Agenda packet — San Ramon City Council, June 10, 2025 (part 1 of 3)

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
June 10, 2025

WE PROVIDE EFFICIENT DELIVERY OF QUALITY PUBLIC SERVICES THAT ARE

ESSENTIAL TO THOSE WHO LIVE AND WORK IN SAN RAMON
Mark Armstrong, Mayor • Sridhar Verose, Vice Mayor
Richard Adler, Councilmember • Robert Jweinat, Councilmember • Marisol Rubio, Councilmember Council Chamber
7000 Bollinger Canyon Road
REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 PM
Agenda Questions: Please contact the City Clerk (925) 973-2539 or [email protected] Please refer to the end of the agenda to review options for participation in the meeting.

Unless stated otherwise on the agenda, every item on the agenda is exempt from CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(c), 15061(b)(3), 15273, 15378, 15301, 15323 and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065.

1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. ANNOUNCEMENTS

3.1 Changes and Additions to the Agenda

3.2 If you wish to speak under Public Comment or regarding an agenda item please fill out a speaker card located in the back of the room and submit it to the City Clerk.

4. PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the audience are encouraged to address the City Council on any non-agenda item relating to the business of the City Council. Comments are limited to three (3) minutes, or less time if a large number of speakers are anticipated. A speaker may not allocate their time to another speaker. All remarks shall be addressed to the City Council.

Comments from the public on non-agenda items may also be submitted by email to [email protected]. Comments received by email will not be read aloud; however, they will be forwarded to the Council for their consideration. If you wish to present your comments to the public, you may do so in-person during this Public Comment period. No Council action can be taken at this meeting on issues raised during public comment.

During public comment, members of the public are permitted to address the City Council only on the following:
 Any non-agenda item relating to the business of the City Council. 2 City Council Meeting – June 10, 2025
 Items that are on the Consent Calendar, including requests to pull an item from the consent calendar and the reason why you wish to pull the item or items. Please note that the decision to remove the item from the Consent Calendar is strictly at the discretion of the City Council.
 Requests for Future Agenda Items.
 Special Presentation Items under Section 6 of tonight’s Agenda.  Items that are not on the agenda and are within the City Council’s jurisdiction.

5. CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar items are considered routine and are acted upon by the City Council with a single action. Members of the audience wishing to provide public input may request (by email to the City Clerk or under Item 4 Public Comment) that the City Council remove the item from the Consent Calendar. Members of the public may request that items be removed from the Consent Calendar, however, the decision to remove the item is solely at the discretion of the City Council.

With respect to the approval of resolutions and ordinances, the reading of the title thereto shall be deemed a motion to waive a reading of the complete resolution or ordinance and unless there is a request by a Council member that the resolution or ordinance be read in full, further reading of the resolution or ordinance shall be deemed waived by unanimous consent of the Council.

5.1 Minutes of the City Council Regular Meeting - May 27, 2025 Recommendation: Approve Minutes

5.2 Confirming San Ramon Representative Appointment to the Contra Costa County Mosquito & Vector Control District Board of Trustees
Recommendation: Appoint Peter Pay with a term to expire June 2029.

5.3 Confirming the San Ramon Representative Appointment to the County Connection Advisory Committee
Recommendation: Confirm Appointment of Ivan Fedorenko to the Committee.

5.4 Resolution No. 2025-060 - Accepting the Work by Sposeto Engineering, Inc. for Curb Ramp Construction and Miscellaneous Concrete Repairs for Pavement Management 2024 and 2025 Projects and Other Curb Ramp Locations As-Needed (CIP 000013, CIP 000015, and Other CIPs), and Authorizing the City Clerk to File a Notice of Completion with the Contra Costa County Clerk Recorder’s Office
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-060

5.5 Resolution No. 2025-061 - Authorizing the Mayor to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Purchasing Agreement with Lincoln Aquatics for the Provision of Aquatic Equipment and Supplies, Increasing the Purchasing Agreement by $150,000 for a Revised Total Cumulative Amount Not to Exceed $550,000 through June 30, 2026
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-061
3 City Council Meeting – June 10, 2025

5.6 Resolution No. 2025-062 - Authorizing the Mayor to Execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement with Miracle Construction Company, Inc., DBA Miracle Playsystems (C2024-054), for an Additional Amount of $25,000 for a Total Cumulative Amount Not to Exceed $224,450 and Extending the Term through June 30, 2026, for the Installation of the Terrace Room Patio Shade Structure as Part of the San Ramon Community Center Renovation Project (CIP 200003) Phase 2 Exterior Renovation Improvements, and Re-Appropriate $25,000 to the San Ramon Community Center Renovation Project (CIP 200003) from the San Ramon Olympic Pool Equipment Replacement Project (CIP 925479) Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-062

5.7 Resolution No. 2025-063 - Authorizing the Mayor to Execute a One-Year Revenue Sharing Agreement for Music Instruction and Programs with James Daly (Dba San Ramon Academy of Music) in an Amount Not to Exceed $145,000 Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-063

5.8 Resolution No. 2025-064 - Authorizing the Mayor to Execute a One-Year Revenue Sharing Agreement for Tennis Instruction with Joyce Bonasera (Dba Bonasera Tennis) with Projected Payments Not to Exceed $360,681 Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-064

5.9 Resolution No. 2025-065 - Authorizing the Mayor to Execute a One-Year Revenue Sharing Agreement for Tennis Instruction with Akshay Arora (Dba Arora Tennis) with Projected Payments Not to Exceed $255,091 Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-065

5.10 Resolution No. 2025-066 - Authorizing the City Manager to Sign Exhibit C – Lease Supplement No. 13 to the San Ramon Library Lease Agreement Between the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County for the Operation of the San Ramon Library and Approve the Amount of $394,331 for July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2026
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-066

5.11 Resolution No. 2025-067 - Authorizing the City Manager to Sign Exhibit a – Lease Supplement No. 6 to the Dougherty Station Library Lease and Services Agreement Between the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County for the Operation of the Dougherty Station Library and Approve an Amount of $77,024.00 for July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2026
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-067

5.12 Resolution No. 2025-068 - Authorizing the Mayor to Execute Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement (C2021-048) with RydeTrans for Senior Citizens’ Transportation Services, Authorizing a Time Extension to June 30, 2026, and Authorizing Additional Funds of $3,898 for a Cumulative Five-Year Total Not to Exceed $201,367
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-068
4 City Council Meeting – June 10, 2025

5.13 Resolution No. 2025-069 - Accepting Offers of Dedication of Parcels A (APN 209-232-008) and B (APN 209-232-009) in Subdivision 4121 Located on Bollinger Canyon Road Near Dos Rios Drive
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-069

5.14 Resolution No. 2025-070 - Approving the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Between the City of San Ramon and Measure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency (TRAFFIX) Program for Administrative Staff Services for a Five-Year Limited Term Assignment Beginning July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2030, Funded by the TRAFFIX Program
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-070

6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

6.1 Proclamation Declaring June 2025 as LGBTQ+ Pride Month. Presentation to Anu Gupta, President of PFLAG Danville/San Ramon Valley.

7. DEFERRED CONSENT ITEMS

8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS

8.1 Public Hearing: Resolution No. 2025-071 - Confirming the Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Diagram and Assessments and Levying the Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Recommendation: Receive the Report, Open the Public Hearing, Take Public Testimony, Close the Public Hearing, Deliberate, and Approve Resolution No. 2025-071
Report by Gary Manuel, Landscape Program Manager

8.2 Public Hearing: Resolution No. 2025-072 - Confirming the Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1984-1 Diagram and Assessments and Levying the Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1984-1 Assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/26
Recommendation: Receive the Report, Open the Public Hearing, Take Public Testimony, Close the Public Hearing, Deliberate, and Approve Resolution No. 2025-072
Report by Gary Manuel, Landscape Program Manager

9. NEW BUSINESS

9.1 Public Hearing: Resolution No. 2025-073 - Repealing and Replacing the Climate Action Plan, in its entirety, as adopted by Resolution No. 2011-094, and Adopting the Updated Climate Action Plan (CAP) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Thresholds and Guidance Report
5 City Council Meeting – June 10, 2025
Recommendation: Staff Recommends the City Council Receive the Staff Report, Accept Public Comment, and Adopt This Resolution (Attachment A) to Adopt the Updated San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP) and the CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds and Guidance Report.

Report by Ryan Driscoll, Associate Planner

10. CITY MANAGER'S AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS' COMMENTS /

MATTERS INITIATED

11. ADJOURNMENT
I hereby certify the agenda was posted 72 hours before the noted meeting. This agenda is posted in accordance with Government Code Section 54954.2(a).

Dated: June 6, 2025
6 City Council Meeting – June 10, 2025
HOW TO VIEW OR PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING:

The public is invited to participate in the meeting using any of the following methods:

IN-PERSON
Members of the public can provide in-person comments at the meeting. To make a request for disability-related accommodation to participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office 48 hours in advance of the meeting.

WRITTEN COMMUNICATION BY EMAIL
Public comments may be submitted via e-mail to [email protected]. Any public comments received up until two (2) hours prior to the scheduled start time of the meeting will be distributed to the City Council via e-mail, provided at the meeting in the red binder, and posted online at https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/public_comment.

Written comments received after the cut-off time will be provided to the City Council the day following the meeting.

Please include “Public Comment” in the subject line. In the body of the email please include your name and the item you wish to comment on. Written public comment will not be read aloud during the meeting.

TO VIEW OR LISTEN ONLY
As a courtesy and technology permitting, the public will have the opportunity to view the meeting via one-way feed by the options below. However, the City cannot guarantee that the public’s remote access to any meeting will be uninterrupted, and technical difficulties may occur from time to time. In those instances, so long as the public may still attend the meeting in person, the meeting will continue. Members of the public desiring to provide comments as a part of the meeting are encouraged to either submit written comments prior to the meeting or to attend the meeting in person.
a. Zoom: https://cityofsanramon.zoom.us/j/91404976108
Webinar ID: 914 0497 6108
b. Zoom Phone Numbers: +1 (669) 900-6833
c. The City’s YouTube Channel: www.sanramon.ca.gov/YouTube Regular City Council meetings are broadcast on Contra Costa Television (CCTV) (Channel 27) on Wednesdays at 7:00 p.m. and Thursdays at 1:00 p.m. immediately following the meeting. Regular City Council meetings are also broadcast on AT&T U-Verse (Channel 99).

ATTENDEE CONDUCT
There will be zero tolerance for any person addressing the Council making profane, offensive and disruptive remarks, or engaging in loud, boisterous, or other disorderly conduct, that disrupts the orderly conduct of the public meeting.

Specifically, it is important for all speakers to adhere to the following guidelines for participation in this meeting:
a. No profanity or obscenity.
b. Refrain from personal threats or attacks.
c. Refrain from hateful epithets and demeaning language based on any person’s race, religion, sexual orientation, ethnicity, gender, or disability.
d. Respect all people that are present or watching.

At the discretion of the Mayor, a speaker may forfeit speaking time for any of the following reasons:
a. Exceeding the allotted time to speak;
b. Yelling, screaming, or other behavior that renders this Council unable to continue the meeting; c. Excessive profanity or slander;
d. Specific threats or “fighting words” that incite violence; or e. Speech that is outside the subject matter jurisdiction of the Council or the specific agenda item in which you are speaking.

While the City of San Ramon ensures the First Amendment rights of its citizens, we do not accept nor endorse any offensive or hateful comments made during our meetings. The City of San Ramon celebrates the diversity of our community, and we strive to be a welcoming and open community for all.

MINUTES OF THE

CITY OF SAN RAMON

CITY COUNCIL MEETING
May 27, 2025

1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL
The Mayor called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m.

Attendee Name Title Status
Mark Armstrong Mayor Present
Sridhar Verose Vice Mayor Present
Richard Adler Councilmember Present
Robert Jweinat Councilmember Present
Marisol Rubio Councilmember Present
Also in attendance: City Manager Steven Spedowfski, City Attorney Martin Lysons, City Clerk Christina Franco, Finance Director Jennifer Wakeman, and Recreation Supervisor Jessica Reaber.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. ANNOUNCEMENTS

3.1 Changes and Additions to the Agenda

3.2 If you wish to speak under Public Comment or regarding an agenda item please fill out a speaker card located in the back of the room and submit it to the City Clerk.

4. PUBLIC COMMENT
Public comment was received from Jim Blickenstaff, Santhosh Kanjula, Maanyata Srikantam, Vasanth Shetty, Chirag Kathrani, Ravi Hoskote, Yohannes Tilahun, and Lokesh Shamanna.

5. CONSENT CALENDAR
Vice Mayor Verose's motion to approve consent calendar items 5.1-5.11 was seconded by Cm. Rubio. The motion passed 5-0-0-0.

RESULT: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Sridhar Verose, Vice Mayor
SECONDER: Marisol Rubio, Councilmember
AYES: Armstrong, Verose, Adler, Jweinat, Rubio

5.1 Minutes of the City Council Regular Meeting - May 13, 2025 Recommendation: Approve Minutes

5.2 Register of Demands for the Period Ending April 30, 2025 Recommendation: Approve Register of Demands

5.1 Packet Pg. 8
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of May 27, 2025 7:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 2 City Council Meeting – May 27, 2025

5.3 Resolution No. 2025-049 - Adopting a List of Projects for FY 2025/26 Funded by Senate Bill 1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-049

5.4 Resolution No. 2025-050 - Approving the Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26, Adopting a Resolution of Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments for FY 2025/26, and Setting a Public Hearing for June 10, 2025
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-050

5.5 Resolution No. 2025-051 - Approving the Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26, Adopting a Resolution of Intention to Levy and Collect Assessments for FY 2025/26, and Setting a Public Hearing for June 10, 2025
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-051

5.6 Resolution No. 2025-052 - Approving the Display of the Progress Pride Flag Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-052

5.7 Resolution No. 2025-053 - Adopting Findings to Appropriate Funds in the Child Care, Private Sector Arts and Beautification Contribution (City Beautification), Creek Mitigation, Drainage Mitigation, Geographic Information System (GIS) Mapping, Park Development, and Traffic Improvement Funds, for the Period Ending June 30, 2024
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-053

5.8 Resolution No. 2025-054 - Establishing the Annual Gann Appropriations Limit for the Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2014-1 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-054

5.9 Resolution No. 2025-055 - Authorizing the Mayor to Execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement (C2022-026) with Livermore Pleasanton Umpires Association for Athletic Officials for Adult Softball Programs for Additional Funds Not to Exceed $47,085 for a Cumulative Contract Amount Not to Exceed $126,750 and Extending the Agreement to June 30, 2026.

Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-055

5.10 Resolution No. 2025-056 - Authorizing the Mayor to Execute an Agreement with VSS International, Inc. for Construction of the Pavement Management 2025 Project (CIP 000015) in an Amount Not to Exceed $2,065,000 Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-056

5.11 Resolution No. 2025-057 - Authorizing the Mayor to Execute an Agreement with Casey Printing for the Printing of the Recreation Guide in a Total Cumulative Five-Year Amount Not to Exceed $243,343
Recommendation: Approve Resolution Nos. 2025-057

5.1 Packet Pg. 9
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of May 27, 2025 7:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 3 City Council Meeting – May 27, 2025
Resolution No. 2025-058 - Authorizing the Mayor to Execute an Agreement with Folger Graphics for the Printing of the Encore Newsletter, Quarterly Newsletter, and Annual Report, in a Total Cumulative Five-Year Amount Not to Exceed $200,732
Recommendation: Approve Resolution Nos. 2025-057 and 2025-058

6. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

7. DEFERRED CONSENT ITEMS

8. UNFINISHED BUSINESS

8.1 Resolution No. 2025-059 - Adopting the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Operating and Capital Budget, Establishing an Appropriations Limit, and Authorizing Carryover Project Appropriations
Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2025-059
Presentation by Jennifer Wakeman, Finance Director.

Public comment was received from Vasanth Shetty.

Vice Mayor Verose's motion to approve Resolution No. 2025-059 adopting the fiscal year 2025-26 operating and capital budget, establishing an appropriation limit, and authorizing carryover project appropriations, was seconded by Cm. Adler. The motion passed 5-0-0-0.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Sridhar Verose, Vice Mayor
SECONDER: Richard Adler, Councilmember
AYES: Armstrong, Verose, Adler, Jweinat, Rubio

9. NEW BUSINESS

9.1 Teen Council Annual Report
Introduction by Jessica Reaber, Recreation Supervisor. Presentation by Tanishka Chawla, Teen Council Chair.

Public comment was received from Garry Chaban.

The City Council did not take any action on this item.

9.2 Consideration Of, and Direction to Staff Regarding the Interview Process and Applicants to Interview for the Planning Commission
Staff Report by Christina Franco, City Clerk
The City Council provided direction to staff.

5.1 Packet Pg. 10
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of May 27, 2025 7:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR) 4 City Council Meeting – May 27, 2025

9.3 Consideration Of, and Direction to Staff Regarding the Interview Process and Applicants to Interview for the Parks and Community Services Commission Staff Report by Christina Franco, City Clerk
Public comment was received from Yohannes Tilahun and Santhosh Kanjula.

The City Council provided direction to staff.

10. CITY MANAGER'S AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS' COMMENTS /

MATTERS INITIATED

11. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Armstrong adjourned the meeting at 9:53 p.m.

5.1 Packet Pg. 11
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of May 27, 2025 7:00 PM (CONSENT CALENDAR)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 2025
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Christina Franco, City Clerk
By: Christina Franco, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Confirming San Ramon Representative Appointment to the Contra Costa County Mosquito & Vector Control District Board of Trustees

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council review the application and reappoint Peter Pay as the City’s representative to the Contra Costa County Mosquito and Vector Control District Board of Trustees for a four year term to expire June 2029.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The primary purpose of the Contra Costa Mosquito and Vector Control District Board is to provide County-wide public health service through the control of mosquitoes, rats, skunks, yellow jackets, and other vectors.

The Board of Trustees meet bimonthly on the second Monday of every other month at 7:00 p.m. at the district office in Concord.

The City Clerk’s Office listed the vacancy on the City’s website and social media accounts soliciting applications. One application was received from the incumbent Peter Pay by the May 21, 2025 deadline.

Mr. Pay has served as San Ramon’s representative to the Board of Trustee since 2017, and in January was elected as President of the Board for 2025. Mr. Pay’s current term expires in June 2025.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
None.

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Should the City Council elect to reappoint the applicant, staff will notify the applicant and the Contra Costa County Mosquito and Vector Control District of the reappointment.

5.2 Packet Pg. 12

ATTACHMENT
Application

5.2 Packet Pg. 13

5.2.a
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: Application (2025-26 : CCC Mosquito & Vector Control District Appointment)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 2025
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Christina Franco, City Clerk
By: Christina Franco, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Confirming the San Ramon Representative Appointment to the County Connection Advisory Committee

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council review the application and appoint Ivan Fedorenko as the City’s representative to County Connection Advisory Committee for a two year term to expire June 2027.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The primary purpose of the County Connection Advisory Committee is to review, analyze, and advise the County Connection Board of Directors on issues and policies relating to fixed-route and paratransit service. There is currently a vacancy for a representative from the City of San Ramon.

The County Connection Advisory Committee meets monthly on the first Thursday at 1:30 p.m. at the County Connection office in Concord.

The Clerk's Office listed the vacancy on the City’s website and social media accounts solicitating applications. One application was received from Mr. Fedorenko by the May 21, 2025 deadline.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
None.

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Should the City Council elect to appoint the applicant, staff will notify the applicant and County Connection of the appointment.

ATTACHMENT
Application

5.3 Packet Pg. 15
ϭ͘ EĂŵĞ͗
Ϯ͘ ĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗ ŝƉ ŽĚĞ͗
ϯ͘ dĞůĞƉŚŽŶĞ͗ ,ŽŵĞ͗ ƵƐŝŶĞƐƐ͗ Ğůů͗
ϰ͘
ϱ͘ KĐĐƵƉĂƚŝŽŶ͗
ϲ͘
ĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗
ŽŶƚƌĂ ŽƐƚĂ ŽƵŶƚǇ ĚǀŝƐŽƌǇ ŽƵŶĐŝů ŽŶ ŐŝŶŐ
ŽŶƚƌĂ ŽƐƚĂ ŽƵŶƚǇ >ŝďƌĂƌǇ ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ
ŽŶƚƌĂ ŽƐƚĂ ŽƵŶƚǇ DŽƐƋƵŝƚŽ ĂŶĚ sĞĐƚŽƌ ŽŶƚƌŽů ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ ŽŶƚƌĂ ŽƐƚĂ ŽƵŶƚǇ dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ ƵƚŚŽƌŝƚǇ Ͳ ŝƚŝǌĞŶƐ ĚǀŝƐŽƌǇ ŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞ entral Contra Costa dƌĂŶƐit ƵƚŚŽƌŝƚǇ Ͳ ŽƵŶƚǇ ŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶ ŽŶƚƌĂ ŽƐƚĂ ŽƵŶƚǇ dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ ƵƚŚŽƌŝƚǇ Ͳ ĐĐĞƐƐ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ WůĞĂƐĞ ĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞ ǇŽƵƌ ƌĞůĂƚĞĚ ũŽď ĂŶĚͬŽƌ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇ ĞǆƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞ͗ ,Žǁ ůŽŶŐ ŚĂǀĞ ǇŽƵ ůŝǀĞĚ ǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞ ^ĂŶ ZĂŵŽŶ ĐŝƚǇ ůŝŵŝƚƐ͍ ^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ͗ ĂƚĞĚ͗
/Ĩ ǇŽƵ ĂƌĞ Ă ŵĞŵďĞƌ ŽĨ Ă ŽƵŶƚǇ ŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ Žƌ ŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞ ǇŽƵ ĂƌĞ ŶŽƚ ĞůŝŐŝďůĞ ƚŽ ƐĞƌǀĞ ĐŽŶĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇ ŽŶ ĂŶŽƚŚĞƌ ĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞ͘ tŚĂƚ ĚŽ ǇŽƵ ĨĞĞů ŝƐ ƚŚĞ ŵŽƐƚ ŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚ ĐŽŶƚƌŝďƵƚŝŽŶ ǇŽƵ ĐĂŶ ŵĂŬĞ ĂƐ Ă ŵĞŵďĞƌ ŽĨ ƚŚŝƐ ĐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞ͗ /dz >
Z<͕ /dz K& ^E ZDKE͕ ϳϬϬϬ K>>/E'
Z EzKE Z͕ ^E ZDKE͕ ϵϰϱϴϯ
W,KE
͗ ;ϵϮϱͿ ϵϳϯͲϮϱϯϵ &y͗ ;ϵϮϱͿ ϮϳϱͲϬϲϱϬ
D/>͗ /dz>
Z<Λ^EZDKE͘͘'Ks

ͲŵĂŝů ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐ͗
/ ǁŽƵůĚ ůŝŬĞ ƚŽ ďĞ ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚ ĨŽƌ ĂƉƉŽŝŶƚŵĞŶƚ ƚŽ ƚŚĞ ĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐ͗ ;WůĞĂƐĞ ĐŚĞĐŬ ƉƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƐͿ͘ /dz K& ^E ZDKE
ƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ ƚŽ ƐĞƌǀĞ ĂƐ ƚŚĞ ^ĂŶ ZĂŵŽŶ ZĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞ ŽŶ Ă KhEdz s/^KZz KZ͕ KDD/^^/KE͕ KDD/dd

Ivan Fedorenko
San Ramon 94582
na na
Assistant Professor of Marketing, California State University East Bay PhD in Business, Bentley University;
v
With my experience in Marketing and a professional background in customer analytics, I bring an ability to advise on public transit from a user-centric perspective.

My most important contribution to the County Connection Advisory Committee would be offering informed, community-rooted recommendations that help improve the quality, accessibility, and effectiveness of fixed-route and paratransit services in San Ramon and the county while acting as a strong liaison between the San Ramon community and the transit agency.

As a parent of a middle-school and high-school-aged kids I also bring a firsthand knowledge of issues related to school commute including County Connection school-centered routes (35/335, 622/623, 635/636, etc) I currently serve on the San Ramon Transportation Advisory Committee, where I review and advise on transportation initiatives involving the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA), County Connection, and the Tri-Valley Transportation Council (TVTC).

I’ve contributed to projects such as the San Ramon Bicycle Master Plan update and the Iron Horse Trail Overcrossing.

Professionally, I am an Professor of Marketing at California State University East Bay, specializing in digital marketing analytics and customer experience research.

I also serve as a consultant with the East Bay Small Business Development Center (SBDC), supporting local economic development in Contra Costa and Alameda Counties. My prior industry experience includes strategic planning and analytics in the logistics and transportation sector This blend of academic and industry experience positions me to contribute meaningfully to improving transit service for County Connection. 6 years, since 2019
Ivan Fedorenko Digitally signed by Ivan Fedorenko
Date: 2025.05.20 10:56:05 -07'00' 5/20/2025

5.3.a
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: Application (2025-27 : County Connection Advisory Committee)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 2025
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Brian Bornstein, Public Works Director
By: Suzy Edwards, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-060 - Accepting the Work by Sposeto Engineering, Inc. for Curb Ramp Construction and Miscellaneous Concrete Repairs for Pavement Management 2024 and 2025 Projects and Other Curb Ramp Locations As-Needed (CIP 000013, CIP 000015, and Other CIPs), and Authorizing the City Clerk to File a Notice of Completion with the Contra Costa County Clerk Recorder’s Office

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On March 26, 2024, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-039, authorizing a construction agreement (C2024-028) with Sposeto Engineering, Inc. for Curb Ramp Construction and Miscellaneous Concrete Repairs for the Pavement Management 2024 and 2025 Projects and Other Curb Ramp Locations As-Needed (CIP 000013, CIP 000015, and other CIPs), including contingencies in an amount not to exceed $945,000. On January 1, 2025, City executed Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement. extending the Agreement to June 30, 2025. All other terms and conditions of the original Agreement remained. Sposeto Engineering, Inc. has completed the work within the time specified in the contract documents and within the authorized budget amount.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends approval of this Resolution, accepting the work by Sposeto Engineering, Inc. for Curb Ramp Construction and Miscellaneous Concrete Repairs for the Pavement Management 2024 and 2025 Projects and Other Curb Ramp Locations As-Needed (CIP 000013, CIP 000015, and other CIPs), as complete and authorizing the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Contra Costa County Clerk Recorder's Office (Attachment A).

BACKGROUND
The Pavement Management Program (PMP) was developed as part of a Citywide Program to provide street maintenance on an annual basis. By performing this maintenance frequently and systematically, the City minimizes long-term maintenance costs associated with complete reconstruction of failed pavement and maintains a higher quality throughout the life of the

5.4 Packet Pg. 17
pavement. Two recent projects included in the City’s PMP were the Pavement Management 2024 Project (CIP 000013) and Pavement Management 2025 Project (CIP 000015).

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Compliance
In 2013, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Department of Transportation (DOT) issued ADA requirements to provide or upgrade curb ramps when streets, roads, or highways are altered through resurfacing. The two projects, Pavement Management 2024 Project (CIP 000013) and Pavement Management 2025 Project (CIP 000015), triggered upgrades of approximately 70 curb ramps.

Cost Saving Strategies
In 2018, staff began implementing new strategies to improve cost-effectiveness in the Pavement Management Program. One of these strategies was to combine all required ADA curb ramps for pavement projects into a single concrete construction and repair contract and to obtain better unit costs by an economy of scale. In line with this strategy, on March 26, 2024, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-039 authorizing a construction Agreement (C2024-028) with Sposeto Engineering, Inc. for Curb Ramp Construction and Miscellaneous Concrete Repairs for the Pavement Management 2024 and 2025 Projects and Other Curb Ramp Locations As-Needed (CIP 000013, CIP 000015, and other CIPs), including contingencies in an amount not to exceed $945,000. On January 1, 2025, City executed Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement, extending the Agreement to June 30, 2025. All other terms and conditions of the original Agreement remained.

DISCUSSION
The contractor completed the work within the time specified in the contract documents and within the authorized budget amount. Acceptance of the Project will initiate the 30-day Stop Notice period after the recording of the Notice of Completion, as required by law.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
The total authorized amount for the Construction Agreement (C2024-028) with Sposeto Engineering, Inc. was $945,000. The total expenses by Project for this contract are as follows:

Project Funding Source Amount
Pavement Management 2024 Project - CIP 000013 $559,073
Pavement Management 2025 Project - CIP 000015 $206,689
Total $765,762

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
The City Clerk will file a Notice of Completion with the Contra Costa County Clerk Recorder’s

5.4 Packet Pg. 18
Office. Upon completion of the posting period, the City will release the contract retention funds.

ATTACHMENT
A - Notice of Completion

5.4 Packet Pg. 19
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-060

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON ACCEPTING THE WORK BY SPOSETO ENGINEERING, INC. FOR CURB RAMP

CONSTRUCTION AND MISCELLANEOUS CONCRETE REPAIRS FOR PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 2024 AND 2025 PROJECTS AND OTHER CURB RAMP LOCATIONS AS-NEEDED (CIP 000013, CIP 000015, AND OTHER CIPS), AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY CLERK TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION WITH THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLERK RECORDER’S OFFICE
WHEREAS, the City desired to perform curb ramp construction and miscellaneous concrete repairs for the Pavement Management 2024 and 2025 Projects and other Curb Ramp Locations as needed (CIP 000013, CIP 000015, and other CIPs; and WHEREAS, on March 26, 2024, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-039, authorizing a Construction Agreement (C2024-028) with Sposeto Engineering, Inc. for Curb Ramp Construction and Miscellaneous Concrete Repairs for the Pavement Management 2024 and 2025 Projects and Other Curb Ramp Locations As-Needed (CIP 000013, CIP 000015, and other CIP Projects), including contingencies in an amount not to exceed $945,000; and WHEREAS, on January 1, 2025, City issued Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (C2024-028) extending the contract term through June 30, 2025; and WHEREAS, the total construction cost of the Curb Ramp Construction and Miscellaneous Concrete Repairs for the Pavement Management 2024 and 2025 Projects and Other Curb Ramp Locations As-Needed (CIP 000013, CIP 000015, and other CIPs) by Sposeto Engineering, Inc. is $765,762; and
WHEREAS, the work performed by Sposeto Engineering, Inc. for Curb Ramp Construction and Miscellaneous Concrete Repairs for the Pavement Management 2024 and 2025 Projects and Other Curb Ramp Locations As-Needed (CIP 000013, CIP 000015, and other CIPs) is now complete and ready for acceptance by City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED the City accepts the work by Sposeto Engineering, Inc. for Curb Ramp Construction and Miscellaneous Concrete Repairs for the Pavement Management 2024 and 2025 Projects and Other Curb Ramp Locations As-Needed (CIP 000013, CIP 000015, and other CIPs) as complete and authorizes the City Clerk to File a Notice of Completion with the Contra Costa County Clerk Recorder's Office.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the meeting of June 10, 2025 by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

5.4 Packet Pg. 20
ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________
Mark Armstrong, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Christina Franco, City Clerk

5.4 Packet Pg. 21
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

City of San Ramon
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:

City Clerk-City of San Ramon
7000 Bollinger Canyon Road
San Ramon, CA 94583

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the City of San Ramon, a charter city in the County of Contra Costa, State of California, that it:

1. The nature of the City of San Ramon’s interest in the project is fee ownership.

Owner: City of San Ramon, 7000 Bollinger Canyon Road, San Ramon, CA 94583

2. Entered into a written contract with:

Sposeto Engineering, Inc.
4558 Contractors Place
Livermore, CA 94551
May 16, 2024
(Contract Date)

3. Brief Description of the Project:

The work performed by Sposeto Engineering, Inc. under the Pavement Management 2024 and 2025, included curb ramp construction upgrades, and miscellaneous concrete repairs to sidewalk, curb, gutter, and valley gutters within the limits of the two Projects.

4. Said work was completed and accepted by the San Ramon City Council on:

June 10, 2025*

5. The surety on said contract was held by:

Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
1277 Treat Blvd., Suite 650
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
PB03135700351
(Bond No.)
I HEREBY CERTIFY, under penalty of perjury, that the facts set forth in the foregoing Notice of Completion are true and correct.

Dated:

Christina Franco, City Clerk
City of San Ramon
*Date must be within 10 days of recording notice.

5.4.a
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: A - Notice of Completion (2025-060 : Accepting Work by Sposeto Engineering)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 2025
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Brian Bornstein, Public Works Director
By: Mike Dodds, Program Manager
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-061 - Authorizing the Mayor to Execute Amendment No. 1 to the Purchasing Agreement with Lincoln Aquatics for the Provision of Aquatic Equipment and Supplies, Increasing the Purchasing Agreement by $150,000 for a Revised Total Cumulative Amount Not to Exceed $550,000 through June 30, 2026

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On May 11, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-062 authorizing approval of purchases with Lincoln Aquatics (Lincoln) for the provision of aquatic equipment and supplies for a total cumulative five-year amount not to exceed $400,000. The current Purchasing Agreement is set to expire on June 30, 2026. To date, $387,435 has been spent under the authorized amount. Due to rising costs and the need to replace equipment at the Aquatic Centers, additional funding is necessary. Staff recommend amending the current Purchasing Agreement to increase the not-to-exceed amount by $150,000, for a revised total of $550,000 through June 30, 2026.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends approval of this Resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Purchasing Agreement with Lincoln Aquatics for the provision of aquatic equipment and supplies, increasing the Purchasing Agreement by $150,000 for a revised total cumulative amount not to exceed $550,000 through June 30, 2026.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The City of San Ramon currently operates two Aquatic Centers, four display fountains, and two splash pad facilities. In order to ensure that these facilities remain open and safe for patrons to enjoy, they require ongoing maintenance, repair, and renovation. To complete these tasks, equipment and supplies must be purchased both routinely and, at times, on an emergency basis.

These include water treatment equipment and supplies, deck equipment, heaters and heater parts, pumps, motors, filters, and lane lines. The Aquatic Centers also require equipment for the programs offered at each site, which are purchased by the City’s Parks and Community Services Department. Program equipment may include required legal signage, backboards, paddle boards, lifeguard supplies, and training equipment.

5.5 Packet Pg. 23
Lincoln is not only the largest supplier of aquatic equipment and supplies, but also the sole vendor in the greater San Francisco Bay Area currently offering Prominent Chemical Controllers. These controllers are used by the City to treat the water in all three pools at the San Ramon Olympic Pool and Aquatic Park (SROP). Additionally, Lincoln is a local company capable of making emergency deliveries of parts and equipment when needed. Their staff is familiar with the City’s facilities and systems, which enhances the efficiency of delivering parts and supplies.

As a result of past repairs and replacements, including dive stands, pool covers, lifeguard chairs, ADA lifts, and other pool equipment, the City has expended $387,435 of the $400,000 Purchasing Agreement amount.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
To date, the City has expended $387,435 under the Purchasing Agreement with Lincoln Aquatics, leaving approximately $12,565 remaining through June 30, 2026. The expenditures are attributed to upgrades, equipment replacements, and emergency repairs.

The proposed FY 2025/26 Operating and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget includes approximately $112,000 for routine maintenance and CIP projects. The remaining amount of $12,566 is insufficient to provide for equipment replacements and unforeseen repairs in the event of unit failures through the end of FY 2025/26. Therefore, staff recommend amending the current Purchasing Agreement to increase the Purchasing Agreement amount by $150,000, for a total cumulative amount not to exceed $550,000 through June 30, 2026. An extension to the Purchasing Agreement is not being requested with the proposed Amendment, as staff is scheduled to prepare a Request for Qualifications for FY 2026/27. Funding for the proposed Amendment will be considered as part of the City’s Operating and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget development process. If approved, funding will be appropriated from a combination of sources, including the General Fund, the Dougherty Valley CSA Fund, and the Infrastructure Maintenance Fund, as appropriate and authorized.

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
The City will issue and forward Purchase Orders to Lincoln Aquatics, as needed, for aquatic equipment and supplies.

5.5 Packet Pg. 24
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-061

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE

PURCHASING AGREEMENT WITH LINCOLN AQUATICS FOR THE PROVISION

OF AQUATIC EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES, INCREASING THE PURCHASING AGREEMENT BY $150,000 FOR A REVISED TOTAL CUMULATIVE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $550,000 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026
WHEREAS, the City of San Ramon has a need for a qualified vendor to supply and deliver aquatic equipment and supplies for its two Aquatic Centers, four display fountains, and two splash pad facilities; and
WHEREAS, on May 11, 2021, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-062 authorizing a Purchasing Agreement with Lincoln Aquatics for the provision of aquatic Equipment and supplies for a total cumulative five-year amount not to exceed $400,00 as a result of a competitive Request for Qualifications process; and WHEREAS, Lincoln Aquatics has proven to be an excellent source of aquatic equipment and supplies; and
WHEREAS, Lincoln Aquatics is the sole vendor in the greater San Francisco Bay Area currently offering Prominent Chemical Controllers; and
WHEREAS, as a result of past repairs and replacements including dive stands, pool covers, lifeguard chairs, ADA lifts, and other pool equipment, the City has expended $387,435 of the $400,000 Purchasing Agreement amount; and
WHEREAS, to continue to provide for equipment replacements and emergency repairs through FY 2025/26, an amendment to the current Purchasing Agreement is necessary to increase the contract amount by $150,000; and
WHEREAS, an extension to the Purchasing Agreement is not being requested with the proposed amendment, as staff is scheduled to prepare a Request for Qualifications in FY 2026/27; and
WHEREAS, funding for the Purchasing Agreement will be considered as part of the City’s Operating and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget development process, and funding will be appropriated from a combination of sources, including the General Fund, the Dougherty Valley County Service Area (CSA) Fund, and the Infrastructure Maintenance Fund, as appropriate and authorized.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Ramon does hereby authorize the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Purchasing Agreement with Lincoln Aquatics for the provision of aquatic equipment and supplies,

5.5 Packet Pg. 25
increasing the Purchasing Agreement by $150,000 for a revised total cumulative amount not to exceed $550,000 through June 30, 2026.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the meeting of June 10, 2025, by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________
Mark Armstrong, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Christina Franco, City Clerk

5.5 Packet Pg. 26

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 2025
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Brian Bornstein, Public Works Director
By: Mike Dodds, Program Manager
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-062 - Authorizing the Mayor to Execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement with Miracle Construction Company, Inc., DBA Miracle Playsystems (C2024-054), for an Additional Amount of $25,000 for a Total Cumulative Amount Not to Exceed $224,450 and Extending the Term through June 30, 2026, for the Installation of the Terrace Room Patio Shade Structure as Part of the San Ramon Community Center Renovation Project (CIP 200003) Phase 2 Exterior Renovation Improvements, and Re-Appropriate $25,000 to the San Ramon Community Center Renovation Project (CIP 200003) from the San Ramon Olympic Pool Equipment Replacement Project (CIP 925479)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On January 14, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-002 authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 with Miracle Construction Company, Inc., DBA Miracle Playsystems (Miracle), for the installation of the Terrace Room Patio shade structure as part of the San Ramon Community Center (SRCC) Renovation Project (CIP 200003) Phase 2 Exterior Renovation Improvements in an amount not to exceed $199,450 through June 30, 2025.

Requests for additional information from the Plans Examiner have delayed the project’s start, while anticipated special inspections and potential material price increases have increased the Project’s overall cost. An extension to the Agreement and additional funding are necessary to complete the installation of the Terrace Room Patio shade structure. Proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement with Miracle includes an additional $25,000, bringing the total cumulative amount to not exceed $224,450, and extends the term through June 30, 2026. The Resolution also includes a reappropriation of $25,000 to the SRCC Renovation Project (CIP 200003) from the San Ramon Olympic Pool (SROP) Equipment Replacement Project (CIP 925479).

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends approval of this Resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement with Miracle Construction Company, Inc., DBA Miracle Playsystems (C2024-054), for an additional amount of $25,000 for a total cumulative amount not to exceed $224,450 and extending the term through June 30, 2026, for the installation of the Terrace Room

5.6 Packet Pg. 27
Patio shade structure as part of the San Ramon Community Center Renovation Project (CIP 200003) Phase 2 Exterior Renovation Improvements, and reappropriate $25,000 to the San Ramon Community Center Renovation Project (CIP 200003) from the San Ramon Olympic Pool Equipment Replacement Project (CIP 925479).

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
At the Infrastructure Committee Meeting on October 30, 2023, staff received feedback on a reconfigured shade structure design that meets building code requirements, maximizes patio coverage, and minimizes roof debris accumulation. In addition, lighting will be installed on the structure upon project completion.

On February 27, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-023 authorizing the Mayor to execute an Agreement with Miracle for the installation of the Terrace Room Patio shade structure as part of the SRCC Renovation Project (CIP 200003) Phase 2 Exterior Renovation Improvements in an amount not to exceed $199,450 through December 31, 2024, and appropriated $68,202 from the Infrastructure Maintenance Fund (618) to the SRCC Renovation Project (CIP 200003).

On January 14, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-002 authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 with Miracle for the installation of the Terrace Room Patio shade structure as part of the SRCC Renovation Project (CIP 200003) Phase 2 Exterior Renovation Improvements in an amount not to exceed $199,450 through June 30, 2025.

Requests for additional information from the Plans Examiner have extended the project timeline.

The requested details included longitudinal and transverse reinforcement specifications, a statement of compliance, and clarification of footing design. Once the plans are approved, parts will be ordered and manufactured, which is expected to take approximately eight weeks.

Installation will then be scheduled, with construction anticipated to take about four weeks. To avoid disrupting Summer Camps that use the Terrace Room Patio for check-in, installation will be postponed until after camp activities conclude on August 8, 2025, when the area becomes available for construction.

The cost of special inspections for concrete, bolt installation, and caissons has been added to the Project. These costs, along with potential increases in material prices, have contributed to the overall Project cost increase.

Amendment No. 2 with Miracle will add $25,000 for a total cumulative amount not to exceed $224,450 and extend the term through June 30, 2026, for the installation of the Terrace Room Patio shade structure. The Resolution also includes a reappropriation of $25,000 to the SRCC Renovation Project (CIP 200003) from the SROP Equipment Replacement Project (CIP 925479).

FISCAL ANALYSIS

5.6 Packet Pg. 28
Due to special inspections and the potential for cost increases, an additional contingency is needed. We are requesting funding for the Terrace Room Patio shade structure through a reappropriation of $25,000 from the SROP Equipment Replacement Project (CIP 925479). The SROP Equipment Replacement Project (CIP 925479) has sufficient funds to accommodate this reappropriation and complete the necessary work identified in the CIP.

SROP Equipment Replacement Project Available Balance $429,387 Transfer to CIP 200003 -$25,000
Remaining funds CIP 925479 $404,387

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL

1. The City Attorney’s Office will forward Amendment No. 2 to Miracle Construction Company, Inc., DBA Miracle Playsystems (C2024 -054) for execution.

2. Upon receipt of the executed contract documents, the required bonds and certificates of insurance from the contractor, the City Attorney’s Office will send a copy of the executed contract documents and all attachments to the Public Works Department.

3. A revised Notice to Proceed will be provided to the contractor and staff will pursue the work to completion.

5.6 Packet Pg. 29
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-062

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE AGREEMENT WITH MIRACLE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., DBA MIRACLE PLAYSYSTEMS (C2024-054), FOR AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $25,000 FOR A TOTAL CUMULATIVE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $224,450 AND EXTENDING THE TERM THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026, FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE

TERRACE ROOM PATIO SHADE STRUCTURE AS PART OF THE SAN RAMON COMMUNITY CENTER RENOVATION PROJECT (CIP 200003) PHASE 2 EXTERIOR RENOVATION IMPROVEMENTS, AND RE-APPROPRIATE $25,000 TO THE SAN RAMON COMMUNITY CENTER RENOVATION PROJECT (CIP 200003) FROM THE

SAN RAMON OLYMPIC POOL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROJECT (CIP 925479)
WHEREAS, on October 30, 2023, staff received feedback from the Infrastructure Committee on a reconfigured shade structure design that complies with building code requirements, maximizes patio coverage, and minimizes debris accumulation on the roof, and the installation of lighting after the shade structure installation is complete; and WHEREAS, on February 27, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-023 authorizing the Mayor to execute an Agreement with Miracle Construction Company, Inc., DBA Miracle Playsystems (Miracle), for the installation of the Terrace Room Patio shade structure, as part of the San Ramon Community Center Renovation Project (CIP 200003) Phase 2 Exterior Renovation Improvements in an amount not to exceed $199,450 through December 31, 2024, and appropriated $68,202 from the Infrastructure Maintenance Fund (618) to the San Ramon Community Center Renovation Project (CIP 200003); and
WHEREAS, on January 14, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-002 authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 with Miracle for the installation of the Terrace Room Patio shade structure as part of the San Ramon Community Center Renovation Project (CIP 200003) Phase 2 Exterior Renovation Improvements in an amount not to exceed $199,450 through June 30, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City received design and engineering calculations for the structure and submitted them to the Community Development Department for review; and WHEREAS, additional information requested by the Plans Examiner has caused the Project to be extended, along with scheduling conflicts at the San Ramon Community Center; and
WHEREAS, the cost of special inspections for concrete, bolt installation, and caissons, along with potential increases in material prices, have contributed to the overall Project cost increase; and

5.6 Packet Pg. 30
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 will include an additional amount of $25,000 for a total cumulative amount not to exceed $224,450; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 will extend the project timeline to June 30, 2026; and WHEREAS, in order to provide additional funding, a reappropriation of $25,000 to the San Ramon Community Center Renovation Project (CIP 200003) from the San Ramon Olympic Pool Equipment Replacement Project (CIP 925479) is requested.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Ramon does hereby authorize the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement with Miracle Construction Company, Inc., DBA Miracle Playsystems (C2024-054), for an additional amount of $25,000 for a total cumulative amount not to exceed $224,450 and extending the term through June 30, 2026, for the installation of the Terrace Room Patio shade structure as part of the San Ramon Community Center Renovation Project (CIP 200003) Phase 2 Exterior Renovation Improvements, and Reappropriate $25,000 to the San Ramon Community Center Renovation Project (CIP 200003) from the San Ramon Olympic Pool Equipment Replacement Project (CIP 925479).

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the meeting of June 10, 2025 by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________
Mark Armstrong, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Christina Franco, City Clerk

5.6 Packet Pg. 31

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 2025
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Scott Koll, Assistant City Manager
By: Mae Mlyniec, Administrative Analyst
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-063 - Authorizing the Mayor to Execute a OneYear Revenue Sharing Agreement for Music Instruction and Programs with James Daly (Dba San Ramon Academy of Music) in an Amount Not to Exceed $145,000

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends adoption of this Resolution, authorizing the Mayor to execute a one-year revenue sharing agreement for Music Instruction and Programs with James Daly (dba San Ramon Academy of Music) with projected payments not to exceed $145,000.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The City began offering music instruction classes with instructor, James Daly (dba San Ramon Academy of Music), in 2021. The program has been very successful and continues to generate high rates of participation. Based on the positive track record and evaluations from participants, the Parks and Community Services Department wishes to continue to contract with San Ramon Academy of Music for the 2025-26 year.

Resolution No. 2025-036 (Fee Resolution) authorizes the Parks and Community Services Department to charge fees for participation in classes, programs, activities, and events based on:
● Comparable fees in other cities, recreation districts, and colleges ● Session length and length of class time per meeting
● Revenue sharing agreements with contracted instructors ● The cost to the City for providing such services
● City Council direction on recovered costs
● Discounts offered as incentives to increase program participation, facility rentals, and revenues
● An available scholarship program to address the needs of residents who may not be able to afford programs
● The value and benefit of such services to the San Ramon Community Fees are collected for the classes and split with the contractors on a percentage basis. Currently, the revenue split is 60% San Ramon Academy of Music, 40% City.

5.7 Packet Pg. 32

FISCAL ANALYSIS
Due to the continuing growth of these programs, the annual contracted payments are expected to exceed the $100,000 annual limit for City Manager authorization and therefore, require approval of the City Council on an annual basis. The FY 2025/26 Parks and Community Services Department’s budget continues to exclude expenditures related to instructor contract services due to the accounting methodology, which only shows net revenue for the instructor contract services in the budget. All instructor contract payments will be paid from the corresponding revenue account. Should the instructors’ projected earnings exceed the forecasted amount, revenues collected serve to offset such increased earnings.

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Staff will prepare an annual contract for this instructor per the established Purchasing and Procurement Policy.

5.7 Packet Pg. 33
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-063

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON

AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A ONE-YEAR REVENUE SHARING

AGREEMENT FOR MUSIC INSTRUCTION AND PROGRAMS WITH JAMES DALY (DBA SAN RAMON ACADEMY OF MUSIC) IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $145,000
WHEREAS, the City of San Ramon’s Parks and Community Services Department offers classes and programs through revenue sharing agreements with contracted instructors; and WHEREAS, The City of San Ramon’s purchasing policy requires City Council approval for any expenditures in an amount exceeding $100,000 annually; and WHEREAS, James Daly (dba San Ramon Academy of Music) currently provides classes for the City; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Community Services approved 2025-26 Annual Budget includes the funds for this agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Ramon does hereby authorize the Mayor to execute a one-year revenue sharing agreement for music instruction and programs with James Daly in an amount not to exceed $145,000.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the meeting of June 10, 2025 by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________
Mark Armstrong, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Christina Franco, City Clerk

5.7 Packet Pg. 34

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 2025
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Scott Koll, Assistant City Manager
By: Mae Mlyniec, Administrative Analyst
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-064 - Authorizing the Mayor to Execute a OneYear Revenue Sharing Agreement for Tennis Instruction with Joyce Bonasera (Dba Bonasera Tennis) with Projected Payments Not to Exceed $360,681

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends adoption of this Resolution, authorizing the Mayor to execute a one-year revenue sharing agreement for Tennis Instruction with Joyce Bonasera (dba Bonasera Tennis) with projected payments not to exceed $360,681.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The City began offering tennis classes with instructor, Joyce Bonasera (dba Bonasera Tennis), in 2017. The program has been very successful and continues to generate high rates of participation. Based on the positive track record and evaluations from participants, the Parks and Community Services Department wishes to continue to contract with Bonasera Tennis for the 2025-26 year.

5.8 Packet Pg. 35

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Staff will prepare an annual contract for this instructor per the established Purchasing and Procurement Policy.

5.8 Packet Pg. 36
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-064

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON

AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A ONE-YEAR REVENUE SHARING

AGREEMENT FOR TENNIS INSTRUCTION WITH JOYCE BONASERA (DBA BONASERA TENNIS) WITH PROJECTED PAYMENTS NOT TO EXCEED $360,681 WHEREAS, the City of San Ramon’s Parks and Community Services Department offers classes and programs through revenue sharing agreements with contracted instructors; and WHEREAS, the City of San Ramon’s purchasing policy requires City Council approval for any expenditures in an amount exceeding $100,000 annually; and WHEREAS, Joyce Bonasera (dba Bonasera Tennis) currently provides classes for the City under such an agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Community Services approved FY2025-26 Annual Budget includes the funds for this agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Ramon does hereby authorize the Mayor to execute a one-year revenue sharing agreement for tennis instruction with Joyce Bonasera dba Bonasera Tennis in an amount not to exceed $360,681.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the meeting of June 10, 2025 by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________
Mark Armstrong, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Christina Franco, City Clerk

5.8 Packet Pg. 37

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 2025
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Scott Koll, Assistant City Manager
By: Mae Mlyniec, Administrative Analyst
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-065 - Authorizing the Mayor to Execute a OneYear Revenue Sharing Agreement for Tennis Instruction with Akshay Arora (Dba Arora Tennis) with Projected Payments Not to Exceed $255,091

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends adoption of this Resolution, authorizing the Mayor to execute a one-year revenue sharing agreement for Tennis Instruction with Akshay Arora (dba Arora Tennis) with projected payments not to exceed $255,091.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The City began offering tennis classes with instructor, Akshay Arora (dba Arora Tennis), in 2017. The program has been very successful and continues to generate high rates of participation. Based on the positive track record and evaluations from participants, the Parks and Community Services Department wishes to continue to contract with Arora Tennis for the 2025- 26 year.

5.9 Packet Pg. 38

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Staff will prepare an annual contract for this instructor per the established Purchasing and Procurement Policy.

5.9 Packet Pg. 39
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-065

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON

AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A ONE-YEAR REVENUE SHARING

AGREEMENT FOR TENNIS INSTRUCTION WITH AKSHAY ARORA (DBA ARORA TENNIS) WITH PROJECTED PAYMENTS NOT TO EXCEED $255,091
WHEREAS, the City of San Ramon’s Parks and Community Services Department offers classes and programs through revenue sharing agreements with contracted instructors; and WHEREAS, The City of San Ramon’s purchasing policy requires City Council approval for any expenditures in an amount exceeding $100,000 annually; and WHEREAS, Akshay Arora (dba Arora Tennis) currently provides classes for the City under such an agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Community Services approved 2025-26 Annual Budget includes the funds for this agreement.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the meeting of June 10, 2025 by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________
Mark Armstrong, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Christina Franco, City Clerk

5.9 Packet Pg. 40

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 2025
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Scott Koll, Assistant City Manager
By: Mae Mlyniec, Administrative Analyst
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-066 - Authorizing the City Manager to Sign Exhibit C – Lease Supplement No. 13 to the San Ramon Library Lease Agreement Between the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County for the Operation of the San Ramon Library and Approve the Amount of $394,331 for July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2026

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve this Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Exhibit C - Lease Supplement No. 13 to the San Ramon Library Lease Agreement between the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County for the Operation of the San Ramon Library and approve the amount of $394,331 for July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County Library entered into the first Library Use and Maintenance Agreement in October 1989 commensurate with the opening of the San Ramon Library at 100 Montgomery Street. The original agreement was amended in March 1994 and added additional terms relative to the City’s contribution to expanded hours of service. A new 99- year term was established for the agreement from March 1994 to March 2093.

