Santa Ana City Council
May 17, 2022

UNSERVED
AREA
EJ

COMMUNITY
LUE
FOCUS
AREA

BELOW THE

POVERTY
LEVEL

MAJORITY
NONWHITE

HIGH PROJECTED

POPULATION

DENSITY
30 X X X
31 X X X
32 X
33 X
34 X
35 X X X X
36 X X X X
37 X X X X
38 X X X
39 X X X
40 X X X
41 X X X
42 X X
43 X
TOTALS 13 22 19 41 21
Unserved areas are residential areas that fall beyond a 10-minute walk (1/2-mile access) to City and Community Parks, and a 5-minute walk (1/4-mile access) to Neighborhood Parks and all other city parks, facilities, and resources.

Unserved residential gap areas with the highest severity of need, where three or more severity of need categories were check marked.

EQUITY ANALYSIS METRICS
EJ Community: Areas identified that are disproportionately burdened by multiple sources of pollution. Data provided by the City of Santa Ana using CalEnviroScreen 4.0, 2021.

LUE Focus Areas: Five focus areas identified by the General Plan Advisory Committee and refined by City staff along major corridors as most suitable for new development. Boundaries pulled from the 2045 General Plan, Land Use Element.

Below the Poverty Level: Census tracts with populations greater than 20% below the poverty threshold (The overall U.S. 5-year ACS poverty rate from 2015-2019 was 13.4%).

Majority Non-White: Census tracts with populations for which the racial majority (51% or more) is non-white or Hispanic/ Latino.

High Projected Population Density: Land uses that allow 15 dwelling units per acre or more are considered ‘high projected population density’ for the purposes of this analysis. Residential land use designations and densities were pulled from the 2045 General Plan, Land Use Element.

TABLE B-1: ANALYSIS OF SEVERITY OF NEED TABLE B-1: ANALYSIS OF SEVERITY OF NEED (CON’T)

UNSERVED
AREA
EJ

COMMUNITY
LUE
FOCUS
AREA

BELOW THE

POVERTY
LEVEL

MAJORITY
NONWHITE

HIGH PROJECTED

POPULATION

DENSITY
1 X X
2 X X
3 X X X X X
4 X X
5 X
6 X
7 X X
8 X X X
9 X X X X X
10 X X X
11/11a X
12/12a X
13 X
14 X X
15 X X
16 X X X X X
17 X X X X
18 X
19 X X X
20 X X
21 X X
22 X X
23 X X X X X
24 X X X X X
25 X X X X
26 X X X
27 X X X X X
28 X X X
29 X X X
246 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 247
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 137 5/17/2022

ID OPPORTUNITIES PARK NEED

SUMMARY OF

OPPORTUNITIES
KEY NEEDS 1 [RED TEXT]
ALTERNATIVE INTERVENTIONS 2
[BLACK TEXT]

UNSERVED
AREA

IMPROVE

EXISTING
PARK

IMPROVE

ACCESS TO

EXISTING
PARK
OTHER CITYOWNED

PROPERTY X

EXPLORE

JOINT-USE
SCHOOL

AGREEMENT

PRIVATE PARK,

SCHOOL,

FACILITY OR

RECREATION

OPPORTUNITY

EXISTING
TRAIL

CORRIDOR
(CLASS I)

PLANNED
TRAIL

CORRIDOR
(CLASS I/IV)

POTENTIAL

ACQUISITION

OPPORTUNITY

ACQUIRE AND

DEVELOP A NEW
PARK
1 Heritage Park Neighborhood Park
– Improve access to Heritage Park,
if possible [East/west connection
needed across East Garden Grove
Wintersburg Channel]
Acquire and develop Neighborhood Park to serve
residents north of 1st St (or entire unserved area, if
improved access cannot be achieved)
Address barriers to improve access to Heritage Park
[if possible], serving residents south of W 1st St
2 X
– Although there is a park need, the
unserved residential area is so small,
City should explore opportunities
besides park acquisition
Prioritize Class IV connection along W 17th St
3 Key Connection Citywide Park
[Willowick]
– Potential Acquisition Opportunity:

Willowick
– Key Connection would provide access
to Golden Loop
Acquire and provide access to Willowick Golf Course
(Citywide Park)
4 Partial
– JUA – Heritage Elementary School
[Partial]
– JUA – Fitz Intermediate School
(Garden Grove, 7th & 8th grades)
[Partial]
Explore opportunities for JUAs (2 options)
5 Full [Mile Square
Regional Park]
– Within a 10-minute (1/2 mile) walk to
Mile Square Regional Park Improve access to Mile Square Regional Park 6 Full – JUA – Newhope Elementary School Explore options for JUA with Newhope Elementary School
7 McFadden
Triangle Park Partial X
– Improve access to McFadden Triangle
Park, if possible [East/west connection
needed to Santa Ana River Trail at or
north of Flintstone Dr]
– JUA – Russell Elementary School
Address barriers to improve access to McFadden
Triangle Park [if possible] – along the Santa Ana River Trail
Explore opportunities for JUA (1 option)
8 Partial X Key Connection Pocket Park
– JUA – Abraham Lincoln Elementary
School
– Key Connection would provide access
to Golden Loop
Acquire and develop Pocket Park (along the trail
corridor, or west of S Fairview St)
Explore opportunities for JUA (1 option)
9 Partial X Key Connection Citywide Park
[Willowick]
– JUA – Romero-Cruz Academy
(Elementary School)/Spurgeon Park
– Potential Acquisition Opportunity:

Willowick [connection needed across
Santa Ana River]
– Key Connection would provide access
to Golden Loop
Acquire and provide access to Willowick Golf Course
(Citywide Park)
Explore opportunities for JUA (1 option)
TABLE B-2: ANALYSIS OF OPPORTUNITIES TO SERVE PARK GAPS 248 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 249
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 138 5/17/2022

ID OPPORTUNITIES PARK NEED

SUMMARY OF

OPPORTUNITIES
KEY NEEDS 1 [RED TEXT]
ALTERNATIVE INTERVENTIONS 2
[BLACK TEXT]

UNSERVED
AREA

IMPROVE

EXISTING
PARK

IMPROVE

ACCESS TO

EXISTING
PARK
OTHER CITYOWNED

PROPERTY X

EXPLORE

JOINT-USE
SCHOOL

AGREEMENT

PRIVATE PARK,

SCHOOL,

FACILITY OR

RECREATION

OPPORTUNITY

EXISTING
TRAIL

CORRIDOR
(CLASS I)

PLANNED
TRAIL

CORRIDOR
(CLASS I/IV)

POTENTIAL

ACQUISITION

OPPORTUNITY

ACQUIRE AND

DEVELOP A NEW
PARK
10 Edna Park X Citywide Park
[Willowick]
– Invest in improvements to Edna
Park (3.6 acres) to attract and serve
residents within a 10-minute (1/2 mile)
walk
– Potential Acquisition Opportunity:

Willowick
Acquire and provide access to Willowick Golf Course
(Citywide Park)
Invest in improvements to Edna Park (3.6 acres) to
attract and serve residents within a 10-minute (1/2
mile) walk
11 Edna Park
– Invest in improvements to Edna
Park (3.6 acres) to attract and serve
residents within a 10-minute (1/2 mile)
walk
Invest in improvements to Edna Park (3.6 acres) to
attract and serve residents within a 10-minute (1/2
mile) walk
11a
Memory Lane
Park X
– Improve access to Memory Lane Park,
if possible [East/west connection
needed to connect The City Dr S to
the Santa Ana River Trail]
Address barriers to improve access to Memory Lane
Park [if possible]
12 Jack Fisher Park Pocket Park
– Invest in improvements to Jack Fisher
Park (2.6 acres) to attract and serve
residents within a 10-minute (1/2 mile)
walk
Acquire and develop Pocket Park (along east side of
Santa Ana River Trail or along Golden Loop)
Invest in improvements to Jack Fisher Park (2.6 acres)
to attract and serve residents within a 10-minute (1/2
mile) walk
12a
Eldridge Park Morrison Park
– Invest in improvements to Eldridge
Park (1.2 acres) to attract and serve
residents within a 10-minute (1/2 mile)
walk
– Improve access to Morrison Park,
if possible [East/west connection
needed through Waterstone Park
Apartments (alley)]
Address barriers to improve access to Morrison Park
[if possible]
Invest in improvements to Eldridge Park (1.2 acres)
to attract and serve residents within a 10-minute (1/2
mile) walk
13 Jack Fisher Park Full
– Invest in improvements to Jack Fisher
Park (2.6 acres) to attract and serve
residents within a 10-minute (1/2 mile)
walk
– JUA – Santiago Elementary School
Explore options for JUA with Santiago Elementary
School
Invest in improvements to Jack Fisher Park (2.6 acres)
to attract and serve residents within a 10-minute (1/2
mile) walk
14 Jack Fisher Park Neighborhood Park
– Invest in improvements to Jack Fisher
Park (2.6 acres) to attract and serve
residents within a 10-minute (1/2 mile)
walk
Acquire and develop Neighborhood Park
Invest in improvements to Jack Fisher Park (2.6 acres)
to attract and serve residents within a 10-minute (1/2
mile) walk
15 Full – JUA – Wilson Elementary School [Full]
– JUA – Santa Ana College [Partial]
Explore options for JUA with Wilson Elementary
School
TABLE B-2: ANALYSIS OF OPPORTUNITIES TO SERVE PARK GAPS (CON’T) 250 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 251
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 139 5/17/2022
TABLE B-2: ANALYSIS OF OPPORTUNITIES TO SERVE PARK GAPS (CON’T)

ID OPPORTUNITIES PARK NEED

SUMMARY OF

OPPORTUNITIES
KEY NEEDS 1 [RED TEXT]
ALTERNATIVE INTERVENTIONS 2
[BLACK TEXT]

UNSERVED
AREA

IMPROVE

EXISTING
PARK

IMPROVE

ACCESS TO

EXISTING
PARK
OTHER CITYOWNED

PROPERTY X

EXPLORE

JOINT-USE
SCHOOL

AGREEMENT

PRIVATE PARK,

SCHOOL,

FACILITY OR

RECREATION

OPPORTUNITY

EXISTING
TRAIL

CORRIDOR
(CLASS I)

PLANNED
TRAIL

CORRIDOR
(CLASS I/IV)

POTENTIAL

ACQUISITION

OPPORTUNITY

ACQUIRE AND

DEVELOP A NEW
PARK
16 Angels
Community Park Partial Key Connection
– Invest in improvements to Angels
Community Park (1.6 acres) to attract
and serve residents within a 10-minute
(1/2 mile) walk
– JUA – Carver Elementary School
[Partial]
– Key Connection would provide access
to Golden Loop
Invest in improvements to Angels Community Park
(1.6 acres) to attract and serve residents within a
10-minute (1/2 mile) walk
Explore opportunities for JUA (1 option)
17 Partial Pocket Park – JUA – Davis Elementary School
Acquire and develop Pocket Park (north of W 17th St
to serve future high density residential area)
Explore opportunities for JUA (1 option)
18 Partial
Neighborhood Park
(shared between
areas 18 and 19)
– JUA – Advanced Learning Academy
(High School)
Explore options for JUA with Advanced Learning
Academy (High School)
19 Madbury Park Partial
Neighborhood Park
(shared between
areas 18 and 19)
– Invest in improvements to Madbury
Park (5.5 acres) to attract and serve
residents within a 10-minute (1/2 mile)
walk
– JUA – Sierra Preparatory Academy
(Elementary School)
Acquire and develop Neighborhood Park
Invest in improvements to Madbury Park (5.5 acres)
to attract and serve residents within a 10-minute (1/2
mile) walk
Explore opportunities for JUA (1 option)
20 Partial Fairhaven
Memorial Park
– Explore partnership with Fairhaven
Memorial Park (north of Fairhaven Ave)
– JUA – Fairhaven Elementary School
Explore partnership with Fairhaven Memorial Park
Explore opportunities for JUA (1 option)
21 Neighborhood Park – None identified Acquire and develop Neighborhood Park 22 X Key Connection
– Although there is a park need, the
unserved residential area is so small,
City should explore opportunities
besides park acquisition
– Key Connection would provide access
to Golden Loop
Prioritize Class IV connection along W 1st St
23 Saddleback View
Park Chepa’s Park Partial
– Invest in improvements to Saddleback
View Park (0.9 acres) to attract and
serve residents within a 10-minute (1/2
mile) walk
– Improve access to Chepa’s Park, if
possible [North/south pedestrian/
bicycle improvements across E Santa
Ana Blvd]
– JUA – Reach Academy (High School)
Invest in improvements to Saddleback View Park
(0.9 acres) to attract and serve residents within a
10-minute (1/2 mile) walk
Address barriers to improve access to Chepa’s Park
[if possible]
Explore opportunities for JUA (1 option)
252 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 253
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 140 5/17/2022

ID OPPORTUNITIES PARK NEED

SUMMARY OF

OPPORTUNITIES
KEY NEEDS 1 [RED TEXT]
ALTERNATIVE INTERVENTIONS 2
[BLACK TEXT]

UNSERVED
AREA

IMPROVE

EXISTING
PARK

IMPROVE

ACCESS TO

EXISTING
PARK
OTHER CITYOWNED

PROPERTY X

EXPLORE

JOINT-USE
SCHOOL

AGREEMENT

PRIVATE PARK,

SCHOOL,

FACILITY OR

RECREATION

OPPORTUNITY

EXISTING
TRAIL

CORRIDOR
(CLASS I)

PLANNED
TRAIL

CORRIDOR
(CLASS I/IV)

POTENTIAL

ACQUISITION

OPPORTUNITY

ACQUIRE AND

DEVELOP A NEW
PARK
24 Saddleback View
Park Partial Golden LoopKey Connection
– JUA – Reach Academy (High School)
[Partial]
– JUA – Raymond A Villa Fundamental
Intermediate School (6–8 grade)
[Partial]
– Develop Golden Loop – would provide
a direct connection to Chepa’s Park
and Roosevelt-Walker Elementary
School (existing Joint-Use School Site)
– Key Connection would provide access
to Golden Loop
Invest in improvements to Saddleback View Park
(0.9 acres) to attract and serve residents within a
10-minute (1/2 mile) walk
Explore opportunities for JUA (2 options)
25 Neighborhood Park – None identified Acquire and develop Neighborhood Park 26 Pacific Electric
Park
Partial [Standard
& McFadden] X
– Invest in improvements to Pacific
Electric Park/ Community Garden (1.4
acres) to attract and serve residents
within a 10-minute (1/2 mile) walk
– Develop/ program Standard &
McFadden Park (0.7 acres) as
Neighborhood Park to serve eastern
portion of this unserved area
Invest in improvements to Pacific Electric Park/
Community Garden (1.4 acres) to attract and serve
residents within a 10-minute (1/2 mile) walk
Develop undeveloped parkland into Neighborhood
Park
27 Pacific Electric
Park Partial X Golden Loop Pocket Park
– Invest in improvements to Pacific
Electric Park/ Community Garden (1.4
acres) to attract and serve residents
within a 10-minute (1/2 mile) walk
– JUA – Benjamin Franklin Elementary
School
– Develop Golden Loop – would
provide a direct connection to Pacific
Electric Park (Neighborhood Park) and
Roosevelt-Walker Elementary School
(Joint-Use School Site)
Acquire and develop Pocket Park (along Golden
Loop corridor or Main Street to serve future high
density residential area)
Invest in improvements to Pacific Electric Park/
Community Garden (1.4 acres) to attract and serve
residents within a 10-minute (1/2 mile) walk
Explore opportunities for JUA (1 option)
28 Angels
Community Park Partial Boys & Girls Club of Santa Ana
– Invest in improvements to Angels
Community Park (1.6 acres) to attract
and serve residents within a 10-minute
(1/2 mile) walk
– Explore partnership with Boys and
Girls Club of Santa Ana
– JUA – Lowell Elementary School
[Partial]
– JUA – Pio Pico Elementary School
[Partial]
– JUA – Benjamin Franklin Elementary
School [Partial]
– JUA – Santa Ana High School [Partial]
Invest in improvements to Angels Community Park
(1.6 acres) to attract and serve residents within a
10-minute (1/2 mile) walk
Explore opportunities for JUA (4 options)
TABLE B-2: ANALYSIS OF OPPORTUNITIES TO SERVE PARK GAPS (CON’T) 254 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 255
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 141 5/17/2022

ID OPPORTUNITIES PARK NEED

SUMMARY OF

OPPORTUNITIES
KEY NEEDS 1 [RED TEXT]
ALTERNATIVE INTERVENTIONS 2
[BLACK TEXT]

UNSERVED
AREA

IMPROVE

EXISTING
PARK

IMPROVE

ACCESS TO

EXISTING
PARK
OTHER CITYOWNED

PROPERTY X

EXPLORE

JOINT-USE
SCHOOL

AGREEMENT

PRIVATE PARK,

SCHOOL,

FACILITY OR

RECREATION

OPPORTUNITY

EXISTING
TRAIL

CORRIDOR
(CLASS I)

PLANNED
TRAIL

CORRIDOR
(CLASS I/IV)

POTENTIAL

ACQUISITION

OPPORTUNITY

ACQUIRE AND

DEVELOP A NEW
PARK
29 Angels
Community Park Key Connection
Linear Pocket
Park [Bristol St
and Walnut St]
– Invest in improvements to Angels
Community Park (1.6 acres) to attract
and serve residents within a 10-minute
(1/2 mile) walk
– Potential Acquisition Opportunity:

Bristol St 1 (Walnut St)
– Key Connection would provide access
to Golden Loop
Acquire and provide access to Bristol Street 1
(Pocket Park/ Linear Park)
Invest in improvements to Angels Community Park
(1.6 acres) to attract and serve residents within a
10-minute (1/2 mile) walk
30 Full [Myrtle &
Raitt]
– Develop/ program Myrtle & Raitt
Park (1.1 acres) as Neighborhood
Park, providing full access to rec
opportunities to residents within this
unserved area
Develop undeveloped parkland into Neighborhood
Park
31 Full Boys & Girls Club
of Santa Ana Key Connection
– Explore partnership with Boys and
Girls Club of Santa Ana
– JUA – Martin Luther King Jr
Elementary School
– Key Connection would provide access
to Golden Loop
Explore options for JUA with Martin Luther King Jr
Elementary School
32 Neighborhood Park
(shared between
areas 32 and 33)
– None identified Acquire and develop Neighborhood Park 33 Partial Key Connection
Neighborhood Park
(shared between
areas 32 and 33)
– JUA – Mater Dei High School [Partial]
– Key Connection would provide access
to Golden Loop
Explore opportunities for JUA (1 option)
34 Full
Linear Pocket
Park [Bristol St,
Wilshire Ave to
McFadden Ave]
– JUA – Martin Elementary School
– Potential Acquisition Opportunity:

Bristol St 2 (Wilshire Ave to McFadden
Ave)
Explore options for JUA with Martin Elementary
School
Acquire and provide access to Bristol Street 2
(Pocket Park/ Linear Park)
35 Pacific Electric
Park Partial X
– Invest in improvements to Pacific
Electric Park/ Community Garden (1.4
acres) to attract and serve residents
within a 10-minute (1/2 mile) walk
– JUA – Lathrop Intermediate School
(Middle School) [Partial]
Invest in improvements to Pacific Electric Park/
Community Garden (1.4 acres) to attract and serve
residents within a 10-minute (1/2 mile) walk
Explore opportunities for JUA (1 option)
36 Partial X Neighborhood Park – JUA – Edison Elementary School [Partial]
Acquire and develop Neighborhood Park (along
or west of Main St to serve future high density
residential area – could also serve area 34 depending
on location)
Explore opportunities for JUA (1 option)
TABLE B-2: ANALYSIS OF OPPORTUNITIES TO SERVE PARK GAPS (CON’T) 256 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 257
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 142 5/17/2022

ID OPPORTUNITIES PARK NEED

SUMMARY OF

OPPORTUNITIES
KEY NEEDS 1 [RED TEXT]
ALTERNATIVE INTERVENTIONS 2
[BLACK TEXT]

UNSERVED
AREA

IMPROVE

EXISTING
PARK

IMPROVE

ACCESS TO

EXISTING
PARK
OTHER CITYOWNED

PROPERTY X

EXPLORE

JOINT-USE
SCHOOL

AGREEMENT

PRIVATE PARK,

SCHOOL,

FACILITY OR

RECREATION

OPPORTUNITY

EXISTING
TRAIL

CORRIDOR
(CLASS I)

PLANNED
TRAIL

CORRIDOR
(CLASS I/IV)

POTENTIAL

ACQUISITION

OPPORTUNITY

ACQUIRE AND

DEVELOP A NEW
PARK
37 Key Connection Neighborhood Park – Key Connection would provide access to Golden Loop Acquire and develop Neighborhood Park
38 Pocket Park
– None identified
– Extend proposed Class IV trail corridor
east of Main St to provide access to
surrounding Community Parks (Lillie
King/ Sandpoint/ Bomo Koral)
Acquire and develop Pocket Park
39 Segerstrom
Triangle Park Partial
– Invest in improvements to Segerstrom
Triangle Park (1.3 acres) to attract and
serve residents within a 10-minute (1/2
mile) walk
– JUA – Thomas Jefferson Elementary
School
Invest in improvements to Segerstrom Triangle Park
(1.3 acres) to attract and serve residents within a
10-minute (1/2 mile) walk
Explore opportunities for JUA (1 option)
40 Segerstrom
Triangle Park Partial X Golden Loop
– Invest in improvements to Segerstrom
Triangle Park (1.3 acres) to attract and
serve residents within a 10-minute (1/2
mile) walk
– JUA – Saddleback High School
– Develop Golden Loop – would
provide a direct connection to Key
Connection/ Carl Thornton Park
(Community Park)
Invest in improvements to Segerstrom Triangle Park
(1.3 acres) to attract and serve residents within a
10-minute (1/2 mile) walk
Explore opportunities for JUA (1 option)
41 Bomo Koral Park X Pocket Park
– Improve access to Bomo Koral Park, if
possible [East/west connection needed
at southwest corner of park through
Southcoast Terrace Condominiums]
Acquire and develop Pocket Park (along trail corridor,
or east of Bear St and west of Bristol St to serve
future high density residential area)
Address barriers to improve access to Bomo Koral
Park [if possible] to serve area east of Bristol St
42 Full [Griset Park] X
– Develop/ program Griset Park (6.5
acres) as Community Park, providing
full access to rec opportunities to
residents within this unserved area
Develop and provide access to Griset Park
(Community Park)
43 X Neighborhood Park Acquire and develop Neighborhood Park TOTALS 17 7 3 23 Areas
Potentially
Served
3 Areas
Potentially
Served
13 13 5 Areas
Potentially
Served
9 Neighborhood
Parks
6 Pocket Parks
TABLE B-2: ANALYSIS OF OPPORTUNITIES TO SERVE PARK GAPS (CON’T) 1 Key Need: Summarizes the most cost-effective and likely interventions to serve a gap area, recognizing that acquiring parkland is not feasible in all areas. In some areas, both trail development and another intervention are warranted. Some acquisition opportunities for larger parks may serve more than one gap area. 2 Alternative Intervention: Opportunities to consider if the Key Need(s) identified is not feasible.

Unserved areas are residential areas that fall beyond a 10-minute walk (1/2-mile access) to City and Community Parks, and a 5-minute walk (1/4-mile access) to Neighborhood Parks and all other city parks, facilities, and resources.

Unserved residential gap areas with the highest severity of need, where three or more severity of need categories were check marked.
258 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 259
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 143 5/17/2022

OPPORTUNITY
KEY NEEDS 1 AND

ALTERNATIVE
INTERVENTIONS 2
AREA(S) SERVED 3
Improve
Existing Park
17 areas would benefit
from investments and
enhancements to
Neighborhood Parks to
attract and serve residents
within a 10-minute (1/2
mile) walk
10, 11 – Edna Park
12, 13, 14 – Jack Fisher Park
12a – Eldridge Park
16, 28, 29 – Angels Community Park
19 – Mabury Park
23, 24 – Saddleback View Park
26, 27, 35 – Pacific Electric Park
39, 40 – Segerstrom Park
Improve Access
to Existing Park
City Parks
6 areas would benefit
from addressing barriers
to existing parks
providing greater access
1 – Heritage Park
East/west connection needed across East
Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel
7 – McFadden Triangle Park
East/west connection needed to Santa Ana
River Trail at or north of Flintstone Dr
11a – Memory Lane Park
East/west connection needed to connect
The City Dr S to the Santa Ana River Trail
23 – Chepa’s Park
North/south pedestrian/bicycle
improvements across E Santa Ana Blvd
Partnerships with HOAs required:
12a – Morrison Park
East/west connection needed through
Waterstone Park Apartments (alley)
41 – Bomo Koral
East/west connection needed at southwest
corner of park through Southcoast Terrace
Condominiums
Regional Park
1 area would benefit
from addressing barriers
to existing regional park
providing greater access
5 – Mile Square Regional Park
Other CityOwned Property
Develop undeveloped
parkland
2 neighborhood parks
26 – Standard & McFadden
30 – Myrtle & Raitt
Reclaim park resource
1 community park 42 – Griset Park
TABLE B-3: DETAILED SUMMARY OF KEY NEEDS AND ALTERNATIVE INTERVENTIONS

OPPORTUNITY
KEY NEEDS 1 AND

ALTERNATIVE
INTERVENTIONS 2
AREA(S) SERVED 3
Explore a jointuse school
agreement 4
– 18 JUAs with
elementary schools
– 8 JUAs with
intermediate/high
schools
23 areas served
See Tables B-4 and B-5 for additional detail
Private Park,
School, Facility
or Recreation
Opportunity
2 partnerships
Serving areas 28 and 31 – Boys & Girls Club of
Santa Ana
20 – Fairhaven Memorial Park
Existing or
Planned Trail
Corridor
10 areas focusing on key
connections that improve
recreation opportunities
and access to existing
parks
3, 8, 9, 16, 22, 24, 29, 31, 33, 37
3 areas with improved
access to park system
with access to the Golden
Loop
24, 27, 40
Potential
Acquisition
Opportunity
1 citywide park [Willowick] Serving areas 3, 9, and 10
2 linear pocket parks
[Bristol St properties] 29, 34
Acquire and
develop a new
park
9 neighborhood parks
[new acquisitions needed] 1, 14, 19, 21, 25, 32, 36, 37, 43 6 pocket parks [new
acquisitions needed] 8, 12, 17, 27, 38, 41
TABLE B-3: DETAILED SUMMARY OF KEY NEEDS AND ALTERNATIVE INTERVENTIONS (CON’T) 1 Key Need: Summarizes the most cost-effective and likely interventions to serve a gap area, recognizing that acquiring parkland is not feasible in all areas. In some areas, both trail development and another intervention are warranted. Some acquisition opportunities for larger parks may serve more than one gap area.
2 Alternative Intervention: Opportunities to consider if the Key Need(s) identified is not feasible. 3 Areas served listed as bold/red indicate a high need unserved area. 4 The presence of schools within a park gap area presents an opportunity for a partnership or joint-use agreement to ensure public access to recreation space. However, it does not guarantee that the SAUSD is open to this type of arrangement, nor does it add greenspace in these deficient areas. See Chapter 6 and 7 for additional information and recommendations. Unserved areas with more than one school listed as a Key Need or Alternative Intervention in Appendix B is meant to provide a choice. More than one JUA per unserved area is not necessarily recommended.
5 Potential Citywide Park acquisition is Willowick Golf Course. Potential Linear Pocket Park acquisitions include two properties along Bristol St. Neighborhood and Pocket Parks noted in this table indicate a need, without any opportunities or potential sites identified. 260 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 261
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 144 5/17/2022
TABLE B-4: AREAS SERVED WITH JOINT-USE SCHOOL AGREEMENT OPPORTUNITIES Table B-4: Areas Served with Joint-Use School Agreement Opportunities School Name School Type 4 6 7 8 9 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 23 24 27 28 31 33 34 35 36 39 40 Total Abraham Lincoln Elementary School Elementary Partial 1
Benjamin Franklin Elementary School Elementary Partial Partial 3 Carver Elementary School Elementary Partial 1
Davis Elementary School Elementary Partial 1
Edison Elementary School Elementary Partial 1
Fairhaven Elementary School Elementary Partial 1
Heritage Elementary School Elementary Partial 1
Lowell Elementary School Elementary Partial 1
Martin Elementary School Elementary Full 1
Martin Luther King Jr Elementary School Elementary Full 1 Newhope Elementary School Elementary Full 1
Pio Pico Elementary School Elementary Partial 1
Romero-Cruz Academy Elementary Partial 1
Russell Elementary School Elementary Partial 1
Santiago Elementary School Elementary Full 1
Sierra Preparatory Academy Elementary Partial 1
Thomas Jefferson Elementary School Elementary Partial 1 Wilson Elementary School Elementary Full 1
Advanced Learning Academy Intermediate/ High Partial 1
Fitz Intermediate School Intermediate/ High Partial 1
Lathrop Intermediate School Intermediate/ High Partial 1 Mater Dei High School Intermediate/ High Partial 1
School Intermediate/ High Partial 1
Reach Academy Intermediate/ High Partial Partial 2
Saddleback High School Intermediate/ High Partial 1
Santa Ana High School Intermediate/ High Partial 1
Notes:
-Areas served listed as bold/red indicate a high needs unserved area. -The presence of schools within a park gap area presents an opportunity for a partnership or joint use agreement to ensure public access to recreation space. However, it does not guarantee that the SAUSD is open to this type of arrangement, nor does it add greenspace in these deficient areas. See Chapter 6 and 7 for additional information and recommendations. Unserved areas with more than one school listed as a Key Need or Alternative Intervention in Appendix B is meant to provide a choice. More than one JUA per unserved area is not necessarily recommended.

Areas Served
262 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 263
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 145 5/17/2022
TABLE B-5: SUMMARY OF JOINT-USE SCHOOL AGREEMENT PRIORITIES (CON’T)

SCHOOL NAME AREA(S)
SERVED 3

LEVEL OF ACCESS

TO RECREATION

OPPORTUNITIES
PROVIDED 4 5
AREAS WITH JUA IDENTIFIED AS KEY NEED 1
Heritage Elementary School and/or
Fitz Intermediate School 4 Partial
Newhope Elementary School 6 Full
Russell Elementary School 7 Partial
Santiago Elementary School 13 Full
Wilson Elementary School 15 Full
Carver Elementary School 16 Partial
Benjamin Franklin Elementary School and/or
Lowell Elementary School and/or
Pio Pico Elementary School and/or
Santa Ana High School
28 Partial
Martin Luther King Jr Elementary School 31 Full
Martin Elementary School 34 Full
Saddleback High School 40 Partial
TOTALS 10 Areas
Served
5 Full Access
5 Partial Access
TABLE B-5: SUMMARY OF JOINT-USE SCHOOL AGREEMENT PRIORITIES

SCHOOL NAME AREA(S)
SERVED 3

LEVEL OF ACCESS

TO RECREATION

OPPORTUNITIES

PROVIDED
AREAS WITH JUA IDENTIFIED AS ALTERNATIVE INTERVENTION 2 Abraham Lincoln Elementary School 8 Partial
Romero-Cruz Academy 9 Partial
Davis Elementary School 17 Partial
Advanced Learning Academy 18 Partial
Sierra Preparatory Academy 19 Partial
Fairhaven Elementary School 20 Partial
Reach Academy 23 Partial
Reach Academy and/or
Raymond A Villa Fundamental Intermediate
School
24 Partial
Benjamin Franklin Elementary School 27 Partial
Mater Dei High School 33 Partial
Lathrop Intermediate School 35 Partial
Edison Elementary School 36 Partial
Thomas Jefferson Elementary School 39 Partial
TOTALS 13 Areas Served 13 Partial Access
1 Key Need: Summarizes the most cost-effective and likely interventions to serve a gap area, recognizing that acquiring parkland is not feasible in all areas. In some areas, both trail development and another intervention are warranted. Some acquisition opportunities for larger parks may serve more than one gap area. 2 Alternative Intervention: Opportunities to consider if the Key Need(s) identified is not feasible. 3 Areas served listed as bold/red indicate a high need unserved area. 4 Full Access: All residents within the identified unserved residential area would gain public access to recreation space with a joint-use school agreement.
5 Partial Access: Only a portion of the unserved residential area would benefit from a joint-use school agreement. 264 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 265
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 146 5/17/2022
APPENDIX C: SITE

RECOMMENDATIONS
This appendix presents a matrix that
categorizes recommendations for all
existing and proposed parks.

The City of Santa Ana is looking to
enhance its park system, which requires
acquiring, developing, improving,
enhancing, restoring, maintaining and
reinvesting in parks and facilities.
266 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 267
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 147 5/17/2022
This appendix presents two tables to summarize park system recommendations. • Table C-2: Recommendations for Existing and Proposed Parks • Table C-3: Additional Recommendations for Trail Corridors and Joint-Use School Parks Table C-1: Recommendations for Existing
and Proposed Parks presents a matrix noting
recommended capital projects for existing parks
and potential future park sites. Table rows are
divided into two main sections: 1) Existing Parks;
and 2) Planned, Proposed and Expanded Parks.

Within these two categories, parks are divided
into park types as inventoried.

