Cities Index.
Exhibit 2

Santa Ana City Council
February 4, 2025

Document
Exhibit 2
Meeting
February 4, 2025
Body
Santa Ana City Council
Pages
11
Original file
6.6 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on santa-ana.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

LS 11. 19. 19
RESOLUTIONNO. 2019-107

ARESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOF
SANTAANA (1) ADOPTINGENVIRONMENTALFINDINGSOF FACT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTALQUALITYACT, (2) CERTIFYINGTHEFINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ( SCH 2018021031), ( 3) ADOPTING A STATEMENTOF
OVERRIDINGCONSIDERATIONSFORTHEPROPOSEDPROJECT, ( 4) ADOPTING THE MITIGATION MONITORINGAND REPORTINGPROGRAM, AND ( 5)

APPROVINGTHE PROPOSEDADDINGTONMULTI-

FAMILYRESIDENTIALPROJECTLOCATEDWITHINTHE
CITYOFSANTAANAAT2525NORTHMAINSTREET
BEITRESOLVEDBYTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFSANTAANAASFOLLOWS:

Section 1.

TheCityCounciloftheCityofSantaAnaherebyfinds, determinesand declares as follows:

WHEREAS, AC2525Main, LLC ("Applicant") seekstodeveloptheAddingtonMulti -FamilyResidentialProject ("proposedProject"), originally proposed as a 496- unit multi -familyresidentialprojectona5.93-acresiteat2525NorthMainStreetinSantaAna, California ("ProjectSite'); and WHEREAS, duringtheentitlementandenvironmentalreviewprocess, andinresponsetocommentsandconcernsraisedbythepublicandtheCity's electedofficials, theApplicanthasproposedmodificationstotheoriginalproposal; and WHEREAS, theProjectascurrentlyproposednowentails, amongotherthings, 1) demolitionoftheexisting81,172squarefootvacanttwo-storyofficebuildingand442-spacesurfaceparkinglotontheProjectSite; (2) redevelopmentofthe5.93-acresitewith444,534squarefeetoftotaldevelopment, including277,281squarefeetofresidentialbuildingsthatwouldprovide256for -rentmulti -familyresidentialunitsanda 167,253squarefootcentralparkingstructureanda284spacesurfacelevelparkinglotforresidentialandcommercialparking; (3) approvalofDevelopmentAgreementNo. 2018-01betweentheCityofSantaAna ("City") andApplicant; (4) approvalofGeneralPlanAmendmentNo. 2018-06, whichwouldchangetheProjectSite'sexistinglandusedesignation of Professional & AdministrationOffice (PAO) toDistrictCenter (DC); and 5) approvalofAmendmentApplicationNo. 2018-10, whichwouldchangethezoningoftheProjectSitefromProfessional (P) toSpecificDevelopmentNo. 93 (SD-93) designation; and Resolution No. 2019- 107

