EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. CITY BACKGROUND ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 3 II. OVERVIEW OF PROJECT ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 3 III. TERM OF AGREEMENT ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 3 IV. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 4 V. RESPONSE TO RFP ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 4 VI. CERTIFICATIONS (ATTACHMENTS) ................................ ................................ ......................... 9 VII. REFERENCES ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ 9 VIII. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE ................................ ................................ ....... 10 IX. SELECTION PROCEDURES & CRITERIA ................................ ................................ ............... 10 X. WITHDRAWALS................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ 11 XI. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ................................ ................................ .................... 11 XII. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS ........................ 16 XIII FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS ................................ ................................ .................... 19 XIV. AWARD OF AGREEMENT ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 20 XV. IMPLEMENTATION ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 20
EXHIBITS
Exhibits provided herein for Proposers’ reference only.
EXHIBIT I – SCOPE OF SERVICES
EXHIBIT II – SAMPLE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT III – FEDERAL REGULATIONS
EXHIBIT IV – COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA)
EXHIBIT V – BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORTS
EXHIBIT VI – LOCATION MAP AND BPMP PLAN
ATTACHMENTS
A PROPOSER’S CERTIFICATION, PROPOSAL ITEM PRICING
B PROPOSER’S STATEMENT
C NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
D NON-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
E NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION
F SUBCONTRACTOR DESIGNATION FORM
G CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION
H STATEMENT REGARDING CWA REQUIREMENTS
I SAM.GOV UEI VERIFICATION
J CERTIFICATE REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION,
INEGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION
K FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS – CALTRANS FORMS
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
I. CITY BACKGROUND
The City of Santa Ana, California, is rich in culture and pride, the county seat of Orange County, and encompasses an area of approximately 27 square miles. For more information, please visit https://www.santa-ana.org/
II. OVERVIEW OF PROJECT
The City of Santa Ana (City) is s eeking proposals from qualified firms and organizations (Proposers) to provide Professional Engineering Design Services for eight (8) bridges for the Bridge Preventative Maintenance Programp (BPMP) Project , Federal Aid Project Number BPMPL 5063(220). See EXHIBIT I for complete Scope of Services.
The term “Vendor”, “Proposer”, “Consultant”, “Firm”, and “Contractor” shall refer to any legal entity or entities submitting a proposal in response to this Request for Proposals (RFP).
Project may be funded with State and Federal grant funds administered by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Special conditions shall apply. Refer to Scope of Work for further information.
CARB FLEET REGULATIONS : The California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) implemented amendments to the In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulations (“Regulation”) which are effective on January 1, 2024 and apply broadly to all self -propelled off road diesel vehicles 25 horsepower or greater and other forms of equipment used in California. A copy of the Regulation is available at:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/barcu/regact/2022/off-roaddiesel/appa-1.pdf.
Proposers are required to comply with all CARB and Regulation requirements, including, without limitation, all applicable sections of the Regulation, as codified in Title 13 of the California Code of Regulations section 2449 et seq. throughout the durat ion of the Project. Proposers must provide, with their Proposal, copies of Proposer’s and all listed subcontractors’ most recent, valid Certificate of Reported Compliance (“CRC”) issued by CARB. Failure to provide valid CRCs as required herein may render the Proposal non-responsive.
State and Federal grant funds administered by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) will be used to fund all or a portion of this project. The successful proposer will be required to comply with all requirement s associated with federal funding in carrying out the project. The Federal Funding Requirements and Attachment L of this RFP provides additional information on federal funding requirements.
III. TERM OF AGREEMENT
The anticipated term of the agreement is for an initial period of three (3) years. The City may, at its discretion, extend the agreement with the same or more limited scope of required services for two (2) additional one (1) year period s, upon mutual agree ment contingent upon City Council approval, or City Manager or City Attorney authorization, as appropriate. The total term of the awarded agreement shall not exceed five (5) years.
Usage is not guaranteed. Execution of an agreement between the City and successful firm(s) and/or individual(s) does not guarantee work throughout the duration of the contract period.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Numerous factors will be evaluated by the City in its delivery of project and assignments, including technical expertise required.
IV. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
1) Contractor must have been in business continuously for the most recent five (5) years prior to the date of this RFP.
2) Minimum three (3) most recent years of experience performing similar services as those detailed in the Scope of Services section of this RFP.
V. RESPONSE TO RFP
A. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
It is the responsibility of the Proposer to ensure that any proposals submitted have been uploaded to PlanetBids prior to the RFP due date and time. Proposals, including all required sections and forms, shall be submitted electronically via the City’s Bid Management System, PlanetBids. Additionally, it is a requirement that five (5) hard copy proposals be delivered to the Public Works Agency drop box located on the first floor of Ross Annex across from the Development Permit counter in an enclosed sealed envelope and marked clearly with the following:
Gentle note: staff will not timestamp or sign any hard copy deliveries as the electronic submittal by the deadline is suffice. For further instructions regarding hard copy submission of proposals, refer to PlanetBids.
PlanetBids will not accept late proposals and no exceptions shall be made. Proposers will receive an e-bid confirmation number with a time stamp from PlanetBids indicating that their proposal was submitted successfully. The City will only receive and consider those proposals that were transmitted successfully. Submit proposal online at:
http://www.planetbids.com/portal/portal.cfm?CompanyID=20137.
Proposer shall be solely responsible for informing itself with respect t o the proper utilization of the bid management system, for ensuring the capability of their computer system to upload the required documents, and for the stability of their internet service. Failure of the Proposer to successfully submit an electronic proposal shall be at the Proposer’s sole risk and no relief will be given for late and/or improperly submitted proposals. Proposers experiencing any technical difficulties with the bid submission process may contact PlanetBids at (818) 992 - “SEALED PROPOSAL FOR
BRIDGE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
RFP NO. 25-081A
IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
DO NOT OPEN WITH REGULAR MAIL.”
City of Santa Ana
Attn.: Alexandru Bangean
Public Works Agency; M-36
20 Civic Center Plaza; Ross Annex
Santa Ana, CA 92701
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
1771. Questions of a n operational nature may be directed to the City’s assigned Buyer.
Neither the City, nor PlanetBids, makes any guarantee as to the timely availability of assistance, or assurance that any given problem will be resolved by the bid submission deadline.
Proposals shall NOT be sent via telegraphic, electronic, or facsimile means.
All notifications, updates and addenda will be posted online on PlanetBids at https://www.planetbids.com/portal/portal.cfm?CompanyID=20137. Proposers shall be responsible for monitoring the site to obtain information regarding this solicitation. Failure to respond to required updates may result in a determination of a nonresponsive proposal.
B. COMMUNICATION / CONTACT WITH CITY STAFF
Unless otherwise authorized herein, Proposers who are considering submitting a proposal in response to this RFP , or who submit a proposal in response to this RFP, are only to communicate with the assigned Project Coordinator(s), and no other City staff about this RFP from the date this RFP is issued until ais awarded. The City will provide all official communication concerning this RFP in writing via the City’s Bi d Management System, PlanetBids.
