Agenda packet — Santa Ana City Council, September 17, 2024 (part 2 of 8)

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency (PWA) is responsible for the administration and oversight of all Capital Improvement Projects in the City. Santiago Park is a 35-acre linear park located at the northern edge of the City along Santiago Creek. PWA submitted a successful grant application and received a total of $2.8 million from the State of California Coastal Conservancy to revitalize the Santiago Park Main Street Entrance and west end of the park (Exhibit 1). The scope of work includes removal of asphalt concrete pavement, grading, construction of an upgraded bike trail, decomposed granite pedestrian walkways, area lighting, picnic areas, landscaping and irrigation system, site furniture, and signage. Once completed, these improvements will improve the existing Main Street entrance to Santiago Park, provide an upgraded passive area within the park, and support compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards.

A copy of construction plans, contracts, specifications and all related reference materials (such as The Greenbook) are available for public review at the City’s Public Works Agency, Central Files office located in City Hall.

Public Outreach and Contractor Participation
To provide an opportunity for local vendors to submit bids, the City notified a total of 78 regional vendors via PlanetBids, many of which are Santa Ana based. No bids were received from any Santa Ana contractors.

As legally required, a Notice Inviting Bids was advertised in the Orange County Register newspaper on June 19 and June 26, 2024. The project was also advertised in PlanetBids from June 17 through July 10, 2024. Bids were received electronically via PlanetBids on July 10, 2024.

Bid Results Summary
Rank Bidder’s Name Location Base Bid
1 Armstrong Cal Builders Inc. Stanton, CA $2,763,816
2 PUB Construction, Inc. Diamond Bar, CA $3,088,357
3 MBC Enterprises Inc. Huntington Beach, CA $3,465,519
A total of three bids were received and all were deemed responsive. Armstrong Cal Builders Inc. submitted the lowest responsive base bid in the amount of $2,763,816 (Exhibit 2). As specified in the bid documents, the lowest bid shall be determined on the basis of the Base Bid. Based on the bid analysis and a contractor’s reference check, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to Armstrong Cal Builders Inc. for the base bid of $2,763,816 (Exhibit 3), excluding the alternate bid.

City Council 15 – 2 9/17/2024
Santiago Park Main Street Entrance Project
September 17, 2024

Page 3 ends

Armstrong Cal Builders Inc. has not performed work as a prime contractor in the City of Santa Ana within the last five years. However, a reference check was made with other public agencies and good reviews were received regarding the quality of work performed by the contractor on previous projects.

Project Delivery
To deliver a complete project, in addition to the construction contract, the estimated total project delivery cost includes budget allocation for construction administration, inspection, and testing. Construction administration and inspection may be performed by either Staff or consultants and includes construction management, inspection of the Contractor’s work to ensure contract compliance, workmanship and quality, materials testing, and implementation of labor requirements.

Any of the allocated construction administration funds not spent are considered project savings and are returned to the respective fund balance upon close out of the project.

In addition to the Construction Contract Bid Amount, Staff requests that the City Council allocate and authorize a project contingency budget equal to 10% of the Contract Bid Amount. The recommended contingency budget will allow Staff to execute contract change orders in the event unexpected conditions arise or if additional work is required to effectively deliver the project.

As indicated in the Cost Analysis (Exhibit 4) and as summarized in the table below, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $3,207,000.

Project Item Total
Construction Contract Bid Amount $2,763,816
Construction Administration $88,405
Inspection $56,713
Testing $21,684
Project Contingencies $276,382
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST $3,207,000

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15301(a) of the CEQA Guidelines for projects consisting of minor alteration to an existing public facility. The proposed project continues to meet these parameters of the CEQA Guidelines, and Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER-2023-130 was filed for the Santiago Main Street Entrance project 20-2731 on December 20, 2023.

City Council 15 – 3 9/17/2024
Santiago Park Main Street Entrance Project
September 17, 2024

Page 4 ends

FISCAL IMPACT
As indicated in the Cost Analysis, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $3,207,000. All funds are available for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2024-25 Capital Improvement Program (Exhibit 6). Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be carried forward into FY 2025-26.

The proposed contract authorizes staff a maximum of 10% in contingencies for construction contract change orders. Staff will return to the City Council for authorization and appropriation of additional contingency if necessary.

With the approval of the requested appropriation adjustments, $2,807,000 in grant funds will be recognized in the Parks Capital Grants, State Grant-Direct revenue account (No. 16117002-52025) and appropriated for spending in the Parks Capital Grants, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (No. 16117263-66220), and $400,000 of the accumulated fund balance will be appropriated for spending in the Residential Development District 2, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (No. 31213260-66220). The spendable portion of the fund balance is estimated to be $6,142,246 as of June 30, 2024, of which $4,739,260 is committed to existing and earmarked projects, leaving a balance of $1,402,986, which is sufficient to allow for the recommended appropriation of $400,000.

The following table summarizes the funds budgeted for expenditure to deliver the construction of this project:

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit
- Account No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account No.

Description
Amount
Appropriation Adjustments
24-25 16117263-66220
(20-2731)
Parks Capital
Grants
SA River Conservancy
Program-PWA,
Improvements Other
Than Buildings
$2,807,000
24-25 31213260-66220
(20-2731)
Residential
Development
District 2
Acquisition &
Development,
Improvements Other
Than Building
$400,000
Total $3,207,000

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Location Map & Concept Plan

2. Bid Proposal

3. Construction Contract

4. Cost Analysis
City Council 15 – 4 9/17/2024
Santiago Park Main Street Entrance Project
September 17, 2024

Page 5 ends

5. Environmental Determination

6. FY 2023-24 Capital Improvement Program Sheet
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council 15 – 5 9/17/2024
EXHIBIT 1

SANTA ANA
Project No. 20-2731:

Santiago Park Main Street Entrance Development
Location Map
PWA

PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
City Council 15 – 6 9/17/2024
Concept Design for Santiago Main Street Improvements.

City Council 15 – 7 9/17/2024
City Council 15 – 8 9/17/2024
City Council 15 – 9 9/17/2024
City Council 15 – 10 9/17/2024
City Council 15 – 11 9/17/2024
City Council 15 – 12 9/17/2024
City Council 15 – 13 9/17/2024
City Council 15 – 14 9/17/2024
City Council 15 – 15 9/17/2024
City Council 15 – 16 9/17/2024
City Council 15 – 17 9/17/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA REBID

PROPOSAL
PIt0.lEC l'NO. 20-(1965. n'fP 506-l(196) S]'nNDAItl) nVL IIIKEWAY FITOM Wn RNI:lt AVI. -J() ,NI) q'f PttO.llrcl N0. 20-6962, A'lI'506-l(l9t'l) MCI;ADDIjN AVIr lllKtiWAY IittOM IIAITUOR III-VD l() GI{AND AVlr PI{OJLC'I N0. 23-6707 S'|ANDAI{D AVII PAVEMENI I{LILABILIIAIION I)I(OM WAltNEl( AVI fO 2NI) sl PIIOJLCT NO. 23-6705 MCITADDEN AVh PAVEMLNT RIlllAlllLI lAllON IrROM IIAIUIOR BLVD 1-O FAIRVIEW 51' Plto.IECT NO. 19-692-l - MCf AIIDEN AVE PAVEMENI'IiIrI.IABILITATION I:ROM FAIRVIEW S'f l'() RA[I] Sl' PRO.TECI'NO. 23-6706 -. MCFADDEN A\[ PAVEMENT REI.IARILITATION FROM RAITT ST T'O GITAND AVL, Specifications, shall be $6,000 per calendar day. For each Phase not completed withing the allocated working days liquidated darrages will be applied per Phase.

Name of Finn
Signature of BIDDER
Title President
(lf an individual, so state. If a firm or co-paftrlership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-paftners composing the finn. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of Presiderit, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) Corporation: Vido Samaaich, lnc.

Vido Samazich - President
Vido L. Samarzich - Vice President
Monika Samazich - Secretary
City Council P-14 of P-30 15 – 18 9/17/2024
EXHIBIT 4
Construction Contract $ 2,763,815.75
Contract Administration, Inspection and Testing $ 166,802.25 Contingencies $ 276,382.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 3,207,000.00
CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT NO. 20-2731: Santiago Park Main Street Entrance Development

COST ANALYSIS
City Council 15 – 19 9/17/2024
City Council 15 – 20 9/17/2024
City Council 15 – 21 9/17/2024
City Council 15 – 22 9/17/2024
CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 24/25CIP

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Removal of asphalt concrete pavement, grading, construction of an upgraded bike trail, decomposed granite pedestrian walkways, area lighting, picnic areas, landscaping and irrigation system, site furniture and signage.

PROJECT NEED:

The area is in need of new security lighting, new irrigation system, replacing and adding trees that died in the drought, and creating additional picnic areas for school age children.

PROJECT TITLE:

Santiago Park Main Street Entrance
PROJECT CATEGORY:

City & Park Facility Improvements
Park Facility

LOCATION MAP
AGENCY: DIVISION: CONTACT: DATE:

Public Works Parks, Fleet & Facilities Suzi Furjanic, Assoc. Park Planner 29-Aug-2024 PROJECT COSTS FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 Construction 2,763,816 - - - - - -
Contingency 276,382 - - - - - -
Engineering 166,802 - - - - - -
TOTAL 3,207,000 - - - - - -
SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 A & D District 2 400,000 - - - - - -
SA RIVER CONSERVANCYPWA2,807,000 - - - - - -
TOTAL 3,207,000 - - - - - -
EXHIBIT 6
City Council 15 – 23 9/17/2024
Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/public-works
Item # 16
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
September 17, 2024
TOPIC: Bristol Street Improvements and Widening from Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

AGENDA TITLE
Construction Contract with Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. for the Bristol Street Improvements and Widening from Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Project (Project No. 13-6792) (General and Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $3,343,934 of prior-year fund balance in the Select Street Construction, Prior Year Carry Forward revenue account, and appropriate the same amount to the Select Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expense account. (Requires five affirmative votes)

2. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $1,200,000 of prior-year fund balance in the New Transportation System Improvement Area F, Prior Year Carry Forward revenue account, and appropriate the same amount to the New Transportation System Improvement Area F, Improvements Other Than Building expense account. (Requires five affirmative votes)

3. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $656,000 of grant funds in the Select Street Construction, Federal Grant-Indirect revenue account and appropriate the same amount to the Select Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building expense account. (Requires five affirmative votes)

4. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Capital Improvement Program to include $5,199,934 in construction funds for the Bristol Street Improvements and Widening from Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Project (No. 13-6792).

5. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $13,224,187, which includes $10,579,350 for the construction contract; $1,586,902 for contract administration, inspection, and testing; and a $1,057,935 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work.

City Council 16 – 1 9/17/2024
Bristol Street Improvements and Widening from Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Project
September 17, 2024

Page 2 ends

6. Award a construction contract to Los Angeles Engineering, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $10,579,350 for construction of the Bristol Street Improvements and Widening from Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Project, for a term beginning September 17, 2024 and ending upon project completion, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.

7. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. EIR Number No. 89-01 was filed for the Bristol Street Improvements and Widening from Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue project.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency (PWA)’s Engineering Division is responsible for managing the City’s roads and transportation network. Bristol Street is a part of the regionally significant north-south corridor, which is designated as a major arterial highway in the City's General Plan Circulation Element. Bristol Street, between Warner Avenue and Memory Lane, is a long-term improvement project to be completed in several phases as funding becomes available. The initial phases were completed in 2002, which included improvements from St. Andrew Place to McFadden Avenue and from Elm Street to Memory Lane.

Since then, enhancements have been made at key intersections, such as Bristol Street and Warner Avenue, Bristol Street and 17th Street, as well as segments between McFadden Avenue and Civic Center Drive, and from Washington Avenue to 17th Street.

The current phase will improve Bristol Street from Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue (Exhibit 1). These improvements include roadway widening from two to three lanes in each direction with protected bike lanes, wider sidewalks, parkways, and a raised landscape median. The project will also include sound walls adjacent to residential parcels and water main improvements.

Once completed, these improvements will enhance the ride quality and visual appearance of the Bristol Street corridor. The next phase will address the segment from Warner Avenue to St. Andrew Place, further continuing the transformation of this transportation route.

City Council 16 – 2 9/17/2024
Bristol Street Improvements and Widening from Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Project
September 17, 2024

Page 3 ends

Public Outreach and Contractor Participation
To provide an opportunity for local vendors to submit bids, the City notified a total of 101 regional vendors via PlanetBids, many of which are Santa Ana based. A total of five bids were received. No bids were received from a Santa Ana contractor.

As legally required, a Notice Inviting Bids was advertised in the Orange County Register newspaper on June 28 and July 19, 2024. The project was also advertised in PlanetBids from June 25 through July 24, 2024. Bids were received electronically via PlanetBids on July 24, 2024.

A bid protest was filed by Nationwide Contracting Services, Inc. during the protest period against Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. Following a thorough review, the City found the protest invalid. Consequently, the City recommends awarding the project to Los Angeles Engineering, Inc., as the lowest responsive bidder.

Bid Results Summary
Rank Bidder’s Name Location Base Bid
1 Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. Covina, CA $10,579,350
2 Nationwide Contracting
Services, Inc.

Huntington
Beach, CA $11,420,187
3 Vido Samarzich, Inc. Rancho
Cucamonga, CA $11,778,349
4 Beador Construction Company,
Inc. Costa Mesa, CA $12,514,300
5 Excel Paving Co Long Beach, CA $14,548,836
A total of five bids were received and all were deemed responsive. Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive base bid in the amount of $10,579,350 (Exhibit 2). As specified in the bid documents, the lowest bid shall be determined on the basis of the Base Bid. Based on the bid analysis and a contractor’s reference check, staff recommends awarding the construction contract with the alternate bid to Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. (Exhibit 3).

Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. has not performed work as a prime contractor in the City of Santa Ana within the last five years. However, a reference check was made with other Public Agencies and good reviews were received regarding the quality of work performed by the contractor on the previous projects.

City Council 16 – 3 9/17/2024
Bristol Street Improvements and Widening from Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Project
September 17, 2024

Page 4 ends

Project Delivery
To deliver a complete project, in addition to the construction contract, the estimated total project delivery cost includes a budget allocation for construction administration, inspection, and testing. Construction administration and inspection may be performed by either staff or consultants and includes construction management, inspection of the contractor’s work to ensure contract compliance, workmanship and quality, materials testing, and implementation of the labor requirements.

Any of the allocated construction administration funds not spent are considered project savings and are returned to the respective fund balance upon close out of the project.

In addition to the Construction Contract Bid Amount, staff requests that City Council allocate and authorize a project contingency budget equal to 10% of the Contract Bid Amount. The recommended contingency budget will allow staff to execute contract change orders in the event unexpected conditions arise or if additional work is required to effectively deliver the project.

As indicated in the Cost Analysis (Exhibit 4) and as summarized in the table below, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $13,224,187.

Project Item Total
Construction Contract Bid Amount $10,579,350
Construction Administration $846,348
Inspection $528,967
Testing $211,587
Project Contingencies $1,057,935
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST $13,224,187

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
In 1990, the City Council approved the Bristol Street Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR No. 89-01). Due to minor design modifications an Addendum to the FEIS/EIR was prepared and adopted by City Council on June 3, 2014, pursuant to the California Environmental Act (Exhibit 5).

FISCAL IMPACT
As indicated in the Cost Analysis, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project (13-6792) is $13,224,187. All funds are available for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2024-25 Capital Improvement Program (Exhibit 6). Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be carried forward into FY 2025-26. A proposed carryover of unspent funds will be presented to the City Council for the FY 2025-26 portion of this contract.

City Council 16 – 4 9/17/2024
Bristol Street Improvements and Widening from Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Project
September 17, 2024

Page 5 ends

The proposed contract authorizes staff a maximum of 10% in contingencies for construction contract change orders. Staff will return to City Council for authorization and appropriation of additional contingency if necessary.

With the approval of the requested appropriation adjustment, a portion of the accumulated fund balance will be appropriated for spending in the Select Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building Account (No. 05917661-66220), Revenue appropriated to this account is derived from the sale of land acquired from right-of-way acquisitions per procedures set by OCTA Bristol Corridor Improvement.

The sale of land portion of the fund balance is estimated to be $6,228,834 for Fiscal Year 2024-25, which is sufficient to allow for the recommended appropriation.

Additionally, a portion of the accumulated fund balance will be appropriated for spending in the New Transportation System Improvement Area F, Improvements Other Than Building Account (No. 03517660-66220). The spendable portion of the fund balance is estimated to be $1,226,165 for Fiscal Year 2024-2025, which is sufficient to allow for the recommended appropriation of $1,200,000.

With the approval of the requested appropriation adjustment, $656,000 in Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) DEMO grant funds will be recognized in the Select Street Construction, Federal Grant-Indirect revenue account (05917002- 52001) and appropriated for spending in the Select Street Construction, Improvements Other Than Building Account (No. 05917660-66220). (Exhibit 7) The following table summarizes the funds budgeted for expenditure to deliver the construction of this project:

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit
- Account No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account No.

Description
Amount

CURRENT BUDGET
2024-25 03217663-66220
(13-6792)
CTFP Grant –
Measure M
Street
Construction
Measure M2
Competitive Street,
Improvements Other
Than Building
$5,239,044
2024-25 05917660-66220
(13-6792)
BCIP Grant –
Select Street
Construction
Select Street
Construction,
Improvements Other
Than Building
$793,760
2024-25 03517660-66220
(13-6792)
New
Transportation
System
New Transportation
System Improvement
$130,000
City Council 16 – 5 9/17/2024
Bristol Street Improvements and Widening from Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Project
September 17, 2024

Page 6 ends

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit
- Account No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account No.

Description
Amount
Improvement
Area F
Area F, Improvements
Other Than Building
2024-25 05917663-66220
(13-6792)
Select Street
Construction
Gas Tax HUTA 2103,
Improvements Other
Than Building
$1,861,449

APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT
2024-25 05917661-66220
(13-6792)
Select Street
Construction
OCTA Bristol St
Corridor
Improvements,
Improvements Other
Than Building
$3,343,934
2024-25 03517660-66220
(13-6792)
New
Transportation
System
Improvement
Area F
New Transportation
System Improvement
Area F, Improvements
Other Than Building
$1,200,000
2024-25 05917660-66220
(13-6792)
Select Street
Construction
Select Street
Construction,
Improvements Other
Than Building
$656,000
Total $13,224,187

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Location Map & Concept Plans

2. Bid Proposal

3. Construction Contract

4. Cost Analysis

5. Environmental Determination

6. FY 2024-25 Capital Improvement Program Sheet

7. Finance Letter – DEMO6L-5063(146)
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council 16 – 6 9/17/2024
PWA

SANTA ANA
PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Project No. 13-6792:

Bristol Street Improvements PH. 3A from Civic
Center Drive to Washington Avenue Location Map
EXHIBIT 1
City Council 16 – 7 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 8 9/17/2024
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 16 – 9 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 10 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 11 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 12 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 13 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 14 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 15 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 16 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 17 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 18 9/17/2024
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 16 – 19 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 20 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 21 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 22 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 23 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 24 9/17/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA REBID

Vido Samazich - President
Vido L. Samarzich - Vice President
Monika Samazich - Secretary
City Council P-14 of P-30 16 – 25 9/17/2024
EXHIBIT 4
Construction Contract 10,579,350.00 $
Contract Administration, Inspection and Testing 1,586,902.00 $ Contingencies 1,057,935.00 $
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 13,224,187.00
CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT NO. 13-6792: Bristol Street Improvements and Widening from Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

COST ANALYSIS
City Council 16 – 26 9/17/2024
ROH - 04107/15
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-015

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA

APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 89-01 FOR THE

BRISTOL STREET WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN CIVIC CENTER

DRIVE AND WASHINGTON AVENUE (PHASE IIIA)

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows:

A. On November 19, 1990, the City Council approved the Final Environmental Impact Statement / Environmental Impact Report (EIS 89-01) for the widening of a 3.9-mile segment of Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane, hereinafter referred to as the "Project".

B. City Council has been asked to approve the commencement of Phase IIIA of the Project, widening Bristol Street from Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue. Phase IIIA includes minor design modifications to the Project approved in EIS 89-01.

C. On April 7, 2015, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana considered the request for approval of the Addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Study/ Environmental Impact Report (EIS 89-01 ).

Section 2. The City Council previously approved and adopted Final Environmental Impact Study/ Environmental Impact Report (EIS 89-01 ). In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), an Addendum to EIS 89-01 was prepared for Phase IIIA of the Bristol Street Widening Project A true and correct copy of the Addendum is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. The City Council reviewed the information contained in the Addendum, which includes reference materials, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference, and as a result of its consideration and the evidence presented at the hearings on this matter, determined that, as required pursuant to CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, the Addendum adequately addresses the expected environmental impacts of this Project. Based upon the studies, the City Council determines that there are no new significant impacts or any increases in the severity of the impacts previously identified in the original FEIS/EIR.

Section 3. The City Council hereby certifies and approves the Addendum to EIR 89-01, and directs that any necessary Notice of Determination be prepared and filed with the County Clerk of the County of Orange in the matter required by Law.

Resolution No. 2015-015

Page 1 ends

EXHIBIT 6
City Council 16 – 27 9/17/2024
Section 4. These decisions are based upon the Request for Council Action dated April 7, 2015, and exhibits attached thereto; the public comments; and, the Final Environmental Impact Study / Environmental Impact Report ( EIS 89 -01), all of which are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 5. This decision rendered by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana is final and is subject to judicial review pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 1094. 6.

ADOPTED this 7t" day of April, 2015.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sonia 1`3e arvalljo, City Attorney
0 AYES: Councilmembers: Amezcua Benavides, Martinez Pulido Reyna, Tinaiero ( 6)
NOES: Councilmembers: None ( 0)
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: Sarmiento ( 1)
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: None (0)
Resolution No. 2015 -015
Page of 2 of 9
City Council 16 – 28 9/17/2024

CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, MARIA D. HUIZAR, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2015 -014 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on April 7, 2015.

Date: 4 21wd2
Clerk of the Council
City of Santa Ana
Resolution No. 2015 -015

Page 3 ends

PLEASE SEE LASERFICHE
RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -015

FOR EXHIBIT A
Resolution No. 2015 -015
City Council 16 – 30 9/17/2024 Page 4 of 4
January 20, 2015

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Bristol Street Widening Project
Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue (Phase IIIA)
Environmental Impact Report Addendum
PROJECTNUMBER:
102866
PROJECT OONTAOr.

Court EMAIL: Morgan
court mo gan@powarang,corn
PHONE.• 714.507.2764
VPOWER 14 ENGINEERS Exhibit A
City Council 16 – 31 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Environmental Impact Report Addendum

PREPARED FOR' CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA, M -36
SANTA ANA, CA 92702
PREPARED BY' POWER ENGINEERS, INC.
731 EAST BALL ROAD, SUITE 100
ANAHEIM, CA 92805
OFFICE: (714) 507 -2700
FAX (714) 507 -2799
City Council 16 – 32 9/17/2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. 0 INTRODUCTION

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue 1 1. 1 PURPOSE OF AN ADDENDUM ................................................................... 2

1. 2 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................................. 4

1. 2. 1 Existing Land Uses ........................................................................... 4

1. 3 PROJECT BACKGROUND ........................................................................ 11

1. 3. 1 Approved 1990 Final EIR/EIS ...................................................... I 1

1. 3. 2 Adopted Transportation Improvement Program ............................ l l

1. 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................... 12

1. 4. 1 Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA Project Area ............................ 12

1. 4. 2 Property Acquisition ........................................................................ 12

1. 4. 3 Changes as Compared to the Approved Project .............................. 17

1. 4.4 Construction Timeframe .................................................................. 18

1. 5 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS ..................................................................... 18

2. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ........................................................ ............................. 25

2. 1 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................... ............................... 25

3. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ............................................... ............................. 26

3. 1 AESTHETICS ........................................................................................... 26

3. 2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................... 28

3. 3 AIR QUALITY ......................................................................................... 29

3. 4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ...................................................................... 35

3. 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES ........................................................................... 37

3. 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ............................................................................. 38

3. 7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS .............................................................. 40

3. 8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS .............................................. 41

3. 9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ....................................................... 43

3. 10 LAND USE AND PLANNING .................................................................... 46

3. 11 MINERAL RESOURCES ........................................................................... 47

3. 12 NOISE ....................................................................................................... 48

3. 13 POPULATION AND HOUSING .................................................................. 49

3. 14 PUBLIC SERVICES .................................................................................. 51

3. 15 RECREATION .......................................................................................... 52

3. 16 TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC .................................................................. 52

3. 17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ........................................................ 54

3. 18 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ............................................ 56

4. 0 REFERENCES .......................................................................................... ............................. 57 FIGURES:

FIGURE REGIONAL LOCATION ........................................................................... .............................. 5 FIGURE 2 PROJECT LOCATION ............................................................................. ............................... 7 FIGURE 3 EXISTING LAND USE ( 1990 FEIS/ EIR) ................................................ ............................... 9 FIGURE 4 PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS .................................................................. ............................... 15 FIGURE 5 PROPOSED PROJECT LANE GEOMETRICS ........................................... ............................... 19 FIGURE 6 BRISTOL STREET /CIVIC CENTER DRIVE INTERSECTION ( 1990 FINAL EIS /EIR) .................. 21 FIGURE 7 BRISTOL STREET /OTHER INTERSECTIONS ( 1990 FINAL EIS /EIR) ...... ............................... 23 ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE i City Council 16 – 33 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue TABLES:

TABLE 1 PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS .................................................................. ............................... 13 TABLE 2 PROJECT RELATED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS ................................ ............................... 31 TABLE 3 YEAR 2015 WITH AND WITHOUT PROJECT AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS ......................... 31 TABLE 4 YEAR 2035 WITH AND WITHOUT PROJECT AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS ......................... 32 TABLE 5 LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS ANALYSIS FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES... 33 TABLE 6 CO HOTSPOT ANALYSIS ( PPM) .......................................................... ............................... 34 TABLE 7 SCHOOLS WITHIN THE PHASE IIIA PROJECT AREA ........................... ............................... 41 APPENDICES:

APPENDIX A MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE ii City Council 16 – 34 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
AAQS ambient air quality standards
ADA American with Disabilities Act of 1990
APE Area of Potential Effect
AQMP Air Quality Management Plant
BMPs best management practices
CAAQS California ambient air quality standards
CalEEMod SCAQMD California Emissions Estimator Model
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CO carbon monoxide
CO2 carbon dioxide
CPRC California Public Resources Code
CRHR California Register of Historical Resources
CWA Clean Water Act
dB decibels
dB(A) A- weighted decibels
EPA US Environmental Protection Agency
FEIS /EIR Final Environmental Impact Statement / Environmental Impact Report FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FTIP Federal Transportation Improvement Program
GC General Commercial
GHG greenhouse gas
1 - 405 San Diego Freeway
LOS Level of Service
LSTs Localized Significance Thresholds
mph miles per hour
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
NO2 nitrogen dioxide
NOx nitrogen oxides
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
03 ozone
OCTD Orange County Transit District
PM10 particulate matter less than less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter PM2,5 particulate matter less than less than or equal to 2.5 microns in diameter ppm parts per million
Project Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIB — 176' Street to Washington Ave. Project ROG reactive organic gases
RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Program
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SIPS state implementation plans
Sox sulfur oxides
SP1 Specific Plan
SR -22 State Route 22
SWPPP Stonnwater Pollution Prevention Plan
TCMs Transportation Control Measures
UBC Uniform Building Code
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) W PAGE iii City Council 16 – 35 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLYLEFT BLANK
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE iv City Council 16 – 36 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

1. 0 INTRODUCTION
This Addendum has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended, to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the proposed changes to the widening of Bristol Street, from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane as proposed in the Project Final Environmental Impact Statement / Environmental Impact Report ( FEIS /EIR) approved in 1990 ( FHWA-CA- EIS- 89 -01- F; SCH No. 87071509).

