public input helps identify legitimate concerns (e.g., traffic, shadow, or compatibility) that can often be addressed through design adjustments or conditions of approval. However, the Commission’s role is to make decisions grounded in adopted policy and evidence, not to act as a referendum on every project. My personal view is that San Mateo benefits from being a vibrant, diverse, and inclusive city with good jobs, schools, and access to transit. Blocking reasonable housing development exacerbates the crisis, increases regional inequality, and pushes

8 of 153

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]
growth (and its impacts) elsewhere. At the same time, unchecked or poorly planned development can erode neighborhood livability and strain services. The responsible path is pragmatic: comply fully with state law while using the tools in our General Plan and Housing Element to shape better outcomes — more housing near jobs and transit, higher design standards, and protections for vulnerable residents.

As someone with a background in safety and risk management (CSP, STSC, CHST), I would particularly emphasize integrating public safety, emergency access, and climate resilience (e.g., sea-level rise adaptation) into every land-use decision. In short, I would vote to approve projects that advance the city’s adopted vision and legal obligations, while working proactively with staff, applicants, and the community to ensure developments enhance — rather than detract from — San Mateo’s quality of life.

9 of 153

CITY OF SAN MATEO

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Name: Thomas Braham
Email:

Primary
Phone:

Address: San Mateo 94401
Street City Zip Code
San Mateo resident
since: 2024 I am a registered voter in City of San Mateo: Yes Board or Commission interested in serving on (check all that apply):

Did you attend a meeting for this Board or
Commission?: No

QUALIFICATIONS
My qualifications for serving on this board/commission are as follows: I am a California licensed architect and Fellow in the American Institute of Architects (AIA) with more than 30 years of experience across a wide variety of project types:
education, corporate, science and research, healthcare, hospitality, and retail, from individual buildings to campus master plans. Each type brings its own unique regulatory environment, user requirements, and planning challenges, and that breadth has sharpened my ability to ask the right questions across very different situations. My experience spans the full project arc from conceptual planning and entitlement through construction, across projects in cities including Sunnyvale, San Bruno, and Napa. My work includes award-winning projects, and I would bring to this commission not just technical knowledge but practiced design judgment. My board service with AIA Illinois, where I served as President with a specific focus on government advocacy and worked directly with the state legislature and its staff, gave me a practical understanding of how policy is made and the difference between defending a position and genuinely advocating for one.

Service on the national AIA board broadened that perspective across the full range of issues facing the profession and the built environment. Together, these experiences complement my technical background with the communication skills that public service requires: the ability to engage diverse constituents clearly, build understanding, and earn trust.

I want to serve on this board/commission because: I want to serve on the Planning Commission because I've seen, close up, what good planning can do and what's at stake when a community has to fight for what makes it distinctive. As a neighbor and active participant in the effort to restore Glazenwood's historic district status, I watched residents, city staff, and ultimately the Council work through a complicated situation from different starting points and arrive at the right answer together. That experience opened my eyes to both the process and the possibilities. With more than 30 years as an architect, I bring technical depth and design judgment to that work. But my time spent on American Institute of Architects (AIA) boards, working at the intersection of the profession and public policy, taught me that good decisions require more than expertise. They require trust, and trust requires communication. San Mateo's 2040 General Plan, Strive San Mateo, reflects exactly that ambition. I believe my skills, and that experience, would make a genuine contribution to San Mateo's future.

10 of 153

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]
Please list any other background information (business, education, community involvement) which might be useful in considering your appointment and attach a resume: The Glazenwood experience, described above, was also my introduction to San Mateo's civic life, and it belongs here as well — not just as motivation for wanting to serve, but as evidence of the kind of neighbor and community participant I aim to be. Attending Council and neighborhood meetings, writing letters to Council members and to the local newspaper, I engaged directly with the planning process and came away with a deeper appreciation for how much difference showing up makes. I have been an active member of St. Francis Lutheran Church in San Francisco for many years, serving on its Council for six years, including two years as Congregation President, and on several committees for even longer. I led a strategic planning initiative and have contributed to the governance and life of the congregation in ways that complement my professional background in meaningful ways. My improv training at The Second City may be the most surprising item on this application. But the foundational principle of improv, "Yes, And" — accepting what your partner offers and building on it — is exactly what good planning requires, and what Strive San Mateo aspires to: listening openly, building on what exists, and moving forward together.

Graduate of:

By checking the box below, I hereby certify that all statements made in this application are true and I authorize investigation of all matters contained in the application. I acknowledge that any false statements or misrepresentation on this application will be cause for refusal of placement or immediate dismissal at any time during the period of my placement. I understand that the City of San Mateo is an Equal Opportunity Employer and this application is public.

Certified/Agreed
2026-04-23
Submitted By Date

11 of 153

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
A General Plan is a community's foundational planning document, a long-range vision for how a city will grow, change, and invest in itself, and the framework against which individual land use decisions are measured. For a Planning Commission, and for a design team, it is both a mandate and a resource: it translates the community's agreed-upon values into the objective standards that guide deliberation and decision-making, even when, especially when, individual decisions are contentious. I was reminded of how powerfully that can work when I watched the recording of the March 24 Planning Commission meeting, in which Chair Seema Patel, during consideration of a multifamily housing project, referenced the General Plan's designation of that corridor for denser housing. At a moment when state mandates have made many housing approvals feel imposed rather than chosen, she redirected the conversation back to a plan that the community itself had developed and adopted. It was a precise and important distinction, and a vivid illustration of what good planning documents make possible: not the absence of tension, but an agreed-upon basis for working through it. Strive San Mateo speaks to several priorities that resonate strongly with my experience and my reasons for wanting to serve. The goal of balancing growth and change reflects what I've seen throughout my career, that the most successful projects and planning processes are those that bring competing interests into genuine dialogue rather than simply choosing sides. The emphasis on enhancing neighborhood fabric and quality of life connects directly to my experience as an architect who has worked across building types and scales, understanding how individual projects shape and are shaped by their surroundings. And the commitment to historic preservation reflects what I learned firsthand through the Glazenwood experience: that preservation and progress are not opposites, and that a community's history is one of its most valuable planning assets. Together these priorities reflect what I find most compelling about Strive San Mateo, that it asks the city not just to manage change but to shape it, with intention and with the community's own values as the guide.

12 of 153

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]
growth and neighborhood character. When individual development proposals arrive before the commission, that plan is the agreed-upon framework for evaluation, not a political position, but a community commitment. As Chair Patel reminded the commission at the March 24 meeting, the General Plan reflects the community's own planning choices, and that grounding is what keeps difficult decisions from becoming purely reactive. My personal view is that density, developed thoughtfully, is a good thing. It provides more housing and more affordable housing, and it supports the civic activity and local commerce that make neighborhoods vital. One of the things that drew my husband and me to San Mateo was precisely its mix of single family and multifamily housing, a mix that I believe contributes directly to the vibrancy of its downtown. My single family home sits directly across the street from a multifamily building, and I consider that a feature, not a problem. I come from a family of lawyers and judges, and I have always admired the discipline that role requires: Holding a considered personal view while remaining genuinely committed to applying the law and the evidence objectively. That is the temperament I would bring to this commission, engaged and informed, but focused on the General Plan, the applicable requirements, and the full range of community interests rather than any single point of view.

13 of 153

14 of 153

15 of 153

16 of 153

17 of 153

18 of 153

19 of 153

CITY OF SAN MATEO

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Name: James Horsman
Email:

Primary
Phone:

Address: San Mateo 94403
Street City Zip Code
San Mateo resident
since: 2023 I am a registered voter in City of San Mateo: Yes Board or Commission interested in serving on (check all that apply):

Did you attend a meeting for this Board or
Commission?: Yes

QUALIFICATIONS
My qualifications for serving on this board/commission are as follows: It is my pleasure to submit my application to join the Planning Commission for the City of San Mateo. A resident of the Bay Meadows neighborhood, I have a strong background in reviewing development proposals and federal policy creation and analysis. My most direct qualification is my City Council appointment to the Potomac Yard Design Advisory Committee in Alexandria, Virginia (pop. 159,000) from 2021-2023. As a part of this group, I reviewed major mixed-use, residential and redevelopment proposals along a transit- oriented corridor, and former rail yard and redevelopment opportunity, immediately south of Washington, D.C. My experience with this body included evaluating site plans, applying design standards and making recommendations based on code rather than public opinion. My experience is supported by my 8 years of federal policy analysis and implementation experience at MicroHealth with the FEMA Office of Chief Information Officer (OCIO) and at World Learning with the U.S. State Department’s International Visitor Leadership Program (IVLP). I additionally created and implemented business development proposals in the healthcare IT industry while at Virtual Radiologic and the professional services industry with Dale Carnegie Minnesota, demonstrating my knowledge of how business plans are developed and implemented. This experience provides me with ample background working in complex regulatory landscapes, coordinating competing stakeholder interests and translating technical requirements into clear guidance for senior government leadership and the public. My experience as a public middle school teacher shows my commitment to bettering the community for future generations. These skills transfer directly to the analytics and deliberative demands of the Planning Commission’s work. I have studied General Plan 2040 and its 3 core themes of sustainability, environmental justice and community engagement. The Planning Commission’s responsibility is implementation and converting a vision built with input from over 6,000 San Mateans into sound land-use decisions. I take that duty seriously. I have attended Planning Commission meetings and monitored recent deliberations over new development proposals, neighborhood concerns and historical preservation standards. I seek an appointment to the Planning Commission because I am committed to through preparation, impartial analysis, and decisions grounded in General Plan 2040 and existing zoning code.

20 of 153

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]
I want to serve on this board/commission because: I would he honored to serve on the Planning Commission for the City of San Mateo because San Mateo is my home and General Plan 2040 represents the most consequential decisions the city will make for generations. I would like to be part of implementing that plan responsibly. My interest in planning and land use is longstanding. I am drawn to them as they combine policy, community design, environmental stewardship and quality of life, areas I have engaged with throughout my career. The work of the Planning Commission is not abstract, it determines what is built, where and how. These are real decisions that will shape daily life for every San Mateo resident for decades to come. There are 3 areas of General Plan 2040 that stand out to me most. The first is the idea of balancing growth and change by concentrating higher density development near Caltrain stations and my neighborhood near El Camino Real and Hillsdale Mall. The tension between the two areas requires the objective regulatory discipline and multi- stakeholder analysis that I have practiced through my federal policy career. The second is my commitment to enhancing the neighborhood fabric and quality of life. The quality of San Mateo’s neighborhoods are what drew me and my wife to make our home here. Protecting their character while accommodating necessary growth consistent with the General Plan is a challenge I take seriously. The third area is ensuring environmental protection and addressing sea level rise, particularly in the Shoreview neighborhood given its bayfront exposure. This is a long-term risk that requires smart land use policy today, the kind of proactive, evidence-based policy work that I find most meaningful. I am seeking this role because I want to see San Mateo continue to be an outstanding place to live, I have valuable experience to contribute to the Planning Commission and I believe that sound planning governance matters.

Please list any other background information (business, education, community involvement) which might be useful in considering your appointment and attach a resume: My background covers 3 distinct areas that support my qualifications to serve on the Planning Commission. The first is my policy and regulatory experience. While at FEMA, my position required sustained engagement with complex regulatory frameworks, strategic communication and multiagency coordination. My Public Trust clearance represented upholding a high standard of handing sensitive information and communication with top government officials. While in this position, I analyzed and modernized federal IT governance policy, created more efficient business process workflows and analyzed software installation requests and updates for cybersecurity compliance. During my time as an IVLP Program Officer, I planned public policy study trips throughout the U.S. for international visitors, including the Bay Area, while analyzing the project scope to ensure U.S. State Department diplomatic objectives were fulfilled while managing budget administration for each project to ensure federal program compliance. In this role, I frequently arranged meetings with local, state and federal government officials, including City Council members and mayors, to provide a local policy perspective for visiting international professionals. Secondly, my business and organizational leadership demonstrates my qualifications for the Planning Commission. My MBA and career in healthcare IT and business development gave me experince in market analysis, contract negotiation and organizational decision-making in regulated industries. I have managed budgets, led teams, and built partnerships across public and private sectors. I also understand how development economics work and how private interests intersect with public policy, all useful background while evaluating project proposals. Third, I began my carer as a public school teacher in Minnesota, an experience that shaped my commitment to public institutions and the communities they serve. While there, I was active in the nonpartisan Civic League public policy study organization and served as the University of Phoenix’s representative to the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce in St. Paul, MN. My subsequent civic leadership as President of the Rotary Club of Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., involvement with the Rotary Club of San Mateo, my current membership in the Rotary Cub of San Francisco, membership in the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce and leadership with the University of Minnesota Bay Area Alumni network reflect my consistent commitment to civic investment in the public and private sectors across every city I have called home. San Mateo is now that city. My resume is attached for the City Council’s review.

Graduate of:

Certified/Agreed
2026-04-23
Submitted By Date

21 of 153

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

22 of 153

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
General Plan 2040 is the governing policy for every physical change to the city that the Planning Commission reviews. It is the legal and and analytical foundation for which applications for development, zoning changes, and variances are evaluated. The General Plan is the guidance which determines whether proposals are congruent with San Mateo’s development vision or not. The General Plan was adopted by the City Council in the spring of 2024 and was affirmed by San Mateo voters in November of that year. The Planning Commission’s charge is to implement the city’s plan, not change the vision. The General Plan’s three themes for the city are sustainability, environmental justice and community engagement. On a practical level, the General Plan emphasizes higher density residential neighborhoods and mixed-use development in 10 Study Areas near the 3 Caltrain stops along the El Camino: Downtown, Hayward Park and Hillsdale. At the same time, the General Plan highlights the importance of protecting the character of established lower-density neighborhoods. It emphasizes transit growth, historical protection where established criteria are met and culturally inclusive community outreach. Importantly, the plan accommodates up to 19,764 units of new housing and 3.2 million square feet of of new offices and retail space through 2040. I have read the General Plan and understand it well, including the 10 Study Areas, the priority community designations and the relationship between the Land Use Map and Zoning Code. I am well prepared to use the General Plan as the primary analytical tool through my seat on the Planning Commission.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
I understand that state housing law, such as the Housing Element Law, establishes housing growth that local governments must meet. General Plan 2040 recognizes this and adopts it for San Mateo. When reviewing development proposals, the role of the Planning Commission is to listen to public input and act impartially to approve proposals that follow applicable laws and to deny those that do not.

