Santa Ana City Council
March 19, 2024

Flores, Dora
From: Jeffrey Katz
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2024 4:35 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Agenda Item #24 on the March 19, 2024 Calendar Attachments: 24-03-14 - Letter to Council re Targeting Ordinance.pdf On behalf of the Floral Park Neighborhood Association, please enter the attached letter into the record for the upcoming Regular City Council meeting to be convened on March 19, 2024.

FLORAL PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION
Jeffrey A. Katz | President
Santa Ana, CA 92706
Direct Dial:

Email:

TARA PIRA

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION
Via Email: [email protected]
March 14, 2024
Mayor and Council Members of Santa Ana
22 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Re: Agenda Item #24 on the March 19, 2024 Calendar
Ordinance Establishing Distance Requirements for Targeted Residential Picketing Dear Hon. Mayor and Council Members:

In the timeless wisdom of the Supreme Court's decision of Carey v. Brown, resides a fundamental truth: the sanctity of the home is sacrosanct. It is the fortress of tranquility, the bastion of peace, the haven where individuals seek solace from the tumult of the world. It is within these hallowed walls that families nurture, dream, and find respite from the rigors of daily existence. Such an essential refuge must be safeguarded from undue intrusion and disruption.

Thus, it is with great urgency and conviction that the board of the Floral Park Neighborhood Association implores this Council to consider and adopt the proposed ordinance prohibiting targeted residential picketing within our community.

Our neighborhood has regrettably become the unfortunate stage for a series of disruptive and distressing protests. These demonstrations, characterized by blaring sirens, raucous bullhorns, and incessant drumming, have not only violated the peace and quietude of our streets but have directly targeted a singular neighbor to the detriment of all nearby residents.

In the eloquent words of the Supreme Court, the well-being, tranquility, and privacy of the home are indeed of the highest order in a free and civilized society. As such, it is imperative that measures be taken to preserve these cherished values. The proposed ordinance aligns with established legal principles, recognizing that while the freedom of speech is a bedrock of our democracy, it must be exercised responsibly and with due regard for the rights and well-being of others.

In the landmark case of Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 791 (1989), the Supreme Court affirmed that governments may impose reasonable restrictions on the time, place, or manner of protected speech, provided such restrictions are justified by significant governmental interests and do not unduly infringe upon alternative channels of communication. The ordinance under consideration meets these criteria, serving to protect the sanctity of the home while still allowing ample avenues for the expression of ideas and opinions.

In recent months, we have witnessed a troubling erosion of civility within the confines of City Hall chamber. That behavior has now spilled on to the residential streets of our city. The adoption of this ordinance represents a critical first step in restoring civility and respect for our fellow citizens, both in public discourse and private life. It sends a clear message that our community values the well-being and dignity of all its residents and will not tolerate behavior that undermines these principles.

We commend the City Council for its commitment to upholding the rights and dignity of all residents of Santa Ana. By enacting this ordinance, you will not only defend the peace and tranquility of our neighborhood but also reaffirm the values of respect, civility, and community that are the hallmarks of our society.

In conclusion, we urge you to stand on the side of decency and justice by adopting the proposed ordinance prohibiting targeted residential picketing. Let us ensure that our residential neighborhoods remain havens of peace and refuge.

Sincerely,
/s/
Jeffrey Katz
FPNA President
cc: City Manager
FPNA Board of Directors
Floral Park Neighbors
Flores, Dora
From: Amber Matas
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 6:25 AM
To: eComment
Subject: Agenda Item #24
Good morning,
As a long time Santa Ana resident, I am writing to voice support for council passing an ordinance that aims to prohibit protests that target an individual at his or her private residence. This ordinance is intended to preserve the peace and privacy of our neighborhood while still respecting the rights of individuals to express their opinions.

Thank you,
Amber Matas
Santa Ana CA 92706
Flores, Dora
From: Monday March 18. 2024824 AM Karen OCallaghan |
Sent:

To: eComment
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Agenda Item #24, March 19, 2024 - Targeted Picketing Ordinance Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Re: Agenda Item #24 on the March 19, 2024 Calendar - Ordinance Establishing Distance Requirements for Targeted Residential Picketing
Dear Hon. Mayor and Council Members:

Regrettably, 1 am unable to attend the City Council meeting on March 19th however, it is important that my voice be heard regarding Agenda Item #24.

As a resident on the corner of North Park Blvd and Benton Way, I have unfortunately been subjected to numerous protest demonstrations. These gatherings sometimes start as early as 6:30 am on weekends, inundating my home and neighbors with deafening noise from relentless shouting, bullhorns, drums, and sirens.

While I wholeheartedly support the fundamental right to demonstrate and protest as protected under our First Amendment, I vehemently oppose allowing such activities to occur mere feet away from my private residence. This proximity leaves me feeling unsafe and unsettled, transforming my home from a sanctuary into a place of anxiety and fear.

I strongly urge the City Council to consider and enact the proposed ordinance aimed at regulating residential picketing. It is my hope that this measure will restore peace and tranquility to my neighborhood and return our homes back to places of safety and refuge.

Thank you,
Karen O'Callaghan
Santa Ana
2 Flores, Dora
From: Cheryl Conradson <
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 12:27 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Neighborhood disruptions
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

I hope our City Council recognizes the dangers and the intrusions into neighbors lives. A persons home is sacred and if there are concerns, put them in writing and send them to the person or parties. I saw the group crossing the street at Broadway and Santa Clara early Sunday morning. They walked caring their flags in unity. Everyone is entitled to their religious beliefs. We need to respect each other and not cross the boundaries. Santa Ana needs to step up and protect our neighbors and neighborhoods. If it happened to anyone on the council, they would insist on protection. Do the RIGHT thing tonight.

Sincerely,
Cheryl Conradson
Santa Ana. 92706
Flores, Dora
From: Flores, Gaston
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 1:37 PM
To: eComment
Subject: FW: Contact the City Council Submission
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 12:52 PM
To: Flores, Gaston <[email protected]>
Subject: Contact the City Council Submission
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Name
Danett Abbott-Wicker
Email
Address
ORANGE, California 92865
United States
Map It
Phone
Who is this message for?
• Mayor Valerie Amezcua
• Mayor Pro Tem Thai Viet Phan
Councilmember Benjamin Vazquez
Councilmember Jessie Lopez
: Councilmember Phil Bacerra
• Councilmember Johnathan Ryan Hernandez
• Councilmember David Penaloza
Comments or questions
On Tuesday, you will be discussing an urgency ordinance to forbid protest within 300 feet of a residence. This is outrageous and a real eroding of First Amendment rights! You need to unequivocally reject this proposal.

Long Beach recently rejected a similar proposal and stood up for the American right to peaceful assembly. 1 Flores, Dora
From: Kelli Corona +
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 2:32 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Agenda Item #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Good afternoon,
I am sending this email because I am appalled at this agenda item. It must be voted against. This is repugnant and anti-democratic. If city council attempts to restrict the right to peacefully protest and violates our fundamental ist amendment right it will not be respected and it will incur more protest which is your citizens' prerogative. If representatives are unwilling to hear dissenting opinions and for page ic the vie exercising thie dit aly step doli. his a groes they din gre hen they are unfit If you are not fit to be a leader then do not choose to be one. I am a lifetime resident of Santa Ana, currently residing in Ward 5. This is completely unacceptable. Whichever council members put this on the agenda should be ashamed, lambasted, and not seek reelection.

In earnest,
Kelli Corona
2 Flores, Dora
From: Rebecca Pasillas
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 2:55 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Item #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Hello Council,
My name is Rebecca and strongly oppose item 24. This ordinance is a blatant attack on our first amendment rights. You were elected to do the job of representing constituents. By allowing this to pass you are misrepresenting and setting up a pathway to authoritarianism. Instead, you should be meeting with your constituents to discuss solutions that are causing protests. This country was founded on the right to protest anc to vote against it is undemocratic.

Thank you,
Rebecca Pasillas
3 Flores, Dora
From: Michelle Donahue •
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 4:24 PM
To: eComment
Subject: agenda item #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Dear City Council members,
My husband and I live in Floral Park in Santa Ana. Though the protests of Lou Correa have not disrupted us, we feel there has been a line crossed on what should be acceptable in a residential neighborhood. The loud noises are meant to be a menace to the community and should be confined to a particular time of day if they happen at a private residence at all. The protestors seem very disinclined to have a conversation whatsoever. While I value the freedom to protest in America, this goes beyond what a noise ordinance should allow.