The City will not be responsible for or bound by any oral communication or any other information or contact that occurs outside the official communication process specified herein, unless confirmed in writing by the designated Project Manager(s).
C. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION OR CLARIFICATION / QUESTIONS Questions regarding this RFP shall be submitted via PlanetBids. Responses to all questions will be posted on PlanetBids no later than the date and time shown at the schedule of key RFP dates on the cover page of this RFP . All prospective Proposers are advised to visit PlanetBids on a regular basis as responses may be posted earlier than the date above (if applicable). No verbal requests or responses will be accepted. Significant interpretations or clarifications will be addressed via addenda to this RFP.
Significant interpretations or clarifications and responses to q uestions received by the deadline will be addressed via addenda to this RFP, which will be released and posted on PlanetBids under the “Addenda/Emails” tab.
D. EXCEPTIONS
Requests submitted for City’s consideration of proposed terms and conditions, including modifications to the City’s RFP and/or Agreement terms and conditions must be submitted by the deadline for questions. Such requests should include an attachment in Wor d or PDF format on formal company letterhead that shows the requested modifications. Should the Proposer be considered for award recommendation and progress into the negotiations phase, the requests for exceptions or modifications to the City’s terms and conditions will be discussed at that time. The City will not accept any requests after the deadline for questions and reserves the right to reject or strike any requests for exceptions or additional terms and conditions related to Agreement, RFP, and insura nce and indemnification terms and conditions.
E. ADDENDA
Any changes in RFP from the date of release to date of submittal will result in an addendum or amendment. Notification of such addendum or amendment shall be posted on City’s PlanetBids system, https://www.planetbids.com/portal/portal.cfm?CompanyID=20137.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Proposers shall be responsible for monitoring the site to obtain information regarding this solicitation.
F. UNDERSTANDING PROPOSAL
It is the responsibility of each Proposer to inquire about any criteria, condition, term, provision, or requirement of the RFP that the Proposer does not understand. Responses to inquiries, if they significantly change or clarify the RFP requirements or any aspect of the procurement process, will be forwarded by addenda to all Proposers. The City will not be bound by any oral responses to inquiries. By submitting proposals, Proposers assert that they have fully read the RFP and any addenda issued by the City, the proposed Agreement and any other Agreement Documents, and affirm that the terms and conditions stated therein are fully understood and are acceptable to the Proposer. Each Proposer accepts the terms and conditions of the Agreement Documents and indicates their ability and willingness to perform the requested services under such terms and conditions. Any exceptions to the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement Document shall be submitted to the City by the deadline to submit requests for information or clarification/questions set forth herein.
G. PROPOSAL CONTENTS
Proposals are to be prepared in such a way as to provide a straightforward, concise delineation of capabilities to satisfy the requirements of this RFP. Colored displays, promotional materials, photographs etc., are not necessary or desired. Emphasis should be concentrated on conformance to RFP instructions, responsiveness to the RFP requirements, and on completeness and clarity of content. Digital dividers and clear organization of content and material are encouraged.
1. Statement of Qualifications (SOQ)
SOQ must include a Table of Contents and be limited to a maximum of 20 pages (excluding City’s required Certifications listed in Section VIII below; Propo sal Cover Letter, section dividers, table of contents, resumes, front/back cover pages). The page limitation includes all appendices, attachments, and supplemental information.
Additionally, SOQ must include the following:
a. Cover Letter
Proposals shall include a letter signed by a principal or authorized representative who can make legally binding commitments for the entity. Include type of business entity.
Cover Letter shall not exceed one page.
Cover letter must be addressed to the following City Project Manager:
Alexandru Bangean, Senior Civil Engineer
City of Santa Ana – M-36
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
b. Services Provided
Proposal shall include a Scope of Services and Schedule which detail the work phase to be completed, the tasks to be accomplished, the deliverables to be provided, the schedule/timeline to complete the project, and how they meet the needs of the City as EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
described in Exhibit I – Scope of Services.
c. Agreement Statement
Proposal shall include a statement outlining your concurrence or reference to concerns previously submitted with any and all provisions as contained in EXHIBIT II – Sample Agreement of this RFP (if any).
d. Firm and Team Experience
Proposal shall include a profile of the firm’s experience including the following:
i. A general description of the firm, including size and number of employees working directly with the City on this agreement.
ii. Firm’s nearest address serving the City of Santa Ana and headquarters address.
iii. Name and contact information of the supervising Project Manager/Principal Agent, to be assigned to the agreement. The Project Manager/Principal Agent shall be the primary contact person to represent your firm and will be the person to conduct the presentation, if invited to an interview. iv. Resumes for all key staff proposed describing relevant experience.
e. Proposed Work Plan
Proposal shall include a statement demonstrating the firm’s understanding of the Scope of Services.
Additionally, proposed work plan shall include Proposers’:
i. Anticipated approach to performing services as specified herein; ii. Suggestions or special co ncerns the evaluation committee should take into consideration (if any);
iii. Description of deliverables and implementation plan. Proposer shall submit a general description of the deliverables, implementation plan, and timeline. f. References References shall be submitted for similar projects performed for state and/or similar government clients.
g. CARB Fleet Compliance
The City is a Public Works Awarding Body, as defined under Title 13 California Code of Regulations section 2449(c)(46). Accordingly, Proposers must submit, with their Proposals, valid Certificates of Reported Compliance (“CRC”) for the Proposer’s fleet and for the fleet(s) of its listed subcontractors (including any applicable leased equipment or vehicles). Proposer must additionally complete an d submit the Fleet Compliance Certification, included herein as ATTACHMENT J. Failure to provide a CRC for the Proposer, and for all listed subcontractors, or failure to complete the Fleet Compliance Certification, may render the Proposal non-responsive.
2. Cost Proposal
All Proposers are required to submit a fixed rate fee with their Cost Proposal. Pricing instructions should be clearly defined to ensure fees proposed can be compared and EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
evaluated. Cost Proposal must include a payment schedule if applicable. City reserves the right to negotiate compensation and/or payment schedule prior to award of any resulting agreement.
If providing hourly rate sheets, Proposer shall not include rate ranges or averages.
The fee proposal shall be submitted separately a nd concurrently with the technical proposal, electronically in PlanetBids, and as a hard copy in a separately sealed enveloped, clearly labeled as “Fee Proposal.” This shall include the firm’s Standard Hourly Fee Schedule, a table outlining the tasks and t eam hourly effort for each of the major tasks, and a Project Fee Schedule, as outlined in the Scope of Work.
The City shall not provide reimbursement for travel-related expenses, mileage, parking, lodging, meals, incidental fees, insurance, freight/shipping and handling/delivery, and any other business expenses, supplies and materials related to providing services as specified herein. Additional costs will not be considered and will not be reimbursed by the City, therefore, such costs must be absorbed in Proposer’s cost proposal fee structure.