This Addendum focuses on the segment of Bristol Street between Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue ( Phase IIIA, or Project) and is limited to the proposed improvements to this segment. This Addendum provides an assessment of potential environmental impacts associated with minor design modifications and the issue of climate change which was not addressed in the previously prepared and certified FEIS /EIR.

Design modifications to the Project, since approval of the 1990 FEIS /EIR, that are addressed in this Addendum include the following:

The 1990 FEIS/EIR, using decommissioned noise methodology, recommended noise barriers soundwalls) at all easterly parcel boundaries currently fronting the east side of Bristol Street between Civic Center Drive and Washington Avenue. However, using current noise modeling methodology (RBF Consulting 2014), noise abatement in the form of noise barriers is not required for the Phase IIIA Project.

For purposes of aesthetic treatment and enhancement, the proposed Project would install an approximately 8 -foot high block wall at approximately the same location where soundwalls were previously recommended ( as addressed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR).

The proposed Project increases the total right -of -way width from 120 feet to 128 feet. The proposed Project right -of -way cross - section would maintain a curb -to -curb width of 100 feet, would accommodate a 7 -foot wide bike lane on each side of the roadway, and would not affect the number or width of vehicular travel lanes as compared to the right -of -way cross- section addressed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. However, the proposed Project right -of -way cross section, as compared to the right -of -way cross section addressed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR, would reduce the width of the sidewalks from 10 to 8 feet and also accommodate a 6 -foot wide parkway on each side of Bristol Street to separate pedestrian and vehicular travel; a parkway was not included as part of the roadway cross section addressed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR. Acquisition of property resulting from the proposed Project right -of -way is accounted for in this analysis.

Addition of a westbound right -turn lane on Washington Avenue at Bristol Street.

Addition of a cul -de -sac at 9th Street on the west side of Bristol Street.

Full and partial acquisition on both sides of Bristol Street between Civic Center Drive and Washington Avenue.

Changes in land use as part of the Bristol Specific Plan Addendum, as follows:
o Assessor Parcel Numbers ( APNs) 405- 262 -21, - 22, - 23, - 24, - 25, - 26, - 27, - 28,- 29, - 30, - 31, - 32, and - 33; and 405- 274 -09, - 10, 41, -12, and - 13) — Land use change from Park to Park with Commercial option.

Additionally, the topic of greenhouse gas ( GFIG) emissions was not addressed in the previously approved 1990 FEIS /EIR as this topic was not a subject matter that required evaluation pursuant to CEQA at that time. As such, this Addendum analyzes the effects of GHG emissions associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 1 City Council 16 – 37 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTREPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue This Addendum to the previously certified 1990 FEIS /EIR has been prepared because Project - related modifications to the Bristol Street alignment do not trigger the need for further environmental analysis in a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR under the requirements CEQA ( refer to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163, respectively).

1. 1 Purpose of an Addendum
Under CEQA, when an EIR has been certified for a project, no Subsequent EIR may be required for that project unless the lead agency determines, based upon substantial evidence, that one or more specified circumstances has occurred. Only if one or more of the following circumstances arises is a Subsequent EIR required, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162:

1. ( 1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revision of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity ofpreviously identified significant effects;

2. ( 2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revision of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or

3. ( 3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following:

A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR;
B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. ( CEQA Guidelines Section 15162[ a])
A Supplement to an EIR (or Supplemental EIR), which is narrower in scope than a Subsequent EIR, may be prepared if any of the above criteria apply, but "[ o] nly minor changes or additions would be necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation" ( CEQA Guidelines Section 15163[ a][ 2]). In the absence of the need to prepare either a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR, an Addendum may be prepared. More specifically, CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 states:
a) The lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.
b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 2 City Council 16 – 38 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration. d) The decision making body shall consider the addendum with the final EIR or adopted negative declaration prior to malting a decision on the project. e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency' s findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence.

This Addendum to the previously certified FEIS/EIR for the approved Project has been prepared because the evaluation of the proposed modifications does not result in any of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent or Supplemental EIS /EIR. Although the proposed modifications would result in development that differs from that in the 1990 FEIS /EIR, those modifications do not trigger the need for preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR under the criteria listed in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163, respectively. Sections 2. 0 and 3. 0 of this Addendum demonstrate that no substantial changes are proposed in the approved Project or have occurred in the area of the Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA Project that will require major revisions to the previously certified 1990 FEIS /EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Specifically, the proposed modifications, as compared to the 1990 FEIS/EIR, do not result in new or substantially greater significant impacts because the scale and nature of the proposed modifications are sufficiently similar to that analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR such that the impacts of the proposed modifications are within the levels and types of environmental impacts disclosed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

In addition, no substantial changes in circumstances under Section 15162( a)( 2) have occurred since the certification of the 1990 FEIS /EIR for the approved Project that would result in new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, since the background environmental conditions have not significantly changed since that time. The City of Santa Ana has received no information indicating there has been a substantial change in any circumstances that would result in a new or substantially greater significant impact.

Furthermore, no new information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time of the 1990 FEIS/EIR preparation, has been revealed that shows new or substantially greater significant impacts would result ( see CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)( 3)). In addition, there are no new or different mitigation measures or alternatives that would substantially reduce one or more significant impacts of the approved Project but that are not adopted. The proposed modifications do not identify or require adoption of any further mitigation measures or alternatives beyond those provided in the certified 1990 FEIS /EIR for the approved Project, since additional mitigation measures are either not necessary or not feasible, and the alternatives analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR represent a reasonable range as required pursuant to CEQA [see CEQA Guidelines Section 15162( a)( 3)].

This Addendum relies on the certified 1990 FEIS/EIR and the related administrative record, in addition to the additional documentation included to support the Addendum, including the appendices. The Addendum is to be included or attached to the 1990 FEIS /EIR and is not to be considered as an independent or separate document.

As this Addendum does not identify new or substantially greater significant impacts, circulation for public review and comment is not necessary pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164( c). However, the City Council will consider and adopt or reject this Addendum at a public meeting ( refer to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164( d)). The findings of the City Council in its resolution of adoption of this Addendum, if adopted, will reflect this Addendum which provides the basis and substantial evidence for ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 3 City Council 16 – 39 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue the decision not to prepare a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR ( refer to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164( e)).

1. 2 Project Location
The proposed Project includes a segment of Bristol Street between Civic Center Drive and Washington Avenue in the City of Santa Ana. The City of Santa Ana, located within the County of Orange, is surrounded by the Cities of Tustin, Orange, Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley, and Garden Grove. The proposed Project site is located approximately 1. 5 miles north of the San Diego Freeway ( I -405) and approximately three miles south of State Route 22 ( SR -22). Refer to Figures 1 and 2 for the regional map and Project location map, respectively.

1. 2. 1 Existing Land Uses
The Project area and surrounding vicinity is located within an urbanized area of the City of Santa Ana.

Existing land use along the Project corridor consists of commercial and single- and multi - family residences. Figure 3 illustrates existing land use as identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (0 1/ 19/ 20 15) YU PAGE 4 City Council 16 – 40 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTREPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue a [till0 =i t1 * 11910 l_1 qOPEN i [t] 01
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 5 City Council 16 – 41 9/17/2024
s, r k
yI KERN- CO. -

OREGON IDAHO
Lalfcaster & 95 .
a
NEVADA dUTTAH s< I
Nal o bc, m rrtsnn '%
CALIFORNIA almdale Ad fan {o
Ir { J
15 0 ill
nt
Hes aria TLOS ANGELES CO P
1 Aya
j
Ion
r
j}
LEGEND

PROJECT LOCATION
t
Y
FIGURE 1

REGIONAL LOCATION

BRISTOL STREET WIDENING PROJECT

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE TO

WASHINGTON AVENUE

PHASE IIIA)
N
0Miles
0 5 10 15
t
Y
FIGURE 1

REGIONAL LOCATION

BRISTOL STREET WIDENING PROJECT

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE TO

WASHINGTON AVENUE

PHASE IIIA)
City Council 16 – 42 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLYLEFTBLANK
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 6 City Council 16 – 43 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue FIGURE 2 PROJECT LOCATION
305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 7 City Council 16 – 44 9/17/2024
SOURCE ARCGIS ONLINE, NATGEO WORLD MAP, ACCESSED 1119/2015 City Council 16 – 45 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLYLEFT BLANK
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 8 City Council 16 – 46 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street lMdening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue FIGURE 3 EXISTING LAND USE ( 1990 FEIS /EIR)
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 9 City Council 16 – 47 9/17/2024
uj 0WOW
W
imZ W z M E=
Mu 9W. 7,
iz

EEFFFIHIM
LUm
j >. LUIL
rk
ff0 O
Wjj
oz
aQ
zLL
UO
OKmm
City Council 16 – 48 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLYLEFT BLANK
ANA 305- 0t I ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/2015) YU PAGE 10 City Council 16 – 49 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

1. 3 Project Background

1. 3. 1 Approved 1990 Final EIWEIS
The City of Santa Ana General Plan designates Bristol Street as a Major Arterial Highway traveling in a north -south direction. As a result of significant growth and traffic congestion on Bristol Street, the City of Santa Ana, in the late 1980s, proposed to widen Bristol Street from a four -lane roadway to a six -lane arterial in accordance with adopted County of Orange and City of Santa Ana standards for a Major Arterial Highway. A joint EIS /EIR was prepared and approved by the City of Santa Ana and the California Department of Transportation ( Caltrans) for the widening of Bristol Street in 1990. The 1990 Project entailed a 3. 9 -mile segment of Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane. Due to significant costs associated with construction and availability of funding, the street widening Project was divided into three phases; Phase I, from Wainer Avenue north to First Street; Phase II, consisting of the widening and reconstruction of the bridge which crosses Santiago Creek ( northerly limits of the street widening Project); and Phase III, between First Street and Memory Lane. Subsequently, and also due to funding programming and availability, the Phase III segment has been further divided into two separate segments: Phase IIIA, Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue (the subject of this Addendum),; and Phase IIIB Washington Avenue to 17th Street. The Bristol Street widening segments, as described above, operate independently; that is, operation of one segment is not dependent on another.

The 1990 FEIS /EIR (SCH No. 87071509) was approved on November 19, 1990. The 1990 FEIS /EIR and associated technical studies, incorporated herein by reference, documented the environmental impacts of widening Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane in the City of Santa Ana. As stated in the 1990 FEIS /EIR, the purpose and goals of the Bristol Street Widening Project were to:

1. Provide sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate current and future traffic demand.

2. Improve the performance and safety of the roadway for the benefit of the motoring public.

3. To reduce current and projected future delays experienced at major intersections and to design intersections to function at acceptable Levels of Service ( LOS).

4. To design the roadway in manner conducive to the provision of public transportation, namely bus service provided by the Orange County Transit District (OCTD).

1. 3.2 Adopted Transportation Improvement Program
The Approved Project is fully funded and included as project number ORA125 in the regional emissions analysis conducted by Southern California Association of Governments ( SLAG) for the conforming 2013 Federal Transportation Improvement Program ( FTIP) adopted by SCAG on September 19, 2012 and approved by FHWA on December 14, 2012. As provided in the FLIP, the Approved Project description reads as follows:

BRISTOL ST ( WARNER TO MEMORY LANE) WIDEN FROM 4 TO 6 LANES ( IMPV AT

BRISTOL /WARNER ( ADD NBIEBISB THRU LNS, WB RT TRN LN) AND BRISTOL /FIRST ADD NBISB THRULNS; SB LFTIRTITRNLNS
The Phase IIIA project is a component of the Approved Project. The Phase IIIA Project' s design concept and scope have not changed significantly from what was analyzed in the RTIP and FTIP. This analysis found that the plan and, therefore, the individual projects contained in the plan, are conforming projects, and would have air quality impacts consistent with those identified in the state implementation plans SIPS) for achieving the National Ambient Air Quality Standards ( NAAQS). FHWA determined the RTIP to conform to the SIP.
305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01 /19/ 2015) YU PAGE 11 City Council 16 – 50 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue The Phase IIIA Project' s open to the public year is consistent with (within the same regional emission analysis period as) the construction completion date identified in the FTIP and /or RTP. The FTIP gives priority to eligible Transportation Control Measures ( TCMs) identified in the SIP and provides sufficient funds to provide for their implementation. FHWA determined the TIP to conform to the SIP on December 2010.

The Phase IIIA Project is also included in the 2013 TIP adopted by SCAG on September 6, 2012 and approved by FHWA on December 14, 2012.

1. 4 Project Description

1. 4. 1 Bristol Street Widening Phase 111A Project Area Phase IIIA of the Bristol Street Widening Project involves the widening of Bristol Street between Civic Center Drive and Washington Avenue from four lanes to six lanes with a 128 -foot wide right -of -way cross section including a 14 -foot wide raised landscaped median; three 12 -foot wide through travel lanes in each direction; a 7 -foot wide Class II bike lane on each side of the roadway; a 6 -foot wide parkway; and 8 - foot wide sidewalks with curb ramps for wheelchair access ( pursuant to American with Disabilities Act of 1990 [ ADA] requirements) on both sides of the roadway. As Bristol Street approaches the intersections, the landscaped center median would taper to accommodate right -turn pockets and left -turn lanes in each direction. The proposed Project also includes the addition of a westbound right -turn lane on Washington Avenue at Bristol Street and removal of the eastbound through movement on Washington Avenue at Bristol Street to match the existing condition. Furthermore, a cul -de -sac would be constructed at 9th Street on the west side of Bristol Street.

Street signs and utilities including electric power lines, telephone poles, and street lighting would be relocated to new locations within the Project area along Bristol Street. Street furniture, including benches and bus shelters, would be provided at bus stop locations. Affected trees would be replanted.

During the one -year construction period ( anticipated to be mid -2015 to mid- 2016), one lane in each direction would remain open and existing driveway accesses along Bristol Street would be retained at all times. The maximum excavation depth would be three feet for roadway excavation, and approximately 10 feet for utility /drainage excavation.

1. 4.2 Property Acquisition
As listed in Table 1, a total of 20 properties ( parcels) would be fully acquired as a result of the proposed widening of Bristol Street between Civic Center Drive and Washington Avenue (refer to Figure 4 for the locations of affected properties). More specifically, the proposed Project, and its associated right -of -way requirements, would result in the full acquisition by the City of Santa Ana, of 17 single - family residential parcels; two parcels representing commercial /utility uses; and one parcel characterized as office -type use.

Parcel 405- 262 -26 is within the project limits; however, this parcel is owned by the City. The acquisitions would comply with policies pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as implemented by the City of Santa Ana. The increase in right -of -way width associated with the proposed Project from 120 feet, as addressed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR, to 128 feet would not result in a difference in the number of properties that would be acquired as a result of the proposed improvements.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 12 City Council 16 – 51 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue TABLE 1 PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS
qPN ADPIESkIST1N LANDS U5E AGQUIfl9N,TF p131fEd 710E71," 004 - 111 - 18 1306 W. 11th St. Single- Family Residential Partial 304 004- 111 - 22 1302 W. 11th St. Single- Family Residential Full 6, 983 004 - 112 -33 1305 W. 11th St. Single- Family Residential Partial 267 004 - 112 -35 1302 W. 12th St. Sinple- Family Residential Full 6, 702 004 - 112 -36 11301 W. 11th St. Sinple- Family Residential Full 6, 864 004 - 113 -19 1305 W. 12th St. Single- Family Residential Full 6, 007 004 - 113 -34 1301 W. 12th St. Single- Family Residential Full 6, 103 004 - 121 -12 1307 W. 10th St. Single- Family Residential Full 6, 270 004 - 121 -18 1301 W. 10th St. Single - Family Residential Full 7, 106 004 - 122 -18 1311 W. 9th St. Single - Family Residential Partial 92 004 - 123 -11 1312 W. 9th St. Single - Family Residential Partial 34 405 - 262 -21 827 N. Bristol St. Single - Family Residential Full 6, 951 405 - 262 -22 829 N. Bristol St. Single - Family Residential Full 6, 751 405 - 262 -23 907 N. Bristol St. Single - Family Residential Full 6, 726 405 - 262 -24 911 N. Bristol St. Single - Family Residential Full 7, 327 405- 262 -25 917 N. Bristol St. Single - Family Residential Full 9, 970 405 - 262 -26 921 N. Bristol St. Single - Family Residential Owned by City' 0 405 - 262 -28 1003 N. Bristol St. Single - Family Residential Full 7, 517 405 - 262 -29 1005 N. Bristol St, Single - Family Residential Full 7, 406 405 - 262 -30 1009 N. Bristol St, Single - Family Residential Full 7, 271 405 - 262 -31 1015 R Bristol St. Single - Family Residential Full 7, 270 405 - 262 -32 1019 N. Bristol St. Single - Family Residential Full 7, 269 405 - 262 -33 1023 N. Bristol St. Office ( Optometrist) Full 7, 269 405 - 274 -10 1111 N. Bristol St. Commercial (Strip Mall) Full 34,264 044 - 113 -35 1220 N. Bristol St. Commercial (Strip Mall) Partial 3, 500 405 - 274 -12 1221 N. Bristol St. Commercial /Utility
Restaurant/Substation)
Full 6, 122
I Property acquired by City due to either ( 1) property tax default or ( 2) in accordance with Measure M guidelines for acquisition due to short sale or foreclosure, ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 13 City Council 16 – 52 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLYLEFT BLANK
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 14 City Council 16 – 53 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTREPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue FIGURE 4 PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01119/ 2015) YU PAGE 15 City Council 16 – 54 9/17/2024
t°L
L 4
1 City Council 16 – 55 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase II/A— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLYLEFT BLANK
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 16 City Council 16 – 56 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

1. 4. 3 Changes as Compared to the Approved Project
It should be noted that Project phasing has been revised from the original three phases identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR. Construction phasing of the entire Project segment has been further subdivided as follows:

St. Andrew Place to McFadden Avenue (Constructed in 2002) Elm Street to Memory Lane ( Constructed in 2003)
Pine Street to 3rd Street ( Constructed in 2009)
Phase I: McFadden Avenue to Pine Street ( Constructed in 2011)' Phase II: 3rd Street to Civic Center Drive (Constructed in 2014) Phase IIIA: Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue
Phase IIIB: Washington Avenue to 17d' Street
Phase IV: Warner Avenue to St. Andrew Place
Phase V: 17"' Street to Elm Street
The proposed street widening design configuration for the current Phase IIIA segment ( proposed Project addressed herein) differs from the original configuration of the 1990 FEIS /EIR, as follows:

The 1990 FEIS /EIR, using decommissioned noise methodology, recommended noise barriers soundwalls) at all easterly parcel boundaries currently fronting the east side of Bristol Street between Civic Center Drive and Washington Avenue. However, using current noise modeling methodology (RBF Consulting 2014), noise abatement in the form of noise barriers is not required for the Phase IIIA Project.

The proposed Project increases the total right -of -way width from 120 feet to 128 feet. The proposed Project right -of -way cross - section would maintain a curb -to -curb width of 100 feet, would accommodate a 7 -foot wide bike lane on each side of the roadway, and would not affect the number or width of vehicular travel lanes as compared to the right -of -way cross - section addressed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR. However, the proposed Project right -of -way cross section, as compared to the right -of -way cross section addressed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR, would reduce the width of the sidewalks from 10 to 8 feet and also accommodate a 6 -foot wide parkway on each side of Bristol Street to separate pedestrian and vehicular travel; a parkway was not included as part of the roadway cross section addressed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR. Acquisition of property resulting from the proposed Project right -of -way is accounted for in this analysis.

Addition of a westbound right -turn lane on Washington Avenue at Bristol Street.

Removal of eastbound through movement on Washington Avenue at Bristol Street to match existing condition.

Addition of a cul -de -sac at 9th Street on the west side of Bristol Street.

Full and partial acquisition on both sides of Bristol Street between Civic Center Drive and Washington Avenue.

Changes in land use as part of the Bristol Specific Plan Addendum, as follows:

Phase numbers were assigned to the Bristol Street Widening Project subsequent to cancelation of the ConterLine Light Rail Transit Project and associated reallocation of funding from that canceled project to the Bristol Street Widening Project ANA 305- 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 17 City Council 16 – 57 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 405- 262 -21, - 22, - 23, - 24, -25, - 26, - 27, - 28, - 29, - 30, - 31, - 32, and - 33; and 405- 274 -09, - 10, - 11, - 12, and - 13) — Land use change from Park to Park with Commercial option.

The proposed Project lane configuration is shown on Figure 5 ( Proposed Project Lane Geometries), whereas the intersection lane configurations from the original approved 1990 FEIS /EIR are shown on Figures 6 and 7. The proposed block wall, as described above, is also illustrated on Figure 5.

An assessment of construction and Project related GHG emissions was also not addressed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR, and as a result is addressed in this Addendum.

1. 4.4 Construction Timeframe
Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would occur following acquisition of the required parcels. Construction of the proposed Project is anticipated to begin in mid -2015 and be completed within approximately one year (mid - 2016).

1. 5 Discretionary Actions
This Addendum must be adopted by the City of Santa Ana City Council as to its adequacy in complying with the requirements of CEQA and the previously approved 1990 FEIS /EIR. The City Council will consider the information contained in the Addendum and the 1990 FEIS/EIR in making a decision to approve or deny the proposed Project.

ANA 305 -011 (PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/2015) YU PAGE 18 City Council 16 – 58 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue FIGURE 5 PROPOSED PROJECT LANE GEOMETRICS
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 19 City Council 16 – 59 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLYLEFT BLANK
305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 20 City Council 16 – 60 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 61 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue FIGURE 6 BRISTOL STREET /CIVIC CENTER DRIVE INTERSECTION ( 1990 FINAL EIS /EIR) ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 21 City Council 16 – 62 9/17/2024
b2
I
I , I lli it ITtl 19 = I__
Y1
Bristol Street

SOURCE,

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, PROPOSED WIDENING OF BRISTOL STREET FROM WARNER AVENUE TO MEMORY LANE, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA. WILDAN ASSOCIATES. 1990, 4 NOATH
FIGURE 6

BRISTOL STREETICIVIC

CENTER DRIVE INTERSECTION
1990 FINAL EISIEIR)

BRISTOL STREET

WIDENING PROJECT

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE TO

WASHINGTON AVENUE

PHASE IIIA)
A
I
I , I lli it ITtl 19 = I__
Y1
Bristol Street

SOURCE,

BRISTOL STREETICIVIC

CENTER DRIVE INTERSECTION
1990 FINAL EISIEIR)

BRISTOL STREET

WIDENING PROJECT

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE TO

WASHINGTON AVENUE

PHASE IIIA)
City Council 16 – 63 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFTBLANK
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 22 City Council 16 – 64 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue FIGURE 7 BRISTOL STREET /OTHER INTERSECTIONS ( 1990 FINAL EIS /EIR) ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 23 City Council 16 – 65 9/17/2024
4---- 140
L' L
I
12' , 12' I
19'
Bristol Street

SOURCE', FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT /ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, PROPOSED WIDENING OF BRISTOL STREET FROM WARNER AVENUE TO MEMORY LANE, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA. WILDAN ASSOCIATES. 1990.

NORTH
FIGURE 7

BRISTOL STREETI

OTHER INTERSECTIONS
1990 FINAL EISIEIR)

BRISTOL STREET

WIDENING PROJECT

CIVIC CENTER DRIVE TO

WASHINGTON AVENUE

PHASE IIIA)
City Council 16 – 66 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLYLETTBLANK
305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 24 City Council 16 – 67 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

2. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST

2. 1 Background
Project Title: Bristol Street Widening, Phase IIIA Project.

Lead Agency Name and Address:

City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, M -36
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Contact Person and Phone Number:

Kenny Nguyen, P.E.

Senior Civil Engineer
City of Santa Ana
714) 647 -5632
Project Location: Bristol Street from Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue in the City of Santa Ana.

Project Sponsor' s Name and Address:

City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, M -36
Santa Ana, CA 92702
General Plan Designation: General Commercial ( GC)
Zoning: Specific Plan ( SPI)
Description of Project:

The City of Santa Ana is proposing to widen the Bristol Street between Civic Center Drive and Washington Avenue from four lanes to six lanes with a 128 -foot wide right-of-way cross section including a 14 -foot wide raised landscaped median; three 12 -foot wide through travel lanes in each direction; a 7 -foot wide Class II bike lane on each side of the roadway; a 6 -foot wide parkway; and 8 - foot wide sidewalks with curb ramps for wheelchair access ( pursuant to American with Disabilities Act of 1990 [ ADA] requirements) on both sides of the roadway. As Bristol Street approaches the intersections, the landscaped center median would taper to accommodate right -turn pockets and left -turn lanes in each direction. The proposed Project also includes the addition of a westbound right -turn lane on Washington Avenue at Bristol Street and removal of the eastbound through movement on Washington Avenue at Bristol Street to match the existing condition. Furthermore, a cul- de- sac would be constructed at 9th Street on the west side of Bristol Street. The proposed Project would also install an approximately 8 - foothigh block wall at approximately the same location where the soundwall was previously recommended as addressed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR). The widening would require fall acquisitions of 20 parcels fronting Bristol Street as detailed in Table 1 ( Property Acquisitions) of this Addendum.

Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:

The Project site is located within a fully developed urban area within the City of Santa Ana. Areas surrounding the Project site consist of various urban uses such as single- and multi - family residences and commercial and retail uses.

Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required ( e. g., permits, financing, or participation agreement): City of Santa Ana.

ANA 305- 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 25 City Council 16 – 68 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

3. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES
This section describes the effects of the proposed Project as compared to those identified in the previously approved 1990 FEIS /EIR document, and to existing conditions and any changes in regulatory setting since the previously approved 1990 FEIS /EIR. Furthermore, this section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Project. The issue areas evaluated in this document include the following, pursuant to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, and have been modified to evaluate the proposed Project changes for which an FEIS/EIR has been previously approved (in 1990) to assist in the determination of the need for a supplemental EIS /EIR or an Addendum.

The modified Initial Study checklist, comparing the effects of the Project modifications as compared to those analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR, is found in Appendix A.

Aesthetics
Agricultural and Forestry Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology and Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Hydrology/Water Quality
Land Use
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population and Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation /Traffic
Utilities /Service Systems
Mandatory Findings of Significance
A summary of impacts of the previously approved Project and the mitigation measures imposed is provided along with an analysis of the potential impacts resulting from the proposed Project and whether those impacts substantially exceeds those discussed in the previously approved 1990 FEIS/EIR.

3. 1 Aesthetics
This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsections A - Landform Modification, G - Urban Landscaping, J - Light and Glare, and K - Aesthetic Considerations of the previously approved 1990 FEIS /EIR. a.) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? The proposed Project would not result in any significant modifications or changes from the previously approved 1990 FEIS /EIR. The Project is located within a highly developed urban area of the City of Santa Ana. No scenic vistas are located within the Project area. No impact to scenic vistas would result from the proposed Project.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 26 City Council 16 – 69 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue b.) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
There are no state- designated scenic highways within the Project area, nor is the Project area visible from any scenic highways. No impacts are anticipated in this regard.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
c.) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of'the site and its surroundings? The proposed Project is located in a highly urbanized area of the City of Santa Ana. Although the proposed Project would result in modifications to the visual character of the area resulting from the widening of Bristol Street and resultant property acquisitions, as well as the addition of an 8 -foot high block wall at approximately the same location where the soundwall was previously addressed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR, the Project would not result in substantial changes in visual character as analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR. Implementation of mitigation measures as included in the previously approved 1990 FEIS /EIR, including installation of a block wall as described above, would ensure that impacts are reduced to a less than significant level.