Page 1 of 11 ends

WHEREAS, theproposedProjecthasbeensubmittedandrequiresreviewandcertificationof an EnvironmentalImpactReport (the "EIR") ( SCH# 2018021031) EnvironmentalImpactReportNo. 2018-01), andapprovalofDevelopmentAgreementNo. 2018-01, GeneralPlanAmendmentNo. 2018-06, andAmendmentApplicationNo. 2018- 10; and WHEREAS, theProjectSiteislocatedatthenortheastcornerofNorthMainStreetandEdgewoodRoadandthepropertiesimmediatelyadjacenttothesiteincludeSantiagoParktothenorth, single-familyresidentialhomestothesouthandeastandtheDiscoveryScienceCenterofOrangeCountyacrossMainStreettothewest. TheProjectSiteislocatedonNorthMainStreet, anurbancorridorwithintheCity. TheProjectSiteisalsolocatedatamainentrypointtotheParkSantiagoNeighborhood, aresidentialneighborhoodpredominantlycomprisedofdetachedsingle-familydwellings; and WHEREAS, pursuanttosection21067ofthePublicResourcesCode, andsection15367oftheStateCEQAGuidelines (CaliforniaCodeofRegulations, Title14, § 15000etseq.), theCityofSantaAnaistheleadagencyfortheproposedProject; and WHEREAS, inaccordancewithStateCEQAGuidelinessection15063, theCityconductedanInitialStudytodetermineiftheProjectmayhaveasignificanteffectontheenvironmentandtoevaluatewhetheranEnvironmentalImpactReport ("EIR") wasrequired; and WHEREAS, afterconductingtheInitialStudy, theCitydeterminedthatanEIRshouldbepreparedtoevaluatetheproposedProject'spotentialtohaveasignificanteffectontheenvironmentinthefollowingareas: Aesthetics, AirQuality, BiologicalResources, CulturalResources, GreenhouseGasEmissions, HazardsandHazardousMaterials, LandUseandPlanning, Noise, PopulationandHousing, PublicServices, Recreation, Transportation/Traffic, andUtilities; and WHEREAS, basedontheInitialStudy, theCityfurtherdeterminedthatimpactstoAestheticsregardingscenicresourcesincluding, butnotlimitedto, trees, rockoutcroppings, andhistoricbuildingswithinastatescenichighway; toAgricultureandForestryResourcesregardingfarmland; agriculturalland, forestlandtimberlandorconversionof; toBiologicalResourcesregardingwetlands, conflictswithatreepreservationpolicyorordinance, conflictswithaHabitatConservationPlanorNaturalCommunityConservationPlan; toGeologyandSoilsregardingaknownearthquakefault, landslides, orsoilsincapableofadequatelysupportingseptictanksorwastewaterdisposal; toHazardsregardingsiteslistedonahazardousmaterialssite, anairportlanduseplan, privateairstriporwildlandfires; toHydrologyandWaterQualityregardinghousingwithina100-yearfloodhazardarea; toLandUseandPlanningregardingconflictswithaHabitatConservationPlanorNaturalCommunityConservationPlan; toMineralResourcesregardinglossofamineralresourcetotheregionorlocally; toNoiseregardingconflictswithanairportlanduseplanorprivateairstrip; PopulationandHousingregardingdisplacingexistinghousingnecessitatingreplacementhousingor Resolution No. 2019-107

Page 2 of 11 ends

LS 11.19.19
displacingsubstantialnumberofpersonsnecessitatingconstructionofreplacementhousing; toTransportation/Trafficregardingachangeinairtrafficpatterns; toUtilitiesandServiceSystemsregardingfederal, stateandlocalsolidwasteregulationswouldhavenoimpactorbelessthansignificantandthusneednotbeanalyzedfurtherintheEIR; and WHEREAS, inaccordancewithStateCEQAGuidelinessection15082, onFebruary12, 2018, theCitysenttotheOfficeofPlanningandResearchandeachresponsibleandtrusteeagencya Noticeof Preparation ("NOP") - which was also publishedintheOrangeCountyRegister, anewspaperofgeneralcirculation - statingthatanEnvironmentalImpactReport (StateClearinghouseNumber #2018021031) would be prepared; and WHEREAS, duringthepubliccommentperiod, copiesoftheInitialStudywereavailableforreviewandinspectionatCityHall (20CivicCenterPlaza), ontheCity'swebsite, andattheSantaAnaPublicLibrary (26CivicCenterPlaza); and WHEREAS, pursuanttoPublicResourcesCodesection21083.9 andState CEQAGuidelinessections15082(c) and15083, theCityheldadulynoticedScopingMeetingonMarch1, 2018, tosolicitcommentsonthescopeoftheenvironmentalreview of the proposed Project; and WHEREAS, onehundredandsixty-three (163) commentletterswerereceivedinresponse to the NOP; and WHEREAS, aDraftEnvironmentalImpactReport ("DraftEIR") waspreparedfortheproposedProject, addressingcommentsreceivedinresponsetotheNOPandevaluatingtheproposedProject'spotentiallysignificantenvironmentalimpacts; and WHEREAS, theDraftEIRconcludedthattheproposedProjectwouldhaveasignificantandunavoidableimpacttoAestheticswiththeimplementationofmitigationmeasuresregardingthe existingvisualcharacterof the ProjectSiteandits surroundings, asimplementationoftheproposedProjectwouldresultinasignificantandunavoidablechangeinvisualscale, height, andsetbacksfromSantiagoPark, EdgewoodRoad, andNorthBushStreet; and WHEREAS, theDraftEIRfurtherdeterminedthatmitigationmeasureswererequiredtomitigateimpactstoalessthansignificantlevelforthefollowingresourceareas: AirQuality, BiologicalResources, HazardsandHazardousMaterials, Noise, andTribal Cultural Resources; and WHEREAS, inaccordancewithStateCEQAGuidelinessection15085, aNoticeofCompletionwaspreparedandfiledwiththeOfficeofPlanningandResearchonAugust 7, 2018; and Resolution No. 2019- 107