Any language related to travel reimbursement shall be stricken from the document by the City and if not stricken, shall be deemed invalid.
Proposals shall be valid for a minimum of one hundred eighty (180) days following Proposal deadline. The cost for developing the Proposal is the sole responsibility of the Proposer. All Proposals submitted become property of the City.
Pricing shall remain firm for the entire initial Agreement term. Thereafter, any proposed pricing adjustment for follow -on renewal periods shall be submitted to the City Representative in writing at least ninety (90) days prior to the new Agreement term. The City reserves the right to accept, reject, or negotiate any proposed pricing adjustment not to exceed the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index (CPI) data as follows:
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA; All Urban Consumers; Not Seasonally Adjusted; annualized change comparing the most recent month’s reported data to the same month of the prior year. (This information may be found on the U.S. Department of Labor’s website at www.bls.gov.)
H. PROTEST PROCEDURES
Only respondents who have actually submitted a proposal may file a “protest” to an RFP with the City’s Purchasing Department. In order for a Proposer’s protest to be considered valid, the protest must:
1. Be filed in writing before 5:00 p.m. of the 5th business day following the posting of RFP Results/Notice of Intent to Award on the City’s online bidding system;
2. Clearly identify the specific irregularity or accusation;
3. Clearly identify the specific City staff determination or recommendation being protested;
4. Specify, in detail, the grounds of the protest and the facts supporting the protest; and
5. Include all relevant, supporting documentation with the protest at time of filing.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
If the protest does not comply with each of these requirements, it will be rejected as invalid. If the protest is valid, the City’s Purchasing Manager, or other designated City staff member, shall review the basis of the protest and all relevant information. The decision from the Purchasing Manager, or her/her designee, is final and no further appeals will be considered.
VI. CERTIFICATIONS (ATTACHMENTS)
In addition to the SOQ, Narrative/Technical Proposal, and Cost Proposal, t he following forms, included in this RFP, shall be signed and included as part of the proposal submittal package:
Attachment A: Proposer’s Certification and Proposal Item Pricing Attachment B: Proposer’s Statement
Attachment C: Non-Collusion Affidavit
Attachment D: Non-Lobbying Certification
Attachment E: Non-Discrimination Certification
Attachment F: Subcontractor Designation Form
Attachment G: CARB Fleet Compliance Certification
Attachment H: Statement Regarding CWA Requirements
Attachment I: Sam.gov UEI Verification
Attachment J: Certification Regarding Debarment,
Suspension, Inegibility and Voluntary Exclusion
Attachment K: Federal Funding Requirements
The proposal must be completely responsive to the RFP. Incomplete proposals will be deemed as nonresponsive and will be rejected. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted and no representation is made hereby that any commitment will be awarded pursuant to this RFP or otherwise.
PLEASE NOTE:
All forms above must be signed by a representative of the Firm that is legally authorized to contractually bind the Proposer.
City will not waive notarization requirement when applicable on any of the required attachments.
VII. REFERENCES
Contractor shall provide three (3) references from other similar public agencies for which services similar to those specified in this RFP have been performed, including contact names and telephone numbers. Use ATTACHMENT B – References. The respondent grants permission for the City to contact any individuals listed as references.
City may disqualify a Proposer if:
References fail to substantiate Proposer’s description of services and deliverables provided; or
References fail to support that Proposer has a continuing pattern of providing capable, productive, and skilled personnel, or
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
City is unable to reach the point of contact with reasonable effort. It is the Proposer’s responsibility to inform the point of contact(s) of normal City working hours.
VIII. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
See Exhibit II – Sample Agreement
IX. SELECTION PROCEDURES & CRITERIA
A. The City will establish a proposal review committee. The review committee will evaluate proposals based on the response to the RFP, which includes adherence to outlined directions and format, and the City evaluation criteria set forth below.
B. Proposers will be ranked by the review committee based on the following criteria:
C. Rankings: A final score will be calculated for each submitted proposal and used to rank Proposers. Based upon the foregoing criteria, all proposals shall be ranked by score. Only those proposals receiving a score above 70 will be considered for award. The City reserves the right to award the Agreement to any proposer(s) with a score above 70. The review committee will evaluate proposers based on their response to the RFP and the City evaluation criteria set forth above.
D. Interviews: The review committee may invite the Proposers to interview. If invited to interview, Proposers must be prepared to include key personnel in the interview and/or presentation.
The City reserves the right to seek additional information from any or all Proposers invited to present proposals. A final score will be calculated for each submitted pro posal and used to rank Proposers. City reserves the right to begin negotiations and enter into a n Agreement without holding interviews, or further discussions.
CATEGORY POINTS
Firm Experience 25
Team Experience 25
Relevant Project Experience 30
Schedule of Delivery 15
References 5
TOTAL POSSIBLE SCORE
(Before interviews – if held) 100
Interviews
The City reserves the right to conduct interviews with the highest-rated firm(s). In the event the City does perform an interview process, the following is the maximum number of additive points that may be applied to the proposal score.
20 EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
E. Selection: The City is under no obligation to accept any proposal and reserves the right to negotiate with respondents as to fees and terms. The City may reject proposals at its sole discretion. If proposal fails to satisfy any requirements outlined in this RF P, it m ay be considered non-responsive and may be rejected.
The City shall not be obligated to accept the lowest priced proposals, but will make awards in the best interests of the City after all factors have been evaluated. The review committee will recommend t he qualified Proposers to the City Council or City Manager for award of Agreement, as appropriate.
X. WITHDRAWALS
Proposers are responsible for verifying all prices and information before submitting a proposal.
Prior to the proposal due date, the Proposer or Proposer’s representative may withdraw the proposal by providing written notice of the proposal withdrawal to the City Contact/Project Manager. Verbal or telephonic withdrawals are not permissible.
XI. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
A. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
The awarded Contractor hereby certifies that it will comply, as applicable, with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 USC §§ 12101 et seq., and its implementing regulations, including Subtitle A, Title II of the ADA. Contractor will not discriminate against persons with disabilities nor against persons due to their relationship to or association with a person with a disability. Any Agreement entered into by the awarded Contractor (or any subcontract thereof), relating to this RFP, shall be subject to the provisions of this paragraph.
B. CITY BUSINESS LICENSE
The selected Proposer must obtain a City of Santa Ana Business License prior to the execution of an Agreement and must provide a copy to the Buyer assigned to this RFP. The awarded party shall maintain a current business license throughout the term of the resulting Agreement. Procedure to obtain a City of Santa Ana Business License is available by contacting the Finance and Management Services Agency, Business Tax Office at (714) 647- 5447 or on the City’s website: www.santa-ana.org
C. CITY RIGHT TO REJECT
The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted and no representation is made hereby that any agreement will be awarded pursuant to this RFP or otherwise. The City reserves the right to accept or reject the combined or separate compone nts of this proposal in part or in its entirety or to waive any minor inconsistency, informality or technical defect in the proposal.
D. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Contractor shall exercise reasonable care and diligence to prevent any actions or conditions that could result in a conflict with the best interests of the City. This obligation shall apply to the Contractor; the Contractor’s employees, agents, and Subcontractors associated with accomplishing work and services hereunder. The Contractor’s efforts shall i nclude, but not be limited to, establishing precautions to prevent its employees, agents, and Subcontractors from providing or offering gifts, entertainment, payments, loans or other considerations which could be deemed to influence or appear to influence City staff or elected officers from acting in the best interests of the City.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Each Proposer must disclose any existing or potential conflict of interest relative to the performance of the contractual services resulting from this RFP. Any such relationship that might be perceived or represented as a conflict should be disclosed. The City reserves the right to disqualify any Proposer on the grounds of actual or apparent conflict of interest.
No person, firm, or subsidiary thereof who has been awarded this Agreement may be awarded an Agreement for the provision of services, the delivery of supplies, or the provision of any other related action which is required, suggested, or otherwise deemed appropriate as an end product of this Agreement. Therefore, Contractor is precluded from contracting for any work recommended as a result of this Agreement.
E. CONTRACTOR’S EXPENSE
Pre-Contractual Expenses: The City is not liable for any costs incurred by Proposers prior to entering into a formal Agreement. Costs of developing a response to this RFP, are entirely the responsibility of the Proposer, and shall not be reimbursed in any manner by the City.
Pre-contractual expenses are not to be included in the cost proposal. Pre -contractual expenses include, but are not limited to, preparation of the proposal, submission of the proposal and additional information, attendance at pre-proposal conference, negotiating any matter related to this RFP with City, and/or any other expenses incurred by the Proposer prior to the date of award and execution, if any, of the Agreement.
Other Expenses: The Contractor will be responsible for all costs related to photo copying, telephone communications, fax communications, overhead, travel, and parking while on City sites during the performance of work and services under this Agreement.
F. CONTRACTOR’S PROJECT MANAGER/KEY PERSONNEL
Except as formally approved by the City, the key personnel identified in Contractor’s proposal shall be the indi viduals who will actually complete the work. Changes in staffing must be reported in writing and approved by the City. The City shall have the right to require the removal and replacement of the Contractor’s Project Manager and key personnel under the awarded Agreement. The City shall notify the Contractor in writing of such action. The City is not required to provide any reason, rationale, or additional factual information if it elects to request any specific key personnel be removed from performing services under the awarded Agreement. The City shall review and approve the appointment of the replacement for the Contractor’s personnel. Said approval shall not be unreasonably withheld.
Standards of Conduct: Contractor’s personnel shall be courteous and maintain good working relationships with all stakeholders, state or outside agencies, community members, other team members and staff within the City.
G. COST PROPOSAL
The awarded Contractor agrees to provide the purchased services at the costs, rates, and fees as set forth in their Fee Schedule in response to this RFP. No other costs, rates or fees shall be payable to the awarded Subcontractor for implementation of their proposal.
H. DATA RETENTION
Contractor shall be responsible for retaining data, records, and documentation for the preparation of required items. These materials shall be made available to and as requested by City.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
All materials, documents, data or information obtained from the City Data file s or any City medium furnished to Contractor in the performance of an awarded Agreement will at all times remain the property of the City. Such data or information may not be used or copied for direct or indirect use by Contractor after completion or termi nation of this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. All materials, documents, data or information, including copies, must be returned to the City at the end of the Agreement.
All data, documents and other products used, developed, o r produced during response preparation of the RFP will become property of the City. All responses to the RFP shall become property of the City. Proposer information identified as proprietary shall be maintained confidential, to the extent allowed under the California Public Records Act.
I. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
The awarded Contractor certifies compliance with Government Code Section 8355 in matters relating to providing a drug -free workplace. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under the Agreement or termination of the Agreement or both, and the Contractor may be ineligible for award of any future City Agreements.
J. EXAMINATION
Proposer represents that it has thoroughly examined and become familiar with the services and responsibilities required by this RFP and that it is capable of effectively and efficiently performing quality work to achieve the City’s objectives. Any attachments referenced herein or any interpretations, clarifications or amendments subsequently posted in relation to this RFP are fully incorporated.
Any irregularities or lack of clarity in the RFP should be brought to the designated City Contact/Project Manager’s attention as soon as possible so that corrective addenda may be furnished to prospective Proposers.
Proposals which appear unrealistic in the terms of technical commitments, lack of technical competence, or are indicative of failure to comprehend the complexity and risk of this Agreement, may be rejected.
K. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
Upon successful negotiations, the City and the selected Proposer wil l enter into an Agreement similar to that as shown in EXHIBIT II – Sample Agreement of this RFP. If a Proposer is unwilling or unable to execute an Agreement within thirty (30) days after being notified of selection under this RFP, the City reserves the right to disqualify them without any further obligation
L. FEDERAL GRANT CONTRACT PROVISIONS
Proposer must agree to the federal contract provisions outlined in the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requir ements for Federal Awards at 2 CFR Part 200.326. These provisions will become part of the agreement resulting from this bid.
M. FISCAL NONFUNDING CLAUSE
In the event sufficient budgeted funds are not available for a new fiscal period, the City shall retain the right to notify the provider of such occurrence in writing at least thirty (30) days before the end of the current fiscal period and terminate the Agreement on the last day of the current fiscal period without penalty or expense to the City. The City’s fiscal period is July 1st through June 30th.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
N. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
Contractor is considered an independent Contractor and neither Contractor, its employees, nor anyone working under Contractor will be considered an agent or an employee of City.
Neither Contractor, its employees, nor anyone working under Contractor, will qualify for workers’ compensation or other fringe benefits of any kind through City.
O. JOINT OFFERS/SUBCONSULTANTS
Where two or more Proposers desire to submit a single proposal in response to this RFP, they should do so on a prime sub-consultant basis. The City intends to contract with a single firm, also known as the prime, and not with multiple firms doing business as a joint venture.
Should the use of sub -consultants be offered, the Proposer shall provide the same assurances of competence for the sub -consultant plus the demonstrated ability to manage and supervise the subcontracted work. Sub -consultants shall not be allowed to further subcontract with others for work under the Agreement. The provisions of the Agreement shall apply to all sub-consultants in the same manner as the Proposer. The proposer is responsible for all the actions taken by their sub-contractor.
The City reserves the right to reject, replace and approve any and all Subcontractors. All Subcontractor(s) shall be identified in the response to the RFP and the City reserves the right to reject any proposed Subcontractor(s). Subcontractors shall be the responsibility of the prime Contractor and the City shall assume no liability of such Subcontractors.
P. LITIGATION STATUS
Each Proposer must include in its proposal a complete disclosure of any alleged significant prior or ongoing contract failures, any civil or criminal litigation or investigation pending which involves the Proposer or in which the Proposer has been judged guilty or liable. Failure to comply with the terms of this provision will disqualify any proposal. The City reserves the right to reject any proposal based upon the Proposer’s prior history with the City or with any other party, which documents, without limitation, unsatisfactory performance, adversarial or contentious demeanor, significant failure(s) to meet contract milestones or other contractual failures.
