City Council Finance Committee
December 11, 2023

City of San Ramon

FINANCE COMMITTEE
AGENDA
Mark Armstrong, Chair • Scott Perkins, Vice Chair
City Hall - Training Room, First Floor
7000 Bollinger Canyon Road
Regular Meeting
4:00 PM
December 11, 2023
AGENDA QUESTIONS:

PLEASE CALL THE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR AT (925) 973-2576

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. PUBLIC COMMENT
At this time, members of the public are encouraged to address the Committee on any item not already included on the agenda. Comments should not exceed three (3) minutes. No Committee action can be taken at this meeting on issues raised during public comment.

3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

3.1 Finance Committee - Regular Meeting - Nov 6, 2023 1:15 PM

4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS

5. NEW BUSINESS

5.1 Recommendation to the City Council Authorizing a Loan from the General Fund of $701,000 to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund (Fund 371), and Payment to Standard Aspen Wood Venture LP in the Amount of $4,948,387.13 from the Affordable Housing Trust Fund (Fund 371)
Report by Debbie Chamberlain, Community Development Director

5.2 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – FY 2022/23 Completed Project Budget Analysis
Report by Amy Amiri, Senior CIP Administrative Analyst

5.3 Draft San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update
Staff Report by Deborah Fehr, Senior Civil Engineer
2 Finance Committee Meeting – December 11, 2023

5.4 Contra Costa Transportation Authority Countywide SMART Signals Project Funding Agreement and Allocation to Cover Matching Fund Requirements for the One Bay Area, Cycle 3 Program Grant Award
Staff Report by Deborah Fehr, Senior Civil Engineer

6. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS

7. ADJOURNMENT
The next Finance Committee Meeting is scheduled for January 16, 2024 I hereby certify that the agenda was posted 72 hours before the noted meeting. To make a request for disability-related accommodation to participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office 48 hours in advance of the meeting at 925-973-2539 or [email protected].

Dated: December 7, 2023

ATTENDEE CONDUCT
There will be zero tolerance for any person addressing the Committee making profane, offensive and disruptive remarks, or engaging in loud, boisterous, or other disorderly conduct, that disrupts the orderly conduct of the public meeting. Specifically, it is important for all speakers to adhere to the following guidelines for participation in this meeting:
a. No profanity or obscenity
b. Refrain from personal threats or attacks.
c. Refrain from hateful epithets and demeaning language based on any person’s race, religion, sexual orientation, ethnicity, gender, or disability.
d. Respect all people that are present.

At the discretion of the Committee Chair, a speaker may forfeit speaking time for any of the following reasons:
a. Exceeding the allotted time to speak;
b. Yelling, screaming, or other behavior that renders this Committee unable to continue the meeting;
c. Excessive profanity or slander; Specific threats or “fighting words” that incite violence; or d. Speech that is outside the subject matter jurisdiction of the Committee or the specific agenda item in which you are speaking.

While the City of San Ramon ensures the First Amendment rights of its citizens, we do not accept nor endorse any offensive or hateful comments made during our meetings. The City of San Ramon celebrates the diversity of our community, and we strive to be a welcoming and open community for all.

MINUTES OF THE

CITY OF SAN RAMON FINANCE COMMITTEE
November 6, 2023

1. CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 1:16 PM.

Attendee Name Title Status Arrived
Mark Armstrong Chair Present
Scott Perkins Vice Chair Present
Roger Burton, Actuary, Precision Actuarial, Inc.

Candace Daniels, Finance Division Manager
Scott Koll, Deputy City Manager
Nicki MacPherson, Accounting Specialist
Diego Munoz, Accountant
Kelly Sessions, Administrative Services Director
Steven Spedowfski, City Manager

2. PUBLIC COMMENT

3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

3.1 Finance Committee - Regular Meeting - Oct 16, 2023 4:00 PM RESULT: ACCEPTED [UNANIMOUS]
AYES: Armstrong, Perkins

4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS

5. NEW BUSINESS

5.1 City of San Ramon Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) 75 Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB) Valuation Report Measured as of June 30, 2022 for Disclosures for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 Presentation by Roger Burton, Actuary, Precision Actuarial, Inc.

The Finance Committee accepted the report.

RESULT: REPORT RECEIVED

5.2 California Employer’s Benefit Trust (CERBT) for the Period Ending September 30, 2023
Report by Candace Daniels, Finance Division Manager
The Finance Committee accepted the report.

3.1 Packet Pg. 3
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Nov 6, 2023 1:15 PM (APPROVAL OF MINUTES) 2 Finance Committee Meeting – November 6, 2023
RESULT: REPORT RECEIVED

6. COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS
Committee members had nothing additional to report.

7. ADJOURNMENT
The next Finance Committee Meeting is scheduled for December 11, 2023.

3.1 Packet Pg. 4
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Nov 6, 2023 1:15 PM (APPROVAL OF MINUTES)

FINANCE COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 11, 2023
TO: Finance Committee/City Manager
FROM: Debbie Chamberlain, Community Development Director By: Debbie Chamberlain, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Recommendation to the City Council Authorizing a Loan from the General Fund of $701,000 to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund (Fund 371), and Payment to Standard Aspen Wood Venture LP in the Amount of $4,948,387.13 from the Affordable Housing Trust Fund (Fund 371).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the Finance Committee recommend to City Council the approval of a $701,000 loan from the General Fund to Fund 371, the Affordable Housing Trust Fund (AHTF), and recommend payment from the AHTF to Standard Aspen Wood Venture LP in the amount of $4,948,387.13.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
On October 26, 2021, the City Council, adopted a resolution supporting Aspen Wood’s California Debt Limit Allocation Committee application and a financial commitment of $10.5 million for the construction of 122 low-income senior apartments, and one manager unit. In December 2021, Aspen Wood was awarded bond financing through the California Municipal Finance Authority (“CMFA”). On March 8, 2022, the City Council adopted a resolution supporting issuance of revenue bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority in an amount not to exceed $45,000,000, to finance the acquisition, construction, improvement and equipping the Aspen Wood project. On May 25, 2022, due to rising interest rates and volatility in the Stock Market, the Aspen Wood project encountered a financial shortfall, and the City increased the loan amount by $520,000 to cover Building and Engineering Services fees, for a total commitment of $11,020,000. On July 7, 2022, the project closed escrow. Subsequently, due to overestimated impact fees and to avoid delays in closing, which would have resulted in increased project cost, the City Council on August 9, 2022, adopted Resolution 2022-117 approving the below modified payment schedule for the $11,020,000 Aspen Wood Affordable Housing Trust Fund Loan.

July 7, 2022 Payment $4,000,000
Final January 3, 2024 Payment $4,948,387.13
Deferred Development Impact and Building
and Engineering Services Fees
$2,071,612.87

5.1 Packet Pg. 5
Loan Total $11,020,000
Originally, the Aspen Wood commitment was structured to prevent the AHTF from going negative with payments made following receipt of Faria Neighborhood 5 fees. However, although all building permits have been issued, with rising interest rates, homes sales slowed and fee payments delayed, such that the necessary funds have not been received, necessitating the use of General Fund monies to make the loan payment.

As of December 1, 2023, the Affordable Housing Trust Fund has a balance of $4,247,593.75, requiring a loan of $701,000 from the General Fund to cover the payment Loan terms are that the loan will be repaid with simple interest each year on June 30 using all available fund balance in Fund 371 until the loan is paid in full. The interest rate charged will be the State’s most recently published monthly Pooled Money Investment Account (PMIA) rate during the month in which the loan is approved by the City Council. For example, the interest rate for a loan approved in November 2023 would be the published PMIA rate for the month of October 2023, which is

3.670%.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
The preliminary General Fund ending reserve balance for FY 2022-23 is $28.9 million, which is 53% of General Fund Operating Expenditures, plus the annual transfer amount from the General Fund to the Dougherty Valley Fund; these figures include an estimated increase to the General Reserves of $6.5 million pending outcome of the FY 2022-23 audit. After the $701,000 loan to the Housing Fund, the General Reserve fund balance is estimated to be $28.2 million or 52%, still well above the 36% General Fund Reserve Policy minimum.

Approval of the loan will increase the authorized budget for the Affordable Housing Trust Fund (Fund 371) to $4,948,594.

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Staff will forward the request to the City Council to consider authorization of a loan of $701,000 from the General Fund to Fund 371 and authorization of a payment to Standard Aspen Wood Venture LP in the amount of $4,948,387.13.

ATTACHMENT
A: Housing Fund Balance Sheet 12.1.23
B: Promissory Note (Standard Aspen Wood Venture LP)

5.1 Packet Pg. 6




  
 




  !"#$ " %!& % '(  )

*+( ,

-./
+0
(1 ,

 !
 234 567283 75 9'24 :'2/ %;! <72  =926 '<.28 :9 ,3 .9/ >7? 253 7< 34  %;!$ !  57<6#>72@ A$ BC" ; &D%A;&  %;!$ ! %  7# E .243 <435 .F7>?3 A$ ;C&BGA$D  %;!$ ! "  2943< 5E83H<4923 A$ &C$ A  %;!$ ! "% 2#E7=3.572> ,4.< 69=3< A$ &C $ A  49 7? < 34  A$ DC;G$ !%DAIB ?.7> ? 4 3<  %;!$ " G!& /3,9<.4 #69'<.283<59J A$ E!D&C$ A  49 7? .7> ? 4 3< A$ E!D&C$ A  :'2/>7? 253  %;!$ %"!$  3F 2' 5924 ? A$ E"C%! BG%A&$  %;!$ %"!&$ 3K, 2/.4'35924 ? A$ B;CD%IA;  %;!$ %B!$  :'2/>7?#:'2/>7? 253 A$ E;C%$! G &A "  49 7?:'2/>7? 253 A$ EDC&G !%DAIB  49 7? .7> ? 4 3<L :'2/>7? 253 A$ EDC;G$ !%DAIB  M 32/ 9: 3,9 4E 8 
 0N /

*+(C5

)M 5.1.a
Packet Pg. 7
Attachment: A: Housing Fund Balance Sheet 12.1.23 (4186 : Authorizing a Loan from the General Fund of 2525/029060-0155
17782933 -1-

PROMISSORY NOTE
July 6, 2022
FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Standard Aspen Wood Venture LP, a California limited partnership (“Borrower”), promises to pay to the CITY OF SAN RAMON, a California municipal corporation (the “City”), the principal sum of Seven Million Twenty Thousand Dollars ($7,020,000.00), plus accrued interest (if applicable), and other charges owing hereunder, or such lesser amount which shall from time to time be advanced by the City and owing hereunder pursuant to the terms of this Note.

Reference is made to the Deed of Trust securing this Note executed by Borrower in favor of the City, recorded against the Site in the Office of the Contra County Recorder on or about the date hereof, as may be amended from time to time (the “Deed of Trust”).

1. Interest. Interest shall accrue on the outstanding principal balance of this Note at the rate of zero and seventy-five one-hundredths percent (0.75%) per annum. Such interest shall be simple interest and shall not compound.

2. Advances. On the date of this Note, the City shall advance to Borrower the amount of Two Million Seventy-One Thousand Six Hundred Twelve and 87/100 Dollars ($2,071,612.87).

Such advance shall be deemed made in exchange for the City deeming certain development impact and inspection fees in the same amount as having been paid that are owed by Borrower to the City on or about the date hereof in connection with the development of the Property. On or before January 3, 2024, the City shall advance the remaining principal balance of Four Million Nine Hundred Forty-Eight Thousand Three Hundred Eighty-Seven and 13/100 Dollars ($4,948,387.13) to Borrower.

3. Repayment.
a. Any unpaid and outstanding amount of principal and accrued interest under this Note shall be due and payable on July 1, 2052 (the “Maturity Date”). No payments of any principal or interest under this Note shall be due prior to the Maturity Date. b. Borrower shall have the right to prepay all or any portion of this Note at any time without penalty.
c. Any payments made by Borrower in payment of this Note shall be applied in the following order: (i) first to the interest then accrued and due on the unpaid principal balance under this Note, and (ii) second to reduction of the principal balance of this Note. d. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, City may declare all obligations hereunder immediately due and payable if Borrower, without the City’s prior written consent, sells or conveys the Property. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any requisite consent of the City to (a) the exercise of any purchase option or right of first refusal contained or referenced in the limited partnership agreement of Borrower and to (b) the assumption without penalty of loan obligations by the purchasing entity and the release of Borrower from such obligations, shall not be unreasonably withheld. Subject to any such consent requirement, the

5.1.b
Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: B: Promissory Note (Standard Aspen Wood Venture LP) (4186 : Authorizing a Loan from the General Fund of $701,000 to the 2525/029060-0155
17782933 -2-
exercise of rights under any such agreement shall not constitute a default or accelerate maturity of this Note.

4. Default. Borrower shall be deemed to be in default of this Note in the event Borrower (a) fails to timely make a payment required by this Note within ten (10) days following the due date of any payment due hereunder; or (b) Borrower is in material default of any of the covenants, terms, or provisions of this Note or the Deed of Trust, and Borrower fails to cure such default under the terms of the applicable agreement within thirty (30) days following Borrower’s receipt of written notice from the City; provided, however, that, if cure cannot reasonably be effected within such thirty (30) day period, there shall be no default under this Section 4 so long as Borrower promptly commences cure and thereafter diligently prosecutes such cure to completion. In the event of a default, the entire amount of this Note that has been disbursed to Borrower and all accrued interest thereon shall become immediately due and payable.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, prior to declaring any default or taking any remedy permitted hereunder or under applicable law based upon an alleged default under this Note, the City shall give a written notice to the limited partner of Borrower, and such limited partner shall have thirty (30) days to cure such default. The City hereby agrees that any cure of any default made by any limited partner of Borrower shall be deemed to be a cure by Borrower and shall be accepted or rejected on the same basis as if made by Borrower.

5. Collection Costs; Attorneys’ Fees. If this Note becomes due and is not paid, Borrower shall pay all costs of collection, including, but not limited to, attorneys’ fees and all expenses incurred in connection with the protection or realization of the collateral securing the payment hereof incurred by the City on account of such collection, whether or not suit is filed hereon.

6. Waiver of Presentment, Etc. Borrower waives presentment, protest and demand, notice of protest, demand and dishonor and nonpayment of this Note and any and all other notices or matters of a like nature, and consent to any and all renewals and extensions near the time of payment hereof and agree further that at any time and from time to time without notice, the terms of payment herein may be modified or the security described in any documents securing this Note released in whole or in part, or increased, changed or exchanged by agreement between the City and any owner of the premises affected by said documents securing this Note, without in any way affecting the liability of any party to this Note or any persons liable or to become liable with respect to any indebtedness evidenced hereby.

7. Severability; Governing Law; Amendment. The unenforceability or invalidity of any provision or provisions of this Note as to any persons or circumstances shall not render that provision or those provisions unenforceable or invalid as to any other provisions or circumstances, and all provisions hereof, in all other respects, shall remain valid and enforceable. This Note has been executed and delivered by Borrower in the State of California and is to be governed and construed in accordance with the internal laws thereof. Neither this Note nor any term hereof may be waived, amended, discharged, modified, changed, or terminated orally; nor shall any waiver of any provision hereof be effective except by an instrument in writing signed by Borrower and the City.

5.1.b
Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: B: Promissory Note (Standard Aspen Wood Venture LP) (4186 : Authorizing a Loan from the General Fund of $701,000 to the 2525/029060-0155
17782933 -3-

8. No Waiver by City. No waiver of any breach, default, or failure of condition under the terms of this Note or the Deed of Trust or the obligations secured thereby shall be implied from any failure of the City to take, nor shall any delay be implied from any failure by the City in taking action with respect to such breach, default, or failure from any prior waiver of any similar or unrelated breach, default, or failure.

9. Usury. Notwithstanding any provision in this Note, the Deed of Trust, or other document securing same, the total liability for payment of any interest shall not exceed the limit imposed by applicable laws of the State of California.

10. Business Day. If the due date for any payment is not a business day, such due date shall be deemed for all purposes to fall on the next business day.

11. Subordination. The indebtedness evidenced by this Note is and shall be subordinate in right of payment to the prior payment in full of all amounts then due and payable (including, but not limited to, all amounts due and payable by virtue of any default or acceleration or upon maturity) with respect to any secured financing obtained by Borrower in connection with the development and operation of the Property, as well as any regulatory or covenant agreements associated therewith or with Borrower’s receipt of low income housing tax credits pursuant to Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In addition to, and not in limitation of the foregoing, the indebtedness evidenced by this Note is and shall be subordinate in right of payment to the prior payment in full of all amounts then due and payable (including, but not limited to, all amounts due and payable by virtue of any default or acceleration or upon maturity) with respect to (i) the indebtedness evidenced by the Note (as defined in that certain Multifamily Leasehold Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing (California) (Tax Exempt), by the Borrower in favor of the California Municipal Finance Agency, and assigned to E-W Services, Inc., a California corporation (“Funding Lender”)), in the original maximum principal amount of $28,342,943, executed by Borrower and payable to Funding Lender, and (ii) the indebtedness evidenced by the Note (as defined in that certain Multifamily Leasehold Deed of Trust, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing (California) (Taxable), by the Borrower in favor of East West Bank, a California banking corporation (“Taxable Lender,” and together with Funding Lender, “Senior Lender”)), in the original maximum principal amount of $17,006,113, executed by Borrower and payable to Taxable Lender, to the extent and in the manner provided in that certain Subordination and Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2022, between Senior Lender and the holder of this Note (the “Subordination Agreement”). The rights and remedies of the City and each subsequent holder of this Note shall be deemed, by virtue of such holder’s acquisition of this Note, to have agreed to perform and observe all of the terms, covenants and conditions to be performed or observed by the “Junior Lender” under the Subordination Agreement. The City further agrees that upon the maturity of any debt or obligation senior in priority to the Deed of Trust, the City shall subordinate this Note and the Deed of Trust to any new debt which is used to partially or fully repay said maturing senior debt or obligation.

12. Non-Recourse. Neither Borrower nor Borrower’s officers, partners, directors, employees or agents nor their respective members, managers, officers, partners, shareholders, directors, employees or agents shall have personal liability for the payment or performance of any

5.1.b
Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: B: Promissory Note (Standard Aspen Wood Venture LP) (4186 : Authorizing a Loan from the General Fund of $701,000 to the 2525/029060-0155
17782933 -4-
of Borrower’s obligations under this Note or the Deed of Trust. The City’s sole recourse shall be to realize against the collateral described in the Deed of Trust. [signatures follow]

5.1.b
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: B: Promissory Note (Standard Aspen Wood Venture LP) (4186 : Authorizing a Loan from the General Fund of $701,000 to the IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower and the City have executed this Note as of the date first above written.

BORROWER:

STANDARD ASPEN WOOD VENTURE LP,
a California limited partnership
By: Standard Aspen Wood Manager LP,
a California limited partnership,
its Administrative General Partner
By: Standard West Coast GP LLC,
a California limited liability company,
its General Partner
}�--·--- By: , , )
Name: Bradlef C. Martinson
Title: Authorized Representative
By: Housing On Merit XXII LLC,
a California limited liability company,
its Managing General Partner
By: Housing On Merit,
a California nonprofit public benefit corporation,
its Manager
CITY:

By:

Name: Jennifer Litwak
Title: Executive Director

CITY OF SAN RAMON,
a California municipal corporation
By: ___________ _
Name: _____________ _
Title: ______________ _
2525/029060-0155
17782933. -5-

5.1.b
Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: B: Promissory Note (Standard Aspen Wood Venture LP) (4186 : Authorizing a Loan from the General Fund of $701,000 to the IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower and the City have executed this Note as of the date first above written.

BORROWER:

STANDARD ASPEN WOOD VENTURE LP,
a California limited partnership
By: Standard Aspen Wood Manager LP,
a California limited partnership,
its Administrative General Partner
By: Standard West Coast GP LLC,
a California limited liability company,
its General Partner
By:

Name: Bradley C. Martinson
Title: Authorized Representative
By: Housing On Merit XXII LLC,
a California limited liability company,
its Managing General Partner
By: Housing On Merit,
a California nonprofit public benefit corporation,
its Manager
CITY:

By:

Name: J
Title:

CITY OF SAN RAMON,
a California municipal corporation
By: ___________ _
Name: _____________ _
Title: --------------
2525/029060-0155
I 7782933. -5-

5.1.b
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: B: Promissory Note (Standard Aspen Wood Venture LP) (4186 : Authorizing a Loan from the General Fund of $701,000 to the IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower and the City have executed this Note as of the date first above written.

BORROWER:

STANDARD ASPEN WOOD VENTURE LP,
a California limited partnership
By: Standard Aspen Wood Manager LP,
a California limited pattnership,
its Administrative General Partner
By: Standard West Coast GP LLC,
a California limited liability company,
its General Partner
By:

Name: Bradley C. Martinson
Title: Authorized Representative
By: Housing On Merit XXII LLC,
a California limited liability company,
its Managing General Partner
By: Housing On Merit,
a California nonprofit public benefit corporation,
its Manager
CITY:

By:

Name: Jennifer Litwak
Title: Executive Director

CITY OF SAN RAMON,
a Californ,j' municipal c�
rporati"6n---
// \ jJ,1/
/1! ;J"fj
" ' I I ' I By: 11 ll,/ '1 \1, Name:/Joe Gorton I\ '\
Title: t::ity Manager l \
I \I I
2525/029060-0155
I 7782933,6 a06i14122 -5-
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

N
Ti
ATTEST:

By:

Name: Christina Franco I
Title: City Clerk
'K.t?�o/L,<11D(1 t,)o

5.1.b
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: B: Promissory Note (Standard Aspen Wood Venture LP) (4186 : Authorizing a Loan from the General Fund of $701,000 to the

FINANCE COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 11, 2023
TO: Finance Committee/City Manager
FROM: Maria Fierner, Public Works Director
By: Brian Bornstein, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Program (CIP) – FY 2022/23 Completed Project Budget Analysis

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
During FY 2022/23, Capital projects that were completed are presented in this report to show the completed costs versus the approved budget. This report captures the annual accounting report of the completed projects during the previous fiscal year.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that the Finance Committee review the Completed Project Budget Analysis for the Capital Improvement Program for FY 2022/23 and provide comments.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Since the May 18, 2005 City Council Budget Workshop, staff has annually prepared an accounting report of the approved budget and the actual project costs for completed CIP projects for the previous fiscal year and presented it to the Finance Committee by the fall of each year.

This report provides a comparative analysis of the approved budget versus the actual costs for the Capital projects completed in FY 2022/23 as of October 31, 2023.

During the preparation of the Five-Year CIP 2010-2015, staff was asked to provide a summary of all projects that have been funded and their spent-to-date totals. Since then, this has also been provided annually with the Completed Project Budget Analysis. Attachment B provides a summary of all funded projects captured in the Five-Year CIP 2023-2028 along with project status updates.

As part of this staff report, staff will present a PowerPoint summarizing the completed projects and the costs to complete each project. Also highlighted are some of the projects that continue to roll over each year to better illustrate what was completed in FY 2022/23, although the budget in these projects rolls over into the following year.

5.2 Packet Pg. 15

FISCAL ANALYSIS
A total of 24 of the 74 projects were completed in FY 2022/23. Of the 74 projects, 24 are routine maintenance-related projects that continue year after year, and one has been deferred and/or reprogrammed to future years. The total project budget costs were $19,694,459; the total actual project costs were $15,951,522, resulting in savings between budget and actual of $3,742,937.

The largest savings came from the pavement project listed below:

Pavement Management 2022 Project (CIP 000005) - $2,558,342 The savings were primarily due to favorable bid pricing, having the concrete work for ADA ramps completed by a separate contractor, and making refinements to the overall scope of work.

The remaining funds have been returned to the original funding source (Gas Tax) for future programming.

Other savings upon project completion are as follows:

Citywide Bicycle Network Improvements & Enhancements Project - Phase 2 (CIP 905613) - $499,951
The savings were primarily due to favorable bid pricing. Part of the remaining funds have been returned back to the 2019 COP to be reappropriated to the San Ramon Olympic Pool and Aquatic Park Renovation Project (CIP 200006); the balance remaining in the Project will be used for future improvements and an alternate bid item location on Bollinger Canyon Road to Dougherty Road.

Citywide Intelligent Transportation System Upgrade - Implementation Project - Phase I and II (CIP 975594) - $432,842
The savings were primarily due to favorable bid pricing and MCI/Verizon doing a portion of the work on Bollinger Canyon Road near City Hall. The balance of the Project was funded by the Traffic Improvement Fund in the amount of $200,582. The unused remaining funds have been returned back to the original funding source (Traffic Improvement Fund) for future programming.

Ring & Rock Fountain Conversion Project (CIP 500001) - $76,815 The Project consisted of conversion of the Ring & Rock Fountain at Central Park to a landscaped and lighted area including a pergola and paved walkway. The savings were primarily due to favorable pricing and on-call contractors, as well as use of City staff to complete some of the work. The unused remaining funds have been returned back to the original funding source (City Beautification Fund).

Sidewalk Repairs 2020/2021 Project (CIP 4000001) - $57,169 The savings were primarily due to favorable bid pricing. The remaining funds have been reappropriated to the current Sidewalk Repairs 2022/2023 Project (CIP 400005).

The budget vs. actual costs for each completed project is more fully described in Attachment A.

5.2 Packet Pg. 16
The table below shows the breakdown of the project budget costs versus the actual project costs per fiscal year for the last 10 years through FY 2022/23:

FISCAL
YEAR
# OF

PROJECTS

COMPLETED
TOTAL
BUDGET
TOTAL
ACTUAL
2013/14 15 $15,469,452 $14,590,163
2014/15 24 $11,824,412 $10,481,574
2015/16 23 $12,994,479 $10,032,621
2016/17 13 $21,974,932 $20,238,670
2017/18 21 $10,957,898 $5,940,636
2018/19 19 $8,869,030 $8,433,850
2019/20 17 $9,249,040 $8,174,189
2020/21 16 $22,451,976 $19,873,177
2021/22 13 $15,277,368 $11,079,830
2022/23 24 $19,694,459 $15,951,522
All unspent funds are returned back to the original funding sources for reprogramming to future projects or remain in projects to address future improvements.

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Staff will revise the CIP Project Budget Analysis Report to incorporate comments from the Finance Committee into future reports. Staff will continue to update the report on an annual basis, after the end of each fiscal year.

ATTACHMENT
A: CIP Project Budget Analysis Report
B: Summary of All Funded Capital Projects 2023-2028
C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23

5.2 Packet Pg. 17
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Complete Project Budget Analysis
Fiscal Year 2021-2022
Project
No. Project Name
Project
Budget
Actual Project
Cost Savings
Funding
Source
Date
Accepted/
Completed Comments
5603 Bollinger Canyon Road Frontage
Improvements (Faria Preserve)
$500,000 $500,000 $0 Developer 9/12/2023 All work completed with roadway and landscape civil improvements accepted by City Council on September 12, 2023.
935404 Centralized Irrigation System Upgrade -
FY 21/22
$97,000 $64,753 $32,247 DVCSA / PDF 4/30/2023 All work completed, which included 2 controller upgrades and installations in the Dougherty Valley on Bollinger Canyon Road controllers E and F).

Unused funds to remain in project for future work.
905613 Citywide Bicycle Network Improvements &
Enhancements - Phase 2*
$1,010,000 $510,049 $499,951 COP 5/9/2023 All work completed, which included enhancements at Iron Horse Trail crossing at Montevideo Drive and Pine Valley Road; Deerwood Drive between Omega Road and Deerwood Road, and Alcosta Boulevard from Crow Canyon Road to Vera Cruz Drive; Bishop Drive from Executive Parkway to Norris Canyon Road; Bollinger Canyon Road from Dougherty Road (N) to Dougherty Road (S); Dougherty Road from Bollinger Canyon Road (N) to Bollinger Canyon Road (S); Broadmoor Drive from Alcosta Boulevard to Montevideo Drive; Fostoria Way from Iron Horse Trail to Camino Ramon; and Norris Canyon Road from Bollinger Canyon Road to Twin Creeks Drive. $200,000 of the funds reappropriated to CIP 200006 to complete the work, with remaining balance remaining in project for future work.
905613 Citywide Bicycle Network Improvements &
Enhancements - Phase 3*
$60,000 $60,000 $0 COP 3/28/2023 All work completed, which included facility improvements for Dougherty Road; Crow Canyon Road to Bollinger Canyon Road (N); and Bollinger Canyon Road from Canyon Lakes Drive to Dougherty Road (N). Unused funds will remain in project for future work.
500003 Citywide Dog Park Renovation and
Improvements
$100,000 $96,964 $3,036 PDF 3/17/2023 All work completed with the renovation of the surface to turf at the Bark & Ride Park. Unused funds will remain in project for use for future improvements.
915548 Citywide Drainage Infrastructure Repairs - K
(Crow Canyon/Deerwood Storm Drain
Repair) - Phase II
$550,000 $529,581 $20,419 CMF/DMF/COP 2/14/2023 All work completed, which included removal of failed culvert remnants and manhole, stabilized the outfall pipe and connect a new short section of culvert pipe and build a riprap apron at the new outfall and reconstruct with Engineered Streambed Material. Unused funds to remain in project for future work.
975594 Citywide Intelligent Transportation System
Upgrade - Implementation - Phase I
$338,800 $59,367 $279,433 TIF 6/30/2023 All work completed, which included connection of the Bollinger corridor to City Hall and created a virtual server, and MCI/Verizon installed fiber conduit within the MCI/Verizon Project where new conduit locations are listed in the ITS Master Plan. Unused funds remain in project for future work.
975594 Citywide Intelligent Transportation System
Upgrade - Implementation - Phase II
$1,740,000 $1,586,591 $153,409 COP 1/31/2023 All work completed, which included Bollinger Canyon Road between Talavera Drive and Albion Road and Dougherty Road from Crow Canyon Road to Bollinger Canyon Road. Unused funds will remain in project for future work.