Page 3 of 11 ends

WHEREAS, asrequiredbyStateCEQAGuidelinessection15087(a), theCity providedaNoticeofAvailabilityoftheDraftEIRtothepublic - andpublishedtheNoticeofAvailabilityintheOrangeCountyRegister - atthesametimethattheCitysentaNoticeofCompletiontotheOfficeofPlanningandResearchonAugust7, 2018; and WHEREAS, duringthepubliccommentperiod, copiesoftheDraftEIRandtechnicalappendiceswereavailableforreviewandinspectionatCityHall (20CivicCenterPlaza), ontheCity'swebsite, andattheSantaAnaPublicLibrary (26CivicCenter Plaza); and WHEREAS, duringthepubliccommentperiod, onAugust27, 2018, thePlanningCommissionheldadulynoticedpublichearingtoreceivecommentsontheDraftEnvironmentalImpactReportpursuanttoStateCEQAGuidelinessection15087(i); and WHEREAS, inresponsetoa requestfromChatten-Brown & Cartens LLP, on behalfoftheNorthSantaAnaPreservationAlliance, theCityextendedtheDraftEnvironmentalImpactReportpublicreviewandcommentperiodtoOctober4, 2018toallowadditionaltimeforpublicreviewandinput; and WHEREAS, consistentwithStateCEQAGuidelinessection15087(e), theDraftEIRwascirculatedfora59-dayreviewperiod, fromAugust7, 2018toOctober4, 2018; and WHEREAS, duringthe59-daypubliccommentperiod, theCityconsultedwithandrequestedcommentsfromallresponsibleandtrusteeagencies, otherregulatoryagencies, andotherspursuanttoStateCEQAGuidelinessection15086; and WHEREAS, theCityreceivedforty-four (44) writtencommentlettersandsix (6) verbalcommentsontheDraftEIRattheAugust27, 2018publichearing, includingawrittenacknowledgementfromtheStateClearinghousethattheCityhascompliedwithCEQAenvironmentalreviewrequirements; and WHEREAS, pursuanttoPublicResourcesCodesection21092.5, onNovember15, 2018, theCityprovidedcopiesofitsresponsestocommentingpublicagenciesandinterestedorganizationsandpartiesmorethanten (10) dayspriortotheCity'sconsiderationoftheFinalEIR; and WHEREAS, onNovember15, 2018, theCityreleasedtheFinalEIR ("FinalEIR"), whichconsistsoftheDraftEIR, alltechnicalappendicespreparedinsupportoftheDraftEIR, allwrittencommentlettersreceivedontheDraftEIR, writtenresponsestoallwrittencommentlettersreceivedandverbalcommentsreceivedontheDraftEIR, revisionstotheDraftEIRandtechnicalappendices, andtheMitigationMonitoringandReportingProgram; and WHEREAS, onNovember26, 2018, thePlanningCommissioncontinuedaduly noticedpublichearingfortheprojecttoJanuary14, 2019andheldasecondstudy ResolutionNo. 2019-107