Q. NEGOTIATIONS
The City reserves the right to negotiate final Agreement terms with any Proposer selected.
The Agreement between the parties will consist of the RFP together with any modifications thereto, and the awarded Contracto r’s proposal, together with any modifications and clarifications thereto that are submitted at the request of the City during the evaluation and negotiation process. In the event of any conflict or contradiction between or among these documents, the docume nts shall control in the following order of precedence: the final executed Agreement, the RFP, any modifications and clarifications to the awarded Contractor’s proposal, and the awarded Contractor’s proposal. Specific exceptions to this general rule may be noted in the final executed Agreement.
Negotiations shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure to competing Contractors unless and until an agreement is reached. If contract negotiations cannot b e concluded successfully, the City reserves the right to negotiate a contract with another Contractor or withdraw the RFP.
R. NON-PAYMENTS
Note that payments will NOT be made for any unsatisfactory work until corrected. In the event of nonpayment of undisputed sums by the City, Contractor shall give the City thirty (30) working days to cure the alleged breach.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
S. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
The City has permanent ownership of all directly connected and derivative materials produced under this Agreement by th e Contractor. All documents, reports and other incidental or derivative work or materials furnished hereunder shall become and remains the sole property of the City and may be used by the City as it may require without additional cost to the City.
Contractor shall provide the City copies of documents upon its request at any time. None of the documents, reports and other incidental or derivative work or furnished materials shall be used by the Contractor without the express written consent of the City.
T. PARKING
The City will not provide free parking and/or reimbursement for the cost of parking while providing services and conducting business with the City.
U. PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
Contractor staff shall be courteous to the public and City staff utilizing facilities where Contractor is performing work, but shall be responsive only to the requests of the City’s Project Manager or designee. Contractor staff shall direct all inquiries to Project Manager or designee.
Contractor acknowledges that City locations consist of public-use facilities and recognizes the obligation to ensure Contractor personnel and agents maintain the highest level of professional standards in attire, decorum, and interaction with the public and City personnel.
V. PROJECT MANAGER
The selected Proposer will assume responsibility for all services in its proposal. The selected Proposer shall identify a sole point of contact, Project Manager, with the greatest knowledge in regard to the required service operations and contractual mat ters, including payment of any and all charges resulting from the Agreement.
W. PROPOSAL VALIDITY
Services, pricing, and warranties indicated in a Proposer’s Proposal must be valid for a period of 180 days at minimum after the submission of the Proposal.
X. PUBLIC AGENCIES
Other public agencies, as defined by California Government Code Section 6500, may choose to use the terms of this Agreement, subject to Contractor’s acceptance. The City is not liable or responsible for any obligations related to a subsequent Agreement between Contractor and another public agency.
Y. PUBLIC RECORDS
Proposals will become public record after the award of an Agreement unless the proposal or specific parts of the proposal can be shown to be exempt by law. Each Proposer may clearly label all or part of a proposal as "CONFIDENTIAL" provided that the Proposer thereby agrees to indemnify and defend the City for honoring such a designation. The failure to so label any information that is released by the City shall constitute a complete waiver of any and all claims for damages caused by any release of the information. Proposer information identified as proprietary shall be maintained confidential, to the extent allowed under the California Public Records Act.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Z. SUBCONTRACTORS
Proposals in response to this RFP must identify any Subcontractors, and outline the contractual relationship between the Awarded Subcontractor and each Subcontractor. An official of each proposed Subcontract or must sign, and include as part of the proposal submitted by the Prime Contractor, a statement to the effect that the Subcontractor has read and will agree to abide by the awarded Contractor’s obligations. Any Subcontractor proposed after award of Agreement must be approved by the City before commencement of work.
The City will look solely to the awarded Contractor for the performance of all contractual obligations which may result from an award based on this RFP, and the awarded Contractor shall not be relieved for the non-performance of any or all Subcontractors.
XII. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS A. PREVAILING WAGE
The Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California has ascertained the prevailing rate of per diem wages in dollars, based on a working day of eight hours, for each craft or type of worker or mechanic needed to execute any co nstruction or maintenance contract, which may be awarded by Public Works. The current prevailing wage rates as adopted by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations are incorporated herein by reference and may be accessed at http://www.dir.ca.gov/ (General Prevailing Wage determination made by the Director of Industrial Relations / Pursuant to California Labor Code Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 1770, 1773 and 1773.1).
Contractor is required to pay the prevailing wage rate referred to above and is responsible for selecting the craft/classification of workers which will be required to perform this service in accordance with the Contractor's method of performing the work. Pursuant to Section 1775 of the Labor Code (State of California) Contractor shall forfeit $50 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker paid less than the stipulated prevailing wage rates for any public work done under this Contract or by any subcontractor.
Prevailing Wage Compliance and Monitoring
Contractor is aware of the requirements of the California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), whi ch require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirement on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. Since the services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by Prevailing Wage Laws and since the total compensations is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Contractor with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement/Contact. Contact shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Contractor’s principal place of business and at the job site. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.
B. DIR REGISTRATION
This project is a public work and subject to the following: No contractor or subcontractor may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project (submitted on or after March 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5 EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
[with limited exceptions from this requirement for bid purposes only under Labor Code section 1771.1(a)]. No contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project (awarded on or after April 1, 2015) unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. Contractors are further cautioned that certified payrolls shall be submitted electronically directly to the Department of Industrial Relations.
C. CAL-OSHA VEHICLE REGULATION
All vehicles must meet California Motor Vehicle and C al-OSHA regulations and all other applicable codes required for vehicle use on the roads or highways in the state of California.
D. CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION
Contractor shall comply, and shall ensure all subcontractors comply, with all applicable requirements of the most current version of the regulations imposed by California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) including, without limitation, all applicable terms of Title 13, California Code of Regulations Division 3, Chapter 9 and all pending amendments (“Regulation”).
Throughout the Project, and for three (3) years thereafter, Contractor shall make available for inspection and copying any and all documents or information associated with Contractor’s and its subcontractors’ fleets including, without limitation, the Certificates of Reported Compliance (“CRCs”), fuel/refueling records, maintenance records, emissions records, and any other information the Contractor is required to produce, keep or maintain pursuant to the Regulation upon two (2) calendar days’ notice from the City.
Contractor shall be solely liable for any and all costs associated with compliance with the Regulation as well as for any and all penalties, fines, damages, or costs associated with any and all violations, or failures to comply with the Regulation. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officials, officers, employees and authorized volunteers free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Regulation.
E. QUALITY ASSURANCE
Contractor shall provide laborers and supervisors who are thoroughly familiar with the type of construction involved and materials and techniques specified.