In August 2005, a new Lease Agreement, with the same terms as the presiding agreements, was executed, with the City responsible for maintenance and repair of the City-owned library building, and the County responsible for utilities, refuse collection, and reimbursement to the City for janitorial costs. The term of the new lease agreement was through December 2087 in keeping with the original 99-year agreement.

On January 25, 2011, the current Lease Agreement replaced the 2005 Lease Agreement and was approved by City Council with Resolution 2011-013. Under the current lease agreement, the City is responsible for maintenance and repair of the building, utilities, refuse collection, and janitorial costs of approximately $351,844 annually. The City is also responsible for the reimbursement for additional hours of staffing above the baseline of 40 hours each week currently funded by the County. The County updated the amount of “Base Hours” to 40 hours of service to the community on July 1, 2021 (Lease supplement No. 9).

5.10 Packet Pg. 41
The initial term of the agreement was effective from January 25, 2011, to June 30, 2011, with automatic renewals yearly unless written notice is given by either party of their intent to terminate at least one year in advance.

Exhibit C of the San Ramon Library Lease Agreement has been amended annually to reflect the schedule of costs for FY 12/13, 13/14, 14/15, 15/16, 17/18, 18/19, 19/20, 20/21, 21/22, 22/23, 23/24, and 24/25. There was no amendment in FY 16/17 due to the renovation of the San Ramon Library.

The City will continue to be responsible for the annual facility and maintenance costs, as well as to cover the cost of the sixteen “Extra Hours” bringing the total “Actual Hours” of services at the San Ramon Library to 56 hours. In addition, in 2023 the County began billing the City annually for technology equipment replacement, which is included in the annual agreement but had not been charged by the County until 2023. The anticipated cost for the technology equipment replacement for 2025/26 is $14,251.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
The City’s obligation including the sixteen additional hours is $380,080 and the technology equipment replacement cost is $14,251 for a total of $394,331 for the period of July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026. Funding for 2025/26 Library services is included in the Parks and Community Services Department adopted 2025/26 Operating Budget. Future fiscal impacts to the City are not known at this time and will be considered annually via the City and County budget process.

This exhibit is for one year only.

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Staff will work with the Contra Costa County Library administration to finalize Exhibit C - Lease Supplement No. 13 for execution by the City Manager for San Ramon Library Services.

5.10 Packet Pg. 42
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-066

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN EXHIBIT C – LEASE
SUPPLEMENT NO. 13 TO THE SAN RAMON LIBRARY LEASE AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN RAMON AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FOR THE

OPERATION OF THE SAN RAMON LIBRARY AND APPROVE THE AMOUNT OF $394,331 FOR JULY 1, 2025 – JUNE 30, 2026
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County to operate the San Ramon Library as a joint use facility; and WHEREAS, the San Ramon Library Lease Agreement between the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County for the Operation of the San Ramon Library was approved by City Council with Resolution 2011-013; and
WHEREAS, Exhibit C of the San Ramon Library Lease Agreement has been amended annually to reflect the schedule of costs for FY 12/13, 13/14, 14/15, 15/16, 17/18, 18/19, 19/20, 20/21, 21/22, 22/23, 23/24 and 24/25 (there was no amendment in FY 16/17 due to the renovation of the San Ramon Library); and
WHEREAS, Exhibit C - Lease Supplement No. 13 to the San Ramon Library Lease Agreement supersedes all previous amendments to Exhibit C and commits the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County to support the library through funding and operations as determined by the joint use library plan and the goals of each agency; and WHEREAS, under Exhibit C - Lease Supplement No. 13 to the San Ramon Library Lease Agreement, Contra Costa County will provide forty hours of baseline library services to the Community at the San Ramon Main Library; and
WHEREAS, under Exhibit C - Lease Supplement No. 13 to the San Ramon Library Lease Agreement, the City of San Ramon will fund sixteen additional hours of library services to supplement the baseline hours and the cost of technology upgrades, and provide routine and annual maintenance at the San Ramon Main Library; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Ramon adopted 2025/26 Program of Services includes funding to supplement operating hours, technology upgrades and maintenance for one year at the San Ramon Library.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Ramon does hereby authorize and direct the City Manager to execute Exhibit C - Lease Supplement No. 13 to the Lease Agreement between the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County for the joint use of the San Ramon Library.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the meeting of June 10, 2025 by the

5.10 Packet Pg. 43
following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________
Mark Armstrong, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Christina Franco, City Clerk

5.10 Packet Pg. 44

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 2025
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Scott Koll, Assistant City Manager
By: Mae Mlyniec, Administrative Analyst
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-067 - Authorizing the City Manager to Sign Exhibit a – Lease Supplement No. 6 to the Dougherty Station Library Lease and Services Agreement Between the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County for the Operation of the Dougherty Station Library and Approve an Amount of $77,024.00 for July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2026

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve this Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Exhibit A - Lease Supplement No. 6 to the Dougherty Station Library Lease and Service Agreement between the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County for the Operation of the Dougherty Station Library and approve an amount of $77,024.00 for July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The City of San Ramon, Contra Costa County, and Contra Costa Community College District entered into the first Dougherty Station Library Memorandum of Understanding in June 2007 and set forth the responsibilities of the parties in the administration, funding, and continuing development of the Dougherty Station Library. The MOU has been amended annually to reflect the schedule of costs for every year. The Contra Costa Community College paid annually a portion of the personnel costs, including one half-time Library Specialist, to increase hours of operation from the 35 baseline hours provided by the County to 50 hours a week, at a cost not to exceed $100,000. The City-funded any additional hours at DSL that exceed the $100,000 being contributed by the community college. The City also covers the cost of facility maintenance and utilities in the amount of approximately $206,746 annually.

The Community College District officially gave notice to the County and the City that they would no longer be participating in the agreement as of January 1, 2021. The Community College District built a separate library facility on campus to meet the needs of the students, faculty, and the Community.

On May 11, 2021, the San Ramon City Council approved Resolution No. 2021-065, authorizing the City Manager to enter into a new agreement with Contra Costa County for the operations of the Dougherty Station Library. The new agreement uses the same template both parties agreed to

5.11 Packet Pg. 45
for the operation of the San Ramon Library with some modifications to address the differences between the two libraries. This is the same agreement the County uses for other agencies they partner with for Library Services within the region.

In 2021, the County modified the “Base Hours” to 40 hours of service to the community. This was an increase of five additional hours of services. The City will continue to be responsible for the annual facility and maintenance costs and to cover the cost for the six “Extra Hours” bringing the total “Actual Hours” of services at the Dougherty Station Library to 46 hours. In addition, in 2023 the County began billing the City annually for technology equipment replacement, which is included in the annual agreement but had not been charged by the County until 2023. The anticipated cost for the technology equipment replacement for 2025/26 is $10,688.

Annual modification for each renewal term will continue to be handled through the Lease Supplement. The Lease Supplement will set forth the number of “Base Hours” the County will provide in the upcoming fiscal year, the number of “Extra Hours” of library services the City would like to provide, resulting in the number of “Actual Hours” and the cost of the City’s obligation.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
The City’s obligation for the six additional hours is $66,336 and the technology equipment replacement cost is $10,688 for a total of $77,024 for the period of July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2026. Funding for the Dougherty Station Library Services is included in the Parks and Community Services Department approved 2025-26 Operating Budget. Future fiscal impacts to the City are not known at this time and will be considered annually via the City and County budget process. This exhibit is for one year only.

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Staff will work with Contra Costa County Library administration to finalize the Dougherty Station Library Lease Supplement agreement for execution by the City Manager between the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County.

5.11 Packet Pg. 46
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-067

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN EXHIBIT A – LEASE
SUPPLEMENT NO. 6 TO THE DOUGHERTY STATION LIBRARY LEASE AND

SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN RAMON AND CONTRA

COSTA COUNTY FOR THE OPERATION OF THE DOUGHERTY STATION LIBRARY AND APPROVE AN AMOUNT OF $77,024.00 FOR JULY 1, 2025 – JUNE 30, 2026
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County to operate the Dougherty Station Library as a joint use facility; and WHEREAS, on May 11, 2021, the San Ramon City Council approved Resolution No. 2021-065, authorizing the City Manager to enter into the Dougherty Station Library Lease Agreement (“Lease Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, Exhibit A - Lease Supplement No. 6 to the Lease Agreement supersedes Lease Supplement No. 5 to the Lease Agreement, committing the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County to support the library through funding and operations as determined by the joint use library plan and the goals of each agency; and
WHEREAS, under the terms of Exhibit A - Lease Supplement No. 6 to the Lease Agreement, Contra Costa County will provide forty hours of baseline library services to the Community at the Dougherty Station Library; and
WHEREAS, under the terms of Exhibit A - Lease Supplement No. 6 to the Lease Agreement, the City will fund six additional hours of library services to supplement the baseline hours and cost of technology upgrades, and provide routine and annual maintenance at the Dougherty Station Library; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Ramon adopted 2025/26 budget includes funding to supplement operating hours, technology upgrades and maintenance for one year at the Dougherty Station Library.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Ramon does hereby authorize and direct the City Manager to execute Exhibit A - Lease Supplement No. 6 to the Lease Agreement between the City of San Ramon and Contra Costa County for the joint use of the Dougherty Station Library.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the meeting of June 10, 2025 by the following votes:

AYES:

5.11 Packet Pg. 47
NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________
Mark Armstrong, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Christina Franco, City Clerk

5.11 Packet Pg. 48

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 2025
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Scott Koll, Assistant City Manager
By: Mae Mlyniec, Administrative Analyst
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-068 - Authorizing the Mayor to Execute Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement (C2021-048) with RydeTrans for Senior Citizens’ Transportation Services, Authorizing a Time Extension to June 30, 2026, and Authorizing Additional Funds of $3,898 for a Cumulative FiveYear Total Not to Exceed $201,367

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt this resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement (C2021-048) with RydeTrans for Senior Citizens’ Transportation Services, authorizing a time extension to June 30, 2026, and authorizing additional funds of $3,898 for a cumulative five-year total not to exceed $201,367.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The City of San Ramon’s senior citizen transportation program began in the early 1990s, when the County Connection reduced its service route throughout the City and the Senior Advisory Committee and staff became aware of many senior citizens who could no longer drive their vehicles and therefore were unable to access programs and services provided at the Center. In 2014, the City received grant funding of $130,000 for one 7-passenger van and one 16-passenger van from the Federal Transit Administration Section 5310 Elderly and Disabled Specialized Grant Program. During this time, the City utilized volunteer drivers; however, staffing issues arose and led to cancelled service. Staff recommended that the City contract these transportation services to ensure the highest quality services for residents and provide better consistency then could be accomplished with volunteers.

In November 2013, the Senior Advisory Committee presented its annual report to the Parks & Community Services Commission and the City Council, stating their concerns regarding the lack of volunteer drivers for the Senior Express Van program. At that time, the committee submitted two annual goals to help improve the program 1) work with staff on recruiting volunteer drivers, and 2) research local transportation needs of San Ramon Seniors and provide input to the Transportation Advisory Committee.

The 2014/15 the approved Operating Budget included a Major Action Plan to improve reliability of the Senior Express Van program through utilizing contract or employee drivers to maximize

5.12 Packet Pg. 49
use of vans and avoid cancellation of the programs. After exploring the two options, the Department staff recommended that a contract service would be more reliable than employee drivers. The approach also limited the City’s liability in that the drivers are not city employees or volunteers, and the training and technical abilities of the drivers would be enhanced by using a professional transportation contractor. In September 2014, the City commenced service utilizing contract drivers to perform the duties for the Senior Express Van program.

On January 25, 2021, the City advertised the Request for Qualifications (RFQ) on the City website, and notified twelve (12) firms in the transportation business that the City would be accepting statements of qualifications to provide senior citizen transportation services. On February 19, 2021, a Pre-Submittal meeting was held via Zoom with four firms attending.

The City received statements of qualifications from the following four qualified vendors by the due date of February 25, 2021:

1. A-Para Transit Corp. (Name changed to RydeTrans)

2. Black Tie Transportation

3. MV Transportation, Inc.

4. Michael’s Transportation Services, Inc.

A selection panel consisting of City staff (Recreation Supervisor at the Alcosta Senior and Community Center, Program Manager of Senior Services, and the City of San Ramon’s Transportation Division Manager) rated each statement of qualification. Each vendor was rated on the following criteria:

1. General Qualifications

2. Relevant Experience

3. Proposed Staffing

4. Pricing

5. Proposed Approach

6. References

7. Interview (if requested)
Following the first round of review, the two highest scoring vendors, RydeTrans and MV Transportation, Inc., were selected to participate in an interview with City staff. While both vendors demonstrated the capability to meet or exceed the requirements of the Parks and Community Services Department, the team found that RydeTrans presented the best overall service exhibiting the ability to perform the required responsibilities in a superior format as compared to the other respondents. RydeTrans scored highest overall in all categories previously mentioned. Most notably, RydeTrans will provide tablets for each passenger van and software that will determine trip routes, provide electronic route manifests and routes, and allow City staff to track the vehicles while in service. RydeTrans will provide training to City staff on how to utilize the software. Additionally, RydeTrans has demonstrated an extensive driver training process for new staff, including enhanced safety training from the Transit & Paratransit Company (TAPTCO). All RydeTrans drivers will continually receive regular training from the corporation.

5.12 Packet Pg. 50
The City Council authorized the Mayor to enter into a two-year agreement in the amount of $119,311.00 with the option to renew for three successive one-year terms for professional senior citizens transportation services within CITY limits by adopting Resolution No. 2021-067 on May 25, 2021. On June 27, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-073, authorizing execution of Amendment No. 1 to the original Agreement for additional funds of $61,369.00 for a cumulative 3-year Agreement amount not-to-exceed $180,680.00. On September 13, 2023, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-098 on September 13, 2023, authorizing execution of Amendment No. 2 to the original Agreement, for correcting the hourly rate for drivers using cityowned vehicles for senior passengers to $59.91. This was followed by City Council adopting Resolution No. 2024-076 on June 25, 2024, authorizing the execution of Amendment No. 3 to the original Agreement for additional funds of $16,789 for a cumulative 4-year agreement in an amount not to exceed $197,469.

RydeTrans has done an acceptable job, and staff recommends extending the agreement and authorizing additional funds of $3,898 for a 5-year cumulative total not to exceed $201,367. The term for Amendment No. 4 would conclude on June 30, 2026.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
The City has paid RydeTrans a cumulative total of $126,789 for senior citizen transportation services from July 2021 to April 2025. The estimated remaining payments for this 2024/25 fiscal year are $8,400. The requested contract amount for FY2025/26, including a 25% contingency, is $66,178. Due to savings from unused contract funds from Amendment No. 3, Staff is requesting additional funds be authorized in the amount of $3,898 for Amendment No. 4.

Payments to RydeTrans to date: $126,789
Estimated payments through 6/30/25: + $8,400
Sub-total: $135,189
Amendment No. 3 (FY24-25) request: $197,469
Minus payments through 6/30/25: - $135,189
Unused funds from Am. No. 3: $62,280
2025/26 Contract + 25% contingency: $66,178
Minus unused funds from Am. No. 3: - $62,280
Amendment No. 4 Request: $3,898
The FY 2025/26 Parks and Community Services Department’s budget includes the projected revenue to help offset this expense.

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Staff will prepare the contract for RydeTrans per the established Purchasing and Procurement Policy.

5.12 Packet Pg. 51

5.12 Packet Pg. 52
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-068

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE AGREEMENT (C2021-048) WITH RYDETRANS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS’ TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, AUTHORIZING A TIME EXTENSION TO JUNE 30, 2026, AND AUTHORIZING ADDITIONAL FUNDS OF $3,898 FOR A CUMULATIVE FIVE-YEAR TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED $201,367
WHEREAS, the City previously entered into an Agreement with RydeTrans for Senior Citizens’ Transportation Services on June 8, 2021 for $119,311; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-073 on June 27, 2023 authorizing execution of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for additional funds of $61,369 for a cumulative 3-year Agreement amount not-to-exceed $180,680; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-098 on September 13, 2023, authorizing execution of an Amendment No. 2 to the original Agreement for correcting the hourly rate for drivers using city-owned vehicles for senior passengers to $59.91; and WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-076 on June 25, 2024 authorizing execution of Amendment No. 3 for a time extension to June 30, 2025, and additional funds of $16,789 for a cumulative four-year Agreement in an amount not-to-exceed $197,469; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to extend the terms of the Agreement including the amendments, to June 30, 2026 and authorize additional funds of $3,898 for a cumulative 5-year Agreement amount not to exceed $201,367.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Ramon does hereby authorize the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 4 to the agreement (C2021- 048) with RydeTrans for Senior Citizens’ Transportation Services, authorizing additional funds of $3,898 for a cumulative five-year total not to exceed $201,367.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the meeting of June 10, 2025 by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

5.12 Packet Pg. 53
________________________
Mark Armstrong, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________
Christina Franco, City Clerk

5.12 Packet Pg. 54

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 2025
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Brian Bornstein, Public Works Director
By: Gloria Lee, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-069 - Accepting Offers of Dedication of Parcels A (APN 209-232-008) and B (APN 209-232-009) in Subdivision 4121 Located on Bollinger Canyon Road Near Dos Rios Drive

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In the early 1970s, Contra Costa County approved the development of the Twin Creeks community, located on the west side of San Ramon Valley Boulevard between Crow Canyon Road and Norris Canyon Road. As part of this development, Parcels A (APN 209-232-008) and B (APN 209-232-009) within Subdivision 4121, which was located between private properties and Bollinger Canyon Road, were offered for dedication to the County. However, consistent with the standard practice at the time, the County neither accepted nor rejected the dedication. These parcels are currently improved with mature eucalyptus trees, which frequently shed bark and limbs, creating safety concerns for pedestrians and increasing fire risk. Although the parcels were never formally accepted, the City has occasionally performed limited maintenance in response to these hazards. Staff now recommends formally accepting the dedication of Parcels A and B to establish clear ownership and maintenance responsibility, enhance public safety, mitigate fire risks, and support proactive planning of staff resources and maintenance budgets.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends approval of this Resolution accepting the offer of dedication of Parcels A and B in Subdivision 4121.

BACKGROUND
In the early 1970s, Contra Costa County (County) approved the development of the Twin Creeks community, located on the west side of San Ramon Valley Boulevard between Crow Canyon Road and Norris Canyon Road. As part of this development, the right-of-way for Bollinger Canyon Road was established through recorded Final Maps. Subdivision 4121 includes two narrow non-buildable parcels, identified as Parcels A and B, located between Bollinger Canyon Road and adjacent private properties near Dos Rios Drive (Exhibit A). These two parcels represent residual slivers of land between the roadway and adjacent properties that were not suitable for development. These parcels were offered for dedication to the County on the final map at the time of subdivision approval. However, consistent with standard practice during that

5.13 Packet Pg. 55
period, the County neither accepted nor rejected the dedication. With no formal acceptance of the dedication, and the original developer no longer in existence, responsibility for maintenance of these parcels has remained undefined.

DISCUSSION
Parcels A and B of Subdivision 4121 are currently improved with mature and tall eucalyptus trees, with trunk diameters ranging from 17 to 52 inches. These trees are situated immediately adjacent to the public sidewalk and roadway. The eucalyptus trees in question have been identified as posing potential risks due to their size and structural characteristics. Over time, these trees have shown signs of increased branch failure or toppling, especially during adverse weather conditions. The cause of this is mainly the tree heights, branch weights and shallow root systems resulting from lack of maintenance. These trees also shed branches and bark unpredictably, creating safety hazards for pedestrians and accumulating flammable debris that increases fire risks. Although the City has occasionally performed limited maintenance in response to public safety concerns, the parcels have largely remained unmaintained under unclear ownership. Additionally, the original developer who once owned these parcels no longer exists, further complicating maintenance responsibilities.

During a storm event in 2024, one of the eucalyptus trees in Parcel A failed at the root and fell across the southbound lanes of Bollinger Canyon Road, blocking the roadway. The failure was attributed to saturated soil conditions and the weight of overgrown branches extending toward the roadway. Although no injuries or property damages were reported, the incident underscored the importance of consistent and proactive maintenance to ensure public safety.

Accepting the offer of dedication of Parcels A and B will allow the City to manage these areas proactively through routine tree maintenance, debris removal, and vegetation control to reduce safety risks and fire hazards. Formal ownership will enable the City to plan and schedule routine maintenance activities as necessary in a timely manner, helping to prevent catastrophic tree failures.

It should be noted that there are additional eucalyptus trees located on private properties near Parcels A and B. These trees are situated outside the Parcels A and B and will remain under private ownership. Maintenance of those trees in private property will remain with the respective property owners.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
Upon acceptance, the City will undertake maintenance activities such as tree pruning, weed abatement and debris removal. These activities are estimated to cost $2,500 annually using Public Works - Public Services Operating Budget.

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Following the acceptance of these offers of dedication, an executed copy of this Resolution will be recorded with the Contra Costa County Clerk Recorder’s Office. The City will begin

5.13 Packet Pg. 56
maintenance of these parcels on June 11, 2025.

ATTACHMENT
A - Location Map

5.13 Packet Pg. 57
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-069

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION OF PARCELS A (APN 209-232-008) AND B (APN 209-232-009) IN SUBDIVISION 4121 LOCATED ON BOLLINGER CANYON

ROAD NEAR DOS RIOS DRIVE
WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approved the Final Map for Subdivision 4121 on August 24, 1971; and
WHEREAS, Parcels A (APN 209-232-008) and B (APN 209-232-009) were offered for dedication to Contra Costa County or its designee for ownership with the Final Map for Subdivision 4121; and
WHEREAS, Parcels A and B consist of unbuildable slivers of land located between the Bollinger Canyon Road public right-of-way and adjacent private properties; and WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors neither accepted nor rejected the offer of dedication of Parcels A and B; and WHEREAS, the existing landscape improvements on Parcels A and B have not been adequately maintained due to ownership complications, resulting in safety hazards and increased fire risk; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that assuming maintenance responsibility for these parcels is necessary to address public safety concerns and mitigate fire hazards; and WHEREAS, the City of San Ramon desires to accept the offer of dedication for Parcels A and B in order to establish clear ownership and maintenance responsibilities, enhance public safety, mitigate fire risks, and enable efficient staff planning and maintenance budgets.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Ramon does hereby accept the offer of dedication of Parcels A and B as shown on the Final Map for Subdivision 4121.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the meeting of June 10, 2025 by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

5.13 Packet Pg. 58
________________________
Mark Armstrong, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________
Christina Franco, City Clerk

5.13 Packet Pg. 59

5.13.a
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: A - Location Map (2025-069 : Accepting Parcels A&B Subdivision 4121)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 2025
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Brian Bornstein, Public Works Director
By: Chris Weeks, Transportation Division Manager
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-070 - Approving the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Between the City of San Ramon and Measure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency (TRAFFIX) Program for Administrative Staff Services for a Five Year Limited Term Assignment Beginning July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2030, Funded by the TRAFFIX Program

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Measure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency (TRAFFIX) has an overarching goal of reducing traffic congestion within the San Ramon Valley, and since 2009, provides weekday school bus transportation to 1,300 students using 24 school buses serving 11 school sites. The last five-year MOU between the City and TRAFFIX for administrative services was recently amended with a new expiration date of June 30, 2025. This new five-year extension of the MOU details the terms and conditions for the City to continue to provide administrative staff services to TRAFFIX program beginning July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2030, funded by the TRAFFIX Program.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends approval of this Resolution approving another extension of the MOU between the City of San Ramon and TRAFFIX for administrative staff services for a Five Year Limited Term Assignment beginning July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2030, funded by the TRAFFIX Program.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The passage of Measure J in November 2004 authorized a 25-year extension of the existing Countywide ½-cent Sales Tax Measure for Congestion Relief. The “Safe Transportation for Children” program category in Measure J provides approximately $40 million for the development and operation of a School Bus Program, or other projects that would reduce school related congestion in the San Ramon Valley. The funds for the Program became available July 1, 2009.

In 2008, the governance structure for TRAFFIX was created with the intention that a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) would provide Program management and oversight of contract services.

5.14 Packet Pg. 61
To achieve this, the JPA intended to contract for all program services, including the day-to-day Program management and oversight of contract services to an independent contractor. In order for the JPA to enter into contracts, the following took place:

1. Created a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (JEPA) to establish a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) “an agency” that is responsible for managing, operating and maintaining a school transportation services to alleviate traffic congestion within the San Ramon Valley.

2. On September 23, 2008, the San Ramon City Council adopted Resolution 2008-198 approving the City’s participation in the Measure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency (TRAFFIX) JEPA.

3. Appointed two (2) representatives to the JPA from three public agencies (San Ramon, Danville, and the San Ramon Valley Unified School District) and one alternate from each agency. The Contra Costa County District 3 Supervisor also serves as the County representative on the JPA.

4. At the inaugural TRAFFIX JPA meeting held on October 21, 2008, several critical decisions were made including:
a. Adopted Rules of the Board;
b. Elected Chair and Vice Chair;
c. Designated Interim Contract Program Administrator (Danville); d. Designated Interim Treasurer (San Ramon);
e. Appointed Legal Counsel (Hanson Bridgett LLP);
f. Authorized the release of an RFQ/RFP for a Contract Program Administrator; and
g. Adopted the 2008 and 2009 meeting calendars.

The first Contract Program Administrator was selected in January 2009, and since that time, there have been four contract Program Administrators. In January 2018, the Contract Program Administrator informed the TRAFFIX Board of Directors that they did not intend to renew their contract beyond June 2018. As a result, the TRAFFIX Board circulated a Request for Proposal in January 2019; however, they rejected the one proposal submitted as unqualified. Instead, the Board articulated their desire to enter a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with one of the public agency members of the JPA.

Subsequently, at the TRAFFIX Board of Directors meeting on April 18, 2018, the Board approved a proposal by City of San Ramon staff to provide TRAFFIX administrative staff support services for a two-year, limited-term assignment, effective May 2018 to May 2020. On May 8, 2018, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2018-052 approving the Employee Classification of Administrative Coordinator to provide administrative staff services to Measure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency - TRAFFIX for a two-year, limited-term assignment, funded by the TRAFFIX Program. On July 1, 2020, the City of San Ramon extended the existing twoyear TRAFFIX MOU for a five-year term that expired on May 4, 2025. On March 17, 2025, staff executed Amendment 1 that extended the TRAFFIX MOU for two months, from May 4, 2025 to June 30, 2025 to coincide with a fiscal year renewal. Thus, this proposed new 5-year MOU is set to begin on July 1, 2025 and expire on June 30, 2030, and will provide the same services as the previous 5-year MOU, as outlined below:

5.14 Packet Pg. 62
Organizational Structure
San Ramon
The Administrative Coordinator will be within the City of San Ramon’s Employee Classification. On May 8, 2018, the City Council approved an Employee Classification of Administrative Coordinator as an equivalent classification to the TRAFFIX Program Manager.

The TRAFFIX Administrative Coordinator position has been within the Transportation Division of Public Works Department, and reports directly to the Transportation Division Manager.

TRAFFIX
TRAFFIX is an independent JPA with a seven-member Board of Directors. The day-to-day Program administration is provided by City of San Ramon staff on a five-year, limited-term assignment, with supervisory oversight supplemented by the Technical Advisory Group (TAG) and with community input from a Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC).

Program Implementation
Scope of Work
The TRAFFIX Scope of Work has been modified slightly to reflect the transition from a Contract Program Manager to City of San Ramon Administrative Coordinator. The revised Scope of Work has been approved by TRAFFIX Board.

The San Ramon Transportation Division Manager provides the day-to-day management oversight and performs an annual performance review of the Administrative Coordinator. The Administrative Coordinator provides comprehensive day-to-day program support and implementation, including program administration, front-line customer service, ticket sales, program marketing, and operations support. The details of the role are included in the attached MOU (Attachment A).

FISCAL ANALYSIS
There will be no direct fiscal impact on the City’s General Fund. TRAFFIX will fully fund the Administrative Coordinator position. The total reimbursement to the City for the Administrative Coordinator position is approximately $1,252,475, with additional annual increases of 0-6% based on performance reviews.

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
The City Attorney’s Office will forward Measure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency (TRAFFIX) Memorandum of Understanding to TRAFFIX JPA for signature.

ATTACHMENT

5.14 Packet Pg. 63
A - City of San RamonMeasure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency (TRAFFIX) Memorandum of Understanding

5.14 Packet Pg. 64
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-070

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON

APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE

CITY OF SAN RAMON AND MEASURE J TRAFFIC CONGESTION RELIEF

AGENCY (TRAFFIX) PROGRAM FOR ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF SERVICES FOR A FIVE YEAR LIMITED TERM ASSIGNMENT BEGINNING JULY 1, 2025 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2030, FUNDED BY THE TRAFFIX PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the passage of Measure J in November 2004 authorized a 25-year extension of the existing Countywide ½-cent Sales Tax Measure for Congestion Relief, which provides approximately $40M for the development and operation of a School Bus Program or other projects that would reduce school-related congestion in the San Ramon Valley, with the funds for the Program becoming available July 1, 2009; and
WHEREAS, since 2009, the Measure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency (TRAFFIX) provides 24 school buses to 11 school sites, serving approximately 1,300 students; and WHEREAS, TRAFFIX has ensured the delivery of a safe, efficient, and effective student transportation bus service that accomplishes the overarching goal of traffic congestion reduction within the San Ramon Valley; and
WHEREAS, the San Ramon City Council adopted Resolution No. 2008-198 approving the City's participation in the Measure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency (TRAFFIX) Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement on September 23, 2008; and WHEREAS, in 2008, the governance structure for TRAFFIX was created with the intention that a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) would provide Program management and oversight of contract services, and achieve this by contracting for all Program services, including the dayto-day Program management and oversight of contract services to an independent contractor; and WHEREAS, the first Contract Program Administrator was selected in January 2009, and in January 2018, the Contract Program Administrator informed the TRAFFIX Board of Directors (Board) that they did not intend to renew their contract beyond June 2018; and WHEREAS, in May 2018, the TRAFFIX Board articulated their desire to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with one of the public agency members of the JPA; and WHEREAS, the TRAFFIX Board met on April 18, 2018 and approved a proposal by the City of San Ramon staff to provide TRAFFIX administrative staff support services for a twoyear, limited-term assignment, which expired June 30, 2020; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2020, the City of San Ramon extended the existing TRAFFIX MOU for a five-year term ending on May 4, 2025; and

5.14 Packet Pg. 65
WHEREAS, on July 28, 2020 the Council approved resolution 2020-074 and the 5-year agreement; and
WHEREAS, within the City's Employee Classification descriptions, the current TRAFFIX Program Manager responsibilities are equivalent to that of an Administrative Coordinator; and
WHEREAS, the TRAFFIX Board met on March 17, 2025, and approved Amendment 1 extending the TRAFFIX MOU for two months, from May 4, 2025 to June 30, 2025 to coincide with a fiscal year renewal; and
WHEREAS, the TRAFFIX Board met on May 19, 2025, and approved a proposal by City of San Ramon staff to provide TRAFFIX administrative staff support services through June 30, 2030; and
WHEREAS, the Transportation Division Manager will provide the day-to-day management oversight, while the Administrative Coordinator will provide the overall day-to-day TRAFFIX Program services and implementation; and
WHEREAS, the MOU between the City of San Ramon and TRAFFIX will stipulate that the City will not provide funding towards the TRAFFIX Administrative Coordinator position and that the position must be fully funded by TRAFFIX for approximately $1,252,475 with an additional expected incremental 0-6% increase each year for performance-based compensation increases for staff.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Ramon does hereby approve the MOU between the City of San Ramon and Measure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency - TRAFFIX Program for administrative staff services beginning July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2030, funded by the TRAFFIX Program.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, at the meeting of June 10, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Mark Armstrong, Mayor
ATTEST:

5.14 Packet Pg. 66
___________________________
Christina Franco, City Clerk

5.14 Packet Pg. 67
Traffix – City of San Ramon Memorandum of Understanding

Page 1 of 7 ends

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

BETWEEN CITY OF SAN RAMON AND

TRAFFIX
THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) is entered into as of 2025, by and between the Measure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency – TRAFFIX (Traffix), and the City of San Ramon, a municipal Corporation (City), collectively referred to as the Parties.

RECITALS
WHEREAS, Traffix is a Joint Powers Authority (JPA), formed in 2008 to provide school buses to eleven (11) school sites serving approximately 1,300 students in the San Ramon Valley; and WHEREAS, the passage of Measure J in November 2004 authorized a 25-year extension of the existing county-wide 1/2 cent sales tax measure for congestion relief. The “Safe Transportation for Children’s program category within Measure J provides approximately $40 million for the development and operation of a school bus program or other such projects that would reduce school-related congestion within the San Ramon Valley; and
WHEREAS, the funds for the program became available July 1, 2009; and WHEREAS, the Traffix JPA consists of the four public agencies, the City, the Town of Danville, the San Ramon Valley Unified School District, and unincorporated areas of the Contra Costa County within the southwest region; and
WHEREAS, the Traffix JPA desires to utilize the City for services relating to the job duties of an Administrative Coordinator; and
WHEREAS, the Traffix JPA previously engaged with the City for a five-year limited term contract for the term of January 21, 2020, through June 30, 2025, approved by the Traffix JPA at its September 22, 2020 meeting, and Amendment #1 at its March 17, 2025 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to renew and engage the City in providing administrative services to Traffix for another five-year limited term contract; and WHEREAS, the Traffix Board of Directors on May 19, 2025 authorized Traffix to enter into the MOU stated herein; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized the City Manager to enter into the MOU stated herein, approved by City Council on June 10, 2025, Resolution No. 2025-XX.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth, CITY and Traffix agree as follows:

1. Scope of Services. The City shall provide administrative services, as set out in the Administrative Services Proposal – Scope of Work, attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.

2. Time of Performance. The City’s performance shall commence on July 1, 2025 and shall be completed by June 30, 2030.

5.14.a
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: A - City of San RamonMeasure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency (TRAFFIX) Memorandum of Understanding (2025-070 : Traffix Traffix – City of San Ramon Memorandum of Understanding

Page 2 of 7 ends

3. Compensation. The City shall be compensated at the rate and according to the payment schedule outline in Exhibit A. The City Finance Department charges a 15% overhead fee when departments bill outside agencies or companies such as Traffix JPA. This overhead fee is included in the prices listed below:

The Administrative Coordinator compensation will increase by 0-6% each year based on the Administrative Coordinator’s annual performance review, outlined in the City’s most current Personnel Rules and Regulations. The total cost for the term of this contract is estimated to be $1,252,475 or $222,184 per year minimum and $280,503 per year maximum, which includes an expected incremental increase ranging from 0-6% per year according to the Administrative Coordinator’s performance-based compensation.

The schedule of Administrative Coordinator funding for services which include the cost of labor, benefits, materials, and the 0-6% performance-based compensation are as follows:

A. Year 1 Fiscal Year 2025-2026: a not-to-exceed amount of $18,515 per month; B. Year 2 Fiscal Year 2026-2027: a not-to-exceed amount of $19,626 per month; C. Year 3 Fiscal Year 2027-2028: a not-to-exceed amount of $20,804 per month; D. Year 4 Fiscal Year 2028-2029: a not-to-exceed amount of $22,052 per month; and E. Year 5 Fiscal Year 2029-2030: a not-to-exceed amount of $23,375 per month.

4. Administrative Coordinator. The position is an at-will limited-term contract employee subject to the City’s Personnel Rules and Regulations.

5. Invoicing, Payments, Notices. The City shall submit invoices to Traffix by the 5th of each month.

Invoices shall describe the beginning and end dates of the billing period and services performed.

Traffix designated Fiscal Agent shall pay the City for services rendered as outlined in Exhibit A and at the rate listed in Section 3, Compensation. Payment shall be made within net thirty (30) days from the receipt of the City’s invoice.

Transmittal of notices, invoices, and communication are as follows:

Traffix Board of Directors: City:

Traffix City of San Ramon
c/o Hanson Bridgett c/o Public Works Director
1676 N. California Blvd., Suite 620 7000 Bollinger Canyon Road Walnut Creek, CA 94596 San Ramon, CA 94583
ATTN: Michael N. Conneran

6. Designated Representatives.

A. Traffix designates Michael N. Conneran, Legal Counsel, or his designee as its representative in all matters under this MOU.

B. City designates Chris Weeks, Division Manager, as its representative in all matters under this MOU.

5.14.a
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: A - City of San RamonMeasure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency (TRAFFIX) Memorandum of Understanding (2025-070 : Traffix Traffix – City of San Ramon Memorandum of Understanding

Page 3 of 7 ends

7. Coordination of Counsel: Parties acknowledge that City will provide legal counsel as to the Administrative Coordinator’s performance and conduct as outlined in the Coordinators limited-term contract employee agreement. Traffix will provide legal counsel as to matters related to the Traffix administration and program, such as operations and liability arising from the program itself.

8. Modification and Renewal. Sixty (60) days prior to the end of the contract period, City shall provide written notice to Traffix of the City’s desire to extend the term of this MOU. Any MOU modification or renewal must be in writing and fully executed by both parties to take effect.

9. Public Records. Parties acknowledge that the City is subject to the provisions of the California Public Records Act (Govt. Code § 7920.000, et seq.) (the “Act”); therefore, this MOU and any writing prepared for or submitted to CITY, is subject to disclosure as a public record, unless any portion thereof is exempt under the Act. If Traffix believes that any portion of a public record is exempt from disclosure under the Act, it must clearly identify the portion(s) it believes to be exempt and identify the basis for the exemption. Traffix bears the burden of proving any claimed exemption under the Act, Traffix agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless CITY against any third-party claim seeking disclosure of the public record or any portions thereof.

10. Entire Agreement, Time of Essence, No Waiver. The parties agree that this MOU is the complete expression of the terms of this MOU and any oral representations or understandings not incorporated in this MOU are excluded. Failure to comply with any of the provisions of this MOU shall constitute material breach of contract and cause for termination. Both parties recognize that time is of the essence in the performance of the provisions of this MOU. It is also agreed by the parties that the forgiveness of the nonperformance of any provision of this MOU does not constitute a waiver of the provisions of this MOU.

11. Signatures and Counterparts. This MOU may be entered into by the Parties by signing any one or more counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. It is understood and agreed that this MOU shall become effective and binding when one or more counterparts have been executed by each party and delivered to each other party. Additionally, electronic, facsimile, and scanned signatures shall be binding the same as originals.

Signatures on the following page.

5.14.a
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: A - City of San RamonMeasure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency (TRAFFIX) Memorandum of Understanding (2025-070 : Traffix Traffix – City of San Ramon Memorandum of Understanding

Page 4 of 7 ends

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Traffix Board of Directors and the City of San Ramon have executed this MOU as of the date first written above.

MEASURE J TRAFFIC CONGESTION

RELIEF AGENCY
“Traffix”
CITY OF SAN RAMON, a municipal
Corporation
“City”
Candace Andersen, Traffix Chair Steven Spedowfski, City Manager The foregoing MOU has been reviewed and
APPROVED AS TO FORM: approval is recommended
Michael N. Conneran, Legal Counsel Brian Bornstein, Public Works Director APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Martin Lysons, City Attorney
ATTEST:

Christina Franco, City Clerk

5.14.a
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: A - City of San RamonMeasure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency (TRAFFIX) Memorandum of Understanding (2025-070 : Traffix Traffix – City of San Ramon Memorandum of Understanding

Page 5 of 7 ends

EXHIBIT A
CITY – TRAFFIX ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATOR

SCOPE OF WORK
Definition
Under general supervision, the Traffix Administrative Coordinator performs, coordinates, and oversees technical and administrative support functions related to Traffix matters, within one or more programs or departments. Responsibilities include providing complex administrative support to managerial, professional, and supervisory staff, and/or directly coordinating specific projects and operations. May supervise technical and clerical personnel; develop and implement improved office and departmental procedures; act independently in conducting basic management studies; and perform related work as required.

Supervision Received and Exercised
Receives general supervision from the assigned Department Director or Division Manager. Provides supervision to assigned administrative support staff.

Class Characteristics
This is the first supervisory-level classification in the administrative support series. Responsibilities include organizing and overseeing program or office administration, supporting management functions, implementing policies and procedures, and overseeing special projects. This position also includes supervision of administrative staff. The role requires frequent public contact and the use of independent judgment and technical knowledge related to the division or program. It is distinguished from the Administrative Analyst classification, which is a professional-level role requiring a four-year degree and focusing on higher-level research, analysis, and recommendations.

PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION

1. Agenda Development, Posting, and Distribution
o Coordinate with the Chair to develop agendas, packets, and meeting notices for the Board of Directors (BOD), Technical Advisory Group (TAG), and Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC), and any other sub-committee or ad-hoc committee created by the BOD. o Prepare staff reports and compile agenda packets; distribute digitally and print copies for meetings.
o Coordinate with the Chair Agency’s City Clerk to ensure proper posting of agendas in compliance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and other applicable laws; update the website accordingly.
o Develop and maintain a schedule for agenda preparation and distribution.

2. Meeting Attendance and Coordination
o Coordinate room reservations and equipment needs (e.g., projector, easels, ADA access) with the TAG Chair or designee.
o Confirm Board attendance 72 hours prior to meetings; notify TAG Chair if quorum may not be reached.

5.14.a
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: A - City of San RamonMeasure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency (TRAFFIX) Memorandum of Understanding (2025-070 : Traffix Traffix – City of San Ramon Memorandum of Understanding

Page 6 of 7 ends

o Set up meeting rooms, including agendas, speaker cards, name placards, and seating. o Record audio of Board meetings as determined by the TAG Chair. o Take meeting notes, including attendance, motions, and vote records. o Prepare a Summary of Actions for Board meetings.

3. Recordkeeping
o Prepare official documents (e.g., resolutions, action summaries) for Board Chair signature. o Prepare and confirm monthly invoices for processing by the Accountant. o Maintain and update financial records and permanent files. o Collaborate with TRAFFIX Accountants to prepare mid-year and annual financial plans for BOD approval.
o Maintain updated contact information for BOD, TAG, and CAC members.

4. Website Management
o Update website content including route schedules, maps, agendas, and minutes. o Maintain the TRAFFIX client and student records database. o Provide continuous updates to improve website functionality, appearance, and content.

CUSTOMER SERVICE

1. Service Alerts
o Notify customers of schedule changes, minimum day schedules, and other alerts via text.

2. Customer Inquiry Management
o Answer calls during operating hours (7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on school days). o Respond to phone and email inquiries within 1–2 business days. o Escalate unresolved inquiries to TAG as needed.
o Maintain a monthly log of customer interactions.
o Maintain sales and ridership database.

SALES AND MARKETING

1. Bus Pass Sales
o Process new sales; arrange printing, distribution, and issue refunds as applicable. o Coordinate replacement of lost or damaged passes.
o Participate in on-site sales events (e.g., open houses, school registrations, community events).

2. Banking
o Deposit checks as needed.

5.14.a
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: A - City of San RamonMeasure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency (TRAFFIX) Memorandum of Understanding (2025-070 : Traffix Traffix – City of San Ramon Memorandum of Understanding

Page 7 of 7 ends

3. Marketing Plan
o Collaborate with TAG and CAC to develop and implement strategic marketing plans, including school-specific outreach.

4. Public Relations and Communications
o Draft communications for media, websites, and social platforms. o Coordinate email communications with school sites and PTA groups. o Attend school events and presentations.
o Meet with principals, PTA members, and community stakeholders to promote the program.

5. Marketing Materials
o Oversee development and distribution of promotional materials (e.g., brochures, maps, rack cards, banners).
o Coordinate direct mail campaigns as needed.

6. Survey Management
o Prepare, distribute, and analyze the annual parent survey.

OPERATIONS

1. Service Provider Oversight
o Monitor the student transportation service contract.
o Offer input on route planning and change requests during biannual meetings with First Student and TAG.
o Communicate with the service provider regarding operational issues (e.g., on-time performance, driver rosters, dispatch requests).
o Serve as liaison between agencies and the service provider regarding road construction impacts.

2. Student Discipline
o Receive reports on student behavior from service providers. o Coordinate with principals to address behavioral issues as directed. o Facilitate resolution of behavior concerns with school administration.

3. Driver Recognition and Engagement
o Organize 2–3 Driver Appreciation Luncheons annually.
o Promote Unity Day and Bus Driver Awareness Week.

4. Operational Coordination
o Provide annual and ad hoc school bell schedules to First Student. o Coordinate collection of student data and boundary information from the school district.

5.14.a
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: A - City of San RamonMeasure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency (TRAFFIX) Memorandum of Understanding (2025-070 : Traffix

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 2025
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Brian Bornstein, Public Works Director
By: Gary Manuel, Landscape Program Manager
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-071 - Confirming the Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Diagram and Assessments and Levying the Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/26

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (District) Engineer’s Report includes minor changes from the previous year. Staff is proposing a maximum assessment cap increase to $443.96 and an assessment rate of $295.99 for FY 2025/26. This public hearing is the final action required to confirm the assessment diagram and levy the assessments. The final Engineer’s Report, together with the assessment roll and the assessment diagram, will be filed with the Contra Costa County Assessor’s Office by August 10, 2025.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council conduct the Public Hearing and approve this Resolution confirming The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District diagram and assessments and levying The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/2026.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The District was formed on March 13, 2018, through adoption of Resolution No. 2018-033, to fund the proposed public landscaping program associated with The Preserve (Faria) Development. Property owners within the District will pay an annual assessment to fund the maintenance of public landscaping. Such maintenance is performed through a combination of City staff and contractors.

To reestablish a Landscaping and Lighting District under the California Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Streets and Highways Code §22500 et seq.) (Act), a local agency must follow a structured legal process. The first step necessary to re-establish the District for FY 2025/26 was completed on March 11, 2025, when the City Council approved Resolution No. 2025-028, describing new improvements and ordering the District Engineer to prepare and file the Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26. The FY 2025/26 Engineer's Report (Attachment A) is

8.1 Packet Pg. 75
outlined by the Act as the second step necessary to re-establish the District. The final step required by the Act is to conduct a Public Hearing and adopt a Resolution confirming the diagram and assessments and levying the assessments for FY 2025/26. This allows staff to prepare the database of parcels and corresponding assessments to be included on the property tax roll, which must be submitted to the Contra Costa County Assessor's Office by August 10, 2025.

On May 21, 2025, staff presented an overview of the FY 2025/26 District budget to the Finance Committee. Staff reviewed the process and improvements with the Committee and received comments. The Committee recommended that the report be forwarded to the Council.

On May 27, 2025, City Council approved Resolution No. 2025-051 approving the District Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26, adopting a Resolution of Intention to levy and collect assessments for FY 2025/26, and setting a public hearing for June 10, 2025.

District Formation
The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District was formed on March 13, 2018, through the adoption of Resolution No. 2018-033, to fund the proposed public landscaping program associated with The Preserve (Faria) Development. Property owners within the District will pay an annual assessment to fund the maintenance of public landscaping. Such maintenance is performed through a combination of City staff and contractors.

Improvements
All improvements to be maintained by the District in FY 2025/26 were constructed by The Preserve developer in accordance with approved project plans and, except for the three (3) roundabouts on Faria Preserve Parkway, have been transferred to the City. The transferred improvements include landscaping, irrigation, hardscape, a walking path, and related features along Faria Preserve Parkway, a section of Bollinger Canyon Road, and a section of Omega Road. The timing of the roundabout transfer was delayed due to development traffic and acceptance is dependent on the developer’s schedule, but the majority of the improvements were accepted for ownership and maintenance by the City in FY 2024/25.

Cost of Maintenance
The initial cost of maintenance, the annualized replacement cost of improvements, and the cost of administration of the District were estimated as presented in the Engineer’s Report that was prepared for the formation of the District.

Anticipated expenditures for FY 2025/26 are based on FY 2024/25 maintenance costs, the inspection of the already accepted areas, and quotes from contractors to complete certain maintenance activities. The estimated costs and budget are summarized below:

8.1 Packet Pg. 76

DESCRIPTION COSTS
Annual Operation, Maintenance and Replacement Costs $159,209 Less: General Benefit Contribution (7.92%) (12,609)
Total Assessable Direct Costs $146,600
Incidental Costs (Tax Roll Fees and Administration) $8,500 Total Maximum Costs that can be Assessed $155,100
Assessment
The initial maximum assessment for the District was set at $363.13 per benefit point. This can be adjusted by the greater of 2% or the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco Bay Area, All Urban Consumers. This year, the applicable inflation rate was 2.7%. Therefore, a 2.7% increase has been applied. The current maximum assessment that can be levied is $443.96. Single-family homes will be assessed one benefit point and townhome condominiums will be assessed 0.75 benefit points.

Not all of the actual costs may be assessed. A certain fraction of the benefits of the improvements is deemed to be of general benefit to the community as a whole and is not assessable. Analysis done for the original Engineer’s Report determined that this benefit was

7.92%. Therefore, the total cost to be assessed for FY 2025/26 is equal to 92.08% of the $159,209 annual costs, or $146,600, plus fees and administration costs for a total of $155,100.

All the units to be constructed as part of The Preserve project will be assessable in FY 2025/26.

This totals 524 benefit points that will be assessed at an assessment rate of $295.99 and will result in revenue of $155,100 to fund maintenance and replacement costs for FY 2025/26.

Future Reserve Study Update
As the roundabouts are accepted for maintenance by the City, actual costs of maintenance and administration will be updated. In addition, appropriate reserves for non-routine maintenance and replacement of improvements will be accumulated. The amount of money that needs to be expended in any given year and the required reserves will be tracked and presented to the Finance Committee and City Council in annual updates to a Reserve Fund Study and the annual Engineer’s Report.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
The Engineer’s Report will be the basis for the assessment of parcels located within the District.

The associated costs, as well as revenues from this levy, will be included in the proposed FY 2025/26 Operating Budget and Capital Budget of the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program.

8.1 Packet Pg. 77

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Staff will file the final Engineer’s Report, together with the assessment roll and the assessment diagram, with the Contra Costa County Assessor’s Office by August 10, 2025.

ATTACHMENT
A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report

8.1 Packet Pg. 78
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-071

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON

CONFIRMING THE PRESERVE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT

DISTRICT DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENTS AND LEVYING THE PRESERVE

LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
WHEREAS, on March 11, 2025, the City Council of the City of San Ramon adopted Resolution No. 2025-028 describing new improvements for The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (District) and ordering the District Engineer to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report for FY 2025/26; and
WHEREAS, the District Engineer filed the Engineer’s Report and on May 27, 2025, the City Council of the City of San Ramon adopted Resolution No. 2025-051 approving the FY 2025/26 District Engineer's Report and associated assessment diagram, adopting a Resolution of Intention to levy and collect assessments for FY 2025/26, and setting a public hearing for June 10, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a Public Hearing on June 10, 2025; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that the assessments have been spread in accordance with the special benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance, and services to be performed as set forth in the Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Ramon does hereby confirm The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting District diagram and assessments and levy The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting District assessments for FY 2025/26 as set forth in the Engineer’s Report.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the meeting of June 10, 2025, by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
________________________
Mark Armstrong, Mayor
ATTEST:

8.1 Packet Pg. 79
Christina Franco, City Clerk

8.1 Packet Pg. 80
Attachment A
ENGINEER’S REPORT
for

THE PRESERVE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2025 – JUNE 30, 2026

CITY OF SAN RAMON
Contra Costa County, California
June 10, 2025

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Transmittal .........................................................................................................................................3 Certification of Filing .........................................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION 4
IMPROVEMENTS 4
Location of District and Improvements ..........................................................................................4 Landscaping Program ......................................................................................................................4 Overhead............................................................................................................................................4 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 5
Annual Maintenance Cost Estimate...............................................................................................5 Annualized Replacement Cost Estimate.......................................................................................6 SPECIAL AND GENERAL BENEFIT 7
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................7 Identification of Benefit.....................................................................................................................7 Separation of General Benefit.........................................................................................................9 Quantification of General Benefit....................................................................................................9 Apportioning of Special Benefit.....................................................................................................11 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 15
Balance to be Assessed ................................................................................................................15 Maximum Annual Assessment Amount per
Benefit Point and Annual Increase to the Maximum Annual Assessment .............................15 Method of Assessment Spread.....................................................................................................16 Total Maximum Assessment per Property Type ........................................................................16 ACTUAL ASSESSMENT TO BE LEVIED 16
ASSESSMENT ROLL 17
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 18

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve) 3 Transmittal
I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Engineer’s Report, and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, the Engineer’s Report, Assessments, and the Assessment Diagram herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of San Ramon and the Assessment Law.

Chen-hsuan Hsieh
District Engineer
R.C.E. 68052 (Expires 09/30/25)
Certification of Filing
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on the day of 2025.

Christina Franco, City Clerk
City of San Ramon
Contra Costa County, California
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of San Ramon, California, on the day of 2025.

Christina Franco, City Clerk
City of San Ramon
Contra Costa County, California

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve) 4 INTRODUCTION
This Assessment Engineer’s Report that separates and quantifies the special and general benefits and assesses the proportional special benefit to fund a proposed landscaping program containing decorative planting, irrigation, minor hardscaping, a walking path and pedestrian improvements within the proposed The Preserve Landscape and Lighting Assessment District (hereafter referred to as the “District”). Article XIID Section 4 of the Constitution of the State of California (“Proposition 218”) and recent court rulings have made clear the importance of separating and quantifying the special and general benefits and supporting that quantification with evidence and analysis.

