Agenda packet — Santa Ana City Council, January 16, 2024 (part 6 of 8)

*Recorded by Andrea Dumovich Heywood *Date November 2, 2023 Continuation  Update DPR 523L
Ancestry.com. California, Death Index, 1940-1997 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2000.

Harris, Cyril M. American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia. New York, WW Norton, 1998.

Marsh, Diann. Santa Ana, An Illustrated History. Encinitas, Heritage Publishing, 1994.

McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984.

National Register Bulletin 16A. “How to Complete the National Register Registration Form.” Washington DC: National Register
Newspapers.com (Orange County Register and Santa Ana Register) Branch, National Park Service, US Dept. of the Interior, 1991.

Office of Historic Preservation. “Instructions for Recording Historical Resources.” Sacramento: March 1995.

Whiffen, Marcus. American Architecture Since 1780. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1969.

Santa Ana and Orange County Directories, 1948-2008.

Talbert, Thomas B. The Historical Volume and Reference Works: Covering Garden Grove, Santa Ana, Tustin. Volume 1:

Orange County. Whittier: Historical Publishers, 1963.

City Council 22 – 69 1/16/2024
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________

Page 5 ends

*Recorded by Andrea Dumovich Heywood *Date November 2, 2023 Continuation  Update DPR 523L
Additional Figures:

Figure 2. The exterior of the house is clad in wood shingles.

Wood windows with a prominent wood window sill and trim are located on all building facades, facing east.

Figure 3. The front porch, featuring the main entrance, is supported by a single wood post on a raised concrete
platform accessible by two concrete steps, facing north.

Figure 4. The primary (west) façade features a large, fixed wood window flanked by two double-hung wood windows with a four-over-four muntin pattern , facing southeast.

Figure 5. The south (side) façade features windows
composed of four-over-four double-hung wood windows
and one-over-one double-hung wood windows, facing
north.

Figure 6. The bbuilding’s southeast (rear) corner contains a covered porch supported by a slender wood post and a raised concrete platform, facing northwest.

Figure 7. The detached garage is clad in wood shingle
siding to match the main residence and features an
asphalt shingle roof, metal roll-up garage door, and a
single pedestrian wood door with an operable upper
light, facing southeast.

City Council 22 – 70 1/16/2024

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
1607 North Freeman Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 1 -
Exhibit C
Exterior work shall be reviewed by the Historic Resources Commission and subject to the U.S.

Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, as follows:

1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site and its environment, or to use a property for its originally intended purpose.

2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible.

3. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged.

4. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site and its environment.

These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected.

5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site shall be treated with sensitivity.

6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, whenever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from the other buildings or structures.

7. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken.

8. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and reserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to any project.

9. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material, an such design is compatible with City Council 22 – 71 1/16/2024

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
1607 North Freeman Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 2 -
size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment.

10. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations need to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired.

City Council 22 – 72 1/16/2024
Proposed Structure Improvements (“Work Plan”)
1607 North Freeman Street
Item Year Improvement
1 2024 Replace non-original front door and front entrance light with period appropriate door and light.
2 2024 Replace rear, security screen door with period appropriate screen door.
3 2024 Update bathroom with new plumbing, add light fixtures, replace shower with glass shower door, and new tile.
4 2028 Potentially add new bathroom addition to rear
5 2030 Possible reroof, asses by 2025 if needed
6 Ongoing
throughout
duration of
contract

1. Exterior wood shingle siding maintenance/repair

2. Maintain original wood windows as needed
Exhibit D
City Council 22 – 73 1/16/2024
Planning and Building Agency
Item # 1
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Historic Resources Commission Staff Report
November 2, 2023
Topic: HRCA No. 2023-18, HRC No. 2023-5, HPPA No. 2023-11 – Rogers-Mansfield House (1607 North Freeman Street)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Adopt a resolution approving Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2023-18 and Historic Register Categorization No. 2023-5 (Exhibit 1).

2. Recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute the attached Mills Act agreement with Daniel and Robbyn Taylor, subject to non-substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney (Exhibit 2).

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Daniel and Robbyn Taylor are requesting approval to designate an existing Minimal Traditional style residence located at 1607 North Freeman Street to the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties, as well as approval to execute a Mills Act agreement with the City of Santa Ana. The property is worthy of local designation as “Key” status because it has a distinctive architectural style and quality reflective of the Minimal Traditional style in Santa Ana, along with rare wood shingle siding.

DISCUSSION
Project Location and Site Description
The subject property is located on the east side of North Freeman Street in Santa Ana’s Washington Square neighborhood. The site contains a 1,335-square-foot, Minimal Traditional style residence and detached garage, on a 6,276-square-foot residential lot (Exhibit 3).

Exhibit 4
Historic Resources Commission 1 – 1 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 74 1/16/2024
HRCA No. 2023-18, HRC 2023-5, HPPA No. 2023-11 – Rogers-Mansfield House (1607 North Freeman Street)
November 2, 2023

Page 2 ends

Analysis of the Issues
Historical Listing
In March 1999, the City Council approved Ordinance No. NS-2363 establishing the Historic Resources Commission and the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The Historic Resources Commission may, by resolution and at a noticed public hearing, designate as a historical property any building or part thereof, object, structure, or site having importance to the history or architecture of the city in accordance with the criteria set forth in Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC). This project entails applying the selection criteria established in Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Places of Historical and Architectural Significance) to determine if this structure is eligible for historic designation to the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The first criterion for selection requires that the structures be 50 or more years old.

The structure identified meets the selection criteria for inclusion on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to criteria contained in Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, as the structure is 75 years old and is a sound example of period architecture. No known code violations exist on record for this property.

The Rogers-Mansfield House is architecturally significant as an intact example of a Minimal Traditional style house in Santa Ana. According to City building records, it was built in 1948 for approximately $10,000, for Emmet C. Rogers; however, the original architect and builder are unknown. Emmet C. Rogers was a local contractor who sold lots and built homes in Santa Ana. Mr. Rogers only resided at the property for one year or less as John N. Mansfield is listed as the owner by 1949. City Directories show Mr.

Mansfield owned the property from 1949 until at least 1960. City Directories are unavailable between 1961and1979. Criss-Cross Directories between 1980 and 1998 show the subject address but do not include a property tenant or owner name. By 1999, the subject property was owned by Paul Williamson, who owned the property until at least 2008, the date of the last available directory. The current owners Daniel and Robbyn Taylor have owned and resided in the subject property since 2022. No additional information was uncovered regarding the past owners and tenants.

The Rogers-Mansfield House is a one-story, single-family, Minimal Traditional Style residence located on a modestly sized parcel in Santa Ana’s Washington Square neighborhood. The residence exhibits an L-shaped plan with a medium-pitch roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles and shallow eaves. While primarily side-gabled, a frontgable projects at the primary (west) façade along with a flat front porch roof projection.

The exterior of the house is clad in wood shingles. Wood windows with a prominent wood window sill and trim are located on all building facades. The front porch is supported by a single, slender wood post on a raised concrete platform accessible by two concrete Historic Resources Commission 1 – 2 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 75 1/16/2024
HRCA No. 2023-18, HRC 2023-5, HPPA No. 2023-11 – Rogers-Mansfield House (1607 North Freeman Street)
November 2, 2023

Page 3 ends

steps. The main entrance, located under the front porch, faces south and is composed of a four panel replacement door with four upper lights.

Fenestration on the primary (west) façade includes three window bays. The front gable displays a large, fixed wood window flanked by two double-hung wood windows with a four-over-four muntin pattern. Along the side-gable of the primary (west) façade is the same double-hung style window and muntin pattern in both paired and singular form. The north, south, and rear (east) façade window pattern is composed of a mix of one-overone double-hung wood windows and four-over-four double-hung wood windows. The building’s southeast (rear) corner contains a covered porch supported by a slender wood post and a raised concrete platform. A single pedestrian wood door and upper light, located behind a metal security door, is tucked within the rear porch. Additional architectural features include a concrete driveway with a concrete path leading to the front porch, brick chimney at the north (side) façade, as well as vents at the gable ends. The rear yard contains a single-story, detached garage clad in wood shingle siding to match the main residence. The garage features an asphalt shingle roof, metal roll-up garage door, and a single pedestrian wood door with an operable upper light. The property is landscaped with a front lawn, two mature trees, and rose bushes near the front porch.

Character-defining features of the Rogers-Mansfield House include, but may not be limited to: L-shaped plan; single-story massing; side-gable body with prominent frontgable; medium-pitch roof with shallow eaves; wood shingle siding; original wood windows with a prominent wood window sill and trim are located on all building facades; front and rear porch, each supported by a single wood post located on a raised concrete platform; main entrance located within front porch; brick chimney; overall lack of ornamentation; front yard lawn with landscaping including two mature trees; and a detached garage featuring wood shingle siding and a single pedestrian door with operable light.

The Rogers-Mansfield House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Minimal Traditional style home in Santa Ana. The recommended categorization is “Key” because it has a distinctive architectural style and quality reflective of the Minimal Traditional style, along with rare wood shingle siding. This category is reserved for structures exemplifying greater architectural significance than the “Contributive” category, in addition to contributing to the overall neighborhood or district within the City of Santa Ana. The property is worthy of “Key” status due to the building’s Minimal Traditional style and quality craftsmanship which features simple massing and lack of ornamentation; original double-hung wood windows throughout; and rare wood shingle siding, among other original features.

Mills Act Agreement
Ordinance No. NS-2382 authorized the Historic Resources Commission to execute Historic Property Preservation Agreements (HPPA), commonly known as Mills Act Historic Resources Commission 1 – 3 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 76 1/16/2024
HRCA No. 2023-18, HRC 2023-5, HPPA No. 2023-11 – Rogers-Mansfield House (1607 North Freeman Street)
November 2, 2023

Page 4 ends

agreements for eligible properties (Exhibit 2). To be eligible for the Mills Act, the property must be listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The Historic Resources Commission Application and Historic Register Categorization actions proposed for this site authorize the listing of the property on the local register. The agreement provides monetary incentives to the property owner in the form of a property tax reduction in exchange for the owner’s voluntary commitment to maintain the property in a good state of repair as necessary to maintain its character and appearance. Once recorded, the agreement generates a different valuation method in determining the property’s assessed value, resulting in tax savings for the owner. Aside from the tax savings, the benefits include:
• Long term preservation of the property and visual improvement to the neighborhood • A mechanism to provide for property rehabilitation
• Incentives for potential buyers to purchase historic structures • Discouraging of inappropriate alterations to the property The property has no identified unauthorized modifications. Upon consideration of the application, it is recommended that the City enter into a Historic Property Preservation Agreement.

Overall, future improvements proposed by the homeowners during the initial five years of the Mills Act Agreement include replacing the non-original front door with a compatible door. Remaining items to be completed over the course of the first ten years of the Mills Act Agreement include replacing the front entrance light, and rear, security screen door with period-appropriate materials. Additionally, the existing bathroom will be updated with new plumbing, lighting fixtures, tile, and shower glass. The homeowners may add a new bathroom to the building’s rear, and the roof will be assessed in the coming years to determine if a reroof is needed. Lastly, maintenance/repair of existing, original wood windows and wood shingle siding will be a general on-going maintenance task as part of this Mills Act Agreement. Staff will ensure that all proposed work will be done sensitively and will maintain the property’s character defining features as part of the Mills Act Agreement for this property. If the homeowners decide to pursue a bathroom addition, staff will work closely with the owners to ensure that the new design shall meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation, and that the new work will receive proper entitlement through a Historic Exterior Modification Application (HEMA) and building permits as necessary.

As part of the Mills Act approval process, staff will work with the applicant to ensure that a bronze plaque is installed honoring and recognizing the structure. The plaque will include the historic name, address, year built, and local historic register designation.

Lastly, the site will be subject to general maintenance and upkeep requirements including, but not limited to, replacement or restoration of damaged character-defining features, landscaping upkeep, painting, etc. Upon consideration of the application, it is Historic Resources Commission 1 – 4 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 77 1/16/2024
HRCA No. 2023-18, HRC 2023-5, HPPA No. 2023-11 – Rogers-Mansfield House (1607 North Freeman Street)
November 2, 2023

Page 5 ends

recommended that the City enter into a Historic Property Preservation Agreement to enable the Mills Act.

Public Notification
The subject site is located within the Washington Square Neighborhood Association. The president of this Neighborhood Association was notified by mail 10 days prior to this public hearing. In addition, the project site was posted with a notice advertising this public hearing, a notice was published in the Orange County Reporter and mailed notices were sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the project site. At the time of this printing, no correspondence, either written or electronic, has been received from any members of the public.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15331 of the CEQA Guidelines (Class 31 – Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) as these actions are designed to preserve historic resources. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2023-107 will be filed for this project.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Historic Property Preservation Agreement will reduce the Property Tax revenue account 01102002-50011 to the City by an estimated $970.20 annually, for a period of not less than ten years.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Mills Act Agreement

3. 500-Foot Radius Map
Submitted By:

Andrea Heywood, Associate Planner
Approved By:

Minh Thai, Executive Director of Planning and Building Agency, Planning and Building Agency
Historic Resources Commission 1 – 5 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 78 1/16/2024

FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2023-XX

Page 1 of 6 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2023-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC RESOURCES

COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING
HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION APPLICATION NO.
2023-18 TO PLACE THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1607

NORTH FREEMAN STREET, SANTA ANA, ON THE

HISTORICAL REGISTER AND APPROVING HISTORIC
REGISTER CATEGORIZATION NO. 2023-05 PLACING

SAID PROPERTY WITHIN THE KEY CATEGORY

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows:

A. On November 2, 2023, the Historic Resources Commission held a duly noticed public hearing for the placement on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties (Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2023-18) and categorization (Historic Resources Commission Categorization No. 2023-5) of the Rogers-Mansfield House located at 1607 North Freeman Street, Santa Ana.

B. The Rogers-Mansfield House has distinctive architectural features of the Minimal Traditional style and was built in 1948.

C. The Rogers-Mansfield House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Minimal Traditional style home in Santa Ana. The house displays characteristics of the Minimal Traditional style through its use of medium-pitch roof; sidegable and front-gable roof system; shallow eave overhang; one-story height; double-hung multi-pane windows; and overall lack of architectural detailing. The recommended categorization is “Key” because it has a distinctive architectural style and quality reflective of the Minimal Traditional style, along with rare wood shingle siding (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). This category is reserved for structures exemplifying greater architectural significance than the “Contributive” category, in addition to contributing to the overall neighborhood or district within the City of Santa Ana. The property is worthy of “Key” status due to the building’s Minimal Traditional style and quality craftsmanship which features simple massing and lack of ornamentation; original double-hung wood windows throughout; and rare wood shingle siding, among other original features.

Character-defining features of the Rogers-Mansfield House include, but may not be limited to: L-shaped plan; single-story massing; side-gable body with prominent front-gable; medium-pitch roof with shallow eaves; wood Historic Resources Commission 1 – 6 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 79 1/16/2024

FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2023-XX

Page 2 of 6 ends

shingle siding; original wood windows with a prominent wood window sill and trim are located on all building facades; front and rear porch, each supported by a single wood post located on a raised concrete platform; main entrance located within front porch; brick chimney; overall lack of ornamentation; front yard lawn with landscaping including two mature trees; and a detached garage featuring wood shingle siding and a single pedestrian door with operable light.

D. The legal owners of the property are Daniel Taylor and Robbyn Taylor, Husband and Wife as Joint Tenants.

E. The legal description for the subject property is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein.

F. The subject property meets the standards for placement on the City of Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties pursuant to Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code.

G. The subject property meets the minimal standards for placement in the Key category pursuant to Section 30-2.2(2) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code.

H. In addition to meeting the standards for placement in the Key category pursuant to Section 30-2.2(2) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the applicant has agreed, as part of the requested Mills Act agreement work plan, to restoration of select elements described therein within the first five years of the Agreement’s term.

Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15331, Class 31, as these actions are designed to preserve historical resources.

Categorical Exemption No. ER-2023-107 will be filed for this project.

Section 3. The Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby approves:

A. Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2023-18 to place the Rogers-Mansfield House located at 1607 North Freeman Street, Santa Ana, 92706 on the historical register, and
B. Historic Register Categorization No. 2023-5 placing the Rogers-Mansfield House located at 1607 North Freeman Street, Santa Ana, 92706 within the Key category, as conditioned in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

These decisions are based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Staff report and exhibits attached thereto, the report entitled “Historical Property Description,” and the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 4. For the subject property, a report entitled “Historical Property Description” is on file with the Planning Division, and is hereby approved and adopted, and together with the staff report and this Resolution, justify the findings for placement on the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties into a category. The Historic Resources Historic Resources Commission 1 – 7 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 80 1/16/2024

FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2023-XX

Page 3 of 6 ends

Commission Secretary is authorized and directed to include this Resolution in the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties.

Section 5. The Historic Resources Commission Secretary is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Recorder’s Office after the adoption of this Resolution pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5029.

ADOPTED this 2
nd day of November, 2023.
__________________________
Tim Rush
Chairperson
Historic Resources Commission 1 – 8 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 81 1/16/2024

FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2023-XX

Page 4 of 6 ends

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
By:________________________
Brandon Salvatierra
Deputy City Attorney
AYES: Commission members____________________________________ NOES: Commission members___________________________________ ABSTAIN: Commission members___________________________________ NOT PRESENT: Commission members___________________________________

CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, NUVIA OCAMPO, Historic Resources Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2023-XX to be the original resolution adopted by Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana on November 2, 2023.

Date: ________________ ____________________________________ Nuvia Ocampo
Commission Secretary
City of Santa Ana
Historic Resources Commission 1 – 9 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 82 1/16/2024

FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2023-XX

Page 5 of 6 ends

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
APN Address Legal Description Owner Names
405-313-05 1607 North Freeman
Street

THE LAND REFERRED TO

HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED

IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND
IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

LOT 16 OF TRACT NO. 1228,

IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA,

COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE

OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 38,
PAGE(S) 42 OF

MISCELLANEOUS OF MAPS,

IN THE OFFICE OF THE

COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID ORANGE COUNTY.

APN: 405-313-05
Daniel and
Robbyn Taylor
Historic Resources Commission 1 – 10 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 83 1/16/2024

FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2023-XX

Page 6 of 6 ends

EXHIBIT B
Conditions of Approval for Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2023-18 and Historic Resources Commission Categorization No. 2023-5 The Applicant must comply with each condition listed below prior to exercising the rights conferred by the Historic Resource Commission’s approval and the City of Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties pursuant to Section 30-6 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. The Applicant must remain in compliance with all condition(s) listed below:

1. Within 180-days of execution of this resolution, the applicant shall install a bronze plaque as per a template on file with the Planning Division honoring and recognizing the structure at 1607 North Freeman Street, historically known as the Rogers-Mansfield House. The plaque shall include the historic name, address, year built, and local historic register designation.

The final dimensions, location, text and description on the plaque shall be reviewed and approved by Planning Division staff.

2. The applicant shall regularly maintain all landscaping in the front yard area (pruning and thinning trees and shrubs) so that the historic building and its character defining features (including but not limited to the front gable and side gable roofs, wood windows, and wood shingle siding) are visible from the public right-of-way.

Historic Resources Commission 1 – 11 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 84 1/16/2024

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Attn: Clerk of the Council
FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
_________________________________________________________________________

HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT
This Historic Property Preservation Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as “City”), and Daniel Taylor and Robbyn Taylor, Husband and Wife as Joint Tenants, (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Owner”), owner of real property located at 1607 North Freeman Street, Santa Ana, California, in the County of Orange and listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties.

RECITALS
A. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana is authorized by California Government Code Section 50280 et seq. (known as the “Mills Act”) to enter into contracts with owners of qualified historical properties to provide for appropriate use, maintenance, rehabilitation and restoration such that these historic properties retain their historic character and integrity.

B. The Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain qualified real property together with associated structures and improvements thereon, located at 1607 North Freeman Street, Santa Ana, CA, 92706 and more particularly described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and hereinafter referred to as the “Historic Property”.

C. The Historic Property is officially designated on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code.

D. City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this Agreement which defines and limits the use and alteration of this Historic Property in order to enhance and maintain its value as a cultural and historical resource for Owner and for the community; to prevent inappropriate alterations to the Historic Property and to ensure that repairs, additions, new building, and other changes are appropriate; and to ensure that rehabilitation and maintenance are carried out in an exemplary manner.

Historic Resources Commission 1 – 12 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 85 1/16/2024

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
1607 North Freeman Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 2 -
E. Owner and City intend to carry out the purposes of California Government Code, Chapter 1, Part 5 of Division 1 of Title 5, Article 12, Section 50280 et seq., which will enable the Historic Property to qualify for an assessment of valuation as a restricted historical property pursuant to Article 1.9, Sec. 439 et seq., Chapter 3 Part 2 of Division 1 of the California Tax and Revenue Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Santa Ana and the Owner of the Historic Property agree as follows:

1. Effective Date and Terms of Agreement.

This Agreement shall be effective and commence on January 17, 2024, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten (10) years thereafter. Each year, upon the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in California Government Code Sections 50280 through 50290 and in Section 2, below.

2. Renewal.
a. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, a year shall automatically be added to the initial ten (10) year term of this Agreement unless written notice of nonrenewal is served as provided herein.
b. If the Owner or the City desire(s) in any year not to renew the Agreement, the Owner or City shall serve written notice of nonrenewal of the Agreement on the other party.

Unless such notice is served by the Owner to the City at least ninety (90) days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by the City to the Owner at least sixty (60) days prior to the annual renewal date, one (1) year shall automatically be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein.
c. Within 30 days from receipt of City’s notice of nonrenewal, the Owner may file a written protest of City’s decision of nonrenewal. The City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its notice to the Owner of nonrenewal. d. If either the Owner or the City serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply.

3. Standards and Conditions for Historic Property.

During the term of this Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements and restrictions:
a. Owner shall maintain the Historic Property in a good state of repair and shall preserve, maintain, and, where necessary, restore or rehabilitate the property and its characterdefining features described in the “Executive Summary” attached hereto, marked as Exhibit B1, and “Historical Property Description” attached hereto, marked as Exhibit B2, notably the general architectural form, style, materials, design, scale, proportions, organization of windows, doors, Historic Resources Commission 1 – 13 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 86 1/16/2024

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
1607 North Freeman Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 3 -
and other openings, textures, details, mass, roof line, porch and other aspects of the appearance of the exterior to the satisfaction of the City.
b. All changes to the Historic Property shall comply with applicable City plans and regulations, and conform to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation, namely the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation Projects. These guidelines are attached hereto, marked as Exhibit C, and incorporated herein by this reference. Owner shall continually maintain the Historic Property in the same or better condition.
c. A view corridor enabling the general public to see the Historic Property from the public right-of-way shall be maintained, and Owner shall not be permitted to block the view corridor to the property with any new structure, such as walls, fences or shrubbery, so as to prevent the viewing of the historic landmark by the public. d. The following are prohibited: demolition of the Historic Property or destruction of character-defining features of the building or site; removal of trees and other major vegetation unless removal is approved by a rehabilitation plan approved by the Historic Resources Commission; paving of yard surface; exterior alterations or additions unless approved by the Historic Resources Commission and such alterations are in keeping with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards; deteriorating, dilapidated or unrepaired structures such as fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; storage of junk, trash, debris, discarded or unused objects such as cars, appliances, or furniture; and other unsightly by decoration, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition, or inappropriate location. e. Owner shall allow reasonable periodic inspection by prior appointment, as needed or at least every five (5) years after the initial inspection, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by representatives of the City of Santa Ana, the County Assessor, the State Department of Parks and Recreation, and the State Board of Equalization, to determine the Owner’s compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. As part of the periodic inspection, Owner shall supply information in a format determined acceptable by the representatives of the City of Santa Ana, the County Assessor, the State Department of Parks and Recreation, and the State Board of Equalization information required to determine compliance with the terms of this Agreement.
f. Owner shall implement the rehabilitation and restoration work items as discussed in detail in Exhibit D, “Proposed Structure Improvements.” The front door replacement shall be finalized within the first five years of the Mills Act Agreement, with all other work items completed within the first ten years of the Mills Act Agreement. Proof of status and completion, as requested from time to time by the City of Santa Ana, will be required in order to satisfy and maintain the Mills Act Agreement. Staff approval is required before items shall be amended or removed/replaced from the improvements list.

Historic Resources Commission 1 – 14 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 87 1/16/2024

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
1607 North Freeman Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 4 -

4. Furnishing of Information.

The Owner hereby agrees to furnish the City with any and all information requested which may be necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement.

5. Cancellation.
a. The City, following a duly noticed public hearing by the City Council as set forth in Government Code Section 50280, et. seq., may cancel this Agreement if it determines that the Owner have breached any of the conditions of this Agreement, or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified Historic Property, or if the City determines that the Owner have failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in Section 3 of this Agreement. If a contract is cancelled for these reasons, the Owner shall pay a cancellation fee to the County Auditor as set forth in Government Code Section 50286. This cancellation fee shall be a percentage (currently set at twelve and one-half (12 ½) percent by Government Code Section 50286) of the current fair market value of the property at the time of the cancellation, as determined by the county assessor, without regard to any restriction imposed pursuant to this Agreement.
b. If the Historic Property is destroyed by earthquake, fire, flood or other natural disaster such that in the opinion of the City Building Official more than sixty (60) percent of the original fabric of the structure must be replaced, this Agreement shall be canceled immediately because, in effect, the historic value of the structure will have been destroyed. No fee shall be imposed in the case of destruction by acts of God or natural disaster. c. If the Historic Property is acquired by eminent domain and the City Council determines that the acquisition frustrates the purpose of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be cancelled and no fee imposed, as specified in Government Code Section 50288.

6. Enforcement of Agreement.
a. In lieu of and/or in addition to any provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of the Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions to cancel the Agreement by Owner, the City shall give written notice to Owner by registered or certified mail, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager or designee within thirty (30) days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default, or default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default may be commenced within thirty (30) days and shall thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by Owner), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Owner growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Owner or apply for such relief as may be appropriate.

Historic Resources Commission 1 – 15 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 88 1/16/2024

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
1607 North Freeman Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 5 -
b. City does not waive any claim of default by the Owner if City does not enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City’s regulations governing historic properties are available to City to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder.

7. Binding effect of Agreement.
a. Owner hereby subjects the Historic Property, located at 1607 North Freeman Street, Assessor Parcel Number, 405-313-05, and more particularly described in Exhibit A, in the City of Santa Ana, to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement.
b. City and Owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, conditions and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon Owner’s successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic Property. Every contract, deed, or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Historic Property or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the tenants, restrictions, and reservations expressed in this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, conditions and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed, or other instrument.
c. This property is listed in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties (Register). In any real property transaction, the owner of this property or the owner’s representative shall provide the buyer of this property with notice that the property is listed on the City’s historic Register.

8. No Compensation.

Owner shall not receive any payment from City in consideration of the obligation imposed under this Agreement, it being recognized that the consideration for the execution of this Agreement is the substantial public benefit to be derived therefrom and the advantage that will accrue to Owner as a result of the effect upon the assessed value of the Property on the account of the restrictions on the use and preservation of the Property.

9. Notice.

Any notice required by the terms of this Agreement shall be sent to the address of the respective parties as specified below or at other addresses that may be later specified by the parties hereto.

City: City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Attn: Clerk of the Council
Historic Resources Commission 1 – 16 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 89 1/16/2024

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
1607 North Freeman Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 6 -
Owners: Daniel and Robbyn Taylor
1607 North Freeman Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706

10. General Provisions.
a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors, or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions or conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint enterprise.
b. The Owner agrees to and shall indemnify and hold the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of the Owner or those of his or her contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee, or other person acting on his or her behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. The Owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of the Owner's activities in connection with the Historic Property. c. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, and costs of defense incurred, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not City prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Historic Property. d. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns, and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the Historic Property, whether by operation of law on in any manner whatsoever. e. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all reasonable attorney’s fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other relief ordered by the court.
f. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby.
g. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, with venue in Orange County.

Historic Resources Commission 1 – 17 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 90 1/16/2024

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
1607 North Freeman Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 7 -

11. Recordation.

No later than twenty (20) days after the parties execute and enter into this Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Orange.

12. Amendments.

This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto.

13. Effective Date
This Agreement shall be effective on the day and year first written above in Section 1. {Signature page follows}
Historic Resources Commission 1 – 18 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 91 1/16/2024

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
1607 North Freeman Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 8 -
ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA
________________________ _________________________
JENNIFER L. HALL STEVEN A. MENDOZA
City Clerk Acting City Manager
OWNERS
Date: ___________________ By:__________________

DANIEL TAYLOR
Date: ___________________ By:__________________

ROBBYN TAYLOR
APPROVED AS TO FORM: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

SONIA CARVALHO
City Attorney
By: _____________________ _____________________

BRANDON SALVATIERRA MINH THAI
Deputy City Attorney Executive Director
Planning and Building Agency
Historic Resources Commission 1 – 19 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 92 1/16/2024

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
1607 North Freeman Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 9 -

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

LOT 16 OF TRACT NO. 1228, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 38, PAGE(S) 42 OF

MISCELLANEOUS OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY.

Assessor’s Parcel Number: 405-313-05
Historic Resources Commission 1 – 20 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 93 1/16/2024

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Rogers-Mansfield House
1607 North Freeman Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
NAME Rogers-Mansfield House REF. NO.

ADDRESS 1607 North Freeman Street
CITY Santa Ana ZIP 92706 ORANGE COUNTY
YEAR BUILT 1948 LOCAL REGISTER CATEGORY: Key
HISTORIC DISTRICT N/A NEIGHBORHOOD Washington Square
CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION C/3 CALIFORNIA REGISTER STATUS CODE 5S3 Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted
Prehistoric Historic Both
ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Minimal Traditional
During the Great Depression through the immediate postwar years, the Minimal Traditional home rose in popularity as the preferred style for middle-class housing in the United States. This basic house type fulfilled both aesthetic and social needs: in terms of aesthetics, the form represented a stripped-down version of the historic-eclectic styles popular in the 1920s, in particular the Tudor and English Revival styles. In social terms, the Minimal Traditional home satisfied requirements in square footage and plan by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), which launched a campaign in this period to expand home ownership. The Minimal Traditional home served as the prototype used by the FHA in its efforts to codify and manufacture “a standard, low-cost, minimum house that the majority of American wage earners could afford” (Greg Hise, Magnetic Los Angeles, p. 57). Minimal Traditional homes are typically rectangular in plan and onestory in height, often with a front-gabled wing and prominent attached chimney. In contrast with the English and Tudor Revival styles the one-story version mimics, the Minimal Traditional home is capped with a low or intermediate pitch roof with a hipped or side gable. Sheathing materials include stucco, brick, or wood, often accompanied by stone veneer accents. Fenestration generally consists of multi-light casement, double-hung, and picture windows with wood frames.

The eaves and rakes of the Minimal Traditional home are typically shallow (in a departure from the later Ranch House style, which they often resemble). Although they have little applied ornament, many Minimal Traditional homes often display decorative wood shutters and porch-roof supports.

SUMMARY/CONCLUSION:

The Rogers-Mansfield House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Minimal Traditional style home in Santa Ana. The recommended categorization is “Key” because it has a distinctive architectural style and quality reflective of the Minimal Traditional style, along with rare wood shingle siding (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2).

EXPLANATION OF CODES:
 California Register Criteria for Evaluation: (From California Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance Series # 7, “How to Nominate Resources to the California Register of Historical Resources,” September 4, 2001.) 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values.  It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values.
5S3: Appears to be individually eligible for local listing or designation through survey evaluation.

Historic Resources Commission 1 – 21 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 94 1/16/2024
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #______________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #__________________________________________________ PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial______________________________________________ NRHP Status Code_____________________________________
Other Listings_____________________________________________________________________ Review Code________ Reviewer________________________ Date_______________ Page _1_ of _5_ Resource name(s) or number (assigned by recorder) Rogers-Mansfield House P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County Orange County *b. USGS 7.5’ Quad: Orange Quadrangle California-Orange County 7.5-Minute Series Date: 2022 *c. Address 1607 North Freeman Street City: Santa Ana Zip: 92706 *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor’s Parcel Number 405-313-05 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) The Rogers-Mansfield House is a one-story, single-family, Minimal Traditional Style residence located on a modestly sized parcel in Santa Ana’s Washington Square neighborhood (Figure 1). The residence exhibits an L-shaped plan with a mediumpitch roof clad in replacement asphalt shingles and shallow eaves. While primarily side-gabled, a front-gable projects at the primary (west) façade along with a flat front porch roof projection. The exterior of the house is clad in wood shingles. Wood windows with a prominent wood window sill and trim are located on all building facades (Figure 2). (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 5.)
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP2. Single-Family Residence and HP4. Ancillary building *P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other P5b. Photo: (view and date)
(Figure 1) Primary (west) elevation,
view east, August 2023
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: historic
1948/ City of Santa Ana Building
Permits
*P7. Owner and Address:

Daniel and Robbyn Taylor
1607 North Freeman Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
*P8. Recorded by:

Andrea Dumovich Heywood
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza M-20
Santa Ana, CA 92702
*P9. Date Recorded:

November 2, 2023
*P10. Survey Type:

Intensive Survey Update
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey
report and other sources, or enter “none”)
None
*Attachments: None Location Map Sketch Map Continuation Sheet Building, Structure, and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record  Other (list)
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
P5a. Photo
Historic Resources Commission 1 – 22 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 95 1/16/2024
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #__________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#______________________________________________

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD

Page 2 of 5 ends

*Resource Name or #: Rogers-Mansfield House
B1. Historic Name: Rogers-Mansfield House
B2. Common Name: Same
B3. Original Use: Single-family Residence B4. Present Use: Single-family Residence *B5. Architectural Style: Minimal Traditional Style
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations):

April 6, 1948. Permit to construct a five room residence and garage. $10,000.

Unknown date. Front door replacement.
*B7. Moved? No Yes Unknown Date:__________ Original location:_______ _______ *B8. Related Features: Detached garage, front and rear porches, and front yard landscaping with two mature trees B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance: 1948 Property Type: Single-family Residence Applicable Criteria: C/3 (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity) The Rogers-Mansfield House is architecturally significant as an intact example of a Minimal Traditional style house in Santa Ana. According to City building records, it was built in 1948 for approximately $10,000, for Emmet C. Rogers; however, the original architect and builder are unknown. Emmet C. Rogers was a local contractor who sold lots and built homes in Santa Ana. Mr. Rogers only resided at the property for one year or less as John N Mansfield is listed as the owner by 1949. City Directories show Mr. Mansfield owned the property from 1949 until at least 1960. City Directories are unavailable between 1961-1979. Criss-Cross Directories between 1980 - 1998 show the subject address but do not include a property tenant or owner name. By 1999, the subject property was owned by Paul Williamson, who owned the property until at least 2008, the date of the last available directory. The current owners Daniel and Robbyn Taylor have owned and resided in the subject property since 2022. No additional information was uncovered regarding the past owners and tenants. (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 5.)
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References:

City of Santa Ana Building Permits
Santa Ana History Room Collection, Santa Ana Public Library Sanborn Maps
(See Continuation Sheet 3 of 5.)
B13. Remarks: None
*B14. Evaluator: Andrea Dumovich Heywood, City of Santa Ana. *Date of Evaluation: November 2, 2023
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
Sketch Map
(This space reserved for official comments.)
Rogers-Mansfield House
1607 North Freeman Street
N
Historic Resources Commission 1 – 23 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 96 1/16/2024
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________

Page 3 ends

*Recorded by Andrea Dumovich Heywood *Date November 2, 2023 Continuation  Update DPR 523L
*P3a. Description (continued):

The front porch is supported by a single, slender wood post on a raised concrete platform accessible by two concrete steps.

The main entrance, located under the front porch, faces south and is composed of a four panel replacement door with four upper lights (Figure 3).

Fenestration on the primary (west) façade includes three window bays. The front gable displays a large, fixed wood window flanked by two double-hung wood windows with a four-over-four muntin pattern (Figure 4). Along the side-gable of the primary (west) façade is the same double-hung style window and muntin pattern in both paired and singular form. The north, south, and rear (east) façade window pattern is composed of a mix of one-over-one double-hung wood windows and fourover-four double-hung wood windows (Figure 5). The building’s southeast (rear) corner contains a covered porch supported by a slender wood post and a raised concrete platform. A single pedestrian wood door and upper light, located behind a metal security door, is tucked within the rear porch (Figure 6). Additional architectural features include a concrete driveway with a concrete path leading to the front porch, brick chimney at the north (side) façade, as well as vents at the gable ends.

The rear yard contains a single-story, detached garage clad in wood shingle siding to match the main residence. The garage features an asphalt shingle roof, metal roll-up garage door, and a single pedestrian wood door with an operable upper light (Figure 7). The property is landscaped with a front lawn, two mature trees, and rose bushes near the front porch. *B10. Significance (continued):

Santa Ana was founded by William Spurgeon in 1869 as a speculative town site on part of the Spanish land grant known as Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana. The civic and commercial core of the community was centered on the intersection of Main and Fourth Streets. Stimulated by the arrival of the Santa Fe Railroad and incorporation as a city in 1886, and selection as the seat of the newly created County of Orange in 1889, the city grew outwards, with residential neighborhoods developing to the north, south, and east of the city center. Agricultural uses predominated in the outlying areas, with cultivated fields and orchards dotted with widely scattered farmhouses.

The Rogers-Mansfield House is located in Washington Square, a neighborhood located northwest of the city center bounded by West Seventeenth Street on the north, West Civic Center Drive on the south, North Flower Street on the east, and North Bristol Street on the west. Most of this area was owned by the family of Jacob Ross, who had purchased portions of the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana in 1868 and 1869. Walnuts and other crops were grown in the area during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, with a few farmhouses, most notably the Ross-McNeal House at 1020 North Baker Street, dotting the landscape. By 1905, Baker and Towner were the only streets in the neighborhood, which extended from Hickey (now Civic Center) only as far as Washington and which contained only about a dozen homes. The status quo had not changed much by 1915, when a brick yard was located at the northern terminus of Olive Street at Hickey. In 1925, the beginning of the development that would convert this largely agricultural area into a middle class neighborhood of singlefamily homes over the next 25 years had begun. In the late 1920s and early 1930s, the Tudor Revival and Spanish Colonial Revival homes were the standard, with American Colonial Revival saltboxes and ranch style homes favored in the years before and after World War II. During the 1930s, many of the homes were built by local contractor Emmett Rogers, who sold lots and built homes according to standard plans, which individual property owners could customize to their tastes ("Washington Square: A Neighborhood of Pride," Washington Square Neighborhood Association). With the return of servicemen following the war and the accompanying demand for homes in southern California, the development of Washington Square was all but completed.

The Rogers-Mansfield House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1 as an intact example of a Minimal Traditional style home in Santa Ana. Located in Washington Square, the house cost $10,000 to build in 1948. The recommended categorization is “Key” because it has a distinctive architectural style and quality reflective of the Minimal Traditional style, along with rare wood shingle siding (Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2). Characterdefining features of the Rogers-Mansfield House include, but may not be limited to: L-shaped plan; single-story massing; side-gable body with prominent front-gable; medium-pitch roof with shallow eaves; wood shingle siding; original wood windows with a prominent wood window sill and trim are located on all building facades; front and rear porch, each supported by a single wood post located on a raised concrete platform; main entrance located within front porch; brick chimney; overall lack of ornamentation; front yard lawn with landscaping including two mature trees; and a detached garage featuring wood shingle siding and a single pedestrian door with operable light. *B12. References (continued):

Almendral, Dylan M. “The Home of Dynasties: Historic Home Profile.” My Blog. 12 January 2020. Available:
https://www.dylanmalmendral.com/blog/the-home-of-dynasties. Accessed: 1 February 2023.

Historic Resources Commission 1 – 24 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 97 1/16/2024
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________

Page 4 ends

Harris, Cyril M. American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia. New York, WW Norton, 1998.

Marsh, Diann. Santa Ana, An Illustrated History. Encinitas, Heritage Publishing, 1994.

McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984.

Office of Historic Preservation. “Instructions for Recording Historical Resources.” Sacramento: March 1995.

Whiffen, Marcus. American Architecture Since 1780. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1969.

Santa Ana and Orange County Directories, 1948-2008.

Talbert, Thomas B. The Historical Volume and Reference Works: Covering Garden Grove, Santa Ana, Tustin. Volume 1:

Orange County. Whittier: Historical Publishers, 1963.

Historic Resources Commission 1 – 25 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 98 1/16/2024
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________

Page 5 ends

*Recorded by Andrea Dumovich Heywood *Date November 2, 2023 Continuation  Update DPR 523L
Additional Figures:

Figure 2. The exterior of the house is clad in wood shingles.

Wood windows with a prominent wood window sill and trim are located on all building facades, facing east.

Figure 3. The front porch, featuring the main entrance, is supported by a single wood post on a raised concrete
platform accessible by two concrete steps, facing north.

Figure 4. The primary (west) façade features a large, fixed wood window flanked by two double-hung wood windows with a four-over-four muntin pattern , facing southeast.

Figure 5. The south (side) façade features windows
composed of four-over-four double-hung wood windows
and one-over-one double-hung wood windows, facing
north.

Figure 6. The bbuilding’s southeast (rear) corner contains a covered porch supported by a slender wood post and a raised concrete platform, facing northwest.

Historic Resources Commission 1 – 26 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 99 1/16/2024

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
1607 North Freeman Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 1 -
Exhibit C
Exterior work shall be reviewed by the Historic Resources Commission and subject to the U.S.

Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, as follows:

4. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site and its environment.

These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected.

5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site shall be treated with sensitivity.

8. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and reserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to any project.

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
1607 North Freeman Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 2 -
size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment.

Historic Resources Commission 1 – 28 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 101 1/16/2024
Proposed Structure Improvements (“Work Plan”)
1607 North Freeman Street
Item Year Improvement
1 2024 Replace non-original front door and front entrance light with period appropriate door and light.
2 2024 Replace rear, security screen door with period appropriate screen door.
3 2024 Update bathroom with new plumbing, add light fixtures, replace shower with glass shower door, and new tile.
4 2028 Potentially add new bathroom addition to rear
5 2030 Possible reroof, asses by 2025 if needed
6 Ongoing
throughout
duration of
contract

1. Exterior wood shingle siding maintenance/repair

2. Maintain original wood windows as needed
Historic Resources Commission 1 – 29 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 102 1/16/2024

O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R
OR#
~SINCE 1921~
To the right is a copy of the notice you sent to us for publication in the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER. Thank you for using our newspaper. Please read this notice carefully and call us with any corrections. The Proof of Publication will be filed with the County Clerk, if required, and mailed to you after the last date below. Publication date(s) for this notice is (are):

Daily Journal Corporation
Serving your legal advertising needs throughout California.

Mailing Address : 600 W SANTA ANA BLVD STE 812, SANTA ANA, CA 92701 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841
Visit us @ www.LegalAdstore.com

NUVIA OCAMPO

CITY OF SANTA ANA/PLANNING & BUILDING AGENCY
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA 2ND FLR
SANTA ANA, CA 92702

GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE
1607 N Freeman
10/23/2023
Publication
Total
$128.70
$128.70
ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, SANTA ANA (714) 543-2027
BUSINESS JOURNAL, RIVERSIDE (951) 784-0111
DAILY COMMERCE, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300
LOS ANGELES DAILY JOURNAL, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300
SAN FRANCISCO DAILY JOURNAL, SAN FRANCISCO (800) 640-4829 SAN JOSE POST-RECORD, SAN JOSE (408) 287-4866
THE DAILY RECORDER, SACRAMENTO (916) 444-2355
THE DAILY TRANSCRIPT, SAN DIEGO (619) 232-3486
THE INTER-CITY EXPRESS, OAKLAND (510) 272-4747
Notice Type:

Ad Description

COPY OF NOTICE
3750494
!A000006434974!
The charge(s) for this order is as follows. An invoice will be sent after the last date of publication. If you prepaid this order in full, you will not receive an invoice.

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

BEFORE THE SANTA ANA HISTORIC

RESOURCES COMMISSION
The City of Santa Ana encourages the
public to participate in the decisionmaking process. We encourage you to contact us prior to the Public Hearing if
you have any questions.

Historic Resources Commission
Action: The Historic Resources
Commission will hold a Public Hearing to
receive public testimony, and will take
action on the item described below. Their
decision is final unless appealed to the
City Council within 10 days of the decision
by any interested party or group.

Project Location: 1607 Freeman Lane
located within the Single Family
Residence (R1) Zoning District.

Project Applicant: Robbyn & Daniel
Taylor
Project Description: The applicants are
requesting approval of Historic Resources
Commission Application No. 2023-18,
Historic Register Categorization No. 2023-
05, and Historic Property Preservation
Agreement No. 2023-11, to allow the
placement and categorization in the Santa
Ana Register of Historical Properties as
“Key” for the above mentioned property
and to execute a Mills Act agreement with
the City of Santa Ana.

Environmental Impact:Pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the
project is exempt from further review
under Section 15331, Class 31, as this
action is designed to preserve a historic
resource. Categorical Exemption No. ER2023-107 will be filed for this project.

Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Thursday, November 2, 2023, at 4:30 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa
Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public
may attend this meeting in-person or
join via Zoom. For the most up to date
information on how to participate virtually
in this meeting, please visit www.santaana.org/pb/meeting-participation. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send
written comments by e-mail to
[email protected]
(reference the topic in the subject line) or
mail to Nuvia Ocampo, Recording
Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic
Center Plaza – M20, Santa Ana, CA
92701. Deadline to submit written comments is 3:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the
record.

Where To Get More Information:

Additional details regarding the proposed
action(s), including the full text of the
discretionary item, may be found on the
City website 72 hours prior to the public
hearing at: https://santaana.primegov.com/public/portal.

Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any questions, please contact Andrea Dumovich Heywood with the
Planning and Building Agency at
[email protected] or 714-647-
5899. You can also contact Pedro Gomez
with the Planning and Building Agency at
[email protected] or 714-667-
2790.

Note:If you challenge the decision on the
above matter, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the Historic
Resources Commission or City Council of
the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the
public hearing.

Si tiene preguntas en español, favor de
llamar a Nuvia Ocampo al (714) 667-
2732.

Nu cn liên lc bng ting Vit, xin
in thoi cho Tony Lai s (714) 565-
2627.
10/23/23
OR-3750494#
Historic Resources Commission 1 – 30 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 103 1/16/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Planning and Building Agency
20 Civic Center Plaza ● P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, California 92702
www.santa-ana.org/pba

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

BEFORE THE SANTA ANA HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION
Historic Resources Commission Action: The Historic Resources Commission will hold a Public Hearing to receive public testimony, and will take action on the item described below. Their decision is final unless appealed to the City Council within 10 days of the decision by any interested party or group.

Project Location: 1607 Freeman Lane located within the Single Family Residence (R1) Zoning District.

Project Applicant: Robbyn & Daniel Taylor
Project Description: The applicants are requesting approval of Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2023-18, Historic Register Categorization No. 2023-05, and Historic Property Preservation Agreement No. 2023-11, to allow the placement and categorization in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties as “Key” for the above mentioned property and to execute a Mills Act agreement with the City of Santa Ana.

Environmental Impact: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is exempt from further review under Section 15331, Class 31, as this action is designed to preserve a historic resource. Categorical Exemption No. ER-2023-107 will be filed for this project.

Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to [email protected] (reference the topic in the subject line) or mail to Nuvia Ocampo, Recording Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza – M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701.

Deadline to submit written comments is 3:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the record.

Where To Get More Information: Additional details regarding the proposed action(s), including the full text of the discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing at: https://santa-ana.primegov.com/public/portal.

Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any questions, please contact Andrea Dumovich Heywood with the Planning and Building Agency at [email protected] or 714-647-5899. You can also contact Pedro Gomez with the Planning and Building Agency at [email protected] or 714-667-2790.

Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence Historic Resources Commission 1 – 31 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 104 1/16/2024
delivered to the Historic Resources Commission or City Council of the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the public hearing.

Si tiene preguntas en español, favor de llamar a Nuvia Ocampo al (714) 667-2732.

Nếu cần liên lạc bằng tiếng Việt, xin điện thoại cho Tony Lai số (714) 565-2627.

Historic Resources Commission 1 – 32 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 105 1/16/2024
Historic Resources Commission 1 – 33 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 106 1/16/2024
Historic Resources Commission 1 – 34 11/2/2023
City Council 22 – 107 1/16/2024
Police Department
www.santa-ana.org/police
Item # 23
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
January 16, 2024
TOPIC: Automated Parking Citation and Processing Services

AGENDA TITLE
Approve a First Amendment to Agreement with Data Ticket, Inc. (General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute the first amendment to the agreement with Data Ticket, Inc. for automated parking citation and processing services for an additional amount of $730,351.69, for a total aggregate amount not to exceed $2,000,000 for the remaining term of the agreement expiring February 14, 2025 (Agreement No. A-2024- XXX).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

DISCUSSION
In February 2022, the City Council approved a three-year agreement with Data Ticket, Inc. after a competitive Request for Proposal process to provide automated parking citation and processing services on behalf of the Traffic Division of the Santa Ana Police Department. Data Ticket, Inc.’s services include managing the parking citation database, sending out daily notices for payment collection, and hosting a full-service, bilingual customer service call center that allows motorists to obtain general information regarding the citation process and specific information on particular citations. Data Ticket, Inc. has been the City’s provider of these services since 2017 and continues to perform in a professional and competent manner.

The original term of the agreement covers the three-year period of February 2022 through February 2025, with two one-year extension options. Based on the current fee trajectory, the projected total expenditures will exceed the total budgeted aggregate cost payable to Data Ticket for collection by next month.

The original agreement budgeted costs were based on California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) and Data Ticket delinquency collections data from 2020 and 2021, during the height of the pandemic. Throughout calendar year 2022 and 2023, the City has experienced a consistent and higher degree of individuals failing to pay their citations timely, resulting in an increase in collections through FTB and Data Ticket’s delinquency City Council 23 – 1 1/16/2024
Automated Parking Citation and Processing Services
January 16, 2024

Page 2 ends

program. This trend has been consistent to date and the increased monthly costs are directly attributable to the increased collection efforts.

The original agreement also included automatic and immediate increases in the fees for letters and notices sent via the United States Postal Service (USPS) if postal rates increased during the term of the agreement. Since February 2022, the USPS has announced four price increases totaling an additional ten cents per First-Class Mail.

The amendment for the additional $730,352 will be sufficient to cover the increased fees through the end of the initial three-year period ending in February 2025. The total threeyear agreement not-to-exceed amount will increase from $1,269,648 to $2,000,000. If the vendor continues to perform well, a future amendment to the agreement will be brought before City Council for consideration of the first one-year extension and corresponding increase in the contract authority.

FISCAL IMPACT
The current fiscal year funding is available in the FY 2023-24 budget and future fiscal year funding will be included in the proposed budgets for City Council consideration as follows:

Fiscal Year Accounting Unit
– Account No.

Fund
Description
Accounting Unit –
Account No.

Description
Amount
FY 23-24
(Jan.-June) 01114405-62300 General Fund
Traffic Division,
Contract ServicesProfessional$295,000
FY 23-24
(Jan.-June) 02718131-62300 Parking Fund
Parking Meter,
Contract ServicesProfessional$ 5,000
FY 24-25
(July-Feb.) 01114405-62300 General Fund
Traffic Division,
Contract ServicesProfessional$390,000
FY 24-25
(July-Feb.) 02718131-62300 Parking Fund
Parking Meter,
Contract ServicesProfessional$ 40,352
Total $730,352
The amounts above are estimated projections and are subject to change.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. First Amendment with Data Ticket
Submitted By: Robert Rodriguez, Acting Police Chief
Approved By: Tom Hatch, Interim City Manager
City Council 23 – 2 1/16/2024
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH DATA TICKET, INC. TO

PROVIDE AUTOMATED PARKING CITATION PROCESSING
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (“First Amendment”) to Agreement with Data Ticket, Inc. to Provide Automated Parking Citation Processing is entered into on January 16, 2024, by and between Data Ticket Inc., a California corporation (“Contractor”), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (“City”). The Contractor and City shall hereinafter be referred to collectively as “the Parties.”

RECITALS
A. On February 15, 2022, the Parties entered into Agreement #A-2022-022 (“Agreement”), by which Contractor agreed to agreed to provide automated parking citation and processing services. The original term of the agreement covers a 3-year period from February 2022 through January 2025, with two one-year extension options. The not to exceed amount to be expended during the term of the Agreement was $1,269, 648.31.

B. Throughout calendar year 2022 and 2023, the City has experienced a consistent and higher degree of individuals failing to pay their citations timely, resulting in an increase in collections through FTB and Data Ticket’s delinquency program. This trend has been consistent to date and the increased monthly costs are directly attributable to the increased collection efforts.

C. The Agreement included automatic and immediate increases in the fees for letters and notices sent via the United States Postal Service (USPS) if postal rates increased during the term of the agreement.

D. Additional funds are now needed to cover costs for the remaining term of the Agreement. The Parties now wish to amend the Agreement to increase the compensation by an additional $730,351.69 to cover costs for the remaining term of the Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement, except as hereinafter modified, the Parties agree to the following:

1. Section 2, Compensation, shall be amended to increase the compensation for services provided under this Agreement by $730,351.69. The total amount to be expended during the term of this Agreement shall not exceed $2,000,000.

2. Exhibit B attached to the Agreement shall be amended to reflect the automated parking citation and purchase charges as set forth in the new Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein.

3. Except as modified by this First Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect.

EXHIBIT 1
City Council 23 – 3 1/16/2024
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written.

ATTEST:
_______________________
JENNIFER L. HALL
City Clerk

CITY OF SANTA ANA
_______________________
THOMAS R. HATCH
Interim City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney
By: _______________________

TAMARA BOGOSIAN
Senior Assistant City Attorney
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
________________________

ROBERT RODRIGUEZ
Acting Chief of Police
DATA TICKET, INC.
_______________________
By:

City Council 23 – 4 1/16/2024
Data Ticket, Inc. City of Santa Ana
Irvine, CA RFP NO. 21-128
O: 949 752-6937; O: 949 428-7240 Automated Parking Citation and Processing Services Attachment A: Proposer’s Certification & Proposal Item Pricing

EXHIBIT B
City Council 23 – 5 1/16/2024
Data Ticket, Inc. City of Santa Ana
Irvine, CA RFP NO. 21-128
O: 949 752-6937; O: 949 428-7240 Automated Parking Citation and Processing Services Additional, optional pricing has been provided below and on the following pages.

Joint/Escrow Banking Services $135.00 per account per month ($85 +$50 as of January 2023 for Positive Pay)
Services for the above-mentioned item include:
• Daily deposits of funds to the Agency’s escrow account • Online, real-time reconciliation reports that tie directly to the bank statement • Processing of all credit card chargebacks and Insufficient Funds • Month-end reconciliation of all funds collected
• Disbursement of County / State Surcharges at month-end • Payment of Data Ticket’s invoice
• Disbursement of the net remittance to the Agency
• Scanning of all payments directly to joint bank account daily using remote check deposit • The Agency will be responsible for the purchase of banking supplies, including checks and endorsement stamps; these fees typically run $200.00 per year Chargebacks and NSF’s $2.50 per issued instance
• Data Ticket will process credit card chargebacks and NSFs when notified of each occurrence
• Once processed, Data Ticket will send a custom letter to the individual detailing the returned item and the amount due on the citation
Refunds $2.60 per issued instance
• Data Ticket will process refunds when notified of each need • In the event the city utilizes Joint Banking, Data Ticket will verify, generate, and send each refund due
• Refunds will be issued weekly
• Refunds will be sent via 1st Class Mail
City Council 23 – 6 1/16/2024
Data Ticket, Inc. City of Santa Ana
Irvine, CA RFP NO. 21-128
O: 949 752-6937; O: 949 428-7240 Automated Parking Citation and Processing Services • The anticipated costs for the city to issue refunds to individuals is expected to be $24,000 per year. These funds are furnished by the city to Data Ticket to replenish the city’s refund account.