Please consider creating some guidelines here.

Thank you,
Michelle Donahue

MICHELLE DONAHUE COME

SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF SALES
D.

Visit Newport Beach
Newport Beach, CA 92660
VisitNewportBeach.com
Flores, Dora
From: Leonel Flores
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 3:17 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Agenda Item 24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Good Afternoon,
My name is Leonel Flores and I am writing in opposition of agenda item 24. This is a violation of our constitutional rights, and there will be detrimental legal repercussions that will affect our city. Please vote no on agenda item 14.

Thank you,
6 Flores, Dora
From: Ciomara Franco •
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 5:58 PM
To: eComment
Subject: No on Agenda item #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Hello,
I'd like to voice my opinion on the matter of Agenda Item #24. This proposal to enact an emergency ordinance to restrict residents in residential areas to protest is alarming. We must act to oppose this ordinance since it directly sets a dangerous precedent across the city and county. Our right to protest is fundamental to Democracy and we cannot allow it to be undermined. Protest is not a crime! NO to Agenda Item #24!! A concerned resident,
Ciomara Franco
5 Flores, Dora
From: kendee hamilton
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 7:16 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Council meeting
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

I would like to be added to the city council agenda tomorrow March 19 to give a comment about agenda item #24.

Please let me know if you need any further information from me.

Thank you,
Kendee Hamilton
Flores, Dora
From: Jennifer Lopez -
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 7:17 PM
To: eComment
Subject: City council meeting 3/19
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Good afternoon,
I am writing in opposition of agenda item #24 which infringes on residents rights.

You cannot limit our free speech and self expression especially when congressman Lou Correa likes to market himself as a man of the people.

We are your constituents and refuse to fund an authoritarian ordinance. 3 Flores, Dora
From: Alexis Serrato
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 7:41 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Public Comment : Agenda Item #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Good evening Santa Ana City Council -
I am writing in a comment today for Agenda Item #24. I am deeply disappointed that this is even on the agenda today.

Lou Correa knew that becoming an elected official would mean that he would have to listen to the citizens that voted for him. He refuses to show any interest in having a conversation on issues that we feel are important. Just because he has chosen to listen to his greed & not listen to his community does not mean that he gets to violate our 1st amendment right to protest simply because he's been "inconvenienced." I am asking that our elected city council members vote to protect our rights. Please don't make the same mistake that you did your "media rule" that also violated our right to free Thank you for your time.
#FREEPALESTINE
2 Flores, Dora
From:

Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 8:00 PM
To: eComment
Subject: pass ordinance to prohibit protests at private residence Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Dear City Council,
We urge you to pass the ordinance that will prohibit protests targeting an individual at their private residence. The ongoing protests in our Floral Park neighborhood have been disturbing, disruptive and incredibly stressful.

Thank you,
Terri and David Brown
Flores, Dora
From: Julia Gomez d
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 8:19 PM
To: Comment
Cc: Amezcua, Valerie; Lopez, Jessie; Phan, Thai; Vazquez, Benjamin; Bacerra, Phil Hernandez, Johnathan; Penaloza, David; Carvalho, Sonia R.; Jonathan Markovitz Subject: Public Comment re March 19 City Council Meeting, Item 24 Attachments: 2024.03.18 ACLU Letter to Santa Ana re Item No. 24 Draft Picketing Ordinance.pdf Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Attached please find public comment from the ACLU of Southern California regarding Item No. 24 (targeted residential picketing ordinance.

Best,
Julia
Julia Gomez, Staff Attorney
ACLU of Southern California
Los Angeles, CA 90017
(0)/
aclusocal.org I| facebook II twitter I| blog I| app
ACLU SoCal: STAND FOR JUSTICE >> Download our mobile app at mobilejusticeca.org

THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF THE READER OF THIS

MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THE MESSAGE TO THE

INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS ACLU

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION

FOUNDATION
Southern California
Sent via email
March 18, 2024
Santa Ana Mayor and City Council
City Council Chamber
22 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
[email protected]
Re: March 19, 2024 City Council Agenda, Item No. 24
Opposition to Adoption of Residential Picketing Ordinance Dear Mayor Amezcua and Members of the Santa Ana City Council:

The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California is concerned with an ordinance listed as Item No. 24 on the March 19 agenda which, if adopted, would prohibit targeted picketing within 300 feet of a residential dwelling and would impose up to a $1,000 fine and/or up to six months in jail ("draft ordinance"). The draft ordinance comes on the heels of robust public discourse and protests by Santa Ana residents urging the Mayor, Councilmembers, and Congressman Lou Correa to call for a ceasefire of Israel's war on Gaza. In fact, the preamble to the urgency ordinance confirms that it is intended, at least in part, to insulate the Congressman from ongoing pro-Palestinian protests that are critical of his positions and actions. Although the ordinance will force protesters to move nearly an entire football field or full city block away from the Congressman's home, inhibiting their First Amendment rights, it will not stop protests altogether. Instead, it will merely ensure that Congressman Correa's neighbors are subject to hearing protestors' complaints that are intended for the Congressman, whose residence will likely not be in earshot of the protests. Equally concerning is the fact that, if adopted, the ordinance will be one of the most restrictive targeted residential protest laws in the Country. We therefore urge you to vote against this extreme attempt to curb free speech.

A public street is a traditional public forum where picketing enjoys First Amendment protections, and it does not lose this status "simply because [the street] runs through a residential neighborhood." Frisby v. Schultz, 487 U.S 474, 480 (1988). Instead, courts have emphasized that these protections extend to targeted residential picketing. Klein v. San Diego Cnty., 463 F.3d 1029, 103636 n.5 (9th Cir. 2006). This is because the "right to residential privacy does not encompass a right to remain blissfully unaware of the presence of picketers." Id.; see also Murray v. Lawson, 138 N.J. 206, 232-33 (1994) (in striking down 300-foot restriction, observing that keeping picketers "at such a great distance, thereby rendering [the residents'] awareness of the picketing most unlikely as a practical matter, is unnecessary to protect [the] residential- EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Hector O. Villagra
CHAIR Stacy Horth-Neubert VICE CHAIR Rob Hennig
CHAIRS EMERITI Michele Goodwin Marla Stone Shari Leinwand Stephen Rohde Danny Goldberg Allan K. Jonas* Burt Lancaster* Irving Lichtenstein, MD* Jarl Mohn Laurie Ostrow* Stanley K. Sheinbaum* *deceased
ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE • 765 THE CITY DRIVE, SUITE 360 • ORANGE, CA 92868 • T 714.450.3962 • F 714.583.8046 • ACLUSOCAL.ORG Santa Ana Mayor and City Council
March 18, 2024 Page 2
privacy interest"). The First Amendment exists precisely to ensure "the unfettered interchange of ideas for the bringing about of political and social changes desired by the people," and targeted residential protests of elected officials fall squarely within this purpose. See New York Times v.

Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 269 (1964) (there exists a "profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials").

Santa Ana residents have previously engaged in targeted residential protests of elected officials without a suppressive response from the Council. In 2016, for example, following an unsuccessful hunger strike calling on the City Council not to extend the City's contract with U.S.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement, protesters ended their strike in front of then- Councilmember Vicente Sarmiento's home.' Since October, Santa Ana residents who want an end to Israel's war on Gaza have similarly exercised their First Amendment rights by engaging in targeted residential and commercial protests. On February 22, protesters picketed in front of the Ebell Club where Mayor Amezcua was hosting a reelection campaign fundraiser, calling on the Mayor to support a ceasefire resolution. Although Mayor Amezcua purportedly called law enforcement to the scene, there were no arrests or altercations. Protests in front of Congressman Correa's home calling for support for a ceasefire have also been ongoing. As stated in the urgency ordinance, it is only in response to these recent actions espousing pro-Palestinian views that the Council has now introduced an ordinance to severely limit residential picketing.

