Santa Ana City Council
August 4, 2026

55C0115/AAAL/65718
6 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Bridge Inspection Report
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
Bridge Number : 55C0115

0.3 MI S/O MEMORY LANE
02/01/2021
STRUCTURE NAME:

Location :

Inspection Date :

SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL
Inspection Type
Routine
X

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
Year Built :

Year Modified:

Length (m) :

No. of Joints :
1947 Skew (degrees):

No. of Hinges :
2003

31.1 5
Structure Description:Simply supported 3-span steel girders (7 each at span 2 & and 6 each at spans 1 and 3) with RC pier walls and RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments, foundation type unknown.

West widening: Simply supported 3-span PC/PS concrete I-girders (5 each) with RC pier walls and with RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments, all supported upon driven Class 70C piles.

East widening: Simply supported 3-span PC/PS concrete I-girders (3 each) with RC pier walls and with RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments with monolithic wingwalls, all supported upon driven Class 70C piles.

Span Configuration :(S) 22.75 feet, 52.10 feet, 22.75 feet (N).

SAFE LOAD CAPACITY AND RATINGS
Design Live Load:

Inventory Rating:

Operating Rating:

Calculation Method:

Calculation Method:

M-13.5 OR H-15
RF= 0.91
RF= 1.18
(LRFR) LD & RES FACT RATING
(LRFR) LD & RES FACT RATING
Deck X-Section: (W) 1.00 foot br, 7.00 feet sw, 72.00 feet, 7.00 feet sw, 1.00 foot br (E).

Total Width: Net Width: No. of Lanes:

Rail Code:

Channel Description: Natural earth trapezoidal with rock slopes through the site.

30.5 25.7 4
1000
0 4
m m
Facility Carried: BRISTOL ST
City : SANTA ANA
Min. Vertical Clearance: Unimpaired
FC Underwater Special Other

SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure. Bridge deck was inspected by

INSPECTION COMMENTARY
Permit Rating :

Posting Load : Type 3: Type 3S2: Type 3-3:Legal

DESCRIPTION ON STRUCTURE
Legal Legal
PPPPP
Speed: 45 mph
The bridge inspection condition assessment used for this inspection is based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Bridge Element Inspection Manual 2013 as defined in Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) federal law. The new element inspection methodology may result in changes to related condition and appraisal ratings on the bridge without significant physical changes at the bridge.

The element condition information contained in this report represents the current condition of the bridge based on the most recent routine and special inspections. Some of the notes presented below may be from an inspection that occurred prior to the date noted in this report. Refer to the Scope and Access section of this inspection report for a description of which portions of the bridge were inspected on this date.

NOTICE

DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
Overlay Thickness: 0.0 inches
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 73 8/4/2026
Printed on: Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM

55C0115/AAAL/65718
6 walking on shoulder and median area. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge.

There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure.

The channel is dry at the time of inspsection.

REVISIONS
The entire quantity of RC abutments ELI #215 is modified from 203.0 feet to 262.0 feet because the wingwalls are monolithic with the abutments.

DECK AND ROADWAY
AC roadway is at both approach and departure lanes.

Polyester Concrete Overlay was only done on lanes 1 of each direction for areas of the original bridge deck and the center median approximately 45.0 feet wide, 100.0 feet long with Methacrylate treatment.

The widening bridge deck has longitudinal and transverse hairline cracks up to 0.05 inches wide throughout the entire bridge deck.

There are transverse cracks up to 0.05 inches wide with heavy white and brown efflorescence inside the original bays 6 to 9 of all spans (see the attached photo no. 9).

Type A pourable seal has been deteriorating and losing all its adhesion.

SUPERSTRUCTURE
Only the bottom and the top flanges of all steel girders were painted in between span 2; and the painting system of superstructure is in fair condition but the webs need to be painted.

About 50.0 percent of the restrainer cables are rusted.

SUBSTRUCTURE
The northerly abutment has an incipient spall at (12.0 inches L x 5.0 inches W) at the top of bay 3 (counting from east, see the attached photo no. 6).

The northerly abutment has three vertical cracks from 0.05 to 0.07 inches wide (see the attached photo no. 5).

Along all the footing of pier walls are placed and protected with rocks, boulders / riprap.

SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
The load rating for this structure is calculated on 09/08/2016 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 09/08/2016.

INSPECTION COMMENTARY
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 74 8/4/2026
Printed on: Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM

55C0115/AAAL/65718
6 Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4
Qty in each Condition State
12 107
109
182
210
215
Deck-RC
Efflorescence/Rust Staining
Cracking (RC and Other)
Concrete Coat.(Meth/Paint/Seal)
Girder/Beam-Steel
Steel Coating-Paint
Girder/Beam-PS Conc.

EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
Corrosion
Pier Wall-RC
Abutment-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 948
150
75 426
201
150
240
4 2
62 80
1 2
sq.m
each
each
sq.m
m
sq.m
m
ea.
each
m
m
each
each
723
0 0
426
201
150
240
3 1
62 77
0 0
150
100
50 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
1 0
1 75
50 25
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND COMMENTARY
Defect
/Prot
1120
1130
521
515
1000
1080
1130
Defect
(12-1120)
There are transverse hairline cracks up to 0.04 inches wide with light to heavy white; and brown efflorescence inside the original bays #6 to #9 of all spans (see the attached photo no. 9). (12-1130)
The widening deck has random longitudinal and transverse hairline cracks up to 0.06 inches wide throughout the entire bridge deck.
(12-521)
The Asphalt Slurry was placed over an area of the original bridge deck (two lanes #1 of each bound traffic and the center median approximately 45.0 feet wide, 100.0 feet long) with Methacrylate treatment.
(107)
There were no significant defects noted.
(107-515)
Only the bottom flange and the top flange of all steel girders were painted in between span #2. The paint system of the girders is in fair condition.
(109)
There were no significant defects noted.
(182)
Minor corrosion.
(182-1000)
About 50.0 percent of the restrainer cables are rusted. (210)
There were no significant defects noted.
(215)
Monolithic wingwalls are included in the total quantity. It has a spall, cracks. (215-1080)
The northerly abutment has an incipient spall at (12.0 inches L X 5.0 inches W) at the top of bay #3 (counting from east, see the attached photo no. 6).
(215-1130)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 75 8/4/2026
Printed on: Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM

55C0115/AAAL/65718
6 WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By:

Work By:

Work By:

Action :

Action :

Action :

EstCost:

EstCost:

EstCost:

RecDate:

RecDate:

RecDate:

LOCAL AGENCY

LOCAL AGENCY

LOCAL AGENCY
Appr. Roadway-Repair
Paint Misc. Activity
Deck-Methacrylate
02/01/2021
02/01/2021
02/20/2019
StrTarget:

StrTarget:

StrTarget:
2 YEARS
2 YEARS
2 YEARS
Repave AC roadway at the approach and
departure lanes due to settlement behind
abutment locations.

Full preparation to paint all steel
girder webs those have been left out. In
addition, remove and clean all rust from
the EQ Restrainer Cables before paint
them.

Seal deck cracks with Methacrylate only
widening section on both directions
(approximately 70.0% of bridge deck need
to be sealed) .

DistTarget:

DistTarget:

DistTarget:

EA:

EA:

EA:

Status :

Status :

Status :

PROPOSED

PROPOSED

PROPOSED
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4
Qty in each Condition State
220
226
301
312
331
Pile Cap/Footing-RC
Pile-PS Conc.

Joint-Pourable Seal
Seal Adhesion (Joints)
Seal Damage (Joints)
Bearing-Enclosed
Railing-RC
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 20
1 86
25 30
4 60
m
ea.
m
each
each
each
m
20 1
31 0
0 4
60 0
0 25
25 0
0 0
0 0
30 0
30 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0

ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND COMMENTARY
Defect
/Prot
2320
2330
Defect
The northerly abutment has three vertical cracks from 0.05 to 0.07 inches wide (see the attached photo no. 5).
(220)
There were no significant defects noted.
(226)
The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. (301)
The pourable joint seals are located only at lane #2 from each direction (widening portion only) and they are deteriorated and cracked throughout.
(301-2320)
The pourable joint seals are partially failed and lost adhesion, debris was noticed inside the joint. (301-2330)
The seal of the joints are failed in many locations.
(312)
This element is included to indicate the presence of bearings on this structure. The bearings were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of bearing distress was noted in any superstructure element.
(331)
There were no significant defects noted.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 76 8/4/2026
Printed on: Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM

55C0115/AAAL/65718
6 Team Leader : Nelson N. Vo
Side : Upstream X-Section Date: 02/01/2021
Measured From :Top of deck

2.45 4.90

4.95 4.90

2.90 Vert(m)
Face of abutment 1
Northerly face of pier 2
Span 2, thalweg
Southerly face of pier 3
Face of abutment 4
Abutment 1 (South)
Location

CHANNEL X-SECTION
Horiz(m) Comments

0.00 6.50

14.00 21.50

43.50 WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By:

Action :

RecDate: EstCost:

LOCAL AGENCY
Joints-Replace
02/20/2019
StrTarget: 2 YEARS
Replace all Type A seal at all locations
on bridge deck.

DistTarget:

Status : PROPOSED EA:

No. 27141
03/31/2021
Edwin
Mah
CIVIL
Report Author : Nelson N. Vo
Inspected By : NN.Vo/E.Mah
3/19/2021
Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer) (Date)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 77 8/4/2026
Printed on: Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM

55C0115/AAAL/65718
059
12 069

0.3 MI S/O MEMORY LANE
69000
55C0115

BRISTOL ST

SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL
0 33 DEG 46 MIN 09.87 SEC
117 DEG 53 MIN 04.89 SEC
(99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER
(98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE
(3) COUNTY CODE
(2) HIGHWAY AGENCY DISTRICT
(1) STATE NAME- CALIFORNIA
(9) LOCATION-
(4) PLACE CODE
(8) STRUCTURE NUMBER
(7) FACILITY CARRIED-
(6) FEATURE INTERSECTED-
(11) MILEPOINT/KILOMETERPOINT
(16) LATITUDE
(17) LONGITUDE
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE(ON/UNDER)-
**************** IDENTIFICATION ***************
(21) MAINTAIN- 04
(37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE- 5
(112) NBIS BRIDGE LENGTH- Y
(22) OWNER- 04
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE- N
(103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE-
(100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY- 0
(26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS- 14
(104) HIGHWAY SYSTEM- 1
(20) TOLL- 3
(102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC- 2
(110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK - 0
************* CLASSIFICATION ************* CODE
(61) CHANNEL & CHANNEL PROTECTION 8
(62) CULVERTS N
(58) DECK 5
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE 7
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE 7
**************** CONDITION **************** CODE
(31) DESIGN LOAD- 2
(66) INVENTORY RATING- RF= 0.91
(65) INVENTORY RATING METHOD- 8
(64) OPERATING RATING- RF= 1.18
(63) OPERATING RATING METHOD- 8
(70) BRIDGE POSTING- 5
(41) STRUCTURE OPEN, POSTED OR CLOSED- A
********* LOAD RATING AND POSTING ********* CODE
(46) NUMBER OF APPROACH SPANS 0
(45) NUMBER OF SPANS IN MAIN UNIT 3
TYPE- 02
B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE- 0
C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION- 0
(107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE- 1
A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE- 1
3 (43) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN:MATERIAL-
(108) WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM:
******** STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL *********
*************** AGE AND SERVICE ***************
(42) TYPE OF SERVICE: ON- 5
UNDER- 5
(27) YEAR BUILT 1947
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED 2003
(29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 55000
(30) YEAR OF ADT 2021
(19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM
(28) LANES:ON STRUCTURE 04
(109) TRUCK ADT 1 %
(105) FED.LANDS HWY- 0
(13) LRS INVENTORY ROUTE & SUBROUTE 000000000000
(12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK- 1
**************** APPRAISAL **************** CODE
0 (72) APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT 8
0 (68) DECK GEOMETRY 9
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES 1
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES 5
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION 7
0 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES, VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL N
(71) WATER ADEQUACY 9
(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M
(55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF- 0.0 M
(48) LENGTH OF MAXIMUM SPAN 15.1 M
(35) STRUCTURE FLARED NO
(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY 99.99 M
(54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF- 0.00 M
(32) APPROACH ROADWAY WIDTH (W/SHOULDERS) 25.7 M
(116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERT CLEAR M
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL- N
(40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M
(39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M
(111) PIER PROTECTION-
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN- 0
(52) DECK WIDTH OUT TO OUT 30.5 M
(50) CURB OR SIDEWALK: LEFT 2.1 M RIGHT 2.1 M
(34) SKEW 5 DEG
*************** GEOMETRIC DATA ****************
*************** NAVIGATION DATA ***************
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH 31.1 M
(51) BRIDGE ROADWAY WIDTH CURB TO CURB 25.7 M
********** PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS **********
***********************************************
(94) BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT COST
(95) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT COST
(96) TOTAL PROJECT COST
(114) FUTURE ADT 81501
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2041
SUFFICIENCY RATING = 90.1
*************** INSPECTIONS ***************
(92) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION: (93) CFI DATE
(76) LENGTH OF STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT
(97) YEAR OF IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE
(75) TYPE OF WORK-
(47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 25.7 M
(10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M

A) FRACTURE CRIT DETAIL- NO MO A)

C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP- NO MO C)

B) UNDERWATER INSP- NO MO B)
150000000

PART OF NET

ON FREE ROAD

CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY

CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY

NOT ELIGIBLE
YES

OTHER PRIN ART URBAN

NOT STRAHNET

ROUTE ON NHS

NONE EXISTS
2 WAY

NOT APPLICABLE

NOT ON NET
M-13.5 OR H-15
(LRFR) LD & RES FA
(LRFR) LD & RES FA

EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL LOADS

DESCRIPTION- OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

NOT APPLICABLE

NO MEDIAN

HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

WATERWAY

CONCRETE
NONE
NONE

CIP CONCRETE
(90) INSPECTION DATE (91) FREQUENCY
TYPE-
(44) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR:MATERIALSTRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR GDR STEEL

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL REPORT
% SHARE %

OTHER/NA
OTHER/NA 000
MO
ON
CODE
CODE
CODE
CODE
CODE
CODE
UNDER STRUCTURE 00

NOT H/RR
CODE
CODE
CODE
02/21 24
PAINT CONDITION INDEX = 100.0
M

NOT H/RR
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 78 8/4/2026
California Department of Transportation
Division of Maintenance
Structure Maintenance and Investigations
BRIDGE

INSPECTION

RECORDS

INFORMATION
SYSTEM
The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS.

These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual.

Records for “Confidential” bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 79 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM Page 1 of 55C0372/AAAK/102829 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Routine-Roadway View (02/12/2019) Routine-Elevation View (02/12/2019) Routine-Underside View (02/12/2019)

PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
LOCATION 0.6 MI E/O HARBOR BLVD
TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo
FACILITY CARRIED 5TH STREET
No.

REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo

FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL

BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
LATITUDE 33°44'55.78"
Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer)
INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah

CULVERT N N/A (NBI)
DECK 7 GOOD
SUBSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD
SUPERSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD SUFFICIENCY RATING 41.0

STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
1,901

PAINT CONDITION N/A

STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
STRUCTURE EVALUATION 2 INTOLERABLE - REPLACE
LONGITUDE 117°54'34.27"
SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING
INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) ON 150000000
POSTMILE 0

ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM NOT ON NHS
(9)
(11)
(16)
(17)
(7)
(6)
(5)
(104)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(62)
(67) (113)
Routine Inspection

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Edwin
Mah
03/31/2025
CIVIL
27141
9/11/2023
Date
Exp.

BRIDGE NO.:
55C0372
STRUCTURE NAME:

SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL February 8, 2023
INSPECTION DATE:

DECK AREA (M) 2
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 80 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM Page 2 of 55C0372/AAAK/102829 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Continuous 7-span CIP/RC T-girder (8 each) with RC pier walls and RC open end seat abutments, all supported upon concrete piles.

Widening: South and north overhangs were widenined.
(W) 36.0 feet, 5 @ 48.9 feet, 36.0 feet (E).

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION

SPAN CONFIGURATION
(55)ORANGE
12 (69000) SANTA ANA

BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER

BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE

COUNTY CODE

HIGHWAY DISTRICT

STATE NAME

PLACE CODE
% SHARE

AGENCY INFORMATION

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION

YEAR BUILT

YEAR MODIFIED

LENGTH (M)
JOINTS
1962
SKEW
NO. OF HINGES
2010

97.5 26
3 2

MAIN SPANS
APPR SPANS 0
7 LOAD CAPACITY

DESIGN LOAD

INVENTORY RATING

OPERATING RATING

CALC METHOD

CALC METHOD
5 MS 18 (HS 20)
RF= 0.31
RF= 0.47
8 LRFR RATING FACTOR
8 LRFR RATING FACTOR

PERMIT RATING

POSTING LOADS
Legal
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Legal
Legal
XXXXX
MAX SPAN (M) 14.9
Unimpaired 99.99 M

MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE STR FLARE 0-NO

NBIS BR LENGTH Y
STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 2: CONCRETE CONT
DESIGN TYPE MAIN 04: TEE BEAM
STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE

BRIDGE POSTING

STRUCTURE STATUS
(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M
(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF 0.0 M (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF 0.00 M
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS

A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

N-NOT H/RR

N-NOT H/RR

INSPECTION INFORMATION
CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE

NSTM INSP N-NO MO A)

OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MO C)

UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B)
INSPECTION DATE 02/23 (91) FREQUENCY 24 MO
MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
Safe
Loads
N/A
N/A
N/A
Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
Posting
Signs
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
Speed 35 N/A N/A MPH
Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements
Additional Signs
Load Rating Summary Date
Load Rating Type
09/30/22
CALIFORNIA 069

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Posting Date N/A
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(21)
(22)
(98)
(99)
(90)
(92)
A)
B)
C)
(27)
(106)
(34)
(49)
(112)
(45)
(46)
(48)
(35)
(43a)
(43b)
(44a)
(44b)
(31)
(66)
(64)
(41)
(65)
(63)
(70)

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches
Load Rating Tool - Date BrR 7.2.0 AASHTO - 09/13/22
Calculated
N/A

STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
NONE
NONE
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 81 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM Page 3 of 55C0372/AAAK/102829 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS

SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure.

Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder and median area. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge.

The channel is dry.

There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure. Rain boots maybe needed if it is in raining season.

REVISIONS
The inspection frequency was modified from 24 months to 48 months.

DECK AND ROADWAY
Polyester Deck Overlay is in good condition.

There are random transverse soffit cracks with white and brown efflorescence in all bays of spans 1, 2, 6 and 7.

AC Roadway started deteriorating at both of approach and departure lanes mainly along the edge of travel way.

Both abutment joints were filled partially with debris and sand.

Both sidewalks have map cracks up to 0.05 inches wide and 8.0 inches in spacing.

SUPERSTRUCTURE
Northerly girder of span 7 has a small spall at (2.0 inches L X 2.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) at 10.0 feet from the easterly abutment.

SUBSTRUCTURE
Pier wall 3 has two spalls at (20.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 4.0 inches D) under the northerly girder, westerly fascia; and an unsound concrete at (15.0 inches L X 4.0 feet) at top of the footing cap approximately 8.0 feet above the ground at the westerly face.

The following is the locations of pier wall 5 with cracks and spalls:

There is a spall at (18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D) at the south end.

There are an unsound concrete area at (8.0 inches L X 2.0 feet W) under the northerly girder; and the other area is about (8.0 inches L X 3.0 feet W) under the northerly girder right above the footing cap.

Pier wall 2 has a vertical crack 0.05 inches wide and 5.0 feet long.

Pierwall 3 has a vertical crack 0.05 wide and 6.0 feet long at the northerly end.

Pier wall 4 has a vertical crack 0.05 inches wide and 6.0 feet long.

Pier wall 6 has a spall at (18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D) at the southerly end.

SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
The load rating for this structure is calculated on 04/06/2013 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 04/06/2013.

INSPECTION COMMENTARY
- NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

CONDITION INFORMATION

SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 82 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM Page 4 of 55C0372/AAAK/102829 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 TYPE OF MEMBRANE

TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION

DECK STRUCTURE TYPE

TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE

WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 13000
YEAR OF ADT 2023
BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM
(109) TRUCK ADT % 1 %
FUTURE ADT 27788
YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2041
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
1-CONCRETE
0-NONE
0-NONE
1-CIP CONCRETE

DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION

19.5 M

15.8 M

DECK AND ROADWAY
LANES 4
35 0-NOT ON NHS

PARALLEL STRUCTURE

TEMPORARY STRUCTURE

DEFENSE HIGHWAY

FUNCTIONAL CLASS
SPEED

NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
TOLL

DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC

DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK

TYPE OF SERVICE

FEDERAL LANDS HWY
APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIA
DECK GEOMETRY 4 TOLERABLE
APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 19.2 M

BRIDGE MEDIAN
CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 0.8 M RIGHT 0.8 M

TOTAL WIDTH

NET WIDTH
INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 15.8 M
INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M
3-ON FREE ROAD
16-MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN
0-NOT STRAHNET

N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
0-NOT APPLICABLE
0-NOT ON NET
0 NO MEDIAN
5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
(N) 1.0 foot br, 5.0 feet sw, 51.8 feet, 5.0 feet sw, 1.0 foot br (S).

DECK CROSS SECTION

LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
OVERLAY THICKNESS (inches) 0 inches
N/A
(51)
(52)
(50)
(32)
(33)
(107)
(108)
A)
B)
C)
(29)
(30)
(19)
(114)
(115)
(37)
(42a)
(12)
(13)
(104)
(26)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(10)
(47)
(68)
(72)
(105)
(110)
(20)
(28a)
(103)
(49) LENGTH 97.5 M
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition State
16 Top Flange-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
Deck Wearing Surface-Concrete
2 2
2 1710
100
1540
sq.m
each
sq.m
1610
0 1540
100
100
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Defect/
Prot
1130
511
Defect
(16-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(16-511) Deck Wearing Surface-Concrete
There are random transverse soffit cracks up to 0.05 inches wide and 10.0 to 14.0 inches long with white and brown efflorescence in all bays of spans 1, 2, 6 and 7.

There were no significant defects noted.
(58) DECK RATING =7
(36a) Rail Code 1 0 0 0
301
304
Joint-Pourable Seal
Debris Impaction (Joints)
Joint-Open Expansion
2 2
2 44
10 98
m
each
m
34 0
98 10
10 0
0 0
0 0
0 0

JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES 2350

RAIL INFORMATION
(36b) Transition (36c) Appr Guardrail (36d) Appr Guardrail End Roadway Speed 35 MPH

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(301-2350) Debris Impaction (Joints)
(304) Joint-Open Expansion
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
Both abutment hinge joint locations were filled partially with debris and sand.

There were no significant defects noted.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 83 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM Page 5 of 55C0372/AAAK/102829 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE

CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
Concrete lined trapezoidal with bike/maintenance path under end spans.

TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER

UNDERCLEARANCES V - H N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI)
WATER ADEQUACY 9 ABOVE DESIRABLE

VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR M

NAVIGATION CONTROL
NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M
NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M

PIER PROTECTION
5-WATERWAY N: NOT APPLICABLE
SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING

SCOUR POA DATE N/A
CHANNEL PROTECTION 9 NO DEFICIENCIES
N/A
(42b)
(69)
(71)
(61)
(113)
(38)
(111)
(39)
(116)
(40)
110
182
312
Girder/Beam-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
Bearing-Enclosed
2 2
2 2
780
1 16
4 m
each
ea.
each
779
0 16
4 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
1080
210 Pier Wall-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 117
4 4
m
each
each
109
0 0
4 0
4 4
4 0

SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 0
0 1080
1130

SUPERSTRUCTURE

SUBSTRUCTURE
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING = 7
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE RATING = 7
(110-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(182) EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
(312) Bearing-Enclosed
(210-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
Pierwall 3 has two spalls at (20.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 4.0 inches D) under the northerly girder, westerly fascia; and an unsound concrete at (15.0 inches L X 4.0 feet) at top of the footing cap approximately 8.0 feet above the ground at the westerly face.

The following is the locations of pier wall 5 with cracks and spalls:

There is a spall at (18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D) at the south end.

There are an unsound concrete area at (8.0 inches L X 2.0 feet W) under the northerly girder; and the other area is about (8.0 inches L X 3.0 feet W) under the northerly girder right above the footing cap.

Northerly girder of span 7 has a small spall at (2.0 inches L X 2.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) at 10.0 feet from the easterly abutment.

There were no significant defects noted.

There were no significant defects noted.
331 Railing-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
196
5 m
each
191
0 5
5 0
0 0
0 JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES 1130

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(331-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
There are several vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long inside of both rails.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 84 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM Page 6 of 6 55C0372/AAAK/102829 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Action
Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost
Sub-Patch spalls
02/13/2019
Str Target ROUTINE
Sawcut, remove all loose material around the areas before patching all the concrete spalls as following locations below:

Pier wall 3 has two spalls at (20.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 4.0 inches D) under the northerly girder, westerly fascia; and an unsound concrete at (15.0 inches L X 4.0 feet) at top of the footing cap approximately 8.0 feet above the ground at the westerly face.

There is a spall at (18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D) at the south end.

There are an unsound concrete area at (8.0 inches L X 2.0 feet W) under the northerly girder; and the other area is about (8.0 inches L X 3.0 feet W) under the northerly girder right above the footing cap.

Dist Target
Status PROPOSED EA

DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
215
227
256
Abutment-RC
Pile-RC
Slope Protection
2 2
2 39
1 2
m
ea.
ea.
39 1
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 0
0 SUBSTRUCTURE
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE RATING = 7

WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
(210-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(210-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(215) Abutment-RC
(227) Pile-RC
(256) Slope Protection
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
Pier wall 6 has a spall at (18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D) at the southerly end.

Pier wall 2 has a vertical crack 0.05 inches wide.

Pierwall 3 has a vertical crack 0.05 wide at the northerly end.

Pier wall 4 has a vertical crack 0.05 inches wide.

There were no significant defects noted.

The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element.

There were no significant defects noted.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 85 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 86 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 87 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 88 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 89 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 90 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 91 8/4/2026
55C0372
100 - Routine-Roadway View
Feb 12, 2019 [AAAJ]
Deckview looking east
Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 92 8/4/2026
55C0372
101 - Routine-Elevation View
Feb 12, 2019 [AAAJ]
Elevation looking northeast
Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 93 8/4/2026
55C0372
114 - Sub-Details
Feb 12, 2019 [AAAJ]
Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 94 8/4/2026
55C0372
103 - Deck-Details
Feb 12, 2019 [AAAJ]
Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 95 8/4/2026
55C0372
101 - Routine-Elevation View
Feb 12, 2019 [AAAJ]
Elevation looking southeast
Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 96 8/4/2026
55C0372
101 - Routine-Elevation View
Feb 12, 2019 [AAAJ]
Elevation looking south, downstream
Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 97 8/4/2026
55C0372
135 - Routine-Underside View
Feb 12, 2019 [AAAJ]
Transverse soffit cracks with efflorescence
Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 98 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 99 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 100 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 101 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 102 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 103 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 104 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 105 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 106 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 107 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 108 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 109 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 110 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 111 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 112 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 113 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 114 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 115 8/4/2026
California Department of Transportation
Division of Maintenance
Structure Maintenance and Investigations
BRIDGE

INSPECTION

RECORDS

INFORMATION
SYSTEM
The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS.

These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual.

Records for “Confidential” bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 116 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page 1 of 55C0047/AAAL/102827 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Routine-Roadway View (02/13/2019) Routine-Elevation View (02/13/2019) Routine-Underside View (02/20/2015)

PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
LOCATION 0.3 MI N SANTA CLARA AVE
TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo

FACILITY CARRIED FLOWER ST
No.

REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo

FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL

BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
LATITUDE 33°46'13.83"
Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer)
INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah

CULVERT N N/A (NBI)
DECK 5 FAIR
SUBSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD
SUPERSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD SUFFICIENCY RATING 92.4

STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
705

PAINT CONDITION N/A

STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
STRUCTURE EVALUATION 7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIA
LONGITUDE 117°52'33.61"
SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING
INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) ON 150000000
POSTMILE 0

ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM NOT ON NHS
(9)
(11)
(16)
(17)
(7)
(6)
(5)
(104)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(62)
(67) (113)
Routine Inspection

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Edwin
Mah
03/31/2025
CIVIL
27141
9/11/2023
Date
Exp.

BRIDGE NO.:
55C0047
STRUCTURE NAME:

SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL February 7, 2023
INSPECTION DATE:

DECK AREA (M) 2
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 117 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page 2 of 55C0047/AAAL/102827 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Simply supported 4-span CIP/RC T-girder (11 each) with RC pier walls and RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments, all supported on spread footings.
(S) 4 @ 36.0 feet (N).

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION

SPAN CONFIGURATION
(55)ORANGE
12 (69000) SANTA ANA

BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER

BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE

COUNTY CODE

HIGHWAY DISTRICT

STATE NAME

PLACE CODE
% SHARE

AGENCY INFORMATION

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
N/A

YEAR BUILT

YEAR MODIFIED

LENGTH (M)
JOINTS
1930
SKEW
NO. OF HINGES

44.5 45
5 0

MAIN SPANS
APPR SPANS 0
4 LOAD CAPACITY

DESIGN LOAD

INVENTORY RATING

OPERATING RATING

CALC METHOD

CALC METHOD
4 M 18 (H 20)
RF= 1.10
RF= 1.48
8 LRFR RATING FACTOR
8 LRFR RATING FACTOR

PERMIT RATING

POSTING LOADS
Legal
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Legal
Legal
PPPPP
MAX SPAN (M) 11
Unimpaired 99.99 M

MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE STR FLARE 0-NO

NBIS BR LENGTH Y
STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 1: CONCRETE
DESIGN TYPE MAIN 04: TEE BEAM
STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE

BRIDGE POSTING

STRUCTURE STATUS
(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M
(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF 0.0 M (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF 0.00 M
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS

A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

N-NOT H/RR

N-NOT H/RR

INSPECTION INFORMATION
CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE

NSTM INSP N-NO MO A)

OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MO C)

UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B)
INSPECTION DATE 02/23 (91) FREQUENCY 24 MO
MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
Safe
Loads
N/A
N/A
N/A
Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
Posting
Signs
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
Speed 25 N/A N/A MPH
Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements
Additional Signs
Load Rating Summary Date
Load Rating Type
08/28/15
CALIFORNIA 069

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Posting Date N/A
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(21)
(22)
(98)
(99)
(90)
(92)
A)
B)
C)
(27)
(106)
(34)
(49)
(112)
(45)
(46)
(48)
(35)
(43a)
(43b)
(44a)
(44b)
(31)
(66)
(64)
(41)
(65)
(63)
(70)

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches
Load Rating Tool - Date BrR 6.7.0 AASHTO - 08/28/15
Calculated
N/A

STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
NONE
NONE
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 118 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page 3 of 55C0047/AAAL/102827 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS

SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure.

Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge.

The channel is dry. There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure.

DECK AND ROADWAY
AC Roadway is in good condition at the northerly abutment.

The bridge deck has several small deck spalls scattering throughout the entire deck.

The bridge deck has numerous diagonal deck cracks at each span up to 0.06 inches wide and 16.0 inches in spacing. In addtion, there is an area of bridge deck that has been covered with Asphalt, northerly abutment.

Type A joint seal (1.0 to 1.5 inches gap at 70.0 degrees of Fahrenheit) has been cracking, disbonding completely at both abutment joint locations and hinges, mainly at northerly abutment.

Between bridge and street sidewalks have two triangular spalls (36.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D and 8.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right at the southwest corner of southerly abutment joint location.

Both concrete bridge railings were painted.

PCC approach and departure slabs are fairly new at the southerly abutment location.

The northerly abutment joint seal is covered with AC roadway at the approach.

SUPERSTRUCTURE
There is no notable distress observed at the time of inspection.

SUBSTRUCTURE
There is a debris at pier wall 3 easterly end that has been accumulating in the front at 10.0 feet wide and 5.0 feet deep. In addition, the tree is laying down at easterly end of pier wall 3; and this tree can be a cause of a large hole at this location at (30.0 feet wide x 40.0 feet long x 4.0 feet deep) southeast corner of spans 2 and 3. The work recommendation has been made back in 02/20/2015 but it has not done yet.

SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
The load rating for this structure is calculated on 08/28/2015 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 08/28/2015.

INSPECTION COMMENTARY
- NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

CONDITION INFORMATION

SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 119 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page 4 of 55C0047/AAAL/102827 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 TYPE OF MEMBRANE

TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION

DECK STRUCTURE TYPE

TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE

WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 5500
YEAR OF ADT 2021
BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM
(109) TRUCK ADT % 1 %
FUTURE ADT 10688
YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2041
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
1-CONCRETE
0-NONE
0-NONE
1-CIP CONCRETE

DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION

15.8 M

12.0 M

DECK AND ROADWAY
LANES 2
25 0-NOT ON NHS

PARALLEL STRUCTURE

TEMPORARY STRUCTURE

DEFENSE HIGHWAY

FUNCTIONAL CLASS
SPEED

NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
TOLL

DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC

DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK

TYPE OF SERVICE

FEDERAL LANDS HWY
APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT
DECK GEOMETRY 5 ABOVE TOLERABLE
APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 19.8 M

BRIDGE MEDIAN
CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 1.5 M RIGHT 1.5 M

TOTAL WIDTH

NET WIDTH
INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 12.0 M
INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M
3-ON FREE ROAD
19-LOCAL URBAN
0-NOT STRAHNET

N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
0-NOT APPLICABLE
0-NOT ON NET
0 NO MEDIAN
5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
(W) 1.3 feet br, 5.0 feet sw, 39.3 feet, 5.0 feet sw, 1.3 feet br (E).

DECK CROSS SECTION

LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
OVERLAY THICKNESS (inches) 0 inches
N/A
(51)
(52)
(50)
(32)
(33)
(107)
(108)
A)
B)
C)
(29)
(30)
(19)
(114)
(115)
(37)
(42a)
(12)
(13)
(104)
(26)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(10)
(47)
(68)
(72)
(105)
(110)
(20)
(28a)
(103)
(49) LENGTH 44.5 M
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition State
16 Top Flange-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 703
7 200
sq.m
each
each
496
0 0
207
7 200
0 0
0 0
0 0

DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Defect/
Prot
1080
1130
Defect
(16) Top Flange-RC
(16-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(16-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Deck cracks with numerous minor deck spalls.

The bridge deck has several small deck spalls scattering throughout the entire deck.

The bridge deck has numerous diagonal deck cracks at each span up to 0.05 inches wide, 16.0 inches in spacing.

The bridge deck has random diagonal soffit cracks with white efflorescence inside most bays mainly bays # 2 and #3 throughout all spans.
(58) DECK RATING =5
(36a) Rail Code 1 1 1 0
301 Joint-Pourable Seal
Seal Damage (Joints)
2 2
110
110
m
each
0 0
0 0
40 40
70 70

JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES 2330

RAIL INFORMATION
(36b) Transition (36c) Appr Guardrail (36d) Appr Guardrail End Roadway Speed 25 MPH

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(301) Joint-Pourable Seal
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
Disbonding and cracking.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 120 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page 5 of 55C0047/AAAL/102827 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE

CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
Natural earth trapezoidal with a cobbled earth invert.

TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER

UNDERCLEARANCES V - H N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI)
WATER ADEQUACY 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE

VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR M

NAVIGATION CONTROL
NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M
NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M

PIER PROTECTION
5-WATERWAY N: NOT APPLICABLE
SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING

SCOUR POA DATE N/A
CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 PROTECTED
N/A
(42b)
(69)
(71)
(61)
(113)
(38)
(111)
(39)
(116)
(40)
110
182
Girder/Beam-RC
EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
2 2
489
15 m
ea.
489
15 0
0 0
0 0
0 SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
210
215
Pier Wall-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
Abutment-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
2 2
2 2
66 3
68 1
m
each
m
each
63 0
67 0
3 3
1 1
0 0
0 0

SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 0
0 0
1130
1080

SUPERSTRUCTURE

SUBSTRUCTURE
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING = 7
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE RATING = 7
(110) Girder/Beam-RC
(182) EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
(210-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
Pier wall #2 exhibits three vertical cracks 1.0 mm wide at G #3, #4 and #9.

Pier wall #3 exhibits four vertical cracks 0.5 mm wide.

Pier wall #4 exhibits three vertical cracks 0.5 mm wide.

There were no significant defects noted.

There were no significant defects noted.
321
331
Approach Slab-RC
Railing-RC
2 2
148
90 sq.m
m
148
90 0
0 0
0 0
0 JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(301-2330) Seal Damage (Joints)
(321) Approach Slab-RC
(331) Railing-RC
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
All joints seals of the pourable joints are failed completely.

There were no significant defects noted. Approach and departure slabs are with Asphalt ovelay on top.

There were no significant defects noted.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 121 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM Page 6 of 6 55C0047/AAAL/102827 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
Work By
Action
Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost
Joints-Repair/Clean
10/04/1995
Str Target ROUTINE
Replace the deteriorated Type A joints seal as follows:

South Abutment: Width of joint is 1.75 inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.

Pier wall 2: Width of joint is 0.5 inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.

Pier wall 3: Width of joint is 1.5 inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.

Pier wall 4: Width of joint is 0.5 inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.

North Abutment: Width of joint is 1.75 inch at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.

Dist Target
Status PROPOSED EA
Work By
Action
Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost
Scour-Place Counterm
02/20/2015
Str Target ROUTINE
Remove debris at pier wall 3 easterly end that was accumulated in the front 10.0 feet wide and 5.0 feet deep.

Remove the tree that is laying down at easterly end of pier wall #3; and this tree can be a cause of a large hole at this location 30.0 feet wide x 40.0 feet long x 4.0 feet deep.

Dist Target
Status PROPOSED EA

DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Work By
Action
Action
Est Cost
Est Cost
Rec Date
Rec Date

LOCAL AGENCY

LOCAL AGENCY
Deck-Misc.

Deck-Methacrylate
02/01/2021
02/12/2019
Str Target
Str Target

ROUTINE

ROUTINE
Sawcut, remove all loose material; and then, patch sidewalk spall with cement mortar concrete as the following location below:

Between bridge and street sidewalks have two triangular spalls (36.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D and 8.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right at the southwest corner of southerly abutment joint location.

Prior to seal deck cracks with Methacrylate. Contractors need to clean and patch all deck spalls.

Dist Target
Dist Target
EA
EA
Status
Status

PROPOSED

PROPOSED
234 Pier Cap-RC 2 1 m 1 0 0

SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 SUBSTRUCTURE
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE RATING = 7

WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
(215-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(234) Pier Cap-RC
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
North abutment cap exhibits a spall 2.5 X 1 ft X 1 ft, part of this spall should support the westerly girder, therefore bearing area of 6" of an equilateral triangle was lost.

The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. There were no significant defects noted.

MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Action
Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost
Mech/Elect-Misc.
02/01/2021
Str Target ROUTINE
Secure all the electrical conduits right in front of both abutment walls.

Dist Target
Status PROPOSED EA
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 122 8/4/2026
Printed on: Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM

55C0047/AAAK/65718
6 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Bridge Inspection Report
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
Bridge Number : 55C0047

0.3 MI N SANTA CLARA AVE
02/01/2021
STRUCTURE NAME:

Location :

Inspection Date :

SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL
Inspection Type
Routine
X

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
N/A
Year Built :

Year Modified:

Length (m) :

No. of Joints :
1930 Skew (degrees):

44.5 No. of Hinges :
45 Structure Description:Simply supported 4-span CIP/RC T-girder (11 each) with RC pier walls and RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments, all supported on spread footings.

Span Configuration :(S) 4 @ 36.0 feet (N).

SAFE LOAD CAPACITY AND RATINGS
Design Live Load:

Inventory Rating:

Operating Rating:

Calculation Method:

Calculation Method:

M-18 OR H-20
RF= 1.10
RF= 1.48
(LRFR) LD & RES FACT RATING
(LRFR) LD & RES FACT RATING
Deck X-Section: (W) 1.3 feet br, 5.0 feet sw, 39.3 feet, 5.0 feet sw, 1.3 feet br (E).

Total Width: Net Width: No. of Lanes:

Rail Code:

Channel Description: Natural earth trapezoidal with a cobbled earth invert.

15.8 12.0 2
1110
0 5
m m
Facility Carried: FLOWER ST
City : SANTA ANA
Min. Vertical Clearance: Unimpaired
FC Underwater Special Other

SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure. Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge.

The channel is dry at the time of inspection. There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure.

INSPECTION COMMENTARY
Permit Rating :

Posting Load : Type 3: Type 3S2: Type 3-3:Legal

DESCRIPTION ON STRUCTURE
Legal Legal
PPPPP
Speed: 25 mph
The bridge inspection condition assessment used for this inspection is based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Bridge Element Inspection Manual 2013 as defined in Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) federal law. The new element inspection methodology may result in changes to related condition and appraisal ratings on the bridge without significant physical changes at the bridge.

The element condition information contained in this report represents the current condition of the bridge based on the most recent routine and special inspections. Some of the notes presented below may be from an inspection that occurred prior to the date noted in this report. Refer to the Scope and Access section of this inspection report for a description of which portions of the bridge were inspected on this date.

NOTICE

DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
Overlay Thickness: 0.0 inches
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 123 8/4/2026
Printed on: Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM

55C0047/AAAK/65718
6 DECK AND ROADWAY
AC Roadway is in good condition at the northerly abutment.

The bridge deck has several small deck spalls scattering throughout the entire deck.

The bridge deck has numerous diagonal deck cracks at each span up to 0.06 inches wide and

16.0 inches in spacing. In addtion, there is an area of bridge deck that has been covered with Asphalt, northerly abutment.

Type A joint seal (1.0 to 1.5 inches gap at 70.0 degrees of Fahrenheit) has been cracking, disbonding completely at both abutment joint locations and hinges, mainly at northerly abutment.

Between bridge and street sidewalks have two triangular spalls (36.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D and 8.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right at the southwest corner of southerly abutment joint location.

Both concrete bridge railings were painted.

PCC approach and departure slabs are fairly new at the southerly abutment location.

The northerly abutment joint seal is covered with AC roadway at the approach.

SUPERSTRUCTURE
There is no notable distress observed at the time of inspection.

SUBSTRUCTURE
There is a debris at pier wall 3 easterly end that has been accumulating in the front at

10.0 feet wide and 5.0 feet deep. In addition, the tree is laying down at easterly end of pier wall 3; and this tree can be a cause of a large hole at this location at (30.0 feet wide x 40.0 feet long x 4.0 feet deep) southeast corner of spans 2 and 3. The work recommendation has been made back in 02/20/2015 but it has not done yet.

SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
The load rating for this structure is calculated on 08/28/2015 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 08/28/2015.

INSPECTION COMMENTARY
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4
Qty in each Condition State
16 Top Flange-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 703
7 200
sq.m
each
each
496
0 0
207
7 200
0 0
0 0
0 0

ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND COMMENTARY
Defect
/Prot
1080
1130
Defect
(16)
Deck cracks with numerous minor deck spalls.
(16-1080)
The bridge deck has several small deck spalls scattering throughout the entire deck. (16-1130)
The bridge deck has numerous diagonal deck cracks at each span up to 0.05 inches wide, 16.0 inches EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 124 8/4/2026
Printed on: Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM

55C0047/AAAK/65718
6 Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4
Qty in each Condition State
110
182
210
215
234
301
321
331
Girder/Beam-RC
EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
Pier Wall-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
Abutment-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Pier Cap-RC
Joint-Pourable Seal
Seal Damage (Joints)
Approach Slab-RC
Railing-RC
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 489
15 66
3 68
1 1
110
110
148
90 m
ea.
m
each
m
each
m
m
each
sq.m
m
489
15 63
0 67
0 1
0 0
148
90 0
0 3
3 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 40
40 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
70 70
0 0

ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND COMMENTARY
Defect
/Prot
1130
1080
2330
Defect
in spacing.

The bridge deck has random diagonal soffit cracks with white efflorescence inside most bays mainly bays # 2 and #3 throughout all spans.
(110)
There were no significant defects noted.
(182)
There were no significant defects noted.
(210-1130)
Pier wall #2 exhibits three vertical cracks 1.0 mm wide at G #3, #4 and #9.

Pier wall #3 exhibits four vertical cracks 0.5 mm wide.

Pier wall #4 exhibits three vertical cracks 0.5 mm wide. (215-1080)
North abutment cap exhibits a spall 2.5 X 1 ft X 1 ft, part of this spall should support the westerly girder, therefore bearing area of 6" of an equilateral triangle was lost. (234)
The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. There were no significant defects noted. (301)
Disbonding and cracking.
(301-2330)
All joints seals of the pourable joints are failed completely. (321)
There were no significant defects noted. Approach and departure slabs are with Asphalt ovelay on top.
(331)
There were no significant defects noted.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 125 8/4/2026
Printed on: Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM

55C0047/AAAK/65718
6 WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By:

Work By:

Work By:

Work By:

Work By:

Action :

Action :

Action :

Action :

Action :

EstCost:

EstCost:

EstCost:

EstCost:

EstCost:

RecDate:

RecDate:

RecDate:

RecDate:

RecDate:

LOCAL AGENCY

LOCAL AGENCY

LOCAL AGENCY

LOCAL AGENCY

LOCAL AGENCY
Deck-Misc.

Mech/Elect-Misc.

Deck-Methacrylate
Scour-Place Counterm
Joints-Repair/Clean
02/01/2021
02/01/2021
02/12/2019
02/20/2015
10/04/1995
StrTarget:

StrTarget:

StrTarget:

StrTarget:

StrTarget:
2 YEARS
2 YEARS
2 YEARS
2 YEARS
2 YEARS
Sawcut, remove all loose material; and
then, patch sidewalk spall with cement
mortar concrete as the following location
below:

Between bridge and street sidewalks have
two triangular spalls (36.0 inches L x

6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D and 8.0 inches
L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right at
the southwest corner of southerly
abutment joint location.

Secure all the electrical conduits right
in front of both abutment walls.

Prior to seal deck cracks with
Methacrylate. Contractors need to clean
and patch all deck spalls.

Remove debris at pier wall 3 easterly end
that was accumulated in the front 10.0
feet wide and 5.0 feet deep.

Remove the tree that is laying down at
easterly end of pier wall #3; and this
tree can be a cause of a large hole at
this location 30.0 feet wide x 40.0 feet
long x 4.0 feet deep.

Replace the deteriorated Type A joints
seal as follows:

South Abutment: Width of joint is 1.75
inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.

Pier wall 2: Width of joint is 0.5 inches
at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.

Pier wall 3: Width of joint is 1.5 inches
at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.

Pier wall 4: Width of joint is 0.5 inches
at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.

North Abutment: Width of joint is 1.75
inch at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.

DistTarget:

DistTarget:

DistTarget:

DistTarget:

DistTarget:

EA:

EA:

EA:

EA:

EA:

Status :

Status :

Status :

Status :

Status :

PROPOSED

PROPOSED

PROPOSED

PROPOSED

PROPOSED
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 126 8/4/2026
Printed on: Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM

55C0047/AAAK/65718
6 Team Leader : Nelson N. Vo
No. 27141
03/31/2021
Edwin
Mah
CIVIL
Report Author : Nelson N. Vo
Inspected By : NN.Vo/E.Mah
3/19/2021
Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer) (Date)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 127 8/4/2026
Printed on: Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM

55C0047/AAAK/65718
059
12 069

0.3 MI N SANTA CLARA AVE
69000
55C0047

FLOWER ST

SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL
0 33 DEG 46 MIN 13.83 SEC
117 DEG 52 MIN 33.61 SEC
(99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER
(98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE
(3) COUNTY CODE
(2) HIGHWAY AGENCY DISTRICT
(1) STATE NAME- CALIFORNIA
(9) LOCATION-
(4) PLACE CODE
(8) STRUCTURE NUMBER
(7) FACILITY CARRIED-
(6) FEATURE INTERSECTED-
(11) MILEPOINT/KILOMETERPOINT
(16) LATITUDE
(17) LONGITUDE
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE(ON/UNDER)-
**************** IDENTIFICATION ***************
(21) MAINTAIN- 04
(37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE- 5
(112) NBIS BRIDGE LENGTH- Y
(22) OWNER- 04
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE- N
(103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE-
(100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY- 0
(26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS- 19
(104) HIGHWAY SYSTEM- 0
(20) TOLL- 3
(102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC- 2
(110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK - 0
************* CLASSIFICATION ************* CODE
(61) CHANNEL & CHANNEL PROTECTION 8
(62) CULVERTS N
(58) DECK 5
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE 7
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE 7
**************** CONDITION **************** CODE
(31) DESIGN LOAD- 4
(66) INVENTORY RATING- RF= 1.10
(65) INVENTORY RATING METHOD- 8
(64) OPERATING RATING- RF= 1.48
(63) OPERATING RATING METHOD- 8
(70) BRIDGE POSTING- 5
(41) STRUCTURE OPEN, POSTED OR CLOSED- A
********* LOAD RATING AND POSTING ********* CODE
(46) NUMBER OF APPROACH SPANS 0
(45) NUMBER OF SPANS IN MAIN UNIT 4
TYPE- 04
B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE- 0
C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION- 0
(107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE- 1
A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE- 1
1 (43) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN:MATERIAL-
(108) WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM:
******** STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL *********
*************** AGE AND SERVICE ***************
(42) TYPE OF SERVICE: ON- 5
UNDER- 5
(27) YEAR BUILT 1930
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED 0000
(29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 5500
(30) YEAR OF ADT 2021
(19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM
(28) LANES:ON STRUCTURE 02
(109) TRUCK ADT 1 %
(105) FED.LANDS HWY- 0
(13) LRS INVENTORY ROUTE & SUBROUTE
(12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK- 0
**************** APPRAISAL **************** CODE
0 (72) APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT 8
1 (68) DECK GEOMETRY 5
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES 1
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES 8
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION 7
1 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES, VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL N
(71) WATER ADEQUACY 8
(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M
(55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF- 0.0 M
(48) LENGTH OF MAXIMUM SPAN 11.0 M
(35) STRUCTURE FLARED NO
(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY 99.99 M
(54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF- 0.00 M
(32) APPROACH ROADWAY WIDTH (W/SHOULDERS) 19.8 M
(116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERT CLEAR M
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL- N
(40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M
(39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M
(111) PIER PROTECTION-
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN- 0
(52) DECK WIDTH OUT TO OUT 15.8 M
(50) CURB OR SIDEWALK: LEFT 1.5 M RIGHT 1.5 M
(34) SKEW 45 DEG
*************** GEOMETRIC DATA ****************
*************** NAVIGATION DATA ***************
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH 44.5 M
(51) BRIDGE ROADWAY WIDTH CURB TO CURB 12.0 M
********** PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS **********
***********************************************
(94) BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT COST
(95) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT COST
(96) TOTAL PROJECT COST
(114) FUTURE ADT 10688
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2041
SUFFICIENCY RATING = 92.4
*************** INSPECTIONS ***************
(92) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION: (93) CFI DATE
(76) LENGTH OF STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT
(97) YEAR OF IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE
(75) TYPE OF WORK-
(47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 12.0 M
(10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M

A) FRACTURE CRIT DETAIL- NO MO A)

C) OTHER SPECIAL INSP- NO MO C)

B) UNDERWATER INSP- NO MO B)
150000000

NOT ON NET

ON FREE ROAD

CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY

CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY

NOT ELIGIBLE
YES

LOCAL URBAN

NOT STRAHNET

NOT ON NHS

NONE EXISTS
2 WAY

NOT APPLICABLE

NOT ON NET
M-18 OR H-20
(LRFR) LD & RES FA
(LRFR) LD & RES FA

EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL LOADS

DESCRIPTION- OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

NOT APPLICABLE

NO MEDIAN

HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

WATERWAY

CONCRETE
NONE
NONE

CIP CONCRETE
(90) INSPECTION DATE (91) FREQUENCY
TYPE-
(44) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR:MATERIALTEE BEAM

CONCRETE

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL REPORT
% SHARE %

OTHER/NA
OTHER/NA 000
MO
ON
CODE
CODE
CODE
CODE
CODE
CODE
UNDER STRUCTURE 00

NOT H/RR
CODE
CODE
CODE
02/21 24
PAINT CONDITION INDEX = N/A
M

NOT H/RR
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 128 8/4/2026
California Department of Transportation
Division of Maintenance
Structure Maintenance and Investigations
BRIDGE

INSPECTION

RECORDS

INFORMATION
SYSTEM
The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS.

These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual.

Records for “Confidential” bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 129 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 1 of 55C0365/AAAN/102828 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 5 Routine-Roadway View (02/20/2019) Routine-Elevation View (02/20/2019) Routine-Underside View (02/20/2019)

PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
LOCATION 100' E/O FLOWER ST
TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo

FACILITY CARRIED MACARTHUR BLVD
No.

REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo

FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTA ANA DELHI CHANNEL

BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
LATITUDE 33°41'59.57"
Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer)
INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah
CULVERT 6 DETERIORATION

DECK N N/A (NBI)

SUBSTRUCTURE N N/A (NBI)
SUPERSTRUCTURE N N/A (NBI) SUFFICIENCY RATING 68.9

STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
311

PAINT CONDITION N/A

STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
STRUCTURE EVALUATION 6 EQUAL MIN CRITERIA
LONGITUDE 117°52'36.38"
SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING
INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) ON 150000000
POSTMILE 0

ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM ROUTE ON NHS
(9)
(11)
(16)
(17)
(7)
(6)
(5)
(104)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(62)
(67) (113)
Routine Inspection

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Edwin
Mah
03/31/2025
CIVIL
27141
9/11/2023
Date
Exp.

BRIDGE NO.:
55C0365
STRUCTURE NAME:

SANTA ANA DELHI CHANNEL February 6, 2023
INSPECTION DATE:

DECK AREA (M) 2
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 130 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 2 of 55C0365/AAAN/102828 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 5 Triple (11.00 feet W x 11.00 feet H x 95.00 feet L) RC box culvert (grade top). The top of the culvert is the wearing surface. (W) 3 @ 11.00 feet (E).

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION

SPAN CONFIGURATION
(55)ORANGE
12 (69000) SANTA ANA

BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER

BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE

COUNTY CODE

HIGHWAY DISTRICT

STATE NAME

PLACE CODE
% SHARE

AGENCY INFORMATION

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
N/A

YEAR BUILT

YEAR MODIFIED

LENGTH (M)
JOINTS
1971
SKEW
NO. OF HINGES
11 0
0 0

MAIN SPANS
APPR SPANS 0
3 LOAD CAPACITY

DESIGN LOAD

INVENTORY RATING

OPERATING RATING

CALC METHOD

CALC METHOD
0 UNKNOWN
RF=0.75 =>24.3 metric tons
RF=1.25 =>40.5 metric tons
0 FIELD EVAL/ENG JUDG.
0 FIELD EVAL/ENG JUDG.

PERMIT RATING

POSTING LOADS
Legal
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Legal
Legal
PPPPP
MAX SPAN (M) 3.4
Unimpaired 99.99 M

MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE STR FLARE 0-NO

NBIS BR LENGTH Y
STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 1: CONCRETE
DESIGN TYPE MAIN 19: CULVERT
STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE

BRIDGE POSTING

STRUCTURE STATUS
(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M
(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF 0.0 M (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF 0.00 M
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS

A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

N-NOT H/RR

N-NOT H/RR

INSPECTION INFORMATION
CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE

NSTM INSP N-NO MO A)

OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MO C)

UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B)
INSPECTION DATE 02/23 (91) FREQUENCY 24 MO
MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
Safe
Loads
N/A
N/A
N/A
Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
Posting
Signs
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
Speed 40 N/A N/A MPH
Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements
Additional Signs
Load Rating Summary Date
Load Rating Type
11/29/18
CALIFORNIA 069

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Posting Date N/A
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(21)
(22)
(98)
(99)
(90)
(92)
A)
B)
C)
(27)
(106)
(34)
(49)
(112)
(45)
(46)
(48)
(35)
(43a)
(43b)
(44a)
(44b)
(31)
(66)
(64)
(41)
(65)
(63)
(70)

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches
Load Rating Tool - Date SMI Inspection Procedure Manual Section

5.10 - 10/26/18
Assigned Culvert
N/A

STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
NONE
NONE
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 131 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 3 of 55C0365/AAAN/102828 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 5 UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS

SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the culvert to inspect all visible elements of the culvert structure.

Culvert deck was inspected by walking on sidewalk. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the culvert.

There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure. Rain boots maybe needed if it is in raining season.

There is about 4.0 inches deep of water inside barrel 2 only (center span).

REVISIONS
The rail code is changed from 0000 to NNNN.

DECK AND ROADWAY
There are random transverse hairline cracks up to 0.06 inches wide and 12.0 to 18.0 inches in spacing. The work-recommendation has been made to seal all the deck cracks on 03/02/2007 but it is not done.

The northerly sidewalk has longitudinal and map cracks up to 0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long.

The bottom face of the top slab has few longitudinal and transverse cracks, at the west barrel with white efflorescence at the middle and the northerly end.

One section of metal picket fence was damaged by vehicular impacts at the southwest quadrant of the westerly abutment on eastbound approach.

AC Roadway has cracks and settlement up to 2.0 inches.

CULVERT
Culvert wall 4 (east) has an incipient spall at (16.0 inches L s 14.0 inches W) at the top of the northerly end. (see the attached photo 3).

The work-recommendation has been made to patch this spall on 02/24/2017 but it is not done.

Sediment has been accumulating at the southerly end, up to 12.0 inches thick. In addition , there are two piles of debris inside barrels 1 and 3 up to 12.0 thick of mud.

The following is the locations of culvert walls with cracks:

Culvert wall 1 (west wall) has a horizontal crack, 0.03 inches wide 1.0 to 3.0 feet long at northerly half of the wall.

Culvert wall 2 has five vertical cracks up to 0.04 inches wide and 2.0 to 5.0 feet long.

Culvert wall 3 has seven vertical cracks up to 0.06 inches wide 3.0 to 6.0 feet long.

Culvert wall 4 (east) has a horizontal crack 0.05 inches wide and 30.0 feet long at the northerly end approximately 5.0 feet above the invert.

SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
The load rating for this structure is calculated on 11/29/2018 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 11/29/2018.

INSPECTION COMMENTARY
- NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

CONDITION INFORMATION

SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 132 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 4 of 55C0365/AAAN/102828 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 5 TYPE OF MEMBRANE

TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION

DECK STRUCTURE TYPE

TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE

WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 34000
YEAR OF ADT 2021
BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM
(109) TRUCK ADT % 1 %
FUTURE ADT 64343
YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2041
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
0-NONE
0-NONE
0-NONE
1-CIP CONCRETE

DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION

28.2 M

23.8 M

DECK AND ROADWAY

DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE

CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
Natural earth trapezoidal with rock slopes.

LANES 7
40 1-ROUTE ON NHS

PARALLEL STRUCTURE

TEMPORARY STRUCTURE

DEFENSE HIGHWAY

FUNCTIONAL CLASS
SPEED

NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
TOLL

DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC

DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK

TYPE OF SERVICE

TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER

FEDERAL LANDS HWY
APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT
DECK GEOMETRY 2 INTOLERABLE - REPLACE

UNDERCLEARANCES V - H N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI)
WATER ADEQUACY 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE
APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 23.8 M

VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR M

NAVIGATION CONTROL
NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M
NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M

PIER PROTECTION

BRIDGE MEDIAN
CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 1.3 M RIGHT 1.3 M

TOTAL WIDTH

NET WIDTH
INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 13.4 M
INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M
3-ON FREE ROAD
14-OTHER PRIN ART URBAN
0-NOT STRAHNET

N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
0-NOT APPLICABLE
0-NOT ON NET
N: NOT APPLICABLE
3 CLOSED MED W/BARRIERS
5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
5-WATERWAY

DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
(N) 0.70 feet headwall w/metal picket fence on top, 4.30 feet sw, 44.00 feet, 4.50 feet cu med, 34.00 feet, 4.30 feet sw, 0.70 feet headwall w/metal picket fence (S).

DECK CROSS SECTION
LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE 000000000000
BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 1-PART OF NET
SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING

SCOUR POA DATE N/A
CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 PROTECTED
OVERLAY THICKNESS (inches) 0 inches
N/A
N/A
(51)
(52)
(50)
(32)
(33)
(107)
(108)
A)
B)
C)
(29)
(30)
(19)
(114)
(115)
(37)
(42a)
(12)
(13)
(104)
(26)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(10)
(47)
(68)
(72)
(105)
(110)
(20)
(28a)
(103)
(42b)
(69)
(71)
(61)
(113)
(38)
(111)
(39)
(116)
(40)
(49) LENGTH 11.0 M

SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES - NONE 241 Culvert-RC 2 87 m 51 30 6

SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 SUPERSTRUCTURE

SUBSTRUCTURE
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING = N
(62) CULVERT RATING = 6

DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES - NONE
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
(58) DECK RATING =N
(36a) Rail Code N N N N

JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES - NONE

RAIL INFORMATION
(36b) Transition (36c) Appr Guardrail (36d) Appr Guardrail End Roadway Speed 40 MPH

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 133 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 5 of 5 55C0365/AAAN/102828 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Action
Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost
Sub-Patch spalls
02/24/2017
Str Target ROUTINE
Remove, clean and patch culvert wall 4 (east) that exhibits incipient spall (16 inches L x 14 inches W) at the top of the northerly end. (see the attached photo 3)
Dist Target
Status PROPOSED EA
Work By
Work By
Action
Action
Est Cost
Est Cost
Rec Date
Rec Date

LOCAL AGENCY

LOCAL AGENCY
Railing-Misc.