Delinquency Collections Program 20% of amount collected • Delinquent collections include sending an additional three notices per citation, handling all customer service and processing all payments. The estimated cost of the program is $151,375 (20%) per year based on $756,877 in collections in the prior year.

Parking Citation Payment Plan Processing (non-indigent) $12.00 per transaction • An administrative fee will be assessed to Patrons who wish to participate in a payment plan
• The administrative fee will be added to the Agency’s invoice and once the 1st payment plan installment is paid by the Patron, the administrative fee will be reimbursed to the Agency
• This fee will cover the cost of the payment plan initiation, and the cost of a confirmation letter that is sent to the Patron confirming the details of the payment plan • The Agency will have the ability to determine whether Payment Plans are accepted and if so, what the parameters for payment will be
Payment Plan Administration (AB 503 – indigent) $6.10 per transaction • Acceptance and scanning of Indigent payment plan requests • Approval/Denial by Data Ticket
• Inclusive of the approval/denial letter
Credit Card Chargeback Processing $30.00 per transaction • If a chargeback occurs, a fee will be charged to the Patron for the processing of the chargeback
• No fee will be charged to the Agency
Postal Rate Increase Offset – If postal rates increase during the term of the agreement, fees to DTI shall be raised immediately to offset the effect of the actual postal rate increase.

DETAILED ANDROID PRICING
3 Year Lease Price
Samsung Galaxy A52+ & New 3” Printer $39.00 per unit per month OR
Purchase Price
Samsung Galaxy A52+ & 3” Printer $1,277.00 per unit
The city states it would like to proceed with the existing printers utilized by the city.

If so, we have provided Lease and Purchase prices below for the handheld ticket writers only below.

City Council 23 – 7 1/16/2024
Data Ticket, Inc. City of Santa Ana
Irvine, CA RFP NO. 21-128
O: 949 752-6937; O: 949 428-7240 Automated Parking Citation and Processing Services 3 Year Lease Price
Samsung Galaxy A52+ $30.00 per unit per month
OR
Purchase Price
Samsung Galaxy A52+ $1,000.00 per unit
Handheld Software Licensing $100.00 per unit per year
This fee covers all software licensing and upgrades provided to the city.

Handheld Software Maintenance $25.00 per unit per month This fee covers complete repair and replacement of any handheld unit damaged for any reason. There is no deductible charged to the city. Upon notification of damage, we simply prepare a unit to be FedEx’d to the City for replacement.

Data Plan ~$45.00 per unit per month
This fee will be a passed through from the selected cellular provider.

City Council 23 – 8 1/16/2024
Police Department
www.santa-ana.org/police
Item # 24
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
January 16, 2024
TOPIC: Enterprise Fleet Management Lease Agreements

AGENDA TITLE
Agreements with Enterprise Fleet Management for Leased Vehicles (General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute the following seven agreements with Enterprise FM Trust and Enterprise Fleet Mangement, Inc. for leased vehicles for the period of January 1, 2024 through April 18, 2026 for a total annual amount not to exceed $612,936, with a one-year extension option:

1. Master Walkaway Lease Agreement (Agreement No. A- 2024-XXX);

2. Master Equity Lease Agreement (Agreement No. A- 2024-XXX);

3. Maintenance Management and Fleet Rental Agreement (Agreement No. A2024-XXX);

4. Supplemental Agreement between City and Enterprise (Agreement No. A- 2024- XXX);

5. Indemnity Agreement for Master Walkaway Lease Agreement (Agreement No. A2024-XXX);

6. Indemnity Agreement for Master Equity Lease Agreement (Agreement No. A2024-XXX);

7. Amendment to Maintenance Management and Fleet Rental Agreement (Agreement No. A- 2024-XXX).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes
City Council 24 – 1 1/16/2024
Enterprise Fleet Management Lease Agreements
January 16, 2024

Page 2 ends

DISCUSSION
The Santa Ana Police Department (SAPD) leases vehicles for various personnel based on need for field assignments. The Police Department currently leases vehicles for the Investigations Bureau, which includes the Vice, Narcotics, Career Criminal, and other specialized units and task forces that are involved in surveillance programs. Leasing a variety of vehicles allows them to be interchanged in order to maintain anonymity and safety of the undercover officers. Homicide and other criminal investigation detectives are provided with lease vehicles to conduct investigations. Additionally, vehicles are leased and assigned to background investigators, police commanders, and various staff within the Training/Human Resources Division, Chief’s Office, and Field Operations.

The City provides take home vehicles for certain positions as contractually obligated in the Memorandum of Understanding with the Santa Ana Police Management Association. A current list of SAPD leases is included in Exhibit 8.

Procurement of City vehicles through the Fleet Division can take as long as 12 to 24 months. This is because in order to provide the best pricing, dealers often base theirs bids on future factory order vehicles with incentives and rebates; hence the long delay from the start of the procurement process, Council approval of the contract award, to delivery of the vehicles. Furthermore, current City policy requires departments to have funds available in the budget for the acquisition cost of a vehicle, as well as the prorated equipment replacement value of the vehicle. The Police Department’s budget is not allocated sufficient funds for the outright purchase of new vehicles so the open-ended lease structure from Enterprise allows the City to replace vehicles with less upfront capital.

The Planning and Building Agency (PBA) leases eighteen vehicles to assist with Code Enforcement, Building Inspection, and Cannabis Enforcement activities. Ongoing delays in the procurement process to purchase vehicles makes it necessary for these continued lease agreements. The need of lease vehicles is necessary to maintain building inspection capacity for current and future large development projects, maintain adequate service levels, and to continue enforcement services for on-going proactive efforts within the community to protect public health, safety and welfare, enforcing city codes related to nuisance and land use violations.

Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS-3041 authorizes the City to purchase against contracts awarded by any public agency employing a competitive bid process. Sourcewell, a cooperative government purchasing agency, awarded a contract to Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. (Contract No. 030122-EFM) for procurement of fleet management services, open-end leases, maintenance management programs, etc., as a result of open, competitive bidding on behalf of its members, which includes government agencies. Utilizing Sourcewell’s contract enables the City to enter into new agreements with Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. (Enterprise) and obtain the best pricing and allows both SAPD and PBA to continue with the existing lease vehicles that are currently under contract.

City Council 24 – 2 1/16/2024
Enterprise Fleet Management Lease Agreements
January 16, 2024

Page 3 ends

Staff recommends both the master walkaway and equity lease agreements, in order to have a variety of options available to meet the needs of the departments in terms of lease terms, monthly lease total, and available budgets. The maintenance management program agreement also provides options for SAPD to participate in this program for the monthly fee of $6 per vehicle, plus the cost of approved routine maintenance and repairs, in lieu of utilizing the City’s fleet services.

The Sourcewell’s contract with Enterprise expires April 18, 2026 and may be extended for one additional year upon the request of Sourcewell and written agreement by Enterprise. If this agreement is extended, staff requests the City’s agreement with Enterprise also be extended for the same one year period, upon written agreement by both parties.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding is available in the FY 2023-24 budget in the following accounts for the January through June 2024 lease payments:

Police Department
Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit –
Account No.

Fund
Description
Accounting Unit –
Account No.

Description
Amount
FY 23-24 01114XXX-62300 General Fund
Police Department
Various, Contract
ServicesProfessional
$230,268
FY 23-24 01214010-62300 Cannabis Fund
Police Enforcement
Services, Contract
ServicesProfessional
$30,000
Total $260,268
Planning & Building Agency
Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit –
Account No.

Fund
Description
Accounting Unit –
Account No.

Description
Amount
FY 23-24 01116XXX-62300 General Fund
Planning and
Building Agency
Various, Contract
ServicesProfessional
$28,800
FY 23-24 01216010-62300 Cannabis Fund
Enforcement
Services, Contract
ServicesProfessional
$17,400
Total $46,200
City Council 24 – 3 1/16/2024
Enterprise Fleet Management Lease Agreements
January 16, 2024

Page 4 ends

The amounts above are estimates and subject to change, pending registration renewals, routine maintenance and repairs, and other fees. Funding for subsequent fiscal years, as well as the extension option if exercised, will be included in the proposed budgets for City Council consideration.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Master Walkaway Lease Agreement

2. Master Equity Lease Agreement

3. Maintenance Management and Fleet Rental Agreement

4. Supplemental Agreement between City and Enterprise

5. Indemnity Agreement for Master Walkaway Lease Agreement

6. Indemnity Agreement for Master Equity Lease Agreement

7. Amendment to Maintenance Management and Fleet Rental Agreement

8. Current Police Department Leases
Submitted By: Robert Rodriguez, Acting Police Chief
Minh Thai, Executive Director of Planning and Building Agency Approved By: Tom Hatch, Interim City Manager
City Council 24 – 4 1/16/2024
16th January 24
EXHIBIT 1
City Council 24 – 5 1/16/2024
City Council 24 – 6 1/16/2024
City Council 24 – 7 1/16/2024
City Council 24 – 8 1/16/2024
Upon the occurrence of any Event of Default, Lessor, without notice to Lessee, will have the right to exercise concurrently or separately (and without any election of remedies being deemed made), the following remedies: (a) Lessor may demand and receive immediate possession of any or all of the Vehicles from Lessee, without releasing Lessee from its obligations under this Agreement; if Lessee fails to surrender possession of the Vehicles to Lessor on default (or termination or expiration of the Term), Lessor, Servicer, any other agent of Lessor and any of Lessor's independent contractors shall have the right to enter upon any premises where the Vehicles may be located and to remove and repossess the Vehicles; (b) Lessor may enforce performance by Lessee of its obligations under this Agreement; (c) Lessor may recover damages and expenses sustained by Lessor, Servicer, any other agent of Lessor or any of their respective successors or assigns by reason of Lessee's default including, to the extent permitted by applicable law, all costs and expenses, including court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses, incurred by Lessor, Servicer, any other agent of Lessor or any of their respective successors or assigns in attempting or effecting enforcement of Lessor's rights under this Agreement (whether or not litigation is commenced) and/or in connection with bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings; (d) upon written notice to Lessee, Lessor may terminate Lessee's rights under this Agreement; (e) with respect to each Vehicle, Lessor may recover from Lessee (i) either the Vehicle (in the condition required by Section 4) or the estimated undamaged wholesale value of the Vehicle (as determined by Lessor in good faith) plus (ii) all accrued and unpaid rent for such Vehicle for the period ending on, and all other amounts owed by Lessee with respect to such Vehicle as of, the date all of the amounts owed by Lessee to Lessor under this clause (e) (including the amounts owed under this subclause (i)) are paid in full (the "Payment Date") plus (iii) an amount equal to three (3) months rent plus (iv) Thirty Percent (30%) of the total future rent due under the applicable Schedule for the period commencing on the Payment Date and ending on the last day of the scheduled Term; and/or (f) Lessor may exercise any other right or remedy which may be available to Lessor under the Uniform Commercial Code, any other applicable law or in equity. A termination of this Agreement shall occur only upon written notice by Lessor to Lessee. Any termination shall not affect Lessee's obligation to pay all amounts due for periods prior to the effective date of such termination or Lessee's obligation to pay any indemnities under this Agreement. All remedies of Lessor under this Agreement or at law or in equity are cumulative.

15. ASSIGNMENTS: Lessor may from time to time assign, pledge or transfer this Agreement and/or any or all of its rights and obligations under this Agreement to any person or entity. Lessee agrees, upon notice of any such assignment, pledge or transfer of any amounts due or to become due to Lessor under this Agreement to pay all such amounts to such assignee, pledgee or transferee. Any such assignee, pledgee or transferee of any rights or obligations of Lessor under this Agreement will have all of the rights and obligations that have been assigned to it. Lessee's rights and interest in and to the Vehicles are and will continue at all times to be subject and subordinate in all respects to any assignment, pledge or transfer now or hereafter executed by Lessor with or in favor of any such assignee, pledgee or transferee, provided that Lessee shall have the right of quiet enjoyment of the Vehicles so long as no Event of Default under this Agreement has occurred and is continuing. Lessee acknowledges and agrees that the rights of any assignee, pledgee or transferee in and to any amounts payable by the Lessee under any provisions of this Agreement shall be absolute and unconditional and shall not be subject to any abatement whatsoever, or to any defense, setoff, counterclaim or recoupment whatsoever, whether by reason of any damage to or loss or destruction of any Vehicle or by reason of any defect in or failure of title of the Lessor or interruption from whatsoever cause in the use, operation or possession of any Vehicle, or by reason of any indebtedness or liability howsoever and whenever arising of the Lessor or any of its affiliates to the Lessee or to any other person or entity, or for any other reason.

Without the prior written consent of Lessor, Lessee may not assign, sublease, transfer or pledge this Agreement, any Vehicle, or any interest in this Agreement or in and to any Vehicle, or permit its rights under this Agreement or any Vehicle to be subject to any lien, charge or encumbrance. Lessee's interest in this Agreement is not assignable and cannot be assigned or transferred by operation of law. Lessee will not transfer or relinquish possession of any Vehicle (except for the sole purpose of repair or service of such Vehicle) without the prior written consent of Lessor.

16. MISCELLANEOUS: This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties. This Agreement may only be amended or modified by an instrument in writing executed by both parties. Lessor shall not by any act, delay, omission or otherwise be deemed to have waived any of its rights or remedies under this Agreement and no waiver whatsoever shall be valid unless in writing and signed by Lessor and then only to the extent therein set forth. A waiver by Lessor of any right or remedy under this Agreement on any one occasion shall not be construed as a bar to any right or remedy, which Lessor would otherwise have on any future occasion. If any term or provision of this Agreement or any application of any such term or provision is invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement and any other application of such term or provision will not be affected thereby. Without Lessor's prior written consent, Lessee shall not use or include Lessor's, Servicer's, any other agent of Lessor's names or trademarks orally or in writing in any media, customer lists or marketing materials. Giving of all notices under this Agreement will be sufficient if mailed by certified mail to a party at its address set forth below or at such other address as such party may provide in writing from time to time. Any such notice mailed to such address will be effective one (1) day after deposit in the United States mail, duly addressed, with certified mail, postage prepaid. Lessee will promptly notify Lessor of any change in Lessee's address. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts (including facsimile and pdf counterparts), but the counterpart marked "ORIGINAL" by Lessor will be the original lease for purposes of applicable law. All of the representations, warranties, covenants, agreements and obligations of each Lessee under this Agreement (if more than one) are joint and several.

17. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS; GOVERNING LAW: Subject to the provisions of Section 15, this Agreement will be binding upon Lessee and its heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns, and will inure to the benefit of Lessor, Servicer, any other agent of Lessor and their respective successors and assigns. This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the substantive laws of the State of California (determined without reference to conflict of law principles).

18. NON-PETITION: Each party hereto hereby covenants and agrees that, prior to the date which is one year and one day after payment in full of all indebtedness of Lessor, it shall not institute against, or join any other person in instituting against, Lessor any bankruptcy, reorganization, arrangement, insolvency or liquidation proceedings or other similar proceeding under the laws of the United States or any state of the United States. The provisions of this Section 18 shall survive termination of this Master Walkaway Lease Agreement.

Initials: EFM ____ Customer ___ _
City Council 24 – 9 1/16/2024

19. NON-APPROPRIATION: Lessee's funding of this Agreement shall be on a Fiscal Year basis and is subject to annual appropriations. Lessor acknowledges that Lessee is a municipal corporation, is precluded by the County or State Constitution and other laws from entering into obligations that financially bind future governing bodies, and that, therefore, nothing in this Agreement shall constitute an obligation of future legislative bodies of the County or State to appropriate funds for purposes of this Agreement. Accordingly, the parties agree that the lease terms within this Agreement or any Schedules relating hereto are contingent upon appropriation of funds. The parties further agree that should the County or State fail to appropriate such funds, the Lessor shall be paid all rentals due and owing hereunder up until the actual day of termination. In addition, Lessor reserves the right to be paid for any reasonable damages. These reasonable damages will be limited to the losses incurred by the Lessor for having to sell the vehicles on the open used car market prior to the end of the scheduled term (as determined in Section 3 and Section 14 of this Agreement).

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Lessor and Lessee have duly executed this Master Walkaway Lease Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

LESSOR: Enterprise FM Trust
LESSEE: ____________________ _
By: Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. its attorney in fact Signature: ________________________ _ Signature:

By: By:

Title: Title:

Address: Address:

Date Signed: ________________ _______ _ Date Signed:

Initials: EFM ____ Customer ___ _
© 2023 Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc 23_ENT_EFM_l01464_Gov Walkaway Form_Updated See Attached Signature Page
City Council 24 – 10 1/16/2024
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written.

CITY OF SANTA ANA
_______________________
THOMAS R. HATCH
Interim City Manager
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
________________________

ROBERT RODRIGUEZ
Acting Chief of Police
ATTEST:
_______________________
JENNIFER L. HALL
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney
By: _______________________

TAMARA BOGOSIAN
Senior Assistant City Attorney
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
________________________

MINH THAI
Executive Director
Planning and Building
City Council 24 – 11 1/16/2024
16th 24
January
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 24 – 12 1/16/2024
City Council 24 – 13 1/16/2024
City Council 24 – 14 1/16/2024
City Council 24 – 15 1/16/2024
if the validity or enforceability of any such guaranty shall be contested or denied by any guarantor, or if any guarantor shall deny that it, he or she has any further liability or obligation under any such guaranty or if any guarantor shall fail to comply with or observe any of the terms, provisions or conditions contained in any such guaranty; (f) the occurrence of a material adverse change in the financial condition, a going concern audit comment of Lessee or any guarantor, or if Lessee admits that it cannot pay its debts as they become due, makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, is the subject of a voluntary or involuntary petition for bankruptcy, is adjudged insolvent or bankrupt, or a receiver or trustee is appointed for any portion of Lessee's assets or property; (g) if more than one (1) payment by Lessee to Lessor is returned by Lessee's bank for any reason within a twelve (12) month period; or (h) if Lessee or any guarantor is in default under or fails to comply with any other present or future agreement with or in favor of Lessor, Servicer of Lessor, or any direct or indirect subsidiary of Servicer of Lessor, Enterprise Holdings, Inc. or a subsidiary or affiliate of Enterprise Holdings, Inc .. For purposes of this Section 14, the term "guarantor" shall mean any present or future guarantor of all or any portion of the obligations of Lessee under this Agreement.

Upon the occurrence of any Event of Default, Lessor, without notice to Lessee, will have the right to exercise concurrently or separately (and without any election of remedies being deemed made), the following remedies: (a) Lessor may demand and receive immediate possession of any or all of the Vehicles from Lessee, without releasing Lessee from its obligations under this Agreement; if Lessee fails to surrender possession of the Vehicles to Lessor on default (or termination or expiration of the Term), Lessor, Servicer, any other agent of Lessor and any of Lessor's independent contractors shall have the right to enter upon any premises where the Vehicles may be located and to remove and repossess the Vehicles; (b) Lessor may enforce performance by Lessee of its obligations under this Agreement; (c) Lessor may recover damages and expenses sustained by Lessor, Servicer, any other agent of Lessor or any of their respective successors or assigns by reason of Lessee's default including, to the extent permitted by applicable law, all costs and expenses, including court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses, incurred by Lessor, Servicer, any other agent of Lessor or any of their respective successors or assigns in attempting or effecting enforcement of Lessor's rights under this Agreement (whether or not litigation is commenced) and/or in connection with bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings; (d) upon written notice to Lessee, Lessor may terminate Lessee's rights under this Agreement; (e) with respect to each Vehicle, Lessor may recover from Lessee all amounts owed by Lessee under Sections 3(b) and 3(c) of this Agreement (and, if Lessor does not recover possession of a Vehicle, (i) the estimated wholesale value of such Vehicle for purposes of Section 3(c) shall be deemed to be $0.00 and (ii) the calculations described in the first two sentences of Section 3(c) shall be made without giving effect to clause (ii) in each such sentence); and/or (f) Lessor may exercise any other right or remedy which may be available to Lessor under the Uniform Commercial Code, any other applicable law or in equity. A termination of this Agreement shall occur only upon written notice by Lessor to Lessee. Any termination shall not affect Lessee's obligation to pay all amounts due for periods prior to the effective date of such termination or Lessee's obligation to pay any indemnities under this Agreement. All remedies of Lessor under this Agreement or at law or in equity are cumulative.

16. MISCELLANEOUS: This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties. This Agreement may only be amended or modified by an instrument in writing executed by both parties. Lessor shall not by any act, delay, omission or otherwise be deemed to have waived any of its rights or remedies under this Agreement and no waiver whatsoever shall be valid unless in writing and signed by Lessor and then only to the extent therein set forth. A waiver by Lessor of any right or remedy under this Agreement on any one occasion shall not be construed as a bar to any right or remedy, which Lessor would otherwise have on any future occasion. If any term or provision of this Agreement or any application of any such term or provision is invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement and any other application of such term or provision will not be affected thereby. Without Lessor's prior written consent, Lessee shall not use or include Lessor's, Servicer's, any other agent of Lessor's names or trademarks orally or in writing in any media, customer lists or marketing materials. Giving of all notices under this Agreement will be sufficient if mailed by certified mail to a party at its address set forth below or at such other address as such party may provide in writing from time to time. Any such notice mailed to such address will be effective one (1) day after deposit in the United States mail, duly addressed, with certified mail, postage prepaid. Lessee will promptly notify Lessor of any change in Lessee's address. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts (including facsimile and pdf counterparts), but the counterpart marked "ORIGINAL.:' by Lessor will be the original lease for purposes of applicable law. All of the representations, warranties, covenants, agreements and obligations of each Lessee under this Agreement (if more than one) are joint and several.

18. NON-PETITION: Each party hereto hereby covenants and agrees that, prior to the date which is one year and one day after payment in full of all indebtedness Initials: EFM. ____ Customer ___ _
City Council 24 – 16 1/16/2024
City of Santa Ana
See Attached Signature Page
City Council 24 – 17 1/16/2024
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written.

ATTEST:
_______________________
JENNIFER L. HALL
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney
By: _______________________

TAMARA BOGOSIAN
Senior Assistant City Attorney

CITY OF SANTA ANA
_______________________
THOMAS R. HATCH
Interim City Manager
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
________________________

ROBERT RODRIGUEZ
Acting Chief of Police
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
________________________

MINH THAI
Executive Director
Planning and Building
City Council 24 – 18 1/16/2024
16th January, 2024
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 24 – 19 1/16/2024
City Council 24 – 20 1/16/2024
City Council 24 – 21 1/16/2024

SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN ENTERPRISE FLEET

MANAGEMENT, INC AND CITY OF SANTA ANA FOR VEHICLE LEASE AND

MAINTENANCE
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this 16 th day of January
2024, by and between Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc., a Missouri corporation also known as “Servicer” in the Master Equity Lease Agreement ( “Enterprise”), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (“City”). Enterprise and the City are referred to collectively as “The Parties.”

RECITALS
A. The City of Santa Ana leases vehicles for personnel assigned to the Investigations Bureau at the Santa Ana Police Department (“SAPD”), and for personnel assigned to the Planning and Building Agency (“PBA”), to assist with code enforcement, building inspection and cannabis enforcement activities to protect public health, safety and welfare, enforcing city codes related to nuisance and land use violations.

B. The City wishes to contract with Enterprise to facilitate the leasing and maintenance services of vehicles. The Santa Ana Police Department is the only department who will utilize the maintenance program.

C. Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS-3041 authorizes the City to purchase against contracts awarded by any public agency employing a competitive bid process. Sourcewell, a cooperative government purchasing agency, awarded a contract to Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. (Contract No. 030122-EFM) for procurement of fleet management services, open-end leases, maintenance management programs, etc., as a result of open, competitive bidding on behalf of its members, which includes government agencies.

D. Utilizing Sourcewell’s contract enables the City to enter into these agreements with Enterprise and obtain the best pricing and allows SAPD and PBA to continue with the existing lease vehicles currently under contract.

E. This pricing and services under this Agreement is in accordance with the contract between Enterprise Fleet Management and Sourcewell for Fleet Management Services Request for Proposal #030122-EFM effective until April 18, 2026.

F. Enterprise has several Agreements it requires the City to execute for the lease and maintenance of vehicles. This Supplemental Agreement supplements the following Enterprise Agreements: Master Walkaway Lease Agreement (MWLA); Master Equity Lease Agreement (MELA), and Maintenance EXHIBIT 4
City Council 24 – 22 1/16/2024
Management and Fleet Rental Agreement, Indemnity Agreement for MWLA, Indemnity Agreement for MELA, and Addendum to Maintenance Management Agreement (collectively “Enterprise Agreements”).

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:

1. COMPENSATION
a. The total amount to be expended for the lease and maintenance of vehicles from Enterprise for the Santa Ana Police Department and the Planning and Building Agency shall not exceed $612,936, annually.
b. All rent and other charges incurred in connection with the leased vehicles shall be consistent with paragraphs 3, 5 and 6 of the Master Equity Lease Agreement and Master Walkaway Lease Agreement entered into between the parties.
c. All vehicle repair and service fees, billing and payments in connection with the leased vehicles shall be consistent with paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Maintenance Management Agreement and Fleet Rental Agreement entered into between the parties.

2. TERM
Sections 2 and 3 of the Enterprise Master Equity Lease Agreement and the Enterprise Master Walkaway Lease Agreement will govern the Term, Rent and Other Charges, however, the parties acknowledge, understand and agree, due to the not to exceed amount listed in paragraph 1(a) herein, the City is not obligated by this Supplemental Agreement or any of the Enterprise Agreements to extend the term of the lease or maintenance of any leased vehicles past April 18, 2026. Further, the City retains the option to grant up to one (1)-year renewal of such authority, exercisable by a writing by the City Manager and the City Attorney. Cancellation of maintenance will be in accordance with Section 6 of the Maintenance Management and Fleet Rental Agreement.

3. INSURANCE
The City’s insurance requirements for the leased vehicles shall be consistent with paragraph 11 in the Master Equity Lease Agreement and Master Walkaway Lease Agreement.

City Council 24 – 23 1/16/2024

4. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS WITH ENTERPRISE
With approval from the City Council, the City Manager shall execute the following seven (7) Agreements between Enterprise and the City:
• Mater Walkaway Lease Agreement (“MWLA”)
• Master Equity Lease Agreement (“MELA”)
• Maintenance Management and Fleet Rental Agreement
• Supplemental Agreement
• Indemnity Agreement for MWLA
• Indemnity Agreement for MELA
• Addendum to Maintenance Management Agreement
The parties shall comply with the terms and conditions set forth in all seven Agreements listed herein

5. PRIOR PENDING OR EXISTING LEASE AGREEMENTS
The parties agree the Enterprise Agreements referred to herein do not alter, change, modify, amend, revise, supplement or change the terms and conditions for any prior pending and/or existing agreements for vehicles leased by the City from Enterprise prior to the effective date of these Agreements, or January 16, 2024. The City is not obligated by any of the Enterprise Agreements to extend the term of the lease or maintenance of any vehicles past April 18, 2026.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in This Section 5, City understands and agrees that termination of a lease will be in accordance with Section 3 of the Master Equity Lease Agreement and Master Walkaway Lease Agreement and cancellation of maintenance will be in accordance with Section 6 of the Maintenance Management and Fleet Rental Agreement.

6. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement.

7. INDEMNITY
The parties are entering into separate Indemnity Agreements, as identified in paragraph 4 herein which will govern the indemnity obligations between the parties. (Signatures on following page)
City Council 24 – 24 1/16/2024
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written.

ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA
Jennifer L. Hall Thomas R. Hatch
City Clerk Interim City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

SONIA R. CARVALHO ENTERPRISE FLEET MANAGEMENT
City Attorney INC.:

By:

Tamara Bogosian By:

Senior Assistant City Attorney
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

Robert Rodriguez Minh Thai
Acting Chief of Police Executive Director
Planning and Building
City Council 24 – 25 1/16/2024

INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into as of the 16th day of January, 2024, by and between Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc., (EFM), a Missouri corporation, and City of Santa Ana.

WITNESSETH:

INDEMNITY: Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. ("EFM") agrees to defend and indemnify City of Santa Ana from and against any and all losses, damages, liabilities, suits, claims, demands, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses) which City of Santa Ana may incur by reason of EFM's breach or violation of, or failure to observe or perform, any of its obligations as Servicer (EFM in such capacity, "Servicer") for Enterprise FM Trust in connection with the Master Walkaway Lease Agreement between City of Santa Ana and Enterprise FM Trust dated as of the date hereof, or as a result of any loss, damage, theft or destruction of any Vehicle or related to or arising out of or in connection with the use, operation or condition of any Vehicle, in each case, while the Vehicle was in possession of the Servicer.

Capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings given in the Lease.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, EFM and City of Santa Ana have executed this Indemnity Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

EFM: ENTERPRISE FLEET MANAGEMENT INC.
_________________________________
By: ____________
Title: ____________
Company: City of Santa Ana
(See attached Signature Page)
_________________________________
By: ____________
Title: ____________
Address: ____________ Address: ____________
____________ ____________ ____________
____________
Date Signed:____________, _______ Date Signed:_____________, ______ EXHIBIT 5
City Council 24 – 26 1/16/2024
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written.

CITY OF SANTA ANA
_______________________
THOMAS R. HATCH
Interim City Manager
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
________________________

ROBERT RODRIGUEZ
Acting Chief of Police
ATTEST:
_______________________
JENNIFER L. HALL
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney
By: _______________________

TAMARA BOGOSIAN
Senior Assistant City Attorney
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
________________________

MINH THAI
Executive Director
Planning and Building
City Council 24 – 27 1/16/2024

INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into as of the 16th day of January, 2024, by and between Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc., (EFM), a Missouri corporation, and City of Santa Ana.

WITNESSETH:

INDEMNITY: Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. ("EFM") agrees to defend and indemnify City of Santa Ana from and against any and all losses, damages, liabilities, suits, claims, demands, costs and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses) which City of Santa Ana may incur by reason of EFM's breach or violation of, or failure to observe or perform, any of its obligations as Servicer (EFM in such capacity, "Servicer") for Enterprise FM Trust in connection with the Master Equity Lease Agreement between City of Santa Ana and Enterprise FM Trust dated as of the date hereof, or as a result of any loss, damage, theft or destruction of any Vehicle or related to or arising out of or in connection with the use, operation or condition of any Vehicle, in each case, while the Vehicle was in possession of the Servicer.

Capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings given in the Lease.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, EFM and City of Santa Ana have executed this Indemnity Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

Company: City of Santa Ana EFM: ENTERPRISE FLEET MANAGEMENT INC. (See attached signature page) _________________________________ By: ____________ By: ____________
Title: ____________ Title: ____________
Address: ____________ Address: ____________
____________ ____________ ____________
____________
Date Signed:____________, _______ Date Signed:_____________, ______ EXHIBIT 6
City Council 24 – 28 1/16/2024
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written.

CITY OF SANTA ANA
_______________________
THOMAS R. HATCH
Interim City Manager
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
________________________

ROBERT RODRIGUEZ
Acting Chief of Police
ATTEST:
_______________________
JENNIFER L. HALL
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney
By: _______________________

TAMARA BOGOSIAN
Senior Assistant City Attorney
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
________________________

MINH THAI
Executive Director
Planning and Building
City Council 24 – 29 1/16/2024

AMENDMENT TO MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT AND FLEET RENTAL AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) dated this 16th day of January, 2024 is attached to, and made a part of, the MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT AND FLEET RENTAL AGREEMENT entered into on the ____ day of ________, ____ (“Agreement”) by and between Enterprise Fleet Management Inc., a Missouri corporation (“EFM”) and City of Santa Ana ("Company"). This Amendment is made for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by the parties.

Section 5 of the Maintenance Management and Fleet Rental Agreement is amended to add the following paragraph:

In the event Company notifies EFM of any claim or dispute under this Agreement, and/or any claim involving the Vehicle, EFM will, in good faith, attempt to resolve the Company’s claims in a manner satisfactory to all parties and EFM will provide commercially reasonable assistance to Company in any communications and/or negotiations with the vendor or service provider with respect to claims relating to such Vehicle.

All references in the Agreement and in the various Schedules and addenda to the Agreement and any other references of similar import shall henceforth mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment. Except to the extent specifically amended by this Amendment, all of the terms, provisions, conditions, covenants, representations and warranties contained in the Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect and the same are hereby ratified and confirmed.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Company and EFM have executed this Amendment to Maintenance Management and Fleet Rental Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

ENTERPRISE FLEET MANAGEMENT, INC.

By
Title:

City of Santa Ana (Company)
By (See attached signature page)
Title:

Date Signed:_________________, _______ Date Signed:_______________________, _______ EXHIBIT 7
City Council 24 – 30 1/16/2024
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written.

CITY OF SANTA ANA
_______________________
THOMAS R. HATCH
Interim City Manager
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
________________________

ROBERT RODRIGUEZ
Acting Chief of Police
ATTEST:
_______________________
JENNIFER L. HALL
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney
By: _______________________

TAMARA BOGOSIAN
Senior Assistant City Attorney
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
________________________

MINH THAI
Executive Director
Planning and Building
City Council 24 – 31 1/16/2024
Current Police Department Leases
Chief’s Office
Vehicle # Division Purpose
1 Chief General Police Duties
1 Executive Officer General (PMA MOU)
1 Internal Affairs Critical Incident Response (PMA MOU) 1 Adjutant General Admin Duties
1 PIO Critical Incident Response
Administration Bureau
1 Deputy Chief General (PMA MOU)
1 Training Commander General (PMA MOU)
1 Training General/Transport OCSD Academy
1 Human Resources General (Share w/Backgrounds)
2 Backgrounds Field Interviews
1 CDC Loaner
Field Operations Bureau
1 Deputy Chief General (PMA MOU)
3 Area Commanders General (PMA MOU)
3 Watch Commanders General (PMA MOU)
1 Traffic Commander General (PMA MOU)
2 Directed Patrol Undercover Capabilities
1 Emergency Management EOC Activation Response
1 Traffic General/Major Collision Response
Investigations Bureau
1 Deputy Chief General (PMA MOU)
3 Commanders General Field Response (PMA MOU)
7 Criminal Investigations Field Response/Interviews
10 Homicide Field Response/Interviews
1 Gangs Undercover Capabilities
7 MMDTF Undercover Capabilities
Jail Bureau
1 Jail Administrator General (PMA MOU)
Miscellaneous
1 Unassigned Returned to Enterprise due to vacancy
EXHIBIT 8
City Council 24 – 32 1/16/2024
City Clerk’s Office
www.santa-ana.org/city-clerks-office
Item # 25
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
January 16, 2024
TOPIC: Election of Mayor Pro Tem for 2024

AGENDA TITLE
Election of Mayor Pro Tem for 2024

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Nominate and elect one Councilmember to serve as Mayor Pro Tem for calendar year 2024.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
At the December 8, 2020 Special City Council meeting, the City Council decided to make the mayor pro tem position an annual appointment rather than a two-year appointment as was previous practice. At the November 8, 2022 General Municipal Election, the Santa Ana electorate approved amendments to the Santa Ana City Charter, including revisions to Section 405, which now reads: “Each calendar year, at the first meeting in January, the City Council shall elect a mayor pro tem who shall act as mayor during the absence from the city or disability of the mayor, or during any vacancy in the office of mayor until otherwise filled in accordance with section 403.” Section 405 provides that all members of the City Council, other than the mayor, shall be eligible to serve as mayor pro tem regardless of their seniority or whether they have previously served as mayor pro tem, with the exception that the mayor pro tem from the previous year cannot be selected as the mayor pro tem for the next year. The mayor pro tem serves at the will and pleasure of the City Council and may be replaced by four affirmative votes of the City Council.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Mayor Pro Tem History
City Council 25 – 1 1/16/2024
Election of Mayor Pro Tem for 2024
January 16, 2024

Page 2 ends

Submitted By: Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk
Approved By: Tom Hatch, Interim City Manager
City Council 25 – 2 1/16/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA

HISTORY OF MAYOR PRO TEM

YEAR COUNCILMEMBER
2023 Jessie Lopez
2022 Phil Bacerra
2021 David Penaloza
2019-2020 Juan Villegas
2017-2018 Michele Martinez
2015-2016 Vicente Sarmiento
2013-2014 Sal Tinajero
2011-2012 Claudia Alvarez
2009-2010 Claudia Alvarez
2/2007-2008 Claudia Alvarez
11/2006-2/2007 Carlos Bustamante
2005-11/2006 Lisa Bist
2003-2004 Brett Franklin
2001-2002 Patricia McGuigan
1999-2000 Tom Lutz
1997-1998 Robert Richardson
1995-1996 Robert Richardson
1993-1994 Miguel Pulido
1991-1992 Miguel Pulido
1989-1990 John Acosta
City Council 25 – 3 1/16/2024
Planning and Building Agency
www.santa-ana.org/planning-division/
Item # 26
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
January 16, 2024
TOPIC: Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street)

AGENDA TITLE
Amendment Application No. 2023-04 and Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-03 for the expansion of Vista Heritage Charter School located at 601 North Fairview Street Published in the Orange County Reporter on January 5, 2024 and notices mailed on January 4, 2023.

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Approve first reading of an ordinance approving Amendment Application (Zone Change) No. 2023-04.

ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING AMENDMENT APPLICATION NO. 2023-04 AMENDING THE ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 601 NORTH FAIRVIEW STREET (APN: 405-241-04) FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (M1) TO SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 82 (SD-82)

2. Adopt first reading of an ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2023-03 as conditioned.

ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX entitled ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2023-03 – AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 82 (SD-82) TO EXPAND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SD-82 AND TO AMEND VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE SD-82 TO ALLOW FOR THE CREATION OF THREE (3) LAND USE

ZONES, NEW PERMITTED USES AND ANCILLARY USES, AND

ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPERTY MAINTENANCE,

COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS (CC&RS) AND

RECIPROCAL PARKING AND ACCESS AGREEMENTS

3. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is exempt from further review per Section 15301 Existing Facilities (Class 1 – Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines City Council 26 – 1 1/16/2024
Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024

Page 2 ends

and per Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning) of the CEQA Guidelines.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Collin Felch, representing Vista Heritage Charter Schools, is requesting approval of Amendment Application (Zone Change) No. 2023-04 and Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) No. 2023-03 to rezone 601 North Fairview Street (APN: 405-241-04) and expand the boundaries of Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) to accommodate the conversion of an existing 5,837-square-foot industrial building into an administrative office building for Vista Charter School. Approval of the amendment application will allow the change for the zoning of the subject property from Light Industrial (M1) to SD82.

Furthermore, the zoning ordinance amendment will expand the boundaries of SD-82, and allow Administrative Offices as a permitted use on Parcel 4, and Outdoor Play Areas as a permitted use ancillary to schools on Parcel 2. Staff is recommending approval of the requests subject to conditions of approval that will address any potential negative impacts on the neighboring land uses.

Moreover, staff is supporting the applicant’s request because the project complies with the General Plan goals and policies and with the applicable zoning district’s development standards. The proposed project seeks to preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts through the promotion of a clean, safe, and creative environment.

Planning Commission Action and Background
At its regular meeting on December 11, 2023, the Planning Commission voted 6:0 (Commissioner Ramos absent) following a public hearing to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2023-04 and an ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-03.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

DISCUSSION
Project Description
The amendment application will allow the rezoning of the subject property from M1 to SD-82 and help facilitate the conversion of a 5,837-square-foot industrial building into an administrative office that will serve Vista Heritage Charter School. Furthermore, the proposed administrative office will serve as headquarters for Vista Heritage Charter School that will oversee a total of six charter schools and it will employ a total of ten individuals that are currently employed at different Vista Heritage Charter Schools. The SD-82 boundaries would be expanded to include the subject property (601 N. Fairview Street or Parcel 4 as illustrated on Exhibit 9), which is approximately 39,437 square feet and located north of the existing SD-82 zoning district, and adjacent to Fairview Street and the Pacific Electric right-of-way (ROW).

City Council 26 – 2 1/16/2024
Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024

Page 3 ends

As part of the overall scope of work, the applicant also proposes various site improvements at the subject site on Parcel 4, including improved landscape in the parking lot; a façade remodel to the existing 5,837-square-foot industrial building that is proposed to be converted into an office; construction of a new 2,297-square-foot garden; and new gates to enclose the garden. The new proposed garden will be located in the rear of the existing industrial building to be converted into an administrative office within a gated area and it will serve the Vista Heritage Charter School administrative office employees. Additionally, the building improvements for the converted office building will include façade modifications to create new glass windows and doors; removal of the garage doors; and the creation of new offices, conference rooms, reception area, storage rooms, and an employee breakroom. Furthermore, the scope of work includes improvements at the Vista Heritage Charter School location (2501 W.

Fifth Street or Parcel 2 as illustrated on Exhibit 9) for a new outdoor play area that totals 12,012 square feet and gates to enclose the play area. The existing indoor gym and office spaces will remain for indoor recreation and physical education for the students and administrative purposes, without any proposed changes. The outdoor play area will be located directly adjacent to Vista Heritage Charter School on the north side of the building and will serve as a play area for the school’s students during the school’s regular business hours. Lastly, the site improvements include a metal wire fence that will be installed by Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) along the north property line adjacent to the OC Street Car tracks.

At this time, there is no additional square footage being proposed. All the proposed improvements will fall within the existing building. The current student enrollment is 840 students and there is no expansion of student enrollment or school capacity proposed as part of the project.

Table 1: Project and Location Information
Item Information
Project Address and Council Ward 601 North Fairview Street – Ward 5 Nearest Intersection Fairview Street and Fifth Street
General Plan Designation Industrial/Flex-Medium (Flex-1.5) Existing Zoning Designation Light Industrial (M1)
Proposed Zoning Designation Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) North Pacific Electric Right-of-Way (ROW)/OCTA
Streetcar and School District Offices
East Pacific Electric Right-of-Way (ROW)/OCTA
Streetcar
South Vista Heritage Charter School and Industrial
Businesses
Surrounding Land Uses
West Lydia Romero-Cruz Academy
Property Size 0.905 Acres (39,437 square feet)
Existing Site Development
The subject site contains a one-story, 5,837-square-foot building.

Existing Site Uses Auto repair uses to be converted into administrative uses.

Tenant Size 5,837 square feet
Use Permissions Amendment to allow Administrative Offices as a permitted use on Parcel 4, and Outdoor Play Areas as a permitted use
City Council 26 – 3 1/16/2024
Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024

Page 4 ends

ancillary to schools on Parcel 2, within the SD-82 and subject to operational standards.

Zoning Code Sections Affected Uses SAMC Section 41-593 and SD-82 Operational Standards SAMC Section 41-593 and SD-82
Table 2: Development Standards
Standard Required by SAMC and SD-82 Provided
Permitted Uses Administrative Offices on Parcel
4; and Outdoor Play Areas as a
permitted use ancillary to
schools on Parcel 2
Complies: The administrative office
building is 5,837 square feet is
located on Parcel 4, and the Outdoor
Play Area is located on Parcel 2.

Walls and Screening Roof equipment shall be
screened.

Complies: New roof mounted
mechanical equipment will be
screened with a parapet wall.

Additionally, the line-of-sight
illustrates that the equipment will not
be visible to pedestrians in the new
vicinity.

Landscaping 10-foot wide landscape area is
required along north property
line and landscaped planter shall
meet the commercial landscape
standards
Complies: the site plan illustrates a
10-foot wide landscape area along
the north property line and landscape
planters that comply with commercial
landscape standards.

Parking Per previous entitlements, the
site must contain a minimum of
287 parking spaces.

Complies: The site plan illustrates 293
parking spaces.

Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5 maximum Complies: 0.14 FAR
Project Background
On October 6, 2008, the City Council approved several entitlements for the Civic Center Business Park located at the northeast corner of Fifth Street and Fairview Street, including Amendment Application No. 2008-06 (Ordinance No. NS-2777). The amendment application allowed for a zone change of the business park site from M1 to SD-82. The request was initiated by the Templo Calvario Assembly of God Church, which at the time was proposing to expand their worship facilities by constructing a larger sanctuary at 2501 West Fifth Street. However, the specific development still allowed for the retention of the existing office, retail, and industrial uses operating in the business park, by allowing all uses within the Light Industrial (M1) zoning district.

Subsequently, on January 21, 2020, the City Council approved additional entitlements affecting the business park, including ZOA No. 2019-01 (Ordinance No. NS-2983), to allow school uses by right.

City Council 26 – 4 1/16/2024
Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024

Page 5 ends

Prior to the approval of ZOA No. 2019-01, school uses had been in operation at the business park. Specifically, Templo Calvario operated a preschool and kindergarten at 2609 West Fifth Street since the 1990s. In 2003, the Edward B. Cole Senior Academy occupied the site until it relocated to another Santa Ana location in 2010. From 2011 to 2015, Templo Calvario once again operated a school at this location. In 2015, Vista Heritage Charter School took over operations at the site. In 2019, Vista Heritage Charter School expanded their 6-8th grade operation located at 2609 W. Fifth Street to include kindergarten through 5th grades within two adjacent suites, pursuant to approval of ZOA No. 2019-01, which also allowed an increase in student enrollment and school operations. Currently, Vista Heritage Charter School occupies approximately 66,000 square feet of building space and accommodates a maximum of 870 students, at 2601 through 2617 West Fifth Street.

Project Analysis
The proposed project aims to achieve two primary objectives. First, the zoning ordinance amendment is seeking to expand the boundaries of SD-82 and allow an Administrative Office use on Parcel 4, and an Outdoor Play Areas on Parcel 2, as an ancillary use to the Vista Heritage Charter School. Second, the amendment application intends to amend the zoning map by rezoning the subject property from M1 to SD-82.

The following sections of this report provides analysis for the proposed action item and the basis for staff’s recommendation of approval for the project.

Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Pursuant to SAMC Section 41-593.1, the purpose and intent of a specific development (SD) designation is to provide a tailored and flexible zoning approach to address specific and exceptional circumstances associated with certain parcels, while protecting and promoting the public health, safety, and general welfare of the City and its residents. These circumstances may include unique characteristics, historical significance, or specific community needs that deviate from the standard zoning regulations. Moreover, SD designations protect and enhance the value of properties by encouraging the use of good design principles and concepts; encouraging, securing, and maintaining the orderly and harmonious appearance, attractiveness, and aesthetic development; providing a method whereby specific development plans are based on the general plan; and by recognizing the interdependence of land values and aesthetics and providing a method to implement interdependence.

For this specific proposal, the applicant is proposing to amend the SD-82 document to allow Administrative Offices as a permitted use on Parcel 4 and Outdoor Play Areas on Parcel 2, ancillary to the existing school. In response to this application, staff is proposing that SD-82 be revised pursuant to Table 3 below:

Table 3: Permitted Uses and Operational Standards for SD-82

REQUIREMENT ISSUE AND PROPOSED AMENDMENT
STANDARDS: Issue:

City Council 26 – 5 1/16/2024
Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024

Page 6 ends

Circulation and Parking
Management Plan
School traffic may conflict with local traffic patterns and adjacent uses. In primarily industrial districts, like SD-82, the impacts could be particularly severe.

Proposed Amendment:

The school prepared a Circulation and Parking Management Plan (“Plan”) that was reviewed as part of the Development Project Review (DP) that was submitted in February of 2023. The Plan takes into account the parking, onsite circulation, drop off, and pick up. The Plan identifies how the school buses will pick-up and drop-off students within the front parking lot. The Plan is designed to accommodate the existing school population and to ensure that there is no vehicle queuing off-site or conflicts with the adjacent industrial buildings to the north and west of the site. Future modifications to the Plan may require a traffic analysis to demonstrate compliance. Lastly, at this time, the project does not propose an increase in student enrollment or additional square footage.

Physical Education
Activity Area Standards
Issue:

Noise resulting from physical education or after-school sports activities can impact adjacent residents or tenants.

Proposed Amendment:

Physical education activity areas shall be designed so that their use does not disturb the commercial or industrial uses during regular business hours and residential uses between the hours of 8 p.m. and 7 a.m. As proposed, the physical education activities will be relocated to a designated gated area located directly adjacent to the existing school. In addition, the school’s regular hours are Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. Outdoor activities will not take place outside of the school’s regular hours. Furthermore, the noise sources are typically intermittent and short in duration. Additionally, the impact of noise diminishes significantly with distance from its origin. The sensitive receptors (residential zones and land uses) are situated approximately 200 feet away. Therefore, the proposed Outdoor Play Area’s generated noise would not adversely affect these sensitive receptors.

Administrative Offices Issue:

The administrative office may increase parking demand and traffic generation of the entire site.

Proposed Amendment:

The proposed change of use is not expected to impact the parking demand on-site due to specific parking requirements. The administrative office requires three (3) parking spaces per 1,000 square feet; whereas, the auto-repair businesses required five (5) parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. Additionally, the administrative office will only be employing a total of ten (10) individuals and the total increase in trip generation during peak hours is not significant enough to trigger concerns.

Maximum Student
Enrollment
Issue:

Number of students can dictate the level of impact on adjacent uses. More students mean more cars or buses picking up or dropping off students, more children on the playground, and more noise.

City Council 26 – 6 1/16/2024
Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024

Page 7 ends

Proposed Amendment:

The proposed number of students will not increase. The number of student enrollment will remain at a maximum of 870 students. This enrollment cap will remain in the SD document.

Industrial Uses Issue:

The current list of permitted uses in SD-82 contains various industrial uses, which are no longer consistent with the General Plan land use designation and the designated focus area. The Flex-1.5 land use designation encourages industrial uses that do not produce significant air pollutants including office-industrial flex spaces, small-scale clean manufacturing, research and development, among other uses. Moreover, the focus area is intended to transition a group of auto-oriented neighborhoods and institutions into a series of transit-oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops.

Proposed Amendment:

The proposed amendment will update the list of permissible uses per zone to establish consistency with the Flex-1.5 General Plan land use designation and the focus area.

Amendment Application
Currently, the site to the south of 601 N. Fairview Street is zoned SD-82, and the proposed rezoning intends to align the subject site with the existing development to the south.

Within the SD-82 regulations, permissible uses encompass industrial, school, and church uses. Expanding the SD-82 boundaries will accommodate additional administrative office use at 601 N. Fairview Street. This zoning adjustment aims to repurpose the existing industrial building, historically serving as an auto-repair business, into an administrative office space.

Under the current M1 zoning, only up to 30% of the gross floor area can be allocated for administrative office use. The proposed rezoning, coupled with amendments to the SD82 regulations, seeks to enable the existing building's operation as an administrative office without constraint, limited to Parcel 4. More importantly, the rezoning is not anticipated to exacerbate traffic flow, parking demands, or noise impacts. As detailed in Table 3, the proposed rezoning is projected to address and mitigate any potential adverse effects on the surrounding community.

General Plan Consistency
The proposed zoning amendment advances the vision for the subject site’s General Plan Focus Area and will bring the site into alignment and compliance with the General Plan through reducing and eliminating traditional heavy industrial and noxious uses currently allowable on the properties. The property is located in the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area and is designated as Industrial/Flex-Low (Flex-1.5). This Focus Area envisions a mixed-use corridor with a goal of transitioning out existing autoCity Council 26 – 7 1/16/2024 Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024

Page 8 ends

oriented and traditional industrial uses to clean manufacturing and research and development uses, and live-work maker spaces that are compatible and can coexist with residential and other sensitive land uses such as schools, churches, and recreation facilities.

In addition, the approval of the subject project will be consistent with the General Plan land use designation and the designated focus area. The Flex-1.5 land use designation encourages a myriad of industrial uses that do not produce significant air pollutants including office-industrial flex spaces, small-scale clean manufacturing, research and development, among other uses. Furthermore, the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area is intended to transition a group of auto-oriented neighborhoods and institutions into a series of transit-oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. In order to accomplish the goals of the General Plan, the focus area promotes infill development while respecting established neighborhoods and providing buffers from industrial to residential neighborhoods. The proposed project will create a buffer from industrial uses to residential by changing the use of an auto-repair building into an office space. Additionally, the proposed project proposes landscape improvements and a community garden that will further act as buffers and accomplish the goals of the General Plan.

Moreover, the approval of the proposed applications will be consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan, specifically Goals 1, 2, and 3 of the Land Use Element (LU). Goal 1 of the LU provides a land use plan that improves the quality of life and respects the existing community. Policy 1-8 encourages new development to provide a new community benefit. The change of use from auto-repair to office will provide a benefit to the community by reducing the noise, fumes, and waste that stem from autorepair-like businesses. Additionally, the outdoor play area for the school will allow the school to offer their students a space for recreational purposed within their business hours. Goal 2 of the LU seeks a balance of land uses to meet Santa Ana’s diverse needs. Policy 2-6 promotes rehabilitation of properties and encourages increased levels of capital investment to create a safe and attractive environment. Approval of the amendment application and the zoning ordinance amendment will promote the rehabilitation of the existing building with a new façade and site improvements. Goal 3 of the LU seeks to preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts. Policy 3-7 promotes a clean, safe, and creative environment for Santa Ana’s residential, workers, and visitors. Approval of the project will promote a clean, safe, and creative environment for Santa Ana’s residents by reducing hazardous waste produced by auto repair businesses, enhancing the architecture of the existing building, and enhancing the site by introducing new landscape.

City Council 26 – 8 1/16/2024
Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024

Page 9 ends

Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions
During the development review phase of the project, the City obtained information concerning the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) governing both Parcel 2 and Parcel 4 illustrated in Exhibit 9. These CC&Rs outline potential use restrictions that could impact these parcels. However, these stipulations do not hinder the City's authority to proceed with the intended rezoning and revising of the SD-82 text.

Furthermore, the text of SD-82 requires the update and clarification of these CC&Rs, mandating their refinement and subsequent submission to the City before permit issuance.

Public Notification and Community Outreach
Project notifications were posted, published, and mailed in accordance with City and State regulations for both the Planning Commission and the City Council public hearing.

At the time this report was printed, no issues of concern were raised regarding the proposed development.

In addition to the above noticing, the project was subject to the City’s Sunshine Ordinance (Ordinance No. NS-3040) requiring two meetings to facilitate early public participation. The first community meeting was held March 6, 2023. Eleven members of the community attended and posted questions relating to on-site traffic circulation, the outdoor play area, the location of the proposed fences, and parking concerns. The second community meeting was held May 15, 2023, during which 10 members of the community attended and expressed that the site plan did not address the traffic circulation concerns raised previously. Materials from the two required community meetings are included with this report as Exhibit 8, and all materials were published to the project’s webpage on the City’s website at santa-ana.org/vista-charter-school/.

Additional Outreach
The applicant organized an additional meeting on May 23, 2023, with stakeholders, City staff, and Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) staff to discuss the parking requirements of Parcel 2 and Parcel 4 listed in the CC&Rs and optional overflow parking not listed in the CC&Rs for Templo Calvario. Moreover, on November 3 and November 15, the applicant met with various stakeholders to discuss the proposed site plan, parking requirements, and clarification on the CC&Rs limitations. The purpose of the meetings was to ensure ongoing communication about the steps and substance needed in order to revise the CC&Rs to reflect the current project, should the requested entitlements be approved.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is exempt from further review per Section 15301 Existing Facilities (Class 1 – Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines and per Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning) of the CEQA Guidelines.

City Council 26 – 9 1/16/2024
Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024

Page 10 ends

Class 1 exemption applies to the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use as determined by the lead agency. The subject project is proposing the change of use of an existing industrial building that was previously used for an auto repair business to be used for administrative office purposes.

Additionally, the project is exempt from further review per Section 15183 (Projects Consistent with a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning) of the CEQA Guidelines.