The agendizing of the ordinance in response to ongoing residential protests raises an inference that the measure is intended to stifle expression of a political viewpoint that the Mayor and some members of the Council may disagree with, but laws that discriminate based on viewpoint are unconstitutional. Police Dep't of City of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 96 (1972) ("under the Equal Protection Clause, not to mention the First Amendment itself, government may not grant the use of a forum to people whose views it finds acceptable, but deny use to those wishing to express less favored or more controversial views"). Even if a law is content-neutral on its face, the law may nonetheless be unconstitutional if it is in fact "a facade for viewpoint-based discrimination." Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense and Educ. Fund, Inc., 473 U.S. 788, 811 (1985); Reed v. Town of Gilbert, Ariz., 576 U.S.155, 166 (2015) (noting that a "content-based purpose may be sufficient... to show that a regulation" discriminates based on viewpoint) (internal quotation marks omitted). Here, the introduction of the proposed ordinance to address two ceasefire protests coupled with other actions by the Mayor and some ' See, Jessica Kwong, Santa Ana Moves to Ease Out of ICE Contract for Jail Detainees; Transgender Study Planned, The OC Register (May 18, 2016), https://www.ocregister.com/2016/05/18/santa-ana-moves-to-ease-out- of-ice-contract-for-jail-detainees-transgender-study-planned/; Orange County Immigrant Youth United, We're Officially Ending the Hunger Strike in Front of Congressman Vince Sarmiento's House. This Isn't an End to Our Efforts..., Facebook (May 19, 2016), https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=10154338286001264 2 The urgency ordinance was drafted at least in part to respond to the February 22 Ebell Club protest and a February 24 protest in front of Congressman Correa's home. No other protests targeting either residences or commercial buildings located near residences are cited. See City Council Agenda Packet for March 19, 2024 Meeting at 24-5. 3 Santa Ana residents have also raised concerns that the Mayor has limited public comments in support of a ceasefire resolution and in support of an ethics investigation related to the proposed resolution. During the December 19, 2023 meeting, for example, the Mayor called for a recess following ceasefire chants. After a recess, the meeting resumed, but the Mayor refused to re-open the meeting to allow members of the public to provide comment either in person or through Zoom. See Brandon Pho, Santa Ana City Council Kicks Public Out of Meeting After Ceasefire Chants, The Voice of OC (Dec. 20, 2023), https://voiceofoc.org/2023/12/santa-ana-city-council-kicks-public-out-of-meeting- after-ceasefire-chants/.

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Santa Ana Mayor and City Council
March 18, 2024 Page 3
councilmembers raises serious concerns that the intent behind the ordinance is to discriminate against pro-Palestinian speech.

The distance requirement imposed by the draft ordinance is also concerning.

Congressman Correa's home is surrounded by a tall fence and dense greenery. Requiring protesters to picket nearly a football field away from the Congressman's home will largely insulate him—but not his neighbors—from the protesters. The draft ordinance includes the same restrictions as the ordinance at issue in Klein, and the ordinance's likely impact on the Correa protests mirrors concerns that the Ninth Circuit raised with 300-foot restrictions more broadly.

Although the court in Klein held that San Diego County's ordinance was facially constitutional, i.e., not unconstitutional in every conceivable application, it acknowledged that the ordinance was nonetheless problematic. Id. at 1031, 1036. Among the many issues, the ordinance did not include more limited restrictions on speech. Id. at 1036. The ordinance was also problematic because it had a one-size-fits-all approach that allowed picketing at the property line for large lots with homes that were set back but, as is the case with protests directed at Congressman Correa, forced picketers several lots away from their target audience in neighborhoods with smaller lots. Id.

The San Diego County ordinance was also a lot more restrictive than targeted residential picketing laws upheld by other courts. Id. The Eighth Circuit, for example, upheld an ordinance in Douglas v. Brownell, 88 F.3d 1511, 1520-21 (8th Cir. 1996), that banned picketing directly in front of a targeted residence but permitted picketing across the street. That same year, the Eighth Circuit struck down a ban that prohibited picketing within 200 feet of a targeted residence Kirkeby v. Furness, 92 F.3d 655, 660 (8th Cir. 1996). Other courts have also banned restrictions over 200 feet. See, e.g., Murray, 138 N.J. at 232-33 (banning a 300-foot restriction). The draft ordinance, like the San Diego ordinance, is thus on the more extreme and restrictive end of residential picketing laws that courts have upheld. The draft ordinance is particularly concerning in a city like Santa Ana, where the City Council has historically shown a commitment to civil rights and liberties by adopting progressive policies following robust public discourse. There is no reason why Santa Ana should have more restrictive protest laws than Arkansas, a state in the Eighth Circuit that is not known for its respect for civil liberties.

While the proposed ordinance may be likely to survive a facial constitutional challenge i ourt, it is less likely to survive an as-applied challenge and there is strong evidence of viewpoin discrimination. Councilmembers should also consider whether stifling speech in this way aligns vith the City's values. We believe that the draft ordinance does not align with Santa Ana's 'alues and urge the Mayor and the Council to reject the ordinance. If you would like to discus [email protected].

Sincerely,
Jonatan Markovitz Julia A. Gomez
Free Expression and Access to Senior Staff Attorney
Government Staff Attorney

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Santa Ana Mayor and City Council
March 18, 2024 Page 4
Cc: Valerie Amezcua, Mayor, [email protected]
Jessie Lopez, Mayor Pro Tem, [email protected]
Thai Viet Phan, Councilmember, [email protected]
Benjamin Vazquez, Councilmember, [email protected] Phil Bacerra, Councilmember, [email protected]
Jonathan Ryan Hernandez, Councilmember, [email protected] David Penaloza, Councilmember, [email protected]
Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney, [email protected]

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Flores, Dora
From: ZeyroXIll <
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 8:20 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Public comment: agentem item #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Good evening Santa Ana City Council -
I am writing in a comment today for Agenda Item #24. I am deeply disappointed that this is even on the agenda today. Lou Correa knew that becoming an elected official would mean that he would have to listen to the citizens that voted for him. He refuses to show any interest in having a conversation on issues that we feel are important. Just because he has chosen to listen to his greed & not listen to his community does not mean that he gets to violate our 1st amendment right to protest simply because he's been "inconvenienced." I am asking that our elected city council members vote to protect our rights. Please don't make the same mistake that you did your "media rule" that also violated our right to tree press.

Thank You For Your Time
#FREEPALESTINE
Flores, Dora
From: Perla Garcia
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 8:44 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Agents item # 24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Good evening members of the council. My name is Perla Garcia and I am a resident of Anaheim and l urge you to think about democracy. Protesting should not be criminalized, I disagree and oppose agenda item number #24. Please, let us stand on the right side of history and show how principled we are here in the community of Santa Ana, Orange County Thank you for your time,
Perla
Sent from my iPhone
2 Flores, Dora
From: Liz A
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 10:27 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Vote NO on Item #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Dear city council of Santa Ana,
I request that you vote AGAINST item #24 on the agenda for March 19.

I'm a resident of Santa Ana, born and raised. I care about this city and it's people. I am concerned that the people are at risk of being censored by their own city government.

I see item #24 as a desperate attempt to shut down recent pro-Palestenian protests. The protestors for Palestine have been peaceful, and do not warrant such retaliation.

The people are trying to use their voice. Perhaps the mayor interprets loudness as unpeaceful. The reality is, forced decorum is a facet of white supremacy. If the mayor were actually interested in the liberty of the people, she would understand this.

The people have a right to express themselves, in the very streets of the city that they live in.

Do not limit my voice. Do not oppress the people of Santa Ana. - Elizabeth Altamirano
3 Flores, Dora
From: Julia Anderfaas
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 8:00 AM
To: eComment
Subject: Vote Against Agenda Item 24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

I am a citizen of Orange County, and I'm asking you to please vote against agenda item 24. People deserve to have the right to protest in public! Protect free speech whether or not you agree with it. Thank you.

Flores, Dora
From: Fernie Islas d
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 8:31 AM
To: eComment
Subject: Item #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Good morning. My name is Fernando Islas and I am writing in to urge all council members to vote "no" on today's agenda item #24.

As a Marine Corps veteran, I am proud to say I stand to uphold the core values of this country, to include its constitution.

These types of restrictions are a violation of our 1st amendment right and must not be made a precedent.

Best,
Fernando Islas
2 Flores, Dora
From:

Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 8:38 AM
To: Commen
Subject: ity Council Meeting - Agenda Item 24 Comment
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Good Morning,
I am reaching out in regards to the City Council Meeting Line Item 24.

