I've visited the Merrydale site, and the surrounding area, many times. I am very familiar with the area and the neighborhoods. For that reason -and to maintain fairness and transparency for all parties-I will not be meeting individually or in small groups ahead of the Council vote. It's important that all Councilmembers receive the same information and consider community input through the public process. As you know we will be meeting in person on Monday, Nov. 17th and emails can be sent to [email protected].
I look forward to hearing your ideas and suggestions at the Council meeting and through the formal channels that ensure every voice is heard equally and on the record. I am reading all letters sent to me and they will also be included in the public record.
Thank you again for your understanding and for your continued commitment to our community.
Best,
Rachel
Rachel Kertz (she/her/hers)
To learn more: htt12s://vivalon.org/what-about-aggf_
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/MkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0Ayr32xlqFAEOkqiaQuZ3jvQABm17ESAM 1/2 11/11/25, 2:15 PM
From: Ken Casey >
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2025 5:56 PM
To: Rachel Kertz <[email protected]>
In box - Nguyen Pham - Outlook
Subject: Invitation to Visit 350 Merrydale and Meet with Neighborhood Representatives Before the November 17 Vote Dear Rachel Kertz,
I hope this note finds you well. I'm writing on behalf of our San Rafael Meadows, Redwood Village and Merrydale communities to respectfully invite you to meet in person at the 350 Merrydale property ahead of the City Council's scheduled vote on November 17.
On Saturday we had a neighborhood walkabout on and around the property and many of us feel it's essential that Council members have the opportunity to see the site and vicinity firsthand and hear directly from those who live in the surrounding area. We would like to share some new and specific concerns about the City's plan for the homeless shelter/housing project and especially the impact it will have on nearby neighborhoods and the broader community following recent conversations with the SRPD.
To make this convenient for you, we are arranging small-group meetings with individual Council members on separate days this week. The visit would take no more than 3Q-45 minutes, and we would be happy to accommodate your schedule.
We believe that a brief, on-site conversation will provide valuable context and help ensure that the Council's upcoming decision reflects both the project's intent and the realities faced by those who will be most directly affected.
Please let me know a day and time next week that works best for you - we will gladly adjust to your availability.
Thank you very much for your time, consideration, and service to our community. We sincerely hope you'll join us for this important discussion before the vote.
Warm regards,
Ken Casey
On behalf of the San Rafael Meadows, Merrydale and Redwood Village residents.
Sent from Outlook
https://outlook.office365,com/mail/none/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0Ayr32xlqFAEOkqiaQuZ3jvQABm1 7ESAAA 2/2 11/12/25, 8:21 AM lnbox - Nguyen Pham - Outlook
Outlook
FW: FW: Concerns and Recommendations Regarding Proposed Homeless Transitional Housing Plans From Brenna Nurmi <[email protected]>
Date Wed 11/12/2025 8:13 AM
To Nguyen Pham <[email protected]>
Cc Distrib- City Clerk <[email protected]> Hi N,
Please add this one to your correspondence that you are redacting at this time.
Thanks,
B
From: Betty Shea
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2025 7:30 PM
To: Distrib- City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: FW: FW: Concerns and Recommendations Regarding Proposed Homeless Transitional Housing Plans Importance: High
City Clerk Lyndsay Lara,
This letter was sent to Mayor Kate Colin and want it placed on the public records and attached to the published City Council; Agenda for next week's meeting on Nov. 17.
Thank you,
Betty Shea
Dear Mayor Colin,
I am writing to express serious concerns regarding the County's proposed homeless transitional facility and to urge a more thoughtful and effective approach that meets real homeless needs while respecting and protecting San Rafael neighborhoods. https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0AvYZfAjdaN0mMbVApQjCGlwAAYDBDaQAA 1/3 11/12/25, 8:21 AM lnbox - Nguyen Pham - Outlook
While the community recognizes the urgent need to address homelessness, the current approach is not aligned with long-term success or neighborhood appropriateness. I respectfully ask that the City and County reconsider the location and structure of this proposal based on the following points:
1. Appropriate Location and Successful Outcomes:
Homeless transitional facilities should be sited in locations that minimize negative impacts on existing neighborhoods and maximize the likelihood of successful outcomes for participants. Integrating such facilities into residential neighborhoods without adequate planning or transparency creates unnecessary strain for both residents and program participants.
2. Fiscal Responsibility and Efficient Use of Funds:
The County's proposed budget of $8 million for land purchase and startup costs is excessive and could be more effectively redirected. These funds would have a far greater impact if allocated to a rent voucher program, allowing immediate re-housing for the majority of those in need. Remaining funds could then be used to support essential wraparound services that lead to lasting stability.
3. Focus on Permanent Housing Solutions:
Homeless funding should prioritize hard housing solutions (permanent, stable homes) not temporary "tiny home" villages or public relations initiatives. These short-term measures often fail to provide the sustainable outcomes our community needs.
4. Lack of Transparency and Community Engagement:
Elected officials should have proactively communicated with district residents as this plan was developing, ensuring a transparent process and broad-based input from all stakeholders. Unfortunately, this did not occur, leaving residents feeling blindsided and unheard.
5. Neighborhood Engagement and Willingness to Collaborate:
Local residents are ready and willing to collaborate on realistic solutions that work for both the neighborhood and San Rafael's broader affordable housing goals, particularly if the property is not County-owned and better integrated into the City's long-term housing strategies.
