Ibarra, Evelyn
From: NickValencia <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday,
To: eComment
Subject: PublicComment - CityCouncil - Nov19th, AgendaItem #35 Attention: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachmentsorlinks.
DearCityCouncil Members ofSantaAna,
Iamwritingtoexpress mystrongsupport fortheproposed ordinance tobanshort-termrentals (STRs) inourcity. The proliferation ofSTRshassignificantly impacted SantaAna’shousing landscape, leading toprofound andadverse consequences forourcommunity.
Manyproperty owners haveacquired homes solelytoprofitfromshort-termrentaloperations, creating atrendthat undermines theintegrityofourneighborhoods. Whileitistruethatissues likenoiseandtrashmayonlyapplytocertain properties, thebroaderimplications ofSTRsareundeniable andfar-reaching. EachSTRnotonlyreduces thenumber of available homesbutalsodrivesuphousing pricesacross theboard. Theseproperties areoftenpurchased atapremium, distorting market dynamics andexacerbating thealready critical shortage ofaffordable housing.
Banning STRswouldallowhundreds ofhomes tobereintroduced tothemarket, increasing thehousing supplyand helping toalleviate thefinancial strainonfamilies whowishtomakeSantaAnatheirpermanent home. Thisaction wouldrepresent asignificant steptoward fostering stability andaffordability forresidents, ensuring thatourcommunity remains vibrant, diverse, andsustainable.
Iurgeyoutosupport theordinance banning short-termrentalsandprioritize thelong-termwell-beingofSantaAna families overtheprofit-driveninterests ofSTRinvestors. Letusputtheneedsofresidents firstandworktomakeour citymoreaccessible andlivableforeveryone.
Thank youforconsidering thisimportant matter.
Sincerely,
NickValencia
1 Ibarra, Evelyn
From: MarthaStewart <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday,
To: eComment
Subject: BanningSTRs - 35
Attention: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachmentsorlinks.
I’mreaching outasaresident ofWestMemory Lane, whereInowfindmyselflivingnexttothreeshort-termrentals.
Whatusedtobeaclose-knitneighborhood hasturnedintoarevolving doorofstrangers, anditnolongerfeelslike home.
Theconstant turnover means nofamiliarfaces, nosenseofcommunity, andareallossofwhatmadeourstreetspecial.
Beyond thenoiseandoccasional disturbances, therealissueisthattheseSTRsaredrivinguphousing costsandtaking homesawayfromfamilies whowanttobepartofSantaAnalong-term.
Bybanning STRs, wecanbringbackstability andhelprestore thestrong, connected neighborhoods thatSantaAna deserves.
Thank youforconsidering thissteptoprotectourcommunity.
1 Ibarra, Evelyn
From: AnaGomez <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November
To: eComment
Subject: November19thCityCouncilMeeting- Item35
Attachments: LettertoCityCouncilmemberNovember19thmeeting.docx Attention: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachmentsorlinks. 1 MayorValerie Amezcua
MayorProTemThaiVietPham
Councilmember Benjamin Vazquez
Councilmember Jessie Lopez
Councilmember PhilBacerra
Councilmember Johnathan RyanHernandez
Councilmember DavidPenaloza
CityCouncil Chamber
20CivicCenter PlazaM-30
SantaAna, California 92701
Re: November 19th, 2024, CityCouncil Meeting – Item35 – Conduct aFirst Reading andAdopt Ordinance Amendment (OA) No. 2024-04Repealing and Reenacting initsEntirety ArticleXXItoChapter 8oftheSantaAnaMunicipal Code (SAMC) Prohibiting Short-Term Rentals (STRS), andAdoptEnhanced Fines forViolation oftheShortTerm Rentals Ordinance
Irespectfully askcitycouncil toreconsider placing acomplete banonSTRs andto request thatamendments, carve-outs, andorexceptions bemade foron-sitehomesharing short-termrental homeowners.
Intheensuing months afterthepassage oftheshort-termrental ordinance inApril ofthisyear, wehavehadmeetings/conversations (viaZoom, facetoface conversations andemail correspondence) withmostofthecitycouncilmembers withexception ofCouncilmembers Vasquez, Bacerra andPenaloza) aswellasthe Mayorregarding home sharing short-termrentals. Mostofthecouncilmembers expressed willingness toworkwithonsitehome-sharing STRs homeowners. As residents oftheCityofSantaAna & on-sitehome-sharing STRs homeowners, we wereagainst taking anylegalaction against thecityandarenotaparty totheongoing lawsuit filedbySASTRA.
Howarewedifferent fromother short-termrentals inthecity? Weareresidents in theCityofSantaAna. Weareinvested inourcommunity andcity. Werentaroom inourhome oragranny flat/mother-in-lawsuiteattached/detached toourprimary home. Weareonsiteduring allstaysandcarefully vetallpotential guest(s) toensure theymeetourlisting rules. Furthermore, nowhere inthecitystaffreport dated 1 November 19, 2024does thereport statehow, ifany, doeson-sitehome-sharing STRs affect theCity’sRegional Housing NeedsAllocation (RHNA). Iwould argue thatithaslittletonoimpact tothecity’sRHNA.
Inoursituation, werentoutaroominourprimary residence. Weareon-siteatall times. Wehavenever hadacompliant fromanyofourneighbors. Infact, some of ourneighbors haveutilized ourguestroom suite when theyhaveextended family members visiting during holidays orbusiness associates intownformeetings.
Wehavealways maintained ourproperty tothehighest standards inordertoretain thefeelandcharm oftheneighborhood.
Theincome derived fromourSTRhelpsustonotonlymaintain ourhome butmost importantly, helps mekeepmyelderly fatherinhishome. Ifandwhen thetime comes thatmyfather cannolongerliveonhisown, thenitisourplantohave him move intoourguestroom suite. Eliminating STRs income would place astrain on ourfinancial wellbeing especially withthenewadministration coming innextyear andtheuncertainty ofwhatistocome.
Weurgethecitytoreconsider acomplete banandworkwithon-sitehome sharing STRs homeowners.
Sincerely,
AnaGomez
Richard Austin
SantaAnaResidents
Ward 3
directed tocome backwithoptions and/orcodechanges (bespecific onshort-term rentals) onOctober 20, 2015. Notonceduring theSept1
stthor15 citycouncil
meetings wasthecodeeverreferred toapermissive codeorprescriptive code 2 The citycouncil meeting onOctober 15, 2015, Agenda #75A extending the moratorium, wasultimately allowed toexpire. Comments fromcouncilmembers expressed support fortheshared economy, theydidnotwanttobeprohibitive, restrictive oroverreach.
What haschanged sinceOctober 2015? Nothing…studywasnever completed; codes werenever updated toaddress short termrentals. Somehow between 2015andnow, thecodewasnowbeing referred toasapermissive code. Thecodestilllacks clarity asitpertains toshorttermrentals.
Iftherehasbeenaproliferation ofshort-termrentals, thefaultlieswiththeplanning commission. Asshort-termrental owners (on-siteowners andresponsible shortterm rental (‘STR’) owners), weactively sought toworkwiththeplanning commission.
Wemetwiththeplanning commission shortly aftertheSeptember 26, 2022planning commission meeting, inwhich codeamendments werebeing discussed. Shortterm rental prohibition wasontheplanning commission agenda asaZoning Ordinance Amendment No. 2022-03 (theitemwasultimately taken offcalendar foralater date). Weproposed aSTRprogram withregulations andsupplied copies ofother cityguidelines totheplanning commission. Again, wedidnothearanything back fromtheplanning commission. Ayearlater, inDecember 11, 2023, theplanning commission didashort-termrentalwork study session power pointpresentation.
Mostplanning commissioners wereopentohaving aprogram inplaceandcollecting TOT’s (transient occupancy tax). InJanuary 2024, some ofusreceived anemail fromtheplanning commission requesting suggestions and/orcomments ona proposed STRprogram inSantaAna. Weallresponded within theallotted time frame forcomments and/orsuggestions. Wefeltwewerefinally moving forward.
So, itwasasurprise toallofusthatoverthenextcouple ofmonths some theofSTR owners started receiving cease anddetest letters. TheninApril2024weweretaken aback bytheproposed andultimate passage oftheUrgency Ordinance andthefirst reading ofanOrdinance Amending theSAMC adding ArticleXXItoChapter 8of theSAMC Prohibiting ShortTerm Rentals.
3 TheUrgency Ordinance contained faultyorincomplete datathatmayhavehada different outcome onApril2, 2024.
BoththeUrgency Ordinance andtheOrdinance statethatshorttermrentals remove housing stock thatcould beotherwise available forlongtermrentalorsale. The number ofSTRreported inSantaAnais1100. Thepower pointpresentation made inDecember of2023shows suspected 1120rental units inSantaAnaasreported by Granicus (software solutions andinformation onSTRs). Thenumbers werecollected fromvarious STRplatforms. Whatwasn’tdisclosed isthatoneSTRcanbelisted on 2ormoreplatforms, soinstead ofcounting just1STR, theSTRwascounted twice ormore. Granicus states ontheirwebsite (https://support.granicus.com/s/article/AddressIdentification-FAQ?language=en_US), underHostCompliance FAQ that “\[i\]tisvery common forasingle rentalunittobeadvertised across multiple listings, andasa result youwillalways seeahigher number oflistings inyourjurisdiction compared tothenumber ofrental units.” Didthereported 1100STRunitsbyGranicus remove duplicate listings? Complicating thenumbers evenmore, 1STRhome renting one ormoreprivate roomwillbecounted astwounits versus oneunit.
Thebreakdown oftypesofSTRwould havebeenhelpful asitwould havegiven city council abetter picture ofthenumber andtypesofSTRinSantaAna. Over45% of STRrentals inSantaAnaare1bd/1baunit (private rooms, guesthouses, guest suites).
ThesetypesofSTRs would havenoimpact onavailable housing stock. Furthermore, these typesofSTRhavenoeffect onincreasing rents, affordability anddoesnot divertasignificant portion ofavailable housing away frompermanent resident.
Removing these typesofSTRfromthereported 1100STRwould reduce the percentage STRhasonthecity’sRegional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for 2021-2029.
Banning shorttermrentals willnotwork. Granicus talksabout shorttermrentals bansgonewrong (https://granicus.com/blog/short-term-vacation-rental-bans-gonewrong/). Some oftheitems discussed intheblogare: legality ofaban, lawsuits, loss 4 oftaxrevenues andspending fromhomeowners withgreater income streams asa resultoftheirrental income.
Iaskcitycouncil toreconsider theUrgency Ordinance & second reading of Ordinance. Appeal orsuspend bothandlet’sbringstakeholders back tothetableto discuss areasonable STRprogram regulation.
Thank you—
AnaGomez
5 Ibarra, Evelyn
From: AbboudKhallouf <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, November
To: eComment
Subject: Fwd: Tuesday: SantaAnadiscussingtheSTRprohibition Attention: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachmentsorlinks.
DearSir, Madam,
Following theAIRBNB email (Seebelowplease) I"'mwritingtodaytoletyouknowthatI'mwiththecity'sdecision to prohibit theSTRandifyouwanttoreplace
itwithanother prohibition I'malsosupporting this.
Sincerely.
AlexKhallouf
Forwarded message ---------
From: AirbnbTeam <getinvolved@airbnb. com>
PM
Subject: Tuesday: SantaAnadiscussing theSTRprohibition
To: <
HiAlex,
ThisTuesday, November19th, theSantaAnaCityCouncilwillholdameetingtorepealtherushedprohibitiononshorttermrentals (STRs) andreplaceitwithanotherprohibition. Asyouknow, thisproposalwouldthreatenthelivelihoodsof hostslikeyouandnegativelyimpactthesmallbusinessesthatrelyonSTRguests. TheCityneedstohearfromlocal hostswhocansharehowSTRssupportlocalfamiliesandthelocaleconomy.
What: SantaAnaCityCouncilandHousingAuthorityMeeting
When: Tuesday, November19th: 5:30pm
Where: ZoomatthislinkOR
CityCouncilChambers
22CivicCenterPlazaSantaAna, CA92701
Ifyoucan’tattendthemeetingin-person, youcanstillemailtheCityClerk’[email protected]. Youcan readtheagendahereformoredetails.
ToconnectwithotherlocalHosts, youcanalsojointheCoastalOrangeCountyAreaAirbnbHostCommunitygroup.
Thanks,
TheAirbnbTeam
Clickheretounsubscribe
To help
protect your
privacy,
Microsoft
Office
prevented
automatic
download of
this picture
from the
Internet.
1 Ibarra, Evelyn
From: SantaAnaShortTermRentalAlliance <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November18, 202411:35AM
To: eComment
Subject: AgendaItem #35 - PublicComment - (Nov. 19th) CityCouncilMeeting Attachments: STR_Guide_Council.pdf
Attention: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachmentsorlinks.
DearCityClerk, (pleaseconfirmreceipt)
RE: Agenda Item #35 - Public Comment - CityCouncilMeeting (Nov. 19th) We (SantaAnaShort-TermRentalAlliance - SASTRA) haveattachedaPDFofourPublicComments regardingAgendaItem #35 (Short-termRentals). Wewouldliketorequestthisdocumentbesharedwithall SantaAnaCouncilmembers.
AttachedPDF: Short-TermRentalGuide (+ LettertoCouncilMember, page2) LinktoDownloadAttachedSASTRASTRGuide: CLICKHERE
Wewillalsobesubmittinga "RequesttoSpeak" cardforthepubliccommentperiodsduringtheNovember 19thmeeting.
Thankyouforyourassistance, (pleaseconfirmreceipt)
Jeremy LeClair, Realtor®
SantaAnaAirbnbHost
DRE # 02161730 | FINER LIVING RealEstate
TextorDirect: (949) 510-5605
To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. 1 Ibarra, Evelyn
From: TiffanyPerry <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, November18, 202412:16PM
To: eComment
Cc: AliciaBartley; Montoya, Jose; AmyHoyt; HannahPark
Subject: November19, 2024, CityCouncilMeeting – Item35: OrdinanceAmendmentNo. 2024-04
Attachments: LettertoSantaAnaCityCouncildated11-18-24.pdf Attention: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachmentsorlinks.
MayorAmezcua andHonorable CityCouncilmembers,
A?ached pleasendale?ertoyouoftoday’sdateregarding theCityCouncil mee?ngonNovember 19, 2024 (Item35:
Ordinance Amendment No. 2024-04). Ifyouhaveanyquestions, pleasedonothesitate tocontact ouroffice.
Tiffany Perry
LegalAssistant
Gaines & StaceyLLP
5820CanogaAvenue, Suite300
Woodland Hills, CA91367
Telephone - 818-933-0200ext. 1212
Fax - 818-933-0222
[email protected] | website
Thismessageandanyattacheddocumentsareintendedonlyfortheuseoftheindividualorentitytowhichitisaddressed, andmaycontain informationthatisPRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIALandexemptfromdisclosureunderapplicablelaw. Ifthereaderofthismessageisnotthe intendedrecipient, ortheemployeeoragentresponsiblefordeliveringthemessagetotheintendedrecipient, youareherebynotifiedthatany dissemination, distributionorcopyingofthiscommunicationisstrictlyprohibited. Ifyouhavereceivedthiscommunicationinerror, pleasenotifyus immediatelybytelephoneorreturne-mail, andreturntheoriginaltouswithoutmakingacopy. Thankyou. 1 5820CanogaAvenue, Suite300
Woodland Hills, CA91367
T (818) 933-0200
F (818) 933-0222
www.gaineslaw.com
November 18, 2024
VIAEMAIL eComment@santa- ana.org
MayorValerie Amezcua
MayorProTemThaiVietPhan
Councilmember Benjamin Vazquez
Councilmember Jessie Lopez
Councilmember PhilBacerra
Councilmember Johnathan RyanHernandez
Councilmember DavidPenaloza
SantaAnaCityCouncil
CityCouncil Chamber
20CivicCenterPlaza M- 30
SantaAna, CA92701
Re: November 19, 2024, CityCouncil Meeting Item35: Ordinance Amendment No. 2024- 04Repealing andReenacting initsEntirety ArticleXXItoChapter 8oftheSantaAna Municipal CodeProhibiting Short-TermRentals, andAdoptEnhanced Fines for Violations oftheShort-TermRentals Ordinance
DearMayorAmezcua andHonorable CityCouncilmembers,
Thislawoffice represents theSantaAnaShortmembers ownandoperate STRswithin theCity. Thank youfortheopportunity tosubmit these comments on behalfoftheRentalAlliance on
2024-04, amending theSantaAnaMunicipal Code ( SAMC) torepeal andreenact aprohibition onshort-termrentals ( STRs) .
Aswedetailbelow, consistent withmanyofourpriorcomments, the prohibition ofSTRs would (a) resultinsignificant environmental impacts, (b) violate stateandfederal law, and (c) unconstitutionally infringe ontherightsofhostsandtheirguests. Wealsopresent new evidence bytechnical experts demonstrating theSTRbanwilladversely impact thephysical environment bycausing reasonably foreseeable increases invehicle miles traveled , air pollutants (andrelated adverse health consequences), greenhouse gas emissions, andfossilfuel consumption. Asjustoneexample fromtheattached technical reports: whencomparing visitors staying atahotel compared toanSTR, mobile emissions ofvolatile organic compounds, nitrogen oxides , andmicroparticulates allscientifically proventocontribute tosmog andincrease risksofcancer, asthma, lungdamage, andotherhealth impairmentswere calculated SantaAnaCityCouncil
November 18, 2024
toincreasebyover400%. These impacts riskharming sensitive receptors andenvironmental justice communities contrary tostate, regional, andlocalpolicies. iswoefully inadequate inanalyzing anddisclosing these impacts tothecommunity.
Werespectfully request thatyourepeal theexisting ArticleXXItoChapter 8oftheSMC (which wasadopted illegally inApril2024) anddirectStafftoworkwithstakeholders todevelop anew ordinance thatunderscores thatSTRsmaycontinue operating, subject toreasonable regulations, Background ontheSantaAnaShort-TermRentalAlliance andChallenge totheApril2024 STROrdinance
TheSantaAnaShort-TermRentalAlliance anunincorporated community association made upofhardworking residents ofboththeCityofSantaAnaandSouthern California thatownand/ormanage homes located withinCitylimits rented onashort-termbasis.
Theycomefromdiverse backgrounds andcallCalifornia home. InApril2024, theCityunlawfully enacted anordinance banning STRs intheCitywithalmost nopublic notice and without undertaking theenvironmental review required bytheCalifornia Environmental QualityAct Thataction threatened todestroy
security, closed thedoortoSantaAnaforcountless would-bevisitors, anddisproportionately affected theindividuals andfamilies mostinneedofflexible housing options andwhoareoften shutoutofthelong-termresidential housing market.
Inresponse tothatillegal action, thisoffice filedachallenge onbehalfoftheRentalAlliance in Orange County Superior Court (SantaAnaShort-TermRentalAlliance v. CityofSantaAna, No.
TC24-5449 (Orange County Superior Court). While wearepleased thatStaffhasbrought forward aproposal torescind theillegally adopted ordinance, theAmended Ordinance proposes toadopt theexact same banonSTRs asadopted inApril. Assummarized herein, theAmended Ordinance islegally flawed, andshould theCitymoveforward withreadopting theban, theRentalAlliance intends tochallenge theAmended Ordinance.
History andImportance ofSTRs inSantaAna
STRs havealways beenlawful, residential usesinSantaAna. Hosts haveopened andshared their homes totransient renters fordecades, providing important visitor-serving accommodations and offering guests authentic cultural experiences inallcorners oftheCity. These rentals provide an opportunity forvisitors toOrange County tomeetandinteract withlocalswhograciously share theirhomes. Andwiththe exception ofabrief2015moratorium thatexpired onitsownterms, STRshave longbeenarecognized activity inSantaAna. Indeed, manyoftheRentalAlliance members haveacquired abusiness license fromtheCityforeachrentalunitthattheyownor manage.
2 SantaAnaCityCouncil
November 18, 2024
STRshelptomakehousing affordable forthosehomeowners whoareableto home share and earnmoney byrenting portions oftheirhouses, ortheentire house, foraperiod oftime. Thishelps makehomeownership possible formanySantaAnaresidents whootherwise couldnotaffordthe highcostofhousing.
Home sharing hasmade communities throughout California accessible tomoreandmore familieseven ifonlyforaweekend. Itfosters vibrant anddiverse communities andsupports a robust tourism economy statewide. Without STRs, many desirable vacation destinations, suchas Orange County, would likelybelessaccessible forawidevariety offamilies.
Home sharing alsoaddresses
full-timeresidents whoareunable topaysteep residential move-incosts, which typically include advance payment offirstandlastmonths rentand asizeable security deposit, canimmediately occupy anSTRwithout thesubstantial up-frontcost. Inthisway, STRs canimmediately supply housing tofillacritical gapinavailability facing California cities. STRs alsoplayanimportant roleforaspiring residents seeking tosample, andthenselect, thetypeandlocation oftheir preferred long-termrental home orhome purchase.
extensive benefits
isparticularly troubling.
TheProhibition ofSTRsWillHaveSignificant Environmental Impacts ThatHaveNotBeen Evaluated underCEQA
TheAmended Ordinance willhavesignificant environmental impacts, andtheCityhasfailedto appropriately evaluate these impacts underCEQA. Assummarized next, theevidence isclearthat theSTRbanwillimpact thephysical environment, resulting inreasonably foreseeable direct increases invehicle milestraveled, airpollutants (withadverse health consequences), greenhouse gas emissions, energy use (including fossilfuels), andmore. TheCityhasfallenfarshortof analyzing these directimpacts inconformance withCEQA. Whatismore, theCitypatently ignores reasonably foreseeable indirect effects spurred bytheSTRban, suchasnewconstruction to account forincreased hoteldemand, andcumulative impacts resulting fromcascading regional impacts fromsimilar STRbans. Despite ourstrenuous requests during theApril2024hearings and thesubsequent litigation, theCitycontinues toshirkitsresponsibilities underCEQAtoanalyze anddisclose thetrueconsequences ofitsactions.
1. TheCityinappropriately reliesonanaddendum toanEIRforacompletely different, unrelated project.
GPPEIR) is
impermissible underCEQAbecause theAmended Ordinance constitutes anewproject thathas notbeenpreviously reviewed, andthechanges itintroduces aresubstantial, requiring new environmental review.
3 SantaAnaCityCouncil
November 18, 2024
CEQAprovides thatachanged project mayonlyundergo astreamlined subsequent environmental review under certain circumstances thattrigger eitherasubsequent EIR, asupplemental EIR, or anaddendum toapreviously certified EIR. (SeeCEQA Guidelines §§ 1516264.) Anaddendum toapreviously certified EIRisappropriate onlywhenthenecessary changes oradditions donot trigger asubsequent orsupplemental EIR, meaning thechanges oradditions areminoranddonot involve newsignificant environmental effects orasubstantial increase intheseverity ofpreviously identified significant effects. (CEQA Guidelines §§ 15162 and15164.) project thathasbeensubject toenvironmental review; theprovisions donotapplyiftheagency hasproposed anewprojectnotpreviously analyzed intheoriginalenvironmental document Martis Camp Community Association v. County ofPlacer (2020) 53Cal.App.5th569, 606n.26 emphasis added\]; seealsoFriends ofCollege ofSanMateo Gardens v. SanMateo County Community College Dist. (2016) 1Cal.5th937,
havenoapplication iftheagency hasproposed anewproject thathasnotpreviously beensubject TheStaffReport asks theCitytocertify anaddendum based ontheGPPEIRthatdidnotreview theenvironmental impacts oftheAmended Ordinance orevenacknowledge theexistence ofSTRs intheCity. TheAmended
CEQAandtheuseofanaddendum oranyother subsequent environmental review pathway is insufficient tocomply withCEQA. Further, Friends ofCollege ofSanMateo Gardens heldthatin orderforaleadagency torelyonapreviously certified CEQAdocument, thatdocument must Friends ofCollege ofSanMateoGardens v.