F. COMMUNITY WORFORCE AGREEMENT
For projects with bids greater than $750,000 for prime multi -trade construction contracts (including all subcontractors) or over $100,000 for specialty contracts (contracts either limited to a single trade or craft or limited to a singular scope of work) , the CONTRACTOR sh all adhere to the CITY’S Community Workforce Agreement (CWA). This project is considered a specialty contract. The CWA is a pre -hire collective bargaining agreement, which establishes the labor relations policies and procedures for CONTRACTOR to follow in the crafts persons employed to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT as more fully described in the CWA. The CWA is incorporated by reference in the Construction Contract.
A copy of the CWA may be found in EXHIBIT IV.
G. CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Contractor shall keep work areas clean and free from any debris, rubbish, hazardous waste and non-usable material resulting from the work under this Contract and shall be disposed of at the completion of each work day by the Contractor. Hazardous waste must be disposed of in accordance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and all other applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations.
H. CHEMICALS
Handling and delivery of all materials must comply with all local, State, and Federal safety regulations and must maintain appropriate hazardous material transportation and handling certifications and licensing as applicable.
I. SAFETY PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
Work Site Safety shall be as defined by the Standard Specifications and these special provisions:
Contractor shall be solely responsible for ensuring that all work performed under the contract is performed in strict compliance with all applicable Federal, State and local occupational safety regulations. Consultant/Contractor shall provide at its expense all safeguards, safety devices and protective equipment, and shall take any and all actions appropriate to providing a safe Project site.
The following is required in addition to the requirements of the Standard Specification:
a. Contractor shall train all employees, or subcontractor personnel in the work practices necessary to safely perform his or her job. b. Contractor shall identify all known potential hazards related to the work performed and train all employees and subcontractor personnel on how to handle the potential hazards.
c. Contractor, their employees and subcontractors shall follow all safety rules and safe work practices.
d. Contractor will immediately notify the City of any significant and/or unusual hazards found during the course of work.
e. Contractor shall submit copies of Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for all hazardous materials to be utilized on site in the performance of work. f. Contractor is solely responsible for the legal disposal of hazardous waste generated in the performance of their work.
Safety Indemnification: To the extent allowed by law, the Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all investigations, complaints, citations, liability, expense (including defense costs and legal fees), claims and/or causes of action for damages of any nature whatsoever, including but not limited to injury or death to employees of the Contractor, its subcontractors or City, attributable to any alleged act or omission of the Contractor or its subcontractors which is in violation of any Cal OSHA regulation. The obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless includes all investigations and proceedings associated with purported violations of Section 336.10 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations pertaining to multi -employer work sites. The City may deduct from any payment otherwise due the Contractor any costs incurred or anticipated to be incurred by the Agency, including legal fees and staff costs, associated with any investigation or enforcement proceedings brought by Cal OSHA arising out of the assigned work.
J. OTHER SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Contractor shall take all reasonable precautions, as directed by the City, or in the absence of such direction, in accordance with sound industrial practices, to safeguard and protect City property and adjacent property. Damages to properties caused by Contractor’s negligence shall be repaired at no cost (both labor and material) to the City.
Contractor is responsible for advising and ensuring compliance by Contractor’s employees with all applicable environmental and hazardous materials handling laws and regulations.
Contractor shall provide City a full report of damage to City property and/or equipment by Contractor’s employees. All damage reports shall be submitted to the Site Coordinator within twenty-four (24) hours of occurrence.
Contractor shall provide, erect, and maintain all warning devices (i.e., barricades, cones, etc.) as required or necessary to ensure the safety of the public, City, and Contractor’s employees.
K. SPILL LIABILITY
The City does not assume liability for spills or other releases of hazardous wastes which are caused by the negligence of the contractor once hazardous waste materials are in the possession of the contractor or transported off site.
L. RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTS
Contractor is required to provide upon request, detailed data and information required by the City. Information may include: generator EPA ID, contractor EPA ID, generator name, waste description, manifest number and line number, date waste shipped, d isposal and recycling facilities utilized, final disposal method utilized, quantity shipped (pounds), waste profile number, and any additional information requested.
All records and reports shall be available in electronic (including Excel, Word, and PDF Format) and hard copy format at all times during the term of the contract.
XIII. FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS
A. FEDERAL AID CONTRACT PROVISIONS
Proposers are advised that this project is federally funded and they shall comply with all federal requirements in the Agreement.
B. DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISES (DBE)
Proposers are advised, as required by federal law, that the City is implement ing DBE requirements for the project and has established a 4% DBE goal. To meet this requirement, proposer must comply with the DBE requirements set forth in the Agreement and Attachment 4 of this RFP.
Proposers shall particular attention to Exhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information and follow the instructions for submitting the proper DBE information including, but not limited to, Exhibit 10-O1: Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment and documenting adequate good faith efforts.
B. CALTRANS ATTACHMENTS
Attachment L includes the following forms for reference and submitting. The forms can be found at: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/forms/local-assistance-procedures- manual-forms.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Please reference Caltrans Local Assistance Procedure Manual, Consultant Selection, Chapter 10, for further instructions and guidelines pertaining to the completion of these forms:https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/local- assistance/documents/lapm/ch10.pdf
XIV. AWARD OF AGREEMENT
Selected Contractor(s) will be notified in writing. Any award is contingent upon the successful negotiation of final Agreement terms.
A. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
A standard agreement is included as EXHIBIT II Sample Agreement of this RFP. “Proposer” will hereinafter be referred to as “Consultant” or “Contractor” in standard agreement. The term of the agreement will begin after the agreement is fully executed, and all required bonds, insurance documents and contents of the payment informa tion packet have been received and approved.
XV. IMPLEMENTATION
A. KICK-OFF MEETINGS
The successful proposer will be required to meet with City staff prior to commencement of services or at any time as required by the City, to discuss and agree on operational i ssues including transition of services and scheduling.
B. NOTICE TO PROCEED
Prior to issuance of a formal Notice to Proceed (NTP), Consultants shall provide all required bonds, insurance documents, and contents of the Information Packet for review and approval by the City. “On -Call” contracts require the City Project Managers to request a project/task proposal from Consultants on an “as -needed” basis. Proposals will then be evaluated by City Staff and written NTPs will be issued accordingly per task order.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
CITY OF SANTA ANA
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
BRIDGE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (BPMP)
RFP NO. 25-081A
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
The City of Santa Ana requests proposals from qualified professional engineering consultants to prepare the plans, specifications, and engineer’s estimate (PS&E), and construction support services for the Bridge Preventive Maintenance Program maintenance work of eight (8) bridges.
The City in January 2016 prepared its Bridge Preventative Maintenance Program (BPMP) plan that identified 22 bridges. In 2020, the BPMP plan was reevaluated with 8 bridges as top priority and would be eligible for Federal High way Bridge Program funding to preserve their service life. A copy of the location map and BPMP plan are provided in Attachment 6.