Appr. Roadway-Repair
02/02/2021
02/02/2021
Str Target
Str Target

ROUTINE

ROUTINE
Repair the section of metal picket fence was damaged by vehicular impacts at the southwest quadrant of the westerly abutment on eastbound approach.

Repave the AC Roadway at the approach and departure lanes due to cracks, potholes and settlement.

Dist Target
Dist Target
EA
EA
Status
Status

PROPOSED

PROPOSED

DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Action
Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost
Deck-Methacrylate
03/02/2007
Str Target ROUTINE
Clean and seal the moderate and severe cracks at the the culvert concrete top slab by coating the bridge deck with methacrylate.

Dist Target
Status PROPOSED EA
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Efflorescence/Rust Staining
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 3
3 30
each
each
each
0 0
0 2
3 25
1 0
5 SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 0
0 1080
1120
1130

SUBSTRUCTURE
(62) CULVERT RATING = 6

WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
(241) Culvert-RC
(241-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(241-1120) Efflorescence/Rust Staining
(241-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
Cracks and spalls.

Culvert wall 4 (east) has an incipient spall at (16.0 inches L X 14.0 inches W) at the top of the northerly end. (see the attached photo 3).

The bottom face of the top slab has few longitudinal and transverse cracks, at the west barrel with white efflorescence at the middle and the northerly end.

The following is the locations of culvert walls with cracks:

Culvert wall 1 (west wall) has a horizontal crack, 0.03 inches wide at northerly half of the wall.

Culvert wall 2 has five vertical cracks up to 0.04 inches wide.

Culvert wall 3 has seven vertical cracks up to 0.06 inches wide.

Culvert wall 4 (east) has a horizontal crack 0.05 inches wide, 30.0 feet long at the northerly end approximately 5.0 feet above the invert.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 134 8/4/2026
California Department of Transportation
Division of Maintenance
Structure Maintenance and Investigations
BRIDGE

INSPECTION

RECORDS

INFORMATION
SYSTEM
The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS.

These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual.

Records for “Confidential” bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 135 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 1 of 55C0163/AAAM/102828 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 Routine-Roadway View (02/13/2019) Routine-Elevation View (02/13/2019) Routine-Underside View (02/13/2019)

PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
LOCATION 0.4 MI W/O FAIRVIEW ST
TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo

FACILITY CARRIED MCFADDEN AVENUE
No.

REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo

FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTA ANA RIVER

BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
LATITUDE 33°44'14.62"
Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer)
INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah

CULVERT N N/A (NBI)
DECK 7 GOOD
SUBSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD
SUPERSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD SUFFICIENCY RATING 78.2

STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
2,266

PAINT CONDITION N/A

STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
STRUCTURE EVALUATION 7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIA
LONGITUDE 117°54'47.23"
SCOUR 7 COUNTERMEASURES
INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) ON 150000000
POSTMILE 0

ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM NOT ON NHS
(9)
(11)
(16)
(17)
(7)
(6)
(5)
(104)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(62)
(67) (113)
Routine Inspection

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Edwin
Mah
03/31/2025
CIVIL
27141
9/11/2023
Date
Exp.

BRIDGE NO.:
55C0163
STRUCTURE NAME:

SANTA ANA RIVER February 6, 2023
INSPECTION DATE:

DECK AREA (M) 2
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 136 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 2 of 55C0163/AAAM/102828 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 Continuous 7-span CIP/RC T-girder (9 each) with RC pier walls and RC open end seat abutments, all supported on concrete piles.

Original (EB lanes): (W) 40.00 feet, 5 @ 54.00 feet, 40.00 feet (E). 1- Widened north side (WB lanes): (W) 53.00 feet, 5 @ 54.00 feet, 53.00 feet (E). 2- widening 9 inches from the south side.

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION

SPAN CONFIGURATION
(55)ORANGE
12 (69000) SANTA ANA

BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER

BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE

COUNTY CODE

HIGHWAY DISTRICT

STATE NAME

PLACE CODE
% SHARE

AGENCY INFORMATION

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION

YEAR BUILT

YEAR MODIFIED

LENGTH (M)
JOINTS
1964
SKEW
NO. OF HINGES
1977
106.7
36 5 2

MAIN SPANS
APPR SPANS 0
7 LOAD CAPACITY

DESIGN LOAD

INVENTORY RATING

OPERATING RATING

CALC METHOD

CALC METHOD
5 MS 18 (HS 20)
RF=1.12 =>36.3 metric tons
RF=1.85 =>59.9 metric tons
1 LF LOAD FACTOR
1 LF LOAD FACTOR

PERMIT RATING

POSTING LOADS
Legal
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Legal
Legal
PPPPP
MAX SPAN (M) 16.5
Unimpaired 99.99 M

MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE STR FLARE 0-NO

NBIS BR LENGTH Y
STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 2: CONCRETE CONT
DESIGN TYPE MAIN 04: TEE BEAM
STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE

BRIDGE POSTING

STRUCTURE STATUS
(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M
(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF 0.0 M (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF 0.00 M
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS

A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

N-NOT H/RR

N-NOT H/RR

INSPECTION INFORMATION
CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE

NSTM INSP N-NO MO A)

OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MO C)

UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B)
INSPECTION DATE 02/23 (91) FREQUENCY 24 MO
MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
Safe
Loads
N/A
N/A
N/A
Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
Posting
Signs
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
Speed 45 N/A N/A MPH
Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements
Additional Signs
Load Rating Summary Date
Load Rating Type
04/05/2013
CALIFORNIA 069

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Posting Date N/A
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(21)
(22)
(98)
(99)
(90)
(92)
A)
B)
C)
(27)
(106)
(34)
(49)
(112)
(45)
(46)
(48)
(35)
(43a)
(43b)
(44a)
(44b)
(31)
(66)
(64)
(41)
(65)
(63)
(70)

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
OVERLAY THICKNESS 1 inches
Load Rating Tool - Date BDS - 10/07/82
Calculated
N/A

STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
NONE
NONE
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 137 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 3 of 55C0163/AAAM/102828 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure.

Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder and median area. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge with binoculars.

There is no need for special equipment to inspect this structure. Probably, rain boots are needed if there is water inside the channel.

The channel is dry .

DECK AND ROADWAY
Bridge deck has a Polyester Concrete Overlay.

The soffit spalls as the following locations below:

At span 1, there are two spalls at (9.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) with exposed and rusted rebars approximately 8.0 feet and 10.0 feet from the westerly abutment inside bay 8 (southerly bay).

At span 6, there is a spall at (24.0 inches L x 18.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) at the widening portion approximately 20.0 feet from pier wall 7 inside bay 5 (see the attached photo no. 3).

The soffit cracks as the following locations below:

The soffit of the northerly bays has three longitudinal and transverse cracks (up to 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long) with efflorescence.

The soffit of spans 1 to 5 and 7 (only at the southerly 3 bays of the original bridge) has several transverse cracks (up to 0.05 inches wide and 8.0 to 12.0 inches long) with efflorescence.

At span 6 of the original bridge, there are few transverse cracks at 0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long with white efflorescence.

There are longitudinal and transverse cracks at 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet long scattering on both of the bridge sidewalk; and also, numerous small spalls with exposed rebars and rusted inside the face of bridge railings.

Joint-Strip Seal Expansion is inside westerly abutment joint, lanes 1 and 2 on westbound. On westbound, there are two broken pieces of strip seal inside the easterly abutment joint location.

Joint seal is not visible on eastbound at both abutment joint locations (westerly and easterly abutments) because of AC roadway covering at both approach and depart lanes.

Both hinges have type A pourable seal with 2.0 inches gap at 70.0 degrees of Fahrenheit.

There are longitudinal cracks (up to 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet long) on both bridge sidewalks.

SUPERSTRUCTURE
The following is the locations of spalls on girders:

At span 1 (westerly side), girders 5 and 6, each has a spall (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right at the middle of the span.

At span 6, girder 9 has a spall at (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 10.0 feet from the westerly side of pier wall 7.

At span 7 (see the attached photo no. 4)
Girder 1 has a spall at (3.0 inches L x 5.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 6.0 feet from the pier wall.

Girder 8 has a spall at (8.0 inches L x 10.0 inches W x 1.5 inches D) at the middle of the span, northerly face.

Girder 9 (southerly side) has a spall about (3.0 inches L x 5.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 8.0 feet from the pier wall.

There are three concrete small spalls about (3.0 inches L x 3.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) in the most southerly girder of the most easterly span; and also, at the easterly span girder 2 (counting from south) has a spall at (6.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) at mid-span.

Span 7, Southerly girder has several vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long at the easterly end.

SUBSTRUCTURE
Each pier wall has at least two vertical cracks (up to 0.05 inches wide, 10.0 to 15.0 feet long and 6.0 to 8.0 feet in spacing).

There is graffiti on bridge abutment and pier walls.

SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
The load rating for this structure is calculated 04/05/2013 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating

INSPECTION COMMENTARY

CONDITION INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 138 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 4 of 55C0163/AAAM/102828 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS
summary sheet is archived on 04/05/2013.

INSPECTION COMMENTARY

TYPE OF MEMBRANE

TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION

DECK STRUCTURE TYPE

TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE

WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 22000
YEAR OF ADT 2021
BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 3 KM
(109) TRUCK ADT % 1 %
FUTURE ADT 38479
YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2041
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
2-INTEGRAL CONC.
0-NONE
0-NONE
1-CIP CONCRETE

DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION

20.3 M

16.6 M

DECK AND ROADWAY
LANES 4
45 0-NOT ON NHS

PARALLEL STRUCTURE

TEMPORARY STRUCTURE

DEFENSE HIGHWAY

FUNCTIONAL CLASS
SPEED

NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
TOLL

DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC

DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK

TYPE OF SERVICE

FEDERAL LANDS HWY
APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 6 EQUAL MIN CRITERIA
DECK GEOMETRY 5 ABOVE TOLERABLE
APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 17.4 M

BRIDGE MEDIAN
CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 1.5 M RIGHT 1.5 M

TOTAL WIDTH

NET WIDTH
INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 16.6 M
INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M
3-ON FREE ROAD
16-MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN
0-NOT STRAHNET

N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
0-NOT APPLICABLE
0-NOT ON NET
0 NO MEDIAN
5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
(S) 1.0 foot br, 5.0 feet sw, 52.00 feet, 5.00 feet sw, 1.00 foot br (N).

DECK CROSS SECTION

LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
- NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

OVERLAY THICKNESS (inches) 1 inches
N/A
(51)
(52)
(50)
(32)
(33)
(107)
(108)
A)
B)
C)
(29)
(30)
(19)
(114)
(115)
(37)
(42a)
(12)
(13)
(104)
(26)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(10)
(47)
(68)
(72)
(105)
(110)
(20)
(28a)
(103)

CONDITION INFORMATION
(49) LENGTH 106.7 M
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition State
16 Top Flange-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
Deck Wearing Surface-Concrete
2 2
2 2
2166
1 200
1728
sq.m
each
each
sq.m
1965
0 0
1728
200
0 200
0 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Defect/
Prot
1080
1130
511
Defect
(16-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(16-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
The soffit spalls as the following locations below:

At span 1, there are two spalls at (9.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) with exposed rebars and rusted approximately 8.0 feet and 10.0 feet from the westerly abutment inside bay 8 (southerly bay).

At span 6, there is a spall at (24.0 inches L x 18.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) at the widening portion approximately 20.0 feet from pier wall 7 inside bay 5 (see the attached photo no. 3).

The soffit cracks as the following locations below:

The soffit of the northerly bays has three longitudinal and transverse cracks at 0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long with white efflorescence.
(58) DECK RATING =7

SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 139 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 5 of 55C0163/AAAM/102828 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 110 Girder/Beam-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 1000
4 1
m
each
each
995
0 0
3 2
1 2
2 0
0 0
0 SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
1080
1130

SUPERSTRUCTURE
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING = 7
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition State

DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Defect/
Prot Defect
(16-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(16-511) Deck Wearing Surface-Concrete
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
The soffit of spans 1 to 5 and 7 (only at the southerly 3 bays of the original bridge) has several transverse cracks up to 0.05 inches wide with white efflorescence.

At span 6 of the original bridge, there are few transverse cracks up to 0.05 inches wide with white efflorescence.

Bridge deck has a Polyester Concrete Deck Overlay.
(58) DECK RATING =7
(36a) Rail Code 1 0 0 0
300
301
304
331
333
Joint-Strip Seal Exp
Seal Damage (Joints)
Joint-Pourable Seal
Joint-Open Expansion
Railing-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
Railing-Other
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 25
1 25
130
107
5 107
5 5
m
each
m
m
m
each
m
each
each
24 0
25 130
102
0 97
0 0
0 0
0 0
5 5
10 5
5 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES 2330
1130
1080
1130

RAIL INFORMATION
(36b) Transition (36c) Appr Guardrail (36d) Appr Guardrail End Roadway Speed 45 MPH

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(300-2330) Seal Damage (Joints)
(301) Joint-Pourable Seal
(304) Joint-Open Expansion
(331-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(333) Railing-Other
(333-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(333-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
Joint seal runs across all lanes of westbound with three holes at 2.0 inches wide at the easterly abutment (see the attached photo no. 2).

There were no significant defects noted.

Along the original edge of deck and the widening edge of deck with Type A Seal.

There are longitudinal and transverse cracks at 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet long scattering on both of the bridge sidewalk.

There were no significant defects noted.

There are longitudinal and transverse cracks up to 0.05 inches wide scattering on both of bridge sidewalks.

There are numerous small spalls with exposed rebars and rusted inside the face of bridge railings.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 140 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 6 of 55C0163/AAAM/102828 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE

CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
RC trapezoidal.

TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER

UNDERCLEARANCES V - H N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI)
WATER ADEQUACY 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE

VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR M

NAVIGATION CONTROL
NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M
NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M

PIER PROTECTION
5-WATERWAY 0: NO CONTROL
SCOUR 7 COUNTERMEASURES

SCOUR POA DATE N/A
CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 PROTECTED
N/A
(42b)
(69)
(71)
(61)
(113)
(38)
(111)
(39)
(116)
(40)
182
312
EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
Bearing-Enclosed
2 2
8 2
ea.
each
8 2
0 0
0 0
0 0

SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
210 Pier Wall-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
119
5 m
each
114
0 5
5 0
0 SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 1130 0

SUPERSTRUCTURE

SUBSTRUCTURE
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING = 7
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE RATING = 7
(110-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(110-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(182) EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
(312) Bearing-Enclosed
(210-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
The following is the locations of pier walls with cracks:

Pier wall 2 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide at the original portion.

Pier wall 3 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches at the original portion.

Pier wall 4 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide.

The following is the locations of spalls on girders:

At span 1 (westerly side), girders 5 and 6, each has a spall at (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right at the middle of the span.

At span 6, girder 9 has a spall at (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 10.0 feet from the westerly side of pier wall

7. At span 7 (see the attached photo no. 4)
Girder 1 has a spall at (3.0 inches L x 5.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 6.0 feet from the pier wall.

Girder 8 has a spall at (8.0 inches L x 10.0 inches W x 1.5 inches D) at the middle of the span, northerly face.

Girder 9 (southerly side) has a spall about (3.0 inches L x 5.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 8.0 feet from the pier wall.

There are three concrete small spalls about (3.0 inches L x 3.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) in the most southerly girder of the most easterly span; and also, at the easterly span girder 2 (counting from south) has a spall at (6.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) at mid-span.

Span #7, Southerly girder has few vertical cracks up to 0.04 inches wide at the easterly end.

There were no significant defects noted.

There were no significant defects noted.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 141 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM Page 7 of 7 55C0163/AAAM/102828 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Action
Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost
Deck-Patch spalls
02/20/2019
Str Target ROUTINE
Remove and clean all loose material around the following soffit spalls; and then, patch them with cement mortar.

At span 1, there are two spalls at (9.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) with exposed rebars and rusted approximately 8.0 feet and 10.0 feet from the westerly abutment inside Bay 8 (southerly bay).

At span 6, there is a spall at (24.0 inches L x 18.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) at the widening portion approximately 20.0 feet from pier wall 7 inside Bay 5 (see the attached photo no. 3).

The following locations have spalls along the edge of deck (between the original and widening section) below:

There is a spall at (20.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) at mid span 6 inside Bay 5 along the original soffit edge of deck and the widening portion.

Along the longitudinal joint of span 1 inside Bay 5 (westerly span) has two spalls about (16.0 inches L x 16.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) at the southerly side.

Dist Target
Status PROPOSED EA
215
227
Abutment-RC
Pile-RC
2 2
40 1
m
ea.
40 1
0 0
0 0

SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 0

SUBSTRUCTURE
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE RATING = 7

WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
(210-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(215) Abutment-RC
(227) Pile-RC
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
Pier wall 5 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide.

Pier wall 6 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide.

Pier wall 7 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide.

There were no significant defects noted.

The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 142 8/4/2026
California Department of Transportation
Division of Maintenance
Structure Maintenance and Investigations
BRIDGE

INSPECTION

RECORDS

INFORMATION
SYSTEM
The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS.

These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual.

Records for “Confidential” bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 143 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM Page 1 of 55C0689/AAAE/102830 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Routine-Roadway View (02/13/2019) Routine-Elevation View (02/13/2019) Routine-Underside View (02/13/2019)

PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
LOCATION 0.5 MI E/O HARBOR BLVD
TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo

FACILITY CARRIED FIRST STREET
No.

REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo

FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL

BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
LATITUDE 33°44'42.38"
Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer)
INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah

CULVERT N N/A (NBI)
DECK 7 GOOD
SUBSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD
SUPERSTRUCTURE 7 GOOD SUFFICIENCY RATING 75.4

STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
2,734

PAINT CONDITION N/A

STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
STRUCTURE EVALUATION 7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIA
LONGITUDE 117°54'40.94"
SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING
INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) ON 15000000
POSTMILE 0

ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM ROUTE ON NHS
(9)
(11)
(16)
(17)
(7)
(6)
(5)
(104)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(62)
(67) (113)
Routine Inspection

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Edwin
Mah
03/31/2025
CIVIL
27141
9/11/2023
Date
Exp.

BRIDGE NO.:
55C0689
STRUCTURE NAME:

SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL February 9, 2023
INSPECTION DATE:

DECK AREA (M) 2
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 144 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM Page 2 of 55C0689/AAAE/102830 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Three span PC/PS concrete "I" girder (10) with stay in place form on two RC pier wall and two closed end RC cantilever abutments with monolithic wingwalls supported on RC pile cap on PC/PS concrete piles. (W) 100.00 feet, 120.00 feet, 100.00 feet (E).

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION

SPAN CONFIGURATION
(55)ORANGE
12 (69000) SANTA ANA

BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER

BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE

COUNTY CODE

HIGHWAY DISTRICT

STATE NAME

PLACE CODE
% SHARE

AGENCY INFORMATION

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
N/A

YEAR BUILT

YEAR MODIFIED

LENGTH (M)
JOINTS
2012
SKEW
NO. OF HINGES

97.5 18
2 0

MAIN SPANS
APPR SPANS 0
3 LOAD CAPACITY

DESIGN LOAD

INVENTORY RATING

OPERATING RATING

CALC METHOD

CALC METHOD
5 MS 18 (HS 20)
RF=1.00 =>32.4 metric tons
RF=1.67 =>54.1 metric tons

A ASSIGNED LFD

A ASSIGNED LFD

PERMIT RATING

POSTING LOADS
Legal
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Legal
Legal
PPPPP
MAX SPAN (M) 36.6
Unimpaired 99.99 M

MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE STR FLARE 0-NO

NBIS BR LENGTH Y
STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 5: PRESTRESS CONC
DESIGN TYPE MAIN 02: STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM
STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE

BRIDGE POSTING

STRUCTURE STATUS
(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT 0.0 M
(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY (55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF 0.0 M (54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF 0.00 M
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS

A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

N-NOT H/RR

N-NOT H/RR

INSPECTION INFORMATION
CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE

NSTM INSP N-NO MO A)

OTHER SPECIAL INSP N-NO MO C)

UNDERWATER INSP N-NO MO B)
INSPECTION DATE 02/23 (91) FREQUENCY 24 MO
MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
Safe
Loads
N/A
N/A
N/A
Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
Posting
Signs
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
Speed 40 N/A N/A MPH
Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements
Additional Signs
Load Rating Summary Date
Load Rating Type
04/28/15
CALIFORNIA 069

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Posting Date N/A
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(21)
(22)
(98)
(99)
(90)
(92)
A)
B)
C)
(27)
(106)
(34)
(49)
(112)
(45)
(46)
(48)
(35)
(43a)
(43b)
(44a)
(44b)
(31)
(66)
(64)
(41)
(65)
(63)
(70)

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches
Load Rating Tool - Date As Built, Contract Plans - 04/28/15 Assigned by Design LFD
N/A

STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
NONE
NONE
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 145 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM Page 3 of 55C0689/AAAE/102830 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS

SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure.

Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder and median area. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge with rain boots if it is in raing season.

There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure.

The channel is dry.

REVISIONS
The entire quantity of RC abutments ELI 215 is modified from 25 m to 35 m because the wingwalls are monolithic with the abutments.

DECK AND ROADWAY
There are longitudinal and transverse deck cracks (up to 0.06 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet in spacing) throughout the entire deck.

The metal corregated deck form covers the deck soffit. The work recommendation has been made to treat bridge deck cracks, but it is not done.

There are transverse cracks with white efflorescence under both deck overhangs, on bridge deck soffit and inside closure pour.

There are longitudinal cracks up to 0.05 inches wide throughout both approach and departure slabs.

There are numerous small spalls at (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) mainly inside the northerly rail at middle of the bridge. In addition, there are longitudinal cracks up to 0.05 on both sidewalks.

There is debris inside strip seal gap.

The northerly bridge railing was painted.

SUPERSTRUCTURE
At span 1, the girder 10 has two spalls (3.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right above the bike path approximately 40.0 feet from the westerly abutment.

The following is the locations of spalls due to the previous fire years ago under span 1.

Girder 8, there is a spall at (15.0 feet L x 2.0 feet W x 1.0 inch D) at the southerly face; and also, the bottom flange surface has a spall at

6.0 feet L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D (see the attached photos no. 1 and 2).

Girder 9, there is a spall (9.0 feet L x 2.0 feet W x 1.0 inch D) at the northerly face (see the attached photo no. 3). The work recommendation has been made in 2017 but it is not done.

SUBSTRUCTURE
Pier wall 2 has a vertical crack up to 0.04 inches wide.

Pier wall 3 has a vertical crack up to 0.04 inches wide.

SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
The load rating for this structure is calculated on 04/28/2015 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 04/28/2015.

INSPECTION COMMENTARY
- NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.

CONDITION INFORMATION

SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 146 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM Page 4 of 55C0689/AAAE/102830 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 TYPE OF MEMBRANE

TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION

DECK STRUCTURE TYPE

TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE

WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC 30000
YEAR OF ADT 2021
BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH 2 KM
(109) TRUCK ADT % 1 %
FUTURE ADT 53226
YEAR OF FUTURE ADT 2040
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
0-NONE
0-NONE
0-NONE
1-CIP CONCRETE

DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION

28.0 M

21.4 M

DECK AND ROADWAY
LANES 6
40 1-ROUTE ON NHS

PARALLEL STRUCTURE

TEMPORARY STRUCTURE

DEFENSE HIGHWAY

FUNCTIONAL CLASS
SPEED

NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
TOLL

DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC

DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK

TYPE OF SERVICE

FEDERAL LANDS HWY
APPR ROADWAY ALIGN 8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRIT
DECK GEOMETRY 2 INTOLERABLE - REPLACE
APPROACH RDWY WIDTH 21.4 M

BRIDGE MEDIAN
CURB OR SIDEWALK LEFT 2.4 M RIGHT 2.4 M

TOTAL WIDTH

NET WIDTH
INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR 10.7 M
INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR 99.99 M
3-ON FREE ROAD
14-OTHER PRIN ART URBAN
0-NOT STRAHNET

N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
0-NOT APPLICABLE
0-NOT ON NET
3 CLOSED MED W/BARRIERS
5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

DECK GEOMETRY DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
(N) 1.00 foot br, 8.00 feet sw, 36.00 feet, 4.00 feet conc curb med., 3d6.00 feet , 8.00 feet sw, 1.00 foot br (S).

DECK CROSS SECTION
LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE 000000000000
BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 1-PART OF NET
OVERLAY THICKNESS (inches) 0 inches
N/A
(51)
(52)
(50)
(32)
(33)
(107)
(108)
A)
B)
C)
(29)
(30)
(19)
(114)
(115)
(37)
(42a)
(12)
(13)
(104)
(26)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(10)
(47)
(68)
(72)
(105)
(110)
(20)
(28a)
(103)
(49) LENGTH 97.5 M
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition State
12 Deck-RC
Efflorescence/Rust Staining
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 2087
30 300
sq.m
each
each
1757
0 0
280
30 250
50 0
50 0
0 0

DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Defect/
Prot
1120
1130
Defect
(12-1120) Efflorescence/Rust Staining
(12-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
There are random transverse cracks with white efflorescence under both deck overhang and bridge deck soffit.

There are longitudinal and transverse deck cracks (up to 0.06 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet in spacing) throughout the entire deck. (58) DECK RATING =7
(36a) Rail Code 1 0 0 0
300
321
Joint-Strip Seal Exp
Approach Slab-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 60
411
100
m
sq.m
each
60 311
0 0
80 80
0 20
20 0
0 0

JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES 1130

RAIL INFORMATION
(36b) Transition (36c) Appr Guardrail (36d) Appr Guardrail End Roadway Speed 40 MPH

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(300) Joint-Strip Seal Exp
(321-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
There were no significant defects noted.

There are map cracks up to 0.06 inches wide throughout both approach and departure slabs.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 147 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM Page 5 of 55C0689/AAAE/102830 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE

CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
Trapezoidal concrete lined.

TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER

UNDERCLEARANCES V - H N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI)
WATER ADEQUACY 9 ABOVE DESIRABLE

VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR M

NAVIGATION CONTROL
NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M
NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE 0.0 M

PIER PROTECTION
5-WATERWAY N: NOT APPLICABLE
SCOUR 8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTING

SCOUR POA DATE N/A
CHANNEL PROTECTION 9 NO DEFICIENCIES
N/A
(42b)
(69)
(71)
(61)
(113)
(38)
(111)
(39)
(116)
(40)
109
310
Girder/Beam-PS Conc.

Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Bearing-Elastomeric
2 2
2 976
10 60
m
each
each
966
0 60
0 0
0 10
10 0
0 0
0 SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
1080
210
215
Pier Wall-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
Abutment-RC
2 2
2 60
2 82
m
each
m
58 0
82 2
2 0
0 0
0 SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 0
0 1130

SUPERSTRUCTURE

SUBSTRUCTURE
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING = 7
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE RATING = 7
(109-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(310) Bearing-Elastomeric
(210-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(215) Abutment-RC
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
Pier wall 2 has a vertical crack up to 0.04 inches wide and 5.0 feet long.

Pier wall 3 has a vertical crack up to 0.04 inches wide and 5.0 feet long.

At span 1, the girder 10 has two spalls (3.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right above the bike path approximately 40.0 feet from the westerly abutment.

The following is the locations of spalls due to the previous fire years ago under span 1.

Girder 8, there is a spall at (15.0 feet L x 2.0 feet W x 1.0 inch D) at the southerly face; and also, the bottom flange surface has a spall at 6.0 feet L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D (see the attached photos no. 1 and 2).

Girder 9, there is a spall (9.0 feet L x 2.0 feet W x 1.0 inch D) at the northerly face (see the attached photo no. 3).

There were no significant defects noted.
331 Railing-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
2 2
207
4 m
each
203
0 4
4 0
0 0
0 JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES 1080

JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(331-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
There are numerous small spalls at (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) mainly inside the northerly rail at the middle of the bridge. In addition, there are random longitudinal sidewalk cracks up to 0.05 on both sides.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 148 8/4/2026
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM Page 6 of 6 55C0689/AAAE/102830 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations

OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE

SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS

SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
Work By
Action
Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost
Super-Patch spalls
03/07/2017
Str Target ROUTINE
Patch all spalls on girders 8 and 9 of span 1.

Dist Target
Status PROPOSED EA

DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Action
Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY Est Cost
Deck-Methacrylate
02/20/2019
Str Target ROUTINE
Treat deck, approach and departure slab cracks with Methacrylate.

Dist Target
Status PROPOSED EA
227 Pile-RC 2 1 ea. 1 0 0

SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 SUBSTRUCTURE
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE RATING = 7

WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
(215) Abutment-RC
(227) Pile-RC
Elem Element Description
No.

Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Defect/ Qty in each Condition State
Prot Defect
Monolithic wingwalls are included in the total quantity.

The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 149 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

PLEASE SEE BELOW

EXHIBIT VI

LOCATION MAP AND BPMP PLAN
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 150 8/4/2026
PM00187
Priority
(Lowest
Number is
Top
Agency
Location

REQUEST
PE-Phase
Bridge
Number
from
Inspection
Facility Carried Feature Intersected Location
Sufficiency
Rating
SD/FO
Status Work Description
Deck Area
(ft2)
Unit Cost
($/ft2)
Federal Share Local Share
Total Particip.