IMPROVEMENTS
Location of District and Improvements
The District will provide ongoing funding for a landscaping program containing decorative planting, irrigation, hardscaping, a walking path and pedestrian improvements. The proposed District area was annexed into the City by LAFCO Resolution 08-27 on February 11, 2009. The Faria Preserve is generally located north of Deerwood Drive and Deerwood Road, east of Bollinger Canyon Road and west of Omega Road.

The improvements are located along Faria Preserve Parkway, a section of Bollinger Canyon Road, and a section of Omega Road.

The Preserve project plans containing detailed information as to the exact description and location of the improvements are on file with the City. All improvements to be maintained by the District are located in the public right of way and exclude those fences, gates, screen walls and existing retaining walls on Faria Preserve Parkway and those improvements to be maintained by The Preserve Home Owners Association(s) and those elements to be maintained by the Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1.

Landscaping Program
The Landscaping Program provides year-round maintenance and management services. Landscape improvements include trees, shrubs and decorative plantings together with an irrigation system containing controllers, valves and booster pumps. Hardscape improvements include decorative paving, retaining walls and a DG walking path. The walking path improvements include sitting benches, trash receptacles and drinking fountains.

Services include routine maintenance of the landscape and hardscape improvements. Landscape services include pruning, trimming, irrigation, fertilization, repair and replacement of the improvements. Hardscape services include repair, painting, cleaning, graffiti removal, replacement of the improvements, regular trash removal and all utilities.

The landscaping will be installed in order to create a common theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District.

Overhead
In addition to the costs to maintain and service the District improvements mentioned above, the City will incur costs for staff time and expense related to the programs mentioned above, as well as the management of the District. Staff time includes oversight and coordination of both City and contractor provided services, annual tax roll preparation, and addressing property owner questions and concerns. These activities are directly related to the District and improvements within the District, and without them, the improvements could not be efficiently completed or properly maintained on an ongoing basis.

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve) 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements as described in the previous section are summarized below. Each year, as part of the assessment district levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed, and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year.

Annual Maintenance Cost Estimate
The table below estimates the cost of the annual maintenance and servicing of all of the improvements in 2025 dollars. The estimated costs of maintenance have been established based on previous years' actual costs and quotes provided by contractors. Future costs will depend on the amount and timing of the turnover of improvements to the District and the type, amount, and cost basis of work at the time. This table may be adjusted as updated data becomes available.

Item Cost
Staff $35,335.00
Contractors $26,046.00
Utilities $20,700.00
Materials $1,500.00
Yard and miscellaneous $15,530.00
TOTAL ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST $94,111.00

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve) 6 Annualized Replacement Cost Estimate
The table below estimates the annualized replacement cost in 2025 dollars of the improvements calculated over the service life of each item. The annualized replacement cost ensures funding availability for major landscape and irrigation repairs including hardscape and other amenities within The Preserve. If any adjustments are required, there are sufficient reserves available to provide for any likely adjustments.

*FY 2024/25 Costs
Total Annual Maintenance and Replacement Cost
The cost below includes annual maintenance costs and estimated annualized replacement costs.

TOAL ANNUALIZED REPLACEMENT COST $65,097.58
TOTAL ANNUAL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COST $94,111
TOTAL $159,208.58
*Cost per
Unit Life Years Cost
Landscaping $5.50 20 $39,039.77
Trees $611.36 30 $5,298.49
Irrigation Booster Pumps $79,477.36 30 $2,649.25
Irrigation Controllers $5,502.28 10 $1,650.68
Remote Control Valves $489.09 20 $3,668.19
Wall Replacement $91.70 75 $2,046.85
Decorative Paving $14.67 20 $1,422.03
DG Path $14.67 15 $7,785.36
Bench $978.18 10 $195.64
Trash Cans $1,204.39 10 $240.88
Drinking Fountain $5,502.28 10 $1,100.46
$65,097.58
Estimated Annualized Replacement Cost

TOTAL ANNUALIZED REPLACEMENT COST

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve) 7 SPECIAL AND GENERAL BENEFIT
Introduction
Pursuant to Article XIIID, all parcels that receive a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the public improvements shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the project. Furthermore, Article XIIID requires that the City separate the general benefit from special benefit, so that only the special benefit may be assessed.

Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties within an assessment district must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Examples of parcels which might be exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts, public parks and parkways and open space areas. At this time, there are parcels expected to develop within the District that would be exempt from the assessment, as they are planned public streets, open space, and park areas, which receive no special benefit from the improvements.

Identification of Benefit
The operation and maintenance of the improvements and necessary related administrative expenses the City will incur in obtaining and managing maintenance services will provide benefits to both those properties within the boundary of the District and to the community as a whole. The benefits conferred to property within the boundary of the District from the public improvements are described below. This report does not consider any general enhancement of property value.

AESTHETIC BENEFITS
Aesthetics, or the beautification of property, is a primary component of livability. Livability encompasses several qualities and characteristics that are unique to a specific area. The Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011) expands on the concept of livability and the various benefits associated with that designation:
“The livability of an area increases property desirability and business activity. Livability is largely affected by conditions in the public realm, places where people naturally interact with each other and their community, including streets, parks, transportation terminals and other public facilities.

Livability also refers to the environmental and social quality of an area as perceived by employees, customers and visitors. This includes local environmental conditions, the quality of social interactions, opportunities for recreation and entertainment, aesthetics, and existence of unique cultural and environmental resources.”
The maintenance and servicing of the improvements increases the aesthetics, appearance and desirability of properties within the proposed boundaries of the District. The overall appeal of the District is enhanced when improvements are in place and kept in a healthy and satisfactory condition.

The maintenance of the improvements will provide and create a cohesive community identity that will serve to improve the livability within and helps define a positive urban character with the visual features of a destination community. This encourages the enjoyment of the neighborhood as well as promotes the maximum use of each area.

Conversely, appeal decreases when improvements are not well maintained, unsafe, or destroyed by the elements or vandalism. Upgraded and maintained amenities will enhance the appearance, desirability and “livability” of the property throughout the District.

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve) 8 PEDESTRIAN BENEFITS
Walking paths will be maintained and free from trash. These routinely maintained sidewalks will provide a year-round, aesthetically pleasing environment that will encourage pedestrian activity.

Regular maintenance and repair ensures that the improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties adjacent to or in close proximity to the improvements within the proposed District. According to the Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011), streetscapes have a significant effect on how people view and interact with their community. With streetscapes that are safe and inviting, people are more likely to walk, which can help reduce automobile traffic, improve public health and attract residents to the community.

Maintained walking improvements will enhance the local identity of the District, which will lead to a stronger and healthier community. The walking improvements including benches, water fountains and trash receptacles will establish continuity throughout the district. The walking improvements also provide an additional means to enjoy the landscaping improvements.

A survey conducted by DMB (an Arizona based commercial developer) found that there was a strong demand for communities characterized by pedestrian access, a sense of connection, and a sense of community and diversity (Urban Land Institute, 2006). According to the Urban Land Institute report “Creating Walkable Places: Compact Mixed-Use Solutions”, people want their neighborhoods to provide more opportunities to walk (Urban Land Institute, 2006). A survey sponsored by the Surface Transportation Policy Project found that 55% of respondents would like to walk more, 63% would like to run errands on foot and walk to stores, and 79% would like sidewalks and other places to walk and exercise (Urban Land Institute, 2006). The installation of the interconnecting sidewalks improves the livability and appeal for the properties.

SECURITY AND SAFETY BENEFITS
A recent study has found that after landscape improvements were installed, there was a 46% decrease in crash rates across urban arterial and highway sites and a second study reviewed found a 5% to 20% reduction in mid-block crashes after trees and planters in urban arterial roads were put in place. In addition, there is less graffiti, vandalism, and littering in outdoor spaces with natural landscapes than in comparable plant-less spaces (Wolf, 2010). As residents are active in their neighborhoods there is a proportional reduction in crime as these neighborhoods become more cohesive, self-aware, and self-policing.

Further, by including landscaping in the central portion of streets, this will discourage pedestrians from cutting across the streets and encourage the use of designated pedestrian crossings. The Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011) has found that streetscapes reduce traffic speeds, and when combined with improved pedestrian crossing conditions, can significantly reduce collisions.

According to the Federal Highway Administration (“FHWA”), sidewalks and walking trails reduce roadway accidents, including pedestrian/motor vehicle accidents. In addition, roadways without sidewalks are more than twice as likely to have pedestrian involved accidents compared to sites with sidewalks on both sides of the street (FHWA, n.d.). In 2008, the National Traffic Safety Administration’s (“NHTSA”) National Pedestrian Crash Report identified California as one of the states with the highest number of pedestrian deaths (NHTSA, 2008).

The maintained improvements will provide an increased level of safety to the property, residents, and visitors to the District. Convenient and safe pedestrian access is a critical component to the establishment of a community. Well-maintained and clean sidewalks and walking trails provide a separation between vehicle and pedestrian as well as property and pedestrian, which provides a safety benefit for both property and pedestrian. Safety for pedestrians involves not only a degree of protection from vehicular accidents, but also from criminal activity. Well-maintained areas mitigate crime, especially vandalism, and enhance pedestrian and vehicular safety.

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve) 9 The U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA, n.d.) notes that annually, around 4,500 pedestrians are killed in traffic crashes with motor vehicles in the United States. Pedestrians killed while "walking along the roadway" account for almost 8 percent of those deaths. Providing safe walkways separated from the travel lanes could help to prevent up to 88 percent of these "walking along roadway” crashes.

Separation of General Benefit
Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred,” and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. A general benefit is an overall and similar benefit to the public at large resulting from the maintenance and operation of the improvements to be provided by the assessments levied.

The maintenance of the improvements will provide improved aesthetic, pedestrian and safety benefits to property within the District, but it is recognized that the maintenance activities will also provide a level of benefit to some property within proximity to the District, as well as visitors and individuals passing through the District. This is considered to be a general benefit that cannot be funded by District assessments.

Pedestrian and vehicular traffic from property within and outside of the District, as well as individuals passing through the District area will utilize and enjoy the maintained improvements. Therefore, the general benefit created as a result of District maintenance activities must be considered.

The maintenance of the improvements will also provide a level of improved aesthetic, pedestrian and safety benefits to pedestrians and vehicles that will travel through the District to access properties outside of the District boundaries. Further, non-resident pedestrians may take advantage of the clean and safe areas and incorporate the area into their fitness routine as part of the overall route travelled. These activities create general benefit that is required to be separated and quantified as shown below.

Quantification of General Benefit
The amount of general benefit that is provided from the District activities cannot be funded via property owner assessments within the District. In order for property within the District to be assessed only for that portion of special benefit received from the District maintenance and service activities, general benefits provided by the ongoing maintenance of the improvements needs to be quantified.

The District is projected to consist of a variety of property land uses, including 296 single family residential parcels, 304 condominium units, a house of worship and approximately 220 acres used for non-residential purposes, including open space, recreational and public property. Properties within the District are classified to a land use category according to the assigned land use code as shown on the County Assessor’s latest secured property tax roll.

As a result of the maintenance activities, there will be a level of general benefit to traffic and/or pedestrians that do not live in or intend to conduct business within the District. This general benefit, serving as a passthrough corridor or destination for traffic and/or pedestrians, needs to be quantified. The identified benefits provided by the maintenance of the improvements include beautification of the area, pedestrian benefits and security/safety benefits. Each of these benefits must be considered and quantified.

General Benefit Portion of Improved Aesthetic Benefits
The automotive traffic, generated from property outside of the District, which may pass though the District and enjoy the maintained improvements must be estimated. The AECOM Final Transportation Impact Analysis was prepared in August 2013 for the Faria Preserve project (the “Traffic Study”).

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve) 10 The Traffic Study analyzed trips generated by the Faria development and the impact of those trips on the surrounding transportation infrastructure. The Traffic Study projected trips generated by the Faria project and trips generated by the non-project area to estimate the total trip loads on selected intersections. By comparing the Project Trip Assignments with the Cumulative (2030) Plus Project Intersection Traffic Volumes and Geometry, it was found that no through traffic was calculated to pass through the Faria development. However, the Traffic Study was in the eastbased upon a roadway configuration that differs from the current development plan. The difference is that the Eastern connection of Faria Parkway formerly connected to Deerwood Road (Intersection “A”), and now Faria Preserve Parkway connects to Bollinger Canyon Road at the west end and San Ramon Valley Boulevard at the east end. To allow for potential through traffic trips due to the roadway configuration change, it is estimated that 5% of the total traffic trips passing the improvements will be from sources outside the District (through and/or destination traffic) and thereby will enjoy an aesthetic benefit from their maintenance.

General Benefit Portion of Improved Pedestrian Benefits The pathways connect the neighborhoods with open space and park areas. The walking paths create recreational and fitness opportunities as well as develop a sense of community. There will be pedestrian traffic, generated from property outside of the District, which may utilize the maintained walking paths in the District and access property located outside of the District boundaries. Pedestrians may also incorporate the walking paths into their leisure and fitness routines, thus making the District walking paths serve as a pass-through portion of their overall route travelled.

The park and open space associated with the Faria development will draw people from outside the district who will enjoy the pedestrian benefits. The walking paths maintained by the District are a subset of the entire sidewalk, walking path and foot trail system planned for the Faria development open space and park parcels.

The 13.6-acre park associated with the Faria development is approximately 3.3% of the City’s total park acreage. The 190 acres of open space is approximately 8.2 % of the City’s total open space area. The location of the project area is distant from the residential core of the City and as evidenced by the Traffic Study, minimal through-traffic is anticipated to travel through the area. However, as a pedestrian recreational destination area, there is an expectation of a higher percentage of out of District pedestrian use relative to total pedestrian use. The out of District (General Benefit) percentage of use is estimated at 1/8 or 12.5% of pedestrians enjoying the District improvements.

General Benefit Portion of Improved Security &Safety Benefits The improvements will provide improved security and safety to persons and property. The identified benefits to property (reduced graffiti, vandalism and littering) are localized and therefore limited to the property within the District. 0.0% General Benefit is estimated to accrue to property outside the District. The safety and security general benefit to persons is proportional to the pedestrian benefit estimated for those outside the District, or 12.5%. The General Benefit for persons and property are averaged to produce an estimated General Benefit of 6.25% for improved security and safety.

Collective District-wide General Benefit
Since the District is comprised of improved aesthetics, pedestrian and increased safety and security benefits resulting from a blend of improvements, the activity of both pedestrians and vehicles must be addressed in a collective form rather than independently. Therefore, the average of the general benefit percentages has been used to quantify the overall level of general benefit for the District. This general benefit result is provided in the table below:

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve) 11 General Benefit Quantification
Benefit Measurement Estimated Based Upon General Benefit % Aesthetics Trip Generation
Total traffic trips to or through the
District, which originate out of District. 5.00%
Pedestrian
Persons using walking
improvements Walking path use from outside district 12.50% Security &
Safety
Persons using walking
improvements Walking path use from outside district 12.50% Property distance
from improvements Distance from improvements 0.00%
Average Security & Safety 6.25% 6.25%
Total Averaged General Benefit 7.92%
The general benefit, which is the percentage of the total budget (excluding District administrative costs), that must be funded through sources other than assessments is 7.92%. The special benefit then, which is the percentage of the budget that may be funded by assessments, is 92.08%.

Apportioning of Special Benefit
As outlined in Section 5.2, each of the parcels within the District receives a special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it, as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements, is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements.

The total costs of maintenance and operation, less the amount of general benefit identified, will be assessed to the parcels within the District based on the benefit points assigned to each parcel. This Section provides a detailed breakdown of the assigned benefit points described herein. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate parcels of different land use, intensity of use, size, location, and proximity to improvements. The City has a well-established Assessment Factoring Methodology that has considered the proportional benefit received by all property types in the City for landscaping and lighting improvements.

Each parcel’s land use is a factor that differentiates parcels based on the benefit received from the improvements within the District. Parcels with residential land use are the basis for assigning benefit points for the maintenance and service activities.

Common areas, roads and easements are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive benefit from the increased aesthetics, security and safety or pedestrian benefits. Utility parcels are also deemed to not benefit from the maintenance of the improvements.

The following table provides the benefit points assigned to each land use category of parcels within the District.

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve) 12 STREET LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING BENEFIT UNIT FACTORS
Land Use Use Code*
Aesthetic
Points
Pedestrian
Points
Security & Safety
Points
Total
Points
Single Family 11-19 .375 .25 .375 1.00
Condominium 29 .250 .25 .250 .75
Multiple Residential (including hotels, motels)
Units:

Two 21 .50 .50 .50 1.50
Three 22 .75 .75 .75 2.25
Four 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00
Five 24 1.25 1.25 1.25 3.75
6 - 12 25 2.50 2.50 2.50 7.50
13– 24 26 4.50 4.50 4.50 13.50
25 - 59 27 5.00 10.00 5.00 20.00
60 – 80 28 8.75 17.50 8.75 35.00
81 - 100 28 11.25 22.50 11.25 45.00
101 - 200 28 18.75 37.50 18.75 75.00
201 - 400 28 37.50 75.00 37.50 150.00
401 - 600 28 62.50 125.00 62.50 250.00
601 - 800 28 87.50 175.00 87.50 350.00
801 - 1,000 28 112.00 225.00 112.50 450.00
etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.

Industrial 50 - 59
Assessment based on frontage and total area of the parcel – see tables below Commercial 29 - 49
Institutional 70 - 79
Industrial
Frontage (ft) Points Parcel Area (ft2) Parcel Area (ac) Points 0 - 200 4 0 - 25,000 0.00 - 0.57 4
201 - 500 12 25,000- 100,000 0.58 - 2.29 12
501 - 1,000 24 100,001 - 250,000 2.30 - 5.79 24
1,001+ 36 250,001 + 5.80 + 36
Commercial &
Institutional
Frontage (ft) Points Parcel Area (ft2) Parcel Area (ac) Points 0 - 200 4 0 - 5,000 0.00 -0.11 4
201 - 500 8 5,001 - 10,000 0.12 - 0.22 8
501 - 1,000 12 10,001 - 25,000 0.23 - 0.58 12
1,001 - 3,000 16 25,001 - 100,000 0.59 -·2.29 16
3,001 - 5,000 24 100,001 - 500,000 2.30 - 11.49 24
5,001+ 36 500,001 + 11.50 + 36
*The Use Code is the designation used by the County Assessor's Office to indicate how the land is being used

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve) 13 Total Special Benefit Points Calculation
The formula below shows the total special benefit points calculation for each parcel within the District:

Parcel’s Total
Special Benefit
Points
=
Parcel’s Aesthetic
Benefit Points +
Parcel’s
Pedestrian Benefit
Points
+
Parcel’s Safety
Benefit Points
Data Considerations and Parcel Changes
The use of the latest Assessor’s Secured Roll information has been and shall be used in the future as the basis in determining each parcel’s land use category and acreage, unless better data was or is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number, the land use category, residential dwelling units, and acreage of the subsequent valid parcels shall serve as the basis in assigning parcel factor special benefit points.

Special Considerations: Publicly Owned Parcels
Any publicly owned parcels that benefit from the improvements cannot be exempt from the assessment.

The special benefits accruing to these types of parcels must be determined using the same kind of formulas and benefit point assignment as applied to privately owned parcels. This requirement is clearly conveyed in Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution, which states in part, “... Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit.” No publicly owned parcels have been categorized and assigned benefit units using the same methodology as privately owned parcels, based on their land use as shown on the County Assessor’s latest secured property tax roll.

Benefit Units per Property Type
The following table calculates the Benefit Units for each Property Type by proposed Neighborhood.

Neighborhood Land Use Count
Aesthetic
Points
Pedestrian
Points
Security &
Safety
Points
Benefit
Points
I Single Family 121 0.375 0.250 0.375 1.000
II Single Family 72 0.375 0.250 0.375 1.000
III
Courtyard
Single Family 63 0.375 0.250 0.375 1.000
IV
Condo -
Townhomes 104 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.750
Condo - 2
Story Flats 78 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.750
V
Single Family 40 0.375 0.250 0.375 1.000
Condo 122 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.750
TOTALS 600

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve) 14 Total Benefit Unit Calculation
The following table calculates the Total Benefit Units in the District by proposed Neighborhood.

Neighborhood Land Use Count
Benefit
Points per
Use
Total Benefit
Points
I Single Family 121 1.000 121.00
II Single Family 72 1.000 72.00
III
Courtyard Single
Family 63 1.000 63.00
IV
Condo -
Townhomes 104 0.750 78.00
Condo - 2 Story
Flats 78 0.750 58.50
V
Single Family 40 1.000 40.00
Condo 122 0.750 91.50
TOTALS 600 524

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve) 15 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
Balance to be Assessed
It is anticipated that approximately all of the improvements will be completed and accepted by the end of the fiscal year. Therefore, the estimated annual maintenance and replacement costs budgeted reflect ownership of all of the improvements for most of the year.

The general benefit, which is the percentage of the total budget, excluding incidental costs, which must be funded through sources other than assessments, is 7.92% of the total project cost. The special benefit, which is the percentage of the budget that may be funded by assessments, is 92.08%.

Description
Budget
Amount
Estimated Annual Maintenance and Replacement Costs $159,209 Less: General Benefit Contribution (7.92%) ($12,609)
Total Assessable Direct Costs $146,600
Incidental Costs (Tax Roll Fees and Administration) $8,500 Total Maximum Costs that can be Assessed $155,100
Total Annual Cost (Maintenance, Replacement, Incidental Costs) $167,709 Maximum Annual Assessment Amount per Benefit Point and Annual Increase to the Maximum Annual Assessment
The assessment per benefit point was calculated at the time of formation of the District by dividing the total estimated costs to be assessed by the total benefit points assigned to the parcels within the District.

The maximum initial annual assessment was determined to be = $363.13 As of June 1 of each fiscal year after the base year (2018/2019), the maximum annual assessment (the “Maximum Annual Assessment”) shall be increased by the greater of 2% or the February Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco Bay Area, All Urban Consumers. It is specifically provided that the Maximum Annual Assessment shall be increased each fiscal year, computed on the previous fiscal year’s Maximum Annual Assessment. The actual annual assessment levied in any fiscal year may be less than, but shall not exceed the Maximum Annual Assessment, unless appropriate proceedings are conducted by the District to authorize any increase beyond the Maximum Annual Assessment. The applicable inflation rate for this year’s assessment is 2.7%. Therefore, a 2.7% increase has been applied.

The Maximum Annual Assessment levied in FY 2024/25 was $432.29 per Benefit Point.

The Maximum Annual Assessment that may be levied in FY 2025/2026 is $443.96 per Benefit Point.

The special benefit analysis and assignment of benefit points has been calculated in relation to the total costs to be assessed. No assessment will be imposed on any parcel that exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on the parcel.

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve) 16 Method of Assessment Spread
The method of assessment is based upon a formula that assigns the special benefit to each parcel. The formulas below provide a summary of the assessment calculation for each parcel within the District.

Parcel’s Total
Special Benefit
Points
=
Parcel’s Aesthetic
Benefit Points +
Parcel’s
Pedestrian Benefit
Points
+
Parcel’s Safety
Benefit Points
Parcel’s Total
Assessment =
Assessment Rate
per Benefit Point x
Parcel’s Total
Benefit Points
Total Maximum Assessment per Property Type
The following table shows the Maximum Annual Assessment per property type by Neighborhood.

Neighborhood Land Use Benefit
Points
Maximum
Annual
Assessment
I Single Family 1.000 $443.96
II Single Family 1.000 $443.96
III Courtyard Single Family 1.000 $443.96
IV
Condo - Townhomes 0.750 $332.97
Condo - 2 Story Flats 0.750 $332.97
V
Single Family 1.000 $443.96
Condo 0.750 $332.97

ACTUAL ASSESSMENT TO BE LEVIED
The actual assessment to be levied is based on the Estimate of Costs, Special and General Benefit and Method of Assessment. For Fiscal Year 2025/26, the total estimated maximum assessable costs are $155,100. It is anticipated that 524 benefit points will be assessable as of June 30, 2025. Therefore, the per unit assessment will be $295.99 per benefit point (in order to avoid charging more than the estimated costs) with a total anticipated assessment of $155,100. .

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve) 17 ASSESSMENT ROLL
The following is a summary of information included in the Assessment Roll that because of its bulk is filed separately with the City Clerk. According to the Landscaping and Lighting Act, the information must include a listing of all parcels of land within the assessment district. Each parcel must be listed by its distinctive designation, a description of the parcel, and the proposed assessment on the parcel in proportion to the estimated benefit it receives from the improvement. This is done in the following format:

Property Description Property Description FY 2025-26
(Assessor's Parcel #) (Assessor's Description) Assessment Total Assessment: $155,100
The lines and dimensions of each parcel are as shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County of Contra Costa, which by reference is hereby made a part of this Report.

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve) 18 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
The Assessment Diagram is shown on this page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer’s Report.

8.1.a
Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: A - The Preserve Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Engineer’s Report (2025-071 : Public Hearing - L&L the Preserve)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 2025
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Brian Bornstein, Public Works Director
By: Gary Manuel, Landscape Program Manager
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-072 - Confirming the Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1984-1 Diagram and Assessments and Levying the Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1984-1 Assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/26

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 includes minor changes from the previous year. Staff is proposing assessment cap increases of 2% for Zones 1, 2, and 19 and 2.7% for Zone 4 in accordance with voter-approved methodology. Staff is proposing increases to the assessments levied for Zones 1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 10, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 to cover increasing costs. This public hearing is the final action required to confirm the assessment diagram and levy the assessments. The final Engineer’s Report, together with the assessment roll and the assessment diagram, will be filed with the Contra Costa County Assessor’s Office by August 10, 2025.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council conduct the Public Hearing and approve this Resolution confirming the Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1984-1 diagram and assessments and levying the Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1984-1 assessments for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1984-1 (District) was formed in 1984 and includes two (2) Citywide Zones and 17 Special Zones. Property owners within each Zone pay an annual assessment to fund the maintenance of public landscaping and street lighting within that Zone.

Such maintenance is performed through a combination of City staff and contractors.

The City conducts an annual process for its Landscaping & Lighting Districts to review past, current, and future expenses, ongoing and upcoming maintenance needs, needs for new capital improvement projects, and to set future assessments. To reestablish a Landscaping and Lighting District under the California Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Streets and Highways Code §22500 et seq.) (Act), a local agency must follow a structured legal process. The first step in this

8.2 Packet Pg. 99
process was completed on March 11, 2025, when the City Council approved Resolution No. 2025-029 describing new improvements and ordering the District Engineer to prepare and file the Engineer’s Report for FY 2025/26. The FY 2025/26 Engineer’s Report (Attachment A) is outlined by the Act as the second step necessary to re-establish the District.

The second step was completed by City Council on May 27, 2025, with the adoption of Resolution No. 2025-050 approving the FY 2025/26 Engineer’s Report, adopting a Resolution of Intention to levy and collect assessments for FY 2025/26, and setting a Public Hearing for June 10, 2025.

The final step required by the Act is to conduct a Public Hearing and adopt a Resolution confirming the diagram and assessments and levying the assessments for FY 2025/26. This allows staff to prepare the database of parcels and corresponding assessments to be included on the property tax roll, which must be submitted to the Contra Costa County Assessor's Office by August 10, 2025.

Recommended Assessment Changes and Items of Note for Zones in FY 2025/26 On May 21, 2025, the Finance Committee reviewed the Reserve Study and staff recommendations for the FY 2025/26 Engineer's Report, which included proposed upgrades, renovations, and increases/decreases of assessment rates. There will not be changes in the assessments for Zones 3, 6, 7, 8, 11, 13, and 14; other changes and related activities are described below.
• Zone 1 - Citywide Lighting - Increase the maximum assessment cap by allowable CPI (2%) from $35.27 to $35.98, and increase the assessment from $35.27 to $35.98, an increase of $0.71.
• Zone 2 - Citywide Landscaping - Increase the maximum assessment cap by allowable CPI (2%) from $76.21 to $77.73, and increase the assessment from $76.21 to $77.73, an increase of $1.52 per unit.
• Zone 4 - Vista San Ramon - Increase the maximum assessment cap by the current CPI (2.7%) from $394 to $405 and decrease the assessment from $394 to $300 per unit, a decrease of $94 per unit.
• Zone 5 - Summerwood Loop - Increase the assessment from $120 to $130 per unit, an increase of $10 per unit (maximum Zone 5 assessment rate is $160). • Zone 9 - Country View - Increase the assessment from $0 to $80 per unit, an increase of $80 per unit (maximum Zone 9 assessment rate is $100).
• Zone 10 - Old Ranch Estates - Increase the assessment from $350 to $380 per unit, an increase of $30 per unit (maximum Zone 10 assessment rate is $380). • Zone 12 - El Nido - Increase the assessment from $110 to $125 per unit, an increase of $15 per unit (maximum Zone 12 assessment rate is $125).
• Zone 15 - Circle E - Increase the assessment from $225 to $235 per unit, an increase of $10 per unit (maximum Zone 15 assessment rate is $300).
• Zone 16 - Thomas Ranch - Increase the assessment from $75 to $85 per unit, an increase of $10 per unit (maximum Zone 16 assessment rate is $100).

8.2 Packet Pg. 100
• Zone 17 - Henry Ranch - Increase the assessment from $225 to $275 per unit, an increase of $50 per unit (maximum Zone 17 assessment rate is $375). • Zone 18 - Old Ranch Summit - Increase the assessment from $350 to $400 per unit, an increase of $50 per unit (maximum Zone 18 assessment rate is $1,858). • Zone 19 - Glass House - Increase the maximum assessment cap by allowable CPI (2%) and increase the assessment rate from $15,802 to $16,118, an increase of $316 (maximum Zone 19 assessment rate is $16,118).

Underfunded Zones
The FY 2025/26 Reserve Study identifies that the following nine (9) Zones are estimated to have negative fund balances within the next ten (10) years unless service levels are reduced, assessment rates are increased, or property owners approve increases to their maximum assessments. Six (6) of the nine (9) Zones are at their maximum assessment rate. Thomas Ranch (Zone 16) is not at its maximum assessment rate. Citywide Lighting (Zone 1) and Glass House (Zone 19) expenditures increase yearly at a rate higher than the allowable CPI 2% increase cap.

Zone Projected Negative Balance Year
Zone 1 - Citywide Lighting FY 2030/31
Zone 6 - West Branch* FY 2031/32
Zone 7 - Bent Creek* FY 2030/31
Zone 8 - Deerwood* FY 2031/32
Zone 11 - Village Parkway* FY 2033/34
Zone 12 - El Nido* FY 2031/32
Zone 14 - Four Oaks* FY 2030/31
Zone 16 - Thomas Ranch FY 2033/34
Zone 19 - Glass House FY 2032/33
*At Maximum Assessment Rate
Rising utility and contract costs are the main factors contributing to operational deficiencies.

Other contributing factors to increasing costs for all Zones are renovation and replacement of aging landscaping and irrigation infrastructure.

Public Outreach in FY 2025/26 - Potential Ballot Initiatives The FY 2025/26 Reserve Study shows that, at current assessment rates, West Branch (Zone 6) will achieve a negative fund balance in FY 2031/32. Public outreach efforts are detailed below.

West Branch (Zone 6)
The fund for West Branch is only solvent until FY 2030/31 due to savings in utility costs from the Step Fountain being out of operation. Public outreach to West Branch has begun in order to describe pending Zone expenditures related to fountain maintenance/repair and landscape

8.2 Packet Pg. 101
enhancement projects. Residents are currently being informed about ongoing maintenance and funding issues, as shown in the Reserve Study, to prepare for a possible Zone increase. Recent work in West Branch is limited to reactive landscape, irrigation, and fountain maintenance.

Planned work includes reactive irrigation repairs and replacing Reflection Fountain components such as tablet feeders, display pumps, and motors. This work is necessary to maintain the equipment and fountain infrastructure.

In March 2022, a valve failed in the equipment vault of the Step Fountain, and the equipment vault flooded. The motor and other electrical components were damaged and needed to be replaced. As described below under Capital Improvement Projects, the replacement cost for these components is expected to be approximately $110,000. Based on feedback from the Finance Committee, staff is prioritizing maintenance activities related to the Reflections Fountain and the development of alternative uses for the current Step Fountain site. After the initial outreach with some residents in West Branch, staff requested Gates and Associates, one of the City’s on-call Landscape Architecture consultants, to prepare landscape renderings of the Step Fountain site.

The renderings will be presented to West Branch residents during the follow-up outreach process. The initial estimate to renovate and transform the Step Fountain site into a landscaped area is approximately $685,000.

Improvements (Capital Improvement Projects)
Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs) are identified as new construction, replacement, and/or infrastructure renovation within each Zone that exceed annual operating expenses. The current five-year forecast for the CIP within each Zone is included in the Engineer's Report (Attachment A).

The following are the proposed new Zone-specific CIPs. There are no new CIPs for Zone 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 13, 14,17, and 18. Amounts shown represent the funding requests for FY 2025/26:

CIP 300001 - Citywide Lighting Zone Improvements - Zone 1 - $0 As part of the City Village - Summerhill Homes project (SD 9576), 11 new streetlamps will be installed on Norris Canyon Road, Camino Ramon, and Executive Parkway. Eleven existing streetlights will also be converted to LEDs. PG&E. will own all new streetlamp heads. All improvements will be constructed and paid for by the developer.

CIP 300002 - Citywide Landscaping Zone Improvements - Zone 2 - $26,000 Work for FY 2025/26 includes removal/replacement of declining trees, mulch installation, and landscape and irrigation renovations in various locations.

CIP 300003 - Canyon Lakes Zone Improvements - Zone 3 - $30,000 Work for FY 2025/26 includes removal/replacement of declining trees, mulch installation, and landscape and irrigation renovations in various locations.

CIP 300004 - Vista San Ramon Zone Improvements - Zone 4 - $6,800

8.2 Packet Pg. 102
Work for FY 2025/26 includes an irrigation controller and master valve upgrade.

CIP 300009 - Country View Zone Improvements - Zone 9 - $0 Work for FY 2025/26 includes supplemental landscape and irrigation not included in the Crow Canyon Road widening project using existing CIP funds.

CIP 300011 - Village Parkway Zone Improvements - Zone 11 - $1,000 Work for FY 2025/26 includes infill and replacement of dead or declining plants and trees.

CIP 300012 - El Nido Zone Improvements - Zone 12 - $1,000 Work for FY 2025/26 includes infill and replacement of dead or declining plants and trees.

CIP 300015 - Circle E Zone Improvements - Zone 15 - $3,000 Work for FY 2025/26 includes infill and replacement of dead or declining plants and trees.

CIP 300016 - Thomas Ranch Zone Improvements - Zone 16 - $1,000 Work for FY 2025/26 includes infill and replacement of dead or declining plants and trees.

CIP 300019 - Glass House Zone Improvements - Zone 19 - $1,000 Work for FY 2025/26 includes infill and replacement of dead and dying plants and trees CIP 300021 - Relamping - Zone 1- $0
There are no new improvement projects scheduled for FY 2025/26. There are sufficient parts available for re-lamping, so no new purchases are anticipated this fiscal year.

CIP 905530 - Bollinger Canyon Rd./Iron Horse Trail Bicycle Pedestrian Overcrossing - Zone 1 - $0
It is anticipated that the Bollinger Canyon Road at Iron Horse Trail Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing will include substantial safety lighting improvements on the bridge and its approaches. Work is expected to be completed by December 2025. There are no new improvement projects scheduled for FY 2025/26.

New Development
As part of the City Village - Summerhill Homes project (SD 9576), a total of 11 new streetlamps will be installed on Norris Canyon Road, Camino Ramon, and Executive Parkway. Eleven existing streetlights will also be converted to LEDs. All new streetlamp heads will be owned by PG&E. All improvements will be constructed and paid for by the developer.

FISCAL ANALYSIS
Following is a summary of the FY 2025/26 District Budget, as approved:

8.2 Packet Pg. 103
FY 2023/24 FY 2024/25 FY 2024/25 FY 2025/26
Actuals Adopted Revised Proposed
Citywide Lighting - Zone 1
Assessment Revenues 938,241 820,333 935,202 954,028
Revenues - Other (interest, rebates,
reimbursed expenses, return
funding 56,894 - - -
Assessment Collection Fees 24,008 21,158 21,158 21,158
Operating Expenses 940,274 1,008,208 1,075,282 1,083,855 Improvement Projects 98,000 - - -
Reserve Increase (Decrease) (67,147) (209,033) (161,238) (150,985) Reserve Balance $ 790,614 $ 519,897 $ 629,976 $ 478,991 Citywide Landscaping Zone 2
Assessment Revenues 2,009,491 1,781,071 1,896,200 1,934,020 Revenues - Other (interest, rebates,
reimbursed expenses, return
funding 60,670 12,209 12,209 12,209
Operating Expenses 1,282,390 1,453,353 1,453,353 1,498,587 Improvement Projects 111,150 88,500 97,500 38,840
Contribution to Special Zones 397,869 379,459 379,459 397,079 Reserve Increase (Decrease) 278,752 (128,032) (21,903) 11,723 Reserve Balance $ 828,314 $ 513,966 $ 797,668 $ 789,003 Special Assessment Zones
Assessment Revenues 868,878 1,130,320 1,155,096 1,176,388 Revenues - Other (interest, rebates,
reimbursed expenses, return
funding 257,431 87,787 145,355 92,656
Operating Expenses 1,246,474 1,562,694 1,571,874 1,659,459 Improvement Projects 181,850 85,500 106,500 30,960
Contribution from Citywide 416,895 379,460 388,460 397,079 Summary of Proposed FY 2025/26 Budget
The Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1984-1 budget is more fully described in the Engineer’s Report (Attachment A).

FY 2025/26 Landscaping & Lighting District Assessment Rates Staff is proposing assessment cap increases of 2.0% for Zones 1, 2, and 19, and 2.7% for Zone 4 in accordance with the voter-approved methodology. In addition, staff is proposing increases to the levied assessments for Zones 1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 10, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 for FY 2025/2026.

The FY 2025/26 Engineer’s Report will result in levying the following assessments for each Zone. FY 2025/26 rates are shown for comparison purposes:

8.2 Packet Pg. 104
Zone
Number Zone Name
Proposed
Unit
Factors
FY 2024/25
Levied Rate
Per Unit
FY 2025/26
Proposed
Rate Per
Unit
FY 2025/26 Max
Rate Per Unit
FY 2025/26
Estimated
Revenue
1 Citywide Street Lighting 26,515.50 35.27 35.98 35.98 954,028 2 Citywide Landscaping 24,881.25 76.21 77.73 77.73 1,934,020 3 Canyon Lakes 3,011.75 80 80 110 240,940
4 Vista San Ramon 161 394 300 405 48,300
5 Summerwood Loop 421 120 130 160 54,730
6 West Branch 631.75 380 380 380 240,065
7 Bent Creek 452 445 445 445 201,140
8 Deerwood 639 115 115 115 73,485
9 Country View 184 - 80 100 14,720
10 Old Ranch Estates 136 350 380 380 51,680
11 Village Parkway 241 110 110 110 26,510
12 El Nido 158 110 125 125 19,750
13 Crown Ridge 104 780 780 1,000 81,120
14 Four Oaks 59 175 175 175 10,325
15 Circle E 153 225 235 300 35,955
16 Thomas Ranch 140 75 85 100 11,900
17 Henry Ranch 102 225 275 375 28,050
18 Old Ranch Summit 54 350 400 1,858 21,600
Glass House (SR) 1 8,327.66 8,494.21 8,494.21
Brave Church (CH) 1 1,358.98 1,386.16 1,386.16
Valley Vista (VV) 1 6,115.38 6,237.69 6,237.69
4,064,435
*The owners of the three Zone 19 parcels were responsible for paying the Zone 1 and Zone 2 assessments prior to the formation of Zone 19. Therefore, these three parcels are included in the Zone 1 and Zone 2 unit factors and revenue estimates above, in addition to the Zone 19 assessment and revenue estimates. *SR - City of San Ramon, CH - Brave Church, VV - Valley Vista Senior Housing

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENTS

ASSESSMENT PER UNIT FACTOR BY SPECIAL ZONE
19* 16,118.05
Total Assessment Revenue:

8.2 Packet Pg. 105
Per Unit FY
2024/25
Per Unit FY
2025/26
Per Unit
Change
$35.27 $35.98 $0.71
$191.48 $193.71 $2.23
$505.48 $413.71 -$91.77
$231.48 $243.71 $12.23
$491.48 $493.71 $2.23
$556.48 $558.71 $2.23
$226.48 $228.71 $2.23
$111.48 $193.71 $82.23
$461.48 $493.71 $32.23
$221.48 $223.71 $2.23
$221.48 $238.71 $17.23
$891.48 $893.71 $2.23
$286.48 $288.71 $2.23
$336.48 $348.71 $12.23
$186.48 $198.71 $12.23
$336.48 $388.71 $52.23
$461.48 $513.71 $52.23
$8,439.14 $8,607.92
$1,470.46 $1,499.87
$6,226.86 $6,351.40
$111.48 $113.71 $2.23
The Zone 1 and Zone 2 assessments for these parcels are accounted for separately from the Zone 19 assessments.

Therefore, no increase for Zone 1 and Zone 2 are showing under Zone 19.

Bishop Ranch Properties (Zone 1 only)
*Valley Vista (VV)(Zone 19)
*Brave Church (CH)(Zone 19)
*Glass House (SR)(Zone 19)
Old Ranch Summit (Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 18)
Henry Ranch (Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 17)
Thomas Ranch (Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 16)
Circle E (Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 15)
Four Oaks (Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 14)
Crown Ridge (Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 13)
El Nido (Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 12)
Village Parkway (Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 11)
$322.73
*SR - City of San Ramon, CH - Brave Church, VV - Valley Vista Senior Housing All Other Areas (Zone 1, Zone 2)

CUMULATIVE ASSESSMENTS
(Includes Citywide Zones and Special Zone)
Description
Canyon Lakes (Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 3)
Old Ranch Estates (Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 10)
Country View (Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 9)
Deerwood (Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 8)
Bent Creek (Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 7)
West Branch (Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 6)
Summerwood Loop (Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 5)
Vista San Ramon (Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 4)

8.2 Packet Pg. 106

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Staff will file the final Engineer's Report, together with the assessment roll and diagram, with the Contra Costa County Assessor's Office by August 10, 2025.

ATTACHMENT
A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report

8.2 Packet Pg. 107
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-072

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON CONFIRMING THE LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1984-1 DIAGRAM

AND ASSESSMENTS AND LEVYING THE LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1984-1 ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26
WHEREAS, on March 11, 2025, the City Council of the City of San Ramon adopted Resolution No. 2025-029 describing new improvements for Landscaping & Lighting District No.1984-1 (District) and ordering the District Engineer to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report for FY 2025/26; and
WHEREAS, the District Engineer filed the Engineer’s Report and on May 27, 2025, the City Council of the City of San Ramon adopted Resolution No. 2025-050 approving the FY 2025/26 District Engineer's Report and associated assessment diagram, adopting a Resolution of intention to levy and collect assessments for FY 2025/26, and setting a Public Hearing for June 10, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a Public Hearing on June 10, 2025; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that the assessments have been spread in accordance with the special benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance, and services to be performed as set forth in the Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of San Ramon does hereby confirm the Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1984-1 diagram and assessments and levy the Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1984-1 assessments for FY 2025/26 as set forth in the Engineer’s Report.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at the meeting of June 10, 2025, by the following votes:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_______________________
Mark Armstrong, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Christina Franco, City Clerk

8.2 Packet Pg. 108
(LL)

ENGINEER'S REPORT
for
LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1984-1

LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENT
FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2025 - JUNE 30, 2026

CITY OF SAN RAMON
Contra Costa County, California
June 10, 2025

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) 2 ENGINEER'S REPORT
for
LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1984-1

LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENT
FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2025 - JUNE 30, 2026

TABLE OF CONTENTS
CERTIFICATION OF FILING.......................................................................................................3 I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................5 II. District Purpose and Service Levels..................................................................................5 III. Assessment District Diagram .............................................................................................6 IV. Plans and Specifications for Improvements ......................................................................7 V. District Funding..............................................................................................................10 VI. Assessment Rates...........................................................................................................11 VII. Assessment Methodology................................................................................................13 VIII. Revenues and Expenditures............................................................................................19 IX. Assessment Roll ..............................................................................................................19 Appendices
Appendix A - City of San Ramon City Council Resolution No. 2025-029 Appendix B - Assessment District Diagram
Appendix C - Plans and Specifications for Improvements
Appendix D - Landscaping & Lighting District Guideline
Appendix E - Street Landscaping & Lighting Unit Factor
Appendix F - Revenues and Expenditures for Zones 1-19
Appendix G - Summary of Assessments

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
3 ENGINEER'S REPORT
LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1984-1
(Pursuant to the Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972)

CERTIFICATIONOFFILING
Chen-hsuan Hsieh, Engineer of Work of Assessment District No. 1984-1, City of San Ramon, Contra Costa County, California, makes this Report as directed by the City Council. The San Ramon Landscaping & Lighting Assessment District No. 1984-1 is intended to provide Landscaping & Lighting improvements within certain incorporated limits of the City and to levy and collect assessments sufficient to pay for those improvements. This Report is to reestablish the Assessment District and to levy the Assessment for the fiscal year July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026.

The improvements which are the subject of this Report are briefly described as follows:

The installation of landscaping, public lighting facilities and facilities appurtenant thereto or which are necessary or convenient for their maintenance or servicing, and the maintenance or servicing of the foregoing.

The improvements for FY 2025/26 will include servicing or maintenance, or both, of existing public lighting facilities and certain landscaping and the installation of new street lights and/or landscaping within the budgeted limits.

The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Engineer's Report as directed by the City Council.

Dated: , 2025 By:

Chen-hsuan Hsieh, P.E., District Engineer
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with me on August 10, 2025.

Christina Franco, City Clerk
City of San Ramon
Contra Costa County, California

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
4 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of San Ramon, California, on the ____ day of _____________, 2025.

Christina Franco, City Clerk
City of San Ramon
Contra Costa County, California
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Contra Costa on the ____ day of _____________, 2025.

Christina Franco, City Clerk
City of San Ramon
Contra Costa County, California

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
5 ENGINEER'S REPORT
for
LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1984-1

LEVY OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENT
FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2025 – JUNE 30, 2026
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of San Ramon Landscaping & Lighting District No.1984-1 (District) was formed in 1984 in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (Streets and Highways Code Section 22500 et seq).

The District has been reestablished each year thereafter. On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218, entitled the "Right to Vote on Taxes Act," which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution. Proposition 218 established new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. The City of San Ramon has taken the necessary steps to ensure that Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1984-1 is compliant with Proposition 218.

Per Section 22622 of the Streets and Highways Code, the City Council of the City of San Ramon adopted Resolution 2025-029 on March 11, 2025, which ordered the District Engineer to prepare and file an Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 and described new improvements for the District.

Resolution 2025-029 is included as Appendix A.

II. DISTRICT PURPOSE AND SERVICE LEVELS
The Landscaping & Lighting District No.1984-1 (District) provides for the maintenance of street landscaping and lighting. During FY 2004/05, the level of service was revised from FY 2003/04 to remove park maintenance from the District, since park maintenance is solely funded by the City's General Fund and not by the assessment collected by the District. The District provides services and maintains improvements as follows and as described in subdivision improvement plans, capital improvement plans, and prior Engineer's Reports on file with the City:

Street Landscaping and Lighting

1. Provide horticultural care to all improved landscaped areas: mowing of turf areas, edging of turf areas, tree pruning, fertilization, soil aeration, and dethatching of turf areas.

2. Provide a high level of maintenance, including weed abatement and trash and debris pickup along City streets and in improved landscaped areas.

3. Provide weed abatement of all non-landscaped medians and public right-of-way.

4. Replace dead and dying plants and maintain the appearance of landscaped areas.

5. Provide tree pruning service for ongoing maintenance of trees.

6. Maintain exterior of sound walls by replacing Bouquet Canyon stones whenever necessary.

7. Maintain the landscaping and lighting at the San Ramon Transit Center.

8. Provide maintenance and electricalservice forstreet lighting.

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
6 9. Quarterly inspection of streetlights for outages.

10. Provide safety training and necessary safety equipment and clothing to create a safe working environment.

11. Create renovation projects for existing landscaping and lighting features within the District.

III. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
The Assessment District Diagram (Appendix B) delineates the assessment district boundary and the assessment zones. The District is organized into 19 zones: two general maintenance zones (Zones 1 and 2) and 17 special zones (Zones 3 through 19). The District Engineer and Engineer of Work hereby finds that the properties within each special Zone receive approximately equal special benefit from the work and improvements within that special Zone. The zones are:

Zone 1 Citywide Lighting (excludes Dougherty Valley)1
Zone 2 Citywide Landscaping (excludes Dougherty Valley and Bishop Ranch)2 Zone 3 Canyon Lakes
Zone 4 Vista San Ramon
Zone 5 Summerwood Loop
Zone 6 West Branch
Zone 7 Bent Creek
Zone 8 Deerwood
Zone 9 Country View
Zone 10 Old Ranch Estates
Zone 11 Village Parkway
Zone 12 El Nido
Zone 13 Crown Ridge
Zone 14 Four Oaks/Stevens
Zone 15 Circle E
Zone 16 Thomas Ranch
Zone 17 Henry Ranch
Zone 18 Old Ranch Summit
Zone 19 Glass House
1 Zones 1 & 2 exclude the Dougherty Valley area in accordance with the annexation agreement with the City. The County 29 Service Area M-provides for the landscaping and lighting costs associated with Dougherty Valley. 2Zone 2 excludesthe Bishop Ranch area in accordance with the annexation agreement with the City. The agreement stipulates that Zone 2 landscaping costs will not be levied on Bishop Ranch because Sunset Development maintains Bishop Ranch landscaping at its own expense.

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
7 IV. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS
The description and location of existing and proposed new improvements that are or will be maintained by the District during FY 2025/26 are as follows:

Existing Improvements

1. Zone 1 - Citywide Lighting
Zone 1 improvements consist of various lighting improvements located throughout the City with the exception of the Dougherty Valley area. A listing of street light locations for Zone 1 is on file with the Public Works -Public Services Division.

During Fiscal Years 2011/12 and 2012/13, the City converted high-pressure sodium street lights to a more energy-efficient, light-emitting diode (LED) technology. This conversion was performed in two phases:

Phase 1 converted approximately 600 streetlights in the Zone 1 area at a cost of $377,505. This work was possible due to an Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant as a part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, in the amount of $215,600; PG&E utility rebates in the amount of $63,465; and Zone 1 funding in the amount of $98,440.

Phase 2 converted the remaining approximately 1,000 Zone 1 streetlights through funding provided by a General Fund loan and lease agreement with Banc of America Public Capital Corporation. PG&E rebates are being used to repay the General Fund loan and energy savings resulting from the LED conversion are being used to pay the 12-year lease resulting in no net cost to the City for that 12- year period. After the lease period, the City will realize an approximate 50% reduction in costs due to energy savings.

The new technology has not only lowered energy usage and costs, but delivers improved performance and quality of light, resulting in longer product lifespan and has reduced greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, thirty (30) overhead retroreflective signs have been purchased in order to convert illuminated street name signs.

2. Zones 2 through 19 - Citywide Landscaping and Special Zones Zone 2 through 19 improvements are listed in Appendix C. The approximate location of each Zone is shown on the Assessment Diagram in Appendix B.

Proposed New Improvements
Proposed new improvements are installed either by the City as capital improvement projects, upgrades paid for through operating budgets, or by developers in accordance with their development conditions of approval. In the latter category, the development Conditions of Approval and the approved Final Map designate those landscaped areas to be maintained by the City. All other landscaped areas remain under private maintenance. In the event that a private

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
8 Property owner(s)/developer(s) want to transfer landscaped maintenance responsibilities for privately maintained areas adjacent to the public right-of-way to the City; such transfers shall conform to the guidelines in Appendix D.

Proposed Upgrades – Capital Improvement Program (CIPs) of FY 2025/2026 Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs) are projects identified as new construction, replacement, and/or renovation of infrastructure within each Zone that is over and above annual operating expenses. Additional details regarding the projects are provided in Appendix C and the longterm financing of the projects is indicated in the Reserve Study in Appendix G.

The following are the proposed new Zone- specific CIPs. The amounts shown represent the funding requests for FY 2025/26. The allocations from each Zone to the respective CIPs as indicated below are from the current fiscal year.

CIP 300001 – Citywide Lighting Zone Improvements – Zone 1 - $0 As part of the City Village – Summerhill Homes project (SD 9576), a total of 11 new streetlamps will be installed on Norris Canyon Road, Camino Ramon and Executive Parkway. Eleven existing streetlights will also be converted to LEDs. All new streetlamp heads will be owned by PG&E. All improvements will be constructed and paid for by the developer.

CIP 300002 – Citywide Landscaping Zone Improvements – Zone 2 - $26,000 Work for FY 2025/26 includes removal/replacement of declining trees, mulch installation, and landscape and irrigation renovations in various locations.

CIP 300003 – Canyon Lakes Zone Improvements – Zone 3 - $30,000 Work for FY 2025/26 includes removal/replacement of declining trees, mulch installation, and landscape and irrigation renovationsin variouslocations.

CIP 300004 – Vista San Ramon Zone Improvements – Zone 4 - $6,800 Work for FY 2025/26 includes an irrigation controller and master valve upgrade.

CIP 300005 – Summerwood Loop Zone Improvements – Zone 5 - $0 There are no new improvement projects scheduled for FY 2025/26.

CIP 300006 – West Branch Zone Improvements – Zone 6 - $0 There are no new improvement projects scheduled for FY 2025/26.

CIP 300007 – Bent Creek Zone Improvements – Zone 7 - $0 There are no new improvement projects scheduled for FY 2025/26.

CIP 300008 – Deerwood Zone Improvements – Zone 8 - $0
There are no new improvement projects scheduled for FY 2025/26.