ATTACHMENT A

5.2.a
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: A: CIP Project Budget Analysis Report (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Complete Project Budget Analysis
Fiscal Year 2021-2022
Project
No. Project Name
Project
Budget
Actual Project
Cost Savings
Funding
Source
Date
Accepted/
Completed Comments
300008 Deerwood Zone Improvements - Zone 8 $87,411 $81,441 $5,970 L&L Zone 8 6/30/2023 All work completed, which included irrigation controller and valve replacement within the zone and replacement of dead and missing shrubs along Deerwood Road between Omega Road and Deerwood Drive. Unused funds returned back to source (Zone 8).
5585 Faria Preserve Parkway $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $0 Developer 9/12/2023 All work completed with the roadway and landscaping civil improvements accepted by the City Council on September 12, 2023.
5622 Fostoria Way/Costco Driveway Traffic
Signal
$631,000 $631,000 $0 Developer 7/31/2023 All work completed, which included new traffic signal installation. Work was funded and completed by developer.
200009 Fuel Management System $85,000 $83,503 $1,497 ER 6/30/2023 All work completed, which included the purchase of Gasboy Energy Knowledge Operating System (EKOS) and hardware including pedestal, wireless nozzle readers, etc. Unused funds returned back to source (ER). 300017 Henry Ranch Improvements - Zone 17 $5,000 $4,157 $843 L&L Zone 17 6/30/2023 All work completed, which included tree removal and replacement along San Ramon Valley Boulevard. Unused funds returned back to source (Zone 17).
955516 Irrigation Booster Pump Installation -
FY 2021/22
$85,000 $77,551 $7,449 DVCSA 6/30/2023 All work complete, including equipment replacement at Arlington Park, booster pumps on Windemere Parkway at S. Bellingham Way and East Branch Parkway at Arlington Way. Remaining funds to remain in project for future repairs.
000005 Pavement Management - 2022 $7,434,243 $4,875,901 $2,558,342 GT/MJ / COP / RVIF
3/31/2023 All work is complete. Project savings were due to favorable bid pricing, as well as having the concrete ADA ramp work done by separate contractor.

Remaining funds returned back to source (GT).
5540 Purdue Road Extension (Faria Preserve
Parkway)
$823,132 $823,132 $0 Developer 1/10/2023 All work is complete, which included civil and landscape improvements.

Work was funded and completed by developer.
975481 Radar Speed Display Sign - FY 20/21 $31,000 $30,471 $529 TIF / Developer 12/31/2022 All work complete, which included unit on Davona Drive at Laramie Avenue installed by City; and unit southbound Bollinger Canyon Road approaching the City Limits, unit eastbound approaching Omega Road, and unit westbound Faria Preserve Parkway approaching Bollinger Canyon Road, which were all funded and installed by developer of Faria Preserve. Unused funds returned back to source (TIF).
925590 Recreation Program and Facilities
Equipment Replacement - FY 22/23
$31,000 $31,000 $0 ER 6/30/2023 All work complete, which included replacing Ridgeview Room chairs at Dougherty Station and Community Arts Center.
500001 Ring & Rock Fountain Conversion $348,097 $271,282 $76,815 CBF 6/1/2023 All work completed, which included new irrigation, landscape, wall lettering, up-lighting, pergola and new paver walkways. Unused funds returned back to source (CBF).

ATTACHMENT A

5.2.a
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: A: CIP Project Budget Analysis Report (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
Complete Project Budget Analysis
Fiscal Year 2021-2022
Project
No. Project Name
Project
Budget
Actual Project
Cost Savings
Funding
Source
Date
Accepted/
Completed Comments
5586 San Ramon Valley Blvd./Deerwood Road
Intersection Improvements
$350,000 $350,000 $0 Developer 1/31/2023 All work completed, which included median island modifications to provide greater left-turn capacity on eastbound Deerwood Road to northbound San Ramon Valley Boulevard as well as pavement improvements. Project was funded and completed by developer. 5461 San Ramon Valley Blvd./Faria Preserve
Parkway (formerly Purdue Road) Traffic
Signal
$350,000 $350,000 $0 Developer 2/28/2023 All work completed, which included new traffic signal installation. Work was funded and completed by developer.
400001 Sidewalk Repairs 2020/2021 $250,000 $192,831 $57,169 GT/MJ 7/25/2023 All work completed, and unused funds reappropriated to Sidewalk Repairs 2022/2023 Project (CIP 400005).
975526 Traffic Signals Improvements &
Enhancements - FY 22/23
$263,700 $217,884 $45,816 IMF 8/31/2023
All work completed including 2070 traffic signal controllers, conflict monitors, battery backup units and batteries, inverters, radar display unit, ethernet comnet switches, radar guns, pedestrian push button system and Rhythm processor. Unused funds to remain in project for future use. 300004 Vista San Ramon Zone Improvements -
Zone 4
$24,076 $24,064 $12 L&L Zone 4 6/30/2023 All work completed including mulch in medians along Woodview Terrace Drive. Unused funds returned back to source (L&L).

TOTALS: $19,694,459 $15,951,522 $3,742,937
*Project Budget includes multi-phased projects.

Fund Symbols:

AF: Alternative Funding: Grants, Child Care, GIS Mapping, etc.

COP: 2019 Certificate of Participation Debt Financing
DMF & CMF: Drainage Mitigation & Creek Mitigation Funds DVCSA: DV County Service Area M-29 Fund
GT/MJ: Gas Tax/Measure J & SB-1 Funds
GF: General Fund
IMF: Infrastructure Maintenance Fund
L&L: Landscape & Lighting District Zones
PCR: Planning Cost Recovery Fee
PDF: Park Development Fund
PEG Public, Educational, and Government Access Television Fund RVIF: Refuse Vehicle Impact Fee
SRVUSD San Ramon Valley Unified School District
TIF: Traffic Improvement Fund

ATTACHMENT A

5.2.a
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: A: CIP Project Budget Analysis Report (4168 : Completed CIP Projects)

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2023-28)
Project Expenditures
Totals through October 31, 2023
Project Name CIP
Authorized
Budget
Spent to Date
Comments
1 2023 Storm Damage Repairs 100001 $1,290,000 $16,527 Project includes work sediment removal at Norris Creek, damaged risers in water quality control ponds and creek bank damage repairs at Coyote, S. San Ramon and San Catanio Creeks.
2 Bent Creek Zone Improvements - Zone 7 300007 $176,352 $140,852 Project underway. 3 Bicycle Master Plan Update 000010 $88,000 $0 Project underway. 4 Bishop Ranch 6 Neighborhood Park (Bartlett Park) 5628 $4,500,000 $0 Project constructed and funded by Developer. In design phase. 5 Bollinger Canyon Rd. / Iron Horse Trail Bicycle Ped.

Overcrossing
905530 $29,597,279 $3,192,745 Construction underway with duration to last 18-24 months. 6 Bollinger Canyon Rd Widening (Alcosta/Canyon Lakes)
(C1.5)
905325 $1,789,980 $1,789,980 Temporary K-rail installed adjacent to path in 2013. Staff continuing to monitor roadway segment.
7 Canyon Lakes Zone Improvements - Zone 3 300003 $270,000 $178,395 Project underway. 8 Centralized Irrigation System Upgrade 935404 $1,169,588 $1,135,472 Annual project. No work scheduled for this year. 9 Circle E Zone Improvements - Zone 15 300015 $68,000 $51,234 Project underway. 10 City Facilities Floor Covering Replacement 925432 $546,740 $546,740 Olympic Pool Restroom tiles have been replaced; additional repairs to flooring surface will be completed with CIP 200006. Replaced wooden dance floor modules at SR Community Center, repaired floor in Police Department. Completed hardwood floor replacement at Iron Horse Gymnasium in August 2021 with cost shared with SRVUSD. No new work scheduled this FY.
11 City Facilities HVAC Duct Clean. & Equip.

Replacement
925425 $2,510,686 $2,382,596 Completed Senior Center and San Ramon Community Center duct cleaning. Completed San Ramon Library, City Hall, San Ramon Service Center, HVAC energy work at SR Olympic Pool and assessment of equipment condition, duct cleaning at DV Service Center and DV Aquatic Center. FY 23/24 work includes work at San Ramon Olympic Pool once building renovation is complete, and repairs as needed. 12 City Facilities Roof Covering Maintenance &
Replacement
925433 $894,791 $850,671 Annual project. SR Community Center Fiberglass Vault and minor emergency repairs completed. Olympic Pool maintenance shed roof completed. Replaced tarp at Mudd's building. Emergency repairs as needed.
13 City Signage Project 935465 $348,797 $299,628 Directional signs, signage at Police/Permit Center, instructional signage/historical signs at Forest Home Farms, and monolith entry signage at Windemere Parkway completed. Completed monuments at DVPAC and signage at DVAC and Forest Home Farms in FY 17/18.

Installed flag pole at Central Park at the corner of Alcosta Boulevard and Bollinger Canyon Road in May 2021. Monument at Crow Canyon Gardens on hold until details of Mudd's parcel are determined. No work scheduled this FY.
14 Citywide Aerial Mapping & GIS Support 945485 $269,843 $199,978 Ongoing project. Brightly (previously Facility Dude) software purchased and implemented; consultant hosting transfer completed; and drone purchased and staff trained to operate it. Continue to create GIS application and data links and additional enhancements as well as purchase of new AutoCAD software is on-going. Server migration to in house data servers is complete. Image servers setup. Continue to improve database and access.
15 Citywide Bicycle Network Improvements &
Enhancements
905613 $935,500 $742,593 Completed 22 miles of infrastructure including the installation of green bike lanes at conflict zones on Norris Canyon Road, San Ramon Valley Boulevard, and Bollinger Canyon Road; new bike lanes were installed on Executive Parkway. Received $25,000 TDA Grant for San Ramon Valley Boulevard work; sharrows on Montevideo from San Ramon Valley Boulevard to Alcosta Boulevard. Completed 20 miles of infrastructure with the improvements on Bollinger Canyon Road and Dougherty Road as part of Pavement Management 2022; and localized improvements at the Iron Horse Trail crossings at Pine Valley Road and Montevideo Drive. Additional work underway as part of Pavement Management 2023.
16 Citywide Dog Park Renovations and Improvements 500003 $150,000 $96,964 Completed conversion of DG surface to turf at Bark and Ride in FY 22/23. FY 23/24 work includes purchase and installation of amenities and play features to enhance existing dog parks.
17 Citywide Drainage Infrastructure Repair 915548 $3,265,805 $3,222,922 Repairs to Oak Creek and sediment removal on Norris Creek and Oak Creek; Bollinger Creek culvert repairs; access road repairs at Thunderbird Drive; manhole repair on Iron Horse Trail; and catch basin repairs on Dougherty Road are complete. Flood studies complete.

Repairs to culvert at Crow Canyon Road and Park Place Phase I and repairs at Belle Meade Drive completed in FY 16/17. Completed erosion repairs on MSE wall on Crow Canyon Road; S. San Ramon Creek at Cal High School, and S. San Ramon Creek at Golf Course, and Summit View Drive storm drain repairs; completed partial sediment removal on Norris Creek and Oak Creek culverts. Received PTAP funding for inventory study, and complete. Completed Mill Creek construction on October 14, 2022. Last year, completed 36" culvert repair on Crow Canyon and Deerwood. Additional sediment removal and miscellaneous repairs complete.
18 Citywide Electric Vehicle Charging Stations 200008 $325,000 $163,534 Contract executed with work to be completed by end of FY 23/24. New charging stations will be installed at City Hall (1) and Sports Park (3).

5.2.b
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: B: Summary of All Funded Capital Projects 2023-2028 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects)

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2023-28)
Project Expenditures
Totals through October 31, 2023
Project Name CIP
Authorized
Budget
Spent to Date
Comments
19 Citywide Exterior Painting & Sealing 925532 $499,595 $421,195 Annual project. Completed resealing of Pine Valley and Iron Horse Gymnasiums, repaired operable window, repaired and repainted Glass House, and painted and sealed Service Center building and warehouse.

Stucco painting at SR Olympic Pool will be done in FY 24/25 upon completion of CIP 200006. FY 23/24 work underway and includes Dryvit exterior lower trim painting at Alcosta Senior & Community Center. 20 Citywide Intelligent Transportation System Upgrade 975594 $2,278,800 $1,747,150 Study complete, Master Plan adopted in 2018. Programmed implementation of high priority items through the Five-Year CIP budget process. Installed shadow conduits at various locations throughout the City through MCI/Verizon agreement. Additional funding for priority locations funded through debt service financing. Phase II work on Bollinger Canyon Road from Talavera to Dougherty Road and Dougherty Road from Crow Canyon to Bollinger Canyon complete.

Phase III design for Bollinger Canyon Road from Dougherty Road (S) to Albion complete; needs funding to install. Citywide Fiber Optic Master Plan is underway with completion by end of FY 23/24. Design for Phase II alternate bid, Bollinger Canyon Road from Dougherty Road (N) to Albion Road, is underway with construction anticipated in 2024. 21 Citywide Landscaping Zone Improvements - Zone 2 300002 $402,000 $241,971 Project underway. 22 Citywide Lighting Zone Improvements - Zone 1 300001 $186,000 $185,400 Project underway. 23 Citywide Lighting Zone Street Lights Improvements -
Zone 1
300021 $225,000 $49,189 Project underway.
24 Citywide Park Amenities Replacement and
Improvements
955584 $2,725,818 $2,255,609 Annual project provides for the replacement and enhancement of aging park infrastructure and site amenities throughout the City Parks such as:
drinking fountains, barbeque grills, trash containers, picnic tables, benches, baseball backstops, fencing, concrete paving, lighting, tree and plant material replacement, irrigation system equipment. Completed valve replacement at Inverness and Del Mar Parks; replaced promenade trees, backstops at Field 1 and resurfacing of Tennis Court at Athan Downs Park; renovated track at Boone Acres Park; renovated access road and resurfacing of Tennis Court at Central Park; resurfacing of Tennis Court and basketball court at Coyote Creek Crossing; replaced synthetic field at Tiffany Roberts Sports Park; replaced walkway lighting at Dougherty Station Community Center; park landscaping at Senior Center; replaced drinking fountains at Old Ranch, Senior Center, Memorial and Central Parks; and picnic tables at Village Green and Centennial Parks; tennis court resurfacing at Cal High; electrical repair work at Central Park Sports Field; sport court resurfacing at Limerick Park; railings at Senior Center; cobble pathway at Creekside Park; concrete paving at Central Park; concrete garbage cans at Athan Downs. FY 23/24 work includes improvements at various parks subject to Park Development funding availability including Central Park holiday tree and lighting and sports field lighting; park course exercise stations at Inverness Park; basketball court resurfacing; and replacing picnic tables, barbeques, benches, fountains and garbage cans throughout various parks in City.
25 Citywide Playground Upgrades 955423 $1,305,647 $1,052,147 Work at Athan Downs Park, Old Ranch, Village Green, Mill Creek Hollow, Boone Acres, Ramona and Creekside Parks completed. FY 23/24 work includes replacement of playground equipment at Ramona Park.
26 Citywide Trail Amenities Replacement & Improvements 500006 $2,574 $0 Project underway to replace benches at Tassajara Ridge Trail. 27 Comprehensive Street Camera Installation 400002 $1,277,027 $1,271,046 Camera installed and work substantially complete including the purchase of additional cameras, with monitoring station installation once Police Department/Public Safety Complex renovation is complete. 28 Country View Zone Improvements - Zone 9 300009 $11,000 $0 No work scheduled for this FY. 29 Cricket Field Installation 500002 $300,000 $3,334 Location to install field identified at Quail Run Elementary School.

Design underway with construction in 2024.
30 Crow Canyon Gardens Facility Improvements 955421 $785,063 $241,230 Council approved "Jewel" alternative to save one room in the main Mudd's building for small events. Design Master Plan underway with concept Plan completed and presented to Parks Commission and Council in early 2023. Design underway.
31 Crow Canyon Rd. / Barbados Dr. Intersection
Improvements
905312 $175,000 $0 Design and utility relocation complete. Construction underway with completion anticipated by 2024. Work will be done in conjunction with Crow Canyon Widening Projects (CIPs 905328).
32 Crow Canyon Rd. / I-680 NB Off Ramp Improv. (C 2.9) 7116 $102,422 $87,880 Design completed. Not warranted at this time. 33 Crow Canyon Rd. / I-680 SB Off Ramp Improv. (C
2 10)
7117 $102,422 $87,880 Design completed. Not warranted at this time. 34 Crow Canyon Rd. / Iron Horse Trail Bicycle Ped.

Overcrossing
905531 $2,275,350 $106,540 $2M earmark of federal funds approved, preliminary design/concept review and NEPA update underway with design anticipated to begin in 2024.
35 Crow Canyon Rd. / Shoreline Dr. Intersection 905412 $12,454 $12,454 Roadway plan line/alignment study approved by Council. Work will be done in conjunction with Crow Canyon Widening Projects (CIPs 905327, 905328).
36 Crow Canyon Road Hydrauger Replacement 5453 $5,805 $5,805 Necessary cleanout repair completed. No work currently scheduled. 37 Crow Canyon Road Pavement Repairs (Bollinger
Canyon - City Limits)
000009 $1,500,000 $923,437 Construction to be coordinated with Alameda County through a reimbursement agreement with Alameda County and is underway with completion by end of 2023.

5.2.b
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: B: Summary of All Funded Capital Projects 2023-2028 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects)

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2023-28)
Project Expenditures
Totals through October 31, 2023
Project Name CIP
Authorized
Budget
Spent to Date
Comments
38 Crow Canyon Road Widening (Alcosta/W
Branch)(C1.10)
905328 $16,821,400 $6,460,341 Design and utility relocation complete. Construction underway with completion anticipated by 2024. Work will be done in conjunction with Crow Canyon Widening Projects (CIPs 905327, 905312).
39 Crown Ridge Zone Improvements - Zone 13 300013 $35,546 $27,546 Project underway. 40 Deerwood Zone Improvements - Zone 8 300008 $81,441 $81,441 No work scheduled for this FY. 41 Dougherty Station Community Arts Center Renovation 200004 $2,428,519 $2,275,882 Project went out to bid twice, bids rejected by Council both times due to bid irregularities and high costs. Project redesigned with Library renovation removed to be done as a separate project in the future.

Grand opening held in August 2023. Completion anticipatedend of 2023. 42 Dougherty Valley Aquatic Center Equipment
Replacement
925574 $1,687,515 $1,389,830 Annual project. Previous years work include replacement of filter sand, filter baskets, diving boards replacement, recirculation pump and motor at Children's Play Pool, replaster of 50 Meter and Children's Play pool, heater, ADA chairlift, dive stands and board, shower heads, windscreen, tarp reel components, gates to Children's Pool, replaced display pumps and equipment at Children's Pool, tarp reel components, refinished dive boards, lane lines and storage buildings, and various pumps, equipment and supplies. FY 23/24 work includes repair/replacement of tarp reel components, diving boards, wind screen, ADA chairlift components and pump room equipment components.
43 Dougherty Valley Steel Fence Replacement 300023 $150,000 $0 Twenty-nine (29) locations identified in Dougherty Valley and scheduled based on prioritization. Replacement of steel fence at priority locations identified for this FY and will be completed during FY 23/24. 44 Dougherty Valley Tree Management Plan 935564 $4,116,432 $3,668,168 Staff completed annual work plans approved by Council for FY 18/19, FY 19/20 and FY 20/21. Completed FY 21/22 AWP including Hedgecrest, Camassia, Belladonna, Balmoral, Emerson, Penzance, Kennard, and irrigation retrofit on park strips on Ivy Hill Way. Completed FY 22/23 AWP including Kellybrook, Langton, Kenwick, Jasper Hill, Pemberton, Langhorne, Craneford, Bandol, and Barossa. FY 23/24 AWP includes Subdivision 8717 (Avalon, Rosemont, Longleaf); Subdivision 9142 (Kearny, Murdock, Ames, Bennington, and Emerson); and Subdivision 9143 (Emerson, Balmoral, Kennard, Bennington, Kings, and Holborn).
45 El Nido Zone Improvements - Zone 12 300012 $17,377 $9,808 Project underway. 46 Fleet Electrification Study 400008 $200,000 $0 Project underway, with contract awarded to consultant to begin the study.
47 Financial System Upgrade & PCS Class & Facilities
Registration Software
945589 $2,067,850 $1,963,640 Full conversion and switching of financial modules in January 2019, HR in June 2019, and Energov rolled out in April 2021, and went live in April with full updated version by end of year.
48 Forest Home Farms - ADA Pathway and Parking Lot
Improvements
925583 $8,229 $8,229 Project scope has been split into multiple phases due to lack of funding.

Design for Phase 1A is complete and will advertise project once additional funding is available. Phase 1A includes drainage improvements in parking lot, providing ADA compliant parking spaces, and installing self-guided tour pathway from parking lot to Gift Shop and ADA compliant pathway along self-guided tour from Gift Shop to Glass House.
49 Forest Home Farms Structures 925418 $776,406 $574,431 Consultant completed analysis of site to prioritize projects within the site.

Sheep Barn Roof repairs, lighting upgrade to 1850 Barn and meat locker renovation with funding by the San Ramon Historic Foundation complete. FY 22/23 completed painting of Boone House, Outbuildings (Walnut Processing Barn Sheep Barn, Garage, Meat Locker, Granary), Welcome Center, improvements to Grotto, and renovation of organic garden with SR Historic Foundation donation. No new work scheduled for FY 23/24.
50 Fountain Repairs & Replacement 955478 $1,279,183 $1,165,365 Annual project. Completed filter pump, backwash valve and various parts for Bollinger Fountain, Reflection Fountain, and Central Park Children's Fountain storage tank, filter pump replacement at Canyon Lakes Fountains, and re-coating Rancho splash pad. FY 20/21 completed conversion of Canyon Lakes Fountain with landscaping; and replacement of parts at Bollinger Fountain, Central Park Children's and Meadow Fountains, and Rancho San Ramon Children's Display Pump.

FY 21/22 completed Bollinger Fountain relamping and LED pathway as well as lighting upgrades. FY 22/23 completed relamping and display lighting at Bollinger Fountain; sump pump and storage tank, vents and entry door to chem controller to Children's Fountain. No new work scheduled for this FY.
51 Four Oaks Zone Improvements - Zone 14 300014 $5,244 $5,244 No work scheduled for this FY. 52 General Plan Update 969003 $1,535,896 $1,243,657 Contract with consultant and project budget increased by Council at the September 27, 2016 meeting. Update underway, with contract amendment and additional budget increase approved by City Council.

Economic Element complete and working on Housing Element (8 year cycle) which is a 2-year process completed and certified in January 2023. General Plan 2040 Update is underway including Climate Action Plan, with completion by end of FY 23/24.
53 Glass House Zone Improvements - Zone 19 300019 $32,401 $27,401 Project underway. 54 Henry Ranch Zone Improvements - Zone 17 300017 $4,157 $4,157 No work scheduled for this FY.

5.2.b
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: B: Summary of All Funded Capital Projects 2023-2028 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects)

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2023-28)
Project Expenditures
Totals through October 31, 2023
Project Name CIP
Authorized
Budget
Spent to Date
Comments
55 Interior Amenities Renovation 925515 $1,569,391 $1,104,374 Annual project that provides for the renovation and replacement of interior amenities throughout the City's facilities. Previous years work included replacing Mecco shades at DSCC, generator at SRSC, water heater at IH Gym, refrigerator at DVAC Lifeguard office, Holiday lights at City Hall, scoreboards and controllers at IH and PV gymnasiums, painting interior walls, replacing drapes and stage curtain at Front Row Theater, painting stage wall at DVPAC, replacing washer/dryer at SRSC, installation of AED at City Hall, replacing microwaves at DVSC and IH Gym, AED installation at Farm, replacing microwave at Service Center, coffee maker at ASCC, entrance doors at SROP chlorine and acid rooms, painting of lobby/City area interior walls, re-upholstering of lobby chairs, counters in restrooms and green rooms at DVPAC, painting interior walls at IHG, and drinking fountains at IH and PV gyms.

FY 23/24 work underway includes dishwasher and ice maker replacement at DVSC, ice maker and washer/dryer at SRSC, partition wall and macho shades and AED at ASCC, painting of interior walls at Front Row and stage walls at DVPAC, replace entrance doors to chlorine room at DVAC, replace AED at SRCC and door and hardware replacements.
56 Iron Horse Trail Landscaping & Beautification 5514 $739,840 $739,839 Construction completed. No work currently scheduled. 57 Irrigation Booster Pump Installation 955516 $830,728 $601,978 All prior work has been completed including Old Ranch Park, Quail Run Elementary School Park, Athan Downs Park, East Branch, Live Oak and Walt Disney School Parks and East Branch Parkway at Arlington Way and Windemere Parkway at S. Bellingham Way. FY 23/24 work includes booster pump installations at Bellingham Square Park and 2 prioritized sites in Dougherty Valley.
58 Kami Court Landslide Repair 400003 $5,500,000 $4,991,406 Phase I work is complete. Phase 2 remediation substantially complete.

Additional monitoring and minor repairs and continue environmental mitigation and monitoring in FY 23/24.
59 Middle School Teen Portables 925527 $388,542 $141,346 Two school sites have been completed. Staff is working with School District to determine best approach to replace existing portable unit at Pine Valley Middle School.
60 Montevideo Drive/Broadmoor Drive Traffic Signal 5459 $24,908 $24,908 Interconnect work completed. Beyond Five-Year for signal install if/when warranted.
61 Old Ranch Estates Zone Improvement - Zone 10 300010 $180,000 $54,877 Project underway. 62 Old Ranch Summit Zone Improvement - Zone 18 300018 $210,000 $3,776 Project underway. 63 Open Space Preservation 945572 $3,350,000 $32,608 Open Space Trail map completed by consultant. City received $500,000 from Faria developer in September 2018 after 100th building permit was issued. Consultant analysis of Cross Valley Trail Extension and Alignment Study as discussed with Policy Committee on Sept. 26, 2018 is complete. City received additional $500,000 from Faria developer in July 2020 after 300th building permit was issued. Habitat assessment of Old Ranch Trails to Dougherty Hills complete. Anticipate receiving additional $1M during FY 23/24 from Preserve developer. 64 Park Restroom Renovations 955491 $430,197 $155,897 All prior work has been completed. Completed work at Memorial Park in 2017, Boone Acres Park in 2018, and Village Green Park in 2019. FY 23/24 work includes building replacement at Alcosta Senior and Community Center Park.
65 Parking Lot Pavement Maintenance 905438 $184,047 $184,047 All prior work has been completed. Memorial Park parking lot and path work completed. Slurry seal of the trail at Memorial Park completed in summer 2020. Pavement Condition Survey of all parks parking lots completed. No work scheduled for FY 23/24.
66 Pavement Management - 2023 000008 $6,074,650 $1,974,856 List of streets to be treated was presented to Council for approval in May 2023 and forwarded to California Transportation Commission (CTC) as part of SB-1 requirements. Construction underway with completion by end of 2023. Concrete work was completed prior to pavement work. 67 Pavement Management - 2024 000013 $3,025,800 $367,190 List of streets to be treated was presented to Council for approval on May 2023 and forwarded to California Transportation Commission (CTC) as part of SB-1 requirements. Digout work completed in anticipation of construction in 2024. Work order for concrete work to be issued in anticipation of pavement work.
68 Pavement Repair Stop Gap - 2022/23 000006 $400,000 $89,614 Project awarded two separate contracts for crack sealing and pot hole repairs, and first work order issued and completed. Work ongoing. 69 Pavement Repair Stop Gap - 2024/25 000014 $400,000 $0 Project underway with request for bids anticipated by end of 2023. 70 Pedestrian Enhancement Devices 975413 $1,362,975 $1,174,477 Construct as recommended by TAC and based on warrant analysis.

Crossing enhancement at Village Parkway/Triana Way crosswalk complete. Installed RRFB system on San Ramon Valley Boulevard at Safeway driveway and Monarch Road at Japonica Way in June 2021 with TDA Grant. Received TDA Grant for installation of RRFB on Bollinger Canyon Road at Dos Rios Drive and Marsh Drive; design completed with construction to begin once equipment is received with completion by end of FY 23/24.
71 Pickleball Court Conversion 500005 $50,000 $0 FY 23/24 work underway and includes conversion of one tennis court to four pickleball courts at Central Park.

5.2.b
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: B: Summary of All Funded Capital Projects 2023-2028 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects)

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2023-28)
Project Expenditures
Totals through October 31, 2023
Project Name CIP
Authorized
Budget
Spent to Date
Comments
72 Police and Fire District Joint Public Safety Complex 200007 $27,735,000 $27,012,251 Work being paid by SRVFPD as outlined in MOU between the City and Fire District. Work began June 2021 with construction in the renovation of Police in eastside of building, and new EOC building. Police and inspection staff have moved back into the newly renovated eastside in July 2022. Roof repairs completed. Parking lot repairs completed in October 2022. Onsite parking lot and landscape improvements and EV charger station work underway. Fire District staff moved into the east side of building and EOC, and 9-1-1 call center by early 2024. 73 Public Art in Parks 955482 $364,700 $215,395 Annual project. Work completed at City Hall, Athan Downs, and Utility Box Art Program Phase 1 and 2. Artist selected for Library Art Piece and presented to Arts Commission in December 2021 and approved in March 2022; Parks Commission approved design June 2022; and artist has begun design with installation anticipated for end of 2023. Fund raising for the Eagle Art Piece is underway; due to the delay of Rancho San Ramon Park, Arts Committee and Parks Commission approved to relocate Eagle Art Piece to Memorial Park. FY 23/24 work includes new art piece for newly renovated DS Community Arts Center and temporary public art piece.
74 Public Meeting Access Enhancements 200010 $525,000 $358,757 Video TV wall installed by on-call contractor and is in active use. 75 Radar Speed Display Sign 975481 $144,434 $144,434 Faria Preserve Developer installed two (2) on Bollinger Canyon Road between Norris Canyon Road and Crow Canyon Road; and installed 2 additional signs within the development in August 2021; and a final sign installed in November 2022; and City installed one on Davona Drive near Winthrop Avenue. No work scheduled this FY.
76 Recreation Program and Facilities Equipment
Replacement
925590 $373,206 $360,705 Work completed at DV Front Row Theater box office, green room, ticketing printer, and San Ramon Community Center chairs replacement; closed circuit camera at DVPAC, and audio and visual equipment upgrades at SRCC Fountain and Terrace Rooms, audio and visual equipment upgrades and lobby gallery furniture at SRCC, LED light conversion and installation of new console at Front Row Theater, and speaker and audio improvements at ASCC, and rewiring for new audio and visual system at SROP, and replacing Ridgeview Room chairs at DSCAC completed. FY 23/24 work includes replacing aging lobby and public space furniture in DSCAC. Completed for grand reopening. 77 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Enhancements 905612 $45,000 $34,335 Work orders are issued and completed by Public Services staff.