Throughout the process, the Planning Commission must factor in the concerns and support of the community for each plan and weigh it in their analysis. Though local judgement has been reduced, the Planning Commission retains authority over design quality, site planning, environmental review and compliance with local development standards. Smart growth for San Mateo’s housing needs as envisioned by General Plan 2040 must be maintained while the interests and the concerns of the community over issues such as neighborhood character, traffic, parking, historical preservation and tree removal should be considered by the Planning Commission. Regardless of the outcome, the Planning Commission should ensure that the objections and support for each proposal are heard and that public participation is encouraged while impartially evaluating each proposal. Regarding my personal views, my role on the Planning Commission would be to evaluate housing proposals against the adopted General Plan 2040 standards and applicable laws. I have personal preferences on housing design, density, neighborhood character and transit that I formed through my professional experience, civic engagement

23 of 153

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]
and as a homeowner. But those preferences will not supersede San Mateo’s General Plan 2040, zoning code or applicable state law. This is the commitment I am making by seeking this Planning Commission appointment.

24 of 153

JAMES HORSMAN, MBA, MAAIS
| | San Mateo, CA | LinkedIn

PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY
Public policy professional with over 15 years of experience in, policy analysis, government relations, advocacy and stakeholder engagement. Proven ability to manage complex workstreams, convene senior business and government leaders and produce clear, persuasive communications for diverse audiences. Background spanning federal policy, State Department international exchange programs and business development demonstrating success coordinating multi-stakeholder initiatives, program leadership and representing organizations in government settings. Deep commitment to the local civic and business community.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Senior Policy & Acquisitions Analyst
MicroHealth (Federal Contractor) | Washington, DC Apr 2022 – Feb 2026 (contract ended) Federal Policy | Legislative Process | Government Affairs • Maintained fully vetted federal Public Trust security clearance, reflecting highest standards of integrity in government partnership contexts
• Created enterprise technology policy and advised senior government officials on IT governance and business operations within FEMA headquarters Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO) • Presented policy recommendations in high-stakes environments demonstrating clear, persuasive strategic messaging skills in high-stakes environments
• Authored and modernized IT policy frameworks and Standard Operating Procedures using advanced writing capabilities to translate complex regulatory requirements into actionable organizational guidance • Early adopter of AI programs as a work efficiency assistant and layout consultant to focus my time on strategic priorities • Monitored evolving federal legislative and administrative landscapes, tracking legislative and administrative changes relevant to program operations and producing regular concise summaries for leadership, directly parallel to producing a weekly policy digest
• Led cybersecurity and governance reviews, coordinating across internal teams and external stakeholders to ensure compliance, demonstrating project management and multi-workstream coordination • Navigated federal bureaucracy and complex stakeholder dynamics to advance OCIO technology modernization initiatives • Project Management Professional and ITIL4 certifications in progress IVLP Program Officer
World Learning | Washington, DC Sep 2018 – Apr 2022
International Exchange | Government Relations | Programming & Advocacy • Designed and managed implementation and evaluation of U.S. State Department International Visitor Leadership Program (IVLP) exchanges, managing federal diplomatic priorities and multi-stakeholder relationships with Congressional offices, Congressional committee staff, federal agencies, embassies, governors, state legislators, mayors, nonprofit and community leaders across the political spectrum
• Primary liaison to U.S. House and Senate offices, State Department Program Officers, advocacy organizations, academic experts and elected officials by coordinating their participation in high-level programming briefings representing the broad diversity of thought and perspective throughout the United States • Selected for the Alliance for International Exchange Advocacy Day to educate elected Congressional officials and staff about success stories of international exchanger participants and community economic impact of hosting international visitors, representing World Learning's programs directly to federal, state and local officials and drafting impact materials for government and member audiences
• Designed and executed public policy development projects aligned to federal program objectives and budget parameters, managing budget and contract closeout processes with the U.S. State Department in compliance with federal appropriations requirements
• Managed cross-functional stakeholder communications, cultivating relationships with partner organizations, community leaders and intergovernmental contacts to strengthen organizational international exchange program advocacy • Managed and led program associate and intern teams toward professional development goals, promoting a culture of collaboration and inclusive communication
• Championed a collaborative, inclusive team culture that fostered innovation, elevating cross-functional project initiatives

25 of 153

Account Manager
Virtual Radiologic | Minneapolis, MN Jun 2015 – May 2017 Partnership Development | Revenue Generation | Stakeholder Engagement • Developed service proposals and partnership agreements for hospital systems and physician groups, exceeding sales/revenue goals in both 2015 and 2016 fiscal years and achieving #1 and #2 territory retention rankings • Conducted data-driven market research and analysis to identify and pursue new business opportunities, directly supporting revenue generation and sponsorship-style stakeholder outreach • Educated internal teams and leadership on market insights and business trends, demonstrating ability to translate complex information for diverse audiences
• Developed business process workflow improvements in a regulated environment to maximize business growth • Leveraged CRM systems to manage customer budgets and patient data, including PII • Collaborated with internal and client IT departments to coordinate technology needs, resources and data security requirements for new radiology clients
• Researched client issues for the Northeast (U.S.) territory on imaging and billing and provided solutions based on detailed analysis of customer data
• Partnered with radiologists and hospital IT departments to diagnose and resolve customer issues

ADDITIONAL EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
Client Development Associate, Dale Carnegie Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN | 2013–2015 Senior Enrollment Advisor / Team Lead, University of Phoenix, Minneapolis, MN | 2006–2013 Center Director, Sylvan Learning Center, Minneapolis, MN | 2005–2006 Middle School Social Studies Teacher, Albertville & Wayzata Public Schools, Minneapolis, MN | 2001–2005

EDUCATION
MBA, Business Development & Program Management, University of Phoenix MA, Applied International Studies, University of Washington BA, Political Science & Education, University of Minnesota

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS & CIVIC ENGAGEMENT
• Member, Rotary Club of San Francisco (2026 – present) • City Council Appointee, Potomac Yard Design Advisory Committee planning commission, City of Alexandria, VA (2021– 2023)
• President & Service Projects Committee Chair, Rotary Club of Capitol Hill, Washington, DC (2020–2022) • Liaison, Ghana Water, Sanitation & Health Project, Rotary Club of Capitol Hill, Washington, DC (2021–2026) • Member, World Learning Toastmasters Club, Washington, DC (2018–2021) • President, Twin Cities Rotaract Club, St. Paul, MN
• Member, Rotary Group Study Exchange Team to Sweden, Minneapolis, MN (2014) • Member, Citizens League (2010–2017), St. Paul, MN

26 of 153

CITY OF SAN MATEO

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Name: Stephen ONeill
Email:

Primary
Phone:

Address: San Mateo 94405
Street City Zip Code
San Mateo resident
since: 1987 I am a registered voter in City of San Mateo: Yes Board or Commission interested in serving on (check all that apply):

Did you attend a meeting for this Board or
Commission?: Yes

QUALIFICATIONS
My qualifications for serving on this board/commission are as follows: Civil Engineer fifty years of experience in design and construction of roads buildings, bridges and public facilities. Served as Harbor Engineer for Los Angeles County,as well as engineer of SFO expansion 2000 and 2010, East span Bay Bridge construction. Familar with re-routing traffic in congested urban areas
I want to serve on this board/commission because: I am interested in traffic patterns and role of infrastructure in New commercial building , repair and modification of streets,and other issues relating to new and remodel residential construction.

Please list any other background information (business, education, community involvement) which might be useful in considering your appointment and attach a resume: BSCE San Jose State College Civil Engineering courses at Stanford Graduate of:

27 of 153

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

Certified/Agreed
2026-04-29
Submitted By Date

28 of 153

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
General plan sets general parameters for growth, especially in land use decisions. The Caltrain rail electrification project mandated high density housing near the train to facilitate its use. As land values increase taller structures will be required in accordance with the general plan. The general plan also effects infrastructure planning and use

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
Dense housing adjacent to Caltrain tracks can provide additional housing close to public transit. Re developing shopping centers to reflect new usage patterns with housing above retail can revitalize streets and neighborhoods. Assisting owners in developing ADU's may spur children to live in house while parents move to ADU's. I support modernization to invigorate our city

29 of 153

Stephen B. O’Neill, CCE, PMP
Construction Cost Estimator
Stephen B. O’Neill, CCE, PMP - Page 1 of 2
Project
Experience:

Project
Experience(
BART Silicon
Valle
Extension
Phase I
BART Silicon
Valley
Extension
Phase II
(Conceptual
and
preliminary
engineering
estimates
only)
Installation
of High
Voltage
electrical
feeder
cables
(Project
Engineer)
Replacement of 35kv high voltage line Balboa Street Station to Daly City (Project Engineer)

SF MTA projects
Downtown track extension project, Two track costs Conceptual and Force account engineer’s estimate SFO Projects
SFO Air train Construction Estimates and Construction Change order estimates and negotiation of Change Order estimates
Sound Transit Projects
East Link Light Rail Project, Seattle, WA
WashDot
Alaska way Viaduct SR 99
San Diego Associations of Governments
Mid Corridor Light Rail Project, San Diego, CA
Caltrain
Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project, SF Peninsula, CA California High Speed Rail
Contract Package No 1
Summary:

Stephen O’Neill has over 50 years of engineering and construction experience in transportation, large infrastructure and institutional facilities projects. His specialty is in construction cost estimating including conceptual and independent change order estimates, and hard bid. His experinece includes Tunnel construction Station Construction ,Track installation, High voltage traction power installation, and control systems . He is also very familiar with Bridges, working an estimator on Cast in place post tensionsed concrete bridges, Cast in place segmental bridges, Precast bridges and self anchoring span steel bridges. He has extensive experience estimating Caltrans type projects specifically Freeway interchainge projects, grade separation projects and Maintenance Station projects for heavy civil work projects.

Years of Experience: 50
Education:

BS, Civil Engineering, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA Publications:

Data Collection Automation using Everyday Tools, AACE international Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX (July 2012)
Steel Fabrication Costs in China, Cost Engineering Journal (September 2010) Repair of Marina Del Rey Seawall using advanced pulse echo system to reduce repair costs( American Society of Civil Engineers September 1992) Software/Applications Skills:

Proficient in Microsoft Office applications, @riisk software for Monte Carlo Simulations

30 of 153

Stephen B. O’Neill, CCE, PMP
Construction Cost Estimator

Stephen B. O’Neill, CCE, PMP - Page 2 of 2
Caltrans
Benicia Bridge replacement project
Carquinez bridge replacement project
East Bay Bridge Replacement Project
FASTTRAC installation Walnut Creek to Pleasanton
Orange County Transit Agency
Sand Hill grade separation project
State Street Grade separation project
Fullerton Avenue Grade separation project
Other ( Bechtel Projects)
Newmont Mining Company Carlin, Oxidation Plant, Carlin Nevada Newmont Mining Company Uzbekistan Gold Ore Tailings Recovery Plant Estimate skills
Conceptual estimates
Budget estimates
Control estimates Force account detailed estimates ( Crew based ) Cost coding
Civil work manhours and unit costs including TBM and Segmental methods .

Composite craft crew rate build- up
Indirect field cost build -up
Equipment erection manhours and material costs
Electrical work manhours and materials costs
Risk analysis and contingency analysis using Monte Carlo Simulations

31 of 153

CITY OF SAN MATEO

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Name: Seema Patel
Email:

Primary
Phone:

Address: San Mateo 94402
Street City Zip Code
San Mateo resident
since: 2013 I am a registered voter in City of San Mateo: Yes Board or Commission interested in serving on (check all that apply):

Did you attend a meeting for this Board or
Commission?: Yes

QUALIFICATIONS
My qualifications for serving on this board/commission are as follows: I am currently serving on the Planning Commission, where I have spent the past five years bringing a rigorous, data-driven, and highly researched approach to every policy and project we review. During my first term, I actively worked on some of our City’s most significant long-term policies, including our General Plan, Cycle 6 Housing Element, ADU Ordinance, Objective Design Standards for Multi-family and Residential Mixed-use Projects, and the by-right Housing Opportunity Overlay District Ordinance. I pride myself on digging into the details; for instance, when working on the Overlay District, I manually cross-checked the APNs against the Cycle 5 and Cycle 6 site inventories and identified eight eligible parcels that had been inadvertently left off the list. My meticulous approach resulted in the list of eligible parcels increasing by 20%. More recently, I helped update our Historic Preservation Ordinance, successfully navigating a highly complex community conversation to provide a clear pathway for preserving our local history while respecting property owners' rights, and suggesting updates to our Mills Act Ordinance that would ensure the community has access to our rich history.

I want to serve on this board/commission because: I put down roots in San Mateo 12 years ago, choosing to raise my family here. Decisions made by this Commission will shape the city my children (and my neighbors’ children) grow up in long after my term ends and I take that responsibility seriously. Serving on the Planning Commission has been one of the most meaningful things I've done as a San Mateo resident. I came onto the dais five years ago expecting to learn the technical side of land use; what I didn't expect was how much I would come to value the deliberative work itself – reading every staff report and packet carefully, listening to residents and applicants on every side of an issue, and trying to apply our adopted standards as objectively as I can. I'm seeking reappointment because I want to see foundational work like the General Plan and Housing Element through to implementation, and because I've found that this kind of careful, unglamorous civic work is something I'm genuinely good at and committed to. Comprehensive policies take years to develop – the General Plan alone took six years to create – and decades to execute. Currently, three of our Planning Commissioners have served for less than two years, and our fourth will reach her term limit in 2027. Amidst this transition, coupled with natural staff turnover, retaining institutional memory is critical. I want to continue serving to provide stability, preserve the historical context and legislative intent behind our recent policy decisions as we embark on significant projects like the comprehensive zoning code update, and ensure a seamless transition as newer Commissioners get fully up to speed.

