Agenda, regular meeting — Sanger City Council, February 19, 2026 (part 1 of 2)

AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW 72 HOURS

PRIOR TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
AT THE SANGER LIBRARY, CITY CLERK’S OFFICE AND

THE SANGER CITY HALL
LOBBY.

AGENDA

SANGER CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
THURSDAY , FEBRUARY 19, 2026
6:00 PM

COUNCIL CHAMBER
1700 7TH Street, Sanger, California 93657
Levine Act Disclosure. P u r s u a n t t o t h e L e v i n e A c t ( G o v t C o d e S e c ti o n 8 4 3 0 8 ) , a n y p a r t y t o a p e r m i t , license, contract, or other entitlement before the City Council is required to disclose on the record any contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $ 500 made by the party or the party’s agents within the preceding 12 months to any City oﬃcial. Participants and agents are requested to make this disclosure as well.

The disclosure should be made when the agenda item is called and must include the name of the party, participant, or agent, and any other person making the contribution, the name of the recipient, the amount of the contribution, and the date the contribution was made. Council Members are also required to make such disclosures and recuse themselves.

Conflicts of Interest. Council Members are required to disclose conflicts of interests and recuse themselves.

Prior to action by the Council on any item on this agenda, the public may comment on that item.

A. CALL TO ORDER
B. OPENING CEREMONIES
Invocation
Flag Salute
Roll Call
C. AGENDA APPROVAL, ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS
D. P

UBLIC FORUM
(This portion of the meeting is reserved for members of the public who wish to address the Council on any matter not listed on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. Speakers shall address all comments to the Mayor and the Council as a body and not to any particular Council Member or member of the staff. Speakers are asked, but not required, to state their name and address. The Council is prohibited by law from taking action on items not on the agenda.)

Page 1 ends

City Council Agenda
February 19, 2026

Page 2 ends

E. CONSENT CALENDAR
(Matters listed under the consent calendar are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion and one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, a member of the audience or a Council Member may request an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and it will be considered separately.)

1. SUBJECT: Minutes of Regular Council Meeting and Special Meeting held on February 5, 2026.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve.

2. SUBJECT: Payroll for the month of January, including Direct Deposit Nos. 68711 through 69098, Payroll Check Nos. 60744 th rough 60782, and Beneﬁt Check Nos. 2182 through 2189.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve.

3. SUBJECT: Warrants, including Check Nos. 96331 through 96534, for the month of January 2026.

RECOMMENDATION: Informational Item.

4. SUBJECT: Fire Department Monthly Report-January 2026 RECOMMENDATION: Informational Item.

5. SUBJECT: Police Department Monthly Report-January 2026 RECOMMENDATION: Informational Item.

6. SUBJECT: Receipt of Update on Emergency Repairs at Wastewater Treatment Plant Pursuant to Resolution No. 2025-95 a nd Request to Continue Declaration of Emergency
RECO
MMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution 2026-11 continuing the Declaration of Emergency and receive the report from City Manager Regarding Emergency repairs at Wastewater Treatment Plant per Resolution No. 2026-04.

7. SUBJECT: Authorization for Out of State Travel – Water Operations Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize out of state travel for Water Operations Manager to attend the California Rural Water Association (CRWA) Education and Exhibitor Expo in South Lake Tahoe, Nevada from April 27 – 30, 2026.

8. SUBJECT: Water Valve Assessment Project
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Specialized Utility Services Program (SUSP) for the Water Valve Assessment Project in an amount not to exceed $95,000.

9. SUBJECT: Out of State Travel Request-FIRE
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the out of state travel and training for the Fire Department Fire Chief Paramedic Liaison Oﬃce and Fire Inspector to attend the ESO Training Academy and Wave Conference from April 6-10, 2026, in Austin Texas.

Page 2 ends

City Council Agenda
February 19, 2026

Page 3 ends

F. DEPARTMENT REPORTS

1. SUBJECT: Review and Acceptance of the City of Sanger – Industrial Pretreatment Program Local Limits Evaluation Report
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the City of Sanger - Industrial Pretreatment Program Local Limits Evaluation Report conducted by AM Consulting Engineers and authorize the Public Works Director or designee to submit the report and propose updated local limits to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for review and approval.

G. PUBLIC HEARING

1. SUBJECT: Initiation of Annexation of Real Property for Regional Storm Drain Facility – Property located on the South Side of North Avenue Between Indianola a
nd Bethel Avenues (APN 332-080-40).

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

a. Staﬀ Recommends that City Council a dopt Resolution 2026-12 to request the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission (Fresno LAFCO) to take proceedings for the Annexation of a planned Regional Storm Water Drain Facility and Associated Finding of Exemption Under Public Resources Code Section 21083.3 and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183.

b. Waive the full reading and introduce, by title only, Ordinance No. 2026-02 an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Sanger approving Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment No 2026 -01 for pre -annexation zoning from Fresno County’s AE-20 (Exclusive Agriculture) to the City’s RSC (Recreation, Schools, and Conservation) zone district for approximately 11.42 acres located on the south side of North Avenue between Indianola and Bethel Avenues (APN 332-080-40)

H. CITY MANAGER/STAFF COMMUNICATION

I. REPORTS AND MATTERS INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS (This portion of the meeting is reserved for the Mayor and Council Members (i) to make brief reports on boards, committees, and other public agencies, and at public events, (ii) to initiate new matters and to request updates, and to initiate new agenda items. Under this section, the Council may take action only on any items specifically agendized and which meet other requirements for action.)

Page 3 ends

City Council Agenda
February 19, 2026

Page 4 ends

J. ADJOURNMENT
I certify under the penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted in accordance with the applicable legal requirements. Dated this 13th Day of February 2026.

Lina Martinez, City Clerk

ADA COMPLIANCE AND REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS POLICY . The Council has adopted a Reasonable Accommodation Policy which is available on the City website at www.ci.sanger.ca.us or upon request by emailing the City Clerk at [email protected]. The Policy provides a procedure for receiving and resolving requests for accommodation to participate in this meeting. If you need assistance in order to attend this Council meeting or require auxiliary aids or services, e.g., hearing aids or signing services to make a presentation to the Council, please email the City Clerk or call by phone at (559) 876-6300 extension 1350 so such aids or services can be arranged. Accommodations should be requested as early as possible as additional time may be required in order to provide the requested accommodation.

TRANSLATION SERVICES. Translation services in Spanish will be provided upon request.

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF AGENDA DOCUMENTS. Writings related to the agenda are available at Sanger City Hall, 1700 7th Street, Sanger, CA 93657 and are posted online at www.ci.sanger.ca.us. Writings provided to a majority of the City Council within 72 hours of the meeting regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Oﬃce located at Sanger City Hall, 1700 7 th Street, Sanger, CA 93567 and will be posted online at www.ci.sanger.ca.us.

Page 4 ends

Minutes for Special Council Meeting
TH
URSDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 2026
5:00 PM

COUNCIL CHAMBER
1700 7TH Street, Sanger, California 93657
A. CAL

L TO ORDER
The
Special Meeting of the City Council was called to order at 5:11 PM.

B. RO

LL CALL
Pr
esent: Mayor Frank Gonzalez, Mayor Pro Tem Daniel Martinez, Council Member Esmeralda Hurtado, Council Member Michael Montelongo
Ab
sent: Council Member Dolores Melendez
AT
TENDANCE: Council Member Melendez arrived at 5:37 p.m.

C. AGE

NDA APPROVAL
The
Council by motion of Council Member Montelongo approved the agenda as posted. The motion was seconded by Council Member Hurtado, and approved by the following vote:

AYE
S: GONZALEZ, MARTINEZ, HURTADO, MONTELONGO
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: MELENDEZ
D. PUB

LIC FORUM - NONE
E. CL

OSED SESSION
Th
e Council adjourned to Closed Session at 5:12 pm.

1. Pur
suant to Government Code Section 54957.6

CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Agency designated representatives: Shelline Bennett, Lead Negotiator, Amanda Champion, HR Manager. Employee Organizations: Sanger General Employees Organization, Sanger Middle Management Organization,
Unrepresented/Confidential Employees and Executive Employees E-1

Page 5 ends

City Council Special Meeting Minutes
February 5, 2026

Page 2 ends

2. Conference with Legal Counsel – Pending Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1).

Case: Gardeazabal v. City of Sanger, Fresno County Superior Court Case No. 25CECG04536 (Bane Act, battery, and torts)

3. Conference with Legal Counsel – Anticipated Litigation Deciding whether to initiate litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)
Number of Cases: One case

The Council reconvened the Special Meeting at 6:17 pm.

F. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION

No reportable Action

G. ADJOURNMENT

Being no further business, the Council adjourned their Special Meeting at 6:17 pm.

ATTEST:

____
Amanda Champion, Deputy City Clerk

Page 6 ends

Minutes for Regular Council Meeting

THURSDAY , FEBRUARY 5, 2026
6:00 PM

COUNCIL CHAMBER
1700 7TH Street, Sanger, California 93657
A. CALL TO ORDER

The City Council called their meeting to order at 6:17 pm.

B. OPENING CEREMONIES

The invocation was oﬀered by Pastor Paul Canaday

The ﬂag salute was led by Mayor Frank Gonzalez.

Roll Call:

Present: Mayor Frank Gonzalez, Council Member Esmeralda Hurtado, Council Member Michael Montelongo, Council Member Dolores Melendez

Absent: None

C. AGENDA APPROVAL, ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS

The Council by motion of Council Member Michael Montelongo approved the agenda with the removal of Item G-14, subtopic (c), and Item H-2, to be held at a later date. The motion was seconded by Council Member Dolores Melendez and approved by the following vote:

AYES: GONZALEZ, MARTINEZ, HURTADO, MONTELONGO, MELENDEZ NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE

D. CEREMONIAL MATTERS
NONE

E. PRESENTATIONS-
• Sanger Fence-Austin Renteria
• Virginia Harmon-Investment Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2025

Page 7 ends

City Council Meeting Minutes
February 5, 2026

Page 2 ends

F. PUBLIC FORUM

Thirteen members of the public spoke

G. CONSENT CALENDAR

By motion of Council Member Montelongo, the Council approved all Consent Calendar Items with the exceptions of items G-3, G-6, G-8 & G-14. The motion was seconded by Council Member Melendez and passed by the following vote:

AYES: GONZALEZ, MARTINEZ, HURTADO, MONTELONGO, MELENDEZ NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE

1. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Minutes of Regular Council Meeting and Special Meeting held on January 15, 2026.

2. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Receipt of Update on Emergency Repairs at Wastewater Treatment Plant Pursuant to Resolution No. 2025 -95 and Request to Continue Declaration of Emergency.

4. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Transportation Development Act (TDA) Claim.

5. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Sanger and Sanger General Employees Organization.

7. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Declaration of City Vehicles as Surplus Property.

9. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Master Encroachment Agreements with Public Utility Providers.

10. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Accept Funds from the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Zero-Emission Landscaping Equipment Voucher Program.

11. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Sodium Hypochlorite Supply for City of Sanger.

12. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Water Main Easement Acceptance & Basin Covenant Approval Site Plan Review No. 25-08-Tractor Supply Center.

13. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Tract 6531 – Serenade II Subdivision Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2025-02 (ZOA 2025-02).

Page 8 ends

City Council Meeting Minutes
February 5, 2026

Page 3 ends

Item G-3 Pulled by Resident Rocha

3. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Authorization for Out of State Travel-Mayor Gonzalez.

Public Comment
None
The Council by motion of Mayor pro tem Martinez to approve item G-3. The motion was seconded by Council Member Melendez and approved by the following vote:

AYES: GONZALEZ, MARTINEZ, HURTADO, MONTELONGO, MELENDEZ NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE

Item G-6 Pulled by Resident Rocha

6. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Final Acceptance for Sanger Fire Station Remodel Project.

Public Comment
None
The Council by motion of Council Member Montelongo to approve item G-6. The motion was seconded by Mayor pro tem Martinez and approved by the following vote:

AYES: GONZALEZ, MARTINEZ, HURTADO, MONTELONGO, MELENDEZ NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE

Item G-8 Pulled by Council Member Hurtado

8. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Approval of Sole Source Agreement with Blue Voice, Inc. for Closed-Loop Artiﬁcial Intelligence Knowledge and Decision -Support Platform for Police and Fire Departments.

Public Comment
Two member of the public spoke
The Council by motion of Mayor pro tem Martinez to approve item G-8. The motion was seconded by Council Member Melendez and approved by the following vote:

AYES: GONZALEZ, MARTINEZ, HURTADO, MONTELONGO, MELENDEZ NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
ABSENT: NONE

Page 9 ends

City Council Meeting Minutes
February 5, 2026

Page 4 ends

Item G-14 Pulled by Resident Rocha

14. SUBJECT: APPROVED-Authorization of City Manager for direct contract administration for speciﬁed agreements, with the exception of Subtopic (c).

Public Comment
One member of the public spoke
The Council by motion of Council Member Montelongo to approve item G-14. The motion was seconded by Mayor pro tem Martinez and approved by the following vote:

AYES: GONZALEZ, MARTINEZ, MONTELONGO, MELENDEZ
NOES: NONE
ABSTAIN: HURTADO
ABSENT: NONE

H. DEPARTMENT REPORTS

1. SUBJECT: INFORMATIONAL ONLY -Investment Report for the quarter ended December 31, 2025

2. SUBJECT: PULLED FOR FUTURE DATE-Public Safety Sales Tax Gang/Drug Prevention/ Intervention Services Grant Program Awards

I. CITY MANAGER/STAFF COMMUNICATION

• Updates given by City Manager, Nathan Olson

J. REPORTS AND MATTERS INITIATED BY CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS

• Updates given by Mayor Pro Tem Martinez, Council Member Hurtado, Council Member Melendez, Council Member Montelongo and Mayor Gonzalez

K. ADJOURNMENT

Being no further business, the Council adjourned their meeting at 7:59 pm.

ATTEST:

Amanda Champion, Deputy City Clerk

Page 10 ends

Prepared by: Lina Martinez _ Approved by: Nathan Olson_________________

REVIEW: City Manager: _NCO_______ Finance: ___VH_____ City Attorney: ________ TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION X Consent
X Info Item
____ Action Item
____ Department Report
____ Redevelopment Agency

____ Public Hearing
____ Matter Initiated by a Council Member
____ Other
____ Continued to: __________

For the Meeting of: February 19, 2026
Agenda Item No: E-2

CITY OF SANGER

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

To: Mayor and City Council
From: Karla Camarena, Finance Manager
Subject: Approval of Payroll Checks- January 2026

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council approve the payroll for the month of January, including Direct Deposit Nos. 68711 through 69098, Payroll Check Nos. 60744 through 60782, and Benefit Check Nos. 2182 through 2189.

Page 11 ends

12/31/2025 City of Sanger 1:28PM
12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025- Type 1 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 1
Bank: dirdep - WEST

AMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check
Amt Direct Deposit
68711
1/2/2026 0.00 2,876.78CHAMPION, AMANDA
68712 1/2/2026 0.00 2,342.26DELGADO, SIERRA
68713 1/2/2026 0.00 2,301.60JACKSON, BRIONNE
68714 1/2/2026 0.00 1,917.03MARTINEZ, LINA
68715 1/2/2026 0.00 5,107.64OLSON, NATHAN
68716 1/2/2026 0.00 307.56GONZALEZ, FRANK G
68717 1/2/2026 0.00 312.56MARTINEZ, DANIEL
68718 1/2/2026 0.00 312.56MELENDEZ, DOLORES
68719 1/2/2026 0.00 312.56MONTELONGO, MICHAEL A
68720 1/2/2026 0.00 161.61HARPER, JESALYN
68721 1/2/2026 0.00 1,555.57BARRAGAN, CASIMIRO
68722 1/2/2026 0.00 1,709.01CUEVAS, ERIC
68723 1/2/2026 0.00 3,370.74GOGGINS, JOSHUA
68724 1/2/2026 0.00 1,737.82IRAZOQUI, MARIO
68725 1/2/2026 0.00 1,537.44MURPHY, ROSE
68726 1/2/2026 0.00 2,077.71SANDOVAL, PAUL
68727 1/2/2026 0.00 2,131.62TOVAR, CARLOS
68728 1/2/2026 0.00 584.42VIDRIO, JAVIER
68729 1/2/2026 0.00 3,532.34CAMARENA, KARLA D.
68730 1/2/2026 0.00 1,666.95CASILLAS-TORRES, SMALYNNE 68731 1/2/2026 0.00 1,292.30DE ORTA, MICHELLE
68732 1/2/2026 0.00 1,591.41FLORIAN, STEPHANIE
68733 1/2/2026 0.00 3,396.77HARMON, VIRGINIA
68734 1/2/2026 0.00 584.11NORIEGA, LESLIE
68735 1/2/2026 0.00 1,417.76PEREZ ZUNIGA, MAYRA E
68736 1/2/2026 0.00 1,356.02RAMIREZ, MICHELE
68737 1/2/2026 0.00 2,202.13WAHL, LEICA KATHRINA LACAY 68738 1/2/2026 0.00 2,542.88ALDAZ, MARCO
68739 1/2/2026 0.00 3,936.97ALONSO, JULIA
68740 1/2/2026 0.00 2,622.03CASTELLANOS, LINDSAY
68741 1/2/2026 0.00 4,244.10CORONADO JR, JESUS
68742 1/2/2026 0.00 1,473.42CUELLAR, ADRIANA
68743 1/2/2026 0.00 2,306.30DELGADILLO, ANGEL
68744 1/2/2026 0.00 3,071.08DOLAN, HAYDEN
68745 1/2/2026 0.00 2,758.25ELLIS, SKYLER
68746 1/2/2026 0.00 1,876.30ESCOBAR, MICHAEL
68747 1/2/2026 0.00 2,390.50HOULE, BAILEY
68748 1/2/2026 0.00 1,581.52JACKSON, COLBY
Page: 1

Page 12 ends

12/31/2025 City of Sanger 1:28PM
12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025- Type 1 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 2
Bank: dirdep - WEST

AMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check
Amt Direct Deposit
68749
1/2/2026 0.00 3,240.47JAECKEL, A
VA
68750 1/2/2026 0.00 6,331.14JONES, ANDY
68751 1/2/2026 0.00 2,341.25LANG, JUSTIN
68752 1/2/2026 0.00 4,977.51LORENTE, RYAN
68753 1/2/2026 0.00 2,651.73MCWILLIAMS, SOFIA
68754 1/2/2026 0.00 2,784.43MIRELES FLORES, MARIA
68755 1/2/2026 0.00 2,779.95PALLAS, MICHAEL L
68756 1/2/2026 0.00 2,493.10PISCHING, MARK G
68757 1/2/2026 0.00 5,770.80PITTS, CRAIG
68758 1/2/2026 0.00 2,351.92SALAZAR, GARRETT
68759 1/2/2026 0.00 671.14SPANGLE, JENNIFER
68760 1/2/2026 0.00 3,382.39TARASCOU, GREGORY
68761 1/2/2026 0.00 2,228.27TREVINO, SANDRA
68762 1/2/2026 0.00 3,307.16VELASQUEZ, SHERRY
68763 1/2/2026 0.00 6,628.83WADDLE, CHRISTOPHER A.
68764 1/2/2026 0.00 2,140.64WASHBURN, HAIDYN
68765 1/2/2026 0.00 4,857.39WILLIAMS, KENNETH D.
68766 1/2/2026 0.00 5,045.13WILSON, TODD
68767 1/2/2026 0.00 3,260.06ZEPEDA, LEONARDO
68768 1/2/2026 0.00 4,896.78ACEVES CRUZ, JULIAN
68769 1/2/2026 0.00 3,633.61ARGUELLO, SERGIO
68770 1/2/2026 0.00 1,828.56AYERS III, JOHN
68771 1/2/2026 0.00 2,342.28BANDA-TOVAR, JOEL
68772 1/2/2026 0.00 2,096.42BARRAGAN, MELISSA
68773 1/2/2026 0.00 1,847.74BERNAL, SADIE
68774 1/2/2026 0.00 3,414.93BISE, JEFFREY L.
68775 1/2/2026 0.00 3,556.18BOUST, JASON
68776 1/2/2026 0.00 1,899.07BURKDOLL, MARISA
68777 1/2/2026 0.00 1,233.17CAMPBELL, SARAH L
68778 1/2/2026 0.00 20,018.23CASTREJON, EDDIE
68779 1/2/2026 0.00 2,665.47DIAZ, HENRY
68780 1/2/2026 0.00 4,708.08EDWARDS, SHAELA
68781 1/2/2026 0.00 2,020.19FRANCO, RICHARD
68782 1/2/2026 0.00 2,158.86GARCIA, FERNANDO
68783 1/2/2026 0.00 4,799.83GARZA, RAMIRO
68784 1/2/2026 0.00 3,106.50GUILLEN, ROSARIO
68785 1/2/2026 0.00 1,591.63HERNANDEZ, ANDREINA
68786 1/2/2026 0.00 1,640.83HUGHES, TOBIAS
Page: 2

Page 13 ends

12/31/2025 City of Sanger 1:28PM
12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025- T
ype 1 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 3
Bank: dirdep - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
68787 1/2/2026 0.00 1,953.45INOSTROS, JESSICA
68788 1/2/2026 0.00 3,764.19JOHNSON, JOSHUA
D
68789 1/2/2026 0.00 2,233.06JONES, KIMBERLY M.
68790 1/2/2026 0.00 1,868.43KAUR, MANDEEP
68791 1/2/2026 0.00 7,342.23MEDINA, JOSE
68792 1/2/2026 0.00 2,482.15MENDEZ, GERARD
68793 1/2/2026 0.00 3,441.73MORALES, JESSE
68794 1/2/2026 0.00 4,261.92MORENO, LOUIS A
68795 1/2/2026 0.00 3,058.22MUNOZ, BERTHA J
68796 1/2/2026 0.00 3,172.87NELSON, AMANDA M
68797 1/2/2026 0.00 10,795.83PACHECO, JOSE
68798 1/2/2026 0.00 3,260.39REYNOLDS, JOHN
68799 1/2/2026 0.00 2,211.49ROARK, TYLER
68800 1/2/2026 0.00 4,674.24RODRIGUEZ, JULIAN R
68801 1/2/2026 0.00 1,587.44RYAN, NICOLE
68802 1/2/2026 0.00 3,379.69SANCHEZ, KELSEY
68803 1/2/2026 0.00 2,556.79SOTO, JOSE O.
68804 1/2/2026 0.00 4,020.13THAO, MENOU A
68805 1/2/2026 0.00 3,794.33TORRES, ROBERT C
68806 1/2/2026 0.00 2,107.28TREVINO, CYNTHIA
68807 1/2/2026 0.00 1,094.48VARELA, TERRI
68808 1/2/2026 0.00 1,871.35WELCH, PAUL M.
68809 1/2/2026 0.00 4,674.23YAMBUPAH, ANGELA C
68810 1/2/2026 0.00 2,190.68ACOSTA, JAVIER
68811 1/2/2026 0.00 1,357.59AVALOS, JORGE
68812 1/2/2026 0.00 2,280.64BARBA CORTES, ERIKA
68813 1/2/2026 0.00 1,297.24CABRERA, MARTIN
68814 1/2/2026 0.00 2,323.79CHOLICO, EDGAR
68815 1/2/2026 0.00 1,735.15EGGLESTON, STEVEN
68816 1/2/2026 0.00 2,378.45FLUETSCH, JOHN
68817 1/2/2026 0.00 3,122.95GONZALEZ, EDDIE
68818 1/2/2026 0.00 1,448.11GONZALEZ, JUAN
68819 1/2/2026 0.00 1,678.48HUERTA, PAUL
68820 1/2/2026 0.00 1,479.71IRAZOQUI, DANIEL T
68821 1/2/2026 0.00 2,819.72JASSO, GEORGE
68822 1/2/2026 0.00 1,907.33LOPEZ, ALEX
68823 1/2/2026 0.00 2,343.73LOPEZ, DIEGO
68824 1/2/2026 0.00 2,093.76MARTIN, RAYMOND
Page: 3

Page 14 ends

12/31/2025 City of Sanger 1:28PM
12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025- Type 1 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 4
Bank: dirdep - WEST

AMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check
Amt Direct Deposit
68825
1/2/2026 0.00 1,635.57MAZARIEGO, MANUEL
68826 1/2/2026 0.00 1,515.42ORONA, CAT
ARINO
68827 1/2/2026 0.00 1,271.07PIMENTEL, SEAN
68828 1/2/2026 0.00 2,165.46REYES, ANTONIO P
68829 1/2/2026 0.00 5,655.04ROSALES, ESPERANZA
68830 1/2/2026 0.00 1,559.20SANTOS, WILLIAM
68831 1/2/2026 0.00 1,899.55WOODS, STEVE
68832 1/2/2026 0.00 685.51HERNANDEZ, KEITH
68833 1/2/2026 0.00 576.95MENDOZA, GRICELDA
68834 1/2/2026 0.00 1,828.86ALBARRAN-PEREZ, VIANEY
68835 1/2/2026 0.00 186.96BARAJAS, LIZETTE
68836 1/2/2026 0.00 450.11DENISTON, CATALINA
68837 1/2/2026 0.00 277.72PETRILLE, BRIANA
68838 1/2/2026 0.00 23.21PINA, CARLOS
68839 1/2/2026 0.00 1,253.70VASQUEZ, APRIL
68840 1/2/2026 0.00 2,054.53ZAMORA, JOAQUIN

0.00 346,303.41Employee Check Totals

0.00 346,303.41Bank dirdep Totals (130 Forms)
Page: 4

Page 15 ends

12/31/2025 City of Sanger 1:28PM
12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025- Type 1 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 5
Bank: pybank - WEST

AMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check
Amt Direct Deposit
60744
1/2/2026 307.56 0.00HURT

ADO, ESMERALDA
60745 1/2/2026 161.61 0.00BOUASAVANH, CHAIDED
60746 1/2/2026 46.17 0.00AGUILAR, ANTONIO
60747 1/2/2026 161.61 0.00CARTER, KEVIN T
60748 1/2/2026 42.35 0.00ECHEVERRIA JR, VICTOR R
60749 1/2/2026 46.17 0.00LOPEZ, MARY LOU
60750 1/2/2026 2,869.92 0.00LITTLE, LYNDSEE
60751 1/2/2026 2,122.41 0.00WILHELM, AUBREE
60752 1/2/2026 13,742.69 0.00AYALA, RAMIRO
60753 1/2/2026 2,735.48 0.00PEREZ, SILVESTRE
60754 1/2/2026 1,267.49 0.00REYES, ALEJANDRO
60755 1/2/2026 669.86 0.00PRADO, BRANDON
24,173.32 0.00Employee Check Totals
Bank: pybank -

WESTAMERICA BANK
Benefit Checks
Check # Date Payee # Name Check
Amt Direct Deposit
60756
1/2/2026 98.86 0.00AFLAC
60757 1/2/2026 3,191.17 0.00AMERICAN FIDELITY

ASSURANCE
60758 1/2/2026 954.50 0.00SANGER FIRE ASSOCIATION, FOOD 60759 1/2/2026 2,798.87 0.00SANGER POLICE ASSOCIATION, DUE 60760 1/2/2026 1,201.52 0.00STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT
60761 1/2/2026 410.41 0.00STATIONARY ENGINEERS, LOCAL 39 8,655.33T
otal 0.00
8,655.33 0.00 Payee Totals
32,828.65 0.00Bank pybank Totals (18 Forms)
Page: 5

Page 16 ends

12/31/2025 City of Sanger 1:28PM
12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025- Type 1 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 6
Bank: wire -

FEDERAL T AX PAYMENT
Benefit Checks
Check # Date Payee # Name Check
Amt Direct Deposit
2182
1/2/2026 122,557.47 0.00WESTAMERICA
BANK
2183 1/2/2026 19,415.62 0.00EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 2184 1/2/2026 1,506.70 0.00I.C.M.A RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2185 1/2/2026 2,899.76 0.00CALPERS 457 PLAN
146,379.55T
otal 0.00
146,379.55 0.00 Payee Totals
146,379.55 0.00Bank wire Totals (4 Forms)
Grand T
otal 179,208.20 346,303.41
525,511.61Next Step:

Account Posting (AP)
Pay Period is Open (Locked)
Totals Checks and Direct Deposit (152 Forms)
Page: 6

Page 17 ends

12/31/2025 City of Sanger 1:28PM
12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025- T
ype 1 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 7
Check # Date Payee # Name Amount
Benefit Checks - pending for pay period from 12/27/25 to 01/09/26 ID: 1,183 1/16/2026 030 MID-MANAGEMENT

ASSN, DUES-MM
Source pay period: 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 Doc source: Bended code: Fund:midmgmtpay mmdues 101 1 14.22 ID: 1,182 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 midmgmtpay mmdues 261 19.50 ID: 1,182 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 midmgmtpay mmdues 61 1 20.52 ID: 1,182 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 midmgmtpay mmdues 621 21.26 ID: 1,182 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 midmgmtpay mmdues 712 39.00 ID: 1,182 Check T
otal: 214.50
1/16/2026 059 TEXAS LIFE INSURANCE COMP
ANY
Source pay period: 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 Doc source: Bended code: Fund:hlthpay txslfe 101 156.94 ID: 1,182 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 hlthpay txslfe 208 169.07 ID: 1,182 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 hlthpay txslfe 261 11.24 ID: 1,182 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 hlthpay txslfe 712 86.27 ID: 1,182 Check Total: 423.52
1/16/2026 041 GENERAL

EMPLOYEES ASSN, DUES GEN EMPS
Source pay period: 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 Doc source: Bended code: Fund:genemppay gendue 101 5.00 ID: 1,182 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 genemppay gendue 712 5.00 ID: 1,182 Check T
otal: 10.00
1/16/2026 008 SANGER FIRE

ASSOCIATION, DUES-FIRE
Source pay period: 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 Doc source: Bended code: Fund:firduepay freasn 101 1,137.12 ID: 1,182 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 firduepay freasn 208 500.00 ID: 1,182 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 firduepay freasn 261 75.00 ID: 1,182 Check Total: 1,712.12
1/16/2026 012 EXECUTIVE MGMT

ORGANIZATION, EXE MGMT-DU
Source pay period: 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 Doc source: Bended code: Fund:sanexepay exdues 101 80.00 ID: 1,182 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 sanexepay exdues 712 40.00 ID: 1,182 Check Total: 120.00
2,480.14Organization T otal:
2,480.14Pay Period T otal (12/27/25 to 01/09/26 ID: 1,183):
2,480.14 Benefit Checks Grand T otal:

Page: 7

Page 18 ends

12/31/2025 City of Sanger 1:28PM
12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025- T
ype 1 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 8
Page: 8

Page 19 ends

01/15/2026 City of Sanger11:19AM
12/27/2025 to 01/09/2026- T
ype 2 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 1
Bank: dirdep - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
68841 1/16/2026 0.00 3,882.38CHAMPION,
AMANDA
68842 1/16/2026 0.00 2,300.70DELGADO, SIERRA
68843 1/16/2026 0.00 2,267.42JACKSON, BRIONNE
68844 1/16/2026 0.00 1,917.03MARTINEZ, LINA
68845 1/16/2026 0.00 4,654.53OLSON, NATHAN
68846 1/16/2026 0.00 307.56GONZALEZ, FRANK G
68847 1/16/2026 0.00 312.56MARTINEZ, DANIEL
68848 1/16/2026 0.00 312.56MELENDEZ, DOLORES
68849 1/16/2026 0.00 312.56MONTELONGO, MICHAEL A
68850 1/16/2026 0.00 1,555.57BARRAGAN, CASIMIRO
68851 1/16/2026 0.00 1,709.01CUEVAS, ERIC
68852 1/16/2026 0.00 3,297.11GOGGINS, JOSHUA
68853 1/16/2026 0.00 1,887.46IRAZOQUI, MARIO
68854 1/16/2026 0.00 1,786.80MURPHY, ROSE
68855 1/16/2026 0.00 2,077.71SANDOVAL, PAUL
68856 1/16/2026 0.00 2,131.62TOVAR, CARLOS
68857 1/16/2026 0.00 584.42VIDRIO, JAVIER
68858 1/16/2026 0.00 4,801.34CAMARENA, KARLA D.
68859 1/16/2026 0.00 2,161.78CASILLAS-TORRES, SMALYNNE 68860 1/16/2026 0.00 1,463.66DE ORTA, MICHELLE
68861 1/16/2026 0.00 1,701.43FLORIAN, STEPHANIE
68862 1/16/2026 0.00 3,323.14HARMON, VIRGINIA
68863 1/16/2026 0.00 833.81NORIEGA, LESLIE
68864 1/16/2026 0.00 1,725.21PEREZ ZUNIGA, MAYRA E
68865 1/16/2026 0.00 1,356.02RAMIREZ, MICHELE
68866 1/16/2026 0.00 2,137.50WAHL, LEICA KATHRINA LACAY 68867 1/16/2026 0.00 2,336.45ALDAZ, MARCO
68868 1/16/2026 0.00 3,355.54ALONSO, JULIA
68869 1/16/2026 0.00 2,440.19CASTELLANOS, LINDSAY
68870 1/16/2026 0.00 3,905.80CORONADO JR, JESUS
68871 1/16/2026 0.00 1,764.79CUELLAR, ADRIANA
68872 1/16/2026 0.00 2,134.62DELGADILLO, ANGEL
68873 1/16/2026 0.00 2,969.98DOLAN, HAYDEN
68874 1/16/2026 0.00 2,256.88ELLIS, SKYLER
68875 1/16/2026 0.00 2,080.38ESCOBAR, MICHAEL
68876 1/16/2026 0.00 2,540.97HOULE, BAILEY
68877 1/16/2026 0.00 1,792.73JACKSON, COLBY
68878 1/16/2026 0.00 2,182.47JAECKEL, AVA
Page: 1