SCOPE OF WORK
The City of Santa Ana is inviting proposals from experienced and responsive consultants (Consultant) to:
1. Review and field verify the applicability of the maintenance activities listed on the provided BPMP Plan and most recent Inspection Reports.
2. Field review and identify any and all other maintenance work necessary on these Bridges to bring them to current conformance with the Caltrans inspection criteria and standards.
3. Prepare construction-ready Plans, Specifications, and Cost Estimates for the eight (8) bridges.
4. Prepare and file the environmental documents for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA).
5. Obtain encroachment and regulatory permit(s) and pay the necessary fees with Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) and any regulatory agencies for access and/or construction work within their jurisdictions.
6. Provide bid administration services from bid advertisement to City Council construction contract award.
7. Assist City with construction administration support throughout construction.
8. Prepare As-built plans upon construction completion.
EXHIBIT I
SCOPE OF SERVICES
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
CONSULTANT SERVICES
The Consultant’s services shall include the following tasks:
Consultant is responsible for providing all design and engineering as required for all components within the project scope of work which includes, but is not limited to the preparation and submittal of the PS&E package through completion with the approval from City to release for construction. This includes but is not limited to survey, civil design, structural design, technical investigation and report (for soils analysis), etc.
Consultant will also be responsible for facilitating monthly virtual progress meetings with City Staff to obtain input and discuss any project related items as well as provide project schedule.
Consultant shall provide review sets in .pdf format.
Final plans shall be provided in AutoCAD or Microstation format, and .pdf format.
A. PROJECT COORDINATION. The Consultant shall be fully responsible for the overall management and coordination for the project, which may include, but is not limited to project development team meetings, liaison with affected agencies, and utility companies. Prepare progress report and schedule, securing permits for all field studies, construction access, and any other required permits from other agencies.
B. RECORDS RESEARCH. Research all information pertinent to the project including, but not limited to existing field condition, as -built plans and record drawings, right -of-way data and all future improvement plans adjacent to or affecting the project site. The selected Consultant shall identify all existing and proposed facilities within the projects limits and potential conflicts.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE. The Consultant shall prepare, distribute, and file any environmental noticing, documents, preparation of studies and technical reports for environmental clearances that may be needed for the project to meet state and federal funding. This includes, but is not limited to federal, state, and local regulations, policies and procedures as they pertain to CEQA, NEPA, PES form, environmental studies, environmental site assessment, and environmental reports.
D. REGULATORY PERMITS. The Consultant shall provide services to process regulatory permits if deem necessary for the project. The regulatory agency includes, but not limit to, US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Pre-Construction Notification, Regional Water Quality Control Board Water Quality Certification, and CA Department of Fish & Wildlife Streambed Alteration Agreement Certification.
E. PRELIMINARY DESIGN. The consultant shall organize a kick-off meeting with City staff to discuss the conceptual design plan, project goals and objectives, potential elements and issues, project schedule, review of existing information, and conduction of a site investigation.
F. SURVEY. On-the-ground field topographical survey work is to be determined by the Consultant (and/or the Consultant’s Subconsultant) if any existing horizontal and vertical features are needed for the project. It is the Consultant’s responsibility to provide only the survey necessary for the design of the project components identified within this RFP. Consultant shall identify in the proposal a detail list of features the survey would include. Design level survey and base mapping of the project site shall be prepared in US Customary English units by a California licensed Land Surveyor in EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
accordance with the City guidelines and in Microstation CONNECT Computer Aided design and Drafting (CADD) format. The horizontal datum shall be NAD 83 and the vertical datum shall be NAVD
88. G. WATER QUALITY. The Consultant shall coordinate with the City for the Low Impact Development (LID) requirements of the project and prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) if deemed required. Consultant shall provide BMPs with appropriate size based on treatment and peak flow rates, freight to job site and one year of maintenance to include units and cost in the engineer’s cost estimate. The selection of Best Management Practices (BMPs) will always be subject to site specific conditions and the Consultant will be required to perform the research into the site specific conditions (e.g. prior contamination, depth to groundwater, soil conditions, interfering utilities, etc.) that could preclude infiltration. The Consultant shall also perform the required soils and/or infiltration testing per the Technical Guidance Documents, as necessary to design the infiltration system assuming it is the selected LID approach.
Please find information and links to relevant documents and regulations at the following site:
http://ocwatersheds.com/documents/wqmp.
H. PUBLIC OUTREACH. None at this time. However, allow one outreach preparation and meeting for fee proposal purposes.
I. UTILITY COORDINATION. The Consultant shall be responsible for all utility coordination efforts, including but not limited to; coordination with Edison for any electrical service connections, and water service connections for irrigation and water fountains.
J. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES (PS&E)
o Development of Plans, Specifications and Estimate (PS&E):
a) All reports, plans, specifications and quantity calculations shall conform to criteria, policies, procedures and standards of the City. The Consultant shall use the boilerp late for cut sheets, specifications and estimates provided by the City. b) The plan development shall include three (3) milestone deliverables—30%, 60%, 90% (pre-final) and 100% (final). All plan sheets shall be prepared at a reasonable standard scale to be noted on plans. The necessary plans for each PS&E package shall include, but are not be limited to:
Task 1: Design Development (30% plans)
Design development will involve the schematic development of plans based on the approved conceptual design plan, which shall include but is not limited to survey, civil design, geotechnical investigation and report (for soils analysis), infiltration testing, architectural design, landscape architectural design, structural design, interior design, furniture selection, electrical engineering, mechanical and plumbing engineering, draft technical specifications and “opinion of estimated cost’.
Deliverables shall include a 30% set of plans, including site section studies, draft specification, “Opinion of Probable Cost”.
Task 2: Construction Documents (60% 90% and 100% plans) Construction Documents (CDs) shall include finalizing approved deliverables from the Design Development phase. This includes the provision of detailed engineering and construction drawings that will serve as the basis for both bidding and construction by a general contractor.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Deliverables shall include 60%, 90% and 100% plans, structura l calculations, final technical specifications, finalized “Opinion of Probable Cost”. 100% plans will go through a constructability review that could lead to comments and recommendations that should also be addressed and completed as part of this deliverable.
Plans: Plans shall include, but are not limited to the following:
Title Sheet
Civil Engineering
o Site Erosion Plan, if any
o Horizontal and Vertical Control Plan
o Site Utility Plan
Structural Engineering
o Structural Design and Detailing
Technical Specifications
Technical specifications for all components listed above shall be provided by Consultant, or their Sub - consultants, to the City in CSI (Construction Specifications Institute) format. Consultant shall coordinate language between the general and technical specifications to ensure conflicts are minimized. City Staff will provide the City Boiler Plate which together, will become the Project Manual.
Final Opinion of Probable Cost
Consultant shall provide updated opinion of probable construction cost which shall reflect finalized plans, materials, systems, details of construction, and known or anticipated changes in the bidding market relative to the project. Should project scope exceed available budget, project plans/specifications will be phased as appropriate.