The environmental review contained in Exhibit 7 has been prepared, and peer reviewed by a qualified CEQA consultant hired by the City, to assess the potential for the proposed project to result in environmental effects and whether the proposed project qualified for an exemption under Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines. Moreover, the analysis evaluated whether the potential environmental impacts are addressed in the City of Santa Ana General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report (GPU EIR). Specifically, the analysis evaluates the change of use of the existing 5,837-square-foot building from auto-repair to administrative office and site improvements that include new landscaping, façade remodel, and new outdoor areas for the office and the school.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 allows a streamlined environmental review process for projects that are consistent with the densities established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified and does not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.

Moreover, projects that are consistent with the densities and use characteristics considered by the GPU EIR may qualify for the CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Exemption process. This exemption process may be used when a project meets the following conditions:
a) The project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. b) There are no project specific effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. c) There are no project specific impacts which the prior EIR failed to analyze as significant effects.
d) There are no potentially significant off-site and/or cumulative impacts which the prior EIR failed to evaluate.
e) There is no substantial new information which results in more severe impacts than anticipated by the prior EIR.

The GPU was adopted, and the GPU EIR certified, in April 2022 (State Clearinghouse Number 2020029087); the GPU went into effect on May 26, 2022. Any decision by the City affecting land use and development must be consistent with the GPU. The GPU EIR evaluates the potential environmental effects associated with implementation of the GPU and addresses appropriate and feasible mitigation measures that would minimize City Council 26 – 10 1/16/2024
Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024

Page 11 ends

or eliminate these impacts. Pursuant to Section 15183(i)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines, a project is consistent with the GPU if the development density does not exceed what was contemplated and analyzed for the parcel(s) in the certified GPU EIR and complies with the associated standards applicable to that development density. Development density standards can include the number of dwelling units per acre, the number of people in a given area, floor area ratio (FAR), and other measures of building intensity, building height, size limitations, and use restrictions.

The GPU identifies that the Interim Development Standard for the FLEX-1.5 area are those development standards outlined for the M1 zoning designation. The M1 zone provides for a variety of light industrial uses, including warehousing, manufacture, assembly, machine shops, wholesale businesses, and ancillary uses such as office uses that do not exceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area. The Project would result in a FAR of 0.14, which is within the projections of the GPU EIR, which evaluated a density of 1.5 FAR on the site. The GPU EIR adequately anticipated and analyzed the impacts of this Project, identified applicable mitigation measures necessary to reduce impacts of the Project, and the Project implements the applicable mitigation measures.

The Project, therefore, qualifies for an exemption from additional environmental review as set forth in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. The full exemption analysis is provided as Exhibit 7 of this report. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2023-40 will be filed for this project.

ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS
To date, the proposed project has generated a total of 156 temporary employment opportunities, including environmental engineers, environmental remediation technicians, demolition crew, architects, engineers, development consultants, and an attorney. Additionally, the new administrative office will create ten permanent employment positions. Moreover, the applicant will pay approximately $46,235 in entitlement, plan check, and permit fees.

There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Amendment Application Ordinance

2. Zoning Ordinance Amendment Ordinance

3. Vicinity Zoning and Aerial Map

4. Site Photo

5. Full Project Plans

6. Renderings

7. Environmental Analysis and Exemption

8. Community Meetings Documents

9. Parcel Map in Recording No. 86-284222

10.Planning Commission Agenda Packet with Public Comments City Council 26 – 11 1/16/2024
Vista Heritage Charter School (601 North Fairview Street) January 16, 2024

Page 12 ends

Submitted By: Minh Thai, Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency Approved By: Tom Hatch, Interim City Manager
City Council 26 – 12 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 1 of 7 ends

ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA ANA APPROVING AMENDMENT APPLICATION
NO. 2023-04 AMENDING THE ZONING FOR THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 601 NORTH FAIRVIEW STREET
(APN: 405-241-04) FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (M1) TO
SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO. 82 (SD-82)

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows:

A. Red Hook Capital Partners, LLC with Vista Heritage Charter Schools (“Applicant”) representing 2609 W. 5th Street LLC (Property Owner) is requesting approval of Amendment Application (AA) No. 2023-04 to change the zoning designation of the property located at 601 North Fairview Street (APN: 405-241-04) from Light Industrial (M1) to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) in order to facilitate the change of use of an existing auto-repair business to an administrative office.

B. Chapter 41, Article I, Division 1, Section 41-1 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code establishes that because of the necessity of segregating the location of residences, businesses, trades and industries; regulating the use of buildings, structures, and land; and regulating the location, height, bulk and size of buildings and structures, the size of yards and open spaces, the City is divided into land-use districts of such number, shape and area as may be considered best suited to carry out these regulations and provide for their enforcement. The regulations are considered necessary in order to:
encourage the most appropriate use of land, conserve and stabilize property value, provide adequate open spaces for light and air and to prevent and fight fires, prevent undue concentration of population, lessen congestion on streets and highways, and promote the health, safety and general welfare of the people, all as part of the general plan of the City. The City of Santa Ana has adopted a zoning map which has since been amended from time to time.

C. On April 19, 2022, the City adopted the General Plan Update and it went into effect on May 26, 2022. The approval of the subject project is consistent with the Industrial/Flex-Low (Flex-1.5) General Plan land use designation and the designated West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. The Flex-1.5 land use designation encourage a myriad of industrial uses that do not produce significant air pollutants including office-industrial flex spaces, small-scale clean manufacturing, among other uses. The proposed zoning amendment advances the vision for the subject site’s General Plan Focus City Council 26 – 13 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 2 of 7 ends

Area and will bring the site into alignment and compliance with the General Plan through reducing and eliminating traditional heavy industrial and noxious uses currently allowable on the properties. Furthermore, the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area envisions a mixed-use corridor with a goal of transitioning out existing auto-oriented and traditional industrial uses to clean manufacturing and research and development uses, and live-work maker spaces that are compatible and can coexist with residential and other sensitive land uses such as schools, churches, and recreation facilities.

In addition, the focus area would transition the auto-oriented neighborhoods and institutions into a series of transit-oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. In order to accomplish the goals of the General Plan, the focus area promotes infill development while respecting established neighborhoods and providing buffers from industrial to residential neighborhoods. The proposed project will create a buffer from industrial uses to residential by changing the use of an auto-repair building into an office space. Additionally, the proposed project proposes landscape improvements and a community garden that will further act as buffers and accomplish the goals of the General Plan.

D. The entire Project as currently proposed entails, among other things, (1) Approval of Amendment Application No. 2023-07 to change the site’s zoning designation from Light Industrial (M1) to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) and (2) approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-03 to expand the boundaries of SD-82 and to allow for Administrative Offices as a permitted use on Parcel 4, and an Outdoor Play Area in Parcel 2 ancillary to the Vista Heritage Charter School.

E. The Applicant has demonstrated compliance with all requirements of the Sunshine Ordinance codified at Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 2-153, including public notification and hosting of required community meetings.

Materials resulting from the meetings were subsequently posted to the City’s webpage for the project.

F. On December 11, 2023, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and voted to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2023-04.

G. On January 16, 2024, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing and voted to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Amendment Application No. 2023-04.

H. For the reasons contained herein, and each of them, Amendment Application No. 2023-04 is hereby found and determined to be consistent with the intent and purpose of Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code; thus, changing the zoning district is found to be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana and otherwise justified by the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare.

City Council 26 – 14 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 3 of 7 ends

Section 2. The Amendment Application consists of amendments to the Zoning Map, as shown in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 3. The City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the analysis performed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Environmental Review No. 2023-40). In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is categorically exempt from further review per Section 15301 (Class 1 – Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines. Class 1 exemption applies to the operation, repair maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The subject project is proposing the change of use of an existing industrial building that was previously used for an auto repair business to be used for administrative office purposes. Additionally, the project is exempt from further review pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the Project is exempt from further review. This type of exemption analysis evaluates whether the potential environmental impacts of the proposed change of use for the existing 5,837-square-foot building from auto-repair to administrative office and site improvements that include new landscape, façade remodel, and new outdoor areas for the office and the school are addressed in the City of Santa Ana General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report (GPU EIR). A rezoning that is consistent with an adopted general plan falls within this exemption. (A) As set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(a), projects that are “consistent with the development density established by the existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.” The CEQA Guidelines further state that “[i]f an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to the project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards . . . then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the basis of that impact.” CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(c).
(B) The GPU was adopted, and the GPU EIR certified, in April 2022 (State Clearinghouse Number 2020029087); the GPU went into effect on May 26, 2022. Any decision by the City affecting land use and development must be consistent with the GPU.

The GPU EIR evaluates the potential environmental effects associated with implementation of the GPU and addresses appropriate and feasible mitigation measures that would minimize or eliminate these impacts. A project is consistent with the GPU if its development density is the same or less than the standard expressed for the involved parcel in the general plan for which an EIR has been certified, and the project complies with the density-related standards contained in that plan. CEQA Guidelines section 15183(i)(2). Development density standards can include the number of dwelling units per acre, the number of people in a given area, floor area ratio (FAR), and other measures of building intensity, building height, size limitations, and use restrictions.

City Council 26 – 15 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 4 of 7 ends

(C) The GPU identifies that the Interim Development Standard for the FLEX-1.5 area is M1. The M1 zone provides for a variety of light industrial uses, including warehousing, manufacture, assembly, machine shops, wholesale businesses and ancillary uses such as office uses that do not exceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area. The Project would result in a FAR of 0.14, which is within the projections of the GPU EIR, which evaluated a density of 1.5 FAR on the site. The GPU EIR adequately anticipated and analyzed the impacts of this Project and identified applicable mitigation measures necessary to reduce impacts of the Project, and the Project implements the applicable mitigation measures.
(D) Specifically, the Project qualifies for the exemption because the following findings can be made:

1. The Project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified.

The Project would result in a FAR of 0.14, which is less than the maximum FAR of

1.5 allowable in the FLEX-1.5 designated area, which is the development density established by the GPU and analyzed in the GPU EIR. The Project site has an Interim Development Standard of M-1 (light Industrial zone). The M-1 zone does not have density requirements.

2. There are no Project specific effects which are peculiar to the Project or its site, and which the GPU EIR failed to analyze as significant effects. The subject property is similar to other properties in the area, including its land use designation and zoning. The property does not support any peculiar environmental features, and the Project would not result in any peculiar effects. In addition, as explained further in the prepared Exemption Checklist, project impacts were adequately analyzed by the GPU EIR; and as detailed in the GPU EIR, development projects pursuant to the GPU, such as the proposed Project, could result in potentially significant impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and noise. However, applicable mitigation measures specified within the GPU EIR would reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level.

3. There are no potentially significant off-site and/or cumulative impacts which the GPU EIR failed to evaluate. The Project is consistent with the density and use characteristics of the development considered by the GPU EIR and would represent a small part of the growth that was forecast for build-out of the GPU. The GPU EIR considered the incremental impacts of the Project, and as explained further in the prepared Exemption Checklist, no potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts have been identified which were not previously evaluated.

4. There is no substantial new information which results in more severe impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. As explained in the prepared Exemption Checklist, no new information has been identified which would result in a determination of a more severe impact than what had been anticipated by the GPU EIR.

5. As explained in the prepared Exemption Checklist, the Project will undertake feasible mitigation measures specified in the GPU EIR. These GPU EIR mitigation City Council 26 – 16 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 5 of 7 ends

measures will be undertaken through Project design, compliance with regulations and ordinances, and through the Project’s conditions of approval. (E) The Project therefore qualifies for an exemption from additional environmental review as set forth in Public Resources Code section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. The full exemption analysis is provided in Exhibit 7 of the staff report accompanying this Ordinance. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2023-40 will be filed for this project.

Section 4. An amended Sectional District Map, showing the above described changes in use district designation, is hereby approved and attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein.

Section 5. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby approves Amendment Application No. 2023-04. This decision is based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Request for Planning Commission Action dated December 11, 2023 and exhibits attached hereto; and the public testimony, written and oral, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 7. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption.

Section 8. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. [Signatures on the following page]
City Council 26 – 17 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 6 of 7 ends

ADOPTED this day of , 2024.

Valerie Amezcua
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sonia R. Carvalho
City Attorney
By:

Jose Montoya
Assistant City Attorney
AYES: Councilmembers
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers
City Council 26 – 18 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 7 of 7 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NSXXXX to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on , 2024 and that said ordinance was published in
accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana.

Date:

City Clerk
City of Santa Ana
City Council 26 – 19 1/16/2024
City Council 26 – 20 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 1 of 16 ends

ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXXX
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 2023-03 – AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA AMENDING SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT NO.
82 (SD-82) TO EXPAND THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SD-82
AND TO AMEND VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE SD-82 TO
ALLOW FOR THE CREATION OF THREE (3) LAND USE

ZONES, NEW PERMITTED USES AND ANCILLARY USES,

AND ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR PROPERTY

MAINTENANCE, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND

RESTRICTIONS (CC&RS) AND RECIPROCAL PARKING

AND ACCESS AGREEMENTS

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows:

A. On October 20, 2008, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2777, rezoning the property located at 2501 West Fifth Street, described as Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map No. 84-886, as shown on a map filed in Book 198, Pages 19-20 of Parcels Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California, from Light Industrial (M-1) to Specific Development Plan No. 82 (SD-82).

B. On January 21, 2020, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. NS-2983, to amend the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) to include a definition of “schools”; allow schools as a permitted use in SD-82; to adopt a set of operational standards for schools within SD-82; allow Vista Heritage Charter School to expand to 66,000 square feet in size; and allow Vista Heritage Charter School to expand the student enrollment to 870 students.

C. The proposed Project would only affect Parcel 1, 2, and 4, of Parcel Map No. 84-886, as shown on a Map filed in Book 198, Pages 19-20 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California.

D. The proposed Project entails, among other things, (1) Approval of Amendment Application No. 2023-04 to change the zoning designation for the property located at 601 North Fairview Street (APN: 405-241-04) from Light Industrial (M1) to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82); and (2) approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-03 to expand the boundaries of SD-82 and to allow for Administrative Offices, Surface Parking, and Private Outdoor Community Areas as a permitted use on Parcel 4, and Outdoor Play Area on Parcel 2, ancillary to the Vista Heritage Charter School. Parcel 2 and 4 are as shown on Parcel Map No. 84-886, as City Council 26 – 21 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 2 of 16 ends

shown on a Map filed in Book 198, Pages 19-20 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California.

E. The approval of the text amendments, permissible uses, and development standards are consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Industrial/Flex-1.5 (Flex 1.5) and the designated West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. On April 19, 2022, the City adopted the General Plan Update which went into effect on May 26, 2022. The Flex-1.5 land use designation encourages industrial uses that do not produce significant air pollutants including office-industrial flex spaces, small-scale clean manufacturing, among other uses. The proposed zoning amendment advances the vision for the subject site’s General Plan Focus Area and will bring the site into alignment and compliance with the General Plan through reducing and eliminating traditional heavy industrial and noxious uses currently allowable on the properties. Furthermore, the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area envisions a mixed-use corridor with a goal of transitioning out existing autooriented and traditional industrial uses to clean manufacturing and research and development uses, and live-work maker spaces that are compatible and can coexist with residential and other sensitive land uses such as schools, churches, and recreation facilities. In addition, the focus area would transition a group of auto-oriented neighborhoods and institutions into a series of transit-oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. In order to accomplish the goals of the General Plan, the focus area promotes infill development while respecting established neighborhoods and providing buffers from industrial to residential neighborhoods. The proposed project will create a buffer from industrial uses to residential by changing the use of an auto-repair building into an office space. Additionally, the proposed project proposes landscape improvements and a community garden that will further act as buffers and accomplish the goals of the General Plan.

F. The applicant has demonstrated compliance with all requirements of the Sunshine Ordinance codified at SAMC Section 2-153, including public notification and hosting of required community meetings. Materials resulting from the meetings were subsequently posted to the City’s webpage for the project.

G. On December 11, 2023, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and voted to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-03.

H. On January 16, 2024, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing and voted to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance approving Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-03.

I. For the reasons contained herein, and each of them, Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2023-3 is hereby found and determined to be consistent with the intent and purpose of Chapter 41 of the SAMC; thus, changing the City Council 26 – 22 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 3 of 16 ends

zoning district is found to be consistent with the General Plan of the City of Santa Ana and otherwise justified by the public necessity, convenience, and general welfare.

Section 2. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.

The GPU EIR evaluates the potential environmental effects associated with implementation of the GPU and addresses appropriate and feasible mitigation measures that would minimize or eliminate these impacts. A project is consistent with the GPU if its development density is the same or less than the standard expressed for the involved parcel in the general plan for which an EIR has been certified, and the project complies with the density-related standards contained in that plan. CEQA Guidelines section 15183(i)(2). Development density standards can include the number of dwelling units per City Council 26 – 23 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 4 of 16 ends

acre, the number of people in a given area, floor area ratio (FAR), and other measures of building intensity, building height, size limitations, and use restrictions. (C) The GPU identifies that the Interim Development Standard for the FLEX-1.5 area is M1. The M1 zone provides for a variety of light industrial uses, including warehousing, manufacture, assembly, machine shops, wholesale businesses and ancillary uses such as office uses that do not exceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area. The Project would result in a FAR of 0.14, which is within the projections of the GPU EIR, which evaluated a density of 1.5 FAR on the site. The GPU EIR adequately anticipated and analyzed the impacts of this Project and identified applicable mitigation measures necessary to reduce impacts of the Project, and the Project implements the applicable mitigation measures.
(D) Specifically, the Project qualifies for the exemption because the following findings can be made:

1. The Project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified.

The Project would result in a FAR of 0.14, which is less than the maximum FAR of

Page 5 of 16 ends

EIR.

5. As explained in the prepared Exemption Checklist, the Project will undertake feasible mitigation measures specified in the GPU EIR. These GPU EIR mitigation measures will be undertaken through Project design, compliance with regulations and ordinances, and through the Project’s conditions of approval. (E) The Project therefore qualifies for an exemption from additional environmental review as set forth in Public Resources Code section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. The full exemption analysis is provided in Exhibit 7 of the staff report accompanying this Ordinance. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2023-40 will be filed for this project.

Section 4. The Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) zoning document is hereby amended to read as follows:

TEMPLO CALVARIO ASSEMBLY OF GOD
Specific Development Plan No. 82
Section 1. Applicability of Ordinance
The specific development zoning district for the Templo Calvario Assembly of God Church, as authorized by Chapter 41, Division 26, Sec. 41-593 et. seq. of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC), is specifically subject to the standards and regulations contained in this plan for the express purpose of establishing land use regulations and standards. All other applicable chapters, articles and sections of the SAMC shall apply unless expressly stated or superseded by this ordinance.

Section 2. Purpose
The Specific Development Plan No. 82 (SD-82) for Templo Calvario consist of standards and regulations established for the express purpose of protecting the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the City of Santa Ana by promoting and enhancing the value of properties and encouraging orderly development of the property.

Section 3. Uses Permitted

1. The following uses are permitted in the SD-82 District:

A parcel or building within the Specific Development Plan No. 82 (SD82) shall be occupied by only the land uses allowed by this Section 3, and as permitted in created Zones, hereinafter referred to as Zone 1, Zone 2, and Zone 3 (“Zones”), as adopted and depicted in Attachment A.

City Council 26 – 25 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 6 of 16 ends

Zone 1

1. The permitted land uses within Zone 1 shall be as follows:
(a) Administrative offices.
(b) Surface parking lot for off-street parking purposes only, exclusive to Parcels 1, 2, and 4 of Parcel Map No. 84-886, as shown on a Map filed in Book 198, Pages 19-20 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County,
California, and any future adjoining parcels that may form part of the Civic Center Business Park or its future successors. (c) Private outdoor community area, to be accessible to all Zones, but shall not be used exclusively for school purposes, including but not limited to, outdoor play area, school children play area, nor for school recreational activities.

Zone 2

2. The permitted land uses within Zone 2 shall be as follows:
(a) The compounding, processing or treatment of raw or previously used materials into a finished or semi-finished product, excluding those specified in SAMC section 41-489.5.
(b) The manufacturing of products from raw or previously treated materials, excluding those specified in SAMC section 41-489.5. (c) The assembly of products from raw or previously treated materials, excluding those specified in SAMC section 41-489.5. (d) The packaging or distribution of previously prepared products or materials, excluding those specified in SAMC section 41-489.5. (e) Machine shops or other metal working shops.
(f) Warehousing
(g) Bulk product sales [twenty-five (25) cubic feet or greater] when such products are the primary sales activity.
(h) Wholesale establishments where the primary trade is businessto- business sale of products, supplies and equipment. (i) Storage of previously prepared goods, products or materials for eventual distribution or sales where the goods, products or materials are the property of the owner or operator of the City Council 26 – 26 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 7 of 16 ends

building or structure.
(j) Impound yards (storage only) with no office or dispatching operations.
(k) Laundry and dry cleaning establishments in conjunction with plant operation for such establishment on the premises. (l) Eating establishments not specified in section 41-472.5. (m) Research laboratories that do not generate hazardous waste materials.
(n) Service stations with no more than two thousand (2,000) square feet of the gross floor area devoted to non-automotive related product sales.
(o) Truck, boat and heavy equipment sales, rental, and service. (p) Movie, photography, musical or video production studios. (q) Bulk products sales [twenty-five (25) cubic feet or greater] when such products are the primary sales activity.
(r) Public utility structures.
(s) Blueprinting, photoengraving, screen printing and other reproduction processes.
(t) Wholesale nursery and plant storage.
(u) Contractor's yard.
(v) Automotive repair and service, including body and fender repair, painting, and engine replacement.
(w) Home improvement warehouse store.
(x) Sales of industrial products, supplies and equipment used for final product manufacture.
(y) Lumberyard, including mill and sash work if conducted entirely within an enclosed building.

City Council 26 – 27 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 8 of 16 ends

(z) Recycling facilities not in excess of forty-five thousand (45,000) gross square feet and in compliance with section 41-1253 of this Code including:
(aa) Small collection facilities.
(bb) Large collection facilities.
(cc) Light processing facilities.
(dd) Adult entertainment businesses, subject to compliance with the requirements of article XVII of this chapter.
(ee) Storage and distribution of hazardous materials.
(ff) Schools
The following uses are permitted when ancillary to any use permitted by section 3-1 or to any use permitted subject to a conditional use permit:
(a) Administrative office use occupying up to thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area.
(b) Product sales or service uses occupying up to five (5) percent of the gross floor area.
(c) Child care facilities occupying up to thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area; . provided, however, that no combination of uses permitted by this section shall exceed thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area.
(d) The outside storage of Class I and Class II liquids (as defined in the fire code of the City of Santa Ana) in above-ground fixed storage tanks when properly screened pursuant to section 41- 622 of the Code, as ii may be amended from time to time. As used herein, "tank" means a vessel containing more than sixty (60) gallons.
(e) Enclosed storage where the goods, materials or supplies stored are the property of the owner or operator of the building or structure occupying up to thirty (30) percent.
(f) The following uses may be permitted in the SD-82 district subject to the issuance of a conditional use permit:

City Council 26 – 28 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 9 of 16 ends

(g) Principal industrial uses if occupying less than seventy (70) percent of the gross floor area with the remainder of the floor area allocated to office use only.
(h) Storage of new or used buildings or houses.
(i) Child care facilities other than as permitted by section 41-472.1. (j) Trade schools which provide instruction which requires the operation of heavy equipment or machinery normally
associated with manufacturing operations such as
woodworking or machine shops.
(k) Kennels for the temporary care and lodging of dogs and other domesticated household animals.
(l) Eating establishments permitted in section 41-472 which operate between 12:00 and 5:00 a.m. and which are within one hundred fifty (150) feet of a residential use.
(m)Eating establishments with drive-through window service. (n) Petroleum and gas storage.
(o) Freight, bus and truck terminal.
(p) Industrial medical clinics which offer medical services by referral only and do not offer overnight stays.
(q) Administrative office use ancillary to a permitted industrial use occupying more than thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area. (r) Heavy processing recycling uses.
(s) Car wash facility.
(t) Banquet facilities as an ancillary use to a restaurant or eating establishment, subject to development and operational
standards set forth in section 41-199.1.
(u) Commercial storage not within five hundred (500) feet of an arterial street (as defined in the city's circulation element) or freeway or within one thousand (1,000) feet of a freeway intersection.

City Council 26 – 29 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 10 of 16 ends

(v) Mini-warehouse uses; provided that no conditional use permit shall be granted unless a written finding is made that the parcel on which the use is proposed is not within five hundred (500) feet of an arterial street (as defined in the city's circulation element) or freeway, or within one thousand (1,000) feet of a freeway intersection.
(w) Recreational vehicle, vehicle and/or boat storage yard; provided that no conditional use permit shall be granted unless a written finding is made that the parcel on which the use is proposed is: not within five hundred (500) feet of an arterial street (as defined in the city's circulation element) or freeway, or within one thousand (1,000) feet of a freeway intersection. (x) Data center uses; provided that no conditional use permit shall be granted unless a written finding is made that the parcel on which the use is proposed is: not within five hundred (500) feet of an arterial street (as defined in the city's circulation element) or freeway, or within one thousand (1,000) feet of a freeway intersection.
(y) Churches and ancillary church uses.

3. The following uses are permitted when ancillary to any use permitted or permitted with the approval of a conditional use permit in Zone 2:
(a) Administrative office occupying up to thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area.
(b) Product sales or service uses occupying up to five (5) percent of the gross floor area.
(c) Enclosed storage where the goods, materials or supplies stored are the property of the owner or operator of the building or structure occupying up to thirty (30) percent.

4. The following uses may be permitted in Zone 2 subject to the approval of a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 41- 638 of the SAMC:
(a) Principal industrial uses occupying less than seventy (70) percent of the gross floor area with the remainder of the floor area allocated to office use only.

City Council 26 – 30 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 11 of 16 ends

(b) Childcare facilities other than as permitted by section 41-472.1 of the SAMC.
(c) Trade schools which provide instruction which requires the operation of heavy equipment or machinery normally
associated with manufacturing operations such as
woodworking or machine shops.
(d) Industrial medical clinics which offer medical services by referral only and do not offer overnight stays.
(e) Administrative office use ancillary to a permitted industrial use occupying more than thirty (30) percent of the gross floor area.

Zone 3

5. The permitted land uses within Zone 3 shall be as follows:
(a) Schools and ancillary school uses.

6. The following uses are permitted when ancillary to any uses permitted or permitted with the approval of a conditional use permit in Zone 3:
(a) Outdoor play area, ancillary to school uses.

7. The following uses may be permitted in Zone 3 subject to the approval of a conditional use permit in accordance with Section 41- 638 of the SAMC:
(a) Churches and ancillary church uses.

Section 4. Development Standards

1. Walls and Screening. Any equipment, whether on the roof, side of building or ground, shall be screened. The method of screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building in terms of materials, color, shape and size.

2. Landscaping Standards. All landscaped areas shall be irrigated using an automatic irrigation system. The project shall provide landscaping consistent with the existing landscape theme and existing improvements on-site. A six-inch raised concrete curb shall be required around all landscape planters unless approved by the City Landscape Associate.
(a) A landscape area not less than 5 feet wide shall be maintained on the north (OCTA right-of-way) parking lot on City Council 26 – 31 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 12 of 16 ends

Fairview Street.
(b) All new landscape planters and landscaped areas shall meet the commercial landscape planter standards.
(c) Vine pockets shall be provided along the north (OCTA rightof-way) block wall every 15 feet.

3. Architectural and Design Features.
(a) Exterior Materials: Changes to the exterior materials and finishes shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. The materials and finishes shall be consistent with those found on the site.
(b) Trash Enclosure: Trash enclosures and similar ancillary structures are to match the texture, materials and color palette of the proposed buildings.
(c) Lighting Standards/Fixtures: A minimum of one-foot candle of light shall be provided throughout the parking area.

Specifications of light standards/fixtures and photometrics plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval.

4. School Operational Standards
(a) A Traffic Plan shall be submitted for review and approval. The Plan shall include specifics on school bus drop-off and pick-up areas (limited to front of building), student drop-off and pickup areas (limited to rear of building), and the driveways to be used for these functions.
(b) A Safety Plan shall be submitted for review and approval.

At a minimum, the Plan shall include provisions for student safety to the campus, during school operating hours, and safety exiting the campus.
(c) Physical education activities shall be limited to indoors only.

No activities shall be conducted outside the building. A minimum of 10 square feet of physical activity area per student shall be provided. Physical education activities shall be limited to indoors and the outdoor designated gated area.

Any changes to the designated outdoor play area shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval.

City Council 26 – 32 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 13 of 16 ends

(d) Student enrollment for the school shall be capped at a maximum of 870 students.
(e) A Parking Management Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to the start of each school year. The plan shall be submitted to Planning Staff and the community association at least 15 days prior to the start of school. The Plan shall include provisions for parking during special events at the school.
(f) The school shall submit an annual Special Events Program to Planning Staff and the community association at least 15 days prior to the start of the school year. The Program shall include provisions for notification of neighbors within SD-82, vehicle circulation, and parking during special events at the school. (g) Schools are subject to periodic review by the Planning Division to ensure compliance with the school; Operational Standards. Failure to comply with the Operational Standards may result in a review by the Planning Commission for further action.

5. Property Maintenance.
(a) Graffiti: All graffiti shall be removed from the premises within 24 hours of discovery and/or notification of graffiti on the premises.
(b) Parking Lot/Drive Aisles: Parking and driveway areas located on the parcels shall be kept in a good and clean condition.

Standards maintenance and repairs of paved surfaces shall be conducted on a regular basis. The normal cleaning and removal of refuse and trash shall occur on the premises. (c) Landscaping: All landscaping shall be maintained at all times.

Any dead or missing landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner.

Section 5. Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Reciprocal Parking and Access Agreements
(a) The CC&Rs governing the subject properties shall be refined and submitted to the City prior to permit issuance of any site improvements, included but not limited to the following:

I. Square footage addition to any of the existing buildings City Council 26 – 33 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 14 of 16 ends

II. Fences
III. Storage sheds
IV. Landscape planters
(b) A copy of a recorded and executed reciprocal parking and access agreement shall be provided to the Planning and Building Agency (PBA), prior to permit issuance of any site improvements as listed in Section 5 (a). The reciprocal parking and access agreement shall include language for reciprocal parking and access among legal Parcels 1, 2, and 4, as shown on Parcel Map No. 84-886, as shown on a Map filed in Book 198, Pages 19-20 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California. (c) Alternative to the requirements in Section 5(b), an equivalent action/document can be provided to the PBA ensuring that the subject properties meet all required off-street parking and access requirements.

Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 6. The Clerk of the Council shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law.

ADOPTED this day of , 2024.

Valerie Amezcua
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sonia R. Carvalho
City Attorney
By:

Jose Montoya
Assistant City Attorney
City Council 26 – 34 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 15 of 16 ends

AYES: Councilmembers
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers
City Council 26 – 35 1/16/2024
Ordinance No. NS-XXXX

Page 16 of 16 ends

Date: City Clerk
City of Santa Ana
City Council 26 – 36 1/16/2024
Attachment A
City Council 26 – 37 1/16/2024
11/8/23, 6:05 PM .
https://apps.spatialstream.com/landvision/production/CurrentBuild/Html/printpreview.html 1/2 AA No. 2023-04 and ZOA No. 2023-03
601 N. Fairview Street
Exhibit 3 - Vicinity Zoning and Aerial Map
© 2023 Digital Map Products. All rights reserved.

Zoning
Buffer 400 feet
City Council 26 – 38 1/16/2024
11/8/23, 6:05 PM .
https://apps.spatialstream.com/landvision/production/CurrentBuild/Html/printpreview.html 2/2 City Council 26 – 39 1/16/2024
AA No. 2023-04 and ZOA No. 2023-03 – Vista Heritage Charter School 601 North Fairview Street
Exhibit 4 – Site Photo
City Council 26 – 40 1/16/2024

DRAWIN G INDEX

PROJECT

SH DIRECTORY
T. DEVELOPER

RED HOOK CAPITAL PARTNERS
NO. DESCRIPT ION GENE RAL VISTA CHARTE R

SCHOOL PHASE IV
601 N FAIRVIEW, SANTA ANA, CA 92703 VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY A0. 1A0. 7A0. 8COVER SHEET ENRIQUE DIAZ, RA, NCARB, LEED AP BD+C, VICE PRESIDENT 2120 E GRAND AVE., SUITE 135 EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245
[T] (626) 201-4177 [email protected]

POLICE DEPARTMENT NOTES POLICE DEPARTMENT NOTES
CIVIL C1. 30 PRELIMINARY GRADING AND

STREET DRAINAGE

IMPROVEMEN TS TEN
ANT
1 2
3 STREET IMPROVEMENTS SHEET 1 OF 3 STREET
SHEET 2 OF 3 STREET IMPROVEMENTS SHEET 3 OF 3

VISTA HERITAGE

LANDS GLOBAL ACADEMY
CAPE PL1
COLLIN FELCH 2609 W 5TH STREET SANTA ANA, CA 92703
[T] (714) 988- 2719

PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
ARCHITEC TURAL CFelch@VistaC A1. harterPS.org
0A1. 1A1. 2A2. 1A4. 1A5. 1A6. 2A10 .2

SITE PLAN DEMO SITE PLAN OVERALL ENLARGED SITE PLAN FLOOR PLAN

ARCHITECT STUDIO W ARCHITECTS

ROOF PLAN COLORED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SITE SECTIONS

BRIAN WHITMORE, PRINCIPAL
1930 H STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95811
[T] (916) 254-5600

SITE DETAILS
ELECT RICAL E1.1 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN
BrianW@StudioW- E1. Architects.com 2 SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN Studio W Architects 424 32nd Street, Suite D/E Newport Beach, California 92663 [ T ] 949.774.2920

TONY PACHECO- TAYLOR, CLIENT LEADER
424 32ND STREET, SUITE D/E NEWPORT BEACH, CA
[T] (949) 774-2906 TonyP@StudioW- Architects.com
PLUMBING P0.2 TOTAL SHEET COUNT: 19

PLUMBING SCHEDULES
www.StudioW- Architects.com

CIVIL ENGINEE R
KPFF

JESUS PEREZ, PE
18400 VON KARMAN AVE., SUITE 600
IRVINE, CA 92612
[T] (949)-252-1022
[email protected] om
ARCHI TECT ENGINE LANDSCAPE EER ARCHITECT MSLA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, INC. MICHAEL SHULAR, ASLA 306 CANYON FALLS DRIVE
FOLSOM, CA 95630
No. C 30345
Ren. [T] (916) 9//30/235 989-3372 MShular@MSL Adesign.com

SURVEY ENGINEER

ROSELL SURVEYIN G
DATE SIIGNED: 0190/018/2023

1. This sheet is part of a set and
is not to be used alone. 2. This sheet is not to be used for construction unless the architect's stamp and signature appear on
the drawings and the status box
indicated drawings have been
released for construction. 3. These plans and prints thereof, as instruments of service, are owned by the architect and are for use on this project only. Reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of the architect is forbidden.
2961 MACARTHUR BLVD., SUITE 214 SANTA ANA, CA 92704 PROJEC [T] (714) 934-4500 T DATA 4. Copyright Studio W Associates, Inc. 2022.

ADDRESS: 601 N FAIRVIEWSANTA ANA, CA 92703 APN: 405- 241-04 NO . REM ARKS DATE ZONING DISTRICT: M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: M-1 SITE AREA: 39,437 SF / 0.905 ACRES TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 5837 SF - BUILDING 1 - FIRST FLOOR AREA 5837 SF - TOTAL BUILDING AREA FLOOR AREA (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) RATIO (FAR): 5837 SF / 39,437 SF = 15% DA
TE BUILDING USE (PROPOSED): ADMINISTRATION (OCCUPANCY B) AND ASSEMBLY (OCCUPANCY A-3) DSA PLAN DSA CHECK BACK CHECK

BIDDING
PARKING SPACES (PROPOSED): ON-SITE PARKING:6532 STAALLSS(INCLUDES 3 ACCESSIBLE STALLS) CONSTR UCTION PROJECT VICINIT NARRATIVE Y MAP KEY

THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A CHANGE OF PLAN
ZONING FOR VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACADEMY WITHIN THE M-1 ZONING DISTRICT. THIS APPLICATION SEEKS APPROVAL FOR A TENANT IMPROVEMENT TO AN EXISTING 5,764 SF OF FLOOR AREA TO REMAIN WITH THE ADDITION OF A 440 SF MEZZANINE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE OF 15% TO REMAIN.

PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK THE SCOPE OF WORK INCLUDES TENANT IMPROVEMENT OF EXISTING 1-STORY, 5764 SF, SPRINKLERED BUILDING WITH ADDITION OF A MEZZANINE LEVEL. EXISTING BUILDING CHANGE OF USE REQUIRED FROM AUTOMOTIVE SHOP TO BUSINESS TO BE USED AS ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING FOR VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL. PROJECT TO INCLUDE DEVELOPMENT OF ADJACENT SITE TO ACCOMODATE 60' X 105' ARTIFICIAL TURF FIELD, STUDENT OUTDOOR LEARNING, TRASH ENCLOSURE, NEW PARKING SPACES, STUDENT DROP-OFF, AND OTHER ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS.

VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACA
DEM Y
PROJEC T SITE 601 N FAIRVIE W, SANTA ANA, CA 92703
2609 W 5TH STREET
SANTA ANA, CA 92703

CODES AND

APPLICABLE STATE CODES AND REGULATIONS
REGULATIONS WITH LATEST AMENDMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTS: CONDITION

AL USE PERMIT

1. 2. 2022 BUILDING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PART 1, TITLE 24 CCR 2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC), PART 2, TITLE 24 CCR (2018 IBC & CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS)

3. 4.

5. 2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC), PART 3, TITLE 24 CCR (2017 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE & CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC), PART 4, TITLE 24 CCR (2018 UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE & CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 2022 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC), PART 5, TITLE 24 CCR (2018 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE & CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, PART 6, TITLE 24 CBSC 2022 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE, PART 8, TITLE 24 CCR 2022 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, PART 9, TITLE 24 CCR (2018 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE & CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS)

VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL
PHASE
IV 601 N FAIRVIEW, SANTA ANA, CA
92703

6. 7. 8.

9. 2022 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE (CEBC), PART 10, TITLE 24 CCR (2018 INTERNATIONAL EXISTING BUILDING CODE & CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 10. 11. 12. 13. 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE PART 11, TITLE 24 2022 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS, PART 12, TITLE 24 CCR TITLE 8 CCR, CH. 4, SUB-CH. 6 - ELEVATOR SAFETY ORDERS TITLE 19 CCR, PUBLIC SAFETY, SFM REGULATIONS COVE R SHEET APPLICABLE FEDERAL CODES AND STANDARDS: 14. 15. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), TITLE 11 UNIFORM FEDERAL ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS (UFAS) or ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN (APPENDIX A OF 28 CFR PART 36) APPLICABLE REFERENCED STANDARDS: Date 190/01/ 2023
Project Number
22037

16. NFPA 13, STANDARD FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SPRINKLER SYSTEMS (CA AMENDED), 2019 EDITION NFPA 24, PRIVATE FIRE MAINS (CA AMENDED), 2019 EDITION NFPA 72, NATIONAL FIRE ALARM CODE (CA AMENDED), 2019 EDITION NFPA 80, FIRE DOOR AND OTHER OPENING PROTECTIVES, 2019 EDITION NFPA 2001, CLEAN AGENT FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS, 2018 EDITION N 17. 18. 19. 20. Application Number XX- XXXXXX
Drawing Number
A

0. 1
REFERENCE CODE SECTION FOR NFPA STANDARDS - 2019 CBC (SFM) CHAPTER 80. SEE CHAPTER 80 FOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS TO NFPA STANDARDS.

Dra
wn
Chec
Aut ked
hor Chec ker
City Council 26 – 41 1/16/2024
POLICE DEPARTMENT NOTES: A MAXIMUM 1/4-INCH MESH. THE POLYCARBONATE AND ACRYLIC MUST BY THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY. FURTHER, A DUAL LOCKING MECHANISM, CONSTRUCTED SO THAT BOTH DEADBOLT AND LATCH CAN BE RETRACTED BY A SINGLE ACTION OF THE INSIDE DOOR KNOB OR LEVER, MAY BE UTILIZED PROVIDED IT MEETS ALL OTHER SPECIFICATIONS FOR LOCKING DEVICES.

B. IRON OR STEEL GRILLS OF AT LEAST ONE-EIGHTH (1/8) INCH NONREMOVA BLE BOLTS. NONREMOVA DIVISION 3. BUILDING BLE BOLTS. SECURITY REGULATIONS SEC. 8-200. APPLICATION AND SCOPE.

HAVE A MINIMUM 1/2-INCH THICKNESS. THE PURPOSE OF THE COVER IS TO DISCOURAGE THE WILLFUL DESTRUCTION OF THE LIGHT SOURCE. VISIBILITY CORRIDOR IS AN OPENING OF AT LEAST A TEN-INCH SQUARE AND SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF THIRTY-SIX (36) INCHES AND NOT TO EXCEED FIFTY (50) INCHES ABOVE GROUND LEVEL. WINDOW ASSEMBLY IS A UNIT COMPOSED OF A GROUP OF PARTS ORCOMPONENTS WHICH MAKE UP A CLOSURE FOR AN OPENING IN A WALL OR ROOF (INCLUDING THE ANCHORAGE) TO CONTROL LIGHT, AIR, AND OTHER ELEMENTS. WINDOW FRAME IS THAT PART OF A WINDOW WHICH SURROUNDS AND SUPPORTS THE SASHES AND IS ATTACHED TO THE SURROUNDING WALL. THE MEMBERS INCLUDE SIDE JAMBS (VERTICAL), HEAD JAMB (UPPER, HORIZONTAL), SILL AND MULLIONS. (ORD. NO. NS-1424, § 1, 6-5-78; ORD. NO. NS-1436, § 1, 8-21-78; ORD. NO. 1794, § 2, 10-14-85)MESH SECURED WITH NONREMOVABLE BOLTS ON THE INSIDE OF THE GLAZING MAY BE UTILIZED; AND FRAMING FOR IRON OR STEEL GRILLS SHALL BE BY ONE (1) INCH BY ONE- FOURTH (1/4) INCH FLAT METAL SECURED BY NONREMOVABLE BOLTS; OR C. OUTSIDE HINGES ON ALL HATCHWAY OPENINGS SHALL BEC. OUTSIDE HINGES ON ALL HATCHWAY OPENINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH NONREMOVABLE PINS WHEN USING PIN-TYPE HINGES.

PROVIDED WITH NONREMOVABLE PINS WHEN USING PIN-TYPE HINGES. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECURITY ORDINANCE SHALL APPLY TO ALL ACTIVITIES FOR WHICH A BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED. ADDITIONS, ALTERATIONS AND REPAIRS: FIFTY (50) PERCENT MORE OF THE BUILDING'S CURRENT VALUATION. WHEN ADDITIONS, ALTERATIONS OR REPAIRS WITHIN ANY TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD EXCEED FIFTY (50) PERCENT OF THE VALUE OF ANY EXISTING BUILDING OR STRUCTURE, EACH BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SHALL BE MADE TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW BUILDINGS ORSTRUCTURES. ALL APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL FIRE CODES MUST BE ADHERED TO. NO PORTION OF THIS DIVISION SHALL SUPERSEDE ANY LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, REGULATIONS OR CODES. (ORD. NO. NS-1424, § 1, 6-5-78; ORD. NO. NS-1794, § 1, 10-14-85) SEC. 8-201. DEFINITIONS OF TECHNICAL TERMS. (1) ALL AIR DUCT OR AIR VENT OPENINGS EXCEEDING NINETY- SIX(1) ALL AIR DUCT OR AIR VENT OPENINGS EXCEEDING NINETY- SIX (D) FOR EXTERIOR SWINGING DOORS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: (1) DOOR JAMBS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH SOLID BACKING IN

INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF FRAMES AND JAMBS
C. THE GLAZING SHALL BE COVERED WITH IRON OR STEEL BARS (96) SQUARE INCHES ON THE ROOF OR EXTERIOR WALLS OF ANY COMMERCIAL BUILDING SHALL BE SECURED BY COVERING SAME WITH EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING:(96) SQUARE INCHES ON THE ROOF OR EXTERIOR WALLS OF ANY COMMERCIAL BUILDING SHALL BE SECURED BY COVERING SAME WITH EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING:

OF AT LEAST ONE-HALF (1/2) INCH ROUND OR ONE (1) INCH BY ONE- FOURTH (1 X 1/4) INCH FLAT METAL, SPACED NOT MORE THAN FIVE (5) INCHES APART AND SECURED WITH NONREMOVABLE BOLTS.

SUCH A MANNER THAT NO VOIDS EXIST BETWEEN THE STRIKE SIDE OF THE JAMB AND THE FRAME OPENING FOR A VERTICAL DISTANCE OF SIX (6) INCHES EACH SIDE OF THE STRIKE. FINGER JOINTS ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN TWELVE (12) INCHES VERTICALLY OF ANY LOCKING DEVICE.

A. IRON OR STEEL BARS OF AT LEAST ONE-HALF (1/2) INCHA. IRON OR STEEL BARS OF AT D. ITEMS B. AND C. ABOVE SHALL LEAST ONE-HALF (1/2) INCH NOT INTERFERE WITH THE ROUND OR ONE BY ONE-FOURTH (1 X 1/4) INCH FLAT METAL SPACED NO MORE THAN FIVE (5) INCHES APART AND SECURELY FASTENED; OR ROUND OR ONE BY ONE-FOURTH (1 X 1/4) INCH FLAT METAL SPACED NO MORE THAN FIVE (5) INCHES APART AND SECURELY FASTENED; OR OPERATION OF OPENING WINDOWS IF SUCH WINDOWS ARE REQUIRED TO BE OPENABLE BY THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. (B) ALUMINUM FRAME SWINGING DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED AS FOLLOWS:

B. IRON OR STEEL GRILLS OF AT LEAST ONE-EIGHTH (1/8) INCHB. IRON OR STEEL GRILLS OF AT ALL SWINGING EXTERIOR LEAST ONE-EIGHTH (1/8) INCH

DOORS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF
METAL WITH A MAXIMUM TWO (2) INCH MESH AND SECURELY FASTENED.METAL WITH A MAXIMUM TWO (2)

INCH MESH AND SECURELY
FASTENED. (2) IN WOOD FRAMING, HORIZONTAL BETWEEN STUDS AT DOOR LOCK BLOCKING SHALL BE PLACED HEIGHT FOR THREE (3) STUD SPACES EACH SIDE OF THE DOOR OPENINGS. TRIMMERS SHALL BE FULL LENGTH FROM THE HEADS TO THE FLOOR WITH SOLID BACKING AGAINST SOLES PLATES.

C. WITH BOLTS WHICH ARE NONREMOVABLE FROM THE EXTERIOR. D. THE ABOVE MUST NOT INTERFERE WITH VENTING

IF THE BARRIER IS ON THE OUTSIDE, IT SHALL BE SECURED
C. WITH BOLTS WHICH ARE NONREMOVABLE FROM THE EXTERIOR. D. THE ABOVE MUST NOT

INTERFERE WITH VENTING

IF THE BARRIER IS ON THE
(1) A SINGLE OR DOUBLE DOOR OUTSIDE, IT SHALL BE SECURED DOUBLE OR SINGLE CYLINDER SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A DEADBOLT. THE BOLT SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM PROJECTION OF ONE (1) INCH AND BE CONSTRUCTED SO AS TO REPEAL CUTTING TOOL ATTACK. THE DEADBOLT SHALL HAVE AN EMBEDMENT OF AT LEAST THREE- FOURTHS (3/4) INCH INTO THE STRIKE RECEIVING THE PROJECTED BOLT. THE CYLINDER SHALL HAVE A CYLINDER GUARD, A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) PIN TUMBLERS, AND SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE INNER PORTION OF THE LOCK BY CONNECTING SCREWS OF AT LEAST ONE-FOURTH (1/4) INCH IN DIAMETER. ALL DEADBOLTS WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH A LOCKED INDICATOR. EXPOSED INSTALLATION SCREWS ON DOUBLE CYLINDER DEADBOLTS SHALL BE NONREMOVABLE. THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SUBSECTION DO NOT APPLY WHERE (1) PANIC HARDWARE IS REQUIRED, OR (2) AN EQUIVALENT DEVICE IS APPROVED BY THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY. LOCKING DEVICES SHALL BE MOUNTED AT A HEIGHT OF NOT LESS THAN THIRTY (30) NOR MORE THAN FORTY-FOUR (44) INCHES ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR.

THE FOLLOWING TERMS USED IN THIS DIVISION SHALL HAVE THE MEANINGS INDICATED BELOW:REQUIREMENTS, CREATING POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS TO HEALTH AND SAFETY, OR CONFLICT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE OR TITLE 19, CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.REQUIREMENTS, CREATING POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS TO HEALTH AND SAFETY, OR CONFLICT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE OR TITLE 19, CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.

SEC. 8-202. DEFINITION OF "ENFORCING AUTHORITY". AS USED IN THIS DIVISION, THE TERM "ENFORCING AUTHORITY" SHALL MEAN THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND HIS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES. (ORD. NO. NS-1424, § 1, 6-5-78; ORD. NO. NS-1794, § 3, 10-14-85; ORD. NO. NS-1900, § 6, 6-1-87)(E) THE INACTIVE LEAF OF DOUBLE APPROVED MEANS CERTIFIED AS DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS DIVISION BY THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY OR HIS AUTHORIZED AGENTS, OR BY OTHER OFFICIALS DESIGNATED BY THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY TO GIVE APPROVAL ON A PARTICULAR MATTER DEALT WITH BY THE PROVISIONS OF THIS DIVISION WITH REGARD TO A GIVEN MATERIAL, MODE OF CONSTRUCTION, PIECE OF EQUIPMENT OR DEVICE. AUXILIARY LOCKING DEVICE IS A SECONDARY LOCKING SYSTEM ADDED TO THE PRIMARY LOCKING SYSTEM TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SECURITY.

WITH METAL FLUSHBOLT(S) HAVING A MINIMUM EMBEDMENT OF FIVE- EIGHTHS (5/8) INCH INTO THE HEAD AND THRESHOLD OF THE DOOR FRAME. (K) PERMANENTLY AFFIXED LADDERS LEADING TO ROOFS SHALL(K) PERMANENTLY AFFIXED LADDERS LEADING TO ROOFS SHALL (F) GLAZING IN EXTERIOR DOORS OR WITHIN FORTY (40) INCHES BE FULLY ENCLOSED WITH SHEET METAL TO A HEIGHT OF TEN (10) FEET. THIS COVERING SHALL BE LOCKED AGAINST THE LADDER WITH A CASE HARDENED HASP, SECURED WITH NONREMOVABLE SCREWS OR BOLTS AND A PADLOCK WITH A MINIMUM THREE-EIGHTH (3/8) INCH HARDENED STEEL SHACKLE, LOCKING AT BOTH HEEL AND TOE, AND A MINIMUM FIVE (5) PIN TUMBLER OPERATION WITH NONREMOVABLE KEY WHEN IN AN UNLOCKED POSITION. HINGES ON THE COVER WILL BE PROVIDED WITH NONREMOVABLE PINS WHEN USING PIN-TYPE HINGES.

BE FULLY ENCLOSED WITH SHEET METAL TO A HEIGHT OF TEN (10) FEET. THIS COVERING SHALL BE LOCKED AGAINST THE LADDER WITH A CASE HARDENED HASP, SECURED WITH NONREMOVABLE SCREWS OR BOLTS AND A PADLOCK WITH A MINIMUM THREE-EIGHTH (3/8) INCH HARDENED STEEL SHACKLE, LOCKING AT BOTH HEEL AND TOE, AND A MINIMUM FIVE (5) PIN TUMBLER OPERATION WITH NONREMOVABLE KEY WHEN IN AN UNLOCKED POSITION. HINGES ON THE COVER WILL BE PROVIDED WITH NONREMOVABLE PINS WHEN USING PIN-TYPE HINGES.

OF A DOOR LOCKING MECHANISM SHALL BE OF FULLY TEMPERED GLASS OR RATED BURGLARY RESISTANCE GLAZING.

SEC. 8-203. ENFORCEMENT. THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY IS HEREBY EMPOWERED AND DIRECTED TO ADMINISTER AND ENFORCE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS DIVISION RELATING TO PHYSICAL SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR BUILDINGS IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION MUST BE APPROVED, BY THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS DIVISION. NO BUILDING PERMIT IS TO BE FINALLY APPROVED OR UTILITY RELEASE GIVEN UNLESS THE APPLICANT FOR SAID PERMIT OR RELEASE HAS SATISFIED THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY THAT APPLICANT HAS COMPLIED WITH THIS DIVISION. (G) HINGES FOR OUTSWINGING EQUIPPED WITH NONREMOVABLE EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE HINGE PINS OR A MECHANICAL INTERLOCK TO PRECLUDE REMOVAL OF THE DOOR FROM THE EXTERIOR BY REMOVING THE HINGE PINS. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL ALSO APPLY TO EXTERIOR HINGES ON ANY SWINGING DOOR WHICH LEADS FROM A GARAGE INTO A RESIDENCE.

BOLT IS A METAL BAR WHICH, WHEN ACTUATED, IS PROJECTED (OR "THROWN") EITHER HORIZONTALLY OR VERTICALLY INTO A RETAINING MEMBER, SUCH AS A STRIKE PLATE, TO PREVENT A DOOR FROM MOVING OR OPENING. BOLT PROJECTION (OR BOLT THROW) IS THE DISTANCE FROM THE EDGE OF THE DOOR, AT THE BOLT CENTER LINE, TO THE FARTHEST POINT ON THE BOLT IN THE PROJECTED POSITION, WHEN SUBJECTED TO END PRESSURE. BURGLARY RESISTANT GLAZING MEANS THOSE MATERIALS AS DEFINED IN UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES BULLETIN 972. COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDING IS A BUILDING, OR PORTION THEREOF, USED FOR A PURPOSE OTHER THAN DWELLING. COMPONENT, AS DISTINGUISHED FROM A PART, IS A SUBASSEMBLY WHICH COMBINES WITH OTHER COMPONENTS TO MAKE UP A TOTAL DOOR OR WINDOW ASSEMBLY. FOR EXAMPLE, THE PRIMARY COMPONENTS OF A DOOR ASSEMBLY INCLUDE: DOOR, LOCK, HINGES, JAMB/WALL, JAMB/STRIKE AND WALL. CYLINDER IS THE SUBASSEMBLY OF A LOCK CONTAINING THE CYLINDER CORE, TUMBLER MECHANISM AND THE KEYWAY. A DOUBLE CYLINDER LOCK IS ONE WHICH HAS A KEY-ACTUATED CYLINDER ON BOTH THE EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR OF THE DOOR. (H) STRIKEPLATES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MINIMUM SIXTEEN(L) A BUILDING LOCATED WITHIN EIGHT (8) FEET OF UTILITY(L) A BUILDING LOCATED WITHIN EIGHT (8) FEET OF UTILITY Studio W Architects 424 32nd Street, Suite D/E Newport Beach, California 92663 [ T ] 949.774.2920
(16) U.S. GAUGE STEEL, BRONZE OR BRASS A MINIMUM OF THREE AND ONE-HALF (3 1/2) INCHES IN LENGTH AND SECURED TO THE JAMB WITH SCREWS A MINIMUM OF TWO AND ONE-HALF (2 1/2) INCHES IN LENGTH. (2) HINGES FOR OUTSHOWING DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH
POLES, TREES OR SIMILAR STRUCTURES WHICH ALLOW ACCESS TO THE BUILDING'S ROOF, WINDOWS OR OTHER OPENINGS SHALL HAVE SUCH ACCESS AREA BARRICADED OR FENCED WITH MATERIALS TO DETER HUMAN CLIMBING.POLES, TREES OR SIMILAR STRUCTURES WHICH ALLOW ACCESS TO

THE BUILDING'S ROOF, WINDOWS OR OTHER OPENINGS SHALL HAVE

SUCH ACCESS AREA BARRICADED OR FENCED WITH MATERIALS TO DETER HUMAN CLIMBING.