Page 20 ends

01/15/2026 City of Sanger11:19AM
12/27/2025 to 01/09/2026- T
ype 2 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 2
Bank: dirdep - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
68879 1/16/2026 0.00 4,263.64JONES,
ANDY
68880 1/16/2026 0.00 1,868.13LANG, JUSTIN
68881 1/16/2026 0.00 3,411.91LORENTE, RYAN
68882 1/16/2026 0.00 1,934.79MCWILLIAMS, SOFIA
68883 1/16/2026 0.00 2,699.63MIRELES FLORES, MARIA
68884 1/16/2026 0.00 2,905.05PALLAS, MICHAEL L
68885 1/16/2026 0.00 2,677.95PISCHING, MARK G
68886 1/16/2026 0.00 4,471.26PITTS, CRAIG
68887 1/16/2026 0.00 2,185.20SALAZAR, GARRETT
68888 1/16/2026 0.00 861.18SPANGLE, JENNIFER
68889 1/16/2026 0.00 3,356.23TARASCOU, GREGORY
68890 1/16/2026 0.00 2,191.34TREVINO, SANDRA
68891 1/16/2026 0.00 2,277.50VELASQUEZ, SHERRY
68892 1/16/2026 0.00 7,606.04WADDLE, CHRISTOPHER A.
68893 1/16/2026 0.00 1,877.13WASHBURN, HAIDYN
68894 1/16/2026 0.00 2,176.52WILHELM, AUBREE
68895 1/16/2026 0.00 3,711.47WILLIAMS, KENNETH D.
68896 1/16/2026 0.00 4,179.75WILSON, TODD
68897 1/16/2026 0.00 1,948.38ZEPEDA, LEONARDO
68898 1/16/2026 0.00 7,289.35ACEVES CRUZ, JULIAN
68899 1/16/2026 0.00 6,063.56ARGUELLO, SERGIO
68900 1/16/2026 0.00 2,246.21AYERS III, JOHN
68901 1/16/2026 0.00 7,346.95BANDA-TOVAR, JOEL
68902 1/16/2026 0.00 4,620.05BARRAGAN, MELISSA
68903 1/16/2026 0.00 2,345.70BERNAL, SADIE
68904 1/16/2026 0.00 9,756.65BISE, JEFFREY L.
68905 1/16/2026 0.00 10,886.43BOUST, JASON
68906 1/16/2026 0.00 2,412.75BURKDOLL, MARISA
68907 1/16/2026 0.00 1,372.44CAMPBELL, SARAH L
68908 1/16/2026 0.00 7,203.70CASTREJON, EDDIE
68909 1/16/2026 0.00 29,752.34DIAZ, HENRY
68910 1/16/2026 0.00 10,133.14EDWARDS, SHAELA
68911 1/16/2026 0.00 4,617.24FRANCO, RICHARD
68912 1/16/2026 0.00 15,701.92GARCIA, FERNANDO
68913 1/16/2026 0.00 11,399.14GARZA, RAMIRO
68914 1/16/2026 0.00 4,188.10GUILLEN, ROSARIO
68915 1/16/2026 0.00 1,557.92HERNANDEZ, ANDREINA
68916 1/16/2026 0.00 6,603.55HUGHES, TOBIAS
Page: 2

Page 21 ends

01/15/2026 City of Sanger11:19AM
12/27/2025 to 01/09/2026- T
ype 2 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 3
Bank: dirdep - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
68917 1/16/2026 0.00 5,788.44INOSTROS, JESSICA
68918 1/16/2026 0.00 9,699.96JOHNSON, JOSHUA
D
68919 1/16/2026 0.00 2,959.43JONES, KIMBERLY M.
68920 1/16/2026 0.00 2,560.89KAUR, MANDEEP
68921 1/16/2026 0.00 8,021.95MEDINA, JOSE
68922 1/16/2026 0.00 4,201.67MENDEZ, GERARD
68923 1/16/2026 0.00 7,978.02MORALES, JESSE
68924 1/16/2026 0.00 7,612.08MORENO, LOUIS A
68925 1/16/2026 0.00 7,750.64MUNOZ, BERTHA J
68926 1/16/2026 0.00 5,839.88NELSON, AMANDA M
68927 1/16/2026 0.00 3,233.63REYNOLDS, JOHN
68928 1/16/2026 0.00 6,051.08ROARK, TYLER
68929 1/16/2026 0.00 5,674.62RODRIGUEZ, JULIAN R
68930 1/16/2026 0.00 1,975.60RYAN, NICOLE
68931 1/16/2026 0.00 6,451.49SANCHEZ, KELSEY
68932 1/16/2026 0.00 3,913.30SOTO, JOSE O.
68933 1/16/2026 0.00 4,741.04THAO, MENOU A
68934 1/16/2026 0.00 6,132.64TORRES, ROBERT C
68935 1/16/2026 0.00 11,596.10TREVINO, CYNTHIA
68936 1/16/2026 0.00 1,054.89VARELA, TERRI
68937 1/16/2026 0.00 3,249.30WELCH, PAUL M.
68938 1/16/2026 0.00 6,405.48YAMBUPAH, ANGELA C
68939 1/16/2026 0.00 2,432.61ACOSTA, JAVIER
68940 1/16/2026 0.00 1,521.09AVALOS, JORGE
68941 1/16/2026 0.00 2,280.64BARBA CORTES, ERIKA
68942 1/16/2026 0.00 1,308.36CABRERA, MARTIN
68943 1/16/2026 0.00 1,999.95CHOLICO, EDGAR
68944 1/16/2026 0.00 1,735.15EGGLESTON, STEVEN
68945 1/16/2026 0.00 2,325.68FLUETSCH, JOHN
68946 1/16/2026 0.00 2,683.55GONZALEZ, EDDIE
68947 1/16/2026 0.00 1,448.11GONZALEZ, JUAN
68948 1/16/2026 0.00 1,678.48HUERTA, PAUL
68949 1/16/2026 0.00 1,533.99IRAZOQUI, DANIEL T
68950 1/16/2026 0.00 2,819.72JASSO, GEORGE
68951 1/16/2026 0.00 1,837.86LOPEZ, ALEX
68952 1/16/2026 0.00 2,368.45LOPEZ, DIEGO
68953 1/16/2026 0.00 2,056.83MARTIN, RAYMOND
68954 1/16/2026 0.00 1,641.27MAZARIEGO, MANUEL
Page: 3

Page 22 ends

01/15/2026 City of Sanger11:19AM
12/27/2025 to 01/09/2026- T
ype 2 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 4
Bank: dirdep - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
68955 1/16/2026 0.00 1,483.52ORONA, CA
TARINO
68956 1/16/2026 0.00 1,334.92PIMENTEL, SEAN
68957 1/16/2026 0.00 2,578.85REYES, ANTONIO P
68958 1/16/2026 0.00 3,655.64ROSALES, ESPERANZA
68959 1/16/2026 0.00 1,559.20SANTOS, WILLIAM
68960 1/16/2026 0.00 2,397.82WOODS, STEVE
68961 1/16/2026 0.00 762.87HERNANDEZ, KEITH
68962 1/16/2026 0.00 721.18MENDOZA, GRICELDA
68963 1/16/2026 0.00 1,743.87ALBARRAN-PEREZ, VIANEY
68964 1/16/2026 0.00 21.57BARAJAS, LIZETTE
68965 1/16/2026 0.00 543.53DENISTON, CATALINA
68966 1/16/2026 0.00 389.63PETRILLE, BRIANA
68967 1/16/2026 0.00 61.88PINA, CARLOS
68968 1/16/2026 0.00 1,253.70VASQUEZ, APRIL
68969 1/16/2026 0.00 2,054.53ZAMORA, JOAQUIN

0.00 457,788.51Employee Check T otals

0.00 457,788.51Bank dirdep T otals (129 Forms)
Page: 4

Page 23 ends

01/15/2026 City of Sanger11:19AM
12/27/2025 to 01/09/2026- T
ype 2 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 5
Bank: pybank - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
60763 1/16/2026 266.00 0.00HUR

TADO, ESMERALDA
60764 1/16/2026 1,862.68 0.00FRIES, MATTHEW
60765 1/16/2026 2,165.74 0.00LITTLE, LYNDSEE
60766 1/16/2026 1,885.07 0.00MENDEZ, OSCAR
60767 1/16/2026 8,428.31 0.00AYALA, RAMIRO
60768 1/16/2026 2,735.48 0.00PEREZ, SILVESTRE
60769 1/16/2026 1,315.14 0.00REYES, ALEJANDRO
60770 1/16/2026 612.23 0.00PRADO, BRANDON
19,270.65 0.00Employee Check T otals
Bank: pybank - WEST AMERICA BANK
Benefit Checks
Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
60771 1/16/2026 026 98.86 0.00AFLAC
60772 1/16/2026 057 3,253.86 0.00AMERICAN FIDELITY

ASSURANCE
60773 1/16/2026 012 240.00 0.00EXECUTIVE MGMT ORGANIZATION, E 60774 1/16/2026 021 31.90 0.00FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
60775 1/16/2026 041 20.00 0.00GENERAL EMPLOYEES ASSN, DUES G 60776 1/16/2026 030 429.00 0.00MID-MANAGEMENT ASSN, DUES-MM 60777 1/16/2026 008 3,424.24 0.00SANGER FIRE ASSOCIATION, DUES- 60778 1/16/2026 052 954.50 0.00SANGER FIRE ASSOCIATION, FOOD 60779 1/16/2026 010 1,972.11 0.00SANGER POLICE ASSOCIATION, DUE 60780 1/16/2026 045 994.14 0.00STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 60781 1/16/2026 007 410.41 0.00STATIONARY ENGINEERS, LOCAL 39 60782 1/16/2026 059 847.04 0.00TEXAS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 12,676.06Total 0.00
12,676.06 0.00 Payee T otals
31,946.71 0.00Bank pybank T otals (20 Forms)
Page: 5

Page 24 ends

01/15/2026 City of Sanger1 1:19AM
12/27/2025 to 01/09/2026- Type 2 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 6
Bank: wire - FEDERA L TAX PAYMENT
Benefit Checks
Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
2186 1/16/2026 003 134,108.65 0.00WES

TAMERICA BANK
2187 1/16/2026 004 25,374.94 0.00EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 2188 1/16/2026 006 1,507.57 0.00I.C.M.A RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2189 1/16/2026 054 4,210.99 0.00CALPERS 457 PLAN
165,202.15T otal 0.00
165,202.15 0.00 Payee Totals
165,202.15 0.00Bank wire Totals (4 Forms)
Grand Total 197,148.86 457,788.51
654,937.37Next Step:

Account Posting (AP)
Pay Period is Open (Locked)
Totals Checks and Direct Deposit (153 Forms)
Page: 6

Page 25 ends

01/15/2026 City of Sanger11:19AM
12/27/2025 to 01/09/2026- T
ype 2 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 7
Check # Date Payee # Name Amount
Benefit Checks - pending for pay period from 01/24/26 to 02/06/26 ID: 1,185 2/13/2026 010 SANGER POLICE

ASSOCIATION, DUES-POLICE
Source pay period: 12/27/2025 to 01/09/2026 Cycle 26 Doc source: Bended code: Fund:polassnpay poldue 101 595.04 ID: 1,183 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 polassnpay poldue 101 76.27 ID: 1,210 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 polassnpay poldue 101 -76.27 ID: 1,182 12/27/2025 to 01/09/2026 Cycle 26 polassnpay poldue 208 77.33 ID: 1,183 12/27/2025 to 01/09/2026 Cycle 26 polassnpay poldue 261 77.33 ID: 1,183 Check T
otal: 749.70
749.70Organization T otal:
749.70Pay Period T otal (01/24/26 to 02/06/26 ID: 1,185):
749.70 Benefit Checks Grand T otal:

Page: 7

Page 26 ends

01/29/2026 City of Sanger11:09AM
01/10/2026 to 01/23/2026- T
ype 3 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 1
Bank: dirdep - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
68970 1/30/2026 0.00 2,881.79CHAMPION,
AMANDA
68971 1/30/2026 0.00 0.00DELGADO, SIERRA
68972 1/30/2026 0.00 2,443.42JACKSON, BRIONNE
68973 1/30/2026 0.00 2,100.55MARTINEZ, LINA
68974 1/30/2026 0.00 4,671.59OLSON, NATHAN
68975 1/30/2026 0.00 127.86GONZALEZ, FRANK G
68976 1/30/2026 0.00 127.86MARTINEZ, DANIEL
68977 1/30/2026 0.00 127.86MELENDEZ, DOLORES
68978 1/30/2026 0.00 127.86MONTELONGO, MICHAEL A
68979 1/30/2026 0.00 1,555.57BARRAGAN, CASIMIRO
68980 1/30/2026 0.00 1,709.01CUEVAS, ERIC
68981 1/30/2026 0.00 3,328.66GOGGINS, JOSHUA
68982 1/30/2026 0.00 1,816.58IRAZOQUI, MARIO
68983 1/30/2026 0.00 1,537.44MURPHY, ROSE
68984 1/30/2026 0.00 2,077.71SANDOVAL, PAUL
68985 1/30/2026 0.00 2,131.62TOVAR, CARLOS
68986 1/30/2026 0.00 584.42VIDRIO, JAVIER
68987 1/30/2026 0.00 4,869.70CAMARENA, KARLA D.
68988 1/30/2026 0.00 2,378.65CASILLAS-TORRES, SMALYNNE 68989 1/30/2026 0.00 1,351.21DE ORTA, MICHELLE
68990 1/30/2026 0.00 1,660.35FLORIAN, STEPHANIE
68991 1/30/2026 0.00 3,354.70HARMON, VIRGINIA
68992 1/30/2026 0.00 584.11NORIEGA, LESLIE
68993 1/30/2026 0.00 1,550.56PEREZ ZUNIGA, MAYRA E
68994 1/30/2026 0.00 1,454.58RAMIREZ, MICHELE
68995 1/30/2026 0.00 2,212.56WAHL, LEICA KATHRINA LACAY 68996 1/30/2026 0.00 2,681.29ALDAZ, MARCO
68997 1/30/2026 0.00 3,065.72ALONSO, JULIA
68998 1/30/2026 0.00 1,668.27CASTELLANOS, LINDSAY
68999 1/30/2026 0.00 5,578.44CORONADO JR, JESUS
69000 1/30/2026 0.00 1,621.70CUELLAR, ADRIANA
69001 1/30/2026 0.00 1,905.35DELGADILLO, ANGEL
69002 1/30/2026 0.00 3,140.48DOLAN, HAYDEN
69003 1/30/2026 0.00 2,093.70ELLIS, SKYLER
69004 1/30/2026 0.00 1,524.27ESCOBAR, MICHAEL
69005 1/30/2026 0.00 2,400.75HOULE, BAILEY
69006 1/30/2026 0.00 1,517.11JACKSON, COLBY
69007 1/30/2026 0.00 1,890.94JAECKEL, AVA
Page: 1

Page 27 ends

01/29/2026 City of Sanger11:09AM
01/10/2026 to 01/23/2026- T
ype 3 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 2
Bank: dirdep - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
69008 1/30/2026 0.00 3,213.59JONES,
ANDY
69009 1/30/2026 0.00 1,618.45LANG, JUSTIN
69010 1/30/2026 0.00 3,357.58LORENTE, RYAN
69011 1/30/2026 0.00 2,228.29MCWILLIAMS, SOFIA
69012 1/30/2026 0.00 3,029.00MIRELES FLORES, MARIA
69013 1/30/2026 0.00 3,008.58PALLAS, MICHAEL L
69014 1/30/2026 0.00 2,634.07PISCHING, MARK G
69015 1/30/2026 0.00 3,258.15PITTS, CRAIG
69016 1/30/2026 0.00 2,140.73SALAZAR, GARRETT
69017 1/30/2026 0.00 861.18SPANGLE, JENNIFER
69018 1/30/2026 0.00 7,889.02TARASCOU, GREGORY
69019 1/30/2026 0.00 2,249.75TREVINO, SANDRA
69020 1/30/2026 0.00 2,052.33VELASQUEZ, SHERRY
69021 1/30/2026 0.00 3,469.26WADDLE, CHRISTOPHER A.
69022 1/30/2026 0.00 1,659.87WASHBURN, HAIDYN
69023 1/30/2026 0.00 2,608.70WILHELM, AUBREE
69024 1/30/2026 0.00 3,537.99WILLIAMS, KENNETH D.
69025 1/30/2026 0.00 3,935.49WILSON, TODD
69026 1/30/2026 0.00 2,963.84ZEPEDA, LEONARDO
69027 1/30/2026 0.00 4,364.29ACEVES CRUZ, JULIAN
69028 1/30/2026 0.00 4,576.82ARGUELLO, SERGIO
69029 1/30/2026 0.00 2,621.28AYERS III, JOHN
69030 1/30/2026 0.00 5,303.63BANDA-TOVAR, JOEL
69031 1/30/2026 0.00 3,795.11BARRAGAN, MELISSA
69032 1/30/2026 0.00 2,595.97BERNAL, SADIE
69033 1/30/2026 0.00 4,918.58BISE, JEFFREY L.
69034 1/30/2026 0.00 5,150.41BOUST, JASON
69035 1/30/2026 0.00 2,621.30BURKDOLL, MARISA
69036 1/30/2026 0.00 1,191.90CAMPBELL, SARAH L
69037 1/30/2026 0.00 5,718.50CASTREJON, EDDIE
69038 1/30/2026 0.00 5,496.91DIAZ, HENRY
69039 1/30/2026 0.00 4,724.96EDWARDS, SHAELA
69040 1/30/2026 0.00 3,220.09FRANCO, RICHARD
69041 1/30/2026 0.00 4,672.32GARCIA, FERNANDO
69042 1/30/2026 0.00 7,603.42GARZA, RAMIRO
69043 1/30/2026 0.00 4,705.69GUILLEN, ROSARIO
69044 1/30/2026 0.00 2,269.76HERNANDEZ, ANDREINA
69045 1/30/2026 0.00 4,700.10INOSTROS, JESSICA
Page: 2

Page 28 ends

01/29/2026 City of Sanger11:09AM
01/10/2026 to 01/23/2026- T
ype 3 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 3
Bank: dirdep - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
69046 1/30/2026 0.00 6,364.95JOHNSON, JOSHUA
D
69047 1/30/2026 0.00 2,958.62JONES, KIMBERLY M.
69048 1/30/2026 0.00 2,491.28KAUR, MANDEEP
69049 1/30/2026 0.00 4,819.78MEDINA, JOSE
69050 1/30/2026 0.00 3,396.70MENDEZ, GERARD
69051 1/30/2026 0.00 4,878.43MORALES, JESSE
69052 1/30/2026 0.00 5,920.90MORENO, LOUIS A
69053 1/30/2026 0.00 3,920.39MUNOZ, BERTHA J
69054 1/30/2026 0.00 3,726.71NELSON, AMANDA M
69055 1/30/2026 0.00 3,260.39REYNOLDS, JOHN
69056 1/30/2026 0.00 4,298.37ROARK, TYLER
69057 1/30/2026 0.00 4,246.80RODRIGUEZ, JULIAN R
69058 1/30/2026 0.00 1,696.90RYAN, NICOLE
69059 1/30/2026 0.00 3,998.21SANCHEZ, KELSEY
69060 1/30/2026 0.00 3,837.51SOTO, JOSE O.
69061 1/30/2026 0.00 3,992.39THAO, MENOU A
69062 1/30/2026 0.00 4,831.11TORRES, ROBERT C
69063 1/30/2026 0.00 4,735.61TREVINO, CYNTHIA
69064 1/30/2026 0.00 1,861.85VARELA, TERRI
69065 1/30/2026 0.00 2,469.42WELCH, PAUL M.
69066 1/30/2026 0.00 4,441.79YAMBUPAH, ANGELA C
69067 1/30/2026 0.00 2,215.46ACOSTA, JAVIER
69068 1/30/2026 0.00 1,401.34AVALOS, JORGE
69069 1/30/2026 0.00 2,280.64BARBA CORTES, ERIKA
69070 1/30/2026 0.00 1,348.69CABRERA, MARTIN
69071 1/30/2026 0.00 2,382.11CHOLICO, EDGAR
69072 1/30/2026 0.00 1,759.93EGGLESTON, STEVEN
69073 1/30/2026 0.00 2,325.68FLUETSCH, JOHN
69074 1/30/2026 0.00 2,683.55GONZALEZ, EDDIE
69075 1/30/2026 0.00 1,573.56GONZALEZ, JUAN
69076 1/30/2026 0.00 1,762.26HUERTA, PAUL
69077 1/30/2026 0.00 1,610.22IRAZOQUI, DANIEL T
69078 1/30/2026 0.00 2,819.72JASSO, GEORGE
69079 1/30/2026 0.00 2,212.97LOPEZ, ALEX
69080 1/30/2026 0.00 2,202.79LOPEZ, DIEGO
69081 1/30/2026 0.00 2,087.84MARTIN, RAYMOND
69082 1/30/2026 0.00 1,790.58MAZARIEGO, MANUEL
69083 1/30/2026 0.00 1,603.82ORONA, CATARINO
Page: 3

Page 29 ends

01/29/2026 City of Sanger11:09AM
01/10/2026 to 01/23/2026- T
ype 3 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 4
Bank: dirdep - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
69084 1/30/2026 0.00 1,417.44PIMENTEL, SEAN
69085 1/30/2026 0.00 2,068.33REYES,

ANTONIO P
69086 1/30/2026 0.00 3,842.99ROSALES, ESPERANZA
69087 1/30/2026 0.00 1,692.80SANTOS, WILLIAM
69088 1/30/2026 0.00 1,923.98WOODS, STEVE
69089 1/30/2026 0.00 904.92HERNANDEZ, KEITH
69090 1/30/2026 0.00 865.42MENDOZA, GRICELDA
69091 1/30/2026 0.00 1,743.87ALBARRAN-PEREZ, VIANEY
69092 1/30/2026 0.00 17.97BARAJAS, LIZETTE
69093 1/30/2026 0.00 416.14DENISTON, CATALINA
69094 1/30/2026 0.00 464.64JIMENEZ, AUBREY A
69095 1/30/2026 0.00 66.33PETRILLE, BRIANA
69096 1/30/2026 0.00 244.26PINA, CARLOS
69097 1/30/2026 0.00 1,253.70VASQUEZ, APRIL
69098 1/30/2026 0.00 2,324.75ZAMORA, JOAQUIN

0.00 347,277.96Employee Check T otals

0.00 347,277.96Bank dirdep T otals (129 Forms)
Page: 4

Page 30 ends

01/29/2026 City of Sanger11:09AM
01/10/2026 to 01/23/2026- T
ype 3 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 5
Bank: pybank - WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Employee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
60783 1/30/2026 122.86 0.00HUR

TADO, ESMERALDA
60784 1/30/2026 2,382.18 0.00DAVIS, THOMAS ETHAN
60785 1/30/2026 1,661.96 0.00FRIES, MATTHEW
60786 1/30/2026 1,806.67 0.00LITTLE, LYNDSEE
60787 1/30/2026 1,628.40 0.00MENDEZ, OSCAR
60788 1/30/2026 5,069.21 0.00AYALA, RAMIRO
60789 1/30/2026 3,407.17 0.00HUGHES, TOBIAS
60790 1/30/2026 2,735.48 0.00PEREZ, SILVESTRE
60791 1/30/2026 1,442.17 0.00REYES, ALEJANDRO
60792 1/30/2026 82.43 0.00CASTRO ROSALES, NANCY
60793 1/30/2026 82.43 0.00AGUILAR, JOAQUIN
60794 1/30/2026 39.24 0.00MARTINEZ, ALYSSA
60795 1/30/2026 98.12 0.00MARTINEZ, XAVIER
60796 1/30/2026 514.51 0.00PRADO, BRANDON
60797 1/30/2026 78.50 0.00URIETA, AMY
21,151.33 0.00Employee Check T otals
Bank: pybank - WEST AMERICA BANK
Benefit Checks
Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
60798 1/30/2026 026 98.86 0.00AFLAC
60799 1/30/2026 057 40.75 0.00AMERICAN FIDELITY

ASSURANCE
60800 1/30/2026 021 31.90 0.00FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
60801 1/30/2026 052 954.50 0.00SANGER FIRE ASSOCIATION, FOOD 60802 1/30/2026 045 916.14 0.00STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT 2,042.15Total 0.00
2,042.15 0.00 Payee T otals
23,193.48 0.00Bank pybank T otals (20 Forms)
Page: 5

Page 31 ends

01/29/2026 City of Sanger1 1:09AM
01/10/2026 to 01/23/2026- Type 3 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 6
Bank: wire - FEDERA L TAX PAYMENT
Benefit Checks
Check # Date Payee # Name Check Amt Direct Deposit
2190 1/30/2026 003
115,919.11 0.00WESTAMERICA BANK
2191 1/30/2026 004 19,883.83 0.00EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 2192 1/30/2026 006 1,489.88 0.00I.C.M.A RETIREMENT TRUST 457 2193 1/30/2026 054 3,583.46 0.00CALPERS 457 PLAN
140,876.28T otal 0.00
140,876.28 0.00 Payee Totals
140,876.28 0.00Bank wire Totals (4 Forms)
Grand Total 164,069.76 347,277.96
5 11,347.72Next Step: Account Posting (AP)
Pay Period is Open (Locked)
Totals Checks and Direct Deposit (153 Forms)
Page: 6

Page 32 ends

01/29/2026 City of Sanger11:09AM
01/10/2026 to 01/23/2026- T
ype 3 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 7
Check # Date Payee # Name Amount
Benefit Checks - pending for pay period from 01/24/26 to 02/06/26 ID: 1,185 2/13/2026 010 SANGER POLICE

ASSOCIATION, DUES-POLICE
Source pay period: 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 Doc source: Bended code: Fund:polassnpay poldue 101 -76.27 ID: 1,182 12/13/2025 to 12/26/2025 Cycle 26 polassnpay poldue 101 76.27 ID: 1,210 12/27/2025 to 01/09/2026 Cycle 26 polassnpay poldue 101 595.04 ID: 1,183 12/27/2025 to 01/09/2026 Cycle 26 polassnpay poldue 208 77.33 ID: 1,183 12/27/2025 to 01/09/2026 Cycle 26 polassnpay poldue 261 77.33 ID: 1,183 Check T
otal: 749.70
749.70Organization T otal:
749.70Pay Period T otal (01/24/26 to 02/06/26 ID: 1,185):

Check # Date Payee # Name Amount
Benefit Checks - pending for pay period from 02/07/26 to 02/20/26 ID: 1,186 2/27/2026 030 MID-MANAGEMENT

ASSN, DUES-MM
Source pay period: 01/10/2026 to 01/23/2026 Cycle 26 Doc source: Bended code: Fund:midmgmtpay mmdues 101 135.14 ID: 1,184 01/10/2026 to 01/23/2026 Cycle 26 midmgmtpay mmdues 261 19.50 ID: 1,184 01/10/2026 to 01/23/2026 Cycle 26 midmgmtpay mmdues 61 1 20.18 ID: 1,184 01/10/2026 to 01/23/2026 Cycle 26 midmgmtpay mmdues 621 20.18 ID: 1,184 01/10/2026 to 01/23/2026 Cycle 26 midmgmtpay mmdues 712 39.00 ID: 1,184 Check T
otal: 234.00
2/27/2026 041 GENERAL

EMPLOYEES ASSN, DUES GEN EMPS
Source pay period: 01/10/2026 to 01/23/2026 Cycle 26 Doc source: Bended code: Fund:genemppay gendue 101 5.00 ID: 1,184 01/10/2026 to 01/23/2026 Cycle 26 genemppay gendue 712 5.00 ID: 1,184 Check T
otal: 10.00
2/27/2026 012 EXECUTIVE MGMT

ORGANIZATION, EXE MGMT-DU
Source pay period: 01/10/2026 to 01/23/2026 Cycle 26 Doc source: Bended code: Fund:sanexepay exdues 101 80.00 ID: 1,184 01/10/2026 to 01/23/2026 Cycle 26 sanexepay exdues 712 40.00 ID: 1,184 Check Total: 120.00
364.00Organization T otal:

Page: 7

Page 33 ends

01/29/2026 City of Sanger1 1:09AM
01/10/2026 to 01/23/2026- Type 3 Cycle 26
Payroll Final Check ListpyChkLst Page: 8
364.00Pay Period Total (02/07/26 to 02/20/26 ID: 1,186):
1,113.70 Benefit Checks Grand Total:

Page: 8

Page 34 ends

Prepared by: Lina Martinez Approved by: _Nathan Olson_____________________

REVIEW: City Manager: _NCO_____ Finance: __VH_____ City Attorney: ______ TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION __X_ Consent
__X_ Info Item
____ Action Item
____ Department Report
____ Redevelopment Agency

____ Public Hearing
____ Matter Initiated by a Council Member
____ Other
____ Continued to: __________

For the Meeting of: February 19, 2026
Agenda Item No.: E-3

CITY OF SANGER

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

To: Mayor and City Council
From: Karla Camarena, Finance Manager
Subject: Warrants- January 2026

RECOMMENDATION:

Warrants, including Check Nos. 96331 through 96534, for the month of January 2026.

Page 35 ends

apChklst
0110912026 9:27:09AM
waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Date Vendor
Page:1
Amount Paid Check Total
103.50 103.50
1,111 .001,111.00
lnvoice
2417 PET VETS 95573
ADVENTIST HEALTH TOX 2676
AIRGAS USA LLC 5520520071
9167674829
ALERT-O-LITE, tNC. 0189167-tN
ALL VALLEY SPRAY SERV 378207
AMERITAS 301379
301 379
301379
301379
301 379
22992APGN INC

BEAR ELECTRICAL SOLU
BSK & ASSOCIATES INC.
28749
28735
Ar32533
4132238
4t32544

REIMBBURKDOLL, MARISA
CALED

CENCALAUTO & TRUCK I

CENTRAL VALLEY TOXIC(
CITY OF FRESNO 20010484
2001 0486
256937464
lnv Date Description
12t4t2025 VET CARE #170671
121312025 DRUG/ALCOHOL TESTING
10t31t2025 oXYGEN
12t 16t2025 OXYGEN (MED|CAL)
1211912025 SUPPLIES FOR EQUIPMENT
1211212025 SVCS/ WEED ABATEMENT
FinalGheck List
Gity of Sanger
Bank
Check #
96331
96332
96333
96334
96335
96336
96337
96338
96339
96340
96341
96342
96343
96344
96345
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
119t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
04418
11604
10494
00025
04173
07024
1 0960
12958
00097
13020
02285
09934
02464
05051
09872
306.11
293.59
127.00
2,668.40
2,070.00
1,433.60
1 ,318.15
715.68
2,200.00
2,064.00
165.00
690.67
170.00

30.00 30.00
2,208.18
2,085.72
751.02
599.70
127.00
8,205.83
2,200.0o
2,229.00
890.67

30.00 2,300.00
1,396.39
285.00
4,293.90
751.02
2,175.00 2,175.00
12t22t2025
12t15t2025
12t29t2025
't2t8t2025
1t30t2026
12t19t2025
DENTAL CLAIMS 12122125
DENTAL CLAIMS 12112125
DENTAL CLAIMS 12126125
DENTAL CLAIMS 1215125
DENTALADMIN FEES JAN'26
R&M/ NEUROS BLOWER-1
300006884 lltl7t2025ECONOMICDEVELOPMENT"l 2,300.00
DEC 11812026 AUTOMOTIVEPARTS 1,396.39
343053 91912025 DRUG SCREEN 285.00
11 I3OI2O25 SIGNAL LIGHT MAI NT/REPAI F
11 I3OI2O25 SIGNAL LIGHT MAINT/REPAI F
1 21 1 812025 LAB : WATER ANALYS I S
121 1612025 LAB:WATE R ANALYSI S
1 21 1 812025 LAB:WATE R ANALYSI S
12t1t2025 GYM (DEC)
11 I 1212025 QTR4/FY25 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
11 I 1212025 QTR1 /FY26 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
121112025 ETHERNET SRV (DSPCH) #9€COMCAST
Page: 1
'h

Page 36 ends

apChklst
0110912026 9:27:09AM
Bank : waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Gheck# Date Vendor
96346 1t9t2026 08477
Voucher:
(Continued)
lnvoice
coMcAsToABLE 230483
234428
5646
coMcAST CABLE COMM| 001003227631
CSG CONSULTANTS INC. 8251706
63857
F251317
CSJVRMA INVO448
DEFINITIVE STAFFING SC 16383
16341
16404
16425
16362
16441
DEROTIC EMERGENCY E NO-6598

DON'S MINISTORAGE JAN
ENTERPRISE FM TRUST 120325
lnv Date Descriotion
INTERNET CAM (501 ACAD) #
INTERNET SRV.PD #81 55500,
CABLE SRV-PD #81 555001 60(

PHONE SERVICE - FD
Page= 2
Amount Paid Check Total
278.19
257.98

28.64 572.88
564.81
572.88
237.62
728.80
237.62
728.80
5,081.07
1,221.00
260.00
442,252.00
6,562.07
442,252.00
1,916.24
2,174.50

50.00 1,916.24
2,174.50

50.00 7,078.50

7.057.80
6,788.25
6,098.40
4,697.10
4,1 93.1 0
445.40
35,913.15
445.40
100.00
1,665.20
1,025.00
100.00
1,665.20
1,025.00
FinalGheck List
City of Sanger
96347
96348
96349
96350
96351
96352
96353
96354
96355
96356
96357
96358
96359
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
119t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t912026
Voucher:
12962
05241
01611
11727
11603
02324
00515
08141
12162
11435
12792
11324
12941
CORELOGICSOLUTIONS 30824210 llI3OI2O2SPROFESSIONALSERVICES COUNTY OF FRESNO, TR 383946 1212212025 AMB REGISTRATION 12t3t2025
12n/2025
12t8t2025
1t2t2026
12t12t2025
11t28t2025
12t19t2025
12t26t2025
12t5t2025
1t2t2026
1t5t2026
1211 12025 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
121 1212025 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1211 12025 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
12t19t2025 2025-26 3RD QTR |NVOTCE
CUMMINS SALESAND SE Y4-251236583 1212212025 E120 FUEL SENDER CURTIS&SONS, LN 1021372 1211812025 THERMAL IMAGER
CVFCA MEMBERSHIP 1012212025 CVFCA MEMBERSHIP
TEMP LABOR SRV -PE 12I7I2I
TEMP LABOR SRV- PE 111212(
TEMP LABOR SRVS -PE 1211.