Although the proposed block wall is no longer warranted for purposes of noise abatement based on the updated Project noise analysis ( RBF Consulting, 2014), the wall, as further described in the 1990 FEIS /EIR, was taken into consideration as a Project - related component in the context of providing improved visual continuity within the Bristol Street corridor; not constructing the proposed block wall would detract from providing an aesthetically unified streetscape along the Project corridor.

Mitigation Measures
No additional new mitigation measures are required.
d.) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Light and glare are currently generated from various sources within the Project area ( e.g., commercial and retail businesses, signage, street lighting, and parking lot lighting). The proposed Project does not involve the construction of any structures other than relocation of street lighting fixtures. Therefore, no new sources of light or glare are anticipated with implementation of the proposed Project. The proposed Project would not generate additional daytime or nighttime illumination beyond that currently experienced within the area. Implementation of the proposed Project would not create more significant light and glare impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 27 City Council 16 – 70 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Mitigation Measures
No additional new mitigation measures are required.

3. 2 Agricultural Resources
The previously approved 1990 FEIS/EIR did not include evaluation for agricultural resources, as no agricultural resources are located within the area of analysis. a.) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland ofStatewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the mapsprepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use? The Project site is located within a highly urbanized area of the City of Santa Ana. No Prune, Unique, or Farmland of Statewide Importance is located in the vicinity of the Project site. No impacts would result from the proposed Project. The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No additional new mitigation measures are required.
b.) Conflict with existing zoningfor agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? The Project site is located within a highly urbanized area in the City of Santa Ana. Lands within the Project area are designated General Commercial as identified in the City of Santa Ana' s General Plan.

The zoning designation of properties within the Project area is Specific Plan ( SPI) which allows for a variety of land uses such as commercial, office, residential and open space as provided in the approved Specific Plan document. No agricultural uses exist on site or in the vicinity, and the Project would not conflict with a Williamson Act contract as none exist in the Project area. The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No additional new mitigation measures are required.
c.) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning, of forest land ( as defined in Public Resources Code section 122200), timberland ( as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production ( as defined by Government Code section 511040)?
The Project site is located within a highly urbanized area in the City of Santa Ana. Lands within the Project area are designated General Commercial as identified in the City of Santa Ana' s General Plan.

The zoning designation of properties within the Project area is Specific Plan ( SPI) which allows for a variety of land uses such as commercial, office, residential and open space as provided in the approved Specific. Plan document. No agricultural uses exist on site or in the vicinity, and the Project would not conflict with a Williamson Act contract as none exist in the Project area. The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No additional new mitigation measures are required.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YO PAGE 28 City Council 16 – 71 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue d.) Result in the loss offorest land or conversion offorest land to nonforest use? The Project site is located within a highly urbanized area in the City of Santa Ana. No forest land is located on site or in the vicinity. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No additional new mitigation measures are required.
e.) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use or conversion offorest land to nonforest use? The Project site is located within a highly urbanized area in the City of Santa Ana. No forest land is located on site or in the vicinity. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed, regarding farmland, in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No additional new mitigation measures are required.

3. 3 Air Quality
This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsections FI - Air Quality and V - Construction hnpacts of the previously approved 1990 FEIS /EIR. a.) Conflict with or obstruct implementation ofthe applicable air quality plan? The Bristol Street Widening Project is fully funded and included in SCAG' s 2012 Regional Transportation Plan titled 2012 -2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy RTP /SCS): Towards a Sustainable Future ( 2012 RTP) ( RTP ID ORA125). The project is also currently listed in SCAG' s financially constrained 2013 Federal Transportation Improvement Program ( 2013 FTIP) for fiscal year 2012/ 2013 — 2015/ 2016. The project entry in the 2013 FTIP identifies the following scope of work: BRISTOL ST ( WARNER TO MEMORY LANE) WIDEN FROM 4 TO 6 LANES ( IMPV AT BRISTOLlWARNER (ADD NB/EB /SB THRU LNS; WB RT TRN LN) AND BRISTOL /FIRST (ADD NB /SB THRU LNS; SB LFT /RT /TRN LNS).

The Project' s design concept and scope have not changed significantly from what was analyzed in the RTIP and FTIP. This analysis found that the plan and, therefore the individual projects contained in the plan, are conforming projects and would have air quality impacts consistent with those identified in the SIPS for achieving the NAAQS. The FFIWA determined the RTIP to conform to the SIP.

The proposed widening of Bristol Street, from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane has been included in the FTIP since 1992. The FTIP gives priority to eligible Transportation Control Measures ( TCMs) identified in the SIP and provides sufficient funds to provide for their implementation. The FHWA determined the FTIP to conform to the SIP on April 2, 2009. No significant impacts would occur. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Furthermore, the South Coast Air Basin ( SCAB) is designated by the state and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as nonattainment for ozone (03), and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2,5). The South Coast Air Quality Management District ( SCAQMD) developed regional emissions thresholds to ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU City Council 16 – 72 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue determine whether or not a project would contribute to air pollutant violations. If a project exceeds the regional air pollutant thresholds, then the project would substantially contribute to air quality violations in the SCAB. In addition, a project would also contribute to air pollutant violations if localized emissions result in an exceedance of the ambient air quality standards ( AAQS).

Based on the Air Quality Assessment Report performed by URS Corporation ( 2013a) for the Project, short -tern emissions generated during Project - related construction activities would not exceed the SCAQMD regional emissions thresholds for any of the criteria pollutants and also would not substantially elevate localized concentrations of these pollutants. Consequently, the Project would be consistent with the Air Quality Management Plant ( AQMP). Long -tern emissions generated by the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for regional emissions and would therefore also not contribute to an increase in frequency or severity of air quality violations.

The proposed Project would be consistent with the Major Arterial designation of the City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element and the County of Orange' s Master Plan of Arterial Highways.

Additionally, the Project would improve traffic flow and result in a reduction in air pollutant emissions.

Mitigation Measures
No additional new mitigation measures are required.
b.) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation?
Short- tern emissions were modeled for the construction phase of the proposed Project. Construction activities associated with the Project would include demolition of pavement and buildings, fine grading, trenching, paving, and development of ancillary structures. During construction activities, emissions from heavy equipment exhaust, delivery trucks, and fugitive dust would be generated for a short duration. To accurately determine the significance of air quality impacts from construction activities, construction emissions are quantified and compared to the significance thresholds set by the SCAQMD. Project - specific data, such as construction timelines and dimensions of the Project site, along with general operating guidelines, were used as inputs to the SCAQMD' s California Emissions Estimator Model CalEEMOd) ( version 2011. 1. 1) to quantify construction emissions. As shown in Table 2, emissions calculated by this model were compared to the SCAQMD' s regional significance thresholds to determine whether project emissions would result in a significant air quality impact.

As shown in Table 2, emissions attributable to construction of the proposed Project were found to be below the significance thresholds adopted by the SCAQMD for all the analyzed air pollutants. Because emissions were found to be below the SCAQMD' s significance thresholds, Project related constriction emissions are not considered by the SCAQMD to result in a significant air quality impact. In addition, mitigation measures included in the 1990 FEIS /EIR would further reduce construction - related air quality impacts.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (0 [/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 30 City Council 16 – 73 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue TABLE 2 PROJECT RELATED CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS
Demolition
VOC NOx CO S02 PMI0 PM2.5
70 44 < 1 12 3
Trenching 5 41 19 < 1 2 2
Grading 8 60 34 < 1 6 4
Paving 3 16 11 < 1 2 1
Maximum 9 70 44 < 1 12 4
SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No
Source: Air Quality Assessment Report ( URS 2013a),
Notes: VOC = volatile organic compounds; NOx = nitrogen oxides; CO = carbon monoxide; S02 = sulfur dioxide; PMlo = particulate matter less than less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter; PM25 = particulate matter less than less than or equal to 2. 5 microns In diameter An assessment of regional emissions associated with the operations phase of the proposed Project was also conducted which compared emissions with and without the proposed Project. Air pollutant emissions generated by roadway vehicles are quantified based on emissions rates that vary based on vehicle speed.

Because the proposed Project would increase the roadway capacity along Bristol Street, traffic congestion would be alleviated and average vehicle speeds would increase along improved roadway segments. Table 3 shows the emissions that would occur with and without the proposed Project based on the average vehicle speeds. As shown in Table 3, air pollutant emissions would be less under the With- Project Alternative as opposed to the No Project Alternative due to the lower emission rates associated with higher average vehicle speeds. The SCAQMD has established significance thresholds to determine whether the operations phase of projects would result in significant impacts to regional air quality. The proposed Project would result in air pollutant emissions which are below these significance thresholds and would result in a beneficial impact on air pollutant emissions due to improvements in operational phase efficiencies along Project roadway segments for the 2015 Project opening year.

Emissions occurring during the 2035 design year were also quantified based on the LOS, average vehicle speed and emission rates that would occur with and without the proposed Project. As shown in Table 4, air pollutant emissions occurring under the With- Project Alternative would be less than under the No Project Alternative due to lower emission rates associated with higher average speeds. Consequently, the Proposed Project for the 2035 Project design year would likewise result in emissions which are below the SCAQMD' s significance thresholds and would result in a beneficial impact relative to greenhouse gas GHG) emissions due to improvements in operational phase efficiencies along Project roadway segments.

Mitigation Measures
No additional new mitigation measures are required.

TABLE 3 YEAR 2015 WITH AND WITHOUT PROJECT AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS

ROADWAY -

AVERAGE

INTERSECTION
VEHICLE CO ROG NOX SOz PM10 I' l
SPEED
Year 2015 No Protect
Civic Center Drive and
Washington Avenue
Bristol Street
13 69 12
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 31 City Council 16 – 74 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Civic Center Drive and - 24 - 3 - 4 0 - 1 - 1
Washington Avenue
SCAQMD Significance
Thresholds 550 55 55 150 150 55
Exceeds Thresholds
Notes: mph = miles per hour; CO = carbon monoxide; ROG = reactive organic gases; NOx = nitrogen oxides; S02 = sulfur dioxide; PMIo = particulate matter less than less than or equal to 10 microns In diameter; PM2,5 = particulate matter less than less than or equal to 2. 5 microns in diameter,
TABLE 4 YEAR 2035 WITH AND WITHOUT PROJECT AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS Year 2035 No Protect
Bristol Street Between Civic
Center Drive and 13 35 3 6 0 2 2
Washington Avenue
Year 2035 with Project
Bristol Street Between Civic
Center Drive and 20 29 2 4 0 2 1
Washinaton Avenue
Difference between No Proiect and with Proiect Emissions Bristol Street Between Civic
Center Drive and - 6 - 1 - 1 0 - 1 - 1 - 6
Washington Avenue
SCAQMDISignificance
550 55 55 150 150 55
Exceeds Thresholds No No No No No No
Source: Air Quality Assessment Report ( URS 2013a).

Notes: mph = miles per hour; CO = carbon monoxide; ROG = reactive organic gases; NOx = nitrogen oxides; S02 = sulfur dioxide; PMio = particulate matter less than less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter; PM2,5= particulate matter less than less than or equal to 2, 5 microns in diameter.
c.) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutantfor which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholdsfor ozoneprecursors) ? The SCAB is designated by the EPA and the State as being nonattainment for 03, PM10, and PM2,5. In accordance with SCAQMD methodology, any project that does not exceed or can be mitigated to less than the daily threshold values does not add significantly to a cumulative impact. As mentioned above, the development of the proposed Project demonstrates that construction and operational activities would not result in emissions in excess of SCAQMD' s threshold values. Since the proposed Project would not exceed the SCAQMD' s significance thresholds for construction activities or the operations phase, the SCAQMD does not consider emissions from the Project' s emissions to add significantly to any cumulative impact. Furthermore, it should be noted that the proposed Project would increase the capacity ANA 305 -011 ( PER O2) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 32 City Council 16 – 75 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue of Bristol Street from Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue to address existing and projected traffic congestion. Increases in roadway capacity would result in improvement in the LOS along Bristol Street.

The improvement in LOS would result in increases in average vehicle speed and reductions in the amount of delay vehicles experience at intersections thereby resulting in both lower emissions and lower emissions rates associated with higher vehicle speeds. As such, the Project would continue to result in a beneficial impact. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No additional new mitigation measures are required.
d.) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? A project could have the potential to expose sensitive receptors to elevated pollutant concentrations if it would cause or contribute substantially to elevated pollutant concentration levels or place the Project in an area with elevated pollutant concentrations. An evaluation of air pollutant emissions as it affects local sensitive receptors has been conducted for both the construction and operations phases of the Project.

Localized Construction Impacts
Localized air pollutant emissions are evaluated relative to the exposure of local sensitive uses to air pollutant concentrations generated by the proposed Project. These are pollutant concentrations which can be directly correlated to the health -based ambient air quality standards. This differs from regional emissions which were discussed previously in that regional emissions are used to assess how much air pollution is generated within an air basin and does not have a direct correlation with health effects.

Localized Significance Thresholds ( LSTs) have been developed by the SCAQMD for nitrogen oxides NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), PMIo, and PM2.5• The LSTs determine whether project - related emissions would substantially contribute to or exceed the ambient air quality standards and expose sensitive receptors to excessive concentrations of air pollutants. The LSTs differ based on distance such that a greater allowance in air pollutant emissions is allowed for construction activities occurring further from a sensitive use and a lesser allowance in emissions is given for construction activities occurring closer to sensitive uses.

Only short -term emissions occurring at the Project site for the Project' s construction phase were included to determine if sensitive receptors local to the Project site would be adversely affected. Emissions generated by construction activities disperse rapidly with distance from the construction site. Individual construction phases were compared against the SCAQMD' s LST significance criteria. As shown in Table 5, Project emissions would not exceed the EST screening level criteria for CO, nitrogen dioxide ( NO2), PMIO, or PM2.5. Because emissions associated with this alternative would be less than the LST, onsite construction emissions would not be expected to exceed the federal or California AAQS at the nearest sensitive receptors. As such, no significant air quality impacts related to localized air pollutants would occur from the construction phase.

TABLE 5 LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS ANALYSIS FOR CONSTRUCTION

ACTIVITIES

TRUCTION PHASE
Demolition
NOx
66 41
60 34
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU CO PMI0 PM2.s
City Council 16 – 76 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue x
iCRITEjA i p_L1 UiSl! BIfA
l A & R31 ` PMN'THAbE
NOx CO PM10 PMes
Trenching 41 19 2 2
Paving 16 11 1 1
SCAQMD Threshold 183 1253 13 7
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No
Source: Air Quality Assessment Report (URS 2013a),
Notes: NOx = nitrogen oxides; CO = carbon monoxide; PMro = particulate matter less than less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter; PM2.5 = particulate matter less than less than or equal to 2. 5 microns in diameter.

Intersection Hot -Spots
While the proposed Project would not result in any direct sources of localized emissions due to the roadway street lighting being powered by electricity, changes in LOS or traffic volumes due to the Project may cause indirect sources of localized emissions. While emissions of motor vehicles have improved due to more stringent vehicle emissions standards and the use of cleaner burning fuels, they continue to be the primary source of local emissions within the study area. Localized areas where ambient concentrations exceed national and/or state standards for CO are known as hotspots. The SCAQMD defines typical sensitive receptors as residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, athletic facilities, long -term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, and retirement homes.

Because CO is produced in greatest quantities from vehicle combustion and does not readily disperse into the atmosphere, adherence to AAQS is typically demonstrated through an analysis of localized CO concentrations. Areas of vehicle congestion have the potential to create pockets of CO called " hot spots." These pockets have the potential to exceed the state one -hour standard of 20 parts per million (ppm) or the eight -hour standard of 9 ppm. Note that the federal levels are based on one- and eight -hour standards of 35 and 9 ppm, respectively. Thus, an exceedance condition would occur based on the state standards before the federal standards.

The following intersections were modeled for CO hotspots as detailed in the Air Quality Assessment Report (URS 2013a):

Bristol Street and 17"' Street
Bristol Street and Washington Avenue
As shown in Table 6, both the 1- and 8 -hour CO concentrations at the intersections that were affected by the proposed Project would be substantially below the California and federal AAQS for CO. Potential CO impacts related to the Project alternatives are below AAQS and would not result in a significant air quality impact from CO hotspots.

TABLE 6 CO HOTSPOT ANALYSIS ( PPM)

CONCENTRATION
CAAQS CONCENTRATION CAAQS 1 - Hour 8 -Hour
Bristol Street and Civic Center Drive
Bristol Street and Washington Avenue
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 34 City Council 16 – 77 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue 20 4. 5
20 4. 5
20 4. 5
Source: Air Quality Assessment Report( URS 2013a),
Note: CAAQS = California Ambient Air Quality Standards. 1 - Hour 8 -Hour
As discussed previously, the proposed Project would not result in air pollutant concentrations that exceed the SCAQMD' s LSTs for construction activities. In addition, the operations phase of the Project would not result in CO hotspots. As such, the construction and operations phases of the Project would not result in significant impacts to air quality which would expose sensitive receptors to substantial air pollutant concentrations.

Mitigation Measures
No additional new mitigation measures are required.
e.) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of'people? Construction activities associated with the proposed Project may generate detectable odors from heavy - duty construction equipment and exhaust. Odors associated with diesel and gasoline fumes are transitory in nature and would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. The impacts from these odors would be short -term, would cease upon Project completion, and are not anticipated to be significant. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No additional new mitigation measures are required.

3.4 Biological Resources
This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsection E - Streambed Modification, of the previously approved 1990 FEIS /EIR. a.) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special- status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department ofFish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? The Project site is located within a highly urbanized area within the City of Santa Ana. No sensitive natural habitat or special- status species exist on or in the vicinity of the proposed Project ( Natural Environment Study [ Minimal Impacts], URS Corporation, April 2011). Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
b.) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE City Council 16 – 78 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Refer to response in 3. 4 ( a.), above. No riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities are identified in the Project area or vicinity. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
c.) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 ofthe Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Refer to response in 3. 4 ( a.), above. No federally protected wetlands are identified in the Project area or vicinity. The proposed Project is located within a highly urbanized area of the City of Santa Ana.

Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
d.) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
The proposed Project is located within a highly urbanized area of the City of Santa Ana. The Project would not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites, as none are located within the Project area.

Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
e.) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
The proposed Project may result in the removal of existing landscaping, including trees. As such, removal or planting of trees is required to comply with the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code, Chapter 33, Article VII, Regulation of the Planting, Maintenance, and Removal of Trees. Furthermore, the proposed Project would not conflict with the City' s tree ordinance. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 36 City Council 16 – 79 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue The Project site is not located within a habitat conservation plan. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 5 Cultural Resources
This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsection T - Cultural Resources, of the previously approved 1990 FEIS /EIR. a.) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in 15064.5?
A Historic Property Survey Report (Applied Earthworks, 2015) was prepared for the Project to document identification, recordation, and evaluation efforts for architectural resources, such as buildings, structures, objects, districts, and linear features within the Project area. The Historic Property Survey Report concludes with the finding that none of the properties within the Area of Potential Effect (APE) appear to meet the criterion for listing in the National Register of Historic Places or California Register of Historical Resources ( CRHR). The historic - period properties within the APE also have been evaluated in accordance with Section 15064. 5( a)( 2) -( 3) of the CEQA Guidelines, using the criteria outlined in Section 5024. 1 of the California Public Resources Code (CPRC), and do not appear to be historical resources for purposes of CEQA. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
b.) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ofan archaeological resource pursuant to 15064.5?
Due to the limited area of disturbance, within an existing developed and urban area, and limited depth of proposed excavations, the potential to uncover archaeological resources is considered low. However, implementation of mitigation measures as included in the previously approved 1990 FEIS/EIR would reduce impacts to archaeological resources yet uncovered or undiscovered. The proposed Project would not result in archaeological impacts greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
c.) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
As documented in Chapter VI, Resources Element, of the County of Orange General Plan, the Project site is not located in an area of paleontological sensitivity. Also, the proposed Project would involve only shallow excavation. Furthermore, since the Project area is already developed, the potential for discovering paleontological resources during construction is low. Soils occurring in the Project area are mostly Quaternary Alluvium. Typically, these deposits are less than 10,000 years old, and not likely to contain 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 37 City Council 16 – 80 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue important fossils. No greater impacts to paleontological resources than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR would result from Project implementation.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
tb) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside offormal cemeteries? The Project site is located within a highly urbanized area within the City of Santa Ana. No formal cemeteries are located within the Project area or vicinity. However, in the event that human remains are uncovered during grading or excavation, contractors are required to comply with the procedures and requirements set forth in the California Health and Safety Code Section 7050. 5 and CPRC Section 2098. 98. The County Coroner and, in the event that the remains are Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission would be notified and, in turn, would notify those persons believed to be most likely descended from the deceased for appropriate disposition of the remains. The proposed Project would not result in an impact to human remains greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 6 Geology and Soils
This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsections A - Landform Modification, B - Seismic Hazards, C - Erosion Impacts, and F - Water Quality, of the previously approved 1990 FEIS/EIR.
a.) i Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.

The City of Santa Ana is not included in the Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map. The Project site is not underlain by an active fault and the closest fault, the Newport- Inglewood Fault, is approximately eight miles to the west. The proposed widening would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/FIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
a.)ii Strong seismic ground shaking?
The Newport- Inglewood Fault is the closest fault to the Project site and is the most likely source of ground shaking impacts. The proposed Project is an intersection widening project and would not expose people or structures to adverse ground shaking impact. The proposed widening would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 38 City Council 16 – 81 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue a.)iii Seismic- relatedgroundfallure, including liquefaction? The Project site is not identified by the 1990 FEIS /EIR as having a high liquefaction potential but is near areas classified as having high to medium liquefaction potential. In addition, the Project would be constructed to achieve the standards outlined in the California Building Code to reduce impacts in this regard. Consequently, the proposed Project would not expose people or structures to potential liquefaction impact. The proposed widening would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
a.) iv Landslides?
The proposed Project site is generally flat and does not contain any significant slopes. The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
b.) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss oftopsoil? Exposure of barren rock and soil surfaces during construction would result in soil erosion. However, considering the slight gradient, anticipated erosion impact is minimal. Furthermore, the Project would be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting regulation, including the development and implementation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) during construction activities. The SWPPP requires construction contractors to implement best management practices ( BMPs) to reduce sediment from impacting the storm water system. The increased erosion impact due to the intersection widening would not be substantially greater than previously analyzed. c.) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
The 1990 FEIS /EIR indicated that there are no instances of undisturbed, natural soils. The Project site is underlain by well - drained alluvial fan or flood plains and is not included in the areas of high subsidence or high liquefaction hazard ( but located south of an area identified as having high to medium subsidence for liquefaction). The Project area is fully developed with urban uses within the City of Santa Ana. The proposed Project would be constructed in accordance with the standards of the Uniform Building Code UBC). The proposed Project would not create greater impact than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
d.) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code ( 1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?
ANA 305- 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YO PAGE 39 City Council 16 – 82 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue The proposed Project would not include the construction of any structures other than relocation of existing utilities. The proposed Project would not create substantial risks to life or property and the proposed Project would not create greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
e.) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ofseptic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal ofwaste water? The proposed Project would not generate any sewage or wastewater and would not require installation of any septic tanks or alternative wastewater systems. No impacts are anticipated in this regard.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsections H - Air Quality, and V - Construction Impacts of the 1990 FEIS/EIR. a.) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
Greenhouse gas emissions ( GHG) were not evaluated in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. Construction activities would consume fuel and result in the generation of GHG emissions. Construction of the Project is anticipated to occur over a one -year period. Construction - related GHG emissions would cease upon completion of the Project. Due to the length of construction activities, GHG emissions associated with construction activities are anticipated to be minimal. Because construction emissions are not substantial and would cease after completion of construction, GHG emissions would not be significant.

Furthermore, the Project proposes intersection widening of Bristol Street at 1701 Street and Washington Avenue, therefore only carbon dioxide ( CO2) emissions from mobile - sources are evaluated. Similar to the other criteria pollutants, the highest emissions would occur between 0 to 10 miles per hour (mph) and 50 mph and above. Because the Project would improve traffic flow within the Project area, the Project would result in reduced CO2 emissions. Consequently, GHG emissions associated with the Project would be less than significant.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are required.
b.) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions ofgreenhouse gases?
The proposed Project would not conflict with applicable plans, policy, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHG. The proposed Project would result in improved traffic flow, reduced vehicle idling times, and congestion. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in new impacts to GHG.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SAN"I' A ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 40 City Council 16 – 83 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are required.

3. 8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsections V - Construction Impacts, X - Hazardous Materials, of the 1990 Final EIS /EIR. a.) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal ofhazardous materials?
The proposed Project would involve demolition of existing structures. Compliance with the standard protocol surveys and abating procedures would be required prior to any demolition activities that would potentially disturb existing building materials. Furthermore, specific requirements limiting asbestos emissions from building demolition activities are set forth in SCAQMD Rule 1403 ( Asbestos Emission from Demolition/ Renovation Activities). The existing structures to be demolished and roadway pavement striping are also required to be surveyed for lead -based paint prior to removal, in compliance with the applicable local, state, and federal regulations administered through the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health. Compliance with existing regulations would ensure that impacts are not greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation measures are required.
b.) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release ofhazardous materials into the environment? Refer to response in 3. 8 ( a.), above. Compliance with existing regulations and mitigation measures from the 1990 FEIS/EIR would ensure that impacts are not greater than previously analyzed.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

C.) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile ofan existing orproposed school? As listed below in Table 7, there are four schools located within approximately one - quarter mile of the Project site.

TABLE 7 SCHOOLS WITHIN THE PHASE IIIA PROJECT AREA
SCHOOL NAME ADDRESS, DISTANCE. LOCATION
Gonzalo Felicitas Mendez Fundamental 2000 North Bristol Street 0. 17 mile Northwest of Bristol Street at 17t" Intermediate School Santa Ana, CA 92706 Street intersection Love 2 Learn Preschool & K 1200 West 17th Street 0. 10 mile East of Bristol Street at 17th Street Santa Ana, CA 92706 intersection
Woodrow Wilson Elementary School 1317 North Baker Street 0. 16 mile Northeast of Bristol Street at Santa Ana CA 92706 Washington Avenue intersection
Heroes Elementary School 1111 W Civic Center Drive 0. 25 miles East of Bristol Street at Civic Santa Ana, CA 92703 Center Drive intersection
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/2015) YU PAGE 41 City Council 16 – 84 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue George Washington Carver 1401 W Santa Ana Boulevard 0. 25 miles Southwest of Bristol Street at Civic Elementary School Santa Ana, CA 92703 Center Drive intersection Santa Ana College 1530 West 17th Street 0. 20 mile West of Bristol Street between Santa Ana, CA 92706 Washington Avenue and 17th Street
Refer to response in 3. 8 ( a.), above. Health risks associated with Project construction- related activities would be less than significant. Compliance with existing regulations would ensure that impacts are not greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
d.) Be located on a site which is included on a list ofhazardous materials sites compiledpursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
The Project area is developed with residential, institutional, open space, commercial and retail uses.

Pursuant to the Phase I Initial Site Assessment Update prepared by RBF Consulting ( 2015), the Project site includes a former service station location where gasoline was reported to have contaminated the groundwater; the site was under -going site remediation through appropriate state and local agency standards as required. To that end, the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board issued a case closure letter dated September 3, 2014 stating that no further action was required for the site. Compliance with existing regulations and mitigation measures from the 1990 FEIS/EIR would ensure that impacts are not greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
e.) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazardforpeople residing or working in the project area? The Project site is not within an airport land use plan. The closest airport to the site is John Wayne — Orange County Airport, more than five miles southeast of the Project site. The proposed widening would not introduce any new risks or increase risks associated with the Project.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
f.) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
The Project site is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip and would not create any safety hazard. The proposed Project would not create additional significant impact.