SanMateo County Community College Dist. (2017) 11Cal.App.5th596, 605.) Here, because the GPPEIRdoesnotanalyze theimpacts ofbanning shorttermrentals orevenmention shortterm rentals atall, itretains noinformational valueastotheAmended Ordinance. Indeed, theGPPEIR offersnoinformational valueonthereasonably foreseeable direct, indirect andcumulative impacts fromtheSTRbanbecause theGPPEIRanalysis completely ignores STRs. TheProposed Ordinance isanewproject constituting asubstantial change fromtheconditions contemplated in zoning codehadalways prohibited STRs andinstead heldthatanordinance expressly banning STRswa
Keenv. CityofManhattan Beach (2022) 77Cal.App.5th142, 14849.) Here, likeinKeen, the Amended
theCitycannotrelyonpreviously approved documents thatdidnotcontemplate theimpacts of theAmended Ordinance.
aprogram EIRisemployed, ifalaterproposal isnoteitherthesame asorwithin thescope ofthe project described intheprogram EIR . . . itistreated asane SaveOurAccess v. CityofSanDiego (2023) 92Cal.App.5th819, 845.) \[internal quotations and citations omitted\].) Aprogram EIRthatdoesnotinclude any discussion oranalysis ofalater proposed activity isnotadequate toinform thepublicoftheenvironmental effects ofthatlater activity suchthatthelateractivity isoutside thescope oftheprogram EIR. (Id. at852-53.) The 4 SantaAnaCityCouncil
November 18, 2024
GPPEIRdoesnotdiscuss, analyze, orinform thepublicoftheenvironmental effects associated withtheAmended Ordinance. Therefore, eveniftheCityweretoassess theAmended Ordinance undertheGPPEIR, theenvironmental impacts oftheSTRbanwereadequately assessed bythe scope oftheGPPEIRandtherefore theSTRbanmustbefullyanalyzed withaproject-specific EIR.
Theevidence isclearthat anEIRisneeded
because theSTRbanislikely tocause potentially significant impacts totheenvironment thatwere notcovered bytheGPPEIR. (Id
employed, ifalaterproposal isnoteitherthesameasorwithin thescope oftheproject deferential substantial evidence standard\] \[ emphasis added\].) Inaddition, eveniftheGPPEIRwerereliedupon, thehigh-level, programmatic nature oftheGP PEIRtranslates toalackofdetailthatrequires much morethanashortaddendum tocorrect.
Rather, asupplemental orsubsequent EIRisneeded because theSTRbancannot beaddressed onlypermitted where minor changes areneeded totheprioranalysis. Asdetailed herein, the complete absence ofprioranalysis ofSTRs, letalonetheSTRban, requires changes tomany topic areas covered byCEQAandraises newpotentially significant impacts thatcannot beaddressed withminor clarifications.
Amended Ordinance based onanaddendum orany
other subsequent, supplemental, ortiered analysis based ontheGPPEIRwould violate CEQA.
2. Thepotentially significant environmental impacts ofanSTRbanrequire theCitytoprepare anewEIR.
Evenifanaddendum wereappropriate, the51-pageAddendum fallsfarshortofappropriately analyzing anddisclosing impacts underCEQA. TheGPPEIRissilentonSTRs andtheAddendum contains onlyacursory, superficial, andunsupported analysis oftheSTRban. Asdetailed in Attachment Atothisletter (CAJAEnvironmental Services, Potential Significant Environmental Effects ofBanning Short-TermRentals intheCityofSanta andRequirement Require Additional Environmental Analysis Under CEQA, November 14, thereareseveral potentially significant direct environmental impacts thatcouldresultfromaSTRbanintheCity, including butnotlimited to:
Airquality. TheSTRbanwouldresultinanincreaseindailymobileemissionsof approximately 443percentofNOxand444percentofPM 2.5 fromguestsofSTRs transitioning tousinghotels. (CAJA Report, pp. 2-3.) NOxcauses adverse health consequences including breathing difficulties andincreased riskofchronic pulmonary fibrosis aswellasbronchitis inchildren. PM 2.5candamage therespiratory tract, increasing thenumber andseverity ofasthma attacks, andaggravating bronchitis andotherlung Ramboll Memo re
Environmental Analysis ofShort-TermRental Regulation datedNovember 14, 2024, p. 3.) 5 SantaAnaCityCouncil
November 18, 2024
Construction ofnewhotels without emissions mitigation would resultinanexcesscancer riskof48inamillionforthemaximum exposedindividual exceeding bymorethan4 CAJA Report, p. 2.)
Environmental Justice Community impacts. TheSTRbanwould disproportionately byregional pollution andlocalized traffic exposure arelocated neartheexisting hotelstock andwould bedirectly impacted byincreased hotelusage inresponse totheSTRban, increasing theknown pollution contributors torespiratory andcardiovascular health risks inthese communities. (CAJA Report, p. 3.)
Traffic concentration andhealth impacts. TheSTRbancouldincrease traffic concentrated onroadways goingtothehotels intheCityby7,560vehicles perday, resulting inhealth impacts that wouldexceedtheSCAQMD CEQAthreshold of significance forcancerrisk. (CAJA Report, p. 3.)
Energy. TheSTRbanwould increase energy demand because hotels usemoreenergy per person thanSTRs (morethan5xmoreelectricity, morethan2xmorenaturalgas). (CAJA Report, p. 3.) Byincreasing VMT, theSTRbanwould alsoincrease reliance onfossilfuels topower vehicle tripsthe dailymobile fuelconsumption forhotels ismorethanfivetimes greater forhotels compared toSTRs forbothgasoline anddieselinconsistent withregional andstateclimate goals. (CAJA Report, p. 3.)
GHGemissions. TheSTRbanwould resultinanincreaseofdailymobileemissionsof GHGby443percent, contributing toasignificant increase inemissions intheareaindirect conflict withregional andstategoals toreduceVMTandGHGemissions fromvehicle trips. (CAJAReport, p. 3.) Further, Ramboll concluded thattheincreased energy demand associated withhotels compared toSTRswould resultina179percent increase inGHG emissions perperson. (CAJA Report, p. 3.)
Noise. TheSTRbancouldconcentrate trafficonroadways goingtohotels inthearea, since manyhotels intheCityarelocated inoneconcentrated areaoftheCity, resulting innoise potentially exacerbating existingnoiseimpactsorcreating anewsignificant noise impact. (CAJA, p. 4.)
There arealsopotential i
newhotelspace construction. TheSTRbanwillcause potentially significant newimpacts related tohotel construction including airquality andhealth impacts fromconstruction emissions Report p. 4.)
These andtheother potentially significant environmental impacts summarized inAttachment Ato thisletteralsomean theAmended Ordinance isnoteligible foraClass1exemption andthatthe Citymustprepare afullEIR.
6 SantaAnaCityCouncil
November 18, 2024
IftheCityCouncil weretoignore thesubstantial evidence intherecord ofpotential impacts and proceed withadopting theAmended Ordinance without firstpreparing anEIRtoanalyze these potentially significant impacts, alternatives totheSTRbanthatmayresult inlesserimpacts, and mitigation measures toreduce thepotential impacts, suchanactionwould constitute anabuse of discretion.
Prohibiting STRs inSantaAnaViolates StateandFederal Law Theprohibition ofSTRs intheCityviolates stateandfederal lawsinnumerous ways. Specifically:
1. STRs havelegally operated for
decades.
STRs haveoperated legally intheCityfordecades and theCityhasacknowledged theoperation ofSTRswithin itsboundaries foryears. Forinstance, onSeptember 15, 2015, theCityCouncil daytemporary moratorium onthe
establishment orexpansion ofanyshorttermresiden( Ordinance No. NS-2886.) donotclearly identify short-termresidential rentalusesortakeintoaccount thepotential impacts associated withtheestablishment ofSTRswithin existing residential zones. Assuch, provisions of . . . theCode . . . requirereview, study, andpossiblerevisioninordertorespond torecent concerns relating totheimpacts oftheseshort-( Id., Section 1.B emphasis added).) Importantly, the2015emergency ordinance forthemoratorium specially termresidential rental ispermitted inaresidential zoneasdefined inArticle Id., Section 2.) Ofcourse, thisnewprohibition would nothavebeen necessary hadSTRsnotbeenanexisting lawful useintheCity. OnOctober 20, 2015, theCity Council considered arecommendation toextend themoratorium adopted onSeptember 15, 2015, butitdeclined todoso. Theresult wasthatSTRs continued operating aslawfulresidential uses throughout theCity.
Then, aftercontinuously issuing ministerial business licenses forhosts renting theirproperty ona short-termbasisandlongafterthetemporary moratorium expired, theCitychanged itsposition.
Around early2022, theCitysuddenly claimed thatSTRswerepro andcommenced enforcement actions against existing hosts. And now, theCitystates intheStaffReport that STRs arenot, andhavenever been, apermitted use refore, STRs havealways beenprohibited bytheCityandthis 4, StaffReport, p. 3.)
mentioned intheMunicipal Codeinthecontext ofurban lotsplits. TheMunicipal Code ttedindwelling unitson
lotscreated byanurbanlotsplit. (SantaAnaMun. Code § 41.2109(l)(2); seealso id. § 41- 2115(l)(2) \[same prohibition fordwelling unitsonlotforTwo-UnitProjects\].) Notably, inbothof thesecodeprovisions, theprohibition onSTRsonthesetypesoflotsisinaseparate subpart 7 SantaAnaCityCouncil
November 18, 2024
SeeSantaAnaMun. Code
only. Nonon-residential useispermitted onanylotcreated byurban 2115(l)(2) \[same\].) IfSTRswerenotaresidential property use, theseparate prohibition would besuperfluous.
prohibited byomission throughout theentireCity. Afterall, whywould theCityprohibit them explicitly inoneplaceiftheywerealready impliedly prohibited everywhere? Iftheyareprohibited intheentireCity, sections 41-2109and41-2115would besuperfluousin violation ofCalifornia law. (InreC.H., 53Cal.4th94, 102-03 (2011) \[California courts strivetogivemeaning toevery wordinastatute andavoidconstructions thatrender words, phrases, orclauses superfluous.\]; Escamilla v. Vannucci, 97Cal.App.5th175, 187-88 (2023).) Homeowners cannot understand what isandisnotprohibited iftheCityadopts suchnonsensical readings ofitsownzoning provisions. foreclosed Keenv. CityofManhattan Beach. (77
Cal. App. 5th142 (Cal. Ct. App. 2022).) There, thecourt considered apermissive zoning ordinance didnotsayanything aboutSTRs. (Id.
quitesometime, . . . rented residential unitsinManhattan Beach onbothlong- andshort-term mplaints aboutarental
Id. at146.) Then, in2015, Manhattan Beach passed anordinance banning STRs and claimedmuch likeStaffhasdonehere
Ibid.)
TheCourtofAppeal squarely disagreed, holding always
permitted short-term, aswellaslong- Id. at148 (emphasis added).) The courtexplained thatoncethehouse orapartment building wasbuilt, anyone renter orowner distinction about thedura
Id. at148-
Id. at149.)
AsinKeenonthese residential uses. (SantaAnaMun. Code, § 41-184etseq.) And, justasinKeen, long-term rentalofresidential property ispermitted undertheexisting SantaAnacode. Andso, justasin Keen, without anydurational requirement forrentals inthecode, thereisnojustification forthe unfounded claimthatSTRs arecurrently forbidden.
8 SantaAnaCityCouncil
November 18, 2024
2. TheAmended Ordinance would unlawfully terminate existing, lawfulnonconforming uses Hansen
Bros. Enters., Inc. v. Bd. ofSupervisors, 907P.2d1324, 1327n.1 (Cal. 1996) (citingcases). The Id. California courts havelongheldthatapartymaycontinue tousetheir property eventhough suchuseisnonconforming. (Hillv. Manhattan Beach, 6Cal.3d279, 285-86 Cal. 1971); Livingston Rock & Gravel Co. v. LosAngeles County, 43Cal.2d121, 127 (Cal. 1954); Edmonds v. LosAngeles County, 40Cal.2d642, 651 (Cal. 1953); E.B. Jones v. CityofLosAngeles, 211Cal.304, 310-311 (Cal. 1930).) Thereason issimple: immediate termination ofpreviously lawful (andnownon-conforming) useswould beofdoubtful constitutionality. (Livingston Rock & Gravel Co., 43Cal. 2dat127; Edmonds, 40Cal. 2dat651.) Th principles, which provide thatwhenazoning ordinance changes, aproperty owner mayhavea Cityof
Ukiah v. County ofMendocino, 196Cal.App. 3d47, 56-57 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987).) aremaking lawful usesof
theirproperty, andtheyhavemade significant investments intheirhomes toofferthemasSTRs.
Settled California lawaffords them nonconforming userights tocontinue their STRuse. The Amended Ordinance cannot legally withdraw thoserights.
thatlegalnonconforming landusesmaycontinue subject tolimitations onexpansion or enlargement oftheuse, orabandonment ofuse. (SeeSantaAnaMun. Code § 41-683 41-689.)
3. Recent United StatesSupreme Court cases establish thattheAmended Ordinance would resultinataking, entitling allhostsofthe700+ existing STRs intheCitytocompensation.
TheDueProcess Clause oftheFourteenth Amendment safeguards rights deeply rooted inUnited withconstitutional framers emphasizing private property asbulwark against unlawful exercises of critical aspect oftheserights, protected bythe
Takings Clause oftheU.S. andCalifornia constitutions, which requires justcompensation for property takenordamaged forpublic use.
TheSupreme Courtrecently expanded physical takings lawtoencompass temporary and intermittent physical invasions similartodeprivations oftherighttolease. InCedarPointNursery v. Hassid, theCourtheldthataregulation requiring agricultural employers toallowunion organizers tohaveperiodic andtemporary access tofarmworkers ontheproperty constituted a physical (andnotaregulatory) taking. (594U.S. at143.)
fortheenjoyment ofthirdparties th
Id. at149.) Theordinance here not
onlyimpedes onthecorollary righttoinclude, italsoeffectively requires hoststoallowrenters 9 SantaAnaCityCouncil
November 18, 2024
righttoexclude.
Importantly, theFederal District CourtofHawaii recently considered anordinance similartothat proposed bySantaAnathatbarred certainSTRs. (- TermRentalAll. v. City & Cnty. ofHonolulu, 2022WL7471692, at *2-3 (D. Haw. Oct. 13, 2022).) motion forapreliminary injunction, thecourtheldthattheplaintiff wouldlikely succeed onthe meritsofatakings claimundertheFederal andHawaii Constitutions. (Id. at *5.) Because theOrdinance impacts boththerighttoinclude andtherighttoexclude from property, allexisting STRhostswould beentitled tocompensation iftheCityCouncil wereto adopt theAmended Ordinance.
4. Theadoption oftheAmended Ordinance would constitute arbitrary andcapricious decision-making.
Thereisnoevidence intherecord
record. STRsplayanimportant andenvironmentally sustainable roleintheCity, andprovide significant benefits totheCity, itsresidents, anditsvisitors, andthesebenefits arebeing completely ignored. TheStaffReport provides noevidence thatanySTRs intheCitycontribute tonuisanceacknowledge thattheSAMC already hasseveral existing enforcement mechanisms tomitigate public nuisances. (SAMC, Chapter 17.)
Inreality, manySTRs intheCityareeither owner-occupied, meaning thatthehostisonsitewhile guests arepresent because theylivetherefull-timeandhaveanextraroom/rooms, orareentire homeSTRswhich arerented onashort-termbasisbecause theownertravels orisintheCityonly onaseasonal basisandsocannot renttheproperty onalong-termbasis (e.g., six-month oroneyearlease). Further, asdiscussed inarecent study conducted bytheMilken Institute onSTRs in 1 Areview oftheHousing Element reveals thattheCitydoesnotappear tomention STRs anywhere inthatdocument. (SeeCityofSantaAnaGeneral PlanHousing Element). Inthesection ofthe atvarious factors influencing
rehabilitation costs, availability offinancing, andrecent trends inforeclosures), governmental factors (landuseregulations, development standards, building codes, permit procedures, andother localpolicies), andenvironmental factors (adequacy ofinfrastructure, public services, andwater 1AlissaDubetz, MattHorton, andCharlotteKesteven, StayingPower: TheEffectsofShort-TermRentalson MILKEN INSTITUTE ( May2022),
https://milkeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/2022-05/Short_Term_Rentals_California.pdf. 10 SantaAnaCityCouncil
November 18, 2024
supply tosupport newdevelopment). (Id. atA-47). Further, andasdiscussed intheMilken Institute longhousing shortage isprimarily caused byfailure tobuildenough housing duetorisingconstruction costs, lengthy permitting times, andcommunity opposition, which disincentivize construction ofaffordable housing. (Dubetz, p. 4.) AsProfessor Betsy Stevenson, theformer ChiefEconomist attheU.S. Department ofLabor andmember ofPresident rs, haswritten, banning STRs infactundermines efforts to Ba
Crisis, BLOOMBERG NEWS (July8, 2024), https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2024-07- 08/banning-airbnb-will-not-make-housing-more-affordable residents torentouttheirhomes canhelpthemrecoup someoftheirinvestment andmake city Ibid.)
decision-making. Because theCitylacksanyjustification foradopting theAmended Ordinance, suchanaction wouldbearbitrary andcapricious. (Strumsky v. SanDiego County Employees Retirement Assn., 11Cal.3d28, 34 (1974); Avenida SanJuanPartnership v. CityofSanClemente, 201Cal.App.4th1256, 1268 (2011).)
5. Theadoption oftheAmended Ordinance would illegally impede on righttoprivacy.
Constitution
Hillv. NCAA
stayintheirhomes. (Coalition Advocating LegalHousing Options v. CityofSanta Monica, 88 These constitutional privacy protections righttohostSTRs and inviteguests into their home. InCoalition Advocating LegalHousing Options, supra, 88 Cal.App.4that454, 459, theCourtofAppeal invalidated alocalordinance thatlimited occupants righttodecidewhomayliveinths
inviteguests intotheirhomes whilethey
would infringe onhosts constitutional righttoprivacy, which includes the righttochoose who canstayinhomes.
TheCityfailstoprovide anysubstantial justification topasstheheightened scrutiny applied to lawsorregulations thatinfringe ontherighttoprivacy andcannot dosobecause STRs haveno demonstrable negative impact ontheCitycompared tootherresidential uses, including long-term rentals.
11 SantaAnaCityCouncil
November 18, 2024
6. Theadoption oftheAmended Ordinance would illegally infringe therighttocontract.
TheOrdinance alsoviolates righttocontract undertheCalifornia constitution, which prohibits lawsimpairing theobligation ofcontracts. (Cal. Const., ArtI, § 9.) 9 andthecourtrequired toevaluate whether
Id. (citations omitted); seealsoCalfarm Ins. Co. v.
Deukmejian, 48Cal. 3d805, 831 (1989).)
RentalAlliance hostshavealready agreed torenttheirproperty onashort-termbasis toguests in upcoming months. Animmediate banonSTRswould invalidate thosecontractual obligations of STRowners inviolation ofthisconstitutional right.
7. Theadoption oftheAmended Ordinance woulddeprive hostsoftheir substantive due process rights.
Termination ofalawful nonconforming useeffects adeprivation ofproperty without dueprocess oflaw, andbanning theabilityofhomeowners torenttheirhome tovisitors morebroadly violates theirsubstantive dueprocess rights undertheCalifornia and U.S. constitutions byinfringing on United States v. Craft, 535U.S. 274, 278 (2002).)
8. Theproposed finesviolate theUnited States Constitution.
Theadministrative finesproposed bytheResolution arealsosoexcessive astoraisefederal constitutional concerns. TheEighthAmendment totheUnited States Constitution forbids theCity fromimposing excessive fines. TheUnited StatesSupreme Courtha oftheconstitutional inquiry undertheExcessive FinesClause istheprinciple ofproportionality:
theamount oftheforfeiture mustbearsomerelationship tothegravity oftheoffense thatitis United States v. Bajakajian, 524U.S. 321, 334 (1998).) HeretheAmended 5,000forathirdviolation failtomeettheprinciple ofproportionality. (See, e.g., Kalthoff v.
Douglas Cnty.,
ofthese fines \[forviolations ofshort-termrental ordinance\] \[ we\]reforseveral thousands ofdollars enforcement offinesonconstitutional grounds).)
12 SantaAnaCityCouncil
November 18, 2024
TheCityHasRefused ToProvide Evidence Surrounding itsTreatment ofSTRsandthe Basis forBanning STRs inViolation oftheCalifornia Public Records Act InApril2024, aPublic Records Actrequest wasfiledwiththeCityinanefforttounderstand what motivated theCity atotalbanonSTRs. Oversixmonthslater, theCityhasstillnot produced aresponse tothePRA. (SeePRA24-715.) TheCityhasresponded toover1,000PRA requestAs such, the
Cityappears tobeconcealing thetruemotivations forseeking tobanallSTRs intheCity. Todate, theCityhasnotprovided anyevidence tosupport itsclaimthatSTRs intheCityhaveanegative impact onpublic health, safety, andwelfare, ifanyevenexists.
Westrongly urgetheCouncil torefrain fromtaking anyaction ontheproposed STRprohibition untiltheCityhasresponded tothePublic Records Actrequest.
Proposed PathForward
WeurgetheCityCouncil torescind thecurrently effective andillegally adopted Ordinance, reject theAmended Ordinance, anddirectStafftoworkwithallstakeholders todevelop anewordinance thatauthorizes STRs tocontinue operating subject toreasonable regulations. Specifically, we recommend establishing an
Thistypeofregulation strikes theappropriate balance whilemaintaining theability ofSTRowners tooperate intheCity.
While theRentalAlliance isreadyandwilling toworkwiththeCity, forthereasons summarized above, should theCityCouncil moveforward withadopting theAmended Ordinance wewill challenge thisaction incourttoprotect rights.
Sincerely,
GAINES & STACEY LLP
AliciaB. Bartley
By
ALICIA B. BARTLEY
cc: JoseMontoya (ViaEmail - jmontoya@santa- ana.org)
AmyHoyt (ViaEmail - [email protected])
Hannah Park (ViaEmail - [email protected])
Attachments
Attachment A CAJAEnvironmental Services, Potential Significant Environmental Effects ofBanning Short-Term Rentals intheCityofSanta andRequirement Require Additional Environmental Analysis Under CEQA, November 14, 2024. 13 AttachmentA
CAJAEnvironmentalServices, Potential
SignificantEnvironmental EffectsofBanning
Short-TermRentalsintheCityofSantaand
Requirement RequireAdditionalEnvironmental
AnalysisUnderCEQA, November14, 2024.
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
o
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
o
o
o
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
o
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
9410Topanga Canyon Blvd., Suite101
Chatsworth, CA91311
Phone310-469-6700Fax 310-806-9801
MEMO
To File
From Eric C. Lu, Sarah Manzano, andBrent Ferren
Subject ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OFSHORT-TERM RENTAL
REGULATION
Date: November 14, 2024 Ramboll Americas Engineering Solutions, Inc. (Ramboll) evaluated potential air quality, greenhouse gas (GHG), energy andnoise environmental impacts ofa potential banonshort-term rentals (STR) inSanta Ana, California. Asdiscussed throughout this memo, Ramboll found thatthebanofSTRs inSanta Anahas the potential toincrease emissions andnoise that should beevaluated further. The increase inemissions andnoise have thepotential tocause asignificant impact in relation toCalifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). RambollÓs analysis was Ramboll informed bytheeconomic analysis performed byRambollÓs Stefanie OÓGorman 250Montgomery St.,
seeExhibit A). Suite1200SanFrancisco,
CA94104 US
1 Overview USA
T+15106557400
Asaresult oftheproposed STR ban, individuals would beunable toenjoy the F+15106559517 benefits ofSTRs within Santa Ana, which will increase demand forlocal hotels as https://ramboll.com theonly option for short term stays within Santa Ana. Asaresult, individuals will beforced totravel greater distances toother commercials centers intheregion tofindavailable STRs andavailable/affordable hotels, introducing additional vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Inparticular, increased travel toandfrom hotels and STRs intheregion because oftheunavailability ofSTR inSanta Anacould increase emissions relative toSouth Coast AirQuality Management District SCAQMD) thresholds for criteria airpollutants ( CAPs), withthepotential tocause short-term andlong-term health impacts tosensitive receptors, exceedances of appliable airquality standards, andinconsistencies withapplicable airquality and climate plans, allofwhich create afair argument ofenvironmental impacts that need tobestudied further under CEQA. ThebanofSTRs will alsolikely result in increased traffic congestion andnoise impacts that require further study under CEQA. 1, 2
1 Airbtics reports approximately 1,000 short-term rentals inSanta Ana, which is referenced throughout this analysis. However, conclusions herein arelargely based on comparative impacts totheelimination ofshort-term rentals and arenotdependent on theactual number ofshort term rentals inSanta Ana today. 2 https://app.airbtics.com/airbnb-data/united-states/CA/santa%20ana 1/14
ÐP
2 HealthImpactsfromCriteriaPollutants
Criteria airpollutants ( CAPs) aredefined aspollutants forwhich thefederal andstate governments have established ambient airquality standards, orcriteria, foroutdoor concentrations toprotect public health. Thefederal andstate standards have been set, withanadequate margin ofsafety, atlevels above which concentrations could beharmful tohuman health and welfare. These standards are designed toprotect the most sensitive people from illness ordiscomfort. Pollutants ofconcern include ozone (3xx O), nitrogen oxides (NO), carbon monoxide ( CO), sulfur oxides (SO), particulate matter less than10microns indiameter (PM), 102. andparticulate matter less than2.5microns5indiameter (PM).
