Flores, Dora
From: EbbaChahowskoi <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February
To:! CityClerk
Subject: SupportforCouncilmemberPenaloza'sResolutionOpposingSCAQMDRules1111 and1121
Attention: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachmentsorlinks.
Clerk, Mayor, andmembersof theCouncil:
Thisemailisin supportof CouncilmemberDavidPenaloza'sresolutionto opposeSCAQMD'sproposedrules 1111and1121. Theburdensonpropertyownersandtenantsalikewill bedetrimentalto thequalityof lifein SantaAna.
Shouldtheserulesbeadopted, countlessSantaAnaresidentswouldbedisplacedinorderto replacetheseunits - asmanyolderbuildingswouldneedto beretrofittedandredesignedinorderto accommodatethenew appliances. Additionallytheseburdensomecosts - typicallyover $10,000perinstallation - wouldbebornby alreadyconstrictedpropertyowners - andalreadyburdenedtenants.
Further, theassumedbenefitsfor installingtheseunitsismarginal, andlessreliable. LeavingcountlessSanta Anaresidentsto relyonanelectricgridthathasnotbeenasdependablein recentyears.
Theseimpactsarenotworththeperceivedbenefits, andweurgeyouto supportCouncilmemberPenaloza's resolutionto opposeSCAQMD'sproposedrules1111and1121.
Thankyoufor yourconsideration.
Sincerely, EbbaChahowskoi
1 Flores, Dora
From: AnnaPinter <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February
To:! CityClerk
Subject: SupportforCouncilmemberPenaloza'sResolutionOpposingSCAQMDRules1111 and1121
Attention: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachmentsorlinks.
Clerk, Mayor, and members of the Council: This email is in support of Councilmember David Penaloza's resolution to opposeSCAQMD's proposed rules 1111 and 1121. The burdens on property owners and tenants alike will be detrimental to the quality of life in Santa Ana. Should these rules be adopted, countless Santa Ana residents would be displaced in order to replace these units - as many older buildings would need to be retrofitted and redesigned in order to accommodate the new appliances. Additionally these burdensome costs - typically over $10,000 per installation - would be born by already constricted property owners - and already burdened tenants. Further, the assumed benefits for installing these units is marginal, and less reliable. Leaving countless Santa Ana residents to rely on an electric grid that has not been as dependable in recent years. These impacts are not worth the perceived benefits, and we urge you to support Councilmember Penaloza's resolution to oppose SCAQMD's proposed rules 1111 and 1121. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely,
2 Zuniga, Diana
From: JackieLamirande <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February
To: eComment
Subject: OCCitiesareBadlyServedbytheCountyAnimalShelter. IsReformPossible? Attention: ThisemailoriginatedfromoutsideofCityofSantaAna. Usecautionwhenopeningattachmentsorlinks.
DidyouseetheopinionpieceI publishedinVoiceof OC?
https://voiceofoc.org/2025/02/lamirande-oc-cities-are-badly-served-by-the-county-animal-shelter-is-reform- possible/
ThecityhasacontractwithOCAnimalCare. ThecontractexpiresonMay 302026. Whatareyougoingto doafterwards? Youneedto considermultipleoptions.
Askthecountyto puttheshelteroperationsoutto bid. Non-profitscanthenbidto offersuperiorservicesata lowerprice.
If thecountyrefuses, lookfor localnon-profitsthatcanprovidetheseservicesto thecity.
If youdonothing, you’ll beatthemercyof thecounty. Thecountyisexploitingthecities, runningamediocre shelterandfeedingitsbureaucracywiththecities’ dollars
JackieLamirande
OCResident
Bethechangeyouwanttoseein theworld” - Gandhi
1