Santa Ana City Council
February 17, 2026

5 5
6 8

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Investment Report
Submitted By: Alexander Trinidad, Executive Director Finance and Management Services Agency
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager

City Council
7 –
2 2/17/2026

Investment
Report
City of Santa Ana
As of December 31, 2025
EXHIBIT 1

City Council
7 –
3 2/17/2026

Your Portfolio Principal Cost
LAIF/CLASS $56,402,967.64
Cash $16,613,216.05
BNY Custody Account $294,403,000.21
Total Portfolio $367,419,183.90
Restricted Cash $77,686,380.56 Your Portfolio
Weighted Average Maturity 2.25 years
Weighted Average Yield 3.51%
Your Asset Allocation
Your Maturity Distribution
73,016,184 69,594,094
39,114,260
56,202,891
71,814,272
57,677,482

19.87% 18.94% 10.65% 15.30% 19.54% 15.70%
-
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
70,000,000
80,000,000
Overnight Funds 0-1 year 1-2 years 2-3 years 3-4 years 4-5 years 20%
1%
8%
22%
4%
12%
6%
15%
4%
8%
US Government Agencies
Negotiable CDs
US Treasuries
Corporate Bonds
Municipal Bonds
Mortgage Backed Securities
Asset Backed Securities

LAIF/CLASS
Cash
Commercial Paper
Current Portfolio
City of Santa Ana portfolio as of 12/31/2025
YIELD AND INTEREST INCOME INFORMATION IS ANNUALIZED. ALL YIELD I NFORMATION IS SHOWN GROSS OF ANY ADVISORY AND CUSTODY FEES AND I S BASED ON YIELD TO MATURITY AT COST.

PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT A GUARANTEE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

City Council
7 –
4 2/17/2026

Portfolio Summary

CURRENT
MONTH
Beginning 281,740,554.75
Contributions/Withdrawals 12,000,000.00
Management Fees 0.00
Custodian Fees 0.00
Realized Gains Losses (4,016.50)
Purchased Interest (132,903.60)
Interest Received 799,365.56
ENDING 294,403,000.21

3.61 Weighted Average Yield to Maturity

2.56 Weighted Average Maturity (Y ears)

2.20 Portfolio Effective Duration (Y ears)

2.39 Weighted Average Life (Y ears)
AA-
Average Credit Rating
Custodial Reconciliation
Sector Allocation
• 1 Corporate Bonds 27.20%
• 1 U.S. Agencies 24.05%
• 1 MBS 14.69%
• 1 Commercial Paper 10.24%
• 1 U.S. Treasuries 9.90%
• 1 Asset-Backed Securities 7.05%
• 1 Municipal Bonds 5.08%
• 1 Negotiable CD's 1.63%
• 1 Money Market Funds 0.1 5 %
Maturity Distribution
Projected Monthly Income Schedule

CITY OF SANT A ANA
DECEMBER 31, 2025

City Council
7 –
5 2/17/2026

CITY OF SANT A ANA | DECEMBER 31, 2025
3 CUSIP DESCRIPTION

TRADE DA TE

SETTLE DA TE PAR V ALUE

PRINCIPAL COST

PURCHASED

INTEREST TOT AL COST

YIELD TO

MA TURITY

MA TURITY
DAT E

DA YS TO

MA TURITY

MARKET PRICE

MARKET V ALUE

UNREALIZED

GAIN/LOSS BOOK
V ALUE
% OF
MV

MOODY'S
S&P

RA TING

CITY OF SANT A
ANA

BANK DEPOSITS
00402CASH JPMorgan Chase-
GENERAL 9500
12/31/2025
12/31/2025 14,652,942.79 14,652,942.79

0.00 14,652,942.79 0.00 1 1.00
14,652,942.79

0.00 14,652,942.79 3.97 NA
NA
00396CASH JPMorgan Chase-
WORKERS COMP 37983
12/31/2025
12/31/2025 879,848.67 879,848.67

0.00 879,848.67 0.00 1 1.00
879,848.67

0.00 879,848.67 0.24 NA
NA
00394CASH CITY OF SANT A ANA-

PETTY CASH
12/31/2025
12/31/2025 79,525.00 79,525.00

0.00 79,525.00 0.00 1 1.00
79,525.00

0.00 79,525.00 0.02 NA
NA
00397CASH
JPMorgan Chase-

GENERAL LIABILITY
38130
12/31/2025
12/31/2025 1,000,899.59 1,000,899.59

0.00 1,000,899.59 0.00 1 1.00
1,000,899.59

0.00 1,000,899.59 0.27 NA
NA

BANK DEPOSITS
TOTAL 16,613,216.05 16,613,216.05

0.00 16,613,216.05 0.00 1 1.00
16,613,216.05

0.00 16,613,216.05 4.50 NA
LGIP
CACLASS CALIFORNIA CLASS 12/31/2025
12/31/2025 6,307,521.76 6,307,521.76

0.00 6,307,521.76 3.86 1 1.00
6,307,521.76

0.00 6,307,521.76 1.71 NA
00393CASH Local Agency Investment
Fund-LAIF ARPA
12/31/2025
12/31/2025 11,961,537.48 11,961,537.48

0.00 11,961,537.48 4.03 1 1.00
11,961,537.48

0.00 11,961,537.48 3.24 NA
00391CASH Local Agency Investment
Fund-LAIFCITY
12/31/2025
12/31/2025 38, 133,908.40 38, 133,908.40

0.00 38, 133,908.40 4.03 1 1.00
38, 133,908.40

0.00 38, 133,908.40 10.34 NA
LGIP TOT AL 56,402,967.64 56,402,967.64

0.00 56,402,967.64 4.01 1 1.00
56,402,967.64

0.00 56,402,967.64 15.29 NA

MONEY MARKET
FUNDS
261941108 DREYFUS TRS SEC;INST 12/31/2025
12/31/2025 457, 178.96 457, 178.96

0.00 457, 178.96 3.63 1 1.00
457, 178.96

0.00 457, 178.96 0.1 2 Aaa
AAA

MONEY MARKET
FUNDS TOT AL 457, 178.96 457, 178.96

0.00 457, 178.96 3.63 1 1.00
457, 178.96

0.00 457, 178.96 0.1 2 AAA

COMMERCIAL
PAPER
22533UEB5 CREDIT AGRI NY 05/11/26 08/14/2025
08/14/2025 10,000,000.00 9,700,000.00

0.00 9,700,000.00 4. 12 05/11/2026 131 98.56
9,855,555.56
155,555.56
9,700,000.00 2.67 P-1
A-1
62479MEB5 MUFG BANK NY 05/11/26 08/14/2025
08/14/2025 10,000,000.00 9,698,500.00

0.00 9,698,500.00 4. 15 05/11/2026 131 98.55
9,854,833.33
156,333.33
9,698,500.00 2.67 P-1
A-1
63873KFF9 NA TIXIS NY 06/15/26 10/14/2025
10/14/2025 5,750,000.00 5,601,515.84

0.00 5,601,515.84 3.91 06/15/2026 166 98.25
5,649,590.63
48,074.79
5,601,515.84 1.53 P-1
A-1
63873KGM3 NA TIXIS NY 07 /21/26 11/19/2025
11/20/2025 5,050,000.00 4,917,399.63

0.00 4,917,399.63 3.99 07 /21/2026 202 97.83
4,940,318.21
22,918.58
4,917,399.63 1.34 P-1
A-1

COMMERCIAL
PAPER TOT AL 30,800,000.00 29,917,415.47

0.00 29,917,415.47 4.07 149 98.38
30,300,297.73
382,882.26
29,917,415.47 8.22 A-1
U.S. TREASURIES
Position Statement

City Council
7 –
6 2/17/2026

CITY OF SANT A ANA | DECEMBER 31, 2025
4 CUSIP DESCRIPTION

TRADE DA TE

SETTLE DA TE PAR V ALUE

PRINCIPAL COST

PURCHASED

INTEREST TOT AL COST

YIELD TO

MA TURITY

MA TURITY
DAT E

DA YS TO

MA TURITY

MARKET PRICE

MARKET V ALUE

UNREALIZED

GAIN/LOSS BOOK
V ALUE
% OF
MV

MOODY'S
S&P

RA TING
91282CNH0 US TREASURY 3.875
06/15/28
12/19/2025
12/22/2025 4,000,000.00 4,035, 156.25
2,980.77 4,038, 137.02 3.50 06/15/2028 897 100.85
4,034,062.52
(1,093.73)
4,035, 156.25 1.09 Aa1
AA+
91282CNM9 US TREASURY 3.875
07 /15/28
12/19/2025
12/22/2025 5,000,000.00 5,043,945.31
84,239. 13 5, 128, 184.44 3.51 07 /15/2028 927 100.85
5,042,578. 15
(1,367. 16)
5,043,945.31 1.37 Aa1
AA+
91282CNY3 US TREASURY 3.375
09/15/28
12/19/2025
12/22/2025 5,000,000.00 4,980,859.38
45,683.70 5,026,543.08 3.52 09/15/2028 989 99.60
4,980,078. 15
(781.23)
4,980,859.38 1.35 Aa1
AA+
91282CMA6 US TREASURY 4. 125
11/30/29
12/18/2024
12/19/2024 2, 150,000.00 2, 139,501.95

0.00 2, 139,501.95 4.24 11/30/2029 1,430 101.73
2, 187,289.06
47,787.11
2, 139,501.95 0.59 Aa1
AA+
91282CMZ1 US TREASURY 3.875
04/30/30
05/22/2025
05/23/2025 3,450,000.00 3,413,613.28

0.00 3,413,613.28 4. 11 04/30/2030 1,581 100.80
3,477,492. 19
63,878.91
3,413,613.28 0.94 Aa1
AA+
91282CNK3 US TREASURY 3.875
06/30/30
08/25/2025
08/26/2025 6,000,000.00 6,022,500.00

0.00 6,022,500.00 3.79 06/30/2030 1,642 100.77
6,045,937.50
23,437.50
6,022,500.00 1.64 Aa1
AA+
91282CNN7 US TREASURY 3.875
07 /31/30
08/14/2025
08/15/2025 3,500,000.00 3,508,203. 13
5,528. 19 3,513,731.32 3.82 07 /31/2030 1,673 100.75
3,526,250.00
18,046.87
3,508,203. 13 0.96 Aa1
AA+
U.S. TREASURIES
TOTAL 29, 100,000.00 29, 143,779.30
138,431.79 29,282,211.09 3.73 1,286 100.67
29,293,687.57
149,908.27
29, 143,779.30 7.94 AA+
U.S. AGENCIES
3133EM2C5 FED FARM CR BNKS

0.710 08/10/26 '25
08/10/2021
08/10/2021 6,000,000.00 6,000,000.00

0.00 6,000,000.00 0.71 08/10/2026 222 98. 11
5,886,720.00
(113,280.00)
6,000,000.00 1.60 Aa1
AA+
3130ANQ78 FHLBANKS 0.900
08/27 /26 '25
08/27 /2021
08/27 /2021 6,000,000.00 6,000,000.00

0.00 6,000,000.00 0.90 08/27 /2026 239 98.08
5,884,680.00
(115,320.00)
6,000,000.00 1.60 Aa1
AA+
3130APB79 FHLBANKS 1.000
09/30/26 '25
09/30/2021
09/30/2021 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00

0.00 5,000,000.00 1.00 09/30/2026 273 98. 10
4,904,950.00
(95,050.00)
5,000,000.00 1.33 Aa1
AA+
3130AP3E3 FHLBANKS 0.820
09/30/26
09/30/2021
09/30/2021 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00

0.00 5,000,000.00 0.82 09/30/2026 273 97.79
4,889,600.00
(110,400.00)
5,000,000.00 1.33 Aa1
AA+
3130APQB4 FHLBANKS 1.500
11/23/26 '25
11/23/2021
11/23/2021 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00

0.00 5,000,000.00 1.50 11/23/2026 327 98.01
4,900,350.00
(99,650.00)
5,000,000.00 1.33 Aa1
AA+
3130APVC6 FHLBANKS 1.375 12/01/26
'25
12/14/2021
12/14/2021 5,000,000.00 4,997,500.00

0.00 4,997,500.00 1.39 12/01/2026 335 97.76
4,887,750.00
(109,750.00)
4,997,500.00 1.33 Aa1
AA+
3130AQAB9 FHLBANKS 1.625
12/30/26 '25
12/30/2021
12/30/2021 3,750,000.00 3,750,000.00

0.00 3,750,000.00 1.63 12/30/2026 364 98.07
3,677,437.50
(72,562.50)
3,750,000.00 1.00 Aa1
AA+
3130AQNR0 FHLBANKS 1.750 01/27 /27
'25
01/27 /2022
01/27 /2022 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00

0.00 3,000,000.00 1.75 01/27 /2027 392 98.01
2,940,330.00
(59,670.00)
3,000,000.00 0.80 Aa1
AA+
3130AQKM4 FHLBANKS 1.750
01/28/27 '25
01/28/2022
01/28/2022 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00

0.00 1,500,000.00 1.75 01/28/2027 393 97.82
1,467,315.00
(32,685.00)
1,500,000.00 0.40 Aa1
AA+
3130AQSA2 FHLBANKS 1.830
02/10/27 '25
02/10/2022
02/10/2022 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00

0.00 5,000,000.00 1.83 02/10/2027 406 97.85
4,892,700.00
(107,300.00)
5,000,000.00 1.33 Aa1
AA+
3133ENPB0 FED FARM CR BNKS 2. 180
02/16/27 '25
02/16/2022
02/16/2022 3,500,000.00 3,500,000.00

0.00 3,500,000.00 2. 18 02/16/2027 412 98. 19
3,436,650.00
(63,350.00)
3,500,000.00 0.93 Aa1
AA+
3130AQYA5 FHLBANKS 2.250
02/24/27 '25
02/28/2022
02/28/2022 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00

0.00 1,500,000.00 2.25 02/24/2027 420 98.09
1,471,350.00
(28,650.00)
1,500,000.00 0.40 Aa1
AA+
3130AQW33
FHLBANKS 2.020
02/24/27 '25
02/24/2022
02/24/2022 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00

0.00 5,000,000.00 2.02 02/24/2027 420 97.99
4,899,500.00
(100,500.00)
5,000,000.00 1.33 Aa1
AA+
3130ARC82 FHLBANKS 2. 100
03/29/27
03/29/2022
03/29/2022 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00

0.00 3,000,000.00 2. 10 03/29/2027 453 98. 13
2,943,780.00
(56,220.00)
3,000,000.00 0.80 Aa1
AA+
Position Statement

City Council
7 –
7 2/17/2026

CITY OF SANT A ANA | DECEMBER 31, 2025
5 CUSIP DESCRIPTION

TRADE DA TE

SETTLE DA TE PAR V ALUE

PRINCIPAL COST

PURCHASED

INTEREST TOT AL COST

YIELD TO

MA TURITY

MA TURITY
DAT E

DA YS TO

MA TURITY

MARKET PRICE

MARKET V ALUE

UNREALIZED

GAIN/LOSS BOOK
V ALUE
% OF
MV

MOODY'S
S&P

RA TING
3133ENUH1 FED FARM CR BNKS

3.330 04/12/27 '25
04/12/2022
04/12/2022 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

0.00 2,000,000.00 3.33 04/12/2027 467 99.48
1,989,500.00
(10,500.00)
2,000,000.00 0.54 Aa1
AA+
3133ENVV9 FED FARM CR BNKS

3.630 05/03/27 '25
05/03/2022
05/03/2022 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00

0.00 3,000,000.00 3.63 05/03/2027 488 99.71
2,991,420.00
(8,580.00)
3,000,000.00 0.81 Aa1
AA+
3130B1BC0 FHLBANKS 4.625
06/08/29
07/22/2024
07/23/2024 2,950,000.00 3,001,300.50

0.00 3,001,300.50 4.22 06/08/2029 1,255 103. 17
3,043,456.00
42, 155.50
3,001,300.50 0.83 Aa1
AA+
880591FE7 TVA 3.875 08/01/30 08/14/2025
08/15/2025 6,000,000.00 5,990,280.00
4,520.83 5,994,800.83 3.91 08/01/2030 1,674 100.39
6,023,340.00
33,060.00
5,990,280.00 1.63 Aa1
AA+
U.S. AGENCIES
TOTAL 72,200,000.00 72,239,080.50
4,520.83 72,243,601.33 1.91 498 98.53
71, 130,828.50
(1, 108,252.00)
72,239,080.50 19.29 AA+
MBS
3132XFMR6 FH WN1267 07/31/2024
08/05/2024 5,500,000.00 5,463,261.72

0.00 5,463,261.72 4.51 08/01/2028 944 100.85
5,546,784. 16
83,522.44
5,463,261.72 1.50 Aa1
AA+
3132XGZG4
FH WN2542 05/29/2025
06/03/2025 1,700,000.00 1,703,718.75

0.00 1,703,718.75 4.59 12/01/2028 1,066 101.45
1,724,720. 19
21,001.44
1,703,718.75 0.47 Aa1
AA+
3132XKTM9 FH WN5055 05/14/2025
05/19/2025 3,865,000.00 3,789,360.74

0.00 3,789,360.74 4.60 07 /01/2029 1,278 99.98
3,864,212.93
74,852. 19
3,789,360.74 1.05 Aa1
AA+
3137HFF59 FHMS K-527 A2 4.618
07 /25/2029
08/13/2024
08/22/2024 2,400,000.00 2,441,937.60

0.00 2,441,937.60 4. 16 07 /25/2029 1,302 102.03
2,448,610. 18
6,672.58
2,441,937.60 0.66 Aa1
AA+
3140NWBC8 FN BZ1834 10/07/2024
10/10/2024 6,000,000.00 5,941,406.25

0.00 5,941,406.25 4.30 09/01/2029 1,340 100.20
6,011,786.88
70,380.63
5,941,406.25 1.63 Aa1
AA+
3132XKVZ7 FH WN5131 08/13/2025
08/18/2025 3,062,276.52 3,088, 114.48

0.00 3,088, 114.48 4.25 10/01/2029 1,370 101.33
3, 102,918.90
14,804.42
3,088, 114.48 0.84 Aa1
AA+
3132XKWE3 FH WN5144 01/24/2025
01/29/2025 3,725,000.00 3,608,593.75

0.00 3,608,593.75 4.67 10/01/2029 1,370 99.90
3,721, 124.62
112,530.87
3,608,593.75 1.01 Aa1
AA+
3132XKXN2 FH WN5184 08/13/2025
08/18/2025 5,000,000.00 5,031,835.94

0.00 5,031,835.94 4.33 11/01/2029 1,401 101. 17
5,058,546.65
26,710.71
5,031,835.94 1.37 Aa1
AA+
3137HJ5Y9 FHMS K-534 A2 4.7
11/25/2029
01/24/2025
01/30/2025 2,000,000.00 1,993,510.00

0.00 1,993,510.00 4.70 11/25/2029 1,425 102.37
2,047,309.58
53,799.58
1,993,510.00 0.56 Aa1
AA+
3140NW7A7 FN BZ2688 12/18/2024
12/27/2024 3,000,000.00 2,981,250.00

0.00 2,981,250.00 4.65 12/01/2029 1,431 101.56
3,046,783. 14
65,533. 14
2,981,250.00 0.83 Aa1
AA+
3137HN6B9 FHMS K-547 A2 4.421
05/25/2030
09/23/2025
09/29/2025 1,750,000.00 1,776, 195.75

0.00 1,776, 195.75 4.00 05/25/2030 1,606 101.50
1,776, 195.75

0.00 1,776, 195.75 0.48 Aa1
AA+
3140Q0SB9 FN BZ5013 11/17 /2025
11/20/2025 5, 100,000.00 5, 131,277.34

0.00 5, 131,277.34 4.02 09/01/2030 1,705 100.34
5, 117, 174.30
(14, 103.04)
5, 131,277.34 1.39 Aa1
AA+
MBS TOT AL 43, 102,276.52 42,950,462.32

0.00 42,950,462.32 4.39 1,347 100.85
43,466, 167.28
515,704.96
42,950,462.32 11.78 AA+

NEGOTIABLE CD'S
06417NF73 BANK OZK 0.600
05/12/26
11/12/2021
11/12/2021 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 0.60 05/12/2026 132 98.44
244, 124.83
(3,875. 17)
248,000.00 0.07 NA
NA
02568KAJ4 LUMINA TE BANK 0.700
05/27 /26
11/26/2021
11/26/2021 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 0.70 05/27 /2026 147 98.30
243,790. 10
(4,209.90)
248,000.00 0.07 NA
NA
45776NEN2 INSBNK 0.900 06/19/26 12/20/2021
12/20/2021 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 0.90 06/19/2026 170 98. 14
243,386.75
(4,613.25)
248,000.00 0.07
NA
NA
Position Statement

City Council
7 –
8 2/17/2026

CITY OF SANT A ANA | DECEMBER 31, 2025
6 CUSIP DESCRIPTION

TRADE DA TE

SETTLE DA TE PAR V ALUE

PRINCIPAL COST

PURCHASED

INTEREST TOT AL COST

YIELD TO

MA TURITY

MA TURITY
DAT E

DA YS TO

MA TURITY

MARKET PRICE

MARKET V ALUE

UNREALIZED

GAIN/LOSS BOOK
V ALUE
% OF
MV

MOODY'S
S&P

RA TING
15721UET2 CFBANK 0.850 07 /10/26 11/10/2021
11/10/2021 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 0.85 07 /10/2026 191 97.89
242,772. 17
(5,227.83)
248,000.00 0.07 NA
NA
292079AR1 EMPIRE ST BNK 0.900
07 /13/26
11/12/2021
11/12/2021 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 0.90 07 /13/2026 194 97.94
242,883.51
(5, 116.49)
248,000.00 0.07 NA
NA
87165FD76 SYNCHRONY BANK 1. 100
11/05/26
11/05/2021
11/05/2021 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 1. 10 11/05/2026 309 96.92
240,351.62
(7,648.38)
248,000.00 0.07 NA
NA
549104ZS9 LUANA SAVINGS 0.600
11/05/26
11/05/2021
11/05/2021 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 0.60 11/05/2026 309 96.51
239,341.01
(8,658.99)
248,000.00 0.06 NA
NA
59013KPN0 MERRICK BANK 1. 100
11/09/26
11/09/2021
11/09/2021 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 1. 10 11/09/2026 313 96.85
240, 199.30
(7,800.70)
248,000.00 0.07 NA
NA
70962LAV4 PENT AGON FEDERA

1.000 11/10/26
11/10/2021
11/10/2021 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 1.00 11/10/2026 314 96.76
239,967.38
(8,032.62)
248,000.00 0.07 NA
NA
89235MMB4 TOYOT A FINL SVGS 1. 100
11/12/26
11/12/2021
11/12/2021 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 1. 10 11/12/2026 316 96.84
240, 174.22
(7,825.78)
248,000.00 0.07 NA
NA
73319FBJ7 POPPY BNK 0.800
11/17 /26
11/17 /2021
11/17 /2021 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 0.80 11/17 /2026 321 96.52
239,373.85
(8,626. 15)
248,000.00 0.06 NA
NA
30781JAW0 FARMERS BK 0.850
11/19/26
11/19/2021
11/19/2021 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 0.85 11/19/2026 323 96.54
239,429.02
(8,570.98)
248,000.00 0.06 NA
NA
856285YQ8 ST A TE BANK NY 1. 150
11/30/26
11/29/2021
11/29/2021 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 1. 15 11/30/2026 334 97.84
242,638.24
(5,361.76)
248,000.00 0.07 NA
NA
58404DMQ1 MEDALLION BANK 1.250
12/21/26
12/20/2021
12/20/2021 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 1.25 12/21/2026 355 96.61
239,581.62
(8,418.39)
248,000.00 0.06 NA
NA
14042TEP8 CAPITL ONE NA 2.000
03/16/27
03/16/2022
03/16/2022 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 2.00 03/16/2027 440 98. 15
243,407.04
(4,592.96)
248,000.00 0.07 NA
NA
02589ABT8 AM EX BK 2.000 03/16/27 03/16/2022
03/16/2022 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 2.00 03/16/2027 440 98. 15
243,407.04
(4,592.96)
248,000.00 0.07
NA
NA
07371AH22 MONET BANK 2.250
03/24/27
03/30/2022
03/30/2022 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 2.25 03/24/2027 448 98.41
244,066.72
(3,933.28)
248,000.00 0.07 NA
NA
07371CT25 BEAL BNK US 2.250
03/24/27
03/30/2022
03/30/2022 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 2.25 03/24/2027 448 96.97
240,497.97
(7,502.03)
248,000.00 0.07 NA
NA
61773TCX9 MSBNA 2.250 03/30/27
'26
03/31/2022
03/31/2022 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 2.25 03/30/2027 454 96.97
240,473.37
(7,526.63)
248,000.00 0.07 NA
NA
61768U3U9 MORGAN PVT BNK 2.250
03/30/27 '26
03/31/2022
03/31/2022 248,000.00 248,000.00

0.00 248,000.00 2.25 03/30/2027 454 96.97
240,473.37
(7,526.63)
248,000.00 0.07 NA
NA

NEGOTIABLE CD'S
TOTAL 4,960,000.00 4,960,000.00

0.00 4,960,000.00 1.30 320 97.39
4,830,339. 11
(129,660.89)
4,960,000.00 1.31 NA

MUNICIPAL
BONDS
13063DC48 CALIFORNIA ST 1.700
02/01/28
07/25/2024
07/26/2024 3, 120,000.00 2,853,302.40

0.00 2,853,302.40 4.35 02/01/2028 762 96. 13
2,999,280.96
145,978.56
2,853,302.40 0.81 Aa2
AA-
79773KPC2 SAN FRANCISCO CALIF
CITY & 4.670 06/15/28
01/15/2025
01/30/2025 1,335,000.00 1,342,876.50

0.00 1,342,876.50 4.48 06/15/2028 897 101.77
1,358,566.76
15,690.26
1,342,876.50 0.37 Aa1
AA+
283062DS3 EL DORADO CALIF IRR
DIST RE 2.055 03/01/29
07/30/2024
07/31/2024 2,500,000.00 2,260,300.00

0.00 2,260,300.00 4.39 03/01/2029 1, 156 94.75
2,368,737.50
108,437.50
2,260,300.00 0.64 Aa3
AA-
79773KPD0 SAN FRANCISCO CALIF
CITY & 4.800 06/15/29
01/15/2025
01/30/2025 4,015,000.00 4,045,875.35

0.00 4,045,875.35 4.61 06/15/2029 1,262 102.53
4, 116,563.44
70,688.09
4,045,875.35 1. 12 Aa1
AA+
Position Statement

City Council
7 –
9 2/17/2026

CITY OF SANT A ANA | DECEMBER 31, 2025
7 CUSIP DESCRIPTION

TRADE DA TE

SETTLE DA TE PAR V ALUE

PRINCIPAL COST

PURCHASED

INTEREST TOT AL COST

YIELD TO

MA TURITY

MA TURITY
DAT E

DA YS TO

MA TURITY

MARKET PRICE

MARKET V ALUE

UNREALIZED

GAIN/LOSS BOOK
V ALUE
% OF
MV

MOODY'S
S&P

RA TING
13063EGT7 CALIFORNIA ST 4.500
08/01/29
11/05/2024
11/06/2024 4,075,000.00 4,092,685.50

0.00 4,092,685.50 4.40 08/01/2029 1,309 102.38
4, 171,870.90
79, 185.40
4,092,685.50 1. 13 Aa2
AA-

MUNICIPAL
BONDS TOT AL 15,045,000.00 14,595,039.75

0.00 14,595,039.75 4.45 1, 125 99.91
15,015,019.56
419,979.81
14,595,039.75 4.07 AA

ASSET -BACKED

SECURITIES
437918AC9 HONDO-241-A3 11/04/2024
11/05/2024 5,330,351. 11 5,391,358.64

0.00 5,391,358.64 4.79 08/15/2028 958 100.88
5,377,383.67
(13,974.97)
5,391,358.64 1.46 Aaa
AAA
14041NGE5 COMET -241-A 11/12/2024
11/13/2024 5,000,000.00 4,911,718.75

0.00 4,911,718.75 4.32 09/17 /2029 1,356 100.30
5,014,808. 15
103,089.40
4,911,718.75 1.36 NA
AAA
43814VAC1 HONDO-251-A3 02/04/2025
02/11/2025 2,000,000.00 1,999,938.40

0.00 1,999,938.40 4.57 09/21/2029 1,360 101.06
2,021, 111.02
21, 172.62
1,999,938.40 0.55 NA
AAA
096924AD7 BMWOT -25A-A3 02/04/2025
02/12/2025 4,350,000.00 4,349,571.52

0.00 4,349,571.52 4.56 09/25/2029 1,364 101.01
4,393,819.03
44,247.51
4,349,571.52 1. 19 Aaa
AAA
02582JKM1 AXCMT -251-A
02/04/2025
02/11/2025 4,000,000.00 3,999, 111.60

0.00 3,999, 111.60 4.57 12/17 /2029 1,447 101.56
4,062,350.84
63,239.24
3,999, 111.60 1. 10 NA
AAA

ASSET -BACKED

SECURITIES
TOTAL
20,680,351. 11 20,651,698.91

0.00 20,651,698.91 4.57 1,273 100.92
20,869,472.71
217,773.80
20,651,698.91 5.66 AAA

CORPORA TE
BONDS
24422EXV6 JOHN DEERE CAP 4.200
07 /15/27 MTN
09/03/2024
09/06/2024 6,000,000.00 6,006,960.00

0.00 6,006,960.00 4. 16 07 /15/2027 561 100.72
6,043, 140.00
36, 180.00
6,006,960.00 1.64 A1
A
48128GU99 JP MORGAN 1.250
07 /31/27 '26 MTN
10/02/2024
10/03/2024 4,500,000.00 4, 119,300.00

0.00 4, 119,300.00 4.47 07 /31/2027 577 94.96
4,272,975.00
153,675.00
4, 119,300.00 1. 16 A1
A
478160DH4 JOHNSON&JOHNSON

4.550 03/01/28 '28
02/18/2025
02/20/2025 5,000,000.00 5,000,200.00

0.00 5,000,200.00 4.55 03/01/2028 791 101.89
5,094,450.00
94,250.00
5,000,200.00 1.38 Aaa
AAA
14913UAY6 CTRPLLR FIN SERV

4.400 03/03/28 MTN
08/14/2025
08/15/2025 5,000,000.00 5,051,550.00

0.00 5,051,550.00 3.97 03/03/2028 793 101. 10
5,055, 150.00
3,600.00
5,051,550.00 1.37 A2
NA
931142FB4 WALMART 3.900
04/15/28 '28
09/17/2024
09/18/2024 5,625,000.00 5,673,262.50

0.00 5,673,262.50 3.64 04/15/2028 836 100.51
5,653,406.25
(19,856.25)
5,673,262.50 1.53 Aa2
AA
053015AG8 ADP 1.700 05/15/28 '28 08/14/2025
08/15/2025 5,000,000.00 4,721,900.00

0.00 4,721,900.00 3.85 05/15/2028 866 95.50
4,774,850.00
52,950.00
4,721,900.00 1.29 Aa3
AA-
437076BW1 HOME DEPOT 3.900
12/06/28 '28
04/22/2025
04/23/2025 5,000,000.00 4,941,500.00

0.00 4,941,500.00 4.25 12/06/2028 1,071 100.40
5,020,050.00
78,550.00
4,941,500.00 1.36 A2
A
89236TLL7 TOYOT A MOTOR CRD

4.650 01/05/29 MTN
08/14/2025
08/15/2025 5,000,000.00 5,086,600.00
25,833.33 5, 112,433.33 4. 10 01/05/2029 1, 101 101.80
5,090, 150.00
3,550.00
5,086,600.00 1.38 A1
A+
89236TMF9 TOYOT A MOTOR CRD

5.050 05/16/29 MTN
07/24/2024
07/25/2024 4,000,000.00 4,058,560.00

0.00 4,058,560.00 4.70 05/16/2029 1,232 103. 17
4, 126,840.00
68,280.00
4,058,560.00 1. 12 A1
A+
713448FX1 PEPSICO 4.500 07 /17 /29
'29
07/22/2024
07/23/2024 3,000,000.00 2,993, 100.00

0.00 2,993, 100.00 4.55 07 /17 /2029 1,294 101.95
3,058,380.00
65,280.00
2,993, 100.00 0.83 A1
A+
713448GB8 PEPSICO 4.600 02/07 /30
'30
02/06/2025
02/07/2025 3,000,000.00 2,992,980.00

0.00 2,992,980.00 4.65 02/07 /2030 1,499 102.27
3,068,040.00
75,060.00
2,992,980.00 0.83 A1
A+
478160DJ0 JOHNSON&JOHNSON

4.700 03/01/30 '30
02/19/2025
03/03/2025 4,500,000.00 4,507,695.00

0.00 4,507,695.00 4.66 03/01/2030 1,521 103.05
4,637,025.00
129,330.00
4,507,695.00 1.26 Aaa
AAA
Position Statement

City Council
7 –
10 2/17/2026

CITY OF SANT A ANA | DECEMBER 31, 2025
8 CUSIP DESCRIPTION

TRADE DA TE

SETTLE DA TE PAR V ALUE

PRINCIPAL COST

PURCHASED

INTEREST TOT AL COST

YIELD TO

MA TURITY

MA TURITY
DAT E

DA YS TO

MA TURITY

MARKET PRICE

MARKET V ALUE

UNREALIZED

GAIN/LOSS BOOK
V ALUE
% OF
MV

MOODY'S
S&P

RA TING
742718FH7 PROCTER GAMBLE

3.000 03/25/30
10/10/2025
10/14/2025 5,000,000.00 4,808,650.00
7,916.67 4,816,566.67 3.95 03/25/2030 1,545 96.42
4,821,000.00
12,350.00
4,808,650.00 1.31 Aa3
AA-
037833DU1 APPLE 1.650 05/11/30 '30 06/25/2025
06/26/2025 6,000,000.00 5,346, 180.00

0.00 5,346, 180.00 4. 14 05/11/2030 1,592 90.97
5,458,200.00
112,020.00
5,346, 180.00 1.48 Aaa
AA+
023135BS4 AMAZON.COM 1.500
06/03/30 '30
06/24/2025
06/25/2025 5,000,000.00 4,405,500.00

0.00 4,405,500.00 4. 19 06/03/2030 1,615 90. 11
4,505,300.00
99,800.00
4,405,500.00 1.22 A1
AA
58933YBQ7 MERCK & CO 4. 150
09/15/30 '30
10/10/2025
10/14/2025 5,000,000.00 5,018,850.00
20, 173.61 5,039,023.61 4.06 09/15/2030 1,719 100.29
5,014,500.00
(4,350.00)
5,018,850.00 1.36 Aa3
A+
30303MAB8 MET A PLA TFORMS 4.200
11/15/30 '30
11/17 /2025
11/18/2025 4,750,000.00 4,755,557.50
8,312.50 4,763,870.00 4. 17 11/15/2030 1,780 100. 18
4,758,645.00
3,087.50
4,755,557.50 1.29 Aa3
AA-