NONREMOVABLE HINGE PINS OR A MECHANICAL INTERLOCK TO PRECLUDE REMOVAL OF THE DOOR FROM THE EXTERIOR BY REMOVING THE HINGE PINS. (ORD. NO. NS- 1794, § 4, 10-14-85) (I) ALL FRONT EXTERIOR DOORS SEC. 8-204. SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES.

WIDE ANGLE ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY (180) DEGREE DOOR VIEWER, EXCEPT WHERE CLEAR VISION PANELS ARE INSTALLED. (3) WHENEVER A MAIL SLOT IS LOCATED WITHIN FORTY (40) (M) MARKINGS SHALL APPLY TO COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS: (1) THE ADDRESS NUMBER OF EVERY COMMERCIAL BUILDING SHALL BE LOCATED AND DISPLAYED SO THAT IT SHALL BE EASILY VISIBLE FROM THE STREET. THE NUMERALS IN THESE NUMBERS SHALL BE NO LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT AND BE OF A COLOR CONTRASTING TO THE BACKGROUND. IN ADDITION, ANY BUSINESS WHICH AFFORDS VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE REAR THROUGH ANY DRIVEWAY, ALLEYWAY OR PARKING LOT SHALL ALSO DISPLAY THE SAME NUMBERS ON THE REAR OF THE BUILDING.

THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS FOR LIGHTING AND ADDRESS
(M) MARKINGS SHALL APPLY TO COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS:
(1) THE ADDRESS NUMBER OF EVERY COMMERCIAL BUILDING

SHALL BE LOCATED AND DISPLAYED SO THAT IT SHALL BE EASILY VISIBLE FROM THE STREET. THE NUMERALS IN THESE NUMBERS
SHALL BE NO LESS THAN SIX (6)
INCHES IN HEIGHT AND BE OF A COLOR CONTRASTING TO THE BACKGROUND. IN ADDITION, ANY

BUSINESS WHICH AFFORDS VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE REAR

THROUGH ANY DRIVEWAY, ALLEYWAY OR PARKING LOT SHALL ALSO DISPLAY THE SAME NUMBERS ON THE REAR OF THE BUILDING.

THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS FOR LIGHTING AND ADDRESS www.StudioW- Architects.com IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON, FIRM OR CORPORATION TO ERECT, CONSTRUCT, ENLARGE, MOVE, IMPROVE, CONVERT, EQUIP, USE, OCCUPY OR MAINTAIN ANY BUILDING OR STRUCTURE IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA OR CAUSE THE SAME TO BE DONE, CONTRARY TO OR IN VIOLATION OF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS DIVISION. (ORD. NO. NS-1424, § 1, 6-5-78) SEC. 8-205. ALTERNATE MATERIALS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION. MATERIALS, METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION OR STRUCTURAL DESIGN LIMITATIONS PROVIDED FOR IN THIS DIVISION ARE TO BE USED UNLESS AN EXCEPTION IS GRANTED. THE USE OF ANY MATERIAL OR METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION NOT SPECIFICALLY PRESCRIBED BY THIS DIVISION MAY BE ALLOWED, PROVIDED ANY SUCH ALTERNATE METHOD OR MATERIAL HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY PRIOR TO USE. FURTHER, OTHER SOUND METHODS OF STRUCTURAL DESIGN OR ANALYSIS NOT SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED FOR IN THIS DIVISION MAY BEALLOWED PROVIDED SUCH ALTERNATIVE HAS BEEN APPROVED BYTHE ENFORCING AUTHORITY PRIOR TO USE. THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY MAY APPROVE ANY SUCH ALTERNATE PROVIDED THAT THEY FIND THE PROPOSED DESIGN TO BE SATISFACTORY AND THE MATERIAL AND METHOD OF WORK OFFERED IS FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED, AT LEAST EQUIVALENT TO THAT PRESCRIBED IN THIS DIVISION IN QUALITY, STRENGTH, EFFECTIVENESS, CRIME RESISTANCE, DURABILITY AND SAFETY. (ORD. NO. NS-1424, § 1, 6-5-78) INCHES OF THE PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE ON ANY EXTERIOR DOOR IT SHALL BE COVERED BY AN INTERIOR HOOD WHICH WILL DISCOURAGE MANIPULATION OF THE PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE. (J) WHEN PANIC HARDWARE IS BUILDING CODE OR TITLE 24, REQUIRED BY THE UNIFORM CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, ITSHALL BE EQUIPPED AND INSTALLED AS FOLLOWS:
(4) STRIKEPLATES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF MINIMUM SIXTEEN (1) PANIC HARDWARE SHALL CONTAIN A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) (16) U.S. GAUGE STEEL, BRONZE OR BRASS, A MINIMUM OF THREE AND ONE-HALF (3 1/2) INCHES IN LENGTH AND SECURED TO THE JAMB WITH SCREWS A MINIMUM OF TWO AND ONE-HALF (2 1/2) INCHES IN LENGTH. (C) FOLLOWS:

LOCKING POINTS ON EACH DOOR, ONE (1) LOCATED AT THE HEADER, THE OTHER AT THE THRESHOLD OF THE DOOR; OR (2) ON SINGLE DOORS, PANIC HARDWARE MAY HAVE ONE (1) ALL EXTERIOR DOUBLE DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED AS LOCKING POINT WHICH IS NOT TO BE LOCATED AT EITHER THE TOP OR BOTTOM RAILS OF THE DOOR FRAME. THE DOOR SHALL HAVE AN ASTRAGAL CONSTRUCTED OF STEEL .125 INCHES THICK WHICH SHALL BE ATTACHED WITH NONREMOVABLE BOLTS OR WELDED TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE DOOR. THE ASTRAGAL SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) INCHES VERTICALLY ABOVE AND BELOW THE LATCH OF THE PANIC HARDWARE. THE ASTRAGAL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) INCHES WIDE AND EXTEND A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) INCH BEYOND THE EDGE OF THE DOOR. (1) THE INACTIVE LEAF OF DOUBLE DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED (2) ALL EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A LIGHTING(2) ALL EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE WITH AUTOMATIC RELEASING METAL EQUIPPED WITH A LIGHTING FLUSHBOLTS HAVING A MINIMUM EMBEDMENT OF FIVE-EIGHTHS (5/8) INCH INTO THE HEADER AND THRESHOLD OF THE DOOR FRAME OR BY PANIC HARDWARE WHICH CONTAINS A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) LOCKING POINTS, ONE (1) LOCATED AT THE HEADER THE OTHER AT THE THRESHOLD OF EACH DOOR.

DEVICE WHICH SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM MAINTAINED ONE (1) FOOTCANDLE OF LIGHT AT GROUND LEVEL DURING HOURS OF DARKNESS. LIGHTING DEVICES SHALL BE PROTECTED BY VANDAL RESISTANT COVERS.DEVICE WHICH SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM MAINTAINED ONE (1) FOOTCANDLE OF LIGHT AT GROUND LEVEL DURING HOURS OF DARKNESS. LIGHTING DEVICES SHALL BE PROTECTED BY VANDAL RESISTANT COVERS.

CYLINDER CORE OR CYLINDER PLUG IS THE CENTRAL PART OF A CYLINDER CONTAINING THE KEYWAY, WHICH IS ROTATED BY THE KEY TO OPERATE THE LOCK MECHANISM. CYLINDER GUARD IS A HARDENED METAL RING OR PLATE SURROUNDING THE OTHERWISE EXPOSED PORTION OF A CYLINDER LOCK TO RESIST CUTTING, DRILLING, PRYING, PULLING, OR WRENCHING WITH COMMON TOOLS. (3) ALL PARKING LOTS, AND ACCESS THERETO, PROVIDING MORE(3) ALL PARKING LOTS, AND ACCESS (2) DOUBLE DOORS SHALL HAVE A THERETO, PROVIDING MORE
FULL LENGTH ASTRAGAL, THAN TEN (10) PARKING SPACES AND FOR USE BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A MINIMUM MAINTAINED ONE (1) FOOTCANDLE OF LIGHT ON THE PARKING SURFACE FROM DUSK UNTIL THE TERMINATION OF BUSINESS EVERY OPERATING DAY. AT ALL OTHER HOURS OF DARKNESS, A MINIMUM MAINTAINED .25 THAN TEN (10) PARKING SPACES AND FOR USE BY THE GENERAL PUBLIC, SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A MINIMUM MAINTAINED ONE (1) FOOTCANDLE OF LIGHT ON THE PARKING SURFACE FROM DUSK UNTIL THE TERMINATION OF BUSINESS EVERY OPERATING DAY. AT ALL OTHER HOURS OF DARKNESS, A MINIMUM MAINTAINED .25 CONSTRUCTED OF STEEL A MINIMUM OF .125 INCH THICK WHICH WILL COVER THE OPENING BETWEEN THE DOORS. THE ASTRAGAL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) INCHES WIDE, AND EXTENT A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) INCH BEYOND THE EDGE OF THE DOOR TO WHICH IT IS ATTACHED. THE ASTRAGAL SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE ACTIVE DOOR BY MEANS OF WELDING OR WITH NONREMOVABLE BOLTS SPACED APART ON NOT MORE THAN TEN (10) INCH CENTERS.

ARCHI TECT ENGIN (3) FULL LENGTH STEEL ASTRAGAL DOUBLE DOORS CONTAINING PANIC HARDWARE SHALL HAVE A EER ATTACHED TO THE DOORS AT THEIR MEETING POINT WHICH WILL CLOSE THE OPENING BETWEEN THEM BUT NOT INTERFERE WITH THE OPERATION OF EITHER DOOR.

DEADBOLT IS A LOCK BOLT WHICH DOES NOT HAVE A SPRING ACTION AS OPPOSED TO A LATCH BOLT, WHICH DOES. THE BOLT MUST BE ACTUATED BY A KEY AND/OR A KNOB OR THUMB TURN AND WHEN PROJECTED BECOMES LOCKED AGAINST RETURN BY END PRESSURE. DEAD LATCH IS A SPRING ACTUATED LATCH BOLT HAVING A BEVELED END AND INCORPORATING A PLUNGER WHICH, WHEN DEPRESSED, AUTOMATICALLY LOCKS THE PROJECTED LATCH BOLT AGAINST RETURN BY END PRESSURE. DOOR ASSEMBLY MEANS A UNIT COMPOSED OF A GROUP OF PARTS OR COMPONENTS WHICH MAKE UP A CLOSURE FOR A PASSAGEWAY THROUGH A WALL. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS DIVISION, A DOOR ASSEMBLY CONSISTS OF THE FOLLOWING PARTS: DOORS, HINGES, LOCKING DEVICE OR DEVICES; OPERATION CONTRACTS (SUCH AS HANDLES, KNOBS, PUSH PLATES); MISCELLANEOUS HARDWARE AND CLOSURES; THE FRAME, INCLUDING THE HEAD, THRESHOLD, AND JAMBS PLUS THE ANCHORAGE DEVICES TO THE SURROUNDING WALL AND A PORTION OF THE SURROUNDING WALL EXTENDING THIRTY-SIX (36) INCHES FROM EACH SIDE OF THE JAMBS AND SIXTEEN (16) INCHES ABOVE THE HEAD.FOOTCANDLES OF LIGHT SHALL BE PROVIDED AT GROUND LEVEL. FOOTCANDLES OF LIGHT SHALL BE (K) PROVIDED AT GROUND LEVEL. APPLY TO RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS: (1) ALL RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES SHALL DISPLAY A STREET THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS FOR ADDRESS MARKINGS SHALL (4) EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL NOT SHINE AWAY FROM SUBJECT (4) EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL NOT PROPE SHINE AWAY FROM SUBJECT RTY. PROPE RTY. No. C 30345 Ren. 9//30/235
(D) ALUMINUM FRAME SWINGING DOORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE (N)

INTERIOR NIGHT LIGHTING SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN THOSE
(N
)
INTERIOR NIGHT LIGHTING SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN THOSE NUMBER IN A PROMINENT POSITION SO THAT IT SHALL BE EASILY VISIBLE FROM THE STREET. THE NUMBERS SHALL BE FOUR (4) INCHES IN HEIGHT, OF A COLOR CONTRASTING TO THE BACKGROUND AND LOCATED SO THEY MAY BE CLEARLY SEEN AND READ. IF THE STRUCTURE HAS REAR VEHICLE ACCESS, NUMBERS SHALL BE PLACED THERE AS WELL.

FOLLO WING: (1)AREAS THAT ARE VISIBLE FROM THE STREET (GROUND FLOORS ONLY).AREAS THAT ARE VISIBLE FROM THE STREET (GROUND FLOORS ONLY). THE JAMB ON ALL ALUMINUM SEC. 8-206. FRAME SWINGING DOORS SHALL APPEALS. BE SO CONSTRUCTED OR PROTECTED TO WITHSTAND ONE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED (1,600) POUNDS OF PRESSURE IN BOTH A VERTICAL DISTANCE OF THREE (3) INCHES AND A HORIZONTAL DISTANCE OF ONE (1) INCH EACH SIDE OF THE STRIKE, SO AS TO PREVENT VIOLATION OF THE STRIKE. (O) ALL EXTERIOR BLOCK WALL FENCING SHALL HAVE INTERVALS(O ) ALL EXTERIOR BLOCK WALL THE UNIFORM CODE APPEALS BOARD FENCING SHALL HAVE INTERVALS SHALL HAVE THE POWER AND BE REQUIRED TO HEAR APPEALS REGARDING DETERMINATION OF THE SUITABILITY OF ALTERNATE MATERIALS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION, AND TO PROVIDE FOR REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS DIVISION IN THE EVENT OF A DISPUTE. (ORD. NO. NS-1424, § 1, 6-5-78; ORD. NO. NS-1596, § 3, 9-8-81) CROSS REFERENCE(S)--UNIFORM CODE APPEALS BOARD ESTABLISHED, § 2-450 PROVIDING VISIBILITY CORRIDORS WHICH WILL ALLOW VISIBILITY OF THE INTERIOR FROM OUTSIDE THE WALL, AND THESE VISIBILITY CORRIDORS SHALL BE PLACED AT REGULAR INTERVALS. THIS APPLIES ONLY TO BLOCK WALLS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET.PROVIDING VISIBILITY CORRIDORS WHICH WILL ALLOW VISIBILITY OF THE INTERIOR FROM OUTSIDE THE WALL, AND THESE VISIBILITY CORRIDORS SHALL BE PLACED AT REGULAR INTERVALS. THIS APPLIES ONLY TO BLOCK WALLS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET.

DATE SIIGNED: 0190/018/2023 (2) AT EACH DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TO A MULTIPLE- FAMILY DWELLING COMPLEX OR A PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY WHICH HAS ACCESS FROM A PUBLIC ROADWAY, THERE SHALL BE AN ILLUMINATED DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION (PLOT PLAN) OF THE COMPLEX WHICH SHOWS THE LOCATION OF THE VIEWER AND THE BUILDING UNITS WITHIN THE COMPLEX. (2) ALUMINUM FRAME SWINGING DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED (P) PASSENGER ELEVATORS, THE INTERIORS OF WHICH ARE NOT (P) PASSENGER ELEVATORS, THE
INTERIORS OF WHICH ARE NOT 1. This sheet is part of a set and is not to be used alone. 2. This sheet is not to be used for construction unless the architect's stamp and signature appear on
the drawings and the status box
indicated drawings have been
released for construction. 3. These plans and prints thereof, as instruments of service, are owned by the architect and are for use on this project only. Reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of the architect is forbidden.

WITH A TWO-POINT LOCKING MECHANISM CONSISTING OF DEADBOLT HAVING A MINIMUM BOLT PROJECTION OF ONE AND ONE-HALF (1 1/2) INCHES, OR A HOOK SHAPED OR SIMILAR BOLT THAT ENGAGES THE STRIKE SUFFICIENTLY TO PREVENT SPREADING AND A METAL AUTOMATIC RELEASING THRESHOLD BOLT HAVING A MINIMUM EMBEDMENT OF FIVE-EIGHTHS (5/8) INCH INTO THE FLOOR. THE DEADBOLT LOCK SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) PIN TUMBLERS, AND A CYLINDER GUARD AND SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A LOCKED INDICATOR.COMPLETELY VISIBLE WHEN THE CAR DOOR(S) IS OPEN, SHALL HAVE MIRRORS SO PLACED AS TO MAKE VISIBLE THE WHOLE OF THE ELEVATOR INTERIOR TO PROSPECTIVE PASSENGERS OUTSIDE THE ELEVATOR.COMPLETELY VISIBLE WHEN THE CAR DOOR(S) IS OPEN, SHALL HAVE MIRRORS SO PLACED AS TO MAKE VISIBLE THE WHOLE OF THE

ELEVATOR INTERIOR TO PROSPECTIVE PASSENGERS OUTSIDE THE ELEVATOR.

SEC. 8-207. KEYING REQUIREMENTS. (3) IN MULTIPLE-FAMILY DWELLING COMPLEXES, ANY BUILDING (Q) WHEN ACCESS TO OR WITHIN A COMMERCIAL COMPLEX IS (Q
) WHEN ACCESS TO OR WITHIN A UPON OCCUPANCY BY THE OWNER COMMERCIAL COMPLEX IS OR PROPRIETOR, EACH SINGLE UNIT IN A TRACT OR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE SAME GENERAL PLAN, SHALL HAVE LOCKS USING COMBINATIONS WHICH INTERCHANGE FREE FROM LOCKS USED IN ALL OTHER SEPARATE DWELLINGS, PROPRIETORSHIPS OR SIMILAR DISTINCT OCCUPANCIES WITHIN SUCH TRACT OR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. EVERY APPLICANT SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY WITH WRITTEN CONFIRMATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS.

HAVING A SEPARATE IDENTIFYING FACTOR OTHER THAN THE STREET NUMBER SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED IN THE MANNER DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (K), INFRA. EACH INDIVIDUAL UNIT OF RESIDENCE SHALL HAVE A UNIT IDENTIFYING NUMBER, LETTER OR COMBINATION THEREOF DISPLAYED UPON THE DOOR.UNDULY DIFFICULT BECAUSE OF SECURED OPENINGS OR WHERE IMMEDIATE ACCESS IS NECESSARY FOR LIFE SAVING OR FIRE FIGHTING PURPOSES, A KEY OVERRIDE IS TO BE INSTALLED IN AN ACCESSIBLE LOCATION. THE KEY OVERRIDE SHALL BE MASTERED TO BOTH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND POLICE DEPARTMENT KEYS.UNDULY DIFFICULT BECAUSE OF SECURED OPENINGS OR WHERE

IMMEDIATE ACCESS IS NECESSARY FOR LIFE SAVING OR FIRE

FIGHTING PURPOSES, A KEY OVERRIDE IS TO BE INSTALLED IN AN ACCESSIBLE LOCATION. THE KEY OVERRIDE SHALL BE MASTERED TO BOTH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND POLICE DEPARTMENT KEYS.

DOOR STOPS ARE THE PROJECTIONS ALONG THE TOP AND SIDES OF A DOOR JAMB WHICH CHECK THE DOOR'S SWINGING ACTION. DOUBLE CYLINDER DEADBOLT IS A DEADBOLT WHICH CAN BE ACTIVATED ONLY BY A KEY FROM EITHER THE INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING.

4. Copyright Studio W Associates, Inc. 2022. (E) PANIC HARDWARE, WHENEVER (4) BUILDINGS SHALL BE NUMBERED REQUIRED BY THE UNIFORM WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING CODE OR TITLE 24, CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, SHALL BE EQUIPPED AND INSTALLED AS FOLLOWS: (1) LOCKING POINTS ON EACH DOOR, ONE (1) LOCATED AT THE HEADER, THE OTHER AT THE THRESHOLD OF THE DOOR; OR (2) LOCKING POINT WHICH IS NOT TO BE LOCATED AT EITHER THE TOP OR BOTTOM RAILS OF THE DOOR FRAME. THE DOOR SHALL HAVE AN ASTRAGAL CONSTRUCTED OF STEEL .125 INCH THICK WHICH SHALL BE ATTACHED WITH NONREMOVABLE BOLTS TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE DOOR. THE ASTRAGAL SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF SIX (6) INCHES VERTICALLY ABOVE AND BELOW THE LATCH OF THE PANIC HARDWARE. THE ASTROGAL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) INCHES WIDE AND EXTEND A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) INCH BEYOND THE EDGE OF THE DOOR TO WHICH IT IS ATTACHED. (R) WILL HAVE A REPEATER INSTALLED IN ITS ROOF. (S) ESTABLISHMENTS HAVING SPECIFIC TYPE INVENTORIES SHALL BE PROTECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ALARM SERVICE: (1) SILENT ALARM SYSTEM WITH A CENTRAL STATION HOOK-UP AND REQUIRED TWENTY-FOUR-HOUR SUPERVISED SERVICE:

ANY STRUCTURE FOUR (4) STORIES IN HEIGHT OR GREATER
(R) WILL HAVE A REPEATER INSTALLED IN
ITS ROOF.
(S) ESTABLISHMENTS HAVING SPECIFIC TYPE INVENTORIES SHALL BE PROTECTED BY THE FOLLOWING ALARM SERVICE:
(1) SILENT ALARM SYSTEM WITH A CENTRAL STATION HOOK-UP
AND REQUIRED TWENTY-FOUR-HOUR SUPERVISED SERVICE:

ANY STRUCTURE FOUR (4) STORIES IN HEIGHT OR GREATER ENFORCING AUTHORITY. NO . REM ARKS DA
(5) THIS SECTION SHALL NOT TE PREVENT SUPPLEMENTARY PANIC HARDWARE SHALL CONTAIN A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) DWELLING IS A BUILDING OR PORTION THEREOF DESIGNATED EXCLUSIVELY FOR RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCY, INCLUDING SINGLE- FAMILY AND MULTIPLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS. FLUSHBOLT IS A NORMAL MANUAL, KEY, TURN OPERATED OR AUTOMATIC RELEASING METAL THROWBOLT, NORMALLY USED ON INACTIVE DOOR(S) THAT IS ATTACHED TO THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE DOOR AND ENGAGES IN THE HEAD AND THRESHOLD OF THE FRAME. FULLY TEMPERED GLASS MEANS THOSE MATERIALS MEETING OR EXCEEDING ANSI STANDARD 297.1-- SAFETY GLAZING. INACTIVE LEAF OR DOOR MEANS EITHER LEAF OR DOOR OF A PAIR OF DOORS WHICH HAS NO SURFACE MOUNTED HARDWARE AND WHICH RECEIVES AND HOLDS THE LATCH OR BOLT OF THE PRIMARY LOCKING SYSTEM.

NUMBERING SUCH AS REFLECTIVE NUMBERS ON STREET CURBS OR DECORATIVE NUMBERING BUT THIS SHALL BE CONSIDERED SUPPLEMENTAL ONLY AND SHALL NOT SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION. (ORD. NO. NS-1424, § 1, 6-5-78) SEC. 8-208. GARAGE-TYPE DOORS.

ON SINGLE DOORS, PANIC (A) GARAGE-TYPE DOORS, HARDWARE MAY HAVE ONE (1) WHICH ARE EITHER ROLLING A. B. JEWELRY STORE-- MANUFACTURING, WHOLESALE OR RETAIL. ANY ESTABLISHMENT MANUFACTURING, STORING OR SELLINGA. B.

JEWELRY STORE-- MANUFACTURING, WHOLESALE OR RETAIL. ANY ESTABLISHMENT MANUFACTURING, STORING OR SELLING OVERHEAD, SOLID OVERHEAD, SWINGING, SLIDING, OR ACCORDION STYLE DOORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS:
(6) MAPS OF THE COMPLEX SHALL AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS UPON BE FURNISHED TO THE POLICE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. THE MAPS SHALL INCLUDE BUILDING IDENTIFICATION AND UNIT IDENTIFICATION.

FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION. FIREARMS AND
(1) WOOD DOORS SHALL HAVE AMMUNITION. PANELS A MINIMUM OF FIVE- C. ESTABLISHMENTS SELLING OR STORING WHOLESALE LIQUOR, C. ESTABLISHMENTS SELLING OR SIXTEENTHS (5/16) INCH IN STORING WHOLESALE LIQUOR, THICKNESS WITH THE LOCKING HARDWARE BEING ATTACHED TO THE SUPPORT FRAMING.

TOBACCO OR DRUGS. TOBACCO
(1) ALL EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE OR DRUGS. EQUIPPED WITH A LIGHTING D. E. F.

FACILITIES SELLING OR STORING FURS. PRECIOUS METAL STORAGE FACILITIES. BANKS, SAVINGS AND LOAN INSTITUTIONS AND CREDIT D. E. F.

FACILITIES SELLING OR STORING FURS. PRECIOUS METAL STORAGE FACILITIES. BANKS, SAVINGS AND LOAN

INSTITUTIONS AND CREDIT
(2) ALUMINUM DOORS SHALL BE A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF .0215 DEVICE WHICH SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM MAINTAINED ONE (1) FOOTCANDLE OF LIGHT AT GROUND LEVEL DURING HOURS OF DARKNESS. LIGHTING DEVICES SHALL BE PROTECTED BY VANDAL RESISTANT COVERS.

INCHES AND RIVETED TOGETHER A MINIMUM OF EIGHTEEN (18) INCHES ON CENTER ALONG THE OUTSIDE SEAMS. THERE SHALL BE A FULL WIDTH HORIZONTAL BEAM ATTACHED TO THE MAIN DOOR STRUCTURE WHICH SHALL MEET THE PILOT, OR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS, DOOR FRAMING WITHIN THREE (3) INCHES OF THE STRIKE AREA OF THE PILOT OR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS DOOR.

DA
TE UNIO NS. UNIO
(3) DOUBLE DOORS CONTAINING NS. PANIC HARDWARE SHALL HAVE A (1) SILENT ALARM SYSTEM NOT REQUIRING A CENTRAL STATION(1) SILENT ALARM SYSTEM NOT REQUIRING A CENTRAL STATION

DSA PLAN CHECK
(M) AISLES, PASSAGEWAYS AND RECESSES RELATED TO AND FULL LENGTH ASTRAGAL CONSTRUCTED OF STEEL, ATTACHED TOTHE DOORS AT THEIR MEETING POINT WHICH WILL CLOSE THE OPENING BETWEEN THEM, BUT NOT INTERFERE WITH THE OPERATION OF EITHER DOOR. (F) FOR EXTERIOR SWINGING DOORS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: (1) DOOR JAMBS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH SOLID BACKING IN SUCH A MANNER THAT NO VOIDS EXIST BETWEEN THE STRIKE SIDE OF THE JAMB AND THE FRAME OPENING FOR A VERTICAL DISTANCE OF SIX (6) INCHES EACH SIDE OF THE STRIKE. FINGER JOINTS ARE PROHIBITED.

HOOKUP OR SUPERVISED SERVICE:HOOKUP OR SUPERVISED SERVICE:

JAMB IS THE VERTICAL MEMBERS OF A DOOR FRAME TO WHICH THE DOOR IS SECURED.

WITHIN MULTIPLE-FAMILY DWELLING COMPLEXES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH LIGHTING DEVICES WHICH SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM MAINTAINED ONE (1) FOOTCANDLE OF LIGHT AT GROUND LEVEL DURING HOURS OF DARKNESS. LIGHTING DEVICES SHALL BE PROTECTED BY VANDAL RESISTANT COVERS.

A. B. C.

LIQUOR STORES. PAWNSHOPS. ESTABLISHMENTS MANUFACTURING, STORING OR SELLING A. B. C.

LIQUOR STORES. PAWNSHOPS. ESTABLISHMENTS MANUFACTURING, STORING OR SELLING

DSA BACK CHECK

BIDDING
JAMB/STRIKE MEANS THAT COMPONENT OF A DOOR ASSEMBLY WHICH RECEIVES AND HOLDS SECURE THE EXTENDED LOCK BOLT; THE STRIKE AND JAMB USED TOGETHER ARE CONSIDERED A UNIT. JAMB/WALL IS THAT COMPONENT OF A DOOR ASSEMBLY TO WHICH A DOOR IS ATTACHED AND SECURED; THE WALL AND JAMB USED TOGETHER ARE CONSIDERED A UNIT. (3) FIBERGLASS DOORS SHALL (6) OUNCES PER SQUARE FOOT HAVE PANELS A MINIMUM OF SIX FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE DOOR TO A HEIGHT OF SEVEN (7) FEET. PANELS ABOVE SEVEN (7) FEET AND PANELS IN RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES HAVE A DENSITY OF NOT LESS THAN FIVE (5) OUNCES PER SQUARE FOOT.

INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF FRAMES AND JAMBSELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT. ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT. CONSTR D. UCTION E. ESTABLISHMENTS DEALING IN COINS AND STAMPS. ESTABLISHMENTS MANUFACTURING, STORING OR SELLING D. E. ESTABLISHMENTS DEALING IN COINS AND STAMPS. ESTABLISHMENTS MANUFACTURING, STORING OR SELLING (N) ALL PARKING LOTS, CARPORTS, GARAGES AND PARKING STRUCTURES OF MULTIPLE-FAMILY DWELLING COMPLEXES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH LIGHTING DEVICES WHICH WILL PROVIDE A MINIMUM MAINTAINED ONE (1) FOOTCANDLE OF LIGHT ON THE PARKING SURFACE DURING HOURS OF DARKNESS. SUBTERRANEAN PARKING LOTS SHALL MAINTAIN LIGHTING TWENTY-FOUR (24) HOURS A DAY. LIGHTING DEVICES SHALL BE PROTECTED BY VANDAL RESISTANT COVERS.

INDUSTRIAL TOOL SUPPLIES.INDUSTRIAL
(B) WHERE SLIDING OR ACCORDION TOOL SUPPLIES. DOORS ARE UTILIZED, THEY F. ESTABLISHMENTS MANUFACTURING, STORING OR SELLING F. ESTABLISHMENTS MANUFACTURING, STORING OR SELLING
KEY PLAN KEY-IN-KNOB IS A LOCKSET HAVING THE KEY CYLINDER AND OTHER LOCK MECHANISMS CONTAINED IN THE KNOB.

SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH GUIDE TRACKS WHICH SHALL BE DESIGNED SO THAT THE DOOR CANNOT BE REMOVED FROM THE TRACK WHEN IN THE CLOSED AND LOCKED POSITION.CAME RAS. CAME (1) RAS. A. LOCAL OR AUDIBLE ALARM SYSTEM: ANTIQUE DEALERS.(1) A.

LOCAL OR AUDIBLE ALARM SYSTEM: ANTIQUE DEALERS.

LATCH OR LATCH BOLT IS A BEVELED, SPRING-ACTUATED BOLT, WHICH MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE A DEADLOCKING DEVICE. LOCK OR LOCKSET IS A KEYED DEVICE (COMPLETE WITH CYLINDER, LATCH OR DEADBOLT MECHANISM, AND TRIM SUCH AS KNOBS, LEVERS, THUMB TURNS, ESCUTCHEONS, ETC.) FOR SECURING ADOOR IN A CLOSED POSITION AGAINST FORCED ENTRY. LOCKED INDICATOR IS A DEVICE INDICATING WHETHER THE LOCK SET (DEADBOLT, ETC.) IS LOCKED OR OPEN. (2) IN WOOD FRAMING, HORIZONTAL (C BLOCKING SHALL BE PLACED ) DOORS THAT EXCEED SIXTEEN (16) FEET IN WIDTH SHALL BETWEEN STUDS AT DOOR LOCK HEIGHT FOR THREE (3) STUD SPACES EACH SIDE OF THE DOOR OPENINGS. TRIMMERS SHALL BE FULL LENGTH FROM THE HEADS TO THE FLOOR WITH SOLID BACKING AGAINST SOLE PLATES.

B. ART GALLERIE S.B. ART GALLERIE
S. HAVE TWO (2) LOCK RECEIVING POINTS, ONE (1) LOCATED ON EACH SIDE OF THE DOOR. DOORS NOT EXCEEDING SIXTEEN (16) FEET SHALL HAVE ONE (1) LOCK RECEIVING POINT PLACED ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DOOR. A SINGLE BOLT MAY BE USED IN THE CENTER OF THE DOOR WITH THE LOCKING POINT LOCATED EITHER IN THE FLOOR OR DOOR FRAME HEADER.

C. D. (1)
SERVICE STATIONS. FOOD MARKETS. NOTHING IN THIS SUBSECTION SHALL PRECLUDE THE USE OF C. D.
(1)
SERVICE STATIONS. FOOD MARKETS. NOTHING IN THIS SUBSECTION SHALL PRECLUDE THE USE OF (O) ALL EXTERIOR REQUIRED PLACED AT A HEIGHT WHICH WILL LIGHTING DEVICES SHALL BE FULLY ILLUMINATE AN AVERAGE ADULT. (G)

IN MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY OFFICE BUILDINGS ALL ENTRANCE
AN ALARM SYSTEM PROVIDING A HIGHER LEVEL OF SECURITY THAN THAT WHICH IS REQUIRED. (ORD. NO. NS-1424, § 1, 6-5-78; ORD. NO. NS-1502, § 1, 10-1-79; ORD. NO. NS-1794, § 7, 10-14-85)AN ALARM SYSTEM PROVIDING A HIGHER LEVEL OF SECURITY THAN THAT WHICH IS REQUIRED.
(ORD. NO. NS-1424, § 1, 6-5-78; ORD. NO. NS-1502, § 1, 10-1-79; ORD. NO. NS-1794, § 7, 10-14-85) (P) IN MULTIPLE-FAMILY DWELLING COMPLEXES WHERE A
DOORS TO INDIVIDUAL OFFICE SUITES SHALL MEET THE CONSTRUCTION AND LOCKING REQUIREMENTS FOR EXTERIOR DOORS.

COMMON LAUNDRY IS SUPPLIED, THE LAUNDRY ROOM'S ACCESS DOOR SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A WINDOW, SELF CLOSURE DEVICE AND SELF LOCKING DOOR LOCK WHICH CAN BE MANUALLY DISENGAGED ON THE INTERIOR. LIGHTING SHALL BE MAINTAINED INSIDE THE LAUNDRY ROOM DURING HOURS OF DARKNESS.

LOCKING DEVICE IS A PART OF A WINDOW OR SLIDING DOOR ASSEMBLY WHICH IS INTENDED TO PREVENT MOVEMENT OF THE MOVABLE SASH OR DOOR. (D) ALL OVERHEAD OR SWINGING WITH SLIDEBOLTS WHICH SHALL BE DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED CAPABLE OF UTILIZING PADLOCKS WITH A MINIMUM NINE-THIRTY- SECONDS (9/32) INCH SHACKLE. (H)
IN MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY BUILDINGS, INTERIOR WALLS SEC. 8- 212. TESTS. SEC. 8- DIVIDING THE INDIVIDUAL SUITES 212. TESTS. SHALL NOT END AT THE FALSE CEILING BUT SHALL CONTINUE TO THE REAL ROOF. (I) ACCESSIBLE IF LESS THAN TWELVE (12) FEET ABOVE GROUND OR ADJACENT TO ANY PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY. ACCESSIBLE WINDOWS AND TRANSOMS HAVING A PANE OR OPENING EXCEEDING NINETY-SIX (96) SQUARE INCHES, WITH THE SMALLEST DIMENSION EXCEEDING SIX (6) INCHES, AND NOT VISIBLE FROM A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE (A) (1) TESTS, GENERAL. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER, OR HIS(A) (1)
TESTS, GENERAL.

IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER, OR HIS
MINIMUM MAINTAINED MEANS MEASURABLE LIGHT LEVEL AT FURTHEST POINT FROM LIGHTING SOURCE AT GROUND LEVEL. MULTIPLE-FAMILY DWELLING IS A BUILDING OR PORTION THEREOF DESIGNED FOR OCCUPANCY BY ONE (1) OR MORE PERSONS LIVING INDEPENDENTLY OF EACH OTHER, INCLUDING HOTELS, MOTELS, APARTMENTS, DUPLEXES, TOWN HOUSES, AND CONDOMINIUMS. PANIC HARDWARE IS A LATCHING DEVICE ON A DOOR ASSEMBLY FOR USE WHEN EMERGENCY EGRESS IS REQUIRED DUE TO A FIRE OR OTHER THREAT TO LIFE SAFETY. SUCH DEVICES ARE DESIGNED SO THAT THEY WILL FACILITATE THE SAFE EGRESS OF PEOPLE IN CASE OF AN EMERGENCY WHEN A PRESSURE NOT TO EXCEED FIFTEEN (15) POUNDS IS APPLIED TO THE RELEASING DEVICE IN THE DIRECTION OF EXIT TRAVEL. SUCH RELEASING DEVICES ARE BARS OR PANELS EXTENDING NOT LESS THAN TWO- THIRDS (2/3) OF THE WIDTH OF THE DOOR AND PLACED AT HEIGHTS SUITABLE FOR THE SERVICE REQUIRED, NOT LESS THAN THIRTY (30) NOR MORE THAN FORTY- FOUR (44) INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR. (1) THE ENTIRE SLIDEBOLT ASSEMBLY SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF CASE-HARDENED STEEL AND SHALL HAVE A FRAME A MINIMUM OF .120 INCHES IN THICKNESS, AND A BOLT DIAMETER A MINIMUM OF ONE-HALF (1/2) INCH, AND SHALL PROTRUDE AT LEAST ONE AND ONE- HALF (1 1/2) INCHES INTO THE RECEIVING GUIDE. (Q) WHEN ACCESS TO OR WITHIN A MULTIPLE-FAMILY DWELLING EXTERIOR TRANSOMS OR WINDOWS SHALL BE DEEMED DESIGNATED AGENT, OF A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE FALLING WITHIN THE PROVISIONS OF THIS DIVISION TO PROVIDE THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY WITH A WRITTEN SPECIFICATION PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT INDICATING THAT THE MATERIALS UTILIZED MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS.

DESIGNATED AGENT, OF A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE FALLING WITHIN

THE PROVISIONS OF THIS DIVISION TO PROVIDE THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY WITH A WRITTEN SPECIFICATION PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT INDICATING THAT THE MATERIALS UTILIZED MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS.

COMPLEX OR PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY IS UNDULY DIFFICULT BECAUSE OF SECURED OPENINGS OR WHERE IMMEDIATE ACCESS IS NECESSARY FOR LIFESAVING OR FIRE FIGHTING PURPOSES, A KEY OVERRIDE IS TO BE INSTALLED IN AN ACCESSIBLE LOCATION. THE KEY OVERRIDE SHALL BE MASTERED TO BOTH FIRE DEPARTMENT AND POLICE DEPARTMENT KEYS. (2) SLIDE BOLT ASSEMBLIES SHALL WITH BOLTS WHICH ARE BE ATTACHED TO THE DOOR NONREMOVABLE FROM THE EXTERIOR. RIVETS SHALL NOT BE USED TO ATTACH SUCH ASSEMBLIES. (2) WHENEVER THERE IS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE OF(2) WHENEVER THERE IS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE OF THOROUGHFARE SHALL BE PROTECTED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER:

COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS DIVISION OR EVIDENCE THAT ANY MATERIAL OR ANY CONSTRUCTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS DIVISION, OR IN ORDER TO SUBSTANTIATE CLAIMS FOR ALTERNATE MATERIALS OR METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION, THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY MAY REQUIRE TESTS AS PROOF OF COMPLIANCE TO BE MADE AT THE EXPENSE OF THE OWNER OR HIS AGENT BY ANY AGENCY WHICH IS APPROVED BY THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY.COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS DIVISION OR EVIDENCE

THAT ANY MATERIAL OR ANY CONSTRUCTION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS DIVISION, OR IN ORDER TO

SUBSTANTIATE CLAIMS FOR ALTERNATE MATERIALS OR METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION, THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY MAY REQUIRE TESTS

AS PROOF OF COMPLIANCE TO BE MADE AT THE EXPENSE OF THE OWNER OR HIS AGENT BY ANY AGENCY WHICH IS APPROVED BY THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY.

VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL
(E) PADLOCKS USED WITH EXTERIOR MOUNTED SLIDE BOLTS(R) ALL SKYLIGHTS ON THE ROOF OF ANY RESIDENTIAL (1) O R
(2)
FULLY TEMPERED GLASS OR SHALL HAVE A HARDENED STEEL BURGLARY RESISTANT GLAZING; SHACKLE A MINIMUM OF NINE- THIRTY-SECONDS (9/32) INCH IN DIAMETER WITH HEEL AND TOE LOCKING AND A MINIMUM FIVE (5) PIN TUMBLER OPERATION. THE KEY SHALL BE NONREMOVABLE WHEN IN AN UNLOCKED POSITION.

STRUCTURE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH RATED BURGLARY RESISTANT GLAZING. THE FOLLOWING WINDOW BARRIERS MAY BE USED BUT SHALL ACAD EMY 2609 W 5TH STREET
SANTA ANA, CA 92703
(S) PASSENGER ELEVATORS, THE INTERIORS OF WHICH ARE NOT BE SECURED WITH BOLTS, WHICH ARE NONREMOVABLE FROM THE EXTERIOR: A. ONE-HALF (1/2) INCH ROUND OR ONE BY ONE-QUARTER (1 X 1/4) INCH FLAT METAL SPACED NOT MORE THAN FIVE (5) INCHES APART AND SECURELY FASTENED; OR COMPLETELY VISIBLE WHEN CAR DOOR(S) IS OPEN, SHALL HAVE MIRRORS SO PLACED AS TO MAKE VISIBLE THE WHOLE OF THE ELEVATOR INTERIOR TO PROSPECTIVE PASSENGERS OUTSIDE THE ELEVATOR. (F) DOORS UTILIZING A CYLINDER LOCK SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR STEEL FIVE (5) PIN TUMBLER OPERATION OR IRON BARS OF AT LEAST WITH THE BOLT OR LOCKING BAR EXTENDING INTO THE RECEIVING GUIDE A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) INCH. (3) SPECIMENS SHALL BE REPRESENTATIVE, AND THE(3) SPECIMENS SHALL BE REPRESENTATIVE, AND THE (G) PEDESTRIAN ACCESS DOORS CONTAINED IN GARAGE TYPE (T) WHENEVER A MAIL SLOT IS LOCATED WITHIN FORTY (40) CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE VERIFIED BY ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS AND BILL OF MATERIALS. TWO (2) COMPLETE SETS OF MANUFACTURER ORFABRICATOR INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND FULL-SIZE OR ACCURATE SCALE TEMPLATES FOR ALL ITEMS AND HARDWARE SHALL BE INCLUDED.

CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE VERIFIED BY ASSEMBLY DRAWINGS AND BILL OF MATERIALS. TWO (2) COMPLETE SETS OF MANUFACTURER OR

FABRICATOR INSTALLATION

INSTRUCTIONS AND FULL-SIZE OR
ACCURATE SCALE TEMPLATES FOR ALL ITEMS AND HARDWARE SHALL BE INCLUDED.

PART, AS DISTINGUISHED FROM COMPONENT, IS A UNIT (OR SUBASSEMBLY) WHICH COMBINES WITH OTHER UNITS TO MAKE UP A COMPONENT. PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE IS THE SINGLE LOCKING SYSTEM ON A DOOR OR WINDOW UNIT WHOSE FUNCTION IS TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED INTRUSION.

DOORS SHALL COMPLY TO THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN SECTION 8-211 (B) OR (E). (ORD. NO. NS-1424, § 1, 6-5-78; ORD. NO. NS-1794, § 5, 10-14-85) SEC. 8-209. WINDOWS AND SLIDING GLASS DOORS. THE FOLLOWING REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET FOR WINDOWS AND SLIDING GLASS DOORS:

INCHES OF THE PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE ON ANY EXTERIOR DOOR, IT SHALL BE COVERED BY AN INTERIOR HOOD WHICH WILL DISCOURAGE MANIPULATION OF THE PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE.

B. INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR IRON OR ONE-EIGHTH (1/8) INCH METAL WITH STEEL GRILLS OF AT LEAST NOT MORE THAN A TWO (2) INCH MESH AND SECURELY FASTENED. (1) WITH THE OPERATION OF OPENING WINDOWS IF SUCH WINDOWS ARE REQUIRED TO BE OPENABLE BY THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. (J) (1) USED FOR BUSINESS PURPOSES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH: A. B. ROUND OR ONE BY ONE-FOURTH (1 X 1/4) INCH FLAT METAL SPACED NOT MORE THAN FIVE (5) INCHES ON CENTER TO CROSS THE NARROWEST DIMENSION OF THE OPENING BEING COVERED. IF THE NARROWEST DIMENSION OF THAT OPENING EXCEEDS EIGHTEEN (18) INCHES, CROSS MEMBERS SHALL BE WELDED INTO PLACE, NOT MORE THAN EIGHTEEN (18) INCHES APART BEGINNING WITH A CROSS MEMBER AT THE CENTER OF THE OPENING. CROSS MEMBERS SHALL BE WELDED TO EACH AND EVERY BAR IT CROSSES. THE ENTIRE BAR ASSEMBLY SHALL BE MOUNTED INSIDE THE SKYLIGHT AND SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING STRUCTURE BY MEANS OF MACHINE BOLTS SPACED NOT MORE THAN SIXTEEN (16) INCHES APART OR ATTACHED BY MEANS OF AN EQUIVALENT METHOD APPROVED BY THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY; OR (U) ALL EXTERIOR BLOCK WALL FENCING OF MULTIPLE-FAMILY THE PROTECTIVE BARS OR GRILLS SHALL NOT INTERFERE CONDITION

AL USE PERMIT
DWELLING COMPLEXES SHALL HAVE INTERVALS PROVIDING VISIBILITY CORRIDORS, WHICH WILL ALLOW VISIBILITY OF THE INTERIOR FROM OUTSIDE THE WALL, AND THESE VISIBILITY CORRIDORS SHALL BE PLACED AT REGULAR INTERVALS. THESE WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE SIDE FACING THE STREET ONLY. (B) SLIDING GLASS DOOR TESTS/PROCEDURES.(B) SLIDING GLASS DOOR (1) THE CONSTRUCTION AND TESTS/PROCEDURES. SIZE OF THE TEST DOOR(1) THE CONSTRUCTION AND SIZE OF THE TEST DOOR PRIVATE DWELLING OR SINGLE- FAMILY DWELLING IS A BUILDING DESIGNED EXCLUSIVELY FOR OCCUPANCY BY ONE (1) FAMILY. RAIL IS THE HORIZONTAL MEMBERS OF A SASH FRAME. A MEETING RAIL IS ONE WHICH MATES WITH A RAIL OF ANOTHER SASH OR FRAMING MEMBER OF THE WINDOW FRAME WHEN THE SASH IS IN THE CLOSED POSITION. SASH IS AN ASSEMBLY OF STILES, RAILS, AND, SOMETIMES, MUNTINS ASSEMBLED INTO A SINGLE FRAME WHICH SUPPORTS THE GLAZING MATERIAL. A FIXED SASH IS ONE WHICH IS NOT INTENDED TO BE OPENED. A MOVABLE SASH IS INTENDED TO BE OPENED. SILL IS THE LOWEST HORIZONTAL MEMBER OF A WINDOW FRAME. SINGLE CYLINDER DEADBOLT IS A DEADBOLT LOCK WHICH IS ACTIVATED FROM THE EXTERIOR BY A KEY AND FROM THE INTERIOR BY A KNOW, THUMB-TURN, LEVER OR SIMILAR MECHANISM. SOLID CORE DOOR MEANS A DOOR COMPOSED OF SOLID WOOD OR COMPRESSED WOOD EQUAL IN STRENGTH TO SOLID WOOD CONSTRUCTION. STILE IS A VERTICAL FRAMING MEMBER OF A WINDOW OR DOOR. A MEETING STILE IS ONE WHICH MATES WITH A STILE OF ANOTHER SASH, OR A VERTICAL FRAMING MEMBER OF A DOOR OR WINDOW FRAME WHEN THE SASH IS IN THE CLOSED POSITION. STRIKE IS A METAL PLATE ATTACHED TO OR MORTISED INTO A DOOR JAMB TO RECEIVE AND TO HOLD A PROJECTED LATCH BOLT AND/OR DEADBOLT IN ORDER TO SECURE THE DOOR TO THE JAMB. SWINGING DOOR MEANS A DOOR HINGED AT THE STILE OR AT THE HEAD AND THRESHOLD. (A) EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN SECTION 8-210 (SPECIAL ROOF OPENINGS SHALL BE EQUIPPED AS FOLLOWS: ALL SKYLIGHTS ON THE ROOF OF ANY BUILDING OR PREMISES ASSEMBLIES, JAMBS AND HEADERS, AND ALL HARDWARE COMPONENTS SHALL BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THAT FOR WHICH ACCEPTANCE IS DESIRED. THE DOOR ASSEMBLY AND MOUNTING IN THE SUPPORT FIXTURE SHALL SIMULATE THE RIGIDITY NORMALLY PROVIDED TO A DOOR ASSEMBLY IN A BUILDING BY THE CEILING, FLOOR AND WALLS.ASSEMBLIES, JAMBS AND HEADERS, AND ALL HARDWARE COMPONENTS SHALL BE REPRESENTATIVE OF THAT FOR WHICH ACCEPTANCE IS DESIRED. THE DOOR ASSEMBLY AND MOUNTING IN

THE SUPPORT FIXTURE SHALL SIMULATE THE RIGIDITY NORMALLY PROVIDED TO A DOOR ASSEMBLY IN A BUILDING BY THE CEILING, FLOOR AND WALLS.

RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PROVISIONS) AND SECTION 8-211 (SPECIAL COMMERCIAL BUILDING PROVISIONS), ALL OPENABLE EXTERIOR WINDOWS AND SLIDING GLASS DOORS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE TESTS AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 8- 212 (TESTS).

VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL
(V) PERMANENTLY AFFIXED LADDERS LEADING TO ROOFS SHALL
RATED BURGLARY RESISTANT GLAZING; OR IRON OR STEEL BARS OF AT LEAST ONE-HALF (1/2) INCH BE FULLY ENCLOSED WITH SHEET METAL TO A HEIGHT OF TEN (10) FEET. THIS COVERING SHALL BE LOCKED AGAINST THE LADDER WITH A CASE HARDENED HASP, SECURED WITH NONREMOVABLE SCREWS OR BOLTS AND A PADLOCK WITH A MINIMUM THREE-EIGHTHS (3/8) INCH HARDENED STEEL SHACKLE, LOCKING AT BOTH HEEL AND TOE, AND A MINIMUM FIVE (5) PIN TUMBLER OPERATION WITH NONREMOVABLE KEY WHEN IN AN UNLOCKED POSITION. HINGES ON THE COVER WILL BE PROVIDED WITH NONREMOVABLE PINS WHEN USING PIN TYPE HINGES. (B) LOUVERED WINDOWS SHALL PORTION OF THE WINDOW IS NOT BE USED WHEN ANY LESS THAN TWELVE (12) FEET (2) SAMPLE DOORS SUBMITTED FOR TESTING SHALL BE GLAZED. (2) SAMPLE DOORS SUBMITTED FOR TESTING SHALL BE GLAZED. PHASE IV 601 N FAIRVIEW, SANTA ANA, CA
92703
VERTICALLY OR SIX (6) FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM AN ACCESSIBLE SURFACE OR ANY ADJOINING ROOF, BALCONY, LANDING, STAIR TREAD, PLATFORM OR SIMILAR STRUCTURE.

PANELS SHALL BE CLOSED AND LOCKED WITH THE PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE ONLY.PANELS SHALL BE CLOSED AND LOCKED WITH THE PRIMARY LOCKING (3) TESTS SHALL BE PERFORMED DEVICE ONLY. ON THE SAMPLES IN THE(3) TESTS SHALL BE PERFORMED (ORD. NO. NS- ON THE SAMPLES IN THE
1424, § 1, 6-5-78) FOLLOWIN G ORDER: FOLLOWIN
SEC. 8-210. SPECIAL G ORDER: RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PROVISIONS. THE FOLLOWING SPECIAL PROVISIONS SHALL APPLY TO ALL RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS. (A) WITH THE PANELS IN THE TEST POSITION, A CONCENTRATED(A) WITH THE PANELS IN THE TEST LOAD OF EIGHT HUNDRED (800) POSITION, A CONCENTRATED POUNDS SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE VERTICAL PULL STILE INCORPORATING A LOCKING DEVICE, AT A POINT ON THE STILE WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF THE LOCKING DEVICE, IN THE DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS THAT WOULD TEND TO OPEN THE DOOR. WITH THE LOAD REMOVED, DETERMINE IF THE PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE CAN BE UNLOCKED BY MANIPULATION AS DESCRIBED IN TEST (1), INFRA.

LOAD OF EIGHT HUNDRED (800) POUNDS SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE

VERTICAL PULL STILE
INCORPORATING A LOCKING DEVICE, AT A POINT ON THE STILE WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF THE LOCKING DEVICE, IN THE DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS THAT WOULD TEND TO OPEN THE DOOR. WITH THE LOAD REMOVED, DETERMINE IF

THE PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE CAN BE UNLOCKED BY MANIPULATION AS DESCRIBED IN TEST (1), INFRA.
(ORD. NO. NS-1424, § 1, 6-5-78; ORD. NO. NS-1436, § 2, 8-21-78; ORD. NO. NS-1794, § 6, 10-14-85) SEC. 8-211. SPECIAL COMMERCIAL BUILDING PROVISIONS. (A) ALL EXTERIOR SWINGING DOORS SHALL BE OF SOLID CORE CONSTRUCTION WITH A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF ONE AND THREE- FOURTHS (1 3/4) INCHES, OR WITH PANELS NOT LESS THAN NINE- SIXTEENTHS (9/16) INCH THICK. (A) SWINGING EXTERIOR GLASS WITH GLASS PANELS, SOLID WOOD DOORS, WOOD OR METAL DOORS OR METAL DOORS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OR PROTECTED AS FOLLOWS: (ELECTRONIC SLIDING DOORS ARE PROHIBITED)

POLICE DEPARTM ENTNOTES
(B) ANY SWINGING DOOR LEADING FROM A GARAGE INTO AC. A STEEL OR IRON GRILL OF AT RESIDENCE SHALL BE OF SOLID LEAST ONE-EIGHTH (1/8) INCH CORE CONSTRUCTION WITH A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF ONE AND THREE-EIGHTHS (1 3/8) INCHES.

METAL WITH A MAXIMUM TWO (2) INCH MESH MOUNTED INSIDE THE SKYLIGHT AND SECURED BY BOLTS WHICH ARE NONREMOVABLE FROM THE EXTERIOR. (B) WITH PANELS IN THE TEST POSITION, A CONCENTRATED LOAD(B) WITH PANELS IN THE TEST POSITION, A CONCENTRATED LOAD (1) WOOD DOORS SHALL BE OF SOLID CORE CONSTRUCTION OF FIFTY (50) POUNDS SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE VERTICAL PULL STILE INCORPORATING A LOCKING DEVICE, AT A POINT ON THE STILE WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF THE LOCKING DEVICE, IN THE DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS THAT WOULD TEND TO OPEN THE DOOR WHILE, SIMULTANEOUSLY, AN ADDITIONAL CONCENTRATED LOAD OF TWO HUNDRED (200) POUNDS IS APPLIED TO THE SAME AREA OF THE SAME STILE IN A DIRECTION PERPENDICULAR TO THE PLANE OF GLASS TOWARD THE INTERIOR SIDE OF THE BUILDING. WITH THE LOAD APPLIED, DETERMINE IF THE PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE CAN BE UNLOCKED BY MANIPULATION AS DIRECTED IN TEST (1), INFRA.