6. Concerns About Sudden Relocation and Impacts:
Relocating unhoused individuals from one area of San Rafael to another without transparency or neighborhood notice is unacceptable. Transitioning people methodically into permanent housing is the responsible path forward. Many, perhaps ½ to ¾ could be successfully re-housed through immediate housing vouchers if funding were reallocated accordingly.
7. Neighborhood Impacts:
As we have seen from previous encampments, there are real and measurable impacts to nearby neighborhoods. Moving an encampment into close proximity to residential areas will likely recreate these same challenges, which should be avoided through better planning.
Our elected representatives, including You, Councilmember Maribeth Bushey (District 3), Supervisor Mary Sackett, and Councilmember Rachel Kertz (District 4), owe residents transparency and accountability in this process. We ask for a pause in current planning efforts and a renewed, collaborative discussion to identify an approach that meets both community and humanitarian needs. https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0AvYZfAjdaN0mMbVApQjCGlwAAYDBDaQAA 2/3 11/12/25, 8:21 AM lnbox - Nguyen Pham - Outlook
Thank you for your attention to these concerns. I look forward to your leadership in ensuring that San Rafael pursues real, effective, and equitable solutions to homelessness that serve all members of our community.
Respectfully,
Betty Shea
Direct:
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0AvYZfAjdaN0mMbVApQjCGlwAAYDBDaQAA 3/3 11/12/25, 2:06 PM lnbox - Nguyen Pham - Outlook
Outlook
Re: 350 Merrydale alternative sites
From John Stefanski <[email protected]> Date Wed 11/12/2025 1:47 PM
To Eoin Sheeran
Cc End Homelessness < [email protected] > Moving the Councilmembers to BCC.
Good afternoon Eoin,
Thank you for reaching out. Our team is still working on the matrix for the various sites we looked at and will have that up on the website later this week.
Regarding the MacPhail's property: As I mentioned to you last week, this property is owned by the School District, not the City. Furthermore, the property itself is located outside of San Rafael's City Limits-the property is in unincorporated Santa Venitia. The City's search for properties only included those which are in our jurisdiction. We did this because by having a project within our own boundaries, the City then has complete control over public safety response as well as authority over regulatory approvals for the future affordable housing project. The County was also only willing to partner with the City for a property within the City itself.
Those points aside, while the MacPhail property may be cheaper on a per acre basis, it would have required extensive site prep work and would lack the usable space for providing on-site services; all of which would have likely made a project there more expensive and thereby more fiscally irresponsible.
Merrydale was ultimately identified as most feasible and cost-effective option because of its quick site preparation, existing utilities, and ability to provide supportive services on-site. It is also well-located for the ultimate affordable housing project as it's close to transit, grocery stores, and community services. The MacPhail property doesn't compare as favorably.
Lastly, I will add that the purchase price for the Merrydale Property is $6.7M. The City had the property appraised which validated this price.
I appreciate you sharing your perspective on this. Please don't hesitate to reach back out if you have any other questions.
Thanks,
John
John Stefanski I City of San Rafael
Assistant City Manager
1400 5th Avenue, Room 203
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/MkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0Ayr32xlqFAEOkqiaQuZ3jvQABnBrHuQM 1/2 11/12/25, 2:06 PM
San Rafael, CA 94901
415.485.3475
John,stefanski@cjtvofsanrafaei,org
Pronouns: He/Him (What are P.ersonal P.ronouns?)
~ !!~~T~!!!o~
From: Eoin Sheeran >
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2025 11:23 AM
To: John Stefanski <[email protected]> lnbox - Nguyen Pham - Outlook
Cc: Mayor Kate <[email protected]>; End Homelessness <[email protected]>; Maribeth Bushey <[email protected]>; Rachel Kertz <[email protected]> Subject: 350 Merrydale alternative sites
John,
I spoke with you on Thursday at the JCC. I asked you if you or the city could provide the criteria for evaluating each of the 20 sites that were looked at while searching for a suitable location for this project. You told me that information was online, but I can't find it. I can only find the list of sites. Do you have the results for each location showing why they were ruled out? I would imagine each site was thoroughly analyzed and would have a file with all of that information in it? I also asked you about another alternative site that was not on your list: McPhail Elementary School property at 1565 Vendola Drive. Was this site looked at? It is a 9.75 acre site that is for sale for $6 million. The 350 Merrydale property is only 2.3 acres and you plan to purchase it for $7.3 million. How do those numbers make sense? It is fiscally irresponsible to spend that much money on a site, when you currently own a site that is four times bigger and has comparable amenities.
I would appreciate an answer my questions, and not just a referral to the FAQ webpage as you did on Thursday.
Thanks,
Eoin Sheeran
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0Ayr32xlqFAEOkqiaQuZ3jvQABnBrHuQAA 2/2 11/12/25, 2:06 PM lnbox - Nguyen Pham - Outlook
Outlook
Re: 350 Merrydale
From John Stefanski <[email protected]> Date Wed 11/12/2025 1:58 PM
To
Cc End Homelessness < [email protected] > Good afternoon Bernie,
Thanks for reaching out and I appreciate your suggestion. I have my team working on that and we're aiming to have it up on the website by the end of the week. Our team will follow up with you once it's there.
Best,
John
John Stefanski I City of San Rafael
Assistant City Manager
1400 5th Avenue, Room 203
San Rafael, CA 94901
415.485.3475
[email protected]
Pronouns: He/Him (What are Rersonal Rronouns?)
