Agenda packet — San Rafael City Council, June 2, 2025 (part 1 of 3)

AGENDA
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL - MONDAY, JUNE 2, 2025
REGULAR MEETING AT 6:00 P.M.

San Rafael City Hall, Council Chambers
1400 Fifth Avenue, San Rafael, CA 94901
Watch Online:

Watch on Zoom Webinar: https://tinyurl.com/city-council-1 Watch on YouTube: www.youtube.com/cityofsanrafael
Listen by phone: (669) 444-9171
ID: 863-4489-1398
This meeting will be held in-person. This meeting is being streamed to YouTube at www.youtube.com/cityofsanrafael.

How to participate in the meeting:
• You are welcome to come to the meeting and provide public comment in person. Each speaker will have 2-minutes to provide public comment per agenda item. • Submit your comments by email to [email protected] by 4:00 p.m. the day of the meeting.

If you experience technical difficulties during the meeting, please contact [email protected].

OPEN SESSION – THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM – 4:30 PM

1. Mayor Kate to announce Closed Session items.

CLOSED SESSION – THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM – 4:30 PM

2. Closed Session:
a. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: 350 Merrydale Road / 3833 Redwood Highway, San Rafael APNs 179-041-27 & 179-041-28
Agency negotiator: Cristine Alilovich, City Manager; John Stefanski, Assistant City Manager; Daniel Cooperman, Community Services Division Director
Negotiating parties: Ridgewood Properties, a California General Partnership, as to an undivided ½ interest; and Francine M. Clayton, Trustee of The Francine M. Clayton 1996 Trust, as to an undivided ½ interest
Under negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
b. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: 620 Canal Street, San Rafael, CA (APN 014-162-01) Agency negotiator: Cristine Alilovich, City Manager; Micah Hinkle, Director of Community Economic Department; Greg Minor, Assistant Director of Community and Economic Development
Negotiating parties: The Anthony Cavallo Trust
Under negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment
CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS:
(including AB 1234 Reports on Meetings and Conferences Attended at City Expense)

3. City Manager and Councilmember Reports:
2 CONSENT CALENDAR:

The opportunity for public comment on consent calendar items will occur prior to the City Council’s vote on the Consent Calendar. The City Council may approve the entire consent calendar with one action. In the alternative, items on the Consent Calendar may be removed by any City Council or staff member, for separate discussion and vote.

4. Consent Calendar Items:
a. Approval of Minutes
Approve Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of May 19, 2025 (CC) Recommended Action - Approve minutes as submitted
b. Proclamations
Proclamations Supporting National Immigrant Heritage Month, National Gun Violence Awareness Month, Alzheimer’s and Brain Awareness Month, LGBTQIA+ Pride Month, Juneteenth, Rev. Dr. Jane “Janie” Adams Spahr
Recommended Action – Receive and file
c. Electric Vehicle (EV) Fleet Electrification Program Contract Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Negotiate and Enter into Contracts and Sign Letters of Commitment with Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the EV Fleet Electrification Program for City Facilities. CEQA Determination: Exempt Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15311, 15303, and/or 15301 (CM)
Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution
d. Library Parcel Tax Rate for Fiscal Year 2025-26
Report Establishing the Annual Rate Adjustment for the Special Library Services Parcel Tax for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 as Authorized by San Rafael Municipal Code Chapter 3.36 (Voter-Approved Measure D) (Fin)
Recommended Action – Accept report
e. Ambulance Service Cost Recovery Agreement
Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Agreements Allowing the San Rafael Fire Department to Participate in a Medi-Cal Intergovernmental Transfer (IGT) Program with the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) and Kaiser for the Service Period of January 1, 2024 Through December 31, 2024 (FD)
Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution
f. Paramedic Tax Rate for FY 2025-26
Resolution Maintaining Paramedic Service Special Tax Rates at Their Current Levels for Fiscal Year 2025-26 (FD)
Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution
g. Report on 2024 Fire Prevention Inspections of Certain Occupancies Resolution Acknowledging Receipt of a Report Made by the Fire Chief/Fire Marshal Regarding the Fire Prevention Inspections of Certain Occupancies Pursuant to Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 of the California Health and Safety Code for Calendar Year 2024 (FD) Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution
3 h. Bay point Lagoons Assessment District
Baypoint Lagoons Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Annual Assessment FY 2025-26: (PW)
i. Resolution Directing Filing of Engineer's Annual Report FY 2025-26 Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution
ii. Resolution Approving Engineer's Annual Report FY 2025-26 Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution
iii. Resolution of Intention to Order Improvements and Setting a Public Hearing on the Annual Assessment for the City Council Meeting of June 23, 2025 Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution
i. Point San Pedro Road Median Landscaping Assessment District Point San Pedro Road Median Landscaping Assessment District Annual Assessment FY 2025-26 (PW)
i. Resolution Directing Filing of Engineer's Annual Report FY 2025-2026 Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution
ii. Resolution Approving Engineer's Annual Report FY 2025-26 Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution
iii. Resolution of Intention to Order Improvements and Setting a Public Hearing on the Annual Assessment for the City Council Meeting of June 23, 2025 Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution
j. Design and Utility Coordination for Electric Vehicle Charging Installations Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Professional Services Agreement with NV5 Consultants, Inc. to Assist with the Design and Utility Coordination for Electric Vehicle Charging Installations in an Amount Not to Exceed $70,000 for the Public Works Facility (PW)
Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

5. Special Presentations
a. Presentation of Proclamation in Recognition of Rev. Dr. Jane “Janie” Adams Spahr

PUBLIC HEARINGS

6. Public Hearings
a. Military Equipment Use
Resolution Renewing the Ordinance Adopting San Rafael Police Department Military Equipment Use Policy 706; Adding Two Drones for Use as First Responders; and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Purchase Order with Flock Group, Inc. in an Amount Not to Exceed $500,000, Subject to Council Appropriation (PD) Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution

OTHR AGENDA ITEMS

7. Other Agenda Items
4 a. Three-Year Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2025-2028 and Performance Metrics Resolution Adopting the City Council’s Three-Year Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2025- 2028 (CM)
Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution

PUBLIC HEARINGS

8. Public Hearings
a. Proposed Update to Master Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Resolution Updating the City’s Master Fee Schedule for Fiscal Year 2025-26 (Fin) Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution

OTHR AGENDA ITEMS

9. Other Agenda Items
a. Final Citywide Budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26, GANN Legal Spending Limit, Measure A Workplan, And Capital Improvement Program
i. Resolution Approving the Citywide Budget and Capital Improvement Program Budget for the Fiscal Year 2025-26, Providing for the Appropriations and Expenditure of All Sums Set Forth in the Budget in the Amount of $192,282,438, with Net Appropriations of $163,777,889
Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution
ii. Resolution Approving Fiscal Year 2025-26 GANN Appropriations Limit at $197,230,566 Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution
iii. Resolution Approving the Measure A Work Plan for Proposed Expenditure of Measure A Funds for FY 2025-26
Recommended Action – Adopt Resolution
iv. Approval of the Capital Improvement Program for FY 2025-26 Through FY 2027-28 Recommended Action – Approve the Capital Improvement Program

OPEN TIME FOR PUBLIC EXPRESSION
The public is welcome to address the City Council at this time on matters not on the agenda that are within its jurisdiction. Please be advised that pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2, the City Council is not permitted to discuss or take action on any matter not on the agenda unless it determines that an emergency exists, or that there is a need to take immediate action which arose following posting of the agenda. Comments may be no longer than two minutes and should be respectful to the community.

ADJOURNMENT:

Any records relating to an agenda item, received by a majority or more of the Council less than 72 hours before the meeting, shall be available for inspection online and at City Hall, 1400 Fifth Avenue, and placed with other agendarelated materials on the table in front of the Council Chamber prior to the meeting. Sign Language interpreters may be requested by calling (415) 485-3066 (voice), emailing [email protected] or using the California Telecommunications Relay Service by dialing “711”, at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Copies of documents are available in accessible formats upon request. To request Spanish language interpretation, please submit an online form at https://www.cityofsanrafael.org/request-for-interpretation/.

Minutes subject to approval at the June 2, 2025 City Council meeting AGENDA
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL - MONDAY, MAY 19, 2025
REGULAR MEETING AT 6:00 P.M.

San Rafael City Hall, Council Chambers
1400 Fifth Avenue, San Rafael, CA 94901
Watch Online:

Watch on Zoom Webinar: https://tinyurl.com/city-council-2 Watch on YouTube: www.youtube.com/cityofsanrafael
Listen by phone: (669) 444-9171
ID: 860-6190-5675#
One Tap Mobile: +16694449171,,86061905675# US
This meeting will be held in-person. This meeting is being streamed to YouTube at www.youtube.com/cityofsanrafael.

If you experience technical difficulties during the meeting, please contact [email protected].

OPEN SESSION – THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM – 4:45 PM

1. Mayor Kate announced Closed Session items.

CLOSED SESSION – THIRD FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM – 4:45 PM

2. Closed Session:
a. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2) b. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Property: 350 Merrydale Road / 3833 Redwood Highway, San Rafael APNs 179-041-27 & 179-041-28
Agency negotiator: Cristine Alilovich, City Manager; John Stefanski, Assistant City Manager; Daniel Cooperman, Community Services Division Director
Negotiating parties: Ridgewood Properties, a California General Partnership, as to an undivided ½ interest; and Francine M. Clayton, Trustee of The Francine M. Clayton 1996 Trust, as to an undivided ½ interest
Under negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment

Present: Vice Mayor Bushey
Councilmember Hill
Councilmember Kertz
Councilmember Llorens Gulati
Mayor Kate

Absent: None
2 Also Present: City Manager Cristine Alilovich
City Attorney Robert Epstein
City Clerk Lindsay Lara
Mayor Kate called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. and invited City Clerk Lindsay Lara to call the roll. All members of the City Council were present.

City Attorney Robert Epstein announced that no reportable action was taken in Closed Session that evening or following the City Council meeting on May 5, 2025.

Mayor Kate offered gratitude to City staff, announced the San Rafael Pacifics’ game honoring City Employees on May 30 (featuring Liz Paez singing the National Anthem and Damian Oboyo throwing the first pitch), and delivered a land acknowledgment.

City Clerk Lindsay Lara informed the community that the in-person meeting would also be recorded and streamed live to YouTube and through Zoom. She noted the two-minute timer for public comment and closed captioning on Zoom.

CITY MANAGER AND COUNCILMEMBER REPORTS:
(including AB 1234 Reports on Meetings and Conferences Attended at City Expense)

3. City Manager and Councilmember Reports:

City Manager Cristine Alilovich reported/announced:
• Expressed appreciation to Reverand Jan Heglund, Retiring After 27 Years • National Emergency Management Services Week May 18-24, 2025 • National Public Works Week May 18-24, 2025
• Public Works Open House event on Wednesday, May 20, 2025 • Temporarily prohibited camping at City Hall property from May 19 through June 9, and at Canalways property from May 27 through June 17, to allow wildfire mitigation teams to conduct vegetation management.
• Food vending enforcement plan in the Canal neighborhood • Pride month celebration and flag raising ceremony at City Hall on June 2nd at 5:45pm • 2nd Annual Pride Art Walk Puzzle Contest from June 1st through June 30th City Councilmember Reports:
• Vice Mayor Bushey reported on Central Marin Sanitation Agency, State of the City Dinner, San Rafael Library Foundation Annual Donor Dinner, and San Rafael Sanitation District.
• Councilmember Kertz reported on Marin Wildfire Prevention Authority, Homeless Policy Steering Committee, San Rafael Library Foundation Dinner, State of the City, and Community Action Marin ribbon cutting.
• Councilmember Hill reported on keynote address at the 2025 Asian Scholarship Banquet, May Madness, Finance Subcommittee, State of the City, and Youth in Arts 4th Annual C Street Celebration.
• Councilmember Llorens Gulati reported on Canal Alliance and the San Francisco Foundation, Leadership Academy Graduation, May Madness, Canal Promise Neighborhood Steering Committee, Quarterly Supervisor Rodoni meeting, State of the City, and Marin Clean Energy meeting.
• Mayor Kate reported on Sonoma Marin Area Rail Transit, Transportation Authority of Marin Executive Meeting, Homelessness and Housing Subcommittee, Marin Transit, 3 North Bay Leadership Lunch, Gun Safety Collaboration, and June 17th meeting is cancelled and rescheduled to June 23rd.

Mayor Kate invited public comment; however, there was none.

CONSENT CALENDAR:

Mayor Kate invited public comment; however, there was none.

Councilmember Llorens Gulati moved and Councilmember Kertz seconded to approve the Consent Calendar

4. Consent Calendar Items:
a. Approval of Minutes
Approve Minutes of the Regular and Special City Council Meetings of May 5, 2025 (CC) Approved minutes as submitted
b. Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps Final Adoption of Ordinance 2047: An Ordinance to Designate Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Areas (FD)
Final Adoption of Ordinance 2047
c. Purchasing Policy and Public Works Contracts Policy Updates i. Final Adoption of Ordinance 2048: An Ordinance Amending Chapter 2.55 of the San Rafael Municipal Code Titled “Purchasing Policy” (Fin)
Final Adoption of Ordinance 2048
ii. Final Adoption of Ordinance 2049: An Ordinance Amending Chapter 11.50 of the San Rafael Municipal Code, Titled “Public Works Contract Policy” (Fin) Final Adoption of Ordinance 2049
d. Special Event Street Closures in San Rafael
Resolution Authorizing the Temporary Closure of Streets in San Rafael for Special Events (PD)
Adopted Resolution 15407
e. Proclamation
Proclamation Supporting National Public Works Week 2025, May 18 - 24, 2025 and a Proclamation for Reverand Jan Heglund, Retiring After 27 Years Received and filed
AYES: Councilmembers: Bushey, Hill, Kertz, Llorens Gulati & Mayor Kate NOES: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: None

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

5. Special Presentations
Mayor Kate invited public comment.

Speakers: District Attorney Frugoli
4 a. Presentation of Proclamation for Reverand Jan Heglund, Retiring After 27 Years Mayor Kate presented the proclamation to Reverand Jan Heglund, and Reverend Jan made comments.

Mate Kate called a recess at 6:37 p.m. and called the meeting to order at 6:47 p.m.

OTHR AGENDA ITEMS

6. Other Agenda Items
a. Preliminary Citywide Proposed Budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Preliminary Citywide Proposed Budget and Proposed Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2025-26 (Fin)
City Manager Cristine Alilovich provided comments, Finance Director Paul Navazio presented the budget portion of the Staff Report, and Assistant Public Works Director Joanna Kwok presented the Capital Improvement Project portion of the Staff Report.

Staff responded to questions from the City Council.

Mayor Kate invited public comment; however, there was none.

City Council provided comments.

Councilmember Kertz moved and Vice Mayor Bushey seconded to accept the report.

AYES: Councilmembers: Bushey, Hill, Kertz, Llorens Gulati & Mayor Kate NOES: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: None
Accepted report

OPEN TIME FOR PUBLIC EXPRESSION
None.

ADJOURNMENT:

Mayor Kate adjourned the meeting at 8:21 pm.
__________________________
LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk
APPROVED THIS _____DAY OF____________, 2025
_____________________________________
KATE COLIN, Mayor
City of San Rafael
Proclamation in Recognition of

NATIONAL IMMIGRANT HERITAGE MONTH
June 1 – 30, 2025
WHEREAS, People from around the globe have migrated to the United States, seeking opportunity, safety, connection, and a new beginning. While many have arrived in pursuit of better livelihoods and family reunification, others have been displaced by forces beyond their control—including violence, war, political instability, corruption, climate change, and poverty; and WHEREAS, any discussion of migration must be grounded in the historical context of colonization, which disrupted Indigenous cultures, ecosystems, and sovereignty. The lands on which we live—including the land now called San Rafael—were first stewarded by the Coast Miwok people, who remain an integral part of the community and whose enduring presence calls us to honor their heritage and recognize the lasting impacts of settler colonialism; and
WHEREAS, communities enriched by the diversity of backgrounds, languages, and traditions benefit from shared values, innovation, and cross-cultural exchange. When people come together to acknowledge historical wounds, build understanding, and collaborate, they lay the foundation for inclusive progress and a shared future; and
WHEREAS, many immigrants have had pathways to citizenship, and others have faced multiple barricades to their start or process of pursuing of citizenship, rights, and freedoms, through the systemic challenges of the immigration process and systems; and
WHEREAS, more than 1 in 4 residents of San Rafael were born in another country. The City of San Rafael supports and encourages the community to welcome and embrace new residents who have immigrated here, respect and acknowledge their pathways to this point, and work to better understand each other and the common threads that unite us.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Rafael hereby proclaim June 1 – 30, 2025, as National Immigrant Heritage Month, and encourages all residents to recognize their own heritage, the immigration stories of our families, and the continued need for acceptance and understanding, and that all voices and experiences have a need to be heard, valued, and respected.

Kate Colin
Mayor
City of San Rafael
Proclamation in Recognition of

NATIONAL GUN VIOLENCE AWARENESS DAY
JUNE 6, 2025
WHEREAS, The first Friday in June is declared as National Gun Violence Awareness Day to honor and remember all victims and survivors of gun violence and to declare that as a country, state, city, and individually, we all must do more to educate ourselves on and reduce gun violence; and WHEREAS, gun violence remains a leading cause of death among American children and teens, surpassing motor vehicle accidents. In 2023, over 4,700 children and teens (ages 0–19) were killed by firearms in the United States, accounting for nearly 1 in 10 gun-related deaths nationwide; and WHEREAS, every day, more than 100 Americans are killed by gun violence, and on average, there are more than 13,000 gun-related homicides every year, and Americans are 25 times more likely to die by gun homicide than people in other high-income countries; and
WHEREAS, supporting the Second Amendment and advocating for responsible gun ownership are not mutually exclusive with implementing common-sense measures to prevent gun violence, including universal background checks, safe storage laws, and red flag laws that help keep firearms out of the hands of individuals with dangerous histories; and
WHEREAS, research shows that gun violence is often preceded by warning signs and that effective intervention and support—especially around mental health, domestic violence, and youth conflict—can save lives and prevent further trauma in our communities; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Rafael reaffirms its commitment to ending the epidemic of gun violence and calls on community members, leaders, and lawmakers to take action to reduce firearm-related deaths through education, advocacy, and policy reform. We pledge to promote safe gun storage, support violence intervention programs, and ensure that all San Rafael residents—especially our youth—can live free from the threat of gun violence.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Rafael hereby proclaim June 6, 2025, as National Gun Violence Awareness Day, and does hereby recognize the urgent need to address gun violence as a public health and safety crisis and urges all residents to join in the shared effort to build a safer, stronger, and more resilient community for all.

Kate Colin
Mayor
City of San Rafael
Proclamation in Recognition of

ALZHEIMER'S AND BRAIN AWARENESS MONTH
June 1-30, 2025
WHEREAS, Alzheimer's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that affects millions of individuals worldwide, including community members in San Rafael, and has a lasting impact on the family, friends, and supporters of those with Alzheimer’s; and
WHEREAS, more than 6 million Americans are currently living with Alzheimer's disease, and this number is expected to triple by 2060; and WHEREAS, Alzheimer's disease is the sixth leading cause of death in the United States, and it is the only disease among the top ten causes of death that cannot be prevented or cured; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Rafael recognizes the importance of raising awareness about Alzheimer's disease and other dementias and the need for support and services for individuals and families affected by these conditions; and
WHEREAS, the Alzheimer's Association and other organizations are dedicated to Alzheimer's research and to encouraging all community members to learn more about the signs and symptoms of Alzheimer's disease, seek early diagnosis, and support ongoing research efforts; and WHEREAS, the City of San Rafael supports efforts to increase public awareness, provide education, and promote research to improve the quality of life for individuals living with Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, their caregivers, and the friends and family that support and are impacted by their diagnosis.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Rafael hereby proclaim June as Alzheimer's and Brain Awareness Month and encourage initiatives that promote awareness, education, and support for those affected by Alzheimer's disease and other dementias.

Kate Colin
Mayor
City of San Rafael
Proclamation in Recognition of

LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENDER, QUEER,
INTERSEX, ASEXUAL, PLUS (LGBTQIA+) PRIDE MONTH
JUNE 1 – 30, 2025
WHEREAS, the LGBTQIA+ community encompasses a diverse range of identities, including but not limited to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other gender-diverse individuals, and represents a rich spectrum of lived experiences; and
WHEREAS, June is globally recognized as Pride Month, commemorating the Stonewall Uprising of June 1969, in New York City, which served as a catalyst for the modern LGBTQIA+ rights movement and ignited an enduring push for equity, dignity, and human rights; and
WHEREAS, Pride Month offers an essential opportunity to reflect on significant milestones, celebrate cultural and civic contributions by LGBTQIA+ individuals across sectors, and reaffirm our collective responsibility to advance inclusion, combat bigotry, and secure justice for all; and
WHEREAS, LGBTQIA+ individuals, families, and communities have historically faced and continue to face discrimination, stigma, and violence in various aspects of life, including housing, employment, healthcare, and education; and particularly transgender and nonbinary people continue to experience disproportionately high rates of violence, discrimination, and mental health challenges; and WHEREAS, in 2025, Pride Month embraces the national theme of "Reflect. Empower.

Unite.", encouraging communities to honor the resilience of LGBTQIA+ individuals, empower voices to be heard, and unite efforts toward inclusion and equity for all,
WHEREAS, the rainbow flag, along with the expanded Progress Pride Flag, represents Pride and a continued fight for intersectional equity and visibility for historically marginalized subgroups within the LGBTQIA+ community. The City of San Rafael will observe Pride Month 2025 by raising the Progress Pride Flag and hosting events that uplift LGBTQIA+ voices and foster belonging for all.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Rafael hereby proclaim June 1 – 30, 2025, as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersexual, Asexual, Plus (LGBTQIA+) Pride Month, to inspire equity, create alliances, celebrate diversity, and establish the City as a safe environment, and to unequivocally show this support, directs staff to fly the Progress Pride Flag at City Hall for the entirety of the month of June.

Kate Colin
Mayor
City of San Rafael
Proclamation in Recognition of

JUNETEENTH
June 19, 2025
WHEREAS, Juneteenth, also known as “Freedom Day” or “Emancipation Day,” commemorates June 19, 1865—the day when Union troops arrived in Galveston, Texas, to announce the end of the Civil War and by Executive Order enforce the Emancipation Proclamation, thus ensuring freedom for the last remaining enslaved people in the United States; and WHEREAS, First celebrated in Texas on June 19, 1866, Juneteenth is the oldest nationally observed commemoration of the end of slavery in the United States and was established as a federal holiday on June 17, 2021, with the signing of the Juneteenth National Independence Day Act; and WHEREAS, Juneteenth has grown into a powerful national celebration of African American culture, heritage, and achievement, and serves as a time of acknowledge, reflect, and renew commitment to racial equity and social justice; and
WHEREAS, The City of San Rafel acknowledges the individual and collective trauma inflicted upon enslaved persons and the inherited trauma of their descendants and families; we remember and honor their resilience and strength to continue to move forward against adversity; and WHERAS, a 2025 theme of Juneteenth is “Together We Ride the Juneteenth: Wave of Freedom to Liberty,” highlighting the collective effort and shared journey towards freedom and liberty, emphasizing the importance of unity and shared responsibility in achieving a more equitable society.

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Rafael hereby proclaim June 19, 2025, as Juneteenth, as an official holiday for the City of San Rafael in observance of the emancipation of enslaved persons in the United States and the City reaffirms its commitment to safeguarding the civil rights, safety, and dignity of all its residents.

Kate Colin
Mayor
City of San Rafael
Proclamation in Recognition of
REV. DR. JANE “JANIE” ADAMS SPAHR
WHEREAS, Rev. Dr. Jane Adams Spahr, affectionately known as "Janie," is a Presbyterian minister who has dedicated her life to advocating for justice and equality, particularly for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) community; and
WHEREAS, ordained in December 1974 by the Presbytery of Pittsburgh, Dr. Spahr served as Assistant Pastor at First Presbyterian Church in San Rafael, California, from 1975 to 1979. In 1979, she became Executive Director of the Oakland Council of Presbyterian Churches but was compelled to resign in 1980 upon coming out as a lesbian; and
WHEREAS, in response to institutional exclusion, Dr. Spahr embraced her identity and ministry by serving from 1980 to 1982 as Minister of Pastoral Care at the Metropolitan Community Church in San Francisco's Castro district, providing spiritual support to the LGBTQ+ community; and
WHEREAS, in 1982, she co-founded the Ministry of Light, later known as the Spectrum Center for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Concerns in Marin County, California, where she served as Executive Director for over a decade, establishing vital programs such as the Marin AIDS Project, PFLAG Marin, and youth and family support services; and
WHEREAS, in 1991, Dr. Spahr was called to serve as one of four co-pastors at Downtown United Presbyterian Church in Rochester, New York, but was denied the position by the Presbyterian Church's highest court due to her sexual orientation, leading to the formation of "That All May Freely Serve," an initiative advocating for inclusivity within the church; and WHEREAS, in 2015, the Spectrum Center merged with the Marin AIDS Project to form The Spahr Center, a nonprofit named in her honor, which provided life-saving support services, community education, and advocacy for LGBTQ+ individuals and people living with and affected by HIV in Marin County; and WHEREAS, in 2025, Dr. Spahr has been instrumental in the formation of the Marin LGBTQ+ Center which recently celebrated its opening at the Multicultural Center of Marin; and
WHEREAS, her unwavering dedication to justice, her pioneering role in LGBTQ+ ministry, and her compassionate leadership have inspired countless individuals and contributed significantly to the advancement of civil rights and inclusion within religious communities.

WHEREAS, Dr. Spahr has officiated numerous same-sex marriages, challenging denominational prohibitions and facing ecclesiastical trials, yet remaining steadfast in her commitment to equality and pastoral care; and THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Rafael recognize and honor the Rev. Dr. Jane Adams Spahr for her extraordinary contributions to social justice, her courageous advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights within the faith community, and her enduring legacy of compassion, resilience, and transformative leadership.

Kate Colin
Mayor
____________________________________________________________________________________

FOR CITY CLERK ONLY
Council Meeting:

Disposition:

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Department: City Manager, Sustainability Division
Prepared by: Cory Bytof
Sustainability Program Manager
Jonathan Schellin
Deputy Director, Public Works
City Manager Approval: ___
TOPIC: ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) FLEET ELECTRIFICATION PROGRAM CONTRACT SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND ENTER

INTO CONTRACTS AND SIGN LETTERS OF COMMITMENT WITH PACIFIC GAS

AND ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR THE EV FLEET ELECTRIFICATION PROGRAM FOR CITY FACILITIES; CEQA DETERMINATION: EXEMPT PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTIONS 15311, 15303, AND/OR 15301.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate, enter into contracts, and sign letters of agreement with Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the Electric Vehicle (EV) Fleet Electrification program for City facilities.

BACKGROUND:

San Rafael’s Climate Change Action Plan (CCAP) includes Measure LCT-M1, directing the City to purchase or lease zero-emission vehicles for the City fleet whenever possible. It targets a 50% reduction in fuel use by 2030. Vehicle emissions are the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in our greenhouse gas inventory, and this is the most significant area of greenhouse gas reduction in the CCAP. In addition, the City Council approved an Electric Vehicle Acceleration Strategy Workplan in 2023 that contains priority action items by 2025 to 1) develop a fleet replacement plan that includes activities to convert the City’s fleet to 100% zero-emissions vehicles, inclusive of charging infrastructure and 2) to identify local fire and police conversion of mission-critical and non-emergency fleet vehicles.

In 2023, the California Air Resources Board adopted the Advanced Clean Fleets Regulation for-vehicle fleets, including local government fleets (California Code of Regulations Title 13, Division 3, Chapter 1, Article 3.2). There are purchasing, operations, and reporting requirements in these regulations, some of which the City is currently in compliance. The most significant regulations relate to procurement, as the City will be required to purchase zero emissions vehicles for all medium and heavy-duty fleet vehicles (public safety vehicles exempted):
• Beginning January 1, 2024, 50 percent of annual vehicle purchases per calendar year must be zero-emissions.

Agenda Item No: 4.c
Meeting Date: June 2, 2025
' .
, SAN RAFAEL
l ~ .,, THE CITY WITH A MISSION
established 1874
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 2
• Beginning January 1, 2027, 100 percent of vehicle purchases per calendar year are required to be zero-emissions.

Staff have been working on the transition of the City fleet for the past two years. This includes securing Federal Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grant funds, no-cost technical assistance from Marin Clean Energy (MCE) and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and contracting with a third-party technical consulting team to plan the transition. Staff’s most recent and significant activity was to apply for and get accepted into the Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s (PG&E) EV Fleet Electrification program, which commits Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) to install additional infrastructure to serve electric vehicle loads at City facilities. The program includes PG&E fully funding the utility side of the meter upgrades, financial assistance for the City side of the meter work, and financial incentives for City vehicle purchases. PG&E will also provide technical assistance in identifying and securing additional incentives for the chargers and vehicles. In addition, participating in the PG&E program commits PG&E to prioritizing these projects and expediting the completion of their infrastructure work. This will help the City comply with the advanced clean fleet regulation and save significant transformer and electrical capacity expansion costs.

ANALYSIS:

City staff, PG&E, and the City’s technical consultants have met and developed a plan and preliminary site designs for City facilities. The City has received an offer from PG&E to upgrade electrical facilities to enable the transition of fleet vehicles to electric, particularly our medium and heavy-duty fleet, to achieve compliance with the advanced clean fleet regulations. The City must enter into contracts and sign letters of commitment with PG&E by June 13, 2025, to secure the PG&E commitments and incentives and commence the work described below. This would include committing the City to procure and install ten electric vehicle chargers at the Department of Public Works and an equal number of electric vehicles over the next five years. However, this work will provide infrastructure to serve additional vehicles in subsequent years.