32 of 153

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]
Please list any other background information (business, education, community involvement) which might be useful in considering your appointment and attach a resume: Professionally, I am a tech leader and versatile executive producer passionate about creating built environments that deliver amazing experiences to communities. My background includes running a robotics startup and leading the design and construction of publicly accessible spaces at Google. As a Planning Commissioner, I am deeply committed to ongoing education and building community among local policymakers. Over the last five years, I have actively participated in 21 Elements training workshops and attended the CA Planning Commissioners Academy twice. To ensure our dais benefits from statewide best practices, I created an informal brain trust of approximately 30 California Planning Commissioners to share data and advice – such as comparing ADU height limits across local jurisdictions to inform San Mateo’s ordinance. I have also shared my own lessons learned by presenting on the "Planning Commissioners 101" panel at the Academy (with my slides later used in municipal trainings) and by personally meeting with and onboarding newly appointed San Mateo Planning Commissioners. I have also participated in a range of educational forums on housing policy, including panels hosted by the Housing Leadership Council and informational sessions on recent state legislation such as SB 4, in order to understand multiple perspectives on implementation. Beyond the Planning Commission, I am a graduate of the San Mateo City Services Academy, the San Mateo Community Police Academy and the San Mateo County Leadership CORPS. I currently serve on the San Mateo Civic Arts Committee and the San Mateo County Transit District Measure W Citizens Oversight Committee, and previously served on the Boards of the San Mateo County AAPI Alliance and the League of Women Voters of North & Central San Mateo County.

Graduate of:City Services Academy 2022
By checking the box below, I hereby certify that all statements made in this application are true and I authorize investigation of all matters contained in the application. I acknowledge that any false statements or misrepresentation on this application will be cause for refusal of placement or immediate dismissal at any time during the period of my placement. I understand that the City of San Mateo is an Equal Opportunity Employer and this application is public.

Certified/Agreed
2026-04-30
Submitted By Date

33 of 153

Please mail or submit this application to the San Mateo City Clerk’s Office:

City Clerk's Office, 330 W. 20th Avenue, San Mateo, CA 94403, (650) 522-7040, [email protected]

SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE

PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICANTS

1. What is your understanding of the General Plan and its role in shaping San Mateo’s land use decisions and the future built environment?
The General Plan serves as a vision for how San Mateo will look, feel and evolve over the next 20 years.

Having served on the General Plan Subcommittee during my first term, I have an intimate understanding of this document. It serves as our "Constitution" for land use, mandating how land is allocated, where transportation infrastructure is prioritized, how natural resources are protected, and how we will equitably accommodate future population and housing growth. All subsequent land use decisions, zoning updates, and specific development approvals must be legally consistent with the policies outlined in the General Plan. It is the ultimate tool we use to ensure our city grows predictably, sustainably, and in a balanced manner that reflects our community’s vision. The General Plan articulates a broad set of community values – including environmental stewardship, community engagement, sustainability, economic prosperity, inclusivity, resiliency, and balance. I am committed to applying each of these faithfully as adopted by the City Council and the residents who shaped the document. As we move forward with executing our Housing Element and General Plan policies and actions, the Commission will need experienced members who understand the complexities of these documents and can ensure they are applied fairly and effectively to our built environment. I am eager to continue contributing my time, expertise, and collaborative approach to this critical work.

When reviewing development proposals, how would you balance the interests of the community with the requirements of the state to promote new housing, and plan for future housing needs? How would your personal view factor into your decision?
The role of a Commissioner is to serve the entire community, not a specific cause or interest group. As I have demonstrated over my first term, my personal views do not factor into my decisions; I evaluate every development proposal under consideration based on the city's objective requirements as well as state law. Balancing community interests with state mandates requires strict adherence to the law and a commitment to objective standards. When evaluating development proposals, my focus is on ensuring the project complies with the vision codified by our residents in the General Plan, the requirements of our state certified Housing Element, and our locally adopted objective requirements and design standards. When state mandates limit our local discretion, it is the Planning Commission's responsibility to clearly communicate those legal boundaries to the public while working constructively with applicants to achieve the best outcomes for both the project and the community within the framework of our adopted standards. When discretion is permitted I rely on community input – I always carefully read or listen to every public comment submitted and consult the most recent True North Community Opinion Survey – when making a decision.

34 of 153

35 of 153

complex, sophisticated spaces leverage Google technology to inspire and educate top clients, partners, government oﬃcials and community members.
● Grew the team from 3 engineers to 30+ experience designers, creative technologists, and technical specialists — building the hiring bar, culture, and creative standards from the ground up ● Led the design and construction of Experience Centers ○ Built a team of contractors (experience design ﬁrm, architect, MEP designer, lighting designer, AV designer, exhibits designer, media agency, GC, etc.) and cross-functional partners and managed them through the entire project pipeline from discovery through delivery ○ Identiﬁed success criteria, established priorities, developed the creative vision for the guest experience, and provided creative direction on all aspects of design ○ Conducted intensive research on business goals, priorities and programs to translate business needs into design intent
○ Managed project schedule and budget, navigating risks and leading through surprises ○ Managed communications with business stakeholders and executive leadership ● Developed infrastructure, processes and standards for the design and construction of story-driven interactive spaces at Google. Educated executive leadership, business stakeholders and cross functional partners on these practices, driving their adoption.

Interbots LLC CEO
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania January 2006 – May 2013
Founded and ran a robotics startup that created emotionally expressive interactive robots and accompanying mobile experiences for clients including Hasbro and major science museums – exploring how technology can create genuine human connection.

Key Projects included:
● Popchilla, a robotic therapy system that combines mobile games, interactive robots, and a data tracking service to help children with autism practice important life skills through interactive play. ● Quasi, a sophisticated emotionally expressive animatronic robot that entertains and educates audiences around the globe.

Walt Disney Imagineering Research & Development Intern
Glendale, California September – December 2005
● Designed and prototyped interactive attractions for a location-based mobile adventure game within an interdisciplinary R&D team

EDUCATION
Carnegie Mellon University: Master’s of Entertainment Technology University of South Florida: Master’s of Computer Science Harvey Mudd College: Bachelor of Science in Physics and Bachelor of Science in Psychology Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology

SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS
Global Association of Customer Engagement Professionals Spring Conference (2019, 2022, 2025) California Planning Commissioner's Academy (2025)
Infocomm (2022)

36 of 153

SKILLS
Developing strategic plans and driving alignment and approval across cross-functional leaders Eﬃciently managing a large team of internal stakeholders and external contractors on concurrent complex, interdisciplinary projects
Attention to detail, leading teams to produce polished products with a high-quality user experience while working within schedule, budget and technical constraints Communication at all levels, from executive presentations to detailed technical speciﬁcations Proﬁcient in Google AI products including Gemini, Imagen, and Veo Capable with Adobe Creative Suite including Photoshop and Illustrator

HONORS & AWARDS
Housing Leader Award, Housing Leadership Council of San Mateo County (October 2022) World Class Center, Association of Brieﬁng Program Managers (July 2020) Global Brander Award, Google Global Brand Solutions (May 2014) 2nd Place, Eureka Park Challenge, Consumer Electronics Association (June 2012)

PUBLIC SERVICE
Planning Commissioner, City of San Mateo (June 2021 – present) Civic Arts Committee, City of San Mateo (July 2022 – present) Measure W Citizens Oversight Committee, San Mateo County Transit District (January 2025 – present) Member, Board of League of Women Voters of North & Central San Mateo County (July 2023 – June 2025)
Member, Executive Board, San Mateo County AAPI Alliance (September 2023 – August 2024) General Plan Subcommittee, City of San Mateo (March 2022 – August 2023) Community Relations Commissioner, City of San Mateo (February 2021 – June 2021)

37 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Ruth Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 3:57 PM
To: Clerk
Subject: Seema Patel reappointment
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

I am wriƟng to strongly urge you to reappoint Seema Patel to the San Mateo Planning Commission.

I spoke with her brieﬂy aŌer a recent City Council meeƟng and was very impressed with her warm, open aƫtude; command of the issues; and commitment to making a posiƟve diﬀerence in the lives of the residents of San Mateo.

I think Seema Patel serving a second term on the Planning Commission will be a great beneﬁt to us all as the City navigates ongoing and future challenges.

Sincerely,
Ruth Anderson

San Mateo, CA 94404

Sent from my iPhone

38 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: deborah athens
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 9:30 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Cc: Doug D'Anna
Subject: Endorsement: Tom Braham for San Mateo Planning Commission Dear Members of the San Mateo City Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for Tom Braham and his appointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission. At a time when our city faces important decisions about housing, growth, and neighborhood character, we need Commissioners who understand both preservation and thoughtful progress. Tom brings exactly that balance.

Key reasons I support his appointment:
 Distinguished professional standing: Fellow of the American Institute of Architects, one of the profession’s highest honors.
 Deep experience: More than 30 years designing major civic, academic, corporate, and healthcare projects nationwide.
 Proven leadership: Led studios of up to 40 architects at Gensler, one of the world’s leading design firms.
 Policy and governance expertise: Former President of AIA Illinois and member of the AIA National Board of Directors.
 California planning experience: Navigated real planning and entitlement processes in Sunnyvale, San Bruno, and Napa.
 Serious commitment to San Mateo: Studied the Strive San Mateo General Plan in detail, including specific Planning Commission meetings.
 Grounded in preservation: His first professional project was the renovation of a historic courthouse—preservation has been part of his work from the beginning. As a Glazenwood resident and strong supporter of our neighborhood, Tom was also an active force in helping secure Glazenwood's Historic District Preservation vote. This is yet anther proof point of his dedication to our community and to San Mateo's positive growth and future.

Tom listens, he prepares, and he understands what is at stake for communities like ours. I have full confidence in his judgment and his commitment to San Mateo.

Thank you for considering his appointment.

Sincerely,

Deborah Athens
A Glazenwood, San Mateo resident of 30 years

39 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Rick Ballard
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 9:57 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Please re-appont Seema Patel to Planning Commission Dear City Council,

I’m wriƟng to ask that you re-appoint Seema Patel to the San Mateo Planning Commission.

Seema brings umparalleled experience, dedicaƟon, and knowledge to this role. She’s as inspiraƟonal and dedicated a public servant as I can imagine. I've been consistantly impressed by the hard work she puts in, and by how smart, skilled, and insighƞul she is working on city issues.

Seema is by far the most qualiﬁed candidate applying for this role. Please make your choice accordingly.

Thank you very much,
Rick Ballard,
North-Central San Mateo resident

40 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Mignon Belongie
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2026 10:14 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

[I apologize for not taking the time to write my own letter, but the following is essentially what I would have written if I had the time and writing skill.]

What sets Seema apart is her analytical rigor and deep subject matter expertise. Whether she is reviewing the Cycle 6 Housing Element, updating the ADU Ordinance, or meticulously cross-checking parcel data to expand the Housing Opportunity Overlay District, she brings a data-driven, problem- solving mindset to the dais. She consistently dives into the granular details to ensure every policy practically serves San Mateo's future.

Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By carefully listeni ng to public input and relying on
objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups.

Seema’s proven leadership as Chair and her unwavering commitment to our city's balanced growth make her an invaluable asset to the Commission. I strongly urge you to reappoint her for a second term.

Sincerely,

Mignon Belongie

San Mateo, CA 94403

41 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Tim Bickel
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 1:15 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: San Mateo City Council - Please Prioritize Safety First for Bicyclists!! Yes, San Mateo City Council - I couldn’t agree more!

Subject: Strong Support for Seema Patel’s Reappointment to the Planning Commission

Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

What sets Seema apart is her analytical rigor and deep subject matter expertise. Whether she is reviewing the Cycle 6 Housing Element, updating the ADU Ordinance, or meticulously cross-checking parcel data to expand the Housing Opportunity Overlay District, she brings a data-driven, problem-solving mindset to the dais. She consistently dives into the granular details to ensure every policy practically serves San Mateo's future.

Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By carefully listening to public input and relying on objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups.

Sincerely,

Tim Bickel
Marina Gardens San Mateo Resident

42 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Helaine Blumenthal
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 3:21 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Cc: Daniel Schonberg
Subject: Writing in support of Seema Patel's reappointment to the planning commission Hello,

I'm writing to express my fervent support of Seema Patel's reappointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission.

Seema brings not just her expertise and experience to the commission but her passion for this community. She's an advocate for all residents of San Mateo irrespective of whether they own a home or rent.

I know that Seema has done the hard work to understand both housing policy as well as the needs of San Mateo residents and does her best to balance a range of sometimes differing perspectives. In addition to being fair and kind, Seema is genuinely committed to seeing that the housing needs of all San Mateo residents are met.

I truly hope that the council decides to reappoint Seema to the Planning Commission. Her departure would be a great loss for our city.

Best Regards,
Helaine Blumenthal

43 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Rick Bonilla
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2026 3:48 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo); Zachary Dahl; Alex Khojikian; Clerk Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

Before you tonight, seeking reappointment to the planning commission, is Seema Patel. Seema is undoubtedly the best prepared and most accomplished planning commissioner and Candidate for reappointment that the City Of San Mateo has ever seen. Seema understands that when we collectively plan for housing, transportation, climate and jobs we have a better outcome for all of the above and our entire community benefits in the most outstanding ways. San Mateo has some very high standards to maintain, and I would suggest that reappointing Seema to remain on the planning commission is an important step in that direction. I strongly the urge reappointment of Seema Patel to San Mateo planning commission.

Whether she is reviewing the Cycle 6 Housing Element, updating the ADU Ordinance, or meticulously cross-checking parcel data to expand the Housing Opportunity Overlay District, she brings a data- driven,
problem-solving mindset to the dais. She consistently dives into the granular details to ensure every policy practically serves San Mateo's future. Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By carefully listening to public input and relying on objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups. Seema’s proven leadership as Chair and her unwavering commitment to our city's balanced growth make her an invaluable asset to the Commission. I strongly urge you to reappoint her for a second term.

Sincerely,

Rick Bonilla

44 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: joyce burns
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 7:32 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Cc: Martin McTaggart
Subject: Appointment of a Planning Commissioner

To San Mateo City Council members regarding the appointment of a Planning Commissioner:

It is important that you choose a person who has integrity working for the people of San Mateo and someone who has earned the community’s trust, works well with them and communicates with them. We, the people, want someone who is looking out for our and our city’s best long-term interest not someone who appeases supporters/ﬁnanciers and is concerned about self-aggrandizement. It is Ɵme to NOT reappoint Seema Patel but to select someone who will be beƩer for our city and the people.

Thank you for your consideraƟon,
Joyce and Leo Burns

San Mateo 94403

45 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Linda
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 5:38 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

I am writing to express my strong support for Seema Patel's reappointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission.

Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By care fully listening to public input and relying on
objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups.

Sincerely,
Linda Chen

46 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Nicole Cherok
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 9:50 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Seema Patel
Dear City Councilmembers,

I'm writing to ask you to NOT reappoint Seems Patel to the Planning Commission.