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
9 CIP 300009 – Country View Zone Improvements – Zone 9 - $0 Work for FY 2025/26 includes supplemental landscape and irrigation not included in the Crow Canyon Road widening project using existing CIP funds.

CIP 300010 – Old Ranch Estates Zone Improvements – Zone 10 - $0 There are no new improvement projects scheduled for FY 2025/26.

CIP 300011 – Village Parkway Zone Improvements – Zone 11 - $1,000 Work for FY 2025/26 includes infill and replacement of dead or declining plants and trees.

CIP 300012 – El Nido Zone Improvements – Zone 12 - $1,000 Work for FY 2025/26 includes infill and replacement of dead or declining plants and trees.

CIP 300013 – Crown Ridge Zone Improvements – Zone 13 - $0 There are no new improvement projects scheduled for FY 2025/26.

CIP 300014 – Four Oaks Zone Improvements – Zone 14 - $0 There are no new improvement projects scheduled for FY 2025/26.

CIP 300015 – Circle E Zone Improvements – Zone 15 - $3,000 Work for FY 2025/26 includes infill and replacement of dead or declining plants and trees.

CIP 300016 – Thomas Ranch Zone Improvements – Zone 16 - $1,000 Work for FY 2025/26 includes infill and replacement of dead or declining plants and trees.

CIP 300017 – Henry Ranch Improvements – Zone 17 - $0
There are no new improvement projects scheduled for FY 2025/26.

CIP 300018 – Old Ranch Summit Zone Improvements – Zone 18 - $0 There are no new improvement projects scheduled for FY 2025/26.

CIP 300019 – Glass House Zone Improvements – Zone 19 - $1,000 Work for FY 2025/26 includes infill and replacement of dead or declining plants and trees.

CIP 300021 – Relamping – Zone 1- $0
There are no new improvement projects scheduled for FY 2025/26. Sufficient parts are available for re-lamping, so no new purchases are anticipated this fiscal year.

CIP 905530 – Bollinger Canyon Rd./Iron Horse Trail Bicycle Pedestrian Overcrossing – Zone 1 - $0
It is anticipated that the Bollinger Canyon Road at Iron Horse Trail Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing will include substantial safety lighting improvements on the bridge and its approaches. Work is expected to be completed by December 2025. There are no new improvement projects scheduled for FY 2025/26.

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
10 V. DISTRICT FUNDING
The District is funded through two Citywide funding sources and special zones, as discussed below:

1. Citywide Zone Assessments (Zones 1 and 2)
The assessment is collected on the property tax rolls from certain property owners within the City of San Ramon. It was confirmed by a majority vote through Measure K during the November 1996 election. Measure K provided for a continuation of an assessment of $53 per single-family unit per year for Zones 1 & 2 through June 1998, with an increase to $59 per single-family unit per year beginning July 1, 1998, and for each year thereafter.

The Citywide assessment of $59 per unit per year allocated $19 to Citywide street lighting and $40 to Citywide landscaping.

In accordance with Proposition 218, the City conducted a mailed ballot election for the Zone 1 and Zone 2 assessment increase. The election approved the FY 2006/07 assessment at $79 per unit per year and an annual increase based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) not exceeding 2%. With the $20 increase, these assessments increased proportionately such that the increase to the street lighting assessment was $6 per unit per year, for a total of $25, and the increase to the landscaping assessment was $14 per unit per year, for a total of $54.

Since then, maximum assessment rates for Zone 1 and 2 have been raised by the allowable CPI and are currently at the maximum allowable rates for each Zone as voted by property owners. The February 2025 CPI increase is 2.7%; therefore, the maximum allowable assessment and the maximum assessment rate increase is 2% for FY 2025/26.

A total of 34 parcels are assessed only for Citywide street lighting. These parcels are within Bishop Ranch. Bishop Ranch is responsible for t h e c o s t a n d l a n d s c a p e m a i n t e n a n c e in accordance with the City's annexation agreement with the City.

New Developments for FY 2025/26 are detailed below:

In addition to minor new development projects throughout the City, the Landscaping & Lighting District annexed The Preserve (Faria) into Zones 1 and 2 in March of 2018.

Improvements that will be constructed as part of The Preserve and accepted by the City for maintenance, funded by Zones 1 and 2, will consist of new lighting and are described generally in the Faria Preserve Conditions of Approval and on the following Improvement Plans as accepted by the City:
• Subdivision 9342, The Preserve – Purdue Road, by Gates & Associates • Subdivision 9342, Faria Preserve – Faria Preserve Parkway, Phase 1, by Gates & Associates
• Subdivision 9342, Faria Preserve – Faria Preserve Parkway, Phase 2, by Gates & Associates
• Mainline Extension, Subdivision 9342 – Public Street Lighting, Giacalone

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
11 • Design Services, Inc.

These plans indicate the installation of 40 new streetlights, associated poles, and improvements.
• The Faira Preserve Parkway roundabouts have not been accepted.

All of the improvements are anticipated to be accepted during FY 2025/26.

2. Zone Assessments (Zones 3 - 19)
The Zone assessments are also collected on the property tax rolls from property owners within each Zone. The funds for each Zone can only be used to maintain or improve the Zone from which they are collected. In addition, any funds that are not used in any given year must be carried over to the following year.

VI. ASSESSMENT RATES
FY 2025/26 Maximum Assessment Rates - Zones 1, 2, 4, 18, and 19 Each Zone has a maximum allowed assessment rate. Each year the City may increase or decrease the actual assessment for each Zone to the maximum allowed rate for that Zone. The City may choose to assess at less than the maximum rate. Four of the zones in Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1984-1 (Zones 1, 2, 18, and 19) have maximum assessment rates that property owners have approved to increase up to 2% each year for changes in the CPI. The February Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco Bay Area, All Urban Consumers, is used. The current maximum rate for Zones 4 was set through a mailed ballot election in May 2023, when property owners approved a new maximum rate, which shall be increased annually by the February Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco Bay Area, All Urban Consumers (CPI).

February 2025 CPI shows an increase of 2.7% compared to the 2.4% increase over the February 2024 CPI. Therefore, the maximum assessment rates for Zones 1, 2, and 19 have increased by 2%, which was approved by property owners through the ballot process in 2006. The maximum assessment rate for Zone 4 will be increased by 2.7%, which property owners approved through a ballot process in 2023. No maximum assessment rate increases or decreases are recommended for Zone 18 in FY 2025/26.

FY 2025/26 Assessments Increases/Decreases
Zones 1 and 2 – Citywide Lighting and Citywide Landscaping - Based on the February 2025 CPI increase noted above, the FY 2025/26 assessment caps for Zones 1 and 2 have been increased by the 2% maximum approved by property owners or $2.23 per unit per year.

Due to projected expenses for Zone 1, the assessment to be levied will be increased by $0.71, raising the assessment to $35.98 for FY 2025/26. Zone 2 will be increased by $1.52, raising the assessment to be levied to $77.73 for FY 2025/26. The total combined assessment to be levied is $113.71 annually.

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
12 Zone 4 – Vista San Ramon – Based on the February 2025 CPI increase noted above, the FY 2025/26 assessment cap for Zone 4 has been increased by the current CPI (2.7%) approved by property owners from $394 to $405. The assessment for Vista San Ramon will decrease from $394 to $300 annually, a decrease of $94 per unit (the maximum assessment rate for Vista San Ramon is $405). Vista San Ramon has adequate reserves, thus necessitating the assessment rate decrease. However, based on a detailed deferred maintenance study and to ensure the assessment keeps pace with the cost of maintaining the zone improvements, future increases may be needed.

Zone 5 – Summerwood Loop - The assessment for Summerwood Loop has been increased from $120 to $130 annually, an increase of $10 per unit (the maximum assessment rate for Summerwood Loop is $160). This increase will ensure the assessment keeps pace with the cost of maintaining the zone improvements and cover the cost of bringing forward landscape renovation projects.

Zone 9 – Country View - The assessment for Country View has been increased from $0 to $80 annually, an increase of $80 per unit (the maximum assessment rate for Country View is $100). Country View had an Assessment Rate holiday in FY 2024/25 due to the Crow Canyon Road Widening Project. This increase will ensure the assessment keeps pace with the cost of maintaining the zone improvements and cover the cost of bringing forward landscape renovation projects.

Zone 10 – Old Ranch Estates - The assessment for Old Ranch Estates has been increased from $350 to $380 annually, an increase of $30 per unit (the maximum assessment rate for Old Ranch Estates is $380). This increase will ensure the assessment keeps pace with the cost of maintaining the zone improvements and cover the cost of bringing forward landscape renovation projects.

Zone 12 – El Nido - The assessment for El Nido has been increased from $110 to $125 annually, an increase of $15 per unit (the maximum assessment rate for El Nido View is $125).

This increase will ensure the assessment keeps pace with the cost of maintaining the zone improvements and cover the cost of bringing forward landscape renovation projects.

Zone 15 – Circle E - The assessment for Circle E has been increased from $225 to $235 annually, an increase of $10 per unit (the maximum assessment rate for Circle E is $300). This increase will ensure the assessment keeps pace with the cost of maintaining the zone improvements.

Zone 16 – Thomas Ranch - The assessment for Thomas Ranch has been increased from $75 to $85 annually, an increase of $10 per unit (the maximum assessment rate for Thomas Ranch is $100). This increase will ensure the assessment keeps pace with the cost of maintaining the zone improvements.

Zone 17 – Henry Ranch - The assessment for Henry Ranch has been increased from $225 to $275 annually, an increase of $50 per unit (the maximum assessment rate for Henry Ranch is $375). This increase will ensure the assessment keeps pace with the cost of

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
13 maintaining the zone improvements. Additionally, a retaining wall failure during FY 2024/25 necessitated appropriating funds from the Zone 17 reserve balance.

Zone 18 – Old Ranch Summit - The assessment for Old Ranch Summit has been increased from $350 to $400 annually, an increase of $50 per unit (the maximum assessment rate for Old Ranch Summit is $1,858). This increase will ensure the assessment keeps pace with the cost of maintaining the zone improvements.

Zone 19 – Glass House - Based on the February 2025 CPI increase noted above, the FY 2025/26 assessment caps for Zones 1 9 h a v e increased by the 2% maximum approved by property owners from $15,802 to $16,118 annually, an increase of $316 per unit per year (maximum assessment rate for Glass House is $16,118). This increase will ensure the assessment keeps pace with the cost of maintaining the zone improvements and landscape renovations. This assessment is split through the method of apportionment described below.

There are no assessment increases or decreases for Zones 3, 6, 7, 8, 11, 13, and 14 for FY 2025/26.

VII. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
Assessments are allocated in accordance with the Benefit Methodology included in Appendix B and the following Assessment Methodology. Within the zones, the assessment is determined by the land use, the parcel's size, and the parcel's intensity of use. Land use is classified as either (1) residential, (2) industrial, or (3) commercial and institutional. Within these use classifications, an estimate of benefit is derived by considering the amount of lighting provided, the number of pedestrians generated by the land use, and the enhancement of the security and beauty of the property. The benefits of a single-family home provide the base for "unit" (proportion) calculations. In other words, a single-family home's unit factor is one (1.0). The unit factor for other land uses is proportional to the benefit each parcel receives relative to a single-family home.

Uses involving more people have higher unit factors and uses with less frontage have lower unit factors. For example, a condominium's unit factor is 0.75 (because there is less street frontage).

In contrast, commercial property unit factors range from 4 to 36 (because more people use theproperty and benefit from the improvements). See Appendix E for the complete street Landscaping & Lighting unit factors table.

Once costs are determined and each parcel's factors are determined, each Zone's costs are divided by the total of that Zone's factors to determine the cost per factor. Each parcel's factor is then multiplied by the appropriate Zone's factor cost(s) to determine that parcel's FY 2025/26 assessment.

Zone 5 (Summerwood Loop) Assessment Methodology
Improvements
See Appendix C for a description of the improvements in Zone 5.

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
14 Estimated Costs
The estimated costs for maintaining the improvements within Zone 5 and for current and upcoming capital improvements are summarized in the Special Zone 5 Costs Benefit Distribution and Assessment Table below. The reserves and long-term financing of the Zone are outlined in the Reserve Fund Study, Table 2, attached.

Special and General Benefit
Special benefit has been determined by breaking the landscaped areas into subareas, estimating the special benefit derived to residents in Zone 5 for each subarea and determining the total general and special benefit as a weighted total of each subarea. Benefits include aesthetic benefits, security and safety benefits, landscaped buffers for traffic, shade from nearby trees, and benefits for pedestrians and motorists from landscaping and trash removal adjacent to the walking path and travelways. These benefits are shared to varying degrees by residents outside of Zone 5 depending on the location of the landscaping improvement relative to residential units outside of the Zone, arterial roadways (Alcosta Boulevard), and the Iron Horse Trail. That portion of the benefit attributable to special benefit is considered a general benefit or the maintenance responsibility of Citywide Zone 2.

Arterial
For locations adjacent to Alcosta Boulevard, the majority of the benefit is assumed to be obtained by those residents closest to the improvement and, therefore, pass it more frequently, resulting in benefits from its appearance and buffering effect from arterial traffic. However, the substantial benefit is attributable to passing users of the arterial road. For this reason, the benefit is split into 70% special benefit and 30% benefit attributable to general benefit or the Citywide Zone 2.

Interior
For all other areas, the general benefit can be determined based on:
1) The proximity (location) of the landscaped improvements to homes within Zone 5 relative to its proximity areas outside Zone 5. The amount of pedestrian traffic from outside of Zone 5 compared to that within Zone 5 that will pass by or use the landscaped areas. 2) The amount of vehicle traffic from outside Zone 5 compared to that within Zone 5 that will pass by the landscaped areas.

For each subarea, it is assumed that the value of the location relative to its proximity to dwelling units within Zone 5 is worth 50 benefit points. The value to pedestrians is worth up to 25 benefit points, and the value to motorists is worth up to 25 benefit points. The cumulative general benefit is calculated based on the general benefit for each subarea and the relative size of the landscaping within each subarea relative to the total.

The apportionment of benefit from location is based on the relative proximity of the landscaped improvement to assessed dwelling units relative to property that is outside of Zone 5, such that if a landscaped area is, on average, 10 feet from a home and 90 feet from the edge of the Zone then

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
15 10% of the benefit would be attributable to general benefit.

The apportionment of benefit due to pedestrian traffic depends on the area. For areas adjacent to Fallview Street, the pedestrian traffic is assumed to be approximately proportionate to the number of units within Zone 5 versus those in the adjoining apartment complex. That ratio is 416:421 (apartments: Zone 5 assessment units) or approximately 50 percent. Areas adjacent to Summerwood Loop are on the opposite side of the road from the apartments. It is, therefore, assumed that residents within Zone 5 will use the path more often as a route of travel than those outside of Zone 5. Some residents will also use the path from outside the Zone, including residents using it as a safe route to school. For areas adjacent to the Iron Horse Trail, it is also anticipated that the majority of the pedestrians using the path will be from within Zone 5, but with significant users from the apartment area and other users from outside the Zone, including students going to school. Therefore, the general benefit points can be determined using a ratio of 33 percent for both areas.

The apportionment of benefit points to motorists was established by assuming the great majority of traffic on minor streets is associated with Zone 5 dwelling units as opposed to passing traffic or traffic associated with apartments. However, some traffic is due to drop-offs for school purposes and other reasons. Therefore, 10 percent of the benefit is assumed to be general along Fallview Street and near the Iron Horse Trail. For areas adjacent to Summerwood Loop, the general benefit is 50 percent to account for traffic from the apartments and other non-local traffic and drop-offs for school.

The overall distribution of benefit points for the subareas in Zone 5 is summarized below. The total general and special benefit was calculated by totaling the benefit in each area and weighing the size of the landscaped subareas. The subareas belonging to the HOA are not included in the maintenance. Any landscaped areas along Springfield Drive will not be maintained with Zone 5 funds and are assumed to be 100 percent general benefit for calculating general benefit. The capital costs listed below are from Zone 5 and do not include capital costs to be paid for by nonzone funds.

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
16 The overall distribution of special and general benefit/Zone 2 responsibility is 67.65% special benefit and 32.35% general benefit. The distribution of special benefit and general benefit/Zone 2 responsibility is indicated in the Zone 5 Costs, Benefit Distribution, and Assessment table above.

Total Points
Summerwood
Loop
Fallview Street Near Iron Horse Trail
50 11 (22%) 0 22 (44%)
25 8.25 (33%) 12.5 (50%) 8.25 (33%)
25 12.5 (50%) 2.5 (10%) 2.5 (10%)
$ 79,517
$ (8,897)
$ -
$ 70,620
129901.361 ft^2
$ 0.544
SubArea
Landscape Area
(ft^2)
General Benefit or
Citywide (%)
Special Benefit
(%)
General Benefit
Cost
Special Benefit Cost
1 10,391 0.3 0.7000 $ 1,695 $ 3,954
2 49,867 0.3175 0.6825 $ 8,607 $ 18,502
3 HOA N/A NA N/A N/A
4 5,225 1 0.0000 $ 2,841 $ -
5 18,286 0.15 0.8500 $ 1,491 $ 8,450
6 46,133 0.3275 0.6725 $ 8,214 $ 16,866
Total 129,902 32.35% 67.65% $ 22,847 $ 47,773
Consultants $ -
Tax Roll Fee $ -
$ 8,897.00
$ -
Total $ 8,897.00
$ 70,620
$ (22,847)
$ 8,897
$ 56,670
$ 1,500
$ 55,170
421
$ 131.00
*This is discressionary, may assess at a lower rate.

Motorist
Special Zone 5
General Benefit Points Per Category For Each SubArea
Benefit Category
Location
Pedestrian
Total Cost (Operating + Capital, No Admin)
FY 2025/26 Operating and Capital Costs
Operating Cost
minus Indirect Costs
Capital Costs
Total Direct Cost
Total Landscape Area
Cost Per Square Foot
Administration Cost
Overhead and Administration
Administration Staffing
Assessment Analysis
*Calculated Assessment Per unit
Less General Benefit or Citywide
Plus Admin
Total Assessable Cost
Less Reserve Applied to current year
Net to be Assessed
Number of Benefit Units

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
17 Method of Assessment
The assessment spread shall be the same as that used for the entirety of the District, as indicated in the Engineer's Report.

Assessment to be Levied
The assessment to be levied per assessment unit for Zone 5 is based on:
1) The maintenance and capital costs as distributed between special and general benefit/Zone 2 responsibility.
2) The administrative costs for the Zone.
3) The number of assessment units in the Zone.
4) Maintenance of reserves necessary for cash flow and capital improvement projects.

There are 421 assessment units within the Zone.

The maximum allowable assessment is $160 per assessment unit.

The assessment to be levied for FY 2025/26 is $130.00 per assessment unit.

Zone 19 (Glass House) Assessment Methodology
The assessment methodology for Zone 19 is different from that of the other 18 Zones.

Zone 19 is comprised of three (3) parcels totaling 30.734 acres located in the southwest portion of the City on San Ramon Valley Boulevard. The three (3) property owners consist of City of San Ramon (City), First Baptist Church of Dublin-San Ramon (Church), and American Baptist Homes of the West (Valley Vista). Like other Special Zones within the City's Landscaping & Lighting District, this Zone is financially responsible for the maintenance and operation of improvements in the immediate vicinity. These public improvements generally include a parking lot, driveway, handicap ramp, and associated landscaping and lighting that were constructed by Valley Vista as a part of their Conditions of Approval and service the three (3) parcels.

The total operation, maintenance, and servicing costs for the driveway maintenance, parking area maintenance, handicap ramp maintenance, landscaping maintenance, and lighting operation are apportioned in accordance with a methodology that is consistent with standard assessment engineering practices.

In order to determine an equitable allocation to each parcel, the improvements listed above have been broken down into discrete maintenance components, and a benefit spread methodology has been created for each.

Driveway Maintenance
There is a 7,610-square-foot driveway that accesses San Ramon Valley Boulevard and services each of the three (3) properties. The driveway maintenance cost is estimated to be $3,130.66 annually (in 2009 dollars) and includes sidewalks, storm drains, lighting, street sweeping, and signage. The standard method used to allocate the driveway maintenance costs to the three (3) benefiting parcels was based on the vehicle traffic received by each property.

Projected traffic was assessed based on the total number of parking spaces allocated to each

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
18 parcel. There are a total of 121 parking spaces allocated to the three (3) parcels (20 for the City, 39 for the Church, and 62 for Valley Vista). Therefore, the $3,130.66 will be allocated as $517.46 (16.53%) to the City, $1,009.06 (32.23%) to the Church, and $1,604.14 (51.24%) to Valley Vista.

Parking Lot Maintenance
As a Condition of Approval for Valley Vista, they built a 17-stall parking area that services two (2) of the three (3) properties (City and Church parcels). The Valley Vista parcel does not use the parking lot. The parking lot has restricted usage of 14 hours each day between the hours of 6:00
a.m. and 10:00 p.m. This parking lot is used for overflow parking from the City parcel and the Church parcel. The Church parcel has a restricted easement that allows them to use the parking lot for 4 hours each Sunday. The parking lot maintenance is $3,903 annually (in 2009 dollars) and includes pavement maintenance, parking stall marking, sweeping, storm drains, and sidewalks. The standard method used to allocate the parking lot maintenance to the two (2) benefitting parcels was based on the total number of hours used by each property owner. It is estimated there are 112 total parking hours (16 hours/day x 7 days). It is assumed that the City will use the parking lot 108 hours per week and the Church will use the parking lot 4 hours per week. Valley Vista will not use the parking lot. Therefore, the $3,903 is allocated as $3,763.60 (96.43%) to the City, $139.39 (3.57%) to the Church, and $0 to Valley Vista.

Handicap Ramp
A bus stop was constructed along San Ramon Valley Boulevard adjacent to and accessible to the three (3) properties. A handicap ramp was not required to access the properties but was built by Valley Vista to enhance access to their property. The handicap ramp is approximately 1,400 square feet and maintenance is estimated to be $3,542.75 annually (in 2009 dollars). The maintenance of the handicap ramp only includes surface improvements such as concrete, handrails, lighting, and storm drains (it does not include any subsurface improvements). Since the handicap ramp was built to enhance the Valley Vista property, 100% of the maintenance is the responsibility of Valley Vista.

Landscape Maintenance
Approximately 5,800 square feet of landscaping improvements were installed adjacent to the parking area. The landscaping improvement maintenance requirements include tree maintenance and replacement, shrub ground cover maintenance and replacement, irrigation, utilities (such as water and electricity), and the replacement of irrigation controllers. The annual maintenance cost is approximately $2,711 (in 2009 dollars). It has been agreed upon by the three (3) property owners that the total cost of maintaining the landscaping will be 100% allocated to the City parcel.

In summary, the total costs of the maintenance represented above are $13,811 annually (in 2009 dollars). Based upon the above calculations, the City is responsible for approximately 52.7%, the Church is responsible for approximately 8.6%, and Valley Vista is responsible for approximately 38.7%.

It should be noted that, prior to the formation of Zone 19, the three parcel owners were responsible for paying the Zone 1 and Zone 2 assessments. Each parcel owner will continue to

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
19 pay those assessments in addition to the Zone 19 assessment.

Assessment Range
The per-unit ranges for all zones are determined by estimating the costs for the current year at the time the range is established and dividing the costs by the number of unit factors estimated for that year. This per-unit cost becomes the bottom of the range. The top of the range is determined by estimating the costs at the end of a five-year period and dividing that number by the number of expected unit factors at that time.

VIII. REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
Charts in Appendix F provide a summary of the proposed zone budget for FY 2025/26, FY 2024/25 adopted and projected year-end revenues and expenditures, and FY 2023/24 final budget. The total FY 2025/26 proposed budget for the Landscaping & Lighting District is $4,064,435. The distribution of costs between assessable properties is determined by the Assessment Methodology described in Section VII of this Report.

IX. ASSESSMENTROLL
The following is a summary of information included in the Assessment Roll that, because of its bulk, is filed separately with the City Clerk. According to the Landscaping and Lighting Act, the information must include a listing of all parcels of land within the assessment district. Each parcel must be listed by its distinctive designation, a description of the parcel, and the proposed assessment of the parcel in proportion to the estimated benefit it receives from the improvement.

This is done in the following format:

Property Description Property Description FY 2025/26
(Assessor's Parcel #) (Assessor's Description) Assessment Total Assessment: $4,064,435
The lines and dimensions of each parcel are as shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County of Contra Costa, which by reference is hereby made a part of this Report.

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
A-1

APPENDIX A
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-029

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON

DESCRIBING NEW IMPROVEMENTS AND ORDERING THE DISTRICT ENGINEER TO PREPARE AND FILE THE LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 1984-1 ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR FY 2025/26
WHEREAS, Section 22622 of the Streets and Highways Code requires that the City Council order the preparation of an Engineer's Report prior to initiating proceedings to set the annual levy of assessments for any Assessment District created under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of San Ramon does hereby order the District Engineer to prepare and file the Landscaping & Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, at the meeting of March 11, 2025 by the following votes:

AYES: Cm. Adler; Jweinat, Rubio, Verose, and Mayor Armstrong NOES: ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) (LL)
B-1
APPENDIX B 8.2.a
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 :

C-1
(LL)

APPENDIX C

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS
Details of the streetlights and landscaping improvements within the District and locations of these improvements are outlined in the final maps, subdivision improvement plans, capital improvement plans, and as follows:

Zone 1 – Citywide Lighting
A list of street light locations for Zone 1 is on file with the Public Works Department, Public Services Division. They are located throughout the City with the exception of Dougherty Valley.

Zone 2 – Citywide Landscaping
Refer to the Assessment Diagram for the general location and extent of improvements. The general nature of the improvements includes tree, shrubs, groundcover, turf, irrigation, and decorative lighting. These areas exclude Bishop Ranch and Dougherty Valley.

Zone 3 – Canyon Lakes
Refer to the Assessment Diagram for the general location and extent of improvements. The general nature of the improvements includes trees, shrubs, groundcover, irrigation, and one decorative wall with decorative lighting.

Zone 4 – Vista San Ramon
Refer to the Assessment Diagram for the general location and extent of improvements. The general nature of the improvements includes trees, shrubs, groundcover, irrigation, and decorative lighting.

Zone 5 – Summerwood Loop
Refer to the Assessment Diagram for the general location and extent of improvements. The general nature of the improvements includes trees, shrubs, groundcover, and irrigation.

Zone 6 – West Branch
Refer to the Assessment Diagram for the general location and extent of improvements. The general nature of the improvements includes trees, shrubs, groundcover, irrigation, two decorative fountains, three gazebos, decorative lighting, pathways, jogging trails (including bridge), exterior soundwall maintenance, and open space.

Zone 7 – Bent Creek
Refer to the Assessment Diagram for the general location and extent of improvements. The general nature of the improvements includes trees, shrubs, groundcover, irrigation, pathways, and a creek.

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) C-2
(LL)
Zone 8 - Deerwood
Refer to the Assessment Diagram for the general location and extent of improvements. The general nature of the improvements includes trees, shrubs, groundcover, irrigation, a retaining wall, an entrance sign, and decorative lighting.

Zone 9 – Country View
Refer to the Assessment Diagram for the general location and extent of improvements. The general nature of the improvements includes trees, shrubs, groundcover, irrigation, and decorative lighting.

Zone 10 – Old Ranch Estates
Refer to the Assessment Diagram for the general location and extent of improvements. The general nature of the improvements includes trees, shrubs, groundcover, entrance sign, irrigation, decorative lighting, and open space.

Zone 11 – Village Parkway
Refer to the Assessment Diagram for the general location and extent of improvements. The general nature of the improvements includes trees, shrubs, groundcover, irrigation, and decorative lighting.

Zone 12 – El Nido
Refer to the Assessment Diagram for the general location and extent of improvements. The general nature of the improvements includes trees, shrubs, groundcover, irrigation, detention basin, fencing, maintenance road, and creeks.

Zone 13 – Crown Ridge
Refer to the Assessment Diagram for the general location and extent of improvements. The general nature of the improvements includes trees, shrubs, groundcover, irrigation, a detention basin, and a maintenance road.

Zone 14 – Four Oaks
Refer to the Assessment Diagram for the general location and extent of improvements. The general nature of the improvements includes trees, shrubs, groundcover, irrigation, a detention basin, fencing, and a maintenance road.

Zone 15 – Circle E
Refer to the Assessment Diagram forthe general location and extent of improvements. The general nature of the improvements includes trees, shrubs, groundcover, irrigation, and a detention basin.

Zone 16 – Thomas Ranch
Refer to the Assessment Diagram forthe general location and extent of improvements. The general nature of the improvements includes trees, shrubs, groundcover and irrigation.

Zone 17 – Henry Ranch
Refer to the Assessment Diagram for the general location and extent of improvements. The general

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) C-3
(LL)
nature of the improvements includes trees, shrubs, groundcover, irrigation, and a Vortech water control facility.

Zone 18 – Old Ranch Summit
Refer to the Assessment Diagram forthe general location and extent of improvements. The general nature of the improvements includes trees, shrubs, groundcover, irrigation, and detention basins.

Zone 19 – Glass House
Refer to the Assessment Diagram for the general location and extent of improvements. The general nature of the improvements includes trees, shrubs, groundcover, irrigation, a driveway, parking area, and handicap ramp.

Additional details are provided on the attached capital improvement program project description sheets.

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) CapitalImprovement Program 2025/26
- 2029/30
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Fund (LL)
No Pr # Project Name Prior Yrs 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total 5Yr Beyond 5yr Total Project 1 300007 Bent Creek Zone Improvements - Zone 7 $161,768 $0 $0 $2,500 $2,000 $0 $4,500 $115,500 $281,768 2 905530 Bollinger Canyon Rd. / Iron Horse Trail Bicycle Pedestrian Overcrossing
$500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 3 300003 Canyon Lakes Zone Improvements - Zone 3 $315,000 $30,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $0 $75,000 $0 $390,000 4 935404 Centralized Irrigation System Upgrade $349,246 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $349,246 5 300015 Circle E Zone Improvements - Zone 15 $58,664 $3,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $54,000 $116,664 6 300002 Citywide Landscaping Zone Improvements - Zone 2
$474,000 $26,000 $21,800 $0 $15,300 $0 $63,100 $451,000 $988,100 7 300001 Citywide Lighting Zone Improvements - Zone 1
$185,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,174,000 $1,359,400 8 300021 Citywide Lighting Zone Street Lights Improvements - Zone 1
$225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $725,000 9 400015 Citywide Soundwall and Retaining Wall Repairs
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
10 300009 Country View Zone Improvements - Zone 9 $21,000 $0 $0 $2,500 $0 $0 $2,500 $40,000 $63,500 11 300013 Crown Ridge Zone Improvements - Zone
13 $38,546 $0 $2,000 $0 $2,000 $0 $4,000 $46,000 $88,546 12 300008 Deerwood Zone Improvements - Zone 8 $81,441 $0 $5,600 $0 $2,500 $0 $8,100 $0 $89,541 13 300012 El Nido Zone Improvements - Zone 12 $9,809 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $2,000 $10,500 $22,309 14 955478 Fountain Repairs and Replacement $772,606 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $772,606 15 300014 Four Oaks Zone Improvements - Zone 14 $5,245 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $6,245 16 300019 Glass House Zone Improvements - Zone
19 $32,134 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $2,000 $201,532 $235,666 17 300017 Henry Ranch Zone Improvements - Zone
17 $4,157 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 $11,500 $17,657
18 955516 Irrigation Booster Pump Installation $23,982 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,982

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 :

CapitalImprovement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30
Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District Fund (LL)
19 300010 Old Ranch Estates Zone Improvements - $130,000 $0 $0 $6,800 $0 $0 $6,800 $0 $136,800 Zone 10
20 300018 Old Ranch Summit Zone Improvements -
Zone 18
$210,000 $0 $3,000 $0 $3,000 $0 $6,000 $25,000 $241,000 21 935488 Street Landscape Planting Renovation $514,476 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $514,476 22 300005 Summerwood Loop Zone Improvements -
Zone 5
$183,456 $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $10,000 $20,000 $454,645 $658,101 23 300016 Thomas Ranch Zone Improvements - Zone
16 $0 $1,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 $15,000 $17,000
24 300011 Village Parkway Zone Improvements -
Zone 11
$64,904 $1,000 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $2,000 $6,700 $73,604
25 300004 Vista San Ramon Zone Improvements -
Zone 4
$45,564 $6,800 $6,800 $14,500 $0 $0 $28,100 $4,600 $78,264 26 300006 West Branch Zone Improvements - Zone 6 $177,920 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,236,000 $1,413,920 Totals $4,584,319 $109,800 $69,200 $44,300 $39,800 $10,000 $273,100 $4,345,977 $9,203,396

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 :

Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT

Page 1 ends

Citywide Lighting Zone Improvements - Zone 1
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 1.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 1
City Council Priority and Goals

4. Build and maintain quality facilities and
infrastructure
Project Authorization
The Engineer's Report adopted by City Council
approved the creation of project funded by the Citywide Lighting Fund.

Comments
New Project
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. To date, completed traffic signal pole painting at the following intersections: Old Ranch Road/Dougherty Road, Old Ranch Road/Bent Creek Drive, Old Ranch Road/Monte Vista Drive, Bollinger Canyon Road/City Hall, Camino Ramon/Fostoria Way, Crow Canyon Road/Old Crow Canyon Road, Crow Canyon Road/Old Mill Road, and Crow Canyon Road/Dougherty Road. This work is scheduled annually in order to perform work to each signalized intersection on a predetermined cycle. There are no improvements scheduled for FY 2025/26.

Estimated Total Cost $1,359,400 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 185,400 0 0 0 0 0 1,174,000 1,359,400
Totals 185,400 0 0 0 0 0 1,174,000 1,359,400
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 185,400 0 0 0 0 0 1,174,000 1,359,400
Totals 185,400 0 0 0 0 0 1,174,000 1,359,400
Project Number: 300001 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Bender

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP#:2
Citywide Landscaping Zone Improvements - Zone 2
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 2.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 2
City Council Priority and Goals

Comments
New Project
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. To date, removed/replaced declining trees; replaced irrigation valves in Homestead Village; completed landscape renovations on Crow Canyon Road at Bollinger Canyon Road, Stagecoach Road, Alcosta Boulevard at Olympia Fields Drive to Pine Valley Road, and San Ramon Valley Boulevard at Castleton Court to Talavera Drive.

FY 2025/26, continue the removal/replacement of declining trees, and landscape and irrigation renovations in various locations within the Zone from prior funding. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled.

Estimated Total Cost $988,100 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 474,000 26,000 21,800 0 15,300 0 451,000 988,100 Totals 474,000 26,000 21,800 0 15,300 0 451,000 988,100 Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 474,000 26,000 21,800 0 15,300 0 451,000 988,100 Totals 474,000 26,000 21,800 0 15,300 0 451,000 988,100 Project Number: 300002 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP#:3
Canyon Lakes Zone Improvements - Zone 3
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 3.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 3
City Council Priority and Goals

Comments
New Project
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. To date, removed/replaced declining trees; replaced irrigation valves on Alcosta Boulevard; and landscape slope renovation and planting at Crow Canyon Road and Shoreline Drive. FY 2025/26, continue the removal/replacement of declining trees and various landscape and irrigation renovations. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled.

Estimated Total Cost $390,000 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 315,000 30,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 0 0 390,000 Totals 315,000 30,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 0 0 390,000
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 315,000 30,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 0 0 390,000 Totals 315,000 30,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 0 0 390,000
Project Number: 300003 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP#:4
Vista San Ramon Zone Improvements - Zone 4
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 4.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 4
City Council Priority and Goals

New Project
Comments
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. FY 2020/21 work included removal/replacement of declining trees. FY 2022/23, completed installation of mulch and landscaping. FY 2025/26, continue the removal/replacement of irrigation controllers in arterials and various landscape renovations within the Zone. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled.

Estimated Total Cost $78,264 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 45,564 6,800 6,800 14,500 0 0 4,600 78,264
Totals 45,564 6,800 6,800 14,500 0 0 4,600 78,264
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 45,564 6,800 6,800 14,500 0 0 4,600 78,264 Totals 45,564 6,800 6,800 14,500 0 0 4,600 78,264
Project Number: 300004 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP#:5
Summerwood Loop Zone Improvements - Zone 5
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 5.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 5
City Council Priority and Goals

4. Build and maintain quality facilities and
infrastructure
Project Authorization
The Engineer's Report adopted by City Council
approved the creation of project funded by the
Summerwood Loop Fund and Citywide Landscaping
Fund. City Council appropriated $80,747 from Zone 2
Fund at FY 22/23 Mid- Year review.

Comments
New Project
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. To date, completed landscape and irrigation renovation along the pathway adjacent to Iron Horse Trail as well as minor repairs to asphalt pathway throughout the Zone; replaced the entry monument to subdivision on Alcosta Boulevard; landscape and irrigation renovations; and park strip renovation on Summerwood Loop between Alcosta Boulevard and Fallen Leaf Circle. FY 2025/26, continue work including mulching and landscape renovations in various locations within the Zone from prior funding. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled. There are no improvements scheduled for FY 2025/26.

Estimated Total Cost $658,101 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 183,456 0 10,000 0 0 10,000 454,645 658,101
Totals 183,456 0 10,000 0 0 10,000 454,645 658,101
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 183,456 0 10,000 0 0 10,000 454,645 658,101 Totals 183,456 0 10,000 0 0 10,000 454,645 658,101
Project Number: 300005 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP#:6
West Branch Zone Improvements - Zone 6
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 6.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 6
City Council Priority and Goals

Comments
New Project
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. FY 2021/22, completed Fountain repairs at Reflection Fountain. FY 2025/26, based on feedback from the Zone, assess conversion of fountain to landscape and select architect to complete feasibility and renderings for the site from prior funding. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled. There are no improvements scheduled for FY 2025/26.

Estimated Total Cost $1,413,920 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 177,920 0 0 0 0 0 1,236,000 1,413,920
Totals 177,920 0 0 0 0 0 1,236,000 1,413,920
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 177,920 0 0 0 0 0 1,236,000 1,413,920
Totals 177,920 0 0 0 0 0 1,236,000 1,413,920
Project Number: 300006 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP#:7
Bent Creek Zone Improvements - Zone 7
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 7.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 7
City Council Priority and Goals

Comments
New Project
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. To date, completed replacement of remote control valves, irrigation valves on Alcosta Boulevard, landscape renovation at Dougherty Road entry corners, and painting of gazebos. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled. There are no new improvements scheduled for FY 2025/26.

Estimated Total Cost $281,768 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 161,768 0 0 2,500 2,000 0 115,500 281,768
Totals 161,768 0 0 2,500 2,000 0 115,500 281,768
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 161,768 0 0 2,500 2,000 0 115,500 281,768 Totals 161,768 0 0 2,500 2,000 0 115,500 281,768
Project Number: 300007 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP#:8
Deerwood Zone Improvements - Zone 8
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 8.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 8
City Council Priority and Goals

Comments
New Project
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. To date, completed landscape renovation and irrigation controllers within the Zone. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled. There are no improvements scheduled for FY 2025/26.

Estimated Total Cost $89,541 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 81,441 0 5,600 0 2,500 0 0 89,541
Totals 81,441 0 5,600 0 2,500 0 0 89,541
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 81,441 0 5,600 0 2,500 0 0 89,541
Totals 81,441 0 5,600 0 2,500 0 0 89,541
Project Number: 300008 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP#:9
Country View Zone Improvements - Zone 9
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 9.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 9
City Council Priority and Goals

Comments
New Project
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. FY 2022/23 completed landscape renovation including irrigation controllers and remote control valve replacement in various locations in Zone. FY 2025/26, continue supplemental landscape and irrigation renovations following the completion of the Crow Canyon Widening Projects (CIPs 905328 and 905327) from prior funding.

See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled.

There are no improvements scheduled for FY 2025/26.

Estimated Total Cost $63,500 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 21,000 0 0 2,500 0 0 40,000 63,500
Totals 21,000 0 0 2,500 0 0 40,000 63,500
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 21,000 0 0 2,500 0 0 40,000 63,500
Totals 21,000 0 0 2,500 0 0 40,000 63,500
Project Number: 300009 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP#:10
Old Ranch Estates Zone Improvements - Zone 10
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 10.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 10
City Council Priority and Goals

Comments
New Project
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. To date, completed installation of new lighting system for tree and sign up lights, landscape renovation, and irrigation repairs. FY 25/26, continue landscape renovation and irrigation repairs in various locations with prior funding. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled. There are no improvements scheduled for FY 2025/26.

Estimated Total Cost $136,800 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr
Total
All Costs 130,000 0 0 6,800 0 0 0 136,800
Totals 130,000 0 0 6,800 0 0 0 136,800
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 130,000 0 0 6,800 0 0 0 136,800
Totals 130,000 0 0 6,800 0 0 0 136,800
Project Number: 300010 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP#:11
Village Parkway Zone Improvements - Zone 11
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 11.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 11
City Council Priority and Goals

New Project
Comments
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. To date, completed landscape renovation and remote control valve replacement on Shavano Way. FY 2025/26 work includes arterial landscape and tree renovation within the Zone. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled.

Estimated Total Cost $73,604 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 64,904 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 6,700 73,604
Totals 64,904 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 6,700 73,604
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 64,904 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 6,700 73,604
Totals 64,904 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 6,700 73,604
Project Number: 300011 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP#:12
El Nido Zone Improvements - Zone 12
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 12.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 12
City Council Priority and Goals

4. Build and maintain quality facilities and
infrastructure
Project Authorization
The Engineer's Report adopted by City Council
approved the creation of project funded by the El
Nido Fund and Citywide Landscaping Fund. City
council authorized Mid-Year appropriation of $5,000
on March 9, 2021.

Comments
New Project
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. To date, completed tree repair and replacement, and remote control valves replacements. FY 25/26, work includes landscape and tree renovation in arterials within the Zone. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled.

Estimated Total Cost $22,309 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 9,809 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 10,500 22,309
Totals 9,809 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 10,500 22,309
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 9,809 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 10,500 22,309
Totals 9,809 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 10,500 22,309
Project Number: 300012 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP#:13
Crown Ridge Zone Improvements - Zone 13
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 13.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 13
City Council Priority and Goals

Comments
New Project
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. To date, completed irrigation cabinets upgrade and controllers and landscape renovation along Westside Drive; and remote control valve replacements and landscape renovations on Westside Drive. FY 2025/26, continue irrigation and landscape renovations throughout the Zone from prior funding. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled. There are no improvements scheduled for FY 2025/26.

Estimated Total Cost $88,546 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 38,546 0 2,000 0 2,000 0 46,000 88,546
Totals 38,546 0 2,000 0 2,000 0 46,000 88,546
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 38,546 0 2,000 0 2,000 0 46,000 88,546 Totals 38,546 0 2,000 0 2,000 0 46,000 88,546
Project Number: 300013 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP#:14
Four Oaks Zone Improvements - Zone 14
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 14.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 14
City Council Priority and Goals

Comments
New Project
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. FY 2019/20 completed removal and replacement of declining trees and landscaping. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled. There are no improvements scheduled for FY 2025/26.

Estimated Total Cost $6,245 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 5,245 0 1,000 0 0 0 0 6,245
Totals 5,245 0 1,000 0 0 0 0 6,245
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 5,245 0 1,000 0 0 0 0 6,245
Totals 5,245 0 1,000 0 0 0 0 6,245
Project Number: 300014 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP#:15
Circle E Zone Improvements - Zone 15
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 15.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 15
City Council Priority and Goals

FY 2025/26, continue arterial landscape renovation and tree renovations within the Zone. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled.

Estimated Total Cost $116,664 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 58,664 3,000 1,000 0 0 0 54,000 116,664
Totals 58,664 3,000 1,000 0 0 0 54,000 116,664
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 58,664 3,000 1,000 0 0 0 54,000 116,664 Totals 58,664 3,000 1,000 0 0 0 54,000 116,664
Project Number: 300015 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP#:16
Thomas Ranch Zone Improvements - Zone 16
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 16.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 16
City Council Priority and Goals

Comments
New Project
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. FY 2025/26, work includes arterial landscape renovation and tree renovations within the Zone. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled.

Estimated Total Cost $17,000 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 0 1,000 1,000 0 0 0 15,000 17,000
Totals 0 1,000 1,000 0 0 0 15,000 17,000
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 0 1,000 1,000 0 0 0 15,000 17,000
Totals 0 1,000 1,000 0 0 0 15,000 17,000
Project Number: 300016 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP#:17
Henry Ranch Zone Improvements - Zone 17
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and
renovation of improvements as identified in the
Engineer's Report and within the boundaries of the
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 17.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 17
City Council Priority and Goals

4. Build and maintain quality facilities and
infrastructure
Project Authorization
The Engineer's Report adopted by City Council
approved the creation of project funded by the Henry
Ranch Fund and Citywide Landscaping Fund. City
Council appropriated $9,000 from Zone 17 and $21,000
from Zone 2 at the April 8, 2025 Council meeting.

Comments
New Project
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. FY 2024/25, completed repair of retaining wall at San Ramon Valley Boulevard. Council appropriated $30,000 to repair the retaining wall on San Ramon Valley Boulevard in Henry Ranch Zone. No work scheduled for FY 2025/26. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled.

Estimated Total Cost $47,657 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 34,157 0 2,000 0 0 0 11,500 47,657
Totals 34,157 0 2,000 0 0 0 11,500 47,657
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 34,157 0 2,000 0 0 0 11,500 47,657
Totals 34,157 0 2,000 0 0 0 11,500 47,657
Project Number: 300017 Category: Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP 2025-26 Page 17 CIP#:300017
Old Ranch Summit Zone Improvements - Zone 18
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 18.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 18
City Council Priority and Goals

Comments
New Project
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. To date, completed replacement of remote controller valves and landscape renovation; and repairs and clean-up to detention basins in Zone. FY 2025/26, continue irrigation and landscape renovations throughout the Zone from prior funding. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled. There are no improvements scheduled for FY 2025/26.

Estimated Total Cost $241,000 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 210,000 0 3,000 0 3,000 0 25,000 241,000
Totals 210,000 0 3,000 0 3,000 0 25,000 241,000
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 210,000 0 3,000 0 3,000 0 25,000 241,000 Totals 210,000 0 3,000 0 3,000 0 25,000 241,000
Project Number: 300018 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP 2025-26 Page 17 CIP#:300017
Glass House Zone Improvements - Zone 19
Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and renovation of improvements as identified in the Engineer's Report
and within the boundaries of the Landscaping and
Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 19. It includes the
orchards on both the north and south side of the fence, nut trees on the north and fruit trees on the south. There are also pathways through the orchard, plantings along
the creek and some lighting.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 19
City Council Priority and Goals

4. Build and maintain quality facilities and
infrastructure
Project Authorization
The Engineer's Report adopted by City Council
approved the creation of project funded by the Glass
House Fund.

Comments
New Project
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. FY 2019/20 completed plant material replacement in lower parking lot area. FY 2023/24, completed interior landscape renovations and irrigation controllers and remote control valves replacement in Zone. FY 2025/26, work includes interior landscape and tree renovations. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled.

Estimated Total Cost $235,666 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 32,134 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 201,532 235,666
Totals 32,134 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 201,532 235,666
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 32,134 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 201,532 235,666 Totals 32,134 1,000 0 1,000 0 0 201,532 235,666
Project Number: 300019 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Savell/Watson

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) Capital Improvement Program 2025/26 - 2029/30

PROJECT DESCRIPTION/STATUS REPORT
CIP 2025-26 Page 17 CIP#:300017
Citywide Lighting Zone Street Lights Improvements - Zone 1 Project Description
This project provides for the replacement and upgrade
of street lights on an on-going basis, as identified in the Engineer's Report and within the boundaries of the
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1, Zone 1.

Project Location
Landscaping and Lighting District 1984-1 Zone 1
City Council Priority and Goals

4. Build and maintain quality facilities and
infrastructure
Project Authorization
The Engineer's Report adopted by the City Council
approved the creation of project funded by the Citywide Lighting Fund.

Comments
New Project
Starting in FY 2019/20, individual CIPs were created for each Zone/Special Zone in Landscape & Lighting District 1984-1 (L&L) for more efficient tracking. This project will replace the City street lights as required. Initial funding is expected to be low as most lights are within the operational life and/or are under warranty. Costs will increase with time. Initial replacements will be limited and as needed. Future replacements will be systematic. FY 2025/26, continue relamping of street lights with prior funding. See L&L Engineer's Report for FY 2025/26 for additional details and scope of work scheduled. There are no improvements scheduled for FY 2025/26.

Estimated Total Cost $725,000 Est. Annual Oper/Maint. Cost $0 Project Cost Estimate
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total All Costs 225,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 725,000
Totals 225,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 725,000
Project Funding
Prior Year 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Beyond 5 Yr Total Landscape & Ltg. 225,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 725,000
Totals 225,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 725,000
Project Number: 300021 Category:Landscaping Project Mgr: Bender

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) D-1

APPENDIX D

CITY OF SAN RAMON

LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING DISTRICT GUIDELINES

TRANSFER OF LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES FROM PRIVATE

PROPERTY OWNER(S)/DEVELOPERS TO THE CITY OF SAN RAMON FOR AREAS

ADJACENT TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
From time to time private property owner(s), Homeowners' Associations, or developers request that the City assume maintenance of existing private property, it is important to establish procedural guidelines for the assumption of such responsibilities. These guidelines are:

New Development

1. If the owner(s)/developer of a new development wishes to have an area maintained by the City, discussions will be initiated with the City during the planning review process.

2. The owner(s)/developer shall provide area and landscaping information to the City so that the City can develop maintenance cost estimates and the corresponding assessment amount.

3. After the City determines the assessment amount, including an assessment range or inflation factor, the owner(s)/developer shall petition the City in writing to request formation of a Special Landscaping & Lighting District or Special Zone within the existing Landscaping & Lighting District. This petition shall be in conformance with the Right to Vote on Taxes Act (Proposition 218).

4. Following review and confirmation of the petition, the City shall conduct a public hearing and an election of the owner(s) in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act and the Right to Vote on Taxes Act. The Public Hearing and election shall occur prior to the approval (vesting) of the development with Conditions of Approval. The assessment may only be levied if there is not a majority protest and a majority of the ballots weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property, are in favor of the proposal.

5. The owner(s)/developer can proceed to obtain City development approval designating the area(s) to be conveyed to and maintained by the City on appropriate development maps and plans.

6. Properties will be assessed upon Final Map approval by the City, recordation by the County Recorder's Office, and inclusion of the parcels on the Assessment Roll by the County Assessor's Office. It shall be the responsibility of the current property owner of each parcel to pay the assessment.

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) D-2

7. The owner(s)/developer shall be responsible to disclose the assessment on properties that are sold. If a Homeowners' Association is created within the development, the assessment shall be explained in the CC&Rs.

8. The owner(s)/developer shall install irrigation and landscaping in conformance with the approved landscaping plans. The approved plans shall be in accordance with information provided during the development review process and the City of San Ramon's Beautification Guidelines.

9. Following the completion of a minimum one-year warranty maintenance period, the City shall accept maintenance of the area.

Existing Developments

1. Discussions with the City for the transfer of maintenance shall be initiated by the property owner(s) or Homeowners' Association. The owner(s) shall provide available area and landscaping information to the City so that the City can develop any capital and/or maintenance costs and the corresponding assessment amount.

2. Based upon these discussions, the City shall determine an assessment amount, which will include an assessment range or inflation factor. The assessment amount shall include the capital costs required to bring the property up to City Beautification Standards, as well as the ongoing maintenance costs. The City may assist in financing these capital improvements through annual installment assessments consistent with the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act.

3. After the City determines the assessment amount, the owner(s) shall petition the City in writing to request formation of a Special Landscaping & Lighting District or Special Zone within the existing Landscaping & Lighting District. This petition shall be in accordance with the Right to Vote on Taxes Act.

4. Following review and confirmation of the petition, the City shall conduct a Public Hearing and an election of the owner(s) in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act and the Right to Vote on Taxes Act. The assessment may only be levied if there is not a majority protest and a majority of the ballots weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property, are in favor of the proposal.

5. The owners of the property shall convey title of the property to be maintained (including any existing facilities such as water meters), to the City.

6. Properties will be assessed upon inclusion of the assessment on the County Assessment Roll.

7. Property owners shall be responsible for disclosing the assessment upon the sale of their private property. If there is a Homeowners' Association, the assessment shall be explained in the CC&Rs.

8. Properties will be assessed upon inclusion of the parcels on the Assessment Roll by the County Assessor's Office.

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) D-3

BENEFIT METHODOLOGY
According to the Landscaping and Lighting Act, the assessment "may be apportioned by any formula or method, which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements" (Streets and Highways Code, Section 22573). Under the Right to Vote on Taxes Act, only special benefits are assessable.

Citywide Assessment
The Citywide assessment was confirmed by a majority vote for Measure K during the November 1996 elections. Measure K provides for a continuation of the $53 per unit per year Citywide assessment through June 1998. On July 1, 1998, the Citywide assessment increased to $59 per unit per year.

On July 11, 2006, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2006-106 adopting the new rate of $79 per unit for FY 2006/07, which includes an annual adjustment based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) not to exceed 2%.

The Citywide assessment provides for street lighting and three categories of landscaping:

Category 1 - Bishop Ranch Area
Landscaping maintenance within the Bishop Ranch area is governed by their Annexation Agreement to the City of San Ramon.

Category 2 - Arterial Medians
Medians along arterials are the responsibility of the City and will be maintained at a standard determined by the City. Arterials are: Crow Canyon Road, Bollinger Canyon Road (between Crow Canyon Road and Alcosta Boulevard), San Ramon Valley Boulevard, Alcosta Boulevard, Dougherty Road, Village Parkway, Fostoria Way, and Old Ranch Road.