The STR banhas thepotential toincrease emissions ofthese pollutants andtheir health impacts are discussed inthefollowing paragraphs.
Ozone
O3isacolorless gas thatisformed intheatmosphere when volatile organic compounds ( VOCs), sometimes referred toasreactive organic gases (ROG), andoxides ofnitrogen (NO) x react inthe presence ofultraviolet sunlight. O3isnot aprimary pollutant; itisasecondary pollutant formed by complex interactions oftwopollutants directly emitted intotheatmosphere. Theprimary sources of VOCs and NO, X3theprecursors ofO, areautomobile exhaust andindustrial sources. Meteorology and terrain play major roles inO3formation, andideal conditions occur during summer andearly autumn on days withlow windspeeds orstagnant air, warm temperatures, andcloudless skies. Short-term exposures ( lasting forafew hours) toO3atlevels typically observed inSouthern California canresult in breathing pattern changes, reduction ofbreathing capacity, increased susceptibility toinfections, inflammation ofthelungtissue, andsome immunological changes.
Nitrogen Oxides
Most NO, 23likeO, isnot directly emitted intotheatmosphere butisformed byanatmospheric chemical reaction between nitric oxide (NO) andatmospheric oxygen. NOand NO2arecollectively referred toas X32 NO andare major contributors toO formation. Theprimary sources ofNO, theprecursor toNO, include automobile exhaust andindustrial sources. High concentrations ofNO2cancause breathing difficulties andresult inabrownish-redcasttotheatmosphere, causing reduced visibility. There issome indication ofarelationship between NO2andchronic pulmonary fibrosis, andsome increase inbronchitis inchildren (2and3years old) has alsobeen observed atconcentrations below 0.3parts permillion by volume (ppm).
Carbon Monoxide
Carbon Monoxide ( CO) isacolorless andodorless gas formed bytheincomplete combustion offossil fuels. CO isemitted almost exclusively from motor vehicles, power plants, refineries, industrial boilers, ships, aircraft, andtrains. Inurban areas, suchasSanta Ana, automobile exhaust accounts forthe majority ofCOemissions. CO isanon-reactive airpollutant that dissipates relatively quickly; therefore, ambient COconcentrations generally follow thespatial andtemporal distributions ofvehicular traffic. CO concentrations areinfluenced bylocal meteorological conditions, primarily wind speed, topography, and atmospheric stability. COfrom motor vehicle exhaust canbecome locally concentrated when surfacebased temperature inversions arecombined withcalm atmospheric conditions, atypical situation at dusk inurban areas between November and February. Thehighest levels ofCOtypically occur during thecolder months oftheyear when inversion conditions, where alayer ofwarm airsits atopcool air, 2/14
ÐP
are more frequent andcantrappollutants close totheground. Interms ofhealth, COcompetes with oxygen, often replacing itintheblood, thus reducing thebloodÓs ability totransport oxygen tovital organs. Theresults ofexcess COexposure canbedizziness, fatigue, andimpairment ofcentral nervous system functions.
Sulfur Oxides
Sulfur Dioxide (SO) 2 isacolorless, pungent gas formed primarily bythecombustion ofsulfur-containing fossil fuels. The main sources ofSO2arecoal andoilused inpower plants andindustries; assuch, the highest levels22ofSO aregenerally found near large industrial complexes. Inrecent years, SO concentrations have been reduced bytheincreasingly stringent controls placed onstationary source emissions of22SO andlimits placed onthesulfur content offuels. SO isanirritant gas that attacks the throat andlungs andcancause acute respiratory symptoms anddiminished ventilator function in children. SO2canalsoyellow plant leaves anderode ironandsteel.
Particulate Matter
Particulate matter (PM) pollution consists ofvery small liquid andsolid particles floating intheair, which caninclude smoke, soot, dust, salts, acids, and metals. Particulate matter canform when gases emitted from industries and motor vehicles undergo chemical reactions intheatmosphere. PM2.and 510PM represent fractions ofparticulate matter. Fineparticulate matter, orPM, 2.5 isroughly 1/28thediameter ofahuman hair. PM2.5results from fuel combustion ( e.g., motor vehicles, power generation, and industrial facilities), residential fireplaces, and woodstoves. Inaddition, PM2.5canbeformed inthe atmosphere from gases such assulfur oxides (SO), XXNO, and VOCs. Inhalable orcoarse particulate matter, or1010 PM, isabout one- seventh thethickness ofahuman hair. Major sources ofPM include dust stirred upbyvehicles traveling onroads; crushing orgrinding operations; wood-burning stoves andfireplaces; dustfrom construction, landfills, andagriculture; wildfires andbrush/waste burning; industrial sources; windblown dustfrom open lands; andatmospheric chemical andphotochemical reactions.
PM2.and 510PM pose agreater health risk thanlarger-sizeparticles. When inhaled, these tiny particles canpenetrate thehuman respiratory systemÓs natural defenses anddamage therespiratory tract. PM2.5 andPM10canincrease thenumber andseverity ofasthma attacks, cause oraggravate bronchitis and other lungdiseases, andreduce thebodyÓs ability tofightinfections. Very small particles ofsubstances suchaslead, sulfates, andnitrates cancause lungdamage directly orbeabsorbed intothe bloodstream, causing damage elsewhere inthebody. Additionally, these substances cantransport absorbed gases, suchaschlorides orammonium, intothelungs, alsocausing injury. Whereas PM10 tends tocollect intheupper portion oftherespiratory system, PM2.5issotiny thatitcanpenetrate deeper intothelungs anddamage lungtissues. Suspended particulates alsodamage anddiscolor surfaces onwhich they settle, aswell asproduce haze andreduce regional visibility. 3 AnSTRBanWillIncreaseAirPollutantEmissionsandGreenhouseGas Emissions
There areapproximately 1,000active Airbnb listings inSanta Ana. Elimination ofthese Airbnb rentals andother short-term rentals inSanta Anaandthecorresponding increase inguests atSanta Anahotels 3/14
ÐP
would result inanincreased triplength, aspotential guests would have fewer options tostay asclose as possible todaily destinations during their stay inSanta Ana.
Inaddition, thenumber oftrips taken byguests toandfrom their siteofaccommodation would be higher forhotels thanfor short-term rentals, asevidenced byInstitute ofTransportation Engineers ITE), introducing additional vehicle miles traveled. Recreational Homes (ITELand Use Code 260) have anaverage weekday tripgeneration rateof3.55trips per day while the Hotel landuse (ITELand Use 310) has 7.99trips per day. This increase intrips may beduetotheneed toleave thehotel for amenities, such asfood, andincreased worker trips.
Theincrease inmobile emissions associated withshort-term rentals compared tohotels ispresented below inTable 1. Based onpublicly available statistics onthecurrent Airbnb listings inSanta Ana, the 3 average capacity perSTR is5.6people andthere areapproximately 1,000active Airbnb listings. This results inaservice population of5,600people. Asaresult ofthepotential STR ban, this would require 1,867hotel rooms toaccommodate this same service population assuming onehotel room has a capacity of3people. Thenumber ofpeak daily trips was estimated using theITEtriprates forSTRs and hotel rooms andthenumber ofSTRs andhotel rooms required toserve thesame population. The number ofdaily miles traveled was estimated assuming asingle triptoahotel is2miles longer thana single triptoaSTR since guests might have tostay farther from daily destinations ifthey stay ata hotel. These assumptions were used todetermine daily mobile emissions.
Mobile emissions from visitors staying atahotel would generate upto444percent more criteria air 4 pollutant emissions and GHGs thanfrom visitors staying atanSTR. Therefore, thebanhas the potential toconsiderably increase emissions inthearea. Theincrease inVMT andgreenhouse gas emissions isdirectly inconsistent withregional andstate goals toreduce VMT andgreenhouse gas emissions from vehicle trips.
Additional calculation details canbefound inAppendix A.
Table 1. Emissions Increase duetoAdditional VMT
Percent Increase indaily mobile
Criteria AirPollutant emissions from STR tohotel toserve thesame population
VOC 442%
NOx 443%
CO 443%
SOx 444%
PM 10 444%
PM 2.5 444%
GHG (COe) 2 443%
3 https://app.airbtics.com/airbnb-data/united-states/CA/santa%20ana 4 This percent increase isindependent ofthenumber ofshort-term rentals inSanta Ana. The number ofshort-term rentals andpopulation areprovided forillustrative purposes only. 4/14
ÐP
4 AnSTRBanWillDisproportionallyBurdenEnvironmental JusticeCommunities Theproposed STR baninSanta Ana, CA, raises critical environmental justice concerns, particularly given theCityÓs existing pollution burdens from regional pollution andlocalized traffic exposure near the existing hotel stock, andthepotential forincreased hotel usage inresponse torestrictions onSTRs. The existing hotels arepredominately located near theI-5and55freeways onthesoutheastern boundary of theCity. This areashows elevated burden according totheCalifornia Office ofEnvironmental Health Hazard Assessment ( OEHHA) CalEnviroScreen ( CalEnviroScreen 4.0) 5 data. CalEnviroScreen was developed asamapping tool thatidentifies California communities most impacted bypollution andother environmental risks toidentify vulnerability toadverse health effects from those sources.
CalEnviroScreen takes intoaccount environmental andsocioeconomic factors todevelop apercentile of burden across theState ofCalifornia. Factors include indicators ofpollution burden (including ozone, traffic, pesticides, drinking water) andpopulation characteristics ( including asthma, cardiovascular disease, education, poverty), which areeach scored and weighted toderive apollution burden score, population characteristic score, andthefinal CalEnviroScreen score. The Santa Anatracts that border theI-5and55freeways near theSoutheastern boundaries ofthecity areidentified asvulnerable tracts arealsothecurrent locations forthegreatest density ofhotels inSanta Ana.
As shown inFigure 1, the CalEnviroScreen tool identifies Santa Ana, andparticularly thefreewayth adjacent tracts, ashighly burdened, being classified intothe80 percentile andabove forthe CalEnviroScreen overall percentile, withtracts above the90thrd percentile ( Tract 6059074406 93 percentile asthe maximum). This significant elevation inburden isdriven bythepollution andexposure th burden; these freeway-adjacent tracts areranked inthe90 percentile andabove forpollution burden Tract th 6059074003 99 percentile forpollution burden) andfaceextreme burden from airpollution th associated withvehicle traffic emissions, anddirect traffic exposure ( Tract 6059074406 99 percentile fortraffic).
Conversely, while central Santa Anatracts stillregister asoverburdened andpollution-impacted, tracts th inthecenter oftheCity arecomparatively lower burdened andnear the70 percentile foroverall burden.
Further screening tools, the Council onEnvironmental QualityÓs Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEJST), 6
78 the USEPAÓs Environmental Justice Screening and Mapping Tool (EJScreen, Version
2.3), andthePublic Health Alliance ofSouthern CaliforniaÓs California Health Places Index (HPI 3.0), each highlight significant environmental andhealth concerns forSanta Anainalmost alltracts, with traffic proximity andtheassociated vehicle traffic-generated airpollution asthedriving metrics ofthose disadvantage andburden ratings.
5 OEHHA. CalEnviroScreen 4.0. May 2023. Available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/ report/calenviroscreen- 40. 6 Council onEnvironmental Quality. Climate andEconomic Justice Screening Tool. Available at:
https://screeningtool. geoplatform. gov/en/.
7 USEPA. Environmental Justice Screening and Mapping Tool. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/ejscreen. 8 Public Health Alliance ofSouthern California. Healthy Places Index (HPI) 3.0. 2022. Available at:
https://www.healthyplacesindex. org/.
5/14
ÐP
Figure 1. OEHHA CalEnviroScreen 4.0, Santa Ana, CA. Overall Percentile ofExposure andBurden.
InFigure 2, theEJScreen- measured traffic proximity isexpressed asthecounts ofvehicles per day divided bythedistance between thevehicle(s) andtract, providing apercentile rank fortotal exposure.
Thedataincluded demonstrates theextreme disparity forthese near-freeway Santa Anatracts, the same tracts inthe Northeast and Southeast ofSanta Ana where hotels areprimarily located, asthese tracts already experience among the most extreme traffic exposures inthestate andcountry (Figure 2, thetraffic proximity expressed astraffic volume anddistance anddisplayed asstate percentile by tract). These already traffic-exposure overburdened tracts risk further concentration oftraffic from increased hotel useandpotential new hotels (further discussed inSection 7). Therefore, thecongestion andtraffic density increases may bemore impactful tothis already overburdened area. 6/14
ÐP
Figure 2. USEPA Environmental Justice Screening and Mapping Tool, Santa Ana, CA, environmental burden indicator oftraffic proximity.
Theproposed STR could shift visitor accommodations inSTRs from lower-burdened, dispersed residential areas toconcentrated hotel zones insoutheast Santa Ana, where pollution andtraffic emission levels arealready elevated. This shiftinaccommodation location could leadtoincrease vehicular traffic andhotel-generated emissions inanalready-concentrated areafacing significant air pollution exposure levels andhealth risks. Furthermore, theconstruction ofmore hotels inthis areato meet thedemands for visitors duetotheSTR bancould increase emissions from construction and additional operation toanarea withhigher burden. Therelocation ofaccommodations could further the known pollution contributors torespiratory andcardiovascular health risks inthese already overburdened communities.
5 AnSTRBanWouldIncreaseEnergyDemandsBecauseHotelsUseMoreEnergy PerPersonThanSTRs
Theproposed STR bancould cause visitors who would have otherwise stayed inSTRs tostay inhotels, which consume more energy per person than STRs. Using CalEEMod, Ramboll modeled theoperational GHG emissions ofhotels and STRs for comparison. Thesingle-family home CalEEMod landusetype was used asurrogate forSTR. Assuming anoccupancy rateof3people per hotel room and5.6people per STR, hotels have much higher associated GHG emissions per person. Itwas found that hotels consume 7/14
ÐP
more electricity andnatural gas per person than STRs, asshown inTable 2andintheCalEEMod output 9 inAppendix B.
Table 2. Operational Energy UseperPerson
Electricity Natural Gas
Land Use
kWh/yr/person kBTU/yr/person
Hotel6,77313,974
Short Term Rentals 1,2316,846
Asaresult oftheincrease inenergy consumption when staying inahotel instead ofanSTR, GHG emissions from energy consumption per person would increase by179percent. 6 AnSTRBanWillIncreaseFossilFuelUsage
Inaddition, increased VMT would require greater reliance onfossil fuels topower vehicle trips. Even with CaliforniaÓs policies toshiftthevehicle fleettowards cleaner cars andtrucks, vehicle usage will continue torely ongasoline forcar andtruck trips for years tocome. The STR bantherefore results in greater reliance onfossil fuels, inconsistent withregional andstate climate policy. Theestimated fuel useissummarized inTable 3andutilizes thesame assumptions from Table 1. Additional calculation 10 details canbefound inAppendix A.
Table 3. Daily Mobile Fuel Consumption
Gasoline Diesel
Land Use
Gallons perday Gallons perday
Hotels 6,916197
Short Term Rentals 1,27236
Percent Increase with Hotel Use444% 447%
7 AnSTRBanCouldConcentrateTrafficResultinginPotentialNoiseandHealth Impacts
Thepotential banofshort-term rentals inSanta Anacould result inconcentrated traffic onroadways going tohotels inthearea, which could have noise andhealth impacts tothesurrounding landuses. As described above, removing short term rentals asameans forlodging inSanta Ana would result in visitors needing torely onhotels fortheir stay. Currently, there areover 20hotels inthecity limits of Santa Anaandover half ofthem arelocated inoneconcentrated areainthesoutheastern part ofthe City along Highway 55. Itcanbeassumed thatifmore people will need stay inhotels instead ofSTRs, thenthetraffic tothis part oftown would increase significantly asitislikely allofthis traffic would be concentrated totheroadways surrounding thehotel zone area. Incomparison, traffic caused from 9 The CalEEMod analysis isbased on134 dwelling units, which istheamount ofSTRs that would accommodate the same number ofpeople asa250 room hotel. However, theenergy use perperson and percent increase inGHG emission isindependent oftheabsolute number ofshort-term rentals inSanta Ana. 10 The fuel usage isbased on1,000STRs inSanta Ana. However, thepercent increase isindependent ofthenumber ofshort-term rentals inSanta Ana.
8/14
ÐP
visitors traveling toandfrom various STRs located throughout theCity would result inmore diversified traffic patterns asallvisitors arenot driving toonearea. Furthermore, apotential new hotel constructed tomeet thedemand asaresult oftheSTRs ban would likely beconstructed intheareaofSanta Ana withthe majority ofhotels, further concentrating traffic inthis area.
Health Risk Impacts from Traffic
Ramboll performed apreliminary analysis that quantified thehealth risks from traffic emissions inorder toassess theimpact thatincreased hotel useinSanta AnaduetoabanonSTRs could cause. Atypical roadway withapproximately 30,000average annual daily trips (AADT) results inanexcess cancer risk of40 11,12,13 inamillion atanearby residential receptor. According toITE, hotels generate 7.99trips per 14 day per hotel room. There arecurrently approximately 1,000 Airbnbs inSanta Ana, withother STRs 15 alsoavailable. Assuming this bancontributes to950 more hotel rooms being used, traffic would increase by7,560vehicles per day, which results inhealth impacts that would exceed 10inamillion, which istheSCAQMD CEQA threshold ofsignificance for cancer risk. This scaling approach alsodoes not takeintoaccount increased truck traffic associated withdeliveries toahotel that would not occur toan STR. Therefore, banning STRs inSanta Anacould result inanincrease intraffic oncertain roadways that could beconsidered significant. Ifadditional truck trips were taken intoaccount, thenumber of hotel rooms that could cause anexceedance ofthethreshold ofsignificance for cancer risk could be lower than950hotel rooms.
Itcould beassumed that similar trends tocancer risk based onnear-roadway traffic exposure would be truefor particulate matter andtoxic aircontaminant emissions.
Noise Impacts from Traffic
Ramboll evaluated whether apotential traffic volume increase could cause atraffic noise increase thatis considered either substantial ( per CEQA guidelines) orincreases theambient conditions toalevel above theSanta Ana General Plan Noise Element standard (65dBA CNEL).
Traffic noise analyses require specific knowledge ofexisting andfuture traffic volumes andvehicle mixes aswell asproject-related traffic volumes and mixes. Inthis case, this information iscurrently unknown.
However, thefollowing figure shows thecurrent (2022) exterior levels ofnoise created bycars, trucks, ortrains traveling along roadways andrail lines intheCity. The CityÓs noise andlandusecompatibility standards ( see Table N-1) consider exterior levels above 65dBA (CNEL) tobegenerally incompatible for residential andother noise-sensitive landuses.
Ifresidential orother noise-sensitive areas within theCity that arecurrently below the65dBA CNEL level experienced traffic volume increases, specifically duetoanincreased hotel demand resulting from 11 Health impacts obtained from highway 152 from theBayAreaAirQuality Management District (BAAQMD) Mobile Source Screening tool atadistance of100 feet from theroadway. This was used asasurrogate toestimate general health risks from only traffic. The traffic volume along this road was obtained from CalTrans. 12 BayAreaAirQuality Management District (BAAQMD). 2022. CEQA Roadway Screening Tool - Cancer Risk.
Available at: https://data.bayareametro. gov/Environment/ CEQA-Roadway-Screening-Tool-Cancer-Risk/kz4a-ueki 13 CalTrans, Traffic Census Program. Available at: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/traffic-operations/ census. 14 ITE. Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition.
15 https://app.airbtics.com/airbnb-data/united-states/CA/santa%20ana?payment-plan=pro&paymentduration=yearly 9/14
ÐP
theproposed STR ban, andthetraffic volume increase caused theCNEL level tonow exceed 65dBA, theSTR bancould beconsidered tohave caused asignificant impact.
The magnitude ofatraffic noise increase isdependent onseveral factors including thetraffic volume increase, thevehicle mix, andthelocal siteconditions. Based onstandard methodologies prescribed by the Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA) andconsidering avehicle mix typical ofsuburban/ urban areas, traffic volume increases would beexpected toresult inthefollowing traffic noise increases.
Project-specific detailed analysis, including atraffic analysis, would berequired tofurther evaluate.
Nonetheless, thevolume increases listed below suggest thetraffic increases likely necessary toincrease theexisting traffic noise conditions would needtobesignificant.Asshown intheFigure below, the existing hotel stock isintheareanear Highway 55thatiseither already above thenoise standard of65 dBA ornear thestandard. Therefore, adding additional traffic tothis areaduetotheshiftto hotels asa result oftheSTR banortheaddition ofnew hotels totheareahas thepotential toexacerbate the existing noise impacts orcreate anew noise impact. Therefore, this should bestudied inmore detail.
Figure 3.Contours from theNoise Element. Source: Noise Element, Santa Ana General Plan, Final, April 2022.
10/14
ÐP
Table 4. Noise Impact from Traffic Increase
Traffic Volume Increase Potential Traffic Noise Increase 8 EliminationofShort-TermRentalsCouldCausetheConstructionofNewHotels toMeetDemand; theConstructionofNewHotelsWouldResultinNumerous Environmental ImpactsThatRequireStudying
Asdetailed intheRamboll memorandum ÐECONOMICS ANALYSIS OFSHORT-TERM RENTAL REGULATIONÑ, theprohibition ofSTRs, including those currently operating within theCity, could compel tourists toseek alternative accommodations, increasing demand forhotels andpotentially leading tothe development ofadditional hotels asareasonably foreseeable consequence oftheSTR ban. The construction ofhotels has impacts ontheenvironment that have not been studied. Inparticular, construction ofhotels has potential noise andairquality impacts asdiscussed below.
Potential Hotel Construction AirQuality and Health Impacts Resulting from STR Ban Ramboll performed ascreening health risk assessment todetermine thepotential cancer risk resulting from construction activity ofahypothetical new hotel. Theemissions associated withtheconstruction of these hotels encompass on-site, off-roadheavy equipment, off-site, on-roadvehicle travel, architectural coating, paving, andfugitive dust. Ramboll utilized CalEEMod toestimate construction emissions from a 250-room hotel asshown inAppendix B, which isanaverage mid-sizehotel.
Ramboll used anexisting hotel project sitetomodel emissions inAERMOD asasurrogate forthespace ofhotel construction. Concentrations resulting from diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions from offroadconstruction equipment inCalEEMod were modeled onreceptors inagridof20meters. Thehealth 16 risk assessment used default exposure assumptions forresidents asoutlined byOEHHA.
Asindicated inTable 5, theconstruction ofahotel without emissions mitigation results inanexcess cancer risk of48inamillion forthe maximum exposed individual (MEI), which exceeds theSCAQMDÓs threshold of10inamillion. Cancer risks continue toexceed thethreshold until adistance of450feet from theconstruction area.
