Att 2 - AGR Brown & Caldwell Trash Reduction Plan 052223 — San Pablo City Council, June 5, 2023

Updated: 3/23 Page 1

CITY OF SAN PABLO

AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES
Project No.0907/ Agreement No. 1

THIS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), effective the 06 day of June, 2023 (“Effective Date”), is by and between the City of San Pablo, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, ( “City”), and Brown and Caldwell, a California corporation, (“Consultant”) (individually, a “Party,” and collectively, the “Parties”).

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the City desires to engage a consultant to provide professional services to update the City’s C.10 Trash Load Reduction Compliance Plan to ensure full compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit’s C.10 requirements and to assist in the implementation of the updated plan services to the City (“Services”) as further set forth in this Agreement;

WHEREAS, the City desires to engage a consultant who will act at all times in the City’s best interest and will respect the trust and confidence placed in that consultant by the City; and

WHEREAS, Consultant has represented to City that Consultant has the special training, skill, competence and expertise necessary to provide the Services needed by the City; desires to enter into this Agreement with the City as an independent contractor; and is willing to provide the Services on the following terms and conditions.

NOW, THEREFORE, Consultant and the City agree as follows:

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
(1) Scope of Services.

A. Scope of Services. Consultant agrees to provide the Services to the City as specified in, collectively, the scope of services set forth in the City’s Request for Proposals, dated March 23, 2023, and any addenda thereto (“ RFP”), attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein, and the scope of services set forth in Consultant’s proposal dated April 20, 2023 (“Proposal”) with their updated scope and budget dated May 15, 2023, attached as Exhibit B and incorporated herein. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between any of the terms of the RFP, the Proposal, and this Agreement, the terms most favorable to the City will prevail. Any services not encompassed in this Section (1) are additional services (“ Additional Services”) subject to prior written authorization by the City, as further specified below in Section (3), “Additional Services.”

B. Standard of Performance. Consultant will provide the Services and any authorized Additional Services in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and in a manner consistent with the level of skill and care ordinarily exercised under similar conditions by members of the Consultant’s profession; in accordance with the terms, conditions, and objectives of this Agreement; and in a manner consistent with the standard of performance provided herein.

Consultant represents that it possesses the necessary skills, background, and licenses to perform the Services or Additional Services. If, during the course of this Agreement, the City Manager notifies Consultant that the S ervices fail to comply with the standard of performance provided herein in whole or in part, Consultant will promptly take the corrective action required to correct Updated: 3/23 Page 2
the non-conforming services at no extra cost to the City. Failure to promptly take such corrective action constitutes a material breach of this Agreement and cause for termination in the City’s discretion. This standard of care will not be construed to impose a mandatory duty on the City within the meaning of Government Code section 815.6. The City’s acceptance of Services performed under this Agreement will not operate to waive or release Consultant’s obligation under this paragraph.

C. COVID-19 Pandemic. All City of San Pablo programs and services must be in compliance with current health orders issued by Contra Costa County Health Services at: https://www.coronavirus.cchealth.org/health-orders. Consultant shall comply with these requirements and contact City staff immediately if there is any issue with compliance. In addition, the City requires all contractors/consultants providing services at City facilities or City worksites to comply with all City’s current COVID policies on-site as they may be amended from time to time.

D. Time is of the Essence. In the performance of this Agreement, time is of the essence. Consultant must be available to begin providing the Services upon the Effective Date of this Agreement, and must complete the Services within the time specified in Section (4), “Effective Date and Term.” Consultant shall not be responsible for or be deemed to be in breach of this Agreement as a result of delays caused by circumstances beyond its reasonable control provided Consultant has not contributed to circumstances causing or extending such delay.

E. Primary Service Provider. The City has approved of Jeff Sinclair as Consultant’s primary provider of the Services under this Agreement, and no other person will be accepted as the primary provider of the Services without the City’s prior written consent.

F . Labor Code Compliance. If the Services are “public works” services as defined in Labor Code section 1720 et seq. and the Agreement is for an amount greater than $1,000, the Agreement is subject to all applicable requirements of Chapter 1 of Part 7 of Division 2 of the Labor Code, beginning at section 1720, and the related regulations, including but not limited to requirements pertaining to wages, working hours and workers’ compensation insurance.

Consultant must also post all job site notices required by laws or regulations pursuant to Labor Code section 1771.4.

1. Prevailing Wages: Each worker performing Services under this Agreement that is covered under Labor Code section 1720 or 1720.9, must be paid at a rate not less than the prevailing wage as defined in sections 1771 and 1774 of the Labor Code. The prevailing wage rates are on file with the City and are available online at http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1775, Consultant and any subconsultant will forfeit to City as a penalty up to $200 for each calendar day, or portion of a day, for each worker paid less than the applicable prevailing wage rate, in addition to paying each worker the difference between the applicable wage rate and the amount actually paid.

2. Working Day: Pursuant to Labor Code section 1810, eight hours of labor consists of a legal day’s work. Pursuant to Labor Code section 1813, Consultant will forfeit to City as a penalty the sum of $25 for each day during which a worker employed by Consultant or any subconsultant is required or permitted to work more than eight hours during any one calendar day, or more than 40 hours per calendar week, unless such workers are paid overtime wages under Labor Code section 1815. All Updated: 3/23 Page 3
Services must be carried out during regular City working days and hours unless otherwise specified in the scope of services or authorized in writing by City.

3. Payroll Records: Consultant and its subconsultants must maintain certified payroll records in compliance with Labor Code sections 1776 and 1812, and all implementing regulations promulgated by the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”). For each payroll record, Consultant and its subconsultants must certify under penalty of perjury that the information in the record is true and correct, and that it has complied with the requirements of Labor Code sections 1771, 1811, and 1815. Unless the Agreement is for an amount under $25,000, Consultant must electronically submit certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner as required under California law and regulations.

4. Apprentices: If the amount of the Agreement is $30,000 or more, Consultant must comply with the apprenticeship requirements in Labor Code section 1777.5.

5. DIR Monitoring, Enforcement, and Registration: The Services are subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5, and, subject to the exception set forth below, Consultant and any subconsultants must be registered with the DIR to perform public works projects.

The registration requirements of Labor Code section 1725.5 do not apply if the Agreement is for an amount under $25,000.

(2) Compensation. As full compensation for the satisfactory and timely performance of the Services as specified in Section (1), “Scope of Services,” and the attached exhibits, City hereby agrees to pay Consultant a sum not to exceed One Hundred Two Thousand One Hundred Fifty-Four Dollars ($102,154) as follows:

On a deliverables basis at rates set forth in Exhibit B.

Consultant will be paid all undisputed amounts within thirty (30) days of City’s receipt of detailed invoices for Services provided to the City Manager’s satisfaction during the preceding calendar month. Invoices must include all of the information contained in Section (7), “Billings,” below. Each invoice must be signed by an authorized representative of Consultant, verifying that the invoiced Services have been performed. Consultant will not be entitled to compensation for Additional Services, as defined below in Section (3), unless authorized by City in writing in advance, and memorialized in an amendment to this Agreement executed by the authorized representatives of each Party. This Section (2) supersedes any conflicting or inconsistent provisions in the Proposal.

(3) Additional Services. In addition to the S ervices included in Section (1), “Scope of Services,” the Parties may from time to time agree that Consultant will provide Additional Services for additional compensation, as authorized by the City Manager. The nature and scope of the Additional Services, including the time for performance and terms for mutually agreeable additional compensation must be memorialized in a writing, executed by both Parties, as further specified in Section ( 25), “Amendments,” before Consultant may begin providing the Additional Services. Consultant will not be entitled to compensation for any Additional Services performed without a written amendment to include the Additional Services in this Agreement. If Consultant believes that services that it is directed to perform by City are not included in Section (1), “Scope of Services,” Consultant will promptly notify the City in writing of the basis for this belief. If the City agrees that the subject services are not included in Section (1), “Scope of Services,” the Parties will promptly execute a writing to authorize the services as Additional Services for mutually Updated: 3/23 Page 4
agreed-upon additional compensation. Except as otherwise specified in the written authorization, all Additional Services are subject to the same terms and conditions as all Services under this Agreement, including, billing, record -keeping, reporting, insurance, indemnity, and compliance with all applicable laws and standards.

(4) Effective Date and Term. The term of this Agreement (“Term”) begins on the Effective Date set forth above, and expires on June 30, 2024. If the Term expires later than the end of the City’s fiscal year, the continuation of the Term into the next fiscal year will be contingent upon the City’s lawful encumbrance or appropriation of new funds for the Agreement.

(5) Assignment and Subcontracting. A substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement was, and is, the reputation and competence of Consultant. The assignment or subcontracting of this Agreement by Consultant, or any interest therein, is prohibited without the prior written approval of the City Manager. The City has authorized Consultant to use the following Subconsultants/Subcontractors as specified:

Subconsultant/Subcontractor Name Subconsultant/Subcontractor Services

N/A N/A

(6) Independent Contractor Status. It is expressly understood and agreed by the Parties that Consultant, while providing Services pursuant to this Agreement, is an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. Consultant is solely responsible for the means and methods by which it provides the Services. Consultant is solely responsible for all matters relating to the payment of its employees, including compliance with social security, withholding tax and all other laws and regulations governing such matters. Consultant is s olely responsible for its own acts and those of its agents and employees during the Term of this Agreement. Consultant will not represent, at any time or in any manner, that Consultant is an employee of the City. Consultant will exercise its judgment in r ecommending to City the methods by which to accomplish City’s objectives and needs. Consultant acknowledges that the City will provide no training. Consultant will provide whatever tools and materials that are necessary to complete a client engagement.

Consultant is free to accept, and has accepted in the past, other client engagements. Consultant is responsible for purchasing, bringing, providing, and controlling any and all equipment, tools, instruments, etc. needed for completion of the Services set forth herein, as well as for maintenance and use of such equipment. It is understood that Consultant is hired on a temporary basis only, and that if the City and/or Consultant desires to continue Consultant’s services after expiration of the Term or termination of this Agreement, Consultant must enter into a new agreement.

(7) Billings. Consultant's invoices must include the following information: (a) a brief description of S ervices performed, including any Additional Services ; (b) the date the Services were performed; (c) the number of hours spent and by whom ; (d) the current Agreement not-to- exceed amount; (e) the amount previously billed ; (f) the total paid to date; (g) the outstanding balance due, if any; (h) the current invoice amount; (i) total amount billed against the Agreement to date; (j) the remaining balance of the not-to-exceed amount; and (k) the Consultant’s signature.

Except as specifically authorized by City, Consultant will not bill City for duplicate Services performed by mor e than one person. Consultant may not submit any billing for an amount in excess of the maximum amount of compensation authorized in Sections (2) and (3), above.

Consultant is solely responsible for its office and overhead costs, including furniture and Updated: 3/23 Page 5
equipment rental, supplies, salaries of employees, telephone calls, postage, advertising, and all other expenses incurred by Consultant in the performance of this Agreement.

(8) Advice and Status Reporting. Consultant will provide the City with timely reports, orally or in writing, of all significant developments arising during performance of its Services, and provide the City with information as is necessary to enable City to monitor the performance of this Agreement, including statements and data demonstrating the effectiveness of the Services provided in achieving the City’s express goals and objectives. The City may withhold payments otherwise due to Consultant pending timely delivery of all such reports and information.

Consultant will promptly notify the City Manager of any matters that could adversely affect Consultant’s ability or eligibility to continue to provide Services under this Agreement.

(9) Retention of Records. Consultant’s complete files, including all records, employee time sheets, and correspondence pertaining to the Services will be available for review by the City upon request, and copies of pertinent reports and correspondence will be furnished for the City’s files upon request by the City. Consultant will maintain adequate documentation to substantiate all charges for hours and materials charged to City under this Agreement. Consultant will maintain the records and any other records related to the Services or this Agreement and will allow City access to such records for a period of four years after the expiration of the Term or termination of the Agreement. At City’s request, or upon expiration or termination of this Agreement, Consultant will return to City all plans, maps, cost estimates, project financial records, reports, and related documents. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consultant may retain a confidential file copy of any Confidential file copy of information it receives and relied on in order to perform its services. Upon payment to Consultant all research information, plans, diagrams, financial records, reports, cost estimates or other documents prepared or obtained under the terms of this Agreement will be delivered to and become the property of the City and all data prepared or obtained under this Agreement will be made available, upon request, to the City without restrictions or limitations on their use. City’s reuse of such information for any project or purpose other than the services pursuant to this Agreement is at the City’s sole risk. This Section (9) will survive expiration of the Term or termination of the Agreement.

(10) Written Reports and Documents. In accordance with Government Code section 7550, if the total compensation paid to Consultant under this Agreement exceeds $5,000, any document or written report prepared by Consultant for or under the direction of City will contain the numbers and dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation of such document or written report. The contract and subcontract numbers and dollar amounts shall be contained in a separate section of such document or written report. When multiple documents or reports are the subject or product of this Agreement, the disclosure section may also contain a statement indicating that the total contract amount represents compensation for multiple documents or reports.

(11) Record and Fiscal Control System. Consultant will maintain its financial records and fiscal control systems in a commercially reasonable manner. Consultant will maintain personnel and payroll records to adequately identify the source and application of all received funds; withhold income taxes; pay employment taxes ( including Social Security), unemployment compensation, worker's compensation and other taxes as may be due. Consultant will maintain an effective system of internal control to assure that funds provided through the City are used solely for authorized purposes.

(12) Access to Records; Audits . The City will have access at any time during normal business hours and as often as necessary to any bank account and books, records, documents, Updated: 3/23 Page 6
accounts, files, reports, and other property and papers of Consultant relating to the Services to be provided under this Agreement for the purpose of making an audit, review, survey, examination, excerpt or transcript.

(13) Consultant’s Testimony. Unless the Services include serving as an expert witness, Consultant agrees to consult with City and testify at City’s request at no additional cost other than normal witness fees if litigation is brought against City in connection with Consultant ’s Services.

This Section (12) will survive expiration of the Term or termination of the Agreement.

(14) Assignment of Personnel . Consultant will only assign competent and qualified personnel to perform the Services. If City asks Consultant to remove a person assigned to the Services, Consultant agrees to do so immediately regardless of the reason, or the lack of a reason, for City's request.

Best’s financial strength rating of “A” or better and a financial size rating of “VII” or better. If Consultant fails to provide any of the required coverage in full compliance with the requirements of this Agreement, City may, at its sole discretion and in addition to any other remedies, purchase such coverage at Consultant’s expense and deduct the cost from payments due to Consultant, suspend performance of the Services under the Agreement, or terminate Consultant for default.

The procurement of the required insurance will not be construed to limit Consultant’s liability under this Agreement or to fulfill Consultant’s indemnification obligations under this Agreement. If coverage limits carried by Consultant exceed the minimum limits specified below, the higher limits will be deemed to be required by this Agreement.

A. Policies and Limits. Consultant must procure and maintain the following insurance policies and limits at all times during the Term of this Agreement:

1. Commercial General Liability Insurance (“CGL”): The CGL policy must be issued on an occurrence basis, written on a comprehensive general liability form (CG 00 01) or its equivalent, and must include coverage for liability arising from the operations of Consultant or its subconsultants or subcontractors in the performance of the Services, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal and advertising injury with limits of at least $2,000,000.00 per occurrence. The CGL coverage may be arranged under a single policy for the full limits required or by a combination of underlying policies with the balance provided by excess or umbrella policies, provided each such policy complies with the requirements set forth herein.

2. Automobile Liability: The automobile liability policy must provide coverage of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single-limit per accident for bodily injury, death or property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability: If the Consultant has employees, t he policy must comply with the requirements of the California Updated: 3/23 Page 7
Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Safety Act, providing coverage of at least $1,000,000.00, or as otherwise required by law.

4. Professional Liability: The professional liability insurance policy must insure against the Consultant’s errors and omissions in the provision of Services under this Agreement, in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00 combined single limit.

Any deductible or self-insured retention may not exceed $50,000. The professional liability policy must include prior acts coverage sufficient to cover all Services provided by the Consultant for this Agreement, and the coverage must continue in effect for five years following final payment to Consultant. The following provisions apply if the professional liability policy is written on a claims-made form:

a. The retroactive date of the policy must be shown and must be on or before the Effective Date of the Agreement.

b. The insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for a continuous period of at least five years following expiration of the Term or termination of the Agreement, whichever occurs first.

c. If the coverage is canceled or not renewed and is not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date that is on or before the Effective Date of this Agreement, Consultant must provide extended reporting coverage for a minimum of five years following expiration of the Term or termination of the Agreement, whichever occurs first. The City has the right to procure, at Consultant’s cost, any extended reporting provisions of the policy if the Consultant cancels or fails to renew the coverage.

d. A copy of the claim reporting requirements must be submitted to the City before Consultant may begin performing Services under this Agreement.

B. Required Endorsements. The insurance provided by Consultant must include the following endorsements as specified below. The endorsements must be executed by a person authorized to bind the issuing insurer. The endorsements are to be provided on forms provided, specified, or approved by the City. As an alternative to the City’s forms, the Consultant’s insurer(s) may provide complete copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements.

1. Additional Insured Endorsements : The General Liability and Automobile Liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

a. The City, its office rs, officials, employees, and volunteers (“Additional Insureds”) will be covered as additional insureds with respect to all covered liability. This must be provided in the form of an additional insured endorsement to the Consultant’s insurance policy, using form CG 20 10 07 04 and GC 20 37 07 04, or equivalents approved by the City. For design professionals f orm CG 20 10 07 04 may be used. Alternatively, the additional insured endorsement may be provided as a separate owner’s policy that complies with all of the requirements set forth in this Section 15. b. The inclusion of more than one insured will not operate to impair the rights of one insured against another, and the policies will apply as though separate policies have been issued to each of the Additional Insureds.

Updated: 3/23 Page 8
c. The insurance provided by the Consultant is primary and no insurance or self-insurance held or owned by any of the Additional Insureds may be called upon to contribute to a loss or defense.
d. Any failure by Consultant to comply with the reporting requirements fo r a policy will not affect nor abridge the coverage provided for any Additional Insureds.
e. The coverage or endorsement will not contain any limitations on the scope of protection available to the Additional Insureds.

2. Notice: Each insurance policy req uired by this clause must provide or be endorsed to state that coverage will not be reduced, canceled, or allowed to expire without at least 30 days written notice to the City, unless due to non- payment of premiums, in which case 10 days written notice is required.

3. Waiver of Subrogation: Each required policy must include an endorsement providing that the insurer will waive any right of subrogation it may have against the City. Consultant hereby agrees to waive subrogation which any insurer of Consultant may acquire from Consultant by virtue of the payment of any loss.

C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions . Any deductibles or self -insured retentions for the required insurance policies are subject to prior approval by the City Manager .

Before beginning performance of the Services, Consultant must disclose the amounts of the deductibles and self-insured retentions that apply to the required policies . If the City Manager determines that the deductible or self -insured retention for any required policy is unacceptably high, at the option of City, (1) the insurer must reduce or eliminate the deductible or self-insured retention with respect to the Additional Insureds, or (2) the Consultant must provide a bond or financial guarantee satisfactor y to the City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses. During the Term of this Agreement, Consultant may not increase any deductibles or self -insured retentions with respect to the Additional Insureds, without the prior written consent of the City Manager. The City Manager may condition such consent upon the Consultant procur ing a bond or financial guarantee that is satisfactory in form to the City, guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses.

D. Subconsultants or S ubcontractors. Consultant must ensure that each subconsultant or subcontractor is required to maintain the same insurance coverage required for Consultant under this Section (15), with respect to its performance of Services, including the required endorsements. Consultant must confirm that each subconsultant or subcontractor has complied with these insurance requirements before the subconsultant or subcontractor is permitted to begin Services under this Agreement. Upon request by the City, Consultant must provide certificates and endorsements submitted by each subconsultant or subcontractor to prove compliance with this requirement. The insurance requirements for subconsultants or subcontractors do not replace or limit the Consultant insurance obligations.

(16) Indemnification. The terms and conditions set forth in subsection 16(A) , below, are applicable to this Agreement if the Services to be provided by Consultant are not “design professional” services as used and defined in Civil Code section 2782.8 (architect, landscape architect, engineering, or land surveyor services). The terms and conditions set forth in subsection 16(B), below, are applicable to this Agreement if the Services to be provided by Consultant are Updated: 3/23 Page 9
“design professional” services as used and defined in Civil Code section 2782.8 (architect, landscape architect, engineering, or land surveyor services).

A. Indemnification by Non-Design Professionals. Consultant shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify, defend (with counsel acceptable to the City) and hold harmless City, and its employees, officials, volunteers and agents ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all losses, claims, damages, costs and liability of every nature arising out of or resulting from the negligence or willful misconduct in the performance of this Agreement by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, volunteers, subcontractors or sub-consultants, excepting only liability arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of City. Liabilities subject to the duties to defend and indemnify include, without limitation, all claims, losses, damages, penalties, fines, and judgments; associated investigation and administrative expenses; defense costs, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys’ fees; court costs; and costs of alternative dispute resolution.