Cost
1 City of Santa
Ana
PE-Phase 55C0055 MAIN STREET SANTIAGO CREEK

CHANNEL

0.2 MI N/O ROUTE 5
FWY

90.8 SD Core Bridge Deck and Test for Cloride Content 15510 $ 2.84 $ 35,216.00 $ 8,804.00 $ 44,020.00 2 City of Santa
Ana
PE-Phase 55C0423 17TH STREET SANTA ANA RIVER

CHANNEL

0.2 MI E/O FAIRVIEW ST 81.3 - Chain Deck; Core Deck and Test for Cloride Content; Clean and replace joint seals; Apply Methacrylate to Deck 32936 $ 13.41 $ 353,312.00 $ 88,328.00 $ 441,640.00 3 City of Santa
Ana
PE-Phase 55C0115 BRISTOL STREET SANTIAGO CREEK

CHANNEL

0.3 MI S/O MEMORY
LANE

84.8 - Clean and Replace Expasion joints; Apply Methacrylate to Deck 10200 $ 18.66 $ 152,232.00 $ 38,058.00 $ 190,290.00 4 City of Santa
Ana
PE-Phase 55C0372 5TH STREET 5TH STREET 0.6 MI E/O HARBOR BLVD

79.5 - Clean and Replace Transvers Joint seals 20480 $ 1.88 $ 30,816.00 $ 7,704.00 $ 38,520.00 5 City of Santa
Ana
PE-Phase 55C0047 FLOWER STREET SANTIAGO CREEK

CHANNEL

0.3 MI N SANTA CLARA
AVE

90.5 SD Apply Methacrylate, Clean and replace expansion joints 7685 $ 18.38 $ 113,008.00 $ 28,252.00 $ 141,260.00 6 City of Santa
Ana
PE-Phase 55C0365 MACARTHUR BL SANTA ANA DELHI

CHANNEL
100' E/O FLOWER ST 66.4 FO Clean and replace Longitudinal Joint; Apply Methacrylate 3420 $ 14.53 $ 39,760.00 $ 9,940.00 $ 49,700.00 7 City of Santa
Ana
PE-Phase 55C0163 MCFADDEN
AVENUE
SANTA ANA RIVER 0.4 MI W/O FAIRVIEW
ST

78.9 - Clean and Replace Longitudinal Joint and transverse Expasion joints; 25071 $ 2.88 $ 57,800.00 $ 14,450.00 $ 72,250.00 8 City of Santa
Ana
PE-Phase 55c0689 FIRST STREET SANTA ANA

GARDENS CHANEL

0.5 MI E/O HARBOR
BLVD

75.4 - Apply Methacrylate 29370 $ 8.43 $ 197,976.00 $ 49,494.00 $ 247,470.00 $ 980,120.00 $ 245,030.00 $ 1,225,150.00
Summary:

Total
Participating
Cost
Federal Match
(80%)
Local Match
(20%)
CON= $ 1,225,150.00 $ 980,120.00 $ 245,030.00
PE Phase Request ===>> 25% PE= $ 306,287.50 $ 245,030.00 $ 61,257.50 15% CE= $ 183,772.50 $ 147,018.00 $ 36,754.50
25% Cont= $ 306,287.50 $ 245,030.00 $ 61,257.50
Total= $ 2,021,497.50 $ 1,617,198.00 $ 404,299.50
City of Santa Ana
BPMP Plan ‐2020
rev. 9/28/22 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 151 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 152 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Certification - I certify that I have read, understand and agree to the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposals. I have examined the Scope of Services (Exhibit I) and am qualified to provide services being requested as specified herein. I understand and agree that I am responsible for reporting any errors, omissions or discrepancies to the City for clarification prior to the submission of my proposal.

PROPOSER’S STATEMENT: I have read, understood and agree to the terms and conditions on all pages of the Request for Proposals. Upon request, I will transfer and deliver goods or services to the City in accordance with said terms and conditions.
__________________________________________________________________________________

LEGAL NAME OF COMPANY PHONE AND FAX NUMBERS
__________________________________________________________________________________

BUSINESS ADDRESS
__________________________________________________________________________________

PRINTED NAME OF AUTHORIZED AGENT TITLE
__________________________________________________________________________________

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED AGENT DATE E-MAIL ADDRESS
__________________________________________________________________________________

FEDERAL ID NUMBER (IF APPLICABLE) CONTRACTOR LICENSE NUMBER (IFAPPLICABLE)
__________________________________________________________________________________

CITY OF SANTA ANA BUSINESS LICENSE NUMBER
(PLEASE PROVIDE IF AVAILABLE, BUT NOT REQUIRED UNTIL AND IF AN AWARD IS MADE TO PROPOSER.) THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT A
PROPOSER’S CERTIFICATION, PROPOSAL PRICING
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 153 /4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Proposer understands and agrees that this written RFP (or any part thereof specifically designated and accepted by the City of Santa Ana, hereinafter City) shall constitute the entire agreement between proposer and the City only after it has been accepted by the City Council, endorsed by the Clerk of the Council with her signature and official seal noting hereon the action of approval of the Council, signed by the Executive Director or his duly authorized agent, and signed by the City Attorney, denoting his approval of the form of this document, and its execution, and when it or an exact copy of it has been either delivered to proposer or deposited with the United States Postal Service properly addressed to the proposer with the correct postage affixed thereto.

Proposer further agrees that upon delivery (as defined above) of the accepted agreement he/she will furnish City all required bonds and certificate of liability insurance within ten (10) days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and City’s legal holidays), or the funds, check, draft, or proposer’s bond substituted in lieu thereof accompanying this proposal shall become the property of the City and shall be considered as payment of damages due to the delay and other causes suffered by City because of the failure to furnish the necessary bonds and because it is distinctly agreed that the proof of damages actually suffered by City is difficult to ascertain; otherwise said funds, check drafts, or proposer’s bond substituted in lieu thereof shall be returned to the undersigned.

Proposer understands that a proposal is required for the entire work, that the estimated quantities set forth in the RFP schedule are solely for the purpose of comparing proposals, and that final compensation under the contract will be based upon the actual quantities of work satisfactorily completed.

All terms contained in the specifications, the certification of nondiscrimination by contractors, and the required insurance certificates are to be incorporated by reference into this agreement and are made specifically as part of this RFP.

Firm________________________________________________________________________________ Signed and Printed Name: ______________________________________________________________ Title ________________________________________________________________________________ Date
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT B
PROPOSER’S STATEMENT
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 154 /4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
(Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106) To the CITY OF SANTA ANA
In accordance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the proposer declares that the proposal is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the proposer has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other proposer to put in a false or sham proposal, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived or agreed with any proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the proposer has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price of the proposer or any proposer, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the proposal price, or of that of any other proposer, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the proposal are true; and, further, that the proposer has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal.

Note: The above non-collusion affidavit is part of the proposal. Signing this proposal on the signature portion thereof shall also constitute signature of this non-collusion affidavit. Proposers are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution.

Signed____________________________________________________________________________ State of ________, County of __________________________________________________________ Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this________ day of_____________, 20____, by ________________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me.
________________________
Notary Public Signature Notary Public Seal
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT C

NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 155 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities," in conformance with its instructions.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

Signed:

Title:

Firm:

Date:

THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT D

NON-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 156 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
The undersigned consultant or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows:

1. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.

2. The Consultant shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

3. The Consultant shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers’ representatives of the Consultant’s commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.

4. The Consultant shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor.

5. The Consultant shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders.

1. In the event of the Consultant’s non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.

2. The Consultant shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract

ATTACHMENT E

NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 157 /4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event the Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subconsultant or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Consultant may request that the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States.

8. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1735, as added by Chapter 643 Stats. 1939, and as amended, no discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicaps, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Section 1420, and any consultant of public works violating this Section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of the Chapter.

Signed:

Title:

Firm:

Date:

THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 158 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Bidder acknowledges and agrees that under Public Contract Code section 4100, et seq., it must clearly set forth below the name and location of each subcontractor who will perform work or labor or render service to the bidder in or about the work in an amount in excess of one-half of one percent (0.5%) of bidder’s total bid and the kind of work that each will perform. Furthermore, bidder acknowledges and agrees that under Public Contract Code section 4100, et seq., if bidder fails to list as to any portion of work, or if bidder lists more than one subcontractor to perform the same portion of work (i.e. bidder must indicate what portion of the work each subcontractor will perform), bidder must perform that portion itself or be subjected to penalty under applicable law.

If alternate bids are called for and bidder intends to use subcontractors different from or in addition to those subcontractors listed for work under the base bid, bidder must list subcontractors that will perform work in an amount in excess of one half of one percent (0.5%) of bidder’s total bid, including alternates.

In case more than one subcontractor is named for the same kind of work, the Contractor is to state the portion of work that each subcontractor will perform. Bidders or suppliers of materials only do not need to be listed. If further space is required for the list of proposed subcontractors, additional sheets showing the required information, as indicated below, shall be attached hereto and made a part of this document.

Listed below is the name of each subcontractor that will perform work, labor, or render services to the undersigned related to the work of this project. This is to include any subcontractor that will specially fabricate and install a portion of work according to detailed drawings contained in the plans and specifications in the amount greater than one half of one percent (.05%) of the contractors total bid. Additional sheets may be attached if needed.

Subcontractor Name: Location:

Portion of Work/Trade: Bid Amount
Contractor’s License Number DIR Registration No.

Subcontractor Name: Location:

Portion of Work/Trade: Bid Amount:

Contractor’s License No: DIR Registration No:
 Contractor will not be subcontracting any portion of work.

THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT F

SUBCONTRACTOR DESIGNATION FORM
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 159 /4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the California Air Resources Board’s policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the “Regulation”). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder’s fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) (“Fleet”) is true and correct:
 The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto.
 The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto.  Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. third-party correspondence or vendor bids).  The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regulation pursuant to section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an Emergency, as defined under section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained, pursuant to section 2449(i)(4).
 The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempted and a detailed reasoning is attached hereto.
_________________________________________________________________ Bidder’s Company Name (please print or type)
__________________________________________________________________ Signature of Bidder
__________________________________________________________________ Print Name
__________________________________________________________________ Title
___________________________________

DOORS ID
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT G

CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 160 /4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
This is to certify that the undersigned Proposer and subconsultants have read and undertand the CWA entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, and the signatory Craft Councils and Local Unions, effective as of June 6, 2023. The Undersigned Proposer hereby agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the CWA, and are capable of completing construction of the project continuously, without interruptions or delays. If awarded any work covered by the CWA, Proposer will also be required to sign a Letter of Assent that appears as Attachment A to the CWA documents.

Signed:

Title:

Firm:

Date:

THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT H

STATEMENT REGARDING COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA)

REQUIREMENTS
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 161 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
On April 4, 2022, the federal government stopped using the DUNS Number to uniquely identify entities.

Now, entities doing business with the federal government use the Unique Entity ID created in SAM.gov.

They no longer have to go to a third-party website to obtain their identifier. This transition allows the government to streamline the entity identification and validation process, making it easier and less burdensome for entities to do business with the federal government.

This RFP includes federal funding, and as such, the proposer must provide verification of their SAM.gov UEI and registration status. Please attach your entity’s registration from SAM.gov, including UEI and active registration status.

Proposer’s UEI:_______________________________________________ SAM.gov Registration Expiration Date:

ATTACHMENT I
SAM.GOV UEI VERIFICATION
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 162 /4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, as amended, Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension, 2 CFR Part 2998, Subpart C, Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions. The regulations were published as Part VII of the May 26, 1988, Federal Register (Pages 19160-19211), and as subsequently amended in 81 Federal Register 25585. (Before completing certification, read instructions which are an integral part of certification)

1. Pursuant to 2 CFR 180.335, the prospective primary participant, (i.e. grantee) certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
a. Are not presently excluded or disqualified;
b. Have not been convicted within the preceding three years of any of the offenses listed in 2CFR 180.800(a) or had a civil judgment rendered against them for one of those offenses within that time period.
c. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses listed in 2 CFR 180.800(a);and
d. Have not had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated within the preceding three years for cause or default.

2. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

Consultant
Name and Title of Official Authorized to Certify
On Behalf of the Consultant
Date
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT J

CERTIFICATE REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INEGIBILITY AND

VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 163 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

INSTRUCTION FOR CERTIFICATION

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds is providing the certification as set out below.

2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the Department of Labor (DOL) may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment.

3. The prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds learns that its certification was erroneous whom submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

4. The terms “covered transaction”, “debarment”, “suspension”, “disqualified,” “ineligible”, “lower tier covered transaction”, “participant”, “person”, “primary covered transaction”, “principal”, “proposal”, and “voluntarily excluded”, as used in this cause, have the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of rules implementing Executive Order 12549. You may contact the person to whom this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

5. The prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, disqualified, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the DOL.

6. The prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds agrees by submitting this proposal, that it will include the clause title “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction” unless it knows that the certification is erroneous.

7. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

8. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntary excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the DOL may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 164 /4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
(Refer to the following Forms)

ATTACHMENT K
FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS – CALTRANS FORMS
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 165 /4/2026
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-I
Notice to Proposers DBE Information

January 2025
Exhibit 10-I: Notice to Proposers DBE Information
(federally funded projects only)
The Local Public Agency (LPA) has established a DBE goal for this Contract of ____________%

1. TERMS AS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT
• The term “Disadvantaged Business Enterprise” or “DBE” means a for-profit small business concern owned and controlled by a socially and economically disadvantaged person(s) as defined in Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 26.5.
• The term “Agreement” also means “Contract.”
• LPA also means the local entity entering into this contract with the Contractor or Consultant. • The term “Small Business” or “SB” is as defined in 49 CFR 26.65.

2. AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY
A. DBEs and other small businesses are strongly encouraged to participate in the performance of Contracts financed in whole or in part with federal funds (see 49 CFR 26: Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Financial Assistance Programs).

The Consultant must ensure that DBEs and other small businesses have the opportunity to participate in the performance of the work that is the subject of this solicitation and should take all necessary and reasonable steps for this assurance. The proposer must not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of subcontracts.

B. Proposers are encouraged to use services offered by financial institutions owned and controlled by DBEs.

3. SUBMISSION OF DBE INFORMATION
If there is a DBE goal on the contract, Exhibit 10-O1: Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment must be included in the Proposal. In order for a proposer to be considered responsible and responsive, the proposer must make good faith efforts to meet the goal established for the contract. If the goal is not met, the proposer must document adequate good faith efforts. All DBE participation will be counted towards meeting the contract goal; therefore, all DBE participation must be collected and reported.

Exhibit 10-O2: Consultant Contract DBE Information must be included in best qualified consultant’s executed consultant contract. Even if no DBE participation will be reported, the successful proposer must execute and return the form.

4. DBE PARTICIPATION GENERAL INFORMATION
It is the proposer’s responsibility to be fully informed regarding the requirements of 49 CFR 26, and the Department’s DBE program developed pursuant to the regulations. Particular attention is directed to the following:

A. A DBE must be a small business firm defined pursuant to 13 CFR 121 and be certified through the California Unified Certification Program (CUCP).

B. A certified DBE may participate as a prime consultant, subconsultant, joint venture partner, as a vendor of material or supplies, or as a trucking company.

C. A DBE proposer not proposing as a joint venture with a non-DBE, will be required to document one or a combination of the following:

1. The proposer is a DBE and will meet the goal by performing work with its own forces.

EXHIBIT 2

4.00 City Council 23 – 166 8/4/2026
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-I
Notice to Proposers DBE Information

January 2025

2. The proposer will meet the goal through work performed by DBE subconsultants, suppliers or trucking companies.

3. The proposer, prior to proposing, made adequate good faith efforts to meet the goal.

D. A DBE joint venture partner must be responsible for specific contract items of work or clearly defined portions thereof. Responsibility means actually performing, managing, and supervising the work with its own forces. The DBE joint venture partner must share in the capital contribution, control, management, risks and profits of the joint venture commensurate with its ownership interest.

E. A DBE must perform a commercially useful function pursuant to 49 CFR 26.55, that is, a DBE firm must be responsible for the execution of a distinct element of the work and must carry out its responsibility by actually performing, managing and supervising the work.

F. The proposer must list only one subconsultant for each portion of work as defined in their proposal and all DBE subconsultants should be listed in the bid/cost proposal list of subconsultants.

G. A prime consultant who is a certified DBE is eligible to claim all of the work in the Contract toward the DBE participation except that portion of the work to be performed by non-DBE subconsultants.

5. COUNTING DBE PARTICIPATION
Materials or supplies purchased from DBEs count towards the DBE goal under the following conditions:

A. If the materials or supplies are obtained from a DBE manufacturer, count 100 percent of the cost of the materials or supplies. A DBE manufacturer is a firm that operates or maintains a factory, or establishment that produces on the premises the materials, supplies, articles, or equipment required under the Contract and of the general character described by the specifications.

B. If the materials or supplies purchased from a DBE regular dealer, count 60 percent of the cost of the materials or supplies. A DBE regular dealer is a firm that owns, operates or maintains a store, warehouse, or other establishment in which the materials, supplies, articles or equipment of the general character described by the specifications and required under the Contract are bought, kept in stock, and regularly sold or leased to the public in the usual course of business. To be a DBE regular dealer, the firm must be an established, regular business that engages, as its principal business and under its own name, in the purchase and sale or lease of the products in question. A person may be a DBE regular dealer in such bulk items as petroleum products, steel, cement, gravel, stone or asphalt without owning, operating or maintaining a place of business provided in this section.

C. If the person both owns and operates distribution equipment for the products, any supplementing of regular dealers’ own distribution equipment must be, by a long-term lease agreement and not an ad hoc or Agreement-by-Agreement basis. Packagers, brokers, manufacturers’ representatives, or other persons who arrange or expedite transactions are not DBE regular dealers within the meaning of this section.

D. Materials or supplies purchased from a DBE, which is neither a manufacturer nor a regular dealer, will be limited to the entire amount of fees or commissions charged for assistance in the procurement of the materials and supplies, or fees or transportation charges for the delivery of materials or supplies required on the job site, provided the fees are reasonable and not excessive as compared with fees charged for similar services

6. RESOURCES
A. The CUCP database includes the certified DBEs from all certifying agencies participating in the CUCP. If you believe a firm is certified that cannot be located on the database, please email [email protected] for assistance.

B. Access the CUCP database from the Department of Transportation, Office of Civil Rights website. For guidance on how to search for certified firms using the CUCP database, please visit: DBE Goal Setting | Caltrans
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 167 8/4/2026

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-O1
Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment
EXHIBIT 10-O1 CONSULTANT PROPOSAL DBE COMMITMENT

1. Local Agency: 2. Contract DBE Goal:

3. Project Description:

4. Project Location:

5. Consultant's Name: 6. Prime Certified DBE: 

7. Description of Work, Service, or Materials
Supplied

8. DBE
Certification
Number
Local Agency to Complete this Section

17. Local Agency Contract Number:

18. Federal-Aid Project Number:

19. Proposed Contract Execution Date:

20. 21. Local Agency Representative's Signature 22. Date

23. Local Agency Representative's Name 24. Phone

25. Local Agency Representative's Title
Consultant’s Ranking after Evaluation: __________________________ Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on this form is complete and accurate.

9. DBE Contact Information

11. TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION

10. DBE %
%
IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, regardless of tier. Written confirmation of each listed DBE is required.

12. Preparer's Signature 13. Date

14. Preparer's Name 15. Phone

16. Preparer's Title
DISTRIBUTION: Original – Included with consultant’s proposal to local agency.

ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.

LPP 18-01 Page 1 of 2
January 2019
EXHIBIT 2
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program for eight (8) bridges City of Santa Ana 4% Various Locations in Santa Ana City Council 23 – 168 8/4/2026

Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-O1
Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment
INSTRUCTIONS – CONSULTANT PROPOSAL DBE COMMITMENT

CONSULTANT SECTION

1. Local Agency - Enter the name of the local or regional agency that is funding the contract.

2. Contract DBE Goal - Enter the contract DBE goal percentage as it appears on the project advertisement.

3. Project Location - Enter the project location as it appears on the project advertisement.

4. Project Description - Enter the project description as it appears on the project advertisement (Bridge Rehab, Seismic Rehab, Overlay, Widening, etc.).

5. Consultant’s Name - Enter the consultant’s firm name.

6. Prime Certified DBE - Check box if prime contractor is a certified DBE.

7. Description of Work, Services, or Materials Supplied - Enter description of work, services, or materials to be provided. Indicate all work to be performed by DBEs including work performed by the prime consultant’s own forces, if the prime is a DBE. If 100% of the item is not to be performed or furnished by the DBE, describe the exact portion to be performed or furnished by the DBE. See LAPM Chapter 9 to determine how to count the participation of DBE firms.

8. DBE Certification Number - Enter the DBE’s Certification Identification Number. All DBEs must be certified on the date bids are opened.

9. DBE Contact Information - Enter the name, address, and phone number of all DBE subcontracted consultants.

Also, enter the prime consultant’s name and phone number, if the prime is a DBE.

10. DBE % - Percent participation of work to be performed or service provided by a DBE. Include the prime consultant if the prime is a DBE. See LAPM Chapter 9 for how to count full/partial participation.

11. Total Claimed DBE Participation % - Enter the total DBE participation claimed. If the total % claimed is less than item “Contract DBE Goal,” an adequately documented Good Faith Effort (GFE) is required (see Exhibit 15-H DBE Information - Good Faith Efforts of the LAPM).

12. Preparer’s Signature - The person completing the DBE commitment form on behalf of the consultant’s firm must sign their name.

13. Date - Enter the date the DBE commitment form is signed by the consultant’s preparer.

14. Preparer’s Name - Enter the name of the person preparing and signing the consultant’s DBE commitment form.

15. Phone - Enter the area code and phone number of the person signing the consultant’s DBE commitment form.

16. Preparer’s Title - Enter the position/title of the person signing the consultant’s DBE commitment form.

LOCAL AGENCY SECTION

17. Local Agency Contract Number - Enter the Local Agency contract number or identifier.

18. Federal-Aid Project Number - Enter the Federal-Aid Project Number.

19. Proposed Contract Execution Date - Enter the proposed contract execution date.

20. Consultant’s Ranking after Evaluation – Enter consultant’s ranking after all submittals/consultants are evaluated. Use this as a quick comparison for evaluating most qualified consultant.

21. Local Agency Representative’s Signature - The person completing this section of the form for the Local Agency must sign their name to certify that the information in this and the Consultant Section of this form is complete and accurate.

22. Date - Enter the date the DBE commitment form is signed by the Local Agency Representative.

23. Local Agency Representative’s Name - Enter the name of the Local Agency Representative certifying the consultant’s DBE commitment form.

24. Phone - Enter the area code and phone number of the person signing the consultant’s DBE commitment form.

25. Local Agency Representative Title - Enter the position/title of the Local Agency Representative certifying the consultant’s DBE commitment form.

LPP 18-01 Page 2 of 2
January 2019
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 169 8/4/2026
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-O2
Consultant Contract DBE Commitment
EXHIBIT 10-O2 CONSULTANT CONTRACT DBE COMMITMENT

1. Local Agency: 2. Contract DBE Goal:

3. Project Description:

4. Project Location:

5. Consultant's Name: 6. Prime Certified DBE:  7. Total Contract Award Amount:

8. Total Dollar Amount for ALL Subconsultants: 9. Total Number of ALL Subconsultants:

10. Description of Work, Service, or Materials
Supplied

11. DBE
Certification
Number

12. DBE Contact Information

13. DBE
Dollar
Amount
Local Agency to Complete this Section

14. TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION

20. Local Agency Contract
Number:

21. Federal-Aid Project Number:

22. Contract Execution
Date:

Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on this form is complete and accurate.

23. Local Agency Representative's Signature 24. Date

25. Local Agency Representative's Name 26. Phone

27. Local Agency Representative's Title
%
IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, regardless of tier. Written confirmation of each listed DBE is required.

15. Preparer's Signature 16. Date

17. Preparer's Name 18. Phone

19. Preparer's Title
DISTRIBUTION: 1. Original – Local Agency

2. Copy – Caltrans District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE). Failure to submit to DLAE within 30 days of contract execution may result in de-obligation of federal funds on contract.

ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.

July 23, 2015
EXHIBIT 2
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program for eight (8) bridges City of Santa Ana 4% Various Locations in Santa Ana City Council 23 – 170 8/4/2026
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-O2
Consultant Contract DBE Commitment
INSTRUCTIONS – CONSULTANT CONTRACT DBE COMMITMENT

CONSULTANT SECTION

1. Local Agency - Enter the name of the local or regional agency that is funding the contract.

2. Contract DBE Goal - Enter the contract DBE goal percentage as it appears on the project advertisement.

3. Project Description - Enter the project description as it appears on the project advertisement (Bridge Rehab, Seismic Rehab, Overlay, Widening, etc).

4. Project Location - Enter the project location as it appears on the project advertisement.

5. Consultant’s Name - Enter the consultant’s firm name.

6. Prime Certified DBE - Check box if prime contractor is a certified DBE.

7. Total Contract Award Amount - Enter the total contract award dollar amount for the prime consultant.

8. Total Dollar Amount for ALL Subconsultants – Enter the total dollar amount for all subcontracted consultants.

SUM = (DBEs + all Non-DBEs). Do not include the prime consultant information in this count.

9. Total number of ALL subconsultants – Enter the total number of all subcontracted consultants. SUM = (DBEs + all Non-DBEs). Do not include the prime consultant information in this count.

10. Description of Work, Services, or Materials Supplied - Enter description of work, services, or materials to be provided. Indicate all work to be performed by DBEs including work performed by the prime consultant’s own forces, if the prime is a DBE. If 100% of the item is not to be performed or furnished by the DBE, describe the exact portion to be performed or furnished by the DBE. See LAPM Chapter 9 to determine how to count the participation of DBE firms.

11. DBE Certification Number - Enter the DBE’s Certification Identification Number. All DBEs must be certified on the date bids are opened.

12. DBE Contact Information - Enter the name, address, and phone number of all DBE subcontracted consultants.

Also, enter the prime consultant’s name and phone number, if the prime is a DBE.

13. DBE Dollar Amount - Enter the subcontracted dollar amount of the work to be performed or service to be provided. Include the prime consultant if the prime is a DBE. See LAPM Chapter 9 for how to count full/partial participation.

14. Total Claimed DBE Participation - $: Enter the total dollar amounts entered in the “DBE Dollar Amount” column. %: Enter the total DBE participation claimed (“Total Participation Dollars Claimed” divided by item “Total Contract Award Amount”). If the total % claimed is less than item “Contract DBE Goal,” an adequately documented Good Faith Effort (GFE) is required (see Exhibit 15-H DBE Information - Good Faith Efforts of the LAPM).

15. Preparer’s Signature - The person completing the DBE commitment form on behalf of the consultant’s firm must sign their name.

16. Date - Enter the date the DBE commitment form is signed by the consultant’s preparer.

17. Preparer’s Name - Enter the name of the person preparing and signing the consultant’s DBE commitment form.

18. Phone - Enter the area code and phone number of the person signing the consultant’s DBE commitment form.

19. Preparer’s Title - Enter the position/title of the person signing the consultant’s DBE commitment form.

LOCAL AGENCY SECTION

20. Local Agency Contract Number - Enter the Local Agency contract number or identifier.

21. Federal-Aid Project Number - Enter the Federal-Aid Project Number.

22. Contract Execution Date - Enter the date the contract was executed.

23. Local Agency Representative’s Signature - The person completing this section of the form for the Local Agency must sign their name to certify that the information in this and the Consultant Section of this form is complete and accurate.

24. Date - Enter the date the DBE commitment form is signed by the Local Agency Representative.

25. Local Agency Representative’s Name - Enter the name of the Local Agency Representative certifying the consultant’s DBE commitment form.

26. Phone - Enter the area code and phone number of the person signing the consultant’s DBE commitment form.

27. Local Agency Representative Title - Enter the position/title of the Local Agency Representative certifying the consultant’s DBE commitment form.

July 23, 2015
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 171 8/4/2026
SUBMITTED BY:

Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE
Project Manager
1450 Frazee Road, Suite 100
San Diego, CA 92108
(858) 514-8377
[email protected]
SUBMITTED ON:

July 8, 2025

BRIDGE PREVENTATIVE

MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
RFP NO. 25-081A

PROPOSAL
SUBMITTED TO:

ALEXANDRU BANGEAN, PE

SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER
CITY OF SANTA ANA – M-36
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA
SANTA ANA, CA 92701
EXHIBIT 3
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 172 8/4/2026
101 Pacifica, Suite 30, Irvine, CA 92618 ● Tele: 858.514.8377 ● Fax: 858.514.8608 ● www.dokkenengineering.com

DOKKEN ENGINEERING
Transportation Solutions from Concept to Construction
Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE | Project Manager
Address: 1450 Frazee Road, Suite 100
San Diego, CA 92108
Telephone: (858) 514-8377
Fax: (858) 514-8608
Mobile: (541) 602-2960
E-Mail: [email protected]
July 8, 2025 DOKKEN ENGINEERING CONTACT
Mr. Alexandru Bangean, Senior Civil Engineer
City of Santa Ana – M-36
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
RE: Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
BPMP RFP No. 25-081A
Dear Mr. Bangean:

We are excited to grow our relationship with the City of Santa Ana. We have worked with many cities and agencies including City of Palm Desert, City of Carlsbad, Orange County, Tulare County and others where we have demonstrated our ability to deliver similar projects on schedule and on budget. We have a strong history of urban projects and understand the needs of the area.

Dokken Engineering (Dokken) is pleased to submit to the City one (1) hard copy and one (1) digital copy of our proposal to provide Professional Engineering Services for the Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program. We wish to express our enthusiasm and commitment to deliver this proposal. Dokken has teamed with Burne Engineering to support engineering services, Geocon Consultants Inc. for Hazardous Materials Investigations and Optime Consulting Group for bridge deck testing to deliver a solution that meets the City’s needs, complying with Federal Highway Administration and Caltrans Local Assistance Requirements.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE | We have extensive recent experience completing Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) projects similar to the City’s proposed improvements. Dokken has been working with the City of Carlsbad on BPMP since 2016, including PS&E for preventative maintenance of the Calle Barcelona Pedestrian Overcrossing, Jefferson Street Bridge, El Camino Real Bridge among other bridges involving methacrylate deck overlays. We are providing additional engineering services for Orange County, Tulare County and the City of Palm Desert for bridge maintenance projects that also include methacrylate overlay and additional bridge preventive maintenance work. Burne Engineering has joined our team to supplement our experience and expertise having recently completed PS&E for Calaveras County with similar BPMP efforts.

Our combined experience will be key for the success and delivery of this project.

The key staff and subconsultants proposed for this project have worked on similar recently completed HBP BPMP projects.

Their collective understanding and experience with the HBP and Caltrans Local Assistance will ensure the project is delivered in full compliance with the program and participating funding is maximized. Their experience working in urban areas will be an additional asset to provide a more succinct design meeting the needs of the City as well as the motorists and users within the project area.

PROJECT MANAGEMENT | Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE will lead the project delivery team as the Project Manager. Gabriel has experience managing design teams for PS&E packages for many cities. He is well versed in coordinating with, State agencies, Counties and Cities. He has experience ensuring the projects meet the federal and state requirements for local agencies to meet funding and application requirements. Gabriel provides local agencies with scheduling and project management services, ensuring the project schedule is maintained, and all submittals are made in full compliance with Caltrans Local Assistance and the HBP program.

PROJECT APPROACH | The Dokken team has visited and researched the project sites and reviewed the bridge inspection reports to develop an approach to best deliver this project for the City.

Based on the recommendations in the most recent bridge inspection reports, it is anticipated that work is to be performed both on the bridge deck as well as on the substructure or girders. Bridge deck work includes applying methacrylate to the deck surfaces and replacing joint seals. Substructure and girder work includes spall repair, cleaning and painting of steel components and debris removal.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 173 8/4/2026
101 Pacifica, Suite 30, Irvine, CA 92618 ● Tele: 858.514.8377 ● Fax: 858.514.8608 ● www.dokkenengineering.com

DOKKEN ENGINEERING
Transportation Solutions from Concept to Construction
Bridge deck work will require staged signing and traffic handling to maintain traffic operations during construction.

Performing work underneath the bridge will utilize encroachment and environmental permits to allow construction access and work to be performed within the channels.