Page 4 of 11 ends

LS 11. 19.19
sessiontooverviewtheProjectandfifty-eight (58) verbalcommentswerereceivedtwenty-five (25) insupport; thirty (31) inoppositionandtwo (2) neutral) andeleven (11) writtencommentswerereceived (two (2) insupportandnine (9) inopposition); and WHEREAS, onJanuary14, 2019, thePlanningCommissionconductedadulynoticedpublichearingtoconsidertheEIR, DevelopmentAgreementNo. 2018-01, GeneralPlanAmendmentNo. 2018-06, andAmendmentApplicationNo. 2018-10andsolicitedcommentsontheEIR. Atthemeeting, seventy-nine (79) membersofthe publicspokeontheitem, thirty (30) speakerssupportedtheproject, forty-eight (48) opposeditandonespeakerwasneutral. Afterhearingallrelevanttestimonyfromstaff, thepublicandtheCity's consultantteam, thePlanningCommissionvotedtorecommendthattheCityCouncilnotcertifytheEIRoradoptthefindings, thestatement ofoverridingconsiderationsandthemitigationmonitoringandreportingprogramanddeny the Project; and WHEREAS, onFebruary5, 2019, theCityCouncilconductedadulynoticedpublichearingtoconsidertheEIR, DevelopmentAgreementNo. 2018-01, GeneralPlanAmendmentNo. 2018-06, andAmendmentApplicationNo. 2018-10andsolicitedcommentsontheEIR. Atthemeeting, sixty-one (61) membersofthepublicspokeontheitem, thirty-eight (38) speakerssupportedtheproject, twenty (20) speakersopposeditandthree (3) speakerswereneutralandthepublichearingwascontinuedtothenextregularadjournedCityCouncilmeetingonFebruary19, 2019; and WHEREAS, onFebruary19, 2019, theCityCouncilcontinuedtoconductthedulynoticedpublichearingtoconsidertheEIR, DevelopmentAgreementNo. 2018-01, GeneralPlanAmendmentNo. 2018-06, andAmendmentApplicationNo. 2018-10andsolicited comments on the EIR. At themeeting, onehundredandthirty-one (131) membersofthepublicspokeontheitem, twenty-six (26) speakerssupportedtheprojectandonehundredandfive (105) speakersopposedit. Furthermore, onehundredandsixty-six (166) writtencommentswerereceivedwithnine (9) insupportandonehundredandfifty-seven (157) inopposition. Afterhearingallrelevanttestimonyfromstaff, thepublicandtheCity's consultantteam, theCityCouncilvotedthattheapplicationsgobacktothePlanningCommissionforreconsiderationafterfurtherconsultationwiththe community; and WHEREAS, inJune2019, theapplicantsubmittedarevisedplanconsistingofdevelopment347multi -familyunits (59dwellingunitsperacre), with642parkingspaces1.85parkingspacesperunit) andparkingcapacityat2.0spacesperunit, withina4- storyresidentialbuildingwrappedaroundafive -levelparkingstructurewithanamenitydeckonthesixth -level, privateopenspace, andredesignedtheintersectionofMainStreetandWalkieWay/SantiagoParkDrivetoprovideaccesstotheprojectona5.93- acre site (the "June Revised Plan"); and WHEREAS, onAugust12, 2019, thePlanningCommissionconductedadulynoticedpublichearingtoconsidertheJuneRevisedPlan. Atthemeeting, seventy- seven (77) membersoftheexpressedopposition; nine (9) supportedtheproject, and Resolution No. 2019- 107