1. The duty to defend is a separate and distinct obligation from the Consultant’s duty to indemnify. The Consultant shall be obligated to defend, in all legal, equitable, administrative, or special proceedings, with counsel approved by the City, the City and its directors, officers, and employees, immediately upon tender to the Consultant of the claim in any form or at any stage of an action or proceeding, whether or not liability is established. An allegation or determination of comparative active negligence or willful misconduct by an Indemnified Party does not relieve the Consultant from its separate and distinct obligation to defend City . The obligation to defend extends through final judgment, including exhaustion of any appeals. The defense obligation includes an obligation to provide independent defense counsel if the Consultant asserts that liability is caused in whole or in part by the negligence or willful misconduct of an Indemnified Party. To the extent that such final judgment, arbitration award, order, settlement, or other final resolution allocates or assigns proportionate fault for the claims between Consultant and City, City shall reimburse Consultant for attorneys’ fees and defense costs as were incurred defending Indemnified Parties against claims in an amount reflecting the percentage of City’s proportionate fault.

2. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, subconsultant or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System ( “PERS”) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, subconsultants or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.

3. The review, acceptance or approval of the Consultant’s Services or work product by any Indemnified Party shall not affect, relieve or reduce the Consultant’s indemnification or defense obligations. The provisions of this Section are not limited by and do not affect the provisions of this Agreement relating to insurance.

4. Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Consultant from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply.

Updated: 3/23 Page 10

5. By execution of this Agreement, Consultant acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration, and that these provisions survive the termination of this Agreement.

B . Indemnification by Design Professionals. Consistent with California Civil Code section 2782.8 (“section 2782.8”), when the S ervices to be provided under this Agreement are to be performed by a “design professional, ” as that term is defined under section 2782.8, Consultant shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, and its employees, officials, volunteers and agents (“Indemnified Parties”) from and against any and all losses, claims, damages, costs and liability of every nature, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, to the extent caused in whole or in part by any negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subconsultants or subcontractors in performance of the Services under this Agreement, but excluding the sole or active negligence or willful misconduct of one or more of the Indemnified Parties. Defense costs shall not exceed Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault, except as set forth in section 2782.8.

1. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, subconsultant or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System ( “PERS”) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, subconsultants or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.

2. The review, acceptance or approval of the Consultant’s Services or work product by any Indemnified Party shall not affect, relieve or reduce the Consultant’s indemnification or defense obligations. The provisions of this Section are not limited by and do not affect the provisions of this Agreement relating to insurance.

3. Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endorsements required under this Agreement does not relieve Consultant from liability under this indemnification and hold harmless clause. This indemnification and hold harmless clause shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to apply.

4. By execution of this Agreement, Consultant acknowledges and agrees to the provisions of this Section and that it is a material element of consideration, and that these provisions survive the termination of this Agreement.

(17) Licenses. If a license of any kind, which term is intended to include evidence of registration, is required of Consultant, its employees, agents, or subcontractors by federal or state law, Consultant warrants that such license has been obtained, is valid and in good standing, and Consultant shall keep it in effect at all times during the Term of this Agreement, and that any applicable bond has been posted in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.

Consultant, its subconsultants, and subcontractors, will obtain and maintain a City of San Pablo Business License at all times during the Term of this Agreement.

(18) Employment Practices.

A. Employment of Local Residents. Pursuant to the San Pablo Economic Opportunity Updated: 3/23 Page 11
Policy, the Consultant and any subcontractors shall contact the San Pablo Economic Development Corporation (“EDC”) at [email protected] or 510-215-3200, at least ten business days prior to hiring or staffing for fulfillment of the Agreement, describing number, duties and qualifications needed for available positions, and shall fairly consider for employment any workers referred by the EDC within three business days. “Local Resident” means an individual having an adjusted household income of less than the Area Median Income for Contra Costa County, and domiciled in the City of San Pablo as of the relevant hiring date, with “domiciled” as defined by Section 349(b) of the California Election Code. Discrimination against Local Residents on the basis of their local status is prohibited.

B. Compliance With Law . Consultant represents that it is an Equal Opportunity Employer and shall comply with applicable regulations governing equal opportunity employment. Consultant shall not discriminate in the employment of any person because of race, color, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification pursuant to the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. Consultant shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”) in performing its obligations under this Agreement. Failure to comply with the provisions of the ADA shall be a material breach of, and grounds for the immediate termination of, this Agreement . In performing Services and providing services under this Agreement, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, comply with all applicable laws of the United States and the State of California; the Ordinances of the City of San Pablo; and the rules, regulations, orders , and directions of their respective administrative agencies and the officers thereof.

(19) Local Subcontracting – Outreach. Consultant shall contact the EDC at [email protected] or 510- 215-3200) at least two weeks prior to any subcontract award, providing notice and details regarding subcontracting opportunity. The EDC shall notify qualified local businesses of subcontracting opportunities, and provide technical assistance to qualified local businesses during the subcontracting bidding process.

(20) Termination.

A. Termination for Convenience. City may terminate this Agreement at its sole discretion at any time prior to expiration of the Term or completion by the Consultant of the Services required hereunder. Notice of termination of this Agreement shall be given in writing to the Consultant, and shall be sufficient and complete when same is deposited in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and certified, address as set forth below in Section ( 37), “Notices.” The Agreement shall be terminated upon the date set forth in the City’s Notice of Termination. If the City terminates this Agreement, the Consultant shall be compensated for all Services satisfactorily performed prior to the time of receipt of cancellation notice, and shall be compensated for materials ordered by the Consultant or its employees, or services of others ordered by the Consultant or its employees, prior to receipt of notice of cancellation whether or not such materials or final instruments of service of others have actually been delivered, provided that the Consultant or its employees are not able to cancel such orders for materials or services of others.

Compensation for the Consultant in the event of cancellation shall be determined by City in accordance with the percentage of Services completed and agreed to by the Consultant. In the event of cancellation, all notes, sketches, computations, drawings, and specifications or other data, whether complete or not, upon payment to Consultant remain the property of the City. The City may make copies or extract information from any such notes, sketches, computations, Updated: 3/23 Page 12
drawings, and specifications, or other data whether complete or not. City’s reuse of such information for any project or purpose other than the servies pursuant to this Agreement is at the City’s sole risk.

B. T ermination for Cause. City may terminate this Agreement for cause by providing Consultant with one day’s written notice of such termination if Consultant violates any of the terms and conditions of this A greement. In City’s discretion and at City’s option, such termination for cause may alternatively be accomplished, where Consultant fails to perform any of the obligations required of Consultant within the time and in the manner provided for under the terms of this Agreement, within seven days after receipt of the notice of such default. Upon City's termination of this Agreement for cause, City reserves the right to complete the Services by whatever means City deems expedient and the expense of completing such Services , as well as any and all damages to the extent caused by the negligent acts, intentional acts or errors or omissions of the Consultant, shall be charged to the Consultant.

C. Immediate Termination. City may terminate this Agreement immediately in any case where the Consultant engages in fraudule nt or criminal activities while performing the Services, or is otherwise determined to lack the necessary skills to accomplish the desired objectives.

(21) O wnership of Materials. Any and all documents, including draft documents where completed documents are unavailable, or materials prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, upon payment to Consultant, shall be the property of the City at the moment of their c ompleted preparation. All materials and records of a preliminary nature such as survey notes, sketches, preliminary plans, computations and other data, prepared or obtained in the performance of this Agreement, shall be made available, upon request, to City at no additional charge and without restriction or limitation on their use consistent with the intent of the original design. City’s reuse of such information for any project or purpose other than the Services pursuant to this Agreement is at the City’s sole risk.

(22) Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City's City Manager and approved as to form by the City Attorney. Such document shall expressly state that it is intended by the Parties to amend the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

(23) Abandonment by Consultant. In the event the Consultant ceases performing Services under this A greement or otherwise abandons the Agreement prior to completing all of the Services, Consultant shall, without delay, deliver to City all materials and records prepared or obtained in the performance of this Agreement, and shall be paid for the reasonable value of the Services performed up to the time of cessation or abandonment, less a deduction for any damages or additional expenses which City incurs as a result of such cessation or abandonment.

Consultant agrees to be financially responsible and to compensate City for any costs incurred by City in retaining the services of another to replace Consultant, but only to the extent that the costs of retaining the replacement exceed what remaining amounts would have been paid to Consultant under the Agreement had Consultant completed the Services.

(24) Waiver. The waiver by either Party of a breach by the other of any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of either the same or a different provision of this Agreement.

Updated: 3/23 Page 13
(25) No Third-P arty Rights. The Parties do not i ntend to create rights in, or to grant remedies to, any third party as a beneficiary of this Agreement or of any duty, covenant, obligation, or undertaking established herein.

(26) Severability. Should any part of this A greement be declared by a final decision by a court or tribunal of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, invalid, or beyond the authority of either Party to enter into or carry out, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement, which shall continue in full force and effect, provided that the remainder of this Agreement, absent the unexcised portion, can be reasonably interpreted to give effect to the intentions of the Parties.

(27) Compliance with Laws. In the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall abide by and conform to any and all applicable laws of the United States, the State of California, and City ordinances. Consultant warrants that all Services done under this A greement will be in compliance with all applicable safety rules, laws, statutes and practices, including but not limited to Cal/OSHA regulations.

(28) Controlling Law and Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California , and venue for any legal action arising from or relating to this Agreement will be in the Superior Court of Contra Costa County, and no other place. Consultant hereby waives the removal provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 394.

(29) Breach. In the event that Consultant fails to perform any of the S ervices described in this Agreement or otherwise breaches the Agreement, City shall have the right to pursue all remedies provided by law and equity. Neither payment by the City nor performance by Consultant shall be construed as a waiver of either Party's rights or remedies against the other. Failure to require full and timely performance of any provision, at any time, shall not waive or reduce the right to insist upon complete and timely performance of such provision thereafter. In the event of any suit, action or proceeding brought by either Party for breach of any term hereof or to enforce any provision hereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney’ s fees.

(30) Inspection by Other Agencies. Authorized representatives of the Federal Government, the California Department of Transportation, or other government agencies which provide grant funding (if any) for this Agreement and the City have the right to inspect Consultant’s performance of the Services, files, and work product.

(31) Conflict of Interest. Consultant warrants and covenants that Consultant presently has no interest in, nor shall any interest be acquired in, any matter which will render the services required under the provisions of this Agreement a violation of any applicable state, local, or federal law. In the event that any conflict of interest should nevertheless arise, Consultant shall promptly notify City of the existence of such conflict of interest so that the City may determine whether to terminate this Agreement. Consultant further warrants its compliance with the Political Reform Act (Gov. Code section 81000 et seq.) respecting this A greement. Where City Manager determines, based on facts provided by C ity staff, that Consultant meets the criteria of section 18701 of the FPPC regulations, the individual providing services under this Agreement shall be considered a “designated employee” under the City’s conflict of interest code, and shall be required to complete FPPC Form 700 regarding his or her economic interests in a timely manner.

(32) Copyright. Upon City's request, Consultant shall execute appropriate documents to assign to the City the copyright to work created pursuant to this A greement. The issuance of a Updated: 3/23 Page 14
patent or copyright to Consultant or any other person shall not affect City's rights to the materials and records prepared or obtained in the performance of this Agreement. City reserves a license to use such materials and records without restriction or limitation consistent with the intent of the original design, and City shall not be required to pay any additional fee or royalty for such materials or records. The license reserved by City shall continue for a period of fifty years from the Effective Date unless extended by operation of law or otherwise.

(33) Whole Agreement . This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties. This A greement integrates all of the terms and conditions mentioned herein or incidental hereto and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the Parties with respect to all or any part of the subject matter hereof.

(34) Authority of Parties. Each of the signatories to this Agreement warrants that he or she has the authority to enter into and execute this Agreement and to bind the entity or entities on whose behalf they sign.

(35) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in duplicate counterparts.

(36) Multiple Copies of Agreement . Multiple copies of this A greement may be executed but the parties agree that the Agreement on file in the office of the City Clerk is the version of the Agreement that shall take precedence should any differences exist among counterparts of the document.

(37) Notices. Notices required by this Agreement shall be personally delivered or mailed, postage prepaid, as follows:

To Consultant: Mike Flake, Vice President
201 N. Civic Drive, Ste. 300
Walnut Creek, CA 94596

To the City: City Manager, City of San Pablo
San Pablo City Hall
1000 Gateway Avenue
San Pablo, CA 94806

Each Party shall provide the other Party with telephone and written notice of any change in address as soon as practicable. Notices given by personal delivery shall be effective immediately.

Notices given by mail shall be deemed to have been delivered forty-eight hours after having been deposited in the United States mail.

(38) Federal Funding Requirements (if applicable). If this Agreement is subject to federal funding, in whole or in part, it must comply with the uniform federal award procurement requirements set forth in 2 CFR §§ 200.318 – 200.327, as may be amended from time to time, and contain the applicable provisions described in Appendix II to Part 200 – Contract Provisions for non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards, which are attached to this Agreement as Exhibit C. In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between Exhibit C, Exhibit D, if applicable, and this Agreement, Exhibit C will control.

___ This Agreement is subject to federal funding. See Exhibit C. __X_ This Agreement is not subject to federal funding.

Updated: 3/23 Page 15
(39) Caltrans Funding Requirements (if applicable). If this Agreement is for architectural and/or engineering services subject to reimbursement or funding, in whole or in part, by Caltrans and administered under the Local Assistance Procedures Manual (“LAPM”), it must include the provisions set forth in Exhibit D, Mandatory Fiscal and Federal Provisions for Architectural and Engineering Consultant Contracts Subject to Caltrans Funding. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between Exhibit D and this Agreement, Exhibit D will control.

__ This Agreement is subject to funding by Caltrans. See Exhibit D. _X_ This Agreement is not subject to funding by Caltrans.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Consultant has executed this A greement, and the City, by its City Manager, who is authorized to do so, has executed this Agreement.

APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF SAN PABLO
A Municipal Corporation

By _______________________________ By ___________________________________ Teresa L. Stricker, City Attorney Matt Rodriguez, City Manager

Date signed:___________________________

Brown and Caldwell

By ___________________________________
Consultant, Mike Flake, Vice President

Date signed:___________________________
ATTEST:

By _______________________________ Date signed:___________________________ Dorothy Gantt, City Clerk

Attachments: Exhibit A: Request for Proposals, dated March 23, 2023 Exhibit B-1: Consultant’s Proposal, dated April 20, 2023 Exhibit B-2: Consultant’s Updated Scope and Budget, dated May 15, 2023

Updated: 3/23 Page 16
Exhibit A
City of San Pablo RFP

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

ENGINEERING DIVISION

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

AND STATEMENT OF

QUALIFICATIONS

NPDES C.10
Trash Load Reduction
Compliance Plan
Consultant Services

March 23, 2023

Proposals Must Be Received By:

April 20, 2023 by 4:00 p.m.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A. INTRODUCTION

1. About San Pablo

2. Purpose for Request for Proposals

B. SCOPE OF WORK

1. Project Description

2. Scope of Services

C. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

1. Letter of Interest

2. Firm Statement of Qualifications

3. Staff Statement of Qualifications or Resumes

4. Project Management and Staff Availability

5. Project Approach

6. Schedule of Work

7. Cost Proposal

8. Method of Payment

9. References

10. Consultant Contract Statement

D. PROPOSAL CONDITIONS

1. Local Employment and Contracting Opportunities

2. Questions

3. General Terms and Conditions

4. Agreement

E. PROPOSAL PROCEDURE

1. Submission of Proposals

2. Consultant Selection Process

3. Evaluation Criteria

4. Tentative Schedule

F. ATTACHMENTS

1 City of San Pablo
Request For Proposals
NPDES C.10 Trash Load Reduction Compliance Plan

A. INTRODUCTION

1. About San Pablo
San Pablo is located in West Contra Costa County off Interstate 80, minutes away from the Bay Area cultural centers of Berkeley, Oakland and San Francisco. Interstate 80 is the principal arterial route between the Bay Area and Sacramento. The City of San Pablo is nestled between the cities of Pinole and Richmond and by the neighboring cities of El Cerrito and Hercules. Historically one of the oldest Spanish settlements in the region, San Pablo has become a thriving residential and business community with a population of about 32,000 in an area of approximately two and one -half square miles. Additional information about the City can be obtained from the City of San Pablo website:
www.sanpabloca.gov.

2. Purpose for Request for Proposals
The City of San Pablo (“City”) invites professional consultant s to submit competitive proposals in response to this Request for Proposals and Statement of Qualifications (“RFP/SOQ”). The San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFBRWQCB) adopted the third reissuance of the Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit, or MRP 3.0 , in May 2022. Provision C.10 of the MRP require s local agencies to reduce trash loading from the municipal storm sewer systems within the prescribed deadlines.

The City seeks proposals for engineering assistance to develop a plan to meet these requirements.

B. SCOPE OF WORK

1. Project Description
The City of San Pablo (City) is seeking certified professionals to update the City’s C.10 Trash Load Reduction Compliance Plan to ensure full compliance with the C.10 requirements. The City is not expected to meet the C.10.a 90% compliance benchmark by June 30, 2023 without offsets or credits. Therefore, the City is required to submit an updated Trash Load Reduction Plan as described in Provision C.10.d with a schedule of implementation of additional trash load reduction actions sufficient to achieve compliance with the 90% benchmark (without offsets or credits), and 100% benchmark by June 30, 2025. The updated Trash Load Reduction Plan is required to be submitted with the City’s 2023 Annual Report.

2. Scope of Services
The Consultant selected shall provide services to review and update the City of San Pablo’s 2014 C.10 Long-Term Trash Load Reduction Plan . The Scope of Services includes, but is not limited to the following:

A. Review the City’s 2014 Long-Term Trash Load Reduction Plan (Exhibit 1.)

2 City of San Pablo
Request for Proposals
NPDES C.10 Trash Load Reduction Compliance Plan

B. Review the City’s trash capture devices installed to date . The City’s Full Trash Capture and Trash Management Area Map is included in Exhibit 2.

C. Review City Staff “Section by Section Analysis of Trash Management Strategy” Table ( Exhibit 3 .) Staff has prepared an inventory of individual addresses of concern within the City and the presumed trash generation rates, current conditions, items still undetermined, and potential trash management strategies.

D. Update the City’s trash generation maps and analyze drainage areas.

E. Recommend actions to achieve the 90% and 100% compliance requirements by the required deadlines. Recommended actions can include:
(1) Public Full Trash Capture (FTC) Devices – Locations of FTC devices (large and small) within the public right of way or on public property . This will also include an analysis if devices are feasible , a cost estimate to install these devices, and an estimate of maintenance requirements.
(2) Private FTC – Locations where new ordinances are feasible to require the installation of private FTC devices.
(3) Locations for on -land cleanups with On -land Visual Trash Assessments (OVTAs). On-land cleanups may include an ordinance to require private businesses to perform clean-ups when FTC is not feasible in addition to areas where public on-land cleanup will be necessary.
(4) Other feasible recommendations as identified.

F. After review and discussion of recommendations with City staff , update the 2014 Long-Term Trash Load Reduction Plan no later than August 1 5, 2023 for compliance with NPDES provision C.10.d as described in Provision C.10.d including a schedule of additional trash load reduction control actions sufficient to achieve compliance with the 90 percent compliance benchmark within a reasonable timeframe, and the 100 percent compliance benchmark by June 30, 2025 to be submitted with the City’s 2023 Annual Report.

Deliverables:

1. Updated Long -Term Trash Load Reduction Plan in compliance with Provision C.10.d

2. Updated GIS Trash Management Area Map

Optional Tasks (to be completed by February 1, 2024) may include:

A. Assist the City on the development of an RFP for the installation of recommended FTC devices on public land. This would include assessments on private properties as documentation for ordinance implementation.

3 City of San Pablo
Request for Proposals
NPDES C.10 Trash Load Reduction Compliance Plan

B. Assist the City on the development of an RFP for on-land clean-ups in select public locations in the City.

C. Assist the City on the development of an Ordinance for private properties to install FTC devices and/or develop Maintenance Plans for frequent on-land clean-ups.

C. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

Each Proposal must be submitted in compliance with the requirements of this RFP. The City may, acting in its sole discretion, elect to reject any Proposal that it determines to be nonresponsive. It reserves the right, but not the obligation, to waive any immaterial irregularities. Clarity and brevity are preferable to volume , submittals shall be li mited to 25 pages, excluding proposal cover, cover lett er, table of contents, and dividers. Each Proposal must include the following, organized as Sections 1 through 10:

1. Letter of Interest/ Cover Letter
A letter of interest/ cover letter must be provided transmitting the firm(s) submittal for consideration. The letter of interest/ cover letter must identify which service area(s) the firm(s) are submitting the proposal for and must be signed by the person authorized to negotiate a contract for proposed services with the City on behalf of the team.

2. Firm Statement of Qualifications
Provide the qualifications and experience of the firm(s) proposed for the project in the submittal. This should include information describing the team’s experience with:
a. Trash assessment and management strategies acceptable to the SFBRWQCB.
b. Analyzing and determining drainage areas.
c. Providing programs that successfully meet regional and state program requirements.
d. Reporting and negotiating with the RWQCB and other regulatory entities. e. The ability to provide similar services under similar time constraints. f. Working collaboratively with members of the community regarding trash reduction and management.

3. Staff Statement of Qualifications or Resumes
Provide the qualifications or resumes of key personnel proposed for the project in the submittal. In this section, identify similar/related projects that key members of the submittal have worked on. Note: key team members identified in the sub mittal shall not change in the executed contract unless notified and approved by the City.

4. Project Management and Staff Availability
Consultants should have one individual who will function as the main coordinator and point of contact for all the other consultants and sub -consultants; he/she will oversee project updates under the direction of City staff. This person will monitor timelines, review and evaluate products, ensure quality control and assist in facilitating meetings. Any 4 City of San Pablo
Request for Proposals
NPDES C.10 Trash Load Reduction Compliance Plan

substitutes of staff after submittal is received must be provided in writing and approved by the City if the contract is awarded.