The matrix uses a checklist approach to identify
sites where specific site interventions are
needed. This allows the City to quickly assess
which sites are in need of renovation, and how
many sites may be targeted for acquisition and
new park development. The City may consider
other projects not noted in this matrix, as long
as they fit with the vision, values, key initiatives
and policies of the Parks Master Plan. The intent
of this matrix to provide general guidance on
systemwide enhancements needed. It informs
the costs shown in Appendix E. The matrix
includes the following information:

SITE INFORMATION
• Site: The name of the park or a reference
name. Where the new park is intended to
meet needs noted in the park access and
equity analysis, the corresponding number of
the park gap is noted. (See Chapter 4.)
• Total Acreage: Total acreage of and existing
site or the proposed acreage for a new site.
• % of Acreage Developed: The area of the
site that is currently developed or will be
developed upon completion of recommended
improvements. This percentage is an estimate
that help account for the natural resources
present on site.

MATRIX INTRODUCTION

PARK RECOMMENDATIONS

SITE INTERVENTION OR

OPPORTUNITY
As noted in the Chapter 4 and Appendix B,
several existing sites could benefit from the
following interventions and opportunities to
improve park access within several park gaps
areas (areas unserved by existing parks).
• Potential Expansion: Adjacent properties to
park may have the potential for City acquisition
for park expansion. As a capacity enhancement
project, these expansions are noted under
Planned, Proposed and Expanded Parks and
simply cross-referenced here.
• Enhancement to Attract Residents From
Farther Away: Currently, some of Santa
Ana’s parks attract visitors from ¼ mile away,
as noted in the City’s park service standards.

The development of more and more unique
recreation facilities at sites noted in this column
could help serve nearby unserved areas.
• Improved Access to Existing Park: The
service area reach of some park sites is limited
because of a nearby barrier that impedes
walking to the park within a 5- or 10-minute
walk. (¼ or ½ mile) These sites would benefit
from access improvements.

CAPITAL PROJECTS
• Acquire/Expand: Where appropriate, obtain
new land for future park development.
• Master Plan or Design: Where appropriate,
create site master plans, design concepts and/
or feasibility studies. This applies to proposed
new parks and to existing sites slated for
significant enhancements. Before any major
facility is renovated, expanded or developed,
the City should create a financial feasibility
analysis and market study to ensure that the
building is successfully operational when open.
• Develop Park: Construct the site to include any
infrastructure, utilities, landscaping, recreation
facilities and support amenities at the site.
• Develop Through Partnership: Contribute to
the cost of a new park or facility developed
through public/private partnership or public/
public partnership.
• New Major Facility Additions: This column
includes notes about the addition of any new
major facilities at the site.
• Improve Comfort Amenities: Make
improvements to comfort amenities such
as lighting, seating, shade shelters, trash
receptacles, bike racks, etc. that are
damaged, worn or at end of their lifecycles.

These represent minor improvements that
affect approximately three percent of the
developed portion of the site.
268 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 269
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 148 5/17/2022
• Minor Enhancement: Provide small to medium
level of improvements or upgrades to an
existing park. Minor renovations may apply to
improvements for approximately 15 percent
of the site or to a few athletic/sport facilities,
outdoor recreation facilities, trail/path, natural
area, or park amenities at an existing park, with
each individual facility renovation anticipated to
cost less than $0.5 million.
• Major Enhancement: Provide extensive level
of improvements/upgrades to an existing park.

Major renovations may include new, large-scale,
signature park elements such as play areas, sports
fields, extensive trails, considerable accessibility
improvements, new picnic shelters, new restrooms,
etc. Major renovations are anticipated to affect
approximately 30% of the developed portion of
the site or add costly features and facilities to the
site. These may include multiple improvements
projected at or above $1 million.
• Major Facility Renovation: These notes are
based on projects currently in the City’s CIP
that explain where sites may require major
renovations.
• Turf Conversion: At parks where planted turf
occurs throughout most of the park, convert up
to five percent of the site to native plantings or
natural areas requiring less maintenance and
water.
• Landscape/Plantings: Repair and restore existing
landscape and planting areas that have died off or
declined.

ONGOING MAINTENANCE AND

MANAGEMENT
All park sites require some type of routine and
preventative maintenance to take care of City assets
and landscaping. However, parks with higher levels
of use, specialized facilities, reservable facilities and organized programs/events typically required a
greater level of maintenance. Sites with substantial
natural resources may need specialized care for natural resources in addition to the routine maintenance for
developed park areas. This section notes the level of
maintenance that developed park areas should receive
(standard or enhanced). It also indicates where sites
have extensive undeveloped or natural areas that
require a different type and frequency of maintenance
(natural resource stewardship). The table below notes
these maintenance levels.
• Standard: Provide a basic level of maintenance
at parks with regular use. Provide routine and
preventative maintenance, plus routine hazard
monitoring and basic landscaping care and
beautification.
• Enhanced: Provide enhanced maintenance at sites
that include specialized assets, are programmed or
are heavily used. Ensure these sites receive priority
during peak use times, as well as special attention
to support programming and events.
• Natural Resource Stewardship: Steward natural
resources that require less frequent and, on
occasions, specialized care. Environmental
restoration may be needed.
• Asset Management and Replacement: Set aside
funds annually to offset the costs of replacing
facilities at the end of their lifecycles. This is a
small allowance to ensure the City has some funds
on hand to repair and replace aging, worn, or
damaged park features.

LEVEL ROUTINE TASKS OCCASIONAL

TASKS APPLICATION

ROUTINE AND PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE FOR DEVELOPED PARKS Standard
– Basic landscape maintenance for
safety and aesthetics
– Monitoring and inspection
– Litter pickup
– Routine and preventative care for
site furnishings and facilities
– Restroom cleaning
– Graffiti and
vandalism
removal or repair
– Amenity and
facility repair
Parks with
regular use (e.g.,
neighborhood
parks). Specialized
care is not needed.

Enhanced
– All tasks in “standard” level, but
on a more frequent basis
– Specialized facility maintenance
(e.g., splashpad)
– Sports field turf irrigation and
management
– Janitorial care of buildings (e.g.,
community center)
– Care of floral and botanical
plantings, weeding, pruning
where applicable
– Repair of major
facilities
– Program/event/
reservable facility
preparation,
setup, or cleanup
Parks with
specialized assets,
buildings and
heavier or more
frequent use,
including events
and programs.

ADDITIONAL MAINTENANCE
Natural
Resource
Stewardship
– Routine monitoring and
inspection
– Tree / brush pruning
– Mowing (where appropriate)
– Trail clearing
– Tree canopy
protection
– Invasive species
removal
– Dumping and
hazards removal
– Lake or
streambank
stabilization
– Natural area
restoration
– Natural resource
management
– Fire prevention
Parks with
significant natural
resources,
substantial natural
areas, or located
adjacent to river
corridors.

TABLE C-1: SUMMARY OF MAINTENANCE LEVELS
270 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 271
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 149 5/17/2022
TABLE C-2: ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRCSA TRAILS AND JOINT-USE SCHOOL PARKS Sites Acreage Miles
Trail Corridors
Existing Trail Corridors 23.3 12.8
Proposed Golden Loop Trail 8.2 4.5
Proposed Key Connection Trails 37.5 20.6
Trail Corridors Subtotal 68.9 37.9
Joint-Use Schools
Existing Joint-Use Schools 13.3
Proposed Joint-Use Schools 42.0
Joint-Use Schools Subtotal 55.3 0.0
TOTAL 124.2 37.9
Notes:

Acreage for Key Connection Trails and the Golden Loop Trail is calculated based on an average corridor width of 15 feet.

Acreage for Joint-Use Schools are based on counts of 18 elementary sites x 1 acre, plus 8 intermediate or high school sites x 3 acres. These estimates are influenced by the size of existing joint-use sites.

Table C-2: Additional Recommendations for PRCSA Trails and Joint-Use School Parks While not counted as City parkland, off-street trail corridors and joint-use school parks are anticipated to play an important role in the future park system. As noted in Chapters 4 and 5, trails are proposed to enhance connectivity and access to parks. Increasing the number of joint-use school parks is proposed as a cost-effective way to ensure recreation opportunities are available in park gaps areas where schools are well situated to meet local needs:
• Table C-2: Presents the recommended or current mileage and/or acreage associated with these existing and proposed assets.
• Table C-3: Recommendations for PRCSA Trails and Joint-Use School Parks

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TRAILS

AND JOINT-USE SITES
272 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 273
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 150 5/17/2022
TABLE C-2: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED PARKS Park and Facility Inventory | A-1
Table C-1: Recommendations for Existing and Proposed
Reinvest
Sites
Total
Acreage
% of Acreage DevelopedPotential Expansion (See Planned, Proposed and Expanded Parks)Enhancement to Attract Residents From Farther AwayImproved Access to Existing ParkAcquire/ExpandMaster Plan or DesignDevelop ParkDevelop through PartnershipNew Major Facility Additions (Write-In)Improve Comfort Amenities Minor Park Renovation or ImprovementsMajor Park Renovation or ImprovementsMajor Facility RenovationTurf ConversionLandscaping/PlantingsStandard MaintenanceEnhanced MaintenanceNature Resource Stewardship Annual Asset
Management &
Replacement
Allowance

EXISTING PARKS
Community Parks
City Parks
Centennial Park 65.3 60% x x
Dan Young Soccer
Complex turf
conversions and
upgrades, Centennial
Lake renovation, new
dog park x x x x x
Santiago Park 34.6 90% x x x
Nature Center
renovations x x x x
Carl Thornton Park 32.7 85% x
New splash pad,
George Upton All
Access Park x x x x x
Jerome Park 19.3 100% x x
Renovations to
Jerome Center,
Corbin Center and
Southwest Senior
Center x x
Memorial Park 16.3 100% x x
New recreation
center** x
Memorial Pool
renovation, new
splash pad x x x
City Parks Subtotal 168.2
Community Parks
Windsor Park 10.8 100% x x x x x
Bomo Koral Park 10.4 100% x x x x x x
Lillie King Park 10.4 100% x x x x x
Delhi Park 9.9 100% x x x x x
Portola Park 9.1 100% x x x x
El Salvador Park 8.9 100% x x x
Renovate Salgado
Center, new splash
pad, exercise area x x x
Rosita Park 8.7 100% x x x x
Riverview Park 8.3 100% x x x
Sandpointe Park 7.7 100% x x x
Cabrillo Park 7.6 100% x x x x x
Site Intervention or
Site Info Opportunity

RECOMMENDATIONS
Acquire/Develop Improve/Enhance Maintain
Repair /
Restore
274 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 275
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 151 5/17/2022
Park and Facility Inventory | A-2
Table C-1: Recommendations for Existing and Proposed
Reinvest
Sites
Total
Acreage
% of Acreage DevelopedPotential Expansion (See Planned, Proposed and Expanded Parks)Enhancement to Attract Residents From Farther AwayImproved Access to Existing ParkAcquire/ExpandMaster Plan or DesignDevelop ParkDevelop through PartnershipNew Major Facility Additions (Write-In)Improve Comfort Amenities Minor Park Renovation or ImprovementsMajor Park Renovation or ImprovementsMajor Facility RenovationTurf ConversionLandscaping/PlantingsStandard MaintenanceEnhanced MaintenanceNature Resource Stewardship Annual Asset
Management &
Replacement
Allowance
Site Intervention or
Site Info Opportunity

RECOMMENDATIONS
Acquire/Develop Improve/Enhance Maintain
Repair /
Restore
Cesar Chavez Campesino Park 6.5 100% x x New splash pad x x x x Heritage Park 6.4 100% x x x x x
Madison Park 6.0 100% x New splash pad x x x
Adams Park 5.7 100% x x x x x
Morrison Park 5.1 100% x x x x
Santa Anita Park 5.1 100% x x x x x x
Birch Park 2.4 100% x
Renovate Santa Ana
Senior Center x x
Community Parks Subtotal 129.0
Community-Serving Parks Subtotal 297.2
Neighborhood Parks
Mabury Park 5.5 100% x x x x x
Edna Park 3.6 100% x x x x
Jack Fisher Park 2.6 100% x x x x x
Angels Community Park 1.6 100% x x x x
Pacific Electric Park 1.4 100% x x x x
Saddleback View Park 0.9 100% x x x x x
Memory Lane Park 0.6 100% x x
Chepa's Park 0.4 100% x x x x x
Mariposa Park 0.4 100% x x
Colonel William W. Eldridge Park 1.2 100% x x x x
Segerstrom Triangle Park 1.3 100% x x x x
Neighborhood Parks Subtotal 19.5
TABLE C-2: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED PARKS (CON’T) 276 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 277
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 152 5/17/2022
Park and Facility Inventory | A-2
Table C-1: Recommendations for Existing and Proposed
Reinvest
Sites
Total
Acreage
% of Acreage DevelopedPotential Expansion (See Planned, Proposed and Expanded Parks)Enhancement to Attract Residents From Farther AwayImproved Access to Existing ParkAcquire/ExpandMaster Plan or DesignDevelop ParkDevelop through PartnershipNew Major Facility Additions (Write-In)Improve Comfort Amenities Minor Park Renovation or ImprovementsMajor Park Renovation or ImprovementsMajor Facility RenovationTurf ConversionLandscaping/PlantingsStandard MaintenanceEnhanced MaintenanceNature Resource Stewardship Annual Asset
Management &
Replacement
Allowance
Site Intervention or
Site Info Opportunity

RECOMMENDATIONS
Acquire/Develop Improve/Enhance Maintain
Repair /
Restore
Other Parks and Facilities
Pocket Parks
Sarah May Downie Herb Garden 0.1 100% x x
French Park 0.2 100% x x
17th Street Triangle Park 0.7 100% x x x x x
Fairview Triangle Habitat Restoration 0.7 100% x x x
McFadden Triangle Park 0.8 100% x x x x
Maple and Occidental Exercise Park 1.0 100% x x x
Friendship Park 0.1 100% x x x x
Garfield Fitness Park 0.1 100% x x x
Pocket Parks Subtotal 3.7
Urban Plazas
Plaza Calle Cuatro 0.2 100% x x
Sasscer Park 0.9 100% x x x
Civic Center 4.9 100% x x
Urban Plazas Subtotal 6.0
Special Use Facilities
Santa Ana Zoo at Prentice Park 18.8 100% x
Education Center
renovation, new
splash pad x x
Santa Ana Stadium 7.0 100% x x x
Cabrillo Tennis Center 3.6 100% x x
Neal Machander Tennis Center 3.3 100% x x
Special Use Facilities Subtotal 32.7
Other Parks and Facilities Subtotal 42.4
TOTAL EXISTING PARKS 359.1
City Parks
Willowick Site 101.0 75% x x x x x x
Centennial Park Expansion 3.5 100% x x x x
Santiago Park Expansion 2.4 100% x x x x
City Parks Subtotal 106.9

PLANNED, PROPOSED AND EXPANDED PARKS
TABLE C-2: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED PARKS (CON’T) 278 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 279
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 153 5/17/2022
Park and Facility Inventory | A-2
Table C-1: Recommendations for Existing and Proposed
Reinvest
Sites
Total
Acreage
% of Acreage DevelopedPotential Expansion (See Planned, Proposed and Expanded Parks)Enhancement to Attract Residents From Farther AwayImproved Access to Existing ParkAcquire/ExpandMaster Plan or DesignDevelop ParkDevelop through PartnershipNew Major Facility Additions (Write-In)Improve Comfort Amenities Minor Park Renovation or ImprovementsMajor Park Renovation or ImprovementsMajor Facility RenovationTurf ConversionLandscaping/PlantingsStandard MaintenanceEnhanced MaintenanceNature Resource Stewardship Annual Asset
Management &
Replacement
Allowance
Site Intervention or
Site Info Opportunity

RECOMMENDATIONS
Acquire/Develop Improve/Enhance Maintain
Repair /
Restore
Community Parks
Griset Park (conversion for park use) 6.5 100% x x x
Warner Ave Site 16.0 100% x x x x x
El Salvador Park Expansion 1.6 100% x x x x x
Santa Anita Park Expansion 7.2 100% x x x x x
Cesar Chavez Campesino Park Expansion 2.5 100% x x x x x Delhi Park Expansion 3.3 100% x x x x x
Community Parks Subtotal 37.1
Neighborhood Parks
Myrtle and Raitt Park 1.1 100% x x x x
New Neighborhood Park A (Gap Area 1) 2.0 100% x x x x x New Neighborhood Park B (Gap Area 14) 2.0 100% x x x x x New Neighborhood Park C (Gap Area 19) 2.0 100% x x x x x New Neighborhood Park D (Gap Area 21) 2.0 100% x x x x x New Neighborhood Park E (Gap Area 25) 2.0 100% x x x x x New Neighborhood Park F (Gap Area 32) 2.0 100% x x x x x New Neighborhood Park G (Gap Area 36) 2.0 100% x x x x x New Neighborhood Park H (Gap Area 37) 2.0 100% x x x x x New Neighborhood Park I (Gap Area 34) 2.0 100% x x x x x Neighborhood Parks Subtotal 19.1
Pocket Parks
Standard and McFadden Park 0.7 100% x x x x x
Flower & 10th Park 0.7 100% x x x x x
Bristol Street Site A 0.7 100% x x x x x
Bristol Street Site B 1.8 100% x x x x x
17th Street Triangle Park Expansion 1.0 100% x x x x x
New Pocket Park A (Gap Area 8) 0.5 100% x x x x x
New Pocket Park B (Gap Area 12) 0.5 100% x x x x x
New Pocket Park C (Gap Area 17) 0.5 100% x x x x x
New Pocket Park D (Gap Area 27) 0.5 100% x x x x x
New Pocket Park E (Gap Area 38) 0.5 100% x x x x x
New Pocket Park F (Gap Area 41) 0.5 100% x x x x x
New Linear Pocket Park A (Gap Area 29) 1.0 100% x x x x x New Linear Pocket Park B (Gap Area 34) 1.0 100% x x x x x Pocket Parks Subtotal 9.9
Special Use Facilities
Aquatic Facility Partnership (Centennial Park) 100% x x Aquatic
Complex x x
Potential Neighborhood Center 0.2 100% x
Building
renovation x x
Special Use Facilities Subtotal 0.2
TABLE C-2: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED PARKS (CON’T) 280 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 281
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 154 5/17/2022
Park and Facility Inventory | A-2
Table C-1: Recommendations for Existing and Proposed
Reinvest
Sites
Total
Acreage
% of Acreage DevelopedPotential Expansion (See Planned, Proposed and Expanded Parks)Enhancement to Attract Residents From Farther AwayImproved Access to Existing ParkAcquire/ExpandMaster Plan or DesignDevelop ParkDevelop through PartnershipNew Major Facility Additions (Write-In)Improve Comfort Amenities Minor Park Renovation or ImprovementsMajor Park Renovation or ImprovementsMajor Facility RenovationTurf ConversionLandscaping/PlantingsStandard MaintenanceEnhanced MaintenanceNature Resource Stewardship Annual Asset
Management &
Replacement
Allowance
Site Intervention or
Site Info Opportunity

RECOMMENDATIONS
Acquire/Develop Improve/Enhance Maintain
Repair /
Restore

TOTAL PLANNED, PROPOSED AND EXPANDED
PARKS 173.2

TOTAL EXISTING AND PLANNED,
PROPOSED AND EXPANDED PARKS 532.3
TABLE C-2: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED PARKS (CON’T) 282 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 283
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 155 5/17/2022
APPENDIX D: ACQUISITION,

DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

GUIDELINES
This appendix presents guidelines for the acquisition,
design, development, and renovation of existing and
new parks systemwide.

Quality parks are noted by how successfully they
provide welcoming, inclusive greenspace and facilities
that support safety, sustainability, access, maintenance efficiencies, ecological values, community character, and diverse needs.
284 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 285
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 156 5/17/2022

LAND SUITABILITY
TG1. Ensure that all land within park site is of a
size and shape suitable for park use. Proposed
park sites that are too small (as defined by
park type), non-contiguous should not be
considered.

G2. Avoid elements that restrict the function,
development or usability of the land, such as
underground or overhead utilities, unsuitable
topography, or contamination. Avoid sites
with overly restrictive easements or other
development restrictions.

G3. Avoid open space and landscaped areas
not suitable for recreation:
• Landscaped Areas are a type of open space
that is maintained for community aesthetics
and beautification, but not for park use.

These may include medians, street rightsof-way, gateways along busy streets, public grounds around buildings, etc.
• Open space includes parks, but it may also
include commercial open space, vacant lands,
manicured landscaped areas, water channels
and rail infrastructure that is not suitable for
use as parkland.

TG4. Avoid small parks along busy roads or
intersections that are not conducive to social
gatherings or play.

G5. Carefully consider park sites with of an
irregular shape not conducive to park use.

Linear corridors along trails, however, may be
suitable to add recreation features.

G6. Carefully consider the return on investment
when acquiring sites already developed for
other uses, where demolition or redevelopment
may be costly.

G7. Carefully consider park sites with extensive
or excessive slopes, swales, drainage, creeks,
wetlands/biological habitat and similar
landscapes. Natural areas acquired for parkland
should be suitable for passive recreation at a
minimum.

G8. Avoid development credits for bike lanes,
sidewalks, landscaped areas not intended for
recreation, and private park areas open to
members only.

G9. Allow development credits for public/
private specialized facilities or greenspace
that meet the goals and objectives of the Park
Master Plan.

The ideal park and recreation system provides
an array of parks with amenities and facilities
appropriate to their size, scale, function, and
unique surroundings. While the character of
each park should be different, park elements
reflect specific standards and guidelines that
address park safety, usability, maintenance
efficiencies, sustainability, layout and location,
and accessibility. Site selection, park design,
and development choices should support
each park’s function so that diverse recreation
opportunities are provided and sustained om
Santa Ana into the future.

As noted in the Parks Master Plan, the City
of Santa Ana is deficient in park space
and should consider all options to acquire
additional parkland to meet Level of Service
(LOS) standards defined in Chapters 5 and 6.

However, this does not suggest that the City
should take any or all lands available.

To support a successful park system, this
appendix presents guidelines to assist in
acquiring and developing quality new parks
and renovating existing sites to reflect
new trends and the needs identified in this
Parks Master Plan. These specific guidelines
supplement the park policies identified the
Master Plan and shall be followed in addition
to other State and federal mandates for
park development. General acquisition and
development guidelines applicable to all
types of parks are presented first, followed by
specific guidelines by park type.

The following guidelines provide criteria for
land acquisition and development. Numbered
as Guideline (G) 1, 2, 3, etc. for reference,
these guidelines address land acceptability,
park design, and sustainability.

SYSTEMWIDE GUIDELINES FOR QUALITY PARKS
286 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 287
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 157 5/17/2022

LOCATION
G10. Locate each park site so surrounding uses
have minimal impact on park uses. To the extent
feasible, ensure that this park has a minimal
negative impact on surrounding residential
areas due to park uses, lighting, noise, traffic,
etc. Accordingly, residential back-on lots against
parks and side-on lots are discouraged.

G11. Strive to provide parks that are centralized
to the neighborhood or area it is intended to
serve.

G12. Allow parks that are co-located adjacent
to schools or other open space. Do not count
these areas as parkland unless they may be
developed and/or used for recreation.

G13. Where the park edge adjoins a private
property, ensure any physical barrier deemed
necessary occurs on the private property.

DESIGN AND MASTER PLANNING
G14. Prepare a site master plan or design
concept for each new park. Master planning,
phasing, timing, finance and maintenance
responsibilities should be addressed.

G15. Conduct a financial feasibility study and
business plan prior to acquiring or building
any major facility, such as a recreation center,
aquatic facility or stadium. Specify programming
requirements, operations, cost recovery rates,
revenue-generation strategies, and market
considerations to guide decisions on the types
and scale of amenities.

G16. Involve all key players in the master
planning and design process to address the
following issues: maintenance, renovation and
replacement costs, funding availability, public
safety, recreation programming, and ADA
accessibility.

G17. Provide opportunities for nearby
neighbors and relevant stakeholders to be
involved in park master planning and design.

G18. When master planning and designing
parks, be cognizant of local conditions,
including topography, site context, and
neighborhood character.

G19. Natural features, items of cultural or
historical significance, public art, and historic
and environmental interpretive elements should
be included in parks to contribute to park
identity and individual character.

G20. Develop distinct themes for each park
site to establish a unique character and identity.

Contingent with approved City palettes, themes
may be highlighted through the use of colors,
materials, furnishings, equipment and plant
selections.

G21. Ensure that proposed park design and
construction, including park amenities and
facilities, are consistent with City design detail
and specifications.

G22. Ensure that all elements, facilities,
materials and equipment are in compliance
with all current safety, accessibility and design
standards, laws, regulations and any other
mandated requirements.

G23. Emphasize public safety and security
by considering Crime Prevention through
Environmental Design (CPTED) guidelines in the
design and operations of parks and facilities.

Guidelines include the appropriate use or
exclusion of lights to deter crime, landscaping
to allow unobstructed views of surrounding
areas, and the location of play equipment and
other recreation facilities in areas that are highly
visible from the street.

G24. Balance maintenance impacts/costs with
creative park design to ensure that parks are
efficient, sustainable, and affordable to maintain
in the long-term. Greater customization may
be approved in citywide and special use parks,
while elements in neighborhood parks should be
designed for greater maintenance efficiencies.

G25. Incorporate new technologies into park
designs to facilitate operational efficiency.

G26. Standardize and preapprove design
choices for amenities such as trash receptacles,
bike racks, drinking fountains, restrooms,
benches, etc., in village parks, mini parks, and
linear parks for maintenance ease and cost
effectiveness. Customized amenities should
be reserved for high-use multi-use community
parks and special use parks.
288 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 289
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 158 5/17/2022

SUSTAINABILITY
G10. here the park edge adjoins a private
property, ensure any physica
G27. Implement a water efficiency program in
compliance with State water-use requirements
for irrigation and fixtures.

G28. Use environmentally sustainable park
development practices, materials, and
green building techniques. Pursue LEEDcompliant construction in the development of indoor facilities. This does not require LEED
certification.

G29. Encourage environmentally sustainable
landscape designs that minimize surface water
runoff.
• Use permeable surfacing in new paved trails
and parking lots where feasible.
• Incorporate bioswales and drainage channels
as a functional and aesthetic park feature,
where appropriate.

G30. Preserve habitat and natural resources
within parks.
• Design “no-mow” zones within parks in
appropriate places.
• Protect existing habitat for native species,
where appropriate.
• Plant natural vegetation in parking lot islands
where appropriate.

G31. Integrate sustainable plant materials in
landscaping where feasible.
• Use drought-tolerant plants where
appropriate.
• Minimize turf areas that are not designed to
support active or passive recreation use.
• Use lawn/turf substitutes in all park areas
not required for recreation. These include
grasses and ground cover plants that require
less water, fertilizers, and maintenance
(mowing) than traditional turf

PARK AMENITIES AND LAYOUT
G32. Ensure that all park elements, facilities,
materials and equipment comply with current
safety, accessibility and design standards,
laws, regulations and any other mandated
requirements.

G33. Ensure that neighborhood parks, as well
as smaller pocket parks intended to me the
needs of nearby neighbors, at a minimum
include some type of play features, an open
turf area, an active recreation element,
amenities to support social gatherings (seating,
tables), and shade.

G34. Locate amenities, such as play areas and
sports courts, safe distances from roadways,
but in areas that are visible from adjoining
streets to promote safety.
• Position play spaces a minimum of 50’
from street or parking areas, when park
configuration permits. Enclose play areas
that are closer than 25’ to arterial or collector
streets and parking areas with 3’ high nonclimbable fence.

G35. Design sports fields and sports courts
with a north-south orientation.

G36. Locate permanent restrooms in highly
utilized and visible areas in community,
citywide and special use parks to reduce
vandalism risks and deter undesirable behavior.

G37. Where appropriate, integrate lighting
for safety in all parks. Use lighting where
appropriate to extend the use of outdoor
facilities in community, citywide and special
use parks.

G38. Integrate non-lattice shade structures,
umbrellas, canopies, or trees to provide
adequate shade. Include shade in playground
designs.

G39. Integrate park equipment that is
specifically designed to withstand vandalism,
graffiti, and fire, as noted on a City-approved
list of site furnishings.

G40. Provide parking suited to the intended
use of the site and compliant with ADA
requirements. Strive to provide a minimum of
five parking spaces on site per park acre for
community, citywide and special use parks. If
sports fields are provided, 40 spaces per field
should be a minimum guideline.
290 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 291
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 159 5/17/2022

ENTRY, ACCESSIBILITY, AND

WAYFINDING
G32. Ensure that all park elements, facilities,
materials and equipment comply with current
safety, accessibility and design standards,
laws, regulations and any other mandated
requirements.

G41. Connect parks to surrounding
neighborhoods by sidewalks, bicycle lanes and/
or off-street trails to provide multiple ways of
accessing parks. Where possible, locate entry
near bus stop or crosswalk, or incorporate these
into the neighborhood design.

G42. Design parks using universal access
principles to facilitate access and movement
within parks for people of all ages and abilities.

Consider surfacing, path width, accessible
amenities and facilities.

G43. Provide a main entry which gives a sense
of arrival and entry. Entry point should include
park signage and may include special features.

G44. Design pathways to accommodate
maintenance and emergency vehicle access.

When feasible, include a separate entry for
maintenance vehicles away from the main entry
and away from active play areas.

G45. Locate garbage dumpsters for easy access
by trash pick-up vehicles, yet away from the park’s
main entry and away from active play areas.

G46. Provide a comprehensive wayfinding and
signage program across the network of parks,
trails, bikeways, and open space. The program
shall include signage, pavement markings, and
markers related to site identification, regulatory
signage, allowable uses, directions and distance,
wayfinding, and interpretive elements.

Santa Ana’s parks are classified by park type to
ensure a variety of parks across the system. The
following guidelines are organized by park type
and specify:
• Definition: Overall intent and vision for the park.
• Site Character & Adjacencies: Description of
park character and primary recreation features.
• Size and Configuration: Park size, shape,
location.
• Access: Guidelines related to parking, trails,
transit, entry, etc.
• Prioritized Recreation Elements: Desired
features and elements to support the site vision.
• Additional Recreation Elements to Consider:

Amenities and facilities that are suitable for
this park and may be considered during the
site-specific design process to provide more
diverse recreation experiences. (Note: This list
is not exhaustive and other types of appropriate
amenities and facilities may be considered.)
• Prioritized Support Amenities: Amenities
required to support park functionality and use.
• Landscaping and Vegetation: General
character of planting and irrigation.
• Additional Considerations: Additional notes
about items to consider, provide, or purposely
avoid.

These guidelines are intended to provide general
guidance to City staff, developers, partners or
others in the development and renovation of
parks. The specific numbers and types of facilities
will be determined in design and construction
documents. See Chapter 5 for additional
definitions of various types of amenities and
recreation facilities.

GUIDELINES BY PARK TYPE
292 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 293
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 160 5/17/2022

CITYWIDE PARKS
Citywide Parks are Santa Ana’s largest parks
that provide major recreation facilities, cultural
venues and natural areas that serve as citywide
destinations for events, programs and activities,
attracting visitors from across the entire city and
beyond. Typical facilities and features include
recreation centers, amphitheaters, swimming
pools, sports courts and fields, skate parks, lakes,
trails and trailheads, destination playgrounds
and group picnic areas. In addition to a variety
of support facilities, city parks may also include
concessions, reservable facilities or other
revenue-generating activities and infrastructure.

SITE CHARACTER & ADJACENCIES
• Parks are designed to reflect city identity and
culture
• Parks should be highly accessible, emphasizing
universal accessibility and perimeter access
• Parks along busy streets should include a buffer
to support safety and mitigate noise
• Maintain sight lines into parks from adjacent
streets
• Site design should encourage interaction with
the surrounding uses

SIZE & CONFIGURATION
• Typically 15 - 100 acres in size
• At least 50% of the site should be relatively
level and developable for recreation uses
• Contiguous, non-linear usable shape
ACCESS
• Accessible by auto, bus, bicycle or foot
• Should be located on a Class I or Class IV trail
• May also be accessible via on-street bike paths
• Sidewalks should connect to park paths for
walkers
• Has parking suitable for specialized and sport
facilities
• Should be located on a transit/bus line
• Should have wide paths so all areas of the park
are accessible to emergency vehicles
• Frontage on a collector or arterial street

PRIORITIZED RECREATION ELEMENTS
• Major recreation facilities
• Athletic facilities, sports fields and courts
• Natural features
• Trail rest stop/trailhead
• Loop trail or other pathway system
• Destination or universal, all-inclusive playground
• Covered group picnic shelters (large) with
barbecues, water, and food prep area
• Concessions, reservable facilities or other
revenue generating facilities
• Specialized or major facilities such as swimming
pools, amphitheaters, gardens, dog parks,
recreation/community centers and senior
centers that support programming
• Large group event space with utilities
• Art, cultural or historical interpretive features

ADDITIONAL RECREATION ELEMENTS TO

CONSIDER
• Additional group picnic shelters or areas (large,
medium, and small)
• Additional specialized facilities
• Open lawn for sitting and informal play

PRIORITIZED SUPPORT AMENITIES
• Permanent restrooms
• Off-street parking
• Facility access paths
• Tables, seating, drinking fountain, bike racks,
trash receptacles, and dog waste stations
• Shade (trees, shelters, canopies, sails)
• Park identification signage near main parking
lot, street entry, or visible frontage
• Wayfinding and interpretive signs
• Pedestrian-scale lighting throughout, plus
facility lighting
• Maintenance/storage facilities

LANDSCAPING & VEGETATION
• Low-to-medium maintenance plantings,
functional landscaping for most of the site
• Manicured sports field grass or synthetic turf
• Manicured lawn areas for informal play
• Trees for shade, habitat, and seasonal interest
(evergreen and deciduous)
• Drought-tolerant landscaping with drip
irrigation, in accordance with WELO
(California’s Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance).
• Bioswales for stormwater filtration

ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
• None
294 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 295
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 161 5/17/2022

COMMUNITY PARKS
Community parks are mid-size parks, which
support sports and group gatherings for several
neighborhoods or a portion of the city. Typical
facilities include sports fields and courts, small
group picnic areas, and specialized or unique
facilities such as swimming pools, recreation/
community centers and senior centers that
support programming. Community parks
typically include on-site parking, restrooms and
similar support amenities for longer site visits.