CORPORA TE
BONDS TOT AL 81,375,000.00 79,488,345.00
62,236. 11 79,550,581. 11 4.21 1, 180 99.03
80,452, 101.25
963,756.25
79,488,345.00 21.81 A+

CITY OF SANTA
ANA TOT AL 370,735,990.28 367,419, 183.90
205, 188.73 367,624,372.63 3.51 749 368,831,276.36
1,412,092.46
367,419, 183.90 100.00 AA-
GRAND TOT AL 370,735,990.28 367,419, 183.90
205, 188.73 367,624,372.63 3.51 749 368,831,276.36
1,412,092.46
367,419, 183.90 100.00 AA-
Position Statement

City Council
7 –
11 2/17/2026

CITY OF SANT A ANA | DECEMBER 31, 2025
9 Transaction Statement

CITY OF SANT A ANA

TRADE DA TE SETTLE DA TE CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR V ALUE PRINCIPAL COST

PURCHASED

INTEREST TOTAL

PURCHASE
YIELD
BUY
12/19/2025 12/22/2025 91282CNH0 US TREASURY 3.875 06/15/28 4,000,000.00 4,035, 156.25 2,980.77 (4,038, 137.02) 3.50 12/19/2025 12/22/2025 91282CNY3 US TREASURY 3.375 09/15/28 5,000,000.00 4,980,859.38 45,683.70 (5,026,543.08) 3.52 12/19/2025 12/22/2025 91282CNM9 US TREASURY 3.875 07 /15/28 5,000,000.00 5,043,945.31 84,239. 13 (5, 128, 184.44) 3.51 BUY TOT AL 14,000,000.00 14,059,960.94 132,903.60 (14, 192,864.54) 3.51

TRADE DA TE SETTLE DA TE CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR V ALUE BOOK V ALUE TOTAL NET

REALIZED

GAIN/LOSS

MA TURITY
12/22/2025 12/22/2025 38149MR47 Goldman Sachs Bank USA 1.0 12/22/2025 (248,000.00) 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.00 MA TURITY TOT AL (248,000.00) 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.00

TRADE DA TE SETTLE DA TE CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR V ALUE BOOK V ALUE TOTAL NET

REALIZED

GAIN/LOSS

PRINCIPAL PA YDOWN
12/15/2025 12/15/2025 437918AC9 HONDO-241-A3 (348,629.03) 352,619.20 348,629.03 (3,990. 17) 12/26/2025 12/26/2025 3132XKVZ7 FH WN5131 (3, 119.97) 3, 146.30 3, 119.97 (26.33)

PRINCIPAL PA YDOWN
TOTAL (351,749.00) 355,765.49 351,749.00 (4,016.49)

City Council
7 –
12 2/17/2026

CITY OF SANT A ANA | DECEMBER 31, 2025
10 Income/Dividend Received

IDENTIFIER DESCRIPTION PA YMENT DA TE POST DA TE

INTEREST /DIVIDENDS

RECEIVED
BONY
856285YQ8 ST A TE BANK NY 1. 150 11/30/26 11/29/2025 12/01/2025 1,437.72 3130APVC6 FHLBANKS 1.375 12/01/26 '25 12/01/2025 12/01/2025 34,375.00 91282CMA6 US TREASURY 4. 125 11/30/29 11/30/2025 12/01/2025 44,343.75 261941108 DREYFUS TRS SEC;INST 11/28/2025 12/02/2025 2,763.81 023135BS4 AMAZON.COM 1.500 06/03/30 '30 12/03/2025 12/03/2025 37,500.00 437076BW1 HOME DEPOT 3.900 12/06/28 '28 12/06/2025 12/08/2025 97,500.00 3130B1BC0 FHLBANKS 4.625 06/08/29 12/08/2025 12/08/2025 68,218.75 59013KPN0 MERRICK BANK 1. 100 11/09/26 12/09/2025 12/09/2025 224.22 70962LAV4 PENT AGON FEDERA 1.000 11/10/26 12/10/2025 12/10/2025 203.84 15721UET2 CFBANK 0.850 07 /10/26 12/10/2025 12/10/2025 173.26 06417NF73 BANK OZK 0.600 05/12/26 12/12/2025 12/12/2025 122.30 79773KPC2 SAN FRANCISCO CALIF CITY & 4.670 06/15/28 12/15/2025 12/15/2025 31, 172.25 79773KPD0 SAN FRANCISCO CALIF CITY & 4.800 06/15/29 12/15/2025 12/15/2025 96,360.00 14041NGE5 COMET -241-A 12/15/2025 12/15/2025 16,333.34
437918AC9 HONDO-241-A3 12/15/2025 12/15/2025 24,656.24
02582JKM1 AXCMT -251-A 12/15/2025 12/15/2025 15,200.00
73319FBJ7 POPPY BNK 0.800 11/17 /26 12/17 /2025 12/17 /2025 163.07 30781JAW0 FARMERS BK 0.850 11/19/26 12/19/2025 12/19/2025 173.26 45776NEN2 INSBNK 0.900 06/19/26 12/20/2025 12/22/2025 183.45 38149MR47 Goldman Sachs Bank USA 1.0 12/22/2025 12/22/2025 12/22/2025 1,243.40 58404DMQ1 MEDALLION BANK 1.250 12/21/26 12/20/2025 12/22/2025 254.79 43814VAC1 HONDO-251-A3 12/21/2025 12/22/2025 7,616.67
3132XKVZ7 FH WN5131 12/01/2025 12/26/2025 11,622.96
3140NW7A7 FN BZ2688 12/01/2025 12/26/2025 11,287.50
02568KAJ4 LUMINA TE BANK 0.700 05/27 /26 12/26/2025 12/26/2025 142.68 3132XKTM9 FH WN5055 12/01/2025 12/26/2025 13,205.42
3137HFF59 FHMS K-527 A2 4.618 07 /25/2029 12/01/2025 12/26/2025 9,236.00 3132XKXN2 FH WN5184 12/01/2025 12/26/2025 18,750.00

City Council
7 –
13 2/17/2026

CITY OF SANT A ANA | DECEMBER 31, 2025
11 Income/Dividend Received
3132XKWE3 FH WN5144 12/01/2025 12/26/2025 12,416.67
3137HN6B9 FHMS K-547 A2 4.421 05/25/2030 12/01/2025 12/26/2025 6,447.29 096924AD7 BMWOT -25A-A3 12/25/2025 12/26/2025 16,530.00 3137HJ5Y9 FHMS K-534 A2 4.7 11/25/2029 12/01/2025 12/26/2025 7,833.33 3140Q0SB9 FN BZ5013 12/01/2025 12/26/2025 17,935.00
3140NWBC8 FN BZ1834 12/01/2025 12/26/2025 20,400.00
3132XGZG4 FH WN2542 12/01/2025 12/26/2025 6,729. 17
3132XFMR6 FH WN1267 12/01/2025 12/26/2025 19,891.67
3130AQAB9 FHLBANKS 1.625 12/30/26 '25 12/30/2025 12/30/2025 30,468.75 91282CNK3 US TREASURY 3.875 06/30/30 12/31/2025 12/31/2025 116,250.00 BONY - TOT AL 799,365.56
TOTAL 799,365.56

City Council
7 –
14 2/17/2026

Meeder provides monthly statements for its investment management clients to provide information about the investment portfolio. The information should not be used for audit or confirmation purposes. Please review your custodial statements and report any inaccuracies or discrepancies.

Certain information and data has been supplied by unaffiliated third parties. Although Meeder believes the information is reliable, it cannot warrant the accuracy of information offered by third parties. Market value may reflect prices received from pricing vendors when current market quotations are not available. Prices may not reflect firm bids or offers and may differ from the value at which the security can be sold.

Statements may include positions from unmanaged accounts provided for reporting purposes. Unmanaged accounts are managed directly by the client and are not included in the accounts managed by Meeder. This information is provided as a client convenience and Meeder assumes no responsibility for performance of these accounts or the accuracy of the data reported.

Investing involves risk. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Debt and fixed income securities are subject to credit and interest rate risk. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investors shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted.

Meeder Public Funds, Inc. is a registered investment adviser and affiliate of Meeder Investment Management, Inc. Investment advisory services are provided through Meeder Public Funds, Inc. Please contact us if you would like to receive a copy of our current ADV disclosure brochure or privacy policy. © 2026 Meeder Investment Management
meederpublicfunds.com | 866.633.3371
Disclosure

City Council
7 –
15 2/17/2026

Investments Amount
Bank of New York Mellon - Investment Custodian 294,403,000.21 Local Agency Investment Fund (L.A.I.F) 38,133,908.40
Local Agency Investment Fund (L.A.I.F) - ARPA 11,961,537.48 California CLASS 6,307,521.76
Total - Investments $ 350,805,967.85
Cash Held at City Financial Institution(s) and Cash on Hand Amount General Account 14,652,942.79
General Liability Account 1,000,899.59
Workers Compensation Account 879,848.67
Petty Cash 79,525.00
Total - Cash Held at City Financial
Institution(s) and Cash on Hand $ 16,613,216.05
Restricted Cash Amount
Signature Bank - Streetlight Project 1,268,869.87
2024 Water Bond 17,815,203.06
US Bank - Pension Stability Funds (Section 115 Trust with PARS) 49,755,441.71 State of California Condemnation Fund - Right of Way Deposits 687,525.00 Various US Bank & BNY 160,206.66
Housing Account 6,549,174.90
Santa Ana Federal Credit Union - Family Self Sufficiency (FSS-Housing) 805,598.59 Commissary Account 313,544.81
Flexible Benefit Spending Account 330,815.96
Total - Restricted Cash $ 77,686,380.56
Total Cash Held City at Financial Institution(s), Cash on Hand and Restricted Cash $ 445,105,564.46 Cash by Fund(s) - Total (see below for listing) $ 445,105,564.46

DATA PROVIDED AND VERIFIED BY THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
City General Ledger Cash Summary

City Council
7 –
16 2/17/2026

DATA PROVIDED AND VERIFIED BY THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
Fund Fund description Amount
011 GENERAL FUND 129,993,195.10
012 CANNABIS PUBLIC BENEFIT 18,483,431.66
016 CASP CERTIFICATION & TRAINING 688,985.67
020 OTS-TRAFFIC OFFENDER PROGRAM 25,854.92
021 PRCSA CATV FUND 1,816,284.04
022 PRCSA FEE & DONATION 288,749.58
023 INMATE WELFARE FUND 3,096,430.18
024 PD ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES LEAGUE (449,655.16)
025 IDB & EZ VOUCHER MONITORING 208,199.82
026 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 387,103.96
027 PARKING FUND 3,454,911.23
029 SPECIAL GAS TAX 29,432,817.54
030 PROP 1B BOND ACT OF 2006 161,263.02
031 AIR QUALITY IMPR. (AB 2766) 593,587.76
032 MEASURE M-STREET CONSTRUCTION (3,722,421.52)
033 NEW TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA B 603,543.11
034 NEW TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA E 1,770,338.73
035 NEW TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA F 2,072,102.35
041 TRANSP SYS IMPR AREA A-2 733,976.21
042 TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA B 20,180.18
043 TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA C 97,057.46
044 TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA D 18,476.78
048 TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA C-2 355,948.40
049 TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA G 114,463.93
051 CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 2,557,342.65
053 CITY SERVICES 8,557,639.62
054 SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL 7,818,958.15
055 SEWER CONNECTION FEE 4,924,219.48
056 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 10,754,083.56
057 FED CLEAN WATER PROTECTION ENT 5,489,137.06
058 RESIDENTIAL STREET IMPROVEMENT 7,681,252.46
059 SELECT STREET CONSTRUCTION 23,926,601.61
060 WATER REVENUE 40,556,483.40
066 ACQUISITION & CONSTRUCTION (3,635,103.36)
067 REGIONAL TRANSP CENTER 1,090,335.32
068 SANITATION FUND 2,275,428.77
069 REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICE 7,924,332.81
070 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 5,944,144.39
073 BUILDING MAINT FUND 1,728,433.48

City Council
7 –
17 2/17/2026

DATA PROVIDED AND VERIFIED BY THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
Fund Fund description Amount
074 CIVIC CENTER MAINTENANCE (393,806.67)
075 FLEET MAINTENANCE/STORES 1,659,057.01
078 RETIREMENT SYSTEM (5,063,793.17)
080 LIABILITY AND PROPERTY INS FND 7,572,846.93
081 EMPLOYEE GROUP INSURANCE 5,254,769.69
082 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND 18,298,776.31
083 PAYROLL REVOLVING 7,195,834.26
085 CITY YARD OPERATION (785,159.74)
087 PT RETIREMENT FUND 7,117.95
089 CA SEISMIC HAZARD PROGRAM 42,556.15
090 ORANGE CO SANITATION DIST 2&3 621,498.89
095 POLICE COMMISSARY ACCOUNT 274,204.49
096 SA TOURISM MARKETING DISTRICT 130,990.17
097 POLICE SEIZED ASSETS 2,893,648.40
100 SECTION 457 FIDUCIARY ADMIN 46,406.66
101 PUB WKS-ADMIN & PLANNING 3,554,823.86
103 PMA RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE 9,788.99
104 SEIU RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE 60,496.44
106 EM/SAMA RETIREE HEALTH INSUR 14,820.12
107 CASA RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE 5,870.03
109 INFO SYS STRATEGIC PLAN 15,769,932.10
110 STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTATION 119,054.88
111 OPIOID REMEDIATION 4,606,479.51
120 FIRE FACILITIES FUND 2,953,567.61
121 SPECIAL REPAIR/DEMOLITION 781,030.57
122 EMERGENCY & HEALTH GRANTS 3,113,394.10
123 WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT (1,624,212.01)
124 ORANGE COUNTY SSA GRANTS (19,772.61)
125 OES UASI (975,597.37)
127 D.O.J. GRANT FUND (256,486.42)
128 POLICE BLOCK GRANTS 2,558,639.77
130 HOME PROGRAM FEDERAL GRANT 4,053,410.17
131 MISC GRANTS 302,087.64
133 HOUSING AUTHORITY-ISSUER FEE 1,898,490.41
135 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT (875,150.66)
136 HOUSING AUTHORITY-VOUCHER HAP 1,669,932.53
137 HOUSING AUTHORITY- NED 564.69
138 HOUSING AUTHORITY-MS 5 54,558.19
139 HOUSING AUTHORITY-NEW CONSTR 533,861.31

City Council
7 –
18 2/17/2026

DATA PROVIDED AND VERIFIED BY THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
Fund Fund description Amount
140 HOUSING AUTHORITY-VOUCHER ADM 3,940,168.40
142 NSP FEDERAL GRANT 445,091.68
143 CALHOME MFGD HSG LOAN 22,033.21
144 PRISON TO EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM (82,852.40)
145 RENTAL REHABILITATION GRANT 10,957.39
147 FEDERAL AID SAFETY PROGRAM (2,502,766.92)
148 TRAFFIC SYSTEM MGMT GRANT (12,475,293.49)
149 WIC ASSESSMENT DIST ST IMPRV 34,437.08
152 PUBLIC LIBRARY GRANT FUND 1,667,697.11
158 PLANNING GRANTS PROGRAM 1,439,372.14
161 PRCSA CAPITAL GRANTS (2,477,210.96)
164 PUB WKS-WTR QUALITY & CONTROL (6,483,680.98)
165 OFFICE OF SAFETY GRANT 269,202.98
166 US DOJ ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 2,203,908.71
167 US TREASURY ASSET FORFEITURE 215,722.68
169 RECREATION GRANTS FUND 437,526.57
177 EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PG 11,273.94
179 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS 111,650.04
180 ARPA EHV ADMIN FEES 108,238.76
181 AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT 13,491,269.04
182 HOME-ARP PROGRAM FEDERAL GRANT (5,120.04)
183 ARPA - CA FOR ALL YOUTH WDP (414,091.27)
185 RENT STABILIZATION 3,262,087.45
186 HCV F S S FORFEITURES 404,068.65
201 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 1 139.37
202 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 2 1,503.73
203 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 3 794,316.54
204 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 4 1,110.49
205 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 5 630.92
206 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 6 926.07
207 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 7 204,275.00
209 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 9 770.62
210 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 10 18,063.05
211 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 11 234.21
212 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 12 13.81
213 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA NO 13 2,837.77
221 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA I 1,203,327.96
222 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA II 607,535.44
223 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA III 218,536.03

City Council
7 –
19 2/17/2026

DATA PROVIDED AND VERIFIED BY THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
Fund Fund description Amount
224 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA IV 743,860.25
225 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA V 418,176.60
226 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA VI 374,499.54
301 REC/COMM SVS 6,305.99
311 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP DISTRICT 1 1,310,438.47
312 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP DISTRICT 2 5,654,149.45
313 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP DISTRICT 3 8,292,104.17
314 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP DISTRICT 4 607,600.98
315 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP HARBOR SPECFIC 916,831.66
404 COSA 2014 LEASE FINANCING (338,711.27)
406 2021 PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS 17,331.45
417 INCLUSIONARY HOUSING FEE 5,481,630.78
418 CDA - PEEBLER CAPITAL FUND (935,639.24)
607 HOUSING AUTHORITY LMIHF 3,998,128.70
655 2018A SERIES TAX ALLOC BOND 37,130.12
670 COSA RDA 668,900.03
671 COSA RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT 291,798.38
981 EASTERN FOOTHILL TRANS CORRIDO 13,056.00
991 TRAN SYS IMP AUT C-2 TUSTIN 2,446,936.23
992 TRAN SYS IMP AUT AREA D-TUSTIN 9,902,337.37
993 WIC ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 467,865.92
999 Lawson Clearing 4,763.32
Reconciling Item(s) - Outstanding Checks * 1,565,975.73 Reconciling Item(s) - Bank Direct Deposits* 3,188,859.72 Reconciling Item(s) - Deposits in Transit* (474,371.27) Withdrawals in Transit (375,115.82)
Reconciling Item(s) - Various* $ 230,164.89

City Council
7 –
20 2/17/2026

Human Resources Department
www.santa-ana.org/humanresources
Item # 8
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
February 17, 2026
TOPIC: Report of Settlements of Claims Awarded by the City Manager, City Attorney, and Executive Director of Human Resources

AGENDA TITLE
Report of Settlements up to $50,000 for General Liability Claims and up to $150,000 for Worker’s Compensation Claims Authorized by the City Manager, City Attorney, and Human Resources Director as Permitted by City Council Resolution 2018-045

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Receive and file Report of Settlements entered into between July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2025.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
City Council Resolution 2018-045 requires the Executive Director of Human Resources to submit a Quarterly Report (Report) to the City Council disclosing all settlements approved and executed under the authority of the City Manager, City Attorney, and Executive Director of Human Resources for informational purposes. The Report is required to include the names of the claimant and the amounts of each settlement along with a brief description.

City Council Resolution 2018-045 authorizes the Executive Director of Human Resources, City Attorney, and City Manager to allow, compromise, or settle liability claims and/or pending litigation against the City for up to fifty thousand dollars ($50,000). It also provides the Executive Director of Human Resources authority to compromise or settle workers’ compensation claims up to one hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) with the approval of the City Attorney and City Manager While the Resolution was approved in 2018, this quarterly report has not been brought before Council previously. Therefore, the past five years of settlements are included in this Report in addition to the first two quarters of Fiscal Year 25-26.

The exhibits contain listings of all settlements entered into during the period July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2025, valued at amounts up to $50,000 for liability claims (Exhibit 1),

City Council
8 –
1 2/17/2026

Report of Settlements
February 17, 2026

5 5
6 5
and up to $150,000 for Worker’s Compensation settlements (Exhibit 2). The names of employees receiving Worker’s Compensation settlements have been removed from the list for confidentiality reasons.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Report of General Liability Settlements – July 1, 2020 to December 31, 2025

2. Report of Worker’s Compensation Settlements – July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2025
Submitted By: Lori Schnaider, Executive Director of Human Resources Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager

City Council
8 –
2 2/17/2026

EXHIBIT 1
No. Date CLAIMANT Claim Number Department Payment Description AMOUNT 1 7/6/2021 Apodaca, Noah 21-156075 Parks & Recreation Property Damage $515.63 2 7/27/2021 Torres de Marquez, Maria 18-138687 Public Works Bodily Injury $25,000.00 3 7/27/2021 Small, Thomas Christophe 19-144768 Police Bodily Injury $30,000.00 4 8/3/2021 Arredondo, Enrique 20-151942 Public Works Property Damage $6,116.00 5 8/18/2021 Garcia Sandoval, Esther 21-155086 Public Works Property Damage $5,000.00 6 10/12/2021 Porras, Jose Gerardo 20-146894 Police Bodily Injury $8,750.00 7 10/21/2021 Prado, Lucia Saenz 21-155997 Public Works Property Damage $1,000.00 8 10/26/2021 Romero, Leticia 19-140980 Public Works Bodily Injury $30,000.00 9 10/26/2021 Mojica, Manuel 21-156875 Police Property Damage $1,943.16 10 11/2/2021 Jones, Dawn Marie 21-157317 Public Works Bodily Injury $250.00 11 11/16/2021 Llenifer Avalos Hernandez 20-148759 Public Works Bodily Injury $10,125.00 12 11/16/2021 Ventura, Hector Martin 20-151238 Public Works Property Damage $477.35 13 12/7/2021 Keuilian, Kimber 21-156708 Public Works Property Damage $651.27 14 12/7/2021 Gabriel, Jason Andrew 21-159312 Planning & Building Property Damage $4,521.05 15 12/16/2021 Schnaider, Lori Elizabeth 21-159352 Planning & Building Property Damage $3,065.79 16 12/22/2021 Chang, Kyung J 21-157295 Public Works Property Damage $1,209.71 17 12/30/2021 Cortez, Maria Calderon 20-148440 Police Property Damage $250.00 18 1/27/2022 Billante, Savanna 20-147270 Parks & Recreation Bodily Injury $30,000.00 19 3/29/2022 Bautista, Maria 164-2018-066 Public Works Bodily Injury $10,000.00 20 4/5/2022 United Financial Casualty ASO Wi 22-161932 Police Property Damage $1,690.74 21 4/14/2022 Flores, Hob Carlos 22-160431 Police Property Damage $53.51 22 4/28/2022 Cortez, Liliana 20-150837 Public Works Property Damage $6,000.00 23 5/3/2022 Gabriel, Jason Andrew 21-159312 Planning & Building Property Damage $3,532.92 24 5/5/2022 Martinez, Rosa 21-155920 Public Works Property Damage $1,974.82 25 5/10/2022 Cazarin, Kevin Andrew 19-142846 Police Bodily Injury $20,000.00 26 5/10/2022 Rados, Kathy K. 20-146078 Public Works Bodily Injury $35,000.00 27 5/19/2022 Jimenez, Angelica 22-162591 Police Property Damage $4,025.00 28 6/13/2022 Charter Spectrum 22-162716 Public Works Property Damage $2,306.74 29 6/20/2022 Padilla, Marcella 22-162570 Public Works Bodily Injury $1,500.00 30 6/30/2022 Brandt, Leland Paul 21-153549 Public Works Bodily Injury $22,000.00 31 8/1/2022 Stanley, Alison 22-163891 Public Works Property Damage $1,331.00 32 8/23/2022 Sunahara, Stephanie 19-144012 Public Works Bodily Injury $21,151.67 Quarterly Report of General Liability Settlements: July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2025

City Council
8 –
3 2/17/2026

33 9/6/2022 Aburto, Rafael 21-155641 Public Works Property Damage $5,208.00 34 9/19/2022 Carmona, Maria Elena 22-163018 Public Works Property Damage $644.00 35 10/3/2022 Wawanesa Ins. aso Diane Chavez 22-162822 Public Works Property Damage $2,024.73 36 10/25/2022 Granillo, Jose Antonio 20-151237 Public Works Bodily Injury $8,650.00 37 10/25/2022 Arteaga Albavera, Alicia 22-166153 Police Property Damage $1,914.54 38 10/26/2022 County of Orange 20-151237 Public Works Bodily Injury $4,850.00 39 11/8/2022 Bernal, Tammy Ann 22-164766 Public Works Property Damage $4,000.00 40 11/14/2022 Martinez, Alberto Aguilar 20-151212 Police Bodily Injury $19,500.00 41 12/7/2022 Alliance United Ins ASO Erika G. C 22-163702 Police Property Damage $7,749.75 42 12/14/2022 Flores, Silvia Lopez 21-155216 Public Works Property Damage $2,500.00 43 1/10/2023 Mid-Century Ins ASO De La Torre 22-162327 Public Works Property Damage $9,598.12 44 1/16/2023 Frankston, Emerson 23-168894 Parks & Recreation Property Damage $4,839.95 45 1/30/2023 Haywood, John 22-163298 Public Works Property Damage $1,965.00 46 1/30/2023 Farmer's Insurance aso, Hudekoff, 23-169051 Public Works Property Damage $1,459.57 47 2/1/2023 Lebres-Rosales, Daniel 21-156134 Police Bodily Injury $40,000.00 48 2/6/2023 Arteaga Albavera, Alicia 22-166153 Police Bodily Injury $10,000.00 49 2/6/2023 Frankston, Emerson 23-168894 Parks & Recreation Property Damage $466.98 50 2/6/2023 Frankston, Emerson 23-168894 Parks & Recreation Property Damage $2,651.23 51 2/7/2023 Hernandez Naranjo, Miguel 21-159616 Public Works Bodily Injury $7,500.00 52 2/13/2023 Organista, Elinor 22-166315 Public Works Property Damage $361.38 53 2/14/2023 Lomeli, Gabriela 22-168574 Public Works Property Damage $653.64 54 3/6/2023 Martinez, Rubio Kelvi 23-168914 Public Works Property Damage $2,398.50 55 3/7/2023 Camarillo, Michael 22-167720 Public Works Bodily Injury $2,500.00 56 3/13/2023 Subro Claims, Inc. OBO AAA Ins A 22-164635 Police Property Damage $1,795.72 57 3/15/2023 Solis, Eusebio 21-155060 Public Works Bodily Injury $9,800.00 58 3/20/2023 Sanchez, Lidia M. 22-167706 Public Works Property Damage $3,588.87 59 3/22/2023 Morales, Lucio 23-169071 Public Works Property Damage $4,302.39 60 3/27/2023 Tell, George Arthur 23-168906 Public Works Property Damage $337.80 61 3/27/2023 Johnson, Clifford Charles 23-169220 Public Works Property Damage $698.97 62 3/28/2023 Moore, Joyce Nunez 22-166418 Public Works Property Damage $394.99 63 3/30/2023 Martin, Johnny 19-144233 Public Works Bodily Injury $12,000.00 64 4/10/2023 Olivas, Ben 22-164768 Public Works Property Damage $6,000.00 65 4/10/2023 Lee, Donnette Ronee 23-170699 Public Works Property Damage $872.22 66 4/17/2023 Frausto, Janet 23-170265 Public Works Property Damage $443.34 67 4/24/2023 Roa, Byanca Nicole 23-169116 Public Works Property Damage $111.74 68 5/22/2023 Felix, Maria A 23-170462 Public Works Property Damage $271.26

City Council
8 –
4 2/17/2026

69 5/29/2023 Beltran, Melizza 23-169533 Public Works Property Damage $3,773.40 70 5/29/2023 Paar, Jason 23-169744 Police Property Damage $1,000.00 71 5/31/2023 Olsen, Todd Christopher 23-171046 Public Works Property Damage $467.97 72 6/6/2023 Ordonez, Maria B. 21-159053 Public Works Bodily Injury $2,500.00 73 6/8/2023 Quesada, Anthony 20-150685 Police Bodily Injury $22,500.00 74 6/8/2023 Quesada, Michael 20-150685 Police Bodily Injury $22,500.00 75 6/12/2023 Orozco, Martin 23-170902 Public Works Property Damage $530.44 76 6/13/2023 Westerly Park HOA 23-172146 Public Works Property Damage $1,200.00 77 7/3/2023 Alcala, Izack Anthony 23-170898 Public Works Property Damage $772.35 78 7/6/2023 Kerylow, Deanna 21-155085 Public Works Bodily Injury $45,000.00 79 7/10/2023 Lowery, Alexis Jane 20-147137 Public Works Bodily Injury $35,000.00 80 7/10/2023 Franco, Jose 21-158735 Public Works Bodily Injury $21,500.00 81 7/31/2023 Trejo Gonzalez, Maria Brenda 23-169348 Public Works Property Damage $1,782.00 82 8/14/2023 Vargas, Kenny 23-170884 Public Works Property Damage $210.10 83 8/22/2023 Bolstad, Eric 23-170576 Public Works Property Damage $2,310.00 84 8/30/2023 Wild Orchid Investments LLC & Lie 23-169865 Public Works Property Damage $3,983.94 85 8/30/2023 Kent, Brenda Le Ann 23-171043 Public Works Property Damage $1,279.75 86 9/13/2023 Yurcho, Andrew J 23-173734 Public Works Property Damage $179.70 87 9/20/2023 Johnson, Kristi Michelle 20-151080 Public Works Bodily Injury $30,000.00 88 10/11/2023 Jolivett, Alanna Marie 23-172480 Public Works Property Damage $230.00 89 10/23/2023 Geico Ins ASO Janine J. Macwan 22-163952 Police Property Damage $1,038.24 90 10/25/2023 Caballero Sr., Ernesto 22-167431 Public Works Property Damage $8,517.44 91 11/13/2023 Wawanesa Ins aso Keith Younglov22-167708 Police Property Damage $2,402.28 92 11/14/2023 Pacheco Felix, Basilio 23-171665 Public Works Property Damage $1,134.61 93 11/15/2023 Golden, Josh 23-172005 Public Works Property Damage $465.37 94 12/5/2023 Perez, Erick Adrian 23-173822 Public Works Property Damage $2,366.37 95 12/5/2023 Pagasa, Marcelo Palacios 23-174596 Public Works Property Damage $1,000.00 96 1/22/2024 Gonzalez Ramirez, Ma Luisa 21-153726 Public Works Bodily Injury $40,000.00 97 1/24/2024 Halfman, Alexandra Mae 23-169209 Public Works Property Damage $562.49 98 1/29/2024 Gutierrez, Javier R. 23-172007 Public Works Property Damage $150.00 99 2/12/2024 Lopez, Esthela 21-159484 Public Works Bodily Injury $10,000.00 100 3/6/2024 Mercury Ins. aso Jacqueline Monte24-177044 Police Property Damage $2,004.91 101 3/7/2024 Wawanesa Ins ASO Sunly Tea 23-172771 Public Works Property Damage $18,046.00 102 3/26/2024 Olvera, Jose Luis 24-176984 Public Works Property Damage $1,200.00 103 4/8/2024 Elias, Victoriano 23-170580 Public Works Property Damage $9,876.76 104 4/9/2024 Avila, Salvador John 23-172203 Police Property Damage $7,480.23

City Council
8 –
5 2/17/2026

105 4/10/2024 Tea, Sunly 23-172771 Public Works Bodily Injury $10,000.00 106 4/16/2024 Ramirez, Maria 20-146572 Public Works Bodily Injury $50,000.00 107 4/22/2024 Martinez, Julian H. 21-159957 Public Works Bodily Injury $10,000.00 108 4/23/2024 Bartley, Marvel Elaine 24-177900 Public Works Property Damage $440.43 109 4/29/2024 Tran, Long Dinh 23-173876 Public Works Property Damage $457.94 110 4/29/2024 Salcast, Guadalupe 24-177646 Public Works Property Damage $124.20 111 5/7/2024 Perales, Amy Celeste 24-177368 Public Works Property Damage $199.99 112 5/20/2024 Mercury Ins aso Cesar Castorena 24-178817 Police Property Damage $4,884.51 113 5/28/2024 Gonzalez, Valentin 23-174060 Police Property Damage $10,594.42 114 5/29/2024 Gelazela, Mark Alan 20-149193 Police Bodily Injury $40,000.00 115 6/5/2024 Albritton, Nicholas Travis 24-179097 Public Works Property Damage $544.64 116 6/18/2024 Gill II, James Eyre 24-176894 Police Property Damage $1,200.00 117 6/20/2024 Gaglio, Thomas Joseph 24-178234 Public Works Property Damage $206.59 118 6/24/2024 Chinn, Mary Elizabeth 24-178764 Police Bodily Injury $2,500.00 119 7/1/2024 Godoy, Inosencio Et Al 164-82-026 Finance Bodily Injury $358.00 120 7/1/2024 Tocher, Jr., Patrick P. 164-95-045 Police Bodily Injury $250.00 121 7/10/2024 Republic Waste Services Southern 24-180192 Public Works Property Damage $1,177.75 122 7/23/2024 Ochoa, Carmen 20-150669 Public Works Bodily Injury $38,750.00 123 7/24/2024 Serrano Atonal, Arturo 22-162758 Police Bodily Injury $37,000.00 124 7/29/2024 Hsiung, Christopher 24-180083 Public Works Property Damage $286.88 125 7/30/2024 Herrera, Gloria 21-159693 Public Works Bodily Injury $25,000.00 126 8/6/2024 Tran, Long Dinh 23-173876 Public Works Property Damage -$457.94 127 8/12/2024 Reyes, Rogelio 164-2018-032 Police Bodily Injury $10,000.00 128 8/12/2024 Zaragoza, Yolanda 22-163860 Public Works Bodily Injury $50,000.00 129 8/12/2024 Tran, Long Dinh 23-173876 Public Works Property Damage $457.94 130 8/19/2024 Sanchez, Steven 23-173527 Police Bodily Injury $38,000.00 131 9/11/2024 Fleet Response obo United Rental 24-180206 Public Works Property Damage $2,971.02 132 9/19/2024 State Farm Ins aso Kha Van Tran 24-179938 Police Property Damage $6,347.06 133 9/25/2024 Bernaudo-Delgado, Marilyn 23-171555 Public Works Property Damage $300.00 134 9/26/2024 Rahemtulla, Mumtaz 23-175740 Public Works Bodily Injury $5,000.00 135 10/3/2024 Gongora, Rita 22-168582 Parks & Recreation Bodily Injury $50,000.00 136 10/15/2024 Phan, Tin 23-171973 Police Property Damage $1,100.00 137 10/29/2024 Lloyd, David George 24-180464 Public Works Property Damage $750.00 138 10/30/2024 Lacy, James V. obo United States 24-181489 Clerk of Council Bodily Injury $35,041.15 139 12/4/2024 Garrison Property and Casual Ins A 23-172233 Police Property Damage $13,922.70 140 12/4/2024 Gomez, Rosalio 24-183223 Human Resources Bodily Injury $7,500.00