Installation of RRFB at Gale Ranch Middle School at the intersection of N. Monarch and Bayleaf completed in October 2020. Gale Ranch Middle School and SRVUSD contributed $10,000 each for the RRFB work. FY 19/20 SRTS report not completed due to COVID-19 and school closures. Observations for FY 23/24 completed on as needed basis. Report to be presented to Council and improvements installed as needed.
78 San Ramon Community Center Renovation 200003 $2,896,939 $2,764,109 Construction of interior complete; work on exterior including terrace room patio doors, ADA compliance on 2nd floor railing, paint of exterior railings, and exterior granite sealing complete. Shade structure redesign presented to Infrastructure Committee on October 30, 2023. Staff proceeding with final design.
79 San Ramon Olympic Pool and Aquatic Park Renovation 200006 $3,836,073 $1,945,650 With pool construction complete. Building renovations construction underway with completion by early 2024.
80 San Ramon Olympic Pool Equipment Replacement 925479 $2,815,504 $2,095,326 Annual project. Completed lap pool and 50 meter heaters, slide pumps and motors, chemical storage shed ramp, ADA chairlift, children's pool heater, lifeguard stand components, Musco lighting, gutter repairs and tarp reel, drain grates, fire panel upgrade, 50M cantilever repair, chemical room exhaust fans, pool deck lighting, DE filter element, windscreen, sump pump motor and recirculation pump/motor, Sika-flex service, tarp reel, 50M pump room equipment and components, dive stands, ADA Chairlift components, chemical shed, tarp reels, deck, Stenner Pump acid, lap pool lane lines, exhaust fans, and lap/play pool pump room equipment as well as various parts, equipment and supplies.

FY 23/24 work includes repair/replacement of 50M auto pool vacuum, shade canopies, ADA stairs, lifeguard stands, lap pool underwater pool lights, Stenner pump acid, sump pump, tarp reels, lap pool autofill clay valve assembly, pace clock and various parts.
81 San Ramon Trails Master Plan Update 500007 $125,000 $0 Project underway to issue RFP to select consultant to complete plan. 82 San Ramon Transit Center Enhancements 200005 $568,000 $56,123 Phase 1 work complete; phase 2 work under design. Project is funded with $388,000 Federal Grant.
83 Senate Bill 1383 Projects Implementation 400010 $119,217 $0 Project underway. 84 Shade Structure Improvement 955566 $418,288 $322,853 Structures at Old Ranch Park, Bark and Ride, Central Park, Sports Park, and Ramona Park complete. Proposition 68 funds grant awarded; NOE filed and finalized 5 locations and contract executed. Contractor has begun work, with completion anticipated end of 2023.
85 Sidewalk Repairs - 2022/2023 400005 $307,219 $5,917 A total of 3 work orders have been issued to date, with 2 complete, and work is ongoing.
86 Sidewalk Repairs - 2024/2025 400008 $250,000 $0 Project to go out for bid and contract award by Council in 2024.

5.2.b
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: B: Summary of All Funded Capital Projects 2023-2028 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects)

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (2023-28)
Project Expenditures
Totals through October 31, 2023
Project Name CIP
Authorized
Budget
Spent to Date
Comments
87 Street Landscape Planting Renovation 935488 $2,422,876 $2,177,261 Locations identified; FY 17/18 completed Canyon Lakes area, Fostoria, Summerwood Loop and various sites in Dougherty Valley. FY 18/19 completed renovation in medians at West Branch, Old Ranch Estates, Crown Ridge, Deerwood, Canyon Lakes, Bollinger Canyon Road at Dougherty Road and various sites in Dougherty Valley. FY 19/20 completed renovation in medians within Dougherty Valley. FY 20/21 completed replacement of 75 trees, and turf strip improvements in Dougherty Valley, landscape improvement on Coyote Crossing Trail.

FY 21/22 completed renovation in Gale Ridge, Windemere Parkway, N.

Monarch, Stoneleaf, Wedgewood, and Bollinger Canyon Road and Dougherty Road in Dougherty Valley. FY 22/23 completed landscape infill on Sherwood Way at East Branch Parkway to Chancery Way, Albion Road at Bollinger Canyon Road to Windemere Parkway south side, Windemere Parkway at Kearny Way to Longleaf Circle, East Branch Parkway at Windemere Middle School monuments and Bollinger Canyon Road at the DSCAC. FY 23/24 continue plantings and landscape renovations in Dougherty Valley.
88 Summerwood Loop Zone Improvements - Zone 5 300005 $160,956 $131,062 Project underway. 89 Sunrise Ridge Park (Preserve Neighborhood Park) 5619 $8,753,058 NA Built by Developer, construction underway and anticipate completion by end of 2023.
90 Traffic Calming Program 905381 $191,484 $169,027 On going; based on TAC recommendations and staff evaluation. RTC toolkit and brochures distributed September 2021. No other work identified at this time.
91 Traffic Impact Mitigation Fee Study Update 000007 $80,000 $79,999 Consultant TIF study underway and substantially complete which include the AB 602 requirements of LOS analysis and redefining residential fee calculation using square footage instead of per unit. Proposed fee update scheduled for adoption in FY 23/24.
92 Traffic Signals Improvements & Enhancements 975526 $2,020,154 $1,659,392 Annual project. Traffic loop installation at priority locations completed including audible pedestrian unit, battery backup units, conflict monitors, Opticom systems, signal controllers and signal modems; completed upgrades/replaced signal controllers, conflict monitors, battery backup units, vehicle detector units, Opticom pre-emption units and traffic signal pole painting, and emergency backup generator. FY 23/24, continue to upgrade/replace signal controllers, conflict monitors, battery backup units, vehicle detector units, radar speed display units, in-roadway flashing warning lights, and Opticom pre-emption units. 93 Village Parkway Zone Improvements - Zone 11 300011 $70,880 $55,880 Project underway. 94 Vista San Ramon Zone Improvements - Zone 4 300004 $24,064 $24,064 No work scheduled for this FY. 95 West Branch Zone Improvements - Zone 6 300006 $174,920 $48,494 Project underway.

5.2.b
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: B: Summary of All Funded Capital Projects 2023-2028 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects)

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Finance Committee
December 11, 2023

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Fiscal Year 2022/23
Completed Projects

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 27
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Pavement Management 2022
2 Finance Committee
CIP 000005 • 18,810 Tons of HMA for inlays and overlays • 128,891 SY of 2 inch cold planning for inlays • 5.57 miles of roadway treatment • 227,512 SF of 4 inch digouts • Cost: $4,875,901 • Funding: GT/MJ, COP, RVIF • ADA curb ramp upgrades and concrete repairs • Pavement base failure repairs • Striping, marking, and markers • Bicycle network improvements as part of CIP 905613

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Pavement Management 2022
3 Finance Committee
Locations included: • Anza Court, Arlewood Court, Kinvarra Court, Millbridge Place, Ryegate Place, and Aranda
Drive
• Street sections on Dougherty Road, between
Old Ranch Road and Austin Creek Avenue;
Bollinger Canyon Road, between Canyon
Lakes Drive and Dougherty Road; Dougherty
Road, between Crow Canyon Road and
Bollinger Canyon Road

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Pavement Management 2022
4 Finance Committee
Curb Ramps Pavement – Bollinger Canyon Road

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) PMP 2022 VICINITY MAP
5 Finance Committee

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Citywide Bicycle Network
Improvements and Enhancements
6 Finance Committee
CIP 905613 – Phase 2
• Green Conflict Zones, buffered bike lanes and Sharrows at seven roadway segments in the bicycle network
• Bollinger Canyon Rd - Dougherty Rd (N) to Dougherty Rd (S); • Dougherty Rd - Bollinger Canyon Rd (N) to Bollinger Canyon Rd (S); • Broadmoor Dr - Alcosta Bl to Montevideo Dr;
• Fostoria Wy - Iron Horse Trail to Camino Ramon;
• Norris Canyon Rd - Bollinger Canyon Rd to Twin Creeks Dr; • Bishop Dr - Executive Parkway to Norris Canyon Rd; and • Alcosta Blvd - Crow Canyon Rd to Vera Cruz Dr
• Cost: $510,049
• Funding 2019 COP

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Citywide Bicycle Network Improvements and
Enhancements
7 Finance Committee
CIP 905613 – Phase2
Before After
Sharrows - Norris Canyon Rd at San Ramon Valley Bl
Buffered bike lane with Green Conflict Zone - Bollinger Canyon Rd at Dougherty Rd

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Citywide Bicycle Network
Improvements and Enhancements
8 Finance Committee
CIP 905613 – Phase 3
• Green Conflict Zones and Buffered
Bike Lanes on two arterial roadways
in the bicycle network
• Dougherty Rd - Crow Canyon Rd
to Bollinger Canyon Rd (N)
• Bollinger Canyon Rd - Canyon
Lakes Dr to Dougherty Rd (N)
• Cost: $60,000
• Funding: 2019 COP Bollinger Canyon Rd at Gale Ridge Rd Dougherty Rd at Red Willow Rd

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Bollinger Canyon Road Frontage Improvements
9 Finance Committee
CIP 5603
• Project installed street
improvements on Bollinger
Canyon Road between Crow
Canyon Road and Faria
Preserve Parkway including
intersection improvements,
sidewalk expansion and
landscape improvements
• Budget: $500,000
• Funding: Developer
Before
After

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Faria Preserve Parkway
10 Finance Committee
CIP 5585 • Project extended westerly
5,300 feet from Faria Preserve
Parkway (formerly Purdue
Road) Extension to new Faria
Preserve development and
connect to Bollinger Canyon
Road including civil and
landscape improvements
• Budget: $4.5M • Funding: Developer
Before
After

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Faria Preserve Parkway Extension (Formerly Purdue
Road)
11 Finance Committee
CIP 5540
• Project extended Faria
Preserve Parkway (formerly
Purdue Road) westerly from
Omega Drive to approximately
500 feet to include civil and
landscape improvements
• Budget: $823,132
• Funding: Developer
Before
After

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) San Ramon Valley Blvd. / Deerwood Rd. Intersection
Improvements
12 Finance Committee
CIP 5586
• Project provided capacity
improvements at SRVB/ Fostoria
Way/Deerwood Road
intersection. Improvements
included installation of dual left
turn lanes on NB SRVB and
lengthening existing EB left turn
lane on Deerwood Road to allow
additional vehicle storage
• Budget: $350,000
• Funding: Developer After

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Citywide Drainage Infrastructure Repairs - K
13 Finance Committee
CIP 915548
• Completed phase 2 of 36-inch culvert repair at
Deerwood Rd/Crow Canyon Rd by removing
failed culvert remnants and manhole, stabilize
outfall pipe by connecting a new culvert pipe
section and build riprap apron and reconstruct
with Engineered Streambed material
• Cost: $529,581
• Funding: CMF/DMF/COP

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Fuel Management System
14 Finance Committee
CIP 200009 • Cost: $83,503 • Funding: ER

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Forest Home Farms
– Organic Garden
15 Finance Committee
CIP 925418 • Budget: $65,000 • Funding: SRHF

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Forest Home Farms
- Grotto
16 Finance Committee
CIP 925418 • Budget: $253,800 • Funding: IMF, SRHF
Before After

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Forest Home Farms – Structures Painting
17 Finance Committee
CIP 925418
• Budget: $253,800
• Funding: IMF, SRHF
Sheep Barn, Granary, Garden Shed, Meat Locker, Garage, Walnut Processing Structure, Welcome Center & Boone House

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) City Facilities HVAC Duct Cleaning & Equipment
Replacement – FY 2022/23
18 Finance Committee
CIP 925425
• Budget: $120,000
• Funding: IMF
DV Aquatic Center and DV Service Center

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) San Ramon Olympic Pool Equipment Replacement –
FY 2022/23
19 Finance Committee
CIP 925479
• Budget: $240,111
• Funding: IMF
Pool Deck Lighting
Recirculation Pump and Motor, DE Filter Elements, Stenner Pump Acid, Lane Lines, ADA Chairlift Lap Components

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Interior Amenities – FY 2022/23
20 Finance Committee
CIP 925515
• Budget: $136,139
• Funding: IMF
DVPAC Restrooms, Dressing Rooms, Box Office & Countertops, San Ramon Service Center & DVPAC Lobby Interior Painting, ASCC Coffee Maker, San Ramon Door Hardware Replacement Service Center Microwaves, Iron Horse & Pine Valley Gym Drinking Fountains

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Citywide Exterior Painting & Sealing
21 Finance Committee
CIP 925532
• Budget: $140,000
• Funding: IMF
SR Service Center Admin. Building and Warehouse Exterior Painting

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Recreation Program & Facilities Equipment
Replacement – FY 22/23
22 Finance Committee
CIP 925590
• Cost: $31,000
• Funding: ER
DV Station and Community Arts Center Ridgeview Room Chairs

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Centralized Irrigation System Upgrade FY 2021/22
23 Finance Committee
• Cost: $64,753
• Funding: DVCSA
Dougherty Valley sites:
 On Bollinger Canyon Road Controllers
north side by Golf Course (E and F)
CIP 935404 – Irrigation Controllers

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Finance Committee
24 Street Landscape Planting Renovation
CIP 935488 – 2022/23
Budget: $150,000
Funding: DVCSA
Albion Road between Bollinger Canyon Road and Windemere Parkway

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Finance Committee
25 Street Landscape Planting Renovation
CIP 935488 – 2022/23
Budget: $150,000
Funding: DVCSA
Aldgate Way Bollinger Canyon Road Sherwood Way Windemere Pkwy

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Dougherty Valley Tree Management Plan
26 Finance Committee
CIP 935564 – FY 2022/23 Annual Work Plan (AWP)
Locations include:
• Subdivisions 8150, 8151, 8154, 8157, and 8619
• Bandol Way, Barossa Drive, Craneford Way, Langton Drive, Kenwick Drive, Kellybrook Way, Kinvarra Court, Arlewood Court, Kirkstone Court, Latera Court, Langton Court, Jasper Hill Drive, Jasper Hill Court, Pemberton Drive, Langhorne Drive
• Budget: $1,220,000 prior year funding
• Funding: COP

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Finance Committee
27 Dougherty Valley Tree Management Plan
CIP 935564 – 2022/23 Annual Work Plan (AWP)
Before After

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Finance Committee
28 Dougherty Valley Tree Management Plan
CIP 935564 – 2022/23 Annual Work Plan (AWP)
Before After

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Finance Committee
29 Citywide Lighting Zone Improvements – Zone 1
CIP 300001 – Traffic Signal Pole Painting
• Locations: Intersections of
Alcosta Blvd. with Norris
Canyon Road, Bishop Ranch
15, Woodland Drive, Fire
Station 34, Overlook Drive,
as well as Norris Canyon
Road at Iron Horse Trail.
• Budget: $48,000
• Funding: L&L Zone 1

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Finance Committee
30 Citywide Landscaping Zone Improvements – Zone 2
CIP 300002 – Landscaping Renovation at Deerwood Road
Budget: $72,000

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Finance Committee
31 Citywide Landscaping Zone Improvements – Zone 2
CIP 300002 – Landscaping Renovation
Budget: $72,000
Alcosta Boulevard Dougherty Road (near City Limits) San Ramon Valley Boulevard

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Finance Committee
32 Vista San Ramon Zone Improvements – Zone 4
CIP 300004 – Landscaping Renovation in medians along Woodview Terrace Dr.

Cost: $24,064

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Finance Committee
33 Summerwood Loop Zone Improvements – Zone 5
CIP 300005 – Monument and Landscape Renovations
Budget: $80,747
Before After
Landscape Renovations on
Fallview St. & Fallen Leaf Cir.

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Finance Committee
34 Deerwood Zone Improvements – Zone 8
CIP 300008 – Landscaping Renovation on Deerwood Drive and Deerwood Road Cost: $81,441
Before After

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Finance Committee
35 Henry Ranch Zone Improvements – Zone 17
CIP 300017 – Landscaping Renovation on San Ramon Valley Blvd.

Cost: $4,157

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Finance Committee
36 Glass House Zone Improvements – Zone 19
CIP 300019 – Landscaping Renovation
Budget: $20,000

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Finance Committee
37 Citywide Lighting Zone Street Lights Improvements
CIP 300021 – Zone 1 – Streetlights Relamping Alcosta Blvd. @ Norris Canyon Budget: $50,000
Before After

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Finance Committee
38 Sidewalk Repairs – 2020/2021
CIP 400001
Cost: $192,831

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Citywide Parks Amenities
Finance Committee
39 CIP 955584
FY 2022/23 - $280,604
Funding – PDF

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Citywide Parks Amenities
40 Finance Committee
CIP 955584
Boone Acres Park Track Renovation Athan Downs Tennis Court Resurfacing

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Citywide Park Amenities
41 Finance Committee
CIP 955584
Central Park Concrete Tables ASCC New Concrete Tables
Before After Before After

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Citywide Park Amenities
42 Finance Committee
CIP 955584
Central Park Concrete Paving
Before After

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Citywide Park Amenities
43 Finance Committee
CIP 955584
Benches Picnic Tables Drinking Fountains Barbeques

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Ring and Rock Fountain Conversion
44 Finance Committee
CIP 500001
• Convert to new
landscaping, irrigation,
seating area, pergola,
wall lettering, up-lighting
and new paver walkway
• Cost: $271,282
• Funding: CBF
After
Before
Vault Removal

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Ring and Rock Fountain Conversion
45 Finance Committee
CIP 500001 • Cost: $271,282
Pergola

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Citywide Dog Park Renovation and Improvements
46 Finance Committee
CIP 500003
• Renovated the large
dog park surface
material to turf at the
Bark & Ride Park
• Cost: $96,964
• Funding: PDF
Before After

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Irrigation Booster Pump Installation – FY 2021/22
47 Finance Committee
CIP 955516 – Windemere Parkway and East Branch Parkway
• Cost: $77,551
• Funding: DVCSA
Windemere Pkwy @ S. Bellingham Way East Branch Pkwy @ Arlington Rd

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Fostoria Way / Costco Driveway Traffic Signal
48 Finance Committee
CIP 5622
• Costco installed a new traffic
signal on Fostoria Way at the
Costco Driveway to the new
Costco Gas Station
• Budget: $631,000
• Funding: Developer

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) San Ramon Valley Blvd/Faria Preserve Pkwy Traffic
Signal
49 Finance Committee
CIP 5461
• Faria development installed a new
traffic signal on San Ramon Valley
Boulevard at Faria Preserve
Parkway (formerly Purdue Road)
as a condition of the Faria
Preserve Development
• Budget: $350,000
• Funding: Developer

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Radar Speed Display Sign (RSDS)
50 Finance Committee
CIP 975481
• New RSDS installed by Lennar at:
Bollinger Canyon Road SB, between
Morgan Drive and Memorial Park
Bollinger Canyon Road NB, between
Marsh Drive and Dos Rios Drive
Bollinger Canyon Road, north of Faria
Preserve Parkway at the City/County
Limit
Faria Preserve Parkway EB, west of
Omega Road
Faria Preserve Parkway WB within
median approximately 900 feet east
of Bollinger Canyon Road
• Cost: $30,471
• Funding: TIF/Developer

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Traffic Signals Improvements & Enhancements –
FY 22/23
51 Finance Committee
CIP 975526
• Replaced 7 2070 traffic signal controllers, 4
conflict monitors, 2 battery back-up units, 120
batteries for BBUs, 4 BBU inverters, 20 vehicle
detector cards, 1 radar display unit, 1 RRFB, 6
signal Ethernet connect switches, 4 replacement
radar guns, 1 Polara pedestrian push button
system, and 1 spare Rhythm Processor for traffic
signals
• Cost: $217,884
• Funding: IMF

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) Citywide Intelligent Transportation System (ITS)
Upgrade - Implementation
52 Finance Committee
CIP 975594 – Phase I, II
• Fiber and upgrades on
Bollinger Canyon Road:
connect to City hall and
connect virtual server;
Bollinger Canyon between
Talavera Drive and Dougherty
Road N; and Dougherty Road
from Crow Canyon Road to
Bollinger Canyon Road N
• Cost: $1,645,958
• Funding: TIF and COP

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects) QUESTIONS/COMMENTS?

5.2.c
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: C: Completed CIP Projects FY 22-23 (4168 : Completed CIP Projects)

FINANCE COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 11, 2023
TO: Finance Committee/City Manager
FROM: Maria Fierner, Public Works Director
By: Deborah Fehr, Senior Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: Draft San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that the Finance Committee receive the Draft Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) Update Report and provide comments to staff.

BACKGROUND
City of San Ramon Ordinance No. 135, adopted June 28, 1988, establishes a traffic impact mitigation fee to defray the actual costs of constructing roadway improvements that are needed to accommodate the cumulative traffic impacts caused by all new development. In 1997, the City Council approved Resolution No. 97-60, modifying the City’s Traffic Impact Fee in recognition of the effects of the Southern Contra Costa Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement fees that were enacted in December of 1996. In 2016, the City prepared a Traffic Impact Fee Nexus Study Update that was adopted by the City Council on September 27, 2016. Traffic Impact Fees have not been adjusted since 2016 except for nominal annual adjustments for construction cost inflation.

Traffic improvement fees are currently required for all new development within the City as follows:

5.3 Packet Pg. 80
Table 1: Current San Ramon TIF Fee Amounts
Fee Category Unit Current Traffic Impact Fee
(as of July 1, 2023)
Residential
Single Family Dwelling Unit (DU) $2,918
Multifamily DU $1,809
Other PM Peak Hour Trip $2,766
Nonresidential
Retail 1,000 Square Feet (KSF) $6,090
Office KSF $7,070
Service Commercial KSF $3,290
Other PM Peak Hour Trip $2,766

DISCUSSION
The Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code 66000-66025), requires local agencies to make certain findings when establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of approval for a development project. The findings must demonstrate a reasonable nexus between the new development, the needed transportation facilities to serve the new development, and the amount of the fees before adopting any new fees or increasing existing fees.

The City’s Traffic Impact Fee is updated annually to reflect changes in the Bay Area Construction Cost Index (CCI); however, the CCI increase averages between 2% - 4% per year.

Significant factors affecting the City’s Traffic Impact Fee have changed over the past seven years, including:
• Increases in construction costs of transportation improvements • Changes in the number and type of building units
• Changes in the roadway network
• Changes in the scope of projects and priorities of the City’s Capital Improvement Program
• Changes in land use designations
In anticipation of the need to finance essential transportation infrastructure, the City contracted with Fehr and Peers and Kimley-Horn to update the City’s Traffic Impact Fee (SRTIF). A copy of the Draft Final Study is provided as Attachment A. A simplified description of the Study methodology is as follows:

5.3 Packet Pg. 81

1. Using a computer model to estimate travel demand generated by future development on the City’s transportation network, estimate the total number of new trips expected to impact the network.

2. Determine eligibility for TIF financing of the City projects planned to be needed as a result of future development. Prepare new cost estimates for all eligible projects or validate existing estimates. Determine the cost percentage for each project that is eligible for TIF financing. Add the costs of these projects to determine the total cost of required improvements.

3. Compute the impact fee by dividing the total cost of the improvements by the number of new trips generated by the planned development.

The first step was accomplished using the growth projections that were recently prepared for the purposes of the Tri-Valley Transportation Council (TVTC) Fee Update and assigning the trips from planned development onto the regional roadway network using the Contra Costa Transportation Authority’s computerized travel demand model. Both the TVTC Update, and this Nexus Study, use a horizon year of 2040.

Next, the projects within the City’s Capital Improvement Program were reviewed to determine TIF funding eligibility. A thorough review of transportation improvement projects identified in the CIP was completed and a list of 24 projects was developed for inclusion in the updated SRTIF, which is included as Attachment B. Of these projects, 13 are being carried over from the current SRTIF Program and 11 new projects have been added.

Assembly Bill (AB) 602 was approved on September 28, 2021, and went into effect on January 1, 2022. This bill requires that impact fee nexus studies adopted on and after January 1, 2022, include the following:
• Level of Service Analysis: Identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the new level of service for the public facility once an improvement (project) is constructed, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is necessary. This analysis evaluated 17 projects.
• Housing Analysis: Calculate fees levied or imposed on housing development projects proportionately to the square footage of the proposed units or make specified findings explaining why square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate the fee. Simply, development impact fees must be stratified by the size of the housing unit or provide findings that support not stratifying the fees.

Therefore, an AB 602 deficiency analysis and fee stratification analysis were conducted as part of the SRTIF Nexus Study.

The third step was completed by dividing the total cost of all improvements meeting the TIF criteria by the total number of new trips generated by new development to yield a unit cost for each PM peak hour trip as shown:

5.3 Packet Pg. 82
Total Transportation Improvement Cost
=
Cost ($)
Total Trip Generation of Growth in New Development
from 2020 to 2040 (P.M. Peak Hour Trips)
P.M. Peak Hour
Trips
Once the cost per peak hour trip is determined, it can be converted to a cost per unit of development that becomes the fee amount as shown in the following equation (see Attachment C for calculation of each land use category):

Fee per Trip X
Adjusted PM Peak Trip
Demand Factor +
Administrative
Charge (2%) = Total Fee per Unit
The result is a revised Traffic Impact Fee that reflects current construction costs, land use assumptions, and future City transportation infrastructure needs.

The proposed fees are the maximum fees that can be assessed based on the current CIP. Taking into consideration the sensitive nature of fee adjustments, the City Council has the option to reduce the proposed fees.

Table 2: Fee per Land Use Category
Land Use Category Unit Current
Fee
Proposed
Fee
Percent
Change
Residential
Single Family < 1,000 SF DU $2,918 $3,438 18%
Single Family 1,000-1,499 SF DU $2,918 $3,728 28%
Single Family 1,500-1,999 SF DU $2,918 $3,893 33%
Single Family 2,000-2,499 SF DU $2,918 $4,018 38%
Single Family 2,500-2,999 SF DU $2,918 $4,142 42%
Single Family 3,000-3,999 SF DU $2,918 $4,266 46%
Single Family >4,000 SF DU $2,918 $4,308 48%
Multi-family DU $1,809 $2,247 24%
Other PM Peak Hour Trip $2,766 $4,726 71%
Nonresidential
Retail KSF $6,090 $8,132 34%
Office KSF $7,070 $10,205 68%
Service Commercial1 KSF $3,290 $4,745 44%
Other PM Peak Hour Trip $2,766 $4,726 71%
1The Service Commercial Raw Fee per Unit was calculated to maintain the same relationship between the Office fee and the Service Commercial fee that is contained in the City’s current fee schedule.

Source: Fehr & Peers, Nexus Study 2021 and Kimley-Horn, Nexus Study 2023. Fee per Single Family DUs developed based AB 602 Housing Analysis.

5.3 Packet Pg. 83
Although the proposed fee schedule will increase revenues for all new development in San Ramon compared with current City fees, the new schedule of fees proposed are less than the traffic fees for other agencies in most categories, and generally compares favorably with other fees imposed by other area agencies. An excerpt from the comparison with other agencies’ fees provided in the TIF Study is reproduced as Table 3 below. The complete table with references is provided in the Study.

Table 3: Comparison of Impact Fees with Other Local Agencies Municipality / Authority Single-Family
(Per Unit)
Multifamily
(Per Unit)
Retail (Per
KSF)
Office (Per
KSF)
San Ramon (Current) $2,918 $1,809 $6,090 $7,070
San Ramon (Proposed) $4,142* $2,247 $8,132 $10,205
Average of Nearby Jurisdictions $9,510 $6,255 $12,462 $12,134 Brentwood $14,567 $9,031 $5,428 $6,511
Concord $3,251 $2,624 $8,810 $7,040
Dublin (West Dublin) $7,681 $3,994 $7,681 $7,681
Oakley $14,587 $8,898 $2,567 $8,893
Livermore (Downtown) N/A $4,913 $14,595 N/A
Livermore (All other areas) $11,869 $8,002 $32,235 $20,636 Martinez $2,221 $1,528 $2,230 $1,810
Pleasant Hill $3,879 $3,110 $10,030 $8,527
Pleasanton $11,392 $7,005 $26,130 $17,780
Alamo (Unincorporated Contra
Costa County) $16,142 $13,446 $14,910 $14,910
Regional Fees
Contra Costa Sub-Regional Fees $5,178 $5,178 $5,000 $7,970 Southern Contra Costa Regional
Fees $1,853 $1,853 $1,810 $2,910
Tri-Valley Transportation
Development Fees $6,946 $4,095 $5,920 $9,280
Note: N/A - Not Applicable or Not Available, KSF = 1,000 Square Feet. * Fee reported for the middle group of dwelling unit sizes.

On November 16, 2023, the Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update was presented to the Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC). TAC members had several questions and comments, which did not require updating the Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update. Comments from TAC included clarification of project list, factoring in future inflation of projects, and Committee overall felt that this increase in comparison with surrounding cities is still a much lower overall fee.

5.3 Packet Pg. 84

FISCAL ANALYSIS
The revenues collected from the Traffic Impact Fees for new development will increase in proportion to the increased fee amounts for all new development. For example, in FY 2022/23, the Traffic Improvement Fund received $439,858 in impact fee revenue; if all impact fees were increased by 33% (the rate of a single family unit of 1,500-1,999 square feet), the TIF would receive an additional $145,153 in new revenue. The cost of the Study is included with the costs of the capital improvements used as a basis for the calculation of the proposed fees. The proposed fees presented provide a significant portion of the funding needed to complete the listed CIP projects; however, most of the projects will also require supplemental funding. If some of the projects in the current Capital Improvement Program are removed from the Program, the City may incur an obligation to refund any TIF fee components related to these identified projects. If the proposed fees are reduced, this will reduce the amount of TIF funding available to cover the costs for each project and additional supplemental funding will be required.

NEXT STEPS
The Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update will be updated to include any Finance Committee comments. The Study will be presented to the City Council for review and adoption, including the relevant fee ordinances to be amended.