Her lack of knowledge and her incompetence in pursuing policies which do not support the majority opinion of the residents of our town is overwhelming.

Examples:

2/2025 Humboldt Bike Lane Fiasco (removing 200 parking spaces from underserved neighborhood, elderly, minority constituents): The concerns raised by the author/resident Trina about the bike lanes are centered on community impact, safety, and accessibility. It is not some secret agenda nor a financial motive. Seema dismissing valid concerns as merely "anti-bike" is an oversimplification that ignores the real issues at stake. Note: Now this is costing US $10 million to fix!)

Regarding ADU’s/Granny Units Jan 2022 - The new City ADU/JADU ordinance has already started coming together as far as square footage. Shortly, the height recommendation will be added - with Commissioners John Ebneter and Seema Patel, along with the rest of the Planning Commission, pushing for two of the highest choices out of the 3 under review. A City staffer noted that surrounding cities seem to want to stay with the State maximum - but not San Mateo. I also found it interesting in watching the Aug 2021 Planning Commission meeting on this subject that Commissioner Seema Patel looked back on the community input given (in July-Aug 2021 at request of the Council) and felt that they shouldn't 'take it too strongly' since the City didn't require attendees to state their race, age, renter/homeowner status, etc. and therefore the 298 responses would be unknown as representative of the community as a whole.

12/272020 Seema Patel didn't realize that upzoning R-1s would increase land values - she actually wanted it to occur to reduce the price of homes without realizing it would raise the price by approximately 50% overnight

Sincerely,
Dr. Nicole Cherok

Cherok Chiropractic

San Mateo, CA 94403

47 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: AJ
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 11:08 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Strong Support for Seema Patel’s Reappointment to the Planning Commission Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

Sincerely,

AJ cho

48 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Dave Clark
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2026 11:19 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

I am writing to express my strong support for Seema Patel's reappointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission.

The opinions of the nextdoor NIMBYs are harmful to the city and laced with misinformation and vitriol. Their vitriolic protests against development often lack truth. As an example, their foam model of the mall redevelopment lists no sources, and their claims vary widely from one meeting to another. At one point they labelled Adam Lorraine as a “carpet bagger”. At best their arguments are lazy and misinformed wishing to revert to 1980 and make San Mateo Great Again. The NIMBYs are a huge obstacle that city planners must work around. This is not because all of their arguments are invalid, but because they approach the topics with bitter gut level feelings instead of current facts.

I’ve supported SSMC staff on research for several topics including housing, and I’ve contributed to the Plan 2030 and Plan 2040 meetings. I’ve seen that bright, well-informed people do contribute to the health of any city. We need a young voice of reason that understands how government works, one that stands behind science-based reality and modern civic policy. I’ve known other planning commissioners through the years; the role requires a lot of diligent research and is hard work. Seema has achieved a lot in her time and will be a vital asset as her vision looks not backwards but towards generations many decades from our present.

Sincerely,

Dave Clark

49 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From:

Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 3:37 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Subject: Do Not Reappoint Seema Patel to the Planning Commission

Honorable Members of the Planning Commission Selection
Committee:

As a founding member of Ethics San Mateo, I have been the target of personal attacks by Seema Patel on numerous and well documented occasions. Her focused attacks are surely because I have publicly identified her as being so biased that she should never have been appointed to the Planning Commission in the first place.

Ms. Patel may have the right to her opinions and to speak under the protections of the First Amendment; however, she does not have the right to hold and demonstrate bias contrary to the published requirements of being fair and impartial and serve on the Planning Commission. It’s not that she is speaking; it’s that the content, methods, and intensity of her spoken and written words demonstrate unrestrained bias. She has used any opportunity to denigrate those who oppose her.

Her use of social media, both private groups and publicly accessible, show a clear and consistent pattern of staying just within momentary boundaries, while twisting words of others to fit her agenda while attacking opponents with reprehensible personal comments.

Her use of a child as a shield as she sexualized them is simply horrific.

50 of 153

2 Although her identity was thinly hidden as a “representative of YIMBY Action”, I believe she, and a close sycophant, was behind a hit piece “News Story” attack on Ethics San Mateo shopped to at least one regional news group. The attempt failed in getting the accusations published in credible media.

You simply cannot allow her to cover the city with her toxic cloud.

There are more qualified candidates before you.

Do you want to be playing political theater or do what’s best for the city?

The moment for bold leadership is now. Do not reappoint Seema Patel to the Planning Commission.

Regards,

Dave Cohen

51 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Kevin Cullinane
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 12:21 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel - San Mateo Planning Commission Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

I am pleased to share my strong support for Seema Patel's reappointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission.

Having observed her work closely, I can attest that Seema consistently brings a remarkable level of preparation and expertise to her role. She deeply understands state housing law, local zoning regulations, the Housing Element, and related planning frameworks. What sets her apart is her habit of thoroughly reviewing materials independently, rather than relying solely on summaries or staff suggestions.

This level of diligence and knowledge is uncommon among volunteers and is truly valuable as our city faces ever more complex planning challenges. Having personally worked with the planning commissioners in Belmont, Burlingame, San Mateo, Millbrae, and San Carlos over the years, I can't tell you how important it is to have someone like Seema on the commission.

I sincerely encourage the Council to reappoint Seema Patel to the Planning Commission.

Sincerely,

Kevin Cullinane
SC Properties Owner
San Mateo City Resident for 40+ years.

52 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Jean Dail
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 7:30 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Please consider NOT re-appointing S. Patel for the Planning Commision Honorable San Mateo City Council Members:

Seema Patel’s past behavior and actions are questionable as being in the best interests for the City of San Mateo.

Supporting the removal of necessary parking on Humboldt for bike lanes that now must be removed costing millions.

Starting in 2021 supporting higher building limits than Measure Y allowed ??? the foretelling of where we are now. Along with “let’s support ripping housing decisions away from local control” and following Wiener down the more and more and more housing rabbit hole. (With almost no consideration of additional traffic congestion).

Who you keep company with matters. Seema Patel’s support of Amorence Lee including taking Lee’s “look at me, the mayor” photo is unprofessional and juvenile.

Do we really want to continue Patel’s career in our city’s governance??? Please consider the character and credentials of those being appointed to leadership positions.

Sincerely, Jean Dail

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad

53 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Doug D'Anna
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 3:16 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo); Clerk
Subject: Re: A conflict of interest the Council must address before the Planning Commission vote

Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

Nobody seems to be asking a simple question about the current Planning Commission appointment process:

Why is a candidate running for City Council interviewing for a commission seat at the same time?

If she wins the Council race in November, the commission seat is moot.

If she loses, she lands back on the commission with four more years of appointed service in the very district she is asking voters to entrust to her.

Is this public service — or a safety net?

The Planning Commission makes binding decisions about what gets built in San Mateo, how tall, and how dense. It deserves someone whose only agenda is San Mateo — not a candidate pursuing two simultaneous bids for public office.

San Mateo has other qualified candidates for this seat — without these conflicts.

San Mateo deserves the best one.

Sincerely,
Doug D'Anna
San Mateo

54 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Doug D'Anna
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 12:48 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo); Zachary Dahl; Clerk
Subject: Tom Braham Belongs on San Mateo's Planning Commission Mayor, Council, and Staff,

Here's what San Mateo needs on its Planning Commission: someone who actually knows how planning works.

Tom Braham does.

He's an architect with more than 30 years of experience navigating California's planning and entitlement processes. He's a Fellow of the American Institute of Architects — that's the profession's highest honor. He has led government advocacy work at the state and national level.

That's not a resume. That's rare.

I've watched Tom show up for this community — at neighborhood meetings, at council sessions, in letters to the editor — not because he had to, but because he cares.

He moved here and invested here. That matters. San Mateo would be lucky to have him.

Sincerely,

Doug D’Anna

55 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Doug D'Anna
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 7:24 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo); Clerk
Subject: The One Planning Commission Candidate No One Can Argue With and Why Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,
Six candidates tonight. Five come without controversy and political baggage.

Thomas Braham is one of those five — and he has rock star status in the architectural world.
 Fellow of the American Institute of Architects
 Thirty years at three of the most prestigious firms in the world  AIA National Board of Directors
His superpower is contextual design — making new buildings fit their surroundings rather than clash with them.

No one else on this list has these credentials.

San Mateo faces pressure to build thousands of new units. This expertise is needed now more than ever.

San Mateo deserves the best planner — not a politician. That planner is Thomas Braham.

Sincerely,
Doug D'Anna

56 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Richard Delaney
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 7:52 AM
To: Clerk
Subject: Seema Patel
I have noƟced Seema in acƟon at several planning discussions. She seems to have a good grasp of the issues and a logical approach to soluƟons. I would urge all to approve her appointment renewal.

57 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Ann Dorsey
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 8:22 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Please reappoint Seema Patel to the San Mateo Planning Commission Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

I urge you to reappoint Seema Patel to the San Mateo Planning Commission. Over the past five years, Seema has proven to be an exceptionally dedicated public servant, guiding our city through some of its most complex and consequential land-use policies with a steady, objective hand.

What sets Seema apart is her analytical rigor and deep subject matter expertise. Whether she is reviewing the Cycle 6 Housing Element, updating the ADU Ordinance, or meticulously cross-checking parcel data to expand the Housing Opportunity Overlay District, she brings a data-driven, problem-solving mindset to the dais. She consistently dives into the granular details to ensure every policy practically serves San Mateo's future.

Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By carefully listening to public input and relying on objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups.

Thank you,

Ann Dorsey

58 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Bruce Dughi
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 5:31 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Please Reappoint Seema Patel to the Planning Commission Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

Please reappoint Seema Patel to the Planning Commission. Over the past five years, Seema has proven to be an exceptionally dedicated public servant, guiding our city through some of its most complex and consequential land-use policies with a steady, objective hand.

What sets Seema apart is her analytical rigor and deep subject matter expertise. Whether she is reviewing the Cycle 6 Housing Element, updating the ADU Ordinance, or meticulously cross-checking parcel data to expand the Housing Opportunity Overlay District, she brings a data-driven, problem-solving mindset to the dais. She consistently dives into the granular details to ensure every policy practically serves San Mateo's future.

Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By carefully listening to public input and relying on objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups.

Bruce

59 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Ronnie Eaton >
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 11:26 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning commissioner appointment
Honorable members of the City Council:

I am writing to you today to express my concern over the potential reappointment of Seema Patel to the Planning Commission.

Ms. Patel has occupied a seat as a Planning Commissioner for some years now and she is strongly pro- development, having pushed for maximum height and densities when the community has looked for more balanced development.

I am concerned that she cannot represent our community without bias toward the desires of developers over that of San Mateans.

We need need voices on the commission that can truly represent our needs and work with neighborhood concerns as this city grows.

Thank you,

Ronnie K. Eaton
San Mateo resident

60 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Frank Elliott
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 8:20 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for Seema Patel’s reappointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission.

Over the past several years, I have had the opportunity to observe and interact with Seema through many complex land use and planning discussions. Whether or not one agrees with all of her positions, it is difficult to overstate the depth of knowledge, preparation, and analytical skill she brings to the Commission.

Seema has an exceptional understanding of how state housing laws, local zoning regulations, the Housing Element, historic preservation policies, and related planning frameworks interact. Her expertise extends well beyond any single issue area, and she cons istently demonstrates an extraordinary attention
to detail and willingness to study matters thoroughly before making decisions.

What has impressed me most is that Seema does not simply rely on summaries or staff recommendations. She takes the time to independently review materials, understand the legal and policy implications, and ask thoughtful questions about how decisions will function in practice. That level of diligence is rare and valuable in public service.

Even individuals (such as council members) who may disagree with some of her policy views often recognize her as an important resource because of her command of housing and planning laws. In my opinion, the City would be losing a highly knowledgeable and dedicated public servant if she is not reappointed.

Serving on the Planning Commission requires an enormous commitment of time and effort. Seema has consistently demonstrated professionalism, intelligence, seriousness, and dedication to that responsibility. The City will be hard-pressed to find someone with her combination of expertise, work ethic, and commitment to understanding the details of increasingly complicated planning issues.

For these reasons, I strongly urge the Council to reappoint Seema Patel to the Planning Commission.

Sincerely,
Frank Elliott

61 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Rustard Mustard
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2026 9:59 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Cc: City Mgr; Zachary Dahl; Clerk
Subject: Exceptionally Strong for Ms. Seema Patel
Dear Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council,

I am truly honored to have the privilege to share my support for Seema Patel. One fact about the Planning Commission is that there is a lot of technical homework. Not everyone has the background to really understand the different facets that go into planning. It is extremeley important that the Commissioners fully grasp the material.

This requires true dedication. The time commitment for Planning Commissioners is HUGE. Not only does it take hours to read the numerous reports and documents that are sent prior to the meetings, a number of the meetings in the past have run late Ms. Patel is talented in being able to quickly filter and discern technical information. She is also able to explain it to others in layman terms. It is crucial to have commissioners who have these strengths and are able to educate not only their colleagues but also the public at large

Over the past five years, Seema has proven to be an exceptionally dedicated public servant, guiding our city through some of its most complex and consequential land-use policies with a steady, objective hand. What sets Seema apart is her analytical rigor and deep subject matter expertise. Whether she is reviewing the Cycle 6 Housing Element, updating the ADU Ordinance, or meticulously cross-checking parcel data to expand the Housing Opportunity Overlay District, she brings a data-driven, problem-solving min dset
to the dais. She consistently dives into the granular details to ensure every policy practically serves San Mateo's future. Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By carefully listening to public input and relying on objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups. Seema’s proven leadership as Chair and her unwavering commitment to our city's balanced growth make her an invaluable asset to the Commission. I strongly urge you to reappoint her for a second term.

Sincerely,

Dr. Suzanne Flecker
Former Neighborhood Watch Board Member/District 1

62 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Lander Foquet
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 3:19 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel’s Reappointment to the Planning Commission Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,
I am writing to express my strong support for Seema Patel’s reappointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission.

As a San Mateo resident, I care deeply about making our city safer, more livable, and more affordable.

Seema has shown clear leadership on these issues, including safer streets, housing, and thoughtful land-use planning. Her work reflects the kind of practical, forward-looking approach San Mateo needs.

I especially appreciate that Seema understands the connection between good planning, safer transportation options, and quality of life for families, kids, cyclists, pedestrians, and residents who want to stay in San Mateo despite the high cost of living.