Protesting is a fundamental right protected by the first amendment, an individuals right to protest should not be limited in any way shape or form. Elected officials are supposed to represent their constituents, not lobby groups.

Lately protests have been aimed towards the conflict in Gaza. A conflict where 10's of thousand innocent lives have been taken by Israel's collective punishment. Individuals wanting to silence/limit free speech primarily argue that "conflict on foreign soil does not affect us". '. That is incorrect, billions of American tax dollars are given to foreign countries such as Ukraine and Israel annually for military use. The American people have the right and responsibility to voice their concerns over this, especially when elected officials turn their backs on them.

See the first amendment:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
(link: https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/) Thank you,
3 Flores, Dora
From: Chardaa Carter
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 9:11 AM
To: eComment
Subject: AGENDA ITEM 24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

To Santa Ana City Council Members,
I am writing as a california citizen to encourage you to vote against Agenda Item #24 today.

Our right to protest is fundamental to our democracy.

Thank you,
Chardaa Carter
Flores, Dora
From: Ellen Diamond
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 9:28 AM
To: eComment
Subject: Agenda item 24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

My name is Ellen Diamond. I have lived in Santa Ana for 25 years. I am writing to urge you to NOT approve this ordnance.

Picketing and protest are First Amendment rights. They are at the very core of what it means to be an American. The minute we start limiting the ability to exercise those rights is the minute start to give up our freedom.

Picketing a person's home is disruptive, yes. It is meant to be disruptive. It should cause that person to think why do all these people feel so strongly that they are willing to but themselves possibly in harm's way. Perhaps that person will rethink their position.

Also, to Lou Correa and his neighbors, you know what else is disruptive? Your home being bombed out of existence.

Starvation. Genocide.

Please, allow the protests to continue.

Thank you,
Ellen Diamond
Sent from my iPhone
5 Flores, Dora
From: Brianna Galvan <
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 9:31 AM
To: eComment
Subject: VOTE AGAINST AGENDA ITEM #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

To Santa Ana City Council:
because you hold a public office. As a reminder, the people of Santa Ana are the ones that put you there. You work for us and just as easily as we voted you in office, we can vote you out.

I continue to be disappointed by the way many of you have chosen to represent us and the city of Santa Ana.

CEASEFIRE NOW.

Brianna Galvan
6 Flores, Dora
From: Sadia Khan -
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 10:27 AM
To: eComment
Subject: Agenda item # 24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Hi I am a constituent in Santa Ana and I urge the council to vote AGAINST agenda item #24 it's ridiculous and unconstitutional.

Thank you
Sadia Khan
Sadia Khan
Flores, Dora
From: David Ramirez •
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 10:34 AM
To: eComment
Subject: Agenda Item #25
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Every day for the last 5 months our "leaders" have shown us they're NO LEADERS.

They're doing everything to suppress our voices and curve our rights to protest. They created the current status quo and are now trying to wash their hands.

This entire institution is illegitamizing itself right in front of us. The people can do better without politicians.

Free Palestine!!
2 Flores, Dora
From: Manny Mendoza
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 10:40 AM
To: eComment
Subject: Item #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Hello,
My name is Emanuel Mendoza and I am a resident of Ward 6.

I am urging council David Penaloza to vote against Agenda Item #24 at tonight's council meeting 03/19/2024.

Sincerely,
Emanuel Mendoza
Resident of South Ross Street/St. Gertrude St.
3 Flores, Dora
From: Diana Christoffersen
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 10:42 AM
To: eComment
Subject: Agenda Item No. 24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

I am strongly in favor of instating a City Ordinance that prohibits protests/demonstrations within 300 feet of any private residence. Not only does a protest at a private residence impact that individual and their family, it also impacts/unsettles the safety, peace and quality of everyday life of the surrounding neighbors and a neighborhood in general. I am all for freedom of speech and the right to peacefully protest/demonstrate, but strongly feel that protests/demonstrations should be conducted away from homes/residences and, instead, should be only allowed in public spaces that are beyond 300 feet of any private residence.

Diana Christoffersen
Santa Ana, CA 92706
Flores, Dora
From: Fay Gabriel
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:09 AM
To: eComment
Subject: Protesting is human right granted in democracy Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Sent from my iPhone
Flores, Dora
From: Max Hernandez L
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:24 AM
To: eComment
Subject: VOTE NO ON AGENDA ITEM #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

PROTESTING IS NOT A CRIME!
Our right to protests is fundamental to democracy. We cannot allow voices to be undermined.

PROTECT OUR VOICES!
PROTECT OUR RIGHTS!
PROTESTING IS NOT A CRIME.
vote NO on agenda item #24
Flores, Dora
From: ashlyn oneil ‹
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:27 AM
To: eComment
Subject: Agenda item #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Hello I'm writing as a local who urges city council to vote against agenda item #24. Please do not infringe on our right to peacefully protest c
2 Flores, Dora
From: Junaid Khan
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:33 AM
To: eComment
Subject: Protests in Santa Ana
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Dear Santa Ana public representatives,
I urge you to vote NO on action item #24 on the agenda, as peaceful protests are fundamental rights of all Americans, and this right should not be taken by anyone.

Thank you.

Junaid Khan
Virus-free.www.avast.com
3 Flores, Dora
From: Anthony Delgado
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:34 AM
To: eComment
Subject: Comment on Agenda Item #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Hello,
I am an Orange County resident and I urge you to vote against item #24, a proposed ordinance that will restrict our right to protest in residential areas. The ordinance comes on the heels of a series of protests in front of Congressman Lou Correa's house due to his continued silence as more and more elected officials and people across the country call for a Ceasefire in Gaza. Such protests have been peaceful and are meant to be disruptive.

Since Mayor Amezcua's tenure at the city council, there has been a clear pattern by members of the council to curtail views they don't like including: limiting public comments, pushing agenda items on which young people have shown up to speak on to later into the night, and dismissing the results of the city's own budget surveys only because resident's responses didn't align with their world view.

This proposed ordinance follows a dangerous pattern and it should be rejected by all members of the Santa Ana City Council.

Best,
Anthony
Anthony Delgado
Phone:

Email:

Flores, Dora
From: Bulmaro Vicente
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 T748 AM
To: eComment
Subject: 03/19 CC Meeting Public Comment - Item 24 Chispa's Letter of Opposition Attachments: Chispa Letter of Opposition Item 24 - 3.19. Santa Ana CC.docx.pdf Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Hello,
Please find Chispa's Letter of Opposition to Item 24
In Solidarity,
Boomer
Policy and Political Director | Chispa
e C:

Santa Ana, CA 92705
Chispa is building a political home for young Latinxs in Orange County! Please consider making a donation to help us build our casita. Chispa is a project of Tides Advocacy, a 501c4 non-profit organization.

Chispa
Chispa
March 19, 2024
Mayor Amezcua and City Councilmembers
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
[email protected]
Via Email
RE: OPPOSE ITEM 24: Ordinance Establishing Distance Requirements for Targeted Residential Picketing
Dear Mayor Amezcua and City Councilmembers,
Chispa urges you to vote NO on Item 24, an Ordinance Establishing Distance Requirements for Targeted Residential Picketing. The City of Santa Ana (City) must refuse to trample upon the fundamental right of its residents to protest. Approving this ordinance will not only set a bad precedent across the City, but across the County and State. Instead of limiting the rights of residents, the City should focus on fostering open dialogue and engagement between elected officials and the communities they serve.

The right to peacefully protest is a cornerstone of democracy, allowing individuals to voice their concerns and hold elected officials accountable. This ordinance comes on the heels of a series of protests in front of Congressman Lou Correa's house due to his continued silence as more and more elected officials and people across the country call for a Ceasefire in Gaza. Targeting specific individuals or incidents should not serve as justification for curtailing the rights of all residents. Restricting this right through the imposition of distance requirements sets a dangerous precedent that undermines the principles of free speech and civic engagement.

Furthermore, protesting outside the homes of public officials is not a new phenomenon in Santa Ana. Past protests, such as those outside then-City Councilmember Vicente Sarmiento's residence in 2016, did not lead to similar restrictive measures. Public officials have a duty to acknowledge and honor the rights of their constituents to protest in a peaceful manner. 1 For these reasons, we urge you to vote NO on Item 24 and uphold the principles of democracy and free speech. Instead of limiting the rights of residents, we implore you to focus on fostering open dialogue and engagement between elected officials and the communities they serve.