However, these sites typically have less variety
and less greenspace than larger city parks.

SITE CHARACTER & ADJACENCIES
• Parks are designed to reflect community
identity and culture
• Parks should be highly accessible, emphasizing
universal accessibility and perimeter access.
• Where the park is adjacent to a school, park
should be accessible from the school
• Parks along busy streets should include a buffer
to support safety and mitigate noise
• Maintain sight lines into parks from adjacent
streets
SIZE & CONFIGURATION:
• Typically 5-10 acres in size
• At least 75% of the site should be relatively
level and developable for recreation uses
• Contiguous, non-linear usable shape
• Access (parking, trails, transit, entry, etc.)
• Accessible by auto, bus, bicycle or foot
• Ideally located on a Class I or Class IV trail and/
or on-street bike paths
• Sidewalks should connect to park paths for
walkers
• Has parking suitable for specialized and sport
facilities
• Should be located on a transit/bus line
• Should have wide paths so all areas of the park
are accessible to emergency vehicles
• Frontage on a collector or arterial street

PRIORITIZED RECREATION ELEMENTS
• Sports fields and courts
• Play area, medium to large-scale
• Small to medium-size picnic shelter(s) with
barbecues
• Open lawn for programming, sitting and
informal play
• Specialized or unique facilities that support
programming

ADDITIONAL RECREATION ELEMENTS TO

CONSIDER
• Splash pad
• Community garden
• Additional play features such as skate spots,
bocce courts, ping pong tables, pump track,
etc.
• Off-leash dog area
• Loop trail
• Trail rest stop/trailhead
• Natural areas and trails
• Lighting for fields, courts, or pedestrian paths
• Event space with utilities
• Public art or interpretive element
• Major recreation facility, such as a recreation
center or aquatic facility

PRIORITIZED SUPPORT AMENITIES
• Permanent restrooms
• Off-street parking
• Facility access paths
• Tables, seating, drinking fountain, bike racks,
trash receptacles, and dog waste stations
• Shade (trees, shelters, canopies, sails)
• Park identification signage near main parking
lot, street entry, or visible frontage
• Wayfinding and interpretive signs
• Pedestrian-scale lighting throughout, plus
facility lighting
• Maintenance/storage facilities

LANDSCAPING & VEGETATION
• Low-to-medium maintenance plantings,
functional landscaping for most of the site
• Manicured sports field grass or synthetic turf
• Manicured lawn areas for informal play
• Trees for shade, habitat, and seasonal interest
(evergreen and deciduous)
• Drought-tolerant landscaping with drip
irrigation, in accordance with WELO
(California’s Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance).
• Bioswales for stormwater filtration

ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
• Avoid citywide or regional-scale facilities, such
as sports arenas, arboretums and zoos.
296 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 297
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 162 5/17/2022

NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
Neighborhood parks are small parks intended
to serve nearby neighbors. These sites provide
small-scale opportunities for play, picnicking
and leisure activities for residents that live within
walking or biking distance. Typical facilities
include playgrounds, picnic tables and open lawn
areas. Sports fields, sports courts and trailheads
also may be located within neighborhood parks
to provide opportunities for local recreation.

SITE CHARACTER & ADJACENCIES
• Neighborhood parks may be tucked into
neighborhoods, accessible only by foot or
bicycle.
• Pedestrian and bicycle-oriented wayfinding
and visibility are important to supporting
access and safe use.
• Parks should not be located adjacent to busy
arterial routes unless uses are buffered from
traffic and noise.

SIZE & CONFIGURATION
• Typically 1-5 acres in size
• Ideally minimum of 2 acres for new sites
• Contiguous, non-linear usable shape
• At least 90% of the site should be relatively
level and developable for recreation uses
ACCESS
• Access from local or collector streets
• Sidewalks should connect to park paths for
walkers
• May be located along a trail, bike route or
bikeway

PRIORITIZED RECREATION ELEMENTS
• Play area, ages 2-5 and 5-12
• Open lawn area
• Active recreation use (sports courts, outdoor
fitness equipment, skate spot, and/or youth
sports practice field)
• Family-size or small group picnic area
• Seating area

ADDITIONAL RECREATION ELEMENTS TO

CONSIDER
• Other small-scale active recreation resources
(climbing wall, ping pong tables, chess or
game tables, horseshoe pits, etc.)
• Outdoor fitness equipment
• Natural areas, but not throughout the entire
site
• Looped path or tricycle track

PRIORITIZED SUPPORT AMENITIES
• On-street parking or angle-in parking; small
parking lot for larger sites
• Facility access paths
• Perimeter path or sidewalks
• Tables, seating, drinking fountain, bike racks,
trash receptacles, and dog waste stations
• Shade (trees, shelters, canopies, sails)
• Park identification signage near main parking
lot, street entry, or visible frontage

LANDSCAPING & VEGETATION
• Trees for shade, habitat, and seasonal interest
• Drought-tolerant landscaping with drip
irrigation, in accordance with WELO
(California’s Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance).
• Manicured sports fields and lawn areas for
informal play

ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
• Avoid community, citywide, or regional scale
facilities
• Avoid lighted sports fields
• High-noise uses (e.g., basketball courts)
should be situated away from nearby housing
298 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 299
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 163 5/17/2022

POCKET PARKS
Pocket parks are small parks that provide
greenspace, passive social space, and in some
cases a small-scale recreation feature in areas
where providing Neighborhood Parks is not
feasible.

SITE CHARACTER & ADJACENCIES
• Small recreation and gathering spots that
support fitness and play near homes or along
trails
• Site should not be a small greenspace along a
busy road

SIZE & CONFIGURATION
• Typically less than 1 acre, but not less than 0.5
acres
• Minimum 0.25 acres
• At least 90% of the site should be relatively
level and developable for recreation uses
ACCESS
• Park accessible via sidewalk

PRIORITIZED RECREATION ELEMENTS
• Small open lawn area
• Gathering / leisure / picnic spaces (benches,
tables, seating)
• Play elements (ages 2-5 and 5-12)
• Activity station

ADDITIONAL RECREATION ELEMENTS TO

CONSIDER
• Larger play area (ages 2-5 and 5-12)
• Small shelter, shade structure, or gazebo
• Additional small-scale recreation resource (ping
pong table, chess tables, climbing structure,
swings, slide, etc.)
• Viewpoint
• Interpretive signage
• Community garden
• Trail rest stop

PRIORITIZED SUPPORT AMENITIES
• On-street parking
• Facility access paths
• Perimeter path or sidewalks
• Tables, seating, bike racks, trash receptacles,
and dog waste stations
• Shade (trees, shelters, canopies, sails)
• Park identification signage near street entry, or
visible frontage

LANDSCAPING & VEGETATION
• Low-maintenance landscaping (e.g., no-mow
grass)
• Trees for shade and seasonal interest
• Drought-tolerant landscaping with drip
irrigation, in accordance with WELO
(California’s Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance).
• Smaller, multi-use lawn for informal play

ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
• Avoid restrooms, drinking fountains,
community-scale facilities, lighting, buildings/
storage, barbecues, and high-maintenance
elements or landscaping (e.g., art, ornamental
plantings).
300 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 301
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 164 5/17/2022

URBAN PLAZAS
Urban plazas are small parks with hardscape
and greenspace that provide social gathering
opportunities in urban and commercial areas.

SITE CHARACTER & ADJACENCIES
• Are urban sites, primarily for social gatherings
and leisure, typically found in commercial
areas or office complexes
• Site may include a mix of hardscape,
greenscape, seating, and small event space to
support small social gatherings and outdoor
work. The site is intended to provide a
local place for lunches, work breaks, coffee,
and activities to serve the employees and
customers of nearby businesses.
• Serve the immediate area, including residents,
nearby employees, patrons of nearby
businesses, and visitors
• May be programmed to attract people
citywide
• Site design should encourage interaction with
the surrounding uses.

SIZE & CONFIGURATION
• Typically 0.5 – 3 acres in size, but may be as
large as 5 acres
• Minimum 0.25 acres
• Site should be relatively level and developable,
although terraces may be provided
ACCESS
• Accessible by auto, bus, bicycle or foot
• May be located on bikeway or bike route
• Sidewalks should connect to park paths for
walkers
• Ideally located on a transit/bus line
• Frontage on a collector or arterial street

PRIORITIZED RECREATION ELEMENTS
• Hardscape plaza
• Green landscaped areas
• Small amphitheater or small event space with
seatwalls
• Outdoor work infrastructure, including long
tables and chairs, electrical hookups, Wi-Fi,
and shade

ADDITIONAL RECREATION ELEMENTS TO

CONSIDER
• Coffee cart (operated by a concessionaire or
vendor)
• Small water feature, potentially with play/spray/
mist options that can be turned on and off
• Art (integrated or stand-alone)
• Utilities to support special events, food carts,
farmers markets, etc.
• Activity stations (lighted or unlighted)

PRIORITIZED SUPPORT AMENITIES
• Facility access paths
• Perimeter path or sidewalks
• Tables, seating, bike racks, trash receptacles
• Shade (trees, shelters, canopies, sails)
• Park identification signage near street entry, or
visible frontage
• Pedestrian-scale lighting
• Portable restrooms for events

LANDSCAPING & VEGETATION
• Medium to high-maintenance plantings,
functional landscaping for most of the site
• Trees for shade, habitat, and seasonal interest
(evergreen and deciduous)
• Drought-tolerant landscaping with drip
irrigation, in accordance with WELO
(California’s Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance).
• Bioswales for stormwater filtration

ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
• Avoid regional-scale facilities, such as sports
arenas, arboretums, recreation centers
• Site may include restrooms and drinking
fountains, but typically does not
302 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 303
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 165 5/17/2022

SPECIAL-USE FACILITIES
Special Use Facilities are sites that support
stand-alone major recreation facilities not located
within a larger park. These facilities are typically
fee-based and are only open when programmed
or reserved for use. Their hours of operation
and public use are limited. Examples include the
Santa Ana Zoo, stadium and tennis centers.

SITE CHARACTER & ADJACENCIES
• Parks are designed to reflect city identity and
culture
• Parks should be highly accessible, emphasizing
universal accessibility and perimeter access
• Site design should encourage interaction with
the surrounding uses

SIZE & CONFIGURATION
• Varies in size depending on facility use
• Site should be relatively level and developable
for recreation and/or gathering
ACCESS
• Accessible by auto, bus, bicycle or foot
• Ideally located on a Class I or Class IV trail and/
or on-street bike paths
• Has parking suitable for specialized facilities
• Should be located on a transit/bus line
• Should have wide paths so all areas of the park
are accessible to emergency vehicles
• Frontage on a collector or arterial street

PRIORITIZED RECREATION ELEMENTS
• Facilities vary depending on site use
• Art, cultural or historical interpretive features

ADDITIONAL RECREATION ELEMENTS TO

CONSIDER
• Play features or activity hub in addition to
special use
• Food or other concessions
• Natural areas
• Storage/maintenance buildings

PRIORITIZED SUPPORT AMENITIES
• Permanent restrooms
• On- or off-street parking
• Facility access paths
• Tables, seating, drinking fountain, bike racks,
trash receptacles, and dog waste stations
• Shade (trees, shelters, canopies, sails)
• Park identification signage near main parking
lot, street entry, or visible frontage
• Wayfinding and interpretive signs
• Pedestrian-scale lighting throughout, plus
facility lighting
• Maintenance/storage facilities

LANDSCAPING & VEGETATION
• Medium to high-maintenance plantings,
functional landscaping for most of the site
• Trees for shade, habitat, and seasonal interest
(evergreen and deciduous)
• Drought-tolerant landscaping with drip
irrigation, in accordance with WELO
(California’s Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance).
• Bioswales for stormwater filtration

ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
• None
304 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 305
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 166 5/17/2022
APPENDIX E: CAPITAL

AND OPERATIONS
COSTS
This appendix summarizes costs to carry
out recommended capital projects and
maintain the park system.

A significant investment is needed to
enhance and add parks to Santa Ana’s
park system. The City can use the costs
noted here to inform annual budgeting
and establish priorities for implementation.
306 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 307
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 167 5/17/2022
This appendix introduces the planning-level cost
estimates associated with recommendations for
existing parks and potential future park sites and
recreation facilities. It explains how capital and
operations costs were calculated for the Parks
Master Plan.

The estimates are based on general order-ofmagnitude in costs to assist in evaluating and prioritizing projects for future consideration
in the City-wide Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP). Costs are in 2022 dollars not accounting
for inflation. Recognizing the volatility of
pricing and supply chain issues, these costs
are intended to provide general guidance
for project planning. Actual costs will vary
from these estimates. For example, if the City
acquires a site that requires demolition and
clean-up to convert it to park spaces, cost may
be higher. If the City acquires a large parcel,
total land costs may be lower than shown. Most
costs will be further refined when site master
plans and construction documents are created,
prior to site development or renovation.

The costs noted here are more than the City
will likely spend over the next ten years. It does
not include costs associated with existing trail
maintenance or new trail development, which
are calculated in conjunction with transportation
planning. It does not include capital or operations
dollars for investment in joint-use school sites.

It is intended to inform conversations and
budgeting for parkland enhancements.

COST MODEL INTRODUCTION
Table E-1: Summary of Estimated Capital and
Operations Costs by Site presents total costs
by site based on planning level cost estimates.

These costs are aggregates of the detailed Table
E-2: Estimated Planning and Project Costs by
Site and Category, which includes the following
information as noted below. Costs are based
on per-acre or per-site costs for six different
classifications of sites, as shown in Table E-3.

Table rows are divided into two main sections:
1) Existing Parks; and 2) Planned, Proposed and
Expanded Parks. Within these two categories,
parks are divided into park types as inventoried.

CAPITAL PROJECTS
Capital costs represent one-time costs to acquire,
develop, build or renovate park infrastructure and
features.
• Acquire/Expand: This is a per-acre cost to
obtain new land for future park development.

Costs assume purchase of property and are
based on Santa Ana land cost estimates.

Sites may be acquired through other means
(e.g., easement, partnership) that would offset
acquisition costs.
• Master Plan or Design: This cost for site master
plans, design concepts and/or feasibility studies
assume a medium level of effort by designers/
planners based on industry profession averages.

Larger sites will have greater planning and
design costs.
• Develop Park: These estimates are fully loaded
costs to account for the development of all or
a portion of the site, as indicated in the “% of
acreage developed” definition. Costs for site
development will range in scale based on site
conditions and park type/design, so some costs
may be lower or higher than provided. Costs
are based on Southern California estimates
with updates by MIG based on cost averages of
comparable communities.
• Develop through Partnership: These cost
estimates apply to the City’s portion of estimated
cost for public/private project partnerships. These
are estimated based on information found in the
2022 City Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
• New Major Facility Additions: These cost
estimates apply to unique or specific features
added to a site. The costs are specifically
identified to cover the cost of the added facility.

These are estimated based on information found
in the 2022 CIP.
• Improve Comfort Amenities: Comfort
amenity improvements are anticipated to affect
approximately three percent of the developed
portion of the site. Costs are calculated at
three percent of full park development costs,
based on MIG estimates using averages of
comparable communities and projects.
• Minor Park Renovation or Improvements:

Minor renovations or improvements are
anticipated to affect approximately 15 percent
of the developed portion of the site. Costs are
calculated at 15 percent of full park development
costs, based on MIG estimates using averages of
comparable communities and projects.

ESTIMATED COSTS BY SITE
308 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 309
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 168 5/17/2022
• Major Park Renovation or Improvements:

Major renovations or improvements are
anticipated to affect approximately 30 percent
of the developed portion of the site. Costs are
calculated at 30 percent of full park development
costs, based on MIG estimates using averages of
comparable communities and projects.
• Turf Conversion: Turf conversions are
anticipated to affect approximately five percent
of the developed portion of the site. Costs
are calculated at five percent of full park
development costs, based on MIG estimates
using averages of comparable communities
and projects.
• Landscaping/Plantings: Landscape/Plantings
are anticipated to affect approximately two
percent of the developed portion of the site.

Costs are calculated at two percent of full park
development costs, based on MIG estimates
using averages of comparable communities
and projects.

MAINTENANCE
Maintenance costs are identified in three categories
and represent the estimated annual amount
needed to maintain existing parks and new parks
when developed. All sites receive at a minimum a
standard level of care to maintain developed and
natural areas. Some sites also receive a greater level
of maintenance as noted below.
• Standard Maintenance: The standard level
of maintenance includes routine monitoring,
inspection and care of recreation facilities,
natural areas and landscaping. Costs are
calculated for 100% of every site, reflecting
maintenance needs after sites are developed
or improved. These are estimated based on
expenditures for average park maintenance
costs, FY 2021-22 budget.
• Enhanced Maintenance: Enhanced
maintenance is needed at highly-visible, heavilyused sites that include specialized assets. Costs are based on the percentage of developed
acreage at selected sites and added to the basic
maintenance cost. These are estimated based
on expenditures for average park maintenance
costs, FY 2021-22 budget.
• Nature Resource Stewardship: Nature resource
stewardship is needed at larger Citywide Parks
that have lakes or undeveloped areas left in a
mostly natural state. These funds represent an
allowance to attend to preservation, restoration
or protection of natural resource areas. Costs are
assessed for the undeveloped/natural portions
of parks only. These are estimated based on
expenditures for average park maintenance costs,
FY 2021-22 budget.

REINVEST
This annual allowance may be set aside to offset
the costs of replacing facilities at the end of their
lifecycles. Funds can be used for major repairs,
but these funds are not intended to support
routine maintenance.
• Asset Management & Replacement: These
annualized costs are based on a 20-year
replacement schedule to update one-quarter of
the park, including landscaping and amenities.

Table E-2 introduces the allocations and per-acre
costs use to calculate total capital and operations
costs by site. Most costs apply to the developed
portions of parks only, or in the case of natural
resource stewardship, for the undeveloped/natural
portions of parks. Maintenance costs are assessed
for the entire site, reflecting the need to maintain
both developed facilities and natural areas.

These costs are differentiated for six park types.

In general, project costs are higher in parks with
more developed areas and specialized facilities,
as well as in small sites with more intensive
development and less open space
• Citywide Parks: provide major recreation
facilities, cultural venues and natural areas
that serve as citywide destinations for events,
programs and activities, attracting visitors
from across the entire city and beyond.
• Community Parks: support sports and group
gatherings for several neighborhoods or a
portion of the city.
• Neighborhood Parks: provide close-to-home
recreation opportunities.
• Pocket Parks: provide greenspace, passive
social space, and in some cases a small-scale
recreation feature.
• Urban Plazas: provide hardscape and
greenspace that provide social gathering
opportunities in urban and commercial areas.
• Special Use Facilities: support stand-alone
major recreation facilities not located within a
larger park. These facilities are typically feebased and only open when programmed or reserved for use.

PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS BY CATEGORY
310 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 311
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 169 5/17/2022
TABLE E-1: SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED CAPITAL AND OPERATIONS COSTS BY SITE TABLE E-1: SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED CAPITAL AND OPERATIONS COSTS BY SITE (CON’T) Sites
Total Capital Costs Total Maintenance Costs (annual)Total Capital Reinvestment/ Replacement

EXISTING PARKS
Community Parks
City Parks
Centennial Park $ 12,685,000 $ 457,000 $ 429,000
Santiago Park $ 10,219,000 $ 320,000 $ 341,000
Carl Thornton Park $ 8,999,000 $ 290,000 $ 304,000
Jerome Park $ 6,566,000 $ 193,000 $ 211,000
Memorial Park $ 40,754,000 $ 163,000 $ 178,000
City Parks Subtotal $ 79,223,000 $ 1,423,000 $ 1,463,000 Community Parks
Windsor Park $ 2,376,000 $ 130,000 $ 135,000
Bomo Koral Park $ 2,288,000 $ 125,000 $ 130,000
Lillie King Park $ 3,848,000 $ 125,000 $ 130,000
Delhi Park $ 1,980,000 $ 119,000 $ 124,000
Portola Park $ 1,820,000 $ 109,000 $ 114,000
El Salvador Park $ 3,648,000 $ 107,000 $ 111,000
Rosita Park $ 696,000 $ 104,000 $ 109,000
Riverview Park $ 2,490,000 $ 100,000 $ 104,000
Sandpointe Park $ 1,155,000 $ 92,000 $ 96,000
Cabrillo Park $ 2,812,000 $ 91,000 $ 95,000
Cesar Chavez Campesino Park $ 2,405,000 $ 78,000 $ 81,000 Heritage Park $ 1,088,000 $ 77,000 $ 80,000
Madison Park $ 1,920,000 $ 72,000 $ 75,000
Adams Park $ 1,254,000 $ 68,000 $ 71,000
Morrison Park $ 765,000 $ 61,000 $ 64,000
Santa Anita Park $ 1,122,000 $ 61,000 $ 64,000
Birch Park $ 720,000 $ 29,000 $ 30,000
Community Parks Subtotal $ 32,387,000 $ 1,548,000 $ 1,613,000 Community-Serving Parks Subtotal $ 111,610,000 $ 2,971,000 $ 3,076,000 Neighborhood Parks
Mabury Park $ 1,925,000 $ 30,000 $ 120,000
Edna Park $ 1,890,000 $ 20,000 $ 79,000
Jack Fisher Park $ 1,456,000 $ 14,000 $ 57,000
Angels Community Park $ 840,000 $ 9,000 $ 35,000
Pacific Electric Park $ 735,000 $ 8,000 $ 31,000
Saddleback View Park $ 473,000 $ 5,000 $ 20,000
Memory Lane Park $ - $ 3,000 $ 13,000
Chepa's Park $ 224,000 $ 2,000 $ 9,000
Mariposa Park $ - $ 2,000 $ 9,000
Colonel William W. Eldridge Park $ 315,000 $ 7,000 $ 26,000 Segerstrom Triangle Park $ 341,000 $ 7,000 $ 28,000
Neighborhood Parks Subtotal $ 8,199,000 $ 107,000 $ 427,000 Total Planning Level Costs
Table E-1: Summary of Estimated Capital and Operations Costs by Site Sites
Total Capital Costs Total Maintenance Costs (annual)Total Capital Reinvestment/ Replacement Total Planning Level Costs
Table E-1: Summary of Estimated Capital and Operations Costs by Site Other Parks and Facilities
Pocket Parks
Sarah May Downie Herb Garden $ - $ - $ 2,000
French Park $ - $ 1,000 $ 3,000
17th Street Triangle Park $ 280,000 $ 3,000 $ 11,000
Fairview Triangle Habitat Restoration $ 131,000 $ 3,000 $ 11,000 McFadden Triangle Park $ 150,000 $ 4,000 $ 13,000
Maple and Occidental Exercise Park $ 188,000 $ 5,000 $ 16,000 Friendship Park $ 21,000 $ - $ 2,000
Garfield Fitness Park $ 19,000 $ - $ 2,000
Pocket Parks Subtotal $ 789,000 $ 16,000 $ 60,000
Urban Plazas
Plaza Calle Cuatro $ - $ 1,000 $ 4,000
Sasscer Park $ 405,000 $ 6,000 $ 17,000
Civic Center $ - $ 27,000 $ 92,000
Urban Plazas Subtotal $ 405,000 $ 34,000 $ 113,000
Special Use Facilities
Santa Ana Zoo at Prentice Park $ 4,935,000 $ 338,000 $ 411,000 Santa Ana Stadium $ 1,838,000 $ 126,000 $ 153,000
Cabrillo Tennis Center $ - $ 65,000 $ 79,000
Neal Machander Tennis Center $ - $ 59,000 $ 72,000
Special Use Facilities Subtotal $ 6,773,000 $ 588,000 $ 715,000 Other Parks and Facilities Subtotal $ 7,967,000 $ 638,000 $ 888,000 TOTAL EXISTING PARKS $ 127,776,000 $ 3,716,000 $ 4,391,000

PLANNED, PROPOSED AND EXPANDED
PARKS
City Parks
Willowick Site $ 295,031,000 $ 821,000 $ 829,000
Centennial Park Expansion $ 11,063,000 $ 35,000 $ 39,000 Santiago Park Expansion $ 7,375,000 $ 24,000 $ 26,000
City Parks Subtotal $ 313,469,000 $ 880,000 $ 894,000
Community Parks
Griset Park (conversion for park use) $ 6,500,000 $ 78,000 $ 81,000 Warner Ave Site $ 52,800,000 $ 192,000 $ 200,000
El Salvador Park Expansion $ 5,935,000 $ 19,000 $ 20,000 Santa Anita Park Expansion $ 24,265,000 $ 87,000 $ 90,000 Cesar Chavez Campesino Park Expansion $ 9,055,000 $ 30,000 $ 32,000 Delhi Park Expansion $ 11,395,000 $ 39,000 $ 41,000
Community Parks Subtotal $ 109,950,000 $ 445,000 $ 464,000 Neighborhood Parks
Myrtle and Raitt Park $ 2,225,000 $ 6,000 $ 24,000
New Neighborhood Park A (Gap Area 1) $ 8,300,000 $ 11,000 $ 44,000 New Neighborhood Park B (Gap Area 14) $ 8,300,000 $ 11,000 $ 44,000 New Neighborhood Park C (Gap Area 19) $ 8,300,000 $ 11,000 $ 44,000 New Neighborhood Park D (Gap Area 21) $ 8,300,000 $ 11,000 $ 44,000 New Neighborhood Park E (Gap Area 25) $ 8,300,000 $ 11,000 $ 44,000 312 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 313
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 170 5/17/2022
TABLE E-1: SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED CAPITAL AND OPERATIONS COSTS BY SITE (CON’T) Sites
Total Capital Costs Total Maintenance Costs (annual)Total Capital Reinvestment/ Replacement Total Planning Level Costs
Table E-1: Summary of Estimated Capital and Operations Costs by Site New Neighborhood Park F (Gap Area 32) $ 8,300,000 $ 11,000 $ 44,000 New Neighborhood Park G (Gap Area 36) $ 8,300,000 $ 11,000 $ 44,000 New Neighborhood Park H (Gap Area 37) $ 8,300,000 $ 11,000 $ 44,000 New Neighborhood Park I (Gap Area 34) $ 8,300,000 $ 11,000 $ 44,000 Neighborhood Parks Subtotal $ 76,925,000 $ 105,000 $ 420,000 Pocket Parks
Standard and McFadden Park $ 2,600,000 $ 3,000 $ 11,000 Flower & 10th Park $ 2,600,000 $ 3,000 $ 11,000
Bristol Street Site A $ 2,425,000 $ 3,000 $ 10,000
Bristol Street Site B $ 6,555,000 $ 8,000 $ 29,000
17th Street Triangle Park Expansion $ 3,650,000 $ 5,000 $ 16,000 New Pocket Park A (Gap Area 8) $ 1,900,000 $ 2,000 $ 8,000 New Pocket Park B (Gap Area 12) $ 1,900,000 $ 2,000 $ 8,000 New Pocket Park C (Gap Area 17) $ 1,900,000 $ 2,000 $ 8,000 New Pocket Park D (Gap Area 27) $ 1,900,000 $ 2,000 $ 8,000 New Pocket Park E (Gap Area 38) $ 1,900,000 $ 2,000 $ 8,000 New Pocket Park F (Gap Area 41) $ 1,900,000 $ 2,000 $ 8,000 New Linear Pocket Park A (Gap Area 29) $ 3,650,000 $ 5,000 $ 16,000 New Linear Pocket Park B (Gap Area 34) $ 3,650,000 $ 5,000 $ 16,000 Pocket Parks Subtotal $ 36,530,000 $ 44,000 $ 157,000
Special Use Facilities
Aquatic Facility Partnership (Centennial Park) $ 8,500,000 $ - $ - Potential Neighborhood Center $ 6,000,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000 Special Use Facilities Subtotal $ 14,500,000 $ 4,000 $ 4,000

TOTAL PLANNED, PROPOSED AND
EXPANDED PARKS $ 551,374,000 $ 1,478,000 $ 1,939,000

TOTAL EXISTING AND PLANNED,
PROPOSED AND EXPANDED PARKS $ 679,150,000 $ 5,194,000 $ 6,330,000 314 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 315
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 171 5/17/2022
TABLE E-2: ESTIMATED PLANNING AND PROJECT COSTS BY SITE AND CATEGORY Reinvest
Sites
Acquire/ExpandMaster Plan or DesignDevelopDevelop through Partnership (WriteIn)New Major Facility Additions (Write-In)Improve Comfort Amenities 1Minor Park Renovation or Improvements 2Major Park Renovation or Improvements 3Turf ConversionLandscaping/PlantingsStandard MaintenanceEnhanced MaintenanceNature Resource Stewardship Annual Asset
Management &
Replacement
Allowance

EXISTING PARKS
Community Parks
City Parks
Centennial Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,284,750 $ 1,714,125 $ 685,650 $ - $ 391,800 $ 65,300 $ 428,531 Santiago Park $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,174,250 $ - $ 544,950 $ - $ 311,400 $ 8,650 $ 340,594 Carl Thornton Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,296,188 $ 1,216,031 $ 486,413 $ - $ 277,950 $ 12,263 $ 304,008 Jerome Park $ - $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,066,250 $ - $ - $ - $ 193,000 $ - $ 211,094 Memorial Park $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 14,262,500 $ - $ 20,000,000 $ - $ - $ 4,278,750 $ 713,125 $ - $ - $ 163,000 $ - $ 178,281 City Parks Subtotal $ - $ 4,500,000 $ 14,262,500 $ - $ 20,000,000 $ - $ - $ 35,100,188 $ 3,643,281 $ 1,717,013 $ - $ 1,337,150 $ 86,213 $ 1,462,508 Community Parks
Windsor Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,620,000 $ - $ 540,000 $ 216,000 $ - $ 129,600 $ - $ 135,000 Bomo Koral Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,560,000 $ - $ 520,000 $ 208,000 $ - $ 124,800 $ - $ 130,000 Lillie King Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,120,000 $ 520,000 $ 208,000 $ - $ 124,800 $ - $ 130,000 Delhi Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,485,000 $ - $ 495,000 $ - $ - $ 118,800 $ - $ 123,750 Portola Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,365,000 $ - $ 455,000 $ - $ - $ 109,200 $ - $ 113,750 El Salvador Park $ - $ 800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,670,000 $ - $ 178,000 $ - $ 106,800 $ - $ 111,250 Rosita Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 261,000 $ - $ - $ 435,000 $ - $ - $ 104,400 $ - $ 108,750 Riverview Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,490,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 99,600 $ - $ 103,750 Sandpointe Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,155,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 92,400 $ - $ 96,250 Cabrillo Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,280,000 $ 380,000 $ 152,000 $ - $ 91,200 $ - $ 95,000 Cesar Chavez Campesino Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,950,000 $ 325,000 $ 130,000 $ - $ 78,000 $ - $ 81,250 Heritage Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 960,000 $ - $ - $ 128,000 $ - $ 76,800 $ - $ 80,000 Madison Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,800,000 $ - $ 120,000 $ - $ 72,000 $ - $ 75,000 Adams Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 855,000 $ - $ 285,000 $ 114,000 $ - $ 68,400 $ - $ 71,250 Morrison Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 765,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 61,200 $ - $ 63,750 Santa Anita Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 765,000 $ - $ 255,000 $ 102,000 $ - $ 61,200 $ - $ 63,750 Birch Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 720,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 28,800 $ - $ 30,000 Community Parks Subtotal $ - $ 800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 261,000 $ 10,530,000 $ 15,030,000 $ 4,210,000 $ 1,556,000 $ - $ 1,548,000 $ - $ 1,612,500 Community-Serving Parks Subtotal $ - $ 5,300,000 $ 14,262,500 $ - $ 20,000,000 $ 261,000 $ 10,530,000 $ 50,130,188 $ 7,853,281 $ 3,273,013 $ - $ 2,885,150 $ 86,213 $ 3,075,008 Neighborhood Parks
Mabury Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,443,750 $ - $ 481,250 $ - $ 30,250 $ - $ - $ 120,313 Edna Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,890,000 $ - $ - $ 19,800 $ - $ - $ 78,750 Jack Fisher Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,365,000 $ - $ 91,000 $ 14,300 $ - $ - $ 56,875 Angels Community Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 840,000 $ - $ - $ 8,800 $ - $ - $ 35,000 Pacific Electric Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 735,000 $ - $ - $ 7,700 $ - $ - $ 30,625 Saddleback View Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 472,500 $ - $ - $ 4,950 $ - $ - $ 19,688 Memory Lane Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,300 $ - $ - $ 13,125 Chepa's Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 210,000 $ - $ 14,000 $ 2,200 $ - $ - $ 8,750 Mariposa Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,200 $ - $ - $ 8,750 Colonel William W. Eldridge Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 315,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 6,600 $ - $ - $ 26,250 Segerstrom Triangle Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 341,250 $ - $ - $ - $ 7,150 $ - $ - $ 28,438 Neighborhood Parks Subtotal $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,100,000 $ 5,512,500 $ 481,250 $ 105,000 $ 107,250 $ - $ - $ 426,563 Acquire/Develop Improve/Enhance Repair / Restore Maintain Table E-2: Estimated Planning and Project Costs by Site and Catego Park and Facility Inventory | A-1 316 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 317 Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 172 5/17/2022
TABLE E-2: ESTIMATED PLANNING AND PROJECT COSTS BY SITE AND CATEGORY (CON’T) Reinvest
Sites
Acquire/ExpandMaster Plan or DesignDevelopDevelop through Partnership (WriteIn)New Major Facility Additions (Write-In)Improve Comfort Amenities 1Minor Park Renovation or Improvements 2Major Park Renovation or Improvements 3Turf ConversionLandscaping/PlantingsStandard MaintenanceEnhanced MaintenanceNature Resource Stewardship Annual Asset
Management &
Replacement
Allowance
Acquire/Develop Improve/Enhance Repair / Restore Maintain Table E-2: Estimated Planning and Project Costs by Site and Catego Other Parks and Facilities
Pocket Parks
Sarah May Downie Herb Garden $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 450 $ - $ - $ 1,563 French Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 900 $ - $ - $ 3,125 17th Street Triangle Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 262,500 $ - $ 17,500 $ 3,150 $ - $ - $ 10,938 Fairview Triangle Habitat Restoration $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 131,250 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,150 $ - $ - $ 10,938 McFadden Triangle Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 3,600 $ - $ - $ 12,500 Maple and Occidental Exercise Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 187,500 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,500 $ - $ - $ 15,625 Friendship Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 18,750 $ - $ - $ 2,500 $ 450 $ - $ - $ 1,563 Garfield Fitness Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 18,750 $ - $ - $ - $ 450 $ - $ - $ 1,563 Pocket Parks Subtotal $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 506,250 $ 262,500 $ - $ 20,000 $ 16,650 $ - $ - $ 57,813 Urban Plazas
Plaza Calle Cuatro $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,300 $ - $ 3,750 Sasscer Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 405,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 5,850 $ - $ 16,875 Civic Center $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 26,950 $ - $ - $ 91,875 Urban Plazas Subtotal $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 405,000 $ - $ - $ 26,950 $ 7,150 $ - $ 112,500 Special Use Facilities
Santa Ana Zoo at Prentice Park $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,935,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 338,400 $ - $ 411,250 Santa Ana Stadium $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 1,837,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 126,000 $ - $ 153,125 Cabrillo Tennis Center $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 64,800 $ - $ 78,750 Neal Machander Tennis Center $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 59,400 $ - $ 72,188 Special Use Facilities Subtotal $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,772,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 588,600 $ - $ 715,313 Other Parks and Facilities Subtotal $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,278,750 $ 667,500 $ - $ 20,000 $ 43,600 $ 595,750 $ - $ 885,625 TOTAL EXISTING PARKS $ - $ 5,300,000 $ 14,262,500 $ - $ 20,000,000 $ 261,000 $ 19,908,750 $ 56,310,188 $ 8,334,531 $ 3,398,013 $ 150,850 $ 3,480,900 $ 86,213 $ 4,387,195