Based on parcel data available, river and creek channels are within either City, Orange County Flood Control District or County Right-of-Way. Additionally, we anticipate that signage and partial roadway closures will encroach into Caltrans Right-of-Way. This stresses the importance of communication with all shareholders and early identification and resolution of potential issues early to maintain schedule.

We have identified key project issues and solutions from a wholistic approach to ensure we meet the needs and goals of the City and all other shareholders. A top priority is to ensure we are meeting the federal and state requirements, frequent communication with all parties, identifying key issues and solutions early, to ensure the project stays on schedule.

INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS | Bridge Preventative Maintenance may imply routine or basic work; however, we still look for opportunities to innovate regardless of the scope of work. We believe the importance of brainstorming and evaluating alternative solutions of how work can be performed to explore innovative concepts to avoid pre-packaged solutions. Some examples may include:
• Group separate bid packages for bridges based on similar scope and schedule to expedite project completion. • Specify unconventional construction methods to eliminate major environmental and ROW impacts. • Allow for detours, or night closures to expedite and simplify construction.

Dokken Engineering’s mission is to provide superior service to our clients for all their transportation and related civil engineering needs. We strive to be responsive and flexible to our clients, which results in projects being delivered on time and within budget. We appreciate your consideration of our proposal, and we are very excited for this opportunity to work with the City of Santa Ana.

Sincerely,

DOKKEN ENGINEERING
Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE John A. Klemunes, Jr., PE
Project Manager President
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 174 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Services Provided ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Agreement Statement ................................................................................................................................................... 9 Firm and Team Experience ............................................................................................................................................. 9 • Project Organization Chart ........................................................................................................................................ 11 • Resumes for Key Personnel ....................................................................................................................................... 12 Proposed Work Plan ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 References .................................................................................................................................................................... 27 CARB Fleet Compliance ................................................................................................................................................. 29 Attachments
• Attachment A: Proposer’s Certification, Proposal Pricing • Attachment B: Proposer’s Statement
• Attachment C: Non-Collusion Affidavit
• Attachment D: Non-Lobbying Certification
• Attachment E: Non-Discrimination Certification
• Attachment F: Subcontractor Designation Form
• Attachment G: CARB Fleet Compliance Certification
• Attachment H: Statement Regarding Community Workforce Agreement (CWA) Requirements • Attachment I: SAM.gov UEI Verification
• Attachment J: Certificate Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion • Attachment K: Federal Funding Requirements – Caltrans Forms EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 175 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 1

SERVICES PROVIDED
TASK 1 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT (30% PLANS)
Task 1.1 Project Coordination
Dokken Engineering’s project management will include regular virtual meetings, in-person deliveries, presentation of work products, development and monitoring of action items, monthly progress reports, work progress monitoring, budget monitoring, coordination and communication. Monthly Project Delivery Team (PDT) meetings will be held with City staff and other representatives, as necessary, to discuss work progress, decisions made, schedule and considerations for the City.

The Dokken Project Manager will work closely with the City Project Manager and continuously inform the City Project Manager of all project activities. The duration of the project management effort is expected to be continuous through completion of the job. Project management will include: leading, directing and monitoring the Dokken team; preparing for, attending, and documenting team meetings and action items; preparing, coordinating, and maintaining a critical path method schedule; preparing monthly progress reports, invoices and specific work completed; and miscellaneous coordination and support.

Coordination – Close contact will be maintained between the Dokken Project Manager, all subconsultants, the City Project Manager, project personnel, and regulatory agencies. The Dokken Project Manager will act as the principal liaison between the City and staff at Dokken.

Communication – Effective communication through in-person visits, focused meetings, telephone calls and e-mails to the City will be performed to discuss specific project issues by the Project Manager. Regular communication with team members, the City and other agency personnel will be facilitated through the Dokken Project Manager.

Progress reports will be submitted monthly to the City. These reports will include the work performed during that period, a discussion of issues/decisions, recommendations to address issues, budget status, and anticipated work for the following month. The progress report will be submitted with the monthly invoice. Dokken’s Project Manager is responsible for maintaining cost control for each task, including our subconsultants.

Project Schedule - Dokken will provide and maintain a detailed Milestone Schedule for the bridge and a less detailed program wide Microsoft Project Schedule. The Milestone Schedule is a simple one page schedule to assist in project communication Dokken’s Project Manager will closely monitor the schedules and discuss updates with the City Project Manager.

Task 1.1 Deliverables: Monthly Progress Report and Invoice; Meeting Agendas and Minutes; Action Item Lists; RFA and HBP Funding Support Information; Project Schedule
TASK 1.2 RECORDS RESEARCH
Dokken Engineering will research all information pertinent to the project such as existing field conditions, as-built plans and record drawings right-of-way and parcel data, and all future improvement plans adjacent to or affecting the project site.

Dokken Engineering will identify all existing and proposed facilities within the project limits and potential conflicts.

TASK 1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE
Task 1.3.1 Preliminary Environmental Study (PES)
Dokken will prepare a draft PES Form and will coordinate with Caltrans to setup a field review prior to approval of the PES Forms. The PES Form will include an environmental study area map as well as an environmental constraints analysis to identify key environmental impacts that could occur during construction. Once the draft PES Form is completed, it will be reviewed by the City and Caltrans. The PES form will outline the recommended federal environmental documentation, technical studies, surveys, approvals, agency coordination, and permits required for the Project.

Task 1.3.1 Deliverables: Preliminary Environmental Study TASK 1.3.2 Field Investigations and Hazardous Material Surveys Geocon will assess each of the eight bridge locations (the sites) within the City.

TASK 1.3.2.1 Phase I Initial Site Assessment (ISA)
Dokken Engineering’s sub consultant, Geocon, will perform an Initial Site Assessment (ISA) will be to determine the potential presence of environmental concerns and contaminated properties at the sites that may impact maintenance at each location.

The primary purpose of the ISA is to assess the sites for the potential presence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs) (i.e., levels of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products warranting regulatory cleanup action) and the uses and conditions at properties and facilities in the site vicinities with the potential to cause (or have caused) an REC at the sites. For the purposes of this ISA, the “vicinity” of the sites is defined as properties/facilities within 1/8 mile of the sites. The ISA will EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 176 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 2
be performed in general accordance with the ASTM International (ASTM) Designation E 1527-21 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. Potential environmental concerns and contaminated properties that are determined to potentially pose a significant impact to the planned improvements would be further evaluated during a subsequent (Phase II) Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI).

As part of the Phase I ISA, Geocon will perform the following services including:
• Perform a reconnaissance of the sites to assess for the presence, or make visual observations of indicators of the potential presence, of RECs on the sites. These indicators may include 55-gallon drums, underground and aboveground storage tanks, chemical containers, waste storage and disposal areas, industrial facilities, discolored surficial soils, electrical transformers that may contain polychlorinated biphenyls, and areas conspicuously absent of vegetation. If access is unavailable to any portions of the sites, our ability to complete the assessment described herein may be hindered.

Assessment of the sites for wetlands, asbestos-containing building materials, lead-containing paint, lead in drinking water, radon, methane gas, and naturally occurring substances such as arsenic and asbestos are not included in the ISA services.
• Perform a visual survey of adjoining and adjacent properties from the sites and from public thoroughfares to observe general types of land use and conditions surrounding the sites. • Review the Standard Environmental Records Sources: Federal and State as referenced in ASTM Designation E 1527-21 to obtain information regarding the potential presence of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products on the sites or on properties within the approximate minimum search distance specified for each source, reviewing reasonably ascertainable regulatory agency files for the sites and documented hazardous substance and/or petroleum product release locations near the sites. The sources for these files could include the local department of environmental health, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control. • Review pertinent and reasonably ascertainable information sources to evaluate physiographic, geologic, and hydrogeologic conditions in the vicinity of the sites.
• Review and interpret reasonably ascertainable historical aerial photographs to obtain information concerning the historical use of the sites and adjacent properties.
• Review historical United States Geological Survey topographic maps to obtain information relative to the topography of the sites, as well as previous development and uses of the sites and properties located in the vicinity of the sites. • Review documents provided by the Client. Potentially useful documents may include geotechnical, geologic, and environmental reports, site plans, plot plans, and correspondence with regulatory agencies. • Prepare a report summarizing the findings of the ISA for the sites and qualitatively describing existing, or the potential for, RECs on the sites.

TASK 1.3.2.2 Phase II Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI) Report (OPTIONAL) Should the results of the Phase I ISA determine that additional testing is necessary, Dokken Engineering’s sub consultant, Geocon, will perform a Phase II testing and Site Investigation Report (PSI). The purpose of the Phase II PSI is to preliminarily characterize hazardous materials that may be encountered during construction. The findings will be used to evaluate material disposal options and worker health and safety. The specific scope of the Phase II PSI should be determined after completion of the Phase I ISA and after the 30% design submittal is complete. The PSI will focus on the following two primary potential issues: Aesbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) and Lead-Containing Paint (LCP) on the bridges. Geocon will prepare a projectspecific Health & Safety Plan and Preliminary Site Investigation Workplan for Client and Caltrans concurrence prior to fieldwork. Dokken anticipates that traffic control will be necessary to safely perform the field sampling.

Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM)/Lead-Containing Paint (LCP) Survey Geocon will provide services including:
• Conduct asbestos and LCP surveys of the eight bridge structures; • Collect up to 160 bulk material samples for asbestos analysis by polarized light microscopy (PLM); • Additionally analyze up to 24 of the bulk asbestos samples by PLM point count methodology (1,000 points); • Collect up to 32 samples of paint for lead analysis by USEPA Test Method 6010B; • Analyze up to 20 of the paint samples for soluble lead using the WET and 20 of the paint samples for soluble lead using the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure test; and • Prepare an asbestos and LCP survey report.

During the asbestos and LCP survey, our staff will:
• Conduct a walkthrough inspection of the bridge structures to identify and inventory suspect ACM and potential LCP.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 177 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 3
• Collect representative bulk samples of suspect ACM and submit using chain-of-custody (COC) documentation to a laboratory accredited under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Plan for the analysis of asbestos in bulk material samples.
• Analyze suspect ACM samples collected during the surveys on a 5-day turnaround time using PLM according to the EPArecommended method. • Collect bulk samples of potential LCP using techniques presented in United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines. In addition, each painted area sampled will be evaluated for evidence of deterioration such as flaking or cracking.
• Submit paint samples to a California-licensed and California State Water Resources Control Board-accredited laboratory for lead analyses in accordance with USEPA Test Method 6010B under COC documentation on a 5-day turnaround time. • Prepare one electronic version of a final asbestos and LCP survey report that will include a general property description, sample/laboratory analytical results, ACM and deteriorated LCP quantities, types, condition, and locations, photographs of identified ACM and LCP, and inspector/laboratory certification data. A bridge structure drawing illustrating sample locations will also be included in the report. The drawing will be proportional, but not to-scale.

A reasonable effort will be made to identify suspect ACMs and LCPs. However, this does not imply a guarantee that all possible sources will be identified as certain materials may be hidden by structural materials or may be otherwise inaccessible. During future renovation or demolition operations, suspect ACMs and potential LCP may be uncovered.

These materials should be treated as ACM and LCP, respectively, until evaluation, sampling, and analysis indicate otherwise.

Task 1.3.2 Deliverables: Phase I Initial Site Assessment (ISA) Report; Phase II Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI) report Task 1.3.3 Natural Environmental Study (Minimal Impacts) A Dokken biologist will conduct fieldwork in order to assess the presence/absence of sensitive biological resources (e.g., species or habitats), or to determine the potential for occurrence of such resources. A literature search will be conducted.

The location of any sensitive biological resources in the study area, including plants and plant communities, will be mapped.

Surveys will be timed for the appropriate season, e.g. plant surveys during the blooming season.

A Natural Environment Study (Minimal Impacts) (NES(MI)) in the current Caltrans format will be prepared. The field methods will be described along with the field survey and literature search results. Plant and animal species observed will be listed, along with a general description of vegetative communities. Sensitive resources found will be mapped and evaluated in the NES(MI). The report will contain tables describing sensitive species and their habitats that are present or potentially present; it will identify and assess project impacts on the existing biological resources, including any sensitive species. Mitigation measures will be included as necessary.

Task 1.3.3 Deliverables: Natural Environment Study (Minimal Impacts) Task 1.3.4 Cultural Resources/Section 106 Compliance
BPMP activities are oftentimes considered a “screened undertaking” and may be exempt from the Caltrans Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) compliance process. Dokken will coordinate with Caltrans to determine if the proposed project activities qualify for a screened undertaking, which many involve some preliminary research, including a records search through the California Historical Resources Inventory System (CHRIS). Should Caltrans not agree that the project qualifies as a screened undertaking, Dokken will conduct Section 106 of the NHPA cultural resource identification efforts. These efforts include delineation of an Area of Potential Effects (APE), Native American Heritage Commission Sacred Lands File Search, CHRIS records search, historical research, Native American consultation, a pedestrian survey, and preliminary assessment of buried site potential within the APE. The results of the identification efforts will be documented in an Archaeological Survey Report (ASR) and Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR). This task assumes that no cultural resources that require recordation and evaluation for the National Register of Historic Places will be identified within the APE.

Although the project may qualify for a CEQA exemption which does not require CEQA Native American consultation, should the City request it, Dokken can assist with the preparation of Project Notification Letters, per California Public Resources Code (PRC) §21080.3.1 (also referred to as AB 52). Dokken can assist the City with subsequent Native American consultation meetings, requests, and recommendations conducted under both Section 106 of the NHPA and PRC §21080.3.1 (AB 52).

Task 1.3.4 Deliverables: Historic Property Survey/Archaeological Survey Report, Record Search, Native American Consultation Log
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 178 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 4
Task 1.3.5 Section 4(f)/Section 6(f) Documentation
Dokken will coordinate with Caltrans and the City to verify that the project meets the definition of “temporary occupancy” for the purposes of completing the Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) documentation. Because the bridges are elevated over the parks and trails, except the W MacArthur Blvd bridge, the maintenance work does not conflict with the use of the parks or trails. A de minimis level of documentation is not anticipated. A letter report or memorandum will be prepared to document the findings and concurrence on the temporary occupancy finding will be requested from the official with jurisdiction over the parks and trails.

Task 1.3.5 Deliverables: Section 4(f) and Section 6(f) Documentation Task 1.3.6 Water Quality Assessment Memorandum
Dokken will prepare a Water Quality Assessment Report to address the potential for project impacts on water quality based on current Caltrans guidelines (Environmental Handbook Volume 1, Chapter 9, Water Quality). The report will discuss the waters within the project areas and the receiving waters conditions, objectives, and beneficial uses as well as Caltrans standard best management practices (BMPs) and project design features required in accordance with the current Caltrans Statewide Storm Water Management Plan. This scope and fee assumes that a full Water Quality Assessment Report will not be required by Caltrans.

Task 1.3.6 Deliverables: Water Quality Assessment Memorandum Task 1.3.7 CEQA Notice of Exemption (NOE) Form and Evaluation Letter; NEPA Categorical Exclusion Based on identified type of maintenance work identified in the BPMP Plan and preliminary research, the proposed project qualifies for CEQA categorical exemption 15301 for existing facilities. Dokken Engineering will prepare a letter that evaluates whether there are any exceptions that would preclude the use of the CEQA exemption. If no exceptions exist, a CEQA Notice of Exemption (NOE) for will be prepared for the City to file NOE. Dokken will file the NOE with the State Clearinghouse. This scope and fee include the $50.00 filing fee. Dokken will work with Caltrans Local Assistance to prepare a Categorical Exclusion as the NEPA approval document for the project and will include avoidance, minimization and mitigation measures provided in the technical studies prepared.

Task 1.3.7 Deliverables: Notice of Exemption (NOE) Form and Recommendation Letter TASK 1.4 REGULATORY PERMITS
TASK 1.4.1 Section 401 Waste Water Discharge Permit
Below deck work is needed for spall repair; however, such maintenance work of existing, serviceable structures is typically exempt from Section 404 Clean Water Act permitting. Non-exempt work may be authorized under the Regional General Permit (RGP) Number 100 issued to the Orange County Flood Control Division by the Corps of Engineers. Coverage under the RGP requires the filing of a Notice of Intent to the Regional Water Quality Control Board for a Waste Water Discharge Permit and is included in this scope. The Orange County Public Works also has a Streambed Alteration Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife that authorizes OCPW to conduct routine maintenance, and it is assumed the City would prepare the necessary Verification Request Form to submit to CDFW.

Task 1.4.1 Deliverables: RWQCB Notice of Intent and Waste Water Discharge Permit TASK 1.5 PRELIMINARY DESIGN
TASK 1.5.1 Preliminary Design Concept
Dokken will organize a kick-off meeting with the City staff to discuss the conceptual design plan, project goals and objectives, potential elements and issues, schedule, review of existing information, and conduction of a site investigation.

The BPMP Plan includes eight (8) bridges where bridge preventive maintenance is to be performed. Dokken Engineering will field verify the applicability of the maintenance activities listed on the provided 2020 BPMP Plan. Along with the field review and record research, Dokken Engineering will identify any other maintenance work necessary on the listed bridges to bring them to current conformance with the Caltrans inspection criteria and standards.

Based on the results and recommendations from the field review and records research, maintenance activities may get added or removed. The scope of this project will be based off the provided, listed maintenance activities. Activities may be added to or removed from the scope as authorized.

TASK 1.5.2 BRIDGE DECK TESTING (OPTIONAL)
Two bridges (BR# 55C0055 - Main Street at Santiago Creek Channel and BR# 55C0423 - 17th Street at Santa Ana River Channel) have been identified in the inspection reports and BPMP Plan to core the bridge deck and test for chloride content. This investigative work will be included in the scope of this task to determine recommendations based on chloride contents found.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 179 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 5
The recommendations for work activities may be added and included in the PS&E package as performed in Task 2 of this scope.

For the 1973 Main Street bridge deck, twelve (12) 4-inch-diameter cores, spaced at roughly one location per 1,300 ft² will be extracted, and immediately reinstated with rapid-setting patch material to restore traffic by morning. Each core will be sectioned into two depth intervals (0–½ in. and ½–1½ in.) and transferred to an AASHTO-accredited laboratory for ASTM C1152 acid-soluble chloride testing. A California-licensed professional engineer will analyze the chloride-versus-depth data and prepare a signed memorandum projecting remaining time to corrosion initiation and recommending appropriate preservation measures.

For the 17th Street bridge, a structure flagged for more advanced distress, Optime will first complete a 100% delamination sounding and ground‑penetrating‑radar survey to delineate subsurface delamination and thickness variations across the 32,936 ft² deck. Twenty (20) 4‑inch cores (about one per 1,650 ft²) will then be extracted, rapidly patched, and forwarded to the laboratory. All cores will be tested for chloride content in two discrete depth increments, and four strategically selected samples (two from a highly distressed zone and two from a sound zone) will undergo detailed petrographic examination in accordance with ASTM C856 to assess micro‑cracking, aggregate quality, and air‑void parameters. Findings from the nondestructive survey and laboratory analyses will be integrated into a PE‑sealed report that includes a georeferenced deck‑condition map and a decision matrix comparing methacrylate sealing, thin overlay, or partial‑depth repair as the most cost‑effective rehabilitation strategy.

TASK 1.5.3 PHOTO DOCUMENTED BRIDGE ASSESSMENT
There may be additional distress or damage discovered outside of those identified in the Bridge Inspection Reports. Work activities to repair, or to prevent damage from perpetuating further in the future, may be recommended and qualify to include in the project work activities.

For the eight bridges identified in the BPMP plan, Dokken will take photos to document locations where there is existing damage, or where future damage can be mitigated. Dokken will prepare comprehensive photo-documented memorandum with itemized cost estimates detailing recommended bridge preventive maintenance work for each bridge. Dokken will assist the City to submit Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPG) Forms 6A and 6D to request the anticipated funding to accommodate the additional work.

Task 1.5.3 Deliverables: One (1) digital Bridge Assessment Memorandum TASK 1.6 SURVEY
Based on the BPMP plan and bridge inspection reports, the identified work recommendations are limited to structure maintenance activities. Available parcel data indicates work is to be performed within City, Orange County Flood Control District, County, or Caltrans Right-of-Way; therefore no boundary surveys for temporary construction easements are anticipated.

TASK 1.7 WATER QUALITY
Based on the BPMP plan, the work activities identified are limited to structure maintenance. There are no anticipated changes to either the structure, channel, or impervious areas within the project footprint to warrant hydrology or hydraulics analysis.

Dokken will assist the City to complete the internal WQMP/SWPP determination form to determine that the project does not trigger LID or WQMP requirements. Dokken will identify best management practices for implementation in project plans and specifications.

TASK 1.8 PUBLIC OUTREACH
Dokken will assist the City in preparing for and attending a public meeting at the outset of final design to provide a project update to the public and interested stakeholders. Notices would be prepared and sent to all stakeholders and exhibits would be developed to facilitate discussion regarding project details.

TASK 1.9 UTILITY COORDINATION
Based on the work being performed, utility relocations are not expected. It is anticipated that Relocation Claim Letter to Owners (Letter #2) and liability determination will not be necessary.

Utility Base Mapping
Dokken will prepare a letter request for as-builts and facility mapping form each of the utility companies, for the City’s review and approval. Dokken will perform a field review of the project site to ascertain existing conditions compared to the as-built drawings. Using available record drawings, information from the field reconnaissance and utility mark outs, Dokken will prepare a utility base map in CAD format identifying the existing utilities. Utilities will be shown on the project plans where applicable.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 180 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 6
Utility Impact Identification and No Conflicts Letter
Dokken Engineering will review the project improvements against the existing utility base mapping and identify potential utility impacts. Dokken will develop an inventory of potential utility impacts, confirm utility rights with City records, and prepare Utility Notice to Owners – No Conflict (Letter #3) for distribution to pertinent utility companies, if needed.

Task 1.9 Deliverables: Utility Mapping Requests (Letter #1); Existing Utility Base Map; Utility Notice to Owners – No Conflict (Letter #3)
TASK 1.10 30% PLANS SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE (PS&E)
Dokken Engineering will develop schematic plans, which shall include civil design, structural design, draft technical specifications outline and “opinion of estimated cost”. Work activities will include those verified on the provided BPMP Plan List, as well as any additional recommended activities from the project research as agreed upon with the City.

The 30% phase will incorporate recommendations from Project Research to define work activities and project limits. The plans will be prepared based off existing records and as-builts. Any additional work that is not part of the current project scope and the City wishes to include into the project will be discussed during this stage of the project. 30% Plans and Opinion of Probable Cost
Obtain and review all relevant as-built plans and the most recent Caltrans bridge inspection reports to create the preliminary plans of the bridge repairs. Quantities and cost estimates will be prepared for all structures.

Task 1.10 Deliverables: One (1) digital copy of Plans; One (1) digital copy of Opinion of Probable Cost; One (1) digital copy of Draft Technical Specifications Outline
TASK 2 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (60%, 90%, and 100% PS&E) Dokken will integrate Cost Estimates, utility mapping, encroachment permits, and easements as applicable. Dokken will coordinate submittals with the City, Caltrans, and any other stakeholder Agency. Burne Engineering will support and perform a portion the bridge preventive maintenance work tasked herein. The Dokken Team will provide bridge preventive maintenance work, traffic handling, signing/striping and coordination. Plan and specification submittals shall be provided in digital format to the City. Hard copy plan sets may be provided upon request. Digital files shall be in Portable Document Format (PDF) and AutoCAD 2023 format. Technical Specifications will be prepared using the Caltrans Standard Specifications and Standard Special Provisions (latest versions) as a basis, modified for FHWA requirements and submitted along with plans at 60%, 90% and 100%.

A formal Quality Control (QC) review will be performed by Dokken and Burne Engineering at each submittal phase. The review will address construction drawings, technical specifications, cost estimates, and overall constructability of the project.

Traffic, Signing and Striping
Dokken will design permanent striping, pavement markings, and signing plans per the California MUTCD latest edition. Signing and Striping plans will be prepared at each bridge location receiving methacrylate deck treatment to maintain the existing striping configuration. It is assumed that the programmed bridge maintenance work will occur in stages at each bridge to maintain at least one lane of traffic in each direction during construction. Typical Traffic Control Applications from latest CA MUTCD or Caltrans Standard Plans will be utilized for the various closure scenarios anticipated.

Caltrans Encroachment Permits will be obtained for BR# 55C-0055 and 55C-0115, as applicable, where signing and signing or traffic handling encroach into Caltrans Right-of-Way.

Task 2.1 60% Design - Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) Upon approval of 30% PS&E by the City and Caltrans and upon receiving environmental clearance (both NEPA and CEQA), The Dokken team will prepare and submit the draft 60% plans, specifications, and estimate to the City. 60% Plans
Upon approval of the work limits defined in the 30% project phase, work will begin on the 60% plans. The plans will incorporate any comments received from the City from the 30% submittal review and will incorporate all construction details including signing/striping and traffic handling necessary to complete BPMP work. The plans will show utilities based on research and utility mapping. A full set of plans will be prepared with consideration for constructability and public safety.

Although not anticipated, if any ancillary structures design is needed, it shall be in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (Eighth Edition) with California Amendments current at time of bridge design, Caltrans Bridge Design Details Manual, Caltrans Bridge Design Aids, Caltrans Bridge Memos to Designers, Structure Technical Policies, and Bridge Design Memos, Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria (SDC), Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications (latest version), and City CAD Standards. The bridge design work will be performed in English units of measure.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 181 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 7
60% Opinion of Probable Cost
The Dokken Team will provide cost estimates at the 60% PS&E design submittal. Detailed quantities will be prepared in accordance with Caltrans Standard Specifications (latest version) and payment items. The engineer’s estimate of probable construction cost (“Marginal Estimate”) for the project will be prepared using the most recent and relevant Caltrans Cost Data, Consultants cost data, as well as the City’s cost data. 60% Contract Specifications and Special Provisions
The Dokken Team will prepare the contract Technical Provisions for the project based in general on Caltrans Standard Special Provisions (latest version) as a basis and modified for FHWA requirements, Caltrans Standard Specifications (latest version), and City construction contract standards.

Task 2.1 Deliverables: One (1) digital copy of Plans and Specifications; One (1) digital copy of Opinion of Probable Cost; Two (2) Caltrans Encroachment Permit applications; One (1) digital copy of QC comments and comment responses of the submitted PS&E Package.

Task 2.2 90% Design - Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) At the 90% level, a thorough review of the plans, work limits, details and specifications is performed for clarity, capacity, City standards, and constructability issues. When the review is complete, the designers will address all comments from the internal and City reviews of the PS&E package. After plan corrections, the designer will review the corrected details to ensure all comments have been addressed.

The Dokken Team will proceed with the preparation of the 90% submittal. Plan sheets included in the 60% submittal will receive additional annotation, descriptions, and notes identified per the City’s review and the independent check. The submittal will include written responses to all comments received on the prior submittal.

Task 2.2 Deliverables: One (1) digital copy of Plans and Specifications; One (1) digital copy of Opinion of Probable Cost; Two (2) Final Caltrans Encroachment Permit applications; One (1) digital copy of QC comments and comment responses of the submitted PS&E Package.

Task 2.3 100% Design - Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) At the 100% level, the QC focus will be to confirm prior review comments have been adequately addressed and review any new information added since the 90% submittal. A mark-up of the plans, special provisions and item list will be provided to the Project Manager.

After review comments are received from the 90% Bridge PS&E, The Dokken Team will revise the plans and coordinate the necessary changes to the specifications and estimate. Written responses to the City and Caltrans comments will be prepared and provided with the 100% submittal.

Task 2.3 Deliverables: One (1) digital copy of Plan and specifications; one (1) digital set of 100% Bidding Documents; one (1) digital copy of Opinion of Probable Cost; One (1) digital copy of Design Calculations if applicable; One (1) digital copy of QC comments and comment responses of the submitted PS&E Package.

TASK 3 BID ADVERTISEMENT, CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION, RECORD DRAWINGS Task 3.1 Bid Advertisement
Bidding procedures will be the responsibility of the City. While the PS&E construction package is advertising for bids, all questions concerning the intent shall be referred to the City for resolution. In the event that any item requiring interpretation in the drawings or specifications is discovered during the bidding period, said items shall be analyzed by Dokken for decision by the City. Dokken shall provide support to the City during the Bidding phase by assisting with questions, requests for information/clarification, or conflicts arising out of the bidding process. Dokken shall attend pre-bid meeting, if scheduled.

Task 3.2 Construction Administration
Dokken shall provide support to the City during the Construction Administration phase by assisting with questions, requests for information/clarification, and/or reviewing submittals. Consultant shall review and approve all submittals and shop plan drawings required to support the construction contract. Dokken shall complete shop drawings reviews within two (2) weeks of receipt. Contract Change Order reviews shall be completed within two (2) working days of receipt. Dokken shall be available as requested by the City to resolve discrepancies in the contract documents. Dokken shall bring to the attention of the City any defects or deficiencies in the work by the construction contractor which Dokken may observe. Dokken shall have no authority to issue instruction on behalf of the City, or to deputize another to do so.

Task 3.3 Record Drawings/As-Builts
Upon construction completion, the City will submit field-marked prints to Dokken. Dokken shall incorporate all changes to the plans electronically with all necessary revision notations, signature, and submit to the City.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 182 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 8

SCHEDULE
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 183 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 9

AGREEMENT STATEMENT
Dokken Engineering does not take any exceptions to the City’s Professional Services Agreement. Dokken Engineering will comply with the contract terms and conditions delineated in the RFP.

FIRM AND TEAM EXPERIENCE

ABOUT DOKKEN ENGINEERING
Founded in 1986, Dokken Engineering (Dokken) is a multi-discipline, professional services firm specializing in all phases of project development and delivery, including preliminary engineering, environmental documents, feasibility studies, PSRs, PA&EDs, PS&Es, and design support during construction. During the past 39 years, we have developed an exceptional depth of experience and expertise having engineered and obtained environmental compliance on more than 3,000 infrastructure projects, including more than 2,500 federally funded projects.

We employ a diverse group of over 160 civil, structural, traffic, hydraulics/ hydrology, and drainage designers, as well as environmental planners, community outreach experts, funding, and right-of-way specialists, who together provide seamless and cost-effective project delivery. Due to our size, and our in-house services, we can immediately provide a team of professionals to meet your project’s schedule needs.

Dokken Engineering’s performance is measured by our ability to successfully deliver quality infrastructure projects throughout California and serving a variety of public agency clients. The majority of Dokken’s clients are repeat clients! This attests to our abilities and history of providing quality services, meeting schedules, and remaining within budgets. Dokken has a long, distinguished history of delivering award-winning projects that have been completed throughout California. No other firm has a greater record of professional civil engineering project success than Dokken. But don’t take our word for it, call our references.

FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Dokken is a growing, financially responsible firm with the majority of our business coming from repeat clients. Dokken is financially sound and has no long-term debt. We promptly pay our subconsultants and vendors, evidenced by our Class 1 credit ratings with Dun & Bradstreet (DUNS #15-020-9971). For all our years in business, we have maintained insurance coverage that exceeds industry standards through reputable insurance companies with the highest A.M. Best ratings. As a California Corporation for the past 39 years, there are no planned or anticipated changes in our business organization or operations.