OF FIFTY (50) POUNDS SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE VERTICAL PULL STILE INCORPORATING A LOCKING DEVICE, AT A POINT ON THE STILE WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF THE LOCKING DEVICE, IN THE DIRECTION

PARALLEL TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS THAT WOULD TEND TO OPEN

THE DOOR WHILE, SIMULTANEOUSLY, AN ADDITIONAL CONCENTRATED LOAD OF TWO HUNDRED (200) POUNDS IS APPLIED TO THE SAME AREA OF THE SAME STILE IN A DIRECTION PERPENDICULAR TO THE PLANE OF GLASS TOWARD THE INTERIOR SIDE OF THE BUILDING. WITH THE LOAD APPLIED, DETERMINE IF THE PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE CAN BE UNLOCKED BY MANIPULATION AS DIRECTED IN TEST (1), INFRA. (C)
THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A WITH A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF ONE AND THREE-FOURTHS (1 3/4) INCHES. HOLLOW METAL DOORS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF A MINIMUM EQUIVALENT TO SIXTEEN (16) U.S. GAUGE STEEL AND HAVE SUFFICIENT REINFORCEMENT TO MAINTAIN THE DESIGNED THICKNESS OF THE DOOR WHEN ANY LOCKING DEVICE IS INSTALLED; SUCH REINFORCEMENT BEING ABLE TO RESTRICT COLLAPSING OF THE DOOR AROUND THE LOCKING DEVICE.

SINGLE CYLINDER DEADBOLT HAVING A MINIMUM PROJECTION OF ONE (1) INCH AND AN EMBEDMENT OF AT LEAST THREE-FOURTHS (3/4) INCH INTO THE STRIKE RECEIVING THE BOLT. THE BOLT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED SO AS TO RESIST CUTTING TOOL ATTACKS. THE CYLINDER SHALL HAVE A CYLINDER GUARD, A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) PIN TUMBLERS, AND SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE INNER PORTION OF THE LOCK BY CONNECTING SCREWS OF AT LEAST ONE-FOURTH (1/4) INCH DIAMETER.

D. THESE REQUIREMENTS DO NOT WITH A HEIGHT OF THIRTY-FIVE (35) APPLY ON ANY STRUCTURE FEET OR MORE WHERE THERE IS NO READILY AVAILABLE ROOF ACCESS AS DETERMINED BY THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY.

U.L LISTED MEANS TESTED AND LISTED BY UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, INC. VANDAL RESISTANT COVER IS A PROTECTIVE COVER CONSTRUCTED OF EITHER ACRYLIC, POLYCARBONATE OR WIRE MESH WHICH TOTALLY ENCLOSES THE LIGHT SOURCE. THE WIRE MESH MUST HAVE (1) ALL HATCHWAY OPENINGS ON PREMISES USED FOR BUSINESS THE ROOF OR ANY BUILDING OR PURPOSES SHALL BE SECURED AS FOLLOWS: A. COVERED ON THE INSIDE WITH AT LEAST SIXTEEN (16) U.S. GAUGE SHEET STEEL, OR ITS EQUIVALENT, ATTACHED WITH SCREWS.

Dat
e Project Number (2) EXCEPT WHEN DOUBLE CYLINDER DEADBOLTS ARE UTILIZED OR SAFETY GLAZING IS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 54 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, ANY GLAZING INSTALLED WITHIN FORTY (40) INCHES OF ANY DOOR LOCKING MECHANISM SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OR PROTECTED AS FOLLOWS:

IF THE HATCHWAY IS OF WOODEN MATERIAL, IT SHALL BE
190/01/ 2023220
37 THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SUBSECTION DO NOT APPLY WHERE PANIC HARDWARE IS REQUIRED OR AN EQUIVALENT DEVICE IS APPROVED (C) REPEAT TEST (B) SUBSTITUTING EIGHT HUNDRED (800)(C
) REPEAT TEST (B) SUBSTITUTING EIGHT HUNDRED (800) POUNDS FOR THE INDICATED FIFTY (50) POUNDS. PERFORM THE MANIPULATION TESTS WITH THE LOAD REMOVED.

POUNDS FOR THE INDICATED FIFTY (50) POUNDS. PERFORM THE MANIPULATION TESTS WITH THE LOAD REMOVED.

Application Number Drawing Number B. THE HATCHWAY SHALL BE SECURED FROM THE INSIDE WITH A XX- XXXX XX
A

0. 7
A. FULLY TEMPERED GLASS OR RATED BURGLARY RESISTANT SLIDE BAR OR SLIDE BOLTS GLAZIN WHICH ARE ATTACHED BY G; OR Dra wn
Chec
Aut ked
hor Chec ker
City Council 26 – 42 1/16/2024
POLICE DEPARTMENT NOTES (CONT.) : (D) WITH THE PANELS IN THE TEST POSITION, A CONCENTRATED (C) WITH THE SLIDING SASH IN LOAD OF FIFTY (50) POUNDS SHALL THE NORMAL POSITION, A BE APPLIED TO THE VERTICAL PULL STILE INCORPORATING A LOCKING DEVICE, AT A POINT ON THE STILE WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF THE LOCKING DEVICE, IN THE DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS THAT WOULD TEND TO OPEN THE DOOR WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY, AN ADDITIONAL CONCENTRATED LOAD OF TWO HUNDRED (200) POUNDS IS APPLIED TO THE SAME STILE IN THE DIRECTION PERPENDICULAR TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS TOWARD THE EXTERIOR SIDE OF THE DOOR. WITH THE LOAD APPLIED, DETERMINE IF THE PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE CAN BE UNLOCKED BY MANIPULATION AS DESCRIBED IN TEST (1), INFRA.

CONCENTRATED LOAD OF TWO HUNDRED (200) POUNDS SHALL BE APPLIED SEPARATELY TO EACH SASH MEMBER INCORPORATING A LOCKING DEVICE, AT A POINT ON THE SASH MEMBER WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF THE LOCKING DEVICE, IN THE DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS THAT WOULD TEND TO OPEN THE WINDOW WHILE, SIMULTANEOUSLY, AN ADDITIONAL CONCENTRATED LOAD OF SEVENTY-FIVE (75) POUNDS IS APPLIED TO THE SAME AREA OF THE SAME SASH MEMBER IN THE DIRECTION PERPENDICULAR TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS TOWARD THE EXTERIOR SIDE OF THE WINDOW. WITH THE LOAD REMOVED, APPLY THE MANIPULATION TEST DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (B)(3)(1), SUPRA. (E) REPEAT TEST (D) SUBSTITUTING EIGHT HUNDRED (800)(D) WITH THE SLIDING SASH LIFTED POUNDS FOR THE INDICATED UPWARD TO THE FULL LIMIT FIFTY (50) POUNDS. PERFORM THE MANIPULATION TESTS WITH THE LOAD REMOVED.

WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE WINDOW FRAME, A CONCENTRATED LOAD OF TWO HUNDRED (200) POUNDS SHALL BE APPLIED SEPARATELY TO EACH SASH MEMBER INCORPORATING A LOCKING DEVICE, AT A POINT ON THE SASH WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF THE LOCKING DEVICE, IN THE DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE PLANE OF GLASS THAT WOULD TEND TO OPEN THE WINDOW. WITH THE LOAD REMOVED, APPLY THE MANIPULATION TEST DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (B)(3)(1), SUPRA. (F) WITH THE MOVABLE PANEL LIFTED UPWARD TO ITS FULL LIMIT WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE DOOR FRAME, A CONCENTRATED LOAD OF EIGHT HUNDRED (800) POUNDS SHALL BE APPLIED SEPARATELY TO EACH VERTICAL PULL STILE INCORPORATING A LOCKING DEVICE, AT A POINT ON THE STILE WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF THE LOCKING DEVICE, IN THE DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS THAT WOULD TEND TO OPEN THE DOOR. WITH THE LOAD REMOVED, DETERMINE IF THE PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE CAN BE UNLOCKED BY MANIPULATION AS DESCRIBED IN TEST (1), INFRA. (E) WITH THE SLIDING SASH LIFTED WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE UPWARD TO THE FULL LIMIT WINDOW FRAME, A CONCENTRATED LOAD OF TWO HUNDRED (200) POUNDS SHALL BE APPLIED SEPARATELY TO EACH SASH MEMBER INCORPORATING A LOCKING DEVICE, AT A POINT ON THE SASH WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF THE LOCKING DEVICE, IN THE DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS THAT WOULD TEND TO OPEN THE WINDOW WHILE, SIMULTANEOUSLY, AN ADDITIONAL CONCENTRATED LOAD OF SEVENTY-FIVE (75) POUNDS IS APPLIED TO THE SAME AREA OF THE SAME SASH MEMBER IN THE DIRECTION PERPENDICULAR TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS TOWARDS THE INTERIOR SIDE OF THE WINDOW. WITH THE LOAD REMOVED, APPLY THE MANIPULATION TEST DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (B)(3)(1), SUPRA. (G) WITH THE MOVABLE PANEL LIFTED UPWARD TO ITS FULL LIMIT WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE DOOR FRAMES, A CONCENTRATED LOAD OF FIFTY (50) POUNDS SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE VERTICAL PULL STILE INCORPORATING A LOCKING DEVICE, AT A POINT ON THE STILE WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF THE LOCKING DEVICE, IN THE DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS THAT WOULD TEND TO OPEN THE DOOR WHILE, SIMULTANEOUSLY, AN ADDITIONAL CONCENTRATED LOAD OF TWO HUNDRED (200) POUNDS IS APPLIED TO THE SAME AREA OF THE SAME STILE IN THE DIRECTION PERPENDICULAR TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS TOWARD THE INTERIOR SIDE OF THE DOOR. WITH LOAD APPLIED, DETERMINE IF THE PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE CAN BE UNLOCKED BY MANIPULATION AS DESCRIBED IN TEST (1), INFRA.

Studio W Architects 424 32nd Street, Suite D/E Newport Beach, California 92663 [ T ] 949.774.2920
(F) WITH THE SLIDING SASH LIFTED WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE UPWARD TO THE FULL LIMIT WINDOW FRAME, A CONCENTRATED LOAD OF TWO HUNDRED (200) POUNDS SHALL BE APPLIED SEPARATELY TO EACH SASH MEMBER INCORPORATING A LOCKING DEVICE, AT A POINT ON THE SASH MEMBER WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF THE LOCKING DEVICE, IN THE DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS THAT WOULD TEND TO OPEN THE WINDOW WHILE, SIMULTANEOUSLY, AN ADDITIONAL CONCENTRATED LOAD OF SEVENTY-FIVE (75) POUNDS IS APPLIED TO THE SAME AREA OF THE SAME SASH MEMBER IN THE DIRECTION PERPENDICULAR TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS TOWARD THE EXTERIOR SIDE OF THE WINDOW. WITH THE LOAD REMOVED, APPLY THE MANIPULATION TEST DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (B)(3)(1), SUPRA. www.StudioW- Architects.com (H) REPEAT TEST (G) SUBSTITUTING EIGHT HUNDRED (800) POUNDS FOR THE INDICATED FIFTY (50) POUNDS. PERFORM THE MANIPULATION TESTS WITH THE LOAD REMOVED. (I) WITH THE MOVABLE PANEL LIFTED UPWARD TO ITS FULL LIMIT WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE DOOR PANEL, A CONCENTRATED LOAD OF FIFTY (50) POUNDS SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE VERTICAL STILE INCORPORATING A LOCKING DEVICE, AT A POINT ON THE STILE WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF THE LOCKING DEVICE, IN THE DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE PLANE OF GLASS THAT WOULD TEND TO OPEN THE DOOR WHILE, SIMULTANEOUSLY, AND ADDITIONAL CONCENTRATED LOAD OF TWO HUNDRED (200) POUNDS IS APPLIED TO THE SAME AREA OF THE SAME STILE IN THE DIRECTION PERPENDICULAR TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS TOWARD THE EXTERIOR SIDE OF THE DOOR. WITH THE LOAD APPLIED, DETERMINE IF THE PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE CAN BE UNLOCKED BY MANIPULATION AS DESCRIBED IN TEST (1), INFRA. (G)
FOR INSIDE SLIDING WINDOWS, REPEAT TEST (F) WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY APPLYING A CONCENTRATED LOAD OF TWENTY- FIVE (25) POUNDS INWARD AT THE END OF THE MOVABLE BOTTOM RAIL NEAR THE MEETING STILE OPPOSITE THE LOCKSTILE. FOR OUTSIDE SLIDING WINDOWS, REPEAT TEST (F) WHILE (J) REPEAT TEST (I) SUBSTITUTING EIGHT HUNDRED (800) POUNDS SIMULTANEOUSLY APPLYING A CONCENTRATED LOAD OF TWENTY- FIVE (25) POUNDS IN THE SAME DIRECTION AS THE PERPENDICULAR LOAD INWARD AT THE END OF THE MOVABLE BOTTOM RAIL NEAR THE MEETING STILE OPPOSITE THE LOCK STILE OUTWARD.

FOR THE INDICATED FIFTY (50) POUNDS. PERFORM THE MANIPULATION TESTS WITH THE LOAD REMOVED. (K)

ARCHI TECT ENGIN

FOR INSIDE SLIDING DOORS, EER
SIMULTANEOUSLY APPLYING A REPEAT TEST (D) WHILE CONCENTRATED LOAD OF FIFTY (50) POUNDS AT THE END OF THE MOVABLE BOTTOM RAIL NEAR THE MEETING STILES INWARD. FOR OUTSIDE SLIDING DOORS, REPEAT TEST (D) WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY APPLYING A CONCENTRATED LOAD OF FIFTY (50) POUNDS AT THE END OF THE MOVABLE BOTTOM RAIL NEAR THE MEETING STILES AND OUTWARD. (H) DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (B)(3)(M), SUPRA. (3) THE TESTS FOR TYPES B AND C WINDOW ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER: (A) WITH THE SWINGING SASH IN THE NORMAL POSITION, APPLY A CONCENTRATED LOAD OF ONE HUNDRED (100) POUNDS WITHIN THREE (3) INCHES OF EACH END OF THE RAIL OR STILE WHICH IS OPPOSITE THE HINGED SIDE, IN THE DIRECTION PERPENDICULAR TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS THAT WOULD TEND TO OPEN THE WINDOW.

PERFORM THE DISASSEMBLY AND MANIPULATION TEST AS
No. C 30345
Ren. 9//30/235
(L) LIFT, PUSH, PULL, OR OTHERWISE MANIPULATE BY HAND THE DOOR RELATIVE TO THE CLEARANCES WITHIN THE FRAME WHILE ATTEMPTING TO OPEN THE DOOR. THIS TEST SHALL BE CONDUCTED CONTINUOUSLY FOR FIVE (5) MINUTES. EXAMINE THE ASSEMBLY AND DETERMINE A METHOD AND POSITION FOR INSERTING A TOOL THROUGH THE ASSEMBLY FROM THE OUTSIDE SO AS TO CONTACT THE PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE OR THE LATCH. TWO (2) DIFFERENT TOOLS SHALL BE USED: A KNIFE OR SPATULA WITH A THIN BLADE APPROXIMATELY ONE-THIRTY- SECOND (1/32) INCH THICK, NOT MORE THAN ONE (1) INCH WIDE AND NO LONGER THAN SIX (6) INCHES; AND A PIECE OF STIFF STEEL WIRE WITH A DIAMETER OF APPROXIMATELY ONE-SIXTEENTH (1/16) INCH. DETERMINE WHETHER IT IS POSSIBLE TOINSERT THE WIRE OR MANIPULATE WITH EITHER OF THESE TOOLS SO AS TO UNLOCK THE DOOR WITHIN A FIVE-MINUTE TIME PERIOD. (B) REPEAT TEST (A) AND CONCENTRATED LOAD OF ONE SIMULTANEOUSLY APPLY A HUNDRED (100) POUNDS ON THE OUTSIDE WITHIN ONE (1) INCH OF THE END OF THE STILE OR RAIL WHICH IS OPPOSITE THE HINGED SIDE, IN A DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE PLANE OF THE GLAZING WHICH WOULD TEND TO DISENGAGE THE LOCK.

DATE SIIGNED: 0190/018/2023

1. This sheet is part of a set and
is not to be used alone. 2. This sheet is not to be used for construction unless the architect's stamp and signature appear on
the drawings and the status box
indicated drawings have been
released for construction. 3. These plans and prints thereof, as instruments of service, are owned by the architect and are for use on this project only. Reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of the architect is forbidden.
(C) WITH THE SWINGING SASH IN THE CONCENTRATED LOAD OF TWO NORMAL POSITION, APPLY A HUNDRED (200) POUNDS ON THE RAIL OR STILE CONTAINING THE LOCKING DEVICE WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF THE LOCK. (D) REPEAT TEST (B) WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY APPLYING TEST (C). (M) WITH THE FOLLOWING TOOLS:

THE MANIPULATION TEST DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (B)(3)(1), SUPRA, SHALL BE APPLIED IN TESTS (A), (B) AND (D) TO THE SASH WITH THE LOAD REMOVED.

1. A KNIFE OR SPATULA WITH A THIN BLADE APPROXIMATELY

4. Copyright Studio W Associates, Inc. 2022. ONE-THIRTY-SECOND (1/32) INCH THICK, NOT MORE THAN ONE (1) INCH WIDE, AND NO LONGER THAN SIX (6) INCHES; AND (E) DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (B)(3)(M), SUPRA. (4) TESTS FOR TYPE D WINDOW ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER: (A) WITH THE SASH IN THE NORMAL POSITION, SIMULTANEOUSLY PERFORM THE DISASSEMBLY 2. A STRAIGHT OR PHILLIPS AND MANIPULATION TEST AS SCREWDRIVER WITH A MAXIMUM SIX NO
. REM ARKS DA
(6) INCH TE SHAFT. REMOVE FROM THE DOOR ASSEMBLY ALL SCREWS, GLAZING HEADS, OR OTHER MECHANICAL FASTENERS WHICH CAN BE REMOVED READILY FROM THE EXTERIOR WITHIN A TIME LIMIT OF FIVE (5) MINUTES. DETERMINE IF THE PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE CAN BE UNLOCKED OR ENTRY GAINED BY MANIPULATION AS DESCRIBED IN TEST (1), INFRA.

APPLY A CONCENTRATED LOAD OF ONE HUNDRED (100) POUNDS WITHIN THREE (3) INCHES OF THE ENDS OF EACH RAIL OR STILE WHICH IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE PIVOT SIDES IN THE DIRECTION THAT WOULD TEND TO OPEN THE SASH. (4) FIXED PANELS. FIXED PANELS SHALL BE FASTENED IN(B) WITH THE SASH IN THE ACCORDANCE WITH THE NORMAL POSITION, APPLY A MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. TESTS SHALL BE PERFORMED IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER:

CONCENTRATED LOAD OF ONE HUNDRED (100) POUNDS ON THE RAIL OR STILE CONTAINING THE PIVOT WITHIN ONE (1) INCH OF THE PIVOT IN A DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE PIVOTS. (A) WITH THE PANELS IN THE CONCENTRATED LOAD OF THREE NORMAL POSITION, A HUNDRED (300) POUNDS SHALL BE APPLIED AT MIDSPAN OF THE FIXED JAMBSTILE IN THE DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS THAT WOULD TEND TO REMOVE THE FIXED PANEL FROM THE FRAME JAMB POCKET. WITH THE LOAD APPLIED, DETERMINE IF ENTRY CAN BE GAINED BY MANIPULATION AS DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (B)(3)(1), INFRA. (C) OR STILE. (D)

REPEAT TEST (B), APPLYING THE LOAD TO THE OPPOSITE RAIL DA WITH THE SASH IN THE TE NORMAL POSITION, APPLY A DSA PLAN CHECK CONCENTRATED LOAD OF TWO HUNDRED (200) POUNDS ON THE RAIL OR STILE CONTAINING THE LOCKING DEVICE WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF THE LOCK.

DSA BACK CHECK

BIDDING
(B) WITH THE PANELS IN THE NORMAL POSITION, A (E) REPEAT TEST (D) WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY APPLYING THE CONCENTRATED LOAD OF THREE HUNDRED (300) POUNDS SHALL BE APPLIED AT MIDSPAN OF THE FIXED JAMBSTILE IN THE DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS THAT WOULD TEND TO REMOVE THE FIXED PANEL FROM THE FRAME JAMB POCKET WHILE, SIMULTANEOUSLY, AN ADDITIONAL CONCENTRATED LOAD OF ONE HUNDRED FIFTY (150) POUNDS IS APPLIED AT MIDSPAN OF THE FIXED PANEL INTERLOCK STILE IN THE DIRECTION PERPENDICULAR TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS WHICH WOULD TEND TO DISENGAGE THE MEETING STILES. WITH THIS LOAD APPLIED, DETERMINE IF ENTRY CAN BE GAINED BY MANIPULATION AS DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (B)(3)(1), INFRA.

LOAD SPECIFIED IN TEST (B). REPEAT TEST (D) WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY APPLYING THE LOAD SPECIFIED IN TEST (C) ABOVE. THE MANIPULATION TEST DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (B)(3)(1), SUPRA, SHALL BE APPLIED IN TESTS (A), (B), (C) AND (D) ABOVE TO THE SASH WITH THE LOAD REMOVED.

CONSTR UCTION
KEY
(F) DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION PLAN
(B)(3)(M), SUPRA. (5) A WINDOW ASSEMBLY SHALL FAIL THESE TESTS IF AT ANY

PERFORM THE DISASSEMBLY AND MANIPULATION TEST AS
TIME DURING OR AFTER THE TESTS, THE ASSEMBLY DOES NOT REMAIN ENGAGED, INTACT, AND IN THE CLOSED AND LOCKED POSITION, OR BY MANIPULATING EXPOSED COMPONENT; OR IF ONE CAN ENTER THROUGH DISPLACED OR DAMAGED PORTIONS. (C) REPEAT TEST (A) WITH THE ITS FULL LIMIT WITHIN THE CONFINES FIXED PANEL LIFTED UPWARD TO OF THE DOOR FRAME. THE LIFTING FORCE NEED NOT EXCEED ONE HUNDRED FIFTY (150) POUNDS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE MEETING STILE. WITH THIS LOAD APPLIED, DETERMINE IF ENTRY CAN BE GAINED BY MANIPULATION AS DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (B)(3)(1), INFRA. (6) THE REPORT SHALL CONTAIN A DESCRIPTION OF THE RESULTS OF THE TEST PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TEST METHODS ABOVE. THE REPORT SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: IDENTIFICATION OF THE SAMPLES TESTED; TYPE, LOCATION, AND NUMBER OF ANCHORS; TYPE AND THICKNESS OF GLAZING MATERIAL AND AN INDICATION OF WHETHER OR NOT THE SUBJECT PASSED THE TEST. THE REPORT SHALL ALSO INDICATE AT WHAT POINT THE ASSEMBLY FAILS. THE TEST REPORT SHALL BC CERTIFIED TO BE A TRUE COPY BY THE TESTING LABORATORY AND SHALL BE FORWARDED DIRECT FROM THE LABORATORY TO THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY. (5) A SLIDING DOOR ASSEMBLY ANY TIME DURING OR AFTER THE SHALL FAIL THESE TESTS IF AT TEST, THE SLIDING DOOR ASSEMBLY DOES NOT REMAIN ENGAGED, INTACT, AND IN THE CLOSED AND LOCKED POSITION OR BY MANIPULATING AN EXPOSED COMPONENT; OR IF ONE CAN ENTER THROUGH DISPLACED OR DAMAGED PORTIONS. (6) THE REPORT SHALL INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: IDENTIFICATION OF THE SAMPLES TESTED; TYPE, SIZE, LOCATION, AND NUMBER OF LOCKING DEVICES; TYPE, LOCATION, AND NUMBER OF ANCHORS; TYPE AND THICKNESS OF GLAZING MATERIAL AND AN INDICATION OF WHETHER OR NOT THE SUBJECT PASSED THE TEST. THE REPORT SHALL ALSO INDICATE AT WHAT POINT THE ASSEMBLY FAILS. THE REPORT SHALL BE CERTIFIED TO BE A TRUE COPY BY THE TESTING LABORATORY AND SHALL BE FORWARDED DIRECT FROM THE LABORATORY TO THE ENFORCING AUTHORITY.

VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACAD
EMY 2609 W 5TH STREET
SANTA ANA, CA 92703
(C)
(1)
WINDOW CLASSIFICATIONS. TYPE A WINDOW ASSEMBLIES SASHES THAT OPEN BY SLIDING IN INCORPORATE ONE (1) OR MORE THE PLANE OF THE WALL IN WHICH THE WINDOW IS INSTALLED. (2) TYPE B WINDOW ASSEMBLIES FRAMED SASHES WHICH ARE HINGED INCORPORATE ONE (1) OR MORE AT OR NEAR TWO (2) CORNERS OF THE INDIVIDUAL SASH AND OPEN TOWARD THE EXTERIOR OF THE WALL.

CONDITION

AL USE PERMIT
(3) TYPE C WINDOW ASSEMBLIES MORE SASHES WHICH OPEN TOWARD INCORPORATE ONE (1) OR THE INTERIOR AND ARE HINGED AT OR NEAR TWO (2) CORNERS OF THE SASH. (4) TYPE D WINDOW ASSEMBLIES INCORPORATE ONE (1) OR VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL MORE SASHES WHICH ARE HINGED OR PIVOT NEAR THE CENTER SO THAT PART OF THE SASH OPENS INTO THE INTERIOR WALL AND PART OPENS TOWARD THE EXTERIOR. (D) (1) MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. INSTALL THE WINDOW ASSEMBLY IN A TEST FIXTURE WHICH SIMULATES THE WALL CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 25 OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. THE UNIT SHALL BE FULLY GLAZED. THE SASH SHALL BE CLOSED AND LOCKED WITH THE PRIMARY LOCKING DEVICE ONLY.

WINDOW TESTS/PROCEDURES. WINDOW ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE MOUNTED FOLLOWING THE PHASE
IV 601 N FAIRVIEW, SANTA ANA, CA
92703
(2) PERFORMED IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER: (A) WITH THE SLIDING SASH IN THE NORMAL POSITION, A

TESTS FOR TYPE A WINDOW ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE
CONCENTRATED LOAD OF TWO HUNDRED (200) POUNDS SHALL BE APPLIED SEPARATELY TO EACH MEMBER INCORPORATING A LOCKING DEVICE, AT A POINT ON THE SASH MEMBER WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF THE LOCKING DEVICE, IN THE DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS THAT WOULD TEND TO OPEN THE WINDOW. WITH THE LOAD REMOVED, APPLY THE MANIPULATION TEST DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (B)(3)(1), SUPRA.

POLICE DEPARTM ENTNOTES
(B) WITH THE SLIDING SASH IN THE NORMAL POSITION, A
CONCENTRATED LOAD OF TWO HUNDRED (200) POUNDS SHALL BE APPLIED SEPARATELY TO EACH SASH MEMBER INCORPORATING A LOCKING DEVICE, AT A POINT ON THE SASH MEMBER WITHIN SIX (6) INCHES OF THE LOCKING DEVICE IN THE DIRECTION PARALLEL TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS THAT WOULD TEND TO OPEN THE WINDOW WHILE, SIMULTANEOUSLY, AN ADDITIONAL CONCENTRATED LOAD OF SEVENTY-FIVE (75) POUNDS IS APPLIED IN THE SAME AREA OF THE SAME SASH MEMBER IN THE DIRECTION PERPENDICULAR TO THE PLANE OF THE GLASS TOWARD THE INTERIOR SIDE OF THE WINDOW. WITH THE LOAD REMOVED, APPLY THE MANIPULATION TEST DESCRIBED IN SUBSECTION (B)(3)(1), SUPRA.

Date
190/01/ 2023
Project Number
22037 Application Number XX- XXXXXX
Drawing Number
A

0. 8
Dra
wn
Chec
Aut ked
hor Chec ker
City Council 26 – 43 1/16/2024
140 Newport Center Drive, Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 O: 949.478.8800 www.kpff. com
CONSULT ANTS:

SEE OFFSITE

IMPROVEMEN T PLANS

SEE ENLARGED
PLAN "A", HEREON
DAT E
ISSUED FOR:

Dat
e:
6/23/2
Project 023
Number:

Drawn By: Checked By: Scale:
22001
33 TN
AK

AS SPECIFIE D
SHE
City Council 26 – 44 1/16/2024
ET:

City Council 26 – 45 1/16/2024
City Council 26 – 46 1/16/2024
City Council 26 – 47 1/16/2024

ARCHI TECT ENGIN
EER
No. C Ren. 30345
9/30/235
DATE SIGNED: 09/08/2023
9 City Council 26 – 48 1/16/2024
KEYN
NUMB
ER
00 OTES
206
00 207
00 208
00 209
02 222
02 223
02 225
02 226
02 227
02 228

NOT REMOVE (E) CONCRETE EWALKWAY REMOVE (E) PLANTER
BLACKOUT (E) ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL, TYP. BLACKOUT (E) STRIPING, TYP. (E) MAIN FIRE CONTROL
(E) TRANSFOR MER
(E) BUSINESS PARK PARKING
(E) DROP OFF
(E) TRASH ENCLOSURE
(E) WATER VALVE
GENERA

1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 6'-0" HIGH TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION

L NOTES

BARRIER WITH VISION SCREEN AT STAGING, STORAGE AND CONSTRUCTION AREA WITH SIGNAGE EVERY 20'-0" TO WARN STUDENTS OF CONSTRUCTION AREA.

2. 3. CONTRACTOR TO BRING IN OFFICE TRAILER TO CONSTRUCTION AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL ACCESS THE SITE FROM _____________. ANY DAMAGE TO FIRE LANE WILL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
15 4.

5. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR BACK TO EXISTING CONDITIONS ALL LAYDOWN AREAS AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS INCLUDES LANDSCAPE AREAS AND ANY BROKEN SPRINKLERS, VALVE BOXES, CONCRETE, ASPHALT, ETC. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE, RECONSTRUCT AND REPAIR ALL EXISTING WORK THAT IS IMPACTED, DAMAGED, OR DESTROYED AS A RESULT OF ANY CONTRACTOR WORK INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, HARDSCAPING, SIDEWALKS, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, LANDSCAPING, LAWNS, STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES - ALL TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DISTRICT.

6. 7.

WHERE ASPHALT OR CONCRETE IS BEING REPATCHED, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE EVEN AND STRAIGHT LINE CUTS WITH 2-FOOT STRAIGHT SLURRY SEAL SURFACE PATCH ON BOTH SIDES OF CUT.

Studio W Architects 424 32nd Street, Suite D/E Newport Beach, California 92663 [ T ] 949.774.2920

CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN EXCAVATING AND TRENCHING ON SITE TO AVOID EXISTING DUCTS, PIPING OR CONDUITS, ETC., AND TO PREVENT HAZARDS TO PERSONNEL AND/OR DAMAGE TO EXISTING

UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN AND INSTALLED BY ANY OTHER CONTRACTS. THE ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE

FOR THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN OR DETAILED AND INSTALLED BY ANY OTHER CONTRACTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT SHOULD SUCH UNIDENTIFIED CONDITIONS BE DISCOVERED. THESE DRAWINGS AND

SPECIFICATIONS DO NOT INCLUDE THE NECESSARY ELEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY.
www.StudioW- Architects.com
(E) BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHE D
UNDER PERMIT # 101112017
12,186 SF

8. GATES IN PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL COMPLY WITH EXIT DOOR REQUIREMENTS WITH PROPER LEVER HARDWARE AND KICK PLATES.

9. 10.THE PROJECT REQUIRES A 02 LOT MERGER APPLICATION
223 1 ALL IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AND INSTALLED BY THE DEVELOPER AND/OR THE DEVELOPER EXPENSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND THE APPROVED STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS. ALL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA) RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE

IMPLEMENTED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING PERMIT, SOLELY AT THE DEVELOPER'S

EXPENSE
00 207
00 206 FH 11.
(E) BUILDING TOBE RENOVA TED
5 PARC EL 4 ARCHII TECT ENGIN 5,837 SF EER PARKING ANALYSIS 00 208 1 1 No. C 30345
Ren. 9//30/235
68'- 6" 8
8 PARKING
1 REQUIRED 65'- 8" CLASSROOM 1 8 CURRENT REQUIREMENTS
SETBACK: # OF CLASSROO MS

PARKING FACTOR

REQUIRED
39 02 222 FRONT: 20FT ON AN ARTERIAL STREET
CURRENT PARKING FORMULA:

DATE SIIGNED: 1.5 0190/018/2023 SPACES/CLAS
SROOM 02 225

1. This sheet is part of a set and
is not to be used alone. 2. This sheet is not to be used for construction unless the architect's stamp and signature appear on
the drawings and the status box
indicated drawings have been
released for construction. 3. These plans and prints thereof, as instruments of service, are owned by the architect and are for use on this project only. Reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of the architect is forbidden.
00 PARC 209 EL 2 1 59 SPACE
S
FIVE (5) SPACES FOR EACH ONE THOUSAND (1,000) SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR 1 AREA OFFICE REQUIREMEN TS

OFFICE SPACE SF

PARKING FACTOR

REQUIRED
1 1 4 1
1,53
4 4. Copyright Studio W Associates, Inc. 2022.
1 1 SPACE/3
33 SF
5 SPACES
26 NO
. REM ARKS DATE
02 227 TOTAL REQUIREME NTS

CLASSROOM S
5 (E) BUILDIN G
SIZE: 19,100 SF USE: BUSINES S
59 SPACE
S
5 SPACE
S
64 SPACE
S
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V-B HEIGHT: 19'-0" ROOF CONSTRUCTION: CLASS A RATED

OFFICE SPACE
REQUIR
ED
02 226 DA
TE 1 DSA PLAN CHECK 02 228 PARKING PROVIDED DSA BACK CHECK

BIDDING

HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE

COMPACT SPACES

CLEAN AIR VEHICLE PARKING

PARKING
18 CONSTR
29 UCTION
PARC EL 1 6 11 KEY
12 PLAN
0 17
8 (E) VISTA GLOBAL ACADEMIES
TOTAL SIZE: PROVIDED 46,992 SF USE: EDUCATI ON
CONSTRUCTIO N TYPE: V-B HEIGHT: 25'-0" ROOF CONSTRUCTION: CLASS A RATED 38 1
1 PARC EL 3 VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL
(E) BUILDIN G(E) BUILDIN G ACAD
EMY 2609 W 5TH STREET
SANTA ANA, CA 92703

CONDITION

AL USE PERMIT
27 1 12 30 LEG END VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL
PHASE
IV 601 N FAIRVIEW, SANTA ANA, CA
92703
PROPER

TY LINE
1 20 12 17 TO BE DEMOLISE D
(E) 4'-0" TALL 2 RAIL WROUGHT IRON FENCE
(E) FIRE HYDRANT
FH
W 5TH ST

SITE PLAN DEMO
(E) TRAFFIC CIRCULATION - PICKUP AND DROP-OFF
Dat
e Project N 190/01/ Number
2023
220
37 Application Number Drawing XX- Number
XXXX
XX
A

1. 0
REF: 6 / A5.1 Dra
wn
Chec 1 ked 0 OVERALL SITE PLAN - DEMO
1" = 30'-0" Aut hor Chec ker
City Council 26 – 49 1/16/2024

CLEAN AIR VEHICLE PARKING
BASED ON CalGreen 2022 PART 11, TABLE 5.106.5.2 & 5.106.5.3.3 TOTAL NUMBER OFPARKING SPACES

NUMBER OF REQUIRED

CLEAN AIR VEHICLE SPACES

NUMBER OF REQUIRED
CHARGING 0 TO SPACES
9 0 0
10 TO 25
26 TO 50
4 0
8 2
51 TO 7513 3
76 TO 100
101 TO 150
151 TO 200
201 and
over
17 4
25 35
6 9
20 percent of total¹25 percent of EV capable spaces
2 ¹ Calculation for spaces shall be
rounded up to the nearest whole
number 2 The number of required EVCS
(EV capable spaces provided with EVSE) in column 3 count toward the total number of required EV capable spaces shown in column 2. 72'- 2"
TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED:18 STALL EV CHARGING S
SPACES PROVIDED:
0 STAL
LS
4 STAL
LS
DESIGNATED CLEAN AIR PARKING PROVIDED: ACCESSIBL E PARKING BASED ON CBC 2022, TABLE 11B-208.2 "PARKING SPACES" TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES MINIMUM NUMBER OF REQUIRED

ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES
PROVIDED IN PARKING FACILITY1 TO 25
26 TO 50
51 TO 75
76- 100
1 Studio W Architects 424 32nd Street, Suite D/E Newport Beach, California 92663 [ T ] 949.774.2920
2 (E) SITE BOLLARDS DROP REF: 6 OFF / A5.1
3 4 SITE PLAN - TURN 1 AROUND ANALYSIS
1" = 20'-0" www.StudioW- Architects.com
101- 1505
151- 2006
201- 3007
301- 4008
401- 5009
501- 1000
1001 AND OVER
2 PERCENT OF TOTAL 20, PLUS 1 FOR EACH 100, OR FRACTION THEREOF, OVER STANDARD 1000
PARKING PROVIDED:

ACCESSIBLE PARKING REQUIRED:

ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED:
18 STALL S1 STAL
L ARCHI TECT ENGIN 2 STANDARD + 1 VAN STALL EER PARKING ANALYSIS PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING No. C 30345 Ren. 9/30/25 5764 SF OF OFFICE / 333 SF =
18 18
71 TOTAL NUMBER OF SPACES REQ'D = TOTAL NUMBER OF SPACES PROVIDED = DATE SIGNED: 10/01/2023

FH 5A1. PROPOSED 2 RENOVATION BUILDING COMMU NITY GARD EN

4. Copyright Studio W Associates, Inc. 2022. 2297 PARC SF EL 4 NO
. REM ARKS DA GENERAL TE

1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 6'-0" HIGH TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION NOTES

BARRIER WITH VISION SCREEN AT STAGING, STORAGE AND CONSTRUCTION AREA WITH SIGNAGE EVERY 20'-0" TO WARN STUDENTS OF CONSTRUCTION AREA.
(E) PARKING LOT PARC EL 2 2. 3. CONTRACTOR TO BRING IN OFFICE TRAILER TO CONSTRUCTION AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL ACCESS THE SITE FROM _____________. ANY DAMAGE TO FIRE LANE WILL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.

4. 5.

CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR BACK TO EXISTING CONDITIONS ALL LAYDOWN AREAS AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS INCLUDES LANDSCAPE AREAS AND ANY BROKEN SPRINKLERS, VALVE BOXES, CONCRETE, ASPHALT, ETC. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE, RECONSTRUCT AND REPAIR ALL EXISTING WORK THAT IS IMPACTED, DAMAGED, OR DESTROYED AS A RESULT OF ANY CONTRACTOR WORK INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, HARDSCAPING, SIDEWALKS, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, LANDSCAPING, LAWNS, STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES - ALL TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DISTRICT.

DA
TE PLAY FIELD 7372 SF

DSA PLAN DSA CHECK BACK CHECK

BIDDING
PLAY YARD 4640 SF CONSTR UCTION

6. 7.

WHERE ASPHALT OR CONCRETE IS BEING REPATCHED, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE EVEN AND STRAIGHT LINE CUTS WITH 2-FOOT STRAIGHT SLURRY SEAL SURFACE PATCH ON BOTH SIDES OF CUT.

CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN EXCAVATING AND TRENCHING ON SITE TO AVOID EXISTING DUCTS, PIPING OR CONDUITS, ETC., AND TO PREVENT HAZARDS TO PERSONNEL AND/OR DAMAGE TO EXISTING

UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN AND INSTALLED BY ANY OTHER CONTRACTS. THE ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE

SPECIFICATIONS DO NOT INCLUDE THE NECESSARY ELEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY. GATES IN PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL COMPLY WITH EXIT DOOR REQUIREMENTS WITH PROPER LEVER HARDWARE AND KICK PLATES. ALL IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED AND INSTALLED BY THE DEVELOPER AND/OR THE DEVELOPER EXPENSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND THE APPROVED STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS.
(E) BUILDIN G

KEY PLAN
1 PARC EL 1 6 8.

9. (E) VISTA GLOBAL ACADEMIES SIZE: 66,181 SF USE: EDUCATI ONHEIGHT: 25'-0"

10. ALL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA) RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE

IMPLEMENTED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING PERMIT, SOLELY AT THE DEVELOPER'S

EXPENSE
PARC EL 3 38

LEG END

VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL
1 1 ACAD
EMY 2609 W 5TH STREET

PROPOSED RENOVATION BUILDING
(E) BUILDIN G(E) BUILDIN G SANTA ANA, CA 92703
(N) CONCRE
TE

CONDITION

AL USE PERMIT
(N) LANDSCAPE
27 1 12 PLANTING

VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL

PROPOSED PLAY FIELD
NEXXFIELD: SYNTHETIC TURF - X- GEN-E2 PHASE
IV 601 N FAIRVIEW, SANTA ANA, CA
92703
20'-0" FIRE LANE / 1 20 12 17 EMERGENCY VEHICLE
(E) TRUNCATED DOMES

PROPERTY LINE
FH
LIMIT OF WORK W 5TH ST

FRONT SETBACK SITE PLAN OVERAL
L
(E) FIRE HYDRANT
FIRE HOSE PULL (150')
(N) ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL Date
10/01/ 2023
Project Number
22037
(N) 6'-0" TALL 2 RAIL N WROUGHT IRON FENCE
(E) 4'-0" TALL 2 RAIL WROUGHT IRON FENCE

SITE GATE
Application Number XX- XXXXXXDrawing Number
A

1. 1
REF: 6 / A5.1 Dra
wn
Chec 1 ked 0 OVERALL SITE PLAN
1" = 40'-0" Aut hor Chec ker
City Council 26 – 50 1/16/2024

GENERAL

1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 6'-0" NOTES

HIGH TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION

BARRIER WITH VISION SCREEN AT STAGING, STORAGE AND CONSTRUCTION AREA WITH SIGNAGE EVERY 20'-0" TO WARN STUDENTS OF CONSTRUCTION AREA.

2. 3. CONTRACTOR TO BRING IN OFFICE TRAILER TO CONSTRUCTION AREA. CONTRACTOR SHALL ACCESS THE SITE FROM _____________. ANY DAMAGE TO FIRE LANE WILL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.

4. 5.

6. 7.

WHERE ASPHALT OR CONCRETE IS BEING REPATCHED, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE EVEN AND STRAIGHT LINE CUTS WITH 2-FOOT STRAIGHT SLURRY SEAL SURFACE PATCH ON BOTH SIDES OF CUT.
6'-4" WELDED WIRE MESH FENCING PER METROLINK ENG STD 5105 ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE. SEE DETAIL 12/A10.2 10 CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN EXCAVATING AND TRENCHING ON SITE TO AVOID EXISTING DUCTS, PIPING OR CONDUITS, ETC., AND TO PREVENT HAZARDS TO PERSONNEL AND/OR DAMAGE TO EXISTING

UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN AND INSTALLED BY ANY OTHER CONTRACTS. THE ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE

TRASH ENCLOSUR EW/ SOLID ROOF.
(E) TRANSFOR MER

8. 9. FLOWERING VINE OVER CMU WALL TO REDUCE GRAFFITI AND SOFTEN APPEARANCE. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH MAIN BUILDING
1 COMPACT PARKING 10. ALL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TIA) RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE

IMPLEMENTED PRIOR TO THE BUILDING PERMIT, SOLELY AT THE DEVELOPER'S

EXPENSE
(E) BOLLARDS. TYP.

SWINGING DECORATIVE HEAVY GAUGE METAL DOUBLE-DOOR ACCESS GATE. CANE BOLTS ON THE DOORS TO SECURE GATE WHEN IN OPEN POSITION. SHALL BESELF-CLOSING.

Studio W Architects 424 32nd Street, Suite D/E Newport Beach, California 92663 [ T ] 949.774.2920
6' UTILITY EASEMENT RECORDING NO. 87-274683 1 www.StudioW- Architects.com A6. RECONSTRUCTED 2 COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APPROACH. SEE STREET IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SHEET 3.

PEDESTRI AN GATE 1
1 PCC SIDEWALK. SEE STREET IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SHEET 3. 7 UTILITY TRENCH FOR IRRIGATION LINE TO SERVICE METER . SEE STREET 5 IMPROVEMENTS PLAN SHEET 3 1 LEG END

ARCHII TECT ENGIN

CLEAN AIR / EER
VANPOOL EV PARKING. TYP. PROPOSED RENOVATION BUILDING
No. C 30345
Ren. 1 9//30/235 7

FH (N) CONCRE
TE
ORNAMENTAL WROUGHT IRON GATE FENCING. SEE 1/A10.2. TYP. 1 DATE SIIGNED: G11 0190/018/2023 0
2 1. This sheet is part of a set and
is not to be used alone. 2. This sheet is not to be used for construction unless the architect's stamp and signature appear on
the drawings and the status box
indicated drawings have been
released for construction. 3. These plans and prints thereof, as instruments of service, are owned by the architect and are for use on this project only. Reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of the architect is forbidden.

A6. 2
(E) PARKING LOT
9 (N) LANDSCAPE PLANTING
(E) LANDSCAPE PLANTING
3 A6. 1
2 PROPOSED RENOVATION BUILDING 4. Copyright Studio W Associates, Inc. 2022. NO . REM ARKS DATE
5 PROPOSED TRASH PLAY FIELD

ENCLOSUR EW/ SOLID ROOF
NEXXFIELD: SYNTHETIC TURF - X- PARCEL C C/L OF GEN-E2 DRAINAGE EASEMENT RUNS ALONG SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY.

COMMUNITY GARDEN 10 PARC EL 4
2297 SF INSTRUMENT NO. 87-343208
20'-0" FIRE LANE / EMERGENCY VEHICLE
(E) TRUNCATED DOMES
PARCEL C 2.5' ROOF OVERHANG EASEMENT. INSTRUMENT NO. 87-343208 DA
DSA TE

PLAN CHECK
10 DSA BACK CHECK

BIDDING
1 CONSTR DRIVE UCTION AISLE COMMUNITY (E) PARKING GARDEN

LOT KEY PLAN

PROPERT Y LINE

LIMIT OF WORK

FRONT SETBACK
86'- 0"
(E) FIRE FIRE HYDRANT

ACCESS GATE WITH KNOX BOX SIZE
(E) TRAS H
ENCLO
SURE
PLAY FIELD 7372 SF VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL
FIRE HOSE PULL (150') ACAD
EMY 2609 W 5TH STREET

ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL AND

PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY
PLAY YARD 4640 SF
PARC EL 2
SANTA ANA, CA 92703
6'-0" TALL 2 RAIL WROUGHT IRON FENCE. SEE DETAIL 1/A10.2.

CONDITION

AL USE PERMIT
(E) 4'-0" TALL 2 RAIL WROUGHT IRON FENCE

VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL
IR
R

PROPOSED

IRRIGATION
(E) TREE TO REMAIN
PHASE
IV 601 N FAIRVIEW, SANTA ANA, CA
92703
(E) BUILDIN G

TREE, REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS

ENLARGE D SITE PLAN

SITE GATE
LIGHT POLE. REFER TO

ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS
Dat
e Project N 190/01/ Number
2023
220
37 Application Number Drawing XX- Number
XXXX
XX
A

1. 2
REF: 10 / A1.1 Dra
wn
Chec ENLARGED 5 ked SITE PLAN
1" = 15'-0" Aut hor Chec ker
City Council 26 – 51 1/16/2024
KEYN
NUMB
ER
02 OTES
231
02 232
02 305
02 309
08 321
10 507
NOT
(E) E

ELECTRICAL METERS
(E) DRAIN PIPES
(E) COLUMN
5 4 3
(E) FIRE SPRINKLER PIPE

PICKET FENCE SLIDING GATE

EQUIPMENT BOX
4 ZA9 .2
8 B
C
MEZZA NINE116 MEZZA NINE D
N 116
28'- 11"
D
N
2'- 8" 7'- 4" 2'- 2" 16A2. 10'- 1 0"
Studio W Architects 424 32nd Street, Suite D/E Newport Beach, California 92663 [ T ] 949.774.2920
4 REF: 6 / A2.1 REF: 6 / ZA6.1 www.StudioW- 1 Architects.com 6 ENLARGED STAIR 6 PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"MEZZANINE PLAN 1/8" = 1'- 0"

ARCHIITE

ECTT ENGINEER
No. C 30345
Ren. 9//30/235
8 7 5 4 3 GENERA

L NOTES
6 A5. 1
7 1 DATE SIIGNED: ZA6 0190/018/2023
.1 1. This sheet is part of a set and
is not to be used alone. 2. This sheet is not to be used for construction unless the architect's stamp and signature appear on
the drawings and the status box
indicated drawings have been
released for construction. 3. These plans and prints thereof, as instruments of service, are owned by the architect and are for use on this project only. Reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of the architect is forbidden.

GENE RAL 117'- 9" 1.

2. 3.

4. 5.

6. FOR PLUMBING FIXTURES, FLOOR DRAINS, CASEWORK, AND OTHER EQUIPMENT - REFER TO EQUIPMENT PLAN. FOR ALL REQUIRED SIGNAGE

INCLUDING ROOM NAME AND NUMBER
THROUGHOUT - REFER TO CODE ANALYSIS PLAN. ALL WALLS SHALL HAVE R-19 BATT

INSULATION, FULL HEIGHT AND SOUND

INSULATION TO BE INSTALLED AT
INTERIOR WALLS. PAINT ALL INTERIOR WALLS. REFER TO ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE FOR INTERIOR WALL FINISHES. DOORS SHALL BE INSTALLED 4" FROM JAMB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIRED DOOR CLEARANCES, SEE DETAIL 1 / ZA10.8 ALL FIRE WALLS THAT HAVE A CONCEALED FLOOR-CEILING ATTIC SPACE

SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY AND PERMANENTLY IDENTIFIED WITH SIGNS OR STENCILING READING "FIRE AND/OR SMOKE BARRIER - PROTECT ALL OPENINGS" IN THE CONCEALED SPACE. THE IDENTIFICATION SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 15 FEET OF THE END OF EACH WALL AT INTERVALS NOT EXCEEDING 30 FEET HORIZONTALLY. THE LETTERING SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 3" TALL AND HAVE A MINIMUM STROKE OF 3/8".
27'- 8"
105 A
A C 4'- 11"
104A
C D 4. Copyright Studio W Associates, Inc. 2022. C
NO
. REM ARKS DA MOTH TE ER'S ROO M
102
102 A STOR AGE STOR 10 AGE 3
10 RECEP 4 TION101 101 B CUSTO DIAN CLOS ET

ALL GENDE R
RR ALL GENDER 113
STRUC
TURE 114 BOA RDROO M
105

1. DIMENSIONS OF WALLS ARE FROM FACE OF STUD UNLESS OTHERWISE 7 J NOT ED. A5. 1 R R
112
UP 2. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR HEADER SCHEDULE AND

FRAMING DETAILS FOR OPENINGS IN
INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR WALLS. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR FRAMING SIZE AND SPACING. SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR COLUMN LOCATIONS AND SIZING.

3. 4. DA 6'- TE 9" 11'- 2" 11'- 2" DSA PLAN DSA CHECK BACK CHECK

BIDDING
114 A
CONSTR UCTION 113 A 02 305 FC 105 B
106 A
1 02 305 112 A
115D
ZA7 .1 106
B B B KEY OFFI CE11
H PLAN
IT 0 CLOS ET
10A5. 1
110 A CONFER ENCE 111 10
109 6
A G 02 231
10 507
H OPEN OFFICE 11 OFFI CE 5 08 321 109 RO ACC OF ESS11 108 7 A H G
SI M.
107 A
LUNCH/ BREAK 6 6 ROOM107
ZA6 .1 HUD DLE SPA CE108ZA6 .1 VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL
107 B
115 B115 E
115 A C A ACAD
EMY 2609 W 5TH STREET
SANTA ANA, CA 92703
F E 02 309
02 232
02 232 7 19'-
ZA6 8"
.1 74'- 7" 9
A5. 1 CONDITION

AL USE PERMIT
6 2
LEG FIRST FLOOR AREA: 5,837 SF (INCLUDING MEZZ.) END VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL PHASE
IV 601 N FAIRVIEW, SANTA ANA, CA
92703
A10
1A
A

DOOR NUMBER, SEE DOOR SCHEDULE

WINDOW, STOREFRONT, OR CURTAINWALL SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE
(E) EXTERIOR 8" CMU WALL
(E) EXTERIOR 6" WOOD STUD WALL
INTERIOR 4" WOOD STUD WALL
INTERIOR 6" WOOD STUD WALL
INTERIOR 1-HOUR RATED WALL
FLOO
R PLAN
Dat
e Project 190/01/ Number
2023
220
37 Application Number Drawing XX- Number
XXXX
XX
A

2. 1
REF: 6 / A5.1 Dra
wn
Chec 1 ked 0
FLOOR PLAN 1/8" =
1'-0"
Aut hor Chec ker
City Council 26 – 52 1/16/2024
KEYN
NUMB
ER
02 OTES
208
02 215
02 217
07 203
NOT
(E) HVAC EQUIPMENT E
(E) EXHAUST FAN
(E) ROOF DRAIN

POLYURETHANE ELASTOMERIC FLUID- APPLIED ROOFING MEMBRANE SYSTEM: TWO-COAT FLUID-APPLIED ROOFING MEMBRANE FORMULATED FOR APPLICATION OVER PREPARED EXISTING ROOFING SUBSTRATE. BASIS OF DESIGN IS BASED UPON PRODUCTS OF TREMCO, INCORPORATED, ALPHAGUARD BIO BASE COAT. PRODUCT TO INDICATE CRRC COMPLIANCE AND COMPLY WITH SOLAR REFLECTANCE INDEX REQUIREMENTS. REFER TO SHEET A4.2 FOR ROOF SPECIFICATIONS.
08 601
23 701
SKYLI GHT HVAC EQUIPMENT (SEE MECHANICAL DWGS.)
GENERA

1. ROOF PATCHING: REMOVAL OF A PORITON OF EXISTING MEMBRANE L NOTES

ROOFING

SYSTEM FROM DECK OR REMOVAL OF SELECTED COMPONENTS AND

ACCESSORIES FROM EXISTING MEMBRANE ROOFING SYSTEM AND
REPLACEMENT WITH COMPATIBLE SIMILAR MATERIALS.