Page 5 of 11 ends

onespeakerwasneutral. Inaddition, one -hundred (100) writtencommentswerereceivedwithsix (6) insupportandninety-four (94) inopposition. Afterhearingallrelevanttestimonyfromstaff, thepublicandtheCity'sconsultantteam, thePlanningCommissionvoteresultedinanimpasse; and WHEREAS, inOctober2019, inresponsetocommentsreceivedtheapplicantsubmittedafurtherrevisedplanincludingredevelopmentofthe5.93-acresitewith444,534squarefeetoftotaldevelopment, including277,281squarefeetofresidentialbuildingsthatwouldprovide256for -rentmulti -familyresidentialunitsanda167,253squarefootcentralparkingstructureanda284spacesurfacelevelparkinglotwhichalsoreducedtheProject'sheight, increasedtheProject'ssetbacks, andmodifiedtheProjectentrance ("OctoberModifiedProject"); and WHEREAS, theCityhasprepared "ClarificationstotheFinalEIR" todetermineiftheOctoberModifiedProjectwouldresultin neworsubstantiallyincreasedenvironmentaleffectsthanthoseanalyzedintheEIRsuchthattheEIRwouldrequirerecirculationpriortoitscertification; and WHEREAS, theClarificationstotheFinalEIRincludedetailedanalysis, baseduponsubstantialevidence, thatdemonstratethattheModifiedProjectwouldnotresultinanyneworsubstantiallygreaterimpactsthanaredisclosedintheEIR, nonewmitigationmeasuresbeyondthoseidentifiedintheEIRarerequired, andnoadditionalfeasiblealternativesor mitigationmeasuresconsiderablydifferentfromothers previouslyanalyzedwouldclearlylessenthesignificantenvironmentalimpactsoftheproject; and WHEREAS, onOctober28, 2019, thePlanningCommissionconductedaduly noticedpublichearingtoconsidertheEIR, DevelopmentAgreementNo. 2018-01, GeneralPlanAmendmentNo. 2018-06, andAmendmentApplicationNo. 2018-10andsolicitedcommentsontheEIR. Atthemeeting, sixty-two (62) expressedoppositionandtwo (2) inexpressedsupporttheproject. Inaddition, ninety-eight (98) individualssubmittedcommentswithninety-four (94) inoppositionandfour (4) insupport; and WHEREAS, afterhearingallrelevanttestimonyfromstaff, thepublicandthe City'sconsultantteam, thePlanningCommissionbyavoteof3:2, votedtorecommenddenialoftheproject. SincetheentitlementsrequirefinalactionbytheCityCouncil, theactionswereforwardedtotheCityCouncil; and WHEREAS, onNovember8, 2019, theCitygavepublicnoticeofaCityCouncil publichearingforconsiderationofEnvironmentalImpactReportNo. 2018-01 (StateClearinghouseNumber #2018021031) byadvertisingintheOrangeCountyRegister, anewspaperofgeneralcirculation, andbymailingtoownersofpropertyandresidentswithin500feetoftheProject; and WHEREAS, onNovember19, 2019, theCityCouncilconductedadulynoticed publichearingtoconsidertheEIR, DevelopmentAgreementNo. 2018-01, GeneralPlan Resolution No. 2019- 107

Page 6 of 11 ends

LS 11. 19. 19
AmendmentNo. 2018-06, andAmendmentApplicationNo. 2018-10andatwhichhearingmembersofthepublicwereaffordedanopportunitytocommentuponEnvironmentalImpactReportNo. 2018-01. Afterhearingallrelevanttestimonyfrom staff, thepublicandtheCity'sconsultantteam, theCityCouncilvotedtocertifytheEIR, adoptthefindings, thestatementofoverridingconsiderationsandthemitigationmonitoringandreportingprogramandapprovetheOctoberModifiedProject; and WHEREAS, the "EIR" consistsoftheFinalEIR, ClarificationstotheFinalEIR, andallattachmentsandappendicestoboththeFinalEIRandtheClarificationstothe FinalEIR, aswellastheDraftEIRanditsattachmentsandappendices (asmodifiedbythe Final EIR); and WHEREAS, allpotentiallysignificantadverseenvironmentalimpactsweresufficiently analyzed in the EIR; and WHEREAS, ascontainedherein, theCityCouncilhasendeavoredingoodfaithtosetforththebasisforitsdecisionandrecommendationsontheProject; and WHEREAS, alloftherequirementsofthePublicResourcesCodeandtheStateCEQAGuidelineshavebeensatisfiedbytheCityinconnectionwiththepreparationoftheEIR, whichissufficientlydetailedsothatallofthepotentiallysignificantenvironmentaleffectsoftheProjecthavebeenadequatelyevaluated; and WHEREAS, allofthefindingsandconclusionsmadebytheCityCouncilPursuanttothisResolutionarebasedupontheoralandwrittenevidencepresentedtoitasawholeandtheentiretyoftheadministrativerecordfortheProject, whichareincorporatedhereinbythisreference, andnotbasedsolelyontheinformationprovidedin this Resolution; and WHEREAS, theCityCouncilfindsthattheProject'ssignificantenvironmentalimpactsthatcannotbemitigatedtoa lessthansignificantlevelevenwiththeincorporationofallfeasiblemitigationmeasures, asidentifiedintheEIR, aredescribedinSection7oftheCEQAFindingsofFact, attachedheretoasExhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, theCityCouncilfindsthattheProject'senvironmentalimpactsthatarelessthansignificantwiththeincorporationofmitigationmeasures, asidentifiedintheEIR, aredescribedinSection8oftheFindingsofFact, attachedheretoasExhibitA"; and WHEREAS, theCityCouncilfindsthatenvironmentalimpactsthatareidentifiedintheEIRaslessthansignificantanddonotrequiremitigationaredescribedinSection9oftheFindingsofFact, attachedheretoasExhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, thecumulativeimpactsoftheProjectidentifiedintheEIRaredescribedinSection9.17oftheFindingsofFact, attachedheretoasExhibit "A'; and ResolutionNo. 2019-107

