Agenda packet, second session — San Ramon City Council, February 8, 2022

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
February 8, 2022

WE PROVIDE EFFICIENT DELIVERY OF QUALITY PUBLIC SERVICES THAT ARE

ESSENTIAL TO THOSE WHO LIVE AND WORK IN SAN RAMON
David E. Hudson, Mayor • Sridhar Verose, Vice Mayor
Mark Armstrong, Councilmember • Scott Perkins, Councilmember • Sabina Zafar, Councilmember Agenda Questions: Please call the City Clerk (925) 973-2539 Documents received after publication of this Agenda and considered by the City Council in its deliberation will be available for inspection only via electronic document transfer, due to COVID-19. See the COVID-19 provisions outlined below. Please call or email the City Clerk during normal business hours if you require access to any such documents.

TELECONFERENCE REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 PM
COVID-19 ADVISORY AND MEETING PROCEDURE
Assembly Bill 361 suspends certain provisions of the Brown Act, allowing public meetings to be held by teleconference. As a precaution to protect the health and safety of staff, officials, and the general public. Councilmembers will not be physically in attendance, but will be available via video conference.

There will be no physical location for members of the public to participate in the meeting. We encourage members of the public to access the meeting online using Zoom. It is recommended that anyone wishing to view and/or participate in the meeting, download the Zoom application, www.zoom.us, before the start of the meeting. Zoom participants will have the opportunity to speak during one of the Public Comment periods (for topics not on the agenda), in addition to each of the agendized items.

If you would like to submit written public comment via email, please do so by 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 8, 2022, to [email protected]. Please include “Public Comment 2/8/2022” in the subject line. In the body of the email please include your name and the item you wish to comment on. Written comments submitted will be provided to the Council prior to the start of the meeting. Written public comment will not be read aloud during the meeting. If you wish to make your comments heard, you must participate in the Zoom meeting.

There will be zero tolerance for any person addressing the Council making profane, offensive and disruptive remarks, or engaging in loud, boisterous, or other disorderly conduct, that disrupts the orderly conduct of the public meeting.
2 City Council Meeting – February 8, 2022
HOW TO VIEW OR PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING REMOTELY:

1. To view or participate in the meeting through Zoom
Livestream online at: https://cityofsanramon.zoom.us/j/99871056269 Webinar ID: 998 7105 6269
Use the “Raise Your Hand” button to request to speak when Public Comment is being taken on the Agenda item. You will then be unmuted when it is your turn to make your comment for up to three minutes. After the allotted time, you will then be re-muted.

2. To view the meeting live online at: www.sanramon.ca.gov/YouTube

3. To listen or participate in the meeting by telephone, dial: +1 (669) 900-6833 Webinar ID: 998 7105 6269
Use *9 on your telephone to raise your hand and request to speak when Public Comment is being taken on the Agenda item. You will then be unmuted when it is your turn to make your comment for up to three minutes. After the allotted time, you will then be remuted. 3 City Council Meeting – February 8, 2022

1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. ANNOUNCEMENTS

3.1 Changes and Additions to the Agenda

3.2 If you wish to speak under Public Comment or regarding an agenda item, please click the "Raise Your Hand" button on your computer or *9 on your telephone to request to speak when Public Comment is being taken on the Agenda item. You will then be unmuted when it is your turn to make your comment for up to 3 minutes. After the allotted time, you will then be re-muted.

3.3 Board, Committee and Commission Meetings
A complete list of upcoming meetings may be found on the City's website at:
www.sanramon.ca.gov. Subscription service is available at the link for automatic meeting notification. Contact the City Clerk with questions, (925) 973-2539.

4. PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the audience are encouraged to address the City Council on any non-agenda item.

Members of the public who are participating via Zoom will have the opportunity to make comments to the City Council live through the Zoom application.

Comments from the public on non-agenda items may also be submitted by email to [email protected]. Comments received by email will not be read aloud; however, they will be forwarded to the Council for their consideration. If you wish to present your comments to the public, you may do so via Zoom or telephone during this Public Comment period or the second Public Comment period, later in the meeting. No Council action can be taken at this meeting on issues raised during Public comment, whether submitted by email or Zoom. Those wishing to have an item brought before the City Council for consideration must request so during a City Council meeting. Upon Council approval, the item will be place on the Council Policy Committee Agenda for further consideration.

For the first round of Public Comment on non-agenda items, the first 10 people to speak will have three minutes to address the Council on matters not on the agenda. Any additional Public Comment will be accommodated later in the meeting.

5. CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are considered routine and are acted upon by the City Council with a single action. Members of the audience wishing to provide public input may request (by email to the City Clerk or under Item 4 Public Comment) that the City Council remove the item from the Consent Calendar. Members of the public may request that items be removed from the Consent Calendar, however, the decision to remove the item is solely at the discretion of the City Council.

With respect to the approval of resolutions and ordinances, the reading of the title thereto shall be deemed a motion to waive a reading of the complete resolution or ordinance and unless there is a request by a Council member that the resolution or ordinance be read in full, further reading of the resolution or ordinance shall be deemed waived by unanimous consent of the Council. 4 City Council Meeting – February 8, 2022

5.1 Minutes of the City Council Regular Meeting – January 25, 2022 Recommendation: Accept Minutes

5.2 Minute Order No. 2022-003 - Authorizing the Continued Use of Teleconferencing for the Meetings of All City Legislative Bodies for the Next 30 Days, Pursuant to the Provisions of AB 361 and as Adopted by Minute Order No. 2021-005 Recommendation: Approve Minute Order No. 2022-003

5.3 Minute Order No. 2022-004 - Authorizing Mayor Hudson to Attend the American Public Transportation Association’s 2022 Legislative Conference in Washington, DC on March 13-15, 2022 Sponsored by the Central Contra Costa Transit Authority
Recommendation: Approve Minute Order No. 2022-004

5.4 Resolution No. 2022-018 - Accepting Certain Roadway Dedications and Improvements in Road Acceptance 1250 for Maintenance (Shapell Industries, Inc./Toll Brothers)
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2022-018

5.5 Resolution No. 2022-019 - Accepting Certain Roadway Dedications and Improvements in Subdivision 9297 for Maintenance (Shapell Industries, Inc./Toll Brothers)
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2022-019

5.6 Resolution No. 2022-020 - Accepting Certain Roadway Dedications and Improvements in Subdivision 9298 for Maintenance (Shapell Industries, Inc./Toll Brothers)
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2022-020

6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

7. DEFERRED CONSENT ITEMS

8. CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS

9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS

9.1 Resolution No. 2022-021 - Designating Azalea Lane, Fuchsia Lane, Pearlgrass Lane, and Pearlgrass Court as Permanent Permit Parking Area “R” Under the City’s Residential Permit Parking Program, Restricting Parking Without a Valid Permit
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2022-021
Staff Report by: PJ Dhoot, Transportation Specialist
5 City Council Meeting – February 8, 2022

10. NEW BUSINESS

10.1 Resolution No. 2022-022 - Adopting the San Ramon Walking District Plan Guidelines
Recommendation: Staff Recommends that the City Council approve a Resolution Adopting the Walking District Plan with Changes Made to Address the Feedback from the Planning Commission and Parks & Community Services Commission Introduced by Lauren Barr, Planning Division Manager. Presentation by Stephanie Grigsby, Design Workshop

11. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS

12. PUBLIC COMMENT
At this time, those in the audience who have not previously spoken under the previous Public Comment (Agenda Item 4) are encouraged to address the City Council on any item not already included in tonight’s agenda. No Council action can be taken at this meeting on issues raised during Public Comment. Comments received live via Zoom will be limited to three minutes. Those wishing to have an item brought before the City Council for consideration must request so during a City Council meeting. Upon City Council approval, the item will be placed on the Council Policy Committee agenda for further consideration.

13. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS' AND MAYOR'S COMMENTS

14. ADJOURNMENT
I hereby certify the attached City Council agenda was posted 72 hours before the noted meeting.

Dated: February 4, 2022
6 City Council Meeting – February 8, 2022
The agenda with links to minutes and staff reports is available on the City’s website:
www.sanramon.ca.gov
* * * * *
This Agenda is posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2(a).

To request a disability-related accommodation(s) to participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk 24 hours in advance of the meeting at 925-973-2539. * * * * *
Information for public participation at Council meetings, including the time limits for addressing the Council, is provided on the agenda.

If you have any questions, please contact the City Clerk prior to the meeting. * * * * *
Regular City Council meetings are broadcast on Contra Costa Television (CCTV) (Channel 27) on Wednesdays at 7:00 p.m. and Thursdays at 1:00 p.m. immediately following the meeting.

Regular City Council meetings are also broadcast on AT&T U-Verse (Channel 99).

Regular City Council meetings may also be viewed at
http://sanramonca.iqm2.com/citizens/default.aspx

MINUTES OF THE

CITY OF SAN RAMON

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
January 25, 2022

1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m.

Prior to roll call, the City Attorney made an announcement that the meeting was conducted pursuant to the provisions under Assembly Bill 361 relaxing the requirements pertaining to remote meetings under the Brown Act. AB 361 authorizes state and local legislative bodies including the City Council, to hold public meetings by teleconference.

AB 361 allow public meetings accessible to the public via electronic means, including telephone.

The City Council and City Clerk were instructed to take roll call votes for the meeting.

The City Clerk conducted Roll Call.

Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Dave Hudson Mayor Present 7:00 PM
Sridhar Verose Vice Mayor Present 7:00 PM
Mark Armstrong Council Member Present 7:00 PM
Scott Perkins Council Member Present 7:00 PM
Sabina Zafar Councilmember Present 7:00 PM
Also in attendance City Manager Joe Gorton, City Attorney Martin Lysons, City Clerk Christina Franco, Deputy City Manager Steven Spedowfski, and Parks and Community Services Supervisor Adam Chow.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. ANNOUNCEMENTS

3.1 Changes and Additions to the Agenda

5.1 Packet Pg. 6
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jan 25, 2022 7:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 2 City Council Meeting – January 25, 2022

4. PUBLIC HEARING - REDISTRICTING

4.1 Public Hearing No. 2: the 2021-2022 Redistricting Process Recommendation: Receive the Staff Report, Open the Public Hearing, Receive Public Testimony, Close the Public Hearing, and Provide Staff and the City’s Demographer with Direction Regarding the Creation of the Initial Draft or Drafts of the Revised District Boundary Map
Deputy City Manager provided an overview of the staff report and public outreach for redistricting. Mr. Wagaman presented an overview of the process, next steps, and asked for comments from the Council and the public.

Cm. Perkins' motion to open the public hearing was seconded by Vice Mayor Verose. A roll call vote was taken and the motion was approved 5-0-0-0.

Public comment was received from Call In User 1, Kathleen Gage, and Kristina. Written public comment was received from Robert Martin.

Cm. Perkins' motion to close the public hearing was seconded by Cm. Zafar. A roll call vote was taken and the motion was approved 5-0-0-0.

The City Council provided comments to the demographer.

5. PUBLIC COMMENT
Public comment was received from Joyce Carr, Call In User 1, and Sarah Lashanlo.

6. CONSENT CALENDAR
Under Item 5 Public Comment, Call In User 1 requested that Items 6.3, 6.4, and 6.5 to be pulled for consent.

Before a motion was made to approve the consent calendar items, the Mayor read the following statement about item 6.9 in accordance with Government Code section 54953(c)(3):

At the January 11, 2022 regular City Council meeting, the City Council met in closed session to perform an evaluation of the City Manager. The City Council voted unanimously to increase the incumbent’s monthly salary to $24,500 and a one-time, nonPERSable payment of one thousand dollars ($1,000).

Cm. Zafar's motion to approve items 6.1-6.2 and 6.6-6.9 was seconded by Cm. Perkins.

A roll call vote was taken and the motion was approved 5-0-0-0.

5.1 Packet Pg. 7
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jan 25, 2022 7:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 3 City Council Meeting – January 25, 2022
RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Sabina Zafar, Councilmember
SECONDER: Scott Perkins, Councilmember
AYES: Hudson, Verose, Armstrong, Perkins, Zafar

6.1 Minutes of the City Council Regular Meeting and Closed Session - January 11, 2022 Recommendation: Accept Minutes

6.2 Minutes of the City Council Special Meeting - January 18, 2022 Recommendation: Accept Minutes

6.3 Register of Demands as Presented by the City Treasurer (Period Ending December 31, 2021)
Recommendation: Approve Register of Demands

6.4 City of San Ramon Quarterly Investment Report (Period Ending December 31, 2021)
Recommendation: Accept Report

6.5 Minute Order No. 2022-002 - Directing the City Clerk to Review and Prepare the Biennial Conflict of Interest Code for the City of San Ramon Recommendation: Approve Minute Order No. 2022-002

6.6 Resolution No. 2022-013 - Authorizing the Mayor to Execute the Tri-Valley Intergovernmental Reciprocal Services Master Agreement on Behalf of the City of San Ramon
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2022-013

6.7 Resolution No. 2022-014 - Authorizing the Filing of an Application for Transportation Development Act Article 3 Grant Funds in the Amount of $157,000 to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Design, Purchase, and Installation of Two Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon Systems - Pedestrian Enhancement Devices Project (CIP 975413)
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2022-014

6.8 Resolution No. 2022-015 - Accepting the Work by Bond Blacktop, Inc. for the Pavement Repair Stop Gap 2020/2021 Project (CIP 000002), the Pavement Management 2021 Project (CIP 000003), and the City Hall Reconfiguration Project (CIP 200001) as Complete, and Authorizing the City Clerk to File a Notice of Completion with the Contra Costa County Recorder's Office

5.1 Packet Pg. 8
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jan 25, 2022 7:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 4 City Council Meeting – January 25, 2022
Resolution No. 2022-016 - Accepting the Work by O’Grady Paving, Inc. for the Pavement Repair Stop Gap 2020/2021 Project (CIP 000002) and the Pavement Management 2021 Project (CIP 000003) as Complete, and Authorizing the City Clerk to File a Notice of Completion with the Contra Costa County Recorder's Office
Recommendation: Approve Resolutions No. 2022-015 and 2022-016

6.9 Resolution No. 2022-017 - Authorizing the Mayor to Sign the Sixth Amendment to Agreement for Employment of City Manager
Recommendation: Authorize Mayor to Sign Sixth Amendment 2022-017

7. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

8. DEFERRED CONSENT ITEMS

8.1 Register of Demands as Presented by the City Treasurer (Period Ending December 31, 2021)
Recommendation: Approve Register of Demands
Public comment was received from Call In User 1.

Cm. Perkins' motion to approve the Register of Demands as Presented by the City Treasurer (Period Ending December 31, 2021) was seconded by Vice Mayor Verose. A roll call vote was taken and the motion was approved 5-0-0-0.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Scott Perkins, Councilmember
SECONDER: Sridhar Verose, Vice Mayor
AYES: Hudson, Verose, Armstrong, Perkins, Zafar

8.2 City of San Ramon Quarterly Investment Report (Period Ending December 31, 2021)
Recommendation: Accept Report
Public comment was received from Call In User 1.

Cm. Perkins' motion to approve the City of San Ramon Quarterly Investment Report (Period Ending December 31, 2021) was seconded by Cm. Zafar. A roll call vote was taken and the motion was approved 5-0-0-0.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Scott Perkins, Councilmember
SECONDER: Sabina Zafar, Councilmember
AYES: Hudson, Verose, Armstrong, Perkins, Zafar

5.1 Packet Pg. 9
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jan 25, 2022 7:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 5 City Council Meeting – January 25, 2022

8.3 Minute Order No. 2022-002 - Directing the City Clerk to Review and Prepare the Biennial Conflict of Interest Code for the City of San Ramon Recommendation: Approve Minute Order No. 2022-002
Public comment was received from Call In User 1.

Cm. Perkins' motion to approve Minute Order No. 2022-002 Directing the City Clerk to Review and Prepare the Biennial Conflict of Interest Code for the City of San Ramon was seconded by Vice Mayor Verose. A roll call vote was taken and the motion was approved 5-0-0-0.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Scott Perkins, Councilmember
SECONDER: Sridhar Verose, Vice Mayor
AYES: Hudson, Verose, Armstrong, Perkins, Zafar

9. CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS

10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS

10.1 Public Meeting to Renew the San Ramon Valley Tourism Improvement District Recommendation: Staff Recommends the City Council Open Public Testimony to Allow Members of the Public to Provide Comments on the Renewal of the San Ramon Valley Tourism Improvement District (SRVTID).

Staff report by Deputy City Manager Steven Spedowfski.

Public comment was received from Call in User 1.

11. NEW BUSINESS

11.1 Arts Advisory Committee Annual Report
Recommendation: Accept Report
Recreation Supervisor Adam Chow introduced the item and David Owens, Chair of the Arts Advisory Committee. Mr. Owens provided the presentation of the annual report.

Public comment received from Call In User 1.

12. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS

13. PUBLIC COMMENT

14. CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS' AND MAYOR'S COMMENTS
Public comment received from Call in User 1.

5.1 Packet Pg. 10
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jan 25, 2022 7:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 6 City Council Meeting – January 25, 2022

15. ADJOURNMENT
Cm. Zafar's motion to adjourn the City Council meeting was seconded by Cm. Perkins. A roll call vote was taken and the motion was approved 5-0-0-0.

The meeting was adjourned at 8:57 p.m.

5.1 Packet Pg. 11
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Jan 25, 2022 7:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 8, 2022
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Christina Franco, City Clerk
By: Christina Franco, City Clerk
SUBJECT: MINUTE ORDER NO. 2022-003 - Authorizing the Continued Use of Teleconferencing for the Meetings of All City Legislative Bodies for the Next 30 Days, Pursuant to the Provisions of AB 361 and as Adopted by Minute Order No. 2021-005
This item is by title only.

5.2 Packet Pg. 12

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 8, 2022
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Christina Franco, City Clerk
By: Christina Franco, City Clerk
SUBJECT: MINUTE ORDER NO. 2022-004 - Authorizing Mayor Hudson to Attend the American Public Transportation Association’s 2022 Legislative Conference in Washington, DC on March 13-15, 2022 Sponsored by the Central Contra Costa Transit Authority

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt this Minute Order authorizing Mayor Hudson to attend the American Public Transportation Association’s (APTA) 2022 Legislative Conference in Washington, DC on March 13-15, 2022 sponsored by the Central Contra Costa Transit Authority (CCCTA).

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Mayor Hudson is the City’s primary representative to the CCCTA. Mayor Hudson serves on the CCCTA Board and represented CCCTA at last year’s Conference.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
The City of San Ramon’s Travel Policy adopted by Resolution No. 2021-135 which outlines the policies and procedures pertaining to travel by members of the City Council on official business.

The policy states that “Out-of-state travel not required for participation in the National League of Cities requires approval of the City Council in a public meeting.” Although not required, it is recommended that the City Council approve Mayor Hudson’s APTA related travel. CCCTA will pay the costs associated with Mayor Hudson’s trip to Washington, DC.

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Submit a Travel Report Form complete with documentation for related travel expenditures to the CCCTA.

5.3 Packet Pg. 13

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 8, 2022
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Maria Fierner, Public Works Director
By: Christopher Low, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-018 - Accepting Certain Roadway Dedications and Improvements in Road Acceptance 1250 for Maintenance (Shapell Industries, Inc./Toll Brothers)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Dougherty Valley is a master-planned community located east of Alcosta Boulevard and contains the Gale Ranch and Windemere developments. Approved by Contra Costa County, the Dougherty Valley is developed under the terms of the Dougherty Valley Settlement Agreement and Dougherty Valley Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Road Acceptance (RA) 1250 is located east of Dougherty Road near Bella Vista Elementary School and includes roadway improvements for Hibiscus Road, Trumpet Vine Lane, Trefoil Road, and Zinnia Court in Gale Ranch Phase 4. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors has adopted the Resolution for the completion of the roadway improvements. Staff recommends acceptance of the improvements for ownership and maintenance as obligated by the Dougherty Valley MOU.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends adoption of this Resolution accepting certain roadway dedications and improvements in Road Acceptance 1250 for maintenance (Shapell Industries, Inc./Toll Brothers).

BACKGROUND
The Dougherty Valley is a master-planned community of approximately 11,000 units that was approved in 1994 by Contra Costa County. The community is developed under the terms of the Dougherty Valley Settlement Agreement and Dougherty Valley Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The Settlement Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding essentially lay out the ground rules for all parties involved in the processing and development of Dougherty Valley, which includes the County, the City, the Town of Danville, and the Dougherty Valley developers (Windemere BLC and Shapell Homes).

The purpose of the Memorandum of Understanding (executed in 1998) is to:

5.4 Packet Pg. 14
 outline the roles and responsibilities of the agencies involved in the processing, completion, operation, and maintenance of the Dougherty Valley Development (Project);  detail procedures for distributing property taxes and special assessments collected;  ensure that the ownership of and responsibility for maintaining public improvements for the Project is efficiently and effectively transferred from the County to the City; and  ensure that the annexation of property from County to City takes place in a cooperative manner.

The Settlement Agreement (executed in 1994) also memorializes provisions to ensure orderly development, annexation, operation, and maintenance of facilities and infrastructure, and delivery of public services in accordance with certain standards agreed to by all parties.

This Agreement dismisses all previous claims by the City and Town of Danville in order to have a mutually agreed upon outlined plan for the orderly development of the Dougherty Valley.

Per the Settlement Agreement, Contra Costa County is the lead agency for processing the development approvals in the Dougherty Valley. These development approvals lead to the construction of roadways and drainage improvements, landscape improvements, parks, trails, and community facilities. In accordance with the Settlement Agreement and MOU, the County distributes the development plans to the City for review and comment. The County approves the plans and determines when the public improvements are complete, authorizes bond reductions, and if applicable to the project, begins a warranty period. The City typically conducts periodic joint inspections with the County and gives its concurrence for acceptance prior to the County taking action. With the joint agreement that the improvements are acceptable, the County proceeds with acceptance through the County Board of Supervisors. Under notice that the County has accepted the improvements, and upon request of the developer, the City then proceeds with acceptance by the City Council. For landscape improvements, City acceptance occurs after the completion of the warranty period, which is generally one year. Once the City Council has accepted the improvements and associated land dedications, the City takes full ownership and maintenance of the improvements.

To date, the City has accepted for maintenance:
 Road and storm drain improvements for 72 subdivisions;  Road and storm drain improvements for 58 road acceptances;  Landscape improvements for 73 subdivisions;
 Landscape improvements for 47 road acceptances;
 33 parks and school parks, including Rancho San Ramon Community Park and the Amador Rancho Center, plus landscape at Dougherty Valley High School;  Site and landscape improvements at the Dougherty Station Community Center/Library;  Site improvements at the Dougherty Valley Service Center and the Amador Rancho Center;
 West Alamo Creek Trail, Tassajara Ridge Trail, Windemere Ridge Trail, Live Oak Trail, Monarch Ridge Trail, Monarch Loop Trail, Star Jasmine Trail, Sycamore Grove Trail, Rolling Hills Trail, Basswood Trail, Old Dougherty Road Trail, a portion of the Alamo Creek Trail, Dougherty Valley Ridge Trail, Coyote Canyon Trail, Quail Run Trail, Jack

5.4 Packet Pg. 15
Rabbit Ridge Trail, Overlook Park, and surrounding landscape improvements in Gale Ranch;
 The water fountain landscape entry feature on Bollinger Canyon Road;  Gale Ranch Community Identification Monument improvements on Bollinger Canyon Road;
 Windemere Tower improvements on Bollinger Canyon Road at Dougherty Valley High School;
 Windemere Entry Sign improvements on Bollinger Canyon Road near the Dougherty Station Community Center/Library;
 Creek improvements in portions of the Main Branch and West Branch of Alamo Creek, and designated mitigation creeks;
 Water Quality Ponds W3, W4, M1A and M2A, and Bioswales W1 and W2 in Gale Ranch;
 Water Quality Ponds 1-9, 11, and 14 plus Pond 14 Outfall, and detention basin DA 0005 in Windemere; and
 Miscellaneous storm drain improvements for four (4) drainage acceptances.

To date, the City has accepted approximately 72 miles of roadway, approximately 216 acres of public landscape, 128 acres of park area, and approximately 21.3 miles of trails.

DISCUSSION
Contra Costa County has designated RA 1250 as the roadway improvements for Hibiscus Road, Trumpet Vine Lane, Trefoil Road, and Zinnia Court located east of Dougherty Road near Bella Vista Elementary School (Attachment A).

Hibiscus Road, Trumpet Vine Lane, Trefoil Road, and Zinnia Court were dedicated to Contra Costa County or its successor for roadway purposes through an Offer of Dedication in DOC2015-38221 of Contra Costa County Records. (Attachment B).

The streets and applicable roadway lengths within RA 1250 are listed below:
1) Hibiscus Road (317 feet)
2) Trumpet Vine Lane (1,426 feet)
3) Trefoil Road (845 feet)
4) Zinnia Court (486 feet)
RA 1250 includes approximately 3,074 feet of roadway, 26 street lights, and 34 storm drain inlets/manholes/catch basins.

Storm Drain Easement
This acceptance includes a 7,184 square foot public storm drain easement on a portion of Parcel L of Subdivision 8306 located at the southern end of Zinnia Court. Contra Costa County accepted the storm drain easement for recording purposes only on March 3, 2015 with the adoption of Resolution No. 2015/61. The Offer of Dedication and County action are recorded in

5.4 Packet Pg. 16
DOC-2016-0231667-00 (Attachment C). Staff recommends the City Council accept this storm drain easement.

Public Utility Easements
Fronting the roadways within RA 1250 are 5-foot-wide Public Utility Easements that have been dedicated to the public for public utility purposes, which include: poles, wires, and conduits; flood and surface water drainage; water lines; gas lines; electric, telephone, and cable television utilities; rights of ingress and egress; construction and reconstruction; and access for maintenance work, improvements, structures, and the clearing of obstructions and vegetation.

