Cities Index.
EML fr ACCE to City Councilmembers re Urgency Ordinance 011222

San Pablo City Council
January 18, 2022

Document
EML fr ACCE to City Councilmembers re Urgency Ordinance 011222
Meeting
January 18, 2022
Body
San Pablo City Council
Original file
252 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on sanpablo.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

To: Matt Rodriguez
Cc: Lynn Tracy Nerland
Subject: Fwd: Urgency ordinance
Date: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 8:54:30 PM
Attachments: 2022-01-12 - San Pablo Proposed Ordiancen.docx FYI .

Get Outlook for Android
From: Leah Simon-Weisberg <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 8:43:06 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; Arturo Cruz <[email protected]> Cc: David Sharples <[email protected]>
Subject: Urgency ordinance

Dear Councilmembers Xavier, Ponce, Pabon-Alvarado and Cruz, I am the Legal Director for ACCE Institute. I am writing on behalf of the tenants at the Porto Apartments that are facing eviction. The tenants are calling on you to pass a local just cause for eviction ordinance. Local legislation can easily close the loopholes in the state just cause ordinance that allows landlords to

evict tenants permanently when a landlord alleges that they will be undertaking substantial rehabilitation. The landlord is not required to allow the tenants back into the unit at the same rent.

The twentyone jurisdictions that have local ordinances-- over 15 are located

in the bay area- all limit these evictions and require a right of return at the same rental amount.

San Pablo must join these jurisdictions that protect
tenants against speculators using eviction as a pretext in order to

circumvent the state rent cap.

Presently, there are 6 families facing eviction located at Porto Apartments 2235 Church Lane, San Pablo because the landlord claims that he wants to do major upgrades that will require the tenants to be out for 4 months.

He
has pulled permits to replace kitchens and bathrooms and windows. A

simple review of the permits makes it clear that 4 months would not be necessary. It is further concerning because the language of the notice alleges that it is in response to a notice by the city --which is untrue.

The landlord purchased the property just before the beginning of the pandemic. Upon purchase, he immediately served an unlawful 30-day notice to vacate all 14 units. Many tenants moved out based on that

illegitimate notice. There are presently only 8 families remaining and 6

empty units. Shortly after the Contra Costa Covid-19 Pandemic Moratorium

ended, the landlord served the tenants 60-day notice based on “Substantial Rehabilitation.” Tenants have asked the landlord to temporarily move them to empty units while the repairs would be made.

The landlord has said no

but has offered that they may return and pay $2500 for a two bedroom.

These are more than triple what tenants are paying and beyond their ability to pay.

The tenants appreciate that on January 18th, you will consider passing a local
just cause for eviction ordinance which will close the substantial

rehabilitation loophole. However, in order to prevent the tenants from being

evicted they need you to pass an urgency ordinance on the 18th. Such an ordinance can stop these kinds of evictions while a permanent ordinance can be passed. The landlord can lawfully file in court as early as January 17th.

We understand that this will take work but we urge you to place the

attached urgency ordinance on the agenda for the January 18th meeting. I am available to answer any questions.

Leah
--
Leah Simon-Weisberg
Legal Director
Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment - ACCE, Institute 2220 Livingston Street, Suite 214, Oakland, CA 94606
mobile: (323) 842-8614 | [email protected]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message may contain information that is confidential and/or subject to attorney-client privilege. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy or disclose this message (or any information contained herein or attached hereto). If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message.

← All documents from this meeting