The proposed project in the program includes installing standard Level II chargers and high-power Level III charging equipment to accommodate heavy-duty and public safety vehicles to minimize downtime.

In addition, the City has requested an “oversized load” allotment from PG&E to leverage this installation for the longer-term needs of transitioning more of the fleet in subsequent years. Another benefit of participating in the PG&E program is that the City will be eligible to move to the significantly lower-cost Business EV Rate tariff for electricity use, which it is not currently eligible for. These rates are typically between ¼ and ½ standard electricity rates and would be an ongoing savings to the City. Finally, by proceeding with these contracts, the City could accommodate California’s robust regulations to eliminate internal combustion vehicles by 2035.

If the City were not to enter into contracts and participate in this program, the City would bear the costs of upgrading much of this electrical infrastructure and would lose additional vehicle incentives and expedited construction commitments from PG&E. PG&E’s EV Fleet Program is oversold and projects not contracted soon will be put in wait list status. The contract, letter of agreement, and Oversized Switchgear Acknowledgement. for the program are attached as Attachments 2 and 3.

The City’s consultants estimate costs to the City of approximately $538,900 for the City infrastructure upgrades to the Public Works facility before incentives. These are preliminary estimates, as the design for these upgrades is only at a 10% design stage. The estimate includes contingencies for external factors, including the possibility of tariffs affecting pricing and potential unknown site conditions that could cause complications to paint a worst-case scenario for budgeting purposes.

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 3
Many incentives are available to the City to offset a significant portion of the estimated costs.

Guaranteed incentives from PG&E, MCE, and the Transportation Authority of Marin would contribute $168,000 toward the cost. The City has been awarded another $123,900 from the Federal Government through the Inflation Reduction Act, which would be applied to this project. A mix of other incentives and grants would cover the remaining costs of approximately $247,000.The initial net project cost supported by the Capital Fund (410) is $247,000, with the possibility that this cost may be further reduced pending additional incentives.

Other funding available to the City includes tax incentives through the direct pay provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act, which, if left to stand in Congress, would be estimated to contribute another $107,000 toward the cost. New California Energy Commission (CEC) incentives just released could provide another $100,000 or more. However, these CEC incentives are highly competitive and not guaranteed. In addition, transitioning fleet vehicles to electric will result in annual cost savings for fuel and maintenance on the order of several thousand dollars per year, which will grow over time as more vehicles are transitioned. Finally, through this PG&E program, the City would be eligible to receive up to $40,000 toward vehicle purchases over the next five years.

The incentives are reimbursement-based, meaning the City must fund the project upfront and submit receipts to receive the incentives mentioned in the previous paragraph. Costs for these projects would be built into the proposed Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Improvement Program budget should the City Council approve these contracts.

Other stipulations in the contract and commitment letter include allowing PG&E easements on City property to conduct the work should PG&E determine the need and indemnification of PG&E and their contractors doing the work. Staff will return to the City Council for approval should easements be required. The City must track and submit certain reports over the contract term. Should the City change the site design or modify the number of chargers and capacity needs during the contract term before construction is completed, there could be costs levied by PG&E. The City’s consultants do not anticipate these changes and have extensive experience overseeing other PG&E EV Fleet Electrification program projects.

Environmental Determination
The installation of EV chargers and the transition of the City's fleet to electric vehicles constitute an overall environmental benefit, and PG&E EV Fleet program guidelines do not require CEQA review. EV charging stations are treated as "minor alterations to existing facilities.” They would be classified as construction of minor structures that are accessories to existing facilities since they are being placed in existing parking lots. Therefore, these projects are determined to be categorically exempt under CEQA Guideline 15301 (minor alteration of existing facilities), 15303(e) (appurtenant structure to garages and carports), and/or 15311 (placement of minor structures appurtenant to existing uses).

Conclusion
Participating in this PG&E EV Fleet program is the most cost-effective and impactful option the City could do to meet advanced clean fleet compliance and other State regulations and to accommodate the City’s goal of transitioning the fleet to zero emissions vehicles. PG&E has indicated that this program is oversold and will be closing soon and that agencies without signed contracts will be placed on a waiting list and will not be guaranteed funding. By not participating in this program, the City could incur hundreds of thousands of dollars in added costs to upgrade facilities and procure vehicles and would not be SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 4
eligible for the lower electric rate tariff or PG&E's expedited construction process. In addition, the City would lose out on the oversized load allotment PG&E is offering to accommodate additional charging capacity beyond the five-year contract period.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Adopting this resolution allows the City Manager to enter into contracts with PG&E. These contracts do not include a financial commitment from the City to PG&E under the terms of this agreement. However, entering into this agreement with PG&E would commit the City to procuring and installing electric vehicles and charging equipment over the five-year period of the contract. The electric vehicles are accounted for in the City’s five-year replacement schedule, and the first vehicle would not be purchased until 2027. Procurement for goods and services in support of the City’s participation in the PG&E EV Fleet Electrification program would be done per the City’s Purchasing Policy.

Current estimates for the design, chargers, and installation costs are $538,900 before incentives. These costs would be partially offset by incentives from MCE, PG&E, and the Transportation Authority of Marin, totaling $168,000. The City has also been awarded $123,900 through an Energy Efficiency Conservation Block Grant that would be applied to this project, bringing the total grants and automatic rebates to $291,900. Additional grants and incentives would be sought to offset further costs where possible.

Funding in the amount of $538,900 is being provided for in the final FY 2025-26 capital budget, via appropriations within the Capital Projects Fund (401). These costs are offset by a total of $291,900 in funding secured through grants and incentives. Additional rebates and incentives could further reduce the net cost to the City.

OPTIONS:

The City Council has the following options to consider relating to this item:

1. Adopt the resolution as presented.

2. Adopt the resolution with amendments.

3. Not adopt the resolution.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and enter into contracts and sign letters of agreement with Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the EV Fleet Electrification program for City facilities.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. PG&E Contract and Letter of Commitment for Public Works Facility

3. PG&E EV Fleet Program Oversized Switchgear Acknowledgement for Public Works Facility

4. Preliminary Site Design for Public Works Facility
RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND ENTER

INTO CONTRACTS AND SIGN LETTERS OF COMMITMENT WITH PACIFIC GAS AND

ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR THE EV FLEET ELECTRIFICATION PROGRAM FOR CITY FACILITIES; CEQA DETERMINATION: EXEMPT PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTIONS 15311, 15303, AND/OR 15301.

WHEREAS, the City of San Rafael is required to comply with the Advanced Clean Fleets regulations of the California Air Resources Board; and
WHEREAS, the Advanced Clean Fleet regulations (Title 13, Division 3, Chapter 1, Article

3.2) require transitioning the City fleet to electric or zero emissions vehicles in phases starting in 2024 with a requirement for 50% of fleet purchases to be Zero Emission Vehicles starting in 2024, and 100% of fleet purchases to be Zero Emission Vehicles starting in 2027 with some exceptions; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Rafael has applied for and been accepted into the Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s EV Fleet Electrification program (“Project”); and WHEREAS, Pacific Gas and Electric Company has provided an offer to the City of San Rafael to provide technical assistance, funding, and installation for utility electrical capacity for the Public Works facility at 111 Morphew Street, San Rafael, California; and WHEREAS, Pacific Gas and Electric Company requires contracts and letters of commitment from the City of San Rafael to guarantee their funding and installation of utility upgrades that obligates the City to purchase electric vehicles and purchase and install electric vehicle chargers, as well as to abide by reporting and specification requirements; and WHEREAS, this Project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15301, 15303 and/or 15311 due to the installation of the Project being an accessory to existing facilities and uses since they are being placed in existing parking lots.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Rafael hereby finds the foregoing recitals are true and correct, determines that the project is exempt under CEQA Guideline Sections 15301, 15303 and/or 15311 and authorizes the City Manager to negotiate and enter into contracts and sign letters of commitment with Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the EV Fleet Electrification program for City facilities, including Oversized Switchgear Acknowledgement.

I, LINDSAY LARA, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of San Rafael, held on Monday, the 2nd day of June 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:
_____________________
Lindsay Lara, City Clerk
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
Cover Letter (11.2024 Version) Page 1 of 4
April 24, 2025
City of San Rafael
111 Morphew St
San Rafael, CA 94901
RE: FLEET006994845
Dear Jonathan Schellin,
Congratulations! We are pleased to extend City of San Rafael an invitation to join PG&E’s EV Fleet Electrification program. Upon your completion of the action items below, we will move your project into the design phase and begin the engineering, design and construction plans for 111 Morphew St, San Rafael, CA 94901. Please note, future changes to the project scope may change your eligibility for the program.

Included in this contract are the following items:
• Cover Letter
o Offer Description
o EV Charger Rebate
o Preliminary Design (also attached as PDF)
• Letter of Commitment
o EV Deployment Commitment
• EV Fleet Program Terms and Conditions (“Contract”)
• Exhibit A: Project Scope
• Appendices
o Appendix A: PG&E EV Fleet Program Participant Data Reporting Requirements o Appendix B: CPUC’s Safety Requirements Checklist for CPUC-Approved Transportation Electrification Programs
Immediate Action Items:
• Review the entire document
• Sign and return the Letter of Commitment and Contract • Provide proof of commitment (as defined below) for appropriate vehicles By signing the Letter of Commitment and the Contract, I hereby confirm my participation in PG&E’s Fleet Electrification program and acknowledge that:
• I agree to install the number of EV Supply Equipment (EVSE or “EV charger”) specified in Exhibit A of the Contract;
• Upon execution of the Contract, PG&E will begin incurring design fees and costs as my project moves forward;
• If I withdraw from the program prior to the site being activated, then PG&E reserves the right to recover all fees and costs incurred by it and its subcontractors after the execution of the Contract, including but not limited to, design cost, site walk costs, etc.;
• PG&E may need to conduct a comprehensive design site walk; • If the existing infrastructure or physical site or equipment is substantially different than anticipated or described, then PG&E will make reasonable effort to redesign the project in a manner acceptable to both parties, but reserves the right to cancel my participation in the program; • If I request to make changes to the scope or design of the project, then PG&E reserves the right to recover all costs associated with that change, such as redesign costs; Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
Cover Letter (11.2024 Version) Page 2 of 4
• If I do not submit required documentation (e.g., signed easement) or fail to move this project forward for a period of 90 days or more, then PG&E may consider this an abandonment of this Contract and reserves the right to cancel my participation in the program and recover all costs incurred; and • My EV chargers meet the Safety Checklist requirements and have networking protocols (as described in Appendix A and Appendix B). I agree to ensure that EVSE network connectivity is in good condition for at least five years from the date of activation.

Offer Description
After careful consideration of the project costs and scope of work, PG&E has determined you are eligible for the Make-Ready Incentive Option. PG&E will design, construct, own, and maintain any necessary EV supply infrastructure to the meter only. City of San Rafael will design, build, own, operate, and maintain the EV supply infrastructure behind the meter, hereafter referred to as customer-owned make-ready infrastructure. PG&E provides an incentive that is equal to the lesser amount of either: (i) 80% of the customer-owned make-ready infrastructure costs or (ii) the incentive cap of $40,000.00 as described in the table below. Project documentation should be submitted to your Project Manager within 90 days of site activation to initiate the incentive payment process.

EV Supply Infrastructure Incentive
Applies to Site Hosts who pay for, own, and maintain EV Supply Infrastructure Vehicle Type Per Vehicle Incentive # of Vehicles
School Buses, Local Delivery
Trucks, or Other Vehicles
$4,000.00 per Vehicle 10
Vehicle Type (Total) Incentive (Total) Incentive Total
Total # of Vehicles
10 Lesser amount of either 80% of the
customer-owned make-ready infrastructure
costs or the incentive cap, as described
above, on a per vehicle basis
Maximum of $40,000.00
EV Charger Rebate
You may also qualify for a rebate of up to $174,000.00, capped at 50% of the purchase cost, for qualified EV chargers for your fleet. EV chargers are only eligible for rebates if they are listed on PG&E’s approved EVSE vendor list at the time of installation. All rebate claim documentation must be submitted to PG&E no later than March 31, 2028 to be eligible for rebates. The EV Fleet program will not be able to issue rebates for EV chargers acquired after March 2028.

EV Charger Rebate
Applies to Site Hosts that are transit agencies, schools, or located in disadvantaged communities.

Power output Rebate # of Chargers

16.6 kW 50% of the cost of the charger, up to
$15,000.00 per EVSE
6 196 kW 50% of the cost of the charger, up to
$42,000.00 per EVSE
2 Total 492 kW Total Capped Rebate Amount of up to
$174,000.00
8 As a reminder, to participate in the EV Fleet program, your EV chargers, also known as EV supply equipment, at a minimum must meet the EV Fleet Program Data Reporting requirements outlined in Appendix A and the Safety Checklist requirements outlined in Appendix B. In addition, the EV chargers must at least meet the following network communications requirements:

Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
Cover Letter (11.2024 Version) Page 3 of 4
• Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) shall have metering capability through an internal device and shall be able to measure power and usage parameters to enable reporting of the metrics in the Contractor Requirement section.
• After loss of power, provided the EVSE connector to vehicle has not been removed, the EVSE shall return to its post-configuration state (i.e., shall persist communication and registration configurations.

This does not include continuing user sessions when authorization is required to start a session). • EVSE shall provide a reset option, which returns the device to its pre-charge state (e.g., card or message- not user accessible).

Preliminary Design
The preliminary design for your project is below and has also been provided as a PDF along with this contract.

Please note that any requests to change the scope of the project may result in redesign costs to you of up to $15,000 per request. Examples of changes to scope include requests to modify the number or type of charger being deployed or modify the location of the meter.

PG&E may opt to utilize existing infrastructure, including existing conduit, in order to minimize project costs as indicated by the word “existing” on any components on the Preliminary Design. *If complications arise with the 3rd party easement, the alternative route would be to install a #5 box directly on customer property.

Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
I
I
Ii
r ~=ev\RUST I WRENCEJTR

RT LAWRENCE J
APN·
009-291··12 '
Tf
PJ
r-- UWTS OF WORK
OWNER
SAN RAFAEL CITY OF L/1.. SAN

RAFAEL LANO COMPANY LLC
APN
009-430--01
=~~:: .!, ____ ) . • I 5 ~ -,~ ~/ ~;~ I
' MoR~EW~T- _'=L... • -~ /
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
Cover Letter (11.2024 Version) Page 4 of 4
Next Steps:

We respectfully request that you return your signed contract as soon as possible. After we receive your signed contract, I will introduce you to your Project Manager, who will lead you through the design and construction process for your site.

Thank you for your participation in this exciting program! You are taking an important step to support California’s ambitious climate and air quality goals, and we appreciate that you have elected to work with PG&E to electrify your fleet.

Please contact me if you have any questions.

Regards,
Craig Castro
[email protected]
510.298.7766
Electric Vehicle Customer Onboarding Specialist
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
e v neet

STALL AND STATION COUNT

IMPACTED EXISTING

FLEET STALLS
TOTAL

PROPOSED EV CHARGING

FLEET STALLS
TOTAL

EV CHARGING STATIONS
LEVEL 2 (19.2 KW NOMINAL I 16:6 KW ACTUAL)

SINGLE PORT - PEDESTAL MOUNT
LEVEL 3 (193.7 KW NOMINAL I 196 KW ACTIJAL)

DUAL PORT - PEDESTAL MOUNT
TOTAL

ANTICIPATED LOAD
ZEROVA AX80 @ 16.6 KW
ZEROVA DS180@ 196 KW

CHARGER BANK DEMAND LOAD
(AMPS @ 480V)
~ ~

QUANTITY
10 10

QUANTITY
6 2
8 TOTAL KW

99.6 392
591.3
~
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
EV Fleet Letter of Commitment (11.2024 Version) Page 1 of 1 EV Fleet Program Terms and Conditions (“Contract”)
Between City of San Rafael and Pacific Gas and Electric Company April 24, 2025

Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
Re: Electric Vehicle Deployment Commitment for City of San Rafael (FLEET006994845) Dear Pacific Gas and Electric Company,
City of San Rafael and PG&E have worked together and agreed on a contract under which City of San Rafael purchases electric fleet vehicles and PG&E performs make-ready infrastructure work and, if qualified, provides EV charger rebates and infrastructure incentives.

City of San Rafael has received approval from our internal decision makers and commits to purchase 10 electric vehicles by December 31, 2029. We plan to purchase and deploy the vehicles during the following timeline:

Electric Vehicle Deployment Schedule
Description 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total
Medium Duty Vehicle 4 4 0 2 0 10
By signing the Letter of Commitment and the Contract, City of San Rafael understands that, in accordance with the section titled ‘Vehicle Purchase Plans’, City of San Rafael is responsible for realizing the number and type of EV Fleet vehicles that have been indicated in Exhibit A of the aforementioned Contract regardless of the decision of granting agencies. These vehicles will be domiciled at 111 Morphew St, San Rafael, CA 94901.

If City of San Rafael does not put into operation the number of vehicles stated in the section above, PG&E in its sole discretion may require City of San Rafael to reimburse PG&E for costs incurred by PG&E associated with PG&E’s reliance on my commitment to install infrastructure, such as costs of equipment, site design, and installation.

Sincerely,
Customer Signature1
Signature
City of San Rafael
Company Name
Customer Print
Print
Customer SignedDate1
Date
Customer Title1
Title
Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
Contract version revised 11.2024 Page 1 of 11
EV Fleet Program Terms and Conditions (“Contract”)
Between City of San Rafael and Pacific Gas and Electric Company EV Fleet Program Terms and Conditions (“Contract”)
Definitions
As used in this Contract, the following terms have the following meanings:

Disadvantaged Community: Census tracts in PG&E’s service territory with a top quartile score according to California Environmental Protection Agency’s CalEnviroScreen 3.0.

EV Service Connection: Traditional utility infrastructure from the utility distribution system to the meter, which may include but is not limited to cable, conductors, conduit, transformers, and associated substructures from the utility distribution system. Also referred to as “To the Meter” (TTM) infrastructure.

EV Supply Infrastructure: Infrastructure from the meter (“but not including the meter”) to the parking space, which may include an electrical panel, cable, and conduit necessary to deliver power to the parking space. Also referred to as “Behind the Meter” (BTM) infrastructure.

Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE): Equipment used for charging EVs. The conductors, including the ungrounded, grounded, and equipment grounding conductors, the electric vehicle chargers, connectors, attachment plugs, and all other fittings, devices, power outlets, or apparatuses installed specifically for the purpose of delivering energy from the Premises wiring to the electric vehicle.

EVSE Package: EVSE hardware, software, and network services.

EV Service Provider (EVSP): A company that provides EV charging solutions to Customer, including but not limited to network services, billing, and customer support.

Operation and Maintenance (O&M): O&M includes, but is not limited to, network fees, resetting of breakers, replacement of parts, and associated services necessary to keep the EVSE and/or EV Supply Infrastructure operational.

Premises: Premises includes all of the real property and apparatus employed in a single enterprise on an integral parcel of land undivided, excepting in the case of industrial, agricultural, oil field, resort enterprises, and public or quasi-public institutions, by a dedicated street, highway or public thoroughfare or railway. Automobile parking lots constituting a part of or adjacent to a single enterprise may be separated by an alley from the remainder of the Premises served. All Premises must be reviewed by PG&E to determine where service could be provided and at what cost. PG&E may agree to include some or all of the Premises in the EV Fleet Program. Multiple Premises may be listed in Exhibit A.

Rate Plan: The PG&E electric rate that Customer pays for using EVSE. Detail on PG&E rates and eligibility criteria can be found at www.pge.com/tariffs.

Customer: The entity participating in the EV Fleet Program that owns, leases, or manages the Premises where the EVSE Packages are installed. Customer will receive the bill for the energy delivered to the EVSE Package.

Specific Terms
Acknowledgement and Term: All parties agree to abide by the terms and conditions of this Contract for participation in the EV Fleet Program (part of California Public Utilities Commission, or “CPUC”, Decision Number 18-05-040 issued May 31, 2018), including all requirements included by reference. The duration of this Contract (the “Term”) will commence on the date Customer’s EVSE Package becomes operational and will continue in effect for ten (10) years thereafter (unless otherwise earlier terminated pursuant to the terms herein). PG&E will inform Customer in writing when the EVSE Package becomes operational.

Ownership: Customer has two options for ownership of EV Supply Infrastructure. Ownership of other components is listed below for reference. Sections in this Contract labeled “Customer Owned EV Supply Infrastructure” or “PG&E Owned EV Supply Infrastructure” will apply depending on the ownership option a Customer selects. Customer should indicate their ownership option in the Cover Letter provided to the customer. All other terms are common to both ownership options.

Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
Contract version revised 11.2024 Page 2 of 11
EV Fleet Program Terms and Conditions (“Contract”)
Between City of San Rafael and Pacific Gas and Electric Company EV Service Connection: PG&E always constructs, owns, operates, and maintains the EV Service Connection when necessary. PG&E may opt to utilize existing infrastructure, including customer-owned conduits, in order to minimize project costs. This will be indicated in the accompanying Preliminary Design. In some cases,the customer may opt to use an existing service connection, in which case no work will be completed by PG&E.

EV Supply Infrastructure: Customer may have two options for EV Supply Infrastructure ownership:

1. PG&E Owned: PG&E constructs, owns, and maintains the EV Supply Infrastructure. PG&E covers costs in accordance with CPUC requirements.

2. Customer Owned: Customer is responsible for construction and maintenance of EV Supply Infrastructure and receives an incentive in accordance with CPUC requirements.

EV Supply Equipment (EVSE): Customer always installs, owns, operates, and maintains the EVSE.

Selection of EVSE Package: Upon approval of application by PG&E, Customer shall select and procure an EVSE Package from the PG&E approved product list. PG&E will share approved product list with Customer. Customer shall install, operate, and maintain the number and type of the EVSE Package, associated equipment, and signage as selected by Customer and approved by PG&E. Customer acknowledges that PG&E makes no representations regarding manufacturers, dealers, contractors, materials, or workmanship of the EVSE Package. Customer agrees that PG&E has no liability whatsoever concerning the quality and safety of such EVSE Package. At PG&E sole discretion, Customer may use an EVSE Package that is not on the approved product list. If EVSE Package is not on the approved product list, EVSE Package must be compliant with minimum requirements. These minimum requirements are attached to this Contract, as applicable. In addition to these requirements, EVSE Package must be ISO15118-ready, with the exception of equipment that will be used to charge off-road vehicles. Customer agrees to provide all information requested by PG&E about non-approved EVSE Packages, including but not limited to technical and safety specifications.

EVSE Rebate: Customer may qualify for a rebate of EVSE, in accordance with the CPUC requirements. Rebate amounts will vary in accordance with the CPUC requirements. Rebates will be paid after (1) Customer provides proof of purchase of EVSE Package, (2) at PG&E discretion PG&E inspects the installation of the EVSE and the physical location, and (3) the EVSE is operational. All EVSE rebate claims must be submitted no later than March 31, 2028. Any EVSE acquired after March 2028 will not be eligible for rebate.

Additional Services from EVSP: Separate and apart from the application and PG&E’s obligations under the EV Fleet Program, the EVSP selected by Customer may offer and contract directly with the Customer to provide any additional or complementary services, as long as these services do not interfere with the objectives of the EV Fleet Program as fully described in the CPUC decision. The costs of additional EVSP services, and any cost related to O&M of any additional EVSP services, will not be borne by PG&E, unless they are complementary services necessary to support the EV Fleet Program objectives and are approved by PG&E in writing.

EV Drivers’ Right to Access: Customer shall not restrict access to or use of the EVSE for reasons including, but not limited to, race, color, religion, age, sex, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, or any basis prohibited by applicable law. However, Customer may decide to make the EVSE available only to its employees, tenants, or lessors; under the terms of the EV Fleet Program, Customer decides whether to make the EVSE available to other 3rd parties.

Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
High level EV infrastructure configuration and terminology Utility assets (e.g., power
lines, transformer)
EV Service Connection, or
To The Meter (TTM)
infrastructure
Meter Electric
panel
EV Supply Infrastructure, or
Behind The Meter (BTM)
infrastructure
Charger
EV Supply
Equipment
(EVSE)
Electric Vehicle
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
Contract version revised 11.2024 Page 3 of 11
EV Fleet Program Terms and Conditions (“Contract”)
Between City of San Rafael and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Accessibility Requirements: The installation of the EVSE and EV Service Connection is required to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California Building Standards. Customer understands and accepts that such standards may impact parking layouts and reduce the number of non-accessible parking spaces available. Customer understands and accepts that changes to initial design representations may occur during the design, construction, and operational phases of the EVSE as may be dictated by design constraints, by law or regulation, or by local jurisdictional authorities.

Easement Requirement: An easement may be required to maintain PG&E owned facilities. PG&E will use existing easements when possible to minimize encumbrances on Customer property. If a new easement is required, access rights will follow standard utility requirements for providing electrical service. PG&E will determine if a new easement is required when Customer application is evaluated and will communicate that to Customer. If Customer does not wish to grant an easement for one or more Premises, PG&E may remove those Premises from the EV Fleet program. If Customer accepts easement requirements, Customer agrees to grant PG&E an easement for the installation of EV Service Connection and EV Supply Infrastructure. If the EV Service Connection must cross property owned by a third party to serve Customer, PG&E may, at its option, install such EV Service Connection after appropriate rights of way or easements, satisfactory to PG&E, are obtained without cost to PG&E. Customer is responsible for coordinating attainment of any easements. Customer agrees to sign and return easement to PG&E within 30 days of receipt. If the Customer does not respond within 30 days, PG&E reserves the right to rescind Customer’s participation in the EV Fleet Program and recover all costs incurred. Upon termination of the Contract, PG&E shall upon written demand therefore execute and deliver to Customer a good and sufficient quitclaim of said easement and right of way or such portion thereof conveyed in this document, at Customer expense.

EVSE O&M: The Customer is required to maintain the EVSE for the Term. Customer will pay all O&M costs associated with the EVSE. Customer shall maintain a consistent uptime at the direction of PG&E for EVSE installed. Customer shall maintain the common area improvements immediately surrounding the EVSE in good condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted, and will promptly notify PG&E of any problems it is aware of related to the EVSE. Such maintenance by Customer of the immediately surrounding common areas shall include, but not be limited to, pavement maintenance and snow removal services, if applicable. Uninterrupted service is not guaranteed, and PG&E may interrupt service when necessary to ensure safety or to perform maintenance on PG&E owned infrastructure. PG&E will use reasonable efforts to notify Customer in advance of interruptions to service, planned maintenance, and physical access to Premises. Customer will immediately shut down chargers if there is a safety issue.

Billing: Customer will be the PG&E Customer and will be served according to the applicable Rate Plan. As the Customer, Customer will be responsible for paying the PG&E bill.

Compensation: Under no conditions shall Customer or EV Drivers receive compensation of any kind (including but not limited to: cash, in-kind services, or otherwise) for any duties or requirements provided for in this Contract or for participation in any way as part of the EV Fleet Program, including but not limited to: easements, use of data for lawful purposes, loss of business activity during construction or maintenance activities, or any other inconvenience or loss, without limitation, related to participation.

Changing Rate Plan: Customer may change Rate Plan during the Term but must remain on a retail PG&E rate for the duration of the Term. If Customer switches to a non-retail PG&E rate during the Term, Customer shall bear the full cost and sole expense, as circumstances may dictate, for losses incurred by PG&E on behalf of ratepayers, such as pro-rated costs of equipment, site design, and installation.

Reliability: PG&E does not guarantee uninterrupted service. Customer may pursue options to ensure that any impact to Customer operations from potential loss of power is sufficiently mitigated. Customer is responsible for the cost of any supplemental solutions to improve reliability.

Expansion of EVSE Installation: Customer may add more charging ports to their installation in the future, in accordance with the provisions of CPUC filed tariffs such as Electric Rule 16. Customer must coordinate with PG&E prior to any approved installation extension. Any installations or related work performed outside of EV Fleet program will be at Customer’s expense and its liability.

EVSE Replacement: Customer may replace their EVSE during the Term. Customer must notify PG&E ahead of replacement to ensure infrastructure can accommodate the additional load and new EVSE complies with necessary CPUC requirements for the program. If adequate infrastructure does not exist, Customer must request increased capacity in Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
Contract version revised 11.2024 Page 4 of 11
EV Fleet Program Terms and Conditions (“Contract”)
Between City of San Rafael and Pacific Gas and Electric Company accordance with the provisions of CPUC filed tariffs such as Electric Rule 16. Any replacements will be at Customer’s expense and its liability.

Vehicle Purchase Plans: PG&E will work with Customer to understand its fleet electrification plans and may install infrastructure to support future vehicle purchases. In Exhibit A, Customer will provide the number, type, and charging levels of electric vehicles that will be used at the Premises over time to justify the requested infrastructure. At PG&E discretion, during the Term PG&E may request evidence that Customer is operating these vehicles and associated charging in accordance with its electrification plan. If Customer is not operating vehicles consistent with its electrification plans, at PG&E discretion, Customer may be responsible for PG&E costs associated with installing the excess infrastructure. This includes costs, as circumstances may dictate, for losses incurred by PG&E on behalf of ratepayers, such as costs of equipment, site design and installation. Customer may, at any time within the Term request from PG&E projected and final costs associated with this. If Customer wishes to change its plan, Customer must provide a modified plan to PG&E. This modified plan must be mutually agreed upon by PG&E and Customer. Customer may opt to replace these vehicles with similar equipment but must operate the number and type of vehicles outlined in the electrification plan. Vehicles that are leased must be replaced with similar equipment upon termination of the lease duration.