Table 5. Cancer Risk from Hotel Construction
Source Cancer Risk (inamillion)
Construction ofa250room Hotel 48
SCAQMD Threshold ofSignificance 10
Potential Hotel Construction Noise Impacts Resulting from STR Ban Construction ofstructures generates noise, which isregulated bytheCity ofSanta Ana. 16 OEHHA. 2015. AirToxics HotSpots Program. Risk Assessment Guidelines. Guidance Manual forPreparation of Health Risk Assessments. February.
11/14
ÐP
City ofSanta Ana Noise Element
California Government Code encourages each local government entity toimplement anoise element as part ofitsgeneral plan. Inaddition, theCalifornia GovernorÓs Office ofPlanning and Research has developed guidelines for preparing noise elements, which include recommendations forevaluating the compatibility ofvarious landuses asafunction ofcommunity noise exposure. The City ofSanta Ana 17 has established aNoise Element aspart oftheSanta Ana General Plan. The Noise Element works to ensure thattheCity limits theexposure ofthecommunity toexcessive noise levels innoise-sensitive areas andatnoise-sensitive times ofday. Specifically, theCity has established standards fornoise levels (Community Noise Equivalent Level\[CNEL\],dBA) forlanduses asdisplayed inTable N-1.
Additionally, allresidential uses should beprotected withsound insulation over andabove that provided bynormal building construction when constructed inareas exposed togreater than60dBA CNEL.
Sound levels resulting from aproject that exceed thestandards listed inTable N-1orthat cause the existing conditions toincrease above these standards would typically beconsidered tobeimpacting the surrounding community.
Figure 4. Noise Standards from theNoise Element. Source: Noise Element, Santa Ana General Plan, Final, April 2022.
City ofSanta Ana Noise Ordinance
The City ofSanta Anaregulates noise emissions viatheSanta Ana Municipal Code, specifically Chapter 18 18, Article 6 (Noise Control). Thenoise ordinance establishes thatitisunlawful forany person atany location within theCity ofSanta Anatocreate any noise, ortoallow thecreation ofany noise on property owned, leased, occupied, orotherwise controlled bysuch person, which creates asoundlevel 17 https://www.santa-ana.org/documents/ april-2022-general-plan-noise-element/ 18 https://library.municode.com/ca/santa_ana/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=PTIITHCO_CH18HESA_ARTVINOC O
12/14
ÐP
ataresidential propertythat exceeds thefollowing exterior noise standards. Thenoise levels arebased onacumulative period ofmore than30minutes inany hour.
Table 6. Santa Ana Noise Ordinance
Source: Santa Ana Municipal Code, §18-312.
Noise emissions from oneproperty that propagate ontoanadjacent ornearby residential property and exceed these limits aredeemed tobenoncompliant withtheSanta Ana Municipal Code. Noise emissions related toconstruction activities areexempt from thelimits, provided theconstruction activitiesdo not occurplace between 8:00p.m. and7:00a.m. onweekdays, including Saturday, oratany timeon Sunday orafederal holiday.
Analysis ofNew Hotel Construction
Theeffect ofconstruction noise impacts onnearby noise-sensitiveneighbors isdependent onthe location andnature oftheconstruction activities. Depending ontheconstruction activities and neighboring landuses, there isapotential forpossible significance threshold exceedances related tothe resulting construction activities, particularly inrelation toresidential communities.
While noise from construction activities isexempt from theSanta Ana Municipal Code during daytime hours, noise from construction activities occurring during thenighttime hours (asdetailed inthe previous section) must comply withtheestablished limits. Additionally, thepotential for substantial temporary increases totheexisting ambient conditions could beconsidered relative toCEQA guidelines.
Construction typically involves theuseofheavy machinery that canbeasignificant source ofnoise and, while often temporary, canresult insignificant impacts. Construction equipment commonly includes air compressors, backhoes, concrete trucks, cranes,dump trucks, excavators, graders, pavers, tractors/dozers, vibratory rollers, portable generators, and water trucks. Depending onthephase of construction, project construction typically involves acombination ofthese types ofoff-roadand portable construction equipment. Assuming atypical construction plan, common types ofconstruction equipment, andtypical construction equipment sound levels published byresources such astheU.S.
Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Transit Administration, and manufacturers, potential overall sound levels canbeestimated. Accordingly, construction sound levels could range from approximately 75to90dBA assuming typical receptor distances of500ftto50ft. Construction activities also may need tooccur atnight duetovarious limitations. Examples include concrete pours that needtooccur when other construction isnot happening orwould impede traffic, accelerated construction needs tomeet hotel demand that may come withtheOlympics in2028, roadway construction work that needs tooccur atnighttime.
Thetable below outlines general construction phasing andequipment assumptions employed to estimate approximate sound pressure levels (SPL) for common construction phasesfor ahotel useas 19 generated inCalEEMod. Itisanticipated thatthese sound pressure levels areabove typical 19 California AirPollution Control Officers Association ( CAPCOA). California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod®), Version 2022.1. Available online athttps://www.caleemod.com/ . 13/14
ÐP
suburban/ urban ambient sound levels andtherefore could cause atemporary increase above the threshold discussed above. Forreference, typical suburban/ urban background sound levels are 20 commonly ontheorder of45to55dBA during daytime hours andlower during nighttime hours.
Because sound pressure levels from construction ofanew hotel, which was needed duetoaSTR ban, have thepotential tocause atemporary increase above thenoise level threshold, more analysis is needed toevaluate specific impacts andpotential mitigation. While construction may beexempt from thenoise ordinance during daytime hours, thetable below shows thattheconstruction could have a significant noise impact onthecommunity.
Furthermore, ifany nighttime construction activity isneeded forthehotel, thenoise levels below show thatthreshold fornighttime work inthenoise ordinance would beexceeded.
Table 7. Noise Impacts from Construction Activity
Avg. Equip
Equip Total Total Total
Usage Lmax Acoustical Construction Size, SPL @ SPL @ SPL @ SPL @ Equipment Type Qty Hours SPL @ Use Phase Hp 50ft 50ft 50ft 500 ft
per 50ft Factor
dBA dBA dBA dBA
Day dBA
w 5
t
89 79
D
w
9 D
5 9080
C
D { 87 77
t
t t9ƒ 89
79w
20U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Community Noise, December 31, 1971. 14/
APPENDIX
Confidential
e2
CO 443%
2.5 6
PM
10 PM
x
SO
CO
x
Hotel toserve thesame Population NO 443%443%444%444%444% sions-inventory/msei-modeling-tools
Percent VOCIncrease ofOperational Emissions from STR to 442% rSTR ( umesAirbtics). travel onaverage twoInadditional order onehotel tocompare miles roomtohas STR STR - get short termrentalVOC - avolatile toorganic and capacity compoundsVMT - their Hotel Hotel vehicle ofVMT3compared people. onmilesantraveled toa equivalents. Emissions were determined usingEMFAC2021 emission pandgram permile emission factors foreach pollutant.
5 VMT
Peak Daily miles/day)
4 Trips
Peak Daily one- trips/ wayday) 2
3 Tripstrips/ Rateday)
2 Trip
miles) Distance
1 particulate particulatematter matter less than 2.5microns indiameter less than 10microns indiameter 5,6008.87.9914,915131, x nitrogen 2.510 086 xoxide sulfurcompounds ( oxide compounds NO + NO Population Capacity NOPMPMSO
Unit Hotel Rooms
Quantity
1 5.61,000STRs5,6006.83.553,55024,101 Rate
Population perhotel STRroom) or
Rental Hotel3.01,867
LandShort UseTerm There areapproximately1,000 active short-termrentalswithintheCityofSantaAnaandtheaverage capacity is5.6people peTrip distancesassumeCalEEMod default triplength assumptionsinSantaAna. Forthiscomparison, itisassumed visitorsmustDaily triprate forRecreationalHomes (ITELandUse260) andHotel (ITE LandUse 310). Thenumberofpeakdaily tripswere determined bymultiplying thetriprate bythenumberofSTRsornumberofhotelrooms. The numberofpeakdaily vehiclemiles traveled (VMT) were determined bymultiplying the daily tripsbythe triplength. Thepercent increase from short term rentals compared tohotels were calcuated forcriteria Appendix TableA1: VMTandMobile 1 equivalentpercapita basis, thenumberofhotelrooms required toaccommodate thetotalSTRcapacityEmissions is1,867hotels. 2Thisass short termrental. 3456 Comparisonfactors forOrangeCounty in2027. Thevariationf inthepercent increase between pollutants Short isduetotheratioofgram pertriAbbreviations:CalEEMod - California Term EmissionsEstimatorModelCO - carbonmonoxideCOITE Rentals Institute ofTransportation EngineersReferences: andhttps://app.airbtics.com/airbnb-data/united-states/CA/santa%Hotels 20anaITE. TripGenerationManual11thEdition. California AirResources Board (ARB) 2021. EMFAC20 Appendix Table A2: VMT and Fuel Consumption Comparison ofShort Term Rentals and Hotels 2 1,2 Fuel Consuption Fuel Percent ofFleet gallons per mile) Gasoline95% 0.055
Diesel5% 0.031
Peak Daily VMT 3 Gasoline Consumption Diesel Consumption Land Use miles/day)( gal)(44gal) Short Term Rental24,1011,27236
Hotel131,0866,916197
1Gasoline includes gasoline fueled vehicles andplug-inhybrids. Natural gas isexcluded from this analysis duetothenegligible VMT from natural gas vehicles. 2 Thefleet mix andfuel consumption permileisdetermined using EMFAC2021 forSanta Anain2027.
Thefuel consumption rateisweighted based onfleettype.
3 Thenumber ofpeak daily VMT were determined inAppendix Table A1. 4Gasoline anddiesel consumption arecalculated bymultiplying theVMT bythefuel-specific percentage andthenbythe weighted fuel consumption factor (gal/VMT) derived from EMFAC output.
Abbreviations:
STR - short term rental
VMT - vehicle miles traveled
gal - gallon
References:
California AirResources Board (ARB) 2021. EMFAC2021. Available at: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/ourwork/programs/ mobile-source-emissions- inventory/ msei-modeling-tools
APPENDIX
Confidential
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
1 /4
HotelDetailedReport
1.1.BasicProjectInformation1. 2.LandUseTypes1.3.User-SelectedEmissionReductionMeasuresbyEmissionsSector2. 1.ConstructionEmissionsComparedAgainstThresholds2. 2.ConstructionEmissionsbyYear, Unmitigated2.4.OperationsEmissionsComparedAgainstThresholds2. 5.OperationsEmissionsbySector, Unmitigated3.1.SitePreparation(2026)-Unmitigated3.3.Grading(2026)-Unmitigated3.5.Buildin TableofContents1.BasicProjectInformation2. EmissionsSummary3. ConstructionEmissionsDetails HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
2 /4
4.1.1.Unmitigated4.2.1.ElectricityEmissionsByLandUse- Unmitigated4.2.3.NaturalGasEmissionsByLandUse- Unmitigated4.3.1.Unmitigated4.4.1.Unmitigated4.5.1.Unmitigated4.6.1.Unmitigated4.7.1.U
3.11.ArchitecturalCoating(
StationaryEmissionsByEquipmentType 4.
2027)-Unmitigated4.1.MobileEmissionsbyLandUse4. 2.Energy4.3.AreaEmissionsbySource4. 4.WaterEmissionsbyLandUse4. 5.WasteEmissionsbyLandUse4. 6.RefrigerantEmissionsbyLandUse4. 7 HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
3 /4
4.8.1.Unmitigated4.9.1.Unmitigated4.10.1.SoilCarbonAccumulationByVegetationType- Unmitigated4.10.2.AboveandBelowgroundCarbonAccumulationbyLandUseType- Unmitigated4.10.3.AvoidedandSequesteredEmissionsby Species-Unmitigated5.2.1.Unmitigated5.3.1 ConstructionEarthmovingActivities4.9.UserDefinedEmissionsByEquipmentType4.10.SoilCarbonAccumulationByVegetationType5.1.ConstructionSchedule5.2.Off-RoadEquipment5.3.ConstructionVehicles5.4.Vehicles5..ArchitecturalCoatings5.6 DustMit igation
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
4 /4
5.10.1.1.Unmitigated
5.6.2.ConstructionEarthmovingControlStrategies5. 9.1.Unmitigated5.10.1.Hearths5.10.2.ArchitecturalCoatings5. 10.3.LandscapeEquipment5. 11.1.Unmitigated5.12.1.Unmitigated5.13.1.Unmitigate ted5.7.ConstructionPaving5.8.ConstructionElectricityConsumptionandEmissionsFactors5.9.OperationalMobileSources5.10.OperationalAreaSources5.11.OperationalEnergyConsumption5.12 HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
5 /4
5.18.1.1.Unmitigated5.18.1.1.Unmitigated5.18.2.1.Unmitigated
5.15.1.Unmitigated5.16.1.EmergencyGeneratorsandFirePumps5. 16.2.ProcessBoilers5. 18.1.LandUseChange5. 18.1.BiomassCoverType5. 18.2.Sequestration
5.15.OperationalOff- RoadEquipment5. 16.StationarySources5. 17.UserDefined5. 18.Vegetation6.1.ClimateRiskSummary6. 2.InitialClimateRiskScores6. 3.AdjustedClimat
6.ClimateRiskDetailedReport
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
6 /4
7.1.CalEnviroScreen4. 0Scores7.2.HealthyPlacesIndexScores7. 3.OverallHealth& EquityScores7.4.Health&EquityMeasures7. 5.EvaluationScorecard7. 6.Health&EquityCustomMeasures
7.HealthandEquityDetails8. UserChangestoDefaultData
Description
Population
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
SpecialLandscapeArea( sqft)
LandscapeArea(sqft)
ValueHotel1/1/20262027ÏProject/ site2.5018.6SantaAna,CA,USAOrangeSantaAnaSouthCoastAQMDSouthCoast59907SouthernCaliforniaEdisonSouthernCaliforniaGas2022. 1.1.29 7 /4
BuildingArea(sqf
LotAcreage
Unit
Size
DataFieldProjectNameConstructionStartDateOperationalYearLeadAgencyLandUseScaleAnalysisLevelforDefaultsCountyWindspeed( m/s)Precipitation(days)LocationCountyCityAirD 00ÏÏÏ1.BasicProjectInformation 1..BasicProjectInformation1.2 CO2eCO2e
RR
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
CO2TCO2T
NBCO2NBCO2
BCO2BCO2
PM2.5TPM2.5T
PM2.5DPM2.5D
PM2.5EPM2.5E 8 /4
PM10TPM10T
PM10DPM10D
PM10EPM10E
SO2SO2
COCO
NOxNOx
250Space2. ROGROG 30100,0000.00
TOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTOG EnclosedParkingwithElevatorUn/ Mit.Daily,Summer(Max)Unmit.17117112.924.40.040.403.193.590.370.781.14Ï7,3107,3100.250.4515.07,464Daily,Winter(Max)Unmit.14.74.8016889.60.812.6950.353.02.5918.621.2Ï118,090118,0908.7317.95.92123, 638AverageDaily( Max)Unmit.9.899.7813.818.10.050.373.884.240.341.261.60Ï7,8607,8600.400.766.638, 104Annual( Max)Unmit.1.801.792.523.300.010.070.710.770.060.230.29Ï1,3011,3010.070.131. 101,342Year1.3.User-SelectedEmissionReductionMeasuresbyEmissionsSectorNomeasuresselected 2.EmissionsSummary2.1.ConstructionEmissionsComparedAgainstThresholds CriteriaPollutants( lb/dayfordaily, ton/yrforannual)andGHGs(lb/dayfordaily, MT/yrforannual)2.2.ConstructionEmissionsb ÏCO2e
ÏR
ÏN2O
HotelDetailedReport,
ÏCH4
11/13/2024
ÏCO2T
ÏNBCO2
ÏBCO2
ÏPM2.5T
ÏPM2.5D
ÏPM2.5E 9 /4
ÏPM10T
ÏPM10D
ÏPM10E
ÏSO2
ÏCO
ÏNOx
ÏROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTOGÏÏÏÏ
Daily-Summer(Max)20262.141.7812.924.40.040.403.193.590.370.781.14Ï7,3107,3100.250.4515.07,464202717117112.323.70.040.353.193.540.330.781.10Ï7,2237,2230.240.4313.57,371Daily-Winter(Max)202614.74.80168 89.60.812.6950.353.02.5918.621.2Ï118,090118,0908.7317.95.92123,63820272.061.6312.422.40.040.353.193.540.330.781.10Ï7,1047,1040.240.430.357,239AverageDaily20261.861.3413.818.10.050.373.884.240.341.26160Ï7,8607,8600.400.766.638,10420279.899.783.115.630.010.090.730.820.080.180.26Ï1,6711,6710.060.101.321,702AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ20260.340.252.523.300.010.070.710.770.060.230.29Ï1,3011,3010.070.131101,34220271.801.790.571.03<0.0050.020.130.150.020.030.05Ï2772770.010.020.22282Un/Mit.Daily,Summer( Max)Unmit.12.612.22.9822.50.020.250.000.250.240.000.2485.98,6518,7379.420.105679,568Daily, Winter( Max)Unmit.9.028.872.822.360.020.210.000.210.210.000.2185.98,5688,6549.410. 105679, 485AverageDaily(Max) 2.4.OperationsEmissionsComparedAgainstThresholds CriteriaPollutants( lb/da CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
CO2T
NBCO2
BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
10 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ
Unmit.11.511.12.9316.20.020.240.000.240.230.000.2385.98,6258,7119.420.105679,542Annual( Max)Unmit.2.092.030.532.95<0.0050.040.000.040.040.000.0414.21,4281,4421.560.0293.91,580SectorDaily,Summer(Max)Mobile0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Area12.312.00.1720.1<0.0050.04Ï0.040.03Ï0.03Ï82.882.8<0.005<0.005Ï83.1Energy0.310.152.822.360.020.21Ï0.210.21Ï0.21Ï8,5278,5270790.07Ï8,566WaterÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ12.240.953.11.250.03Ï93.3WasteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ73.80.0073.87.370.00Ï258Refrig.ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ567567Total12.612.22.9822.50.020.250.000.250.240.000.2485.98,6518,7379.420.105679,568Daily, Winter( Max)Mobile0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Area8.718.71ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏEnergy0.310.152.822.360.020.21Ï0.210.21Ï0.21Ï8,5278,5270.790.07Ï8,566WaterÏÏ ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ12.240.953.11.250.03Ï93.3WasteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ73.80.0073.87.370.00Ï258Refrig.ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ567567Total9.028.872.822.360.020.210.000.210.210.000.2185.98,5688,6549.410. 105679,485AverageDaily2.5.OperationsEmissionsbySector, Unmitigated CriteriaPollutants( lb/dayfordaily, ton/yrforannual)andGHGs(lb CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
CO2T
NBCO2
BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
11 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
TOGÏÏÏ
Mobile0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Area11.211.00.1213.8<0.0050.02Ï0.020.02Ï0.02Ï56.756.7<0.005<0.005Ï56.9Energy0.310.152.822.360.020.21Ï0.210.21Ï0.21Ï8,5278,5270.790.07Ï8,566WaterÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ12.240.953.11.250.03Ï93.3WasteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ73.80.0073.87.370.00Ï258Refrig.ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ567567Total11.511.12.9316.20.020.240.000.240.230.000.2385.98,6258,7119.420.105679,542AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏMobile0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Area2.042.000.022.52<0.005<0.005Ï<0.005<0.005Ï<0.005Ï9.399.39<0.005<0.005Ï9.42Energy0.060.030.510.43<Max)0.Daily, 0050.04Ï0.040.04Ï0.04Ï1,4121,4120.130.01Ï1,418WaterÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ2.016.Winter(788.Max) 790. 3. 21<0.005Ï15.4WasteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ12.20.0012.21.220.00Ï42.7Refrig.ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ93.993.9Total2.092.030.532.95<0.0050.040.000.040.040.000.0414.21,4281,4421.560.0293.91,580LocationOnsiteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily, Summer( ConstructionEmissionsDetails3.1.SitePreparation(2026 5,316
Ï
0.04 0.21
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
5,298
5,298
Ï
1.14 Ï
12 1.14
1.24 Ï
1.24 0.05
28.8 29.2
3.14 3.74ÏÏÏÏÏÏ20.320.3Ï10.210.2ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.100.090.800.79<0.0050.03Ï0.030.03Ï0.03Ï1451450.01<0.005Ï146ÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.560.56Ï0.280.28ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.000.000.000 Off-RoadEquipmDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff- RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOff- RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckOffsiteDai ly,Summer( ÏCO2e
ÏR
ÏN2O
ÏCH4
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
ÏCO2T
ÏNBCO2
ÏBCO2
ÏPM2.5T
ÏPM2.5D
ÏPM2.5E 13
ÏPM10T
ÏPM10D
ÏPM10E
ÏSO2
ÏCO
ÏNOx
ÏROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ1. 961 Daily,Winter(Max)Worker0.060.060.060.800.000.000.230.230.000.050.05Ï217217<0.0050.010.02219Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling10.91.5913960.00.761.4529.731.21.458.349.78Ï112,575112,5758.5117.85.90118,102AverageDailyWorker< 0.005<0.005<0.0050.020.000.000.010.010.00<0.005<0.005Ï6.026.02<0.005<0.0050.016.10Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00000Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.300.043.851.630.020.040.810.850.040.230.27Ï3,0843,0840.230.492.693,238AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏWorker< 0.005<0.005<0.005<0.0050.000.00<0.005<0.0050.00<0.005<0.005Ï1001.00<0.005<0.005<0.0051.01Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.050.010.700.30<0.0050.010.150.150.010.040.05Ï5115110.040.080.45536LocationOnsiteÏÏÏÏÏÏ ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily, Summer(Max)Daily,Winter(Max)Off- RoadEquipment3.3.Grading(2026)- Unmitigated CriteriaPollutants( lb/dayfordaily, to Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
Ï
Ï
Ï
3.42 3.42
14 Ï
7.08 7.08
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.160.141.231.43<0.0050.05Ï0.050.05Ï0.05Ï2432430.01<0.005Ï244ÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.580.58Ï0.280.28ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ DustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff- RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOff- RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily, Summer(Max)Daily,Winter(M CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
CO2T
NBCO2
BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
15 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ1. 281.079.8513.00.020.38Ï0.380.35Ï0.35Ï2,3972,3970.100.02Ï2,4050.000.000.000 Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00AverageDailyWorker< 0.005<0.005<0.0050.060.000.000.020.020.00<0.005<0.005Ï15.515.5<0.005<0.0050.0215.7Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000. 00.00AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏWorker< 0.005<0.005<0.0050.010.000.00<0.005<0.0050.00<0.005<0.005Ï2.562.56<0.005<0.005<0.0052.60Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00LocationOnsiteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily,Summer(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckDaily,Winter( Max)Off-RoadEquipment3.5.BuildingConstruction( 2026)-Unmitigated CriteriaPollutants( lb/dayfo HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
16 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.770.655.967.840.010.23Ï0.230.21Ï0.21Ï1,4501,4500.060.01Ï1,4550.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ OnsitetruckAverageDailyOff- RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOff- RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily, Summer(Max)Worker0.670.660.5910.20.000.002.542.540.000.600.60Ï2,5322,5320.030.098.802,569Vendor0.190.052.421.210.020.020.650.670.020.180.20Ï2,3802,3800.120.346.152,489Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.00.000.00Daily,Winter(Max)Worker0.670.660.688.840.000.002.542.540.000.60 CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
CO2T
NBCO2
BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
17 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
TOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ1. 231.039.3912.90.020.34Ï0.340.31Ï0.31Ï2,3972,3970.100.02Ï2,4050.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.0 005Ï522Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏWorker0.070.070.071.010.000.000.280.280.000.060.06Ï245245<0.0050.010.38248Vendor0.020.010.280.14<0.005<0.0050.070.07<0.0050.020.02Ï2382380.010.030.27249Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00LocationOnsiteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily, Summer(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsi tetruckDaily, Winter(Max)Off- RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff-RoadEquipment3.7.BuildingConstruction(2027)-Unmitigated CriteriaPollutants( lb/dayfordaily, ton/yrforannual)andGHG HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
18 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.000.050.040.370.51<0.0050.01Ï0.010.01Ï0.01Ï86.286.2<0.005<0.005Ï86.5 00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ OnsitetruckAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOff- RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily, Summer( Max)Worker0.650.560.589.620.000.002.542.540.000.600.60Ï2,4902,4900.030.097.892,526Vendor0.180.052.331.160.020.020.650.670.020.180.20Ï2,3362,3360.120.325.592,440Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.00.00Daily, Winter(Max)Worker0.650.550.608.270.000.002.542.540.000.600.60Ï2,3692,3690030.090.212,398Vendor0.180.052.431.180.020.020.650.670.020.180.20Ï2,3372,3370.120.320.142,435Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000 CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