Category 3 - Arterial Roadsides
Roadsides along arterials are the shared responsibility of the City and the adjacent private development – 30% of the cost for arterial roadsides is included within the Citywide assessment while the remaining 70% is included within the special zone assessments described below. This shared responsibility is based upon the following factors:
a. Enhanced landscaping along arterial roadsides provides special benefit to both the City and the adjacent property owners.
b. Portions of the landscaped arterial roadside areas were previously maintained by the adjacent development, or private property owners, and were then deeded over to the City for maintenance.

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) c. Arterial roadside landscaping was originally installed as part of the private development. d. In some cases, landscaped arterial roadside areas provide special benefit by serving as an entry statement into the private development area.

Confirmation of the Citywide assessment was based on the methodology as prescribed in the FY 1996/97 Engineer's Report for the City of San Ramon Landscaping & Lighting District 1984-1.

As a result, the methodology did not include the assessment of any public agency properties for the Citywide assessment. Starting in FY 2006/07 public agencies including fire stations, schools (both public and private), churches, and City owned facilities will be assessed using the commercial/institutional methodology. The methodology for nonresidential, commercial, and industrial properties remains consistent with the FY 1996/97 Engineer's Report.

Special Zone Assessments
Special zone assessments provide for landscaping and maintenance of landscaping in two categories:

Category 1 - Arterial Roadside
Roadsides along arterials are the shared responsibility of the City and the adjacent private development. The special zone assessments provide for 70% of the cost of arterial roadsides.

Category 2 - Other Areas
Public medians, parkways, public open space, and roadsides other than arterial medians and arterial roadsides provide a special benefit to and are the responsibility of the private development adjacent to such landscaping. Therefore, all costs associated with these areas are provided by the special zone assessment.

City services for the landscaping or the maintenance of these two categories will be assessed on a benefit basis against properties through the creation of a special zone. The special assessment zone will be defined by either the boundaries of the specific subdivision requesting the maintenance or by the District Engineer who will determine special benefit.

Currently, there are 17 special zones:

1. Special Zone 3 - Canyon Lakes 10. Special Zone 12 - El Nido

2. Special Zone 4 - Vista San Ramon 11. Special Zone 13 - Crown Ridge

3. Special Zone 5 - Summerwood Loop 12. Special Zone 14 - Four Oaks

4. Special Zone 6 - West Branch 13. Special Zone 15 - Circle E

5. Special Zone 7 - Bent Creek 14. Special Zone 16 - Thomas Ranch

6. Special Zone 8 - Deerwood 15. Special Zone 17 - Henry Ranch

7. Special Zone 9 - Country View 16. Special Zone 18 - Old Ranch Summit

8. Special Zone 10 - Old Ranch Estates 17. Special Zone 19 - Glass House

9. Special Zone 11 - Village Parkway
D-4

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984)

APPENDIX E

STREET LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING UNIT FACTORS
By Land Use and Use Code
Use Intensity & Security &
Land Use Code1 Visibility Pedestrian Aesthetics Total
Single Family 11-19 .375 .25 .375 1.00
Condominium 29 .250 .25 .250 .75
Multiple Residential (including hotels, motels)
Units:

Two 21 .50 .50 .50 1.50
Three 22 .75 .75 .75 2.25
Four 23 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00
Five 24 1.25 1.25 1.25 3.75
6 - 12 25 2.50 2.50 2.50 7.50
13 - 24 26 4.50 4.50 4.50 13.50
25 - 59 27 5.00 10.00 5.00 20.00
60 - 80 28 8.75 17.50 8.75 35.00
81 - 100 28 11.25 22.50 11.25 45.00
101 - 200 28 18.75 37.50 18.75 75.00
201 - 400 28 37.50 75.00 37.50 150.00
401 - 600 28 62.50 125.00 62.50 250.00
601 - 800 28 87.50 175.00 87.50 350.00
801 - 1000 28 112.00 225.00 112.50 450.00
etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.

Industrial 50 - 59 Assessment based on frontage and total area of the parcel.

Commercial and 29 - 49 Please see below
Institutional 70 - 79 Please see below
Industrial (Codes 50 - 59 - Frontage Factor plus Area Factor) Frontage (Ft) Factors Parcel Area (SF) Parcel Area (AC) Factors 0 - 200 4 0 - 25,000 0.00 - 0.57 4
201 - 500 12 25,001 - 100,000 0.58 - 2.29 12
501 - 1000 24 100,001 - 250,000 2.30 - 5.79 24
1001 or more 36 250,001 or more 5.80 or more 36
Commercial and Institutional (Codes 29 - 49 and 70 - 79 - Frontage Factor plus Area Factor) Frontage (Ft) Factors Parcel Area (SF) Parcel Area (AC) Factors 0 - 200 4 0 - 5,000 0.00 - .11 4
201 - 500 8 5,001 - 10,000 0.12 - .22 8
501 - 1,000 12 10,001 - 25,000 .23 - .58 12
1,001 - 3,000 16 25,001 - 100,000 .59 - 2.29 16
3,001 - 5,000 24 100,001 - 500,000 2.30 - 11.49 24
5,001 or more 36 500,001 or more 11.50 or more 36
1The Use Code isthe designation used by the County Assessor's Office to indicate how the land is being used.

E-1

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) 9 2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
Finance FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 857,762 $ 728,930 $ 790,614 $ 629,976

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue 938,241 820,333 935,202 954,028
Return Funding - CIP - - 600
Interest/Finance Adjustment 28,685 - - -
Damage Reimbursement 28,209 - - -
Total Revenues 995,135 820,333 935,802 954,028

EXPENDITURES
Personnel 194,090 224,020 224,020 227,648
Contracts 59,806 28,540 95,614 28,540
Utilities 513,937 589,000 589,000 657,000
Materials & Supplies 14,397 22,900 22,900 22,900
Other - - - -
Indirect Costs 87,396 113,917 113,917 117,936
Assessment Collection Fee 24,008 21,158 21,158 21,158
LED Project Financing Lease Pmt 70,648 29,831 29,831 29,831 Total Expenditures 964,283 1,029,366 1,096,440 1,105,013 Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 30,853 (209,033) (160,638) (150,985) Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 888,614 519,897 629,976 478,991 % of Operating Costs 92% 51% 57% 43%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
CIP 300001 - Signal/Street Light Pole Painting 48,000 - - - CIP 300021 - Street Light Pole Relamping 50,000 - - -
CIP 905530 - IHT Overcrossing - - - -
Total Improvement Projects 98,000 - - -
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance (67,147) (209,033) (160,638) (150,985) FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 790,614 $ 519,897 $ 629,976 $ 478,991 % of Operating Costs 82% 51% 57% 43%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 801,564 935,202 935,202 954,028 Total Parcels Levied 26,515.50 26,515.50 26,515.50 26,515.50 Assessment Rate 30.23 35.27 35.27 35.98
Maximum Assessment Rate 30.23 35.27 35.27 35.27

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 2 – CITYWIDE LANDSCAPING
F-2
7 2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
Finance FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 526,999 $ 659,741 $ 828,314 $ 797,668

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue 2,009,491 1,781,071 1,896,200 1,934,020 Return Funding - CIP - - - -
Interest/Finance Adjustment 29,510 - - -
Damage Reimbursement 5,018 - - -
Electric Vehicle Charging Station - 800 800 800
Fostoria Revenue (Town of Danville) 26,142 11,409 11,409 11,409 Total Revenues 2,070,161 1,793,280 1,908,409 1,946,229

EXPENDITURES
Personnel - Public Services 371,562 410,730 410,730 423,991 Personnel - Engineering 15,983 33,593 33,593 32,577
Contracts 393,703 431,530 431,530 462,245
Utilities 355,918 424,850 424,850 427,550
Materials & Supplies 2,532 17,050 17,050 17,050
Other 605 650 650 650
Indirect Costs 158,675 169,193 169,193 167,751
Transfers Out to Special Zones - 30% Arterial Share 358,719 362,959 353,959 384,239 Total Expenditures 1,657,697 1,850,555 1,841,555 1,916,053 Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 412,464 (57,275) 66,854 30,176 Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 939,464 602,466 895,168 827,843 % of Operating Costs 57% 33% 49% 43%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

ARTERIAL
CIP 300002 - Irrigation - - - 6,000
CIP 300002 - Landscaping/Trees 72,000 72,000 72,000 20,000 CIP 300002 - Other Improvements - - - -
Total Improvement Projects 72,000 72,000 72,000 26,000
Transfers OUT to Special Zones - 30% Arterial Share 39,150 16,500 25,500 12,840 Total Improvement Projects (Including Transfers OUT) 111,150 88,500 97,500 38,840 Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 301,314 (145,775) (30,646) (8,664) FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 828,314 $ 513,966 $ 797,668 $ 789,003 % of Operating Costs 50% 28% 43% 41%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 1,858,878 1,896,200 1,896,200 1,934,020 Total Parcels Levied 24,881.25 24,881.25 24,881.25 24,881.25 Assessment Rate 74.71 76.21 76.21 77.73
Maximum Assessment Rate 74.71 76.21 76.21 77.73

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 3 - CANYON LAKES
F-3
2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 847,755 $ 519,773 $ 627,107 $ 589,706

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue (30,118) 240,940 240,940 240,940
Return Funding - CIP - - - -
Interest 29,134 - - -
Damage Reimbursement - - - -
HOA Contribution to Landscape Renovation - - -
Other Revenue (Transfers from Citywide) 103,282 105,231 105,231 112,616 Total Revenues 102,298 346,171 346,171 353,556

EXPENDITURES
Personnel 80,521 113,839 113,839 121,336
Contracts 56,142 68,203 68,203 79,848
Utilities 87,874 120,400 120,400 123,500
Materials & Supplies 3,700 8,700 8,700 8,700
Indirect Costs 38,710 40,930 40,930 42,002
Total Expenditures 266,947 352,072 352,072 375,386
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance (164,649) (5,901) (5,901) (21,830) Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 683,107 513,872 621,206 567,876 % of Operating Costs 256% 146% 176% 151%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

ARTERIAL
CIP 300003 - Irrigation 25,000 5,000 5,000 -
CIP 300003 - Landscaping/Trees 55,000 40,000 40,000 30,000 CIP 300003 - Other Improvements
Total Improvement Projects 80,000 45,000 45,000 30,000
Transfer IN from Citywide - 30% Share of Arterial (24,000) (13,500) (13,500) (9,000) Total Improvement Projects (Including Transfer IN) 56,000 31,500 31,500 21,000 Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance (220,649) (37,401) (37,401) (42,830) FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 627,107 $ 482,372 $ 589,706 $ 546,876 % of Operating Costs 235% 137% 167% 146%
$ -

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 210,823 240,940 240,940 240,940 Total Parcels Levied 3,011.75 3,011.75 3,011.75 3,011.75 Assessment Rate 70 80 80 80
Maximum Assessment Rate 110 110 110 110

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 4 – VISTA SAN RAMON
F-4
2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 Finance $ 31,461 $ 60,312 $ 69,878 $ 77,058

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue 61,985 28,980 63,434 48,300
Return Funding - CIP 12 - - -
Interest 1,107 - - -
Damage Reimbursement - - - -
Other Revenue (Transfers from Citywide) 6,257 6,362 6,362 7,031 Total Revenues 69,361 35,342 69,796 55,331

EXPENDITURES
Personnel 8,629 8,525 8,525 9,607
Contracts 5,815 9,503 9,503 10,755
Utilities 12,071 16,800 16,800 18,100
Materials & Supplies - 1,500 1,500 1,500
Indirect Costs 4,429 4,788 4,788 5,035
Total Expenditures 30,944 41,116 41,116 44,997
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 38,417 (5,774) 28,680 10,334 Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 69,878 54,538 98,558 87,392 % of Operating Costs 226% 133% 240% 194%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

INTERIOR
CIP 300004 - Irrigation - 6,500 6,500 -
CIP 300004 - Landscaping/Trees - 15,000 15,000 -
CIP 300004 - Other Improvements - - - -

ARTERIAL
CIP 300004 - Irrigation - - - 6,800
CIP 300004 - Landscaping/Trees - - - -
CIP 300004 - Other Improvements - - - -
Total Improvement Projects - 21,500 21,500 6,800
Transfer IN from Citywide - 30% Share of Arterial - - - (2,040) Total Improvement Projects (Including Transfer IN) - 21,500 21,500 4,760 Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 38,417 (27,274) 7,180 5,574 FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 69,878 $ 33,038 $ 77,058 $ 82,632 % of Operating Costs 226% 80% 187% 184%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 61,985 63,434 63,434 48,300
Total Parcels Levied 161 161 161 161
Assessment Rate 385 394 394 300
Maximum Assessment Rate 385 394 394 405

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 5 - SUMMERWOOD LOOP
F-5
2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 45,206 $ 54,497 $ 60,894 $ 40,253

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue 73,675 67,360 50,520 54,730
Return Funding - CIP - - - -
Interest 1,872 - - -
Other Revenue (Transfers from Citywide) 27,211 23,900 23,900 22,847 Total Revenues 102,758 91,260 74,420 77,577

EXPENDITURES
Personnel 20,565 23,727 23,727 25,074
Contracts 15,291 17,976 17,976 21,226
Utilities 17,572 21,270 21,270 23,170
Materials & Supplies 1,154 1,150 1,150 1,150
Indirect Costs 7,488 8,438 8,438 8,897
Total Expenditures 62,070 72,561 72,561 79,517
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 40,688 18,699 1,859 (1,940) Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 85,894 73,196 62,753 38,313 % of Operating Costs 138% 101% 86% 48%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

INTERIOR
CIP 300005 - Irrigation - - - -
CIP 300005 - Landscaping/Trees 25,000 22,500 22,500 -
CIP 300005 - Other Improvements - - - -

ARTERIAL
CIP 300005 - Irrigation - - - -
CIP 300005 - Landscaping/Trees - - - -
CIP 300005 - Other Improvements - - - -
Total Improvement Projects 25,000 22,500 22,500 -
Transfer IN from Citywide - 30% Share of Arterial - - - - Total Improvement Projects (Including Transfer IN) 25,000 22,500 22,500 - Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 15,688 (3,801) (20,641) (1,940) FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 60,894 $ 50,696 $ 40,253 $ 38,313 % of Operating Costs 98% 70% 55% 48%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 50,520 50,520 50,520 54,730
Total Parcels Levied 421 421 421 421
Assessment Rate 120 120 120 130
Maximum Assessment Rate 160 160 160 160

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 6 – WEST BRANCH
F-6
2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
Finance
FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 154,303 $ 160,521 $ 207,252 $ 212,400

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue 240,065 240,065 240,065 240,065
Return Funding - CIP - - - -
Interest 5,626 - - -
Other Revenue (Damage Reimbursement) - - - -
Other Revenue (Transfers from Citywide) 87,308 87,787 87,787 92,656 Total Revenues 332,999 327,852 327,852 332,721

EXPENDITURES
Personnel-Landscape 65,394 76,929 76,929 83,561
Personnel-Aquatics 11,667 12,836 12,836 13,398
Contracts 84,195 103,344 103,344 95,596
Utilities 82,673 82,900 82,900 104,300
Materials & Supplies 9 9,150 9,150 9,150
Indirect Costs 36,111 37,545 37,545 38,553
Total Expenditures 280,050 322,704 322,704 344,558
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 52,949 5,148 5,148 (11,837) Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 207,252 165,669 212,400 200,563 % of Operating Costs 74% 51% 66% 58%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

INTERIOR
CIP 300006 - Irrigation - - - -
CIP 300006 - Landscaping/Trees - - - -
CIP 300006 - Other Improvements - - - -

ARTERIAL
CIP 300006 - Irrigation - - - -
CIP 300006 - Landscaping/Trees - - - -
CIP 300006 - Fountains - - - -
CIP 300006 - Other Improvements - - - -
Total Improvement Projects - - - -
Transfer IN from Citywide - 30% Share of Arterial - - - - Total Improvement Projects (Including Transfer IN) - - - - Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 52,949 5,148 5,148 (11,837) FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 207,252 $ 165,669 $ 212,400 $ 200,563 % of Operating Costs 74% 51% 66% 58%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 240,065 240,065 240,065 240,065 Total Parcels Levied 631.75 631.75 631.75 631.75
Assessment Rate 380 380 380 380
Maximum Assessment Rate 380 380 380 380

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 7 - BENT CREEK
F-7
2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
Finance
FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 164,487 $ 133,101 $ 220,360 $ 203,152

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue 201,140 201,140 201,140 201,140
Return Funding - CIP 56,648 - - -
Interest 7,626 - - -
Other Revenue (Transfers from Citywide) 23,020 24,077 24,077 25,376 Total Revenues 288,434 225,217 225,217 226,516

EXPENDITURES
Personnel 43,073 48,864 48,864 41,541
Contracts 64,654 71,631 71,631 86,124
Utilities 66,358 87,000 87,000 88,000
Materials & Supplies 4,395 6,700 6,700 6,700
Indirect Costs 25,480 28,230 28,230 28,015
Total Expenditures 203,960 242,425 242,425 250,380
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 84,474 (17,208) (17,208) (23,864) Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 248,960 115,893 203,152 179,288 % of Operating Costs 122% 48% 84% 72%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

INTERIOR
CIP 300007 - Irrigation 5,000 - - -
CIP 300007 - Landscaping/Trees - - - -
CIP 300007 - Other Improvements 7,500 - - -

ARTERIAL
CIP 300007 - Irrigation - - - -
CIP 300007 - Landscaping/Trees 20,000 - - -
CIP 300007 - Other Improvements 3,000 - - -
Total Improvement Projects 35,500 - - -
Transfer IN from Citywide - 30% Share of Arterial (6,900) - - - Total Improvement Projects (Including Transfer IN) 28,600 - - - Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 55,874 (17,208) (17,208) (23,864) FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 220,360 $ 115,893 $ 203,152 $ 179,288 % of Operating Costs 108% 48% 84% 72%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 201,140 201,140 201,140 201,140 Total Parcels Levied 452 452 452 452
Assessment Rate 445 445 445 445
Maximum Assessment Rate 445 445 445 445

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 8 – DEERWOOD
F-8
2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
Finance
FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 52,479 $ 60,520 $ 99,284 $ 99,015

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue 64,379 63,900 73,485 73,485
Return Funding - CIP 5,970 - - -
Interest 2,133 - - -
Other Revenue (Transfers from Citywide) 50,846 31,394 31,394 33,971 Total Revenues 123,328 95,294 104,879 107,456

EXPENDITURES
Personnel 34,040 46,248 46,248 52,955
Contracts 4,451 9,189 9,189 10,112
Utilities 25,980 36,100 36,100 36,100
Materials & Supplies - 1,400 1,400 1,400
Indirect Costs 12,052 12,211 12,211 12,670
Total Expenditures 76,523 105,148 105,148 113,237
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 46,805 (9,854) (269) (5,781) Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 99,284 50,666 99,015 93,234 % of Operating Costs 130% 48% 94% 82%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

ARTERIAL
CIP 300008 - Irrigation - - - -
CIP 300008 - Landscaping/Trees - - - -
CIP 300008 - Other Improvements - - - -
Total Improvement Projects - - - -
Transfer IN from Citywide - 30% Share of Arterial - - - - Total Improvement Projects (Including Transfer IN) - - - - Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 46,805 (9,854) (269) (5,781) FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 99,284 $ 50,666 $ 99,015 $ 93,234 % of Operating Costs 130% 48% 94% 82%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 73,485 73,485 73,485 73,485
Total Parcels Levied 639 639 639 639
Assessment Rate 115 115 115 115
Maximum Assessment Rate 115 115 115 115

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 9 – COUNTRY VIEW
F-9
2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 48,018 $ 41,990 $ 39,282 $ 16,674

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue - 18,400 - 14,720
Return Funding - CIP - - - -
Interest 1,750 - - -
Other Revenue (Transfers from Citywide) 6,526 6,682 6,682 7,301 Total Revenues 8,276 25,082 6,682 22,021

EXPENDITURES
Personnel 2,399 2,794 2,794 2,979
Contracts 6,296 6,667 6,667 8,006
Utilities 5,041 9,400 9,400 9,800
Materials & Supplies 830 830 830 830
Indirect Costs 2,446 2,599 2,599 2,723
Total Expenditures 17,012 22,290 22,290 24,338
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance (8,735) 2,792 (15,608) (2,317) Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 39,282 44,782 23,674 14,357 % of Operating Costs 231% 201% 106% 59%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

ARTERIAL
CIP 300009 - Irrigation - 5,000 5,000 -
CIP 300009 - Landscaping/Trees - 5,000 5,000 -
CIP 300009 - Other Improvements - - - -
Total Improvement Projects - 10,000 10,000 -
Transfer IN from Citywide - 30% Share of Arterial - (3,000) (3,000) - Total Improvement Projects (Including Transfer IN) - 7,000 7,000 - Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance (8,735) (4,208) (22,608) (2,317) FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 39,282 $ 37,782 $ 16,674 $ 14,357 % of Operating Costs 231% 170% 75% 59%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 9,200 - - 14,720
Total Parcels Levied 184 184 184 184
Assessment Rate 50 - - 80
Maximum Assessment Rate 100 100 100 100

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 10 – OLD RANCH ESTATES
F-10
2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 25,850 $ 8,101 $ 9,202 $ 57,415

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue 44,880 43,520 47,600 51,680
Return Funding - CIP - - 50,000 -
Interest 939 - - -
Other Revenue (Transfers from Citywide) 2,457 2,537 2,537 3,126 Total Revenues 48,276 46,057 100,137 54,806

EXPENDITURES
Personnel 13,548 15,818 15,818 16,596
Contracts 13,716 16,773 16,773 21,028
Utilities 7,198 6,850 12,614 8,250
Materials & Supplies 650 1,350 1,350 1,350
Indirect Costs 4,813 5,369 5,369 5,950
Total Expenditures 39,925 46,160 51,924 53,174
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 8,351 (103) 48,213 1,632 Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 34,202 7,998 57,415 59,047 % of Operating Costs 86% 17% 111% 111%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

INTERIOR
CIP 300010 - Irrigation - - - -
CIP 300010 - Landscaping/Trees 25,000 - - -
CIP 300010 - Other Improvements - - - -

ARTERIAL
CIP 300010 - Irrigation - - - -
CIP 300010 - Landscaping/Trees - - - -
CIP 300010 - Other Improvements - - - -
Total Improvement Projects 25,000 - - -
Transfer IN from Citywide - 30% Share of Arterial - - - - Total Improvement Projects (Including Transfer IN) 25,000 - - - Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance (16,649) (103) 48,213 1,632 FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 9,202 $ 7,998 $ 57,415 $ 59,047 % of Operating Costs 23% 17% 111% 111%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 47,600 47,600 47,600 51,680
Total Parcels Levied 136 136 136 136
Assessment Rate 350 350 350 380
Maximum Assessment Rate 380 380 380 380

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 11 – VILLAGE PARKWAY
F-11
2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 53,514 $ 40,163 $ 66,107 $ 69,432

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue 24,100 16,870 26,510 26,510
Return Funding - CIP 17,520 - 5,977 -
Interest 2,140 - - -
Other Revenue (Transfers from Citywide) 11,551 12,418 12,418 13,457 Total Revenues 55,312 29,288 44,905 39,967

EXPENDITURES
Personnel 15,451 17,742 17,742 19,012
Contracts 8,289 11,557 11,557 13,176
Utilities 3,578 6,700 6,700 6,900
Materials & Supplies 572 750 750 750
Indirect Costs 4,329 4,830 4,830 5,019
Total Expenditures 32,219 41,579 41,579 44,857
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 23,092 (12,291) 3,326 (4,890) Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 76,607 27,872 69,432 64,542 % of Operating Costs 238% 67% 167% 144%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

ARTERIAL
CIP 300011 - Irrigation 15,000 - - -
CIP 300011 - Landscaping/Trees - - - 1,000
CIP 300011 - Other Improvements - - - -
Total Improvement Projects 15,000 - - 1,000
Transfer IN from Citywide - 30% Share of Arterial (4,500) - - (300) Total Improvement Projects (Including Transfer IN) 10,500 - - 700 Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 12,592 (12,291) 3,326 (5,590) FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 66,107 $ 27,872 $ 69,432 $ 63,842 % of Operating Costs 205% 67% 167% 142%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 24,100 26,510 26,510 26,510
Total Parcels Levied 241 241 241 241
Assessment Rate 100 110 110 110
Maximum Assessment Rate 110 110 110 110

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 12 – EL NIDO
F-12
2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 45,027 $ 34,355 $ 39,948 $ 39,804

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue 15,010 15,010 17,380 19,750
Return Funding - CIP - - 7,568 -
Interest 1,475 - - -
Other Revenue (Transfers from Citywide) 8,757 9,251 9,251 10,250 Total Revenues 25,242 24,261 34,199 30,000

EXPENDITURES
Personnel 8,046 9,319 9,319 9,608
Contracts 4,517 8,810 8,810 9,737
Utilities 9,225 8,500 11,916 10,300
Materials & Supplies - 700 700 700
Indirect Costs 3,282 3,598 3,598 3,823
Total Expenditures 25,071 30,927 34,343 34,168
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 171 (6,666) (144) (4,168) Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 45,198 27,689 39,804 35,636 % of Operating Costs 180% 90% 116% 104%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

ARTERIAL
CIP 300012 - Irrigation 7,500 - - -
CIP 300012 - Landscaping/Trees - - - 1,000
CIP 300012 - Other Improvements - - - -
Total Improvement Projects 7,500 - - 1,000
Transfer IN from Citywide - 30% Share of Arterial (2,250) - - (300) Total Improvement Projects (Including Transfer IN) 5,250 - - 700 Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance (5,079) (6,666) (144) (4,868) FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 39,948 $ 27,689 $ 39,804 $ 34,936 % of Operating Costs 159% 90% 116% 102%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 15,010 17,380 17,380 19,750
Total Parcels Levied 158 158 158 158
Assessment Rate 95 110 110 125
Maximum Assessment Rate 125 125 125 125

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 13 – CROWN RIDGE
F-13
2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 105,907 $ 89,595 $ 164,560 $ 149,782

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue 78,000 75,920 81,120 81,120
Return Funding - CIP 45,454 - - -
Interest 4,845 - - -
Other Revenue (Transfers from Citywide) 20,274 21,270 21,270 21,182 Total Revenues 148,572 97,190 102,390 102,302

EXPENDITURES
Personnel 22,563 25,228 25,228 17,357
Contracts 28,008 30,850 30,850 36,630
Utilities 20,345 42,000 42,000 42,000
Materials & Supplies 350 2,800 2,800 2,800
Indirect Costs 12,153 13,290 13,290 12,446
Total Expenditures 83,420 114,168 114,168 111,233
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 65,153 (16,978) (11,778) (8,931) Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 171,060 72,617 152,782 140,851 % of Operating Costs 205% 64% 134% 127%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

INTERIOR
CIP 300013 - Irrigation - - - -
CIP 300013 - Landscaping/Trees 3,000 3,000 3,000 -
CIP 300013 - Other Improvements - - - -

ARTERIAL
CIP 300013 - Irrigation 5,000 - - -
CIP 300013 - Landscaping/Trees - - - -
CIP 300013 - Other Improvements - - - -
Total Improvement Projects 8,000 3,000 3,000 -
Transfer IN from Citywide - 30% Share of Arterial (1,500) - - - Total Improvement Projects (Including Transfer IN) 6,500 3,000 3,000 - Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 58,653 (19,978) (14,778) (8,931) FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 164,560 $ 69,617 $ 149,782 $ 140,851 % of Operating Costs 197% 61% 131% 127%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 78,000 81,120 81,120 81,120
Total Parcels Levied 104 104 104 104
Assessment Rate 750 780 780 780
Maximum Assessment Rate 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 14 – FOUR OAKS
F-14
2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 23,590 $ 21,782 $ 23,877 $ 21,314

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue 10,325 10,325 10,325 10,325
Return Funding - CIP - - - -
Interest 811 - - -
Other Revenue (Transfers from Citywide) 5,200 5,497 5,497 6,036 Total Revenues 16,336 15,822 15,822 16,361

EXPENDITURES
Personnel 6,113 6,196 6,196 6,435
Contracts 4,903 5,251 5,251 6,335
Utilities 3,083 4,200 4,200 4,500
Materials & Supplies - 600 600 600
Indirect Costs 1,949 2,138 2,138 2,251
Total Expenditures 16,049 18,385 18,385 20,121
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 287 (2,563) (2,563) (3,760) Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 23,877 19,219 21,314 17,554 % of Operating Costs 149% 105% 116% 87%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

ARTERIAL
CIP 300014 - Irrigation - - - -
CIP 300014 - Landscaping/Trees - - - -
CIP 300014 - Other Improvements - - - -
Total Improvement Projects - - - -
Transfer IN from Citywide - 30% Share of Arterial - - - - Total Improvement Projects (Including Transfer IN) - - - - Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 287 (2,563) (2,563) (3,760) FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 23,877 $ 19,219 $ 21,314 $ 17,554 % of Operating Costs 149% 105% 116% 87%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 10,325 10,325 10,325 10,325
Unit Factors 59 59 59 59
Assessment Rate 175 175 175 175
Maximum Assessment Rate 175 175 175 175

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 15 – CIRCLE E
F-15
2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 50,831 $ 40,760 $ 40,685 $ 45,537

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue 22,950 38,250 34,425 35,955
Return Funding - CIP - - 9,337 -
Interest 1,929 - - -
Other Revenue (Transfers from Citywide) 3,917 4,159 4,159 4,504 Total Revenues 28,796 42,409 47,921 40,459

EXPENDITURES
Personnel 9,481 10,571 10,571 11,136
Contracts 3,950 6,200 6,200 7,010
Utilities 15,309 18,735 18,735 20,135
Materials & Supplies 750 2,550 2,550 2,550
Indirect Costs 4,451 5,013 5,013 5,144
Total Expenditures 33,941 43,069 43,069 45,975
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance (5,146) (660) 4,852 (5,516) Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 45,685 40,100 45,537 40,021 % of Operating Costs 135% 93% 106% 87%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

INTERIOR
CIP 300015 - Irrigation - - - -
CIP 300015 - Landscaping/Trees - - - -
CIP 300015 - Other Improvements 5,000 - - -

ARTERIAL
CIP 300015 - Irrigation - - - -
CIP 300015 - Landscaping/Trees - - - 3,000
CIP 300015 - Other Improvements - - - -
Total Improvement Projects 5,000 - - 3,000
Transfer IN from Citywide - 30% Share of Arterial - - - (900) Total Improvement Projects (Including Transfer IN) 5,000 - - 2,100 Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance (10,146) (660) 4,852 (7,616) FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 40,685 $ 40,100 $ 45,537 $ 37,921 % of Operating Costs 120% 93% 106% 82%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 30,600 34,425 34,425 35,955
Total Parcels Levied 153 153 153 153
Assessment Rate 200 225 225 235
Maximum Assessment Rate 300 300 300 300

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 16 - THOMAS RANCH
F-16
2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 20,416 $ 17,054 $ 23,210 $ 21,253

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue 9,100 5,034 10,500 11,900
Return Funding - CIP - - 268 -
Interest 691 - - -
Other Revenue (Transfers from Citywide) 5,341 5,425 5,425 6,100 Total Revenues 15,132 10,459 16,193 18,000

EXPENDITURES
Personnel 3,542 5,789 5,789 6,913
Contracts 4,318 4,601 4,601 5,494
Utilities 2,127 4,900 4,900 4,900
Materials & Supplies 350 750 750 750
Indirect Costs 2,002 2,110 2,110 2,275
Total Expenditures 12,338 18,150 18,150 20,332
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 2,794 (7,691) (1,957) (2,332) Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 23,210 9,363 21,253 18,921 % of Operating Costs 188% 52% 117% 93%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

ARTERIAL
CIP 300016 - Irrigation - - - -
CIP 300016 - Landscaping/Trees - - - 1,000
CIP 300016 - Other Improvements - - - -
Total Improvement Projects - - - 1,000
Transfer IN from Citywide - 30% Share of Arterial - - - (300) Total Improvement Projects (Including Transfer IN) - - - 700 Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 2,794 (7,691) (1,957) (3,032) FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 23,210 $ 9,363 $ 21,253 $ 18,221 % of Operating Costs 188% 52% 117% 90%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 9,100 10,500 10,500 11,900
Total Parcels Levied 140 140 140 140
Assessment Rate 65 75 75 85
Maximum Assessment Rate 100 100 100 100

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 17 - HENRY RANCH
F-17
2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
Finance FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 89,343 $ 79,413 $ 100,457 $ 66,992

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue 27,750 22,950 22,950 28,050
Return Funding - CIP 843 - - -
Interest 2,992 - - -
Damage Reimbursement - - - -
Other Revenue (Transfers from Citywide) 14,091 15,142 15,142 15,697 Total Revenues 45,676 38,092 38,092 43,747

EXPENDITURES
Personnel 6,774 7,578 7,578 8,031
Contracts 7,520 17,189 17,189 18,539
Utilities 14,538 19,150 19,150 19,150
Materials & Supplies 450 750 750 750
Indirect Costs 5,281 5,890 5,890 5,855
Total Expenditures 34,562 50,557 50,557 52,325
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 11,113 (12,465) (12,465) (8,578) Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 100,457 66,948 87,992 58,414 % of Operating Costs 291% 132% 174% 112%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

ARTERIAL
CIP 300017 - Irrigation - - - -
CIP 300017 - Landscaping/Trees - - - -
CIP 300017 - Other Improvements - - 30,000 -
Total Improvement Projects - - 30,000 -
Transfer from Citywide - 30% Share of Arterial - - (9,000) - Total Improvement Projects (Including Transfer IN) - - 21,000 - Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 11,113 (12,465) (33,465) (8,578) FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 100,457 $ 66,948 $ 66,992 $ 58,414 % of Operating Costs 291% 132% 133% 112%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 22,950 22,950 22,950 28,050
Total Parcels Levied 102 102 102 102
Assessment Rate 225 225 225 275
Maximum Assessment Rate 375 375 375 375

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 18 - OLD RANCH SUMMIT
F-18
2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
Finance FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 50,421 $ 32,904 $ 31,142 $ 26,444

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue 10,800 27,000 18,900 21,600
Return Funding - CIP - - - -
Interest 1,897 - - -
Other Revenue (Transfers from Citywide) 1,707 1,828 1,828 2,089 Total Revenues 14,404 28,828 20,728 23,689

EXPENDITURES
Personnel 8,654 7,809 7,809 7,744
Contracts 3,084 8,408 8,408 9,489
Utilities 4,194 5,950 5,950 6,350
Materials & Supplies 150 300 300 300
Indirect Costs 2,600 2,959 2,959 3,009
Total Expenditures 18,682 25,426 25,426 26,892
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance (4,278) 3,402 (4,698) (3,203) Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 46,142 36,306 26,444 23,241 % of Operating Costs 247% 143% 104% 86%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

INTERIOR
CIP 300004 - Irrigation - - - -
CIP 300004 - Landscaping/Trees 15,000 - - -
CIP 300004 - Other Improvements - - - -

ARTERIAL
CIP 300004 - Irrigation - - - -
CIP 300004 - Landscaping/Trees - - - -
CIP 300004 - Other Improvements - - - -
Total Improvement Projects 15,000 - - -
Transfer from Citywide - 30% Share of Arterial - - - -
Total Improvement Projects (Including Transfer IN) 15,000 - - - Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance (19,278) 3,402 (4,698) (3,203) FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 31,142 $ 36,306 $ 26,444 $ 23,241 % of Operating Costs 167% 143% 104% 86%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 18,900 18,900 18,900 21,600
Total Parcels Levied 54 54 54 54
Assessment Rate 350 350 350 400
Maximum Assessment Rate 1,858 1,858 1,858 1,858

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) FY 2025/26 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT
ZONE 19 - GLASS HOUSE
F-19
2023/24 (LY)
Final
2024/25 (CY)
Adopted
2024/25 (CY)
Revised
2025/26
Proposed -
FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 $ 13,707 $ 9,288 $ 19,080 $ 18,925

REVENUES
Assessment Revenue 14,836 14,656 15,802 16,118
Return Funding - CIP 7,599 - - -
Interest 699 - - -
Other Revenue (Transfers from Citywide) - - - -
Total Revenues 23,134 14,656 15,802 16,118

EXPENDITURES
Personnel 3,300 3,672 3,672 3,900
Contracts 5,258 7,228 7,228 8,308
Utilities 2,527 2,750 2,750 3,300
Materials & Supplies - 450 450 450
Indirect Costs 1,677 1,857 1,857 2,011
Total Expenditures 12,761 15,957 15,957 17,969
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 10,372 (1,301) (155) (1,851) Fund Balance w/o Project Costs 24,080 7,987 18,925 17,074 % of Operating Costs 189% 50% 119% 95%

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS

INTERIOR
CIP 300004 - Irrigation - - - -
CIP 300004 - Landscaping/Trees 5,000 - - 1,000
CIP 300004 - Other Improvements - - - -
Total Improvement Projects 5,000 - - 1,000
Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance 5,372 (1,301) (155) (2,851) FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 19,080 $ 7,987 $ 18,925 $ 16,074 % of Operating Costs 150% 50% 119% 89%

LEVY INFORMATION
Total Special Assessment 15,492.17 15,802.01 15,802.01 16,118.05 Total Parcels Levied 3 3 3 3
Assessment Rate (rate varies by parcel) 15,492.17 15,802.01 15,802.01 16,118.05 Maximum Assessment Rate 15,492.17 15,802.01 15,802.01 16,118.05

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) G
-1

APPENDIXG
Zone
Number
Zone Name
Proposed
Unit
Factors
FY 2024/25
Levied Rate
Per Unit
FY 2025/26
Proposed
Rate Per
Unit
FY 2025/26 Max
Rate Per Unit
FY 2025/26
Estimated
Revenue 1 Citywide Street Lighting 26,515.50 35.27 35.98 35.98 954,028 2 Citywide Landscaping 24,881.25 76.21 77.73 77.73 1,934,020 3 Canyon Lakes 3,011.75 80 80 110 240,940 4 Vista San Ramon 161 394 300 405 48,300 5 Summerwood Loop 421 120 130 160 54,730 6 West Branch 631.75 380 380 380 240,065 7 Bent Creek 452 445 445 445 201,140 8 Deerwood 639 115 115 115 73,485 9 Country View 184 - 80 100 14,720 10 Old Ranch Estates 136 350 380 380 51,680
11 Village Parkway 241 110 110 110 26,510
12 El Nido 158 110 125 125 19,750
13 Crown Ridge 104 780 780 1,000 81,120
14 Four Oaks 59 175 175 175 10,325
15 Circle E 153 225 235 300 35,955
16 Thomas Ranch 140 75 85 100 11,900
17 Henry Ranch 102 225 275 375 28,050
18 Old Ranch Summit 54 350 400 1,858 21,600
Glass House (SR) 1 8,327.66 8,494.21 8,494.21
Brave Church (CH) 1 1,358.98 1,386.16 1,386.16
Valley Vista (VV) 1 6,115.38 6,237.69 6,237.69
4,064,435
*The owners of the three Zone 19 parcels were responsible for paying the Zone 1 and Zone 2 assessments prior to the formation of Zone 19. Therefore, these three parcels are included in the Zone 1 and Zone 2 unit factors and revenue estimates above, in addition to the Zone 19 assessment and revenue estimates. *SR - City of San Ramon, CH - Brave Church, VV - Valley Vista Senior Housing

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENTS

ASSESSMENT PER UNIT FACTOR BY SPECIAL ZONE
19* 16,118.05
Total Assessment Revenue:

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984) G-2
Per Unit FY
2024/25
Per Unit FY
2025/26
Per Unit
Change
$35.27 $35.98 $0.71
$191.48 $193.71 $2.23
$505.48 $413.71 -$91.77
$231.48 $243.71 $12.23
$491.48 $493.71 $2.23
$556.48 $558.71 $2.23
$226.48 $228.71 $2.23
$111.48 $193.71 $82.23
$461.48 $493.71 $32.23
$221.48 $223.71 $2.23
$221.48 $238.71 $17.23
$891.48 $893.71 $2.23
$286.48 $288.71 $2.23
$336.48 $348.71 $12.23
$186.48 $198.71 $12.23
$336.48 $388.71 $52.23
$461.48 $513.71 $52.23
$8,439.14 $8,607.92
$1,470.46 $1,499.87
$6,226.86 $6,351.40
$111.48 $113.71 $2.23
The Zone 1 and Zone 2 assessments for these parcels are accounted for separately from the Zone 19 assessments.

Therefore, no increase for Zone 1 and Zone 2 are showing under Zone 19.

8.2.a
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: A - FY 2025-26 Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1984-1 Engineer's Report (2025-072 : Public Hearing - L&L 1984)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 10, 2025
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Debbie Chamberlain, Community Development Director By: Ryan Driscoll, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-073 - Repealing and Replacing the Climate Action Plan, in its entirety, as adopted by Resolution No. 2011-094, and Adopting the Updated Climate Action Plan (CAP) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions Thresholds and Guidance Report

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Final Climate Action Plan (CAP) (Attachment A) is the City’s primary implementation strategy (roadmap) of the General Plan 2040 to establish a long-term greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction plan, consistent with State GHG reduction targets for 2030 and 2045.

The CAP has been developed through an iterative process based on comments provided by the public, the CAP Task Force (Task Force), the Planning Commission, and informed by the 2019 GHG Inventory and the 2030 and 2045 GHG forecasts and targets. The CAP establishes 24 GHG Reduction Measures in seven (7) emissions categories, GHG emissions reduction potential, City/community cost tier categories (high, moderate, low), and co-benefits.

The CAP also incorporates tracked change revisions based on the oral and written public comments (Attachment C) received during the 30-day public review and comment period for the Public Review Draft of the CAP Update, and the feedback provided by the Task Force and Planning Commission.

Central to the CAP implementation strategy is the creation of a sustainability position, which requires separate City Council direction through the budget review process currently anticipated for midyear FY 26. This position will provide dedicated oversight to ensure the CAP strategies are effectively integrated into the City's operations, and that San Ramon remains on track to achieve its GHG emissions reduction targets.

The foundation for long-term success in implementing the CAP is that it adapts to new information and changing conditions, thereby ensuring its long-term effectiveness. Given the long timeframe and inherent uncertainty with CAP implementation, including funding pathways and the ongoing State regulatory landscape, the CAP incorporates regular monitoring (biennial tracking/reporting and climate dashboard), as required by General Plan 2040 Policy 12.9-I-3, to assess the progress of CAP implementation. Furthermore, to comply with Policy 12.9-I-3, it is

9.1 Packet Pg. 181
anticipated the City will commence an updated GHG emissions inventory along with a future CAP update in 2029 to allow the City to refine the CAP, as needed, in response to implementation progress, changes in State regulations, changes in assumptions, and to demonstrate consistency with the State 2045 carbon neutrality target.

Lastly, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) GHG Emissions Thresholds and Guidance Report (Attachment B) streamlines future long-range planning projects or development projects approved by December 31, 2030. These types of projects would be consistent with the CAP if they demonstrate consistency with the established GHG emissions analysis thresholds.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council receive the staff report, accept public comment, and adopt this Resolution to adopt the updated San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP) and the CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds and Guidance Report.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Public Outreach/Notification
On May 30, 2025, City staff posted a notice of a City Council public hearing for June 10, 2025 at least 10 days prior to the hearing in three public places within the City limits. In addition, because the draft Climate Action Plan is a Citywide plan, involving greater than 1,000 notices, a courtesy newspaper notice was published on May 30, 2025 in the San Ramon Valley Times, at least 10 days prior to the hearing.

Additionally, on May 30, 2025, a City Council public hearing notice for June 10, 2025 was posted on the City’s Official Meetings and Notice webpage, posted on the City CAP webpage, posted on the CAP Update website (www.plansanramon.com), emailed to the applicable General Plan 2040/CAP stakeholders, all known interested parties, and the PlanSanRamon website contact list.

Background:

In 2021, a City-initiated Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update began as part of the General Plan 2040 Project. In Fall 2021, the City conducted an online community survey soliciting public input on the General Plan 2040 Project and the CAP Update. However, due to State law timing requirements for adoption of the updated Housing Element (State certification in February 2023), the General Plan 2040 was adopted in December 2023 and the CAP Update was scheduled to follow afterwards.

The CAP Update is the primary implementation strategy of the General Plan 2040 to establish a long-term GHG emission reduction plan, consistent with State GHG reduction targets for 2030 and 2045. Additionally, the General Plan 2040 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Mitigation Measure GHG-1 requires the City to adopt and implement an updated, qualified CAP, which is a

9.1 Packet Pg. 182
“qualified GHG reduction strategy” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) based on local conditions.

Subsequent to the formation of the Climate Action Plan Task Force (Task Force) by the City Council in May 2024, the Task Force met at four (4) public meetings, between June 2024 and October 2024, and provided feedback on the development of the updated CAP. Additionally, the Planning Commission met at two (2) public meetings in October and November 2024 and provided feedback on the development of the updated CAP.

On April 16, 2025, the City published the Public Review Draft of the CAP Update for a 30-day public review and comment period through May 15, 2025 at 5:00 PM. During the public review and comment period, the Task Force held a public meeting on April 24, 2025, received public comment, provided feedback and voted to endorse of the Public Review Draft of the CAP Update to the Planning Commission and City Council with minor comments to clarify certain terms, consider future CAP updates earlier than the 4-to-8-year timeline established by General Plan 2040 Policy 12.9-I-3, and consider adding potential GHG emission reduction information to CAP Table 35.

Additionally, during the public review and comment period, the Planning Commission held a public meeting on the Public Review Draft of the CAP Update on May 6, 2025, received public comment, provided feedback on the CAP Update implementation and recommended City Council approval of the Public Review Draft of the CAP Update. The Task Force and Planning Commission public meeting agenda packets are available online at:

Task Force Meeting Agenda Packets:

June 27, 2024: https://sanramonca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_Meeting.aspx?ID=4967 July 25, 2024: https://sanramonca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_Meeting.aspx?ID=4988 September 19, 2024: https://sanramonca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_Meeting.aspx?ID=5012 October 30, 2024: https://sanramonca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_Meeting.aspx?ID=5049 April 24, 2025: https://sanramonca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_Meeting.aspx?ID=5158 Planning Commission Meeting Agenda Packets:

October 15, 2024: https://sanramonca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_Meeting.aspx?ID=5037 November 19, 2024: https://sanramonca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_Meeting.aspx?ID=5052 May 6, 2025: https://sanramonca.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_Meeting.aspx?ID=5163 Final CAP
The Final CAP (CAP) has been developed by staff and the consultant team through an iterative process based on the comments provided by the public, the Task Force, the Planning Commission, and informed by the 2019 GHG Inventory and 2030 and 2045 GHG forecasts and targets. (Attachment A)
The CAP incorporates tracked change revisions based on the oral and written public comments (Attachment C) received during the 30-day public review and comment period for the Public

9.1 Packet Pg. 183
Review Draft of the CAP Update, and the feedback provided by the Task Force and Planning Commission.

The CAP consists of the following chapters and topics:

1. Introduction
• Vision and Purpose
• Scientific Context and Impacts
• Community Engagement and Outreach Summary

2. Current and Projected GHG Emissions
• San Ramon GHG Emissions Inventory
• San Ramon GHG Emissions Forecasts
• State Context and San Ramon GHG Emissions Targets

3. GHG Reduction Measure Framework
• Summarizes GHG Reduction Measures and insights related:
o GHG emissions reduction potential
o City/community cost tier categories (high, moderate, low) o Co-benefits
4 – 10. Sector Strategies
• Establishes 24 GHG Reduction Measures

11. Implementation and Monitoring
• Timeframe
• Responsibility by City Department
• Monitoring Metrics
The CAP is a roadmap for the City of San Ramon to achieve the 2030 GHG emissions reduction target and make progress towards the 2045 carbon neutrality target through the implementation of established GHG Reduction Measures. The 24 GHG Reduction Measures have been designed and form the basis of the GHG emissions reduction plan to achieve San Ramon’s fair share of GHG emissions reductions and demonstrate consistency with State GHG reduction targets for 2030 and 2045. The 24 GHG Reduction Measures are identified by the following seven (7) sector strategies by emissions category:
• Cornerstone
• Energy
• Transportation
• Waste
• Water and Wastewater
• Implementation by City

9.1 Packet Pg. 184
• Nature-based Carbon Sequestration
Implementation and Monitoring
The foundation for long-term success in implementing the CAP is that it adapts to new information and changing conditions, thereby ensuring its long-term effectiveness. As required by General Plan 2040 Policy 12.9-I-3, the CAP incorporates regular monitoring (biennial tracking/reporting and climate dashboard) to assess the progress of CAP implementation. To begin the CAP implementation process, the following outlines the City’s next steps:
1) Step 1: Adopt the CAP
2) Step 2: Create/Hire Sustainability Position
Recognizing the challenges of implementation and coordination, Measure IMP-2 establishes a key strategic step, the creation of a full-time sustainability position(s). City Council direction is required, through the budget review process, to implement Measure IMP-2. This position will be dedicated to overseeing the citywide implementation of the CAP with cross-departmental collaboration from multiple City departments, consolidating information for progress monitoring and reporting, conducting regular community engagement, and manage future updates to the CAP. This dedicated oversight is intended to ensure that the CAP's strategies are effectively integrated into the City's operations, and that San Ramon remains on track to achieve its GHG emissions reduction targets.
3) Step 3: Develop a CAP Implementation Workplan
The sustainability position staff member will develop a CAP implementation workplan based on:
• The CAP long-term phased approach, incorporating the following:
o Phase 1, short-term between 2025 to 2026
o Phase 2, mid-term between 2027 to 2030
o Phase 3, long-term after 2030
• Broad scope Citywide in seven (7) emission sector categories • Each Measure implementation timeframe, responsible City department(s), and monitoring metrics (CAP Table 35)
• Coordinate individual Measure funding pathways (Citywide, grant funding, etc.) • Future City Council direction to allocate City resources (i.e. staffing, funding, etc.) • Future City Council direction to implement specific Measures (i.e. reach codes) that may include additional feasibility analysis and/or additional cost refinement based on cost implications to the City and/or community Many elements of the Measures (i.e. bike infrastructure, housing within the City core) overlap with long-term goals and policies already implemented by the City through the General Plan, Bike Master Plan, or other long-term plans.

9.1 Packet Pg. 185
The CAP implementation workplan can also accommodate any future City Council direction regarding the potential formation of a permanent climate/environmental committee. The CAP Task Force met on May 29, 2025, to discuss the potential role and makeup for a standing committee. After discussion and feedback the Task Force agreed to meet again to finalize their recommendations based on additional feedback from staff.

Future CAP Updates
To address the inherent uncertainty with CAP implementation, including funding pathways and the ongoing State regulatory landscape, General Plan 2040 Policy 12.9-I-3 requires an updated GHG emissions inventory and an update to the CAP every 4 to 8 years. It is anticipated that the City will commence a future CAP update in 2029 to allow the City to refine the CAP, as needed, based on implementation progress, potential changes in State regulations, changes to assumptions (i.e. technology advancements, adoption rates, and technology costs), and to demonstrate consistency with the State 2045 carbon neutrality target.

While the Task Force provided a comment to consider future CAP updates earlier than the 4-to8-year timeline established by General Plan 2040, City staff supports maintaining the established 4-to-8-year timeline because there is an approximate 1-to-2-year lag time when obtaining updated GHG inventory data that also contributes to the time needed to see meaningful GHG emissions changes as a result of Measure implementation. Additionally, devoting extensive staff time and City resources towards future CAP updates earlier than every 4 years results in reduced City resources towards implementation of CAP Measures.

Environmental Review/California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) The CAP and the CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds and Guidance Report (Attachment B) are consistent with the San Ramon 2040 General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (SCH# 2022060549), including the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) (www.sanramon.ca.gov/GP2040EIR). The MMRP contains Mitigation Measure GHG-1 which requires the City to adopt and implement an updated, qualified CAP, incorporating the components of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183.5 for a “qualified GHG reduction strategy,” based on local conditions and in accordance with all requirements of CEQA of 1970, as amended.

Once the CAP and the CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds and Guidance Report are adopted, as a “qualified GHG reduction strategy,” future long-range planning projects or development projects that are consistent with the demographic projections and land use assumptions can streamline the CEQA GHG emissions analysis if entitlement/approval occurs by December 31, 2030. In doing so, these projects would result in less-than-significant GHG emissions and would not result in a cumulatively considerable GHG emissions impact.

As part of a future CAP update required by General Plan 2040 Policy 12.9-I-3, anticipated to commence in 2029, the CEQA GHG Emissions Threshold and Guidance Report would need to

9.1 Packet Pg. 186
be updated to continue the establishment of thresholds for the streamlining of applicable projects at project entitlement/approval beyond 2030.

Planning Commission Final Review
On May 6, 2025, the Planning Commission held a public meeting on the Public Review Draft of the CAP Update, received public comment, and provided feedback on the CAP implementation and recommended City Council approval of the Public Review Draft of the CAP Update.

Specifically, the Planning Commission comments focused CAP implementation towards developing a workplan that incorporates City resources appropriate to provide staffing and funding strategies that focus initially on Phase 1 Measures (i.e. energy and transportation) that are realistically feasible and provide the largest GHG emissions reductions.

CAP Update Public Review Draft – Late Communication
After the 30-day public review and comment period for the Public Review Draft of the CAP Update, written late communication was received (Attachment D). The overarching intent of the CAP is to provide a comprehensive strategy to reduce GHG emissions communitywide. The CAP is designed to complement and build upon the City's existing planning documents, such as the General Plan, Bicycle Master Plan, CityWalk Master Plan, and others. These plans address various aspects of the city's development and have their own long-range implementation strategies and decision-making processes, which will continue concurrently. For instance, land use decisions are primarily guided by the General Plan and associated zoning processes, which are distinct from the direct scope of the CAP's implementation actions, though the CAP's goals are intended to inform those processes.