City Council
8 –
6 2/17/2026

141 12/16/2024 California Casualty aso Dennis Per23-169467 Public Works Property Damage $15,664.86 142 12/24/2024 United Parcel Service 24-181769 Police Property Damage $2,889.28 143 1/13/2025 AAA Insurance a/s/o Cheolmin Pak24-182512 Public Works Property Damage $8,686.52 144 1/20/2025 Yentes, John 23-174165 Public Works Bodily Injury $47,500.00 145 2/3/2025 Romero Pinones, Luis 22-162069 Public Works Bodily Injury $2,000.00 146 2/4/2025 Middlesex Ins Co aso Lighting Tec 24-180662 Public Works Property Damage $5,928.12 147 2/25/2025 Garcia, Esther 24-179512 Public Works Property Damage $3,000.00 148 3/3/2025 De Haro, Angelina 164-84-152 Parks & Recreation Bodily Injury $413.00 149 3/3/2025 Fife, Donald 164-87-062 Public Works Bodily Injury $5,000.00 150 3/3/2025 De La Cruz, Emilio 164-87-236 Police Bodily Injury $340.00 151 3/3/2025 Ramos, Enriquetta 164-89-053 Fire Bodily Injury $1,087.26 152 3/3/2025 Andes, Elizabeth 164-89-230 Public Works Bodily Injury $1,418.16 153 3/3/2025 Doan, Lan Ngoc 164-90-197 Public Works Bodily Injury $3,000.00 154 3/3/2025 Hungerschafer, Robert 164-91-199 Police Bodily Injury $889.00 155 3/3/2025 Haliburda, Tom 164-92-030 Police Bodily Injury $500.00 156 3/3/2025 Haro, John 164-93-162 Police Bodily Injury $2,260.31 157 3/7/2025 Medina, Matthew Daniel 164-2006-014 Public Works Bodily Injury / Property Dam $300.00 158 3/7/2025 Guillory, Preston 164-US-65 Police Bodily Injury / Property Dam $10,000.00 159 3/24/2025 Paar, Jason 23-169744 Police Property Damage $483.72 160 4/7/2025 Phillips, Carmen 22-162599 Public Works Bodily Injury $7,000.00 161 4/9/2025 Rodriguez, Javier Francisco 24-178407 Planning & Building Property Damage $1,493.21 162 4/15/2025 Allstate Ins Co ASO Sebastion Cha24-182709 Public Works Property Damage $836.35 163 4/16/2025 AAA aso, Federico Santoro, 25-184925 Public Works Property Damage $1,775.52 164 4/23/2025 Santa Ana Police Officers Assoc. ( 21-155464 Police Bodily Injury $50,000.00 165 6/4/2025 Gutierrez, Alejandro 25-184130 Public Works Property Damage $3,233.37 166 6/9/2025 Byun, Jonathan 24-177133 Public Works Property Damage $993.20 167 6/9/2025 Chu, Lily 24-181275 Public Works Property Damage $6,471.79 168 6/16/2025 Flores, Yobanna Yssel 23-171076 Public Works Property Damage $265.00 169 6/24/2025 Vargas, Alejandra 25-186962 Property Damage $900.00 170 6/30/2025 Espiritu, Donny 25-185485 Police Property Damage $1,322.66 171 6/30/2025 Mutual Insurance, Liberty 25-186034 Police Property Damage $3,477.52 172 7/15/2025 Perez, Mary Alice 20-148889 Public Works Bodily Injury $20,000.00 173 7/15/2025 Moran, Miguel Angel 22-166906 Public Works Bodily Injury $12,000.00 174 8/4/2025 A1 Events & Party Rentals, 25-184549 Public Works Property Damage $2,500.00 175 8/18/2025 Kemper a/s/o Rosa Aguilar Perez 25-185042 Public Works Property Damage $5,496.30 176 8/27/2025 Guerrero, Yolanda 24-182749 Public Works Property Damage $6,482.53

City Council
8 –
7 2/17/2026

177 9/8/2025 ATM Global, Inc. 25-187431 Police Property Damage $4,900.00 178 9/22/2025 Mayen Garcia, Magdaleno 25-188144 Public Works Property Damage $2,178.77 179 9/22/2025 Douek, Maurice 25-188372 Public Works Property Damage $3,900.00 180 10/6/2025 Ramirez, Aurora 25-187813 Public Works Property Damage $975.00 181 10/13/2025 State Farm, a/s/o Mizraim Rodrigu 25-187530 Police Property Damage $3,885.78 182 12/17/2025 Montealegre, Maria 25-189604 Police Property Damage $527.00 183 12/22/2025 Phoenix Loss Control aso, Charter 25-189667 Public Works Property Damage $3,187.28 184 9/8/2025 ATM Global, Inc. 25-187431 Police Property Damage $4,900.00 185 9/22/2025 Mayen Garcia, Magdaleno 25-188144 Public Works Property Damage $2,178.77 186 9/22/2025 Douek, Maurice 25-188372 Public Works Property Damage $3,900.00 187 10/6/2025 Ramirez, Aurora 25-187813 Public Works Property Damage $975.00 188 10/13/2025 State Farm, a/s/o Mizraim Rodrigu 25-187530 Police Property Damage $3,885.78 189 12/17/2025 Montealegre, Maria 25-189604 Police Property Damage $527.00 190 12/22/2025 Phoenix Loss Control aso, Charter 25-189667 Public Works Property Damage $3,187.28

City Council
8 –
8 2/17/2026

EXHIBIT 2
No. Settle - Date Settlement Type Claim Number Agency Claim Type Settlement Amount 1 7/8/2021 Stipulated Award 163-16-0114 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 118,102.50 2 7/13/2021 Stipulated Award 163-18-0054 Police Department Future Medical 13,412.50 3 7/23/2021 Stipulated Award 19-143529 Public Works Future Medical 870 4 8/11/2021 Stipulated Award 163-18-0015 Police Department Future Medical 30,957.50 5 8/12/2021 Compromise Settlement 163-15-0124 Police Department Future Medical 7,170.00 6 8/19/2021 Stipulated Award 163-16-0081 Police Department Future Medical 42,050.00 7 8/23/2021 Stipulated Award 163-16-0078 Police Department Future Medical 44,080.00 8 9/29/2021 Stipulated Award 19-144907 Police Department Future Medical 11,092.50 9 10/7/2021 Stipulated Award 19-141236 Police Department Future Medical 1,740.00 10 10/14/2021 Stipulated Award 20-147321 Police Department Future Medical 9,932.50 11 10/18/2021 Stipulated Award 19-140069 Community DevelopFuture Medical 21,895.00 12 10/27/2021 Stipulated Award 163-14-0165 Human Resources Future Medical 70,470.00 13 11/2/2021 Stipulated Award 20-148324 Police Department Future Medical 8,772.50 14 11/17/2021 Stipulated Award 163-16-0129 Police Department Future Medical 14,645.00 15 11/30/2021 Stipulated Award 163-17-0173 Public Works Future Medical 20,445.00 16 12/13/2021 Stipulated Award 20-146723 Police Department Future Medical 6,960.00 17 12/15/2021 Stipulated Award 19-144438 Police Department Future Medical 2,610.00 18 12/16/2021 Stipulated Award 20-147397 Police Department Future Medical 1,740.00 19 12/21/2021 Stipulated Award 163-18-0079 Police Department Future Medical 9,932.50 20 12/23/2021 Stipulated Award 163-15-0177 Police Department Future Medical 68,440.00 21 12/27/2021 Compromise Settlement 20-147713 Police Department Indemnity 15,000.00 22 12/31/2021 Stipulated Award 163-17-0106 Police Department Future Medical 97,222.50 23 1/18/2022 Findings and Award 163-18-0011 Police Department Future Medical 8,772.50 24 1/19/2022 Compromise Settlement 20-147537 Police Department Indemnity 75,000.00 25 1/24/2022 Stipulated Award 19-145340 Police Department Future Medical 1,740.00 26 1/27/2022 Stipulated Award 19-142852 Police Department Indemnity 34,427.50 27 2/10/2022 Stipulated Award 20-149333 Police Department Future Medical 6,090.00 28 2/15/2022 Stipulated Award 20-151880 Police Department Future Medical 5,220.00 29 3/4/2022 Stipulated Award 20-149681 Police Department Future Medical 7,830.00 30 3/9/2022 Stipulated Award 163-10-0163 Police Department Future Medical 7,877.50 31 3/9/2022 Stipulated Award 163-18-0091 Police Department Future Medical 26,245.00 32 4/5/2022 Stipulated Award 163-15-0099 Public Works Future Medical 44,080.00 Quarterly Report of Settlements: July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2025

City Council
8 –
9 2/17/2026

33 4/8/2022 Stipulated Award 20-148862 Police Department Future Medical 13,412.50 34 4/8/2022 Stipulated Award 21-153575 Police Department Indemnity 42,050.00 35 4/22/2022 Stipulated Award 163-18-0104 Police Department Future Medical 1,740.00 36 4/26/2022 Stipulated Award 20-151752 Planning & Building Future Medical 14,465.00 37 4/27/2022 Stipulated Award 20-151248 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 26,245.00 38 5/6/2022 Compromise Settlement 19-143296 Planning & Building Future Medical 30,957.50 39 5/12/2022 Stipulated Award 20-148034 Police Department Future Medical 1,740.00 40 5/24/2022 Stipulated Award 20-150041 Public Works Indemnity/Future Medical 23,345.00 41 6/1/2022 Stipulated Award 21-155689 Police Department Future Medical 18,995.00 42 6/14/2022 Stipulated Award 163-16-0099 Police Department Future Medical 23,345.00 43 6/15/2022 Compromise Settlement 21-157711 Police Department Indemnity 125,000.00 44 6/17/2022 Compromise Settlement 19-143235 Parks & Recreation Indemnity 42,050.00 45 6/17/2022 Compromise Settlement 163-17-0220 Parks & Recreation Indemnity 42,050.00 46 6/20/2022 Stipulated Award 21-156042 Police Department Future Medical 16,095.00 47 6/30/2022 Stipulated Award 20-146985 Police Department Future Medical 5,220.00 48 7/1/2022 Stipulated Award 20-146257 Police Department Future Medical 8,772.50 49 8/25/2022 Stipulated Award 20-150759 Police Department Future Medical 8,772.50 50 9/15/2022 Stipulated Award 20-150549 Police Department Future Medical 37,990.00 51 9/22/2022 Stipulated Award 20-147108 Police Department Future Medical 20,445.00 52 10/13/2022 Stipulated Award 21-153855 Public Works Indemnity/Future Medical 37,990.00 53 11/2/2022 Stipulated Award 21-158936 Public Works Future Medical 3,480.00 54 11/2/2022 Stipulated Award 20-148101 Public Works Future Medical 27,695.00 55 11/14/2022 Stipulated Award 163-09-5030 Police Department Future Medical 16,645.00 56 11/14/2022 Stipulated Award 21-154988 Police Department Future Medical 34,435.50 57 11/14/2022 Stipulated Award 163-18-0139 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 92,582.50 58 11/18/2022 Stipulated Award 21-156677 Public Works Future Medical 5,220.00 59 11/21/2022 Stipulated Award 22-161725 Police Department Future Medical 8,772.50 60 11/22/2022 Stipulated Award 163-15-0123 Police Department Future Medical 4,350.00 61 11/22/2022 Stipulated Award 19-142930 Police Department Future Medical 90,262.50 62 11/29/2022 Stipulated Award 21-156234 Police Department Future Medical 12,252.50 63 12/21/2022 Stipulated Award 21-157939 Public Works Future Medical 11,092.50 64 12/21/2022 Stipulated Award 19-145417 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 111,142.50 65 1/9/2023 Findings and Award 21-156636 Police Department Indemnity 108,302.50 66 1/11/2023 Stipulated Award 20-149879 Police Department Future Medical 30,957.50 67 1/24/2023 Stipulated Award 19-140510 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 115,782.50 68 2/14/2023 Stipulated Award 22-162949 Police Department Future Medical 8,772.50

City Council
8 –
10 2/17/2026

69 2/16/2023 Stipulated Award 22-163659 Police Department Future Medical 4,350.00 70 3/6/2023 Stipulated Award 20-150758 Police Department Future Medical 12,252.50 71 3/6/2023 Stipulated Award 19-143628 Public Works Indemnity/Future Medical 90,262.50 72 3/9/2023 Stipulated Award 20-148010 Police Department Future Medical 1,740.00 73 3/17/2023 Stipulated Award 163-17-0141 Police Department Future Medical 32,679.50 74 3/17/2023 Stipulated Award 163-17-0158 Police Department Future Medical 90,262.50 75 3/23/2023 Stipulated Award 163-18-0126 Public Works Future Medical 43,480.00 76 4/12/2023 Stipulated Award 163-18-0063 Police Department Future Medical 14,645.00 77 4/18/2023 Compromise Settlement 21-159396 Parks & Recreation Indemnity 1,500.00 78 4/18/2023 Stipulated Award 163-16-0185 Police Department Future Medical 7,830.00 79 4/24/2023 Stipulated Award 21-152825 Police Department Future Medical 3,480.00 80 4/24/2023 Stipulated Award 21-152852 Police Department Future Medical 11,092.50 81 4/24/2023 Stipulated Award 163-06-3659 Police Department Future Medical 17,710.00 82 5/5/2023 Stipulated Award 22-165284 Police Department Future Medical 1,740.00 83 5/5/2023 Stipulated Award 19-140067 Police Department Future Medical 14,645.00 84 5/16/2023 Stipulated Award 163-15-0087 Public Works Future Medical 42,050.00 85 5/30/2023 Stipulated Award 21-157588 Finance Indemnity/Future Medical 26,245.50 86 5/30/2023 Stipulated Award 22-163784 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 50,170.00 87 5/30/2023 Findings and Award 20-147334 Finance Indemnity/Future Medical 92,582.50 88 6/7/2023 Stipulated Award 20-151879 Police Department Indemnity 14,645.00 89 6/19/2023 Stipulated Award 21-157611 Police Department Future Medical 14,645.00 90 6/28/2023 Stipulated Award 21-155065 Police Department Future Medical 6,090.00 91 6/29/2023 Stipulated Award 21-154604 Police Department Future Medical 8,772.50 92 7/10/2023 Stipulated Award 20-147823 Police Department Future Medical 54,230.00 93 7/11/2023 Stipulated Award 22-162950 Police Department Future Medical 50,170.00 94 7/12/2023 Stipulated Award 22-166311 Public Works Indemnity/Future Medical 20,445.00 95 7/14/2023 Stipulated Award 22-166727 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 54,230.00 96 7/21/2023 Stipulated Award 21-157906 Police Department Future Medical 8,772.50 97 7/28/2023 Stipulated Award 22-163993 Police Department Future Medical 5,220.00 98 8/11/2023 Stipulated Award 21-158174 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 44,080.00 99 8/23/2023 Stipulated Award 163-16-0063 Police Department Future Medical 1,740.00 100 8/28/2023 Stipulated Award 22-163253 Police Department Future Medical 8,772.50 101 8/30/2023 Stipulated Award 163-17-0219 Police Department Future Medical 36,177.50 102 9/1/2023 Stipulated Award 18-137999 Police Department Future Medical 54,230.00 103 9/7/2023 Stipulated Award 19-145829 Police Department Future Medical 9,932.50 104 9/18/2023 Stipulated Award 19-145172 Police Department Future Medical 4,350.00

City Council
8 –
11 2/17/2026

105 9/18/2023 Stipulated Award 163-16-0145 Police Department Future Medical 40,020.00 106 9/18/2023 Stipulated Award 20-151889 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 144,202.50 107 9/25/2023 Stipulated Award 21-158416 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 130,282.50 108 9/29/2023 Stipulated Award 22-161722 Police Department Future Medical 9,932.50 109 10/3/2023 Stipulated Award 21-155066 Police Department Future Medical 6,960.00 110 10/9/2023 Stipulated Award 22-166975 Police Department Future Medical 5,220.00 111 10/17/2023 Stipulated Award 22-162348 Police Department Future Medical 24,795.00 112 10/23/2023 Stipulated Award 163-18-0125 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 50,170.00 113 11/6/2023 Stipulated Award 22-161097 Public Works Future Medical 34,437.50 114 11/30/2023 Stipulated Award 20-146233 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 99,542.50 115 12/14/2023 Stipulated Award 23-168785 Police Department Future Medical 1,740.00 116 12/21/2023 Stipulated Award 22-163306 Police Department Future Medical 3,480.00 117 12/21/2023 Stipulated Award 21-156503 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 74,530.00 118 1/30/2024 Stipulated Award 19-140277 Police Department Future Medical 6,960.00 119 3/12/2024 Stipulated Award 23-171806 Police Department Future Medical 6,090.00 120 3/14/2024 Stipulated Award 22-164444 Police Department Future Medical 8,772.50 121 3/18/2024 Stipulated Award 21-159219 Police Department Future Medical 18,995.00 122 3/26/2024 Stipulated Award 22-166902 Police Department Future Medical 1,740.00 123 4/26/2024 Stipulated Award 23-170356 Library Future Medical 1,740.00 124 4/26/2024 Compromise Settlement 21-156866 City Attorney's OfficeIndemnity 67,050.00 125 5/8/2024 Stipulated Award 163-13-0170 Police Department Future Medical 6,957.50 126 5/8/2024 Stipulated Award 163-18-0110 Police Department Future Medical 24,795.00 127 5/8/2024 Stipulated Award 21-158217 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 52,200.00 128 5/21/2024 Compromise Settlement 163-16-0173 Police Department Future Medical 20,000.00 129 5/24/2024 Stipulated Award 22-167413 Police Department Future Medical 8,772.50 130 5/28/2024 Stipulated Award 23-172373 Police Department Future Medical 1,740.00 131 5/29/2024 Stipulated Award 22-162894 Public Works Future Medical 5,220.00 132 6/12/2024 Stipulated Award 22-167298 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 23,345.00 133 6/14/2024 Stipulated Award 22-164446 Police Department Future Medical 11,092.50 134 7/18/2024 Compromise Settlement 163-07-4191 Fire Department Indemnity 40,000.00 135 8/7/2024 Stipulated Award 23-171012 Police Department Future Medical 12,252.50 136 9/20/2024 Stipulated Award 23-171673 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 34,437.50 137 9/24/2024 Stipulated Award 22-166464 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 78,662.50 138 9/25/2024 Compromise Settlement 21-155783 Community DevelopIndemnity 150,000.00 139 9/25/2024 Compromise Settlement 24-181868 Community DevelopIndemnity 150,000.00 140 10/8/2024 Stipulated Award 21-160007 Police Department Future Medical 44,080.00

City Council
8 –
12 2/17/2026

141 10/16/2024 Stipulated Award 20-152380 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 115,782.50 142 10/18/2024 Stipulated Award 23-174970 Police Department Future Medical 23,345.00 143 10/26/2024 Stipulated Award 23-173991 Police Department Future Medical 7,830.00 144 12/5/2024 Compromise Settlement 23-172335 Police Department Indemnity 50,000.00 145 12/16/2024 Stipulated Award 23-174562 Police Department Future Medical 4,350.00 146 1/29/2025 Stipulated Award 23-174752 Police Department Future Medical 1,740.00 147 2/10/2025 Stipulated Award 20-148899 Police Department Future Medical 4,350.00 148 2/19/2025 Stipulated Award 23-174022 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 29,217.50 149 2/21/2025 Stipulated Award 23-173517 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 36,177.50 150 3/11/2025 Compromise Settlement 163-18-0051 Police Department Indemnity 100,000.00 151 3/11/2025 Compromise Settlement 22-166104 Police Department Indemnity 100,000.00 152 3/12/2025 Stipulated Award 23-172919 Public Works Future Medical 2,610.00 153 4/2/2025 Stipulated Award 23-173713 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 56,260.00 154 4/3/2025 Stipulated Award 20-150829 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 68,440.00 155 4/3/2025 Stipulated Award 163-17-0131 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 104,182.50 156 4/24/2025 Stipulated Award 24-179117 Human Resources Future Medical 6,090.00 157 4/24/2025 Stipulated Award 24-179428 Police Department Future Medical 8,772.50 158 5/8/2025 Compromise Settlement 22-167903 Police Department Indemnity 9,932.50 159 5/8/2025 Compromise Settlement 21-153199 Police Department Indemnity 75,000.00 160 5/15/2025 Stipulated Award 20-150360 Police Department Future Medical 8,772.50 161 5/15/2025 Stipulated Award 163-16-0092 Police Department Future Medical 17,545.00 162 6/10/2025 Stipulated Award 22-168111 Police Department Future Medical 12,252.50 163 6/10/2025 Stipulated Award 23-171744 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 37,990.00 164 6/13/2025 Stipulated Award 24-180259 Police Department Future Medical 1,740.00 165 6/20/2025 Stipulated Award 24-177783 Police Department Future Medical 12,252.50 166 6/23/2025 Stipulated Award 25-183792 Police Department Future Medical 6,090.00 167 7/17/2025 Stipulated Award 20-148035 Police Department Future Medical 1,740.00 168 7/17/2025 Stipulated Award 21-158176 Police Department Future Medical 6,960.00 169 7/17/2025 Stipulated Award 23-173888 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 40,020.00 170 7/21/2025 Stipulated Award 23-170429 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 48,140.00 171 8/27/2025 Compromise Settlement 23-171300 Police Department Indemnity 20,000.00 172 8/27/2025 Stipulated Award 24-176515 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 26,245.00 173 8/27/2025 Stipulated Award 21-156781 Police Department Future Medical 29,217.50 174 9/4/2025 Compromise Settlement 25-183866 Parks & Recreation Indemnity 15,000.00 175 10/16/2025 Stipulated Award 24-177708 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 9,932.50 176 10/23/2025 Compromise Settlement 20-149682 Community DevelopIndemnity 20,000.00

City Council
8 –
13 2/17/2026

177 10/28/2025 Stipulated Award 24-179494 Police Department Indemnity/Future Medical 56,260.00 178 11/10/2025 Stipulated Award 22-160688 Police Department Future Medical 7,830.00 179 11/14/2025 Stipulated Award 23-174111 Police Department Future Medical 37,990.00 180 12/12/2025 Stipulated Award 24-180309 Police Department Future Medical 3,480.00 181 12/12/2025 Stipulated Award 23-172058 Police Department Future Medical 12,252.50 182 12/26/2025 Stipulated Award 25-184428 Police Department Future Medical 1,740.00

City Council
8 –
14 2/17/2026

City Attorney’s Office
www.santa-ana.org/departments/city-attorneys-office/
Item # 9
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
February 17, 2026
TOPIC: Agreement for Legal Services

AGENDA TITLE
Agreement for Legal Counsel Services with Horvitz & Levy LLP (General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute a legal services agreement with the law firm of Horvitz & Levy LLP for legal services for appellate and litigation legal services for the period of February 17, 2026 until February 16, 2028, with an option to extend for up to one year, in an amount not to exceed $275,000 (Agreement No. A-2026-XXX).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

DISCUSSION
Horvitz & Levy LLP was founded in 1957. For 60 years, the law firm has specialized in appellate law. The firm is excellence-driven to deliver success at the highest level. It has assisted clients in complex, high-stakes cases across California and the Ninth Circuit, with more than 1,500 appeals litigated and over 150 appearances before the California Supreme Court since 2000.

The City seeks to retain Horvitz & Levy LLP because of the excellent work attorney, Justin Sarno, has provided to the City. Mr. Sarno is a certified appellate specialist by the California State Bar’s Board of Legal Specialization. Roughly 1% of California attorneys hold this certification in appellate law. Before joining Horvitz & Levy and while working for a different law firm, Mr. Sarno assisted the City in various litigation matters, proving his superior skills in providing legal services to the residents of Santa Ana. In particular, he successfully defended the City of Santa Ana both at the trial court level and at the appellate level in a high profile case. That case resulted in a published opinion in favor of the City, Cynthia Huerta, et al. v. City of Santa Ana, 39 Cal.App. 5th 41, which concerned whether a particular crosswalk constituted a dangerous condition. The lawsuit arose from a tragic accident on Halloween night in 2014 when a speeding motorist struck and killed three teenagers.

City Council
9 –
1 2/17/2026

Agreement for Legal Services
February 17, 2026

5 5
8 2
Mr. Sarno has briefed cases before the United States Supreme Court and argued appeals before the California Supreme Court, Ninth Circuit, and all districts within the California Courts of Appeal. He has represented government entities across Southern California, including the cities of Pasadena, Santa Ana, Manhattan Beach, Arcadia, Anaheim, Simi Valley, Culver City, Upland, and the County of Los Angeles. He has litigated cases in state and federal court on behalf of police departments, school districts, community colleges, chiefs of police, and public employees in cases related to constitutional civil rights, anti-SLAPP, wrongful death, labor and employment (Title VII, Title IX, and FEHA), class action, ADA compliance, administrative mandamus, government contracts and regulations, and premises liability.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City’s joint powers authority, Independent Cities Risk Management Authority (ICRMA), will apply the hourly rate of $350 towards fulfillment of the City’s self-insured retention. Funds are available in the Liability and Property Insurance Fund, Losses Paid (08009051-64050) to cover costs subject to litigation against the City, as approved by Adminsure for coverage under this fund. Funding is available in the current FY 25- 26 budget and funding for subsequent fiscal year will be included in the proposed budgets for City Council Consideration.

Fiscal Year Accounting Unit-
Account #
Account
Description
Amount
FY 2025-26 08009051-64050 Liability & Property
Ins. Fund, Losses
Paid
$125,000
FY 2026-27 08009051-64050 Liability & Property
Ins. Fund, Losses
Paid
$125,000
FY 2027-28 08009051-64050 Liability & Property
Ins. Fund, Losses
Paid
$25,000
Total: $275,000

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Legal Services Agreement with Horvitz & Levy LLP
Submitted By: Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager

City Council
9 –
2 2/17/2026

1 LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH

HORVITZ & LEVY LLP

This AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 17th day of February, 20 26 by and between Horvitz & Levy, LLP, a California limited liability partnership (“Attorneys”), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the constitution and laws of the State of California ("City”).

RECITALS

A. The City of Santa Ana and the City Attorney’s Office City desires to employ Attorneys to assist the in-house attorneys for the City (“City Attorney”) in the provision of legal services to the City, for appellate and litigation related matters by a firm with specialized expertise.

B. Attorneys represent that they are licensed to practice law in the State of California, have special experience and knowledge related to administrative and litigation matters concerning general liability, personnel and police matters, and desire to undertake said services.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:

1. RETENTION OF ATTORNEYS On an as-needed basis, and at the sole discretion of the City, City hereby agrees to and does retain Attorneys, for the compensation hereinafter specified, to assist the City Attorney with litigation filed against the City, for general advice and legal review on a case-by-case basis when urgent matters arise in relation to appellate and litigation related services to defend the City, its employees and its officials. Attorneys accept said retention and agree to perform, in a timely and efficient manner, all such services as may be requested by the City Attorney.

Attorneys shall confirm their acceptance of work requested by City in writing by e-mail or letter.

2. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES RENDERED

a. City agrees to compensate Attorneys, and Attorneys agree to accept from City, as and for payment in full for all services for the foregoing services, Partners will be billed at the rate of $850 an hour for all Partners and $625 an hour for all Associates. Time will be billed in 1/10th of an hour increments.

b. The total sum to be expended under this Agreement, shall not exceed $ 275,000 including any extension periods defined in Section 6, below. City shall compensate Attorneys for any services provided since January 28, 2026.

c. City agrees to reimburse Attorneys for out -of-pocket expenses, including but not limited to, mileage, copying costs, service of process, and mail services authorized by the City Attorney in connection with the performance of duties under this Agreement.

i. In-house printing, copying, and reproduction charges will be reimbursed at the rate of 20 cents per page.

City Council
9 –
3 2/17/2026

2 ii. The City will not reimburse Attorneys for Lexis, Westlaw or other paid legal research subscription services for ordinary legal research. However, the City will reimburse Attorneys for extraordinary legal research costs related to a complex legal matter or assignment and if pre-approved in writing by the City Attorney.
iii. The City will not reimburse Attorneys for ordinary document management systems used for discovery purposes unless such technology is deemed necessary by the City Attorney and if pre-approved in writing by City Attorney. iv. Attorneys agree to directly pay for vendors, consultants, or experts, and then seek reimbursement from the City.
v. Attorneys agree to seek authorization from City Attorney before retaining experts and consultants.
vi. Automobile travel will be reimbursed at the standard mileage rate in effect at the time of billing by the Internal Revenue Service.
vii. Any costs in excess of $5,000 require City Attorney approval prior to incurring the expense. All expenses must have supporting documentation submitted with the invoice.

3. METHOD OF PAYMENT Attorneys shall submit a monthly statement specifying the services performed, dates and number of hours, and an itemization of expenses related thereto with supporting documentation (i.e. receipts, invoices, copy of check, etc.). City acknowledges that the fees incurred for work performed by Attorneys on its behalf are due and owing within 30 days of the work being performed. At Attorneys’ discretion, they may choose to defer payment.

Notwithstanding this, City agrees that it shall tender payment within 30 days of written demand by Attorneys for payment. Unless expressly stated thereon, monthly statements generated by Attorneys shall not constitute written demand, but shall simply be a written reflection of work performed and fees incurred. City will not pay interest on unpaid monthly statements.

4. CONTROL OF LEGAL MATTERS Attorneys agree that each and every matter or proceeding in which they undertake to assist the City Attorney, as aforesaid, shall be and remain under, and subject to the control and direction of said City Attorney at all stages, and that they shall at all times keep the City Attorney informed of all matters pertaining thereto. City will keep Attorneys informed of all significant developments in matters relating to any representation undertaken by Attorneys. Attorneys further agree, if and when their retention hereunder is terminated by City, as hereinafter specified, they shall return to City Attorney any and al l files then in their possession concerning each and every matter or proceeding in which they represented the City pursuant to this Agreement.

5. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Attorneys agree to keep the City Attorney, and any other person(s) designated by the City Attorney, informed of significant events in the Actions, including but not limited to trial date, filing of motions for summary judgment, hearing date for motion for summary judgment, settlement conference date, and mediation date. Attorneys also agree to provide the following reports:

6. TERM The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date first written above and terminate on February 16, 2028 unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 15 below. The term of this Agreement may be extended for up to one (1) year upon a writing executed by both parties, including the City Manager and the City Attorney.

City Council
9 –
4 2/17/2026

3 7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS It is mutually agreed by and between the parties that, in the performance of their covenants hereunder, Attorneys are and shall be independent contractors, and not officers or employees of City.

8. INSURANCE Attorneys shall provide to the City Attorney proof of insurance prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Attorneys shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below:
a. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Off ice Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
b. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if Consultant has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non- owned), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (Not required if consultant does not use an automobile to perform services)
c. Workers’ Compensation : Insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
d. Professional Li ability (Errors and Omissions): Insurance appropriates to the Consultant’s profession, with limit no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate.

If Attorneys maintain broader coverage and/or higher limit s than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by Attorneys. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
e. Other Insurance Provisions - The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
i. Additional Insured Status to include The City of Santa Ana, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy.
ii. Primary Coverage - For any claims related to this contract, Attorneys’ insurance coverage shall be primary coverage as to the City of Santa Ana, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers . Any insurance or self - insurance maintained by the City of Santa Ana, its officers, officials,

City Council
9 –
5 2/17/2026

4 employees, or volunteers shall be excess of Attorneys’ insurance and shall not contribute with it.
iii. Notice of Cancellation- Attorneys agree to provide 30 days advance written notice to the City before cancelling or changing coverage by their insurance broker.
f. Waiver of Subrogation - Attorneys hereby grant to City a waiver of any right to subrogation, which any insurer of said Attorneys may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Attorneys agree to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
g. Self-Insured Retentions - Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Attorneys to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City.
h. Acceptability of Insurers - Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
i. Claims Made Policies - If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims- made basis:
i. The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.
ii. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. iii. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Dat e prior to the contract effective date, the Attorneys must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work. j. Verification of Coverage – Attorneys shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements to Entity before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Attorney’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.

City Council
9 –
6 2/17/2026

5 k. Subcontractors - Attorneys shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Attorneys shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors.

l. Special Risks or Circumstances – City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances

9. INDEMNIFICATION Attorneys agree to and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, and representatives from liability for personal injury, damages, restitution, judicial or equitable relief to the extent caused by Attorneys’ negligent or w rongful performance or conduct related to this Agreement.

10. CONFIDENTIALITY All information and documents shared with Attorneys as well as all work performed by Attorneys in connection with this Agreement should be treated as strictly confidential. Moreover, all communications between Attorneys and City shall be treated as protected by the attorney -client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. Accordingly, information received by Attorneys from City should be kept in a secure place, and no information about this work may be disclosed to any third party without City’s prior written approval.

Attorneys shall provide materials directly to the City Attorney, Sonia C arvalho, or selected members of her office, as directed by the City Attorney. All such information and any written product in connection with Attorneys‘ retention under this Agreement, shall be marked as “PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL / ATTORNEY -WORK PRODUC T” and shall be the property of the City Attorney’s Office, and shall be returned/provided to the Office of the City Attorney with all copies upon the request of the City Attorney. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Attorneys, disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Attorneys without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Attorneys without reference to information disclosed by the City.

11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE Attorneys covenant that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, that would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement.

12. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by telefacsimile or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons:

To City: City Clerk
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, California 92702-1988

City Council
9 –
7 2/17/2026

6 Facsimile (714) 647-6956

Courtesy Copy: City Attorney
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-29)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, California 92702
Facsimile (714) 647-6515

To Attorneys: Horvitz & Levy, LLP
Attn: Justin Sarno, Partner
3601 W. Olive Ave., 8th Floor
Burbank, CA 91505

A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by tel efacsimile, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty -four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded.

13. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Attorneys, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may no t be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Attorneys. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the ter ms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Attorneys or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any parties, which are not embodied herein.

14. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Attorneys, Attorneys may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delega tion or subcontract without the City’s prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City’s ability to have any of the services which are the subject of this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other Attorneys retained by City.

15. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by City at any time. In such event, Attorneys shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Attorneys compensation for all services performed by Attorneys prior to receipt of such notice of termination. As a condition of such payment,

City Council
9 –
8 2/17/2026

7 Attorneys shall deliver to the City all files and records generated under this Agreement as of such date.

Attorneys may terminate this agreement, subject to their obligation to provide written reasonable notice of at least thirty (30) days to arrange alternative representation. In such case, City agrees to secure new counsel as quickly as possible and to cooperate fully in the substitution of the new counsel as counsel of record in the Actions.