CO2T
NBCO2
BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
19 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
TOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0. 790.666.098.830.010.24Ï0.240.22Ï0.22Ï1,3501,3500.050.01Ï1,3550.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0. 040.040.330.48<0.0
0.005ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOnsitetruck3.9.Paving(2027)- 00LocationOnsiteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily, Summer( Max)Unmitigated Off- CriteriaPollutants( RoadEquipmentPaving0.300. lb/dayfordaily, 30ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOnsitetruckDaily, Winter(Max)AverageDailyOff- ton/ RoadEquipmentPaving0.20. yrforannual)andGHGs( 02ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOnsitetruckAnnua lb/lÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOff-RoadEquipmentPaving< dayfordaily, 0.005< CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
CO2T
NBCO2
BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
20 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ OffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Worker0.070.060.060.990.000.000.260.260.000.060.06Ï256256<0.0050.010.81260Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Daily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyWorker<0.005<0.005<0.0050.050.000.000.010.010.00<0.005<0.005Ï13.513.5<0.005<0.0050.0213.7Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏWorker<0.005<0.005<0.0050.010.000.00<0.005<0.0050.00<0.005<0.005Ï2.242.24<0.005<0.005<0.0052.27Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Location OnsiteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily, Summer(Max) Off-RoadEquipment3.11.ArchitecturalCoating(2027)-Unmitigated CriteriaPollutants Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
21 Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
171
1710.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0. 010.010.050.06<0.005<0.005Ï<0.005<0.005Ï<0.005Ï7.327.32<0.005<0.005Ï7.349.369.36ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000. 00<0.005<0.0050.010. 01<0.005<0.005Ï<0.005<0.005Ï<0.005 00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ ArchitecturalOnsitetruckDaily, Winter(Max)AverageDailyOff- RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatingsOnsitetruckAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOff- RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatingsOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily, Summer(Max)Worke CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
CO2T
NBCO2
BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
22 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ
Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Daily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyWorker0.010.010.010.090.000.000.030.030.000.010.01Ï26.326.3<0.005<0.0050.0426.7Vendor0.000.000000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏWorker< 0.005<0.005<0.0050.020.000.000.010.010.00<0.005<0.005Ï4.364.36<0.005<0.0050.014.41Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00LandUseDaily, Summer(M 846.OperationsEmissionsDetails4.1.MobileEmissionsbyLandUse 4.1.1.UnmitigatedMobilesourceemissionsresultsarepresentedinSections2.6.Nofurtherdetailedbreakdownofemissionsisavailable.4.2.Energy4.2.1.Electr 352CO2e
ÏR
0.005N2O
0.03CH4
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
350CO2T
350NBCO2
ÏBCO2
ÏPM2.5T
ÏPM2.5D
ÏPM2.5E 23
ÏPM10T
ÏPM10D
ÏPM10E
ÏSO2
ÏCO
ÏNOx
ÏROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ3503500. 03<0.005Ï352ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ58. 058.00.01<0.005 EnclosedTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ5, 1685,1680.490.06Ï5,198Daily,Winter(Max)HotelÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ4,8184,8180.460.06Ï4,846EnclosedParkingwithElevatorTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ5, 1685,1680.490.06Ï5,198AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ HotelÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ7987980.80.01Ï802EnclosedParkingwithElevatorTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ8568560.80.01Ï861LandUseDaily, Summer( Max)Hotel0.310.152.822.360.020.21Ï0.210.21Ï0.21Ï3,3593,3590.300.01Ï3 368EnclosedPa rkingwithElevator4.2.3
CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
CO2T
NBCO2
BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
24 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.00Ï0.00Ï0.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.00 Total0.310.152.822.360.020.21Ï0.210.21Ï0.21Ï3,3593,3590.300.01Ï3,368Daily,Winter(Max)Hotel0.310.152.822.360.020.21Ï0.210.21Ï0.21Ï3,3593,3590.300.01Ï3,368EnclosedParkingwithElevatorTotal0. 310.152.822.360.020.21Ï0.210.21Ï0.21Ï3,3593,3590.300.01Ï3,368AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏHotel0. 060.030.510.43<0.0050.04Ï0.040.04Ï0.04Ï5565560.05<0.005Ï558EnclosedParkingwithElevatorTotal0. 060.030.510.43<0.0050.04Ï0040.04Ï0.04Ï5565560.05<0.005Ï558SourceDaily,Summer(Max)ConsumerProducts 4.3.AreaEmissionsbySource4.3.1.UnmitigatedCriteriaPollutants( lb/dayf Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
25 Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
0.94 0.943.583.310.1720.1<0.0050.04Ï0.040.03Ï0.03Ï82.882.8<0.005<0.005Ï83.1ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ7.787.78ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.940.94ÏÏÏÏÏÏ 42 ArchitecturalCoatingsLandscapeEquipmentTotal12.312.00.1720. 1<0.0050.04Ï0.040.03Ï0.03Ï82.882. 8<0.005<0.005Ï83.1Daily,Winter(Max)ConsumerProductsArchitecturalCoatingsTotal8.7 CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
CO2T
NBCO2
BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
26 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
TOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0. 000.000.000.000.00Ï0.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ LandUseDaily, Summer(Max)HotelÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ12.240.953.11.250.03Ï93.3EnclosedParkingwithElevatorTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ12. 240.953.11.250.03Ï93.3Daily,Winter(Max)HotelÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ12.240.953.11.250.03Ï93.3Enclo
44..WaterEmissionsbyLandUse 4.4.1.UnmitigatedCriteriaPollutants( lb/dayfordaily, ton/yrforannual) andGHGs(lb/dayfordaily,M CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
CO2T
NBCO2
BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
27 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
TOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0. 000.000.000.000.00Ï0.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ LandUseDaily, Summer(Max)HotelÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ73.80.0073.87.370.00Ï258EnclosedParkingwithElevatorTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ73. 80.0073.87.370.00Ï258Daily,Winter(Max)HotelÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ73.80.0073.87.370.00Ï258Enclo
74.5.WasteEmissionsbyLandUse 4.5.1.UnmitigatedCriteriaPollutants( lb/dayfordaily, ton/yrforannual) andGHGs(lb/dayfordaily,M RR
CO2eCO2e
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
CO2TCO2T
NBCO2NBCO2
BCO2BCO2
PM2.5TPM2.5T
PM2.5DPM2.5D
PM2.5EPM2.5E 28
PM10TPM10T
PM10DPM10D
PM10EPM10E
SO2SO2
COCO
NOxNOx
ROGROG
TOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ
TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ4.6.RefrigerantEmissionsbyLandUse 4.6.1. LandUseDaily, Summer(Max) UnmitigatedCriteriaPollutants( lb/ HotelÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ567567TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ567567Daily, dayfordaily, ton/ Winter(Max) yrforannual) HotelÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ567567TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ567567AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏHotelÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ93. andGHGs(lb/dayfordaily,MT/yrforannual)4.7.OffroadEmissionsByEquipmentType 4.997.3.1 9TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ93.93.9EquipmentTypeDaily, Summer(M ÏCO2eCO2e
ÏRR
ÏN2ON2O
ÏCH4CH4
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
ÏCO2TCO2T
ÏNBCO2NBCO2
ÏBCO2BCO2
ÏPM2.5TPM2.5T
ÏPM2.5DPM2.5D
ÏPM2.5EPM2.5E 29
ÏPM10TPM10T
ÏPM10DPM10D
ÏPM10EPM10E
ÏSO2SO2
ÏCOCO
ÏNOxNOx
ÏROGROG
ÏTOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTOG
Daily,Winter(Max)TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏEquipmentTypeDaily, Summer(Max)TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily,Winter(Max)TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ ÏÏÏÏÏTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏEquipmentType 4.8.StationaryEmissionsByEquipmentType 4.8.1.UnmitigatedCriteriaPollutants( lb/dayfordaily, ton/yrforannual) andGHGs( lb/dayfordaily,MT/yrforannual)4.9.UserDefinedEmissionsByEquipmentType 4.9.1 CO2eCO2e
RR
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
CO2TCO2T
NBCO2NBCO2
BCO2BCO2
PM2.5TPM2.5T
PM2.5DPM2.5D
PM2.5EPM2.5E30
PM10TPM10T
PM10DPM10D
PM10EPM10E
SO2SO2
COCO
NOxNOx
ROGROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTOG Daily,Summer(Max)TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily,Winter(Max)TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏVegetationDaily, ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏLandUse 4.10.SoilCarbonAccumulationByVegetationType 4.10..SoilCarbonAccumulationByVegetationType- Summer(Max)TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily, UnmitigatedCriteriaPollutants( lb/Winter( dayfordaily, ton/ Max)Total yrforannual)andGHGs( lb/dayfordaily,MT/yrforannual)4.10.2 CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
CO2T
NBCO2
BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
31 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ Daily,Summer(Max)TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily,Winter(Max)TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏSpeciesDaily, AvoidedSubtotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ4.10.3. Summer(Max)AvoidedSubtotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏSequesteredSubt AvoidedandSequesteredEmissionsbySpecies- otalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏRemovedSubtotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily, Winter( UnmitigatedCriteriaPollutants(M lb/dayfordaily, to
Ï
Ï
PhaseDescription
Ï
Ï
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
Ï
WorkDaysperPhase
Ï
Ï
Ï
DaysPerWeek
Ï
32 Ï
EndDate Ï
Ï
Ï
StartDate
Ï
Ï
Ï
PhaseType
Ï
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ
SequesteredSubtotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏRemovedSubtotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏAvoidedSubtotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏSequesteredSubtotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏRemovedSubtotalÏ 0020.Ï5.ActivityData5.1.ConstructionSche
LoadFactor
VehicleMix
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
Horsepower
HoursPerDay
MilesperTr
NumberperDay
33 One-WayT
EngineTier
FuelTypeDieselAverage4. 008.0084.00.37DieselAverage3. 008.0084.00.37DieselAverage3. 007.0084.00.3 TripType
EquipmentTypehoeshoeshoesMixershoes
PhaseNameSitePreparationRubberTiredDozersDieselAverage3. 008.003670.40SitePreparationTractors/ Loaders/BackGradingExcavatorsDieselAverage1. 008.0036.00.38GradingGradersDieselAverage1. 008.001480.41Gradin gRubberTiredDozersDieselAverage1.008.003670.40GradingTractors/Loaders/BackBuildingConstructionCranesDieselAverage1.007.003670.29BuildingConstructionForkliftsDieselAverage3.008.0082.0.20BuildingConstructionGeneratorSetsDieselAverage1.008.0014.00.74BuildingConstructionTractors/ Loaders/BackBuildingConstructionWeldersDieselAverage1.008.0046.00.45PavingPaversDieselAverage1.008.0081.00.42PavingPavingEquipmentDieselAverage2.006.0089.00.36PavingRollersDieselAverage2.006.0036.00.38PavingCementandMortarPavingTractors/Loaders 0037.00.48PhaseNam 5.2.1.Unmitigated 5.3.ConstructionVe HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
34 ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ
SitePreparationSitePreparationWorker17. 518.5LDA,LDT1,LDT2SitePreparationVendorÏ10. 2HHDT,MHDTSitePreparationHauling1, 64220.0HHDTSitePreparationOnsitetruckÏÏHHDTGradingGradingWorker15. 018.5LDA,LDT1,LDT2GradingVendorÏ10.2HHDT,MHDTGradingHauling0.020.0HHDTGradingOnsitetruckÏÏHHDTBuildingConstructionBuildingConstructionWorker19418.5LDA,LDT1,LDT2BuildingConstructionVendor75.910 MHDTArchitecturalCoatingHauling0.0020.0HHDTArchitecturalCoatingOnsitet ParkingAreaCoated( sqft) AcresPaved(acres)
N2O
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
Non-ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated( sqft) MaterialDemolished( sq.ft.)% Asphalt CH4
Non-ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated( sqft) AcresGraded(acres) 35 CO2
ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated( sqft) MaterialExported( CubicYards) AreaPaved(acres) kWhperYea
ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated( sqft) MaterialImported( CubicYards) 005 5.4.1.ConstructionVehicleControlStrategiesNon-applicable.Nocontrolstrategiesactivatedbyuser.5.. PhaseNameArchitecturalCoating0. ArchitecturalCoatings5.6. 000.00549,008182,DustMitigation 0016, 5.6.1. 011PhaseNameSitePreparation0. 00131, ConstructionEarthmovingActivities5.6.37315. 2. 00.00ÏGrading0.000.0090.00.00ÏPaving0. ConstructionEarthmovingControlStrategiesNon- 000.applicable. 000. Nocontrolstrategiesactivatedbyuser.5. 000.002.30LandUseHotel0. 7.ConstructionPaving5. 000%EnclosedParkingwithElevator2.8 301
VMT/Year
NaturalG
ParkingAreaCoated( sqft)
VMT/Sunday
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
VMT/SaturdayValueN2O
Non-ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated( sqft)
VMT/Weekday
CH4
36 Trips/Year
Non-ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated( sqft)
Trips/SundayUnitCO2
Trips/Saturday
ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated( sqft)
Electrici
Trips/Weekday
20270.005320.03<0.005LandUseTypeTotalallLandUses0. 000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated( sqft) 00.00549,008182,0016,011SeasonSnowDaysday/ yr0.00SummerDaysday/ yr250LandUs
5.9.OperationalMobileSources5.9.1.Unmitigated 5.10.OperationalAreaSources5.10.1.Hearths5.10.1.1.Unmitigated5.10.2.ArchitecturalCoatings5. 10.3.LandscapeEquipment 5.11.OperationalEnergyConsumption5.11.1.Unmitigate TimesServiced
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
ServiceLeakRate
OutdoorWater(gal/year) Cogeneration(kWh/year)
OperationsLeakRate
Quantity(kg)
37 GWP
IndoorWater(gal/year) Waste(ton/year)
RefrigerantR-134a1,4300.00
369,1433460.03300.00400.00
EquipmentTyperefrigeratorsand/ orfreezersandheatpumpsandfreezers Hotel5,079,7143460.03300.004010,480,427EnclosedParkingwithElevatorLandUseHotel6, 341,6930.00EnclosedParkingwithElevator0. 000.00LandUseHotel137ÏEnclosedParkingwithElevator0. 00ÏLandUseTypeHotel inrefrigerators5.12.OperationalWaterandWastewaterConsumption 5.12.1.Unmitigated5.13.OperationalWasteGeneration 5.13.1.Unmitigated5.14.OperationalRefrigerationandAirConditioningEquipment5.14.1.
LoadFactorLoadFactor
AnnualHeatInput( MMBtu/yr)
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
FinalAcres
HorsepowerHorsepower
DailyHeatInput(MMBtu/day) FinalAcre
HoursPerDayHoursperYear
BoilerRating(MMBtu/hr)FuelTypeInitialAcres
38 NumberperDayHoursperDay
NumberInitialAcres
EngineTierNumberperDay
VegetationSoilType
FuelType
FuelTypeFuelType
EquipmentTypeEquipmentTypeEquipmentTypeEquipmentTypeVegetationLandUseTypeBiomassCoverTy
5.15.OperationalOff-RoadEquipment5.15.1.Unmitigated 5.16.StationarySources5.16.1.EmergencyGeneratorsandFirePumps5. 16.2.ProcessBoilers5.17.UserDefined5.18.Vegetation5.18.1.LandUseChange5. 18.1.1.Un mitigated5.18..BiomassCoverT 7miles(mi)by3.7mi. VulnerabilityScore
ouldbelighttomoderaterainfallif etal.,2017,CEC-500-2017-008),and rise, derRCP8. 0.5meter,5), 1.andconsiderhistoricaldata 0meter,1.41meters oncentrationPathway( RCP)8.5which Averageconditions( CanESM2),Ran HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024 ymaximum/minimumtemperaturesfrom ncrementsofsealevelrisecoupledwith ialwildfireprobabilitiesforthegridcell. T NaturalGasSaved( btu/year)
Unit
AdaptiveCapacityScor
ElectricitySaved( kWh/year)
39 SensitivityScore
ResultforProjectLocation
Number
Expo
TreeTypeClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeat9. 03annualdaysofextremeheatExtremePrecipitation3. 50annualdayswithprecipitationabove20mm A5.18.2.Sequestration5.18.2.1.Unmitigated 6.ClimateRiskDetailedReport6.1.ClimateRiskSummaryCal-Adaptmidcentury2040Î2059averageprojectionsforfourhazardsarereportedbelowforyourprojectlocation. Theseare underRepresentationCassumesGHGemissionswillcontinuetorisestronglythrough2050andthenplateauaround2100.TemperatureandExtremeHeatdataareforgridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Theprojectionisbasedonthe9 8thhistoricalpercentileofdailobservedhistoricaldata(32climatemodelensemblefromCal-Adapt,2040Î2059averageunderRCP8.5). Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3ExtremePrecipitationdataareforthegridcellin whichyourprojectarelocated.Thethresholdof20mmisequivalenttoabout¾aninchofrain,whichwreceivedoverafulldayorheavyrainifreceivedoveraperiodof2to4hours.Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.SeaLevelRisedataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromRadkeetal.(2017),asreportedinCal-Adapt(RadkeconsiderinundationlocationanddepthfortheSanFranciscoBay, theSacrame nto-SanJoaquinRiverDeltaandCaliforniacoastresultingdifferentiextremestormevents.Usersmayselectfromfourscenariostoviewtherangeinpotentialinundationdepthforthegridcell.Thefourscenariosare:NoWildfiredataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromUCDavis,asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040Î2059averageunofclimate,vegetation,populationdensity,andlarge(>400ha)firehistory.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentfoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer/drier(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-MIROC5). CM5),differentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities( Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km VulnerabilityScore
1to5,withascoreof5representingthe1to5, withascoreof5representingthe HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024 udeimplementationofclimateriskreduction plementationofclimateriskre tedonascaleof1to5, withascoreof5tedonascaleof1to5, withascore AdaptiveCapacityScore
40 SensitivityScore
100N/A000N/AExposureScore1
WildfireFloodingN/AN/AN/AN/ADroughtN/AN/AN/AN/ASnowpackReductionN/ AN/AN/AN/AAirQualityDegradationClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationN/ AN/AN/AN/ASeaLevelRise1112WildfireFlooding N/AN/AN/AN/ADroughtN/AN/AN/AN/ASnowpackReductionN/AN/AN/AN/ AAirQualityDegradation Thesensitivityscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleofgreatestexposure. Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectreferstoitsabilitytomanage andreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards. Adaptivecapacityisrarepresentingthegreatestabilitytoadapt. Theoverallvulnerabilityscoresarecalculatedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityas sessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresdonotinclmeasures.6.3.AdjustedClimateRiskScores Thesensitivityscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonasc aleofgreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectreferstoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisrarepresentingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilityscoresarecalculatedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Sco estate.
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
ResultforProjectCensusTractÏ57. 073.578.346.577.70.0087.544.2Ï94.80.000.0066.7Ï55.545.888.097.988.796.992.849.9 41 IndicatorExposureIndicatorsAQ- OzoneAQ-PMAQ-DPMDrinkingWaterLeadRiskHousingPesticidesToxicReleasesTrafficEffectIndicatorsCleanUpSitesGroundwaterHazWasteFacilities/ Generators86.4ImpairedWaterBodiesSoli dWasteSensitivePopulationAsthmaC vascularLowBirthWeightsSocioeconomicFactorIndicatorsÏEducationHousingLinguisticPovertyUnemployment7.1.CalEnviroScreen4.0Scores ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100. Ahighscore(i.e.,greatertha actsinthestate.
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
ResultforProjectCensusTractÏ5. 4151161349.839599645.838573078Ï10.6120877710045.81034262Ï2.66906197993.17336071Ï61.863210574.401385859Ï16.2710124535.8141922296.3557038494.2512511220.51841396Ï5.80007699 24. 516874118
45IndicatorEconomicAbovePovertyEmployedMedianHIEducationBachelor' sorhigherHighschoolenrollmentPreschoolenrol increnterseverehousingcostburden43.07712049.2.HealthyPlacesIndexScores ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore( i.e HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
1.680995765Ï1.86064416854.349.458.087.614.811.995.739.745.17.314.819.994.317.3Ï57.09.30.00.0 43 UncrowdedhousingHealthOutcomesInsuredadultsArthritisAsthmaERAdmissionsHighBloodPressureCancer( excludingskin)AsthmaCoronaryHeartDisease23. 5ChronicObstructivePulmonaryDisease17. 9DiagnosedDiabetesLifeEx pectancyatBirthCognitivelyDisabledPhysically DisabledHeartAttackERAdmissions78. 5MentalHealthNotGoodChronicKidneyDiseaseObesityPedestrianInjuriesPhysicalHealthNotGood7. 3StrokeHea tractsinthestate. thestate.
HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
0.569.31.393.321.655.323.0Ï96.6Ï31.1ResultforProjectCensusTract 44 ChildrenElderlyEnglishSpeakingForeign- bornOutdoorWorkersClimateChangeAdaptiveCapacityÏImperviousSurfaceCover11. 1TrafficDensityTrafficAccessOtherIndicesHardshipOtherDecisionSupport2016VotingMetricCalE nviroScreen4. 0ScoreforProjectLocation(a)90.0HealthyPlacesIndexScoreforProjectLocation(b)12.0ProjectLocatedinaDesig AssemblyBill617)No7.3.OverallHealth&EquityScoresa:ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100.Ahighscore( i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinb:ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.A highscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensus7.4.Health&EquityMeasuresNoHealth&EquityMeasuresselected.7 HotelDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
JustificationMorereflectiveofSantaAnaLotAcreage
45 ScreenConstruction:ConstructionPhasesremoveddemolition.LandUseConstruction: DustFromMaterialMovementMorerepresentat
7.6.Health&EquityCustomMeasuresNoHealth&EquityCustomMeasurescreated.8.UserChangestoDefaultData SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
1 /5
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport
1.1.BasicProjectInformation1. 2.LandUseTypes1.3.User-SelectedEmissionReductionMeasuresbyEmissionsSector2. 1.ConstructionEmissionsComparedAgainstThresholds2. 2.ConstructionEmissionsbyYear, Unmitigated2.4.OperationsEmissionsComparedAgainstThresholds2. 5.OperationsEmissionsbySector, Unmitigated3.1.Demolition(2026)-Unmitigated3 UnmitigatedTableofContents1.BasicProjectInformation2. EmissionsSummary3.
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
2 /5
4.1.1.Unmitigated4.2.1.ElectricityEmissionsByLandUse- Unmitigated4.2.3.NaturalGasEmissionsByLandUse- Unmitigated4.3.1.Unmitigated4.4.1.Unmitigated4.5.1.Unm
3.11.BuildingConstruction( 2028)-Unmitigated3.13.BuildingConstruction( 2029)-Unmitigated3.15.Paving(2029)-Unmitigated3.17.ArchitecturalCoating( 2029)-Unmitigated4.1.MobileEmissionsbyLandUse4. 2.Energy4.3AreaEmissionsbySource4. 4.WaterEmissionsbyLandUse
4.OperationsEmissionsDetails
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
3 /5
4.7.1.Unmitigated4.8.1.Unmitigated4.9.1.Unmitigated4.10.1.SoilCarbonAccumulationByVegetationType- Unmitigated4.10.2.AboveandBelowgroundCarbonAccumulationbyLandUseType- Unmitigated4.10.3.AvoidedandSeque ConstructionVehicleControlStrategies4.7.OffroadEmissionsByEquipmentType4.8.StationaryEmissionsByEquipmentType4.9.UserDefinedEmissionsByEquipmentType4.10.SoilCarbonAccumulationByVegetationType5.1.ConstructionSchedule5.2.Off-RoadEquipmen t5.3.ConstructionVehicles5.