ANA 305 -01 t ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 42 City Council 16 – 85 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
g.) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
During construction, the disruption of traffic and access along Bristol Street between Civic Center Drive and Washington Avenue would temporarily affect the mobility of emergency vehicles. However, provisions would be made for interim access through the Project corridor and to adjoining properties; traffic control plans would be prepared detailing provisions for vehicular movement and access through the Project corridor during construction. Advance warning and information signs would be used to inform motorists during the construction process. It is expected that two -way travel would be maintained along Bristol Street during construction. Although the proposed Project may interfere with an emergency evacuation plan, it would be short term during construction and mobility would improve once the Project is completed. Compliance with mitigation measures from the 1990 FEIS /EIR would ensure that impacts are not greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
h.) Expose people or structures to a significant risk ofloss, injury or death involving wildlandfires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
The proposed Project is located in a highly urbanized area of the City of Santa Ana. There are no wildlands in the Project vicinity and no new significant impacts would result with Project implementation.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 9 Hydrology and Water Quality
This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsections C - Erosion Impacts, D - Floodplain /Floodway Encroachment, and F - Water Quality of the 1990 FEIS /EIR.
a.) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (CWA), the EPA has established regulations under the NPDES program to control direct storm water discharges. The proposed Project would be required to comply with the NPDES program for the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Construction Activities
Grading and excavation and use of hazardous materials during Project - related construction activities would create potential sources of polluted discharge. The construction contractor is required to conforin to the requirements of the General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity. Pursuant to the CWA, in 2009 the State Water Quality Control Board issued a statewide General Construction Permit for stonnwater discharges from construction sites ( NPDES No. CAS000002; Order ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 43 City Council 16 – 86 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue No. 2009 - 2009 -DWQ, amended as Order No. 2012 - 0006 -DWQ). Under this General Construction Permit, discharges of stormwater from construction sites with a disturbed area of one or more acres are required to either obtain individual NPDES permits for stormwater discharges or to be covered by the General Construction Permit. In addition, BMPs specified in the Caltrans Storm Water Management Plan are also applicable. The construction contractor is required to conform to the requirements of the General NPDES Permit for Construction Activities and any subsequent General Permit in effect at the time of Project construction.

As part of the statewide NPDES permit, the construction contractor would be required to implement BMPs into their construction operations to reduce potential water quality impacts to the maximum extent practicable through preparation of a SWPPP. The General Construction Permit contains requirements that BMPs must meet, including:

Erosion Control
Erosion control, also called stabilization, is the protection of the soil surface so that soil particles do not become detached by water or wind; and trapping soil particles that do become detached and are moved by water or wind.

Non - Stormwater Management
Non - stormwater management is the reduction or avoidance of discharges other than stormwater, such as from cleaning of vehicles and equipment, and spills of hazardous materials and hazardous wastes. Non - stormwater management includes requirements for the use and storage of hazardous substances so as to avoid spills and minimizes pollution by cleaning spills that do occur.

The SWPPP contains BMPs chosen for a project based on the specific activities that would be conducted as part of that project, and the amounts of stormwater and non- stormwater runoff that are anticipated, and the projected Risk Level. The 1990 FEIS /EIR included a mitigation measure to control stormwater runoff associated with construction activities. Impacts would be less than significant and would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. Moreover, the Project would comply with the updated NPDES requirements, as described above.

Operational Phase
Vehicular travel along the improved Project corridor has the potential to degrade water quality, including increases in such pollutants as oil, gasoline, grease, lead, and dust. Discharge from the Project site to stormwater facilities would consist of non -point sources. Stormwater quality is generally affected by the length of time since the last rainfall, rainfall intensity, urban uses of the area, and the quantity of transported sediments. Typical urban water quality pollutants usually result from motor vehicle operations, oil and grease residue. The majority of pollutant loads are usually washed away during the first flush of the storm occurring after the dry season period. Due to the nature of the proposed Project, occurring within an existing developed area, Project impacts are not considered adverse. Therefore, impacts to water quality would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
b.) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of'the local groundwater table level ( e.g., the production rate ofpre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses orplanned uses for which permits have been granted)? ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) Cr1'Y OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 44 City Council 16 – 87 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue The proposed widening of Bristol Street, as addressed herein, would not result in increased water consumption and would not deplete groundwater supplies. No impact to groundwater supplies would result from the proposed Project. No mitigation measures are necessary. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
c.) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration ofthe course ofa stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site?
The proposed Project would not alter the existing drainage pattern in the area. Storm drain improvements would include the relocation and /or construction of catch basins and lateral drainage lines as necessary.

Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite due to drainage alteration. No mitigation measures are necessary. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
d.) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoffin a manner that would result in flooding on- or off -site? Refer to response in 3. 9 ( c), above. The proposed Project would not result in a substantial increase in impervious ground surfaces, and therefore would not increase the rate or amount of surface runoff so as to create on- or off -site flooding. Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
e.) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity ofexisting or planned storm water drainage systems orprovide substantial additional sources ofpolluted runoff? Refer to response in 3. 9 ( c), above. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
f.) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
Refer to response in 3. 9 ( c.), above. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

ANA 305 -0I1 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 45 City Council 16 – 88 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue g.) Place housing within a 100year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or otherflood hazard delineation map? The proposed widening would not place any housing within a 100 -year flooding zone as mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency; therefore, no impact would result from the proposed Project in that regard. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
h.) Place within a 100year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows?
Refer to response in 3. 9 ( g), above. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
i.) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, includingflooding as a result ofthe failure of a levee or dam? The proposed Project does not involve the development or placement of any structures, with exception of relocation of utility poles. Therefore, the Project would not expose people or structures to a significant flooding risk beyond that which already exists. No impact would result from the proposed Project.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
j.) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
The Project site is located approximately 10 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean; therefore, the likelihood of tsunami impacting the site is minimal. The Project site and vicinity are highly urbanized and there is no unusual slope or geologic features in the area. The potential for seiche, tsunami, or mudflow impacting the Project site is less than significant. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measure
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 10 Land Use and Planning
This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsection A - Landform Modification, of the 1990 FEIS /EIR. a.) Physically divide an established community?
The proposed Project involves the widening of Bristol Street between Civic Center Drive and Washington Avenue; the proposed widening would not divide an established community. Although the proposed widening of Bristol Street within the Project limits would result in full acquisition of existing properties, ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 46 City Council 16 – 89 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase II/A— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue the Project would not create a physical barrier to, or separate a community. The proposed Project would not introduce any significant land use impacts than previously analyzed. No significant impact would result from the Project implementation. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
b.) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project ( including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
According to the City of Santa Ana' s General Plan, the Project area is designated General Commercial GC). The zoning designation of properties within the Project area is Specific Plan ( SP I) which allows for a variety of land uses such as commercial, office, residential and open space as provided in the approved Specific Plan document. The proposed Project would not result in changes to the land use designation of the acquired parcels. The proposed Project is in compliance with the existing designation and would not create a new conflict. No significant impact is anticipated. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
c.) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? The Project site is not a part of any habitat conservation plan, and is located within a highly urbanized area within the City of Santa Ana. The proposed widening would not conflict with any habitat conservation plan or natural community. No impact is anticipated. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEISBIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 11 Mineral Resources
This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsection W - Consumption of Renewable and Non - Renewable Resources of the 1990 FEISBIR. a.) Result in the loss ofavailability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents ofthe state?
The Project site is currently developed and does not contain any areas that are utilized for the extraction of mineral resources. Furthermore, the proposed Project would not involve excavation that would likely identify previously unidentified mineral resources. No impact to mineral resources would result from the proposed Project. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YO PAGE 47 City Council 16 – 90 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue b.) Result in the loss ofavailability of a locally - important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? The Project site is currently developed and is not delineated as a mineral resources recovery site by the City of Santa Ana General Plan. Implementation of the proposed Project would have no impact on the mineral resources and no mitigation measures are necessary. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 12 Noise
This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsections I - Noise, and V - Construction Impacts of the 1990 FEIS/EIR. a.) Exposure ofpersons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local generalplan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards ofother agencies? The proposed Project involves widening of Bristol Street between Civic Center Drive and Washington Avenue in an area that consists primarily of residential and commercial uses ( Category C) along Bristol Street within the Project limits. As detailed in the Supplemental Technical Noise Study Memorandum prepared by RBF Consulting ( 2014), noise abatement in the form of noise barriers, as originally presented in the 1990 FEIS /EIR, is not required for the Phase IIIA Project using current noise modeling methodology.

Mitigation Measures
No mitigation is required related to the operational ( with - widening) phase of the Project; noise abatement in the form of noise barriers ( sound walls) is no longer required based on the updated Project noise analysis.
b.) Exposure ofpersons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Refer to response in 3. 12 ( a.), above. During Project construction, noise associated with construction may intermittently dominate the noise environment in the immediate area of constriction. As described in the Noise Study Report prepared by URS Corporation ( 2012c), typical constriction equipment for roadway construction is expected to generate noise levels ranging from 74 to 89 decibels ( dB) at a distance of 50 feet. However, no additional adverse noise impacts from construction are anticipated as construction would comply with the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code, which limits construction noise to the least noise sensitive portions of the day. Construction equipment would be properly fitted and maintained according to the manufacturer' s specifications. Furthermore, construction noise would be short -term, temporary, and cease upon completion of the proposed Project. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FE1S /EIR with implementation of mitigation measures, as identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
305 -01 I ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YO PAGE 48 City Council 16 – 91 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue c.) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
Refer to response in 3. 12 ( a.) and (b), above.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
rl) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
Refer to response 3. 12 ( b.), above, for discussion regarding temporary noise impacts associated with Project construction.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
e.) For aproject located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The Project site is not located within an airport land use plan. The nearest airport is the John Wayne — Orange County Airport, located more than five miles from the proposed Project. No impacts would occur.

Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

J.) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
Refer to response 3. 12 ( e.), above. The proposed Project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 13 Population and Housing
This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsections L - Population, M - Housing Displacement, N - Business Displacement, O - Impacts on Neighborhood Character and Minority Groups, and R - Effect on Assessed Property Values, of the 1990 FEIS /EIR. No take of residential parcels is proposed as part of this Project. a.) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly ( for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 49 City Council 16 – 92 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue The proposed Project involves the widening of Bristol Street between Civic Center Drive and Washington Avenue, within a highly urbanized and built out area. The proposed Project is designed to accommodate the existing and future traffic volume and would not create significant numbers of new trips. The roadway segments and intersections within the Project area function at acceptable levels of service and, as such, are not expected to be significantly impacted to an unacceptable level of service by any additional traffic generated from the proposed Project. The proposed widening would not result in additional impact.

Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
b.) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction ofreplacement housing elsewhere?
A Relocation Impact Study Technical Memorandum was prepared by POWER Engineers, Inc. ( 2015) to identify potential impacts on residential and non - residential occupants as a result of the proposed Project.

The parcels identified for acquisition are defined as distinct locations where residential and nonresidential displacement could occur along the Project alignment. A total of 20 parcels ( see Table 1) would be fully acquired as a result of the proposed widening of Bristol Street between Civic Center Drive and Washington Avenue (refer to Figure 4 for the locations of affected properties). More specifically, the proposed Project, and its associated right -of -way requirements, would result in the full acquisition by the City of Santa Ana, of 17 single - family residential parcels; two parcels representing commercial /utility uses; and one parcel characterized as office -type use. Parcel 405- 262 -26 is within the project limits; however, this parcel is owned by the City. Based on the Relocation Impact Study Technical Memorandum (POWER Engineers, Inc. 2015), comparable relocation properties appear to be available in the metropolitan Santa Ana area in sufficient quantity, the need to provide replacement housing would not be triggered as a result of implementing the proposed Project. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

Project - related acquisitions would comply with policies pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as implemented by the City of Santa Ana.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
c.) Displace substantial numbers ofpeople, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Refer to response 3. 13 ( b.), above. Prior to displacement, residential and non - residential displacees would be presented with information regarding comparable replacement properties that are available within the last six months for rent, lease, or purchase regardless of race, color, religion, sex or national origin, and would be consistent with the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1968. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /E[R.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

ANA 305 -Ot I ( PER 02) CITY OP SANTA ANA (01/ 1912015) YU PAGE 50 City Council 16 – 93 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTREPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

3. 14 Public Services
This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsections P - Impacts on Community Facilities, and V - Construction Impacts of the 1990 FEIS /EIR. a.) Pire Protection?
The proposed Project includes the widening of the existing Bristol Street and no increase in demand for fire protection services would occur with implementation of the proposed Project. Furthermore, the proposed Project would result in positive impacts as a result of greater congestion relief and increased mobility in the vicinity for motor vehicles including emergency vehicles. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
b.) Police Protection?
Refer to response for Section 3. 14 ( a.), above. The proposed Project would reduce congestion and traffic idling times, and therefore, increase mobility of emergency vehicles, including police vehicles. The proposed Project would not result in the need or increase the demand for police services in the area.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
c.) Schools?
No schools would be impacted by the proposed Project and no school services would be affected by the proposed Project ( see response to Section 3. 8 ( c.), above, for information regarding schools in the vicinity of the Project). Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
d.) Parks?
There are no parks within the Project limits, and no park services would be increased or impacted as a result of the proposed Project. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
e.) Other publicfacilities?
The proposed Project entails the widening of Bristol Street between Civic Center Drive and Washington Avenue, and would not generate demands for public facilities. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 51 City Council 16 – 94 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA — Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 15 Recreation
This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsection P - Impact on Recreational Facilities, of the 1990 FEIS /EIR. a.) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
The proposed Project involves the widening of Bristol Street between Civic Center Drive and Washington Avenue within a highly urbanized and built -out area in the City of Santa Ana; the widening of Bristol Street would not induce growth, nor create demand for recreation - related services. Furthermore, the proposed Project would not result in the physical deterioration of recreational facilities. No mitigation measures are required with regards to recreational resources. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
b.) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreationalfacilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Refer to response 3. 15 ( a.), above. The proposed Project does not include, nor would it require, construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, no adverse physical impact on the environment would occur from such facilities as a result of the proposed Project. No mitigation measures are required. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 16 Transportation /Traffic
This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsections U - Impacts to Transportation Facilities, and V - Construction Impacts of the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

As stated in Section 1. 0, the proposed Project eliminates the dedicated eastbound right -tum lane and proposes a shared right -turn lane in its place at the intersection of Bristol Street and 17 °i Street. a.) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non - motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways andfreeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit.

The proposed Project is consistent with the applicable plans, ordinances and policies establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system as described in the 1990 FEIS /EIR. The widening of Bristol Street was designated in the Orange County Master Plan, and was ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19 /2015) YU PAGE 52 City Council 16 – 95 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue recommended in the Bristol Street Corridor Study — Final Report prepared by Motile, Grover & Associates ( 1983). It was also recommended in the Arterial Highway Element — Santa Ana Element — Santa Ana Transportation Corridor State II Alternative Analysis prepared by Parsons, Brinkerhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc. ( 1983). The proposed widening is also consistent with the recommendation found in the Intercity Liaison Committee — Five -Year Transportation Study Update to 1990 prepared by Basmaciyan- Darnell, Inc. ( 1985). Furthermore, the proposed Project would improve traffic operations through the Project corridor. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
b.) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency./or designated roads or highways? The proposed Project would result in an improvement to Bristol Street from Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue. Within the Project limits, Bristol Street would be widened from four to six lanes.

The proposed Project includes the addition of a westbound right -turn lane on Washington Avenue at Bristol Street, and also eliminates the eastbound through movement on Washington Avenue at Bristol Street to match existing conditions; elimination of this through movement along Washington Avenue would not result in a reduction in level of service as evaluated in the 1990 FEIS /EIR. The Project would result in improved traffic flow and LOS along the roadway; therefore, the proposed Project would not cause the County congestion agency' s LOS standards to be exceeded. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
c.) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? The closest airport to the site is John Wayne — Orange County Airport, located more than five miles southeast of the Project site; the proposed Project would have no impact on air traffic patterns. The proposed Project would not introduce any new risks or increase risks. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
d.) Substantially increase hazards dice to a design feature ( e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? The proposed Project would improve the traffic flow along Bristol Street from Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue, and would not create any sharp curves or other incompatible uses. The proposed Project would not create any significant hazards beyond what was previously analyzed. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 53 City Council 16 – 96 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase II/A— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
e.) Result in inadequate emergency access?
The proposed Project would improve traffic operations along Bristol Street in the long -term. During the construction phase traffic flow along Bristol Street within the Project limits could be temporarily affected, including the mobility of emergency vehicles; however, access, including two -way travel would be maintained through the Project corridor during construction. Traffic control plans would be prepared prior to construction to facilitate traffic movement through the Project corridor during construction. Although the proposed Project may interfere with emergency access in the short-term, it would improve emergency access once the Project is completed. The proposed Project would not result in impacts to emergency access beyond those previously identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
f.) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety ofsuch facilitles? The proposed Project would not conflict with any alternative transportation plan, and would increase safety associated with improvements to the traffic operations through the Project corridor. The proposed Project would not result in impacts greater than as described in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 17 Utilities and Service Systems
This section corresponds with Section IV - Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Measures, Subsections S - Effect on Utilities, and V - Construction Impacts of the 1990 Final EIS /EIR. a.) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
The proposed Project would not generate wastewater. No new significant impact is anticipated. No impacts are anticipated in this regard.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
b.) Require or result in the construction ofnew water or wastewater treatmentfacilities or expansion ofexistingfzellitles, the construction ofwhich could cause significant environmental effects? The proposed road widening Project would not require or result in the constriction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. The existing sewer and water lines beneath Bristol Street would not be relocated. No new significant impact is anticipated. Impacts in this regard would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 54 City Council 16 – 97 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
c.) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existingfacilities, the construction of'which could cause significant environmental effects? The proposed Project would not substantively affect runoff volumes in the area. Rather, the Project would improve existing drainage flow by constructing properly designed curb and gutter along the edges of Bristol Street. No new significant impact is anticipated. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
d.) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?
The proposed Project entails the widening of Bristol Street between Civic Center Drive and Washington Avenue; such improvements would not result in any increase in water demand /consumption. Landscape improvements, if applicable, would not require any new or expanded water entitlements. The proposed Project would not create any new significant environmental impact. hnpacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
e.) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project' s projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments?
Refer to response 3. 17 ( a.) and (b), above. The proposed roadway widening Project would not result in an increase in wastewater production. No new significant impact is anticipated. hnpacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS /EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
f.) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project' s solid waste disposal needs?
The proposed Project would generate construction waste on a short-term basis. Construction waste that cannot be recycled would be taken to available landfills. The predominant receiving landfill for the City is the Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill at 11002 Bee Canyon Access Road in Irvine. The landfill, which is owned and operated by the Orange County Integrated Waste Management Department, opened in 1990 and is scheduled to operate until approximately 2022. The facility has adequate landfill capacity to serve the proposed Project and no new significant environmental impact would result from the Project implementation. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 55 City Council 16 – 98 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.
g.) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? The proposed Project would comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. The Project would comply with the City of Santa Ana' s established reduction, reuse, and recycling programs. No new significant solid waste impact would result from the proposed Project. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Mitigation Measures
No new additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 18 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Based on this Addendum, the proposed Project has not substantially changed in regard to the setting, design, impacts, and mitigation measures as described in the 1990 FEIS /EIR. New circumstances or new information, including any new or revised environmental laws, regulations, or policies have not modified the impacts of the proposed Project.
a.) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat ofa fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples ofthe major periods of California history or prehistory?
The proposed Project would not result in impacts beyond those identified in the 1990 Final EIS/EIR in this regard, and does not have the potential to degrade the environment, reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, threaten plant or animal communities, reduce or restrict endangered plant or animal species or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory. b.) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects ofpast projects, the effects ofother current projects, and the effects ofprobable future proiects)?
Given the nature and scope of the proposed Project, and in consideration of mitigation measures that are included in the 1990 FEIS /EIR, the Project would not involve impacts that are cumulatively considerable. c.) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Construction - related activities are anticipated to have some relatively minor, temporary impacts which can be mitigated with implementation of measures included in the 1990 FEIS /EIR. Furthermore, potential long -term ( operational) impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels through implementation ofrequired mitigation measures.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/2015) YU PAGE 56 City Council 16 – 99 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA- Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue

4.0 REFERENCES
The following references were utilized for the preparation of this Addendum.

Applied Earthworks, Inc. 2015. Historic Property Survey Report - Bristol Street Widening Project (Phase III) Civic Center Drive to Seventeenth Street. January 2015.

Basmaciyan- Darnell, hic. 1985. Intercity Liaison Committee - Five -Year Transportation Study Update to 1990.

California Department of Transportation ( Caltrans). 2012. Noise Study Report - Bristol Street Widening Phase III Civic Center Drive to Seventeenth Street. March 2012.

Motile, Grover & Associates. 1983. Bristol Street Corridor Study - Final Report.

Parsons, Brinekerhoff, Quade, and Douglas, Inc. 1983. Arterial Highway Element - Santa Ana Element - Santa Ana Transportation Corridor State II Alternative Analysis.

POWER Engineers, Inc. 2015. Relocation Impact Statement Technical Memorandum - Bristol Street Widening Project (Phase III) Civic Center Drive to Seventeenth Street. January 2015.

RBF Consulting. 2014. Supplemental Technical Noise Study Memorandum - Bristol Street Widening Project (Phase III) Civic Center Drive to Seventeenth Street. August 2014. 2015. Phase I Initial Site Assessment Update - Bristol Street Widening Project (Phase III) Civic Center Drive to Seventeenth Street. January 2015.

Santa Ana, City of. 2010. City of Santa Ana General Plan. Adopted September 1982 ( with updates and reformatting through January 2010).
2013. City of Santa Ana Website: www.ci.santa- ana.ca.us. Accessed November 2013. 2013b. 17' St. at Bristol St. EB Right Turn Pocket Future LOS Calculation Memorandum.

November 25, 2013.

Southern California Association of Governments ( SCAG). 2008. Orange County RTIP, Project Listing Report. Accessed at: www.scag.ca.gov.

URS Corporation. 2010a. Traffic Impact Analysis - Bristol Street Widening Project Phase III Civic Center Drive to Seventeenth Street. September 2010.
2010b. Community Impact Assessment - Bristol Street Widening Project Civic Center Drive to Seventeenth Street (Phase III). October 2010.
2011a. Natural Environment Study ( Minimal Impacts) - Bristol Street Widening Project Civic Center Drive to Seventeenth Street ( Phase III). April 2011. 201 lb. Final Relocation Impact Statement- Bristol Street Widening Project Civic Center Drive to Seventeenth Street (Phase III). November 2011.
2012a. Historic Resources Evaluation Report - Bristol Street Widening Project Civic Center Drive to Seventeenth Street (Phase III). September 2012.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 57 City Council 16 – 100 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue 2012b. Air Quality Conformity Analysis — Bristol Street Widening Project Civic Center Drive to 17 "' Street (Phase III). November 2012.
2012c. Noise Study Report — Bristol Street Widening Project Civic Center Drive to 17d' Street Phase III). March 2012.
2013a. Air Quality Assessment Report — Bristol Street Widening Project Civic Center Drive to 170' Street (Phase III). January 2013.
2013b. Initial Site Assessment — Bristol Street Widening Project Civic Center Drive to 171" Street Phase III). March 2013.

Wildan Associates. 1990. Final Environmental Impact Statement, Proposed Widening of Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane, in the City of Santa Ana. 1990.

ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU PAGE 58 City Council 16 – 101 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIB — Washington Avenue to 17°i Street

APPENDIX A MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A City Council 16 – 102 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase HIS — Washington Avenue to 17`" Street

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLYLEFT BLANK
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A City Council 16 – 103 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIB — Washington Avenue to I 7 Street Modified Initial Study Checklist
The following Modified Initial Study Checklist is based on the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA) Initial Study Checklist. It is modified to evaluate the proposed Project changes for which environmental impact reports /statements have previously been completed to assist in the determination of the need for supplemental environmental documents, in this case, a Subsequent or Supplemental EIS /EIR or an Addendum under Public Resources Code 21166 and Guideline Sections 15162, 15163, and 15164, respectively. For purposes of this study, references to " the proposal' in the left hand column questions refer to the modifications to the Project ( proposed Project) as compared the Project improvements evaluated in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

The first four columns to the right of the modified checklist questions identify whether the proposed Project changes would result in new impacts, and if so whether these impacts would be less than significant, less than significant after mitigation, or significant.

The fifth column asks whether or not the impacts associated with Project changes, if any, were sufficiently disclosed in the previous environmental documents ( Not Addressed).

Finally, the last column indicates whether or not a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR is needed.

Moreover, a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR would be needed if there were new significant unmitigated or substantially more severe impacts which would result from the Project changes and which were not sufficiently disclosed in the previous environmental documents.

Discussion in support of the conclusions indicated on the checklist is provided in Chapter 3.

ANA 305 -01 I ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/2015) YU APPENDIX A City Council 16 – 104 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIB — Washington Avenue to 17" Street

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
ANA 305 - 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA ( 01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A New Impacts of Proposed PreviousFEIS /EIR -
Project Changes
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent. or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After Impact Required?
Mitigation
C AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a X
scenic vista? YES NO
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, X N/A NO
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within
a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual X YES NO
character or quality of the site and its
surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light X YES NO
or glare, which would adversely affect day
or nighttime views in the area?

2.. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES.

Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique X N/ A NO
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance ( Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for X N/ A NO
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or X N/ A NO
cause rezoning, of, forest land ( as defined
in Public Resources Code section
12220( g)), timberland ( as defined by Public
Resources Code section 4526), or
timberland zoned Timberland Production
as defined by Government Code section
51104( g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or X N/ A NO
conversion of forest land to non - forest
use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing X N/ A NO
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non - agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non - forest
use?

3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation X YES NO
of the applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or X YES NO
contribute substantially to an existing or
projected air quality violation?
ANA 305 - 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA ( 01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A City Council 16 – 105 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIB — Washington Avenue to 1716 Street

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
ANA 305 - 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA ( 01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A New impacts of Proposed Previous FEIS /EIR
Project Changes.

No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After Impact Required?
Mitigation
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable X YES NO
net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non - attainment
under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard ( including
releasing emissions which exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to X YES NO
substantial pollutant concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a X YES NO
substantial number of people?

4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the
project:..

X YES NO
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special- status species in local
or regional plans, policies, or regulations,
or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?

X YES NO
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on
any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations or
by the California Department of Fish and
Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?

X YES NO
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands as defined by
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal
pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other
means?

X YES NO
d) Interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?

X YES NO
e) Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological resources,
such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
ANA 305 - 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA ( 01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A City Council 16 – 106 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIB — Washington Avenue to 17' Street

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
ANA 305- 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA ( 01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A New Impacts of Proposed Previous: FEIS /EIR
Project Changes
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After Impact Required?
Mitigation

X YES NO
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
S. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the
project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in

X YES NO
the significance of a historical resource as
defined in § 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in X YES NO
the significance of an archaeological
resource pursuant to § 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique

X YES NO
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?

X N/A NO
d) Disturb any human remains, including
those Interred outside of formal
cemeteries?

6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the
project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the
risk of loss, injury, or death involving:

X YES NO
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent AlquistPriolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area
or based on other substantial evidence of
a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines
and Geology Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?

X YES NO

X YES NO
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?

X YES NO
iv) Landslides?