PLANNED, PROPOSED AND

EXPANDED PARKS
City Parks
Willowick Site $ 227,250,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 66,281,250 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 757,500 $ 63,125 $ 828,516 Centennial Park Expansion $ 7,965,000 $ - $ 3,097,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 35,400 $ - $ 38,719 Santiago Park Expansion $ 5,310,000 $ - $ 2,065,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 23,600 $ - $ 25,813 City Parks Subtotal $ 240,525,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 71,443,750 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 816,500 $ 63,125 $ 893,047 Community Parks
Griset Park (conversion for park use) $ - $ - $ 6,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 78,000 $ - $ 81,250 Warner Ave Site $ 36,000,000 $ 800,000 $ 16,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 192,000 $ - $ 200,000 El Salvador Park Expansion $ 3,555,000 $ 800,000 $ 1,580,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 18,960 $ - $ 19,750 Santa Anita Park Expansion $ 16,245,000 $ 800,000 $ 7,220,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 86,640 $ - $ 90,250 Cesar Chavez Campesino Park Expansion $ 5,715,000 $ 800,000 $ 2,540,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 30,480 $ - $ 31,750 Delhi Park Expansion $ 7,335,000 $ 800,000 $ 3,260,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 39,120 $ - $ 40,750 Community Parks Subtotal $ 68,850,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 37,100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 445,200 $ - $ 463,750 Neighborhood Parks
Myrtle and Raitt Park $ - $ 300,000 $ 1,925,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 6,050 $ - $ - $ 24,063 New Neighborhood Park A (Gap Area 1) $ 4,500,000 $ 300,000 $ 3,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,000 $ - $ - $ 43,750 New Neighborhood Park B (Gap Area 14) $ 4,500,000 $ 300,000 $ 3,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,000 $ - $ - $ 43,750 New Neighborhood Park C (Gap Area 19) $ 4,500,000 $ 300,000 $ 3,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,000 $ - $ - $ 43,750 New Neighborhood Park D (Gap Area 21) $ 4,500,000 $ 300,000 $ 3,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,000 $ - $ - $ 43,750 New Neighborhood Park E (Gap Area 25) $ 4,500,000 $ 300,000 $ 3,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,000 $ - $ - $ 43,750 New Neighborhood Park F (Gap Area 32) $ 4,500,000 $ 300,000 $ 3,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,000 $ - $ - $ 43,750 Park and Facility Inventory | A-2 318 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 319 Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 173 5/17/2022
TABLE E-2: ESTIMATED PLANNING AND PROJECT COSTS BY SITE AND CATEGORY (CON’T) Reinvest
Sites
Acquire/ExpandMaster Plan or DesignDevelopDevelop through Partnership (WriteIn)New Major Facility Additions (Write-In)Improve Comfort Amenities 1Minor Park Renovation or Improvements 2Major Park Renovation or Improvements 3Turf ConversionLandscaping/PlantingsStandard MaintenanceEnhanced MaintenanceNature Resource Stewardship Annual Asset
Management &
Replacement
Allowance
Acquire/Develop Improve/Enhance Repair / Restore Maintain Table E-2: Estimated Planning and Project Costs by Site and Catego New Neighborhood Park G (Gap Area 36) $ 4,500,000 $ 300,000 $ 3,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,000 $ - $ - $ 43,750 New Neighborhood Park H (Gap Area 37) $ 4,500,000 $ 300,000 $ 3,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,000 $ - $ - $ 43,750 New Neighborhood Park I (Gap Area 34) $ 4,500,000 $ 300,000 $ 3,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 11,000 $ - $ - $ 43,750 Neighborhood Parks Subtotal $ 40,500,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 33,425,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 105,050 $ - $ - $ 417,813 Pocket Parks
Standard and McFadden Park $ 1,575,000 $ 150,000 $ 875,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,150 $ - $ - $ 10,938 Flower & 10th Park $ 1,575,000 $ 150,000 $ 875,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,150 $ - $ - $ 10,938 Bristol Street Site A $ 1,462,500 $ 150,000 $ 812,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,925 $ - $ - $ 10,156 Bristol Street Site B $ 4,117,500 $ 150,000 $ 2,287,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 8,235 $ - $ - $ 28,594 17th Street Triangle Park Expansion $ 2,250,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,500 $ - $ - $ 15,625 New Pocket Park A (Gap Area 8) $ 1,125,000 $ 150,000 $ 625,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,250 $ - $ - $ 7,813 New Pocket Park B (Gap Area 12) $ 1,125,000 $ 150,000 $ 625,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,250 $ - $ - $ 7,813 New Pocket Park C (Gap Area 17) $ 1,125,000 $ 150,000 $ 625,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,250 $ - $ - $ 7,813 New Pocket Park D (Gap Area 27) $ 1,125,000 $ 150,000 $ 625,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,250 $ - $ - $ 7,813 New Pocket Park E (Gap Area 38) $ 1,125,000 $ 150,000 $ 625,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,250 $ - $ - $ 7,813 New Pocket Park F (Gap Area 41) $ 1,125,000 $ 150,000 $ 625,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,250 $ - $ - $ 7,813 New Linear Pocket Park A (Gap Area 29) $ 2,250,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,500 $ - $ - $ 15,625 New Linear Pocket Park B (Gap Area 34) $ 2,250,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,500 $ - $ - $ 15,625 Pocket Parks Subtotal $ 22,230,000 $ 1,950,000 $ 12,350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 44,460 $ - $ - $ 154,375 Special Use Facilities
Aquatic Facility Partnership (Centennial Park) $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 7,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Potential Neighborhood Center $ - $ 1,000,000 $ - $ - $ 5,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,600 $ - $ 4,375 Special Use Facilities Subtotal $ - $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 7,500,000 $ 5,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3,600 $ - $ 4,375

TOTAL PLANNED, PROPOSED AND
EXPANDED PARKS $ 372,105,000 $ 12,450,000 $ 154,318,750 $ 7,500,000 $ 5,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 149,510 $ 1,265,300 $ 63,125 $ 1,933,359

TOTAL EXISTING AND

PLANNED, PROPOSED AND
EXPANDED PARKS $ 372,105,000 $ 17,750,000 $ 168,581,250 $ 7,500,000 $ 25,000,000 $ 261,000 $ 19,908,750 $ 56,310,188 $ 8,334,531 $ 3,398,013 $ 300,360 $ 4,746,200 $ 149,338 $ 6,320,555 Park and Facility Inventory | A-2 320 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 321 Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 174 5/17/2022
TABLE E-3: PLANNING LEVEL COST BY PARK TYPE
Table E-3: Planning Level Costs by Park Typ
Reinvest
Improve Comfort Amenities Minor Park Renovation or ImprovementsMajor Park Renovation or ImprovementsTurf ConversionLandscaping/Plantings Asset Management & Replacement (Allowance)* 3% 15% 30% 5% 2% 25%

PARK TYPE PER ACRE PER SITE PER DEVELOPED ACRE

PER DEVELOPED
ACRE

PER DEVELOPED
ACRE

PER DEVELOPED
ACRE

PER DEVELOPED
ACRE

PER DEVELOPED
ACRE

PER DEVELOPED
ACRE

PER DEVELOPED
ACRE

PER DEVELOPED
ACRE

PER DEVELOPED
ACRE
Citywide Parks $2,250,000 $1,500,000 $875,000 write in write in $26,250 $131,250 $262,500 $43,750 $17,500 $7,000 $10,000 $2,500 $10,938 Community Parks $2,250,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 write in write in $30,000 $150,000 $300,000 $50,000 $20,000 $7,000 $12,000 N/A $12,500 Neighborhood Parks $2,250,000 $300,000 $1,750,000 write in write in $52,500 $262,500 $525,000 $87,500 $35,000 $5,500 $6,500 N/A $21,875 Pocket Parks $2,250,000 $150,000 $1,250,000 write in write in $37,500 $187,500 $375,000 N/A $25,000 $4,500 $5,500 N/A $15,625 Urban Plazas $2,250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 write in write in $45,000 $225,000 $450,000 N/A $30,000 $5,500 $6,500 N/A $18,750 Special Use Facilities $2,250,000 $1,000,000 $1,750,000 write in write in N/A $262,500 $525,000 N/A $35,000 $12,000 $18,000 N/A $21,875 Funds are in 2022 dollars not accounting for inflation.

Acquire/Develop Improve/Enhance Maintain
*This annual allowance may be set aside to offset the costs of replacing facilities at the end of their lifecycles. These annualized costs are based on a 20‐year replacement schedule to update one‐quarter of the park, including landscaping and amenities. Acquire/Expand Master Plan or Design Develop Park Develop through Partnership New Major Facility Additions Standard Maintenance Enhanced Maintenance Nature Resource Stewardship Note:
322 SANTA ANA PARKS MASTER PLAN APPENDICES 323
Exhibit A Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 175 5/17/2022
Parks, Recreation and Community Services Commission
Regular Meeting Agenda
April 28, 2022
VIRTUAL MEETING The Zoom Link for the meeting is: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/89203203214 ID Number is: 892 0320 3214#
5:30 PM
Advisory Group
Carl Benninger, Santa Ana Communication- Linkage, VP
Citlali Ruiz, Invest In Youth Santa Ana
Cynthia Guerra, Rise Up Willowick Coalition
Dale Helvig, Northern Santa Ana Preservation Alliance (NSAPA), Chairperson Dave Elliott, Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce, President & CEO Dorian Romero, Santa Ana Active Street (SAAS)
Flor Barajas, Rise Up Willowick Coalition
Frank Bejarano, KidWorks / Sonia Rios
Frank Gutierrez, Arts and Cultural Commission, Chairperson Gabrielle Gutierrez, PRCSA, Ward 1 Representative & Chairperson Hatefas Yop, The Cambodian Family Community Center
Hector Bustos, Santa Ana Youth Ballot
Hilda Ortiz, Latino Health Access, Program Coordinator
Jennifer S. Wang, Asian American Senior Citizens Service Center (AASCSC), COO Jim Burns, AASCSC
Joel Cazares, SA Building Healthy Communities (SABHC)
Karla Juarez, THRIVE Santa Ana
Ken Nguyen, Little Saigon Foundation
Kristopher Fortin, Santa Ana Active Street (SAAS)
Laura Pantoja, Latino Health Access
Maricela Castro, VELA
Mark McLoughlin, Planning Commission, Chairperson
Ray Diaz, Youth Commission, Chairperson
Richard Santana, Community Development Comm., Chairperson Robyn MacNair, Santa Ana Unified School District
Ruben Barreto, Santa Ana Building Healthy Communities (SABHC) Vattana Peong, The Cambodian Family Community Center
AG - Clarifying Questions
● SAAS - Kristopher: Comments :
○ Map - different parks are list - corazones verdes - privately own - what is the impact of Private parks
○ indegenious community involvement - connection of native planting and people who are/ were stewards,
City Council 14 – 176 5/17/2022
○ maps for connections to trail- Bristol from gap in warner and edinger - willerwick acquisition support - continue more acquisition but consider access ● Thrive SA - Luis
○ Thank you, long time coming
○ Echo emphasis of acquisition, esp willowick
○ Add policy language to increase budget allocation - seems limited in the ability to get and maintain what is desired by the Community - yes to grant funding but also increasing the budget
○ Staff is very limited as it is- staff is largely restricted due to time and money ○ Want to do more collaborative programming
● Roberto Herrera
○ Reference to possible inc. in fee - what would the fee scale look like? ○ What is the alternative to the acquisition, more than just direct payment? ○ More gathering spaces - Community rooms in conjunction with the parks ● Karla Juarez -
○ Recognizing the indigenous people
○ Acquisition of Willowick
○ Have seen current “improvement” are those are included in the plan - seems the city is making decisions on what a park looks like - est. and keep to the getting community input then making changes according to input
○ See a report on the surplus land in SA to see how the land can be used ○ Don’t see the community’s needs being met - feel like it is been misuse ○ Emphasis community agreement
Lisa - Cannabis funding - money has been spent to before because it became available ● CEA - Latino Health access
○ Acquisition Willowick / land, in general,
○ Add anti-displacement strategies - Don’t want green gentrification ○ Similar to the housing element lang. In the GPU
● Richard Santana
○ Thank you
○ Focus on lighting and striping on trails
● Magnolia Moreno - Office congressman - Corea
○ Letter of support for Willowick golf course Acquisition ● Thrive SA,
○ Glad to hear about Land Trust - want to look at that model more ○ Make sure land is in the hand of the community
○ Many comments were positive. What is the next step to incorporate comments? Will changes be made before going to the council?
Commissioners
Andres Ramirez Vice-Chair Mayoral Rep
Amina Sen-Matthews Ward 1
Angie Gomez Ward 2
Vacant Ward 3
Cory Nelson Ward 4
Ruby Woo Ward 5 City Council 14 – 177 5/17/2022
Alfredo Torreblanca Ward 6
Lisa Rudloff Executive Director
William Sandoval Recording Secretary
Commission Comments
● Woo
○ Like the Acquisition of more land in general
○ Concerned about adding programs- plan for that and how community centers can be used
■ Including Splash pads/services/equipment (el Salvador park) ○ Concerned about inc. park fees and notification on the cost of the fees Lisa Rudloff
- programming in the past - cannabis funding now for children programs - in a better place now - currently hiring more staff - more programs and services - going to give money to nonprofits - Impact fees are associated with development and new land ● Nelson
○ More space - think it would be better to improve joint use agreement to manage and utilize, underutilized and neglected by school and city - gets political - need to fight for the community - has the school been approached?
○ Improve lighting - most recreation is after 4 pm
○ Liked the approach
● Ramirez
○ Clarification: City (Citywide services >15 acres) v. Community park? ○ More focus on indigenous community and culture/ heritage / joint use agreement ○ Valley HS - Carl Elementary - attempt in the area - open the gate - improve school/ parks - prioritize over acquisition - add to the mutual relationship. Get to save ○ Graph - Safety was a huge concern - more effort to minimize as much as possible ○ Acquisition of Willowick is huge - want to see a big push for that ○ Stewardship/cleanliness - make sure parks are clean - willing to do promotion/ work on the weekend to clean - del mar park
○
Lisa - Currently in discussion with SAUSD - going to have a separate subcommittee - city council aware of the need amendment of the joint use agreement
Motion by Commissioner Woo, 2nd Commissioner Nelson - Motion passes to push the PMP to Council
- Sen-Matthew - Appreciate the work - excited to see it come to fruition - Woo - Impressed - stress concerns for changes and listening to the community, Hand ball park in SA Park
- Nelson - Conflicts with field renovation, youth programs work together and manage to collaborate. Want to emphasize joint use - Valley sports complex- very underutilized - premiere park that is barely used
- Creating a scholarship program for sports leagues for youth -
City Council 14 – 178 5/17/2022
City Council Meeting: Draft Plan Review
Tuesday, May 17, 2022
City Council 14 – 179 5/17/2022
Parks Master Plan Review
I. Draft Plan Presentation
II. Comments/Desired Changes
III. Decision on Approval to Finalize Plan
City Council 14 – 180 5/17/2022

PARKS MASTER PLAN
Santa Ana is creating its very first Parks Master Plan to guide investment in parks, facilities, trails, programs, and open space.

This long-range plan will help prioritize park projects for the next ten years.

PARKS, RECREATION
& OPEN SPACE PLAN
City Council 14 – 181 5/17/2022

PLAN ORGANIZATION
• Executive Summary
• Ch 1: Introduction
• Ch 2: Park System Overview
• Ch 3: Santa Ana Community
• Ch 4: Park Access, Equity and Opportunities
• Ch 5: Facility, Trails, and Program Needs
• Ch 6: Systemwide Recommendations
• Ch 7: Site Recommendations
• Ch 8: Action Plan
• Glossary
City Council 14 – 182 5/17/2022

APPENDICES
• A. Park and Facility Inventory
• B. Park Access and Equity Analysis
• C. Site Recommendations
• D. Acquisition, Design and
Development Guidelines
• E. Capital Improvement Plan
City Council 14 – 183 5/17/2022
Planning Process PLANNING PROCESS
Project Timeline
Winter/ Spring 2021 Spring 2022
City Council 14 – 184 5/17/2022

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
General Plan outreach findings, plus:
• 2,000+ residents
• 6 committees, commissions, advisory groups
• 16 pop-up events
• 24 partners & stakeholder organizations
• 3 staff groups
• Outreach in English, Spanish, and Vietnamese
City Council 14 – 185 5/17/2022

PARKS MASTER PLAN
City Council 14 – 186 5/17/2022
City Council 14 – 187 5/17/2022

COMMUNITY PRIORITIES
• Safe and inclusive parks
• Diverse parks and green spaces
• Dynamic programming
• Equitable recreation opportunities
• Green connections
• Community culture and identity
• Youth engagement and development
• Health and wellness
City Council 14 – 188 5/17/2022

MAP OF GREEN SPACE
City Council 14 – 189 5/17/2022

MAP OF GREEN SPACE
City Council 14 – 190 5/17/2022

MAP OF GREEN SPACE
City Council 14 – 191 5/17/2022

ADDITIONAL ANALYSES
• Needs in 5 focus areas
• Major facilities distribution
• Active recreation distribution
• Other land acquisition opportunities
City Council 14 – 192 5/17/2022

DESIRED LEVEL OF SERVICE
• Desired level of service
and needs for:
• Parkland
• Recreation facilities
• Trails
• Events and programs
Category Existing
Acres
Existing
LOS
(acres/
1,000)
Proposed
LOS
(acres/
1,000)
Future
Need in
Acres
# of New
or
Expanded
Parks
City
Parkland
361.8 1.1 1.5 176.3 33
Joint-Use
School Sites

13.3 .04 .15 41.1 26
Trail
Corridors

23.3 .07 .20 49.2 25 miles
Total 398.4 1.2 1.85 266.6 59 sites
+ 25
miles
Level of Service (LOS) is a metric used to
measure the amount of assets or services
needed. For land, it is expressed as a ratio
of park acreage to 1,000 residents served.

Minimum Parkland LOS: 1.5 acres/1,000
residents; 2-3 acres per 1,000 residents to
serve new developments.

City Council 14 – 193 5/17/2022

OUR MISSION AND VALUES
• The PMP supports the City’s vision and values as
identified in the 2022 General Plan update:
• Health
• Equity
• Sustainability
• Culture
• Education
City Council 14 – 194 5/17/2022

PARKS MASTER PLAN INITIATIVES
• Parkland: Acquire and develop parks to increase the amount of parkland and create an integrated park and open space system. • Equity, Access, and Environmental Justice: Ensure that all residents in Santa Ana have equitable access to inclusive parks and healthy recreation opportunities that serve all ages, abilities, and unserved or underserved areas in the City.
• Trail Connectivity: Create a walkable, bikeable, and interconnected city by providing a network of off-street bicycle and pedestrian trails. • Recreation Diversity: Create unique and vibrant recreation facilities that reflect the character, identity, and needs of Santa Ana’s diverse community. City Council 14 – 195 5/17/2022

PARKS MASTER PLAN INITIATIVES
• Activity: Facilitate events, programs, sports, and indoor and outdoor recreation activities to support community health, fitness, empowerment, development, and lifelong learning.
• Stewardship: Manage and maintain Santa Ana’s parks and recreation assets through good stewardship, proactive asset management, and the wise use of resources to support a sustainable, resilient, safe, and comfortable park system.
• Collaboration: Engage residents, partners, volunteers, local businesses, and other agencies in enhancing parks and recreation opportunities.
• Investment: Diversify funding, generate revenues, and support the capital and operational investment needed to enhance the park and recreation system. City Council 14 – 196 5/17/2022
RECOMMENDED 10-YEAR CIP
% of Sites Recommended for Capital Projects
City Council 14 – 197 5/17/2022
10-YEAR CIP: NEW PARKS
Proposed New Parkland by Type (Additional Acres)
City Council 14 – 198 5/17/2022

ADDITIONAL GUIDELINES
• Acquisition, design and
development guidelines
• Transformative projects
City Council 14 – 199 5/17/2022
10-YEAR COSTS
Three different asset costs:
• Capital
• Maintenance
• Reinvestment & Replacement
• (Administration, Programs)
Residential Impact Fee:
• Only applied to capital expansion
• $43 million through 2030
City Council 14 – 200 5/17/2022

COSTS AND INVESTMENT STRATEGY
Existing Parks
Parkland: 1.5 acres/1,000
Trail Corridors: 0.2 acres/1,000
Joint-Use Sites: 0.15 acres/1,000
TOTAL 1.85 acres/1,000 residents
$128 million + $3.7 million annually
$550 million + $1.5 million annually
TBD with transportation planning
TBD via Joint Use Agreement
More than $680 million +
$5.2 million annually
Projects: Costs:

City Council 14 – 201 5/17/2022

ACTION PLAN

1. Prioritize maintenance and asset management.

2. Increase park impact fees for new development.

3. Redirect other funds to parks.

4. Explore voter-approved tax measures and other public and private support.

5. Create a park opportunity fund.

6. Pursue key land acquisition opportunities.

City Council 14 – 202 5/17/2022

ACTION PLAN

7. Develop the Golden Loop and Key trail corridors.

8. Evaluate additional park acquisition opportunities.

9. Explore other acquisition mechanisms as an alternative to direct purchase.

10.Update joint-use agreements with SAUSD.

11.Evaluate the return on investment before proceeding with major facility development.

12.Extend cost recovery recommendations to new programs & services.

City Council 14 – 203 5/17/2022
Potential Document Revisions
City Council 14 – 204 5/17/2022

PRCSA COMMISSION/ADVISORY GROUP
• Change heading on Action Item #3 to: Increase
Funding for Parks (CH 8).
• Add policy: Strengthen relationships and
partnerships with indigenous communities (CH 7,

7.1f)
• Emphasize needs for meeting rooms and indoor
gathering spaces (CH 5, Table 5-4).
• Add policy: Compile and regularly update a
surplus lands and private parks report to inform
acquisition opportunities (CH 6, 1.1, g).
• Add design guideline: Provide lighting and striping
on Class I trails for safety (Appendix D).
• Add design guideline: Improve park lighting for
safety (Appendix D). City Council 14 – 205 5/17/2022

OTHER CHANGES AND CORRECTIONS
• Add policy: Preserve existing park acreage by
ensuring that parkland developed through grant
funding is sustained for park and recreation
uses into perpetuity, especially where required
by granting agencies (CH 6, 1.2e)
• Correct typos, mislabeled headings, and
formatting issues.
• Update the Acknowledgements page.
• Insert omitted list of City values and heading
(Executive Summary, p. vii).

City Council 14 – 206 5/17/2022
Comments?
• What do you like about the Master Plan?
• What would you change or add to the Master Plan?
City Council 14 – 207 5/17/2022
In conjunction with:

Economic & Planning Systems
City Council 14 – 208 5/17/2022
Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 15
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
May 17, 2022
TOPIC: Local Street Preventative Maintenance FY 2021-22

AGENDA TITLE
Award a Construction Contract to All American Asphalt in the Amount of $2,109,832 for the Local Street Preventative Maintenance FY 2021-22 Project with an Estimated Project Delivery Cost of $2,778,000 (Project No. 22-6907) (Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Award a construction contract to All American Asphalt, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $2,109,832, for construction of the Local Street Preventative Maintenance FY 2021-22, for the term beginning May 17, 2022 and ending upon project completion, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract, subject to non-substantive changes approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney.

2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $2,778,000, which includes $2,109,832 for the construction contract, $316,500 for contract administration, inspection and testing, and a $351,668 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work.

DISCUSSION
The City's Pavement Management Program has been developed to identify the preventive maintenance requirements for the City's street network. The local street segments (Exhibit 1) recommended for the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Local Street Preventative Maintenance Capital Improvement Project have been identified as high priority for slurry seal. The recommended work consists of localized replacement of asphalt concrete pavement, slurry seal resurfacing, crack sealing, striping, and signage. The improvements also include replacement of damaged concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and curb ramps. Once completed, these improvements will improve the City's overall pavement condition, enhance the visual appearance of the street, upgrade ride quality, and support compliance with Americans with Disability Act standards.

Public Outreach and Contractor Participation
To provide an opportunity for local vendors to submit bids, the City notified a total of 837 regional vendors via PlanetBids, many of which are Santa Ana based. Four vendors City Council 15 – 1 5/17/2022
Award Construction Contract to All American Asphalt
May 17, 2022

requested bidding documents, and a total of four bids were received. No bids were received from Santa Ana contractors.

As legally required, a Notice Inviting Bids was advertised in the Orange County Register newspaper on March 7 and March 14, of 2022. The project was also advertised in PlanetBids from March 2, 2022 through March 24, 2022. Bids were received electronically via PlanetBids on March 24, 2022.

Bid Results Summary
RANK BIDDER’S NAME LOCATION BASE BID
1 All American Asphalt Corona $2,109,832
2 EBS General Engineering Inc. Corona $2,435,088
3 R.J. Noble Company Orange $2,487,280
4 Excel Paving Co Long Beach $2,844,500
A total of four bids were received, and all were deemed responsive. All American Asphalt submitted the lowest responsive base bid in the amount of $2,109,832 (Exhibit 2). As specified in the bid documents, the lowest bid shall be determined on the basis of the Base Bid. Based on the bid analysis and a contractor’s reference check, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to All American Asphalt, in the amount of the base bid totaling $2,109,832 (Exhibit 3). All American Asphalt has performed the following work in the City of Santa Ana within the past 5 years: Flower Street Rehabilitation (Project No. 21-6976), Residential Street Repair Program FY 2019/20 (Project No. 20-7533), and Local Street Preventative Maintenance FY 2019-20 (Project No. 20-6907).

Project Delivery
To deliver a complete project, in addition to the construction contract, the estimated total project delivery cost includes construction administration, inspection, and testing, along with an allowance for contingencies to account for unexpected or unforeseen conditions.

Construction administration and inspection includes the following: construction management; implementation of the City’s Community Workforce Agreement requirements; inspection of the contractor’s work to ensure contract compliance, workmanship, and quality; and materials testing. As indicated in the Cost Analysis (Exhibit 4) and as summarized in the table below, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $2,778,000.

Project Item Total
Construction Contract $2,109,832
Construction Administration, Inspection, Testing $316,500 City Council 15 – 2 5/17/2022
Award Construction Contract to All American Asphalt
May 17, 2022

Project Item Total
Contingencies $351,668
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST $2,778,000

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER2022-17 was filed for the project.

FISCAL IMPACT
As indicated in the Cost Analysis, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $2,778,000, which includes construction, contract administration, inspection, testing, and an authorized contingency.

The following table summarizes the funds budgeted and available for expenditure to deliver construction of this project.

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit -
Account No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit - Account
No. Description Amount
2021-22 03217662-66220
(22-6907)
Measure MStreet
Construction
Measure M2 Local
Fairshare, Improvements
Other Than Building
$2,778,000
Total $2,778,000

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Location Map

2. Bid Proposal

3. Construction Contract

4. Cost Analysis
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager
City Council 15 – 3 5/17/2022
PWA

SANTA ANA

PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
Project No. 22-6907

LOCAL STREET PREVENTATIVE
MAINTENANCE FY21-22
EXHIBIT 1
City Council 15 – 4 5/17/2022
200.00 80,000.00

0.20 89,600.00
110.00 616,000.00
44,000.00 44,000.00
700.00 770,000.00

8.00 73,600.00

59.00 19.00

13.00 11.50
485.00
885.00
785.00
47,200.00
57,000.00
159,900.00
8,050.00
16,005.00
31,860.00
48,670.00
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 15 – 5 5/17/2022
785.00
1,040.00
3,141.00
15,800.00
25,900.00
3,925.00
1,040.00
6,282.00
15,800.00
25,900.00
2,109,832.00
City Council 15 – 6 5/17/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
rev. 09/01/2017 Page 1 of 3
PROJECT 22-6907
LOCAL STREET PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE FY21-22
This CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT is made and entered into this 17th day of May, 2022 by and between the City of Santa Ana, California, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter “CITY”), and All American Asphalt (hereinafter “CONTRACTOR”).

WITNESSETH:

The CITY and the CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows:

1. CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all the work and furnish all the materials at its own cost and expense necessary to construct and complete in a good and workmanlike manner and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the CITY, the Local Street Preventative Maintenance FY21-22 (hereinafter referred to as the “WORK OF IMPROVEMENT”) identified in and in accordance with the Contract Documents prepared by the City’s Public Works Agency and approved by the City Council.

2. The complete Construction Contract consists of the “Contract Documents” as defined by the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and which include the following:
 Notice Inviting Bids
 Information to Bidders
 Bid Proposal
 Bid Bond
 Contract Form
 Contract Bonds
 General Provisions
 Special Provisions
 Technical Provisions and Project Plans
 Community Workforce Agreement
 Appendices
In case of conflict between the Contract Documents, the precedence of documents shall be as established in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction.

3. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT the sum total amount not to exceed Two Million One Hundred Nine Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty-Two Dollars and No Cents ($2,109,832.00), as set forth and identified in the BID PROPOSAL, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A.” The BID PROPOSAL contains a schedule of unit price(s) or lump sum(s) based on approximate quantities only, and the City does not expressly or by implication agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class or portion of the work or to omit portions of the work as may be deemed necessary or advisable.

EXHIBIT 3
City Council 15 – 7 5/17/2022
City Council 15 – 8 5/17/2022
City Council 15 – 9 5/17/2022
City Council 15 – 10 5/17/2022
EXHIBIT 4
Construction Contract $ 2,109,832
Contract Administration, Inspection and Testing $ 316,500 Contingencies $ 351,668
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 2,778,000
CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT NO. 22-6907: Local Street Preventative Maintenance FY21-22

COST ANALYSIS
City Council 15 – 11 5/17/2022
Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 16
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
May 17, 2022
TOPIC: Sidewalk Concrete Repairs Project

AGENDA TITLE
Approve the Second Amendment to the Construction Contract with CJ Concrete Construction, Inc., to Increase the Contract Amount by $2,000,000 to Perform Additional Concrete Repairs through the End of Project Completion (Project No.22-6970) (General and Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Authorize the City Manager to approve the second amendment to the construction contract with CJ Concrete Construction, Inc., by an increase of $2,000,000, to perform additional concrete improvements through the end of project completion, for a new estimated project delivery cost of $3,700,000.

2. Approve the revised Project Cost Analysis increasing Construction Administration, Inspection, and Testing by $50,000 and the project contingencies by $1,950,000, for a new estimated project delivery cost of $3,700,000.

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency’s Maintenance Services Division is responsible for maintaining 400 miles of streets and 800 miles of sidewalks located within the City of Santa Ana. Staff evaluates the condition of damaged sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and driveways to identify uneven surfaces and cracks that may pose a risk to pedestrians. The goal is to improve safe walking accessibility for pedestrians and increase active modes of transportation, such as walking and biking. Additionally, this reduces the potential of liability claims and assists in complying with regulations set forth by the American with Disabilities Act.