If Customer is not the party responsible for purchasing or leasing the vehicles indicated in Exhibit A, they will acquire and provide such proof from the responsible party including the number, type, and charging levels of electric vehicles that will be used at the Premises over time to justify the requested infrastructure. Customer is responsible to provide evidence of vehicle operation and associated charging during this term in accordance with the indicated electrification plans. If vehicles are not operating consistent with the indicated electrification plans, at PG&E discretion, Customer may be responsible for PG&E costs associated with installing the excess infrastructure. This includes costs, as circumstances may dictate, for losses incurred by PG&E on behalf of ratepayers, such as costs of equipment, site design, and installation.

Project Scope: Customer acknowledges that:
• Customer agrees to the high-level project scope listed in Exhibit A; • Upon execution of this Contract, PG&E will begin incurring design fees and costs as Customer project moves forward;
• If Customer withdraws from the program, then PG&E reserves the right to recover all fees and costs incurred by it and its subcontractors after the execution of this Contract including, but not limited to, design cost, site walk costs, etc.;
• PG&E will conduct a site walk;
• If the existing infrastructure or physical site or equipment is substantially different than anticipated or described, then PG&E will make reasonable effort to redesign the project in a manner acceptable to both parties, but reserves the right to cancel Customer participation in the program; and • If Customer does not submit required documentation (e.g., signed easement if needed) in a timely manner, then PG&E may grant extensions by request but reserves the right to waitlist Customer application and/or cancel participation in the program.

External Funding Sources: Customer understands that the total infrastructure and EVSE rebate and incentive amounts the Customer receives from all sources, which may include but is not limited to, utilities, state programs, manufacturer, retailer, or otherwise, cannot exceed Customer’s total cost of purchasing the EVSE, installing the EVSE, and constructing the EV Supply Infrastructure.

Customer agrees to keep records of all infrastructure and EVSE incentives and rebates received for Customer’s EV Fleet project. Customer understands that PG&E may request and review said records up to one year after project completion date. If rebates and incentives received exceed incurred project cost, PG&E may inform all other funding sources, which may include but is not limited to, utilities, state programs, manufacturer, retailer, or other, of the violation, including the name of the Customer, a description of the project, and details regarding the excessive rebates and incentives.

Customer Owned EV Supply Infrastructure Section
EV Supply Infrastructure Incentive: Customer qualifies for an incentive towards the cost of EV Supply Infrastructure if they choose to own and maintain the EV Supply Infrastructure. Incentive amounts will vary in accordance with the CPUC requirements. Incentive will be paid after (1) Customer provides proof of actual EV Supply Infrastructure construction cost, (2) EV Supply Infrastructure construction is complete, (3) the EVSE is operational.

Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
Contract version revised 11.2024 Page 5 of 11
EV Fleet Program Terms and Conditions (“Contract”)
Between City of San Rafael and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Installation of EV Service Connection: PG&E and/or its contractors shall design and construct the EV Service Connection in compliance with the terms of this Contract, as well as all applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulatory requirements. Customer is responsible for providing all disclosures, including but not limited to hazardous materials located at the site of the installation. If an easement is required, PG&E will provide a preliminary layout of proposed facilities to Customer prior to preparation of easement for Customer review and approval; such approval will not unreasonably be withheld. The easement will be executed and recorded in favor of PG&E so that PG&E may access the EV Service Connection as needed. It will be the Customer’s responsibility to provide a preliminary design of the EV Supply Infrastructure and associated electrical loads so that PG&E can provide the associated EV Service Connection design. PG&E and Customer will approve final design prior to construction beginning. Once design is approved, no material changes will be made without approval from PG&E and Customer. After the EVSE is operational, Customer may request a copy of “as built” designs, which will be provided by PG&E.

Installation of EV Supply Infrastructure: The Customer and/or its contractors shall construct the EV Supply Infrastructure and install the EVSE in compliance with the terms of this Contract, as well as all applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulatory requirements, including PG&E requirements found at www.pge.com/greenbook. The Customer is responsible for (i) the costs to construct the EV Supply Infrastructure, (ii) the purchase of the EVSE Package, and (iii) installation of the EVSE. After the EVSE is operational, Customer receives incentive for EV Supply Infrastructure in accordance with terms of this Contract.

EV Supply Infrastructure O&M: If Customer owns the EV Supply Infrastructure, Customer is responsible for O&M of the EV Supply Infrastructure for the Term. Customer will pay all O&M costs associated with the EV Supply Infrastructure.

Customer shall maintain the common area improvements immediately surrounding the EV Supply Infrastructure in good condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted, and will promptly notify PG&E of any problems it is aware of related to the EV Supply Infrastructure. Such maintenance by Customer of the immediately surrounding common areas shall include, but not be limited to, pavement maintenance and snow removal services, if applicable. Uninterrupted service is not guaranteed, and PG&E may interrupt service when necessary to ensure safety or to perform maintenance. PG&E will use reasonable efforts to notify Customer in advance of interruptions to service, planned maintenance, and physical access to Premises.

Access to Customers Premises: PG&E shall at all times have the right to enter and leave the Customer’s Premises for any purpose connected with the furnishing of electric service to the EV Service Connection (meter reading, inspection, testing, routine repairs, replacement, maintenance, vegetation management, emergency work, etc.) and the exercise of any and all rights secured to it by law, or under PG&E's applicable tariff schedules. If Customer does not grant PG&E reasonable access to the Premises, then PG&E may deenergize the EV Service Connection until access is granted. PG&E will work closely with Customer to ensure this access does not unreasonably interfere with Customer’s property or operations.

End of Term: At the end of the Term, the Customer will have the following options:

1. Continue operating EVSE and EV Supply Infrastructure o Customer has continued responsibility for O&M of EVSE and EV Supply Infrastructure. o If an easement was required for installation, easement remains in place. o PG&E continues to own EV Service Connection and will treat this under the standard provisions of CPUC filed tariffs such as Electric Rule 16.

2. Stop operating EVSE and EV Supply Infrastructure
o Remove the EVSE and/or EV Supply Infrastructure at Customer’s cost and expense. o If an easement was required for installation, PG&E will deliver a quitclaim for the easement and the easement will be removed.
o PG&E will require access to any energized PG&E facilities. If EV Service Connection serves other load or assets, for example building load or solar, PG&E continues to own EV Service Connection and will treat this under the standard provisions of CPUC filed tariffs such as Electric Rule 16. If EV Service Connection serves only the EVSE installed under this Contract, PG&E will deenergize EV Service Connection and abandon facilities in place.

PG&E Owned EV Supply Infrastructure Section
Installation of Equipment: PG&E and/or its contractors shall design and construct the EV Service Connection and EV Supply Infrastructure in compliance with the terms of this Contract, as well as all applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulatory requirements. Customer is responsible for providing all disclosures, including but not limited to hazardous materials located at the site of the installation. If an easement is required, PG&E will provide a preliminary layout of proposed facilities to Customer prior to preparation of easement for Customer review and approval; such approval will not Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
Contract version revised 11.2024 Page 6 of 11
EV Fleet Program Terms and Conditions (“Contract”)
Between City of San Rafael and Pacific Gas and Electric Company unreasonably be withheld. The easement will be executed and recorded in favor of PG&E so that PG&E may access the EV Service Connection and EV Supply Infrastructure as needed. After Customer approval of the preliminary design, PG&E will coordinate with the Customer if there are any proposed material changes. A final design with no material changes from the agreed upon design will be provided by PG&E prior to any installation activities. PG&E and Customer will approve final design prior to construction beginning. Once design is approved, no material changes will be made without approval from PG&E and Customer. An estimated installation schedule shall be provided by PG&E after execution of required easement and timely selection of EVSE Package. Should the installation schedule require modification, PG&E shall notify Customer within a reasonable amount of time of such changes. PG&E is responsible for the costs to construct the EV Supply Infrastructure. The Customer is responsible for (i) the purchase of the EVSE Package and (ii) installation of the EVSE. Upon completion of installation of the EVSE, the Customer understands and acknowledges that it will be responsible for the O&M of the EVSE installed through the EV Fleet Program. After the EVSE is operational, Customer may request a copy of “as built” designs, which will be provided by PG&E.

EV Supply Infrastructure O&M: If PG&E owns the EV Supply Infrastructure, PG&E is responsible for O&M of the EV Supply Infrastructure for the Term. PG&E will pay all O&M costs associated with the EV Supply Infrastructure. Customer shall maintain the common area improvements immediately surrounding the EV Supply Infrastructure in good condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted, and will promptly notify PG&E of any problems it is aware of related to the EV Supply Infrastructure. Such maintenance by Customer of the immediately surrounding common areas shall include, but not be limited to, pavement maintenance and snow removal services, if applicable. Uninterrupted service is not guaranteed, and PG&E may interrupt service when necessary to ensure safety or to perform maintenance. PG&E will use reasonable efforts to notify Customer in advance of interruptions to service, planned maintenance, and physical access to Premises.

End of Term: At the end of the Term, the Customer will have the following options:

1. Continue operating EVSE
o Customer has continued responsibility for O&M of EVSE. o If an easement was required for installation, easement remains in place. o PG&E continues to own EV Service Connection and EV Supply Infrastructure and will treat these under the standard provisions of CPUC filed tariffs such as Electric Rule 16.

2. Stop operating EVSE
o Remove the EVSE at Customer’s cost and expense.
o If an easement was required for installation, PG&E will deliver a quitclaim for the easement and the easement will be removed.
o PG&E will require access to any energized PG&E facilities. If EV Service Connection and/or EV Supply Infrastructure serves other load or assets, for example solar, PG&E continues to own EV Service Connection and/or EV Supply Infrastructure and will treat these under the standard provisions of CPUC filed tariffs such as Electric Rule 16. If EV Service Connection and/or EV Supply Infrastructure serves only the EVSE installed under this Contract, PG&E will deenergize EV Service Connection and EV Supply Infrastructure and abandon facilities in place.

General Terms
Permission to Use Data: Customer agrees to allow PG&E and its agents and representatives to use data gathered as part of the EV Fleet Program (including usage data from the EVSE and EVSE performance data supplied directly to PG&E from the EVSP) (“Usage Data”) for use in regulatory reporting, ordinary business use, industry forums, case studies, or other similar activities, in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Usage Data furnished to PG&E by the EVSP will not include any personal information as defined for the purposes of California privacy laws (including the California Privacy Rights Act, as amended(“CPRA”)). Any such personal data will be deidentified (as defined by CPRA) before it is provided to PG&E. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Customer acknowledges that PG&E is required to disclose location data at census tract or 5-digit zip code level as part of its regulatory obligations to report aggregate data. Although such locations will not be identified as Customer locations in the aggregated and anonymous data disclosed by PG&E, a third party could potentially associate Customer with disclosed locations by reference to other facts and data sources.

Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
Contract version revised 11.2024 Page 7 of 11
EV Fleet Program Terms and Conditions (“Contract”)
Between City of San Rafael and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Representations: Customer understands that its participation in EV Fleet Program shall not be construed as creating any agency, partnership, or other form of joint enterprise between the Customer, PG&E, or their affiliates, contractors, vendors, representatives, or designees, nor create any obligations or responsibilities on their behalf except as may be expressly granted in writing, nor make any representations of any kind to this effect. Customer represents and warrants that it is either (i) the fee title owner and has the ability to grant an easement (if required), or (ii) it is the authorized manager of the proposed EV Fleet Program site working with the fee title owner, it has the power, authority, and capacity to bind itself to undertake the EV Fleet Program terms and conditions and to perform each and every obligation required of Customer, and such fee title owner has the ability to grant an easement (if needed).

Changes: PG&E may initiate changes to the EV Fleet Program as necessary to comply with CPUC directives. PG&E shall endeavor to provide Customer with advance notice of any such changes. Customer has the option to opt out of the Program subject to section “Customer Removal or Termination” below.

Compliance with Laws: All parties shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes, rules, regulations, laws, orders, and decisions that relate to or govern its participation in the EV Fleet Program and/or Customer’s interactions with customers in connection with the EV Fleet Program.

Failure to Comply with Terms and Conditions: Without limitation, and to the greatest extent allowed by law, PG&E and Customer reserve the right to seek damages and recovery for losses incurred due to any breach of this Contract on the part of Customer or PG&E, whether intentional or unintentional.

Relocations: Should Customer request relocation of EVSE or parts thereof, such relocation shall be per mutually agreeable terms and shall be at sole expense of Customer and in accordance with any EV Fleet Program requirements, laws, regulations, or other applicable jurisdictional requirements. Additionally, if applicable and requested by PG&E, Customer shall either amend the easement to include the legal description of the new location or enter into a new easement with PG&E.

PG&E Termination or Suspension: PG&E may terminate, or for any duration suspend, Customer’s participation in the EV Fleet Program, with or without cause, at any time, and for any reason, with reasonable advance notice. Such reasons may include but are not limited to failure to provide or maintain terms of easement, failure to abide by EV Fleet Program terms and conditions, permitting issues, exceptional installation costs, environmental concerns, or any other reason(s) not in the best interests of the EV Fleet Program or PG&E’s ratepayers.

Customer Removal or Termination: Should Customer request removal or termination of EVSE or parts thereof prior to expiration of the Term, then Customer shall bear the full cost and sole expense of such removal as well as all fees and costs, as circumstances may dictate, for losses incurred by PG&E on behalf of ratepayers, such as pro-rated costs of equipment, site design, and installation. Customer may, at any time within the Term, request from PG&E projected and final costs associated with such a removal request. Such costs will include all amounts paid by PG&E, divided equally over a tenyear period (e.g., if amounts total $100k and Customer leaves after 1 year it is responsible for $90k). If the Customer wishes to assign its rights and obligations of this Contract to a new Customer prior to the expiration of the Term, the new Customer may assume all rights and obligations for the remaining Term with PG&E consent. Such consent not to be unreasonably withheld.

Indemnification: Customer shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend PG&E, its affiliates, subsidiaries, parent company, officers, managers, directors, agents, and employees, from and against all claims, demands, losses, damages, costs, expenses, and liability (legal, contractual, or otherwise), which arise from or are in any way connected with any: (i) injury to or death of persons, including but not limited to employees of PG&E or Customer; (ii) injury to property or other interests of PG&E, Customer, or any third party; (iii) violation of a local, state, or federal common law, statute, or regulation, including but not limited to environmental laws or regulations; or (iv) strict liability imposed by any law or regulation; so long as such injury, violation, or strict liability (as set forth in (i) - (iv) above) arises from or is in any way connected with Customer’s performance of, or failure to perform, this Contract. This indemnification obligation shall not apply to the extent that such injury, loss, or damage is caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of PG&E, its officers, managers, or employees.

Customer shall, on PG&E's request, defend any action, claim, or suit asserting a claim which might be covered by this indemnity, using counsel acceptable to PG&E. Customer shall pay all costs and expenses that may be incurred by PG&E in enforcing this indemnity, including reasonable attorney's fees. To the extent necessary, each Party was represented by counsel in the negotiation and execution of this Contract. PG&E represents and warrants that it has indemnification language in its contract with any third party who PG&E may send to perform work on Customer’s physical site. PG&E Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
Contract version revised 11.2024 Page 8 of 11
EV Fleet Program Terms and Conditions (“Contract”)
Between City of San Rafael and Pacific Gas and Electric Company agrees to work closely with Customer on any concerns that may arise related to the party who will perform work on Customer’s physical site.

Insurance Requirements: Customer shall procure, carry, and maintain the following insurance coverage, and Customer is also responsible for its Subcontractors maintaining sufficient limits of the appropriate insurance coverage:

A. Personal Liability

1. The limit shall not be less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) each occurrence for bodily injury, property damage and personal injury.

2. Coverage shall: a) By "Additional Insured" endorsement add as insureds PG&E, its directors, officers, agents, and employees with respect to liability arising out of work performed by or for the Customer; b) Be endorsed to specify that the Customer insurance is primary and that any insurance or self-insurance maintained by PG&E shall not contribute with it.

B. Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability

1. Workers’ Compensation insurance or self-insurance indicating compliance with any applicable labor codes, acts, laws, or statutes, state or federal, where Customer performs Work.

2. Employers’ Liability insurance shall not be less than $1,000,000 for injury or death in each accident.

C. Commercial General Liability

1. Coverage shall be at least as broad as the Insurance Services Office (ISO) Commercial General Liability Coverage “occurrence” form, with no coverage deletions.

2. The limit shall not be less than $1,000,000 each occurrence for bodily injury, property damage and personal injury.

3. Coverage shall: a) by “Additional Insured” endorsement add as insureds PG&E, its affiliates, subsidiaries, and parent company, and PG&E’s directors, officers, agents, and employees with respect to liability arising out of or connected with the Work performed by or for the Customer. (ISO Form CG2010 or equivalent is preferred.) In the event the Commercial General Liability policy includes a “blanket endorsement by contract,” the following language added to the certificate of insurance will satisfy PG&E’s additional insured requirement: “PG&E, its affiliates, subsidiaries, and parent company, and PG&E’s directors, officers, agents, and employees with respect to liability arising out of the work performed by or for the Customer are additional insureds under a blanket endorsement.”; b) be endorsed to specify that the Customer’s insurance is primary and that any insurance or selfinsurance maintained by PG&E shall not contribute with it.

D. Documentation Requirements

1. Customer shall have all insurance in place before beginning any Work. Upon request, Customer shall furnish PG&E with certificates of insurance, declaration pages and endorsements (collectively, “Documentation”) of all required insurance. Documentation shall be signed and submitted by a person authorized by that insurer to issue certificates of insurance and endorsements on its behalf.

2. The insurer shall deliver notification to PG&E in accordance with the policy provisions if any of the abovedescribed policies are cancelled before the stated expiration date.

3. PG&E may inspect the original policies in Sections A or B or require copies at any time. Customer/Owner may redact non-essential exposure information from copies.

4. The minimum liability insurance requirements established in this Contract are not a representation by PG&E that the insurance limits are sufficient, nor do these requirements in any way limit Customer’s liability under this Contract.

5. Upon request, Customer shall furnish PG&E the same evidence of insurance for its Subcontractors as PG&E requires of Customer.

Dispute Resolution: After attempting in good faith to resolve a dispute, a party may request mediation by written notice to the other Party. The mediation shall be conducted by a mutually-agreeable mediator with appropriate experience. All negotiations and any mediation conducted pursuant to this provision are confidential and shall be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations, to which Section 1119 of the California Evidence Code shall apply, and Section 1119 is incorporated herein by reference.

No Partnership: This Contract shall not be construed as creating a partnership, joint venture, agency relationship, franchise, or association, nor shall this Contract render PG&E and Customer liable as partners, co-ventures, or principals.

Enforceability: If any of the provisions, or application of any of the provisions, of this Contract are held to be illegal or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, PG&E and Customer shall negotiate an equitable adjustment in the provisions of Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
Contract version revised 11.2024 Page 9 of 11
EV Fleet Program Terms and Conditions (“Contract”)
Between City of San Rafael and Pacific Gas and Electric Company this Contract with a view toward effectuating the purpose of this Contract. The illegality or invalidity of any of the provisions, or application of any of the provisions, of this Contract will not affect the legality or enforceability of the remaining provisions or application of any of the provisions of the Contract.

Integration: This Contract, including all items incorporated herein by reference, constitutes the entire agreement and understanding between the parties as to the subject matter of the Contract. It supersedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements, commitments, representations, writings, and discussions between parties, whether oral or written, express or implied, that relate in any way to the subject matter of this Contract. This Contract has been induced by no representations, statements, or agreements other than those expressed herein. Neither party shall be bound by any prior or contemporaneous obligations, conditions, warranties, or representations with respect to the subject matter of this Contract.

Survival: The provisions of this Contract, which by their nature should survive expiration, cancellation, or other termination of this Contract, including but not limited to provisions regarding warranty, indemnity, insurance, confidentiality, document retention, business ethics, and availability of information, shall survive such expiration, cancellation, or other termination.

Notice: Any and all notices shall be in writing and addressed to the parties at the addresses specified below or such other addresses as either party may direct by notice given in accordance with this section and shall be delivered in one of the following manners: (i) by personal delivery, in which case notice shall be deemed to have been duly given when delivered; (ii) by certified mail, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, in which case notice shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date indicated on the return receipt; or (iii) by reputable delivery service (including by way of example and not limitation Federal Express, UPS and DHL) which makes a record of the date and time of delivery, in which case notice shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date indicated on the delivery service’s record of delivery.

If to PG&E:

Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Attn: EV Fleet Program Manager
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
Email Address: [email protected]
If to Customer:

Customer CompanyInput (Company Name)
Customer AddressInput (Street Address)
Customer CityZipInput (City, Zip)
Customer NameInput (Name)
The Parties have executed this Contract on the dates indicated below, to be effective upon the later date.

City of San Rafael
Company Name
PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric Company
PG&E Company Name
Customer Signature2
Signature
PG&E Signature
Signature
Customer Print2
Print
PG&E Print
Print
Customer Title2
Title
PG&E Title
PG&E Contract Signer Title
Customer SignedDate2
Date
PG&E SignedDate
Date
Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
Contract version revised 11.2024 Page 10 of 11
EV Fleet Program Terms and Conditions (“Contract”)
Between City of San Rafael and Pacific Gas and Electric Company

EXHIBIT A

PROJECT SCOPE
111 Morphew St, San Rafael, CA 94901
Vehicle Summary
Description 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total
Medium Duty Vehicle 4 4 0 2 0 10
Charger (EVSE) Summary
Description 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total

16.6 kW
4 2 0 0 0 6 EVSEs
196 kW
2 0 0 0 0 2 EVSEs
Anticipated Load (kW) 458.4 kW 33.2 kW 0 kW 0 kW 0 kW 492 kW Please note that your project was scoped based on the make, model, and power level of your EV chargers, as described in the preliminary design. Changes to your EV charger selection may impact the charger load of your project. If you would like to change your charger selection, please consult with your Project Manager before charger purchase so they can ensure the alternative chargers will be compatible with your project’s design. PG&E reserves the right to recover additional costs associated with any changes you request to your project scope.

Service Description
Main Service Size (Amps) 2500 (over-sized)
Voltage and Phase 277/480V Three Phase
Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612
Contract version revised 11.2024 Page 11 of 11
EV Fleet Program Terms and Conditions (“Contract”)
Between City of San Rafael and Pacific Gas and Electric Company Max Load Table
Customer must adhere to the load profile provided below. If the customer desires to increase their load or modify their hours of use, an application must be submitted to PG&E’s Service Planning department. Failure to meet these guidelines may jeopardize reliable operation of the electric system. If EV charging exceeds these values and causes damage to PG&E facilities, the customer will be financially liable for the cost of repairs.

Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
Cumulat ive ti of Vehicles Deployed:

Cumulative ti of Chargers Installed:

Cumulative Charging Equipment Load
Installed (kW):

Hour Starting At (24 hours)
0:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
2024
kW Max Load
2025 I
4x MD Vehicle
2x 196 kW
4x 16.6 kW
458
kW Max Load
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 458
0 ~
458
2026 2027 I 2028
8x MD Vehicl e 8x MD Vehicle lOx MD Vehicles
2x 196 kW 2x 196 kW 2x 196 kW
6x 16.6 kW 6x 16.6 kW 6x 16.6 kW
492 492 492
kW Max Load kW Max Load kW Max Load
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
492 492 492
~
492 ~ 492 ~ 492
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612

Page 1 of 2 ends

Appendix A
Appendix A

PG&E EV FLEET PROGRAM PARTICIPANT DATA REPORTING REQUIREMENTS EV Fleet program participants are required to provide site, equipment, and utilization data for at least 5 years from the time chargers are operational. Sites are required to install chargers with Application Program Interface (API) communication capability.

Below are the data and metrics that may be collected by PG&E through the API. PG&E will contact EVSPs after EVSEs are activated to initiate API testing. Upon activation, Customer must give consent to their EVSP to provide API data to PG&E and its agents and representatives.

Customer agrees to receive and respond to customer surveys throughout the project lifecycle including postinstallation, upon request of PG&E or an associated party.

Off-road vehicles: Sites with off-road vehicles are excluded from API requirements but must install a separate meter that is dedicated for EV charging. In addition, due to the need for PG&E to report charger usage data to the CPUC, no form of generation or distributed generation (including solar and battery storage) may be installed onto this meter panel until five years after the date of project activation.

Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612

Page 2 of 2 ends

Appendix A
Table 1. Data collected from API
Category Metrics
Site
• Pricing Structure ($/kWh, $/hour, subscription, free, flat fee, other) (for public charging stations only)
• Street Address
• City
• State
• Zip Code
Equipment
• EVSE Manufacturer
• EVSE Model
• EVSE Model number
• EVSE Serial Number
• EVSE ID (for public charging stations only)
• Demand Max (Maximum rated kW for each EVSE)
• Number of ports on associated EVSE
• Gateway or non-gateway
Sessions
Data for each charging session that
occurs at the site
• Maximum rated kW of each port
• Start date and time of session
• End date and time of session
• Equipment outages
• Reason for outage
• Date and time of when outage started
• Date and time of when outage ended
• Number of kWh consumed during the session
• Average demand (kW) per session
• Maximum demand (kW) per session
• Total dollar amount charged to the driver for the charging session (for public charging stations only)
• Demand charge ($/kW) (for public charging stations only) • Payment type (for public charging stations only)
• Anonymous unique driver ID for each driver/user
• Vehicle Make
• Vehicle Model
• Vehicle Year
• Vehicle Type (BEV, PHEV)
Session Intervals
15-minute interval data for each
charging session
• Start date and time of interval
• End date and time of interval
• Number of kWh consumed during the session interval
• Average demand (kW) per session interval
• Maximum demand (kW) per session interval
Port Intervals
15-minute interval data for each port
each day (96 intervals/port/day)
• Start date and time of interval
• End date and time of interval
• Number of kWh consumed during the interval
• Average demand (kW) per interval
• Maximum demand (kW) per interval
Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
300 Lakeside Drive
Oakland, CA 94612

Page 1 of 4 ends

Appendix B
Appendix B
CPUC’S SAFETY REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST FOR CPUC-APPROVED

TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION PROGRAMS
Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
Transportation Electrification Safety Requirements Checklist D.18-01-024/D.18-05-040

Page 2 of 4 ends

Appendix B

SAFETY REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST FOR CPUC-APPROVED

TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION PROGRAMS
[Note: Each sponsoring utility must ensure that the following Pre-construction, Construction, and Operational standards are met and report on their compliance at quarterly Program Advisory Council meetings. These requirements are the minimum safety precautions the utilities should meet.] Terminology Defined1
Acronym Definition
EV Electric Vehicle
UL Underwriters Laboratory
EVSE Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment safely connects the AC electricity grid at a site to the EV. Sometimes used more broadly to refer to the charging equipment, not including the make- ready infrastructure or other charging
infrastructure. May include multiple connectors to charge several EVs or to serve EVs with different types of
connectors (e.g., SAE CCS and CHAdeMO)
SAE Society of Automotive Engineers
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
AHJ Authority Having Jurisdiction, as defined by Article 100 of the 2017 National Electric Code: An organization, office, or individual responsible for enforcing the requirements of a code or standard, or for approving equipment, materials, an installation, or a procedure.2
J-1772 Standard An SAE standard for electrical and physical interface to facilitate a safe connection from the EVSE for conductive charging
1 See D.18-01-024 at Appendix A.
2 2017 NEC Article 100, Definitions, includes an informational note regarding AHJ: “The phrase ‘authority having jurisdiction’ or its acronym AHJ, is used in National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) documents in a broad manner, since jurisdictions and approval agencies vary, as do their responsibilities. Where public safety is primary, the authority having jurisdiction may be a federal, state, local, or other regional department or individual such as a fire chief; fire marshal; chief of a fire prevention bureau, labor department, or health department; building official; electrical inspector; or others having statutory authority. For insurance purposes, an insurance inspection department, rating bureau, or other insurance company representative may be the authority having jurisdiction. In many circumstances, the property owner or his or her designated agent assumes the role of the authority having jurisdiction; at government installations, the commanding officer or departmental official may be the authority having jurisdiction.” Transportation Electrification Safety Requirements Checklist D.18-01-024/D.18-05-040

Page 3 of 4 ends

Appendix B
Acronym Definition
Level 1 Charging Charging via AC electrical connection at 120 volts and up to 16 amps, or 1.9 kW.

Level 2 Charging Charging via AC electrical connection at 208 volts or 240 volts at up to 80 amps.

DC Fast Charging Charging via DC electrical connection using off-board AC/DC equipment at a fast rate. Not all EVs have this connector.

CHAdeMO and/or CCS Charging Connector
Standards
There are three types of standard charging connectors for Direct Current Fast Charging. Vehicles capable of DC fast charging will have one of these ports on the vehicle. Other nonstandard connectors include Tesla and BYD. Most public DCFC currently deployed in California includes standard CHAdeMO and/or CCS Type 1 charging connectors.

IOU(s) Investor Owned Utility(ies)
EVITP Training The Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Training Program provides electricians with training for the installation of EVSE. EVITP is a collaboration of industry stakeholders, including automakers, EVSE manufacturers, educational institutions, utility companies, and electric industry professionals. More information is available at https://evitp.org.