Sincerelv.

Bulmaro Vicente
Policy and Political Director, Chispa
CC: [email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
2 Flores, Dora
From: Jacob Harkey |
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:04 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Please Vote NO on Proposed Ordinance Restricting Right to Protest Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Hello,
I understand that there is a proposed ordinance which will be voted on shortly relating to protesting in residential areas.

I am writing to express my strongly-held belief that protesting is an important right which must not be taken away; I urge the members of the City Council to vote NO on this proposed ordinance.

Best,
Jacob Harkey
Flores, Dora
From: Jonathan Wu
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:07 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Vote Against Agenda Item #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

I am appalled at this ordinance. To strip away the right to protest is unconstitutional. Protesting is a sign that the people are not being heard by their representatives, and it would be much better for our community if proper dialogue is addressed rather than plugging ears and driving a wedge between the community and its leadership. The people are crying out, please listen. If you take their right to speak, where will that neglect go towards? Thank you
2 Flores, Dora
From: Ann Lou 1
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:13 PM
To: commer
Subject: ein D #215 065 14
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Last time I checked, protesting was NOT a crime. I know many people in northern Santa Ana believe their address offers them some sort of clout, but should it? I understand protesting in a neighborhood could be messy and cumbersome with daily life, but instead of outlawing protesting (unconstitutional), how about well thought out policies relating to neighborhood protesting. Stop the knee jerk reactions to solvable problem. Work this out like you're paid to do, no black and white answers, WORK!
Sent from my iPad
3 Flores, Dora
From: Lauren Tarkow
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:15 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Agenda Item #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Dear Mayor and Council Members,
I am a Santa Ana resident of Ward 3 and I'm writing to express my support of the Ordinance Establishing Distance Requirements for Targeted Residential Picketing. These protests are solely meant to intimidate and harass the residents. They disrupt the peace and tranquility of the neighborhood and threaten the safety of the residents.

Please approve the ordinance.

Thank you,
Lauren Tarkow
Flores, Dora
From: moni t.

Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:19 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Reject item 24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Hello my name is Is Monica Tenorio, I live in ward 6. I urge you to vote no on agenda item #24, a proposed ordinance that will restrict our right to protest in residential areas. The ordinance comes on the heels of a series of protests in front of Congressman Lou Correa's house due to his continued silence as more and more elected officials and people across the country call for a Ceasefire in Gaza.

Since Mayor Amezcua's tenure at the city council, there has been a clear pattern by members of the council to curtail views they don't like including: limiting public comments, pushing agenda items on which young people have shown up to speak on to later into the night, and dismissing the results of the city's own budget surveys only because resident's responses didn't align with their world view.

This proposed ordinance follows a dangerous pattern and it should be rejected by all members of the Santa Ana City Council.

Thank you, Monica Tenorio
6 Flores, Dora
From: Mahmoud
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:20 PM
To: eComment
Subject: protesting is not a crime!
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Hello,
Please vote against agenda item #24 - an ordinance to restrict people's right to protest in residential areas.

Regards,
Mahmoud
Flores, Dora
From: Emma Alvarez
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:46 PM
To: eComment
Subject: WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROTEST
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Hello.

I am reaching out today to strongly oppose your ordinance that will restrict our right to protest in residential areas. By voting YES, you all are directly violating our first amendment rights to freedom of speech. We have the RIGHT to rally wherever we please, as long as we are peaceful and orderly. OUR right to protest is fundamental to democracy and you cannot undermine us solely because we are a "burden" to you. Your attempts to silence us will continue to be futile. - pissed off american
8 Flores, Dora
From: Danett Abbott-Wicker
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:51 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Vote AGAINST Agenda Item #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Protesting is not a crime! Vote NO on Item : #24!
This emergency ordinance will threaten to restrict residents' rights to protest in residential areas. This alarming proposal follows recent protests targeting certain council members and Congressman Lou Correa for their stance on the ceasefire in Gaza.

If passed, this will set a dangerous precedent across the city and county.

Our RIGHT to protest is fundamental to democracy, and we cannot allow it to be undermined.

Danett M. Abbott-Wicker
"Do not get lost in a sea of despair. Be hopeful, be optimistic. Our struggle is not the struggle of a day, a week, a month, or a year, it is the struggle of a lifetime. Never, ever be afraid to make some noise and get in good trouble, necessary trouble."
John Lewis
February 21, 1940-July 17, 2020
Flores, Dora
From: Christina Ruiz
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 12:53 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Public Comment for Item 24: In Opposition of Restricting Rights to Protest Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Dear City Councilmembers,
My name is Christina Ruiz and I'm a resident of ward 4. I am expressing my opposition item #24, restricting rights to protest.

This ordinance sets a dangerous precedent for our city and the country. Our right to protest is fundamental to democracy and a First Amendment right. Residents protesting have made Santa Ana what it is today: a city that values and protects its residents, its tenants, its youth, and its workers. Residents and voters have a right to have their voices heard even if members of the council has a view opposing the people they're supposed to represent.

The right to protest our elected officials' decision, positions, and silence is sacred. I urge all members of city council to vote no on agenda item #24.

Regards,
Christina Ruiz
pronouns: she/her/hers
10 Flores, Dora
From: Mai Do <
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:04 PM
To: eComment; Amezcua, Valerie; Phan, Thai; Vazquez, Benjamin; Bacerra, Phil; Penaloza, David; Lopez, Jessie; Hernandez, Johnathan
Cc: Tracy La; Carlos Perea; Faby Jacome; Gema Suarez
Subject: Agenda Item #24 - Opposition
Attachments: SACC 3.19.24 Letter-3.pdf
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Dear Mayor Amezcua and City Councilmembers,
Please find attached a letter of opposition to Agenda Item #24, signed by several organizations that have engaged the Council repeatedly over the last year and that have concerns about the overall trajectory of the Council's attitudes towards First Amendment activity.

Best,
Mai Nguyen Do
--
Mai Nguyen Do
They/Them
Research & Policy Manager
Harbor Institute for Immigrant & Economic Justice
#www.harborinstituteoc.org
11 Alcala, Abigail
From: Hairo Cortes < [email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:24 PM
To: Comment
Subject: e Item #2
Attachments: Anti-Protesting Ordinance Item 24.pdf
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Hello, I am attaching a petition with 375 signatures in opposition to Agenda Item #24. Please see the attachment.

In Solidarity
Hairo Cortes
Executive Director | Chispa
e: [email protected] c: 657.272.3475 t: @cosmic mijo
1505 E 17h Street, Suite 117 Santa Ana, CA 92705
Chispa is building a political home for Latinx Youth in Orange County! Please consider making a small donation to help us build our casita. Chispa is a project of Tides Advocacy, a 501(c)4 non-profit organization.

Chispa
Confidentiality Notice: This communication with its contents may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. It is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). Unauthorized interception, review, use or disclosure is prohibited and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the communication.

E-mail: [email protected]
1 To: Mayor Valerie Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council I urge you to vote no on agenda item #24, a proposed ordinance that will restrict our right to protest in residential areas. The ordinance comes on the heels of a series of protests in front of Congressman Lou Correa's house due to his continued silence as more and more elected officials and people across the country call for a Ceasefire in Gaza.

Since Mayor Amezcua's tenure at the city council, there has been a clear pattern by members of the council to curtail views they don't like including: limiting public comments, pushing agenda items on which young people have shown up to speak on to later into the night, and dismissing the results of the city's own budget surveys only because resident's responses didn't align with their world view.

This proposed ordinance follows a dangerous pattern and it should be rejected by all members of the Santa Ana City Council.

City State/Province State/Province Abbreviated Zip code Comments Santa Ana California 92701
Anaheim i California 92801
Santa Ana California 92704
Garden Grove California 92843
Hillul 10l3s81l1
Anaheim 92701
Garden Grove 92843
Laguna Niguel 92677
Santa Ana 92703
Anaheim 92804 | urge you to vote no on agenda item #24, a proposed ordinance that will restrict our right to protest in residential areas. The ordinance comes on the heels of a series of
protests in front of Congressman Lou Correa's house due to his continued silence as more and more elected officials and people across the country call for a Ceasefire in Gaza.