Page 7 of 11 ends

WHEREAS, thepotentialsignificantandirreversibleenvironmentalchangesthatwouldresultfromtheproposedProjectidentifiedintheEIRandsetforthherein, aredescribedinSection10oftheFindingsofFact, attachedheretoas "ExhibitA"; and WHEREAS, theexistenceofanygrowth -inducingimpactsresultingfromthe proposedProjectidentifiedintheEIRandsetforthherein, aredescribedinSection11oftheFindingsofFact, attachedheretoasExhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, alternativestotheproposedProjectthatmightfurtherreducethe proposedProject'senvironmentalimpactsaredescribedinSection12oftheFindingsofFact, attachedheretoasExhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, priortotakingaction, theCityCouncilhasheard, beenpresentedwith, reviewedandconsideredalloftheinformationanddataintheadministrativerecord, includingbutnotlimitedtotheEIR, andalloralandwrittenevidencepresentedtoitduringallmeetingsandhearings; and WHEREAS, theEIRreflectstheindependentjudgmentoftheCityCouncilandisdeemedadequateforpurposesofmakingdecisionsonthemeritsoftheProject; and WHEREAS, nocommentsmadeinthepublichearingconductedbytheCityCouncilandnoadditionalinformationsubmittedtotheCityhaveproducedsubstantialnewinformationrequiringrecirculationoftheEIRoradditionalenvironmentalreviewoftheProjectunderPublicResourcesCodesection21092.1andStateCEQAGuidelinessection 15088.5; and WHEREAS, allotherlegalprerequisitestotheadoptionofthisResolutionhaveoccurred; and NOWTHEREFORE, THECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFSANTAANADOESRESOLVE, DETERMINE, FIND, ANDORDERASFOLLOWS:

1. TheCityCouncilherebyfindsthatithasbeenpresentedwiththeEIR, whichithasreviewedandconsidered, andfurtherfindsthattheEIRisanaccurateandobjectivestatementthathasbeencompletedinfullcompliancewithCEQAandtheStateCEQAGuidelines, andthattheEIRreflectstheindependentjudgmentandanalysis of the City.

2. TheCityCouncildeclaresthatnoevidenceofnewsignificantimpactsor anynewinformationof "substantialimportance", as definedbyStateCEQAGuidelinessection15088.5, hasbeenreceivedbytheCityaftercirculationoftheDraftEIRthatwouldrequirerecirculationofthe EIR.