The Public Utility Easements were dedicated through the filing of the Final Map for Subdivision 9341 and affect the following lots:
 Lots 1-29, 80, 82, 85, 86, 87, and 94, fronting Trumpet Vine Lane  Lots 30-36 and 40-47 fronting Zinnia Court
 Lots 49-56, 61, 62, 67, 68, 73, 74, 78, 79, and Parcel A (becomes a portion of Subdivision 9298), fronting Trefoil Road
 Lots 57 and 58 fronting Goldfield Place
Additional larger public utility easements to be accepted are located on Lot 38-40 fronting Zinnia Court and Lot 45 and Lot 46 between Zinnia Court and Hibiscus Road.

Sight Distance Easements
This acceptance also includes Sight Distance Easements that have been dedicated to Contra Costa County, its designee, or its successor as a non-exclusive surface easement for sight distance purposes including the clearing of obstructions and vegetation for the purpose of maintaining the area such that no structures or vegetation are higher than two feet above the top of curb. These Sight Distance Easements are located at the following lots:
 Lot 46 at the intersection of Hibiscus Road and Trumpet Vine Lane/Zinnia Court  Lot 48 on Zinnia Court
 Lot 56 at the intersection of Trefoil Road and Arrowleaf Street  Lot 57 at the intersection of Trefoil Road and Goldfield Place  Lots 79 and 80 at the intersection of Trefoil Road and Trumpet Vine Lane  Lot 85 at the intersection of Silvercrown Way and Trumpet Vine Lane Relinquishment of Abutter’s Rights of Access
Finally, staff recommends accepting the Relinquishment of Abutter’s Rights of Access for pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress across Dougherty Road per the Final Map for Subdivision 9341.

Contra Costa County Acceptance of Improvements
On November 15, 2016, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No.

5.4 Packet Pg. 17
2016/599 accepting the completion of the roadway improvements in RA 1250 (Attachment D).

On April 19, 2019, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2019/98 to correct the roadway lengths for Trumpet Vine Lane and Zinnia Court noted on County Resolution No. 2016/599 (Attachment E).

On November 17, 2020, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2020/293 accepting the completion of the warranty period for the roadway improvements in RA 1250 (Attachment F).

The roadway improvements for RA 1250 are being presented at this time as all home building within this RA and the area around Bella Vista Elementary School has been completed and Toll Brothers no longer has the need to transport heavy construction vehicles on these roadways.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
Upon acceptance, the City will incur certain maintenance responsibilities that are estimated to cost $7,850 annually. These estimated annual costs include: $850 for street sweeping; $1,300 for storm drain cleaning; $1,050 for routine striping and emergency roadway repairs; $2,050 for utilities (electric); and $2,600 for street lighting supplies and maintenance.

Funding for these annual maintenance costs is to be reimbursed by the County Service Area (CSA) M-29 assessment for Dougherty Valley.

The estimated total cost for the roadway improvements in RA 1250 is $2,397,000.

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Following the acceptance of these public improvements, an executed copy of this Resolution will be recorded at the Contra Costa County Recorder’s Office. The Public Works - Public Services Division will coordinate with the developer for the transfer of utility bills and begin maintenance of these roadway improvements on February 9, 2022.

ATTACHMENT:

A: Location Map RA_1250
B: County Reso 2015-60 (Accept Offer of Dedication)
C: County DOC-2016-0231667-00 (Drainage Easement)
D: County Resolution 2016-599 (Accept Improvements)
E: County Reso 2019-098 (Correcting Error on 2016-599)
F: County Reso 2020-293 (End Warranty)

5.4 Packet Pg. 18
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-018

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON

ACCEPTING CERTAIN ROADWAY DEDICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS IN ROAD ACCEPTANCE 1250 FOR MAINTENANCE (SHAPELL INDUSTRIES, INC./TOLL BROTHERS)
WHEREAS, Contra Costa County has designated Hibiscus Road, Trumpet Vine Lane, Trefoil Road, and Zinnia Court as Road Acceptance (RA) 1250; and WHEREAS, Hibiscus Road, Trumpet Vine Lane, Trefoil Road, and Zinnia Court within RA 1250 were dedicated to Contra Costa County or its successor for public roadway purposes under a separate instrument with DOC-2015-38221 of Contra Costa County Records; and WHEREAS, certain public easements within RA 1250 were dedicated through the filing of Final Maps 8306 and 9341 approved by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors on July 11, 2006 and October 6, 2015, respectively; and
WHEREAS, the public improvements for RA 1250 include approximately 3,074 feet of roadway, 26 street lights, and 34 storm drain inlets/catch basins/manholes; and WHEREAS, these public improvements have been constructed and inspected consistent with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding dated October 15, 1997 between Contra Costa County, the City of San Ramon, Shapell Industries, Inc., and Windemere Ranch Partners; and
WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Public Works Department has determined, upon conferring with the City Engineer, that these public improvements have been completed by Shapell Industries, Inc./Toll Brothers as required and has recommended that the County Board of Supervisors accept these public improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2016/599 on November 15, 2016, which accepted the completion of public improvements for RA 1250; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2019/98 on April 19, 2019, which corrected roadway lengths on Contra Costa County Resolution No. 2016/599; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2020/293 on November 17, 2020, which accepted the completion of warranty period of the public improvements for RA 1250; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has determined that the public improvements are now ready for acceptance by the City for maintenance; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Ramon is obligated by the Memorandum of Understanding

5.4 Packet Pg. 19
to accept the public landscape improvements for maintenance if the annexation process has been completed or initiated; and
WHEREAS, the annexation process for the areas that contain RA 1250 has been completed.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the hereinafter described streets, as shown and offered for public use on DOC2015-38221 of Contra Costa County Records; of Contra Costa County, State of California, are hereby accepted and declared to be City streets:

STREET R/W & C/C (ft) LENGTH (ft)
Hibiscus Road 70 & 52 and varies 317
Trumpet Vine Lane 49 & 36 and 46 & 36 1,426
Trefoil Road 64 & 44 and 46 & 36 845
Zinnia Court 56 & 36 and varies 486

2. That the hereinafter described storm drain easement, as shown and offered for public maintenance on DOC-2016-0231667-00 is hereby accepted.

3. That the hereinafter described public utility easements, as shown and offered for public maintenance on the Final Map for Subdivision 9341 filed in Book 526 of Maps on Page 46 are hereby accepted:
a. Five-foot-wide Public Utility Easements on:
1) Lots 1-29, 80, 82, 85, 86, 87, and 94 fronting Trumpet Vine Lane. 2) Lots 30-36 and 40-47 fronting Zinnia Court.
3) Lots 49-56, 61, 62, 67, 68, 73, 74, 78, 79, and Parcel A fronting Trefoil Road. 4) Lots 57 and 58 fronting Goldfield Place.
b. Public Utility Easements:
1) On Lots 38, 39, and 40 fronting Zinnia Court.
2) On Lots 45 and 46 between Zinnia Court and Hibiscus Road.

4. That the hereinafter described sight distance easements, as shown and offered for public maintenance on the Final Map for Subdivision 9341 filed in Book 526 of Maps on Page 46 are hereby accepted:
a. Lot 46 at the intersection of Hibiscus Road and Trumpet Vine Lane/Zinnia Court. b. Lot 48 on Zinnia Court.
c. Lot 56 at the intersection of Trefoil Road and Arrowleaf Street. d. Lot 57 at the intersection of Trefoil Road and Goldfield Place. e. Lots 79 and 80 at the intersection of Trefoil Road and Trumpet Vine Lane. f. Lot 85 at the intersection of Silvercrown Way and Trumpet Vine Lane.

5.4 Packet Pg. 20

5. That the Relinquishment of Abutter’s Rights as shown on the Final Map for Subdivision 9341 are hereby accepted.

6. That the publicly dedicated roadway and storm drain improvements as shown on the plan entitled “Improvement Plans Road Acceptance 1250 Gale Ranch Phase 4”, are hereby accepted.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the meeting of February 8, 2022 by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________
David E. Hudson, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Christina Franco, City Clerk

5.4 Packet Pg. 21

ZINNIA CT
T
R
U
M
P
ET
VIN
E
L
N
D
O
U
G
H
E
R
T
Y
R
D

TRUMPET VINE LN

TREFOIL RD
G
O
L
D
FIE
L
D
P
L

RANCHO PARK LOOP

HIBISCUS RD
A
R
R
O
W
L
E
A
F
S
T

SILVERCROWN WAY

ATTACHMENT A
Bella Vista
Elementary
School
±

PORTION OF ROADWAY TO BE ACCEPTED

PUBLIC UTILITY
EASEMENT (TYP.)
SUBDIVISION 9297

BOUNDARY
SUBDIVISION 9341

BOUNDARY
1 1
1 2 1
3 SUBDIVISION 9341

BOUNDARY
GO
L
D
F
EI L
D
P
L

LOCATION MAP

GALE RANCH

ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
RA 1250

PARCEL L
SUBDIVISON 8306
SUBD 9297
SUBD 9297
SUBD 9341
37 38
39 40
SUBD 9341
SUBD 9298
5 4
1 1
SUBD 9341
SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT (TYP. 6 TOTAL)
TO BE ACCEPTED 1
2 RELINQUISHMENT OF ABUTTER'S RIGHTS OF

ACCESS ON DOUGHERTY RD TO BE ACCEPTED
3 STORM DRAIN EASEMENT ON LOTS 37 - 40
& PARCEL L (SUBD 8306) TO BE ACCEPTED

PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT BETWEEN

HIBISCUS RD AND ZINNIA CT
4 PUBLIC UTLITY EASEMENT
ON LOTS 38 - 40
5 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 36
35 34
33 32
30 31
29 28
27 26
25 24
23 22
21 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
11 10
9 8
7 6
5 4
1 2
3 49
50 51
56 55 54 53 52
57 61 62 67 68 73 74
78 79
80 82
85 86
87 94
58 5.4.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: A: Location Map RA_1250 (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

ATTACHMENT B

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: B: County Reso 2015-60 (Accept Offer of Dedication) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: B: County Reso 2015-60 (Accept Offer of Dedication) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: B: County Reso 2015-60 (Accept Offer of Dedication) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: B: County Reso 2015-60 (Accept Offer of Dedication) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: B: County Reso 2015-60 (Accept Offer of Dedication) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: B: County Reso 2015-60 (Accept Offer of Dedication) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: B: County Reso 2015-60 (Accept Offer of Dedication) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: B: County Reso 2015-60 (Accept Offer of Dedication) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: B: County Reso 2015-60 (Accept Offer of Dedication) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: B: County Reso 2015-60 (Accept Offer of Dedication) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: B: County Reso 2015-60 (Accept Offer of Dedication) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: B: County Reso 2015-60 (Accept Offer of Dedication) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: B: County Reso 2015-60 (Accept Offer of Dedication) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: B: County Reso 2015-60 (Accept Offer of Dedication) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

ATTACHMENT C

5.4.c
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: C: County DOC-2016-0231667-00 (Drainage Easement) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.c
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: C: County DOC-2016-0231667-00 (Drainage Easement) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.c
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: C: County DOC-2016-0231667-00 (Drainage Easement) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.c
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: C: County DOC-2016-0231667-00 (Drainage Easement) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.c
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: C: County DOC-2016-0231667-00 (Drainage Easement) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.c
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: C: County DOC-2016-0231667-00 (Drainage Easement) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.c
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: C: County DOC-2016-0231667-00 (Drainage Easement) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.c
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: C: County DOC-2016-0231667-00 (Drainage Easement) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

ATTACHMENT D

5.4.d
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: D: County Resolution 2016-599 (Accept Improvements) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.d
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: D: County Resolution 2016-599 (Accept Improvements) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.d
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: D: County Resolution 2016-599 (Accept Improvements) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

ATTACHMENT E

5.4.e
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: E: County Reso 2019-098 (Correcting Error on 2016-599) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.e
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: E: County Reso 2019-098 (Correcting Error on 2016-599) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.e
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: E: County Reso 2019-098 (Correcting Error on 2016-599) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

ATTACHMENT F

5.4.f
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: F: County Reso 2020-293 (End Warranty) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.f
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: F: County Reso 2020-293 (End Warranty) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

5.4.f
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: F: County Reso 2020-293 (End Warranty) (2022-018 : Acceptance of RA 1250)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 8, 2022
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Maria Fierner, Public Works Director
By: Christopher Low, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-019 - Accepting Certain Roadway Dedications and Improvements in Subdivision 9297 for Maintenance (Shapell Industries, Inc./Toll Brothers)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Dougherty Valley is a master-planned community located east of Alcosta Boulevard and contains the Gale Ranch and Windemere developments. Approved by Contra Costa County, the Dougherty Valley is developed under the terms of the Dougherty Valley Settlement Agreement and Dougherty Valley Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Subdivision 9297 includes roadway improvements for Goldfield Place and Silvercrown Way in Gale Ranch Phase 4. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors has adopted resolutions for the completion of improvements and warranty period. Staff recommends acceptance of the improvements for ownership and maintenance as obligated by the Dougherty Valley MOU.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends approval of this Resolution accepting certain roadway dedications and improvements in Subdivision 9297 for maintenance (Shapell Industries, Inc./Toll Brothers).

The purpose of the Memorandum of Understanding (executed in 1998) is to:
 outline the roles and responsibilities of the agencies involved in the processing, completion, operation, and maintenance of the Dougherty Valley Development (Project);

5.5 Packet Pg. 54
 detail procedures for distributing property taxes and special assessments collected;  ensure that the ownership of and responsibility for maintaining public improvements for the Project is efficiently and effectively transferred from the County to the City; and  ensure that the annexation of property from County to City takes place in a cooperative manner.

This Agreement dismisses all previous claims by the City and Town of Danville in order to have a mutually agreed upon outlined plan for the orderly development of the Dougherty Valley.

5.5 Packet Pg. 55
 The water fountain landscape entry feature on Bollinger Canyon Road;  Gale Ranch Community Identification Monument improvements on Bollinger Canyon Road;
 Windemere Tower improvements on Bollinger Canyon Road at Dougherty Valley High School;
 Windemere Entry Sign improvements on Bollinger Canyon Road near the Dougherty Station Community Center/Library;
 Creek improvements in portions of the Main Branch and West Branch of Alamo Creek, and designated mitigation creeks;
 Water Quality Ponds W3, W4, M1A and M2A, and Bioswales W1 and W2 in Gale Ranch;
 Water Quality Ponds 1-9, 11, and 14 plus Pond 14 Outfall, and detention basin DA 0005 in Windemere; and
 Miscellaneous storm drain improvements for four (4) drainage acceptances.

To date, the City has accepted approximately 72 miles of roadway, approximately 216 acres of public landscape, 128 acres of park area, and approximately 21.3 miles of trails.

DISCUSSION
Subdivision 9297 is a 57-lot residential subdivision within the Gale Ranch Phase 4 development and is part of a re-subdivision of Subdivision 9341. Subdivision 9297 is located east of Dougherty Road and north of Bella Vista Elementary School (Attachment A).

The streets and applicable roadway lengths within Subdivision 9297 are listed below:
1) Goldfield Place (475 feet)
2) Silvercrown Way (370 feet)
Subdivision 9297 includes approximately 845 feet of roadway, 9 streetlights, and 17 storm drain inlets/catch basins/manholes.

This acceptance also includes 5-foot-wide Public Utility Easements fronting each of the lots or parcels in Subdivision 9297, which coincide on the recommended roadways to be accepted. The Public Utility Easements have been dedicated to the public for public utility purposes, which include: poles, wires, and conduits; flood and surface water drainage; water lines; gas lines; electric, telephone, and cable television utilities; rights of ingress and egress; construction and reconstruction; and access for maintenance work, improvements, structures, and the clearing of obstructions and vegetation. The affected lots and parcels in Subdivision 9297 include Lots 101, 104, 105, 110, 111, 116, 117, 120, 123, 124, 127, 129, 130, 156, and 157 on Goldfield Place and Lots 128, 133, 134, 139, 140, 141, 146, 147, 152, 153, and 157 on Silvercrown Way. All of these lots are privately owned subsequent to the recording of the Final Map for Subdivision 9297.

Additionally, this acceptance includes Sight Distance Easements located on Lots 128 and 157 at the intersection of Goldfield Place and Silvercrown Way, and Lot 140 at the intersection of Silvercrown Way and Trumpet Vine Lane. The Sight Distance Easements have been dedicated to

5.5 Packet Pg. 56
Contra Costa County, its designee, or its successor as a non-exclusive surface easement for sight distance purposes including the clearing of obstructions and vegetation for the purpose of maintaining the area such that no structures or vegetation are higher than two feet above the top of curb.

This acceptance also includes a Maintenance Access Easement on Lot 123 and Lot 124 located at the south end of Goldfield Place adjacent to the ballfields at Bella Vista Elementary School.

The maintenance access easement is dedicated to Contra Costa County, its designee, or its successor for maintenance access purposes.

Finally, staff recommends accepting the Relinquishment of Abutter’s Rights of Access for pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress across Trefoil Road per the Final Map for Subdivision 9297.

On September 12, 2017, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2017/318 and accepted the roadway improvements in Subdivision 9297 as complete (Attachment B).

On September 17, 2019, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2019/552 and accepted completion of the warranty period for the roadway improvements in Subdivision 9297 (Attachment C).

The roadway improvements for Subdivision 9297 are being presented at this time as all home building within this subdivision and the area around Bella Vista Elementary School has been completed and Toll Brothers no longer has the need to transport heavy construction vehicles on these roadways.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
Upon acceptance, the City will incur certain maintenance responsibilities that are estimated to cost $2,655 annually. These estimated annual costs include: $300 for street sweeping; $655 for storm drain cleaning; $350 for routine striping and emergency roadway repairs; $600 for utilities (electric); and $750 for street lighting supplies and maintenance.

Funding for these annual maintenance costs is to be reimbursed by the County Service Area (CSA) M-29 assessment for Dougherty Valley.

The estimated total cost for the roadway improvements for Subdivision 9297 is $1,687,000.

5.5 Packet Pg. 57
ATTACHMENT:

A: Location Map Subd_9297
B: County Resolution 2017-318
C: County Resolution 2019-552

5.5 Packet Pg. 58
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-019

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON

ACCEPTING CERTAIN ROADWAY DEDICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS IN SUBDIVISION 9297 FOR MAINTENANCE (SHAPELL INDUSTRIES, INC./TOLL

BROTHERS)
WHEREAS, Subdivision 9297 is a re-subdivision of Parcel B of Subdivision 9341; and WHEREAS, roadways and certain public utility easements within Subdivision 9297 were originally dedicated through the filing of Final Map 9341; and WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approved the Final Map for Subdivision 9341 and Subdivision 9297 on October 6, 2015 and February 9, 2016, respectively, containing certain road improvement requirements for the subdivision acceptance; and WHEREAS, the public improvements for Subdivision 9297 include approximately 845 feet of roadway, 9 streetlights, and 17 storm drain inlets/catch basins/manholes; and WHEREAS, these public improvements have been constructed and inspected consistent with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding dated October 15, 1997, between Contra Costa County, the City of San Ramon, Shapell Industries, Inc., and Windemere Ranch Partners; and
WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Public Works Department has determined, upon conferring with the City Engineer, that these public improvements have been completed by Shapell Industries, Inc./Toll Brothers as required and has recommended that the County Board of Supervisors accept these public improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2017/318 on September 12, 2017, which accepted the completion of public improvements for Subdivision 9297; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2019/552 on September 17, 2019, which accepted the completion of the warranty period for Subdivision 9297; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has determined that the public improvements are now ready for acceptance by the City for maintenance; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Ramon is obligated by the Memorandum of Understanding to accept the public improvements for maintenance if the annexation process has been completed or initiated; and
WHEREAS, the annexation process for the area that contains Subdivision 9297 has been completed.

5.5 Packet Pg. 59
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the hereinafter described streets, as shown and offered for public use on the Final Map for Subdivision 9297 filed in Book 527 of Maps on Page 39, Official Records of Contra Costa County, State of California, are hereby accepted and declared to be City streets:

STREET R/W & C/C (ft) LENGTH (ft)
Goldfield Place 46 & 36 475
Silvercrown Way 46 & 36 370

2. That the hereinafter described 5-foot-wide public utility easements, as shown and offered for public maintenance on the Final Map for Subdivision 9297 filed in Book 527 of Maps on Page 39 are hereby accepted:
a. Lots 101, 104, 105, 110, 111, 116, 117, 120, 123, 124, 127, 129, 130, 156, and 157 fronting Goldfield Place.
b. Lots 128, 133, 134, 139, 140, 141, 146, 147, 152, 153, and 157 fronting Silvercrown Way.

3. That the hereinafter described sight easements, as shown and offered for public maintenance on the Final Map for Subdivision 9297 filed in Book 527 of Maps on

Page 39 ends

a. Lots 128 and 157 at the intersection of Goldfield Place and Silvercrown Way. b. Lot 140 at the intersection of Silvercrown Way and Trumpet Vine Lane.

4. That the Maintenance Easements on Lots 123 and 124, as shown and offered for public maintenance on the Final Map for Subdivision 9297 filed in Book 527 of Maps on Page 39 are hereby accepted.

5. That the Relinquishment of Abutter’s Rights as shown on the Final Map for Subdivision 9297 are hereby accepted.

6. That the publicly dedicated roadway and storm drain improvements as shown on the plan entitled “Improvement Plans Subdivision 9297 Gale Ranch Phase 4” are hereby accepted.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the meeting of February 8, 2022 by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

5.5 Packet Pg. 60
ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________
David E. Hudson, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Christina Franco, City Clerk

5.5 Packet Pg. 61

TRUMPET
V
NI E
LAN
E
D
O
U
G
H
E
R
TY
R
D

TREFOIL ROAD
G
O
L
D
F
EI L
D
P
LAC
E

SILVERCROWN WAY

LOCATION MAP

ATTACHMENT A

GALE RANCH

ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
SUBDIVISION 9297
Bella Vista
Elementary School
±
SUBDIVISION 9297

BOUNDARY

PUBLIC UTILITY
EASEMENT (TYP.)
123
124
2 RELINQUISHMENT OF ABUTTER'S RIGHTS

OF ACCESS ON TREFOIL RD TO BE ACCEPTED

MAINTENANCE ACCESS EASEMENT
ON LOTS 123 & 124 TO BE ACCEPTED
SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT (TYP. 3 TOTAL)
TO BE ACCEPTED 1

PORTION OF ROADWAY TO BE ACCEPTED
3 1
3 1
1 2
101
104
105
110
111
116
117
120 127
130
129
128
157
156
133 134 139 140
141 147 146 153 152

5.5.a
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: A: Location Map Subd_9297 (2022-019 : Acceptance of SD 9297)

ATTACHMENT B

5.5.b
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: B: County Resolution 2017-318 (2022-019 : Acceptance of SD 9297)

5.5.b
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: B: County Resolution 2017-318 (2022-019 : Acceptance of SD 9297)

5.5.b
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: B: County Resolution 2017-318 (2022-019 : Acceptance of SD 9297)

5.5.b
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: B: County Resolution 2017-318 (2022-019 : Acceptance of SD 9297)

ATTACHMENT C

5.5.c
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: C: County Resolution 2019-552 (2022-019 : Acceptance of SD 9297)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 8, 2022
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Maria Fierner, Public Works Director
By: Christopher Low, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-020 - Accepting Certain Roadway Dedications and Improvements in Subdivision 9298 for Maintenance (Shapell Industries, Inc./Toll Brothers)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Dougherty Valley is a master-planned community located east of Alcosta Boulevard and contains the Gale Ranch and Windemere developments. Approved by Contra Costa County, the Dougherty Valley is developed under the terms of the Dougherty Valley Settlement Agreement and Dougherty Valley Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Subdivision 9298 includes roadway improvements for Goldfield Place, Trumpet Vine Lane, Arrowleaf Street, and Woodshore Court in Gale Ranch Phase 4. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors has adopted resolutions for the completion of improvements and warranty period. Staff recommends acceptance of the improvements for ownership and maintenance as obligated by the Dougherty Valley MOU.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends approval of this Resolution accepting certain roadway dedications and improvements in Subdivision 9298 for maintenance (Shapell Industries, Inc./Toll Brothers).

The purpose of the Memorandum of Understanding (executed in 1998) is to:
 outline the roles and responsibilities of the agencies involved in the processing,

5.6 Packet Pg. 68
completion, operation, and maintenance of the Dougherty Valley Development (Project);  detail procedures for distributing property taxes and special assessments collected;  ensure that the ownership of and responsibility for maintaining public improvements for the Project is efficiently and effectively transferred from the County to the City; and  ensure that the annexation of property from County to City takes place in a cooperative manner.

This Agreement dismisses all previous claims by the City and Town of Danville in order to have a mutually agreed upon outlined plan for the orderly development of the Dougherty Valley.

5.6 Packet Pg. 69
Ranch;
 The water fountain landscape entry feature on Bollinger Canyon Road;  Gale Ranch Community Identification Monument improvements on Bollinger Canyon Road;
 Windemere Tower improvements on Bollinger Canyon Road at Dougherty Valley High School;
 Windemere Entry Sign improvements on Bollinger Canyon Road near the Dougherty Station Community Center/Library;
 Creek improvements in portions of the Main Branch and West Branch of Alamo Creek, and designated mitigation creeks;
 Water Quality Ponds W3, W4, M1A and M2A, and Bioswales W1 and W2 in Gale Ranch;
 Water Quality Ponds 1-9, 11, and 14 plus Pond 14 Outfall, and detention basin DA 0005 in Windemere; and
 Miscellaneous storm drain improvements for four (4) drainage acceptances.

To date, the City has accepted approximately 72 miles of roadway, approximately 216 acres of public landscape, 128 acres of park area, and approximately 21.3 miles of trails.