ATTACHMENT
A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update
B: Project Costs Eligible for TIF Program
C: Fee Calculation Per Land Use Category

5.3 Packet Pg. 85
Final Draft Report
San Ramon Traffic
Impact Fee Update
Prepared for:

City of San Ramon
October 2023
WC21-3819

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Table of Contents

1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1 Background and Purpose.......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Organization of the Report ...................................................................................................................................................... 2

2. Project List ............................................................................................................................... 3

3. Growth Projections ................................................................................................................. 7 Projections by Land Use Category ........................................................................................................................................ 7 Trip Generation by Land Use ................................................................................................................................................... 7

4. AB 602 Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 10 Level of Service Analysis Methodology .............................................................................................................................11 Level of Service Results ............................................................................................................................................................15 Housing Analysis ........................................................................................................................................................................21

5. Nexus Allocation and Fee Calculations ............................................................................... 26 Allocation to Users ....................................................................................................................................................................26 Fee Calculations ..........................................................................................................................................................................28

6. Summary of Required Program Elements .......................................................................... 30 Appendices................................................................................................................................... 31 Appendix A: Traffic Impact Fees in San Ramon and Nearby Jurisdictions ..........................................................31 Appendix B: Level of Service Analysis Outputs ..............................................................................................................32

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) List of Figures
Figure 1: San Ramon TIF Projects ................................................................................................................................................. 4 List of Tables
Table 1: Current San Ramon TIF Fee Amounts ........................................................................................................................ 2 Table 2: Proposed San Ramon TIF Projects .............................................................................................................................. 5 Table 3: Citywide Growth Projections ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Table 4: Trip Demand Factors ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 Table 5: Growth Converted to Adjusted PM Peak Trips ...................................................................................................... 9 Table 6: Projects Analyzed in AB 602 Analysis...................................................................................................................... 10 Table 7: Methodology and Measure of Effectiveness........................................................................................................ 11 Table 8: Intersection Level of Service Criteria ....................................................................................................................... 12 Table 9: Roadway Level of Service Criteria ............................................................................................................................. 12 Table 10: Safety Level of Service Criteria ................................................................................................................................ 13 Table 11: Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) categories ................................................................................................................. 14 Table 12: Level of Traffic Stress Criteria – Ped/Bike Overcrossing ................................................................................ 14 Table 13: Level of Traffic Stress Criteria – Roadway Improvements for Ped/Bike .................................................. 15 Table 14: Intersection Level of Service Summary ................................................................................................................ 16 Table 15: Roadway Capacity Level of Service Summary – Project 3 ............................................................................ 17 Table 16: Safety Analysis Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 18 Table 17: Safety Analysis Summary – Project 21 ................................................................................................................. 18 Table 18: Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing Level of Traffic Stress Summary ................................................... 20 Table 19: Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing Level of Traffic Stress Summary ................................................... 20 Table 20: City of San Ramon Trip Generation Data – Replica 2019 ............................................................................. 22 Table 21: No. of Single-Family Unit Detached Structures by AHS Square Foot Category .................................. 23 Table 22: Peak Vehicle Trips for All Households in Each AHS Square Foot Category .......................................... 24 Table 23: Single-Family Units Built in San Ramon’s Surrounding Region ................................................................. 24 Table 24: Estimated EDUs for Single-Family Units by Square Foot Groupings ....................................................... 25 Table 25: Project Costs Eligible for TIF ..................................................................................................................................... 27 Table 26: Calculation of Fee per Adjusted PM Peak Trip ................................................................................................. 28 Table 27: Fee per Land Use Category ...................................................................................................................................... 29

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
1 1. Introduction
Background and Purpose
Impact fees are established under the California Government Code sections 66000 through 66025, also sometimes known as Assembly Bill (AB) 1600 or the Mitigation Fee Act. Fees charged pursuant to this legislation are used to build capital facilities needed to offset the impacts generated by new development.

It is common practice throughout California for local jurisdictions to establish impact fee programs to fund the construction of several types of public infrastructure and facilities; one common type of fee program is a traffic impact fee, which generates funds that are used to construct infrastructure and provide facilities that support the transportation needs of new residents and businesses.

Per the requirements of the Government Code, each impact fee program must be supported by a “nexus” analysis, which is a rational and documented set of procedures by which the agency establishes that there is a reasonable relationship (or “nexus”) between anticipated future development in the jurisdiction, the need for new infrastructure to support that development, and the fees that will be charged to help fund that infrastructure. Thus, the technical reports (such as this report) that are prepared to support a fee program are commonly called nexus studies.

The City of San Ramon currently maintains a citywide Traffic Impact Fee (referred to in this report as the San Ramon TIF or SRTIF) program, which was established in 1988 and has been continuously maintained since that time, as a mechanism for funding a portion of the costs of needed transportation improvements within the City. As required by State law, City staff includes the SRTIF program in the City’s annual financial reports, and every five years staff reviews the capital improvement costs, updates the land use inventory, and determines whether any adjustment to the fee may be needed. The most recent annual financial report was approved by the City Council on April 25, 2023, and became effective on July 1, 2023, while the most recent comprehensive review was presented to the City Council on August 9, 2016.

The most recent comprehensive nexus update conducted for the SRTIF program was documented in San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update, prepared by Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., dated February 24, 2016 (referred to in this document as the 2016 TIF Update). As a result of that nexus update, the fee amounts for all land use categories underwent substantial adjustments per the City Council Action Item 2016-59; for example, the fee per single family dwelling unit was adjusted from $828 per unit to $2,174 per unit. Since 2016, the fee amounts have been indexed annually for inflation. The current fee amounts are shown in Table 1.

The City of San Ramon is now updating the SRTIF program to adjust the list of capital improvement projects, update the cost estimates for those projects, and reflect the most recent projections of population and employment growth in the City. The fees will continue to be charged on new development that occurs anywhere in the City of San Ramon. The purpose of this report is to serve as the necessary documentation to allow the City to adjust the SRTIF program.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
2 Table 1: Current San Ramon TIF Fee Amounts
Fee Category Unit Current Traffic Impact Fee
(as of July 1, 2023)
Residential
Single Family Dwelling Unit $2,918
Multifamily Dwelling Unit $1,809
Other PM Peak Hour Trip $2,766
Nonresidential
Retail Thousand Square
Feet (KSF)
$6,090
Office KSF $7,070
Service Commercial KSF $3,290
Other PM Peak Hour Trip $2,766
Organization of the Report
After this introductory section, the report contains four additional sections:
• Section 2 – Project List, describes the list of capital improvement projects that would be included in the program.
• Section 3 – Growth Projections, documents the amount of growth anticipated over the next twenty years in the City of San Ramon.
• Section 4 – Nexus Analysis and Fee Calculations, describes the results of the nexus analysis and calculates the fee amounts using the information presented in the report. • Section 5 – Summary of Required Program Elements, summarizes how the information in this report satisfies the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code 66000-66025).

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
3 2. Project List
The current SRTIF program contains 33 transportation improvement projects, listed on pages 14-15 of the 2016 TIF Update. Over the past several years, the City of San Ramon has completed construction of several of the projects and has conducted additional planning and engineering work on several other projects, allowing for more refined project descriptions and cost estimates to be prepared. In addition, through recent planning studies and environmental review procedures, the City has identified several new capital improvement projects that have been deemed to be needed to support the City’s future growth.

The City regularly updates its Capital Improvement Program (CIP), most recently in May 2023, as one of the key methods of implementing the City’s General Plan in order to maintain operational standards for the City’s transportation system. For the purposes of this SRTIF update, City staff undertook a thorough review of transportation improvement projects identified in the CIP and developed a list of 24 projects for inclusion in the updated SRTIF. Of these projects, 13 are being carried over from the current SRTIF program and 11 new projects have been added. The area covered by the SRTIF and the location of projects proposed for inclusion in the fee program are shown on Figure 1.

Cost estimates for all projects have been drawn from the most recent CIP, supplemented with cost information supplied by City staff. The updated project list, including the cost estimates, is shown in Table 2.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) * Projects #11 and #16-22 are either citywide projects or in multiple locations and are not displayed on the map. 12 Montevideo Dr. / Broadmoor Dr. Traffic
Signal
13 Pine Valley Road / Broadmoor Drive
Traffic Signal
14 Old Crow Canyon Rd. Corridor
Improvement
15 Crow Canyon Rd. / Iron Horse Trail
Bicycle Pedestrian Overcrossing
16 Citywide Bicycle Network
Improvements & Enhancements*
17 Radar Speed Display SIgn*
18 Citywide Intelligent Transportation
System Upgrades*
19 Bike Master Plan Update*
20 ITS Master Plan Update*
21 Local Roadway Safety Plan Projects*
22 Future Nexus Study Update*
23 Smart Signals Project*
24 Bollinger Canyon Rd. Improvement
1 Camino Ramon Shopping Center
Intersection Improvements
2 Bollinger Canyon Rd. / Crow Canyon Rd.

Intersection
3 Fostoria Way Widening
4 Bollinger Canyon Rd. / Norris Canyon Rd.

Traffic Signal
5 Crow Canyon Rd. / Service Center Traffic
Signal
6 San Ramon Valley Blvd. / Westside Dr.

Traffic Signal
7 San Ramon Valley Blvd. Curb Installation
8 San Ramon Valley Blvd. / Hooper Dr.

Traffic Signal
9 Camino Ramon Office Park Intersection
Improvements
10 Crow Canyon Rd. / Shoreline Dr.

Intersection
11 Pedestrian Enhancements*

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
5 Table 2: Proposed San Ramon TIF Projects
Number1 Project Name Description
Total
Estimated
Cost (2023 $)
1 CIP 5303 Camino Ramon Shopping
Center Intersection Improvements
Widen the driveway from the Commons Shopping
Center onto Camino Ramon to provide an
exclusive right turn lane, and a shared left and
through lane.
$568,700
2 CIP 5311 Bollinger Canyon Rd. /
Crow Canyon Rd. Intersection
Accommodate a right turn lane from southbound
Bollinger Canyon Road to westbound Crow
Canyon Road.
$763,500
3 CIP 5313 Fostoria Way Widening Add one lane in each direction. $3,685,500 4 CIP 5335 Bollinger Canyon Rd. /
Norris Canyon Rd. Traffic Signal
Install a traffic signal and interconnect. $578,400
5 CIP 5337 Crow Canyon Rd. / Service
Center Traffic Signal
Install a traffic signal and interconnect. $557,100
6 CIP 5338 San Ramon Valley Blvd. /
Westside Dr. Traffic Signal
Install a traffic signal and interconnect. $476,000
7 CIP 5363 San Ramon Valley Blvd.

Curb Installation
Install a concrete curb and gutter along the east
side of San Ramon Valley Boulevard. $340,000
8 CIP 5364 San Ramon Valley Blvd. /
Hooper Dr. Traffic Signal
Install a traffic signal and interconnect when
warranted. $608,700
9 CIP 5365 Camino Ramon Office Park
Intersection Improvements
Widen the driveway at the intersection to provide
a single entrance lane, a left/through exit lane,
and a right turn only exit lane from the Commons
Office Park Center.
$625,500
10 CIP 905412 Crow Canyon Rd. /
Shoreline Dr. Intersection
Widen the southerly side of Crow Canyon Road
west of Shoreline Drive to accommodate
eastbound right turn traffic.
$250,200
11 CIP 975413 Pedestrian
Enhancements3
Install devices to increase awareness of pedestrian
activity as warranted. $0
12 CIP 5459 Montevideo Dr. /
Broadmoor Dr. Traffic Signal
Install a traffic signal and interconnect. $518,100
13 CIP 5460 Pine Valley Road /
Broadmoor Drive Traffic Signal
Install a traffic signal and interconnect.
$658,200
14 CIP 5506 Old Crow Canyon Rd.

Corridor Improvement
Widen the roadway to provide a minimum 60-
foot right of way complete with curb, gutter, and
sidewalk.
$6,739,200
15 CIP 905531 Crow Canyon Rd. / Iron
Horse Trail Bicycle Pedestrian
Overcrossing
Construct a bicycle/pedestrian overcrossing on
the Iron Horse Trail over Crow Canyon Road. $20,700,000

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
6 Notes:
1: Project numbers 1-9 and 12-15 are part of the current SRTIF program; project numbers 10, 11, and 16-24 are shaded in gray and are proposed to be added to the program as a result of this nexus update. 2: Citywide or multi-location projects.

Sources: City of San Ramon, 2022.
3: Ped Enhancement projects are Citywide project that are typically included on an as needed basis. The project was included in the list and the percent of trips was calculated as part of the analysis to be considered for future fee calculations. 4: Smart Signals project is a Countywide project that the City is part of. The portion of this project that includes City’s intersections was included in the list and the percent of trips was calculated as part of the analysis to be considered for future fee calculations. 16 CIP 905613 Citywide Bicycle Network
Improvements & Enhancements2
Improve and upgrade the City’s Bicycle Network
as outlined in the City’s Bicycle Master Plan. $50,443,500 17 CIP 975481 Radar Speed Display
Sign2
Install speed display signs. $52,650
18 CIP 975594 Citywide Intelligent
Transportation System Upgrade2
Plan and upgrade necessary intelligent
transportation system components. $41,852,900
19 CIP 000010 Bike Master Plan Update2 Future update of the citywide Bicycle Master Plan. $176,000 20 CIP 000012 ITS Master Plan Update2 Future update of the citywide ITS Master Plan. $110,000 21 CIP 000011 Local Roadway Safety
Plan Projects2
Implementation of recommended projects from
the LRSP. $2,086,900
22 CIP 000007 Future Nexus Study
Update2
Future update of the SRTIF Nexus Study. $80,000
23 CIP ###### Smart Signals Project2,4 Upgrade countywide traffic signal system and communication system. $248,175
24 CIP 905625 Bollinger Canyon Rd
Sidewalk Improvement
Widen sidewalk on Bollinger Canyon Rd from
Alcosta Blvd to Canyon Lakes Dr to improve the
Class III pedestrian and bicyclist route and
construct a northbound right turn lane on Alcosta
Blvd.
$891,955
TOTAL $133,011,180

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
7 3. Growth Projections
An important element of every fee calculation is the estimate of future growth in the fee area.

Projections by Land Use Category
This nexus update uses growth projections that were recently prepared for the purposes of the Tri-Valley Transportation Council (TVTC) Fee update. While the TVTC Update used a base year of 2018, this TIF update uses 2023 as its base year for the purposes of land use growth and ultimately, the fee calculations. However, both the TVTC Update, and this nexus study, use a horizon year of 2040.

To establish the 2023 base year, the TVTC land use projections were interpolated between the base year (2018) and the horizon year (2040). The land use information was summarized at the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) geographic level, the geographic unit used in the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) countywide travel demand model. For summary purposes, the total growth projected in the City of San Ramon is summarized in Table 3.

Table 3: Citywide Growth Projections
Category 2018 Base Year for
TVTC Update
2023 Base Year for
SRTIF Update 2040 Projection 2023-2040 Growth
Population 79,931 85,005 102,258 22%
Dwelling Units 27,739 29,885 37,180 26%
Jobs 50,539 52,468 59,027 13%
Source: TVTC Nexus Update Technical Memorandum #1 –Tri-Valley Growth Forecast, Kimley-Horn and Associates, February 2021; Fehr & Peers, 2021.

Trip Generation by Land Use
This study establishes a common basis for assessing fees across different land use categories by calculating a Trip Demand Factor (TDF), which reflects the trip generation characteristics of each land use that produces new vehicle trips on the roadway system in San Ramon. The characteristics of each land use category used in the TDF calculation include the trip generation rate, the proportion of new and pass-by trips, and average trip lengths. This process is the same as the process used in the 2016 TIF Update, though the values for each variable have been updated as more recent information was available at the time this nexus study was conducted.

For the purposes of this study, PM peak-hour trip generation rates have been drawn from the Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The percentages of new and pass-by trips are used as-is from the 2016 TIF Update, because the source of the

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
8 data referenced in that study remains the industry standard. Trip lengths have been updated by referencing the 2012 California Household Travel Survey data, which presents observed trip lengths for each city and county in the state. The variables used in the calculations are shown on Table 4.

Table 4: Trip Demand Factors
Fee Category Unit ITE Code Peak Hour
Trip Rate1
New Trip
Percentage2
Average Trip
Length3
Adjusted PM
Peak Trip
Demand
Factor4
Residential
Single Family Unit 210 0.94 97% 7.50 0.88
Multi-family Unit 220 0.51 97% 7.50 0.48
Nonresidential
Retail KSF 820 3.4 78% 5.06 1.72
Office KSF 710 1.44 96% 12.18 2.16

1. Reflects average number of trips at peak hour of day for the unit type indicated based on data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition).

2. This factor accounts for the fact that some trips generated by the land uses will be pass-by or otherwise pre-existing trips.

Source is Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates, SANDAG, April 2002.

3. Average trip length in miles based on the California Household Travel Survey, 2012, for the City of San Ramon. Residential land use category uses total average of all trips, Retail uses “Home-Based Other” average, and the Office and Other non-residential categories are based on “Home-Based Work” trip lengths.

4. The calculation of the Adjusted PM Peak Trip Demand Factor is the peak hour trip rate multiplied by the new trip percentage, then multiplied by the average trip length and divided by the county-wide average trip length of 7.80 miles.

Source: San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update, Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., February 2016; Fehr & Peers, 2021.

Once the adjusted PM Peak-hour Trip Demand Factors are determined, they are then used to calculate the total growth in Adjusted PM Peak-hour Trips. The level of growth projected to occur in the City of San Ramon was taken from the Tri-Valley Transportation Fee land use growth updates calculated previously, and Table 5 displays how that growth was multiplied by the Trip Demand factors to derive total growth expressed in units of Adjusted PM Peak Trips. Overall, these calculations result in an estimated 14.5-percent increase in Adjusted PM Peak Trips citywide between 2023 and 2040.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
9 Table 5: Growth Converted to Adjusted PM Peak Trips
Land Use Type # of Dwelling Units
or # of Employees
KSF (for nonresidential
categories)
Adjusted PM Peak
Trip Demand
Factor
Adjusted PM Peak
Trips
Existing (2023)
Single Family 22,449 0.88 19,674
Multi-family 7,436 0.48 3,536
Retail Employment 7,722 3,012 1.72 5,182
Non-Retail Employment 44,746 20,807 2.16 44,927
Total 73,319
Future (2040)
Single Family 24,974 0.88 21,887
Multi-family 12,206 0.48 5,804
Retail Employment 9,126 3,559 1.72 6,124
Non-Retail Employment 49,901 23,204 2.16 50,102
Total 83,917
Growth (2023 - 2040)
Single Family 2,525 0.88 2,213
Multi-family 4,770 0.48 2,268
Retail Employment 1,404 548 1.72 942
Non-Retail Employment 5,155 2,397 2.16 5,176
Total # 10,599
Total % 14.5%
Source: TVTC Nexus Update Technical Memorandum #1 –Tri-Valley Growth Forecast, Kimley-Horn and Associates, February 2021; Fehr & Peers, 2021.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
10 4. AB 602 Analysis
Assembly Bill (AB) 602 was approved on September 28, 2021 and went into effect on January 1, 2022.

Among other things, this bill requires that impact fee nexus studies adopted on and after January 1, 2022, must, as appropriate, identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the new level of service for the public facility once an improvement (project) is constructed, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is necessary. It should be noted that the basis for the required level of service analyses is not specifically defined in AB 602 and that as a practical matter, level of service methods applied to various public facilities need to vary depending on the type of facility being analyzed and the information available.

AB 602 also requires that studies adopted after July 1, 2022, must calculate fees levied or imposed on a housing development projects proportionately to the square footage of the proposed units or make specified findings explaining why square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate the fee. Simply, development impact fees must be stratified by the size of the housing unit or provide findings that support not stratifying the fees. Therefore, an AB 602 deficiency analysis and fee stratification analysis were conducted as part of the SRTIF Nexus Study.

The AB 602 analysis evaluated 17 projects, summarized in Table 6, which involved improvements to public facilities. The projects identified for the required level of service (LOS) analysis per AB 602 were categorized as either an intersection, pedestrian/bicycle, or safety improvement. The remaining projects are either Citywide studies or require identification of technology-based solutions. As these are not specific public facilities, no Measure of Effectiveness (MOE) or thresholds were established at this time. AB 602 acknowledges that level of service analysis is not possible for certain types of projects.

Table 6: Projects Analyzed in AB 602 Analysis
Number Project Improvement Type
1 Camino Ramon Shopping Center Intersection Improvements Intersection 2 Bollinger Canyon Rd. / Crow Canyon Rd. Intersection
3 Fostoria Way Widening Roadway Capacity
4 Bollinger Canyon Rd. / Norris Canyon Rd. Traffic Signal Intersection 5 Crow Canyon Rd. / Service Center Traffic Signal Intersection 6 San Ramon Valley Blvd. / Westside Dr. Traffic Signal Intersection 7 San Ramon Valley Blvd. Curb Installation Safety
8 San Ramon Valley Blvd. / Hooper Dr. Traffic Signal Intersection 9 Camino Ramon Office Park Intersection Improvements Intersection 10 Crow Canyon Rd. / Shoreline Dr. Intersection Intersection 12 Montevideo Dr. / Broadmoor Dr. Traffic Signal Intersection

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
11 Table 6: Projects Analyzed in AB 602 Analysis
Number Project Improvement Type
13 Pine Valley Road / Broadmoor Drive Traffic Signal Intersection 14 Old Crow Canyon Rd. Corridor Improvement Safety
15 Crow Canyon Rd. / Iron Horse Trail Bicycle Pedestrian Overcrossing Pedestrian / Bicycle
16 Citywide Bicycle Network Improvements & Enhancements Pedestrian / Bicycle 21 Local Roadway Safety Plan Projects Safety
24 Bollinger Canyon Rd. Sidewalk Improvement Safety
Level of Service Analysis Methodology
Table 7 summarizes the methodology and MOE that was used to determine existing and future conditions depending on the type of improvement.

Table 7: Methodology and Measure of Effectiveness
Improvement Type Methodology Measure of Effectiveness
Intersection HCM Intersection LOS (Delay)
Roadway Capacity Volume-to-Capacity (V/C) V/C
Safety
Caltrans Local Roadway Safety Manual
(LRSM)
Federal Highway Authority’s (FHWA)
Clearing House guide
Crash Rate
Pedestrian/Bicycle Montgomery County Level of Traffic
Stress Level of Traffic Stress (LTS)
Note: HCM = Highway Capacity Manual, LOS = Level of Service As the TIF Nexus is based on the PM peak-hour trip demand in the future, the LOS analysis for AB 602 was conducted for the PM peak-hour.

Intersection
Analysis of intersection level of service (LOS) is based on the Highway Capacity Manual’s (HCM) concept of LOS. The HCM defines the LOS of a facility as a qualitative measure used to describe operational conditions.

LOS ranges from A (free flow traffic with minimal delay) to F (heavy congestion operating near or over capacity). LOS was determined using methodologies defined in HCM 6th Edition, the current edition at the time of the analysis. The LOS criteria is summarized in Table 8.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
12 Existing condition traffic counts during the PM peak period (4 PM – 6 PM) were collected in August 2022.

Future 2040 No Build and 2040 Build volumes were developed by adding travel demand model growth to existing counts. The travel demand model maintained by Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA model) was used to determine future traffic growth.

Table 8: Intersection Level of Service Criteria
Level of Service
(LOS)
Signalized
Delay (sec/veh)
Unsignalized
Delay (sec/veh)
A ≤ 10 ≤ 10
B > 10.0 – 20.0 > 10.0 – 15.0
C > 20.0 – 35.0 > 15.0 – 25.0
D > 35.0 – 55.0 > 25.0 – 35.0
E > 55.0 – 80.0 > 35.0 – 50.0
F > 80.0 > 50.0
Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition
Note: For All-way stop-control intersection (AWSC), LOS is defined based on average intersection delay. For two-way stop-controlled intersections (TWSC), LOS is defined based on the worst movement delay.

According to the San Ramon General Plan 2035, the City aims to maintain LOS C or better as the standard at all intersections, with a threshold of LOS D during AM (7-9 AM) and PM (4-6 PM) peak-hours. Therefore, for this analysis intersections calculated to operate at LOS E or LOS F were determined to be deficient.

Roadway Capacity
Roadway capacity improvements were evaluated based on the volume-to-capacity ratio (V/C). To determine the V/C ratio for the projects, the project’s volume was divided by the roadway capacity obtained from the CCTA model. For the purposes of this study, and based on observed data, Table 9 shows the LOS designations based on whether the V/C ratio is greater or less than 1.0. Note that while the City aims to maintain a LOS D or better on its roadways, for the purposes of this analysis a deficient roadway is one that operates with a V/C ratio greater than 1.0.

Existing condition volumes for the study roadway segments were collected from the Replica Big Data platform. Replica provides travel data by mode as well as by roadway segments. Future 2040 No Build and 2040 Build volumes were developed by adding model growth to existing volumes.

Table 9: Roadway Level of Service Criteria
Level of Service
(LOS) Volume-to Capacity Ratio
≤ E ≤ 1.0
F > 1.0

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
13 Safety
The number of crashes per million vehicle miles travelled (crash/M-VMT) was calculated for the project segments based on the observed number of crashes within 5 years (January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2021). The reduction in crashes in the Future 2040 Build scenario was calculated by applying Crash Modification Factors (CMF) based on proposed safety improvements for each project. As mentioned in the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Highway Safety Manual (HSM), roadway safety performance can be measured based on the threshold performance value that is determined subjectively for a given roadway conditions.

As recommended in the HSM, the safety of infrastructure should be measured by the number of crashes per million-VMT (crash/M-VMT). For the purposes of this study, and based on industry standard practices, the safety threshold value was determined to be crash per million-VMT (crash/M-VMT) greater than 1.0.

Table 10 summarizes the LOS designations for safety that were used for this study.

Table 10: Safety Level of Service Criteria
Level of Service
(LOS) Crash / MVMT
≤ E ≤ 1.0
F > 1.0
Pedestrian and Bicycle
Pedestrian and Bicycle improvements were evaluated using the modified level of traffic stress (LTS) methodology used in the Montgomery County, Maryland Bicycle Master Plan1. This methodology is based on the original LTS methodology developed in 2012 by the Mineta Transportation Institute and San Jose State University2, but revised to better capture stress levels. Both methodologies assign a traffic stress level based on street/traffic attributes (e.g., traffic speed, traffic volume, number of lanes, etc.). As shown in Table 11, the original LTS has four stress levels, while the Montgomery County methodology provides three additional stress levels. The Montgomery County methodology also revised criteria for separated bikeways, two-lane roads, and industrial streets. For the purposes of this analysis, a threshold of LTS 4 was used to determine whether a project was deficient prior to the improvement being constructed. 1 Montgomery County, MD The Bicycle Master Plan Appendix D, 2018 2 Mekuria, Maaza, Peter G. Furth, and Hilary Nixon, Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity, San Jose, CA: Mineta Transportation Institute, 2012

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
14 Table 11: Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) categories
Level of Service
(LOS) Crash / MVMT
LTS 1 – Very Low
LTS 0 – None
LTS 1 – Very Low
LTS 2 –Low LTS 2 – Low
LTS 3 – Moderate
LTS 2.5 – Moderate Low
LTS 3 – Moderate High
LTS 4 - High
LTS 4 – High
LTS 5 – Very High
Pedestrian and bicycle overcrossings were evaluated based on criteria summarized in Table 12, which is based on posted speed limit, median refuge, and number of lanes being traversed. Improvements for pedestrians and bicyclists along roadways were evaluated based on criteria summarized in Table 13, which are based on the posted speed limit and the type of buffer between the shared path and adjacent roadways.

Table 12: Level of Traffic Stress Criteria – Ped/Bike Overcrossing Posted Speed Limit on
Street Being Crossed
(mph)
# Lanes of Street Being Crossed
No Median Refuge Median Refuge (≥ 6 ft wide)
2-3 4-5 6+ 2-3 4-5 6+
≤ 25 LTS 1 LTS 2 LTS 4 LTS 1 LTS 1 LTS 2
30 LTS 2 LTS 2.5 LTS 4 LTS 1 LTS 2 LTS 2.5
35 LTS 2.5 LTS 3 LTS 4 LTS 1 LTS 2.5 LTS 3
≥ 40 LTS 3 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 2 LTS 2.5 LTS 4
Source: Montgomery County, MD. The Bicycle Master Plan Appendix D, 2018.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
15 Table 13: Level of Traffic Stress Criteria – Roadway Improvements for Ped/Bike Posted
Speed
Limit
(mph)
# Lanes of Street Being Crossed
Mixed Traffic, No Parking Mixed Traffic, Parking
2-3 4-5 6+ 2-3 4-5 6+
≤ 25 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 4 LTS 2.5 LTS 3 LTS 4
30 LTS 3 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 3 LTS 4 LTS 4
35 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4
40 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4 LTS 4
Posted
Speed
Limit
(mph)
# Lanes of Street Being Crossed
Bike Lanes (< 5.5 ft), No Parking Bike Lanes (≥ 6 ft), No Parking Bike Lanes, Parking 2-3 4-5 6+ 2-3 4-5 6+ 2-3 4-5 6+
≤ 25 LTS 2 LTS 2.5 (2)ALTS 3 LTS 1 LTS 2.5 (2)ALTS 3 LTS 2.5 (2)ALTS 3 LTS 3 30 LTS 2 LTS 2.5 (2)ALTS 3 LTS 2 LTS 2.5 (2)ALTS 3 LTS 2.5 LTS 3 LTS 3 35 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 3 40 LTS 3 LTS 4(3)ALTS 3 LTS 3 LTS 4(3)ALTS 3 N/A N/A N/A Posted
Speed
Limit
(mph)
# Lanes of Street Being Crossed
Separated Bike Lanes, < 5ft Separated Bike Lanes, ≥ 5ft Shared Use, Independent ROW 2-3 4-5 6+ 2-3 4-5 6+ 2-3 4-5 6+
≤ 25 LTS 2 (1)BLTS 2 (1)BLTS 2 (1)BLTS 1 LTS 1 LTS 1 LTS 0 LTS 0 LTS 0 30 LTS 2 (1)BLTS 2 (1)BLTS 2 (1)BLTS 1 LTS 1 LTS 1 LTS 0 LTS 0 LTS 0 35 LTS 2 (1)BLTS 2 (1)BLTS 2 (1)BLTS 1 LTS 1 LTS 1 LTS 0 LTS 0 LTS 0 40 LTS 2 LTS 2 LTS 2 LTS 2 (1)CLTS 2 (1)CLTS 2 (1)CLTS 0 LTS 0 LTS 0 Source: Montgomery County, MD. The Bicycle Master Plan Appendix D, 2018.

Note: A=LTS if there is a raised median, B=LTS if a road is residential, and buffer is at least 5 feet, C=LTS if buffer is wide.

Level of Service Results
This section presents a summary of results for each project. Detailed analysis tables and outputs are included in Appendix B.

Intersection
Intersection LOS analysis was completed for Projects 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13. Table 14 presents a summary of the intersection LOS. Note that as discussed previously, LOS is presented in terms of the PM Peak-hour.

Project 1 evaluated the Camino Ramon intersection with Shopping Plaza Driveway. This intersection operates at LOS F in existing and future conditions, which would be considered an existing deficiency.

Project 1 will improve operations by decreasing the delay for the worst movement by 60-percent.

Project 2 evaluated the Bollinger Canyon Road intersection with Crow Canyon Road. Future development will increase congestion and deteriorate the existing LOS from B to C. Project 2 will slightly improve operations by decreasing the overall delay for the intersection, although the LOS will remain the same.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
16 Project 4 evaluated the Bollinger Canyon Road intersection with Norris Canyon Road. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing LOS from C to D. Project 4 will signalize the intersection and improve operations to LOS B.

Project 5 evaluated the Crow Canyon Road intersection with Service Center. This intersection operates at LOS C in existing and future conditions. Future development will slightly increase delay at this intersection.

Project 5 will signalize the intersection and improve operations to LOS A.

Project 6 evaluated the San Ramon Boulevard intersection with Westside Drive. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing LOS from C to D. Project 6 will signalize the intersection and improve operations to LOS A.

Project 8 evaluated the San Ramon Valley Boulevard intersection with Hooper Drive. It is estimated that future development will deteriorate the existing LOS from C to D. Project 8 will signalize the intersection and improve operations to LOS A.

Project 9 evaluated the Camino Ramon intersection with Office Park Drive. This intersection operates at LOS F in existing and future conditions, which would be considered as an existing deficiency. Project 9 will improve operations by decreasing the delay for the worst movement by 60-percent.