16. NON-DISCRIMINATION Attorneys shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, o r disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Attorneys affirm that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations.

17. JURISDICTION – VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, pe rformance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement.

18. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney’s fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn.

19. COUNTERPARTS; SIGNATURES This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, secured via facsimile transmission or otherwise, each of which shall be deemed to be an original.

Photocopies of any executed counterpart shall have the same force and effect as an original. City further acknowledges that it has read and received a copy the full text Section 6148 of the California Business and Professions Code prior to signing this Agreement.

20. NO GUARANTEES City understands and acknowledges that there are certain risks and uncertainties in the pursuit of any matter for which Attorneys have been retained, that law is not an exact science, that Attorneys have made no representations or guarant ees of success regarding the conclusion of any particular matter, and that all expressions relative thereto are matters of Attorneys’ opinion only. In other words, Attorneys make no representations or guarantees of success regarding any matter.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written.

City Council
9 –
9 2/17/2026

8 ATTEST:
_________________________
Jennifer L. Hall
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney
By: _________________________
Sandra M. Flores
Chief Assistant City Attorney

CITY OF SANTA ANA
____________________________
Alvaro Nuñez
City Manager

HORVITZ & LEVY LLP
______________________________
Justin Sarno
Partner

City Council
9 –
10 2/17/2026

Police Department
www.santa-ana.org/pd
Item # 10
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
February 17, 2026
TOPIC: Blood Technician Services

AGENDA TITLE
Agreement with California Forensic Phlebotomy, Inc. for Blood Technician Services (Specification No. 25-135) (General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with California Forensic Phlebotomy, Inc. to provide blood technician services for a term beginning on March 5, 2026 and expiring March 4, 2029, with provisions for two, one-year extensions in an amount not to exceed $374,030 (Agreement No. A-2026-XXX).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

DISCUSSION
In 1992, the City of Santa Ana contracted with a vendor to provide blood technician services to the Santa Ana Police Department. The contracted services include providing blood technician services, seven days per week, 24 hours per day, 365 days a year.

These technicians are responsible for drawing blood in a medically-approved manner, retaining these items through an evidentiary-approved process, and relinquishing them to the Orange County Crime Lab for analysis. The Santa Ana Police Department requests these services to obtain blood samples from individuals that have been involved in incidents where drugs and/or alcohol are suspected.

The City’s current blood technician services agreement with California Forensic Phlebotomy Inc. is set to expire on March 4, 2026. To ensure blood technician services continue uninterrupted, the Police Department issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 25-135 on November 17, 2025, via the City’s online bid management and publication system. A summary of vendor participation and results is as follows:

279 Vendors notified
32 Santa Ana Vendors notified
12 Vendors downloaded the RFP packet

City Council
10 –
1 2/17/2026

Blood Technician Services
February 17, 2026

5 5
7 2
2 Responsive proposals received
0 Responsive proposals received from Santa Ana vendors
Two proposals were submitted by the RFP deadline, which were determined to be responsive to the specifications, and met the City’s requirements. The proposals were evaluated and scored by a committee pursuant to the criteria identified within the RFP.

This included Organization / Completeness of Response, Background, Qualifications & Experience, Key Personnel / Proposed Staffing, Technical Approach / Methodology, and Cost Proposal.

Staff recommends awarding an agreement to the highest-ranked firm, California Forensics Phlebotomy Inc. (Exhibit 1). CFP has been in business since 1982, providing blood technician services. CFP services all Orange County law enforcement agencies, as well as all agencies within San Diego County, in California. CFP employees remain on-call at all times, seven days per week, 24 hours per day, 365 days a year to conduct blood draws as requested. This allows CFP to respond to requests for service within 45 minutes. CFP has extensive experience in the policies and procedures of the Orange County Sheriff’s Department Forensic Sciences Lab, where all blood samples are processed and examined. In addition, CFP employees are required to complete an extensive background check and have access to secured areas. CFP staff also understands the requirements and expectations of the Santa Ana Police Department regarding blood sample draws.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
The current fiscal year funding is available in the FY 25-26 budget and future fiscal year funding will be included in the proposed budgets for City Council consideration as follows:

Fiscal Year Accounting Unit-
Account #
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account Description Amount
FY 25-26
(March - June) 01114420-62300 General Fund
Field Operations,
Contract Services-
Professional
$ 23,250
FY 26-27 01114420-62300 General Fund
Field Operations,
Contract Services-
Professional
$ 70,564
FY 27-28 01114420-62300 General Fund
Field Operations,
Contract Services-
Professional
$ 73,033

City Council
10 –
2 2/17/2026

Blood Technician Services
February 17, 2026

5 5
7 2
FY 28-29 01114420-62300 General Fund
Field Operations,
Contract Services-
Professional
$ 75,590
FY 29-30 01114420-62300 General Fund
Field Operations,
Contract Services-
Professional
$ 78,235
FY 30-31
(July – Feb.) 01114420-62300 General Fund
Field Operations,
Contract Services-
Professional
$ 53,358
Total $374,030
The amounts above are estimates only and are subject to change. If future increases necessitate higher contract authority, this item will be presented to City Council for approval.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Agreement with California Forensic Phlebotomy, Inc.

Submitted By: Robert Rodriguez, Police Chief
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager

City Council
10 –
3 2/17/2026

AGREEMENT WITH CALIFORNIA FORENSIC PHLEBOTOMY

TO PROVIDE BLOOD TECHNICIAN SERVICES

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this 17TH day of February, 2026 by and between California Forensic Phlebotomy, Inc., a California corporation (“Consultant”), and the C ity of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (“City”).

RECITALS

A. On November 17, 2025, the City issued Request for Proposal No. 25-135 (“RFP”) seeking to retain a Consultant having special skill and knowledge in the field of providing blood technician services.

B. Consultant submitted a timely response and represents that it is able and willing to provide such services to the City per the scope of work detailed in the RFP, and attached hereto as Exhibit A to the Agreement.

C. In undertaking the performanc e of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting firm in the field.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES

Consultant shall perform during the term of this Agreement, the tasks and obligations including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required to fully and adequately complete the services described and set forth in Scope of Services - Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

2. COMPENSATION

a. City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services for City, the rates and charges identified in Exhibit B. The total amount to be expended during the initial term of this Agreem ent shall not exceed $374,030. Any remaining balance of the above referenced “not-to-exceed” amount may be subject for use during any optional extension term, per Section 3 below. Con sultant understands that any increase to the compensation amount lis ted here is subject to approval by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana

b. Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. City and Consultant agree that all payments due and owing under this Agreement shall be made through Automated Clearing House (ACH) transfers. Consultant agrees to execute the EXHIBIT 1

City Council
10 –
4 2/17/2026

City’s standard ACH Vendor Payment Authorization and provide required documentation. Upon verification of the data provided, the City will be authorized to deposit payments directly into Consultant’s account(s) with financial institutions.

Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals which may reasonably be expected by City.

3. TERM

This Agreement shall commence on March 5, 2026 and continue for a three (3) year term until March 4, 2029 with the option for the City to grant up to two (2) one (1) year extension(s), exercisable by a writing by the City Manager and the City Attorney, unless terminated earli er in accordance with Section 15, below.

4. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR

Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent Consultant and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in whi ch Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes.

5. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS

This Agreement creates a non -exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other doc uments or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non -exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the sub contractor prepares under this Agreement.

Consultant represents an d warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk.

6. INSURANCE

Insurance requirements are attached hereto as Exhibit C.

City Council
10 –
5 2/17/2026

7. INDEMNIFICATION

Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Consultant, its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on its behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. Thi s indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a thi rd party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant’s services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant.

8. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION

Consultant shall defend and indemni fy the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States’ letters patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in the work product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement.

9. RECORDS

Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from th e date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other d ocuments created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement.

City Council
10 –
6 2/17/2026

10. CONFIDENTIALITY

If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. “Confidential Information” shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City.

11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE

a. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance o f services specified under this Agreement.

b. No immediate family members of either the Mayor, City Council Member, or any appointed City Official, including appointed board and commission members, as defined under the City’s Municipal Code, whose position with the City shall award or influence the aw ard of this Agreement, or any competing contract or amendment thereof, shall be employed in any capacity by the Consultant or have any other direct or indirect financial benefit or interest in this Agreement.

c. The section also prohibits the awarding of any agreement, contract, grant, or any amendment to those awards, to any former full -time employee for one-year from date of employee separation except for any CalPERS retiree as authorized by City Council resolution

d. The Consultant must comply with all c onflict of interest laws, ordinances, and regulations now in effect or hereafter to be enacted during the term of this Agreement.

The Consultant warrants that it is not now aware of any facts which conflict with the prohibitions defined above. If the Consultant hereafter becomes aware of any facts that might reasonably be expected to create a conflict of interest, it must immediately make full written disclosure of such facts to the City. Full written disclosure must include, but is not limited to, identification of all persons implicated and a complete description of all relevant circumstances. Failure to comply with the provisions of this paragraph will be a material breach of this Agreement.

City Council
10 –
7 2/17/2026

e. Consultant covenants that none of its directors, officers, empl oyees, or agents shall participate in selecting or administrating any subcontract supported (in whole or in part) by City funds stemming from the Agreement where the awarding of the subcontract has any direct or indirect financial benefit or interest to any individual, as defined in subsections (b) and (c) above.

12. NON-DISCRIMINATION

Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations.

13. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT

This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Consultant, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein.

14. ASSIGNMENT

Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City’s ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other Consultants retained by City.

15. TERMINATION

This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions:
a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product(s) completed as of such date, and in such case

City Council
10 –
8 2/17/2026

such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate.
b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement.

16. WAIVER

No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies.

17. JURISDICTION - VENUE

This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement.

18. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES

Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement.

19. NOTICE

Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons:

To City:

City Clerk
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988
Fax: 714- 647-6956

City Council
10 –
9 2/17/2026

With courtesy copies to:

Santa Ana Police Department
Attn: Chief of Police
60 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, California 92702

To Consultant:

California Forensics Phlebotomy
8285 E. E. Santa Ana Canyon Road
Suite 135-274
Anaheim Hills, CA 92808
Attn: Robert J. Vega, CEO

A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has b een deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded.

20. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney’s fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement.

[signature page to follow]

City Council
10 –
10 2/17/2026

City Council
10 –
11 2/17/2026

#19793v20

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

City Council
10 –
12 2/17/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Consultant shall perform services as set forth below.

I. Scope of Work

1. Contractor shall provide employees to draw blood in compliance with State approved medical procedures and in conformance with Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations, an d the directions and/or procedures established by the County of Orange at the request of the Santa Ana Police Department.

2. Contractor and/or its employees shall appear in any court in the County of Orange on twenty- four (24) hours notice (and in some instances with less than twenty-four (24) hours notice) at the request of the Orange County District Attorney or the City of Santa Ana , for the purpose of discussion or testimony concerning blood drawing/collecting samples and chain of custody.

Contractor agrees to provide the specific personnel requested by the City of Santa Ana for discussion or testimony concerning drawing/collecting samples and chain of custody. Contractor shall not be entitled to receive additional compensation for such appearances.

3. Contractor agrees that this Contract shall be non -exclusive in that the City of Santa Ana may contract with other persons, firms, or corporations to provide the same or similar services to those set forth herein; and Contractor may engage in performing the same or similar services for other public entities and individuals, provided, however, that Contractor shall not perform such services for other public entites or individuals if it interferes with Contractor's ability to provide services as required by this Contract. Contractor agrees it will not perform services for another public entity or individual if the possibility exists that Contractor or its employees would be required to provide testimony as to the conduct, analysis, and result of such draws in opposition to the same or similar draws conducted by it on behalf of the City of Santa Ana . In other words, Contractor shall not provide services to another public entity or individual that would create a conflict with the services provided to the City of Santa Ana under this Contract. In the event the City of Sa nta Ana has entered into contracts with other parties for the same or similar services, the City of Santa Ana may establish a rotation basis or other method of scheduling its requirements for services under such the City of Santa Ana and agrees to consult with Contractor in establishing such rotation and scheduling, but in any event, the decision of the City of Santa Ana with regard to thereto shall be final.

4. Contractor shall provide transportation for its employees, blood sample request forms, and all other materials necessary to provide services as set forth herein at no additional cost to the City of Santa Ana .

5. Contractor shall provide all medical supplies and equipment necessary to draw blood under this Contract. Such supplies shall consist of the following:
a. Cotton balls, tourniquets, glue sticks, vinyl / latex / and/or nitrile gloves, surgical tape, sanicloths, sani-dex wipes, fingerprint pads, test tube racks, seal cutter, disposable laboratory coats, face shields, cleaning solution, syringes, needles, "Sharps" containers, and any other materials or supplies deemed necessary for drawing blood with state approved medical procedures and in conformance with the methods the County of Orange has on file with the California Department of Health Services, and the directions and/or procedures established by the County of Orange.

6. Contractor and its employees shall print legibly, in ink, on all forms, envelopes, and labels, and shall include the subject's name, the reques ting agency, and the requesting agency's case number where available. Contractor's employees shall also verify that the chain of custody is

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

City Council
10 –
13 2/17/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

complete and legible. Contractor's employees shall properly affix seals to blood vials and shall properly seal blood kits and urine kits.

7. All blood samples (urine samples) shall be refrigerated upon collection and shall remain refrigerated until deposited in the Sheriff-Coroner Crime Lab Refrigerator. Contractor shall provide the supplies necessary to insure that blood samples are refrigerated and transported as required by the County of Orange and this Contract, at no cost to the City of Santa Ana .

8. All blood samples (urine samples) shall be deposited in the Sheriff-Coroner Forensic Refrigerator located at 320 N. Flower St. Santa Ana, CA 92703 prior to the end of the employees work period or prior to 6:00 A.M. (Pacific Time), whichever comes sooner.

9. Contractor's employees shall draw as much blood as possible to fill blood kit vials.

10. "Dry Runs" (defined as a blood draw attempt with no blood collected) and empty blood vials shall not be compensated by the City of Santa Ana . The exact number of dry runs is unknown and cannot be determined in advance, but Contractor must anticipate a certain percentage of calls for assistance under this Contract will result in Dry Runs.

II. Qualification of Contractor's Employees
• 1. Contractor's employees providing services under this Contract shall be licensed to draw blood in compliance with all laws and regulations of the State of California , including, but not limited to, California Vehicle Code section 23158. Contractor's employees and procedures shall be in compliance with Orange County Sheriff-Coroner methods on file with the California Department of Health Services .

2. Contractor's employees are subject to security clearance by County of Orange. Acceptability of background investigation results shall be at the sole discretion of the County of Orange. If the security clearance of a Contractor employee is determined to be unacceptable, Contractor agrees that said employee will not provide services under this Contract.

III. Coverage

1. Contractor shall provide coverage to perform the services herein described, twenty­ four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week, and three hundred sixty-five (365) days a year (366 in leap years), during the Contract term. Such services shall be provided at the request of the City of Santa Ana within the County of Orange.

2. Contractor shall maintain a single local telephone number staffed, twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week, and three hundred sixty-five (365) days a year (366 in leap years) to provide service under this Contract and to receive requests for service. Contractor may use an answering service only if it provides immediate notification and r esponse, and is subject to the time limits set forth in Section III, Coverage, paragraphs 4 and 5.

3. Contractor's employees shall respond, when requested, to any and all locations within the County of Orange, including, but not limited to: 1) Santa Ana Police Department, 2) Orange County hospitals, 3) DUI check points, and 4) Saturation Patrol Areas.

4. Contractor's employees shall arrive at a call for service within the City of Santa Ana within forty-five (45) minutes of Contractor being notified of the request. Notification includes, but is not limited to, notification directly or through a telephone call to Contractor answering service, unless Contractor already has personnel performing services at that location.

5. Contractor's employees shall arrive at a call for service at any location other than Intake Release Center within sixty (60) minutes of Contractor being notified of the request, including, but not

City Council
10 –
14 2/17/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

limited to, notification directly or through a telephone call to Contractor's answering service, unless Contractor already has personnel performing services at that specific location.

6. Contractor shall maintain sufficient employees in an "On-Call" status to meet the requirements of Section III, Coverage, paragraphs 4 and 5 at all times. The City of Santa Ana agrees that all calls for service shall be made through the Santa Ana Police Department dispatcher, except for blood samples collected in relation to traffic collisions with injury and/or other violations of the California Penal Code. In the case of a delayed response by Contractor's employee, the requesting officer shall notify dispatch on the arrival of Contractor's employee, and if further delay occurs, on the initiation of services.

City Council
10 –
15 2/17/2026

#19793v20

EXHIBIT B

COMPENSATION
Fee Proposal including hourly rates if applicable

City Council
10 –
16 2/17/2026

EXHIBIT B – COST PROPOSAL

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Line
Item
Description Quantity Unit of
Measure
Unit
Cost
1 Blood Draw 1 PER $155.00
2 Urine Test Transport 1 PER $110.00
3 Sit-down assignment 1 Hou rly $145.00
D
esired Term: Initial with renewal periods. Renewal pricing will be based on the most current Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index (CPI) data as follows: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA; All Urban Consumers; Not Seasonally Adjusted.

City Council
10 –
17 2/17/2026

#19793v20

EXHIBIT C

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

City Council
10 –
18 2/17/2026

EXHIBIT C – Insurance Requirements

Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the agreement, the following insurance coverages:

MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE

Consultant shall maintain limits of insurance coverage in the following minimum amounts and shall be at least as broad as:

• Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and comp leted operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate.
• Automobile Liability (AL): Insurance Services Office Form CA 00 01 covering Code 1 (any auto), w ith combined single limits of $1,000,000. In the event Consultant does not maintain commercial automobile liability insurance, City will accept evidence of personal automobile insurance, provided that such policy is endorsed for business use and provides coverage with a minimum limit of $1,000,000. Required policy limits can be met with primary and umbrella/excess insurance policies.
• Workers’ Compensation (WC): as required by the State of California, with statutory limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident, per employee, per policy for bodily injury or disease. This requirement can be waived if Consultant has no employees.

If Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in e xcess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to City.

Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. CGL and AL policies: City of Santa Ana , its City Council, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, equipment, and personnel furnished in connection with such work or operations.

2. CGL, AL, and WC policies: Insurance company(ies) agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its City Council, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers f or losses paid under the terms of any policy which arise from work performed by Consultant for City.

3. All required insurance policies: For any claims related to this contract, Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary and any insurance maintained by City, its City Council, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers shall not contribute with it.

4. All required insurance policies: A severability of interest provision must apply for all the additional insureds, ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability.

City Council
10 –
19 2/17/2026

EXHIBIT C – Insurance Requirements

5. Each insurance policy required herein shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, suspended, voided, reduced in coverage or in limits, non -renewed by the carrier, or materially changed except after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to City. Ten (10) days prior written notice shall be provided to City for policy cancellation or non-renewal due to non-payment.

6. Certificate Holder on each Evidence of Insurance certificate shall be : City of Santa Ana, Attention: Santa Ana Police Department, 60 Civic Center Pl aza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. The name and location of the event should be included in the Description of Operations section of each certificate.

Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. City may require Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state of California with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to City.

Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements to Entity before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive Consultant’s obligation to provide them. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.

Claims Made Policies
If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims-made basis:

1. The retroactive date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of work.

2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least three (3) years after completion of work.

3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date prio r to the contract effective date, Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of three (3) years after completion of work.

Subcontractors
Consultant shall require and verify that all sub -contractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from sub-contractors.

Special Risks or Circumstances
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

City Council
10 –
20 2/17/2026

Police Department
www.santa-ana.org/pd
Item # 11
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
February 17, 2026
TOPIC: Digital Forensic Annual License Subscription

AGENDA TITLE
Purchase Order Contract to Magnet Forensics, LLC for Digital Forensic Annual License Subscription (Specification No. 26-010) (General & Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize a Purchase Order to Magnet Forensics, LLC for digital forensic annual license subscription for a one-year term beginning February 21, 2026 and expiring February 20, 2027, in an amount not to exceed $61,395.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

DISCUSSION
Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 2-807(a, e), authorizes the City to make non-bid purchases of services, supplies, materials, and equipment whenever it shall appear that there is only one reasonably available source. Staff researched available procurement options and product offerings in the market and determined that the digital forensic annual license subscription offered by Magnet Forensics, LLC meets the City of Santa Ana Police Department’s specifications.

Additionally, recent studies show over 98% of Americans own a cellphone of some kind and 91% of those own a smartphone. With the proliferation of digital device usage, the Police Department needs the tools to be able to unlock iOS and Android devices to obtain and extract evidence efficiently to solve and prosecute criminal cases. The use of this software can and will only be utilized under specific situations. The accessing of digital evidence requires either consent from the owner of the device or judicial processes such as a search warrant. In Orange County, the issuance of a search warrant requires the review and approval of the District Attorney or City Attorney’s Office, and the approval of the sitting Judge from the Orange County Superior Courts.

City Council
11 –
1 2/17/2026

Digital Forensic Annual License Subscription
February 17, 2026

5 5
7 4
City Council last approved this annual license subscription on February 18, 2025. The vendor is unable to accommodate a multi-year contract. Hence, the Police Department will seek Council authorization for this license subscription on an annual basis.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funds are available in the current year budget in the following accounts:

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit
– Account No.

Fund
Description
Accounting Unit –
Account No. Description Amount
FY 25-26 01114445-66511 General Fund
Special Investigations,
Computer Software
Subscriptions
$29,000
FY 25-26 01214010-66511
Cannabis
Public Benefit
Fund
Police Enforcement
Services, Computer
Software Subscriptions
$32,395
Total $61,395
Submitted By: Robert Rodriguez, Police Chief
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager

City Council
11 –
2 2/17/2026

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 12
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
February 17, 2026
TOPIC: Purchase Order for Traffic Signal Control Devices

AGENDA TITLE
Purchase Order Contracts to AM Signal, LLC, Econolite Control Products, Inc., NexTech Systems, Inc., and Western Systems, Inc. for Traffic Signal Control Devices (Specification No. 25-141) (Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Award Aggregate Purchase Order Contracts to vendors listed below for traffic signal control devices on an as-need basis, in a total aggregate amount not to exceed $200,000, for a one-year term beginning February 17, 2026 through February 16, 2027, with provisions for four, one-year renewal options for a total aggregate amount not to exceed $1,000,000 over a five-year period.

Vendor
AM Signal, LLC
Econolite Control Products, Inc.

NexTech Systems, Inc.

Western Systems, Inc.

Location
Littleton, CO
Anaheim, CA
Irvine, CA
Everett, WA
GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency Engineering Division (PWA) oversees and maintains the daily operations of the City’s traffic signal systems. The traffic signal system is comprised of 326 traffic signals, 137 Audible Pedestrian Signals, 42 Flashing Beacons, 24 Speed Feedback Signs, 140 video detection systems, 175 emergency vehicle preemption systems, 45 fiber optic network hubs, and a Traffic Management Center (TMC) located at City Hall. Traffic signal control devices are used to operate, manage, and monitor traffic signals and pedestrian safety systems throughout the City. These devices are essential to providing safe and efficient accessibility for motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists traveling on City streets and sidewalks. These traffic signal systems require periodic replacement and enhancement to preserve an efficient and safe operating transportation network.

City Council
12 –
1 2/17/2026

Purchase Order for Traffic Signal Control Devices
February 17, 2026

5 5
7 1
Traffic devices frequently require replacement due to aging infrastructure, equipment malfunctions, collisions, or the implementation of engineering safety improvements.

When a device is compromised, it must be replaced as quickly as possible to minimize impacts to public safety and mobility. Furthermore, these devices are specialized and must be replaced on a like-for-like basis to maintain system compatibility, as they are installed and operated in conjunction with existing infrastructure and designed to function with equipment from the same manufacturers. Continued use of the same product line supports operational consistency, reduces training and maintenance costs, ensures reliable system performance, and promotes efficient long-term asset management.

To support the operation and maintenance of these systems, staff requires access to a wide range of traffic signal control devices, electrical materials, supplies, and components. Given the challenges associated with aging infrastructure, staff proactively maintains an inventory of essential supplies at the City’s Corporate Yard to support both routine maintenance and emergency repairs. This level of preparedness helps minimize service disruptions and ensures timely responses to infrastructure issues.

In the last three years, the City has spent an average of $170,000 annually on traffic signal control devices and staff recommends increasing the total contract not to exceed limit to $200,000 annually to account for the rising costs of electrical components and devices. The proposed contracts enable staff to obtain traffic signal control devices and supplies from multiple vendors, ensuring access to necessary products at competitive prices.

Santa Ana Municipal Code, Section 2-807(a), authorizes the City to make non-bid purchases of supplies, materials, and equipment whenever it shall appear that there is only one reasonably available source. Staff researched available procurement options and product offerings in the market and determined that the traffic signal control devices offered by AM Signal, LLC, Econolite Control Products, Inc., NexTech Systems, Inc., and Western Systems, Inc. meet the City’s specifications.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding is available in the current FY 2025-26 budget. The purchase order contracts cover one year and include up to four, one-year renewal options. Year 1 costs span two fiscal years and will be incurred in FY 2025-26 and FY 2026-27. Funding for any renewal years will be included in proposed budgets for City Council consideration. The table below shows the first-year and subsequent year allocations, if exercised.

City Council
12 –
2 2/17/2026

Purchase Order for Traffic Signal Control Devices
February 17, 2026

5 5
7 1
Fiscal Year Accounting
Unit-Account #
Fund
Description Account Description Amount
FY 25-26
(February
17, 2026
– June
30, 2026)
02917620-62300 Special Gas
Tax
Traffic Signal
Maintenance, Contract
Services-Professional
$100,000
FY 26-27
(July 1,
2026 –
February
16, 2027)
02917620-62300 Special Gas
Tax
Traffic Signal
Maintenance, Contract
Services-Professional
$100,000
Annual Total $200,000
Optional Four, One-Year Extensions
FY 26-27
(February
17, 2027
– June 30,
2027)
02917620-62300 Special Gas
Tax
Traffic Signal
Maintenance, Contract
Services-Professional
$100,000
FY 27-28
(July 1,
2027
– February
16, 2028)

02917620-62300 Special Gas
Tax
Traffic Signal
Maintenance, Contract
Services-Professional
$100,000
FY 27-28
(February
17, 2028
– June 30,
2028)
02917620-62300 Special Gas
Tax
Traffic Signal
Maintenance, Contract
Services-Professional
$100,000
FY 28-29
(July 1,
2028 –
February
16, 2029)

02917620-62300 Special Gas
Tax
Traffic Signal
Maintenance, Contract
Services-Professional
$100,000
FY 28-29
(February
17, 2029
– June 30,
2029)
02917620-62300 Special Gas
Tax
Traffic Signal
Maintenance, Contract
Services-Professional
$100,000

City Council
12 –
3 2/17/2026

Purchase Order for Traffic Signal Control Devices
February 17, 2026

5 5
7 1
Fiscal Year Accounting
Unit-Account #
Fund
Description Account Description Amount
FY 29-30
(July 1,
2029 –
February
16, 2030)

02917620-62300 Special Gas
Tax
Traffic Signal
Maintenance, Contract
Services-Professional
$100,000
FY 29-30
(February
17, 2030
– June 30,
2030)
02917620-62300 Special Gas
Tax
Traffic Signal
Maintenance, Contract
Services-Professional
$100,000
FY 30-31
(July 1,
2030 –
February
16, 2031)

02917620-62300 Special Gas
Tax
Traffic Signal
Maintenance, Contract
Services-Professional
$100,000
Five Year Total $1,000,000
Submitted By: Rodolfo Rosas, P.E., Acting Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager

City Council
12 –
4 2/17/2026

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 13
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
February 17, 2026
TOPIC: Award an Agreement to Creative Outdoor Advertising of America, Inc., for Management of Advertising Services at Bus Stops

AGENDA TITLE
Award an Agreement to Creative Outdoor Advertising of America, Inc., for Management of Advertising Services at Bus Stops (Specification No. 25-107) (General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute an agreement with Creative Outdoor Advertising of America, Inc., to sell space to advertisers at bus stops throughout the City for a term beginning February 17, 2026, and expiring February 16, 2029, with provisions for two, one-year extensions (Agreement No. A-2026-XXX).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On January 18, 2022, the City entered into an agreement with Focus Media Group, Inc. (FMG) for bus stop maintenance and advertising, with provisions for the City to receive revenue after deduction for maintenance costs. FMG generally performed contract maintenance well, however, it failed to generate sufficient advertising revenue, resulting in no revenue share to the City. After FMG was acquired by Creative Outdoor Advertising (COA) in June 2024, COA demonstrated strong advertising expertise but limited maintenance capacity. Efforts to increase sales have been successful, yet insufficient to fully cover the maintenance costs.

As a result of a competitive procurement process, Staff recommends the City enter into a new agreement with COA to solely provide advertising at City bus stops throughout the City. The agreement would replace the existing advertising and maintenance agreement with FMG. Staff recommends terminating the existing agreement with FMG (now COA) because: 1) the maintenance service levels provided did not result in sufficiently clean locations, 2) none of the expected revenue materialized because the revenue share was net of FMG’s maintenance costs, and 3) resulted in additional expenditures by the City to pay for enhanced maintenance services.

The new agreement with COA would allow COA to advertise at bus stops in the City and provide the City with guaranteed minimum revenue of $160,000 per year, however, it will

City Council
13 –
1 2/17/2026

Agreement for Bus Stop Advertising
February 17, 2026

5 5
0 2
not include a maintenance function. Maintenance at the City’s bus stops will be provided separately through the Clean Cities Program; a more comprehensive program provided through the City’s existing refuse agreement with Republic Services, which includes bus stop cleaning services at no additional cost to the City.

Separating advertising services from maintenance responsibilities represents a change from the prior contract structure, however, this approach aligns with industry practice among comparable municipalities and allows each contractor to focus on its core expertise. Under this structure, the City receives guaranteed advertising revenue that is no longer offset by maintenance costs.

DISCUSSION
The City of Santa Ana is a major user of Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) bus services, with 24 active bus routes and 648 bus stops located throughout the City. These routes support an estimated 29,000 average weekday passenger boardings. The Public Works Agency (PWA) is responsible for maintaining all bus stop amenities, including shelters, benches, and trash receptacles. Maintenance activities include routine trash collection and power washing, as well as the repair or replacement of damaged furniture, lighting, and decorative or artistic elements at bus stops.

Maintenance needs are not uniform across the City, as certain routes or corridors require more frequent or enhanced maintenance due to higher usage levels and incidents of vandalism.

On January 18, 2022, the City Council awarded an agreement to Focus Media Group, Inc. (FMG) for bus shelter maintenance and advertising services. In June 2024, FMG announced that it had been acquired by Creative Outdoor Advertising (COA), which subsequently assumed all of FMG’s contractual agreements, including the agreement with the City. Under the agreement, advertising revenue was intended to fully offset the cost of bus shelter maintenance with any net revenue being remitted to the City on an established revenue-sharing structure. The revenue share agreement would provide the City 25% of gross revenue advertisement sales minus the cost of maintaining the bus stops.

However, actual maintenance costs exceeded the level of service that could be supported by the advertising revenue alone, and to date, the City has not received any advertising revenue under this agreement.

At the time of the original procurement, the Request for Proposals sought a single contractor to provide bus shelter maintenance, advertising sales, and installation and management of billboards. Under that procurement structure, FMG was effectively the only proposer willing to assume responsibility for the maintenance obligations in addition to advertising services.

Major outdoor advertising and billboard companies expressed limited interest in submitting proposals because the solicitation required firms to provide both maintenance and advertising services to bus stops as well as to billboards, whereas many advertising firms specialize solely in advertising sales and asset management at bus stops or at billboards and do not operate maintenance programs.

City Council
13 –
2 2/17/2026

Agreement for Bus Stop Advertising
February 17, 2026

5 5
0 2
As a result, competition for the contract was limited, and the City’s options were constrained by market realities at the time. Staff’s subsequent experience demonstrated that combining maintenance and advertising responsibilities under a single vendor reduced competition and ultimately contributed to performance challenges.

Maintenance service levels ultimately proved insufficient to meet community expectations.

On April 1, 2023, the City Council approved a supplemental agreement with FMG to provide expanded maintenance services at a cost not to exceed $250,000 over a two-year term ending on April 1, 2025. Despite these efforts, the City continued to receive more than 200 service requests annually, most related to excessive trash accumulation and unsanitary conditions. As a result, no additional funding was granted to continue this service model, and the supplemental agreement was allowed to expire.

In response to these lessons learned, the current procurement intentionally separated maintenance from advertising services. This approach allowed firms specializing in advertising sales to compete without assuming maintenance risk and resulted in proposals better aligned with each firm’s operational strengths while ensuring that maintenance services are provided separately through the City’s existing maintenance programs. COA will be responsible for labor associated with replacing plexiglass panels, while the City will supply the replacement materials, remove graffiti, service the refuse bins, and ensure the bus stops are in clean and sanitary condition.

PWA subsequently implemented a revised maintenance strategy focused on improving service delivery while reducing costs. Bus stop maintenance responsibilities were absorbed by existing public works programs, namely, the Clean City Program under the existing refuse agreement with Republic Services at no additional cost to the City, resulting in approximately $125,000 in annual savings. With maintenance services reassigned, PWA issued a Request for Proposals focused solely on bus shelter advertising sales in order to maximize the revenue to the City.

Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 25-107 was issued on August 4, 2025 on the City’s online bid management and publication system, PlanetBids. A summary of vendor participation and results is as follows:
859 Vendors notified
1 Santa Ana vendor notified
21 Vendors downloaded the RFP packet
2 Responsive proposals received
0 Responsive proposals received from Santa Ana vendors
Proposals were solicited, opened on August 19, 2025, and evaluated. Two proposals were submitted by the RFP deadline and were determined to be responsive to the specifications and they met the City’s requirements.

City Council
13 –
3 2/17/2026

Agreement for Bus Stop Advertising
February 17, 2026

5 5
0 2
Local Outreach Efforts
The Purchasing Division advertised RFP No. 25-107 on the City’s online bid management and publication system, which directly notified two Santa Ana vendors. No Santa Ana vendors downloaded the RFP or submitted a bid for consideration.

An evaluation committee reviewed and rated the proposals based on qualifications, experience with bus shelter advertising, proposed profit-sharing structure, and references.

Based on this evaluation, the firms were ranked as follows:

Firm City Rank
Creative Outdoor Advertising of
America Inc. Sherman Oaks, California 1
My Emerald Hands LLC San Diego, California 2
Staff recommends awarding an agreement to the highest ranking firm, Creative Outdoor Advertising of America, Inc. (COA) (Exhibit 1). COA, a privately held company established in 1984, employs approximately 120 full- and part-time staff and operates public amenity advertising programs across more than 300 municipalities in North America. The company manages over 45,000 advertising units and serves thousands of clients across local, regional, and national markets. Company materials and investor statements indicate that COA has expanded significantly over the past decade, managing tens of thousands of advertising units across more than 300 municipalities and achieving notable financial performance improvements under previous ownership, including an increase in Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA).