TEMP LABOR SRVS - PE 1212
TEMP LABOR SRVS -PE 11131
TEMP LABOR SRVS -PE 1212,
T120 WATER TANK FILL SCRI
11112026 HR STORAGE
12t3t2025 CAR RENTL (J. JOHNSON) #6
1211912025 OPEN PO - FINANCIAL SERVIESJ SERVICES 2505
Page.2

Page 37 ends

apGhkLst
0110912026 9:27:09AM
Bank: waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Gheck# Date Vendor
96360 119t2026 04821
Voucher:
96361 1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
12997
96362 00299
(Continued)
lnvoice
FERGUSON ENTERPRISE OO5O7O3
6402459
0050837
0050758
FLOCK GROUP INC INV-78456
FRESNO CITY COLLEGE 19712893
1 9694935
1 9501435
FRESNO COUNTY DEPT I P-6O74
Page: 3
Amount Paid Check Totallnv Date Description

R&M/ PARTS FOR BW LEAK

CC KITCHEN SINK
WELL 25

R&M/ PARTS FOR BW LEAK

LPR FLOCK CAMERASYSTEN
FinalCheck List
City of Sanger
12t12t2025
1211112025
12t15t2025
12t15t2025
11t3t2025
621.O2
293.63
130.02
124.21
22,400.00
105.00

84.00 61.00
1,533.50
1,421.81
1,421.81
1,421.81
443.42
150.00

65.00 204.72
1,168.88
22,400.00
250.00
1,533.50
4,265.43
443.42
3,798.41
215.00
204.72
1,796.13
96363
96364
96365
96366
96367
96368
96369
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
00318
10105 FRESNO COUNTY EDC

HALICO GOLD LLC
HARTFORD-PRIORITY AC 56459 1 1 37366
HOFFMAN SECURIry 753403
752946
IMSALLIANCE 25-2823
INDUSTRIAL ELECTRICAI. PI-O88O2O
1211112025 REGIST. A. NELSON
121812025 REGIST. J. BOUST
911512025 REGIST. J. ACEVES-CRUZ
121512025 DISPATCHING SERVICES - DI
121 1 OI2O25 MEMBER DU ES/QTR2
3I1OI2O25 MEMBER DUES/QTR3
512312025 MEMBER DUES/QTR4
11t30t2025 K-9 FOOD
1212212025 SERVICE CALL CHARGE
1212212025 SECU RITY SERVICES
11 121 12025 NAM ETAGS-PASSPO RT
113112025 EE DISABILITY/ LIFE INSURA 3,798.41
Q22025-2026
Q32024-2025
Q42024-2025
sAN202511301t9t2026
Voucher:
1t912026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
12253
08753
1 0739
11071
06804 1112612025 R&M/ REPLACE BLOCK HEAT 1,796.13
Page:3

Page 38 ends

apGhkLst
0110912026 9:27:09AM
Bank : waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check# Date Vendor
96370 1t9t2026 10972
Voucher:
(Continued)
lnvoice
LIEBERT CASSIDY WHIT]\ 31 0931
310930
LIFEASSIST, INC. 2032647
2038522
2038524
LIGHTHOUSE ELECTRICI 5D226
LOZANO SMTTH 2264591
2264590
LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY 422993
423419
MAC GENERAL ENGINEEI 1
lnv Date Description
PERDT EM 1 I 1 0t26-1 I 1't t2026
PERDT EM 1 I 17 t26-1 I 1 8t26
PERD| EM 1 t24t26-1 t25t26
PERDT EM 1 t31 t26-2t 1 t26
PERDTEM 2t7t26-2t8t26
PERDT EM 2t 1 4t26-2t 1 5t26
PERDT EM 2t21 t26-2t22t26
PERDT EM 2t28t26-3t 1 t26
PERDTEM 3t7t26-3t8t26
PERDT EM 3t 1 4t26-3t 1 5t26
PERDIEM 1119126
PERDIEM 2116126

PRE-EM PLOYEE PHYSICALS
Page: 4
Amount Paid Check Total
102.00
102.00
102.00
102.00
102.00
102.00
102.00
102.00
102.00
102.00

34.00 34.00
3,231.90
1,088.00
3,231.90
350.00

2.64 776.32
988.80
350.00

2.64 776.32
988.80

JOHNSON, JOSHUA PERDIEM

PERDIEM

PERDIEM
KINGS INDUSTRIAL OCCI 320243
FinalGheck List
City of Sanger
1t6t2026
1t6t2026
1t6t2026
1t6t2026
1t6t2026
1t6t2026
1t6t2026
1t6t2026
1t6t2026
1t6t2026
116t2026
1t6t2026
12t5t202596371
96372
96373
96374
96375
96376
96377
96378
96379
96380
96381
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
119t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
11757
11627
02223
10019
12029
00533
00534
12706
02614
02317
10564
KOEFRAN INDUSTRIES II\ 0000690935 1113012025 ACO FREEZERS LANGUAGE LINE SERVIC 11784483 11 I3OI2O25 TRANSLATION SRV LES SCHWAB TIRES 56400429756 12t24t2025 TTRES - UN|T #132 & 11 LEXIS NEXIS COPLOGIC I 1030003279 11130/2025 ONLINE REPORTING SYST 1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
11 t30t2025 NEGOTTATTONS
11 I3OI2O25 LEGAL SERVICES
121 1212025 EMS SUPPLIES
1212612025 EMS SU PPLI ES
1212612025 EMS SUPPLI ES
1211812025 XMAS DECOR/ BREHLER SQI
121912025 PROF LEGAL SRVS. NOV
121912025 PROF LEGAL SRVS - NOV
121812025 SUPPLIES
1213012025 LARG SHOE CVRS
12t24t2025 LOCAL STREET CtP 23-02
3,015.00
810.00
4,887.53
3,540.69
1,831.06
6,837.69
6,517.50
2,590.96
234.94

85.35 173,819.22
3,825.00
10,259.28
6,837.69
9,108.46
320.29
173,819.22
Page:4

Page 39 ends

apChklst
0110912026 9:27:09AM
BanK : waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check# Date Vendor
96382 1t9t2026 06571
Voucher:
(Continued)
lnvoice
METRO UNIFORM & ACCI 303077
303089
303084
300973
303109
303104
MGT OF AMERICA CONST 65880
MOORE TWINING ASSOC 00068278
2506496
2512774
MV TRANSPORTATION IN 10212025
lnv Date Description
11t25t2025 UNrF SUPPLTES (PD)
11t25t2025 UNtF SUPPLTES (PD)
11t25t2025 UN|F SUPPLTES (PD)
1OI3I2O25 M. KAUR UNIFORM
11t25t2025 UNIF SUppLtES (S. BERNAL)
11t25t2025 UN|F SUppLtES (M. BURKDOT
11t20t2025 SB-90 CLATMS FY26
1013112025 DOM & IND/ PERMIT SAMPLII
7 I3OI2O25 INDUSTRYS/ PERMIT SAMPLI
1211512025 INDUSTRYS / PERMIT SAMPL
1012112025 SENIOR CENTER - PUMPKIN
Page: 5
Amount Paid Check Total
1,224.19
1,213.21
1 ,194.89
145.58

76.05 76.05
1,300.00
3,929.97
1,300.00
1,038.80
1 ,639.10
6,741.00
202.00
136.00
135.00
7,079.00
135.00
200.00 200.00
FinalCheck List
City of Sanger
96383
96384
96385
96386
96387
96388
96389
96390
96391
119t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
119t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
11146
06909
00596
08962
MIGHTY MART INC 11302025 11t30t2025 FUEL - PD

MISSION LINEN SUPPLY DEC
1,038.80
1213112025 DEC - PW UNIFORM/ LINEN S 1 ,639.10
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
12436
11735
03356
12s97
12830
NAVIA BENEFIT SOLUTIO 11052937 1213012025 COBRACOVERAGE - DEC'25 OFFICE DEPOT 450047828001
447498478001
449363175001
44661 391 5001
445012674001
447161452001
REIMB
11t21t2025
12t2t2025
12t3t2025
11t21t2025
11t21t2025
12t5t2025
12t22t2025
215.50
148.47
105.94

89.99 69.14

57.36 24.99
23,325.81
7,923.82
7,501.50
3,029.50
462.75

OLSON, NATHAN

OLSSON, INC
686.40

24.99 42,243.38
546287
56041 0
549805
557182
562449
7t27t2025
11t24t2025
8t25t2025
10t26t2025
1211612025

DRY ERASE BOARD

OFFICE SUPPLIES

GYM (DEC)

PROVIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL TI

PROVIDE TRAFFIC SIGNAL TI
Page: 5

Page 40 ends

apchklst
0110912026 9:27:09AM
BanK : waap WESTAMERIGA BANK
Gheck# Date Vendor
96392 1t9t2026 08739
Voucher:
(Continued)
lnvoice
O'REILLYAUTO PARTS 2774-236493
2774-237477
2774-237032
2774-237655
PAYLESS TRANSMISSION 21 O9O

PEREZ, SILVESTRE REIMB
PMSI 279393
279303
279406
279408
PRETZER FARMS & SER\ 684
SANGER CHAMBER OF C 6213
6214
SANGER GROCERY OUTI 1OO8
SEQUOIACOUNCIL 1 535
SILVA'S OIL COMPANY IN( 479493
477072
STRYKER SALES CORP 9211183327
lnv Date Description
1211612025 BATTERY
12121 12025 WIPER BLADES
1211912025 DEF FOR SEWER TRUCK
12I23I2O25INSTALL REC TUBE FOR TRA
121 17 12025 TRANSMISSI ON ASSEBLY
1211512025 CWEA RENEWAL FEE
121 11 12025 HVAC THERMOSTATS PELICI
121512025 BOYS & GIRLS CLUBA.C.
1211512025 CM-CITY HALL HVAC REPAIRI
12t16t2025 BOYS & GTRLS CLUBA.C.
111312026 ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PESTICI
121 1912025 PROF SERVICES-JAN
12t19t2025 TREK TO THE TREE (COUNC
12t17t2025 PET FOOD
1212212025 REN EWAL K.ZARAGOZA
1211612025 OIL: WELL MAINT
91812025 BLUE DEF DIESEL
1 2129 12025 G U RN EY MATTRESS/R ESTRI
Page: 6
Amount Paid Check Total
171.70

49.99 49.80

43.48 4,800.00
129.00 129.00
3,808.15
1,196.50
1,142.04
660.75
500.00
6,807.44
500.00
250.50
295.45
2,674.69
250.50
295.45
FinalCheck List
City of Sanger
96393
96394
96395
96396
96397
96398
96399
96400
96401
96402
96403
96404
'1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
13022
12062
10475
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
11912026
Voucher:
119t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
119t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
10777
07260
12513
12659
00433
12634
09368
03709
04287
RADAR SHOP, THE RS-13575 1211712025 LIDAR SERVICE
REXEL USA INC s144098999.001 12t10t2025 R&M / UNtTAp FOR AERATOR ROCKEEZ ENGINEERING 12488A 1213012025 MINOR EQUIP/ ELECTRICAL ( 2,674.69 6,666.67
595.00
899.38

95.00 1,570.91
238.00
4,665.39
314.97
4,800.00
7,261.67
899.38

95.00 1,808.91
4,665.39
Page:6

Page 41 ends

apchkLst
0110912026 9:27:09AM
Bank : waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check# Date Vendor
96405 1t9t2026 10973
Voucher:
(Continued)
lnvoice
SUPERIOR POOL PRODU Q2033442
Q2033491
Q2033434
Q2033398
Q2033490
Q2033422
SWANSON FAHRNEY FOI 256367

TELEFLEX LLC
TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS 129957
UN|TY tT 111925
UNLIMITED TECHNOLOG 82091
UNWIRED BROADBAND II 02578559
VALLEY SHREDDING 216127
VERIZONWIRELESS 6130957554
VEZINA INDUSTRIES INC 104489
VIDEO INSPECTION SER\ 9993
9992
WEST VALLEY CONSTRU 9
lnv Date Descriotion
BULK CHLORINE - WELL 9
BULK CHLORINE - WELL 25
BULK CHLORINE - WELL 8
BULK CHLORINE - WELL 2A
BULK CHLORINE - WELL 7A

CREDIT-BULK CHLORINE - W
VEHIC MAINT'17 FORD EXPL
Page: 7
Amount Paid Check Total
1,005.57
868.12
757.60
752.37
653.98
-16.59
1,990.74
4,021.05
1,990.74
1,625.44
1,650.00

59.66 32.00
259.99

45.00 266.07
9,500.00
1,625.44
1,650.00

59.66 32.00
259.99

45.00 266.07
9,500.00
3,600.00
1,050.00
9,413.40
4,650.00
9,413.40
FinalGheck List
City of Sanger
12t8t2025
12t15t2025
12t5t2025
12t212025
12t15t2025
12t4t2025
12t9t202596406
96407
96408
96409
96410
96411
96412
96413
96414
96415
96416
08757
11596
12252
08821
09239
10j48
11840
08709
13019
01086
11213
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
1t9t2026
Voucher:
9510883003 12t1t2025 10 DRTLL / 10 YEAR REPLACE
121 17 12025 SCADA REPORTI NG
1211612025 OVERHEAD PAGING SYSTEM
121112025 ALARM MONITOR. NOV
1213012025 BROADBAND YRD (JAN'26)
11 I3OI2O25 DOC SHREDDING
121 1 312025 TOUGH BOOK COMPUTERS
121 1212025 AN I MAL SH ELTER
1211812025 R&M / CLARIFIER MAINT
1211812025 R&M / CLARIFIER MAINT
12t4t2025 WELL 22
Page: 7

Page 42 ends

apchklst
0110912026 9:27:09AM
FinalCheck List
Gity of Sanger
Page: 8
Amount Paid Gheck Totallnv Date Description

TOMBSTONE WATER CONNE
LOCAL STREET IMPR PROJ 2
LOCAL STREETS IMPR CIP 2z
TRACT 6493
WELL 19

SOMERSET SUBDIV

CENTRALAVE RECONSTRUC

BETHEL AVE REHAB-ANNADI
VETS MEM PLMA P2

CMAQ RESIDENTIAL PAVING
AHSC I NFRASTRUCTURE IM[
LOCAL STREETS IMPR CIP 2{
SOMERSET SUBDIV PHASE 2
WELL22

GRNWD/JENSEN INTERSEC I

NORTH & GREENWOOD SWF

ALMONDAVE REPONSTA(BE

ACAD-JENSEN-GRNWD BI KE

PITMAN FARMS HATCHERY

SERENADE II SUBDIVISION

JENSEN RECONSTRUCTION
HSIP CYCLE 11 PROJECT
SPR 2024-16 AUTRY PLUMBII

SANGER LEAD & COPPER
SPR 2025-08 TRACTOR SUPF
TRACT 5826 - GREENWOOD

LOCAL LIMIT STUDY

BETHEL AVE REHAB-CITY LIN
TRACT 6327-GRNWD ESTATE
ACADEMY & 7TH EV CHRG S'

BETHEL & ALMOND TRAFFIC

SANGER GENERAL GIS SRVS
SPR 2024.08 SANGER FENCE

SGMA IMPLEMENTATION
SPR 2023-1 4-STORAGE STAT
Bank : waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Vendor
96418 1t9t2026 00931
Voucher:
(Continued)
lnvoice
YAMABE & HORN ENGINE 54818
54821
54830
54837
54817
54826
54844
54843
54838
54845
54835
54850
54841
54819
54846
58414
54823
54847
54832
54842
54836
54827
54840
54834
54848
548'13
54854
54822
54815
54583
54825
54855
54833
54811
54828
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
1211712025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t1712025
12t17t2025
11t11t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
29,516.60
26,677.70
22,134.68
21,462.50
15,303.75
13,688.70
13,500.00
13,032.50
11,787.50
9,713.75
6,467.40
6,425.00
6,095.00
5,614.95
5,574.60
5,119.55
3,445.00
2,940.00
2,905.00
2,537.50
2,528.95
2,457.50
2,156.10
1,883.75
1,867.50
1,727.35
1,600.00
1,520.25
1,518.40
1,470.00
1,406.25
1,161.25
1,102.50
840.00
595.00
Page:8

Page 43 ends

apChkLst
0110912026 9:27:09AM
FinalCheck List
City of Sanger
Page: 9
Amount Paid Gheck TotalInv Date Descriotion
ACADEMY & 7TH EV CHARGII
2024 ENCROACHMENT PERI\J

JENSEN & INDIANOLA TRAFF

STANDARD PLAN UPDATES

LOCAL STREETS IMPR PROJ

JENSEN AVE DENTAL OFF
TRACT 6504
TRACT 6504
2025 ENCROACHMENT PERIV

TOI LET/HANDWASH (RANGE
Bank
Check #
waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Date Vendor
(Continued)
lnvoice
96419 1t9t2026 04596
Voucher:
54852
54831
54824
54816
54829
54820
54579
54849
ZWEIGLE SEPTIC SERVI( ;;33?
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
11t11t2025
12t17t2025
12t17t2025
12t5t2025
420.00
307.60
280.00
245.00
210.00
175.00
140.00
140.00

72.30 225.00
249,766.38
225.00
Sub total foTWESTAMERICA BANK: 1,139,872.54
Page:9

Page 44 ends

apchklst
01r09t2026 9:27:09AM
FinalCheck List
Gity of Sanger
Page: 10
Grand TotalAll Checks: 1,139,872.5488 checks in this report.

Page: 10

Page 45 ends

apGhkLst
0111212026 2:22=O3PM
waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Date Vendor
1t12t2026 07711
Voucher:
1t1212026 10742
Voucher:
1t12t2026 08151
Voucher:

Page: 1
Amount Paid Check Totallnvoice
CALGON CARBON CORP. 90214323

GARCIA, FERNANDO PERDIEM

GARZA, RAMIRO PERDIEM
lnv Date Description
GAC WELL 7A- CARBSORB 3
PER DtEM 1 t13t26-1 t15t26
PER DtEM 1 t13t26-1 I 15t26
FinalGheck List
Gity of Sanger
Bank
Check #
96420
96421
96422
11t6t2025
1t12t2026
1t12t2026
82,400.00
149.00
149.00
82,400.00
149.00
149.00
82,698.00Sub total for WESTAMERICA BANK:

Page: 1

Page 46 ends

apGhklst
0111212026 2:22:O3PM
3 checks in this report.

FinalGheck List
Gity of Sanger
Page: 2
Grand Total All Ghecks: 82,698.00
Page:2

Page 47 ends

apchklst
01113//2026 8:49:40AM
Bank : waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check# Date Vendor
96423 1t13t2026 13023
Voucher:

FinalCheck List
Gity of Sanger
Page: 1
lnvoice lnv Date Descriotion Amount Paid Gheck Total
LIBERTY CHEVROLET VIN#162780 111212026 2026 CHEVROLET SILVERAD( 38,821.00 38,821.00 Sub total for WESTAMERICA BANK: 38,821.00
Page:1

Page 48 ends

apchkLst
0l,nU2026 8:49:40AM
I checks in this report.

FinalGheck List
City of Sanger
Page: 2
Grand TotalAll Checks: 38,821.00
Page:2

Page 49 ends

apChkLst
0112612026 9:14:34AM
Bank : waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check# Date Vendor
96424 1126t2026 04418
Voucher:
1126t2026 09470
Voucher:
lnv Date Description
12t21t2025 VET CARE #171082
Page: I
Amount Paid Check Total
257.40 257.402417 PET VETS

ACTION TOWNG DIVE

ADS SECURITY

ADVENTIST HEALTH

ALEX FOOD MART &

APACHE SMOG INC

AT&T MOBILIW

AT&T MOBILITY

AT&T MOBILITY
AT&T MOBILIry

AUTOZONE, INC

B&M SUPPLIERS LLC

BERNAL, SADIE

BLUETRITON BRANDS
FinalCheck List
City of Sanger
lnvoice
95839
96425
96426
96427
96428
96429
96430
96431
96432
96433
96434
96435
96436
96437
1 064
1062
1063
013926
013927
2705
12t31t2025
10t31t2025
11t30t2025
12t31t2025
12131t2025
1t6t2026
1,207.50
1,162.00
1,125.00
150.00
105.00
1,158.00
468.00
378.00
198.00
151.18
4J80.76
4,030.03
799.82
654.34
48f .87

42.38 910.00

60.00 150.30
140.26

96.68 102.64
3,494.50
255.00
1 ,1 58.00
1,044.00
151.18
8,210.79
799.82
654.34
487.87

42.38 910.00

60.00 387.24
102.64

VEHC EVID STOMGE

VEHC EVID STORAGE

ALARM MONITORING (YARD)

ALARM MONITORING (SYC)

DRUG/ALCOHOL TESTING
1t26t2026 12806
Voucher:
112612026 11604
Voucher:
1t26t2026 04482
Voucher:

SEPT

OCT-NOV
DEC
056505
287286160185
287286160185
287305911613
831514171
287288454255
02862897342
JRP-0113
REIMB
0648930276838
0518730001059
06A8730276837
REIMB
1t8t2026
12t8t2025
1t2t2026
9I3OI2O25 CAR WASHES (PD) SEPT
11t30t2025 CAR WASHES (pD) OCT-NOV
12t31t2025 CAR WASHES (PD) DEC
11512026 F-250 otl CHANGE1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
04701
07501
07501
07501
07501
04311
12694
13025
12877
CELL PHN CHRGS. PD

CELL PHN CHRGS - PD

CELL PHN CHRGS
1212712025 CELL PHN CHRGS
111012026 CELL PHN CHRGS-FD
11112026 WPER BLADES
121212025 NITRILE GLOVES
1t9r2026 GYM (DEC/JAN)
11612026 BOTTLED WATER
12t20t202s BOTTLED WATER (PD)
1r6t2026 BOTTLED WATER (FTNANCE)
11112026 FOOD FOR CRIME SCENE1126t2026 04721
Voucher:
96438 BOUST, JASON
Page: 1

Page 50 ends

apchkLst
0112612026 9:14:34AM
Bank: waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check# Date Vendor
96439
(Continued)
lnvoice

CAMARENA, KARLA

CANON FINANCIAL
MILAGE
42303684
CHEVROLET BUICK GMC CVCS2O6O89
cvcs206748
coMcAsT 258822612
259286585
coMcAsT CABLE 215',t87
230483
234428
5646
CONSERVATION TECHNIX 1258
1265
coRELOGtC SOLUTTONS 30827356
lnv Date Description
111312026 MTLAGE 12t12t2s
1211212025 COPIER LEASES & USAGE
Page: 2
Amount Paid Check Total

84.28 84.28
1,640.40 1,640.40
FinalGheck List
Gity of Sanger
96440
96441
96442
96443
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
10678
1 1599
00922
09872
08477
12912
05241
11262
11727
12975
02798
12661
12559
11324
00300
09586
12t30t2025
12t3'v2025
12t15t2025
1t1t2026
12118t2025
1t3t2026
1ni2026
1t8r2026
12t2t2025
1t2t2026
12t31t2025
VEHIC MAINT'17 CHEVY
VEHIC MAINT '19 CHEVY
ETHERNET SRVS (501 ACAD)

ETHERNET SRV (DSPCH)

INTERNET SRV-FINANCE
INTERNET CAM (501 ACAD)
INTERNET SRV.PD

CABLE SRV-PD

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

COMPUTER SOFTWARE
3,340.64
1,009.78
770.60
758.16
565.65
278.19
257.98

56.80 12,170.90
3,062.76
336.35
7,000.00
7,241.39
943.50
5,000.04
513.99
225.00
546.00
2,083.28
123.78
776.37
4,350.42
1,528.76
1,158.62
15,233.66
336.35
7,000.00
8,184.89
5,000.04
5'13.99
225.00
546.00
2,083.28
123.78
776.37
96444
96445
96446
96447
96448
96449
96450
96451
96452
96453
96454
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:

CRISCOM COMPANY, THE
CSG CONSULTANTS INC.

DASH PLATFORM LLC

DELRAY TIRE &

DOLAN, HAYDEN

EAGLESHIELD PEST

ENTERPRISE FM TRUST

FEDERAL EXPRESS

FIRE APPARATUS
271656
8251 868
64276
tNVo1543576
5001 6551 9
REIMB
221874
010626
9-1 09-57314
0205\ /20697
1t5t2026
1t7t2026
10t6t2025
111512026 GRANT WRITING SVCS FOR

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

RECREATION SOFTWARE
12t19t2025 TTRES-PD VEH#SI 1 6
111512026 DOLAN- SYMPOSIUM
811912025 PEST CONTROL SERVICES
11612026 CAR RENTL (J. JOHNSON)
1211912025 DELIVERY SRV-PD
11512026 E12O FUEL ISSUES
Page:2

Page 51 ends

apChkLst
0112612026 9:14:34AM
Bank
Check #
wAapWESTAMERICA BANK
Date Vendor
(Continued)

FLEETZOOM

FOREMOST

FRESNO COUNTY
FRESNO OXYGEN, INC.

FRESNO TRUCK CENTER

FRONTIER

GIERLICH-MITCHELL, INC

HALICO GOLD LLC

HARMON, VIRGINIA

HOULE, BAILEY

IAFC MEMBERSHIP
IAPE

INNOVATIVE

INTERWEST

JACK'S REFRIGERATION,

JONES CONSTRUCTION

KOEFRAN INDUSTRIES
Page: 3
Amount Paid Check Total
360.00 360.00
1,128.851,128.85
lnv Date Description
11612026 SVCS/NORTH & GRNWOOD
1OI7I2O25 CRIME PREV SUPPLIES
113112026 DISPATCHING SERVICES FY
12131 12025 DISPATCHING SERVICES FY
12t31t2025 AQUATTCS CO2
FinalCheck List
City of Sanger
96455
96456
96457
96458
96459
96460
96461
96462
96463
96464
96465
96466
96467
96468
96469
96470
96471
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1126t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1126t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
10423
08816
04867
00331
07174
10345
1 3029
12253
12994
12424
01 933
10651
12801
09085
00445
13024
11627
lnvoice
F211225
741995
so23294
so23242
009173541 1
R001230802:01
JAN
16916
sAN20251231

PER DIEM
REIMB
000293880
M26-C426675
4 2924657
80151
2822
0000696001
1t15t2026
1t31t2025
12t11t2025
1t30t2026
1t21t2026
12t15t2025
12t31t2025
1t11t2026
1t7t2026
12t31t2025
9t29t2025
11t12t2025
12t31t2025
1,876.17
5,593.31
3,085.44
279.98
675.00
100.00
285.00

65.00 132,213.88
130.00
1,321.50
650.40
350.00
1,876.17
5,593.31
3,085.44
279.98
675.00
100.00
285.00

65.00 132,213.88
130.00
1,321.50
650.40
350.00
4359 PREVENTATIVE MAINT

TELEPHONE SRV

MINOR EQUIP
SUPPLIES (K9)
PER D|EM 2t24t26-2t27 t26

STATE FIRE TRAINING CERT

IAFC ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP

CSO KIM JONES

CESAR CHAVEZ PARK

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
WATER DIVA.C.

TOMBSTONE PROJ. - TANK

ACO FREEZERS
40,581.68
39,271.93

32.32 79,853.61

32.32 Page: 3

Page 52 ends

apchkLst
0112612026 9:14:34AM
Bank
Gheck #
waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Date Vendor
FinalCheck List
City of Sanger
(Continued)
lnvoice Inv Date Description
LES SCHWAB T|RE 56400431525 1t12t2026 NEWTTRES (4\'23 NTSSAN 56400431092 1t8t2026 NEWTTRES'25 FORD UN|T
LESLIE'S POOLMART INC 00166-01-09169 11212026 PLANT CHEMICALS wPR9099427-00 8t18t2025 AQUATTCS - COUNry
LEXIS NEXIS COPLOGIC 1030003534 1213112025 ONLINE REPORTING SYST LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY 423805 111512026 HEAT SEAL
Page: 4
Amount Paid Check Total
96472
96473
96474
96475
96476
96477
96478
96479
96480
96481
96482
96483
96484
1126t2026
Voucher:
1126t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
10019
09489
12029
02317
12956
12550
06571
09920
06909
0081 1
11795
08962
303482
303839
303812
303908
3392743
33801 73
12312025
12t8t2025
12t16t2025
12t16t2025
12t1812025
12t31t2025
11t30t2025
12t31t2025
1,075.18
760.11
427.17
210.03
988.80

67.41 219.05
875.00
1,065.29
483.77
483.77

93.45 274,163.47
272,693.45
2,360.70
960.00
729.00
207.00
220.00
202.00
202.00
202.00
108.00
108.00

20.00 60.00

MARTINEZ, LINA

MCWLLIAMS, SOFIA

METRO UNIFORM &

MID VALLEY DISPOSAL
MIGHTY MART INC.