Project 10 evaluated the Crow Canyon Road intersection with Shoreline Drive. This intersection currently operates at LOS A. It is expected that future development will slightly increase the delay at this intersection while it continues to operate at LOS A. Project 10 will decrease intersection delay.

Project 12 evaluated the Broadmoor Drive intersection with Montevideo Drive. This intersection operates at LOS B in existing and future conditions. Future development will slightly increase congestion at this intersection. Project 12 will signalize the intersection and decrease intersection delay.

Project 13 evaluated the Broadmoor Drive intersection with Pine Valley Road. This intersection operates at LOS B in existing and future conditions. Future development will slightly increase congestion at this intersection. and Project 13 will signalize the intersection and decrease intersection delay.

Table 14: Intersection Level of Service Summary
Existing Project Existing 2040 No Project 2040 Project
Control
Type
Control
Type
Movement
Delay
sec/veh LOS Delaysec/veh LOS Delaysec/veh LOS

1. Camino Ramon & Shopping
Plaza TWSC TWSC
All 9.5 A 102.8 F 37.8 E
EB 75.7 F 875.1 F 308.6 F

2. Bollinger Canyon Road &
Crow Canyon Road Signal Signal
All 18.3 B 21.3 C 21.3 C
SB 46.7 D 47.7 D 46.6 D

4. Bollinger Canyon Road & Norris
Canyon Road AWSC Signal
All 16.3 C 26.5 D 12.8 B
WB 18.4 C 35.2 E 11.7 B

5. Crow Canyon Road & Service
Center TWSC Signal
All 0.4 A 0.5 A 5.5 A
NB 19.5 C 32.1 D 28.1 C

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
17 Table 14: Intersection Level of Service Summary
Existing Project Existing 2040 No Project 2040 Project
Control
Type
Control
Type
Movement
Delay
sec/veh LOS Delaysec/veh LOS Delaysec/veh LOS

6. San Ramon Boulevard &
Western Drive TWSC Signal
All 1.1 A 9.3 A 15.1 B
EB 16.1 C 306.7 F 17.7 B

8. San Ramon boulevard & Hooper
Drive TWSC Signal
All 1.2 A 4.9 A 6.1 A
EB 14.4 B 51.7 F 11.7 B

9. Camino Ramon & Office Park
Drive TWSC TWSC
All 7.4 A 36.5 E 14.9 B
EB 63.2 F 429.6 F 172.6 F

10. Crow Canyon Road & Shoreline
Drive Signal Signal
All 6.3 A 7.3 A 6.2 A
NB 37.6 D 37.6 D 37.6 D

12. Broadmoor Drive &
Montevideo Drive AWSC Signal
All 11.1 B 13.2 B 6.4 B
WB 12.0 B 15.3 C 5.9 A

13. Broadmoor Drive & Pine Valley
Road AWSC Signal
All 12.7 B 15.5 C 6.8 A
WB 14.2 B 19.0 C 6.3 A
Note:

Intersections that operate at LOS E or F are Bold.

Intersection and All-way stop-control intersection (AWSC) reported as intersection delay/LOS. Two-way stop-controlled intersections (TWSC) is reported as overall intersection delay/LOS followed by worst movement's delay/LOS.

Roadway Capacity
The roadway capacity evaluation was conducted for the Fostoria Way Widening Project (Project 3), and the V/C ratios are summarized in Table 15 by direction. Future development will greatly increase the V/C ratio for the westbound direction, while Project 3 will reduce the V/C ratio back to near existing conditions.

Table 15: Roadway Capacity Level of Service Summary – Project 3 Direction
# Lane (Capacity) Existing 2040 No Project 2040 Project Existing/
No Project
Project Vol V/C LOS Vol V/C LOS Vol V/C LOS
Eastbound 1
(550 veh)
2 (1600 veh) 100 0.18 ≤ E 230 0.42 ≤ E 230 0.14 ≤ E
Westbound 1
(550 veh)
2 (1600 veh) 125 0.23 ≤ E 420 0.76 ≤ E 420 0.26 ≤ E
Safety
The safety analysis evaluated Projects 7, 14, 21 and 24. Table 16 presents a summary of the safety level of service for Projects 7, 14 and 24.

For Project 7, the crash rate exceeds the crash rate threshold for existing conditions, which is considered an existing deficiency. In addition, Project 7 is forecasted to worsen into the future without improvements. It is

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
18 anticipated that the safety improvements proposed for Project 7 will reduce the crash rate to 1.0, an acceptable crash rate.

For Project 14, the crash rate exceeds the crash rate threshold for existing conditions, which is considered an existing deficiency. In addition, Project 14 is forecasted to worsen into the future without improvements.

It is anticipated that the safety improvements proposed for Project 14 will reduce the crash rate to 2.1 from

2.4, but not to an acceptable rate of 1.0.

For Project 24, the crash rate exceeds the crash rate threshold for existing conditions, which is considered an existing deficiency. In addition, Project 24 is forecasted to worsen into the future without improvements.

It is anticipated that the safety improvements proposed for Project 24 will reduce the crash rate to 1.5 from

2.1, but not to an acceptable rate of 1.0.

Table 16: Safety Analysis Summary
Project# Project Name
Existing 2040 No Project 2040 Project
Crash/
M-VMT LOS Crash/M-VMT LOS Crash/M-VMT LOS
Project 7 San Ramon Valley Blvd. Curb
Installation 1.1 F 1.1 F 1.0 ≤ E
Project 14 Old Crow Canyon Rd. Corridor
Improvement 2.4 F 2.4 F 2.1 F
Project 24 Bollinger Canyon Rd. Sidewalk
Improvement 2.1 F 2.1 F 1.5 F
Project 21 will implement safety countermeasures at the highest collision locations in the City that were identified in the City’s most recent Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP). Table 17 presents the safety analysis summary for these safety improvement projects. As shown in Table 17, five locations have crash rates that exceed the crash rate threshold established for this study for existing conditions, which is considered an existing deficiency at these locations. It is anticipated that the safety improvements proposed for Project 21 will reduce the crash rate compared to No Project conditions.

Table 17: Safety Analysis Summary – Project 21
Project Segment
Existing 2040 No Project 2040 Project
Crash/
M-VMT LOS Crash/M-VMT LOS Crash/M-VMT LOS
Crow Canyon Rd between Bollinger Canyon
& San Ramon Valley Blvd 1.1 F 1.1 F 0.8 ≤ E
Crow Canyon Rd between San Ramon Valley
Blvd & Camino Ramon 7.1 F 7.1 F 4.9 F
Crow Canyon Rd between Camino Ramon &
Dougherty Rd 0.2 ≤ E 0.2 ≤ E 0.1 ≤ E

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
19 Table 17: Safety Analysis Summary – Project 21
Project Segment
Existing 2040 No Project 2040 Project
Crash/
M-VMT LOS Crash/M-VMT LOS Crash/M-VMT LOS
Bollinger Canyon Rd between San Ramon
Valley Blvd & Camino Ramon 6.3 F 6.3 F 4.4 F
Bollinger Canyon Rd between Camino
Ramon & Dougherty Rd (N) 0.4 ≤ E 0.4 ≤ E 0.3 ≤ E
Bollinger Canyon Rd between Dougherty Rd
(N) & E Branch Pkwy 0.6 ≤ E 0.6 ≤ E 0.4 ≤ E
Bollinger Canyon Rd between E Branch Pkwy
& South City Limit 0.4 ≤ E 0.4 ≤ E 0.2 ≤ E
San Ramon Valley Blvd between North City
Limit & Norris Canyon Rd 1.0 ≤ E 1.0 ≤ E 0.7 ≤ E
San Ramon Valley Blvd between Norris
Canyon Rd & Pine Valley Rd 0.5 ≤ E 0.5 ≤ E 0.4 ≤ E
San Ramon Valley Blvd between Pine Valley
Rd & Alcosta Blvd 0.1 ≤ E 0.1 ≤ E 0.1 ≤ E
Camino Ramon between Fostoria Wy &
Bollinger Canyon Rd 0.6 ≤ E 0.6 ≤ E 0.4 ≤ E
Montevideo Dr between San Ramon Valley
Blvd & Alcosta Blvd 0.7 ≤ E 0.7 ≤ E 0.5 ≤ E
Alcosta Blvd between San Ramon Valley Blvd
& Old Ranch Rd 2.5 F 2.5 F 1.7 F
Alcosta Blvd between Old Ranch Rd & Crow
Canyon Rd 0.2 ≤ E 0.2 ≤ E 0.1 ≤ E
Broadmoor Dr between Pine Valley Rd &
Montevideo Dr 5.4 F 5.4 F 3.7 F
Norris Canyon Rd between Twin Creeks Dr &
Alcosta Blvd 0.5 ≤ E 0.5 ≤ E 0.4 ≤ E
Pine Valley Rd between San Ramon Valley
Blvd & Alcosta Blvd 0.4 ≤ E 0.4 ≤ E 0.3 ≤ E
Pedestrian and Bicycle
The pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing analysis was conducted for Projects 15 and 16. The level of traffic stress (LTS) is summarized in Table 18 and Table 19 for Project 15 and Project 16, respectively.

Project 15 will construct a pedestrian and bicyclist overcrossing on the Iron Horse Trail over Crow Canyon Road. The Iron Horse Trail crossing at Crow Canyon Road has a LTS of 4 for existing conditions, which is an existing deficiency. The crossing under No Project conditions will continue to have a LTS of 4 for future conditions. Project 15 will improve the LTS from 4 to 0 for future conditions.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
20 Table 18: Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing Level of Traffic Stress Summary
Project
Existing 2040 No Project 2040 Project
Crossing Road
Attribute LTS Crossing RoadAttribute LTS Crossing RoadAttribute LTS

15. Crow Canyon Rd / Iron
Horse Trail Bicycle Pedestrian
Overcrossing
40 mph
Median Refuge
(>6 ft)
6+ Lanes
4 40 mph
Median Refuge
(>6 ft)
6+ Lanes
4 - 0-2
Project 16 will improve and upgrade the City's Bicycle Network as outlined in the City's most recent Bicycle Master Plan. Out of several projects that are recommended as part of the Bicycle Master Plan, nine projects were identified as top tier projects that are going to provide greater benefits by meeting demand and connecting key destinations. Many of these top tier projects have been completed, and therefore, the analysis was conducted for the remaining projects. Table 19 summarizes the LTS evaluated for these projects. It should be noted that Table 19 provides a range of LTS values as many of the project corridors consist of segments with different attributes evaluated for LTS. The top tier project corridors have at least one segment at LTS 4 for existing conditions, which is considered an existing deficiency. These corridors will continue to have an LTS of 4 for future No Project conditions. Implementing Project 16 will improve the LTS to between 0 and 2.

Table 19: Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing Level of Traffic Stress Summary Bicycle Master Plan ID
Existing 2040 No Project 2040 Project
Segment Attribute LTS Segment Attribute LTS Segment Attribute LTS #1 – Alcosta Boulevard
Varies1
35-40 mph
4 Lanes
Some Parking2
Raised Median
3-4
Varies1
35-40 mph
4 Lanes
Some Parking2
Raised Median
3-4
Separated Bike
Lane/Multi-Use
Path
35-40 mph
4 lanes
0-2
#2 – Bollinger Canyon Road
Varies1
30-50 mph
2-8 Lanes
Some Parking2
Various Median3
2-4
Varies1
30-50 mph
2-8 Lanes
Some Parking2
Various Median3
2-4
Separated Bike
Lane/Multi-Use
Path
30-50 mph
2-8 lanes
0-2
#6 – Dougherty Road
Bike Lanes, 5-7 ft
50 mph
6 Lanes
No Parking
Raised Median
4 Bike Lanes, 5-7 ft
50 mph
6 Lanes
No Parking
Raised Median
4 Separated/Buffered
Bike Lane
50 mph
6 lanes
2 #14 – Old Ranch Road
Mixed Traffic
35 mph
4 Lanes
No Parking
Raised Median
4 Mixed Traffic
35 mph
4 Lanes
No Parking
Raised Median
4 Multi-Use Path 0

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
21 Table 19: Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing Level of Traffic Stress Summary Bicycle Master Plan ID
Existing 2040 No Project 2040 Project
Segment Attribute LTS Segment Attribute LTS Segment Attribute LTS #15 – San Ramon Valley
Boulevard
Varies1
35-45 mph
4-6 Lanes
No Parking
Raised Median
2-4
Varies1
35-45 mph
4-6 Lanes
No Parking
Raised Median
2-4
Separated Bike Lane
35-45 mph
4-6 lanes
1-2
Note:
1 Corridor includes segments with mixed traffic, bicycle lanes, and/or buffered bicycle lanes 2 Corridor includes segments with on-street parking and no parking 3 Corridor includes segments with various median types (i.e. raised median, two-way left-turn lanes, undivided) Housing Analysis
As mentioned previously, AB 602 requires that studies either calculate a fee levied or imposed on housing development projects proportionately to the square footage of the proposed units or make specified findings explaining why square footage is not an appropriate metric to calculate the fees. Simply, development impact fees must be stratified by the size of the housing unit or provide findings that support not stratifying the fees. In order to guide future analysis requirements and help inform the City of San Ramon as to how AB 602 may impact the SRTIF program in regards to the housing fee stratification requirement, an analysis was conducted to evaluate housing fees by housing size.

The analysis relied on cross-tabulation of the following three data sources:
· The average number vehicle trips generated by household size (i.e., number of persons in the household) derived from a Big Data platform (Replica) for a typical weekday (Thursday) in the Fall of 2019
· The number of single-family housing units in categories of persons per household and square footage of units estimated from the 2019 US Census’ American Housing Survey (AHS) · Building permits by square footage for single family units constructed within the City of San Ramon and the surrounding areas between 2019 and 2021
The trip generation information was combined with the number of single-family detached units in crosstabulated categories of persons per household and total household square footage. This resulted in estimates of vehicle trip rates and equivalent dwelling units (EDUs) for each square footage category established as a part of this analysis. This data was combined with the square footage data for single-family housing units built in the City and the surrounding between 2019 and 2021. The housing size data was provided by agencies in Contra Costa County and Alameda County. The resultant dataset was used as the basis for evaluating whether future Nexus Study updates should consider square footage in the development of the fee schedule. The major analysis processes are discussed in detail in the following sections.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
22 Replica Big Data
Replica is a big data platform that provides demographic and travel data based on multiple data collection sources such as mobile location data, merchant transaction data, census data, land use data, and observed “ground-truth” mobility data. Data from Replica’s Fall 2019 typical Thursday dataset for the Contra Costa County and Alameda County was used to estimate the number of vehicle trips by persons per household.

Table 20 summarizes the trip generation rates for each household category.

Table 20: City of San Ramon Trip Generation Data – Replica 2019 Persons per Household Households Trips
PM Peak Period
Home-Based Vehicle Trips
1 4,510 2,759 0.61
2 6,560 8,267 1.26
3 5,152 7,435 1.44
4 6,641 10,038 1.51
5 1,836 3,299 1.80
6 604 1,427 2.36
7+ 315 919 2.92
Total 25,618 34,144
Average 1.33
Source: Replica Fall 2019 Thursday Dataset.

American Housing Survey
The American Housing Survey (AHS), which is conducted by the Bureau of the Census for the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), collects data on the nation's housing, including data on household characteristics and demographics.

The AHS data is collected in odd numbered years only. The most recent available survey data from 2019 was used, which is consistent with the trip data collected from Replica. The AHS was designed to include two samples, the National sample, and the independent Metropolitan sample. The metropolitan areas that are surveyed and the size of the surveys have been reduced over recent years. While these measures have reduced costs, they also limit the localized data available.

As the AB 602 analysis requires trip generation to be defined by square footage, housing units were cross tabulated by three variables: structure type, square footage, and total persons in the household. This crosstabulation requires an adequate sample size for each category. The closest available metropolitan area for the City of San Ramon region was the City of San Jose. However, the San Jose metropolitan area sample size limits its ability to provide information for all square-footage categories and may not be representative of housing in the City of San Ramon. In addition, the tools available from the Census Bureau to create crosstabulations from the AHS for the purposes of this analysis indicate that the only sample that can provide a statistically relevant sample for the three required variables is the full national sample. Thus, it was decided that the national sample from the 2019 AHS should be used to define the number of single-family housing

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
23 units by persons per household and by the square footage of the housing unit. This data is summarized in Table 21.

Table 21: No. of Single-Family Unit Detached Structures by AHS Square Foot Category Persons per
Household
Total
Units
<500
s.f.
500 to
749 s.f.
750 to
999 s.f.
1,000 to
1,499
s.f.
1,500 to
1,999
s.f.
2,000 to
2,499
s.f.
2,500 to
2,999
s.f.
3,000 to
3,999
s.f.
>4,000
s.f.

Size
Unknown
1 16,263 153 372 1,483 4,643 3,800 2,184 929 755 366 1,581 2 28,900 88 270 1,260 6,215 7,234 5,211 3,008 2,636 1,316 1,663 3 13,019 0 102 711 2,744 3,238 2,383 1,270 1,264 523 742 4 12,145 0 93 381 2,111 2,702 2,368 1,519 1,533 819 588 5 5,579 0 29 184 948 1,291 1,066 606 731 342 377
6 2,184 19 0 67 443 417 342 218 346 179 136
7+ 1,245 0 0 40 241 257 195 148 134 98 115
Average per
Household 2.66 1.70 2.00 2.24 2.47 2.62 2.76 2.88 3.06 3.11 2.50 Trip Generation by Categories of Square Footage
The number of trips by household size and persons per household, as well as the estimation of the average trip generation rate for each of the AHS square footage categories, are summarized in Table 22. The trip generation rates were estimated using the following steps:
· Multiply the trip generation rate for a category of “persons per household” estimated from Replica’s trip generation data (see Table 21) by the number of single-family units in each AHS square footage category for that same number of persons per household
· Sum the number of trips generated by all households in an AHS square footage category and divide by the total number of households in that square footage category.

The differences in trip rates for each household categories shown in Table 22, along with data on recent housing square footages built in the City’s surrounding region, were used to establish the EDU for each AHS square footage category.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
24 Table 22: Peak Vehicle Trips for All Households in Each AHS Square Foot Category Persons per
Household
Total
Trips
<500
s.f.
500 to
749 s.f.
750 to
999 s.f.
1,000 to
1,499
s.f.
1,500 to
1,999
s.f.
2,000 to
2,499
s.f.
2,500 to
2,999
s.f.
3,000 to
3,999
s.f.
>4,000
s.f.

Size
Unknown
1 9,949 94 228 907 2,840 2,325 1,336 568 462 224 967
2 36,420 111 340 1,588 7,832 9,116 6,567 3,791 3,322 1,658 2,096 3 18,788 0 147 1,026 3,960 4,673 3,439 1,833 1,824 755 1,071 4 18,357 0 141 576 3,191 4,084 3,579 2,296 2,317 1,238 889 5 10,025 0 52 331 1,703 2,320 1,915 1,089 1,313 615 677 6 5,160 45 0 158 1,047 985 808 515 817 423 321
7+ 3,632 0 0 117 703 750 569 432 391 286 336
Average per
Household 1.29 0.96 1.05 1.140 1.23 1.28 1.32 1.37 1.41 1.43 1.22 Recent Housing Built in Surrounding Region
Table 23 groups available data for 719 “non-age-restricted” single-family dwelling units built in the surrounding region between 2019 and 2021 by their square footage. The data indicates that the average size of the single-family dwelling units built in that three-year period was 3,131 square feet. Note that this data includes dwelling units constructed in the City of Dublin, the City of Pleasanton, and some unincorporated areas of Alameda County and Contra Costa County. Based on the analysis completed, an EDU of 1.0 was established for the “middle grouping” of single-family units between 2,500 and 2,999 square feet in size (the group in which the cumulative percentage reaches 50-percent). Setting the 1.0 EDU at this group means that housing units smaller than 2,500 square-feet were given an EDU less than 1.0 and dwelling units that are larger than 2,999 square-feet were given an EDU greater than 1.0.

Table 23: Single-Family Units Built in San Ramon’s Surrounding Region
Square Feet Units Percent
Less than 500 SF 15 2%
500 - 749 SF 18 3%
750 - 999 SF 7 1%
1,000 – 1,499 SF 6 1%
1,500 – 1,999 SF 6 1%
2,000 – 2,499 SF 161 22%
2,500 – 2,999 SF 142 20%
3,000 – 3,999 SF 179 25%
More than 4,000 SF 185 26%
Total 719 100%
Average Square Footage of Single-Family Units 3,131 SF
Note: Data collected between 2019 and 2021

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
25 Analysis Results
Table 24 summarizes the estimated EDUs for the seven recommended single-family dwelling units grouped by their square footage. Note that Table 24 contains fewer groups than Table 23 as the trip generation for dwelling units smaller than 1000 square-feet have similar trip generation characteristics resulting in the same EDU value.

The EDU values summarized in Table 24 were calculated by dividing the average number of trips per household for each group by the average trips per household for the middle (2,500 to 2,999 square feet) group. Table 24 also summarizes the calculated weighted average EDU for each of the AHS square footage categories, which is estimated by multiplying the EDU for each category by the percentage of households in that category (from the 2019 – 2021 available housing data). This calculation shows that the weighted average EDU for “non-age restricted” single-family dwelling units is 1.002, which is very close to the EDU of

1.0 that is used in estimating the average EDU set for the middle group of dwelling unit sizes (2,500 – 2,999 square-feet). Based on the analysis completed, there is evidence that trips in the PM Peak Period are correlated to the square footage of existing residences within the surrounding region of City of San Ramon and a stratified fee structure based on square footage was established as part of the AB 602 compliant Nexus Fee Study.

Table 24: Estimated EDUs for Single-Family Units by Square Foot Groupings Recommended Square
Footage Categories
Average Trip
per Household EDU1 Weighted Average EDU
Less than 1,000 SF 1.14 0.83 0.046
1,000 – 1,499 SF 1.23 0.90 0.007
1,500 – 1,999 SF 1.28 0.94 0.008
2,000 – 2,499 SF 1.32 0.97 0.217
2,500 – 2,999 SF 1.37 1.00 0.197
3,000 – 3,999 SF 1.41 1.03 0.257
More than 4,000 SF 1.43 1.04 0.269
Weighted Average of All Groups 1.002
1 Equals avg. trips per household for each grouping divided by the avg. trips per household for the middle group (1.37).

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
26 5. Nexus Allocation and Fee
Calculations
The nexus analysis process involves determining the relationship between the new development in the area subject to the fee and the cost of the improvements to be constructed. This process determines what proportion of the cost of each project would be funded by the fee program. The final result is a set of calculations for the maximum level of fee that could be applied to new development in the City of San Ramon.

Allocation to Users
The purpose of a Traffic Impact Fee (TIF) program is to provide funding for improvements to the extent necessitated by future development. To provide a quantitative estimate of future usage, the proportion of project costs attributable to new local development was evaluated using the CCTA countywide travel demand model and the citywide growth projections.

The travel model that is currently available to conduct this analysis is the Contra Costa Transportation Authority travel demand model (CCTA model). Using the CCTA model, two scenarios were run: a “baseline” year and a “future” year. For both scenarios, the Tri-Valley Transportation Fee (TVTF) land use updates were incorporated into the model, as well as the network updates coming from the SRTIF project list. For each link associated with a SRTIF project, the traffic volume was captured. It is important to run these two scenarios as the fee will be charged only to new development and is based on an evaluation of that new development’s effects on the SRTIF projects. Simply, the growth in trips attributed to new development between the baseline and future year is what will dictate the maximum fee that can be charged in the updated SRTIF.

Since the SRTIF is a local fee program, it is also important to identify the proportion of traffic on each facility that is local in nature. Local trips are those trips that start and/or end in the City of San Ramon (i.e., trips that travel within the City, or that have one end inside the City and one end outside the City). Pass-through or non-local trips are excluded from the SRTIF calculations.

The results of the local trip analysis and the SRTIF project costs are summarized in Table 25. The table lists each of the TIF projects and shows the percentage of the new local traffic on the facility (i.e., the traffic resulting from new growth in San Ramon) that meets the definition of local trips, as described above. The percentage of new local traffic on each facility is then used as the percentage of that facility’s improvement cost that will be considered eligible for inclusion in the SRTIF program.

It should be noted that some projects on the SRTIF list are not specific to an individual location but are more citywide in nature. This includes Projects 11, 16, 17, 18, 21 and 23. These types of projects cannot be reflected in the CCTA model, so the modeling procedure described above is not applicable to those projects.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
27 Instead, because of the citywide nature of these projects, the proportion of project cost considered eligible for inclusion in the SRTIF program was determined based on the roadway congestion in the future year that is attributable to the projected growth within the City of San Ramon. The roadway congestion due to projected growth was determined based on the increase in congested lane miles between the base year and future year model runs for the trips that start and/or end in the City (internal trips). The ratio of Citywide growth-related congested lane miles to the total congested lane miles for the future year model run was used as the proportion of project cost eligible for inclusion in the SRTIF program for the citywide projects.

The proportion was calculated to be 30.5-percent as shown in Table 25 below.

The intent of this analysis is solely for the purposes of the SRTIF process. The primary result is the percentage of new trips projected to use each facility that are local. It is not intended for these results to be used to determine the appropriate size or configuration for any particular facility, or to directly support any projectspecific planning activities.

Table 25: Project Costs Eligible for TIF
Number Project Total Cost Estimate
(2023 $) % of New Local Trips Cost Eligible forSRTIF
1 Camino Ramon Shopping Center
Intersection Improvements $568,700 23.7% $135,000
2 Bollinger Canyon Rd. / Crow Canyon
Rd. Intersection $763,500 96.8% $738,900
3 Fostoria Way Widening $3,685,500 88.6% $3,265,600
4 Bollinger Canyon Rd. / Norris
Canyon Rd. Traffic Signal $578,400 75.1% $434,400
5 Crow Canyon Rd. / Service Center
Traffic Signal $557,100 100.0% $557,100
6 San Ramon Valley Blvd. / Westside
Dr. Traffic Signal $476,000 64.2% $305,500
7 San Ramon Valley Blvd. Curb
Installation $340,000 40.2% $136,800
8 San Ramon Valley Blvd. / Hooper
Dr. Traffic Signal $608,700 51.0% $310,300
9 Camino Ramon Office Park
Intersection Improvements $625,500 23.7% $148,500
10 Crow Canyon Rd. / Shoreline Dr.

Intersection $250,200 100.0% $250,200
11 Pedestrian Enhancements $0 30.5% $0
12 Montevideo Dr. / Broadmoor Dr.

Traffic Signal $518,100 23.2% $120,300
13 Pine Valley Road / Broadmoor Drive
Traffic Signal $658,200 7.4% $48,800

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
28 14 Old Crow Canyon Rd. Corridor
Improvement $6,739,200 100.0% $6,739,200
15 Crow Canyon Rd. / Iron Horse Trail
Bicycle Pedestrian Overcrossing $20,700,000 30.5% $6,317,600 16 Citywide Bicycle Network
Improvements & Enhancements $50,443,500 30.5% $15,395,400 17 Radar Speed Display Sign $52,650 30.5% $16,100
18 Citywide Intelligent Transportation
System Upgrade $41,852,900 30.5% $12,773,500
19 Bike Master Plan Update $176,000 100.0% $176,000
20 ITS Master Plan Update $110,000 100.0% $110,000
21 Local Roadway Safety Plan Projects $2,086,900 30.5% $636,900 22 Future Nexus Study Update $80,000 100.0% $80,000
23 Smart Signals Project $248,175 100%* $248,200
24 Bollinger Canyon Rd. Sidewalk
Improvement $891,955 18.6% $165,600
Total $133,011,180 36.9% $49,109,900
Sources: City of San Ramon CIP, 2023; Contra Costa County, Contra Costa Transportation Authority, CCTA Model; Fehr & Peers, 2021.

Additional Kimley-Horn model analysis, 2023.
* Total cost for Smart Signals project for the signals within the City is 2,163,683. The proportion of Citywide project eligible for inclusion in SRTIF program is 30.5% which is higher than the required 11.47% local match for the available funding for this project.

Therefore, 100% of the project cost is considered eligible for in SRTIF program.

Fee Calculations
The SRTIF fee is calculated based on the total costs eligible for inclusion in the TIF program divided by the projected amount of new Adjusted PM Peak Trips anticipated to occur between 2023 and 2040. Table 26 summarizes the result of the calculations described previously, resulting in a fee calculation of $4,634 per PM Peak-hour trip. Table 27 applies this value across all land use categories. As mentioned earlier, a stratified fee structure based on square footage for single family residential units was established as part of the AB 602 compliant Nexus Fee Study.

Table 26: Calculation of Fee per Adjusted PM Peak Trip
Calculation Value
Cost Eligible for TIF $49,109,900
Growth in Adjusted PM Peak Trips 10,599
Fee per Trip $4,634
Source: Fehr & Peers, Nexus Study 2021 and Kimley-Horn, Nexus Study 2023.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
29 Table 27: Fee per Land Use Category
Land Use Category Unit Fee per
Trip
Adjusted PM Peak
Trip Demand Factor
Raw Fee
per Unit
Administrative
Charge (2%)
Total Fee
per Unit
Residential
Single Family < 1,000 SF DU $3,846 0.88 $3,370 $67 $3,438 Single Family 1,000-1,499 SF DU $4,170 0.88 $3,655 $73 $3,728 Single Family 1,500-1,999 SF DU $4,355 0.88 $3,817 $76 $3,893 Single Family 2,000-2,499 SF DU $4,494 0.88 $3,939 $79 $4,018 Single Family 2,500-2,999 SF DU $4,634 0.88 $4,061 $81 $4,142 Single Family 3,000-3,999 SF DU $4,773 0.88 $4,183 $84 $4,266 Single Family >4,000 SF DU $4,819 0.88 $4,223 $84 $4,308 Multi-family DU $4,634 0.48 $2,203 $44 $2,247
Other PM Peak
Hour Trip $4,634 1.00 $4,634 $93 $4,726
Nonresidential
Retail KSF $4,634 1.72 $7,973 $159 $8,132
Office KSF $4,634 2.16 $10,005 $200 $10,205
Service Commercial1 KSF $4,634 - $4,652 $93 $4,745
Other PM Peak
Hour Trip $4,634 1.00 $4,634 $93 $4,726
1The Service Commercial Raw Fee per Unit was calculated to maintain the same relationship between the Office fee and the Service Commercial fee that is contained in the City’s current fee schedule.

Source: Fehr & Peers, Nexus Study 2021 and Kimley-Horn, Nexus Study 2023. Fee per Single Family DUs developed based AB 602 Housing Analysis.