COA’s proposal emphasizes maximizing advertising revenue through data-driven sales strategies. The firm will proactively identify and pursue potential advertisers and provide auditable monthly reports detailing advertising sales, occupancy rates, and total revenue generated. In addition, COA will implement a comprehensive digital management system to oversee advertising operations, including the use of barcodes and scanners to uniquely identify and track each advertising location and asset citywide.

COA’s revenue projections are based on 160 advertising units with 320 advertising faces.

Staff reviewed the assumptions supporting these projections, including anticipated occupancy rates, market advertising rates, and COA’s demonstrated experience selling advertising in comparable municipal markets. Staff also evaluated current utilization of advertising space in Santa Ana and determined the projections to be reasonable and achievable under current market conditions. Most importantly, the agreement provides the City with a Minimum Annual Guarantee (MAG) of $160,000 regardless of actual advertising performance, ensuring predictable revenue even if projections are not fully realized. The proposed revenue-sharing structure provides the City with either a MAG of $160,000, paid in equal monthly installments, or 55% of gross advertising revenue, whichever is greater, regardless of advertising performance, provided the minimum inventory of 160 advertising units and 320 advertising faces is maintained.

City Council
13 –
4 2/17/2026

Agreement for Bus Stop Advertising
February 17, 2026

5 5
0 2
Unlike the prior agreement, the proposed agreement does not allow maintenance costs to be deducted from advertising revenues, nor does it reduce payments to the City if COA’s revenue projections are not met, provided the minimum inventory of 160 advertising units and 320 advertising faces is maintained. The City currently meets the minimum inventory and has more bus shelters planned for installation this year, further strengthening our capacity to maintain minimum advertising faces. At minimum, the City will receive $160,000 annually with the potential for higher revenues if advertisement sales exceed the guaranteed amount (MAG).

The proposed agreement structure establishes clear financial incentives for COA to actively pursue advertising sales and maximize program revenue. Under the agreement, COA is responsible for all advertising sales activities and is compensated through advertising revenue, while the City receives either a MAG or a percentage of gross advertising revenue, whichever is greater. Because COA’s financial return increases only when advertising occupancy and rates increase, the agreement inherently incentivizes the contractor to actively market available advertising space, pursue higher-value advertising contracts, and maintain high occupancy rates.

The agreement also requires regular reporting of advertising activity, occupancy rates, and revenue performance, allowing Staff to monitor program performance and address any issues promptly. The contractor’s continued success under the agreement depends on maintaining strong relationships with advertisers, demonstrating reliable service delivery, and consistently filling advertising inventory with paying clients.

By separating maintenance responsibilities from advertising operations, the revised structure allows the contractor to focus exclusively on advertising performance. This focused responsibility, combined with guaranteed payments to the City and performance transparency, creates ongoing motivation for the contractor to innovate marketing approaches, pursue premium advertisers, and maximize revenue generation throughout the term of the agreement.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
Revenues from this agreement will be budgeted in the General Fund-Public Works Revenues, Bus Shelter Fees revenue account (No. 01117002-51004). Future revenues will be budgeted in the General Fund-Public Works Revenues, Bus Shelter Fees revenue account (No. 01117002-51004) and appropriated in the General Fund-Bus Shelter Program-Service Enhancement expenditure accounting unit (No. 01117621).

City Council
13 –
5 2/17/2026

Agreement for Bus Stop Advertising
February 17, 2026

5 5
0 2
Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit-
Account #
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account Description
Amount
FY 25-26
(Feb-June)
01117002-
51004
Public Works
Revenues
Bus Shelter Fees $65,000
FY 26-27 01117002-
51004
Public Works
Revenues
Bus Shelter Fees $160,000
FY 27-28 01117002-
51004
Public Works
Revenues
Bus Shelter Fees $160,000
FY 28-29
(July-Feb)
01117002-
51004
Public Works
Revenues
Bus Shelter Fees $95,000
Subtotal $480,000
Optional Two, 1-Year Extensions
FY 28-29
(Feb-June)
01117002-
51004
Public Works
Revenues
Bus Shelter Fees $65,000
FY 29-30 01117002-
51004
Public Works
Revenues
Bus Shelter Fees $160,000
FY 29-30
(Jul-Feb)
01117002-
51004
Public Works
Revenues
Bus Shelter Fees $95,000
Subtotal $320,000
TOTAL $800,000

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Agreement with Creative Outdoor Advertising of America Inc.

Submitted By: Rodolfo Rosas, P.E., Acting Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager

City Council
13 –
6 2/17/2026

AGREEMENT BETWEEN CREATIVE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING AND THE CITY

OF SANTA ANA
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this 17 th day of February, 2026, by and between Creative Outdoor Advertising of America, Inc., a Florida corporation ("Vendor"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City").

RECITALS
A. City issued Request for Proposal ("RFP") No. 25-107 seeking to retain a vendor having special skill and knowledge in the field of managing advertising programs at designated bus stops and bus shelters in the City.

B. Vendor submitted a responsive proposal to RFP 25-107 that was selected by the City.

C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Vendor represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Vendor under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional firm in the field.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Vendor shall perform during the term of this Agreement, the tasks and obligations including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required to fully and adequately complete the services described in the Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

2. COMPENSATION
a. Vendor shall pay the City the greater of (1) a minimum annual guarantee (MAG) of $160,000; or (2) Fifty-five percent of the gross advertising sales revenue, generated from the advertising program, as described in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. As used herein, "gross advertising sales revenue" shall refer to all amounts billed and/or collected by Vendor without any deduction. b. Payment by Vendor shall be made to City on a monthly basis pursuant to direction provided by City. Payments shall be made payable to the City at the following address:

City of Santa Ana, Public Works Agency, Attn: Administrative Services Manager, 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21), PO Box 1988, Santa Ana, CA 92702. c. A charge often percent (10%) shall be applied to any late payments due to City.

3. TERM

City Council
13 –
7 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
8 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
9 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
10 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
11 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
12 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
13 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
14 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
15 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
16 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
17 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
18 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
19 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
20 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
21 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
22 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
23 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
24 2/17/2026

City Council
13 –
25 2/17/2026

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 14
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
February 17, 2026
TOPIC: Award of a Construction Contract to Excel Paving Co. for the Construction the Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Project

AGENDA TITLE
Award of a Construction Contract to Excel Paving Co. for the Construction of the Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements Project (Project No. 17-6883) (General & Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $200,000 of spendable fund balance in the Public Works Water Revenue and Water Utility Capital, Transfer from Fund 060 revenue accounts, and appropriate to the Water – Interfund Transfer, Transfer to Fund 066 and Water Utility Capital Projects, Water Capital Project expenditure accounts (Requires five affirmative votes).

2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Improvement Program to include an additional $200,000 in construction funds for the Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements Project (No. 17-6883).

3. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $2,362,238, which includes $1,889,790 for the construction contract, $283,469 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and $188,979 for unanticipated or unforeseen work.

4. Award a construction contract to Excel Paving Co, the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $1,889,790, subject to change orders, for construction of the Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements Project (No. 17-6883), for a term beginning February 17, 2026, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

City Council
14 –
1 2/17/2026

Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements February 17, 2026

5 5
3 1

DISCUSSION
The Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements Project (No. 17-6883) will add a new right-turn pocket in the southbound travel lane of Bristol Street, north of Memory Lane. Proposed intersection improvements include relocating curb/gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, and public/private utilities along a 350 foot section to accommodate the new right-turn pocket on south bound Bristol Street, north of Memory Lane. Once completed, these improvements will complement recently completed improvements from Memory Lane to Santa Clara Avenue resulting in a completed intersection, enhancing the roadway capacity, ride quality, and visual appearance of the Bristol Street corridor. The proposed Bristol Street and Memory Lane intersection improvement project is the last remaining corridor improvement project that will finalize and complete the Bristol Street Widening Project initiated in January of 2000.

Project History
The Bristol Street Widening Project was planned as a long-term Capital Improvement Project to be completed in multiple phases as funding becomes available. The initial phases (Phases 1 and 2) were completed in 2002 and included improvements from St.

Andrew Place to McFadden Avenue and from Elm Street to Memory Lane. Since then, additional enhancements have been completed at key intersections, including Bristol Street and Warner Avenue, Bristol Street and 171h Street, as well as segments between McFadden Avenue and Civic Center Drive, and from Washington Avenue to 18th Street.

On September 17, 2024, the City Council approved the construction contract award for Bristol Improvements Phase 3, covering Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue, which is near completion. On March 4, 2025, the City Council approved the construction contract award for Bristol Street Improvements Phase 4, covering Warner Avenue to St. Andrew Place, and is currently under construction. With the approval of this final project and the current construction of Phase 3 and Phase 4 well underway and on schedule, Staff anticipates that the Bristol Street Widening Project that was initiated by the City in 2000 will be completed by December 2026.

Grant Funding
This project was funded through a matching grant program. At the time of application in 2023, the total estimated project cost was $2,002,640, with 75% ($1,501,900) requested from and awarded by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) under the Measure M2 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program (CTFP), and 25% ($500,740) provided as the required local match. The City received the full amount requested from OCTA.

As reflected in the results of the competitive bidding process, the project’s actual total delivery cost is $2,362,238, due to market conditions. The OCTA grant amount is capped at the awarded level; per OCTA guidelines, pursuing additional funding would require canceling the existing award and reapplying the following grant cycle, adding at

City Council
14 –
2 2/17/2026

Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements February 17, 2026

5 5
3 1
least a 12 month delay with no guarantee that a new application would be awarded. In order to complete and deliver the project under current market conditions, an additional $359,598 in local funds is necessary to cover the difference.

Project Advertisement and Contractor Procurement
To provide local vendors with an opportunity to submit bids, the City notified 88 regional vendors via PlanetBids, many of whom are Santa Ana-based. Furthermore, staff specifically contacted Santa Ana vendors to encourage their participation in bids. A total of three (3) bids were received. No bids were received from Santa Ana contractors.

As required by law, a Notice Inviting Bids was advertised in the Orange County Register on October 10, 2025, and October 14, 2025. The project was also advertised in PlanetBids from October 1, 2025, to October 17, 2025. Bids were received electronically via PlanetBids on October 17, 2025. No bid protests were submitted by any bidders during the bid protest period.

A copy of construction plans, contracts, specifications, and all related reference materials (such as The Greenbook) is available for public review at the City’s Public Works Agency, Central Files office located in City Hall.

Bid Results Summary
RANK BIDDER’S NAME LOCATION BID
1 Excel Paving Co. Long Beach, CA $1,889,790
2 All American Asphalt Corona, CA $2,399,329
3 Onyx Paving Company, Inc. Yorba Linda, CA $2,425,000
A total of three (3) responsive bids were received. Excel Paving Co. submitted the lowest responsive bid of $1,889,790 (Exhibit 2). Based on the bid analysis and a contractor’s reference check, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to Excel Paving Co. (Exhibit 3).

Excel Paving Co. has performed work as a prime contractor in the City of Santa Ana in the past five (5) years, including projects such as West Willits Protected Bike Lanes, Safe Routes to School at Davis Elementary, and Miscellaneous Storm Drain Repairs.

The contractor satisfactorily completed these projects, and staff recommends awarding the construction contract to Excel Paving Co. (Exhibit 3) Project Delivery
To deliver a complete project, the estimated total project delivery cost includes a budget allocation for construction administration, inspection, and testing, in addition to the construction contract. Construction administration and inspection may be performed by either Staff or consultants and includes construction management; inspection of the Contractor’s work to ensure contract compliance, workmanship, and quality; materials

City Council
14 –
3 2/17/2026

Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements February 17, 2026

5 5
3 1
testing; and implementation of labor requirements. Any allocated construction administration funds not spent are considered project savings and returned to the respective fund balance upon project closeout.

As indicated in the Cost Analysis and as summarized in the table below, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $2,362,238.

Project Item Total
Construction Contract Bid Amount $1,889,790
Construction Administration $151,469
Inspection $96,000
Testing $36,000
Unanticipated or Unforeseen Work $188,979
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST $2,362,238
Project Schedule and Contract Time
The project is estimated to be completed in August 2026, barring unforeseeable conditions such as rain, natural disasters, or other delays beyond the control of the City and of the Contractor. The contract time for this project is 90 working days, as specified in the bid documents. Working days are counted in accordance with the City’s Standard Specifications, which exclude weekends, City-observed holidays, and inclement weather days that prevent work.

The contractor was required to submit a construction schedule as part of their bid to expedite project delivery. The projected completion date, based on the submitted schedule, falls within the allotted 90 working days. If the contractor fails to deliver on time, they will be assessed a penalty of $3,300 per calendar day as specified in the bid documents.

Project Milestones
Milestone Estimated
Completion
Notes
Administrative Startup February 2026 Contract execution, bonds, insurance
Material Procurement March 2026 Procurement may take place concurrently with construction.

Contractor Mobilization April 2026 Start of construction activities Project Completion August 2026 Based on 90 working days

City Council
14 –
4 2/17/2026

Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements February 17, 2026

5 5
3 1
Project Phasing
The contractor will be constructing this project in a singular phase, fulfilling the scope of work as outlined in the contract documents. The contractor is responsible for determining the scheduling and sequencing of activities based on their proposed means and methods.

Public Outreach
The project scope will impact nearby businesses and residents. To ensure timely and effective communication, the following notification measures will be implemented prior to the start of construction:
• Electronic message signs will be installed two weeks in advance of construction activities to provide early notice of the project’s start date, • A project information sign will be posted at the construction site, including contact information for public inquiries,
• Residents and businesses within 1,000 feet of the project limits will receive door hangers or mailed notifications at least two weeks before construction begins, • A second round of notification will be issued 48 hours prior to the start of construction to residents and businesses adjacent to the limits of work, and • The City will also disseminate information through its official website and social media platforms to keep the public informed of construction activities, including any lane closures.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
In 1990, the City Council approved the Bristol Street Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR No. 89-01). Due to minor design modifications, an Addendum to the FEIS/EIR was prepared and adopted by City Council on December 5, 2017, pursuant to the California Environmental Act (Exhibit 4). The proposed project complies with the adopted Environmental Impact Report.

FISCAL IMPACT
As indicated in the Cost Analysis, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $2,362,228. All funds are available for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2025-26. Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be carried forward into Fiscal Year 2026-2027.

The proposed contract authorizes staff a maximum of 10% for construction contract change orders for unanticipated or unforeseen work. Staff will return to the City Council for authorization and appropriation of additional contingency if necessary.

Approval of the requested appropriation adjustment will recognize $200,000 from the spendable fund balance in the Public Works Water Revenue and Water Utility Capital, Transfer from Fund 060 revenue account, and appropriate the same amount to the

City Council
14 –
5 2/17/2026

Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements February 17, 2026

5 5
3 1
Water – Interfund Transfer, Transfer to Fund 066, and Acquisition & Construction, Water Utility Capital Projects, Water Capital Project expenditure account. Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the current fiscal year will be presented to the City Council for approval of carryovers to Fiscal Year 2026-2027.

Approval of the request to reallocate funds will provide a total of $260,238 in unspent funds from Project 23-6702.

Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit – Account
No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account Description Amount

CURRENT BUDGET
2025-26 05917663-66220
(17-6883)
Select Street
Construction
Gas Tax HUTA 2103,
Improvements Other
Than Building
$400,000
2025-26 03217663-66220
(17-6883)
CTFP Grant –
Measure M
Street
Construction
Measure M2
Competitive Street,
Improvements Other
Than Building
$1,501,900

APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT
2025-26 06617647-66301
(17-6883)
Water
Acquisition &
Construction
Water Utility Capital
Projects, Water
Capital Project
$200,000

REALLOCATION
2025-26
05917663-66220
(From 23-6702
to 17-6883)
Select Street
Construction
HUTA 2103 Gas Tax,
Improvements Other
Than Buildings
$260,338
TOTAL $2,362,228

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Location Map

2. Bid Proposal

3. Construction Contract

4. Environmental Determination

5. Capital Improvement Project Worksheet
Submitted By: Rodolfo Rosas, P.E., Acting Executive Director – Public Works Agency
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager

City Council
14 –
6 2/17/2026

PWASANTA ANAPUBLIC WORKS AGENCYProject No. 17-6883:Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection ImprovementsLocation Map EXHIBIT 1

City Council
14 –
7 2/17/2026

City Council
14 –
8 2/17/2026

City Council
14 –
9 2/17/2026

City Council
14 –
10 2/17/2026

City Council
14 –
11 2/17/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
PROJECT 17-6883

BRISTOL STREET AND MEMORY LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS This CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT is made and entered into this 17th day of February, 2026 by and between the City of Santa Ana, California, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter "CITY"), and Excel Paving Co (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR") ..

WITNESSETH:

The CITY and the CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows:

1. CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all the work and furnish all the materials at its own cost and expense necessary to construct and complete in a good and workmanlike manner and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the CITY, Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements (hereinafter referred to as the "WORK OF IMPROVEMENr') identified in and in accordance with the Contract Documents prepared by the City's Public Works Agency and approved by the City Council.

2. The complete Construction Contract consists of the "Contract Documents" as defined by the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and which include the following:
• Notice Inviting Bids
• Information to Bidders
• Bid Proposal
• Bid Bond
• Contract Form
• Contract Bonds
• General Provisions
• Special Provisions
• Technical Provisions and Project Plans
• Community Workforce Agreement
• Appendices
In case of conflict between the Contract Documents, the precedence of documents shall be as established in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction.

3. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT the sum total amount not to exceed One Million Eight Hundred Eighty Nine Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety and No Cents ($1,889,790), as set forth and identified in the itemized BID PROPOSAL uploaded by the Contractor to PlanetBids, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A".

The BID PROPOSAL contains a schedule of unit price(s) or lump sum(s) based on approximate quantities only, and the City does not expressly or by implication agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class or portion of the work or to omit portions of the work as may be deemed necessary or advisable. rev. 09/01/2017 Page 1 of 3

City Council
14 –
12 2/17/2026

City Council
14 –
13 2/17/2026

City Council
14 –
14 2/17/2026

Exhibit A

City Council
14 –
15 2/17/2026

City Council
14 –
16 2/17/2026

City Council
14 –
17 2/17/2026

City Council
14 –
18 2/17/2026

City Council
14 –
19 2/17/2026

1,889,790.00

City Council
14 –
20 2/17/2026

jmf 11/ 15/ 17
RESOLUTION NO. 2017- 077

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA ANA APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO THE FINAL

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT /
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 89- 01 FOR THE

BRISTOL STREET WIDENING PROJECT PERTAINING TO

THE INTERSECTION OF BRISTOL STREET AND MEMORY
LANE

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows:

A. On November 19, 1990, the City Council approved the Final Environmental Impact Statement / Environmental Impact Report No. 89- 01 (" FEIS/ EIR") for the widening of a 3. 9 -mile segment of Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane, hereinafter referred to as the " Project".

B. The California Environmental Quality Act (" CEQA") requires that if there are minor technical changes or additions to a project, and no new or substantially more severe significant effects result, an addendum to an approved EIR must be prepared.

C. The City Council has previously considered and approved various addenda to the FEIS/ EIR, most recently in 2015 for design modifications to Phase IV of the Project, between Warner Avenue and Saint Andrew Place.

D.To address minor design modifications to the Project concerning the Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection, a further Addendum has been prepared, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A ("Addendum").

E. On December 5, 2017, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15164, the City Council considered for approval this Addendum to the FEIS/ EIR.

Section 2. The City Council previously approved and adopted the FEIS/EIR for the Project. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the Addendum to the FEIS/ EIR was prepared for the Project. Based upon the studies, the City Council determines that there are no new significant impacts or any increases in the severity of the impacts previously identified in the original FEIS/ EIR. The City Council hereby approves the Addendum to the FEIS/EIR, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated as though fully set forth herein.

Resolution No. 2017- 077

City Council
14 –
21 2/17/2026

Section 3. These decisions are based upon the Request for Council Action dated December 5, 2017, and exhibits attached thereto; the public comments; and the Final Environmental Impact Study / Environmental Impact Report No. 89-01, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 4. The City Council directs that any necessary Notice of Determination be prepared and filed with the Clerk of the County of Orange in the matter as required by law.

Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution.

ADOPTED this 5thday of December, 2017.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
By:

AA M. Funk
Assistant City Attorney
AYES: Councilmembers
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers
Resolution No. 2017- 077

Benavidez, Sarmiento Solorio Villegas ( 4)
Martinez ( 1)
Sarmiento ( 1)

City Council
14 –
22 2/17/2026

jmf 11/ 15/ 17

CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Maria D. Huizar, Clerk of the Council, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2017-077 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on December 5, 2017.

Date:
r ;
A,";, -
Maria D. Huizar
Clerk of the Council
City of Santa Ana
Resolution No. 2017- 077

City Council
14 –
23 2/17/2026

Refer to Laserfiche
for " Exhibit A"
Resolution No. 2017- 077

City Council
14 –
24 2/17/2026

FINAL

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol Street and Memory Lane
Intersection Improvements
Project No. 17- 6883
Lead Agency:

CITY OF SANTA ANA

PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, California 92702
Contact Kenny Nguyen
714. 647. 5632
Prepared by:

MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL
5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 500
Sante Ana, California 92707
Contact Ms. Kristen Bogue
949.472. 3505
Approved on December 5, 2017
JN 161391

City Council
14 –
25 2/17/2026

This document is designedfor double -sided printing to conservenatural resources.

City Council
14 –
26 2/17/2026

3. 2

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemoryLaneIntersection ImprovementsProjectNo. 17-6883

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Biological Resources...........................................................................................................

1. 0 INTRODUCTION 1- 1
Cultural Resources..............................................................................................................

1. 1 Purpose of an Addendum.................................................................................................... 1- 2

1. 2 Project Location.................................................................................................................. 1- 3

1. 3 Project Background............................................................................................................. 1- 6 3- 13

1. 3. 1 Approved 1990 Final EIR/ EIS............................................................................... 1- 6 Hydrology and Water Quality........................................................................................... 3- 17

1. 4 Project Description.............................................................................................................. 1- 8 3- 19

1. 4. 1 Proposed Intersection Improvements..................................................................... 1- 8 3- 20

1.4. 2 Proposed Property Acquisition.............................................................................. 1- 8 3- 20

1. 4. 3 Changes as Compared to the Approved Project ................................................... 1- 10

1. 4. 4 Construction Timeframe...................................................................................... 1- 10

1.5 Discretionary Actions........................................................................................................ 1- 12

1. 6 Clarifications to the Addendum Upon Certification......................................................... 1- 12

2. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST......................................................................................... 2- 1

2. 1 Background......................................................................................................................... 2- 1

3. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES................................................................................ 3- 1

3. 1 Aesthetics............................................................................................................................ 3- 1

3.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources................................................................................... 3- 3

3. 3 Air Quality.......................................................................................................................... 3- 4

3. 4 Biological Resources........................................................................................................... 3- 7

3. 5 Cultural Resources.............................................................................................................. 3- 8

3.6 Geology and Soils............................................................................................................... 3- 9 3- 27

3. 7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions............................................................................................... 3- 12

3. 8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials..................................................................................... 3- 13

3.9 Hydrologyand Water Quality...........................................................................................3- 17

3.10 Land Use and Planning..................................................................................................... 3- 19

3. 11 Mineral Resources............................................................................................................. 3- 20

3. 12 Noise................................................................................................................................. 3- 20

3.13 Population and Housing.................................................................................................... 3- 22

3. 14 Public Services.................................................................................................................. 3- 23

3. 15 Recreation......................................................................................................................... 3- 24

3. 16 Transportation/ Traffic....................................................................................................... 3- 25

3. 17 Tribal Cultural Resources................................................................................................. 3- 27

3. 18 Utilities and Service Systems............................................................................................ 3- 28

3.19 Mandatory Findings of Significance................................................................................. 3- 30

4. 0 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................ 4- 1 APPENDICES:

Appendix A Modified Initial Study Checklist
FinalI December2017 1 Table of Contents

City Council
14 –
27 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Imorovements — Proiect No. 17-6883

LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1 Regional Vicinity................................................................................................................... 1- 4 ExhibitSite Vicinity............................................................................................................................ 1- 5 Exhibit 3 Existing Land Uses (1990 FEIS/ EIR).................................................................................... 1- 7 Exhibit Proposed Lane Geometries..................................................................................................... 1- 9 Exhibit 5 Bristol Street/Memory Lane Intersection Configuration ( 1990 FEIS/ EIR) ......................... 1- 11 Exhibit 6 Memorandum: Landscape Strip Exception.......................................................................... 1- 13

LIST OF TABLES
Table Proposed Property Acquisition............................................................................................... 1- 8 FinalI December2017 ii Table of Contents

City Council
14 –
28 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Section
AAQS ambient air quality standards
AB Assembly Bill
AM ante meridiem
APN Assessor Parcel Number
AQMP Air Quality Management Plant
C1 Community Commercial
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CAP Climate Action Plan
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CO carbon monoxide
CO2 carbon dioxide
CPRC California Public Resources Code
CWA Clean Water Act
DOC Department of Conservation
EIR Environmental Impact Report
EIS Environmental Impact Statement
EPA U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
etc. etcetera
FEIS/ EIR Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FTIP Federal Transportation Improvement Program
GC General Commercial
GHG greenhouse gas
I Interstate
LOS Level of Service
LR - 7 Low Density Residential
mph miles per hour
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
No. number
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
03 ozone
OCTD Orange County Transit District
PM post meridiem
PM10 particulate matter less than less than or equal to 10 microns in diameter FinalI December2017 111 Table of Contents

City Council
14 –
29 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 PMrs particulate matter less than less than or equal to 2. 5 microns in diameter R1 Single -Family Residential
ROW right- of- way
RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Program
RTP/ SCS Regional Transportafion Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCH State Clearinghouse
SD27 Speck Development
SIPS state implementation plans
SR State Route
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
TCE Temporary Construction Easement
TCMs Transportation Control Measures
TPD tons per day
UBC Uniform Building Code
U. S. United States
UST underground storage tank
FinalI December2017 iv Table of Contents

City Council
14 –
30 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883

1. 0 INTRODUCTION
This Addendum has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA), as amended, to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the proposed changes to the widening of Bristol Street, from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane as proposed in the Project Final Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Impact Report No. 89- 01 ( FEIS/ EIR) approved in 1990 ( FHWA- CA- EIS- 89- 01- F; State Clearinghouse [ SCH] No. 87071509).

This Addendum focuses on the intersection of Bristol Street and Memory Lane ( the Project), situated in the northern segment of the Bristol Street Widening Project This Addendum provides an assessment of potential environmental impacts associated with minor design modifications and the issues of climate change and tribal cultural resources which were not specifically addressed in the previously certified FEIS/ IIR.

Design modifications to the Project, since approval of the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, that are addressed in this Addendum include the following:

The original approved 1990 FEIS/ EIR proposed the same intersection lane configuration as that proposed.

As shown on Exhibit 5, the 1990 FEIS/ EIR considered a 117 - foot ROW width in order to accommodate the additional third through lane, specifically for the southbound travel lane However, no specific take of adjoining properties was acknowledged although the existing ROW is only 100 feet Thus, the Project changes clarify that in order to accommodate a third -through lane, the Project requires to widen the existing street right- of- way ( ROW) width of 100 feet to 111 feet, with the street section width from 84 feet to 95 feet, and the partial acquisition of three properties.

Although the proposed lane configuration was analyzed in the 1990 FE IR, necessary partial ROW acquisition to accommodate this configuration was not considered. Proposed ROW acquisition would be required on the west side of Bristol Street, north of the intersection of Bristol Street and Memory Lane Refer to Section 1.4.2, Proposed Property Acainsition, for a detailed description and mapping of these new areas of acquisition. These Assessor Parcel Numbers ( APNs) include 002- 261- 06, - 29, and - 30. Areas of proposed ROW acquisition consists of vacant land, ornamental landscaping, and areas of paved driveway; no modification/ demolition of habitable structures would be required as part of these new partial acquisitions to accommodate the Project The Project would also accommodate a bike lane and relocate the existing perimeter fencing along Bristol Street and may include an extension of the existing storm water pipeline system ( located on the eastern side of Bristol Street) through a new lateral connection and new catch basin at the Project site.

Additionally, the topics of greenhouse gas ( GHG) emissions and tribal cultural resources were not specifically identified in the previously approved 1990 FEIS/EIR as these topics were not a subject matter that required evaluation pursuant to CEQA at that time As such, this Addendum analyzes the effects of GHG emissions associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project, as well as the Project' s potential to affect tribal cultural resources.

This Addendum to the previously certified 1990 FE IIR has been prepared because Project -related modifications to the Bristol Street alignment do not trigger the need for further environmental analysis in a Subsequent or Supplemental FIR under the requirements CEQA ( refer to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163, respectively).

1. 1 PURPOSE OF AN ADDENDUM
Under CEQA, when an FIR has been certified for a project, no Subsequent EIR may be required for that project unless the lead agency deternines, based upon substantial evidence, that one or more specked circumstances has occured. Only if one or more of the following circumstances arises is a Subsequent EIR required, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162:

FinalI December2017 1- 1 Introduction

City Council
14 –
31 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements - ProjectNo. 17-6883

1. Substantial charges are proposed in the project which will require major revision of theprevious EIR due to the involvement ofrewsignifical environmental effects or asubstontial increase in the severity ofpreviously identifiedsigniticant effects;

2. Substantial charges occur with respect to the circumstances uruler which the project is unrkrtaken which will require major revision of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new sigruficmrt environmental increase in the severity ofpreviously identified significant effects, or

3. New information ofsubstantial importance, which was not knamn and could at have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence of the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of thefollowing:

A) The project will have one or more signal effects not discussed in the previous SIR; B) Signifeaht effects previously exatu ed will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR,
C) Afifigabon measures or alternatives previously fourd not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce ore or more significant effects ofthe project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alterative; or D) Magadan measures or alternatives which are consirkrably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce ors or more sighificat effects on the environ- ment, but the project proponents akctine to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

CEQA Guiktires Section 15162[ x])
A Supplement to an FIR ( or Supplemental EIR), which is naurower in scope than a Subsequent EIR, may be prepared if any of the above criteria apply, but ` only minor changes or additions would be necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation" ( CEQA Guidelines Section 15163[a][ 2]). In the absence of the need to prepare either a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR, an Addendum may be prepared. More specifically, CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 states:
a) The lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none ofte conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation ofa subsequent EIR have occurred
b) An addendum to an adopted negative akclaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or aldttions are necessary or none of the conditions alescribed in Section 15162 catling for the preparation ofa subsequent EIR or negative a i claration have occurred. c) An addendum reed at be circulated for public review but can be inclnakd in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative ai claration.
d) The dectsion- making body shall consider the adaknaLm with the final EIR or adopted negative akclaration prior to making a akcision on the project
e) A briefexplaralion of the ai cision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be incluakd in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency' sfindings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial eviaknce.

This Addendum to the previously certified FEIS/ EIR for the approved Bristol Street Widening Project has been prepared because the evaluation of the proposed modifications does notresult in any of the circumstances requiring a Subsequent or Supplemental EIS/ EIR. Although the proposed modifications would result in development that differs from that in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, those modifications do not trigger the need for preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR under the criteria listed in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163, respectively. Section 22_0 Environmental Checklist and Section 3.0, Environmental Consequences, of this Addendum demonstrate that no substantial changes would result from the proposed Project modifications nor have the existing conditions in the FinalI December2017 1- 2 Introduction

City Council
14 –
32 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 Project vicinity substantially changes such that major revisions to the previously certified 1990 FEIS/ IIR would be required. The Project would not result in a new significant environmental effect or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Specifically, the proposed modifications, as compared to the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, do not result in new or substantially greater significant impacts because the scale and nature of the proposed modifications are sufficiently similar to that analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR such that the impacts of the proposed modifications are within the levels and types of environmental impacts disclosed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR- In addition, no substantial changes in circumstances under Section 15162( a)( 2) have occurred since the certification of the 1990 FEIS/ EIR for the approved Bristol Street Widening Project that would result in new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of significant impacts previously identified, since the background environmental conditions have not significantly changed since that time The City of Santa Ana has received no information indicating there has been a substantial change in any circumstances that would result in a new or substantially greater significant impact
Furthermore, no new information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time of the 1990 FE IIR preparation, has been revealed that shows new or substantially greater significant impacts would result see CEQA Guidelines Section 15162[ a][ 3]). In addition, there are no new or different mitigation measures or altematives that would substantially reduce one or more significant impacts of the approved Bristol Street Widening Project but that are not adopted. The proposed modifications do not identify or require adoption of any further mitigation measures or altematives beyond those provided in the certified 1990 FE IIR for the approved Bristol Street Widening Project, since additional mitigation measures are either not necessary or not feasible, and the altematives analyzed in the 1990 FE IR represent a reasonable range as required pursuant to CEQA ( see CEQA Guidelines Section 15162[ a][ 3]).

This Addendum relies on the certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR and the related administrative record, in addition to the additional documentation included to support the Addendum. The Addendum is to be included or attached to the 1990 FEIS/ FIR and is not to be considered as an independent or separate document As this Addendum does not identify new or substantially greater significant impacts, circulation for public review and comment is not necessary pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(c). However, the City will provide a 30 -day public notice for Public Hearing at which time the City Council will consider and adopt or reject this Addendum ( refer to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164[d]). The findings of the City Council in its resolution of adoption of this Addendum, if adopted, will reflect this Addendum, which provides the basis and substantial evidence for the decision not to prepare a Subsequent or Supplemental FIR ( refer to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164[ e]).

1. 2 PROJECT LOCATION
The proposed Project includes the intersection of Bristol Street and Memory Lane in the City of Santa Ana ( City).

The City, located within the County of Orange, is surounded by the cities of Tustin, Orange, Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley, and Garden Grove The Project site is located approximately 0.73 mile west of Interstate 5 ( I- 5) and approximately 0.25 mile south of State Route 22 ( SR -22); refer to Exhibit 1 Regional Vicinity. and Exhibit 2tete Ficin .

The Project area and surrounding vicinity are located within an urbanized area of the City. Existing land uses near the Project site consist of multi- and single- family residential uses, commercial uses, and vacant land. These surrounding land uses are further described as follows:

North: Bristol Street continues north of the Project site Commercial uses ( a small strip -mall with neighborhood serving retail uses are located to the northwest and Floral Park Promenade is located to the northeast). These properties are designated by the General Plan as Low Density Residential ( LR - 7) and General Commercial ( GC), respectively, and both properties are zoned by the Municipal Code as Community Commercial ( Cl).