FISCAL IMPACTS
The contract cost for preparing the update to the CAP and the staff time associated with updating the CAP is funded through the General Fund.

STEPS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
Upon adoption of the draft resolution, the CAP and CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds and Guidance Report become effective immediately. Implementation of the adopted CAP will begin.

ATTACHMENT
A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025
B: CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds and Guidance Report, June 10, 2025 C: Written Public Comment Received During 30-day CAP Update Public Review Draft Period D: Late Communication Received After 30-day CAP Update Public Review Draft Period

9.1 Packet Pg. 187
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-073

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAMON

REPEALING AND REPLACING THE CLIMATE ACTION PLAN, IN ITS ENTIRETY, AS ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 2011-094, AND ADOPTING THE UPDATED

CLIMATE ACTION PLAN (CAP) AND THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL

QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) EMISSIONS THRESHOLDS

AND GUIDANCE REPORT
WHEREAS, global climate change is an issue that the State of California has determined to be of statewide concern that mandates local action throughout all of California; and WHEREAS, with the enactment of Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, local governments are tasked with addressing emission sources under their purview that contribute to climate change; and WHEREAS, the San Ramon General Plan provides an avenue for local government actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with new and existing development and provide consistency with AB 32 and other applicable climate-related State law; and WHEREAS, on August 23, 2011, the City of San Ramon City Council adopted Resolution No. 2011-094, adopting the first San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP) as the primary implementation strategy to address climate change locally and comply with the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets associated with AB 32; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Ramon achieved and exceeded the 2011 CAP total community GHG emissions reduction target (15 percent below 2008 levels by the year 2020) by achieving a 22 percent community GHG emissions reduction by 2019; and WHEREAS, in 2021, the City initiated an update to the Climate Action Plan (CAP Update) as part of the San Ramon General Plan 2040 Project (GPA 2023-0002; RZ 2023-0002; PZ 2023-0001; SP 2023-0001; ENVR 2023-0003); and
WHEREAS, the CAP Update was deferred from the San Ramon General Plan 2040 Project and continued through a subsequent review process; and WHEREAS, on December 12, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-132 certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2022060549) for the General Plan 2040 Project (GPA 2023-0002; RZ 2023-0002; PZ 2023-0001; SP 2023- 0001; ENVR 2023-0003) based on CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations determining Alternative 2 (New Infill Mixed Use within the City Core and Additional Retail Shopping Alternative) as the preferred alternative for San Ramon General Plan 2040 Project and included a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP); and WHEREAS, on December 12, 2023, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-133

9.1 Packet Pg. 188
approving the San Ramon General Plan 2040 Project (GPA 2023-0002; RZ 2023-0002; PZ 2023-0001; SP 2023-0001; ENVR 2023-0003) with errata changes, and associated specific plan and Municipal Code Zoning Ordinance amendments and Zoning Map changes; and WHEREAS, General Plan 2040 Policies 12.9-I-1 and 12.9-I-2 require the City to keep current and maintain the City’s adopted CAP, as an implementation strategy of the General Plan 2040, consistent with the State GHG emissions reduction targets for the years 2030 and 2045; and
WHEREAS, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the certified General Plan 2040 Project Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2022060549) contains Mitigation Measure GHG-1 which requires the City to adopt and implement an updated, qualified CAP and CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds for San Ramon in accordance with all requirements of CEQA of 1970, as amended; and Regarding the Public Review Process
WHEREAS, on September 9, 2021, the City held a virtual Community Workshop and gave an overview of the 2023-2031 Housing Element, San Ramon General Plan 2040 Project, and Climate Action Plan Update with the community and solicited comments on the City’s proposed Updates; and
WHEREAS, on September 15, 2021 through October 21, 2021, the City conducted an online Community Survey soliciting input from the public on the 2023-2031 Housing Element, San Ramon General Plan 2040 Project, and Climate Action Plan Update; and WHEREAS, in September 2021, the City created a dedicated website at www.plansanramon.com for the 2023-2031 Housing Element, San Ramon General Plan 2040 Project, and Climate Action Plan Update that serves as a landing place for information; and WHEREAS, on January 23, 2024 and May 28, 2024, the City Council formed the Climate Action Plan Task Force (Task Force), comprised of seven (7) members and two (2) alternate members, for the following prescribed purpose (tasks):
(1) To work with staff to provide public input and update the City’s Climate Action Plan. (2) Once the Climate Action Plan is adopted, the Task Force will draft a charter for Council consideration for a permanent environmental committee.

WHEREAS, the Task Force held four (4) public meetings on the following dates, received public comment, and provided feedback for consideration on the development of the CAP Update:
• June 27, 2024
• July 25, 2024
• September 19, 2024
• October 30, 2024

9.1 Packet Pg. 189
WHEREAS, on October 4, 2024, a public notice of the October 15, 2024 Planning Commission public meeting study session to discuss the CAP Update was posted on the City’s website, posted on the CAP Update website (www.plansanramon.com), and emailed/mailed to the applicable General Plan 2040/CAP stakeholders, all known interested parties, retail shopping center owners, property owners, and the PlanSanRamon website contact list; and WHEREAS, on October 15, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public meeting study session, received public comment, and provided feedback for consideration on the development of the CAP Update; and
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2024, a public notice of the November 19, 2024 Planning Commission public meeting study session to discuss the CAP Update was posted on the City’s website, posted on the CAP Update website (www.plansanramon.com), and emailed to the applicable General Plan 2040/CAP stakeholders, all known interested parties, and the PlanSanRamon website contact list; and
WHEREAS, on November 19, 2024, the Planning Commission held a public meeting study session, received public comment, and provided feedback for consideration on the development of the CAP Update; and
WHEREAS, on April 16, 2025, the City published the Public Review Draft of the CAP Update, including the CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds and Guidance Report, for a 30-day public review and comment period through May 15, 2025 at 5:00 PM; and WHEREAS, on April 16, 2025, the City conducted the following outreach and notification for the 30-day public review and comment period for the Public Review Draft of the CAP Update, including: published the documents on the City CAP webpage and the CAP Update website (www.plansanramon.com), provided hard copies of the documents at City Hall and both San Ramon Libraries, published a newspaper notice in the San Ramon Valley Times, included information in the City weekly news & information emails, emailed the applicable General Plan 2040/CAP stakeholders, all known interested parties, and the PlanSanRamon website contact list, and conducted on-going social media outreach; and
WHEREAS, on April 16, 2025, a public notice of the May 6, 2025 Planning Commission public meeting to discuss the CAP Update was published in the San Ramon Valley Times, posted on the City’s website, posted on the CAP Update website (www.plansanramon.com), emailed the applicable General Plan 2040/CAP stakeholders, all known interested parties, and the PlanSanRamon website contact list; and
WHEREAS, on April 24, 2025, the Task Force held their fifth (5th) public meeting on the development of the CAP Update, received public comment, and provided feedback for consideration on the Public Review Draft of the CAP Update; furthermore, the Task Force voted to “endorse the Climate Action Draft with the minor and agreed to changes discussed with City Staff during the meeting,” which was provided to the Planning Commission and City Council; and

9.1 Packet Pg. 190
WHEREAS, on May 6, 2025, the Planning Commission held a public meeting on the CAP Update, including Public Review Draft of the CAP Update, received public comment, and provided feedback on the CAP Update implementation and recommended City Council approval of the Public Review Draft of the CAP Update; and
WHEREAS, on May 30, 2025, a notice of the June 10, 2025 City Council public hearing to consider adoption of the CAP Update was posted at least 10 days prior to the hearing in three public places within the City limits, published in the San Ramon Valley Times, posted on the City’s Official Meetings and Notice webpage, posted on the City CAP webpage, posted on the CAP Update website (www.plansanramon.com <http://www.plansanramon.com>), emailed to the applicable General Plan 2040/CAP stakeholders, all known interested parties, and the PlanSanRamon website contact list; and
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider adoption of the CAP Update, including the CAP document dated June 10, 2025 (Attachment A), and the CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds and Guidance Report dated June 10, 2025 (Attachment B), incorporating all tracked change revisions based on oral and written public comment received during the 30-day public review and comment period through May 15, 2025, feedback provided by the Task Force and the Planning Commission, received public comment, and closed the public comment for the CAP Update; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council finds that the recitals above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council after independent consideration and independently exercising its judgment in evaluating all of the aforesaid materials, facts and testimony does hereby find that, based on substantial evidence in the record:

1. Regarding the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA):
a. The recitals above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference; and b. The CAP Update, including the Final CAP document, the CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds and Guidance Report, and the GHG Reduction Measures Quantification and Substantial Evidence (CAP - Appendix D), are consistent with the scope analyzed by the certified San Ramon 2040 General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2022060549), the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), and related CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations associated with City Council Resolution No. 2023-132, which are incorporated herein by reference, in accordance with all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), as amended, will not result in significant impacts beyond those previously examined, and none of the conditions described in Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 requiring preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report have occurred; and

9.1 Packet Pg. 191
c. The CAP Update, including the Final CAP document, the CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds and Guidance Report, and the GHG Reduction Measures Quantification and Substantial Evidence (CAP - Appendix D), are consistent with the MMRP for the certified San Ramon 2040 General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2022060549), including Mitigation Measure GHG-1 to adopt and implement an updated, qualified CAP consistent with all requirements of CEQA of 1970, as amended (including CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5) and adopts and implements CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds for San Ramon in accordance with all requirements of CEQA of 1970, as amended; providing an opportunity for future CEQA GHG emissions analysis streamlining for future long-range planning projects and proposed development projects; and

2. Regarding the CAP Update:
a. The recitals above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference; and b. The CAP Update, including the Final CAP document, the CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds and Guidance Report, and the GHG Reduction Measures Quantification and Substantial Evidence (CAP - Appendix D), builds on the progress achieved in the 2011 CAP and is consistent with the General Plan 2040, as a whole, through adoption of an updated, qualified CAP as the primary implementation strategy of the General Plan 2040 for a long-term greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction plan, consistent Senate Bill 32 and other relevant State laws requiring reduction of GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, and with Assembly Bill (AB) 1279, requiring adoption of a goal to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council has considered the Climate Action Plan Task Force feedback and endorsement, the Planning Commission feedback and support, and staff recommendations for the CAP Update, and in the exercise of its independent judgment, and based upon all the evidence in the record (including but not limited to all materials, related CEQA documents, the written and oral staff reports, oral and written comments received by the City, and all other relevant documents contained in the administrative record) does hereby adopt City Council Resolution Number (next in line) to repeal the San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP) in its entirety, adopted on August 23, 2011 with Resolution No. 2011-094, and adopt the Final CAP document (Attachment A) and adopt the CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds and Guidance Report (Attachment B), consistent with all requirements of CEQA of 1970, as amended (including CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall become effective immediately upon passage and adoption.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on this 10th day of June 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

9.1 Packet Pg. 192
NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
__________________________________
Mark Armstrong,
Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Christina Franco,
City Clerk
Attachment A: Final CAP document, dated June 10, 2025
Attachment B:CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds and Guidance Report, dated June 10, 2025

9.1 Packet Pg. 193
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
Final Draft Climate Action Plan
prepared by
City of San Ramon
Community Development Department
Planning Services Division
7000 Bollinger Canyon Road
San Ramon, California 94583
Contact: Ryan Driscoll, Associate Planner
prepared with the assistance of
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
66 Franklin Street, Suite 352 and 357
Oakland, California 94607
AprilJune 10, 2025

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Table of Contents
Final Draft Climate Action Plan i
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................1

1.1 San Ramon CAP Vision and Purpose ...................................................................................1

1.2 Scientific Context and Impacts ............................................................................................3

1.3 Community Engagement and Outreach .............................................................................8 2 Current and Projected GHG Emissions ........................................................................................ 11

2.1 San Ramon GHG Emissions Inventory .............................................................................. 11

2.2 San Ramon GHG Emissions Forecasts .............................................................................. 14

2.3 State Context and San Ramon GHG Emissions Targets ................................................... 19 3 GHG Reduction Measures Framework ........................................................................................ 23

3.1 GHG Reduction Measures Overview ................................................................................ 23

3.2 Climate Action Implementation Pillars ............................................................................ 24

3.3 Measure Cost Savings ...................................................................................................... 25

3.4 Measure Co-Benefits ........................................................................................................ 26

3.5 CAP Measures Implementation Cost Ranges ................................................................... 27

3.6 San Ramon Strategies and Measures Summary .............................................................. 29 4 Cornerstone Strategy ................................................................................................................... 36

4.1 Context ............................................................................................................................. 36

4.2 Cornerstone Measures and Actions Detail ...................................................................... 36 5 Energy Strategy ............................................................................................................................ 38

5.1 Context ............................................................................................................................. 38

5.2 Energy Measures and Actions Detail ............................................................................... 39 6 Transportation Strategy ............................................................................................................... 47

6.1 Context ............................................................................................................................. 47

6.2 Transportation Measures and Actions Detail .................................................................. 48 7 Solid Waste Strategy .................................................................................................................... 60

7.1 Context ............................................................................................................................. 60

7.2 Solid Waste Measures and Actions Detail ....................................................................... 61 8 Water and Wastewater Strategy ................................................................................................. 65

8.1 Context ............................................................................................................................. 65

8.2 Water and Wastewater Measures and Actions Detail..................................................... 65 9 Implementation by City Strategy ................................................................................................. 69

9.1 Context ............................................................................................................................. 69

9.2 Implementation by City Measures and Actions Detail .................................................... 69 10 Nature-based Carbon Sequestration Strategy ............................................................................. 73

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
ii

10.1 Context ............................................................................................................................. 73

10.2 Nature-based Carbon Sequestration Measures and Actions Detail ................................ 74 11 Implementation and Monitoring ................................................................................................. 76

11.1 CAP Implementation and Monitoring .............................................................................. 76

11.2 Ongoing Monitoring, Reporting, and Updating ............................................................. 102 Tables
Table 1 CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5(b) Criteria Addressed in CAP ........................................2 Table 2 Community Engagement and Outreach Timeline ...............................................................8 Table 3 San Ramon Community GHG Emissions Inventory Results by Sector, 2019 ................... 14 Table 4 Demographic Projections and Growth Metrics, 2019 - 2045 .......................................... 15 Table 5 BAU GHG Emissions Forecast Results by Sector (MT CO2e) ............................................ 15 Table 6 Legislative Reduction Considered in Adjusted GHG Emissions Forecast (MT CO2e) ....... 17 Table 7 Adjusted GHG Emissions Forecast Results by Sector (MT CO2e) ..................................... 19 Table 8 San Ramon 2030 and 2045 Per Capita GHG Emissions Reduction Targets ..................... 20 Table 9 Cost Categories ................................................................................................................ 28 Table 10 San Ramon GHG Emissions Reduction Measure Summary ............................................. 30 Table 11 Measure C-1 Actions ........................................................................................................ 37 Table 12 Measure E-1 Actions ........................................................................................................ 39 Table 13 Measure E-2 Actions ........................................................................................................ 40 Table 14 Measure E-3 Actions ........................................................................................................ 42 Table 15 Measure E-4 Actions ........................................................................................................ 43 Table 16 Measure E-5 Actions ........................................................................................................ 45 Table 17 Measure E-6 Actions ........................................................................................................ 46 Table 18 Measure T-1 Actions ........................................................................................................ 49 Table 19 Measure T-2 Actions ........................................................................................................ 50 Table 20 Measure T-3 Actions ........................................................................................................ 51 Table 21 Measure T-4 Actions ........................................................................................................ 53 Table 22 Measure T-5 Actions ........................................................................................................ 54 Table 23 Measure T-6 Actions ........................................................................................................ 55 Table 24 Measure T-7 Actions ........................................................................................................ 56 Table 25 Measure T-8 Actions ........................................................................................................ 58 Table 26 Measure T-9 Actions ........................................................................................................ 59 Table 27 Measure W-1 Actions ....................................................................................................... 61 Table 28 Measure W-2 Actions ....................................................................................................... 62 Table 29 Measure W-3 Actions ....................................................................................................... 64 Table 30 Measure WW-1 Actions ................................................................................................... 66

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Table of Contents
Final Draft Climate Action Plan iii
Table 31 Measure WW-2 Actions ................................................................................................... 67 Table 32 Measure IMP-1 Actions .................................................................................................... 70 Table 33 Measure IMP-2 Actions .................................................................................................... 71 Table 34 Measure CS-1 Actions ...................................................................................................... 74 Table 35 CAP Implementation Timeframe, Responsibility, and Monitoring Metrics ..................... 77 Figures
Figure 1 Hottest Years on Record .....................................................................................................6 Figure 2 Community Feedback Received and Incorporated .......................................................... 10 Figure 3 Carbon Dioxide Equivalents ............................................................................................. 12 Figure 4 San Ramon Community GHG Emissions Inventory Results by Sector, 2019 ................... 13 Figure 5 BAU GHG Emissions Forecast Results by Sector .............................................................. 16 Figure 6 Adjusted GHG Emissions Forecast Results by Sector ....................................................... 18 Figure 7 San Ramon 2030 and 2045 Per Capita GHG Emissions Reduction Targets ..................... 21 Figure 8 San Ramon 2030 and 2045 Mass GHG Emissions Reduction Targets .............................. 22 Figure 9 San Ramon’s Climate Action Measure Structure ............................................................. 23 Figure 10 San Ramon Climate Action Implementation Pillars ......................................................... 25 Appendices
Appendix A Climate Legislation and Executive Orders
Appendix B 2019 Community GHG Emissions Inventory
Appendix C GHG Emissions Previous Inventories Updates, Forecasts, and Reduction Targets Appendix D CAP GHG Reduction Measures Quantification and Substantial Evidence Appendix E 2022 Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
iv
This page intentionally left blank.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Glossary of Terms and Acronyms
Final Draft Climate Action Plan v
Glossary of Terms and Acronyms
Active Transportation Refers to any form of human-powered transportation, such as walking or bicycling, that promotes physical activity and reduces reliance on motor vehicles.

Affordable Housing and Sustainable
Communities Program (AHSC)
The AHSC Program funds Projects that implement land-use, housing, transportation, and agricultural land preservation practices that reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Funding for the AHSC Program is provided by the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF), an account established to receive Cap-and-Trade auction proceeds.

Alameda County Industries (ACI) Alameda County Industries provides residential, commercial and industrial collection services for recyclables, organics, and garbage.

Assembly Bill (AB) Legislation introduced in the California State Assembly. Each bill is assigned an “AB” number (e.g., AB 32), indicating it originated from the Assembly.

Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) A measure of how many people, on average, commute in a single vehicle. It is used to gauge the effectiveness of programs aimed at reducing solo driving.

Bay Area Air Quality Management
District (Air DistrictBAAQMD)
The Bay Area Air Quality Management District, or BAAQMDthe Air District, is a public agency that regulates the stationary sources of air pollution in the nine counties of California's San Francisco Bay Area:

Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, southwestern Solano, and southern Sonoma. The Air District BAAQMD is governed by a 24-member Board of Directors composed of elected officials from each of the nine Bay Area counties.

Bay Area Regional Energy Network
(BayREN)
A network of local governments and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) partnering to promote energy, water and greenhouse gas reduction for residents, small businesses, and local governments.

Bay Area Multifamily Building
Enhancements (BAMBE)
A ratepayer funded energy efficiency and electrification retrofit program offering rebates, technical assistance, and support to multifamily property owners for energy and water efficiency upgrades that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and utility costs.

Business-as-Usual (BAU) A scenario in which no additional efforts or policies are implemented beyond what is already in place, providing a baseline for measuring future climate or emissions reductions strategies.

California Alternate Rates for
Energy (CARE)
A program by California’s investor-owned utilities that provides income-qualified households with discounts on monthly electric and natural gas bills.

California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA)
A California law requiring public agencies to evaluate and disclose the environmental impacts of proposed projects and to minimize or mitigate those impacts when feasible.

California Air Resources Board
(CARB)
The state agency responsible for protecting public health from the effects of air pollution and for regulating sources of greenhouse gases and other air pollutants in California.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
vi
California Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC)
The regulatory authority that oversees privately owned utilities in California, including electric, natural gas, telephone, water, and transportation companies.

California Green Building Standards
Code (CALGreen)
The first statewide green building code in the nation, mandating specific sustainable construction standards for residential and nonresidential buildings in California.

Carbon Dioxide (CO2) A naturally occurring gas is also produced by human activities such as the combustion of fossil fuels. It is the primary greenhouse gas contributing to climate change.

Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (MT
CO2e)
A standard unit of measure for describing the global warming potential of different greenhouse gases in terms of the amount of CO2 that would have the same impact.

Carbon Neutral/Neutrality Carbon neutral and/or carbon neutrality is the state or goal of achieving net-zero carbon emissions by balancing the amount of carbon released with an equivalent amount of carbon removal or offset. It involves reducing emissions wherever possible and compensating for any remaining emissions through activities such as reforestation, renewable energy projects, or carbon capture.

Carbon Sequestration Carbon sequestration is the process of capturing and storing atmospheric carbon dioxide in natural or engineered systems. It helps mitigate climate change by preventing or slowing the release of CO₂ into the atmosphere through methods such as reforestation, soil management, and carbon capture technologies.

Climate Action Plan (CAP) A strategic document outlining specific policies, programs, and actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance resilience to climate change at a local or regional level.

Contra Costa Transportation
Authority (CCTA)
The transportation planning and funding agency for Contra Costa County, California, responsible for creating and administering a comprehensive transportation system.

Cost Savings Cost savings are the net reduction in expenses realized when the incremental costs associated with these new technologies are partially or fully offset by incentives, rebates, or other financial supports.

Clean Off-Road Equipment Voucher
Incentive Program (CORE)
The Clean Off-Road Equipment Voucher Incentive Project (CORE) is a multi-million-dollar incentive project intended to encourage California off-road equipment users to purchase or lease currently commercialized zero-emission off-road equipment.

Decarbonize/Decarbonization The process of reducing or eliminating carbon dioxide (and other greenhouse gases) from energy sources, industries, and operations, typically by transitioning to low- or zero-carbon technologies.

Dublin San Ramon Services District
(DSRSD)
A special district that provides water, recycled water, and wastewater treatment services in parts of Dublin, San Ramon, and Pleasanton, California.

East Bay Municipal Utility District
(EBMUD)
A public utility agency serving water and wastewater needs in portions of Alameda and Contra Costa counties in the San Francisco Bay Area.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Glossary of Terms and Acronyms
Final Draft Climate Action Plan vii
Electric Vehicle (EV) A vehicle powered by one or more electric motors, typically drawing electricity from batteries that can be recharged from the power grid or other energy sources.

Environmental Impact Report (EIR) A detailed analysis required by CEQA that evaluates the potential environmental effects of a proposed project, proposing ways to reduce or mitigate those impacts.

Executive Order (EO) A directive from the Governor of California or the President of the United States that manages operations of the government and may direct agencies to implement specific policies.

Family Electric Rate Assistance
(FERA)
A California utility discount program for households of three or more people who meet certain income guidelines, offering a reduced electricity rate.

Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) A major climate change assessment published by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2007, which informed global policy discussions on climate action.

Global Warming Potential (GWP) A measure of how much heat a greenhouse gas traps in the atmosphere over a specific time period, compared to the same amount of carbon dioxide.

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Any gas that traps heat in the atmosphere, contributing to the greenhouse effect. Common GHGs include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and fluorinated gases.

High Efficiency Electric Home
Rebate (HEEHRA)
HEEHRA is the High-Efficiency Electric Home Rebate Act passed as part of the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act by the U.S. Congress. The 10-year rebate program a voluntary incentive program and will cover 100% (up to $14,000) of the cost for low- and moderate-income homeowners to replace their old electric resistance and gas appliances with new energy efficient ones.

Homeowner Managing Energy
Savings (HOMES) Rebate
Section 50121 of the Inflation Reduction Act offers the Home Efficiency Rebate Program, also referred to as HOMES, rebates for energy-efficiency upgrades that improve the overall energy performance of a single-family home or multifamily building through September 2031.

Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC)
A United Nations body that evaluates science related to climate change, providing policymakers with regular scientific assessments and guidance.

Incremental Costs Incremental (or marginal costs) refer to the difference between the total upfront expense of a conventional system and that of the higherefficiency or zero-emission system.

Internal Costs Internal costs are those experienced by the City (i.e., City staff time and capital costs) while external costs are those felt by the community (i.e., residents and businesses).

Kilowatt-hour (kWh) The kilowatt-hour is a composite unit of energy equal to one kilowatt (kW) sustained for (multiplied by) one hour. Kilowatt-hours are a common billing unit for electrical energy supplied by electric utilities.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
viii
Lifecycle Costs Lifecycle costs refer to the ongoing expenses or cost savings generated from the operating, maintaining, and disposing of that item, and can also include City staff time spent on enforcement, monitoring, and compliance over the item’s lifespan.

Low-Income Weatherization
Program (LIWP)
A California program, funded by the California Department of Community Services and Development, that helps low-income households improve energy efficiency and access solar power, reducing energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions.

Marin Clean Energy (MCE) A public, not-for-profit electricity provider (Community Choice Aggregation) in several Bay Area counties, offering higher proportions of renewable energy compared to traditional utilities.

Megawatt (MW) A unit of power equal to one million watts, used to quantify the output of power plants or the electricity demand of large facilities.

Methane (CH4) A potent greenhouse gas emitted by natural sources (e.g., wetlands) and human activities such as livestock farming, landfills, and fossil fuel production.

Metric Tons (MT) The metric ton (MT) is a unit of weight in the metric system and is equal to 1,000 kilograms or approximately 2,204.62 pounds. It provides a standardized unit for measuring large quantities of goods, such as minerals, agricultural products, and industrial materials.

Micro-transit A flexible form of shared transportation, often using smaller vehicles and app-based scheduling, operating on-demand or along dynamic routes within a defined service area.

Mobility hub A mobility hub is a central or well-connected location where multiple forms of transportation—such as buses, trains, bike sharing, scooters, car sharing, and ridesharing—are brought together with supportive infrastructure and amenities (e.g., secure bike parking, charging stations, real-time travel information) to make travel more seamless, convenient, and efficient.

Nitrous Oxide (N2O) A powerful greenhouse gas released through agricultural and industrial activities, as well as combustion of fossil fuels and solid waste.

Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) One of California’s major investor-owned utilities, providing electricity and natural gas services to customers in the northern and central parts of the state.

Reach Code A local or regional building code that goes beyond minimum statewide or national energy efficiency requirements. Reach codes set higher standards to drive increased energy efficiency, reduce carbon emissions, and promote sustainable building practices.

Renewable Portfolio Standard A regulatory policy that requires electricity providers to supply a certain percentage of their power from renewable energy sources, often with targets increasing over time to foster clean energy development.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Glossary of Terms and Acronyms
Final Draft Climate Action Plan ix
Single-family Affordable Solar
Homes (SASH) Program
A state-run initiative offering incentives that help low-income homeowners in single-family residences install solar panels at reduced or no cost. GRID Alternatives (GRID), a non-profit solar contractor, is the statewide Program Administrator for the SASH Program.

Senate Bill (SB) Legislation introduced in the California State Senate. Each bill receives an “SB” number (e.g., SB 1000), indicating it originated in the Senate.

Single Margin Source Energy Score
Ordinance
A local amendment to the building code that establishes a single metric to evaluate a building’s energy efficiency or GHG emissions.

The single metric is established for buildings of all energy types to set a consistent standard for new construction.

Self-Generation Incentive Program
(SGIP)
A California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) program providing financial incentives for the installation of on-site energy storage and other self-generation technologies.

Southwest Area Transportation
Planning Committee (SWAT)
SWAT is responsible for the development of transportation plans, programs, and policies throughout the South County sub-region of Contra Costa County.

Small Off-Road Engine (SORE) Refers to small, typically gas-powered engines under 25 horsepower, such as those used in lawn mowers, leaf blowers, and other landscaping or maintenance equipment.

Transportation Demand
Management (TDM)
Strategies and policies designed to reduce congestion and vehicle miles traveled (VMT), often through carpooling, public transit incentives, telecommuting, and other measures that shift travel behavior.

United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change
Paris Agreement (UNFCCC)
The UNFCCC entered into force on 21 March 1994. The ultimate objective of the Convention is to stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations "at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic (human induced) interference with the climate system."
Upfront Costs Upfront costs include the costs associated with purchasing and installing an item, including any City staff time spent on related activities like procurement, planning, or ordinance development.

Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) A measure of the total miles driven by all vehicles within a specified region and timeframe, often used to gauge traffic levels and evaluate transportation policies.

Vulnerable Community/Vulnerable
Population
People with disabilities, access, and/or function needs and individuals exhibiting social vulnerability factors including language barriers, social isolation, and infirmities of aging.

Zero-Emission Vehicles (ZEV) Vehicles that produce no direct (tailpipe) emissions of pollutants or greenhouse gases, such as battery electric cars or hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan x
This page intentionally left blank.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Introduction
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 1
1 Introduction

1.1 San Ramon CAP Vision and Purpose
Vision
The San Ramon Draft Climate Action Plan (CAP)
envisions a more sustainable and healthy San
Ramon community while maintaining a strong
economy and reducing greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions in compliance with State climate
laws and State GHG emissions goals. With a
focus on pragmatic, measurable, and timebound strategies, this CAP provides a framework and strategies that work towards
this vision and can be tracked and adjusted to
best serve the community.

This CAP focuses on fostering collaborative
partnerships with community-based
organizations and regional agencies and utilities to extend the plan’s reach through a strong and supportive network working together towards achieving a more sustainable and healthy community.

This CAP supports this vision and builds on the progress achieved in the San Ramon 2011 CAP by providing an updated and finetuned communitywide plan for reducing GHG emissions and supporting State climate action goals. By achieving meaningful GHG emissions reduction and a more sustainable community vision, San Ramon would contribute a fair share to address the climate crisis and support both State and international climate goals and limit global temperature rise and the most detrimental impacts of climate change.

Opportunities to Reduce GHG Emissions
Cities play a crucial role in reducing GHG emissions in California. The policies and initiatives implemented by local governments have the capability to influence community activities that can affect high-emissions behaviors, mitigate the consequences of climate change, and equip the community to better withstand its effects. Cities hold the potential to drive climate action, specifically GHG emissions reduction, through adopting climate action plans and ordinances, developing partnerships between public and private entities, and accessing grant funding that supports impactful shifts in behavior. They can enact various measures to decrease emissions, including enhancing building regulations to curtail energy consumption, offering incentives for alternative transportation methods to reduce fuel usage, broadening options for diverting waste and utilizing renewable energy sources, as well as educating residents about their roles as both citizens and consumers.

Purpose
This CAP establishes new measures and actions to comply with relevant State laws and reduce San Ramon per capita communitywide GHG emissions in line with the State climate goals of reducing GHG emission levels to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 pursuant to California Senate Bill (SB) 32.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
2 Such measures and actions also guide San Ramon towards substantially reducing communitywide GHG emissions to net zero by 2045, consistent with the California target of achieving carbon neutrality by 2045 pursuant to California Assembly Bill (AB) 1279. See Appendix A for a written description and a timeline of relevant California climate action planning regulations. Specifically, to achieve the 2030 State goal and make progress towards achieving the 2045 State goal, implementation of this CAP would reduce San Ramon annual per capita GHG emissions by 53 percent below 1990 levels by 2030.

This reduction is equivalent to reducing San Ramon’s annual GHG emissions by at least 96,462 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MT CO2e) to 332,995 MT CO2e by 2030.

By aligning with and demonstrating compliance with State GHG emissions reduction laws and goals, the CAP also provides the opportunity for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) GHG emissions analysis streamlining, meets the mitigation requirements of the San Ramon 2040 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), and guides the community towards achieving State and local climate goals.

CEQA GHG Emissions Analysis Streamlining
This CAP fulfills the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5(b) to be considered a “qualified” GHG reduction plan.1 In compliance with the CEQA Guidelines, local agencies must evaluate the environmental impacts of new development projects or plans, including impacts related to GHG emissions associated with the construction and operation of projects or plans. This process can be cumbersome for local agencies and developers alike and can result in project delays. The CEQA Guidelines provide an option for new projects to streamline the CEQA analysis of GHG emissions by tiering from a qualified GHG reduction plan.

This CAP and its associated CEQA environmental assessment documentation are consistent with the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5(b) as summarized in Table 1Table 1. As such, this CAP is considered a qualified GHG emissions reduction plan.

Table 1 CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5(b) Criteria Addressed in CAP CEQA Criteria
CAP Chapter
Addressing Criteria

1. Quantify existing and projected GHG emissions within the plan area Chapter 2 Appendix B
Appendix C

2. Establish a reduction target consistent with State goals Chapter 2 Appendix C

3. Identify and analyze sector specific GHG emissions from specific actions or categories of actions anticipated within the geographic area Chapter 2
Appendix B
Appendix E

4. Specify measures and actions that substantial evidence demonstrates would collectively achieve the specified reduction target Chapters 4 through 10
Appendix D

5. Establish a mechanism to monitor progress and amend the plan if it is not achieving specified emissions levels
Chapter 11

6. Adopt in a public process following environmental review Found consistent with General Plan 2040 EIR Mitigation Measure GHG-1 as part of
environmental review and adopted* by
City Council
* Anticipated adoption
1 Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), “General Plan Guidelines - Chapter 8: Climate Change,” Available:
https://opr.ca.gov/docs/OPR_C8_final.pdf.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Introduction
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 3
If future projects are consistent with this CAP, future CEQA GHG emissions impact analyses can be streamlined according to the City’s direction. As such, this CAP is being prepared, in part, to provide a future qualitative CEQA GHG emissions analysis pathway.

San Ramon General Plan 2040 Environmental Impact Report Requirement In December 2023, the City adopted the San Ramon 2040 General Plan and certified the associated Final EIR. The Final EIR includes Mitigation Measure GHG-1, which requires the City to adopt and implement a San Ramon qualified CAP and San Ramon CEQA GHG Emissions Thresholds. As such, this CAP is being prepared, in part, to meet the requirements of the San Ramon General Plan 2040 EIR.

Community Investment
The CAP is designed to guide the community towards longer-term investments to address GHG emissions reduction strategies while being sensitive to implementation costs for both the City and community. For example, the CAP includes measures and actions related to charging and fueling infrastructure for zero-emission vehicles (ZEV). These measures and actions require infrastructure investment; however, adding conduit and panel capacity for EV chargers during new construction results in far less upfront costs when compared to retrofitting EV infrastructure later after construction.2
With the anticipated growth of EV adoption, delaying this investment could place a heavier financial burden on San Ramon residents in the future.

Additionally, the CAP includes GHG reduction strategies, such as tree planting and installing microgrids which have resilience co-benefits. These strategies require initial investments today will help prepare San Ramon in the event of more extreme heat events, wildfires, and rising energy demands in the future. Delaying such investments could require San Ramon to initiate more expensive emergency responses or infrastructure upgrades down the road. The World Resources Institute estimates a benefit-cost ratio between 2:1 and 10:1 for such investments, meaning that for every dollar spent on resilience, $2 to $10 in benefits could be seen.3 As such, this CAP is being prepared, in part, to guide the community towards proactive, longer-term investments that could provide future cost savings.

1.2 Scientific Context and Impacts
The CAP is centered around reducing GHG emissions due to the global impact of GHG emissions on climate change and the local impact of climate change in San Ramon. The following subsections describe the scientific context of GHG emissions and the impacts of climate change.

Climate Change Science
The Greenhouse Gas Effect and Climate Change
Earth’s climate is largely driven by energy that comes from the sun. When solar radiation reaches the Earth’s atmosphere, some of it is reflected into space and a portion is absorbed by the Earth’s surface.

As the Earth absorbs solar radiation, its surface heats up and re-radiates heat back out into the 2 California Air Resources Board (CARB) (2019). EV Charging Infrastructure. Accessed January 2025 at:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2020-
08/CARB_Technical_Analysis_EV_Charging_Nonresidential_CALGreen_2019_2020_Intervening_Code.pdf. 3 World Resources Institute (2019). Global Leaders Call for Urgent Action on Climate Adaptation; Commission Finds Adaptation Can Deliver $7.1 Trillion in Benefits. Accessed October 2024 at: https://www.wri.org/news/release-global-leaders-call-urgent-action-climateadaptation-commission-finds-adaptation-can.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
4 atmosphere.4 While some of the heat escapes past the atmosphere into space, gases in the atmosphere prevent the loss of some of the heat. The gases trapping the heat are known as GHG’s.5 Without some GHGs in the atmosphere, the Earth would not be warm enough to sustain life as we know it. This heat trapping quality of gases in Earth’s atmosphere is known as the greenhouse effect.

Increased levels of specific GHGs in the atmosphere means that less heat escapes to space. More heat trapped in the atmosphere leads to much hotter than average temperatures also known as global warming, which in turn contributes to more intense storms, drought, extreme heat events, and sea level rise.6 These effects are considered climate change.

Human-caused climate change is well understood and widely accepted by the scientific community, with over 97 percent of climate scientists agreeing that the planet is warming and human activities are the root cause.7 Human activities have raised the levels of GHGs in the atmosphere from 280 parts per million to over 410 parts per million in the last 150 years.8 Although many changes to climate are governed by natural processes, human activities have added GHGs to the atmosphere at a rate that is unprecedented in Earth’s history, leading to CO2 levels that are now higher than they have been any time in the past 800,000 years.9

Globally, climate change is already impacting both human and natural systems. Scientists have measured shrinking ice sheets, warming, and acidifying oceans, increasing global temperatures, less snow cover, sea level rise, and species extinction. The potential consequences of these climate change related impacts include the flooding of low-lying areas, reduction of fresh-water supply, adverse changes to biological resources and public health, as well as many other adverse environmental consequences.10
4 NASA. “The Causes of Climate Change,” Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. Available: https://climate.nasa.gov/causes. 5 UCAR. “The Greenhouse Effect | Center for Science Education,” Available: https://scied.ucar.edu/learning-zone/how-climateworks/greenhouse-effect. 6 IPCC. “Summary for Policymakers — Global Warming of 1.5 o C. Available: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm/. 7 NASA. “Scientific Consensus: Earth’s Climate Is Warming,” Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. Available:
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus. 8 J. Blunden and T. Boyer, “State of the Climate in 2020,” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 102, no. 8. 2021. Available:
https://doi.org/10.1175/2021BAMSStateoftheClimate.1.
9 Ibid.
10 IPCC. “Impacts of 1.5°C of Global Warming on Natural and Human Systems,” Assessment Report 5. 2018. Available:
https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/chapter-3/

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Introduction
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 5
Source: National Resources Defense Council, https://www.nrdc.org/stories/greenhouse-effect-101

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
6 Globally, a warming trend is abundantly clear, with nineteen of the hottest years on record occurring since 2000.11 As shown in Figure 1Figure 1, the year 2020 tied with 2016 for the hottest year on record since record-keeping began in 1880, and these trends are consistent across numerous monitoring agencies and data sets.12 NASA recorded July 2023 as the hottest month on record since 1880. 13 Figure 1 Hottest Years on Record
Source: Climate Central, https://www.climatecentral.org/graphic/summer-heat-pushes-2023-temperatures-nearrecord?graphicSet=2023+Global+Temperatures+Near+Hottest+on+Record Though climate change is a global phenomenon it has the potential to impact facets of society on the local level including health outcomes, natural resource access, infrastructure, emergency response, tourism, and frequency of disasters. The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projections show that a reduction in GHG emission to carbon neutrality by mid-century is required to limit warming trends to 1.5 degrees Celsius and avoid the worst impacts of climate change.14 In order to achieve this target, action must be taken at all levels of society to reduce emissions of GHGs.
11 NASA-GISS. “Land-Ocean Temperature Index (C): Global Mean Estimates Based on Land and Ocean Data.” Available:
https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/graph_data/Global_Mean_Estimates_based_on_Land_and_Ocean_Data/graph.txt. 12 NASA. “Global Surface Temperature | NASA Global Climate Change,” Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. Available:
https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature.

Climatic Research Unit (CRU). “Land Surface Air Temperature Variations Across the Globe Updated to 2019: The CRUTEM5 Data Set,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 126, no. 2. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032352 Accessed: 13 https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-clocks-july-2023-as-hottest-month-on-record-ever-since-1880/ 14 IPCC. “Summary for Policymakers — Global Warming of 1.5 o C.” Available: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm/.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Introduction
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 7
Types of GHG Emissions
The IPCC lists the following GHGs: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O), as well as chlorofluorocarbons, hydrochlorofluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride, which are collectively called fluorinated gases.15 Almost all the GHGs emitted in the United States each year consist of CO2, CH4, and N2O, while fluorinated gases make up the remaining emissions16. Because CO2, CH4, and N2O comprise a large majority of GHG emissions at the community level, these are the gases considered in this analysis.

Each GHG has a different propensity for trapping heat in the atmosphere, known as its global warming potential (GWP). GHGs also last for different periods of time in the atmosphere, ranging from a decade to several thousand years. Because all the GHGs have different characteristics, a standard unit is needed to compare the potential impact of different GHGs and allow them to be added up in an analysis. This is achieved by converting all GHGs into the standard unit known as a carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), based on the amount of heat one metric ton (MT) of CO2 traps in the atmosphere.

GWP for each GHG was drawn from the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report,17 which is consistent with the methodology the California Air Resources Board (CARB) uses to conduct the State’s GHG inventories. Since CO2 is used as the reference point for trapping heat, CO2 has a GWP of 1. Methane has a GWP of 25, meaning that each metric ton (MT) of methane causes 25 times more warming than 1 MT of CO2. Nitrous oxide has a GWP of 298, meaning 298 times the GWP of 1 MT of CO2. 18 Sources of GHG Emissions
The combustion of fossil fuels is the primary source of GHG emissions. Decomposition of waste, and land use change are also major contributors. It can be helpful to understand how different sectors contribute to total emissions. The top sources of GHGs statewide are transportation (39 percent), industrial processes (23 percent), and electric power (16 percent).19 The magnitude of total California GHG emissions is due in part to its large size and large population compared to other states. However, a factor that reduces California per capita fuel use and GHG emissions as compared to other states is its relatively mild climate.20
The main sources of GHG emissions in San Ramon are from transportation, buildings, and waste.

Transportation emissions are generated by fuels used to power cars, trucks, public transit, and offroad vehicles. Building emissions are associated with electricity and natural gas used by commercial, residential, and municipal buildings. Waste from residential, commercial, and municipal sources 15 Note: Fluorinated gases, which includes four main types: hydrofluorocarbons 8. (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), are man-made gases that can stay in the atmosphere for centuries and contribute to the GHG effect. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. “Main Greenhouse Gases.” 2021. Available: https://www.c2es.org/content/main-greenhouse-gases/.

Accessed December 2021
16 Note: Ninety-seven percent of the annual GHG emissions consist of CO2, CH4, and N2O and fluorinated gases make up the remaining three percent of GHG emissions. US EPA. “Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks.” 2021. Available:
https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks. Accessed: December 2021; World Resources Institute. “4 Charts Explain Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Countries and Sectors”. 2021. Available: https://www.wri.org/insights/4-chartsexplain-greenhouse-gas-emissions-countries-and-sectors. 17 IPCC. Climate Change 20007: Synthesis Report. Available: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ar4_syr_full_report.pdf.

Accessed December 2024; and California Air Resources Board (CARB). “GHG Global Warming Potentials.” Available:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ghg-gwps. Accessed December 2024. 18 IPCC. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Available: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ar4_syr_full_report.pdf. 19 California Air Resources Board (CARB). Current California GHG Emission Inventory Data: 2000-2022 GHG Inventory (2024 Edition).” Available: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ghg-inventory-data. Accessed December 2024. 20 U.S. EPA. 2023. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990-2021. Available at:
https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-04/US-GHG-Inventory-2023-Main-Text.pdf

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
8 generates methane emissions as material (especially organics like food scraps and yard waste) decomposes in the landfill.

Climate Change Impacts
Climate change already has impacted and will continue to impact the San Ramon community, including its residents, businesses, and visitors. In the past few years, San Ramon has experienced severe droughts, poor air quality from regional wildfire smoke, local flooding from extreme precipitation events, and extreme heat events. As the climate continues to change, many climate hazards may become more frequent and intense. In 2016, the California legislature adopted SB 1000 requiring local jurisdictions to review and update Safety Elements of the General Plan to address and update hazards related to flooding, fires and to include climate adaptation and resilience strategies.

The San Ramon General Plan 2040 Update includes a Safety Element that addresses these state requirements. However, beyond simply responding to climate impacts as they occur, it is critical that communities focus on reducing the GHG emissions that lead to climate change.

1.3 Community Engagement and Outreach
This CAP was developed as part of an iterative process with input from the community, specially formulated CAP Task Force, City staff, and City decision-makers. Table 2Table 2 summarizes the timeline of events and outreach used to solicit input and feedback on the CAP while the subsections below summarize the types of engagement and outreach performed and how the input was incorporated into the CAP.

Table 2 Community Engagement and Outreach Timeline
Timeline Community Engagement and Outreach Event
September 2021 CAP Public Workshop #1
October 2022 to August 2023 City staff input on measures and actions June 2024 CAP Task Force Meeting #1
July 2024 CAP Task Force Meeting #2
September 2024 CAP Task Force Meeting #3
October 2024 Planning Commission Meeting #1 / CAP Public Workshop #2 October 2024 CAP Task Force Meeting #4
November 2024 Planning Commission Meeting #2 / CAP Public Workshop #3 April to May 2025 CAP Update Public Review / CAP Public Workshop #4 / CAP Task Force Meeting #5 June 2025 City Council Meeting *
Note:
* Anticipated adoption.

CAP Community Public Meetings and Workshops
While all CAP meetings (i.e., CAP Task Force Meetings and Planning Commission Meetings) were open to the public, the City hosted four public meetings specifically focused on receiving feedback from the San Ramon community. These meetings functioned as workshops where the City presented the latest CAP information to the community to solicit feedback on the CAP during the development process.

The workshops introduced the CAP purpose and development process to the community, solicited

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Introduction
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 9
feedback on the CAP measures and actions, and solicited feedback on the draft CAP document.

Figure 2Figure 2 summarizes the key themes that the City heard during these CAP public workshops and how the CAP addressed them.

CAP Task Force Meetings
The City hosted five meetings with the CAP Task Force that was established by the City Council to provide feedback to the Planning Commission and City Council regarding the CAP. Composed of seven community members plus two alternates with backgrounds in sustainability leadership and climate advocacy, the Task Force workshopped the CAP’s measures and actions. Overall, the City incorporated over 85 percent of the Task Force’s comments into the CAP’s measures and actions details. After these revisions were made, the Task Force made the final recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council to adopt the CAP. Figure 2Figure 2 summarizes the key themes that the City heard during these CAP Task Force meetings and how the CAP incorporated the feedback.

City Staff and Decision-Makers
Throughout the development of the CAP, the City also engaged City staff across four departments (i.e., Community Development, City Attorney, Parks and Community Services, Public Works) and City decision-makers including the Planning Commission and City Council. The input from City staff resulted in a refined list of measures and actions. The City presented information to the Planning Commission and the City Council during the CAP development process to answer questions, address concerns in real-time, and revise the CAP’s measures and actions. The City met with the Planning Commission on the CAP two times and will meet with the City Council regarding the CAP at the anticipated point of adoption.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
10 Figure 2 Community Feedback Received and Incorporated

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Current and Projected GHG Emissions
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 11
2 Current and Projected GHG Emissions

2.1 San Ramon GHG Emissions Inventory
A fundamental part of the climate action planning process is the development of a GHG emissions inventory for a specific point in time (i.e., a calendar year). A GHG emissions inventory quantifies emissions from various sectors or categories (e.g., energy, transportation, etc.) to help guide the development of a CAP by identifying the sources under the City’s jurisdictional control that generate the greatest amount of GHG emissions and providing a consistent baseline for tracking emissions reductions over time. The 2019 GHG inventory serves as both a progress update compared to the 2011 CAP and a baseline for forecasting and planning future GHG emissions reductions for this CAP.

The City selected 2019 as the calendar year for San Ramon’s baseline community GHG emissions inventory because this was the year with most complete data available at the time of completion.21 GHG Inventory Geographical Context
The 2019 community GHG emissions inventory includes the emissions sources directly and indirectly influenced by activities occurring within the City of San Ramon’s city limits boundary. The city limits boundary encompasses the geographical scope for which the City of San Ramon can make land use decisions and set policies to effectively reduce GHG emissions within the San Ramon community.

GHG Inventory Protocols
This community GHG emissions inventory was developed based on the Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI) United States Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Community Protocol)22. The protocol identifies specific principles that serve to guide the measurement and reporting of GHG emissions related to relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy.

San Ramon’s GHG emissions inventory focuses on the three GHGs most relevant to local government policymaking: CO2, CH4, and N2O. These gases comprise a large majority of community GHG emissions.

The other gases such as hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluorides are emitted primarily in private sector manufacturing and electricity transmission and are the subject of regulation at the state level and therefore, have been omitted from San Ramon’s inventory. To allow for comparison among GHG emissions sources, all emissions are converted to the equivalent of one metric ton of carbon dioxide, or MT CO2e. One MT CO2e is the equivalent of using approximately 113 gallons of gasoline or driving 2,568 miles in a standard combustion vehicle, as shown in Figure 3.23 21 Selecting a pre-COVID-19 pandemic baseline year also avoids potential distortions in GHG emissions trends due to the temporary reductions in activity caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies have shown that global daily GHG emissions in April 2020 were approximately 17 percent lower than in the same month of 2019, with the most significant reductions occurring in the transportation, manufacturing, and power generation sectors (Le Quéré et al., 2020).

Le Quéré et al. 2020. COVID-19 impact on an academic Institution's greenhouse gas inventory: The case of Cornell University. Accessed May 2025 at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652622020418#bib13. 22 ICLEI. July 2019. U.S. Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emission. Accessed December 2024 at:
https://icleiusa.org/us-community-protocol/. 23 EPA. Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator. Available at: Accessed in December 2024 at: https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhousegas-equivalencies-calculator.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
12 Figure 3 Carbon Dioxide Equivalents
Emissions Sectors
The results of San Ramon’s 2019 community GHG emissions inventory demonstrate the relative scale of GHG emissions generated by sources within San Ramon. These GHG emission sources have been categorized into emission sectors that align with those used in the San Ramon 2008, 2010, and 2014 GHG inventories,24 including:
 Natural Gas (residential, commercial, and transmission and distribution losses),  Electricity (residential, commercial, transmission and distribution losses, water transport, wastewater conveyance and treatment)
 On-road Motor Vehicles,
 Off-road Equipment,
 Waste, and
 Wastewater Treatment Processes.

Excluded Emissions Activities
Not all GHG-generating activities are included in the inventory. Certain activities captured in the state inventory and by other communities, such as agriculture, simply do not occur within San Ramon’s boundaries, while other activities, like pass-through vehicle emissions (vehicles traveling through the 24 The 2011 Climate Action Plan GHG emissions accounting included High-Global Warming Potential Ozone Depleting Substance Substitutes, which are not included in the 2019 community GHG emissions inventory. The 2019 community GHG emissions inventory also includes the addition of natural gas transmission and distribution losses and wastewater treatment processes emissions sources, which were not accounted for in the 2011 Climate Action Plan. See Attachment B for details on the inclusions/exclusion of these emissions sources based on current best practices.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Current and Projected GHG Emissions
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 13
city without stopping), fall outside the City’s control. These exclusions reflect the protocol's focus on activities that local policies can reasonably affect.25 2019 GHG Inventory (CAP Baseline)
In 2019, San Ramon’s community-wide GHG emissions totaled approximately 437,784 MT CO₂e. As shown in Figure 4Figure 4 and Table 3Table 3, the on-road motor vehicles sector was the largest contributor to San Ramon’s GHG emissions in 2019, accounting for 52 percent of total emissions due to the combustion of gasoline and diesel by passenger and commercial vehicles. The second-largest source was building energy use from electricity and natural gas consumption, representing a combined 37 percent of the total. Within this sector, natural gas contributed the majority of GHG emissions, highlighting an opportunity for energy efficiency upgrades and electrification. San Ramon’s participation in Marin Clean Energy (MCE) significantly reduces the carbon intensity of electricity use, underscoring the benefits of renewable energy adoption. Solid waste and wastewater contributed relatively small shares to the total emissions, at four percent and one percent, respectively, reflecting the success of methane capture systems at regional landfills and efficient wastewater treatment processes. These findings emphasize the importance of addressing transportation and natural gas use as priority areas for future emissions reductions. See Appendix B for additional information on the inventory.

Figure 4 San Ramon Community GHG Emissions Inventory Results by Sector, 2019 25 The Regional Targets Advisory Committee (RTAC) established under SB 375 recommends the following accounting of various trip types for VMT purposes23: Include 100% of internal-internal (I-I) trips Exclude external-external (X-X) trips Count 50% of internal-external (I-X) and external-internal (X-I) trips. Recommendations of the Regional Targets Advisory Committee (RTAC) Pursuant to Senate Bill 375.

September 2009. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/rtac/report/092909/finalreport.pdf 226,484
117,360
42,031
33,415
14,931
3,562
0 50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
On-road Motor
Vehicles
Natural Gas Electricity Off-road
Equipment
Waste Wastewater
GHG Emissions (MT CO2e)

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
14 Table 3 San Ramon Community GHG Emissions Inventory Results by Sector, 2019 GHG Emissions Sector
GHG Emissions
(MT CO2e)
Percent of
GHG Emissions Totals
On-road Motor Vehicles 226,484 52%
Natural Gas (residential, commercial, and transmission and distribution losses)
117,360 27%
Electricity (residential, commercial, transmission and distribution losses, water transport, wastewater conveyance and treatment)
42,031 10%
Off-road Equipment 33,415 8%
Waste 14,931 3%
Wastewater Treatment Processes 3,562 1%
Total 437,784 100%
MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
Totals may not add due to rounding.