Dokken meets all of Caltrans’ A&E Consultant Audit and Review Process requirements and successfully navigates the process with every one of our projects subject to Caltrans oversight. We have our financial statements and overhead rate voluntarily audited annually by an independent CPA to expedite the Caltrans audit process and to ensure that our financials and indirect cost rate comply with all Federal funding rules. Our accounting staff and independent auditors regularly attend Caltrans Audits and Investigations training sessions to ensure that we are up to date with the latest requirements.

FAMILIARITY WITH SERVICES
Dokken has successfully completed hundreds of structure designs, from rural two-lane HBP bridges, to complex multi-level freeway-to-freeway interchanges. Additional structure designs include pedestrian overcrossings, bicycle bridges, viaducts, and retaining/sound walls. Dokken has also provided seismic stability evaluations, retrofit plans, Bridge Preventative HEADQUARTERS:
110 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 200
Folsom, CA 95630
Project Manager:

Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE
1450 Frazee Road, Suite 100
San Diego, CA 92108
Telephone: (858) 514-8377
Mobile: (541) 602-2960
Branch Offices:
1450 Frazee Road, Suite 100
San Diego, CA 92108
101 Pacifica, Suite 350
Irvine, CA 92618
2192 Civic Center Drive
Redding, CA 96001
Organization Form: CA Corporation
Year of Incorporation: 1986
Total No. of Employees: 162
Firm Capabilities & Expertise:
• Project Management
• Structures
• HBP
• Street Improvements
• Roadway/Highway Design
• Stormwater
• Water/Sewer
• Street Lighting
• Signing/Striping
• Erosion Control
• Drainage
• Hydrology/Hydraulics
• Traffic Control Plans
• Grant Writing
• NEPA/CEQA
• Environmental Permits
• Right of Way Acquisition &
Relocation Assistance
www.dokkenengineering.com
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 184 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 10
Maintenance Plans, specifications, and estimates. Our structures team has innovative and cost-effective design solutions which save our clients millions of dollars. Paying careful attention to the details of a project’s setting, along with client and community feedback, our designs meet the unique conditions of each project.

IN-HOUSE EXPERTISE
With numerous technical specialties under one roof, project coordination, and communication are maximized. The following are some of our featured in-house services:

Roadway Design | Roadway design is an
integral component of Dokken’s services. From
freeways to residential streets, our engineers
design both simple and complex roadway widenings,
realignments, street “diets”, and new extensions, as well as the required improvements to the surrounding areas,
such as bikeway and pedestrian facilities, rail trails, landscaping, hardscapes, sidewalks, utility relocations, bus stop/pullouts and intersection signalization.

Structures Design | Dokken has successfully
completed hundreds of structure designs, from
rural two-lane HBP bridges to complex multilevel freeway-to-freeway interchanges. Additional structure designs include pedestrian overcrossings,
bicycle bridges, viaducts, and retaining/sound walls.

Dokken has also provided seismic stability evaluations, retrofit plans, specifications, and estimates. Our
structures team has innovative and cost-effective design solutions, which save our clients millions of dollars. Paying careful attention to the details of a project’s setting, along with client and community feedback, our designs meet
the unique conditions of each project.

Environmental Services | Dokken has an
experienced in-house Environmental Services
Group that works on our roadway, bridge, and
infrastructure projects throughout California. We have
established professional working relationships with
federal and state regulatory agencies based on technical excellence and a thorough understanding of regulatory
processes, including, Environmental Document
Preparation (NEPA / CEQA Analysis and Compliance),
Technical Studies & Reports, and Environmental
Regulatory Permitting & Compliance using a hands-on
approach that has accelerated regulatory schedules.

Right of Way Services | The Dokken team has
considerable experience preparing right of
way engineering documents under State and
Federal law as outlined in the Caltrans Right of Way
Manual. Our services consist of researching public
records, obtaining title reports, preparing appraisal maps, owner exhibits, and plats and legal descriptions for the conveyance of land title rights, such as easements, fee title grant deeds, and temporary construction easements between parties.

TRUSTED SUBCONSULTANTS
Dokken has enlisted the following subconsultants to meet the City’s DBE goal and to provide a full-service team.

Burne Engineering (DBE)
Role: Structural Design
Established in 2007, Burne Engineering Services, Inc.
(Burne Engineering) is a certified DBE structural
engineering firm, specializing in the design and
construction support of transportation-related structures, such as bridges and retaining walls, and buildings. Their licensed professional engineers have been designing
transportation-related structures for more than twentyfive years, having provided construction support for more than a hundred bridges and dozens of retaining walls.

Geocon Consultants, Inc.

Role: Hazardous Materials
Geocon Consultants, Inc. is a California Corporation
established in 1971 as a professional engineering
consulting firm providing comprehensive geotechnical
engineering, environmental consulting, materials testing, and special inspection services for over 54 years.

Employing over 350 technically strong and highly
motivated engineers, geologists, environmental scientists, and technicians. State-of-the-art geotechnical and
materials testing laboratories, extensive inventories of field equipment and instrumentation, comprehensive
technical libraries, and advanced data-management
systems support each office.

Optime Consulting Group
Role: Surveying/Right of Way Engineering
Optime Consulting Group, certified SB/SBE firm, is a
dynamic and innovative force in the construction industry.

They specialize in concrete materials, forensic
assessment, nondestructive testing, pavement design and evaluation, and sustainability, approaching each project with technical precision and a deep sense of
responsibility. Optime Consulting Group offers a wide
range of materials-related services, including material characterization, testing, performance evaluation, failure analysis, and material design and optimization.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 185 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 11

PROJECT TEAM
Leading our team and coordinating our team’s resources is Project Manager, Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE. Gabriel brings over 14 years of experience in providing project specific engineering solutions and managing civil engineering services for public agency infrastructure projects. His time-sensitive approach to managing projects has resulted in expedited project completion, the quick restoration of facility operations, and adherence to project budgets, schedules, and goals.

Gabriel will be directly responsible for project management and the primary contact with the City. The following organizational chart visually represents the structure of our proposed team and the relationship among our Project Manager, subconsultants, and support staff.

The following resumes provides qualification information for our key personnel including their technical expertise and experience directly related to the proposed work.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 186 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 12
Gabriel Hoxmeier, PE

PROJECT MANAGER

EDUCATION
2010, BS Civil Engineering, Oregon State University
2011, M.Eng., Civil Engineering, Oregon State University

LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
2022, California Professional Civil Engineer, #C93700

EXPERIENCE
14 years (2 w/Dokken)

AVAILABILITY
40%
Mr. Gabriel Hoxmeier is a California
registered professional engineer with
14 years of experience whose
primary role is as a bridge engineer
designing transportation related
structures. His expertise includes
designing bridges, retaining walls, overhead
sign structures, and culverts, working with steel,
prestressed concrete, post-tensioned concrete, and
conventionally reinforced concrete. He has strong
fundamentals with a broad design background with
concrete and steel superstructures, substructures, load ratings, seismic designs, and inspections. Mr. Hoxmeier’s project experience includes preliminary concept designs, design-bid-builds, design-build projects, and load ratings and assessments of existing structures.

Alvarado Canyon Road Realignment | San Diego, CA
Bridge Design Engineer | Dokken is providing preliminary engineering and PS&E design for the Alvarado Canyon
Road Realignment & Culvert Replacement Project. The
primary purpose of the project is to alleviate current and projected future traffic congestion on Fairmount Avenue, Mission Gorge Road, Alvarado Canyon Road, and the
westbound I-8 off-ramp at Fairmount Ave, and address
localized flooding issues within the portions of Grantville located north of Alvarado Creek. Developed APS for the
Alvarado Canyon Bridge, as well as a widening of an
existing box culvert investigating constructability,
construction costs, and staged construction.

East Campus Loop Road, UCSD | San Diego, CA
Lead Structures Engineer | UC San Diego is proposing
improvements to its East Campus. One major point of
focus for the renovation of East Campus includes
reconfiguring existing roadways and incorporating new
landscape space to free up additional infill building sites and enhance circulation for all users. Among the project improvements, there are retaining walls to support
streets, parking lots and general grading. Developed
designs, plans and specifications for seven retaining walls of various types including masonry, spread footings, and CIDH foundation walls. Project is on-going through its 95% submittal.

Grandview Beach Access Stairway Structural
Assessment | Encinitas, CA
Bridge Design Engineer | Dokken Engineering conducted
investigations, structural assessment, and repair
estimates for the multi-level timber and concrete beach access stairway located along the Coast Highway.

Structural inspections consisted of field investigations to test, inventory, and photo document maintenance needs
for stairway elements experiencing deterioration from
prolonged marine exposure. Concrete soundings and
timber specimen cores were taken to assess the material conditions. Provided structural evaluation memorandums
detailing the conditions of the main structural concrete and timber elements, and steel connection hardware, and estimated maintenance and repair costs.

Bryan District Bridge Program, TxDOT | Bryan District,
TX
Work Authorization Manager | Oversaw design team,
project budget, schedule, contract development, and
contract supplemental agreements. Program covers
development of PS&E packages for 35 bridges
replacements in the Bryan District over 5 years with a total contract fee of $14M. The program is uniquely designed
to alleviate TxDOT’s resources as 30%, 60% and 90%
submittals are performed by an internal independent
review team instead of TxDOT. Bridges are a mix of OFF
and ON system bridges with construction fundings ranging from $400,000 to $9,000,000. Bridges include slab beams, box beams, and Tx girders. Held Design Concept
Conferences with the client and representatives about the preliminary project concept. Coordinated with subconsultants for survey, utilities, and geotechnical investigations. Lead design team through development of PS&E packages.

Santa Monica Pier Bridge Replacement | Santa Monica,
CA
Bridge Design Engineer| This project will replace the
existing 446-foot Pier Bridge that connects to the timber pier. Gabriel is responsible for design and coordination for the existing bridge demolition plans, steel staircase and pier railing, and temporary vehicle ramps to maintain
access to the pier. The project team completed the 65%
design in April 2024 and the project is on schedule to bid in 2025.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 187 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 13
Charles Tornaci, PE

PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE

EDUCATION
1999, BS Mechanical Engineering, Cal Poly San Luis
Obispo

LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
2023, California Professional Civil Engineer, #C66058

EXPERIENCE
25 years (All w/Dokken)

AVAILABILITY
30%
Mr. Charles Tornaci is Dokken’s San
Diego structures team leader, both
overseeing and performing the
structural analysis and design efforts
for bridge projects in Southern
California. With over 25 years of
experience on structural transportation
projects spanning over Caltrans, Railroad, and Army Corp facilities, he is very familiar with Caltrans Local Assistance and Division of Structures standards and practices,
specializing in innovative and cost-effective design
solutions. He has been involved in a wide range of
projects involving planning, design, construction, seismic retrofits of vehicular and pedestrian bridges, retaining walls, bike trails, and bridge preventive maintenance.
2016-2017 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program |
Carlsbad, CA
Project Manager | Responsible for the site investigations and documentation memorandum detailing structural
defects in the existing structures and recommendations
for preventative maintenance to extend the serviceable
life for 10 local agency bridges within the City of Carlsbad.

Worked directly with City staff to update maintenance
priority and led the project team to advance the PS&E for bridge preventative maintenance repairs for two
structures. Calle Barcelona POC details involved repairs to spalled rock façades, crack sealing, and righting of a tilting monument wall. Poinsettia Lane OH work involved
replacing bridge railing and repairing approach railing damaged by exposure to marine environment, adding
expansion joints, and concrete crack repair. Details and materials specified to address coastal environment
conditions. Railroad specific project specifications were included with the contract documents to detail required right of entry agreements and trainings required to
perform maintenance work over and adjacent to UPRR
facilities.
2018-2019 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program |
Carlsbad, CA
Project Manager | Responsible for advancing the PS&E for bridge preventative maintenance repairs for two
structures. Jefferson Street Bridge involved providing a methacrylate overlay to seal existing deck cracks,
replacement and repairs to existing bridge railings and metal beam guard railing approach systems, as well as
sidewalk remediation to meet ADA standards. El Camino
Real Bridge at San Marcos Creek involved methacrylate
overlay in multiple stages with traffic handling plans
reviewed and approved by Caltrans to receive the
Encroachment Permit to perform the work. Pressure
grouting of deteriorated slopes below sidewalk curb
ramps was performed to mitigate future costly repairs.

Maria Ygnacia Creek Bridge | San Barbara County, CA
Project Manager | Responsible for the seismic retrofit of an existing 3-span 132-foot-long composite steel girder bridge on San Marcos Road over Maria Ygnacia Creek.

Retrofit consisted of replacing existing steel pier column cross bracing, adding additional base plates and anchor bolts at existing pier columns, and cast-in-drilled-hole piling behind the abutments to restrain longitudinal
seismic movements. Design challenges included detailing around and accommodating several existing underground
and overhead utilities within the construction limits.

City of Palm Desert Bridge Preventive Maintenance |
Palm Desert, CA
Project Manager | Responsible for preparing the City’s
Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program and
Prioritization List, including a report documenting the City’s bridge inventory and maintenance needs, scoring
criteria, construction cost estimates, and condition photo documentation of bridges within the City. Worked
directly with City staff to organize a multi-year phasing strategy for the maintenance work to meet the
prioritization in conjunction with City fiscal year budget allocations, and led the project team to complete PS&E for bridge preventive maintenance of five structures. Repair details involved joint seal replacements and expansion
dams, corrugated steel arch culvert repair and
replacement splicing, and concrete spall repairs on
existing superstructures and substructures.

Additional Relevant Experience:
• Grandview and Swami’s Beach Stairway Structural
Assessment, Encinitas, CA
• Sycamore Avenue Beach Access Stairways
Emergency Repair, Carlsbad, CA
• Emergency Slope Repair, Del Mar, CA
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 188 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 14
Steve Kooyman, PE

QA/QC REVIEW

EDUCATION
1991, BS Civil Engineering, CSU Chico

LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
1996, California Professional Civil Engineer, #C55757
QSD/QSP Training
Pavement Inspector Certification

EXPERIENCE
32 years (<1 w/Dokken)

AVAILABILITY
40%
Mr. Steve Kooyman is a Registered Civil
Engineer with 32 years of experience,
primarily serving jurisdictions in
Northern and Southern California. His
roles have included Project Manager,
Construction Manager, Supervising Civil
Design Engineer, and Quality Control
Engineer. He has helped numerous cities deliver public
works Capital Improvement Program projects across
various phases, including planning, environmental, right of way, design, bid, and construction. His expertise spans water, sewer, storm drain, streets, PCC ADA, sidewalk,
facilities, parks, bike trails, erosion control, and stream restoration projects. Steve also has extensive experience in development projects and Caltrans/City Cooperative
Agreement coordination. His deep knowledge of
engineering policies, codes, and standards makes him a
valuable resource for engineers, architects, contractors, and public agencies.

SR 57 & Lambert Road Interchange Improvements |
Brea, CA
Project Manager | Project Manager for this $98 M
Interchange Improvement project in coordination with City of Brea and Caltrans District 12 via cooperative agreement.

He managed the extensive public and stakeholder
outreach, Agency coordination, right-of-way acquisition, CEQA/NEPA development and processing, mitigation
measures, schedule, budget with various State/Fed grant and local funding, PAED, PS&E, and Construction. The
project took over 10 years to complete from preliminary engineering, right-of-way, environmental/permits, PS&E to final construction with landscape phase into the two-year plant establishment stage.

Arovista Park Modernization Project | Brea, CA
Project Manager | Steve assisted the City with managing this high priority park project for Brea from preliminary engineering into bid and award, with assistance into
construction. The project design included new accessible playground equipment and surfacing, mass grading,
retaining and sound walls, PCC walkways and curbs, new
restroom, new drainage treatment facilities, new ball fields and amenities, amphitheater, all new utilities, ADA ramps, new lighting, EV charging stations, and miscellaneous park improvements within the Phase 1, 5-acre area.

Traffic Signal Modification Improvements | Brea, CA
Project Manager | Steve managed this signal modification project which replaced several signals at three
intersections in Brea.

Brea Boulevard Street Improvements | Brea, CA
Project Manager | Steve managed this pavement
rehabilitation project which included milling 2” deep
30,000 sf of pavement, placement of 250,000 SF Type II
Slurry, removing and replacement of 12 ADA ramps, and
other AC and PCC street improvements along Brea Blvd
from Imperial Highway to Fir Street in Brea.

South Brea Water, Sewer and Street Improvements |
Brea, CA
Project Manager | Steve managed this extensive
rehabilitation project which replaced 14,850 LF 8” C-900 water mains and appurtenances, 300 1”-2” copper water
services, 32 FH’s, 1,794 LF of 6-8” VCP sewer mains, 28 ADA ramps and misc. curb and gutter work, 2,800 SF of AC R&R, 174,00 SF AC grinding, 1,850 TN’s ARHM overlay, and
384,000 SF Type II slurry with, traffic control, and erosion control measures within various streets in the South Brea subdivision area.

Trabuco Road and Lake Forest Boulevard Pavement
Rehabilitation | Lake Forest, CA
Project Manager | Steve managed the construction
management and inspection team through construction in
coordination with the City for this combined three CIP
Project contract with All American Asphalt, contractor for the City.

Bear Street Pavement Rehabilitation | Costa Mesa, CA
Project Manager | Steve completed the pavement design
and managed the project in coordination with the City up through bid & award and pre-construction for this ½ mile AC grind and cap project, inclusive of ADA ramps and misc.

PCC sidewalk and curb and gutter replacement.

Additional Relevant Experience:
• Costa Mesa Storm Water Master Plan, Costa Mesa, CA
• Briarwood Sewer List Station, Brea, CA
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 189 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 15
Gabriela Morales, PE

STRUCTURES PROJECT ENGINEER

EDUCATION
2021, MS Civil Engineering, UC Davis
2017, BS Structural Engineering, UC San Diego

LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
2022, California Professional Civil Engineer, #C93473

EXPERIENCE
8 years (All w/Dokken)

AVAILABILITY
50%
Ms. Gabriela Morales is a California
registered Engineer with 8 years of
experience in designing and analyzing
bridges and other transportationrelated structures. She serves as an associate engineer for Dokken’s bridge
and structure design team. She has
designed structures ranging from multi-span precast and cast-in-place bridges to multi-level anchored soldier pile walls.

National Trails Highway 10 HBP Bridges | San
Bernardino County, CA
Structures Project Engineer | National Trails
Highway/Route 66 is a historic route that was developed through the Mojave Desert region of San Bernardino
County. These bridges allow stormwater to flow under the highway but are all at the end of their useful life. The replacement bridges will be reinforced concrete slabs,
varying from 43-foot single-span to 90-foot three-span
bridges. Gabriela is responsible for overseeing the design team, coordinating with the subconsultants, and ensuring on-time delivery of the PS&E for all project milestones.

Tulare County Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program
(Group 5) | Tulare County, CA
Structures Project Engineer | This project intends to
extend the service life of 24 bridges within Tulare County by implementing preventive maintenance measures
primarily consisting of scour protection repairs and other work including deck treatment, spall repair, structural connection repairs, join repairs, bridge bearing repairs, and asphalt concrete removal. Gabriela is responsible for overseeing the design team, coordinating with the
subconsultants, and ensuring on-time delivery of the PS&E for all project milestones.

Santa Monica Pier Bridge Replacement | Santa Monica,
CA
Structures Design Engineer | This project will replace the existing Pier Bridge with a 7 span, 446-foot long, and 39- foot-wide bridge. In addition to the bridge replacement, the project contains 11 additional structure tasks.

Gabriela is responsible for the bridge design, project
coordination, and QA/QC of all structure deliverables. The project team completed the 65% design in April 2024 and the project is on schedule to bid in 2025.

Fern Road East at Glendenning Creek Bridge
Replacement | Shasta County, CA
Structures Project Engineer | This project will replace the existing timber bridge with a single-span, 95-foot long, and 28-foot-wide bridge. Gabriela is responsible for the bridge design of the cast-in-place post-tensioned bridge, project coordination, and delivery of the PS&E for all
project milestones. The project team completed the 35%
design in March 2024.

Eastside Road and Sharon Ave. HBP Bridges | Redding,
CA
Structures Design Engineer | The Eastside Road Bridge
crosses Olney Creek and Sharon Avenue Bridge crosses
the ACID irrigation canal. Sharon Avenue was replaced
with a single-span, 55-foot long, and 28-foot and 11-inch wide, cast-in-place/post-tensioned slab bridge. Eastside Road will be replaced with a three-span, 86-foot long, and 52-foot wide, cast-in-place/post-tensioned slab bridge.

Gabriela was responsible for the design calculations,
development of the plans and cost estimate, and ongoing construction support, including RFI responses and
submittal review.

SR-01 over Jack Peters Creek Bridge Widening |
Mendocino County, CA
Structures Design Engineer | This project is part of
Dokken’s structures on-call contract in Caltrans District 1.

The project will widen the existing three-span 223-foot long continuous bridge over Jack Peters Creek. The bridge will feature two 12-foot lanes and a 6-foot separated
pedestrian walkway. Gabriela successfully wrote the
project’s Type Selection Report. The report was approved by Caltrans and Gabriela completed the design phase of
the project, including all coordination with Caltrans
functional units. The project has bid in August 2023 and is currently under construction.

Additional Relevant Experience
• Capital Southeast Connector: White Rock Road, El
Dorado & Sacramento Counties, CA
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 190 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 16
Megan Cunningham, PE

ROADWAY DESIGN

EDUCATION
2016, BS Civil Engineering, Gonzaga University

LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
2023, California Professional Civil Engineer, #C94909

EXPERIENCE
9 years (All w/Dokken)

AVAILABILITY
40%
Ms. Megan Cunningham is an Associate
Engineer with experience in roadway
design, stage construction and traffic
handling design, curb ramp design,
culvert design, bike path design, and
grant-writing. Ms. Cunningham is
proficient in both MicroStation V8i and
AutoCAD Civil 3D design software.

Palm Avenue/I-805 Interchange | San Diego, CA
Design Engineer | Responsible for designing stage
construction and traffic handling plans and assisting with preparing roadway PS&E for Palm Avenue Interchange.

Dokken is providing PS&E design for the modifications to improve traffic operations and alleviate future traffic congestion at the I-805/Palm Avenue interchange. Dokken Engineering also served as Lead Author and Design
Engineer for the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law's Fiscal Year 2022 Bridge Investment Program (BIP) Grant. Dokken, the City of San Diego, and Caltrans District 11 worked together and was 1 of only 9 projects to receive this grant funding as well as the only project in the state of California! As a result, the City of San Diego received $24 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA).

Green Tree Boulevard Extension Project | Victorville, CA Design Engineer | Responsible for stage
construction/traffic handling plans, water line design, assisting with preparing roadway PS&E, and providing
design support during construction for Green Tree
Boulevard project. Project improvements include
constructing a new east-west arterial connecting Yates
Road/Yucca Loma Road to Hesperia Road including a new
overhead structure across the BNSF railroad.

I-8 Stage Construction | San Diego County, CA
Design Engineer | Responsible for design support of stage construction plans during construction. The Project
rehabilitated approximately 10 miles of distressed
pavement along eastbound Interstate 8. Stage
construction plans were developed by Caltrans, but the
contractor presented a proposal to revise the stage
construction concept. Dokken worked with Caltrans to
design and implement updated stage construction plans
that met Caltrans standards, but improved construction
efficiencies, reduced impact to the traveling public, and shortened the overall construction duration.

I-805 South Asset Management Project – Bike Path |
San Diego, CA
Design Engineer | Responsible for preliminary design and Project Report support for a multi-use facility proposed as part of the Asset Management project. Currently, bicycle access is permitted on the northbound and southbound
shoulder of I-805 between Palm Avenue and Main Street.

The project proposes to add a separated multi-use facility to provide a more inviting and comfortable path. Dokken led the preliminary design and supported Caltrans in the creating the Project Report.

Coastal Rail Trail from Oceanside Boulevard to Morse
Street | Oceanside, CA
Design Engineer| Responsible for developing the final
Project Study Report and preparing the Active
Transportation Program (ATP) Grant Application. Dokken
Engineering worked with the City of Oceanside to develop, analyze and present alternatives for the Coastal Rail Trail connecting Morse Street and Oceanside Boulevard. The
Coastal Rail Trail is a planned continuous bicycle route that, once complete, will provide a dedicated bike facility for 44 miles between the City of Oceanside and Downtown San
Diego. The project is needed to improve bicycle and
pedestrian mobility through the corridor.

Green Infrastructure Group 1014 │ San Diego, CA
Design Engineer │ Responsible for curb ramp and cross
gutter design, and preparing roadway PS&E. The project
added cross gutters and curb ramps at the intersections of Chamoune Avenue/Polk Avenue and 46th Street/Polk
Avenue. The project also includes environmental technical studies for the project and providing Green Infrastructure to an underserviced area of the City, as part of the Green Infrastructure Group 1014. Project improvements consist of construction of storm drain inlets and pipes, storm drain cleanouts, new curb ramps, curbs and gutters, cross
gutters, roadway reconstruction, striping and pavement
markings. In addition, the green infrastructure will also incorporate inlet biofiltration devices, Oldcastle
StormCapture modules (or approved equivalent), and
Modular Wetland System Best Management Practices (or
approved equivalent).

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 191 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 17
Jeffrey Little

ENVIRONMENTAL

EDUCATION
1990, AA Business, Sacramento City College

EXPERIENCE
30 years (<1 w/ Dokken)

AVAILABILITY
40%
Mr. Jeffery Little (Jeff) is a Senior
Environmental Planner with 30 years
of experience on transportation
projects in Caltrans Districts 1, 2, 3, 4,
5, and 10 for Caltrans Local Assistance
oversight and Capital projects. He
manages multi-disciplinary teams to
satisfy complex regulatory requirements and complete
CEQA/NEPA processes. He prepares preliminary
environmental studies, oversees technical documents,
conducts endangered species consultations, writes
environmental documents, and prepares permit
applications. Jeff works with public agency staff to identify design and construction solutions that minimize or avoid impacts whenever possible.

Stevenson Road Bridge Rehabilitation | Solano County,
CA
Environmental Lead | Solano County selected Dokken
Engineering to assist with permitting and construction
monitoring for the rehabilitation of the historic bridge over Putah Creek on Stevenson Bridge Road. The bridge is locally known as “Graffiti Bridge.” Jeff is supporting the County with obtaining a Central Valley Flood Protection Board Encroachment Permit with a Corps’ Section 408
approval. Other resource agency permits include a Corps’ Nationwide Permit, Regional Board Water Quality
Certification, and a CDFW Streambed Alteration
Agreement. He managed the preparation of a
Supplemental Biological Assessment for NEPA
revalidation. Construction support services include the transplantation of elderberry shrubs, preconstruction
surveys, and implementation of permit requirements.

Construction is scheduled for 2026.

Coastal Rail Trail from Oceanside Boulevard to Morse
Street | Oceanside, CA
Senior Environmental Planner | The City of Oceanside
intends to close a gap in the Coastal Rail Trail by
constructing a bridge over Loma Alta Creek adjacent to
Buccaneer Park. Funding for a new bridge was secured
and the environmental process commenced. Jeff is
preparing regulatory permits including a CCC CDP for the new bridge.

Baker Boulevard Bridge over Mojave River Channel
Replacement | San Bernardino, CA
Senior Environmental Planner | San Bernardino intends
to replace the wood trestle bridge in the community of
Baker. Funding for a new bridge was secured and the
environmental process commenced. Jeff prepared the
Visual Impact Assessment and Water Quality Assessment
Report for the project.

Kings County Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
| Kings County, CA
Senior Environmental Planner | Kings County intends
repair 15 bridges in their Project List No.2 group. The project entails environmental compliance, PS&E, and
ROW. Jeff is managing the environmental process for the 15 bridges.

Big Chico Creek Storm Damage Repair – Two Sites |
Chico, CA
Senior Environmental Planner | The City of Chico intends to repair two storm damaged bridges on Big Chico Creek.

The work is partially funded through FEMA. Formal
Section 7 consultations are needed with USFWS and
NOAA Fisheries. Jeff is preparing regulatory permits for the repair work.

Laguna Creek Trail Overcrossing New Bridge | Elk Grove, CA
Senior Environmental Planner | The City of Elk Grove
intends to close a gap in the Laguna Creek Trail system by constructing a new bridge over Highway 99 and a trail
extension. Funding for a new bridge was secured and the environmental process commenced. Jeff prepared the
Community Impact Assessment for the project.

Additional Relevant Experience
• City of Roseville 16 Bridge BPMP, Placer County, CA
• Trinity County HSIP Cycle 8 Guardrails, Trinity County, CA
• Mariposa County 25 Bridge BPMP, Mariposa County,
CA
• Placer County HSIP Cycle 7 19 Intersections, Placer
County, CA
• City of Stockton 6 Bridge BPMP, San Joaquin County,
CA
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 192 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 18
Lori Burne, PE, SE

STRUCTURE DESIGN

EDUCATION
1999, Master of Science, UC Davis
1993, BS Civil Engineering, UC Davis

LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
1998, California Professional Civil Engineer, #C58412
2013, California Professional Structural Engineer, #S6053

EXPERIENCE
25 years

AVAILABILITY
20%
Ms. Lori Burne, a licensed Structural
Engineer, has over 25 years of
experience in the structural design,
rehabilitation, retrofit, inspection,
and construction of highway bridges
and buildings. She is familiar with
Caltrans’ current design standards and
detailing formats as well as Caltrans’ procedures for local assistance projects. She has field construction experience in both highway bridges and building structures having
provided construction support and inspection services.

Transportation work includes the structural design and
independent check of bridge, culvert, and retaining wall structures, seismic analysis, project specifications,
condition assessment of existing bridges and buildings, construction inspection, advance planning studies, and
software development for bridge and culvert structures.

As Principal-in-Charge, Lori Burne provides company-wide structural engineering design oversight and guidance of the engineering professionals in Burne Engineering. Lori performs a QA/QC review of all major submittals for Burne Engineering projects.

Bridge Preventative Maintenance Repairs | Calaveras
County, CA
Project Manager | Burne Engineering was responsible for the structure portion of the PS&E for the maintenance
repairs of nine county-maintained bridge structures. The scope of the work included polyester concrete overlays, joint seal replacements, bearing replacements,
clean/paint structural steel, remove/replace unsound
concrete, and clean/paint bridge railings.

Bluff Creek Retaining Wall | Humbolt County, CA
QA/QC Manager | Responsible for Quality Control for this retaining wall project for Caltrans District 59, Soldier Pile Ground Anchor wall approximately 173 feet long and
approximately 50 feet tall (maximum exposed height).

Provided Quality Control Plan and QC of PS&E. All project Deliverables were reviewed for completeness,
coordination with other disciplines, and incorporation of written comments made during internal and external
technical and constructability reviews.