4.Vehicles
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
4 /5
5.10.1.1.Unmitigated
5.6.1.ConstructionEarthmovingActivities5. 6.2.ConstructionEarthmovingControlStrategies5. 9.1.Unmitigated5.10.1.Hearths5.10.2.ArchitecturalCoatings5. 10.3.LandscapeEquipment5. 11.1.Unmitigated5.12.1 igated 5..ArchitecturalCoatings5.6.DustMitigation5.7.ConstructionPaving5.8.ConstructionElectricityConsumptionandEmissionsFactors5.9.OperationalMobileSources5.10.OperationalAreaSources5.11.OperationalEnergyCons SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
5 /5
5.18.1.1.Unmitigated5.18.1.1.Unmitigated5.18.2.1.Unmitigat
5.13.1.Unmitigated5.14.1.Unmitigated5.15.1.Unmitigated5.16.1.EmergencyGeneratorsandFirePumps5. 16.2.ProcessBoilers5. 18.1.LandUseChange5. 18.1.BiomassCoverType5. 18.2.Sequestration
5.14.OperationalRefrigerationandAirConditioningEquipment5. 15.OperationalOff- RoadEquipment5. 16.StationarySources5. 17.UserDefined5. 18.Vegeta
6.ClimateRis
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
6 /5
6.2.InitialClimateRiskScores6. 3.AdjustedClimateRiskScores6. 4.ClimateRiskReductionMeasures7. 1.CalEnviroScreen4. 0Scores7.2.HealthyPlacesIndexScores7. 3.OverallHealth& EquityScores7.4.Health&EquityMeasure s7.5.EvaluationScorecard7.6.Health& EquityCustomMeasures7.HealthandEquityDetails8.
Description
Population
SpecialLandscapeArea( sqft)
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
LandscapeArea(sqft)
ValueSingleFamilyResidence1/ 1/20262027ÏProject/ site2.5018.6SantaAna,CA,USAOrangeSantaAnaSouthCoastAQMDSouthCoast59907SouthernCaliforniaEdisonSouthernCaliforniaGas2022. 1.1.29 7 /5
BuildingArea(sqf
LotAcreage
Unit
Size13
DataFieldProjectNameConstructionStartDateOperationalYearLeadAgencyLandUseScaleAnalysisLevelforDefaultsCountyWindspeed( m/s)Precipitation(days)LocationCountyCityAirDistrictAirBasinTAZEDFZElectricUtilit yGasUtilityAppVersionLandUseSubtypeSingleFamilyHousing1.BasicProjectInformation 1..BasicProjectInformation1.2 CO2eCO2e
RR
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
CO2TCO2T
NBCO2NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport,BCO2BCO2 11/13/2024 PM2.5TPM2.5T
PM2.5DPM2.5D
PM2.5EPM2.5E 8 /5
PM10TPM10T
PM10DPM10D
PM10EPM10E
SO2SO2
COCO
NOxNOx
ROGROG
TOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ
ParkingLot134Space1. 210.000.00ÏÏÏUn/Mit.Daily,Summer(Max)Unmit.30.230.129.229.70.061.2419.921.11.1410.211.3Ï6,8596,8590.270.113.346,885Daily,Winter(Max)Unmit.30.230.129.229.60.051.2419.921.11.1410.211.3Ï5,5155,5150.220.110.095, 536AverageDaily( Max)Unmit.5.105.0013.815.40.030.563.824.370.511.662.17Ï3,3363,3360.130.070.933, 355Annual( Max)Unmit.0.930.912.522.810.010.100.700.800.090.300.40Ï5525520.020010.15555YearDaily- Summer( Max) 1.3.User-SelectedEmissionReductionMeasuresbyEmissionsSectorNomeasuresselected 2.EmissionsSummary2.1.ConstructionEmissionsComparedAgainstThresholds CriteriaPollutants( lb/dayfordaily, ton/yrforannual) andGHGs(lb/dayfordaily,MT/yrforannual)2..ConstructionEmissionsbyYear, Unmitigated CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
CO2T
NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024 BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
9 /5
PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ
20263.803.2029.229.70.061.2419.921.11.1410.211.3Ï6,8596,8590.270.113.346,88520271.431.189.9815.50.030.340.751.090.310.180.49Ï3,4563,4560.130.103.013,49220281.371.139.4715.40.030.300.751.060.280.180.46Ï3,4353,4350.130.082.703,465202930.230.19.1115.20.030.280.751.030.260.180.44Ï3,4133,4130.130.082.403,443Daily-Winter( Max)20263.803.2029.229.60.051.2419.921.11.1410.211.3Ï5,5155,5150.220.110.095,5362 0271.431.1810.0015.20.030.340.751.090.310.180.49Ï3,4263,4260.130.100.083,46020281.371.139.5115.10.030.300.751.060.280.180.46Ï3,4063,4060.130.100.073,440202930.230.19.1314.90.030.280.751.030.260.180.44Ï3,3843,3840.130.100.063,418AverageDaily20261.871.5813.815.40.030.563.824.370.511.662.17Ï3,3363,3360.130.050.563,35520271.020.847.1610.90.020.240.530.770.220.130.35Ï2,4532,4530.090.070.932,47820280.980.816.8110.90.020.220.530.750.200.130.33Ï2,4452,4450.090.070.842,47020295.105.003.986.540.010.130.280.410.120.070.18Ï1,3611,3610.050.040.381,373AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ20260.340.292.522.810.010.100700.800.090.300.40Ï5525520.020.010.0955520270.190.151.311.99<0.0050.040.100.140.040.020.06Ï4064060.010.010.1541020280.180.151.241.98<0.0050.040.100.140.040.020.06Ï4054050.020.010.1440920290.930.910.731.19<0.0050.020.050.070.020.010.03Ï2252250.010.10.06227Un/Mit.Dai 081.876,93424
CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
CO2T
NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
10 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ
Daily,Winter(Max)Unmit.45.041.14.0868.70.189.670.009.679.500.009.501,3725,1226,49415.70.081.876,914AverageDaily( Max)Unmit.9.348.981.5410.40.020.760.000.760.750.000.752032,9023,10512.20.041.873,425Ann ual(Max)Unmit.1.701.640.281. 90<0.0050.140.000.140.140.000.1433.64805142.020.010.31567SectorDaily, Summer( Max)Mobile0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Area45.641.72.8575.80.179.57Ï9.579.39Ï9.391,2552,4193,6743.740.05Ï3,781Energy0.150.081.300.550.010.10Ï0.100.10Ï0.10Ï2,5662,5660.230.01Ï2,576WaterÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ9.641581671.000.03Ï200WasteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ1070.0010710.70.00Ï375Refrig.ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ1.871.87Total45.741.84.1576.30.189.670.009.679.500.009.501,3725,1436,51515.70.081.876,934Daily,Winter(Max)Mobile0.0 230.01Ï2,5762.5.OperationsEmissionsbySector, Unmitigated CriteriaPollutants( lb/dayfordaily CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
CO2T
NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024 BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
11 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTOG
WaterÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ9.641581671.000.03Ï200WasteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ1070. 0010710.70.00Ï375Refrig.ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ1.871.87Total45.041.14.0868.70.189.670.009.679.500.009.501,3725,1226,49415.70.081.876,914AverageDail yMobile0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Area9.198.900.249.880.010.66Ï0.660.65Ï0.6586.01782640. 26<0.005Ï272Energy0.150.081.300.550.010.10Ï0.100.10Ï0.10Ï2,5662,5660.230.01Ï2,576WaterÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ9.641581671.000 020.10.31567LocationOnsiteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ3.ConstructionEmissionsDetails3.1.Demolitio SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
12 ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ2. 722.2920.719.00.030.84Ï0.840.78Ï0.78Ï3,4273,4270.140.03Ï3,438ÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.000.00Ï0.000.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.370.312.832. 60<0.0050.12Ï0.120.11Ï0.11Ï46946 000.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ Daily,Summer(Max)Daily,Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentDemolitionOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff- RoadEquipmentDemolitionOnsitetruckAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOff- RoadEquipmentDemolitionOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily, CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
CO2T
NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024 BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
13 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ3. 743.1429.228.80.0 Daily,Winter(Max)Worker0.050.050.050.680.000.000.200.200.000.050.05Ï186186<0.0050.010.02188Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00AverageDailyWorker0.010.010.010.100.000.000.030.030.000.010.01Ï25.825.8<0.005<0.0050.0426.2Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏWorker< 0.005<0.005<0.0050.020.000.00<0.005<0.0050.00<0.RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovement 005< 3.0.. 005Ï4.274.27<0.005<0.0050.01SitePreparation( 4.2026)- 33Vendor0.000.000.000.000.Unmitigated 000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00LocationOnsiteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily, Summer Max) CriteriaPollutants( Off- lb/dayfordaily, to
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, Ï 11/13/2024
0.00 0.00
14 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ3.743.1429.228.80.051.24Ï1.241.14Ï1.14Ï5,2985,2980.210.04Ï5,316ÏÏÏÏÏÏ19.719.7Ï10.110.1ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ ÏÏÏ0.310.262.402. 37<0.0050.10Ï0.100.0 000.00 OnsitetruckDaily, Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff- CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
CO2T
NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024 BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
15 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ
OffsiteDaily,Summer(Max)Worker0.060.060.050.920.000.000.230.230.000.050.05Ï228228<0.0050.010.79231Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Daily,Winter( Max)Worker0.060.060.060.800.000.000.230.230.000.050.05Ï217217<0.0050.010.02219Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00AverageDailyWorker< 0.005<0.0050.010.070.000.000.020.020.00<0.005<0.005Ï18.118.1<0.005<0.0050.0318.3Vendor0 000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏWorker< 0.005<0.005<0.0050.010.000.00<0.005<0.0050.00<0.005<0.005Ï2.992.99<0.005<0.005<0.0053.03Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.00.000.000. 000.00LocationOnsiteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily,Summer(Max) 3.5.Grading(2 6,621
Ï
0.05 0.27
6,599
6,599
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, Ï 11/13/2024
1.03 Ï
16 1.03
1.12 Ï
1.12 0.06
27.6 27.2
3.04 3.62ÏÏÏÏÏÏ9.209.20Ï3.653.65ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0. 740.635.595.670.010.23Ï0.230.21Ï0.21Ï1,3561,3560.060.01Ï1,361ÏÏÏÏÏÏ1.891.89Ï0.750.75ÏÏ Off-RoadDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckDaily, Winter(Max)AverageDailyOff- RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruckAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOff- RoadEquipmentDustFromMaterialMovementOnsitetruc ÏCO2e
ÏR
ÏN2O
ÏCH4
ÏCO2T
ÏNBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, ÏBCO2 11/13/2024
ÏPM2.5T
ÏPM2.5D
ÏPM2.5E 17
ÏPM10T
ÏPM10D
ÏPM10E
ÏSO2
ÏCO
ÏNOx
ÏROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ1. 281.079.8513.00.020.38Ï0.380.35Ï0 Daily,Summer(Max)Worker0.070.070.061.050.000.000.260.260.000.060.06Ï260260<0.0050.010.91264Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Daily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyWorker0.010.010.010.190.000.000.050.050.000.010.01Ï51.651.6<0.005<0.0050.0852.3Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏWorker< 0.005<0.005<0.0050.040.000.000.010.010.00<0.005<0.005Ï8.558.55<0.005<0.0050.018. RoadEquipmentOnsitetruck3. 66Vendor0. 7. 000.000.000.000.000.000. BuildingConstruction( 000.000.2026)- 000.000.00Ï0.Unmitigated 000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00LocationOnsiteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ ÏDaily,Summer(Max) CriteriaPollutants( Off- lb/dayford SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
18 ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ1.281.079.8513.00.020.38Ï0.380.35Ï0.35Ï2,3972,3970.100.02Ï2,4050.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.360.302.803.680.010.11Ï0.110.10Ï0.10Ï6806800.030.01Ï6830 Daily,Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff- RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOff- RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily, Summer(Max)Worker0.170.160.152.540.000.000.630.630.000.150.15Ï6286280.010.022.18637Vendor0.040.010.460.23<0.005<0.0050.120.13<0.0050.030.04Ï4494490.020.061.16470Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Daily,Winter CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
CO2T
NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024 BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
19 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ1. 231.039.3912.90.020.34Ï0.340.31Ï0.31Ï2,3972,3970.100.02Ï2,4050.000.000.000 Vendor0.030.010.480.23<0.005<0.0050.120.13<0.0050.030.04Ï4504500.020.060.03469Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00AverageDailyWorker0.050.050.050.650.000.000.180.180.000.040.04Ï172172<0.0050.010.27174Vendor0. 01<0.0050.140.07<0.005<0.0050.030.04<0.0050.010.01Ï1281280.010.020.14133Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏWorker0.010.010.010.120.000.000.030.030.000.010.01Ï28.528.5<0.005<0.0050.0428.8Vendor< 0.005<0.0050.020.01<0.005<0.0050.010.01<0.005<0.005<0.005Ï21.121.1<0.005<0.0050.0222.0Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00LocationOnsiteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily,Summer(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckDaily,Winter( Max)Off-RoadEquipment3.9.BuildingConstruction( 2027)-Unmitigated CriteriaPollutants( lb/dayfo SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
20 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.880.746.719.240.020.24Ï0.240.22Ï0.22Ï1,7121,7120.070.01Ï1,7180.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ OnsitetruckAverageDailyOff- RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOff- RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily, Summer(Max)Worker0.160.140.142.390.000.000.630.630.000.150.15Ï6186180.010.021.96627Vendor0.030.010.440.22<0.005<0.0050.120.13<0.0050.030.04Ï4414410.020.061.05461Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.00.000.00Daily,Winter(Max)Worker0.160.140.152.050.000.000.630.630.000.1 CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
CO2T
NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport,BCO211/13/2024
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
21 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
TOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ1. 180.998.9212.90.020.30Ï0.300.28Ï0.28Ï2,3972,3970.100.02Ï2,4060.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.0 723Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏWorker0.020.020.020.280.000.000.080.080.000.020.02Ï70.570.5<0.005<0.0050.1071.4Vendor<0.005<0.0050.060.03<0.005<0.0050.020.02<0.005<0.005<0.005Ï52.252.2<0.0050.010.0554.4Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00LocationOnsiteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily, Summer(Max)Off RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckDaily, Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff- RoadEquipment3.11.BuildingConstruction(2028)- Unmitigated CriteriaPollutants( lb/dayfordaily, ton/yrforannual) andGHGs(lb SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
22 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.000.150.131.171.69<0.0050.04Ï0.040.04Ï0.04Ï2842840.01<0.005Ï2850.0 ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ OnsitetruckAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOff- RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily, Summer( Max)Worker0.160.130.122.250.000.000.630.630.000.150.15Ï6076070.01<0.0051.75609Vendor0.030.010.420.21<0.005<0.0050.12 0.13<0.0050.030.04Ï4314310.20.060.95450Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.00.00Daily, Winter(Max)Worker0.160.130.151.930.000.000.630.630.000.150.15Ï5775770.010.02005584Vendor0.030.010.440.22<0.005<0.0050. 120.13<0.0050.030.04Ï4314310.020.060.02450Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000 CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
CO2T
NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, BCO2 11/13/2024
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
23 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
TOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ1. 150.978.5812.90.020.28Ï0.280.25Ï0.25Ï2,3972,3970.100.02Ï2,4050.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ1.150.978.5812.90.020.28Ï0.280.25Ï0.25Ï2,3972,3970.1
0.005Ï125 LocationOnsiteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily, Summer(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckDaily, Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff- RoadEquipmentOnsitetruckAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOff-RoadEquipment3.13.BuildingConstruction( 2029)-Unmitigated CriteriaPollutants( lb/dayfordaily, ton/yrforannual)andGHGs(lb/ CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
CO2T
NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024 BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
24 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTOG OnsitetruckOffsiteDaily, Summer(Max)Worker0.150.130.122.120.000.000.630.630.000.150.15Ï5965960.01<0.0051.56599Vendor0.030.010.400.20<0.005<0.0050.120.13<0.0050.030.04Ï4194190.020.060.85439Hauling0.000 000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Daily,Winter(Max)Worker0.150.130.121.820.000.000.630.630.000.150.15Ï5685680.010.020.04575Vendor0.030.010.420.21<0.005<0.0050.120.13<0.0050.030.04Ï4204200.020.060.02438Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00AverageDailyWorker0.050.040.040.6 000.000.00LocationOnsiteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ3.15.Paving
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, Ï 11/13/2024
Ï
Ï
25 Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï0.800.676.469.920.010.24Ï0.240.22Ï0.22Ï1,5111,5110.060.01Ï1,5160.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0. 120.100.971.49<0.0050.04Ï0.040.03Ï0.03Ï2282280. 01< 00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ Daily,Summer( Max)Off-RoadEquipmentPaving0.60.06ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOnsitetruckDaily, Winter(Max)AverageDailyOff-RoadEquipmentPaving0.10.01ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOnsitetruckAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOff- RoadEquipmentPaving< 0.005<0.005ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOnsitetruckOffsiteDaily,Summ CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
CO2T
NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024 BCO2
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
26 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0. 120.100.791.11<0.0050.01Ï0.010.01Ï0.01Ï1 00Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Daily,Winter(Max)AverageDailyWorker0.010.010.010090.000.000.030.030.000.010.01Ï27.027.0<0.005<0.0050.0327.3Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏWorker< 0.005<0.005<0.0050.020.000.000.010.010.00<0.005<0.005Ï4.464.46<0.005<0.Max)Off- 0050. RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatingsOnsitetruck 014.52Vendor0.000.000.000.000. 3.000.000.17. 000.000.000.ArchitecturalCoating( 000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00LocationOnsiteÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily, 2029)- Summer( Unmitigated CriteriaPollutants( lb SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
27 ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.120.100.791.11<0.0050.01Ï0.010.01Ï0.01Ï1341340.01<0.005Ï13430.030.0ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.020.020120.17<0.005<0.005Ï<0.005<0.005Ï<0.005Ï20.120.1<0.005<0.005Ï20.24.524.52ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00< 0.005<0.0050.020.03<0.005<0.005Ï<0.00 Daily,Winter(Max)Off-RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatingsOnsitetruckAverageDailyOff- RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatingsOnsitetruckAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏOff- RoadEquipmentArchitecturalCoatingsOnsitetruc SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
28 ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ
Daily,Summer(Max)Worker0.030.030.020.420.000.000.130.130.000.030.03Ï119119<0.005<0.0050.31120Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Daily,Winter(Max)Worker0.030.030.020.360.000.000.130.130.000.030.03Ï114114<0.005<0.0050.01115Vendor0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00Hauling0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.000.000.000.000.00AverageDailyWorker<0.005<0.005<0.0050.060.000.000.020.020. 00<0.005<0.005Ï17.317. 3<0.005<0 000.04.OperationsEmissionsDetails4.1.MobileEmissionsbyLandUse 4.1.1.UnmitigatedMobilesourceemissionsresultsarepresentedinSections2.6.Nofurtherdetailedbreakdownofemissionsisavailable.4 CO2e
R
N2O
CH4
CO2T
NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, BCO2 11/13/2024
PM2.5T
PM2.5D
29 PM2.5E
PM10T
PM10D
PM10E
SO2
CO
NOx
ROG
TOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ8768760. 080.01Ï881ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ43. 643.6<0.005<0.005Ï43.9ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ876
0.005Ï153 4.2.27LandUseDaily, Summer(Max) 1.SingleFamilyHousingParkingLotTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ9209200.90.01Ï925Daily, ElectricityEmissionsByLandUse-Winter( UnmitigatedCriteriaPollutants( Maxlb/dayfordaily, ton/yrforannual)andGHGs(lb/dayfordaily, MT/yrforannual)4.2 RR
CO2eCO2e
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
CO2TCO2T
NBCO2NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, BCO2BCO2 11/13/2024 PM2.5TPM2.5T
PM2.5DPM2.5D
PM2.5EPM2.5E 30
PM10TPM10T
PM10DPM10D
PM10EPM10E
SO2SO2
COCO
NOxNOx
ROGROG
TOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.150.081.300.550.010.10Ï0.100.10Ï0.10Ï1,6461,6460.15<0.005Ï1,6510.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.00Ï0.00Ï0.000.000.000.00Ï0.00ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.150.081.300.550.010.10Ï0.100.10Ï010Ï1,6461,6460.15<0.005Ï1,6510.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.00Ï0.00Ï0.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.030.010.240.10<0.0050.02Ï0.020.02Ï0.02Ï2732730.02<0.005Ï2730.000.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.000.00Ï0.00Ï0.000.000000.00Ï0.00TOG LandUseDaily, Summer(Max)SingleFamilyHousingParkingLotTotal0. 150.081.300.550.010.10Ï0.100.10Ï0.10Ï1,6461,6460.15<0.005Ï1,651Daily,Winter(Max)SingleFamilyHousingParkingLotTotal0. 150.081.300.550.010.10Ï0.100.10Ï0.10Ï1,6461,6460. 15<0.005Ï1,651AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏSingleFamilyHousingParkingLotTotal0.030.010.240. 10<0.0050.02Ï0.020.02Ï0.02Ï2732730. 02<0. 005Ï273Source4.3.AreaEmissionsbySource 4.3.1 Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, Ï 11/13/2024
Ï
Ï
31 Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï
Ï5.605.60ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.450.45ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.700.670.077.61<0.005<0.005Ï<0.005<0.005Ï<0.005 ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ Daily,Summer( Max)Hearths38.835.02.7868.10.179.57Ï9.579.39Ï9.391,2552,3983,6533.740.5Ï3,761ConsumerProductsArchitecturalCoatingsLandscapeEquipmentTotal45.641.72.8575.80.179.57Ï9.579.39Ï9.391,2552,4193,6743.740.05Ï3,781Daily, Winter(Max)Hearths38.835.02.7868.10.179.57Ï9.579.39Ï9.391,2552,3983,6533.740.05Ï3,761ConsumerProductsArchitecturalCoatingsTotal44.941.12.7868.10.179.57Ï9.579.39Ï9.391,2552,3983,6533.740.05Ï3,761AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏHearths0.490.440.030.85<0.0050.12Ï0.120.12Ï0.1214.227.241.40.04< ÏCO2e
ÏR
ÏN2O
ÏCH4
ÏCO2T
ÏNBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, ÏBCO211/13/2024
ÏPM2.5T
ÏPM2.5D
ÏPM2.5E 32
ÏPM10T
ÏPM10D
ÏPM10E
ÏSO2
ÏCO
ÏNOx
0.08ROG
0.080.090.080.010.95<0.005<0.005Ï<0.005<0.005Ï<0.005Ï2.302.30<0.005<0.005Ï2.31TOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ9. 641581 ArchitecturalLandscapeEquipmentTotal1. 681.620.041.80<0.0050.12Ï0.120.12Ï0.1214.229.543.70.04<0.005Ï45.0LandUseDaily,Summer(Max)SingleFamilyHousingParkingLotTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ9. 641581671.000.03Ï200Daily Winter(Max)SingleFamilyHou
4.4.WaterEmissionsbyLandUse4.4.1.UnmitigatedCriteriaPollutants( lb/dayfordaily,ton/yrforannual)andGHGs(lb
33.1CO2e
ÏR
0.005N2O
0.17CH4
27.7CO2T
26.1NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 1.60BCO211/13/2024 ÏPM2.5T
ÏPM2.5D
ÏPM2.5E 33
ÏPM10T
ÏPM10D
ÏPM10E
ÏSO2
ÏCO
ÏNOx
ÏROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.00TOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ1070. 0010710.70.00Ï375ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.0 SingleFamilyHousingParkingLotTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ1. 00Ï375AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ4.5. 6026.127. WasteEmissionsbyLandUse70. 4.17<5.0.. 005Ï33.1LandUseDaily, Summer(Max)SingleFamilyHousingParkingLotTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ1070. UnmitigatedCriteriaPollutants( 0010710. lb/ 70.00Ï375Daily,Winter(Max)SingleF dayfordaily, ton/yrforannual) andGHGs(l
62.1CO2e
ÏR
0.00N2O
1.77CH4
17.8CO2T
0.00NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 17.8BCO211/13/2024 ÏPM2.5T
ÏPM2.5D
ÏPM2.5E 34
ÏPM10T
ÏPM10D
ÏPM10E
ÏSO2
ÏCO
ÏNOx
ÏROG
ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ0.000.000.000.000.00Ï0.00TOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ SingleFamilyHousingParkingLotTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ17. 80.0017.81.770.00Ï62.1LandUseDaily, Summer(Max)SingleFamilyHousingTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ1. 871.87Daily,Winter(Max)SingleFamilyHousingTo 314.6.RefrigerantEmissionsbyLandUse 4.6.1.UnmitigatedCriteriaPollutants( lb/dayfordaily, ton/yrforannual) andGHGs(l CO2eCO2e
RR
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
CO2TCO2T
NBCO2NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, BCO2BCO2 11/13/2024 PM2.5TPM2.5T
PM2.5DPM2.5D
PM2.5EPM2.5E 35
PM10TPM10T
PM10DPM10D
PM10EPM10E
SO2SO2
COCO
NOxNOx
ROGROG
TOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ
4.7.OffroadEmissionsByEquipmentType4.7.1.UnmitigatedCriteriaPollutants( EquipmentTypeDaily, lb/dayfordaily, Summer(Max) ton/TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily, yrforannual)Winter( andGHGs( Max)lb/TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏEquipmentTypeDaily, dayfordaily,MT/yrforannual) 4.8.StationaryEmissionsByEquipmentType4.8.1.UnmitigatedCr Summer(Max)TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily,Winter(Max) iteriaPollutants( Tlb CO2eCO2e
RR
N2ON2O
CH4CH4
CO2TCO2T
NBCO2NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, BCO2BCO2 11/13/2024 PM2.5TPM2.5T
PM2.5DPM2.5D
PM2.5EPM2.5E 36
PM10TPM10T
PM10DPM10D
PM10EPM10E
SO2SO2
COCO
NOxNOx
ROGROG
TOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ
AnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏEquipmentTypeDaily, TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ4.9.UserDefinedEmissionsByEquipmentType 4.9.1.UnmitigatedCriteriaPollutants( lb/ Summer(Max) dayfordaily,TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily, ton/Winter( yrforannual) Max)andGHGs( TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏVegetationDa lb/dayfordaily,MT/yrforannual)4.10.SoilCarbonAccumulationByVegetationType 4.10.ily,Summer(M ÏCO2eCO2e
ÏRR
ÏN2ON2O
ÏCH4CH4
ÏCO2TCO2T
ÏNBCO2NBCO2
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, ÏBCO2BCO2 11/13/2024 ÏPM2.5TPM2.5T
ÏPM2.5DPM2.5D
ÏPM2.5EPM2.5E 37
ÏPM10TPM10T
ÏPM10DPM10D
ÏPM10EPM10E
ÏSO2SO2
ÏCOCO
ÏNOxNOx
ÏROGROG
ÏTOGÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTOG
Daily,Winter(Max)TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏTotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏLandUseDaily, AvoidedSubtotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏSequestered 4.10.2.Summer(AboveandBelowgroundCarbonAccumulationbyLandUseType- Max)TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily, UnmitigatedCriteriaPollutants( lb/ Winter(Max) dayfordaily, ton/ TotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏT yrforannual)andGHGs(lb/dayfordaily,MT/yrforannual)4.10.3otalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏSpeciesDaily, Summer(Max)A SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
38 ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ SubtotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏRemovedSubtotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏDaily, Winter(Max)AvoidedSubtotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏSequester ÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏAnnualÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏAvoidedSubtotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏSequesteredSubtotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏRemovedSubtotalÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏÏ5 LoadFactor
PhaseDescription
Horsepower
WorkDaysperPhase
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024 HoursPerDay DaysPerWeek
NumberperDay
39 EndDate
EngineTier
StartDate
FuelTypeDieselAverage1. 008.0033.00.73Dies
PhaseType
EquipmentTypeSawshoeshoes
PhaseNameDemolitionDemolition1/ 1/20263/12/20265.0050.0ÏSitePreparationSitePreparation3/ 13/20264/24/20265.0030.0ÏGradingGrading4/ 25/20268/8/20265.0075.0ÏBuildingConstructionBuildingConstruction8/ 9/20266/10/20295.00740ÏPavingPaving6/11/20298/27/20295.0055.0ÏArchitecturalCoatingArchitecturalCoating8/28/202911/13/20295.0055.0ÏPhaseNameDemolitionConcrete/ IndustrialDemolitionExcavatorsDieselAverage3.008.0 0014.00.745.1.ConstructionSchedule5.2.Off-RoadEquipment5.