It should be emphasized that the values presented in this nexus report are the maximum fee levels that could be set based on the data and assumptions presented here. The City Council may elect to set fee amounts that are lower than the maximum levels.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
30 6. Summary of Required Program
Elements
This report has provided a detailed discussion of the elements of the San Ramon Transportation Impact Fee program and explained the analytical techniques used to develop this nexus study. The report addresses the fee program elements required by Government Code 66000-66025, as summarized below.

1. Identifying the purpose of the fee
The San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee (SRTIF) program is established for the purpose of supporting public infrastructure improvements and facilities needed to mitigate the traffic-related impacts of new development in San Ramon.

2. Identifying how the fee will be used and the facilities to be funded through the fee The fee is used to help fund capital improvement projects that will accommodate future transportation needs throughout the City of San Ramon. Table 2 identifies the projects to be funded through the fee.

3. Determining a reasonable relationship between the fee’s use and the type of development on which the fee is imposed
As described in this report, different types of development generate traffic with different characteristics.

The calculations presented in Table 5 account for these characteristics by calculating the travel-related characteristics of different land use types. These considerations account for the difference in impacts on the local transportation system generated by different land use types.

4. Determining a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development on which the fee is imposed
The need for the facilities listed in Table 2 has been established through local planning processes prepared by the City of San Ramon and building upon the adopted nexus study from the 2016 TIF Update.

5. Determining a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility (or portion of facility) attributable to new development Section 4 of this report describes the calculations completed to determine the cost of the public facility that is attributable to new development in the SRTIF area. A reasonable effort has been made to quantitatively establish the relationship between the fees charged in the SRTIF program and the costs of public improvements attributable to new development within the City of San Ramon.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
31 Appendices
Appendix A: Traffic Impact Fees in San Ramon and Nearby Jurisdictions
As part of the process to update the City of San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee (SRTIF) program, staff requested a summary of transportation impact fees collected by other jurisdictions in the general vicinity of the City.

The following table presents the data collected and compares it to the existing and proposed SRTIF amounts. Information on fees in other jurisdictions was gathered from the current fee schedules available on each jurisdiction’s website. Jurisdictions impose development impact fees for a wide range of purposes; the fees shown here are those charged specifically for transportation purposes. As shown in the table below, the current and proposed SRTIF fees are lower than the average of nearby jurisdictions for all land uses except Office.

Municipality / Authority Single-Family
(Per Unit)
Multifamily
(Per Unit)
Retail (Per
KSF)
Office (Per
KSF)
San Ramon (Current) $2,918 $1,809 $6,090 $7,070
San Ramon (Proposed) $4,142* $2,247 $8,132 $10,205
Average of Nearby Jurisdictions $9,510 $6,255 $12,462 $12,134 Brentwood $14,567 $9,031 $5,428 $6,511
Concord $3,251 $2,624 $8,810 $7,040
Dublin (West Dublin) $7,681 $3,994 $7,681 $7,681
Oakley $14,587 $8,898 $2,567 $8,893
Livermore (Downtown) N/A $4,913 $14,595 N/A
Livermore (All other areas) $11,869 $8,002 $32,235 $20,636 Martinez $2,221 $1,528 $2,230 $1,810
Pleasant Hill $3,879 $3,110 $10,030 $8,527
Pleasanton $11,392 $7,005 $26,130 $17,780
Alamo (Unincorporated Contra Costa
County) $16,142 $13,446 $14,910 $14,910
Regional Fees
Contra Costa Sub-Regional Fees $5,178 $5,178 $5,000 $7,970 Southern Contra Costa Regional Fees $1,853 $1,853 $1,810 $2,910 Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fees $6,946 $4,095 $5,920 $9,280 Note: N/A - Not Applicable or Not Available, KSF = 1,000 Square Feet. * Fee reported for the middle group of dwelling unit sizes.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
October 2023
32 Appendix B: Level of Service Analysis Outputs

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Intersection LOS Outputs: Existing Conditions

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th TWSC Scenario Existing
1: Camino Ramon & Shopping Plaza 03/07/2023
Scenario Existing San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Existing (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 9.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 56 0 97 7 2 43 159 542 2 13 529 45
Future Vol, veh/h 56 0 97 7 2 43 159 542 2 13 529 45
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 238 - - 75 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 62 0 108 8 2 48 177 602 2 14 588 50
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1297 1599 319 1279 1623 302 638 0 0 604 0 0 Stage 1 641 641 - 957 957 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 656 958 - 322 666 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 119 105 677 123 102 694 942 - - 970 - - Stage 1 430 468 - 277 334 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 421 334 - 664 456 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 92 84 677 88 82 694 942 - - 970 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 92 84 - 88 82 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 349 461 - 225 271 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 316 271 - 550 450 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 75.7 19.1 2.2 0.2

HCM LOS F C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 942 - - 203 313 970 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.188 - - 0.837 0.185 0.015 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.7 - - 75.7 19.1 8.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F C A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - - 6.2 0.7 0 - -

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario Existing 2: Bollinger Canyon Rd & Crow Canyon Rd 03/07/2023
Scenario Existing San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Existing (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 678 58 79 966 25 59 39 63 24 26 18 Future Volume (veh/h) 23 678 58 79 966 25 59 39 63 24 26 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 27 798 68 93 1136 29 69 46 74 28 31 21 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 49 1833 818 161 2057 917 89 258 219 40 115 78 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.52 0.52 0.09 0.58 0.58 0.05 0.14 0.14 0.02 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1039 704 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 27 798 68 93 1136 29 69 46 74 28 0 52 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1744 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 12.6 2.0 4.5 17.8 0.7 3.4 2.0 3.8 1.4 0.0 2.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.3 12.6 2.0 4.5 17.8 0.7 3.4 2.0 3.8 1.4 0.0 2.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 49 1833 818 161 2057 917 89 258 219 40 0 192 V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.44 0.08 0.58 0.55 0.03 0.77 0.18 0.34 0.70 0.00 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 178 1833 818 178 2057 917 218 520 440 218 0 484 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.2 13.6 11.0 39.3 11.7 8.1 42.2 34.3 35.1 43.7 0.0 36.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.6 0.8 0.2 3.8 1.1 0.1 13.0 0.3 0.9 20.0 0.0 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 4.6 0.7 2.1 6.1 0.2 1.8 0.9 1.5 0.8 0.0 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 52.8 14.4 11.2 43.1 12.8 8.2 55.3 34.6 36.0 63.7 0.0 37.5 LnGrp LOS D B B D B A E C D E A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 893 1258 189 80
Approach Delay, s/veh 15.3 14.9 42.7 46.7
Approach LOS B B D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.1 53.4 6.0 17.4 7.5 59.1 8.5 14.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 7.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 4.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 24.0 11.0 25.0 9.0 24.0 11.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.5 14.6 3.4 5.8 3.3 19.8 5.4 4.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.4 0.0 2.6 0.1 0.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.3
HCM 6th LOS B

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th AWSC Scenario Existing
4: Bollinger Canyon Rd & Norris Canyon Rd 03/07/2023
Scenario Existing San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Existing (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 3
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh16.3
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 105 295 67 92 35 113 138 55 33 203 9 Future Vol, veh/h 9 105 295 67 92 35 113 138 55 33 203 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 10 117 328 74 102 39 126 153 61 37 226 10
Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 2 3 3
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 1 2
HCM Control Delay 18.5 18.4 13.7 14.1

HCM LOS C C B B

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 NBLn3 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 0% 8% 0% 35% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 46% 92% 0% 47% 0% 100% 88%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 54% 0% 100% 18% 0% 0% 12%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 113 92 101 114 295 194 33 135 77
LT Vol 113 0 0 9 0 67 33 0 0
Through Vol 0 92 46 105 0 92 0 135 68
RT Vol 0 0 55 0 295 35 0 0 9
Lane Flow Rate 126 102 112 127 328 216 37 150 85
Geometry Grp 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Degree of Util (X) 0.297 0.227 0.237 0.268 0.626 0.485 0.089 0.342 0.191 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.518 8 7.606 7.629 6.88 8.1 8.696 8.178 8.092 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 421 447 470 469 521 444 410 438 441
Service Time 6.303 5.785 5.391 5.404 4.654 5.885 6.483 5.965 5.879 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.299 0.228 0.238 0.271 0.63 0.486 0.09 0.342 0.193 HCM Control Delay 14.9 13.1 12.8 13.2 20.6 18.4 12.3 15.2 12.8 HCM Lane LOS B B B B C C B C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.2 0.9 0.9 1.1 4.3 2.6 0.3 1.5 0.7

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th TWSC Scenario Existing
5: Service Center & Crow Canyon Rd. 03/07/2023
Scenario Existing San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Existing (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 836 9 12 604 1 6 0 13 4 0 4
Future Vol, veh/h 4 836 9 12 604 1 6 0 13 4 0 4
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 211 - - 193 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 4 889 10 13 643 1 6 0 14 4 0 4
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 644 0 0 899 0 0 1250 1572 450 1123 1577 322 Stage 1 - - - - - - 902 902 - 670 670 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 348 670 - 453 907 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 937 - - 751 - - 129 109 556 160 109 674 Stage 1 - - - - - - 299 355 - 413 454 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 641 454 - 556 353 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 937 - - 751 - - 126 107 556 153 107 674 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 126 107 - 153 107 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 298 354 - 411 446 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 626 446 - 540 352 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 19.5 20

HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 268 937 - - 751 - - 249
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.075 0.005 - - 0.017 - - 0.034
HCM Control Delay (s) 19.5 8.9 - - 9.9 - - 20
HCM Lane LOS C A - - A - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th TWSC Scenario Existing
6: San Ramon Valley & WestSide Dr 03/07/2023
Scenario Existing San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Existing (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 37 24 20 445 504 50
Future Vol, veh/h 37 24 20 445 504 50
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 125 130 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 41 26 22 489 554 55
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 871 305 609 0 - 0
Stage 1 582 - - - - -
Stage 2 289 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 290 691 966 - - -
Stage 1 522 - - - - -
Stage 2 735 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 283 691 966 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 283 - - - - -
Stage 1 510 - - - - -
Stage 2 735 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 16.1 0.4 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 966 - 283 691 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 - 0.144 0.038 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.8 - 19.8 10.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.5 0.1 - -

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th TWSC Scenario Existing
8: San Ramon Valley Blvd. & Hooper Dr. 03/07/2023
Scenario Existing San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Existing (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 0 46 5 2 4 31 652 0 0 422 29
Future Vol, veh/h 19 0 46 5 2 4 31 652 0 0 422 29
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 55 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 20 0 49 5 2 4 33 701 0 0 454 31
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 888 1237 243 994 1252 351 485 0 0 - - 0 Stage 1 470 470 - 767 767 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 418 767 - 227 485 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 238 175 758 199 171 645 1074 - - 0 - - Stage 1 543 558 - 361 410 - - - - 0 - -
Stage 2 583 410 - 755 550 - - - - 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 228 170 758 182 166 645 1074 - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 228 170 - 182 166 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 526 558 - 350 397 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 558 397 - 706 550 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 14.4 20.7 0.4 0

HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1074 - - 451 241 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.031 - - 0.155 0.049 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 - - 14.4 20.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0.5 0.2 - -

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th TWSC Scenario Existing
9: Camino Ramon & Office Park Dr 03/07/2023
Scenario Existing San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Existing (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 7.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 66 0 101 0 0 1 77 667 0 1 535 71
Future Vol, veh/h 66 0 101 0 0 1 77 667 0 1 535 71
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 102 - - 79 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 77 0 117 0 0 1 90 776 0 1 622 83
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1234 1622 353 1269 1663 388 705 0 0 776 0 0 Stage 1 666 666 - 956 956 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 568 956 - 313 707 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 133 102 643 125 96 611 889 - - 836 - - Stage 1 415 456 - 277 335 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 475 335 - 672 436 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 122 92 643 94 86 611 889 - - 836 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 122 92 - 94 86 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 373 456 - 249 301 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 426 301 - 549 436 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 63.2 10.9 1 0

HCM LOS F B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 889 - - 239 611 836 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.101 - - 0.812 0.002 0.001 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 9.5 - - 63.2 10.9 9.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - - F B A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 6.2 0 0 - -

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario Existing 10: Shoreline Dr. & Crow Canyon Rd. 03/07/2023
Scenario Existing San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Existing (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 8
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 817 127 23 598 74 36
Future Volume (veh/h) 817 127 23 598 74 36
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 860 134 24 629 78 38
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 2290 357 46 2911 144 128
Arrive On Green 0.74 0.74 0.03 0.82 0.08 0.08
Sat Flow, veh/h 3174 480 1781 3647 1781 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 496 498 24 629 78 38
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1784 1781 1777 1781 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 8.0 8.0 1.1 3.1 3.4 1.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.0 8.0 1.1 3.1 3.4 1.8
Prop In Lane 0.27 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1321 1326 46 2911 144 128
V/C Ratio(X) 0.38 0.38 0.52 0.22 0.54 0.30
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1321 1326 245 2911 679 604
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 3.7 3.7 38.5 1.6 35.3 34.6
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.8 8.8 0.2 3.1 1.3
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 1.8 0.6 0.2 1.6 0.7
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 4.5 4.5 47.3 1.8 38.5 35.9
LnGrp LOS A A D A D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 994 653 116
Approach Delay, s/veh 4.5 3.4 37.6
Approach LOS A A D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.1 63.5 69.5 10.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 27.0 31.0 30.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.1 10.0 5.1 5.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.5 4.0 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.3
HCM 6th LOS A

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th AWSC Scenario Existing
12: Broadmoor Dr. & Montevideo Dr. 03/07/2023
Scenario Existing San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Existing (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 9
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh11.1
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 38 162 39 103 147 31 69 7 83 24 10 26 Future Vol, veh/h 38 162 39 103 147 31 69 7 83 24 10 26 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 43 184 44 117 167 35 78 8 94 27 11 30
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 11.1 12 10.3 9.3

HCM LOS B B B A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 43% 16% 37% 40%
Vol Thru, % 4% 68% 52% 17%
Vol Right, % 52% 16% 11% 43%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 159 239 281 60
LT Vol 69 38 103 24
Through Vol 7 162 147 10
RT Vol 83 39 31 26
Lane Flow Rate 181 272 319 68
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.267 0.379 0.446 0.105
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.311 5.023 5.029 5.569
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 676 720 718 642
Service Time 3.347 3.033 3.039 3.613
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.268 0.378 0.444 0.106
HCM Control Delay 10.3 11.1 12 9.3
HCM Lane LOS B B B A
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.1 1.8 2.3 0.4

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th AWSC Scenario Existing
13: Broadmoor Dr. & Pine Valley Rd. 03/07/2023
Scenario Existing San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Existing (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 10
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh12.7
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 31 117 60 61 151 39 34 68 41 38 39 28 Future Vol, veh/h 31 117 60 61 151 39 34 68 41 38 39 28 Peak Hour Factor 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 43 163 83 85 210 54 47 94 57 53 54 39
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 12.5 14.2 11.6 10.9

HCM LOS B B B B

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 24% 15% 24% 36%
Vol Thru, % 48% 56% 60% 37%
Vol Right, % 29% 29% 16% 27%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 143 208 251 105
LT Vol 34 31 61 38
Through Vol 68 117 151 39
RT Vol 41 60 39 28
Lane Flow Rate 199 289 349 146
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.32 0.431 0.52 0.241
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.803 5.374 5.374 5.951
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 616 667 669 599
Service Time 3.869 3.434 3.432 4.023
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.323 0.433 0.522 0.244
HCM Control Delay 11.6 12.5 14.2 10.9
HCM Lane LOS B B B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.4 2.2 3 0.9

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Intersection LOS Outputs: Future Without Project Conditions

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th TWSC Scenario Future No Project
1: Camino Ramon & Shopping Plaza 03/06/2023
Scenario Future No Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 102.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 80 0 153 8 2 43 189 681 2 13 801 58
Future Vol, veh/h 80 0 153 8 2 43 189 681 2 13 801 58
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 238 - - 75 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 89 0 170 9 2 48 210 757 2 14 890 64
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1750 2129 477 1651 2160 380 954 0 0 759 0 0 Stage 1 950 950 - 1178 1178 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 800 1179 - 473 982 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 55 49 534 65 47 618 716 - - 848 - - Stage 1 280 337 - 203 263 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 345 262 - 541 325 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 37 34 534 34 33 618 716 - - 848 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 37 34 - 34 33 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 198 331 - 144 186 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 222 185 - 363 319 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s$ 875.1 45.8 2.6 0.1

HCM LOS F E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 716 - - 95 145 848 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.293 - - 2.725 0.406 0.017 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 12.1 - -$ 875.1 45.8 9.3 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - F E A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 - - 24.5 1.8 0.1 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario Future No Project 2: Bollinger Canyon Rd & Crow Canyon Rd 03/06/2023
Scenario Future No Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 47 678 58 82 1006 52 81 106 83 31 35 24 Future Volume (veh/h) 47 678 58 82 1006 52 81 106 83 31 35 24 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 55 798 68 96 1184 61 95 125 98 36 41 28 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 74 1763 787 162 1939 865 122 286 243 47 115 79 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.09 0.55 0.55 0.07 0.15 0.15 0.03 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1036 707 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 55 798 68 96 1184 61 95 125 98 36 0 69 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 0 1743 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 13.1 2.0 4.7 20.4 1.6 4.7 5.5 5.0 1.8 0.0 3.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.7 13.1 2.0 4.7 20.4 1.6 4.7 5.5 5.0 1.8 0.0 3.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.41
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 74 1763 787 162 1939 865 122 286 243 47 0 194 V/C Ratio(X) 0.74 0.45 0.09 0.59 0.61 0.07 0.78 0.44 0.40 0.77 0.00 0.36 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 178 1763 787 178 1939 865 218 520 440 218 0 484 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.7 14.7 11.9 39.3 13.9 9.7 41.3 34.6 34.4 43.5 0.0 37.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 13.7 0.8 0.2 4.4 1.4 0.2 10.2 1.0 1.1 22.4 0.0 1.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.4 4.8 0.7 2.1 7.3 0.6 2.4 2.5 2.0 1.1 0.0 1.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.3 15.6 12.1 43.7 15.4 9.8 51.5 35.6 35.5 65.9 0.0 38.1 LnGrp LOS E B B D B A D D D E A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 921 1341 318 105
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.8 17.1 40.3 47.7
Approach LOS B B D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.2 51.7 6.4 18.8 8.7 56.1 10.2 15.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 7.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 4.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 24.0 11.0 25.0 9.0 24.0 11.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.7 15.1 3.8 7.5 4.7 22.4 6.7 5.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.1 0.1 0.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.3
HCM 6th LOS C

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th AWSC Scenario Future No Project
4: Bollinger Canyon Rd & Norris Canyon Rd 03/06/2023
Scenario Future No Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 3
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh26.5
Intersection LOS D
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 112 324 92 113 47 158 211 84 34 217 9 Future Vol, veh/h 10 112 324 92 113 47 158 211 84 34 217 9 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 11 124 360 102 126 52 176 234 93 38 241 10
Number of Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 2 3 3
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 3 3 2 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 3 3 1 2
HCM Control Delay 33.9 35.2 19.1 18.1

HCM LOS D E C C

Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 NBLn3 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBLn1 SBLn2 SBLn3 Vol Left, % 100% 0% 0% 8% 0% 37% 100% 0% 0%
Vol Thru, % 0% 100% 46% 92% 0% 45% 0% 100% 89%
Vol Right, % 0% 0% 54% 0% 100% 19% 0% 0% 11%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 158 141 154 122 324 252 34 145 81
LT Vol 158 0 0 10 0 92 34 0 0
Through Vol 0 141 70 112 0 113 0 145 72
RT Vol 0 0 84 0 324 47 0 0 9
Lane Flow Rate 176 156 171 136 360 280 38 161 90
Geometry Grp 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Degree of Util (X) 0.477 0.402 0.422 0.34 0.828 0.742 0.109 0.442 0.246 Departure Headway (Hd) 9.785 9.26 8.86 9.167 8.406 9.537 10.416 9.889 9.807 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 370 391 408 394 432 381 345 365 367
Service Time 7.501 6.976 6.576 6.867 6.106 7.254 8.151 7.623 7.542 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.476 0.399 0.419 0.345 0.833 0.735 0.11 0.441 0.245 HCM Control Delay 21.1 18.1 17.9 16.5 40.4 35.2 14.4 20.3 15.7 HCM Lane LOS C C C C E E B C C
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.5 1.9 2 1.5 7.8 5.8 0.4 2.2 1

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th TWSC Scenario Future No Project
5: Service Center & Crow Canyon Rd. 03/06/2023
Scenario Future No Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 4
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 1176 10 12 657 1 6 0 13 5 0 4
Future Vol, veh/h 5 1176 10 12 657 1 6 0 13 5 0 4
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 211 - - 193 - - - - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94 94
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 5 1251 11 13 699 1 6 0 14 5 0 4
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 700 0 0 1262 0 0 1643 1993 631 1362 1998 350 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1267 1267 - 726 726 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 376 726 - 636 1272 -
Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 893 - - 547 - - 66 60 424 107 59 646 Stage 1 - - - - - - 179 238 - 382 428 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 617 428 - 433 237 -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 893 - - 547 - - 64 58 424 101 57 646 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 64 58 - 101 57 -
Stage 1 - - - - - - 178 237 - 380 418 -
Stage 2 - - - - - - 598 418 - 417 236 -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 32.1 28.6

HCM LOS D D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 153 893 - - 547 - - 162
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.132 0.006 - - 0.023 - - 0.059
HCM Control Delay (s) 32.1 9.1 - - 11.7 - - 28.6
HCM Lane LOS D A - - B - - D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.2

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th TWSC Scenario Future No Project
6: San Ramon Valley & WestSide Dr 03/06/2023
Scenario Future No Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 5
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 9.3
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 47 31 20 1029 1429 59
Future Vol, veh/h 47 31 20 1029 1429 59
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 125 130 - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 52 34 22 1131 1570 65
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 2213 818 1635 0 - 0
Stage 1 1603 - - - - -
Stage 2 610 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 4.14 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 2.22 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 37 319 393 - - -
Stage 1 150 - - - - -
Stage 2 505 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 35 319 393 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 35 - - - - -
Stage 1 142 - - - - -
Stage 2 505 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s$ 306.7 0.3 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 393 - 35 319 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.056 - 1.476 0.107 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 14.7 -$ 497.3 17.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 5.6 0.4 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th TWSC Scenario Future No Project
8: San Ramon Valley Blvd. & Hooper Dr. 03/06/2023
Scenario Future No Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 6
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 46 0 102 5 0 4 69 719 0 0 719 108
Future Vol, veh/h 46 0 102 5 0 4 69 719 0 0 719 108
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 55 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 49 0 110 5 0 4 74 773 0 0 773 116
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1366 1752 445 1308 1810 387 889 0 0 - - 0 Stage 1 831 831 - 921 921 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 535 921 - 387 889 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 106 85 561 117 78 611 758 - - 0 - -
Stage 1 330 383 - 291 347 - - - - 0 - -
Stage 2 497 347 - 608 360 - - - - 0 - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 97 77 561 87 70 611 758 - - - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 97 77 - 87 70 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 298 383 - 262 313 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 445 313 - 489 360 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 51.7 32.4 0.9 0

HCM LOS F D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 758 - - 226 141 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.098 - - 0.704 0.069 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 10.3 - - 51.7 32.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - F D - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 4.6 0.2 - -

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th TWSC Scenario Future No Project
9: Camino Ramon & Office Park Dr 03/06/2023
Scenario Future No Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 36.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 66 0 104 0 0 1 77 841 0 1 860 77
Future Vol, veh/h 66 0 104 0 0 1 77 841 0 1 860 77
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - - - - - 102 - - 79 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 77 0 121 0 0 1 90 978 0 1 1000 90
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1716 2205 545 1660 2250 489 1090 0 0 978 0 0 Stage 1 1047 1047 - 1158 1158 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 669 1158 - 502 1092 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 58 44 482 64 41 525 636 - - 701 - - Stage 1 244 303 - 208 269 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 413 269 - 520 289 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 52 38 482 43 35 525 636 - - 701 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 52 38 - 43 35 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 209 303 - 178 231 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 354 231 - 389 289 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s$ 429.6 11.9 1 0

HCM LOS F B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 636 - - 114 525 701 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.141 - - 1.734 0.002 0.002 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 11.6 - -$ 429.6 11.9 10.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - F B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - 15.3 0 0 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario Future No Project 10: Shoreline Dr. & Crow Canyon Rd. 03/06/2023
Scenario Future No Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 8
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1154 210 32 628 74 39
Future Volume (veh/h) 1154 210 32 628 74 39
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1215 221 34 661 78 41
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 2211 399 59 2909 145 129
Arrive On Green 0.74 0.74 0.03 0.82 0.08 0.08
Sat Flow, veh/h 3100 543 1781 3647 1781 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 715 721 34 661 78 41
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1773 1781 1777 1781 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 14.2 14.5 1.5 3.3 3.4 2.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.2 14.5 1.5 3.3 3.4 2.0
Prop In Lane 0.31 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 1307 1304 59 2909 145 129
V/C Ratio(X) 0.55 0.55 0.58 0.23 0.54 0.32
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1307 1304 245 2909 679 604
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.7 4.7 38.1 1.6 35.3 34.7
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.6 1.7 8.6 0.2 3.1 1.4
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.4 3.4 0.8 0.3 1.6 0.8
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 6.3 6.4 46.7 1.8 38.4 36.1
LnGrp LOS A A D A D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1436 695 119
Approach Delay, s/veh 6.4 4.0 37.6
Approach LOS A A D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.7 62.8 69.5 10.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 27.0 42.0 30.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 16.5 5.3 5.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.3 4.5 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 7.3
HCM 6th LOS A

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th AWSC Scenario Future No Project
12: Broadmoor Dr. & Montevideo Dr. 03/06/2023
Scenario Future No Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 9
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh13.2
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 38 180 39 122 194 36 77 7 104 26 10 26 Future Vol, veh/h 38 180 39 122 194 36 77 7 104 26 10 26 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 43 205 44 139 220 41 88 8 118 30 11 30
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 12.3 15.3 11.5 9.9

HCM LOS B C B A

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 41% 15% 35% 42%
Vol Thru, % 4% 70% 55% 16%
Vol Right, % 55% 15% 10% 42%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 188 257 352 62
LT Vol 77 38 122 26
Through Vol 7 180 194 10
RT Vol 104 39 36 26
Lane Flow Rate 214 292 400 70
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.333 0.43 0.58 0.118
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.613 5.301 5.216 6.008
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 639 678 692 594
Service Time 3.666 3.348 3.258 4.074
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.335 0.431 0.578 0.118
HCM Control Delay 11.5 12.3 15.3 9.9
HCM Lane LOS B B C A
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.5 2.2 3.8 0.4

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th AWSC Scenario Future No Project
13: Broadmoor Dr. & Pine Valley Rd. 03/06/2023
Scenario Future No Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 10
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh15.5
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 31 117 60 67 179 45 42 82 46 44 46 35 Future Vol, veh/h 31 117 60 67 179 45 42 82 46 44 46 35 Peak Hour Factor 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 43 163 83 93 249 63 58 114 64 61 64 49
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach RightNB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 14.2 19 13.6 12.4

HCM LOS B C B B

Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 25% 15% 23% 35%
Vol Thru, % 48% 56% 62% 37%
Vol Right, % 27% 29% 15% 28%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 170 208 291 125
LT Vol 42 31 67 44
Through Vol 82 117 179 46
RT Vol 46 60 45 35
Lane Flow Rate 236 289 404 174
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X) 0.41 0.473 0.652 0.31
Departure Headway (Hd) 6.258 5.891 5.811 6.432
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 574 610 626 557
Service Time 4.313 3.939 3.811 4.491
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.411 0.474 0.645 0.312
HCM Control Delay 13.6 14.2 19 12.4
HCM Lane LOS B B C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 2 2.5 4.8 1.3

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Intersection LOS Outputs: Future With Project Conditions

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th TWSC Scenario Future with Project
1: Camino Ramon & Shopping Plaza 03/06/2023
Scenario Future with Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 37.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 80 0 153 8 2 43 189 681 2 13 801 58
Future Vol, veh/h 80 0 153 8 2 43 189 681 2 13 801 58
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 0 - - - 238 - - 75 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 89 0 170 9 2 48 210 757 2 14 890 64
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1750 2129 477 1651 2160 380 954 0 0 759 0 0 Stage 1 950 950 - 1178 1178 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 800 1179 - 473 982 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 55 49 534 65 47 618 716 - - 848 - - Stage 1 280 337 - 203 263 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 345 262 - 541 325 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 37 34 534 34 33 618 716 - - 848 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 37 34 - 34 33 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 198 331 - 144 186 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 222 185 - 363 319 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s$ 308.6 45.8 2.6 0.1

HCM LOS F E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 716 - - 37 534 145 848 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.293 - - 2.402 0.318 0.406 0.017 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 12.1 - -$ 870.3 14.9 45.8 9.3 - - HCM Lane LOS B - - F B E A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 - - 9.9 1.4 1.8 0.1 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario Future with Project 2: Bollinger Canyon Rd & Crow Canyon Rd 03/06/2023
Scenario Future with Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 47 678 58 82 1006 52 81 106 83 31 35 24 Future Volume (veh/h) 47 678 58 82 1006 52 81 106 83 31 35 24 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 55 798 68 96 1184 61 95 125 98 36 41 28 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 74 1763 787 162 1939 865 122 286 243 47 208 176 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.09 0.55 0.55 0.07 0.15 0.15 0.03 0.11 0.11 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 55 798 68 96 1184 61 95 125 98 36 41 28 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 13.1 2.0 4.7 20.4 1.6 4.7 5.5 5.0 1.8 1.8 1.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.7 13.1 2.0 4.7 20.4 1.6 4.7 5.5 5.0 1.8 1.8 1.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 74 1763 787 162 1939 865 122 286 243 47 208 176 V/C Ratio(X) 0.74 0.45 0.09 0.59 0.61 0.07 0.78 0.44 0.40 0.77 0.20 0.16 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 178 1763 787 178 1939 865 218 520 440 218 520 440 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 42.7 14.7 11.9 39.3 13.9 9.7 41.3 34.6 34.4 43.5 36.4 36.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 13.7 0.8 0.2 4.4 1.4 0.2 10.2 1.0 1.1 22.4 0.5 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.4 4.8 0.7 2.1 7.3 0.6 2.4 2.5 2.0 1.1 0.8 0.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 56.3 15.6 12.1 43.7 15.4 9.8 51.5 35.6 35.5 65.9 36.8 36.6 LnGrp LOS E B B D B A D D D E D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 921 1341 318 105
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.8 17.1 40.3 46.7
Approach LOS B B D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.2 51.7 6.4 18.8 8.7 56.1 10.2 15.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 7.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 7.0 4.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 9.0 24.0 11.0 25.0 9.0 24.0 11.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.7 15.1 3.8 7.5 4.7 22.4 6.7 3.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.1 0.1 0.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.3
HCM 6th LOS C