5. Project Approach
In five pages or less, describe the Consultant’s proposed approach to this project and if relevant the typical approach to projects similar to this one. The approach should identify how the consultant can provide these services.

6. Schedule of Work
The schedule of work must be i ncluded in the submittal in order to demonstrate the Consultants ability to accomplish all Project deadlines. The schedule of work must include milestones for deliverables of each required aspect. All tasks including deliverables of each sub-consultant must meet set individual deadlines and overall project schedule.

7. Cost Proposal
The cost proposal shall include a line -item cost estimate for each work task outlined in the scope of services plus a separate cost for meetings (cost per meeting) and all deliverables. The cost spreadsheet should be in a format that will allow City staff to determine the key project team member( s) proposed for each task and the number of management, technical, drafting and support personnel hours, cost per hour for each project team member and total cost envisioned for each task. Identify any other costs to be billed to the project including proj ect expenses and sub -consultant fees. Include any proposed mark -up for sub -consultant fees. Include a copy of the proposed rate schedules(s) to be used throughout the project and any adjustments that are predicted to occur during the execution of the project.

Optional Tasks should be provided as separate line-items with any appropriate sub-tasks shown with related costs individually.

8. Method of Payment
The method of payment for will be time and material with a not -to-exceed amount. Any Optional Tasks contracted will also be time and material with a not-to-exceed amount.

9. References
Provide a short summary of at least three projects (one-page maximum) in progress or completed, with the following information for each:
a. Reference name, with current contact information
b. Type of project/work
c. Size and scale of the project
d. Current status

10. Consultant Contract Statement
Consultants will include a statement that the firm(s) accepts the terms of the City’s Consultant Agreement sample ( Exhibit 4) and/or the submittal will include a list of any proposed modifications to the Agreement by the consultant. 5 City of San Pablo
Request for Proposals
NPDES C.10 Trash Load Reduction Compliance Plan

D. PROPOSAL CONDITIONS

1. Local Employment and Contracting Opportunities
a. Employment of Local Residents
Pursuant to the San Pablo Economic Opportunity Policy, the Consultant and any subcontractors shall contact the San Pablo Economic Development Corporation (“EDC” at [email protected] or 510-215-3200) at least ten business days prior to hiring or staffing for fulfillment of the Contract, describing number, duties and qualifications needed for available positions, and shall fairly consider for employment any workers referred by the EDC within three business days. “Local Resident” means an individual having an adjusted household income of less than the Area Median Income for Contra Costa County, and domic iled in the City of San Pablo as of the relevant hiring date, with “domiciled” as defined by Section 349(b) of the California Election Code. Discrimination against Local Residents on the basis of their local status is prohibited.

b. Outreach to Local Businesses.

At least fourteen days prior to: (i) Consultant’s submission of a Proposal that includes specified subcontractors and (ii) Consultant’s award of any subcontract to a subcontractor not included in Consultant’s Proposal, Consultant will contact the San Pablo Economic Development Corporation (“EDC” at [email protected] or 510 -215-3200) and provide notice and details regarding subcontracting opportunities. The EDC will notify local businesses of subcontracting opportunities, and provide technical assistance to local businesses during the subcontracting bidding process.

2. Questions
Questions regarding this RFP /SOQ, the Project, or site access may be submitted in writing only and directed to Amanda Booth via email at [email protected].

Written responses will be provided in addenda to this RFP /SOQ posted via Planet Bids.

Written questions must be submitted no later than April 6, 2023 at 4:00 p.m.

3. General Terms and Conditions
a. All proposals, whether selected or rejected, shall become the property of the City.
b. The cost of RFP/SOQ preparation shall be that of the consulting firm and shall not be paid by the City.
c. Proposals shall be signed by an author ized employee in order to receive consideration.
d. City will not be responsible for proposals not submitte d by the Proposal Deadline defined in Section E, Item 1.
e. The successful proposer will be asked to enter into an agreement with the City reflecting the terms and conditions of the proposal based on the City's Professional Services Agreement (Agreement) requirements. A copy of the Agreement and Insurance requirem ents is included as Exhibit 4 to this RFP.

Proposals should include a list of any requested modifications to the Agreement 6 City of San Pablo
Request for Proposals
NPDES C.10 Trash Load Reduction Compliance Plan

by the consultant. The City will consider such reques ts, but makes no assurances to their granting. Award of an agreement is subject to approval by the City Council of the City of San Pablo.
f. Neither the City of San Pablo, it’s City Council, officers, employees, agents, representatives, nor any of its consultants will be liable for any claim or damages resulting from the RFP/SOQ process.
g. By submitting a proposal in response to this RFP, the proposer accepts the evaluation process and acknowledges and accepts that determination will require subjective judgments by the City. All information, documentation, and other materials submitted in response to this solicitation are considered non - confidential and/or non-proprietary and are subject to public disclosure after the solicitation is completed.

4. Agreement
A sample agreement is attached ( Exhibit 4) that includes terms regarding conflict of interest, insurance, indemnification and assignment. The consultant selected to perform the work will be required to comply with these terms.

E. PROPOSAL PROCEDURE

1. Submission of Proposals

All Proposals must be submitted via Planet Bids by April 20, 2023, no later than 4:00 p.m. (“Proposal Deadline”).

Proposals may not be modified after the Proposal Deadline. No paper submittals will be reviewed or considered.

2. Consultant Selection Process
The first step in the evaluation process will be to determine that each submittal contains all forms and other in formation required by this RFP /SOQ. Any submittals missing the required information may be considered nonresponsive and rejected without evaluation.

Submittals not received by Planet Bids by the Proposal Deadline are considered nonresponsive and shall be rejected. Submittal of additional information after the due date shall not be allowed.

All proposals will be evaluated by a City of San Pablo Selection Committee. The Selection Committee, made up of key City staff and other parties that may have expertise or experience in the services desc ribed herein, will review all submittals deemed complete according to the evaluation criteria and weighting factors below. The Selection Committee will make independent random checks of one or more of the consultant’s references. This reference check applies to major subconsultants as well.

The Selection Committee will establish a shortlist of consultants that are considered to be best qua lified to perform the contract work . The selection process may include oral 7 City of San Pablo
Request for Proposals
NPDES C.10 Trash Load Reduction Compliance Plan

interviews. The consultants will be notified of the time and place of oral interviews and of any additional information that may be required to be submitted.

Upon acceptance of the cost proposal and successful contract negotiations, staff will recommend a contract be awarded.

3. Evaluation Criteria
Proposals will be evaluated according to each criterion below. The scores for all the Criteria will be added for each proposal. The proposal with the highest score will be deemed as the best proposal. The total maximum score for any project is 100 points.

Criteria Maximum
Points
A Completeness of Response Pass/Fail
B Understanding of the Work/Project 25
C Experience with Similar Work 25
D Quality and Availability of Staff 15
E Schedule and Ability to Meet Deadlines 15
F Project Approach and Budget 15
G Local Subcontracting Approach/ Local Employment Approach 5 Total 100

A. Completeness of Response (Pass/Fail)
Responses to this RFP/SOQ must be complete. Responses that do not include the proposal content requirements identified within this RFP /SOQ and subsequent addenda and do not address each of the items listed below will be considered incomplete, be rated a Fail in the Evaluation Criteria and will receive no further consideration.

B. Understanding of the Work/Project (25 points)
Demonstrated understanding of the Project including Project needs, identification of potential issues and overall approach to complete the Long- Term Trash Load Reduction Plan.

C. Experience with Similar Work (25 points)
Experience of the firm(s) with similar projects, including local knowledge, expedited timelines, and working with regulatory agencies.

D. Quality and Availability of Staff (15 points)
Quality and availability/current workload of proposed staff . References will be taken into consideration.

E. Schedule and Ability to Meet Deadlines (15 points)
Ability to complete the required work in a timely manner such that the Updated Long-Term Trash Load Reduction Plan is submitted as indicated.

F. Project Approach and Budget (15 points)
8 City of San Pablo
Request for Proposals
NPDES C.10 Trash Load Reduction Compliance Plan

Demonstrated success in projects similar to this one . Costs presented are competitive.

G. Local Subcontracting Approach/ Local Employment Approach (5 points) A consultant’s successful use of the local subcontracting and local employment approach (Section D, Items 1a. and 1b.) or a documented good faith effort to succeed at using the City’s l ocal subcontracting and/or local employment approach.

4. Tentative Schedule
Below is a tentative schedule for the selection and procurement process. Dates are subject to change by City staff and/or unforeseen circumstances.

Item Date
RFP/SOQ Release Date March 23, 2023
Last day to submit any questions April 6, 2023, 4:00pm
Proposal/SOQ Proposal submittal Date April 20, 2023, 4:00pm Panel Review April 21-28, 2023
Consultant Interview Week of May 1st (if necessary)
Selection and negotiation period May 8-15, 2023
Contract to be awarded at City Council (if necessary) June 5, 2023

F. ATTACHMENTS

Exhibit 1 – City of San Pablo 2014 Long-Term Trash Load Reduction Plan Exhibit 2 – City of San Pablo Full Trash Capture and Trash Management Area Map Exhibit 3 – Section by Section Analysis of Trash Management Strategy Table Exhibit 4 – Sample Consultant Agreement

EXHIBIT 1

City of San Pablo
Trash Management Plan
2014-2022

Submitted to the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the San Francisco Bay Region February 1, 2014
in compliance with Provision C.10 of the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit City of San Pablo Trash Management Plan 2014-2022

Contents

1. Introduction by the Contra Costa Clean Water Program (CCCWP) ........................................ 1 A. Trash Sources, Pathways, and Loadings ........................................................................................... 1 B. Background for this Plan....................................................................................................... ............ 1 C. Framework for Long-Term Trash Management ............................................................................... 2 D. Identifying High-Trash Areas ........................................................................................................... 2 E. Trash Management Strategy ............................................................................................................. 3 F. Assessing Effectiveness .................................................................................................................... 3

2. City of San Pablo Trash Management Overview .................................................................... 4 A. Characteristics Affecting Trash Generation and Management ......................................................... 4 B. Drainage System and Water Resources Affected by Trash .............................................................. 4 C. Trash Problems and Priorities ........................................................................................................... 5

3. City of San Pablo Trash Management Strategy ...................................................................... 6 A. Delineation of Trash Management Areas ......................................................................................... 8 B. Area-Specific Control Measures, Implementation Schedules, and Effectiveness Assessment ...... 10 C. Creek and Shoreline Cleanups ........................................................................................................ 10 D. Trash Reduction Policies ...................................................................................................... .......... 10 E. Public Education, Outreach, and Community Involvement ............................................................ 11 F. Jurisdiction-wide Progress Assessment and Continuous Improvement .......................................... 13

4. Trash Management Area Plans ............................................................................................. 13 A. TMA-Specific Plans ........................................................................................................................ 13

5. References ............................................................................................................................ 13

Figures
1-1 Trash Sources and Transport Pathways
Tables
2-1 2010 Census Data
2-2 2005 Land Uses (ABAG)
2-3 Trash Generation Category Percentages by Land Use
3-1 Trash Generation Categories by Trash Management Area 3-2 Control Measures by Trash Management Area
3-3 Creek and Shoreline Hot Spot Cleanups
Attachment
City of San Pablo Trash Generation Map
City of San Pablo Trash Management Areas Map
City of San Pablo Full Trash Capture Map
City of San Pablo Trash Management Plan 2014-2022
1 1. Introduction by the Contra Costa Clean Water Program (CCCWP) Contra Costa municipalities have prepared Long-Term Trash Reduction Plans (Plans) in compliance with Provision C.10.c. of the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit 1 (MRP). Each municipal plan describes control measures and best management practices (BMPs) designed to attain a 70% trash load reduction by July 1, 2017 and a 100% reduction by July 1, 2022.

A. Trash Sources, Pathways, and Loadings
Figure 1 illustrates sources and pathways of trash that enters the region’s creeks and San Francisco Bay.

Trash has multiple sources—all of which are episodic and widely dispersed.

In Figure 1, Stormwater Conveyances is highlighted because only this pathway is subject to MRP trash- reduction requirements. In reality, the other pathwa ys are equally significant, depending on time and location. In practical terms, the pathways are inte rtwined. For example, on-land clean-ups reduce trash entering storm drains and also reduce wind-blown trash. When visible trash is reduced, litter and dumping from all sources tends to become less frequent and severe.

Figure 1. Trash sources and transport pathways.

Municipalities must balance their commitment to MR P compliance with their commitment to preserving and enhancing local environmental qua lity and quality of life for their residents. That is, municipalities seek to reduce trash on local streets and roads, and to reduce the total amount of trash in their creeks and on their shorelines—in addition to fulfilling the Wate r Board’s mandate to eliminate trash that flows through storm drains.

For these reasons, Contra Costa municipalities address tr ash holistically and comprehensively, integrating a variety of strategies, and uses a variety of methods to assess the success of those strategies.

B. Background for this Plan
MRP Provision C.10 requires the Permittees to reduce trash loads from their storm drains by 40% by 2014, 70% by 2017, and 100% by 2022.

1 Order R2-2009-0074, issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the San Francisco Bay Region, became effective on December 1, 2009 and applies to 76 cities, towns, counties, and flood control districts.

City of San Pablo Trash Management Plan 2014-2022
2 Provision C.10.a.ii. required each Permittee to determ ine a baseline trash load and a method for tracking reductions in trash loads. Working collectively thro ugh the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA)—and in close collaboration with Water Board staff—the Permittees developed methods, including a calculator, for tracking loads and load reductions.

The Permittees used these methods to develop Shor t-Term Trash Load Reduction Plans by February 1, 2012, and are implementing those plans through July 1, 2014 to achieve the 40% reduction. Progress has been documented in the Permittees’ 2012 and 2013 Annual Reports.

Following their review of the Short-Term Plans, Wa ter Board staff requested Permittees to change the methods used to evaluate trash load reductions . Working collectively through BASMAA—and again in close collaboration with Water Board staff—the Perm ittees developed the framewo rk and planning tools to be used in the Permittees Long-Term Plans.

C. Framework for Long-Term Trash Management
The following 8-step framework was developed2:

1. Identify high, medium, and low trash generation areas, based on land use and other geographic data, local knowledge, and field verification.

2. Attempt to identify sources in high and medium trash generation areas to assist in focusing control measures.

3. Prioritize areas and problems/types.

4. Identify options (tools) for dealing with prioritized areas/problems.

5. Define success/goals and measurement type.

6. Select and implement tools.

7. Evaluate success.

8. Modify as needed.

Steps 5 and 7 of this framework acknowledge funda mental challenges presented by Provision C.10—how to define and evaluate success.

D. Identifying High-Trash Areas
To implement the first step of the framework—t o identify high, medium, and low trash-generation areas—the Permittees collectively, through BASMAA, de veloped and calibrated a predictive model of trash generation.3 Model variables are designated land use and 2010 median household income; the model was calibrated based on trash collected in fu ll-trash-capture devices (BASMAA, 2012a, BASMAA, 2012b).

The Permittees applied the model as follows: The m odel was used to generate a preliminary map designating very high, high, moderate, and low trash generation areas. Local municipal staff reviewed the preliminary map and identified areas that had incorr ect designations based on local knowledge of actual land uses and of trash generation rates (CCCWP, 2013) . Specific methods used to verify local trash generation rates are documented in Section 2 below and may include queries of municipal staff or members of the public, reviews of municipal opera tions data, viewing areas using Google Maps and Street View, application of BASMAA’s On-Land Vi sual Trash Assessment Protocol (BASMAA, 2013), or other methods.

2 The framework was developed in a November 1, 2012 meeting at Water Board staff offices and was refined in subsequent meetings with Water Board staff.
3 “Generation” is understood to be the volume of trash potentially available to be transported from the urban watershed (per acre, per year) into the storm drains in the absence of any control measures and BMPs.

City of San Pablo Trash Management Plan 2014-2022
3 E. Trash Management Strategy
Municipalities delineated Trash Management Areas (T MAs) within their jurisdictions. TMA boundaries are based on land uses, drainage areas, management areas, and/or geographic considerations, and are drawn to facilitate focused and efficient efforts to re duce trash in areas with very high, high, and medium trash generation rates. The rationale for delineating TMAs in the specific municipality, an overview of the municipality’s trash management approach, and a description of activities that apply throughout the municipality (including hot spot cleanups, jurisdic tion-wide policies, and jurisdiction-wide public outreach) is in Section 3.

Section 4 consists of individual summary plans fo r each municipal TMA. Each TMA plan describes the key TMA characteristics, summarizes control me asures, and describes methods for evaluating effectiveness of efforts with in the TMA.

F. Assessing Effectiveness
Each TMA summary plan includes methods to evaluate effectiveness. As indicated in the framework, the primary purpose of these evaluations is to facilitate continuous improvement of control measures within the TMA. Continuous improvement requires TMA- specific interpretation of results, including consideration of factors that may have contributed to success, or lack of success, at that locale during the evaluation period. Evaluations of effectiveness a nd adjustments to the TMA summary plans will be included in each annual report.

A secondary purpose of the evaluation methods is to contribute evidence toward an annual general evaluation of progress toward MRP goals. Such an evaluation will be based on weight-of-evidence, using the results from TMA-level evaluations of the effec tiveness of specific actions within the TMA, and of the total of TMA-level actions, during the reporting period. A jurisdiction-wide assessment of progress will be compiled by combining this TMA-level eviden ce with the results of hot spot cleanups, visual assessments of creeks and shorelines, and observations by local residents and cleanup participants. As additional outcome-based assessment methods are de vised and pilot tested—regionally and statewide— information derived from these methods will be incorporated into annual progress assessments.

City of San Pablo Trash Management Plan 2014-2022
4 2. City of San Pablo Trash Management Overview
A. Characteristics Affecting Trash Generation and Management Demographic data from the 2010 census is presented in Table 2-1. However, the median household income is from the 2000 census which is the most recent data available.

Table 2-1. 2010 Census Data
Population 29,139
Under 18 28.3%
18-24 11.1%
25-44 30.0%
45-64 21.8%
65 and older 8.8%
Median household income $37,184
Table 2-2 summarizes land uses within San Pablo.

Table 2-2. 2005 Land Uses (ABAG)
Land Use Category Jurisdictional Area % of Jurisdictional Area Commercial and Services 119.1 7.6%
Industrial 40.0 2.6%
Residential 997.3 63.9%
Retail 133.4 8.5%
K-12 Schools 80.2 5.1%
Urban Parks 23.1 1.5%
Other 166.7 10.7%

The City of San Pablo is 2.5 square miles in size. The City is built out and densely populated. A majority of the City’s land use is residential (63.9%) with a large amount of multi-family properties. Fifty-three percent of the residents are renters and there is a hi gh turnover in rental properties. With a median household income of $37,184, many of the City’s residents are considered low income.

The 2012 BASMAA trash generation ra te study concluded that low income areas typically have more trash. It also found that trash generation rates are linke d to land use. San Pablo participated in the study by contributing one data point. The majority of the land use in the City is residential which the study found is not a high trash generating land use. However, the income variable plays a more significant role in San Pablo resulting in a high amount of trash for the City overall even in residential areas.

B. Drainage System and Water Resources Affected by Trash The City is fortunate to have 3 creeks running thro ugh its boundaries: Wildcat, San Pablo, and Rheem Creeks. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks are predom inately owned by private property owners whose properties extend to the midline of the creek, with a fe w sections of City-owned parcels located mostly in parks. Both creeks are day lighted except a few short stretches under I-80 and San Pablo Avenue. Rheem Creek is mainly a concrete flood control channel maintained by the Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District.

The City has taken many actions to protect the creek s from trash, erosion, and pollution since the creeks are vital to the local flora and fauna. The City h as restored multiple sections of creek and recently day lighted a long stretch of creek under the Davis Park b aseball field. The City has a close relationship with the local creek group (SPAWNERS) and The Watershed Project, who periodically do cleanups, plantings, City of San Pablo Trash Management Plan 2014-2022
5 and general maintenance of the restored sites since the City does not have adequate staffing to keep up with the weeds at the restoration sites.

For 20 years, the City has done a tremendous amount to remove trash from the creeks:
 City crews have obtained applicable state permits and permission to enter private property to clean the creeks once a year before the rainy season. It takes 4 maintenance workers one month to complete the work. This activity has been effect ive in removing trash that was either illegally dumped in the creek, washed from upstream, or comi ng from the outfalls. It also has the dual benefit of reducing flooding.
 The City hosts an annual creek cleanup at Davis Park on Wildcat Creek. The cleanup is preceded by in class presentations at the local schools about cr eeks and how trash travels. See Section 3E for more detail.
 The City installed a camera at one location that w as a major dumping area. It reduced the amount of trash at that location but other areas saw an increase. The City has not found that reviewing pictures as a means of convicting individuals involved in illegal dumping activities is not an effective mechanism for deterring illegal dumping. Not only is it time consuming to review all the pictures (camera is triggered by any moving objects including cats) but also, unless the person’s face and license plate are clearly visible, the information cannot be used for a conviction. Since other jurisdictions have had success with cameras, we may consider it in the future but for now, we are trying other methods as outlined in Section 3.
 Windblown trash is a major problem in a few stretc hes of creek. On San Pablo Creek at Kennedy Plaza, the City installed a tall metal fence to block some of the trash that blows over from the nearby shopping center. The fence has also reduced the nu mber of homeless in that stretch of the creek.