MINERAL KING

MIRELES, MARIA NATALI

MOORE TWNING
PER DIEM 1t16t2026 PER DIEM 2t5t26-2t6t26
REIMB 111012026 MCWLLIAMS. SYMPOSIUM
1,835.29
637.20
988.80

67.41 219.05
875.00
2,126.28
546,856.92
2,360.70
1,689.00
207.00
1,062.00

60.00 75.00

UNIF SUPPLIES (PD)
J. ALONSO BOOTS
M. FRIES BOOTS

UNIF SUPPLIES (PD)
DISPOSAL SRVS - DEC 2025
DISPOSAL SRVS - NOV 2025
FUEL. PD
720997
720745

PERDIEM
25'13290
2513291
2512932
2600046
2513292
2600278
2512942
REIMB
12t24t2025
12t24t2025
12t17t2025
1t2t2026
12t24t2025
1t8t2026
12t18t2025
1t16t2026
1t8t2026 PUBLTC NOTTCE- PH
12t18t2025 PUBLTC NOTTCE - TRACT 6531
1t21t2026 PER D|EM 2t22t26-2t26t26
\MA/TP/P ERM IT SAM PLI NG

INDUSTRYS / PERMIT

INDUSTRYS / PERMIT
\AAA'TP/ PERMIT SAMPLING
\MA/TP/PERM IT SAM PLI NG
GYM (DEC'2s-JAN'26)1t26t2026 12164
Voucher:
1t26t2026 12436
Voucher:

MUNOZ, BERTHA
96485 MV TRANSPORTATION 11252025 121912025 SENIOR CENTER FIELD TRIP 75.00 Page:4

Page 53 ends

apGhklst
0112612026 9:14:34AM
Bank: waap WESTAMERTCA BANK
Check # Date Vendor
96486 1t26t2026 07909
Voucher:
'U26t2026 03356
Voucher:

NFPA
96487
(Continued)

OFFICE DEPOT

OLSON, NATHAN

O'REILLYAUTO PARTS

PITTS, CRAIG
PMSI

PROFESSIONAL PRINT &

QUADIENT INC
lnv Date Description
1211912025 NFPA ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP
Page: 5
Amount Paid Check Total
225.00 225.00
FinalGheck List
City of Sanger
lnvoice
2757329
450482844001
453517566001
452125273001
453090605001
45345301 3001
450741704001
4521 83885001
450716044001

PERDIEM
2774-239627
2774-236795
2774-239600
2774-238854
2774-241241

PERDIEM
279453
279461
128191
128176
128251
128249
128248
6251 1 903
12130t2025
1t5t2026
12t15t2025
12119t2025
12t31t2025
1211712025
1t8t2026
12t18t2025
1120t2026
478.37
244.27
136.27
100.07

86.91 49.24

46.41 15.96
458.15
195.16
188.62

84.68 82.61

5.64 207.00
712.00
507.00
2,106.04
1,283.74
941.35
407.52
253.37
173.38
205.80
2,270.00
1,157.50
458.15
556.71
207.00
1,219.00
4,992.02
173.38
205.80
2,270.00

OFFICE SUPPLIES

SUPPLIES (PD)

OFFICE SUPPLIES

SUPPLIES (PD)

OFFICE SUPPLIES

OFFICE SUPPLIES - REC

SUPPLIES (PD)
OFFICE SUPPLIES. REC
PER Dt EM 2t 1 1 t26-2t 13t2696488
96489
96490
96491
96492
96493
96494
96495
112612026 12597
Voucher:
1t26t2026 08739
Voucher:
1t26t2026 06199
Voucher:
1t26t2026 10475
Voucher:
1t26t2026 03989
Voucher:
1t26t2026 09429
Voucher:
1t2612026 10823
Voucher:
1t26t2026 126s9
Voucher:
11512026 BATTERY FOR PARKS
1211812025 BATTERY FOR PREVENTION
11512026 MOTOR OIL FOR VEHICLES
1213112025 WPER BLADES
111312026 WPER FLUID AC TRUCK
1 t21 t2026 PER DIEM 2t22t26-2t26t26
1t2t2026
1t5t2026
111512026
1t20t2026
1fi9t2026
1t19t2026
1t9t2026
1t1t2026

CITY YARD OFFICE HVAC

CITY HALL PW HVAC REPAIR

INSD SNGR INSERTS
UTILIry BILLING SRVS - DEC

UB LATE NOTICES (JAN)

UB SHUT OFF NOTICES - JAN

INSERTS (SHUT OFF) - JAN

POSTAGE METER RENTAL

REYES, ROSA DEC
ROCKEEZ ENGINEERING'12-492A
1212312025 ZUMBA INSTRUCTOR
1213012025 R&M/ SLUDGE BED PIPING
Page:5

Page 54 ends

apchklst
0112612026 9:14:34AM
Bank: waap WESTAMERTCA BANK
Check# Date Vendor
96496 112612026 04766
Voucher:
(Continued)

SANCHEZ AUTO REPAIR

SANGER CHAMBER OF

SANGER GROCERY

SCA OF CA, LLC

SELF HELP

SELMA NISSAN

SEQUOIA COUNCIL
sEsAc rNc

SHUFFORD, STACY

SITEONE LANDSCAPE

SORELLISTAFFING

SOUTH CO VETERINARY
Page: 6
Amount Paid Gheck TotalInv Date Description

SMOG INSPECTION

PROF SERVICES-FEB
FinalGheck List
Gity of Sanger
lnvoice
1570
1574
1577
1 581
1590
1602
1624
1838
1546
1560
1557
1552
6214
SANADMOT25
SANADM1125
N1cs339106
11t24t2025
11t25t2025
11t25t2025
11t26t2025
12t1t2025
12t2t2025
12t8t2025
1112t2026
11t19t2025
1112012025
11t20t2025
11t20t2025
1t21t2026

39.75 39.75

39.75 39.75
6,666.67
1 009 1t7t2026 PET FOOD
2025-117000 11t30t2025 pWST SWEEP|NG - NOV
96497
96498
96499
96500
96501
96502
96503
96504
96505
96506
96507
1t26t2026
Voucher:
'U26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
00433
't2634
03531
09567
13028
09368
09507
1 3026
09290
13021
07309
500.17
8,064.00
903.50
865.50
429.98
100.00
1,278.00

30.00 897.76
5,290.54
378.00
295.00
166.00
477.00
6,666.67
500.17
8,064.00
1,769.00
429.98
100.00
1,278.00

30.00 897.76
5,290.54
839.00
SANADM (JUL 25)
SANADM (NOV 25)
VEHIC MAINT'23 NISSAN
1537
747443
6260
1t12t2026 2026 CHARTER FEE
12t31t2026 MUSTC LIC FEE
1213012025 YBB 14U PA|D 10.18.25
161714887-001 1t7t2026 HERBTCTDE LLMD
4 11912026 TEMP LABOR SRVS PE
DGT-3797
DGT-3773
DGT-3696
8t7t2025
12t9t2025
12t4t2025
1t8t2026
1n/2026
1t2t2026

EUTHANASIA

EUTHANASIA
Page:6

Page 55 ends

apchkLst
0112612026 9:14:34AM
Bank
Gheck #
waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Date Vendor
(Continued)

SUBURBAN PROPANE

SWANSON FAHRNEY

TARASCOU, GREG

TARGET SOLUTIONS

TELSTAR INSTRUMENTS

THE BRIEFING ROOM LLC

TMNS UNION RISK &

TREVINO, CYNTHIA

TREVINO, SANDRA

TRI-SIGNAL

TYLER TECHNOLOGIES

UNITED RENTALS

UNITY IT
Page: 7
Amount Paid Check Totat
2,799.30 2,799.30
lnv Date Description
1213012025 UTILIry/ PROPANE
FinalGheck List
City of Sanger
96508
96509
96510
9651 1
96512
96513
96514
96515
96516
96517
96518
96519
96520
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26r2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
11796
08757
05015
12167
12252
12770
09880
lnvoice
16170547079
256709
256824

PERDIEM
tNV134617
1 301 31
1498
62151-202511-1
62151-202510-1
62151-202512-1
REIMB

PERDIEM
c168654
1ni2026
1t5t2026
1t16t2026
1,444.91

94.10 175.00
2,400.00
9,480.10
1,467.06
179.45
144.65
116.25

90.00 449.05
1,430.00
7,700.00
1,400.00
1,400.00
700.00
2,762.04
6,317.18
1,919.67
384.49
239.76

21.44 32.00
1,539.01
175.00
2,400.00
9,480.10
1,467.06
440.35

90.00 449.05
1,430.00
11,200.00
2,762.04
8,882.54

32.00 VEHIC MAINT'25 FORD
VEHIC MAINT'25 FORD 5141
PER DtEM 5t5t26-5t8t26
211212026 MEMBERSHIP
11612026 R&M/ BLOWER BLDG NORTH
11812026 ONLINETRAINING
12t1t2025
11tlt2025
1t1t2026
1t9t2026

INVESTIGATIVE ACCESS

INVESTIGATIVE ACCESS
GYM (OCT/NOV/DEC)1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
10180
10592
08547
04091
1t16t2026 PER D|EM 5t5t26-5t8t26
1113012025 FIRE ALARM SVS (SYC)
045-549629
045-547603
045-548324
045548937
2561 8661 3-001
12t31t2025
12t10t2025
1211812025
12t23t2025
12t2t2025
TYLER TECHONOLOGIES :

TYLER TECHONOLOGIES :

W RI NG/LIGHTS/BOARDS/PAI1126t2026 04365
Voucher:
1t26t2026 08821
Voucher:
1t26t2026 09239
Voucher:
111984
1 1 1986
111985
111924
112053
82128
1t5t2026 rT SRVS - DEC
11512026 oFF|CE 365 - DEC
11512026 FIREWALL. DEC
1211612025 SSL RENEWAL
11512026 OVERHEAD PAGING SYSTEM
11112026 ALARM MONITOR - DEC96521 UNLIMITED
Page:7

Page 56 ends

apchklst
0112612026 9:{4:34AM
Bank : waap WESTAMERTCA BANK
Gheck# Date Vendor
(Continued)
lnvoice
UNWREDBROADBAND INVO26O9199
US BANK 6244
us BANK 7870662
7831 91 0
VALLEY SHREDDING 216512
216499
VIDEO INSPECTION 9991
9986
1 0005
WATER EDUCATION FOR 2025-143
XYLEMWATER 3556E02871
YBARRA, STEPHANIE 6272
ZWEIGLE SEPTIC 41378
42125
42109

PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC DEC
Page: 8
Amount Paid Check Total
259.99 259.99
29,368.19 29,368.19
lnv Date Description
1t30t2026 BROADBAND YRD (FEB)
1211512025 CAL CARD PMT
FinalGheck List
Gity of Sanger
96522
96523
96524
96525
96526
96527
96528
96529
96530
1232026
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1126t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
1t26t2026
Voucher:
10448
09303
12674
11840
01086
1t26t2026 13027
Voucher:
1t26t2026 13012
Voucher:
1t26t2026 12619
Voucher:
1t26t2026 04596
Voucher:
1t23t2026 02737
Voucher:
8t25t2025
7t25t2A25
12t31t2025
12t31t2025
12t18t2025
1211712025
12t31t2025
12t15t2025
BOND ADMIN FEES 25-26
BOND ADMIN FEES 25-26

DOC SHREDDING

R&M/ COLLECTION SYSTEM

R&M/ALLEY COLLECTION
R&M/ SSB 2 3W LEAK ON

FELLOWSHIP - COUNCIL MBR
3,025.00
2,500.00
135.00

45.00 5,250.00
2,825.00
2,220.75
3,500.00
5,525.00
180.00
10,295.75
3,500.00
32,264.44

30.00 700.00
195,547.19
1211112025 DIFFUSER FOR AERATION
1213012025 YBARRA-YBB 7U PAID
912712025 TOILET RENTAL/ NATIONAL
1t2t2026 TOTLET/HANDWASH (RANGE)
1212412025 R&M/ PORT-O-POTry MAINT
1213112025 GAS & ELECTRIC SRV
32,264.44

30.00 350.00
225.00
125.00
195,547.19
SubtotalforWESTAMER|CA BANK: 1,212,484.80
Page: 8

Page 57 ends

apChklst
0112612026 9:14:34AM
FinalCheck List
Gity of Sanger
Grand TotalAllGhecks:

Page: 9
1,212,484.80108 checks in this report.

Page: 9

Page 58 ends

apchklst
0112912026 9:55:58AM
Bank : waap WESTAMERICA BANK
Check # Date Vendor
Page:1
Amount Paid Check Totallnvoice

ACADEMYHARDWARE DEC
CA BLDG STANDARDS C( SB1473 ATR 4
DEPARTMENT OF CONSE SMIP QTR 4

SILVA'S OIL COMPANY IN( NOV
lnv Date Descriotion
12131 12025 HARDWARE/JAN ITORIAL SU F
1t23t2026 SB1473 ATR 4 2025
1t23t2026 SM|P QTR 42025
11t30t2025 GASOLTNE
FinalGheck List
Gity of Sanger
96531
96532
96533
96534
1t29t2026
Voucher:
1t29t2026
Voucher:
1t29t2026
Voucher:
1t29t2026
Voucher:
001 75
08352
00243
03709
1,728.35
1,238.50
3,968.74
13,550.12
1,728.35
1,238.50
3,968.74
13,550.12
20,485.71Sub total for WESTAMERICA BANK:

Page: 1

Page 59 ends

apchklst
0112912026 9:55:58AM
4 checks in this report.

FinalGheck List
Gity of Sanger
Page: 2
Grand TotalAll Ghecks: 20,485.71
Page:2

Page 60 ends

City of Sanger Fire Department
Greg Tarascou, Fire Chief
1700 7th Street • Sanger, CA 93657 • Phone (559) 875-6568 • Fax (559) 875-6611 February 12, 2026
To: Ho
norable Mayor and Council Members
Nathan Olson, City Manager
From: G
reg Tarascou, Fire Chief
RE: F

IRE DEPARTMENT REPORT FOR JANUARY
Fo
r the month of January there were 288 calls for services for ambulance services within our area and within surrounding areas. Crews were also dispatched to 544 requests for services in January for fire calls, including house fires, trash and warming fires, building fires, vehicle fires and unintentional or false alarm calls. This total equates to 332 calls in January, or just over 10 calls per day.

Chute
times are measured from the time the station is notified of an alarm to the time the unit goes enroute.

For the month of January our chute time was 77 seconds, just below our benchmark of 90 seconds.

Approximately 25% of the time our chute time was measured at less than 45 seconds. Our travel time is measured from the time the unit is enroute to the time that we arrive on scene. For January our median response time was 6 minutes, 44 seconds within the City. This is just over our benchmark of under 6 minutes within the City. Our total call time for the month of January for EMS calls was measured at one hour, 5 minutes per call.

The
Fire Department continued our recruitment efforts with our vacancies at single-role Paramedic and Firefighter. In January we opened the recruitment for Paramedic and moved one of our Non-Safety EMTs into a vacant Firefighter spot. We started the internal fire academy at the beginning of February and hope to finish by the beginning of March. In addition, we will be interviewing and testing for the vacant Paramedic spots in February with the hope of hiring by the end of May. Aside from the vacancies at the Non-Safety role, we are fully staffed on the suppression side.

Adm
inistratively our staff have started working on end-of-the-year reporting requirements and are looking forward to making mid-year adjustments. In addition, we started our State required inspections of our local schools and multi-family dwellings. We continued our education into the new Federal reporting system called NERIS and will look to start implementing other State-mandated programs into the Fire Department, including a system that tracks personnel qualifications and Fire Department resources at a State level.

I am alw
ays available if you have any questions.

E-4

Page 61 ends

1 SANGER POLICE DEPARTMENT
M
onthly Report
January 2026
John R
eynolds
Chief of Police
Su
mmary:

Self-initiated activity increased this month by 11% in response to several serious firearm / gang related incidents, reflecting a proactive posture. These efforts resulted in arrests and the recovery of evidence, with follow-up investigations ongoing. Traffic collisions remained consistent, with no fatal or DUI related collisions reported.

Cal
ls for Service:

Call Type Current
Month
Previous
Month
% Change
Total Calls 2594 2564 1%
Self-
Initiated
1074 964 11.4%
Cr
ime Statistics:

Crime Type Current Month Previous Month %
Change
Homicide 0 0 0%
Assault 7 7 0%
Robberies 0 0 0%
Burglaries 4 2 100%
Tr
affic Collisions:

Collision Type Current Month Previous Month Year to Date Percentage Change
Non-Injury 8 8 8 0%
Injury 4 4 4 0%
Fatal 0 0 0 0%
DUI Related 0 0 0 0%
E-5

Page 62 ends

2 Arrest and Citations:

Category Count
Felony Arrests 23
Misdemeanor
Arrests
19 DUI Arrests 3
Traffic Citations 73

Notable Incidents:

December 31. 2025-January 1, 2026
Officers responded to the 600 block of I St regarding an assault with a deadly weapon with gunshots fired. Upon arrival, officers located a male victim with gunshot wounds. The male victim was transported to Community Regional Medical Center for his injuries while officers and detectives searched the scene, collected evidence and interviewed numerous uncooperative persons. Three firearms were located during the investigation and detectives are conducting follow-up investigation.

January 4, 2026
Officers responded to multiple callers reporting shots fired around J St. and Edgar St. Officer determined that a late model white PT Cruiser with heavy set male fired ten (10) shots in the parking lot of 1410 J. St toward 3 adults and one juvenile before leaving the area.

Investigative leads were developed quickly, and detectives are conducting follow up investigations.

January 14, 2026
Officers were dispatched to the 1600 block of J St. regarding a brandishing of a firearm by suspect in a black Nissan. Officers spotted the vehicle, conducted a traffic stop and detained all the occupants. A replica firearm resembling a Glock handgun was located and suspect was arrested.

January 17, 2025
Officers were dispatched to the area of Jensen and Bethel for a report of possible shots fired.

Further information revealed that the brandishing of a firearm occurred at the Laundry Mat next to Grocery Outlet. The suspect had left the immediate area and was contacted by officers in the Walmart parking lot. He was found to be in possession of a replica firearm and had multiple warrants for his arrest. He was arrested, booked, and cited out.

January 23, 2026
Officers with the Sanger Police Department along with the Multi-Agency Gang Enforcement Consortium (MAGEC) served multiple search warrants throughout the city as a follow up to a gang related shooting that occurred in the 400 block of K St. in the evening hours of January 18 th. Four juvenile gang members were arrested, and evidence connected to the shooting was recovered.

Page 63 ends

3 January 25, 2026
Officers were dispatched to the 200 block of Academy Ave. for a report of a shots fired disturbance. While responding, another call was received regarding a stabbing in the 900 block of Sterling, and a short time later, the victim of a stabbing had been dropped off at the Sanger Fire Department. The disturbance was determined to be gang related. The victim was transported to the Community Regional Medical Center with non-life-threatening injuries.

Detectives working with the Multi-Agency Gang Enforcement Consortium have been conducting follow-up investigations. The incident drew media attention and involved Academy Ave. being shut down while evidence was searched for, located, and collected.

Personnel and Staffing:

• Officers Marissa Burkdoll and John Ayers successfully completed field training and began solo patrol duties.
• Current recruitments are active for Police Officer and Police Cadet Positions with four police officer vacancies.

Page 64 ends

Prepared by: Raymond Martin____ Approved by: _____________________

REVIEW: City Manager: ______ Finance: _______ City Attorney: ______ TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION _X__ Consent
____ Info Item
_X__ Action Item
____ Department Report
____ Redevelopment Agency

____ Public Hearing
____ Matter Initiated by a Council Member
____ Other
____ Continued to: __________

For the Meeting of: February 19, 2026
Agenda Item No.: E-6

CITY OF SANGER

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

To: Mayor and City Council M embers
From: Nathan Olson, City Manager
Subject: Receipt of Update on Emergency Repairs at Wastewater Treatment Plant Pursuant to Resolution No. 2026-04 and Request to Continue Declaration of Emergency
Attachments:

1. Resolution No. 2026-04 and Resolution No. 2026-11
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

None known.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommend that the City Council adopt Resolution 2026-11, Continuing the Declaration of Emergency in connection with Emergency Repairs at the Domestic/Industrial Treatment Facilities under Resolution 2026-04.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The purpose of this staff report is to provide an updated status on the emergency repairs initiated under the Determination of Emergency to address the Sanger Domestic/Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF). This report summarizes the progress made, challenges encountered, and financial implications of the ongoing repair efforts. Based on the status and projected needs, it is recommended to continue with emergency actions under Resolution No. 2026-04 to ensure timely and effective completion of the repairs.

Reports on actions taken and status of the emergency will continue to be made at each regular meeting of the City Council.

Page 65 ends

BACKGROUND:

• July 18, 2024: City Manager Nathan Olson (as the Director of Emergency Services) declared an emergency at the Sanger Domestic/Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility, requiring emergency repairs. Immediate emergency repairs were identified for the WWTF Digester, the Industrial/Domestic Headworks, and WWTF Bypass Pump. Reference Resolution 2024-48.
• August 2024: Repairs commenced, starting with the cleaning of the Digester, followed by work on the Industrial Headworks. The Digester was cleaned out, and its valves were replaced. • November 21, 2024: City Council reviewed and ratified agreements with Rockeez and VIS for work on the Industrial Headworks and cross-contamination emergency repairs. A new bypass pump was installed during this time to correct cross-contamination issues after the thickening clarifier. • December 2024: Repairs on the Industrial Headworks were completed, including epoxy coating, installation of a new line, concrete pit repairs, and valve replacements. Work immediately began on the Domestic Headworks.
• Early 2025: Domestic Headworks received attention due to debris buildup caused by a malfunctioning Bar Screen. The Bar Screen was under warranty; parts were ordered and fixed. • January 16, 2025 : City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency to address additional contracts required for completing emergency repairs. This renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-03. • March 20, 2025: City Council reviewed and ratified the agreement with Rockeez for Domestic Headworks repairs. Work began on the Primary Effluent Pump Chambers related to the clarifiers. • April 17, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency to address additional contracts required for completing emergency repairs. This renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-28. • April 17, 2025: Work on the Primary Effluent Pump Chambers was completed in early April. City Council reviewed and ratified the agreement with Rockeez for the Primary Effluent Pump Chambers. Reference Resolution 2025-29.
• May 15, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency to address additional contracts required for completing emergency repairs. This renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-35. • May 2025: Clarifiers are being prepped for their extensive rehab and epoxy coatings. Distribution box #7 was rehabbed and epoxied.
• June 2025: VIS spearheaded a free testing and demonstration of new sealant technology on the decayed lines of the Wastewater Treatment Facility to promising results. A contract with Telstar for Scada repairs and upgrades is in review.
• June 27, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency to address additional contracts required for completing emergency repairs and approved a budget amendment to the 2024/25 fiscal year appropriating $800,000 in funds for the Wastewater Treatment Facility emergency repairs . The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-43.
• July 17, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency to address additional contracts required for completing emergency repairs. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-55. • July/August 2025: Repairs are underway on Clarifier #2, which has also received extensive coating with Mainstay for enhanced durability. Preparations have begun for the Digester rehabilitation project, a comprehensive effort expected to span over 30 days. The scope includes mechanical repairs, replacement of

Page 66 ends

various pipes and valves, and application of Mainstay coating to the dome structure. Staff have been meeting with Telstar and are preparing to upgrade the SCADA system. • August 7, 2025: City Council approved the contract with Diamond Weld to construct a new Sludge Tank.

This addition is a key component of the broader Digester rehabilitation initiative. • August 21, 2025 : City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency to address additional contracts required for completing emergency repairs. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-70. • August 22, 2025: VIS has initiated cleaning operations on the digester in preparation for the upcoming rehabilitation project. Rockeez has placed orders for the necessary materials, and epoxy application to the digester dome is expected to last approximately five weeks, marking a key phase in completing the digester rehabilitation effort.
• September 4, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-72.
• September 18, 2025 : Diamond Weld Industries met with the City and went over scope to demolition the existing sludge tank and fabricate a new one on site. Work is scheduled to begin September 29,2025 and will last approximately 3 weeks. VIS finalized their cleaning operations of the Digester. Rockeez began the process of repairing and replacing piping, valves and gauges on the Digester as well as mobilizing for the Digester Dome rehab project. Clarifier #2 warranty work commenced and is scheduled for completion September 21 & 22, 2025. City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-75.
• September 19, 2025: Clarifier #2 was reinforced with a chicken wire concrete bottom and then Mainstay coating was applied. The Mainstay has cured, and the mechanicals components and arms will be reinstalled 9/23. Ongoing repair and replacing of piping, valves and gauges on the Digester. Several parts on order and completion date depended on the arrival of said parts.
• September 30, 2025: Clarifier #2 is back in service. The sludge tank is demolished, and materials are being brought for the onsite construction of the new tank to begin on 10/2. • October 2, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-79.
• October 13, 2025: Clarifier 2 was previously taken out of service for warranty repairs and is now back in service. Sludge Tank is complete and undergoing testing. Thickener Clarifier and Digester Dome rehabilitation are still on schedule for November 2025. • October 16, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-82.
• October 20, 2025: Contractor commenced scaffolding set up for Digester Dome Rehab and the Draining of Thickener Clarifier commenced, with sludge temporarily routed to the sludge drying beds. • November 4, 2025: Contractor commenced sandblasting of Digester in preparation for epoxy coating. The Thickener Clarifier is offline, and the mechanicals have been removed in preparation for sandblasting and epoxy. The mechanical components will need to be fabricated and repaired. • November 6, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-86.
• November 20, 2025: Scaffolding scheduled to be removed first week in December . Working to fix piping, gauges and meters. Working to get quotes for DAF, Roughing Filter and Clarifier 3.

Page 67 ends

• November 25, 2025: Scaffolding removed. Repairs to Digester still ongoing with parts on order. • December 2, 2025: Received quote for Thickener rebuild in stainless steel , $55,380.43. Repairing and replacing the skimmer arms, rakes and column with stainless steel extends the lifespan of these critical components. Stainless steel resists rust and chemical attack far better than carbon steel, especially in wastewater environments where exposure to moisture, sludge, and chemicals is constant. • December 4, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-89.
• December 2025: Digester columns repaired and dome is epoxy sealed. Repairs are underway for the valves, meters, cracked lines and plugged lines. SCADA PLC programming is complete, upgrade progress meeting set for January 8
th. Thickener Clarifier work continues.
• December 18, 2025: City Council renewed the proclamation of emergency. The renewal emphasized the necessity for continued immediate repairs without formal competitive requirements. Reference Resolution 2025-95.
• January 2026: VIS inspected Digester piping and found a significant portion is still usable, which will reduce the extra amount of repairs and additional cost needed to replace piping. Approximately 60% of the Thickener Clarifier project is completed.
• January 12, 2026: Telstar performed fiber optics terminations and is working with the City’s IT, Unity, to verify the fiber optics connections for the new PLC cutovers and system. PLC Cutover’s for PLC B and Industrial began 1/27/2026 and the next follow up meeting is scheduled for 2/3/2026. • January 29, 2026: Telstar has completed approximately 45% of the SCADA upgrades. Work is still expected to be completed by end of March 2026. Rockeez is custom fabricating parts for the Thickener Clarifier and staff are working to replace several broken valves. • February 2026: As work on the Digester is wrapping up, staff will be seeking an outside expert consultant to assistant in the start up of the Digester as well as train staff for proper use and maintenance. Staff are working to bring a contract and quote for the DAF unit repairs and coating.

Note: Due to the age and condition of existing infrastructure at the Wastewater Treatment Facility, additional deficiencies may be identified as work progresses. As such, all dates and milestones are subject to revision in response to emerging operational needs, safety considerations, or unforeseen complications.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

These emergency repairs are critical to ensure the protection of health, safety, and welfare of City residents and to protect the Wastewater Treatment Facilities. The City’s Domestic and Industrial Wastewater

Page 68 ends

Treatment Plant are still undergoing critical maintenance and repair. Remaining tasks include cleaning, inspecting, repairing, and applying new epoxy remaining clarifiers, the thickener, and the DAF unit coating and repairs, inspecting, repairing, and replacing the decayed lines leading from Headworks as well as refurbishing. Additionally, as repair and maintenance efforts progress, previously unanticipated deficiencies and infrastructure issues have continued to emerge, necessitating immediate attention to prevent further system degradation and ensure uninterrupted plant operations.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The exact fiscal impact is not fully known at this time as the work is being performed on a Time and Material basis due to the time sensitivity, but Staff will provide an updated budget for the project at further upcoming Council meetings.

Any additional costs for more repairs and materials will be brought back to City Council and addressed appropriately. The costs will be funded from Sewer Enterprise funds.

ALTERNATIVES:

No recommended alternatives. Until all repairs and maintenance are done, the Wastewater Treatment Plant remains non-compliant.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:

Per the Resolution, Staff will provide Council updates and seek ratification of any contracts at those meetings.

Page 69 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 70 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026.04

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER CONTINUING

THE DECLARATION PROCLAIMING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY

REGARDING THE SANGER DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY

AND THE INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
WHEREAS, the City of Sanger operates the Sanger Domestic Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility (hereafter "Domestic and Industrial Wastewater Facilities" ; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager to serve as the Director of Emergency Services issued a proclamation of local emergency for emergency repairs, which included (but is not limited to) the following: Digester repairs as needed after inspection; repairs as needed to the domestic headworks including epoxy coating to headwork; draining and inspection of all clarifiers; as well as repairing mechanical components and epoxy coating to clarifiers, and inspecting, repairing, and replacing the decayed lines leading from Headworks as well as refurbishing.; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved and renewed the Director of Emergency Services' determination on January 15,2026, pursuant to Resolution No. 2026-01 and, WHEREAS, the City Council has regularly received reports regarding the emergency and reviewed the need for continuing the local emergency and intended for the same; and WHEREAS, the City Manager requests that the City Council continue the declaration of a state of local emergency for the City as impacts regarding emergency repairs to the wastewater treatment facility continue to be evaluated, repaired, and or mitigated; and WHEREAS, the existing SCADA system needs upgrading, and the status of the needed repairs include cleaning, inspecting, repairing, and applying new epoxy to anaerobic digester including DAF Unit, clarifiers, the thickener, and, inspecting, repairing, and replacing the de-ayed lines leading from Headworks as well as refurbishing; and WHEREAS, there is a need to continue the emergency for purposes of procurement to ensure the City is able to procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes, without giving notice for bids to let contracts.

WHEREAS, the City Council desires to continue the duration of the declaration of emergency as there is a need for the same as set forth above.

NOW, THEREFORE the City Council resolves as follows:

Section 1. The recitals herein are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The City Council has reviewed the need for continuing the local emergency and finds that the state of emergency conditions related to the Domestic and Industrial Wastewater

Page 71 ends

Facilities are ongoing and are recognized as an imminent threat to our citizens. In accordance with Public Contracts Code Secti on 22050 and Sanger City Code Section 2-206 (h), the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health, or property. As such, the City Council extends and continues the declaration of a local emergency regarding the Domestic Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility.

Section 3. The emergency will not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation for bids, and that the action is necessary to respond to the emergency.

Section 4. Per Public Contract Code Section 22050 (c ) (1) the City Council shall review the emergency action at its next regularly scheduled meeting and at every regularly scheduled meeting thereafter until the action is terminated.

Section 5. This Resolution shall become effeotive upon adoption.

The foregoing Resolution was considered by the City Council for the City of Sanger at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 5th day of February 2026, and approved by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

GONZALEZ, MARTINEZ, HURTADO, MONTELONGO, MELENDEZ
l\l.J-t\,tr
NONE
NONE
a rmrdT_AI l-DDI:

Lina Martinez, City Clerk

Page 72 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-11

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANGER CONTINUING

THE DECLARATION PROCLAIMING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY

REGARDING THE SANGER DOMESTIC WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY

AND THE INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY

WHEREAS, the City of Sanger operates the Sanger Domestic Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility (hereafter “Domestic and Industrial Wastewater Facilities”); and

WHEREAS, the City Manager serves as the Director of Emergency Services and issued a proclamation of local emergency for emergency repairs, which included (but is not limited to) the following: Digester repairs as needed after inspection; repairs as needed to the domestic headworks including epoxy coating to headwork; draining and inspection of all clarifiers; as well as repairing mechanical components and epoxy coating to clarifiers, and inspecting, repairing, and replacing the decayed lines leading from Headworks as well as refurbishing.; and

WHEREAS, the City Council approved and renewed the Director of Emergency Services’ determination on February 5, 2026, pursuant to Resolution No. 2026-04; and

WHEREAS, the City Council has regularly received reports regarding the emergency and reviewed the need for continuing the local emergency and intended for the same; and

WHEREAS, the City Manager requests that the City Council continue the declaration of a state of local emergency for the City as impacts regarding emergency repairs to the wastewater treatment facility continue to be evaluated, repaired, and or mitigated; and

WHEREAS, the existing Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition ( SCADA) system needs upgrading, and the status of the needed repairs include cleaning, inspecting, repairing, and applying new epoxy to anaerobic digester including DAF Unit , clarifiers , the thickener, and, inspecting, repairing, and replacing the decayed lines leading from Headworks as well as refurbishing; and

WHEREAS, there is a need to continue the emergency for purposes of procurement to ensure the City is able to procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes, without giving notice for bids to let contracts.

WHEREAS, the City Council desires to continue the duration of the declaration of emergency as there is a need for the same as set forth above.

NOW, THEREFORE the City Council resolves as follows:

Section 1. The recitals herein are incorporated herein by reference.

Page 73 ends

Section 2. The City Council has reviewed the need for continuing the local emergency and finds that the state of emergency conditions related to the Domestic and Industrial Wastewater Facilities are ongoing and are recognized as an imminent threat to our citizens. In accordance with Public Contracts Code Section 22050 and Sanger City Code Section 2-206 (h), the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health, or property. As such, the City Council extends and continues the declaration of a local emergency regarding the Domestic and Industrial Wastewater Facility.

Section 3. T he emergency will not permit a delay resulting from a competitive solicitation for bids, and that the action is necessary to respond to the emergency.

Section 4. Per Public Contract Code Section 22050(c)(1) the City Council shall review the emergency action at its next regularly scheduled meeting and at every regularly scheduled meeting thereafter until the action is terminated.

Section 5. This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption.