Procedures to mitigate these conditions include offset grinding, temporary asphalt ramping, and removal/replacement of damaged concrete areas.

On November 16, 2021, the City Council awarded a contract to CJ Concrete Construction, Inc., for various concrete repair projects involving the repair of damaged sidewalks, curbs, gutters, driveway approaches, and curb ramps. Prioritization of work is focused on areas with the highest concentration of needed repairs (Exhibit 1). Projects have been completed or are underway in each of the City’s six wards, including Riverview West (Ward 1), New Horizons (Ward 2), Pacific Park (Ward 2), West Floral Park (Ward 3), City Council 16 – 1 5/17/2022
Sidewalk Concrete Repairs Project
May 17, 2022

South Coast (Ward 4), Willard (Ward 5), Willits & Sullivan (Ward 5), Wilshire Square (Ward 6), and Madison Park (Ward 6) neighborhoods. Upcoming projects are planned for Morning Sunwood (Ward 1), Pico-Lowell (Ward 2), Riverview (Ward 3), Valley Adams (Ward 4), Artesia-Pilar (Ward 5) and Delhi (Ward 6) neighborhoods, and other areas with the highest concentration of needed repairs.

Staff recommends amending the construction contract with CJ Concrete Construction, Inc. to increase the contract capacity by $2,000,000, for a new estimated project delivery cost of $3,700,000, in order to capitalize on the favorable pricing of the existing contract and complete these concrete repair projects promptly. CJ Concrete Construction, Inc. has demonstrated a high level of professionalism and commitment to quality work as part of this contract.

CJ Concrete Construction’s history of performing quality work for the City dates back to 2010 and includes an Omnibus project (Project 10-6716), the Thornton Park Water Main Improvements project (Project 15-6448), and most recently, in 2022, on-going sidewalk improvements in City neighborhoods.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER2021-99 was filed for the project.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funds in the amount of $1,200,000 were approved and appropriated in FY 2021-22. Of that, $594,210.50 has already been expended leaving a balance of $605,789.50 available for additional concrete improvements.

On January 18, 2022, during the General Fund First Quarter Budget Update presentation, City Council authorized one-time funding of $500,000 for FY 2021-22 to complete additional concrete repair projects and improve service levels for the public. On February 1, 2022, Council approved the first amendment to the construction contract to increase the contract capacity by $1,105,789.50 to utilize the unspent balance and the one-time allocation. Furthermore, on March 1, 2022, during the Mid-Year Budget Update, the City Council authorized an additional one-time appropriation of $2,000,000 for FY 2021-22 from the available Gas Tax fund balance, bringing the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project to $3,700,000 (Exhibit 2).

City Council 16 – 2 5/17/2022
Sidewalk Concrete Repairs Project
May 17, 2022

Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit - Account
No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit -
Account No.

Description
Amount

ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST
2021-22
02917660-
62300
(22-6970)
Special Gas Tax
Roadway
Maintenance,
Contract Services –
Professional
$594,210.50

ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR FIRST AMENDMENT
2021-22
02917660-
62300
(22-6970)
Special Gas Tax
Roadway
Maintenance,
Contract ServicesProfessional
$605,789.50
2021-22
01117626-
62300
(22-6970)
General Fund
PWA SidewalksService
Enhancement,
Contract ServicesProfessional
$500,000.00

ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR THIS ACTION
2021-22
02917660-
62300
(22-6970)
Special Gas Tax
Roadway
Maintenance,
Contract ServicesProfessional
$2,000,000.00
Total $3,700,000.00

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Location Map

2. Cost Analysis
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager
City Council 16 – 3 5/17/2022
PWA

SANTA ANA

PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
Project No. 22-6970:

Omnibus Concrete Repairs
City Council 16 – 4 5/17/2022

COST ANALYSIS
PROJECT NO.22-6970: OMNIBUS CONCRETE REPAIRS

EXPENDITURE

CATEGORY

ORIGINAL
AMOUNT
11/16/2021

ADDITIONAL

FUNDING
2/1/2022

ADDITIONAL

FUNDING
(This Action)

NEW TOTAL
Construction
Contract $360,183.00 $360,183.00
Construction
Administration,
Inspection, Testing
$54,027.50 $50,000 $104,027.50
Contingencies $180,000.00 $1,105,789.50 $1,950,000 $3,235,789.50 Total $594,210.50 $1,105,789.50 $2,000,000 $3,700,000.00 City Council 16 – 5 5/17/2022
Parks, Recreation, and Community Services
www.santa-ana.org/parks
Item # 17
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
May 17, 2022
TOPIC: Amend the Blanket Order Contract for Chain Link Fence Rental/Portable Restroom Rental
AGENDA TITLE:

Amend the Blanket Order Contract for Chain Link Fence Rental/Portable Restroom Rental in the amount of $50,000 (Specification No. 16-059) (General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to amend the annual amount of the blanket order contract with United Site Service, Inc. for citywide chain link fence rentals/portable restroom rentals by $50,000 for a new total annual amount not to exceed $ 285,400, subject to non-substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney.

DISCUSSION
On September 20, 2016, the City Council awarded a two-year contract to United Site Services, Inc., and Quality Fence Co., Inc. with provisions for three one-year renewals, for citywide chain link fence rentals in an annual aggregate amount not to exceed $67,000, which included $7,000 for portable restroom rentals. On July 5, 2017, the City Council approved an amendment for a new total annual amount not to exceed $117,000. On September 3, 2019, the City Council approved an amendment of $97,000, plus a 10-percent contingency, for a new total amount not to exceed $235,400 with two additional one-year renewal options through September 30, 2023.

The contract is used citywide by various departments. In FY 2021-22, due to an increase in park improvement projects, use of these rental services has increased. Currently, the renovation of Santiago Park requires temporary replacement restrooms. Additionally, the renovation of Adams Park restrooms also requires temporary replacement restrooms. Because of the additional need, on top of the department’s regular use, plus future projects, staff recommends an increase in the blanket order contract amount with United Site Services.

Proposed in Fiscal Year 2022-23 is for Park Maintenance Services to transfer from PRCSA to the Public Works Agency (PWA), where they will continue to manage the use of these services, along with the overall maintenance of the parks.

City Council 17 – 1 5/17/2022
Amend the Blanket Order Contract for Chain Link Fence Rental/Portable Restroom Rental
May 17, 2022

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
Transfer of Park Maintenance Services from PRCSA to PWA is pending approval of the FY 2022-2023 City Budget. As such, the current accounting unit number is identified below. Funds will be budgeted and made available in the corresponding PWA accounting unit number when identified and approved:

Fiscal
Year
Accounting UnitAccount #Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account Description
Amount
FY 21-22 01113250-62320 General Fund PRCSA-Park FacilitiesMaintenance & Repair Buildings & Grounds
$50,000
FY 22-23 01113250-62320 General Fund PRCSA-Park FacilitiesMaintenance & Repair Buildings & Grounds
$50,000
FY 23-24 01113250-62320 General Fund PRCSA-Park FacilitiesMaintenance & Repair Buildings & Grounds
$12,500

Submitted By: Lisa Rudloff, Executive Dir. of Parks, Recreation and Community Services
Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager
City Council 17 – 2 5/17/2022
Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 18
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
May 17, 2022
TOPIC: Purchase of Ford Super Duty F-550 Stake Bed Trucks

AGENDA TITLE
Award a Purchase Order to Western Truck Exchange for Two Ford Super Duty F-550 Stake Bed Trucks for the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency in the Amount of $211,278 (Specification No. 22-034) (General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize a one-time purchase and payment of purchase order to Western Truck Exchange for the purchase of two Ford Super Duty F-550 Stake Bed Trucks for the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency in the amount of $211,278 plus a contingency of $20,000, for a total amount not to exceed $231,278, subject to nonsubstantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney.

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency’s Fleet Services Division is responsible for the acquisition, maintenance, repair, and replacement of vehicles, trucks, and maintenance equipment.

The Fleet Services Division seeks to purchase two stake bed trucks for Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency to replace 2002 and 2003 model stake bed trucks used to support the Quality of Life Team.

The Notice Inviting Bids for the trucks was advertised on February 25, 2022, on the City’s online bid management and publication system. A summary of the bid invitation and bids received is as follows:
253 Vendors were notified
28 Santa Ana vendors were notified
10 Vendors downloaded the bid packet
1 Bid received
0 Bids received from Santa Ana vendors
One bid was received from Western Truck Exchange, which is located in Los Angeles, CA. The bid was opened on March 17, 2022, deemed to be responsive to the specifications, and meets the City’s requirements. As such, staff seeks approval of the purchase from Western Truck Exchange.

City Council 18 – 1 5/17/2022
Ford Super Duty F-550 Stake Bed Trucks
May 17, 2022

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with the action.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funds in the amount of $231,278 are available for expenditure in the current Fiscal Year 2021-22 as follows:

Fiscal Year Accounting UnitAccount #
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account Description Amount
2021-2022 01113250-66400 General
Fund
Park Facilities Service
Enhancement,
Machinery &
Equipment
$231,278
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager
City Council 18 – 2 5/17/2022
Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 19
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
May 17, 2022
TOPIC: Purchase of Mini Street Sweeper

AGENDA TITLE
Award a Purchase Order to Bucher Municipal for One Bucher CityCat V20 Mini Street Sweeper to Sweep Bike Lanes, in the Amount of $200,175 (Specification No. 22-066) (General and Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize a one-time purchase and payment of purchase order to Bucher Municipal for the purchase of one Bucher CityCat V20 Mini Street Sweeper to sweep bike lanes in the amount of $185,175, plus a contingency of $15,000, for a total amount not to exceed $200,175, subject to non-substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney.

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency’s Fleet Services Division is responsible for the acquisition, maintenance, repair, and replacement of vehicles, trucks, and maintenance equipment.

The Fleet Services Division seeks to purchase a compact street sweeper (Exhibit 1) for the Maintenance Services Division, which maintains the City’s roadways. Due to the narrow width of bike lanes and other areas within the public right–of–way, a smaller-sized street sweeper is needed to efficiently clean these areas.

Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS-2312 authorizes the City to utilize purchase contracts from any public agency utilizing a competitive bid process to source equipment. Sourcewell awarded a contract to Bucher Municipal (Contract No. 093021-BUC) for Street Sweepers and Specialty Sweepers, with Related Equipment, Accessories, and Supplies as a result of open competitive bidding on behalf of its members, which include government agencies. Utilizing the contract awarded to Bucher Municipal allows the City to make purchases through November 16, 2025, and is in accordance with the City’s existing Purchasing Guidelines.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with the action.

City Council 19 – 1 5/17/2022
Purchase of Mini Street Sweeper
May 17, 2022

FISCAL IMPACT
Funds in the amount of $ 200,175 are available for expenditure in the current Fiscal Year 2021-22 as follows:

Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit-Account #
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit, Account
Description Amount
2021-22 01117017-66400 General
Fund
PWA – Service
Enhancement, Machinery &
Equipment
$150,000
2021-22 06817641-66400 Sanitation
Fund
Public Works-Roadway
Cleaning, Machinery &
Equipment
$50,175
Total $200,175

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Images of CityCat V20 Sweeper
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager
City Council 19 – 2 5/17/2022
CITYCAT V20 BUCHER MUNICIPAL
EXHIBIT 1
City Council 19 – 3 5/17/2022
CITYCAT V20 BUCHER MUNICIPAL
Watch the CityCat V20 Sweeper in Action
Video Link
City Council 19 – 4 5/17/2022
Parks, Recreation, and Community Services
www.santa-ana.org/parks
Item # 20
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
May 17, 2022
TOPIC: Santa Ana Stadium Scoreboard and Sound System Replacement, Marquee Retrofit, and Appropriation Adjustment
AGENDA TITLE:

Approve Appropriation Adjustment and Award a Purchase Order to Daktronics, Inc. for the Purchase of a Scoreboard and Sound System Replacement and Marquee Retrofit in an Amount Not to Exceed $705,761 (Project No. 22-2753 and 22-1306) (Non-General Fund and Revive Santa Ana Program)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Approve an Appropriation Adjustment recognizing revenue received in Fiscal Year 2021-22 in the amount of $358,599 in the Residential Development District 2, District Park Acquisition & Development Fees revenue account and appropriating the same amount into the Residential Development District 2, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account for FY 2021-2022 capital operating expenses. (Requires five affirmative votes)

2. Award a one-time purchase order to the Daktronics, Inc. for the purchase of a scoreboard and sound system replacement and marquee retrofit at the Santa Ana Stadium in an amount not to exceed $705,761, subject to non-substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney.

3. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program to modify the New Stadium Scoreboard and Marquee Projects.

DISCUSSION
The Santa Ana Stadium at Eddie West Field scoreboard is over ten years old and has become difficult to maintain. Most components are now obsolete and the next failure could result in an inoperable system during a game.

Replacement of the equipment will modernize the system and implement the latest technology that is easily maintainable and conforms to today’s standards.

Additionally, the City operates an electronic informational marquee, located on the corner of Flower Street and Civic Center Drive. The primary purpose of the Santa Ana Stadium City Council 20 – 1 5/17/2022
Santa Ana Stadium Scoreboard and Sound System Replacement, Marquee Retrofit, and Appropriation Adjustment
May 17, 2022

marquee is to provide the outside community with information on City programs, events and activities occurring throughout the City of Santa Ana. The internal components of this equipment have also become obsolete and require retrofitting. The marquee retrofit will utilize Revive Santa Ana funds identified for Expansion of Critical City Communication Methods.

Santa Ana City Ordinance No. NS-2312 authorizes the City to purchase against contracts from any public agency utilizing a competitive bid process. Region 4 Education Service Center entered into Contract No. R170101 with Daktronics, Inc., for Products and Services through an Omnia Cooperative Agreement; allowing public agencies access to discounted pricing. The City intends to “piggy-back” from the established procurement in order to replace the scoreboard and retrofit the marquee.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost of the scoreboard project, including the contract, project management and contingency is $616,708. The Capital Improvement Program identified $200,000 for the Scoreboard and Marquee Projects. An additional $58,109 is available for this project in the FY 2021-22 budget. Therefore $258,109 has been established for the scoreboard project. An appropriation adjustment is required to recognize revenue received in Fiscal Year 21-22 in the amount of $358,599 in the Residential Development District 2, District Park Acquisition & Development Fees revenue account (31213002-53300) and appropriating the same amount into the Residential Development District 2, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (31213260-66220) for FY 2021- 2022 capital operating expenses.

After the appropriation adjustment, funds will be available in the following accounts for the scoreboard project:

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit -
Account No. Fund Description
Accounting Unit -
Account No.

Description
Amount
2021-22 31213260-66220
(22-2753)
Residential
Development
(District 2)
Acquisition &
DevelopmentImprovements Other
Than Building
$562,708
2021-22 31213261-66220
(22-2753)
Residential
Development
(District 2)
Acquisition &
Development In LieuImprovements Other
Than Building
$54,000
Funds are budgeted and available in the following account for the marquee retrofit:

City Council 20 – 2 5/17/2022
Santa Ana Stadium Scoreboard and Sound System Replacement, Marquee Retrofit, and Appropriation Adjustment
May 17, 2022

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit -
Account No. Fund Description
Accounting Unit -
Account No.

Description
Amount
2021-22 18103013-66220
(22-1306)
American Rescue
Plan Act (ARPA)
ARPA-CMOImprovements Other
Than Building
$172,395

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Quote:1-Scoreboard

2. Quote:2-Marquee

3. Cost Analysis

4. CIP Worksheet
Submitted By: Lisa Rudloff, Executive Dir. of Parks, Recreation and Community Services
Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager
City Council 20 – 3 5/17/2022
DAKTRONICS.COM
201 Daktronics Drive PO Box 5128
Brookings, South Dakota 57006-5128
T 800-325-8766 605-692-0200 F 605-697-4700
Thank you for choosing Daktronics.

The following items are required to process your order:
 Please verify that this equipment fulfills your project needs  Signed Quote
 Validate and complete Project Site Information page, return with order Help ensure Daktronics shipping, invoicing, and service locations are accurate.  Payment & Invoicing – Please provide 30% down payment. Contact your sales team for payment options. Invoice available by request.
 Tax Status – Applicable taxes included - subject to change You may submit your order to your sales team via the following methods.

Email: Mail:

Attention: Daktronics, Inc
Robin Hall – [email protected] Attn: Gary Delaney Gary Delaney – [email protected] PO Box 5128
Brookings, SD 57006
After your order has been placed:
 Freight Unloading Guidelines – Shipping to site via Independent Carrier (flatbed trailer).

Crane or telehandler required for unloading.
 Logos, Graphics or Sponsor Advertisements – vector files must be submitted with your order documents, not to exceed 1 week of order placement. Once artwork is received, you will be sent a final layout requesting your approval before production. If artwork is not received, the panels will be painted the same as scoreboard and shipped blank.

Exhibit 1
City Council 20 – 4 5/17/2022
20/Apr/2022
Quote valid for: 60 days
Terms: 30% with the order, 60% Payment
before shipment, 10% Net 30 days from
shipment
Subject to Credit Review
FCA: DESTINATION
Delivery: Call for Production Time
City of Santa Ana
Accounts Payable
PO BOX 1988
SANTA ANA , CA USA 92702
Phone: 714-647-5804
Fax:

Email:

Reference: Santa Ana Stadium.

Omnia Partners Contract #R170101±Certified Proposal Number #CA-R170101-315028 Item
No.

Model Description Qty Price
1 LVX-2860-396X720-10SMDMR-LT-25, 13.2' x 0.5' Side
Borders
Daktronics Live Video Display 1 $493,365.90
Matrix:

Line Spacing:

LED Color:

Cabinet Dimensions:

Max Power:

Weight:
396 lines by 720 columns
10mm
RGB- - 281 Trillion Colors
13' 3" H X 25' 0" W X 0' 11" D
(Approx. Dimensions)
21195 watts/display
Unpackaged 3260 lbs per
display; Packaged 3985 lbs
per display
Technician - 1900 2
Control-1 video input
(Primary/Backup Player &
Processor) w/ Laptop
Standard Definition or High Definition (1080p); 1
video input
1 Standard Video All Sport®
RTD Input Kit
Displays Game-In-Progress Information 1
W-1490 Fiber Optic Cable; 50 µm Multimode; 12 Fiber with non-terminated ends
1000
Daktronics System Installation
Drawings >100
Attachment support system drawings 1
Daktronics System Electrical
Drawings >100
Power and control system drawings 1
Daktronics System Certified
Structural Drawings >100
Engineered stamped drawings for footing and
beams
1 System Startup Final Commissioning of Equipment 1
FB-2021-W-PV-F PanaView® Football Scoreboard; Scoreboard Color: __________; Caption Color: __________
1 Cabinet Dimensions:

Digit Type:

Digit Color:

Max Power:

Weight:
8' 0" H X 25' 0" W X 0' 8" D
(Approx. Dimensions)

PANAVIEW
WHITE
705 watts/display
Unpackaged 785 lbs per
display; Packaged 1250 lbs
per display
AS-5010 Kit All Sport® 5010 Control Console Kit 1
Quote # 622653-2 Rev 2

Daktronics, Inc.
201 Daktronics Drive
Brookings, SD 57006 USA
www.daktronics.com
DAKTRONICS QUOTE # 622653-2-2
Exhibit 1
City Council 20 – 5 5/17/2022
Outdoor Scoreboard Wire
Communication
Communication Type: Wire (Cable not included) 1
TNMC_8x48_White LED
(34mm)
8x48-34mm LED Team Name Message Center;
Set of 2; White LED's
1 Digit Color:

Weight:

WHITE
Unpackaged 120 lbs per
display; Packaged 250 lbs per
display
Stripe; 0A-1407-0045 / 0A1647-0078Perimeter Border Stripe for FB-2021 Scoreboards; Color:_______
1 120VAC Trumpet Horn #55 For Outdoor Scoreboards 1
18" PanaView Time Outs Left
Option (White LEDs)
For FB-2021 Scoreboards 1
TI-2003-W-PV for Delay of
Game
Outdoor PanaView® Delay of Game Timer; Set of
2; Scoreboard Color: __________
1 Cabinet Dimensions:

Digit Type:

Digit Color:

Max Power:

Weight:
3' 0" H X 4' 0" W X 0' 8" D
(Approx. Dimensions)

PANAVIEW
WHITE
95 watts/display
Unpackaged 65 lbs per
display; Packaged 120 lbs per
display
Outdoor Scoreboard Wire
Communication
Communication Type: Wire (Cable not included) 2
I-Beam Mounting Method (A) For 2 I-Beams 1
SS1500HD Sportsound 1500HD Sound Cabinet *BLACK*,
Mesh Color: _____________
1 SSR-200-NW Sportsound Rack 200 that includes: 12Ch Audio Mixer, CD Player, Operator Accessories Case.
1 Wireless Microphone
Handheld Package
Wireless microphone handheld package includes:
wireless receiver, handheld transmitter w/ SM58
mic, power supply, 1/2 wave antennas, rack
mount kit, zippered accessory bag, and AA
alkaline batteries
1 Wireless Microphone
Handheld Package
Wireless microphone handheld package includes:
wireless receiver, handheld transmitter w/ SM58
mic, power supply, 1/2 wave antennas, rack
mount kit, zippered accessory bag, and AA
alkaline batteries
1 Wireless Bodypack
Microphone System -
Referees
Wireless Bodypack Microphone System for
Referees. Includes: Receiver, Bodypack
Transmitter with Black Pouch, Shure MX150B/OTQG Lavalier Microphone with Clip, Windscreen, Case, Headworn Microphone, Antenna Combiner
Kit for Dual Wireless Systems, and Daktronics InLine Referee Mute Switch. 1 SSR-AM Sportsound Announcers Mixer, 2Ch Tabletop,
Microphone and MP3 Inputs, Includes Single-Muff
Headset, 1/8"to1/8" stereo cable, and XLR output
cable. Power Supply Included.
1 Quote # 622653-2 Rev 2

Daktronics, Inc.
201 Daktronics Drive
Brookings, SD 57006 USA
www.daktronics.com
DAKTRONICS QUOTE # 622653-2-2
Exhibit 1
City Council 20 – 6 5/17/2022
Fiber Conversion Box w/
Analog Backup
Fiber conversion box converts the analog audio
signal from the source equipment into fiber optic
signal to the sound system. Box includes analog
backup switch.
1 W-1627 Microphone Cable, XLR M to XLR F, 5' 1
W-1615 Cable, Audio Signal, 1 pair shielded 22 AWG,
1000' spool
1000
Spare Parts Kit; SS1500HD Spare Parts Kit for Sportsound 1500HD system.

Includes (1) Amplifier, (2) LF Speakers, (2) MF
Speakers, (2) HF Speakers
1 Backup Referee Bodypack
Kit, Shure QLXD System
Shure QLXD Bodypack Transmitter with Black
Pouch , Shure WL185-TQG Lavalier Microphone
with Clip, Windscreen, and Case, Headworn
Microphone, and Daktronics In-Line Referee Mute
Switch.
1 Backup Handheld
Transmitter, Shure - QLXD2
Wireless Handheld Microphone , Transmitter w/
SM58 Microphone, Shure-QLXD2/SM58
1 Labor; Field Technician,
Audio System
Regional Field Service Technician Labor which
includes final termination of audio cables, audio
system commissioning, and customer operation
training
1 Speaker Mesh Panel; 6'-0" x
25'-0"
Speaker Mesh Panel / ID Panel to cover the
SS1500HD - Background color: Red# 50317
1 Weight: Packaged 300 lbs per display
Speaker Mesh Only; 6'-0" x
25'-0"
Replacement mesh for the Speaker Mesh Panel /
ID Panel
1 Weight: Packaged 175 lbs per display
FREIGHT Shipping to site via Independent Carrier (flatbed trailer). Crane or telehandler required for
unloading.
1 Physical Installation See attachment A. 1
Taxes Subject to change 1
2 Contingency Fee Contingency amount is intended to cover any authorized change order in accordance with
the terms and conditions.
1 $40,000.00
Services
3 Warranty & Services 1
M5M5 - 5 Years Platinum
Plus Extended Service for
622653-2-2 Main Equipment
5 Years of Parts, On-site Labor, and one Annual
Systems Check from Daktronics
1 Standard Video with SCS
One-on-One Webinar Training
1 Custom RTD Frames -- Single
Logo Background
Custom Logo RTD Frames. 1-3 RTD Frames 1
Catalog - FB--Animations
Package
FB--Animations Package (Includes 11 Animations) 1
Quote # 622653-2 Rev 2

Daktronics, Inc.
201 Daktronics Drive
Brookings, SD 57006 USA
www.daktronics.com
DAKTRONICS QUOTE # 622653-2-2
Exhibit 1
City Council 20 – 7 5/17/2022
Team Spirit Vol.1 Animations
Starter Package
Personalized Package - Your School Colors,
Mascot/Logo - 20 Pre-Selected Popular/Essential
Animations Included
1 System Health Plus 5-Year
Subscription with Venus®
Control Suite License Stand
Alone
Access to Venus® Control Suite license, to be
able to use System Health.
1 Total Price Including Applicable Tax: $533,365.90
Please reference listed sales literature: DD1521532 for SS1500HD, DD1552218 for SSR-200-NW, DD1587799 for Catalog - FB--Animations Package, DD1696958 for TNMC_8x48_White LED (34mm), DD1757027 for TI-2003-W-PV for Delay of Game, DD1923154 for Control-1 video input (Primary/Backup Player & Processor) w/ Laptop, DD1936413 for Standard Video All Sport® RTD Input Kit, DD2167297 for FB-2021-W-PV-F, DD2563729 for Custom RTD Frames -- Single Logo Background, DD2631088 for Fiber Conversion Box w/ Analog Backup, DD3638244 for SSR-AM, DD4105001 for LVX-2860-396X720 -10SMD-MR-LT-25, 13.2' x 0.5' Side Borders, SL-03991 for AS-5010 Kit Please reference listed shop drawings: DD2254247 for Fiber Conversion Box w/ Analog Backup, DWG-01098285 for SSR-200-NW, DWG-752494 for SS1500HD
Quote # 622653-2 Rev 2

Daktronics, Inc.
201 Daktronics Drive
Brookings, SD 57006 USA
www.daktronics.com
DAKTRONICS QUOTE # 622653-2-2
Exhibit 1
City Council 20 – 8 5/17/2022
The Terms and Conditions which apply to this order available on request.

SL-02374 Standard Warranty and Limitation of Seller's Liability (www.daktronics.com/terms_conditions/SL-02374.pdf) SL-02375 Standard Terms and Conditions of Sale (www.daktronics.com/terms_conditions/SL-02375.pdf) SL-07862 Software License Agreement (www.daktronics.com/terms_conditions/SL-07862.pdf) Additional Links:

Platinum Plus Scope of Services (www.daktronics.com/Web%20Documents/Services/SL-04704.pdf) System Health (p.widencdn.net/rkg21a/FLYER-System-Healt) The parties acknowledge and agree that the agreement (the ³Agreement´ is comprised of the terms and conditions contained within this quote and any attachments thereto, along with the documents at the website addresses above. Purchaser hereby agrees to purchase the equipment as defined in the Agreement. Purchaser acknowledges having had the opportunity and means to review the Agreement. The Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties and supersede any previous understanding or agreement. The Undersigned has actual authority to execute this document and Daktronics is relying on such authority. Purchaser acknowledges and agrees to the above, as evidenced by its attestation below.

Terms And Conditions:

Leasing Program
If your purchase exceeds $25,000, you may qualify for our leasing program allowing you more flexibility to spread out the cost of your Daktronics display over of a period up to five (5) years. Benefits of our leasing program include fixed rate financing, non-appropriation clause, no prepayment penalty, and customizable payment schedules. Plus, at the end of the lease, the equipment is yours to keep with no additional balloon payments.

Sample payment options as follows:
$50,000 in total equipment cost = $10,700 per year
$100,000 in total equipment cost = $21,199 per year
$250,000 in total equipment cost = $52,899 per year
**Payments based on 5 year/annual payment in advance structure. Leasing is subject to credit approval and agreed upon documentation with Daktronics lending partner. Contact your Daktronics representative for additional options and details.

Unless expressly stated otherwise in this Quote # 622653-2 Rev 2 or the attachments, if Daktronics performs installation of the Equipment, the price quoted does not include the following services pertaining to physical installations: digging of footings (including dirt removal), any materials fabrication, installation of steel cages, rebar, or bolt attachments, or pouring and finishing of concrete footings. Those service may be provided for an additional cost beyond the quoted price. Purchaser shall be fully responsible for any and all additional costs plus overhead in the event anything unexpected of any nature whatsoever is found while digging the footings including but are not limited to rock, water, utility lines, pipes or any other unforeseen circumstance. The Purchaser acknowledges and agrees that it is fully responsible for all site conditions.

Exclusions:
- Electrical Installation
- Structure
- Power
- Engineering Certification
- Labor to Pull Signal Cable
- Electrical Switch Gear or Distribution Equipment
- Physical/Mechanical Installation
- Foundation
- Hoist
- Signal Conduit
- Applicable Permits
- Front End Equipment
If applicable please reference Attachment A for Installation Responsibilities.

Ad/ID Copy Approval Process
Customer shall provide digital artwork for advertising and identification panels, conforming to Robin Hall
PHONE:

FAX: 605-697-4746
EMAIL: [email protected]
Gary Delaney
PHONE: 605-692-0200
FAX: 605-692-0381
EMAIL: [email protected]
Customer Signature Date
Installation Responsibilities:

Acceptance:

Daktronics will create a proof of provided artwork and require approval of that proof three weeks prior to the initial anticipated ship date. Advertising and identification panels not approved in time, will be shipped without copy in Daktronics¶standard finish.

Daktronics¶graphic file standards, at the time of order.

Prices and charges are subject to change by Daktronics at any time before the final agreement between the parties is effective. Ship Date will be determined after customer purchase order is received or agreement is signed or otherwise effective, shop drawings are approved (if required) and down payment is received (if required).

Quote # 622653-2 Rev 2

Daktronics, Inc.
201 Daktronics Drive
Brookings, SD 57006 USA
www.daktronics.com
DAKTRONICS QUOTE # 622653-2-2
Exhibit 1
City Council 20 – 9 5/17/2022
Print Name Title
Quote # 622653-2 Rev 2

Daktronics, Inc.
201 Daktronics Drive
Brookings, SD 57006 USA
www.daktronics.com
DAKTRONICS QUOTE # 622653-2-2
Exhibit 1
City Council 20 – 10 5/17/2022
PROJECT SITE INFORMATION – REQUIRED TO PLACE YOUR ORDER

201 Daktronics Drive PO Box 5128 Brookings, SD 57006-5128 800-325-8766 605-692-0200 fax 605-697-4700
www.daktronics.com email [email protected]
This document is for order processing purposes only and is not intended to be part of the Agreement Daktronics Quote # ___________________________
Purchase Order Information: _________________________ _________________________ PO# PO Date
Purchaser (Bill To) herby confirms that the equipment is to be delivered to (Ship To) and may be installed by Purchases or Daktronics, as indicated elsewhere herein, at the address (Installation Location) indicated below unless otherwise specified.

SHIP TO: (delivery location) INSTALLATION LOCATION: (end user) ID#_____________ Company: ________________________________________ Company: ________________________________________ Contact: __________________________________________ Contact: __________________________________________ Street Address: ____________________________________ Street Address: ____________________________________ City: ______________________________________________ City:________________________________________________ State: ______________ Zip: _______________ State:_____________ Zip: _____________ Telephone: ________________________________________ Telephone: _________________________________________ Email: (for shipping notification) Email: (for order acknowledgement) __________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ Additional Email: (for shipping notification) Training Contact & Email: (if applicable) __________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ BILL TO: (receive and pay invoices) ID# _____________
Company: ________________________________________
Contact:__________________________________________
Street Address: ____________________________________
City: ______________________________________________
State: ______________ Zip: _______________
Telephone: _______________________________________
Email: ____________________________________________
***LOGO & AD COPY APPROVAL***
(if applicable)
Name:_____________________________________________
Email: _____________________________________________
**Logos, Graphics, or Sponsor Advertisements**
Vector files must be submitted with your order documents, not to exceed 1 week of order placement. If artwork is no received, the panels will be painted the same as your scoreboard or display and shipped blank.

Exhibit 1
622653-2-2 Per Daktronics PM [email protected] SANTA ANA STADIUM 602 NORTH FLOWER STREET SANTA ANA CA 92703 [email protected] [email protected] City of Santa Ana Accounts Payable PO BOX 1988 SANTA ANA CA 92702 714-647-5804 Hiram Uribe [email protected] City Council 20 – 11 5/17/2022
DAKTRONICS QUOTE # 622653-2-2 MAIN

ATTACHMENT A
General
1) Secure necessary sign permits, as required.
2) Customer is responsible to ensure the existing structure/building is adequate, including any necessary modifications, for the installation of the Equipment, including but not limited to (i) obtaining certified engineer drawings to the extent required by law and (ii) providing Daktronics, upon reasonable request, documentation relating to the existing structure and modifications necessary for Daktronics perform its work. 3) Mark location of the new Equipment as delineated in the quote. 4) Remove or cut back any trees or other plants to allow access to the rear of the scoreboard structure from W Civic Center Drive.
5) Clarification for item 2 above: Daktronics has copies of stamped drawings for the current product. We do not foresee any issues with replacing the existing displays with the proposed displays. We are not aware of any changes to the existing structure compared to the stamped drawings - in the event there has been changes, Daktronics will not be responsible for any structure modifications that deviate from the stamped drawings.