DISCUSSION
Subdivision 9298 is an 86-lot residential subdivision within the Gale Ranch Phase 4 development and is part of a re-subdivision of new Parcel A described in the Deed recorded December 12, 2017 under DOC 2017-0232356. Subdivision 9298 is located east of Dougherty Road and north of Trefoil Road near Bella Vista Elementary School (Attachment A).

The streets and applicable roadway lengths within Subdivision 9298 are listed below:
1) Goldfield Place (528 feet)
2) Trumpet Vine Lane (1,162 feet)
3) Arrowleaf Street (475 feet)
4) Woodshore Court (264 feet)
Subdivision 9298 includes approximately 2,429 feet of roadway, 22 streetlights, and 16 storm drain inlets/catch basins/manholes.

This acceptance includes 5-foot-wide Public Utility Easements fronting each of the lots or parcels in Subdivision 9298, which coincide on the recommended roadways to be accepted. The Public Utility Easements have been dedicated to the public for public utility purposes, which include: poles, wires, and conduits; flood and surface water drainage; water lines; gas lines; electric, telephone, and cable television utilities; rights of ingress and egress; construction and reconstruction; and access for maintenance work, improvements, structures, and the clearing of obstructions and vegetation. The affected lots and parcels in Subdivision 9298 include Lots 101- 112 and 168-176 on Goldfield Place, Lots 113-153 and 176-178 on Trumpet Vine Lane, Lots 153-156, 167, and 178-186 on Arrowleaf Street, and Lots 156-167 on Woodshore Court. All of these lots are privately owned subsequent to the recording of the Final Map for Subdivision

5.6 Packet Pg. 70
9298.

Additionally, this acceptance includes Sight Distance Easements dedicated to Contra Costa County, its designee, or its successor as a non-exclusive surface easement for sight distance purposes including the clearing of obstructions and vegetation for the purpose of maintaining the area such that no structures or vegetation are higher than two feet above the top of curb. These Sight Distance Easements are located on Lots 101 and 168 at the intersection of Goldfield Place and Trefoil Road, Lot 176 at the intersection of Goldfield Place and Trumpet Vine Lane, Lot 153 and 178 at the intersection of Arrowleaf Street and Trumpet View Lane, Lot 156 and 167 at the intersection of Woodshore Court and Arrowleaf Street, Lot 186 at the intersection of Arrowleaf Street and Trefoil Road, and Lot 139 at the intersection of Trefoil Road and Trumpet Vine Lane.

Finally, staff recommends accepting the Relinquishment of Abutter’s Rights of Access for pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress across Trefoil Road per the Final Map for Subdivision 9298.

On March 31, 2020, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2020/99 and accepted the roadway improvements in Subdivision 9298 as complete (Attachment B).

On October 12, 2021, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2021/315 and accepted the warranty period for the roadway improvements in Subdivision 9298 (Attachment C).

The roadway improvements for Subdivision 9298 are being presented at this time as all home building within this subdivision and the area around Bella Vista Elementary School has been completed, and Toll Brothers no longer has the need to transport heavy construction vehicles on these roadways.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
Upon acceptance, the City will incur certain maintenance responsibilities that are estimated to cost $6,075 annually. These estimated annual costs include: $825 for street sweeping; $600 for storm drain cleaning; $900 for routine striping and emergency roadway repairs; $1,650 for utilities (electric); and $2,100 for street lighting supplies and maintenance.

Funding for these annual maintenance costs is to be reimbursed by the County Service Area (CSA) M-29 assessment for Dougherty Valley.

The estimated total cost for the roadway improvements for Subdivision 9298 is $1,778,000.

5.6 Packet Pg. 71
ATTACHMENT:

A: Location Map Subd_9298
B: County Reso 2020-099
C: County Reso 2021-315

5.6 Packet Pg. 72
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-020

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON

ACCEPTING CERTAIN ROADWAY DEDICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS IN SUBDIVISION 9298 FOR MAINTENANCE (SHAPELL INDUSTRIES, INC./TOLL

BROTHERS)
WHEREAS, Subdivision 9298 is a re-subdivision of new Parcel A described in the Deed on DOC 2017-0232356; and
WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approved the Final Map for Subdivision 9298 on March 13, 2018, containing certain road improvement requirements for the subdivision acceptance; and
WHEREAS, the public improvements for Subdivision 9298 include approximately 2,429 feet of roadway, 22 streetlights, and 16 storm drain inlets/catch basins/manholes; and WHEREAS, these public improvements have been constructed and inspected consistent with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding dated October 15, 1997, between Contra Costa County, the City of San Ramon, Shapell Industries, Inc., and Windemere Ranch Partners; and
WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Public Works Department has determined, upon conferring with the City Engineer, that these public improvements have been completed by Shapell Industries, Inc./Toll Brothers as required and has recommended that the County Board of Supervisors accept these public improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2020/99 on March 31, 2020, which accepted the completion of public improvements for Subdivision 9298; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2021/293 on October 12, 2021, which accepted the completion of warranty period of the public improvements for Subdivision 9298; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has determined that the public improvements are now ready for acceptance by the City for maintenance; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Ramon is obligated by the Memorandum of Understanding to accept the public improvements for maintenance if the annexation process has been completed or initiated; and
WHEREAS, the annexation process for the area that contains Subdivision 9298 has been completed.

5.6 Packet Pg. 73
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the hereinafter described streets, as shown and offered for public use on the Final Map for Subdivision 9298 filed in Book 535 of Maps on Page 33, Official Records of Contra Costa County, State of California, are hereby accepted and declared to be City streets:

STREET R/W & C/C (ft) LENGTH (ft)
Goldfield Place 46 & 36 528
Trumpet Vine Lane 46 & 36 1,162
Arrowleaf Street 46 & 36 475
Woodshore Court 46 & 36 264

2. That the hereinafter described 5-foot-wide public utility easements, as shown and offered for public maintenance on the Final Map for Subdivision 9298 filed in Book 535 of Maps on Page 33 are hereby accepted:
a. Lots 101-112 and Lots 168-176 fronting Goldfield Place. b. Lots 113-138, Lots 139-153, Lots and 176-178 fronting Trumpet Vine Lane. c. Lots 153-156, Lot 167, and Lots 178-186 fronting Arrowleaf Street. d. Lots 156-167 fronting Woodshore Court.

3. That the hereinafter described sight distance easements, as shown and offered for public maintenance on the Final Map for Subdivision 9298 filed in Book 535 of Maps on Page 33 are hereby accepted:
a. Lots 101 and 168 at the intersection of Goldfield Place and Trefoil Road. b. Lot 176 at the intersection of Goldfield Place and Trumpet Vine Lane. c. Lots 153 and 178 at the intersection of Arrowleaf Street and Trumpet View Lane. d. Lots 156 and 167 at the intersection of Woodshore Court and Arrowleaf Street. e. Lot 186 at the intersection of Arrowleaf Street and Trefoil Road. f. Lot 139 at the intersection of Trefoil Road and Trumpet Vine Lane.

4. That the Relinquishment of Abutter’s Rights as shown on the Final Map for Subdivision 9298 are hereby accepted.

5. That the publicly dedicated roadway and storm drain improvements as shown on the plan entitled “Improvement Plans Subdivision 9298 Gale Ranch Phase 4” are hereby accepted.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at the meeting of February 8, 2022 by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

5.6 Packet Pg. 74
ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

David E. Hudson, Mayor
ATTEST:

Christina Franco, City Clerk

5.6 Packet Pg. 75

TRUMPET
V
NI E
LANE
G
O
L
D
FIE
L
D
P
LAC
E
G
O
L
D
F
EI L
D
P
LAC
E
D
O
U
G
H
E
R
T
Y
R
D

TRUMPET VINE LANE

TREFOIL ROAD
A
R
R
O
W
L
E
A
F
S
T
R
E
ET

SILVERCROWN WAY

WOODSHORE CO URT

LOCATION MAP

ATTACHMENT A

GALE RANCH

ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
SUBDIVISION 9298 2
SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT (TYP. 9 TOTAL)

TO BE ACCEPTED

RELINQUISHMENT OF ABUTTER'S
RIGHTS OF ACCESS ON LOT 101

TO BE ACCEPTED
Bella Vista
Elementary School
± PORTION OF ROADWAY TO BE ACCEPTED
1 SUBDIVISION 9298

BOUNDARY
2 PUBLIC UTILITY
EASEMENT (TYP.)
1 1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113 114
115
116 117 118 119 120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149 150
151
152 153
154
155
156 157 158 159
167 166 165 164 163 162 161 160
176 177 178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186 168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175

5.6.a
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: A: Location Map Subd_9298 (2022-020 : Acceptance of SD 9298)

THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 03/31/2020 by the following vote:

AYE:

NO:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

RECUSE:

Resolution No. 2020/99
IN THE MATTER OF: Accepting completion of improvements for subdivision SD12-09298 for a project developed by Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II) The Public Works Director has notified this Board that the improvements in subdivision SD12-09298 have been completed as provided in the Subdivision Agreement with Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, heretofore approved by this Board in conjunction with the filing of the Subdivision Map.

WHEREAS these improvements are approximately located near "new" Dougherty Road and Trefoil Road.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the improvements have been COMPLETED as of March 31, 2020, thereby establishing the six month terminal period for the filing of liens in case of action under said Subdivision Agreement:

DATE OF AGREEMENT: June 13, 2017
NAME OF SURETY: Hartford Fire Insurance Company
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the payment (labor and materials) surety for $887,000.00, Bond No. 39BSBHR0973 issued by the above surety be RETAINED for the six month lien guarantee period until September 30, 2020, at which time the Board AUTHORIZES the release of said surety less the amount of any claims on file.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Goldfield Place, Trumpet Vine Lane, Arrowleaf Street, and Woodshore Court for the hereinafter described public improvements, as shown and dedicated for public use on the Final Map of subdivision SD12-09298, filed , in Book 535 of final maps at Page 33 , Official Records of Contra Costa County, State of California, are ACCEPTED AS COMPLETE.

Road Name: Goldfield Place Length (miles): 0.10 Road/ROW Width: 36’/46’ Road Name: Trumpet Vine Lane Length (miles): 0.22 Road/ROW Width: 36’/46’ Road Name: Arrowleaf Street Length (miles): 0.09 Road/ROW Width: 36’/46’ Road Name: Woodshore Court Length (miles): 0.05 Road/ROW Width: 36’/46’ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon acceptance by the Board of Supervisors, the San Ramon City Council shall accept the improvements for maintenance and ownership in accordance with the Dougherty Valley Memorandum of Understanding.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval by the Board of Supervisors, the developer, Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, shall retain Parcel "A" for maintenance and ownership in accordance with the geologic hazard abatement district (GHAD) plan of control, and until accepted by the GHAD or the City of San Ramon.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that there is no warranty period required, and the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to refund the $18,000.00 cash security for performance (Auditor's Deposit Permit No. DP741185, dated July 17, 2017) plus interest in accordance with Government Code Section 53079, if appropriate, to Shapell Industries Inc., a Delaware Company pursuant to the requirements of the Ordinance Code; and the Subdivision Agreement and surety bond, Bond No 39BSBHR0973, dated June 13, 2017, issued by Hartford Fire Insurance Company are EXONERATED.

I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.

ATTACHMENT B

5.6.b
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: B: County Reso 2020-099 (2022-020 : Acceptance of SD 9298) Contact: Randolf Sanders (925)313-2111 ATTESTED: March 31, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy
cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Engineering Services, Joshua Laranang- Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Record, Cinda Tovar- Design & Construction, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Michael Mann- Finance, Jocelyn LaRocque- Maintenance, Chris Low - City of San Ramon, Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corp., Hartford Fire Insurance Company

5.6.b
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: B: County Reso 2020-099 (2022-020 : Acceptance of SD 9298)

ATTACHMENT C

5.6.c
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: C: County Reso 2021-315 (2022-020 : Acceptance of SD 9298)

5.6.c
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: C: County Reso 2021-315 (2022-020 : Acceptance of SD 9298)

5.6.c
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: C: County Reso 2021-315 (2022-020 : Acceptance of SD 9298)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 8, 2022
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Maria Fierner, Public Works Director
By: Prabhjot Dhoot, Transportation Specialist
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-021 - Designating Azalea Lane, Fuchsia Lane, Pearlgrass Lane, and Pearlgrass Court as Permanent Permit Parking Area “R” Under the City’s Residential Permit Parking Program, Restricting Parking Without a Valid Permit

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Residents from the Trevari Community requested that the City establish permit parking throughout their Community due to lack of parking available for the Trevari residents. The City received a petition signed by 92 percent of the residents in favor of implementing permit parking.

On January 12, 2021, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2021-021 implementing 12- month Temporary Permit Parking for the Trevari Community. The permit parking restriction has been in place from 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., seven days a week, and applies to four public roadways: Azalea Lane, Fuchsia Lane, Pearlgrass Lane, and Pearlgrass Court. The 12-month Temporary Permit Parking expired on January 31, 2022.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends approval of this Resolution designating Azalea Lane, Fuchsia Lane, Pearlgrass Lane, and Pearlgrass Court as Permanent Permit Parking Area “R” under the City’s Residential Permit Parking Program, Restricting Parking without a Valid Permit.

BACKGROUND
The Trevari Community is located west of Dougherty Road and north of Red Willow Road and consists of 84 single-family homes. The streets within the Trevari Community are public streets and include: Azalea Lane, Fuchsia Lane, Pearlgrass Lane, and Pearlgrass Court. A location map of the area is provided as Attachment A.

On August 10, 2020, residents of the Trevari Community (located north of Red Willow Road) requested that the City review parking issues within their neighborhood. The request stated that residents of the neighboring Miravilla Townhome Community (located south of Red Willow Road) were consistently parking within Trevari leaving no on-street parking for Trevari residents and visitors. Additionally, pedestrian safety concerns, garbage pick-up, and inability for street

9.1 Packet Pg. 82
sweeping were brought up as concerns resulting from parking issues.

At the January 12, 2021, City Council meeting, Council approved Resolution No. 2021-021 designating Azalea Lane, Fuchsia Lane, Pearlgrass Lane, and Pearlgrass Court as Temporary Parking Area “R” for a 12-Month Period under the City’s Residential Permit Parking Program, Restricting Parking without a Valid Permit. There were two additional items requiring follow-up:

1. Street Sweeping: During the public hearing portion of the City Council meeting, residents of Trevari stated that their roadways are not receiving street sweeping on a consistent basis due to the volume and constant demand for on-street parking. a. Response: City staff scheduled a dedicated street sweeping event on March 11, 2021. Going forward, the roadways within Trevari and Red Willow Road are cleaned as part of the City’s regular street sweeping program, on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month.

2. Fire Lanes: During the discussion, questions were raised regarding the roadway width of Azalea Lane between Red Willow Road and Pearlgrass Lane, and whether there is sufficient fire lane width adjacent to the on-street parking. a. Response: City staff met onsite with San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District staff to measure the roadway width and determined that there was insufficient width for a fire lane with on-street parking. Therefore, permanent “No Parking Fire Lane” signs were installed on June 7, 2021.

DISCUSSION
Since the commencement of the temporary Permit Parking on January 26, 2021, staff has conducted monthly observations to track parking occupancy. The results are shown in the table below and further detailed in Attachment B.

Parking
Occupancy
by Location
Total
Estimated
Spaces1
September
20202
January
20213
February
2021
March
2021
April
2021
May
2021
June
2021
November
2021
Trevari
Community
48 44 28 26 23 23 33 22 30
Miravilla
Community
96 41 36 39 25 30 33 27 36
Red Willow
Road
31 31 30 30 28 30 28 30 31
1 Number of spaces based on observations where all available curb was occupied or assuming approximately 20-25 feet where curb was available. 2 Before Temporary Permit Parking. 3 Temporary Permit Parking initiated.

As seen in the September 2020 observations, the on-street parking was nearly at capacity, and the unoccupied spaces were on the northernmost streets within Trevari. Once the Temporary Permit Parking was implemented, the number of occupied spaces throughout Trevari decreased from 93 percent occupancy to 57 percent and remains consistent. While there was not 100

9.1 Packet Pg. 83
percent occupancy prior to implementation of Temporary Permit Parking, occupancy is now at a level that is more in line with what would be expected. Trevari residents noted that their issues have been significantly reduced or eliminated with the implementation of the Temporary Permit Parking.

The Police Department (PD) has also tracked the number of citations issued since January 26, 2021. There were 15 citations issued the week of commencement, which has decreased to zero citations issued in the following months.

There has been positive feedback from both the Trevari HOA and PD for the Temporary Permit Parking.

Permit Parking - Municipal Code and General Plan
According to the City’s Municipal Code, Title B, Division B8, Chapter I, Article 2, permit parking areas may be established by a City Council resolution given that surveys or studies have been conducted to determine the need.

The City’s General Plan does currently limit Permit Parking to three areas:

1. Vicinity of California High School (CHS) - To reduce the impact of overflow parking by students into residential neighborhoods. The Permit Parking times and days vary by proximity to the school site, including:
a. 24 hours a day, seven days a week;
b. 7:00 a.m.to 7:00 p.m., seven days a week; or
c. 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.

2. Vicinity of Athan Downs Park - To reduce the impacts of overflow parking by patrons participating in sporting activities at Athan Downs Park. The Permit Parking hours are 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on Saturday.

3. Campton Community - To reduce the impacts of overflow parking from the neighboring townhome community. The Permit Parking hours are 4:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., seven days a week.

If the City Council were to approve converting the Trevari permit parking to permanent, the General Plan would need to be updated to reflect the new area. Modifications to the existing permit parking language are already scheduled to be made as part of the General Plan 2040 Update, and this would be included at that time.

The Municipal Code does not need to be updated as there is no inventory of zones in the Code.

Article 2, Chapter I, Division B8 of the Municipal Code lays out the criteria and procedures under which a permit parking zone may be established.

Due to the success of the Temporary Permit Parking in the Trevari Community, staff recommends converting the existing temporary Permit Parking to permanent Permit Parking.

9.1 Packet Pg. 84
Transportation Advisory Committee
On December 16, 2021, staff presented the Trevari Permit Parking proposal to the Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC). At the meeting, 10 Trevari residents spoke during public comment and requested that the temporary permit parking restriction become permanent, as it has significantly improved their quality of life, made it easier for guests to find parking, and reduced the stress associated with a high volume of parking in their neighborhood. TAC recommended that the temporary permit parking restriction be converted to permanent, and be brought forward to the City Council for consideration.

TAC members had the following comments - Monitor parking in the Alta Mira Community on the west side of Dougherty Road to ensure that there is no transfer of this parking issue to another neighborhood. It should be noted that TAC has not received any feedback from the Miravilla Community on their parking management, or the impacts of permit parking on their residents.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
The City does not require residents to pay for any aspect of the Permit Parking Program; therefore, all costs associated with research, installation, and enforcement are borne by the City of San Ramon.

The direct costs associated with the implementation of the temporary Permit Parking Program was $938 for the purchase of the roadside permit parking signs and resident/visitor vehicle stickers. If the temporary permit parking were to be converted to permanent, there will be no additional costs at this time, as the signs and permits are already in place.

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL

1. Develop and circulate a Frequently Asked Questions sheet with permit parking information.

2. Continue enforcement of Permit Parking Zone “R”, as needed.

3. Monitor and evaluate permit parking and update TAC in fall 2022.

ATTACHMENT:

A: Location Map of Trevari Community
B: Parking Occupancy Study Data
C: Parking Occupancy Study Map

9.1 Packet Pg. 85
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-021

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON

DESIGNATING AZALEA LANE, FUCHSIA LANE, PEARLGRASS LANE, AND PEARLGRASS COURT AS PERMANENT PERMIT PARKING AREA “R” UNDER THE CITY’S RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING PROGRAM, RESTRICTING

PARKING WITHOUT A VALID PERMIT
WHEREAS, Section 22507 of the California Vehicle Code authorizes the City of San Ramon to designate certain streets or portions thereof upon which permit parking privileges shall be given to residents adjacent to such streets; and
WHEREAS, Article 2, Chapter I, Division B8 of the Municipal Code of the City of San Ramon sets the objective criteria for, and authorizes, the establishment of permit parking areas within the City of San Ramon in order to alleviate motor vehicle congestion caused by short- and long-term non-residential parking in certain areas and neighborhoods: to protect the health, safety and welfare of residents of these areas and to promote the integrity of these areas; and WHEREAS, data from engineering surveys and observations indicate that it is the desire and need by the residents of the proposed permit parking areas to install permit parking in front of their homes; and
WHEREAS, data from engineering surveys and observations indicate that the legal onstreet parking spaces are fully or nearly fully occupied by motor vehicles during the period proposed for restricted parking; and
WHEREAS, data from engineering surveys and observations indicate that the majority of vehicles parking in the on-street spaces from 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., seven days a week, belong to non-residents; and
WHEREAS, data from engineering surveys and observations indicate that the number of parking spaces available within the Miravilla Community are sufficient to accommodate the displaced non-resident vehicles from the Trevari Community; and WHEREAS, data from observations indicate that there will be sufficient on-street parking available to Trevari residents with the proposed Permit Parking Program; and WHEREAS, data from observations have indicated the need for such permanent permit parking within the Trevari Community; and
WHEREAS, the City circulated an online Permit Parking Petition to the 84 households within the Trevari Community to determine support for Permit Parking, with 92 percent of the Trevari residents in support of the permit parking proposal; and WHEREAS, on January 12, 2021, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2021-021

9.1 Packet Pg. 86
designating Azalea Lane, Fuchsia Lane, Pearlgrass Lane, and Pearlgrass Court as Temporary Permit Parking area “R” for a 12-Month Period under the City’s Residential Permit Parking Program, Restricting Parking Without a Valid Permit; and WHEREAS, since the commencement of the Temporary Permit Parking on January 26, 2021, staff has conducted monthly observations to track parking occupancy and the number of occupied spaces throughout Trevari decreased from 93 percent occupancy to 57 percent, and remains consistent; and
WHEREAS, Trevari residents noted that their issues have been significantly reduced or eliminated with the implementation of the Temporary Permit Parking; and WHEREAS, the number of citations issued by the San Ramon Police Department since January 26, 2021, were 15 citations issued the week of commencement, which has decreased to zero citations; and
WHEREAS, on December 16, 2021, the Transportation Advisory Committee recommended the establishment of permanent Permit Parking for the Trevari Community by a 5- 1 vote.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Azalea Lane, Fuchsia Lane, Pearlgrass Lane, and Pearlgrass Court are designated as permanent Permit Parking Area “R” and that parking of vehicles on these roadways without a valid permit issued pursuant to Article 2, Chapter I, Division B8 of the San Ramon Municipal Code is prohibited between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., seven days a week, except on holidays, inclusive effective February 9, 2022.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the meeting of February 8, 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________________
David E. Hudson, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Christina Franco, City Clerk

9.1 Packet Pg. 87
221
223
433
110
218
207
211
209
111
112
217
317
215
131
219
101
205
419
411
201
316
126
302
119
427
100
414
417
117
311
415
121
425
123
416
421
309
206
108
315
401
423
125
422
103
210
127
214
129
432
409
114
428
426
105
115
431
307
208
120
418
216
405
420
203
310
314
312
104
407
106
424
308
118
116
403
212
102
429
304
430
306
122
124

RED WILLOW RD

FUSCHIA LN

DOUGHERTY RD

AZALEA LN

CROW CANYON RD

PEARL GRASS CT

BELLFLOWER DR

REGAL LILY LN

PEARL GRASS LN

LARKSPUR LN

SASSAFRAS LN

PERMIT PARKING ZONES CITY OF SAN RAMON
7000 Bollinger Canyon Rd, San Ramon, CA 94583
ENGINEERING SERVICES ±

ATTACHMENT A
7 Days a Week 7PM-7AM

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: A: Location Map of Trevari Community (2022-021 : Trevari Permit Parking)

ATTACHMENT B

9.1.b
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: B: Parking Occupancy Study Data (2022-021 : Trevari Permit Parking)

9.1.b
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: B: Parking Occupancy Study Data (2022-021 : Trevari Permit Parking) Permit Parking Observations Zone Map
Zone 1: Red Willow Road (Fuchsia Lane to Azalea Lane)
Zone 2: Azalea Lane (entry only)
Zone 3: Pearlgrass Lane and Court (east of Azalea Lane) Zone 4: Azalea Lane (north of Pearlgrass Lane)
Zone 5: Pearlgrass Lane (Fuchsia Lane to Azalea Lane)
Zone 6: Fuchsia Lane (north of Pearlgrass Lane)
Zone 7: Fuchsia Lane (Pearlgrass Lane to Red Willow Road) Zone 8: Miravilla Community Parking

9.1.c
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: C: Parking Occupancy Study Map (2022-021 : Trevari Permit Parking)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 8, 2022
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Debbie Chamberlain, Community Development Director By: Lauren Barr, Division Manager
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-022 - Adopting the San Ramon Walking District Plan Guidelines

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines (the Plan) provides the long-term vision for pedestrian-oriented access and connectivity within the City Core. The creation of a San Ramon Walking District in San Ramon’s City Core originated from a grassroots effort of a group of citizens to promote a more pedestrian-centric community. The Plan expands the initial focus area envisioned by the citizen group to include the downtown area between Bollinger Canyon Road and Crow Canyon Road with Alcosta Boulevard bounding it to the east and the freeway to the west. This area is referred to as the “City Core.” The Plan maps the area’s existing infrastructure that either supports or deters walking, builds upon improvements proposed by a combination of public and private development, and establishes a set of guidelines and project recommendations to move the vision for a Walking District toward implementation. It dovetails with the Parks, Trails, Open Space and Recreation Master Plan, and aligns and coordinates with the City’s Bicycle Master Plan, the Iron Horse Trail Bicycle Pedestrian Corridor Concept Plan, and Bishop Ranch’s CityWalk Master Plan.