Since Mayor Amezcua's tenure at the city council, there has been a clear pattern by members of the council to
curtail views they don't like including: limiting public comments, pushing agenda items on which young people
have shown up to speak on to later into the night, and
dismissing the results of the city's own budget surveys only because resident's responses didn't align with their world view.

Carah Reed Santa Ana California CA 92706 It's unfortunate because these politicians used to care about the people.

Anita Mercado Santa Ana California CA 92706
Manar Adem Placentia California CA 92870
Jordan Shilkoff Garden Grove California CA 92843
Antonio Benitez Huntington Beach California CA 90631
Andrea Diaz Santa Ana California CA 92703
Kayla Asato North Tustin California CA 92705
Carolina Mendez Anaheim California CA 92801
Kelli Corona Santa Ana California CA 92701 I am sending this email because I am appalled at agenda item #24. It must be voted against. It is repugnant and anti- democratic. If city council attempts to restrict the right to peacefully protest and violates our fundamental ist
amendment right it will not be respected and it will incur more protest which is your citizens' prerogative and duty. If representatives are unwilling to hear dissenting opinions and engage with voters exercising their 1st amendment
rights, even when they disagree, then they are unfit for public service and should immediately step down. This is a gross violation of our rights.

If you are not fit to be a leader then do not choose to be one. I am a lifetime resident of Santa Ana, currently
residing in Ward 5. This is completely unacceptable.

Whichever council members put this on the agenda should Brandon Gallegos Santa Ana California CA 92707
Tyler Marine Santa Ana California CA 92701 Free Palestine Cecilia Chavez Tustin California CA 92780 Peaceful protest is a right.

Yesenia Altamirano Anaheim California CA 92805
Yesenia Altamirano Anaheim California CA 92805
Yelitza Vazquez Fullerton California CA 92831
1 CA 92703 Let Santaneros voice their opinions against OUR elected officials!
CA 92703
CA 92703
CA 92626
CA 92614
92706 Free Palestine!
92703
92835
Ellis 92504
CA 92707
Xiao CA 95742
Raza CA 90631
CA 92804
Cruz CA 92805
CA 92801 PROTESTING IS NOT A CRIME!!!
CA 92618
CA 92701 Jorge
1111108818081-1811278381188 CA 92614
CA 92620
OR 97213
CA 92612
lita CA 92705 Free Palestine!
CA 92801
CA 92703
CA 90057
CA 92705 I demand my right to protest not be infringed upon! CA 90031 Freedom to protest
res CA 92701
CA 92705
Tyeb CA 92705
CA 92835
CA 92801
CA 92804
CA 92707
CA 92802 Good evening members of the council. My name is Perla Garcia and I am a resident of Anaheim and I urge you to think about democracy. Protesting should not be
criminalized. Please, let us stand on the right side of history and show how principled we are here in the
community of Santa Ana, Orange County and beyond.

Cynthia Cambero Santa Ana California CA 92706 It is our right as American citizens to protest and demand that our representatives hear our voices. It's time members of government remember who represents who and as
uncomfortable as that truth may be if the people are not satisfied they should be able to nonviolently express those sentiments. Reconsider being a representative of that truth is uncomfortable but I ask you not pass this
unconstitutional nonsense.

Dean Inada Irvine California CA 92614
Kazandra Maldonado-ramirez Garden Grove California CA 92840 Ruby Partida Colton California CA 92324 Since when did freedom of speech become so selective????? Free Palestine!!!!!
Everardo Arrizon La Habra California CA 90631
Wendy Rodriguez Santa Ana California 92707 Protestar es nuestro derecho Martha Meléndrez Santa Ana California CA 92707
Cassidy Pesak North Tustin California CA 92705
Joshua Smith Santa Ana California CA 92707
Pau Lagarde Placentia California CA 92870
Irvine California CA 92620
Suha Zaidan Tustin California CA 92782
2 Irvine CA 92619
Perris CA 92571
CA 92707
CA 92672 Ceasefire
CA 92704
CA 92707 Violation of my first amendment right.

Irvine CA 92603
CA 92703 American values have to be upheld and freedom of speech is paramount in preserving our rights as free people
92870
CA 92870 Is this really how you want to be remembered in History? Irvine CA 92606 The right to protest is part of the constitution. Any breach of this is a step against American liberty!
CA
CA No on item #24!
CA
CA
CA
CA Compared to the carnage in Gaza, the inconvenience of protests outside Congressman Correa's house is harmless.

Said protestors have done a far better job at protecting democracy than he, or Mayor Amezcua who is presenting
this item, have since the beginning of the recent Israeli attacks on Palestine.

NV 89122 Our founding father built this country through the art of protest, a right that will never be constrained. Free
Palestine!
CA 90604
CA 92881
CA 92704 Protests is what this country was built on. Protesting is not a crime. Please remember, elected officials work FOR the citizens. Voters will certainly not forget this ordinance come VA
CA
Iris CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
Irvine CA 103
CA
CA Freedom of speech!
CA We proudly celebrate civil rights movements led by leaders like Cesar Chavez and Martin Luther King Jr. who heavily utilized protesting to bring awareness and traction to their movements. During that time these movements were often
seen as nuisances and unnecessary to those who opposed
them. Yet now we have days dedicated to them, social
media posts are posted without hesitation, we tell our
children how heroic and brave these individuals were to stand up for what they believed in. So to such see such hypocrisy from those who are supposed to be the leaders of the City of Santa Ana is embarrassing. Be on the right side of history!
Pat Davis Anaheim California CA 92801 This is such an obvious attempt at continuing to use your positions in the worst way. All our electeds should not be allowed to hide, especially when making decisions that are proven deadly, while not willing to face differing opinions.

You need to get your big fol pants on and face the public! 3 California CA 92801 This is such an obvious attempt at continuing to use your positions in the worst way. All our electeds should not be allowed to hide, especially when making decisions that are proven deadly, while not willing to face differing opinions.

You need to get your big folx pants on and face the public! CA 92707
CA 90650
Irvine CA 92620
CA 90032
92704
92683
CA 92805
CA 92705
CA 92335
CA 92704 | live in Santa Ana Ward 4, Thorton Park Neighborhood CA 92703
CA 95380
CA 92801 I uphold my Constituional right to protest and I reject authoritarian Item #24. Mayor Amezcua and her mindless
followers DO NOT arbitrarily get to diminish our
Constitutional Rights!
92801
CA 92701
CA 92627
S. CA 92630
CA 90063
CA 92706
CA 92707
CA 90012
92706
91765
92865
CA 92236
CA 92704
CA 92805
CA 92707 Signed 4
CA 92704
IVY
90731
Liz CA 91016
NY 10031
CA 92706 CONSTITUENTS HAVE A RIGHT TO PROTEST THEIR
CITY AND STATE POLITICIANS (the very people they have
elected into said position)
CA 92706
CA 92706 Protesting is not a crime.

Indio CA 92203
CA 91361 unpopular opinion: free speech good
CA 91361 unpopular opinion: free speech good
Ali CA 90034
CA 92704
CA 92868
CA 92701
CA 92122
CA 92701
ach CA 92647
CA 92794
CA 91104
Lulu CA 92656
CA 90018
4 Sophia Sandoval East Los Angeles California CA 90022
Molly Santa Ana California CA 92707
Billy Shen Fountain Valley California CA 92708
bakr teebi Santa Ana California CA 92701
Mirvette Juden Buena Park California CA 90621
Allie Mosier Anaheim California CA 92802
Maria Martinez Fullerton California CA 92833
Talha Umarji Irvine California CA 92602
Jubran Sarkis Orange California CA 92867 Freedom of speech Maha Afra Long Beach California CA 90803 Why are you taking away from us our right to protest? What else are you planning to take away from us, our
dignity and humanity? We will never stop. We will never be silent. You cannot dehumanize and terrorize people and
except compliance. By taking our right to protest, you will be oppressing us and therefore inciting resistance because when there is injustice, resistance is justified. Think again.