Structures
1) Not applicable
Electrical & Data
1) Provide and install signal cable conduit, with pull string, from control location to each outdoor Equipment location to five (5) feet off grade on structure.
2) Existing electrical and signal conduits currently in place are expected to be reused.

Product/Equipment
1) Provide storage of all Equipment and control equipment in a safe, dry, and secure location until installation. 2) Provide high speed internet connection to control room equipment. 3) Required power outlets on clean dedicated circuit(s) for all control equipment. 4) Existing high speed internet and power to control equipment can be reused for the new equipment.

General
1) Secure necessary construction permits, as required.
2) Removal and disposal of existing equipment.
3) Provide all landscaping, track, sidewalk and path protection along with site restoration, and/or sprinkler system repair work.
4) Removal and disposal of existing audio pole.

Structures
1) Steel fabrication and erection of sub-structure for Equipment mounting. 2) Paint new support structure provided in this quotation. 3) Paint existing support structure.
4) Certify existing structure for new equipment.

Electrical & Data
1) Provide primary power feed five (5) feet off grade on structure in the form of transformer and electrical disconnect/distribution panel, as applicable, with over current protection per all applicable electrical codes and regulations.
2) Provide secondary power conduits, power cable and power hook-up from five (5) feet off grade on structure to all Daktronics supplied load centers/termination panel at/within the Equipment. 3) Provide and install signal cable conduit, with pull string, from five (5) feet off grade on structure to each outdoor Equipment signal termination point.
4) Labor to pull all new signal cable (and remove existing cable, if required). 5) Existing electrical conductors from electrical room to base of the scoreboard structure will be reused. Two (2) new transformers will be provided and installed by Daktronics to properly energize the new equipment. A new distribution panel at base of the scoreboard structure will also be provided and installed.

Product/Equipment

CUSTOMER RESPONSIBILITIES

DAKTRONICS RESPONSIBILITIES
Attachment A Page 1 of 2
Exhibit 1
City Council 20 – 12 5/17/2022
DAKTRONICS QUOTE # 622653-2-2 MAIN

ATTACHMENT A
1) Accept, lift, unload, and inspect all Equipment and control equipment from carrier. 2) Lift and mount Equipment listed in this quotation.
1) Access: Daktronics requires unobstructed access to Equipment and control room installation site until display is 100%. Installation equipment (cranes, lifts, trucks, concrete trucks, etc.) are expected to have access directly to the scoreboard/structure location. No concrete pumping, concrete buggies, or crane picks over 10' distance from scoreboard structure are included.
2) Control Room Climate: Normal operating temperature should be between 40° to 90° Fahrenheit (4° to 32° Celsius). Normal operating humidity should be less than 80% non-condensing. Storage temperature should be between -10° to 105° Fahrenheit (-23° to 41° Celsius). Storage humidity should be less than 95% noncondensing. Keep computers and monitors out of direct sunlight during storage. Allow control equipment taken out of storage to return to operating temperature range prior to turning it on (24 hours recommended). 3) Electrical: The maximum voltage is 120 volts line to neutral for all Equipment in this quotation. 4) Building Penetrations: Customer to provide all required building (wall/roof) penetrations for the installation of Daktronics provided wireless bridge and/or scoring console radio transmitter components at the control location. Mount Daktronics provided wireless bridge and/or scoring console radio transmitter components to the building in accordance with manufacturers recommendations. Building penetration location shall provide clear line-of-sight to the Equipment. Provide all conduit, with pull string, from control location equipment to the building penetration location.
5) Existing Conduit: Costs to repair or replace damaged or obstructed conduit have not been included in this quote.
6) Prevailing Wage: The install price accounts for prevailing wages.

QUALIFICATIONS/CLARIFICATIONS
Attachment A Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 1
City Council 20 – 13 5/17/2022
DAKTRONICS.COM
201 Daktronics Drive PO Box 5128
Brookings, South Dakota 57006-5128
T 800-325-8766 605-692-0200 F 605-697-4700
Thank you for choosing Daktronics.

The following items are required to process your order:
 Please verify that this equipment fulfills your project needs  Signed Quote
 Validate and complete Project Site Information page, return with order Help ensure Daktronics shipping, invoicing, and service locations are accurate.  Payment & Invoicing – Please provide 30% down payment. Contact your sales team for payment options. Invoice available by request.
 Tax Status – Applicable taxes included - subject to change You may submit your order to your sales team via the following methods.

Email: Mail:

Attention: Daktronics, Inc
Robin Hall – [email protected] Attn: Gary Delaney Gary Delaney – [email protected] PO Box 5128
Brookings, SD 57006
After your order has been placed:
 Freight Unloading Guidelines – Shipping to site via LTL (enclosed trailer). Usually unloads at a dock. Forklift or pallet jack may be required.

Exhibit 2
City Council 20 – 14 5/17/2022
18/Apr/2022
Quote valid for: 120 days
Terms: 30% with the order, 60% Payment
before shipment, 10% Net 30 days from
shipment
Subject to Credit Review
FCA: DESTINATION
Delivery: Call for Production Time
City of Santa Ana

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
PO BOX 1988
SANTA ANA, CA USA 92702
Phone: (714)647-5804
Fax:

Email:

Reference: Santa Ana Stadium - Marquee Retrofit. Omnia Partners Contract #R170101 ±Certified Proposal Number #CA-R170101 -314969
Item
No.

Model Description Qty Price
1 GT6x-240X600-6-RGB-2V Galaxy® Outdoor Electronic Message Center - GT6x Series - 6mm RGB; 2V Interconnect
Cable Length Is 20 Feet
1 $152,395.07
Matrix:

Line Spacing:

LED Color:

Face Configuration:

View Angle:

Cabinet Dimensions:

Max Power:

Weight:
240 lines by 600 columns
6mm
RGB- 281 Trillion Colors
2V - two one sided displays -
same content
140 degrees Horizontal x 70
degrees Vertical
5' 4" H X 12' 3" W X 0' 7" D
(Approx. Dimensions)
3950 watts/display
Unpackaged 605 lbs per
display; Packaged 770 lbs per
display
Custom Paint Custom Paint Selected From A 150 Color Pallet - Red #50317
1 Daktronics Verizon Modem,
4G, Ethernet
Daktronics Verizon 4G Cellular Modem Only -
Requires Daktronics Verizon Cellular Data Plan
1 GT6x/VT6x RGB 6mm Spare
Parts - Eight Module Package
Includes Eight (8) Modules and Sata Cables, and
(2) Power Supplies
1 Physical Installation See attachment A. 1
Daktronics System Certified
Structural Drawings >100
Engineered stamped drawings for footing and
beams
1 System Startup Final Commissioning of Equipment 1
FREIGHT Shipping to site via LTL (enclosed trailer). Usually unloads at a dock. Forklift or pallet jack may be
required.
1 Taxes Subject to change 1
2 Contingency Fee Contingency amount is intended to cover any authorized change order in accordance with
the terms and conditions. Not included in
taxable amount for current order, applicable
taxes will be applied to authorized change
orders.
1 $20,000.00
Services
3 Warranty and Services 1
Quote # 787401-2 Rev 4

Daktronics, Inc.
201 Daktronics Drive
Brookings, SD 57006 USA
www.daktronics.com
DAKTRONICS QUOTE # 787401-2-4
Exhibit 2
City Council 20 – 15 5/17/2022
M5M5 - 5 Years Platinum
Plus Extended Service for one
GT6x-240X600-6-RGB-2V
5 Years of Parts, On-site Labor, and one Annual
Systems Check from Daktronics
1 Venus® Control Suite Basic
10-Year Subscription
Secure, web-based software that enables display
management anytime, anywhere via internet
connection.
1 Venus® Control Suite
Training Onboarding
Venus® self guided training videos. (English only.) 1
Venus® Control Suite - Oneon-One WebinarCustomized Venus® training in a live, webbased, conference call format using the customer's phone & computer. (English only.)
1 Daktronics Verizon Lifetime
4G Cellular Data Plan for
VCS, 100K-300K Pixels
Daktronics Verizon Lifetime 4G Cellular Data Plan
Per Modem, for Venus Control Suite on Displays
100K-300K pixels. Excludes streaming data feeds
and diagnostics.
1 Total Price Including Applicable Tax: $172,395.07
Please reference listed sales literature: DD3512730 for Daktronics Verizon Modem, 4G, Ethernet Quote # 787401-2 Rev 4

Daktronics, Inc.
201 Daktronics Drive
Brookings, SD 57006 USA
www.daktronics.com
DAKTRONICS QUOTE # 787401-2-4
Exhibit 2
City Council 20 – 16 5/17/2022
The Terms and Conditions which apply to this order available on request.

SL-02374 Standard Warranty and Limitation of Seller's Liability (www.daktronics.com/terms_conditions/SL-02374.pdf) SL-02375 Standard Terms and Conditions of Sale (www.daktronics.com/terms_conditions/SL-02375.pdf) SL-07862 Software License Agreement (www.daktronics.com/terms_conditions/SL-07862.pdf) Additional Links:

Platinum Plus Scope of Services (www.daktronics.com/Web%20Documents/Services/SL-04704.pdf) Wireless Service Addendum (www.daktronics.com/TermsConditions/DD3956286) The parties acknowledge and agree that the agreement (the ³Agreement´ is comprised of the terms and conditions contained within this quote and any attachments thereto, along with the documents at the website addresses above. Purchaser hereby agrees to purchase the equipment as defined in the Agreement. Purchaser acknowledges having had the opportunity and means to review the Agreement. The Agreement represents the entire agreement of the parties and supersede any previous understanding or agreement. The Undersigned has actual authority to execute this document and Daktronics is relying on such authority. Purchaser acknowledges and agrees to the above, as evidenced by its attestation below.

Terms And Conditions:

Leasing Program
If your purchase exceeds $25,000, you may qualify for our leasing program allowing you more flexibility to spread out the cost of your Daktronics display over of a period up to five (5) years. Benefits of our leasing program include fixed rate financing, non-appropriation clause, no prepayment penalty, and customizable payment schedules. Plus, at the end of the lease, the equipment is yours to keep with no additional balloon payments.

Sample payment options as follows:
$50,000 in total equipment cost = $10,700 per year
$100,000 in total equipment cost = $21,199 per year
$250,000 in total equipment cost = $52,899 per year
**Payments based on 5 year/annual payment in advance structure. Leasing is subject to credit approval and agreed upon documentation with Daktronics lending partner. Contact your Daktronics representative for additional options and details.

Unless expressly stated otherwise in this Quote # 787401-2 Rev 4 or the attachments, if Daktronics performs installation of the Equipment, the price quoted does not include the following services pertaining to physical installations: digging of footings (including dirt removal), any materials fabrication, installation of steel cages, rebar, or bolt attachments, or pouring and finishing of concrete footings. Those service may be provided for an additional cost beyond the quoted price. Purchaser shall be fully responsible for any and all additional costs plus overhead in the event anything unexpected of any nature whatsoever is found while digging the footings including but are not limited to rock, water, utility lines, pipes or any other unforeseen circumstance. The Purchaser acknowledges and agrees that it is fully responsible for all site conditions.

Exclusions:
- Foundation
- Hoist
- Labor to Pull Signal Cable
- Electrical Switch Gear or Distribution Equipment
- Power
- Signal Conduit
- Applicable Permits
- Front End Equipment
If applicable please reference Attachment A for Installation Responsibilities.

Ad/ID Copy Approval Process
Customer shall provide digital artwork for advertising and identification panels, conforming to Robin Hall
PHONE:

FAX: 605-697-4746
EMAIL: [email protected]
Jeffrey Johnson
PHONE:

FAX: 605-697-4700
EMAIL: [email protected]
Customer Signature Date
Print Name Title
Installation Responsibilities:

Acceptance:

Daktronics will create a proof of provided artwork and require approval of that proof three weeks prior to the initial anticipated ship date. Advertising and identification panels not approved in time, will be shipped without copy in Daktronics¶standard finish.

Daktronics¶graphic file standards, at the time of order.

Prices and charges are subject to change by Daktronics at any time before the final agreement between the parties is effective. Ship Date will be determined after customer purchase order is received or agreement is signed or otherwise effective, shop drawings are approved (if required) and down payment is received (if required).

Quote # 787401-2 Rev 4

Daktronics, Inc.
201 Daktronics Drive
Brookings, SD 57006 USA
www.daktronics.com
DAKTRONICS QUOTE # 787401-2-4
Exhibit 2
City Council 20 – 17 5/17/2022
PROJECT SITE INFORMATION – REQUIRED TO PLACE YOUR ORDER

201 Daktronics Drive PO Box 5128 Brookings, SD 57006-5128 800-325-8766 605-692-0200 fax 605-697-4700
www.daktronics.com email [email protected]
This document is for order processing purposes only and is not intended to be part of the Agreement Daktronics Quote # ___________________________
Purchase Order Information: _________________________ _________________________ PO# PO Date
Purchaser (Bill To) herby confirms that the equipment is to be delivered to (Ship To) and may be installed by Purchases or Daktronics, as indicated elsewhere herein, at the address (Installation Location) indicated below unless otherwise specified.

SHIP TO: (delivery location) INSTALLATION LOCATION: (end user) ID#_____________ Company: ________________________________________ Company: ________________________________________ Contact:__________________________________________ Contact: __________________________________________ Street Address: ____________________________________ Street Address: ____________________________________ City: ______________________________________________ City:_______________________________________________ State: ______________ Zip: _______________ State: ____________ Zip: _____________ Telephone:________________________________________ Telephone: ________________________________________ Email: (for shipping notification) Email: (for order acknowledgement) __________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ Additional Email: (for shipping notification) Training Contact & Email: (if applicable) __________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ BILL TO: (receive and pay invoices) ID# _____________ ***VENUS SOFTWARE INFORMATION*** Company: ________________________________________ This is a new Venus account (Daktronics will create and send the credentials)
Contact:__________________________________________ Display Name: __________________________________________ Street Address: ____________________________________ Please add users and display to existing Venus account City: ______________________________________________ Acct Name or Number: __________________________________ State: ______________ Zip: _______________ Venus Control Suite Software package:

Telephone:________________________________________ Software package:

Email:_____________________________________________ Animation Allowed: YES NO Width Height Color
Primary Contact – Account Administrator
*Email: __________________________________________________ ***LOGO & AD COPY APPROVAL*** Name: __________________________________________________ (if applicable) Phone:__________________________________________________ Name: ____________________________________________ Secondary Contact – Account Administrator Email: ____________________________________________ *Email: __________________________________________________ Name: __________________________________________________ Phone:__________________________________________________ IF APPLICABLE Duration (in years):

System Health: Plus Advanced Premier
**Logos, Graphics, or Sponsor Advertisements**
Vector files must be submitted with your order documents, not to exceed 1 week of order placement. If artwork is no received, the panels will be painted the same as your scoreboard or display and shipped blank.

Exhibit 2
787401-2-3 Per Daktronics PM CA [email protected] SANTA ANA STADIUM 602 NORTH FLOWER STREET SANTA ANA CA 92703 [email protected] City of Santa Ana Accounts Payable PO BOX 1988 SANTA ANA CA 92702 714-647-5804 Select, 10 years 600 240 RGB nana City Council 20 – 18 5/17/2022
DAKTRONICS QUOTE # 787401-2-4 MAIN

ATTACHMENT A
General
1) Secure necessary sign permits, as required.
2) Customer is responsible to ensure the existing structure/building is adequate, including any necessary modifications, for the installation of the Equipment, including but not limited to (i) obtaining certified engineer drawings to the extent required by law and (ii) providing Daktronics, upon reasonable request, documentation relating to the existing structure and modifications necessary for Daktronics perform its work. 3) Mark location of the new Equipment as delineated in the quote. 4) Clarification for item 2 above: Daktronics has copies of stamped drawings for the current product. We do not foresee any issues with replacing the existing displays with the proposed displays. We are not aware of any changes to the existing structure compared to the stamped drawings - in the event there has been changes, Daktronics will not be responsible for any structure modifications that deviate from the stamped drawings.

Structures
1) Not applicable
Electrical & Data
1) Provide primary power feed base of structure in the form of transformer and electrical disconnect/distribution panel, as applicable, with over current protection per all applicable electrical codes and regulations. 2) Existing power to marquee structure is expected to be reused. No costs to upgrade or replace conductors have been included.

Product/Equipment
1) Provide storage of all Equipment and control equipment in a safe, dry, and secure location until installation. 2) Provide high speed internet connection to control room equipment. 3) Required power outlets on clean dedicated circuit(s) for all control equipment. 4) Clarification for item 1 above: The message center and accessories will be shipped to the installer's shop until installation will occur. The customer's involvement with storage will be limited to on-site access and staging area during the installation.
5) Clarification for items 2 & 3 above: Any existing internet or control room equipment will not be required for the new displays since they will be controlled by cellular modem that can be operated by devices with internet connections (cell phone, tablets, etc.) by having Venus Control Suite software installed.

General
1) Secure necessary construction permits, as required.
2) Removal and disposal of existing equipment.
3) Provide all landscaping, track, sidewalk and path protection along with site restoration, and/or sprinkler system repair work.

Structures
1) Steel fabrication and erection of sub-structure for Equipment mounting. 2) Paint new support structure provided in this quotation. 3) Paint existing support structure.

Electrical & Data
1) Provide secondary power conduits, power cable and power hook-up from base of structure to all Daktronics supplied load centers/termination panel at/within the Equipment.

Product/Equipment
1) Accept, lift, unload, and inspect all Equipment and control equipment from carrier. 2) Lift and mount Equipment listed in this quotation.
3) Provide and install flashing/trim around sign(s) to eliminate gaps between display faces.

CUSTOMER RESPONSIBILITIES

DAKTRONICS RESPONSIBILITIES

QUALIFICATIONS/CLARIFICATIONS
Attachment A Page 1 of 2
Exhibit 2
City Council 20 – 19 5/17/2022
DAKTRONICS QUOTE # 787401-2-4 MAIN

ATTACHMENT A
1) Access: Daktronics requires unobstructed access to Equipment and control room installation site until display is 100%. Installation equipment (cranes, lifts, trucks, concrete trucks, etc.) are expected to have access directly to the scoreboard/structure location. No concrete pumping, concrete buggies, or crane picks over 10' distance from scoreboard structure are included.
2) Control Room Climate: Normal operating temperature should be between 40° to 90° Fahrenheit (4° to 32° Celsius). Normal operating humidity should be less than 80% non-condensing. Storage temperature should be between -10° to 105° Fahrenheit (-23° to 41° Celsius). Storage humidity should be less than 95% noncondensing. Keep computers and monitors out of direct sunlight during storage. Allow control equipment taken out of storage to return to operating temperature range prior to turning it on (24 hours recommended). 3) Electrical: The maximum voltage is 120 volts line to neutral for all Equipment in this quotation. 4) Prevailing Wage: Install price accounts for prevailing wages.

Attachment A Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 2
City Council 20 – 20 5/17/2022
Project: Scoreboard and Sound System Replacement Total
Contract $493,366
Construction Administration, Inspection, Testing $74,005 Contingencies $49,337
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST $616,708
Project: Marquee Retrofit Total
Contract $152,395
Contingency $20,000
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST $172,395

COST ANALYSIS
Exhibit 3
City Council 20 – 21 5/17/2022
CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 21/22CIP

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Design and construct a new scoreboard and retrofit the Marquee at the Santa Ana Stadium
PROJECT NEED:

The current scoreboard and marquee have past their useful life.

PROJECT TITLE:

New Stadium Scoreboard and
Marquee Retrofit
PROJECT CATEGORY:

City & Park Facility Improvements
Park Facility

LOCATION MAP
AGENCY: DIVISION: CONTACT: DATE:

Parks, Rec. & Community Services Administration Mike Ortiz, Senior Civil Engineer 10-May-2022

PROJECT COSTS
Construction 789,102 - - - - - -
TOTAL 789,102 - - - - - -

SOURCE OF FUNDS
172,395 - - - - - -
562,707 - - - - - -
ARPA (Revive Santa Ana)
A & D District 2
A & D District 2 In-Lieu 54,000 - - - - - -
TOTAL 789,102 - - - - - -
FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 City Council 20 – 22 5/17/2022
Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 21
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
May 17, 2022
TOPIC: Pressure Control Station Relocation and Transmission Main Improvements

AGENDA TITLE
Approve an Appropriation Adjustment and Approve an Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc. for Engineering Services in an Amount not to Exceed $830,000 for up to a Five-Year Term (Project No. 19-6496) (Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc. for engineering services for pressure control station relocation and transmission main improvements for a three-year period beginning May 17, 2022 and expiring May 16, 2025, with provisions for one, two-year renewal period exercisable by the City Manager and City Attorney, in an amount not to exceed of $830,000, subject to nonsubstantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney.

2. Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $270,000 of prior-year fund balance in the Water Fund, Public Works Water Revenue, Prior Year Carryforward revenue account, and appropriate the same amount to the Acquisition & Construction, Water Utility Capital Projects, Water Capital Project expenditure account. (Requires five affirmative votes)

3. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program to include $270,000 in engineering funds for the SA-2 Pressure Control Station Relocation Project (No. 19-6496).

DISCUSSION
The City of Santa Ana’s water system has an average daily demand of 30 million gallons and is composed of approximately 480 miles of water main, 21 groundwater wells, seven pump stations, four pressure-regulating stations, roughly 45,000 service connections, and seven connection points to Metropolitan Water District (MWD).

A connection point (SA-2) to the MWD Orange County Feeder line is currently located in a vault underneath the sidewalk on the south side of West 1st Street, roughly 60 feet east of Bristol Street. The results of a feasibility study indicate the SA-2 connection should be relocated. Accordingly, the Public Works Agency Water Division issued Request for City Council 21 – 1 5/17/2022
Approve an Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc.

May 17, 2022

Proposals (RFP) 21-127 on November 10, 2021 for engineering design services for the preparation of plans, specification, and a cost estimate for the relocation of SA-2 and for transmission main improvements.

The RFP was advertised on the City’s online bid management and publication system with bids due on January 13, 2022. System records indicate 61 vendors were notified and 60 vendors downloaded proposal files. Two proposals were received and evaluated by a selection committee. Based on the criteria as outlined in the RFP, both proposals received were categorized as responsive, and their respective scores are as follows:

FIRM LOCATION PROPOSAL SCORE
Tetra Tech Irvine 92
Psomas Santa Ana 87
The proposal from Tetra Tech Inc. demonstrated high levels of technical competency, experience performing similar services, and contained a clear path toward achieving City goals and objectives. In accordance with the RFP scores, staff recommends entering into an agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc. for engineering services for the SA-2 Pressure Control Station Relocation and Transmission Main Improvements Project (Exhibit 1).

Approval of the amendment to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program will officially incorporate this project into the program (Exhibit 2).

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with the action.

FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of the requested appropriation adjustment in the amount of $270,000 will recognize sufficient funds from Water Fund, Public Works Water Revenue, Prior Year Carryforward revenue account (No. 06017002-50001) and appropriate the same amount to the Acquisition & Construction, Water Utility Capital Projects, Water Capital Project expenditure account (No. 06617647-66301) to complete the funding for the agreement in the amount of $830,000.

The following table summarizes the funds budgeted and approved for project expenditure.

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit
- Account #
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account Description Amount
Prior Authorized Funds
2017-18 06617647-66301
(19-6496) Water
Water Utility Capital
Projects, Water Capital
Project
$100,000
City Council 21 – 2 5/17/2022
Approve an Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc.

May 17, 2022

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit
- Account #
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account Description Amount
2018-19 06617647-66301
(19-6496) Water
Water Utility Capital
Projects, Water Capital
Project
$225,000
2019-20 06617647-66301
(19-6496) Water
Water Utility Capital
Projects, Water Capital
Project
$235,000
Appropriation Adjustment
2021-22 06617647-66301
(19-6496) Water
Water Utility Capital
Projects, Water Capital
Project
$270,000
Total: $830,000
The following table summarizes the funds budgeted and available for expenditure on this agreement by fiscal year.

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit
- Account #
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account Description Amount
Contract (3-Year Term)
2021-22
(MayJune)
06617647-66301
(19-6496) Water
Water Utility Capital
Projects, Water Capital
Project
$30,000
2022-23
(JulyJune)
06617647-66301
(19-6496) Water
Water Utility Capital
Projects, Water Capital
Project
$325,000
2023-24
(JulyJune)
06617647-66301
(19-6496) Water
Water Utility Capital
Projects, Water Capital
Project
$325,000
2024-25
(July-May)
06617647-66301
(19-6496) Water
Water Utility Capital
Projects, Water Capital
Project
$50,000
Optional Two-Year Extension
2024-25
(MayJune)
06617647-66301
(19-6496) Water
Water Utility Capital
Projects, Water Capital
Project
$40,000
2025-26
(JulyJune)
06617647-66301
(19-6496) Water
Water Utility Capital
Projects, Water Capital
Project
$40,000
City Council 21 – 3 5/17/2022
Approve an Agreement with Tetra Tech, Inc.

May 17, 2022

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit
- Account #
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account Description Amount
2026-27
(July-May)
06617647-66301
(19-6496) Water
Water Utility Capital
Projects, Water Capital
Project
$20,000
Total: $830,000

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Agreement with Tetra Tech

2. FY 2021-22 Capital Improvement Program Sheet
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager
City Council 21 – 4 5/17/2022

AGREEMENT WITH TETRA TECH TO PROVIDE ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES

FOR THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this 17th day of May, 2022 by and between Tetra Tech (“Consultant”), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (“City”).

RECITALS
A. On November 10, 2021, the City issued Request for Proposal No. 21-127, by which it sought a qualified consultant to provide engineering design services for the preparation of plans, specification, and cost estimate (P.S.& E.) for a new SA-2 MWD connection, 3,500 feet of transmission main with the possibility of adding approximately 2,900 feet of distribution water main.

B. Consultant represents that Consultant is able and willing to provide such services to the City.

C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting firm in the field.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall perform during the term of this Agreement, the tasks and obligations including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required to fully and adequately complete the services described and set forth in the scope of work that was included in RFP No. 21-127, which is attached as Exhibit A and is incorporated in full, and as further described in Consultant’s Proposal, which is attached as Exhibit B and incorporated in full.

2. COMPENSATION
a. City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services for City, the rates and charges identified in Consultant’s Fee Proposal, which is attached as Exhibit C and incorporated in full. The total amount to be expended under this Agreement shall not exceed Eight Hundred Thirty Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($830,000) during the term of this Agreement, including any extension periods exercised under Section 3. b. Payment by City shall be made within 45 days (forty-five) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals which may reasonably be expected by City.

City Council 21 – 5 5/17/2022

3. TERM
This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above for a three (3) year term with the option for the City to grant up to a two (2)-year renewal, exercisable by a writing by the City Manager and the City Attorney, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 16, below.

4. PREVAILING WAGES
Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the services being performed are part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws.

Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer-employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes.

6. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS
This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk.

City Council 21 – 6 5/17/2022

7. INSURANCE
Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below:
a. Minimum Scope and Limit of Insurance

1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregatelimit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Consultant has no owned autos, hired, (Code 8) and nonowned autos (Code 9), with a limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession, with limit no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate.

5. Broader Coverage: if the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City. b. Other Insurance Provisions

1. Additional Insured Status: The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connectionwith such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if notavailable, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used).

City Council 21 – 7 5/17/2022

2. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this contract, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.

4. Waiver of Subrogation: Consultant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation that any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.

Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiverof subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

5. Self-Insured Retentions: Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require theConsultant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City.

6. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best’srating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.

7. Claims Made Policies (applicable only to professional liability):
i. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.
ii. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.
iii. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work.

City Council 21 – 8 5/17/2022

8. Verification of Coverage: Consultant shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage requiredby this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing allpolicy endorsements to City before work begins.

However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them.

TheCityreservesthe right to require complete, certified copies of allrequired insurance policies,including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.

9. Subcontractors: Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors.

10. Special Risks or Circumstances: City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

8. INDEMNIFICATION
Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Consultant, its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on its behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant’s services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant.

9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION
Consultant shall defend and indemnify the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees City Council 21 – 9 5/17/2022

against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States’ letters patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in the work product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement.

10. RECORDS
Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable.

Consultant shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours.

Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement.

11. CONFIDENTIALITY
If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. “Confidential Information” shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City.

12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE
Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement.

13. NON-DISCRIMINATION
Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Consultant affirms that it is City Council 21 – 10 5/17/2022

an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations.

14. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT
This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Consultant, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail.

This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein.

15. ASSIGNMENT
Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City’s ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other consultants retained by City.

16. TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination.

In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions:
a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product(s) completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement.

17. WAIVER
No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies.

City Council 21 – 11 5/17/2022

18. JURISDICTION - VENUE
This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement.

19. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES
Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement.

20. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney’s fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn.
b. The Agreement is the final and complete agreement and any prior or contemporaneous agreements for similar services between the parties is superseded by this Agreement. This clause shall not apply where the Parties are currently engaged and Consultant is providing services not contemplated by this Agreement.
c. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement.

21. NOTICE
Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons:

To City:

Clerk of the City Council
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988
City Council 21 – 12 5/17/2022

Fax: 714- 647-6956
With courtesy copies to:

Nabil Saba
Executive Director, Public Works Agency
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, California 92702
Fax: 714- 647-5635
To Consultant:

Tom Epperson
Vice President
Tetra Tech
17885 Von Karman, Suite 500
Irvine, CA 92614-5227
Fax: 949-809-5010
A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written.

ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA
Daisy Gomez Kristine Ridge
Clerk of the Council City Manager
[signatures continued on next page]
City Council 21 – 13 5/17/2022
City Council 21 – 14 5/17/2022

EXHIBIT A
City Council 21 – 15 5/17/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA
RFP NO.: 21-127
SA-2 PRESSURE CONTROL STATION RELOCATION AND TRANSMISSION MAIN

IMPROVEMENTS
Appendix
ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK
City Council 21 – 16 5/17/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA
RFP NO.: 21-127
SA-2 PRESSURE CONTROL STATION RELOCATION AND TRANSMISSION MAIN

IMPROVEMENTS

SCOPE OF WORK
Introduction and Background:

The City of Santa Ana is located in the County of Orange in Southern California.

The City encompasses 27.2 square miles and a population over 340,000 people.

The City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency – Water Resources Division oversees and maintains the daily operations of the Water System and Sanitary Sewer System. The City of Santa Ana’s water system has an average day demand of about 30 million gallons (MG) with 45,000 services. It is comprised of approximately 478 miles of water main, 45 MG of storage at five (5) sites, seven (7) Metropolitan Water District (MWD) connections, 21 groundwater wells, seven (7) pump stations, four (4) pressure regulating stations and utilizes two (2) pressure zones.

The existing MWD SA-2 meter vault houses a 12-inch connection from the Metropolitan Water District’s Orange County Feeder line (36-inch water main).

The MWD SA-2 meter vault is currently located underneath the sidewalk on the south side of West 1st Street, roughly 60 feet east of Bristol Street. Once outside of the meter vault, the existing 12-inch pipeline, which is cast iron and constructed in 1943, carries high-pressure water (approximately 170 psi) to an existing Pressure Reducing Station (PRS) located near the southeast corner of the intersection of Flower Street and 1st Street. The water imported from MWD exits the PRS at a lower system pressure and is deposited into Walnut Reservoir and the distribution system. The existing connection normally operates around

8.0 cubic feet per second (cfs) and has a maximum capacity of 15.0 cfs.

The City of Santa Ana is requesting proposals for the purpose of providing engineering design services for the preparation of plans, specification, and cost estimate (P.S.& E.) for a new SA-2 MWD connection, 3,500 feet of transmission main with the possibility of adding approximately 2,900 feet of distribution water main. The proposed pressure control station shall be located on a City owned parcel of land located at 116 South Flower Street or 202 South Flower Street.

The new station shall contain both a pressure reducing valve and a hydro-turbine generator. Power generated by the hydro-turbine generator will need to be conveyed to the Walnut Pump Station Facility by a new proposed electrical conduit. Onsite battery storage will also be required with smart programming to switch from grid power to local power on demand. The high-pressure MWD conveyance pipeline will need to be replaced from the MWD SA-2 meter vault to the proposed location of the new SA-2 pressure control station. The City also desires to attain the highest Envision Rating possible with this project.

A more detailed layout of the proposed location and work shown on the attached feasibility study in Attachment 4 of the Appendix.

City Council 21 – 17 5/17/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA
RFP NO.: 21-127
SA-2 PRESSURE CONTROL STATION RELOCATION AND TRANSMISSION MAIN

IMPROVEMENTS

Description of Work:

The selected firm/s shall provide the City with the following services as described herein.

Task 1. Project Administration and Multi-Agency Coordination

Kick-Off Meeting
Upon receipt of a written Notice to Proceed from the City, the Consultant shall conduct a kickoff meeting with the City Public Works Agency staff to review the Scope of Services, develop an overall Project Schedule and confirm the deliverables. The Project schedule should include each task, milestones, critical path designation and a schedule for progress meetings.

Multi-Agency Coordination
SA-2 is a City of Santa Ana facility and therefore, it is important to coordinate all work with involved agencies to obtain their input and include them in all critical decision making. In addition, the Consultant will be required to coordinate their activities with third party agencies including, but not limited to, utility companies, Metropolitan Water District, Regional Water Quality Control Board, Orange County Water District, the City of Santa Ana Water Resources Division and adjacent property owners. Southern California Edison (SCE) will also be a key player in this endeavor. For the purposes of this RFP, assume up to eight (8) meetings. The Consultant shall be responsible for organization of all meetings including preparation of agendas, meeting minutes and distribution of all documentation to all attending parties or as required.