Santa Monica Pier Widening and Modification | Santa
Monica, CA
Project Manager | Responsible for the design of an
addition and modifications to the existing timber pier to accommodate the new Colorado Avenue Bridge width.

The existing pier was required to be strengthened in areas to support vehicle live loads. A new steel railing was also added to the timber pier.

Sacramento Viaducts Deck Rehabilitation Design-Build
“Fix50” |Sacramento, CA
Design Quality Validation Manager | Ms. Burne served as Design Quality Validation Manager for this awardwinning, major interchange design-build project for Caltrans District 3. The project included multi-polymer and polyester concrete overlays on portions of the US-50 and I-5 mainline, ramps and connectors as well as joint replacement and deck drainage system improvements.

I-10/605 Interchange Improvements Design-Build |
Baldwin Park, CA
Design Quality Assurance Manager | Ms. Burne served as
Design Quality Assurance Manager for this major
interchange design-build project for Caltrans District 7.

The project will replace the existing at-grade southbound connector with a one-lane flyover direct connector,
realign portions of the interchange connectors, and
modify portions of Dalewood Street in the City of Baldwin Park.

Amador Creek Bridge/Historic Building | Amador City,
CA
Project Engineer | Provided the structural design of the relocation and strengthening of the existing Historic
Firehouse Building. Conducted field reviews, condition
assessment, and provided construction support and
inspection services. This project was funded by HBP.

Curry Creek Bridge │ Sutter County, CA
Project Engineer │ Served as Project Engineer for the
delivery of the PS&E package covering the design and
construction of a two-span reinforced concrete slab
bridge and 1000 feet of roadway on Pleasant Grove Road
over Curry Creek as part of the replacement of the existing bridge. Also provided construction support and
inspection services for the County during construction.

This project was funded by HBP.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 193 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 19
Rebecca Silva

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

EDUCATION
1992, BS Soil and Water Science, UC Davis

LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
OSHA: 40-Hour HAZWOPER
OSHA: 8-Hour Refresher Training
OSHA: 8-Hour Supervisor Training

EXPERIENCE
33 years

AVAILABILITY
40%
Ms. Rebecca Silva has over 33 years of
experience with Geocon performing
project coordination and
management of soil and groundwater
investigations. Ms. Silva prepares
project documents from proposals and
work plans to reports, documenting findings
and presenting conclusions and recommendations. Ms.

Silva efficiently manages quarterly groundwater
monitoring at numerous sites. Throughout Ms. Silva's
career, she has developed strong working relationships
with clients and regulators to provide cost‐effective
services.

Twin Cities Road Bridge over Snodgrass Slough |
Sacramento County, CA
Senior Scientist/Project Manager | Geocon performed
environmental soil sampling services for the proposed
bridge replacement/modification of the Twin Cities Road Bridge at Snodgrass Slough located in southern
Sacramento County. The County of Sacramento is
proposing to replace or modify the existing bridge along Twin Cities Road. The purpose of this sampling activity was to evaluate whether impacts due to heavy metals
(including aerially deposited lead [ADL] from motor
vehicle exhaust) and petroleum hydrocarbons, pesticides, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) associated with a
former railroad alignment exist in the surface and near surface soils within the bridge approach areas. Ms. Silva was the senior scientist/project manager and conducted
report preparation and laboratory assignments.

Marsh Street Bridge over San Luis Obispo Creek Bridge
Rehabilitation/Replacement | San Luis Obispo, CA
Senior Scientist | Ms. Silva served as senior scientist for an Initial Site Assessment (ISA) for the replacement of the Marsh Street Bridge over San Luis Obispo Creek in
Downtown San Luis Obispo, California. The existing singlespan reinforced concrete T-beam 15 girder structure was determined to be structurally deficient and would be
replaced with a single-span, post-tensioned slab bridge supported on two end abutments. Along with the Marsh
Street Bridge, our ISA also included the Marsh Street
roadway, a bank parking lot, a park, and a few commercial buildings. Existing utilities (water, sewer, electric, gas, etc.) are carried by, passing under, or alongside the
existing bridge. The ISA was performed to evaluate the
potential presence of contamination and hazardous waste facilities within and adjacent to Marsh Street Bridge that may impact the construction of the proposed bridge
replacement. Ms. Silva performed report review and
general consultation.

Santa Fe Avenue Bridge over Tuolumne River Bridge
Replacement | Stanislaus County, CA
Senior Scientist/Project Manager | Ms. Silva served as
senior scientist/project manager for an ISA for the
proposed replacement of the existing Santa Fe Avenue
Bridge over the Tuolumne River, east of State Route 99 and the City of Modesto. The bridge was determined to be
seismically deficient as well as functionally obsolete due to its non-standard width and non-crash-rated railing. The County proposed to either seismically retrofit and widen the bridge or replace it. The ISA was performed to evaluate the potential presence of contamination and hazardous
waste facilities within and adjacent to the project site that may impact right-of-way and temporary construction
easement acquisition and construction of the proposed
roadway and bridge improvements. A preliminary site
investigation was recommended prior to final design and construction. The County later decided to replace the
bridge. Ms. Silva conducted laboratory assignments and
report preparation.

Caltrans Bridges and Structures, Asbestos, Lead, PCB,
and Sandblast Surveys | North & Central Regions, CA
Senior Scientist | Ms. Silva provides technical and field service management for various structure surveys
throughout Northern California. Geocon has completed
hundreds of asbestos and lead-containing paint (LCP)
surveys for Caltrans. Existing Caltrans structures surveyed include bridges, maintenance stations, salt and sand
storage facilities, rest stops, weigh stations, retaining walls and pump houses, and commercial and residential
properties planned for right-of-way acquisition. The
residential and commercial properties have included
single- and multi-family developments, and auto repair, office, and hotel facilities. Related efforts included soil evaluations for deteriorated LCP and sandblast residue
beneath and near bridges.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 194 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 20
Kamran Amini, PhD, PE

CONCRETE TESTING

EDUCATION
2018, PhD Civil Engineering, Iowa State University
2015, MS Civil Engineering, Cleveland State University
Ongoing, MBA, University of Illinois

LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
2023, California Professional Civil Engineer, #C95725
PCI Quality control Personnel – Level 1

EXPERIENCE
15 years

AVAILABILITY
100%
Dr. Kamran Amini is a seasoned
construction materials and structural
engineer with more than 15 years of
experience. He is an expert in design,
production, and evaluation of special
concretes and utilization of several nondestructive test methods. He is vastly experienced in engineering design from the initial
conceptual stage, through feasibility study and to detailed design. He is knowledgeable of standards and test
methods related to construction materials, nondestructive testing, and condition assessment. In addition, Dr. Amini is knowledgeable of the following standards:

ASTM, AASHTO, RILEM, FIB 34. He is also knowledgeable
of MATLAB, JMP, and Design Expert (Statistical Design and Analysis of Data).

Various Projects | Los Angeles, CA
Principal & Senior Consultant | Dr. Amini performs
project document and specification review; material
development and optimization; concrete mixture design
development and optimization; and thermal control plan
development using two-dimensional finite difference
method, service life analysis, Nondestructive testing
(NDT), and pavement engineering. Notable projects may
include NDT evaluation of bridge soffit at Barstow 1st Ave Bridge built by the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA), in cooperation with the City of Barstow and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad, and
service life analysis of drilled Pier- Plug Concrete for San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E).

Quality Assurance and Source Inspection Services
(Contract 59A1336), Caltrans | Northern California, CA
Subject Matter Expert/Staff Engineer/Materials
Engineer | Dr. Amini brings extensive materials
engineering and technical expertise to the evaluation of material specifications, providing insights and guidance in addressing project-specific challenges. He actively
mentors junior staff and METS (Materials Engineering and Testing Services) representatives, assisting them in
identifying solutions to complex issues as they arise.

Professional and Technical Specialist Engineering
Services (Contract 59A1338), Caltrans | Statewide, CA
Subject Matter Expert/Staff Engineer/Materials
Engineer | Dr. Amini provides materials engineering and technical expertise for the evaluation of material
specifications, the investigation of innovative materials and test method standards, and the development and
delivery of materials related training. He works with
various groups within METS and advises and proposes
criteria for the adoption of national test method
standards and generates draft specifications and material recommendation reports. Dr. Amini provides technical
support for the effective implementation of sustainability and performance-based specification in advance of
Pavement and Materials Partnering Committee (PMPC)
efforts.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 195 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 21

PROPOSED WORK PLAN

PROJECT APPROACH
The City of Santa Ana (City) is seeking Professional Engineering Design Services for eight (8) bridges throughout the City. The Caltrans Local Assistance Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) established under the Highway Bridge Program (HBP) serves to extend the life of local agency bridges and delay the need for full rehabilitation or replacement by performing certain qualifying preventative maintenance work.

The City has selected eight bridges to develop Plans, Specifications & Estimate (PS&E) based on recommendations provided through regular Caltrans Bridge Inspections (BIRIS). The City has provided a 2020 BPMP Work Plan to include anticipated bridge work. The work identified is limited to the bridge deck surface including work such as application of methacrylate, cleaning and replacing expansion joints, chaining of the deck and coring and testing the deck for chloride content.

The most current inspection reports indicate additional work recommendations that aren’t reflected in the 2020 BPMP Work Plan. To conform to current standards and inspection criteria, these recommendations will be included in the proposed work activities. These additional work recommendations include repairing substructure concrete spalls, painting of steel components and repaving approaches. Dokken Engineering will perform site assessments along with researching project asbuilts and inspection reports to verify the listed work activities The project is federally funded by the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) through the Highway Bridge Program (HBP) and administered by Caltrans Local Assistance. Funding
authorization has been obtained for Preliminary Engineering (PE) phase. As such, the project must meet the guidelines and requirements of the HBP.

We will review and verify the applicability of the maintenance activities listed on the provided 2020 BPMP Work Plan and most recent inspection Reports. We will perform a field review and identify all other maintenance work to conform with Caltrans inspection criteria. Any additional work identified will be categorized whether it qualifies or not to be included in the BPMP.

If the City wishes to pursue adding these additional recommendations to the scope, we have extensive and recent experience supporting agencies in submitting the Local Assistance Program Guidelines (LAPG) Forms 6A and 6D to request the anticipated funding to accommodate the additional work. It is anticipated that these forms will need to be submitted regardless, due to the escalated design and construction costs exceeding the currently programed values.

The Dokken Team has reviewed the documents provided in the RFP, requested scope of work, and bridge inspection reports gain a full understanding of the project and identify key constraints of the design. The following table summarizes the key project issues and describes the benefit the Dokken Team will bring to the City, which is further discussed on the following pages.

ISSUE SOLUTION BENEFIT
Structures
Most recent BIRIS provides
recommendations not
currently scoped into City’s
BPMP that are eligible for
Federal reimbursement
The Dokken team proposes to perform a
photo documented assessment of each of the
City’s identified bridge sites during the
Preliminary Design task to evaluate existing
conditions and inform the City on whether
the additional and previous recommendations
such as methacrylate overlays and concrete
bridge deck coring are warranted. Additional
HBP eligible work items can be programmed
through Local Assistance Program Guidelines
(LAPG) forms 6A (scope definition) and 6D
(scope/cost/schedule change) to receive
Federal Reimbursement.

The Dokken team has extensive
experience with Bridge Preventive
Maintenance work and is prepared to
incorporate any additional work items
that may be warranted. Dokken
Engineering is well versed in getting
additional scope of work items
programmed for Federal funding, and
has experience preparing LAPG forms 6A
and 6D for our local agency clients to
submit to Caltrans Local Assistance.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 196 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 22

ISSUE SOLUTION BENEFIT
Traffic control during special
site investigations
Dokken Engineering will coordinate
permitting and have traffic control for bridge
deck evaluation and testing. The Dokken
team will keep traffic disturbances to a
minimum and coordinate frequently with all
stakeholders to maintain schedule.

The Dokken team has experience
engaging stakeholders regarding
temporary traffic impacts as well as
preparing appropriate encroachment and
regulatory permit applications and traffic
handling procedures during the design
phase to facilitate safe site
investigations.

State and Federal Procedures
Knowledge of the Federal
Aid process.

Following State and Federal guidelines is key
to receive funding through the available
State and Federal programs. The
development of PS&E must follow standard
Caltrans, HBP and FHWA requirements,
which include obtaining E-76 approvals, and
compliance with NEPA and full compliance
with Chapter 11 of the Local Assistance
Program Guidelines.

Dokken Engineering works exclusively on
transportation projects that require
compliance with State and Federal
regulations. We have a proven track
record of project delivery over 3000
projects and are familiar with every step
of the Federal process and the approval
requirements.

Utility Mapping and Coordination
Construction can be delayed
due to lack of utility
coordination and conflict
identification.

Utility base mapping and coordination
efforts will be prioritized from the beginning
of project design by following a utility
coordination process (Letter #1 and #3).

Located utilities will be identified on the
project plans and noted in the project
specifications to ensure the construction
contractor is aware of existing facilities and
clearances.

While utility conflicts are not anticipated
for the programmed BPMP work,
providing utility base maps and clear
communication to utility companies will
ensure appropriate measures are taken
to protect their facilities in place without
causing delays to construction.

Stage Construction
Construction will require
staged traffic lane closures
impacting public travel.

Closure impacts will vary by
bridge depending on
anticipated construction
activities, different number
of lanes, volume, and
proximities to intersections.

When possible, construction activities
covering the entire bridge deck (such as
methacrylate overlays) will be staged to
always maintain two-way vehicular and
bicycle/pedestrian traffic along the bridges.

If needed, Dokken will work with the City to
identify closures and/or flagging on a bridgeby-bridge basis to best accommodate motorists during. Traffic handling plans will
accommodate driveway and intersection
access for nearby residential and business
properties to maintain access.

Providing continued access during
construction will benefit motorists since
no detours will be required. Maintaining
access to driveways for businesses
reduces economic impacts related to
traffic delays. Dokken has extensive
experience evaluating different closure
alternatives to minimize impacts.

Considerations will be taken for road
classifications, medians, construction
staging, adjoining intersections and
traffic signals.

Environmental
Compliance with NEPA and
CEQA required to utilize
federal funding.

Identify work limits and environmental
impacts early. Organized tracking of both
project wide and bridge specific permits.

Dokken has long history of working
closely with cities and design teams for
early identification of environmental
impacts and obtaining environmental
clearances without project delays.

STRUCTURES
The successful approach to this project will be to provide plans that define the overall work and at the same time, highlight the unique details of each site clearly. The plans will also allow the contractor to streamline their means and methods of construction. We anticipate providing individual General Plan sheets defining all work to be performed, coupled with focused details where applicable, particularly for joint seal replacements, spall repair work and work on bridge railings and substructural components. We will clearly identify all information regarding the above-grade, at-grade and below-grade modifications, all exposed and underground utilities, manholes, gate valve boxes and survey monuments.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 197 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 23
We are very familiar with appropriate joint seal
cleaning procedures and repair materials. In addition,
we have developed relationships with industry
representatives that will assist with unusual
conditions such as coring and testing bridge decks.

Construction cost estimating for these types of
projects can be particularly difficult due to the small scale of required work. Our depth of experience on
bridge preventive maintenance projects will assist
the City with accurately estimating and budgeting
costs for these projects.

The BPMP work plan has identified two bridges to perform deck coring to test for chloride content. Coring and destructive testing should be limited only for bridges that would benefit and alter their maintenance activities based on the results. The bridge decks will be assessed to verify whether it is warranted to determine a proper rehabilitation plan. Coring decks in good condition preemptively would be an unnecessary cost, as well as result in unnecessary patches and traffic impacts. Deck cores would be tested (per ASTM C1152) for chloride concentrations at different depths within the concrete. If the chloride concentration exceeds the threshold at the depth of the reinforcement, sealing the deck won’t prevent future corrosion and a more extensive deck rehabilitation may be needed.

STAGE CONSTRUCTION
Due to large traffic volumes, providing access during construction is of high importance providing safe work zones to protect construction crews and maintaining vehicular traffic and driveway access to nearby businesses must be planned to minimize disruptions. and will be maintained where feasible. The bridges include a variety of multi-lane roadways, ranging from two lanes to seven lanes. For the eight locations identified, the existing bridge width varies from 51-feet to 102-feet, including sidewalks. Bridges immediately adjacent to intersections will require unique construction/temporary signing and
signaling. Signs will be placed ahead of the work to alert motorists per the most recent version of the California MUTCD. Full closure alternatives may be evaluated by
using either detours or limited night work.

Traffic handling for BR# 55C-0055 will encroach into
Caltrans Right-of-Way and affect I-5 offramp operations.

An Encroacment Permit will be obtained from the
Caltrans District 12 to facilitate stage construction and traffic handling.

STATE AND FEDERAL PROCEDURES
The City plans to utilize BPMP funds obligated through the Highway Bridge Program (HBP). Following State and Federal guidelines is key to keep federal funding intact. To not jeopardize reimbursement and eligibility, it is critical that the project delivery strictly adheres to the requirements and timelines presented in Chapter 11 of the Caltrans Local Assistance Program Guidelines. Therefore, the development of plans, specifications, and construction cost estimate (PS&E) must follow standard Caltrans (State) and FHWA requirements which include obtaining E-76 approvals, and compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and full compliance with Chapter 11 of the Local Assistance Program Guidelines.

Every Dokken Engineering project requires coordination and compliance with State and/or Federal regulations. Dokken’s team of experts have extensive experience working with Caltrans, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal and State Resource Agencies and have a thorough understanding of regulatory processes and standards. Our team understands the Caltrans and FHWA project development process and has obtained invaluable insight into the local agency side of project funding, programming, authorization paperwork, and Federal regulations that apply to local agency project delivery with Caltrans local assistance oversight. We will use these skills and knowledge (from the delivery of over 3,000 projects) to ensure projects are successfully delivered and compliant with oversight agency requirements.

Because the City is using federal funds for this project, the process to obtain project approval for funding and developing the PS&E package must follow standard Caltrans and FHWA requirements, which include compliance with NEPA/CEQA and authorizations at major milestones.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 198 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 24
The flow chart to the right identifies the Caltrans Local Assistance process and demonstrates our understanding of the paperwork required. Since our team has a proven track record of project delivery, we know this process, not only when exhibits need to be submitted but also when FHWA holds all additional funding requests to close out their fiscal year.

Depending on our client’s needs, we are available to assist with preparing the Request for Authorization (RFA) packages at all major milestones as well as project development forms (PES, Field Review, Project Change) and project delivery forms (utility coordination and right of way certification).

In addition, Dokken’s environmental staff has extensive experience with NEPA/CEQA policies and procedures. We have a close relationship with Caltrans environmental staff, and we will assist the City with all needed Caltrans paperwork. We will work closely with our design team to ensure projects do not have any unmitigable environmental impacts. We are prepared to address project impacts by including reasonable avoidance and minimization solutions early in the project design phase.

Lessons Learned
Through our 39 years of experience, our team has gained knowledge from several valuable lessons learned, which has helped us succeed in delivering our clients’ projects with Federal funds.
• Have Right of Way Request for Authorization (RFA) reviewed by the District before the NEPA Environmental Document is signed. This streamlines the approval process whereby we meet with the District near the end of the environmental process to ensure they understand the project and its right of way needs.
• Have Construction RFA reviewed by District before PS&E and right of way certifications are submitted. This step includes meeting with the District near the end of the design phase to ensure the District understands the project prior to obtaining their approval on the Construction RFA. • Prepare all utility paperwork in Caltrans format and meet early in the project with the Caltrans District Local Assistance utility coordinator.

ENVIRONMENTAL
The project will utilize both local and federal funding; therefore, compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) will be required. The lead agency under NEPA is Caltrans and the lead agency under CEQA is the City. Impacts to biological and cultural resources are not anticipated. The repair work contemplated for this project qualifies to utilize a CEQA Categorical Exemption for existing facilities. For NEPA, the Project is clearly classified as a Categorical Exclusion (CE) under 23CFR 771.117 (d)(3) as bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement. Dokken’s in-house environmental team obtains environmental approval for multiple bridge projects per year, such as the National Trails Highway 10 Bridge Replacement Project in San Bernardino County and has extensive experience working with Caltrans Local Assistance. Our relationship with Caltrans environmental staff ensures the NEPA environmental process will be driven by the City’s schedule. Based on preliminary research, there are limited environmental constraints.

The City has an extensive park and trail system. Publicly-owned parks are a resource under Section 4(f) of the Transportation Act. The Santiago Park Nature Reserve, the Santiago Creek Bike Trail and the Santa Ana River Bike Trail were also partially funded under Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act; therefore, analysis for impacts to protected Section 6(f) resources will be required during NEPA clearance. Consideration should be given to facilitate park and trail activities during construction, even though the effects are of a short duration and temporary.

Biological Resources
Based on preliminary review, Dokken biologists determined that the proposed work does not have the potential to impact any threatened or endangered species or their habitat. Caltrans will likely require the preparation of a Natural Environment Study (Minimal Impacts) that would include standard avoidance, and minimization measures applicable to the proposed work.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 199 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 25
Permits
Below deck work will be required in support of repair activities; however, maintenance work on existing, serviceable structures is considered exempt from Section 404 Clean Water Act permitting and non-exempt work can be authorized under the Regional General Permit (RGP) Number 100 issued to the Orange County Flood Control Division by the Corps of Engineers. Coverage under the RGP still requires filing a Notice of Intent to the Regional Water Quality Control Board to obtain a wastewater discharge permit, but this is an expedited process which is included in our scope and fee. Lastly, it is assumed that Orange County Public Works will utilize their existing Streambed Alteration Agreement with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife that authorizes OCPW to conduct routine maintenance. Not having to obtain a USACE or CDFW permit will greatly reduce the City’s environmental clearance schedule.

MANAGEMENT APPROACH
Our project management approach is to be an extension of City staff and provide the City an experienced team. Our team will provide the resources and tools necessary to deliver this project with minimal oversight. Gabriel Hoxmeier will be the Project Manager for this project. As Project Manager, Gabriel will be responsible for communicating with the City and providing progress updates, schedule and budget control, facilitating meetings with the City and stakeholders, coordinating quality control activities, managing subconsultants, coordinating right of way acquisitions, and ensuring delivery of all project products culminating with a PS&E that is biddable and buildable.

Dokken’s project management philosophy is to treat every client as if they are our only client. We are immediately available by phone and e-mail. For us, project management means contract compliance, accurate file systems, budgets and schedules, and assembling the appropriate team to do the job right. It means monitoring subconsultant work, progress reporting, and assisting our clients with the hundreds of details involved with project delivery. Our project management approach includes:
• “No Surprises” Communication with our Clients: Dokken maintains constant communication with our clients.

Emerging issues are brought to our clients, along with proposed solutions. • Clear, Concise, and Complete Reporting: Dokken’s monthly progress reports include accomplished tasks, upcoming tasks, pending issues, and scheduled completion target dates. We coordinate and facilitate regular progress and team meetings and prepare all exhibits and handouts.
• Project Schedule Monitoring: Each of Dokken’s projects is guided by a project baseline schedule, clearly indicating milestones, major activities, and deliverables at a level of detail appropriate to the project. The schedule drives the project, not the reverse.
• Budget Control: The best way to control the budget is to follow the project schedule. This avoids costly over-runs and extended production times. The key to preserving budgets is to start on time, get it right, and submit the deliverable by the deadline.

PROJECT COMMUNICATION
As an extension of City staff, Gabriel and his team will use a suite of communication mechanisms to keep the City informed and to maintain the project schedule. The following diagram identifies the key communication methods to deliver projects for the City.

Internal: Dokken has long-standing relationships with our subconsultants, and we have established communication protocols that all team members understand. We host weekly internal team conference calls to track progress and keep everyone current on project status and recent decisions that affect their awareness and productivity.

External: Our number one goal when working with our clients is successful project delivery. We identify risks early in the process and develop ways to mitigate these risks. We work closely with our clients to keep them informed on the status of their project and any pending decisions, and we are extremely responsive to their needs.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 200 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 26
Dokken will also serve as an extension of staff on this contract and as requested can act as the principal point of contact for the City with stakeholders, resource agencies, and utility providers. Gabriel will ensure that the delivery schedule is being managed and that the City is controlling the project schedule and not the agencies. Gabriel will keep the City informed of communications with the outside agencies and elevate key decisions to City staff as required.

QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
Dokken and our team members are committed to the City to deliver project documents whose quality exceeds the standards in the industry. For our team, quality is not just a priority, it is a core value. The QA/QC procedures will be prepared and implemented in accordance with our scope of work and will be consistent with our company principles. The procedure will incorporate the approach of continuous review of products as they are developed and as a series of formal review procedures enacted at preparation of major deliverables. The policies and procedures will provide documentation that deliverables meet all requirements of the scope of work. The review of deliverables needed to satisfy the QA/QC procedure is built into our proposed schedule. The following flow chart outlines our QA/QC procedures:

We take quality very seriously, as a quality plan set provides the most competitive bidding opportunities for projects and helps keep projects within their overall budgets, ultimately resulting in a high-quality project being built, on time with minimal or no change orders.

COST CONTROL AND BUDGETING METHODOLOGY
To manage the three interdependent elements found in every project – scope, schedule, and budget – it is necessary to implement a sustainable project control methodology. Gabriel, our Project Manager, will develop and implement the project controls plan. The plan outlines the procedures for conducting work, managing project resources, and reporting project status and progress. The project management tools identified on the right assures on time and within budget project deliverables. These tools will enable Gabriel to provide a systematic approach to deliver any project. All project participants, including the City and Dokken team, will be aware of the project status in order to make informed management decisions. Our tools and system are designed to respond to these requirements.

Dokken prepares and maintains project schedules for every project. The schedules are monitored, and staffing adjusted to meet milestones. Performance is monitored through quality control checks, review of actual versus planned progress, completion of action items prepared after meetings, monthly invoicing, and progress reporting. Dokken will use the City standards and formats, making invoice review streamlined and familiar to the City. For our team, quality is not just a priority, it is a core value.

Dokken has found that the best way to control budget is to ensure the project schedule is followed. This method avoids costly over-runs and extended production times. The key to preserving budgets is to start on time, get it right, and submit the deliverable on time. Utilizing the same design working group from the beginning of the project to the end ensures consistent thought and engineering practice, while eliminating wasteful hours spent “getting familiar” with a project.

The MS Project Schedule will be supplemented with a deliverables schedule that identifies all project deliverables and submittal dates. The deliverables schedule is a critical project management tool because it specifies what is being delivered to the client and when it is to be submitted. The deliverables schedule will be updated monthly and submitted as part of the monthly invoice to report on the status of completed, in-progress, and upcoming deliverables. The combination of the budget and schedule showing task durations and sequencing will enable us to produce a time-phased budget. With a time-phased budget and a work-based method of measuring progress, a reliable comparison on planned versus actual can be made.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 201 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 27

REFERENCES
The following examples highlight Dokken’s ability to provide services similar in size, scope, and complexity to the Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program project. Together, with the technical specialties of our subconsultants, the Dokken team assures the City that our proven management and quality services will be provided.

City of Palm Desert Bridge Maintenance | Palm Desert, CA The City of Palm Desert contracted Dokken to create and implement a City-wide Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program.

As a first task, Dokken reviewed the Caltrans inventory of City owned bridges and existing maintenance agreements for each bridge within the City limits to identify any bridges that needed to be added to the Caltrans inventory and coordinated with Caltrans Structures Maintenance and Investigations (SM&I) to submit Request for Bridge Name and Number forms to allow unidentified bridges to be added to the Caltrans inventory for routine inspection by Caltrans and eligibility for Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funding.

Dokken reviewed all available Bridge Inspection Reports (BIRIS) provided by Caltrans and conducted photo documented field investigations of 17 vehicular and pedestrian bridges to confirm Caltrans Bridge Inspection Report findings, identify additional maintenance work recommendations not covered by the inspection reports, and develop preliminary construction cost estimates to perform the preventive maintenance work for each bridge. Dokken then collaborated with the City to develop a ranking procedure and prioritization plan complying with the Caltrans Bridge Preventive Maintenance Guidelines for Local Agencies, and summarized the findings in a Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program report. A comprehensive Bridge Preventive Maintenance Plan spreadsheet conforming to the Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Guidelines, detailing bridge locations, applicable sufficiency ratings, work descriptions, and total HBP eligible participating cost share items was developed and submitted to Caltrans Local Assistance and Headquarters for approval and programming.

Dokken worked closely with the City to develop a strategize a phased approach to implementing bridge preventive maintenance improvements given the City’s budget allocations for maintenance over the next five fiscal years. The first phase of implementation included the preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimate for the preventive maintenance of five vehicular structures. Work included concrete spall repair, expansion joint removal and replacement, installation of concrete expansion dams at select locations to prevent asphalt concrete overlays from fouling expansion joints, and the repair of a corrugated metal pipe arch (CMPA) culvert bank that included partial removal of damaged CMPA sections and splicing on new SCMPA sections utilizing a metal collar. Construction for the first phase was completed in November 2023. The second phase of implementation includes the
preparation of Plans, Specifications, and
Estimate for the preventive maintenance of
two vehicular structures, with an anticipated
start of construction in Spring 2025. Proposed
work includes a methacrylate overlay, existing
joint seal replacement, and side-drain ditch
repairs for the Tierra Del Oro bridge over the
South Palm Canyon Wash, and asphalt
concrete removal, methacrylate overlay, and
new asphalt concrete overlay for the Palm
Canyon Drive Bridge over the Rancho Mirage
Channel. Approach roadway on both ends of
the bridges will undergo a grind and overlay as
part of this project. Stage Construction, Traffic
Control, and Temporary Traffic Modification
plans are included as part of this work.

CLIENT REFERENCE
City of Palm Desert
Neal Ennis, PE
(760) 776-6493
[email protected]
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 202 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 28
Master Agreement Consulting Services – Structural
Engineering | Carlsbad, CA
2016-2017 Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program:

As part of a Master Service Agreement contract, Dokken
was tasked with reviewing existing Caltrans Bridge
Inspection Reports, the existing Bridge Preventive
Maintenance Program (BPMP) report and conducting
field investigations with accompanying documentation
memorandum for 10 individual vehicular and pedestrian
bridges scheduled for upcoming maintenance within the
City of Carlsbad. Dokken worked closely with the City to determine immediate priority for bridge repair work, and developed PS&E for the preventive maintenance of the
Calle Barcelona Pedestrian Overcrossing and the
Poinsettia Lane Overhead; spanning over the North
County Transit District (NCTD) owned tracks near the
Pacific Coast.