FinalI December2017 1- 3 Introduction

City Council
14 –
33 2/17/2026

LOS ANGELES
COUNTY
La Brea
Habra

IMPERIAL HM
Yorba
SealBeach
HuntingtonBeach
Project Site

S A N B E R N A R D I N O
COUNTY
A
F
o
Fq N
0 not to scale
INTERNATIONAL 1 07/2/ 17JN161391MAS
San LL
Clemente
J

S A N D I E G O
COUNTY
Project Site

BRISTOL STREET AND MEMORY LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Regional Vicinity
Exhibit 1
Anaheim 111)
HIIIS
Anaheim o RIVERSIDE
VillaPark s
COUNTY

KATELLA AVE
Orange
2 ceaarmw AVE
Garden°- Grove ® ° Tustin e` °
sgrongao

O R A N G E

C O U N T Y
m
SantaAna oy
IEoimoEa AVE
qGN g 1
Irvines,t, a
Costa m °° Lake
Mesa Forest
D 95ry. QOIryNG, O
RRlpo6
Newport d) A Mission A
Beach Viejo 19
LagunaNiguel
A
F
o
FqN
0 not to scale
INTERNATIONAL1 07/2/ 17 JN161391MAS
San LL
Clemente
J

S A N D I E G O
COUNTY
Project Site

BRISTOL STREETAND MEMORYLANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
Regional Vicinity
Exhibit1

City Council
14 –
34 2/17/2026

iL Aa

ORANGE ROAD

CORRIGAN ' AVENUE
41 e " I i 1 •
r .•
ll ,
a)
Lu
A,
Q ti W F`
4 rI ; 4m, IF
t-
EE
4 oje _ r c
1 P t
Site
Ifi •. '_
IAlk, . 1
T.. ,
mai+..
i _
JI bh +.. A'' 1' 1 `.. ay -,• E R.. - t

E O RY LM M ANE
I

MARCELLALANE,
s
i r s
a -
v P"
e°
i r; W PARK LANE — .- b
r i1 P
E[ E[
Ilkilul •. . • - 1 !/ 44
At_
m ' •
i
417- IL
Michael Baker

City Council
14 –
35 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 East. Memory Lane continues east of the Project site Commercial uses (Floral Park Promenade located to the east and northeast and a Shell gasoline service station located to the east and southeast) are present These properties are all designated GC and zoned Cl. Further southeast of Shell, single- family residential uses (designated LR -7 and zoned Single -Family Residence [R1]) arepresent South: Bristol Street continues south of the Project site Commercial uses ( die Shell gasoline service station located to the south and southeast and a strip -mall with neighborhood serving retail uses located to the south and southwest) are present All of these properties are designated GC and zoned Cl. Further southeast of Shell, Casa de Santiago single-family residential uses ( designated LR -7 and zoned RD are present
West Memory Lane continues west of the Project site Vacant land ( designated GC and zoned Cl) is situated to the west of the Project site and further west is the Portofino Apartments ( designated LR - 7 and zoned Specific Development [ SD27]). Islander Apaurnents ( designated LR -7 and zoned CD are situated to the west and northwest of the Project site
As shown on Exhibit 3, Exi tine Land Uses (1990 FEISIEIR), these land uses have not substantially changed since preparation of the 1990 FEIS/ EIR. It is acknowledged that the 1990 FEIS/ EIR did not include land uses north of Memory Lane in the applicable figures. In order to provide information on land uses north of Memory Lane, Exhibit 3 also identifies these curent land uses. These curent land uses have not substantially changed since the 1990 FEIS/ IIR, as the 1990 FEIS/EIR considered the surounding land uses to include a mix of commercial and residential development

1. 3 PROJECT BACKGROUND

1. 3. 1 APPROVED 1990 FINAL EIR/ EIS
The City of Santa Ana General Plan designates Bristol Street asa Major Arterial Highway traveling in a north -south direction. As a result of significant growth and traffic congestion on Bristol Street, the City of Santa Ana, in the late 1980s, proposed to widen Bristol Street from a four - lane roadway to a six - lane arterial in accordance with adopted County of Orange and City of Santa Ana standards for a Major Arterial Highway. A joint EIS/ EIR was prepared and approved by the City of Santa Ana and the California Department of Transportation ( Caltrans) for the widening of Bristol Street in 1990. The 1990 Bristol Street Widening Project entailed a 3.9 -mile segment of Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane The Project site is situated within the northem- most portion of Bristol Street, previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR as the segment from Seventeenth Street to Memory Lane However, due to significant costs associated with construction and availability of funding the Bristol Street Widening Project was divided into multiple segments and phases, compared to that analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR:

Phase 1, from McFadden Avenue to Pine Street;
Phase II, from 3`tl Street to Civic Center;
Phase IIIA, from Civic Center to Washington Avenue;
Phase 11113, from Washington Avenue to 17a' Street; and Phase IV, from Warner Avenue to St Andrew Place
The Bristol Street Widening segments operate independently; operation of one segment is not dependent on another.

It is acknowledged that prior to dividing the Bristol Street Widening Project for funding purposes, construction of some sections was completed and was not included in the phasing described above, including the following:

St Andrew Place to McFadden Avenue;
Elm Street to Memory Lane; and
Pine Street to 3`6Street
The segment between 17a' Street and Elm Street is not funded; therefore, no phasing has been identified.

FinalI December2017 1- 6 Introduction

City Council
14 –
36 2/17/2026

zw
1 J
l1L1
s
L
GNEEN6NIEN SfNEEi CINOF S4Ni ANA
JZ NiIESAGd:: :y Iv;

BRISTOL STREET
10 H. IH
F
LEGEND
Note: Shows current land use as of2017.
z

BRISTOL
STREETgigi8jilo
0 SHIRR

BRISTOL STREET
0 SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENTIAL

MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ti= ti= fi COMMERCIAL

FM GAS STATION
Source: Willdan Associates

INTERNATIONAL
I0
not to scale
11/ 1317 JN 161391 MAS

BRISTOL STREET AND MEMORY LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Existing LandUse (1990FEIS/EIR)
Exhibit 3
ImfI J

GREENBRIER STREET
L Uzi l

BRISTOL STREET
0 SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENTIAL

MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ti= ti= fi COMMERCIAL

FM GASSTATION
Source: Willdan Associates

INTERNATIONAL
I 0
not to scale
11/ 1317 JN 161391 MAS

BRISTOL STREETAND MEMORYLANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
ExistingLandUse (1990FEIS/EIR)
Exhibit3

City Council
14 –
37 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements - ProjectNo. 17-6883 The 1990 FEIS/ EIR ( SCH No. 87071509) was approved on November 19, 1990. The 1990 FEIS/ EIR and associated technical studies, incorporated herein by reference, documented the environmental impacts of widening Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane in the City of Santa Ana. As stated in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, the purpose and goals of the Bristol Street Widening Project were to:

1. Provide sufficient roadway capacity to accommodate current and future traffic demand.

2. Improve the performance and safety of the roadway for the benefit of the motoring public.

3. To reduce current and projected future delays experienced at major intersections and to design intersections to function at acceptable Levels of Service ( LOS).

4. To design the roadway in manner conducive to the provision of public transportation, namely bus service provided by the Orange County Transit District ( OCTD).

1. 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1. 4. 1 PROPOSED INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
The City proposes the widening of Bristol Street, just north of Memory Lane, to accommodate a third southbound through lane at the intersection; refer to Exhibit 4, Proposed Zorn Geometrics. This additional through lane would result in the relocation of the existing dedicated right -tum lane slightly west The proposed widening would involve the partial acquisition of three parcels in order to accommodate the new total ROW widths ( proposed to expand from 100 feet to 111 feet). The proposed intersection improvements would require relocation of curb/ gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, and both public and private utilities ( including the existing traffic signal). Existing perimeter fencing along Bristol Street would also be relocated and replaced in-kind with a similar aesthetic Treatment. Due to the existing building setback requirements, the Project would require approval from the City Manager for landscape strip Exceptions for building setbacks per Municipal Code Section 41-781.

The Project proposes a 12 -month construction period ( anticipated to be completed by December 2019). At least one lane in each direction of travel would remain open and existing driveway access along Bristol Street and Memory Lane would be retained at all times. The maximum excavation depth would be two feet for roadway excavation, and approximately 10 feet or less for utility footings/ excavation. Approximately 30 cubic yards of cut material is anticipated to be exported. Other improvements may include a new stormwater catch basin and a new lateral connection to the existing stormwater pipeline in Bristol Street

1. 4. 2 PROPOSED PROPERTY ACQUISITION
As listed in Table 1 Proposed Property Acquisition, a total of three Assessor' s Parcel Numbers ( APNs) ( 002- 261- 06, -29, and -30) would be partially acquired as a result of the proposed intersection improvements; refer to Exhibit

4. All proposed areas of acquisition include vacant portions of commercial and multi - family residential properties.

Thesevacant areas consist of bare soils, paving/ asphalt, or omamental landscaping. The acquisitions would comply with policies pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as implemented by the City of Santa Ana.

Table 1
Proposed Property Acquisition
FinalI December2017 1- 8 Introduction
Permanent Temporary
APN Address ExistingLandUse Acquisition Type Acquisition Construction
squarefeet)
Easement square feet)
OD2261 06 2702 N. Bristol Street Vacant Commercial Pallial and TOE 1,586 723 OD2261-291313W. MemoryLaneOrnamentalLandscapingandDrivewayPallial and TOE 1,265 575 Associated with the PoilofinoA ailments
00226130 2724N. BristolStreet OrnamentalLandscapingandDriveway Pallial and TOE 334 457 Associated with thelslanderreailments
Notes: TCE- TemporaryConstrmtion Easement
FinalI December2017 1- 8 Introduction

City Council
14 –
38 2/17/2026

Z
APN: 002- 261- 06
J 2702 N. BRISTOL ST
LEGEND
Impacted Properties
0 Proposed TemporaryConstructionEasement
0 ProposedSidewalk
0 ProposedStreetPavement
Source: Santa Ana Public Works Agency

INTERNATIONAL
11/ 16/ 17 JN 161391 MAS
in I
PROP. R/ W
m
APN: 002- 261- 29
1313 W. MEMORY LN.
o QIBIKE LANE
C>
O—
o L 150' POCKET
N
31111111

4. - J*
m

NOT TO SCALE
APN: 002- 261- 30
2724 N. BRISTOL ST.

EX. R/ W
N

RAISED MEDIAN
N
O
v

BRISTOL ST IS
a . MA

BRISTOL STREET AND MEMORY LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Proposed Lane Geometrics
Exhibit 4

City Council
14 –
39 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883

1. 4. 3 CHANGES AS COMPARED TO THE APPROVED PROJECT
It should be noted that Project phasing has been revised from the original phases identified in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

As discussed in Section 1.3.1 Approved 1990 Final FIR/ FIS. construction phasing of the entire Bristol Street Widening Project has been further subdivided asfollows:

SL Andrew Place to McFadden Avenue( Constructed in 2002); Elm Street to Memory Lane ( Constructed in 2003);
Pine Street to 3`aStreet ( Constructed in 2009);
Phase I: McFadden Avenue to Pine Street ( Constructed in 20111); Phase II: 3`6 Street to Civic Center Drive ( Constructed in 2014); PhaseIIIA: Civic Center Drive to Washington Avenue;
Phase 11113: Washington Avenue to 17a Street hinder construction); Phase IV Warner Avenue to St Andrew Place; and
Phase V: 17v' Street to Elm Street
The proposed intersection improvements ( proposed Project addressed herein) differs from the original configuration of the 1990 FEIS/ IIR, as follows:

As shown on Exhibit 4 and Exhibit 5 Bristol S/reetl1kmory Lane Intersection Confleurrdion ( 1990 FEISIEIR), the original approved 1990 FEIS/ EIR proposed the same intersection lane configuration as that proposed. As shown on Exhibit 5, the 1990 FEIS/ EIR considered a 117 - foot ROW width in order to accommodate the additional third through lane, specifically for the southbound travel lane However, no specific take of adjoining properties was acknowledged although the existing ROW is only 100 feet Thus, the Project changes clarify that in order to accommodate a third -through lane, the Project requires to widen the existing street ROW width of 100 feet to 111 feet, with the street section width from 84 feet to 95 feet, and the partial acquisition of three properties.

Although the proposed lane configuration was analyzed in the 1990 FE IR, necessary partial ROW acquisition to accommodate this configuration was not considered. Proposed ROW acquisition would be required on the west side of Bristol Street, north of the intersection of Bristol Street and Memory Lane. As depicted on Exhibit 5 Nese Assessor Parcel Numbers ( APNs) include 002- 261- 06, - 29, and - 30. Areas of proposed ROW acquisition consist of vacant land, omamental landscaping and areas of paved driveway; no modification/ demolition of habitable structures would be required as part of these new partial acquisitions to accommodate the Project The Project would also accommodate a bike lane and relocate the existing perimeter fencing along Bristol Street and may include an extension of the existing stomp water pipeline system ( located on the eastem side of Bristol Street) through a new lateral connection and new catch basin at the Project site
An assessment of construction and Project - related GHG emissions and potential impacts to tribal cultural resources was also not addressed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, and as a result is addressed in this Addendum.

1. 4. 4 CONSTRUCTION TIMEFRAME
Construction activities associated with the proposed Project would occur following acquisition of the required parcels. The Project proposes a 12 -month construction period ( anticipated to be completed by December 2019).

However, it is acknowledged that the Project could be constructed in multiple phases, depending on funding. 1 Phasenumberswere assignedto theBristol StreetWideningProjectsubsequentto cancelationof the CenterLine Light Rail Transit Project and associatedreallocation of funding from that canceled project to the Bristol Street Widening Project.

FinalI December2017 1- 10 Introduction

City Council
14 –
40 2/17/2026

Iii
I
Ivi
i L.,.
13 1T 1i 1T 10 9' 12 ti 13
r
J
Q
m SZ '
i
Y
T T
13' i1 1T 10' 10' 1T 1}T 1}3'
94'
rO'
I
Bristol Street
Source: Willdan Associates
0 not to scale
I NTE R N A T 10 NAL I10/ 17/ 17 JN 161391 HAS

BRISTOL STREET AND MEMORY LANE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Bristol Street/ Memory Lane
Intersection Configuration
1990 FEIS/ EIR)
Exhibit 5

City Council
14 –
41 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Imorovements — Proiect No. 17-6883

1. 5 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS
Landscape strip Exceptions for building setbacks must be approved by the City Manager per Municipal Code Section 41-781, and this Addendum must be adoptedby the City of SantaAna City Council as to its adequacyin complying with the requirements of CEQA and the previously approved 1990 FEIS/EIR. The City Council will consider the information contained in the Addendum and the 1990 FEIS/EIR in making a decision to approve or deny the proposedProject.

1. 6 CLARIFICATIONS TO THE ADDENDUM UPON

CERTIFICATION
As documented throughout Section 3. 0, Environmental Consequences, the project does not involve substantial changes, such that major revisions to the previously approved 1990 FEIS/EIR are required. Substantial changes with respect to circumstances have not resulted. No new information of substantial importance has occurred. The project would not result in new or more significant impacts than what was previously considered. Previously identified significant impacts would not be substantially increased as a result of the project. No new mitigation measureswould be required. Thus, the City of SantaAna, asthe Lead Agency, has determined that Project -related modifications to the Bristol Street alignment do not trigger the need for further environmental analysis in a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR under the requirements CEQA ( CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163, respectively).

As this Addendum doesnot identify new or substantially greater significant impacts, a 30 -day circulation for public review and comment is not necessary pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(c) and was not conducted.

However, it is acknowledged that the City provided a 10 -day public notice for Public Hearing, at which time the City Council considered the Addendum for certification. One public comment letter regarding the project was submitted at the Public Hearing ( conductedon December5, 2017) by Mr. Mark Rosen. The comment letter did not specifically include any comments pertaining to the content or adequacy of the Addendum. The Addendum was certified on December 5, 2017 (pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164[ d]). The findings of the City Council in its resolution of adoption of this Addendum reflect this Addendum, which provides the basis and substantial evidence for the decision not to prepare a Subsequent or Supplemental FIR ( refer to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164[ e]), and, thus, no further action is required.

On December5, 2017, City Council authorized City Manager to approve an exception to the landscapestrip setback per Municipal Code Section 41- 781. The approved landscape exception is shown in Exhibit 6 Memorandum.

FinalI December2017 1- 12 Introduction

City Council
14 –
42 2/17/2026

MEMORANDUM
Raul Godinez II, City Manager
To: City Manager Office Date:

Fred Mousavipour, Executive Directo
From: Public Works Agency kA -
Subject:

December 5, 2017
PROJECT NO. 17- 6883
Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Widening— Requirement of Landscape Strip Project background:

Bristol Streetis classified as a north -south Major Arterial per the City's General PlanCirculation Element (GPCE) andthe County of Orange's Master Plan of Arterial Highway (MPAH). Currently, the segmentsto the south and north of the Bristol Street/Memory Lane intersection have 3 lanes in each direction except for the southbound lanesjust north of Memory Lane where is has only 2 southbound lanes.

The Bristol Street/Memory Lane intersection project is proposed to accommodate a third southbound through lanejust north of Memory Lane (Exhibit A). This additional through lane would result in the relocation of the existing dedicatedright -turn lane slightly west. The proposedwidening would involve the partial acquisition of three parcels in order to accommodate the new total ROW widths from 100 feet to 111 feet. As a result of the widening, the back of new sidewalk is measuredapproximately 11 feet from the patio fenceat 1313W. Memory Lane and 12feet to 14feet from the entrancestructureat 2724 N. Bristol Street ( Exhibit B & Q.

According to Municipal Code Section 41-781, Requirement of landscape strip as part of street widening, the following applies:
a) Whenevercity acquiresa portion of parcel alongstreetfrontagefor a streetwidening or other public works project, the city shall also acquireaninterestin the realproperty sufficient to allow a landscape -only strip behind the sidewalkthat is of a width that conformsto the thencurrentcity standard for the parcel.
b) The city manager may authorize exceptions to this section on a case-by-casebasis, in consultation with the city council.

The current city standardrequiresa landscapesetbackof 15feet. To avoid full acquisitionsof 1313W.

Memory Lane and 2724 N. Bristol Street, staff is requestingthe City Managerauthorizethis exception to landscape setback requirement
Enclosure: Exhibit A Approved:

Exhibit B
Exhibit C
L ' 1
Raul Godinez Date:

City Manager
er, A uwgi,tw15x1 den 17.4. 1x-- Exhibit6

City Council
14 –
43 2/17/2026

4 zo
0 z co
3 LL.

M>-
r
m
Li -
0 I I 1 . 9 . 01 01 ' 01 • 8 ' 01 ' 01 01 , Zi 8
kk
N- 1 AHON
o . 11 . 01 : 01 " Ol q I, ol 101 101 21 IR
W
Z
2WW
z
0 WW
0 65
Er
m

City Council
14 –
44 2/17/2026

City Council
14 –
45 2/17/2026

I
A
q91
r

City Council
14 –
46 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883

2. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST

2. 1 BACKGROUND

1. Project Title: BristolStreetand MemoryLane Intersection ImprovementsProject (ProjectNo. 17-6883)

2. LeadAgency Nameand Address:

City of SantaAna
20 Civic Center Plaza, M- 36
Santa Ana, CA 92702

3. Contact Person and Phone Num ber:

Kenny Nguyen, P.E.

Senior Ciml Engineer
714. 647. 5632

4. Project Location: The intersection ofBristol Streetand MemoryLane in the Cityof Santa Ana. The Projectsite is locatedapproximately0. 73mile west of Interstate5 (1-5) and approximately0.25 mile south of State Route 22 (SR - 22).

5. Project Sponsor' s Nam a and Address:

City of SantaAna
20 Civic Center Plaza, M- 36
Santa Ana, CA 92702

6. General Plan Designation: General Commercial (GC) and Low DensityResidential (LR -7)

7. Zoning: Community Commercial (Cl) andSpecific Development(SD27)

8. Description of the Project: The City proposes the widening of Bristol Street just north of Memory Lane, to accommodate a third southbound through lane at the intersection. This additional through lane would result in the relocation of the existing dedicatedright -turn lane slightlywest The proposedWideningwould involve the partial acquisition of three parcels in order to accommodate the new total ROW widths ( proposed to expand from 100 feet to 111 feet). The proposed intersectionimprovementswould require relocationof curb/gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, andboth public and privateutilities ( includingthe existing traffic signal). Due to the existing building setback requirements, the Projectwould requireapprovalfrom the City Managerfor landscapestrip Exceptionsfor building setbacksper Municipal CodeSection 41- 781. The original approved1990 FEIS/EIR proposed the same intersection lanes Width and configuration as that proposed. The 1990 FEIS/ EIR considered a 117 -foot ROW Width in orderto accommodatethe additionalthird through lane, specificallyfor the southbound travellane. However, no specific take of adjoining properties was acknowledgedalthough the existing ROW is only 100 feet. Thus, the Project changesclarify that in order to accommodatea third -through lane and bike lane, the Project requires to widen the existing streetROWwidth of 100feet to 111feet, with the streetsectionWidthfrom 84 feetto 95 feet, and the partial acquisition of three properties.

9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: Surroundinglanduses consistof commercialand multi- andsingle-family residential uses; referto Section 1. 2, Protect Location.

10. agreement).

City of SantaAna
FinalI December2017 2- 1 Environmental Checklist

City Council
14 –
47 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 This page intentionally left blank.

FinalI December2017 2- 2 Environmental Checklist

City Council
14 –
48 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883

3. 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES
This section describes the effects of the proposed Project as compared to those identified in the previously approved 1990 FEIS/ EIR document, and to existing conditions and any changes in regulatory setting since the previously approved 1990 FEIS/ EIR. Furthermore, this section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Project The issue areas evaluated in this document include the following pursuant to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, and have been modified to evaluate the proposed Project changes for which an FEIS/ EIR has been previously approved ( in 1990) to assist in the determination of the need for a supplemental EIS/ EIR or an Addendum.

The modified Initial Study checklist, comparing the effects of the Project modifications as compared to those analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, is found in Appendix A, Modifiedlnifial & udv Checklist Aesthetics
Agricultural and Forestry Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology and Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Hydrology/ Water Quality
Land Use
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population and Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation/ fraffrc
Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities/ Service Systems
Mandatory Findings of Significance
A summary of impacts of the previously approved Bristol Street Widening Project and the mitigation measures imposed is provided along with an analysis of the potential impacts resulting from the proposed Project and whether those impacts substantially exceeds those discussed in the previously approved 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

3. 1 AESTHETICS
This section coresponds with the following 1990 FEIS/ EIR, Section IV, Emironmental Consequences and Mfigation Measures, subsections:

Subsection A, Landform Aloddiication;
Subsection G, Urban Landscaping;
Subsection J, Light and Glare; and
Subsection K, Aesthetic Considerations.

Would the project:
a) Have ¢ substantial adverse effect on ¢ scenic vista? The proposed Project would not result in any significant modifications or changes from the previously approved 1990 FEIS/ EIR. The Project is located within ahighly developed urban area of the City of Santa Ana. Existing land use near the Project site consists of multi- and single-family residential uses, commercial uses, and vacant land. No scenic vistas are located within the Project area. No impact to scenic vistas would result from the proposed Project Certified 1990 FRIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

FinalI December2017 3- 1 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
49 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but nat limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and hdstorlc buildings radius a state scenic highway?
State Route 91 is located approximately 10 miles north- east of the Project site The Project would not be visible from SR - 91. No impacts would occur in this regard.

Certified 1990 FRIS/ RIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quaiity ofthe she audits surroundings? The proposed Project is located in a highly -urbanized area of the City of SantaAna. The Project would widen the existing roadway ROW from 100 feet to 111 feet, resulting in additional property take for the purposes of roadway use These changes in character would be similar to those analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR. Per the 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures G- 1 and G-2, the Project would be compatible with the Bristol Street Widening Project landscaping theme and a Xeriscape ( climate appropriate landscaping) program would be considered. Existing perimeter fencing along Bristol Street would be relocated and replaced in- kind with a similar aesthetic treatment These changes in character/quality would be nominal, compared to that previously considered. As such, the proposed Project would not result in substantially greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FRIS/ RIR Mitigation Measures:

G- 1 A consistent theme will be developed and implemented for the landscaping within the public right- of- way for Bristol Street as a part of the street widening project G- 2 Consideration will be given to the implementation of a Xeriscape landscaping program. Such a program would involve the use of low -maintenance, drought - tolerant plantmaterials, thereby reducing long -tern costs for maintenance and water consumption.

Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Light and glare are curentiy generated from various sources within the Project area ( e.g., commercial and retail businesses, signage, street lighting and parking lot lighting). The proposed Project does not involve the construction of any habitable structures. Relocation of the street lighting fixtures would occur. Therefore, no new sources of light orglare would resultwith implementation of the proposed Project The proposed Project would not generate additional daytime or nighttime illumination beyond that curentiy experienced within the area. The relocation of the traffic signal pole would be required to meet the Citywide Design Guidelines and the 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measure J- 1 pertaining to cut- off shielding techniques. With compliance with the 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation, the proposed Project would notresult in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FIIS/ IIR.

Certified 1990 FRIS/ RIR Mitigation Measures:

J- 1 Consideration will be given to the selection of new street fixtures which have cut- off shields to minimize light and glare nuisances for residential properties adjoining Bristol Street Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. i California Department of Transportation, California Scenic Highway Mapping S},,tem, http://www. dot.ca.gov/ hq/LandAwh/ 16 livability/ scenic highways/ index. htm, accessedAugust 30, 2017.

FinalI December2017 3- 2 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
50 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883

3. 2 AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTRY RESOURCES
The previously approved 1990 FEIS/ EIR did not include evaluation for agricultural resources, as no agricultural resources are located within the area of analysis.

In determindng nhether impacts to agricultural resources are sigurwant environmental effects, Lead agencies may refer to the CatiforniaAgricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model ( 1997) prepared by the California Dept of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessrg impacts on agriculture andfarmland In determining whether impacts to fares resources, including timberland are significant environmental effects, Lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state' s inventory afforest land inchuding the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project,' andfores carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adapted by the California Air Resouvees Board Wouldtheproject:
a) Convert Prime Farmland Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance ( Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the CatiforndaResouveesAgemy, to non- agricultural use?
The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program classifies the Project site as Urban and Built- up land. No Prime, Unique, or Farmland of Statewide Importance is located in the vicinity of the Project site No impacts would result from the proposed Project The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

A) Conflict walk exromg, zoaingfor agizeultaal use, or a Wu7liamsonAct contract? The Project site is located within a highly -urbanized areain the City of Santa Ana. Lands within the Project area are designated General Commercial and Low Density Residential as identified in the City of Santa Ana' s General Plan.

The zoning designation of properties within the Project area are Community Commercial and Specific Development SD27). No agricultural uses exist on site or in the vicinity, and the Project would not conflict with a Williamson Act contract as none exist in the Project area. The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning, of fares land ( as defined in Public Resonances Cade section 12220( g)), timberland ( as defined by Public Resources Cade section 4526), or 6mberlmudzonea7YmberlaudProductum ( as defineaby Government Cade section 51104( g))? The Project site is located within a highly -urbanized area in the City of Santa Ana. The zoning designation of properties within the Project area are Community Commercial and Specific Development ( SD27). No forest land or timberland production exist on site or in the vicinity, and the Project would not conflict zoning pertaining to these resources. The proposed Projectwould not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 3 Califomia DepartmentofConservation, Orange CountyImportant Farmland 2014, ftp://ftp.conerv.ca.gov/p. b/dlhp/ 1rvMP/ pd1/ 2014/ ora14. pdf, accessed August 17, 2017.

FinalI December2017 3- 3 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
51 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 14 Result in the loss offorea land or conversion afforest 1aulto non - forest use? Refer to Response 3. 2( c). Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which. due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non- Wriculhnnl use or conversion afforest land to non -forest use?
Refer to Responses 3. 2 ( a) through 3. 2(c). Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed, in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 3 AIR QUALITY
This section coresponds with 1990 FEIS/ EIR Section IV, Enmironmental Consequences and Abligation Aleasures, Subsection AAir Quality, and Subsection V, Construction Impacts ofthe previously approved.

Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air qualdy management or air pollution control district maybe relied upon to make the following determinatom. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implements ion ofthe applicable air quality plan? The proposed Project is consistent with the applicable plans, ordinances and policies establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system as described in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR. According to the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, the widening of Bristol Street was designated in the Orange County Master Plan, and was recommended in the Bristol Street Corridor Study — Final Report, prepared by Motile, Grover & Associates, dated 1983° Itwas also recommended in the Arterial Highway Element — SamaAmElement— SandAna Transportation Corridor State H Alternative Analysis, prepared by Parsons, Brinekedhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc., dated 1983.

The proposed widening is also consisterhtwith the recommendation found in the Intercity Liaison Commitee — Five - Year Ramportation Study Update to 1990, prepared by Basmaciyan- Damell, Inc., dated 19855 Furthermore, the proposed Project would improve traffic operations through the Project coridor. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

The Bristol Street Widening Project is included in SCAG' s 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy ( RTP/SCS): A Plan for Mobility, Accessibility, Sustainability and a High Quality of Life 2016 RTP) ( RTP ID ORA125).° The Project is also currently listed in SCAG' s financially constrained 2017 Federal Tramportaton Improvement Program ( 2017 FLIP) for fiscal year 2016/ 2017 — 2021/ 2022. The Project entry in the 2017 FTIP identifies the following scope of work: BRISTOL ST ( MEMORY LANE TO 17111 STREET AND 3RD STREET TO ST. ANDREWS PLACE) WIDEN FROM 4 TO 6 LANES; split project ORA150003, ORA150004, ORA150005, ORA150006. 7
4 POWEREngineers, Bristolgreet WideningPhase11D1—Civic CenterDriveto WashingtonAvenueEnvironmental Impact Report Addendum, January 20, 2015.
s Ibid
6 Southam Califontia Association of Governments, 20162040 Regional Transportation Plan/ An.rtainable Commu ities 9rategy ( RTP/ SCS), TranrpoKation STysfemProject List, 2016.

Southan California Association of G vemments, Final 2017 Federal Transportation Improvement Program, 2016.

FinalI December2017 3- 4 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
52 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 The Project' s design concept and scope have not changed significantly from what was analyzed in the RTIP and FTIP. This analysis found that the plan and, therefore the individual projects contained in the plan, are conforming projects and would have air quality impacts consistent with those identified in the SIPS for achieving the NAAQS.

The FHWA determined the RTIP to conform to the SIP.

The proposed widening of Bristol Street, from Memory Lane to 17r Street has been included in the FTIP since 1992. The FTIP gives priority to eligible Transportation Control Measures ( TCMs) identified in the SIP and provides sufficient funds to provide for their implementation. The FHWA determined the FTIP to conform to the SIP on December 16, 2016. No significant impacts would occur. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Furthermore, the South Coast Air Basin ( SCAB) is designated by the state and US Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) as nonattainment for ozone (03), and particulate matter 2.5 microns in diameter or less (PMzs) and attainment/maintenance for carbon monoxide ( CO) and particulate matter 10 microns in diameter or less PM1o. The South Coast Air Quality Management District ( SCAQMD) developed regional emissions thresholds to determine whether or not a project would contribute to air pollutant violations. If a project exceeds the regional air pollutant thresholds, then the project would substantially contribute to air quality violations in the SCAB. In addition, a project would also contribute to air pollutant violations if localized emissions result in an exceedance of the ambient air quality standards ( AAQS).

The proposed Project would be consistent with the Major Arterial designation of the City of Santa Ana General Plan Circulation Element and the County of Orange' s Master Plan of Arterial Highways. Additionally, the Project would improve traffic flow, maintain vehicle capacity, reduce idling and result in a reduction in air pollutant emissions as was previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR. Thus, no new or substantial increase of impacts have been identified and no new mitigation measures are required.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ FIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional new mitigation measures are required. b) violate my air quality standard or contribute substmrtiaIIy to an existing or projected air quaffiy violation?
All proposed areas of acquisition include vacant portions of commercial and multi -family residential properties.

These vacant areas consist of dirt, paving/ asphalt or omamental landscaping. The Project proposes to change the existing street section from a total ROW width of 100 feet to 111 feet, which is a nominal increase over what was previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR. No structure modification/ demolition would be required as part of these new partial acquisitions to accommodate the Project As determined in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, short - tern construction emissions from the Project would be below the SCAQMD' s significance thresholds for all criteria pollutants, including PM10 and PMis, even in the absence of specific dust reduction measures. Construction phasing for the proposed Projectwould be similar to the construction activities and phasing described in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR for the Project Therefore, the construction emissions would be similar to those in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR. It has been determined that construction emissions would not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Thus, impacts are considered less than significant Because emissions were found to be below the SCAQMD' s significance thresholds, Project related construction emissions are not considered by the SCAQMD to result in a significant air quality impact In addition, mitigation measures included in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR would further reduce construction -related air quality impacts.

The proposed Project would improve traffic flow and reduce idling, as the Projectwould add one additional through lane and this configuration was analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR. The modifications to the 1990 FEIS/ EIR would add more ROW to the existing right -tum lane and serve to increase traffic flow through the intersection, but would not increase the overall road capacity, previously considered lane configuration, or air quality impacts disclosed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR The proposed Project would result in the same operational air emissions as that considered in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, which were below SCAQMD thresholds. Thus, no new or substantial increase of impacts have been identified and no new mitigation measures are required.

FinalI December2017 3-5 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
53 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 Certlfled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures
H- 1 SCAQMD Rule 403 will be adhered to, insuring the clean-up of construction -related dirt on approach routes to the site.

H- 2 Adequate watering techniques will be employed to partially mitigate the impact of construction - generated dust particulates.

H- 3 Construction equipment will be properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions.

H- 5 The use of energy efficient lighting along Bristol Street ( low pressure sodium vapor lights) will be considered to reduce emissions at the power plant serving the area.

H- 6 Traffic signals along Bristol Street will continue to be synchronized ( AQMP control measures K2).

H- 7 Construction activities will be halted during Stage One and Stage Two smog alerts.

Mitigation Measures: No additional new mitigation measures are required.