NRTL Nationally Recognized Testing Lab
Pre-construction: These EV charging equipment safety requirements must be specified in procurement documents:

1. Charging equipment must be certified by a Nationally Recognized Testing Lab (NRTL).

2. Infrastructure must comply with applicable safety performance requirements associated with the type of TE infrastructure being installed.
• For light-duty vehicles, compliance with the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) J-1772 Standard for Level 1 or Level 2 charging. Compliance with CHAdeMO and CCS for DC fast charging would be appropriate evidence of compliance with this requirement. • For other types of TE infrastructure, including any non-standardized EVSE, the following basic connector safety measures will be required:
• A passing EVSE safety performance evaluation report performed by a Nationally Recognized Testing Lab (NRTL);
• When not connected, the vehicle inlet and the EVSE connector must be designed to prevent direct contact with any live components;
• The vehicle inlet and EVSE connector shall be free of sharp edges and potentially injurious protrusions; • The coupler between the vehicle and the EVSE should avoid or mitigate any potentially hazardous conditions such as fires, electrical shock to users, or other personal injuries.

3. Infrastructure and its planned installation must comply with California Electrical Code Article 625.1

4. Infrastructure and its planned installation must comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and California Building Code Chapter 11B, 2 if applicable, per the AHJ where the EVSE will be installed, unless the appropriate waiver is obtained from local authorities. 2 California Electrical Code Article 625 covers Electric Vehicle Charging System safety and standards as installed in place.

California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Article 625.
3 California Building Code Chapter 2 includes definition associated with electric vehicle charging stations. CBC Chapter 11B defines requirements for ‘Accessibility to Public Buildings, Public Accommodations, Commercial Buildings, and Public Housing.’
Transportation Electrification Safety Requirements Checklist D.18-01-024/D.18-05-040

Page 4 of 4 ends

Appendix B

5. Outdoor-mounted EVSE must be rated to be installed for outdoor use.

6. For utility infrastructure work on the customer side of the meter, contractors must provide proof of EVITP Certification prior to construction.

7. Contractors must provide the utility proof of a full site assessment, including the appropriate load calculations to ensure existing infrastructure can accommodate additional EV load, or that appropriate infrastructure upgrades will be completed.

During Construction:

1. All utility infrastructure work on the customer side of the meter not performed by employees of the IOUs shall be performed by fully licensed electricians. For commercial installations, all electrical contractors should hold a valid C-10 contractor’s license.

2. Installations will be designed per Article 625 of the California Electrical Code.

Operational Safety:

1. Overcurrent protection associated with utility transformers and distribution circuits that feed power to the charging stations.

2. Overcurrent protection in the meter pedestal/circuit breaker panel that feeds each of the charging stations.

3. Bollard equipment protection installed where appropriate as defined by utility design standards and AHJ requirements.

4. Concrete parking stops to protect equipment where appropriate as defined by utility design standards and AHJ requirements.

Clean Energy Transportation
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
77 Beale Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
EV Fleet Oversized Switchgear Acknowledgement (4.15.2022 Version) Page 1 of 1 Internal
December 12, 2024
PG&E’s EV Fleet Program Oversized Switchgear Acknowledgement PG&E’s EV Fleet Program has agreed to allow City of San Rafael (FLEET006994845) to install a switchgear that exceeds the load outlined in Exhibit A of the EV Fleet Contract. PG&E will agree to adjust its EVSE Supply Infrastructure to accommodate the increased switchgear capacity, at PG&E’s expense to be paid out of EV Fleet Program funds, on the terms set forth below.

By signing this document, City of San Rafael (FLEET006994845) acknowledges the following:

1. The additional switchgear capacity must solely be used for the purpose of supplying power to future electric vehicle charging load as dictated by the California Public Utilities Commission in Decision 18- 05-040. If the Customer fails to comply with this guidance, PG&E in its sole discretion may require the Customer to reimburse PG&E for additional costs incurred by PG&E to accommodate the larger switchgear, such as costs of equipment and installation, that PG&E determines were not eligible for EV Fleet Program funding.

2. PG&E will only energize the capacity required to supply the charging load required for EV charging as outlined in Exhibit A of the Contract. Future service capacity expansion requests must be made directly to PG&E’s Service Planning department. Such expansions are not funded by the EV Fleet Program, and consequently any additional service capacity equipment, installations or related work performed outside of the EV Fleet Program will be at the Customer’s expense and its liability.

3. The cost of the switchgear is not eligible for EV Supply Infrastructure Incentives and will be excluded from any incentive calculations.
________________________________
Signature
________________________________
Company Name
________________________________
Print Name
________________________________
Date
________________________________
Title
Pacific Gas and
Electric Company·
____________________________________________________________________________________

FOR CITY CLERK ONLY
Council Meeting:

Disposition:

Agenda Item No: 4.d
Meeting Date: June 2, 2025

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Department: Finance / Library
Prepared by: Paul Navazio, Finance Director City Manager Approval: ________ Jinder Banwait, Administrative Analyst
TOPIC: LIBRARY PARCEL TAX RATE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
SUBJECT: REPORT ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL RATE ADJUSTMENT FOR THE SPECIAL LIBRARY SERVICES PARCEL TAX FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 AS AUTHORIZED BY SAN RAFAEL MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 3.36 (VOTERAPPROVED MEASURE D) RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council accept the report concerning the San Rafael Special Library Services Parcel Tax rate adjustment for Fiscal Year 2025-26, from July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2026, based upon the Consumer Price Index (CPI) in accordance with Section 3.36.030 of the San Rafael Municipal Code.

BACKGROUND:

On June 7, 2016, San Rafael voters approved Measure D, amending the San Rafael Municipal Code (SRMC) Chapter 3.36 by extending, revising, and increasing the existing Special Library Services Parcel Tax (“Tax”). The approved Measure D tax rates were first assessed for the Fiscal Year 2017-18 and levied for nine (9) years, expiring at the end of the upcoming fiscal year (FY 2025-26). The measure provides for an annual CPI adjustment commencing with the second year of the tax.

ANALYSIS:

SRMC section 3.36.030, “Imposition of the Tax,” stipulates that an annual adjustment to the Tax rate shall be applied commencing in the second year based on the annual percentage increase, if any, in the previous fiscal year to the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Price Index for All Urban Consumers ("CPI"), not to exceed 3 percent annually.

Utilizing the Bureau of Labor Statistics - Western CPI Summaries (BLS-WS) for the San FranciscoOakland-Hayward, CA, All Urban Consumers Index, the April 2023 Index was 351.247, and the April 2024 Index was 355.707, resulting in a year-over-year change of 1.27 percent.

Based on this result, the annual rate adjustment for the Library Parcel Tax is determined by the change in the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA, All Urban Consumers Index of 1.27 percent. Adjusting the Library Parcel Tax rate by 3 percent results in the following tax rate schedule:

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 2
Section 3.36.030 Imposition of Tax:

Parcel Rate Types FY 2024-25 Rates
FY 2025-26 Rates
with CPI Adjustment
Single-family residential Parcel $71.12 $73.20
Multi-Family Residential or Other
Residential Parcel
$71.12 + $12.04 per
Living unit, in excess of
one, up to a maximum of
$1,206.70 per year per
parcel
$73.20 + $12.41 per
Living unit, in excess of
one, up to a maximum of
$1,242.90 per year per
parcel
Non-Residential Parcel $71.12 $73.20
Any additional funds generated by this rate adjustment will be used in accordance with Measure D's language to "maintain library hours, equipment, materials, and services for children, teens, and adults." Additionally, any revenue increase will help offset the annual decrease in revenue due to the increasing number of senior exemptions filed for the Tax.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The current fiscal year 2024-25 tax revenues generated by this assessment are estimated at $1,196,757.

Applying the 1.27 percent rate adjustment to FY 2025-26, tax revenues are estimated to be $1,211,956, representing an increase of $15,199. All revenues generated by this assessment are recorded in the Library Special Assessment Special Revenue Fund (215).

Absent future increases to the Library Parcel Tax rates assessed within the City, the Library Special Assessment Special Revenue Fund will not be able to sustain this level of support towards the cost of library services, which could lead to reductions in service levels, if an increase to the Library Parcel Tax is not supported by the voters.

OPTIONS: The City Council has the following options to consider on this matter:

1. Accept the report.

2. Direct staff to return with more information.

3. Take no action.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

FOR CITY CLERK ONLY
Council Meeting:

Disposition:

Agenda Item No: 4.e
Meeting Date: June 2, 2025

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Department: Fire
Prepared by: Abe Roman, Fire Chief
Thomas Wong, Sr. Mgmt. Analyst II
City Manager Approval: ______________
TOPIC: AMBULANCE SERVICE COST RECOVERY AGREEMENT
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS ALLOWING THE SAN RAFAEL FIRE DEPARTMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A MEDICAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRANSFER (IGT) PROGRAM WITH THE CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES (DHCS) AND KAISER FOR THE SERVICE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2024 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2024 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The proposed agreement for participation in a Medi-Cal Intergovernmental Transfer (IGT) for the service period of January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024, represents the 11th year of the City’s participation in the IGT program. The IGT program is administered the following year to allow for statewide ambulance data to be calculated, which sets the IGT rate for each agency. The program assists the City in recovering costs associated with the provision of emergency medical services (EMS) to individuals who are covered by Medi-Cal. Participation in the IGT program provides an important opportunity for the City to collect ambulance transport fees that would not otherwise be available.

Currently, the Medi-Cal program reimburses far less than the actual cost to provide the service.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute agreements allowing the San Rafael Fire Department to participate in a Medi-Cal Intergovernmental Transfer (IGT) program with the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) and Kaiser for the service period of January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024.

BACKGROUND:

Since 2006, DHCS has offered public healthcare providers the opportunity to participate in a program that increases reimbursement for services provided to Medi-Cal Managed Care plan members. The DHCS Voluntary Rate Range Intergovernmental Transfer program (Welfare and Institutions Code §§14164, 14301.4) provides a way for Medi-Cal Managed Care Health Plan providers to access federal matching funds for Medi-Cal reimbursements. In 2015, this program was expanded to include public emergency medical services (EMS) providers like the San Rafael Fire Department, who provide health SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 2
care/ambulance services to Medi-Cal managed care enrollees. This made public EMS providers eligible for increased reimbursements from Medi-Cal Managed Care Health Plan providers.

Under the IGT program, counties and other governmental entities in the State may choose to transfer funds to the State to support the Medi-Cal program. These funds are used to match federal funds, which are eventually returned to the EMS providers through their respective Medi-Cal Managed Care Health Plan providers. In Marin County, the Medi-Cal Managed Care Health Plan provider is called the Partnership Health Plan of California.

Transport data is collected from each agency quarterly to calculate the program's total size and share of the reimbursement. Once collected, letters of interest are sent to each eligible agency to determine if they intend to participate. Using the letters of interest, DHCS then calculates each agency’s share of the program based on the number of returned letters of interest. Since Q4 2024 transport data is not submitted until Q1 2025, the calendar year 2024 program is administered in 2025.

This year, for the first time, Kaiser is administering their own IGT with DHCS. Kaiser and DHCS are working together to collect the revenues concurrently and through DHCS, but separate agreements need to be signed to participate in each program.

ANALYSIS:

Overview of IGT Program: The IGT program requires the transfer of eligible local dollars from the City to DHCS. DHCS, in turn, uses transferred funds from local governments to increase monthly capitation rates it previously paid Medi-Cal Managed Care Health Plan providers in the prior fiscal year, thus allowing DHCS to receive additional federal funding from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for payment to the Medi-Cal Managed Care Health Plan providers. The Medi-Cal Managed Care Health Plan providers then pay most of their IGT-funded rate increases to the local governments that transferred the funds. Ultimately, each participating in local government receives back the funding it provided to participate in the program, plus the federal match in return.

In February 2025, DHCS and Kaiser notified the City that non-binding letters of interest must be submitted to the City to participate in the program for the service period of January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Since the IGT program is voluntary, the non-binding letter allows DHCS and Kaiser to better estimate how many agencies will participate, which sets the IGT contribution rate for each agency.

Staff submitted the non-binding letters of interest and have been working with DHCS and Kaiser to develop the necessary agreement for participation. In May 2025, DHCS provided an estimated transfer amount for both DHCS and Kaiser based on the returned letters of interest from participating agencies with a standard agreement that all participating agencies must sign (Attachment 1). DHCS is requesting the agreement be returned by August 1, 2025. Kaiser’s agreement is forthcoming but must be signed around the same time.

Transfer from the City to the State: Once CMS has approved the entire IGT transaction, and the plan rate contracts have been signed by DHCS and the Medi-Cal Managed Care Health Plans throughout the State, DHCS will submit a request to participating agencies to transfer funds to the State. With the City Council’s approval, the City will transfer an estimated $366,163 to DHCS. Additionally, the City will make a separate estimated payment of $73,228 (20%) to DHCS and Kaiser as authorized in Welfare and Institutions Code Section 14301.4, to cover the administrative costs (assessment fee) of operating the IGT program for the service period of January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. If the State is unable to use all the transferred funds to increase plan rates, it will return any used funds and the SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 3
associated 20% administrative fee.

Payment to the City: Federal matching funds received by the City will be used to promote the wellbeing of Partnership HealthPlan of California beneficiaries by maintaining the current service levels of the paramedic program. Although DHCS, Kaiser, and the Partnership HealthPlan of California cannot provide the City a revenue estimate until they receive all participants signed IGT Agreements. The Fire Department expects to net roughly $611,716 for the service period of January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024, based on prior year revenues.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The IGT will support the Emergency Medical Services Fund by recovering a greater portion of its ambulance transport costs.

The DHCS agreement provides approximate transfer amounts based on information provided to the City by Kaiser and Partnership HealthPlan of California, the County’s Medi-Cal Managed Health Care Plan provider. A summary of the amount the City expects to transfer to DHCS and receive back through participation in this program is outlined below.

Time Period Funding
Source
Transfer
Amount to
DHCS
Admin
Fee to
DHCS
Estimated Funds
Returned to City
Estimated Net
New Funds
2024
Calendar Year Fund 210 $366,163 $73,228 $1,051,107 $611,716 The proposed funds to be transferred to the State will be allocated from the City’s Paramedic Services Fund (210) and are expected to be transferred in November 2025.

OPTIONS:

1. Authorize the City Manager to execute agreements allowing the San Rafael Fire Department to participate in a Medi-Cal Intergovernmental Transfer (IGT) program with the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) and Kaiser for the service period of January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024.

2. Direct staff to return with more information.

3. Take no action.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. IGT Agreement for 2024 Calendar Year with San Rafael Fire Department Allocation Estimates 1 RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION OF THE SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS ALLOWING THE SAN RAFAEL FIRE

DEPARTMENT TO PARTICIPATE IN A MEDI-CAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL

TRANSFER (IGT) PROGRAM WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

CARE SERVICES (DHCS) AND KAISER FOR THE SERVICE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2024, THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2024
WHEREAS, the City of San Rafael, through its Fire Department, regularly provides emergency ambulance transport to persons who are Medi-Cal patients enrolled in managed care plans; and
WHEREAS, the City participates in various governmental programs that provide reimbursement of costs incurred in providing such emergency services to Medi-Cal patients; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority of Welfare & Institutions Code sections 14164 and 14301.4, since 2006 the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) has been offering a voluntary rate range Intergovernmental Transfer Program to allow healthcare providers such as the City of San Rafael Fire Department to access federal matching funds for reimbursement through their Medi-Cal Managed Care Health Plan Providers; and
WHEREAS, the City may pursue an Intergovernmental Transfer to DHCS and Kaiser through its Medi-Cal Managed Care Health Plan Provider, Partnership Health Plan of California (PHC); and
WHEREAS, by participating in the Intergovernmental Transfer Program, the City will receive reimbursements for a larger proportion of its actual costs for providing emergency ambulance transport to Medi-Cal patients enrolled in managed care plans; and
WHEREAS, under the Intergovernmental Transfer Program, the funds shall be transferred in accordance with a mutually agreed-upon schedule between the City of San Rafael and DHCS;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the San Rafael City Council as follows:

1. The San Rafael Fire Department is hereby authorized to participate in an Intergovernmental Transfer (IGT) with the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) in order to increase the Department’s reimbursement for EMS ambulance transport services provided to Partnership Health Plan of California (PHC) members for the service period of January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024.
2 2. The City Manager is authorized to execute two separate required Intergovernmental Agreements Regarding Transfer of Public Funds with DHCS and Kaiser subject to final approval as to form by the City Attorney.

3. The City Council hereby authorizes the transfer of funds to DHCS pursuant to such agreement, in an amount approved by the City Manager and in accordance with a mutually agreed upon schedule, to be used solely as a portion of the non-federal share of actuarially-sound Medi-Cal managed care capitation rate increases for the Partnership Health Care period of January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024.

I, LINDSAY LARA, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on Monday, the 2nd day of June 2025 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
_________________
Lindsay Lara, City Clerk
CONTRACT # IGT-24-0022
1 Template Version - 4/2025

INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT REGARDING

TRANSFER OF PUBLIC FUNDS
This Agreement is entered into between the CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES (“DHCS”) and CITY OF SAN RAFAEL (“GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING ENTITY”) with respect to the matters set forth below.

The parties agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Transfer of Public Funds

1.1 The GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING ENTITY agrees to make a transfer of funds to DHCS pursuant to sections 14164 and 14301.4 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.

The amount transferred shall be based on the sum of the applicable rate category per member per month (“PMPM”) contribution increments multiplied by member months, as reflected in Exhibit

1. The GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING ENTITY agrees to initially transfer amounts that are calculated using the Estimated Member Months in Exhibit 1, which will be reconciled to actual enrollment for the service period of January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024 in accordance with Sub-Section 1.3 of this Agreement. The funds transferred shall be used as described in SubSection 2.2 of this Agreement. The funds shall be transferred in accordance with the terms and conditions, including schedule and amount, established by DHCS.

1.2 The GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING ENTITY shall certify that the funds transferred qualify for Federal Financial Participation pursuant to 42 C.F.R. part 433, subpart B, and are not derived from impermissible sources such as recycled Medicaid payments, Federal money excluded from use as State match, impermissible taxes, and non-bona fide provider- CONTRACT # IGT-24-0022
2 Template Version - 4/2025
related donations. Impermissible sources do not include patient care or other revenue received from programs such as Medicare or Medicaid to the extent that the program revenue is not obligated to the State as the source of funding.

1.3 DHCS shall reconcile the “Estimated Member Months,” in Exhibit 1, to actual enrollment in HEALTH PLAN(S) for the service period of January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024 using actual enrollment figures taken from DHCS records. Enrollment reconciliation will occur on an ongoing basis as updated enrollment figures become available.

Actual enrollment figures will be considered final two years after December 31, 2024. If reconciliation results in an increase to the total amount necessary to fund the nonfederal share of the payments described in Sub-Section 2.2, the GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING ENTITY agrees to transfer any additional funds necessary to cover the difference. If reconciliation results in a decrease to the total amount necessary to fund the nonfederal share of the payments described in Sub-Section 2.2, DHCS agrees to return the unexpended funds to the GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING ENTITY. If DHCS and the GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING ENTITY mutually agree, amounts due to or owed by the GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING ENTITY may be offset against future transfers.

2. Acceptance and Use of Transferred Funds

2.1 DHCS shall exercise its authority under section 14164 of the Welfare and Institutions Code to accept funds transferred by the GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING ENTITY pursuant to this Agreement as Intergovernmental Transfer (IGTs), to use for the purpose set forth in Sub-Section 2.2.

2.2 The funds transferred by the GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING ENTITY pursuant to Section 1 and Exhibit 1 of this Agreement shall be used to fund the non-federal share CONTRACT # IGT-24-0022
3 Template Version - 4/2025
of Medi-Cal Managed Care actuarially sound capitation rates described in section 14301.4(b)(4) of the Welfare and Institutions Code as reflected in the contribution PMPM and rate categories reflected in Exhibit 1. The funds transferred shall be paid, together with the related Federal Financial Participation, by DHCS to HEALTH PLAN(S) as part of HEALTH PLAN(S)’ capitation rates for the service period of January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024, in accordance with section 14301.4 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.

2.3 DHCS shall seek Federal Financial Participation for the capitation rates specified in Sub-Section 2.2 to the full extent permitted by federal law.

2.4 The parties acknowledge that DHCS will obtain any necessary approvals from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

2.5 DHCS shall not direct HEALTH PLAN(S)’ expenditure of the payments received pursuant to Sub-Section 2.2.

3. Assessment Fee

3.1 DHCS shall exercise its authority under section 14301.4 of the Welfare and Institutions Code to assess a 20 percent fee related to the amounts transferred pursuant to Section 1 of this Agreement, except as provided in Sub-Section 3.2. GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING ENTITY agrees to pay the full amount of that assessment in addition to the funds transferred pursuant to Section 1 of this Agreement.

3.2 The 20-percent assessment fee shall not be applied to any portion of funds transferred pursuant to Section 1 that are exempt in accordance with sections 14301.4(d) or 14301.5(b)(4) of the Welfare and Institutions Code. DHCS shall have sole discretion to determine the amount of the funds transferred pursuant to Section 1 that will not be subject to a CONTRACT # IGT-24-0022
4 Template Version - 4/2025
20 percent fee. DHCS has determined that $0.00 of the transfer amounts will not be assessed a 20 percent fee, subject to Sub-Section 3.3.

3.3 The 20-percent assessment fee pursuant to this Agreement is nonrefundable and shall be wired to DHCS simultaneously with the transfer amounts made under Section 1 of this Agreement. If at the time of the reconciliation performed pursuant to SubSection 1.3 of this Agreement, there is a change in the amount transferred that is subject to the 20-percent assessment in accordance with Sub-Section 3.1, then a proportional adjustment to the assessment fee will be made.

4. Amendments

4.1 No amendment or modification to this Agreement shall be binding on either party unless made in writing and executed by both parties.

4.2 The parties shall negotiate in good faith to amend this Agreement as necessary and appropriate to implement the requirements set forth in Section 2 of this Agreement.

5. Notices. Any and all notices required, permitted, or desired to be given hereunder by one party to the other shall either be sent via secure email or submitted in writing to the other party personally or by United States First Class, Certified or Registered mail with postage prepaid, addressed to the other party at the address as set forth below:

To the GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING ENTITY:

Thomas Wong, Sr. Mgmt Analyst II
CONTRACT # IGT-24-0022
5 Template Version - 4/2025
1375 5th Ave.

San Rafael, CA 94901
(415) 458-5360
[email protected]
With copies to:

Abraham Roman, Fire Chief
1375 5th Ave.

San Rafael, CA 94901
(415) 458-3306
[email protected]
Jason Hatfield, EMS Battalion Chief
1375 5th Ave.

San Rafael, CA 94901
(415) 458-3306
[email protected]
To DHCS:

Vivian Beeck
California Department of Health Care Services
Capitated Rates Development Division
1501 Capitol Ave., MS 4413
Sacramento, CA 95814
[email protected]

6. Other Provisions

6.1 This Agreement contains the entire Agreement between the parties with respect to the Medi-Cal payments described in Sub-Section 2.2 of this Agreement that are funded by the GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING ENTITY, and supersedes any previous or contemporaneous oral or written proposals, statements, discussions, negotiations or other agreements between the GOVERNMENTAL FUNDING ENTITY and DHCS relating to the subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement is not, however, intended to be the sole agreement between the parties on matters relating to the funding and administration of the Medi- CONTRACT # IGT-24-0022
6 Template Version - 4/2025
Cal program. This Agreement shall not modify the terms of any other agreement, existing or entered into in the future, between the parties.

6.2 The non-enforcement or other waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall not be construed as a continuing waiver or as a waiver of any other provision of this Agreement.

6.3 Sections 2 and 3 of this Agreement shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

6.4 Nothing in this Agreement is intended to confer any rights or remedies on any third party, including, without limitation, any provider(s) or groups of providers, or any right to medical services for any individual(s) or groups of individuals. Accordingly, there shall be no third party beneficiary of this Agreement.

6.5 Time is of the essence in this Agreement.

6.6 Each party hereby represents that the person(s) executing this Agreement on its behalf is duly authorized to do so. Any required signature(s) on any documents must be in compliance with California Government Code section 16.5 and any other applicable state or federal regulations.

7. State Authority. Except as expressly provided herein, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit, restrict, or modify the DHCS’ powers, authorities, and duties under Federal and State law and regulations.

8. Approval. This Agreement is of no force and effect until signed by the parties.

9. Term. This Agreement shall be effective as of January 1, 2024 and shall expire as of June 30, 2027 unless terminated earlier by mutual agreement of the parties.

CONTRACT # IGT-24-0022
7 Template Version - 4/2025

SIGNATURES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement, on the date of the last signature below.

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL:

By: Date: _______________________
Cristine Alilovich, City Manager
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES:

By: Date: _______________________
Authorized Representative, Department of Health Care Services CONTRACT # IGT-24-0022
8 Template Version - 4/2025
Exhibit 1
Health Plan Funding Entity Rating Region Service Period Participation % Partnership Health Plan
of California City of San Rafael North Bay 1/2024 - 12/2024 0.68% Category of Aid SIS/UIS Contribution
PMPM
Estimated Member
Months*
Estimated
Contribution (NonFederal Share)
Child SIS $ 0.03 1,183,773 $ 35,513
Child UIS $ 0.01 101,234 $ 1,012
Adult SIS $ 0.08 402,627 $ 32,210
Adult UIS $ 0.05 277,256 $ 13,863
Adult Expansion SIS $ 0.01 1,076,570 $ 10,766
Adult Expansion UIS $ 0.01 303,621 $ 3,036
SPD SIS $ 0.25 201,658 $ 50,415
SPD UIS $ 0.13 31,151 $ 4,050
SPD Dual SIS $ 0.10 433,986 $ 43,399
SPD Dual UIS $ 0.02 4,914 $ 98
LTC SIS $ 0.24 934 $ 224
LTC UIS $ 0.13 365 $ 47
LTC Dual SIS $ 0.10 16,535 $ 1,654
LTC Dual UIS $ 0.02 51 $ 1
WCM SIS $ 0.28 41,744 $ 11,688
WCM UIS $ 0.16 1,792 $ 287
Est. FE Total 4,078,211 $ 208,263
Health Plan Funding Entity Rating Region Service Period Participation % Kaiser Foundation Health
Plan City of San Rafael North Bay 1/2024 - 12/2024 2.71% Category of Aid SIS/UIS Contribution
PMPM
Estimated Member
Months*
Estimated
Contribution (NonFederal Share)
Child SIS $ 0.12 385,112 $ 46,213
Child UIS $ 0.04 2,821 $ 113
Adult SIS $ 0.30 153,903 $ 46,171
Adult UIS $ 0.16 13,612 $ 2,178
Adult Expansion SIS $ - 281,499 $ -
Adult Expansion UIS $ - 15,737 $ -
SPD SIS $ 0.65 37,230 $ 24,200
SPD UIS $ 0.50 706 $ 353
SPD Dual SIS $ 0.17 88,064 $ 14,971
SPD Dual UIS $ 0.09 440 $ 40
LTC SIS $ 4.93 19 $ 94
LTC UIS $ - - $ -
LTC Dual SIS $ 4.05 999 $ 4,046
LTC Dual UIS $ 0.18 1 $ -
WCM SIS $ 1.14 17,014 $ 19,396
WCM UIS $ 0.71 138 $ 98
Est. FE Total 997,295 $ 157,873
CONTRACT # IGT-24-0022
9 Template Version - 4/2025
* Note that Estimated Member Months are subject to variation, and the actual total Contribution (Non-Federal Share) may differ from the amount listed here. * FMAP is a weighted blend of multiple FMAPs.
____________________________________________________________________________________

FOR CITY CLERK ONLY
Council Meeting:

Disposition:

Agenda Item No: 4.f
Meeting Date: June 2, 2025

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Department: Fire
From: Abraham Roman, Fire Chief
Thomas Wong, Senior Management
Analyst
City Manager Approval: ______________
TOPIC: PARAMEDIC TAX RATE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION MAINTAINING PARAMEDIC SERVICE SPECIAL TAX RATES AT THEIR CURRENT LEVELS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution to maintain Paramedic Service Special Tax Rates at their current levels for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26.

BACKGROUND:

In 1979, the voters of San Rafael approved a “Paramedic Service Special Tax,” adding Chapter 3.28 to the San Rafael Municipal Code (SRMC) to support a paramedic program. The original ordinance established the authority of the City Council to set the tax rates up to the maximum tax rate as approved by the voters, based upon a budget recommendation by the City Manager. The tax was applied at a flat rate per residential dwelling. At the same time, this tax was also approved by three separate jurisdictions that receive paramedic service through contract from the City of San Rafael, including the Marinwood Community Services District (CSD), County Service Area (CSA) No.13 (Upper Lucas Valley), and County Service Area (CSA) No. 19. There was no sunset provision included in the original tax.

In 1988, the voters approved an extension of the tax to improve non-residential structures, which was levied on a building square footage basis.

In November 2006, the voters of San Rafael passed Measure P, which increased the maximum tax rate to $85.00 per residential unit and to $0.11 per square foot of structures on non-residential property. The other service areas approved similar paramedic tax rates to align with San Rafael's measure.

In November 2010, the voters of San Rafael passed Measure I, which increased the maximum Paramedic Service Special Tax rate from $85.00 to $108.00 per residential unit and from $0.11 to $0.14 per square foot for the non-residential tax rate.

In November 2011, the voters of CSA No. 13 and CSA No. 19 passed Measures E and F, respectively.