X YES NO
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the
loss of topsoil?
ANA 305- 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA ( 01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A City Council 16 – 107 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIB — Washington Avenue to 17" Street

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
NewImpacts of Proposed Previous FEIS /EIR
Project Changes
No Less Than LessThan Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant. Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After Impact Required?
Mitigation

X YES NO
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that
is unstable, or that would become unstable
as a result of the project, and potentially
result In on- or off -site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or
collapse?

X YES NO
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined
in Table 18 -1 - B of the Uniform Building
Code (1994), creating substantial risks to
life or property?

X N/ A NO
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?

7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS.

Would the project
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, X NO NO
either directly or indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy X NO NO
or regulation adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of greenhouse
gases?

8. HAZARDS. Would the project Involve:

X YES NO
a) Create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment through the routine
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?

X YES NO
b) Create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?

X N/ A NO
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,
substances, or waste within one - quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?

X YES NO
d) Be located on a site which is included
on a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962. 5 and, as a result, would it
create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment?

X N/ A NO
e Fora project located within an airport
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU City Council 16 – 108 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIB — Washington Avenue to 17° i Street

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
ANA 305 - 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA ( 01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A New Impacts of Proposed Previous FEIS /EIR.

Project Changes .

No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant - Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact'- After Impact Required?
Mitigation
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would
the project result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the project
area?

X N/ A NO
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, would the project result in a
safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically

X YES NO
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a

X N/ A NO
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas
or where residences are intermixed with
wildlands?

9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or

X YES NO
waste discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater

X YES NO
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or
a lowering of the local groundwater table
level (e. g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses
or planned uses for which permits have
been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage

1. X YES NO
pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner that would
result in substantial erosion or siltation onor off -site? ANA 305 - 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA ( 01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A City Council 16 – 109 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIB — Washington Avenue to 17°i Street

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
ANA 305 - 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA ( 01/ 19 / 2015) YU APPENDIX A New Impacts of Proposed - Previous FEWER
Project Changes
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental SIR Impact After Impact Required?
Mitigation

X YES NO
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including
through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase
the rate or amount of surface runoff in a
mannerthat would result in flooding on- or
off -site?
X
YES NO
e) Create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned storm water drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?

X YES NO
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water
quality?

X YES NO
g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood
hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood
Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate
Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?

X YES NO
h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard
area structures which would impede or
redirect flood flows?
XI ........... YES NO
1) Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?

X N/ A NO
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or
mudflow?

10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would
the project:

X N/A NO
a) Physically divide an established
community?

X YES NO
b) Conflict with any applicable land use
plan, policy, or regulation of an agency
with jurisdiction over the project (including,
but not limited to the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?

X N/A NO
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat
conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan?
ANA 305 - 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA ( 01/ 19 / 2015) YU APPENDIX A City Council 16 – 110 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIB — Washington Avenue to 17" Street

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
New Impacts of Proposed - Previous: FEIS /EIR '.

Project Changes
No Less. Than' Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequentor Impact Significant Significant Significant Died ad? Supplemental EIR Impact After Impact Required?
Mitigation

11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a

X YES NO
known mineral resource that would be of
value to the region and the residents of the
state?

X YES NO
b) Result in the loss of availability of a
locally - important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local general
plan, specific plan or other land use plan?

12. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of

X YES NO
noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of

X YES NO
excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in

X YES NO
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic

X YES NO
increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport

X N/ A NO
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would
the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive
noise levels?
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A City Council 16 – 111 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase 11113— Washington Avenue to 1716 Street

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
New Impacts of Proposed Previous FEIS /EIR.

Project Changes
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequentor Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After Impact Required ?.

Mitigation

X N/ A NO
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?

13. POPULATION AND HOUSING.

Would the project:

X YES NO
a) Induce substantial population growth in
an area, either directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?

X YES NO
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?

X YES NO
c) Displace substantial numbers of people
necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?

14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the
project result in substantial adverse
physical Impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new
or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental
Impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response
times or other performance objectives .
for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection? X YES NO
b) Police protection? X YES NO
c) Schools? X YES NO
d) Parks? X YES NO
e) Other public facilities? X YES NO

15. RECREATION

X YES NO
a) Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
ANA 305 -011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA (01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A City Council 16 – 112 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIB — Washington Avenue to 17fh Street

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
ANA 305 - 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA ( 01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A New Impacts of Proposed Previous FEISIEIR
ProjectChanges
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After Impact Required?
Mitigation

X YES NO
b) Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities that
might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment?

16. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would
the project:

X YES NO
a) Conflict with an applicable plan,
ordinance or policy establishing measures
of effectiveness for the performance of the
circulation system, taking into account all
modes of transportation including mass
transit and non - motorized travel and
relevant components of the circulation
system, including but not limited to
intersections, streets, highways and
freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths,
and mass transit?

X YES NO
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion
management program, including, but not
limited to level of service standards and
travel demand measures, or other
standards established by the county
congestion management agency for
designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns,

X NO NO
including either an increase in traffic levels
or a change in location that results in
substantial safety risks?
J) Substantially increase hazards due to a

X YES NO
design feature ( e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e. g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency

X YES NO
access?

X YES NO
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or
programs regarding public transit, bicycle,
or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise
decrease the performance or safety of
such facilities?

17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS.

Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment

X YES NO
requirements of the applicable Regional
Water Quality Control Board?
ANA 305 - 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA ( 01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A City Council 16 – 113 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase 1118 — Washington Avenue to I 7 Street

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
ANA 305 - 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA ( 01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A Now impacts of Proposed Previous FE161EIR
Project Changes
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequentor Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental ElR' Impact After Impact Required ?.

Mitigation

X YES NO
b) Require or result in the construction of
new water or wastewater treatment
facilities or expansion of existing facilities,
the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?

X YES NO
c) Require or result in the construction of
new storm water drainage facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?

X YES NO
d) Have sufficient water supplies available
to serve the project from existing
entitlements and resources, or are new or
expanded entitlements needed?

X YES NO
e) Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's
projected demand in addition to the
provider' s existing commitments?

X YES NO
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient
permitted capacity to accommodate the
project's solid waste disposal needs?

1. X YES NO
g) Comply with federal, state, and local
statutes and regulations related to solid
waste?
18,. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE. Responses to the
following questions are discussed in
Chapter 3.

X YES NO
a) Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self- sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are X YES NO
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ( "Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current
ANA 305 - 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA ( 01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A City Council 16 – 114 9/17/2024

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTADDENDUM
Bristol Street Widening Phase IIIB — Washington Avenue to 17°i Street

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
ANA 305 - 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA ( 01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A New Impacts of Proposed Previous FEIS /EIR
Project Changes
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequentor Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After Impact Required?
Mitigation
projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental

X YES NO
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
Note: N/ A = Not applicable

19. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)( 3)( D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are " Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated ", describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project.

Responses to this section are discussed further in Chapter 3.

ANA 305 - 011 ( PER 02) CITY OF SANTA ANA ( 01/ 19/ 2015) YU APPENDIX A City Council 16 – 115 9/17/2024
CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 24/25CIP

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT NEED:

Bristol St Improvements & Widening:

Phase 3A - Civic Center-Washington
The Bristol Street Improvements project was planned and designed to incorporate complete street concepts with storm drain quality features.

The improvements include widening of the street from four lanes to six lanes, with bus turnouts, raised median, bike lanes, and sound walls. The project also brings native and organic landscaping that beautifies a fully developed urban area.

Bristol Street from Civic Center to Washington (Phase 3A) is part of the City's plan to widen Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane, which was approved by City Council in 1990 and reevaluated in 2015.

Existing roadway has only 2 lanes in each direction and is operating at a LOS F. This widening is needed to improve traffic flow and create complete streets features.

PROJECT CATEGORY:

Street Improvements
Street/Bridge Improvements &
Widening

LOCATION MAP
PROJECT COSTS FY 24/25
5,199,933
5,199,933
FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31
Construction - - - - - -

TOTAL - - - - - -

SOURCE OF FUNDS
DEMO
FY 24/25
656,000
FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

OCTA BRISTOL ST CORRIDOR

TSIA AREA F
3,343,933
1,200,000
TOTAL 5,199,933
AGENCY: DIVISION: CONTACT: DATE:

Public Works CIP Engineering Jason Gabriel, Principal Civil Engineer 21-Aug-2024 City Council 16 – 116 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 117 9/17/2024
EXHIBIT 7
City Council 16 – 118 9/17/2024
City Council 16 – 119 9/17/2024
Public Works Agency & Library Services
www.santa-ana.org/public-works
Item # 17
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
September 17, 2024
TOPIC: Newhope Library Modernization and Delhi Library Branch Improvements

AGENDA TITLE
Award a Construction Contract to PCN3, Inc. for the Newhope Library Modernization and Delhi Library Branch Improvements Project and an Agreement to Shade Structures, Inc. dba USA Shade & Fabric Structures for a shade structure at Newhope Library (Project Nos. 22-1802, 23-7540 & 22-1382) (General and Non-General Fund) (Revive Santa Ana)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $9,132,303, which includes $8,215,533 for the construction contract, $95,217 for contract administration, and a $821,533 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work.

2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Capital Improvement Program to include $9,132,303 for the Newhope Library Modernization and Delhi Library Improvements.

3. Award a construction contract to PCN3, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid and alternate bid in the amount of $8,215,533 for construction of the Newhope Library Modernization and Delhi Center Library Branch Project, for a term beginning September 17, 2024 and ending upon project completion, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.

4. Approve an agreement with Shade Structures, Inc. dba USA Shade & Fabric Structures for the design and build of a 20-foot by 30-foot cantilever shade structure at the Newhope Library for a total not to exceed of $68,341, for a term beginning September 17, 2024 and expiring December 31, 2025 with provision for a one-year extension, and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement (Agreement No. A-2024-XXX).

5. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER-2024-43 was filed for Project 22-1802.

City Council 17 – 1 9/17/2024
Newhope Library Modernization and Delhi Library Branch Improvements September 17, 2024

Page 2 ends

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
The Library strives to be a safe and inclusive community hub. Libraries serve as a third place in the community, beyond work and home, where residents of all ages have an opportunity to connect, create, and learn. Modernizing and expanding library facilities is essential to ensuring Santa Ana’s libraries offer the high quality of services seen in other surrounding jurisdictions. Additionally, the Public Works Agency (PWA)’s Engineering Services is responsible for the administration and oversight of all Capital Improvement Projects in the City. To this end, the Newhope Library Branch Modernization Project and the Delhi Library Branch Improvement Project will offer the following enhancements to the Santa Ana Public Library system:

Renovation of the Newhope Library Branch includes:
• A new, colorful, and inviting building façade.
• A new glass storefront-style entrance and lobby.
• A new and modernized customer service, reference, and check-out desk. • Creation of a new “Innovation Center” equipped with computers, robotics, and technology for STEM focused programs and services.
• A fully renovated outdoor patio with new seating and shade structure. • Remodel of antiquated staff work areas.
• Replacement of original and end of life HVAC systems, windows, and roof.

Construction of the Delhi Library Branch includes:
• Combining three existing rooms into an innovative indoor/outdoor public library space inside the Delhi Center.
• Installation of a roll-up “garage-style” door to allow the exterior and interior of the Library to feel like one cohesive space.
• Installation of a special “Knowledge Bar” for staff to assist patrons with technology and information needs.
• Creation of a new multigenerational outdoor play and learning area with built-in story time and program spaces.
• Creation of a new exterior public entrance and restroom that will allow for the Delhi Library Branch to be its own independently operating space within the Delhi Center.

Public Outreach and Contractor Participation
City Council 17 – 2 9/17/2024
Newhope Library Modernization and Delhi Library Branch Improvements September 17, 2024

Page 3 ends

The City notified a total of six vendors via PlanetBids that were pre-qualified through RFQ #23-168, none of which were Santa Ana based. Furthermore, staff specifically reached out to these vendors to encourage their participation.

As legally required, a Notice Inviting Bids was advertised in the Orange County Register newspaper on June 4 and June 10, 2024. The project was also advertised in PlanetBids from May 31, 2024 through July 24, 2024. Bids were received electronically via PlanetBids on July 24, 2024.

One bid protest was submitted by PCL Construction to PCN3, Inc., in regards to PCN3, Inc.’s submitted documentation. As all required documentation was received, staff has deemed the protest insufficient for rebid and recommends awarding the project to PCN3, Inc.

Base Bid Results Summary
Rank Bidder’s Name Location Base Bid
1 PCN3, Inc. Los Alamitos, CA $8,190,533
2 PCL Construction Services, Inc. Irvine, CA $8,649,777 3 Morillo Construction, Inc. Pasadena, CA $9,364,033
A total of three bids were received and all were deemed responsive. PCN3, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive base bid in the amount of $8,190,533 (Exhibit 2). As specified in the bid documents, the lowest bid shall be determined on the basis of the Base Bid. Based on the bid analysis and a contractor’s reference check, staff recommends awarding the construction contract, including the bid alternate in the amount of $25,000 for exterior painting of the Delhi Library Branch, to PCN3, Inc. for a total agreement amount of $8,215,533 (Exhibit 3).

PCN3, Inc. has not performed work as a prime contractor for the City of Santa Ana. A reference check was made by staff and good reviews were received regarding the quality of work performed by the contractor on previous projects.

Project Delivery
To deliver a complete project, in addition to the construction contract, the estimated total project delivery cost includes budget allocation for construction administration. On June 6, 2023, City Council awarded a contract to Griffin Structures to provide day-to-day construction management services, inspections of the Contractor’s work to ensure contract compliance, workmanship, and quality; and materials testing. Construction administration includes implementation of the labor requirements; and oversight of Griffin Structures. Any of the allocated construction administration funds not spent are City Council 17 – 3 9/17/2024
Newhope Library Modernization and Delhi Library Branch Improvements September 17, 2024

Page 4 ends

considered project savings and are returned to the respective fund balance upon close out of the project.

In addition to the Construction Contract Bid Amount, Staff requests that City Council allocate and authorize a project contingency budget equal to 10% of the Contract Bid Amount. The recommended contingency budget will allow Staff to execute contract change orders in the event unexpected conditions arise or if additional work is required to effectively deliver the project.

As indicated in the Cost Analysis (Exhibit 4) and as summarized in the table below, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $9,132,303.

Project Item Total
Construction Contract Bid Amount $8,215,533
Construction Administration $95,217
Inspection $0
(Griffin Structures)
Testing $0
(Griffin Structures)
Project Contingencies $821,553
Total Estimated Construction Delivery Cost $9,132,303
USA Shade Structures, Inc.

Shade Structures, Inc. dba USA Shade & Fabric Structures (“USA Shade”) is a fullservice design/build fabric shade structure manufacturer. USA Shade will design and build a 20 x 30-foot cantilever shade structure to be installed in the Newhope Library patio. The patio is being improved as part of the Newhope Library Modernization Project and will offer additional security and functionality improvements to this important branch library.

The new shade structure will replace an antiquated pergola that currently provides very little shade protection and offers an easy way for trespassers to climb and access the building’s roof. The new shade structure will eliminate the climbable beams at the top of the existing pergola and replace it with a durable fabric canopy that will provide the area with more shade for the community to enjoy library materials, programs, and services.

USA Shade provides its services via Sourcewell, a cooperative government purchasing agency offering competitively solicited and awarded contracts. Santa Ana City Municipal Code Section 2-807 authorizes the City to purchase against contracts awarded by any public agency employing a competitive bid process. Since the City of Santa Ana is a Sourcewell member, it can obtain competitive pricing and services from USA Shade in accordance with Sourcewell Contract No. 010521-LTS-6. City staff opted to procure this custom shade structure separately from the larger Newhope Library Modernization scope, due the item having a longer lead time and because USA Shade is currently a City Council 17 – 4 9/17/2024
Newhope Library Modernization and Delhi Library Branch Improvements September 17, 2024

Page 5 ends

Sourcewell vendor that successfully delivered the design and build of the existing Children’s Patio shade structures at the Main Library. Staff recommends awarding an agreement to USA Shade for the design and build of a 20-foot by 30-foot cantilever shade structure at the Newhope Library (Exhibit 5).

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review pursuant to Sections 15301(a) and 15301(d) of the CEQA Guidelines for projects consisting of interior and exterior alterations, as well as restoration or rehabilitation of structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, and windows.

The proposed project continues to meet these parameters of the CEQA Guidelines, and Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER-2024-34 was filed for Project 22- 1381 on May 7, 2024. (Exhibit 6)

FISCAL IMPACT
As indicated in the Cost Analysis, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project (22-1802, 23-7540, 22-1382) is $9,132,303. Funding within Funds 181, 011, 012, 152, and 135 will be presented to City Council for approval of carry forward to FY 24-25 (Exhibit 7) as part of the citywide carry forward process. Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be presented to City Council for carry forward to FY 2025-26.

Funding within Fund 152 is derived from a California State Library Building Forward Grant for the Newhope Library Modernization Project. The Library has received and appropriated the first grant payment for construction in the amount of $532,722. The Library can submit claims for the remaining construction funds in the amount of $532,723 once the project moves forward.

The following table summarizes the funds budgeted for expenditure to deliver the construction of this project:

Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit - Account
No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account No. Description Amount
Budget Available via Proposed Carry Forward to FY 24-25 2024-25
18111013-
66200
(22-1382)
American
Rescue Plan
Act (ARPA)
ARPA – Library, Buildings
& Building Improvements $3,165,533
City Council 17 – 5 9/17/2024
Newhope Library Modernization and Delhi Library Branch Improvements September 17, 2024

Page 6 ends

Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit - Account
No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account No. Description Amount
2024-25
01211020-
66200
(22-1382)
Cannabis
Public Benefit
Fund
Library Youth Services –
Buildings & Building
Improvements
$316,553
2024-25
01111017-
66200
(22-1382)
General Fund
Library – Service
Enhancement – Buildings
& Building & Improvements
$40,407
2024-25
18111013-
66200
(22-1802)
American
Rescue Plan
Act (ARPA)
ARPA – Library, Buildings
& Building Improvements $3,604,972
2024-25
01211020-
66200
(22-1802)
Cannabis
Public Benefit
Fund
Library Youth Services –
Buildings & Building
Improvements
$408,143
2024-25
15211154-
66200
(22-1802)
Public Library
Grant Fund
Building Forward Library
Grant, Buildings & Building
Improvements
$532,722
2024-25
13518783-
66220
(23-7540)
Community
Development
Block Grant
CDBG Programs,
Improvements Other Than
Buildings
$531,250
Future Grant Revenue to be Dispersed
2024-25
15211154-
69011
(22-1802)
Public Library
Grant Fund
Building Forward Library
Grant, Reserve
Appropriation
532,723
TOTAL $9,132,303
The following table summarizes the funds budgeted for expenditure for the agreement with Shade Structures, Inc. dba USA Shade & Fabric Structures:

Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit - Account
No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account No. Description Amount
Budget Available via Proposed Carry Forward to FY 24-25 2024-25
01211020-
66200
(22-1802)
Cannabis
Public
Benefit Fund
Library Youth Services -
Buildings & Building
Improvements
$68,341
TOTAL $68,341
City Council 17 – 6 9/17/2024
Newhope Library Modernization and Delhi Library Branch Improvements September 17, 2024

Page 7 ends

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Location Map & Concept Plans

2. Bid Proposal

3. Construction Contract

4. Cost Analysis

5. Shade Structures Inc. Contract

6. Environmental Determination

7. FY 2024-25 Capital Improvement Program Sheet
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Brian Sternberg, Executive Director of Library Services Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council 17 – 7 9/17/2024
EXHIBIT 1
SANTA ANA PROJECT 22-1802 & 22-1382 Ip I CITY COUNCIL NEWHOPE LIBARY MODERNIZATION& ,. WA f AGENDA DATE: DELHI CENTER LIBRARY BRANCH PROJECT !1----.... �
PTEMBER 17, 20 4 LOCATION MAP le Li&IICY

SANTA ANA
<AU
PAGE 1 OF 2
EXHIBIT 1
City Council 17 – 8 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 9 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 10 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 11 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 12 9/17/2024
PWA

SANTA ANA

PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
EXHIBIT 2
PAGE 2 OF 2

LOCATION MAP

DELHI CENTER LIBRARY BRANCH PROJECT

NEWHOPE LIBARY MODERNIZATION&
PROJECT 22-1802 & 22-1382
SEPTEMBER 17, 2024
AGENDA DATE:

CITY COUNCIL
City Council 17 – 13 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 14 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 15 9/17/2024
M
O
B
LI E
M
O
BIL
E
M
O
B
LI E

BOM ELI MOBILE
U.C. Refr.

NEW METAL STUD WALL PER SHEET A61.1

EXISTING METAL STUD WALL

EXISTING CONCRETE WALL

NOT IN SCOPE
2-HR RATED FIRE BARRIER
1-HR RATED FIRE PARTITION

WALL TYPE ANNOTATIONS, SEE SHEET
A61.1 FOR DETAILS
1 101 NUMBER INDICATES DOOR PER SCHEDULE,
REFER TO SHEET A52.1

NUMBER INDICATED WINDOW PER SCHEDULE,
REFER TO SHEET A53.1
FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET PER DET. XX/XX
FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES:

1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTERLINE OF THE GRID LINES AND/OR TO THE FACE OF STUDS, U.N.O.

2. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL WALLS ARE FULL HEIGHT.

3. REFER TO SHEET GEN-4 FOR TYPICAL ACCESSIBILTY REQUIREMENTS AND DIMENSIONS.

4. REFER TO ENLARGED PLANS FOR DIMENSIONS AND CALLOUTS NOT SHOWN HERE.
1i
60" MIN. ACCESSIBLE WHEELCHAIR

CLEAR TURNING SPACE
CLR.
60" MIN.
30"X48" MIN. ACCESSIBLE WHEELCHAIR

CLEAR FLOOR SPACE
30"X48"
CLR.
1-HR RATED FIRE BARRIER
504 SF

CHILDRENS
AREA
5 293 SF
TEEN
AREA
4 1080 SF

GENERAL
STACKS
3 57 SF

RESTROOM
2 275 SF
OFFICE
1 124000.D
E132
124000.M 124000.M
205 SF

READING
AREA
7 5' - 0"
1' - 0" 1' - 0" 1' - 0"
1 A22.1
2 A22.1
2' - 7"
107100.B
107100.B
064100.B
064100.B
064100.B
12' - 1"
12' - 1"
12' - 1"
124000.P
124000.P
124000.S
124000.T
124000.U
124000.V
30X48 CLEAR
3' - 9"
064100.I
124000.O

MOBILEMOBILEMOBILE
MOBILE
124000.O
064100.K
4' - 9"

THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION PROPRIETARY TO SVA ARCHITECTS INC. AND IS FURNISHED IN CONFIDENCE FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF EVALUATION, BIDDING OR REVIEW. THIS DOCUMENT OR ITS CONTENTS MAY

NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE AND MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED OR

SCALE:

REVISIONS: OWNER:

PROJECT NAME:CLIENT ADDRESS:
6 HUTTON CENTRE DR, SUITE 1150 SANTA ANA, CA 92707
T 949.809.3380 WWW.SVA-ARCHITECTS.COM
DATE ISSUED:

PROJECT NO:
1/4" = 1'-0"
Issue Date
A11.6

IMPROVEMENTS -

FURNITURE
PLAN
#2022-40198

CITY OF SANTA ANA

DELHI COMMUNITY CENTERRENOVATION
505 E Central Ave, Unit B, Santa Ana, CA 92707
PROPOSED FURNITURE PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 FLOOR PLAN LEGEND 064100.B WALL-MOUNTED COUNTERTOP, SEE DET. 03/A63.3
064100.I ONE SIDED LIBRARY SHELVING, OFCI
064100.K WALL-MOUNTED COUNTERTOP, SEE DET. 05/A63.3
107100.B (N) FLOOR MOUNTED DESIGNER CLEAR SECURITY GATE LIB-180 RFID SCANNER, SEE SPECS FOR TYPE/SIZE, OFOI
124000.D 4 TOP CIRCULAR TABLE AND CHAIRS, TYP., OFOI
124000.M NEW RIVELI MODULAR FOLDING SHELVING SYSTEM, OFCI 124000.O MOBILE BOOK CARTS, OFOI
124000.P CHILDERENS FURNITURE, TYP., OFOI
124000.S 8 TOP WORKING TABLE WITH INDIVIDUAL SEAT DIVIDERS,

FLUSH MOUNTED POWER PROVIDED, OFOI
124000.T WORKSTATIONS, OFOI
124000.U MOBILE BOOK CARTS, OFOI
124000.V BOOK DROPOFF COLLECTION BIN, OFOI
E132 INKJET PRINTER, OFOI

KEYNOTES

DESCRIPTION DATE
N
City Council 17 – 16 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 17 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 18 9/17/2024
EXHIBIT 3

CITY OF SANTA ANA

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
PROJECT 22-1802 & 23-1385

NEWHOPE LIBRARY MODERNIZATION & DELHI LIBRARY BRANCH IMPROVMENTS This CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT is made and entered into this 17th day of September, 2024 by and between the City of Santa Ana, California, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter “CITY”), and PCN3, Inc. (hereinafter “CONTRACTOR”).

WITNESSETH:

The CITY and the CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows:

1. CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all the work and furnish all the materials at its own cost and expense necessary to construct and complete in a good and workmanlike manner and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the CITY, the Newhope Library Modernization and Delhi Library Branch Improvements Project (hereinafter referred to as the “WORK OF IMPROVEMENT”) identified in and in accordance with the Contract Documents prepared by the City’s Public Works Agency and approved by the City Council.

2. The complete Construction Contract consists of the “Contract Documents” as defined by the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and which include the following:
 Notice Inviting Bids
 Information to Bidders
 Bid Proposal
 Bid Bond
 Contract Form
 Contract Bonds
 General Provisions
 Special Provisions
 Technical Provisions and Project Plans
 Community Workforce Agreement
 Appendices
In case of conflict between the Contract Documents, the precedence of documents shall be as established in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction.

3. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT the sum total amount not to exceed Eight Million Two Hundred Fifteen Thousand Five Hundred Thirty Three Dollars and No Cents ($8,215,533.00), as set forth and identified in the BID PROPOSAL, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A,” and in accordance with Section 2-7.1 of the Greenbook: Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction.
rev. 09/01/2017 Page 1 of 4
City Council 17 – 19 9/17/2024
The BID PROPOSAL contains a schedule of unit price(s) or lump sum(s) based on approximate quantities only, and the City does not expressly or by implication agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class or portion of the work or to omit portions of the work as may be deemed necessary or advisable.

4. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT within the time specified in the Time for Completion of Improvements section of the BID PROPOSAL (Exhibit “A”) including commencing construction within the timeframe therein specified after issuance of a Notice to Proceed.

5. The CONTRACTOR will pay, and will require all subcontractors to pay, all employees on the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT a salary or wage at least equal to the prevailing salary or wage established for such work as set forth in the wage determinations for this work in accordance with applicable State and Federal law.

6. If applicable, the CONTRACTOR shall adhere to the CITY’S Community Workforce Agreement (CWA), a pre-hire collective bargaining agreement, which establishes the labor relations policies and procedures for CONTRACTOR to follow in the crafts persons employed to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT as more fully described in the CWA. The CWA may be found on the City’s website at: http://www.santa-ana.org/pwa/documents/CWA.pdf

7. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish two bonds to be approved by the CITY, one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price, to guarantee the faithful performance of the work (Performance Bond), and one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price to guarantee payment of all claims for labor and materials furnished (Payment Bond). This Contract shall not become effective until such bonds are supplied to and approved by the CITY.