Walkability creates a sense of place and is a key component for how some people define quality of life. In addition to being an amenity for community members to visit and use, the planned housing within the City Core makes it an identifiable district that draws people who desire a walkable lifestyle.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council a Resolution adopting the Walking District Plan with changes made to address the feedback from the Planning Commission and Parks & Community Services Commission.

10.1 Packet Pg. 92

BACKGROUND
City Council priorities for FY 2019-20 included, among others things, the prioritization of housing growth in the City Core while preserving existing retail, commercial, and open space.

Goal (6b) is specifically to “Explore the development of a walking district with community partners that would support the emphasis on housing in the City Core.” This priority aligned with input received from the community prior to and during the update of the City’s Parks, Trail, Open Space and Recreation Master Plan (Parks Master Plan). Opportunity 1.3 of the Parks Master Plan states “Develop a Framework Plan for a Walking District near the City Center” and was identified as a high priority project to be completed in the short-term (0-5 years) after the Parks Master Plan completion.

The purpose of the Walking District Plan was to continue stakeholder collaboration and develop a framework plan that summarizes the vision and provides goals and guidelines for walking corridors and loops and presents branding options that can be carried forward by the City as part of signage, mapping, marketing, and programming efforts. The Walking District Plan responds to the vision and goals set by the grassroots Walking District citizen committee prior to and during the Parks Master Plan process and provides the long-term vision for pedestrian-oriented access and connectivity. These short-term and long-range goals included:

Short-Term Goals (from Grassroots Walking District Citizen Committee’s 3/13/2019 PowerPoint Presentation)
• Continue collaboration with stakeholders
• Execute brand and marketing strategy
• Establish official WD and WD Loop map
• Create & implement way-signage, signs, trail markings • Ongoing awareness
Long-Range Goals (from Grassroots Walking District Citizen Committee’s 3/13/2019 PowerPoint Presentation)
• Work with City on future walking segments
• Create walking programs throughout the City
• Continue promoting San Ramon as a healthy community and desirable tourist location In addition to the focus on pedestrian access and connectivity within the City Core, the Walking District Plan guidelines promote healthy community initiatives, connectivity to other community trails (Iron Horse Trail, Bicycle Master Plan, etc.), amenities, points of interest, connections to schools and neighborhoods. The Plan promotes wayfinding through technology and signage, enhance pedestrian experiences, a positive community image, and supports economic development within the community moving forward.

The Walking District Plan dovetails and aligns with the Parks, Trails, Open Space and Recreation Master Plan, and coordinate with the City’s Bicycle Master Plan, the Iron Horse Trail Bicycle Pedestrian Corridor Concept Plan, Bishop Ranch’s CityWalk Master Plan and Design Guidelines, and other development projects that had been submitted to the City for approval during creation of the Walking District Plan.

10.1 Packet Pg. 93

DISCUSSION/ANALYSIS
Process
City staff from the Planning Services Department and Parks and Community Services Department worked together with the planning consultant to develop the Walking District Plan.

The consultant and staff conducted virtual stakeholder interviews with four groups to better understand the existing conditions, issues, available information, and vision for the Walking District from each group’s perspective. The following entities were invited to participate in the four groups of interviews:
 City Engineering, Transportation, Traffic, and Police Department Staff  Contra Costa County and East Bay Regional Park District Staff  Walking District Committee Members
 Major Private Property Owners
After conducting small group interviews, the consultant and City staff convened a virtual work session with the Walking District Committee members and private property and landholder representatives. The purpose of the work session was to align the goals and vision described by the different entities; confirm destinations, gaps, and routes; and gather an initial direction for placemaking and branding. The work session was conducted via Zoom with co-facilitators from Design Workshop using Mural Boards to capture information and get comments on maps in real time. Participants from both the Walking District Committee and private property owners participated. Following the Stakeholder meeting, a public webinar was hosted to broaden the input received on project goals, opportunities, and vision.

The second round of stakeholder meetings and public webinar occurred during May 2021.

Stakeholders and the public were invited to review the draft recommendations for Walking District guidelines and review the framework for the system of pathways, walking loops, amenities, and wayfinding strategies. Upon feedback from stakeholders and the greater community, the consultant worked with the City to generate a draft of the Walking District Plan and potential branding logos. The draft plan was reviewed by City staff from Planning, Parks & Community Services, Engineering, Transportation, and Traffic, and is consistent with the recommendations for the Iron Horse Trail described in the County’s 2020 Iron Horse Corridor Active Transportation Study.

The Following is a summary of the outreach meetings that occurred:
• Four Focus Group Interviews
• Stakeholder Virtual Meeting #1
• Public Webinar #1
• Stakeholder Virtual Meeting #2
• City and Partner Agency Staff Meeting
• Public Webinar #2
• Stakeholder Virtual Meeting #3
• Stakeholder Virtual Meeting #4

10.1 Packet Pg. 94
The draft plan, including the vision, goals, guidelines, maps, sections, and branding logos, were presented to the stakeholders for review and discussion. During the review meeting, the consultant team received the following general comments:
• Reinforce the benefits and design objectives of the Walking District and Proposed Framework
• Reinforce opportunities for walkways to be curvilinear where site constraints and design intention allow
• Graphic clarity for Proposed Framework Map & Sections • Confirm consistency with approved documents and projects (e.g., Bicycle Master Plan, Iron Horse Trail Corridor Active Transportation Study, and CityWalk Master Plan and Design Guidelines)
The above comments were addressed in a revised draft plan and revisions were presented and reviewed by the stakeholders and the stakeholders recommended moving the revised draft Walking District Plan forward to the Planning Commission and Parks & Community Services Commission for further feedback and consideration by the Commission and the greater public.

The Draft Walking District Plan was then posted to the City’s website November 19, 2021.

The Draft Walking District Plan was presented to the Planning Commission (PC) on December 7, 2021 and to the Parks & Community Services Commission (PCSC) on December 8, 2021. PC and PCSC provided comments for City Council to consider. The theme of comments from both Commission meetings was similar and is summarized below.

Themes of Comments from Planning Commission and Parks & Community Services Commission Meetings
 Overall support expressed for the plan, the process, the vision, and the branding/logo developed
 Provide additional information and strengthen the chapter on implementation o Which City Department will be responsible for overall management of the Plan o Annually update City Council on progress to keep the Plan top of mind as funding and goal setting is prioritized
o Expand the discussion of funding opportunities
o Provide cost estimates for project opportunities
 Consider opportunities to be bolder and further enhance the Plan’s recommendations o Align walkways on the “interior” of residential areas and have more meandering paths (i.e., make it beautiful and interesting)
o Provide additional loops and extend the project area to the east o Describe maintenance standards for non-paved systems to ensure DG pathways will have a compact, walkable surface for those with mobility issues o Make Camino Ramon a “Slow Street” that can be closed for events or longer periods of time and be pedestrian-centric, not auto-focused o Provide additional signage
 Focus the public art program on having art placed in the Walking District rather than across the city at indiscriminate locations to bring more value to the program and concentrate art in the Walking District and other areas of the city

10.1 Packet Pg. 95
 Consider making the plan more prescriptive or create incentives that encourage private developers to implement the vision (e.g., providing open space credits when Walking District amenities are included in development projects) Discussion and comments from the Commissioners were reviewed by City staff and the Consultant. Subsequent revisions were made to the Implementation Chapter as noted in the attached Errata document dated January 2022.

Plan Overview and Primary Themes
The Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, and Guidelines confirms the vision and goals for the Walking District and sets forth a set of guidelines through which that vision can be achieved.

The development of the plan was a City-led effort with significant input from stakeholders who would be looked to for partnerships to achieve the Plan’s vision.

Walkability refers to the degree to which a place encourages walking as a primary means to move from place to place. Walkable places do not just happen. They are the product of thoughtful planning and design. The Walking District Plan includes the following elements:

Vision
Promote a pedestrian-centric community
Goals

1. Create a comfortable place for people to walk and bike in San Ramon’s City Core

2. Identify walking and biking loops and routes

3. Connect civic, recreation, and commercial destinations

4. Enhance wayfinding

5. Provide a long-term vision for pedestrian oriented access and connectivity

6. Improve connectivity and establish a sense of place for those living within the area now and in the future
Best Practices and Principles for the Walking District
• Provide a Reason to Walk
• Be Safe
• Be Comfortable
• Be Interesting (includes opportunities for programming, activities, and incorporating curvilinear trail alignments where appropriate)
Walking System Components
Best practices and guidelines for “Walking Corridors” are described. The Walking Corridors include sidewalks, landscape with shade trees, and amenity areas. Where possible, it is desirable for walkways to be located away from the edge of the roadway, provide shade, and be inviting and have a park-like feel. Components of the system framework include:
• Iron Horse Regional Trail
• CityWalk Parkways
• Primary Connectors

10.1 Packet Pg. 96
• Secondary Connectors
• Primary Recreation Paths
• Secondary Recreation Paths
For each system component, a set of guidelines and section are provided. Example sections illustrating existing and proposed conditions and describing the benefits of applying the guidelines and identifying the walking corridor are included.

Branding and Logo Options and Wayfinding
Through the process, the brand “Walk San Ramon” was generated. This brand applies to both the Walking District study area and the greater city as a whole. Three logo concepts were developed along with examples of how to incorporate the brand into a mobile app and integrate and layer the logo with other signage throughout the project area. The system of pedestrian wayfinding signage is mapped and examples of sign types provided.

Walking Loops, Routes, and Supporting Amenities
A series of organized walking loops or routes were developed. The loops link major destinations and can be mixed and layered by individuals as desired to encourage exploration of the entire area. These routes can be incorporated by the City as part of community services programming and marketing efforts to encourage walking. Recommendations for supporting amenities, including public art, seating, drinking fountains, and restrooms are described and opportunity areas for the amenities are mapped. It is recognized that final locations of the amenities and public art may vary and will be added as specific opportunities arise.

Implementation
Implementation of the Plan’s vision will be a shared responsibility, with Planning and the Parks & Community Services departments having different areas of focus. Planning is responsible for reviewing applications and working with applicants to align project outcomes with the vision described in the Walking District Plan where feasible. Parks & Community Services will lead implementation of opportunities such as signage and branding, programming walking events, promoting the Walking District, and incorporating arts and cultural programming. PCS also oversees recommended connections to City-owned park facilities, such as Central Park.

The Implementation Chapter provides a summary of project opportunities than may be led by the City, those that may be partnerships with other agencies, public-private partnership opportunities, and projects that occur through reinvestment and redevelopment of private properties by individual property owners. It is recognized that the majority of the project area is outside of the City’s ownership. The public right-of-away alone is not enough to implement the desired changes to enhance walkability. The Walking District Plan represents a vision for infrastructure improvement and that final design and implementation of enhancements may vary as individual projects are proposed and project details are developed.

Potential funding sources that support pedestrian and urban greening projects are provided.

Planning and Parks & Community Services will provide annual progress updates on implementation of the Walking District vision as part of the General Plan Annual Report.

10.1 Packet Pg. 97
Summary
The Walking District Plan advances walkability and sets for the goals and guidelines through which a safe, comfortable, and interesting pedestrian realm can be established. Private property owners and stakeholders support the vision and have expressed strong desires to see it implemented through both public and private projects. As the City continues forward, both Planning and the Parks & Community Services Department will annually track and report progress.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
None at this time.

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL

1. Continue to pursue opportunities as they present themselves.

2. Planning and Parks & Community Services will provide annual progress updates on implementation.

ATTACHMENT:

A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 B: San Ramon Walking District Plan Errata, January 2022

10.1 Packet Pg. 98
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-022

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON

ADOPTING THE SAN RAMON WALKING DISTRICT PLAN GUIDELINES WHEREAS, the San Ramon Walking District in San Ramon’s City Core originated from a grassroots effort of a group of citizens to promote a more pedestrian-centric community; and WHEREAS, City Council priorities for FY 2019-20 included, among others things, provided direction to “Explore the development of a walking district with community partners that would support the emphasis on housing in the City Core”; and WHEREAS, the City entered into a contract with Design Workshop to conduct public engagement and prepare a Walking District Plan Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the consultant and staff conducted public outreach, virtual stakeholder interviews and a virtual work sessions with stakeholders including interested parties, the Walking District Committee members, and private property owners within the District area; and WHEREAS, the Walking District Plan’s Vision, Goals, & Guidelines provides a longterm vision for pedestrian-oriented access and connectivity within the City Core.

WHEREAS, in addition to the focus on pedestrian access and connectivity within the City Core, the Walking District Plan guidelines promote walkability, healthy community initiatives, connectivity to other community trails (Iron Horse Trail, Bicycle Master Plan, etc.), amenities, points of interest, connections to schools and neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, walkability creates a sense of place and a Walking District is an amenity for community members to visit and use; and
WHEREAS, the Walking District Plan also promotes wayfinding through technology and signage, enhance pedestrian experiences, a positive community image, and supports economic development within the community; and
WHEREAS, the Walking District relies on a combination of public and private development, and establishes a set of guidelines and project recommendations to move the vision for a Walking District toward implementation; and
WHEREAS, private property owners and stakeholders support the vision and have expressed a desires to see it implemented through both public and private projects; and WHEREAS, the Draft Walking District Plan was presented to the Planning Commission (PC) on December 7, 2021 and to the Parks & Community Services Commission (PCSC) on December 8, 2021; and

10.1 Packet Pg. 99
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and Parks & Community Services Commission comments, which have been incorporated into the Walking District Plan, have been summarized in the presentation to City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Ramon does hereby adopt the Walking District Plan Guidelines.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the meeting of February 8, 2022 by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________
Dave Hudson, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Christina Franco, City Clerk

10.1 Packet Pg. 100

SAN RAMON

WALKING DISTRICT PLAN

VISION, GOALS, & GUIDELINES
Prepared for the City of San Ramon
January 2022

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Tree-lined walkway in Central Park by City Hall

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 DOCUMENT PURPOSE2
WHY A WALKING DISTRICT3
SAN RAMON TODAY5
STAKEHOLDER & PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT6
EXISTING POLICIES, STANDARDS, PLANS & PROJECTS8
DESTINATIONS 10
PEDESTRIAN NETWORK 12
BICYCLE NETWORK 14
TRANSIT SYSTEM 16
WALKING DISTRICT GOALS & GUIDELINES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 VISION & GOALS 20
WALKABILITY BEST PRACTICES 21
WALKING SYSTEM COMPONENTS 28
GUIDELINES 30
PROPOSED WALKING LOOPS 60
PROPOSED SUPPORTING AMENITIES 62
WAYFINDING 64
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 IMPLEMENTATION ROLES 72
IMPLEMENTATION OPPORTUNITIES 74

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Pedestrian Crossing near City Center

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1: WALKING DISTRICT PROJECT AREA AND SURROUNDING CONTEXT 2 FIGURE 2: 2019 PRESENTATION SLIDES FROM CITIZENS GROUP WHO FORGED THE EFFORT 3 FIGURE 3: SAN RAMON’S 2021 WALK SCORE 4
FIGURE 4: SAN RAMON TAPESTRY SEGMENTS PER ESRI BUSINESS ANALYST, JUNE 27, 2021. 5 FIGURE 5: RESULTS OF INTERACTIVE POLLING QUESTIONS FROM PUBLIC WEBINAR #1 6 FIGURE 7: STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK ON INTERACTIVE MAP IN STAKEHOLDER WORK SESSION #2 7 FIGURE 6: RESULTS OF INTERACTIVE POLLING QUESTIONS FROM PUBLIC WEBINAR #2 7 FIGURE 8: SPECIFIC PLANS, MASTER PLANS, AND PROJECTS IN PLANNING PHASES WITHIN THE STUDY AREA 8 FIGURE 9: CITY STREET SECTION FROM CITY OF SAN RAMON ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS 8 FIGURE 10: PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION DIAGRAM 9
FIGURE 11: EXISTING AND PLANNED DESTINATIONS AND “GEMS” 11 FIGURE 12: EXISTING AND PLANNED PEDESTRIAN NETWORK 13
FIGURE 13: EXISTING AND PLANNED BICYCLE NETWORK 15
FIGURE 14: EXISTING AND PLANNED TRANSIT SYSTEM 17
FIGURE 15: PROPOSED WALKING SYSTEM CLASSIFICATIONS 29
FIGURE 16: IRON HORSE TRAIL PROPOSED SECTION IMPROVEMENTS 30 FIGURE 17: IRON HORSE TRAIL PROPOSED PLAN IMPROVEMENTS 32 FIGURE 18: EXISTING IMAGE OF EAST/WEST CONNECTION TO THE IRON HORSE TRAIL 34 FIGURE 19: RENDERING OF REPRESENTATIVE ENHANCED EAST/WEST CONNECTION TO THE IRON HORSE TRAIL 35 FIGURE 20: EXISTING IMAGE OF IRON HORSE TRAIL CORRIDOR 36 FIGURE 21: RENDERING OF REPRESENTATIVE ENHANCED IRON HORSE TRAIL CORRIDOR WITH SHADE AND SEATING 37 FIGURE 22: PROPOSED PARKWAYS SECTION ALONG CAMINO RAMON 38 FIGURE 23: PROPOSED PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN CONNECTORS SECTION 44 FIGURE 24: PROPOSED SECONDARY PEDESTRIAN CONNECTORS SECTION 50 FIGURE 25: PROPOSED PRIMARY RECREATION PATHS SECTION 54 FIGURE 26: PROPOSED SECONDARY RECREATION PATHS SECTION 56 FIGURE 27: PROPOSED WALKING LOOPS 59
FIGURE 28: PROPOSED SUPPORTING AMENITIES 61
FIGURE 29: LOGO CONCEPT 1 62
FIGURE 30: LOGO CONCEPT 2 62
FIGURE 31: LOGO CONCEPT 3 62
FIGURE 32: LOGO CONCEPT 4 62
FIGURE 33: PROPOSED COLOR PALETTE, FONTS, AND REPRESENTATIVE DIGITAL APP 63 FIGURE 34: PROPOSED SIGNAGE LOCATIONS 65
FIGURE 35: GENERAL PRIVATE/PUBLIC OWNERSHIP DESIGNATIONS 71 FIGURE 36: WEBINAR POLLING FEEDBACK FROM THE PUBLIC ON RANKING POTENTIAL PROJECTS 72 FIGURE 37: WEBINAR POLLING FEEDBACK FROM THE PUBLIC ON RANKING POTENTIAL PROJECTS 75

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
1 The creation of a San Ramon Walking District in San Ramon’s City Core originated from a grassroots effort of a group of citizens to promote a more pedestrian-centric community.

Introduction &
Background

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
2 | Introduction & Background

ALCOSTA BLVD

CAMINO RAMON
Iron Horse Trail

CROW CANYON ROAD

NORRIS CANYON ROAD

EXECUTIVE PARKWAY

BOLLINGER CANYON ROAD
I-680
N
Figure 1: Walking District Project Area and Surrounding Context

DOCUMENT PURPOSE
Community members
identified developing
a Walking District as
a top priority in the
Parks, Trails, Open
Space & Recreation
Master Plan
Purpose
A vision for a Walking District in San Ramon’s City Core came from a grassroots effort by local residents who
recognized the opportunities and benefits of promoting
a more pedestrian-centric community with a focus on
identifying loops to connect community resources and
destinations within the City Core. Their work inspired the City Council to set as one of their priorities in the 2019- 2020 fiscal year to “Explore the development of a walking district with community partners that would support the emphasis on housing in the City Core.”
This Walking District Plan (the Plan) provides the long-term vision for pedestrian-oriented access and connectivity
within the City Core. It expands the initial focus area envisioned by the citizen group to include the downtown area between Bollinger Canyon Road and Crow Canyon
Road with Alcosta Boulevard bounding it to the east and the freeway to the west. This area is referred to as the “City Core”. The Plan reviews the area’s existing infrastructure that either supports or deters walking, builds upon
improvements proposed by a combination of public and
private development, and establishes a set of guidelines and project recommendations to move the vision for a
Walking District toward implementation.

Walkability creates a sense of place and is a key
component for how some people define quality of life. In addition to being an amenity for community members
to visit and use, the planned housing within the City Core makes it an identifiable district that draws people who desire a walking lifestyle.

Connection Opportunities
Walkable places have a variety of community destinations within a concentrated area and may also provide
interesting and scenic experiences. The project area
stands apart as an opportunity for San Ramon because it houses a concentration of community amenities and uses.

Points of interest and community destinations located
within the project area include:
• City Hall
• Library
• Central Park
• Bishop Ranch lakes
and fountains
• City Center
• Iron Horse Trail
• Story Walk
• Post Office
• Dining and retail
areas
• Offices and
workplaces
• Iron Horse Middle
School
• San Ramon Transit
Center

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Introduction & Background | 3
Who We Are
A San Ramon Citizens Group
leading the way in promoting
a more pedestrian‐centric
community
Walking is gaining popularity
across the US. Multiple
studies suggest walkable
communities are associated
with:
• Better health
• Happier residents
• Increased sense of community • Overall better quality of life • Increased economic activity
The Walking
District
Loop
Figure 2: 2019 Presentation Slides from Citizens Group Who Forged the Effort

WHY A WALKING DISTRICT
Benefits of Walking and Walkability
A 2015 American Planning Association report “The
Benefits of Street-Scale Features for Walking and Biking” supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
through the Active Living Research program documents
the following six benefits of physical environments that encourage walking. In addition to improved air quality
and water quality from reduced vehicular use, policies and infrastructure that promote walking and biking can result in the below benefits for San Ramon.
• Physical Activity: Increased levels of physical activity and improved physical health (reduced obesity,
diabetes, and cardiovascular disease)
• Social Interaction: Increased levels of social
connections, which can in turn increase sense of
community and shared cultural identity
• Crime Prevention and Public Safety: Reductions in
actual property and violent crime and perceptions of
crime
• Multimodal Traffic Safety: Reduction in frequency
and/or severity of crashes or injuries to pedestrians,
bicyclists, and motorists
• Mental Health: Improvements in stress, anxiety,
depression, energy levels, sleep quality, and fear of
crime
• Economic: Increased consumer spending, return on
investment, job creation, and bike and foot traffic for local businesses
The above graphic with project area and route are the work of the grassroots group. This work was referenced and incorporated as part of this Plan.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
4 | Introduction & Background

SAN RAMON TODAY
Walkability
According to Walk Score, a patented system to convey
walkability, San Ramon is a car-dependent city. The low walkability score is a reflection of the city’s history as a local- and regional-serving suburban office center
with surrounding low- to medium-density residential
neighborhoods and supporting services. Although
sidewalks are provided in most locations and a regional shared-use path (the Iron Horse Trail) connects the city north to south, the distances between land uses and
limited east-west shared use path connections discourage walking to destinations.

Methodology
Walk Score measures walkability on a scale from 0 - 100 based on walking routes to destinations such as grocery stores, schools, parks, restaurants, and retail. It provides a large scale snapshot that characterizes how easy or
challenging it is to navigate a city by foot or bike.

Walk Score measures walkability by analyzing hundreds
of walking routes to nearby amenities. Points are awarded based on the distance to amenities in each category.

Amenities within a 5 minute walk (.25 miles) are given
maximum points. A decay function is used to give points to more distant amenities, with no points given after a 30 minute walk.

Walk Score also measures pedestrian friendliness by
analyzing population density and road metrics such as
block length and intersection density. Data sources include Google, Factual, Great Schools, Open Street Map, the U.S.

Census, Localeze, and places added by the Walk Score
user community. The guidelines in this Plan would move
the City toward improving the score by improving the
walking routes to many community destinations.

Figure 3: San Ramon’s 2021 Walk Score
View of Bollinger Canyon Road looking east, one of San Ramon’s arterial roads.

WALK SCORE
24 According to Walk
Score, San Ramon is
a car-dependent city.

Almost all errands
require a car.

The guidelines in this
Plan would move
the City toward
improving the score
by improving the
walking routes to
many community
destinations.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Introduction & Background | 5

SAN RAMON TODAY
A Community that Values Fitness
Tapestry Segmentation provides a description of communities and neighborhoods based on socioeconomic and
demographic compositions. Segmentation is derived by using data sources including Census 2020, the American Community Survey (ACS), Esri demographic updates and consumer
surveys such as the Survey of the American Consumer from MRI-Simmons and organized into 67 distinct groups.

San Ramon’s top three tapestry segments (listed and
described below) reflect a community that values physical fitness and access to technology. These characteristics support the Plan’s proposed development of walking loops and
amenities that provide for both social connection, exercise, and enjoying the outdoors are desirable. The Segmentation also suggests success with utilizing technology to
communicate information about walking loops and interactive displays.

Tapestry Segment Descriptions
• Enterprising Professionals
• Well educated and climbing the ladder in STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) occupations
• Early adopters of new technology
• Use smartphones for news, accessing search engines,
and maps
• Strive to stay youthful and healthy, eat organic and
natural foods, run and do yoga
• Boomburbs
• Young professionals with families that have opted to
trade up to the newest housing in the suburbs
• Residents are well-educated professionals with a
running start on prosperity
• Well connected, own the latest devices and understand how to use them efficiently
• Physical fitness is a priority, including club memberships and home equipment
• Leisure includes a range of activities from sports (hiking, bicycling, swimming, golf) to visits to theme parks or
water parks
• Residents are generous supporters of charitable
organizations
• Savvy Suburbanites
• Well educated, well read, and well capitalized. Families include empty nesters and almost empty nesters, who
still have adult children at home
• Well-connected consumers that appreciate technology
and make liberal use of it for everything from shopping and banking to staying current and communicating
• Physically fit, residents actively pursue a number of sports, from skiing to golf, and invest heavily in sports gear and exercise equipment Figure 4: San Ramon Tapestry Segments per Esri Business Analyst, June 27, 2021. The infographics contains data
provided by Esri, Esri and Data Axle, Esri and Infogroup and is based on available census data.