~ ~~~:T~!!;o~
From:
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2025 11:28 AM
To: John Stefanski <[email protected]> Subject: 350 Merrydale
Hi John:
Another gripe letter from a Rafael Meadows resident
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0Ayr32xlqFAEOkqiaQuZ3jvQABnBrHuwAA 1/2 11/12/25, 2:06 PM lnbox - Nguyen Pham - Outlook
I attended the Oct 28th meeting as well as the recent JCC meeting and plan to be at the Nov. 17th meeting as well.
While I sympathize with the need to provide long term solutions for our homeless residents, I decry the secretive nature and lack of adequate notice for local residents to participate in the process. But, I'm guessing you've heard this ad nauseam.
I've been looking at the 21 "alternative" sites listed by the City, it would be helpful if the criteria for rejecting each site were listed.
Empty lots close to social services are rejected, but no reason given (eg, utility availability, building costs).
I'd point out, that with a slow down of this project the Meadows would likely mobilize a bunch of us to look for alternative sites. Might prove helpful or lead to resignation about the lack of appropriate alternatives_ Bernie Samet
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0Ayr32xlqFAEOkqiaQuZ3jvQABnBrHuwAA 2/2 11/12/25, 2:06 PM
Outlook
Fw: 350 Merrydale In-Person Meeting Request
From Lindsay Lara <[email protected]>
Date Wed 11/12/2025 2:05 PM
To End Homelessness <[email protected]> From: Eli Hill <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2025 1:48 PM
To:
Cc: Distrib- City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Re: 350 Merrydale In-Person Meeting Request
Dear Mr. Dickinson,
lnbox - Nguyen Pham - Outlook
Thank you for reaching out and for your continued engagement regarding the 350 Merrydale Project. I appreciate the time and thought your neighborhood committee has dedicated to understanding the proposal and sharing your perspectives.
While I'm unable to meet in person this week due to scheduling constraints, I welcome your input and value the concerns raised by the Rafael Meadows, Merrydale, and Redwood Village communities. To ensure your message is part of the public record, I've included the City Clerk on this email.
Please feel free to share any additional thoughts, questions, or materials by email.
Much appreciated,
Eli
Eli Hill
Councilmember District 2, City of San Rafael
Pronouns: he, him, his
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/MkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0Ayr32xlqFAEOkqiaQuZ3jvQABnBrJrAM 1/2 11/12/25, 2:06 PM
ii~~ dfh SAN RAFAEL
l 'f/J!lRn THE CITY WITH A MISSION
UV established 1874
From:
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2025 5:59 PM
To: Eli Hill <[email protected]>
Subject: 350 Merrydale In-Person Meeting Request
Dear Council member Hill:
lnbox - Nguyen Pham - Outlook
I called earlier today regarding the 350 Merrydale Project. Since the October 28 Virtual Event and the November 6 JCC Listening Session, our neighborhood has learned more about the proposal. We would like to invite you to engage with us in person to better understand our concerns.
Have you had a chance to visit the 350 Merrydale site ahead of the Public Hearing on Monday, November 17? During our walkthrough this past Saturday, we focused on nearby "grey areas" where homeless encampments have been reportedparticularly the Caltrans-owned land between Highway 101 and the property. We also spoke with the San Rafael Police Department, who provided helpful insight into what the community might expect if the City Council approves the purchase.
A small group from our neighborhood committee would greatly appreciate meeting with you at the site this week to share our perspectives in person. Could you please let us know a date and time that would work for you? Sincerely,
Ken Dickinson
Rafael Meadows, Merrydale and Redwood Village Neighborhoods. https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0Ayr32xlqFAEOkqiaQuZ3jvQABnBrJrAAA 2/2 11/12/25, 2:07 PM lnbox - Nguyen Pham - Outlook
Outlook
Fw: 350 Merrydale Visit: Meet with Neighborhood Representatives Before the November 17th Vote From Lindsay Lara <[email protected]>
Date Wed 11/12/2025 2:05 PM
To End Homelessness <[email protected]> From: Eli Hill <[email protected]>
To:
Cc: Distrib- City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Re: 350 Merrydale Visit: Meet with Neighborhood Representatives Before the November 17th Vote Dear Carter,
Thank you for reaching out and for your continued engagement regarding the 350 Merrydale Project. I appreciate the time and thought your neighborhood committee has dedicated to understanding the proposal and sharing your perspectives.
While I'm unable to meet in person due to scheduling constraints, I welcome your input and value the concerns raised by the Rafael Meadows, Merrydale, and Redwood Village communities. To ensure your message is part of the public record, I've included the City Clerk on this email.
Please feel free to share any additional thoughts, questions, or materials by email.
Much appreciated,
Eli
Eli Hill
Council member District 2, City of San Rafael
Pronouns: he, him, his
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/MkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0Ayr32xlqFAEOkqiaQuZ3jvQABnBrJrwM 1/3 11/12/25, 2:07 PM
ii~~ dfh SAN RAFAEL
l 'f/J!lRn THE CITY WITH A MISSION
UV established 1874
From:
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2025 1:08 PM
To: Eli Hill <[email protected]>
lnbox - Nguyen Pham - Outlook
Subject: 350 Merrydale Visit: Meet with Neighborhood Representatives Before the November 17th Vote Dear Councilmember Hill,
I hope this note finds you well. Following up on my voicemail. I'm writing on behalf of our San Rafael Meadows, Redwood Village and Merrydale communities to respectfully invite you to meet in person at the 350 Merrydale property ahead of the City Council's scheduled vote on November 17th.