8. CONTRACTOR shall, prior to the release of the performance and payment bonds or the retention payment, furnish a warranty performance and payment bond (Warranty Bond). Said Warranty Bond shall also be required as a condition of project acceptance. For projects up to Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) or Twenty Percent (20%) of the final contract price. For projects above Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) or Ten Percent (10%) of the final contract price.

9. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish Certificates of Liability Insurance and Worker’s Compensation Insurance as outlined in the General Provisions, to be approved by the CITY.

10. INDEMNIFICATION.

To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONTRACTOR and its Subcontractors hereby agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, employees, representatives and volunteers (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Indemnitees"), through legal counsel acceptable to CITY, from and against any liability, claims, actions, costs, damages or losses, including reasonable costs and attorney’s fees, for injury, including death to any person or damage to any property, arising directly or indirectly from, or in any manner relating to, any of the following:

Page 2 of 4 ends

City Council 17 – 20 9/17/2024
(i) Performance or nonperformance of the Work of Improvement by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier;
(ii) Performance or nonperformance by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, of any of the obligations under the Contract Documents; (iii) The construction activities of CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, either on the project site or on other properties;
(iv) The payment or nonpayment by CONTRACTOR of any of its Subcontractors of any lower tier, for Work of Improvement performed on or off the project site; and Any personal injury, property damage or economic loss to third persons related to and arising from the performance or nonperformance by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, of the Work of Improvement.
(v)
(vi) The indemnity obligations of Subcontractors provided by this Section shall be included in all subcontract documents issued by CONTRACTOR.

Nothing in the Contract Documents shall be construed to give rise to any implied right of indemnity in favor of CONTRACTOR against CITY or any other Indemnitee.

11. FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS.

Contractor shall comply, and ensure all subcontractors comply, with all applicable regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program set forth by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for sub-recipients including, without limitation, the funding requirements laid out in Appendix P of the Contract Documents. Contractor’s attention is specifically directed to the following, which are each incorporated herein by this reference:
(i) 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards).
(ii) Program Income – 24 CFR Part 570.500(a)(1)
(iii) Unused Program Income – 24 CFR Part 570.503(b)(3) (iv)
(v)
Transfers of Program Income – 24 CFR Part 570.504(b)(2) Disposition of Program Income – 24 CFR Part 570.504(c)
(vi) Applicability of Uniform Administrative Requirements – 24 CFR § 570.502 (vii) Subpart K of the CDBG Regulations, commencing with 24 CFR § 570.600 (viii) Section 3 Requirements specified herein.
(ix) Federal Contract Provisions specified herein.

With respect to any conflict between such federal requirements and the terms of the Contract Documents and/or the provisions of state law and except as otherwise required under federal law or regulation, the more stringent requirement shall control. Contractor shall be subject to the Davis-Bacon Act. The federal minimum wage rates are attached hereto as Appendix O of the Contract Documents. When the DavisBacon wage rates and California prevailing wage rates differ for similar kinds of labor, the Contractor shall pay not less than the higher rate.

Contractor shall additionally comply with the applicable flow down terms and conditions of the CDBG Funding Agreement, which are attached hereto as Exhibit “B”, and incorporated herein by reference.

Nothing in the Contract Documents shall be construed to give rise to any implied right of indemnity in favor of CONTRACTOR against CITY or any other Indemnitee.

Page 3 of 4 ends

City Council 17 – 21 9/17/2024
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Construction Contract on the day and year first above written.

ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA
JENNIFER L. HALL
City Clerk
ALVARO NUÑEZ
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney
CONTRACTOR:

PCN3, Inc.

B
NAME: Brian Abghari
President
TITLE:

Assistant City Attorney
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

Digitally signed by Nabil
Saba
Date: 2024.08.29 14:25:39
-07'00'
Nabil Saba

NABIL SABA, PE
Executive Director
Public Works Agency

Page 4 of 4 ends

City Council 17 – 22 9/17/2024

EXHIBIT A
City Council 17 – 23 9/17/2024

EXHIBIT A
City Council 17 – 24 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 25 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 26 9/17/2024

EXHIBIT B
City Council 17 – 27 9/17/2024
Funding Approval/Agreement
Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act (Public Law 930383)
HI-00515R of 20515R
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Office of Community Planning and Development
Community Development Block Grant Program OMB Approval No. 2506-0193 exp 1/31/2025

1. Name of Grantee (as shown in item 5 of Standard Form 424) Santa Ana
3a. Grantee’s 9-digit Tax ID Number
956000785
3b. Grantee’s 9-digit DUNS Number
KZE9G2M4GRX9 (UEI)

2. Grantee’s Complete Address (as shown in item 5 of Standard Form 424) 20 Civic Center Plaza

4. Date use of funds may begin
07/01/2022
Santa Ana, CA 92701-0000 5a. Project/Grant No. 1
B-22-MC-06-0508
5b. Project/Grant No. 2
6a. Amount Approved
$5,088,771
6b. Amount Approved
Grant Agreement: This Grant Agreement between the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the above named Grantee is made pursuant to the authority of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, (42 USC 5301 et seq.). The Grantee’s submissions for Title I assistance, the HUD regulations at 24 CFR Part 570 (as now in effect and as may be amended from time to time), and this Funding Approval, including any special conditions, constitute part of the Agreement. Subject to the provisions of this Grant Agreement, HUD will make the funding assistance specified here available to the Grantee upon execution of the Agreement by the parties. The funding assistance specified in the Funding Approval may be used to pay costs incurred after the date specified in item 4 above provided the activities to which such costs are related are carried out in compliance with all applicable requirements. Pre-agreement costs may not be paid with funding assistance specified here unless they are authorized in HUD regulations or approved by waiver and listed in the special conditions to the Funding Approval. The Grantee agrees to assume all of the responsibilities for environmental review, decision making, and actions, as specified and required in regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to Section 104(g) of Title I and published in 24 CFR Part 58. The Grantee further acknowledges its responsibility for adherence to the Agreement by subrecipient entities to which it makes funding assistance hereunder available.

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (By Name) Grantee Name (Contractual Organization) Rufus Washington
Title
CPD Director
Signature
Santa Ana (City of)
Title
City Manager
Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Signature Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
10/21/2022
X X

7. Category of Title I Assistance for this Funding Action:

Entitlement, Sec 106(b)

8. Special Conditions
(check one)
None
9a. Date HUD Received Submission 10. check one
(mm/dd/yyyy)
9b. Date Grantee Notified
(mm/dd/yyyy)
a. Orig. Funding
Approval
b. Amendment
Amendment Number
Attached
9c. Date of Start of Program Year
7/1/2022

11. Amount of Community Development
Block Grant FY 2022
a. Funds Reserved for this Grantee
b. Funds now being Approved $5,088,771
c. Reservation to be Cancelled
(11a minus 11b)
12a. Amount of Loan Guarantee Commitment now being Approved 12b. Name and complete Address of Public Agency N/A
Loan Guarantee Acceptance Provisions for Designated Agencies:

The public agency hereby accepts the Grant Agreement executed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development on the above date with respect to the above grant number(s) as Grantee designated to receive loan guarantee assistance, and agrees to comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement, applicable regulations, and other requirements of HUD now or hereafter in effect, pertaining to the assistance provided it. 12c. Name of Authorized Official for Designated Public Agency Title
Signature
X
HUD Accounting use Only
Effective Date
Batch TAC (mm/dd/yyyy)
1 5 3
1 7 6
Program Y A Reg Area Document No. Project Number Category Amount F Y
Y
Project Number
Project Number
Amount
Amount
Date Entered PAS (mm/dd/yyyy) Date Entered LOCCS (mm/dd/yyyy) Batch Number Transaction Code Entered By Verified By 24 CFR 570 form HUD-7082 (5/15)
City Council 17 – 28 9/17/2024

8. Special Conditions.
(a) The period of performance and single budget period for the funding assistance specified in the Funding Approval shall each begin on the date specified in item 4 and shall each end on September 1, 2029. The Grantee shall not incur any obligations to be paid with such assistance after September 1, 2029.
(b) The Recipient shall attach a schedule of its indirect cost rate(s) in the format set forth below to the executed Agreement that is returned to HUD. The Recipient shall provide HUD with a revised schedule when any change is made to the rate(s) described in the schedule. The schedule and any revisions HUD receives from the Recipient shall be incorporated herein and made a part of this Agreement, provided that the rate(s) described comply with 2 CFR part 200, subpart E.

Administering Direct
Department/Agency Indirect cost rate Cost Base
_C_D_A_____________
________________
________________
________________
________________
_1_4_.9_2__%
______%
______%
______%
______%
_________
_________
_________
_________
_________
Instructions: The Recipient must identify each agency or department of the Recipient that will carry out activities under the grant, the indirect cost rate applicable to each department/agency (including if the de minimis rate is used per 2 CFR §200.414(f)), and the type of direct cost base to which the rate will be applied (for example, Modified Total Direct Costs (MTDC)). Do not include indirect cost rates for subrecipients.
(c)
(d)
In addition to the conditions contained on form HUD 7082, the grantee shall comply with requirements established by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) concerning the Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS); the System for Award Management (SAM.gov.); the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act as provided in 2 CFR part 25, Universal Identifier and General Contractor Registration; and 2 CFR part 170, Reporting Subaward and Executive Compensation Information.

The grantee shall ensure that no CDBG funds are used to support any Federal, State, or local projects that seek to use the power of eminent domain, unless eminent domain is employed only for a public use. For the purposes of this requirement, public use shall not be construed to include economic development that primarily benefits private entities. Any use of funds for mass transit, railroad, airport, seaport or highway projects as well as utility projects which benefit or serve the general public (including energy-related, communicationrelated, water- related and wastewater-related infrastructure), other structures City Council 17 – 29 9/17/2024
designated for use by the general public or which have other common-carrier or public-utility functions that serve the general public and are subject to regulation and oversight by the government, and projects for the removal of an immediate threat to public health and safety or brownfield as defined in the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act (Public Law 107 118) shall be considered a public use for purposes of eminent domain. (e)
(f)
The Grantee or unit of general local government that directly or indirectly receives CDBG funds may not sell, trade, or otherwise transfer all or any such portion of such funds to another such entity in exchange for any other funds, credits or non-Federal considerations, but must use such funds for activities eligible under title I of the Act.

E.O. 12372-Special Contract Condition - Notwithstanding any other provision of this agreement, no funds provided under this agreement may be obligated or expended for the planning or construction of water or sewer facilities until receipt of written notification from HUD of the release of funds on completion of the review procedures required under Executive Order (E.O.) 12372, Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs, and HUD's implementing regulations at 24 CFR Part 52. The recipient shall also complete the review procedures required under E.O. 12372 and 24 CFR Part 52 and receive written notification from HUD of the release of funds before obligating or expending any funds provided under this agreement for any new or revised activity for the planning or construction of water or sewer facilities not previously reviewed under E.O. 12372 and implementing regulations.
(g) CDBG funds may not be provided to a for-profit entity pursuant to section 105(a)(17) of the Act unless such activity or project has been evaluated and selected in accordance with Appendix A to 24 CFR 570 -
(Source -
P.L. 113-235, Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, Division K, Title II, Community Development Fund).

City Council 17 – 30 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 31 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 32 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 33 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 34 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 35 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 36 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 37 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 38 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 39 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 40 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 41 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 42 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 43 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 44 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 45 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 46 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 47 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 48 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 49 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 50 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 51 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 52 9/17/2024
EXHIBIT 4
Construction Contract 8,215,533.00 $
Contract Administration, Inspection and Testing 95,217.00 $ Contingencies 821,553.00 $
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 9,132,303.00
CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT NO. 22-1802 & 22-1381: Newhope Library Modernization and Delhi Library Branch Improvements Project

COST ANALYSIS
City Council 17 – 53 9/17/2024
EXHIBIT 5

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND SHADE STRUCTURES, INC., OBA SHADE & FABRIC STRUCTURES FOR PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION

OF A SHADE STRUCTURE AT THE NEWHOPE LIBRARY
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered inꢑo ꢑhiꢕ 17th dꢄy of September 2024 by and between Shade Stꢅuctures, Inc., a Texas corpoꢅaꢟꢁon dbꢄ USA Shade & Fabric Sꢟrucꢑureꢕ ("Conꢟꢅactoꢅ"), aꢏd the City ofSꢄnta Ana, a chaꢅter city and ꢈunꢁcꢁpal corꢌoration organized and exꢁꢕꢟing under the Conꢕꢟitution and lꢄws of the Staꢟe ofCaꢀꢁꢂꢃiꢄ ("City").

RECITALS
A. The City desꢁres ꢟo reꢟꢄin a conꢟrꢄctoꢅ hꢄving ꢕpeciaꢇ skiꢇl and knowledge in the deꢕign, procurement, ꢄnd ꢁnstallꢄꢟꢁon of ꢕhade structures ꢂꢅ the Ciꢟy's Newhope Librꢄry ("Project").

Contꢅacꢟor repreꢕenꢟs thꢄt Conꢟꢅactoꢅ iꢕ ꢄbꢔe and willing to ꢌꢅovide such services to ꢟhe Cꢁty.

Contractor hꢄꢕ ꢆꢇꢀ ꢄccess to the ꢋateriaꢀ ꢄnd speciaꢀ ꢌricing undeꢅ Sourcewell Conꢟract No. 010521-LTS-6 ("Cooꢌeꢅaꢟive Conꢟꢅacꢟ").

The City ꢁs a member of Souꢅcewell (Membeꢅ ID No. 1888) and iꢕ auꢟhorized ꢟo uꢕe ꢟhe Cooꢌeratꢁve Contꢅact ꢂr ꢌublꢁc works procurementꢕ, including ꢟhe maꢟerials ꢄnd serviceꢕ ꢅequired ꢂr ꢟhe Projecꢟ.

E. In uꢏderꢟaking the perꢂꢅꢈance of this Agꢅeement, Contracꢟor repꢅesenꢟꢕ ꢟhaꢟ it ꢁs knowledgeable in its field ꢄnd ꢟhꢄꢟ ꢄny ꢕervꢁces ꢉeꢅfonꢘed by Conꢟꢅacꢟor under thꢁs Agreement wiꢀl be ꢉerꢂꢅmed in coꢋꢌliance wiꢟh ꢕuch standards as ꢋay reaꢕonꢄbly be exꢌecꢟed ꢊoꢋ a ꢌroꢍssionꢄl conꢟracꢟing firm ꢁn ꢟhe field.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideꢅaꢟion of the mutual ꢄnd reꢕꢌecꢟꢁve promiꢕes, and subject to ꢟhe teꢅmꢕ and conditions ꢎereiꢏaꢐeꢅ set ꢂrꢑhꢒ the ꢌaꢓies ꢄgꢅee ꢄꢕ ꢂꢔlowꢕ:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES
a.
b.
c.

Contractor shaꢔl ꢌerꢖꢗꢘ the tꢄꢕks and obligaꢟions ꢁncludꢁng ꢄll lꢄboꢅ, mꢄteꢅꢁꢄlꢕ, toolꢕ, 12k reach ꢙꢅk and ꢕkꢁd ꢕꢟeer, and work requꢁꢅed ꢟo ꢚꢔꢀy and adequꢄꢟeꢀy coꢋꢌleꢟe ꢟhe servꢁceꢕ described and set ꢂꢛtꢜ in Conꢟꢅꢄctor's Pꢅoposaꢔ - Exhibit A, aꢟꢟꢄched hereto and incoꢅporaꢟed by ꢅeference.

Conꢟractor is noꢟ responsible ꢂr crane services, dꢅiꢀl rigꢕ, lꢄnd suꢅveying, field ꢋeasureꢋentꢕ, lꢄyouꢟ, conꢝꢞaꢟion of final location, above and below ground utilities, sprinklers/irꢅigation ꢕyꢕꢟeꢋs, cꢄulking, sealanꢟs, joint checks, traffic contꢅol ꢌlans, flagging, ꢌenniꢟꢕ, oꢅ a Stoꢠ Water Polꢇuꢟion Pꢅevention Plan.

The Project ꢕhall be deeꢋed comꢌleꢟe uꢌon ꢁts acceptance by the Cꢁty's Executꢁve Pꢄge 1 of 10
City Council 17 – 54 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 55 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 56 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 57 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 58 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 59 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 60 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 61 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 62 9/17/2024
Digitally signed by Nabil
Saba Nabil Saba Date: 2024.08.29 14:27:50
-07'00'
City Council 17 – 63 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 64 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 65 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 66 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 67 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 68 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 69 9/17/2024
EXHIBIT 6
City Council 17 – 70 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 71 9/17/2024
City Council 17 – 72 9/17/2024
CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 24/25CIP

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Newhope Library Renovation
PROJECT NEED:

Newhope Library, the 10,600-sq-ft Library remains in generally the same condition as when it was originally built in 1976. The renovation will include modernizing the overall Library branch, renovating the storefront of the building, remodeling the front checkout desk/staff area, remodeling kitchen/break area, creating a new Media Lab space, and replacing existing HVAC systems.

PROJECT TITLE:

Newhope Library Modernization
PROJECT CATEGORY:

City & Park Facility Improvements
Facility

LOCATION MAP
AGENCY: DIVISION: CONTACT: DATE:

Library Administration Maria Castro, Management Analyst- Library 28-Aug-2024 PROJECT COSTS FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 Construction 3,522,493 - - - - - -
TOTAL 3,522,493 - - - - - -
SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 ARPA Funds 3,165,533 - - - - - -
Cannabis 316,553 - - - - - -
GENERAL FUND 40,407 - - - - - -
TOTAL 3,522,493 - - - - - -
EXHIBIT 7
City Council 17 – 73 9/17/2024
CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 24/25CIP

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Delhi Library Branch Improvements
PROJECT NEED:

Delhi Center Library Branch is creation of new 2,500-sq-ft branch in existing community center. The City of Santa Ana has leased approximately 2,500 square feet of space at the Delhi Community Center for a new Library branch. The City intends to invest in subtenant improvements suitable for public library services, including an innovative storefront style entrance, indoor furniture, interior displays and cases, and the creation of an outdoor patio space for library programs, events and activities geared toward children and families.

The project will include combining three rooms into a larger Library space, creating a covered outdoor patio space with built-in story time seating and educational play area(s), and creating a new public entrance via the new outdoor patio.

PROJECT TITLE:

Delhi Library Branch Improvements
PROJECT CATEGORY:

City & Park Facility Improvements
Facility

LOCATION MAP
AGENCY: DIVISION: CONTACT: DATE:

Library Administration Maria Castro, Management Analyst- Library 28-Aug-2024 PROJECT COSTS FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 Construction 5,609,810 - - - - - -
TOTAL 5,609,810 - - - - - -
SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 ARPA Funds 3,604,972 - - - - - -
Cannabis 408,143 - - - - - -
CDBG Programs 531,250 - - - - - -
PUBLIC LIBRARY GRANT 1,065,445 - - - - - -
TOTAL 5,609,810 - - - - - -
City Council 17 – 74 9/17/2024
Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/public-works
Item # 18
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
September 17, 2024
TOPIC: Standard Avenue and McFadden Avenue Bikeways

AGENDA TITLE
Construction Contract with Vido Samarzich, Inc. for the Standard Avenue and McFadden Avenue Bikeways Projects (No. 19-6923, 20-6962, 20-6965, 23-6705, 23- 6706, & 23-6707) (General Fund) (Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $2,000,000 in prior-year fund balance in the Residential Street Improvement, Prior Year Carry Forward revenue account and appropriate the same amount into the Residential Street, Improvements Other Than Buildings, expenditure account. (Requires five affirmative votes)

2. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $2,700,000 in prior-year fund balance in the Transportation System Improvement Authorization Area B revenue account and appropriate the same amount into the Transportation System Improvement Authorization Area B Tustin, Improvements Other Than Buildings expenditure account. (Requires five affirmative votes)

3. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Capital Improvement Program to include an additional $5,900,000 in construction funds for the Standard Avenue and McFadden Avenue Bikeways Project (No. 19-6923, 20- 6962, 20-6965, 23-6705, 23-6706, & 23-6707).

4. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $23,550,000, which includes $19,170,060 for the construction contract; $2,462,934 for contract administration, inspection, and testing; and a $1,917,006 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work due to the complexity and extensive scope of this project.

5. Award a construction contract to Vido Samarzich, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid and bid alternates in the amount of $19,170,060, for construction of the Standard Avenue and McFadden Avenue Bikeways Project (No. 19-6923, 20-6962, 20-6965, 23-6705, 23-6706, & 23- City Council 18 – 1 9/17/2024
Standard Avenue and McFadden Avenue Bikeways
September 17, 2024

Page 2 ends

6707), for a term beginning September 17, 2024 and ending upon project completion, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.

6. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review pursuant to Article 19, Categorical Exemptions Sections 15301(c) and 15304(h). Categorical Exemption Environmental Review Nos. ER-2020-33 and ER-2020-97 were filed for Projects Nos. 20-6965 and 20-6962.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency (PWA)’s Engineering Services Division is responsible for the administration and oversight of all Capital Improvement Projects in the City. Additionally, PWA implements a variety of roadway improvements to promote the safety of drivers, bikers, and pedestrians. The Public Works Agency received $11,319,000 from the Traffic System Management Grant for the construction of bikeways. The Standard Avenue and McFadden Avenue Bikeway projects (Projects) were identified in the City’s Safe Mobility Santa Ana Plan (SMSA), Active Transportation Plan (ATP), and Central Santa Ana Complete Streets Plans (CSACS), hereinafter referred to as “Plans.” Each of these plans included extensive amounts of community outreach to ensure that any of the resulting project recommendations were a direct reflection of the community needs and wants. For each of the plans, Community Outreach Plans were developed by City staff and consultant teams which included reaching out to stakeholders, local businesses, and residents, thereby encouraging them to become project champions and to form part of the Community Advisory Committee (CAC). A combined total of 17 community outreach events were held for these plans between 2016 and 2019.

Additionally, these plans developed as web-based surveys in which the community had multiple opportunities to provide their input on each of the plans as they were being prepared. All of the outreach ensured that these plans were community driven planning documents that established a road map for City staff to know where the need was and what type of projects to pursue in the future.

In response to the project needs identified by the various planning documents, staff pursued grant funding from the ATP in 2018. In May 2019, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) notified the City of Santa Ana that the ATP projects were awarded the requested grant funding. Following the programming of grant funds, City staff began working on the design and additional community outreach efforts for the project. During the design phase for the project in 2021, a combined total of four additional community meetings were held. These outreach meetings focused on providing the history on how the projects were initially identified and on ensuring that the proposed project improvements were still in alignment with what the community wanted to see implemented by these projects. One of the major concerns with both project street corridors was regarding on-street parking. As a result of the parking assessment City Council 18 – 2 9/17/2024
Standard Avenue and McFadden Avenue Bikeways
September 17, 2024

Page 3 ends

and through creative engineering design, the project will be adding a total of 87 parking spaces along the corridors, 23 additional parking spaces on McFadden Avenue and 64 parking spaces on Standard Avenue.

As a finished product, this project will include protected bike lanes along McFadden Avenue from Harbor Boulevard to Grand Avenue, and Standard Avenue from Warner Avenue to 2nd Street. It also implements the City’s first fully-protected intersection at Standard Avenue and McFadden Avenue with separate traffic signal bicycle phasing and signal head indications. Pedestrian safety improvements along the corridors include high-visibility crosswalks and curb extensions at various cross streets. This project will serve the community by providing easier and safer connectivity to Downtown Santa Ana, Santa Ana College, the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, and the Orange County Civic Center. The project corridors run through historically underserved neighborhoods and the improvements will directly benefit a population in need of healthier ways to get around their community without relying on an automobile.

Additionally, this project will provide opportunities to engage in physical activity, promote a healthier lifestyle, provide a safe and low-stress pedestrian mobility option, decrease car trips and vehicle miles traveled, and improve air quality by reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Project completion requires the removal of asphalt, concrete, cold milling, concrete pad, curb and gutter, construction of concrete bike lanes, bus pads, and curb ramps, landscape and irrigation, traffic signal modification, signing, and striping. A contractor to complete this work was sought through a public bid.

A copy of construction plans, contracts, specifications, and all related reference materials (such as The Greenbook) are available for public review at the City’s Public Works Agency, Central Files office located at City Hall.

Public Outreach and Contractor Participation
To provide an opportunity for local vendors to submit bids, the City notified a total of 2,388 regional vendors via PlanetBids, many of which are Santa Ana based.

Furthermore, staff specifically reached out to Santa Ana vendors to encourage their participation in bids. A total of five bids were received. Zero bids were received from Santa Ana contractors.

As legally required, a Notice Inviting Bids was advertised in the Orange County Register newspaper on August 5, 2024 and August 12, 2024. The project was also advertised in PlanetBids from August 1, 2024 to August 15, 2024. Bids were received electronically via PlanetBids on August 15, 2024.

A bid protest was filed by Nationwide Contracting Services, Inc. during the protest period against Vido Samarzich, Inc. Following a thorough review, the City found the City Council 18 – 3 9/17/2024
Standard Avenue and McFadden Avenue Bikeways
September 17, 2024

Page 4 ends

protest to be invalid. Consequently, the City recommends awarding the project to Vido Samarzich, Inc. as the lowest responsive bidder.

Bid Results Summary
Rank Bidder’s Name Location Base Bid
Base Bid +
Alternate No.
1 1 Vido Samarzich, Inc. Rancho Cucamonga, CA $17,778,714 $19,170,060 2 Nationwide
Contracting Services,
Inc.

Huntington Beach, CA $18,010,780 $19,207,495
3 Granite Construction La Mirada, CA $18,487,558 $19,743,140 4 All American Asphalt Corona, CA $19,953,231 $21,049,001 5 Excel Paving
Company Long Beach, CA $20,194,273 $21,602,550
A total of five (5) bids were received and all were deemed responsive. Vido Samarzich, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive Base Bid and Alternate No. 1 in the amount of $19,170,060 (Exhibit 2). As specified in the bid documents, the lowest bid shall be determined on the basis of the Base Bid. Based on the bid analysis and a contractor’s reference check, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to Vido Samarzich, Inc. (Exhibit 3).

Project Delivery
To deliver a complete project, in addition to the construction contract, the estimated total project delivery includes construction administration, inspection, and testing.

Construction administration and inspection may be performed by either staff or consultants and includes construction management, inspection of the contractor’s work to ensure contract compliance, workmanship and quality, materials testing, and implementation of labor requirements.

Any allocated construction administration funds not spent are considered project savings and are returned to the respective fund balance upon close out of the project.

As indicated in the Cost Analysis (Exhibit 4) and as summarized in the table below, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $23,550,000.

City Council 18 – 4 9/17/2024
Standard Avenue and McFadden Avenue Bikeways
September 17, 2024

Page 5 ends

Project Item Total
Construction Contract Bid Amount $19,170,060
Construction Administration $1,305,355
Inspection $812,768
Testing $344,811
Project Contingencies $1,917,006
Total Estimated Construction Delivery Cost $23,550,000

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the recommended project actions are exempt from further review pursuant to Article 19, Categorical Exemptions Sections 15301(c) and 15304(h). Categorical Exemptions have been recorded with the Orange County Clerk-Recorder Department, as Environmental Review No. ER-2020-33 for the Standard Avenue Protected Bike Lane Project and Environmental Review No. ER-2020-97 for the McFadden Avenue Protected Bike Lane Project (Exhibit 5).

FISCAL IMPACT
As indicated in the Cost Analysis, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $23,550,000. There are $17,650,000 in existing funds available for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2024-25 from roadway projects 19-6923, 20-6962, 20-6965, 23-6705, 23-6706, & 23-6707. Additionally, $1,400,000 in funds from roadway projects 22-6989 and 24-6005 will be reallocated to project 20-6962.