These measures increased the maximum residential tax rate from $85.00 to $95.00 per residential unit SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 2
and the non-residential tax rate from $0.11 to $0.132 per square foot for both service areas. Marinwood CSD continues under its Measure M rate of $85.00 for residential, and $0.11 per square foot for nonresidential.

ANALYSIS:

SRMC section 3.28.060, “Annual Revision and Incidental Charges,” stipulates that the City Council shall determine annually the basic tax rate reflect charges and costs. The current tax rates are set at their voter-approved maximums, and based upon projected expenditures, revenues will be insufficient to cover the operating expenses of the paramedic program for the upcoming fiscal year; however, there is adequate fund balance to fully fund the program. At the current rate, the fund balance may be exhausted in the near future, absent a voter-approved increase in the maximum tax rate in all jurisdictions.

As the current tax rate for San Rafael is at its maximum, staff recommend maintaining the current residential rate of $108 per living unit. For non-residential properties, staff recommend maintaining the current rate of $0.140 per square foot for the City (See Attachment 2).

The City will continue to collect 100% of the Paramedic Service Special Tax revenue that is generated in CSAs 13, 19, and Marinwood. These funds are collected by the County of Marin Assessor’s Office and transferred to the City along with the revenues generated in San Rafael.

FISCAL IMPACT:

FY 2025-26, tax revenues are estimated to be $5,415,882. All revenues generated by this assessment are recorded in the Paramedic Service Special Tax Fund (210). Paramedic Tax revenues represent roughly 60% of the $9.55 million in total revenues projected for the Paramedic Services Special Tax Fund, which also includes $3.8 million in revenues from third-party billings related to ambulance transport.

Historically, the Paramedic Service Special Tax Fund covers approximately 27% of the cost of the fire and emergency medical service, with the balance funded from the City’s General Fund. Absent future increases to the Paramedic Tax rates assessed within the City and across the entire Fire Department service area, the Paramedic Service Special Tax Fund will not be able to sustain this level of support towards the cost of fire and emergency medical services, which could lead to reductions in service levels, if an increase to the Paramedic Tax is not supported by the voters.

OPTIONS:

The City Council has the following options to consider in this matter:

1. Adopt the resolution.

2. Direct staff to return with more information.

3. Take no action.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Staff recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution to maintain Paramedic Service Special Tax Rates at their current levels for (FY) Fiscal Year 2025-26.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution

2. Paramedic Rate and Ratio History
1 RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL

MAINTAINING PARAMEDIC SERVICE SPECIAL TAX RATES AT THEIR CURRENT LEVELS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
WHEREAS, the electors of the City of San Rafael in 1979 and in 1988, adopted a Paramedic Service Special Tax (Chapter 3.28 of the San Rafael Municipal Code) to be imposed annually upon all residential units and non-residential structures within the City of San Rafael; and
WHEREAS, on November 2, 2010, the electors of the City of San Rafael approved Measure “I”, subsequently designated as Ordinance No. 1891, increasing the ceiling on the Paramedic Service Special Tax rate to $108.00 per residential unit and to $0.14 per square foot of non-residential structures; and
WHEREAS, the current annual Paramedic Service Special Tax rates in the City limits of the City of San Rafael are $108.00 per residential unit and $0.140 per square foot of nonresidential structures; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after reviewing the proposed budget recommendation of the City Manager, finds that for the City of San Rafael, the basic rate is insufficient to cover the cost of providing the paramedic service to San Rafael residents; however, the current tax rate for San Rafael is at its maximum rate as approved by the voters.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the San Rafael City Council that:

The Paramedic Service Special Tax rates in the City of San Rafael shall be maintained at their current levels, at $108.00 per year for each residential unit and $0.140 per square foot for non-residential structures, for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

I, LINDSAY LARA, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City on Monday, the 2nd day of June 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
_______________________
LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk
Fiscal Residential Authorized Non-Residential Authorized Year Tax Rate Cap Tax Rate Cap
2016-17 $ 89.00 $ 108.00 $ 0.1400 0.1200 $
2017-18 $ 92.00 $ 108.00 $ 0.1400 0.1250 $
2018-19 $ 95.00 $ 108.00 $ 0.1400 0.1320 $
2019-20 $ 95.00 $ 108.00 $ 0.1400 0.1320 $
2020-21 $ 99.00 $ 108.00 $ 0.1400 0.1400 $
2021-22 $ 99.00 $ 108.00 $ 0.1400 0.1400 $
2022-23 $ 104.00 $ 108.00 $ 0.1400 0.1400 $
2023-24 $ 108.00 $ 108.00 $ 0.1400 0.1400 $
2024-25 $ 108.00 $ 108.00 $ 0.1400 0.1400 $
2025-26 Proposed $ 108.00 $ 108.00 $ 0.1400 0.1400 $
Fiscal Residential Authorized Non-Residential Authorized Year Tax Rate Cap Tax Rate Cap
2016-17 $ 95.00 89.00 $ 0.1200 $ 0.1320 $
2017-18 $ 95.00 92.00 $ 0.1250 $ 0.1320 $
2018-19 $ 95.00 95.00 $ 0.1320 $ 0.1320 $
2019-20 $ 95.00 95.00 $ 0.1320 $ 0.1320 $
2020-21 $ 95.00 95.00 $ 0.1320 $ 0.1320 $
2021-22 $ 95.00 95.00 $ 0.1320 $ 0.1320 $
2022-23 $ 95.00 95.00 $ 0.1320 $ 0.1320 $
2023-24 $ 95.00 95.00 $ 0.1320 $ 0.1320 $
2024-25 $ 95.00 95.00 $ 0.1320 $ 0.1320 $
2025-26 Proposed $ 95.00 95.00 $ 0.1320 $ 0.1320 $
Fiscal Residential Authorized Non-Residential Authorized Year Tax Rate Cap Tax Rate Cap
2016-17 $ 85.00 85.00 $ 0.1100 $ 0.1100 $
2017-18 $ 85.00 85.00 $ 0.1100 $ 0.1100 $
2018-19 $ 85.00 85.00 $ 0.1100 $ 0.1100 $
2019-20 $ 85.00 85.00 $ 0.1100 $ 0.1100 $
2020-21 $ 85.00 85.00 $ 0.1100 $ 0.1100 $
2021-22 $ 85.00 85.00 $ 0.1100 $ 0.1100 $
2022-23 $ 85.00 85.00 $ 0.1100 $ 0.1100 $
2023-24 $ 85.00 85.00 $ 0.1100 $ 0.1100 $
2024-25 $ 85.00 85.00 $ 0.1100 $ 0.1100 $
2025-26 Proposed $ 85.00 85.00 $ 0.1100 $ 0.1100 $
Fiscal Year Residential Non-Residential
2016-17 56.99% 43.01%
2017-18 53.97% 46.03%
2018-19 53.40% 46.60%
2019-20 53.35% 46.65%
2020-21 52.77% 47.23%
2021-22 52.79% 47.21%
2022-23 53.88% 46.12%
2023-24 54.76% 45.24%
2024-25 54.80% 45.20%
2025-26 Proposed 54.63% 45.37%
Paramedic Tax Ratio
City of San Rafael

MARINWOOD (CSD)

HISTORY OF TAX RATES AND CAPS
CSA# 13, and CSA# 19
____________________________________________________________________________________

FOR CITY CLERK ONLY
Council Meeting: _______________________
Disposition: ___________________________
Agenda Item No: 4.g
Meeting Date: June 2, 2025

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Department: Fire
Prepared by: Abraham Roman, Fire Chief/Fire
Marshal
City Manager Approval: ______________
TOPIC: REPORT ON 2024 FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTIONS OF CERTAIN OCCUPANCIES SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A REPORT MADE BY THE FIRE

CHIEF/FIRE MARSHAL REGARDING THE FIRE PREVENTION INSPECTIONS OF CERTAIN OCCUPANCIES PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13146.2 AND 13146.3 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2024 RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution acknowledging receipt of a report made by the Fire Chief/Fire Marshal regarding the fire prevention inspections of certain occupancies pursuant to sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 of the California Health and Safety Code for calendar year (CY) 2024.

BACKGROUND:

On December 2, 2016, a fire broke out in a warehouse known as the Ghost Ship in Oakland, California.

What became the deadliest fire in the history of the city took 36 lives that night. The deadliest fire since the Station nightclub fire in 2003 quickly caught the attention of media throughout California and the United States. Several articles, editorials, and social media postings were published, specifically around the Bay Area.

Media attention put a spotlight on fire and safety laws and inspections in California. In response, lawmakers passed SB 1205, which was authored to assist in preventing tragedies of this nature and magnitude. On September 27, 2018, SB 1205 became effective and added a new section to the California Health and Safety Code (CHSC), which affects every fire department or fire district in the State. This new bill requires every fire department or district to annually report to its administering authority their compliance with the annual inspection requirements of the California Health and Safety Code. The bill also requires the administering authority to formally acknowledge receipt of the compliance report in a resolution or a similar formal document.

ANALYSIS:

In addition to reporting requirements, SB 1205 requires every fire department or district providing fire protection services to inspect every building used as a public or private school annually. This same annual inspection requirement is applicable to hotels, motels, lodging houses, residential care facilities and apartment houses containing three or more living units. SB 1205 and the required reporting provides an SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 2
avenue for policy makers to understand the annual inspection requirements as well as compliance so they can understand full compliance or shortcomings.

During calendar year 2024, the Fire Department was able to complete all inspections in accordance with the mandate.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact associated with this report. The inspection program is funded through baseline appropriations within the Fire Department’s approved budget.

OPTIONS:

The City Council has the following options to consider on this matter:

1. Adopt the resolution.

2. Adopt the resolution with modifications.

3. Direct staff to return with more information.

4. Take no action.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution
RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL

ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A REPORT MADE BY THE FIRE

CHIEF/FIRE MARSHAL REGARDING THE FIRE PREVENTION

INSPECTIONS OF CERTAIN OCCUPANCIES PURSUANT TO
SECTIONS 13146.2 AND 13146.3 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2024
WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 13146.4 was added in 2018, and became effective on September 27, 2018; and
WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 requires all fire departments, including the San Rafael Fire Department, that provide fire protection services to perform annual inspections in every building used as a public or private school, hotel, motel, lodging house, and apartment house compliance with building standards, as provided; and
WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 13146.2 requires all fire departments, including the San Rafael Fire Department, that provide fire protection services to report annually to its administering authority on its compliance with Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of San Rafael intends this Resolution to fulfill the requirements of the California Health & Safety Code regarding acknowledgment of the San Rafael Fire Department’s compliance with California Health and Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL RESOLVES that it has received the annual inspection report required pursuant to Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 of the California Health and Safety Code during calendar year 2024, as follows:

A. EDUCATIONAL GROUP E OCCUPANCIES:

Educational Group E occupancies are generally those public and private schools, used by more than six persons at any one time for educational purposes through the 12th grade.

During calendar year 2024, the San Rafael Fire Department completed the annual inspections of Group E occupancies, buildings, structures and/or facilities.

B. RESIDENTIAL GROUP R OCCUPANCIES:

Residential Group R occupancies, for the purposes of this resolution, are generally those occupancies containing sleeping units, and include hotels, motels, apartments (three units or more), etc. as well as other residential occupancies (including several residential care facilities). These residential care facilities have a few different sub-classifications, and they may contain residents or clients that have a range of needs, including those related to custodial care, mobility impairments, cognitive disabilities, etc. The residents may also be non-ambulatory or bedridden.

During calendar year 2024, the San Rafael Fire Department completed the annual inspections of the Group R occupancies, buildings, structures and/or facilities.

I, Lindsay Lara, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of said City held on the 2nd day of June 2025 by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
____________________
LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk
____________________________________________________________________________________

FOR CITY CLERK ONLY
Council Meeting:

Disposition:

Agenda Item No: 4.h
Meeting Date: June 2, 2025

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Department: Public Works
Prepared by: April Miller, Director of Public Works
Jonathan Schellin, Deputy Director
of Public Works
City Manager Approval: ________
TOPIC: BAYPOINT LAGOONS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
SUBJECT: BAYPOINT LAGOONS LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 2025-26
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommend that the City Council approve the following items:

1. Adopt a resolution directing the filing of the Engineer’s FY 2025-26 Annual Report.

2. Adopt a resolution approving the Engineer’s FY 2025-26 Annual Report.

3. Adopt a resolution of intention to order improvements and set up a public hearing on the annual assessment for the City Council meeting on June 23, 2025.

BACKGROUND:

To comply with provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, which governs this type of assessment District, the City Council must approve an Engineer’s report annually. Assessments to be collected by the District must be allocated and levied annually after an appropriate public hearing, to be held this year on June 23, 2025.

The Baypoint Lagoons Landscaping and Lighting District (Assessment District) was formed in 1990 to protect and enhance wildlife habitat and water quality in the Baypoint (Spinnaker) Lagoons, the adjacent ponds, and diked salt marsh. There are four total ponds/lagoons located within the Assessment District. Maintenance provided by this District has historically included mowing around the lagoon, replanting areas with native vegetation, and eradicating exotic plants such as cattails.

Since the mid-2000s, the Baypoint Lagoons Homeowners
Association (HOA) has taken a more active role in the
landscaping of the lagoon areas. In recent years, the HOA, as opposed to the Assessment District, has funded landscaping and biannual mowing of the grass around the lagoon. In 2015, Assessment District boundaries (yellow) SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 2
the landscaping and eradication of non-native species moved to a manageable maintenance level. The HOA approached the City with two major concerns: the seasonal odor nuisance from the lagoons and the related need for improvements to the nearby Cayes Stormwater Pump Station. The homeowners agreed that Assessment District funds could be used toward these priorities.

Assessment District Funds Overview and Update
The Assessment District was originally structured with three dedicated funds, each serving a specific purpose in support of the environmental health and infrastructure needs of the lagoon and surrounding areas:

1. Eradication of Exotic Plants Fund
This fund was established as the primary funding source to protect and enhance wildlife habitat in the lagoons, ponds, and diked salt marshes within the district boundaries. While the homeowners' association (HOA) assumed maintenance responsibilities for the waterfront and lagoon edges in the mid-2000s, the City has continued to perform periodic vegetation maintenance within the lagoon itself and on the islands.

2. Environmental Monitoring Fund
This fund was created in response to residents’ concerns about lagoon odors, especially during the summer months. Although the salt pond, believed to be the primary source of the odor, is located on private property, the proximity to residential areas prompted community members to request that District funds be used to study odor mitigation. In 2014, the City partnered with Siegel Environmental to complete a comprehensive study on lagoon health and odor control options. In recent years, manual gate adjustments by Public Works staff to regulate water levels have successfully minimized odor complaints and enhanced lagoon recharge.

3. Cayes Stormwater Pump Station Improvements Fund
Although located just outside the District, the Cayes Stormwater Pump Station is a critical component of the lagoon system, providing essential drainage and odor control functions. Since 2006, the District has allocated funds annually to modernize the station’s control systems.

Upgrades to support more efficient and remote operations would help improve water level management and reduce odor risks caused by algae growth and hot weather.

In an effort to better reflect the District’s long-term environmental goals and today’s reality, the Eradication of Exotic Plants Fund and Phase II Environmental Monitoring Fund have been merged into a newly created Habitat Protection Fund. This change recognizes the overlap in purpose and desired outcomes of the two legacy funds and allows for a more strategic, flexible, and holistic approach to managing and improving the ecological health of the lagoon system.

The Habitat Protection Fund will support a broad range of environmental stewardship activities, including:
• Ongoing removal and control of invasive, non-native plant species that threaten the lagoon’s biodiversity and surrounding marsh habitat.
• Support implementing the recently developed WRA landscape design plan, which includes introducing native and ecologically appropriate vegetation to enhance habitat value and improve visual aesthetics.
• Irrigation system updates and water management improvements, as recommended by the design plan, to support sustainable planting efforts.
• Continued monitoring of lagoon health, including water quality, vegetation growth, and wildlife habitat, to inform adaptive management practices.
• Manual and/or automated management of lagoon water levels to help mitigate odors, support native species, and maintain the ecological balance of the water body.

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 3
The merger recognizes that effective habitat protection and environmental quality management are interconnected efforts that benefit from a coordinated funding source. This consolidated fund will allow the City and the community to respond more nimbly to emerging needs, fund multi-purpose projects, and advance shared goals related to conservation, aesthetics, and odor mitigation.

ANALYSIS:

City staff have continued efforts to regulate lagoon water levels, which has minimized odor complaints and supported lagoon recharge. Maintenance included manual regulation of water levels for stormwater and odor control, and cleaning of pipes discharging into the lagoon and connecting it to the salt marsh.

While effective, these manual operations underscore the need for an automated pump system that can be monitored by the Department of Public Works (DPW). Although the Pump Station Control Fund cannot fully cover the cost of such an upgrade, moderate contributions will continue, with the fund projected to have a balance of $100,470 on June 30, 2025. The District does not anticipate bearing the full cost of the system, recognizing broader regional benefits.

DPW also invested in a floating treatment island, to be installed in summer 2025, designed to enhance water quality through natural filtration. Floating islands support pollutant removal and aquatic habitat restoration, with research indicating reductions of up to 99% in ammonia and 95% in total suspended solids.

In response to resident concerns about vegetation and invasive species, the City engaged WRA to develop a landscape and irrigation plan. Ongoing collaboration with residents will guide any implementation efforts. Finding determinations for this work are pending. The Eradication of Exotic Plants Fund and the Phase II Environmental Monitoring Fund have been merged into a newly titled Habitat Protection Fund, expected to have a balance of $110,839 on June 30, 2025.

The activities for the Assessment District Fund during FY 2024-25 were as follows:

July 1, 2024 Fund Balance $235,419
Revenues
Assessments $25,368
Interest $8,838
Total Revenues $34,206
Assessment District Expenditures through March 31:

County fees $290
Landscaping Improvements - Floating Islands $7,852
Staff Time $8,000
Contractual Services – WRA Landscape Design $5,794
Estimated Assessment District Expenditures April 1 - June 30:

Additional Floating Island Installation Costs $3,000
Staff Time $3,500
Contractual Services - WRA Landscape Design $13,767
Total Expenditures (proj.) $42,203
Projected June 30, 2024 Fund Balance $227,421
SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 4
The attached resolutions provide for filing and approval of the Engineer’s 2025-26 Annual Report for the District and setting the public hearing on the assessments.

FISCAL IMPACT:

All revenues and expenses are generated by the Assessment District and are contained within the Baypoint Lagoons Assessment District Fund (Fund No. 235). The proposed FY 2025-26 assessment is $131.44 per parcel, which has remained unchanged since 1996. The City incurs indirect General Fund costs related to staff time spent managing the District, and monitoring and adjusting the lagoon water level, and managing the capital improvements at the Cayes Stormwater Pump Station. The District pays for all direct contracted costs.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

Landscaping and lighting district assessments are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Guidelines Section 15378 (b) (4), because government fiscal activities that do not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment are not considered projects.

OPTIONS:

The City Council has the following options to consider relating to this item:

1. Adopt the three resolutions as presented.

2. Provide direction to staff to modify any or all the resolutions and return to the City Council with additional information.

3. Do not adopt the resolutions. If the Council does not adopt the resolutions, the public hearing will not take place, and the City will be unable to levy the annual assessment against property owners within the Assessment District.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Staff recommend that the City Council approve the following items:

1. Adopt a resolution directing the filing of the Engineer’s FY 2025-26 Annual Report.

2. Adopt a resolution approving the Engineer’s FY 2025-26 Annual Report.

3. Adopt a resolution of intention to order improvements and setting a public hearing on the annual assessment for the City Council meeting of June 23, 2025.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution directing the filing of Engineer’s 2025-26 Annual Report.

2. Resolution approving the Engineer’s 2025-26 Annual Report.

3. Resolution of intention to order improvements and setting a Public Hearing on the Annual Assessment for the City Council meeting of June 23, 2025.

4. City Engineer’s 2025-26 Annual Report.

5. Engineer’s Report Part C- Assessment Roll

6. Engineer’s Report Part E- Property Owners List

7. Engineer’s Report Part F- Diagram
RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION OF THE SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL DIRECTING
FILING OF ENGINEER’S ANNUAL REPORT FY 2025-26

BAYPOINT LAGOONS LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
_________________________________________________
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL RESOLVES that:

1. Joanna Kwok, City Engineer for Baypoint Lagoons Landscaping and Lighting District, City of San Rafael, Marin County, California, and is hereby directed to file with the City Clerk an annual report for fiscal year 2025-26 in accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

2. This resolution is adopted pursuant to Section 22622 of the Streets and Highways Code.

I, LINDSAY LARA, Clerk of the City of San Rafael, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council of said City on the 2nd day of June 2025, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION OF THE SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL APPROVING
ENGINEER’S ANNUAL REPORT FY 2025-26

1. Joanna Kwok, City Engineer for Baypoint Lagoons Landscaping and Lighting District has filed with the City Clerk an Engineer’s Annual Report for fiscal year 2025-26 in accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

2. The aforementioned Engineer’s Annual Report, on file with the City Clerk, is approved as filed.

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ORDER

IMPROVEMENTS AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2025

BAYPOINT LAGOONS LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
__________________________________________________
WHEREAS, The City Council intends to levy and collect assessments within the Baypoint Lagoons Landscaping and Lighting District, City of San Rafael, Marin County, California, during the fiscal year 2025-26. The area of land to be assessed is located in the City of San Rafael, Marin County.

WHEREAS, In accordance with this Council’s resolution directing the filing of an Engineer’s Annual Report, Joanna Kwok, City Engineer, has filed with the City Clerk the report required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. All interested persons are referred to that report for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the assessment district.

WHEREAS, in accordance with this Council’s resolution directing the filing of an Engineer’s Annual Report, Joanna Kwok, City Engineer, has filed with the City Clerk the report required by Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution (“Proposition 218”) and Article 4 of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the “Act,” and together with Proposition 218, collectively, the “Assessment Law”). All interested persons are referred to that Report for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District.

WHEREAS, the Engineer’s Annual Report does not provide any increase in the assessment methodology or any formula or range of assessments which will increase the assessments, rather the assessment is proposed to increase based on the previously adopted methodology, and as such, under Government Code section 53753.5, the City need not further comply with the notice, protest and hearing requirements of section 53753.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Rafael, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

3. On Tuesday, the 23rd of June 2025 at the hour of 6:00 o’clock P.M., the City Council will conduct a public hearing on the question of the levy of the proposed annual assessment. The hearing will be held in person at the City Council Chambers.

4. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give the notice of hearing required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 by publishing a copy of this resolution once in the Marin Independent Journal, publication to be completed not less than ten (10) days before June 23, 2025.

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk

ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT
FOR

BAYPOINT LAGOONS LANDSCAPING

AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
2025 - 2026

FOR THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL

CALIFORNIA

COUNCIL MEETING
JUNE 2, 2025
First Meeting
June 23, 2025
Second Meeting
Prepared By:

City of San Rafael

Page 1 ends

ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT
2025-2026

BAYPOINT LAGOONS LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, MARIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed annual report as directed by the City Council.

DATED: ________________

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Joanna Kwok, City of San Rafael, City Engineer
By ______________________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Annual Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the ____________________ day of ___________________, 2025.

LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk, City of San Rafael, Marin County, California
By ______________________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Annual Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved on __________, 2025 and confirmed by the City Council of the City of San Rafael, Marin County, California, on the ___________________ day of ___________________, 2025.

LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk, City of San Rafael, Marin County, California
By ______________________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Annual Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Marin on the ____________________ day of ____________________, 2025.

LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk, City of San Rafael, Marin County, California
By ______________________________________

Page 2 ends

ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT
2025-2026

BAYPOINT LAGOONS LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, MARIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
City of San Rafael, Engineer of Work for Baypoint Lagoons Landscaping and Lighting District, City of San Rafael, Marin County, California, makes this annual report, as directed by the City Council, by its Resolution No. ___________, adopted ______________, 2025.

The improvements which are the subject of this report are briefly described as follows:

Creating, maintaining, and monitoring open space habitat. Each year for the foreseeable future, cattail removal will be undertaken to enhance the habitat. After at least five years of cattail eradication, a monitoring assessment will be completed to document the effectiveness of the removal effort. The monitoring will be done in accordance with the proposal for SPINNAKER LAGOON MANAGEMENT, as prepared by Resource Management International, Inc. previously known as Western Ecological Services Company, Inc., dated February 25, 1998, and the letter dated November 28, 1999 by Wetlands Research Associates. The future Report will reflect anticipated costs to provide funds for the monitoring program necessary to demonstrate the contingent viability of the diked marsh area. Future monitoring is the best way to demonstrate to interested agencies the success of the mitigation program that is the responsibility of the district.

This report consists of six parts, as follows:

PART A - Plans (SPINNAKER LAGOON MANAGEMENT PLAN, WETLAND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES LETTER, and PACIFIC OPEN SPACE, INC. LETTER) for the improvements are filed with the City Clerk. Although separately bound, the plans and specifications are a part of this report and are included in it by reference.

PART B - An Amended Estimated Cost of the Assessment District.

PART C - Assessment Roll - An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvement on each benefited parcel of land within the assessment district.

PART D - Method of Apportionment of Assessment - A statement of the method by which the undersigned has determined the amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel.

PART E - List of Property Owners - A list of the names and addresses of the owners of real property within this assessment district, as shown on the last equalized assessment roll for taxes, or as known to the Clerk. The list is keyed to Exhibit "C" by assessment number.

Page 3 ends

PART F - Assessment Diagram - A diagram showing all of the parcels of real property within this assessment district. The diagram is keyed to Part "C" by assessment number.

Respectfully submitted,
City of San Rafael
By ______________________________________
Joanna Kwok, City of San Rafael, City Engineer
PART A

Page 4 ends

Background:

Plans for the maintenance and improvement of the lagoon are the monitoring portions of the report prepared by Western Ecological Services Company, Inc., dated May 31, 1996 and titled REVISED PROPOSAL FOR 1998 and 1999 BUDGET FOR SPINNAKER LAGOON MANAGEMENT, the Letter Report prepared November 28, 1999 by Wetlands Research Associates, Inc., the Letter Proposal prepared by Pacific OpenSpace dated August 9, 1999, and subsequent documents and contracts between Pacific OpenSpace and the City of San Rafael. These documents have been filed previously with the clerk of the legislative body and are incorporated in this report by reference.

The actual eradication of the cattails has been handled directly through a City contract. Several years ago, the City obtained a number of preliminary proposals to completely eliminate the cattails from the entire lagoon. At that time, the estimated cost to do this work was $90,000. Since the Assessment District was not able to fund the amount from a single annual assessment, the City developed a program to complete a portion of the eradication each year on an on-going basis, thereby arresting future expansion of the cattail area and slowly reclaiming the lagoon from the emerging cattail areas. In addition, the City also began replanting some areas with native vegetation.

The fund to eradicate exotic plants has remained constant with no additional allocation. The fund value is currently $55,000.00.

In past years, additional weed abatement was performed by Pacific OpenSpace, Inc. under the direction of the City. The Pacific OpenSpace maintenance crew performed weed control in the form of mowing at Baypoint Lagoon during 2005. The major focus of their work was the eradication of broadleaf perennials, such as bristly ox-tongue (Picris echioides) and fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), as well as perennial weeds such as Harding grass (Phalaris aquatica). The most recent maintenance mowing by Pacific OpenSpace took place on March 21, 2006 followed by spraying of broadleaf weeds on May 15, 2006. In 2006 the contract between the City and Pacific OpenSpace lapsed, and the second mowing was not completed with Assessment District funds. No mowing using Assessment District funds occurred during the 2016-2017 fiscal year.

The Homeowners Association has continued to take an active role in managing and directing the Assessment District. Representatives from the Homeowners Association have met on numerous occasions with the District Engineer, the City’s engineering staff and the City’s maintenance staff regarding the management and operations of the lagoon and surrounding open area. These meetings started a number of years ago and have continued, allowing the homeowners to gain expertise and insight into the original intentions of the Assessment District and develop ideas and plans to make the best use of the Assessment District funds. The most recent discussion took place in 2023.

Based on the active role that the homeowners have taken, much of the annual landscape control maintenance work that had previously been completed by the District is being paid for directly by the Homeowners Association. This includes the annual or bi-annual mowing around the lagoon.

In early 2015, the Baypoint homeowners approached Nader Mansourian, then Director of Public Works, with two concerns relative to the assessment district. The first concern was the seemingly hopeless task of obtaining adequate funds to replace and upgrade the City of San Rafael’s Cayes Storm Water Pump Station, and the second, the more immediate need, to address the odor nuisance from the Lagoon.

PART A

Page 5 ends

First Concern:

Since 2006, the Assessment District has set aside money every year to fund improvements to the Cayes Storm Water Pump Station. The amount of set aside started small, $5,000.00, and has increased to approximately $15,000.00 annually. However, in Fiscal Year 2018-2019 maintenance to clean the pump station and outfall was undertaken which reduced Cayes Pump Fund (see below).

The amount set aside is designated to fund the control improvements to the pump station to bring the control system up to date and allow a more automated control of the water level to reduce the potential for hot weather odors and algae growth. The cost of the controls system has increased steadily over the years, and there has never been a formal assessment of the specific control system improvements needed to automate the system. The Homeowners Association would like to work with the City to use District funds to undertake a formal study to determine the feasibility, cost, and potential benefit of enhancing the control systems at the Cayes Storm Water Pump Station, with specific emphasis on alleviating the unpleasant odors which emanate from the lagoon. As noted below, this more pressing need (odor control) has been the focus of the homeowners, and the funds normally anticipated to be added to the fund from 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 assessments have been used for other benefits. Nevertheless, a minimum of an additional $10,000 allocation is suggested for the each of the coming years.