However, the chain linked fences installed in othe r locations, were cut by the homeless or residents who use creeks to get around town.
 The City spends a lot of time cleaning homeless camp s in the creeks and vacant lots. In an average year, City crews cleanup 10 homeless camps and it typically takes 4 employees one full day per camp. These efforts are in response to resident calls and complaints. Unfortunately, although there is a shelter nearby, most of the displaced homeless move to other locations in the creek or return.

C. Trash Problems and Priorities
The modeling used to develop the Trash Generation Ma ps captured the generation rates accurately for the most part. However, staff made some refinements by reviewing the maps with the Maintenance and Park Facilities Manager, reviewing data on trash collected from City-owned trash cans, viewing Google Maps, and conducting numerous visual observations using BASMAA’s On-Land Visual Assessment Protocol.

Some residential areas were changed to high trash, a few businesses were changed to very high, and a few multi-family complexes were changed to low trash since they have an effective home owner’s association.

As shown in Table 2-3 below, reta il establishments were by far the land use category with the highest trash generation category and therefore the City will prioritize control measures to addressing those areas first. However, residential areas also have a lo t of high trash generation rates and will be the second priority.

City of San Pablo Trash Management Plan 2014-2022
6 Table 2-3 summarizes trash generation by land use:

Table 2-3. Trash Generation Category by Land Use
Trash
Generation
Category
Jurisdictional
Area (Acres)
Commercial
and
Services
Industrial Residential Retail K-12
Schools
Urban
Parks
Other
Very High 72.5 0.1% 1.8% 2.1% 92.3% 0.0% 3.3% 0.3%
High 480.4 1.6% 4.9% 66.4% 12.8% 9.4% 0.0% 5.0%
Medium 682.3 16.2% 2.2% 69.9% 0.7% 5.2% 2.9% 2.9%
Low 324.6 0.3% 0.0% 61.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 37.7%

3. City of San Pablo Trash Management Strategy
The following trash management strategy is designed to attain a 70% trash load reduction by July 1, 2017 and a 100% reduction by July 1, 2022. The strategy may be updated and revised in response to changing conditions, including the amounts and location of trash generation, effectiveness of management actions, and available resources. Updates will be documented in Annual Reports.

Pre-MRP:

In the past, the City has focused more on municipal actions to address trash including:
 Street sweeping 2 times a month for residential str eets and 4 times a month for commercial streets.

Ninety percent of the City has No Parking signs and a Code Enforcement Officer writes violators $60 tickets.
 Annual and as needed catch basin cleaning.
 Bi-weekly maintenance of the 65 public trash cans in streets and parks.  Daily illegal dumping pick-ups.
 Bi-annual dumpster days where residents bring their garbage to a central location.  Annual $40 dump voucher program available for each household.  Public education and outreach (See Section 3E).

Actions to Attain 40% Trash Load Reduction:
 Low Impact Development (LID) facilities have been effective at trapping trash in landscaped areas on private property. There have been 7 LID projects in San Pablo (4 before the MRP and 3 since the MRP was adopted. As part of Fiscal Year 2013/14 Annual Report, the City will submit a map with the LID facilities and their associated treatment areas.  Since the MRP was adopted, the City installed 71 fu ll and 16 partial capture treatment devices. The devices require maintenance three times a year. Th e full capture treatment devices include 70 United Stormwater Connector Pipe Screens (CPS) and 1 Revel Environmental Manufacturing (REM) device.

The partial capture treatment devices are the United Stormwater Automatic Retractable Screens (ARS). Ten of the ARS units were installed in conjunction with the CPS units to allow the street sweeping to pick up the trash in some areas with a lot of trash and to prevent flooding by reducing the amount of trash in the full capture treatment devi ces. In total, these devices capture the trash from 593 acres in the City (roughly 1/3 of the total City acreage). City crews have cleaned the treatment devices 3 times since they were installed. So far, the average device was 1/2 full and contained at least 50% trash and sediment and 50% vegetation. It appears that the frequency of clean outs is sufficient but we will continue to monitor the devices.

City of San Pablo Trash Management Plan 2014-2022
7  In 2012, the City negotiated a new contract with the solid waste service provider and included bulky item pick-up service for all single family residential customers. This action will likely reduce some of the illegal dumping in the City.
 In 2013, the City Council established an Adopt-a-S pot program to get the community involved in beautifying the City. Although a major goal of the program was to develop on land cleanups, the majority of the groups interested in the program have chosen other projects. Therefore, the City is not including the program in this plan.

Strategy to Attain 70% and 100% Trash Load Reduction:

The City has spent significant amount of effort and resources to address litter abatement. However, in order to comply with the 70-100% trash load reduction provisions of the MRP, the City is broadening its strategy for addressing trash by focusing on the s ources. The sources can be separated into three categories: business (includes retail, commercial, and i ndustrial), residential, and non-jurisdictional. The urban parks category which also generates some trash will be addressed by performing more on land cleanups.

Sources
a. Businesses
The business trash generators include the large shoppi ng centers, restaurants, industrial, commercial, and multi-family residential properties. The control me asures the City is planning to implement include targeting the business property owners/managers and their customers.  Business Property Owner/Manager:

The City plans on including the high and very high trash generating businesses and multi-family properties to the list of businesses currently inspected by the Public Works Department as part of the NPDES program (such as restaurants and auto facili ties). The City’s business inspection program focus has been trash receptacles behind businesses but will now be broadened to also include the parking lot and landscaping where a lot of the litter accumulates.

Since most of the shopping centers or multi-family properties have property management companies handling their maintenance, in 2015 the City plans on establishing a contact list and then meeting with the responsible individual to review the City’s stormwater ordinance related to best management practices for private properties. The goal of these meetings will be to discuss a plan for the business to improve their trash management. Annually thereafter, a percentage of the properties will be inspected to ensure compliance. Since San Pablo is a small city, staff will also respond to trash complaints from the public and other City staff. After the outreach to th e high and very high trash generating businesses is completed, the City will begin the same process for the medium trash generating businesses.

In 2014, the City will update its stormwater ordinance. At that time, staff will review the litter provisions of the stormwater ordinance to make sure they sufficien tly address properties that generate a lot of trash.

Properties in violation of the litter provision of the stormwater ordinance, will receive a notice to abate letter. If the violation is not corrected in the time frame provided in the letter, the business will be issued a fine. Environmental Program staff is trained in issuing notice to abate letters and citations.  Customers:

Littering is a major problem in San Pablo so in additi on to working with the busi nesses, the City plans to also address the customers responsible for the litteri ng. The Police Department enforces the CA Penal Code 374.4, 23111, and 23112 for litteri ng but it is usually difficult to catch a person in the act while in a vehicle. Our stormwater ordinance also includes language that prohibits littering, however, it has not been used as an enforcement tool in the past. In 2 016, staff will evaluate whether the state or local code City of San Pablo Trash Management Plan 2014-2022
8 will be more effective in reducing the incidences of littering. Since pedestrian littering is more visible, the Police Department plans to also focus their efforts in that area a few times a year and report on the number of citations issued annually.

b. Residential
The residential category trash genera tors include overflowing trash cans, pilfering of recycling cans, and littering.
 Overflowing Trash:

The City is a member of RecycleMore which is a Jo int Powers Authority that represents all West County jurisdictions to meet th e state mandated solid waste diversion goa ls. In 2013, RecycleMore and member agencies negotiated a new contract with the soli d waste service provider. Currently, organics and recycling cans are collected every other week. Theref ore, the trash cans are always full or overflowing.

The contractor agreed to collect all three cans (trash, recycling, and organics) weekly starting in late 2014.

Environmental Program staff will conduct a waste audit in a few typical high trash generating residential neighborhood for two weeks before the weekly collecti on program is implemented to establish a baseline.

In 2015, Environmental Program staff will once agai n conduct a waste audit to evaluate whether there have been improvements in overflowing trash cans afte r the weekly collection has been implemented for a few months.
 Pilfering:

Due to the close proximity to West County’s recycling facility, a lot of people pilfer through the recycling cans on solid waste collection days. Unfortunately, th eir actions result in a lot of litter falling into the street. The police department brought forward an or dinance to address this issue a few years ago but the City Council at the time decided not to act since they felt it was criminalizing the low income population.

Since this is a big source of trash in residential neighborhoods, the City plans to revisit this potential control measure in the future.
 Littering:

Pedestrian littering is a major problem in San Pabl o since a lot of people walk. The same approach described above for customers of businesses will be impl emented in residential areas. We hope that by giving out a few citations, word will spread and pe ople will stop littering. In addition, since students walking home from school contribute to the littering problem, the 2 resource officers (police officers stationed at the middle school and elementary school s) will work with the students to change their behavior through education or by requiring that they pick up their trash.

c. Non-jurisdictional
Interstate 80 (I-80) contributes a substantial amount of windblown trash to the adjacent properties. Also, with 5 elementary schools, a middle school, and a high school and a private school right on the border, a lot of litter enters the City streets from sources the City does not have jurisdiction over. The Contra Costa Clean Water Program will coordinate meetings with Caltrans to work on a mutually acceptable plan to reduce trash along the I-80 corridor in 2015. The cities in West Contra Costa Unified School District also plan to meet with the District to work on a plan to reduce trash in schools as well as in the vicinity of schools in 2015.

A. Delineation of Trash Management Areas
Unlike the majority of cities where the high trash gene ration locations are usually located in the heart of the commercial district, in San Pablo, those areas are scattered throughout the City. This provided a challenge in delineating trash management areas (TMA s). The City’s initial goal was to try and group similar categories (i.e. high and very high) together. The next goal was to number the TMAs in order of City of San Pablo Trash Management Plan 2014-2022
9 priority. The next goal was to group them geographica lly by land use and to have each area contiguous.

The next goal was to make the TMAs as big as possibl e since San Pablo is a small city and managing too many TMAs would be challenging. In the end, the C ity was divided into 14 TMAs. However, a few of the TMAs that are geographically apart, have similar trash sources and generation rates and therefore will have the same control measures.

Table 3-1. Trash Generation Category by Trash Management Area TMA Jurisdictional
Area (Acres)
Trash Generation Rate
Very High High Medium Low
TMA 1 297.9 17.9% 45.6% 35.5% 1.0%
TMA 2 232.7 6.6% 81.5% 10.1% 1.9%
TMA 3 108.5 2.0% 81.3% 16.4% 0.3%
TMA 4 27.6 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TMA 5 18.1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TMA 6 7.8 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TMA 7 12.1 0.0% 90.1% 9.9% 0.0%
TMA 8 39.1 0.0% 0.0% 73.1% 26.9%
TMA 9 82.7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
TMA 10 55.2 1.2% 0.0% 88.8% 9.9%
TMA 11 265.3 0.3% 0.5% 96.0% 3.2%
TMA 12 60.3 0.0% 0.0% 95.3% 4.7%
TMA 13 104.7 0.0% 0.0% 46.6% 53.4%
TMA 14 247.8 0.0% 0.4% 5.2% 94.4%

Table 3-2 summarizes the control measures proposed for each TMA. The bulky item and weekly collection are a jurisdiction-wide measure that will be implemented at the same time for all TMAs with residential land use. It is not included as a contro l measure in TMA 14 because staff will not focus the effectiveness evaluation in that ar ea. Finally, although the trash reduc tion policies will be implemented jurisdiction-wide, they are only listed as a control measure for TMA 14 since Water Board staff have indicated that municipalities can only get credit for these polices for low trash generating areas.

Based on the trash generation rate and the amount of area already treated by the full capture treatment devices, the implementation priority in order will be TMA 1, 3, 5, 6, 2, 7, 4, 10, 8, 12, 13, 9, and finally

14. Staff will provide an implementation schedule table with the next Annual Report.

Table 3-2. Control Measures by Trash Management Area
TMA Capture
Treatment
Device
Anti-littering Enforcement Improved Solid
Waste Service
On land
Clean
up
Trash Reduction
Policies
Full Partial Littering Business
Program
Pilfering Bulky
Item
Pick up
Weekly
Pick up
Plastic Poly-
styrene
TMA 1 X X X X
TMA 2 X X X X X X
TMA 3 X X X X
TMA 4 X X X
City of San Pablo Trash Management Plan 2014-2022
10 TMA 5 X X X
TMA 6 X X X X X
TMA 7 X X
TMA 8 X X X X
TMA 9 X X X X
TMA 10 X X X X X X
TMA 11 X X X X X X X
TMA 12 X X X X X
TMA 13 X X X X X
TMA 14 X X X

B. Area-Specific Control Measures, Implementation Schedules, and Effectiveness Assessment Long-Term Trash Reduction Plans for each Trash Ma nagement Area, including control measures, detailed implementation plans, and methods of assessi ng the effectiveness of control measures are in Section 4.

C. Creek and Shoreline Cleanups
Table 3-3. Creek Cleanups
Location Description Cleanup Frequency
Pre-MRP 12/2009 to
7/2014
7/2014
to
7/2017
After
7/2017
Davis Park Hot Spot Location on Wildcat Creek from
the foot bridge to the field.
0 Annually Annually Annually

The City has four years of trash assessment data at th e hot spot location. The number of items collected has typically stayed constant except for one year where there was a spik e. The number of items collected is not a good indicator for evaluating program success since many factors may have an effect (i.e. a volunteer group cleaned the area without the City’s knowledge or a Styrofoam plate may be broken down into a hundred pieces). Also, measuring cubic yards can also be misleading because most of the trash is small, but the presence of one large illegally dumpe d object in one year (i.e. shopping cart), can significantly impact the results.

What is evident from the assessment, is that the pre dominant trash category is plastic packaging. Also, the sources of the trash for this particular location is littering from park users and some years there were illegally dumped items. Not much of the trash is coming from the outfall which may indicate that the City’s street sweeping and catchbasin cleaning efforts are effective. Another benefit of the hot spot assessments is that the City intends to use these numbers to see if there are reductions in specific products the City bans.

Other creek cleanup efforts are summarized in Section 2B.

D. Trash Reduction Policies
As reported in the City’s Short Term Trash Plan, th e City planned on prohibiting single-use plastic bags and polystyrene food ware.

Single-Use Plastic Bag Ordinance:

City of San Pablo Trash Management Plan 2014-2022
11 ReycleMore at the request of a few member agencies hired a consultant to prepare the California Environmental Quality Act documents for the single-u se plastic bag ordinance. The agency decided to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to protect the municipalities from litigation since there were a lot of comments submitted by the Save the Pl astic Bag Coalition. Once the EIR was completed, the cities of Richmond, El Cerrito, and San Pablo met to coordinate the timing of the ordinance adoption and outreach efforts. The model ordinance was routed to the various City departments, a public hearing was advertised and held, staff presented the ordinan ce to various organizations, and the ordinance was unanimously passed by the City Council in the fall of 2013. Staff sent out postcards, sent out a press release, held a workshop for businesses, visited businesses, and put up bus shelters posters.

Environmental Program staff is responsible for im plementing and enforcing the single-use carryout bag ordinance. Staff met with the City Attorney abou t enforcement. Unlike stormwater discharges that cannot be abated and are levied an automatic citatio n (the City changed the Municipal Code to include this action a few years ago), the single-use plastic bag ordinance violation can be abated and therefore will need to follow the Municipal Code Section relate d to abatement. However, since this ordinance requires an action the businesses have direct control over, the City Attorney agrees that they can have as little as 24 hours to comply with the ordinance. Other Municipal Code violations typically require a 30 day notice. If the violation is not corrected in th e time frame provided in the letter, the business will be issued a citation.

The ordinance has been in place since January of 2014 and staff plans on evaluating its’ success based on the number of enforcement actions taken against the non-compliant businesses (or the percentage of compliant businesses) and by evaluating the hot spot location data. Enforcement will begin in July of 2014. Staff plans on responding to complaints from the residents and by conducting surprise inspections.

In the first two weeks of the ordinance being enacted, staff already received a call from a resident reporting a non-compliant business.

Polystyrene Ordinance:

The City plans on working on the polystyrene ban in 2014 for an implementation date of January 2015.

In addition to just polystyrene food ware, staff is proposing that the sale of all polystyrene in the City also be banned. The ordinance would be similar to the one adopted by the City of Richmond. Enforcement for this action will include checking compliance as pa rt of our NPDES restaurant inspections and also inspecting the few stores that sell polystyrene. Staff will evaluate the effectiveness of the program by the number of enforcement actions taken against the non- compliant business (or the percentage of compliant businesses) and by evaluating the hot spot location data.

E. Public Education, Outreach, and Community Involvement Regional Efforts
Through the CCCWP, the Permittees conducted a “Litter Travels, But It Can Stop with You” multi-year campaign beginning in FY 2009-2010. The multi-me dia campaign was designed to educate Contra Costa’s citizens about the impacts of trash and litter in the County’s waterways and how they can help address this problem and included TV spots, billboard s, posters at BART stations, placards on transit buses, print ads and updates to the CCCWP website. Other outreach included more than 10,000 letters to County residents, contact with youth sports leagues, outreach to the 17 school districts in the County, and distribution of flyers to students in 5 of those districts. Pre and post-campaign surveys were conducted.

Through the CCCWP, Permittees also support the work of the California Product Stewardship Council (CPSC) and the Green Business Program. Both of these organizations address trash through source reduction and waste management. CPSC's mission is to promote Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), which is based upon shifting California's product waste management system from one focused on City of San Pablo Trash Management Plan 2014-2022
12 government funded and ratepayer financed waste diversion to one that relies on producer responsibility in order to reduce public costs and drive improvements in product design that promote environmental sustainability. The CPSC's position is that the producers should have the primary responsibility to establish, fund, and manage end of life systems for their products. CPSC has advocated for EPR legislation affecting a wide-range of products including pharmaceuticals, batteries, paint, sharps, and mattresses.

The Green Business Program, of which CCCWP is the largest contributing Partner in Contra Costa County, is designed to publicly recognize private businesses and public agencies that take extra steps, beyond baseline compliance with environmental regulations, to prevent pollution and save resources (e.g., conserve water and energy, reduce waste through reuse and recycling, prevent stormwater pollution through good housekeeping practices, etc.). To date, 530 businesses have been certified as Green Businesses in Contra Costa County. Currently, 334 businesses are certified including a large number of auto repair shops, landscapers, waste haulers, printers, grocery and hardware stores, solar panel installers, and home remodelers. Numerous public agencies have also been certified. Municipal stormwater and POTW inspectors assist the Green Business program by encouraging potential Green Business candidates. CCCWP staff serves on the Green Business Program's "Partners Committee" and actively engages in development of the Green Business checklist (i.e., the stormwater pollution prevention section that each business needs to complete before becoming certified as a green business). Some of the more relevant actions that businesses have undertaken to become certified or recertified that also reduce trash loads include the following: commit to reduce waste in a minimum of five ways, maintain parking areas free of litter, keep dumpsters covered when not in use, ensure tarps for covering loads are in good condition and used correctly, and purchase a minimum of three recycled-content products.

To address trash from illegal dumping, the CCCWP operates a 1-800-No-Dumping hotline. The hotline is used by both businesses and the public to report potentially illegal dumping activities. All hotline calls are referred to the appropriate municipality for follow-up and, if necessary, enforcement. Calls have been logged since FY 2004-2005. Calls to the hotline are combined with calls that come directly to municipalities and Contra Costa County Hazardous Materials (Hazmat) Division and are tracked and documented annually in the municipal annual reports.

The CCCWP will continue to identify new partners and areas of outreach for source reduction and measures to reduce trash in the environment. CCCWP is currently in contact with California Department of Transportation (Office of Stormwater Program Development) and hopes to identify trash load reduction projects in Contras Costa County that would be financially and strategically feasible for all involved parties. CCCWP has also made contact with the California Highway Patrol, Contra Costa County Solid Waste Authority, and a number of transfer stations to potentially develop additional outreach materials to reduce litter from uncovered loads.

Local Efforts
Due to the high turnover in renters, educational outreach has proven to be challenging. However, the City of San Pablo has always believed in the importance of public education and outreach in changing behavior. The City had been conducting many pub lic education and outreach programs throughout the years:
 Tile Art Project - community groups paint tiles that were installed on trash cans and placed throughout the City and parks.
 Riparian Lab after School Program – The Watershe d Project was contracted to conduct a series of presentations about litter, creeks, and pollution prevention to youth from 4 th grade to high school.

City of San Pablo Trash Management Plan 2014-2022
13  Annual Wildcat Creek Cleanup – Kids for the Bay is contracted to conduct in class presentations about the watershed and how litter travels followed by a creek cleanup event.  Community Cleanup Program – The Watershed Project is contracted to conduct in class presentations about litter followed by a school cleanup event.
 Staff regularly submits articles in the City’s news letter and the City Manager’s e-news on litter, litter reduction, cleanup events, and City services for trash disposal.

As part of this plan, the City intends on conduc ting public education and out reach campaigns before implementing the littering control measures proposed in this plan similar to the extensive outreach done for the single-use plastic bag ordinance.

F. Jurisdiction-wide Progress Assessment and Continuous Improvement In considering appropriate control measures, staff me t with other agencies with similar trash generation rates and staff from all applicable City department s. Once the proposed cont rol measures were agreed upon, staff received approval from the Chief of Police and the City Manager. However, since the new expanded approach is the first of its kind for the City, Environmental Program staff will monitor and evaluate all the control measures as they are implemente d to see if they are effective in reducing trash. If not, the City will collaborate with other cities with similar trash generation rates and demographic to learn about their success and come up with alternative strate gies. The approach we are proposing is heavily dependent on enforcement which the City’s Environmental Program staff has experience in and believe it will has positive outcomes for the City. The difference with this plan compared to current practices is that some of the enforcement (residential littering) will be handled by the Police Department due to safely concerns.