NOWTHEREFORE, THECITYCOUNCILHEREBY:

Resolution No. 2019-107

Page 8 of 11 ends

LS 11.19.19

1. AdoptstheFindingsofFact, attachedheretoandincorporatedherein as Exhibit " A."

2. CertifiestheEIRbasedontheentiretyoftherecordofproceedings.

3. AdoptstheStatementof OverridingConsiderations, attachedheretoandincorporatedhereinasExhibit "B", afterbalancingthesignificantandunavoidableaestheticimpactsoftheProjectagainstthe benefits of the Project.

4. AdoptstheMitigationMonitoringandReportingProgramattachedheretoand incorporatedhereinas Exhibit "C", consistent with PublicResourcesCodesection21081.6; makeimplementationoftheMitigationMeasurescontainedintheMitigationMonitoringandReportingProgramaconditionofapprovaloftheProject; andfindthatintheeventof anyinconsistenciesbetweentheMitigation MeasuressetforthhereinandtheMitigationMonitoringand
ReportingProgram, the MitigationMonitoringandReportingProgram shall control.

5. DirectsCitystafftocauseaNoticeofDeterminationtobefiledand postedwiththeCountyofOrangeRegistrar-Recorder/CountyClerkandtheStateClearinghousewithinfive (5) workingdaysoftheCityCouncil's final Project approval.

Section 2. INDEMNIFICATION. The Applicanthas agreedto and shall indemnify, protect, defendandholdtheCityand/oranyofitsofficials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorizedvolunteers, andinstrumentalitiesthereof, harmlessfromanyandallclaims, demands, lawsuits, writsofmandamus, andotherproceedings (whetherlegal, equitable, declaratory, administrativeoradjudicatoryinnature), andalternativedisputeresolutionprocedures (including, butnotlimitedtoarbitrations, mediations, andsuchotherprocedures), judgments, orders, anddecisionscollectively " Actions"), broughtagainstthe City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalitiesthereof, that challenge, attack, orseektomodify, setaside, void, orannul, anyactionof, orany permitorapprovalissuedbytheCityand/oranyofitsofficials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, andinstrumentalitiesthereof (includingactions approvedbythevotersoftheCity) fororconcerningtheProject, whethersuchActionsarebroughtundertheRalphM. BrownAct, CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct, thePlanningandZoningLaw, theSubdivisionMapAct, CodeofCivilProceduresections1085or1094.5, oranyotherfederal, stateorlocalconstitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, oranydecisionofa courtofcompetentjurisdiction. It is expresslyagreedthattheCityshallhavetherighttoapprove, whichapprovalwillnotbeunreasonablywithheld, thelegalcounselprovidingtheCity's defense, andthatApplicantshallreimbursetheCityforanycostsandexpensesdirectlyandnecessarily incurredbytheCityinthecourseofthedefense. CityshallpromptlynotifytheApplicant Resolution No. 2019- 107

Page 9 of 11 ends

ofanyActionbroughtandCityshallcooperatewithApplicantinthedefenseoftheAction.

Section3. EXECUTIONOFRESOLUTION. TheMayorshallsignthisResolutionandtheClerkoftheCouncilshallattestandcertifytotheadoptionthereof.

ADOPTED this 19th day of November . 2019.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sonia R. Carvalho
CityAttorney
By: c
Lisa Storck
AssistantCityAttorney
AYES: Councilmembers
NOES:

ABSTAIN:

NOT PRESENT:

Councilmembers
Councilmembers
Councilmembers
Iglesias, Penaloza, SarmientoSolorio(4)
BacerraPulido Ville as 3
None ( 0)
None ( 0)

CERTIFICATEOFATTESTATIONANDORIGINALITY
I, DAISYGOMEZ, Clerkof the Council,
ResolutionNo. 2019-107to betheoriginal
Cityof SantaAnaon November19, 2019
Date: //
Resolution No. 2019- 107

Page 10 of 11 ends

do herebyattestto andcertifytheattached
resolutionadoptedby the CityCouncilof the
Daisy Gomez
Clerk of the Council
City of Santa Ana
LS 11. 19. 19

FOR EXHIBITS

REFERENCE

LASERFICHE
Resolution No. 2019-107

Page 11 of 11 ends
← All documents from this meeting