Examine the motives behind this inequitable idea that runs against our constitutional rights!
CA 90620
CA 92804
CA 92626 This is not a crime. We have the right to express ourselves CA 92804
CA 90630
CA 92708
CA 92879 Permanent ceasefire now!
CA 92879 Permanent ceasefire now!
CA 92879 Permanent ceasefire now!
CA 92805
CA 92705
CA 92692
Tustin CA 92782
CA 90606 The first amendment protects both the right of the people peaceably to assemble and the right to freedom of speech.

Politicians are supposed to be for the people, not the other way around. If it's inconvenient for specific politicians to be protested by their constituents and neighboring
communities then perhaps they should listen to the people they claim to represent. People aren't protesting because it's fun, it's because it's essential to do everything in our power during a serious humanitarian crisis. Genocides are not supposed to be political. Ethnic cleansing is not
political. Don't participate in what is nearing towards fascistic practices and protect the rights of the people living in your area.

Angie-Karina Munoz Anaheim California CA 92806 It is imperative that the City of Santa Ana does not restrict the right of constituents to protest in residential areas, especially when the protests that have triggered this
ordinance to be created, have been peaceful and
intentional. It is a constitutional right to protest and petition our government, and constituents should be able to use
whatever avenues legally available to them to have their voices heard. Polling shows that a majority of voters are in a favor of a ceasefire in Gaza, and the City of Santa Ana recently passed a ceasefire resolution. It's time that Lou Correa listens to his constituents and stop turning a blind eye. Should this ordinance pass, it will only allow Rep.

Correa to continue to insulate himself from the desires of his constituents all while turning his back on the suffering of Palestinians.

Ammar Anaheim California CA 92807
Cecilia Avila Garden Grove California CA 92840
Laura Younes Redondo Beach California CA 90278 We have the rights to hold our leaders accountable with protest. We have the right to condemn our elected officials when they do not use their position to represent the people that voted them into office.

We have the rights to freedom of speech on public spaces.

Taking those rights away speaks volumes on our elected
officials priorities.

Noor Aljawad Laguna Niguel California CA 92677 Freedom speech is a human right. 5 M Irvine CA 92606
CA 92804 We have rights as Americans.

CA 92630
CA 90005
CA 92807
92702
92841
90026
1000h 013331l 92707
Irvine CA 92620
CA 92708
CA 92618 Peaceful protest is protected under our constitution CA 92701
CA 92692 Lou sucks
CA 92651
CA 92882
CA 92870 I am appalled this suppressive measure is on the agenda.

This would silence free speech and disallow the people's ability to peacefully protest. Protests are meant to be disruptive and Lou Corea refuses to budge on his
genocidal stance when it comes to Palestinians who are
being killed in Gaza by the vicious Israel military. Our tax dollars are being used to fund this genocide so we have every right to protest outside a congressman's house to advocate for human rights.

CA 92705
CA 91706
CA 92804
CA 92705 Please do not push another attempt at silencing your constituents!
CA 92704
CA 92882
CA 92706
CA 92868 Protect first amendment
CA 92620 You cannot silence the marginalized and get away with it.

CA 92804 Free Palestine!!!
CA 92706
1088101.208683811
CA 92804
CA 92620
CA 92701
CA 92701 protesting is not a crime
92805
92701
92618
92706
92805
92801
92805
6 Beatriz Nualart Santa Ana California CA 92703 Do not pass this ordinance. It's clear that this is an attempt to silence the voices of Santa Ana citizens & it must not be allowed.

We elected the people in positions of power to represent us, the people. If you cannot handle protestors, don't
campaign and do all the work to get into these seats,
because it is our obligation to hold representatives in all positions accountable. This has been true since day one. It is our duty to ensure our country runs how we demand it runs, if you take away this right, you're taking away our right to free speech & our ability to hold politicians
accountable.

Furthermore, your attempt to silence us won't keep us from protesting at your residences and fundraisers. This will only increase the amount of protests because now we'll have
more to protest.

Santa Ana is made up of primarily people of color, by
passing this ordinance you're silencing the voices of
people of color to favor a primarily white and wealthy
neighborhood & that is something that cannot happen.

We have a right to protest & hold our elected
representatives accountable, especially when they're
92794
92706
92707
18808 588885
92701 Araceli Robles
92704
92780 Amidst a genocide that's been going on for almost six months now, we cannot afford to be restricted or silenced.

Our protests in front of Correa's house has been nothing but peaceful. We need to hold Congressmen accountable
for their actions.
92805
92833
92701
92703
92672 If you don't like people peacefully protesting outside your house don't become a PUBLIC official.
888 90620
92704
92833
95380
95380
92704
90049 Ever since I moved to this country I've been trying to figure out why Americans feel so "free" while being
micromanaged with a bunch of laws. This is yet another
one that proves to me how much of a "land of the free" is a farce. If you were in Europe you'd have cow dung set on fire in front of your house. The protesting you're enduring is VANILLA compared to how we protest in Europe and you
lot can't even handle a little peaceful protesting but
bombing kids overseas?? No biggie! That's noise is
bearable
The first world problems here never cease to amaze me.

Disgusting law and disgusting, unamerican idea. You have 92804
90670
92703
88858 55 90670
90806 The ordinance is a violation of a basic tenet of our rights as Americans: Free speech!
Irvine 92603
92887
7 Jayde Estrada Costa Mesa California CA 92626
Dara Thunyakij Anaheim California CA 92806 Shame that this resolution has been proposed so quickly when there are much more urgent matters that requir
action and attention for residents of Santa Ana. Instead of limiting the right to free speech maybe look instead into the causes of such protests and take action on that instead of silencing these people.

Olivia Jones Long Beach California CA 90804
Robert Sanchez Santa Ana California CA 92707
Piper Hill Santa Ana California CA 92704
Robert Sanchez Santa Ana California CA 92707
Marco Cortez Santa Ana California CA 92703 To: Mayor Valerie Amezcua and the Santa Ana City Council From: M. Cortez
I urge you to VOTE NO ON AGENDA ITEM #24, a proposed
ordinance that will restrict our right to protest in residential areas. The ordinance comes on the heels of a series of
protests in front of Congressman Lou Correa's house due to his continued silence as more and more elected officials and people across the country call for a Ceasefire in Gaza.

Since Mayor Amezcua's tenure at the city council, there has been a clear pattern by members of the council to
curtail views they don't like including: limiting public comments, pushing agenda items on which young people
have shown up to speak on to later into the night, and
dismissing the results of the city's own budget surveys only because resident's responses didn't align with their world view.

This proposed ordinance follows a dangerous pattern and it should be rejected by all members of the Santa Ana City Council.

Stop attempting to silence us. We have every right to
protest even in residential areas. We've followed every noise ordinance, stayed off the streets & even brought
people to help maintain a secure & safe area. The media, such as ABC 7 and other OC & Santa Ana media groups
have been following our action and are helping spread the word that you're attempting to step all over our rights to hold you all accountable.

M.C
California CA 92833
California CA 92707
ach California 92647
California CA 92704
California CA 92629
California CA 92706
California CA
California CA 92551
California CA 92703
California CA 92707
California CA 92707
California CA 92651
California CA 92703
10000000esal00de1163/1l9 1800111111008.00161 California CA 92705 California CA 92618 This is within our constitutional right California CA 92701
California CA 92806
California CA 90601 Protesting is freedom of speech and expression! California CA 92701
California CA 92336
California CA 90025
California 92651
California 92887
California CA 92704
California CA 90680 Protesting is our right
California CA 92707
8 Maria CA 92703
Yousif CA 92606 You're causing chaos within the community. It seems like you don't care about what the people have to say.

Casey CA 92780 The right to protest is enshrined in the first amendment to the American Constitution. Censorship of humanitarian
pleads for justice is authoritative and WRONG. CEASEFIRE IN GAZA, NOW!
CA 92782
AZ 85364 I reject authoritarian item 24. Uphold our rights to protest.

CA 92679
92801
CA 90241
CA 92801
CA 92707-2202
CA 92806
CA 92618
CA 92707
CA 92705 It is our RIGHT to express ourselves via free speech and assemblv!
CA 92782
CA 92821 We have the right to protest, we vote these people in, and we will vote them out! We are not damaging property, we are not committing violence, we are standing up for fellow humankind, and our tax monies funding a genocide, we
have homeless people we have outrageous rent, yet we're sending billions to wipe out a population! This is ptable and until there is resolution, we shall continue to protest peacefully
Vanessa Mejia Santa Ana California CA 92703 Vanessa Mejia Dana Obeid Santa Ana California CA 92706 Mayor Amezcua and Santa Ana Council, I demand that you protect our constitutional right for free speech and assembly. Protesting in public places and on sidewalks is not a crime and our right to protest must be protected at all costs. We are ready to challenge any
restrictions to our constitutional right in court.
91206
CA 92706 It's absurd that we have to do this. Shame on Mayor Amezcia.