C) Result is a cu mudidively considerable net increase of my criteria pollutant for which the project region is noroNtmmnent under an applicable federal or state mabient air quality standard inchudiwg releasing emissions which exceed quantitative Ihresholdsfor ozone precursors)? The SCAB is designated by the EPA and the State as being nonattainment for 03, PM,,, and PM,,. In accordance with SCAQMD methodology, any project that does not exceed or can be mitigated to less than the daily threshold values does not add significantly to a cumulative impact As mentioned above, the development of the proposed Project demonstrates that construction and operational activities would not result in emissions in excess of SCAQMD' s threshold values. Since the proposed Project would not exceed the SCAQMD' s significance thresholds for construction activities or the operations phase, the SCAQMD does not consider emissions from the Project' s emissions to add significantly to any cumulative impact Furthermore, it should be noted that the proposed Project would improve traffic flow, reduce idling, and encompass the same amount of road capacity for with the existing lane configuration. As such, the Project would continue to result in a beneficial impact Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures H- 1 through H- 3 and H- 5 through H- 7.

Mitigation Measures: No additional new mitigation measures are required. d) Expose sensitive receptors to substmhdal pollutant concentrations? A project could have the potential to expose sensitive receptors to elevated pollutant concentrations if it would cause or contribute substantially to elevated pollutant concentration levels or place the project in an area with elevated pollutant concentrations. An evaluation of air pollutant emissions as it affects local sensitive receptors has been conducted for both the construction and operations phases of the Project As per the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, it was determined that sensitive receptors in the vicinity appeared to experience carbon monoxide levels that exceeded state and federal standards. Additionally, it was found that under future conditions with the Bristol Street Widening Project, sensitive land uses adjacent to the intersections analyzed reduced carbon monoxide levels to less than significant once the sensitive receptors were setback far enough from the intersections. It was also noted that the carbon monoxide concentrations were only analyzed during " worst case" conditions and did not reflect concentrations which were more likely to occur which would be less than significant compared to what was observed. The Project configuration, which was also analyzed as part of the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, would serve to increase traffic flow through the intersection, but would not increase the overall road capacity compared to the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, and would not result in an increase in the pollutant concentrations near sensitive receptors, as previously analyzed the 1990 FEIS/ EIR. In addition, as determined in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, the proposed modifications would increase traffic flow and reduce traffic idling which would decrease vehicle emissions. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

FinalI December2017 3- 6 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
54 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures H- 1 through H- 3 and H- 5 through H- 7.

Mitigation Measures: No additional new mitigation measures are required. e) Create objectionable odorsrffecting asubstmetialmunber ofpeople7 Construction activities associated with the proposed Project may generate detectable odors from heavy- duty construction equipment and exhaust Odors associated with diesel and gasoline fumes are transitory in nature and would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. The impacts from these odors would be short- term, would cease upon Project completion, and are not anticipated to be significant Implementationofthe proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional new mitigation measures are required.

This section cohresponds with the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mdigation Akasures, SubsectionE, SireambedAlodoicotion.

Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect either directly or through habitat modifications; on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulatdons, or by the Caldfornia Depmbnent of Fish and Gane or US Fish and Wddtdfe Service? The Project site is located within a highly -urbanized area within the City of Santa Ana. No sensitive natural habitat or special -status species exist on or in the vicinity of the proposed Project Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any rdpmian habitat or other sensitive natural communhy identified in Local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the CaVornia Deportment of Fish andCnme or US Fish and Wddhfe Service?
Refer to Response 3.4m). No riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities are identified in the Project vicinity. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands us defused by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act linchsding, bad sat limited to, morfshg vernal pool coastal etc) through direct removal filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Refer to Response 3.4m). No federally protected wetlands are identified in the Project area or vicinity. The proposed Project is located within a highly -urbanized area of the City of Santa Ana. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

FinalI December2017 3- 7 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
55 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. aq Interfere substantaIIy wi k the movement of my native resident or migraoryfuh or Wdlafe species or wi k established nave resident or migratory wedhfe corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
As the proposed Project is located within a highly -urbanized area of the City of Santa Ana, the Project would not interfere with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites, astime are located within the Project area. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures are required. e) Confect with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
The proposed Project may result in the removal of existing landscaping including trees. As such, removal or planting of trees is required to comply with the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code, Chapter 33, Article VII, Regulation ofthe Pleading, Mmnferxmce, and Removal of Trees. With compliance with the City' s Municipal Code, the proposed Project would not conflict with the City' s tree ordinance Implementation of the proposed Project would notresult in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable.

Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures arerequired. n Conflict wdh the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Pliny Natural Community ConservatlonPlary or other approvedlocal. regional orstae habitacomervadoaplan? The Project site is not located within a habitat conservation plan. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES
This section corresponds with the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Akasures, Subsection T, Cultural Resources.

Would the project:
a) Cause a substantia adverse change in the signirwavice of a historical resource in defined in 5064. 5?
No structure modification would result with implementation of the Project Furthermore, the proposed Project would only require limited depths of excavations ( maximum depth of 10 feet). Although the majority of excavation is anticipated to occur in non- native fill materials, should unknown potential historical resources be uncovered, implementation of mitigation measure T- 1 in the previously approved 1990 FEIS/ EIR would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

FinalI December2017 3- 8 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
56 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures:

T- 1 If potential archaeological resources are encountered during grading all work will be halted in that particular location until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the recovered materials.

Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures arerequired. b) Cause a substantial adverse charge in the . ngnrcance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 5064. 5?
Due to the limited area of disturbance, within an existing developed and urban area, and limited depth of proposed excavations, the potential to uncover archaeological resources is considered low. The proposed Project would not result in archaeological impacts greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures T- 1.

Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

C) Directly or hulaectlydestroy auniguepaleontological resource or site or unique geologicfeature? As documented in Chapter VI, Resources Element, of the County of Orange General Plan, the Project site is not located in an areaof paleontological sensitivity. Soils occurring in the Project areaare SanEmigdio.s Typically, these deposits are less than 10,000 years old, and not likely to contain important fossils.' No greater impacts to paleontological resources than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ E[ R would resultfrom Project implementation.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures arerequired. d) Disturb any hanan remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? The Project site is located within a highly -urbanized area within the City of Santa Ana. Cathedral Memorial Gardens is located approximately 2 miles north- west of the Project site In the event that human remains are uncovered during grading or excavation, contractors are required to comply with the procedures and requirements set forth in the California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and CPRC Section 2098.98. The County Coroner and, in the event that the remains are Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission would be notified and, in tum, would notify those persons believed to be most likely descended from the deceased for appropriate disposition of the remains. The proposed Project would not result in an impact to human remains greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
This section corresponds with the following 1990 FEIS/ EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences aro! Mfigadon Measures, subsections:

Subsection A, Landform Aloahficadon;
Subsection 13, Seismic Hozards;
8 United StatesDepartmentof Agriculture, WebSoil vey, htips://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoil Suivey. aspx, accessed August 2, 2017.
9 Ibid
FinalI December2017 3- 9 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
57 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 Subsection C, Erosion Impacts; and
Subsection F, Water Qfrality.

Would the project:
a) F_ hose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss i%huy, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fau15 as delineates on the most recent Alguist- priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologht for the area or based on other substantial evidence of akamvufault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special publication 42.

The City of Santa Ana is not included in the Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map10. The Project site is not underlain by an active fault The closest faults are the II Modeno Fault, approximately eight miles to the northeast and the Newport - Inglewood Fault approximately 15 miles to the southwest The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ IIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable.

Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. ii) Strong seismic groundshaking?
The EI Modeno fault is the closest fault to the Project site and is the most likely source of ground shaking impacts".

The Project proposes intersection improvements and would not expose people or structures to adverse ground shaking impact The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FE IIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable.

Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures arerequired. iia Seismic -re Adedgroundfahure, including liquefaction? According to the City' s General Plan, the Project site is identified as having high - medium liquefaction potential.

However, the Project does not propose any new habitable structures. Implementation of 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measure B- 2, to replace surface level structures with structures that have extensive subsurface footings ( such as traffic signals) that reach stable material would reduce any structural impacts from ground failure to less than significant The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FE IIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures:

B- 2 Consideration will be given to installing and replacing surface level structures such as street lights, traffic signals and utility poles, with structures that have extensive subsurface footings that reach stable material.

Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. iv) Landslides?
The proposed Project site is generally flat and does not contain any significant slopes. The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ IIR. 10 City of SantaAna, Cityof&antaA a GeneralPlan, adoptedSeptember1982, asamended. 11 California Geological Survey, Fault Activity Map of California, hfp:// maps.croservafim.ca.gov/cgs/faM App/ index. html, accessed August 3, 2017.

FinalI December2017 3- 10 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
58 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 Certified 1990 FRIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Exposure of barren rock and soil surfaces during coustmction would result in soil erosion. However, considering the slight gradient, the anticipated erosion impact would be nominal. The proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR.

Certified 1990 FRIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures:

C- 2 Straw or other suitable materials will be placed over uncovered soils, as needed, during street construction activities. This would reduce the amount of erosion.

Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable us a result of the project and potentially result in on- or off- site IandvHde, lateral sprealmg, subsidence, Hguefactum or collapse?
The 1990 FEIS/ EIR indicated t hatthere are no instances of undisturbed, natural soils. TheProject site located in an area identified ashaving high to medium subsidence for liquefaction. However, the Project area is fully developed with urban uses within the City of Santa Ana and the proposed Project would be constructed in accordance with the standards of the Uniform Building Code ( UBC). Implementation of 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measure B- 2, to replace surface level structures with stmcMres that have extensive subsurface footings that reach stable material would reduce any structural impacts from ground failure to less than significant. The proposed Project would not create greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FRIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measure B- 2.

Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. d) Be located on expansive soil as defused in Table ] 8-]- B of the Unafbrm Building Code ( 1994), creafing substantial risks to bye or properly?
The proposed Project would not include construction of any habitable stmcmres nor would the Project increase the number of persons at the Project site Thus, the proposed Project would not create substantial risks to life or property and the proposed Project would not create greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FRIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measure B- 2.

Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. e) Have saZv incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste wader disposal systems where sewers are rat avatablefor the disposal ofwaste seater? The proposed Project would not generate any sewage or wastewater and would not require installation of any septic tanks or altemative wastewater systems. No impacts are anticipated in this regard and the proposed Project would not create greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FRIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

FinalI December2017 3- 11 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
59 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883

3. 7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
The previously approved 1990 FEIS/ EIR did not include evaluation for Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, as such an analysis was not required in the CEQA guidelines at the time the 1990 FEIS/ EIR was prepared.

On September 6, 1990, the City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency certified the 1990 FEIS/ EIR that analyzed the potential impacts associated with the Bristol Street Widening Project, which focused on improvements that would result in proposed widening of Bristol Street, from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane, in the City of Santa Ana.

Although this previous environmental document did not include a GHG analysis, a supplemental environmental analysis of GHG impacts cannot be required absent new information on that front ( Citizens for Responsible Equitable Environmental Development [ CREED] v. City of San Diego, [ 2011] 196 Ca1.App. 4th 515, 531.) Information on the effect of greenhouse gas emissions on climate was known long before the City approved the 1990 FEIS/ EIR. ( Id.) Thus, the effect of greenhouse gas emissions on climate could have been raised in 1990 when the City considered the FEIS/ EIR. A challenge to a FEIS/ EIR must be brought within 30 days of the lead agency' s notice of approval. ( Pub. Resources Code, § 21167[ b].) Under Public Resources Code section 21166( c), an agency may not require a supplemental environmental review unless new information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the FEIS/ EIR was approved, becomes available After a project has been subjected to environmental review, the statutory presumption flips in favor of the project proponent and against further review.

Moss v. County of Humboldt [ 2008] 162 Ca1.App. 4th 1041, 1049- 1050.) "`[ S] ectim 21166 comes into play precisely because in- depth review has already occurred [ and] the time for challenging the sufficiency of the original EIR has long since expired."' ( Id., 1050.) There is no competent evidence of new information of severe impact, and thus the City may rely on an addendum. Accordingly, the City fords that GHG impacts and climate change are not new information" under Public Resources Code Section 21166.

Would the project:
a) Gemerate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a * nificamt impact on the environment?
GHG were not evaluated in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR Construction activities would consume fuel and result in the generation of GHG emissions. Construction of the Project is anticipated to occur over a one- year period.

Construction - related GHG emissions would cease upon completion of the Project Due to the length of construction activities, GHG emissions associated with construction activities are anticipated to be minimal. Because construction emissions are not substantial and would cease atter completion of construction, GHG emissions would not be significant
Furthermore, the Project proposes acquiring additional ROW from what was originally analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR. The additional ROW would not change the roadway capacity or over all lane configuration from what was analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR. As the Project involves roadway improvements and not a trip generating land use, only carbon dioxide ( CO2) emissions from mobile -sources are applicable Similar to the other criteria pollutants, the highest emissions would occur between 0 to 10 miles per hour ( mph) and 50 mph and above The proposed Project would improve traffic flow and reduce idling. Because the Project would improve traffic flow within the Project area, the Project would result in reduced CO2 emissions. Modifications involving additional ROW would not result in a change to the road capacity, lane configuration, and impacts that were identified in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR. GHG emissions would be nominal in relation to the global scale of GHG emissions, and there is no evidence that mitigation is necessary for the Project modifications to further demonstrate compliance with the GHG reduction targets of Assembly Bill 32 and Senate Bill 32. Consequently, GHG emissions associated with the Project would be less than significant.

Certifled 1990 FRIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

FinalI December2017 3- 12 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
60 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 b) ConJGct wth an applicable plm5 policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions ofgreenhouce gases?
In December 2015, the City of Santa Ana adopted the Climate Action Plan ( CAP) as a commitment to improving quality of life by reducing carbon pollution and energy use, both from its own operations and from the community as a whole To develop this CAP, an inventory was conducted to determine baseline GHG emissions from the community and from municipal operations for calendar year 2008. A forecast was made of business -as -usual emissions in the absence of any emissions reduction actions. This forecast was then adjusted to account for the emissions reduction expected from statewide policies and from actions that have already been taken by the City since the baseline inventory. Based on community input, suggestions from City staff, analysis of other communities' climate action plans, and consultant recommendations, a list of measures to reduce emissions was developed. Reaching the emissions reduction goals will require residents, businesses, and City govemment to wodc together. The result will be reduced traffic congestion, improved air quality, lower energy use and cost, and improved quality of life for the entire community. The following measures from the CAP are applicable to the proposed Project:

Traffic Signal Synchronization Program: Coridors with synchronized and coordinated traffic signals tend to have shorter travel times, less delay, and reduced congestion. These factors combine reduced fuel usage and emissions. Improvements of intersection operations would help achieve City reduction goals by reducing idling emissions, decreasing congestion and improving traffic flow.

Design Guidelines for Intemal Pedestrian Connectivity: Intemal pedestrian connections such as a sidewalk within a site are an important factor in facilitating non -automotive travel. The level of connectivity relates to the ability to travel within the site to other locations without having to use vehicles or an extemal roadway network which decreaseemissions.

As noted above, the Project would widen the Bristol Street ROW to accommodate a planned roadway/ intersection improvement The Project would improve traffic flow, reduce idling emissions, thereby reducing GHG emissions.

The proposed Project would not conflict with the CAP because it would not increase GHG emissions. The Project would also implement the appliance CAP measures noted above and would further decrease emissions through traffic signal synchronization and the design of an internal pedestrian sidewalk. The Project modifications would not conflict with CAP reduction targets.

Additionally, the proposed Project would not conflict with applicable plans, policy, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHG. The proposed Project would result in improved traffic flow, reduced vehicle idling times, and congestion. Implementation of the proposed Project would not result in new impacts pertaining to GHG emissions.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

3. 8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
This section coresponds with the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Akarures, Subsection V, Construction Impacts, and Subsection X, Hazardous Materials.

Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine trampor5 use, or disposal ofhayardous materials?
The proposed intersection improvements would require relocation of curb/gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, and both public and private utilities ( including the existing traffic signal). Any removal of roadway pavement striping will be required to be surveyed for lead-based paint prior to removal, in compliance with the applicable local, state, and federal regulations administered through the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health.

FinalI December2017 3- 13 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
61 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 No other routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials is anticipated as a result of the proposed Project Thus, compliance with existing regulations would ensure that impacts are not greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. b) Create a sighujsemd hnymrd to the public or the environment through reasonablyforeseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release ofhasardous materials into the environment? As listed in Table 1 Proposed Properiv Acquisition, a total of three Assessor' s Parcel Numbers ( APNs) ( 002- 261- 06, -29, and -30) would be partially acquired as a result of the proposed intersection improvements; refer to Exhibit 5 Proposed Meht- of- 4PavAcaearition. All proposed areas of acquisition include vacantportions of commercial and multi - family residential properties. These vacant areas consist of bare soils, paving/ asphalt, or omamental landscaping. Based on information maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board ( SWRCB), APN 002- 261-06 ( currently a vacant disturbed property located at 2702 N. Bristol Street) was historically Chevron Service Station #9-8787.12 On January28, 1999, three 10,000 -gallon gasolineundergroundstoragetanks (USTs) and one 1,000 -gallon used oil UST were removed from the property.

According to the SWRCB, a release from the USTs, clarifier, sump, and degreaser were reported during tank removal. Site characterization of potential contaminates was completed and, based on groundwater monitoring, determined that only the soil was affected above regulatory thresholds. Contaminated soils were excavated.

Based on a case closure letter issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board ( RWQCB), dated October 22, 2001, completion of the site investigation, remedial action, and groundwater monitoring was completed. 13 No further action related to the reported release is required based on the current land use According to the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, ROW impacts to businesses that may generate hazardous waste or sites that contain underground storage tanks will occur with implementation of the preferred altemative The 1990 FEIS/ EIR acknowledged that it is likely that implementation of the prefered altemative would require the removal of USTs or aboveground storage tanks, or modifications to sites that have historically been handling, processing, or storing hazardous materials. Such activities have the potential to release hazardous wastes into the air or into the ground, but standard construction practices, which would involve careful coordination of design plans or prior notification of construction activity, are expected to minimize these risks and to minimize any disruptions. Thus, compliance with existing regulations and the 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures would ensure that impacts are not greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures:

X- 1 The City of Santa Ana' s Public Works Director will coordinate closely with all agencies and companies which maintain underground or at -grade utility or energy facilities within the areas to be disturbed by project construction activities. Preliminary and final design plans will be made available to such agencies for review and comment At least 48 hours prior to commencement of any excavation activities, the City will contact the Underground Service Alert to notify the affected utility/ energy purveyors who can place their personnel at the excavation site to assist in the location of underground facilities during the exploratory digging immediately preceding excavation. In this manner, the risk of line rupture to natural gas, petroleum, and sewer facilities, which might release hazardous substances and odors in to the air, can be minimized.

X- 2 Should any unidentified substances, odors, leaking underground tanks, or other mysterious and potentially hazardous materials be encountered during project construction, work in that area will be halted and the Santa Ana Fire Department' s Hazardous Materials Team will be contacted to evaluate the materials and to define appropriate remedial measures. 12 StateWater ResourcesControl Board, G oZ acker, hltp://geoftacker.watefbouds.ca.gov/, accessedJuly 24, 2017. 13 Ibid
Final December 2017 3- 14 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
62 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 X- 3 The removal of underground storage tanks will be in accordance with all applicable regulations. For any service stations that will be partially acquired or displaced, the City will request that the owners remove the underground gasoline tanks prior to property acquisition. If the owners do not remove the underground tanks, the City will include the following statement in the right- of-way agreement:

It is understood the property being acquired in this transaction may contain hazardous waste which must be removed or otherwise treated under state or federal Law to protect the public health. If hazardous waste is found to exist on the property, the State may exercise its right to bring an action, if necessary, to recover clean-up costs from the grantors or any others who are ultimately determined to have responsibility for the hazardous waste condition of the property."
Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

C) Emd hmardous emissions or handle hgardous or widely haardaus materials, substances, or waste wBd n one- quarter alto of an existing orproposedschool? The schools closest to the Project site are Santiago Elementary School ( located approximately 0.46 mile south at 2212 N. Baker Street, Santa Ana) and Riverdale Elementary School ( located approximately 0.60 mile west at 13222 Lewis Street, Garden Grove). Thus, no schools are located within one- quarter mile of the Project site and impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. d) Be located on a site which is included on a ltst of hn¢ardaus materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962. 5 and as a result muddit create askgm1wannt haardto the public or the environment?
The Project site includes a former service station where gasoline was reported to have contaminated the soil; the site completed site remediation through appropriate state and local agency standards as required. To that end, the RW QCB issued a case closure letter dated October 22, 2001 stating that no further action was required for the site As discussed in Response 3.8( b), compliance with existing regulations and mitigation measures from the 1990 FEIS/ EIR would ensurethat impacts are not greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures X- 1 through X- 3.

Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. e) For a project located within an airport Iau1 use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted wBd n tiro miles of apubltc airport or public use airport would the project result in a safety has ard for people residing or working in the project area?
The Project site is not within an airport land use plan. The closest airport to the site is John Wayne— Orange County Airport, located approximately 5.9 miles southeast of the Project site The proposed Project would not introduce any new risks or increase risks associated with the Project Impacts in this regard would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

FinalI December2017 3- 15 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
63 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 For a project within the vicinity of aprivate airship, would the project result is a safety hasardfor people residing or working in the project area?
The Project site is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip and would not create any safety hazard. The proposed Project would not create additional significant impact Impacts in this regard would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. g) Impair implementation of or physwaIIy utterfere wide an adapted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
During construction, the disruption of traffic and access along Bristol Street and Memory lane would temporarily affect the mobility of emergency vehicles. However, provisions would be made for interim access through the Project corridor and to adjoining properties; traffic control plans would be prepared detailing provisions for vehicular movement and accessthrough the Project corridor during construction. Advance warning and information signs would be used to inform motorists during the construction process. It is expected that two- way travel would be maintained along Bristol Street during construction. Although the proposed Project may interfere with an emergency evacuation plan, it would be short term during construction and mobility would improve once the Project is completed. Compliance with mitigation measures from the 1990 FEIS/ EIR would ensure that impacts are not greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures
V- 10 Traffic control plans will be prepared prior to each phase of construction. All traffic warning and control devices should comply to the provisions of the State of Califomia Manual of Traffic Controls.

V- 12 Thepolice and fire departments will benotified of construction at least one ( 1) month in advance, as to the particulars of the project ( i. e., project time schedule, and areas to be dismpted, etc.). This action would give the police and fire departments sufficient time to notify its personnel of any significant impediments to traffic.

V- 13 The City will notify the police department at least 48 hours in advance of any turning changes. A minimum three ( 3) signs are required for each indicated change and/ or prevention of movement V- 16 If feasible, construction activities and lane closures will occur primarily during non -peak driving periods.

Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. h) Expose people or shvchwes to a significant risk of Loss, ugury or death uwolvurg midland fines, inchu ing where midlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed wide wildlands?
The proposed Project is located in a highly -urbanized area of the City of Santa Ana. There are no wildlands in the Project vicinity and no new significant impacts would result with Project implementation. Impacts in this regard would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

FinalI December2017 3- 16 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
64 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883

3. 9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
This section corresponds with the following 1990 FEIS/ EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Afiifigadon Measures, subsections:

Subsection C, Erosion Impacts,
Subsection D, Floodplain/ Floodway Ewroochnent, and
Subsection F, Water Qrality.

Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirementr? Under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act ( CWA), the EPA has established regulations under the NPDES program to control direct storm water discharges. Should 1. 0 acre or more of site disturbance occur, those activities would be subject to the NPDES program for the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. The proposed Project would only impact approximately 0. 39 acres, which is less than the 1.0 -acre threshold. Thus, the Project would not be subject to NPDES requirements, as potential waste discharge would be nominal. Furthermore, the Project would be required to comply with the 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measure C- 2, involving the placement of straw or other suitable materials over uncovered soils, as needed, during street coustruction activities, further reducing the amount of erosion occurring at the Project site Regarding operations, the Project would not increase the capacity of the roadway or the number of vehicles using the Project area. Therefore, impacts to water quality would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measure C- 2.

Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

Al Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such but there would be anet deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level ( e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support ezisfing Ianduces or plannedusesfor whiehpermits have beengranten)? The proposed Project would not result in increased water consumption and would not deplete groundwater supplies.

No impact to groundwater supplies would result from the proposed Project Impacts in this regard would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

C) Substantially after the ezisfing drainage pattern of the site or area including through the afteradon of the course of a sueam or river, in a mmmer that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site ?
The proposed Project would only nominally increase the paved/impervious areas of the Project site. This nominal increase would not result in a substantial increase in erosion or siltation on- or off- site. Further, implementation of 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measure C-2 would reduce any potential erosion/ siltation impacts during construction.

Thus, impacts in this regard would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measure C- 2 Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

FinalI December2017 3- 17 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
65 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 d) Substantially alter the existing dramige pattern ofthe she or area ntchu ing through the alteration of fixe course of a sheer, or river, or substantially increase the rate or amoa id of surface rammQrin a manner that would result inflooding on- or QQ=sde?
Currently, theProject site only includes curb and no catch basin is present As a result, seasonal ponding does occur along this portion of Bristol Street The proposed Project would result in a nominal increase in impervious ground surfaces. However, development of the Project would result in the relocation of the existing curb features at the Project site Thus, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in a substantial increase compared to the existing condition. Further, Project development may include extension of the existing storm water pipeline system located on the eastern side of Bristol Street) through a new lateral connection and new catch basin at the Project site These improvements, if constructed, would result in a reduction of existing flooding and would be a beneficial impact Thus, impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. e) Create or contribute runoff seater which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm seater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources ofpohhrtednmof/ 7 Refer to Response 3.9(a). Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR Cerfifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
Refer to Response 3.9(a). Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR Cerfifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. g) Place homing withinn700- yearfloodhayard area inmapped on afederal F7oodAayardBoaunday or F7oodlnsurance Rate Map or otherfloodhayarddelineation map? The Project site is located outside of the 100 -year flood zone." Further, the proposed Project would not construct any housing. Therefore, no impact would result from the proposed Project in this regard. Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures arerequired. h) Place within nl00yeaifloodhasardarea structures which would impede or redhectfloodflows? Refer to Response 3.9( g). Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Cerfified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 14 FederalEmergencyManagement Agency, FEMA Flood Map ;ServiceCenter, hltps://msc.fema.gov/portal/search? AddressQuery— memory% 201anO/ aC% 20smta% 20ana#searctvesWtsmchor, accessed August 3, 2017.

FinalI December2017 3- 18 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
66 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 i) Expose people or sbvctures to a significant risk of Loss, injury or death irwolvhV flooding, includingflooding as aresult of thefuhue of ¢levee trouts? The proposed Project does not involve the construction of new habitable structures or people at the Project site Therefore, the Project would not expose people or habitable structures to a significant flooding risk beyond that which already exists. Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures arerequired. j) Inundation by seiche, hununi, or muojlow?
The Project site is located approximately 15 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean; therefore, the likelihood of tsunami impacting the site is minimal. The Project site and vicinity are highly urbanized and there are no nearby water bodies or unusual slopes or geologic features in the area. No impacts involving seiche, tsunami, or mdflow are anticipated. Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measure: No additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 10 LAND USE AND PLANNING
This section corresponds with the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Alearures, Subsection A, Landform Modification.

Would the project:
a) physicaby divide an established commundy?
The proposed Project involves the widening of the intersection of Bristol Street and Memory Lane; the proposed Project would not divide an established community. Although the proposed widening of Bristol Street within the Project limits would result in partial acquisition of existing properties, the Project would not create a physical barrier to, or separate, a community. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. b) Coaket mitt my applicable Iced use plus policy, or regulation of an agency svth jurisdiction over the project ( including, bid not limited to the general plus specfic plus Local coastal program, or Eonueg ordtseuece) adoptedfor the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? According to the City of. SardaAm General Plan ( General Plan), the Project area is designated General Commercial GC) and Low Density Residential ( LDR- 7). The zoning designation of properties within the Project area are Speck Development ( SD27) which is developed as the Portofino Apartments and Community Commercial ( Cl) which allows for retail and service uses. The proposed Project would not result in changes to the land use designation ofthe acquired parcels. The proposed Project is in compliance with the existing designations and would not create a new conflict It is acknowledged that due to building setback requirements, the Project would require approval from the City Manager for landscape strip Exceptions for building setbacks per Municipal Code Section 41- 781. With City Manager approval, the Project would be consistent with the Municipal Code requirements. No significant impacts would result and impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

FinalI December2017 3- 19 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
67 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 Certifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

C) Coahet with any applicable habitatconservation plan or natural community conservation plaut? The Project site is not a part of any habitat conservation plan, and is located within a highly -urbanized area within the City of Santa Ana. The proposed Project would not conflict with any habitat conservation plan or natural community. No impact is anticipated. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

This section corresponds with the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Akasures, Subsection W, Consumption of Renewable and Non -Renewable Resources.

Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of avaiabltlty of ak nmvn mineral resource ofvalue to the region and the residents of the state?
The Project site is currently developed and does not contain any areasthat are utilized for the extraction of mineral resources. Furthermore, the proposed Project would not involve excavation that would likely identify previously unidentified mineral resources. No impact to mineral resources would result from the proposed Project Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. b) Result in the loss of avalabr7ity, of a locally - imported mineral resource recovery site delineated on a loealgeneral play specific plan or other land me plan?
The Project site is curenfly developed and is not delineated as a mineral resources recovery site by the City' s General Plan. Implementation of the proposed Project would have no impact on the mineral resources and no mitigation measures are necessary. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures arerequired.

3. 12 NOISE
This section coresponds with the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Akasures, Subsection I, Mire, and Subsection V, Condructionlapaciv Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? FinalI December2017 3- 20 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
68 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 The proposed Project involves widening the west side of Bristol Street, north of the intersection of Bristol Street and Memory Lane, in an urbanized area of multi- and single-family residential uses, commercial uses, and vacant land.

The widening of the proposed ROW from 100 feet to 111 feet will not substantially change the noise levels which were analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR. Changes to traffic noise impacts typically occur when there is a substantial horizontal alteration to the roadway. The Caltrans Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol guidance per federal regulations 23 CFR 772) defines a substantial horizontal alteration as a project that halves the distance between the traffic noise source and the closest receptor between the existing condition to the frmre build condition. The existing distance from the ROW to the closest receptor is approximately 30 feet When adding the additional 11 feet to the ROW, this is less than half of the distance which means that the Project does not cause a substantial horizontal alteration. The Proposed Project modifications would not result in any new long -tern mobile and stationary noise impacts. Only nominal changes to grading or construction activities would occur. No increases to road vehicle capacity would occur. No new impacts have been identified and no new mitigation measures are required. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures
I- 1 Construction activities will take place only during the hours specified in the City of Santa Ana Noise Control Ordinance to reduce noise impacts during more sensitive time periods.

I- 2 All construction equipment, fixed or mobile, operated within 1,000 feet of a dwelling shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained muffler exhaust systems.

I- 3 Stationary equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers such as residential areas.

I- 4 Stockpiling and vehicle staging areasshall be located asfar as practical from occupied dwellings.

I- 5 Every effort will be made to create the greatest distance between noise sources and receptors during construction.

I- 6 The noisiest construction operations will be aranged to occur together in the coustruction program to avoid continuing periods of greater annoyance
Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive grouadborae vibration or groundborne noise Levels?
Refer to Response 3.12(a). During Project construction, noise associated with construction may intermittently dominate the noise environment in the immediate area of construction. No additional adverse noise impacts from construction are anticipated as construction would comply with the City of Santa Ana Municipal Code, which limits construction noise to the least noise sensitive portions of the day. Construction equipment would be properly fitted and maintained according to the manufacturer' s specifications. Furthermore, construction noise would be short- term, temporary, and cease upon completion of the proposed Project Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR with implementation of mitigation measures and would not be greater than what was previously analyzed.

The proposed widening of Bristol Street and ROW acquisition just north of Memory Lane would involve additional ROW take at adjoining properties in order to accommodate the third southbound through lane ( considered in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR). These changes would be nominal and would result in similar noise levels as the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, which would be below significant levels. The Proposed Project modifications would not result in any new long- term mobile and stationary noise impacts. No changes to grading or construction activities would occur. No increases to road vehicle capacity or lane configurations would occur. No new impacts have been identified and no new mitigation measures are required. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

FinalI December2017 3- 21 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
69 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

C) A substantial permanent increase is ambient noise levels is the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
Refer to Responses 3. 12(a) and 3.12(6). Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FFIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures are required. 14 A substantial tempormy or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above Levels existing without the project?
Refer to Response 3. 12(a), for discussion regarding temporary noise impacts associated with Project coustmction.

Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures I- 1 through I- 6.

Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures are required. e) For a project located within as airport laud use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted within two miles of apubtc airport or public use airport wouldthe project expose people residing or mmking in the project areata excessive noise levels?
The Project site is not located within an airport land use plan. The nearest airport is the John Wayne — Orange County Airport, located approximately 5.9 miles from the proposed Project No impacts would occur. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures are required.

For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, wuhdd the project ¢ spas¢ people residing or worlung in the project areata excessive noise levels?
Refer to Response 3. 12(e). The proposed Project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 13 POPULATION AND HOUSING
This section corresponds with the following 1990 FEIS/ EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mfigadon Medssures, subsections:

Subsection L, Population;
Subsection M, Housing Displacement;
Subsection N, Business Displacement,
Subsection 0, Impacts on Neighborhood Churacwr andMmority Groups; and Subsection R, Effict on Assessed Property Values.

FinalI December2017 3- 22 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
70 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area either directly ( jbr example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly ( jbr example, through extension of roads or other mfrastrmeture)?
The proposed Project involves the partial acquisition of three parcels in order to widen Bristol Street, located within a highly urbanized and built - out area. The proposed Project is designed to accommodate the existing and future traffic volume and would not create new trips. The proposed Project would not result in additional impacts.

Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. b) Displace substantial members of exiekng housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
A total of three properties would be partially acquired as a result of the proposed widening of Bristol Street All proposed areas of acquisition include vacant portions of commercial and multi - family residential properties. These vacant areas consist of paving/ asphalt or ornamental landscaping. The acquisitions would comply with policies pursuant to the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as implemented by the City of Santa Ana. No removal of housing would occur. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Refer to Response 3. 13(6). Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 14 PUBLIC SERVICES
This section couesponds with the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Alearures, Subsection P, Impacts on Community Facilities, and Subsection V, Construction Impacts. a) Would the project result insubstantial adverse physical impacts associatedwith the provision ofnew or physically altered governmental factitles, need for new or physically altered governmental facaiites, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable serve ratios, response tunes or other performance objectives for my of the public services:
i) Fire Protection?
The proposed Project includes intersection improvements and no increase in demand for fire protection services would occur with implementation of the proposed Project Furthcunore, the proposed Project would result in positive impacts as a result of greater congestion relief and increased mobility in the vicinity for motor vehicles including emergency vehicles. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

FinalI December2017 3- 23 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
71 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. b) Police Protection?
Refer to Response 3. 14( a)( i). The proposed Project would not result in the need or increase the demand for police services in the area. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

C) Schools?
The proposed Project does not involve any new development and no new population would result Therefore, no schools or school services would be impacted by the proposed Project Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures are required. d) Parks?
The proposed Project does not involve any new development and no new population would result There are no parks within the Project limits, and no needs for additional park services would occur as a result of the proposed Project Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. e) Otherpublicfactddes?
The proposed Project does not involve any new development and no new population would result Therefore, the Project would not generate demands for other public facilities. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR
Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 15 RECREATION
This section coresponds with the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Akasures, Subsection P, Impact on Recreational Facilifies. a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational factides such that substantial physical deterioration of the fwddy would occur or be accelerated?
The proposed Project involves the widening of Bristol Street, just north of Memory Lane, to accommodate a third southbound through lane within a highly urbanized and built - out area in the City. The widening of Bristol Street would not induce growth, nor create demand for recreation - related services. Furthermore, the proposed Project FinalI December2017 3- 24 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
72 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 would not result in the physical deterioration of recreational facilities. No mitigation measures are required with regards to recreational resources. Impacts would not be greater than thatpreviously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

Al Does the project include recreational fac> Tities or require the construction or expansion of recreationalfacilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Refer to Response 3. 15( a). The proposed Project does not include, nor would it require, construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, no adverse physical impact on the environment would occur from such facilities as a result of the proposed Project No mitigation measures are required. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. k%[ cam III "MZ69141AfAdIs] : lYd'" JJN
This section corresponds with the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, Section IV, En ironmental Consequences and Mitigation Aleasures, Subsection U, Impacts to Transportation Facilities, and Subsection V, Construcitonlmpacir.

Would the project:
a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the Performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit andnoromotont edhowel andrelevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways andfreeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit?
The proposed Project is consistent with the applicable plans, ordinances and policies establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system as described in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR. The widening of Bristol Street was designated in the Orange County Master Plan, and was recommended in the Bristol Street Corridor Study— Final Report, prepared by Motile, Grover & Associates, dated 1983. It was also recommended in the Arterial Highway Element —. Banda Ana Element — Smta Am Transportation Corridor State H Alternative Analysis, prepared by Parsons, Brinekerhoff, Quade and Douglas, Inc., dated 1983. The proposed Project is also consistent with the recommendation found in the Intercity Liaison Committee — Five -Year Trmsportafion Study Update to 1990, prepared by Basmaciyan- Darnell, Inc., dated 1985. Furthermore, the proposed Project would improve traffic operations through the Project corridor. Based on traffic count data provided as part of the Akarure Al2 Comprehensive Trmrportafion Fuming Program Call for Projects, prepared by the City of Santa Ana, for the Orange County Transportation Authority, dated October 20, 2016, the existing Level of Service (LOS) at the Bristol StreebMemory Lane intersection is LOS C in the AM Peak Hour and a LOS E during the PM Peak Hour. Upon completion of the proposed Project, the Peak Hour LOS at this intersection would be improved to a LOS B in the AM Peak Hour and a LOS D in the PM Peak Hour. Therefore, the Project would result in an overall beneficial impact pertaining to traffic and would notbe greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No new additional mitigation measures are required. b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, btelu ding, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management Weneyfor designatedroads or highways? FinalI December2017 3- 25 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
73 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 According to the 2015 Orange County Congestion Management Program, prepared by the Orange County Transportation Authority, dated November 2015, the intersection of Bristol Street and Memory Lane is not a CMP intersection, nor is this intersection located along a CMP Highway System. Further, as discussed in Response

3. 16( a), the proposed Project would result in an improvement to both the AM and PM Peak Hour LOS. As the proposed Project would not increase the capacity of the roadway network, the Project would not result in greater impacts than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

C) Result it a charge in air tri0ho patterns, including either an increase it trios, levels or a charge it location that results insubstantial safety risks?
The closest airport to the site is John Wayne— Orange County Airport, located approximately 5.9 miles southeast of the Project site; the proposed Project would have no impact on air traffic patterns. The proposed Project would not introduce any new risks or increase risks. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. d/ Substantially increase haards due tr a design feature ( e.g., sharp curves or dangerous mterseedoma) or incompatible uses ( e g., farm equipment)? The proposed Project would improve the traffic flow at the Bristol Street and Memory Lane intersection and would not create any sharp curves or other incompatible uses. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
The proposed Project would improve traffic operations along Bristol Street in the long -tern. During the construction phasetraffic flow along Bristol Streetwithin the Project limits could be temporarily affected, including the mobility of emergency vehicles; however, access, including two- way travel would be maintained through the Project corridor during construction. Traffic control plans would be prepared prior to construction to facilitate traffic movement through the Project corridor during construction. Although the proposed Project may interfere with emergency access in the short -tern, it would improve emergency access once the Project is completed.

Implementation of 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures V- 10, V- 12, V- 13 and V- 16 would reduce impacts associated with inadequate emergency accessto a less than significant level. Impacts would notbe greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures V- 10, V- 12, V- 13, and V- 16.

Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

Conflict with adapted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit bicycle, or pedestrian fzeiWes, or otherwise decrease the performance or safely of suchfacz7ities? The proposed Project would not conflict with any alternative transportation plan and would increase safety associated with improvements to the traffic operations through the Project area. The proposed Project would not FinalI December2017 3- 26 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
74 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 result in impacts greater than as described in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR
Certified 1990 FEIS/ FIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable.

Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 17 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
As of July 1, 2015, California Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) was enacted and expanded CEQA by establishing a formal consultation process for California tribes within the CEQA process. The bill specifies that any project may affect or cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource would require a lead agency to begin consultation with a California Native American tribe that is traditional and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project" Section 21074 of AB 52 also defines a new category of resources under CEQA called tribal cultural resources. Tribal cultural resources are defined as " sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a Califomia Native American tribe" and is either listed on or eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources or a local historic register, or if the lead agency chooses to treat the resource as a tribal cultural resource.

Notwithstanding, AB 52 applies to all new applications deemed complete on or atter July 1, 2015. Thus, as the proposed improvements are an Amendment to the existing Bristol Street Widening Project, and not a new Application, AB 52 does not apply to this Project
On February 19, 2016, the Califomia Natural Resources Agency proposed to adopt and amend regulations as part of AB 52 implementing Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 of the California Code of Regulations, CEQA Guidelines, to include consideration of impacts to tribal cultural resources pursuant to Goverment Code Section 11346. 6. On September 27, 2016, the California Office of Administrative Law approved the amendments to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, and these amendments are addressed within this Addendum. a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse charge is the sigurwamce of a tribal cultural resource, delured is Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographicalty defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to aCaVorniaNativeAmerlean tribe, morbid is:
i) Listed or eligible for Hsibur in the CaVornia Register ofllistorical Resources, or in alocal register of hish, ric at resources an, deal
el
d in Pub He R e sourc es Co de sectors 5020. 1( k), or
According to the City of Santa Ana, no Native American - related historical resources are present within the Project vicinity 15 Based on the 1990 FEIS/EIR, no historical or archaeologicalresourceswere identified in the Project vicinity. During public noticing period for the Bristol Street Widening Project, a letter received from the Office of Historic Preservation indicated that the Bristol Widening Project would not affect historic properties. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in greater impacts than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ FIR Mitigation Measures
T- 1 If potential archeological resources are encountered during grading all work will be halted in that particular location until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the recovered materials.

Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 15 City of SantaAna, Aopeoy Information march, htip://www.ci.smta-ma.ca.us/property-info/, accessedAnon 17, 2017
FinalI December2017 3- 27 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
75 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 u) A resource determined by the lead agency, is its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significad pursued to criteria set forth in subdivision ( c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024. 1. In applying the criteriasetforth in subdivision ( c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024. 1, the Lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

The Project is not subject to AB 52 and did not undergo the AB 52 Consultation Process. Notwithstanding the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, no historical or archaeological resources were identified in the Project vicinity pertaining to Native American resources. Further, during public noticing periods, letters received from the Office of Historic Preservation indicated that the Bristol Widening Project would not affect historic properties. No correspondence from any tribes were received during the 1990 FEIS/EIR. No new impacts have been identified. Should any unknown tribal cultural resources be uncovered during grading/ site disturbance activities, the Project would be required to comply with the 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measure T- 1. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant
Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measure T- 1.

Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 18 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
This section corresponds with the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Aleasures, Subsection S, Effect on Utilities, and Subsection V, Construction Impacts.

Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater neabnent requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
The proposed Project entails intersection improvements; such improvements would not result in the generation of wastewater. No new significant impact is anticipated. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

Z) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treabmentfaeaifiies or expansion of existingfaefiities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? The proposed Project would not require or result in the constmetion of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. No new significant impact is anticipated. Implementation of 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures V- 14 and V- 17 would reduce impacts to less than significant Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures:

V- 14 Project plans and construction activities will be closely coordinated with local utility purveyors in order to make the necessary arrangements for the relocation of facilities and avoid or minimize any disruption to service. It is also recommended that the utilities provide adequate notice to its customers of any service disruptions.

V- 17 The City of Santa Ana' s Public Works Director will coordinate closely with all agencies and companies which maintain underground or at -grade utility or energy facilities within the areas to be disturbed by project construction activities. Preliminary and final design plans will be made available to such agencies for review and comment At least 48 hours prior to commencement of any excavation activities, the City will contact the Underground Service Alert to notify the affected utility/ energy purveyors who can place their personnel at the excavation site to assist in the location of underground FinalI December2017 3- 28 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
76 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 facilities during the exploratory digging immediately preceding excavation. In this manner, the risk of line rupture to natural gas, petroleum, and sewer facilities, which might release hazardous substances and odors into the air, can be minimized.

Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

C) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage faefiities or expansion of existing faca7ifies, the construction ofwhichcouldcause significant environmental effects? As discussed in Response 3.9( d), the Project site curenty includes only curb and no catch basin is present As a result, seasonal pouding does occur along this portion of Bristol Street The proposed Project would result in a nominal increase in impervious ground surfaces. The Project would result in the relocation of the existing curb features at the Project site and may include extension of the existing storm water pipeline system ( located on the eastern side of Bristol Street) through a new lateral connection and new catch basin at the Project site These improvements, if constructed, would result in a reduction of existing flooding and would be a beneficial impact Thus, impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ FIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 14 Have sii.Twient water suppHes available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?
The proposed Project entails the intersection improvements; as such, the Project would not result in any increase in water demand/cousumption. Landscape improvements, if applicable, would not require any new or expanded water entitlements and would not be substantially increased, compared to that analyzed as part of the Bristol Street Widening Project Thus, the proposed Project would not create any new significant environmental impact Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ FIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that B has adequate capaeRy to serve the project' s projected demand in addition to the provider' s existing commitments?
Refer to Response 3. 17( x) and 3. 17( 6). The proposed Project would not result in an increase in wastewater production. Impacts would not be greater than previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certifled 1990 FEIS/ FIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

Be served by a laiiafiff with sioLcient permitted capaerity to aeacommodate the project' s solid wale disposal needs?
The proposed Project would generate construction waste on a short - tern basis. Construction waste that cannot be recycled would be taken to available landfills. The closest receiving landfills for the City are the Frank R.

Bowerman Sanitary Landfill at 11002 Bee Canyon Access Road in Irvine, and the Olinda Alpha Landfill at 1942N.

Valencia Avenue in Brea. The Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill, which is owned and operated by the Orange County Integrated Waste Management Department, opened in 1990, and has enough projected capacity to serve residentsandbusinessesuntil approximately2053.16The OlindaAlpha Landfill openedin 1960, andhasenough 16 Orange County Waste and Recycling, Preek R. BowermanLandfill, hltp://www.oclandfills.coMlmdfill/ acfive/ bowennan, accessed August 17, 2017.

FinalI December2017 3- 29 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
77 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 projected capacity to serveresidentsandbusinessesuntil approximately2030.1/ Olinda' s average disposalrate is nearly 7,000 tons per day ( TPD), although it permitted up to 8,000 TPD. Thus, these facilities have adequate landfill capacity to serve the proposed Project and no new significant environmental impact would result from the Project implementation. Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. g) Comply wdhfederedstore, mulloeal starmesand regulations relatedto solid mule? Refer to Response 3.18(f). The proposed Project would comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. The Project would comply with the City of Santa Ana' s established reduction, reuse, and recycling programs. No new significant solid waste impact would result from the proposed Project Impacts would be similar to those identified in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR.

Certified 1990 FEIS/ EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required.

3. 19 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Based on this Addendum, the proposed Project has not substantially changed in regard to the setting, design, impacts, and mitigation measures as described in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR New circumstances or new information, including any new or revised environmental laws, regulations, or policies have not modified the impacts of the proposed Project
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment substaetatly reduce the habitat of a fish or wtldhfe species, cause a fish or wtldhfe population lo drop below self- suRaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or mhhnal commnmrtg substa thatly reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history orprehistory? The proposed Project would not result in impacts beyond those identified in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR in this regard, and does not have the potential to degrade the environment, reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, threaten plant or animal communities, reduce or restrict endangered plant or animal species or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or prehistory with compliance with the 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually, tumind bad camelatvely considerable? Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of ¢ project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects ofprobablefutu re projects)?
Given the nature and scope of the proposed Project, and in consideration of mitigation measures that are included in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR, the Project would not involve impacts that are cumulatively considerable C) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Construction -related activities are anticipated to have some relatively minor, temporary impacts which can be mitigated with implementation of measures included in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR Furthermore, potential long -tern operational) impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels through implementation of required 1990 FEIS/ EIR mitigation measures.

Orange County Waste and Recycling, Olinda Alpha Landfill, hltp://www. oclandfills. coMlmdfill/ acfive/ olindalandfill, accessed October 16, 2017.

FinalI December2017 3- 30 Environmental Consequences

City Council
14 –
78 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883

4. 0 REFERENCES
The following references were utilized for the preparation of this Addendum:

California Depautuent of Conservation, Orange County Important Farmland 2014, ftp:// ftp. consrv.ca.gov/ pub/ dlrp/ FMMP/ pdf/ 2014/ora14. pdf, accessed August 17, 2017.

California Depautuent of Transportation, California Scenic Highway Mapping System, http:// www. dot.ca.gov/ hq/ LandArch/ 16_ livability/ scenic _highway s/index. turn, accessedAugust 30, 2017.

California Geological Survey, Fault Activity Map of California http:// maps.croservatim. ca.gov/ cgs/f"am/App/ index. html, accessed August 3, 2017.

City of Santa Ana, City ofSartaAna General Plan, adopted September 1982, as amended.

City of Santa Ana, Chywuk Design Gauktines.

City of Santa Ana, Final Enwronmental Impact statement ( FSIs) for Bristol Street TIVirkningfrom Warner Avenue to rbkmory Lane, dated 1990.

City of Santa Ana, Property Information Search, http:// www. ci.santa-ma. ca. us/property- info/, accessedAugust 17, 2017.

City of Santa Ana, Measure M2 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program Call for Projects, dated October 20, 2016.

Department of Conservation ( DOC), Fault Activity Map of California http:// maps.conservation. ca.gov/ cgs/fain/ App/ index. html, accessed August 2017.

Department of Toxic Substances Control, ErmiroStor, http:// www. mvirostor. dtsc.ca.gov/ public/, accessedAugust 2, 2017.

Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA Flood Map Service Center, https://msc.fema. gov/ portal/ search? AddressQuery mory% 201ane%2C% 20smmO/o20ana# searchresultsanchor, accessed August 3, 2017.

Orange County Transportation Authority, 2015 Orange County Congestion Management Program, dated November 2015.

Orange County Waste and Recycling, Frank R. Bowerman Landfill, htfp:// www. oclmdfills. com/lmdfilVacfive bowertnan, accessed August 17, 2017.

Orange County Waste and Recycling Olinda Alpha Landfill, http:// www. oclandfills. com/lmdfill/ active/ olindalandfill, accessed October 16, 2017.

Google Earth, accessed September 2017.

POWER Engineers, Bristol Sbeet Widening Phase IIIA— Civic Center Drive to 4Pashington Avenue Environmental Impact ReportAddendum, Janunty20, 2015.

Southern California Association of Governments, 2016- 2040 Regional Transportation Plan Sustainable Communities Strategy ( RTP/ SCS), Transportation System Project List, 2016.

Southern Califomia Association of Governments, Final 2017 Federal Transportation Improvement Program, 2016.

Snue Water Resources Control Board, GeoTraker, http:// geotracker. waterbouds. ca.gov/, accessedJuly 24, 2017.

FinalI December2017 4- 1 References

City Council
14 –
79 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements —ProjectNo. 17-6883 United States Department of Agriculture, Web Soil Se ey, https:// websoilsurvey. sc.egov.usda.gov/AppAVebSoil Survey. aspx, accessed August 2, 2017.

FinalI December2017 4- 2 References

City Council
14 –
80 2/17/2026

Appendix A
Modified Initial Study Checklist

City Council
14 –
81 2/17/2026

City Council
14 –
82 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements - ProjectNo. 17-6883 Aloaifiedlmfial Study Checklist
The following Modified Initial Study Checklist is based on the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Initial Study Checklist It is modified to evaluate the proposed Project changes for which environmental impact reports/ statements have previously been completed to assist in the determination of the need for supplemental environmental documents, in this case, a Subsequent or Supplemental EIS/ FIR or an Addendum under Public Resources Code 21166 and Guideline Sections 15162, 15163, and 15164, respectively. For purposes of this study, references to " the proposal' in the lett hand column questions refer to the modifications to the Project ( proposed Project) as compared the Project improvements evaluated in the 1990 FEIS/ EIR The first four columns to the right of the modified checklist questions identify whether the proposed Project changes would result in new impacts, and if so whether these impacts would be less than significant, less than significant atter mitigation, or significant
The fifth column asks whether or not the impacts associated with Project changes, if any, were sufficiently disclosed in the previous environmental documents.

Finally, the last column indicates whether or not a Subsequent or Supplemental FIR is needed. Moreover, a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR would be needed if there were new significant unmitigated or substantially more severe impacts, which would result from the Project changes and which were not sufficiently disclosed in the previous environmental document.

FinalI December2017 1 Appendix A- Modified Initial Study Checklist

City Council
14 –
83 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements - ProjectNo. 17-6883

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
FinalI December2017 2 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial StudyChecklist New Impacts ofProposed Premous FEISIEIR
Project Changes
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required?
Mitigabon

1. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a X
scenic vista? YES NO
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock X YES NOoutcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual
character or quality ofthe site and its X YES NO
surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light
or glare, which would adversely affect day X YES NO
or nighttime views in the area?

2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES.

Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance ( Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland X YES NO
Mapping and Monitoring Program ofthe
California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act X YES NO
contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or
cause rezoning of, forest land ( as defined
in Public Resources Code section
12220(g)), timberland ( as defined by Public X YES NO
Resources Code section 4526), or
timberland zoned Timberland Production
as defined by Government Code section
51104(8))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or
conversionofforestlandtonon- forest X YES NO
use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of

X YES NO
Farmland, to non- agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non - forest
use?

3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation X YES NO
ofthe applicable air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or
contribute substantially to an existing or X YES NO
projected air quality violation?
FinalI December2017 2 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial Study Checklist

City Council
14 –
84 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements - ProjectNo. 17-6883

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
FinalI December2017 3 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial StudyChecklist New Impacts ofProposed Premous FEISIEIR
Project Changes
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required?
Mitigabon
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable
net increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non - attainment
under an applicable federal or state

X YES NO
ambient air quality standard ( including
releasing emissions which exceed
quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant concentrations? X YES NO
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a
substantialnumberofpeople? X YES NO

4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the
project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special - status species in local X YES NO or regional plans, policies, or regulations,
or by the California Department of Fish and
Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on
any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local or X YES NO
regional plans, policies, or regulations or
by the California Department of Fish and
Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands as defined by
Section 404 ofthe Clean Water Act
including but not limited to, marsh, vernal X YES NO
pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other
means?
d) Interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with X YES NO
established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological resources, X YES NO
such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
FinalI December2017 3 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial Study Checklist

City Council
14 –
85 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements - ProjectNo. 17-6883

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
FinalI December2017 4 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial StudyChecklist New Impacts ofProposed Premous FEISIEIR
Project Changes
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required?
Mitigabon
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan, or other X YES NO
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?

5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the
project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a historical resource as X YES NO
defined in § 15064. 5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of an archaeological X YES NO
resource pursuant to § 15064. 5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique X YES NO
geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including
those interred outside of formal X YES NO
cemeteries?

6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the
project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the
risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-
Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area X YES NO
or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of Mines
and Geology Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X YES NO
iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including X YES NO liquefaction?
iv) Landslides? X YES NO
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the X YES NO
loss Oftopsoil?
FinalI December2017 4 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial Study Checklist

City Council
14 –
86 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements - ProjectNo. 17-6883

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
FinalI December2017 5 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial StudyChecklist New Impacts ofProposed Premous FEISIEIR
Project Changes
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required?
Mitigabon
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that
is unstable, or that would become unstable
as a result of the project, and potentially X YES NO
result in on- or off- site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or
collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined
in Table 18- 1-B ofthe Uniform Building X YES NO
Code ( 1994), creating substantial risks to
life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems X YES NO
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?

7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS.

Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions,
either directly or indirectly, that may have a X YES NO significant impact on the environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy
or regulation adopted for the purpose of X YES NO
reducing the emissions of greenhouse
gases?

8. HAZARDS. Would the project involve:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment through the routine X YES NO
transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions X YES NO
involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, X YES NO
substances, or waste within one- quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included
on a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government Code X YES NO
Section 65962. 5 and, as a result, would it
create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment?
FinalI December2017 5 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial Study Checklist

City Council
14 –
87 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements - ProjectNo. 17-6883

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
FinalI December2017 6 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial StudyChecklist New Impacts ofProposed Premous FEISIEIR
Project Changes
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required?
Mitigabon
e) For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would X YES NO
the project result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the project
area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, would the project result in a X YES NO safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency X YES NO
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires, including where X YES NO
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas
or where residences are intermixed with
wildlands?

9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or X YES NO
waste discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or
a lowering ofthe local groundwater table X YES NO
level ( e. g, the production rate of pre-
existing nearby wells would drop to a level
that would not support existing land uses
or planned uses for which permits have
been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern ofthe site or area, including
through the alteration ofthe course of a X YES NO
stream or river, in a manner that would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on -
or off- site?
FinalI December2017 6 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial Study Checklist

City Council
14 –
88 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements - ProjectNo. 17-6883

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
FinalI December2017 7 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial StudyChecklist New Impacts ofProposed Premous FEISIEIR
Project Changes
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required?
Mitigabon
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern ofthe site or area, including
through the alteration ofthe course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase X YES NO
the rate or amount of surface runoff in a
manner that would result in Flooding on- or
off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoffwater which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned storm water drainage systems or X YES NO
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water X YES NO
quality?
g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood
hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood
Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate X YES NO
Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
h) Place within a 100 - year flood hazard
area structures which would impede or X YES NO
redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to
significant risk of loss, injury or death X YES NO
involving flooding, including flooding as a
result ofthe failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or X YES NO
mudflow?

10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would
the project:
a) Physically divide an established X YES NO
community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use
plan, policy, or regulation of an agency
with jurisdiction over the project ( including,
but not limited to the general plan, specific X YES NO
plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat
conservation plan or natural community X YES NO
conservation plan?
FinalI December2017 7 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial Study Checklist

City Council
14 –
89 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements - ProjectNo. 17-6883

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
FinalI December2017 8 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial StudyChecklist New Impacts ofProposed Premous FEISIEIR
Project Changes
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required?
Mitigabon

11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Wouldthe
project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would be of X YES NO
value to the region and the residents of the
state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a
locally -important mineral resource recovery X YES NO
site delineated on a local general plan,
specific plan or other land use plan?

12. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of
noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or X YES NO
noise ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of
excessive groundborne vibration or X YES NO
groundborne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity X YES NO
above levels existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic
increase in ambient noise levels in the X YES NO
project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport, would X YES NO
the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive
noise levels?
FinalI December2017 8 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial Study Checklist

City Council
14 –
90 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements - ProjectNo. 17-6883

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
FinalI December2017 9 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial StudyChecklist New Impacts ofProposed Premous FEISIEIR
Project Changes
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required?
Mitigabon
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, would the project expose X YES NO
people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?

13. POPULATION AND HOUSING.

Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in
an area, either directly ( for example, by
proposing new homes and businesses) or X YES NO
indirectly ( for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction of X YES NO
replacement housing elsewhere?
c) c) Displace substantial numbers of people,
necessitating the construction of X YES NO
replacement housing elsewhere?

14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the
project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities,
the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order
to maintain acceptable service ratios,
response times or other performance
objectives for any ofthe public services:
a) Fire protection? X YES NO
b) Police protection? X YES NO
c) Schools? X YES NO
d) Parks? X YES NO
e) Other public facilities? X YES NO

15. RECREATION
a) Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities such that X YES NO
substantial physical deterioration ofthe
facility would occur or be accelerated?
FinalI December2017 9 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial Study Checklist

City Council
14 –
91 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements - ProjectNo. 17-6883

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
FinalI December2017 10 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial StudyChecklist New Impacts ofProposed Premous FEISIEIR
Project Changes
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required?
Mitigabon
b) Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities that X YES NO
might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment?

16. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC.

Would the project:
a) Conflict with an applicable plan,
ordinance or policy establishing measures
of effectiveness for the performance of the
circulation system, taking into account all
modes of transportation including mass
transit and non - motorized travel and X YES NO
relevant components ofthe circulation
system, including but not limited to
intersections, streets, highways and
freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths,
and mass transit?
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion
management program, including, but not
limited to level of service standards and
travel demand measures, or other X YES NO
standards established by the county
congestion management agency for
designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns,
including either an increase in traffic levels X YES NO or a change in location that results in
substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a
design feature ( e. g, sharp curves or X YES NO
dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses ( e. g, farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency X YES NO
access?
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or
programs regarding public transit, bicycle,
or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise X YES NO
decrease the performance or safety of
such facilities?
FinalI December2017 10 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial Study Checklist

City Council
14 –
92 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements - ProjectNo. 17-6883

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
FinalI December2017 11 Appendix A- Modified Initial Study Checklist New Impacts ofProposed Premous FEISIEIR
Project Changes
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required?
Mitigabon

17. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES.
a) Would the project cause a substantial
adverse change in the significance of a
tribal cultural resource, defined in Public
Resources Code section 21074 as either a
site, feature, place, cultural landscape that
is geographically defined in terms of the
size and scope of the landscape, sacred
place, or object with cultural value to a
California Native American tribe, and that
I5:
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the
California Register of Historical Resources,
or in a local register of historical resources X YES NO as defined in Public Resources Code
section 5020. 1( k), or
ii) A resource determined by the lead
agency, in its discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be significant
pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision
c) of Public Resources Code Section

X YES NO
5024. 1. In applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision ( c) of Public Resource Code
Section 5024. 1, the lead agency shall
consider the significance of the resource to
a California Native American tribe.

18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS.

Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment
requirements of the applicable Regional X YES NO
Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of
new water or wastewater treatment
facilities or expansion of existing facilities,

X YES NO
the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of
new storm water drainage facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the X YES NO
construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available
to serve the project from existing X YES NO
entitlements and resources, or are new or
expanded entitlements needed?
FinalI December2017 11 AppendixA- Modified Initial Study Checklist

City Council
14 –
93 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements - ProjectNo. 17-6883

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
FinalI December2017 12 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial StudyChecklist New Impacts ofProposed Premous FEISIEIR
Project Changes
No Less Than Less Than Potentially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required?
Mitigabon
e) Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it has X YES NO
adequate capacity to serve the project' s
projected demand in addition to the
provider' s existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient
permitted capacity to accommodate the X YES NO
project' s solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local
statutes and regulations related to solid X YES NO
waste?

19. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE. Responses to the
following questions are discussed in
Chapter 3.
a) Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality ofthe environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or X YES NO
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important
examples ofthe major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (" Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when

X YES NO
viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental

X YES NO
effects which will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
Note N/ A- Not applicable

19. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063( c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets:
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.

FinalI December2017 12 AppendixA - Mod ifiedInitial Study Checklist

City Council
14 –
94 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements - ProjectNo. 17-6883

MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST
New Impacts of Proposed Premous FEISIEIR
Project Changes
No Less Than LessTban Poterdially Impacts Subsequent or Impact Significant Significant Significant Disclosed? Supplemental EIR Impact After 1990 Impact Required?
Mitigation
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are " Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project.

Responses to this section are discussed further in Chapter 3.

FinalI December2017 13 AppendixA - Modified Initial StudyChecklist

City Council
14 –
95 2/17/2026

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM
Bristol StreetandMemory LaneIntersection Improvements - ProjectNo. 17-6883 This page intentionally left blank.

FinalI December2017 14 AppendixA - Modified Initial StudyChecklist

City Council
14 –
96 2/17/2026

&,7<2)6$17$$1$)<&,3
&$3,7$/,03529(0(17352-(&7:25.6+((7
352-(&7'(6&5,37,21

7KHSURSRVHGLPSURYHPHQWVZRXOGLQYROYHWKHZLGHQLQJRI%ULVWRO 6WUHHWMXVWQRUWKRI0HPRU\/DQHWRDFFRPPRGDWHDQDGGLWLRQDO WKURXJKVRXWKERXQGODQH$GGLWLRQDOO\WKHSURSRVHGLPSURYHPHQWV ZRXOGLQFOXGHWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQRIVLGHZDONFXUEDQGJXWWHU SDYHPHQWVLJQDOPRGLILFDWLRQDQGFXUEUDPSV
352-(&71(('

%ULVWRO6WUHHWQRUWKRI0HPRU\/DQHKDVWKUHHVRXWKERXQGODQHVH[FHSW DWWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQZKHUHRQO\WZRVRXWKERXQGDQGRQHULJKWWXUQODQH H[LVW$QDGGLWLRQDOVRXWKERXQGWKURXJKODQHLVQHHGHGWRFRPSOHWHWKH &LW\
VSODQWRZLGHQ%ULVWRO6WUHHWIURP:DUQHU$YHQXHWR0HPRU\/DQH RQWKHQRUWKZKLFKZDVDSSURYHGE\&LW\&RXQFLOLQ

DQGUH
HYDOXDWHGLQ
352-(&77,7/(

%ULVWRO6WUHHWDQG0HPRU\/DQH
,QWHUVHFWLRQ:LGHQLQJ
352-(&7&$7(*25<

6WUHHW,PSURYHPHQWV
6WUHHW%ULGJH,PSURYHPHQWV 
:LGHQLQJ
/2&$7,210$3
$*(1&<
&217$&7
'$7(

3XEOLF:RUNV
',9,6,21

&,3(QJLQHHULQJ .HQQ\1JX\HQ6HQLRU&LYLO(QJLQHHU -XO\ 352-(&7&2676 )< )< )< )< )< )< )< &RQVWUXFWLRQ  
727$/  
6285&(2))81'6 )< )< )< )< )< )< )< 00
,&(  
727$/  

EXHIBIT 2

City Council
14 –
97 2/17/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 23/24CIP

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The proposed improvements would involve the widening of Bristol Street just north of Memory Lane to accommodate an additional through southbound lane. Additionally, the proposed improvements would include the construction of sidewalk, curb and gutter, pavement, signal modification, and curb ramps.

PROJECT NEED:

Bristol Street north of Memory Lane has three southbound lanes except at the intersection where only two southbound and one right turn lane exist. An additional southbound through lane is needed to complete the City's plan to widen Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane on the north, which was approved by City Council in 1990 and re- evaluated in 2001.

PROJECT TITLE:

Bristol St & Memory Ln Intersection
Widening
PROJECT CATEGORY:

Street Improvements
Street/Bridge Improvements &
Widening

LOCATION MAP
AGENCY: DIVISION: CONTACT:

Public Works CIP En gineering Jason Gabriel, Principal Civil Engineer PROJECT COSTS FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Construction 4 8 9 , 4 0 0------
Right-Of-Way -------
TOTAL 4 8 9 , 4 0 0------
SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30

GAS TAX -------
MEASURE M2 COMPETITIVE 4 8 9 , 4 0 0------

TSIA AREA F -------
TOTAL 4 8 9 , 4 0 0------
16 City Council
14 –
98 2/17/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 21/22CIP

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The proposed improvements would involve the widening of Bristol Street just north of Memory Lane to accommodate an additional through southbound lane. Additionally, the proposed improvements would include the construction of sidewalk, curb and gutter, pavement, signal modification, and curb ramps.

PROJECT NEED:

Bristol Street north of Memory Lane has three southbound lanes except at the intersection where only two southbound and one right turn lane exist. An additional southbound through lane is needed to complete the City's plan to widen Bristol Street from Warner Avenue to Memory Lane on the north, which was approved by City Council in 1990 and re- evaluated in 2001.

PROJECT TITLE:

Bristol Street and Memory Lane
Intersection Widening
PROJECT CATEGORY:

Street Improvements
Street/Bridge Improvements &
Widening

LOCATION MAP
AGENCY: CONTACT: DATE:

Public Works
DIVISION:

CIP Engineering Kenny Nguyen, Senior Civil Engineer 07-May-2021 PROJECT COSTS FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 Construction 400,000 - - - - - -
TOTAL 400,000 - - - - - -
SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 GAS TAX 400,000 - - - - - -
TOTAL 400,000 - - - - - -
11 City Council
14 –
99 2/17/2026

City Council
14 –
100
2/17/2026

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 15
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
February 17, 2026
TOPIC: Award of a Construction Contract to Construct the Fire Station 71 Fuel Station Replacement Project

AGENDA TITLE
Award of a Construction Contract to GEMS Environmental Management Services, Inc. to Construct the Fire Station 71 Fuel Station Replacement Project (Project No. 24-6054) (General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Capital Improvement Program to include an additional $935,150 in construction funds for the Fire Station 71 Fuel Station Replacement Project (Project No. 24-6054).

2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $935,150, which includes $748,120 for the construction contract, $112,218 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and $74,812 for unanticipated or unforeseen work.

3. Award a construction contract to GEMS Environmental Management Services, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $748,120, subject to change orders, for construction of the Fire Station 71 Fuel Station Replacement Project (Project No. 24-6054), for a term beginning February 17, 2026 and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.

4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER-2026-15 will be filed for Project No. 24-6054.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency (PWA) is responsible for the maintenance and improvement of City facilities, including ten fire stations occupied by the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA). In coordination with OCFA, staff assessed all Santa Ana fire stations and prioritized repairs and improvements.

City Council
15 –
1 2/17/2026

Construction Contract to Construct the Fire Station 71 Fuel Station Replacement Project February 17, 2026