On Saturday we had a neighborhood walkabout on and around the property and many of us feel it's essential that Council members have the opportunity to see the site and vicinity firsthand and hear directly from those who live in the surrounding area. We would like to share some new and specific concerns about the City's plan for the homeless shelter/housing project and especially the impact it will have on nearby neighborhoods and the broader community following recent conversations with the SRPD.
To make this convenient for you, we are arranging small group meetings with individual Council members on separate days next week. The visit would take no more than 30-45 minutes, and we would be happy to accommodate your schedule.
We believe that a brief, on site conversation will provide valuable context and help ensure that the Council's upcoming decision reflects both the project's intent and the realities faced by those who will be most directly affected.
Please let me know a day and time next week that works best for you - we will gladly adjust to your availability.
Thank you very much for your time, consideration, and service to our community.
We sincerely hope you'll join us for this important discussion before the vote.
Warm regards,
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0Ayr32xlqFAEOkqiaQuZ3jvQABnBrJrwAA 2/3 11/12/25, 2:07 PM lnbox - Nguyen Pham - Outlook
Carter Phelps On behalf of the San Rafael Meadows, Merrydale and Redwood Village residents Carter Phelos
https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/MkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0Ayr32xlqFAEOkqiaQuZ3jvQABnBrJrwM 3/3 11/12/25, 2:22 PM
Outlook
FW: Follow up on Tuesday's commitments
From Brenna Nurmi <[email protected] >
Date Wed 11/12/2025 2:16 PM
To Nguyen Pham <[email protected]>
Cc Distrib- City Clerk <[email protected]> Please add this to your correspondence, N.
From: Maryellen Mullin Fong >
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2025 1:43 PM
To: Distrib- City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Fwd: Follow up on Tuesday's commitments
FW: Follow up on Tuesday's commitments - Nguyen Pham - Outlook I would like all my correspondence with the Mayor below submitted for public records.
Respectfu I ly,
Maryellen
about:blank 1/10
11/12/25, 2:22 PM
Maryellen Mullin FonQ
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Mayor Kate <~yofsanrafael org,>
Date: Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: Follow up on Tuesday's commitments
To: Maryellen Mullin Fonq >
FW: Follow up on Tuesday's commitments - Nguyen Pham - Outlook CC: Betty Shea aribeth Bushey <[email protected]>, Marv Sackett <Marv~S~ackeJt e essness <endhomelessness@cltvJ>fsanraf e .o _ >, judith
Hi Ms. Mullin Fong - Thank you for following up. I'm sorry my earlier message came across in a way that felt disrespectful as of course that wasn't my intention. My reference to your professional background was meant only to acknowledge the valuable perspective you bring as a member of the community.
I understand that safety and transparency are central concerns, and I appreciate you continuing to share your perspective. Your feedback helps inform how we communicate with residents as this process moves forward.
Kate Colin (she/her/hers)
Mayor, City of San Rafael
about:blank 2/10
11/12/25, 2:22 PM FW: Follow up on Tuesday's commitments - Nguyen Pham - Outlook RAFAEL
THE CITY WITH A MISSION
established 1874
Subject: Re: Follow up on Tuesday's commitments
Dear Mayor Colin,
Thank you for your response. However, the information I requested still does NOT appear in the City's FAQs - specifically regarding safety, sex offenders, or crime statistics. These are central issues for our community, and continuing to defer to the FAQ without addressing these questions directly is unacceptable.
about:blank 3/10
11/12/25, 2:22 PM FW: Follow up on Tuesday's commitments - Nguyen Pham - Outlook Additionally, your reference to my professional background is inappropriate. If you are suggesting that my expertise as a licensed clinical psychotherapist could be of service to the City, you may formally contract and compensate me for that work. I have over twenty years of professional experience, and it is deeply disrespectful - and frankly insulting - to imply that I should volunteer that expertise while my own family's safety is being jeopardized by your administration's decisions.
I again ask that you provide direct, transparent answers to the specific safety and crime-related concerns raised by myself and others in the community.
Respectfully,
Maryellen Mullin Fong, LMFT
Maryellen Mullin FonQ
On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 11 :03 AM Mayor Kate <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Maryellen and all cc'd on this email - Thank you for your continued engagement. I understand your concerns and agree that safety and transparency are essential as we move forward. The questions you and others have raised are being addressed through the City's FAQ so about:blank 4/10
11/12/25, 2:22 PM FW: Follow up on Tuesday's commitments - Nguyen Pham - Outlook that everyone has access to the same, accurate information. This approach ensures consistency and improves transparency by sharing updates publicly rather than responding to individual emails.
I see from your signature line that you're a family therapist, and your perspective will be valuable in the upcoming discussions around the Good Neighbor Policy and Code of Conduct, which are focused on ensuring safety, accountability, and mutual respect. So thank you again for your advocacy and commitment to our community.
Kate Colin (she/her/hers)
Mayor, City of San Rafael
SAN RAFAEL
THE CITY WITH A MISSION
established 1874
From: Maryellen Mullin Fong
Sent: Saturday, November 1, 2025 9:33 AM
To: Mayor Kate • • ==== >
Cc: Betty Shea Maribeth • • • • ,gW£,>; End
Homelessness <endhomelessness@_myofsanrafael.om>;
about:blank 5/10
11/12/25, 2:22 PM FW: Follow up on Tuesday's commitments - Nguyen Pham - Outlook >; judith alien
Subject: Re: Follow up on Tuesday's commitments
Dear Mayor Kate,
My questions are not being addressed anywhere in your emails, or on your FAQs:
1) When will the Code of Conduct be on the FAQ?