Other Race 2.32 -9.27
Two or More Races 5.96 -0.82
Hispanic Origin (Any Race) 9.27 -16.98
Bars show deviation from Contra Costa County
PETS
40%
Household
Owns a Dog
20%
Household
Owns a Cat
53%
Household
Owns Any Pet
San Ramon City, CA
2 Total Population 81,533
Total Daytime Population 96,188
Average Household Size 2.88
Median Age 38.0
Median Household Income 161,188
Tapestry Segments
2D Enterprising
Professionals
9,316 households

32.9%
of Households
1C Boomburbs
5,530 households

19.5%
of Households
1D Savvy Suburbanites
4,878 households

17.2%
of Households
Name
Address
City, Zip and State
Phone
Email
This infographic contains data provided by Esri. The vintage of the data is 2020. © 2021 Esri Source: This infographic contains data provided by Esri, Esri and GfK MRI. The vintage of the data is 2020.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
6 | Introduction & Background
Building from the Citizen-Driven Effort
Stakeholder and public engagement for the Walking
District Plan began with a series of four small group
interviews with representatives from the City, Contra
Costa County, East Bay Regional Parks District, the former Walking District Committee, and private property owners or tenants. Following the series of small group discussions to better understand different perspectives on the needs, challenges, and opportunities for the project study
area, representatives were brought together in a virtual working session to share ideas on goals and potential
improvements to encourage walking and biking in the
project area.

After the stakeholder work session, a virtual public
webinar was hosted to engage the broader public and
solicit ideas and feedback on project goals and potential recommendations.

A second round of virtual meetings (stakeholder work
session and public webinar) was conducted after the
development of initial guidelines and walking loops
were established. Stakeholder and public input was then incorporated to refine the plan recommendations.

STAKEHOLDER & PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
What improvements do you think are most important to
encourage or create a more inviting walking or biking
environment?
Increased Shade
4 Wayfinding and Signage
12 14 13
Wider Walkways
Separated Bike Facilities Designated LJoops
or Routes
BuffeJ Walkways from
Roadways
A Variety of Different
Experiences Along the
Way
11 -. - 5
Lighting Improve Crosswalks
1 Other
•
-
5 Seating Areas
Figure 5: Results of Interactive Polling Questions from Public Webinar #1 What improvements do you think are most important to
encourage or create a more inviting walking or biking
environment?
What are the “gems” and key destinations of the Walking District?

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Introduction & Background | 7

STAKEHOLDER & PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT
Figure 6: Results of Interactive Polling Questions from Public Webinar #2 Figure 7: Stakeholder Feedback on Interactive Map in Stakeholder Work Session #2 Rank the potential City and City/Other Public Entities projects in order of importance (1 most important to 5 least important)
Rank the potential Public and Partnership and New/RedevelopmentDriven projects in order of importance (1 most important to 5 least important)

1. Change to Parkway (orange) to extend 8’ shared use path to north

2. Slightly meander/curved path

3. Use Inverness Park green belt as inspiration; but needs to not impact site plan

4. Provide sections along each portion of Camino Ramon to illustrate how existing features change

5. Enhance connection

6. Change to recreation path route, not “connector”

7. Move parkway here (not along Bollinger Canyon Road)

8. Recognize where landscape/hardscape improvements could block sight lines at intersections

9. Enhance crossing from Iron Horse Trail to Bishop Ranch property

10. Layer in Bicycle Master Plan recommendations

11. Overcrossing will extend to here

12. Provide site level improvements into Marketplace

13. Tie into retail businesses as an amenity

14. Consider crosswalk conditions and visibility
Stakeholder Feedback
Enhance IHT connection from adjacent
areas (e.g. Central Park)
Enhance IHT by widening and separating
“rolling” uses from “walking and running”
uses
Separate walkways from road (With
New Development as Conditions
Allow)
Widen walkways (With New
Development as Conditions Allow)
Provide wayfinding signage
(Public/Private Partnership)
Provide public art (Public/
Private Partnership)
Provide shade along IHT
Provide seating along IHT
Provide additional seating in Central Park
near the Iron Horse Trail (IHT)(City project)
1 2 3
4 5
6 7
8 11 9
10 12
13 14

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
8 | Introduction & Background
The Plan has examined and builds from a set of guiding
policies and proposed improvements anticipated to be
implemented through new development within the City Core and by improvements with the City’s right-of-way. Because the majority of land within the project area is privatelyowned, realization of improved walkability will be achieved through continued partnerships with private land owners and integration of walkability guidelines and standards within projects that are proposed to come forward over the next 20- 30 years.

The following section summarizes a few of the key City
standards and private projects that informs the Plan.

Existing Policies and Standards
City of San Ramon 2035 General Plan (2035): articulates a long-term vision and includes plan policies that focus on what is achievable over the next 20 years and lists actions to be taken by the City.

North Camino Ramon Specific Plan (2012): is a tool for
implementing the General Plan and establishes a link between General Plan policies and individual development proposals of a specific area. Located in the northern portion of the project study area, the Specific Plan serves as a framework for infill development that is pedestrian/bicycle friendly, mixed use, transit oriented and based on smart growth principles.

The Specific Plan responds to a desire to guide the future development pattern to address community needs and goals while complementing the City Center project.

City of San Ramon Municipal Code: is a collection of
ordinances adopted by the City Council and include codes governing the built environment.

City of San Ramon Engineering Design Standards: provides minimum standards for the design and construction of publicly and privately maintained improvements such as roads and sidewalks.

EXISTING POLICIES, STANDARDS, PLANS & PROJECTS

ALCOSTA
CAMINO
Iron Horse Trail

CROW CANYON ROAD

NORRIS CANYON ROAD

EXECUTIVE
BOLLIN
GER
I-680
N

ENGINEERING DESIGN, GRADING AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

TYPICAL ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION CROSS SECTION
Local Collector (not to scale)
Figure 8: Specific plans, master plans, and projects in planning phases within the study area
Figure 9: City street section from City of San Ramon Engineering Design Standards North Camino
Ramon Specific Plan
Project Area
(Blue/green area)
Iron Horse Corridor Active Transportation Study
(Yellow/orange area)
CityWalk Bishop
Ranch Project Area
(Dashed Orange
Outline)
Walking district
Project Area
(Dark Gray Area)

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Introduction & Background | 9
Existing Plans and Projects
The Walking District plan has considered a series of existing policy documents, plans, and proposed private development projects.

These plans and projects reflect one of the primary means whereby improvements to the walking environment may occur.

Iron Horse Corridor Active Transportation Study (2020): is an indepth analysis and evaluation by Contra Costa County of the Iron Horse Trail (IHT) as an active transportation corridor. It provides a series of projects and improvements to enhance the trail corridor.

City of San Ramon Bicycle Master Plan (2018): provides a blueprint for expanding the bicycle network that is accessible for all bicyclists.

The purpose of the Plan is to develop a comprehensive bicycle network that provides a vision for bikeway facilities and a suite of supportive programs and infrastructure.

San Ramon Parks, Trails, Open Space, and Recreation Master Plan (2020): establishes a set of objectives that provide direction to City staff and decision makers for the development, re-development, expansion, and enhancement of the City’s parks system, trails, open spaces, recreation facilities, and programs.

Bishop Ranch | CityWalk Master Plan and Design Guidelines (2020):
defines CityWalk’s general character and sense of place, the type, location and intensity of land uses, the ped, bike, auto and transit systems, the location and configuration of streets, parks, open space and community amenities, and the functional requirements for traffic improvements, utilities, and drainage. The project provides housing within the City Core in order to help create a dynamic environment where people live and work.

Private Project Submissions: Bishop Ranch 6 (BR 6)/SummerHill Homes will provide improved pedestrian access through BR 6 along with a mix of housing and retail which are key elements of vibrant walking spaces.

EXISTING POLICIES, STANDARDS, PLANS & PROJECTS
0 200’ 400’ 800’

CAMINO RAMON

I R O N H O R S E R E G I O N A L T R A I L P E D E S T R I A N B R I D G E

CITY CENTER

THE SHOPS AT

BISHOP RANCH

EXECUTIVE PARKWAY
I-680

BIS H O P D R I V E

S U NSET DRIVE

BOLLINGER CANYON ROAD

CITY CENTER

TRANSIT
CENTER

ANNABEL LAKE
LAKE

CECILIA
BR 3A BR 1A
BR 2600

PARKWAY

PARK PATHS

SIDEWALKS

PEDESTRIAN STREET

COMMUNITY AMENITIES

MASTER PLAN AREA

PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
* *
*NOTE: Final alignment of pedestrian paths subject to revision and refinement.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
10 | Introduction & Background
Annabel Lake is a popular spot for walking and enjoying scenic views. Lake Cecilia also offers fishing opportunities.

The San Ramon Library is a loved community resource and programming efforts such as StoryWalk have integrated reading and culture into the project area.

DESTINATIONS
Community Gems
The project area offers a concentration of many existing and planned civic, recreation, dining, and shopping
destinations. Central Park, the lakes at Bishop Ranch, the Library, City Center, and Iron Horse Trail make up just a few of the many beloved resources. Proposed parks and
features such as an amphitheater and community building at Annabel Lake will further distinguish the project area as a hub of pedestrian activity.

StoryWalk in an interactive community gem. It takes pages from popusar books and displays them along a pathway
in Central Park. The project has 20 stations and a new
book is displayed four times per year. The project is a partnership between the Rotary Club of San Ramon and
the Contra Costa County Library.

Note: The map on the following page
includes existing gems or destinations
and planned destinations that have been
identified in other planning documents and
projects. The proposed recommendations
in the following chapter will build from
these existing and planned elements.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Introduction & Background | 11
H
Iron Horse Trail
Planned Parks
Water Library Commercial
Activated Ground
Floors
Planned Development
Public Park School Restaurant
Planned Community
Amenity
Public Art/Gallery Health/Hospital Food Truck
Project study area I-680
Existing Park
Farmers Market
Annabel lake amphitheater
(Planned)
Annabel lake community building
(PLANNED)
Transit center Community center & storywalk Library
City hall
BR 3
BR 1
Marriott
Sports
Basement
Chevron
Marketplace
City Center
San Ramon Regional
Medical Center
Iron Horse Middle School
Post Office
BR 2600
BR 9
BR 15
BR 11 PG&E Learning
Center
Crow Canyon
Commons
BR 7
BR 8
BR 6
Toyota
Motor
Sales
BR 12
Figure 11: Existing and Planned Destinations and “Gems” DESTINATIONS | EXISTING & PLANNED
Note: This map includes existing gems or destinations and planned destinations that have been identified in other planning documents and projects.

The proposed recommendations in the following chapter will build from these existing and planned elements.

Transit
Center
Dorris
Eaton
School

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
12 | Introduction & Background
Standard city sidewalk paralleling Bollinger Canyon Road.

Wider, shaded pathways loop Annabel Lake and run adjacent to Lake Cecilia.

PEDESTRIAN NETWORK
Existing Sidewalks, Crosswalks, and
Signalized Intersections
A standard five to six foot sidewalk runs adjacent to
most streets within the Walking District area allowing
for pedestrian connectivity to most destinations. Wider walkways exist within Central Park, around City Center, and around Lake Cecilia and Annabel Lake. The Iron
Horse Trail is a regional paved shared-use path that
accommodates walkers, runners, and bicyclists traveling through the project area and using the trail to connect to east-west walkways in the City Core.

The majority of sidewalks are located adjacent to city
streets, which offers little buffer or physical distance from vehicular traffic and reduces the opportunity for shade along the sidewalk. Both of these conditions can deter
walking, especially in hot summer months.

Gaps in the sidewalk system can discourage walking
because they require a pedestrian to cross the street to continue along a paved sidewalk. These gaps often occur because of constrained by right-of-way, terrain, and
existing development.

Intersections and crosswalks are well-marked and most
have a crossing allowed for all four legs of the intersection.

Signalized intersections along Camino Ramon enhance
opportunities for safe east-west connections through the project area. Planned overcrossings for the Iron Horse
Trail over both Bollinger Canyon Road and Crow Canyon
Road will provide significant improvements because
pedestrians will not have to cross multiple lanes of the busy arterial roadways.

Note: The map on
the following page
includes existing
facilities and planned
sidewalks that have
been identified
in other planning
documents and
projects. The proposed
recommendations in
the following chapter
will build from these
existing and planned
elements.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Introduction & Background | 13
PEDESTRIAN NETWORK | EXISTING & PLANNED
Project study area
I-680
BR 3
BR 1
Marriott
Sports
Basement
City Center
San Ramon Regional
Medical Center
Iron Horse Middle School
Post Office
BR 2600
BR 9
BR 15
BR 11
PG&E Learning
Center
Crow Canyon
Commons
BR 7
BR 8
BR 6
Toyota
Motor
Sales
Dorris
Eaton
School
BR 12
Figure 12: Existing and Planned Pedestrian Network
Iron Horse Trail Gap In Sidewalk
Existing Sidewalk Internal Sidewalk
Planned Sidewalk StoryWalk Path
Signalized Intersection
Crosswalk Type
(yellow for school crossing)
Planned IHT Overcrossings
Planned CityWalk Sidewalks
Existing IHT Crossings Planned Parks
Planned Building
Crossings
Planned Parkway
Planned Development
Chevron
Marketplace
Transit
Center
Note: This map includes existing facilities and planned sidewalks that have been identified in other planning documents and projects. The proposed recommendations in the following chapter will build from these existing and planned elements.

T Planned Mobility Hubs
T
T T

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
14 | Introduction & Background
The Iron Horse Trail is a well-used regional shareduse path that serves as a north-south connection through Contra Costa County.

Bike boxes designated with symbols and
green paint position cyclists ahead of
cars at intersections, facilitating turning,
improving safety, and reducing delay for
cyclists.

Buffered bike lanes run along the majority of
Bishop Drive, providing ample room for cyclists
and reducing stress from riding in the roadway.

BICYCLE NETWORK
Existing Bike Connectivity and Facilities
Bike facilities in California are organized by a classification system of one through four. Class I facilities are paved shareduse paths, such as the Iron Horse Trail, that are a minimum of eight feet wide (10 foot minimum preferred) and accommodate both pedestrians and cyclists. Class II systems are bike lanes that are striped, designated space within the roadway. The buffered bike lane along Bishop Drive is an example. Best practice is for bike lanes to be provided on both sides of a street to allow cyclists to travel in the same direction as vehicles to reduce conflicts.

Class III facilities are bike routes which are low volume and low traffic speed roadways with signage indicating that the travel lanes should be shared with the cyclist. Bike routes are primarily used in residential areas, although the Bicycle Master Plan proposes routes along the north side of Iron Horse Middle School and a portion of Alcosta Boulevard.

Class IV facilities are the newest designation of bicycle facilities in California and are referred to as cycle tracks or separated bike lanes. These facilities occur in the roadway but are separated from vehicular travel lanes with a physical barrier.

Barriers can include raised islands, planters, roadside parking, or flexible posts. The cycle track is separate from the adjacent sidewalk but provides an enhanced experience for cyclists within the road corridor due to the physical separation.

Existing bike facilities in the corridor include the Iron Horse Trail shared use path, the bike lane along Bishop Drive, and a bike route from Bollinger Canyon Road to Bishop Drive. Significant improvements in the system with proposed cycle tracks and shared-use paths are recommended as part of the Bicycle Master Plan. Bishop Ranch also provides a bike share program and has planned improvements to the bike network as part of the CityWalk Master Plan. San Ramon, in concert with Contra Costa Transportation Authority will launch a Bikeshare program in late 2021 and improvements are planned for the San Ramon Transit Center, such as the addition of Bike-Fix It Stations.

Note: The map on the
following page includes
existing facilities and
planned bikeways that
have been identified
in other planning
documents and
projects. The proposed
recommendations in the
following chapter will
build from these existing
and planned elements.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Introduction & Background | 15
BICYCLE NETWORK | EXISTING & PLANNED
Project study area I-680
BR 3
BR 1
Marriott
Sports
Basement
City Center
San Ramon Regional
Medical Center
Iron Horse Middle School
Post Office
BR 2600
BR 9
BR 15
BR 11 PG&E Learning
Center
Crow Canyon
Commons
BR 7
BR 8
BR 6
Toyota
Motor
Sales
BR 12
Iron Horse Trail
Planned Class II Bike Lane
Existing Britebikes Bike Share Hubs Planned Class I Shared-Use Path Existing Class II Bike Lane
Existing Class I SharedUse Path
Planned Class III Bike Route Planned IHT Overcrossings
Existing IHT Crossings
Planned IHT Connection Enhancement
Existing Class III Bike Route Planned Class IV Separated Bike Lane T Planned CityWalk Mobility Hubs Figure 13: Existing and Planned Bicycle Network
Chevron
Marketplace
Transit
Center
Dorris
Eaton
School
Note: This map includes existing facilities and planned bikeways that have been identified in other planning documents and projects. The proposed recommendations in the following chapter will build from these existing and planned elements.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
16 | Introduction & Background
The Transit Center facility is centrally located in the project area and along the Iron Horse Trail.

Transit operates to both bring people to the Walking District and to circulate within the project area to allow people to more easily reach destinations.

TRANSIT SYSTEM
Existing Transit Connections
Located near the Iron Horse Trail and on Executive
Parkway, the city’s transit center is well-sited to serve the Walking District and allow community members
and regional visitors to access the site’s walkways and bikeways without using a personal vehicle. The shuttle
system provided by Bishop Ranch further encourages a
“park-once” strategy where people can use transit to easily reach destinations and walk or bike around a small portion of the project area while connecting to the larger area by a shuttle or bus. Bishop Ranch tenants enjoy the service free and can ride all of the County Connection buses
free with a Bishop Ranch Bus Pass. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, a City Center Circulator bus ran every 20
minutes in Bishop Ranch. Although it is no longer in service due to the pandemic, there are discussions to phased back circulator bus service in 2022.

In addition to the existing system, transit also plays a role in the planned improvements described in the CityWalk
Master Plan. As part of the planned project, three Mobility Hubs will serve both the residential neighborhoods and
office communities. The new housing base planned
for CityWalk offers multiple alternative transportation opportunities which reflect lifestyles that require less reliance on a personal vehicle. The mobility hubs will
include indoor and outdoor shaded seating, accommodate
multiple public and shared transit options, and connect with shared bike, scooter, and car-share services.

Note: The map on the following page includes
existing facilities and planned mobility hubs that
have been identified in CityWalk. The proposed
recommendations in the following chapter will build
from these existing and planned elements.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Introduction & Background | 17
TRANSIT SYSTEM | EXISTING & PLANNED
Project study area I-680
BR 3
BR 1
Marriott
Sports
Basement
City Center
San Ramon Regional
Medical Center
Iron Horse Middle School
Post Office
BR 2600
BR 9
BR 15
PG&E Learning BR 11
Center
Crow Canyon
Commons
BR 7
BR 8
BR 6
Toyota
Motor
Sales
BR 12
Iron Horse Trail Bus Stop
Bishop Ranch Shuttle Route Bus Stop with Shelter
Bishop Ranch Shuttle Stop Britebike Bike Share Hub
Planned CityWalk
Mobility Hub
T
Existing Transit Center T
T
BR
Planned Parks
Planned Development
Figure 14: Existing and Planned Transit System
Chevron
Marketplace
Transit
Center
Dorris
Eaton
School
Note: This map includes existing facilities and planned mobility hubs that have been CityWalk. The proposed recommendations in the following chapter will build from these existing and planned elements.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
19 Guidelines are driven from best practices for achieving a walkable City Core and informed by the vision and goals established for the Walking District through the community input process.

Walking District
Vision, Goals & Guidelines

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
20 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines

WALKABILITY VISION & GOALS
VISION
Promote a pedestrian- centric community

WALKING DISTRICT

PLAN GOALS
Create a comfortable place for people to
walk and bike in San Ramon’s City Core
Provide a long-term vision for pedestrian
oriented access and connectivity
Improve connectivity and establish a
sense of place for those living within the
area now and in the future
Enhance wayfinding
Identify walking and biking
loops and routes
Connect civic, recreation, and
commercial destinations
1 2
3 4
5 6
Originating as a citizen-driven effort, the vision to create a more pedestrian-centric community gained support from City leaders, stakeholders, property owners, and the greater public. The concentration of destinations, uses, activities, and amenities such as shade, water, and wider pathways present an opportunity to demonstrate how a renewed focus on walkability can be achieved within San Ramon’s City Core.

To enhance the pedestrian environment, this chapter presents an overview of industry walkability best practices and proposes a framework for improvements to further encourage walking and biking as a means to connect community members to each other and to San Ramon’s civic, commercial, recreation, and natural landscape.

The Plan’s goals were informed by the grassroots effort and input gathered during this planning process. Through implementing the Plan’s guidelines and recommendations, the goals can be achieved. This implementation is likely to occur through both public and private partnership and collaboration with other public entities, such as Contra Costa County and East Bay Regional Parks District.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 21

WALKABILITY BEST PRACTICES
What is Walkability?
Walkability refers to the degree to which a place
encourages walking as a primary means to move from
place to place. Walkable places do not just happen. They are the product of thoughtful planning and design. Jeff Speck, author of Walkability City Rules: 101 Steps to Making Better Places, described that walkability requires offering a pedestrian a better experience than would be provide
with a car. At its core, this requires four things:
• There is a REASON to walk
• The walk is SAFE
• The pedestrian is COMFORTABLE; and
• The overall experience is INTERESTING.

Planners and landscape architects have further
articulated eight principles that are subsets of the four primary elements of walkability. These principles are
presented in the diagram to the right and illustrated on the following pages. The guidelines and recommended
system framework use these principles as the framework
for enhancing the overall system. For example, gaps in the system are removed and routes and loops are identified to encourage walking.

Additionally, planned private development projects fulfill these best practices. For example, CityWalk increases
the number of destinations within the City Core, provides variety and visual interest, and connects transit and bike facilities with the pedestrian system.

ELEMENTS OF

WALKABILITY

PRINCIPLES
Traversable: Allows people to move from place to
place without major obstacles
Direct: Provides convenient connections to desired
destination(s).

Safe: Reduces conflicts between pedestrians and
vehicles and other mobility modes
Comfortable: Encourages walking by providing
amenities to improve physical and mental enjoyment
and well-being.

Lively and Interesting: Engages a person’s attention
and desire to explore and linger.

Enticing: Enhances the physical design and layout
of walking surfaces and wayfinding with increased
width, attractive signage and paving, directed views,
and nearby art and architecture.

Enhancing Health: Provides routes and loops that
encourage walking for physical and mental fitness.

Layering with Other Transportation Strategies:

Connects with transit and bicycle route and systems
to allow a person to expand the area they can reach
without using a personal vehicle.

REASON

TO WALK
SAFE

COMFORTABLE

INTERESTING

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
22 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines

WALKABILITY BEST PRACTICES
Direct
Provides convenient connections to desired
destination(s).
• Convenient
• Connected
• Increased number or concentration of destinations in
one area allows for a variety of trip purposes
• Barriers to connectivity removed
• Reduced block distances (with interesting elements
along the way) shorten how long a walk seems and
allow pedestrians to zigzag through the project area
to create the most direct route between destinations
Enhancing Health
Provides routes and loops that encourage walking for
physical and mental fitness.
• Loops and signage facilitate fitness routes
• Lengths of routes can vary for increased interest
• Amenities and surrounding uses can create
opportunities to meet neighbors and friends to
socialize
• Connections to the outdoors has mental and physical
health benefits
• Paths should be wide enough to allow for users of
multiple ability levels and interests
• Walking to work is a trip reduction strategy and part of the City’s Employer Based Trip Reduction program.

REASON TO WALK
Pathways and sidewalks can connect into larger systems that promote walking, running, connecting with nature, and meeting friends.

Smaller block lengths helps create an ideal walking environment by increasing the variety of storefronts and opportunities for interesting elements along the walkway. For example, Portland has a block size of 200 feet versus Salt Lake City’s 660 feet block size. Portland’s block size is considered more pedestrian-friendly than Salt Lake City.

Pedestrian-friendly
Block Lengths
Mega-Block Lengths
VS.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 23

WALKABILITY BEST PRACTICES
Safe
Reduces conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles
and other mobility modes.
• Short crosswalks or medians
• Marked crosswalks
• Separated crossings (overcrossing)
• Separated uses (bikes from pedestrians and bikes
from vehicles)
• Outdoor lighting for improved nighttime visibility
of pedestrians crossing intersections and improved
ability for people to see their surroundings
• Pedestrian easy to see by a motorist and bicyclist
Traversable
Allows people of all age groups and physical abilities; including children, seniors and those with mobility
challenges; to move from place to place without
major obstacles.
• Pathways are not steep
• Paving surface is firm and meets accessibility
requirements
• Alignment of walkway is not interrupted by barriers
such as rivers, rail lines, and highways
SAFE
Short, striped crosswalks increase visibility of the pedestrian and reduce the opportunity for conflicts between pedestrians and cars.

Walkways with shallow grades and minimal barriers or obstacles are easier to use than steep paths and curvilinear forms may also be incorporated.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
24 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines

WALKABILITY BEST PRACTICES
Comfortable
Encourages walking by providing amenities to
improve physical and mental enjoyment and wellbeing.
• Shade
• Seating
• Site amenities such as bottle fillers
• Traffic slowed
• Walkway set back from roadway or buffered with
roadside parking to reduce anxiety from walking along
a busy street
Layering with Other Transportation
Strategies
Connects with transit, bicycle routes, scooters and
other mobility systems to allow a person to expand
the area they can reach without using a personal
vehicle.
• Link to bike lanes and regional bike paths
• Encourage people to “park once” and walk, bike and
take transit to multiple destinations
• Utilize shuttles for short-range transit with hop-on/ hop-off options and connect with wider-serving
regional systems
• Provide free transit to increase use and consider
restricting or charging for parking
• Provide bike/scooter share facilities and connect with alternative systems to address “first and last mile”
connections to transit
• Utilize walking as a transportation demand
management strategy

COMFORTABLE
Transit can connect pedestrians with a wider range of destinations and short shuttles can provide hop-on/hop-off opportunities.