CA 92707
CA 90015 Please protect our constitutional right to protest.

CA 92683
CA 92606
CA 92804
CA 92887
CA 92692 We absolutely have the right to protest
CA 92677
CA 92866 Because it is an essential American right to protest and that right should never be inhibited
CA 92604 Lou Correa is attempting to strip Americans of their most basic civil liberties: freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. If he is so annoyed by us, maybe try talking to us or better yet, call for a ceasefire.

Max hernandez Long Beach CA 90804
Myriam Tinajero Orange CA 92869 Protesting is protected under the 1st Amendment.

Amir Obeid Huntington Beach CA 92647 Protest is a fundamental right Narjes Gasmi Irvine CA 92606 Protesting is not a crime or unlawful, this is the United States of America not a 3rd world country! We have the
right to express our concerns Not to be silenced
Junaid 1 Khan Orange CA 92869
Moe Kaung Sunnyvale CA 94087
ashlyn oneil Santa Ana CA 92701
Anna Cecilia Fierro North Tustin CA 92705
Ana Lara Anaheim CA 92804
Mahmoud Saad Anaheim CA 92801 Freedom of speech
9 Amal Alkalla Irvine California CA 92602 It is not a crime to protest our elected representatives. It's our first amendment right to protest.

Seher Rowther Costa Mesa California CA 92626 Our right to protest peacefully is essential for our democracy and to take this away would be a shameful
mistake and an embarrassment.

Shawna McCann Yorba Linda California CA 92886
Timur Mamedov Davis California CA 95616
Bassam Saddik San Jose California CA 95132
Saine Carrasco Garden Grove California 92843
Saima Khan Orange California CA 92869
Lila Al-ghizawi Elk Grove California CA 95757
Marina Salmon Santa Ana California CA 92701 By not listening to voters and by not allowing effective protest, this ordinance if passed will effectively take our "democracy" that much closer to an authoritarian
government. The city has passed a ceasefire resolution, we only ask that our elected representative who lives in this city to do the same.

CA 92373 Nothing is more American than the right to publicly protest grievances and injustices.

CA 90066
CA 90066
CA 90002 It is our right as Americans to practice freedom of speech which is also shown in protests, we should be able to
protest peacefully.

CA 92612
CA 92630
CA CA Freedom of assembly is fundamental to our democracy! CA 90505 Protests should not be banned as they are a form of free speech! This is against the tenets of democracy! Don't kill democracy by outlawing protests! Let democracy live!
CA 92706
CA 92683
91722
92703 | urge the city council to vote no on item #24 as it is a direct attack on the first amend which protects our rights to assemble and express our rights through protest.

CA 92708
CA 92704
CA 92677 The right to protest must be protected!
use CA 95391
CA 92620
CA 92867 Protesting is a right
CA 92704 Mayor Amezcua should be ashamed of her attack on the 1st Amendment
CA 92612 People should be allowed to protest everywhere. 92620
92832
CA 92832
CA 90631
CA 92870
CA 92801
CA 92694
CA 94521 Cease fire now
10 Alcala, Abigail
From: SallySanders
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:26 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Agenda item #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Dear city council members,
I would like you all to please vote AGAINST the proposed item that would restrict the community from peacefully protesting near a politician's home. (Or any home.).

The right to peacefully protest must be protected. This is part of the American government and always has been. How can we say we live in a free country if we can't protest? We can't. This would set a dangerous precedent for Orange County and move us toward fascism. Besides, in a purely practical way, a 300 foot buffer zone will not make the protesters go away. They will just be closer to other people's houses, at a distance of 301 feet from the actual recipient of the action. How does that make any sense? It doesn't.

This entire thing would be solved if the recipient of the protest would stop supporting genocide. We just want peace.

We want a ceasefire. Please protect the right to protest.

Thank you,
Sally Sanders.

Alcala, Abigail
From: Maria Ceja 4
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:26 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Item #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Mayor and City Council Members,
I am writing in opposition of Item #24. It's quite embarrassing that some of our local elected officials are wanting to limit our first amendments rights by adopting distance requirements for residential picketing in light of recent demonstrations at Congressman Lou Correa's home, as well as demonstrations outside of his office and outside of a reelection fundraiser for Mayor Amezcua. This is what comes with these positions of power; constituents are demonstrating to elected officials that their representatives are not representing what is morally right. This is especially true when said elected officials have been avoiding and willfully ignoring the interests of their constituents, as well as acting in harmful ways. Residents want their voices to be heard and if their representatives are not willing to meet and listen to them, they have had to resort to demonstrating as the only means to be heard. Protestors are asking for the end to the genocide of Palestinian people and instead of calling for a ceasefire to represent what the majority of their constituents want, Lou Correa and Valerie Amezcua are being cowardice and coercive by trying to implement this ordinance. PLEASE DO NOT ADOPT THIS ORDINANCE.

Respectfully,
Maria Ceja
Alcala, Abigail
From: Angelica Campa
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:33 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Public comment: Protesting is our right
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Vota against item #24. It's in American.

Alcala, Abigail
From: Chelsea Velez
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:42 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Urgent Request to Oppose Agenda Item #24: Protect Our Right to Protest Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Dear Santa Ana City Council,
As a concerned member of the Santa Ana community, I am reaching out to urgently request your opposition to Agenda Item #24.

I firmly believe that restricting our constituents' ability to protest in residential areas would constitute a direct violation of our fundamental right to peaceful assembly and free expression. The ability to voice dissent and advocate for change is a cornerstone of our democracy, and any measures that inhibit this right are deeply concerning.

Protests often serve as a critical avenue for community members to raise awareness about issues that directly impact their lives and neighborhoods. By attempting to limit protests to designated areas, we risk silencing marginalized voices and undermining the democratic process.

I urge you to consider the broader implications of supporting such restrictions and to prioritize the protection of our constitutional rights. Our community's ability to peacefully assemble and protest must be safeguarded, not curtailed.

Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I sincerely hope that you will stand with the community in opposing Agenda Item #24.

Thanks,
Chelsea Velez (she/her/hers)
Alcala, Abigail
From: Alexandra Noyes 1
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 1:49 PM
To: eComment
Subject: A Jew says NO please on #24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Protesting is not a crime!
These are people who have had family members killed and they want this to stop before more die.

They deserve First Amendment rights.

Alexandra Noyes
Alcala, Abigail
From: Sadad Talhouni
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:00 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Vote NO on Agenda Item 24
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Hello, my name is Sadad Talhouni, I'm a resident of Santa Ana, Ward 4.

I urge you to vote no on agenda item #24, a proposed ordinance that will restrict our right to protest in residential areas. The ordinance comes on the heels of a series of protests in front of Congressman Lou Correa's house due to his continued silence as more and more elected officials and people across the country call for a Ceasefire in Gaza.

Since Mayor Amezcua's tenure at the city council, there has been a clear pattern by members of the council to curtail views they don't like including: limiting public comments, pushing agenda items on which young people have shown up to speak on to later into the night, and dismissing the results of the city's own budget surveys only because resident's responses didn't align with their world view.

This proposed ordinance follows a dangerous pattern and it should be rejected by all members of the Santa Ana City Council.

Yours sincerely,
Sadad Talhouni
Santa Ana, 92705 CA
Alcala, Abigail
From: Jordan Shilkoff L
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 2:00 PM
To: eComment
Subject: Santa Ana city council meeting 3/19 agenda item #24 Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

Good afternoon,
My name is Jordan and I am an Orange County resident writing in to urge you in voting against agenda item #24.

This ordinance is an infringement on your constituent's rights and creates a dangerous precedent for the county. We must have the right to protest as it is fundamental to democracy.

Thank you.

Alcala, Abigail
From: Saima Khan
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:41 AM
To: eComment
Subject: Right to protest
Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana. Use caution when opening attachments or links.

I oppose article 24.

Restrictions on public protests.

Saima khan