With the approval of the requested appropriation adjustments, $2,000,000 of the accumulated fund balance in the Residential Street Improvement, Prior Year Carry Forward revenue account (05817002-50001) will be appropriated for spending in the Residential Street Improvement, Improvements Other Than Buildings expenditure account (05817660-66220). The spendable portion of the Residential Street Improvement fund balance is estimated to be $5,676,895 for Fiscal Year 2024-25, which is sufficient to allow for the recommended appropriation.

Additionally, $2,700,000 of the accumulated fund balance in the Transportation System Improvement Authorization Area B, Prior Year Carry Forward revenue account (99217002-50001) will be appropriated for spending in the Transportation System Improvement Authorization Area B, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (99217950-66220) (Exhibit 6). The spendable portion of the Transportation System Improvement Authorization Area B fund balance is estimated to be $8,527,939 for Fiscal Year 2024-25, which is sufficient to allow for the recommended appropriation.

Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be carried forward into Fiscal Year 2025-26. The funds will be budgeted and available for this item in the accounts below.

City Council 18 – 5 9/17/2024
Standard Avenue and McFadden Avenue Bikeways
September 17, 2024

Page 6 ends

Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit –
Account No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account
Description
Amount

EXISTING BUDGET
2024-
25 03217662-
66220
(19-6923)
Select Street
Construction
Measure M-Street
Construction,
Improvements Other
Than Buildings
$884,000
2024-
25 14817614-
66220
(20-6962)
Traffic System
Management
Grant
HUTA Gas Tax –
RMRA,
Improvements Other
Than Buildings
$5,875,000
2024-
25 14817614-
66220
(20-6965)
Traffic System
Management
Grant
Active Transportation
Program
Augmentation,
Improvements Other
Than Buildings
$5,444,000
2024-
25 05917665-
66220
(23-6705)
Select Street
Construction
HUTA Gas Tax –
RMRA,
Improvements Other
Than Buildings
$836,750
2024-
25 05917665-
66220
(23-6706)
Select Street
Construction
HUTA Gas Tax –
RMRA,
Improvements Other
Than Buildings
$2,510,250
2024-
25 05917665-
66220
(23-6707)
Select Street
Construction
HUTA Gas Tax –
RMRA,
Improvements Other
Than Buildings
$1,900,000

APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT
2024-
25 05817660-
66220
(20-6962)
Residential
Street
Improvement
Residential Street
Improvement,
Improvements Other
Than Buildings
$2,000,000
2024-
25 99217950-
66220
(20-6962)
Transportation
System
Improvement
Aut Area B
Transportation
System Improvement
Aut Area B Tustin,
Improvements Other
Than Buildings
$2,700,000

REALLOCATION
City Council 18 – 6 9/17/2024
Standard Avenue and McFadden Avenue Bikeways
September 17, 2024

Page 7 ends

Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit –
Account No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account
Description
Amount
2024-
25 01117660-
66220
(From 22-6989
to 20-6962)
General Fund
Pub Wks-Road
Maintenance,
Improvements Other
Than Buildings
$800,000
2024-
25 01117620-
66220
(From 24-6005
to 20-6962)
General Fund
PWTraffic/Transportation
Service
Enhancement,
Improvements Other
Than Buildings
$600,000
TOTAL $23,550,000

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Location Map

2. Bid Proposal

3. Construction Contract

4. Cost Analysis

5. Environmental Determination

6. Capital Improvement Project Worksheet
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council 18 – 7 9/17/2024
PWA

SANTA ANA
PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY Project No. 20-6965, 20-6962, 23-6707, 23-6705, 19-6923, 23-6706:

Standard Avenue and McFadden Avenue Bikeway Project
Location Map
Exhibit 1
EXHIBIT 1
City Council 18 – 8 9/17/2024
City Council 18 – 9 9/17/2024
City Council 18 – 10 9/17/2024
City Council 18 – 11 9/17/2024
City Council 18 – 12 9/17/2024
City Council 18 – 13 9/17/2024
Standard Avenue Bikeway Project
Concept Plan (1 of 5)
City Council 18 – 14 Plan Conceptual 9/17/2024
Standard Avenue Bikeway Project
Concept Plan (2 of 5)
City Council 18 – 15 Plan Conceptual 9/17/2024
Standard Avenue Bikeway Project
Concept Plan (3 of 5)
City Council 18 – 16 Plan Conceptual 9/17/2024
Standard Avenue Bikeway Project
Concept Plan (4 of 5)
City Council 18 – 17 Plan Conceptual 9/17/2024
Standard Avenue Bikeway Project
Concept Plan (5 of 5)
City Council 18 – 18 Plan Conceptual 9/17/2024

CITY OF SAN'TA ANA REBID

PROPOSAL
PRO.IECT NO. 20-6965, ATP 5063(196) - STANDARD AVE BIKEWAY FROM WARNER AVE TO 2ND S',r PROJECT NO. 20-6962, ATP 5063(198) MCFADDEN AVE BIKEWAY I'ROM I]ARBOR BT.VD TO GRAND AVE PROJECTNO. 23-6707 _ STANDARDAVE PAVEMENTREI{ABILII.A.TION IROM WARNERAVE TO 2ND SI PROJI'Ij'1 N0. 23-6705 - MCt'Al)l)liN AVI PAVi-lM F.N'l trF.tJAB[,Il A ftoN I-ROM HAI{BOR t]t.Vt) 10 ITATRVI.]W S I PROJECI'NO. 19.6923 _ MC}ADDEN AVE PAVEMENT REHABILITA'IION FROM TAIRVIEW ST TO RAITT ST . PROJECT NO. 23-6706 - MCFADDEN AVE PAVEMENT REHABILMATION FROM RAITT ST TO GRAND AI,IE

BID PROPOSAL
TO: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
FROM: Vido Samarzich, lnc.

REQUIREMENT:

The undersigned bidder declares that tliey have carefllly examined the location of the proposecl work, that they have exautinecl the Coniract Documents in its eutirety ancl hereby proposes to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with said plans (if anv) and the specifications for the unit price(s) or lump surn(s) ser forrh in the following schedule:

BASE BID:
20-6965, ATP s063(196) - STANDARD A\1E BIKEWAY FRON'I \,VARNER A\/E TO 2\r) ST 2O-6962, ATP 5063(19f]) - MCFADDEN AVE BIKEWAY FRONI HARBOR BLVD TO CRAND A\/E 19-6923 _ MCFADDEN AVE PA\/f,MENT REIIABILTTATION FROIII FAIRVIEW ST TO RAITT ST Item Description Qty thit Unit Price Amount

I STORM WATER POLLUTION
PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) .

RISK LEVEL 2
I LS $
600,000.00
$
600,000.00
2 T INCI,ASSIFI ED EXCAVATION,,. 6,1'73 CY :[
200.00
$
1,234,600.00
3 REMOVE EXISTING TREE 2 EA $
3,000.00
$
6,000.00
4 COLD PLANE EXISTING

ASPHALT CONCRETE
PAVEN4ENT (2" IVfAX)
299.410 SF $

0.66 $
197,610.60
5 CONSTRUCT ASPHALT

RUBBER HOT MIX (THICKNESS
PER PLAN)*
J)t') TON :[
200.00
S
842,400.00
6 CONSTRIJCT ASPHALT

C'ONCRETE PAVEMENI'X

1.1 00 TON $
240.00
$
744,000.00
7 CONSTRUCT AGGREGATE
BASE*
370 TON $
100.00
$
37,000.00
8 CONSTRUCT MOD]FIED

CONCRETE CURB AND
GI]TTER TYPE A-2-8 PER C S A.
sTD PLAN NO. I l0l WITH I'

GUTTER PLATE PAN

8.570 LF $

80.00 $
685,600.00
9 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB
AND GUTTER TYPE A-2-8 PER
C.S.A. STD PLAN NO. I ioi

2.450 LF $

80.00 S
196,000.00
P-l ofP-30
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 18 – 19 9/17/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA REBID

PROPOSAL
PR0.IECT N(). 20-6965. ATP 5063(196) STANDARD A\,T RIK[:\^/AY FRON4 W.ARN};R AVIr t O ZND Sj' PROJECT NO. 20-69(12, ATP 5063(l9tt) MCIr,\DDEN AVil lllKirW,\Y trlloM IL\RIIOR ULW) TO GI{AND AVE PROJECTNO. 23-670'7 STANDARD A\/E PAVLNIENT I{l,llAIllLU.A.l'l()N fl{OM WARNl,l{ AVil'l'O ?Nr) sl' PRO.IF.Cl NO.2.:t'67()5- MC["AI)l)tlN AVI': PAVtrl\,ltiN I Rl-llAllll.l lAlloN tit{OM HARltolt t.}t.VI) tI) l,AItt\/lt.,WSt PROJECT N0. l9-6923 MCITADDEN AVE PAVITMI':NI-RIliIABll-II'A]]ON IROM FAIRVIIIW 51'.to ltAlt-t Sl' PROJECI NO. 23-6706 - ]vICFADDIIN AVII PAVtllv{EN'I IUIFIAIIILITATION ItrROI\,I II-AII'T S-f "tO (it{ANtt AVli Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount
l0 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB
TYPE AI-6 PER CALTRANS
STD. PLAN AIITA
100 LF $

80.00 $
24,000.00
11 CONSTRL]CT CONCRETE CURB
AND GUTTER TYPE A-2-6 PER
C.S.A. STD PLANI NO. 1 i0l
| 324 T,F 5i

80.00 $
105,920.00
t2 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CT]RB
AND GUTTER TYPE A-2-(, PER
c.s.A. sTD PLAN NO. l1o1 (12"

GUTTER PAN)

9.400 LF $

80.00 $
752,000.00
l3 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB
AND CUTTER TYPE B-1
2,178 LF $

80.00 $
174,240.00
t4 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB
TYPE BI-6 PER CAI,TRANS STD
PLAN A87A
530 LF $

80.00 s
42,400.00
t5 STAMPED CONCRETE 6,500 SF $

30.00 S
195,000.00
16 RETAINING CURB 235 LF $

50.00 5i
1 1,750.00
t7 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE BUS
PAD PERC.S.A. STD PLAN NO.

I 108
11,r70 SF $

30.00 $
335,'100.00
l8 CONSTRUCT 6'' MONOLITHIC

PCC BIKE LANE PER DETAIL

WITH DOWELS
26,990 SF $

25.00 $
674,750.00
19 CONSTRUCT 8'' MONOLITH IC

PCC BIKE LANE OVER

COMPACTED SUBGRADE

WITH SCORE JOINTS AT IO'
INTERVAL. DOWELED AND

BONDED TO E,XISTING
S]DEWALK AND DRIVEWAY
APPROACH AT 24" INTERVALS
(t 260 SF $

40.00 s
250,400.00
20 CONSTRUCT 8'' MONOLITHIC
PCC BIKE LANE AND 8'' CT-IRB

OVER COMPACTED
SUBGRADE PER DETAIL "C''
ON SHEET DSO1 WITH SCORE

JOINTS AT IO' INTERVALS

3.250 SF $

45.00 $
146,250.00
21 CONSTRUCT CURB RAMPS
TYPES PER PLANS*
t0,t22 SF $

35.00 $
354,270.00
22 CONSTRUCT ALLEY APRON
PER C.S.A. STD PLAN 1I I I AND

DETAILS AS SHOWN ON
CONSTRUCTION DETA]L
SHEETS.
392 SF $

30.00 rj
11,760.00
P-2 of P-30 City Council 18 – 20 9/17/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA REBID

PROPOSAL
PRC).IECT N0. 20-6965. ATP 506.1(196) - S]'AN"DARD AVI': ljlKtj\ /AY I:ROM WAITNER AVI: t-O )Nr) slPROJECT N0. 20-69(,2, A]]'] 5063( 198) N{CITADDEN z\VIl }}IKF.WAY Irl{OM IIAIIIJOII L}I-VI ) 't1) GI{AND AVII PROJECT NO 23.6707 S'TANDAITD AVI, PAVI]MENT I{F,HABII TAII()N II{OM WARNEI{ AVF ]'0 ?N]) S1' PROJI'.Cl No 23-(170-5 MCITAI)l)[rN AVt] l'AVtiN4l'lNl Rl-.llAlill.l lAltoN l]ltoM IIARIJot{ t.}t.Vt) lol.AtR\/u,.WSt PROJECI'NO. 19-6923 MCFADDEN AVI: PAVLMIIN'| REIIABILI'IA t tON I.ROM FAIR\/il:w S f tO RAI I I St' PRO.IEC'I NO. 23-6706 IVICFADDITN AVE PAV}:.MI.N]'I{L:}IABILITATION FROM ItAII"t S'f t'O GRAND AVF.

Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount
23 CoNSTRUCT PCC N4EDIAN (4"
THICK)

1.700 SF $

20.00 $
34,000.00
24 CONSTRT]CT 4'' THICK
SIDEWALK PER C.S.A. S I't)
PLAN 1IO4*
28,l] t SF .$

15.00 $
421,965.00
25 CONSTRUCT CROSS GUTTER
PER C.S.A, STD PLAN I I0'

9.291 SF $

26.00 ii
241,566.00
26 CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY
APPROACH PER CASE I. PER
C.S.A. STD. PLAN i1i2 AND
DETAILS PER PLANS, (T:8")

4.'730 SF $

22.00 $
'104,060.00
27 DETECTABLE WARNING
SURT'ACE PER C.S.A. STD PLAN
il22
780 SF $

40.00 $
31,200.00
28 INSTALL 6" PVC PIPES
(LOCATTON PER PLAN)
1,340 LF $
100.00
$
134,000.00
2<) REMOVE EXISTING CATCI{
BASIN AND CONFLICTING P]PE
2 EA ,i)
7,500.00
$
15,000.00
30 FALSE CURB (JVIAPLE ST AND

MCFADDEN AVE)
I EA $
6,000.00
S
6,000.00
3l CONSTRUCT JUNCTION
STRUCTURE _ PIPE TO PIPE
(CASE 1) PER SPPWC 332-2
2 EA $
s,500.00
$
11,000.00
32 CONSTRUCT JUNCTION
STRT]CTTIRE _ PIPE TO PIPE
(CASE 2) PER SPPWC 1.12-2
1 EA $
5,500.00
.$
5,500.00
-1 -1 CONSTRUCT JLNCTION

STRUCTURE - PIPE TO RCB
PER SPPWC 33.1-2
2 EA $
7,000.00
$
14,000.00
34 CONSTRUCT CURB OPENING

CATC BASIN WITH
GRATING(S) PER SPPWC 302-3
(ONE GRATE)
I EA $
15,000.00
$
15,000.00
35 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN
TYPE ''B" PER C.S.A. STD PLAN
NO.302 (W:t2')
I EA $
19,000.00
$
19,000.00
36 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN
TYPE "B" PER C.S.A. STD PLAN
NO.302 (W:7')
I EA $
'15,000.00
:i,
15,000.00
37 CONSTRUCT CATCI{ BASIN
TYPE ''C'' PER C.S.A STD PLAN
NO.303 (W:5',)
1 EA s
13,000.00
$
13,000.00
38 CONSTRLICT CATCH BASIN ,I'YPE ''B' PER C.S.A. PLAN STD.

PLAN 302. (W:21)
I EA $
23,000.00
$;
23,000.00
P-3 of P-30 City Council 18 – 21 9/17/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA REBID

PROPOSAL
PRC).IECT NO. 20-6965. AIIr 5063( 196) SI'ANDARD AVI BIKEWAY I,ROM W-AIINER AVL t-() )ND sl' PROJECT N0. 20-69(t2, A'i} 5063( 198) MCITADDEN AVE BIKL.WAY I,ROM IL\I{IJOI{ IILVD lI) GITAND AVL PROJECT NO. 23'670'1 -' STANDAITD AVt PAVFIVIIINT I{rIIAI]]LI]'.41X)N IrROM WAI{Nl:l{ AV| l'O ?Ni) ql' PRO.IF.C l No. 23-(17{)5 - MClrAI)l)llN AVl-: PAV}ri\4I-lN l R l:l lA lJll l t A t toN };RON4 nAR tjott t.}t.Vt) l() l,n tR\/ t}rw S l PROJECI-NO. l9-6923 MCITADI)EN AVts PAVliMl:NT RIrllAIlli.l'IA fl()N f ROM i:AlR\/tEW S f TO I{AIf t'S f PRO.IEC'I N(). 23-6706 " lvlCFADDIlN AVE PAVITMI:NT l{1]l1ABII-[IA'|ION I.ROM ITAITT St 'tO (itlAND AVll Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount
39 CONSTRUCT CATCH BASIN
TYPE "C" PER C.S.A STD PLAN
NO.303 (W:4)
I EA $
'13,000.00
$
13,000.00
40 CATCH BASIN INLET

RECONSTRUCTION (TOP SLAB
ONLY)
I EA $i
11,000.00
$
11,000.00
41 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE
JLINCTION CI.IAMBER TYPE "R"
PER C.S.A. STD PLAN 308
I EA $
24,000.00
S
24,000.00
42 CONSTRUCT MANHOLE
JUNCTION CHAMBER TYPE "C"
PER C.S.A. STD PLAN 308
I EA (l
24,000.00
$
24,000.00
43 CONSTRUCT 6" CLEAN OUT I EA $
4,000.00
$
4,000.00
44 INSTALL lrJ" RCP (D LOAD PER

PLAN) AND BEDDING DETAILS
PER C.S.A. STD. PLAN I I50
140 LF $;
800.00
$
1 12,000.00
45 INSTALL 24" RCP (D LOAD PER

PLAN) AND BEDDING DETAILS
PER C.S.A. STD. PLAN I I50
l4 LF $
1,000.00
$
14,000.00
46 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE
COLLAR (D=24") FOR RCP PER
C.S.A, STD. PLAN 320
I EA $
3,000.00
$
3,000.00
47 STANDARD AVE - PILTERRA
I8'X 8'SYSTEM
I EA $
160,000.00
$
160,000.00
48 MCFADDEN AVE - FILTERRA
20'X 5'SYSTEM
I EA $
130,000.00
s
130,000.00
49 N,ICFADDEN AVE - CONCRETE
I\,IODULAR WETLANDS BMP
SYSTEM (MWS-L-4-8-3'-2"-CLTG)
I EA $
95,000.00
S
95,000,00
50 MCFADDEN AVE - CONTECH

CONNECTOR PIPE SCREEN
-) EA $
5,000.00
$
15,000.00
5l MCFADDEN AVE - CONTECH
FULL CAPTURE F]LTER WITH
TROUGH SYSTEM (BIO-CURBFULI--24)
I EA $
9,000.00
S
9,000.00
52 CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK

UNDERDRAIN
2 EA $
10,000.00
S
20,000.00
53 MODIFIED PARKWAY

CULVERT
I EA .$
25,000.00
$
25,000.00
54 ADJUST WATER VALVE

FRAME AND C'OVER TO FINISH
GRADE PER C.S.A. STD PLAN
l4t0
il3 F,A $
1,500.00
$
169,500.00
P-4 of P-30 City Council 18 – 22 9/17/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA REBID

PROPOSAL
I'RoJECT N(). 20-6965. A'IP 5063(196) - STANDARD n VL TJIKI-WAY i.l{OM WAItNtrtt AV[-j t-() ,Nr) sj' PRO.IECT NO. 20-6962, A1'P 5063( 198) MCI],\DDITN z\\/E IIIKF.WAY ]:ROM II,\RBOR BL\D 1'() GRAND AVtj PROJECT NO. 2.3-6'107 STANDAITD AV!. PAVEN,ILNI'I{LIIAIIILI'tAllON I]ROM WARNIII{ AVI] 'fo ,ND 51' PRO.Il'lcl NO 23-6705 MCIfAI)l)lrNAVI'.PAVtTMHNIRl:l1A[.tll.l IAIION]ltOM ItAttljOlillt.Vt) tI)t-AlRVlrwSI PI{OJECI NO. 19-692-1 - MCIADI)IIN AVII PAVI:;MINT RIIIARILIIAII()N FROM liAtRVItW S I' IO RAI I t Sl PR0.]ECT NO. 23-(1706 - Iv{CFADDbIN AVl.l PAVF.MLINT IU1}IAIJILITATION FRON,I I{AITT ST TO GRAND AVtr.

Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount
55 ADJUST GROUNDWATER
I\4ONITORING WELL COVER

TO FINISH GRADE
6 EA $
1,300.00
$
7,800.00
56 ADJLIST SEWER CLEANOUT

FRAME AND COVER TO
FINISHED GRADE PER C.S.A.

STD PLAN I2O4
I EA $
1,500.00
$
1,500.00
57 ADJUST SEWER MANHOLE

FRAME AND GRATE TO FINISH
GRADE PER C.S.z\. STD PLAN
t 20l
f) EA .$
1,300.00
$
41,600.00
58 ADJUST STORM DRAIN

MANHOLE FRAME AND

GRATE TO FINISH GRADE PER
C.S.A STD PLAN I2OI
l3 EA $
1,300.00
$
16,900.00
-s9 RELOCATE I.'IRE H Y T]RAN-T

AND ASSEMBLY
EA $
20,000.00
S
60,000.00
(r0 REMOVE FIRE IIYDRANT AND
ASSEMBLY TO 3-FT BELOW
GRADE
2 EA d,
,D
4,000.00
.$
8,000.00
61 ADJUST WATER METER TO
FINISHED GRADE PER C.S.A.

STD PLAN I40I
-1 EA .$
700.00
S
2,100.00
62 ADJUST TRAFFIC PULLBOX TO

FINISHED GRADE
8 EA $
560.00
$
4,480.00
63 FURNISH AND INSTALL NEW

WATER VALVE FRAME AND

COVER TO FINISHED GRADE,
l() EA $
'1,700.00
$
27,200.00
64 REMOVE EXISTING CHAIN

LINK FENCE
140 LF $

45.00 1,
6,300.00
65 INSTALL 6'CHAIN LINK
FENCE PER SPPWC STD. PLAN
600-4
14() LF $

65.00 $
9,'100.00
66 REMOVE AND INSTALL

STREET LICIIT WITI,I CONDUIT
AND PULLBOX PER C.S.A, STD
PLAN I126H
I EA s
1 1,760.00
$
11,760.00
67 REMOVE CONFLICT LITII-ITY

SERVICE LINE
lt EA $
2,000.00
$
22,000.00
68 INSTALL I'' COPPER WATER

SERVICE WJTH I'' METERPER
c.s.A. sTD. "O* 1+r)1.

LOCATION PER LANDSCAPE
PLAN
4 EA $
10,000.00
,$
40,000.00
69 SIGNING AND STRIPING I LS $
1,400,000.00
.$
1,400,000.00
P-5 of P-30 City Council 18 – 23 9/17/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA REBID

PROPOSAL
PRC).IECT N(). 20-6965. ATP 5063(196) - STANDARD AVE BIKEw.^y FRI]M W.AIiNLR AV[: l o 2Nr) s]' PROJECT NO. 20-6962, ATP 5063(198) MCI',A.DDEN AVtr IIIKLWAY I]ROM IINUIOR BI-VD 1'() GRAND AVI PROJECT NO. 23-6701 STAIJDARD AVII PAVFI\,{I:N'I I{EILAIIILI]'.{TI()N rI{oM WAII.NUI{ AVI: T'O 2r\D S I PR( ).'l'lc I NO. 2.1-(r7()5 MCliAl)l)liN AVI', PAVtlM IIN I ltlrl lA llll l I A I ION l:ROI\4 IIAR BOt{ lil.Vt) tI) lfA lltVil:W S I PROJECT NO. 19-6923 - MCIADDEN AVE PAVI:;MI'INI REilAllll.[IA'llON FII0M I.A]R\/IL.W S f TO I{An l' S I PR0.IECT No. 23-6706 lvfcFADDltN AVE PAVEMI:N] turt.tA}ilt-ffA'floN ]]ltotvt ItAIT"f s'I't-o GRANI) AVI:

Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount
70 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MODIFICAT]ON . STANDARD

AVE & WARNER AVE
I LS $
72,000.00
$
72,000.00
7t TRAFFIC SIGNAL

MODIFICATION - STANDARD
AVE & ST. GERTRUDE PLACE
I LS $
83,500.00
$
83,500.00
72 TRAFFIC SIGNAL

MODIFICATION - STANDARD

AVE & EDINGER AVE
I LS $
327,100.00
$
327,100.00

TRAFFTC SIGNAL

MODIFICATION - STANDARD

AVE & IIOBART STREET
I LS $
1 10,000.00
$
1 10,000.00
74 TRAFFIC SIGNAL

MODIFICATION - STANDARD
AVE & McFADDEN AVE
I LS $
387,000.00
$
387,000.00
75 PEDESTRIAN HYBRID BEACON

INSTALLATION - STANDARD

AVE AND WAKEHAM AVE
I LS S
259,000.00
$
259,000.00
76 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
INSTALLAT]ON . STANDARD

AVE & BISHOP STREET
I LS $
362,000.00
S
362,000.00
77 TRAFFIC SIGNAL

MODIFICATION - STANDARD

AVE & CHESTNUT AVE
I LS $
81,000.00
.$
81,000.00
78 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
I\4ODIFICATION - STANDARD

AVE & FIRST STREET
I LS $
22,000.00
s
22,000.00
79 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
I\,{ODIFICAT]ON _ N4CFADDEN

AVE & HARBOR BLVD
I LS li
103,000.00
,$
103,000.00
80 TRMFIC SIGNAL
MOD]FICATION - IvTCFADDEN

AVB & RIVERVIEW MARKEI
PLACE
I LS $
93,000.00
$
93,000.00
8l TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MODIFICATION _ MCFADDEN

AVE & JACKSON STREET
I LS .$
72,500.00
$
72,500.00
82 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MODIFICATION _ MCFADDEN

AVE & MOHAWK DRIVE
I LS $
79,000.00
s
79,000.00
83 TRAFFIC SIGNAL

MODIFICATION MCFADDEN

AVE & FAIRVIEW STREET
I LS $i
86,500.00
S
86,500.00
84 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MODIFICATION _ MCFADDEN

AVE & SULLIVAN STREET
I LS $
80,000.00
$
80,000.00
85 ]'RAF'FII] SIGNAL
MODIFICATION _ ]\4CFADDEN

AVE & CENTER STREET
I LS $'
83,000.00
$
83,000,00
City Council P-6 of P-30 18 – 24 9/17/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA REBID

PROPOSAL
PRC).IECT NO. 20-6965. ATP ,s063( 196) - sTAj\iDARD At,T BIKLTu/AY I,RoM WAI{NLR AVF To )N-D s'1' PROJECT NO. 20-69(12, ATP 5063( 198) I\'{CI"'ADDEN AVIrr I}IKEWAY IrROM H,\IUtOit Ili-W) I ( ) GITAND A\/ll PROJECT NO. 23-670']- S'|ANDAI{D AVE PAVIllvtl.N'f Rir}IAlllL[.^.11()N irRoM wAttNtr.t{ AVI] T'O r*,, t'r' PR0JI',Cl No.23-(1705 M(ll'AI)l)l1N AVI', PAVliMllN I [tl llAl]tt ttA,loN lil{oM ItARB()tt BLVI) Ir) l-'AIl{vilrw s I PRO.IECT NO. I9-6923 MCI.ADDEN AVL PAVI,MENI REI{A].}IL[IA'I'I()N I--[{OM ]]AII{VIITW S f TO RAII']' ST PROJECI N0. 23-6706 - lvlCFADDl:.N r\VE PAVtiMi:.N f 1UrllAIllLITA'ftON tjRONI I{AIIT'ST'TO GttANt) AVII Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount
86 TRAIFIC SIGNAL
MODIFICATION _ MCFADDEN

AVE & RAITT STREET
I LS $
103,000.00
$
103,000.00
87 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MODIFICATION _ I\4CFADDEN
AVE & PAC]PIC AVE
I LS $;
65,000.00
S
65,000.00
88 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MODIFICATION _ N4CFADDEN

AVE & BRISTOL STRTET
I LS $
26,500.00
S
26,500.00
89 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MODIFICATION _ ]\,ICFADDEN
AVE & SI{ELTON STREET
I LS $
291,000.00
$
291,000.00
90 TRAf'FIC SIGNAL
MODIFICATION _ \4CFADDEN

AVE & FLOWER STREET
1 LS $
15,000.00
5i
15,000.00
9l TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MODIFICATION _ MCFADDEN

AVE & BROADWAY STREET
I LS $
'147,000.00
I'
147,000.00
92 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MOD] FICATION _ MCFADDEN

AVE & MAIN STREET
I LS $
76,500.00
$
76,500.00
93 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MODIFIC]A]'ION * N4CFADDEN

AVE & ORANGE AVE
I LS $
174,000.00
$
174,000.00
94 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
I\4ODIFICATION _ MCFADDEN

AVE & MAPLE STREET
I LS $
127,500.00
$
127,500.00
95 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MODIFICATION - N4CFADDEN

AVE & HATHAWAY STREET
I LS $
77,000.00
$
77,000.00
96 TRAFFIC SIGNAL
MODIFICATION - I\4CFADDEN

AVB & GRAND AVE
I LS $
78,500.00
$
78,500.00
97 MODIFYING RRFB SYSTEM
(oAK ST MTDBLOCK

CROSSING)
I LS $
4,200.00
$
4,200.00
98 FURNISH AND INSTALL

TRAFFIC LOOPS
/l EA $
590.00
S
43,070.00
99 INSTALL NO.6 PULLBOX t64 EA $
1,050.00
s
172,200.00
100 INSTALLNO.6E PULLBOX 22 EA $
1,300.00
$
28,600.00
10r INSTALL 3'' PVC CONDUIT 9.530 LF $

98.50 S
938,705.00
102 INSTALL 4" PVC CONDUIT 1,7 t7 LF
186.00
$
319,362.00
City Council P-7 of P-30 18 – 25 9/17/2024
CITY OF"SANTA ANA

PROPOSAL
REBID
ADDENDUM NO.