Shade and seating offer physical comfort and rest, especially important during hot summers in San Ramon.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 25

WALKABILITY BEST PRACTICES
Lively and Interesting
Engages a person’s attention and desire to explore
and linger.
• Activated and transparent ground floors of buildings
(no blank facade and minimize large areas of surface
parking)
• Intensity and concentration of uses increases overall attractiveness because people want to “people-watch”
and “see and be seen”
• Mixing uses such as office, retail, and residential
• Programming such as activities, events, and music
Enticing
Enhances the physical design and layout of walking
surfaces and wayfinding with increased width,
attractive signage and paving, directed views, and
nearby landscape, art and architecture.
• Wide pathways, curvilinear where possible
• Enhanced signage and wayfinding
• Directed views toward scenic vistas
• Art
• Landscape, paving and outdoor spaces
• Interesting architecture

INTERESTING
Wide walkways allow ample room to walk side-by-side, pass, and stop and visit with friends.

Music and a mix of retail and residential enhances placemaking and the desire to visit and explore a vibrant community core.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
26 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
ELEMENTS OF INTERESTING WALKWAYS | CURVILINEAR PATHWAYS Gathering areas offer flexibility for community members to gather and enjoy art, architecture, and landscape.

Changes in paving materials, walls and landscape can be designed as part of path systems.

Shared-use paths provide space for pedestrians and cyclists.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 27
ELEMENTS OF INTERESTING WALKWAYS | CURVILINEAR PATHWAYS Along with arcing walkways, variety of materials and lighting add visual interest.

Pathways can be designed to bend around landscape areas Along park edges, pathways have more opportunity to weave through the landscape. and reveal views.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
28 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines

WALKING SYSTEM COMPONENTS
Best practices for sidewalk widths,
amenities, and landscape elements drive
plan recommendations. The Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) provides
guidelines based on anticipated numbers
of pedestrians and desired levels of use.

Research published in the 2011 Journal of
Civil Engineering presents a design method
for determining sidewalk widths based on
observed movement patterns and desired
pedestrian levels of service.

These publications and other guidelines
utilized for cities such as Portland and
San Francisco recognize that walkability
is achieved not only by physical elements
such as widths of walkways and slowing
vehicular traffic, but it also requires a
concentration of desirable uses. This plan
focuses on guidelines for walkways and
supporting facilities. Although it recognizes
the need for supporting land uses and
activity generators, those items are
addressed through project Master Plans,
the General Plan, and Specific Plans.

Recommended Sidewalk
Widths
The minimum recommended width for
a sidewalk should allow two people to
comfortably walk side by side. Medium
pedestrian levels should allow a third
person to easily pass the other two.

San Ramon’s standard sidewalk width
of 5’ (including the 6” curb distance)
achieves the minimum standard, but
not increased use levels or comfort. To
enhance walkability, recommendations
start by, at a minimum, increasing the
width of the walkway to between 6’ and
8’. As illustrated in the section on page 42,
additional improvements include creating
a buffer between moving vehicles and
the walkway. This can be achieved by
either shifting the walkway back from the
curb and providing a landscape buffer,
providing a designated 5’-6’ bike lane, and/
or incorporating on-street parking.

These basic building blocks form the
foundation of the recommended system
framework depicted in the diagram to
the right and the map on the following
page. The hierarchy or organization of the
pedestrian system is guided by anticipated
pedestrian volumes, adjacent uses, and
known physical or terrain constraints.

However, over time, it recognizes that as
redevelopment occurs, opportunities to
increase sidewalk widths and set backs
should be implemented, where feasible.

Enhancements to the built walking
environment will be achieved by balancing
the width of sidewalks and buffers with
terrain, ownership, and available space.

Pedestrian Levels and Sidewalk Widths
From previously mentioned Best Practices

SYSTEM FRAMEWORK
Walkways (8’-12’) with
landscape buffers (from
CityWalk Master Plan)

CITYWALK

PARKWAYS
Walkways (8’-12’) with
landscape buffers

PRIMARY

CONNECTORS
PRIMARY 10’-16’’ wide paths

RECREATION
PATH
SECONDARY 5’-8’ wide paths

RECREATION
PATH
5’-8’ wide walkways
set back/buffered from
roadway

SECONDARY

CONNECTORS
Widen and separate uses
(14’ Rolling Path & 6-8’
Walking/Recreation Path)

IRON HORSE
TRAIL
(REGIONAL)
• Minimum 5’
sidewalk width (6’
preferred) with
landscape buffer
where possible
• Medium
pedestrian levels:
8’ - 12’ sidewalk
widths
• Medium to high
pedestrian levels:
12’-16’ sidewalk
width

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 29
Proposed/Enhanced IHT Connection
(formalize connection and provide
signage)
Existing Bus/Shuttle Stop or Transit
Hub
Proposed CityWalk Mobility Hub
Existing Britebike Bike Share Hub
Primary Recreation Path
Secondary Recreation Path
Pathway Connectors Permitted
Through Buildings
Enhanced or Relocated Bridge with
Improved Visual Connection to IHT
Proposed Bikeable Overcrossing

PROPOSED WALKING SYSTEM FRAMEWORK
Iron Horse Trail (IHT)
(widen to separate
rolling path from
walking/running
path & provide
shade and seating)
Proposed CityWalk Parkway (wider than
City standard with landscape buffers)
Proposed Primary Connectors (wider than
City standard with landscape buffers)
Proposed Secondary Connectors (where
possible, widen and/or provide landscape
buffer)
Figure 15: Proposed Walking System Classifications
Note: System framework is diagrammatic and not indicative of final path alignments. Paths can be curvilinear where space, ROW, and project goals allow.

Project study area I-680
BR 3

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
30 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
GUIDELINES | IRON HORSE TRAIL
Overview
The Iron Horse Trail provides a 32-mile regional biking and walking connector through Contra Costa and Alameda
counties. The shared-use path sees regular use and offers multiple opportunities to serve a walking and biking
backbone for north to south movement throughout the
project area. Contra Costa County completed a corridor
study of the trail in 2020. Recommendations align with
these Walking District guidelines to offer enhanced
facilities for users.

Guidelines
Aligned with the 2020 Corridor Study, guidelines include the following and are depicted in the section, imagery and illustrations below:
• Separate primary uses
• Provide a 14’ “rolling” path (bike, scooter, etc.)
• Provide a 6’-8’ walking/running path
• Offer shade and seating, where possible
• Enhance visibility of trail connectors to Central Park • Provide signage to connect to Walking District and
Central Park
• Develop overcrossings at Bollinger Canyon Road and
Crow Canyon Road
• Formalize desired trail connections to adjacent
commercial, residential, civic, and conference uses
Rolling path Walking
Path Landscape
Varies 14’ Varies 6’-8’ Varies
Landscape Landscape
Figure 16: Iron Horse Trail Proposed Section Improvements

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 31
GUIDELINES | IRON HORSE TRAIL
Enhanced bridge crossings and east-west linkages increase the visual and physical connection of pedestrians and cyclists to the Walking District.

Signage promoting the Walking District can be layered into the Iron Horse Trail’s signage system, similar to how the Coastal Trail integrates with other signage systems.

Seating options can be integrated as pull-offs along the trail. Crossings provide opportunities for users to access the trail and to connect to the Walking District’s bike and pedestrian network.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
32 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
GUIDELINES | IRON HORSE TRAIL
Iron Horse Middle School
Parking Garage
BR-3 (E) BR-3 (E)
BR-3 (E)
Transit Center
Iron Horse Trail
Central Park
Executive Parkway
Primary
Connector
Primary
Connector

IHT WALKING DISTRICT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Enhance Visual
Connection to
IHT
Figure 17: Iron Horse Trail Proposed Plan Improvements (Executive Parkway to Bollinger Canyon Road) Primary WD/IHT
Connections
Iron Horse Trail -
Increased Width and
Separation of Uses
Enhanced Landscape
IHT Overcrossing
Asphalt Path
Asphalt Parking Lot
Decision Wayfinding
Confirmation
Wayfinding
Proposed Seating
Area
Sidewalk Connections
Legend

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 33
GUIDELINES | IRON HORSE TRAIL
BR-3 (E)
BR-3 (E) Parking Garage
Future Hotel
City Hall
Future IHT Overcrossing at Bollinger Canyon
BR-3A-2
Future Mixed-use Residential BR-3A-1
Future Mixeduse Residential
Iron Horse Trail
Central Park
Bollinger Canyon Road
Enhance Visual
Connections
Enhance Visual
and Physical
Connection to IHT
Primary Connector
Primary
Connector

IHT WALKING DISTRICT PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Primary WD/IHT
Connections
Iron Horse Trail -
Increased Width and
Separation of Uses
Enhanced Landscape
IHT Overcrossing
Asphalt Path
Asphalt Parking Lot
Decision Wayfinding
Confirmation
Wayfinding
Proposed Seating
Area
Sidewalk Connections
Legend

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
34 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
GUIDELINES | IRON HORSE TRAIL
Figure 18: Existing Image of East/West Connection to the Iron Horse Trail Before Image

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 35
GUIDELINES | IRON HORSE TRAIL
Figure 19: Rendering of Representative Enhanced East/West Connection to the Iron Horse Trail Rendering provided to convey ideas, actual improvements may vary.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
36 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
GUIDELINES | IRON HORSE TRAIL
Figure 20: Existing Image of Iron Horse Trail Corridor
Before Image

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 37
GUIDELINES | IRON HORSE TRAIL
Figure 21: Rendering of Representative Enhanced Iron Horse Trail Corridor with Shade and Seating Rendering provided to convey
ideas, actual improvements
may vary.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
38 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
GUIDELINES | PARKWAYS
Overview
As part of the CityWalk Master Plan, Sunset Development proposes to enhance walkability and biking by creating
a system of tree-lined parkways along Camino Ramon,
Executive Parkway, and Bishop Drive. These guidelines
build upon those recommendations and extend the
parkway system north along Camino Ramon. They further
refine the guidelines included in the Bishop Ranch Design Guidelines to increase the widths of the shared-use path, where possible, and reduce the widths of vehicle travel lanes to incorporate bike lanes along Camino Ramon.

Figure 22: Proposed Parkways Section along Camino Ramon

SIDEWALK SHARED-USE SIDEWALK PARKING
PATH

TRAVEL MEDIAN
LANES
TRAVEL
LANES

RESIDENTIAL

LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE
WALKING CORRIDOR (50’ +/-) WALKING CORRIDOR (35’ +/-)
Width of walking corridor elements will vary depending on conditions. This section represents a guideline for desired conditions. Walkways may be curvilinear where space, ROW, and project goals allow.

Guidelines
Guidelines include the following and are depicted in the following section and imagery:
• Includes shared-use path and two sidewalks along adjacent residential areas
• Reduce width of travel lanes and turn lanes where possible to and reallocate space for bikes (add bike lanes where possible) and pedestrians (to increase walkways or add shade and landscape buffers
• Separate shared-use paths from travel lanes with vegetated/ shaded landscape buffer
• Protect existing trees, if feasible, and provide shade where needed • Provide seating and shade at gathering areas, commercial areas, dining, and parks
• Incorporate art, interactive displays and exercise equipment as appropriate

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 39
GUIDELINES | PARKWAYS
The shared-use path should connect to destinations and include a mix of trees, groundcovers, and low shrubs for an interesting visual experience. Consider ncorporating curvilinear alignments where space and project goals allow.

Crosswalks should be as short as feasible or provide a small median to reduce the length of time a pedestrian is walking across travel lanes.

Signage can be integrated into the paving to enhance placemaking and designate different loops and routes for exploration.

Parkways include an off-street separated path that includes shade, seating, lighting, and responds to adjacent land uses and park systems.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Project study area I-680
BR 3

TRANSIT
CENTER
BR 1
Shops At
Bishop
Ranch
Marriott
Sports
City Hall Basement
City Center
San Ramon Regional
Medical Center
Dorris Eaton
School
Post Office
Community
Center
Central Park
BR 2600
BR 9
BR 15
BR 12
Annabel Lake Bollinger Canyon Road
Crow Canyon road
Executive Parkway
Camino Ramon
Bishop Drive
Iron Horse Trail
Alcosta Boulevard
BR 11 PG&E Learning
Center
Crow Canyon
Commons
BR 7
BR 8
BR 6
Toyota
Motor
Sales
Iron Horse Middle School
Norris Canyon Road
Chevron
Marketplace
Library
40 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
Community Benefits
GUIDELINES | PARKWAYS
Design Strategies
• Widen sidewalk
• Protect existing trees
where feasible and
provide shade where
needed
• Provide seating and
shade at gathering
areas, commercial
areas, dining, and
parks
1 - BISHOP DRIVE
Note: Section shows proposed conditions diagrammed
over an existing section that is faded back
Existing Section
12’
Proposed Section

LAKE LANDSCAPE SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE LAND
SCAPE
BIKE

LANE W/
BUFFER
BIKE

LANE W/
BUFFER
WIDEN
SIDE
WALK

TRAVEL LANDSCAPE PARKING
LANES
WALKING CORRIDOR (50’ +)
• Separated uses (bikes from
pedestrians and bikes from vehicles)
• Annabel Lake and surrounding
restaurants offer views and
supporting uses
• Connects to walking loop around
Annabel Lake
• Walkways around Annabel Lake
include seating & shade
1 2
3 10.1.a
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Project study area I-680
BR 3

TRANSIT
CENTER
BR 1
Shops At
Bishop
Ranch
Marriott
Sports
City Hall Basement
City Center
San Ramon Regional
Medical Center
Dorris Eaton
School
Post Office
Community
Center
Central Park
BR 2600
BR 9
BR 15
BR 12
Annabel Lake Bollinger Canyon Road
Crow Canyon road
Executive Parkway
Camino Ramon
Bishop Drive
Iron Horse Trail
Alcosta Boulevard
BR 11 PG&E Learning
Center
Crow Canyon
Commons
BR 7
BR 8
BR 6
Toyota
Motor
Sales
Iron Horse Middle School
Norris Canyon Road
Chevron
Marketplace
Library
Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 41
2 GUIDELINES | PARKWAYS
2 - CAMINO RAMON
Design Strategies
• Provide shared-use
path (west side of
Camino Ramon) with
significant landscape
area
• Provide sidewalks
along future residential
areas and along east
side of roadway
• Reduce visual impact
of roadway by
providing landscape
median, where
possible
Note: Section shows proposed conditions per approved
CityWalk Bishop Ranch Design Guidelines 2020
Proposed CityWalk Section

SIDEWALK SHARED-USE SIDEWALK PARKING
PATH

TRAVEL MEDIAN
LANES
TRAVEL
LANES

RESIDENTIAL

LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE
WALKING CORRIDOR (50’ +/-) WALKING CORRIDOR (25’ +/-)
• Walkways meander between
existing trees where possible and
are not steep
• Future adjacent residential uses and
transit stops active the streetscape
• Walkways provide direct access for
future adjacent residential uses
• Large landscape buffers offer shade
Community Benefits
3 1

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
42 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
GUIDELINES | PARKWAYS
3 - EXECUTIVE PARKWAY
Design Strategies
• Protect existing trees
and provide shade
where feasible
• Widen pathways and
separate walkways
from roadway
• Buffer bike lanes to
separate from travel
lanes
12’
Existing Section
Note: Section shows proposed conditions diagrammed
over an existing section that is faded back
Proposed Section

PARKING LANDSCAPE LAND
SCAPE
LAND
SCAPE
BIKE

LANE W/
BUFFER
BIKE

LANE W/
BUFFER
SIDE
WALK

TRAVEL LANDSCAPE PARKING
LANE
TRAVEL
LANES
Community Benefits
• Wide, buffered bikeways separate
bikes from pedestrians and from
vehicles)
• Future residential uses along with
existing transit and bikeshare
facilities active the streetscape
• Provides direct connection to the
Transit Center and Iron Horse Trail
• Preserving existing trees provides
shade and comfort
Project study area I-680
BR 3

SEPARATE

SIDEWALK FROM

ROAD WITH

LANDSCAPE

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 43

PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
44 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
GUIDELINES | PRIMARY CONNECTORS
Overview
Primary Connectors are areas with high
levels of anticipated pedestrian use. Walking
corridors designated to be enhanced as Primary
Connectors include walkways along Camino
Ramon, Norris Canyon Road, Bishop Drive,
and connections to Alcosta Boulevard along
Bollinger Canyon Road and by the Iron Horse
Middle School. Primary Connectors are similar
to CityWalk Parkways, but are not part of the
CityWalk Design Guidelines.

Guidelines
Guidelines include the following and are
depicted in the following section and imagery:
• Provide 8’-12’ walkways, where possible
• Provide bike lanes, where possible
• Separate from roadways, where possible
with vegetated buffer/shade and/or a bike
lane along the roadway
• Provide shade and protect existing trees,
where feasible and in good condition
• Provide seating associated with parks, views,
and adjacent uses
• Incorporate signage and utilize Primary
Connectors as foundational elements of
walking loops/routes
• Incorporate art, interactive displays, and
exercise equipment, where appropriate
Varies Varies 8’-12’ Varies
Figure 23: Proposed Primary Pedestrian Connectors Section Width of walking corridor elements will vary depending on conditions. This section represents a guideline for desired conditions. Walkways may be curvilinear where space, ROW, and project goals allow.

Travel Lane Landscape & Landscape
Amenity Area
Walking Path
Walking Corridor
Overall Width Varies

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 45
GUIDELINES | PRIMARY CONNECTORS
Incorporation of art along the connectors and within the Walking District can occur in many forms and should be coordinated with stakeholders as opportunities are presented.

Accentuating crossings with paving, seating, and signage increases visibility and can also serve to reduce crosswalk widths and slow traffic to make pedestrians more comfortable.

Similar to Parkways, Primary Connectors are wider walkways with shade and separated from the roadway.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Project study area I-680
BR 3

TRANSIT
CENTER
BR 1
Shops At
Bishop
Ranch
Marriott
Sports
City Hall Basement
City Center
San Ramon Regional
Medical Center
Dorris Eaton
School
Post Office
Community
Center
Central Park
BR 2600
BR 9
BR 15
BR 12
Annabel Lake Bollinger Canyon Road
Crow Canyon road
Executive Parkway
Camino Ramon
Bishop Drive
Iron Horse Trail
Alcosta Boulevard
BR 11 PG&E Learning
Center
Crow Canyon
Commons
BR 7
BR 8
BR 6
Toyota
Motor
Sales
Iron Horse Middle School
Norris Canyon Road
Chevron
Marketplace
Library
46 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
Design Strategies
• Reduce travel lanes
where possible
and, reallocate
space to cyclists for
buffered bike lanes
(northbound and
southbound)
• Increase sidewalk
widths and provide
landscape buffer
where possible
1 - BISHOP DRIVE
3 2
GUIDELINES | PRIMARY CONNECTORS
Note: Section shows proposed conditions diagrammed
over an existing section that is faded back
Existing Section
1 12’
Proposed Section

FREEWAY LANDSCAPE BUFFER
BIKE
LANE
LAND
SCAPE
BUFFER
BIKE
LANE
WIDEN
SIDE
WALK

TRAVEL LANDSCAPE PARKING
LANES
Community Benefits
• Wide, buffered bikeways separate
bikes from pedestrians and from
vehicles)
• Walkway loops can be integrated
into community fitness
programming
• Creates long walking loop for fitness
and health
• Preserving existing trees buffers
walkway from I-680
WALKING CORRIDOR (50’ +)

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Project study area I-680
BR 3

TRANSIT
CENTER
BR 1
Shops At
Bishop
Ranch
Marriott
Sports
City Hall Basement
City Center
San Ramon Regional
Medical Center
Dorris Eaton
School
Post Office
Community
Center
Central Park
BR 2600
BR 9
BR 15
BR 12
Annabel Lake Bollinger Canyon Road
Crow Canyon road
Executive Parkway
Camino Ramon
Bishop Drive
Iron Horse Trail
Alcosta Boulevard
BR 11 PG&E Learning
Center
Crow Canyon
Commons
BR 7
BR 8
BR 6
Toyota
Motor
Sales
Iron Horse Middle School
Norris Canyon Road
Chevron
Marketplace
Library
Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 47
Design Strategies
• Provide walkways
separate sidewalk
from roadway, where
possible
• Protect existing trees
• Provide seating
associated with parks
and adjacent uses
• Incorporate signage
and utilize Primary
Connectors as
foundational elements
of walking loops/routes
3 1
GUIDELINES | PRIMARY CONNECTORS
2 - NORRIS CANYON ROAD
Note: Section shows proposed conditions diagrammed
over an existing section that is faded back
Existing
Section
2 Norris Tech Center Toyota Motors
Proposed
Section
BIKE
LANE
BIKE
LANE
SIDE
WALK

LAND LANDSCAPE
SCAPE

PARKING LANDSCAPE TURN
LANE
TRAVEL
LANES
TRAVEL
LANES
Community Benefits
• Outdoor lighting improves visibility
of pedestrians in evening hours
• Walkway loops can be integrated into
community fitness programming
• Provides direct connection to the
Iron Horse Trail and opportunity to
enhance linkage across I-680 and
connect to trail system in west San
Ramon
• Separating walkways from the road
decreases stress and increases
shade
WALKING CORRIDOR (25’ +/-) WALKING CORRIDOR (30’ +)

WIDEN &

SEPARATE

SIDEWALK

FROM ROAD W/

LANDSCAPE

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Project study area I-680
BR 3

TRANSIT
CENTER
BR 1
Shops At
Bishop
Ranch
Marriott
Sports
City Hall Basement
City Center
San Ramon Regional
Medical Center
Dorris Eaton
School
Post Office
Community
Center
Central Park
BR 2600
BR 9
BR 15
BR 12
Annabel Lake Bollinger Canyon Road
Crow Canyon road
Executive Parkway
Camino Ramon
Bishop Drive
Iron Horse Trail
Alcosta Boulevard
BR 11 PG&E Learning
Center
Crow Canyon
Commons
BR 7
BR 8
BR 6
Toyota
Motor
Sales
Iron Horse Middle School
Norris Canyon Road
Chevron
Marketplace
Library
1 2
3 48 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
GUIDELINES | PRIMARY CONNECTORS
3 - CAMINO RAMON
Design Strategies
• Incorporate shared use
path on west side of
roadway and separate
from roadway with
vegetated buffer/
shade, where possible
• Provide shade and
protect existing trees
• Provide seating
associated with parks,
and adjacent uses
• Incorporate signage
Existing Section
Note: Section shows proposed conditions diagrammed
over an existing section that is faded back
Proposed Section
Community Benefit

PARKING LANDSCAPE TURN LANDSCAPE PARKING
LANE
TRAVEL
LANES
TRAVEL
LANES
• Walkways are buffered from
roadways while maintaining gentle
grades
• Future adjacent residential uses and
transit stops active the streetscape
• Walkways provide direct access for
future adjacent residential uses
• Preserving existing trees provides
shade
WALKING CORRIDOR (25’ +/-) WALKING CORRIDOR (20’ +/-)
EXTEND

CITYWALK
SHARED

USE PATH

WIDEN &

SEPARATE

SIDEWALK

FROM ROAD W/

LANDSCAPE

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 49

PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
50 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
GUIDELINES | SECONDARY CONNECTORS
Overview
Secondary Connectors are areas with low
to medium levels of anticipated pedestrian
use. Designations may change with new
development. Walking corridors designated
to be enhanced as Secondary Connectors
include walkways along roadways
not anticipated to have high levels of
pedestrian use, such as Alcosta Boulevard.

Enhancements may be achieved by
providing shade and buffering the walkway
from vehicular traffic, where possible and as
redevelopment occurs.

Guidelines
Guidelines include the following and are
depicted in the following section and
imagery:
• Provide 5’-8’ walkways
• Separate from roadways, where possible
with vegetated buffer/shade and/or a
bike lane along the roadway
• Provide shade and protect existing trees,
where feasible and in good condition
• Provide seating associated with parks,
views, and adjacent uses
• Incorporate signage
• Incorporate art, interactive displays, and
exercise equipment, where appropriate
Travel Lane Landscape Walking Path Landscape
Walking Corridor
Overall Width Varies: 12’ - 14’
Varies Varies 5’-8’ Varies
Width of elements will vary depending on conditions
Figure 24: Proposed Secondary Pedestrian Connectors Section Width of walking corridor elements will vary depending on conditions. This section represents a guideline for desired conditions. Walkways may be curvilinear where space, ROW, and project goals allow.

Parkway Locations
Proposed Conditions
• Camino Ramon (North of Norris Canyon
Road)
• Crow Canyon Road
• Bollinger Canyon Road
• Alcosta Boulevard
• Crow Canyon Commons roadways
• Shops at Bishop Ranch roadways
• Marketplace
• Montgomery Street
• BR 6
• Other collector roadways

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 51
GUIDELINES | SECONDARY CONNECTORS
Existing trees should be retained, where possible. Terrain may require creative design strategies for walkway alignments and partnerships to achieve the desired separation between sidewalk and travel lanes.

Art can be thoughtfully incorporated where physical space is limited to screen parking and provide an attractive edge for the pedestrian walkway.

Secondary Connectors serve lower volumes of pedestrians and are therefore narrower than Primary Connectors.