2) When will the 20 sites be listed, as promised on the zoom meeting by Daniel Cooperman on the FAQ? 3) When will crime stats of the current encampment be released? We are all reading the police reports that do get released, and most crime takes place near the current encampment on Andersen. We want to know how many registered and unregistered sex offenders you plan to move into our neighborhood, near our daycares and around our children. The fact that you are not answering, makes us assume, you are hiding these facts.
You are not working with us, and until you answer our questions, I do NOT believe you take my safety, the safety our our most vulnerable , our children, and our elderly in this community, seriously.
Respectfully,
Maryellen Mullin Fong
about:blank 6/10
11/12/25, 2:22 PM FW: Follow up on Tuesday's commitments - Nguyen Pham - Outlook On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 2:36 PM Mayor Kate <[email protected].> wrote:
about:blank
Hi Maryellen and Betty - Thank you both for continuing to stay engaged and for sharing your thoughts. I know how closely you've been following this process, and I appreciate the time and care you've taken to raise questions and share feedback.
Staff are continuing to update the FAQ page as new information becomes available, and your input helps ensure that the community's concerns are reflected in those updates.
Warm regards,
Kate
Kate Colin (she/her/hers)
Mayor, City of San Rafael
7110
11/12/25, 2:22 PM FW: Follow up on Tuesday's commitments - Nguyen Pham - Outlook about:blank
From: Betty Shea
Sent: Thursday,
To: Maryellen Mullin F
-:a;j@,,
' SAN RAFAEL
THE CITY WITH A MISSION
established 1874
Cc: Maribeth Bushey <maribeth,[email protected] • • • • • fsanrafaeLonz>; End Subject: Re: Follow up on Tuesday's commitments
Well said!! I hope they get it!
Betty
On Oct 30, 2025, at 9:31 PM, Maryellen Mullin Fong< rote:
8/10
11/12/25, 2:22 PM
about:blank
FW. Follow up on Tuesday's commitments - Nguyen Pham - Outlook Dear Mayor Colin, Ms. Bushey, Mr. Cooperman, and Ms. Sackett, During Tuesday's recorded and highly controlled Zoom meeting, each of you assured the community that the list of the 20 proposed sites would be disclosed and made public by today, Thursday. As of now, these sites are still not listed in the FAQs for 350 Merrydale.
In addition, we requested that the Code of Conduct be shared and defined, as it remains unclear what this refers to-yet it was repeatedly mentioned throughout the Zoom call. This is public information, and withholding it only deepens community concerns about transparency.
We also continue to request the crime statistics from the current encampments. Many neighbors and mothers have asked for this data, yet it was again deferred by the Lieutenant during the meeting.
Frankly, our community is growing weary of elected officials holding closed-door discussions and limiting public access to essential information. These decisions affect all of us, and we expect open communication, not secrecy.
Until transparency and accountability are restored, you no longer have my vote or trust.
Respectfully,
Maryellen Mullin Fong
-
9/10
11/12/25, 2:22 PM FW: Follow up on Tuesday's commitments - Nguyen Pham - Outlook Maryellen Mullin Fon~
about:blank 10/10
Comments from November 6, 2025, Open House Event/ Special City Council Meeting 11/12/25, 3:13 PM lnbox - Nguyen Pham - Outlook
Outlook
FW: 350 Merrydale - Tiny Homes Project I New submission from Contact the City Clerk's Office From Brenna Nurmi <[email protected]>
Date Wed 11/12/2025 3:10 PM
To Nguyen Pham <[email protected]>
Cc Distrib- City Clerk <[email protected]> Here is another, N.
8 From:
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2025 2:35 PM
To: Distrib- City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: 350 Merrydale - Tiny Homes Project I New submission from Contact the City Clerk's Office Name
Bernard Samet
Email
Subject
350 Merrydale - Tiny Homes Project
Message
Lara please add this to the public comments for the Nov. 17th meeting.
As of Nov 12th, there are no reasons posted on SR's website as to why the 21 alternative sites were rejected by theCity.
Without knowing the reasons, we are being kept in the dark and cannot make our own assessments. Is it possible these sites were selected AFTER the project was given the green light? 5 of the 21 sites are already being renovated/under construction. FYI, sites 6 and 19 are actually the same site (Yacht Way and Terrapin) https://outlook.office365.com/mail/inbox/id/AAkALgAAAAAAHYQDEapmEc2byACqAC%2FEWg0AvYZfAjdaN0mMbVApQjCGlwAAYDBTGQAA 1/1 From: Betty Shea
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2025 8:26 PM
To: Mayor Kate <[email protected]>; Maika Llorens Gulati <[email protected]>; Eli Hill <[email protected]>; Maribeth Bushey <[email protected]>; Rachel Kertz <[email protected]>; Distrib- City Clerk <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; Richard Halstead, Marin IJ <[email protected]>; Cameron Macdonald <[email protected]>; Steven Rosenfeld, Marin IJ <[email protected]> Subject: 350 Merrydale – For Immediate Posting and Inclusion on the City Council Agenda Dear City Council,
It is appalling that you have advanced as far as you have with the bait and switch on 350 Merrydale without a robust public process. You have all defied the trust of your constituents; if you move forward, it will be in direct contravention of the will of the people.
To date, there is no Environmental Impact analysis or report for this site, as required by the State-certified Housing Element or specific to any consideration for a homeless compound. This is simply egregious, and we demand that you immediately rescind any backroom deals you have consented to or entertained. We do not want our tax dollars – city and county tax dollars – wasted on this pipedream.