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario Future with Project 4: Bollinger Canyon Rd & Norris Canyon Rd 03/06/2023
Scenario Future with Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 10 112 324 92 113 47 158 211 84 34 217 9 Future Volume (veh/h) 10 112 324 92 113 47 158 211 84 34 217 9 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 11 124 0 102 126 52 176 234 93 38 241 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 132 459 264 221 77 231 695 268 79 564 23
Arrive On Green 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.13 0.28 0.28 0.04 0.16 0.16 Sat Flow, veh/h 57 1782 1585 452 858 299 1781 2506 967 1781 3478 144 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 135 0 0 280 0 0 176 164 163 38 123 128 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1839 0 1585 1609 0 0 1781 1777 1696 1781 1777 1844 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.2 2.4 2.6 0.7 2.1 2.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 2.4 2.6 0.7 2.1 2.1 Prop In Lane 0.08 1.00 0.36 0.19 1.00 0.57 1.00 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 590 0 562 0 0 231 493 470 79 288 299 V/C Ratio(X) 0.23 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.33 0.35 0.48 0.43 0.43 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1529 0 1374 0 0 536 1282 1224 589 1282 1331 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 9.9 0.0 0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 14.0 9.6 9.6 15.5 12.5 12.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 5.2 0.4 0.4 4.4 1.0 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.6 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.7 0.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 10.1 0.0 0.0 11.7 0.0 0.0 19.1 10.0 10.0 19.9 13.5 13.5 LnGrp LOS B A B A A B A B B B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 135 280 503 289
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.1 11.7 13.2 14.4
Approach LOS B B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s5.5 14.2 13.6 9.3 10.4 13.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 * 5 5.0 5.0 * 5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 * 24 26.0 10.0 * 24 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.7 4.6 3.9 5.2 4.1 7.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.8 0.7 0.2 1.3 1.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.8
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

Unsignalized Delay for [EBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario Future with Project 5: Service Center & Crow Canyon Rd. 03/06/2023
Scenario Future with Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 5 1176 10 12 657 1 6 0 13 5 0 4
Future Volume (veh/h) 5 1176 10 12 657 1 6 0 13 5 0 4
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 5 1251 11 13 699 1 6 0 14 5 0 4
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 12 2547 22 29 2544 4 97 2 49 128 4 31
Arrive On Green 0.01 0.71 0.71 0.02 0.70 0.70 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.04 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3610 32 1781 3641 5 430 36 1085 781 86 694 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 5 616 646 13 341 359 20 0 0 9 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1777 1865 1781 1777 1869 1551 0 0 1561 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 9.4 9.4 0.4 4.3 4.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 9.4 9.4 0.4 4.3 4.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.00 0.30 0.70 0.56 0.44
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 12 1254 1316 29 1241 1306 147 0 0 163 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.42 0.49 0.49 0.45 0.27 0.27 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 148 1254 1316 178 1241 1306 538 0 0 540 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.7 4.0 4.0 29.2 3.4 3.4 27.7 0.0 0.0 27.5 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 22.0 1.4 1.3 10.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.1 1.7 1.8 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 51.7 5.4 5.3 39.8 3.9 3.9 28.1 0.0 0.0 27.7 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A A D A A C A A C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1267 713 20 9
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.5 4.6 28.1 27.7
Approach LOS A A C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s5.0 47.3 7.7 5.4 46.9 7.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 * 5 5.0 5.0 * 5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 * 22 18.0 5.0 * 22 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.4 11.4 2.3 2.2 6.3 2.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 5.5
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario Future with Project 6: San Ramon Valley & WestSide Dr 03/06/2023
Scenario Future with Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 47 31 20 1029 1429 59
Future Volume (veh/h) 47 31 20 1029 1429 59
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 52 34 22 1131 1570 65
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 141 125 49 2321 1711 71
Arrive On Green 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.65 0.49 0.49
Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1585 1781 3647 3571 144
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 52 34 22 1131 800 835
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1781 1585 1781 1777 1777 1845
Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 0.8 0.5 6.0 15.5 15.7
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 0.8 0.5 6.0 15.5 15.7
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 141 125 49 2321 874 908
V/C Ratio(X) 0.37 0.27 0.45 0.49 0.91 0.92
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 859 764 238 2712 880 914
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.3 16.2 17.9 3.3 8.8 8.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.6 1.2 6.4 0.2 13.9 14.2
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.4 0.0 0.2 0.1 5.8 6.2
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 17.9 17.3 24.3 3.5 22.6 23.0
LnGrp LOS B B C A C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 86 1153 1635
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.7 3.9 22.8
Approach LOS B A C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 29.4 8.0 6.0 23.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.5 18.0 5.0 18.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.0 3.0 2.5 17.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 7.6 0.2 0.0 0.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.1
HCM 6th LOS B

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario Future with Project 8: San Ramon Valley Blvd. 03/06/2023
Scenario Future with Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 46 0 102 5 0 4 69 719 0 0 719 108 Future Volume (veh/h) 46 0 102 5 0 4 69 719 0 0 719 108 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 0 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 50 0 111 5 0 4 75 782 0 0 782 117
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2
Cap, veh/h 223 21 191 300 46 126 436 1730 0 0 1509 226
Arrive On Green 0.18 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.18 0.49 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.49 Sat Flow, veh/h 364 120 1075 630 257 710 619 3647 0 0 3194 464 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 161 0 0 9 0 0 75 782 0 0 448 451
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1559 0 0 1597 0 0 619 1777 0 0 1777 1787 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.8 4.3 0.0 0.0 5.2 5.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 8.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 5.2 5.2 Prop In Lane 0.31 0.69 0.56 0.44 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.26
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 435 0 0 471 0 0 436 1730 0 0 865 870 V/C Ratio(X) 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.52 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1112 0 0 1093 0 0 582 2565 0 0 1283 1290 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 11.2 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.0 8.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 5.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 11.7 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 0.0 8.2 5.2 0.0 0.0 5.7 5.7 LnGrp LOS B A A B A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 161 9 857 899
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.7 10.1 5.5 5.7
Approach LOS B B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.5 10.3 19.5 10.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s * 5 5.0 * 5 5.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s * 22 18.5 * 22 18.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.0 4.8 7.2 2.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.5 0.7 4.9 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.1
HCM 6th LOS A
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th TWSC Scenario Future with Project
9: Camino Ramon & Office Park Dr 03/06/2023
Scenario Future with Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 7
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 14.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 66 0 104 0 0 1 77 841 0 1 860 77
Future Vol, veh/h 66 0 104 0 0 1 77 841 0 1 860 77
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - 0 - - - 102 - - 79 - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 77 0 121 0 0 1 90 978 0 1 1000 90
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1716 2205 545 1660 2250 489 1090 0 0 978 0 0 Stage 1 1047 1047 - 1158 1158 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 669 1158 - 502 1092 - - - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 4.14 - - 4.14 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 2.22 - - 2.22 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 58 44 482 64 41 525 636 - - 701 - - Stage 1 244 303 - 208 269 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 413 269 - 520 289 - - - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 52 38 482 43 35 525 636 - - 701 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 52 38 - 43 35 - - - - - - -
Stage 1 209 303 - 178 231 - - - - - - -
Stage 2 354 231 - 389 289 - - - - - - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 172.6 11.9 1 0

HCM LOS F B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 636 - - 52 482 525 701 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.141 - - 1.476 0.251 0.002 0.002 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 11.6 - - $ 421 15 11.9 10.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - - F C B B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - 7.1 1 0 0 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario Future with Project 10: Shoreline Dr. & Crow Canyon Rd. 03/06/2023
Scenario Future with Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 8
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 1154 210 32 628 74 39
Future Volume (veh/h) 1154 210 32 628 74 39
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 1215 221 34 661 78 41
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 2614 1166 59 2909 145 129
Arrive On Green 0.74 0.74 0.03 0.82 0.08 0.08
Sat Flow, veh/h 3647 1585 1781 3647 1781 1585
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 1215 221 34 661 78 41
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1777 1585 1781 1777 1781 1585
Q Serve(g_s), s 11.0 3.4 1.5 3.3 3.4 2.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.0 3.4 1.5 3.3 3.4 2.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 2614 1166 59 2909 145 129
V/C Ratio(X) 0.46 0.19 0.58 0.23 0.54 0.32
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 2614 1166 245 2909 679 604
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.2 3.2 38.1 1.6 35.3 34.7
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.4 8.6 0.2 3.1 1.4
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.4 0.7 0.8 0.3 1.6 0.8
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 4.8 3.6 46.7 1.8 38.4 36.1
LnGrp LOS A A D A D D
Approach Vol, veh/h 1436 695 119
Approach Delay, s/veh 4.7 4.0 37.6
Approach LOS A A D
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.7 62.8 69.5 10.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.0 27.0 42.0 30.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.5 13.0 5.3 5.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 7.4 4.5 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.2
HCM 6th LOS A

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario Future with Project 12: Broadmoor Dr. & Montevideo Dr. 03/06/2023
Scenario Future with Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 38 180 39 122 194 36 77 7 104 26 10 26 Future Volume (veh/h) 38 180 39 122 194 36 77 7 104 26 10 26 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 43 205 44 139 220 41 88 8 118 30 11 30 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 233 520 101 373 397 64 338 35 183 323 108 151 Arrive On Green 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 134 1344 262 413 1025 164 526 159 842 450 500 695 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 292 0 0 400 0 0 214 0 0 71 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1739 0 0 1603 0 0 1528 0 0 1645 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.7 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.15 0.15 0.35 0.10 0.41 0.55 0.42 0.42
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 855 0 0 834 0 0 555 0 0 582 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1857 0 0 1740 0 0 1448 0 0 1457 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.1 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 7.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.5 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 5.3 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 8.5 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 292 400 214 71
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.3 5.9 8.5 7.4
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.3 9.4 13.3 9.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.5 18.5 22.5 18.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.7 2.8 6.2 4.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.7 0.3 2.5 1.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.4
HCM 6th LOS A

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Scenario Future with Project 13: Broadmoor Dr. & Pine Valley Rd. 03/06/2023
Scenario Future with Project San Ramon Impact - PM 6:11 pm 08/02/2022 Future (PM) Synchro 11 Report KH Page 10
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 31 117 60 67 179 45 42 82 46 44 46 35 Future Volume (veh/h) 31 117 60 67 179 45 42 82 46 44 46 35 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 43 162 83 93 249 62 58 114 64 61 64 49 Peak Hour Factor 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cap, veh/h 226 408 185 285 438 97 261 220 108 306 183 111 Arrive On Green 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 Sat Flow, veh/h 132 1074 488 253 1154 255 294 926 454 419 771 467 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 288 0 0 404 0 0 236 0 0 174 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1695 0 0 1662 0 0 1674 0 0 1658 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.8 0.0 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.15 0.29 0.23 0.15 0.25 0.27 0.35 0.28
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 820 0 0 820 0 0 588 0 0 600 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1748 0 0 1738 0 0 1473 0 0 1427 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 5.4 0.0 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.0 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.5 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 5.7 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 7.8 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 288 404 236 174
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.7 6.3 8.3 7.8
Approach LOS A A A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.4 10.1 13.4 10.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.5 18.5 22.5 18.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.8 3.9 6.4 4.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.7 0.8 2.5 1.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 6.8
HCM 6th LOS A

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
November 2023
1 Roadway Capacity Analysis: LOS Outputs

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) PM Volume V/C LOS
EB 1 550 100 0.18 A
WB 1 550 125 0.23 A
PM Volume V/C LOS
EB 1 550 230 0.42 B
WB 1 550 420 0.76 D
PM Volume V/C LOS
EB 2 1600 230 0.14 A
EB 2 1600 420 0.26 A
# Lane Capcity
3 Fostoria Way e/o Camino Ramon
Project ID Name Location
2040 No Project
2040 With Project
2022 Existing
3 Fostoria Way e/o Camino Ramon
Project ID Name Location Direction # Lane Capcity
# Lane Capcity
3 Fostoria Way e/o Camino Ramon
Project ID Name Location

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Draft Report
San Ramon TIF Nexus Update
November 2023
1 Safety Analysis: LOS Outputs

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Project 21 1 1
Segment # Mile Avg Col/Yr/mi (5Yr) Existing
Model
Future NoBuildExisting
ADT
Future
ADT Link ID Exist NSPFx
Fut NP
NSPFx
Fut WP
NSPFx CRF Exist Fut NP Fut WP CMF Ex VMT Fut VMT Exist Fut NP Fut WP Crow Canyon Road 1 1.00 11.80 24,871 28,188 29,490 32,807 3598 6.6 7.4 7.4 31.0 11.8 13.1 9.1 0.69 10,763,850 11,974,555 1.1 1.1 0.8 2 0.55 61.9 43,013 49,666 43,265 49,918 3590 5.3 6.2 6.2 31.0 61.9 71.4 49.3 0.69 8,685,449 10,021,039 7.1 7.1 4.9 3 2.77 7.1 36,459 38,278 36,434 38,253 44937 22.6 23.8 23.8 31.0 7.1 7.5 5.1 0.69 36,836,596 38,675,696 0.2 0.2 0.1 Bollinger Canyon Road 4 0.64 47.5 39,223 45,548 32,216 38,541 43506 4.6 5.5 5.5 31.0 47.5 56.8 39.2 0.69 7,525,658 9,003,178 6.3 6.3 4.4 5 2.05 12.4 51,390 59,816 37,920 46,346 3562 17.4 21.3 21.3 31.0 12.4 15.2 10.5 0.69 28,373,640 34,678,395 0.4 0.4 0.3 6 2.22 13.8 29,955 38,739 29,956 38,740 34304 14.9 19.3 19.3 31.0 13.8 17.8 12.3 0.69 24,273,347 31,391,022 0.6 0.6 0.4 7 1.74 3.9 13,988 16,341 17,516 19,869 4104 6.8 7.8 7.8 31.0 3.9 4.4 3.1 0.69 11,124,412 12,618,802 0.4 0.4 0.2 San Ramon Valley Blvd 8 1.23 11.2 23,795 31,004 25,508 32,717 34298 7.0 9.0 9.0 31.0 11.2 14.4 9.9 0.69 11,451,817 14,688,297 1.0 1.0 0.7 9 1.83 5.4 13,402 23,164 15,140 24,902 29062 6.2 10.2 10.2 31.0 5.4 8.9 6.1 0.69 10,112,763 16,633,291 0.5 0.5 0.4 10 1.08 1.1 12,490 21,388 29,200 38,098 36752 7.1 9.2 9.2 31.0 1.1 1.4 1.0 0.69 11,510,640 15,018,232 0.1 0.1 0.1 Camino Ramon 11 1.54 4.9 14,904 23,478 13,741 22,315 42154 4.7 7.7 7.7 31.0 4.9 8.0 5.5 0.69 7,723,816 12,543,262 0.6 0.6 0.4 Montevideo Drive 12 1.29 4 5,021 5,720 11,784 12,483 3471 3.4 3.6 3.6 31.0 4.0 4.2 2.9 0.69 5,548,496 5,877,621 0.7 0.7 0.5 Alcosta Blvd 13 1.61 16.9 13,720 15,710 11,702 13,692 44924 4.2 4.9 4.9 31.0 16.9 19.8 13.6 0.69 6,876,680 8,046,104 2.5 2.5 1.7 14 3.77 3.2 18,552 19,532 14,593 15,573 3491 12.3 13.2 13.2 31.0 3.2 3.4 2.4 0.69 20,080,698 21,429,227 0.2 0.2 0.1 Broadmoor Drive 15 1.06 3.2 4,556 5,176 1,531 2,151 23528 0.4 0.5 0.5 31.0 3.2 4.5 3.1 0.69 592,344 832,222 5.4 5.4 3.7 Norris Canyon Road 16 0.97 2.3 9,512 13,624 12,280 16,392 3559 2.7 3.6 3.6 31.0 2.3 3.1 2.1 0.69 4,347,734 5,803,588 0.5 0.5 0.4 Pine Valley Road 17 1.23 1.8 7,877 8,622 9,507 10,252 36705 2.6 2.8 2.8 31.0 1.8 1.9 1.3 0.69 4,268,168 4,602,635 0.4 0.4 0.3 Project 7 & 14 1.87 1.82 1.26
Crow Canyon Road 7 1.90 51.00 12,800 14,700 5.5 6.3 6.3 11.0 51.0 58.6 52.1 0.89 44,384,000 50,972,250 1.1 1.1 1.0 Crow Canyon Road 14 0.40 4.00 2,320 3,000 0.2 0.3 0.3 11.0 4.0 5.2 4.6 0.89 1,693,600 2,190,000 2.4 2.4 2.1 Project 23
Bollinger Canyon Road 14 0.51 55.00 42,315 50,963 28,100 36,500 3744 3.2 4.2 4.2 31.0 55.0 71.4 49.3 0.69 26,154,075 33,972,375 2.1 2.1 1.5

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: A: Draft Final San Ramon Traffic Impact Fee Update (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Attachment B: Project Costs Eligible for TIF Program
Number Project Total Cost
Estimate (2023 $)
% of New
Local Trips
Cost Eligible
for SRTIF
1 Camino Ramon Shopping Center Intersection
Improvements $568,700 23.7% $135,000
2 Bollinger Canyon Rd. / Crow Canyon Rd.

Intersection $763,500 96.8% $738,900
3 Fostoria Way Widening $3,685,500 88.6% $3,265,600
4 Bollinger Canyon Rd. / Norris Canyon Rd. Traffic
Signal $578,400 75.1% $434,400
5 Crow Canyon Rd. / Service Center Traffic Signal $557,100 100.0% $557,100 6 San Ramon Valley Blvd. / Westside Dr. Traffic Signal $476,000 64.2% $305,500 7 San Ramon Valley Blvd. Curb Installation $340,000 40.2% $136,800 8 San Ramon Valley Blvd. / Hooper Dr. Traffic Signal $608,700 51.0% $310,300 9 Camino Ramon Office Park Intersection
Improvements $625,500 23.7% $148,500
10 Crow Canyon Rd. / Shoreline Dr. Intersection $250,200 100.0% $250,200 11 Pedestrian Enhancements $0 30.5% $0
12 Montevideo Dr. / Broadmoor Dr. Traffic Signal $518,100 23.2% $120,300 13 Pine Valley Road / Broadmoor Drive Traffic Signal $658,200 7.4% $48,800 14 Old Crow Canyon Rd. Corridor Improvement $6,739,200 100.0% $6,739,200 15 Crow Canyon Rd. / Iron Horse Trail Bicycle
Pedestrian Overcrossing $20,700,000 30.5% $6,317,600
16 Citywide Bicycle Network Improvements &
Enhancements $50,443,500 30.5% $15,395,400
17 Radar Speed Display Sign $52,650 30.5% $16,100
18 Citywide Intelligent Transportation System Upgrade $41,852,900 30.5% $12,773,500 19 Bike Master Plan Update $176,000 100.0% $176,000
20 ITS Master Plan Update $110,000 100.0% $110,000
21 Local Roadway Safety Plan Projects $2,086,900 30.5% $636,900 22 Future Nexus Study Update $80,000 100.0% $80,000
23 Smart Signals Project $248,175 100%* $248,200
24 Bollinger Canyon Rd. Sidewalk Improvement $891,955 18.6% $165,600 Total $133,011,180 36.9% $49,109,900
Sources: City of San Ramon CIP, 2023; Contra Costa County, Contra Costa Transportation Authority, CCTA Model; Fehr & Peers, 2021.

Additional Kimley-Horn model analysis, 2023.
* Total cost for Smart Signals project for the signals within the City is 2,163,683. The proportion of Citywide project eligible for inclusion in SRTIF program is 30.5% which is higher than the required 11.47% local match for the available funding for this project.

Therefore, 100% of the project cost is considered eligible for in SRTIF program.

5.3.b
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: B: Project Costs Eligible for TIF Program (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update) Attachment C: Fee Calculation per Land Use Category
Land Use Category Unit Fee per
Trip
Adjusted PM Peak
Trip Demand Factor
Raw Fee
per Unit
Administrative
Charge (2%)
Total Fee
per Unit
Residential
Single Family < 1,000 SF DU $3,846 0.88 $3,370 $67 $3,438 Single Family 1,000-1,499 SF DU $4,170 0.88 $3,655 $73 $3,728 Single Family 1,500-1,999 SF DU $4,355 0.88 $3,817 $76 $3,893 Single Family 2,000-2,499 SF DU $4,494 0.88 $3,939 $79 $4,018 Single Family 2,500-2,999 SF DU $4,634 0.88 $4,061 $81 $4,142 Single Family 3,000-3,999 SF DU $4,773 0.88 $4,183 $84 $4,266 Single Family >4,000 SF DU $4,819 0.88 $4,223 $84 $4,308 Multi-family DU $4,634 0.48 $2,203 $44 $2,247
Other PM Peak
Hour Trip $4,634 1.00 $4,634 $93 $4,726
Nonresidential
Retail KSF $4,634 1.72 $7,973 $159 $8,132
Office KSF $4,634 2.16 $10,005 $200 $10,205
Service Commercial1 KSF $4,634 - $4,652 $93 $4,745
Other PM Peak
Hour Trip $4,634 1.00 $4,634 $93 $4,726
1 The Service Commercial Raw Fee per Unit was calculated to maintain the same relationship between the Office fee and the Service Commercial fee that is contained in the City’s current fee schedule.

Source: Fehr & Peers, Nexus Study 2021 and Kimley-Horn, Nexus Study 2023. Fee per Single Family DUs developed based AB 602 Housing Analysis.

5.3.c
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: C: Fee Calculation Per Land Use Category (4200 : Draft Traffic Impact Fee Update)

FINANCE COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT
DATE: December 11, 2023
TO: Finance Committee/City Manager
FROM: Maria Fierner, Public Works Director
By: Deborah Fehr, Senior Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: Contra Costa Transportation Authority Countywide SMART Signals Project Funding Agreement and Allocation to Cover Matching Fund Requirements for the One Bay Area, Cycle 3 Program Grant Award

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The SMART Signals Project in Contra Costa County is a Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) led Countywide project to upgrade traffic signal systems and communication systems throughout its 19 cities/towns and unincorporated Contra Costa County. CCTA applied for and received One Bay Area, Cycle 3 (OBAG 3) federal funds for the project. The City’s portion of the grant award is $2,163,683 and requires an 11.47% local match in the amount of $248,175. A proposed SMART Signals Funding Agreement between Contra Costa Transportation Authority and the City of San Ramon for cost sharing commitments to construct the Countywide SMART Signals Project is required. The local match can be funded by the Traffic Impact FeeImprovement Fund (TIF, # 214) fund.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that the Finance Committee review and provide comments to staff on the proposed SMART Signals Funding Agreement between the Contra Costa Transportation Authority and the City of San Ramon for cost sharing commitments to construct the Countywide SMART Signals Project through the existing Citywide Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Upgrade Project (CIP 975594), including the allocation of TIF funds to cover the matching fund requirements for the One Bay Area, Cycle 3 Program grant award.

BACKGROUND
The SMART Signals project in Contra Costa County is a CCTA-led Countywide project to upgrade traffic signal systems and communication systems throughout its 19 cities/towns and unincorporated Contra Costa County. Ultimately, the project will develop, manage, and implement Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) initiatives such as upgrading the existing legacy systems, providing interconnectivity throughout Contra Costa County signal systems, and enhance the sharing of real-time information and data between agencies.

5.4 Packet Pg. 160
In 2022, CCTA applied for and received a total of $26,555,000 in OBAG 3 federal funds for the Project. The Project framework was initially presented by CCTA in 2022 to a number of committees including SWAT TAC, SWAT, and Innovate 680 PAC. Comments and feedback from elected officials, stakeholders, and agency staff all agreed this Countywide Smart Signals Project would be a great start in conjunction with the Innovate 680 Advanced Technology goals to lay the foundation for connectivity of signals along key corridors such as I-680, and to link state and local traffic signals through a central data system. The total cost of the Project is $30,774,422, which includes a combination of local matching funds from each of the 19 cities/towns and unincorporated Contra Costa County, Local Partnership Program funds, and matching funds from CCTA. The City’s portion of the grant award is $2,163,683 and requires an

11.47% local match of $248,175.

DISCUSSION
As CCTA is the lead agency responsible for the administration, design, and construction of this Project, the City is required to enter into a Funding Agreement (Attachment A) that has been forwarded to the City by CCTA for execution. The City Attorney has reviewed the Funding Agreement and concluded that the updated terms and provisions are reasonable and acceptable to the City. As this Project consists of several elements including traffic signal vehicle/bicycle video detection, fiber optic interconnect, and video analytics, it is recommended that the funding match amount of $248,175 be allocated from the TIF fund by means of incorporating this Project into the existing Citywide Intelligent Transportation System Update Project (CIP 975594).

CCTA will be the lead agency responsible for the administration, design, and construction to upgrade traffic signal communication systems at 328 intersections within Contra Costa County on behalf of all 19 cities/towns and unincorporated communities located along major arterials streets designated as Routes of Regional Significance. Many of the existing signal systems are using outdated technology that lacks interconnectivity without fiber optics and/or ethernet based communication making traffic signal synchronization and coordination nearly impossible. This SMART Signals Project will unify the major traffic corridors in an interconnected system with the ability to monitor traffic conditions in real-time and assist in managing traffic during major incidents that cause disruptions to the normal flow of traffic.

Specifically for San Ramon, the Project will provide traffic signal hardware and operational upgrades along the San Ramon Valley Boulevard, Bollinger Canyon Road, and Crow Canyon Road corridors through implementation of video/radar vehicle and bicycle detection systems, fiber optic interconnect, CCTV cameras, traffic signal synchronization, and video analytics to improve signal timing and coordination.

CCTA will utilize local Measure J funding for the planning and environmental study phases of the Project. CCTA will also be the lead in design, bidding, construction, and inspection of the implementation of the SMART Signals Project. Each local agency needs to provide its local match contribution to CCTA; therefore, the City is required to enter into a Funding Agreement.

5.4 Packet Pg. 161
The focus of the Funding Agreement is to secure local match commitments from each city/town prior to starting design of the Project. A separate Ownership, Operation, and Maintenance (OOM) Agreement will be drafted in late 2023 or early 2024 to detail when regional operation of the signals will be implemented and the level of maintenance to be performed by each city/town to ensure proper connectivity. A draft version of the OOM Agreement is attached for informational purposes (Attachment B). The signal upgrades are expected to be designed in 2024 and constructed in 2025.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
The Five-Year 2023-2028 Capital Improvement Program authorized a Project budget of $2,278,800 for the Citywide Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Upgrade Project (CIP 975594). The OBAG 3 Program’s grant award of $2,163,683 requires a total of $248,175 in local match, which is the 11.47% funding match requirement of the grant, for construction of the SMART Signal upgrades at 24 intersections within the City of San Ramon. It is recommended that the Citywide Intelligent Transportation System Upgrade Project (CIP 975594) incorporate the City’s scope and financial portion of the Countywide SMART Signals Project; allocate appropriate $248,175 from the TIF Fund (# 214) to cover the funding match requirement; and increase the total Project Budget authorization to $2,526,975.

NEXT STEPS

1. Staff will incorporate comments received from the Finance Committee for the Funding Agreement, add project scope, and local match funding allocation from the TIF Fund to the existing CIP 975594 Project.

2. The Funding Agreement, and local match funding allocation from the TIF Fund will be presented to City Council for approval.

3. Once approved and funding allocated from the TIF Fund, the Funding Agreement will be signed and returned to CCTA.

ATTACHMENT
A: CCTA and Individual Smart Signals Funding Agreement DRAFT B: Draft Ownership, Operation and Maintenance (OOM) Agreement C: SMART Signals Informational Flyer

5.4 Packet Pg. 162
FUNDING AGREEMENT xxxx
Countywide Smart Signals Design and Construction Phases

29611360.1/060323.0005
FUNDING AGREEMENT NO. XXXX

BETWEEN

THE CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
AND

THE CITY OF SAN RAMON

FOR COST SHARING COMMITMENTS TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT THE

COUNTYWIDE SMART SIGNALS PROJECT
This Agreement is made and entered into on ______________, 2023 by the CITY OF SAN RAMON, a Municipal Corporation hereinafter referred to as ("CITY") and the CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY hereinafter referred to as ("AUTHORITY"). CITY and AUTHORITY are collectively referred to herein as the “Parties” and each individually as a “Party.”

RECITALS

1. AUTHORITY is the project sponsor and designated lead agency for implementing the Countywide Smart Signals Project within Contra Costa County, hereinafter referred to as “PROJECT”, which is a program to install signal system and intelligent transportation system (ITS) equipment upgrades to key identified intersections within Contra Costa County cities with the objective to coordinate and synchronize the timing of the signals.

2. AUTHORITY is the recipient of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s (MTC’s) One Bay Area Cycle 3 (OBAG 3) funds for design, construction, and deployment of the PROJECT.

3. CITY and AUTHORITY have identified 24 intersections to recommend for signal system and intelligent transportation system (ITS) equipment upgrades for inclusion in the PROJECT estimated at $2,163,683.00, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

4. CITY agrees to provide AUTHORITY with the minimum 11.47% local matching funds to the OBAG 3 funds in the amount of $248,174.44 11in Fiscal Year 2023-24 to pay for the design and installation of upgraded equipment located within CITY’s right-of-way and cost of construction as part of the PROJECT.

5. CITY and AUTHORITY agree that the final matching funds requirements may be adjusted accordingly based on the final actual design and construction costs incurred and will be reconciled at the completion of the PROJECT as defined in paragraph 6 below.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the AUTHORITY and CITY do hereby agree as follows:

SECTION I
CITY AGREES:

1. To provide AUTHORITY matching funds for upgrading equipment and construction cost for the CITY’s portion of the PROJECT in an amount of $248,174.44, which represents 11.47% of the OBAG3 funds of $2,163,683.00, no later than 30 days from receiving an invoice from AUTHORITY.

ATTACHMENT A5.4.a
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: A: CCTA and Individual Smart Signals Funding Agreement DRAFT (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement) FUNDING AGREEMENT xxxx
Countywide Smart Signals Design and Construction Phases

29611360.1/060323.0005

2. To work collaboratively with AUTHORITY to implement the PROJECT.

SECTION II
AUTHORITY AGREES:

1. To lead the development process including planning, design, construction, and deployment of the PROJECT, as described in Exhibit A and the Operations and Maintenance Agreement to be negotiated by the CITY and AUTHORITY following execution of this Agreement.