The foregoing Resolution was considered by the City Council for the City of Sanger at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 19
th day of February 2026, and approved by the
following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

ATTEST:

Lina Martinez, City Clerk

Page 74 ends

Prepared by: Esperanza Rosales____ Approved by: __Esperanza Rosales_________________

REVIEW: City Manager: ______ Finance: _______ City Attorney: ______ TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO
ACTION
_X__ Consent
____ Info Item
_X__ Action Item
____ Department Report
____ Redevelopment Agency

____ Public Hearing
____ Matter Initiated by a Council Member
____ Other
____ Continued to: __________

For the Meeting of: February 19 , 2026
Agenda Item No.: E-7

CITY OF SANGER

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

To: Mayor and City Council
From: Esperanza Rosales, Public Works Director
Subject: Authorization for Out of State Travel – Water Operations Manager

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None known.

ECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend that the City Council authorize out of state travel for Water Operations Manager to attend the California Rural Water Association (CRWA) Education and Exhibitor Expo in South Lake Tahoe, Nevada from April 27 – 30, 2026.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The CRWA Expo is a premier event for water and wastewater professionals, providing essential technical training, regulatory updates, and exposure to new industry technologies. For the Water Operations Manager, this conference offers a specialized platform to engage with state and federal regulators and industry peers to ensure Sanger’s water infrastructure remains compliant and efficient.

BACKGROUND
The California Rural Water Association is dedicated to supporting small to medium-sized water and wastewater systems through specialized training and legislative advocacy. Their annual Expo serves as a critical hub for continuing education units (CEUs) required for state certifications and offers workshops on the latest advancements in water quality management and infrastructure sustainability.

Page 75 ends

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
Authorizing the Water Operations Manager’s attendance provides several key benefits to the City:
• Ability to earn required contact hours to maintain state mandated water distribution and treatment certifications.
• Provides direct access to sessions regarding upcoming changes in State Water Resources Control Board regulations, ensuring the City remains proactive in its compliance efforts. • The exhibition portion of the conference allows for the evaluation of new technologies in leak detection, meter reading, and SCADA systems, which can lead to long-term cost savings for the City’s utility operations.
• Collaboration with managers from similar municipalities for the exchange of best practices regarding drought management and infrastructure aging.

ISCAL IMPACT
The total estimated fiscal impact for this travel is $1,800, which includes registration fees, lodging, meals, and transportation. Sufficient funds have been budgeted and are currently available in the FY 2025-2026 Water Enterprise Fund.

LTERNATIVES
The City Council could choose not to authorize the travel; however, this may require the Water Operations Manager to seek alternative opportunities.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
The Public Works Department will confirm registration, travel arrangements, and lodging accommodations.

Page 76 ends

Prepared by: _Shaffer Fluetsch _ Approved by: __Esperanza Rosales________________

REVIEW: City Manager: ______ Finance: _______ City Attorney: ______ TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION _X _ Consent
____ Info Item
_X__ Action Item
____ Department Report
____ Redevelopment Agency

____ Public Hearing
____ Matter Initiated by a Council Member
____ Other
____ Continued to: __________

For the Meeting of: February 19, 2026
Agenda Item No.: E-8

CITY OF SANGER

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Shaffer Fluetsch, Management Analyst
Subject: Water Valve Assessment Project
Attachments: 1) Agreement
2) Memo
3) Quote Comparison

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

None known.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Specialized Utility Services Program (SUSP) for the Water Valve Assessment Project in an amount not to exceed $95,000, and find that the award of the same is in compliance with the City’s purchasing policies for the reasons set forth herein, and is in the best interests of the City.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

Staff requests that the City Council approve agreement with Specialized Utility Services Program (SUSP) to assess the mapping, condition, and functionality of 200 high priority water valves. Based on the number of hours that the consultant estimates it will take to perform the assessment, the city estimates the assessment will cost approximately $80,350 with the clause that the total project cost does not exceed $95,000. Fund for this project are currently appropriated in the FY 2025/26 in the Water Enterprise Fund.

BACKGROUND:

Page 77 ends

Having carefully chosen water valves assessed is a strategic investment that will enhance the efficiency of our operations, provide a safer working environment for our staff , and will create a more reliable infrastructure within our water distribution system.

Staff researched and held meetings with several contractors including Specialized Utility Services Program (SUSP), ME Simpson, and Valve Kings to ascertain if they had the ability to perform the scope of work the City of Sanger requires on this project. Public Works staff meticulously evaluated the information and proposals each contractor presented; and after reviewing cost, staffing and equipment to be used, and the ability to effectively perform the necessary scope of work, it is recommended that SUSP is the best choice for the City and our team.

Staff obtained quotes from different contractors in order to compare who could provide the best value to the City of Sanger. Items considered when evaluating the total cost of the project were the number of days the project would take, the number of staff that would be provided for the project, and if there were any mobilization fees involved.

SUSP is going to provide a minimum of four operators and one GIS technical specialist for the water valve assessment project. The scope of services includes:

• Exercising and documenting valves within the boundaries predetermined by the City • Providing the City with a complete GIS map and updating city plats with accurate valve locations • Providing detailed notes about the condition of each valve • Documenting shutdown capabilities and identifying areas where isolation is currently unachievable. • Preparing a corrective action plan based on assessment findings.

In many high-priority areas of the City, achieving a water shutdown is currently difficult or impossible due to aged infrastructure, missing valves, or inaccurate mapping. When a valve fails to isolate an area, staff must seek out more distant valves, oft en repeating the process several times. This creates issues such as extended downtime, increased labor hours, and delays in repairs.

Reliable valve isolation is essential not only for emergency maintenance but also to support City growth as we currently have numerous street Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Projects and Private Developer Projects that depend on this system’s reliability to stay on schedule and within budget.

By doing this assessment, we will provide staff with a more functional distribution system, and the project will greatly enhance the capabilities of the Public Works Department and provide improvements to our water valve inventory.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

Currently, City staff must rely on a system of water valves that cannot always provide a reliable water shutdown greatly reducing operating efficiency and the ability to perform inspections or make repairs. By investing in this assessment, we can greatly increase our efficiency and create a safer working environment for our staff.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The FY2025/26 budget has existing appropriations in the Water Division Enterprise Fund, account #611-

Page 78 ends

070-401-7205, for the water valve assessment project. The total cost of the project is not to exceed $95,000.

ALTERNATIVES:

Do not approve the project. Staff will continue working with valves that aren’t fully functional and maps that aren’t up-to-date.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:

Once approved the City Manager will sign the agreement on behalf of the City, and the project can then commence in April 2026. The project is expected to be completed by the end of the 2026 fiscal year (June 30, 2026).

Page 79 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 80 ends

01484.0021 2089486.1 1

CITY OF SANGER

CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT

This Consultant Services Agreement ("Agreement”) is en tered into between the C ITY OF SANGER, a California general law city (“City”) and SPECIALIZED UTILITY SERVICES PROGRAM, INC. ("Consultant”). This A greement shall be effective on the date signed by City which shall occur after execution by Consultant (“Effective Date”).

RECITALS

A. City desires to ensure its water system is in working order, especially in high-priority areas of the City where achieving a water shutdown is currently difficult or impossible due to aged infrastructure, missing valves, or inaccurate mapping. As part of this purpose, the City desires to have assessments performed for key locations as identified by the City.

B. Consultant is engaged in the business of furnishing such services as a consultant and warrants and represents that it is qualified, licensed, and professionally capable of performing the Services called for in this Agreement.

C. City has selected Consultant to perform the requested Scope of S ervices on the basis of Consultant's demonstrated competence and professional qualifications.

D. City desires to retain Consultant, and Consultant desires to provide City with the Services, on the terms and conditions as set forth in this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual agreements herein, City and Consultant agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services . Consultant shall perform , to the satisfaction of City in accordance with this Agreement, the Services described in the “S cope of Services ” set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, and as may be revised by mutual agreement of the parties. Consultant warrants that it is qualified to perform the Services under this Agreement.

Consultant shall be familiar with and shall comply with all State and Federal laws and regulations applicable to the work to be performed under this Agreement.

2. Commencement of Services; Term of Agreement . Consultant shall commence the Services upon City’s issuance of a written "Notice to Proceed" and shall continue with the Services until Consultant, as determined by City, has satisfactorily performed and completed the Services, or until such time as the Agreement is terminated by either party in accordance with this Agreement, whichever is earlier.

(a) Continuity of Personnel. Consultant shall make every reasonable effort to maintain the stability and continuity of Consultant's staff and subcontractors assigned to perform the Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall notify City of any changes in Consultant's staff and subcontractors assigned to perform the Services under this Agreement.

Page 81 ends

01484.0021 2089486.1 2

(b) Additional Services. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to or outside of those set forth in this Agreement or listed in Exhibit "A," unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager of City. Consultant shall be compensated for any such additional services in the amounts and in the manner agreed to by the City and Consultant.

3. Compensation for Services. City shall compensate C onsultant for rendering the Services as follows:

(a) Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant per one invoice. Both parties agree that Consultant’s proposal to complete the Services is not to exceed ninety five thousand dollars and no cents ($95,000) and that the Services are anticipated to be completed by June 30, 2026.

(b) Each month Consultant shall invoice City for all work performed and expenses incurred during the preceding month. The invoice shall detail charges by the following categories: labor (by subcategory), travel, materials, equipment, supplies, and sub-consultant contracts.

(c) City shall independently review each invoice submitted by the Consultant to determine whether the work performed and expenses incurred are in compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. The invoiced amount shall be paid within 30 calendar days unless City disputes any charges or expenses. If any charges or expenses are disputed, City shall pay the undisputed amount and notify Consultant of the nature and amount of the disputed charge or expense. The parties shall seek to resolve the disputed items(s) by mutual agreement.

4. Independent Contractor Status. Consultant and its subcontractors shall perform the Services as independent contractors and not as officers, employees, agents or volunteers of City. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to create any contractual relationship between City and Consultant’s employees or subcontractors, nor shall anything contained in this Agreement be deemed to give any third party, including but not limited to Consultant’s employees or subcontractors, any claim or right of action against City.

5. Standard of Care. Consultant represents and warrants that it has the qualifications, experience and facilities necessary to properly perform the services required under this Agreement in a thorough, competent and professional manner. Consultant shall at all times faithfully , competently and to the best of its ability, experience and talent, perform all services described herein. In meeting its obligations under this Agreement, Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing services similar to those required of Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant represents that to the extent Consultant utilizes subcontractors, such subcontractors are, and will be, qualified in their fields. Consultant also expressly represents that both Consultant and its subcontractors, if any, are now, and will be throughout their performance of the Services under this Agreement, properly licensed or otherwise qualified and authorized to perform the Services required and contemplated by this Agreement.

Consultant and its subcontractors, if any, shall utilize the standard of care and skill customarily exercised by members of their profession, shall use reasonable diligence and best judgment while performing the Services, and shall comply with and keep themselves informed of all applicable laws and regulations.

Page 82 ends

01484.0021 2089486.1 3

6. Identity of Subcontractors and Sub-Consultants . Consultant shall, before commencing any work under this Agreement, provide to City in writing: (a) the identity of all subcontractors and sub-consultants (collectively referred to as "subcontractors"), if any, Consultant intends to utilize in Consultant's performance of this Agreement; and (b) a detailed description of the full scope of work to be provided by such subcontractors. Consultant shall only employ subcontractors pre-approved by City and in no event shall Consultant replace an approved subcontractor without the advance written permission of City, with the understanding that City’s permission will not be unreasonably withheld.

Notwithstanding any other provisions in this Agreement, Consultant shall be liable to City for the performance of Consultant's subcontractors.

7. Subcontractor Provisions . Consultant shall include in its written agreements with its subcontractors, if any, provisions which: (a) impose upon the subcontractors the obligation to provide to City the same insurance and indemnity obligations that Consultant owes to City; (b) make clear that City intends to rely upon the reports, opinions, conclusions and other work product prepared and performed by subcontractors for Consultant ; and (c) entitle City to impose upon subcontractors the assignment rights found elsewhere in this Agreement.

8. Power to Act on Behalf of City. Consultant shall not have any right, power, or authority to create any obligation, express or implied, or make representations on behalf of City except as may be expressly authorized in advance in writing from time to time by City and then only to the extent of such authorization.

9. Record Keeping; Reports. Consultant shall keep complete records showing the type of Services performed. Consultant shall be responsible and shall require its subcontractors to keep similar records. City shall be given reasonable access to the records of Consultant and its subcontractors for inspection and audit purposes. Consultant shall provide City with a working draft of all reports and five (5) copies of all final reports prepared by Consultant under this Agreement.

10. Ownership and Inspection of Documents. A ll data, tests, reports, documents, conclusions, opinions, recommendations and other work product generated by or produced for Consultant or its subcontractors in connection with the Services, regardless of the medium, including physical drawings and materials recorded on computer discs (“Work Product”), shall be and remain the property of City. City shall have the right to use, copy, modify, and reuse the Work Product as it sees fit. Upon City’s request, Consultant shall make available for inspection and copying all such Work Product and all Work P roduct shall be turned over to City promptly at City’s request or upon termination of this Agreement, whichever occurs first. Consultant shall not release any Work Product to third parties without prior written approval of the City Manager. This obligation shall survive termination of this Agreement and shall survive for four (4) years from the date of expiration or termination of this Agreement.

11. Confidentiality. All data, reports, conclusions, opinions, recommendations and other work product prepared and performed by and on behalf of Consultant in connection with the Services performed pursuant to this Agreement shall be kept confidential and shall be disclosed only to City, unless otherwise provided by law or expressly authorized by City. Consultant shall not disclose or permit the disclosure of any confidential information acquired during performance of the Services , except to its agents, employees, affiliates, and subcontractors who need such confidential information

Page 83 ends

01484.0021 2089486.1 4
in order to properly perform their duties relative to this Agreement. Consultant shall also require its subcontractors to be bound to these confidentiality provisions.

12. City Name and Logo. Consultant shall not use City’s name or insignia, photographs relating to the City projects for which Consultant’s services are rendered, or any publicity pertaining to the Consultant’s services under this Agreement in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.

13. Conflicts of Interest. Consultant warrants that neither Consultant nor any of its employees have an interest, present or contemplated, in the Services. Consultant further warrants that neither Consultant nor any of its employees have real property, business interests or income that will be affected by the Services. Consultant covenants that no person having any such interest, whether an employee or subcontractor shall perform the Services under this Agreement. During the performance of the Services, Consultant shall not employ or retain the services of any person who is employed by the City or a member of any City Board or Commission. City understands and acknowledges that Consultant is, as of the date of execution of this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of non-related services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Consultant is unaware of any stated position of City relative to such projects. Any future position of City on such projects shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section. City understands and acknowledges that Consultant will, perform non- related services for other governmental agencies and private parties following the completion of the Services under this Agreement, and any such future service shall not be considered a conflict of interest for purposes of this section.

14. Non-liability of Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant, or any successors in interest, in the event of a default or breach by City for any amount which may become due Consultant or its successor, or for any breach of any obligation under the terms of this Agreement.

15. City Right to Employ Other Consultants. This Agreement is non- exclusive with Consultant.

City reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with the Services.

16. T ermination of Agreement. This Agreement shall terminate upon completion of the Services, or earlier pursuant to the following.

a.. Termination by City: Without Cause. This Agreement may be terminated by City at its discretion upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to Consultant.

b. Termination by City or Consultant: For Cause . Either party may terminate this Agreement upon twenty (20) days prior written notice to the other party of a material breach, and a failure to cure within that time period.

c. Compensation to Consultant Upon Termination. In the event termination is not due to fault attributable to Consultant and provided all other conditions for payment have been met, Consultant shall be paid compensation for services performed prior to notice of termination. As to any phase partially performed but for which the applicable portion of Consultant's compensation has not become due, Consultant shall be paid the reasonable value of its services provided. However, in

Page 84 ends

01484.0021 2089486.1 5
no event shall such payment when added to any other payment due under the applicable part of the work exceed the total compensation of such part as specified in Section 3 herein . In the event of termination due to Consultant’s failure to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of City, City may withhold an amount that would otherwise be payable as an offset to City's damages caused by such failure.

d. Effect of Termination . Upon receipt of a termination notice (or completion of this Agreement), Consultant shall: (i) promptly discontinue all Services affected (unless the notice directs otherwise); and (ii) deliver or otherwise make available to the City, without additional compensation, all data, documents, procedures, reports, estimates, summaries, and such other information and materials as may have been accumulated by the Consultant in performin g this Agreement, whether completed or in process. Following the termination of this Agreement for any reason whatsoever, City shall have the right to utilize such information and other documents, or any other works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to physical drawings, data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer disks, or other writings prepared or caused to be prepared under this Agreement by Consultant. Consultant may not refuse to provide such writings or materials for any reason whatsoever.

17. Insurance . Consultant shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. All insurance policies shall be subject to City approval as to form and content.

Consultant shall provide City with copies of required certificates of insurance upon request.

18. Indemnity and Defense. Consultant hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers harmless from and against all claims, demands, causes of action, actions, damages, losses, expenses, and other liabilities, (including without limitation reasonable attorney fees and costs of litigation) of every nature arising out of the acts, errors, or omissions constituting negligence, gross negligence, willful misconduct or fraud of Consultant or its subcontractors relating to the performance of Services described herein. Consultant's duty to defend and indemnify City shall not extend to injuries or damages that are the result of City's sole negligence or willful misconduct.

Consultant’s duty to defend shall immediately arise when a claim is asserted and/or a lawsuit is initiated against the City arising out of or occurring in connection with the acts, errors, or omissions constituting negligence, gross negligence, fraud or willful misconduct of Consultant or its subcontractors relating to the performance of Services described herein and regardless of whether others may owe the City a duty of defense and/or indemnity. Consultant and City agree that said indemnity and defense obligations shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement for any items specified herein that arose or occurred during the term of this Agreement for a period of two (2) years.

19. Assignment . Neither this Agreement nor any duties or obligations hereunder shall be assignable by Consultant without the prior written consent of City. In the event of an assignment to which City has consented, the assignee shall agree in writing to personally assume and perform the covenants, obligations, and agreements herein contained. In addition, Consultant shall not assign the payment of any monies due Consultant from City under the terms of this Agreement to any other

Page 85 ends

01484.0021 2089486.1 6
individual, corporation or entity. City retains the right to pay any and all monies due Consultant directly to Consultant.

20. Form and Service of Notices . All notices required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, addressed as follows:

To City: Public Works Department To Consultant: Dan DeMoss City of Sanger Specialized Utility Services Program 1700 7
th Street 1234 North Market Blvd
Sanger, CA 93637 Sacramento, CA 95834

Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or transmitted by facsimile, or if mailed, three
(3) days after deposit of the same in the custody of the United States Postal Service.

21. Entire Agreement. This Agreement , including the attachments , represents the entire Agreement between City and Consultant and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral with respect to the subject matter herein. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both City and Consultant.

22. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.

23. Authority. The signatories to this Agreement warrant and represent that they have the legal right, power, and authority to execute this Agreement and bind their respective entities.

24. Severability. In the event any term or provision of this Agreement is declared to be invalid or illegal for any reason, this Agreement will remain in full force and effect and will be interpreted as though such invalid or illegal provision were not a part of this Agreement. The remaining provisions will be construed to preserve the intent and purpose of this Agreement and the parties will negotiate in good faith to modify any invalidated provisions to preserve each party’s anticipated benefits.

25. Applicable Law and Interpretation and Venue . This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall, in all cases, be construed as a whole, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against either party. This Agreement is entered into by City and Consultant in the County of Fresno, California.

Consultant shall perform the Services required under this Agreement in the County of Fresno, California. Thus, in the event of litigation, venue shall only lie with the appropriate state or federal court in Fresno County.

26. Attorneys Fees. If either party is required to commence any proceeding or legal action to enforce or interpret any term, covenant, or condition of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such proceeding or action shall be entitled to recover from the other party its reasonable attorneys’ fees and legal expenses.

27. Amendments and Waiver. This Agreement shall not be modified or amended in any way, and no provision shall be waived, except in writing signed by the parties hereto. No waiver of any

Page 86 ends

01484.0021 2089486.1 7
provision of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provision. Failure of either party to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of the right to compel enforcement of the remaining provisions of this Agreement.

28. Third Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to confer any rights upon any party not a signatory to this Agreement.

29. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts such that the signatures may appear on separate signature pages. A copy or an original, with all signatures appended together, shall be deemed a fully executed Agreement.

30. Non-Discrimination. Consultant shall not discriminate on the basis of any protect ed class under federal or State law in the provision of the Services or with respect to any Consultant employees or applicants for employment. Consultant shall ensure that any subcontractors are bound to this provision. A protected class, includes, but is not necessarily limited to race, color, national origin, ancestry, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, and disability.

31. Compliance with All Laws . In providing the services required under this Agreement, Consultant shall at all times comply with all applicable laws of the United States, the State of California, and with all applicable regulations promulgated by federal, state, regional, or local administrative and regulatory agencies, now in force and as they may be enacted, issued, or amended during the term of this Agreement.

Now, therefore, the City and Consultant have executed this Agreement on the date(s) set forth below.

SPECIALIZED UTILITY SERVICES CITY OF SANGER
PROGRAM, INC.

By:___________________________ By:______________________________ Name & Title: __________________ Nathan Olson, City Manager

Date: __________________ Date: __________________

Page 87 ends

01484.0021 2089486.1 8

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

Consultant will provide four operators and one technical specialist to perform the following work for City:

a. Consultant will exercise and document valves located with the boundaries predetermined by the City.

b. Consultant will provde the City with a complete GIS map as well as update the City Plats with accurate valve locations.

c. Consultant will include notes about the condition of each valve.

d. Consultant will verify valve shutdowns or lack thereof if there is no shutdown.

Consultant will document how to get proper isolation with each valve.

e. Consultant will provide the City with a Corrective Action Plan Outlining the findings of the assessment.

The Parties anticipate the scope of work will require 150 hours of work onsite, as well as 20 hours of GIS/Mapping and reporting (20-30 hours if current adapting current GIS mapping in ESRI).

Consultant shall provide the services at the following rates, not to exceed the total compensation authorized by this agreement:

Operator Grades 1-2 $95.00/hr./operator
Travel Travel to the site location will be
charged at $95.00/hr./operator
GIS/Mapping work and Corrective
Action Plan
$145.00 per hour

Page 88 ends

01484.0021 2089486.1 9

EXHIBIT B

INSURANCE
A. Insurance Requirements

i. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office form CG 00 01, in an amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage, including without limitation, blanket contractual liability. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. Consultant’s general liability policies shall be endorsed using Insurance Services Office form CG 20 10 (or equivalent) to provide that City and its officers, officials, employees, and agents shall be additional insureds under such policies. For construction projects, an endorsement providing completed operations coverage for the additional insured, ISO form CG 20 37 (or equivalent), is also required.
ii. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies by Consultant shall not affect coverage provided by the City.
iii. Coverage shall state that Consultant insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respects to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
iv. Coverage shall contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City.

B. Business Automobile Liability

i. Consultant shall provide auto liability coverage for owned, non-owned, and hired autos using ISP Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 (or equivalent) with a limit of no less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per accident.

C. Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability

i. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance (Statutory Limits) and Employers’ Liability Insurance with limits of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000).

Consultant shall submit to City, along with the certificate of insurance, a waiver of subrogation endorsement in favor of City, its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers.

D. All Coverages

i. Each insurance policy required by the agreement shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled, or reduced in limits except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice has been given to the City, except that ten (10) days’ prior written notice shall apply in the event of cancellation for nonpayment of premium. ii. All self-insurance, self-insured retentions, and deductibles must be declared and approved by the City.
iii. Evidence of Insurance – Prior to commencement of work, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates, additional insured endorsements, and waivers of subrogation evidencing compliance with the insurance requirements above. The Consultant

Page 89 ends

01484.0021 2089486.1 10
must agree to provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies of requested by the City.
iv. Acceptability of Insurers – Insurance shall be placed with insurers admitted in the State of California with an AM Best rating of A- VII or higher.

Page 90 ends

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 91 ends

MEMORANDUM

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ESPERANZA ROSALES – PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR

Date: February 3, 2026

To: Esperanza Rosales, Public Works Director

From: Shaffer Fluetsch, Public Works Management Analyst

Subject: Water Valve Assessment Project

Please let this memo serve as justification for only using two proposals when deciding which vendor presents the best value for the water valve assessment project. Staff researched a number of companies to determine if they had the ability to perform the scope of work the city is wanting to complete. Companies such as McMor and IWater informed us they wouldn’t be able to perform the work required. Hydromax doesn’t work in California, and Wachs Utility Products informed us that they only manufacture and don’t perform any services.

After an exhaustive search, we were able to obtain three qualified candidates: Valve King, ME Simpson, and SUSP. ME Simpson and SUSP were able to provide the city their proposals; however, after many attempts to get a proposal from Valve King unsuccessfully.

Given the specialized nature of the work and lack of other viable service providers in the region, these two submissions represent a competitive environment sufficient to determine “best value” for the City. Proceeding at this time ensures the project remains on schedule and the city’s water infrastructure receives necessary assessment without further administrative delay.

Page 92 ends

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 93 ends

2/11/2026
City of Sanger
Quote Comparison
Quote #1 Quote #2 Quote #3
Contractor Name: SUSP ME Simpson Valve King USA
Address: 1234 North Market Blvd 3406 Enterprise Ave 6352 Industry Way City, St, Zip: Sacramento, CA 95834 Valparaiso, IN 46383 Westminster, CA 92683 Phone: 916-553-4900 800-255-1521 310-714-1308
Item Description Quote #1 Quote #2 Quote #3
4 person crew 76,000.00$
2 person crew 75,000.00$
GIS staff 4,350.00$
Sub Total 80,350.00$ 75,000.00$ -$ Options
Report fee 4,000.00$
Mobilization 16,400.00$

Sub Total of Options 20,400.00$
GRAND TOTAL 80,350.00$ 95,400.00$ -$ Quote Date 11/18/2025 11/3/2025
Lead Time
Approximate Start Date 4/1/2025
Approximate Completion Date 5/5/2025
Quote Valid until
NOTES: Costs based on four
workers onsite for 150
hours and one GIS staff
working for 30 hours.

Costs based on two
workers onsite for
approximately 20 days.

Proposal never
submitted.

Page 94 ends

1234 North Market Blvd.

Sacramento, CA 95834
toll-free: 800.833.0322
phone: 916.553.4900
fax: 916.553.4904
www.suspinc.org
City of Sanger
Water Valve Assessment Services
November 18, 2025

1. Scope of Services

2. Pr
ice Proposal

3. Su
mmary Proposal

Page 95 ends

1. Scope of Services
General Services – Specialized Utility Services Program, Inc. (SUSP) was requested to provide a proposal for water valve assessment services in the central part of the City of Sanger (City). SUSP will provide a minimum of four (4) operators and one (1) technical special ist to conduct the following scope.

a. SUSP will exercise and document valves located within the boundaries predetermined by the City.
b. SUSP will provide the City with a complete GIS map as well as update the City Plats with accurate valve locations
c. SUSP will include notes about the condition of each valve. d. SUSP will verify valve shutdowns or lack thereof if there is no shutdown. SUSP will document how to get proper isolation with each valve.
e. SUSP will provide the City with a Corrective Action Plan outlining the findings of the assessment.

2. Price Proposal
SUSP will provide the General Services outlined in Section 1 – Scope of Services, under contract.

This fee is payable within 30 days of receipt of the SUSP invoice for services provided. SUSP anticipates 150 hours of onsite, as well as 20 hours of GIS/Mapping and reporting.

Operator Grades 1-2 $95.00/hr./operator
Travel Travel to the site location will be charged at
the above-listed price.

GIS/Mapping work and
Corrective Action Plan
$145.00 per hour
SUSP engineering estimates 20-30 hours
minimum if we adapt current GIS mapping
in ESRI.

3. Proposal Summary
We are flexible in providing services, so please feel free to discuss any aspect of this price proposal with us for clarification. Upon signing , you agree to the terms outlined in this proposal. This proposal will act as formal consent for SUSP to facilitate the services listed under Section 1. If you have any questions or wish to discuss this proposal, please contact Fernando Saenz, SUSP Operations Manager, [email protected], or Dan DeMoss, SUSP and California Rural Water Association Executive Director, [email protected].

Page 96 ends

Su
bmitted by:
______
__________________________
Dan DeMoss, Executive Director Date
Specialized Utility Services Program, Inc.

Ac
cepted by:
______
__________________________ ________________
Signature Date
______
__________________________
Print Name
______
__________________________
Title
11/18/2025

Page 97 ends

November 3, 2025

Mr. Shaffer Fluetsch
Management Analyst
City of Sanger
1700 7th St
Sanger, CA 93657-2804

RE: PROPOSAL FOR A VALVE ASSESSMENT AND EXERCISING PROGRAM

Dear Mr. Fluetsch,

M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. is delighted to present our proposal to the City of Sanger, CA for a Water Distribution System Valve Assessment and Exercising Program. We feel privileged to be considered for this endeavor and are confident that our team will contribute to the success of the project.

As a Professional Services Firm, our primary focus is on developing and delivering programs and services that optimize the performance of our clients' water distribution systems. Many of these programs are recognized globally as Best Management Practices (BMPs) for utilities. We take pride in providing robust solutions through the utilization of top-tier technical and professional services, leveraging state-of-the-art technology, and employing a highly skilled and well-trained staff of professionals. Our team of educated engineers and technical experts is fully dedicated to the success of this project and ready to alleviate the burden on your staff, ensuring a seamless continuation of services.

Our services have been meticulously developed and refined to cater to the specific needs of utilities.

Whether it's offering comprehensive turn-key solutions or assisting in the development of in-house programs, M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. strives to fulfill one overarching goal: to instill public confidence by ensuring the safety and quality of drinking water.

We sincerely appreciate your consideration and the opportunity to introduce our valve assessment services through this proposal. We are committed to surpassing your expectations and delivering exceptional results.

Sincerely,

Michael Simpson
CEO

3406 Enterprise Avenue
Valparaiso, IN 46383

800.255.1521 P
888.531.2444 F

[email protected]

Page 98 ends

M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. | Valve Assessment Program

S C O P E O F S E R V I C E S
Valve Assessment and Exercising Program
At M.E. Simpson Co., Inc., our Valve Assessment and Exercising Program is designed to help utilities ensure the operability, accuracy, and reliability of critical valve assets across their water distribution systems.

Much like other buried infrastructure, water valves are subject to deterioration, corrosion, and neglect— issues that can lead to severe service disruptions if left unaddressed. Our program combines decades of field expertise with disciplined procedures and precision tools to provide water utilities with precise, actionable data to maintain and optimize their valve networks.

Field Scope of Service
M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. will conduct comprehensive valve assessments in the water distribution system as determined by the Utility. Here's a condensed breakdown of our field scope of service:

Item Description
Resource Provisions  M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. will supply all necessary resources, including labor, materials, transportation, tools, and equipment
 A minimum of Two Persons per team will work on the valve assessment at all times
Safety Measures  Field staff will work in an orderly and safe manner, wearing readily observable identification badges
 We will adhere to the safety specifications outlined for equipment use Valve Location  Review water maps to locate valves as indicated  Conduct visual inspections and utilize appropriate equipment to locate valves accurately
 Document mapping discrepancies and update existing maps accordingly  Maintain a progression map indicating valves that have been assessed  Apply environmentally formulated paint for future identification Valve Exercising  Operate valves manually following AWWA M-44 guidelines  Clean valve enclosures for maintenance and inspection purposes  Perform valve operations with minimum torque to prevent damage  Use hydraulic valve machines for valves requiring torque exceeding specified limits

Valves to be Assessed  Conduct assessments according to the designated areas and report any issues promptly.

Page 99 ends

M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. | Valve Assessment Program
 Maintain confidentiality of all collected data and share information with the Utility as required.

Documentation of
Valve Operations
 Digitally document all valve inspections based on current AWWA standards
 Record valve operations, locations, and any issues encountered Quality Control  Maintain strict adherence to a systematic valve assessment procedure  Two-Person Teams to ensure oversight
 Advanced correlator technology allows for comprehensive leak coverage Final Reports and
Communication
 Regular meetings with the Utility will ensure ongoing communication  Final reports will include all valve documentation, total number of valves operated, valves requiring maintenance, and other problems found in the system during the course of the program that need the attention of the Utility
 Reports provided within thirty (20) working days of project completion Assumptions and
Services Provided by
the Utility
 Furnish necessary maps, records, and information for valve assessment  Assist in gaining access to sites and provide personnel with water system knowledge as needed
 Provide Valve ID numbers, map references, and additional information to facilitate the assessment process
Equipment Used  All necessary hand tools
 Truck mounted Arrow Board/Signage, and warning lights on trucks  Traffic control equipment, including properly sized traffic cones with reflective stripes, when needed or required
 A “Schonstedt”/“Chicago Tape” magnetic locator
 Truck mounted or trailer mounted hydraulic valve operator with adjustable torque control
 Portable hydraulic valve operator adjustable torque control  Truck mounted or trailer mounted Vacuum capable of 300 CFM  Trucks are equipped with either a Honda 6.5 horsepower pump capable of discharging 150 GPM or a Stanley Hydraulic pump capable of discharging 450 GPM
 Extendable valve keys for manual operation

Page 100 ends

M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. | Valve Assessment Program
Field Scope of Service – Shutdowns
M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. will conduct shutdown services on the segments of water main designated through the comprehensive valve assessment program. Here's a condensed breakdown of our field scope of service: The crew will isolate specific segments of the water main between two valves, beginning by setting up a secure traffic and work zone, and preparing the selected valves. They will observe and follow system hydraulics as closely as possible. They will slowly close the upstream valve, then close the downstream valve in the same manner, ensuring the valves are fully seated. Once both valves are closed, bleed the pressure from the isolated segment by installing a pressure gauge and then opening the nearest hydrant on that pipe segment or blow-off to ensure the flow ceases, and the pressure gauge reads zero.