She brings the right mix of experience, preparation, and commitment to the Planning Commission. I strongly urge you to reappoint Seema Patel for a second term.

Sincerely,
Lander Foquet
San Mateo resident

63 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Mike Germano
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 6:15 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Seema Patel
SM City Council,

I'm writing to you as a concerned citizen and long time resident of San Mateo.

I Do Not support the possible reappointment of Planning Commissioner Seem Patel. Her actions and record have not reflected the best long term interests of our city or it's residents.

We all want what's best for our city and residents. Having the right people on our planning commission is crucial for our future well being.

Seema Patel's past record doesn't represent the best interest of our San Mateo future and she should not be reappointed.

Thank you,

Mike Germano

San Mateo

64 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Gary Germano
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 6:39 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Cc: Martin McTaggart
Subject: No Further Term For Seema Patel
Dear City Council members,

I understand that you are in the process of interviewing to select planning commissioners.

I am most importantly very concerned about the long term sustainability of our City, as well as the short term current deficit spending issues we have.

Our infrastructure is already undersized, and we need people who can put those three top priority issues as the "deal breaker" for every project or proposal that "comes across the table".

That being said, I formally request that you do not vote for Seema Patel for planning commissioner.

Thank you for your attention to these important issues,

Gary Germano
Born in San Mateo Resident

65 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: ROB GIBSON
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 11:46 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commision
I do not support the reappointment of Planning Commissioner Seema Patel.

By her past decisions it is obvious that she does not represent the majority of San Mateans but the interest of developers and real estate agents.

Please do not reappoint her.

Thank You,
Rob Gibson

66 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From:

Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 3:04 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Vacancy appointment--NOT Patel again!
Dear City Council….I just learned there are consideraƟons to appoint Sema Patel to a posiƟon. San Mateo faced disrupƟon and uproar, complaints, bad publicity and unacceptable behavior when she was on the council. Please DO NOT APPOINT HER—THERE ARE OTHERS WHO CAN DO THE JOB.

We have been blessed and appreciaƟve of your mature Council conduct since her departure. Your well- organized, professional proceedings and respecƞul cooperaƟon have been sincerely appreciated.

Respecƞully SubmiƩed…Tom and Carol GilleƩ

67 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From:

Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 12:19 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: RE: Re-appointment of Seema
Importance: High
Dear Council Members,
Please DO NOT re-appoint Seema!
There is been enough devastation to our beautiful city! We need members to PROTECT our city not DESTROY it.

Thank you,
Valerie Harnish
Resident for almost 40 years!

68 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Laurie Hietter
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 4:55 PM
To: Lisa Diaz Nash; Rob Newsom; Danielle Cwirko-Godycki; Adam Loraine; Nicole Fernandez Cc: Martin McTaggart
Subject: Planning Commission Appointment
Dear Mayor Loraine and Council Members,
I urge you not to reappoint Seema Patel to the Planning Commission, and to appoint Thomas Braham in her place.

Commissioner Patel's record and history demonstrates a lack of objectivity. She has served as a Regional Advisory Board Member of YIMBY Action and received the Housing Leadership Council's Housing Leader Award while sitting on the commission that reviews the very projects those organizations advocate for. These are not casual associations — they are formal affiliations with groups that have a direct interest in Planning Commission outcomes.

With Caiti Busch and Maxwell Schaumkel both appointed earlier this year with strongly pro-development perspectives (they stated they are YIMBYs in their interviews), a second term for Commissioner Patel would tip the commission's ideological balance well beyond what the community as a whole reflects.

I also speak from personal experience. During a public hearing, residents who expressed support for historic preservation — myself included — were subjected to personal attacks from the dais by Commissioner Patel. No resident should face that from a sitting commissioner, regardless of their views.I also witnessed her hyperbolic misrepresentations of historic preservation at General Plan Steering Committee meetings.

Thomas Braham is the commissioner this moment calls for. He is local, a licensed architect and AIA Fellow with thirty years of experience across the full project arc from entitlement through construction.

He has been a licensed architect in California since 2018. He participated directly in the Glazenwood historic district effort as a neighbor and understands that preservation and responsible growth are not opposites. The commission reviews design, compatibility, and historic resources every month. It needs someone who has spent a career making exactly those judgments.

The other applicants in the pool are well-intentioned, but none brings Braham's combination of relevant professional expertise, community engagement, and demonstrated commitment to both preservation and responsible growth. San Mateo's Planning Commission handles consequential decisions about the built environment every month. It deserves at least one member who has spent a career thinking about buildings the way architects do — from the inside out, with attention to what makes a neighborhood legible, livable, and worth preserving.

Seema Patel presided over one of the worst periods in San Mateo's history resulting in ugly buildings and many empty lots downtown.Please vote for balance. I urge you to appoint Thomas Braham on Wednesday night..

69 of 153

2 Respectfully,
Laurie Hietter
San Mateo, CA

--
Laurie

70 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From:

Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 10:06 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: CONCERNS ABOUT REAPPOINTMENT OF A PLANNING COMMISSIONER Dear City Council,

I am asking that you do not reappoint Seema Patel as a Planning Commissioner. Her highly charged inflammatory emotional behaviors, lack of professionalism, objectively, ethical responsibility, good judgment has been driven by extreme and toxic personal views that do not serve the majority of residents and will continue to cause long term damage to the quality of life, health and well being of San Mateo residents. She puts personal ideology above common sense, puts her personal crusades above the wants and needs of the people in San Mateo.

Her antics include “envelope gate”; using accusations about racism or elitism to get her way when none really existed; supporting gas appliance bans without data or public outreach and potential impacts on residences; supporting extreme housing related choices above the state maximum for no good reason, when most cities followed them as reasonable; calling residents racists because they just wanted to maintain a historic neighborhood regardless of who moved in; the Humboldt Bike Lane Fiasco which she supported costing the city millions to construct and calling valid concerns as simply “anti-bike”.

Her professional associations have been questionable with disgraced Mayor Amourence Lee. Her strong involvement with the Housing Leadership Council, Wiener, Corzo, Bonilla who are strong developer/union supporters significantly taints her objectivity and judgment

San Mateo deserves leadership that is grounded in honesty, substance/data, objectivity and accountability with no hidden alliances, agendas and threats regardless of ideology.

Thanks for taking the time to listen.

Gary Isoardi

71 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Susan Kenney
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 5:29 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Don't Reappoint Seema Patel
Seema Patel shouldn't be reappointed to the Planning Commission. Please consider my concerns.

While Seema Patel may have had good intentions regarding the Humboldt bike lane project, her leadership on the issue has left many San Mateo residents feeling unheard, frustrated, and concerned about the direction of the City. In pursuing a plan that removed too many needed parking spaces from a neighborhood with many elderly, underserved, and minority residents, she appeared to overlook the very real worries people expressed about accessibility, safety, and daily quality of life.

What has been especially troubling for many of us in San Mateo is the sense that these concerns were too quickly dismissed as simply being “anti-bike,” rather than acknowledged as genuine fears from residents trying to navigate their everyday lives. This created growing confusion and tension within the community. Many now view the project as a costly and painful mistake that could require millions of dollars to correct.

At a time when residents were asking for balance, listening, and practical solutions, the response instead felt rigid and disconnected. Regardless of intent, the outcome has damaged trust between the Planning Commission and the public, leaving many questioning whether community voices were truly valued in the decision-making process.

That's why I'm asking the City Council not to reappoint Ms. Patel to the Planning Commission.

I'm deeply
worried about a commissioner who won't listen to reason.

Thank you for considering this request.

Sue Kenney
San Mateo Resident

72 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Anne Kenney
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 5:11 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Seema Patel Reappointment
Dear Council Members,

I believe reappointing Ms. Patel to the Planning Commission would be a disservice to the City. For the role to be effective, commissioners need to come fully prepared for each issue—understanding the complexities and nuances before decisions are made. Given how critical these projects are to our City's future, we need team members who can do that homework consistently. I haven’t seen that in Ms.

Patel’s behavior.

I am also deeply concerned that planning commission members focus their decisions on objective guidelines and regulations rather than race or ethnicity. Our goal is to be a fair city where every applicant—regardless of their background—receives equal consideration based on the same standards we apply to everyone.

For those reasons, please do not reappoint Ms. Patel.

Best regards,
Anne

Anne Kenney

73 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Linda Khoury-Umili
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 6:09 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

I am wriƟng to express my strong support for Seema Patel's reappointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission. Over the past ﬁve years, Seema has proven to be an excepƟonally dedicated public servant, guiding our city through some of its most complex and consequenƟal land-use policies with a steady, objecƟve hand.

What sets Seema apart is her analyƟcal rigor and deep subject maƩer experƟse. Whether she is reviewing the Cycle 6 Housing Element, updaƟng the ADU Ordinance, or meƟculously cross-checking parcel data to expand the Housing Opportunity Overlay District, she brings a data-driven, problem-solving mindset to the dais. She consistently dives into the granular details to ensure every policy pracƟcally serves San Mateo's future.

Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversaƟons with respect and a collaboraƟve spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By carefully listening to public input and relying on objecƟve standards, she consistently makes decisions that beneﬁt the enƟre community rather than narrow interest groups.

Sincerely,

Linda Khoury

Lauriedale

Sent from my iPhone

74 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: John Kirn
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 2:38 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Supporting Seema Patel for Planning Commission Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

I am writing to express my strong support for Seema Patel's reappointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission. She has my full trust and I appreciate her leadership and vision for San Mateo.

Sincerely,

John Kirn
North Central San Mateo

75 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Adam Klafter
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 3:26 PM
To: Clerk
Subject: Public Comment for City Council Special Meeting on May 27th Members of the Appointment Subcommittee,
I wanted to write a letter in support of Seema Patel’s reappointment to the Planning Commission for a second term.

In my time so far as a planning commissioner, I have come to feel that our most important function is not necessarily the specific act of voting on one project or another. Instead, it is our responsibility to provide City Council with subject-matter expertise, informed commentary, and a variety of perspectives in advance of Council’s own work to enact policy. That variety of perspectives fundamentally improves the quality of our recommendations to Council.

In the two years that I have served on the commission with Seema, I have come to greatly appreciate both her passion for the role and her attention to detail on every matter which has come before us. I cannot think of a single meeting where Seema has not come prepared with insights that have improved the quality of our deliberations.

I took a moment to look over the applications, and I also find myself strongly in agreement with Commissioner Patel’s comment on the importance of institutional memory. Seema’s knowledge of the General Plan and our Housing Element, having worked on both, would be of great value to retain on the dais as the full implementation continues over the next several years.

Thank you for your consideration as you proceed with your deliberations on Wednesday.

Respectfully,
-Adam Klafter

76 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: RICH KRANZ
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 11:31 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Appointment of Sema Patel
Dear Members of the San Mateo City Council,
I am writing to express my opposition to the appointment of Sema Patel to any position involving planning or development policy within the City of San Mateo.

At a time when San Mateo faces significant fiscal pressures, infrastructure strain, traffic congestion, public safety demands, and growing uncertainty surrounding future city budgets, the City should be exercising caution, balance, and restraint in its planning philosophy. This is not the moment for ideologically driven growth advocacy that risks placing additional burdens on already stressed public systems.

Ms. Patel has publicly aligned herself with aggressive YIMBY-oriented planning approaches that, in my view, place excessive emphasis on rapid density expansion without sufficient consideration for long- term infrastructure capacity, neighborhood stability, parking impacts, traffic circulation, water resources, fiscal sustainability, and overall quality of life for existing residents. A quick search of San Mateo Journal articles back up this claim as to her ideologies and bias.

San Mateo needs planning commissioners and advisors who recognize that growth must be carefully phased, financially supportable, and tied to measurable infrastructure readiness—not simply pursued as a policy objective unto itself. Residents deserve thoughtful stewardship that balances housing goals with the practical realities of maintaining a functional and livable city.

Many residents are increasingly concerned that City leadership is prioritizing speculative growth models and state-driven density targets over preservation of neighborhood character and long-term municipal stability. Appointing outspoken advocates of uncompromising high-density policies would further erode public confidence in the objectivity and balance of the planning process.

The decisions made over the next several years will have lasting consequences for San Mateo. We cannot afford planning policies that may create irreversible impacts while the City is simultaneously confronting difficult budget realities and deferred infrastructure needs.

I respectfully urge the Council to appoint individuals who demonstrate moderation, fiscal prudence, and a balanced understanding of community planning rather than those associated with highly ideological development positions.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

77 of 153

2 Rich Kranz
San Mateo Resident
Sent from my Etch-a-sketch

78 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Lina Kudinar
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 1:05 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel’s Reappointment to the Planning Commission Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,
I am writing to urge you to reappoint Seema Patel to the San Mateo Planning Commission. She is exactly the kind of dedicated public servant our city needs. She has guided us through some of our most complex land- use decisions with a steady, objective hand.

Seema brings an analytical lens and deep subject matter expertise to San Mateo. Her experience reviewing the Cycle 6 Housing Element, updating the ADU Ordinance, and meticulously cross-checking parcel data to expand the Housing Opportunity Overlay District proves she is the right person for the job. Seema's involvement is an investment in San Mateo's future.

Seema is also the right person that our city needs right now. Her ability to navigate community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit makes citizens feel heard. There are few listeners in this world as great as Seema.

Seema’s proven leadership as Chair and her unwavering commitment to our city make her an invaluable asset to the Commission and the City of San Mateo. I strongly urge you to please reappoint her for another term.

Sincerely,

Lina Kudinar

79 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Tom Lease
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 2:46 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commission Recommendation
Thomas Braham checks all of the boxes as the best choice for the Planning Commission.

Thomas served as Studio Director at Gensler, and Senior Associate at Perkins and Will; which are elite Global Architectural firms.

Owner of his own highly regarded and successful architectural firm,

Thomas is USGBC LEED Accreditated which is an expertise in Green Building design which is increasingly important to have in our era of devastating climate change.

He is also a fellow "Thomas" and maybe most importantly studied Improv at "The Second City" in Chicago! God knows we need a sense of humor these days!

There are already YIMBY Planning Commissioners and with State housing laws housing advocates are no longer necessary for Planning Commission services.

lWhat is needed are architects, engineers, and planners to make sure San Mateo gets the best design, amenities, and infrastructure out of the deluge of projects coming to San Mateo.

Thank you for your attention to this matter!

80 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Alexis Lewis
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2026 7:08 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,
I am writing to express my support for reappointing Seema Patel to the Planning Commission.