As referenced in Section 1F, the control measure evaluations will help with the annual overall evaluation of our trash plan in attaining the MRP goals. Other information including the hot spot location data and annual on-land visual assessments will be used to evaluate progress.

4. Trash Management Area Plans
A. TMA-Specific Plans
TMA-specific plans for 14 areas are attached.

5. References
BASMAA 2012a. Bay Area Stormwater Management Agen cies Association. Trash Generation Rates for San Francisco Bay Area MS4s (Draft Final). Pr esentation to the BASMAA Trash Committee, August 2012. Prepared by EOA, Inc.

BASMAA 2012b. Baseline Trash Generation Rates, Preliminary Calibration of Modeled Results, Presentation to BASMAA Trash Committee, September, 2012. Prepared by EOA, Inc.

BASMAA 2013a. Visual On-Land Trash Assessment Prot ocol for Stormwater, Version 1.0 (Draft). April 30, 2013. Prepared by EOA, Inc.

CCCWP, 2013. Contra Costa Clean Water Program. Long-Term Trash Load Reduction Plan Development—Trash Generation Map Refinements. Technical Memorandum, May 20, 2013. Prepared by EOA, Inc.

TMA 1 is important because it consists of the only two entrances into the City from I-80 via San Pablo Dam Road and El Portal Drive. Both of these streets as well as San Pablo Avenue and Church Lane are arterial streets passing through the City.

Along San Pablo Avenue, there are a few shopping cente rs with large grocery stores and restaurants (predominately fast food restaurants) that generate a lot of trash. Additionally, there are multiple bus stops which contribute to pedestrian-generated litter. In addition, th e Casino, hospital, City Hall, and numerous health care facilities are within this TMA resulting in a lot of vehicular traffic. Adjacent to I-80, a substantial amount of wind and vehicular-generated litter enters the City. Please see S ection 3 of the plan for the control measure to address non-jurisdictional trash. There are a few multi-family and single-family residential areas as well.

Since the main streets are swept four times a month a nd there are both City-owned and AC Transit-owned trash cans, the majority of trash is found in the landscaping or inside the parking lots of private properties. On San Pablo Dam Road, a fair amount of the trash is blown by the wind into the street from I-80 and the two shopping centers.

Summary of Control Measures and Implementation Schedule for Trash Management Area 1 Control Measure Control Measure Details
Pre-
MRP
12/2009
to 7/2014
7/2014 to
7/2017
After
7/2017
Full Capture Treatment
Devices
- Connector pipe screens and one REM device (installed
2012).
- 2 LID projects (installed 2009 and 2011)
X X
Partial-Capture
Treatment Devices
Automatic retractable screens (installed 2012). X
Anti-littering
Enforcement
- Pedestrian and vehicular littering violations (anticipated 2016)
- Business and multi-family property owner trash
violations (anticipated 2015)
X X

The full capture treatment devices capture a fair amount of TMA 1 since they were strategically located in the trashiest locations. However, a few very high and high trash generating areas are not treated by the full capture treatment devices and will therefore be the priority for this TMA. Please see Section 3 of the plan for more detail on all three of the control measures.

Evaluation of Program Effectiveness for Trash Management Area 1 Control Measure Evaluation Method Evaluation Method Details Key Characteristics of Trash Management Area 1
Total
Jurisdictional
Area (Acres)
Percent in Trash Generation Category
Dominant Land Uses
Dominant Types and
Sources of Trash
Very
High High Medium Low
297.9 17.9% 45.6% 35.5% 1.0% Retail and Commercial Retail stores and pedestrian and vehicular-generated litter

TRASH MANAGEMENT AREA
1 City of San Pablo Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan
Full and Partial
Capture
Document Maintenance
- Track frequency of clean outs, the amount of trash removed, the percent of debris removed.
- For LID, inspect facilities per MRP to ensure they are properly maintained.

Anti-littering
Enforcement
Document Enforcement Track the number of enforcement cases and actions taken by the property owners to reduce litter.

Although TMA 2 is predominately residential, it has two arterial roads (Rumrill Blvd and 23 rd Street) with a lot of businesses. TMA 2 also include two elementary schools.

Due to its proximity to businesses, busy arterial roads, and the schools, this area is mostly a high trash generating area. In addition, pilfering and inadequate solid waste service result in high trash even in residential streets away from the other sources.

Summary of Control Measures and Implementation Schedule for Trash Management Area 2 Control Measure Control Measure Details
Pre-
MRP
12/2009
to 7/2014
7/2014 to
7/2017
After
7/2017
Full Capture Treatment
Devices Connector pipe screens (installed 2012). X
Partial-Capture
Treatment Devices
Automatic retractable screens (installed 2012). X
Anti-littering
Enforcement
- Pedestrian and vehicular littering violations (anticipated 2016)
- Pilfering enforcement (anticipated 2018)
X X
Improved Solid Waste
Service
- Bulky item collection (2013)
- Weekly solid waste collection (late 2014)

X X

TMA 2 has very few drain inlets. Therefore, the full a nd partial capture treatment devices installed in this area treat the majority of this TMA. However, the City proposes to still implement the anti-littering enforcement but after the other TMAs with high trash and areas not treated by full capture treatment devices.

Evaluation of Program Effectiveness for Trash Management Area 2 Control Measure Evaluation Method Evaluation Method Details Full and Partial
Capture
Document Maintenance Track frequency of clean outs, the amount of trash removed, the percent of debris removed.

Anti-littering
Enforcement
Document Enforcement
Track the number of enforcement cases.

Improved Solid - Document participation - Track participation in the bulky item program.

Key Characteristics of Trash Management Area 2
Total
Jurisdictional
Area (Acres)
Percent in Trash Generation Category
Dominant Land Uses
Dominant Types and
Sources of Trash
Very
High High Medium Low
232.7 6.6% 81.5% 10.1% 1.9% Residential Pedestrian-generated litter

TRASH MANAGEMENT AREA
2 City of San Pablo Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan
Waste Service - Waste Audit - Evaluate conditions before and after weekly solid waste collection program.

TMA 3 includes the second half of San Pablo Avenue. Road 20 is also a busy collector street used to get to Rumrill Blvd. In addition, this TMA includes a section with subsidized housing.

Along San Pablo Avenue, there are a few shopping cente rs with large grocery stores and restaurants (predominately fast food restaurants) that generate a lot of trash. Additionally, there are multiple bus stops which contribute to pedestrian-generated litte r. Since the main streets are swep t four times a month and there are both City-owned and AC Transit-owned trash cans, the majority of trash is found in the landscaping or inside the parking lots of private properties.

Summary of Control Measures and Implementation Schedule for Trash Management Area 3 Control Measure Control Measure Details
Pre-
MRP
12/2009
to 7/2014
7/2014 to
7/2017
After
7/2017
Full Capture Treatment
Devices
- Connector pipe screens (installed 2012).
- 3 LID projects (installed 2009, 2011, and 2011)
X X
Partial-Capture
Treatment Devices
Automatic retractable screens (installed 2012). X
Anti-littering
Enforcement
- Pedestrian and vehicular littering violations (anticipated 2016)
- Business and multi-family property owner trash
violations (anticipated 2015)
X X

The full capture treatment devices capture a fair amount of TMA 3 since they were strategically located in the trashiest locations. However, a few very high and high trash generating areas are not treated by the full capture treatment devices and will therefore be the priority for this TMA. Please see Section 3 of the plan for more detail on all three of the control measures.

Evaluation of Program Effectiveness for Trash Management Area 3 Control Measure Evaluation Method Evaluation Method Details Full and Partial
Capture
Document Maintenance
- Track frequency of clean outs, the amount of trash removed, the percent of debris removed.
- For LID, inspect facilities per MRP to ensure they are properly maintained.

Anti-littering
Enforcement
Document Enforcement Track the number of enforcement cases and actions taken by the property owners to reduce litter.

Key Characteristics of Trash Management Area 3
Total
Jurisdictional
Area (Acres)
Percent in Trash Generation Category
Dominant Land Uses
Dominant Types and
Sources of Trash
Very
High High Medium Low
108.5 2.0% 81.3% 16.4% 0.3% Retail and Residential Retail and Pedestrian and Vehicular-generated litter

TRASH MANAGEMENT AREA
3 City of San Pablo Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan
The majority of the land use in TMA 4 is urban open adjacent to I-80. There are two parcels of retail that primarily include a supermarket and restaurants. San Pablo Dam Road which is an arterial street runs through TMA 4.

Unlike San Pablo Avenue in TMA 1 and 3, San Pablo Dam road is not used by pedestrians often. Due to its proximity to I-80, it is used for commuters and shoppers. Both shopping centers are heavily used.

Summary of Control Measures and Implementation Schedule for Trash Management Area 4 Control Measure Control Measure Details
Pre-
MRP
12/2009
to 7/2014
7/2014 to
7/2017
After
7/2017
Full Capture Treatment
Devices - Connector pipe screens (installed 2012). X
Anti-littering
Enforcement
- Pedestrian and vehicular littering violations (anticipated 2016)
- Business and multi-family property owner trash
violations (anticipated 2015)
X X

The majority of the trash in TMA 4 is blown by the wi nd into the urban open parcels and street from I-80.

Unfortunately the one full capture treatment device th at was installed, treats a small portion of the TMA and therefore anti-littering enforcement and coordination with Ca l Trans will be critical. Please see Section 3 of the plan for more detail on all of the control measures.

Evaluation of Program Effectiveness for Trash Management Area 4 Control Measure Evaluation Method Evaluation Method Details Full Capture Document Maintenance Track frequency of clean outs, the amount of trash removed, the percent of debris removed.

Anti-littering
Enforcement Document Enforcement Track the number of enforcement cases and actions taken by the property owners to reduce litter.

Key Characteristics of Trash Management Area 4
Total
Jurisdictional
Area (Acres)
Percent in Trash Generation Category
Dominant Land Uses
Dominant Types and
Sources of Trash
Very
High High Medium Low

27.6 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Urban Open and Retail Wind Blown and Vehicular- generated litter

TRASH MANAGEMENT AREA
4 City of San Pablo Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan
TMA 5 is the City’s largest industrial park on Giant Road which is an arterial street next to the railroad tracks. Rheem Creek passes through the TMA.

Summary of Control Measures and Implementation Schedule for Trash Management Area 5 Control Measure Control Measure Details
Pre-
MRP
12/2009
to 7/2014
7/2014 to
7/2017
After
7/2017
Full Capture Treatment
Devices - Connector pipe screens (installed 2012). X
Anti-littering
Enforcement
- Vehicular littering violations (anticipated 2016)
- Business trash violations (anticipated 2015)
X X

The two full capture treatment devices capture a portio n of the trash in TMA 5 but the remaining areas will require working with the businesses in the industrial park. Also, a lot of vehicles use Giant Road to travel from I- 580 to Richmond and San Pablo neighborhoo ds. Since Giant Road is on the le ss visible side of town, vehicular litter may be a large source.

Evaluation of Program Effectiveness for Trash Management Area 5 Control Measure Evaluation Method Evaluation Method Details Full Capture Document Maintenance Track frequency of clean outs, the amount of trash removed, the percent of debris removed.

Anti-littering
Enforcement Document Enforcement Track the number of enforcement cases and actions taken by the property owners to reduce litter.

Key Characteristics of Trash Management Area 5
Total
Jurisdictional
Area (Acres)
Percent in Trash Generation Category
Dominant Land Uses
Dominant Types and
Sources of Trash
Very
High High Medium Low

18.1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Industrial Industrial Businesses and Vehicular-generated litter.

TRASH MANAGEMENT AREA
5 City of San Pablo Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan
TMA 6 is the entrance to a predominately medium trash generating single-family neighborhood in TMA 11 from San Pablo Av enue. However, this small TMA is categorized as high trash predominately due to trash generated from the multi-family properties.

Though some of the sources of trash in this small TM A can be from vehicular-gener ated litter since a lot of people take this road to get home, the main source is the trash from the multi-family properties.

Summary of Control Measures and Implementation Schedule for Trash Management Area 6 Control Measure Control Measure Details
Pre-
MRP
12/2009
to 7/2014
7/2014 to
7/2017
After
7/2017
Anti-littering
Enforcement
- Vehicular littering violations (anticipated 2016)
- Multi-family property owner trash violations (anticipated 2015)
- Pilfering enforcement (anticipated 2018)
X X
Improved Solid Waste
Service
- Bulky item collection (2013)
- Weekly solid waste collection (late 2014)

X X

Evaluation of Program Effectiveness for Trash Management Area 6 Control Measure Evaluation Method Evaluation Method Details Anti-littering
Enforcement
Document Enforcement
Track the number of enforcement cases.

Improved Solid
Waste Service
- Document participation
- Waste Audit
- Track participation in the bulky item program.
- Evaluate conditions before and after weekly solid waste collection program.

Key Characteristics of Trash Management Area 6
Total
Jurisdictional
Area (Acres)
Percent in Trash Generation Category
Dominant Land Uses
Dominant Types and
Sources of Trash
Very
High High Medium Low

7.8 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Residential Multi-family Property litter

TRASH MANAGEMENT AREA
6 City of San Pablo Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan
TMA 7 is an elementary school. The reason it is its own TMA is because it is surrounded by a low generating residential area (TMA 14).

Unlike other schools that are surrounded by high genera ting neighborhoods, this school is surrounded by low generating residential area. Just a few parcels next to the entrance of the school ar e medium trash generators which is probably a result of trash generated from the sc hool (trash from the parent’s car at pick-up or students littering in front of school while waiting to be picked up).

Summary of Control Measures and Implementation Schedule for Trash Management Area 7 Control Measure Control Measure Details
Pre-
MRP
12/2009
to 7/2014
7/2014 to
7/2017
After
7/2017
Full Capture Treatment
Devices Connector pipe screens (installed 2012). X
Anti-littering
Enforcement
Pedestrian and vehicular littering violations (anticipated 2016)
X

Unfortunately, the one full trash capture treatment devi ce in TMA 7 treats the low trash generating area of TMA

14. The City will enforce littering violations but the main control measure will be to work with the school district since this is a non-jurisdictional area. Please see Secti on 3 of the plan for more detail on all of the control measures.

Evaluation of Program Effectiveness for Trash Management Area 7 Control Measure Evaluation Method Evaluation Method Details Full Capture Document Maintenance Track frequency of clean outs, the amount of trash removed, the percent of debris removed.

Anti-littering
Enforcement
Document Enforcement
Track the number of enforcement cases.

Key Characteristics of Trash Management Area 7
Total
Jurisdictional
Area (Acres)
Percent in Trash Generation Category
Dominant Land Uses
Dominant Types and
Sources of Trash
Very
High High Medium Low

12.1 0.0% 90.1% 9.9% 0.0% K-12 School Pedestrian-generated litter

TRASH MANAGEMENT AREA
7 City of San Pablo Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan
TMA 8 consisted primarily of single family r esidential parcels with an arterial street (Church Lane) going through it. It also includes a church with its own school, the sporting fields of a private school (the main school offices are in the City of Richmond), and a privately owned subdivision.

The private school is well maintained. Because of church activities, school, sporting events, and inadequate solid waste service, the area is mostly medium trash generating.

Summary of Control Measures and Implementation Schedule for Trash Management Area 8 Control Measure Control Measure Details
Pre-
MRP
12/2009
to 7/2014
7/2014 to
7/2017
After
7/2017
Anti-littering
Enforcement
- Pedestrian and vehicular littering violations (anticipated 2016)
- Pilfering enforcement (anticipated 2018)
X X
Improved Solid Waste
Service
- Bulky item collection (2013)
- Weekly solid waste collection (late 2014)

X X

Evaluation of Program Effectiveness for Trash Management Area 8 Control Measure Evaluation Method Evaluation Method Details Anti-littering
Enforcement
Document Enforcement
Track the number of enforcement cases.

Improved Solid
Waste Service
- Document participation
- Waste Audit
- Track participation in the bulky item program.
- Evaluate conditions before and after weekly solid waste collection program.

Key Characteristics of Trash Management Area 8
Total
Jurisdictional
Area (Acres)
Percent in Trash Generation Category
Dominant Land Uses
Dominant Types and
Sources of Trash
Very
High High Medium Low

39.1 0.0% 0.0% 73.1% 26.9% Residential and K-12 School Pedestrian or vehicular- generated litter

TRASH MANAGEMENT AREA
8 City of San Pablo Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan
TMA 9 consists primarily of single family residential homes on the south side of the City in between Rumrill Blvd and 23rd Street.

The main sources of trash in TMA 9 are from pedestrian and vehicle littering and inadequate solid waster service.

Summary of Control Measures and Implementation Schedule for Trash Management Area 9 Control Measure Control Measure Details
Pre-
MRP
12/2009
to 7/2014
7/2014 to
7/2017
After
7/2017
Anti-littering
Enforcement
- Pedestrian and vehicular littering violations (anticipated 2016)
- Pilfering enforcement (anticipated 2018)
X X
Improved Solid Waste
Service
- Bulky item collection (2013)
- Weekly solid waste collection (late 2014)

X X

Although there is no full capture treatment device in this TM A, since there are very few drain inlets in the south part of the city, all the trash drains to the full capture treatment devices in TMA 2. However, the City proposes to still implement the anti-littering enforcement but after the other TMAs with high trash generating areas have been addressed.

Evaluation of Program Effectiveness for Trash Management Area 9 Control Measure Evaluation Method Evaluation Method Details Anti-littering
Enforcement
Document Enforcement
Track the number of enforcement cases.

Improved Solid
Waste Service
- Document participation
- Waste Audit
- Track participation in the bulky item program.
- Evaluate conditions before and after weekly solid waste collection program.

Key Characteristics of Trash Management Area 9
Total
Jurisdictional
Area (Acres)
Percent in Trash Generation Category
Dominant Land Uses
Dominant Types and
Sources of Trash
Very
High High Medium Low

82.7 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% Residential Pedestrian and Vehicular- generated litter

TRASH MANAGEMENT AREA
9 City of San Pablo Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan
TMA 10 includes the City’s largest park (Dav is Park) which is also the City’s hot spot location.

TMA 10 is primarily residential and medium trash generati ng. There is one business just north of Wildcat Creek that is a high trash generator.

Summary of Control Measures and Implementation Schedule for Trash Management Area 10 Control Measure Control Measure Details
Pre-
MRP
12/2009
to 7/2014
7/2014 to
7/2017
After
7/2017
On-land Trash Cleanups Davis Park cleaned monthly by volunteers. X Anti-littering
Enforcement
- Pedestrian and vehicular littering violations (anticipated 2016)
- Business and multi-family property owner trash
violations (anticipated 2015)
- Pilfering enforcement (anticipated 2018)
X X
Improved Solid Waste
Service
- Bulky item collection (2013)
- Weekly solid waste collection (late 2014)

X X

The park has trash cans and is cleaned weekly. However, due to its high usage, there is always some trash present. Staff proposes increasing on-land cleanups with the help of volunteers.

Evaluation of Program Effectiveness for Trash Management Area 10 Control Measure Evaluation Method Evaluation Method Details On-land Trash
Cleanups
Document Maintenance Track frequency and volume of materials cleaned up. Track volunteer hours.

Anti-littering
Enforcement
Document Enforcement
Track the number of enforcement cases.

Improved Solid
Waste Service
- Document participation
- Waste Audit
- Track participation in the bulky item program.
- Evaluate conditions before and after weekly solid waste collection program. [
Key Characteristics of Trash Management Area 10
Total
Jurisdictional
Area (Acres)
Percent in Trash Generation Category
Dominant Land Uses
Dominant Types and
Sources of Trash
Very
High High Medium Low

55.2 1.2% 0.0% 88.8% 9.9% Residential and Urban Park Pedestrian and Vehicular- generated litter

TRASH MANAGEMENT AREA
10 City of San Pablo Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan
TMA 11 has Rumrill Blvd (an arterial street) going through it and is bordered on the west by Giant Road (also an arterial street). There is one school and a few businesses in this TMA.

Although the majority of this TMA is in the medium trash generating category, there are a few high and very high businesses which will be addressed first.

Summary of Control Measures and Implementation Schedule for Trash Management Area 11 Control Measure Control Measure Details
Pre-
MRP
12/2009
to 7/2014
7/2014 to
7/2017
After
7/2017
Full Capture Treatment
Devices Connector pipe screens (installed 2012). X
Partial-Capture
Treatment Devices
Automatic retractable screens (installed 2012). X
Anti-littering
Enforcement
- Pedestrian and vehicular littering violations (anticipated 2016)
- Business trash violations (anticipated 2015)
- Pilfering enforcement (anticipated 2018)
X X
Improved Solid Waste
Service
- Bulky item collection (2013)
- Weekly solid waste collection (late 2014)

X X

Evaluation of Program Effectiveness for Trash Management Area 11 Control Measure Evaluation Method Evaluation Method Details Full and Partial
Capture
Document Maintenance Track frequency of clean outs, the amount of trash removed, the percent of debris removed.

Anti-littering
Enforcement
Document Enforcement
Track the number of enforcement cases.

Improved Solid
Waste Service
- Document participation
- Waste Audit
- Track participation in the bulky item program.
- Evaluate conditions before and after weekly solid waste collection program.

Key Characteristics of Trash Management Area 11
Total
Jurisdictional
Area (Acres)
Percent in Trash Generation Category
Dominant Land Uses
Dominant Types and
Sources of Trash
Very
High High Medium Low
265.3 0.3% 0.5% 96.0% 3.2% Residential Pedestrian and Vehicular- generated litter

TRASH MANAGEMENT AREA
11 City of San Pablo Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan
Amador Street is the main street in TMA 12.