VehicleMix
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
MilesperTrip
40 One-WayTripsperDay
TripTypeÏ
BuildingConstructionTractors/ Loaders/BackDieselAverage3. 007.0084.00.37BuildingConstructionWeldersDieselAverage1. 008.0046.00.45PavingPaversDieselAverage2. 008.0081.00.42PavingPavingEquipmentDieselAvera ge2.008.0089.00.36PavingRollersDieselAverage2.008.0036.0.38ArchitecturalCoatingAirCompressorsDieselAverage1.006.0037.0.48PhaseNameDemolitionDemolitionWorker15.018.5LDA,LD A,LDT1,LDT25.3.ConstructionVehicles5.
ParkingAreaCoated( sqft) AcresPaved(
Non-ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated( sqft) MaterialDemo
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
Non-ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated( sqft) AcresGraded
41 ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated( sqft) MaterialExpo
ÏÏÏÏ
ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated( sqft) MaterialImpor
BuildingConstructionVendor14. 310.2HHDT,MHDTBuildingConstructionHauling0. 0020.0HHDTBuildingConstructionOnsitetruckÏÏHHDTPavingÏÏÏÏPavingWorker15. 018.5LDA,LDT1,LDT2PavingVendorÏ10. 2HHDT,MHDTPavingHauli ng0.0 000.00ÏÏ5.4.Vehicles5.4.1.ConstructionVehicleControlStrategiesNon-applicable.Nocontrolstrategiesactivatedbyuser.5.5.ArchitecturalCoatings5.6.DustMitigation 5.6 VMT/Year
N2O
VMT/Sunday
AsphaltVMT/Saturday
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
CH4
VMT/Weekday
42 Trips/Year
CO2
AreaPaved(acres) Trips/Sunday
Trips/Saturday
kWhperYear
Trips/Weekday
SitePreparationÏÏ45. 00.00ÏGradingÏÏ2250.00ÏPaving0.000.000.000.002.68LandUseSingleFamilyHousing1. 480%ParkingLot1.21100%Year20260.005320.03<0.00520270.005320.03<0.005
5.6.2.ConstructionEarthmovingControlStrategies Non-applicable.Nocontrolstrategiesactivatedbyuser.5.7.ConstructionPaving5.8.ConstructionElectricityConsumptionandEmissionsFactorskWhperYearandEmissionF actor(lb/MWh)5.9.OperationalMobileSources5.9.1.Unmitigated5.1 ParkingAreaCoated( sqft)
Value
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
Non-ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated( sqft)
Unmitigated(number) Ï7114001370
43 Non-ResidentialInteriorAreaCoated( sqft)
Unit
ResidentialExteriorAreaCoated( sqft)
HearthTypeSingleFamilyHousingWoodFireplacesGasFireplacesPropaneFireplacesElectricFireplacesNoFireplacesConventionalWoodStoves0CatalyticWoodStovesNon- CatalyticWoodStoves7PelletWoodStovesResidentialInt eriorAreaCoated( sqft)529132.5176,3780.000 yr250 5.10.1.Hearths5.10.1.1.Unmitigated5.10.2.ArchitecturalCoatings5. 10.3.LandscapeEquipment5.11.OperationalEnergyConsumption 5.11.
TimesServiced
NaturalGas(kBTU/yr)
ServiceLeakRate
N2OOutdoorWater( gal/year) Cogeneration(kWh/year)
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024 OperationsLeakRate CH4Quantity(kg)
44 GWP
CO2IndoorWater( gal/year) Waste(ton/year)
RefrigerantR-410A
Electricity(kWh/yr)
EquipmentTypeOtherresidentialA/ Candheatpumpsrefrigeratorsand/ orfreezers SingleFamilyHousingHousehold Electricity( LandUseSingleFamilyHousing923, kWh/yr)9493460. andCO2andCH4andN2OandNaturalGas( kBTU/03300. yr)5.12. 00405,136,OperationalWaterandWastewaterConsumption 936ParkingLot46, 5.12. 0193460. 1. 03300.00400.00LandUseSingleFamilyHousing5, Unmitigated5.13. 028,43724, OperationalWasteGeneration 5. 861,959ParkingLot0. 13.1. 00ÏLandUseSingleFamilyHousing199ÏParkingLot0. Unmitigated5.14.00ÏLa OperationalRefriger ationandAirConditioningEquipment 5.14.ndUseTypeSingleFamilyHousingAverageroomA/C LoadFactorLoadFactor
AnnualHeatInput( MMBtu/yr)
FinalAcres
HorsepowerHorsepower
DailyHeatInput(MMBtu/day) FinalAcre
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
HoursPerDayHoursperYear
BoilerRating(MMBtu/hr)FuelTypeInitialAcres
45 NumberperDayHoursperDay
NumberInitialAcres
EngineTierNumberperDay
VegetationSoilType
FuelType
FuelTypeFuelType
EquipmentTypeEquipmentTypeEquipmentTypeEquipmentTypeVegetationLandUseTypeBiomassCoverTy
5.15.OperationalOff-RoadEquipment5.15.1.Unmitigated 5.16.StationarySources5.16.1.EmergencyGeneratorsandFirePumps5. 16.2.ProcessBoilers5.17.UserDefined5.18.Vegetation5.18.1.LandUseChange5. 18.1.1.Un mitigated5.18..BiomassCoverT 7miles(mi)by3.7mi. VulnerabilityScore
ouldbelighttomoderaterainfallif etal.,2017,CEC-500-2017-008),and rise, derRCP8. 0.5meter,5), 1.andconsiderhistoricaldata 0meter,1.41meters oncentrationPathway( RCP)8.5which Averageconditions( CanESM2),Ran ymaximum/minimumtemperaturesfrom ncrementsofsealevelrisecoupledwith ialwildfireprobabilitiesforthegridcell. T NaturalGasSaved( btu/year)
Unit
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
AdaptiveCapacityScor
ElectricitySaved( kWh/year)
46 SensitivityScore
ResultforProjectLocation
Number
Expo
TreeTypeClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeat9. 03annualdaysofextremeheatExtremePrecipitation3. 50annualdayswithprecipitationabove20mm A5.18.2.Sequestration5.18.2.1.Unmitigated 6.ClimateRiskDetailedReport6.1.ClimateRiskSummaryCal-Adaptmidcentury2040Î2059averageprojectionsforfourhazardsarereportedbelowforyourprojectlocation. Theseare underRepresentationCassumesGHGemissionswillcontinuetorisestronglythrough2050andthenplateauaround2100.TemperatureandExtremeHeatdataareforgridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.Theprojectionisbasedonthe9 8thhistoricalpercentileofdailobservedhistoricaldata(32climatemodelensemblefromCal-Adapt,2040Î2059averageunderRCP8.5). Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3ExtremePrecipitationdataareforthegridcellin whichyourprojectarelocated.Thethresholdof20mmisequivalenttoabout¾aninchofrain,whichwreceivedoverafulldayorheavyrainifreceivedoveraperiodof2to4hours.Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km)by6km,or3.7miles(mi)by3.7mi.SeaLevelRisedataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromRadkeetal.(2017),asreportedinCal-Adapt(RadkeconsiderinundationlocationanddepthfortheSanFranciscoBay, theSacrame nto-SanJoaquinRiverDeltaandCaliforniacoastresultingdifferentiextremestormevents.Usersmayselectfromfourscenariostoviewtherangeinpotentialinundationdepthforthegridcell.Thefourscenariosare:NoWildfiredataareforthegridcellinwhichyourprojectarelocated.TheprojectionsarefromUCDavis,asreportedinCal-Adapt(2040Î2059averageunofclimate,vegetation,populationdensity,andlarge(>400ha)firehistory.Usersmayselectfromfourmodelsimulationstoviewtherangeinpotentfoursimulationsmakedifferentassumptionsaboutexpectedrainfallandtemperatureare:Warmer/drier(HadGEM2-ES),Cooler/wetter(CNRM-MIROC5). CM5),differentrainfallandtemperaturepossibilities( Eachgridcellis6kilometers(km VulnerabilityScore
1to5,withascoreof5representingthe1to5, withascoreof5representingthe udeimplementationofclimateriskreduction plementationofclimateriskre tedonascaleof1to5, withascoreof5tedonascaleof1to5, withascore SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
AdaptiveCapacityScore
47 SensitivityScore
100N/A000N/AExposureScore1
WildfireFloodingN/AN/AN/AN/ADroughtN/AN/AN/AN/ASnowpackReductionN/ AN/AN/AN/AAirQualityDegradationClimateHazardTemperatureandExtremeHeatExtremePrecipitationN/ AN/AN/AN/ASeaLevelRise1112WildfireFlooding N/AN/AN/AN/ADroughtN/AN/AN/AN/ASnowpackReductionN/AN/AN/AN/ AAirQualityDegradation Thesensitivityscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonascaleofgreatestexposure. Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectreferstoitsabilitytomanage andreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards. Adaptivecapacityisrarepresentingthegreatestabilitytoadapt. Theoverallvulnerabilityscoresarecalculatedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityas sessmentsforeachhazard.Scoresdonotinclmeasures.6.3.AdjustedClimateRiskScores Thesensitivityscorereflectstheextenttowhichaprojectwouldbeadverselyaffectedbyexposuretoaclimatehazard.Exposureisratedonasc aleofgreatestexposure.Theadaptivecapacityofaprojectreferstoitsabilitytomanageandreducevulnerabilitiesfromprojectedclimatehazards.Adaptivecapacityisrarepresentingthegreatestabilitytoadapt.Theoverallvulnerabilityscoresarecalculatedbasedonthepotentialimpactsandadaptivecapacityassessmentsforeachhazard.Sco estate.
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
ResultforProjectCensusTractÏ57. 073.578.346.577.70.0087.544.2Ï94.80.000.0066.7Ï55.545.888.097.988.796.992.849.9 48 IndicatorExposureIndicatorsAQ- OzoneAQ-PMAQ-DPMDrinkingWaterLeadRiskHousingPesticidesToxicReleasesTrafficEffectIndicatorsCleanUpSitesGroundwaterHazWasteFacilities/ Generators86.4ImpairedWaterBodiesSoli dWasteSensitivePopulationAsthmaC vascularLowBirthWeightsSocioeconomicFactorIndicatorsÏEducationHousingLinguisticPovertyUnemployment7.1.CalEnviroScreen4.0Scores ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100. Ahighscore(i.e.,greatertha actsinthestate.
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
ResultforProjectCensusTractÏ5. 4151161349.839599645.838573078Ï10.6120877710045.81034262Ï2.66906197993.17336071Ï61.863210574.401385859Ï16.2710124535.8141922296.3557038494.2512511220.51841396Ï5.80007699 24. 516874118
52IndicatorEconomicAbovePovertyEmployedMedianHIEducationBachelor' sorhigherHighschoolenrollmentPreschoolenrol increnterseverehousingcostburden43.07712049.2.HealthyPlacesIndexScores ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.Ahighscore( i.e SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
1.680995765Ï1.86064416854.349.458.087.614.811.995.739.745.17.314.819.994.317.3Ï57.09.30.00.0 50 UncrowdedhousingHealthOutcomesInsuredadultsArthritisAsthmaERAdmissionsHighBloodPressureCancer( excludingskin)AsthmaCoronaryHeartDisease23. 5ChronicObstructivePulmonaryDisease17. 9DiagnosedDiabetesLifeEx pectancyatBirthCognitivelyDisabledPhysically DisabledHeartAttackERAdmissions78. 5MentalHealthNotGoodChronicKidneyDiseaseObesityPedestrianInjuriesPhysicalHealthNotGood7. 3StrokeHea tractsinthestate. thestate.
SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
0.569.31.393.321.655.323.0Ï96.6Ï31.1ResultforProjectCensusTract 51 ChildrenElderlyEnglishSpeakingForeign- bornOutdoorWorkersClimateChangeAdaptiveCapacityÏImperviousSurfaceCover11. 1TrafficDensityTrafficAccessOtherIndicesHardshipOtherDecisionSupport2016VotingMetricCalE nviroScreen4. 0ScoreforProjectLocation(a)90.0HealthyPlacesIndexScoreforProjectLocation(b)12.0ProjectLocatedinaDesig AssemblyBill617)No7.3.OverallHealth&EquityScoresa:ThemaximumCalEnviroScreenscoreis100.Ahighscore( i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectsahigherpollutionburdencomparedtoothercensustractsinb:ThemaximumHealthPlacesIndexscoreis100.A highscore(i.e.,greaterthan50)reflectshealthiercommunityconditionscomparedtoothercensus7.4.Health&EquityMeasuresNoHealth&EquityMeasuresselected.7 SingleFamilyResidenceDetailedReport, 11/13/2024
JustificationAsperAirbnbanalyticsdata
52 ScreenLandUse 7.6.Health&EquityCustomMeasuresNoHealth&EquityCustomMeasurescreated.8.UserChangestoDefaultData
MEMO
To File
From Stefanie OÓGorman
Subject ECONOMICS ANALYSIS OFSHORT-TERM RENTAL
REGULATION
Ramboll Americas Engineering Solutions, Inc. (Ramboll) evaluated possible DateNovember , 2024 consequences ofapotential banonshort-term rentals inSanta Ana, California.
This report was completed Stefanie OÓGorman, anenvironmental economist with 23years experience inherfield. Stefanie specializes intheintegration ofcosts andbenefits within decision making andhas worked across thespectrum from policy design anddevelopment toproject andinfrastructure delivery. Shehas acted asanexpert witness inanumber ofplanning related enquiries intheUK andIreland relating towater regulation, marine infrastructure planning and Ramboll transport related projects, focusing ontheeconomic andsocio-economic impacts 250Montgomery St., of Suite1200SanFrancisco, these developments.
CA94104 US
USA
EDUCATION/ QUALIFICATION
MSc Ecological Economics, University ofEdinburgh, 2001 T+15106557400 BA (Mod) Natural Science, Trinity College Dublin, 1999 F+15106559517 https://ramboll.com
Based onprofessional experience andjudgment, this analysis assumes a reasonably foreseeable potential that:
1.AbanonSTR will spur new hotel development and, asaresult ofincreased demand onlocal hotels, local hotel availability will godown androom rates will goup.
2.Result of (1), people will beforced totravel further tofindavailable or affordable hotel rooms.
Theses assumptions arefound tobesufficiently supported byevidence orthat insufficient evidence isavailable toreject them, asoutlined here.
Introduction
SantaAna, thelargestcityinOrangeCountyat27.2squaremilesand 1 hometonearly328,000residents, isarichcultural, culinary, and entertainmenthubwithdeephistoricalroots. Asthecountyseat, it 1 https://www.orangecounty. net/cities/SantaAna.html
1/5
blendsvibrantcitylifewithapreservedhistoriccore. Visitorscanexploreavarietyof attractions, fromtheart-filledstreetsoftheDowntownSantaAnaArtwalktotheBowers MuseumÓsglobal 2 collectionsandtheDiscoveryCube'sinteractivescienceexhibits The cityÓsdistinctiveneighborhoodsoffereverythingfromhistoricarchitecturetoinnovativefood markets, andthepopularFridaCinemaandYostTheatre.
TourismisacornerstoneofSantaAna'seconomy, drivingsubstantialrevenueandjob creationforthecommunity. In2023, visitorspendingalonecontributedanimpressive 3 414.7milliontothelocaleconomy, anincreaseofover9% comparedtotheprevious year. Thisspendingsupportslocalbusinessesandfuelssectorslikefoodservice, accommodations, retail, arts, andtransportation. Foodservicealonesaw $109millionfrom visitorspending, withaccommodations addinganother $107million, andarts, entertainment, andrecreationgenerating $81.5million. Thesevisitorexpendituresprovide essentialfundingforcityserviceslikepublicsafety, parks, andneighborhood improvements, whilealsoalleviatingthetaxburdenforresidentsÏwithout tourism-related taxrevenue, eachhouseholdwouldpayanadditional $195annuallyinlocaltaxes.
TourismÓsimpactonemploymentisequallysignificant, supportingnearly3,000jobsin SantaAnaandcontributingaround $137millioninwagestothelocalworkforce. With continuedgrowthinovernightvisitsandlocalattractions, tourismremainsavitalindustry thathelpssustainthecommunityÓs economicwell-beingandenhanceresidentsÓqualityof life.
1. HowabanonSTRcouldspurnewhoteldevelopmentandimpactdemand androomrates
OrangeCountyÓsSTRoccupancywas72% onayear-to-datebasisandRevPARwas $151 anditshotelsalsomaintainahigh77% occupancyrateandanADRof $196.59, which underscorestheregionÓsstrongdemand. HighoccupancyfiguresareseeninallmonthsÎ withonlyJanuaryfallingbelow70%. OrangeCountyÓshotelroomdemandshoweda5% year-over-yeargrowth, highlightingitspopularitywithinthestate.
BasedonAirDnadata, SantaAna'sappearstohaveorhaduptoapproximately2,180STR listings (approximately79% ofwhichareAirbnblistings), withacurrentoccupancyrateof 53%. Thisisapproximately
45 73% forAirbnbrentals, forwhichthereappeartobe
approximately1,100 activeSTRlistings. STRsgeneratesubstantialrevenueforhosts 6 estimatedat $43,000annuallyperhostforAirbnbrentals) withanAverageDailyRate ADR) of $ 7 237.3.
2 https://www.visitcalifornia. com/places-to-visit/santa-ana/ 3 https://www.travelsantaana. com/about-travel-santa-ana/economic-impact-oftourism/#:~:text=In%202023%2C%20traveler%20expenditures% 20from,in%20local%20and%20state%20tax es.
4 https://www.santa-ana.org/short-term-rentals-ban/
5 Wenote that even iftheexact amounts ofSTRs intheCity are slightly higher orlower than theapproximate values shown here, theconclusions ofthis report remain consistent regarding theimpact oftheSTR ban on spurring hotel demand andforcing individuals toforced totravel further tofind available oraffordable hotel rooms.
6 https://airbtics.com/annual-airbnb-revenue-in-santa-ana-california-usa/ 7 https://www.airdna.co/vacation-rental-data/app/us/california/santa-ana/overview 2/5
AccuratedataonthesizeofthewholelodgingsmarketinSantaAnaisnotreadilyavailable forreview, howeverthenumberoflistingsforhotelsandmotelsonwww.booking.com and Expediaisnotsignificant, atlessthan100. Themajorityofthesepropertiesare3staror less.
Ifweassumethattherateofhotel /motelstoSTRsinSantaAnaisrepresentativeofthatof OrangeCountrywherethehotelroomsupplyis61,937 (seetablebelow) andthenumberof STRs 8is10,841, thenSTRswouldrepresent15% ofthelodgingsupplyinSantaAna.
However, giventhe <100hotelsfoundonline, isitconsideredlikelythatSTRscontributiona significantlyhigherpercentageofthelodgingmarketlocally.
Forecast summary: Annual, Orange County
Hotel room Hotel supply demand Occupancy ADR RevPAR Room revenue daily) daily) Levels
2019 58,282 45,141 77.5% $ 161.94 $ 125.42 $ 2,668,166,801 2020 50,463 22,479 44.5% $ 136.03 $ 60.59 $ 1,116,070,720 2021 56,897 32,999 58.0% $ 167.45 $ 97.12 $ 2,016,885,289 2022 60,995 42,663 69.9% $ 177.02 $ 123.82 $ 2,756,556,935 2023 61,590 45,366 73.7% $ 185.82 $ 136.87 $ 3,076,862,904 2024 61,937 47,723 77.1% $ 196.59 $ 151.48 $ 3,424,409,154 Growth
2020 - 13.4% - 50.2% - 42.5% - 16.0% - 51.7% - 58.2%
2021 12.7% 46.8% 30.2% 23.1% 60.3% 80.7%
2022 7.2% 29.3% 20.6% 5.7% 27.5% 36.7%
2023 1.0% 6.3% 5.3% 5.0% 10.5% 11.6%
2024 0.6% 5.2% 4.6% 5.8% 10.7% 11.3%
Relative to2019
2020 87% 50% 58% 84% 48% 42%
2021 98% 73% 75% 103% 77% 76%
2022 105% 95% 90% 109% 99% 103%
2023 106% 100% 95% 115% 109% 115%
2024 106% 106% 99% 121% 121% 128%
Source: STR; Tourism Economics
Theminimumstaydurationsdataforshort-term rentalsinSantaAnavaries. AirDnadata suggeststhathalfofthestockhasaminimumstayofunder30days. Thisdataappearsto be2023dataandtorelatetotheirestimateof2,000+ STRlistinginthatdatasource.