Coordination with MWD and SCE is vital for the success of this project. The selected consultant shall act as the City’s agent and diligently pursue the City’s goals in a timely fashion. Any unanticipated requests from MWD and SCE shall be evaluated for how they affect the City’s project, schedule and budget.

Task 2. As Built and Utility Research
Consultant shall conduct As-Built and utility research within the Project area.

Consultant shall be responsible for researching all applicable agencies and utility company records. Consultant shall be responsible for preparing a complete list of all underground and overhead utilities in the Project area. Consultant shall work with all underground and overhead utilities in obtaining these companies’ near term (next 5 years) improvement information and schedule. Upon completion of all required research of underground and overhead lines, the consultant shall provide a comprehensive utility and linemap including any planned near term improvements. Consultant shall prepare a complete list of all As-Built/Record Drawings found, what agency they were found in and this information shall be referenced in the Basis of Design and final Plans and Specifications. A topographic and design survey shall be included under this task. A boundary survey for the City selected site shall also be included.

City Council 21 – 18 5/17/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA
RFP NO.: 21-127
SA-2 PRESSURE CONTROL STATION RELOCATION AND TRANSMISSION MAIN

IMPROVEMENTS

The Consultant shall be responsible for developing a potholing location plan and when approved by the City’s Project Manager, will be responsible for managing the required potholing. The City anticipates use of the City’s Contractor for subsurface exploration for the pothole requests. The Consultant shall be responsible for scheduling all potholing with the City’s Contractor a minimum of two (2) weeks in advance of when any potholing will be conducted. The Consultant shall submit all traffic control plans related to potholing activities to City staff for review. The Consultant shall log all potholing information and is responsible for including this information in the Basis of Design and on the Final Design Plans. For the purposes of this RFP, the Consultant shall assume a maximum of twenty (20) potholes will be required. The Consultant will be required to obtain permits and pay all applicable fees for all potholing. Backfill and paving will be as required by the Permitting section of the Public Works Agency. The pavement section shall match the existing pavement thickness at a minimum.

The Consultant shall research all available records at the City, to verify the existing right-of-way for the project area and confirm ownership of the right-ofway. The Consultant shall review the available information and will inform the City of any issues of concern regarding potential problems having to do with prior rights, license agreements, encumbrances, etc.

Task 3. Geotechnical Recommendations
The Consultant shall be responsible for conducting necessary geotechnical testing to determine the existing pavement and base thickness, sub-grade soil type and evaluation of the street structural section’s condition. The Consultant shall perform field and laboratory testing as necessary to recommend pipe bedding requirements, vault house foundation requirements, excavation and shoring requirements, retaining walls as required and a new pavement structural section throughout the Project limits. The Consultant shall perform foundation design analysis, provide earthwork/structural recommendations, pipe bedding requirements, and pavement reconstruction details for the construction of the Project. The Consultant shall also perform a corrosion analysis to assist in pipeline material selection. This information will be included in the Basis of Design, on the Final Design Plans and in the Final Specifications.

The Consultant shall be responsible for preparing traffic control plans for all geotechnical field work and will be responsible for notifying the Project Manager two (2) weeks in advance of any geotechnical field work being conducted. The Consultant shall submit all traffic control plans to City staff for review. The Consultant/Contractor will be required to obtain permits and pay all applicable fees for all geotechnical potholing. Backfill and paving will be as required by the Permitting section of the Public Works Agency. The pavement section shall match the existing pavement section at a minimum.

City Council 21 – 19 5/17/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA
RFP NO.: 21-127
SA-2 PRESSURE CONTROL STATION RELOCATION AND TRANSMISSION MAIN

IMPROVEMENTS

Task 4. Civil Operational Project Design Standard and Criteria The Consultant shall work with City staff to determine the applicable design standards and criteria in addition to those defined by the feasibility study. The Consultant shall consider other possible agency design criteria and/or standards as necessary. A maximum of eight (8) three (3) hour workshop sessions shall be conducted with the Project Manager, City Operations staff and the Consultant design team. The Consultant shall be responsible for organizing the meeting including obtaining background information for discussion, preparing the agenda, compiling meeting minutes and action items, as well as distributing the minutes as required. Elements to be discussed shall include, but not be limited to, operational parameters, ideal control conditions, and operator experience.

Task 5. Basis of Design
Upon completion of Tasks 2 through 4 above, the Consultant shall prepare a Basis of Design Report including elements and findings from all of the Tasks.

The Basis of Design Report shall summarize all of the alternatives and outline the agreed upon alternative including reasons why the alternative was chosen.

The Basis of Design includes 30% drawings of the chosen alternative including all proposed improvements. The Basis of Design Report shall be stamped and signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer. Prior to completion of the final Basis of Design Report, the Consultant shall prepare and submit for review a draft Basis of Design Report to City staff.

The Basis of Design will include, but not be limited to, such issues as:

1. An overall evaluation of the existing SA-2 station based on current design standards. Identify new SA-2 station improvements needed to improve operations, reliability and safety.

2. Make recommendations for SA-2 improvements for the building or service vault as well as related piping. Propose possible building architectural features that can be incorporated into the local neighborhood surroundings and provide concept drawings of the new building.

3. Provide 3D renderings of the proposed building or service vault with key dimensions identified to City staff to assist in evaluations of the station’s operation, maintainability and reparability.

3. The City desires to store energy from the hydro-turbine as well as any solar paneling and use it directly to power the Walnut Pump Station. Provide alternative strategies to achieve this goal and the feasibility of using the City Council 21 – 20 5/17/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA
RFP NO.: 21-127
SA-2 PRESSURE CONTROL STATION RELOCATION AND TRANSMISSION MAIN

IMPROVEMENTS

electric generation in this manner. Provide locations for possible battery storage units as well as size and footprint for said units.

4. Prepare preliminary electrical and control system design plans for hydroturbine generator and related appurtenances. The Consultant shall also evaluate the existing standard operating procedures for the existing pressure reducing station, make recommendations to modify how the station operates at a control system level and SCADA level, and provide preliminary control panel designs in accordance with the City’s panel build guidelines and the description below. This shall also include an electrical operational plan and control scheme.

CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN
The Consultant shall, be required to provide full control panel designs for the hydrogenerator, control valve operations and site operations. Control panel designs shall contain fully engineered diagrams that specify all equipment, backpanels, terminal blocks, special components and related items. Also included in the design shall be all control wiring diagrams, specific I/O, panel elevations, item and quantity lists with specific part numbers. Control system design programmers allowed are as follows:

Enterprise Automation
210 Goddard
Irvine, CA 92618
Scott Pickford – Owner
949-769-6000
KDC Systems
4462 Corporate Center Drive
Los Alamitos, CA 90720
Lukasz Niedojadlo – Project Manager
714-236-2209
Industrial Control Systems Online
P.O. Box 381
Ripon, CA 95366
Steve Scrosati – CEO
209-599-9775
ADDITIONAL RELATED DUTIES THAT MAY BE ASSIGNED:

A. The Consultant will be required to design and develop tagging standards. Tagging should include information both on physical devices, instruments, equipment, PLCs, control cabinets, as well as tagging within the historian and data warehouse.

City Council 21 – 21 5/17/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA
RFP NO.: 21-127
SA-2 PRESSURE CONTROL STATION RELOCATION AND TRANSMISSION MAIN

IMPROVEMENTS

B. The Consultant will be required to create dashboard concept designs and standards. This will include elements that should be provided on an HMI dashboard. The intent is to provide information to benefit operations and provide operator controls as dictated by the City.

C. The Consultant will be required to create, establish and/or maintain PLC programming standards as it relates to operation of the station. Under this duty, the Consultant shall develop application programming templates, subroutines, function blocks and data structures to minimize the level of custom programming required to operable assets to any sites such as pump stations. Standardized templates and modules shall serve as starting points for future programming efforts.

D. The Consultant shall provide an estimate and list for all hardware necessary and proceed, upon City approval, to purchase said hardware, install as necessary and reprogram.

E. The Consultant shall modify the functional specifications for the site and include the following:
a. Narrative overview of the function and operation of the Site; b. Identification of all components of the Site (i.e., equipment, instrumentation, etc.);
c. Narrative description of the functionality of each component of the Site (e.g., tanks, valves, meters, sensors/transmitters, etc.); d. Description of the process control strategy for the Site; e. Narrative description of all operational modes for the Site; f. Narrative description of each process control strategy; g. Identification of the specific I/O, setpoints, commands and communications associated with each strategy;
h. Detailed description of the control logic for each component/strategy, including permissives, interlocks, PID controls, etc.;
i. Description of the SCADA interfaces;
j. Narrative and detailed description of the system alarms and other notification functionality.

F. The Consultant shall develop comprehensive Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) and Site Acceptance Test (SAT) protocols and criteria for the new control panels and related components.

5. Make recommendations for communications between SA-2 and Walnut Pump Station. Propose alternatives for communications in addition to radio communications. Identify all requirements for the options including maintenance and operation related constraints. The City uses an MDS iNET-II radio network for SCADA communications. In the near future, the City may alter the telecommunications scheme. In the event that another radio telemetry network is established, the Consultant shall assist with that work as it pertains to this project. The City may request design assistance for a new radio network and technology options, if deemed in the best interests of the City. Fiber interconnects remain an option.

City Council 21 – 22 5/17/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA
RFP NO.: 21-127
SA-2 PRESSURE CONTROL STATION RELOCATION AND TRANSMISSION MAIN

IMPROVEMENTS

6. Identify all hydraulic conditions to use in conjunction with the City Hydraulic Model to ensure satisfactory operations under normal operating conditions if required. In the event that the pipe discharge line to Walnut Reservoir is used to increase system headloss, material fatigue shall be considered a factor when selecting the pipe line material.

7. It is anticipated that MWD will require a transient analysis of the new pressure control station. The Consultant shall work with MWD to define the analysis criteria, assist the City is coordination with MWD and provide a report that meets MWD’s satisfaction.

8. Prepare preliminary horizontal alignment of water transmission and distribution main upgrades including all utility relocations. Prepare preliminary transmission main pipe bypass drawings showing a bypass into Walnut Reservoir.

9. Prepare site improvements, preliminary horizontal alignment and profile of the lot that will be altered due to the construction and by adding a new security wall at the property.

10. Preparation of a preliminary estimate of probable cost.

11. Preparation of preliminary staging for construction including a traffic management plan and traffic control plans.

12. Outline the preparation and submittal process of all required permits associated with getting the project approved and ready for construction.

This includes estimated time frames for processing said permits.

13. Prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP).

13. Prepare required documents and assist in Environmental approvals.

In the event that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is deemed necessary, the Consultant shall prepare all necessary documentation as required by CEQA. The Consultant shall include an initial study and mitigated negative declaration in their proposal fee. A fee for an EIR shall be an optional item in the event that an EIR is required.

Upon receiving comments from the Project Manager, the Consultant shall incorporate all appropriate and agreed upon comments and submit the final Basis of Design Report. The final submittal of the Basis of Design Report shall include five (5) hard copies and one bound accordingly and one (1) electronic copy and shall be delivered to the Project Manager.

Task 6. 60% Construction Document (PS&E) Submittal
City Council 21 – 23 5/17/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA
RFP NO.: 21-127
SA-2 PRESSURE CONTROL STATION RELOCATION AND TRANSMISSION MAIN

IMPROVEMENTS

The Consultant shall prepare 60% design plans, specifications and estimate of probable costs (PS&E’s) in accordance with the approved criteria as outlined in the Final Basis of Design as prepared in Task 5 above. The 60% PS&E’s shall be prepared using current City Standards, other agency standards where applicable, and good engineering practice. The 60% PS&E’s shall be submitted to the City for review. Other agencies’ review may be required if noted in the Final Basis of Design Report. One (1) hard copies of full size (36x24) plan sets, and one (1) electronic pdf copy of the 50% PS&E’s to the Project Manager. All electronic CAD files must be in the MicroStation v8i format or compatible.

The 60% PS&E submittal should include plans of all disciplines for the proposed storm drain improvements and for the pump station capacity improvements including all civil, mechanical, electrical, geotechnical, structural, and any other design required, overall outline of the specifications with some detail included and an engineer’s estimate of probable costs with preliminary quantities and unit costs. The 60% PS&E submittal shall also include 60% drawings and specifications related to system integration for the City SCADA network.

Task 7. 90% Construction Document (PS&E) Submittal
Utilizing comments received from the various reviewers, the Consultant shall prepare the 100% PS&E’s in accordance with the approved Basis of Design Report as prepared in Task 5. The Consultant shall be required to compile in a matrix format all 60% comments received and responses made by the Consultant for review by the Project Manager. A column in the matrix will outline any action taken by the Consultant in resolving the comment. This spreadsheet will be submitted to all reviewers as part of the 90% PS&E submittal. If needed, the Consultant shall schedule review meetings with key reviewers to clarify any comments and resolve any conflicting comments.

All comments from the 60% review must be addressed and incorporated into the 100% PS&E’s as stated in the response matrix. The 90% PS&E submittal shall include a complete set of improvement plans including all disciplines and all detail sheets. The 90% Specifications/Bid Documents shall be a complete package with all bid items included. The 90% engineer’s estimate of probable costs shall be complete including updated quantities, unit prices, and carried totals for each bid item and a grand total for the Project. One (1) hard copy of full size (36x24) plan sets, one (1) electronic pdf copy of the 90% PS&E’s shall be delivered to the Project Manager.

Task 8. Final Construction Document (PS&E) Submittal
After receiving any comments on the 100% submittal from the various reviewers, the Consultant shall prepare Final PS&E’s ready for bidding. The Consultant shall be required to compile in a matrix format all 100% comments received and responses by the Consultant for review by the Project Manager. A City Council 21 – 24 5/17/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA
RFP NO.: 21-127
SA-2 PRESSURE CONTROL STATION RELOCATION AND TRANSMISSION MAIN

IMPROVEMENTS

column in the matrix will outline any action taken by the Consultant in resolving the comment. This spreadsheet will be submitted to all reviewers prior to and as part of the Final PS&E submittal. If needed, the Consultant shall schedule review meetings with key reviewers to clarify any comments and resolve any conflicting comments.

All comments from the 100% review will be addressed and where required will be incorporated into the Final PS&E’s. The Final PS&E submittal shall include a complete set of improvement plans including all disciplines, all detail sheets and shall be signed by a registered engineer in the State of California for each discipline. The Final Specifications/Bid Documents submittal shall be a complete package with all sections of the standard City bid documents included and will have listed all bid items in the standard form. The Final Engineer’s estimate of Probable Costs shall be complete including final quantities, unit prices, carried totals for each bid item, a grand total for the Project. One (1) hard copies of full size (36x24) plan sets, Two (2) hard copies of half size (11x17) plan sets, one (1) electronic copy of the final PS&E’s shall be delivered to the Project Manager.

The Consultant shall be responsible for addressing any final comments to the plans, specifications and engineer's estimate of probable costs based on input from the Project Manager prior to going to bid.

Task 9. Bidding & Construction Phase Services
Throughout the bidding and construction process, the Consultant shall be required to assist the Project Manager in the following items:
a. Assist in responding to questions raised during the bidding process including preparation of any addenda.
b. Attend the pre-construction meeting and construction kick-off meeting. c. Respond in writing to any contractor’s questions (RFI’s) during construction. Assume a total of twenty-five (25) RFI’s for purposes of this proposal. Assume that ten (10) will require design sketches or exhibits. d. Attend site visits to clarify design issues in the field as required by City staff. Assume a total of twenty (20) hours for site visits and construction meetings.
e. Collect and compile all equipment and product information provided by the Contractor and incorporate into an Operations and Maintenance manual.

The manual will include the specifications, maintenance recommendations and warranty information.

City Council 21 – 25 5/17/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA
RFP NO.: 21-127
SA-2 PRESSURE CONTROL STATION RELOCATION AND TRANSMISSION MAIN

IMPROVEMENTS

g. Evaluate and respond to the Contractor’s requests for change orders.

Assume a maximum of ten (10) requests that will need attention. h. Factory and Site Acceptance Testing of all control equipment. The Consultant shall act as the City’s agent during all acceptance testing. The Consultant shall document and identify all functional and performance discrepancies and coordinate corrective actions to resolve identified discrepancies prior to City acceptance.
i. Review shop drawings, samples, equipment specifications and other submittals. Assume sixty (60) submittal reviews for purposes of this proposal.

The Consultant will review RFI’s and shop drawings during construction when forwarded by the City’s Construction Project Manager. Consultant may be required to visit the construction site to resolve construction issues.

Task 10. As-Built Preparation
Upon receipt and acceptance of the field As-Built construction drawings from the Project Manager, the Consultant shall prepare final As-Built drawings incorporating any changes that occurred during the construction. Field changes shall include all civil, electrical, controls and mechanical disciplines. The Consultant shall submit one (1) full size (36x24) hard copy of the As-Built drawings to the Project Manager along with one (1) electronic copy in MicroStation format. The final As-Built drawings and RFI log shall be stamped and signed by a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California.

Task 11. Commissioning Bid Item
Assist the City with start-up of the facility upon commissioning of the well into operation. Assume a total of eighty (80) hours for the purposes of this proposal.

The Consultant will be tasked with reviewing, enhancing and providing approval recommendations for test protocols and other control system submittals associated with the planned Site improvements to ensure that the panel manufacturer and the City’s integrators deliverables and tasks are being executed in compliance with the accepted specifications.

Task 12. Operations and Maintenance Manual
After construction has been completed and the site has been commissioned, the Consultant shall finalize an operational site manual that fully defines how the site functions. Care shall be taken to address the blending strategies and parameters for SA-2 to remain in operation. In addition, all Operator duties shall be defined and procedures for field checking common errors shall be City Council 21 – 26 5/17/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA
RFP NO.: 21-127
SA-2 PRESSURE CONTROL STATION RELOCATION AND TRANSMISSION MAIN

IMPROVEMENTS

established. The intent of this site manual is to define standard operating procedures for field operations.

Additional Work
The Consultant is encouraged in its proposal to identify any additional work that is not specified in this Scope of Work that would be, in its opinion necessary or of benefit to complete the Project as defined herein. If identified, this Additional Work must be included and separated out in the Consultant’s Proposal and Fee Schedule.

Consultant Responsibilities:

The consultant shall be available to provide all the services stated and detailed hereon.

City Responsibilities:

The City will provide information in its possession relevant to the preparation of the required information in the RFP. The City will provide only the staff assistance and the documentation specifically in referred to herein.  Location Map
 Existing SA-2 As-Built Plans
 Water Main Records Drawings for existing piping for SA-2  Existing Panel Drawings and Control System Standards.  Functional Specifications will be disclosed to the selected consultant.  SA-2 Edison Demand
 Feasibility Study (SA-2)
Fee Proposal:

In addition to Section IV.B.3 (Submittal Requirements: Fee Proposal) fee schedule shall be structured as follows:

City Council 21 – 27 5/17/2022

EXHIBIT B
City Council 21 – 28 5/17/2022
SA-2
Pressure Control
Station Relocation
and Transmission Main
Improvements
RFP No. 21-127
Proposal to Provide
Engineering Design
Services for
January 2022City Council 21 – 29 5/17/2022
17885 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 500, Irvine, CA 92614-5227 Tel 949.809.5000 Fax 949.809.5010 tetratech.com
January 13, 2022
Armando Fernandez, PE, Senior Civil Engineer
City of Santa Ana, Public Works Agency
215 South Center Street
Santa Ana, CA 92703
Reference: Proposal to Provide Engineering Design Services for SA-2 Pressure Control Station Relocation and Transmission Main Improvements – RFP No. 21-127 Dear Mr. Fernandez,
Tetra Tech enthusiastically submits our proposal for the above-mentioned project. The relationship we have built with the City of Santa Ana (City) is highly regarded and we are committed to providing the City with the same consistent, diligent, high-quality service that you expect and deserve. Our project team brings the following distinct advantages:
 Extensive City Experience and Unmatched Knowledge of Project: Members of our project team have completed more than 40 water/wastewater projects for the City since 1999. Our project team knows the City’s design requirements and standards, preferred materials, and operational preferences which will allow us to complete designs in the most cost-effective manner. In addition, Tetra Tech has unmatched knowledge of the project since we prepared the SA-2 Feasibility Study.  Extensive Pipeline Design Experience within Arterial Streets: Tetra Tech has previously designed pipelines within the following City arterial streets: Bristol St., French St., Spurgeon St., Edinger Ave., Ritchey St., and MacArthur Blvd. Tetra Tech has also designed pipeline replacement projects on Katella Ave. (adjacent to Disneyland) and on Newport Blvd.  Extensive PRS Design Experience: Tetra Tech previously designed the SA-7 Relocation and SA-5 Vault Modifications for the City. In addition, Tetra Tech is currently designing the SA-1 Hydrogenerator replacement for the City. Therefore, we have an excellent understanding of the City’s mechanical, electrical and control designs and operation requirements for the PRS facilities.  In-house Environmental, Envision, Survey, WQMP, Traffic Control, Mechanical, Structural, Architectural, Electrical and Control Capabilities: We have our own in-house capabilities for all of the services required for this project except for Geotechnical and Transient Analysis services.  Envision Experience: Tetra Tech previously has obtained or is in the process of pursuing Envision Award rating of Gold on six (6) separate projects in Southern California.  Dedication to City: We believe our past 20 year relationship with the City shows our commitment to providing the City with high-quality service. We have been awarded repeat work with the City due to our quality and responsiveness as well as the trust formed with the City Water Resources staff.

Per Request for Proposal requirements, our proposal shall remain valid for 120 days after the date of submission. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to submit our proposal. Should you require additional information or have any questions, please feel contact me at 949/809-5156 or via email at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Tom Epperson, PE
Vice President
TLE/de
M:\Marketing\Proposals\FY 2021\Santa Ana_SA-2 Pressure Control Station Relocation City Council 21 – 30 5/17/2022
TETRA TECH Page | 1

FIRM AND TEAM EXPERIENCE
Tetra Tech, Inc. is a Delaware Corporation and will provide single-entity responsibility for the work to be performed under the anticipated consultant services contract. Tetra Tech brings to this project an outstanding track record of executing multi-task projects. Staff has been dedicated to this project that have relevant experience specifically with the City of Santa Ana (City) and were selected for their technical backgrounds, experience, and proven ability to meet and exceed expectations and performance goals of our clients.

Company History
Founded in 1966, Tetra Tech is a nationally recognized engineering and resource management firm of more than 21,000 engineers, scientists, construction specialists, and technical support personnel in 450 offices worldwide. Listed on the NASDAQ Exchange (TTEK), Tetra Tech’s annual revenues now exceed $3 billion (2021). Thus, we are in an excellent financial position and can provide the necessary resources to rapidly deploy and meet aggressive project schedules.

Tetra Tech consistently ranks among the top engineering firms annually according to the Engineering News-Record. In 2021, Tetra Tech was ranked 4th among the top 500 design firms nationwide and was ranked #1 in the water service industry for the 18th year in a row! Client-Focused Service
Our goal is to provide the necessary expertise and resources to deliver the project on time, within budget, and in compliance with the design and construction standards set by the City and approval agencies.

Leveraging our national presence, multi-disciplinary team, and client focused service, we apply lessons learned from our vast experience to each and every challenge. Clients benefit from this approach; they receive consistently high-quality service, innovative designs, and functional solutions that are responsive to their needs and often exceed their expectations. We understand that our success is measured by our ability to listen to and collaborate with our clients. A cornerstone of our success is our client-focused service, staff qualifications, firm commitment, and desire to successfully complete each assignment to the satisfaction of all clients. It is our goal to exceed our clients’ expectations through hard work and attention to detail to achieve professional excellence.

This project will be managed and directed from our Irvine office located only 15 minutes from the City of Santa Ana’s office.

Primary Office of Work and Contact Person:
17885 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 500
Irvine, CA 92614-5227
Tom Epperson, PE, Project Manager
Telephone: 949/809-5156
E-Mail: [email protected]
Tetra Tech’s reputation as
a leader in consulting
engineering is validated
by Top 10 ratings annually
by Engineering-News
Record.

City Council 21 – 31 5/17/2022
TETRA TECH Page | 2

PROJECT TEAM
Tetra Tech has assembled a project team that possesses the knowledge, experience, and enthusiasm necessary to successfully complete this project within schedule and under budget, and not only meet, but exceed your expectations. Below is a brief summary of our Project Manager, key design staff and subconsultants. The following pages include our organizational chart of our Project Team and summary table of staff qualifications and experience.

Project Manager
Tom Epperson, PE, will serve the City as Tetra Tech’s Project Manager for this project. Mr. Epperson has more than 41 years of experience in the water field and has been responsible for the design of over 200 miles of water, recycled water and sewer mains. Tom will be the focal point for communications between the City and members of the project team to ensure that the project needs are clearly spelled out and understood. Mr. Epperson will be responsible for achieving the City’s stated goals and ensuring compliance with project intent, completeness of the final deliverables, and satisfaction of the City. Tom has been working with the City since 1983. While his knowledge of the City facilities and working relationship with the City staff started in 1983, Mr. Epperson has been currently supporting the City on the On-Call Engineering Design Services since 2006 and has been involved in over 40 past projects through this contract. Tom has a long personal history of working with the City and is very proud of the repeat service. He believes strongly that repeat work is earned through responsiveness, hard work, and providing a quality product at a reasonable cost.

Key Design Staff
Tetra Tech has assigned a supporting staff that have previously worked on several of the latest projects for the City (i.e., Well 32 Rehabilitation; SA-7 Relocation; Ritchey Water Main Relocation; Water Main Improvements; SA-2 Feasibility Study; and SA-1 Hydro-Generator Replacement). The following are the key staff leaders: Assistant Project Manager, Neha Gajjar, PE; Pressure Reducing Station Facility, Matt Vera, PE; Pipeline, Erin Cabañero, PE; Structural, Eric Yuen, PE, SE; MWD Coordination and Construction Support, Cory Heggtveit, EIT; and Water Quality Management Plan, Nate Schreiner, PE, QSD. Summaries of their education, years of experience, registration, and relevant projects are stated in the staff qualifications and experience table.

Mazen Kassar, PE, will be the Project Manager for Electrical and Controls. Mazen is very familiar with the City’s electrical and control design requirements due to his previous design of Well 32 Rehabilitation, SA-7 Relocation and is current work on the SA-1 Hydro-Generator Replacement. In addition, he will be supported by Enterprise Automation, a recent acquired Tetra Tech Company, that is one of the City’s Control System Design Programmers.

Jason Fussel, PE, a Envision Sustainability Professional, will serve the City as Tetra Tech’s Project Manager for the Envision Certification this project. Jason has successfully been awarded or pursuing Gold Certification on six projects in Southern California.

Subconsultants
In order to provide all of the services required for this project, we have added the following subconsultants to our team: Leighton Consulting, Inc. for Geotechnical Services; and Scott Foster Engineering, Inc. for Transient Analysis. Tetra Tech has worked with both of these subconsultants on various other projects for several years. It should be noted that Scott Foster, PE, of Scott Foster Engineering has performed surge analysis on over 15 different MWD pipelines so he understands the analysis and results that MWD desires.

City Council 21 – 32 5/17/2022
TETRA TECH Page | 3
Tetra Tech has assembled a project team that possesses the knowledge, experience and enthusiasm necessary to successfully complete your project. Our project team is devoted to completing your project within schedule and under budget, while not only meeting, but exceeding your goals.

City Council 21 – 33 5/17/2022
TETRA TECH Page | 4

TETRA TECH SUMMARY OF STAFF EXPERIENCE
Staff Position and
Location Education Years Exp.

California
Registration
Percent
of Time
Pipe Design
(Miles)
No. of PRS
Projects Project
Duty
Tom
Epperson
Project Manager
Irvine Office
B.S.

Environmental
Engineering
41 RCE No. 36399 10% 200 miles
20 PRS
• Crown Valley Pipe Replacement
• Mesa Wells Pipeline
• Mid-Basin Injection Wells/Pipe
• Anaheim Katella and PRS
• All City of Santa Ana Projects
PM
Neha Gajjar Assistant PM
Irvine Office
B.S. Civil
Engineering 29 RCE No. 55574 20% 55 miles6 PRS
• Anaheim PRS
• SA-7 and Ritchey WM Relocation
• SA Water Main Improvements
• SA-1 Hydro-Generator Replacement
Assist.

PM
Matt Vera
PRS
Lead Engineer
Irvine Office
B.S. Civil
Engineering 8 RCE No. 86663 33% 10 miles4 PRS
• Crown Valley ID 1 Master Meter
• Well 32 Rehabilitation
• SA-7 Relocation
• SA-1 Hydro-Generator Replacement
PE
Erin
Cabañero
Pipeline
Lead Engineer
Irvine Office
B.S. Civil
Engineering 11 RCE No. 89704 33% 55 miles5 PRS
• Crown Valley Pipeline Replacement
• Mesa Wells Pipeline
• Mid-Basin Injection Pipelines
• Newport Beach WM Replacements
PE
Cory
Heggtveit
MWD Coord &
Construction
Support
B.S. Civil
Engineering 20 EIT No. 121854 5% 15 miles8 PRS
• SA-7 Relocation
• SA-5 Vault Modifications
• San Lorenzo Construction Support
• SA-1 Hydro-Generator Replacement
DE
Mazen
Kassar
Electrical/
Controls
Manager Irvine
Office
B.S. Electrical
Engineering 29 EE No. 15809 10% 10 PRS
• All City of Santa Ana Projects
• MNWD ID Master Meter
• Mid-Basin Injection Wells
• Anaheim PRS
EE
Eric Yuen
Structural Mgr
San Dimas,
Office
B.S. Civil
Engineering 14 RCE No. 75983SE No. 6177 5% 8 PRS
• All City of Santa Ana Projects
• MNWD ID Master Meter
• Mid-Basin Injection Wells
SE
Nate
Schreiner
WQMP
Lead Engineer
Irvine Office
B.S.

Environmental
Engineering
14 RCE No. 74974 5% --
• Well 32 Rehabilitation
• Mid-Basin Injection Wells
• SA-7 Relocation
PE
Legend: PM – Project Manager; PE – Project Engineer; DE – Design Engineer; EE – Electrical Engineer; SE – Structural Engineer City Council 21 – 34 5/17/2022 TETRA TECH Page | 5

UNDERSTANDING SCOPE OF SERVICES
Background
The existing Metropolitan Water District (MWD) SA-2 meter vault houses a 12-inch connection from the Metropolitan Water District’s Orange County Feeder line (36-inch water main) located within Bristol Street. The MWD SA-2 meter vault is currently located underneath the sidewalk on the south side of West 1st Street, roughly 60 feet east of Bristol Street. Once outside of the meter vault, the existing 12-inch pipeline, which is cast iron and constructed in 1943, carries the high-pressure water (approximately 170 psi) to an existing Pressure Reducing Station (PRS) located near the southeast corner of the intersection of Flower Street and 1st Street. The water imported from MWD exists the PRS at a lower system pressure and is deposited into Walnut Reservoir and the distribution system.

The existing connection normally operates around 8.0 cubic feet per second (cfs) and has a maximum capacity of 15.0 cfs.

The City had a feasibility study prepared by Tetra Tech to evaluate potential sites for the relocation of the SA-2 Facility. The City selected the following possible locations for the SA-2 Facility: a City owned parcels of land located at 116 South Flower Street or 202 South Flower Street. The new station shall contain both a pressure reducing valve and a hydro-turbine generator. Power generated by the hydroturbine generator will be conveyed to the Walnut Pump Station Facility by a new proposed electrical conduit. Onsite battery storage will also be required with smart programming to switch from grid power to local power on demand. The high-pressure MWD conveyance pipeline will need to be replaced from the MWD SA-2 meter vault to the proposed location of the new SA-2 pressure control station, about 3,500 feet of new transmission main. The City is evaluating options for connecting to Walnut Reservoir and the City’s distribution system as a result the City is requesting the possibility of adding approximately 2,900 feet of distribution water main to the project. The City would like all design work to be completed with the intent to enter the Envision Award process.

Approach
We are offering an outstanding team, which combines the experience, depth, and understanding needed for the successful delivery of this project. Our core principles establish how we plan to work together with the City to successfully complete this project:
❖ Service: Tetra Tech puts its clients first. We listen to and better understand our clients’ needs and deliver smart, cost-effective solutions that meet those needs. Our philosophy is to “Do it Right.” ❖ Value: Tetra Tech takes on our clients’ problems as if they were our own. We develop and implement real-world solutions that are cost-effective, efficient, and practical. ❖ Excellence: Tetra Tech brings superior technical capability, disciplined project management, and excellence in safety and quality to all of our work.
❖ Opportunity: Our people are our number one asset. Our workforce is diverse and includes leading experts in our fields. Our entrepreneurial nature and commitment to success provides challenges and opportunities.

We value the relationship that has been established with the City, and look forward to continuing and further developing this association in the future. We are committed to providing the City with the same high-quality service you expect and deserve. Our strength lies in our proven track record that has led to successful completion of multiple projects for the City, as well as other project participants or nearby agencies.

City Council 21 – 35 5/17/2022
TETRA TECH Page | 6

KEY DESIGN ISSUES
Successful implementation of the project will involve resolution of several key design issues. We believe Tetra Tech has an excellent grasp of these issues based on our overall design experience as well as the knowledge we have gained from our previous projects with the City and other nearby agencies.