TMA 12 is primarily residential but also includes one elem entary school. Amador Street is used by the entire neighborhood to get to the freeway.

Summary of Control Measures and Implementation Schedule for Trash Management Area 12 Control Measure Control Measure Details
Pre-
MRP
12/2009
to 7/2014
7/2014 to
7/2017
After
7/2017
Full Capture Treatment
Devices Connector pipe screens (installed 2012). X
Anti-littering
Enforcement
- Pedestrian and vehicular littering violations (anticipated 2016)
- Pilfering enforcement (anticipated 2018)
X X
Improved Solid Waste
Service
- Bulky item collection (2013)
- Weekly solid waste collection (late 2014)

X X

Evaluation of Program Effectiveness for Trash Management Area 12 Control Measure Evaluation Method Evaluation Method Details Full and Partial
Capture
Document Maintenance Track frequency of clean outs, the amount of trash removed, the percent of debris removed.

Anti-littering
Enforcement
Document Enforcement
Track the number of enforcement cases.

Improved Solid
Waste Service
- Document participation
- Waste Audit
- Track participation in the bulky item program.
- Evaluate conditions before and after weekly solid waste collection program.

Key Characteristics of Trash Management Area 12
Total
Jurisdictional
Area (Acres)
Percent in Trash Generation Category
Dominant Land Uses
Dominant Types and
Sources of Trash
Very
High High Medium Low

60.3 0.0% 0.0% 95.3% 4.7% Residential Pedestrian and Vehicular- generated litter

TRASH MANAGEMENT AREA
12 City of San Pablo Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan
San Pablo Dam Road (an arterial road) cuts through TMA 13.

The majority of TMA 13 is urban open land use with some business and residential areas.

Summary of Control Measures and Implementation Schedule for Trash Management Area 13 Control Measure Control Measure Details
Pre-
MRP
12/2009
to 7/2014
7/2014 to
7/2017
After
7/2017
Anti-littering
Enforcement
- Vehicular littering violations (anticipated 2016)
- Business and multi-family property owner trash
violations (anticipated 2015)
- Pilfering enforcement (anticipated 2018)
X X
Improved Solid Waste
Service
- Bulky item collection (2013)
- Weekly solid waste collection (late 2014)

X X

The majority of the trash in TMA 13 is blown by the wind into the urban open parcels and street from I-80. Staff plans on coordinating with Cal Trans but also working w ith the businesses. Please see Section 3 of the plan for more detail on all of the control measures.

Evaluation of Program Effectiveness for Trash Management Area 13 Control Measure Evaluation Method Evaluation Method Details Anti-littering
Enforcement
Document Enforcement
Track the number of enforcement cases.

Improved Solid
Waste Service
- Document participation
- Waste Audit
- Track participation in the bulky item program.
- Evaluate conditions before and after weekly solid waste collection program.

Key Characteristics of Trash Management Area 13
Total
Jurisdictional
Area (Acres)
Percent in Trash Generation Category
Dominant Land Uses
Dominant Types and
Sources of Trash
Very
High High Medium Low
104.7 0.0% 0.0% 46.6% 53.4% Urban Open Wind Blown and Vehicular- generated litter

TRASH MANAGEMENT AREA
13 City of San Pablo Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan
TMA 14 is the only TMA that is not contiguous in area and that is because this is the low trash generating areas of the City. The TMA includes a cemetery, a residential neighborhood, and two subdivisions with active Home Owners’ Associations.

In delineating TMA 14, a small amount of high and medium trash generating areas were accidentally included.

Those areas will be treated with the same control measure s as TMA 1 since they are adjacent to that TMA. The maps will be updated and submitted with the next Annual Report.

Summary of Control Measures and Implementation Schedule for Trash Management Area 14 Control Measure Control Measure Details
Pre-
MRP
12/2009
to 7/2014
7/2014 to
7/2017
After
7/2017
Full Capture Treatment
Devices - 2 LID projects (installed in 2008 and 2008) X Trash Reduction
Policies
- Single-Use Plastic Bag Ordinance (implemented 2014)
- Polystyrene Ban Ordinance (anticipated 2015)
X X

The main reason TMA 14 has low trash generation is pre dominately due the municipal efforts prior to the MRP adoption detailed in Section 3. Also, a large portion of TMA 14 includes a cemetery (which has LID facilities) and the two subdivisions (one has LID facilities) ar e gated and well maintained by the Home Owners’ Association. The trash reduction policies in addition to the City’s existing efforts, will hopefully maintain these areas as low trash generating.

Evaluation of Program Effectiveness for Trash Management Area 14 Control Measure Evaluation Method Evaluation Method Details Full Capture Document Maintenance Inspect LID facilities per MRP to ensure they are properly maintained.

Trash Reduction
Policies
Document Enforcement
and Review Hot-Spot
Assessment
- Track the number of enforcement cases.
- The number of plastic bags and Styrofoam found at the hot-spot location pre and post the ordinance adoption will be compared.

Key Characteristics of Trash Management Area 14
Total
Jurisdictional
Area (Acres)
Percent in Trash Generation Category
Dominant Land Uses
Dominant Types and
Sources of Trash
Very
High High Medium Low
247.8 0.0% 0.4% 5.2% 94.4% Residential and Urban Open Pedestrian-generated litter

TRASH MANAGEMENT AREA
14 City of San Pablo Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan

EXHIBIT 2

Non-Jurisdictional
(Dot color = Generation Category)
Trash Generation
Category
Legend
Low
Medium
High
Very High
Full-Capture Location")
k
!
j Creek/Shoreline Hotspot
Full Trash Capture
Streets
Agency Boundary
Creeks
Parcel Boundary
k
!
j
SPB-01
80 San P
ablo
Ave
Giant R
d
23Rd
St
Hilltop Dr
Rheem Ave
20 20Th S
t
Pine Ave
Richmon
d Pky
Dover Ave
Shane
Dr
21St St
11Th St
Moyers
Rd
Lowell Ave
Market Ave
Groom Dr
19 Th St
Vale R
d
Andrade Ave
Blume Dr
Am
ador
St
Stanton Ave
Emeric Ave
17Th St
Maricopa Ave
Miner Ave
Brookside Dr
Ch
urch Ln
Jo Ann Dr
Mcbryde Ave
Dunn Ave 29
Th St
Humphrey Ave
Costa Ave
Hillcres
t Rd
Sutter Ave
Rivers St
14Th St
Rollingwood Dr
28T
h
St
Tulare Ave
San Pablo Dam Rd
12Th
St
34T
h
St
Hellings Ave
Sanford Ave
13Th
St
32 Nd St
Bo
nita
Rd
California Ave
Broadway
Av
e
Coalinga Ave
18T
h
St
15Th S
t
El Port
al Dr
Rumril
l Blvd
Wiswall Dr
Ridge Rd
Lake St
Maso
n St
Hillview
Dr
Arlington Blvd
Alpine Rd
22Nd St
Bush Ave
Robert H Miller D
r
Collins Ave
John Ave
Brook Way
Espanola Dr
24T
h St
Tyler
St
Gilma DrRobert Mille
r Dr
Palmer Ave
Bar
na
rd St
Birm
ing
ham Dr
Hilltop Mall Rd
25Th
St
Griffin Dr
Park Ave
Hayes St
Oxfor
d Ave
Moran Ave
Barkley
Dr
Parker Rd
26Th
St
Auto Plz
Powell St Van N
ess S
t
Arund
el Way
Manor
Dr
36Th
St
Wi
lar
t Dr
Wilcox Ave
Lancaste
r Dr
Devon Way
Yuba
St
Visalia Ave
Kern St
Morton Ave
Che
vy W
ay
Ford
ha
m
St
Mckenzie Dr
De
l C
amino Dr
Alfreda Blvd
Williams Dr
Stone St
Gr
eenw
oo
d Dr
Lassen S
t
Lakesid
e Dr
Kelley Av
e
Bayo Vista Ave
Alt
a Mir
a Dr
Ven
tur
a St
Garrity Way
Verdi
Duke A
ve
Loyola
Ave
Son
oma S
t
Colett
e Dr
Vil
la Dr
Morrow Dr
10 Th St
Avon Ln
Mari
n A
ve
Folsom Ave
Jenkins Way
Stoneg
len

Mission Ave
Pu
llman S
t
M
anc
hest
er Av
e
Parr Blvd
Mission Bell
Dr
Highgate Dr
M
ontere
y Ave
Ma
car
thu
r Av
e
Bowhill Ln
Gonzaga
Ave
O Brien Rd
Trenton
Blvd
Miflin Ave
Erla Way
Gateview Cir
Fairmede Dr
Bernhard Ave
Mc
laughlin St
Glenn Ave
Clar
e St
Glen
lock
St
Beau Riv
age
Kirk Ln
Mullens Dr
Yuba Ave
Johnson Dr
Canter
bury
Dr
Merri
tt Av
e
Fillmore St
Willo
w Rd
Bradford Dr
Henderson Dr
Standar
d A
ve
Grovev
iew Dr
Annapolis
Ave
16Th St
Rose Arbor
Ave
Acapulco Dr
Lovegro
ve Ave
Gomer Dr
Mcg
loth
en Way
Harrison Dr
Banc
roft
Ln
Rumril Blvd
Belf
as
t Wa
y
Douglas St
Pablo Vista Ave
Montoya Ave
Howa
rd St
Ven
tura A
ve
Benjamin Dr
Nor
thr
idge Dr
Colin St
Rals
ton A
ve
Glyni
s Dr
Gerald
Ave
Joel Ct
Giant
Hwy
Klose Way
Morag
a Rd
Con
tra
Costa
Ave
Manzan
illa Dr
Research Dr
Ohare
Av
e
Cr
uce
ro
Ave
Overlook Way
Wyman St
Rumrill Rd
Hu
ll Dr
Carlfield Rd
Treeside Way
Casin
o Ave
Bolduc Ct
Aberde
en Way
Marel
ia Ct
Iol
a Av
e
Post Ave
Evens Ave
Braga L
n
Riverside Ave
Phillips C
t
Bayview Ave
Hum
bo
ldt
St
Cam
pus Dr
Rid
gewo
od
Way
Valen
cia Wa
y
Longview Dr
Regina Ave
Victoria Ct
Hum
bold
t Av
e
Leke Way
Stonington Ave
Mesa Buena Ave
Chesley Ave
Un
ive
rsity
Ave
Harb
or
View
A
ve
Parkvi
ew Te
r
Connecticut Ave
27Th
St
Ever
green Ter
Baywood Ln
Clement Ave
Sunl
eaf W
ay
Chattl
eto
n Ln
Barbara Ln
Madrone Way
Mulford Way
La
rchmont
Ln
Col
lege
Ln
Barth Ave
Sheff
ield
Ct
Juarez
Ct
Wes
t C
t
Jean Ct
Homestead Cir
Shasta Ave
Westgate Cir
Las M
orad
as Cir
Morning Su
n Dr
Alan Ct
Ca
rdiff Ct
Austin Ct
Ca
stro
St
Alpi
ne C
t
Eas
t C
t
Alva
ra
do S
q
Bake
r St
Dods
on St
Frieda Ct
Shirley Ave
Randy Ln
Westview P
l
Brooksid
e Ave
Regello Ct
Kat
hlee A
ve
Southridg
e D
r
Ju
dith
C
t
Natalie Ct
Drake W
ay
Miflin Ct
Don Way
Parkgate
Ct
Mur
ra
Ct
Ce
da
r Ter
Brookh
aven
Ct
Bouquet Ave
Wildcat Canyon Pky
Maria Vega
Ct
Cuth
be
rtso
n Ct
Short Ave
Wanlass Ave
Castro R
d
Du
ke Path
Glasgow Ct
Broadwalk Pl
Cherrywoo
d C
t
Groveview Ct
Leeds Ct
Carlton Ct
Hidal
go Ct
La Puer
ta Rd
Muir Ave
Bristol Ct
Cla
rend
on Ct
Redwood Cir
Hannon Dr
Pine
wood
Te
r
Chaparral
Ct
Manzani
lla Ct
Ce
nter
Ct
Pointview Ln
Cam
po Verde
Cir
Marque
tte C
t
W
iswa
ll Ct
Grand Canyon Ave
Oakwood Ct
Espano
la Ct
Dim
m W
ay
20T
h St
Visalia Ave
Yu
ba
Ave
Ar
lington Bl
vd
El P
ort
al Dr
26Th St
Willo
w Rd
Riverside Ave
16Th St
Rumrill B
lvd
18Th
St
17Th
St
Shasta Ave
14Th S
t
24Th
St
19Th St
15Th St
Rob
ert Miller Dr
Rumrill Blvd
Merritt A
ve
Rumril Blvd
21St
St
18 Th St
Post Ave
17Th S
t
Lake St
80 Casi
no Ave
19Th St
Broa
dway
Av
e
20 15Th St
17Th St
Blume Dr
Bush Ave
20Th St
Rumrill Blvd
22N
d St
16T
h St
Mcbryde Ave
Rivers St
21St
St
Ric
hmond Pky
Bush Ave
22Nd St
Glenn Ave
Sanford Ave
13Th St
Robert H Miller Dr
18 Th St
Rumril
l Blvd
19T
h
St
Mar
in A
ve
Rheem
Cree
k
Wildcat Creek
San Pabl
o Creek
Garrity Cre
ek
Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, O rdnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
±
00 . 2 0 . 40.1 Miles
Data Sources:

Roads: Tele Atlas
City Boundaries: Contra Costa County
Background: ESRI World Topographic Map
Map Created By:

EOA, Inc.

Date:

December 6th, 2013
City of San Pablo Trash Generation Map
Non-Jurisdictional
(Dot color = Generation Category)
Trash Generation
Category
Legend
Low
Medium
High
Very High
k
!
j Creek/Shoreline Hotspot Streets
Agency Boundary
Creeks
Parcel Boundary
Non-Jurisdictional
(Dot color = Generation Category)
Trash Generation
Category
Legend
Low
Medium
High
Very High
Full-Capture Location")
k
!
j Creek/Shoreline Hotspot
Full Trash Capture
Streets
Agency Boundary
Creeks
Parcel Boundary
Non-Jurisdictional
(Dot color = Generation Category)
Trash Generation
Category
Legend
Low
Medium
High
Very High
k
!
j Creek/Shoreline Hotspot
Trash Management Area
Streets
Agency Boundary
Creeks
Parcel Boundary
k
!
j
SPB-01
2 1
11 3
9 14
13 8
14 12
10 14
4 5
7 6
4 80

San P
abl
o Ave
Giant R
d
23Rd
St
Hilltop Dr
Rheem Ave
20 20
Th S
t
Pine Ave
Richmond Pky
Dover Ave
Sh
ane Dr
21 St St
11Th St
Moyers
Rd
Lowell Ave
Market Ave
Groom Dr
19Th S
t
Vale Rd
Andrade Ave
Blume D
r
Amad
or
St
Stanton
Ave
Emeric Ave
17Th
St
Maricopa Ave
Miner Ave
Brookside Dr
Churc
h Ln
Jo Ann Dr
Mcbryde Ave
Dunn Ave 29
Th St
Humphrey Ave
Costa Ave
Hillcrest Rd
Sutter Ave
Rivers St
14Th St
Rollingwood Dr
28T
h
St
Tulare Ave
San Pablo Da
m Rd
12T
h
St
34Th StHellings Ave
Sanford Ave
13Th
St
32 Nd St
Bo
nita
Rd
California Ave
Broadway Ave
Coalinga Ave
18Th
St
15Th S
t
El
Portal Dr
Rumrill
Blvd
Wiswall Dr
Ridge Rd
Lake St
Maso
n St
Hillview Dr
Arlington Blvd
Alpin
e Rd
22Nd St
Bush Ave
Robert H Miller Dr
Collins Ave
John Ave
Brook Way
Espano
la D
r
24T
h St
Tyler
St
Gilma DrRobert
Miller Dr
Palmer Ave
Barnard
St
Birm
ingham D
r
Hilltop Mall Rd
25Th
St
Griffin Dr
Park Ave
Hayes St
Oxford Ave
Moran Ave
Ba
rkley Dr
Parker Rd
26Th S
t
Auto Plz
Powell St Va
n N
ess S
t
Arun
del Wa
y
36Th
St
Wi
lar
t D
r
Wilcox Ave
Lancaster
Dr
Devon
Wa
y
Yuba
St
Visalia Ave
Kern St
Morton Ave
Chevy W
ay
Ford
ha
m
St
Mckenzie Dr
De
l C
amin
o Dr
Alfreda Blvd
Williams Dr
Stone St
Gr
eenw
oo
d Dr
Lass
en S
t
Lakesid
e Dr
Kelley A
ve
Bayo
Vista Ave
Alt
a Mira Dr
Ven
tura St
Garrity Way
Verdi
Duke Ave
Loyola Ave
Sonoma
St
Colette D
r
Vil
la Dr
Morrow
Dr
10 Th St
Avon Ln
Mari
n Ave
Folsom Ave
Jenkins Way
Stoneg
len

Mission Ave
Pullma
n S
t
Ma
nc
hes
ter Ave
Parr Blvd
Mission Bell
Dr
Highgate Dr
M
onterey Ave
Ma
carthur A
ve
Bowhill Ln
Gonzag
a Ave
O Brien Rd
Trenton Blvd
Miflin Ave
Er
la Way
Gateview Cir
Fairmede Dr
Bernhard Ave
Mc
laughlin St
Glenn Ave
Clar
e St
Glenlock St
Beau R
ivage
Kirk Ln
Mullens Dr
Yuba
Ave
Johnson Dr
Cante
rbury D
r
Mer
ritt Av
e
Fillmore St
Willo
w Rd
Bradford Dr
Henderson Dr
Standard Ave
Groveview
Dr
Annap
olis Ave
16Th St
Rose Arbor Av
e
Acapulco Dr
Lovegrove Ave
Gomer Dr
Mcg
lothe
n Way
Harrison Dr
Banc
roft
Ln
Rumril Blvd
Belfast Way
Doug
las St
Pablo Vista Ave
Montoya Ave
Howard St
Ven
tura A
ve
Benjamin Dr
Northr
idge Dr
Colin St
Ralst
on Ave
Glynis Dr
Gerald
Ave
Joel Ct
Gian
t Hwy
Klose Way
Morag
a Rd
Con
tra
Costa
Ave
Manzan
illa Dr
Research Dr
Ohare
Ave
Cru
cero Ave
Overlook Way
Wyman St
Rumrill Rd
Hull Dr
Carlfield Rd
Treeside Wa
y
Casino A
ve
Bolduc Ct
Aberdeen
Way
Iola Ave
Post Ave
Evens A
ve
Bra
ga Ln
Riverside Ave
Ba
rranca Ave
Phillips
Ct
Bayview Ave
Hum
bo
ldt St
Camp
us
Dr
Rid
gewo
od
W
ay
Vale
ncia Way
Longview Dr
Regina Ave
Victoria Ct
Hum
bold
t Av
e
Leke Way
Stonington Ave
Mesa Buena Av
e
Chesley Ave
Universi
ty Av
e
Harbor
View A
ve
Parkview Ter
Connecticut Ave
27Th
St
Ev
ergree
n Ter
Bay
wood Ln
Clement Ave
Sun
leaf
W
ay
Chat
tleton Ln
Barbara Ln
Madrone Way
Mulford Way
College
Ln
Barth Ave
Shef
field
Ct
Juarez
Ct
Wes
t C
t
Jean Ct
Homestea
d Cir
Shasta Ave
Westgate Cir
Las Morada
s Cir
Morning
Sun Dr
Alan Ct
Cardi
ff Ct
Austin Ct
Castro
St
Alpi
ne C
t
Eas
t Ct
Alva
ra
do S
q
Baker St
Dod
son St
Frie
da Ct
Shir
ley Ave
Randy Ln
Westv
iew Pl
Br
ookside A
ve
Regello Ct
Kathl
ee A
ve
Southridg
e D
r
Ju
dith
C
t
Natalie Ct
Drake W
ay
Miflin Ct
Don Way
Parkgate Ct
Mur
ra
Ct
Ce
dar Te
r
Br
oo
khav
en Ct
Bouquet Ave
Wildcat C
anyon P
ky
Maria
Veg
a Ct
Cuth
be
rtso
n Ct
Short Ave
Wanlass Ave
Castro R
d
Du
ke Pat
h
Glasgow Ct
Broadwalk Pl
Che
rrywood C
t
Groveview C
t
Leeds Ct
Carlto
n Ct
Hidal
go Ct
La Puerta Rd
Muir Ave
Bris
tol Ct
Claren
don Ct
Redwood Cir
Hann
on Dr
Chaparral
Ct
Man
zan
illa Ct
Cen
ter
Ct
Point
view Ln
Ca
mp
o Ve
rde Ci
r
Marque
tte
Ct
W
iswall Ct
Grand Canyon Ave
Oakwood Ct
Dim
m W
ay
14Th S
t
Richm
ond
Pky
20T
h St
Merri
tt A
ve
21St St
20 Riverside Ave
16T
h St
Broa
dway A
ve
18Th
St
Robert Mi
ller D
r
Shas
ta A
ve
16Th St
Glenn Ave
19Th S
t
15Th St 24Th
St
Rumrill Blvd
Yuba
Ave
Rumr
ill Blvd
Robert H Miller
Dr
17Th St
Post Ave
80 Lake St
17Th S
t
19Th St
22Nd S
t
Ma
rin Av
e
15Th St
18 Th St
Blume D
r
17T
h
St
20Th
St
Ru
mrill Blvd
Ar
lington
Bl
vd
Will
ow Rd
Mcbryde Ave
Rivers St
21St
St
El P
ort
al Dr
Bush Ave
22N
d St
Sanford Ave
13Th
St
Bush Ave
18Th
St
Rumrill Blv
d
26Th St
19T
h
St
Visalia Ave
Rumril Blvd
Rheem C
reek
Wildcat Creek
San P
ablo C
reek
Garrity C
ree
k
Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, O rdnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
±
00 . 2 0 . 40.1 Miles
Data Sources:

Roads: Tele Atlas
City Boundaries: Contra Costa County
Background: ESRI World Topographic Map
Map Created By:

EOA, Inc.