Walkways are set back from the curb where possible to allow for shade, lighting, and reduce anxiety associated with walking near a roadway.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Project study area I-680
BR 3

TRANSIT
CENTER
BR 1
Shops At
Bishop
Ranch
Marriott
Sports
City Hall Basement
City Center
San Ramon Regional
Medical Center
Dorris Eaton
School
Post Office
Community
Center
Central Park
BR 2600
BR 9
BR 15
BR 12
Annabel Lake Bollinger Canyon Road
Crow Canyon road
Executive Parkway
Camino Ramon
Bishop Drive
Iron Horse Trail
Alcosta Boulevard
BR 11 PG&E Learning
Center
Crow Canyon
Commons
BR 7
BR 8
BR 6
Toyota
Motor
Sales
Iron Horse Middle School
Norris Canyon Road
Chevron
Marketplace
Library
52 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
GUIDELINES | SECONDARY CONNECTORS
1 - CAMINO RAMON (NORTHERN SECTION)
Note: Section shows proposed conditions diagrammed
over an existing section that is faded back
Design Strategies
• Provide walkways
separated from
roadways, where
possible
• Provide shade and
protect existing trees,
where feasible and in
good condition
• Incorporate signage
• Incorporate art and
interactive displays
Proposed Section
Existing Section
Community Benefits

PARKING LANDSCAPE LAND LANDSCAPE PARKING
SCAPE
TRAVEL
LANES
TURN
LANE
TRAVEL
LANES
• Walkways are relatively level
and buffering from the roadway
increases comfort
• Interesting landscaping and
paving materials can increase
visual interest and placemaking
• Walkways connect to commercial
and community destinations
• Preserving existing trees provides
shade
1 2
WALKING CORRIDOR (25’ +/-) WALKING CORRIDOR (30’ +/-)

SEPARATE

SIDEWALK FROM

ROAD WITH

LANDSCAPE

SEPARATE

SIDEWALK FROM

ROAD WITH

LANDSCAPE

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Project study area I-680
BR 3

TRANSIT
CENTER
BR 1
Shops At
Bishop
Ranch
Marriott
Sports
City Hall Basement
City Center
San Ramon Regional
Medical Center
Dorris Eaton
School
Post Office
Community
Center
Central Park
BR 2600
BR 9
BR 15
BR 12
Annabel Lake Bollinger Canyon Road
Crow Canyon road
Executive Parkway
Camino Ramon
Bishop Drive
Iron Horse Trail
Alcosta Boulevard
BR 11 PG&E Learning
Center
Crow Canyon
Commons
BR 7
BR 8
BR 6
Toyota
Motor
Sales
Iron Horse Middle School
Norris Canyon Road
Chevron
Marketplace
Library
Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 53
GUIDELINES | SECONDARY CONNECTORS
2 - CAMINO RAMON (SOUTHERN SECTION)
Design Strategies
• Separate eastern
walkway from roadway
with vegetated buffer/
shade, where possible
• Provide shade and
protect existing trees
• Provide seating
associated with parks,
and adjacent uses
• Incorporate signage
Note: Section shows proposed conditions diagrammed over an existing section that is faded back
Existing Section
12’
Proposed Section

LAKE LANDSCAPE LAND LANDSCAPE PARKING
SCAPE
CREATE

CITYWALK

PARKWAY
(SEE

PARKWAYS)
TRAVEL
LANES
TURN
LANE
TRAVEL
LANES
• Walkways are relatively level
and buffering from the roadway
increases comfort
• Future CityWalk residential uses
and existing transit stops active
the streetscape
• Walkways connect to adjacent
office uses
• Preserving existing trees provides
shade
Community Benefits
2 1
WALKING CORRIDOR (50’ +/-) WALKING CORRIDOR (25’ +/-)

SEPARATE

SIDEWALK FROM

ROAD WITH

LANDSCAPE

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
54 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
GUIDELINES | PRIMARY RECREATION PATHS
Overview
Primary Recreation Paths are
located in parks, civic areas, or other
recreation areas and are already
separated from vehicular traffic.

These systems offer a variety of
opportunities to meet user needs
ranging from fitness to leisurely
strolls and site seeing. Primary
Recreation Paths are wider than
the secondary system and create
attractive, shaded segments of
walking loops and routes. Recreation
paths are located in Central Park
and around the lakes and linear park
system of Bishop Ranch. Connections
to and circulation within the path
network are important.

Guidelines
Guidelines include the following and
are depicted in the following section
and imagery:
• Provide 10’-16’ wide walkways
• Orient users with kiosk signage
and maps
• Provide shade and seating
• Incorporate art and interactive
displays
• Provide drinking fountains
and restrooms as part of park
facilities
Varies 10’-16’ Varies
Figure 25: Proposed Primary Recreation Paths Section
Landscape Walking Path Landscape
Width of elements will vary depending on conditions
Width of walking corridor elements will vary depending on conditions. This section represents a guideline for desired conditions. Walkways may be curvilinear where space, ROW, and project goals allow.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 55
GUIDELINES | PRIMARY RECREATION PATHS
Landscape strategies should incorporate shade where possible and complement existing trees to create a natural, informal and attractive experience.

Pathways should respond to the edge of the recreation area and provide opportunities for seating and socializing. Facilities for trash and dog waste should be provided.

Primary Recreation Paths are wider and offer a range of paving materials that respond to the surrounding environment and potential path uses.

Drinking fountains, parallel trail systems, and shade are incorporated as part of pathways within parks.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
56 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
GUIDELINES | SECONDARY RECREATION PATHS
Overview
Secondary Recreation Paths are
walkways in parks that anticipate
having lower pedestrian volumes
and do not serve as major linkages to
other trails or community destinations.

They are spur walkways that are sized
appropriately for the level of use.

Guidelines
Guidelines include the following and are
depicted in the following section and
imagery:
• Provide 5’-8’ wide walkways
• Incorporate signage
• Provide shade and seating
• Incorporate art and interactive
displays
Varies 5’-8’ Varies
Figure 26: Proposed Secondary Recreation Paths Section
Landscape Walking Path Landscape
Width of elements will vary depending on conditions
Width of walking corridor elements will vary depending on conditions. This section represents a guideline for desired conditions. Walkways may be curvilinear where space, ROW, and project goals allow.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 57
GUIDELINES | SECONDARY RECREATION PATHS
Interactive displays can be expanded to be incorporated throughout the Walking District.

Art in parks and recreation areas reinforces the significance of culture for the San Ramon Citizens.

Secondary Recreation Paths serve lower numbers of pedestrians and are narrower than Primary Path systems.

Shade, seating, picnic areas, and other amenities are located off Secondary Recreation Paths to create an interesting walk and allow people to stop and enjoy the outdoors.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
58 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
Loops can be named and signage incorporated to distinguish particular characteristics of the different routes.

Seating opportunities and art can vary along different routes to enhance placemaking and provide interest.

PROPOSED WALKING LOOPS
Loops and Routes
Enhancing walkways and connections and providing
supporting amenities presents a variety of opportunities to create loops and designated routes within the City
Core. Multiple options increases desire for pedestrians to explore and try new loops and routes over time. A series of organized loops or routes are proposed on the map on the following page. These loops link major destinations and gems and are likely to see the highest use. The routes can be mixed and layered as desired on an individual basis, however, to extend or shorten loops. This flexibility should be encouraged and supported through both physical
signage and digital applications that indicate mileage, walking distances, and distinctive features of the different loops.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 59

PROPOSED WALKING LOOPS
Project study area I-680
Iron Horse Trail (IHT) Story Walk (varies depending on time reading signs) (0.4 miles) Central Park Loop (15-25 minutes) (1.0 miles)
The Lakes Loop (30-60 minutes) (2.1 miles)
CityWalk Loop (35-45 minutes) (1.6 miles)
Perimeter Loop (55-75 minutes) (2.3 miles)
IHT Loop (60-90 minutes) (2.6 miles)
Connectors Between IHT, Central Park, and Bishop Ranch Loops Note: These loops represent suggested
walking patterns, there is opportunity to
explore other paths and alignments in the
future. Loops and routes could be mixed and
matched to provide variety and connectivity
between Central Park, CityWalk, and Bishop
Ranch; As system builds out to Crow Canyon
and Market Place, loops may be extended.

Pathway Connectors Permitted
Through Buildings
Midblock Connectivity
(both sides of street)
Walking District Pathways and
Connectors (not part of a named
loop)
Annabel Lake
Lake
Cecilia
BR 3
BR 1
Shops At
Bishop
Ranch
Marriott
Sports
Basement
Public
Transit
Center
City
Hall
City Center
San Ramon Regional
Medical Center
Dorris Eaton School
Post Office
Community Center
Central Park
BR 2600
BR 9
BR 15
BR 12
BR 11 PG&E Learning
Center
Crow Canyon
Commons
BR 7
BR 8
BR 6
Toyota
Motor
Sales
Iron Horse Middle School Library
Crow Canyon road
Bollinger Canyon Road
Executive Parkway
Norris Canyon Road
Bishop Drive
Iron Horse Trail
Alcosta Boulevard
Figure 27: Proposed Walking Loops
Chevron
Marketplace

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
60 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
Seating and art can occur in multiple forms and opportunities as presented by adjacent parks and open spaces.

Drinking fountains and restrooms should be incorporated into parks and locations such as City Center, where they can be more easily maintained as part of regular maintenance operations.

PROPOSED SUPPORTING AMENITIES
Amenities
Support amenities encourage walking by providing areas
to sit, rest, socialize, rehydrate, and use restroom facilities.

Art creates visual interest; improves aesthetics; contributes to identity, shared history, and cultural appreciation; raises public awareness; and boosts economies by attracting
visitors. Trash receptacles and dog waste stations and
bags help keep an area litter free and attractive. Lighting increases safety, expands the hours of potential use during the evening hours, and can be designed to orchestrate
views and enhance the overall beauty of the outdoor
walking environment.

Each of these amenities are important to consider and
incorporate within the project area. The map on the
following page illustrates a diagrammatic approach for
general locations for elements such as seating, drinking fountains, public art, and restrooms may be located and is not meant to limit or promise a particular number of amenities nor does it include every existing bench or
amenity. It is recognized that as new development occurs, areas of high pedestrian use should have more amenities.

Additional locations for art will be added as opportunities present themselves and may vary from the locations
shown in the diagram. Overall, amenities such as drinking fountains and restrooms should be coordinated with other public facilities (e.g., parks, civic areas, and large retail areas). Additional seating and shade are recommended
along the Iron Horse Trail and on the western edge of
Central Park to encourage trail users to enter the park and sit to relax and enjoy the scenic views.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 61

PROPOSED SUPPORTING AMENITIES
Project study area I-680
Iron Horse Trail (IHT)
Proposed Seating
Proposed Public Art
(Art locations to be added as
opportunities present themselves;
final, specific locations may vary
from diagram)
Existing Seating
Existing Public Art
Proposed Drinking Fountain
Existing Drinking Fountain
Existing Restrooms
Proposed Restrooms
Pathway Connectors
Permitted Through
Buildings
Walking District Pathways and
Connectors
Annabel Lake
Lake
Cecilia
BR 3
BR 1
Shops At
Bishop
Ranch
Marriott
Sports
Basement City
Hall
City Center
San Ramon Regional
Medical Center
Dorris Eaton School
Post Office
Community Center
BR 2600
BR 9
BR 15
BR 12
BR 11 PG&E Learning
Center
Crow Canyon
Commons
BR 7
BR 8
BR 6
Toyota
Motor
Sales
Iron Horse Middle School Library
Crow Canyon road
Bollinger Canyon Road
Executive Parkway
Norris Canyon Road
Bishop Drive
Iron Horse Trail
Alcosta Boulevard
Figure 28: Proposed Supporting Amenities
Chevron
Marketplace
Public
Transit
Center

CENTRAL PARK

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
62 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
WAYFINDING | BRANDING & LOGO CONCEPTS
Branding and Logo Concepts
Placemaking and identity are reinforced through a
brand. As part of the project, City staff and stakeholders were engaged to give direction and guidance on what
the brand for the Walking District might be and how a
representative logo might reflect the inherent qualities and values for the Walking District. Input led designers to explore typography, graphics, and colors that are playful, clean, and timeless. The logos depicted in the figures to the right illustrate the ideas for movement, connectivity, diversity, and the hills and lakes of San Ramon. On the following page, a preferred family of fonts and colors were developed. These colors could be integrated into the logo which can in turn be used in both signage and marketing materials and in the use of mobile app branding.

Final selection of the logo should weigh the need to
reproduce it in a variety of mediums and materials. It
could be stamped in pavement, etched on glass, added to a sign, or embroidered on a shirt. It must also both stand on its own and layer within other signage and branding
systems, including the City, Iron Horse Trail, Bishop Ranch, and City Center.

Although the logo and tagline was developed in
consideration of a defined project area, evolution of
the brand revealed a larger opportunity to connect
with the project vision to promote San Ramon as a
pedestrian-centric community. This means walkability
and encouraging pedestrian movement extends beyond
the project boundaries and into the entire city. Public and private areas that embrace walkability concepts can share their participation by incorporating the brand and convening events to promote walking.

Figure 29: Logo Concept 1
Figure 30: Logo Concept 2 Figure 31: Logo Concept 3
Figure 32: Logo Concept 4

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 63

THE WALKING DISTRICT
BRAND IS:

PLAYFUL
CLEAN

TIMELESS
Balances the URBAN and
the NATURAL
Balances the PAST and
the FUTURE
Connected, Beautiful, Fun,
Inviting, Vibrant, Dynamic,
Community Oriented, Iconic,
Social RGB: 56:194:192
CMYK: 67:0:30:0
HEX: 38C2C0
RGB: 12:76:140
CMYK: 100:78:17:3
HEX: 0C4C8C
RGB: 255:76:21
CMYK: 0:85:99:0
HEX: FF4C15
RGB: 189:217:242
CMYK: 24:6:0:0
HEX: BDD9F2
RGB: 19:66:66
CMYK: 88:54:62:47
HEX: 134242
RGB: 244:177:42
CMYK: 3:33:96:0
HEX: F4B12A
HEADING 1
HEADING 2

DIGITAL APP EXAMPLE
BODY
LABELS

SS GREYHOOD
TWO 30PT

SS GREYHOOD TWO
18PT
Poppins Regular 12PT
Concept 2 was inspired by the
foundational narrative of primary
colors. This palette is iconic
as well as playful,. It suggests
an aesthetic that is elemental,
grounded, and fun.

Poppins Medium 10PT
544
2:15 1.8
MI
10,000

SAN RAMON WALKS
TOTALS
CALORIES BURNED Walking District
health tip,
connection to a
local business,
route suggestion
on, current GPS
location, etc.

STEPS
TIME

DISTANCE WALKED
Closest Bike
Share Location
WAYFINDING | BRANDING & LOGO CONCEPTS
Figure 33: Proposed Color Palette, Fonts, and Representative Digital App

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
64 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
WAYFINDING | SIGNAGE TYPES
Levels of Signage
Three levels of pedestrian signage were identified as
being most appropriate to incorporate within the Walking District. The types of signs are described above. The map on the following page identifies general locations for the signage types and the imagery on the pages following the map show how what the different signage types look like and how they could be used throughout the project area.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 65
PROPOSED WAYFINDING | DIAGRAMMATIC SIGNAGE LOCATIONS
Project study area I-680
Iron Horse Trail (IHT)
(County-Owned Land, Managed by
East Bay Regional Parks District)
Walking District Pathways and
Connectors
Note: Map is
diagrammatic and
does not reflect final
locations
Decision
Information Kiosk, Map Mileage Information
Confirmation
Annabel Lake
Lake
Cecilia
BR 3
BR 1
Shops At
Bishop
Ranch
Marriott
Sports
City Hall Basement
City Center
San Ramon Regional Medical Center
Dorris Eaton School
Post Office
Community
Center
BR 2600
BR 9
BR 15
BR 12
BR 11 PG&E Learning
Center
Crow Canyon
Commons
BR 7
BR 8
BR 6
Toyota
Motor
Sales
Iron Horse Middle School Library
Crow Canyon road
Bollinger Canyon Road
Executive Parkway
Norris Canyon Road
Bishop Drive
Iron Horse Trail
Alcosta Boulevard
Figure 34: Proposed Signage Locations
Chevron
Marketplace

CENTRAL PARK

TRANSIT
CENTER

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
66 | Walking District Goals & Guidelines
WAYFINDING | SIGNAGE TYPES
Directional signage confirms the route and is located where a decision to continue forward or turn is needed.

Playful signage can build brand awareness and share metrics on project progress and benefits.

Bishop Ranch’s existing walking path signage provides information on trail distances and route opportunities.

Map signage can be incorporated on different scales of signage from kiosks to directional.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Walking District Goals & Guidelines | 67
WAYFINDING | SIGNAGE TYPES
Directional signage incorporated into paving can be playful and visually interesting.

Signage should indicate direction to walking areas as well as to retail, dining, civic, and recreation areas to support uses within the Walking District.

Locational maps, QR codes, and apps should be easy to use and share information on distances, routes, and community destinations.

The logo and branding for San Ramon’s walking areas can layer into other regional and community wayfinding elements.
544
2:15 1.8
MI
10,000

SAN RAMON WALKS
TOTALS
CALORIES BURNED Walking District
health tip,
connection to a
local business,
route suggestion
on, current GPS location, etc.

STEPS
TIME

DISTANCE WALKED
Closest Bike
Share Location

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
69 Chapter Title
Text Moving forward requires public/private partnerships and coordination with private landholders to achieve the vision for the Walking District.

Implementation

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
70 | Implementation

IMPLEMENTATION ROLES
Ownership
The development of this plan was an effort co-led by
the Planning Services Division (Planning) within the
Community Development Department and the Parks &
Community Services (PCS) Department with significant
input from stakeholders who would be looked to for
partnerships to implement many of the concepts.

Implementation of the Plan’s vision will also be a shared responsibility, with each Department having a different area of focus. Planning reviews new development
applications and provides guidance in accordance with
State and Federal laws to implement City policies and
direct the physical development of San Ramon and the
vision articulated in the General Plan. As it relates to the Walking District Plan, when new projects come forward,
Planning is responsible for reviewing applications and
working with applicants to align project outcomes with
the vision described in the Walking District Plan where feasible. The goals and guidelines of the Plan may also be incorporated in updates of the City’s General Plan and related Specific Plans as appropriate.

The PCS Department provides recreation facilities, events, and programming for the community. It oversees two
divisions: programming and operations. For the Walking
District Plan, PCS will lead implementation of opportunities such as signage and branding, programming walking
events, promoting the Walking District, and incorporating arts and cultural programming. PCS also oversees
recommended connections to City-owned park facilities,
such as Central Park. Achieving the Plan’s vision requires continued cooperation between both departments and
each should provide coordinated updates to their advisory commissions on an annual basis to track progress toward achieving the desired outcomes.

The right-of-way is limited throughout much of the project area, meaning that new development projects and public/private partnerships are needed to implement desired improvements.

As represented on the ownership map on the following page, publicly-owned lands within the project area are limited to mainly the right-of-way and Central Park/City Hall/Iron Horse Middle School areas. The school district has some restrictions on public use of their outdoor spaces during school hours. The size/width of the right-of-way, terrain, and existing trees also limit opportunities to widen walkways or to set walkways back from the curb to provide a buffer.

The key takeaway from this assessment is that the public right-of-away alone is not enough to implement the desired changes to enhance walkability. Public/private partnerships and incorporating changes as part of new development projects are required. These findings also mean that timing of improvements is also not within the City’s purview. Some projects can be led by the City, but the majority of projects require partnerships with private or other public entities. Therefore, it is in the City’s interests to take advantage of opportunities with planned projects that can enhance walkability. It is recognized that the Plan represents a vision for infrastructure improvement and that final design and implementation of enhancements may vary as individual projects are proposed and project details are developed.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Implementation | 71
Project study area I-680
0 0.25mi
Iron Horse Trail (IHT)
(County-Owned Land, Managed by
East Bay Regional Parks District)
Private Ownership
Walking District Pathways and
Connectors (Ownership Varies)
Central Park (Public Ownership)
Note: Map is
diagrammatic and
does not reflect
surveyed property
boundary lines.

Annabel Lake
BR 3
BR 1
Chevron
Shops At
Bishop
Ranch
Marriott
Marketplace
Sports
Basement
City Hall
City Center
San Ramon Regional Medical Center
Dorris Eaton School
Post Office
Community Center

CENTRAL PARK

TRANSIT
CENTER
BR 2600
BR 9
BR 15
BR 12
PG&E Learning BR 11
Center
Crow Canyon
Commons
BR 7
BR 8
BR 6
Toyota
Motor
Sales
Iron Horse Middle School Library
Crow Canyon road
Bollinger Canyon Road
Executive Parkway
Norris Canyon Road
Bishop Drive
Iron Horse Trail
Alcosta Boulevard

IMPLEMENTATION ROLES
Figure 35: General Private/Public Ownership Designations Lake
Cecilia

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
72 | Implementation

IMPLEMENTATION OPPORTUNITIES
Implementation Opportunities
Partnerships, either with other public agencies or with private development, are needed to achieve many of
the desired infrastructure changes discussed in this Plan.

Opportunities to implement the guidelines is organized
into two primary categories, and each primary category
has two sub-categories. Primary categories include
opportunities led by public agencies and opportunities led by private development. Further sub-categories include:

City-led opportunities, collaborations with other public entities (such as East Bay Regional Parks District and the County), public/private partnerships, and projects that may occur with new development or redevelopment.

Opportunities Led by Public Agencies
Implementation of the opportunities below can be
influenced by the City and its public partners. As shown in Figure 36, opportunities led by the City and its public partners were ranked by community members during the
public outreach process.

A number of ranked opportunities are currently in progress, others have plans in place, and some can be led by the
City to keep momentum moving forward to achieve the
vision for a pedestrian-focused community. Opportunities that can be City-led, that do not involve significant
infrastructure changes within the right-of-way, can
leverage existing momentum, and are less than $250,000
in implementation dollars could be short term-wins.

Longer term efforts may include opportunities that
are dependant on partnering with other agencies and
where significant funding dollars, planning, and design is required. In addition, as City roadway projects come online within the project area, the City can evaluate options to narrow travel lanes and turn lanes to provide space for bike lanes and to widen adjacent walkways.

Figure 36: Webinar Polling Feedback from the Public on Ranking Potential Projects Rank the potential City and City/Other Public Entities projects in order of importance (1 most important to 5 least important)
Enhance IHT connection from
adjacent areas (e.g. Central Park)
Enhance IHT by widening and separating “rolling”
uses from “walking and running” uses
Provide shade along IHT
Provide seating along IHT
Provide additional seating in Central Park near
the Iron Horse Trail (IHT)(City project)

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Implementation | 73

IMPLEMENTATION OPPORTUNITIES
City-led Opportunities
• Develop digital Walking District mapping and
collateral to promote walking in the Walking District
as part of the City’s parks, trails, and open space
experiences (Ongoing)
• Program walking events in the Walking District
(Ongoing)
• Incorporate art and interactive elements into the
Walking District (Ongoing)
• Review related project applications for opportunities to achieve the vision set forth in the Plan (Ongoing)
• Reflect implementation of the Walking District Plan as part of the General Plan 2040 Policy Update
• Provide annual progress updates on implementation
of the Walking District vision as part of the General
Plan Annual Report (Ongoing)
• Complete the logo and brand for San Ramon Walks
(Timing: 1-5 Years)
• Incorporate signage on City properties and right-ofway (Timing: 1-5 Years) • Increase interactive displays in Central Park areas
(Timing: 1-5 Years)
• Provide additional seating and shade in Central Park
near the Iron Horse Trail (Timing: 1-5 Years)
• Narrow travel lanes and turn lanes to provide space
for bike lanes and widening adjacent walkways
(Timing: More than 10 Years or In Parallel with
Redevelopment of Adjacent Private Properties)
The Iron Horse Trail overcrossing for Bollinger Canyon Road has design underway and construction is scheduled for 2022.

Collaborations with other Public Entities
• Develop Iron Horse Trail overcrossing of Bollinger
Canyon Road (Timing: Design In Progress,
Implementation Scheduled for 2022)
• Develop Iron Horse Trail overcrossing of Crow Canyon
Road (Timing: More than 10 Years)
• Enhance Iron Horse Trail connections from adjacent
areas (e.g., Central Park) (Timing: 5-10 Years)
• Enhance Iron Horse Trail by widening and separating
“rolling” uses from “walking and running” uses (Timing:
5-10 Years)
• Provide seating along Iron Horse Trail (Timing: NearTerm) • Provide shade along Iron Horse Trail (Timing: 5-10
Years)

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
74 | Implementation
Opportunities Associated with Private Development
Many of the opportunities for enhancing walkability are efforts that are outside of the City’s purview. Although highly desirable and supported by the community, their
timing will be primarily determined by the market and
other factors influencing private development.

Stakeholders owning property in the Walking District have shown support for helping implement the guidelines, but timing will be driven by project applicants. Project budgets and physical constraints will also be constraints for
implementation of the following opportunities.

Public/Private Partnerships
• Provide public art
• Provide wayfinding signage
• Provide mapping and digital resources for loops and
routes
• Provide supporting amenities
• Incorporate interactive displays
0 200’ 400’ 800’

CAMINO RAMON

I R O N H O R S E R E G I O N A L T R A I L P E D E S T R I A N B R I D G E

CITY CENTER

THE SHOPS AT

BISHOP RANCH

EXECUTIVE PARKWAY
I-680

BIS H O P D R I V E

S U NSET DRIVE

BOLLINGER CANYON ROAD

CITY CENTER

TRANSIT
CENTER

ANNABEL LAKE
LAKE

CECILIA
BR 3A BR 1A
BR 2600

PARKWAY

PARK PATHS

SIDEWALKS

PEDESTRIAN STREET

COMMUNITY AMENITIES

MASTER PLAN AREA

PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
* *
*NOTE: Final alignment of pedestrian paths subject to revision and refinement.