Strong Planning Commissioners play an important role in helping shape the future of our community, and Seema has demonstrated dedication, thoughtful leadership, and a commitment to serving residents. Her experience and perspective have helped contribute to meaningful discussions around planning issues that impact housing, growth, and the overall well-being of our community.

Continuity and experienced leadership are important as our city continues to address complex issues and make decisions that will affect residents for years to come.

Reappointing Seema would help ensure that valuable experience and community engagement remain part of that process.

I respectfully urge you to support Seema Patel’s reappointment to the Planning Commission and thank you for your continued service to our community.

Sincerely,
Alexis Lewis
San Mateo / District 3

81 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: David Long
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 6:31 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Former Planning Commissioner’s Concerns RE: Reappointing Seema Patel Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers,
I previously served as a Planning Commissioner in Belmont, so I understand both the responsibilities of the role and the importance of public trust in land use decisions.

Planning Commissioners wield significant influence over residents, neighborhoods, and small property owners. Those decisions require fairness, restraint, humility, and a willingness to engage respectfully with people who may be unfamiliar with planning processes or intimidated by public hearings.

In my view, Commissioner Seema Patel has repeatedly demonstrated an ideological rigidity and rhetorical style that are poorly suited for this role. Too often, discussions appear driven by her predetermined worldview rather than balanced application of the City’s ordinances, policies, and practical realities.

Residents appearing before the Commission are often ordinary homeowners or small business owners with substantial personal and financial stakes in the outcome. They deserve commissioners who listen carefully, explain policies patiently, and approach disagreements with respect - not condescension or activism.

San Mateo needs Planning Commissioners focused on fair process, sound judgment, and community trust. I do not believe Commissioner Patel is the right person to continue serving in this capacity, and I respectfully urge the Council not to reappoint her.

Thank you for your service and consideration.

David Long

San Mateo, CA

82 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Kevin Luikens
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 3:56 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

Sincerely,

Kevin Luikens
Beresford Park

83 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Allison MacQueen Felder
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 7:17 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Cc: Allison MacQueen Felder
Subject: Seema Patel - an Asset to the City of San Mateo Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,
I’m writing in strong support of Seema Patel’s reappointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission.

Seema brings something increasingly rare to public service: careful preparation, thoughtful independence, and the courage to say what she believes. She approaches issues with nuance and depth, taking the time to fully understand the details rather than relying on talking points or political convenience. Whether the topic is housing policy, zoning, transportation, or broader long-term planning, it’s clear that she studies the material thoroughly and thinks critically about the real-world impacts of decisions.

What I especially appreciate is that Seema is future-
oriented while still grounded in practicality. She asks hard questions, evaluates data carefully, and makes thoughtful recommendations that reflect both community needs and the realities San Mateo faces as a growing city. Even when discussions become contentious, she remains direct, respectful, and principled.

Seema is also willing to speak candidly and independently. She says what she means and means what she says, and that kind of integrity matters deeply on a commission making decisions that will shape San Mateo for decades to come.

Our city benefits from commissioners who are serious, informed, and unafraid to engage thoughtfully with difficult issues. Seema has consistently demonstrated those qualities, and I believe she is a tremendous asset to San Mateo.

I strongly encourage you to reappoint her to the Planning Commission.

Sincerely,
Allison MacQueen
North Shoreview Resident

84 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Colin Madere
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 3:34 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commission seat
Hello Council,

Please don’t bend for the whiners. You know who the best person for the job is, it’s obvious. Do the right thing for the city, even if it means you have to listen to more whining. Unfortunately, that’s part of the job. (I really wish you didn’t have to repeatedly hear from the same disingenuous people saying untrue things ALL THE TIME. I can’t imagine how exhausƟng that is and I’m impressed by how you all manage it. Stay STRONG, don’t let them wear you down!)

Thank you,

Colin Madere

85 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Selena Martinez
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2026 6:21 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

Sincerely,

Selena Martinez Mak
Fiesta Gardens Neighborhood District 3- San Mateo

86 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Max Mautner
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2026 11:38 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Mayor Loraine and Members of the City Council,

I'm writing to urge your support for Seema Patel's re-appointment to the Planning Commission.

Seema has served the commission with distinction — including as chair — and brings a level of analytical
rigor and policy depth that is rare on any volunteer body. She engages substantively with staff reports, asks the hard questions about housing capacity and project feasibility, and keeps public meetings running efficiently and fairly.

San Mateo faces real housing and land use challenges. The commission benefits enormously from members who understand the tradeoffs involved and can provide meaningful, constructive feedback to staff rather than reflexive opposition. Seema is that commissioner.

I hope you'll consider her record on the merits.

Thank you,
Max Mautner

87 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Maria Mavridis
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 7:06 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Seema Patel-Wrong for San Mateo
Dear City Council Members,

I am writing to express my concerns regarding Seema Patel’s candidacy for City Council and her continued role in shaping San Mateo policy decisions.

Over the past several years, many residents have voiced concerns about Ms. Patel’s approach to development, housing density, neighborhood planning, and transportation policies. Repeatedly, community feedback appears to have been minimized or dismissed in favor of ideological positions that many residents feel do not reflect the needs of San Mateo neighborhoods.

I am particularly concerned about:

Support for aggressive upzoning and increased density with limited regard for neighborhood impact Dismissal of resident concerns regarding parking, traffic, and public input Alignment with political interests and activist agendas that many feel undermine local control A pattern of divisive rhetoric rather than collaborative leadership

San Mateo deserves leaders who listen respectfully to residents, seek balanced solutions, and prioritize transparency, accountability, and practical governance over political activism.

I hope the Council and voters carefully consider the importance of thoughtful, community-focused leadership as this election approaches.

Sincerely,

Maria Mavridis,
San Mateo Resident
Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer

88 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Ted McKinnon
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 1:44 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Councilmembers,

I can’t say enough good things about Seema Patel. I credit Seema for inspiring me to educate myself on housing legislation and the General Plan. Of course this wasn’t private tutoring. She teaches by example. By communicating simply and clearly. By not putting on airs, but patiently disseminating complex topics to broaden engagement. If it weren’t for Seema I wouldn’t know what “by right” or “ministerial vs. discretionary” meant, or what SB330 was, or the Builder’s Remedy. And it’s all because she brought these things up in their relevant context to San Mateo, and explained everything clearly and concisely. I owe her a debt of gratitude for that. Seema has that rare combination of knowledge and insight guided by a strong moral compass. She deserves another term on the Planning Commission.

Sincerely,

Ted McKinnon
Beresford/Hillsdale
District 5

89 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Mark Miller
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 10:18 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Strong Support for Seema Patel’s Reappointment to the Planning Commission Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

Sincerely,

mark miller
indian springs

--
Sent from my mobile internet communicator

90 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Genel Morgan
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 2:33 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Possible renewing appointment of Seema Patel as Planning Commissioner Dear Council Members,
I strongly oppose the reappointment of Seema Patel as Planning Commissioner. There has been too much controversy surrounding her and her actions over the last few years to justify it.

A Planning Commissioner needs to show impartiality in the job in order to make fair decisions. There are so many examples where Ms. Patel has demonstrated she does not have that ability. We need someone in that job who will represent the residents of San Mateo, not be aligned with other political figures who have shown to not have the best interest of the City at heart.

San Mateo is at a crucial point of transition. Decisions about bike-lanes, height limits and density of buildings and traffic and infrastructure issues impact the lives of everyone in the city. This should not be a political decision. It should be a decision about what is best for San Mateo as a whole, not just special interests.

Please thoughtfully consider your decision.

Thank you
Genel Morgan
San Mateo

91 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Hunter Muxfeldt
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 1:58 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Concerns regarding Seema Patel’s candidacy

Hu
nter Muxfeldt

92 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Jocelyn Nassar
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 2:57 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel’s Reappointment to the Planning Commission Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

What sets Seema apart is her analytical rigor and deep
subject matter expertise. Whether she is reviewing the Cycle 6 Housing Element, updating the ADU Ordinance, or
meticulously cross-checking parcel data to expand the
Housing Opportunity Overlay District, she brings a data- driven, problem-solving mindset to the dais. She consistently dives into the granular details to ensure every policy
practically serves San Mateo's future.

Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our
city needs right now. She navigates highly charged
community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By carefully listening to public input and relying on objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups.

Seema’s proven leadership as Chair and her unwavering
commitment to our city's balanced growth make her an
invaluable asset to the Commission. I strongly urge you to reappoint her for a second term.

Sincerely,

Jocelyn Nassar

93 of 153

2 San Mateo (Beresford Park)

94 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Jon New
Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2026 11:25 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

Sincerely,
Jonathan New
Homeowner, North Central.

95 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Adam Nugent
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 11:53 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Mayor Loraine and Members of the City Council,

I am wriƟng to express my strong support for Seema Patel's reappointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission.

Having had the privilege of serving alongside Seema on the City’s Planning Commission, I can personally aƩest to the profound insight, professionalism, and collaboraƟve spirit she brings to the dais.

During our Ɵme working together, I consistently admired her analyƟcal rigor and deep subject maƩer experƟse. Seema does not merely skim complex policies; she dives directly into the granular details. Whether we were navigaƟng the intricacies of the 6th Cycle Housing Element, reviewing and recommending elements to our city’s General Plan Update, or carefully craŌing our ObjecƟve Design Standards, she approached every challenge with a steady, data-driven mindset.

She ensures that the land-use policies the city advances are not just theoreƟcally sound, but highly pracƟcal for San Mateo's future.

Moreover, Seema possesses the exact temperament necessary for local governance today. I have seen ﬁrsthand how she navigates highly charged community conversaƟons. She listens earnestly to public input and treats everyone with respect, all while carefully balancing state mandates against the vision outlined in our General Plan - a General Plan she had a major role in shaping and which found overwhelming support from the people of San Mateo at the ballot. By anchoring her decisions in objecƟve standards rather than the pressures of narrow interest groups, she consistently advocates for the community as a whole.

Her unwavering commitment to balanced growth, coupled with her proven leadership as Chair, makes her an indispensable asset to the Commission and our city. Over the past ﬁve years, she has proven to be an excepƟonally dedicated public servant, and I strongly urge you to reappoint her for a second term.

Sincerely,
Adam Nugent

Vice-Chair, San Mateo County Planning Commission (The views expressed herein are my own.)

96 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Sabrina Ocampo
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 2:00 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Endorsement of Seema Patel’s Reappointment
Dear Mayor Loraine and Esteemed Members of City Council, As someone currently serving as Vice Chair of the Parks & Recreation Commission, I understand how important it is to have leaders who can balance policy expertise with empathy and thoughtful community engagement. That’s exactly why I’m proud to support Seema Patel’s reappointment to the Planning Commission.

Over the past five years, Seema has consistently demonstrated what thoughtful, balanced public service looks like. She has helped guide San Mateo through some of the city’s most important and complex land- use conversations with a calm, analytical, and solutions-oriented approach.

She also brings a collaborative and respectful presence to the dais, especially during conversations that can sometimes become emotionally charged. Seema listens carefully to community feedback while remaining grounded in facts, sound policy, and the long-term needs of our city.

Just as importantly, Seema leads with empathy. She understands that behind every planning discussion are real residents, families, and neighborhoods, and she consistently approaches those conversations with professionalism, care, and respect.

Seema’s leadership has been incredibly valuable to San Mateo, and I strongly encourage her reappointment for a second term on the Planning Commission.

Warmly,
Sabrina Ocampo

Vice Chair, Parks & Recreation Commission | Community Lead, Team Up to Clean Up | Native San Matean

97 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Leyla Ozgur
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 9:49 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Strong Support for Seema Patel’s Reappointment to the Planning Commission Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By care fully listening to public input and relying on
objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups.

Sincerely,

Leyla Ozgur Alhassen
Redwood Shores, CA

98 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Alison Proctor
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 5:29 PM
To: Clerk
Subject: Strong Support for Seema Patel’s Reappointment to the Planning Commission Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

What sets Seema apart is her analytical rigor and deep subject matter expertise. Whether she is reviewing the Cycle 6 Housing Element, updating the ADU Ordinance, or meticulously cross-checking parcel data to expand the Housing Opportunity Overlay District, she brings a data-driven, problem-solving mindset to the dais. She consistently dives into the granular details to ensure every policy practically serves San Mateo's future.

Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By carefully listening to public input and relying on objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups.

Sincerely,
Alison Proctor

99 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Don Robertson
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 1:51 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Seema Patel
Please do not re-appoint Seema Patel to the Planning Commission. Her past actions and support for failed policies do not aline with the majority of San Mateo residents.

Regards,
Don Robertson

San Mateo

100 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Rick
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 11:31 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Cc: Alex Khojikian
Subject: Do NOT appoint Seema Patel to Planning Commission Do NOT appoint Seema Patel to Planning Commission

I know you have been getting hundreds of emails and calls on both sides of this issue. This by itself tells us that this is a controversial appointment and EXTREMELY DIVISIVE. We do not need more polarization of our city and its residents. We need fair, even-minded commissioners that will study all sides of an issue and do what is best for the City of San Mateo and not solely represent special interest groups and developers. Her misdeeds and transgressions have been widely documented, this is not what the City needs. Seema Patel is not someone who reaches out to heal and build consensus.

Rick Sakuda
San Mateo, CA

101 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Dave Santos
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 8:48 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commissioner Appointment
It is time for San Mateo to turn the page on divisive politics and the overreach of special interests with a hidden agenda.

To encourage more citizens to participate in city government, it is time to select a new Planning Commissioner rather than reappoint Seema Patel.

Plain and simple, this is overreaching and a power grab.

It is me to appoint a new commissioner who is not aligned with any one faction and that can go about their job with the best interests of the city in mind rather than pursue their own agenda.

Seema's has had her opportunity; to reappoint her is not a solution for the city to pursue as part of its future.

Please consider appointing a new Planning Commissioner who will act impartially.

Also, since Councilman Lorraine has endorsed Seema for a city council position; he should abstain from voting on this issue.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Sincerely.

Dave Santos

102 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From:

Sent: Monday, May 25, 2026 6:28 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

I am writing to express my strong support for Seema Patel's reappointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission. Over the past five years, Seema has proven to be an exceptionally dedicated public servant, guiding our city through some of its most complex and consequential land-use policies with a steady, objective hand. What sets Seema apart is her analytical rigor and deep subject matter expertise. Whether she is reviewing the Cycle 6 Housing Element, updating the ADU Ordinance, or meticulously cross-checking parcel data to expand the Housing Opportunity Overlay District, she brings a data-driven, problem-solving mindset to the dais. She consistently dives into the granular details to ensure every policy practically serves San Mateo's future.

Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By carefully listening to public input and relying on objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups.

Seema’s proven leadership as Chair and her unwavering commitment to our city's balanced growth make
her an invaluable asset to the Commission. I strongly urge you to reappoint her for a second term. Sincerely, Ruth Schueler, 94404

103 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Sarah Schwanbeck
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 8:34 PM
To: Danielle Cwirko-Godycki; City Council (San Mateo)
Cc: Sarah Schwanbeck
Subject: Re: Seema Patel
Danielle / city council,

I actually meant to send this with my personal email. This is my personal opinion and not that of my employer.

Sarah

On Tue, May 26, 2026, 17:51 Danielle Cwirko-Godycki <[email protected]> wrote:

Thank you for your feedback. I cannot opine on future decisions but wanted to take a moment to acknowledge your letter and that I’ve read it.

Danielle Cwirko-Godycki
Councilmember, District 4, San Mateo

From: Sarah Schwanbeck
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 12:52 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo) <[email protected]> Subject: Seema Patel

Please do not accept seema Patel on the sm city council, she doesn't represent resident concerns well and does a poor job for city of San Mateo residents.

Sarah
* PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message, together with any attachments, is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. It may contain information that is confidential and prohibited from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby

104 of 153

2 notified that any dissemination or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the original sender immediately by telephone or by return e-mail and delete this message along with any attachments from your computer. Thank you.

105 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Carrie Scribner
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2026 4:47 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

Sincerely,
Carrie Scribner

Sent from my iPhone

106 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Rsellers007
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 1:18 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Cc:

Subject: Seema Patel - NO
Dear City Council,

I am wriƟng you to reﬂect a No Conﬁdence opinion on appoinƟng Seems Patel to the Planning Commission. We in the community feel that they do not represent our interests and stand as an example of community voice suppression.

Thank you for your aƩenƟon and assistance in assuring that we the ciƟzens are adequately represented.

Best regards,

Robert Sellers
Beresford Hillsdale Community Advocate

Sent from my iPhone

107 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From:

Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 1:36 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Seema Patel
I understand Seema would like to be reappointed to Planning Commision as well as run for City Council.

There are 3 instances where Seema’s behavior have been troublesome for me.

She publicly called out a resident in my neighborhood insinuaƟng the resident was a slum lord based on false accusaƟons from a tenant. This resident presented her case in front of City Council and they voted in favor of the resident over the tenant. Seema spoke out against the landlord both at City Council meeƟngs and on Next Door. It was solely her opinion and not based in facts and oﬀered no apology to the resident.

She posted what appears to be a fake picture of her family riding bikes in the controversial Humboldt Street bike lane which she strongly supported. She insinuated she and her family used the bike lane frequently. I tried to ﬁnd the picture to include here but could not locate it.

A young boy 10 years old spoke at a City Council meeƟng telling of his experience aŌer over 200 parking spaces were removed to accommodate the Humboldt Street Bike Lane. He lives in an apartment and like most children who live in apartments, he played in the driveway kicking his soccer ball around. Because the parking had become so diﬃcult the residents of the building agreed amongst themselves to use the driveway for parking. This eliminated his play area.

Seema used Next Door to minimize this boys experience and suggested he could simply go to MLK Park to kick his ball around. He was only 10! Would you send your child to the park alone that is 5 blocks away?

These 3 instances demonstrated to me that she is out of touch with reality and pushes her opinions regardless of the facts and creates scenarios to support her falsehoods.

I can’t support her for either posiƟon based on these 3 examples.

Thanks for reading.

Claire Stephens

108 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Gerald Stokes
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 9:43 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

Sincerely,

[Gerald Stokes

Sent from my iPhone

109 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Judy Syrkin-Nikolau
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 4:38 PM
To: Clerk
Subject: Strong Support for Seema Patel’s Reappointment to the Planning Commission Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By care fully listening to public input and relying on
objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups.

Sincerely,

Judy Syrkin-Nikolau
Sunnybrae neighborhood

110 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Michael Tejada
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 12:48 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By care fully listening to public input and relying on
objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups.

Sincerely,

Michael Tejada

111 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Mari
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 12:38 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema PAtel's Reappointment to the Planning Commission Dear Mayor and City Council,
I wanted to share my support for Seema Patel’s reappointment to the Planning Commission.

Over the last several years, Seema has clearly put a huge amount of time and effort into the role. She’s thoughtful, detail-oriented, and genuinely seems to care about making good long-term decisions for San Mateo. I’ve especially appreciated how seriously she takes the work and how willing she is to dig into complicated issues instead of just taking things at face value.

What also stood out to me personally was watching her during the community discussions and meetings around the Humboldt bike lane. Those conversations were often emotional and polarized, but she consistently came across as calm, respectful, and focused on understanding the broader impact on the community. I think that kind of steady and thoughtful approach is really valuable in public service.

I think Seema has been a strong asset to the Commission, and I hope you will consider reappointing her for another term.

Thank you,
--

To help
p otect you
p vacy
Mic o so ft
Office
p even ed
au o ma c
download of
this pic e
f om th
In e ne

Mariana d' Abreu Tiwari

112 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Linda Tribuzi
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 1:14 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commissioner
Hello,
I am sending this email as my support to not reappoint Seema Patel as Planning Commissioner.

In general, I am extremely concerned by actions taken in the city of San Mateo with new buildings, building height limits, traffic, and parking. Please listen to city residents and take appropriate action to accommodate all citizens, not just special interest groups and a few citizens.

Thank you,
Linda Tribuzi

113 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Holeva Finau
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 3:33 PM
To: Dawen Tsien
Cc: Martin McTaggart; Chantal Eaton; Clerk
Subject: RE: Strong Support for Seema Patel’s Reappointment to the Planning Commission Hello Dawen,

Confirming receipt of your email which has been shared with the City Council bcc’d in this correspondence along with the City Clerk.

Thank you,
Holeva
Holeva S Finau
Administrative Assistant | Community Development Dept.
330 W. 20th Ave., San Mateo, CA 94403
650-522-7236 | [email protected]

From: Dawen Tsien
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 1:54 PM
To: Planning Commission <[email protected]> Subject: Strong Support for Seema Patel’s Reappointment to the Planning Commission

Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

What sets Seema apart is her analytical rigor and deep subject matter expertise. Whether she is reviewing the Cycle 6 Housing Element, updating the ADU Ordinance, or meticulously cross-checking parcel data to expand the Housing Opportunity Overlay District, she brings a data-driven, problem-solving mindset to the dais. She consistently dives into the granular details to ensure every policy practically serves San Mateo's future.

Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By carefully listening to public input and relying on objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups.

--
Sincerely,
DAWEN "David" TSIEN

114 of 153

2 115 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Lisa Vande Voorde
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 4:29 PM
To: Clerk
Subject: PUBLIC COMMENT 5/27/26 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING: Planning Commission Interviews
Dear San Mateo City Council,

I'm a lifelong Giants fan, so excuse me if I use a baseball analogy here. I've always believed that our city commissioners should be like umpires -- neutral. But Seema Patel has made a career of being a player. You simply cannot be a "Housing Leader" for a special interest group, and then claim to objectively judge their development applications.

How can Seema Patel have an open mind, when her mind is already made up by the advocacy groups she leads?

You have five other applicants for the Planning Commission from which to choose. Please, find someone who doesn't have a trophy from the group they are supposed to be regulating.

Sincerely,

Lisa Vande Voorde, San Mateo resident

To help p otect you p v acy M c osoft Off ce p evented automat c download of th s pictu e f om the Inte net

Lisa Vande Voorde
Certified Group Fitness Instructor, American Council on Exercise "Keeping you strong, for life!"

116 of 153

2 117 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Michael
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 9:24 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Cc: Clerk
Subject: Planning Commissioner Process - Reject Patel's Renewal Mayor and Councilmembers -

Rarely should the renewal of a commissioner be controversial, but rarely has there been a commissioner so out of line and derelict in her duties as Seema Patel. To renew her would not just be a mistake, it would be outright irresponsible of you to do so. Don't be fooled by her outward attempts at rehabbing her image. We have years of evidence proving who she is at her core and I promise you that has not changed one iota.

You will hear many arguments for and against Patel, but your decision can not focus on her positions, but rather her BEHAVIORS. There are several incontrovertible facts that make her unfit for office. She has on multiple occasions overreached in her authority. She has assumed an activist role that has excluded the diverse desires and viewpoints of San Mateans. Most importantly, she has routinely and frequently disrespected and shown outright disdain for those who have spoken up and do not share her specific, narrow viewpoints. These three key things should make your decision extremely easy, especially given very viable alternatives who will better serve the community.

Patel has displayed arrogance beyond the pale, and a temperament ill-suited to public office, calling residents racists, Karens, and other insults while in her role. She called an entire cohort of neighbors racist for daring to oppose a project, going on a 20-minute rant about her personal experiences that had literally nothing to do with the project at hand. Her attitude has generally been an "I know better than you so I'm going to move in this direction regardless" approach.

During the GP 2040 process—one touted as very comprehensive in seeking community input— she put forth a more extreme development option beyond even the most extreme height and density option presented by the committee. An outrageous and inappropriate power move well outside the boundaries of a planning commissioner. It wasn't about the community; it's always about her personal ideologies. If you're not with her, you're against her.

When San Mateo submitted its hard-fought housing element to the state, Patel along with disgraced commissioner Adam Nugent, put together a 75-page PowerPoint they sent directly to the HCD trying to derail approval of the element by claiming it did not go far enough. Again, the housing element was the product of literally years of community input and diligent efforts by staff and outside consultants, and Patel and Nugent assumed they knew better and tried to derail it. No doubt that submission is a huge part of the reason San Mateo had to go through several more revisions, taking a few years and costing millions more. She's not playing for team San Mateo, and she's a liability to our city.

She is (and indeed remains) a supporter of, and is supported by, many of the same highly problematic, if not outright corrupt, past electeds like Amourence Lee, who infamously concocted a fake council appointment tampering scheme, and the aforementioned Adam Nugent.

She has abused her power on NextDoor as a lead, and along with fellow activists have had numerous people who disagree with her suspended and even kicked off the platform. She continues to abuse this power today, refusing to step away as a lead despite the massive conflict of interest and pattern of abuse. This could arguably be her most egregious offense given the frequency of her abuse and its targeted use to silence dissenting voices on the social platform with the greatest neighborhood reach.

118 of 153

2 We have seen what happens when these kind of people are given power - San Mateo has paid a heavy price and has had to fight hard to remove them and restore rationality, dignity and respect to our city and its institutions. Renewing Patel as a Planning Commissioner would be a huge step backward. San Mateo needs to move forward and make much better decisions, by appointing and electing real representative - not activists - who will respect ALL San Mateans, not just their chosen little bubble of ideologues who try to throw the loudest tantrums at meetings and create more noise than substance, who eschew compromise, and reduce participation to the lowest common denominator.

Sincerely - Michael Weinhauer

119 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: John Weinrich
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 11:05 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: In support of Seema Patel's reappointment to the Planning Commission Dear Mayor Loraine and Members of the City Council,

I'm writing to express my strong support for Seema Patel's reappointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission. I've watched several Planning Commission meeting recordings on YouTube and have been impressed by Seema's leadership, especially given the influx of new development proposals in San Mateo. She runs the meetings well, provides insightful comments, asks important questions, and is a very effective commissioner, the kind of commissioner San Mateo benefits from having.

Thank you for your time,
John Weinrich
San Mateo District 1 Resident

120 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Steve Weiss
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2026 10:20 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Dissapointment with Seema Patel
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

I am writing to express my opposition to Seema Patel’s reappointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission. While public service requires difficult decisions and thoughtful analysis, I do not believe her continued tenure reflects the balanced and community- responsive leadership San Mateo needs at this time.

Over the past five years, many residents have felt that the Planning Commission has become increasingly disconnected from neighborhood concerns and overly focused on advancing dense development policies without sufficient consideration for their long- term
impacts on infrastructure, traffic, parking, public safety, and quality of life. As Chair and commissioner, Seema Patel has played a central role in shaping and advancing those policies.

Although she is often described as data-driven, many community members feel that public input has too often been minimized or treated as secondary to predetermined outcomes and state mandates. Effective leadership requires not only technical expertise, but
also genuine responsiveness to residents who will live with the consequences of these decisions for decades.

San Mateo benefits from commissioners who approach planning issues with greater balance, independence, and willingness to challenge one-size-fits-all development approaches. At a time when many residents are asking for more transparency, broader representation, and stronger consideration of neighborhood impacts, I believe new leadership on the Planning Commission would better serve the community.

For these reasons, I urge the City Council not to reappoint Seema Patel for another term.

Sincerely,

121 of 153

2 Steve Weiss

122 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Connie Weiss
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 1:21 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Seema Patel - Do Not Reappoint to the Planning Commission Attachments: IMG_0050.jpeg; IMG_4338.PNG; IMG_4333.JPG; IMG_4336.JPG; IMG_4334.JPG; IMG_ 1870.jpeg
Dear Honorable Members of the City Council,

For some reason, I thought we had until June to submit our letters about the importance of not reappointing Seema Patel to the Planning Commission. I have been personally attacked by Seema Patel for several years. Note that I am a private citizen, and I have never had a conversation with Patel, except for when I make comments in the San Mateo Daily Journal or on social media or in front of the Planning Commission. She knows nothing about me personally except for what I have shared in public forums. You will see some of those interactions in the attachment and link in this letter.

I cannot stress strongly enough that as leaders of our wonderful city, Council cannot appoint anyone who has a documented record of personally attacking private citizens who simply do not agree with the agenda Seema Patel is so dedicated to, and is dedicated to over and above any consideration of residents.

You received the Statement of Position from Ethics San Mateo in January 2024, outlining the activism of several Commissioners, including Seema Patel. Dialogue on her activities start at page 16, and
I encourage you to review it before tomorrow evening. The SOP can be accessed here: https://ethicssanmateo.com/wp-
content/uploads/2024/01/SOP-2024-1-Conflicts-of-Interest- Activism-and-Standards-for-Ethical-Conduct.pdf.