Second Concern:

In the summer of 2014, the odor complaints continued to get worse, and the funding for the improvements to the Cayes Storm Water Pump Station continued to be short of what was needed to fund the pump station improvements. Members of the Assessment District approached the City and requested that funds from the district be allocated to further study options to control the odor.

In January, 2015, the City Council, acting on the request from the members of the Assessment District, authorized the Public Works Director to engage Siegel Environmental to study the problem and suggest solutions to the odor problems that might be accomplished without changing the controls at the pump station. The cost of the study was $35,485.00, and the members of the Assessment District agreed to fund this out of the set aside funds available in the district. The study was completed in February, 2016, and the District paid the appropriate invoices.

The result of this work reduced the overall funds available. Since the work was environmentally driven, the District paid for the study from the set-asides allocated as the Environmental Monitoring Fund. This reduced the Environmental monitoring fund to $31,515.00. For the subsequent two years the set-aside from the District has continued to grow this balance.

Cayes Storm Water Pump Station: The City and homeowners continue to desire to add motor controls to better regulate the level of the lagoon. This would require that additional control devices be integrated into the Cayes Storm Water Pump Station. The District is allocating $10,000.00 of next year’s expenditures toward further analysis of the Cayes Storm Water Pump Station controls.

Eradication of Exotic Plants & Environmental Monitoring Funds: Over the past several years the Public Works staff have gained specialized knowledge on how to manage the lagoon water quality through manually controlling the water levels via charging and discharging storm and bay water. As a result of this work by staff, the prior concerns of exotic plants and environmental monitoring has dissipated and, in their place, a more holistic approach to the overall habitat of the District has taken root. To better align the funds being set aside for future needs of the District, both staff and PART A

Page 6 ends

representatives of the Baypoint Lagoon HOA recommend combining the two outdated funds, Eradication of Exotic Plants Fund and Environmental Monitoring Fund, into a single fund titled Habitat Protection Fund. These changes are reflected in Part B – Estimate of Costs.

Previous Year’s Activities
Consult previous year’s Engineer Reports for activity details. 2024 – 2025 Activities
The City has continued to regulate the water levels in the lagoon, which has minimized the odor complaints in the area and facilitated the recharge of the lagoon levels. In addition to manually regulating water levels for both stormwater control and odor regulation, the City Staff again cleaned out both the pipe that discharge into the lagoon and the pipe that connects the salt marsh to the lagoon. As noted in previous years, this manual effort would ideally be replaced by an automatic pump control that could be monitored by the Department of Public Works (DPW). Additionally, DPW staff invested considerable time and resources into procuring a floating island of carefully selected plants that will further improve the quality of the lagoons.

Floating islands offer a sustainable and effective solution for improving water quality and enhancing aquatic habitats. These engineered floating wetlands mimic natural processes by providing a buoyant platform supporting plant growth and fostering microbial activity. The plant roots extend into the water column, creating a large surface area that facilitates the removal of pollutants through sedimentation and microbial uptake. This design effectively captures nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus, which are common contributors to water pollution and algal blooms. Research has demonstrated the efficacy of floating treatment wetlands in a variety of settings. Staff research included work done in North Carolina where it was found that retrofitting stormwater detention ponds with floating islands led to significant reductions in pollutants, including up to 99% reduction in ammonia and 95% in total suspended solids. Additionally, these systems provide valuable habitat for wildlife, support biodiversity, and aid in restoring aquatic ecosystems.

The installation of the island and follow-up analysis and support are planned for the 2025 summer.

While the District recognizes the Pump Station Control Fund is not capable of funding the requested pump station control upgrade on its own, it will continue to make moderate contributions to support this eventual upgrade. The District also recognizes others outside the District will benefit from the proposed pump station control and, therefore, is not planning to cover the entire cost of the pump station control upgrade. The Pump Station Control Fund is expected to have a balance of $100,470.00 on June 30, 2025.

Previously many residents of Baypoint Lagoons approached the City with concerns about vegetation and invasive species as well as water quality. This past year the City initiated a landscape design project for the District with the local firm WRA, resulting in newly proposed vegetation plan and potential irrigation updates for the surrounding area. The City expects to continue to work with the residents of the lagoon on any potential implementation of the design work from this landscape project. Future determinations on funding for any implementation of work is ongoing. The Eradication of Exotic Plants Fund has been combined with the Phase II Environmental Monitoring Fund, into a newly titled Habitat Protection Fund, which is expected to have a balance of $110,839 on June 30, 2025.

PART B

ESTIMATE OF COSTS

Page 7 ends

District Status:

Total Estimated Fund Balance June 30, 2024 (per 2024-25 report) $224,432 Adjustment to match Estimated funds to Actual City Records $10,987 Actual Available Funds on July 1, 2024 $235,419
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ACTIVITY 2024-2025:

Assessment District Revenues:

Assessment District Proceeds $25,368
Interest $8,838
Total District Revenues: $34,206
Assessment District Expenditures through March 31:

Additional Floating Island Installation Costs $3,000
Staff Time $3,500
Contractual Services - WRA Landscape Design $13,767
Total District Expenditures: $42,203
Total Projected Available Funds on July 1, 2025 $227,421 PROJECTED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ACTIVITY 2025-2026:

Assessment District Revenues:

Assessment District Proceeds $25,368
Interest $9,103
Total District Revenue: $34,471
Assessment District Expenditures:

Unallocated Assessments (2024-2025) $1,268
Buffer Zone Landscaping Design and Irrigation Project Continuation $10,000 County Administrative Fees $290
Staff Time $8,000
Maintenance of Island Installation $1,500
Total District Expenditures: $21,058
PART B

ESTIMATE OF COSTS

Page 8 ends

Assessment District Fund Balances:

Pump Station Control Fund $100,470
Pump Station Control Fund Contribution for FY 2025-26 $10,000 Habitat Protection Fund (combined Monitoring and Plant Eradication funds) $110,839 Combined Fund Balance $221,309
Unallocated Funds on July 1, 2024 $6,112
Unallocated Funds FY 2024-2025 $3,413
Estimated Unallocated Funds Balance June 30, 2025 $9,525 Total Projected Available Funds on June 30, 2026: $240,834

END OF PART B
PART C

ASSESSMENT ROLL

Page 9 ends

See attachment titled “Part C – Assessment Roll.”
The lines and dimensions of each parcel are as shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County of Marin.

Property descriptions are lot or parcel numbers as shown on the recorded final maps of Baypoint Lagoons, recorded: in Book 20 of Maps at Page 80, and Book 21 of Maps at Page 34, Book 21 of Maps at Page 55, and Record Maps Book 1998 at Page 99, Marin County Records.

PART D

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT

Page 10 ends

There are 193 single family dwelling units existing within the Assessment District boundary. (NOTE: This is a reduction from 207 originally included. The reduction is based on the actual number of lots recorded and is appropriate.)
Subdivision Phase I consists of 89 lots, of which lot 20 anticipates low cost housing (not single family) and lots 1 through 19 and 21 through 89 anticipates one single family dwelling unit each.

Subdivision Phase II consists of 41 lots and anticipates one single family dwelling unit each.

Subdivision IIIa consists of 22 lots and anticipates one single family dwelling unit each.

Subdivision IIIb consists of an additional 42 units, one single family dwelling unit each.

The “Remaining” 12 lots were not created and have been removed from the assessment.

The number of single family dwelling units is:

Phase I......................................................................................... 88 Phase II....................................................................................... 41 Phase IIIa.................................................................................... 22 Phase IIIb ................................................................................... 42 TOTAL:......................................................................................193 Each of the single family dwelling unit lots are assessed for equal portions of the totala ssessment.

The total assessment for Baypoint Lagoons was set at $25,367.92. The District formation documents did provide for any increase in this amount. Each residential parcel will be assessed 1/193 of the total assessment or $131.44 ($25,367.92/193).

This assessment is exempt from the procedures and requirements of the (recently enacted Proposition 218) California Constitution, Article 13D, Section 4 pursuant to the exemption contained in Article 13D, Section 5(d) [previously majority voter approval or] Section 5(b) [petition signed by persons owning all the property]. The benefits are entirely special benefits and there are no general benefits. Additionally, the proposed assessment is the same assessment as last year.

Assessment Parcels 1 through 19, 21 through 89, 104-3 through 104-11-1, 104-12 through 104-37, 104-39 through 104-47-1, 104-51-1 through 104-51-12, 104-51-14, 104-51-16, 104-51-18, 104-51- 20, 104-51-22, 104-51-24, 104-51-26 through 104-51-28, 104-51-30, 104-51-34-1, 104-51-35-1, 104- 51-36-1, 104-51-37-1, 104-51-38-1, 104-51-39-1, 104-51-41-1 through 104-51-77 are each assessed 1/193 of the total assessment.

Assessment Parcels 20-1 and 20-2, 90 through 104-1,104-38-1, 104-49, 104-51-13, 104-51-15-1, 104-51-31 through 104-51-33, 104-51-34-2, 104-51-35-2, 104-51-36-2, 104-51-37-2, 104-51-38-2, 104-51-39-2, 104-51-40-1, 105 and 106 each have zero ($0.00) assessment.

The following changes were made to the Assessment Rolls and Assessment Diagram in the 2004- 2005 Baypoint Lagoons Annual Engineer’s Report due to Mapping Changes at the Marin County Assessor's Office:

PART D

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT

Page 11 ends

On May 6, 2005 our office contacted the Marin County Assessor's Office due to obvious changes to the Assessor's Parcel Maps for the Baypoint Lagoons development. According to information received from Mapping Department staff, in calendar year 2004 several Applications for Parcel Merger were received by the County of Marin from representatives of Baypoint Lagoons Homeowners Association. The following parcels were affected by the Parcel Merger Applications:

Assessment Numbers 91, 95, 101 and 102, all zero ($0.00) assessment parcels, were merged into a single parcel assigned APN 009-361-24 by the Marin County Assessor's Office.

Assessment Number 91 has been changed to 91-1 and reflects the new APN. Assessment Numbers 95, 101 and 102 have been removed from Parts C and E of this Report.

Assessment Numbers 92, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118 and 119, all zero ($0.00) assessment parcels, were merged into a single parcel assigned APN 009-362-49 by the Marin County Assessor's Office. Assessment Number 92 has been changed to 92-1 and reflects the new APN. Assessment Numbers 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118 and 119 have been removed from Parts C and E of this Report.

Assessment Numbers 96, 97, 98, 120, 121, 122, 123 and 124, all zero ($0.00) assessment parcels, were merged into a single parcel assigned APN 009-362-23 by the Marin County Assessor's Office. Assessment Number 96 has been changed to 96-1 and reflects the new APN. Assessment Numbers 97, 98, 120, 121, 122, 123 and 124 have been removed from Parts C and E of this Report.

Assessment Numbers 99, 100 and 104-2, all zero ($0.00) assessment parcels, were merged into a single parcel assigned APN 009-372-28 by the Marin County Assessor's Office. Assessment Number 99 has been changed to 99-1 and reflects the new APN. Assessment Numbers 100 and 104-2 have been removed from Parts C and E of this Report.

Assessment Numbers 104-38, 104-40, 104-44, 104-46, 104-47-2, 104-48, 104-48-1 and 104-50, all zero ($0.00) assessment parcels, were merged into a single parcel assigned APN 009-390-64 by the Marin County Assessor's Office. Assessment Number 104-38 has been changed to 104-38-1 and reflects the new APN. Assessment Numbers 104-40, 104-44, 104-46, 104-47-2, 104-48 and 104-50 have been removed from Parts C and E of this Report.

Assessment Numbers 104-51-15, 104-51-17, 104-51-19, 104-51-21, 104-51-23, 104-51-25 and 104-51-29, all zero ($0.00) assessment parcels, were merged into a single parcel assigned APN 009-412-20 by the Marin County Assessor's Office. Assessment Number 104-51-15 has been changed to 104-51-15-1 and reflects the new APN. Assessment Numbers 104-51-17, 104-51- 19, 104-51-21, 104-51-23, 104-51-25 and 104-51-29 have been removed from Parts C and E of this Report.

Assessment Numbers 104-51-40, 104-51-41-2, 104-51-42-2, 104-51-45-2, 104-51-46-2, 104-51- 47-2, 104-51-48-2, 104-51-49-2 and 104-51-50, all zero ($0.00) assessment parcels, were merged into a single parcel assigned APN 009-420-71 by the Marin County Assessor's Office.

Assessment Number 104-51-40 has been changed to 104-51-40-1 and reflects the new APN.

Assessment Numbers 104-51-41-2, 104-51-42-2, 104-51-45-2, 104-51-46-2, 104-51-47-2, 104- 51-48-2, 104-51-49-2 and 104-51-50 have been removed from Parts C and E of this Report.

PART E

LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS

Page 12 ends

See attachment titled “Part E – List of Property Owner.” PART F

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM

Page 13 ends

See attachment titled “Part F – Assessment Diagram”

SPECIAL

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

AMOUNT OF

ASSESSMENT

PROPERTY

DESCRIPTION

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER
1 $131.44 1 009-361-06
2 $131.44 2 009-361-05
3 $131.44 3 009-361-04
4 $131.44 4 009-361-03
5 $131.44 5 009-361-02
6 $131.44 6 009-361-08
7 $131.44 7 009-361-09
8 $131.44 8 009-361-10
9 $131.44 9 009-361-11
10 $131.44 10 009-361-12
11 $131.44 11 009-361-17
12 $131.44 12 009-361-16
13 $131.44 13 009-361-15
14 $131.44 14 009-361-14
15 $131.44 15 009-361-13
16 $131.44 16 009-361-19
17 $131.44 17 009-361-20
18 $131.44 18 009-361-21
19 $131.44 19 009-361-22
20-1 $0.00 20 009-371-02
20-2 $0.00 Portion of 20 009-371-03
21 $131.44 21 009-372-01
22 $131.44 22 009-372-02
23 $131.44 23 009-372-03
24 $131.44 24 009-372-04
25 $131.44 25 009-372-05
26 $131.44 26 009-372-06
27 $131.44 27 009-372-07
28 $131.44 28 009-372-08
29 $131.44 29 009-372-09
30 $131.44 30 009-372-10
31 $131.44 31 009-372-11
32 $131.44 32 009-372-12
33 $131.44 33 009-372-13
34 $131.44 34 009-372-14
35 $131.44 35 009-372-15
36 $131.44 36 009-372-26
PART C

ASSESSMENT ROLL

SPECIAL

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

AMOUNT OF

ASSESSMENT

PROPERTY

DESCRIPTION

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER
37 $131.44 37 009-372-27
38 $131.44 38 009-372-25
39 $131.44 39 009-372-24
40 $131.44 40 009-372-23
41 $131.44 41 009-372-22
42 $131.44 42 009-372-21
43 $131.44 43 009-372-20
44 $131.44 44 009-372-18
45 $131.44 45 009-372-19
46 $131.44 46 009-362-03
47 $131.44 47 009-362-04
48 $131.44 48 009-362-05
49 $131.44 49 009-362-13
50 $131.44 50 009-362-12
51 $131.44 51 009-362-14
52 $131.44 52 009-362-15
53 $131.44 53 009-362-16
54 $131.44 54 009-362-17
55 $131.44 55 009-362-18
56 $131.44 56 009-362-19
57 $131.44 57 009-362-20
58 $131.44 58 009-362-21
59 $131.44 59 009-362-10
60 $131.44 60 009-362-09
61 $131.44 61 009-362-06
62 $131.44 62 009-362-22
63 $131.44 63 009-362-25
64 $131.44 64 009-362-26
65 $131.44 65 009-362-30
66 $131.44 66 009-362-31
67 $131.44 67 009-362-32
68 $131.44 68 009-362-33
69 $131.44 69 009-362-34
70 $131.44 70 009-362-29
71 $131.44 71 009-362-35
72 $131.44 72 009-362-38
73 $131.44 73 009-362-39
74 $131.44 74 009-362-42

SPECIAL

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

AMOUNT OF

ASSESSMENT

PROPERTY

DESCRIPTION

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER
75 $131.44 75 009-362-43
76 $131.44 76 009-362-46
77 $131.44 77 009-373-11
78 $131.44 78 009-373-14
79 $131.44 79 009-373-15
80 $131.44 80 009-373-18
81 $131.44 81 009-373-19
82 $131.44 82 009-373-01
83 $131.44 83 009-373-02
84 $131.44 84 009-373-03
85 $131.44 85 009-373-04
86 $131.44 86 009-373-08
87 $131.44 87 009-373-07
88 $131.44 88 009-373-06
89 $131.44 89 009-373-05
90 $0.00 Portion of Parcel A 009-010-34
(Shoreline Park)
91-1 $0.00 Parcels B, F, L & M 009-361-24
92-1 $0.00
Parcel C & Lots L46, L61,
L60, L62, L63, L64, L70, L71,
L72, L73, L74, L75 & L76
009-362-49
93 $0.00 Parcel D 009-362-11
94-1 $0.00 Parcel E 009-362-47
94-2 $0.00 Portion of Parcel E 009-373-22
96-1 $0.00 Parcels G, H & I & Lots L77,
L78, L79, L80 & L81 009-373-23
99-1 $0.00 Parcels C, J & K 009-372-28
103 $0.00 Parcel N 009-010-31
104-1 $0.00 Parcel A 009-390-01
104-3 $131.44 94 009-390-03
104-4 $131.44 95 009-390-04
104-5 $131.44 96 009-390-05
104-6 $131.44 97 009-390-06
104-7 $131.44 98 009-390-07
104-8 $131.44 99 009-390-08
104-9 $131.44 100 009-390-09
104-10 $131.44 101 009-390-10
104-11-1 $131.44 102 009-390-66

SPECIAL

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

AMOUNT OF

ASSESSMENT

PROPERTY

DESCRIPTION

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER
104-12 $131.44 103 009-390-12
104-13 $131.44 104 009-390-13
104-14 $131.44 105 009-390-14
104-15 $131.44 106 009-390-15
104-16 $131.44 107 009-390-16
104-17 $131.44 108 009-390-17
104-18 $131.44 109 009-390-61
104-19 $131.44 110 009-390-19
104-20 $131.44 111 009-390-20
104-21 $131.44 112 009-390-21
104-22 $131.44 113 009-390-22
104-23 $131.44 114 009-390-23
104-24 $131.44 115 009-390-24
104-25 $131.44 116 009-390-25
104-26 $131.44 117 009-390-26
104-27 $131.44 118 009-390-27
104-28 $131.44 119 009-390-28
104-29 $131.44 120 009-390-29
104-30 $131.44 121 009-390-30
104-31 $131.44 122 009-390-31
104-32 $131.44 123 009-390-63
104-33 $131.44 124 009-390-51
104-34 $131.44 125 009-390-34
104-35 $131.44 126 009-390-35
104-36 $131.44 127 009-390-36
104-37 $131.44 128 009-390-37
104-38-1 $0.00 Parcel B & Lots 128E, 129E,
132E, 133E & 134E 009-390-64
104-39 $131.44 129 009-390-39
104-41 $131.44 130 009-390-41
104-42 $131.44 131 009-390-42
104-43 $131.44 132 009-390-43
104-45-1 $131.44 133 009-390-65
104-47-1 $131.44 134 009-390-59
104-49 $0.00 Parcel D 009-390-49
104-51-1 $131.44 135 009-411-01
104-51-2 $131.44 136 009-411-02
104-51-3 $131.44 137 009-411-03

SPECIAL

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

AMOUNT OF

ASSESSMENT

PROPERTY

DESCRIPTION

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER
104-51-4 $131.44 138 009-411-04
104-51-5 $131.44 139 009-411-05
104-51-6 $131.44 140 009-411-06
104-51-7 $131.44 141 009-411-07
104-51-8 $131.44 142 009-411-08
104-51-9 $131.44 143 009-411-09
104-51-10 $131.44 144 009-411-10
104-51-11 $131.44 145 009-411-11
104-51-12 $131.44 146 009-411-12
104-51-13 $0.00 Parcel F 009-411-13
104-51-14 $131.44 147 009-412-01
104-51-15-1 $0.00 Lots 147E, 148E, 149E, 150E,
151E, 152E & 155E 009-412-20
104-51-16 $131.44 148 009-412-03
104-51-18 $131.44 149 009-412-05
104-51-20 $131.44 150 009-412-07
104-51-22 $131.44 151 009-412-09
104-51-24 $131.44 152 009-412-11
104-51-26 $131.44 153 009-412-13
104-51-27 $131.44 154 009-412-14
104-51-28 $131.44 155 009-412-15
104-51-30 $131.44 156 009-412-17
104-51-31 $0.00 156E 009-412-18
104-51-32 $0.00 Parcel G 009-412-19
104-51-33 $0.00 Portion of Parcel O 009-400-03
104-51-34-1 $131.44 157 009-420-45
104-51-34-2 $0.00 157E 009-420-46
104-51-35-1 $131.44 158 009-420-47
104-51-35-2 $0.00 158E 009-420-48
104-51-36-1 $131.44 159 009-420-49
104-51-36-2 $0.00 159E 009-420-50
104-51-37-1 $131.44 160 009-420-51
104-51-37-2 $0.00 160E 009-420-52
104-51-38-1 $131.44 161 009-420-53
104-51-38-2 $0.00 161E 009-420-54
104-51-39-1 $131.44 162 009-420-55
104-51-39-2 $0.00 162E 009-420-56

SPECIAL

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

AMOUNT OF

ASSESSMENT

PROPERTY

DESCRIPTION

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER
104-51-40-1 $0.00
Parcels H & I & Lots 163E,
164E, 167E, 168E, 169E,
170E & 171E
009-420-71
104-51-41-1 $131.44 163 009-420-57
104-51-42-1 $131.44 164 009-420-59
104-51-43 $131.44 165 009-420-10
104-51-44 $131.44 166 009-420-11
104-51-45-1 $131.44 167 009-420-61
104-51-46-1 $131.44 168 009-420-63
104-51-47-1 $131.44 169 009-420-65
104-51-48-1 $131.44 170 009-420-67
104-51-49-1 $131.44 171 009-420-69
104-51-51 $131.44 172 009-420-17
104-51-52 $131.44 173 009-420-18
104-51-53 $131.44 174 009-420-19
104-51-54 $131.44 175 009-420-20
104-51-55 $131.44 176 009-420-21
104-51-56 $131.44 177 009-420-22
104-51-57 $131.44 178 009-420-23
104-51-58 $131.44 179 009-420-24
104-51-59 $131.44 180 009-420-25
104-51-60 $131.44 181 009-420-26
104-51-61 $131.44 182 009-420-27
104-51-62 $131.44 183 009-420-28
104-51-63 $131.44 184 009-420-29
104-51-64 $131.44 185 009-420-30
104-51-65 $131.44 186 009-420-31
104-51-66 $131.44 187 009-420-32
104-51-67 $131.44 188 009-420-33
104-51-68 $131.44 189 009-420-34
104-51-69 $131.44 190 009-420-35
104-51-70 $131.44 191 009-420-36
104-51-71 $131.44 192 009-420-37
104-51-72 $131.44 193 009-420-38
104-51-73 $131.44 194 009-420-39
104-51-74 $131.44 195 009-420-40
104-51-75 $131.44 196 009-420-41
104-51-76 $131.44 197 009-420-42
104-51-77 $131.44 198 009-420-43

SPECIAL

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

AMOUNT OF

ASSESSMENT

PROPERTY

DESCRIPTION

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER
105 $0.00 Parcel P 009-010-34
106 $0.00 Parcel Q 009-010-35
TOTAL
ASSESSMENT $25,367.92
2 3
4 Part E - List of Property Owners

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 2024 NAME AND ADDRESS
1 8
9 10
5 6
7 14
11 12
13 Part E - List of Property Owners

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 2024 NAME AND ADDRESS
14 15
16 20-1
20-2
21 17
18 19
25 26
27 22
23 24
Part E - List of Property Owners

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 2024 NAME AND ADDRESS
27 31
32 33
28 29
30 37
38 39
34 35
36 40
Part E - List of Property Owners

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 2024 NAME AND ADDRESS
43 44
45 41
42 49
50 51
46 47
48 52
53 54
Part E - List of Property Owners

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 2024 NAME AND ADDRESS
55 56
57 54
61 62
63 58
59 60
67 68
64 65
66 Part E - List of Property Owners

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 2024 NAME AND ADDRESS
68 69
73 74
75 70
71 72
79 80
81 76
77 78
Part E - List of Property Owners

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 2024 NAME AND ADDRESS
85 86
87 82
83 84
91-1
92-1
93 88
89 90
94-1
94-2
Part E - List of Property Owners

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 2024 NAME AND ADDRESS
99-1
103
104-1
94-2
96-1
104-6
104-7
104-8
104-3
104-4
104-5
104-12
104-9
104-10
104-11-1
Part E - List of Property Owners

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 2024 NAME AND ADDRESS
104-12
104-13
104-14
104-18
104-19
104-20
104-15
104-16
104-17
104-24
104-25
104-21
104-22
104-23
Part E - List of Property Owners

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 2024 NAME AND ADDRESS
104-26
104-30
104-31
104-32
104-27
104-28
104-29
104-36
104-37
104-38-1
104-33
104-34
104-35
104-39
Part E - List of Property Owners

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 2024 NAME AND ADDRESS
104-43
104-45-1
104-47-1
104-39
104-41
104-42
104-51-3
104-51-4
104-51-5
104-49
104-51-1
104-51-2
104-51-6
104-51-7
104-51-8
Part E - List of Property Owners

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 2024 NAME AND ADDRESS
104-51-9
104-51-10
104-51-11
104-51-8
104-51-15-1
104-51-16
104-51-18
104-51-12
104-51-13
104-51-14
104-51-26
104-51-20
104-51-22
104-51-24
Part E - List of Property Owners

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 2024 NAME AND ADDRESS
104-51-27
104-51-28
104-51-33
104-51-34-1
104-51-34-2
104-51-30
104-51-31
104-51-32
104-51-36-2
104-51-37-1
104-51-37-2
104-51-35-1
104-51-35-2
104-51-36-1
Part E - List of Property Owners

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 2024 NAME AND ADDRESS
104-51-37-2
104-51-39-2
104-51-40-1
104-51-41-1
104-51-38-1
104-51-38-2
104-51-39-1
104-51-45-1
104-51-46-1
104-51-47-1
104-51-42-1
104-51-43
104-51-44
104-51-48-1
104-51-49-1
Part E - List of Property Owners

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 2024 NAME AND ADDRESS
104-51-52
104-51-53
104-51-54
104-51-49-1
104-51-51
104-51-58
104-51-59
104-51-60
104-51-55
104-51-56
104-51-57
104-51-61
104-51-62
104-51-63
Part E - List of Property Owners

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 2024 NAME AND ADDRESS
104-51-64
104-51-65
104-51-66
104-51-70
104-51-71
104-51-72
104-51-67
104-51-68
104-51-69
104-51-76
104-51-77
104-51-73
104-51-74
104-51-75
Part E - List of Property Owners

ASSESSMENT
NUMBER

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 2024 NAME AND ADDRESS
104-51-77
106
200
0 200

GRAPHIC SCALE
BAHIA DE RAFAEL UNIT 2

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL

PACIFIC COAST TITLE COMPANY OF MARIN
I

I SPINNAKER POINT
UNIT 2
\ \
~ o·
SPINNAKER POINT SPINNAKER POINT 8f
UNITS
SPINNAKER POINT j___ I I----_ ~ UNIT 4 --;J ~
N 69°32'00" W

14.91'
N 69°32'00" W

14.91'

6. = 75·49•20~
R = 487.50'
L = 645.13'

I SPINNAKER POINT
UNIT 3 6. = 103°56'08"
R = 150.00'
N 90°00'00" E --l---

16.85'
L = 272.1 O' 6. = 72"56'22" _
R=265.½0'

6. = 14•32'33•
,,. --.....,.,. L = 337.35' 6. = 84.54'
. "-- R = 200.00'
- - L = 296.39'
s 20·28'00· w

73.58'
= 47°33'09"
= 175.00'
= 145.24'
...

6. = 55·49'37"
R = 173.91'
L = 199.80'

6. = 47°05'03"
R = 184.13'
L = 151.31'

6. = 17°09' 49•
R = 499.93'
L = 149.76'
PARCEL •a•

6. = 25·25•12·
R = 239.68'
L = 110.52'
~ 86°29'10" E
. 185.37' -
R = 600.00' SEE SHEET
= 50·03•01
= 150.0 '
= 131

SEE SHEET
NO. 8
L = 152.29' NO. 6 'l;

6. = 52·47•45•
R = 130.53'
L = 143.07'

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
---
--
(Lagoon)
N 90"00'00" E

17.93'

6. = 115·57•00·
R = 55.00'
L = 111.30'
S 46°25'00" E

50.55'

REMAINDER
PARCEL •o•

6. = 82·02'12·
R = 320.00'
L = 458.18'

6. = 110•23•53•
R = 80.00'
L = 154.14'

REMAINDER
PARCEL •o•
b
0 0
"""
0 w
b
0 b
p
0 0
z
~
~ Q:_
lb
.s;;
~
~ in
lO
ti C'i
~IX)
CN
8 0
z
!z
w
~w
ffl b w.P
ffl~
<( 0
I
"
<(
"
...I
w
~
z
I
I
..