Once the shutdown has been verified, re-energize the line by slowly opening the selected valves that created the shutdown.

Page 101 ends

M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. | Valve Assessment Program

P R O J E C T S A F E T Y P L A N
M.E. Simpson Co., Inc.’s Safety Programs cover all aspects of the work performed by M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. We take great pride in our safety program, and that is evident in our EMR scores over the last five years. The safety of our employees, the utilities employees, and that of the general public is our #1 priority.

Our Safety Program, with all of its parts, is 140 pages in length. To be more efficient and less wasteful, we do not print copies of the safety program for RFPs. There is nothing secretive or proprietary contained within our safety program, and we are happy to share its contents. If you would like a PDF copy, please contact Terrence Williams, Operations Manager, at (800) 255-1521, and a copy will be sent to you via email.

M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. uses Two-Man Teams for Safety and Quality Assurance.

The use of a “one-person” team is dangerous. Many of the utilities' assets are located in roadways, treatment facilities, and confined spaces. For safety, M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. always deploys a two-person team.

M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. adheres to the following:

The Project Manager and the Field Manager will be trained in accordance with OSHA Standard 1910 (General Industry) and have an OSHA 10-Hour or 30-Hour Card.

Any activity located in a "confined space", such as pit and vault installations that require entry, will be treated per the safety rules regarding Confined Space Entry, designated by the Utility, the Department of Labor, and OSHA. All personnel are trained and certified in Confined Space Entry & Self-Rescue.

We will follow all safety rules regarding First Responder First Aid & CPR, designated by the Utility, the Department of Labor, and OSHA. All personnel are trained and certified in First Responder First Aid & CPR.

We will follow all traffic safety rules designated by the Utility, the Department of Labor, OSHA, and the Department of Transportation. All personnel are trained and certified by the AMERICAN TRAFFIC SAFETY SERVICES ASSOCIATION (ATSSA) in Traffic Control and Safety.

Current documentation of safety training and certifications can be provided for all project personnel for the Utility. These certifications are current and up-to-date for all project personnel. “Safety is a significant part of any project. M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. consistently provides a safe work environment for its employees. Our staff is trained in General Industry OSHA rules, Confined Space Entry & Self-Rescue, First Responder First Aid, CPR, and Traffic Control. While in the field on your project, M.E. Simpson Co., Inc., and its employees will follow all of the necessary safety procedures to protect themselves, your staff, and the general public.”

Page 102 ends

M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. | Valve Assessment Program

P R O P O S E D P R O J E C T S C H E D U L E
Project Start Date: TBD.

Kick-Off Meeting: TBD after the Project Start Date is finalized.

Completion of Field-Work: Approximately 20 days.

Final Reports: Within 20 Business days of Project Completion.

Page 103 ends

M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. | Valve Assessment Program

I N V E S T M E N T
A commitment to improving and maximizing the City of
Sanger’s water distribution system for future generations.

M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. is pleased to offer the City of Sanger, CA our proposal for a Valve Assessment and Exercising program. This program is based on locating, exercising, assessing, and documenting approximately 200 Valves in the City of Sanger’s water distribution system.

2025 Valve Program Fee
Valves Exercised at $3,750.00 daily (Approx. 20 days) $75,000.00 Report Fee $ 4,000.00
Mobilization $16,400.00
Total $95,400.00

These fees are all based on approximate numbers of valves to be exercised and assessed. The total price will change according to the actual number of valves completed. All procedures will be followed according to the above scope of services.

We thank you for this opportunity to introduce our Valve Exercising and Assessment Program and offer this proposal. If you have further inquiries or would like to discuss our service further, do not hesitate to call us.

Page 104 ends

M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. | Valve Assessment Program

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement, the scope and proposal above for the City of Sanger, CA, to be executed on ________________________________ 2025.

Owner Service Provider
City of Sanger, CA M.E. Simpson Company, Inc.

By: By:

Name: ________________________ Name: Michael D. Simpson Title: _________________________ Title: Chief Executive Officer

Attest: Attest:

Name: ________________________ Name: Joe Nepras
Title: _________________________ Title: Regional Manager

Page 105 ends

M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. | Valve Assessment Program

T E R M S & C O N D I T I O N S
The following terms and conditions of sale (“Terms”) govern all sales of services, as detailed in this proposal (“Services”) by M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. These Terms supersede any prior written or oral agreement, understanding, representation or promise, and any pre-printed or standard terms and conditions included in Buyer’s request for quote, purchase order, invoice, order acknowledgment or similar document. These Terms may not be amended or modified, except by concurrent or subsequent written agreement signed by an authorized representative of M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. and Buyer. M.E. Simpson Co., Inc.’s acknowledgement of Buyer’s purchase order will not constitute acceptance of any terms and conditions contained therein, regardless of how such terms and conditions may be prefaced or described.

1. Scope of Work: M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. agrees to conduct a [PROJECT NAME] as outlined in the proposal document, utilizing state-of-the- art technologies and experienced personnel to identify and address water losses within the designated water distribution system.

2. Project Timeline: The project timeline provided in the proposal is an estimate and subject to change based on weather conditions, site accessibility, and unforeseen circumstances. M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. will make reasonable efforts to adhere to the proposed schedule but cannot guarantee strict adherence.

3. Client Cooperation: The successful completion of the [PROJECT NAME] is contingent upon the full cooperation and support of the client, including providing access to necessary infrastructure, data, and personnel as requested by M.E. Simpson Co., Inc.

4. Confidentiality: All information and data obtained during the [PROJECT NAME] will be treated as confidential and used solely for the project. M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. will not disclose any sensitive information to third parties without prior consent from the client.

5. Payment Terms: Payment for services rendered by M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. shall be made by the terms outlined in the proposal document.

Any additional costs incurred due to changes in project scope or unforeseen circumstances shall be agreed upon by both parties in writing before implementation.

6. Liability: While every effort will be made to minimize risks and ensure the safety of personnel and property during the [PROJECT NAME], M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. shall not be held liable for any damages, losses, or injuries arising from the performance of the project, except in cases of proven negligence.

7. Intellectual Property: Any intellectual property rights associated with the findings, reports, or recommendations resulting from the [PROJECT NAME] shall remain the property of M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. unless otherwise agreed upon in writing.

8. Termination: Either party reserves the right to terminate the agreement upon written notice in case of a material breach by the other party or if circumstances make it impossible to continue the project.

9. Governing Law: This agreement shall be governed by and construed by the jurisdiction's laws where the project is conducted without regard to its conflict of law provisions.

10. Amendments: Any amendments or modifications to the terms and conditions of this agreement must be made in writing and signed by authorized representatives of both parties.

PURCHASE AND SALE
M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. hereby agrees to deliver Services and Buyer agrees to purchase Services on the terms set forth in the proposal and subject to these Terms. Subject to the proposal, Buyer may issue M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. purchase orders for the purchase of Services from M.E.

SIMPSON CO., INC. All purchase orders are subject to acceptance by M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. and will reference this proposal and agreement and will describe at a minimum Services being purchased, the purchase price and requested performance date.

PURCHASE PRICE AND TAXES
(a) Price: The price to be paid by Buyer for Services is set forth in this proposal or, if the parties intend to contract using purchase orders, will be set forth in one or more purchase orders. The purchase price excludes any applicable taxes. (b) Taxes: M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC.’s price, unless otherwise agreed, will be fixed and does not include, and M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. is not responsible for, payment of any tax levied for sales, use, excise, value-added, goods and services, business (franchise or privilege) or any duties, charges or other such taxes.
(c) Payment Terms: Payment is due within Net 30 days from the invoice delivery date. (d) Additional Services. The proposed cost of Services, as set forth in this proposal, is provided based on Services outlined in this proposal. Any work requested by Buyer must reflect the Services and otherwise fall within the terms and the conditions of the proposal. Any requests for additional services will be invoiced separately.

Page 106 ends

M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. | Valve Assessment Program
(e) Set Off. All amounts that Buyer owes M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. under an Order will be due and payable according to the terms, state above, of the Order. Buyer may not set-off such amounts or any portion thereof, whether or not liquidated, against sums that Buyer asserts are due it or any of its affiliates under other transactions with M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. or any of its affiliates.

TIMING OF DELIVERY
M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. will use commercially reasonable efforts to complete the Services within the timeframe, if any, indicated in this proposal.

Actual delivery times may vary, and M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. will be liable for a delay in delivery only to the extent that M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. fails to exercise commercially reasonable efforts in performing the Services. Failure to deliver Services by any mutually agreed date will not be a sufficient cause for cancellation of this agreement. M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. will not be liable for delay in delivery due to causes beyond its reasonable control, including, but not limited to, acts of God, acts of government, acts of Buyer, fires, labor disputes, boycotts, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, war, insurrection, terrorism, riot, civil or military authority, freight embargos, transportation shortages or delays, unusually severe weather or inability to obtain necessary labor, materials or manufacturing facilities due to such causes. In the event of any such delay, the date of delivery will be extended for a length of time equal to the period of the delay.

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
(a) Consequential Damages: IN NO EVENT WILL M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOST REVENUE, LOST PROFITS, LOST SAVINGS OR CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL, EXEMPLARY OR PUNITIVE DAMAGES EVEN IF ADVISED IN ADVANCE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. (b) Limitation of Direct Damages: IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM, DEMAND OR ACTION BY BUYER AGAINST M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. OR ANY OF ITS EMPLOYEES, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, AFFILIATES OR AGENTS (THE “PROTECTED PARTIES”) WHETHER BASED IN CONTRACT, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), OR OTHERWISE, INCLUDING A BREACH BY M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. OF ANY OF ITS OBLIGATIONS (WHETHER OR NOT A FUNDAMENTAL BREACH), BUYER’S EXCLUSIVE REMEDY WILL BE TO RECEIVE FROM M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. PAYMENT FOR ACTUAL AND DIRECT DAMAGES TO A MAXIMUM AGGREGATE AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE PURCHASE PRICE PAID BY BUYER TO M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. FOR THE SERVICES IN QUESTION.
(c) Asbestos: During the course of delivering Services, M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. may conduct tests on asbestos cement pipe. Any information provided to Buyer by M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. regarding the condition or serviceability of such pipe relates only to its capacity to hold and transport water. As between the parties, Buyer is solely responsible for complying with all laws and regulations related to asbestos and asbestos cement pipe. Buyer will protect, indemnify and hold harmless the Protected Parties from and against any and all actions, causes of action, proceedings, losses, damages, judgments, penalties and expenses that may be imposed on, incurred by or asserted or threatened against the Protected Parties that are related to asbestos or asbestos cement pipe and M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC.’s performance of this contract. (d) Buyer agrees to look exclusively to Buyer’s insurer to recover for injuries or damage in the event of any loss or injury and Buyer releases and waives all right of recovery against M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. arising by way of subrogation.

INDEMNITY
Buyer agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC., and its directors, officers, employees, agents, successors, assigns, customers, users and those for whom it acts as agent (together, the “Indemnified Parties”) against any and all judgments, losses, damages, violations, penalties, expenses, costs, including defense costs and legal fees, arising from any and all lawsuits, demands, or claims for personal injury, death, property damage, or other liability arising or claimed to arise from any act or omission of the Buyer, its agents or its employees that is related to the performance of this Agreement.

DISCLAIMER
All forms of non-destructive testing involve an inherent and unavoidable level of uncertainty. The results provided by M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. are not guaranteed. The methods used are highly dependent on input parameters and provided data; therefore, it is not possible to certify the results. M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. is not responsible for any actions taken or recommendations made by Buyer based on the results presented in the report.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
(a) M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. owns all right, title and interest in and to the Services, including all components thereof, and all derivative works, modifications and all Intellectual Property Rights related thereto or derived therefrom. Intellectual Property Rights means all inventions, processes, business models, methods of doing business, know-how, works of authorship, copy, artwork, designs, software, code, and other material, and all patents, trademarks, service marks, copyrights, trade secrets, moral rights, and other intellectual property and proprietary rights therein.

Page 107 ends

M.E. Simpson Co., Inc. | Valve Assessment Program
(b) Each party hereto will keep and own its Intellectual Property Rights existing prior to the Effective Date of this Agreement. Except as expressly set forth herein, none of the execution, delivery nor performance of this Agreement will be construed as granting or conferring to either party hereto, or any other third party, any interest, right or license of any kind or nature in or to the other party’s Intellectual Property Rights. (c) All information, technology, materials and other work, including the Intellectual Property Rights related thereto, conceived, discovered, developed or created pursuant to this Agreement, alone or in conjunction with a third party (“Project Work”), is and will be owned exclusively by M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. Buyer hereby unconditionally and irrevocably transfers and assigns and upon the future creation thereof transfers and assigns to M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. all right, title and interest in or to any Project Work. M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. hereby grants Buyer a worldwide, non-exclusive, non-transferable, non-sub-licensable, perpetual right to use, copy or modify any report or other deliverable provided by M.E.

SIMPSON CO., INC. in the course of performing the Services. All rights not expressly granted to Buyer under this agreement are expressly reserved by M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC.

MISCELLANEOUS
(a) These Terms will be binding upon and will inure to the benefit of M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. and Buyer and their respective successors and permitted assigns. Buyer will not assign this agreement or its rights or obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC.
(b) Governing Law; Time Limit to Bring Claims: These Terms will be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, in the case of M.E. Simpson Co., Inc., the laws in force in the State of Indiana (in each case, excluding any conflict of laws rule or principle which might refer such construction to the laws of another jurisdiction). The parties agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the courts of the of the State of Indiana, respectively, and in each case waive any objection relating to improper venue or forum non conveniens to the conduct of any proceeding in any such court. It is agreed that no suit or cause of action or other proceeding will be brought against either party more than 1 year after accrual of the cause of action or 1 year after the claim arises, whichever is shorter, whether known or unknown when the claim arises or whether based on tort, contract or any other legal theory.
(c) Severability: If any portion of these Terms is determined to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable for any reason, then such provision will be deemed stricken for purposes of the dispute in question and all other provisions will remain in full force and effect. (d) Waiver: Failure by M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. to assert all or any of its rights upon any breach of this agreement will not be deemed a waiver of such rights either with respect to such breach or any subsequent breach, nor will any waiver be implied from the acceptance of any payment of service. No waiver of any right will extend to or affect any other right M.E. SIMPSON CO., INC. may possess, nor will such waver extend to any subsequent similar or dissimilar breach.

Page 108 ends

From: Shaffer Fluetsch
To: Andy Alvarez
Cc: George Jasso
Subject: RE: Valve King Valve Exercising Program
Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 11:24:00 AM
Hi Andy. I hope you had a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Years! Just want to check back in to see if you have any updates for us. Thank you very much.

From:

Shaffer Fluetsch
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2025 9:30 AM
To: Andy Alvarez <[email protected]>
Cc: George Jasso <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Valve King Valve Exercising Program

Hi Andy. Just wanted to check in on your proposal. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks!

From:

Shaffer Fluetsch
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2025 3:52 PM
To: Andy Alvarez <[email protected]>
Cc: George Jasso <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Valve King Valve Exercising Program

Hi Andy. Just want to follow up on your proposal. Thank you!

From:

Andy Alvarez <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2025 10:23 AM
To: Shaffer Fluetsch <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Valve King Valve Exercising Program

EXTERNAL EMAIL - This email was sent by a person from outside your organization. Exercise caution when clicking links, opening attachments or taking further action, before validating its authenticity.

Hello Shaffer,

We are working with our GIS team on getting that quote sent out to you.

Andy Alvarez
VALVE KING inc.
[email protected]
310-493-0046

Page 109 ends

Inline image

On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 10:50
AM Shaffer Fluetsch <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Andy. Just want to reach back out to see if you’ve had a chance to evaluate the data. Thank you!

From:

George Jasso <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2025 3:21 PM
To: Shaffer Fluetsch <[email protected]>; Andy Alvarez <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Valve King Valve Exercising Program

Nope, You hit all the highlights Shaffer,

George

From:

Shaffer Fluetsch <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2025 3:12 PM
To: Andy Alvarez <[email protected]>
Cc: George Jasso <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Valve King Valve Exercising Program

Hi Andy. Attached are the shapefiles we’ve had our GIS staff put together for specific sections in the city that are of the most concern to us. We have it narrowed down to about 200 valves within our distribution system that will need addressing. As a reminder, here is the scope of work we are looking for:

Getting our valves accurately mapped in GIS
Noting the condition of each valve with recommendations if Verifying shutdowns
Having a corrective action plan put in place once valves have been mapped, exercised, and shutdowns have been confirmed

George, please let me know if I’m missing anything.

Please let me know if you need anything else in order to review and provide us a quote. Thank you

Page 110 ends

very much!

From:

Shaffer Fluetsch
Sent: Friday, October 3, 2025 1:28 PM
To: Andy Alvarez <[email protected]>
Cc: George Jasso <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Valve King Valve Exercising Program

Hi Andy. Thank you for following up. We are actually mapping the sections of town of most concern and will be checking with our GIS consultant on creating a file based on those sections for your review. Once I get some more information, I will let you know.

From:

Andy Alvarez <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 3, 2025 12:11 PM
To: Shaffer Fluetsch <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Valve King Valve Exercising Program

Shaffer,

Following up on our meeting. Could we get the GIS database so we can complete our quote?

Thank you,

Andy Alvarez
VALVE KING inc.

[email protected]

Page 111 ends

310-493-0046

On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 8:18
AM Shaffer Fluetsch <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Andy. Yes, it’s set up for 1-2 PM today. It looks like you’ve also accepted the meeting. Thank you for following up.

From:

Andy Alvarez <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2025 7:40 PM
To: Shaffer Fluetsch <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Valve King Valve Exercising Program

Shaffer,

Are you still open this week for a teams call? Both of your emails were sent to my spam for some reason and I did not see the teams invitation. Sorry for any inconvenience.

Thank you,

Andy Alvarez
VALVE KING inc.

[email protected]

Page 112 ends

310-493-0046

On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 2:51
PM Shaffer Fluetsch <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Andy. I spoke to Russ, and I’ll set up a Teams Meeting for Sept 17 from 1-2 PM. Thank you all.

From:

Shaffer Fluetsch
Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2025 9:10 AM
To: Andy Alvarez <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Valve King Valve Exercising Program

Yes, let’s please have a meeting. Would Teams work for you? We are pretty open the week of September 15. Also, could you resend the quote for review? Thank you very much!

From:

Andy Alvarez <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2025 6:43 PM
To: Shaffer Fluetsch <[email protected]> Subject: Valve King Valve Exercising Program

Dear Shaffer,

Page 113 ends

My name is Andy Alvarez, and I am with Valve King. I spoke with George last year about implementing a valve exercising program. At that time, he suggested reaching out before July 1st. I’ve tried contacting him but haven’t been able to get through. We also sent a quote for valve maintenance last year.

I’d like to discuss this further and explore how we can assist you. Could we schedule a meeting at your convenience? Please let me know a suitable time.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards,
Andy Alvarez
Valve King
Andy Alvarez
VALVE KING inc.

[email protected]

310-493-0046

Page 114 ends

Prepared by: _Greg Tarascou _ Approved by: _______________________ REVIEW: City Manager: ______ Finance: _______ City Attorney: ______ TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO ACTION __X_ Consent
____ Info Item
__X_ Action Item
____ Department Report
____ Redevelopment Agency
____ Public Hearing
____ Matter Initiated by a Council Member
____ Other
____ Continued to: __________
For the Meeting of: February 1 9, 2026
Agenda Item No.: E-9

CITY OF SANGER

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
To: Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Greg Tarascou, Fire Chief
Subject: Out of State Travel Request
Attachments: None
CONF
LICT OF INTEREST:

None
known.

RECO
MMENDATION:

Tha
t the City Council approves the out of State travel and training for the Fir e Department Fire Chief, Paramedic Li aison Officer and Fire Inspector to attend the ESO Training Academy and Wave Conference from April 6-10, 2026, in Austin, Texas.

EXE
CUTIVE SUMMARY:

Th
e ESO Wave Conference is a four -day industry- leading event focused on data -driven emergency response improvements, bringing together Fire, EMS, hospital and government professionals to learn, network and sh ape future operations. This training al igns directly with the Fire Department’ s organizational goals to enhance operational effectiveness, data usage, interoperability, inspection and compliance processes and community outcomes.

BACK
GROUND:

Th
e Fire Department has utilized ESO Solutions as our software platform for nearly a decade. Software tools such as our electronic patient care reporting software, fire incident documentation, inspections and prevention documentation, quality improvement and ambu lance billing are used by staff daily and provide for the mandated reporting we are required to do. These informative sessions during the

Page 115 ends

\\nas1\shared\Forms & Templates

conference show how modern data tools and analytics that are currently available can improve emergency response outcomes, resource deployment, documentation quality and integrated emergency workflows. Understanding t hese tools supports data- informed decision making that drives better community service delivery, performance measurement and appropriate allocation of budgeted dollars.

REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION:

This training and educational event is only offered in Austin. Conferences such as this create long-term organizational impact by learning how to leverage the available technology to remain forward-thinking and adaptable, especially in areas such as data analytics, electronic records and maintaining compliance with Federal and State laws and guidelines.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total cost to attend this conference including flight, hotel, per diem and conference registration is $3,500 per person. There are sufficient funds to cover the cost of this training within the General Fund and Measure “R” training budgets.

ALTERNATIVES:

Do not approve the request in which case the staff will not attend the conference.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL:

Upon approval the normal travel and training forms will circulate through the City Manager’s Office.

Page 116 ends

Prepared by: Esperanza Rosales____ Approved by: __Esperanza Rosales_________________

REVIEW: City Manager: ______ Finance: _______ City Attorney: ______ TYPE OF ITEM: COUNCIL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED NO
ACTION
____ Consent
____ Info Item
_X__ Action Item
_X__ Department Report
____ Redevelopment Agency

____ Public Hearing
____ Matter Initiated by a Council Member
____ Other
____ Continued to: __________

For the Meeting of: February 19, 2026
Agenda Item No.: F-1

CITY OF SANGER

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

To: Mayor and City Council
From: Esperanza Rosales, Public Works Director
Subject: Review and Acceptance of the City of Sanger – Industrial Pretreatment Program Local Limits Evaluation Report
Attachments: 1) Industrial Pretreatment Program Local Limits Evaluation Report

ONFLICT OF INTEREST
None known.

ECOMMENDATION
Staff recommend that the City Council, by motion, accept the City of Sanger - Industrial Pretreatment Program Local Limits Evaluation Report conducted by AM Consulting Engineers and authorize the Public Works Director or designee to submit the report and propose updated local limits to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for review and approval.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Sanger contracted AM Consulting Engineers to conduct a comprehensive local limit study.

This study was federally and state mandated to update the City’s outdated industrial discharge limits ensuring that industrial pollutants do not interfere with the treatment process, cause the City to violate its Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs), or contaminate biosolids.

Page 117 ends

BACKGROUND
The City of Sanger contracted with AM Consulting Engineers to conduct a comprehensive local limit study. The City of Sanger operates two separate wastewater treatment facilities:
• Domestic WWTF: Operating under Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) R5-2014-0004. • Industrial WWTF: Operating under Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) 98-131 The City’s Industrial Pretreatment Program is mandated by federal and state regulations (40CFR 403) to ensure industries do not discharge pollutants that could:
• Interfere with the Wastewater Treatment Facility treatment processes. • Cause the City to violate its WDR permit limits or water quality standards. • Contaminate biosolids (sludge) or impact public health and safety.

Local Limits
Local Limits are specific pollutant concentration limits set by the City for industrial discharges into the sanitary sewer system. They are the primary tool used to protect the treatment facilities, the environment, and public health. The City’s previous local limits were outdated. This comprehensive study was required and conducted using current monitoring data and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) guidance to update them.

Study Objectives
The Study was performed with the following key objectives:
• Evaluate Existing Conditions: Assess current wastewater pollutant loading at both the Domestic and the Industrial Treatment Facilities.
• Determine Capacity: Establish available treatment capacity based on current WDR design criteria. • Update Pollutant Limits: Develop new industrial discharge limits that:
o Protect each facilities treatment performance.
o Maintain compliance with state and federal regulations. o Preserve capacity for future industrial and residential growth.

Development of Local Limits
The development process involved two distinct phases:

Phase I: Evaluation of WDR-Based Local Limit
This phase focused on pollutants regulated by the City’s current WDRs. • Domestic WWTF Evaluation: The analysis centered on Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Total Suspended Solids (TSS), and Electrical Conductivity (EC). Recent sampling data from the plant and collection system were used to partition the load between residential and industrial sources. The findings were compared against the facility’s design capacity to confirm available capacity and develop updated industrial limits that remain within WDR compliance. • Industrial WWTF Evaluation: A similar approach was used, comparing monitoring data to the facility’s design flow and treatment capacity, particularly focusing on the strength of wastewater from major industries.

Page 118 ends

Phase II: Evaluation of Local Limits Using EPA Guidance This phase applied the U.S. EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance (2004) to evaluate additional Pollutants of Concern that may affect: treatment performance, biosolid quality, and receiving water quality. The process involved:
• Identifying Pollutants of Concern not directly regulated by the WDR’s (e.g metals). • Determining pollutant removal efficiency at each facility. • Calculating Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings (MAHLs) the highest pollutant load that can enter the facility without causing interference or environmental harm. • Using the most conservative MAHL results to recommend protective local limits.

Proposed Local Limits
The study recommends the following updated local limits for both the Domestic and Industrial WWTF’s, derived from the WDR, facility design data, and EPA guidance:

Comparison of Existing and Proposed Local Limits
Pollutant Existing Local
Limit(1)
Industrial WWTF Domestic WWTF
Proposed
Local Limit
Required
Local Limit
Proposed
Local Limit
Required
Local Limit

Arsenic 1.0 mg/L 0.012 mg/L No 0.22 mg/L No
Cadmium 0.7 mg/L 0.006 mg/L No 0.11 mg/L No
Chromium 1.0 mg/L 0.05 mg/L No 0.93 mg/L No
Copper 1.0 mg/L 0.058 mg/L Yes 0.03 mg/L Yes
Cyanide 1.0 mg/L 0.015 mg/L Yes 0.25 mg/L No
Lead 0.4 mg/L 0.006 mg/L Yes 0.07 mg/L No
Mercury 0.01 mg/L 0.002 mg/L No 0.03 mg/L No
Nickel 1.0 mg/L 0.081 mg/L No 1.53 mg/L No
Silver 0.7 mg/L 0.00 mg/L No 0.00 mg/L No
Zinc 1.0 mg/L 0.343 mg/L Yes 2.71 mg/L Yes
Molybdenum None 0.024 mg/L No 0.45 mg/L No
Selenium 2.0 mg/L 0.009 mg/L Yes 0.04 mg/L Yes
BOD5 300 mg/L 1,000 mg/L Yes 500 mg/L Yes
Total Suspended Solids 300 mg/L 600mg/L Yes 500 mg/L Yes Ammonia 0.32 mg/L 27 mg/L No 327 mg/L Yes
EC 700 µmhos/cm 700 µmhos/cm Yes 1,000 µmhos/cm Yes
pH 6.5 – 8.5 6.0 – 9.0 Yes 6.0 – 9.0 Yes
FOG 100 mg/L 100 mg/L Yes 100 mg/L Yes
Note:
(1)Existing Local Limit are detailed in Section 82-175 of the City of Sanger's Municipal Code and pertain to both the Industrial and Domestic WWTFs.

Page 119 ends

The proposed limits are essential for several key reasons: they are necessary to protect each facility’s treatment performance and long-term reliability, required to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements, serve to fairly allocate capacity between residential and industrial users, and preserve sufficient treatment capacity for future growth.

Outreach and Industry Engagement
The Public Works Department conducted a series of meetings with affected industries to present the draft Local Limits Evaluation Study. These meetings were collaborative and productive; staff addressed technical questions regarding the proposed new limits, and industry representatives were provided with the opportunity to discuss potential operational impacts.

Electrical Conductivity (EC) Limit Exemptions for Dischargers One of the City’s primary industries communicated that they would be unable to meet the newly proposed Electrical Conductivity (EC) limits based on their current operations. In response, the City sought further guidance from the Regional Water Quality Control Board.

The Regional Board determined that the City is exempt from strictly enforcing the EC limits on individual dischargers provided that the City remains an active participant in the Central Valley Salinity Alternatives for Long Term Sustainability (CV-SALTS) coalition. CV-SALTS is a collaborative initiative developed to manage salt and nitrates in the Central Valley to ensure long-term water quality and economic sustainability.

Under this program, the City must ensure that these industries maintain their current discharge quality, provided these levels do not worsen. This specific exemption and the requirement to maintain current EC discharge quality will be formally documented in the respective user discharge permit.

EASON FOR RECOMMENDATION
To establish Implementation Plan (Regulatory Submittal and Ordinance Amendment) to ensure legal compliance, financial responsibility, and infrastructure longevity.

FISCAL IMPACT
Acceptance is a crucial step in sound fiscal stewardship, primarily generating benefits through cost avoidance of penalties associated with regulatory non-compliance and long-term asset protection.

ALTERNATIVES
Do not accept the report and provide staff with further direction, although not recommended.

ACTIONS FOLLOWING APPROVAL
The Public Works Department will submit the Local Limit Evaluation Report to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for approval and subsequently prepare the necessary ordinance amendments.