PROJECT N0. 20-6965, ATP 5063(196) - IiI'ANDARD AVE BIKEWAY lrt{oM WAI{NEII AVD'tO 2ND ST PROJECT NO. 20.6962, A'TP 5063( I98)- MCFADDEN AVE BIKEWAY FITOM I.IAI{I]OI{ BLVD TO GMND AVI.] PROJECT N0. 23'6707 - STANDARD AVE PAVEMENT REI-IABII-lTA'rlON FROtvt WARNER AVE.t'O 2ND St. PROJEC'r NO. 23-6705 - fi'ICFADDEN AVE PAVEIVIENI'REI-IABII.I'|A'I]ON FROM HATUJOR IILVD.IO FAIRVIE\,v ST PROJECT NO. 19.6923 - MCFADDEN AVE PAVEMENT REI{ABILII'ATION I]ITOM ITAIRVIEW ST 'TO RATTT ST PROJECT NO 23-6706 - N'ICFADDEN AVE PAVEMEN'I RIHABILITA]]ON I:ROI\4 I{AI rT ST T'O GRAND AVE Itern Description Qtl' Unit Unit f'rice Arnount
r03 INSI'AI,T, I P C]OJVIM tJNI CATION
SYSTEI\,{S
I t., si s
102,000.00
$
'102,000.00
r04 INSTi\t,|. 120 STITAND SICNAIMODE FIBER oP',UC (SN4FO) CABLE

2.142 LF $

3.40 $
7,282.80
I05 INSTAI,I, I2 STRAND SICNAL
MODE FTBER OPl'tC (Stvltro)
CABLE
2,280 I-F' $

5.60 $
12,768.00
r06 INSTALL 24 S]'RAND SIGNAT,
MODE FrBER OPTrC) (St\{}'O)
CABI.E
20,000 LT s

2.25 $
45,000.00
107 r{JSION SPI,ICE I STRAND Ort
SINGI-E NiIODE t?tBttR Op't'tC
(sMFO)
36 F]A $
358.00
$
12,888.00
r08 INSTAt,I. FIt]IIR OPTIC] SPLICE

CI,,OSURE
22 EA $
4,500.00
$
99,000.00
109 POTI.IOLD TRAI-FIC] SICNAI,
POLE LOC.]A'I.ION FOR U]'ILII'Y

CONFLICT
72 EA $
1,680.00
s
120,960,00
I l0 RAILI{OAD: IJPI{R PERIvfl -f
1 I,S $
60,000.00
$
60,000.00
lil RAILROAD: UPRR FLAGCINC 30** DAY $ r,500 $45,000
112 LANDSCAPI] I LS $
300,000.00
$
300,000.00
ll3 IT{RIGATION I t,S $
650,000.00
S
650,000.00
114 I2O.D,,\Y PLANT

ESTABI-ISHMENI'
I LS $
10,000.00
$
10,000.00
I 15 CONSTRUCT'ION PERI\,IIT I t,S $42.3 r9 s42,-r r9
ll6 PROJECT ADVERTISEMENT
SICN
.) EA a
2,000.00
$
6,000.00
n7 CONSTRUC]' II" GATE VAI-VE
PER C.S.A. STD PI.,AN NO. I4I().

REPLACE 25'WATER MAIN
BETWEEN OI.D AND NEW
VALVE L,OCA]'ION WITI.I PVC
PIPTJ. CONNEC'T TO EXISI"ING
PIPE PER C.S.A STD I,LI\N NO.

I 409
I LS $
35,000.00
S
35,000.00
I l8 CONSTRUCT I2" CATE VALVE
C.S,A. ST'D PLAN NO. 14I0.

REPLACE 5O'WAT'ER MATN
I]ETWEEN OLD AND NEW
I LS S
45,000.00
s
45,000.00
P-8 o{'P-30
City Council 18 – 26 9/17/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA REBID

PROPOSAL
PR0.IEC1 N(). 20-6965. ATP 5063( 196) - STANDARD AVh lllKIlWAY i:ROM WAI{NII{ AVL. l'O 2ND S l PROJECT NO. 20-6962, ATP 50(13(198) MCITADDEN AVE IliKI:WAY |IIOM IIAIUJOI{ UI-VI) I'o GIIA.ND AVI:

PROJECTNO. 13-610'1 STAiVDARDAVE PAV}IN{F.NTI{lrll.ABIl.ll'All()N IrROtr{ WARNIII{AV| TO?Ni) qf PRO.ll'lcl NO. 23-(1705 MCIfAI)l)l1N AVI-. PAVtrMt'N I tttrllAlJlt ttA ttoN FRoM Hn RtJoR Ut.Vl) lo t-AtRVu,.w S I PROJECT NO 19-6923 ' MCFADDEN AVII PAVI:;MIjNI' REIIABILII'A'IION I]ROM l:AIIt\/lLtW S f T1) IIAI l l S f PRO.IEC'I NO. 23-Cr706 - IV{CFADDI]N AVti PAVEMLNT ltllllAllll-lTATrcN FROM IIAITT S1 TO GIL,\NI) AVll ADD ALTERNATE NO. I
23-6707 STANDARD AVE. PAYEMENT REHABILITATION FROI\I WiIRNER AVE. TO 2ND ST.

Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount
VALVE LOCATION WITI{ PVC
PIPE. CONNECT TO EXISTING
PIPE PER C.S.A STD PLAN NO.

I 409
l19 ABANDON EXISTING GATE
VALVE. REN{OVE VALVE BOX
FRAME AND COVER. CUT OFF
RISER 18'' BELOW GRADE.

BACKFILL WITH SAND.

COMPACT AND REPAVE
I LS $
3,500.00
s;
3,500.00
120 REMOVE AND DiSPOSE

EXISTING GATE VALVE
l LS $;
9,000.00
$
9,000.00
t2l CONSTRUCT 6" ROLLED CURB
PER DETAIL ON SHEET DD-26
64 LF $
120.00
$
7,680.00
TOTAL BASE BID $ n,anlrc.qo
Item Description Qty tlnit flnit Price Amount

I COLD PLANE EXISTTNG

ASPHALT CONCRETE
PAVEI\{ENT (2' MAX)
407 "400 SF $

0.70 $
285,180.00
2 CONSTRUCT ASPHALT

RUBBER HOT MIX (TFIICKNESS
PER PLAN)*

5.610 TON $
215.00
S
1 ,206,1 50.00
3 ADJUST \A/ATER VALVE

FRAME AND COVER TO FINISH
GRADE PER C.S.A. STD PLAN
l4l0
25 EA $
1,650.00
S
41,250.00
4 ADJUST SEWER MANHOLE

FRAME AND GRATE TO FINISH
GRADE PER C.S.A. STD PLAN
t201
34 EA $
1,430.00
$
48,620.00
5 ADJUST SURVEY IV1ONUMENT

FRAME AND COVER TO
FINISHED GRADE PER C.S.A

STD PLAN IIIT
-1 EA $
2,000.00
$
6,000.00
6 SIGNING AND STRIPING I LS li
500,000.00
$
500,000.00
City Council P-9 of P-30 18 – 27 9/17/2024
CITY OF SANTA ANA REB!D

PROPOSAL
PRO.IECT NO. 20-6965. ATP 5063( 196 ) STANDARD AVi, itIKIr\ rAY iltOM WAI{NI]R AV[: t-0 )NI) s I PRO.TECT NO. 20-69(12, ATP 5063( 198) MCITAI)DIN A\[, l]tKF.wAY fRoM IIARBOI{ Bi-W) t'() GI{.\ND AVL PROJECT NO. 23-670'7 S'tANDARD A\/ll PAVIII\,{hNT I{ir.f l.,\llllrfA1l()N fRoM WAIiNF.J{ AVIr t'O ,Nr., SI' PROJI'.C'l N(). 23-(1705 - MCITAI)l)l:N AVl, PAVtrl\4llN I l(irliAIill l IA I ION I:ROM ilARtJ()tt I.it.VI) tI) l-AIRvn.w S I PI{OJECI'NO. 19-6923 MCFADDEN AVE PAVI:lMliNl- REIlAllll.rrAllC)N FROM l:AtRvit,w S l' [O Itnl t't' 51' PRO.IECT NO. 23-6706 - NICFADDIIn',,\VE PAVITMENTIUrIIAI]II-ITATION FROM I{AIT'I'ST t-(l CRANT) AVli ADD ALTERNATE NO. 2
23-6705 MCF'ADDEN AVf,. PAVE]VTENT REHABILITATION FROI\,I HARBOR BLVD TO FAIRVIEW ST.

Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount
7 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT I LS s rs,000 $ 15,(xx)
8 PROJECT ADVERTISEMENT
SIGN
I EA $
2,200.00
$
2,200.00
TOTAL ADD ALTERNATE NO. I BID $ z, r o+,+oo.oo
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount
I UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION* 480 CY $
181.50
$
87,120.00
2 COLD PLANE EXISTING

ASPHALT CONCRETE
PAVEI\4ENT (2'lv{AX)
141,700 SF $

0.78 $
1 10,526.00
3 COLD PLANE EXISTING

ASPHALT CONCRETE
PA\.EMENT (> 2")
67,600 SF $

2.20 $
148,720.00
4 CONSTRUCT ASPHALT

RUBBER HOT MIX (THICKNESS
PER PLAN)*

2.800 TON $
210.00
s
588,000.00
5 CONSTRUCT ASPHALT
CONCRETE PAVEMENT*

1.,s40 TON $
240.00
$
369,600.00
6 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB
AND GUTTER TYPE A-2-8 PER
C.S.A. STD PLAN NO. 1 IOl

2.00 LF $

77.0A
$
15,400.00
7 CONSTRT]CT CONCRETE BUS
PAD PER C.S.A. STD PLAN NO.

I IOn
9(X) SF $

27.50 $,
24,750.00
8 CONSTRUCT 4'' THICK
SIDEWALK PER C.S.A. STD
PLAN I1O4
800 SF $

16.50 $
'13,200.00
9 ADJUST SEWER MANHOLE

FRAME AND GRATE TO FINISH
GRADE PER C.S-A. STD PLAN
r 201
4 EA $
1,430.00
$
5,720.00
t0 FURNISH AND INSTALL NEW

WATER VALVE FRAME AND

COVER TO FINISHED GRADE
l5 EA $
1,870.00
$
28,050.00
City Council P- l0 of P-30 18 – 28 9/17/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA

PROPOSAL
REBID

ADDENDUM NO,
PRO.IECI NO. 20-69(15, ATP 5063( 196) S]'ANDARD AVE IIIKEWAY I:ROM \\TARNI:.R AVL t-o 2ND s I PROJEC]No. 20-6962, ATP 5063(l9t'i) MCFADD}IN AVL IIIKL\VAY FITOM IIAIiBOR III-VI) 1O (;ltAND AVL PROJEC'I'NO. 23-()707 S IANDARD AVE PAVI-lMl:.N'l RIrHAtl[-ffA I IoN FI{ot\,I wAttNI;t{ AVF] l'O ,Nr) \T PROJECT N0. 23-6705 - MCFADDEN AVE PAVEMIINT RIIIIABILITAII()N FitOI\4 IIARIiOR BLVD Ir) I,AIRVTTTW ST' PROJECI'NO. 19.6927 - MCTTADDEN AVE PAVI-,MENTREI]ABII-TI'A'TI()N FROM IJAIRVILW SI' I0 IiAI I-I'S f PRO.IECT NO. 23-67()6 - MCFADDEN AV[: PAVF]IVF]NT I{LIIABII-I'IA flON IrR.oM RAI'fl ST I() GRn ND AVII AI)D ALTERNATE NO.3
23-6706 MCFADDEN AVE. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FRON{ RAITT ST. TO GRAND AVE.

Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount
1l SIGNING AND STRIPING i I,S $
300,000.00
$
300,000.00
t2 F-URNISH AND INSIALI.

TRAFI.'IC I-oOPS
) EA $
1,563.00
$
3,126.00
l3 INS'I'AI-L NO. 6 PT]LLBOX I EA $
1,136.00
$
1,136.00
t4 CONSTRT]CTION PEITMIT I I-S $ 10.000 $ r0,000
15 PROJIICT ADVERTI SIIMEN'l
SIGN
I EA $
2,200.00
S
2,200.00
TOTAL ADD ALTERNATE NO. 2 BID $ t,zoz,s+a.oo
Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount
I UNCLAS SI FIT]D TJXCAVA'I'ION ,. 3,1 60 C'Y $
181.50
c
573,540.00
2 CO[,D PLANI] F,XISI-IN G
ASPI]AI,T C]ONCREI'[:

PAVEMENT (2', MAX)
445,300 sF' $

0.65 $
289,445.00
., COLD PI-ANE EXISl'ING
ASPHAI-I CONCRI:'IL
PAVITMEN'f (> 2")
19,900 SF $

2.45 "\
48,755.00
4 CONSTRIICT ASPIIALT
RUBBITR HOT MrX (I'HTCKNESS
PER PI-AN)*
7,000 foN si
210.00
S
1,470,000.00
5 CONSTRUC'f ASPIIAI-T
CONCREI'I1 PAVEMIIN I*
5,060 foN $
240.00
$
1,214,400.00
6 CONSTRI]C1' CONCItIi IE ClIRB
AND C}IITI'I]R ]'YPE A-2-8 PER
C-S.A. STD PI,AN NO l IOI
200 I-F $

77.00 li
15,400.00
7 CONSTRIIC'I CONCRlil lI Ctjl{ll
AND GUTII:rI{ TYPE B-l
100 I,I $

77.00 $
7,700.00
8 CONS T-ITTJC]T CONCRETI] I]T]S
PAD PER C.S.A. STD PLAN NO.

I 108

4.000 SF ,$

27.50 $
1 10,000.00
City Council P-l I ofP-30 18 – 29 9/17/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA REBID

PROPOSAL
PR()JECTN0. 20-6965. A]'P 5063(196)- STANDAI{D A\rE ItlKIr\\IAy }:ROM wAI{NLI{ AVI- lO 2Nr) ql PRO.IECTNO 20-(19(,2,At?5063(t98) N'{CITADDENAVIIliKi:W,\Y}jROMIIAIIIIORBI-VI)ToGITANDAVE PROJLICTNO. 23-6707 S'|ANDAIU A\/ii PAVFMF.N'I ItLlLAIlll-ffAll()N FI{OM WARNI:I{ AVE T'O )N ) (l' PROJI-.CI N().23-6705-MCll'Al)l)lrNAVI-.PAVITMLNII{FlIAUII IIAIloNI-t{()N4TJARB()t{BLVt)lI)l-AIt{VltlWSI PI{OJECI-NO. l9-6923 MCITADDEN AVE PAVIIMI';N]' REIli\lllLI fA ll()N l'ItOM [rAlt{VII:]W S f l() I{AI t-t 51 PROJEC'I N(). 23-6706 - Iv{CFADDIIN i\VE PA\zl:Ml::N I I{L:IIAIJII-IIAION I.ROI\{ ITAII T ST T-o GRAND AVii Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount
9 CONSTRUCT 4'' THICK
SIDEWALK PER C.S.A. STD
PLAN I1O4

3.1 00 SF $

16.50 $
51,150.00
l0 CONSTRL]CT CROSS GUTTER
PER C.S.A. STD PLAN 1109
165 SF $

29.00 s
4,785.00
11 CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY

APPROACH PER CASE I, PER
C.S.A. STD. PLAN I II2 AND
DETAILS PER PLANS. (T=8")
1, t00 SF $

24.50 $
26,950.00
t2 ADJUST WATER VALVE

FRAME AND COVER TO FINISH
GRADE PER C.S.A. STD PLAN
t4l0
(t5 EA $
1,650.00
$
107,250.00
l3 ADJUST SEWER MANHOLE

FRAME AND GRATE TO FINISH
GRADE PER C.S.A. STD PLAN
l20l
55 EA .$
1,430,00
s
78,650.00
t4 ADJUST SURVEY NIONUMENT

FRAME AND COVER TO
FINISHED GRADE PER C.S.A.

STDPLAN IIIT
6 EA $
2,000.00
.$
12,000.00
15 ADJUST WATER METER TO
FINISHED GRADE PER C.S.A.

STD PLAN I4O]
7 EA $
770.00
s
5,390.00
t6 ADJUST TRAFFIC PULLBOX TO

FINISHED CRADE
1 EA $
1,830.00
$
1,830.00
t7 SIGNING AND STRIPING I LS $
500,000.00
S
500,000.00
1ti FURNISH AND INSTALL

TRAFFIC LOOPS
5 EA $
900.00
$
900.00
l9 CONSTRUCI'ION PERMIT I LS $' 15,0()0 { I5 (}Oo
20 PROJECT ADVERTISEMENT
SICN
I EA $
2,200.00
S
2,200.00
City Council P-12 of P-30 18 – 30 9/17/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA

PROPOSAL
REBID
PRC)JECT NO. 20-6965. A'tP 5063( 196) -- ST^NDARD AVti IJIKI;]WAY I;ltoM WAI{N[.I{ AVli l-o )Nn s't PROJECT N0 20-6962, A1 P 5063(198) MCITADDEN A\4i IIIKL.WAY ll{OM IIAIIBOR Ilt-U) 1'o GIiAND A\/L:

PROJECT NO, 23-6707 S'|ANDAI{D A\1E PAV]]IUF.NI'I{LIIAI]ILI f,A.]'ION I]I].OM WARNEI{ AVJ' To 'N) (I'
PROiI-.ClNO.23-(1705-ML'lrAI)l)liNAVI-, l'AVtlMF.Nlt{FllAlJllttAiloNl-t{OMIIARI.}Ol{lil.Vt)tot-AIRVillWSI PROJECI' N(). 19-692.3 MCI-ADDEN AVII I'AVI:;Ml:lNl llEIIAllll.[tAllON I]ROlvI liAlR\/tLlW S f IO RAI I t S I PRO.IEC I NO. 23-67{)6 - NICFADDEiT* AVE PAVEMII.N I IUII IABILITA'fION lrROIvt ITAIT' I St- .to GITANI) AVti TOTAL BASE BID + ADD ALTERNATES NO. 1. NO. 2. NO. 3 I S zo,rog,oog.+o The lowest responsible bidder shall be selected basecl on the total base bicl. The Citv reserves the right to award the Base Bid, ancl any, all, or l1one of the acld-alternate bicl iterns (if anv). * The quantity for this bid itern is shown fbr bid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the"25oh" linrit as stated in Section 7-3 -5 of the Standard Specifications. The actual amount for this itcrn will bc dictatcd by thc actual quantity uscd, and thc A-ecncy rcscrvcs thc right to increase or decrease the quantity of this item accorcringry. ** Contractor shall coordinate with tlre City if additional days are requireclfor the project. f This bid item is considered a Specialty Item per Section 3-2 of the Stanclarcl Specifications. alter the
commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. Upon issr-rance of the Notice to Proceed.

Contractor shall irnrnediately place order for long-lead time iterls (i.e. traffic signal equipment).

The Contractor shall submit a construction schedule'uvithin ten (10) working daysfrorl the clate of award of contract, wliich shall include the lead-tirnes for any item requiring long lead-times. The liquidated darnages arnount, in lieu of the arrourlt specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standarcl Item Description Qty Unit Unit Price Amount
TO'TAL ADD ALTERNATE NO.3 BIt) $ 4,5rr,n4u.oo
The undersigned bidder hereby proposes to conrplete the Work fbr the total base hicl anrount slrorvn P-13 of P-30
gompletion (5 total phases\ and 30 working dairs rnaximum for UpRR phase completion as shorvn City Council 18 – 31 9/17/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA REBID

Vido Samazich - President
Vido L. Samarzich - Vice President
Monika Samazich - Secretary
City Council P-14 of P-30 18 – 32 9/17/2024
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 18 – 33 9/17/2024
City Council 18 – 34 9/17/2024
City Council 18 – 35 9/17/2024
EXHIBIT 4
Construction Contract 19,170,060.00 $
Contract Administration, Inspection and Testing 2,462,934.00 $ Contingencies 1,917,006.00 $
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 23,550,000.00
CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT NOS.: 20-6965 Standard Ave Bikeway from Warner Ave to 2nd Street; 20-6962 McFadden Ave Bikeway from Harbor Blvd to Grand Ave; 23-6707 Standard Ave Pavement Rehabilitation from Warner Ave to 2nd Street; 23- 6705 McFadden Ave Rehabilitation from Harbor Blvd to Fairview St; 19-6923 McFadden Ave Rehabilitation From Fairview St to Raitt St; 23-6706 McFadden Ave Rehabilitation from Raitt St to Grand Ave

COST ANALYSIS
City Council 18 – 36 9/17/2024
EXHIBIT 5
City Council 18 – 37 9/17/2024
City Council 18 – 38 9/17/2024
City Council 18 – 39 9/17/2024
City Council 18 – 40 9/17/2024
City Council 18 – 41 9/17/2024
EXHIBIT 6
CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 18/19

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT TITLE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT NEED:

Reconstruction/resurfacing of existing pavement and
replacement/installation of missing or damaged, curbs,
gutters, sidewalks, driveway approaches, and
wheelchair ramps within this segment of roadway.

The City's Pavement Management Program has been
developed to identify total deferred maintenance
requirements for the City's arterial network and to move toward preventative maintenance. As one of the City's
arterial streets, McFadden Avenue pavement
rehabilitation is identified as a high priority in the
Pavement Management Program.

McFadden Avenue Rehabilitation: Fairview to
Raitt
PROJECT CATEGORY:

Street Improvements
Arterial Street Rehabilitation

LOCATION MAP
PROJECT COSTS FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 Construction
Engineering
$1,004,536
$90,325
TOTAL $1,094,861
PROJECT FUNDS FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 M2 LOCAL $1,004,536

FAIRSHARE
RMRA SB1 $90,325
TOTAL $1,094,861
AGENCY:

Public Works Agency
DIVISION:

Design Engineering
CONTACT:

Jason Gabriel, Principal Civil Engineer
DATE:
08-May-2018
- 8 -
City Council 18 – 42 9/17/2024
CITY OF SANTA ANA FY20/21CIP

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT TITLE:

Standard Avenue Protected Bike Lanes: 3rd to
Warner
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Provide a protected bike lane on Standard Avenue from 3rd Street to Warner Avenue. This project will provide connections to future bike facilities.

PROJECT NEED:

Project is designed to increase pedestrian/bicyclist safety and mobility.

PROJECT CATEGORY:

Traffic Improvements
Traffic Safety / Mobility

LOCATION MAP
PROJECT COSTS FY 20/21
5,444,000
5,444,000
FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27
Construction Engineering - - - - - -

TOTAL - - - - - -
SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 20/21
5,444,000
5,444,000
FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27
ATP - SB1 Augmentation - - - - - -

TOTAL - - - - - -
AGENCY: DIVISION: CONTACT: DATE:

Public Works Design Engineering Sean Thomas, Senior Civil Engineer 04-May-2020 City Council 18 – 43 23 9/17/2024
CITY OF SANTA ANA FY20/21CIP

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT TITLE:

McFadden Avenue Protected Bike Lane and
Bicycle Boulevard Project: Harbor to Grand
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROJECT NEED:

This project is designed to increase bicyclists' safety and mobility.

Provide a Class 4 Protected Bike Lane and Class 3 Bicycle Boulevard from Harbor Boulevard to Grand Avenue in the City of Santa Ana. Project will include some pavement work, sidewalk, ramps, medians, striping and signal modifications.

PROJECT CATEGORY:

Traffic Improvements
Traffic Safety / Mobility

LOCATION MAP
PROJECT COSTS FY 20/21
5,875,000
5,875,000
FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27
Construction Engineering - - - - - -

TOTAL - - - - - -
SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 20/21
5,875,000
5,875,000
FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27
ATP - SB1 Augmentation - - - - - -

TOTAL - - - - - -
AGENCY: DIVISION: CONTACT: DATE:

Public Works Design Engineering Kenny Nguyen, Senior Civil Engineer 04-May-2020 City Council 18 – 44 25 9/17/2024
Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/public-works
Item # 19
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
September 17, 2024
TOPIC: Resolution Declaring City-Owned Properties as Exempt Surplus Land

AGENDA TITLE
Resolution Declaring City-Owned Properties as Exempt Surplus Land and Directing the City Manager or their Designee to Comply with the Requirement of Government Code §54220 et seq. for the Sale and Activation of Surplus Land

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Adopt a resolution declaring City-owned property as exempt surplus land and directing the City Manager or designee to comply with the requirements of Government Code §54220 et seq. for the sale and transfer of ownership.

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DECLARING VARIOUS PROPERTIES AS

EXEMPT SURPLUS LAND AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO

FOLLOW THE PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN THE SURPLUS LAND ACT, CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54220, ET SEQ., AS

AMENDED, FOR THEIR DISPOSITION

2. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the sales of the properties as surplus are exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15312 (Surplus Government Property Sales).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
The City owns real property assets that were acquired for various roadway improvement projects and are remnant following capital enhancements. There are miscellaneous portions of land that have remained vacant or landlocked, whose best use would be to adjoin to the adjacent property since they cannot be developed independently. In total, there are 26 remnant parcels ranging in size from 335 square feet to 7,105 square feet throughout the City identified for disposition.

Staff recommends that these remnant parcels be disposed of to generate new property taxes to fund City services and operations. Additionally, the activation of these vacant City Council 19 – 1 9/17/2024
Resolution Declaring City-Owned Properties Exempt Surplus Land September 17, 2024

Page 2 ends

Santa Ana City CouncilSeptember 17, 2024

Santa Ana City Council
September 17, 2024