P-1
...II
w

37.50' D..
~
,....--1162. 76'--...._
N 90°00'00" W
200.26'

6. = 54·59•03•
R = 587.50'
L = 666.33'
in
0 0
CN
r')
b
0 b
p
0 0
z
::,.._
"
Q::i
--.I
l,.j
I.,_
"
"
Cl::
<:
"
V)

PORTION
PARCEL •A•
---
I
\ ---
---
\
J

LOCATION MAP

NO SCALE
LEGEND:

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY ------------
REVISED 5/05: REVISIONS TO ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK PAGES:
009-01, 009-36, 009-37, 009-39,
009-41 & 009-42
REVISED 6/99: SEGREGATION OF PORTION OF PARCEL "O"
ADDED SHEET 8 .

REVISED 6/97: SEGREGATION OF PORTION OF PARCEL "O"
ADDED SHEET 7.

REVISED 6/95: SEGREGATION OF PORTION OF PARCEL "O"
ADDED SHEET 6.

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM

BA YPOINT LAGOONS

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
LANDS OF SPINNAKER POINT DEVELOPMENT, INC.

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
DOCUMENT NO. 89-60702

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL

MARIN COUNTY
SCALE : 1" - 200'

CALIFORNIA
REVISED MAY 2005
csw
[St]2 CSW/STUBER-STROEH
ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.

CONSUL TING ENGINEERS
790 Delong Ave., Novato, CA. 94945-3246
(415) 892-4763 FAX (415) 892-4502 Sheet 1 of 8
B-l(DDB'.01 \490000\AD1
Part F – Assessment Diagram
60 0 60

GRAPHIC SCALE
--------- ---------
--
fl
IJ
ti ~I :
0 If)
p
<O
0 1
l
'
\
/J
~ g
'<I- .) ,-.
....:
'<I-
,.,,
l-0
~
~ cf
iJ
.o
,-. !J ~ fV
'<I- ff ,-.
~ l t &
,.;:;
i:zf~~
fl ~ Cv \<'.
~f,,
V)~ ~ '1' ~ ~ fl Co~
~
i
SHEET5

PACIFIC COAST TITLE COMPANY OF MARIN
-- r---- --------- 35
;------ --!_4 --------- ~ 33 --------- _ I j-.._ SPINNAKEi~'OINT UNIT NO. 2 / --------- 17 'APS BO
516.5;,, 32 ----------- I
o.oo· @
N 14"21'00" E

55.77' j
N 75"39'00" w/

50.00'
S 77"21'19" E 47.16'
PARCEL "Q" - 106
9'o

7.68' w
t:i. = 48"11 '23"
R = 90.00'
L = 75.70'
1;;
Oi
0)
'<IPARCEL "Q" - 106
r
II
co
~
OJ
q_
NOTE:

CURVE TABLE

CURVE I
1 2
3 4
5 LEGEND:

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY

LOT NUMBER

PARCEL LINE
RADIUS

40.00'

20.00'

20.00'
640.00'
Common Area means those portions of the
subdivision owned or controlled by the Bay
Point Lagoons Association for the use and
enjoyment of the owners.

I
Exclusive Use Common Area shall be for the
exclusive use of the Owner of the designated
Lot and shall be appurtenant to that Lot. Each
owner shall have the exclusive right to use
the Exclusive Use Common Areas that have
been allocated to Owner's Lot in this Subdivision.

LENGTH I DELTA

38.50' 55"09'00"

31.42' go·oo·oo·

21.94' 01·57•52•
7 T
REVISED 5/05: REVISIONS TO ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK PAGES:
009-01, 009-36, 009-37, 009-39,
009-41 & 009-42
REVISED 6/97: SEGREGATION OF PORTION OF PARCEL "O"
ADDED SHEET 7.

REVISED 6/95: SEGREGATION OF PORTION OF PARCEL "O"
ADDED SHEET 6.

I{ •
a:: ~ PARCEL "Q" - 1 06

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM

BA YPOINT LAGOONS
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - O)"
0, :!:
_,.,.

9.) //
.o
..... " -..J
t:i. = 14 "13'09"
R = 150.07'
L = 37.24'
PARCEL "Q" - 106
LANDS OF SPINNAKER POINT DEVELOPMENT, INC.

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
DOCUMENT NO. 89-60702

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL

MARIN COUNTY CALIFORNIA
SCALE : 1" = 60' REVISED MAY 2005
C SW CSW/STUBER-STROE-t
[ St] 2 ENG!NEER!NG GROUP, INC.

CONSUL TING ENGINEERS
790 DeLong Ave., Novato, CA. 94945 Sheet 2 of 8
8-1608.2 \490000\AD2
40 0 40

GRAPHIC SCALE
I, I
I
. PACIFIC COAST TITLE COMPANY OF MARIN
_j\0dsl\DATA\Civil\1\490000\Ad3.dwg, 6/3/200..5 10:11:05 AM,Jrise, 1:40 @
17 20-2

1.14 ACRES
I
I SPINNAKER POINT UNIT NO. 3
18 MAPS 40
15 II 8 _, 0 I')
• v
;!: II
"' f" Q: I')
- ~ N II r--
<I fol
v
-N
" <O
II O
II g
<I g
v
I II
lk: 30'
Jo•
;;
~
fo // .If>_,
0,
~- -a
-a
11{2
<II')
II
Q:
kl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' 1{ fjt.. , 0-oo•
48 00'14•

1.55•
h@
;!;.,_ 12 , .. -co ..., a,...,_.49 :.,
fl fl 50 ,CV
"1 _,
- ---------- 8-4 '1'Po1,.,,.. - DRIVE:
:!? ~1.11 •

CURVE I
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
SPINNAKER POINT UNIT NO. 2
17 MAPS BO
61 S 75• •
60@)
59 N 20.85•
75•42•17•

CURVE TABLE

RADIUS I LENGTH I DELTA

71.00' 111.53' 90•00·00·

46.oo· 72.26' 90·00·00·
830.00' 17.41' 01i2'07"
370.00' 39.50' 06'07'00"
400.00' 42.70' 05·07•00·
430.00' 45.91' 06'07'00"

50.00' 21.27' 24·22•44•
255.00' 26.36' 05"55'19"
225.oo· 18.25' 04·3a•51•
430.00' 8.15' 01-05'10·

LINE TABLE

LINE I DIRECTION I DISTANCE
B N 35·44•21• E 21.37'
C S 14•21·00· W 4.9B'
D N 14·21'00• E 7.02'
E S 75·39•00• E 16.53'
F S 75'39'00" E 13.17'
G S 52'24'51" E 17.35'
~
-
63 <O ...J N ·• N 75 - ':39•0~
II
Q: Q:
~-• 0,
If) N
N Q " r-...

II II
...J ...J
0 Q • . ,.._ &.!O
co co
II f;;
Q: Q
II
----------
@
21 36
38 sH££T NO- 4
5[[
LEGEND:

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
~"'a rn t:m1 ~

LINE TABLE REFERENCE

CURVE TABLE REFERENCE

ASSESSMENT & LOT NUMBER

PARCEL LINE
I

MERGED COMMON AREA PARCELS
REVISED 5/05: REVISIONS TO ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK PAGES:
009-01, 009-36, 009-37, 009-39, 009-41 &
009-42 - MERGED COMMON AREA PARCELS
REVISED 6/97: SEGREGATION OF PORTION OF PARCEL •o•
ADDED SHEET 7.

REVISED 6/95: SEGREGATION OF PORTION OF PARCEL "O"
ADDED SHEET 6.

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM

BA YPOINT LAGOONS

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
LANDS OF SPINNAKER POINT DEVELOPMENT, INC.

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
DOCUMENT NO. 89-60702

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL

MARIN COUNTY
SCALE : 1" = 40'

CALIFORNIA
REVISED MAY 2005
C SW CSW/STUBER-SiROEH
[St] 2 ENGINEERING GROUP, IMC.

CONSUL TING ENGit'1EERS
790 DeLong l\ve., Novato, CA. 94945 Sheet 3 of 8
8-1608.3 \490000\AD3
If/
. <7 • & .. ' ·6'>,
36 @ 37
@)
25' /i "'" 73·01· I I .,. 16.14•
~25• ® 5s @59 ~ "'" 90·00· .,. 2 oo•
o.oo·
"'" 31.42• f "" 9o•o •
"'"20.0
"" 37.4
,_
,_
,..,_.
1'
fl //
_,
85©
@)
_, K. @
'
'>
71 @
: 23"04'79•
~ 46.37•
@ 79
75°? "" 26•-, v9'oo" ·~,,;,,,.-,, "" 41 <3'76 w -~· 70. oo· ,_--,,_ :J • • I::,. = 90'00'00" ~ ....... -- // 6- // _£> ':f!-
R = 20.00' / i-;Jf{.O
L = 31.42' S 75• 75•39 , ,. L'S:;;;,90"0.o'OO"
5 39•00" 57.6890 W . N 75•3
0-oo· £ 1::,. = 48"11'23"
1::,. = 90·00·00" R = 90_00, COMMON AR
R = 20.00· SEE SHEET NO. 6 L = 75. 10· PARCEL 'I'
L = 31.42' and P.D.E. - 96-1

PACIFIC COAST TITLE COMPANY OF MARIN
\\0dsl\DATA\Civil\4\49Q{l00\Ad4.dwg, 6/3/2005 10:16:28 AM, fri~L!:4~0~ _________ _ 47 PARCEL 'O' -106
APN 009-010-35
0 \!)
I/
'v
r

CURVE TABLE

CURVE I RADIUS I LENGTH I DELTA
1 100.00' 55.86' 32"00'17"
2 130.00' 39.21' 17i6'51"
3 115.00' 64.24' 32"00'17"
4 85.00' 32.26' 21·44•42•
5 67.00' 12.21' 10"26'27"
6 60.00' 82.89' 79"09'04"
7 46.00' 72.26' 90"00'00"
8 71.00' 111.53' 90-00·00·
9 115.00' 64.24' 32"00'17"
10 115.00' 61.11' 30"26'53"
11 115.00' 3.12' 01"33'24"
12 71.00' 51.68' 41"42'14"
13 255.00' 26.36' 05"55'19"
14 145.00' 8.01' 03i0'00"
15 130.95' 6.79' 02'58'13"
16 145.00' 27.21' 10"45'08"
17 615.00' 12.38' 01"09'11"
18 615.00' 25.22' 02°20'57"
19 615.00' 25.10' 02°20'19"
20 615.00' 30.03' 02·47'53•
21 615.00' 27.45' 02"33'25"
22 450.00' 3.68' 00"28'08"
23 450.00' 30.01' 03"49'14"
24 450.00' 45.16' 05·44•59•
25 450.00' 40.63' 05i0'21"
26 450.00' 16.04' 02·02•33•
27 150.00' 25.32' 09"40'14"
28 200.00· 29.92' 08"34'13"

LINE I DIRECTION I DISTANCE
A N 14"21'00" E 6.50'
B N 75•39•00• W 13.00'
C N 14"21'00" E 10.00'
D N 59·2r oo· E 19.06'
E S 69"06'33" W 18.78'
F N 14"21 '00" E 10.23'
G S 75"39'00" E 5.00'
H N 14"21'00" E 15.00'
I S 75'39'00" E 6.83'
J S 85i4'08" E 18.00'
K N 65"45'22" W 17.18'

UNETABLE
L N 64"32'40" E 7.81'
M S 52"24'51" E 28.87'
N S 11"46'25" W 10.87'
0 S 11•45•25• W 30.03'
p S 11"46'25" W 26.35'
40 Q s 08·20·20· w 15.44'
0 40

GRAPHIC SCALE
PARCEL 'O' - 106
APN 009-010-35
LEGEND:

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER

LINE TABLE REFERENCE
#-4,. t:71~~, .. § :t
@
®
CURVE TABLE REFERENCE @

ASSESSMENT & LOT NUMBER

PARCEL LINE
66 T

REVISED 6/95: SEGREGATION OF PORTION OF PARCEL "O"
ADDED SHEET 6.

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM

BA YPOINT LAGOONS

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
LANDS OF SPINNAKER POINT DEVELOPMENT, INC.

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
DOCUMENT NO. 89-60702

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL

MARIN COUNTY CALIFORNIA
SCALE : 1" = 40' REVISED MAY 2005
B-1608.4 \490000\AD4
t
g/
Q ------- ------- ;!
------- ------- ----.____ it'
----- -------- --

CITY OF SAN
2844 D.R.
' -------- ------- Iv --------
. I
SEE Ji c-HEET N0.4
16 @
4-5.oo•
s 75:J9•00• £ I
I
I
I
I
I
17 @
4-o.oo•
@)
20-2
I 1.14 ACRES
I
I
S 14"21'00• W

17.90·
s 5:J-9•00- £

7.3.55 @
20-1
.39 ACRES
0 I')
;;z:: I / 'F SAN RAFAEL
CITY 0. 274 12795 D.R.
40 40

OGRAPHIC SCALE

PACIFIC COAST TITLE COMPAN Y OF MARIN
I
I
I
I
18 @ 19
4o.o0• @ 24-8.a9•

56.49•
//
SEE JI c-HEET NO. 3
Q'.)
0)
• c._j 0) - (t) IO
"'"" C\/
'X? I')
I')
ci ,, 2 !'> ,....

C\/ ../
S££
Sh'££,,-
IV0..3
@) @ @) 21
22 @ C\/ &
23 //
II // ../ <J
../ <I
.32.1-a·
75• .

E
NOTE:
24 38
43(§) s 75•,39•00- £
5J.oo·
@
44 o.

Oo
;:._ 0
fll II)
:!: <o
"'
45 @
Por t.
10 ns of the
means those b the Bay Common Area d or controlledth: use and .. ·on owne . t· n for subd1v1s1 Assoc1a io Point Logoo~s the owne,s. holl be foe thed
ND·
LEGE . UNDARY
ASSESSME~T :;::~TN~:BER
~--<-:;:;:;::;;;;am~ ~

ASSESSORS

CURVE TABLE REFERENCE

ASSESSMENT &

PARCEL LINE
@)
G)

LOT NUMBER

MERGED COMMON AREA PARCELS
23 T
REVISED 5/05: OOK PAGES: SSESSOR'S MAP 839 009-41 & REVISIONS TO ~6 009-37, 019REA 'PARCELS oo9-01. oo~ERGED COMMON • -
REVISED 6/97:
009-42 - OF PARCEL 0
SEGREGATION OF 7 PORTION
REVISED 6/95:

ADDED SHEET • N OF PARCEL •o•
OF PORTIO SEGREEDG~~~~T 6. ADD

NT DIAGRAM ASSESSME LAGOONS

BA YPOINT NT DISTRICT
ASSESSME DINT DEVELOPMENT, INC .

OF SPINNAKER : CORPORATION
LANDS A CALIFORNI NO sg-60702
DOCUMENT .

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
CALIFORNIA enjo,.,,ent o Common Arno s the designate h
Exclusive Use f the Owner of to that Lot. Eac
exclusive use ~e appurtena~t ri ht to use
Lot and sholl the exclus,ve g thot hove .. n
ow er shall . e hove Use Common , Lot Are~s in th·,s Subdiv1s1on. the Exclus1v to Owners been allocated

MARIN COUNTY
SCALE : 1" = 40'
csw
[St] 2
REVISED M Ay 2005
790 DeLong Ave,,,,
B-1608.5
Sheet 5 of 8
\490000\AD5
R=665
~
~--=· ==~

PACIFIC COAST TITLE COMPANY OF MARIN
\\0dsl\DATA\Civil\4\490000\AD6.DWG, 6/3/2005 10:19:59 AM, frise, 1:40

46.89'
113.57'
R=7J5

BAYPOINT
~,::t
_/\ PARCEL'E'-94-1

VILLAGE
@
104
104-13
@
105
104-14
104-15
119
40 0 40

GRAPHIC SCALE
LEGEND:

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY ~ ~ ~ ~m

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
ASSESSMENT NUMBER 104-7
LOT NUMBER 107

PARCEL LINE

MERGED COMMON AREA PARCELS
REVISED 5/05: REVISIONS TO ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK PAGES:
009-01, 009-36, 009-37, 009-39,
REVISED 6/97:

REVISED 6/95:
009-41 & 009-42
SEGREGATION OF PORTION OF PARCEL "o•
ADDED SHEET 7.

SEGREGATION OF PORTION OF PARCEL •o•
ADDED SHEET 6.

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM

BA YPOINT LAGOONS

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
LANDS OF SPINNAKER POINT DEVELOPMENT, INC.

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
DOCUMENT NO. 89-60702

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL

MARIN COUNTY
SCALE : 1" = 40'

CALIFORNIA
REVISED MAY 2005
C SW CS'fl/STIJBER-STROEH
[St] 2 ENGJtJEE:RiNG Gi,ou?, INC.

CONSUL TING Ef'~GII\JEERS
790 Delong Ave., Novato, CA. 94945 Sheet 6 of 8
B-1608.6 \490000\AD6

CURVE I RADIUS I LENGTH
1 125.0000 4.3112
2 20.0000 32.1057
3 30.0000 34.5329
4 60.0000 9.7785
5 60.0000 15.9104
6 60.0000 9.3992
7 60.0000 25.7614
8 60.0000 8.2164
9 20.0000 21.1288
10 75.0000 38.3587
11 75.0000 18.6928
12 75.0000 21.4715
13 148.4500 13.0370
14 148.3251 40.5957
15 148.4500 45.2613
16 148.9539 29.7739
17 180.4921 11.4044
18 180.5300 23.9814
19 130.5300 17.3397
20 130.5300 8.2456
21 99.0195 19.7455
22 98.4500 8.6460
23 121.1492 10.5753
24 75.0000 10.9343
25 98.6563 30.0173
26 98.4500 26.9226
40 ...... ..._
0 40

GRAPHIC SCALE

PACIFIC COAST TITLE COMPANY OF MARIN
\\0ds1\DATA\Civil\4\490000\AD7.DWG, 6/3/2005 10:23:15 AM, frise, 1:40

I DELTA
01°58'34"
91°58'34"
65"57'11"
09·20·16"
15"11'36"
08"58'32"
24•35•01"
0750'46"
6(131'46"
29"18'14"
14"16'49"
16"24'11"
05·01 •54"
15"40'53"
1728'09"
11°27'10"
03"37'13"
0736'40"
0736'40"
03"37'1(1'
11"25'31"
05"01'54"
05·00•05"
08"21'12"
1725'58"
15·40•06"
147
D. = 11"13'50"
R = 130.53
L = 25.59
148
@ ®
--
--
D. = 49·39•39"
R = 98.45
L = 85.33

BAYPOINT
@) @)
140
139 !Tl~
V. ~ ~ ' g ~ a iS' ~ .,. q
--
--
DR-
®
141
~~ 0 ~ ~ q ~
--
--
--
~@
t.,.,
(.Jl
8,. 146
--
ffl
'
m
:z: 0, V,
p !=>;:;:;
0 ..;
QI) 0 <o - "1
I N29'25E
N7tiJOE
~ 44.88'

N,JO'OJE
v,44.66'
~ .
~
S1Z29E 19.00'
N79'25WE 120.00' N7t52'0oE
N7t30'03°E
PORTION OF PARCEL 'A"
ASSESSMBIITN0.90
AP .N. oc»-010-34
245.JJ'
355.32'
PORTION OF PARCEL "A" - NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND:

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER

CURVE TABLE REFERENCE

ASSESSMENT NUMBER

LOT NUMBER

PARCEL LINE

MERGED COMMON AREA PARCELS
--
@
@
104-7
145
REVISED 5/05: REVISIONS TO ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK PAGES:
009-01, 009-36, 009-37, 009-39, 009-41 &
009-42 - MERGED COMMON AREA PARCELS
REVISED 6/97: SEGREGATION OF PORTION OF PARCEL "On
ADDED SHEET 7.

REVISED 6/95: SEGREGATION OF PORTION OF PARCEL non
ADDED SHEET 6.

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM

BA YPOINT LAGOONS

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
LANDS OF SPINNAKER POINT DEVELOPMENT, INC.

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
DOCUMENT NO. 89-60702

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL

MARIN COUNTY
SCALE : 1 " = 40'
csw
[St] 2

CALIFORNIA
REVISED MAY 2005

CSW/STUBER-STROEH
ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.

CONSUL TING ENGINEERS
790 Delong Ave., Novoto, CA. 94945 Sheet 7 of 8
8-1608.7 \490000\AD7
104-51-38-2 104-51-39-2
LINE
L1
L2
L3
----
L4
L5
L6
L7
LB
L9
L10
C3
104-51-36-2 60.00'
@ 104-51-37-2
C ~ ~ en ~ IO
159£
.
104-51-69
r:;?:,. 190
~ .. •
104-51-
'6":.\ 189 0:,
160£
188
4-51-6

LINE TABLE

LENGTH BEARING

8.38 N74°10'43"E

12.08 S33"32'01"W

3.47 s10·35•oo"E

3.47 S10°35'00" E

12.08 S54°42'01"E

8.38 S84"39'17"W

8.38 N7 4· 1 O' 43'' E

12.08 S33"32'01"W

3.47 S10"35'00" E

3.47 S10"35'00" E
L11
L12
L13
L14
L15
L16
L17
L18
L19
L20
L21
L22'
'<IC38 LJO
(PRIVATE ST.)
L29
. , .
32 187
104-51-

12.08 8.38

7.93 15.94

14.11 35.31

16.99 17.73

30.00 16.81

27.09 125.69
-51-65
@
186
S54"42'01"E
S84"39'11'W
N79"25'00" E
N79"25'00" E
N22"31 '40"E
S86"29' 1 O" E
s10·35•oo"E
S15"06'13"W
N34°37'49"W
S10"35'00" E
S10"35'00"E
S10"35'00"E
\\0ds1\DATA\Civil\4\490000\ad8.dwg, 6/3/2005 10:29:29 AM, frise, 1:40 ss.50'
104-51-63
@ 184
-
5s.oo'
104-51-58
(@ 179
- ----
L23 56.82 N79"25'00" E
L24 55.00 N79"25'00" E
L25 26.00 N10"35'0o"W
L26 25.00 N10"35'00"W
L27 29.09 N 10"35'0o"W
L28 28.09 N10"35'0fi'W
L29 44.26 N88"49'00"W
L30 35.80 N88"49'00"W
L31 32.66 N79"25'00" E
L32 17.34 N79"25'00" E
L33 51.23 S30"59'56" E .
<:!.l ___,. q
t..:> vi
.f> tJl 00
-f>. o,.
f'1
168 -z.
...>
'cS CP q O"l vi .i;.\ . Ul. ___,. 0
g vi. o_
\ - a, ~
l..

E.L "N' -103
p~ ()()9-0\0-3\
- -
L34 51.01 N26"27'40"W
L35 50.00 N1707'29"W
L36 49.76 S06° 43'05" E
L37 29.81 S79"25'0o"W
L38 26.38 S49"40'00"W
L39 36.71 N20"07'59" E
<:!.l ___,. q ...> vi
- vi tJl 0 ·o 0 ~ o_ o,.
'" f'1 -('
~
@)
171
175
- -----

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY

ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER

LINE TABLE REFERENCE

CURVE TABLE REFERENCE

ASSESSMENT NUMBER

LOT NUMBER

PARCEL LINE

MERGED COMMON AREA PARCELS
- -

CURVE TABLE

CURVE RADIUS DELTA LENGTH
C1 184.13'
C2 184.13'
C3 184.13'
C4 134.13'
C5 134.13'
C6 239.68'
C7 189.68'
CB 239.68'
C9 249.87'
C10 199.87'
C11 249.87'
C12 199.87'
C13 249.87'
C14 199.87'
C15 199.87'
C16 249.87'
C17 249.87'
C18 130.00'
C19 80.00'
C20 80.00'
C21 80.00'
C22 42.00'
C23 42.00'
C24 42.00'
C25 42.00'
C26 59.99'
-----
0723'09" 23.74' C27 42.00' 35·43•33" 26.92'
19"32'04" 62.78' C28 55.00' 30"16'22'' 29.06'
20·09•4a" 64.80' C29 55.00' 08"23' 19" 8.05'
23"23'39" 54.77' C30 55.00' 21"53'02" 21.01'
15· 42'28" 36.77' C31 20.00' 90·00·00" 31.42'
13·12·11" 55.23' C32 20.00' 90·00·00" 31.42'
12" 18 '04" 40.72' C33 15.00' 78"14'00" 20.48'
13" 13'01" 55.29' C34 45.00' 28"57'29" 22.74'
06"24'51" 27.97' C35 45.00' 20"42'16" 16.26'
06"24'51" 22.38' C36 45.00' 16" 46'35" 13.18'
0741 '35" 33.55' C37 45.00' 11°47'40" 9.26'
0741 '35" 26.84' C38 315.00' 06"39'41" 36.62'
08"00'25" 34.92' C39 315.00' 05°06' 19" 28.07'
08"00'25" 27.93' C40 175.00' 12"06'21' 36.98'
08"43'36" 30.44' .C41 145.00' 23"18'42'' 59.00'
08"43'38" 38.06' C42 175.00' 11°56'2.3'' 36.47'
03"06'01" 13.52' C43 30.00' 65°57' 11" 34.53'
06"24'06" 14.52' C44 20.00' 91·5a•34• 32.11'
06"24'06" 8.94' C45 75.00' 14°16'49" 18.69'
10"40'03" 14.89'
93·19•44" 130.31'
33"06'40" 24.27'
56"53'20" 41.70'
52"42'35" 38.64'
36"06'35" 26.47'
35"32'18" 37.21'
REVISED 5/05: REVISIONS TO ASSESSOR'S MAP BOOK PAGES:
009-01, 009-36, 009-37, 009-39, 009-41 &
009-42 - MERGED COMMON AREA PARCELS
REVISED 7 /02: SEGREGATION OF PARCELS 104-51-34 THROUGH 104-51-39, 104-51-42, AND
104-51-45 THROUGH 104-51-49
REVISED 6/99: SEGREGATION OF PORTION OF PARCEL "O"
ADDED SHEET 8.

REVISED 6/97: SEGREGATION OF PORTION OF PARCEL "O"
ADDED SHEET 7.
- -
SEGREGATION OF PORTION OF PARCEL "O"
ADDED SHEET 6.
---- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM

BA YPOINT LAGOONS
@ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
L11
C27
104-7
163£
I
LANDS OF SPINNAKER POINT DEVELOPMENT, INC.

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
DOCUMENT NO. 89-60702

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL

MARIN COUNTY
SCALE : 1" = 40'

CALIFORNIA
REVISED MAY 2005

C SW CSW/STUBER-STROEH
[St] 2 ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.

CONSUL TING ENGINEERS
790 DeLong Ave., Novato, CA. 94945 Sheet 8 of 8
____________________________________________________________________________________

FOR CITY CLERK ONLY
Council Meeting:

Disposition: Resolutions
Agenda Item No: 4.i
Meeting Date: June 2, 2025

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Department: Public Works
Prepared by: April Miller, Director of Public Works
Bernadette Sullivan, Senior
Management Analyst
City Manager Approval: ________
TOPIC: POINT SAN PEDRO ROAD MEDIAN LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SUBJECT: POINT SAN PEDRO ROAD MEDIAN LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FY 2025-26
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommend that the City Council approve the following:

1. Adopt a resolution directing the filing of the Engineer’s FY 2025-26 Annual Report.

2. Adopt a resolution approving the Engineer’s FY 2025-26 Annual Report.

3. Adopt a resolution of intention to order improvement and set a public hearing on the annual assessment for the City Council meeting on June 23, 2025.

BACKGROUND:

In order to comply with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, which governs this assessment District, the City Council must approve an Engineer’s report for the Point San Pedro Median Landscaping Assessment District (“District”) annually. The District will allocate and levy annual assessments after a public hearing to be held this year on June 23, 2025.

In 2011, the Point San Pedro Road Median Landscaping District was formed to generate revenue to reconstruct, repair, and maintain the 29 median islands along Point San Pedro Road, from Union Street to Biscayne Drive. While the medians are located within the San Rafael City limits, pockets of unincorporated County of Marin regions are served by Point San Pedro Road. Therefore, the City and the County have a vested interest in and responsibility for the medians. The original medians were constructed half a century ago, but over time, their infrastructure decayed to the point of needing replacement. Moreover, due to significant staffing and budgetary cutbacks, landscaping maintenance for the medians before the formation of the assessment District had been reduced to vegetation trimming to control overgrowth. Over time, existing plants and irrigation infrastructure deteriorated significantly so that little of the original landscaping remained, besides some of the trees and vegetation that survived with little water.

As a result, a group of property owners near Point San Pedro Road (both within the City limits of the City of San Rafael and in the immediate contiguous unincorporated area of the County of Marin) organized an effort to form an assessment District to fund the capital costs associated with reconstruction and restoration of the landscaping within the Point San Pedro Road medians, as well as the ongoing SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 2
maintenance and operation of those improvements. As a part of the formation of the assessment District, the City of San Rafael and unincorporated portions of the County of Marin entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), which designated the City of San Rafael as the lead agency.

Since the formation of the District, the City has worked closely with several community members on the Point San Pedro Road Coalition’s Roadway Committee, who have assisted not only in recommendations and oversight of the medians but have also served as key community liaisons between the City and the residents within the assessment District. These community members have served as the “citizen’s oversight” committee for the District. Department of Public Works (DPW) staff routinely meet with these representatives, provide updates on the maintenance of the medians, and get feedback from the residents in the area. DPW staff also work closely with those community members on key decisions on financial planning for the assessment District.

The annual assessment has two components:

1. Capital debt service assessment
This amount is to finance the debt service associated with the large capital costs of reconstructing the medians in 2014. The total project cost was $1,703,245, including expenditures for design, construction, and construction management. The total amount bonded for the capital portion of the District was $1,750,000.