Page 120 ends

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 121 ends

AM Consulting Engineers, Inc. − 5150 N Sixth Street, Suite 124 − Fresno, CA 93711 − P: 559.473.1371 − F: 559.513.8449

CITY OF SANGER

INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT PROGRAM

LOCAL LIMITS EVALUATION
DRAFT
October 2025
Prepared by:

Page 122 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 2

1.1. Need for Local Limits ..................................................................................................................... 2

1.2. Facility Description ........................................................................................................................ 2

1.2.1. Domestic Wastewater Treatment Facility ............................................................................ 3

1.2.2. Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility ............................................................................ 3

1.3. Industrial Dischargers ................................................................................................................... 4 SECTION 2 - LOCAL LIMIT DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................................... 5

2.1. Pollutants of Concern .................................................................................................................... 5

2.2. EPA POCs ....................................................................................................................................... 5

2.3. Waste Discharge Requirements POCs .......................................................................................... 6

2.4. Other Reasons for POCs ................................................................................................................ 7

2.4.1. Water Quality Criteria ........................................................................................................... 7

2.4.2. Biosolids Land Application Criteria ....................................................................................... 7

2.4.3. Interference and Inhibition Criteria ...................................................................................... 7

2.4.4. Protection of Treatment Works, Collection System, and Workers ....................................... 8 SECTION 3 - DEVELOPMENT OF LOCAL DISCHARGE LIMITS ......................................................................... 9

3.1. Evaluation of WDR-Based Local Limits .......................................................................................... 9

3.1.1. Domestic WWTF Local Limit Development ........................................................................... 9

3.1.2. Industrial WWTF Local Limit Development ........................................................................ 11

3.2. Evaluation of Local Limits Using EPA Guidance .......................................................................... 13

3.2.1. WWTF Removal Efficiencies ................................................................................................ 14

3.2.2. Allowable Headworks Loadings .......................................................................................... 15

3.2.3. Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings ......................................................................... 25

3.2.4. Designating Local Limits ...................................................................................................... 27

3.2.5. Background Loadings for Non-Industrial Sources ............................................................... 28

3.2.6. Maximum Allowable Industrial Loadings ............................................................................ 29

3.2.7. Local Limits Allocation ......................................................................................................... 32

3.2.8. Industrial WWTF – Evaluation of Local Limits ..................................................................... 32

Page 123 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Table of Contents
iii

3.2.9. Domestic WWTF – Evaluation of Local Limits ..................................................................... 33 SECTION 4 - Proposed Local Limits ............................................................................................................. 35

4.1. Comparison of Existing and Proposed Limits .............................................................................. 35

4.2. Recommended Action and Conclusion ....................................................................................... 36

APPENDIX A RESIDENTIAL BACKGROUND SAMPLING

LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1 EPA POCs ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Table 2-2 Domestic WWTF WDRs POCs ........................................................................................................ 6 Table 3-1 Evaluation of Current Values ........................................................................................................ 9 Table 3-2 Domestic WWTF Design Loadings and Allocations ..................................................................... 10 Table 3-3 Domestic WWTF Proposed Industrial Local Limits and Spare Capacity ...................................... 11 Table 3-4 Industrial WWTF Current Influent Conditions (2024) ................................................................. 12 Table 3-5 Industrial WWTF Design, 2024 Influent Loadings, and Spare Capacity ...................................... 12 Table 3-6 Industrial WWTF Proposed Industrial Local Limits and Spare Capacity...................................... 13 Table 3-7 Summary of Removal Efficiencies ............................................................................................... 14 Table 3-8 Industrial WWTF – Water Quality Standard AHLs ...................................................................... 17 Table 3-9 Domestic WWTF – Water Quality Standard AHLs ....................................................................... 18 Table 3-10 Industrial WWTF – Summary of Water Quality Standard AHLs ................................................ 19 Table 3-11 Domestic WWTF – Summary of Water Quality Standard AHLs ................................................ 19 Table 3-12 Industrial WWTF – Summary of Biosolids Disposal Based AHLs ............................................... 21 Table 3-13 Domestic WWTF – Summary of Biosolids Disposal Based AHLs ............................................... 22 Table 3-14 Industrial WWTF – Activated Sludge and Nitrification Inhibition Based AHLs ......................... 23 Table 3-15 Domestic WWTF – Activated Sludge and Nitrification Inhibition Based AHLs ......................... 24 Table 3-16 Industrial WWTF – Summary Inhibition Based AHLs ................................................................ 24 Table 3-17 Domestic WWTF – Summary Inhibition Based AHLs ................................................................ 25 Table 3-18 Industrial WWTF – Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings ................................................ 25 Table 3-19 Domestic WWTF – Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings ................................................ 26 Table 3-20 Industrial WWTF - Comparison of MAHLs with Average Headworks Loadings ........................ 27 Table 3-21 Domestic WWTF - Comparison of MAHLs with Average Headworks Loadings ........................ 27 Table 3-22 Estimated Background Loadings from Non-Industrial Sources ................................................ 29

Page 124 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Table of Contents
iv
Table 3-23 Industrial WWTF – Maximum Allowable Industrial Loadings ................................................... 30 Table 3-24 Domestic WWTF – Maximum Allowable Industrial Loadings ................................................... 31 Table 3-25 Industrial WWTF – Uniform Allocation of Local Limits ............................................................. 33 Table 3-26 Domestic WWTF – Uniform Allocation of Local Limits ............................................................. 33 Table 4-1 Comparison of Existing and Proposed Local Limits ..................................................................... 35

Page 125 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Abbreviation
v

ABBREVIATIONS
AHL
ACGIH

BOD

EC
EPA

HDPE

MAHL
µmhos/cm
MGD
mg/L

NIOSH

OSHA

lbs/day
PWTW

SIU

TSS

VOC

WDR
WWTF

Allowable Headworks Loading
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists

Biochemical Oxygen Demand

Electrical Conductivity
Environmental Protection Agency

High-Density Polyethylene

Maximum Allowable Headworks Loading
Micromhos per Centimeter
Million Gallons per Day
Milligram per Liter

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Occupational Health and Safety Administration

Pounds per Day
Publicly Owned Treatment Works

Significant Industrial User

Total Suspended Solids

Volatile Organic Compound

Waste Discharge Requirements
Wastewater Treatment Facility

Page 126 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 1 – Introduction
2 SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION

1.1. Need for Local Limits
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) serve a crucial role in regulating the type and volume of pollutants introduced into municipal wastewater systems. These regulations are essential for protecting treatment facilities from operational disruptions, preventing the pass -through of contaminants, maintaining water quality in the underlining groundwater and receiving streams, preserving sludge integrity, and ensuring worker safety. Additionally, POTWs must effectively manage conventional pollutants to maintain compliance with permit limits while ensuring the long -term efficiency of their systems.

To regulate the discharge of toxic and conventional pollutants from non -domestic sources, POTWs establish and enforce Pretreatment Standards, commonly referred to as local limits. The U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) outlines the recommended approach for developing these limits in its Local Limits Development Guidance (2004).

The City of Sanger (City) owns and operates two separate wastewater treatment facilities (WWTFs): a Domestic WWTF and Industrial WWTF. These facilities serve residential, commercial, and industrial users within the City’s service area and are located on adjacent properties southeast of the City limits. Each WWTF operates with independent collection, treatment, and disposal systems and is regulated under separate Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) issued by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.

This Local Limits Study was prepared to evaluate and establish pollutant discharge limitations for both the City of Sanger’s Domestic and Industrial WWTFs. The purpose of the Study is to ensure that non-domestic discharges do not interfere with the performance of the WWTF’s , hinder the safe disposal or reuse of biosolids, or cause violations of the effluent limitations and groundwater protection requirements specified in the respective WDRs. Accordingly, this Study evaluates discharge limits for each facility based on its design capacity to treat specific pollutants such as biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS), electrical conductivity (EC), and fats, oils, and grease (FOG). Where facility-specific design limits are not defined for a pollutant, local discharge limits are established using procedures outlined in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Local Limits Development Guidance (July 2004).

1.2. Facility Description
The City of Sanger operates two separate WWTFs, each serving different segments of the community’s wastewater system. These facilities are regulated under distinct WDRs and differ in their treatment processes, effluent disposal methods, and the nature of incoming wastewater. The following subsections provide detailed overviews of each facility, including design capacity, key infrastructure, operational practices, and influent characteristics. This foundational information supports the evaluation of pollutant loadings and the development of technically appropriate local limits specific to each facility’s configuration and regulatory obligations.

Page 127 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 1 – Introduction
3 1.2.1. Domestic Wastewater Treatment Facility
The Domestic WWTF is regulated under Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) Order No. R5-2014-0004.

The facility includes a headworks with a grit chamber, two primary clarifiers, an activated sludge unit, secondary clarifiers, a sludge thickener, an anaerobic digester, a Dissolved Air Flotation (DAF) unit, centrifuge, and a sludge holding tank. Although a disinfection system is installed, it is not currently in operation. Treated effluent is conveyed through a 20 -inch PVC pipeline to the Lincoln Ponds, a 120 -acre City-owned property with six percolation ponds. Each pond covers approximately nine acres, providing a combined storage capacity of 328 acre-feet. Three ponds are actively used for effluent disposal, while the remaining two are reserved for emergency use. The WWTF is designed to treat an average dry -weather flow of 3.0 million gallons per day (MGD). From 2021 through 2024, the facility treated an average influent flow of approximately 1.67 MGD.

Per WDR Order No. R5 -2014-0004, the design influent average annual BOD and TSS concentrations are 224 mg/L and 226 mg/L, corresponding to 5,604 pounds per day (lbs/day) and 5,655 lbs/day, respectively.

In comparison, influent data collected in 2024 indicat ed an average annual flow of 1.80 MGD, with BOD and TSS concentrations of 243 mg/L and 272 mg/L, representing loadings of 3,649 lbs/day and 4,079 lbs/day. The average EC concentration in 2024 was 777 µmhos/cm, equating to approximately 11,651 lbs/day. Unde r the WDR, the maximum allowable EC in the discharge may not exceed the weighted average of the source water plus 500 µmhos/cm. Based on monitoring of the City’s ten groundwater supply wells, the weighted average EC of the source water was 281 µmhos/cm, es tablishing a discharge limit of 781 µmhos/cm.

The Domestic WWTF primarily receives wastewater from residential and commercial sources within the City, along with contributions from four industrial users: Initiative Foods (private -label baby food manufacturer), International Paper (corrugated packaging producer), Pitman Family Farms (chicken hatchery), and GBI USA Co. (pet treat manufacturer . While none of these users currently meet the definition of a Significant Industrial User (SIU), their discharges may contain pollutants that affect treatment performance or effluent quality. Accordingly, this Study evaluates the combined contributions of industrial and non-industrial sources to determine whether local limits are necessary for specific POCs.

1.2.2. Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility
The Industrial WWTF operates under WDR Order No. 98 -131 and is designed to treat up to 1.3 MGD of wastewater generated primarily by Pitman Farms and Gibson Winery. From 2021 through 2024, the WWTF received an average influent flow of approximately 0.842 MGD, with a 30 -day maximum daily average of approximately 1.07 MGD.

The treatment process includes headworks with dual aerated grit chambers, three mechanically aerated treatment ponds, one aerated storage pond, and three non-aerated storage ponds. The treatment ponds are lined with soil cement, and the storage ponds are lined with synthetic liners to minimize percolation.

Treated effluent is applied to 116 acres of adjacent farmland via flood or furrow irrigation at agronomic rates. The facility also has provisions to utilize a shared clarifier and filter system, operated in coordination with the Domestic WWTF, for additional treatment when necessary. Sludge that accumulates in the

Page 128 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 1 – Introduction
4 treatment ponds is removed at the discretion of a local grower and land-applied for agricultural purposes on City-owned reclamation fields. The City does not oversee sludge removal or application activities but conducts mid-year monitoring to assess solids accumulation levels.

Consistent with the Domestic WWTF, WDR Order No. 98 -131 specifies that influent EC shall not exceed the weighted average EC of the source water plus 500 µmhos/cm. Based on monitoring of the City’s groundwater supply wells, this establishes an influent EC limit of 781 µmhos/cm. Unlike the Domestic WWTF, the Industrial WWTF’s WDR does not prescribe numeric effluent limitations for BOD or TSS.

Instead, design values identified in a 1995 Black & Veatch memorandum specify maximum month daily average concentrations of 3,360 mg/L BOD and 760 mg/L TSS, corresponding to 36,429 lbs/day and 8,240 lbs/day, respectively. By comparison, influent monitoring conducted in 2024 indicated a 30-day maximum daily average flow of 0.993 MGD, with average BOD and TSS concentrations of 1,160 mg/L. The average EC influent concentration in 2024 was 1,015 µmhos/cm, equivalent to approximately 8,403 lbs/day.

The Industrial WWTF exclusively receives wastewater from Pitman Farms and Gibson Winery, both of which have been designated by the City as SIUs. Their discharges contain elevated levels of BOD, TSS, and EC that can significantly affect treatment performanc e and effluent quality. Accordingly, this Study evaluates pollutant contributions from these SIUs relative to facility design capacity and regulatory requirements to determine whether local limits are warranted for POCs.

1.3. Industrial Dischargers
The City of Sanger provides sewer service to residential, commercial, and industrial users within its service area. A dedicated industrial sewer system conveys wastewater exclusively from two SIUs: Gibson Winery and Pitman Farms. Gibson Winery, a producer of table and dessert wines, discharges primarily during the grape crush season, with peak flows typically occurring between August and October. Pitman Farms, a poultry processing facility, generates wastewater on a relatively consistent basis unlike Gibson Winery.

The volume, strength, and variability of these industrial discharges have the potential to introduce elevated pollutant loadings, particularly BOD, TSS, EC and FOG, that may impact treatment performance, regulatory compliance, and the ability to manage biosolids in accordance with state and federal standards.

For these reasons, a careful evaluation of pollutant contributions from both SIUs is critical to protecting the Industrial WWTF.

The Domestic WWTF, in contrast, receives flows from residential neighborhoods, commercial establishments, and several small -scale industrial sources , as detailed in Section 1.2.1 . Although the industrial users are currently not designated by the City as SIUs, their discharges can still affect treatment plant performance by influencing operational efficiency, effluent quality, and compliance with WDR Order No. R5-2014-0004.

To address these potential impacts, this Study evaluates pollutant loading from both industrial and non- industrial sources to determine whether local limits are necessary at each facility. The following sections outlines the methodology used to identify and assess POCs. This evaluation establishes the technical foundation for developing defensible local limits that protect the treatment capacity and operational integrity of both WWTFs, ensure ongoing compliance with applicable WDRs, and safeguard public health, water quality, and the environment.

Page 129 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 2 – Pollutants of Concern
5 SECTION 2 - LOCAL LIMIT DEVELOPMENT

2.1. Pollutants of Concern
The development of local limits is critical to ensuring the efficient operation of the publicly owned treatment works (POTW), protecting worker health and safety, preventing the discharge of harmful pollutants into the environment, and maintaining the qual ity of treated sludge. These limits also play a key role in ensuring compliance with discharge permits and aligning with federal, state, and local regulatory requirements. To achieve these goals, it is essential to identify and regulate POCs that have the potential to disrupt wastewater treatment processes, compromise effluent quality, or pose environmental and public health risks.

POCs are pollutants that require monitoring and control to safeguard the wastewater treatment facility, its operators, the integrity of the collection system, and the proper disposal of treated effluent and biosolids. These pollutants can contribute to pas s-through contamination, interfere with treatment processes, damage infrastructure, or affect a facility’s ability to manage and dispose of biosolids in compliance with environmental standards.

The following sections outline the criteria for determining whether a pollutant should be classified as a POC. While multiple factors may justify the inclusion of a pollutant on this list, its designation as a POC does not necessarily mean that a local limit must be established. The need for local limits is evaluated in Section 4, where a thorough assessment is conducted. If a pollutant is identified as a POC, data collection and a detailed analysis must be carried out to determine the appropriate regulator y and treatment measures needed to mitigate its impact.

2.2. EPA POCs
The EPA has designated 15 key pollutants t hat are commonly present in wastewater treatment plant effluent and biosolids. These pollutants are classified as POCs due to their potential to impact treatment processes, effluent quality, and biosolid management. As part of any local limits evaluation, these pollutants must be assessed to determine their potential risks and the need for regulatory controls. A comprehensive list of these pollutants is provided in Table 2-1.

Table 2-1 EPA POCs
Pollutant
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Cyanide
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Zinc
Molybdenum

Page 130 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 2 – Pollutants of Concern
6 Table 2-1 EPA POCs
Pollutant
Selenium
BOD5
Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
Ammonia

2.3. Waste Discharge Requirements POCs
While federally regulated pollutants remain a primary focus, both the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs are also subject to locally established pollutant control measures that account for site -specific regulatory requirements and environmental conditions. For the Domestic WWTF, WDR Order No. R5 -2014-0004 establishes effluent limitations and monitoring requirements for discharges to the onsite effluent disposal ponds. Pollutants with enforceable effluent limits under the WDR are therefore designated as POCs for this Study. Table 2 -2 presents these POCs and the corresponding most stringent effluent limitations established by the WDR.

Table 2-2 Domestic WWTF WDRs POCs
Pollutant Discharge Limitation
BOD5 (mg/L) 40
TSS (mg/L) 40
EC
1,000 umhos/cm or source
water plus 500 umhos/cm,
whichever is less
As detailed in Section 1.2.1, WDR Order No. R5-2014-0004 also defines design influent loading criteria of 224 mg/L BOD and 226 mg/L TSS, which correspond to 5,604 lbs/day and 5,655 lbs/day, respectively, at the facility’s design flow of 3.0 MGD. These design concentrations provide the technical basis for evaluating headworks loadings and will be applied in this Study to determine appropriate local limits for the Domestic WWTF.

Similar to the Domestic WWTF, the Industrial WWTF is also regulated under WDR Order No. 98-131 with a discharge limitation for EC, which may not exceed the weighted average EC of the source water plus 500 µmhos/cm. Based on 2024 monitoring of the City’s ten groundwater supply wells, the weighted average EC of the source water was 281 µmhos/cm, resulting in an effluent EC limit of 781 µmhos/cm for both the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs.

Unlike the Domestic WWTF, WDR Order No. 98 -131 does not prescribe numeric effluent limitations for BOD or TSS at the Industrial WWTF. Instead, design values identified in a 1995 Black & Veatch Memorandum provide the most appropriate benchmarks for local limits development. These design criteria specify maximum month daily average influent concentrations of 3,360 mg/L BOD and 760 mg/L TSS. At the design flow of 1.3 MGD, these concentrations correspond to loadings of 20,760 lbs/day BOD and 4,686 lbs/day TSS. Accordingly, this Study applies the maximum month daily average concentrations for BOD and TSS, in conjunction with the facility’s design flow, to establish applicable local limits for the Industrial WWTF.

Page 131 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 2 – Pollutants of Concern
7 2.4. Other Reasons for POCs
In addition to pollutants identified by federal and state regulations, certain pollutants may be classified as POCs due to their potential to impact wastewater treatment operations, environmental quality, or regulatory compliance. The evaluation of these a dditional POCs ensures that the City of Sanger’s wastewater treatment facilities can effectively manage both municipal and industrial discharges while maintaining compliance with their respective WDRs and other applicable regulatory standards.

2.4.1. Water Quality Criteria
One key factor in determining POCs is water quality criteria. Effluent from the WWTF is discharged into evaporation/percolation ponds, and any pollutants present in significant concentrations may affect groundwater quality and environmental health. Polluta nts with the potential to exceed water quality objectives or contribute to groundwater contamination must be evaluated to determine whether they require local limits.

2.4.2. Biosolids Land Application Criteria
Sludge and biosolids generated at the City of Sanger’s wastewater treatment facilities are managed in compliance with applicable state and federal regulations to ensure safe handling, disposal, and protection of public health and the environment. At the Do mestic WWTF, sludge is periodically removed from treatment units to maintain operational efficiency and is either disposed of at a permitted landfill, land - applied, or processed through other approved reuse methods. These activities are conducted in accordance with WDR Order No. R5-2014-0004, Title 40 CFR Part 503, and relevant California regulations.

Management of sludge within the treatment and storage ponds is performed by a local grower, who removes and land-applies the material on City-owned reclamation fields for beneficial reuse on a periodic basis. The City does not perform or direct these activities but conducts mid -year inspections to evaluate solids buildup and maintain compliance with operational requirements.

To maintain compliance, both WWTFs must prevent the discharge of industrial pollutants that could compromise sludge quality or result in violations of applicable disposal regulations. The national standards under 40 CFR Part 503 establish pollutant concent ration limits, operational standards, management practices, and requirements for sampling, recordkeeping, and reporting. These standards are designed to mitigate risks to human health and the environment associated with biosolids use or disposal.

The State of California has adopted the federal 40 CFR Part 503 standards and imposes additional land application restrictions under Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations. As such, pollutants regulated under these frameworks are evaluated as POCs to ensure biosolids generated at the WWTFs remain compliant with all applicable state and federal criteria for safe disposal or land application.

2.4.3. Interference and Inhibition Criteria
The EPA’s pretreatment regulations outlined in 40 CFR 403.5(a) require the prohibition of industrial discharges that could cause interference at the WWTF’s. According to the EPA, interference occurs when a discharge inhibits or disrupts the treatment process, resulting in a violation of the WWTF’s WDRs or biosolids disposal requirements. To prevent such disruptions, the EPA recommends that pollutants with a history of causing interference be classified as POCs.

Although some pollutants may not lead to effluent violations or biosolids disposal issues, they can still negatively impact WWTF operations by disrupting biological treatment processes or affecting overall

Page 132 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 2 – Pollutants of Concern
8 system performance. The EPA Local Limits Development Guidance provides information on pollutants that have inhibition concentrations for various treatment plant processes. Identifying and monitoring these pollutants is essential to ensuring that influent characteristics remain within acceptable operational thresholds, thereby preventing disruptions to treatment efficiency and regulatory compliance.

2.4.4. Protection of Treatment Works, Collection System, and Workers Explosive and flammable pollutants pose a significant risk to the integrity of the sewer collection system and the health and safety of WWTF workers. Under certain conditions, the accumulation of these substances can lead to fires or explosions, endangerin g facility operations and personnel. If industrial users are expected to discharge such pollutants, establishing local limits may be necessary to mitigate these risks and ensure safe system operation.

In addition to combustion hazards, fume toxicity levels of specific pollutants can have severe health implications for WWTF workers. Volatile organic compound (VOC) vapors are of particular concern, as they may be toxic, carcinogenic, and capable of causing chronic health effects after prolonged or repeated exposure. The EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance outlines concentration thresholds for hazardous airborne contaminants based on standards set by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA), and American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). If industrial discharges contain these pollutants at levels that could endanger workers, local limits may be required to protect both worker safety and treatment facility operations.

Page 133 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
9 SECTION 3 - DEVELOPMENT OF LOCAL DISCHARGE LIMITS
After identifying POCs for the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs (Tables 2 -1 and 2 -2) and compiling necessary sampling data, local discharge limits can be established for each facility. For pollutants directly regulated by the applicable WDRs, including BOD, TSS, and EC, local limits are based on the facility’s design capacity and effluent limitations specified in the WDRs. For pollutants without defined facility -specific design values, local limits are developed in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency’s Local Limits Development Guidance , ensuring consistent protection of treatment capacity, effluent quality, and receiving environments.

3.1. Evaluation of WDR-Based Local Limits
The following section evaluates the local limits for the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs that are specifically derived from their WDRs, focusing on BOD, TSS, and EC as the key regulated parameters.

3.1.1. Domestic WWTF Local Limit Development
For the Domestic WWTF, the local limits for BOD, TSS, and EC were derived directly from the design criteria established in WDR Order No. R5 -2014-0004. Table 3-1 presents the evaluation of current values using 2024 influent monitoring data, domestic sampling data collected from lift stations, and the average daily flow contributed by industrial users discharging to the facility. These calculations provide a breakdown of pollutant contributions between domestic and industrial sources.

Table 3-1 Evaluation of Current Values
Pollutant
2024 Domestic WWTF Influent Domestic Influent Industrial Influent Calculated Flow
(MGD)
Conc.
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
Loading
(lbs/day)
Flow
(MGD)
Conc.
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
Loading
(lbs/day)
Flow
(MGD)
Conc.
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
Loading
(lbs/day)
BOD5 1.80 243 3,649 1.71 205 2,921 0.089 984 728
Total Suspended
Solids 1.80 272 4,079 1.71 209 2,973 0.089 1,495 1,106
EC 1.80 777 11,651 1.71 724 10,320 0.089 1,798 1,331
At the average influent flow of 1.80 MGD, the WWTF received wastewater with an average BOD concentration of 243 mg/L, a TSS concentration of 272 mg/L, and an EC of 777 µmhos/cm in 2024. While the City’s Domestic WWTF primarily treats wastewater from residential and commercial sources, the facility also receives flows from four permitted industrial users. According to the City, the combined average daily discharge from these industries is 0.089 MGD. Subtracting this amount from the total influent flow yields a domestic flow of 1.71 MGD.

To characterize domestic contributions, the City collected composite samples at two lift stations that do not receive any industrial flows. The average concentrations from those sampling locations, shown in Table 3-1, represent the domestic influent values used in this evaluation. Industrial contributions for BOD, TSS, and EC were then calculated by subtracting the domestic influent loadings (expressed in lbs/day) from the total WWTF influent loadings. This approach provides an estimate of the pollutant loa dings attributable to industrial discharges, ensuring that the resulting local limits reflect both actual operating conditions and the design basis of the facility.

Page 134 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
10 The Domestic WWTF is designed to treat an average daily flow of 3.0 MGD with design influent concentrations of 224 mg/L BOD, 226 mg/L TSS, and 781 µmhos/cm EC. At 3.0 MGD, these concentrations correspond to design loadings of 5,604 lbs/day BOD, 5,655 lbs/day TSS, and 19,533 lbs/day EC. Given that the current domestic flow is approximately 1.71 MGD, the City projects domestic flows will increase by about 35 percent, reaching approximately 2.63 MGD at buildout. The remaining portion of the 3.0 MGD design flow, approximately 0.37 MGD, is therefore allocated to industrial users.

Table 3-2 presents the corresponding design loadings for BOD, TSS, and EC, along with the estimated division of capacity between residential and industrial sources.

Table 3-2 Domestic WWTF Design Loadings and Allocations Pollutant
Domestic WWTF Design
Flow
(MGD)
Concentration
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
WWTF
Total
Loading
(lbs/day)
Residential
Loading
(lbs/day)(1)
Industrial
Loading
(lbs./day)(2)
BOD5 3 224 5,604 4,494 1,111
Total Suspended Solids 3 226 5,655 4,574 1,081
EC 3 781 19,533 15,877 3,656
Notes:
(1)Residential Loading values were calculated by applying the current pollutant concentrations (Table 3-1) to the estimated residential flow capacity of 2.63 MGD. (2)Industrial Loading values represent the remaining portion of the total WWTF design loading, determined as the difference between the WWTF Total Loading and the Residential Loading.

Using the estimated design flow rate and loadings allocated to industrial users determined in Table 3-2, the appropriate local limits for BOD, TSS, and EC at the Domestic WWTF can now be established. Table 3- 3 presents the proposed industrial local limits and the corresponding spare design capacity. Spare capacity represents the remaining industrial loading available after applying the proposed limits and was calculated by subtracting the proposed industrial loading (expressed in lbs/day at 0.089 MGD) from the total industrial allocation defined by the facility’s design capacity. For example, the Domestic WWTF is designed to accommodate 1,111 lbs/day of industrial BOD. At the proposed local limit of 500 mg/L and an industrial flow of 0.089 MGD, existing users would contribute approximately 370 lbs/day, leaving 741 lbs/day unused capacity. This margin ensures that the facility can absorb fluctuations in industrial loading and still remain within design specifications. The same calculation was applied to TSS an d EC, yielding spare capacities of 711 lbs/day and 2,916 lbs/day, at the proposed limit of 500 mg/L and 1,000 µmhos/cm, respectively.

Page 135 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
11 Table 3-3 Domestic WWTF Proposed Industrial Local Limits and Spare Capacity Pollutant
Available Design
Capacity Proposed Local Limit Spare Design
Capacity
Industrial
Flow
(MGD)
Industrial
Loading
(lbs/day)
Industrial
Flow
(MGD)
Industrial
Concentration
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
Industrial
Loading
(lbs/day)
Industrial
Flow
(MGD)
Industrial
Loading
(lbs/day)

BOD5 0.37 1,111 0.089 500 370 0.178 741
Total Suspended Solids 0.37 1,081 0.089 500 370 0.170 711 EC 0.37 3,656 0.089 1000 740 0.350 2,916
In addition to pollutant-specific spare capacity, the proposed limits allow the City to accept approximately

0.170 MGD of additional industrial flow, nearly double the current industrial contribution of 0.089 MGD.

This demonstrates that the proposed limits not only protect the WWTF’s treatment performance and compliance with WDR Order No. R5 -2014-0004 but also preserves sufficient capacity to accommodate reasonable future industrial growth.

The proposed local limits are ultimately consistent with the WWTF’s WDRs and design capacity, keeping industrial discharges within the established treatment and disposal capabilities of the Domestic WWTF.

The concentrations proposed for BOD, TSS, and EC are achievable for industrial users, while also providing a conservative margin that protects the facility’s biological treatment processes, compliance with effluent limitations, and long -term operational reliability. In addition, mai ntaining a substantial p ortion of the industrial allocation as spare design capacity preserves flexibility for existing and future industrial contributors and reduces the risk of noncompliance. Together, these factors ensure that the proposed limits balance operational protection , regulatory requirements, and equitable allocation of treatment capacity between residential and industrial users.

3.1.2. Industrial WWTF Local Limit Development
For the Industrial WWTF, design criteria for BOD, TSS, and EC are derived from WDR Order No. 98 -131 and the 1995 Black & Veatch design memorandum, which establishes the governing design flow and loading capacities used in developing proposed local limits. The facility is designed to treat an average daily flow of 1.3 MGD. According to records from 2021 to 2024, the WWTF received an average influent flow of 0.842 MGD, while the 30-day maximum daily average reached approximately 1.07 MGD. In 2024, the 30 -day maximum daily average was 0.993 MGD. Wastewater discharges from Pitman Farms are relatively consistent, while discharges from Gibson Winery are seasonal and vary with production cycles.

Accordingly, the evaluation of proposed local limits is based on the 30-day maximum daily average rather than the overall average daily flow.

Table 3 -4 summarizes influent monitoring data for the Industrial WWTF during 2024. At a 30 -day maximum daily average flow of 0.993 MGD, wastewater received from Pitman Farms and Gibson Winery contained an average BOD concentration of 1,160 mg/L, equivalent to 9,606 lbs/day. TSS average 477 mg/L, or 3,951 lbs/day, while EC average 1,015 µmhos/cm, corresponding to 8,403 lbs/day. These values establish the WWTF’s current operating conditions and provide the basis for comparison with the facility’s design capacity.

Page 136 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
12 Table 3-4 Industrial WWTF Current Influent Conditions (2024) Pollutant Flow
(MGD)
Concentration
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
Loading
(lbs/day)

BOD5 0.993 1,160 9,606
Total Suspended Solids 0.993 477 3,951
EC 0.993 1,015 8,403
As previously stated, WDR Order No. 98-131 does not prescribe numeric effluent limitations for BOD or TSS. Instead, design values from the 1995 Black & Veatch memorandum establish maximum month daily average concentrations of 3,360 mg/L BOD₅ and 760 mg/L TSS, equivalent to 36,429 lbs/day and 8,240 lbs/day, respectively, at the design flow of 1.3 MGD. For EC, WDR Order No. 98-131 specifies that influent shall not exceed the weighted average EC of the source water plus 500 µmhos/cm. Based on groundwater monitoring of the City’s supply wells, this requirement translates to an influent EC limit of 781 µmhos/cm, or 8,468 lbs/day.

Table 3 -5 compares these design flow and loading capacities with actual influent monitoring data collected in 2024. The difference between the design allocation and observed loadings defines the available spare capacity for each pollutant. Results show substantial reserves for BOD (26,823 lbs/day) and TSS (4,289 lbs/day), but a minimal margin for EC (64 lbs/day). This comparison demonstrates that while the facility can accommodate additional organic and solids loadings, EC is operating near its design threshold and therefore requires more careful management in establishing local limits.

Table 3-5 Industrial WWTF Design, 2024 Influent Loadings, and Spare Capacity Pollutant
WWTF Design WWTF Influent (2024 Data)
Spare
Capacity
(lbs/day)
Flow
(MGD)
Concentration
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
Loading
(lbs/day)
Flow
(MGD)
Concentration
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
lbs/day
Loading
(lbs/day)
BOD5 1.3 3,360 36,429 0.993 1,160 9,606 26,823
Total Suspended Solids 1.3 760 8,240 0.993 477 3,951 4,289 EC 1.3 781 8,468 0.993 1,015 8,403 64
Table 3-6 outlines the proposed industrial local limits for BOD, TSS, and EC at the Industrial WWTF. The proposed limits are expressed as concentrations at the full design flow of 1.3 MGD and translated to equivalent mass loadings in lbs/day. The spare design capacity shown represents the remaining pollutant loading that the facility could accept beyond the proposed limits, thereby maintaining a margin of safety for variability in industrial discharges and potential future growth.

Page 137 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
13 Table 3-6 Industrial WWTF Proposed Industrial Local Limits and Spare Capacity Pollutant
WWTF Design Proposed Local Limit Spare Design Capacity
Flow
(MGD)
Loading
(lbs/day)
Flow
(MGD)
Conc.
(mg/L,
µmhos/cm)
Loading
(lbs/day)
Flow
(MGD)
Loading
(lbs/day)

BOD5 1.30 36,429 1.30 1,000 10,842 3.07 25,587
Total Suspended Solids 1.30 8,240 1.30 600 6,505 0.35 1,735 EC 1.30 8,468 1.30 700 7,589 0.15 878
As shown, the proposed limits preserve substantial spare capacity for BOD (25,587 lbs/day) and TSS (1,735 lbs/day), ensuring that the facility can continue to accommodate increases in organic and solids loadings without exceeding design parameters. However, the margin for EC is more limited (878 lbs/day), highlighting the need for careful monitoring and management of salinity to maintain compliance with WDR Order No. 98-131 In terms of flow, the most restrictive spare capacity is associated with EC, which allows for an additional 0.15 MGD of industrial discharge. This value represents the maximum additional flow the facility can reliably accept without surpassing its design allocation for EC . Collectively, these proposed limits align with the facility’s design criteria and protect treatment performance.

3.2. Evaluation of Local Limits Using EPA Guidance
While the previous section focused on pollutants regulated under the Domestic and Industrial WWTF’s WDRs, this approach does not address all pollutants that may impair treatment plant operations, biosolids quality, or affect downstream water quality. To establish comprehensive and defensible local limits, this Study also applies the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Local Limits Development Guidance.

Under this methodology, treatment plant removal efficiencies are quantified and evaluated alongside factors such as water quality standards, biosolids disposal requirements, and process inhibition thresholds. These evaluations are used to calculate Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings (MAHLs), which represent the maximum pollutant loading that can be introduced to a WWTF without causing pass- through, interference, or violations of applicable regulatory standards. The following procedures are used to establish MAHLs for each POC at the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs:

1. Determine the WWTF-specific removal efficiencies for each POC, based on representative influent and effluent data;

2. Calculate the Allowable Headworks Loadings (AHLs) using environmental criteria applicable to each facility, such as Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs), water quality standards, biosolids disposal limits, and biological inhibition thresholds;

3. Identify the MAHL as the lowest (most conservative) of the calculated AHLs to ensure adequate protection of treatment processes, receiving waters, sludge management practices, and worker safety.

This section presents the application of the EPA guidance to the City’s Domestic and Industrial WWTFs.