Date:

December 6th, 2013
City of San Pablo Trash Management Areas Map
Non-Jurisdictional
(Dot color = Generation Category)
Trash Generation
Category
Legend
Low
Medium
High
Very High
k
!
j Creek/Shoreline Hotspot
Trash Management Area
Streets
Agency Boundary
Creeks
Parcel Boundary
Non-Jurisdictional
(Dot color = Generation Category)
Trash Generation
Category
Legend
Low
Medium
High
Very High
Full-Capture Location")
k
!
j Creek/Shoreline Hotspot
Full Trash Capture
Streets
Agency Boundary
Creeks
Parcel Boundary
k
!
j
SPB-01
80 San P
abl
o Ave
Giant R
d
23Rd
St
Hilltop Dr
Rheem Ave
20 20
Th S
t
Pine Ave
Richmond Pky
Dover Ave
Sh
ane Dr
21 St St
11Th St
Moyers
Rd
Lowell Ave
Market Ave
Groom Dr
19Th S
t
Vale Rd
Andrade Ave
Blume D
r
Amad
or
St
Stanton
Ave
Emeric Ave
17Th
St
Maricopa Ave
Miner Ave
Brookside Dr
Churc
h Ln
Jo Ann Dr
Mcbryde Ave
Dunn Ave 29
Th St
Humphrey Ave
Costa Ave
Hillcrest Rd
Sutter Ave
Rivers St
14Th St
Rollingwood Dr
28T
h
St
Tulare Ave
San Pab
lo Dam Rd
12T
h
St
34Th StHellings Ave
Sanford Ave
13Th
St
32 Nd St
Bo
nita
Rd
California Ave
Broadway Ave
Coalinga Ave
18Th
St
15Th S
t
El
Portal Dr
Rumrill
Blvd
Wiswall Dr
Ridge Rd
Lake St
Maso
n St
Hillview Dr
Arlington Blvd
Alpin
e Rd
22Nd St
Bush Ave
Robert H Miller Dr
Collins Ave
John Ave
Brook Way
Espano
la D
r
24T
h St
Tyler
St
Gilma DrRobert
Miller Dr
Palmer Ave
Barnard
St
Birm
ingham D
r
Hilltop Mall Rd
25Th
St
Griffin Dr
Park Ave
Hayes St
Oxford Ave
Moran Ave
Ba
rkley Dr
Parker Rd
26Th S
t
Auto Plz
Powell St Va
n N
ess S
t
Arun
del Wa
y
Manor Dr
36Th
St
Wi
lar
t D
r
Wilcox Ave
Lancaster
Dr
Devon
Wa
y
Yuba
St
Visalia Ave
Kern St
Morton Ave
Chevy W
ay
Ford
ha
m
St
Mckenzie Dr
De
l C
amin
o Dr
Alfreda Blvd
Williams Dr
Stone St
Gr
eenw
oo
d Dr
Lass
en S
t
Lakesid
e Dr
Kelley Av
e
Bayo
Vista Ave
Alt
a Mira Dr
Ven
tura St
Garrity Way
Verdi
Duke Ave
Loyola Ave
Sonoma
St
Colette D
r
Vil
la Dr
Morrow
Dr
10 Th St
Avon Ln
Mari
n Ave
Folsom Ave
Jenkins Way
Stoneg
len

Mission Ave
Pullma
n S
t
Ma
nc
hes
ter Ave
Parr Blvd
Mission Bell
Dr
Highgate Dr
M
onterey Ave
Ma
car
thu
r Av
e
Bowhill Ln
Gonzag
a Ave
O Brien Rd
Trenton Blvd
Miflin Ave
Er
la Way
Gateview Cir
Fairmede Dr
Bernhard Ave
Mc
laughlin St
Glenn Ave
Clar
e St
Glenlock St
Beau R
ivage
Kirk Ln
Mullens Dr
Yuba
Ave
Johnson Dr
Cante
rbury D
r
Mer
ritt Av
e
Fillmore St
Willo
w Rd
Bradford Dr
Henderson Dr
Standard Ave
Groveview
Dr
Annap
olis Ave
16Th St
Rose Arbor Av
e
Acapulco Dr
Lovegrove Ave
Gomer Dr
Mcg
lothe
n Way
Harrison Dr
Banc
roft
Ln
Rumril Blvd
Belfast Way
Doug
las St
Pablo Vista Ave
Montoya Ave
Howard St
Ven
tura A
ve
Benjamin Dr
Northr
idge Dr
Colin St
Ralst
on Ave
Glynis Dr
Gerald
Ave
Joel Ct
Gian
t Hwy
Klose Way
Morag
a Rd
Con
tra
Costa
Ave
Manzan
illa Dr
Research Dr
Ohar
e Av
e
Cru
cero Ave
Overlook Way
Wyman St
Rumrill Rd
Hull Dr
Carlfield Rd
Treeside Wa
y
Casino Av
e
Bolduc Ct
Aberdeen
Way
Marel
ia Ct
Iola Ave
Post Ave
Evens A
ve
Bra
ga Ln
Riverside Ave
Phillips
Ct
Bayview Ave
Hum
bo
ldt St
Camp
us
Dr
Rid
gewo
od
W
ay
Vale
ncia Way
Longview Dr
Regina Ave
Victoria Ct
Hum
bold
t Av
e
Leke Way
Stonington Ave
Mesa Buena Av
e
Chesley Ave
Universi
ty Av
e
Harbor
View A
ve
Parkview Ter
Connecticut Ave
27Th
St
Evergreen Ter
Bay
wood Ln
Clement Ave
Sun
leaf
W
ay
Chat
tleton Ln
Barbara Ln
Madrone Way
Mulford Way
La
rchmont
Ln
College
Ln
Barth Ave
Shef
field
Ct
Juarez
Ct
Wes
t C
t
Jean Ct
Homestea
d Cir
Shasta Ave
Westgate Cir
Las Morada
s Cir
Morning
Sun Dr
Alan Ct
Cardi
ff Ct
Austin Ct
Castro
St
Alpi
ne C
t
Eas
t Ct
Alva
ra
do S
q
Baker St
Dod
son St
Frie
da Ct
Shir
ley Ave
Randy Ln
Westv
iew Pl
Br
ookside A
ve
Regello Ct
Kathl
ee A
ve
Southridg
e D
r
Ju
dith
C
t
Natalie Ct
Drake W
ay
Miflin Ct
Don Way
Parkgate Ct
Mur
ra
Ct
Ce
dar Te
r
Br
oo
khav
en Ct
Bouquet Ave
Wildcat C
anyon P
ky
Maria
Veg
a Ct
Cuth
be
rtso
n Ct
Short Ave
Wanlass Ave
Castro R
d
Du
ke Pat
h
Glasgow Ct
Broadwalk Pl
Che
rrywood C
t
Groveview C
t
Leeds Ct
Carlto
n Ct
Hidal
go Ct
La Puerta Rd
Muir Ave
Bris
tol Ct
Claren
don Ct
Redwood Cir
Hann
on Dr
Pinewoo
d Ter
Chaparral
Ct
Man
zan
illa Ct
Cen
ter
Ct
Point
view Ln
Ca
mp
o Ve
rde Ci
r
Marque
tte
Ct
W
iswall Ct
Grand Canyon Ave
Oakwood Ct
Esp
ano
la Ct
Dim
m W
ay
20T
h St
Visalia Ave
Yuba
Ave
Ar
lington
Bl
vd
El P
ort
al Dr
26Th St
Will
ow Rd
Riverside Ave
16Th St
Rumr
ill Blvd
18Th
St
17T
h St
Shas
ta A
ve
14Th S
t
24Th
St
19Th S
t
15Th St
Robert Mi
ller D
r
Rumrill Blvd
Merri
tt A
ve
Rumril Blvd
21St St
18 Th
St
Post Ave 17Th S
t
Lake St
80 Casino A
ve
19Th St
Broa
dway A
ve
20 15Th St
17Th St
Blume D
r
Bush Ave
20Th
St
Ru
mrill Blvd
22N
d St
16T
h St
Mcbryde Ave
Rivers St
21St
St
Richm
ond
Pky
Bush Ave
22 Nd
St
Glenn Ave
Sanford Ave
13Th
St
Robert H Miller
Dr
18 Th St
Rumrill Blv
d
19T
h
St
Ma
rin Av
e
Rheem C
reek
Wildcat Creek
San P
ablo C
reek
Garrity C
ree
k
Sources: Esri, DeLorme, NAVTEQ, TomTom, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, O rdnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
±
00 . 2 0 . 40.1 Miles
Data Sources:

Roads: Tele Atlas
City Boundaries: Contra Costa County
Background: ESRI World Topographic Map
Map Created By:

EOA, Inc.

Date:

January 15th, 2014
City of San Pablo Full Trash Capture Map
R
h
e
e
m
C
r
e
e
k
W
i
l
d
c
a
t
C
r
e
e
k
S
a
n
P
a
b
l
o
C
r
e
e
k
G
a
r
r
i
t
y
C
r
e
e
k

LASSEN ST
P
A
R
K
A
V
E
B
O
N
I
T
A
R
D
N
A
R
L
I
N
G
T
O
N
B
L
V
D
3 8
T
H
S
T
R
U
M
R
I
L
L
B
L
V
D
D
O
U
G
L
A
S
S
T

CHURCH LN

JOHN AVE

PARR BLVD
S
A
N
P
A
B
L
O
D
A
M
R
D
V
I
L
L
A
D
R
3 5
T
H
S
T

ESMOND AVE

MC BRYDE AVE
C
O
L
E
T
T
E
D
R
H
I
L
L
T
O
P
M
A
L
L
R
D
DOWN
E
R AVE

VENTURA ST
C
A
N
T
E
R
B
U
R
Y
D
R
2 6
T
H
S
T
2 4
T
H
S
T
B
A
R
N
A
R
D
S
T
3 4
T
H
S
T
C
O
A
L
P
O
R
T
S
T
E
L
P
O
R
T
A
L
D
R

GRIFFIN DR
A
R
L
I
N
G
T
O
N
B
L
V
D

PINE AVE
G
L
E
N
L
O
C
K
S
T
V
I
A
V
E
R
D
E
3 6
T
H
S
T
R
A
M
P
25T
H
ST
22ND ST
21ST ST
Y
U
B
A
A
V
E
W
I
L
L
I
A
M
S
D
R
BUS
H
AVE
B
A
Y
O
V
I
S
T
A
A
V
E
G
R
O
V
E
V
I
E
W
D
R

RIVERS ST
S
T
J
O
S
E
P
H
S
C
E
M
E
T
E
R
Y

MORAN AVE
M
A
R
I
N
A
V
E
A
V
O
N
L
N
B
R
O
O
K
W
A
Y
15TH ST
H
I
L
L
V
I
E
W
D
R
H
I
L
L
T
O
P
D
R
G
R
E
E
N
W
O
O
D
D
R
FORD
H
AM ST
SHAN
E
DR
11TH ST
B
O
W
H
I
L
L
L
N
M
I
N
E
R
A
V
E
E

RLA WAY
K
E
L
L
E
Y
A
V
E
PAYN
E
DR
B
U
R
B
E
C
K
A
V
E

LAKE ST
I
8 0
F
W
Y
D
U
K
E
A
V
E
B
R
O
O
K
S
I
D
E
D
R
G
I
A
N
T
R
D
1 5T
H
ST
28T
H
ST
A
L
T
A
M
I
R
A
D
R
1 7
T
H
S
T
18T
H
ST
3 2
N
D
S
T

GARVIN AVE
2 9
T
H
S
T
20T
H
ST
B
A
R
K
L
E
Y
D
R
D
O
V
E
R
A
V
E
M
C
G
L
O
T
H
E
N
W
A
Y
F
O
L
S
O
M
A
V
E
13T
H
ST
M
I
S
S
I
O
N
B
E
L
L
D
R
M
A
N
O
R
D
R
B
I
R
M
I
N
G
H
A
M
D
R
E
M
E
R
I
C
A
V
E

BLUME DR
23RD ST
H
I
L
L
C
R
E
S
T
R
D
R
O
A
D
2 0
L
A
N
C
A
S
T
E
R
D
R
A
M
A
D
O
R
S
T
14TH ST
E
S
P
A
N
O
L
A
D
R
3 7
T
H
S
T
H
I
G
H
G
A
T
E
D
R
H

AYES ST
P
A
B
L
O
V
I
S
T
A
A
V
E
B
E
N
J
A
M
I
N
D
R
B
E
R
N
H
A
R
D
A
V
E
13 T
H
ST

LOWELL AVE
R
O
L
L
I
N
G
W
O
O
D
D
R
G
R
O
O
M
D
R
W
I
S
W
A
L
L
D
R
19TH ST
M
I
L
L
S
A
V
E
S
O
L
A
N
O
A
V
E
3 3
R
D
S
T
J
O
A
N
N
D
R
1 7
T
H
S
T
R
O
B
E
R
T
H
M
I
L
L
E
R
D
R
K
ER
N
ST
A
L
P
I
N
E
R
D
M
O
Y
E
R
S
R
D

MASON ST

COSTA AVE
20T
H
ST
R
H

EEM AVE

ANDRADE AVE
HUMP
H

REY AVE
18T
H
ST
M
A
N
Z
A
N
I
L
L
A
D
R
P
A
R
K
E
R
R
D
M
I
F
L
I
N
A
V
E

COLLINS AVE
H
E
L

LINGS AVE

DUNN AVE

GAYNOR AVE

LINCOLN AVE

COALINGA AVE
SA
N

PABLO AVE
H
I
L
L
T
O
P
M
A
L
L
21ST ST

TULARE AVE
S
O
N
O
M
A
S
T
30T
H
ST

VISALIA AVE
31ST ST

MC LAUG
H
LI
N
ST
B
E
L
F
A
S
T
W
A
Y
J
E

NKINS WAY
W
I
L
S
O
N
A
V
E

MARICOPA AVE

WENDELL AVE
K
E
A
R
N
E
Y
S
T
G
L
Y
N
I
S
D
R
R
O
S
E
A
R
B
O
R
A
V
E

YUBA ST
HUMBO
L
DT ST
M
A
R
O
V
I
C
H
L
N
T
H
O
M
A
S
D
R
P
A
L
M
E
R
A
V
E
O
B
R
I
E
N
R
D
G
A
R
R
I
T
Y
W
A
Y
L
O
Y
O
L
A
A
V
E
M
U
L
L
E
N
S
D
R

JOHNSON DR
S
A
N
P
A
B
L
O
A
V
E
A
C
A
P
U
L
C
O
D
R
R
A
L
S
T
O
N
A
V
E
O
X
F
O
R
D
A
V
E
F
A
I
R
M
E
D
E
D
R
H
E
N
D
E
R
S
O
N
D
R
R
I
D
G
E
R
D
M
C
B
R
Y
D
E
A
V
E
W
E
S
T
G
A
T
E
C
I
R
RAMP
S
T
A
N
T
O
N
A
V
E
G
O
N
Z
A
G
A
A
V
E
A
U
T
O
P
L
A
Z
A
A
B
E
R
D
E
E
N
W
A
Y
R
I
C
H
M
O
N
D
P
K
W
Y
M
O
N
T
E
R
E
Y
A
V
E
C
H

EVY WAY
G
I
L
M
A
D
R

LAKESIDE DR
M
C
K
E
N
Z
I
E
D
R
W
I
L
A
R
T
D
R
O
V
E
R
L
O
O
K
W
A
Y
D
E
V
O
N
W
A
Y
A
R
U
N
D
E
L
W
A
Y
P
A
R
K
R
I
D
G
E
D
R
8 4
4 5
10 6
7 9
14 14
14 12
2 1
3 13
11 SPB-01
Trash Generation Category
Low
Medium
High
Very High
Creek/Shoreline Hotspot
Trash Management Area
Full-Capture Location
Full Trash Capture
Non-Jurisdicational
(Dot color = Generation Category)
Streets
Creeks
Parcel Boundary
Map Matchline
San Pablo Full Trash Capture and Trash Management Area Map 0 0.1

0.2 0.05
Miles
8/3/2022
Information contained on these maps is for the
sole purpose of the Contra Costa Clean Water
Program. Accuracy of the data is not guaranteed.

Map Created By CCCWP GIS
Exhibit

2 –

City

San

Pablo

Full

Trash

Capture

and

Trash

Management

Area

Map

EXHIBIT 3

Section by Section Citywide Analysis of Trash Management Strategy City Section 1: South of Wildcat Creek from Western City boundary to 23rd Street TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
2 Very High Food Barn 1835 Rumrill Blvd • No know operating SD inlets
• Site has flooding
issues
On site visit to
determine the
existence of SD inlets
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
OVTA
2 High Lau Family
Center
1865 Rumrill Blvd
Suite G
• Parking lot has at least
one SD inlet
Ordinance to require private
FTC device or site trash
management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device
maintenance
records
2 Medium Rumrill Place
Apartments
1883 Rumrill Blvd • Gated Apartment
complex

On site visit to
determine the
existence of SD inlets
If site is well managed could
change base map to low; or
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
OVTA
2 High Folsom/ Dover
Neighborhood
Folsom Ave/Dover
from Rumrill to 18th
Street

• Currently 6 SD inlets
• Likely too small for
CPS units

Review SD inlet data
in Cartegraph to
determine if FTC
device will fit and
which type
FTC Device RFP for FTC device San Pablo
maintenance of
device and
tracking through
Cartegraph
2 High Dover
Neighborhood
Dover Ave. from
19th to 22nd Street

• No SD inlets or pipes
in this area
• Overland flow directly
to creek
On-land clean up Determine strategy for public
area on-land clean ups (e.g.
additional maintenance
personnel, RFP for on-land
clean ups, volunteer groups or
other)
OVTA
2 Very High 23rd Street
Pocket Park/
Trail

23rd Street Pocket
Park/ Trail

OVTA

City Section 2: Between Wildcat Creek and San Pablo Creek from Western City boundary to 23rd Street/San Pablo Ave.

TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash Management
Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
10 Very High Old Chevron
site
2001 Rumrill Blvd • Gated Site
• Vacant Lot
• Potentially City owned
in future
On site visit to
determine the
existence of SD inlets
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
OVTA
3 Very High
and
Medium
Rumrill
Business Park
2031 Rumrill Blvd • Has inlet on site Ordinance to require private FTC device or site trash
management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of
FTC device
maintenance
records or
OVTA
10 Medium Residential
Neighborhood
Rumrill to 23rd
south of Brookside
north of Wildcat
Creek
• SD inlets on Rumrill (3)
to can have FTC
devices installed
• 3 SD inlets Marelia Ct
• Inlets on Marelia too
small for FTC devices
Review new inlets
sizes on Rumrill and
Review SD inlet data
in Cartegraph to
determine if FTC
device will fit and
which type
FTC Device RFP for FTC device San Pablo
maintenance
of device and
tracking
through
Cartegraph
2 Very high Inglesa Ni
Cristo Church
2060 Brookside Dr • No known conditions Determine if any on- site inlets
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of
FTC device
maintenance
records or
OVTA
2 Very high Grocery Outlet
Center
2079 23rd St • No known conditions Determine if any on- site inlets
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of
FTC device
maintenance
records or
OVTA
2 Very high Kennedy
Plaza
Corner of
Brookside and 23rd
Street
• No SD inlets or pipes
in this area
• Overland flow directly
to creek
• Area could get
redeveloped with SPA
On-land clean up Determine strategy for public area
on-land clean ups (e.g. additional
maintenance personnel, RFP for
on-land clean ups, volunteer groups
or other)
OVTA
City Section 2: Between Wildcat Creek and San Pablo Creek from Western City boundary to 23rd Street/San Pablo Ave.

TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash Management
Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
Bridge Replacement
Project
10 Medium Residential
Neighborhood
Rumrill to 23rd north
of Brookside south
of San Pablo Creek
• One inlet on
Brookhaven
•
Review new inlets
sizes on Rumrill and
Review SD inlet data
in Cartegraph to
determine if FTC
device will fit and
which type
On-land clean up or FTC
Device
RFP for FTC device or
Determine strategy for public area
on-land clean ups (e.g. additional
maintenance personnel, RFP for
on-land clean ups, volunteer groups
or other)
San Pablo
maintenance
of device and
tracking
through
Cartegraph
Or
OVTA
10 Very High Old Chevron
site
2001 Rumrill Blvd • Gated Site
• Vacant Lot
• Potentially City owned
in future
On site visit to
determine the
existence of SD inlets
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
OVTA
11 Medium Checkers
towing
2274 Giant Hwy • No known inlets on
site
Determine if any on-
site inlets
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of
FTC device
maintenance
records or
OVTA

City Section 3: North of San Pablo Creek Between Rumrill and San Pablo Ave and Broadway TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash Management
Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
3 High Apartment
Complex
1320 Rd 20 • No known inlets on
site
•
On site visit to
determine the
existence of SD inlets
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of
FTC device
maintenance
records or
OVTA
3 High Residential
Neighborhood
Neighborhood
north of San Pablo
Creek south of
Road 20
• All properties drain
directly to creek
• Only 2 SD inlet on road
20 Review new inlets size
on Rumrill and Review
SD inlet data in
Cartegraph to
determine if FTC
device will fit and
which type

Need to determine
how to manage
residential that drains
directly to creek
On-land clean up or FTC
Device
RFP for FTC device or
Determine strategy for public area
on-land clean ups (e.g. additional
maintenance personnel, RFP for
on-land clean ups, volunteer groups
or other)
San Pablo
maintenance
of device and
tracking
through
Cartegraph
Or
OVTA
3 High Acacia Palms
Apartments/
Guadalupe
Campos
2134 Rd 20 • No know conditions Determine if any on-
site inlets
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of
FTC device
maintenance
records or
OVTA
3 High &
Medium
Kennedy
Plaza Dental
Building
2232 Rd 20 • City owns parking lot
(but not building)
• Site may be impacted
by SPA bridge project
• No known inlets
Determine if any on-
site inlets
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of
FTC device
maintenance
records or
OVTA
3 High Vacant lot
(parking lots)
14555 San Pablo
Ave
• No SD inlets
• Likely drains to SPA
Confirm area drains to
SPA
May require an update to
maps to include this area in
current FTC device or

RFP for FTC device or
Determine strategy for public area
on-land clean ups (e.g. additional
maintenance personnel, RFP for
San Pablo
maintenance
of device and
tracking
City Section 3: North of San Pablo Creek Between Rumrill and San Pablo Ave and Broadway TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash Management
Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
Need to check if can install
FTC on Purisima St or corner
of El Portal and SPA to cover
this area
on-land clean ups, volunteer groups
or other)
through
Cartegraph
Or
OVTA
3 High San Pablo
Ave. Roadway
SPA from Purisima
St to Broadway

• Need to determine
where this drains
Confirm area drains to
SPA
May require an update to
maps to include this area in
current FTC device or

Need to check if can install
FTC on Purisima St or corner
of El Portal and SPA to cover
this area
RFP for FTC device or
Determine strategy for public area
on-land clean ups (e.g. additional
maintenance personnel, RFP for
on-land clean ups, volunteer groups
or other)
San Pablo
maintenance
of device and
tracking
through
Cartegraph
Or
OVTA

City Section 4: North of San Pablo Creek Between Giant and Broadway and Rumrill TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash Management
Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
11 Medium Mac Arthur
Church
- 2301 Rumrill Blvd • One inlet on site near
meal on wheels site

None Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of
FTC device
maintenance
records or
OVTA
11 Medium Westgate
housing
Westgate Cr • Complex with good
HOA
• Very Clean site
• Has SD inlets on site
one If site is well managed could
change base map to low; or
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
OVTA
11 Medium Westpark
Apartment
Complex

2600 Giant Hwy • Gated Community with
good HOA
• Has on site drains
None If site is well managed could
change base map to low; or
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
OVTA
11 Medium Devon Square
Condos

2741 Holly Street • Many inlets on site None Ordinance requiring on-site trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of
FTC device
maintenance
records or
OVTA
5 High Giant Road
Apartments
2832 Giant Hwy • Many inlets on site None Ordinance requiring on-site trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of
FTC device
maintenance
records or
OVTA
11 Medium Residential
Neighborhood
Remaining
residential area
between Giant Rd,
Broadway Ave. and
Rumrill Blvd.
• Need to determine
drainage areas for this
location.
• Potential for much of
the area north of Lake
Elementary and Colin
St, an west of 15th
Street to be treated by
Review new inlets size
on Rumrill and Review
SD inlet data in
Cartegraph to
determine if FTC
device will fit and
which type
- 2 on Road 20

City Section 4: North of San Pablo Creek Between Giant and Broadway and Rumrill TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash Management
Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
potential future LID
near school site
- 12 on Giant
Rd.
- 3 on Trenton
- 4 on Kelly
5 High Giant Trade
Center

3000 Giant Hwy • Many inlets on site None Ordinance requiring on-site trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of
FTC device
maintenance
records or
OVTA

City Section 5: North of Broadway Ave and Rumrill Blvd between Giant Rd. and San Pablo Ave.

3000 Giant Hwy • Many inlets on site None Ordinance requiring on-site trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
11 Medium Residential
Neighborhood
Neighborhood
between Giant
trade Center and
11th St.

• FTC devices (11)
- Stonington (1)
- Connecticut (3)
- Stanton (1)
- John (2)
- Miner (2)
- Giant (2)

Review SD inlet data
in Cartegraph to
determine if FTC
device will fit and
which type

Potential for this area
to be covered by one
large device near
Connecticut Ave or
13th St.

Determine strategy for public
area on-land clean ups (e.g.
additional maintenance
personnel, RFP for on-land
clean ups, volunteer groups or
other)
OVTA
City Section 5: North of Broadway Ave and Rumrill Blvd between Giant Rd. and San Pablo Ave.

Determine strategy for public
area on-land clean ups (e.g.
additional maintenance
personnel, RFP for on-land
clean ups, volunteer groups or
other)
OVTA
3 Medium Corner of San
Pablo Ave.
and Rivers
Fraternal Order of
Eagles- 2100
Rivers St,
San Pablo Motel-
14771 San Pablo
Ave
Parking lot on the
corner of Rivers
and 21s
• Need to determine
drainage for this
location.

• San Pablo Motel has
on site SD inlets
• Need to determine
drainage for this
location.

• May need a FTC
device on Howard
or Rivers near
14th to cover this
area?

• 2100 Rivers should
either already be
covered by a FTC
• San Pablo Motel will
likely require
ordinance requiring
on-site trash
management
• Parking lot will be
covered by City-owned
FTC
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement for private parcel

RFP for FTC device or
Determine strategy for public
area on-land clean ups (e.g.
additional maintenance
personnel, RFP for on-land
clean ups, volunteer groups or
other) for areas that drain to
public ROW
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
City Section 5: North of Broadway Ave and Rumrill Blvd between Giant Rd. and San Pablo Ave.

OVTA

City Section 6: East of SPA North of El Portal to I-80 (including parcels on El Portal)

TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
3 Medium Roadway Inn 14800 San Pablo
Ave
• SD inlets on site None Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
3 Medium Public Storage 14820 San Pablo
Ave
• No know conditions Determine if any
SD inlets on site
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
3,
14 &
1 Medium
and High
El Portal Drive
(roadway)

El Portal from
Mission Bell Dr. to
Church Lane
• 4 SD Inlets Review SD inlet
data in Cartegraph
to determine if FTC
device will fit and
which type

FTC RFP for FTC device or
Determine strategy for public
area on-land clean ups (e.g.
additional maintenance
personnel, RFP for on-land
clean ups, volunteer groups or
other)
RFP for FTC device
or
Determine strategy
for public area on-
land clean ups (e.g.
additional
maintenance
personnel, RFP for
on-land clean ups,
volunteer groups or
other)
NA Medium Self-Storage
Facility and
Future Park
Project
2600 Moraga • The map is incorrect at
this site. Used to be a
school site so listed as
non-jurisdictional however
is owned by the City.
• Half of the parcel is
currently undergoing
redevelopment as a self-
storage facility, will be C.3
Compliance.
• Half of the site has plans
to be redeveloped as a
Park.

None None- Site will be
compliance after
development.

None Current FTC
maintenance
schedule.

City Section 6: East of SPA North of El Portal to I-80 (including parcels on El Portal)

TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
14 Medium West County
School District
Maintenance
Yard
2550 Moraga Road • SD Inlets on site • None Ordinance requiring on-site trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
14 Medium County
Transition
Housing site
2555 El Portal Dr • Current under re-
development to be
transitional housing
Need to ensure
site installs FTC.

This condition was
part of their
development
agreement.

None None Review of FTC
device maintenance
records
14 Medium Vacant
Building
2523 El Portal Dr
STE. 201
• Currently vacant site Need to determine
if SD inlets on site
• Ordinance requiring
on-site trash
management
• If sold or re-developed
then include conditions
regarding trash
controls
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
14 Medium Rancho San
Pablo
2561-2595 El
Portal Drive (HOA)
• Inlets on site None Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
1 Medium Daytona
Motors
2697 El Portal Dr • Unknown Need to determine
if SD inlets on site
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management

OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
1 Medium
and high
El Portal/
Rollingwood
Roadway

El Portal Dr./
Rollingwood Dr.

• 3 SD inlets in the area
without FTC devices
Determine where
the road drains.

Review SD inlet
data in Cartegraph
to determine if FTC
device will fit and
which type

2850 El Portal Dr.

2846 El Portal Dr.

2732 El Portal Dr.

2716 El Portal Dr.

2708 El Portal Dr.

2652 Church Ln.
• Unknown Need to determine
if SD inlets on site

Need to determine
if they drain to the
street and are
covered by the
FTC on El Portal or
if they drain
directly to the
creek
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management

OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
1 High County
Owned Creek
Parcel
APN 416-102-007 • No infrastructure None MOU with the County requiring on-site trash
management

Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA

City Section 7: South of El Portal, East of Church Lane to I-80 and San Pablo Dam Road

TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
1 &
14 All Willow
neighborhood
and San Pablo
Town Center
Multiple • The entire area should be
covered by the new FTC
device(s) installed as part
of the Caltrans project
If there are any
areas not covered
by current FTC or
the new Caltrans
FTC then we will
need to determine
if a FTC device will
service that area.

City Section 8: Triangle South of Road 20 between Church Lane and Sand Pablo Ave TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
1 High Church Lane
housing
2555 Church Ln • Unknown Determine if SD
inlets on site

If no SD inlet we
need to determine
where the area
drains to
Likely drains to device on
Church Lane if not:

Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management

OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
1 High Kimball’s
Mobile Home
Park
2451 Church Ln • Has multiple SD inlets on
site
None Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
1 High Mobile Home
Park
2425 Church Ln • Unknown Determine if SD
inlets on site

If no SD inlet we
need to determine
where the area
drains to
Likely drains to device on
Church Lane if not:

Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management

OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
1 High MUD 2637 Braga Ln • Has multiple SD inlets on
site
None Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
1 High &
Medium
Idle Wheels
Mobile Home
Park
13900 San Pablo
Ave
• Has multiple SD inlets on
site
None Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
1 Medium San Pablo PD 13880 San Pablo
Ave
• Has multiple SD inlets on
site
• PD will be moving to a
new building and the site
will be redeveloped
None While City-owned manage
with on-site trash pick-up
and when sold managed
through LID compliance
none OVTA
1 Medium iSmile Dental 13902 San Pablo
Ave
• Unknown Determine if SD
inlets on site

If no SD inlet we
need to determine
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
City Section 8: Triangle South of Road 20 between Church Lane and Sand Pablo Ave TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
where the area
drains to
1 Medium Old Fire
Station, now
operated by
PD
13928 San Pablo
Ave
• Unknown None While City-owned manage
with on-site trash pick-up
and when sold managed
through LID compliance
none OVTA
1 Medium DaVita 14020 San Pablo
Ave
• Unknown Determine if SD
inlets on site

If no SD inlet we
need to determine
where the area
drains to
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
1 Medium N/A 2364 Rd 20 • Site is currently in
development review
None Site will be treated through
new development
none Review of FTC or C3
O&M schedule
1 High N/A 2394 Rd 20 / 2422
Rd 20
• This seems to be a shared
parking lot with two
different buildings
• Has SD inlets on site
Need to determine
if current public
ROW FTC treats
this area.

Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
14 High Speedway
Gas Station
2601 Rd 20 • Has SD inlets on site None Ordinance requiring on-site trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA

City Section 9: South of SPA, North of City Boundary from 23rd to Church Lane TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
8 Medium
and High
Powell Street Powell Street and
adjacent residential
• No SD inlets or pipes in
this location. Area drains
directly to creek vis
overland flow
None On-land clean up Determine strategy for public
area on-land clean ups (e.g.
additional maintenance
personnel, RFP for on-land
clean ups, volunteer groups or
other)
OVTA
2 &
8 Medium
and High
Mason Street Mason Street and
adjacent residential
• No SD inlets or pipes in
this location. Area drains
directly to creek vis
overland flow
Confirm that all of
the street drains
towards the creek
On-land clean up Determine strategy for public
area on-land clean ups (e.g.
additional maintenance
personnel, RFP for on-land
clean ups, volunteer groups or
other)
OVTA
2 &
8 Medium
and High
Van Ness
Street
Van Ness Street
and adjacent
residential
• 4 SD inlets in on this
street
Determine where
the road drains.

Review SD inlet
data in Cartegraph
to determine if FTC
device will fit and
which type

FTC RFP for FTC device or
Determine strategy for public
area on-land clean ups (e.g.
additional maintenance
personnel, RFP for on-land
clean ups, volunteer groups or
other)
RFP for FTC device
or
Determine strategy
for public area on-
land clean ups (e.g.
additional
maintenance
personnel, RFP for
on-land clean ups,
volunteer groups or
other)
City Section 9: South of SPA, North of City Boundary from 23rd to Church Lane TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
2 &
8 Medium
and High
Dodson Street Dodson Street and
adjacent residential
• 2 SD inlets. Determine where
the road drains.

Review SD inlet
data in Cartegraph
to determine if FTC
device will fit and
which type

If no SD inlet we
need to determine
where the area
drains to
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
8 Medium Church Lane Church Lane
Roadway
• 6 SD inlets Review SD inlet
data in Cartegraph
to determine if FTC
device will fit and
which type
FTC RFP for FTC device or
Determine strategy for public
area on-land clean ups (e.g.
additional maintenance
personnel, RFP for on-land
RFP for FTC device
or
Determine strategy
for public area on-
land clean ups (e.g.

City Section 10: South of SPA, North of City Boundary from Church Lane to Vale TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
1 Very High San Pablo
Library
13751 San Pablo
Ave
• Inlets on site
• Site is operated by the
City but owned by private
entity
Does the City want
to require by
ordinance or
managed the site
internally

Review SD inlet
data in on site,
information not in
Cartegraph
FTC RFP for FTC device or
Determine strategy for public
area on-land clean ups (e.g.
additional maintenance
personnel, RFP for on-land
clean ups, volunteer groups or
other)
RFP for FTC device
or
Determine strategy
for public area on-
land clean ups (e.g.
additional
maintenance
personnel, RFP for
on-land clean ups,
volunteer groups or
other)
1 Medium Vacant Lot 13717 San Pablo
Ave.
• Currently in development
process
None Site will be managed
through development
conditions
FTC and LID Review of FTC or C3
O&M schedule
1 Medium Parcel C and
D: Future PD
building and
Housing
Development
N/A • Both parcels are currently
in the development
process
None Site will be managed
through development
conditions
FTC and LID Review of FTC or C3
O&M schedule
1 Medium Brookvale
Medical
Center
2111 Vale Rd • Site is partially covered by
LID
Check if other
inlets on site, if not
then covered
determine if area is
covered by the
LID.

May need FTC in
LID due to sizing
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
1 Medium Lifelong
Medical
Center
2023 Vale Rd • Unknown Determine if SD
inlets on site. If not
determine where
area drains, may
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
City Section 10: South of SPA, North of City Boundary from Church Lane to Vale TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
already be covered
by FTC.
1 Medium Vale Road
Roadway
Vale Road • All known inlets have FTC
devices.

Need to determine
where remaining
area drains to
determine if
mapping needs
update or if there is
an additional drain.

FTC RFP for FTC device or
Determine strategy for public
area on-land clean ups (e.g.
additional maintenance
personnel, RFP for on-land
clean ups, volunteer groups or
other)
RFP for FTC device
or
Determine strategy
for public area on-
land clean ups (e.g.
additional
maintenance
personnel, RFP for
on-land clean ups,
volunteer groups or
other)
1 Medium Creek
Area/trail
None • There are parcels that are
solely creek area
• Currently do creek and
shoreline clean ups
How do we deal
with this from a
trash mapping
perspective?
Unknown. Potentially need
to discuss this area with
Water Board and get it
removed from the map?

TBD TBD
1 Medium Salesian
College Prep
2851 Salesian Ave,
Richmond, CA
94804
• Football field is in San
Pablo, remaining school
area is in Richmond
• Site is on old version of
SD TMA map but not in
the updated online version
Determine if any
SD inlets on site

Need to fix
CCCWP online
mapping tool
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA

City Section 11: South of San Pablo Ave, North of City Boundary from Vale to San Pablo Ave.

13255 San Pablo
Ave
• Property with Casino
Building is non-
jurisdictional.
• City has jurisdiction over
parking lots
• Site has some LID
Determine if any
SD inlets on site

Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
1 Medium San Pablo
Ave. Roadway
San Pablo Ave.

Roadway
• Most SD inlets on SPA
have FTC devices.
• 2 remaining without FTC
• Need to determine how
area drains
Need to determine
how area drains

Some area may
drain to Richmond

Review SD inlet
data in on site,
information not in
Cartegraph
FTC RFP for FTC device or
Determine strategy for public
area on-land clean ups (e.g.
additional maintenance
personnel, RFP for on-land
clean ups, volunteer groups or
other)
RFP for FTC device
or
Determine strategy
for public area on-
land clean ups (e.g.
additional
maintenance
personnel, RFP for
on-land clean ups,
volunteer groups or
other)
1 Medium El Pollo Loco 13139 San Pablo
Ave
• Hs inlets on site Need to determine
if some of the site
drains to public
ROW
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
1 High Chevron San
Pablo
13065 San Pablo
Ave
• Unknown Determine if SD
inlets on site
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
1 Medium MUD? 13041 San Pablo
Ave, Richmond, CA
94805
• Unknown Determine if SD
inlets on site
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
1 Medium World Gas
Station
13013 San Pablo
Ave, Richmond, CA
94805
• Unknown Determine if SD
inlets on site
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA

City Section 12: North of San Pablo Ave. East to I-80 to Southern City Boundary to San Pablo Dam Road TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement
to implement Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
1 Very high Food Maxx
Shopping
Center
13220 San Pablo
Ave.
• Unknown Determine if SD
inlets on site
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC device
maintenance records or
OVTA
1 High Villa Alvarado
Apartments
1330 Contra Costa
Ave m303
• Unknown Determine if SD
inlets on site
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC device
maintenance records or
OVTA
1 Medium San Pablo
Mini Storage
5310 Riverside Ave • Unknown Determine if SD
inlets on site
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC device
maintenance records or
OVTA
1 Medium Glenn Ave
Neighborhood

Residential on
Glenn, Brookside
and Joel
• 3 SD inlets Review SD inlet
data in Cartegraph
to determine if FTC
device will fit and
which type

FTC RFP for FTC device or
Determine strategy for public
area on-land clean ups (e.g.
additional maintenance
personnel, RFP for on-land
clean ups, volunteer groups
or other)
RFP for FTC device or
Determine strategy for
public area on-land
clean ups (e.g.
additional maintenance
personnel, RFP for on-
land clean ups,
volunteer groups or
other)
1 High Montoya
Garden
Apartments
5005 Montoya Ave,
Richmond, CA
94805
• Unknown Determine if SD
inlets on site
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC device
maintenance records or
OVTA

City Section 13: East of I-80 and San Pablo Dam Road/ Amador to City Boundary TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
12 Medium Glenn Ave.

Yuba
Neighborhood
to Riverside
Elementary
Residential
Neighborhood with
Shasta Ave, Marin
Ave, Gerald Ave,
Yuba St, Casino
Ave
• 4 SD inlets
• This neighborhood is
usually clean
None Outreach with OVTAs Outreach with OVTAs OVTA
12 Medium Alpine Road Alpine Road and
adjacent residential
• 1 SD inlet Review SD inlet
data in Cartegraph
to determine if FTC
device will fit and
which type

FTC RFP for FTC device or
Determine strategy for public
area on-land clean ups (e.g.
additional maintenance
personnel, RFP for on-land
clean ups, volunteer groups or
other)
RFP for FTC device
or
Determine strategy
for public area on-
land clean ups (e.g.
additional
maintenance
personnel, RFP for
on-land clean ups,
volunteer groups or
other)
13 Medium Frontier
Mobile Home
Park
2990 San Pablo
Dam Rd
• Unknown Determine if SD
inlets on site
Ordinance requiring on-site
trash management
OVTA to justify ordinance
requirement
Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
4 &
13 Medium
and High
San Pablo
Dam Road
(SPDR)
Roadway

San Pablo Dam
Road (SPDR)
Roadway

• No current devices on
SPDR
• 18 potential locations for
SD inlet devices
Review SD inlet
data in Cartegraph
to determine if FTC
device will fit and
which type

Determine if 2-3
large devices could
capture large
areas

Three (3) new devices near
Morro Dr. OR potentially
one large devices near
Jellys (not sure if feasible)

Potentially 2-3 large
devices for East end
- One near 4100
Barranca St.
- One near 3445
San Pablo Dam
Road
TBD Review of FTC
device maintenance
records or OVTA
City Section 13: East of I-80 and San Pablo Dam Road/ Amador to City Boundary TMA Trash
Genera-
tion Rate
Location
Name
Address Current Conditions Items still to be
determined
Anticipated Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated Requirement to
implement Trash
Management Strategy
Anticipated
Ongoing
Compliance
Requirement
Need to do
analysis to
determine if it is
more cost effective
to do large or small
devices and if
either devices will
cover private
drainage areas
- One southwest of
3255 SPDR near
Public Storage

There is the potential that a
combination of devices in
the Public ROW will
address all or most of the
private properties on
SPDR. If public FTC do not
cover the private areas
then the below address
need to be assessed

4 High Jelly’s Place 2905 San Pablo
Dam Rd
• Unknown Determine if SD
inlets on site