Use funds to actually address a successful and thoughtful solution. The homeless are not your political pawns. But neither are we!
Sincerely,
Betty Shea
San Rafael
30 plus years resident
From:
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 10:41 AM
To: Eli Hill <[email protected]>
Cc: Distrib- City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: Re: 350 Merrydale Visit: Meet with Neighborhood Representatives Before the November 17th Vote
Hi Councilmember Hill,
Thanks for your reply. I want to be candid: do you truly feel a vote on this project can move forward without directly engaging the local businesses and community at the 350 Merrydale site? At a minimum, that outreach should occur before any decision is made. Or has this decision already been effectively made for you and the other councilmembers? This item should be removed from the agenda and postponed until public commentary and community engagement can be properly gathered. Our neighborhoods deserve adequate time and full transparency around this process. So far, the planning has taken place behind closed doors, without collaboration, and we’ve been left in the dark on key details.
That is simply not acceptable.
There has also been conflicting information throughout. The City and County appear to be significantly overpaying for this property, which raises questions about the need for any closed-door discussions related to negotiation. And if this ever moves to a developer-led phase, estimates suggest it could cost $80+ million to build out. How is that a responsible use of taxpayer dollars in exchange for an $8 million grant with heavy conditions attached? This is a collective decision for the entire Council, and there is no reason for it to be pushed through with such urgency. What is driving this aggressive timeline? Many of the alternative sites presented aren’t truly viable or appear duplicative, which only adds to the concern.
This issue isn’t going away—for you or for any councilmember. The community deserves respect, time, genuine engagement, collaboration, and full transparency around both the process and the decisions being made. Please take the time to rebuild trust before any vote moves forward.
Myself and others are available to meet anytime before the Monday vote, I’m sure you can find 30 minutes. It’s a short 10 minute drive for you. Let’s make it happen at a bare minimum.
Regards,
Carter
Carter Phelps
On Nov 12, 2025, at 4:50 PM, Eli Hill <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear Carter,
Thank you for reaching out and for your continued engagement regarding the 350 Merrydale Project. I appreciate the time and thought your neighborhood committee has dedicated to understanding the proposal and sharing your perspectives.
While I’m unable to meet in person due to scheduling constraints, I welcome your input and value the concerns raised by the Rafael Meadows, Merrydale, and Redwood Village communities. To ensure your message is part of the public record, I’ve included the City Clerk on this email.
Please feel free to share any additional thoughts, questions, or materials by email.
Much appreciated,
Eli
Eli Hill
Councilmember District 2, City of San Rafael
Pronouns: he, him, his
<Outlook-x5cgbmki.png>
From:
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2025 1:08 PM
To: Eli Hill <[email protected]>
Subject: 350 Merrydale Visit: Meet with Neighborhood Representatives Before the November 17th Vote
Dear Councilmember Hill,
I hope this note finds you well. Following up on my voicemail. I’m writing on behalf of our San Rafael Meadows, Redwood Village and Merrydale communities to respectfully invite you to meet in person at the 350 Merrydale property ahead of the City Council’s scheduled vote on November 17th.
On Saturday we had a neighborhood walkabout on and around the property and many of us feel it’s essential that Council members have the opportunity to see the site and vicinity firsthand and hear directly from those who live in the surrounding area. We would like to share some new and specific concerns about the City’s plan for the homeless shelter/housing project and especially the impact it will have on nearby neighborhoods and the broader community following recent conversations with the SRPD.
To make this convenient for you, we are arranging small-group meetings with individual Council members on separate days next week. The visit would take no more than 30–45 minutes, and we would be happy to accommodate your schedule.
We believe that a brief, on-site conversation will provide valuable context and help ensure that the Council’s upcoming decision reflects both the project’s intent and the realities faced by those who will be most directly affected.
Please let me know a day and time next week that works best for you — we will gladly adjust to your availability.
Thank you very much for your time, consideration, and service to our community.
We sincerely hope you’ll join us for this important discussion before the vote.
Warm regards,
Carter Phelps
On behalf of the San Rafael Meadows, Merrydale and Redwood Village residents Carter Phelps
From: Ed Shea
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2025 8:16 PM
To: Mayor Kate <[email protected]>; Maika Llorens Gulati <[email protected]>; Eli Hill <[email protected]>; Maribeth Bushey <[email protected]>; Rachel Kertz <[email protected]>; Distrib- City Clerk <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; Cameron Macdonald <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: 350 Merrydale – For Immediate Posting and Inclusion on the City Council Agenda [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
RE: 350 Merrydale – For Immediate Posting and Inclusion on the City Council Agenda Dear City Council,
I am writing to you on behalf of the adjacent communities to your proposed homeless site, as referenced above.
First and foremost, I demand that this item be continued from any City Council action, since you have failed as the City Council elected to represent us, the taxpayers. This is a clear dereliction of your duties; you have ZERO support for this project and you have been unfaithful to your office and your oath by operating in secret and without input. Specifically, this site is a published housing opportunity site that has been confirmed and certified by the State. I demand you reveal when this site was reconsidered for a homeless shelter and when.
You have demonstrated that you have ZERO regard for solving homelessness. 350 Merrydale is likely the worst possible site to consider to address the real needs of the homeless population and it is not a viable or resilient solution in large part to your very own published constraints of the site. This is remarkably incompetent and callous.
Do you really want to create another Ritter Center and 4th Street debacle? Have you failed to learn from your previous disasters?