The 20-year debt service schedule in the Annual Engineer’s Report outlines the annual debt service payment for the assessment District. The average annual debt service is $144,942. When the District was formed, residents were allowed to prepay the capital portion of the assessment, and some chose this option.

2. Operations and maintenance assessment
This portion of the assessment is intended to fund the annual operations and maintenance portion of the assessment District. Operations and maintenance costs include:
• Monthly contractual maintenance for all 29 medians
• Landscaping repairs and plant replacement
• Irrigation system maintenance and repairs
• Utilities (water and electricity)
• Financial services for the administration of the assessment District (Engineer’s report) • Annual fee charged by the County of Marin Assessors’ Office for the assessments Total operation and maintenance costs for FY 2025-26 are projected to be $180,132.

From FY 2013-14 to FY 2017-18, the total annual assessment remained flat at $79.48. While the assessment stayed flat, the revenue generated did not keep up with the actual operations and maintenance costs for the 29 medians. The revenue generated under the $79.48 assessment for operation and maintenance costs was $82,814, while the actual operational cost was closer to $110,150.

Year after year, the difference was made up using a modest Operation and Maintenance Fund balance.

Though there was the ability to increase the total assessment by 3% each year, the City did not elect to bring forward an increase in prior years due to input from the citizen’s oversight committee (“committee”).

The City and committee agreed to first understand the issues and full costs associated with maintaining the relatively new medians to a standard that meets the community’s expectations before pursuing an increase in the assessment.

In recent years, the City and the committee have made considerable progress on resolving community concerns regarding maintenance expectations of the medians. Since FY 2018-19, the City and committee SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 3
have agreed on the need to raise the annual assessment up to the maximum allowable rate to bring the revenues generated from the annual assessment closer to the actual annual maintenance costs for the 29 medians.

The Assessment District, therefore, has two funds: An Operation and Maintenance Reserve Fund and a Capital & Debt Service Reserve Fund. The estimated year-end fund balances are as follows:

Fund
6-30-25 Fund
Balance
(Projected)
Operation and Maintenance
Reserve Fund #234
$233,894
Capital & Debt Service Reserve
Fund #714
$250,000
The Operations and Maintenance Reserve Fund #234 fund balance may be used for regular maintenance activities and broader improvements. The Capital and Debt Service Reserve Fund #714 is restricted for capital improvements related to the initial reconstruction of the medians.

Per the District formation documents, annual assessments can be increased up to 3% or the value of the Consumer Price Index (CPI), whichever is greater. The CPI as of February 2025 was 2.7% for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward region, which San Rafael uses to calculate inflation. Therefore, the City and committee are recommending a rate increase of 3% be applied for FY 2025-26, resulting in $117.70 per parcel per year (see chart below). This increase in revenue will offset the increased costs for maintenance and utilities (mostly water and electricity) for the District.

The assessment proposed for FY 2025-26 is the maximum allowable rate of $117.70. The assessment District does not need to return to the voters of the assessment District for approval of the increase per Proposition 218, as the increase is within the amount allowed for in the formation documents.

The FY 2024-25 assessment is composed of:

Debt Service Assessment (Not Prepaid)** $58.70 per EBU* Non-Bonded Assessment (annual
Operation and Maintenance costs)
$59.00 per EBU*
Total FY 2025-26 Assessment $117.70 per EBU*
*EBU = Equivalent Benefit Unit method of assessment apportionment establishes a basic unit (base value) of benefit and then calculates the benefit derived by each assessed parcel as a multiple (or a fraction) of the basic unit. The Engineer's Report outlines the EBU applies to other land uses, such as apartments and businesses.

When the assessment District was first established, property owners were allowed to make a prepayment for the improvement cost. Parcels that have prepaid or paid off their full assessment lien (bonded obligation) are no longer levied for the Debt Service Assessment but will continue to pay their proportionate share of the Non-Bonded Operation and Maintenance Assessment.

Each year, about 4% of assessments are uncollected, and therefore, annual revenues are typically slightly lower than anticipated.

The total proposed increase per parcel per year over last year’s rate is $1.72. The revenue generated from this increase will support the District’s operation and maintenance costs, and any remaining funds will be set aside for a potential capital reserve fund.

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 4
Assessment District Operations Expenditures:

Irrigation / Landscaping Repairs $25,000
Landscaping Contract Services $87,132
Utilities $37,000
City Staff Time (minus $16,726 contribution by City) $2,000 County Administrative Fees $9,000
Planting Work $10,000
Irrigation Renovation Assessment $10,000
Total District Expenditures: $180,132
This table and others can be found in the attached Engineer’s report. All Point San Pedro Road Median Landscaping Assessment District fees collected are legally restricted for use on the Point San Pedro medians and cannot be used for any other purpose.

FISCAL IMPACT:

All operation and maintenance reserve fund revenues and expenses are contained within the Point San Pedro Road Median Assessment District Fund #234. All debt service revenues and expenses are contained within the Point San Pedro Road Median Assessment District Fund #714.

The Public Works Department incurs General Fund staff costs for personnel who execute and manage the landscaping maintenance contract. Staff costs are also associated with the budgetary and financial management of the assessment District and coordination with the consultant who prepares the annual Engineer’s report. Per the MOU from 2011, the City has agreed to offset the City staff time associated with maintaining the assessment District as a City contribution to the District at an approximate cost of $16,239. The County makes an annual financial payment to the assessment District. For FY 2025-26, the County payment will be $9,537, which will be deposited into the District’s fund.

COMMUNITY OUTREACH:

The City continues to work closely with several community representatives of the Point San Pedro Road Coalition Roadway Committee who have served as the Citizen’s Oversight committee for the District.

The committee is in frequent and direct communication with the Public Works Department Parks Supervisor, who manages the median’s landscaping contractor. The committee works with the City, serving as the liaison to the community in relaying concerns and reporting issues when they arise, as community members are often the first eyes on issues with the medians. The committee also receives a weekly report from the maintenance contractor on work done on the medians and utilizes it to respond to inquiries from residents.

Each spring, the City meets with committee members to review the District’s financials and discuss various strategies to ensure that the District remains financially solvent over time.

After this meeting, the Committee members will post an annual note to the community updating residents on the District’s financial situation and maintenance priorities.

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS:

Landscaping and lighting District assessments are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Guidelines Section 15378 (b) (4) because government fiscal activities that do not involve any commitment to any specific project that may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment are not considered projects.

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT / Page: 5
OPTIONS:

The City Council has the following options to consider relating to this item:

1. Adopt the three resolutions as presented.

2. Provide direction to staff to modify any or all of the resolutions.

3. Do not adopt the resolutions. If the City Council does not adopt the resolutions, the public hearing will not take place, and the City cannot levy the annual assessment against property owners within the Assessment District.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Staff recommend that the City Council approve the following:

1. Adopt a resolution directing the filing of the Engineer’s FY 2025-26 Annual Report.

2. Adopt a resolution approving the Engineer’s FY 2025-26 Annual Report.

3. Adopt a resolution of intention to order improvement and set a public hearing on the annual assessment for the City Council meeting on June 23, 2025.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Resolution Directing the Filing of Engineer’s Annual report FY 2025-26

2. Resolution Approving the Engineer’s Annual Report FY 2025-26

3. Resolution of Intention to Order Improvements and Setting a Public Hearing on the Annual Assessment for the City Council meeting of June 23, 2025

4. Engineer’s Annual Report FY 2025-26

5. Engineer’s Report Part C

6. Engineer’s Report Part E

7. Engineer’s Report Diagram
RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION OF THE SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL DIRECTING
FILING OF ENGINEER’S ANNUAL REPORT FY 2025-2026

POINT SAN PEDRO ROAD MEDIAN LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
_________________________________________________
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL RESOLVES that:

1. Joanna Kwok, City Engineer for the Point San Pedro Road Median Landscaping Assessment District, City of San Rafael, Marin County, California, and is hereby directed to file with the City Clerk an annual report for fiscal year 2025-26 in accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

2. This resolution is adopted pursuant to Section 22622 of the Streets and Highways Code.

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION OF THE SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL APPROVING
ENGINEER’S ANNUAL REPORT FY 2025-26

1. Joanna Kwok, City Engineer for Point San Pedro Road Median Landscaping Assessment District, has filed with the City Clerk an Engineer’s Annual Report for fiscal year 2025-26 in accordance with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

2. The aforementioned Engineer’s Annual Report, on file with the City Clerk, is approved as filed.

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk
1 RESOLUTION NO.

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ORDER

IMPROVEMENTS AND SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2025

POINT SAN PEDRO ROAD MEDIAN LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT (Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
___________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, on June 20, 2011, the City Council of the City of San Rafael (the "City Council") adopted its resolution forming the Point San Pedro Road Median Landscaping Assessment District (the "District") and the levy and collection of assessments therein for the special benefits received by properties therein from the improvements related thereto.

WHEREAS, the improvements within the existing District are generally described as including, but not limited to, median islands along Point San Pedro Road, which are appurtenant thereto within and benefit properties within the District. .

WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 53753.5, a public agency that has complied with the notice, protest, and hearing requirements or is exempt from the procedures and approval process of section 53753 in establishing an assessment, need not follow those requirements in subsequent fiscal years where the assessment methodology is not changed to increase the assessment or the amount of the assessment proposed does not exceed an assessment formula or range of assessments adopted in accordance with Proposition 218 or section 53753.
2 WHEREAS, in accordance with this Council’s resolution directing the filing of an Engineer’s Annual Report, Joanna Kwok, City Engineer, has filed with the City Clerk the report required by Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution (“Proposition 218”) and Article 4 of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the “Act,” and together with Proposition 218, collectively, the “Assessment Law”).

All interested persons are referred to that Report for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of San Rafael, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Guidelines Section 15378 (b) (4), because government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment are not considered a project. 3 3. The public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District during the fiscal year 2025-26. The proposed assessment increases the assessment by $1.72 from the previous fiscal year, from $115.98 to $117.70 per EBU (Equivalent Benefit Unit), which is the maximum allowable assessment amount for the fiscal year 2025-26.

4. The District shall provide for the installation, construction or maintenance of any authorized improvements under the Act, including, but not limited to, medians which are appurtenant thereto, as well as the debt service associated with the 2014 capital improvements of the medians. Reference is made to the Engineer's Report on file in the office of the City Clerk for a more detailed description of the work to be done, the boundaries of the assessment district, the amount of the proposed assessments and the method of assessment.

5. On Monday, the 23rd of June, 2025 at the hour of 6:00 o’clock P.M., the City Council will conduct a public hearing on the question of the levy of the proposed annual assessment. Any and all persons shall be afforded the opportunity to hear and be heard and the City Council shall consider all oral statements and written protests made or filed by any interested person regarding the work proposed to be done or carried out, or why said assessments should not be levied in accordance with this resolution of intention.

Written protests must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the public hearing. The hearing will be held live at the San Rafael City Council Chambers and virtually through Zoom at the webinar location listed on the agenda online at https://www.cityofsanrafael.org/departments/public-meetings/, as well as streamed to YouTube at www.youtube.com/cityofsanrafael.
4 6. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give the notice of hearing by publishing a copy of this resolution once in the Marin Independent Journal, publication to be completed not less than ten (10) days before June 23, 2025.

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk

Page 1 ends

ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT
FOR

POINT SAN PEDRO MEDIAN

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
2025-2026

FOR THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL

CALIFORNIA

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JUNE 02, 2025
First Meeting
JULY 23, 2025
Second Meeting
Prepared By:

City of San Rafael

Page 2 ends

ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT
2025-2026

POINT SAN PEDRO MEDIAN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, MARIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed annual report as directed by the City Council.

DATED: ____________, 2025.

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Joanna Kwok, City of San Rafael, City Engineer
By ______________________________________

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Annual Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the ____________________ day of ___________________, 2025.

LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk, City of San Rafael, Marin County, California
By ______________________________________
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Annual Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Marin on the ____________________ day of ____________________, 2025.

LINDSAY LARA, City Clerk, City of San Rafael, Marin County, California
By ______________________________________

Page 3 ends

ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORT
2025-2026

POINT SAN PEDRO MEDIAN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT

CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, MARIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
The City of San Rafael has prepared this Annual Report to provide the Annual Engineer’s Report for the Point San Pedro Median Assessment District (PSPMAD) in ___________, 2025. The prior Engineers of Work, Wildan Financial Services (Wildan), had provided the formation report for PSPMAD and previous Annual Reports since PSPMAD’s formation in 2011 and CSW/Stuber-Stroeh Engineering Group, Inc. As the Engineer of work for PSPMAD, San Rafael, Marin County, California, the City is submitting this annual report, as directed by the City Council, by its Resolution No. ___________, adopted ______________, 2025.

The prior Engineer of Work, Wildan, prepared detailed annual reports from the 2011-2012 year through 2018-2019 year. We have included the 2018-2019 report as an appendix and included in this report to maintain continuity for year-to-year annual reports. The improvements which are the subject of this report are briefly described as follows:

The original landscaping for the twenty-nine (29) median islands along Point San Pedro Road and Third Street (hereafter, referred to collectively as the “Pt. San Pedro Road Medians” or “Medians”) were installed in connection with and for the benefit of the surrounding developments and properties that are directly adjacent to Point San Pedro Road and Third Street and/or serve as the primary access streets to those developments and properties. Pt. San Pedro Road traverses both within the City limits of the City of San Rafael and in the immediate contiguous unincorporated area of the County of Marin. No local funding source was established to ensure the ongoing maintenance of those improvements. Ultimately, without a direct source of revenue pledged for repair, reconstruction and maintenance of the landscaping within these medians, it was necessary for both the County and City to limit the servicing of what landscaping remained to occasional trimming to control over-growth and the landscaping fell into disrepair. The District was formed in 2011 to address the deteriorating condition and improve the medians.

This report consists of six parts and four appendices, as follows:

PART A – Introduction, purpose, current status and improvement Plans (POINT SAN PEDRO ROAD LANDSCAPING PLANS, consisting of 19 sheets of directional plans describing the planting to be done in the median islands along Third Street and Point San Pedro Road) for the improvements are filed with the City Clerk. Although separately bound, the plans and specifications are a part of this report and are included in it by reference. A reduced version is included with Appendix A, 2022-2023 Annual Engineers Report
PART B - An Amended Estimated Cost of the Assessment District.

Page 4 ends

PART C - Assessment Roll - An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvement on each benefited parcel of land within the assessment district.

PART D - Method of Apportionment of Assessment and Annual Maximum Increases allowed by the District - A statement of the method by which the undersigned has determined the amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel.

PART F - Assessment Diagram - A diagram showing all of the parcels of real property within this assessment district. The diagram is keyed to Part "C" by assessment number.

APPENDIX A 2018-2019 Wildan Engineer’s Report
APPENDIX B Annual Calculations of Allowable Assessment Increase APPENDIX C-1 Assessor’s Parcel Maps of Merged Parcels
APPENDIX C-2 Assessor’s Parcel Maps of Village at Loch Lomond Marina, a re-subdivision of Assessment Numbers 545, 546, 547, 548, 549 and 2626.

APPENDIX D Assessment Diagram
Respectfully submitted,
City of San Rafael
By ______________________________________
Joanna Kwok, City of San Rafael, City Engineer
PART A

Page 5 ends

INTRODUCTION
Due in part to a severe drought in 1976, and the subsequent deterioration of the irrigation system, the landscape improvements within the median islands along Point San Pedro Road and Third Street east of Union Street significantly declined to a point that very little of the original landscaping remained other than some of the trees and vegetation that were able to survive with little water. Although the original landscaping for the twenty-nine (29) median islands along Point San Pedro Road and Third Street (hereafter, referred to collectively as the “Pt. San Pedro Road Medians” or “Medians”) were installed in connection with and for the benefit of the surrounding developments and properties that are directly adjacent to Point San Pedro Road and Third Street and/or serve as the primary access streets to those developments and properties, no local funding source was established to ensure the ongoing maintenance of those improvements. Ultimately, without a direct source of revenue pledged for repair, reconstruction and maintenance of the landscaping within these Medians (located, both within the City limits of the City of San Rafael and in the immediate contiguous unincorporated area of the County of Marin), it was necessary for both the County and City to limit the servicing of what landscaping remained to occasional trimming to control over-growth.

PURPOSE
As a result many property owners in close proximity to Point San Pedro Road both within the City limits of the City of San Rafael and in the immediate contiguous unincorporated area of the County of Marin, organized an effort to facilitate the formation of an assessment district in the area to fund the capital costs associated with construction and restoration of the landscaping within the Pt. San Pedro Road Medians, as well as the ongoing maintenance and operation of those improvements.

Because these Medians and the properties that derive a direct and special benefit from those improvements (properties immediately adjacent to and/or directly access the streets where the medians are located), encompasses an area (territory) that includes properties and improvement areas within both the City of San Rafael and unincorporated portions of the County of Marin, in order to establish such an assessment district the two agencies entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) concerning the formation of an assessment district for the purpose of funding in whole or in part through annual assessments, the capital costs and ongoing maintenance and operation of the landscaping within the Pt. San Pedro Road Medians. Pursuant to the MOU between the City of San Rafael (hereafter, referred to as the “City”) and the County of Marin (hereafter, referred to as the “County”), adopted by both the County Board of Supervisors and by the City Council, the City was designated as the lead agency with the City Council being the legislative body for the proposed assessment district.

Ultimately in 2011, the City Council initiated proceedings and declared their intention to establish a special benefit assessment district pursuant to the provisions of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code commencing with §22500 (hereafter referred to as the “1972 Act”), and as applicable for the issuance of related bonds, pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 Part 1 of Division 10 of the California Streets and Highways Code commencing with §8500 (hereafter referred to as the “1915 Act”), said district to be designated as the:

Pt. San Pedro Road Median Landscaping Assessment District PART A

Page 6 ends

(hereafter referred to as “District”), for the purpose of providing a revenue source to fund the annual debt service obligation for bonds issued to finance the construction, installation, enhancement, renovation and rehabilitation of the landscaping and related facilities; as well as the annual costs and expenses for the ongoing operation, maintenance, and servicing of those improvements including administration and other incidental expenses.

In accordance with the 1972 Act and the requirements of the California Constitution, Article XIIID (hereafter referred to as the “Constitution”), the City Council called for an Engineer’s Report to be prepared regarding the formation of the District and proposed assessments. As part of this District formation, in accordance with the Constitution Article XIIID Section 4 and the provisions of Government Code, Section 53753, the City conducted a property owner protest ballot proceeding for the proposed District special benefit assessments. In conjunction with this ballot proceeding, a noticed public hearing was held on June 20, 2011 to consider public testimonies, comments and written protests regarding the formation of the District and the levy of assessments. Upon conclusion of the public hearing, protest ballots received were opened and tabulated to determine whether majority protest existed (with ballots weighted based on proportional assessment amounts), and on June 22, 2011 the City Council confirmed the results of that ballot tabulation, with approximately 61.4% of the weighted ballots being in favor of the assessments and 38.61% being opposed. Finding that majority protest did not exist, the City Council approved and adopted the formation of the District and ordered the levy and collection of assessments for fiscal year 2011/2012 (first year’s annual assessments).

The assessment rate, method of apportionment and assessments including the assessment range formula established in the Engineer’s Report at the time of formation of the District and as described herein, became effective commencing in Fiscal Year 2011/2012 and may be levied annually pursuant to the provisions of the 1972 Act and as applicable to the provisions of the 1915 Act. The annual assessments each fiscal year shall be based on the estimated revenues needed to support the annual debt service obligation for bonds or other financing issued to fund the construction, installation, enhancement, renovation and rehabilitation of the landscaping and related facilities; as well as the annual costs and expenses for the ongoing operation, maintenance, and servicing of those improvements including administration and other incidental expenses as authorized pursuant to the 1972 Act and the 1915 Act.

This Engineer’s Annual Report (hereafter referred to as “Report”) has been prepared in connection with the annual levy and collection of assessments of said District to be collected on the County Tax Rolls for each fiscal year , pursuant to Chapter 3, beginning with §22,620 of the 1972 Act. The District includes all lots and parcels of land within a defined boundary as shown on the District Diagram included in this Report as Part IV and further identified by the Marin County Assessor’s Office Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (parcels), a listing of which along with the annual assessment amount for each is contained in Appendix C in this Report.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) by the Marin County Assessor’s Office. The Marin County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and a specific Fund Number to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the special benefit assessments described herein.

This Report describes the District and identifies the improvements, including any proposed substantial changes to such improvements to be provided, the estimated expenditures, and the resulting special benefit assessments to be levied and collected on the County tax rolls for the fiscal year. The total District annual assessment presented herein is based on an estimated budget that reflects the revenues PART A

Page 7 ends

required to fund, in whole or in part, the capital costs associated with construction and restoration of the landscaping within the Pt. San Pedro Road Medians, as well as the ongoing maintenance and operation of those improvements. While the proposed total annual assessment for each property will be comprised of two components, one for debt service on Bonds or other financing issued for the initial capital construction costs and the second for the annual operation and maintenance of the improvements, all annual assessment revenues, including those budgeted for operation and maintenance, shall be pledged first to the repayment of the capital improvement costs (debt service on bonds or other financing) with the remaining annual assessment revenues (not applied to debt service and associated administrative expenses) being applied to maintenance and authorized incidental expenses.

Each fiscal year, an Engineer’s Report shall be prepared and presented to the City Council describing the District, any changes to the District or improvements, the proposed budget and assessments for that fiscal year, and the City Council shall hold a noticed public hearing regarding these matters prior to approving and adopting the annual levy of assessments. At the conclusion of the public hearing the City Council may, by resolution, adopt this Report (as submitted or amended) including the assessment diagram; any changes to the improvements to be made, and order the levy and collection of the assessments as described herein. In such case, the assessments (as provided herein or as amended) shall be submitted to the County Auditor/Controller for inclusion on the property tax roll for each fiscal year.

ACTIVITIES FOR PRIOR FISCAL YEARS
Consult the respective year’s Engineer Reports for details.

ACTIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-2025
Maintenance of the Point San Pedro Road medians is ongoing, with routine tree planting planned for late spring to fill in open areas. The Parks Supervisor continues to oversee the landscaping contractor responsible for upkeep, which includes conducting weekly inspections, holding monthly check-in meetings, and providing regular updates to the Point San Pedro Road Coalition.

Gardeners’ Guild holds the ongoing contract for median maintenance and manages the irrigation system. This system requires routine maintenance, and the District should anticipate annual costs to repair or replace broken components. Beginning in Fiscal Year 2024-2025, $10,000 has been added for landscape repairs, which occurs each spring as part of the irrigation system start-up.

At the Assessment District's request, a comprehensive approach is being taken to improve communication, understand current needs, and increase service levels to meet the board's expectations. This includes researching the district's original formation and reviewing historical documents, planting plans, and maintenance lists. The goal is to align future work with the intent and vision established at the time of formation, ensuring that every decision is well-informed and beneficial for the community.

In addition to contractor costs, the District pays for utility expenses related to irrigation, including water service charges billed by the Marin Municipal Water District.

PART A

Page 8 ends

The 2024-25 Engineer’s Report estimated that total anticipated expenditures for FY 2024-25 were $155,286. Based on current projections, we anticipate meeting this amount once staff time is fully calculated.

To maintain the level of service, the Engineer recommends increasing the annual assessment. The District formation documents allow for a yearly increase of up to 3% or the Consumer Price Index (CPI), whichever is greater. As of February 2025, the CPI for the San Francisco area was 2.7%.

Therefore, the maximum allowable 3% increase is recommended to help cover future projects and sustain service levels.

Applying a 3% Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase to the current Operations and Maintenance assessment results in a new assessment of $59.00. The Debt Service portion remains unchanged at $58.70. Therefore, the proposed updated total annual levy for Fiscal Year 2024–2025 is $117.70.

Future Capital Reserve for Point San Pedro Road Median Replacement Projects Staff recommends that the City consider setting aside funds to begin exploring the establishment of a capital reserve specifically for future median projects beyond regular maintenance along Point San Pedro Road. Many of these medians are aging and will eventually require more than routine maintenance to remain safe, functional, and visually appealing. While actual conditions vary, the average lifespan of a landscaped median is approximately 25 to 30 years, depending on factors such as construction materials, irrigation systems, environmental exposure, and maintenance levels. As these medians continue to age, more significant curb, landscaping, and infrastructure repairs will be necessary. To prepare for these anticipated capital needs, staff recommends proactively allocating resources toward a dedicated reserve fund to support long-term planning and implementation of future replacement projects.

GENERAL BENEFITS
For the original formation of the District the Engineer’s Report included a discussion of General Benefits. As noted in the discussion the County and City derive general benefits equivalent to 10% of the overall benefits of the District. However, as also noted, such general benefits did not extend to the landscaping itself, only to the traffic safety provided by the physical presence of the medians and other physical median improvements intended for traffic safety. At the time of formation the median islands had all been constructed and had been in place for many years. The median islands were in reasonable repair considering their age and very little repair, replacement or rehabilitation was necessary.

Since the District is comprised of properties that lie within both the County and the City, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was executed by the County and the City stating their mutual intention to form the District and the obligations of each jurisdiction. The MOU identified each jurisdiction’s share of the General Benefit: County, 37% and the City, 63%. However, the County’s share was specifically capped at $25,000 initially and $6,000 for future annual contributions. The formation Engineer’s report showed the County and the City initially contributing $16,835 and $28,665 respectively.

The original formation Engineer’s Report did not anticipate a large need for median island replacement, repair or rehabilitation. In order to meet their respective obligations for general benefits, a general understanding developed that the County and the City would contribute their administrative PART A

Page 9 ends

staff time or fees to the District as each jurisdiction’s General Benefit contribution. While this was not explicitly stated in the original or subsequent annual Engineer’s Reports it was implied and confirmed by previous City and County staff. This was also made clear in the “Estimated Annual Operation & Maintenance Costs” table in each year’s Engineer’s report: the City Contribution for Annual Administration was equal to Personnel & Staffing, Other Professional Fees, and Miscellaneous Administration Expenses. In the same section, the County Contribution for Annual Administration was equal to the County Collection Fee. Based on these figures, the understanding is that the City has accounted for the staff time necessary to administer the District and the County would waive the normal administrative assessment fees charged to assessment districts, limited by the 37% or $6,000 cap (adjusted for the CPI).

PLANS
The Plans showing the improvements to the medians are included in Appendix A.

PART B

ESTIMATE OF COSTS

Page 10 ends

District Status:

Total Estimated Fund Balance June 30, 2024 (per 2024-25 report) $189,610 Adjustment to match Estimated funds to Actual City Records $44,284 Actual Available Funds on July 1, 2024 $233,894
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ACTIVITY 2024-2025:

Assessment District Revenues:

Assessment District Proceeds $177,869
County Payment $9,537
Interest $5,025
Total District Revenues: $192,430
Assessment District Expenditures through March 31:

Irrigation / Landscaping Repairs $6,467
Landscaping Contract Services $63,681
Utilities $26,800
Estimated Assessment District Expenditures April 1 - June 30:

Irrigation / Landscaping Repairs $10,000
Landscaping Contract Services $21,783
Utilities $8,933
City Staff Time (minus $16,239 contribution by City) $1,800 County Administrative Fees $9,000
Total District Expenditures: $148,464
Total Projected Available Funds on July 1, 2025 $277,860 PROJECTED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ACTIVITY 2025-2026:

Assessment District Revenues:

Assessment District Proceeds $184,530
General Benefit Contribution—County (37%) $9,823
Interest $5,176
Total District Revenue: $199,529
Assessment District Expenditures:

ESTIMATE OF COSTS

Page 11 ends

FY 25-26 Unallocated Funds (Future reserve and maintenance costs) $19,397 Total Projected Available Funds on June 30, 2026: $297,257 End of Part B
PART C

ASSESSMENT ROLL
(Please refer to Part D – Method of Apportionment of Assessment for a Summary of Changes to Part C – Assessment Roll)

Page 12 ends

See attachment titled “Part C – Assessment Roll.”
PART D

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT

Page 13 ends

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements including, the acquisition, construction, installation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping within public right-of-ways such as medians. The 1972 Act requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
The method of apportionment described in this Report for allocation of special benefit assessments utilizes commonly accepted engineering practices and has been established pursuant to the provisions of the 1972 Act and California Constitution. The formulas used for calculating assessments reflect the composition of parcels within the District and the improvements and activities to be provided, and have been designed to fairly apportion costs based on a determination of the proportional special benefits to each parcel.

PROPOSITION 218 BENEFIT ANALYSIS
The estimated annual cost of the improvements have been identified and allocated to properties within the District based on special benefit. The improvements to be provided by this District and for which properties are assessed, have been identified as local amenities that provide a direct reflection and extension of the properties within the District and are considered by many property owners to be an essential component to the overall development and use of properties within the District.

This District was formed to provide and establish a local landscaping enhancement that affects the presentation of the surrounding properties and therefore directly benefit the parcels to be assessed within the District. The assessments and method of apportionment is based on the premise that the assessments will be used to construct and install landscape improvements within the existing Point San Pedro Road Medians as well as provide for the annual maintenance of those improvements, and the assessment revenues generated through the District will be used solely for such purposes.

In conjunction with the provisions of the 1972 Act, the California Constitution Article XIIID addresses several key criteria for the levy of assessments, notably:

Article XIIID Section 2d defines District as follows:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service”; Article XIIID Section 2i defines Special Benefit as follows:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit”.

Article XIIID Section 4a defines proportional special benefit assessments as follows:

PART D

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT

Page 14 ends

San Rafael City CouncilJune 2, 2025

San Rafael City Council
June 2, 2025