2.2 San Ramon GHG Emissions Forecasts
A GHG emissions inventory establishes a reference point for a single year; however, annual GHG emissions change over time due to factors such as changes in population and jobs as well as new technologies and legislation. The San Ramon GHG emissions forecast estimates future GHG emission changes by accounting for community growth projected in the San Ramon General Plan Update and the 6th Cycle Housing Element Update; then, accounting for GHG emissions reduction expected in San Ramon from currently adopted state energy and climate legislation. This section includes an estimate of the future emissions for San Ramon in the years 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040, and 2045 in a business-as-usual scenario (BAU) forecast and a legislative-adjusted scenario (adjusted) forecast, which are defined as follows:
 Business-as-Usual (BAU) Forecast: forecast of how future GHG emissions would change if current activities continued as they did in 2019 and growth trends were to occur absent of any policies or legislation that would reduce local emissions. The BAU forecast is based on growth trends projected in population, housing, employment, and transportation activity over time, consistent with regional projections.
 Adjusted Forecast: forecast of how currently adopted legislation would reduce GHG emissions from the BAU forecast. The adjusted forecast represents the State’s contribution to reducing local GHG emissions to meet state goals without any additional contribution from local policies or actions.

The adjusted forecast incorporates the impact of state regulations that provide GHG emissions reduction potential to offer a more accurate picture of future GHG emissions growth and the responsibility of the City for further GHG emissions reduction.

Business-as-AUsual Forecast
Future GHG emissions were calculated by multiplying projected activity data under the BAU forecast with baseline emission factors, established by the 2019 community GHG emissions inventory. Several indicator growth rates were developed from 2019 activity data and GHG emission levels for GHG emission sectors and applied to demographic projections to estimate future year emissions.

Demographic projections used to develop the BAU forecast included regional job growth projections and population projections and the most recent 6th Cycle (2023-2031) Housing Element Update Sites

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Current and Projected GHG Emissions
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 15
Inventory Assessment for San Ramon. Job and population estimates were revised to include redevelopment of land use parcels that would increase the number of residential dwelling units and the square footage of non-residential development, that was used to develop the City-specific 2040 General Plan and 2023-2031 Housing Element projections. These increases were then used to revise the jobs, and population estimates for San Ramon upward by approximately 224 jobs and 7,061 residents over the 2020-2040 time-period. This results in an increased jobs estimate of 71,999, up from 71,775, and increased population estimate of 110,089, up from 103,028 by 2040. Table 4Table 4 shows the resulting demographic projections. These new job and population growth estimates were used to project changes in GHG emissions over time. This update to the jobs and population projections resulted in an increase in the projected GHG emissions for San Ramon compared to the baseline regional projections. On-road motor vehicles and off-road equipment GHG emissions were separately projected using modeled activity data for the forecast years. Emission factors for the BAU forecast remain constant for all forecast years, derived from the 2019 community GHG emissions inventory.

Table 4 Demographic Projections and Growth Metrics, 2019 - 2045 Demographic 2019 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Population 83,376 90,969 97,342 103,716 110,089 113,058 Employment 53,807 58,387 62,925 67,462 71,999 82,374
Service Population 137,183 149,356 160,267 171,178 182,088 195,432 The results of the BAU forecast show an increase in GHG emissions in all reported GHG emissions sectors, which are directly influenced by growth in the City of San Ramon. Table 5Table 5 and Figure 5 provide a summary of the BAU GHG emissions results for each GHG emissions sector for 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040, and 2045. See Appendix C for additional information on San Ramon’s BAU forecast.

Table 5 BAU GHG Emissions Forecast Results by Sector (MT CO2e) GHG Emissions
Sector
2019
(GHG
Inventory) 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Percent
Change
2019 - 2045
On-road Motor
Vehicles
226,484 247,109 264,423 281,736 299,049 307,114 36%
Natural Gas1 117,360 127,822 137,092 146,362 155,632 165,769 41% Electricity2 42,031 45,787 49,078 52,368 55,659 58,717 40% Off-road
Equipment
33,415 36,380 39,038 41,695 44,353 47,603 42%
Waste 14,931 16,256 17,444 18,631 19,819 21,271 42%
Wastewater
Treatment
Processes
3,562 3,880 4,161 4,442 4,724 5,030 41%
Total 437,784 477,235 511,235 545,236 579,236 605,504 38% All values are presented in metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Totals may not add due to rounding.
1 The Natural Gas GHG emissions sector includes residential and non-residential consumption, as well as methane leakage from natural gas transmission and distribution.
2 The Electricity GHG emissions sector includes residential and non-residential consumption, electricity transmission and distribution losses, electricity embedded in the water supply, and electricity used for wastewater conveyance and treatment.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
16 Figure 5 BAU GHG Emissions Forecast Results by Sector 2030 and 2045 Adjusted Forecast
Several federal and state regulations have been enacted that would reduce San Ramon’s GHG emissions in 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040, and 2045. The impact of these regulations was quantified and incorporated into the adjusted forecast to project anticipated changes in future GHG emissions once established state regulations are implemented. The state legislation included in the adjusted forecast results in GHG emissions reductions related to transportation, building efficiency, and renewable electricity. These regulations include:
 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations) which sets standards for energy-efficient technologies and methods in new buildings to reduce electricity and natural gas consumption in new buildings and increase the use of renewable electricity.
 Renewable Portfolio Standard (SB 100 and SB 1020) which requires investor-owned utilities, publicly owned utilities, electric service providers, and community choice aggregators to increase procurement from eligible renewable energy resources to 50 percent of total procurement by 2026, 60 percent by 2030, 90 percent by 2035, 95 percent by 2040, and 100 percent by 2045. The increase in renewable energy resources reduces the GHG-intensity of electricity.
 Transportation legislation including the Advanced Clean Cars Program (introduced by the California Air Resources Board in 2012), Advanced Clean Truck regulation, and Innovative Clean Transit regulation which work together to increase the fuel efficiency of fossil-fuel powered onroad vehicles and increase the share of zero-emission vehicles on the road.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Current and Projected GHG Emissions
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 17
This adjusted forecast does not consider waste or water reductions from legislation such as AB 341,26 SB 1383,27 or SB X7-7.28 The GHG emission reduction that would be achieved by these will be accounted for in the CAP’s GHG reduction measures, as they require discreet actions the City must initiate, and therefore, the City will be able to take credit for the GHG reduction resulting from the future implementation.

With the regulations considered in the adjusted forecast, San Ramon’s GHG emissions are expected to decline significantly from the GHG emissions level estimated in the BAU forecast. The adjusted forecast shows total community GHG emissions increasing by one percent from 2019 levels through 2045. The primary driver for the GHG emissions reductions in the adjusted forecast relative to the BAU forecast are transportation legislation, with a strong shift to electric vehicles in the commercial sector. Increased availability of renewable energy through RPS requirements drives some GHG emissions reductions; however, these reductions are limited since San Ramon already receives a significant amount of GHG-free electricity through MCE. Table 6Table 6 provides the GHG emissions reduction estimates from regulations considered in the adjusted forecast. Figure 6 and Table 7Table 7 provide the results for the adjusted forecast for 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040, and 2045. See Appendix C for additional information on San Ramon’s adjusted forecast.

Table 6 Legislative Reduction Considered in Adjusted GHG Emissions Forecast (MT CO2e)
Regulation Category 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
2019 Title 24 Code Cycle 1,406 2,586 3,767 4,947 5,497
Renewable Portfolio Standards Requirements 13,989 27,245 36,376 46,287 57,160 Advanced Clean Truck Rule, SAFE Vehicle Rules and
Actions, and Innovative Clean Transit Rule
26,888 51,947 74,378 91,199 99,956
Total 42,284 81,778 114,521 142,433 162,613
All values are presented in metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

Totals may not add due to rounding.
26 AB 341 directed CalRecycle to develop and adopt regulations for mandatory commercial recycling. As of July 2012, businesses were required to recycle and jurisdictions had to implement a program that includes education, outreach, and monitoring. AB 341 also set a Statewide goal to achieve 75 percent waste diversion by 2020. 27 SB 1383 required CARB to approve and begin implementing a comprehensive strategy to reduce emissions of short-lived climate pollutants. The bill requires the strategy to reduce methane emissions 40 percent below 2013 levels by 2030, reduce hydrofluorocarbon emissions by 40 percent below 2013 levels by 2030, and reduce anthropogenic black carbon emissions by 50 percent below 2013 levels by 2030. SB 1383 also required CalRecycle, in consultation with the CARB, to adopt regulations that achieve specified targets for reducing organic waste in landfills. The bill further required 20 percent of edible food disposed of at the time to be recovered by 2025. 28 SB X7-7, also known as the Water Conservation Act, requires all water suppliers to increase water use efficiency. This legislation sets an overall goal of reducing per capita urban water use by 20 percent by 2020.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
18 Figure 6 Adjusted GHG Emissions Forecast Results by Sector 0 100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
2019 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
GHG Emissions (MT CO2e)
On-road Motor Vehicles Natural Gas
Electricity Off-road Equipment
Waste Wastewater Treatment Processes
Business-as-Usual (BAU) Total

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Current and Projected GHG Emissions
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 19
Table 7 Adjusted GHG Emissions Forecast Results by Sector (MT CO2e) GHG Emissions
Sector
2019
(GHG
Inventory) 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Percent
Change
2019 - 2045
On-road Motor
Vehicles
226,484 219,958 211,778 206,254 206,330 205,198 -9%
Natural Gas1 117,360 127,315 136,160 145,005 153,850 163,788 40% Electricity2 42,031 31,161 20,876 14,686 7,727 0 -100%
Off-road
Equipment
33,415 36,380 39,038 41,695 44,353 47,603 42%
Waste 14,931 16,256 17,444 18,631 19,819 21,271 42%
Wastewater
Treatment
Processes
3,562 3,880 4,161 4,442 4,724 5,030 41%
Total 437,784 434,951 429,457 430,715 436,803 442,891 1% All values are presented in metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.

2.3 State Context and San Ramon GHG Emissions Targets
State Context
Over the past two decades, California has adopted extensive legislation, policies, and programs to reduce GHG emissions across California, establishing itself as a global leader in climate action. The primary legislation enumerating State climate targets and driving climate action at the State level are SB 32 and AB 1279. Together these regulations set Statewide GHG reduction targets for 2030 and 2045 and chart a path towards a carbon neutral California. See Appendix A for a full list of relevant State-level legislation and associated climate change scoping plans.  Senate Bill 32. This legislation requires a Statewide reduction in GHG emissions of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. A California Climate Change Scoping Plan was adopted by CARB in 2017 to identify a pathway for the State to achieve this target.  Assembly Bill 1279. This legislation codified the Statewide carbon neutrality goal into a legally binding requirement for California to achieve carbon neutrality no later than 2045 and achieve 85 percent of the overall reduction specifically from GHG emissions reduction as part of that goal. The latest California Climate Change Scoping Plan was adopted by CARB in 2022 to identify a pathway for the State to achieve this goal.

San Ramon 2030 and 2045 GHG Emissions Targets
San Ramon’s targets were set using 2008 per capita GHG emissions (i.e., 8.44 MT CO₂e per person)— the year of San Ramon’s first GHG inventory. Using per capita emissions to set the targets recognizes the significant population and economic growth San Ramon is anticipating over the next two decades.

A per capita approach lends to emissions reduction efforts that are fair and scalable, emphasizing

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
20 practical, community-focused efforts that pace reductions with population and economic growth.29 San Ramon’s targets were set by reducing 2008 per capita GHG emissions in a linear trajectory to net zero per capita emissions in 2045. Because 2008 emissions are estimated to be 15 percent above 1990 levels,30 these targets can be compared to the State’s goals relative to 1990 emissions levels. As shown in Table 8 and Figure 7, San Ramon’s resulting short- and long-term per capita GHG emissions reduction targets are:
 Reduce per capita GHG emissions by 53 percent below 1990 levels by 2030; and  Achieve carbon neutrality by 2045.

The San Ramon 2030 and 2045 GHG emissions reduction targets exceed California’s goal to reduce per capita GHG emissions 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 (SB 32) and align with California’s goal to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045 (AB 1279) defined as reducing GHG emissions at least 85 percent below 1990 levels and removing or sequestering the remaining GHG emissions.

Table 8 San Ramon 2030 and 2045 Per Capita GHG Emissions Reduction Targets Year
Per Capita GHG Emissions
(MT CO2e/capita) Percent Change Since 1990 (%)
1990 Per Capita GHG Emissions1 7.34 0%
2008 Per Capita GHG Emissions 8.44 15%
2019 Per Capita GHG Emissions 5.25 (28%)
2030 Per Capita GHG Emissions Reduction Target2 3.42 (53%) 2045 Per Capita GHG Emissions Reduction Target2 0.00 (100%) Notes: ( ) denotes a negative value; MT CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. 1 1990 per capita GHG emissions were estimated by reducing 2008 per capita emissions by 15% in alignment with the 1990 emissions estimation methodology cited in the Association of Environmental Professionals’ Beyond 2020 and Newhall final white paper.
2 The 2030 and 2045 per capita GHG emissions reduction targets were set by reducing 2008 per capita GHG emissions in a straight line to net zero in 2045.
29 California Air Resources Board (CARB) (2017). California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, p. 99-102. Accessed January 2025 at:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf. 30 According to the Association of Environmental Professionals’ Beyond 2020 and Newhall final white paper, in the 2008 AB 32 Scoping Plan, the recommended target for local governments to meet 1990 levels was 15 percent below “current” levels by 2020, where “current” levels were construed as baseline years between 2005-2008.

Association of Environmental Professionals (2016). Final White Paper Beyond 2020 and Newhall: A Field Guide to New CEQA Greenhouse Gas Thresholds and Climate Action Plan Targets for California. Accessed January 2025 at: A Field Guide to New CEQA Greenhouse Gas Thresholds and Climate Action Plan Targets for California.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Current and Projected GHG Emissions
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 21
Figure 7 San Ramon 2030 and 2045 Per Capita GHG Emissions Reduction Targets For ease in tracking with GHG emissions reduction, the 2030 and 2045 targets are translated to mass emissions. As depicted in Figure 8, the targets equate to reducing GHG emissions to 332,995 MT CO2e in 2030 and net 0 MT CO2e in 2045. Figure 8 depicts San Ramon’s resulting GHG emissions reduction pathway and displays the emissions reduction needed to be achieved through local action to meet the targets (i.e., the area between the adjusted forecast and GHG emissions reduction target pathway). The next chapter, Chapter 3, presents the strategies San Ramon will implement to achieve the 2030 target and make substantial progress towards the 2045 target for carbon neutrality through local action. See Appendix C for additional information regarding San Ramon GHG emissions reduction targets and Appendix E for the San Ramon 2022 GHG inventory update. The 2022 GHG invenotry update shows San Ramon’s continued progress and downward trend toward meeting the GHG reduction targets.
2019 Per Capita Emissions

5.25 MT CO 2e/capita
2030 Target

3.42 MT CO 2e/capita 2045 Target
0 MT CO2e/capita
-

1.00 2.00

3.00 4.00

5.00 6.00

7.00 8.00
2019 2030 2045
GHG Emissions per Capita (MT CO2e/capita)
GHG Emissions Reduction Needed Business-as-Usual (BAU) Forecast Adjusted Forecast GHG Emissions Reduction Targets
1990 Per Capita Emissions

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
22 Figure 8 San Ramon 2030 and 2045 Mass GHG Emissions Reduction Targets 2019 Emissions
437,784 MT CO2e
2030 Target
332,995 MT CO2e
2045 Target
0 MT CO2e
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
2019 2030 2045
GHG Emissions (MT CO2e)
GHG Emissions Reduction Needed Business-as-Usual (BAU) Forecast GHG Emissions Reduction Targets Adjusted Forecast
1990 Emissions

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) GHG Reduction Measures Framework
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 23
3 GHG Reduction Measures Framework

3.1 GHG Reduction Measures Overview
The City of San Ramon developed a set of GHG emissions reduction measures that serve as a roadmap to reduce and sequester communitywide GHG emissions to meet the San Ramon targets. Most measures focus on reducing GHG emissions. These measures intend to prevent GHG emissions from being emitted into the atmosphere during the consumption of energy and water, use of transportation vehicle types and modes, or the generation of solid waste and wastewater. A few measures—the “Cornerstone” and “Nature-based Carbon Sequestration” Measures—also focus on sequestering emissions. Carbon sequestration is the process of removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by capturing and storing atmospheric carbon dioxide. These measures are critical for San Ramon’s longer-term target for carbon neutrality, as they will help offset GHG emissions remaining from sectors that are hard to decarbonize.

The GHG emissions reduction measures focus on emissions reduction across several sectors within the community. Opportunities for reduction from energy usage include improving energy efficiency in buildings, transitioning to electric systems to reduce reliance on natural gas, and expanding access to carbon-free electricity through MCE. In transportation, opportunities for reduction include accelerating the adoption of ZEVs, enhancing public transit, and promoting active transportation.

Additionally, waste diversion programs that lower solid waste generation and increase organics diversion would reduce landfill-related emissions, while initiatives to reduce water consumption would reduce emissions related to the distribution and treatment of water and wastewater. The GHG emissions reduction measures also focus on carbon sequestration from natural systems.

Opportunities for nature-based carbon sequestration include preserving open spaces, expanding the urban forest, and improving soil health through compost application. By leveraging these opportunities, San Ramon would not only align with State climate mandates but also position itself to benefit from emerging funding opportunities, technological advancements, and regional partnerships.

This chapter presents the strategies, including specific measures and actions, that would enable meaningful emissions reductions, helping San Ramon meet its climate objectives. Measures and actions are organized according to the following hierarchy presented in Figure 9.

Figure 9 San Ramon’s Climate Action Measure Structure

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
24 Strategies, measures, and actions have been included to incorporate GHG reduction best practices that are currently being implemented by other communities. These have been specifically designed to achieve San Ramon’s fair share of GHG emissions reductions by achieving San Ramon’s 2030 GHG reduction target and making substantial progress towards San Ramon’s 2045 target for carbon neutrality. The GHG reduction measures and actions for this CAP were developed through an iterative process with the community, CAP Task Force, and City staff and decision-makers; informed by the 2019 GHG Inventory and 2030 and 2045 GHG forecasts and targets. Strategies define the GHG emissions category in which the GHG emissions reductions will take place and include Cornerstone; Energy; Transportation; Waste; Water and Wastewater; Implementation by City; and Nature-based Carbon Sequestration.

Measures and actions can be either quantitative or supportive, defined as follows:
 Quantitative. Quantitative measures and actions result in quantifiable GHG emissions reduction when implemented. GHG emissions reduction from these measures and actions are supported by case studies, scientific articles, calculations, or other third-party substantial evidence.  Supportive. Supportive measures and actions may also be quantifiable and have substantial evidence to support their overall contribution to GHG reduction. However, due to one of several factors—including a low GHG emissions reduction effect, indirect GHG emissions reduction benefit, or potential for double-counting—such measures will not be quantified and do not contribute directly to the expected GHG emissions reduction target and consistency with the State goals. For example, municipal-specific measures are not quantified, as they represent a subset of communitywide emissions and as such could be characterized as double-counting.

Despite not being quantified, supportive measures/actions are nevertheless critical to the overall success of the CAP and provide support so that the quantitative measures and actions will be successfully implemented.

3.2 Climate Action Implementation Pillars
San Ramon climate action planning is built on key pillars that are essential for effective implementation. Each pillar is detailed in Figure 10.

The Equity pillar focuses on vulnerable communities or populations within San Ramon and residents living on low and moderate incomes. These Vulnerable populations may be most affected by economic, health, and environmental burdens. These populations include people with disabilities, access, or function needs and individuals exhibiting social vulnerability factors including language barriers, social isolation, and infirmities of aging. San Ramon residents living on low and moderate incomes may also be affected by economic burdens. The Equity pillar focuses on these vulnerable populationscommunity members to reduce potential burdens through climate action.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) GHG Reduction Measures Framework
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 25
Figure 10 San Ramon Climate Action Implementation Pillars

Feasibility: Actions that help the City understand the costs, benefits, obstacles, and opportunities associated with programs, policies, and ordinances to make decisions that best serve the community.

Funding: Actions that provide the financial backing (e.g., grant funding, rebates, financial incentives) and adequate City staffing to establish, implement, and maintain a program.

Structural Change: Actions that change existing City programs, policies, and ordinances to allow the City and community to reach the target established within a measure.

Partnerships: Actions that establish partnerships with external government entities, including Tribes, and community-based organizations to leverage their expertise, resources, and networks to implement programs and policies the City would not be able to achieve alone.

Education: Actions to increase community awareness of programs available to reduce individual contributions to GHG emissions and increase resilience and to establish or strengthen communication channels between the City and the communities it serves.

Equity: Actions that engage vulnerable populations and residents living on low and moderate incomes in the decision-making process and establish policies and programs to provide vulnerable populationssuch community members with the resources to benefit from each measure’s objectives in an equitable manner.

3.3 Measure Cost Savings
Many GHG reduction measures would not only reduce GHG emissions but also generate longer-term cost savings for both the City and the community over the life of CAP implementation. While some measures require additional upfront investments, they often lead to operational efficiencies, lower energy consumption, and avoided future costs. For example, increasing the adoption of passenger and municipal fleet ZEVs can offer substantial savings through reduced fuel and maintenance expenses compared to gasoline-powered vehicles.31 Additionally, the City, residents, and businesses can further benefit from off-peak electric vehicle charging, driving down energy costs over time.32 These operational and maintenance cost savings will likely offset the higher upfront costs to purchase a ZEV compared to a conventional vehicle with an internal combustion engine upon replacement.

Additionally, the CAP measures focus on transitioning to ZEVs, electric building appliances, and zeroemission off-road equipment at the time-of-replacement or at the end of the existing equipment’s useful life. This timing not only reduces waste and avoids additional manufacturing emissions but also allows for cost savings. For example, while the total upfronts costs of a heat pump water heater are higher than that of a gas one, the incremental costs, or differential costs, are only slightly higher when comparing the two. These incremental costs can potentially be offset to produce incremental cost 31 Petek, G. Legislative Analysist Office (2023). Assessing California’s Climate Policies—Implications for State Transportation Funding and Programs. Accessed December 2024 at: https://www.lao.ca.gov/reports/2023/4821/ZEV-Impacts-on-Transportation-121323.pdf. 32 Stewart, S. National Bureau of Economic Research (2024). Shifting Electric Vehicle Owners to Off-Peak Charging. Accessed December 2024 at: https://www.nber.org/digest/202401/shifting-electric-vehicle-owners-peak-charging.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
26 savings (i.e., making a heat pump water heater installation cheaper than a gas water heater installation) using federal, State, and regional incentives, if available, and for those community members who qualify. Currently, federal programs such as the High Efficiency Electric Home Rebate (HEEHRA), the Homeowner Managing Energy Savings (HOMES) Rebate, and the Inflation Reduction Act, along with State programs like Clean California, regional initiatives from the Bay Area Regional Energy Network (BayREN) Home + Program and the Bay Area Multifamily Building Enhancements (BAMBE) Program, and local rebates from Marin Clean Energy, offer significant funding to support the installation of electric and heat pump appliances in San Ramon, helping residents’ transition away from gas appliances.33 By prioritizing such time-of-replacement measures, San Ramon would position itself for a cost-effective transition to more sustainable GHG reduction measures.

3.4 Measure Co-Benefits
Climate action measures were designed to produce additional co-benefits beyond GHG emissions reductions that the community will see from implementing the CAP. These co-benefits will have longterm positive impacts that will help San Ramon reach its community goals. The co-benefits identified for each CAP measure include the following:

Improved Public Health
Phasing out gas stoves and fossil-fuel heating systems (Measures E-2 through E-4) and increasing use of zero-emission vehicles (Measures T-5 through T-7) will reduce indoor and outdoor pollutants known to exacerbate asthma and respiratory conditions.34,35 Promoting active transportation (Measures T-1 and T-2) and accessible green spaces (Measure C-1) further encourages healthier lifestyles, improved fitness, and reduced stress for all community members.

Community Resilience and Safety
Upgrading municipal infrastructure and preparing for climate hazards—such as wildfire-resistant landscapes (Measure C-1), distributed renewable energy and storage (Measure E-5), and coordinated microtransit services (Measure T-3)—increases San Ramon’s ability to respond to and recover from extreme heat, flooding, drought, and wildfires. In addition to the San Ramon 2040 General Plan policies within the Safety Element related to climate change adaption and resilience strategies, this CAP assists with resilience planning by helping San Ramon have safer neighborhoods, more reliable services, and quicker economic recovery when facing climate-related disruptions.36 Environmental Quality and Ecosystem Services
Conserving and managing open spaces (Measure C-1), enhancing composting programs (Measure W3), and implementing nature-based carbon sequestration (Measure CS-1) improve water quality, reduce flood risks, and bolster local biodiversity. These measures also maintain healthy soils, cleaner 33 Marin Clean Energy. Get Cash for Heat Pump Water Heater Upgrades. Accessed December 2024 at: https://mcecleanenergy.org/heatpump-water-heater-incentive/. 34 Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health (2024). Switching from gas to electric stoves cuts indoor air pollution. Accessed December 2024 at: https://phys.org/news/2024-07-gas-electric-stoves-indoor-air.html 35 Scientific American (2024). Shifting to EVs Could Prevent Millions of Childhood Asthma Attacks. Accessed December 2024 at:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/shifting-to-evs-could-prevent-millions-of-childhood-asthma-attacks/ 36 MIT Climate Portal (2021). Climate-Resilient Infrastructure. Accessed December 2024 at: https://climate.mit.edu/explainers/climateresilient-infrastructure

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) GHG Reduction Measures Framework
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 27
creeks, and vibrant habitats, creating thriving ecosystems that support recreation, wildlife, and pollinators.37
Local Economic Opportunities
Investing in building electrification, renewable energy projects (Measures E-2 through E-5), and electric vehicle infrastructure (Measures T-6 and T-7) stimulates green job growth and attracts sustainable businesses. These initiatives help diversify San Ramon’s economy, fostering opportunities in emerging clean industries, energy services, and construction trades, ensuring long-term financial stability and competitiveness.38
Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
Adopting 100% clean community power (Measure E-1) and electrifying buildings (Measures E-2 through E-4) can lower energy bills over time, while widespread EV charging infrastructure (Measure T-6) reduces fuel costs and maintenance needs. Additionally, water conservation efforts (Measure WW-2) and the efficient use of recycled water (Measure WW-1) help stabilize utility expenses, making it more affordable for residents and businesses to thrive.39,40 Enhanced Community Character and Quality
Expanding and improving open spaces and trails (Measure C-1), implementing safer bike and pedestrian infrastructure (Measures T-1 and T-2), and increasing tree canopy coverage (Measure CS1) create more inviting, walkable neighborhoods. These changes enhance San Ramon’s identity, promote community pride, and make San Ramon an even more pleasant place to live, work, and visit.

Sustainable Land Use and Transportation Connection
This CAP prioritizes human-centered economic corridors, such as transit-oriented development and multi-use active transportation trails near land uses (Measures T-1 and T-2). A major co-benefit of a CAP is the promotion of intentional, sustainable planning (i.e., smart growth) that supports San Ramon’s climate goals.

3.5 CAP Measures Implementation Cost Ranges
Climate action plans exhibit high variability in implementation costs depending on the GHG emissions reduction measures identified, their level of specificity, and the accompanying funding and financing strategies, which may vary depending on the scope of the project. The cost range estimates are based on cost data derived from case studies and available research. For each GHG emissions reduction measure, the cost description focuses on both internal (City) costs and external (community) costs and reflects the variability of these costs by taking into account different cost variables such as upfront costs, lifecycle costs, incremental or marginal costs, and cost savings opportunities. 37 Schuch et al. (2017). Water in the city: Green open spaces, land use planning and flood management. Accessed December 2024 at:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837716306081 38 World Economic Forum (2024). Why we must build out energy infrastructure now to drive the energy transition. Accessed December 2024 at: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/12/fit-for-future-building-energy-infrastructure-ahead-to-drive-the-energy-transition/ 39 Lacey Tan, Mohammad Hassan Fathollahzadeh, and Edie Taylor (2022). The Economics of Electrifying Buildings: Residential New Construction. Accessed December 2024 at: https://building-performance.org/wpcontent/uploads/2023/01/rmi_economics_electrifying_buildings_residential_new_construction.pdf 40 Mastoi at al. (2022). An in-depth analysis of electric vehicle charging station infrastructure, policy implications, and future trends. Accessed December 2024 at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484722017346

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
28  Internal costs are those experienced by the City (i.e., City staff time and capital costs) while external costs are those felt by the community (i.e., residents and businesses).  Upfront costs include the costs associated with purchasing and installing an item, including any City staff time spent on related activities like procurement, planning, or ordinance development.  Lifecycle costs refer to the ongoing expenses or cost savings generated from the operating, maintaining, and disposing of that item, and can also include City staff time spent on enforcement, monitoring, and compliance over the item’s lifespan.  Incremental or marginal costs refer to the difference between the total upfront expense of a conventional system and that of the higher-efficiency or zero-emission system. While the new technology may have a greater overall purchase and installation cost, the additional amount— or increment—is typically modest and can be further reduced, or even made cheaper than the conventional option, when available rebates, incentives, and other cost offsets are factored in.  Cost savings are the net reduction in expenses realized when the incremental costs associated with these new technologies are partially or fully offset by incentives, rebates, or other financial supports. These savings can also include lower operating and maintenance costs over the lifetime of the equipment, making the overall expense of adopting zero-emission options more affordable than sticking with conventional systems.

The GHG measures proposed for the CAP and listed in Table 10Table 10 below, have been broken down into four cost segments, as defined in Table 9Table 9.

Table 9 Cost Categories
Cost Tier Cost and Staff Time City Cost Assumptions
Community Cost
Assumptions
No Cost/
Cost
Savings
City Costs:
 $0 or cost savings
 0 hours – negligible City staff time needed.

Community Costs:
 $0 hours – negligible City staff time
needed.

Measures associated with
operational changes that do
not include upfront costs or
lifecycle costs, and/or may
result in cost savings.

Measures associated
with changes that do
not include upfront
costs or lifecycle costs,
and/or may result in
cost savings.

Low Cost City Costs:
 $1 – $50,000
 0-250 hours – a maximum of 250 hours of
existing City staff time needed per year.1
Community Costs:
 $1 – $1,000
Measures associated with low
upfront costs, and only
require staff and/or
consultant time to
implement.

Measures associated
with low upfront costs
compared to existing
alternatives.

Moderate
Cost
City Costs:
 $50,000 -- $500,000
 250+ hours – more than 250 hours of an
existing City staff person’s time per year;
including needing to hire new full-time
City staff (~2,000 hours per year).1
Community Costs:
 $1,000 – $5,000
Measures associated with
moderate upfront costs to the
City and require moderate
capital costs and/or
consultant time along with
staff time.

Measures associated
with moderate upfront
costs that are not
comparable to existing
costs nor are they
offset over lifetime.

High Cost City Costs:
 $500,000+
Community Costs:
 $5,000+
Measures associated with
high upfront costs and
require substantial
investments in infrastructure
and technology system
upgrades.

Measures associated
with high upfront costs
that are not
comparable to existing
cost nor are offset over
lifetime.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) GHG Reduction Measures Framework
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 29

3.6 San Ramon Strategies and Measures Summary
Table 10Table 10 summarizes the Measures associated with each of the seven Strategies and presents the GHG emissions reduction, cost tiers (as defined in Table 9Table 9), and co-benefits associated with each Measure. The following sections provide the Actions that accompany each Measure along with the associated co-benefits and cost tiers.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan 30Table 10 San Ramon GHG Emissions Reduction Measure Summary Strategy/Measure
GHG Emissions Reduction Potential
(MT CO2e) Cost Tier Categorization
2030 2045 City Community Co-Benefits
Cornerstone Measure C-1: Conserve and manage the existing open spaces, natural lands, and trail system in San Ramon to reinforce the community’s defining characteristics and increase carbon sequestration on these lands.

Supportive of Strategy
Supportive of Strategy
Moderate Cost No Cost/Cost
Savings
 Community Resilience and Safety  Enhanced Community Character and Quality
 Environmental Quality and Ecosystem
Services
 Improved Public Health
Building Energy Measure E-1: Work with MCE to have 100% clean community power supply at least 94% of residential electricity and 65% of commercial electricity in the community by 2030. 14,213 0 Low Cost Low Cost  Improved Public Health
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
Measure E-2: Decarbonize 100% of new residential and commercial construction by 2026. 6,195 32,741 Low Cost No Cost/
Cost Savings to Low Cost
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Improved Public Health  Local Economic Opportunities Measure E-3: Electrify 14% of existing residential buildings by 2030 and 57% by 2045. 11,255 49,490 Moderate Cost Moderate Cost  Community Resilience and Safety  Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Improved Public Health  Local Economic Opportunities Measure E-4: Electrify 2% of existing commercial buildings by 2030 and 33% by 2045. 853 13,634 Low Cost Moderate Cost  Community Resilience and Safety  Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Improved Public Health  Local Economic Opportunities Measure E-5: Increase generation and storage of local community-scale renewable energy.

Supportive of Strategy
Supportive of Strategy
Low Cost Moderate Cost
to High Cost
 Community Resilience and Safety  Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Improved Public Health  Local Economic Opportunities

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 234
Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan GHG Reduction Measures Framework
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 31
Strategy/Measure
GHG Emissions Reduction Potential
(MT CO2e) Cost Tier Categorization
2030 2045 City Community Co-Benefits
Measure E-6: Monitor and maintain equitable implementation and benefits of energy strategies.

Supportive of Strategy
Supportive of Strategy
Low Cost No Cost/
Cost Savings
 Community Resilience and Safety  Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Improved Public Health  Local Economic Opportunities Transportation Measure T-1: Implement and regularly update the Bicycle Master Plan and Walking District Master Plan as needed to reduce vehicle miles traveled and achieve an active transportation mode share of 3% by 2030 and 8% by 2045. 600 2,254 High Cost No Cost/
Cost Savings to Low Cost
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Enhanced Community Character and Quality
 Improved Public Health  Sustainable Land Use and
Transportation Connection
Measure T-2: Promote active transportation mode shift by enhancing 37 miles of vehicle roadways into active transportation corridors by 2040 that extend safe active transportation routes from residential areas into the downtown core.

Supportive of Measure T-1
Supportive of Measure T-1
Moderate Cost to High Cost
No Cost/ Cost Savings to Low Cost
 Community Resilience and Safety  Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Enhanced Community Character and Quality
 Improved Public Health  Sustainable Land Use and
Transportation Connection
Measure T-3: Implement a new zero-emission local microtransit service to connect commuters to major public transit and target a public transit mode share of 14% by 2030 and 16% by 2045. 3,191 4,904 Moderate Cost
to High Cost
No Cost/ Cost Savings
 Community Resilience and Safety  Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Enhanced Community Character and Quality
 Improved Public Health  Sustainable Land Use and
Transportation Connection
Measure T-4: Reduce vehicle miles traveled by emphasizing increased affordable housing in higher density areas as established by the Housing Element Update.

Supportive of Measures T-1 and T-3
Supportive of Measures T-1 and T-3
Low Cost No Cost/
Cost Savings
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Improved Public Health  Local Economic Opportunities  Sustainable Land Use and Transportation Connection

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 235
Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan 32
Strategy/Measure
GHG Emissions Reduction Potential
(MT CO2e) Cost Tier Categorization
2030 2045 City Community Co-Benefits
Measure T-5: Transition 100% the municipal vehicle fleet to zero-emission vehicles (ZEV) by 2045.

Supportive of Measures T-6 and T-7
Supportive of Measures T-6 and T-7
Low to Moderate Cost
No Cost/ Cost Savings
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Improved Public Health Measure T-6: Increase passenger zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) adoption to 30% by 2030 and 100% by 2045. 33,038 155,696 Moderate Cost Low Cost  Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Improved Public Health  Local Economic Opportunities Measure T-7: Increase commercial zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) adoption to 25% by 2030 and 100% by 2045. 9,478 42,335 Low Cost Low Cost to
Moderate Cost
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Improved Public Health  Local Economic Opportunities Measure T-8: Work with Bishop Ranch to modify the Transportation Demand Management Program to achieve a 1.6 Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) among 30% of employers by 2030 and 60% by 2045.

Supportive of Strategy
Supportive of Strategy
Low Cost to Moderate Cost
Low Cost  Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
Measure T-9: Electrify or otherwise decarbonize 12% of off-road equipment by 2030 and 100% by 2045. 4,840 10,082 Moderate Cost Low Cost to
Moderate Cost
 Improved Public Health  Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits Waste Measure W-1: Reduce landfilled organic waste 75% by 2030 and 90% by 2045. 13,083 19,144 Moderate Cost Low Cost  Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Environmental Quality and Ecosystem
Services
 Enhanced Community Character and
Quality
Measure W-2: Reduce the carbon footprint of the food system by reducing waste, promoting climate friendly diets, and getting excess food to communities in need.

Supportive of Strategy
Supportive of Strategy
Low Cost Low Cost to
Moderate Cost
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Enhanced Community Character and Quality
 Improved Public Health

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 236
Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan GHG Reduction Measures Framework
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 33
Strategy/Measure
GHG Emissions Reduction Potential
(MT CO2e) Cost Tier Categorization
2030 2045 City Community Co-Benefits
Measure W-3: Develop a communitywide composting program to achieve SB 1383 procurement requirements. 1,791 2,080 Moderate Cost No Cost/
Cost Savings
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Environmental Quality and Ecosystem Services
 Enhanced Community Character and
Quality
 Improved Public Health
Water and Wastewater Measure WW-1: Coordinate with the Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) and East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) to increase purple pipe infrastructure in the community and increase recycled water supply.

Supportive of Strategy
Supportive of Strategy
Low Cost Low Cost  Community Resilience and Safety
 Environmental Quality and Ecosystem
Services
 Local Economic Opportunities  Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Enhanced Community Character and Quality
Measure WW-2: Reduce community water consumption 10% by 2030 and 20% by 2045, from 2019 levels.

Supportive of Strategy
Supportive of Strategy
Moderate Cost Low Cost  Community Resilience and Safety  Environmental Quality and Ecosystem
Services
 Local Economic Opportunities  Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Enhanced Community Character and Quality
Nature-based Carbon Sequestration Measure CS-1: Develop and implement programs to increase nature-based carbon sequestration within the community.

Supportive of Strategy
Supportive of Strategy
Moderate Cost Low Cost  Improved Public Health
 Environmental Quality and Ecosystem
Services
 Enhanced Community Character and
Quality

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 237
Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan 34
Strategy/Measure
GHG Emissions Reduction Potential
(MT CO2e) Cost Tier Categorization
2030 2045 City Community Co-Benefits
Implementation by City Measure IMP-1: Support the development of programs that educate and engage youths on climate change and envisioning a carbon neutral future.

Supportive of Strategy
Supportive of Strategy
Low Cost No Cost/
Cost Savings to Low Cost
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits  Enhanced Community Character and Quality
 Environmental Quality and Ecosystem
Services
Measure IMP-2: Support the San Ramon climate action program with appropriate City staffing to implement, evaluate, and update the CAP though regular monitoring and a continued feedback loop with the community.

Supportive of Strategy
Supportive of Strategy
Moderate Cost41
No Cost/ Cost Savings
 Community Resilience and Safety  Environmental Quality and Ecosystem Services
 Local Economic Opportunities
Total 98,537 332,360
41 Represents moderate costs on an annual basis.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 238
Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan GHG Reduction Measures Framework
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 35
Anticipated Total GHG Emissions Reduction Summary
By strategically implementing the strategies, measures, and actions outlined in this CAP, San Ramon is positioned to reduce its communitywide GHG emissions by approximately 98,537 MT CO2e by 2030.

This level of reduction meets San Ramon’s near-term 2030 target and, if sustained, places San Ramon on track to reduce emissions to an estimated 332,360 MT CO2e by 2045. This approach not only supports compliance with state climate policy but also prudently manages resources to make meaningful progress toward carbon neutrality. See Appendix D for details on the calculations and substantial evidence used to quantify the GHG emissions reduction of each Measure.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
36 4 Cornerstone Strategy

4.1 Context
San Ramon’s rich network of open spaces, natural lands, and trails is integral to the community’s identity and sense of place. Measure C-1 was developed as San Ramon’s cornerstone strategy, because it not only safeguards these defining landscapes but also demonstrates how meaningful climate-focused actions can align with broader community values. By emphasizing preservation, equitable access, and carbon sequestration, Measure C-1 aims to elevate environmental quality, strengthen resilience, and foster a culture of stewardship among residents and visitors while supporting San Ramon’s emissions reduction goals.

A cornerstone measure serves as the foundation for climate action planning, embodying key principles that ensure strategies are effective, equitable, and implementable. The six actions under Measure C-1 illustrate these principles by focusing on preserving contiguous open space, regularly assessing and enhancing carbon sequestration potential, engaging underrepresented communities to overcome access barriers, and collaborating with regional partners to expand resources and funding opportunities. These actions also emphasize gathering detailed data on how residents use local open spaces—such as numbers of visitors, travel modes, and distances—to inform future efforts to reduce vehicle miles traveled and increase equitable access. Together, these strategies will help San Ramon increase local potential for carbon sequestration while boosting public health, protecting natural habitats, and ensuring that community members can benefit from San Ramon’s treasured open spaces and trails.

As the cornerstone measure, Measure C-1 exemplifies the key pillars of climate planning—feasibility, funding, structural change, partnerships, education, and equity—and demonstrates how climate solutions can align with the community’s values and priorities. Implementing emissions reduction strategies and actions, such as Measure C-1 and others outlined in this CAP, is essential to meeting, and possibly exceeding, long-term emissions reduction targets.

4.2 Cornerstone Measures and Actions Detail
Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure C-1 are included in Table 11Table 11.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Cornerstone Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 37
Table 11 Measure C-1 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
C-1a Encourage efforts to increase equitable access to open spaces, natural lands, and trails, reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and maintain and increase carbon sequestration potential.

C-1b Conduct a natural lands carbon stock inventory and work with Contra Costa County to identify carbon sequestration strategies for San Ramon’s open spaces and natural lands-including on City-owned lands. Regularly update the natural lands carbon stock inventory to track progress over time.

Additionally, obtain data on the use of San Ramon open spaces, natural lands, and trails (e.g., number of visitors, distanced traveled, mode of travel, distanced traveled to the space and mode of transportation) and track it on an annual basis. Utilize data to promote, support grant applications for, and analyze access to San Ramon’s open spaces, natural lands, and trails. Work with the Conservation Easement holders and within the constraints of those easements.

C-1c Directly engage residents living on low and moderate incomes and vulnerable communities to identify barriers to accessing and enjoying San Ramon’s open spaces, natural lands, and trails. Develop partnerships and programs to address these barriers if determined necessary.

C-1d Leverage San Ramon’s vision for equitable open space to pursue local and state funding to continue to develop a natural lands carbon stock inventory, and preserve, manage, and expand San Ramon’s open spaces, natural lands, and trails.

C-1e Conduct educational campaigns for community members and school children on the public health, equity, and climate benefits of preserving and expanding San Ramon’s open spaces, natural lands, and trails. Incorporate this education into annual programs (such as the Trails Challenge and Coastal Cleanup Days) and the San Ramon Trails Mobile App, where feasible, to brand San Ramon as a City for equitable open space.

C-1f Continue partnerships with San Ramon’s Open Space Partners and expand partnerships to community-based organizations like the Contra Costa Resource Conservation District, Friends of San Ramon Creek, and East Bay Parks to reach more community members and gain support for San Ramon’s equitable open space vision as it connects to climate goals.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 Supportive measure and actions
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Moderate Cost
 Community Cost: No Cost/Cost Savings
Co-Benefits
 Community Resilience and Safety
 Enhanced Community Character and Quality
 Environmental Quality and Ecosystem Services
 Improved Public Health

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
38 5 Energy Strategy

5.1 Context
The City of San Ramon’s CAP energy measures (E) focus on expanding the use of carbon-free electricity, advancing building electrification, and supporting opportunities for local renewable energy generation and storage. By partnering with MCE to provide 100 percent renewable and carbon-free electricity by 2030, San Ramon aims to comply with State goals for GHG reduction and enhance longterm energy reliability.42 Implementing updated ordinances for both new and existing buildings will help reduce dependence on natural gas and other non-renewable sources, ultimately contributing to improved indoor and outdoor air quality, stable long-term utility costs, and enhanced public health.43 Building Electrification and Clean Community Power
A key aspect of these efforts is ensuring that building electrification remains cost-effective for property owners and tenants. Studies have shown that switching from natural gas appliances to efficient electric alternatives—such as heat pumps for space heating and cooling, induction cooktops, and heat pump water heaters—can lower long-term operating and maintenance costs. For example, homeowners who replace aging gas furnaces with electric heat pumps often achieve lower monthly energy bills due to improved efficiency and reduced maintenance.44 Similarly, businesses can stabilize operating costs by pairing electric equipment with onsite solar and battery storage systems, which can reduce peak demand charges and hedge against future utility rate increases.45 Ongoing feasibility studies would identify the most cost-effective strategies for local conditions, while outreach and education initiatives would help San Ramon property owners and residents understand the financial advantages of electrification.

To achieve these goals, the City will collaborate with MCE to provide communitywide access to renewable power and manage community opt-out rates (Measure E-1). San Ramon will also work to decarbonize new construction (Measure E-2) and develop practical strategies to electrify existing residential (Measure E-3) and commercial buildings (Measure E-4), leveraging MCE’s renewable power to decarbonize the operational footprint of San Ramon’s buildings. Decarbonization refers to the process of significantly reducing and/or working towards eliminating carbon dioxide and other GHG emissions from activities, systems, or products. It typically involves transitioning away from highcarbon fuels, improving energy efficiency, and adopting low- or zero-emission technologies and practices. The goal is to lower overall carbon intensity, recognizing that complete elimination may not be immediately feasible but striving for reductions over time. As the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Air DistrictBAAQMD) implements stricter regulations to reduce GHG emissions and improve regional air quality, these proactive electrification measures will position San Ramon to 42 California Energy Commission (2020). The Challenge of Retail Gas in California’s Low-Carbon Future. Accessed December 2024 at:
https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2021-06/CEC-500-2019-055-F.pdf 43 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2024). Research on Health Effects from Air Pollution. Accessed December 2024 at:
https://www.epa.gov/air-research/research-health-effects-air-pollution 44 Rocky Mountain Institute (2018). The Economics of Electrifying Buildings. Accessed December 2024 at: https://rmi.org/insight/theeconomics-of-electrifying-buildings/ 45 California Energy Commission (2021). Integrated Energy Policy Report. Accessed December 2024 at: https://www.energy.ca.gov/datareports/reports/integrated-energy-policy-report/2021-integrated-energy-policy-report

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Energy Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 39
comply with evolving standards.46 By preparing early, the City can streamline permitting processes, provide clear guidance to property owners, and potentially reduce long-term compliance costs.

Renewable Energy Generation and Storage
Beyond electrification, San Ramon’s CAP encourages investment in local renewable energy generation and storage solutions (Measure E-5) to improve energy resilience, manage utility costs, and mitigate risks associated with climate change. To maintain consistent and equitable progress, the City will monitor implementation and engage with the community, including residents living on low and moderate incomes and vulnerable communities (Measure E-6). This iterative approach will allow San Ramon to refine its strategies as needed, ensuring that all community members can access the benefits of the clean energy initiatives and that they align with practical solutions, sound financial management, and the community’s long-term interests.

Collectively, these measures position San Ramon for a reliable, cost-effective, and lower-carbon energy future. Through thoughtful planning, practical investments, ongoing community engagement, and readiness for BAAQMD the Air District’s requirements, San Ramon will pursue climate goals while prioritizing local interests, operational feasibility, and fiscal responsibility.

5.2 Energy Measures and Actions Detail
Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure E-1 are included in Table 12Table 12.

Table 12 Measure E-1 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
E-1a Adopt a resolution to automatically enroll all San Ramon new and existing accounts in MCE’s Deep Green option by 2030 (or similar option providing 100% renewable and carbon-free electricity).

E-1b Continue to work with MCE to conduct an annual analysis of opt-out rates in the community and expand the research to understand the community’s concerns with switching to 100% renewable electricity. Include targeted outreach to residents living on low and moderate incomes, vulnerable communities, emergency buildings, and those who are opting-out of MCE.

E-1c Partner with community-based organizations to help community members living on low and moderate incomes grow awareness of MCE’s California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE) and Family Electric Rate Assistance (FERA) programs and receive decreased electricity rates.
46 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2022). Current Rules. Accessed December 2024 at: https://www.baaqmd.gov/en/rules-andcompliance/current-rules

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
40 Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
E-1d Work with MCE to continue or expand the funding and subsidy plan/program for customers enrolled in the CARE or FERA programs to switch to MCE’s Deep Green option. This may include subsidizing costs to customers who participate in CARE/FERA programs through non-discounted customer rate increase or obtainment of funding for vulnerable communities.

E-1e Continue to partner with MCE to build capacity to support San Ramon’s clean community power goals and conduct educational campaigns, including tabling at community events, establishing informational resources on the City's website, regularly posting on social media, and developing energy bill inserts to highlight the benefits of 100% renewable energy, promote the available incentives, and promote MCE’s Flex Market Programs as a cost savings strategy. Include targeted outreach to convert Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) and direct access customers to MCE to decrease the community’s opt-out rate.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 2030: 14,213 MT CO2e
 2045: 0 MT CO2e
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Low Cost
 Community Cost: Low Cost
Co-Benefits
 Improved Public Health
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure E-2 are included in Table 13Table 13.

Table 13 Measure E-2 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
E-2a Adopt a single margin source energy score1 or more stringent ordinance by 2026 to reduce new residential and commercial natural gas construction. Include significant residential and commercial remodels in the ordinance by 2027.

E-2b Partner with MCE or PG&E to conduct an electrification infrastructure and capacity feasibility study to identify expected increases in electricity demand due to building and vehicle electrification and identify infrastructure improvements (including local renewable energy and storage projects) to increase capacity to meet demand. Include the potential role of distributed energy resources in the study as directed under Measure E-5.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Energy Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 41
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
E-2c Identify cost-effective strategies for how the ordinance and mitigation measure can facilitate both construction and on-bill cost savings and prevent energy utility bills increases for residents living on low and moderate incomes (e.g., incorporation of energy efficient requirements, smart electrical panel options, building management system options).

E-2d Host regular workforce development trainings for installers, local contractors, and building owners/operators to provide financial resources and technical resources on allelectric construction. Partner with community-based organizations to connect members of vulnerable communities to these training programs.

E-2e Conduct educational campaigns to educate building owners, developers, and the construction industry on the cost savings, environmental benefits, and versatility associated with all-electric construction, as well as the advantages all-electric construction provides for USGBC LEED certification. Utilize the cost-effective strategies as education materials and share the information on the City’s website, at City events, and at the City’s permit counter.

E-2f Partner with organizations such as the Building Decarbonization Coalition, MCE, BayREN, and USGBC to develop the ordinance and mitigation measures and educate the community on the benefits of all-electric construction.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 2030: 6,195 MT CO2e
 2045: 32,741 MT CO2e
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Low Cost
 Community Cost: No Cost/Cost Savings to Low Cost
Co-Benefits
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Improved Public Health
 Local Economic Opportunities
Notes:
1 A single margin source energy score ordinance is a local amendment to the building code that establishes a single metric to evaluate a building’s energy efficiency or GHG emissions. The single metric is established for buildings of all energy types to set a consistent standard for new construction.

Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure E-3 are included in Table 14Table 14.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
42 Table 14 Measure E-3 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
E-3a Adopt a reach code in 2026 requiring all new residential central air conditioning unit installations and replacements be two-way, providing both heating and cooling with a single unit for residential buildings.1 In doing so, the City will:
 Engage with interested parties in the building industry and residential sector, such as City staff, City officials, the Contra Costa Association of Realtors, Building Industry Association of the Bay Area, local developers, and local residents regarding the purpose and impact of the reach code.
 Conduct public hearings and public notices to facilitate community feedback on the draft ordinance and formally adopt the reach code.
 Submit the adopted reach code to the California Energy Commission and California Building Standards Commission.

Enforce reach code compliance through a comprehensive permitting compliance program which may include but is not limited to providing dedicated time for routine staff training and building inspections, imposing fees for noncompliance to offset staff costs and encourage voluntary compliance, establishing easy to understand web-based compliance checklists and permit applications, and facilitating online permitting.

Additionally, consider streamlining the permitting process for smart electrical panels and other electric load management technology.

E-3b Complete a residential existing building electrification feasibility analysis to determine the upfront and on-bill costs associated with building electrification strategies (including an assessment of residential building electrical panel capacities and potential upgrades needed) and draw on existing reach codes from similar jurisdictions to identify barriers to replacement and permit compliance (including equity barriers). Use this information to develop cost-effective strategies to include in the existing building electrification reach code (e.g., energy efficiency requirements, load management strategies) and develop projects and incentives for the building electrification resource center.

E-3c Partner with properties in San Ramon that provide deed-restricted affordable housing, MCE, PG&E, and BayREN to initiate and complete a low-income and affordable housing electrification pilot project. The project will implement energy efficiency strategies with electrification to mitigate increased energy bills for occupants. Promote the pilot project as a case study for future projects in the community.

E-3d Partner with MCE and PG&E to review residential incentives and rebates for procedural equity (e.g., complex application processes, credit checks) and develop a process so that existing and updated incentive programs continue to be equitably distributed to the community. Hurdles to equitable implementation could include credit checks, excessive procedural roadblocks, and lack of targeted outreach.