123 of 153

2 For my own story, my first encounter with Seema Patel was hearing her insinuate that
I and many of my neighbors were racist because we
were opposing a historic home from being destroyed in our neighborhood. Because of my own busy life, I had no idea the family who wanted to demolish the home were Black. But I was a racist according to Seema Patel.

The name calling and bad behavior didn’t stop there. Seema Patel invented a story that I am homophobic because I made a
comment saying she was “…doing a good job of grooming him to spew hate at good people…” (the full text can be seen in the SMDJ comment attached). Suddenly, according to Seema Patel, the word “grooming’ is only used by anti-LBGTQ+ folks, but googling the definition doesn’t confirm that - see the
attached screenshot. But this
is a signature Seema Patel move - twist the truth so tightly that it screams. She also got a buddy on Stonewall Democrats to diss me without even trying to contact me. I reached out to them via Facebook telling the true story, but truth wasn’t what they were after. They blocked me after calling me a “Karen.” And ironically, that is not the definition of a “Karen” either…

Seema Patel is an unabashed activist. She wears her activism proudly and any behavior justifies pushing her agenda forward. You will see in the SOP several pictures of Seema Patel at YIMBY Galas. I have also attached some pictures at the most recent YIMBY Gala, as it shows her continued radical activism.

These are the highlights of my personal experience with Seema Patel.

There are more, but I think you get the idea.

124 of 153

3 There is no one more deserving to be kicked out of a
Commission than Seema Patel. You have the documentation. Please do the right thing for San Mateo residents and put them ahead of special interests, activists, and corrupt behavior. Do Not Reappoint Seema Patel!

Thank you,

Connie Weiss
San Mateo Resident

Attached:

San Mateo Daily Journal Comment
Photos of April 2026 YIMBY Gala:
- Mark Dinan’s badge (and picture of Seema Patel with him) which matches badges in the other pics
- Seema Patel with Jordan Grimes holding a “NIMBY TEARS” cup - Seema Patel with Scott Wiener

125 of 153

126 of 153

127 of 153

128 of 153

129 of 153

130 of 153

131 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Robert Whitehair
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 9:35 AM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Recommendation to Reappoint Seema Patel
Dear Mayor Loraine and City Council Members

Respectfully, I recommend the reappointment of Seema Patel to a second term on the San Mateo Planning Commission. Seema is a quite qualified individual, with a practical background and technical knowledge in planning in both the public and private sectors. She has significant experience bringing complex projects to fruition.

With developers in San Mateo having so many projects in the planning stages, it is so important that someone like Seema be on the Commission, one who understands how to deliver RHNA requirements.

San Mateo has already seen so much construction of new housing for above moderate income and moderate income families, but it is the deeply affordable housing needs that need very special attention. Seema Patel will offer that balanced perspective.

Thank you

Robert (he, him)

Acknowledgement: I reside on the unceded lands of our indigenous ancestors the Ramaytush Ohlone, while benefiting from racial privilege. We begin making reparations by accepting only a kinship view of our place on the planet: All life is interconnected, interdependent, and interrelated.

To TEXT Me

132 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Margaret Williams
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 3:12 PM
To: Clerk; City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
To City Council members:

I’d like to express my support for reappointing Seema Patel for a second term to the Planning Commission.

She has done an excellent job on the Commission. She is very organized and detail oriented, and also very knowledgeable about the issues around the projects we see as Planning Commissioners.

I think appointing her to a second term makes sense for continuity and since there’s a learning curve, it makes sense for the Planning Commission.

Thank you,

Margaret Williams
Planning Commissioner, City of San Mateo
[email protected]

133 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Elizabeth Wright
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 12:50 PM
To: Lisa Diaz Nash; City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Strong Support for Seema Patel’s Reappointment to the Planning Commission Dear Mayor, Councilmember Diaz Nash, and other Members of the City Council,

Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By carefully listening to public input and relying on objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Wright

~
Elizabeth Wright

134 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Kai W
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2026 3:21 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

Sincerely,

Kailun Wu

135 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Donald Yu
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 4:59 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel’s Reappointment to the Planning Commission Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,
I am writing to urge you to reappoint Seema Patel to the San Mateo Planning Commission. Having watched her work over the past five years, I can tell you that she is exactly the kind of dedicated public servant our city needs. She has guided us through some of our most complex land-use decisions with a steady, objective hand.

Sincerely,

Donald Yu

136 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Stacey Kepler
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2026 9:37 AM
To: Clerk
Subject: Seema Patel Support Letter
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

What sets Seema apart is her analytical rigor and deep subject matter expertise. Whether she is reviewing the Cycle 6 Housing Element, updating the ADU Ordinance, or meticulously cross-checking parcel data to expand the Housing Opportunity Overlay District, she brings a data-driven, problem-solving mindset to the dais. She consistently dives into the granular details to ensure every policy practically serves San Mateo's future.

Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By carefully listening to public input and relying on objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups.

Sincerely,
Stacey Zeng
in the Central Neighborhood

137 of 153

138 of 153

139 of 153

May 26, 2026
Dear Mayor Loraine and Members of the City Council,
Please consider the appointment of Thomas Braham to the Planning Commission.

Mr. Braham’s extensive technical knowledge as a practicing architect for 30 years, his reﬁned design judgment, and effective communication skills make him an exceptional candidate for this commission.

In the past, we have had multiple architects serving on the Planning Commission concurrently. This would be a signiﬁcant advantage to have another experienced architect, enabling these new projects to blend more effectively with the existing neighborhoods and our Historic Downtown. Additionally, Mr. Braham is committed to preservation and responsible growth.

We require a fair and impartial individual to be appointed who does not have a conﬂict of interest with any special interest housing group they currently align themselves with.

Mr. Braham is an ideal candidate for appointment to the Planning Commission.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Laurie Watanuki
1 140 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Pete Bertrand
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 4:38 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Please do not reappoint Seema Patel to city council.

Hello,

I ask that you do not reappoint Seema Patel to the city council.

Her views and policies are not in the best interest of the citizens of the city.

Pete Bertrand - concerned citizen.

141 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Vikash Bhagwandin
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 4:06 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Planning Commissioner Reappointment
Dear City Council Members,

It is with great sadness that I write to you in opposition of the reappointment of Commissioner Patel.

Commissioner Patel has personally articulated that she was meeting with Windy Hill ventures on the Fish Market project while aggressively advocating for Measure T on Nextdoor, which crippled our community's ability to voice their concerns. Commissioners must present themselves as politically agnostic while executing their duties in public, and on social media, despite their personal opinions.

From a personal perspective, the special interest groups of which Commissioner Patel is a leader have inappropriately and disrespectfully characterized me as a 'tinfoil hat' for advocating protections against harmful radiation with the 5G cell towers. This does not rise to the high standards of San Mateo Commissioners and lacks maturity.

Although not illegal, the mere appearance of ethical misconduct should be sufficient to disqualify Commissioner Patel from reappointment. I am sure there are more qualified candidates without the baggage.

Warmest Regards,
Vikash J. Bhagwandin, Ph.D.

142 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Christine Cook
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 5:23 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Support for Seema Patel
Mayor and City Council Members:

I’m wriƟng to express my support for th reappointment of Seema Patel to the Planning Commission. We’ve beneﬁƩed from her dedicaƟon and experƟse during her prior term, and I feel we’d do well to conƟnue to seek out her skills for an upcoming term.

ChrisƟne Cook
North Central

143 of 153

144 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Gina Fleming
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 4:55 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Supporting Seema Patel for Reappointment to the Planning Commission Dear San Mateo City Councilmembers,

I’m writing in strong support of Seema Patel’s reappointment to the Planning Commission.

Seema brings a thoughtful, balanced, and deeply community-minded perspective to the role. She consistently approaches complex issues with professionalism, preparation, and a genuine desire to make San Mateo a better place for current and future residents. I’ve especially appreciated her willingness to engage thoughtfully on housing, growth, and long-term planning challenges facing our city.

San Mateo benefits from commissioners who are informed, collaborative, and focused on practical solutions, and Seema has demonstrated those qualities throughout her service.

At a time when our city is navigating important decisions about housing and development, continuity and experienced leadership on the Planning Commission matter.

I hope you will support Seema’s reappointment.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best,
Gina Fleming

145 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Uma Krishnan
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 4:29 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Urging you to reappoint Seema Patel to Planning Commission Dear Mayor, Deputy Mayor, and Members of the City Council, I am writing as President of the San Mateo County Asian American Pacific Islander (SMC AAPI) Alliance — and as a colleague, fellow advocate, and friend — to express my strong support for Seema Patel's reappointment to the San Mateo Planning Commission. As we close out AAPI Heritage Month, I can think of no better way to honor the spirit of this moment than by urging you to retain one of the most capable and committed public servants San Mateo has.

I have had the privilege of working alongside Seema for several years, both through our professional collaboration and through her longtime involvement with the SMC AAPI Alliance, where she serves as an active member and former board member. In that time, I have watched her navigate some of San Mateo's most complex and consequential land-use decisions with rigor, humility, and an unwavering commitment to equity. Every claim she brings is backed by data. Every initiative she leads is thoroughly researched. Her analytical depth on housing policy is genuinely unmatched in this region, and I say that having worked in data and policy spaces myself.

What sets Seema apart isn't just her expertise, it's how she uses it. She approaches planning with deep respect for her colleagues, a genuine desire to hear from the public, and a clear focus on what is best for San Mateo in the long run. She has also generously shared that knowledge with our community, including our high school fellows in the AAPI Alliance's Rising Stars Fellowship. She holds a seat at the table, but she brings us chairs.

I also want to speak plainly about what Seema's presence means to our community. As an Indian American woman myself, I am acutely aware of how difficult this moment is for South Asians in this country. Anti-Indian racism and violence are on the rise, and representation in civic leadership is protective, empowering, and necessary. She fights for our community not just in name, but in practice, every time she shows up to that commission.

Seema has served with distinction, including as Chair, and her reappointment is simply what is right for San Mateo. I urge you to act accordingly. The city, and frankly the county, would be the lesser for losing her.

Sincerely,
Uma Rao Krishnan
President, San Mateo County AAPI Alliance
SMC Central Committee Member Executive Board Member
California Democratic Party AAPI Caucus

146 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Justin Lee
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 5:02 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Strong Support for Seema Patel’s Reappointment to the Planning Commission Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

What sets Seema apart is her analytical rigor and deep subject matter expertise. Whether she is reviewing the Cycle 6 Housing Element, updating the ADU Ordinance, or meticulously cross-checking parcel data to expand the Housing Opportunity Overlay District, she brings a data-driven, problem-solving mindset to the dais. She consistently dives into the granular details to ensure every policy practically serves San Mateo's future.

Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By carefully listening to public input and relying on objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups.

Sincerely,

Justin Lee
Parkside Neighborhood

147 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Erin Livingston
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 4:36 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Strong Support for Seema Patel’s Reappointment to the Planning Commission Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council,

Furthermore, Seema possesses the exact temperament our city needs right now. She navigates highly charged community conversations with respect and a collaborative spirit, always balancing state mandates with the vision outlined in our General Plan. By carefully listening to public input and relying on objective standards, she consistently makes decisions that benefit the entire community rather than narrow interest groups.

Sincerely,
Erin Livingston and Michael Ischay

148 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Lisa Rayle
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 4:51 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Supporting Seema Patel’s reappointment
Dear council members,

I am writing in support of Seema Patel’s appointment to the Planning Commission.

In her tenure on the Commission, she has proven her dedication for the public good through exceptional rigor and deep understanding of complex land use policies.

Few others possess the rigor, subject matter expertise, and passion for safeguarding the interests of citizens as a whole.

We need people like her who work to represent the broad community interest. It would be easy to listen to just the interests of the loudest few. But Patel does the hard work to get the data and listen to the wider range of voices.

We need Patel’s leadership and I urge you to reappoint her.

Sincerely,
Lisa Rayle

149 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Maxwell Schaumkel
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 4:45 PM
To: Clerk
Subject: Letter of Recommendation for Seema Patel
Attachments: Letter of Recommendation - Seema Patel.docx Sensitivity: Confidential
Please see attached for the Letter of Recommendation that I would like to submit for Seema Patel to be reappointed to the Planning Commission.

Thank You,
Max Schaumkel

150 of 153

To Whom it may Concern,
I am writing in strong support of the reappointment of Seema Patel to the City of San Mateo Planning Commission.

During her tenure on the Planning Commission, including her service as Chair, Seema has consistently demonstrated professionalism, integrity, and a deep commitment to the City of San Mateo. She approaches every project and policy matter with thoughtful analysis, preparation, and genuine care for the community we serve.

As a fellow Planning Commissioner, I have had the opportunity to work closely with Seema and witness ﬁrsthand her exceptional leadership and knowledge of the complex issues facing our city. Whether discussing housing policy, commercial development, zoning updates, objective design standards, or broader planning ordinances, Seema is always well-versed in the subject matter and contributes meaningful insight to the discussion.

What has stood out to me most is her ability to balance a strong understanding of evolving state legislation while remaining a steadfast advocate for the residents and constituents of San Mateo. She understands the importance of thoughtful growth, community character, and responsible planning, and she consistently ensures that community voices remain part of the conversation.

On a personal note, when I joined the Planning Commission as a new commissioner, Seema immediately welcomed me and took the initiative to help me get up to speed. Her mentorship, professionalism, and willingness to support her colleagues reﬂect the type of leadership that strengthens the entire Commission.

Seema Patel has served the City of San Mateo with distinction, and I ﬁrmly believe her continued service on the Planning Commission would be a tremendous beneﬁt to the City and its residents. I strongly support her reappointment and respectfully urge the City Council to reappoint her to the Planning Commission.

Sincerely,
Maxwell Schaumkel
Planning Commissioner
City of San Mateo

151 of 153

1 Alby Calles
From: Maggie Trinh
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2026 4:59 PM
To: City Council (San Mateo)
Subject: Please Re-Appoint Seema Patel to Planning Commission Good afternoon,

Writing here in my personal capacity, I urge you to re-appoint Seema Patel to her seat on the Planning Commission. Seema is a very thoughtful and dedicated public servant who understands the housing challenges we face. She has a deep care for the community and she has done so much amazing work for our city, and I appreciate her strong moral compass and capacity for nuance.

Thank you for your time and attention.

Warmly,

Maggie Trinh

152 of 153

153 of 153

San Mateo City CouncilMay 27, 2026

San Mateo City Council
May 27, 2026