You have eroded the public’s trust. Remove this item from any further consideration and cease from any further attempts to bamboozle your constituents.
Sincerely,
Edward J. Shea Jr.
San Rafael, CA 94903
30+ year resident of San Rafael Meadows
cc: Marin IJ Editorial Board
Richard Halstead, Marin IJ ([email protected])
Cameron Macdonald, Marin IJ ([email protected])
Steven Rosenfeld, Marin IJ ([email protected])
From:
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 12:20 PM
To: Lindsay Lara <[email protected]>
Subject: 350 Merrydale - November 17 Agenda Item Public Comments
PLEASE POST IN THE PUBLIC RECORD
Dear Lindsay:
Could you please include the following Marin IJ Letters to The Editor published over the last month regarding the 350 Merrydale Project. I believe it will be helpful for the City Council Members and the Mayor to read them before they make their decision and take their vote on the property at the November 17 Public Hearing.
Sincerely
Ken Dickinson
The Brown Act
Source: California Gov. Code Section 54950
This chapter shall be known as the Ralph M. Brown Act.
“The people of this State do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created.”
Marin IJ Readers’ Forum for Oct. 29, 2025
By Letters to the editor
PUBLISHED: October 28, 2025 at 12:58 PM PDT
San Rafael community caught off guard by tiny homes plan Along with many other residents of the San Rafael Meadows and Merrydale neighborhoods, I was stunned to learn, through a press conference on Oct. 15, that our city had selected 350 Merrydale Road for a 65-unit “tiny home” shelter village. Until that day, I knew of no one from the surrounding communities who had been informed, consulted or even notified that this property was under consideration.
I want to be clear, I am not opposing solutions for homelessness or affordable housing. I’ve lived in the San Rafael Meadows neighborhood for 27 years and I’ve always tried to stay involved in local politics. I served on the flood zone advisory board and advocated for the “Quiet Zone” along the Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit line.
I know that our community values compassion, inclusion and smart planning. What I’m opposed to is the lack of transparency and the absence of public dialogue in how this project is being handled.
According to the IJ article (“San Rafael, Marin County to provide small dwellings for homeless,” Oct. 17), the City Council will not consider the purchase agreement until Nov. 17, yet city and county officials (along with what appears to be the full force and presence of state officials) publicly announced the project on Oct. 15. I think they acted as if it were a done deal, a “fait accompli.” The article also notes a “tentative agreement” was reached in closed session on Oct. 2, but no public report was ever made.
Residents are now being invited to “provide feedback” only after the public rollout and long after key decisions appear to have been made behind closed doors. That’s not inclusion, it’s damage control.
As a part of the community, I am asking city officials to pause, disclose the timeline and approvals behind this project, and begin a genuine conversation with the people who live here. San Rafael deserves public processes that are open, honest and worthy of our trust.
— Ken Dickinson, San Rafael
Marin IJ Readers’ Forum for Oct. 31, 2025
By Letters to the editor
PUBLISHED: October 30, 2025 at 12:58 PM PDT
San Rafael plan is a risky disruption for neighborhood
As long-time residents of San Rafael Meadows, we are writing to express our strong opposition to the proposed tiny-home project for the homeless, just 0.2 miles, or a sixminute walk, from our front door (“San Rafael, Marin County to provide small dwellings for homeless,” Oct. 16).
My husband and I moved here over 30 years ago and raised our two sons in this safe, quiet, family-oriented neighborhood. We were shocked to learn city officials are considering placing a homeless housing site so close to an established residential area and longtime local businesses.
Equally troubling is the lack of transparency in the decision-making process. There was no proactive outreach or communication with nearby residents before this plan advanced. It feels as though the voices of those most affected have been ignored.
We also have serious concerns about public safety, sanitation and maintenance.
Without clear plans for on-site management, security and ongoing upkeep, the risk of increased crime, litter and unsanitary conditions is real.
These are not hypothetical concerns — they could quickly diminish the quality of life we’ve worked hard to build and preserve.
We understand the need to address homelessness with compassion and effective solutions. But placing this project within steps of a stable neighborhood is not the right approach. Other sites are better suited for this type of housing, locations that wouldn’t place such a disproportionate burden on families and long-standing residents.
We urge Mayor Kate Colin and other city representatives to reconsider this location, engage openly with the community and explore alternatives that meet the needs of the unhoused while protecting the character and safety of neighborhoods like San Rafael Meadows.
—Betty Shea and Ed Shea, San Rafael
Marin IJ Readers’ Forum for Nov. 1, 2025
By Letters to the editor
PUBLISHED: October 31, 2025 at 12:58 PM PDT
San Rafael officials picked wrong place for tiny homes
I was disappointed to read about apparent closed meetings and secret negotiations in regard to the decision by San Rafael officials to build tiny homes for the unhoused at 350 Merrydale Road (“San Rafael, Marin County to provide small dwellings for homeless,” Oct. 16).
It feels like Mayor Kate Colin and the San Rafael City Council are trying to sneak this through. That would be shameful.
Terra Linda is the wrong place to build what I consider to be just another encampment with many of the same issues.
— Craig A. Nelson, San Rafael
Marin IJ Readers’ Forum for Nov. 2, 2025
By Letters to the editor
PUBLISHED: November 1, 2025 at 12:56 PM PDT
Neighbors need time to discuss plan with city
I am writing in response to the article published Oct. 16 with the headline “San Rafael, Marin County to provide small dwellings for homeless.” The plan appears to call for lockable cabins to provide shelter for those interested residents currently residing in the sanctioned Mahon Creek encampment. The tiny homes are planned for 350 Merrydale Road.