E-3e Conduct education campaigns to educate homeowners on the public health and environmental benefits of electrification, cost-effective strategies for electrification, available resources provided by the building electrification resource center, and the upcoming requirements of BAAQMD Air District Rules 9-4 and 9-6 for furnaces and water heaters. The campaign may include hosting regular events, such as an electrification fair, in partnership with community-based organizations like 350 Contra Costa Action to educate community members on available electric technologies, resources, incentives/rebates, and contractors.

E-3f Partner with Contra Costa County and MCE to create a building electrification resource center to provide residents information about electrification consultants and assessments, turn-key installations by pre-approved contractors, low up-front costs and on-bill financing, and equipment and labor warranties. As part of the building electrification resource center, provide free electrification assessments to rental and multi-family properties, as well as seniors and residents living on low and moderate incomes.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Energy Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 43
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 2030: 11,255 MT CO2e
 2045: 49,490 MT CO2e
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Moderate Cost
 Community Cost: Moderate Cost
Co-Benefits
 Community Resilience and Safety
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Improved Public Health
 Local Economic Opportunities
Notes:
1 Appliances that meet the requirements of this reach code include but are not limited to heat pumps.

Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure E-4 are included in Table 15Table 15.

Table 15 Measure E-4 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
E-4a Adopt a reach code in 2026 requiring all commercial central air conditioning unit new installations and replacements be two-way, providing both heating and cooling with a single unit for nonresidential buildings.1 In doing so the City will:
 Engage with interested parties in the building industry and commercial sector, such as City staff, City officials, the Contra Costa Association of Realtors, Building Industry Association of the Bay Area, local developers, and local businesses regarding the purpose and impact of the reach code.
 Conduct public hearings and public notices to facilitate community feedback on the draft reach code and formally adopt the reach code.
 Submit the adopted reach code to the California Energy Commission and California Building Standards Commission.

Enforce and track reach code compliance through the same permit tracking program developed for residential building electrification.

E-4b Develop monitoring and assessment protocols to track costs and benefits associated with commercial building electrification and adjust policies as needed.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
44 Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
E-4c Partner with MCE and PG&E to review incentives and rebates for procedural equity and develop a process so that existing and updated incentive programs continue to be equitably distributed to the community. Hurdles to equitable implementation could include credit checks, excessive procedural roadblocks, and lack of targeted outreach.

E-4d Work with MCE, PG&E, and BayREN to incentivize all-electric retrofits by combining rebate programs and financing mechanisms to create cost-effective electrification packages and develop bulk-purchasing opportunities for multi-unit development owners.

Prioritize small, and frontline community-owned businesses in distribution. Additionally, work with the organizations to publicize commercial tax breaks to highly efficient netzero energy building owners.

E-4e Conduct targeted outreach and complete tailored campaigns during development of the reach code to identify potential barriers to commercial electrification (including equity barriers) and educate commercial property owners on the benefits of electrification and cost-effective strategies (e.g., energy efficiency and optimization upgrades to allow for the downsizing of electrical infrastructure and appliances). Include targeted outreach to small businesses and minority-owned businesses.

Additionally, include education on the requirements of BAAQMD Air District Rules 9-4 and 9-6 for furnaces and water heaters.

E-4f Partner with the Bay Area Council and the San Ramon Chamber of Commerce to inform, encourage and facilitate electrification for commercial business owners.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 2030: 853 MT CO2e
 2045: 13,634 MT CO2e
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Low Cost
 Community Cost: Moderate Cost
Co-Benefits
 Community Resilience and Safety
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Improved Public Health
 Local Economic Opportunities
Notes:
1 Appliances that meet the requirements of this reach code include but are not limited to heat pumps.

Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure E-5 are included in Table 16Table 16.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Energy Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 45
Table 16 Measure E-5 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
E-5a Streamline the permitting process for battery storage systems in residential and commercial buildings.

E-5b Consider adopting a solar ordinance requiring newly constructed and majorly renovated multi-family and commercial buildings install solar systems and storage that meet the minimum requirements of Tier 2 Voluntary Standards under CalGreen and engage the commercial sector and Homeowner Associations to identify ways the City can support commercial energy storage installations and neighborhood-scale microgrid opportunities.

Additionally, include the role of distributed energy resources, including rooftop solar and battery storage systems, into Measure E-2’s feasibility study.

E-5c Partner with community-based organizations such as GRID Alternatives to connect residents living on low incomes to solar energy via the California Solar Initiative’s Singlefamily Affordable Solar Homes (SASH) Program and the Low-Income Weatherization Program (LIWP).

E-5d Connect home and business owners to incentives for renewable energy and storage including Net Metering Programs through PG&E for bill credits, the federal investment tax credit, and the California Public Utilities Commission’s (CPUC) Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP) and Equity Resilience rebates that provide an upfront rebate for battery storage.

E-5e Conduct an educational campaign that promotes the installation of storage technology in concert with renewable energy infrastructure through multilingual education programs, outreach, and information provided via City platforms and community events. Include in the campaign
 Community spotlights highlighting interviews with San Ramon community members who pair installation of storage technology with renewable energy infrastructure.  Promotion of MCE’s credits for excess solar energy and use of stored solar energy during peak hours to save costs on utility bills.
 Education on the resilience and cost saving benefits of distributed energy resources, including their role in electrification.

Additionally, connect large commercial developers and large business property owners to workshops on the benefits of microgrids and energy resilience.

E-5f Collaborate with PG&E, MCE, Contra Costa College, and/or other regional and local community partners to support and incentivize local on-site energy generation and storage resources.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 Supportive Measure and Actions
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Low Cost
 Community Cost: Moderate Cost to High Cost
Co-Benefits:
 Community Resilience and Safety
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Improved Public Health
 Local Economic Opportunities

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
46 Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure E-6 are included in Table 17Table 17.

Table 17 Measure E-6 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
E-6a Establish an Equitable Electrification Working Group or dedicate City staff time to monitor the implementation of energy strategies for residents living on low and moderate incomes and vulnerable communities.

E-6b Conduct engagement and direct outreach to residents living on low and moderate incomes and vulnerable communities as part of the monitoring process.

E-6c Identify equity parameters to prioritize a neighborhood for a neighborhood electrification pilot project with MCE and PG&E. Secure resources and partnerships to complete the pilot by 2035.

E-6d Pursue budget allocations and funding to finance the monitoring, engagement, and education efforts for equitable electrification.

E-6e Partner with community-based organizations to educate residents living on low and moderate incomes and vulnerable communities on the public health benefits and potential cost impacts of electrification to empower such community members to actively engage in the ordinance development and implementation process.

E-6f Engage with PG&E to identify opportunities and funding for natural gas infrastructure pruning to reduce the chance of stranded assets, provide potential funding, and establish an efficient and equitable transition to carbon-neutral buildings.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 Supportive Measure and Actions
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Low Cost
 Community Cost: No Cost/Cost Savings
Co-Benefits
 Community Resilience and Safety
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Improved Public Health
 Local Economic Opportunities

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Transportation Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 47
6 Transportation Strategy

6.1 Context
Accounting for the largest portion of GHG emissions in San Ramon, transportation is a key factor for San Ramon’s efforts to address GHG emissions (Measure T-1 through T-9). San Ramon’s transportation approach recognizes the need to balance environmental responsibilities with the practical concerns of residents, businesses, and property owners. Rather than relying on sweeping mandates, San Ramon’s CAP focuses on measured and cost-effective transportation measures that maintain community character and support continued economic vitality (Measures T-1, T-4).

These transportation measures prioritize reducing VMT first—by improving active and public transportation—then shifting the remaining VMT to electric vehicles. VMT is a measure of the total miles driven by all vehicles within a specified region and timeframe, often used to gauge traffic levels and evaluate transportation policies. While in theory, full electrification of all vehicles in San Ramon could achieve zero emissions in the transportation sector without reducing VMT, the City recognizes that cars and roadways carry embodied emissions not accounted for in the inventory, over which the City has little control. Beyond decreasing GHG emissions, there are additional benefits associated with reducing VMT, such as alleviating traffic congestion, requiring less space for roads and parking, promoting local economic revitalization, and enhancing overall quality of life.

Reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled
A key element of reducing VMT is providing a range of mobility options without forcing radical shifts in lifestyle. The strategy emphasizes expanding and updating the City’s bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, as outlined in the Bicycle Master Plan and Walking District Master Plan (Measure T-1), at a manageable pace, as well as creating corridors that make it easier and safer for residents to choose walking or biking (Measure T-2).47,48 For instance, the City will consider converting existing roadways into active transportation corridors—which are “people only” passageways that provide safe and comfortable connections between key destinations for people to walk, roll, and bike–and enhancing regional connections such as the Iron Horse Trail (Measure T-2).49,50 By improving access to microtransit and coordinating with established regional transit providers like the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) as well as local agencies (Measure T-3), San Ramon can reduce VMT in ways that are convenient and attractive for the community. In addition, the CAP recognizes the importance of increasing affordable housing near transit-rich areas identified in the City’s Housing Element to help residents naturally shorten commutes, keep transportation costs down, and maintain a strong local economy (Measure T-4). Lastly, the CAP recognizes the importance of partnering with City’s employers to address the VMT from commuters into Bishop Ranch by expanding the City’s Transportation Demand Management (Measure T-8).
47 City of San Ramon (2018). Bicycle Master Plan. Accessed December 2024 at:
https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/departments_and_divisions/public_works/transportation/studies/bicycle_master_plan 48 City of San Ramon (2022). Walking District Master Plan. Accessed December 2024 at:
https://www.sanramon.ca.gov/our_city/departments_and_divisions/parks_community_services/walking_district_master_plan 49 Active transportation corridors can include lanes that are reserved for active transportation modes and neighborhood shortcuts that connect streets to parks, schools, and other streets, shortening trips for people traveling by active transportation modes. 50 Contra Costa County (2020). Iron Horse Corridor Active Transportation Study. Accessed December 2024 at:
https://www.contracosta.ca.gov/6886/Iron-Horse-Corridor-Active-Transportatio

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
48 Transportation Electrification
Electrification then plays a role in reducing the remaining emissions from San Ramon’s transportation sector. The CAP’s transportation electrification measures emphasize putting the right infrastructure and incentives in place so that the adoption of zero-emission vehicles becomes a sound, voluntary choice for community members. From supporting the transition of municipal and commercial fleets to zero-emission vehicles (Measures T-5 and T-7), to making it simpler and more affordable for residents to invest in cleaner vehicles (Measure T-6), San Ramon’s transportation strategies rely on encouraging market-based decisions rather than imposing top-down requirements.51 Decarbonizing off-road equipment, for example, is pursued through practical guidelines, thoughtful outreach, and partnerships that help property owners and businesses make incremental improvements (Measure T-9).

Ultimately, San Ramon’s transportation measures are designed to conserve resources, improve quality of life, and secure cost savings, while maintaining the City’s long-standing commitment to fiscal responsibility and community input. By relying on partnerships with regional agencies, local businesses, and community organizations—such as the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, MCE, PG&E, the BAAQMDAir District, and community-based groups (Measures T-3, T-6, T-9)—as well as maintaining a steady, measured pace of implementation, the City confirms that progress toward lower emissions remains compatible with preserving local values, ensuring economic stability, and protecting individual choices.

6.2 Transportation Measures and Actions Detail
Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure T-1 are included in Table 18Table 18. 51 Contra Costa Transportation Authority (2019). Contra Costa Electric Vehicle Readiness Blueprint. Accessed December 2024 at:
https://ccta.net/projects/contra-costa-electric-vehicle-ev-readiness-blueprint/

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Transportation Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 49
Table 18 Measure T-1 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
T-1a Implement the Bicycle Master Plan and Walking District Master Plan in accordance with the plans’ visions, objectives, and guidelines so that the City adds approximately 27 miles to the existing bicycle network by 2030 and implements 50% of the proposed improvements to the walking district by 2030.

Continually improve methods for engaging the community, monitoring progress, identifying barriers, and identifying new funding opportunities to update the plans every 5 years. Include the development of a reporting process for residents to identify streets and intersections where bikers and pedestrians feel unsafe or lack access. Additionally, in plan updates, consider including bicycle storage/parking infrastructure and facilities to charge electric micromobility devices.1
T-1b Establish a standard methodology for measuring walkability, bike-ability, and access to transit that incorporates metrics for the real estate sector. By 2026, set short- and long-term targets for each metric at the neighborhood-level.

T-1c Directly engage community members living on low and moderate incomes and those disconnected by interstates to identify barriers to active transportation, especially in connecting these communities to the downtown core and public transit. Review all bicycle and walking network projects for these barriers and update projects accordingly to vet and update active transportation12 projects to be deployed equitably across all San Ramon neighborhoods.

T-1d Work with local active transportation organizations like Bike East Bay to identify and pursue regional and state funding to implement the Bicycle Master Plan and Walking District Master Plan and leverage San Ramon’s participation on the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) - Southwest Area Transportation Planning Committee (SWAT) to pursue funding for regional VMT-reducing projects included on the Comprehensive Transportation Project List.

Additionally, consider adopting an ordinance requiring development projects to pay fees that will be dedicated to implementing active transportation projects citywide.

T-1e Partner with the school district (through Safe Routes to School), youth sports leagues, and regional organizations like Bike East Bay to educate the community on bicycle and pedestrian safety and the health and environmental benefits of active transportation.

T-1f Partner with community-based organizations to continually vet and identify safety issues and concerns related to new and existing bicycle and walking infrastructure to maximize the safety of and build confidence throughout the community in San Ramon's active transportation infrastructure.

Additionally, continue to use The League of American Cyclists’ resources, checklist, and tools to maintain San Ramon’s designation as a Bicycle Friendly Community Designation.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 2030: 600 MT CO2e
 2045: 2,254 MT CO2e
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: High Cost
 Community Cost: No Cost/Cost Savings to Low Cost
Co-Benefits
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Enhanced Community Character and Quality
 Improved Public Health
 Sustainable Land Use and Transportation Connection
Notes:
1 Micromobility devices are small, lightweight, personal vehicles used to travel short distances. They include devices such as e-bikes and e-scooters.
21 Active transportation refers to any form of human-powered transportation, such as walking or bicycling, that promotes physical activity and reduces reliance on motor vehicles.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
50 Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure T-2 are included in Table 19Table 19.

Table 19 Measure T-2 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
T-2a Convert 37 miles of vehicle roadways into active transportation corridors1 by 2045.

T-2b Conduct a comprehensive study to identify vehicle roadways to convert into active transportation corridors to inform updates to the Bicycle Master Plan and Walking District Master Plan with a goal of developing safe and reliable active transportation corridors between residential and commercial areas as well as between residential areas and schools. The study shall consider latent active transportation12 demand by commuting types (i.e., trips to/from work within the City, trips to/from school within the City, trips to/from downtown core within the City), GHG emission reduction potential, and potential economic benefits for local businesses and residential properties. The study shall also consider development of the Iron Horse Trail into an active transportation corridor as analyzed in the Contra Costa Iron Horse Trail Study.

T-2c Include equity metrics in the roadway study to increase equitable access (from residents living on low and moderate incomes and vulnerable communities) to the benefits of the active transportation corridors. Engage with community-based organizations in the development and assessment of these equity metrics.

T-2d Dedicate staff time to identify and pursue regional and state funding sources to conduct the study and implement the active transportation corridor conversions.

T-2e Host regular car-free community events (potentially coupled with large and regular community events like the Farmers’ Market) that periodically close streets to cars to demonstrate the livability benefits, recreational opportunities, business opportunities, and active transportation improvements of reclaiming roadways. Couple these events with Listening Sessions for the City to hear community concerns on active transportation, account for them, and provide information back out to the community.

Additionally, develop a public, interactive map (or promote the use of an existing map such as Google Maps’ Bicycle-friendly Routes Layer) to show existing and new bike routes within the City and indicate the infrastructure type (e.g., whether the lane is a protected bicycle lane or if it is a shared lane with vehicles). Promote new active transportation infrastructure via social media and highlight success stories of community members switching to active transportation modes due to corridor development.

T-2f Partner with transportation organizations such as the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to conduct the study, plan the conversion, and identify and pursue funding.

Partner with community-based organizations in the development and assessment of the equity metrics as well as the promotion of the car-free events and social media material.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Transportation Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 51
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 Supportive of Measure T-1
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Moderate Cost to High Cost
 Community Cost: No Cost/Cost Savings to Low Cost
Co-Benefits
 Community Resilience and Safety
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Enhanced Community Character and Quality
 Improved Public Health
 Sustainable Land Use and Transportation Connection
Notes:
1 Active transportation corridors are “people only” passageways that provide safe and comfortable connections between key destinations for people to walk, roll, and bike. They can include lanes that are reserved for active transportation modes and neighborhood shortcuts that connect streets to parks, schools, and other streets, shortening trips for people traveling by active transportation modes. transportation refers to any form of human-powered transportation, such as walking or bicycling, that promotes physical activity and reduces reliance on motor vehicles. 2 Active transportation refers to any form of human-powered transportation, such as walking or bicycling, that promotes physical activity and reduces reliance on motor vehicles.

Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure T-3 are included in Table 20Table 20.

Table 20 Measure T-3 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
T-3a Work with the Contra Costa Transportation authority (CCTA) to implement a networked, on-demand, and zero-emission micro-transit1 service in San Ramon that is connected to both the active transportation infrastructure and public transit system (including the Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station).

Additionally, work with new multi-family and commercial developers to encourage developments to include microtransit services or shuttles to connect residents and commuters to the active transportation and public transit system, where feasible.

T-3b Conduct a study to identify the routes (including those along Bollinger Road and Dougherty Canyon Road) and frequencies for a new microtransit service that will maximize equitable access to the Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station and minimize commuting to the station via single occupancy vehicles. Consider piloting the microtransit service to determine effective routes and frequencies to maximize use.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
52 Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
T-3c Directly engage community members living on low and moderate incomes to identify potential barriers to the potential use of the microtransit system (e.g., shuttle schedules vs. work schedules) and address the barriers in the route, frequency, and schedule design.

T-3d Pursue funding for the microtransit service through local programs such as PG&E’s EV Fleet program and state programs such as the Hybrid and Zero Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project.

T-3e Develop an ongoing educational campaign centered around the Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station to inform residents of the microtransit service routes and schedules and, if applicable to the service, partner with Google Transit to publicize service routes, stops, schedules, and real-time shuttle tracking on Google Maps.

T-3f Partner with CCTA and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to conduct the study, plan the conversion, and identify and pursue funding.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 2030: 3,191 MT CO2e
 2045: 4,904 MT CO2e
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Moderate Cost to High Cost
 Community Cost: No Cost/Cost Savings
Co-Benefits
 Community Resilience and Safety
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Enhanced Community Character and Quality
 Improved Public Health
 Sustainable Land Use and Transportation Connection
Notes:
1 Micro-transit is a flexible form of shared transportation, often using smaller vehicles and app-based scheduling, operating on-demand or along dynamic routes within a defined service area.

Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure T-4 are included in Table 21Table 21.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Transportation Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 53
Table 21 Measure T-4 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
T-4a Update local codes to streamline the approval process for affordable housing sites in higher density areas as established by the Housing Element.

T-4b Identify locations in the downtown core and other higher density, transit-rich areas for potential affordable housing development.

T-4c Conduct a general educational campaign to increase the community’s understanding of affordable housing and promote the positive impacts it has on the community.

T-4d Partner with the East Bay Housing Organizations to plan and advocate for affordable housing sites that are integrated into a robust active transportation and public transit network.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 Supportive of Measures T-1 and T-3
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Low Cost
 Community Cost: No Cost/Cost Savings
Co-Benefits
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Improved Public Health
 Local Economic Opportunities
 Sustainable Land Use and Transportation Connection

Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure T-5 are included in Table 22Table 22.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
54 Table 22 Measure T-5 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
T-5a Implement vehicle replacements in alignment with the Advanced Clean Fleets Regulation to electrify or otherwise decarbonize 100% of the municipal fleet by 2045 and install electric vehicle (EV) chargers/alternative fueling stations at City-owned properties to support this zero-emission fleet (including County Connection bus services at transit centers and mobility hubs1).

T-5b Develop a vehicle replacement plan to transition the municipal fleet to zero-emission vehicles (ZEV) and meet the requirements of the Advanced Clean Fleet Regulation.

Continuously monitor the availability of ZEV’s and evaluate their suitability as replacement vehicles (considering vehicle function, associated costs, vehicle right-sizing, and potential fuel and maintenance savings) to update and accelerate the vehicle replacement schedule.

Develop a municipal electric vehicle infrastructure plan to analyze the organization’s charging needs through 2045 and create a prioritized list of new chargers to be installed on City-owned properties.

T-5c Develop and implement a pricing plan to allow public use of some municipal EV charging stations that would allow revenue to be used for infrastructure projects, active transportation plans, or other equitable uses; set requirement that 100% of revenue from charging stations must directly benefit community members living on low moderate incomes and vulnerable communities.

T-5d Secure funding from state programs (such as the California Air Resources Board's Clean Vehicle Rebate Project and the Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Program) and federal sources (such as the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program and Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Grant Program) to increase procurement of ZEVs and installation of EV/ZEV charging/fueling infrastructure at municipal facilities. Additionally, explore opportunities for Low Carbon Fuel Standard credit generation from use of low carbon fuels/electricity for fleet vehicles. Additional funding and financing may be available from:
 PG&E’s EV Fleet Program
 BAAQMD Air District opportunities including Carl Moyer  Charging as a service (CaaS) providers
 Inflation Reduction Act vehicle tax credits (can be issued to Cities as direct payment starting in 2024).

T-5e Leverage municipal fleet electrification as a local case study for San Ramon commercial fleets. Promote the planning, contracting, funding, implementation process along with lessons learned through transparent and simple-to-reach outreach material. Distribute the materials to local businesses and publish on the City’s website.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 Supportive of Measures T-6 and T-7
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Low to Moderate Cost
 Community Cost: No Cost/Cost Savings
Co-Benefits
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Improved Public Health
Notes:
1 A mobility hub is a central or well-connected location where multiple forms of transportation—such as buses, trains, bike sharing, scooters, car sharing, and ridesharing—are brought together with supportive infrastructure and amenities (e.g., secure bike parking, charging stations, real-time travel information) to make travel more seamless, convenient, and efficient.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Transportation Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 55
Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure T-6 are included in Table 23Table 23.

Table 23 Measure T-6 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
T-6a Adopt an electric vehicle reach code by 2026 requiring new multifamily construction to install the minimum number of EV chargers based on Tier 2 CalGreen requirements (20% of total parking spaces).

Additionally, implement the Electric Vehicle Readiness Plan to install 700 additional public EV chargers in San Ramon by 2030.

T-6b Develop an Electric Vehicle Readiness Plan that establishes a strategy to equitably increase ZEV1 adoption and infrastructure in San Ramon. The plan shall include:
 Direct engagement with the community, including community members living on low and moderate incomes and members living in multi-family housing, to identify barriers to ZEV adoption and strategies to address them  A study to identify a prioritized list of locations for new ZEV infrastructure with particular consideration for locations that will increase the equitable distribution of chargers to community members living on low and moderate incomes and residents living in multi-family buildings
 Consistency with the Contra Costa Electric Vehicle Readiness Blueprint and the General Plan.

T-6c Work with stakeholders to develop a ZEV car-share pilot program to provide access to an affordable, zero-emission mobility option at affordable housing sites and select an affordable housing site to install EV charging infrastructure for a pilot project.

T-6d Work with BAAQMD the Air District to pursue ZEV grants and other funding mechanisms for all community members facing income-based barriers to purchasing a ZEV.

Additionally, work with organizations such as MCE and PG&E to incentivize electric vehicle charger installations (including at-home electric circuits, panel upgrades, and Level 2 chargers) through on-bill financing and rebates and encourage use of existing electric vehicle chargers through subsidies.

T-6e Educate residents on the availability of electric vehicle charger incentives/financing programs, the City’s permitting process, and MCE’s Residential EV Rate Plan to help community members charge during off-peak hours and save money on home charging.

Include targeted outreach to rental and multi-family property owners to distribute the information.

Additionally, partner with ZEV manufacturers and retailers to host an EV demonstration and outreach event to allow residents to test drive EVs, speak with EV owners about their driving experience, and speak with experts on the benefits of EVs, charging options, and steps to applying for EV rebates.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
56 Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
T-6f Work with local partners like BayREN, MCE, the County’s Charge Up Contra Costa program, and BAAQMD the Air District to coordinate and provide multilingual education and outreach to the community on available ZEV rebates for residents and public charger locations; and host the EV demonstration and outreach event.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 2030: 33,038 MT CO2e
 2045: 155,969 MT CO2e
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Moderate Cost
 Community Cost: Low Cost
Co-Benefits
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Improved Public Health
 Local Economic Opportunities
Notes:
1 Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEVs) are vehicles that produce no direct (tailpipe) emissions of pollutants or greenhouse gases, such as battery electric cars or hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.

Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure T-7 are included in Table 24Table 24.

Table 24 Measure T-7 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
T-7a Adopt an EV reach code by 2026 requiring new commercial construction install the minimum number of EV chargers based on Tier 2 CalGreen requirements (20% of total parking spaces).

T-7b Directly engage with delivery service providers operating in the community to understand ZEV1 capacity and identify gaps in ZEV charging/fueling infrastructure to maintain route efficiency.

Consider establishing licensing fees for commercial delivery vehicles (such as Amazon and UPS, or vehicles making online retail deliveries) to provide funding for commercial ZEV adoption and fueling/charging infrastructure and/or provide discounted licensing fees for delivery companies which utilize ZEVs.

T-7c Require 50% of the revenue from the potential licensing fees be directed towards active transportation projects and EV charging infrastructure to benefit community members living on low and moderate incomes.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Transportation Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 57
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
T-7d Work with MCE and PG&E to coordinate and promote available commercial ZEV rebates and funding for ZEV charging/fueling infrastructure (e.g., Communities In Charge program). Include direct outreach to small and minority-owned businesses and information on MCE’s Commercial EV Rate Plans for businesses to charge during off-peak hours.

T-7e Provide commercial fleet operators educational material on the environmental and financial benefits of a ZEV fleet (e.g., cost savings on maintenance of ZEVs, new revenue streams when opening charging to the public) and the technical steps and resources for transitioning to a ZEV fleet. Include material on the municipal fleet transition as a case study.

T-7f Partner with organizations such as the Rotary Club of San Ramon and San Ramon Chamber of Commerce to understand impacts of the licensing fee and conversion rates to help identify hurdles and maintain progress with the program while avoiding negative impacts to the local business community.

Additionally, implement public-private partnerships with local businesses to site ZEV charging/fueling infrastructure for commercial and public use across the community.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 2030: 9,478 MT CO2e
 2045: 42,335 MT CO2e
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Low Cost
 Community Cost: Low Cost to Moderate Cost
Co-Benefits
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Improved Public Health
 Local Economic Opportunities
Notes:
1 Zero Emissions Vehicles (ZEVs) are vehicles that produce no direct (tailpipe) emissions of pollutants or greenhouse gases, such as battery electric cars or hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.

Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure T-8 are included in Table 25Table 25.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
58 Table 25 Measure T-8 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
T-8a Expand the Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program for Bishop Ranch with policies designed to achieve a 1.6 Average Vehicle Ridership1 (AVR) among 30% of employers by 2030 and 60% by 2045 upon implementation. Establish procedures and a schedule to monitor implementation of the program and regularly update the program based on survey results and GHG emissions reduction progress.

T-8b Conduct annual AVR surveys of businesses in Bishop Ranch to determine weekday AVR and mode split, perceived barriers to alternative modes of transportation (modes other than single occupancy vehicles) and telecommuting, and interest in sustainable transportation amenities, infrastructure, and events/resources. Review the survey results and work directly with businesses to correct survey data, when necessary.

T-8c Direct TMD fee revenues towards expanding public transit and active transportation infrastructure for equitable access and employee rideshare subsidies for small and minority-owned businesses.

T-8d Consider imposing an annual tiered TDM fee for Bishop Ranch businesses based on progress towards the AVR goal (aka. increase the fee for businesses who do not achieve the AVR goal and decrease it for those who do) to fund the program.

T-8e Provide businesses education material to distribute to employees on available sustainable mode share subsidies, available public transit routes and frequencies, and the benefits of sustainable commutes. Host a Commuter Fair for Bishop Ranch and community events such as Bike to Work Day.

T-8f Partner with the San Ramon Transportation Demand Management Advisory Committee to develop and implement the TDM Program, conduct the AVR surveys, and educate businesses.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 Supportive Measure and Actions
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Low Cost to Moderate Cost
 Community Cost: Low Cost
Co-Benefits
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
Notes:
1 Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) is measure of how many people, on average, commute in a single vehicle. It is used to gauge the effectiveness of programs aimed at reducing solo driving.

Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure T-9 are included in Table 26Table 26.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Transportation Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 59
Table 26 Measure T-9 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
T-9a Develop small off-road engine (SORE)1 guidelines in alignment with CARB’s requirements to encourage that at time of replacement, small off-road equipment (e.g., leaf blowers, lawn mowers) be zero emission starting in 2024 and portable generators be zero emission by 2028.

Additionally, establish an electric lawn and garden equipment lending program to allow community members to test handheld and commercial-grade electric lawn and garden equipment.

T-9b Conduct an assessment of off-road equipment and vehicles in the community to identify fleets with high decarbonization2 potential, identify fleets that will require targeted support to decarbonize, and identify available electric/biofuel options for each equipment type. The assessment shall include direct outreach to fleet operators in the community.

T-9c Work with BAAQMD the Air District to review existing off-road replacement rebates for procedural equity and directly connect fleets requiring targeted support and fleets belonging to small and minority-owned businesses, and residents living on low and moderate incomes to the rebates.

T-9d Work with BAAQMD the Air District to identify additional opportunities for community members to obtain co-funding to replace their off-road equipment (e.g., Clean Off-Road Equipment Voucher Incentive Program [CORE]) and provide support for grant applications.

T-9e Develop a multi-lingual Off-road Equipment Replacement Outreach Campaign that provides information to contractors, residents, and fleet operators in the community on equivalent alternatives to fossil fuel-powered off-road equipment; public health, noise, and safety benefits of alternative equipment technology; and funding opportunities available.

T-9f Work with surrounding jurisdictions and BAAQMD the Air District to create an Off-road Equipment Replacement Program to work directly with fleets identified in the feasibility study to decarbonize their off-road equipment and vehicles. The program shall include free consultations with fleet operators to identify equivalent alternatives to fossil fuelpowered off-road equipment, direct support to obtain rebates and incentives, and connections to qualified local repair services to maintain the replaced equipment.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 2030: 4,840 MT CO2e
 2045: 10,082 MT CO2e
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Moderate Cost
 Community Cost: Low Cost to Moderate Cost
Co-Benefits
 Improved Public Health
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
Notes:
1 Refers to small, typically gas-powered engines under 25 horsepower, such as those used in lawn mowers, leaf blowers, and other landscaping or maintenance equipment.
2 Decarbonization is the process of reducing or eliminating carbon dioxide (and other greenhouse gases) from energy sources, industries, and operations, typically by transitioning to low- or zero-carbon technologies.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
60 7 Solid Waste Strategy

7.1 Context
Sustainable solid waste management is essential to fostering a healthy community. When organic waste is improperly managed and sent to landfills, it decays and emits methane, a potent GHG that accelerates climate change. By reducing organic waste sent to landfills and improving waste management practices, San Ramon not only advances its GHG reduction goals, but also harnesses the opportunity to leverage such waste as valuable resources for community members and the environment.

Adopted in 2016, SB 1383 requires jurisdictions to reduce the amount of organic waste sent to landfills by 75% by 2025, compared to 2014 levels. San Ramon recognizes the GHG benefits of complying with this regulation and plans to use education, direct outreach, and coordination with waste haulers to achieve this goal by 2030 (Measure W-1). Compliance with this goal is also connected to a sustainable food system. A large portion of landfilled organic waste is food waste—including unspoiled food. In fact, in California 2.5 billion meals worth of unspoiled food is disposed of annually.52 San Ramon recognizes these inefficiencies as well as the embodied GHG emissions in the food related to the energy and water used to produce, transport, process, and prepare food. For these reasons, San Ramon plans to focus on reducing food waste, connecting unspoiled food to communities in need, and educating residents on sustainable food choices (Measure W-2).

San Ramon also recognizes the connection between SB 1383’s landfilled organic waste reduction requirements and the bill’s compost procurement requirements. Once diverted from the landfill, organic waste becomes a valuable resource. Composting organic waste avoids the anaerobic conditions that generate methane, reducing GHG emissions and creating compost that can be used across the San Ramon community. San Ramon plans to establish a comprehensive community composting program that produces and procures high-quality compost, making it available for use at City parks, recreation areas, public schools, community gardens, and residential and commercial landscapes (Measure W-3). Applying compost on San Ramon lands helps manage runoff and control erosion, contributing to cleaner water systems, healthier soils, and greater resilience for San Ramon and the surrounding region.53
52 CalRecycle. Organic Materials Management. Accessed December 2024 at: https://calrecycle.ca.gov/organics/. 53 U.S. Environmental Protections Agency. Composting. Accessed December 2024 at: https://www.epa.gov/sustainable-managementfood/composting#:~:text=Composting%20is%20nature's%20way%20of,of%20EPA's%20Wasted%20Food%20Scale.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Solid Waste Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 61

7.2 Solid Waste Measures and Actions Detail
Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure W-1 are included in Table 27Table 27.

Table 27 Measure W-1 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
W-1a Review the City’s existing waste hauler franchise agreement(s) with Alameda County Industries (ACI) and amend as needed to include SB 1383 organic waste diversion compliance and include a new SB 1383 fee to provide a sustainable revenue source for a new full- or part-time City staff person to manage organic waste diversion programs. This role would include monitoring implementation of commercial organics collection programs, monitoring communitywide progress on SB 1383 diversion goals, and coordinating with the waste hauler on education and outreach programs. Additionally, consider including weight sensors for real-time collection monitoring in negotiations with waste haulers.

Additionally, install organic waste bins and signage at all existing waste stations at Cityowned buildings and facilities, as well as properties and parks, to reduce landfilled municipal waste 75% by 2030 and 90% by 2045.

W-1b Work with the waste hauler to conduct annual community and municipal waste audits to determine organic waste landfill and diversion rates and track community and municipal progress on SB 1383 compliance.

Consider opportunities and partnerships to divert organic waste for biofuel production.

W-1c Directly connect with property owners and property managers of rental and multi-family housing units to distribute kitchen food scrap pails directly to housing units. Track the number of pails distributed annually.

W-1d Devote City staff time to pursuing funding for organic waste diversion programs through CalRecycle.

W-1e Implement a comprehensive education program to educate residents, businesses, school children, municipal employees, commercial generators, and community organizations (e.g., Homeowner Associations) on the City’s organic waste diversion requirements, resources, and programs to reduce landfilled organic waste communitywide. Include education on proper waste sorting methods to residents and distribute information through a variety of methods including social media campaigns, multi-lingual and culturally appropriate materials, and City pop-ups at community events (e.g., Farmers’ Market).

Consider creating a community and youth ambassador program where the City partners with community-based organizations and schools to train residents and youth to educate their neighbors and classmates on organic waste diversion benefits and proper disposal methods.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
62 Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
W-1f Partner with ACI or other waste hauler and community-based organizations to develop and distribute education material (including multi-lingual inserts in residential billing), distribute the kitchen food pails, and leverage the SB 1383-compliant franchise agreement to pursue funding from CalRecycle.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 2030: 13,083 MT CO2e
 2045: 19,144 MT CO2e
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Moderate Cost
 Community Cost: Low Cost
Co-Benefits
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Environmental Quality and Ecosystem Services
 Enhanced Community Character and Quality
Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure W-2 in Table 28Table 28.

Table 28 Measure W-2 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
W-2a Continue to enforce the SB 1383 Checklist to support Tier 1 and Tier 2 edible food generators in diverting 20% of edible food from the landfill and to food insecure community members.

Develop and adopt an ordinance to reduce food system waste through requirements vetted by the community (i.e., edible food generators) such as requirements for compostable food ware or a ban on single-use plastic food packaging.

Develop a City policy encouraging or requiring City-funded food purchases (for events, meetings, etc.) to follow climate-friendly guidelines (e.g., less or no meat/dairy/animal products, more locally/California- produced fruits, vegetables, nuts, etc.).

W-2b Partner with Contra Costa County or the Solano Food Bank to conduct an annual assessment of food insecurity and access to food recovery organizations and services in the community. Engage community members in the assessment to identify barriers that food insecure and vulnerable populations face in accessing food recovery organizations and services. Develop City partnerships, requirements, and funding opportunities to address these barriers.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Solid Waste Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 63
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
W-2c Assist small and low-income edible food generators in identifying and applying to available grant programs to help them train employees on organic waste diversion and acquire necessary organic waste infrastructure and signage via direct outreach.

W-2d Develop multi-lingual and culturally appropriate educational campaigns on the environmental and health benefits of climate-friendly diets. Include regular interactive community pop-ups (such as plant-based cooking demonstrations and water-wise gardening or gardening with carbon farming techniques) at community events (e.g., Farmers’ Markets), public schools, and community gardens.

W-2e Partner with Contra Costa County, edible food generators, schools, and nonprofits such as the East Contra Costa Community Alliance to collaborate on assessments, funding, and educational campaigns.

Additionally, establish partnerships with technology companies developing innovative ways to connect community members to edible food waste from Tier 1 and Tier 2 generators (e.g., Too Good to Go) and ways to optimize such technology for food insecure community members.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 Supportive Measure and Actions
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Low Cost
 Community Cost: Low Cost to Moderate Cost
Co-Benefits
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Enhanced Community Character and Quality
 Improved Public Health
Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure W-3 in Table 29Table 29.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
64 Table 29 Measure W-3 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
W-3a Establish a program to procure and provide organic waste products to City parks, recreation areas, public schools, community gardens, and residential and commercial landscapers within San Ramon and regional partners such as East Bay Parks.

Require City departments to apply compost to the exterior of suitable facilities and open spaces as part of their operations.

W-3b Complete an analysis to identify locations within the community to apply compost to meet the procurement target and increase carbon sequestration.

Additionally, assess the feasibility of partnering with ACI to establish a local compost facility to compost San Ramon’s organic waste to close the loop for organic material within the community.

W-3c Through the composting program, provide free compost to residents living on low and moderate incomes and low-income and minority-owned landscaping businesses.

W-3d Utilize CalRecycle grant funding to support the procurement and application of compost through the communitywide composting program.

W-3e Using established education materials from StopWaste and other organizations, provide outreach and education to the City’s community gardens, residential groups, and landscapers on the benefits of using organic end products such as compost and mulch.

W-3f Partners with Contra Costa County, the community’s waste hauler(s), local nonprofits, and regional partners such as East Bay Parks to develop the composting program, conduct educational campaigns, and identify opportunities for regional collaboration.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 2030: 1,791 MT CO2e
 2045: 2,080 MT CO2e
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Moderate Cost
 Community Cost: No Cost/Cost Savings
Co-Benefits
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Environmental Quality and Ecosystem Services
 Enhanced Community Character and Quality
 Improved Public Health

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Water and Wastewater Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 65
8 Water and Wastewater Strategy

8.1 Context
Water and wastewater infrastructure can be managed to reduce the energy needed to treat and transport water and wastewater, and the associated GHG emissions. Residential and commercial buildings use water both indoors for cooking, cleaning, bathing, and toilet flushing, and outdoors to irrigate landscaping and maintain pools and fountains. Water efficiency measures not only reduce the amount of water used but also reduce the amount of energy needed to convey, treat, and distribute such water. Additionally, water consumption and wastewater generation are interconnected, therefore water conservation efforts will lead to decreases in wastewater generated, as less water is treated through the wastewater system.

In response to frequent drought cycles and growing concern for water resource reliability, the City of San Ramon is working to strengthen its water and wastewater infrastructure. Through close coordination with the Dublin San Ramon Services District (DSRSD) and the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD), San Ramon’s CAP water and wastewater measures seek to use recycled water, upgrade critical infrastructure, and educate residents and businesses on best practices in water conservation. By addressing both water supply and demand, these measures not only safeguard local water resources but also help reduce GHG emissions linked to pumping and treatment processes.

Although water- and wastewater-related GHG emissions make up a small portion of San Ramon’s overall inventory, they remain a strategic focus for building community resilience and sustainability.

The CAP’s water and wastewater measures focus on reducing indirect electricity usage from water use and wastewater generation and do not directly address wastewater process emissions. By prioritizing recycled water investments, adopting efficient water use technologies, and engaging the community through targeted outreach, San Ramon’s water and wastewater strategy aims to reduce both environmental impacts and costs. Together, these efforts will help San Ramon’s water infrastructure remain robust, adaptable, and capable of meeting local demands—both now and in the future.

8.2 Water and Wastewater Measures and Actions
Detail
Actions, co-benefits, City costs, community costs, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure WW-1 are included in Table 30Table 30.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
66 Table 30 Measure WW-1 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
WW-1a Support efforts by DSRSD and EBMUD to prioritize investments in strategies and projects to expand recycled water supply and increase purple pipe infrastructure in the community and for Bishop Ranch.

WW-1b Support DSRSD and EBMUD in conducting a feasibility study to identify opportunities to increase local recycled water supply (e.g., use of groundwater, inclusion of tertiary treated wastewater effluent) to supplement existing potable water supply and opportunities to expand purple pipe infrastructure (including analysis of specific projects that could switch from potable to recycled water with access to infrastructure).

WW-1c Work with DSRSD and EBMUD to evaluate potential impacts to cost of water service, identify ways to maintain or decrease costs of service, and identify ways to offset potential bill increases through non-discounted customers or grant funding for community members facing high utility bill burdens.

Additionally, work with EBMUD to promote their Customer Assistance Program to lower water bills for qualified residents living on low incomes.

WW-1d Dedicate City staff time to collaborating with DSRSD and EBMUD and pursuing funding from state and federal sources such as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Clean Water State Revolving Fund, and US Bureau of Reclamation's WaterSMART grants.

WW-1e Coordinate with DSRSD, EBMUD, and community-based organizations to implement a public education campaign that promotes and provides demonstrations of graywater and rainwater systems and information on available incentives for residential installation, with a focus on community members with high utility bill burdens. Include promotion of the environmental and cost saving benefits of recycled water.

WW-1f Partner with community-based organizations to understand community barriers to adopting use of recycled water.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 Supportive Measure and Actions
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Low Cost
 Community Cost: Low Cost
Co-Benefits
 Community Resilience and Safety
 Environmental Quality and Ecosystem Services
 Local Economic Opportunities
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Enhanced Community Character and Quality

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Water and Wastewater Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 67
Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure WW-2 are included in Table 31Table 31.

Table 31 Measure WW-2 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
WW-2a Continue enforcing the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance for new and renovated landscapes and enforcing requirements for all new construction/developments to use water-efficient fixtures and water-efficient irrigation systems.

WW-2b Perform analysis to understand the feasibility and potential potable water savings of adopting a Dual Drainage Plumbing Ordinance to require new construction be dual plumbed for potable and recycled water systems for toilet flushing. Additionally, analyze the feasibility and benefits of including additional uses for recycled water under the ordinance and including requirements for rainwater harvesting.

Additionally, engage with DSRSD and EBMUD to understand the feasibility of and advocate for public-facing software that allows customers to check real-time water consumption data and explore water conservation recommendations and incentives based on their water consumption history.

WW-2c Review DSRSD’s and EBMUD’s water conservation incentives and rebates for procedural equity and provide targeted outreach to residents and businesses facing utility bill burdens to promote available funding opportunities.

WW-2d Continue to partner with DSRSD and EBMUD to provide water conservation rebates and accessible, easy-to-use portals for customers to track water usage in real-time and identify actions to reduce water bills.

WW-2e Implement a coordinated educational campaign targeted at homeowners, rental and multi-family property owners, schools, and businesses to promote the environmental and financial benefits of water conservation, strategies to conserve water (including efficient fixtures, appliances, and irrigation systems; leak detection strategies; and water-wise landscaping including compost application), and available incentives and rebates from DSRSD and EBMUD. Promote the information by distributing infographics with the information and QR codes to relevant resources to residents and businesses, including information on utility bills, hosting community events such as the Water Conservation Showcase, and including the information with links to relevant sources on the City’s website. Include community spotlights to share community members’ success stories and school children’s projects on water saving initiatives.

Additionally, create a San Ramon Green Business Program to connect small- and mediumsized San Ramon businesses with technical assistance and incentives for water use reduction (along with commuting, energy, and waste initiatives) and recognize and promote businesses for their green accomplishments.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
68 Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
WW-2f Partner with community-based organizations, DSRSD, and EBMUD to develop and implement the educational campaign.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 Supportive Measure and Actions
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Moderate Cost
 Community Cost: Low Cost
Co-Benefits
 Community Resilience and Safety
 Environmental Quality and Ecosystem Services
 Local Economic Opportunities
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Enhanced Community Character and Quality

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Implementation by City Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 69
9 Implementation by City Strategy

9.1 Context
Translating climate goals into tangible results requires two vital components: an engaged community and a well-equipped governance system to guide implementation. The Implementation by City Strategy is designed to provide both of these components. Through Measures IMP-1 and IMP-2, San Ramon outlines a multifaceted approach that both mobilizes the community and outlines the role of the City through staffing, subject matter expertise, and resources needed for lasting success. IMP-1 focuses on educating and engaging San Ramon’s youth, highlighting interactive events, resourcesharing partnerships, and accessible lesson plans that support the community’s existing needs and future goals. This measure enables San Ramon to develop an ongoing community feedback loop to receive feedback from the community and adjust the CAP implementation or measures and actions as necessary. Measure IMP-2 builds on this foundation by creating staff positions dedicated to sustainability, establishing formal coordination channels among City departments, and offering transparent reporting to San Ramon residents and businesses.

By emphasizing both youth engagement and a robust civic infrastructure, San Ramon’s CAP helps prepare San Ramon to adapt to emerging challenges, capture new opportunities, and remain accountable to its 2030 and 2045 GHG emissions reduction targets. The following tables outline the specific actions under Measures IMP-1 and IMP-2, illustrating how San Ramon will transform climate commitments into lasting, measurable outcomes.

9.2 Implementation by City Measures and Actions
Detail
Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure IMP-1 are included in Table 32Table 32.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
70 Table 32 Measure IMP-1 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
IMP-1a Establish a Climate Change Education Working Group focused on convening local and regional climate experts and organizations to develop climate change resources for educators (e.g., example lesson plans) for the San Ramon Valley Unified School District and host regular youth events on climate action.

IMP-1b Conduct an informal survey of San Ramon Valley Unified School District educators to gauge interest and existing comfort-level with educating students on climate change and equity to inform the Working Group’s efforts and inform the development of support resources/programs for educators.

IMP-1c Incorporate environmental justice and equity (local and global) into the resources and youth events, utilizing existing resources including the California Coastal Commission’s Environmental Justice Resources for Educators and Students.

IMP-1d Work with BAAQMD the Air District to pursue funding for youth outreach programs such as Safe Routes to Schools and Spare the Air Youth.

IMP-1e Host interactive youth events outside of the classroom focused on helping youth envision a carbon neutral future such as workdays on organic farms practicing carbon farming, a Climate Jobs Fair, and an annual showcase where students can present climate project ideas and implementation to the community and City leaders.

Additionally, encourage schools and youth groups to join the Cleaner Contra Costa Challenge to empower youth to help their families reduce their emissions through personal choices.

IMP-1f Work with local educators, youth leaders, and community-based organizations to develop and implement the resources and youth events.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 Supportive measure and actions
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Low Cost
 Community Cost: No Cost/Cost Savings to Low Cost
Co-Benefits
 Cost Savings and Consumer Benefits
 Enhanced Community Character and Quality
 Environmental Quality and Ecosystem Services

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Implementation by City Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 71
Actions, key pillars, co-benefits, and specific quantitative GHG emissions reductions associated with implementation of Measure IMP-2 are included in Table 33Table 33.

Table 33 Measure IMP-2 Actions
Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
IMP-2a Create a full-time sustainability position(s) to oversee the implementation of the Climate Action Plan and sustainable initiatives at the City. This staff member(s) would serve as a key organizer for cross-departmental collaboration needed to implement climate action plan goals, the point person for public/community contact, and a key researcher for emerging technologies, sources of funding, and best practices in climate action.

Additionally, identify a Sustainability Coordinator from each of the City’s main departments (e.g., City Manager, Community Development, Parks & Community, and Public Works) and applicable divisions to convene in quarterly sustainability peer-to-peer information sharing summits to discuss challenges, brainstorm solutions, and track progress towards reaching the City’s climate and sustainability Key Performance Indicators.

Lastly, based on regular monitoring and the continued community feedback loop, update the CAP every four to eight years in alignment with General Plan 2040 Policy 12.9-I-3.

IMP-2b Conduct an annual survey of existing staff interest in leading sustainability initiatives to identify and reward internal champions.

Additionally, throughout the CAP implementation, hold regular community events and conduct continued community engagement to inform community members (i.e., residents, businesses, and school children) of the City’s CAP implementation and progress towards the City’s 2030 and 2045 GHG targets; and receive continued feedback on the implementation and future CAP updates.

IMP-2c Host annual workshops to train staff and build internal capacity to prioritize equity in the City’s climate action planning, monitoring, and implementation. Model the workshops around California’s Capitol Collaborative on Race & Equity and include discussion and analysis of San Ramon-specific examples of best practices and lessons learned.

Additionally, identify underserved groups in the community to reach via direct outreach during the CAP implementation and update process.

Lastly, for all outreach events and educational material related to the CAP, translate the material into the top non-English languages spoken in San Ramon and format the material for accessibility.

IMP-2d Identify and apply for sustainability staffing assistance through fellowship and internship programs including the Climate Corps Fellowship, Diablo Valley College, and CivicSpark to increase internal staff capacity for climate action and bring in innovative ideas.

Additionally, designate staff time and municipal funds to hold regular community events and continue community engagement on the CAP implementation and future CAP updates.

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) City of San Ramon
San Ramon Climate Action Plan
72 Action ID Action Description Key Pillars
IMP-2e Encourage and provide funding for City staff to attend and present at local and virtual events, conferences, and trainings dedicated to climate and sustainability topics including building decarbonization, fleet electrification, environmental justice, sustainable food systems, and climate resilience. Structure such efforts around the importance of establishing strong systems to share key findings and institute best practices in internal operations.

Additionally, create and regularly update a climate dashboard to display the City’s progress towards 2030 and 2045 targets and progress on CAP implementation.

IMP-2f Build and maintain partnerships with community-based organizations to partner with on outreach events and community engagement to reach more community members in the implementation and future CAP update process. Maintain an active partnership database internally and list active partners with contact information on the climate dashboard.

Total GHG Emissions Reduction from Measure
 Supportive measure and actions
Cost Categorization
 City Cost: Moderate Cost
 Community Cost: No Cost/Cost Savings
Co-Benefits
 Community Resilience and Safety
 Environmental Quality and Ecosystem Services
 Local Economic Opportunities

9.1.a
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: A: San Ramon Climate Action Plan (CAP), June 10, 2025 (2025-073 : Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update) Nature-based Carbon Sequestration Strategy
Final Draft Climate Action Plan 73
10 Nature-based Carbon Sequestration
Strategy

10.1 Context
San Ramon’s pathway to a lower-carbon future includes leveraging natural spaces to capture and sequester carbon from the atmosphere. Parks, open spaces, and tree-lined streetscapes offer an opportunity to enhance carbon sequestration while delivering an array of co-benefits, from improved public health to environmental quality and community character. Consistent with California’s carbon neutrality goal codified in AB 1279, San Ramon’s climate strategy incorporates the requirement to achieve at least an 85 percent reduction in anthropogenic GHG emissions below 1990 levels by 2045.

The remaining 15 percent of emissions—those that are most challenging to eliminate directly—will need to be addressed through carbon sequestration and removal strategies. By prioritizing naturebased solutions, San Ramon not only supports its broader emissions reduction efforts in sectors such as energy, transportation, and solid waste but also aligns with AB 1279’s vision for a balanced approach to achieving statewide net-zero and net-negative emissions.

Carbon Sequestration
San Ramon aims to expand and maintain its urban forest, promote restorative landscaping practices, and establish programs that boost nature-based carbon sequestration (Measure CS-1). By protecting existing trees, planting new ones in areas with below-average canopy coverage, and focusing on populations most vulnerable to extreme heat, San Ramon will not only store more carbon but also mitigate urban heat island effect, bolster stormwater management, and improve overall community health and livability.54,55,56 Central to these efforts is the development of an Urban Forest Management Plan, which will set goals for tree canopy coverage, outline maintenance and preservation strategies, and guide future investments in tree planting and landscaping.

In addition, San Ramon plans to partner with local nurseries, arborists, community-based organizations, and nonprofits to conduct tree-planting events and educational programs. These community-driven initiatives will help foster a sense of stewardship, elevate awareness of the many benefits trees provide, and provide proper care and maintenance of newly planted trees. Over time, the City’s Tree Preservation and Protection ordinance and associated Tree Mitigation Fund,57 a proposed Tree Trust or Endowment, and potential grant funding from state and federal sources will help sustain and expand these nature-based efforts.
54 Ettinger, A.K., Bratman, G.N., Carey, M. et al. (2024). Street trees provide an opportunity to mitigate urban heat and reduce risk of high heat exposure. Sci Rep 14, 3266. Accessed December 2024 at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51921-y 55 Swann, Chris (2017). Review of the Available Literature and Data on the Runoff and Pollutant Removal Capabilities of Urban Trees.

San Ramon City CouncilJune 10, 2025

San Ramon City Council
June 10, 2025