City Design Experience
Members of our Project Team have completed more than 40 water/wastewater projects for the City since 1999. Our Project Team knows the City’s design requirements, standards, preferred materials, and operational preferences which will allow us to complete the design in the most cost-effective manner. A list of the relevant pipeline and pressure reducing stations that Tetra Tech has completed for the City in the last five (5) years are included in the Relevant Experience Section of our proposal.

In addition, Tetra Tech has a unique understanding of this project since we prepared the SA-2 Feasibility Study for the City.

Pipeline Design
Tetra Tech’s previous experience will assist the City to successfully address the key pipeline issues including: agency requirements; utilities; traffic control; alignment selection; minimize impacts to the surrounding commercial and residential properties; and construction phasing. The proposed pipeline is located within an arterial street, West 1st Street. The following are examples of Tetra Tech’s previous pipeline design within busy arterial streets:
▪ Bristol Street (City’s Well 32 Rehabilitation Pipeline; SA-5 Vault Upgrades; and San Lorenzo Force Main and Gravity Sewers);
▪ French Street and Spurgeon Street (City’s Water Main Improvements); ▪ Edinger Avenue (OCWD’s Mid-Basin Injection Wells);
▪ MacArthur Blvd (Mesa Water’s Well Pipeline);
▪ Crown Valley Parkway (MNWD’s Crown Valley Pipeline Replacements); ▪ Katella Avenue, Disneyland/Conference Center (Anaheim’s Katella WM Project); and ▪ Newport and Balboa Blvds. (Newport Beach’s Water Main Replacement).

Traffic control and the impacts to the surrounding commercial/school/residents access will be a major concern of the City. The traffic control requirements shall be determined with the objective of providing the contractor with adequate room for safety as well as efficient operation while providing the least possible disruption to the traveling public. We believe traffic control is a key design element and will be completed hand-in-hand with the design of the pipeline.

PRS and Hydro-Generator Design
Tetra Tech’s previous experience with the City’s PRS facilities (SA-7 Relocation, SA-5 Vault Upgrade) as well as the SA-1 Hydro-generator replacement will allow us to quickly resolve any design issues and deliver a complete design in the most cost-effective and timely manner. Tetra Tech understands the City’s operational, reliability and safety needs for the PRS and Hydro-generator Facilities due to our previous work for the City on similar facilities.

City Council 21 – 36 5/17/2022
TETRA TECH Page | 7
Vault Design Option
The City is considering placing the relocated SA-2 PRS Facility within a building or within a below ground service vault. Tetra Tech has dealt with this issue on following relevant projects:
▪ For MNWD’s ID 1 Master Meter Relocation, Tetra Tech evaluated several potential locations and at each location looked at within a building, within a wall enclosure and within a below grade vault; ▪ For OCWD’s Mid-Basin Injection Wells, Tetra Tech designed the four well injection facilities within large below grade vault structures.
▪ For IRWD’s Well 78 Replacement, Tetra Tech designed the new well within a below grade vault structure with multi-story apartment structures only 50 feet away from the vault (Warner Avenue and Culver Drive);
▪ For IRWD’s Well ET-2 Replacement, Tetra Tech designed the new well within a below grade vault structure adjacent to a large commercial center (Irvine Center Drive and Culver Drive); and ▪ For the City’s San Lorenzo Lift Station, Tetra Tech designed the new wet well and lift station facility (and corresponding shoring specifications) adjacent to an existing hotel complex and residential development.

Tetra Tech can provide the City with the 3D renderings of the Mid-Basin Injection Well Facilities if the City so desires. Tetra Tech has an excellent understanding of the shoring requirements, noise concerns, and construction restrictions when constructing adjacent to a residential house and across the street from an existing school.

Electrical/Controls
Tetra Tech has an excellent understanding of the City’s electrical and control designs as a result of our previous projects: Well 32 Rehabilitation; SA-7 Relocation; SA-5 Vault Upgrade; and SA-1 HydroGenerator Replacement. In addition, Enterprise Automation, one of the City’s Control System Design Programmers, is now a Tetra Tech company. They will be available to provide valuable assistance and input throughout the design process.

Permitting
SA-2 is a City facility and will need to have the design work coordinated with all involved agencies, including the City’s Building and Public Works. Tetra Tech has an excellent understanding of the City’s permitting requirements due to the following projects:
▪ SA-7 Relocation and Well 32 Rehabilitation Projects (City’s Building and Parks); ▪ Mesa’s Well Pipelines and Well 32 Rehab Pipeline (City’s Public Works); and ▪ OCWD’s Mid-Basin Project (City’s Building, Parks, Fire and Public Works).

Coordination with MWD and SCE is vital for the success of this project. Tetra Tech has been coordinating with MWD for the SA-5 Vault Relocation Project. In addition, Tetra Tech has added Scott Foster Engineering, Inc. to our team to assist with satisfying MWD’s potential request for a transient analysis of the new pressure control system. Scott Foster has performed surge analysis on over 15 different MWD pipelines so understands what MWD is looking for.

Tetra Tech has been in coordination with SCE for the SA-1 Hydro-generator. This previous dealings with SCE will allow Tetra Tech to accelerate the design and obtaining approval for the SA-2 hydrogenerator. Tetra Tech has an excellent working relationship with SCE as can be seen by the latest coordination effort with SCE at the John Garthe Pump Station Facility.

City Council 21 – 37 5/17/2022
TETRA TECH Page | 8
Construction Phasing
Construction phasing will be a key element of the project design and specifications. We will work with the City to minimize the impacts of the construction to the adjoining commercial and residential properties, including the school. We are sensitive to their concerns regarding construction impacts and concerns of the local residences, school and businesses along the proposed alignment. We will consider the following: identify the schools, churches and emergency facilities; develop plans to minimize impacts; maintain access to all commercial, businesses, and residences; evaluate construction noise impacts; and limit the length of the Work Zone. Our previous experience has shown the importance of limiting the length of the total work zone the contractor will be allowed. By requiring the contractor to phase his construction, pressure test, pace final pavement and perform clean-up within reasonable working limits prior to starting new excavation work, the construction impacts to the community/public are minimized.

CEQA and Envision
Tetra Tech understands the City’s process for CEQA approval as we have previously completed the CEQA documentation for Well 32 and Washington Well Rehabilitation Projects. Our CEQA Manager, Paula Fell, has an excellent working relationship with the City’s staff due to these projects.

The City desires to attain the highest Envision Rating possible for this project. All design work shall be completed with the intent to enter the Envision Award process. Tetra Tech’s Project Team has extensive experience in the Envision Certification process. Within the Relevant Experience Section of our proposal, we have listed six (6) projects where Tetra Tech has obtained or pursued a Envision Award of Gold Rating. Due to this experience, Tetra Tech will be able to recommend the most appropriate verification pathway, design and be able to manage the Envision Verification Process on behalf of the City.

Key Design Decisions
Based on our understanding of this project due to preparing the feasibility study, Tetra Tech envisions the following key design decisions that will need to be made by the City:
✓ Confirm PRS and hydro-generator mechanical plan layout. ✓
Location of PRS facility: either 116 or 202 South Flower Street. Tetra Tech recommends that the site not selected be allowed by the City to be used by the contractor as his staging area during construction.
✓
PRS facility to be constructed: within a wall enclosure; within a building; or within a below grade vault structure.
✓
Tetra Tech will prepare preliminary layouts at each site for these three options. Based on noise impacts, Tetra Tech has assumed a below grade vault structure will be selected by the City. ✓ Pipeline alignment selection within West 1st Street, including traffic control. ✓ Pipe material selection and recommended thrust restraint. ✓ Architectural features of the site, including 3D renderings of the site. ✓
Alternative strategies to store energy from the hydro-generator as well as any solar paneling or other alternative energy generation devices. Evaluate locations for possible battery storage unites (size and footprint).
✓
Electrical and control system operating procedures for the PRS and the hydro-generator facility.

Recommendations for communication between SA-2 and Walnut Pump Station.

City Council 21 – 38 5/17/2022
TETRA TECH Page | 9

PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Over the years, Tetra Tech has established well defined, rigorous procedures for project management.

These techniques have been developed and refined and have contributed to our success and reputation. The keys to our project management system are communications, project planning, monitoring, and quality assurance.

The Tetra Tech team’s goal is to keep the City staff “in the loop” from Day One of the project.

Communication tools include the formal progress reports afforded through our project management system and an informal give-and-take approach starting with Tom Epperson, PE, our Project Manager, and extending to every member of the Tetra Tech team. At the project’s outset, the chain of command and appropriate communication methods will be agreed upon and can be as formal or as informal as the City desires. We will use the entire communication spectrum. We will conduct formal meetings with agenda and typewritten notes, and we will use informal meetings with notes to file. We also will have documentation of telephone communications, with notes to file or letters of understanding as appropriate follow-up. Another important communication link will be our e-mail system.

We are proposing to use e-mail to keep the City aware of the status of the project. Every two weeks, Tetra Tech will prepare a brief (one or two paragraphs or bullet items) e-mail summarizing the following:
activities completed in the previous week; the activities planned for the upcoming week; any critical decisions that need to be made; and schedule of upcoming events/meetings. In addition, each month we will prepare a project status memorandum containing the following: summary of project schedule; description of key issues/concerns which have surfaced along with proposed options and solutions; and a project status summary report showing current schedule and budget.

Communications
The key to any successful project is good communications. As our project partner, we propose to involve City staff in open, honest communications from the very start of the project. Our communications will include the following:
• Bi-weekly E-mail Report outlining progress and actions for following week • Monthly Report outlining progress, budget, and potential changes • Monthly Schedule updates
• Regular Meetings with City staff
• Project Documentation available upon request
All information can be provided electronically via e-mail or through a website portal. At each meeting our team will have our project manager and key design staff present to facilitate the discussion.

Quality Control
Our team clearly understands the importance of this project and the importance of ensuring the City receives a quality product. We have assigned a QA/QC Manager, Mark Bush, PE, who has more than 26 years of experience. Mark’s team also includes experienced experts in all areas of design and construction. Mark will ensure that all the project goals are met! A detailed Quality Control/Quality Assurance Plan will be prepared. This plan establishes lines of communications and procedures for ensuring quality during all phases of the project’s design and construction. In keeping with our open communications policy, all of our Quality Control documents will be made available throughout the project. We believe that it is in our best interest to have our clients fully informed and up to date on our quality control process. Information including design reviews, responses to comments and redline plans can be provided in either hard copy or electronically. We will encourage the City staff to let us know whenever they need more information or whenever they are unsure about the quality control of the project. Our goal is to work with City as partners on the project from Notice-to-Proceed through completion.

City Council 21 – 39 5/17/2022
TETRA TECH Page | 10

SCOPE OF WORK
Members of our Project Team have performed an in-depth review of the scope of work contained in the Request for Proposal (RFP), performed a site visit and are very familiar with the existing conditions that may impact the work since we prepared the SA-2 Feasibility Study. Because of the proposal page limitation, we acknowledge the scope of work contained in the RFP and have only added the below tasks that we have comments on or wanted to expand on.

Task 1: Project Administration and Multi-Agency Coordination Tetra Tech’s initial schedule will include the critical path designation and a description of and schedule for progress meetings dealing with Key Design Decisions stated in our Approach Section (Key Design Decisions). Tetra Tech will continually reference the critical path schedule on our bi-weekly status e-mails and monthly schedule updates.

For the purpose of this proposal, Tetra Tech has assumed the following ten (10) meetings: kick-off; one (1) meeting with MWD; two (2) meetings with SCE; four (4) design process review meetings (Basis of Design, 60%, 90% and Final PS&E); and two (2) meetings regarding permits with Public Works, Building, Fire, and Traffic.

Task 2: As Built and Utility Research
Tetra Tech has already performed the preliminary utility research within the project area as part of our SA-2 Feasibility Study. Tetra Tech will update the utility research due to time that has passed since the previous utility research work.

The topographic design survey and the boundary survey for the City selected site will be performed by Tetra Tech’s in-house survey crews. The boundary survey will include setting survey monuments to mark the property corners and the recordation of a Record of Survey with the County of Orange.

The level of effort for potholing and corresponding traffic control plans will be consistent with what was performed during the Well 32 Rehabilitation Project for the City and Mesa’s Well Pipelines project (which involved potholing within the City of Santa Ana streets).

Task 3: Geotechnical Recommendations
Leighton Consulting, Inc., Tetra Tech’s subconsultant, will perform the geotechnical investigation for this project. Leighton is proposing to perform one boring at the PRS site (depth of 25 feet below grade) and five (5) borings along the proposed pipeline alignment (depth of 10 feet below grade). The geotechnical investigation report will include a summary of: site conditions; geologic hazards; seismicity; corrosivity; foundation design for both a vault house and retaining walls; lateral earth pressures; pipe installation requirements; and construction considerations. Traffic control per WATCH Manual will prepared for all geotechnical field work.

Task 4: Civil Operational Project Design Standard and Criteria Tetra Tech will work with the City staff to determine the applicable design standards and criteria in addition to those defined by the feasibility study. For the purposes of this proposal, we have assumed a maximum of eight (8) three (3) hour workshop sessions shall be conducted. The following is a brief summary of the various key design elements, as a minimum, to be discussed in these workshops:
• Pipe alignment including pipe material, thrust restraint, and traffic control concepts; • PRS and hydro-generator mechanical plan layout;
• PRS location and construction alternatives: wall enclosure; within a building; within vault. City Council 21 – 40 5/17/2022 TETRA TECH Page | 11
• SA-2 and generator operational parameters, control conditions including battery storage; • Additional piping to connect to Walnut Reservoir and/or distribution system; • Preliminary electrical and control system design and operating procedures; • Power connection and communication alternatives with Walnut Pump Station; and • Site improvements including WQMP and any specific CEQA requirements.

Task 5: Basis of Design
Tetra Tech will prepare the Basis of Design report which will summarize all of the alternatives and outline the agreed upon alternative including reasons why the alternative was chosen. The Basis of Design will include 30% drawings of the chosen alternative including proposed site improvements.

The nine (9) key design decisions that we identified within our Approach Section (Key Design Decisions) of our proposal will be addressed in addition to the ones noted in the City’s RFP.

We have assumed that a similar mechanical layout to the SA-7 relocation project and the SA-1 hydrogenerator replacement layout will be the starting point for the mechanical layout for the SA-2 facility.

Tetra Tech will evaluate the three alternatives for the facility (wall enclosure, building and vault) at the two potential sites (a minimum of six site exhibits). As part of the evaluation, Tetra Tech will recommend any building or perimeter wall architectural features that will help blend in with the local neighborhood surroundings. Noise will be a major factor in the ultimate selection of the alternative.

We have assumed for this proposal, that the approved alternative for the facility will be a below ground service vault. Tetra Tech will provide 3D renderings of the service vault to assist the City in its evaluation of the station’s operation, maintainability and reparability. Tetra Tech can provide a 3D rendering of OCWD’s Injection Well vault structure as the starting point for the vault alternative evaluation.

Tetra Tech will evaluate the best method of conveying and connecting the power generated by the hydro-generator to the Walnut Pump Station Facility. In addition, Tetra Tech will recommend the electrical improvements at the Walnut Pump Station Facility and at SA-2 Facility to best use the generated power. Tetra Tech will provide alternative strategies to achieve this goal as well as the feasibility of using the power generated in this manner. This will include possible battery storage units, including size and footprint of said units.

With input and assistance from Enterprise Automation, a new Tetra Tech Company, Tetra Tech will work with the City to prepare preliminary electrical and control system design plans and make recommendations for communications between SA-2 and Walnut Pump Station including radio network/ technology options as well as fiber connections.

Tetra Tech will perform any hydraulic modeling as required to confirm the benefit of various connection locations to the City’s distribution system. Tetra Tech is extremely knowledgeable of the City’s water model due to its previous work with ID Modeling (Sedaru) on updating the City’s Water Model.

Tetra Tech is well aware of the issues working with MWD with regards to modifying any of MWD meter connections (previous experience with the SA-5 Vault Upgrade Project).

Tetra Tech’s subconsultant, Scott Foster Engineering, Inc., will assist with satisfying MWD’s potential request for a transient analysis of the new pressure control station. Scott Foster’s scope of work will include: information review; model development under two flow conditions; surge analysis of valve closures, sudden loss of load (runaway) of the hydro-turbine or flow control valve; recommend surge protection measures; and prepare a technical memorandum.

City Council 21 – 41 5/17/2022
TETRA TECH Page | 12
Tetra Tech will prepare the preliminary transmission main alignment along with the proposed pipe bypass alignment showing the bypass to Walnut Reservoir as well as potential connections to the City’s distribution system.

Tetra Tech will define the best management practices (BMP) that will mitigate the project’s impact on stormwater quality according to the North Orange County permit for NPDES, which is under the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. Tetra Tech will perform a site assessment, evaluate the existing and proposed hydrologic conditions, and provide recommendations for low impact development best management practices for treatment and capture of discharges on the site.

Tetra Tech will also provide the following Envision related services during the Basis of Design phase:
• Attend up to three (3) project meetings with City via conference call to discuss Envision; • Include Envision narrative in the Basis of Design report; • Provide input on ISI rating design parameters; and
• Prepare ISI Envision Version 3 Pre-Assessment Checklist and probable project score.

Tetra Tech will prepare a CEQA Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the proposed project. In addition, Tetra Tech has included the budget for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) as an optional item. The following is a brief description of the scope of work for the IS/MND:
• Prepare a draft Project description for use in the IS/MND; • Prepare an Initial Study (IS) analyzing the environmental impacts associated with Project. The technical studies to be prepared include: air quality; greenhouse gas (GHS) emissions; and noise and vibration. A cultural resources letter report will also be prepared. Technical analysis for other CEQA IS resource issues will be based on previously prepared documents, and information provided by the City.
• If the IS identifies no potentially significant impacts, then a Negative Declaration will be prepared. If the IS identifies potentially significant impacts that can be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of mitigation measures (in addition to the Best Management practices), then a MND will be prepared.
• The Draft IS will be prepared according to CEQA requirements and the State CEQA Guidelines (Section 15063). The most recent CEQA Environmental Checklist Form (Appendix G) will be used. • Based upon review comments provided by the City, Tetra Tech will revise the Draft IS and technical reports and prepare the public review draft IS/MND. Tetra Tech will prepare and distribute copies of the public review draft IS/MND to the State Clearinghouse and to the mailing list provided by the City.
• A Notice of Intent to adopt the IS/MND will be prepared by Tetra Tech per Section 15072 of the CEQA Guidelines, for the City’s use in filing with the County Clerk. • Following the end of the 30-day public review period, Tetra Tech will prepare written responses to any comments received on the public review draft IS/MND. For this proposal, we have assumed the preparation of responses to a maximum of five individual comments. • Tetra Tech will provide a draft Mitigation Monitoring and Report Plan (MMRP) to be incorporated into the final documentation of the IS/MND.

City Council 21 – 42 5/17/2022
TETRA TECH Page | 13
• An administrative final IS/MND with the responses to comments, the MMRP, and any revisions to the final IS/MND will be prepared and submitted to the City. • Tetra Tech will prepare the Notice of Determination (NOD) for the City to file with the County Clerk and will file the NOD with the State Clearinghouse.

Task 6 through Task 8: PS&E Construction Documents
Tetra Tech will prepare 60%, 90% and Final Construction Document (PS&E) submittals as specified within the RFP. The plans will be prepared in accordance with the City’s Design Guidelines for Water Facilities. Tetra Tech will compile in a matrix format all comments received and responses made for each document submittal. This spreadsheet will be submitted to all reviewers prior to and as part of each submittal.

Tetra Tech will prepare a waiver request letter to the Division of Drinking Water (DDW) for all water main alignments or crossings which do not meet DDW’s latest separation requirements.

We anticipate the construction drawings will include the following:
1 Title Sheet with Vicinity and Project Location Maps and General Notes 2 Notes for Project, Standard Water Notes, MWD Requirements and Sheet Index 3 Public Works/Building/Fire Notes, and Traffic Concepts 4 Abbreviations, Standard Symbols, Utility/Agency Index; Bench Mark, etc. 5 Construction Notes
6 Horizontal Control Plan
7 Existing SA-2 Demolition Plan and Details
8 Existing SA-2 Demolition Sections and Details
9 Construction Phasing and Staging Requirements for Adjacent City Property 10 SA-2 Shoring, Noise Control and Monitoring Plan
11 SA-2 Site and Grading Plan
12 SA-2 Site Details
13 SA-2 Yard Piping Plan
14 Perimeter Wall Plan, Profile and Details
15 Yard Piping Profiles and Connections
16 Site Details including Driveway, Gate and Site Improvements 17 WQMP Plan, Sections and Details
18 - 21 High-Pressure Pipeline Plan and Profile (4 sheets) 22 - 24 Optional Additional Distribution Pipeline Plan and Profile (3 sheets) 25 Walnut Bypass Plan, Profile and Details
26 MWD Meter Vault and Walnut Bypass Connection Details 27 Trench and Miscellaneous Details
28 Piping and Appurtenances Details
29 Connection Details to Distribution System and Abandonment Plan 30 Pavement Replacement Plan and Street Restoration
31 Walnut Pump Station Modifications and Restoration City Council 21 – 43 5/17/2022 TETRA TECH Page | 14
32 SA-2 and Hydro-generator Mechanical Plan
33 SA-2 and Hydro-generator Sections
34 Mechanical Appurtenances and Hydro-generator Details 35 Miscellaneous Piping and Support Details
36 Vault Ventilation Plan and Equipment Summary
37 Battery Storage Units Plan, Section and Details
38 General Structural Notes and Special Inspections/Structural Observations 39 Vault Foundation and Roof Deck Plans
40 - 41 Vault Traverse and Longitudinal Sections (2 sheets) 42 Vault Details
43 Typical Structural Details
44 Electrical Symbols and Abbreviations
45 SA-2 Electrical Plan
46 SA-2 Instrumentation and Control Plan
47 SA-2 Lighting and Grounding Plan
48 Single Line Diagram and Electrical Schedules
49 SA-2 Gate Operator Plan
50 Electrical Details
51 Electrical Conduit to Walnut Pump Station Facility
52 Walnut Pump Station Electrical Plan
53 Hydro-Generator Control Logic and Details
54 Battery Storage Plan and Details
55 Battery Control Panel
56 Instrumentation and Control Symbols and Abbreviations 57 I&C P&ID
58 I&C Network Diagram and I/Os
59 SA-2 Control Panel Elevations and Details
60 Hydro-Generator Synchronization Control Panel and Details Tetra Tech will provide the following Envision related services during the PS&E phase of the work:
• Complete ISI Envision rating of the project.
• Register the project with ISI and complete rating and submit for verification. City of Santa Ana will need to pay the registration and verification fees, which are expected to be around $15,000 to $20,000.
• Compile documentation of the project and prepare credit narratives and cover sheets. • We have assumed that calculations will not be necessary and all required data will be included in the Basis of Design report or final design calculations and CEQA documents. • Prepare specification that will direct the construction contractor of their requirements during construction necessary to achieve Envision goal. City Council 21 – 44 5/17/2022 TETRA TECH Page | 15
Task 9: Bidding and Construction Phase Services
Throughout the bidding and construction phase, Tetra Tech will provide assistance to the City’s Project Manager and Construction Manager as requested in the RFP.

We have assumed that two (2) Addendum will be prepared.

We have assumed that the City’s Construction Manager will be the primarily responsible to evaluate and respond to the Contractor’s requests for change orders. We have assumed that Tetra Tech will support the Construction Manager as requested. For this proposal, we have assumed a maximum of four (4) hours of Project Manager and eight (8) hours of Construction Support Lead for each change order request that will need our attention.

Tetra Tech, with support from Enterprise Automation, will perform Factory and Site Acceptance Testing of all control equipment. Tetra Tech will provide as-needed support to the City’s contractor who will be responsible for installing instrumentation, fabricating and installing control panels, installing equipment and implementing network infrastructure modifications. For this proposal, we have assumed a maximum of two days of the panel FAT to support the contractor and assist with executing the FAT procedures. Tetra Tech will also participate in and oversee up to 2 days of the City’s programmer’s FAT and SAT testing to ensure they are in compliance with the FAT and SAT protocols developed for the project.

Tetra Tech will review a maximum of sixty (60) shop drawing submittals. For this proposal, we have assumed that twenty (20) of the submittals will require a second review.

Tetra Tech will provide the following Envision related services during the construction phase:

Compile documentation from City’s construction management staff and construction contractor to validate credits requiring commitments during construction phase and to support post-construction review by ISI.

Task 10: As-Built Preparation
Tetra Tech will prepare the construction drawings using the latest version of AutoCAD. As part of the As-Built Preparation Task, Tetra Tech will convert all construction drawings to MicroStation v8i format or compatible and submit the as-builts drawings in MicroStation format.

Task 11: Commissioning Bid Item
Enterprise Automation will assist Tetra Tech’s project team in supporting the City in the commissioning of the SA-2 facility into operation.

Task 12: Operations and Maintenance Manual
Enterprise Automation will assist Tetra Tech’s project team in preparing an operational site manual that fully defines how the site functions. In addition, all operator duties will be defined and procedures for field checking common errors will be established. The intent of this site manual is to define standard operating procedures for field operations of this facility. Tetra Tech will request an example of an operational site manual for one of the City’s other facilities.

City Council 21 – 45 5/17/2022
TETRA TECH Page | 16

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
During the last 15 years, our Project Team has designed more than 200 miles of water, recycled water, and sewer mains within fully developed areas having extensive traffic control and utility conflicts.

During that same time frame, our Project Team has designed more than 15 flow control or pressure reducing facilities. The following table summarizes some of the relevant project experience that our Project Team has completed during the last five (5) years:

Client Project Design
Complete
Project Team
Responsible Staff

MOULTON NIGUEL

WATER DISTRICT
Laguna Niguel
Matt Collings, PE
949/425-3552
Crown Valley Pipeline Replacements:
9,600 feet of 12-inch water main within
Crown Valley Parkway including
ID No. 1 Master Meter Relocation
(10 cfs capacity)
2022
Tom Epperson
Matt Vera
Erin Cabañero
Erica Jenkins
Jaden Miller
Mazen Kassar
Doug Seaman
Eric Yuen
Peter Kim
Paula Fell

MESA WATER

DISTRICT
Santa Ana/Costa Mesa
Andrew Wiesner, PE
949/207-5458
Chandler and Croddy Wells Pipeline:

Two Wells (Well Nos. 12 and 14) located
within Santa Ana including 4,500 feet of
16”/30” water mains within Chandler Ave.;
Croddy Way; MacArthur Blvd.
2021
Tom Epperson
Erin Cabañero
Erica Jenkins
Mazen Kassar
Eric Yuen
Peter Kim
Paula Fell

ORANGE COUNTY

WATER DISTRICT
Fountain Valley
Chris Olsen, PE
714/378-3232
Mid-Basin Injection Wells:

Four Injection Wells within Vault Structures
10,500 feet of 36” to 12” pipelines within
Edinger Ave. and Centennial Park
2017
Tom Epperson
Erin Cabañero
Mazen Kassar
Eric Yuen
Nate Schreiner
Peter Kim

CITY OF ANAHEIM
Anaheim
Jake Hester, PE
714/765-4421
PRS-SCADA Upgrades
Rehab and Upgrade PRS Nos. 1 – 6
Katella Water Main Replacement:
7,000 feet of 12” to 16” water mains within
Katella Ave. from Haster Street to
Disneyland Drive
2022
2017
2017
Tom Epperson
Erica Jenkins
Jaden Miller
Mazen Kassar
Doug Seaman
Eric Yuen
Peter Kim

EL TORO WATER

DISTRICT
Laguna Woods
Dennis Cafferty, PE
949/837-7050, ext. 223
Recycled Water Expansion – Phase II:
20,600 feet of 4” to 10” recycled water
mains
2018
Tom Epperson
Erin Cabanero
Erica Jenkins
Jaden Miller

CITY OF

NEWPORT BEACH
Newport Beach
Mike Sinacori, PE
949/644-3342
Newport Blvd Water Main Replacement:

Newport Pier Area WM Replacement
5,200 of 24” to 8” water mains within
Newport and Balboa Boulevards and
5,800 feet of 6” mains in residential streets
2017
Tom Epperson
Neha Gajjar
Erin Cabañero
Peter Kim
City Council 21 – 46 5/17/2022
TETRA TECH Page | 17
City of Santa Ana Experience
Members of our project team have completed more than 40 water/wastewater projects for the City since 1999. Our project team knows the City’s design requirements and standards, preferred materials, and operational preferences which will allow us to complete the design in the most cost-effective manner. In addition, Enterprise Automation, one of the City’s Control System Design Programmers, is now a Tetra Tech company. We believe that our best reference is our past performance on projects that we have completed for the City. We are confident that these past projects with the City will attest to our technical excellence, responsive staff, and our complete understanding of the City’s facilities.

The following is a brief list of relevant City projects we have been completed in the last 5 years.

Pipeline Projects:
▪ Well 32 Rehabilitation: 3,600 feet of 12-inch well discharge piping within Westwood Avenue; Memory Lane; and Bristol Street;
▪ Ritchey Street Water Main Relocation: 1,800 feet of 8-inch and 16-inch water main within Ritchey Street;
▪ Water Main Improvements: 900 feet of 20-inch and 12-inch water mains within French Street; and Spurgeon Street;
▪ San Lorenzo Sewers: 1,400 feet of 10-inch force main and 15-inch gravity main within Segerstrom Avenue and Bristol Street; and
▪ Centennial Park Neighborhood Water Main Improvements: 20,000 feet of 8-inch mains.

Pressure Reducing Stations:
▪ SA-1 Hydro-Generator Replacement;
▪ SA-2 Relocation Feasibility Study;
▪ SA-7 Pressure Reducing Station Relocation;
▪ SA-5 Vault Modifications; and
▪ SA-4 Vault Relocation.

Envision Experience
Our Project Team has completed the following projects that included Envision Certification:
▪ Albion Riverside Park for City of Los Angeles: Regional stormwater BMP and park project along the Los Angeles River; Envision Award Received: Gold.
▪ Santa Monica Clean Beaches Initiative for City of Santa Monica: Regional stormwater BMP project near Santa Monica Pier; Envision Award Received: Gold.
▪ Taylor Yard Bikeway/Pedestrian Bridge for City of Los Angeles: Pedestrian Bridge over the Los Angeles River: Envision Award Received: Gold.
▪ Vista Canyon Regional Transit Center for City of Santa Clarita: Regional bus transit station:

Envision Award Received: Verified.
▪ Aliso Creek – Limekiln Creek Restoration for City of Los Angeles: Regional stormwater BMP and creek restoration project: Envision Award Pursued: Gold. ▪ San Fernando Valley Stormwater Capture Projects for City of Los Angeles: Multiple regional stormwater BMP projects: Envision Award Pursued: Gold.

City Council 21 – 47 5/17/2022
TETRA TECH Page | 18

SCHEDULE
Tetra Tech has the necessary resources to rapidly deploy and meet aggressive schedules. Our Project Team has recent pipeline and PRS experience with the City so we have a good understanding of the issues which may arise that could affect the project schedule. We have reviewed our Project Team’s current workload and will be able to accommodate the schedule milestones on the schedule provided on the next page.

REFERENCES
We believe the City, itself, is one of our best references based on the work we have previously completed for the City. Client satisfaction is a major objective for Tetra Tech. This commitment to our clients has earned us the privilege of providing continuous service to several of the below listed references. We believe that our clients will attest to our technical experience and responsive staff. We encourage you to contact our references to verify our past performance firsthand. We have provided contact names and phone numbers for these references below.  Moulton Niguel Water
District
Matt Collings, PE
949/425-3552
On-Call Services;
6 PRS and 6 Meter Projects
10 Pipeline Projects
 Orange County Water District
Chris Olsen, PE
714/378-3232
On-Call PFAS Services;
2 Pump Stations; Well Injection;
6 Pipeline Projects
 Mesa Water District
Andrew Wiesner, PE
949/207-5458
On-Call Services; 2 Wells;
Valve Replacement; 2 Pipeline
Projects
 City of Anaheim
Jake Hester, PE
714/765-4421
8 PRS Projects;
1 Reservoir; 6 Pipeline
Projects
 El Toro Water District
Dennis Cafferty, PE
949/837-7050, ext. 223
RW Pipeline Expansions;
Oso Lift Station; 6 Studies
 City of Newport Beach
Mike Sinacori, PE
949/644-3342
8 Pipeline Projects; Reservoir cover;
2 RW Pump Stations;
4 Retrofit Projects

FEE PROPOSAL
As requested in the RFP, Tetra Tech has included our fee proposal, hourly rate schedule and estimated hours in a separate submission to the City.

STANDARD AGREEMENT
Tetra Tech has reviewed the City’s Standard Agreement provided in the RFP. Tetra Tech will sign the agreement, with no changes, as we have in all of our previous contracts with the City. However, the City may want to consider the following revisions since the duty to defend (in Section 8, Indemnification) is not typically applicable to performance of professional services:
“Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, … including death, and claims for property damage, to the extent caused by which may arise from the negligent operations of the Consultant, … to the services described in Section 1 of the Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, … by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to identify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, … arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect …”
City Council 21 – 48 5/17/2022
TETRA TECH Page | 19
City Council 21 – 49 5/17/2022
SA-2
Pressure Control
Station Relocation
and Transmission Main
Improvements
RFP No. 21-127
Certifications
City Council 21 – 50 5/17/2022
 
City Council 21 – 515/17/2022 

CITY OF SANTA ANA
RFP NO.: 21-127
SA-2 PRESSURE CONTROL STATION RELOCATION AND TRANSMISSION MAIN

IMPROVEMENTS