NOVEMBER 22, 2019
CIRCULATION AND ACCESS - Pedestrian & Bicycle Circulation Convenient neighborhood and amenity access via walking and biking The scale of the mixed-use area encourages increased
personal mobility - walking and biking, along with electric scooters and other new forms of individual transport – for a more active, connected and engaged community. The
scale of the internal streets with equity between vehicles, bicycles and pedestrian use provide a more human scale
lhd kl
Ramon, Executive Parkway and Bishop Drive physically
and visually link all the neighborhoods together for
pedestrians and cyclists. Public pedestrian access through the mid-building lobbies will be accommodated to
provide additional open circulation between the BR2600
neighborhoods, to improve access for residents, office
kd lkhbl k
a
a
a
a
I
a
Project plans, such as the City Center Master Plan, offer opportunities to leverage new development for enhancements to the built walking environment. The City Center Master Plan incorporates the principles discussed in this plan and works to further diversify uses and provide additional reasons for people to walk rather than drive to destinations.

Graphic from the 2019 Bishop Ranch City Center Mixed-Use Master Plan

IMPLEMENTATION OPPORTUNITIES

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Implementation | 75
Figure 37: Webinar Polling Feedback from the Public on Ranking Potential Projects Projects That, Depending on Site Constraints, May
Occur With New Development or Redevelopment
• Widen walkways
• Separate walkways from road
• Provide additional amenities (e.g., seating, lighting, drinking fountains) as part of new development and
associated park areas
Rank the potential Public and Partnership and New/Redevelopment-Driven projects in order of importance (1 most important to 5 least important) Separate walkways from road (With
New Development as Conditions
Allow)
Widen walkways (With New
Development as Conditions Allow)
Provide wayfinding signage
(Public/Private Partnership)
Provide public art (Public/
Private Partnership)

IMPLEMENTATION OPPORTUNITIES

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
76 | Implementation
Achieving the full vision of the Walking District Plan
requires continued coordination and partnership with
private developers as new projects come forward.

Although some infrastructure projects will be moved
forward as part of new development applications, others may be led by the City or occur as partnerships between the City and other public agencies. The Bollinger Canyon overcrossing and improved connections between Central
Park and the Iron Horse Trail are, respectively, examples of a collaborative project currently underway and another public agency partnership project that could move
forward independent of private development.

Possible funding sources for projects led by the City or other public agencies include local, state, and federal funding programs. Significant pedestrian infrastructure projects are often funded through a combination of
funding strategies, including ballot measures, City General Funds, developer-funded projects, and State and federal grants.

Local funds may need to be used to provide matching
dollars required by grant programs and staff resources
are needed to develop applications and manage awarded
funds. The primary purpose for each funding program
varies. Similarly, restrictions may exist, or pedestrian improvements may be eligible, but not be competitive
unless they are part of a larger project. Significant
regional projects such as the future Crow Canyon
overcrossing may be an attractive grant candidate
because it serves both local and regional network goals.

The funding sources summarized in this section represent sources that support pedestrian and urban greening
projects. The summary is not an exhaustive list, and
additional sources are available for related active
transportation projects, such as bicycle and transit
infrastructure, and for public art projects. In addition to programming projects into the City’s Capital Improvement Program, the City should continue leveraging
development-driven projects to implement the vision of
the Walking District Plan.

Potential Funding Sources
• General Fund & Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
– The utilization of existing tax dollars for projects. This often comes through the CIP budget process. This can
be a primary source for many smaller projects and
improvements but usually does not fund larger, more
expensive amenities.
• Contra Costa Measure J for Pedestrian, Bicycle, and
Trail Facilities – One and a half percent of sales tax
revenues are for construction of pedestrian and
bicycle facilities including regional trails throughout Contra Costa. Two-thirds of the funds are to complete
projects in the Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian
Plan. One third of the funds are to be allocated to
the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) for the
development and rehabilitation of paved regional
trails. EBRPD is to spend its allocation equally in each subregion.
• Contra Costa Measure J for Livable Communities
– Five percent of sales tax revenues are to be used
to implement specific transportation projects that
encourage the use of alternatives to the single
occupant vehicle such as: pedestrian, bicycle and
streetscape facilities, traffic calming and transit
access improvements. Allocations are subject to
compliance with the County’s Growth Management
Program. Competitive among County’s jurisdictions.

FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Implementation | 77
The program is intended to support local efforts to
achieve more compact, mixed-use development, and
development that is pedestrian-friendly or linked
into the overall transit system. The program will fund
specific transportation projects that encourage the
use of alternatives to the single occupant vehicle
and promote walking. Typical investments include
pedestrian, bicycle, and streetscape facilities, traffic calming and transit access improvements. Both
planning grants and specific transportation capital
projects may receive funding under this program.
• Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity, or RAISE Discretionary Grant program,
previously known as the Better Utilizing Investments
to Leverage Development (BUILD) and Transportation
Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER)
Discretionary Grants – Major infrastructure projects
such as the Bollinger Canyon or Crow Canyon
overcrossings. Highly competitive (at the national
level) for capital projects to fund projects that have a significant local or regional impact.
• AmericaWalks Community Change Grants – Awarded
to innovative, engaging, and inclusive programs
and projects that create change and opportunity for
walking and movement at the community level.
• One Bay Area Grant – Administered by Contra
Costa Transportation Authority, the program guides
distribution of federal transportation funding from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to integrate
the program with California’s climate statutes and
Sustainable Communities Strategy. Infrastructure
projects include bikeways, crossing improvements, and
first/last mile projects that reduce vehicle trips. Funds pedestrian and bicycle improvements and streetscape
enhancements, but most projects must be in a Priority
Development Area or have a connection to a Priority
Development Area.

FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES
• Active Transportation Program (ATP) – Dedicated
to increasing bicycling and walking in California.

Funds bike and pedestrian infrastructure projects,
educational and promotional efforts, safe routes to
school projects, and active transportation planning.

Include infrastructure projects, education and
encouragement activities. There are two programs,
a State program administered by Caltrans and a
regional program administered by the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission. Both are competitive.
• Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ) – Funds
projects and programs that contribute to attainment
of national air quality standards. Projects must
reduce air pollution and be included in the Regional
Transportation Plan.
• Highway Safety Improvement Program – Geared
towards projects that reduce traffic fatalities, and
highly competitive statewide. Could be considered for
pedestrian crossings for safety-related improvements.
• Community Development Block Grants – Allocates
annual grants to cities and urban counties to develop
viable communities by providing decent housing,
a suitable living environment, and opportunities
to expand economic opportunities, principally for
low- and moderate- income persons. Bicycle and
pedestrian facilities are eligible uses of these funds. • Sustainable Communities Program – The Strategic
Growth Council is authorized to fund land-use,
housing, transportation, and land preservation
projects to support infill and compact development
that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Projects that
facilitate compact development, including pedestrian
infrastructure and amenities, with neighborhood scale
impacts are eligible. Available to government agencies
and institutions (including local government, transit
agencies and school districts), developers and nonprofit organizations. Pedestrian, bicycle, and crossing improvements, especially those identified in Specific
Plans, are considered.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
78 | Implementation
• Local Transportation Fund Transportation
Development Act – Also known as the Local
Transportation Fund (LTF), funds are used by cities
for the planning and construction of bicycle and
pedestrian facilities.
• Urban Greening Program – The Urban Greening
Program, funded by the Greenhouse Gas Reduction
Fund (GGRF), continues the legacy of other California
Natural Resources Agency’s programs but with a
specific focus of achieving greenhouse gas reductions.

Consistent with AB 32, the Urban Greening Program
will fund projects that reduce greenhouse gases by
sequestering carbon, decreasing energy consumption
and reducing vehicle miles traveled, while also
transforming the built environment into places that
are more sustainable, enjoyable, and effective in
creating healthy and vibrant communities. Complete
Green Streets and projects that expand or improve
the usability of existing active transportation routes
(e.g., walking or bicycle paths) or create new active
transportation routes that are publicly accessible by
walking are eligible.
• Urban and Community Forestry Program – Multiple
grant programs supported by the Urban and
Community Forestry Program will fund tree planting,
tree inventories, urban wood and biomass utilization,
blighted urban lands improvements, and leading
edge work that advances the goals and objectives
of supporting healthy urban forests and reducing
greenhouse gas emissions.
• Transformative Climate Communities – Administered
by the Strategic Growth Council and Department
of Conservation, the program funds community-led
development and infrastructure projects that achieve
major environmental, health, and economic benefits
in disadvantaged communities. Urban greening for
pedestrian facilities are eligible.
• Business Improvement Districts – Pedestrian
improvements can often be included as part of
larger efforts of business improvement and retail
district beautification. Similar to benefit assessments, Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) collect levies on businesses in order to fund area-wide improvements
that benefit businesses and improve access for
customers. These districts may include provisions
for pedestrian improvements such as amenities,
sidewalk improvements, and pedestrian crossing
enhancements.
• Property Taxes and Bonds – Cities and counties can
sell bonds to pay for bikeways, pedestrian facilities, as well as any amenities related to these facilities. Twothirds of voters in that jurisdiction must vote to levy property taxes to repay the bonds.
• Impact Fees and Developer Mitigation – Impact fees
may be assessed on new development to pay for
transportation projects, typically tied to vehicle trip generation rates and traffic impacts generated by a
proposed project. A developer may reduce the number
of trips (and hence impacts and cost) by paying for onor off-site bikeway improvements that will encourage residents to bicycle rather than drive. In-lieu parking fees may also be used to contribute to the construction of new or improved bicycle parking facilities.

Establishing a clear nexus or connection between
the impact fee and the project’s impacts is critical
in avoiding a potential lawsuit. Local jurisdictions
have the option to create their own impact fee and
mitigation requirements.
• Benefit Assessment Districts – Sidewalks and
related facilities can be funded as part of a local
benefit assessment district. However, defining the
boundaries of the benefit district may be difficult since the bikeways will have citywide or regional benefit.

Sidewalks, trails, intersection crossings and other
pedestrian improvements can also be funded through
benefit assessments.

FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

Implementation | 79
• New Construction – Future road widening
and construction projects are one means
of providing pedestrian improvements. To
ensure that roadway construction projects
provide appropriate measures where
needed, it is important that an effective
review process or ordinance is in place to
ensure that new roads meet the standards
and guidelines presented in this master
plan. Developers may also be required
to dedicate land toward the widening of
roadways in order to provide for enhanced
walkability.
• Partnerships – There is the potential of
developing equity partners for specific
projects. These could include other
neighboring cities, the County, the school
district, private companies, and health
care providers. There is often a limit on
the number of these types of partnerships
that can be established for a project due to
potential competing interests. Partnership
dollars received from other organizations
could be significant. A detailed partnership
assessment will be necessary to determine
a realistic level of funding for any project.
• Fundraising – A possible source of
capital funding could come from a
comprehensive fundraising campaign
in San Ramon. Contributions from local
businesses, private individuals and service
organizations could be included in the
outreach effort. To maximize this form of
funding, a private fundraising consultant
may be necessary. Generally, this is a
relatively low level of capital funding for
most projects.
• Foundations – There are foundations in
the greater Bay Area or nationally that
could be capital funders for significant
pedestrian facilities or arts and cultural
programming within the Walking District.

Reaching out to these foundations to
determine their level of interest, the key
amenities that they would support, and
other project requirements for possible
funding is important. It should be expected
that there will be a relatively low level of
funded through foundations.
• Sponsorships – The establishment of
sponsorships for different programs
as well as funding for different aspects
of promoting the Walking District or
interactive art elements within the Walking
District is possible. The City can solicit
corporate/local business sponsors who
are willing to pay for marketing, signage,
facility naming rights etc, generating funds
to support the Walking District. Sponsors
can also be chosen to support related
events or programs.
• User Fees – Bicycle lockers and automated
bicycle parking could be paid for with a
user fee that can be utilized for pedestrian
and bicycle programs and infrastructure.
• Parking Meter Revenues – Cities can
fund various improvements through
parking meter revenues. The ordinance
that governs the use of the revenues
would specify eligible uses. Cities have
the option to pass ordinances that specify
bicycle or pedestrian facilities as eligible
expenditures.

FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES
Walk San Ramon!
The Walking District Plan represents a bold
vision for a pedestrian-oriented city core.

It advances walkability and sets for the
goals and guidelines through which a safe,
comfortable, and interesting pedestrian
realm can be established. Private property
owners and stakeholders support the
vision and have expressed strong desires
to see it implemented through both public
and private projects. As the City continues
forward, both Planning and the Parks
& Community Services Department will
annually track and report progress.

As Walk San Ramon takes hold, the design
approach behind the Walking District’s
inviting, vibrant, and community-oriented
network can spread throughout the city as
it continues to improve connections and
celebrate its people and places.

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :
80 | Implementation

SAN RAMON WALKING

DISTRICT PLAN

10.1.a
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: A: San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines, January 2022 (2022-022 :

San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines Errata January 2022

Page 1 of 6 ends

San Ramon Walking District Plan Errata
The following are revisions to the San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines. These revisions are minor modifications and clarifications to this document and do not change the overall content of the document. The revisions are listed by page number. All additions to the text are underlined (underlined) and all deletions from the text are stricken (stricken).

Chapter 3, Implementation Plan

Page 70 ends

The paragraphs have been revised to describe the roles of the Community Development Department and Parks & Community Services Department for plan implementation.

The development of this plan was an city-led effort co-led by the Planning Services Division (Planning) within the Community Development Department and the Parks & Community Services (PCS) Department with significant input from stakeholders who would be looked to for partnerships to implement many of the concepts. Implementation of the Plan’s vision will also be a shared responsibility, with each Department having a different area of focus. Planning reviews new development applications and provides guidance in accordance with State and Federal laws to implement City policies and direct the physical development of San Ramon and the vision articulated in in the General Plan. As it relates to the Walking District Plan, when new projects come forward, Planning is responsible for reviewing applications and working with applicants to align project outcomes with the vision described in the Walking District Plan where feasible. The goals and guidelines of the Plan may also be incorporated in updates of the City’s General Plan and related Specific Plans as appropriate.

The PCS Department provides recreation facilities, events, and programming for the community. It oversees two divisions: programming and operations. For the Walking District Plan, PCS will lead implementation of opportunities such as signage and branding, programming walking events, promoting the Walking District, and incorporating arts and cultural programming. PCS also oversees recommended connections to City-owned park facilities, such as Central Park. Achieving the Plan’s vision requires continued cooperation between both departments and each should provide coordinated updates to their advisory commissions on an annual basis to track progress toward achieving the desired outcomes.

The school district has some restrictions on public use of their outdoor spaces during school hours. The size/width of the right-of-way, terrain, and existing trees also limit opportunities to widen walkways or to set walkways back from the curb to provide a buffer.

Chapter 3, Implementation Plan

Page 73 ends

Additional opportunities with timing have been included.  Develop digital Walking District mapping and collateral to promote walking in the Walking District as part of the City’s parks, trails, and open space experiences (Ongoing)  Program walking events in the Walking District (Ongoing)

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: B: San Ramon Walking District Plan Errata, January 2022 (2022-022 : San Ramon Walking District) San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines Errata January 2022

Page 2 of 6 ends

 Incorporate art and interactive elements into the Walking District (Ongoing)  Review related project applications for opportunities to achieve the vision set forth in the Plan (Ongoing)
 Reflect implementation of the Walking District Plan as part of the General Plan 2040 Policy Update
 Provide annual progress updates on implementation of the Walking District vision as part of the General Plan Annual Report (Ongoing)
Chapter 3, Implementation Plan

Page 76 ends

Addition of potential funding sources for projects.

Achieving the full vision of the Walking District Plan requires continued coordination and partnership with private developers as new projects come forward. Although some infrastructure projects will be moved forward as part of new development applications, others may be led by the City or occur as partnerships between the City and other public agencies. The Bollinger Canyon overcrossing and improved connections between Central Park and the Iron Horse Trail are, respectively, examples of a collaborative project currently underway and another public agency partnership project that could move forward independent of private development.

Possible funding sources for projects led by the City or other public agencies include local, state, and federal funding programs. Significant pedestrian infrastructure projects are often funded through a combination of funding strategies, including ballot measures, City General Funds, developer-funded projects, and State and federal grants.

Although there are a variety of grant funding sources, it is recognized that programs are highly competitive and the selection criteria for the grants are often weighted toward disadvantaged communities, addressing safety issues, and removing gaps or barriers in the mobility network. Local funds may need to be used to provide matching dollars required by grant programs and staff resources are needed to develop applications and manage awarded funds. The primary purpose for each funding program varies. Similarly, restrictions may exist, or pedestrian improvements may be eligible, but not be competitive unless they are part of a larger project. Significant regional projects such as the future Crow Canyon overcrossing may be an attractive grant candidate because it serves both local and regional network goals.

The funding sources summarized in this section represent sources that support pedestrian and urban greening projects. The summary is not an exhaustive list, and additional sources are available for related active transportation projects, such as bicycle and transit infrastructure, and for public art projects. In addition to programming projects into the City’s Capital Improvement Program, the City should continue leveraging development-driven projects to implement the vision of the Walking District Plan.

Potential Funding Sources
General Fund & Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – The utilization of existing tax dollars for projects. This often comes through the CIP budget process. This can be a primary source for many smaller projects and improvements but usually does not fund larger, more expensive amenities.

Contra Costa Measure J for Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Trail Facilities – One and a half percent of sales tax revenues are for construction of pedestrian and bicycle facilities including regional trails

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: B: San Ramon Walking District Plan Errata, January 2022 (2022-022 : San Ramon Walking District) San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines Errata January 2022

Page 3 of 6 ends

throughout Contra Costa. Two-thirds of the funds are to complete projects in the Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. One third of the funds are to be allocated to the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) for the development and rehabilitation of paved regional trails. EBRPD is to spend its allocation equally in each subregion.

Contra Costa Measure J for Livable Communities – Five percent of sales tax revenues are to be used to implement specific transportation projects that encourage the use of alternatives to the single occupant vehicle such as: pedestrian, bicycle and streetscape facilities, traffic calming and transit access improvements. Allocations are subject to compliance with the County’s Growth Management Program. Competitive among County’s jurisdictions. The program is intended to support local efforts to achieve more compact, mixed-use development, and development that is pedestrian-friendly or linked into the overall transit system. The program will fund specific transportation projects that encourage the use of alternatives to the single occupant vehicle and promote walking. Typical investments include pedestrian, bicycle, and streetscape facilities, traffic calming and transit access improvements. Both planning grants and specific transportation capital projects may receive funding under this program.

Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity, or RAISE Discretionary Grant program, previously known as the Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) and Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) Discretionary Grants – Major infrastructure projects such as the Bollinger Canyon or Crow Canyon overcrossings. Highly competitive (at the national level) for capital projects to fund projects that have a significant local or regional impact.

AmericaWalks Community Change Grants – Awarded to innovative, engaging, and inclusive programs and projects that create change and opportunity for walking and movement at the community level.

One Bay Area Grant – Administered by Contra Costa Transportation Authority, the program guides distribution of federal transportation funding from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to integrate the program with California’s climate statutes and Sustainable Communities Strategy.

Infrastructure projects include bikeways, crossing improvements, and first/last mile projects that reduce vehicle trips. Funds pedestrian and bicycle improvements and streetscape enhancements, but most projects must be in a Priority Development Area or have a connection to a Priority Development Area.

Active Transportation Program (ATP) – Dedicated to increasing bicycling and walking in California.

Funds bike and pedestrian infrastructure projects, educational and promotional efforts, safe routes to school projects, and active transportation planning. Include infrastructure projects, education and encouragement activities. There are two programs, a State program administered by Caltrans and a regional program administered by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. Both are competitive.

Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ) – Funds projects and programs that contribute to attainment of national air quality standards. Projects must reduce air pollution and be included in the Regional Transportation Plan.

Highway Safety Improvement Program – Geared towards projects that reduce traffic fatalities, and highly competitive statewide. Could be considered for pedestrian crossings for safety-related improvements.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: B: San Ramon Walking District Plan Errata, January 2022 (2022-022 : San Ramon Walking District) San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines Errata January 2022

Page 4 of 6 ends

Community Development Block Grants – Allocates annual grants to cities and urban counties to develop viable communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and opportunities to expand economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderate- income persons. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities are eligible uses of these funds.

Sustainable Communities Program – The Strategic Growth Council is authorized to fund land-use, housing, transportation, and land preservation projects to support infill and compact development that reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Projects that facilitate compact development, including pedestrian infrastructure and amenities, with neighborhood scale impacts are eligible. Available to government agencies and institutions (including local government, transit agencies and school districts), developers and non-profit organizations. Pedestrian, bicycle, and crossing improvements, especially those identified in Specific Plans, are considered.

Local Transportation Fund Transportation Development Act – Also known as the Local Transportation Fund (LTF), funds are used by cities for the planning and construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

Urban Greening Program – The Urban Greening Program, funded by the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF), continues the legacy of other California Natural Resources Agency’s programs but with a specific focus of achieving greenhouse gas reductions. Consistent with AB 32, the Urban Greening Program will fund projects that reduce greenhouse gases by sequestering carbon, decreasing energy consumption and reducing vehicle miles traveled, while also transforming the built environment into places that are more sustainable, enjoyable, and effective in creating healthy and vibrant communities. Complete Green Streets and projects that expand or improve the usability of existing active transportation routes (e.g., walking or bicycle paths) or create new active transportation routes that are publicly accessible by walking are eligible.

Urban and Community Forestry Program – Multiple grant programs supported by the Urban and Community Forestry Program will fund tree planting, tree inventories, urban wood and biomass utilization, blighted urban lands improvements, and leading edge work that advances the goals and objectives of supporting healthy urban forests and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Transformative Climate Communities – Administered by the Strategic Growth Council and Department of Conservation, the program funds community-led development and infrastructure projects that achieve major environmental, health, and economic benefits in disadvantaged communities. Urban greening for pedestrian facilities are eligible.

Business Improvement Districts – Pedestrian improvements can often be included as part of larger efforts of business improvement and retail district beautification. Similar to benefit assessments, Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) collect levies on businesses in order to fund area-wide improvements that benefit businesses and improve access for customers. These districts may include provisions for pedestrian improvements such as amenities, sidewalk improvements, and pedestrian crossing enhancements.

Property Taxes and Bonds – Cities and counties can sell bonds to pay for bikeways, pedestrian facilities, as well as any amenities related to these facilities. Two-thirds of voters in that jurisdiction must vote to levy property taxes to repay the bonds.

Impact Fees and Developer Mitigation – Impact fees may be assessed on new development to pay for transportation projects, typically tied to vehicle trip generation rates and traffic impacts generated by a proposed project. A developer may reduce the number of trips (and hence impacts and cost) by

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: B: San Ramon Walking District Plan Errata, January 2022 (2022-022 : San Ramon Walking District) San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines Errata January 2022

Page 5 of 6 ends

paying for on- or off-site bikeway improvements that will encourage residents to bicycle rather than drive. In-lieu parking fees may also be used to contribute to the construction of new or improved bicycle parking facilities. Establishing a clear nexus or connection between the impact fee and the project’s impacts is critical in avoiding a potential lawsuit. Local jurisdictions have the option to create their own impact fee and mitigation requirements.

Benefit Assessment Districts – Sidewalks and related facilities can be funded as part of a local benefit assessment district. However, defining the boundaries of the benefit district may be difficult since the bikeways will have citywide or regional benefit. Sidewalks, trails, intersection crossings and other pedestrian improvements can also be funded through benefit assessments.

New Construction – Future road widening and construction projects are one means of providing pedestrian improvements. To ensure that roadway construction projects provide appropriate measures where needed, it is important that an effective review process or ordinance is in place to ensure that new roads meet the standards and guidelines presented in this master plan. Developers may also be required to dedicate land toward the widening of roadways in order to provide for enhanced walkability.

Partnerships – There is the potential of developing equity partners for specific projects. These could include other neighboring cities, the County, the school district, private companies, and health care providers. There is often a limit on the number of these types of partnerships that can be established for a project due to potential competing interests. Partnership dollars received from other organizations could be significant. A detailed partnership assessment will be necessary to determine a realistic level of funding for any project.

Fundraising – A possible source of capital funding could come from a comprehensive fundraising campaign in San Ramon. Contributions from local businesses, private individuals and service organizations could be included in the outreach effort. To maximize this form of funding, a private fundraising consultant may be necessary. Generally, this is a relatively low level of capital funding for most projects.

Foundations – There are foundations in the greater Bay Area or nationally that could be capital funders for significant pedestrian facilities or arts and cultural programming within the Walking District.

Sponsorships – The establishment of sponsorships for different programs as well as funding for different aspects of promoting the Walking District or interactive art elements within the Walking District is possible. The City can solicit corporate/local business sponsors who are willing to pay for marketing, signage, facility naming rights etc, generating funds to support the Walking District.

Sponsors can also be chosen to support related events or programs.

User Fees & Rentals – Bike rental programs and fees for bicycle lockers and automated bicycle parking can be utilized for pedestrian and bicycle programs and infrastructure.

Walk San Ramon! (In Sidebar Callout)
The Walking District Plan represents a bold vision for a pedestrian-oriented city core. It advances walkability and sets for the goals and guidelines through which a safe, comfortable, and interesting pedestrian realm can be established. Private property owners and stakeholders support the vision and have expressed strong desires to see it implemented through both public and private projects. As the

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: B: San Ramon Walking District Plan Errata, January 2022 (2022-022 : San Ramon Walking District) San Ramon Walking District Plan: Vision, Goals, & Guidelines Errata January 2022

Page 6 of 6 ends

City continues forward, both Planning and the Parks & Community Services Department will annually track and report progress.

As Walk San Ramon takes hold, the design approach behind the Walking District’s inviting, vibrant, and community-oriented network can spread throughout the city as it continues to improve connections and celebrate its people and places.

10.1.b
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: B: San Ramon Walking District Plan Errata, January 2022 (2022-022 : San Ramon Walking District)

San Ramon City CouncilFebruary 8, 2022

San Ramon City Council
February 8, 2022