The results provide the technical foundation for determining whether additional local limits are warranted beyond those imposed by WDRs and ensure that industrial discharges are protective of public health, water quality, and the long-term operational integrity of the City’s treatment facilities.

Page 138 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
14 3.2.1. WWTF Removal Efficiencies
At both the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs, POCs are monitored to evaluate treatment performance and demonstrate compliance with regulatory requirements. At the Industrial WWTF, monitoring focuses on EC and BOD because of their significance to salinity management and organic loading strength. At the Domestic WWTF, monitoring also includes TSS, as required by the facility’s WDRs. As discussed in Section

3.1, BOD, TSS, and EC have already been evaluated under applicable WDRs and the facility’s design capacity and are not reassessed here under the EPA methodology.

At the Domestic WWTF, ammonia is also a POC that is routinely monitored, and sufficient site -specific data are available to calculate removal efficiency. However, aside from ammonia, the City does not collect paired influent and effluent data for the other POCs identified in Table 2 -1. In these cases, pollutant removal efficiencies were assigned using the default values provided in Appendix R of the U.S. EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance. These default values represent typical removal rates for activa ted sludge systems and are widely recognized as appropriate for developing technically defensible local limits.

By incorporating both site-specific data where available and EPA-recommended default values where data are lacking, the City can calculate MAHLs for each POC in a manner consistent with federal guidance, while ensuring protection of treatment processes, bi osolids quality, and receiving water standards. Table 3 -7 summarizes the pollutant removal efficiencies applied for both the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs.

Table 3-7 Summary of Removal Efficiencies
POCs
Industrial WWTF
Removal
Efficiency
Domestic WWTF
Removal
Efficiency
Arsenic(1) 45% 45%
Cadmium(1) 67% 67%
Chromium(1) 82% 82%
Copper(1) 86% 86%
Cyanide(1) 69% 69%
Lead(1) 61% 61%
Mercury(1) 60% 60%
Nickel(1) 42% 42%
Silver(1) 75% 75%
Zinc(1) 79% 79%
Molybdenum(1) 63% 63%
Selenium(1) 50% 50%
Ammonia(2) 0% 34%
Notes:
(1)Priority pollutant percent removal efficiencies through activated sludge treatment as recommended by the 2004 USEPA Local Limits Guidance.

Page 139 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
15 Table 3-7 Summary of Removal Efficiencies
POCs
Industrial WWTF
Removal
Efficiency
Domestic WWTF
Removal
Efficiency
(2)For the Industrial WWTF, no effluent data results available to calculate removal efficiency.

3.2.2. Allowable Headworks Loadings
After quantifying pollutant removal efficiencies for the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs, the next step in the local limits development process is to calculate AHLs. AHLs represent the maximum pollutant loadings that can be introduced to a treatment facility without causing pass-through, interference, or violations of applicable environmental criteria. These criteria include state and federal water quality standards, sludge disposal limitations, and biological process inhibition thresholds. By evaluating AHLs for POC, the City can determine the level of influent loading that each facility can reliably accept while ensuring protection of groundwater quality, biosolids management, and treatment system performance. The following subsections present the calculated AHLs for both facilities, categorized by water quality, sludge disposal, and inhibition-based criteria.

3.2.2.1. Water Quality Standard
For POCs without enforceable permit limits , the U.S. EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance recommends calculating AHLs using state or federal water quality standards. These standards may be based on aquatic life protection criteria for both acute (short-term) and chronic (long-term) exposure, or on human health protection criteria such as drink ing water consumption, recreational use, or fish ingestion.

Although the WDRs for both the Domestic and Industrial WWTFs do not authorize surface water discharges, they require that all discharges remain protective of underlying groundwater basin, as this groundwater is designated for municipal and domestic supply, agricultural supply, and industrial service supply. Accordingly, in developing local limits, the water quality standards applied must be consistent with these designated beneficial uses. For POCs with applicable water quality criteria, AHLs are calculated using the methodology presented in Equation 1.

Equation 1 – AHL based on Water Quality limits:

AHL𝑊𝑄 =
(8.34)[(𝐶𝑊𝑄) ∗ (𝑄𝑆𝑇𝑅+𝑄𝑊𝑊𝑇𝐹) − (𝐶𝑆𝑇𝑅 ∗ 𝑄𝑆𝑇𝑅)]
1 − 𝑅𝑊𝑊𝑇𝑃

Where:

AHLWQ = AHL based on water quality criteria, lb/day
CWQ = State or Federal water quality standard, mg/L
CSTR = Receiving stream background concentration, mg/L
QWWTF = WWTF average flow rate, MGD
QSTR = Receiving stream (upstream) flow rate, MGD

Page 140 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
16 RWWTF = Plant removal efficiency, as decimal

8.34 = Conversion factor
Using Equation 1, t he individual chronic, acute, agricultural, and human health AHLs for each pollutant have been consolidated into a single summary table for each facility, presented in Tables 3-8 and 3-9.

Page 141 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
17 Table 3-8 Industrial WWTF – Water Quality Standard AHLs Pollutant
WWTF
Flow
(MGD)
(QWWTF)
Receiving
Stream
Flow
(MGD)
(QSTR)
Receiving
Stream
Conc.
(mg/L)
(CSTR)
Water Quality Standard (mg/L) (CWQ)
Removal
Efficiency
(RWWTF)
Allowable Headworks Loading (lbs/day)
Chronic(1) Acute(1) Agricultural(2) Human
Health(1) Chronic Acute Agricultural Human
Health

Arsenic 0.71 0 0.01 0.15 0.34 0.1 0.01 45% 1.628 3.691 1.086 0.109 Cadmium 0.71 0 0.00 0.0022 0.0043 0.01 0.005 67% 0.039 0.077 0.179 0.090 Chromium 0.71 0 0.00 0.01 0.016 0.1 0.01 82% 0.362 0.526 3.290 0.329 Copper 0.71 0 0.23 0.009 0.013 0.2 1.3 86% 0.381 0.550 8.460 54.987 Cyanide 0.71 0 0.00 0.0052 0.022 - 0.15 69% 0.099 0.420 - 2.865 Lead 0.71 0 0.03 0.0025 0.065 5 0.015 61% 0.038 0.987 75.919 0.228 Mercury 0.71 0 0.00 0.00077 0.0014 - 0.002 60% 0.011 0.021 - 0.030 Nickel 0.71 0 0.01 0.052 0.47 0.2 0.1 42% 0.531 4.799 2.042 1.021 Silver 0.71 0 0.00 - 0.0034 - - 75% - 0.081 - -
Zinc 0.71 0 0.24 0.12 0.12 2 - 79% 3.384 3.384 56.397 - Molybdenum 0.71 0 0.003 - - 0.01 - 63% - - 0.160 -
Selenium 0.71 0 0.01 0.005 - 0.02 0.05 50% 0.059 - 0.237 0.592 Ammonia 0.71 0 5.70 - - - 30 0% - - - 177.650
Notes:
(1)National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Priority Pollutants as reported in Appendix D of the EPA Local Limits Development Guidance. (2)California water quality-based assessment thresholds published by the State Water Resources Control Board at the following website:
www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/water_quality_goals.

Page 142 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
18 Table 3-9 Domestic WWTF – Water Quality Standard AHLs Pollutant
WWTF
Flow
(MGD)
(QWWTF)
Receiving
Stream
Flow
(MGD)
(QSTR)
Receiving
Stream
Conc.
(mg/L)
(CSTR)
Water Quality Standard (mg/L) (CWQ)
Removal
Efficiency
(RWWTF)
Allowable Headworks Loading (lbs/day)
Chronic(1) Acute(1) Agricultural(2) Human
Health(3) Chronic Acute Agricultural Human
Health

Arsenic 1.80 0 0.003 0.15 0.34 0.1 0.01 45% 4.122 9.342 2.748 0.275 Cadmium 1.80 0 0.000 0.0022 0.0043 0.01 0.005 67% 0.100 0.195 0.454 0.227 Chromium 1.80 0 0.005 0.01 0.016 0.1 0.01 82% 0.916 1.332 8.327 0.833 Copper 1.80 0 0.059 0.009 0.013 0.2 1.3 86% 0.964 1.392 21.413 139.183 Cyanide 1.80 0 0.003 0.0052 0.022 - 0.15 69% 0.251 1.064 - 7.253 Lead 1.80 0 0.002 0.0025 0.065 5 0.015 61% 0.096 2.498 192.165 0.576 Mercury 1.80 0 0.000 0.00077 0.0014 - 0.002 60% 0.029 0.052 - 0.075 Nickel 1.80 0 0.005 0.052 0.47 0.2 0.1 42% 1.344 12.146 5.169 2.584 Silver 1.80 0 0.003 - 0.0034 - - 75% - 0.204 - -
Zinc 1.80 0 0.229 0.12 0.12 2 - 79% 8.565 8.565 142.751 - Molybdenum 1.80 0 0.003 - - 0.01 - 63% - - 0.405 -
Selenium 1.80 0 0.007 0.005 - 0.02 0.05 50% 0.150 - 0.600 1.499 Ammonia 1.80 0 832.86 - - - 30 34% - - - 677.643
Notes:
(1)National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for Priority Pollutants as reported in Appendix D of the EPA Local Limits Development Guidance. (2)California water quality-based assessment thresholds published by the State Water Resources Control Board at the following website:
www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/water_quality_goals.

Page 143 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
19 Table 3-10 presents the summary of water quality -based AHLs for the Industrial WWTF. The most restrictive (i.e., lowest) calculated AHL for each POC is selected as the final AHL to ensure protection of water quality objectives.

Table 3-10 Industrial WWTF – Summary of Water Quality Standard AHLs Pollutant
Allowable
Headworks
(Chronic)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Acute)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Agricultural)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Human Health)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Water Quality)
(lbs/day)

Arsenic 1.63 3.69 1.09 0.11 0.11
Cadmium 0.04 0.08 0.18 0.09 0.04
Chromium 0.36 0.53 3.29 0.33 0.33
Copper 0.38 0.55 8.46 54.99 0.38
Cyanide 0.10 0.42 - 2.87 0.10
Lead 0.04 0.99 75.92 0.23 0.04
Mercury 0.01 0.02 - 0.03 0.01
Nickel 0.53 4.80 2.04 1.02 0.53
Silver - 0.08 - - 0.08
Zinc 3.38 3.38 56.40 - 3.38
Molybdenum - - 0.16 - 0.16
Selenium 0.06 - 0.24 0.59 0.06
Ammonia - - - 177.65 177.65
Table 3-11 presents the summary of water quality-based AHLs for Domestic WWTF. As with the Industrial WWTF, the most conservative AHL value for each POC is identified and selected to maintain compliance with applicable water quality standards.

Table 3-11 Domestic WWTF – Summary of Water Quality Standard AHLs Pollutant
Allowable
Headworks
(Chronic)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Acute)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Agricultural)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Human Health)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Water Quality)
(lbs/day)

Arsenic 4.12 9.34 2.75 0.27 0.27
Cadmium 0.10 0.20 0.45 0.23 0.10
Chromium 0.92 1.33 8.33 0.83 0.83
Copper 0.96 1.39 21.41 139.18 0.96
Cyanide 0.25 1.06 - 7.25 0.25
Lead 0.10 2.50 192.17 0.58 0.10
Mercury 0.03 0.05 - 0.07 0.03
Nickel 1.34 12.15 5.17 2.58 1.34
Silver - 0.20 - - 0.20

Page 144 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
20 Table 3-11 Domestic WWTF – Summary of Water Quality Standard AHLs Pollutant
Allowable
Headworks
(Chronic)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Acute)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Agricultural)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Human Health)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Water Quality)
(lbs/day)

Zinc 8.57 8.57 142.75 - 8.57
Molybdenum - - 0.41 - 0.41
Selenium 0.15 - 0.60 1.50 0.15
Ammonia - - - 677.64 677.64
According to WDR Order No. 98-131, biosolids generated at the Industrial WWTF are to be managed on- site. Sludge that accumulates in the treatment and storage ponds is removed at the discretion of a local grower and land-applied for agricultural purposes on City-owned reclamation fields, consistent with Title 27 of the California Code of Regulations and with the Regional Water Quality Control Board approval. The City does not oversee sludge removal or application activities but conducts mid-year monitoring to assess solids accumulation levels.

At the Domestic WWTF, as specified in WDR Order No. R5 -2014-0004, biosolids are managed through a mechanical dewatering process. Sludge is thickened and dewatered using a centrifuge, then further dried in 14 lined, paved drying beds equipped with underdrains. The underdrains return collected decant to the treatment process for additional treatment. Once dried, biosolids are temporarily stored in a holding bin prior to being hauled offsite for land application at a permitted facility, while screenings and grit from the headworks are transported to a local landfill. Under current operations, solids removed from the Industrial WWTF primary clarifier are conveyed to the Domestic WWTF drying beds for dewatering, while settled solids within the Industrial treatment and storage ponds are managed separately by a local growe r for land application on City-owned reclamation fields.

Federal regulations for sludge disposal (40 CFR Part 503) continue to apply, establishing limits on metals and other pollutants that may be present in biosolids due to industrial contributions. For local limits development, these regulatory thresholds are translated into AHLs for POCs using Equation 2 , which is based on Equation 5.9 from the EPA’s 2004 Local Limits Development Guidance manual. This ensures that the combined biosolids generated by both WWTFs remain suitable for land application and compliant with all applicable state and federal requirements.

Equation 2 – AHL based on Sludge Land Application and Surface Disposal:

AHL𝑆𝐿𝐷𝐺 = (0.0022)(𝐶𝐵𝑆𝑂𝐿)(𝑄𝐵𝑆𝑂𝐿)
𝑅𝑊𝑊𝑇𝑃

Where:

AHLSLDG = AHL based on sludge, lb/day
C BSOL = Biosolids limitation, mg/kg dry sludge
Q BSOL = Total sludge flow to disposal, dry metric tons per day RWWTF = Plant removal efficiency, as decimal

Page 145 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
21 GSLDG = Specific gravity of sludge, kg/L

0.0022 = Conversion factor
For Equation 2, QBSOL represents the total sludge flow to disposal in dry metric tons per day. In this study, QBSOL is estimated from the daily BOD removed at each facility and then converted to dry metric tons per day. The formula for estimating BOD removal is based on calculating the difference between the influent and effluent organic loads entering and leaving the treatment facility. First, the influent and effluent BOD concentrations, measured in milligrams per liter, are converted to mass loadings in pounds per day using the standard conversion factor of 8.34, multiplied by the plant flow in MGD. The amount of BOD removed is then determined by subtracting the effluent load from the influent load, with the result representing the daily mass of BOD reduced through treatment. To translate this value into an estimate of sludge production, the pounds of BOD removed are converted to dry metric tons per day by dividing by 2,204.62.

Table 3-12 presents the biosolids disposal based AHLs for the Industrial WWTF.

Table 3-12 Industrial WWTF – Summary of Biosolids Disposal Based AHLs Pollutant
Sludge Flow
to Disposal
(MTD) (QBSOL)
Land Application
Standard
(mg/kg) (CBSOL)(1)
Removal
Efficiency
(RWWTF)
Allowable
Headworks
(lbs/day)

Arsenic 0.39 41 45% 0.08
Cadmium 0.39 39 67% 0.05
Chromium 0.39 - 82% -
Copper 0.39 1500 86% 1.49
Cyanide 0.39 - 69% -
Lead 0.39 300 61% 0.42
Mercury 0.39 17 60% 0.02
Nickel 0.39 420 42% 0.86
Silver 0.39 - 75% -
Zinc 0.39 - 79% -
Molybdenum 0.39 - 63% -
Selenium 0.39 100 50% 0.17
Ammonia 0.39 - 0% -
Notes:
(1)Based on Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 503 Table 3 of Section 503.13

Table 3 -13 presents the biosolids disposal –based AHLs for the Domestic WWTF. In 2024, operational issues at the facility resulted in effluent BOD values exceeding influent levels, making the data unsuitable for solids estimation. Accordingly, the calculation of QBSOL is based on 2023 influent and effluent BOD and flow data, which provided more reliable results.

Page 146 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
22 Table 3-13 Domestic WWTF – Summary of Biosolids Disposal Based AHLs Pollutant
Sludge Flow
to Disposal
(MTD) (QBSOL)
Land Application
Standard
(mg/kg) (CBSOL)(1)
Removal
Efficiency
(RWWTF)
Allowable
Headworks
(lbs/day)

Arsenic 1.19 41 45% 0.24
Cadmium 1.19 39 67% 0.15
Chromium 1.19 - 82% -
Copper 1.19 1500 86% 4.58
Cyanide 1.19 - 69% -
Lead 1.19 300 61% 1.29
Mercury 1.19 17 60% 0.07
Nickel 1.19 420 42% 2.63
Silver 1.19 - 75% -
Zinc 1.19 - 79% -
Molybdenum 1.19 - 63% -
Selenium 1.19 100 50% 0.53
Ammonia 1.19 - 34% -
Notes:
(1)Based on Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 503 Table 3 of Section 503.13

3.2.2.2. Inhibition Based AHLs
Elevated concentrations of specific pollutants in wastewater or sludge can adversely impact the performance of biological treatment processes typically employed at wastewater treatment facilities.

Both the Industrial and Domestic WWTFs rely on activated sl udge systems that are particularly sensitive to inhibitory substances. Although there have been no documented operational upsets at either facility attributed to inhibitory pollutants, the potential for such impacts warrants a conservative approach.

Therefore, inhibition -based AHLs are calculated as a preventive measure to safeguard treatment performance.

In accordance with the U.S. EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance, inhibition threshold values are used in estimating AHLs for pollutants of concern. These values are derived from literature -based inhibition concentrations and are applied using Equation 3 from the EPA guidance. The calculations incorporate relevant removal efficiencies and site -specific influent data. The corresponding threshold values are included in Appendix G of the EPA guidance. By incorporating inhibition-based AHLs, the City ensures that local limits remain technically defensible and protective of both facilities’ biological treatment systems.

Equation 3 – AHL based on Activated Sludge Inhibition Values:

AHL𝐴𝐶𝑇 = (8.34)(𝐶𝐴𝐶𝑇)(𝑄𝑊𝑊𝑇𝐹)
1 − 𝑅𝑊𝑊𝑇𝑃

Where:

Page 147 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
23 AHLACT = AHL based on activated sludge inhibition, lb/day CACT = Inhibition or nitrification criterion for activated sludge, mg/L (EPA Local Limits Development Guidance, Appendix G)
QWWTF = WWTF average flow rate, MGD
RWWTF = Plant removal efficiency, as decimal

8.34 = Conversion factor
Table 3 -14 presents the calculated AHLs for the Industrial WWTF, based on inhibition thresholds for activated sludge and nitrification processes.

Table 3-14 Industrial WWTF – Activated Sludge and Nitrification Inhibition Based AHLs Pollutant
WWTF
Flow
(MGD)
(QWWTF)
Inhibition Level
Removal
Efficiency
(RWWTF)
Allowable Headworks
Activated
Sludge
(mg/L)
(CACT)(1)
Nitrification
(mg/L) (CCRIT)(2)
Activated
Sludge
(lbs/day)
Nitrification
(lbs/day)

Arsenic 0.710 0.1 1.5 45% 1.09 16.28
Cadmium 0.710 1 5.2 67% 17.94 93.31
Chromium 0.710 1 0.25 82% 32.90 8.22
Copper 0.710 1 0.05 86% 42.30 2.11
Cyanide 0.710 0.1 0.34 69% 1.91 6.49
Lead 0.710 1 0.5 61% 15.18 7.59
Mercury 0.710 0.1 - 60% 1.48 -
Nickel 0.710 - 0.25 42% - 2.55
Silver 0.710 - - 75% - -
Zinc 0.710 0.3 0.08 79% 8.46 2.26
Molybdenum 0.710 - - 63% - -
Selenium 0.710 - - 50% - -
Ammonia 0.710 480 - 0% 2,842.39 -
Notes:
(1)Based on the reported range of Activated Sludge Inhibition Threshold Levels as reported in Appendix G of the EPA Local Limits Development Guidance.
(2)Based on the reported range of Nitrification Inhibition Threshold Levels as reported in Appendix G of the EPA Local Limits Development Guidance.

Table 3-15 presents the calculated AHLs for the Domestic WWTF, derived using inhibition thresholds for activated sludge and nitrification processes, consistent with the methodology applied for the Industrial WWTF in Table 3-14.

Page 148 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
24 Table 3-15 Domestic WWTF – Activated Sludge and Nitrification Inhibition Based AHLs Pollutant
WWTF
Flow
(MGD)
(QWWTF)
Inhibition Level
Removal
Efficiency
(RWWTF)
Allowable Headworks
Activated
Sludge
(mg/L)
(CACT)(1)
Nitrification
(mg/L)
(CCRIT)(2)
Activated
Sludge
(lbs/day)
Nitrification
(lbs/day)

Arsenic 1.80 0.1 1.5 45% 2.75 41.22
Cadmium 1.80 1 5.2 67% 45.42 236.19
Chromium 1.80 1 0.25 82% 83.27 20.82
Copper 1.80 1 0.05 86% 107.06 5.35
Cyanide 1.80 0.1 0.34 69% 4.84 16.44
Lead 1.80 1 0.5 61% 38.43 19.22
Mercury 1.80 0.1 - 60% 3.75 -
Nickel 1.80 - 0.25 42% - 6.46
Silver 1.80 - - 75% - -
Zinc 1.80 0.3 0.08 79% 21.41 5.71
Molybdenum 1.80 - - 63% - -
Selenium 1.80 - - 50% - -
Ammonia 1.80 480 - 34% 10,842.28 -
Notes:
(1)Based on the reported range of Activated Sludge Inhibition Threshold Levels as reported in Appendix G of the EPA Local Limits Development Guidance.
(2)Based on the reported range of Nitrification Inhibition Threshold Levels as reported in Appendix G of the EPA Local Limits Development Guidance.

Table 3 -16 summarizes the inhibition -based AHLs calculated for the Industrial WWTF, with the most restrictive (i.e., lowest) loading identified for each POC.

Table 3-16 Industrial WWTF – Summary Inhibition Based AHLs Pollutant
Allowable
Headworks
(Activated Sludge)
(lbs/day)
Allowable Headworks
(Nitrification) (lbs/day)
Most Stringent
Inhibition/AHL
(lbs/day)

Arsenic 1.09 16.28 1.09
Cadmium 17.94 93.31 17.94
Chromium 32.90 8.22 8.22
Copper 42.30 2.11 2.11
Cyanide 1.91 6.49 1.91
Lead 15.18 7.59 7.59
Mercury 1.48 - 1.48
Nickel - 2.55 2.55

Page 149 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
25 Silver - - 0.00
Zinc 8.46 2.26 2.26
Molybdenum - - -
Selenium - - -
Ammonia 2,842.39 - 2,842.39
Table 3-17 presents a summary of the inhibition -based AHLs for the Domestic WWTF, highlighting the lowest allowable loading selected for each POC.

Table 3-17 Domestic WWTF – Summary Inhibition Based AHLs Pollutant
Allowable
Headworks
(Activated Sludge)
(lbs/day)
Allowable Headworks
(Nitrification) (lbs/day)
Most Stringent
Inhibition/AHL
(lbs/day)

Arsenic 2.75 41.22 2.75
Cadmium 45.42 236.19 45.42
Chromium 83.27 20.82 20.82
Copper 107.06 5.35 5.35
Cyanide 4.84 16.44 4.84
Lead 38.43 19.22 19.22
Mercury 3.75 - 3.75
Nickel - 6.46 6.46
Silver - - 0.00
Zinc 21.41 5.71 5.71
Molybdenum - - -
Selenium - - -
Ammonia 10,842.28 - 10,842.28

3.2.3. Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings
The MAHL for each POC is defined as the most conservative, or lowest, value among the calculated AHLs derived from applicable environmental and treatment-based criteria. These criteria include water quality standards, sludge disposal regulations, and process inhibition thresholds. By maintaining influent loadings below the MAHL, the treatment facilities can ensure compliance with all relevant regulatory and operational requirements. Table 3 -18 summarizes the AHLs evaluated for each POC and identifies the corresponding MAHL selected for the Industrial WWTF.

Table 3-18 Industrial WWTF – Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings Pollutant
Allowable
Headworks (Water
Quality) (lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks (Sludge)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Inhibition)
(lbs/day)
Maximum
Allowable
Headworks
(lbs/day)

Arsenic 0.11 0.08 1.09 0.08

Page 150 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
26 Table 3-18 Industrial WWTF – Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings Pollutant
Allowable
Headworks (Water
Quality) (lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks (Sludge)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Inhibition)
(lbs/day)
Maximum
Allowable
Headworks
(lbs/day)

Cadmium 0.04 0.05 17.94 0.04
Chromium 0.33 - 8.22 0.33
Copper 0.38 1.49 2.11 0.38
Cyanide 0.10 - 1.91 0.10
Lead 0.04 0.42 7.59 0.04
Mercury 0.01 0.02 1.48 0.01
Nickel 0.53 0.86 2.55 0.53
Silver 0.08 - 0.00 0.00
Zinc 3.38 - 2.26 2.26
Molybdenum 0.16 - - 0.16
Selenium 0.06 0.17 - 0.06
Ammonia 177.65 - 2842.39 177.65
Table 3 -19 summarizes the calculated AHLs for each POC at the Domestic WWTF and identifies the corresponding MAHL based on the most conservative applicable criteria.

Table 3-19 Domestic WWTF – Maximum Allowable Headworks Loadings Pollutant
Allowable
Headworks (Water
Quality) (lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks (Sludge)
(lbs/day)
Allowable
Headworks
(Inhibition)
(lbs/day)
Maximum
Allowable
Headworks
(lbs/day)

Arsenic 0.27 0.24 2.75 0.24
Cadmium 0.10 0.15 45.42 0.10
Chromium 0.83 - 20.82 0.83
Copper 0.96 4.58 5.35 0.96
Cyanide 0.25 - 4.84 0.25
Lead 0.10 1.29 19.22 0.10
Mercury 0.03 0.07 3.75 0.03
Nickel 1.34 2.63 6.46 1.34
Silver 0.20 - 0.00 0.00
Zinc 8.57 - 5.71 5.71
Molybdenum 0.41 - - 0.41
Selenium 0.15 0.53 - 0.15
Ammonia 677.64 - 10,842.28 677.64

Page 151 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
27 3.2.4. Designating Local Limits
Following the calculation of the MAHLs for each POC, the next step is to identify which POCs require the development of local limits. In accordance with the EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance, local limits should be established for any POC where the average influent loading exceeds 60% of its respective MAHL.

Tables 3-20 and 3-21 present comparisons of the calculated MAHLs and the average influent loadings for each POC at the Industrial and Domestic WWTFs, respectively. Pollutants exceeding the 60% thr eshold are flagged for further evaluation and the development of site -specific local limits to ensure compliance and protect treatment processes.

Table 3-20 Industrial WWTF - Comparison of MAHLs with Average Headworks Loadings Pollutant
Maximum
Allowable
Headworks
(lbs/day)
Average Influent
Loading (lbs/day)
Average Percent
Loaded
New Local Limit
Required?

Arsenic 0.08 0.03 38% No
Cadmium 0.04 0.00 8% No
Chromium 0.33 0.02 6% No
Copper 0.38 1.38 363% Yes
Cyanide 0.10 0.02 24% Yes
Lead 0.04 0.20 515% Yes
Mercury 0.01 0.001 10% No
Nickel 0.53 0.03 6% No
Silver 0.00 0.02 0% No
Zinc 2.26 1.43 63% Yes
Molybdenum 0.16 0.01 9% No
Selenium 0.06 0.06 100% Yes
Ammonia 177.65 33.75 19% No
Table 3-21 presents a comparison of the calculated MAHLs and average influent loadings for each POC at the Domestic WWTF, identifying those that exceed 60% of the MAHL and require the development of local limits.

Table 3-21 Domestic WWTF - Comparison of MAHLs with Average Headworks Loadings Pollutant
Maximum
Allowable
Headworks
(lbs/day)
Average Influent
Loading (lbs/day)
Average Percent
Loaded
New Local Limit
Required?

Arsenic 0.24 0.05 21% No
Cadmium 0.10 0.01 7% No
Chromium 0.83 0.08 9% No
Copper 0.96 0.89 92% Yes

Page 152 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
28 Table 3-21 Domestic WWTF - Comparison of MAHLs with Average Headworks Loadings Pollutant
Maximum
Allowable
Headworks
(lbs/day)
Average Influent
Loading (lbs/day)
Average Percent
Loaded
New Local Limit
Required?

Cyanide 0.25 0.04 18% No
Lead 0.10 0.03 35% No
Mercury 0.03 0.002 8% No
Nickel 1.34 0.08 6% No
Silver 0.00 0.04 0% No
Zinc 5.71 3.43 60% Yes
Molybdenum 0.41 0.04 10% No
Selenium 0.15 0.10 69% Yes
Ammonia 677.64 415.62 61% Yes

3.2.5. Background Loadings for Non-Industrial Sources
An essential component of the local limits development process is the quantification of background pollutant loadings from non -industrial sources. In accordance with the U.S. EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance, these background contributions , typically originating from residential, commercial, and other uncontrolled sources , must be accurately characterized and deducted from the treatment facility’s capacity to ensure that allowable loadings allocated to industrial users do not cause pass-through, interference, or violations of applicable discharge requirements.

At the City of Sanger, Domestic WWTF receives influent wastewater from a combination of residential, commercial, and four permitted industrial users: Initiative Foods, International Paper, and Pitman Family Hatchery, and GBI USA Co. In contrast, the Industrial WWTF exclusively receives flow from two SIU s and does not accept contributions from residential or commercial users. The Industrial WWTF does not receive hauled waste, and due to the facility’s separately design, the potential for inflow and infiltrat ion is minimal. As a result, there are no uncontrolled sources contributing to the Industrial WWTF, and the full MAHL for each pollutant is available for allocation to the permitted industrial users, subject to applicable safety factors and growth allowances as specified in EPA guidance. Uncontrolled background loadings are only applicable to the Domestic WWTF.

To estimate non-industrial contributions, the City conducted sampling at seven lift stations that primarily collect flow from residential and commercial areas. While GBI USA Co. discharges to the City’s Academy/Commerce lift station the other industrial users connect directly to the sewer lines feeding the Domestic WWTF, minimizing overlap. Sampling data from the five lift stations that do not receive any industrial discharges, provided in Appendix A, were used to characterize pollutant concentrations from non-industrial sources. The mass loadings from these sources were calculated using Equation 4 from EPA guidance.

Equation 4 – Residential and Background Loading Calculation 𝐿𝑈𝑁𝐶 = (𝐶𝑈𝑁𝐶) (𝑄𝑈𝑁𝐶)(8.34)

Page 153 ends

City of Sanger
Local Limits Study
Section 3 – Development of Local Discharge Limits
29 Where:

LUNC = Uncontrolled loading, lb/day
CUNC = Uncontrolled pollutant concentration, mg/L
QUNC = Uncontrolled flow rate, MGD

8.34 = Conversion factor
The uncontrolled flow rate (Q UNC) was determined by subtracting the total industrial flow (0.089 MGD) from the average daily influent flow to the Domestic WWTF (1. 80 MGD) for 2024 , resulting in a background flow of 1.71 MGD. Pollutant concentrations (CUNC) were derived from the lift station sampling data, and the calculated loadings (L UNC) are summarized in Table 3-22. This background loading analysis ensures that local limits developed for the Domestic WWTF accurately reflect the capacity available for industrial discharges, consistent with EPA methodology and the City’s treatment system design.

Table 3-22 Estimated Background Loadings from Non-Industrial Sources Pollutant
Uncontrolled
Flow
(MGD)(QUNC)
Uncontrolled
Pollutant
Concentration
(mg/L) (CUNC)
Nonindustrial
Loading (lbs/day)
(LUNC)

Arsenic 1.71 0.003 0.048
Cadmium 1.71 0.000 0.006
Chromium 1.71 0.004 0.061
Copper 1.71 0.059 0.844
Cyanide 1.71 0.003 0.041
Lead 1.71 0.002 0.034
Mercury 1.71 0.000 0.003
Nickel 1.71 0.005 0.077
Silver 1.71 0.003 0.036
Zinc 1.71 0.220 3.135
Molybdenum 1.71 0.002 0.035
Selenium 1.71 0.007 0.104
Ammonia 1.71 25.820 368

3.2.6. Maximum Allowable Industrial Loadings
The Maximum Allowable Industrial Loading (MAIL) represents the portion of a pollutant’s headworks loading capacity that may be allocated to industrial sources without exceeding the treatment facility’s operational or regulatory thresholds. For both the Dom estic and Industrial WWTFs, MAIL values are derived by subtracting background loadings from non -industrial sources and applying a safety factor to account for variability and uncertainty. MAIL values are calculated using Equation 5 from the U.S. EPA’s Local Limits Development Guidance.

Equation 5 – MAIL Calculation

Page 154 ends

Sanger City CouncilFebruary 19, 2026

Sanger City Council
February 19, 2026