Studio W Architects 424 32nd Street, Suite D/E Newport Beach, California 92663 [ T ] 949.774.2920
www.StudioW- Architects.com
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
7 ZA6 .1 ARCHI TECT ENGIN
EER
3 T.O. CANOP Y
ZA6
C .3
C No. C 30345
Ren. 9//30/235
02 208 02 208 23 701
DATE SIIGNED: 0190/018/2023

4. Copyright Studio W Associates, Inc. 2022. NO
. REM ARKS DATE
23 701 B
23 701 07 203 23 08 701 601 08 601 DA
TE 08 601 DSA PLAN DSA CHECK BACK CHECK

BIDDING CONSTR UCTION

KEY PLAN
SLO PE SLO PE 02 217 02 A 217 A
(+) 12'- 9 1/2"
T.O. CANOPY
(+) 10'-9 1/2"
T.O. CANOP Y
10'- 0" 21'- 4" 6'- 8" 7 6 ZA6 2
.1

VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACAD
EMY 2609 W 5TH STREET
SANTA ANA, CA 92703

CONDITION

AL USE LEG PERMIT END VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL
PHASE
IV 601 N FAIRVIEW, SANTA ANA, CA
92703
1 SINGLE PLY ROOFING, SEE DETAIL
ZA10
.7.2
15 ROOF ACCESS HATCH, SEE DETAIL
ZA1

0.1 10 ROOF DRAIN AND OVERFLOW, SEE DETAIL
ZA10
.7.1
5 ROOF WALKWAY PADS ROOF PLAN
ZA10
.7.2

ROOF CRICKET, TAPERED RIGID

INSULATION, SLOPED TO DRAIN PER DETAIL
3 ZA10
.7.2 Dat
e Project 190/01/ Number
2023
220
37 SOLAR READY ZONE, SEE CALCULATION ABOVE Application Number Drawing XX- Number XXXX
XX
A

4. 1
Dra
wn
Chec 3 ked 0 ROOF PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0" Aut hor Chec ker
City Council 26 – 53 1/16/2024

ARCHI TECT ENGIN
EER
No. C Ren. 30345
9/30/235
DATE SIGNED: 09/08/2023
9 City Council 26 – 54 1/16/2024
19'-4" T.O. PARAPE T

FAIRVIE W ST (E) SIDEWALK (E) PLANTER (E) DRIVE AISLE
(E) 4'-0" TALL 2 RAIL (E) 4'-0" WROUGHT IRON FENCE TALL 2 RAIL WROUGHT IRON FENCE

89.5 5' 90.1 5' 90.4 4' 88.6 8'

88.2 2'

88.8 6'

88.3 6'
15'-0" SETBAC K REF: 5 / A1.2 1
2 3
SITE SECTION 1
1" = 10'-0"
Studio W Architects 424 32nd Street, Suite D/E Newport Beach, California 92663 [ T ] 949.774.2920

HVAC UNIT
www.StudioW- Architects.com 19'-4" T.O. PARAPE T

FAIRVIE W ST (E) SIDEWA LK(E) PLANTER BEYOND (E) DRIVE AISLE (E) 4'-0" TALL 2 RAIL WROUGHT IRON FENCE
RAMP
(E) DRIVE AISLE

CONC RETE WALK

ARCHI TECT ENGIN
EER 87.2 2'

87.7 4'

88.6 6' 87.9 9'
REF: 5 / A1.2
No. C 30345
Ren. 9//30/235 SITE SECTION 2
1" = 10'-0"
DATE SIIGNED: 0190/018/2023

FAIRVIE W ST (E) SIDEWALK (E) PLANTER (E) DRIVE AISLE

4. Copyright Studio W Associates, Inc. 2022. (E) 4'-0" TALL 2 RAIL WROUGHT IRON FENCE NO . REM ARKS DATE

88.6 6'

87.5 9'

86.1 9' 86.7 8'
DA 87.1 TE
7' 88.0 7' 87.6 0'

DSA PLAN DSA CHECK BACK CHECK

BIDDING
REF: 5 / A1.2 CONSTR SITE UCTION SECTION 3
1" = 10'-0"

KEY PLAN

VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL ACAD
EMY 2609 W 5TH STREET
SANTA ANA, CA 92703

CONDITION

AL USE VISTA PERMIT

CHARTER SCHOOL
PHASE
IV 601 N FAIRVIEW, SANTA ANA, CA
92703 SITE SECTIO
NS
Dat
e Project 190/01/ Number
2023
220
37 Application Number Drawing XX- Number
XXXX
XX
A

6. 2
Dra
wn
Chec
Aut ked
hor Chec ker
City Council 26 – 55 1/16/2024

PRESSE D

STEEL POST CAP
1 3/4" x 11 GA

TOP AND
BOT. RAILS
BRACKE
T BY MFR, FASTEN WITH 1/4"
8'-0" O.C. MAX. SEE DOOR SCHEDULE
4" 48" MAX., TYP.

SELF- CLOSING HINGES: MFR: LOCINOX MAMMOTH SELF CLOSING HINGES MODEL NO: M180-SL (x2) 1"
3" STEEL POST W/ CAP

ALUMI LEVER & NUM
KNOB W/ KEY LOCK, TYP.

DRIVE RIVETS

PAINT KELLY MOORE
KM4092 MT. RUSHM ORE
FENCE PER DETAIL1 3 3/4" A10 TYP.
.2 3" x 12 GA SQ. STEEL POST
1" x 14 GA
3/4" x 14 GA PRESSED PICKETS, TYP. w/ 4" MAX. GAP
PICK
1 1/2" x ET
12GA RAILS, TYP.

ALUMIN

UMDRIVE RIVETS

FINIS HGRA DE
10" SMOOT HMETAL KICK PLATE ATTACHED TO EA. SIDE OF GATE TYP. POST

FOOTI NG, SEE

CONCRETE MOW STRIP WHERE OCCURS PER PLAN, SEE DETAIL
TYP. GATE FOOTIN G, SEE
1 11
1 ZA10 ZA10 .2.3 ZA10 .2.3
.2.3 NOT E: 1.

NOT ES: ALL EXPOSED FIELD WELDS TO BE GROUND SMOOTH AND POINTED WITH 2 COATS ZINC ENRICH GALV. SPRAY, 2 COAT PRIME, 1 COAT EPOXY PAINT, TYP. TO MATCH SHOP COLOR

1. 2. REFER TO HARDWARE GROUP IN SPECIFICATIONS FOR DETAILS ANY CAVITIES CREATED BY ADDING THE KICK PLATE SHALL BE CAPPED ORNAMENTAL PER CBC 11B-404.2.10 DOUBLE GATE - PULL SIDE ELEVATI ON ORNAMENTAL 1/2" = 6 FENCE TYPICAL 1 1'-0"
1/2" = ELEVA 1'-0" TION
7" Studio W Architects 424 32nd Street, Suite D/E Newport Beach, California 92663 [ T ] 949.774.2920
BUILD

ING WALL
www.StudioW1" A- A STEEL Architects.com
FENCE
POST
0 0 A

CONCRET E WALK
7" x 7" x 1/2" STEEL BASE

PLATE, SEE A-A FOR
DIMENSIONS 3/4" NON SHRINK GROUT ARCHI TECT ENGIN (4) HILTI-KB- TZ2 3/8" X 5 1/2" EER

CONCRETE FOOTING PER
STRUCTURAL REF: 4 / DWGS.

A10.2
No. C 30345
Ren. 9//30/235 1
2 STANDARD 5105 WELDED 7 2 WIRE MESH FENCING 1/8" = 1'- 0"
2 RAIL WROUGHT IRON FENCE 3/4" = 1'-
0"
FENCE FOOTING AT BUILDING 3/4" = 1'-0"
DATE SIIGNED: 0190/018/2023

COLUM N, SEE
PLAN

PLAN VIEW

BUILDING WALL, SEE PLAN

4. Copyright Studio W Associates, Inc. 2022. NO
. REM ARKS DATE PANIC BAR EXITING DEVICE ATTACHED TO

GATE FRAME AND BACKING PLATE
ROUND HOLE PERFORATED METAL, GALVANIZED G90 WITH POWDER COATING TO MATCH FENCE, 22 GA., 3/32" HOLES ON 3/16" CENTERS STAGGERED PATTERN 23% OPEN AREA. PROVIDE METAL
'U' EDGING TO COVER

CUT EDGES
14 GA. METAL PLATE BACKING FOR GATE DOOR HARDWARE WELDED TO FRAME COLU MN, SEE PLAN 2'-0" MIN.

EA. SIDE

SEE DOOR SCHEDULE BUILD

ING WALL
4" 48" MAX. WIDTH 1" DA
DSA TE

PLAN DSA CHECK BACK CHECK

BIDDING CONSTR UCTION ORNAM ENTAL FENCE PER DETAIL
1 1/2" POST
3/4" PICKE
T
1 A10 .2 KEY PLAN
2A10
.2
TYP. GATE

FOOTIN G, SEE
1 ZA10
CROWN
.2.3

FOOTING, PROVIDE DRAINAGE
AWAY FROM POST, TYP.
10" SMOOTH METAL KICK

PLATE ATTACHED TO

SIDE OF GATE WITH

VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL

PANIC DOOR HARDWARE ACA
DEM Y

ELEVATIO
N VIEW NOT ES: 2609 W 5TH STREET
SANTA ANA, CA 92703

1. 2. 3. 4.GRIND SMOOTH ALL WELDED JOINTS FOR GATE INFORMATION, SEE GATE SCHEDULE ON SHEET A9.1 ANY CAVITIES CREATED BY ADDING THE KICK PLATE SHALL BE CAPPED PER CBC 11B-404.2.10 FOR PULL SIDE ELEVATION SEE DETAIL 6 A10
.2
4 CONDITION

AL USE PERMIT
ORNAMENTAL DOUBLE GATE 1/2" =
2 1/2" HINGE 1'-0"

CLEA R VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL
20'- 0" 2" x 12 GA SQ. GATE
3" LATCH RAILS CLEAR PHASE
IV 601 N FAIRVIEW, SANTA ANA, CA
92703
6" x 12 GA SQ. STEEL POST W/ CAP
3/4" DIA. HATCH WITH
PADLOCK EYES, TYP.
1" x 14 GA PICKET
4" MAX.

SITE DETAI LS

WELD ON BOX HINGE
(3) PER LEAF
12" DIA. CONCRETE FOOTING

GATE FRAME

TYPICAL POST FOOTING, SEE
1" DIA. PIPE SLEEVE EMBED
IN
CONC 1
RETE
4" DIA. STEEL GATE HEAVY DUTY PIVOTING WHEEL AND BRACKET - GW2 BY NATIONWIDE

INDUSTRIES
Dat
e Project Number
4 ZA10 CANE BOLT,
.2.3 SEE DETAIL ZA10
.2.2 190/01/ 2023
220
37 NOTE: PROVIDE 12" DIA. X
12" DEEP CONCRETE
FOOTING AND 1" PIPE

SLEEVE FOR EACH LEAF IN

THE OPEN POSITION
GATE WHEEL ON OPP. SIDE OF FRAME, EACH LEAF
Application Number Drawing XX- Number
XXXX
XX A1

0.2 Dra
wn
Chec FIRE ACCESS 5 ked ORNAMENTAL GATE
3/8" = 1'-0"
Aut hor Chec ker
City Council 26 – 56 1/16/2024

ARCHI TECT ENGIN
EER
No. C 30345 Ren. 9/30/23
DATE SIGNED: 01/05/2023
City Council 26 – 57 1/16/2024

ARCHI TECT ENGIN
EER
No. C 30345 Ren. 9/30/23
DATE SIGNED: 01/05/2023
City Council 26 – 58 1/16/2024
³
Studio W Architects 424 32nd Street, Suite D/E Newport Beach, California 92663 [ T ] 949.774.2920
www.StudioW- Architects.com
| | 3220 EXECUTIVE RIDGE
SUITE 210 VISTA, CA 92081
TEL: (760) 560-0100 #2022- 05991
www.salasobri
en.com E-Mail admin@tsqeng
.com

ED ES TI NP

ARCHITECTEENNGGIINNEEEERR
No. C 30345 No. C Ren. 9/30/23 Ren. 30345
9/30/235
DA TE SSI GIGNEEDD:
:0019/0/50/82/0220323

4. Copyright Studio W Associates, Inc. 2022.

NO
.

REMA RKSDAT E
DAT

DSA PLAN E

CHECK DSA BACK CHECK

BIDDING CONSTRU
CTION

KEY PLAN
Δ

VISTA HERITAGE GLOBAL

ACADE MY
2609 W 5TH STREET SANTA ANA, CONDITIONAL CA 92703 USE PERMIT VISTA CHARTER SCHOOL

PHASE IV
601 N FAIRVIEW, SANTA ANA, CA
92703
PLUM
BING
SCHED
Dat ULES
e Project
05/22/ Number
2023
220
37 Application Number Drawing XX- Number XXXXX
X P0
. 2
Dra
wn
Chec
S ked
O
SO
City Council 26 – 59 1/16/2024
City Council 26 – 60 1/16/2024
CEQA Exemption 15183 – Environmental Documentation
Date: December 5, 2023
Project: Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project To: City of Santa Ana
CC: Vince Fregoso, Vista Charter Public Schools
Ingrid Canedo, Vista Charter Public Schools
From: Frances Yau, AICP, Michael Baker International
Alan Ashimine, Michael Baker International
The City of Santa Ana (City) has received a project application for the proposed Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project (project), located at 601 and 615 North Fairview Street, Santa Ana, Orange County, California (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers [APN] 405- 241-04). As documented herein, the proposed project meets the conditions for a statutory exemption pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15183 (California Public Resources Code 21083.3) to allow for a streamlined environmental review process.

1. Project Background
On April 19, 2022, the Santa Ana City Council adopted the Golden City Beyond (General Plan Update) and certified the Santa Ana General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report (GPU EIR), dated October 2021. The General Plan Update provides long-term policy direction to guide the physical development, quality of life, economic health, and sustainability of the City through 2045. The General Plan Update consists of the following 12 elements: Community, Economic Prosperity, Mobility, Public Services, Conservation, Noise, Open Space, Safety, Land Use, Historic Preservation, Housing, and Urban Design. According to the GPU EIR, the full buildout of the General Plan Update (year 2045) would result in a net increase of 96,855 person, 36,261 housing units, 5,849,220 nonresidential square footage, and 11,436 jobs as compared to existing conditions in 2019.

The GPU EIR was prepared pursuant to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines and allows analysis consistent with the high-level nature of the General Plan Update. The programmatic environmental document may be used to eliminate or reduce the scope of future environmental review for individual projects that are consistent with the General Plan Update pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 21083.3 and other streamlining provisions authorized by CEQA. Later projects implemented after the General Plan Update are examined with consideration of the GPU EIR to determine whether subsequent environmental analysis or documentation must be prepared. In addition, the CEQA Guidelines currently provide for streamlining through Section 15183, Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning, Section 15183.3, Streamlining for Infill Projects, and 15183.5, Tiering and Streamlining the Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 allows a streamlined environmental review process for projects that are consistent with the densities established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. Specifically, as set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(d), the 15183 exemption applies to projects which meet the following conditions:

Exhibit 7 - Environmental Analysis and Exemption
City Council 26 – 61 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 2
(1) The project is consistent with:
(A) A community plan adopted as part of a general plan, (B) A zoning action which zoned or designated the parcel on which the project would be located to accommodate a particular density of development, or (C) A general plan of a local agency, and
(2) An EIR was certified by the lead agency for the zoning action, the community plan, or the general plan.

Further, as set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(e), the 15183 exemption applies when all feasible mitigation measures identified in the applicable general plan are implemented by the public agency with jurisdiction to require such mitigation measures.

As demonstrated throughout this memorandum, the project would qualify for streamlining of environmental review as a project consistent with a community plan or zoning under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.

2. Project Description

2.1 Project Location
The City is located in central Orange County, generally north of the San Diego Freeway (Interstate 405 [I-405]), south of the Garden Grove Freeway (State Route 22 [SR-22]), and west of the Costa Mesa Freeway (SR-55) and Interstate 5 (I-5). The City is approximately 30 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles; refer to Exhibit 1, Regional Vicinity. Santa Ana is surrounded by the cities of Orange and Garden Grove to the north, Tustin to the east, Costa Mesa and Irvine to the south, and Fountain Valley and Westminster to the west. The generally north-south trending Santa Ana River traverses the western portion of the City.

The approximately 0.9-acre project site is located at 601 and 615 North Fairview Street within the western portion of Santa Ana; refer to Exhibit 2, Site Vicinity. Regional access to the project site is provided via SR-22 and I-5. Local access to the site is provided via North Fairview Street and West 5th Street.

2.2 Existing Conditions
The project site is located within the Fairview Business Park, a highly developed and urbanized area of Santa Ana. The Fairview Business Park is occupied by institutional uses (i.e., Vista Heritage Global Academy and Templo Calvario Church) as well as various commercial and office uses (i.e., Echo Entertainment Inc., Small Wonders Children Center, IPW Industries Inc, A-1 Automotive Core Supplier, La Perla Spice Co., Inc., and Thai Eats).

As shown on Exhibit 2, the northern portion of the site consists of one existing approximately 5,837-square foot vacant building formerly occupied by auto repair businesses and associated surface parking along North Fairview Street. The southern portion of the site consists of a surface parking lot shared between Vista Heritage Global Academy and Templo Calvario Church. Minimal landscaping is present on-site; no trees are present within the project boundaries. The site is accessible from North Fairview Street via two driveways to the west, and two alleys connecting to West 5th Street to the south and southeast.

City Council 26 – 62 1/16/2024

VISTA CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT OFFICE AND OUTDOOR SPACE PROJECT CEQA EXEMPTION 15183
Exhibit 1
Regional Vicinity NOT TO SCALE
06/2023 • JN 196390

P A C I F I C O C E A N
USMC
Camp Pendleton

SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY

RIVERSIDE
COUNTY

SAN DIEGO
COUNTY

LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
ORANGE
COUNTY
101
395
405
405
605
105
210
210
710
110
215
215
5 5
5 15
15 15
15 10
10 10
73 55
57 91 91
90 60
71 83
66 91
60 38
18 18
22 1
2 14
18 18
138
138 173
247
74 74
1 1
133
261
241
330
241
Victorville
Adelanto
Hesperia
Apple Valley
San
Bernardino
Lake
Arrowhead
Running
Springs
Riverside
Fontana
Ontario Pomona
Rancho
Cucamonga
Chino
Rialto
Corona
Norco
Lake
Elsinore
Hemet
Beaumont
Redlands
Temecula
Fallbrook
Oceanside
Murrieta
Palmdale
Lancaster
San
Fernando
Pasadena
West
Covina
Whittier
Burbank
Glendora
Los
Angeles
Torrance
Long
Beach
Newport
Beach
Huntington
Beach
San
Clemente
Dana
Point
Laguna
Beach Laguna
Niguel
Mission
Viejo
San Juan
Capistrano
Santa
Ana
Costa
Mesa
Garden
Grove
Fullerton
Yorba
Linda
Irvine
Moreno
Valley
Sun
City
Perris
Project
Site
City Council 26 – 63 1/16/2024

VISTA CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT OFFICE AND OUTDOOR SPACE PROJECT CEQA EXEMPTION 15183
Exhibit 2
Site Vicinity
Source: Google Earth Pro, June 2023

NOT TO SCALE
06/2023 • JN 196390

PROJECT SITE

N FAIRVIEW ST
W 7TH ST
City Council 26 – 64 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 5
Surrounding uses adjacent to the project site include industrial, commercial, institutional, and residential uses. An existing railroad alignment (currently under construction for electric street cars) bounds the project site to the north and northeast, Vista Heritage Global Academy and office uses are located to the south (within the Fairview Business Center), and North Fairview Street bounds the site to the west and northwest. The Romero-Cruz Academy and Santa Ana River are located further west across North Fairview Street.

2.3 General Plan Designation and Zoning
According to the General Plan Update Land Use Element Figure LU-1, Land Use Map, the project site is designated Industrial/Flex-Low (FLEX-1.5).1 The Industrial/Flex designation is intended to provide context-appropriate development in areas with existing industrial uses. This land use designation allows for clean industrial uses that do not produce significant air pollutants, noise, or other nuisances typically associated with industrial uses, including office-industrial flex spaces, small-scale clean manufacturing, research and development and multilevel corporate offices, commercial retail, artist galleries, craft maker spaces, and live-work units. Adaptive reuse of buildings to accommodate live-work units is encouraged. Standalone residential is not permitted.

According to the General Plan Update Land Use Element Table LU-3, Density and Intensity Standards, the FLEX-1.5 designation allows a maximum 1.5 floor-area-ratio (FAR) and/or 30 dwelling per acre, with a maximum building height of three stories.

Based on the City of Santa Ana Zoning Map (Zoning Map), the site is zoned Light Industrial (M1) and Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82).2 According to Ordinance No. NS-2777, permitted uses in the SD-82 District are the uses permitted in the M1 zone as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18, M1 (Light Industrial) and schools by right and churches with a conditional use permit. Further, it is noted that the operational and development standards for the permitted and conditionally permitted Light Industrial Uses within the SD-82 zone shall be consistent with the operational and development standards found in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18.

2.4 Project Characteristics
The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. Specifically, the existing 5,837- square foot building would be remodeled for use as Vista Charter Public Schools district office; refer to Exhibit 3, Conceptual Site Plan. The existing open floor plan would be redesigned to include offices and conference rooms, with the exterior enhanced with new materials and color palette. The remodeled building would have approximately 5,764 square feet of usable interior space. Approximately 10 existing administrative staff would relocate from other Vista Charter educational facilities to the proposed district office; the project would not result in any new jobs.

The project would also redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor area consisting of an approximately 2,297-square foot community garden, an approximately 7,372-square foot play field, and an approximately 4,640-square foot play yard; refer to Exhibit 3. Outdoor areas would serve administrative staff and existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy and would not increase existing school capacity. The community garden, play field, and play yard would not be for public use. 1 City of Santa Ana, Golden City Beyond, Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element, Figure LU-1, Land Use Map, April 2022. 2 City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana Zoning Map, March 4, 2021.

City Council 26 – 65 1/16/2024

VISTA CHARTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT OFFICE AND OUTDOOR SPACE PROJECT CEQA EXEMPTION 15183
Exhibit 3
Conceptual Site Plan
Source: Studio W Architects, June 2023

NOT TO SCALE
10/2023 • JN 196390
P ) SU( 8102 OT HSAA
dev rese r st hgi r A cn sn oi tu o S tfos narT 1 2 0 2 )c( P AASHTO 2018 (US)
(c) 20 21 Tra ns of t S ol uti o ns, I n c . A l r i gh ts re se rved .

P AASHTO 2018 (US)
(c) 20 21 Tra ns of t S o uti o ns, n c . A r i gh ts re se rved .

P AASHTO 2018 (US)
(c) 20 21 Tra nsof t S o
lut i o n
s, In c. Al r ight s r e se r ved .

P AASHTO 2018 (US)
(c) 2 0 2 1 Tran soft S ol uti o ns, I nc A l l ri gh ts r eser ved P AA HS OT 02 81 U( ) S
()c 02 12 arT ns fo t o S tul o i sn I , c n . l A r hgi st er es evr . d P AASHTO 2018 (US)
(c) 20 21 Tra sn of tS oluti o ns, I n c . Al r i gh t s e r se r ved .

FAIRVIEW ST

PROPOSED RENOVATION

BUILDING
(E) BUILDING
(E) BUILDING (E) BUILDING

COMMUNITY
GARDEN
1 DROP OFF
(E) FRONT PARKING LOT: 20 SPACES
(E) PARKING LOT
47'-8"
15'-0" SETBACK
SIDE PARKING LOT: 43 SPACES
PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY N52°45'31"W 342.35' (M)
N52°15'47"W 342.35' (R)
S89°36'18"E 384.19' (M)
S89°53'26"E 384.19' (R)
N28°37'37"E 233.02' (M)
233.02' (R)
FH
A1.2
5 PARCEL 4
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 3
2297 SF
(E) VISTA GLOBAL ACADEMIES
SIZE: 66,181 SF
USE: EDUCATION
HEIGHT: 25'-0"
20'-0"

PLAY YARD
4640 SF

PLAY FIELD
6035 SF
20'-0"
(N) LAND
(N) CONC
PROPOS
PROPOS
BASED ON CalGreen 2022 PART 11, TABLE

TOTAL NUMBER OF

PARKING SPACES

NUMBER O

CLEAN AIR V
0 TO 9
10 TO 25
26 TO 50
51 TO 75
76 TO 100
101 TO 150
151 TO 200
201 and over 20 perc
¹ Calculation f
number
2 The number
with EVSE) in
EV capable sp
BASED ON CBC 2022, TAB

TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES

PROVIDED IN PARKING FACILITY
1 TO 25
26 TO 50
51 TO 75
76-100
101-150
151-200
201-300
301-400
401-500
501-1000
1001 AND OVER
STANDARD PARKING PROVIDED:

CLEAN AIR VEHICLE PARKING STALLS RE

CLEAN AIR VEHICLE PARKING STALLS PR
ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED:

TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED:
(E) BOLLARDS. TYP. DROP OFF
72'-2"
20'-0"
LEG
GENERA

1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FO

BARRIER WITH VISION SCREEN AT
AREA WITH SIGNAGE EVERY 20'-0"
AREA.

2. CONTRACTOR TO BRING IN OFFICE

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ACCESS THE

FIRE LANE WILL BE AT THE CONTR

4. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR BACK TO

AREAS AT THE END OF CONSTRUC

AND ANY BROKEN SPRINKLERS, VA

5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE, RE

WORK THAT IS IMPACTED, DAMAG

CONTRACTOR WORK INCLUDING,

SIDEWALKS, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS

UTILITIES - ALL TO THE SATISFACT

6. WHERE ASPHALT OR CONCRETE I

PROVIDE EVEN AND STRAIGHT LIN

SEAL SURFACE PATCH ON BOTH S

7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EX

TRENCHING ON SITE TO AVOID EX

AND TO PREVENT HAZARDS TO PE

UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STR

INSTALLED BY ANY OTHER CONTR

FOR THE LOCATION OF UNDERGR

OR NOT SHOWN OR DETAILED AND

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIA

SUCH UNIDENTIFIED CONDITIONS

SPECIFICATIONS DO NOT INCLUDE
CONSTRUCTION SAFETY.

8. GATES IN PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL

WITH PROPER LEVER HARDWARE

9. ALL IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONST

DEVELOPER AND/OR THE DEVELO

CITY DESIGN STANDARDS AND SP

CODE, AND THE APPROVED STREE

10. ALL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (TI

IMPLEMENTED PRIOR TO THE BUIL

EXPENSE

CLEAN AIR VE
TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED:

EV CHARGING SPACES PROVIDED:

DESIGNATED CLEAN AIR PARKING PROVIDE

ACCESSIB

PARKING
5764 SF OF OFFICE / 333 SF =
TOTAL NUMBER OF SPACES REQ'D =
TOTAL NUMBER OF SPACES PROVIDED =
(E) PARKING REQUIREMENT
CLASSROOMS (38 CR x 1.5)
OFFICES (1534 SF / 333)

TOTAL PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BY
1" = 20'-0"
REF: 1 / A5.0
SITE PLAN - TURN AROUND ANALYSIS 1

PROJECT SITE
City Council 26 – 66 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 7
Ancillary improvements include landscaping, fencing along the perimeters of the proposed outdoor areas, and expansion of the existing parking lot. The front parking lot facing North Fairview Street would provide 20 parking spaces and the side parking lot adjacent to an existing railroad alignment (currently under construction for electric street cars) would provide 43 spaces.

In total, the site would provide 63 parking spaces.

Similar to existing conditions, the site is accessible from North Fairview Street via two driveways to the west, and two alleys connecting to West 5th Street to the south and southeast. Internal drive aisles would provide access to the proposed office building and outdoor areas. The student drop-off and pick-up area and internal circulation pattern would be slightly modified to accommodate the outdoor learning garden space and the outdoor play areas. Specifically, the fenced play yard would have a dual use. During drop-off and pick-up hours, the fence would be opened to allow for vehicles to use as a drop-off/pick-up turnaround area; no play yard activities would occur during these times. During school hours, the play yard fence would be closed for safety and students would be able to utilize the play yard for school activities.; refer to Exhibit 3.

2.4.1 Entitlements
To allow the use of the former automotive repair building for the proposed office use, a Zone Change would be required to modify the existing Light Industrial (M1) zoning for the site to Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) to be consistent with the majority of the Fairview Business Park.

In addition to the proposed Zone Change, the project also proposes a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to amend the operational standards of the SD-82 zoning district to allow an outdoor play area. Under current SD-82 provisions, play areas for children are limited to indoors only.

2.4.2 Project Construction
Construction of the proposed project is anticipated to take approximately eight months to complete. The construction activities would include building construction, paving, and architectural coating. Construction activities would comply with the City’s Noise Ordinance, Section 18-314(e) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Municipal Code) and occur only Monday through Saturday between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Construction equipment and materials staging would occur within the project site. During construction, vehicular access would be provided via existing access points along North Fairview Street and/or West 5th Street.

3. California Environmental Quality Act Regulatory Setting CEQA applies to proposed projects initiated by, funded by, or requiring discretionary approvals from State or local government agencies. CEQA Guidelines apply generally to discretionary actions by agencies which may have a significant effect on the environment. However, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that an activity may have a significant effect on the environment, and if the activity meets the conditions for a CEQA Exemption, it is considered exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 allows a streamlined environmental review process for projects that are consistent with the densities established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified and does not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.

Projects that are consistent with the densities and use characteristics considered by the GPU EIR may qualify for the CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 Exemption process. This exemption process may be used when a project meets the following conditions:

City Council 26 – 67 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 8
a) The project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified. b) There are no project specific effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. c) There are no project specific impacts which the prior EIR failed to analyze as significant effects.
d) There are no potentially significant off-site and/or cumulative impacts which the prior EIR failed to evaluate.
e) There is no substantial new information which results in more severe impacts than anticipated by the prior EIR.

It is the intention of the City to pursue an exemption for the proposed project. The environmental review contained in Section 4 has been prepared to assess the potential for the proposed project to result in environmental effects and whether the proposed project qualifies for an exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. The previously certified GPU EIR serves as the primary environmental compliance document for the project, and the text, standards of conditions, and applicable mitigation measures are incorporated by reference. Per the CEQA Guidelines, the exemption does not need to be circulated for public review but can be included in the staff report prior to making a decision on the project.

4. Environmental Review
This section includes an assessment, by issue area, of the proposed project’s potential effects on the environment.

4.1 Aesthetics

4.1.1 GPU EIR Findings
The GPU EIR concluded that while buildout of the General Plan Update would result in greater density and intensity in the five focus areas, aesthetic impacts would be less than significant with implementation of GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements (RR) AE-1 through AE-3. RR AE-1 requires the City to enforce adherence with the California Building Code, including provisions of the Building Energy Efficiency Standards related to lighting. RR AE-2 requires the City to enforce development standards and other general provisions as detailed in the Zoning Code (Municipal Code Chapter 41, Zoning) to ensure consistency between the General Plan and proposed development projects. Last, RR AE-3 requires the City to enforce the development standards and guidelines of adopted specific plans. The GPU EIR also states that visual resources in the City include views from public places of the Santiago Creek along the northern portion of the City and the Santa Ana River along the western portion of the City. There are no State-designated scenic highways in Santa Ana.

4.1.2 Project Analysis
The project site is located along North Fairview Street and is currently developed with one existing building formerly occupied by automobile repair businesses and associated surface parking. Due to intervening topography and ornamental vegetation, the Santa Ana River and Santiago Creek are not visible from the project site. The proposed project would renovate a former automotive repair building as the Vista Charter Public Schools district office. Although the proposed project City Council 26 – 68 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 9
would require a Zone Change to modify the site’s M1 zoning to SD-82, it would make the site’s zoning consistent with the rest of the Fairview Business Park. Additionally, no change in density or building height is proposed. Thus, the proposed project would be consistent with the allowed development density for the site’s FLEX-1.5 land use designation established by the General Plan Update and would have similar or lesser significant impacts than those analyzed in the GPU EIR.

Furthermore, development would be required to comply with existing standards governing aesthetics for the SD-82 zone, which is consistent with the standards for M1 uses in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18. Overall, the project would renovate an unused, vacant automobile repair building as a school district office and provide outdoor areas with a community garden and play areas. Thus, the project would improve the aesthetic character of the project site and complement the existing development in the Fairview Business Park. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, damage scenic resources within a State-designated scenic highway, or conflict with existing policies governing scenic quality. Moreover, to further reduce impacts associated with the proposed project, implementation of RR AE-1 would ensure compliance with the California Building Code, including provisions of the Building Energy Efficiency Standards related to lighting and adherence to applicable development standards in the Zoning Code.

Additionally, the proposed project would comply with existing outdoor lighting standards for nonresidential buildings in Municipal Code Section 8-211, Special commercial building provisions, which require lighting to be contained on-site. Proposed nighttime lighting on-site for the outdoor areas would be limited to security lighting (i.e., no field lights that could impact neighboring uses at night). Therefore, impacts related to nighttime lighting and glare would be less than significant.

4.1.3 Conclusion
As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR AE1 and AE-2 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project-specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe aesthetic impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures:

RR AE-1 The City shall enforce adherence with the California Building Code, including provisions of the Building Energy Efficiency Standards related to lighting.

RR AE-2 The City shall enforce development standards and other general provisions as detailed in the Zoning Code (Chapter 41 of the Municipal Code) to ensure consistency between the City’s General Plan and proposed development projects.

This includes compliance with the requirements of any ordinance adopting specific development plans.

4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources

4.2.1 GPU EIR Findings
Most of the City, including the project site, is urbanized, developed, and does not provide opportunities for agricultural or forestry use. As stated in the GPU EIR, the City is nearly built out and does not contain any significant agricultural resources or land designated or zoned for agricultural use.

City Council 26 – 69 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 10

4.2.2 Project Analysis
The project site is fully developed and consists of a building formerly utilized by automobile repair businesses and a surface parking area within the Fairview Business Park. The project does not involve any land use changes related to agriculture, forest land, or timberland production. The project site and surrounding area are not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, and do not include lands that qualify as forest land or timberland.3 Additionally, there are no lands in the City under a Williamson Act contract.4 Therefore, no impact to agricultural and forestry resources would occur.

4.2.3 Conclusion
Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update, and would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project-specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to agriculture and forestry resources than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply.

4.3 Air Quality

4.3.1 GPU EIR Findings
The GPU EIR determined that the General Plan Update is inconsistent with the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) because buildout under the General Plan Update would exceed the population estimates assumed for the AQMP and would cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the South Coast Air Basin (Basin). The GPU EIR included Mitigation Measure AQ-2, which would reduce criteria air pollutant emissions from operationalrelated activities to the extent feasible; however, due to the magnitude and scale of the land uses that would be developed, no mitigation measures are available that would reduce operation and construction impacts below South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds.

Therefore, the GPU EIR determined that impacts related to AQMP consistency and air quality emissions would remain significant and unavoidable.

The GPU EIR also determined that construction activities associated with buildout of the GPU could generate short-term emissions that exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds and cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the Basin. Implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1 would reduce criteria air pollutant emissions from construction-related activities to the extent feasible. However, the GPU EIR determined that construction time frames and equipment for site-specific development projects have a potential for multiple development projects to be constructed at one time, resulting in significant construction-related emissions.

Thus, impacts were determined to be significant and unavoidable. 3 California Department of Conservation, California Important Farmland Finder, https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/, accessed June 29, 2023. 4 California Department of Conservation, California Williamson Act Enrollment Finder, https://gis.conservation.ca.gov/portal/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=18f7488c0a9d4d299f5e9c33b312f312, accessed July 26, 2023.

City Council 26 – 70 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 11

4.3.2 Project Analysis
The following section evaluates the potential short- and long-term air quality impacts that would result from the construction and operation of the proposed project. The analysis is primarily based upon Attachment A, Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Modeling Results.

CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE AIR QUALITY PLAN
In order to reduce emissions in the Basin, the SCAQMD adopted the 2022 Air Quality Management Plan (2022 AQMP) which establishes a program of rules and regulations directed at reducing air pollutant emissions and achieving State and Federal air quality standards. The AQMP is a regional and multi-agency effort including the SCAQMD, California Air Resources Board (CARB), the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

The 2022 AQMP pollutant control strategies are based on the latest scientific and technical information and planning assumptions, including the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2020-2045 RTP/SCS), updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories, and SCAG’s latest growth forecasts. SCAG’s latest growth forecasts were defined in consultation with local governments and with reference to local general plans. The SCAQMD considers projects that are consistent with the AQMP, which is intended to bring the Basin into attainment for all criteria pollutants, to also have less than significant cumulative impacts.

Criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP are defined by the following indicators:

Criterion 1:

With respect to the first criterion, SCAQMD methodologies require that an air quality analysis for a project include forecasts of project emissions in relation to contributing to air quality violations and delay of attainment.
i) Would the project result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations?
Since the consistency criteria identified under the first criterion pertains to pollutant concentrations, rather than to total regional emissions, an analysis of the project’s pollutant emissions relative to localized pollutant concentrations is used as the basis for evaluating project consistency. As discussed below, localized concentrations of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOX), particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter (PM10), and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) would be less than significant during project construction and operations. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations.5 5 Because reactive organic gases (ROGs) are not a criteria pollutant, there is no ambient standard or localized threshold for ROGs. Due to the role ROG plays in ozone formation, it is classified as a precursor pollutant and only a regional emissions threshold has been established.

City Council 26 – 71 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 12
ii) Would the project cause or contribute to new air quality violations? As discussed below, the proposed project would result in emissions that are below the SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, the project would not have the potential to cause or affect a violation of the ambient air quality standards.
iii) Would the project delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP?
The proposed project would result in less than significant impacts regarding regional and localized concentrations during project construction and operations As such, the project would not delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or 2022 AQMP emissions reductions.

Criterion 2:

With respect to the second criterion for determining consistency with SCAQMD and SCAG air quality policies, it is important to recognize that air quality planning within the Basin focuses on attainment of ambient air quality standards at the earliest feasible date. Projections for achieving air quality goals are based on assumptions regarding population, housing, and growth trends.

Thus, the SCAQMD’s second criterion for determining project consistency focuses on whether the proposed project exceeds the assumptions utilized in preparing the forecasts presented in the 2022 AQMP. Determining whether a project exceeds the assumptions reflected in the 2022 AQMP involves the evaluation of the three criteria outlined below. The following discussion provides an analysis of each of these criteria.
i) Would the project be consistent with the population, housing, and employment growth projections utilized in the preparation of the AQMP?
Growth projections included in the 2022 AQMP form the basis for the projections of air pollutant emissions and are based on general plan land use designations and SCAG’s 2020-2045 RTP/SCS demographics forecasts. The population, housing, and employment forecasts within the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS are based on local general plans as well as input from local governments, such as the City. The SCAQMD has incorporated these same demographic growth forecasts for various socioeconomic categories (e.g., population, housing, employment) into the 2022 AQMP.

The project site is designated FLEX-1.5 and is zoned M1 and SD-82 zones. The FLEX1.5 designation allows for various office uses, a maximum FAR of 1.5 and a maximum building height of three stories. The proposed project would renovate an existing 5,837- square foot building as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. The building is located on a 0.9-acre (39,204 square-foot) site, thus providing an FAR of 0.15. The existing building height would remain the same at 19 feet and four inches. As such, the project would meet the design standards of the FLEX-1.5 designation.

Permitted uses in the SD-82 zone are the uses permitted in the M1 zone as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18, M1 (Light Industrial), and schools by right and churches with a conditional use permit. Further, it is noted that the operational and development standards for the permitted and conditionally permitted Light Industrial Uses within the SD-82 zone shall be consistent with the operational and development standards found in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18. To allow the use of the former automotive repair building for the proposed office use, a Zone Change would City Council 26 – 72 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 13
be required to modify the existing M1 zone to SD-82 to be consistent with the majority of the Fairview Business Park. In addition to the proposed Zone Change, the project also proposes a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to amend the operational standards of the SD82 zoning district to allow outdoor play areas. The project would also redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor area consisting of an approximately 2,297-square foot community garden, an approximately 7,372-square foot play field, and an approximately 4,640-square foot play yard. Under current SD-82 provisions, play areas for children are limited to indoors only. Upon approval of the above entitlements, the proposed project would be consistent with the requirements of the General Plan Update and project site’s zoning, and would not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Impacts would be less than significant.

The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. As discussed in Section 4.14, Population and Housing, Vista Charter Public Schools operates six public charter schools in Los Angeles and Orange County and serves a total of 1,500 students.

The proposed project creates an opportunity to have a district office located next to the organization’s largest school, Vista Heritage Global Academy. However, it is anticipated that the project would not generate new employment opportunities within the existing organization. Additionally, proposed outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy and would not increase existing school capacity.

As a result, the proposed project would not directly or indirectly result in substantial unplanned population growth in the area or displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing. Additionally, as the SCAQMD has incorporated these same projections into the 2022 AQMP, it can be concluded that the proposed project would be consistent with the projections included in the 2022 AQMP. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard.
ii) Would the project implement all feasible air quality mitigation measures? The proposed project would result in less than significant air quality impacts. Compliance with all feasible emission reduction rules and measures identified by the SCAQMD would be required as identified in RR AQ-2 and AQ-3 below. As such, the proposed project meets this 2022 AQMP consistency criterion.
iii) Would the project be consistent with the land use planning strategies set forth in the AQMP?
Land use planning strategies set forth in the 2022 AQMP are primarily based on the 2020- 2045 RTP/SCS. There is an existing bus stop located less than one mile to the west of the project site operated by Orange County Transportation Authority. Further, the project would provide bicycle parking and encourage alternate mode of transportation. Therefore, the project would be consistent with the actions and strategies of the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS As such, the proposed project meets this AQMP consistency criterion.

In conclusion, the determination of 2022 AQMP consistency is primarily concerned with the longterm influence of a project on air quality in the Basin. The proposed project would not result in a long-term impact on the region’s ability to meet State and Federal air quality standards. Further, the proposed project’s long-term influence on air quality in the Basin would also be consistent with the SCAQMD and SCAG’s goals and policies and is considered consistent with the 2022 AQMP.

City Council 26 – 73 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 14

CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS
Construction Impacts
The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy an existing building to use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools and is not expected to involve any major construction activities. The project would be constructed over approximately eight months. Earthwork would be balanced onsite and would not require soil import or export. Exhaust emission factors for typical dieselpowered heavy equipment are based on the California Emissions Estimator Model version 2022.1 (CalEEMod) program defaults. Variables factored into estimating the total construction emissions include the level of activity, length of construction period, number of pieces and types of equipment in use, site characteristics, weather conditions, number of construction personnel, and the amount of materials to be transported on- or off-site. The analysis of daily construction emissions has been prepared utilizing CalEEMod. Refer to Attachment A for the CalEEMod outputs and results. Fugitive dust emissions are associated with land clearing, ground excavation, cut-and-fill, and truck travel on unpaved roadways (including demolition as well as construction activities). Exhaust emissions from construction activities include emissions associated with the transport of machinery and supplies to and from the project site, employee commutes to the project site, emissions produced on-site as the equipment is used, and emissions from trucks transporting materials to/from the site. In addition to gaseous and particulate emissions, the application of asphalt and surface coatings creates ROG emissions, which are O3 precursors.

Table 1, Project-Generated Construction Emissions, presents the anticipated daily short-term construction emissions.

Table 1
Project-Generated Construction Emissions
Emissions Source Pollutant (pounds/day)1,2
ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Year 1 Construction Emissions2 0.59 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.32 0.27 Year 2 Construction Emissions2 0.89 5.65 7.11 0.01 0.44 0.25 Maximum Daily Emissions 0.89 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.44 0.27
SCAQMD Regional Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Notes:

1. Emissions were calculated using CalEEMod version 2022.1.

2. Modeling assumptions include compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 which requires: properly maintain mobile and other construction equipment; replace ground cover in disturbed areas quickly; water exposed surfaces three times daily; cover stockpiles with tarps; water all haul roads twice daily; and limit speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour.

Source: Refer to Attachment A for assumptions used in this analysis.

Construction Emissions Conclusion
With the implementation of RR AQ-2 and AQ-3, criteria pollutant emissions during construction of the proposed project would not exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds; refer to Table 1.

Thus, total construction related air emissions would be less than significant.

Operational Impacts
Long-term operational air quality impacts consist of mobile source emissions generated from project-related traffic and emissions from stationary area and energy sources. It should be noted that emission reductions from the existing uses are not taken into account as they are currently vacant. Area source emissions include those generated by architectural coatings, consumer City Council 26 – 74 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 15
products, and landscape maintenance equipment associated with the development of the proposed project. Energy source emissions would be generated as a result of electricity and natural gas usage associated with the proposed project. Mobile sources are emissions from motor vehicles, including tailpipe and evaporative emissions. Emissions associated with each source are detailed in Table 2, Project-Generated Operational Emissions.

Table 2
Project-Generated Operational Emissions
Emissions Source Pollutant (pounds/day)1
ROG NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Project Summer Emissions
Area 0.22 <0.01 0.30 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Energy <0.01 0.05 0.04 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Mobile 0.27 0.18 1.95 <0.01 0.41 0.11
Total Summer Emissions2 0.49 0.23 2.30 <0.01 0.41 0.11
SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Project Winter Emissions
Area 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Energy <0.01 0.05 0.04 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
Mobile 0.27 0.20 1.85 <0.01 0.41 0.11
Total Winter Emissions2 0.44 0.24 1.89 <0.01 0.41 0.11
SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Notes:

1. Emissions were calculated using CalEEMod version 2022.1 and are based on 7,000 square feet building area as a conservative analysis.

2. The numbers may be slightly off due to rounding.

Source: Refer to Attachment A for assumptions used in this analysis.

As shown in Table 2, the total operational emissions for both summer and winter would not exceed established SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, impacts in this regard would be less than significant.

Air Quality Health Impacts
Adverse health effects induced by criteria pollutant emissions are highly dependent on a multitude of interconnected variables (e.g., cumulative concentrations, local meteorology and atmospheric conditions, and the number and character of exposed individual [e.g., age, gender]). In particular, O3 precursors, VOCs, and NOX, affect air quality on a regional scale. Health effects related to O3 are therefore the product of emissions generated by numerous sources throughout a region.

Existing models have limited sensitivity to small changes in criteria pollutant concentrations, and, as such, translating project-generated criteria pollutants to specific health effects or additional days of nonattainment would produce meaningless results. In other words, the project’s less than significant increases in regional air pollution from criteria air pollutants would have nominal or negligible impacts on human health.

As noted in the Brief of Amicus Curiae by the SCAQMD (April 6, 2015) for Sierra Club vs. County of Fresno, the SCAQMD acknowledged it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible to quantify health impacts of criteria pollutants for various reasons including modeling limitations as well as where in the atmosphere air pollutants interact and form. Further, as noted in the Brief of Amicus Curiae by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) (April 13, 2015) for the Sierra Club vs. County of Fresno, SJVAPCD acknowledged that currently available modeling tools are not equipped to provide a meaningful analysis of the correlation between an individual development project’s air emissions and specific human health impacts.

City Council 26 – 75 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 16
The SCAQMD acknowledges that health effects quantification from O3, as an example, is correlated with the increases in ambient level of O3 in the air (concentration) that an individual person breathes. The SCAQMD’s Brief of Amicus Curiae for Sierra Club vs. County of Fresno states that it would take a large amount of additional emissions to cause a modeled increase in ambient O3 levels over the entire region. The SCAQMD states that based on their own modeling in the SCAQMD’s 2012 AQMP, a reduction of 432 tons (864,000 pounds) per day of NOX and a reduction of 187 tons (374,000 pounds) per day of VOCs would reduce O3 levels at highest monitored sites by only nine parts per billion. As such, the SCAQMD concludes that it is not currently possible to accurately quantify O3-related health impacts caused by NOX or VOC emissions from relatively small projects (defined as projects with regional scope) due to photochemistry and regional model limitations. Thus, as the project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for construction and operational air emissions, the project would have a less than significant impact for air quality health impacts.

LOCALIZED POLLUTANTS AND SENSITIVE RECEPTORS
Sensitive receptors are defined as facilities or land uses that include members of the population that are particularly sensitive to the effects of air pollutants, such as children, the elderly, and people with illnesses. Examples of these sensitive receptors are residences, schools, hospitals, and daycare centers. The CARB has identified the following groups of individuals as those most likely to be affected by air pollution: the elderly over 65, children under 14, athletes, and persons with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma, emphysema, and bronchitis.

The closest sensitive receptor to the project site is the Vista Heritage Global Academy School adjacent to the south of the project site. The closest residential uses are located approximately 100 feet to the north of the project site and the existing Romero-Cruz Academy school is located approximately 100 feet to the west.

Localized Significance Thresholds
Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) were developed in response to SCAQMD Governing Boards’ Environmental Justice Enhancement Initiative (I-4). The SCAQMD provided the Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (dated June 2003 [revised 2008]) for guidance.

The LST methodology assists lead agencies in analyzing localized air quality impacts. The SCAQMD provides the LST lookup tables for one-, two-, and five-acre projects emitting CO, NOX, PM2.5, and/or PM10. The LST methodology and associated mass rates are not designed to evaluate localized impacts from mobile sources traveling over the roadways. The project site is located within Source Receptor Area (SRA) 17, Central Orange County.

Construction LST
The SCAQMD guidance on applying CalEEMod to LSTs specifies the number of acres a particular piece of equipment would likely disturb per day.6 SCAQMD provides LST thresholds for one-, two, and five-acre site disturbance areas; SCAQMD does not provide LST thresholds for projects over five acres. The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools and would not involve any grading or major construction related activities and therefore, there would not be any 6 The number of acres represent the total acres traversed by grading equipment. In order to properly grade a piece of land, multiple passes with equipment may be required. The disturbance acreage is based on the equipment list and days of the grading phase according to the anticipated maximum number of acres a given piece of equipment can pass over in an 8-hour workday.

City Council 26 – 76 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 17
significant on-site localized construction emissions. As such the project’s localized construction emissions would not exceed the LSTs for SRA 17 and localized significance impacts from projectrelated construction would be less than significant.

Operational LST
According to SCAQMD LST methodology, LSTs would apply to operational activities if the project includes stationary sources or attracts mobile sources that may spend extended periods queuing and idling at the site (i.e., warehouse or transfer facilities). The proposed project does not include such uses. Thus, due to the lack of such emissions, no long-term LST analysis is needed.

Operational LST impacts would be less than significant in this regard.

Carbon Monoxide Hotspots
CO emissions are a function of vehicle idling time, meteorological conditions, and traffic flow.

Under certain extreme meteorological conditions, CO concentrations near a congested roadway or intersection may reach unhealthful levels (e.g., adversely affecting residents, school children, hospital patients, and the elderly).

The Basin is designated as an attainment/maintenance area for the Federal CO standards and an attainment area under State standards. There has been a decline in CO emissions even though vehicle miles traveled (VMT) on U.S. urban and rural roads have increased; estimated anthropogenic CO emissions have decreased 68 percent between 1990 and 2014. In 2014, mobile sources accounted for 82 percent of the nation’s total anthropogenic CO emissions.7 Three major control programs have contributed to the reduced per-vehicle CO emissions, including exhaust standards, cleaner burning fuels, and motor vehicle inspection/maintenance programs.

According to the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, a potential CO hotspot may occur at any location where the background CO concentration already exceeds 9.0 parts per million (ppm), which is the 8-hour California ambient air quality standard. The closest monitoring station to the project site that monitors CO concentration is Anaheim – 812 West Vermont Street, which is located approximately 4.5 miles north of the project site. The maximum CO concentration at Anaheim – 812 West Vermont Street station was measured at 1.976 ppm in 2022.8 Given that the background CO concentration does not currently exceed 9.0 ppm, a CO hotspot would not occur at the project site. Therefore, CO hotspot impacts would be less than significant in this regard.

Asbestos
Asbestos is a term used for several types of naturally occurring fibrous minerals that are a human health hazard when airborne. The most common type of asbestos is chrysotile, but other types such as tremolite and actinolite are also found in California. Asbestos is classified as a known human carcinogen by State, Federal, and international agencies and was identified as a toxic air contaminant by CARB in 1986.

Asbestos can be released from serpentinite and ultramafic rocks when the rock is broken or crushed. At the point of release, the asbestos fibers may become airborne, causing air quality and human health hazards. These rocks have been commonly used for unpaved gravel roads, 7 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Carbon Monoxide Emissions, https://cfpub.epa.gov/roe/indicator_pdf.cfm?i=10, accessed July 3, 2023. 8 California Air Resources Board, Air Quality and Meteorological Information, 4.3.3 https://www.arb.ca.gov/aqmis2/aqdselect.php?tab=specialrpt, accessed July 3, 2023.

City Council 26 – 77 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 18
landscaping, fill projects, and other improvement projects in some localities. Asbestos may be released to the atmosphere due to vehicular traffic on unpaved roads, during grading for development projects, and at quarry operations. All of these activities may have the effect of releasing potentially harmful asbestos into the air. Natural weathering and erosion processes can act on asbestos bearing rock and make it easier for asbestos fibers to become airborne if such rock is disturbed. According to the Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California – Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos Report, serpentinite and ultramafic rocks are not known to occur within the project area.9
It is possible that the existing on-site structure contains asbestos. According to SCAQMD Rule 1403 requirements, prior to the start of demolition activities, the existing structure shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of asbestos by a person that is certified by Cal/OSHA for asbestos surveys. Rule 1403 requires that the SCAQMD be notified a minimum of 10 days before any demolition activities begin with specific details of all asbestos to be removed, start and completion dates of demolition, work practices and engineering controls to be used to contain the asbestos emissions, estimates on the amount of asbestos to be removed, the name of the waste disposal site where the asbestos will be taken, and names and addresses of all contractors and transporters that will be involved in the asbestos removal process. Therefore, through adherence to the asbestos removal requirements, detailed in SCAQMD Rule 1403, a less than significant asbestos impact would occur during construction of the proposed project.

Health Risk Impacts of On-Site Sensitive Receptors
The project site is located adjacent to an existing railroad and light industrial uses. Therefore, the proposed on-site outdoor play area could be exposed to potential health impacts. It should be noted that according to several court decisions, CEQA analysis is not required to analyze impacts of the existing environment on a proposed project unless the project risks exacerbating existing environmental hazards. As such, the following discussion on the health risk impacts of on-site sensitive receptors is for informational purposes only.

The SCAQMD recommends that health risk assessments be conducted for substantial sources of diesel particulate emissions (e.g., truck idling and movements, ship hoteling at ports, and train idling) and has provided guidance for analyzing mobile source diesel emissions.10 Similarly, CARB requires a health risk assessment when siting new sensitive land uses within 1,000 feet of a major service and maintenance rail yard or within 1,000 feet of a distribution center that accommodates more than 100 trucks per day.11 It should be noted that emissions of diesel particulate matter from train idling occurs predominantly at railroad yards, train stations, and train stops. Most train idling emissions are concentrated at railroad yards, where switching engines and local yard service operations are performed. The proposed project is located next to a railroad and is not located in the vicinity of a railyard or a train station. The railroad is currently not operational and is being developed to build a fixed guideway system called the Orange County Streetcar (OC Streetcar). The proposed OC Streetcars would be electrically-powered and would not consume diesel and thus, would not generate diesel particulate matter. Furthermore, the light industrial uses located to the south of the project site are small warehouses that do not qualify as a distribution center, and only involve occasional delivery truck trips that are much less than 100 9 California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California – Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos Report, August 2000, https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/toxics/asbestos/ofr_2000-019.pdf, accessed April 3, 2023. 10 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Emissions, December 2002. 11 California Air Resources Board, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, April 2005.

City Council 26 – 78 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 19
truck trips per day. Therefore, diesel particulate matter emissions generated by the light industrial uses to the south are nominal and would not cause significant health impacts to on-site sensitive receptors (i.e., proposed outdoor play area).

As such, on-site sensitive receptors would have less than significant health impacts from the future operations of the OC Streetcar and the existing operations of adjacent light industrial uses, and potential health risk from the future OC Streetcar and existing light industrial uses on on-site sensitive receptors was not quantified. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard.

OBJECTIONABLE ODORS
According to the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land uses associated with odor complaints typically include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding. The proposed project does not include any uses identified by the SCAQMD as being associated with odors.