2. To submit an invoice to CITY for an amount of $248,174.44 prior to December 31, 2023.

3. To work collaboratively with CITY to implement the PROJECT.

SECTION III
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED:

1. (a) That the cost to complete PROJECT is only an estimate and may require adjustments depending on the final cost. At the completion of the PROJECT, and if AUTHORITY determines that the match amount provided by CITY is insufficient, it will notify and seek approval of CITY to provide additional matching funds. Completion of the Project is defined as when AUTHORITY accepts and certifies that all phases of the PROJECT construction–including but not limited to installation, deployment, and activation of equipment–are completed.
(b) If AUTHORITY determines that the match amount provided by CITY exceeded the amount needed to complete the PROJECT, then AUTHORITY will refund CITY the balance of the original match amount provided by CITY and indicated in paragraph 1 of Section I.

2. Term: This Agreement will remain in effect through December 31, 2028, or at the completion of the PROJECT, whichever occurs first, or until discharged as provided in Paragraph 3 below or as a result of paragraph 12 below.

3. Discharge: This Agreement shall be subject to discharge as follows:
(a) Either Party may terminate this Agreement at any time until construction of the PROJECT begins, other than for breach. Either Party may terminate by giving written notice of termination to the other Party which shall specify both the cause and the effective date of termination. Notice of termination under this provision shall be given at least ninety (90) days before the effective date of such termination. Once construction of the PROJECT begins, neither party may terminate this Agreement unless there is a breach as addressed in paragraph 3(b) below. (b) This Agreement may be canceled by a Party for breach of any obligation, covenant, or condition hereof by the other Party, upon notice to the breaching Party. With respect to any breach that is reasonably capable of being cured, the breaching Party shall have 30 days from the date of the notice to initiate steps to cure. If the breaching party diligently pursues cure, such party shall be allowed a reasonable time to cure, not to exceed sixty (60) days from the date of the initial notice, unless a further extension is granted by the non-breaching Party. On cancellation, the non-breaching party retains the same rights as a Party exercising its right to terminate under the provisions of paragraph

5.4.a
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: A: CCTA and Individual Smart Signals Funding Agreement DRAFT (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement) FUNDING AGREEMENT xxxx
Countywide Smart Signals Design and Construction Phases

29611360.1/060323.0005
3(a), except that the canceling Party also retains any remedy for breach of the whole contract or any unperformed balance.
(c) By mutual consent of both Parties, this Agreement may be terminated at any time. (d) In the event of termination, AUTHORITY shall reimburse CITY, if AUTHORITY deems necessary, for overpayment by CITY based on the difference between actual cost share and estimated cost share, which such difference shall be determined in AUTHORITY’s sole discretion. In no event shall the maximum expenditure allowed under this Agreement, as it may be adjusted by a written amendment signed by both Parties, be exceeded.

4. Indemnity: It is mutually understood and agreed, relative to the reciprocal indemnification of AUTHORITY and CITY:
(a) That neither AUTHORITY, nor any officer or employee thereof, shall be responsible for, and CITY shall fully indemnify and hold harmless AUTHORITY against, any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction by CITY under the Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully indemnify and hold the AUTHORITY harmless from any liability imposed for injury as defined by Government Code Section 810.8 occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by CITY under this Agreement or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to CITY under this Agreement.
(b) That neither CITY, nor any officer or employee thereof, shall be responsible for, and AUTHORITY shall fully indemnify and hold harmless CITY against any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by AUTHORITY under or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction by AUTHORITY under the Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, AUTHORITY shall fully indemnify and hold the CITY harmless from any liability imposed for injury as defined by Government Code Section 810.8 occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by AUTHORITY under this Agreement or in connection with any work, authority, or jurisdiction delegated to AUTHORITY under this Agreement.

5. Notices: Any notice that may be required under this Agreement shall be in writing, shall be effective when received, and shall be given by personal service, or by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, to the addresses set forth below, or to such addresses which may be specified in writing to the Parties hereto.

Steven Spedowfski
City Manager
City of San Ramon
7000 Bollinger Canyon Road
San Ramon, CA 94583
Timothy Haile
Executive Director
Contra Costa Transportation Authority
2999 Oak Road, Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94597

5.4.a
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: A: CCTA and Individual Smart Signals Funding Agreement DRAFT (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement) FUNDING AGREEMENT xxxx
Countywide Smart Signals Design and Construction Phases

29611360.1/060323.0005

6. Additional Acts and Documents: Each Party agrees to do all such things and take all such actions, and to make, execute and deliver such other documents and instruments, as shall be reasonably requested to carry out the provisions, intent and purpose of this Agreement.

7. Integration: This Agreement represents the entire Agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. No representations, warranties, inducements or oral agreements have been made by any of the Parties except as expressly set forth herein, or in other contemporaneous written agreements.

8. Amendment: This Agreement may not be changed, modified or rescinded except in writing, signed by all Parties hereto, and any attempt at oral modification of this Agreement shall be void and of no effect.

9. Independent Agency: AUTHORITY renders its services under this Agreement as an independent agency. None of the AUTHORITY’s agents or employees shall be agents or employees of the CITY.

10. Assignment: This Agreement may not be assigned, transferred, hypothecated, or pledged by any Party without the express written consent of the other Party.

11. Binding on Successors, etc.: This Agreement shall be binding upon the successor(s), assignee(s) or transferee(s) of the AUTHORITY or CITY as the case may be. This provision shall not be construed as an authorization to assign, transfer, hypothecate or pledge this Agreement other than as provided above.

12. Severability: Should any part of this Agreement be determined to be unenforceable, invalid, or beyond the authority of either Party to enter into or carry out, such determination shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement which shall continue in full force and effect; provided that, the remainder of this Agreement can, absent the excised portion, be reasonably interpreted to give effect to the intentions of the Parties.

13. Limitation: All obligations of AUTHORITY under the terms of this Agreement are expressly subject to the AUTHORITY's continued authorization to collect and expend the sales tax proceeds provided by MEASURE C and MEASURE J. If for any reason the AUTHORITY's right to collect or expend such sales tax proceeds is terminated or suspended in whole or part, the AUTHORITY shall promptly notify CITY, and the Parties shall consult on a course of action to determine how to accomplish the PROJECT or if this Agreement should be terminated. If, after sixty (60) working days of the termination or suspension of sales tax proceeds authority, a course of action is not agreed upon by the Parties, this Agreement shall be deemed terminated by mutual or joint consent; provided, that any obligation to fund from the date of the notice shall be expressly limited by and subject to (i) the lawful ability of the AUTHORITY to expend sales tax proceeds for the purposes of the Agreement; and (ii) the availability, taking into consideration all the obligations of the AUTHORITY under all outstanding contracts, agreements to other obligations of the AUTHORITY, of funds for such purposes.

14. No Third-Party Beneficiaries: This Agreement is not for the benefit of any person or entity other than the Parties.

5.4.a
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: A: CCTA and Individual Smart Signals Funding Agreement DRAFT (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement) FUNDING AGREEMENT xxxx
Countywide Smart Signals Design and Construction Phases

29611360.1/060323.0005

15. Dispute Resolution: The Parties shall work together in the spirit of good faith and cooperation to successfully implement this Agreement. Should a substantive disagreement arise between the Parties, the disagreement shall immediately be raised between the Parties. Prior to initiating any legal action, the Parties agree to meet in good faith to attempt to resolve any dispute, including but limited to meetings between executive management and participating in mediation. The Parties shall jointly select and engage the effort of a mediator to help resolve the dispute. The Parties shall equally share the costs of the mediator. If the issue is still unresolved, either Party may bring a legal action seeking resolution of the disagreement. However, any and all legal actions may only be brought if the preceding dispute resolution process has been satisfied.

16. Venue: This Agreement and all work performed thereunder shall be interpreted under and pursuant to the laws of the State of California. The Parties agree that the jurisdiction and venue of any dispute arising under this Agreement shall be the Superior Court of Contra Costa County.

17. Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed in any number of original counterpart signature pages, and each counterpart signature page shall be attached to and incorporated into this original Agreement.

City of San Ramon
“CITY”
Contra Costa Transportation Authority
“AUTHORITY”
By: By:

Steven Spedowfski, City Manager Federal Glover, Chair
ATTEST:

By: By:

Christina Franco, City Clerk Tarienne Glover, Clerk of the Board APPROVED as to form:

By: By:

Martin Lysons, City Attorney Fennemore Wendel, Legal Counsel

5.4.a
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: A: CCTA and Individual Smart Signals Funding Agreement DRAFT (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement) 29611360.1/060323.0005
FUNDING AGREEMENT NO. XXXX
between
The Contra Costa Transportation Authority
and
The City of San Ramon

EXHIBIT A

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

BACKGROUND
The Smart Signals project in Contra Costa County is a CCTA led countywide project to upgrade traffic signal system and communication systems throughout its 19 cities and unincorporated communities.

Contra Costa County is home to 19 cities/towns and the County, which includes numerous unincorporated communities. There are approximately 1400 traffic signals within the County, Caltrans-owned and various city-owned. Most of these traffic signals are located either along major arterials, including State Routes, identified as Routes of Regional Significance (RSS) or other major and minor arterials in the cities/towns.

The project will develop, manage, and implement Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) initiatives such as upgrading the existing legacy systems, providing interconnectivity throughout Contra Costa County signal systems and enhance the sharing of real-time information between agencies and the public.

The existing traffic signal systems in most jurisdictions located within Contra Costa County are legacy systems and are outdated or antiquated compared to newer traffic signal systems. These signal systems currently lack the communication infrastructure such as fiber and cellular/wireless-based communication, which makes it difficult to implement traffic signal synchronization and coordination between traffic signals along an arterial. Most corridors do not currently include Signal Control and Prioritization (SCP) technologies to promote transit usage to reduce delay and travel times for transit vehicles and reduce response time for emergency vehicles.

These deficiencies result in severe traffic congestion within the cities/towns and may result in spillover onto freeways and cause a chain reaction of congestion along local arterials. The current system contributes to overall commuter travel times and delays, increases greenhouse gas emissions and fuel consumption, as well as incidents and collisions. These deficiencies were documented following extensive discussions with the cities and towns regarding traffic signal operation within the Contra Costa County.

CCTA and the project Stakeholders have initially identified these deficiencies, which are translated as the following project goals: 1) Improve safety and minimize crashes, injuries, and fatalities between motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians; 2) Optimize mobility along major corridors and RRS; and 3) Advance to Smart City and Internet of Things (IOT) solutions.

PROJECT ELEMENTS
The Smart Signals project will develop, manage, and implement ITS initiatives that improve the safety and efficiency of multimodal mobility, maximize highway and arterial system throughput, and improve operational efficiency, safety, and reduce environmental impact throughout the county. By upgrading the existing legacy systems and providing interconnectivity throughout Contra Costa County signal systems,

5.4.a
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: A: CCTA and Individual Smart Signals Funding Agreement DRAFT (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement)

RESPONSIBILITY

PROJECT ACTIVITY STATE AUTHORITY
CITY
DRAFT 2-08-06 FUNDING AGREEMENT No. XX.XX.XX
Exhibit C City of San Ramon

29611360.1/060323.0005
the county’s traffic signal systems can be prepared for future emerging technologies including connected and/or autonomous vehicles, big data, integrated corridor management (ICM), enable implementation of incident management strategies and Smart Cities initiatives. This solution can enhance the sharing of realtime information between agencies and the public using existing and next generation ITS technologies.

The upgraded traffic signal systems and signal interconnect will help smooth traffic flow and ease recurring traffic congestion by expanding mode choice options and reducing travel time on local streets and roads. Upgraded traffic signals will benefit pedestrians and transit commuters by reducing wait times at intersections, improving total travel time for all modes while making transit and pedestrian more viable transportation options. The Smart Signal systems would also improve the safety of pedestrians, bicyclists, vulnerable road users, and people with disabilities by deployment of detection systems.

To accomplish these goals, CCTA is applying a Smart Signal approach that will include the implementation of ITS equipment including upgraded traffic signal controllers and cabinets, upgraded Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) for each agency to provide remote command and control from a centralized Traffic Management Center (TMC) or Traffic Operations Center (TOC) location, Closed-circuit Television (CCTV) cameras, SCP for transit and emergency vehicles, and vehicle detection systems deployed on predefined designated arterials and state routes. These improvements will provide local cities and Caltrans day-to-day county-wide traffic management capabilities in addressing recurrent traffic congestion as well as provide CCTA capabilities for managing the system during non-recurring traffic congestion caused by diverted traffic due to major incidents on the freeway or during any evacuation efforts.

The PROJECT’s key features and benefits include but are not limited to some of the following:
• Providing infrastructure for a countywide traffic management system • Upgrading local signal controllers and signal system hardware, software, and firmware • Deploying bicycle and pedestrian detection software for vulnerable road user protection • Providing SCP, including Transit Signal Priority (TSP) and Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) capabilities
• Enabling local event management signal timing options • Taking a proactive approach to safety by identifying “near miss” situations for analysis • Enabling cities and CCTA to proactively manage day-to-day traffic • Enabling cities to proactively manage traffic on local streets that has diverted off the freeway due to a major freeway incident
• Identifying alternative routes with timing optimized for incident management • Allowing shared control and operation, improving cross jurisdictional traffic management • Allowing cities/CCTA access to monitor all CCTV cameras and traffic signals for the purpose of optimizing day-to-day operations
Deployment of the Smart Signals Project is expected to result in operational and safety improvements for all modes of transportation, such as:

5.4.a
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: A: CCTA and Individual Smart Signals Funding Agreement DRAFT (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement)

RESPONSIBILITY

PROJECT ACTIVITY STATE AUTHORITY
CITY
DRAFT 2-08-06 FUNDING AGREEMENT No. XX.XX.XX
Exhibit C City of San Ramon

29611360.1/060323.0005
• Decrease in travel time,
• Decrease in total delay,
• Reduction in number of stops
• Reduction in secondary accidents
• Decrease in fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions • Promotion of transit ridership
• Reduction of response time for emergency vehicles
When operating together, these enhancements increase safety and reliability, and support environmental sustainability, economic development, and equitable access for all travelers.

CITY OF SAN RAMON ELEMENTS
The signals located at the following intersection are included in the Project and are proposed to receive Smart Signal upgrades. (See Table 1 and Figure 1 below) Table 1: City of San Ramon PROJECT Intersections

LIST OF INTERSECTIONS
Signal No. Primary Street Secondary Street
1 Bollinger Canyon Rd Alcosta Blvd
2 Bollinger Canyon Rd Civic Center/Marker Place
3 Bollinger Canyon Rd Bishop Ranch 1 East
4 Bollinger Canyon Rd Camino Ramon / Bishop Ranch 1
5 Bollinger Canyon Rd Sunset Dr/Chevron Dr
6 Crow Canyon Rd Bollinger Canyon Rd
7 Crow Canyon Rd Park PI /Porter Dr
8 Crow Canyon Rd Park PI/Deerwood Rd
9 Crow Canyon Rd Old Mill Rd
10 Crow Canyon Rd Old Crow Canyon Rd
11 Crow Canyon Rd Twin Creeks Dr
12 Crow Canyon Rd Crow Canyon PI
13 Crow Canyon Rd Camino Ramon
14 Crow Canyon Rd Iron Horse Trail
15 Crow Canyon Rd Alcosta Blvd
16 San Ramon Valley Blvd Pine Valley Rd
17 San Ramon Valley Blvd Montevideo Dr
18 San Ramon Valley Blvd Harness Dr
19 San Ramon Valley Blvd Bollinger Canyon Rd
20 San Ramon Valley Blvd Norris Canyon Rd

5.4.a
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: A: CCTA and Individual Smart Signals Funding Agreement DRAFT (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement)

RESPONSIBILITY

PROJECT ACTIVITY STATE AUTHORITY
CITY
DRAFT 2-08-06 FUNDING AGREEMENT No. XX.XX.XX
Exhibit C City of San Ramon

29611360.1/060323.0005
21 San Ramon Valley Blvd Parking Lot
22 San Ramon Valley Blvd Crow Canyon Rd
23 San Ramon Valley Blvd Fostoria Way
24 San Ramon Valley Blvd Alcosta Blvd
The recommended upgrades for signals located in San Ramon include:
• Signal controller firmware updates
• Video/Radar detection
• Install fiber through existing SIC conduit
• Pan-Tilt-Zoom (PTZ) cameras
• An Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS)
• Traffic signal synchronization, and
• Video Analytics.

Based on preliminary estimates, the upgraded equipment, including cost of construction, is shown below.

The City is responsible to provide the minimum 11.47% match. • Total Number of Signals – 24
• Total funding – $2,163,683.00
Local match required – $248,174.44 (11.47%)

5.4.a
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: A: CCTA and Individual Smart Signals Funding Agreement DRAFT (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement) OWNERSHIP, OPERATION and MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT

BETWEEN

CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
AND

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA

FOR THE

CONTRA COSTA COUNTYWIDE SMART SIGNALS PROJECT
This Agreement by and between the Contra Costa Transportation Authority, hereinafter referred to as “AUTHORITY” and the County of Contra Costa, hereinafter referred to individually as “COUNTY” and Authority and County are referred to as “PARTIES”, is for the purpose of outlining and defining the roles, responsibilities, terms, and conditions of ownership, operation, and maintenance of equipment and components that are incorporated and integrated into the Contra Costa Countywide Smart Signals Project, hereinafter referred to as “Smart Signals Project”, “Smart Signals”, or “the Project”. (“Project.”).

RECITALS
A. AUTHORITY and COUNTY agree to work cooperatively to develop and implement the Smart Signals Project.

B. The PARTIES agree on the vision and goal of the Project, as follows: Improve mobility, travel time reliability, and safety for all travelers, including pedestrians and bicyclists, by enhancing the transportation system on Major Arterials including the Routes of Regional Significance (RRS) throughout Contra Costa County through strategic deployment, implementation, and integration of advanced technologies and interagency coordination.

C. The Project, located in Contra Costa County within the 19 cities/towns and unincorporated communities along major arterials including routes identified as RRS, will develop, manage, and implement Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) initiatives such as upgrading the existing legacy systems, providing interconnectivity throughout the signal system in the County and enhance the sharing of real-time information between agencies and the public. A compatible signal technology and communication system throughout the County will enable the region to prepare for emerging transportation technologies and future Smart Cities initiatives. The Project includes cloud-based Transit Signal Priority (TSP) technologies to promote transit usage reducing delay and transit times for transit vehicles. The Project includes Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) to facilitate more efficient movement of emergency vehicles. The Project includes video analytics that provides the ability to identify "near miss" situations and take proactive approaches to prevent future occurrences.

DRAFT

ATTACHMENT B

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: B: Draft Ownership, Operation and Maintenance (OOM) Agreement (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement) D. This Agreement defines the overall commitment and responsibilities regarding ownership, operations, and maintenance of the Smart Signals unique equipment located within the Town/City’s right-of-way during day-to-day operations and during various traffic scenarios, as applicable.

E. This Agreement defines the responsibility of the signal timing to remain under the County responsibility unless during a significant event as defined in the Concept of Operations Project report.

F. Other agreements will be entered into between the AUTHORITY and the PARTIES separately, which includes the individual Funding Agreements.

AGREEMENT
The PARTIES hereto agree as follows:

The new ITS elements to be installed for the Smart Signals Project, referred to as “New” equipment, may include the following equipment and components:
• Signal controller firmware updates
• Video/Radar/Thermal detection
• Wireless/Cellular communication between the signals
• Ethernet over Copper (EOC) communication between the signals • Fixed or pan-tilt-zoom (PTZ) close circuit television (CCTV) cameras • Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS)
• Traffic signal synchronization
• Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP)
• Transit Signal Priority (TSP)
• Video analytics
• Battery Back-up Systems (BBS)
The following elements, located within JURISDICTION right-of-way, are considered existing COUNTY-owned equipment that is being upgraded to meet the operational needs of the Smart Signals Project, referred to as “Upgraded” equipment:
• Traffic signal controllers, Communication equipment, and signal controller firmware, Detection system, Cameras, ATMS, and BBS.

AUTHORITY agrees to seek and secure the necessary funding required for maintaining the Smart Signals “New” equipment located within COUNTY’s right-of-way.

DRAFT

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: B: Draft Ownership, Operation and Maintenance (OOM) Agreement (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement) AUTHORITY will advertise, award, and administer the construction contract for the Smart Signals Project. AUTHORITY will own the Smart Signals equipment added or constructed during the construction phase and will relinquish all interest it might have in any and all ”Upgraded” Constructed Equipment to COUNTY upon completion of construction and said transfer of interest,
Ownership

1. COUNTY shall continue to own the traffic signal system located within COUNTY rightof-way, which were “Upgraded” and exclusively own all “New” CCTA furnished Smart Signal Systems equipment located within COUNTY right-of-way, including but not limited to:
a. Signal controller firmware updates
b. Video/Radar/Thermal detection
c. Cellular/Wireless/EOC communication between the signals d. Fixed or pan-tilt-zoom (PTZ) close circuit television (CCTV) cameras e. Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS)
f. Power Back-up Systems

2. COUNTY is also responsible for the electrical costs located with the COUNTY right-ofway.

3. CCTA will own the cloud-based software for Transit Signal Priority, Emergency Vehicle Preemption, and the Video Analytics system.

Operations

1. COUNTY shall continue to operate the Smart Signal “upgraded” and “New” COUNTYowned traffic signal controllers, traffic signals, and operational software system located within COUNTY right-of-way at COUNTY’s expense, during daily operations as per the scenarios identified in the Concept of Operations (ConOps).

2. COUNTY shall have the rights to view full system CCTV camera streaming images.

During daily operations COUNTY and the Regional Operator may control the PTZ(s) with priority given to the COUNTY. A framework to establish priority, rules, and defaults will be developed separately.

3. COUNTY shall have access to view full system vehicle detection data for normal and special operation scenarios. Control of the vehicle detection system will remain with DRAFT

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: B: Draft Ownership, Operation and Maintenance (OOM) Agreement (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement) COUNTY.

4. COUNTY shall coordinate efforts jointly with Regional Operator to operate the signals during major incidents and special events as part of the Regional Traffic Management Strategies to allow the Regional Operator to activate measures (as included in the Operational Scenarios of the ConOps) aimed at improving traffic operations across multiple jurisdictions. These measures will be predefined and approved by all impacted agencies in advance.

5. Additional considerations between COUNTY and AUTHORITY and possibly other JURSDICTIONS, shall be developed as needed for the Smart Signals equipment located in the COUNTY limits during predefined Operational Scenarios.

Maintenance

1. COUNTY shall maintain the Smart Signals “Upgraded” COUNTY-owned traffic signal controllers, traffic signals, camera systems, communications equipment, and operational software system located with COUNTY’s right-of-way at COUNTY’s expense.

2. COUNTY shall assume the associated electrical costs of the Smart Signals devices located within JURISDICITON’s right-of-way.

3. AUTHORITY will not pay for graffiti removal on Smart Signals equipment. COUNTY shall be responsible for graffiti removal on devices located within COUNTY’s right-ofway.

4. a. Option A – AUTHORITY agrees for the County to continue to maintain their traffic signal system and the cities that the County currently maintains, including the “Upgraded” and “New” equipment installed as part of the Smart Signals project.
b. Option B – For the cities that have specialized resources in maintaining ITS equipment, cities can continue to maintain their traffic signal system, including the “Upgraded” and “New” equipment installed as part of the Smart Signals project. c. Option C - AUTHORITY agrees to obtain a maintenance contractor(s) that specializes in ITS equipment. AUTHORITY or its maintenance contractor will obtain the necessary encroachment permit at no cost from COUNTY for work within the COUNTY’s right-of-way. AUTHORITY, or its assignee, shall serve as lead agency to administer the maintenance service contract or to over DRAFT

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: B: Draft Ownership, Operation and Maintenance (OOM) Agreement (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement) administration of the maintenance service contract for its Smart Signals maintenance responsibility.

5. If COUNTY is aware of Smart Signals equipment damage caused by a third party, COUNTY will notify and assist AUTHORITY in pursuing a claim against the offending party.

6. If AUTHORITY is aware of Smart Signals equipment damage caused by a third party, AUTHORITY will notify and assist COUNTY in pursuing a claim against the offending party.

7. Maintenance activities of the Smart Signals equipment shall include but are not limited to the following tasks: adopt a performance-based approach, establish a proactive annual maintenance program, perform regular maintenance, repairs, replacements; assure equipment is functioning properly.

8. Maintenance service shall be scheduled on an annual basis.

Table 1 is the summary of the Operations and Maintenance between the County and the Authority.

Table 1: Operations and Maintenance Summary
DRAFT

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: B: Draft Ownership, Operation and Maintenance (OOM) Agreement (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement) Funding for Maintenance Activities

1. AUTHORITY shall seek to secure the necessary funding required for maintaining the Smart Signals “New” equipment located within COUNTY’s right-of-way.

This agreement shall be effective as of ____________________ and continue until 2060, unless sooner terminated, or otherwise extended, by the agreement of the PARTIES.

This agreement may be modified only in writing and by mutual consent of the PARTIES.

Insurance
To be completed
Description Location Ownership3 Qty Unit Daily Non-Reccuring Congestion
Financial
Responsibility % Split4
Traffic Signal Controller/Firmware County ROW County 20 EA County County/CCTA County 100% Video Detection System County ROW County 20 EA County County County 100% Battery Backup System County ROW County 20 EA County County County 100% PTZ Camera County ROW County 20 EA County CCTA/County County 100% ATMS License County ROW County 1 EA County County County 100% Communications Infrastructure 5 County ROW County - LF n/a n/a 100% Communications Equipment 6 County ROW County 20 EA County CCTA County 100% Emergency Vehicle Preemption n/a CCTA 20 EA CCTA n/a CCTA 100% Transit Signal Priority n/a CCTA 20 EA CCTA n/a CCTA 100% Data/Video Analytics n/a CCTA 20 EA CCTA n/a CCTA 100%
Revised 10/18/23
Notes:
1) Assume operational cost is the responsibility of agency operating equipment during day-to-day and incidents 2) Preferred Option for software services: Combine funds from all agencies and fund one maintenance contract 3) Each city owns equipment located within each respective city limits 4) Admend existing maintenace agreements between County and City as necessary 5) Includes conduit, fiber, twisted wire copper, pull boxes, splice enclosures, etc. 6) Includes network switches, routers, modems, wireless AP, antennas, cabinets etc.

HARDWARE

SOFTWARE/SERVICES
SMART SIGNALS OPERATIONS1 MAINTENANCE2
DRAFT

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: B: Draft Ownership, Operation and Maintenance (OOM) Agreement (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement) AGREED AND EXECUTED BY:

____________________________________
County of Contra Costa Date

____________________________________
CCTA Date
DRAFT

5.4.b
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: B: Draft Ownership, Operation and Maintenance (OOM) Agreement (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement)

CONTRA COSTA COUNTYWIDE SMART SIGNALS
Contra Costa Transporta�on Authority (CCTA) is leading a Countywide Smart Signals Project (Project) to upgrade traffic signal and communica�on systems at 328 intersec�ons within Contra Costa County throughout the 19 ci�es/towns and unincorporated communi�es located along major arterial streets and roads designated as Routes of Regional Significance.

PURPOSE + NEED | Exis�ng traffic
signal systems in most ci�es within Contra
Costa County consist of outdated legacy
systems that lack fiber and/or ethernet
base communica�on making traffic signal
synchroniza�on and coordina�on
between traffic signals difficult.

Addi�onally, most corridors need Signal
Control and Priori�za�on (SCP)
technologies that can promote transit
usage and mode shi�. These opera�onal
deficiencies result in severe traffic
conges�on within the ci�es which can
also lead to spillover on the freeways;
increasing commuter travel �mes,
greenhouse gas emissions, fuel
consump�on, and accidents.

SOLUTION | Implementa�on of the planned Intelligent Transporta�on System (ITS) elements will unify Contra Costa County’s signal technology and communica�on systems to op�mize traffic flow. It will provide an interconnected Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) with the ability to monitor traffic condi�ons in real-�me, safely, and efficiently manage incidents, and share informa�on between agencies and the public.

BENEFITS
SAFETY
Upgrading traffic signal equipment
and applying smart control
systems at intersec�ons will:
► Improve emergency service
response �me;
► Help first responders and law
enforcement manage traffic or
crime incidents; and
► Implement Video analy�cs
that can iden�fy near miss
situa�ons, prevent future
occurrences, and reduce
secondary accidents.

OPERATIONAL

IMPROVEMENTS
Signal synchroniza�on and
implementa�on of SCP
technologies will:
► Smooth traffic flow and
reduce idling;
► Increase average speed;
► Decrease travel �me and total
delay;
► Reduce greenhouse gas
emissions; and
► Increase transit reliability by
improving on-�me service.

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

ENHANCEMENTS
Shared control and improved cross
jurisdic�onal traffic management will:
► Provide ci�es and Caltrans access to
monitor all videos and signals in
real-�me;
► Op�mize day-to-day traffic
opera�ons and manage local events
through signal �ming op�ons;
► Effec�vely manage arterial traffic
during major incidents on the
freeway, evacua�ons, or major
events; and
► Enable ci�es to priori�ze transit and
emergency vehicles.

The goals of the project are to improve safety, optimize mobility, prepare for emerging transportation technologies, and advance Smart Cities.

5.4.c
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: C: SMART Signals Informational Flyer (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement) CONTACT | John Hoang, Director, Planning - CCTA
Phone: 925.256.4729 I E-mail: [email protected]

KEY PROJECT FEATURES
►Traffic signal system upgrades
►ATMS upgrades for each agency to provide
remote command and control at a centralized
Traffic Management Center (TMC) loca�on
►Close Circuit Television (CCTV) cameras
►Pedestrian and bicycle detec�on system
►Shared control and opera�on to allow cross
jurisdic�onal traffic management
►Automated data collec�on
►SCP for transit and emergency vehicles
►Vehicle detec�on system on designated
arterials and state routes
FUNDING + SCHEDULE
Project Phase Total Cost Fund Source Start Date
Planning/ Conceptual $250,000 Measure J Jul-22
Environmental Studies (PA&ED) $440,280 Measure J Mar-23 Design Engineering (PS&E) $1,651,050 Local Match, OBAG 3* Sep-24 Construc�on $28,433,092 Local Match, OBAG 3, LPP-F** Sep-25 Total $ 30,774,422
*One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) 3 federal funding provided by Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). ** Local Partnership Program – Formulaic (LPP-F) state funding provided by California Transportation Commission (CTC).

STAKEHOLDERS
An�och Brentwood Clayton Concord Danville
El Cerrito Hercules Lafayete Mar�nez Moraga
Oakley Orinda Pinole Pitsburg Pleasant Hill
Richmond San Pablo San Ramon Walnut Creek Contra Costa County The project is being implemented in collaboration with Central Contra Costa Transit Authority (County Connection), Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority (Tri Delta Transit), Western Contra Costa County Transit (WestCAT), Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit), Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and MTC.

5.4.c
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: C: SMART Signals Informational Flyer (4199 : CCTA SMART Signals Funding Agreement)