On the surface, any program for the homeless that provides housing, even temporarily, is a step above the usual and should be applauded. However, this project is not without issues and detractors. The local neighborhood where this project is slated is represented by the Rafael Meadows homeowner’s association, of which I am a member. Most of us were blindsided by the news of this project. By Oct. 20, our HOA had mobilized, holding a well-attended meeting at the local pizzeria.
By the next evening at the scheduled San Rafael City Council meeting, about 12 of my neighbors got up to comment on the issue. They were all vehemently against the project. Problems cited included the site being close to where children play and close to daycare centers. There are concerns about sanitation, as well as worries about issues related to drug usage and mental illness.
I think this blindsiding was deliberate. It seems to be an attempt to ram the project through before local residents have a chance to organize and explain their opposition.
I feel the time frame for this project needs to be delayed so that both sides can more fully explore and explain their positions to each other. Who knows? Maybe we can come up with a plan both sides can agree on.
— Bernie Samet, San Rafael
Marin IJ Readers’ Forum for Nov. 5, 2025
By Letters to the editor
PUBLISHED: November 4, 2025 at 12:58 PM PST
San Rafael should open a hotel to homeless right now
I am writing in response to the article published Oct. 16 with the headline “San Rafael, Marin County to provide small dwellings for homeless.” I think city officials should look into the feasibility of contracting with a local hotel in the Northgate area to house homeless people. City officials should then proceed to find a nonprofit builder for the permanent buildings on the 350 Merrydale Road property.
The money earmarked for the purchase of the 64 temporary tiny homes and the estimated $2 million annual maintenance thereof could be better used for sheltering people in rooms that have private bathrooms, coffee makers and mini fridges for food storage. Additionally, something located within walking or biking distance of the Northgate mall could provide services and a variety of work possibilities. — Roxanna Atkins, San Rafael
Marin IJ Readers’ Forum for Nov. 9, 2025
By Letters to the editor
PUBLISHED: November 8, 2025 at 12:56 PM PST
San Rafael’s process feels authoritarian, dismissive
I’m deeply frustrated with how San Rafael officials — especially the mayor and council members — have handled the new proposed “tiny homes” project in my Terra Linda neighborhood (“San Rafael, Marin County to provide small dwellings for homeless,” Oct. 16).
Residents here were completely blindsided. It appears that this decision was made behind closed doors before the people most affected were ever informed or invited to be part of the process. I think the way it was announced through a media event felt more like an executive order than local government. I consider it authoritarian and dismissive of residents’ voices.
All I’m asking for is transparency, honesty and genuine community involvement. Marin residents have already made it clear they oppose this kind of top-down leadership — just look at the “No Kings” rally and the calls for accountable government. In this case, it feels like San Rafael officials need a reminder.
— Frank Mason, San Rafael
Marin IJ Readers’ Forum for Nov. 11, 2025
By Letters to the editor
PUBLISHED: November 10, 2025 at 12:57 PM PST
Transparency should be essential part of strategy
The recent article about Marin County’s homelessness funding crisis (“Marin officials reassess homelessness strategy in face of obstacles,” Nov. 2) reminds us that success in reducing homelessness is fragile without clear, inclusive planning and transparent decision-making.
Here in my San Rafael neighborhood, the ambitious plan at 350 Merrydale Road seems to tick many of the boxes — interim cabins, support services and long-term housing — yet the rollout has left many neighbors with the sense of being an afterthought. When major decisions about land acquisition and site operations ($7.3 million, plus about $2 million annually) are made and announced with only a month or less of visible public input, it raises the question: Is this being done for the community or to the community? Homelessness is too serious to be treated as a political hot potato — but when decisions are made under time pressure, with closed negotiations and limited early community involvement, that’s exactly how it looks.
If San Rafael and Marin County officials truly want to build public trust, they should pause, share all the financial and operational details, invite wide input and measure results publicly — not just after the fact. Transparency isn’t optional: it’s essential for effective, sustainable and widely supported solutions.
— Janet Shirley, San Rafael
PLEASE POST IN THE PUBLIC RECORD
From: Wayne Rayburn
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 11:47 AM
To: Mayor Kate <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; Maribeth Bushey <[email protected]>; Rachel Kertz <[email protected]>; Distrib- City Clerk <[email protected]> Subject: 350 Merrydale Road
RE: 350 Merrydale Road - For Immediate Posting and Inclusion on the City Council Agenda Please Post in Public Comments
Dear City Council Members,
San Rafael Meadows, Merrydale residents and business owners were blindsided by a City and County plan to build an interim homeless shelter at 350 Merrydale Road.
There was no community input, no safety plan and no clear assessment of the impact on our neighborhood.
I fully support compassionate, effective solutions to homelessness, but this proposal was crafted without transparency or community involvement. The community deserves a voice, openness with a safer and smarter solution which helps those in need without harming local families and businesses.
This project has moved forward with minimal outreach to the people who live and work here every day. Decisions with lasting impact on our neighborhoods must involve open dialogue not unilateral action.
The proposed site raises serious concerns about safety, security and local business stability. Information from other areas, similar projects without proper planning have led to increased disturbances and crime. Resulting in hurting small businesses and community trust.
I urge city officials to reconsider the location at this time. I encourage them to engage in genuine public discussions around exploring alternative sites and partnerships that address homelessness responsibility effectively.
Thank You for your consideration on this matter.
Regards,
Wayne M. Rayburn
Please post in public comments