Construction activities associated with the project may generate detectable odors from heavyduty equipment exhaust and architectural coatings. However, construction-related odors would be short-term in nature and cease upon project completion. In addition, the project would be required to comply with the California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Sections 2449(d)(3) and 2485, which minimize the idling time of construction equipment either by requiring equipment to be shut off when not in use or limiting idling time to no more than five minutes. Compliance with these existing regulations would further reduce the detectable odors from heavy-duty equipment exhaust. Project’s compliance with RR AQ-3 would ensure compliance with the SCAQMD Regulation XI, Rule 1113 – Architectural Coating, which would minimize odor impacts from ROG emissions during architectural coating. Any odor impacts to existing adjacent land uses would be short-term and negligible. As such, the project would not result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard.

4.3.3 Conclusion
Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR AQ-1 though AQ-3 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project-specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe air quality impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures:

RR AQ-1 (amended) New buildings are required to achieve the current California Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6) and California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) (Title 24, Part 11). The 202219 Building Energy Efficiency Standards became effective January 1, 20220. The Building and Energy Efficiency Standards and CALGreen are updated tri-annually with a goal to achieve net zero buildings energy for 2030.

RR AQ-2 Construction activities will be conducted in compliance with California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Section 2449, which requires that nonessential idling of construction equipment is restricted to five minutes or less.

City Council 26 – 79 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 20
RR AQ-3 Construction activities will be conducted in compliance with any applicable South Coast Air Quality Management District rules and regulations, including but not limited to:
• Rule 403, Fugitive Dust, for controlling fugitive dust and avoiding nuisance. • Rule 402, Nuisance, which states that a project shall not “discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.”
• Rule 1113, which limits the volatile organic compound content of architectural coatings.
• Rule 1466, Soil Disturbance. Projects that involve earth-moving activities of more than 50 cubic yards of soil with applicable toxic air contaminants are subject to this rule.

4.4 Biological Resources

4.4.1 GPU EIR Findings
According to the GPU EIR, the City is built out with primarily industrial, commercial, and residential uses. Wildlife habitats within the City are generally limited to open space/vacant parcels, the Santa Ana River, and the Santiago Creek. While no development or land use changes are proposed in the City’s open space areas, sensitive species may still be present in Santa Ana and vegetation removal for redevelopment in the City could adversely impact special status species and/or migratory birds. Thus, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would require screening by a qualified biologist to determine if a site-specific biological resources report is required for projects that disturb vegetated land or major streams.

No land use changes are proposed on parcels identified with riparian habitat, sensitive natural communities, or wetlands. Additionally, the City is not within a Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP/HCP) area. Thus, the GPU EIR concluded that the General Plan Update would have no impact in those regards.

4.4.2 Project Analysis
The project site is located within the General Plan Update West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area, which includes 28 open space designated parcels and zero vacant parcels. The project site is urbanized and fully disturbed/developed. The proposed project would renovate a former automotive repair building as the Vista Charter Public Schools district office and redevelop existing surface parking lots into an outdoor community garden, outdoor play field, and outdoor play yard. The project site does not include any wildlife or riparian habitat, sensitive natural communities, or wildlife corridors. Although the project site contains limited ornamental vegetation, the site does not include attributes that would be capable of supporting special status or sensitive plant species, or native resident or migratory species. Additionally, project compliance with RR B-2 would ensure any potential direct or indirect impacts to common bird species comply with California Fish and Game Code Section 3503, which prohibits the take, possession, or needless destruction of any bird’s nest or eggs. Further, all proposed activities would occur within City Council 26 – 80 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 21
established urbanized areas and not include land uses or activities that would remove or impact any biological resources. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur compared to the determination in the GPU EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

As stated, the City is not within an NCCP/HCP area. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with an NCCP/HCP or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan.

4.4.3 Conclusion
Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR B-2 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project-specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe biological resource impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures:

RR B-2 Regulatory requirement for potential direct/indirect impacts to common and sensitive bird and raptor species will require compliance with the California Fish and Game Code Section 3503.

4.5 Cultural Resources

4.5.1 GPU EIR Findings
The GPU EIR concluded that future development under the General Plan Update could adversely impact the City’s numerous historical properties listed in national, State, and local registers.

However, impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels upon implementation of RR CUL-1 through CUL-6 and Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-7. Specifically, Mitigation Measure CUL-1 would require a historical resources assessment (HRA) for structures 45 years or older. Mitigation Measure CUL-2 would require the maximum use of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Historic Buildings to ensure that projects involving relocation, conversion, rehabilitation, or alteration of a historic resources would not impair any historical significance. In the event that impacts to historical resources cannot be avoided, Mitigation Measure CUL-3 would require the affected historical resources to be thoroughly documented before issuance of any permits and may also require additional public education efforts and/or memorialization of the historical resource. To reduce impacts to archaeological resources and prior to ground-disturbing activities, Mitigation Measure CUL-4 requires an Archaeological Resources Assessment be conducted under the supervision of a qualitied archaeologist. If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified and impacts cannot be avoided, Mitigation Measure CUL-5 requires a Phase II Testing and Evaluation investigation be performed by a qualified archaeologist. If the Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify archaeological resources but indicates the project area to be highly sensitive for archeological resources, a qualified archaeologist and a Native American monitor culturally affiliated with the project area must monitor all ground-disturbing activities in the areas of high archaeological sensitivity. Pursuant to Mitigation Measure CUL-7, if the Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources, a qualified archaeologist must be retained on-call. Overall, implementation of regulatory requirements and Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-7 would reduce impacts to less than significant levels.

City Council 26 – 81 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 22

4.5.2 Project Analysis
The project site is located within the western portion of the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area and does not contain any historical resources as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a). Thus, no impacts would occur with regards to historical resources.

Although the project would redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor community garden, play field, and play yard, the proposed project would not require extensive excavation that could uncover previously undiscovered archaeological resources or disturb human remains. Typical excavation depth would be a maximum of four feet for the majority of the site with the deepest excavation of approximately eight feet for an underground infiltration chamber related to stormwater improvements. RR CUL-1 requires that if human remains are discovered within the project site, disturbance of the site must halt until the County coroner has investigated and recommended treatment and disposition of the remains. If the human remains are determined to be Native American in origin, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted. Upon implementation of RR CUL-1, impacts would be less than significant in these regards. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur compared to the determinations of the GPU EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.5.3 Conclusion
As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR CUL1, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project-specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe cultural resource impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures:

RR CUL-1 California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that if human remains are discovered within the proposed project site, disturbance of the site shall halt and remain halted until the coroner has investigated the circumstances, manner, and cause of any death, and the recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the human remains have been made to the person responsible for the excavation, or to his or her authorized representative. If the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the coroner recognizes or has reason to believe the human remains to be those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission.

4.6 Energy

4.6.1 GPU EIR Findings
The GPU EIR determined that implementation of the General Plan Update policies, in conjunction with regulatory requirements, would ensure that energy demand associated with growth under the General Plan Update would not be inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary. Additionally, the General Plan Update would not conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.

City Council 26 – 82 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 23

4.6.2 Project Analysis

ENERGY CONSUMPTION
Construction
During construction, the project would consume energy in two general forms: (1) the fuel energy consumed by construction vehicles and equipment; and (2) bound energy in construction materials, such as asphalt, steel, concrete, pipes, and manufactured or processed materials such as lumber and glass.

Fossil fuels used for construction vehicles and other energy-consuming equipment would be used during building construction, paving, and architectural coatings. Fuel energy consumed during construction would be temporary and would not represent a significant demand on energy resources. In addition, some incidental energy conservation would occur during construction through compliance with State and RR E-1 requirements that heavy-duty diesel equipment not in use for more than five minutes be turned off. Project construction equipment would also be required to comply with the latest U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and CARB engine emissions standards. These emissions standards require highly efficient combustion systems that maximize fuel efficiency and reduce unnecessary fuel consumption. Due to increasing transportation costs and fuel prices, contractors and owners have a strong financial incentive to avoid wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy during construction.

Substantial reductions in energy inputs for construction materials can be achieved by selecting green building materials composed of recycled materials that require less energy to produce than non-recycled materials.12 Compliance with RR E-2 and the integration of green building materials can help reduce environmental impacts associated with the extraction, transport, processing, fabrication, installation, reuse, recycling, and disposal of these building industry source materials.13 The project-related incremental increase in the use of energy bound in construction materials such as asphalt, steel, concrete, pipes and manufactured or processed materials (e.g., lumber and gas) would not substantially increase demand for energy compared to overall local and regional demand for construction materials. The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy an existing building to use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools and is not expected to involve any major construction activities or construction of new structures. As such, the project’s fuel consumption from off-road construction equipment use would be nominal and would not significantly increase fuel use in the County. Similarly, the project’s fuel consumption from on-road construction vehicle use would be nominal and would not significantly increase fuel use in the County. As such, construction would have a nominal effect on the local and regional energy supplies. It is noted that construction fuel use is temporary and would cease upon completion of construction activities. There are no unusual project characteristics that would necessitate the use of construction equipment that would be less energy efficient than at comparable construction sites in the region or State. Therefore, by complying with RR E-1 and E2, construction fuel consumption would not be any more inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary than other similar development projects of this nature. As such, a less than significant impact would occur in this regard.
12 CalRecycle, Green Building Materials, https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/greenbuilding/materials#Material, accessed August 15, 2023.
13 Ibid.

City Council 26 – 83 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 24
Operations
Transportation Energy Demand
Pursuant to the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration is responsible for establishing additional vehicle standards and for revising existing standards. Compliance with federal fuel economy standards is not determined for each individual vehicle model. Rather, compliance is determined based on each manufacturer’s average fuel economy for the portion of their vehicles produced for sale in the United States. According to the Vista Heritage Global Academy Expansion Trip Generation Assessment prepared by Urban Crossroads and dated July 24, 2023, the proposed project would generate 84 average daily trips without taking trip reductions from the existing uses as they are currently vacant. As such, with the 84 average daily trips, the project would have a nominal increase the County’s automotive fuel consumption. The project does not propose any unusual features that would result in excessive long-term operational fuel consumption.

The key drivers of transportation-related fuel consumption are commuting for work and many personal choices on when to drive to the site for various purposes. Those factors are outside of the scope of the design of the proposed project. However, the project would provide on-site bicycle parking and promote the use of alternate mode of transportation. Additionally, an Orange County Transportation Authority bus stop is located less than 0.1 miles to the west of the project site. As such, this project would encourage and support the use of alternative modes of transportation, thus reducing petroleum fuel consumption.

Therefore, fuel consumption associated with vehicle trips generated by the project would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary in comparison to other similar developments in the region. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard.

Building Energy Demand
Compliance with RR E-3 and E-4 would ensure project’s compliance with the most current version of the 2022 Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (commonly known as Title 24), which provide minimum efficiency standards related to various building features, including appliances, water and space heating and cooling equipment, building insulation and roofing, and lighting.

Additionally, the project would exceed the 2022 Title 24 standards. Compliance with the current 2022 Title 24 standards significantly reduces energy usage. As modeled in CalEEMod and detailed in Attachment A, the project would consume 124,742 kilowatt-hour of electricity and 177,425 kilo British thermal units of natural gas per year, which is nominal compared to regional energy consumption. It should be noted that as a conservative analysis, existing uses on-site were not modeled or deducted from project energy consumption.

Furthermore, the electricity provider, SCE, is subject to California’s Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS). The RPS requires investor-owned utilities, electric service providers, and community choice aggregators to increase procurement from eligible renewable energy resources to 60 percent of total procurement by 2030, and 100 percent by 2045. Renewable energy is generally defined as energy that comes from resources which are naturally replenished within a human timescale such as sunlight, wind, tides, waves, and geothermal heat. The increase in reliance of such energy resources further ensures that new development projects will not result in the waste of the finite energy resources. Therefore, by using electricity from SCE, the project would be in compliance with RR E-5. As a result, the project would ensure energy consumption to be kept to a minimum through high efficiency lighting, energy efficient appliances, and on-site renewable energy production.

City Council 26 – 84 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 25
Therefore, the project would not cause wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of building energy during project operation, or preempt future energy development or future energy conservation. A less than significant impact would occur in this regard.

CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE ENERGY PLANS
State and regional plans for renewable energy and energy efficiency include the California Energy Commission’s Integrated Energy Policy Report (IEPR), Title 24 standards, and CALGreen standards. The project would exceed 2022 Title 24 and CALGreen standards and incorporate all applicable energy efficiency measures in compliance with RR E-1 through E-5. The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy an existing building to use as an office building for Vista Charter Public School use. The proposed project would be compliant with all applicable goals and all other all applicable goals and policies by incorporating energy-, water- and waste-efficiency building features as per Title 24 standards. The project would also install water efficient features such as low-flow fixtures and water efficient and drought tolerant irrigation system to further reduce water consumption. Compliance with Title 24 and CALGreen standards would ensure the project’s consistency with the IEPR building energy efficiency recommendations, which would ensure project conformance with the State’s energy reduction goals. Less than significant impacts would occur in this regard.

4.6.3 Conclusion
The project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR E-1 through E-5, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project-specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe energy impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures:

RR E-1 Construction activities will be conducted in compliance with California Code of Regulations Section 2485, which requires that nonessential idling of construction equipment be restricted to five minutes or less.

RR E-2 At least 65 percent of all nonhazardous construction and demolition waste from nonresidential construction associated with future development in the plan area shall be recycled and/or salvaged for reuse in line with the 2016 California Green Building Standards Code Section 5.408 (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11).

RR E-3 New buildings implemented as part of the General Plan Update are required to achieve the current California Building Energy and Efficiency Standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6) and California Green Building Standards Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 11).

RR E-4 Any appliances associated with development in the Plan Area shall meet the requirements of the 2012 Appliance Efficiency Regulations.

RR E-5 Development under the General Plan Update shall support the goals of the renewables portfolio standard, SB 350, and SB 100 to achieve a tiered increase in the use of renewable energy to 60 percent by 2030, and 100 percent by 2045.

City Council 26 – 85 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 26

4.7 Geology and Soils

4.7.1 GPU EIR Findings
The GPU EIR concluded that future development under the General Plan Update would be subject to potential seismic-related hazards including strong seismic ground shaking, seismicrelated ground failure, and landslides. Further, development associated with the General Plan Update could result in unstable geologic unit or soil conditions, including soil erosion, expansive soils, settlement and collapse, and subsidence. However, implementation of RR G-1, through G3 would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Specifically, RR G-1 and G-2 require development to comply with the most recent version of the California Building Code and Municipal Code Chapter 8, Buildings and Structures, and RR G-3 requires all buildings or structures within the City that require plumbing fixtures be connected to a public sewer per Municipal Code Section 39-51, Mandatory Connections. The GPU EIR also concluded that development under the General Plan Update could impact known and unknown paleontological resources through grading and construction activities of undeveloped areas or redevelopment that requires more intensive soil excavation than in the past. Therefore, Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO3 require monitoring based on the sensitivity level of sites for paleontological resources. Overall, the GPU EIR concluded that implementation of regulatory requirements and Mitigation Measures GEO-1 through GEO-3 would reduce geology and soil impacts to less than significant levels.

4.7.2 Project Analysis
The project site is located in a seismically active area, as is most of southern California. However, the project site is not located within a State-designated Alquist-Priolo Fault Hazard Zone. The nearest fault to the project site is the Bolsa-Fairview Fault (Newport-Inglewood Rose Canyon fault zone), located approximately 5.5 miles to the southwest. No active faults are known to cross the project site. Additionally, the site is not located in an area identified as a potential landslide hazard area by the State or City. However, the project site is located within an area susceptible to liquefaction. As described above, implementation of RR G-1 and G-2 would reduce impacts in this regard to less than significant levels. Consistent with the General Plan, compliance with existing regulations would ensure the proposed project would not result in a significant impact related to seismic hazards or liquefaction.

Construction of the proposed project would involve minimal ground-disturbing activities given the nature of the proposed improvements. As mentioned above, while construction activities may result in the potential for erosion to occur, implementation of RR G-1 and G-2 would reduce impacts in this regard to less than significant levels. Consistent with the General Plan, compliance with existing regulations including implementation of regulatory requirements would ensure the proposed project would not result in a significant impact related to erosion. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur compared to the determinations of the GPU EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

Lateral spreading is a type of liquefaction-induced ground failure on mildly sloping ground.

However, the project site is located on relatively level ground, and implementation of the proposed project would not increase the risk of landslides. Therefore, no impacts related to lateral spreading would occur. Subsidence is the lowering of surface elevation due to changes occurring underground, such as the extraction of large amounts of groundwater. The proposed project would not involve the extraction of any groundwater, oil, or gas from the project site. Clay-based soils are typically susceptible to expansion. The geologic materials under the project site have very low expansive potential (plasticity index value less than 15) and are classified as nonCity Council 26 – 86 1/16/2024 Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 27
expansive in accordance with the 2022 California Building Code, Section 1803.5.3.14,15 As such, no impacts related to unstable or expansive soils would occur.

In compliance with RR G-3, construction and operation of the proposed project would not involve the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. As such, compliance with existing regulatory requirements would ensure no impact related to the use of such systems would occur.

With regards to paleontological resources, the project site is disturbed and built out in nature; however, sediments in the project site are considered to have paleontological sensitivity increasing with depth. Specifically, the project site is underlain by silty sand of alluvial fan deposits (Qyfsa) which contain “low-to-high” paleontological sensitivity; refer to GPU EIR Figure 5.6-3, Paleontological Sensitivity. As such, in the event of paleontological resource discovery, the proposed project would comply with GPU EIR Mitigation Measure GEO-3, which requires construction work to halt within a 50-foot radius of a find. With adherence to the City’s existing requirements for paleontological resources, less than significant impacts related to paleontological resources would occur.

4.7.3 Conclusion
Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR G-1 and G-2 and Mitigation Measure GEO-3 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no projectspecific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to geology and soils than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures:

RR G-1 Every public agency enforcing building regulations must adopt the provisions of the California Building Code (CBC), which is Title 24, Part 2 of the California Code of Regulations. The most recent version is the 2019 CBC (effective January 1, 2020). The CBC is updated every three years and provides minimum standards to protect property and public safety by regulating the design and construction of excavations, foundations, building frames, retaining walls, and other building elements to mitigate the effects of seismic shaking and adverse soil conditions.

The CBC also contains provisions for earthquake safety based on factors including occupancy type, the types of soil and rock on-site, and the strength of ground shaking with specified probability of occurring at a site.

RR G-2 Santa Ana Municipal Code, Chapter 8, Buildings and Structures. These codes address grading standards, excavation, and fills. This also includes compliance with regulations for unreinforced masonry structures in accordance with “Unreinforced Masonry Law,” found in California Government Code §§ 8875 et seq. The City of Santa Ana Building Official may place additional requirements upon the construction of infrastructure, buildings, and other improvements based on the findings from plan check, soils testing, and geotechnical investigations. 14 International Code Council, 2022 California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/CABC2022P1/chapter-18-soils-and-foundations, accessed July 26, 2023. 15 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey, https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx, accessed July 26, 2023.

City Council 26 – 87 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 28
RR G-3 Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 39-51 requires that all buildings or structures within the city that require plumbing fixtures must be connected to a public sewer.

GEO-3 All Projects. In the event of any fossil discovery, regardless of depth or geologic formation, construction work shall halt within a 50-foot radius of the find until its significance can be determined by a qualified paleontologist. Significant fossils shall be recovered, prepared to the point of curation, identified by qualified experts, listed in a database to facilitate analysis, and deposited in a designated paleontological curation facility in accordance with the standards of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (2010). The most likely repository is the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. The repository shall be identified and a curatorial arrangement shall be signed prior to collection of the fossils.

4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions

4.8.1 GPU EIR Findings
The GPU EIR determined that implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would ensure that the City is tracking and monitoring the City’s GHG emissions to chart a trajectory to achieve the long-term, year 2050, GHG reduction goal set by Executive Order S-03-05. However, at this time, there is no plan past 2030 that achieves the long-term GHG reduction goal established under Executive Order S-03-05. As identified by the California Council on Science and Technology, the State cannot meet the 2050 goal without major advancements in technology. Advancements in technology in the future could provide additional reductions and allow the State and City to meet the 2050 goal, but in the meantime, the GPU EIR determined that buildout of the General Plan Update would result in significant and unavoidable GHG impacts. However, the GPU EIR determined that the General Plan Update would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions.

4.8.2 Project Analysis
The following section evaluates the potential GHG impacts that would result from implementation of the proposed project. This analysis is primarily based upon Attachment A, Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas/Energy Modeling Results.

THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Amendments to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4 were adopted to assist lead agencies in determining the significance of the impacts of GHG emissions and gives lead agencies the discretion to determine whether to assess those emissions quantitatively or qualitatively. This section recommends certain factors to be considered in the determination of significance (i.e., the extent to which a project may increase or reduce GHG emissions compared to the existing environment; whether the project exceeds an applicable significance threshold; and the extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement a plan for the reduction or mitigation of GHGs). The amendments do not establish a threshold of significance; rather, lead agencies are granted discretion to establish significance thresholds for their respective jurisdictions, including looking to thresholds developed by other public agencies or suggested by other experts, such as the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), so long as any threshold chosen is supported by substantial evidence (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(c)). The California Natural Resources Agency has also clarified that the CEQA Guidelines amendments focus on the effects of GHG emissions as cumulative impacts, and therefore GHG emissions should be analyzed in the context of CEQA’s City Council 26 – 88 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 29
requirements for cumulative impact analyses (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(h)(3)).16,17 A project’s incremental contribution to a cumulative impact can be found not cumulatively considerable if the project would comply with an approved plan or mitigation program that provides specific requirements to avoid or substantially lessen the cumulative problem within the geographic area of the project.18
The GPU EIR describes that if project emissions are below the 3,000 MTCO2e bright-line screening threshold, GHG emissions impacts would be considered less than significant. As such, the analysis utilizes the 3,000 MTCO2e per year numerical threshold of significance for GHG emissions and the methodology for evaluating the project’s impacts related to GHG emissions also focuses on its consistency with Statewide, regional, and local plans adopted for the purpose of reducing and/or mitigating GHG emissions.

PROJECT-RELATED GHG EMISSIONS
Project-related GHG emissions include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Direct projectrelated GHG emissions include emissions from construction activities, area sources, mobile sources, and refrigerants, while indirect sources include emissions from energy consumption, water demand, and solid waste generation. The CalEEMod, version 2022.1 was used to calculate project-related GHG emissions. Table 3, Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions, presents the estimated CO2, N2O, and CH4 emissions associated with the proposed project; refer to Attachment A for the CalEEMod outputs.
16 California Natural Resources Agency, Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action, pp. 11-13, 14, 16, December 2009, https://resources.ca.gov/CNRALegacyFiles/ceqa/docs/Final_Statement_of_Reasons.pdf, accessed July 13, 2023. 17 State of California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, Transmittal of the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research’s Proposed SB97 CEQA Guidelines Amendments to the Natural Resources Agency, April 13, 2009, https://planning.lacity.org/eir/CrossroadsHwd/deir/files/references/C01.pdf, accessed July 13, 2023. 18 14 CCR Section 15064(h)(3).

City Council 26 – 89 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 30
Table 3
Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Source
CO2 CH4 N2O Refrigerants CO2e
Metric Tons/year1
Direct Emissions
Construction (amortized over 30 years) 2.57 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 2.58 Area Source 0.14 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.14
Mobile Source 55.10 <0.01 <0.01 0.01 56.00
Refrigerants 0.00 0.00 0.00 <0.01 <0.01
Total Direct Emissions2 57.81 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 58.72
Indirect Emissions
Energy 39.50 <0.01 <0.01 0.00 39.70
Solid Waste 0.58 0.06 0.00 0.00 2.03
Water Demand 2.48 0.04 <0.01 0.00 3.78
Total Indirect Emissions2 42.56 0.10 <0.01 0.00 45.51
Total Project-Related Emissions2 104.23
GPU EIR GHG Significance Thresholds 3,000 MTCO2e
Exceeds Thresholds? No
Notes:

1. Emissions calculated using California Emissions Estimator Model Version 2022.1 (CalEEMod) computer model and are based on 7,000 square feet building area as a conservative analysis.

2. Totals may be slightly off due to rounding.

Refer to Attachment A, for detailed model input/output data.

Direct Project-Related Sources of Greenhouse Gases
Construction Emissions. Construction GHG emissions are typically summed and amortized over the lifetime of the project (assumed to be 30 years), then added to the operational emissions.19 The project would comply with RR GHG-1 which restricts non-essential idling of construction equipment and RR GHG-7 which ensures recycling and/or salvaging for reuse at minimum of 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste generated during construction.

As shown in Table 3, the proposed project would result in 2.58 MTCO2e per year construction emissions when amortized over 30 years (or a total of 77.3 MTCO2e in 30 years).

Area Source. Area source emissions were calculated using CalEEMod and project-specific land use data. Project-related area sources include natural gas consumption for space heating and exhaust emissions from landscape maintenance equipment, such as lawnmowers, shedders/grinders, blowers, trimmers, chain saws, and hedge trimmers used to maintain the landscaping of the site. The project would directly result in 0.14 MTCO2e per year from area source emissions; refer to Table 3.

Mobile Source. CalEEMod relies upon trip generation rates from the Vista Heritage Global Academy Expansion Trip Generation Assessment prepared by Urban Crossroads and dated July 24, 2023. The proposed project would generate 84 average daily trips without taking trip reduction from the existing uses on-site as they are currently vacant. The project would result in 19 The project lifetime is based on the standard 30-year assumption of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast Air Quality Management District, Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold, October 2008).

City Council 26 – 90 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 31
approximately 56.00 MTCO2e per year of mobile source generated GHG emissions; refer to Table

3. Refrigerants. Refrigerants are substances used in equipment for air conditioning and refrigeration.

Most of the refrigerants used today are HFCs or blends thereof, which can have high GWP values.

All equipment that uses refrigerants has a charge size (i.e., quantity of refrigerant the equipment contains), and an operational refrigerant leak rate, and each refrigerant has a GWP that is specific to that refrigerant. CalEEMod quantifies refrigerant emissions from leaks during regular operation and routine servicing over the equipment lifetime, and then derives average annual emissions from the lifetime estimate. The proposed project would result in less than 0.01 MTCO2e per year of GHG emissions from refrigerants; refer to Table 3.

Indirect Project-Related Sources of Greenhouse Gases
Energy Consumption. Energy consumption emissions were calculated using CalEEMod and project-specific land use data. Southern California Edison (SCE) would provide electricity to the project site. Compliance with RR GHG-1 would ensure project’s consistency with 2022 Title 24 standards. The project would also exceed 2022 Title 24 standards, which has been not incorporated in CalEEMod as a conservative analysis. The project would indirectly result in 39.70 MTCO2e per year due to energy consumption; refer to Table 3.

Solid Waste. Solid waste associated with operations of the proposed project would result in 2.03 MTCO2e per year; refer to Table 3.

Water Demand. The project would comply with RR GHG-3 which ensures adherence to current CALGreen standards that requires increased water efficiency and reduce urban per capita water demand. The project operations would result in a demand of approximately 6.57 million gallons of water per year. Emissions from indirect energy impacts due to water supply would result in 3.78 MTCO2e per year; refer to Table 3.

Total Project-Related Sources of Greenhouse Gases
As shown in Table 3, the total amount of project-related GHG emissions from direct and indirect sources combined would total 104.23 MTCO2e per year. As such, the project would not exceed the 3,000 MTCO2e bright-line screening threshold and no new impacts would occur.

CONSISTENCY WITH APPLICABLE GHG PLANS, POLICIES, OR REGULATIONS The GHG plan consistency analysis for the project is based on the project’s consistency with the CARB 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality (2022 Scoping Plan), and the City’s General Plan Update. The 2022 Scoping Plan describes the approach the State will take to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045. The General Plan Update contains goals, policies, and measures that would reduce GHG emissions within the City.

Consistency with the 2022 CARB Scoping Plan
The 2022 Scoping Plan identifies reduction measures necessary to achieve the goal of carbon neutrality by 2045 or earlier. Actions that reduce GHG emissions are identified for each Assembly Bill (AB) 32 inventory sector. Provided in Table 4, Consistency with the 2022 Scoping Plan: AB 32 GHG Inventory Sectors, is an evaluation of applicable reduction actions/strategies by emissions source category to determine how the project would be consistent with or exceed reduction actions/strategies outlined in the 2022 Scoping Plan.

City Council 26 – 91 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 32
Table 4
Consistency with the 2022 Scoping Plan: AB 32 GHG Inventory Sectors Actions and Strategies Project Consistency Analysis
Smart Growth / Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT)
Reduce VMT per capita to 25% below
2019 levels by 2030, and 30% below
2019 levels by 2045
Consistent. The project would require installation of bicycle parking in accordance with the 2022 Title 24 standards and CALGreen Code, which would promote alternative mode of transportation to reduce VMT. Additionally, the project would be located near an existing Orange County Transportation Authority transit stop. As such, the project would be consistent with this action.

New Residential and Commercial Buildings
All electric appliances beginning 2026
(residential) and 2029 (commercial),
contributing to 6 million heat pumps
installed statewide by 2030
Consistent. The project is expected to consist of natural gas heating and/or cooking on-site. The City has not adopted an ordinance or program limiting the use of natural gas for on-site cooking and/or heating. However, if adopted, the project would comply with the applicable goals or policies limiting the use of natural gas equipment in the future. Furthermore, the project would install high efficiency lighting and appliances. As such, the project would be consistent with this action.

Construction Equipment
Achieve 25% of energy demand
electrified by 2030 and 75% electrified by
2045
Consistent. The City has not adopted an ordinance or program requiring electricity-powered construction equipment. However, if adopted, the project would be required to comply with the applicable goals or policies requiring the use of electric construction equipment in the future. As such, the project would be consistent with this action.

Non-combustion Methane Emissions
Divert 75% of organic waste from landfills
by 2025
Consistent. Senate Bill (SB) 1383 establishes targets to achieve a 50 percent reduction in the level of the Statewide disposal of organic waste from the 2014 level by 2020 and a 75 percent reduction by 2025. The law establishes an additional target that not less than 20 percent of currently disposed edible food is recovered for human consumption by 2025. The project would comply with local and regional regulations and recycle or compost 75 percent of waste by 2025 pursuant to SB 1383. As such, the project would be consistent with this action.

Source: California Air Resources Board, 2022 Scoping Plan, November 16, 2022.

Consistency with the General Plan Update
As previously stated, the project proposes to remodel and reoccupy an existing building to use as an office building. As an infill redevelopment project, the proposed project would require and produce less water, waste, and air quality pollutants compared to a new development.

Furthermore, the project would be compliant with General Plan Update Policy 4.1, Policy 4.2, Policy 4.3, Policy 4.4, and Policy 4.5 which incorporate energy-, water- and waste-efficiency building features as per Title 24 standards. The project would also be consistent with General Plan Update Policy 3.11, Policy 1.6, Policy 1.8, and Policy 1.12 by providing bicycle parking spaces on-site and due to the close proximity to the nearby transit station, which would promote alternative modes of transportation. As such, by complying with the City’s CAP and Title 24 standards, the project would also be consistent with the applicable GHG goals and policies in the General Plan Update.

Consistency Conclusion
In summary, the project’s characteristics render it consistent with Statewide, regional, and local climate change mandates, plans, policies, and recommendations. More specifically, the GHG plan consistency analysis provided above demonstrates that the project complies with the regulations and GHG reduction goals, policies, actions, and strategies outlined in the 2022 Scoping Plan, and City Council 26 – 92 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 33
General Plan Update. Consistency with these plans would reduce the impact of the project’s incremental contribution of GHG emissions. Accordingly, the project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, regulation, or recommendation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant.

4.8.3 Conclusion
Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR GHG1, GHG-2, GHG-3, and GHG -7, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project-specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe GHG impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures:

RR GHG-1 New buildings are required to achieve the current California Building Energy and Efficiency Standards (Title 24, Part 6) and California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) (Title 24, Part 11). The 2019 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards were effective on January 1, 2020. The Building Energy and Efficiency Standards and CALGreen are updated tri-annually.

RR GHG-2 Construction activities are required to adhere to California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Section 2499, which restricts nonessential idling of construction equipment to five minutes or less.

RR GHG-3 New buildings are required to adhere to the California Green Building Standards Code and Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance requirements to increase water efficiency and reduce urban per capita water demand.

RR GHG-7 California’s Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) requires the recycling and/or salvaging for reuse at minimum of 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste generated during most “new construction” projects (CALGreen §§ 4.408 and 5.408). Construction contractors are required to submit a construction waste management plan that identifies the construction and demolition waste materials to be diverted from disposal by recycling, reuse on the project, or salvaged for future use or sale and the amount (by weight or volume).

4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials

4.9.1 GPU EIR Findings
The GPU EIR concluded that buildout of the proposed General Plan Update would include construction activities and operations that would transport, use, or dispose of hazardous materials in proximity to environmental justice (EJ) communities (i.e., disadvantaged communities). Such activity could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment given the proximity of hazardous materials sites which are considered open cases, existing lead-contaminated soils, existing buildings containing asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and/or lead-based paint (LBP), and existing and planned industrial uses throughout the City. Further, there are parts of the City that are within the vicinity of the John Wayne Airport Compatibility Land Use Plan. However, the existing federal, State, and regional regulatory framework regarding hazardous materials is substantial and would apply to all future construction and operation of uses within the City.

Further, the GPU EIR included regulatory requirements that are specific to existing hazards and City Council 26 – 93 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 34
hazardous materials conditions in the City. Compliance with all applicable regulations would be required of future development in the City and would reduce the proposed General Plan Update’s impacts related to hazards or hazardous materials to a less than significant level.

According to GPU EIR Figure 2-1, EJ Communities, Neighborhoods, and Focus Areas, the project site is located within an EJ community. However, the proposed project would neither develop any new industrial uses, nor be located on or adjacent to a site listed under Table 5.8-5, Existing Hazardous Materials Sites, of the GPU EIR. Construction activities would use limited amounts of hazardous materials in the form of paints, solvents, glues, roofing materials, and other common construction materials for the proposed building remodel and outdoor play area. Construction activities may include the use of machinery and other equipment that require fueling or maintenance/servicing. These types of materials are not acutely hazardous, and all storage, handling, use, transport, and disposal of these would be required to conform to existing laws and regulations of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA), and Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) Environmental Health Division, which would ensure that all potentially hazardous materials are used and handled in an appropriate manner and would minimize the potential for safety impacts to occur. Additionally, the storage, handling, use, transport, and disposal of these hazardous materials would cease once construction is complete. Project compliance with RR HAZ-1 would ensure hazardous materials and hazardous wastes are transported in compliance with any applicable State and federal requirements; RR HAZ-2 would ensure hazardous waste generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal would be conducted in compliance with Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 263); RR HAZ-4 would ensure demolition activities that could expose works or the public to ACMs or LBPs would be conducted in accordance with any applicable State and federal requirements, and RR HAZ-5 would ensure removal of hazardous materials be conducted as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.120 and 8 CCR 5192. Therefore, with adherence to existing regulations, impacts related to the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials and accidental release of hazardous materials would be less than significant.

4.9.2 Project Analysis
Vista Heritage Global Academy is adjacent to the south of the project site. As stated above, the proposed project would comply with existing regulations to minimize the risks associated with the exposure of sensitive receptors, including the existing school, to hazardous materials to a less than significant level. The types of uses that would emit or release hazardous or acutely hazardous materials into the environment are typically industrial manufacturing facilities, which is not proposed within the project site. The project would renovate an unused, vacant automobile repair building with a school district office and provide outdoor areas for existing students at the Vista Heritage Global Academy. Although the project site is located within 0.25-mile of an existing school, hazardous materials are not typically associated with the proposed institutional (i.e., district office) or recreational (i.e., play yard and play field) uses. Anticipated hazardous materials use during project operations may include minor cleaning products and the occasional use of pesticides and herbicides for landscape maintenance. Further, while the site is located adjacent to an existing railroad alignment, it is currently under construction for future electric street cars.

Compliance with applicable laws and regulations regarding the handling and transport of hazardous materials, including RR HAZ-1, HAZ-2, HAZ-4, and HAZ-5 would ensure impacts would be less than significant.

The project site is not listed in the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker system which includes leaking underground fuel tank sites and spills, leaks, investigations, and City Council 26 – 94 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 35
cleanups sites; or the DTSC EnviroStor Data Management System which includes Cortese sites; or the U.S. EPA’s database of regulated facilities.20 As such, impacts related to hazardous materials sites would be less than significant.

The John Wayne Airport is adjacent to the City’s southeast boundary. The project site is approximately five miles northwest of the John Wayne Airport. The John Wayne Airport Compatibility Land Use Plan regulates land use development within the vicinity of the airport.

According to Figure 5.8-5, John Wayne Airport Safety Compatibility Zones, and Figure 5.8-6, Height Restrictions per Federal Air Regulations Part 77, of the GPU EIR, the project site is located outside of the John Wayne Airport’s safety compatibility zone and height restriction areas. As such, the proposed project would not result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing and working in the project area. Impacts would be less than significant.

Construction equipment and materials staging would occur within the project site. During construction, vehicular access would be provided via existing access points along North Fairview Street and West 5th Street. Operation of the proposed project would not result in population growth or changes to the existing circulation system. All driveways would be 20 feet in width; the modified student drop-off and pick-up area would have a 20-foot turn radius and 72-foot-wide turnaround, providing a more immediate point of access to the proposed development from West 5th Street and adequate space for emergency vehicle access. As such, the proposed project would not interfere with operations of the City’s Emergency Operations Center and would not interfere with operations of emergency response agencies or with coordination and cooperation between such agencies; thus, impacts to emergency response planning would be less than significant.

The City of Santa Ana is not in a designated fire hazard zone. As such, no impact related to the risk of wildland fires would occur.

4.9.3 Conclusion
Overall, the project is consistent with buildout of the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR HAZ-1, HAZ-2, HAZ-4, and HAZ-5 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to hazards and hazardous materials than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures:

RR HAZ-1 Hazardous materials and hazardous wastes will be transported to and/or from projects developed under the General Plan Update in compliance with any applicable state and federal requirements, including the U.S. Department of Transportation regulations listed in the Code of Federal Regulations (Title 49, Hazardous Materials Transportation Act); California Department of Transportation standards; and the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards.

RR HAZ-2 Hazardous waste generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal will be conducted in compliance with Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and 20 California Environmental Protection Agency, Cortese Listing, https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/, accessed July 6, 2023.

City Council 26 – 95 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 36
Recovery Act (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 263), including the management of nonhazardous solid wastes and underground tanks storing petroleum and other hazardous substances. The projects developed under the General Plan Update will be designed and constructed in accordance with the regulations of the Orange County Health Care Agency, Environmental Health Division, which serves as the designated Certified Unified Program Agency.

RR HAZ-4 Demolition activities that have the potential to expose construction workers and/or the public to asbestos-containing materials or lead-based paint will be conducted in accordance with applicable regulations, including, but not limited to:
• South Coast Air Quality Management District’s Rule 1403 • California Health and Safety Code (Section 39650 et seq.) • California Code of Regulations (Title 8, Section 1529) • California Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations (California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1529 [Asbestos] and Section 1532.1 [Lead])
• Code of Federal Regulations (Title 40, Part 61 [asbestos], Title 40, Part 763 [asbestos], and Title 29, Part 1926 [asbestos and lead]).

RR HAZ-5 The removal of hazardous materials, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), mercury-containing light ballast, and mold, will be completed in accordance with applicable regulations pursuant to 40 CFR 761 (PCBs), 40 CFR 273 (mercurycontaining light ballast), and 29 CFR 1926 (molds) by workers with the hazardous waste operations and emergency response (HAZWOPER) training, as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.120 and 8 CCR 5192.

4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality

4.10.1 GPU EIR Findings
The GPU EIR concluded that compliance with local, State, and federal regulations and the policies of the proposed General Plan Update would reduce buildout impacts related to groundwater, drainage, hydrology, and water quality. Individual projects would be required to incorporate project-specific source control and treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs), incorporate low impact design (LID)/site design, and comply with applicable regulatory requirements to ensure compliance with regulations governing water quality (e.g., the City’s Local Implementation Plan [LIP], Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System [NPDES] Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System [MS4] Permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RR HYD-4), and the City’s Model Water Quality Management Plan [WQMP]).

4.10.2 Project Analysis
Construction activities have the potential to degrade water quality through the exposure of surface runoff to exposed soils, dust, and other debris at the project site as well as increase erosion and/or siltation. As the project would develop a 0.9-acre site, the project would not be required to obtain coverage under the NPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). However, project compliance City Council 26 – 96 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 37
with RR HYD-5 would ensure adherence to Municipal Code Chapter 18 Article IV regarding prohibitions on illicit connections and discharges, urban runoff control measures, and permit requirements. As a result, water quality impacts associated with construction activities would be less than significant.

As the project would introduce new uses (i.e., office and outdoor areas) to the project site, development of a WQMP consistent with the prevailing terms and conditions of the City’s LIP, Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan and NPDES MS4 Permit from the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, i.e., RR HYD-4, and the City’s Model WQMP would be required. The WQMP would include LID/site design and project-specific BMPs to ensure water quality standards or waste discharge requirements are not violated, and to prevent substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite. Further, existing drainage facilities within the public right-of-way (i.e., West 5th Street and North Fairview Street) would be maintained. Therefore, with compliance to existing regulations to control construction stormwater runoff during operation, impacts related to water quality standards, waste discharge requirements, and storm water drainage would be less than significant, consistent with the General Plan Update.

Given the proposed uses, the project would not result in substantial population growth within Santa Ana. According to the GPU EIR, projected water demand from the proposed General Plan Update at buildout, including development of the proposed project, is well within the projected total water demand for 2040 in the City of Santa Ana 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for normal, dry year, and multiple dry year scenarios. Additionally, because the project site was formerly occupied by automotive repair businesses and associated parking area, development of the proposed project would not interfere with groundwater recharge. Therefore, consistent with the General Plan Update, the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts related to groundwater.

The GPU EIR determined that sites within the West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area that would be updated from single-family to multi-family residential use would become areas with increased impervious surfaces, and as a consequence, areas of increased stormwater runoff peak flows compared to pre-project conditions. The proposed project would renovate an existing building, formerly occupied by automobile repair businesses, into an office building; no change in density is proposed and the building footprint would not change from existing conditions. Additionally, the project proposes new landscaped areas, including a community garden, play field, and play yard, where paved surface parking currently exists. As such, the project would reduce the amount of impervious areas on the project site compared to existing conditions.

According to Figure 5.9-4, City of Santa Ana Flood Zones, of the GPU EIR, the project site is not within a 100-year flood hazard area as designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). According to Figure 5.9-5, Dam Inundation Areas, of the GPU EIR, the project site is within both the Santiago Creek Dam and Prado Dam inundation areas. However, the Santiago Creek Dam has been assessed by the California Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD) to have no existing or potential dam safety deficiencies and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Dam Safety Program is actively implementing risk-reduction measures to remediate the Prado Dam, including routine inspections and ongoing monitoring, spillway modifications to improve downstream flow, and public outreach, to ensure potential inundation hazards are minimized or eliminated.21 The GPU EIR determined that seiche occurrence is lower within inundation zones, 21 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Corps reclassifies Prado Damn, implements risk-reduction measures, https://www.spl.usace.army.mil/Media/News-Releases/Article/1849301/corps-reclassifies-prado-dam-implementsrisk-reduction-measures/, May 15, 2019.

City Council 26 – 97 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 38
and that the City is too far inland to be at risk of a tsunamis. As such, implementation of the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts in this regard.

4.10.3 Conclusion
Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RRs HYD4 and HYD-5 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to hydrology and water quality than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures:

RR HYD-4 All development pursuant to the General Plan Update shall comply with the requirements of the Orange County MS4 Permit (Order R8-2009-0030, NPDES No. CAS618030, as amended by Order No. R8-2010 0062). The MS4 Permit requires new development and redevelopment projects to:
• Control contaminants into storm drain systems
• Educate the public about stormwater impacts
• Detect and eliminate illicit discharges
• Control runoff from construction sites
• Implement best management practices and site-specific runoff controls and treatments for new development and redevelopment.

RR HYD-5 All development pursuant to the General Plan Update shall comply with the requirements detailed in Chapter 18 Article IV of the Santa Ana Municipal Code.

4.11 Land Use and Planning

4.11.1 GPU EIR Findings
The GPU EIR concluded that the General Plan Update’s policies would encourage the preservation or enhancement of the existing residential communities through infill development, open space opportunities, and development of compatible uses that would enhance the existing character of the City. A primary goal of the General Plan Update is to preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts; specific policies would reduce the conflict between contrasting land uses and enhance neighborhoods by responsibly integrating new development into existing communities. None of the changes in the General Plan Update would affect plans, policies, or regulations of other agencies that have jurisdiction within the City, including the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for the John Wayne Airport, the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Congestion Management Plan, and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). As individual projects are considered by the City, each would be subject to a variety of federal, State, and locally adopted plans designed to mitigate environmental impacts or to preserve important resources. As such, impacts associated with the General Plan Update with regards to land use and planning would be less than significant.

City Council 26 – 98 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 39

4.11.2 Project Analysis
The proposed project would remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. The project would also redevelop the shared surface parking lot into an outdoor area consisting of a community garden, a play field, and a play yard for administrative staff and existing students associated with the adjacent school; the outdoor areas would not be open to the public. Ancillary improvements include landscaping fencing along the perimeters of the proposed outdoor areas, and expansion of the existing parking lot. Similar to existing conditions, the site would remain accessible from North Fairview Street via two driveways to the west, and two alleys connecting to West 5th Street to the south and southeast. The student drop-off and pick-up area and internal site circulation would be slightly modified to accommodate the outdoor learning garden space and the outdoor play areas. The project site is not within a residential community; it is surrounded by industrial uses, with nearby residential uses separated by an existing railroad alignment. As such, development of the proposed project would not divide any established surrounding residential community.

The project is subject to the policies and/or regulations of the General Plan Update and Municipal Code at the local level. As previously stated, the project site has a land use designation of Industrial/Flex-Low (FLEX-1.5) and is within the Light Industrial (M1) and Specific Development No. 82 (SD-82) zones. The FLEX-1.5 designation allows for various office uses, a maximum FAR of 1.5 and a maximum building height of three stories. The proposed project would renovate an existing 5,837-square foot building as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. The building is located on a 0.9-acre (39,204 square-foot) site, thus providing an FAR of 0.15. The existing building height would remain the same at 19 feet and four inches. As such, the project would meet the design standards of the FLEX-1.5 designation.

Further, as detailed in Table 5, General Plan Update Land Use Element Project Consistency Analysis, the proposed project would be consistent with the applicable General Plan Update Land Use Element goals and policies.

Table 5
General Plan Update Land Use Element Project Consistency Analysis Applicable General Plan Land Use Policies Project Consistency Analysis Goal LU-1: Provide a land use plan that improves quality of life and respects our existing community.

Policy LU-1.1: Foster compatibility between land uses to enhance livability and promote healthy lifestyles.

Consistent. Industrial, commercial, institutional, and residential uses surround the project site, including Vista Heritage Global Academy and Templo Calvario Church, which both share parking with the project site, and office uses to the south and the Romero-Cruz Academy to the west. The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for use as Vista Charter Public Schools district office. The project would also redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor area consisting of a community garden, a play field, and a play yard. Outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy. Overall, the redevelopment of the project site would be compatible with the adjoining institutional uses.

City Council 26 – 99 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 40
Table 5 [cont’d]
General Plan Update Land Use Element Project Consistency Analysis Applicable General Plan Land Use Policies Project Consistency Analysis Policy LU-1.3: Promote the creation of new open space
and community-serving amenities in park-deficient
areas that keeps pace with the increase in multi-unit
housing development, with priority given to those that
are also within environmental justice area boundaries.

Consistent. According to the GPU EIR, the project site is located within an EJ community. The project would redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor area consisting of an approximately 2,297-square-foot community garden, an approximately 7,372-square-foot play field, and an approximately 4,640-square-foot play yard. The outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy.

Policy LU-1.8: Ensure that new development projects
provide a net community benefit.

Consistent. Refer to responses to Policies LU-1.1 and LU-1.3 above.

The project would renovate a currently vacant building into a school district office and redevelop a surface parking lot into community and student-serving open space areas.

Policy LU-1.9: Evaluate individual new development
proposals to determine if the proposals are consistent
with the General Plan and to ensure that they do not
compound existing public facility and service
deficiencies.

Consistent. The proposed project would remodel and reoccupy an existing building for use as school district office and include outdoor recreation areas and parking. The intent of the evaluation throughout this document is to minimize adverse physical effects on the environment due to project implementation, including potential inconsistencies with the General Plan and/or increased demand on public services and facilities. Potential adverse effects on the environment related to the development of the proposed project have been evaluated in this document, and specifically throughout this table and in Section 4.15, Public Services.

Goal LU-2: Provide a balance of land uses that meet Santa Ana’s diverse needs.

Policy LU-2.3: Provide a diversity of land uses that
support residents, visitors, and businesses, such as
open space, areas for community gatherings, and
outdoor entertainment venues.

Consistent. The project would redevelop an existing surface parking lot into a community garden. Additionally, the project would construct a play field and play yard for students at Vista Heritage Global Academy to use for open space/recreational activities.

Policy LU-2.6: Promote rehabilitation of properties and encourage increased levels of capital investment to
create a safe and attractive environment.

Consistent. Under existing conditions, the project site is developed with a former automobile repair business and shares surface parking with a neighboring school and church. The project proposes to redevelop the site and renovate the existing building into the Vista Charter Public Schools district office, inclusive of a community garden, play field, play yard, additional parking, and landscaping.

Policy LU-2.9: Establish and maintain public open space and recreation requirements for new residential and
nonresidential uses to provide sufficient open space and recreational opportunities for Santa Ana residents and
visitors.

Consistent. Refer to response to Policies LU-1.3, LU-1.8, and LU2.3 above.

Goal LU-3: Preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts.

Policy LU-3.1: Support new development which
provides a net community benefit and contributes to
neighborhood character and identity.

Consistent. Refer to response to Policy LU-1.8 above.

Policy LU-3.4: Ensure that the scale and massing of
new development is compatible and harmonious with
the surrounding built environment.

Consistent. The project would redevelop an existing building; the project footprint and building height would be similar to existing conditions and would comply with the design standards of the FLEX1.5 land use designation. Thus, the project would be compatible with other existing buildings in the Fairview Business Park.

City Council 26 – 100 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 41
Table 5 [cont’d]
General Plan Update Land Use Element Project Consistency Analysis Applicable General Plan Land Use Policies Project Consistency Analysis Goal LU-4: Support a sustainable Santa Ana through improvements to the built environment and a culture of collaboration.

Policy LU-4.3: Encourage land uses and strategies that
reduce energy and water consumption, waste and noise
generation, soil contamination, air quality impacts, and light pollution.

Consistent. As an infill redevelopment project, the proposed district office and outdoor areas would require/produce less water, waste, soil contamination, and air quality pollutants compared to a new development.

Policy LU-4.8: Collaborate with property owners,
community organizations, and other local stakeholders
to identify opportunities for additional open space and community services, such as community gardens and
gathering places.

Consistent. The project would redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor area consisting of an approximately 2,297-square-foot community garden, an approximately 7,372-square-foot play field, and an approximately 4,640-square-foot play yard. The outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy.

Policy LU-4.9: Encourage public, private and
commercial recreational facilities in areas that are park and open space deficient.

Consistent. Refer to responses to Policies LU-1.3, LU-1.8, and LU2.3 above.

Source: City of Santa Ana, Golden City Beyond, Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element, April 2022.

Per RR LU-1, the project must comply with the applicable provisions of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. Permitted uses in the SD-82 zone are the uses permitted in the M1 zone as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18, M1 (Light Industrial), and schools by right and churches with a conditional use permit. Further, it is noted that the operational and development standards for the permitted and conditionally permitted Light Industrial Uses within the SD-82 zone shall be consistent with the operational and development standards found in Municipal Code Chapter 41, Article III, Division 18. To allow the use of the former automotive repair building for the proposed office use, a Zone Change would be required to modify the existing M1 zone to SD-82 to be consistent with the majority of the Fairview Business Park. In addition to the proposed Zone Change, the project also proposes a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to amend the operational standards of the SD-82 zoning district to allow outdoor play areas. Under current SD-82 provisions, play areas for children are limited to indoors only. Upon approval of the above entitlements, the proposed project would be consistent with the requirements of the General Plan Update and project site’s zoning, and would not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. Impacts would be less than significant.

4.11.3 Conclusion
As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR LU1 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to land use and planning than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures:

RR LU-1 Development associated with the General Plan Update would be designed and constructed in accordance with the applicable provisions of Chapter 41 (Zoning) of the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code. Development within specific plan areas, overlay areas, and specific development districts would implement zoning and City Council 26 – 101 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 42
development standards that are applicable within these subareas in addition to those in the underlying zoning district.

4.12 Mineral Resources

4.12.1 GPU EIR Findings
According to the GPU EIR, the City does not have mineral resource sectors or active or inactive mines. Thus, implementation of the General Plan Update would not cause a loss of availability of known mineral resources. The City is mostly mapped as Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ) 3, which is an area where the significance of mineral deposits cannot be determined from available data.

The area in the southeast portion of the City is mapped as MRZ-1, which means an area where no significant mineral resources are present or there is little likelihood that significant mineral resources are present. A small area in the northeast corner of the City is mapped as MRZ-2, which means significant mineral resources are known or very likely. However, the GPU EIR determined that no loss of availability of a known mineral resource would occur, and impacts would be less than significant.

4.12.2 Project Analysis
According to Figure 5.11-1, Mineral Resource Zones, of the GPU EIR, which was adapted from the California Division of Mines and Geology map of mineral resource zones around the City, the project site, like most of Santa Ana, is mapped as MRZ-3. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State and would not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local General Plan, specific plan, or other land use plan. Therefore, consistent with the General Plan Update, no impact to mineral resources would occur.

4.12.3 Conclusion
As such, the project is consistent with buildout of the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to mineral resources than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply.

4.13 Noise

4.13.1 GPU EIR Findings
The GPU EIR concluded that implementation of the General Plan Update would result in significant temporary and permanent increases of noise levels throughout the City. Future development in accordance with the General Plan Update would generate both short-term and long-term noise level increases that may impact sensitive receptors. Implementation of the General Plan Update would include regulations designed to protect new sensitive land uses from excessive noise levels.

City Council 26 – 102 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 43
The GPU EIR described that Mitigation Measure N-1 would reduce potential noise impacts during construction to the extent feasible. However, due to the potential for proximity of construction activities to sensitive uses, the number of construction projects potentially occurring simultaneously, and the potential duration of construction activities, construction noise could result in a temporary substantial increase in noise levels above ambient conditions. Therefore, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

The GPU EIR determined that buildout of the General Plan Update would cause substantial traffic noise to increase on local roadways and could locate sensitive receptors in areas that exceed established noise standards. While Mitigation Measure N-2 would reduce potential interior noise impacts to future noise sensitive receptors below thresholds, there are no feasible or practical mitigation measures available to reduce project-generated traffic noise to less than significant levels for existing residences along affected roadways. Thus, the GPU EIR determined that traffic noise would remain a significant and unavoidable impact.

The GPU EIR discussed that construction activity would generate varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the construction procedures and equipment, that has the potential to exceed the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) criteria for architectural damage (e.g., 0.12 inches per second peak particle velocity (PPV) for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 inches/second PPV for non-engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 inches/second PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). The GPU EIR determined that implementation of Mitigation Measure N-2 and adherence to associated performance standards, would reduce impacts to less than significant levels.

4.13.2 Project Analysis
The following section evaluates potential short- and long-term noise and ground-borne vibration impacts that would result from the proposed project.

THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Exterior Noise Standards
Chapter 18, Article VI, Noise Control, of the Municipal Code provides criteria for ambient noise measurements as well as noise standards for residential, school, hospital, and church use. When non-transportation (stationary) noise is the noise source of concern, the City applies performance standards from Municipal Code Section 18.312, Exterior Noise Standards, to ensure that noise producers do not adversely affect noise-sensitive land uses. Table 6, Exterior Noise Standards, summarizes the City’s exterior noise standards.

Table 6
Exterior Noise Standards
Time Period Noise Levels (dBA)
L50 L25 L8 L2 Lmax
7:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m. 55 60 65 70 75
10:00 p.m. – 7:00 a.m. 50 55 60 65 70
Note: A 5 dBA penalty shall be applied in the event of an alleged offensive noise such as impact noise, simple tones, speech, music, or any combination of thereof. If the measured ambient level exceeds any of the first four noise limit categories, the allowable noise exposure standard shall be increased to reflect the ambient noise level. If the ambient noise level exceeds the fifth noise limit category, the maximum allowable noise level under this category shall be increased to reflect the maximum ambient noise level.

Source: City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 18.312, Exterior Noise Standards.

City Council 26 – 103 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 44
Construction Noise Standards
The City’s noise ordinance exempts noise from construction activities that occur during the daytime. No construction is permitted outside of the hours identified in Municipal Code Section 18-314(e). Specifically, construction activities are restricted to the daytime hours of 7:00 am to 8:00 pm, Monday through Saturday. No construction activities are permitted on Sundays or federal holidays. Additionally, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) established construction noise threshold of 80 dBA Leq for long-term construction projects, which is conservatively used to analyze the project’s construction noise impact.

Existing Conditions
The project vicinity is characterized by mostly residential and commercial land uses, with urbanrelated activities (i.e., auto repair mechanical equipment and parking areas) being the primary sources of stationary noise. Most of the existing noise in the project area is generated from traffic along surrounding roadways including North Fairview Street and West 5th Street.

Noise Measurements
In order to quantify existing ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project site, Michael Baker International (Michael Baker) conducted three noise measurements on June 28, 2023; refer to Attachment B, Noise Data. The noise measurement sites were representative of typical existing noise exposure within and immediately adjacent to the project site. The three ten-minute measurements were taken between 11:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. Short-term (Leq) measurements are considered representative of the noise levels throughout the day and relate closely with the noise standards for the project area; refer to Table 7, Noise Measurements.

Table 7
Noise Measurements
Site
No. Location Leq (dBA) Lmin (dBA) Lmax (dBA) Time
1 Northeast of Romero-Cruz Academy building 72.4 87.7 49.9 11:08 a.m. 2 Vista Heritage Global Academy 66.2 80.7 46.5 11:26 a.m. 3 Cul-de-sac of West 7th Street 51.1 79.6 41.1 11:45 a.m.

Notes: dBA = A-weighted decibels, Leq = Equivalent Sound Level; Lmin = Minimum Sound Level; Lmax = Maximum Sound Level, Peak = Highest Instantaneous Sound Level
Source: Michael Baker International, May 18, 2023.

Meteorological conditions were partly cloudy skies, warm temperatures, with light wind speeds (6 miles per hour), and low humidity. Noise monitoring equipment used for the ambient noise survey consisted of a Brüel & Kjær Hand-held Analyzer Type 2250 equipped with a Type 4189 prepolarized microphone. The monitoring equipment complies with applicable requirements of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for sound level meters.

Noise Sensitive Receptors
Noise-sensitive land uses are generally considered to include those uses where noise exposure could result in health-related risks to individuals, as well as places where quiet is an essential element of their intended purpose. Residential dwellings are of primary concern because of the potential for increased and prolonged exposure of individuals to both interior and exterior noise levels. Additional land uses such as parks, historic sites, cemeteries, and recreation areas are considered sensitive to increases in exterior noise levels. Schools, churches, hotels, libraries, and City Council 26 – 104 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 45
other places where low interior noise levels are essential are also considered noise-sensitive land uses.

The closest sensitive receptors to the project site are residential uses located approximately 100 feet to the north of the project site and the existing Romero-Cruz Academy School is located approximately 100 feet to the west.

PROJECT-GENERATED NOISE IMPACTS
It is difficult to specify noise levels that are generally acceptable to everyone; noise that is considered a nuisance to one person may be unnoticed by another. Standards may be based on documented complaints in response to documented noise levels or based on studies of the ability of people to sleep, talk, or work under various noise conditions.

Short-term Construction Impacts
The project involves remodeling activities associated with paving, building construction, and architectural coating applications and would be completed in approximately eight months. Typical noise levels generated by construction equipment are shown in Table 8, Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Typical Construction Equipment. Operating cycles for these types of construction equipment may involve one or two minutes of full power operation followed by three to four minutes at lower power settings. Other primary sources of acoustical disturbance would be due to random incidents, which would last less than one minute (such as dropping large pieces of equipment or the hydraulic movement of machinery lifts).

Construction noise levels in the project vicinity would fluctuate depending on the particular type, number, and duration of usage for the varying equipment. The effects of construction noise largely depend on the type of construction activities occurring on any given day, noise levels generated by those activities, distances to noise-sensitive receptors, and the existing ambient noise environment in the receptor’s vicinity. Construction generally occurs in several discrete phases, with each phase requiring different equipment with varying noise characteristics. These phases alter the characteristics of the noise environment generated on the proposed project site and in the surrounding community for the duration of the construction process.

Table 8
Maximum Noise Levels Generated by Typical Construction Equipment Type of Equipment Acoustical Use Factor1 Lmax at 50 Feet (dBA) Lmax at 100 Feet (dBA) Compressor 40 78 72
Crane 40 82 75
Concrete Mixer Truck 40 76 73
Forklift 40 85 72
Paver 50 77 71
Roller 20 80 74
Tractor 40 84 78
Water Truck 40 80 74
Note:

1. Acoustical Use Factor (percent): Estimates the fraction of time each piece of construction equipment is operating at full power (i.e., its loudest condition) during a construction operation.

Source: Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA-HEP-05-054), January 2006.

Noise levels depicted in Table 8 represent maximum sound levels (Lmax), which are the highest individual sound occurring at an individual time period. The closest sensitive receptors to the City Council 26 – 105 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 46
project site are single-family residences and the Romero-Cruz Academy School located approximately 100 feet to the north and west of the project site, respectively. As shown in Table 8, construction noise levels could range between 71 dBA and 78 dBA at 100 feet. Although sensitive receptors may be exposed to increased noise levels during project construction, construction noise levels would not exceed the FTA threshold of 80 dBA. In addition, construction activities are exempt from the City’s thresholds as it is a normal part in the urban life. Furthermore, compliance with RR NOI-2 would ensure that the project construction activities would comply with the City’s Noise Ordinance detailed in Municipal Code Section 18-314(e) and occur only Monday through Saturday between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. As such, project construction noise would be exempt from the City’s noise standards and compliance with hours of construction activities would reduce impacts to less than significant in this regard.

Long-term Operational Impacts
Mobile Noise
Implementation of the project would result in vehicle use on adjacent roadways, thereby increasing vehicular noise in the site vicinity. As determined by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in the Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol (September 2013), a doubling in roadway traffic volumes is required to generate any noticeable increase in roadway noise levels.22
According to the Vista Heritage Global Academy Expansion Trip Generation Assessment prepared by Urban Crossroads and dated July 24, 2023, the proposed project would generate 84 average daily trips without taking trip reductions from the existing uses as they are currently vacant. The nearest major roadway segment to the project vicinity is Fairview Street which currently experiences approximately 40,000 average daily trips.23 As such, the project’s minimal trip generation (approximately 84 average daily trips) would not double existing traffic volumes along nearby roadways and an increase in traffic noise along local roadways would be imperceptible. Project-related traffic noise impacts would be less than significant.

Stationary Noise Impacts
Stationary noise sources associated with the proposed project would include mechanical equipment, parking activities, and outdoor play field areas. These noise sources are typically intermittent and short in duration. Noise has a decay rate due to distance attenuation, which is calculated based on the Inverse Square Law. Based upon the Inverse Square Law, sound levels decrease by 6 dBA for each doubling of distance from the source.24 All stationary noise activities would be required to comply with RR NOI-3 in accordance with the City’s noise standards.

Mechanical Equipment
Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) units typically generate noise levels of approximately 66 dBA Leq at three feet from the source.25 HVAC units are expected to be located 22 California Department of Transportation, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013. 23 City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element, https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/santaanaca/uploads/2022/04/Circulation-Element.pdf, accessed on July 28, 2023. 24 Cyril M. Harris, Noise Control in Buildings, 1994. 25 Berger, Elliott H., et al., Noise Navigator Sound Level Database with Over 1700 Measurement Values, June 26, 2015.

City Council 26 – 106 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 47
on the center of the rooftop and the closest sensitive receptor to the HVAC units is the existing Vista Charter Global Academy located at approximately 130 feet to the south. At the distance of 130 feet, HVAC noise levels would attenuate to approximately 33 dBA. Therefore, HVAC noise levels would be below the City’s exterior daytime standards of 55 dBA and nighttime standards of 45 dBA in accordance with RR NOI-3 and would be lower than existing ambient noise levels of

66.2 dBA near the nearest sensitive receptor (Vista Charter Global Academy); refer to Table 7.

Furthermore, HVAC equipment are already present on the rooftop of the existing building and the project would not introduce additional HVAC equipment. Therefore, the nearest sensitive receptors would not be directly exposed to substantial noise from on-site HVAC equipment and impacts would be less than significant.

Parking Areas
Traffic associated with parking activities is typically not of sufficient volume to exceed community noise standards, which are based on a time-averaged scale such as the CNEL scale. However, the instantaneous maximum sound levels generated by a car door slamming, engine starting up and car pass-by may be an annoyance to adjacent noise-sensitive receptors. Estimates of the maximum noise levels associated with some parking lot activities are presented in Table 9, Typical Noise Levels Generated by Parking Lots.

Table 9
Typical Noise Levels Generated by Parking Lots
Noise Source Maximum Noise Levels
at 50 Feet from Source
Car door slamming 61 dBA Leq
Car starting 60 dBA Leq
Car idling 53 dBA Leq
Source: Kariel, H. G., Noise in Rural Recreational Environments, Canadian Acoustics 19(5), 3-10, 1991.

The project would provide 63 parking spaces on-site. As shown in Table 9, parking activities can result in noise levels up to 61 dBA at a distance of 50 feet. The proposed project would have intermittent parking activities noise due to the movement of vehicles. The nearest sensitive receptors are the existing single-family residences located approximately 100 feet from the proposed parking spaces on the north of the project site. At this distance, noise levels from parking activities would range from 47 dBA to 55 dBA. As previously noted, parking lot noise are instantaneous noise levels compared to noise standards in the CNEL scale, which are averaged over time. As a result, actual noise levels over time resulting from parking lot activities would be far lower than what is identified above. Further, parking activity noise currently exists within the project site and would not represent a new source of noise. Impacts would be less than significant in this regard.

Outdoor Play Area
The proposed project proposes outdoor play areas along the northern boundary of the existing Vista Charter Global Academy building, in the southern portion of the project site. The play area has the potential to be accessed by groups of children intermittently for gathering, etc. Noise generated by groups of people (i.e., crowds) is dependent on several factors including vocal effort, impulsiveness, and the random orientation of the crowd members. Crowd noise is estimated at 60 dBA at one meter (3.28 feet) away for raised normal speaking.26 This noise level would have a +5 dBA adjustment for the impulsiveness of the noise source, and a -3 dBA adjustment for the 26 M.J. Hayne, et al, Prediction of Crowd Noise, Acoustics, November 2006.

City Council 26 – 107 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 48
random orientation of the crowd members.27 Therefore, crowd noise would be approximately 62 dBA at one meter from the source (i.e., the outdoor gathering areas).

The nearest sensitive receptors would be the residential uses to the north of the project site, located approximately 200 feet from the proposed outdoor play areas. Therefore, crowd noise at the nearest sensitive receptor would be 26 dBA, which would not exceed the City’s noise standards for residential uses in accordance with RR NOI-3 (i.e., 55 dBA for daytime and 45 dBA for nighttime) and would be lower than existing ambient noise levels of 51.1 dBA near the nearest sensitive receptors (residential uses to the north); refer to Table 7. As a result, noise generated from the outdoor play area would be further reduced. As such, project noise associated with outdoor play area would have a less than significant impact would occur in this regard.

PROJECT-GENERATED VIBRATION IMPACTS
Project construction activities can generate varying degrees of groundborne vibration, depending on the construction procedure and the construction equipment used. Operation of construction equipment generates vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish in amplitude with distance from the source. The effect on buildings located in the vicinity of the construction site often varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and construction characteristics of the receiver building(s). The results from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibration at moderate levels, to slight damage at the highest levels. Groundborne vibrations from construction activities rarely reach levels that damage structures.

This evaluation uses the FTA architectural damage criterion for continuous vibrations of 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry. Typical vibration produced by construction equipment is illustrated in Table 10, Typical Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment.

Table 10
Typical Vibration Levels for Construction Equipment
Equipment Approximate peak particle velocity at
25 feet (inch/sec)
Approximate peak particle velocity at
100 feet (inch/sec)1
Large bulldozer 0.089 0.0111
Loaded trucks 0.076 0.0095
Small bulldozer 0.003 0.0004
Notes:

1. Calculated using the following formula:

PPV equip = PPV ref x (25/D)1.1
where: PPV equip = the peak particle velocity in in/sec of the equipment adjusted for the distance PPV ref = the reference vibration level in in/sec from Table 7-4 of the FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines
D = the distance from the equipment to the receiver
Source: California Department of Transportation, Transportation and Construction Vibration Manual, April 2020.

The nearest sensitive receptor structure is the existing single-family buildings located approximately 100 feet to the north of anticipated project site. As indicated in Table 10, vibration velocities from typical heavy construction equipment used during project construction would range from 0.0004 to 0.0111 in/sec PPV at 100 feet from the source of activity, which would not exceed the 0.3 in/sec PPV threshold. As such, the impacts would be less than significant.

The proposed project use would not generate operational groundborne vibration that could be felt by surrounding uses. Additionally, the proposed project would not involve railroads or substantial 27 Ibid.

City Council 26 – 108 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 49
heavy truck operations, and therefore would not result in operational vibration impacts at surrounding uses. No impacts would occur in this regard.

EXCESSIVE NOISE NEAR AIRPORTS
The nearest airport to the project site is the John Wayne Airport located approximately five miles to the southeast. The project site is not located within two miles of the airport. Additionally, the project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or related facilities. Therefore, project implementation would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels associated with aircraft. As such, the impacts would be less than significant.

NOISE IMPACTS TO ON-SITE SENSITIVE RECEPTORS
The project site is located adjacent to an existing railroad alignment. The railroad is currently not operational and is being developed to build a fixed guideway system, OC Streetcar. Due to the proximity of the project site to the railroad alignment, future operations of the railroad have the potential to elevate existing noise levels, particularly during streetcar operations and crossing signal noise along Fairview Street located at approximately 90 feet from the project site. Based on the Santa Ana and Garden Grove Fixed Guideway Project Noise and Vibration Technical Report, prepared by URS Corporation and dated February 2012, noise from the operation of future streetcars have the potential to range from approximately 43 dBA Ldn during crossing activities to 59 dBA Ldn during blowing warning horn at approximately 100 feet. As such, exterior noise levels impacting the project site from the operation of future streetcars would not increase the existing ambient noise levels; refer to Table 7. Furthermore, future noise level impacts from OC Streetcar operations would be within the normally acceptable range of 50 to 70 dBA CNEL.28 As such, noise impacts to on-site sensitive receptors would be less than significant.

4.13.3 Conclusion
As such, the project is consistent with buildout of the General Plan Update. Upon implementation of RR NOI-2 and NOI-3, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to noise and vibration than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures:

RR NOI-2 Construction Noise Sources: Section 18-314(e) of the Santa Ana Municipal code prohibits construction activities to the hours of 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM Monday through Saturday.

RR NOI-3 Stationary Noise Sources: Section 18.312 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code establishes standards for stationary noise sources.
28 State of California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, General Plan Guidelines, July 2017.

City Council 26 – 109 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 50

4.14 Population and Housing

4.14.1 GPU EIR Findings
The GPU EIR concluded that full buildout of the General Plan Update would result in a population of 431,629 and the City’s 2045 population growth would be approximately 20 percent greater than the Orange County Council of Government (COG) 2045 population projections for the City.

Furthermore, it is anticipated that General Plan Update buildout would result in 115,053 dwelling units, which exceeds the Orange County COG’s housing projections for the City by 38 percent.

As such, impacts are considered potentially significant. However, there are no feasible mitigation measures to mitigate the population and housing growth anticipated for the buildout of the General Plan Update. Further, the purpose of the General Plan Update is to provide orderly growth in the City through the distribution, location, balance, and extent of land uses, and the General Plan Update would provide more housing opportunities than currently exist during a time when there is a housing crisis. Still, impacts to population and housing were determined to be significant and unavoidable.

4.14.2 Project Analysis
The project proposes to remodel and reoccupy a building formerly occupied by an automotive repair use as an office building for Vista Charter Public Schools. Vista Charter Public Schools operates six public charter schools in Los Angeles and Orange County and serves a total of 1,500 students. The proposed project creates an opportunity to have a district office located next to the organization’s largest school, Vista Heritage Global Academy. While the headquarters would provide new office and conference space for employees of Vista Charter Public Schools, it is not anticipated that the project would generate new employment opportunities within the existing organization. Additionally, proposed outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy and would not increase existing school capacity. As a result, the proposed project would not directly or indirectly result in substantial unplanned population growth in the area or displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing. Further, as discussed in Section 4.11, Land Use and Planning, the project would meet the design standards of the FLEX-1.5 designation and would be consistent with the applicable General Plan Update Land Use Element goals and policies. Therefore, consistent with the General Plan Update, less than significant impacts to population and housing would occur.

4.14.3 Conclusion
As such, the project is consistent with of the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to population and housing than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply.

4.15 Public Services

4.15.1 GPU EIR Findings
The GPU EIR concluded that introduction of new structures and additional residents and workers to the City would increase the demand for fire and police protection services. However, funding City Council 26 – 110 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 51
for additional staff, equipment, and facilities would come from property taxes, grants, special revenue funds, and the City’s general fund as future development accommodated by the General Plan Update occurs. The additional demand for fire and police protection services due to population growth generated within the City would be satisfied through these sources.

Additionally, the GPU EIR determined that school districts within the City would have the capacity to accommodate future students generated as a result of the proposed General Plan Update.

Should there be a need to expand or construct new facilities, funding for new schools would be obtained from the mitigation fee program pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 50, and State and federal funding programs. Pursuant to Section 65996 of the Government Code, payment of school fees is deemed to provide full and complete school facilities mitigation. Further, while library services would also experience an increase in demand, property taxes and library fines and fees are expected to satisfy this impact; overall, impacts would be less than significant.

4.15.2 Project Analysis
As discussed above, buildout of General Plan Update is projected to increase the population of the City beyond growth projections. However, the project would not contribute to population growth as the proposed district office would serve existing employees and the outdoor recreation areas would serve existing students. As such, the proposed project would not increase demands on existing public services. Additionally, compliance with RR FP-1 would ensure that the proposed project would meet the fire regulations outlined in California Health and Safety Code, and RR SS1 would ensure that the proposed project would pay school development fees authorized by Section 65996 of the California Government Code. The project would also generate property tax which further fund fire and police protection services and library services. Therefore, consistent with the General Plan Update, less than significant impacts would occur.

4.15.3 Conclusion
As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR FP1 and SS-1 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to public services than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures:

RR FP-1 New buildings are required to meet the fire regulations outlined in California Health and Safety Code (Sections 13000 et seq.).

RR SS-1 New residential and commercial development shall pay development fees authorized by Section 65996 of the California Government Code to be “full and complete school facilities mitigation.”

4.16 Recreation

4.16.1 GPU EIR Findings
The GPU EIR concluded that buildout of the General Plan Update would generate the demand for approximately 564 acres of parkland and recreational facilities assumed to serve the 2045 population. The City is essentially built-out and very limited vacant land is available to be developed with new recreational opportunities. New or expanded facilities would need to occur City Council 26 – 111 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 52
outside of park-designated parcels and the development of these facilities may have an adverse physical effect on the environment, including impacts relating to air quality, biological resources, lighting, noise, and traffic. As such, it was determined that even with implementation of Mitigation Measure REC-1, which would require preparation of a public park utilization study, followed by further mitigation such as land dedication or fair shares contributions for projects resulting in a significant impact based on the study. impacts to recreation were determined to be significant and unavoidable.

4.16.2 Project Analysis
As discussed, the project is not anticipated to generate population growth. As such, it is not anticipated that the project would increase demand on the City’s existing parks or recreation facilities. Rather, the project proposes to redevelop the existing shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor area consisting of an approximately 2,297-square foot community garden, an approximately 7,372-square foot play field, and an approximately 4,640- square foot play yard. Outdoor areas would serve existing students of the adjoining Vista Heritage Global Academy and would not increase existing school capacity. As such, while the project does not provide additional public parkland, it would alleviate demand on existing City recreation facilities that may otherwise be utilized by the students. Environmental impacts associated with the construction of these outdoor areas are addressed in the respective topical sections of this document (i.e., aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and transportation). Further, the proposed project would be required to either dedicate land or pay in-lieu impact fees per Municipal Code Chapter 34, Article VIII, and Chapter 35, Article IV as well as the Quimby Act. The fees collected would be used for development and improvement of public parks and recreation facilities throughout the City. Thus, the proposed project would not cause or accelerate substantial physical deterioration of existing parks or other recreational facilities nor include or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Impacts would be less than significant.

4.16.3 Conclusion
As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to recreation than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply.

4.17 Transportation

4.17.1 GPU EIR Findings
The GPU EIR determined that buildout of the General Plan Update would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system following implementation of RR T-1. RR T-1 requires design and operation of a multimodal circulation system network with all users in mind including bicyclists, public transportation vehicles and riders, and pedestrians of all ages and abilities. The General Plan Update incorporates future networks and policies related to supporting transit, bicycles, and pedestrians in the City, which are consistent with regional and local planning efforts supporting these modes of travel. Additionally, implementation of the City Council 26 – 112 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 53
General Plan Update would result in a reduction of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per service population in comparison to existing conditions at the time the GPU EIR was prepared and would achieve a VMT per service population of at least 15 percent lower than the Countywide VMT per service population. The GPU EIR also determined that buildout of the General Plan Update would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or result in inadequate emergency access following implementation of RR T-2. RR T-2 requires projects pursuant to the General Plan Update to implement fire protection requirements as detailed in the Orange County Fire Authority’s Fire Prevention Guidelines and the California Fire Code.

4.17.2 Project Analysis
No changes are proposed to the existing circulation system in the project area and thus, the proposed project would not conflict with any program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system.

According to the City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines (City Traffic Guidelines), a project can be presumed to have a less-than-significant VMT impact if the project satisfies one of the following screening criteria: 29
• Projects which serve the local community and have the potential to reduce VMT, such as neighborhood K-12 schools and local-serving retail less than 50,000 sq. ft. (Charter schools are excluded from this criteria).
• Projects that generate less than 110 net daily trips. • Projects located within Transit Priority Areas (TPAs); refer to City Traffic Guidelines Appendix A, Santa Ana Transit Priority Areas.
• Projects located in a low-VMT generating Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ). City Traffic Guidelines Appendix B, VMT/SP in Santa Ana as Compared to Orange County Average, shows VMT per service population in Santa Ana as compared to the County average.

Low-VMT TAZs per Santa Ana’s threshold of significance are any TAZs generating VMT 15 percent below the County average.

The proposed project would renovate the approximately 5,837-square foot former automotive repair building as the Vista Charter Public Schools district office. According to the Vista Heritage Global Academy Expansion Trip Generation Assessment (Trip Generation Memo), prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc. and dated July 24, 2023, the proposed project would generate approximately 84 average daily trips with 14 morning peak hour trips and 12 afternoon peak hour trips; refer to Attachment C, Trip Generation Memo. Therefore, the proposed project would meet the screening criteria related to projects that generate less than 110 net daily trips.

Additionally, according to City Traffic Guidelines Appendix A, Santa Ana Transit Priority Areas, the project site is located within a TPA, which is defined as a 0.5-mile radius around an existing or planned major transit stop (e.g., Metrolink Station, Streetcar Station, etc.) or an existing stop along a high-quality transit corridor. Thus, the project also meets the screening criteria related to projects located within TPAs.
29 City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines, September 2019.

City Council 26 – 113 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 54
Overall, the project meets two of the VMT screening requirements and thus, no VMT analysis would be required. The project is presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact.

Additionally, the project does not propose any changes to the City’s existing circulation system and would not introduce incompatible uses to area roadways. The site is accessible from North Fairview Street via two driveways to the west, and two alleys connecting to West 5th Street to the south and southeast. Site access would not change as part of the proposed project. Additionally, the proposed project is not anticipated to require road closures during project construction as all proposed improvements would occur within the project boundary.

4.17.3 Conclusion
Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project-specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe transportation impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply.

4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources

4.18.1 GPU EIR Findings
The City consulted with applicable Native American tribes in accordance with Senate Bill (SB) 18 and Assembly Bill (AB) 52. Given that tribal cultural resources are site-specific in nature. Future development allowed under the General Plan Update could potentially impact and cause significant adverse impacts to tribal cultural resources. Thus, Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 would reduce such impacts to less than significant levels. Specifically, to reduce impacts to archaeological resources and prior to ground-disturbing activities, Mitigation Measure CUL-4 requires an Archaeological Resources Assessment be conducted under the supervision of an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professionally Qualified Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified and impacts cannot be avoided, Mitigation Measure CUL-5 requires a Phase II Testing and Evaluation investigation be performed by an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards to determine the significance of the resource(s). Per Mitigation Measure CUL6, if the Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify archaeological resources but indicates the project area to be highly sensitive for archeological resources, a qualified archaeologist and a Native American monitor culturally affiliated with the project area must monitor all ground-disturbing activities in the areas of high archaeological sensitivity. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground-disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery must halt while the resources are evaluated for significance by a qualified archaeologist. Pursuant to Mitigation Measure CUL-7, if the Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources, an archaeologist meeting the Secretary’s Standards must be retained on-call. The archaeologist must inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. Overall, the GPU EIR determined that implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-4 through CUL-7 would reduce tribal cultural resources impacts to less than significant levels.

City Council 26 – 114 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 55

4.18.2 Project Analysis
Although the project would redevelop the shared surface parking lot in the southern portion of the site into an outdoor community garden, play field, and play yard, the proposed project would not require extensive excavation that could uncover previously undiscovered tribal cultural resources.

Typical excavation depth would be a maximum of four feet for the majority of the site with the deepest excavation of approximately eight feet for an underground infiltration chamber related to stormwater improvements. No new or substantially more severe impacts would occur compared to the determinations of the GPU EIR, and no new mitigation measures are required.

4.18.3 Conclusion
Overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project-specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe tribal cultural resource impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply.

4.19 Utilities and Service Systems

4.19.1 GPU EIR Findings
The GPU EIR concluded that increased sewer flow from buildout of the General Plan Update would require pipe upsizing to meet the demands of new residential and commercial uses; however, the Orange County Sanitation District Master Plan accounts for trunk line improvements and the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD), in general, has a functioning and effective process in place to ensure the regional sewer infrastructure is able to support future developments in the City. Further, OCSD confirmed that wastewater generated by buildout of the General Plan Update would be adequately treated by Treatment Plant No. 1. The GPU EIR also concluded sufficient Orange County Water District water supplies and Orange County Public Works stormwater drainage facilities would be available to serve the full General Plan Update buildout from existing entitlements and resources, and new or expanded entitlements would not be required beyond those improvements already planned for the City.

4.19.2 Project Analysis
Based on wastewater generation rates for commercial uses in the West Santa Ana Focus Area, contained within Volume III, Appendix H-a, of the GPU EIR, the proposed project would generate approximately 2,036 gallons of wastewater per day.30 The proposed project would connect to existing wastewater infrastructure, which would have the capacity to serve the project demand in addition to existing service commitments and would not require the expansion of existing facilities.

Compliance with RR U-2 would ensure that OCSD connection fees are paid in accordance with Ordinance No. OCSD-40. Additionally, as discussed above, runoff from the proposed project is currently collected by stormwater drainage facilities in the surrounding roadway. The proposed project would implement BMPs contained in the WQMP to capture and infiltrate stormwater runoff. 30 Based on a rate of 2,262 gallons of wastewater per day per acre for a 0.9-acre site. The GPU EIR separated land uses into either residential or commercial in order to determine average wastewater generation. While it is acknowledged that the proposed project would involve office use, commercial rates were deemed most appropriate in order to compare the proposed project to the analysis contained within the GPU EIR.

City Council 26 – 115 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 56
Any runoff leaving the project site would continue to drain to the existing drain inlets in the project area, and the proposed project would not require or result in the construction of new or expanded storm water drainage facilities. Based on water demand rates for commercial uses, contained within Volume III, Appendix H-b, of the GPU EIR, the proposed project would require approximately 2,250 gallons of water per day, which would be met by the City’s supplies.31 However, compliance with RR U-5 would ensure that the project is designed pursuant to the water conservation and efficiency requirements of the Municipal Code, and RR U-6 would ensure water connection fees are paid. Therefore, consistent with the General Plan Update, impacts related to water supplies, wastewater treatment, and storm water drainage from the proposed project would be less than significant.

The proposed project would generate a nominal amount of solid waste during construction activities. However, the proposed project would comply with the CALGreen Building Code Standards, which requires that at least 65 percent of nonhazardous construction and demolition waste generated during most new construction be recycled and/or salvaged for reuse. During operations, the proposed project would generate approximately 34.8 pounds of solid waste per day, typical of office uses.32,33 According to the GPU EIR, solid waste generated in the City is transferred to Orange County solid waste landfill system which has ample capacity to accommodate increased volumes of waste from the City through 2053. Furthermore, the proposed project would be required to comply with the requirements of AB 341, which mandates recycling for commercial land uses, and AB 1826, which requires that any organic waste generated in amounts over a certain threshold would be recycled. Therefore, the proposed project would not generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards or of the future capacity of local infrastructure, and would comply with all applicable federal, State, and local solid waste regulations. Consistent with the General Plan Update, impacts would be less than significant.

The site is currently served by SCE and Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). Project impacts with regards to electricity and natural gas services would be nominal given that operations of the proposed office would utilize minimal electricity and natural gas. As summarized under Section 4.6, Energy, the project would not result in substantial energy consumption, upon compliance with existing regulatory requirements, including the 2022 Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards and 2012 Appliance Efficiency Regulations pursuant to RR E-3 and E-4.

Additionally, the project would be required to pay connection and ongoing user fees to SCE and SoCalGas to offset project impacts on existing dry utility services and resources. Thus, impacts with regards to dry utilities would be less than significant.

4.19.3 Conclusion
As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. With implementation of RR U-2, U-5, U-6, HYD-4, and HYD-5 identified in the GPU EIR, the proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to utilities and service systems than anticipated by the GPU EIR.
31 Based on a rate of 2,500 gallons of water per day per acre for a 0.9-acre site. The GPU EIR separated land uses into either residential or commercial in order to determine average water demand. While it is acknowledged that the proposed project would involve office use, commercial rates were deemed most appropriate in order to compare the proposed project to the analysis contained within the GPU EIR. 32 Based on a rate of 0.006 pounds of solid waste per day per square foot for a 5,800square foot office building. 33 CalRecycle, Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates, https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastecharacterization/general/rates, accessed August 10, 2023.

City Council 26 – 116 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 57
Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures:

Refer to Section 4.6, Energy, for RR E-3 and E-4, and Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, for RR HYD-4 and HYD-5.

RR U-2 Any new connections to the Orange County Sanitation District system or expansion of a previous connection shall pay a capital facilities charge in accordance with Ordinance No. OCSD-40.

RR U-5 Any development implemented under the General Plan Update shall abide by the water conservation and efficiency requirements detailed in Chapter 8, Article XVI, Chapter 39, Article VI and Chapter 41, Article XVI of the Santa Ana Municipal Code.

RR U-6 Water connection fees shall be paid in accordance with Chapter 39, Article II of the City’s Municipal Code and plumbing shall be installed in compliance with Chapter 8, Article III.

4.20 Wildfire

4.20.1 GPU EIR Findings
The GPU EIR concludes that buildout of the General Plan Update would not substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, exacerbate wildfire risks thereby creating elevated particulate concentration exposure to people, nor would it expose people or structures to significant risks. The General Plan Update would require the installation and maintenance of associated infrastructure in areas that are undeveloped or vacant which could exacerbate fire risk.

4.20.2 Project Analysis
The CEQA Guidelines require analysis of wildfire risk in State responsibility areas (SRAs) and/or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones. As stated in the GPU EIR, the nearest fire hazard severity zone (FHSZ) in an SRA to the City of Santa Ana is a high FHSZ about four miles east along the western edge of Loma Ridge. The nearest FHSZ in a local responsibility area (LRA) is about 3.8 miles at the southern tip of the Peters Canyon Regional Park. Therefore, the project site is not in or near SRAs or lands classified as very high FHSZs. Additionally, no area in the City is a wildland-urban interface. As such, no impact related to wildfire risk would occur due to development of the proposed project.

4.20.3 Conclusion
As such, the project is consistent with the General Plan Update. The proposed project would not have any specific effects which are peculiar to the project or the site. There are no project specific impacts or potentially significant off-site or cumulative impacts the GPU EIR failed to analyze, and there are no new significant or substantially more severe impacts to wildfire than anticipated by the GPU EIR.

Applicable GPU EIR Regulatory Requirements/Mitigation Measures: No GPU EIR regulatory requirements or mitigation measures apply.

City Council 26 – 117 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 58

5. Findings
As discussed in Section 3.0, the City of Santa Ana intends to pursue a CEQA exemption for the proposed project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. As stated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(d), the exemption requires a project to meet the following conditions:

1. The project is consistent with:
a. A community plan adopted as part of a general plan,
b. A zoning action which zoned or designated the parcel on which the project would be located to accommodate a particular density of development, or c. A general plan of a local agency, and

2. An EIR was certified by the lead agency for the zoning action, the community plan, or the general plan.

The General Plan Update and GPU EIR were adopted and certified by the Santa Ana City Council in 2022. The project site is located within the General Plan Update West Santa Ana Boulevard Focus Area. This portion of the City was historically a more industrial area; the General Plan Update intends to transition the area from a group of auto-oriented neighborhoods, businesses, and institutions into a series of transit-oriented neighborhoods that support and benefit from future streetcar stops. Additionally, the industrial portion of the focus area (where the project site is located) is envisioned and designated Industrial/Flex (FLEX) to promote new opportunities, including new clean industrial/manufacturing, maker-type spaces, and other uses that are more compatible with the surrounding residential areas than traditional industrial uses. The project site has a land use designation of Industrial/Flex-Low (FLEX-1.5), which is intended for office/industrial flex spaces, small-scale research and development, clean manufacturing, and live-work uses. The proposed project would redevelop a former automotive repair building into a school district office, which is a permitted use under the FLEX-1.5 designation and considered in the analysis of the GPU EIR. Additionally, the General Plan Update encourages adaptive reuse of existing industrial buildings within this focus area, which would be achieved with implementation of the project. As such, the GPU EIR adequately anticipated and analyzed the impacts of this project, identified applicable mitigation measures necessary to reduce impacts of the project, and the project implements the applicable mitigation measures. The project, therefore, qualifies for an exemption from additional environmental review as set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.

Overall, the project qualifies for the exemption because the following findings can be made:
a) The project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified.

Based on General Plan Update Land Use Element Figure LU-1, Land Use Map, the project site is designated Industrial/Flex-Low (FLEX-1.5). The FLEX-1.5 designation allows a maximum 1.5 FAR and/or 30 dwelling per acre, with a maximum building height of three stories.

The proposed project would renovate the approximately 5,837-square foot former automotive repair building as the Vista Charter Public Schools district office. The project site is approximately

0.9-acre. Thus, the project would result in a 0.15 FAR. Additionally, the building would maintain its existing building height of approximately 19.3 feet. Thus, the proposed project would be consistent with the site’s FLEX-1.5 designation development density established by the General City Council 26 – 118 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 59
Plan Update. Additionally, the project would be consistent with applicable General Plan Update Land Use Element policies as detailed in Table 5. Overall, the project would be consistent with Criterion A.
b) There are no project specific effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.

The project site is located within the Fairview Business Park in an industrial area of Santa Ana.

The Fairview Business Park is currently developed with institutional (Vista Heritage Global Academy and Templo Calvario Church), industrial, and office uses. As stated, the site’s FLEX1.5 land use designation is intended to provide context-appropriate development in areas with existing industrial uses. The proposed Vista Charter Public Schools district office and outdoor open space areas would complement and serve the existing Vista Heritage Global Academy located adjacent to the site’s southern boundary. Additionally, upon approval of the required Zone Change and Zoning Ordinance Amendment, project development would be required to comply with applicable standards for the SD-82 zone, which is consistent with the standards for Light Industrial uses in Municipal Code Sections 41-473 through 41-481. As such, the proposed project would not result in effects which are peculiar to the project or its site and the project would be consistent with Criterion B.
c) There are no project specific impacts which the prior EIR failed to analyze as significant effects.

The GPU EIR concluded that buildout of the General Plan Update would result in a total of 115,053 residential units and 72,967,816 square feet of non-residential development by 2045.

The proposed project, which is consistent with the General Plan Update, involves renovating an existing 5,837-square foot building and developing outdoor open space areas on an approximately 0.9-acre site. The project would meet the development density requirement for the FLEX-1.5 designation and thus, was considered in the planned development of the General Plan Update and would have similar or lesser significant impacts than analyzed in the GPU EIR. As discussed in Section 4.0, there are no project specific impacts which the GPU EIR failed to analyze as significant effects. The proposed project is consistent with Criterion C. d) There are no potentially significant off-site and/or cumulative impacts which the prior EIR failed to evaluate.

As stated, buildout of the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan Update and thus, was considered in the GPU EIR analysis. No off-site improvements are proposed in the project area and the size and nature of the project would not result in cumulatively considerable environmental impacts. Overall, there are no potentially significant off-site and/or cumulative impacts which the GPU EIR failed to evaluate. The project is consistent with Criterion D. e) There is no substantial new information which results in more severe impacts than anticipated by the prior EIR.

As discussed in Section 4.0, the proposed project would result in similar and/or lesser impacts than the GPU EIR. There is no substantial new information which result in more severe impacts than anticipated by the GPU EIR. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with Criterion E.

As shown, the proposed project is consistent with Criteria A through E under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. As such, the proposed project qualifies for the CEQA exemption.

City Council 26 – 119 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 60

REFERENCES
Berger, Elliott H., et al., Noise Navigator Sound Level Database with Over 1700 Measurement Values, June 26, 2015.

California Air Resources Board, 2022 Scoping Plan, November 16, 2022.

California Air Resources Board, Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, April 2005.

California Air Resources Board, Air Quality and Meteorological Information, https://www.arb.ca.gov/aqmis2/aqdselect.php?tab=specialrpt, accessed July 3, 2023.

California Department of Conservation, California Important Farmland Finder, https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/, accessed June 29, 2023.

California Department of Conservation, California Williamson Act Enrollment Finder, https://gis.conservation.ca.gov/portal/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=18f7488c0a9 d4d299f5e9c33b312f312, accessed July 26, 2023.

California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology, A General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California – Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring Asbestos Report, August 2000, https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/toxics/asbestos/ofr_2000-019.pdf, accessed April 3, 2023.

California Department of Transportation, Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, September 2013.

California Department of Transportation, Transportation and Construction Vibration Manual, April 2020.

California Environmental Protection Agency, Cortese Listing, https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/, accessed July 6, 2023.

CalRecycle, Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates,
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastecharacterization/general/rates, accessed August 10, 2023.

CalRecycle, Green Building Materials,
https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/greenbuilding/materials#Material, accessed August 15, 2023.

California Natural Resources Agency, Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action, pp. 11- 13, 14, 16, December 2009,
https://resources.ca.gov/CNRALegacyFiles/ceqa/docs/Final_Statement_of_Reasons.pdf , accessed July 13, 2023.

City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana Climate Action Plan, December 2015.

City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana Traffic Impact Study Guidelines, September 2019.

City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana Zoning Map, March 4, 2021.

City Council 26 – 120 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 61
City of Santa Ana, Golden City Beyond, Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element, Figure LU1, Land Use Map, April 2022.

City of Santa Ana, City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element, https://storage.googleapis.com/proudcity/santaanaca/uploads/2022/04/CirculationElement.pdf, accessed on July 28, 2023.

City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana Municipal Code, codified through Ordinance No. NS-3049, adopted July 18, 2023.

Cyril M. Harris, Noise Control in Buildings, 1994.

Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA-HEP-05-054), January 2006.

International Code Council, 2022 California Building Code, Title 24, Part 2, https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/CABC2022P1/chapter-18-soils-and-foundations, accessed July 26, 2023.

Kariel, H. G., Noise in Rural Recreational Environments, Canadian Acoustics 19(5), 3-10, 1991.

M.J. Hayne, et al, Prediction of Crowd Noise, Acoustics, November 2006.

South Coast Air Quality Management District, Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold, October 2008.

South Coast Air Quality Management District, Health Risk Assessment Guidance for Analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Emissions, December 2002.

South Coast Air Quality Management District, Rule 1113 Architectural Coatings, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg-xi/r1113.pdf, accessed June 15, 2023.

Southern California Association of Governments, 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy – Connect SoCal, September 3, 2020.

State of California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, Transmittal of the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research’s Proposed SB97 CEQA Guidelines Amendments to the Natural Resources Agency, April 13, 2009,
https://planning.lacity.org/eir/CrossroadsHwd/deir/files/references/C01.pdf, accessed July 13, 2023.

Urban Crossroads, Inc., Vista Heritage Global Academy Expansion Trip Generation Assessment, July 24, 2023.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Corps reclassifies Prado Damn, implements risk-reduction measures, https://www.spl.usace.army.mil/Media/News-Releases/Article/1849301/corpsreclassifies-prado-dam-implements-risk-reduction-measures/, May 15, 2019.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Carbon Monoxide Emissions, https://cfpub.epa.gov/roe/indicator_pdf.cfm?i=10, accessed July 3, 2023.

City Council 26 – 121 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183
December 2023 Page 62
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey, https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx, accessed July 26, 2023.

City Council 26 – 122 1/16/2024
Vista Charter Public Schools District Office and Outdoor Space Project CEQA Exemption 15183

ATTACHMENT A AIR QUALITY/GREENHOUSE GAS/ENERGY MODELING RESULTS City Council 26 – 123 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 1 / 63
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated

3.2. Building Construction (2023) - Mitigated
City Council 26 – 124 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 2 / 63

3.3. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.4. Building Construction (2024) - Mitigated

3.5. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated

3.6. Paving (2024) - Mitigated

3.7. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated

3.8. Architectural Coating (2024) - Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated
City Council 26 – 125 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 3 / 63

4.3.1. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.4.1. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.5.1. Mitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.8.2. Mitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
City Council 26 – 126 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 4 / 63

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.9.2. Mitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.2.2. Mitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.3.2. Mitigated
City Council 26 – 127 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 5 / 63

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
City Council 26 – 128 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 6 / 63

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.12.2. Mitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources
City Council 26 – 129 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 7 / 63

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2.2. Mitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
City Council 26 – 130 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 8 / 63

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

7.6. Health & Equity Custom Measures

8. User Changes to Default Data
City Council 26 – 131 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 9 / 63

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Vista Charter School Expansion
Construction Start Date 11/1/2023
Operational Year 2024
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.50
Precipitation (days) 18.6
Location Santa Ana, CA, USA
County Orange
City Santa Ana
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5990
EDFZ 7
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.14

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
City Council 26 – 132 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 10 / 63
General Office
Building

7.00 1000sqft 0.16 7,000 2,297 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure Title
Construction C-10-C Water Unpaved Construction Roads
Construction C-11 Limit Vehicle Speeds on Unpaved Roads Construction C-12 Sweep Paved Roads

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.70 0.89 4.59 6.38 0.01 0.21 0.23 0.44 0.19 0.05 0.25 — 1,061 1,061 0.04 0.01 0.97 1,067 Mit. 0.70 0.89 4.59 6.38 0.01 0.21 0.23 0.44 0.19 0.05 0.25 — 1,061 1,061 0.04 0.01 0.97 1,067 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.71 0.59 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.28 0.23 0.44 0.26 0.05 0.27 — 1,372 1,372 0.06 0.02 0.03 1,378 Mit. 0.71 0.59 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.28 0.23 0.44 0.26 0.05 0.27 — 1,372 1,372 0.06 0.02 0.03 1,378 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Council 26 – 133 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 11 / 63
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
(Max)
Unmit. 0.18 0.24 1.31 1.71 < 0.005 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.06 — 301 301 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 303 Mit. 0.18 0.24 1.31 1.71 < 0.005 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.06 — 301 301 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 303 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.03 0.04 0.24 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 — 49.9 49.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 50.1 Mit. 0.03 0.04 0.24 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 — 49.9 49.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 50.1 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.70 0.89 4.59 6.38 0.01 0.21 0.23 0.44 0.19 0.05 0.25 — 1,061 1,061 0.04 0.01 0.97 1,067 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.71 0.59 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.28 0.04 0.32 0.26 0.01 0.27 — 1,372 1,372 0.06 0.02 0.01 1,378 2024 0.70 0.59 5.65 7.11 0.01 0.26 0.23 0.44 0.24 0.05 0.25 — 1,371 1,371 0.06 0.02 0.03 1,377 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.08 0.07 0.71 0.85 < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 0.04 0.03 < 0.005 0.03 — 164 164 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 165 2024 0.18 0.24 1.31 1.71 < 0.005 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.06 — 301 301 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 303 Annual — City Council — — — — — — — 26 – 134— — — — — — — 1/16/2024 — — — Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 12 / 63
2023 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.16 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 — 27.1 27.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 27.2 2024 0.03 0.04 0.24 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 — 49.9 49.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 50.1

2.3. Construction Emissions by Year, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2024 0.70 0.89 4.59 6.38 0.01 0.21 0.23 0.44 0.19 0.05 0.25 — 1,061 1,061 0.04 0.01 0.97 1,067 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.71 0.59 5.98 7.14 0.01 0.28 0.04 0.32 0.26 0.01 0.27 — 1,372 1,372 0.06 0.02 0.01 1,378 2024 0.70 0.59 5.65 7.11 0.01 0.26 0.23 0.44 0.24 0.05 0.25 — 1,371 1,371 0.06 0.02 0.03 1,377 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.08 0.07 0.71 0.85 < 0.005 0.03 < 0.005 0.04 0.03 < 0.005 0.03 — 164 164 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 165 2024 0.18 0.24 1.31 1.71 < 0.005 0.06 0.03 0.09 0.05 0.01 0.06 — 301 301 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 303 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.02 0.01 0.13 0.16 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 — 27.1 27.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 27.2 2024 0.03 0.04 0.24 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 0.01 — 49.9 49.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 50.1

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Council 26 – 135 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 13 / 63
Unmit. 0.35 0.49 0.23 2.30 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 709 715 0.64 0.03 1.87 741 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.30 0.44 0.24 1.89 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 691 696 0.64 0.03 0.07 721 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.26 0.40 0.20 1.66 < 0.005 0.01 0.30 0.31 0.01 0.08 0.08 5.89 585 591 0.63 0.02 0.62 614 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.98 96.8 97.8 0.10 < 0.005 0.10 102

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.29 0.27 0.18 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 — 457 457 0.02 0.02 1.86 465 Area 0.05 0.22 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.26 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 — 240 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 — 22.8 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 — 12.3 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total 0.35 0.49 0.23 2.30 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 709 715 0.64 0.03 1.87 741 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.29 0.27 0.20 1.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 — 439 439 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 City Council 26 – 136 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 14 / 63
Area — 0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 — 240 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 — 22.8 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 — 12.3 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total 0.30 0.44 0.24 1.89 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 691 696 0.64 0.03 0.07 721 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.22 0.20 0.15 1.41 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 — 333 333 0.02 0.01 0.60 338 Area 0.04 0.20 < 0.005 0.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.86 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.86 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 — 240 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 — 22.8 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 — 12.3 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total 0.26 0.40 0.20 1.66 < 0.005 0.01 0.30 0.31 0.01 0.08 0.08 5.89 585 591 0.63 0.02 0.62 614 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 55.1 55.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 56.0 Area 0.01 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.14 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 39.5 39.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.7 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.39 2.08 2.48 0.04 < 0.005 — 3.78 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 0.58 0.00 0.58 0.06 0.00 — 2.03 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 Total 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.98 96.8 97.8 0.10 < 0.005 0.10 102

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e City Council 26 – 137 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 15 / 63
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.29 0.27 0.18 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 — 457 457 0.02 0.02 1.86 465 Area 0.05 0.22 < 0.005 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.25 1.25 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.26 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 — 240 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 — 22.8 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 — 12.3 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total 0.35 0.49 0.23 2.30 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 709 715 0.64 0.03 1.87 741 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.29 0.27 0.20 1.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 — 439 439 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 Area — 0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 — 240 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 — 22.8 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 — 12.3 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total 0.30 0.44 0.24 1.89 < 0.005 0.01 0.40 0.41 0.01 0.10 0.11 5.89 691 696 0.64 0.03 0.07 721 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.22 0.20 0.15 1.41 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 0.08 0.08 — 333 333 0.02 0.01 0.60 338 Area 0.04 0.20 < 0.005 0.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.86 0.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.86 Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 239 239 0.02 < 0.005 — 240 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 2.38 12.6 15.0 0.25 0.01 — 22.8 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3.51 0.00 3.51 0.35 0.00 — 12.3 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0.02 0.02
Total 0.26 0.40 0.20 1.66 < 0.005 0.01 0.30 0.31 0.01 0.08 0.08 5.89 585 591 0.63 0.02 0.62 614 City Council 26 – 138 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 16 / 63
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 55.1 55.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 56.0 Area 0.01 0.04 < 0.005 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.14 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.14 Energy < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 39.5 39.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 39.7 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 0.39 2.08 2.48 0.04 < 0.005 — 3.78 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 0.58 0.00 0.58 0.06 0.00 — 2.03 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 Total 0.05 0.07 0.04 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 0.98 96.8 97.8 0.10 < 0.005 0.10 102

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.69 0.58 5.93 7.00 0.01 0.28 — 0.28 0.26 — 0.26 — 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.07 0.71 0.84 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 156 156 0.01 < 0.005 — 156 City Council 26 – 139 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 17 / 63
Onsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 truck
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.01 0.13 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 25.8 25.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 25.9 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 29.5 29.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 29.8 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 37.6 37.6 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 39.2 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.57 3.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.62 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.49 4.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.68 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.59 0.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.60 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.74 0.74 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.78 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.2. Building Construction (2023) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e City Council 26 – 140 1/16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 18 / 63
Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.69 0.58 5.93 7.00 0.01 0.28 — 0.28 0.26 — 0.26 — 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.07 0.71 0.84 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 156 156 0.01 < 0.005 — 156 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.01 0.13 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 25.8 25.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 25.9 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 29.5 29.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 29.8 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 37.6 37.6 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 39.2 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 City Council 26 – 141 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 19 / 63
Average — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.57 3.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.62 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.49 4.49 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.68 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.59 0.59 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.60 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.74 0.74 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.78 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.67 0.56 5.60 6.98 0.01 0.26 — 0.26 0.23 — 0.23 — 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.07 0.66 0.82 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 153 153 0.01 < 0.005 — 154 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — City Council — — — — — — — 26 – 142— — — — — — — 1/16/2024 — — — Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 20 / 63
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.12 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 25.4 25.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 25.5 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 29.2 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 37.2 37.2 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 38.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.44 3.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.48 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.36 4.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.55 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.57 0.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.58 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.72 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.75 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.4. Building Construction (2024) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Council 26 – 143 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 21 / 63
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.67 0.56 5.60 6.98 0.01 0.26 — 0.26 0.23 — 0.23 — 1,305 1,305 0.05 0.01 — 1,309 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.08 0.07 0.66 0.82 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 153 153 0.01 < 0.005 — 154 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.12 0.15 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 25.4 25.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 25.5 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 28.9 28.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 29.2 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 37.2 37.2 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 38.8 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Council 26 – 144 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 22 / 63
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.44 3.44 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.48 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.36 4.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.55 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.57 0.57 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.58 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.72 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.75 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.63 0.53 4.52 5.32 0.01 0.21 — 0.21 0.19 — 0.19 — 823 823 0.03 0.01 — 826 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.63 0.53 4.52 5.32 0.01 0.21 — 0.21 0.19 — 0.19 — 823 823 0.03 0.01 — 826 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Council 26 – 145 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 23 / 63
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.53 0.63 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 97.0 97.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 97.3 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.10 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 16.1 16.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.1 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 237 237 < 0.005 0.01 0.97 241 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 226 226 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 228 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 27.0 27.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 27.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 City Council < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 26 – 1460.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.46 4.46 < 0.0051/16/2024 < 0.005 0.01 4.52 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 24 / 63
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.6. Paving (2024) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.63 0.53 4.52 5.32 0.01 0.21 — 0.21 0.19 — 0.19 — 823 823 0.03 0.01 — 826 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.63 0.53 4.52 5.32 0.01 0.21 — 0.21 0.19 — 0.19 — 823 823 0.03 0.01 — 826 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.07 0.06 0.53 0.63 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 97.0 97.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 97.3 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Council 26 – 147 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 25 / 63
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.10 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 16.1 16.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 16.1 Paving — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.07 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 237 237 < 0.005 0.01 0.97 241 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.07 0.06 0.08 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 226 226 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 228 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 27.0 27.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 27.3 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.46 4.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.52 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) City Council 26 – 148 1/16/2024 Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 26 / 63
Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.17 0.14 0.91 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.11 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 15.7 15.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 15.8 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.60 2.60 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.61 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Council 26 – 149 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 27 / 63
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.07 6.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 6.16 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.69 0.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.70 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.11 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.8. Architectural Coating (2024) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.17 0.14 0.91 1.15 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 — 134 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Council 26 – 150 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 28 / 63
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.07 6.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 6.16 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
City Council 26 – 151 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 29 / 63
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.69 0.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.70 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.11 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building

0.29 0.27 0.18 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 — 457 457 0.02 0.02 1.86 465 Total 0.29 0.27 0.18 1.95 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 — 457 457 0.02 0.02 1.86 465 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building

0.29 0.27 0.20 1.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 — 439 439 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 Total 0.29 0.27 0.20 1.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 — 439 439 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 Annual — City Council — — — — — — — 26 – 152— — — — — — — 1/16/2024 — — — Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 30 / 63
General
Office
Building

0.04 0.04 0.03 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 55.1 55.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 56.0 Total 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.26 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 55.1 55.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 56.0

4.1.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building

0.29 0.27 0.20 1.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 — 439 439 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 Total 0.29 0.27 0.20 1.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.40 0.41 < 0.005 0.10 0.11 — 439 439 0.03 0.02 0.05 446 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
City Council 26 – 153 1/16/2024
Vista Charter School Expansion Detailed Report, 7/26/2023 31 / 63
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 — 182
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 — 182 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 — 182
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 182 182 0.01 < 0.005 — 182 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
General
Office
Building
— — — — — — — — — — — — 30.1 30.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.2 Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 30.1 30.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.2

Santa Ana City CouncilJanuary 16, 2024

Santa Ana City Council
January 16, 2024