Plans and Specifications were also developed to replace the original bridge railings as well as repair the sidewalk approach railings which suffered from severe concrete
spalling and corrosion from improper concrete cover over reinforcement and marine environment exposure. Railroad coordination was required due to work directly over NCTD tracks. 2018-2019 Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program: The
City of Carlsbad contacted Dokken Engineering for the
PS&E for bridge preventative maintenance repairs for two structures. Jefferson Street Bridge involved providing a methacrylate overlay to seal existing deck cracks,
replacement and repairs to existing bridge railings and metal beam guard railing approach systems, as well as
sidewalk remediation to meet ADA standards. El Camino
Real Bridge at San Marcos Creek involved methacrylate
overlay in multiple stages with traffic handling plans
reviewed and approved by Caltrans to receive the
Encroachment Permit to perform the work. Pressure
grouting of deteriorated slopes below sidewalk curb
ramps was performed to mitigate more costly repairs in
the future.
2022 Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program – Field
Review and Documentation Memorandum: This task included the review of the existing Bridge Inspection Reports (BIR), the existing Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program (BPMP) report to confirm maintenance work items and update the City’s BPMP Prioritization list, and field investigations and photo documentation of the remaining 24 bridges in the City’s inventory not previously documented in the 2016-2017 program.

Maintenance needs in comparison with the existing BIRs and BPMP and close communication with the City helped to determine the priority of bridge repair works. A comprehensive photo-documented memorandum with itemized cost estimates was prepared detailing recommended bridge preventive maintenance work for each bridge.

CLIENT REFERENCE
City of Carlsbad
Emad Elias, PE
(formerly with the City of Carlsbad)
(760) 744-1050 x3225
[email protected]
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 203 8/4/2026
Request for Proposals
Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program
RFP No. 25-081A
PAGE 29
Orange County Bridge Maintenance | Orange County, CA
Dokken is providing engineering services for maintenance on multiple bridges throughout Orange County. Plans, specifications, and estimates have been prepared for maintenance repairs of 28 bridges. Project tasks included field inspections to identify repair needs, developing PS&E, attending meetings with construction staff including Job Order Contracting (JOC) staff, preparing Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and field visits during construction.

Projects were selected from a previous study prepared by Dokken in which most County bridges were inspected, maintenance repair needs identified, and a repair prioritization list developed. Maintenance needs have included concrete spall repair, polyester concrete overlays, joint seal replacements, erosion control and scour measures, barrier rail repairs, approach sidewalk replacement, addressing drainage problem and resulting erosion, and epoxy crack injection.

Repair projects of specific interest include:
55C0176 Kitterman Drive: Due to concrete RSP combined with extremely high creek velocities, localized scour was exacerbated downstream of the concreted RSP. In lieu of constructing a series of cut-off walls buttressed with large RSP over 300ft downstream, the fully grouted concrete rock slope protection was removed, the creek bottom was restored, and RSP along with hydroseed was provided along the creek banks to help mitigate the undermining of the abutments and retaining walls. 55C0606 Oso Parkway: In addition to preventive maintenance needs, joint seal replacement and clearing and flushing deck drains, significant abutment slope embankment erosion was repaired and water dripping from a bridge cell was investigated. With the help of a manlift operator and a Confined Space Entry team, Dokken inspected the bridge cell. The inspection revealed the water source was flowing from the detached electrical conduits, with water entering the conduits from beyond the bridge abutment. Maintenance repairs are ongoing.
55C0122 and 55C0123 Brea Canyon: The existing open window barrier is experiencing concrete spalling and decay. Since these bridges are scheduled for replacement, in lieu of total barrier replacement, nested double thrie beam was mounted to the face of the barrier. This approach yielded significant cost savings and avoided environmental historical review of the barrier.
55C0631 Harbor Boulevard: A fire in front of the abutment caused precast girders to spall. Dokken inspected and categorized the spall locations and developed PS&E for the repair.
55C0017 Lincoln Avenue and 55C0097 Talbert-MacArthur: Approach sidewalks at both bridges had significant spalls and settlement due to bridge thermal expansion. Repairs included reconstructing the sidewalk to repair damage and meet ADA. 55C0572 Irvine Avenue: The top slab of this culvert/bridge has significant cracks and efflorescence is leaching onto the soffit. Repairs include epoxy crack injection into the soffit and wall crack.

CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE
Dokken Engineering and our subconsultants’ vehicles are exempt from the CARB Fleet Compliance requirements and therefore cannot provide Certificates of Reported Compliance. Our team’s Fleet Compliance Certification (Attachment J) is included in the Required Forms section of this proposal.

CLIENT REFERENCE
Orange County Public Works
Co Phung, PE
(714) 245-4594
[email protected]
Kitterman Drive
Oso Parkway
Brea Canyon
Irvine Avenue
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 204 8/4/2026

REQUIRED FORMS
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 205 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Certification - I certify that I have read, understand and agree to the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposals. I have examined the Scope of Services (Exhibit I) and am qualified to provide services being requested as specified herein. I understand and agree that I am responsible for reporting any errors, omissions or discrepancies to the City for clarification prior to the submission of my proposal.

PROPOSER’S STATEMENT: I have read, understood and agree to the terms and conditions on all pages of the Request for Proposals. Upon request, I will transfer and deliver goods or services to the City in accordance with said terms and conditions.
__________________________________________________________________________________

LEGAL NAME OF COMPANY PHONE AND FAX NUMBERS
__________________________________________________________________________________

BUSINESS ADDRESS
__________________________________________________________________________________

PRINTED NAME OF AUTHORIZED AGENT TITLE
__________________________________________________________________________________

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED AGENT DATE E-MAIL ADDRESS
__________________________________________________________________________________

FEDERAL ID NUMBER (IF APPLICABLE) CONTRACTOR LICENSE NUMBER (IFAPPLICABLE)
__________________________________________________________________________________

CITY OF SANTA ANA BUSINESS LICENSE NUMBER
(PLEASE PROVIDE IF AVAILABLE, BUT NOT REQUIRED UNTIL AND IF AN AWARD IS MADE TO PROPOSER.) THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT A
PROPOSER’S CERTIFICATION, PROPOSAL PRICING
'RNNHQ(QJLQHHULQJ






%OXH5DYLQH5RDG6XLWH)ROVRP&$

-RKQ$.OHPXQHV-U3( 3UHVLGHQW
 MNOHPXQHV#GRNNHQHQJLQHHULQJFRP



1$
1$
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 206 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Proposer understands and agrees that this written RFP (or any part thereof specifically designated and accepted by the City of Santa Ana, hereinafter City) shall constitute the entire agreement between proposer and the City only after it has been accepted by the City Council, endorsed by the Clerk of the Council with her signature and official seal noting hereon the action of approval of the Council, signed by the Executive Director or his duly authorized agent, and signed by the City Attorney, denoting his approval of the form of this document, and its execution, and when it or an exact copy of it has been either delivered to proposer or deposited with the United States Postal Service properly addressed to the proposer with the correct postage affixed thereto.

Proposer further agrees that upon delivery (as defined above) of the accepted agreement he/she will furnish City all required bonds and certificate of liability insurance within ten (10) days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and City’s legal holidays), or the funds, check, draft, or proposer’s bond substituted in lieu thereof accompanying this proposal shall become the property of the City and shall be considered as payment of damages due to the delay and other causes suffered by City because of the failure to furnish the necessary bonds and because it is distinctly agreed that the proof of damages actually suffered by City is difficult to ascertain; otherwise said funds, check drafts, or proposer’s bond substituted in lieu thereof shall be returned to the undersigned.

Proposer understands that a proposal is required for the entire work, that the estimated quantities set forth in the RFP schedule are solely for the purpose of comparing proposals, and that final compensation under the contract will be based upon the actual quantities of work satisfactorily completed.

All terms contained in the specifications, the certification of nondiscrimination by contractors, and the required insurance certificates are to be incorporated by reference into this agreement and are made specifically as part of this RFP.

Firm________________________________________________________________________________ Signed and Printed Name: ______________________________________________________________ Title ________________________________________________________________________________ Date
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT B
PROPOSER’S STATEMENT
'RNNHQ(QJLQHHULQJ
-RKQ$.OHPXQHV-U3(
3UHVLGHQW

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 207 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 208 8/4/2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 209 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities," in conformance with its instructions.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

Signed:

Title:

Firm:

Date:

THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT D

NON-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
3UHVLGHQW
'RNNHQ(QJLQHHULQJ

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 210 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
The undersigned consultant or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows:

1. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.

2. The Consultant shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

3. The Consultant shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers’ representatives of the Consultant’s commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.

4. The Consultant shall comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor.

5. The Consultant shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders.

1. In the event of the Consultant’s non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.

2. The Consultant shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract

ATTACHMENT E

NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 211 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the California Air Resources Board’s policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the “Regulation”). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder’s fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) (“Fleet”) is true and correct:

The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto.

The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto.

Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. third-party correspondence or vendor bids).

The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regulation pursuant to section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an Emergency, as defined under section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained, pursuant to section 2449(i)(4).

The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempted and a detailed reasoning is attached hereto.
_________________________________________________________________ Bidder’s Company Name (please print or type)
__________________________________________________________________ Signature of Bidder
__________________________________________________________________ Print Name
__________________________________________________________________ Title
___________________________________

DOORS ID
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT G

CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION
'RNNHQ(QJLQHHULQJ
-RKQ$.OHPXQHV-U3(
3UHVLGHQW
;

'RNNHQ(QJLQHHULQJRSHUDWHVDVWDQGDUGIOHHWRIYHKLFOHVWKDWDUHQRWVXEMHFWWRWKHSURYLVLRQVRXWOLQHGLQWKH UHIHUHQFHGUHJXODWLRQ2XUIOHHWYHKLFOHVGRQRWFRQWDLQGLHVHOWUXFNVRIIURDGHQJLQHVHWF7KHUHIRUH'RNNHQ (QJLQHHULQJLVH[HPSWIURPWKLV7LWOH&DOLIRUQLD&RGHRI5HJXODWLRQV'LYLVLRQ&KDSWHU 
1$
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 212 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the California Air Resources Board’s policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the “Regulation”). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder’s fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) (“Fleet”) is true and correct:

The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto.

The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto.

Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. third-party correspondence or vendor bids).

The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regulation pursuant to section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an Emergency, as defined under section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained, pursuant to section 2449(i)(4).

The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempted and a detailed reasoning is attached hereto.
_%XUQH(QJLQHHULQJ6HUYLFHV,QF______________________________________ Bidder’s Company Name (please print or type)
__________________________________________________________________ Signature of Bidder
__3UDQYHUD'H6DIH\______________________________________________ Print Name
__2SHUDWLRQV0DQDJHU_______________________________________________ Title
________1$___________________________

DOORS ID

ATTACHMENT G

CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 213 8/4/2026
#VSOF
&OHJOFFSJOH
PQFSBUFT
B
TUBOEBSE
GMFFU
PG
WFIJDMFT
UIBU
BSF
OPU
TVCKFDU
UP
UIF
QSPWJTJPOT
PVUMJOFE
JO
UIF
SFGFSFODFE
SFHVMBUJPO
0VS
GMFFU
WFIJDMFT
EP
OPU
DPOUBJO
EJFTFM
USVDLT
PGGSPBE

FOHJOFT

FUD
5IFSFGPSF

#VSOF
&OHJOFFSJOH
JT
FYFNQU
GSPN
UIJT
5JUMF


$BMJGPSOJB
$PEF
PG

3FHVMBUJPOT

%JWJTJPO


$IBQUFS


EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 214 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the California Air Resources Board’s policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the “Regulation”). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder’s fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) (“Fleet”) is true and correct:

The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto.

The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto.

Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. third-party correspondence or vendor bids).

The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regulation pursuant to section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an Emergency, as defined under section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained, pursuant to section 2449(i)(4).

The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempted and a detailed reasoning is attached hereto.
_________________________________________________________________ Bidder’s Company Name (please print or type)
__________________________________________________________________ Signature of Bidder
__________________________________________________________________ Print Name
__________________________________________________________________ Title
___________________________________

DOORS ID
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT G

CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION
Geocon Consultants, Inc.

Josh Ewert, PG
Vice President
p y
________________
Signature of Bidder
;
1$
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 215 8/4/2026

CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION
Geocon is exempt because we will not be using any off-road vehicles or even diesel-fueled vehicles for this project. The only vehicles we’re likely to use are trucks running on unleaded gasoline.

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 216 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the California Air Resources Board’s policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the “Regulation”). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder’s fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) (“Fleet”) is true and correct:

The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto.

The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto.

Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. third-party correspondence or vendor bids).

The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regulation pursuant to section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an Emergency, as defined under section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained, pursuant to section 2449(i)(4).

The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempted and a detailed reasoning is attached hereto.
_________________________________________________________________ Bidder’s Company Name (please print or type)
__________________________________________________________________ Signature of Bidder
__________________________________________________________________ Print Name
__________________________________________________________________ Title
___________________________________

DOORS ID
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT G

CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION

OPTIME CONSULTING GROUP

KAMRAN AMINI
Principal
N/A
x
dder’s Company Name (plea
________________________
gnature of Bidder
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 217 8/4/2026
June 29, 2025
OPTIME
Consulting Group
7244 Hillside Ave, Unit 201
Los Angeles, CA 90046
To Whom It May Concern,
Optime Consulting Group owns no off-road diesel equipment.

Any gear we bring to the project will be electric or, if needed, rented equipment; we will operate no diesel off-road units, so Title 13 CCR §2449 does not apply, and no DOORS fleet ID is required.

Sincerely,
Optime Consulting Group
Kamran Amini, Ph.D., P.E.

Principal & Senior Consultant
[email protected]
Phone: +1 (216) 577 – 4173
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 218 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
This is to certify that the undersigned Proposer and subconsultants have read and undertand the CWA entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, and the signatory Craft Councils and Local Unions, effective as of June 6, 2023. The Undersigned Proposer hereby agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the CWA, and are capable of completing construction of the project continuously, without interruptions or delays. If awarded any work covered by the CWA, Proposer will also be required to sign a Letter of Assent that appears as Attachment A to the CWA documents.

Signed:

Title:

Firm:

Date:

THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT H

STATEMENT REGARDING COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA)

REQUIREMENTS
3UHVLGHQW
'RNNHQ(QJLQHHULQJ

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 219 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
This is to certify that the undersigned Proposer and subconsultants have read and undertand the CWA entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, and the signatory Craft Councils and Local Unions, effective as of June 6, 2023. The Undersigned Proposer hereby agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the CWA, and are capable of completing construction of the project continuously, without interruptions or delays. If awarded any work covered by the CWA, Proposer will also be required to sign a Letter of Assent that appears as Attachment A to the CWA documents.

Signed:

Title:

Firm:

Date:

THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT H

STATEMENT REGARDING COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA)

REQUIREMENTS
2SHUDWLRQV0DQDJHU
%XUQH(QJLQHHULQJ6HUYLFHV,QF

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 220 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
This is to certify that the undersigned Proposer and subconsultants have read and undertand the CWA entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, and the signatory Craft Councils and Local Unions, effective as of June 6, 2023. The Undersigned Proposer hereby agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the CWA, and are capable of completing construction of the project continuously, without interruptions or delays. If awarded any work covered by the CWA, Proposer will also be required to sign a Letter of Assent that appears as Attachment A to the CWA documents.

Signed:

Title:

Firm:

Date:

THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT H

STATEMENT REGARDING COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA)

REQUIREMENTS
Josh Ewert, PG | Vice President
Geocon Consultants, Inc.

June 30, 2025
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 221 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
This is to certify that the undersigned Proposer and subconsultants have read and undertand the CWA entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council, and the signatory Craft Councils and Local Unions, effective as of June 6, 2023. The Undersigned Proposer hereby agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the CWA, and are capable of completing construction of the project continuously, without interruptions or delays. If awarded any work covered by the CWA, Proposer will also be required to sign a Letter of Assent that appears as Attachment A to the CWA documents.

Signed:

Title:

Firm:

Date:

THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT H

STATEMENT REGARDING COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA)

REQUIREMENTS
Principal
Optime Consulting Group
6/29/2025
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 222 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
On April 4, 2022, the federal government stopped using the DUNS Number to uniquely identify entities.

Now, entities doing business with the federal government use the Unique Entity ID created in SAM.gov.

They no longer have to go to a third-party website to obtain their identifier. This transition allows the government to streamline the entity identification and validation process, making it easier and less burdensome for entities to do business with the federal government.

This RFP includes federal funding, and as such, the proposer must provide verification of their SAM.gov UEI and registration status. Please attach your entity’s registration from SAM.gov, including UEI and active registration status.

Proposer’s UEI:_______________________________________________ SAM.gov Registration Expiration Date:

ATTACHMENT I
SAM.GOV UEI VERIFICATION
''/*3.66$*4

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 223 8/4/2026

DOKKEN ENGINEERING
Unique Entity ID
DDLGPKSSAGQ7

CAGE / NCAGE
1D7N3
Purpose of Registration
All Awards
Registration Status
Active Registration
Expiration Date
Dec 13, 2025
Physical Address
110 Blue Ravine RD
STE 200
Folsom, California 95630-4713
United States
Mailing Address
110 Blue Ravine RD STE 200
Folsom, California 95630-4713
United States
Business Information
Doing Business as
(blank)
Division Name
(blank)
Division Number
(blank)
Congressional District
California 03
State / Country of Incorporation
California / United States
URL
(blank)
Registration Dates
Activation Date
Dec 17, 2024
Submission Date
Dec 13, 2024
Initial Registration Date
Jun 1, 2000
Entity Dates
Entity Start Date
Jun 20, 1986
Fiscal Year End Close Date
Dec 31
Immediate Owner
CAGE
(blank)
Legal Business Name
(blank)
Highest Level Owner
CAGE
(blank)
Legal Business Name
(blank)
Executive Compensation
In your business or organization's preceding completed fiscal year, did your business or organization (the legal entity to which this specific SAM record, represented by a Unique Entity ID, belongs) receive both of the following: 1. 80 percent or more of your annual gross revenues in U.S. federal contracts, subcontracts, loans, grants, subgrants, and/or cooperative agreements and 2. $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenues from U.S. federal contracts, subcontracts, loans, grants, subgrants, and/or cooperative agreements? No
Does the public have access to information about the compensation of the senior executives in your business or organization (the legal entity to which this specific SAM record, represented by a Unique Entity ID, belongs) through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986? Not Selected
Proceedings Questions
Is your business or organization, as represented by the Unique Entity ID on this entity registration, responding to a Federal procurement opportunity that contains the provision at FAR 52.209-7, subject to the clause in FAR 52.209-9 in a current Federal contract, or applying for a Federal grant opportunity which contains the award term and condition described in 2 C.F.R. 200 Appendix XII? No
Does your business or organization, as represented by the Unique Entity ID on this specific SAM record, have current active Federal contracts and/or grants with total value (including any exercised/unexercised options) greater than $10,000,000? Not Selected
Within the last five years, had the business or organization (represented by the Unique Entity ID on this specific SAM record) and/or any of its principals, in connection with the award to or performance by the business or organization of a Federal contract or grant, been the subject of a Federal or State (1) criminal proceeding resulting in a conviction or other acknowledgment of fault; (2) civil proceeding resulting in a finding of fault with a monetary fine, penalty, reimbursement, restitution, and/or damages greater than $5,000, or other acknowledgment of fault; and/or (3) administrative proceeding resulting in a finding of fault with either a monetary fine or penalty greater than $5,000 or reimbursement, restitution, or damages greater than $100,000, or other acknowledgment of fault?
Not Selected
Last updated by Amber Smith on Dec 13, 2024 at 01:33 PM DOKKEN ENGINEERING May 20, 2025 03:30:47 PM GMT
https://sam.gov/entity/DDLGPKSSAGQ7/coreData?status=null Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 224 8/4/2026
Exclusion Summary
Active Exclusions Records?
No
SAM Search Authorization
I authorize my entity's non-sensitive information to be displayed in SAM public search results:

Yes
Entity Types
Business Types
Entity Structure
Corporate Entity (Not Tax Exempt)
Entity Type
Business or Organization
Organization Factors
(blank)
Profit Structure
For Profit Organization
Socio-Economic Types
Check the registrant's Reps & Certs, if present, under FAR 52.212-3 or FAR 52.219-1 to determine if the entity is an SBA-certified HUBZone small business concern. Additional small business information may be found in the SBA's Dynamic Small Business Search if the entity completed the SBA supplemental pages during registration.

Financial Information
Accepts Credit Card Payments
No
Debt Subject To Offset
No
EFT Indicator
0000
CAGE Code
1D7N3
Electronic Funds Transfer
Account Type
Checking
Routing Number
*******27
Lock Box Number
(blank)
Financial Institution

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA
Account Number
*******33
Automated Clearing House
Phone (U.S.)
8134323700
Email
(blank)
Phone (non-U.S.)
(blank)
Fax
(blank)
Remittance Address

DOKKEN ENGINEERING
110 Blue Ravine ROAD, Suite 200
Folsom, California 95630
United States
Taxpayer Information
EIN
*****9664
Type of Tax
Applicable Federal Tax
Taxpayer Name

DOKKEN ENGINEERING
Tax Year (Most Recent Tax Year)
2021
Name/Title of Individual Executing Consent
Chairman
TIN Consent Date
Dec 13, 2024
Address
110 Blue Ravine RD STE 200
Folsom, California 95630
Signature

RICHARD DOKKEN
Points of Contact
Accounts Receivable POC
Amber Smith
[email protected]
9168580642
Last updated by Amber Smith on Dec 13, 2024 at 01:33 PM DOKKEN ENGINEERING May 20, 2025 03:30:47 PM GMT
https://sam.gov/entity/DDLGPKSSAGQ7/coreData?status=null Page 2 of 3 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 225 8/4/2026
Electronic Business
Cathy Chan
[email protected]
9168580642
110 Blue Ravine ROAD, Suite 200
Folsom, California 95630
United States

CATHY CHAN
[email protected]
9168580642
100 Blue Ravine ROAD, Suite 200
Folsom, California 95630
United States
Government Business
Camran Sadeghi
[email protected]
9168580642
110 Blue Ravine ROAD, Suite 200
Folsom, California 95630
United States
John Klemunes, President
[email protected]
9168580642
110 Blue Ravine ROAD, Suite 200
Folsom, California 95630
United States
Past Performance
RICHARD DOKKEN, Chairman
[email protected]
9168580642
110 Blue Ravine ROAD, Suite 200
Folsom, California 95630
United States

RICHARD LIPTAK, CEO
[email protected]
9168580642
110 Blue Ravine ROAD, Suite 200
Folsom, California 95630
United States
Service Classifications
NAICS Codes
Primary
Yes
NAICS Codes
541330
NAICS Title
Engineering Services
Size Metrics
IGT Size Metrics
Annual Revenue (from all IGTs)
(blank)
Worldwide
Annual Receipts (in accordance with 13 CFR 121)
$33,562,026.00
Number of Employees (in accordance with 13 CFR 121)
153
Location
Annual Receipts (in accordance with 13 CFR 121)
(blank)
Number of Employees (in accordance with 13 CFR 121)
(blank)
Industry-Specific
Barrels Capacity
(blank)
Megawatt Hours
(blank)
Total Assets
(blank)
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) Information
This entity did not enter the EDI information
Disaster Response
This entity does not appear in the disaster response registry.

Last updated by Amber Smith on Dec 13, 2024 at 01:33 PM DOKKEN ENGINEERING May 20, 2025 03:30:47 PM GMT
https://sam.gov/entity/DDLGPKSSAGQ7/coreData?status=null Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 226 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, as amended, Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension, 2 CFR Part 2998, Subpart C, Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions. The regulations were published as Part VII of the May 26, 1988, Federal Register (Pages 19160-19211), and as subsequently amended in 81 Federal Register 25585. (Before completing certification, read instructions which are an integral part of certification)

1. Pursuant to 2 CFR 180.335, the prospective primary participant, (i.e. grantee) certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
a. Are not presently excluded or disqualified;
b. Have not been convicted within the preceding three years of any of the offenses listed in 2CFR 180.800(a) or had a civil judgment rendered against them for one of those offenses within that time period.
c. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses listed in 2 CFR 180.800(a);and
d. Have not had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated within the preceding three years for cause or default.

2. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

Consultant
Name and Title of Official Authorized to Certify
On Behalf of the Consultant
Date
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.

PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

ATTACHMENT J

CERTIFICATE REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INEGIBILITY AND

VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION
'RNNHQ(QJLQHHULQJ
-RKQ$.OHPXQHV-U3(3UHVLGHQW

EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 227 8/4/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA
(Refer to the following Forms)

ATTACHMENT K
FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS – CALTRANS FORMS
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 22 /4/2026
/RFDO $VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV 0DQXDO ([KLELW 2
&RQVXOWDQW3URSRVDO'%( &RPPLWPHQW
(;+,%,72&2168/7$17352326$/'%(&200,70(17
 /RFDO $JHQF\
 &RQWUDFW '%( *RDO

 3URMHFW 'HVFULSWLRQ

 3URMHFW /RFDWLRQ

 &RQVXOWDQW
V 1DPH
  3ULPH&HUWLILHG'%(
 †
 'HVFULSWLRQRI:RUN6HUYLFHRU 0DWHULDOV
6XSSOLHG
 '%(
&HUWLILFDWLRQ
1XPEHU
/RFDO$JHQF\ WR &RPSOHWHWKLV6HFWLRQ
 /RFDO $JHQF\ &RQWUDFW 1XPEHU

 )HGHUDO$LG3URMHFW1XPEHU


 3URSRVHG&RQWUDFW ([HFXWLRQ'DWH


 /RFDO$JHQF\5HSUHVHQWDWLYH
V6LJQDWXUH  'DWH
 /RFDO$JHQF\5HSUHVHQWDWLYH
V1DPH  3KRQH
 /RFDO$JHQF\5HSUHVHQWDWLYH
V7LWOH
&RQVXOWDQW¶V 5DQNLQJDIWHU(YDOXDWLRQ
 BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
/RFDO$JHQF\FHUWLILHV WKDW DOO '%( FHUWLILFDWLRQV DUHYDOLGDQGLQIRUPDWLRQRQ WKLV IRUP LVFRPSOHWHDQGDFFXUDWH

 '%(&RQWDFW ,QIRUPDWLRQ
 727$/ &/$,0(''%(3$57,&,3$7,21
 '%( 

,03257$17
,GHQWLI\DOO'%(ILUPVEHLQJFODLPHGIRU FUHGLW
UHJDUGOHVVRI WLHU:ULWWHQ FRQILUPDWLRQRI HDFK OLVWHG'%( LV UHTXLUHG
3UHSDUHU
V 6LJQDWXUH 'DWH
3UHSDUHU
V 1DPH 3KRQH
3UHSDUHU
V 7LWOH
',675,%87,21
 2ULJLQDO±,QFOXGHG ZLWKFRQVXOWDQW¶VSURSRVDOWRORFDO DJHQF\ $'$1RWLFH
 )RU LQGLYLGXDOVZLWKVHQVRU\ GLVDELOLWLHV WKLVGRFXPHQW LV DYDLODEOHLQDOWHUQDWHIRUPDWV )RU LQIRUPDWLRQFDOO


RU 7''



RUZULWH5HFRUGVDQG)RUPV 0DQDJHPHQW 16WUHHW 06  6DFUDPHQWR &$

/33  3DJHRI
-DQXDU\

'RNNHQ(QJLQHHULQJ,QF
-RKQ$.OHPXQHV-U3(




3UHVLGHQW
6WUXFWXUHV'HVLJQ
%XUQH(QJLQHHULQJ,QF
*ROGHQ)RRWKLOO3NZ\6XLWH
(O'RUDGR+LOOV&$





Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program for eight (8) bridges City of Santa Ana 4%
Various Locations in Santa Ana
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 229 8/4/2026
/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO ([KLELW2
&RQVXOWDQW&RQWUDFW'%(&RPPLWPHQW
(;+,%,72&2168/7$17&2175$&7'%(&200,70(17
 /RFDO$JHQF\
 &RQWUDFW'%(*RDO

 3URMHFW'HVFULSWLRQ

 3URMHFW/RFDWLRQ

 &RQVXOWDQW
V1DPH
 3ULPH&HUWLILHG'%(
 † 7RWDO&RQWUDFW$ZDUG$PRXQW

 7RWDO'ROODU$PRXQWIRU$//6XEFRQVXOWDQWV

 7RWDO1XPEHURI$//6XEFRQVXOWDQWV

 'HVFULSWLRQRI:RUN6HUYLFHRU0DWHULDOV
6XSSOLHG
 '%(
&HUWLILFDWLRQ
1XPEHU
 '%(&RQWDFW,QIRUPDWLRQ
 '%(
'ROODU
$PRXQW
/RFDO$JHQF\WR&RPSOHWHWKLV6HFWLRQ
 727$/&/$,0(''%(3$57,&,3$7,21
 /RFDO$JHQF\&RQWUDFW
1XPEHU

 )HGHUDO$LG3URMHFW1XPEHU

 &RQWUDFW([HFXWLRQ
'DWH

/RFDO$JHQF\FHUWLILHVWKDWDOO'%(FHUWLILFDWLRQVDUHYDOLGDQGLQIRUPDWLRQRQ WKLVIRUPLVFRPSOHWHDQGDFFXUDWH
 /RFDO$JHQF\5HSUHVHQWDWLYH
V6LJQDWXUH 'DWH
 /RFDO$JHQF\5HSUHVHQWDWLYH
V1DPH 3KRQH
 /RFDO$JHQF\5HSUHVHQWDWLYH
V7LWOH

,03257$17
,GHQWLI\DOO'%(ILUPVEHLQJFODLPHGIRUFUHGLW
UHJDUGOHVVRIWLHU:ULWWHQFRQILUPDWLRQRIHDFKOLVWHG'%(LV UHTXLUHG
3UHSDUHU
V6LJQDWXUH 'DWH
3UHSDUHU
V1DPH 3KRQH

3UHSDUHU
V7LWOH
',675,%87,21
 2ULJLQDO±/RFDO$JHQF\
 &RS\±&DOWUDQV'LVWULFW/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH(QJLQHHU
'/$(
)DLOXUHWRVXEPLWWR'/$(ZLWKLQGD\VRIFRQWUDFW
H[HFXWLRQPD\UHVXOWLQGHREOLJDWLRQRIIHGHUDOIXQGVRQFRQWUDFW $'$1RWLFH
 )RULQGLYLGXDOVZLWKVHQVRU\GLVDELOLWLHVWKLVGRFXPHQWLVDYDLODEOHLQDOWHUQDWHIRUPDWV )RULQIRUPDWLRQFDOO


RU7''



RUZULWH5HFRUGVDQG)RUPV0DQDJHPHQW16WUHHW06 6DFUDPHQWR&$

3DJHRI
-XO\
'RNNHQ(QJLQHHULQJ
-RKQ$.OHPXQHV-U3(
3UHVLGHQW




6WUXFWXUHV'HVLJQ 



%XUQH(QJLQHHULQJ,QF
*ROGHQ)RRWKLOO3NZ\6XLWH
(O'RUDGR+LOOV&$




Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program for eight (8) bridges City of Santa Ana 4%
Various Locations in Santa Ana
$167,833
$757,183
EXHIBIT 2
City Council 23 – 230 8/4/2026
STATE OF CALIFORNIA • DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

PROJECT AUTHORIZATION/ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
DOT LAPM 3-A (REV 10/2024)
Local Assistance Procedures Manual