Therefore, itisnotpossibleatthisstagetotellhowmanyoftheCityCouncilestimated 8 https://www.keydatadashboard. com/en-gb/markets/orange-county-california 3/5
1,100listingswouldbeimpactedbydesignatedforshorterstays, butitcouldbeashighas 100%.
STRListings byMinimum Stay inSantaAna
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%
30+ Nights7-29Nights4-6Nights3 Nights2 Nights1 Night
Source: https://www.airdna.co/vacation-rental-data/app/us/california/santa-ana/overview WithSTRsaccommodating asignificantportionofthelodgingmarket, theirremovalwould leaveaconsiderablegapinavailableaccommodations, whichtheexistinghotel infrastructureisunlikelytobeabletofullyabsorbgivenOrangeCounty'soccupancyrates werealreadyat77% inSeptember2024 (CaliforniaTravelForecastÎOctober2024).
EffectsofaBanonSTRonLocalHotelDemand, RoomRates, andAvailability EliminatingSTRsislikelytointensifydemandforhotelaccommodations, whichwould reduceavailabilityanddriveupaveragedailyrates (ADR). OrangeCounty'sADRisalready high, at $209.14 ( 9 seetablebelow) (192$ inSantaAna), andSantaAnaÓshotelmarketis partofthisbroaderregionwhereoccupancyandroomratesreflecthighdemand, particularlynearattractions. WithSTRscontributingsubstantialcapacity, thebanwould furtherstresslocalhotels, asnotedabovelikelyleadingtoincreasedADRduetoscarcity.
The7.1% year-on-yearincreaseinRevenuePerAvailableRoom (RevPAR) inOrangeCounty indicatesastrongmarketwithlimitedroomfornewcapacity; hence, shiftingdemandfrom STRstohotelswouldalmostcertainlyleadtohigherroomrates, potentiallypushingthem beyondthereachofbudget-conscioustravelers.
Short YeartoDate - September2024vsSeptember2023 Term Rentals Occ % ADR RevPAR
2024 2023 2024 2023 2024 2023
California 68.0 68.4 190.57 192.15 129.60 131.41
Orange County 72.1 72.0 209.14 210.91 150.74 151.91
9 https://rabbu.com/airbnb-data/santa-ana-ca
https://www.airdna.co/vacation-rental-data/app/us/california/santa-ana/overview 4/5
2. TravelDisplacementandNeedtoSeekAffordableLodgingElsewhere: Rising hotelratesandlimitedavailabilitycouldpushsomevisitorstolookformore affordableaccommodations innearbycities.
WiththeincreaseddemandandrisingpricesinSantaAnaÓshotelsector, neighboringareas likeAnaheimorIrvinemayabsorbsomeoftheoverflowbutwouldalsolikelyexperience upwardratepressure, creatingarippleeffectacrossOrangeCounty.
GiventhatOrangeCountyÓsoccupancywas72% onayear-to-datebasisandRevPARwas 151andshowshighoccupancyfiguresinallmonthsÎwithonlyJanuaryfallingbelow 70%, hotelsinadjacentareastoSantaAnaarelikelytobeatfullcapacityduringpeak 10 seasons, especiallyJuly ormajorevents. Asaresult, touristsmayfindthemselves travelingfartherforbudget-friendlylodging, potentiallydiscouragingsomevisitorsfrom choosingSantaAnaaltogether.
Inaddition, grouproomdemandinCaliforniawasuparobust7% relativetoSeptember 2023. OrangeCountysawthisincreaseby35% yearonyearforthemonthofSeptember 2024 11 Thisstronglocalgrowthindemandisreflectedbythefactthatapproximately650of 12 theAirBNBlistinginSantaAnaarefor2+bedrooms, sosuitableforgroups. Thelossofthis accommodation typemaynotbeeasilysubstitutedwithintheexistinglocalsupply, which could, asaresult, spurnadditionallocaldevelopment.
Theavailableevidenceandanalysisallowsareasonableconclusiontobedrawnthatinthe shorttermvisitorswillbepushedawayfrom SantaAnaduetooccupancyrestrictionsand increasedrates, andinthelongertermtheseconstraintscouldresultinnewhotelcapacity development.
10 https://rabbu.com/airbnb-data/santa-ana-ca
11 https://industry.visitcalifornia. com/research/report/monthly-travel-indicators-summary 12 Santa Ana, Airbnb Market Statistics & Data, United States 5/5
Ibarra, Evelyn
From: ThoaTran <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday,
To: eComment
Subject: PublicComment-CityCouncil- Nov19, AgendaItem #35 Attention: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachmentsorlinks.
DearCityCouncil Members ofSantaAna,
Wearewritingtoexpress ourstrongsupport fortheproposed ordinance tobanshort-termrentals (STRs) inourcityof SantaAna.
Theshort-termrentals havecaused manyproblems inourcity: excessive noise, parking problem, degradation ofthe neighborhood'sresidential character, trash, andmanymoreissues.
Manyfamilies haveaverydifficult timebuyingahomepartlyduetothehomesbeingsnatched athighprices byinvestors forshort-termrentalpurposes. Wehaveseenmanyhomesbeingboughtathighpricesbyinvestors todo short-termrentals thathavecaused somanyproblems forthefamilieswholiveintheneighborhood.
Please continue tosupport theordinance banning short-termrentalsandprotect thefamilies whoarelivinginSanta Ana.
CityCouncil Members ofSantaAna, mayyoubegreatly blessed forsupporting theordinance ofbanning short-term rentalsandprotecting theSantaAnafamilies
Sincerely,
ThoaTranandfamily
1 Ibarra, Evelyn
From: RickNguyen <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November
To: eComment
Subject: PublicComment--CityCouncil--Nov19th, AgendaItem #35 Attention: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachmentsorlinks.
DearCityCouncil Members ofSantaAna,
Wearewritingtorequest yoursupport fortheproposed ordinance tobanshort-termrentals (STRs) intheCityofSanta Ana
Short-termrentals havecausedmanyproblems forusandforthefamilies inthecityofSantaAna. Someofthe problems include butnotlimitedtoparking problems, excessive noise, trash, undermining theintegrity ofour neighborhood, andmanymoreissues
Thank youforsupporting theordinance banning short-termrentalsandprotecting thewell-beingofSantaAnafamilies overtheprofit-driveninterests ofSTRinvestors.
Sincerely,
RickNguyen andFamily
1 Ibarra, Evelyn
From: DianeTholin <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November
To: eComment
Subject: PublicComment—CityCouncil- Nov19th, Agendaitem #35 Attention: Thisemailoriginated fromoutside ofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopening attachments orlinks.
Re: ShorttermRentals
Iurgeyoutosupport theordinance tobanSTRssothatwecanprotect thelongtermwellbeingofSantaAnafamilies andneighborhoods overtheprofitdriveninterests ofSTRinvestors Thank you.
DianeTholin
1 Ibarra, Evelyn
From: ceo4dds <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, 31AM
To: eComment
Subject: Publiccomment- Nov19Agendaitem #35
Attention: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachmentsorlinks.
SantaAnaCityCouncil, Aspresident ofCasadeSantiago Istrongly recommend council supports theordinance banning shorttermrentals inSantaAna
Thank you,
JoannaPeterson
CDSPresident
Sentfrom myVerizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
1 Ibarra, Evelyn
From: ceo4dds <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, 32AM
To: eComment
Subject: Publiccomment- Nov19Agendaitem #35
Attention: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachmentsorlinks.
SantaAnaCityCouncil, Aspresident ofCasadeSantiago Istrongly recommend council keeps thebanonlimitedrentals.
Thank you,
JoannaPeterson
CDSPresident
Sentfrom myVerizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
1 Ibarra, Evelyn
From: KarenOCallaghan <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November
To: eComment
Subject: SACouncilMtg11/19/24 - PublicHearingAgendaItem #35re: STROrdinance Attention: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachmentsorlinks.
DearSantaAnaCityCouncil Members,
Asa35-yearresident ofWard3, IurgetheSACityCouncilto, onceagain, thoughtfully consider theissueofbanning ShortTermRentals (STRs) andconduct thorough research beforemaking afinaldecision.
Manylocalhostsstarted operating tosupplement theirincome, helping themremain intheirhomes. According to AirDNA, 81% ofSTRsinSantaAnaaresmallproperties withtwoorfewerbedrooms. It'simportant todifferentiate between small, owner-occupied hostsandabsentee owners whouseproperty management companies toruntheirSTR.
WhileIunderstand concerns aboutthehousing shortage, IdoubtthatSTRunitscansignificantly impactpermanent housing, asmostareone- ortwo-bedroom unitsinsideorattached toexisting homes.
SantaAnaismissing outonasignificant revenue opportunity. Byimplementing aTransient Occupancy Tax (TOT) and permitting onSTRs, asmanyothercitieshavedone, ourcitycouldgenerate muchneeded additional funds. This revenue, combined withtheeconomic boostfromSTRguests spending moneyatlocalrestaurants, shops, andservices, couldbeusedinotherareasofneedwithinourcity. Furthermore, thesefundswouldhelpprovide theresources to swiftlyenforce existing regulations andissuefinesfornoise, parking, andoccupancy limits, maintaining ourpeaceand safety.
Inclosing, IurgetheCounciltocarefully considerthesenuances instead ofapproving a 'blanket' banonSTRs. Let'sfinda balanced solution thathelpsresponsible hosts, generates cityrevenue, preserves ourneighborhoods, andfostersour localeconomy.
Thank you,
KarenO'Callaghan
1 Ibarra, Evelyn
From: TimNguyen <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, 35AM
To: eComment
Subject: PublicComment - CityCouncil - Nov19th, AgendaItem #35 Attention: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachmentsorlinks.
DearCityCouncil Members ofSantaAna,
Iamwritingtodaytostrongly support theproposed ordinance tobanshort-termrentals(STRs) inourcity.
Ihavebeenaresident for20+ yearsandhavefoundSTRstoonlytakefromourcommunity andnotaddtoit. WithSTRsI haveobserved that:
Guestsarenotconsiderate oftheirneighbors, beingloudandoftenthrowing parties Whenanissuearises, nooneseems totakeaccountability between theguests, investororevenAirBNBto address issues.
Theinvestors/ownersoftheseSTRproperties arenotfromourcityandareonlylooking atlininguptheir pockets withlittleconsideration fordevelopment ofourcommunity Wearereducing theamountofhomebuyers whowanttomakeSantaAnatheirpermanent placeofresidence andaddvaluetoourneighborhoods
Intheinterestofourcityandlocalcommunity, Istrongly urgethatwebanallSTRseffective immediately.
Thank you,
Tim
1 Ibarra, Evelyn
From: StephanieFeher <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November
To: eComment
Subject: Citycouncilmeetingagendaitem
Attention: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachmentsorlinks.
Iaminsupportofitem35, andIsupport banning short-termrentals inward3.
Thank you, Stephanie Feher, homeowner,
1 Ibarra, Evelyn
From: MauraO'Neill <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November19, 20241:01PM
To: eComment
Subject: PublicCommentLetteronAgendaItem #35
Attachments: BetterNeighborsLACommentLetter - AgendaItem35Support.pdf Attention: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachmentsorlinks.
Hello,
A?ached, please ndmycomment forthewri?enrecord onagenda item #35, Public Hearing – Conduct aFirst Reading andAdoptOrdinance Amendment (OA) No. 2024-04Repealing andReenac?nginitsEn?retyAr?cle XXItoChapter 8oftheSantaAnaMunicipal Code (SAMC) Prohibi?ngShort-TermRentals (STRs), andAdopt Enhanced FinesforViola?onsoftheShort-TermRentals Ordinance. Thisisinsupport oftheadop?onofthe ordinance toprohibit short-termrentals andadoptenhanced viola?onsfornes.
Thanks,
MauraO’Neill
she/her
PolicyAnalystandAdvocate
BetterNeighbors LA
213) 355-7475
maura@betterneighborsla. org
1 November19, 2024
CityCouncil
CityofSantaAna
20CivicCenterPlaza
SantaAna, CA92701
[email protected]
ViaElectronicMail
Re: BetterNeighborsLACommentLetter – November19, 2024HearingAgendaItem #35:
OrdinancetoRepealAndRe-EnactinitsEntiretyArticleXXItoChapter8oftheSanta AnaMunicipalCode (SAMC) ProhibitingShort-TermRentals (STRs) andtoAdopt EnhancedFinesforViolationsoftheShort-TermRentalOrdinance – SUPPORT DearCouncilmembers,
BetterNeighborsLAwritestoyouinsupportofadoptingtheOrdinanceAmendment OA) No. 2024-04thatwillrepealandre-enactinitsentiretyArticleXXItoChapter8ofthe SantaAnaMunicipalCode (SAMC) prohibitingShort-TermRentals (STRs) andadopting enhancedfinesforviolationsoftheShort-TermRentalOrdinance. AsresidentsacrossSouthern Californiacontinuetofaceahousingaffordabilityandhomelessness crisis, precautionsmustbe takentoprotecthousingstockforlong-termresidents. ItiscrucialtocodifySantaAna’s prohibitiononshort-termrentalswithintheCity, andintheprocess, furthersafeguardhousing forlong-term residents.
BetterNeighborsLAisacoalitionofhosts, tenants, housingactivists, hotelworkers, and communitymembersworkingtocurbillegalshort-termrentalactivitywiththeintenttoprotect 1 housingandneighborhoods impactedbytheshort-termrentalindustry. Weconductdata analysisandresearchontheshort-termrentalindustryanditsimpactonaffordablehousing.
AccordingtoouranalysisofAirDNAdata, thevastmajorityofshort-termrentalsintheCityof SantaAnaareunhosted, meaningtheyarewholehomerentalsthatarenotprimarilyusedfor 2 long-termhousing, unlikehostedrentals. Since2019, thenumberofunhostedshort-termrental listingshasincreasedby294% andgrowntoover509units. Hostedunits, ontheotherhand, haverisenby169listings, or134%. ThenumberofunhostedSTRsalignswiththestaffreport findingsonenforcementnoticesandcitations. Staffidentifiedthatthemajorityofpropertieswith 1https://www.betterneighborsla. org/
2AirDNAdata on file with Better Neighbors includes VRBO and Airbnb listings within the City ofSanta Ana through March 2023. https://www.airdna.co/
250East1stStreet, Suite1201; LosAngeles, California90012 213.336.5900 betterneighborsla.org
BetterNeighborsCommentLetter
AgendaItem35: RepealandRe-enactShortTermRentalRegulations Page2of4
confirmedactiveSTRenforcementcases involvedpropertiesownedbyanLLC, managedbya propertymanagement company, orownedbyabsenteeowners. Belowpleasefindthegrowthin short-termrentalsfrom2014to2023.
AVERAGEACTIVESHORT-TERM
RENTALLISTINGSINSANTAANA
Unhosted UnitsHosted Units
1200
1000
800 295
600 201 682
400 510
140 133 126 200 105 251 21 33 54 78 201 173 68 117 0 23 3038 2014201520162017201820192020202120222023
AsofMarch2023, themostrecentdatawehaveavailable, therewere991activeSTR 3 listingsinSantaAna, makingup1.27% ofSantaAna’shousingstock. Short-termrentalshave grownsignificantlyoverthelastfewyears, andintheprocesshavetakenhousingunitsoffthe long-termmarketthatmayhaveotherwisebeenavailabletolong-termtenantsorpotential homeowners. Accordingtothestaffreport, therearemorethan700STRscurrentlyoperatingin SantaAna. These700STRsaccountfor22% ofthe3,137permanenthousingunitsthattheCity hasidentifiedasrequiredbythe2021-2029Regional HousingNeedsAllocation (RHNA).
Ensuringthattheprohibitionofshort-termrentalsremainsinplaceintheCityofSantaAnawill safeguardthismilestoneinmeetingthe2021-2029RHNA goals.
SantaAnaisnotaloneintheirpushtobanshort-termrentals. WithinOrangeCounty, at leasttwelvecitieshave takenstepstoprohibitshort-termrentalsinsomeform. Thesecities includetheAlisoViejo, Brea, CostaMesa, FountainValley, GardenGrove, Irvine, LagunaHills, 4 LagunaNigel, VillaPark, Westminster, YorbaLinda, andLaHabra. InLosAngelesCounty, the 3Profile ofthe City ofSanta Ana, Southern California Association ofGovernments, https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/fileattachments/ santaana_ localprofile. pdf?1606012682. 4City ofAliso Viejo: https://www.codepublishing. com/CA/AlisoViejo/ html/AlisoViejo15/ AlisoViejo1514. html; City ofBrea:
https://codelibrary. amlegal.com/codes/brea/latest/brea_ca/0-0-0-70791; City ofCosta Mesa:
https://weblink.costamesaca. gov/WebLink/ DocView. aspx?id=233471& dbid=0&repo=CityofCostaMesa; City ofFountain Valley:
https://www.fountainvalley. gov/DocumentCenter/ View/16275/Ordinance- No-1591; City ofGarden Grove:
https://ecode360. com/42535001; City ofIrvine:
https://library.municode. com/ca/irvine/codes/zoning?nodeId=ZOOR_DIV3GEDESTLAUSRE_ CH3-25SHTERE_ S3-25- 5VIMIIN#:~:text=3%2D25%2D3.,of%20short%2Dterm%20rentals% 20prohibited.& text=section%20Compare% 20versionsA.,zoning%20district% 20within%20the%20City; City ofLaguna Hills:
250East1stStreet, Suite1201; LosAngeles, California90012 213.336.5900 betterneighborsla.org
BetterNeighborsCommentLetter
AgendaItem35: RepealandRe-enactShortTermRentalRegulations Page3of4
CityCouncilsofCalabasas, DiamondBar, Rosemead,CulverCity, WestHollywood, San Gabriel, LaMirada, Lakewood, RollingHills, Redondo, andLawndaleallhaveshort-term 5 rentalsbansinplace.AccordingtoastudypublishedintheRealEstateEconomics Journalin 2023, intheCityofIrvinerentalpricesdecreased3% onaveragefollowingtwoyearsafterthe 6 enforcementoftheirordinanceprohibitingshort-termrentalsinallresidentialzones. Thisstudy illustratesthepositiveimpactsaprohibitiononshort-termrentalscanhaveonaddressingthe affordabilityofhousingincitieswithinOrangeCounty. Giventhatamajorityofhousingunits withinSantaAnaarerenteroccupied, itislikelythatasimilarprohibitiononshort-termrentals will 7 protectfurtherprotecttenanthouseholds.
Abanonshort-termrentalsisonlyasvaluableastheenforcement thatbacksit. Tosee positiveeffectsonthehousingandrentalmarket, SantaAnashouldadopttheresolutionto enhanceadministrative finesforviolationoftheordinanceandimplement acentralized enforcement systemtoadministerthem. InLosAngeles, highadministrative burdenanda decentralized systemoftheHome-SharingOrdinanceenforcement hasledtorampantabuseof theshort-termrentalmarket. Forexample, inJulyof2024, LosAngeleshasover6,000listings 8 thatarenoncompliant withtheHome-SharingOrdinance. BetweenJanuaryandAugustof2024, 9 theCityonlyissued97citationsdespitethehighnumberofnoncompliant listing. Witha prohibitioninplaceandenhancedadministrative finesforviolatingtheordinance, SantaAnacan ensurethattheCityhasstrong, easilyenforceablerulesinordertoissuecitationsandmaintain theordinance’seffectiveness.
https://www.codepublishing. com/CA/LagunaHills/#!/ LagunaHills06/ LagunaHills0640. html, City ofLaguna Nigel:
https://library.municode. com/ca/laguna_niguel/codes/code_of_ordinances? nodeId=TIT9PLZO_ DIV1PL_ART2COZOCO_ SUB ARTICLE_ 3REDI_S9-1-38GRHO; City ofVilla Park:
https://library.municode. com/ca/villa_park/codes/code_of_ordinances? nodeId=CHXXIIIZO_ ART23-3EFZORE_ S23-
3.5SHRMRE; City ofWestminster: https://library.qcode.us/lib/westminster_ ca/pub/municipal_ code/item/title_9-chapter_9_74- 9_74_020; City ofYorba Linda: https://library.qcode.us/lib/yorba_linda_ca/pub/municipal_ code/item/title_5-chapter_5_50- 5_50_030. City ofLa Habra: https://www.lhhcity.org/325/Short-Term- Rentals 5Calabasas:
https://library.municode. com/ca/city_of_calabasas/ codes/code_of_ordinances? nodeId=TIT17LAUSDE_ ARTIIZODIALLAUS_ C H17.12STSPLAUS_ 17.12.175SHRMREOCPRPREXLAAPHOMOBEBRIN; Diamond Bar:
https://www.diamondbarca. gov/Faq.aspx?QID=314; Rosemead:
https://library.municode. com/ca/rosemead/ ordinances/ code_of_ordinances? nodeId=900458; Culver City:
https://www.culvercity. org/Have-Your-Say/Short-Term- Rentals; West Hollywood:
https://ecode360. com/43916115? highlight= rental,rentals& searchId= 1904165411732459# 43916115; San Gabriel:
https://www.sangabrielcity. com/1341/Frequently- Asked-Questions#:~: text=Shortterm%20rentals% 20(anything% 20less,term%20rental% 20or%; LaMirada:
https://www.airbnb.com/help/article/2692#:~:text=Short%2Dterm%20rentals% 20in%20residential, not%20permitted% 20in%20L a%20Mirada; Lakewood: https://www.lakewoodcity. org/Business/ Short-term-rentals Rolling Hills:
https://library.municode. com/ca/rolling_hills_estates/codes/code_of_ordinances? nodeId=TIT17ZO_ CH17.47SHRMRERE_ 17.47 020PU; Redondo Beach: https://www.redondobeachtourism. com/news/airbnb; Lawndale: https://ecode360. com/LA4957 6https://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1540-6229.12440 7According tothe City ofSanta Ana General Plan Housing Element, in2018 53.8% ofhouseholds were renter occupied, while
46.1% were owner occupied,
https://docs.google.com/viewerng/ viewer?url=https://storage.googleapis. com/proudcity/ santaanaca/ uploads/ 2022/09/Housing_El ement_-Complete- 9.16.22_Compressed. pdf
8Data onfile with BNLA from Los Angeles City Granicus data. https://granicus. com/ 9Data onfile with BNLA from Los Angeles City Planning Department. 250East1stStreet, Suite1201; LosAngeles, California90012 213.336.5900 betterneighborsla.org
BetterNeighborsCommentLetter
AgendaItem35: RepealandRe-enactShortTermRentalRegulations Page4of4
Theproposedordinancewill furthercodifytheprohibitionand continueprotectinglongtermresidents. AccordingtotheCityofSantaAnaGeneralPlanHousingElement, almosthalf 48%) ofallhouseholds spendmorethan30% oftheirincomeonhousingscostsandthusare consideredcostburdened. Inaddition, theNationalLowIncomeHousingCoalition, thefair marketrentforatwo-bedroomhomeis $2,100, meaningahouseholdwouldhavetoearnmore 10 than $40/hourtoaffordtohousetheirfamily. AsresidentsintheCityofSantaAnacontinueto beartheimpactsofhighhousingcosts, itisimperativetheCityprotectandpreservehousingfor long-termresidents.
Forthesereasons, BetterNeighborsrequeststheCityCounciluphold theshort-termrental ordinancepassedinAprilofthisyearbyrepealingandre-enactingtheShort-TermRental Ordinanceandadoptingenhancedfinesforviolations. Shouldyouhaveanyquestions, please contactMauraO’[email protected].
Sincerely,
BetterNeighborsLA & UniteHERELocal11
10Data for zip code 92701, https://nlihc.org/oor/zip?code=92701. 250East1stStreet, Suite1201; LosAngeles, California90012 213.336.5900 betterneighborsla.org