Task 3: Bid Advertisement, Construction Administration, Record Drawings Bid Advertisement
Bidding procedures will be the responsibility of the City. While the PS&E construction package is advertising for bids, all questions concerning the intent shall be referred to the City for resolution. In the event that any item requiring interpretation in the drawings or specifications is discovered during the bidding period, said items shall be analyzed by the Consultant for decision by the City. Consultant shall provide support to the City during the Bidding phase by assisting with questions, requests for information/clarification, or conflicts arising out of the bidding process. Consultant shall also attend pre-bid meeting, if scheduled.
Construction Administration
Consultant shall provide support to the City during the Construction Administration phase by assisting with questions, requests for information/clarification, and/or reviewing submittals.
Consultant shall review and approve all submittals and shop plan drawings required to support the construction contract. Consultant shall complete shop drawings reviews within two (2) weeks of receipt. Contract Change Order reviews shall be completed within two (2) working days of receipt.
Consultant shall be available as requested by the City to resolve discrepancies in the contract documents. Consultant shall bring to the attention of the City any defects or deficiencies in the work by the construction contractor which the Consultant may observe. Consultant shall have no authority to issue instruction on behalf of the City, or to deputize another to do so.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Record Drawings / As-built Plans:
Upon construction completion, the City will submit field -marked prints to Consultant. Consultant shall incorporate all changes to the plans electronically with all necessary revision notations, signature, and submit to the City.
FEE PROPOSAL
In addition to Section IV.B.3 (Submittal Requirements: Fee Proposal) fee schedule shall be structured to correspond to the above mentioned tasks as follows:
Task 1: Design Development
Task 2: Construction Documents
Task 3: Bid Advertisement, Construction Administration, Record Drawings
Total Fee: _____________
Fee schedule for each task should include an hourly breakdown that corresponds to the task total and shall include all fees associated with encroachment/regulatory permits.
The city reserves the right to add or reduce some of the above tasks and duties as it sees fit. The consultant, serving as staff extension, shall remain sufficiently flexible to meet the needs of the City and of the project.
CITY RESPONSIBILITIES
The City will provide information in its possession relevant to the preparation of the required information in the RFP. The City will provide only the staff assistance and the documentation specifically in referred to herein.
Furnish scope of work and provide general direction as needed for the assigned project. Facilitate meeting space and coordination and City facilities. Follow City of Santa Ana Invoicing guidelines.
As-Built Plans (if available)
CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES
Consultant shall provide all required insurance as outlines in EXHIBIT II of this RFP.
PAYMENT AND INVOICING
Selected Consultant shall invoice the City based on time and material according to the City’s standard invoice template. Tasks and hours shall be clearly identified and all rates must match those included in the approved agreement.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
CITY OF SANTA ANA
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this day of , 20__ by and between ___________________________________________________________, (“Consultant”), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (“City”).
RECITALS
A. The City desires to retain a Consultant having special skill and knowledge in the field of:
B. Consultant represents that Consultant is able and willing to provide such services to the City.
C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting firm in the field.
NOW THEREFORE , in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall perform during the term of this Agreement, the tasks and obligations including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required to fully and adequately complete the services described and set forth in Scope of Services - Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
2. COMPENSATION
a. City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services for City, the rates and charges identified in Compensation - Exhibit B. The total amount to be expended during the term of this Agreement shall not exceed $xxxxxx.
b. Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals which may reasonably be expected by City.
3. TERM
This Agreement shall commence on [ enter a Start Date or “the date first written above” ] for a number (#) year term with the option for the City to grant up to a number (#)-year renewals, exercisable by a writing by the City Manager and the City Attorney, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 15, below.
4. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent Consultant and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer - employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement;
EXHIBIT II
SAMPLE AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consist ent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes.
5. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS
This Agreement creates a non -exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”).
Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non -exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontract or prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Co nsultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk.
6. INSURANCE
Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the Contractor, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.
MINIMUM SCOPE OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply s eparately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 05 09 or 25 04 05 09) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
2. Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Contractor has no owned autos, covering hired, (Code 8) and non -owned autos (Code 9), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Workers’ Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): Insurance appropriate to the Contractor’s profession, with limit no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate.
If the contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the contractor.
Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
Additional Insured Status
The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provid ed in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used).
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Primary Coverage
For any claims related to this contract, the Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its o fficers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notic e to the City.
Waiver of Subrogation
Contractor hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Contractor may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.
Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured r etentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Contractor to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City.
Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
Claims Made Policies
If any of the required policies provide claims-made coverage:
1. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.
2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.
3. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work.
Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to requir e complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.
Special Risks or Circumstances
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nat ure of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
7. INDEMNIFICATION
Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and represen tatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Contractor, its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on its behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City , including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Contractor’s services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful mi sconduct of the Contractor.
8. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION
Consultant shall defend and indemnify the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States’ letters patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in the work product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement.
9. RECORDS
Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the wo rk to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement.
10. CONFIDENTIALITY
If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. “Confidential Information” shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly a vailable sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City.
11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE
Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement.
12. NON-DISCRIMINATION
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations.
13. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT
This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Contractor, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Contractor. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City.
Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein.
14. ASSIGNMENT
Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Contractor, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Ag reement shall be construed to limit the City’s ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other Contractors retained by City.
15. TERMINATION
This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions:
a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product(s) completed as of such date, and in such case such work produc t shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate.
b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement.
16. WAIVER
No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies.
17. JURISDICTION - VENUE
This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement.
18. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement.
19. NOTICE
Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or cer tified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons:
To City:
Clerk of the City Council
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988
Fax: 714- 647-6956
With courtesy copies to:
Executive Director, Public Works Agency
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-36)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, California 92702
Fax:
To Contractor:
A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty -four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded.
20. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney’s fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. The Agreement is the final and complete agreement and any pri or or contemporaneous First & Last Name
Title
Consultant Firm Name
Address
City, State, Zip
Fax:
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
agreements for similar services between the parties is superseded by this Agreement. This shall not apply where the Parties are currently engaged and Consultant is providing services not contemplated by this Agreement.
c. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written.
ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA
Jennifer L. Hall Alvaro Nuñez
City Clerk City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SONIA R. CARVALHO CONSULTANT:
City Attorney
By:
Assistant City Attorney
Tax ID#
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
Executive Director
Public Works Agency
SAMPLE ONLY
(name)
(title)
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Federal Regulations – Recipient must comply with the government cost principles, uniform administrative requirements and audit requirements for federal grant program housed within Title 2, Part 200 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
b. Debarment and Suspension – As required by Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, and 2 CFR §200.212 and codified in 2 CFR Part 200, Recipient must provide protection against waste, fraud, and abuse by debarring or suspending those persons deemed irresponsible in their dealings with the Federal government.
c. Audit Records - With respect to all matters covered by this agreement all records shall be made available for audit and inspection by CITY, the grant agency and/or their duly authorized representatives for a period of three (3) years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report by the City of Santa Ana. For a period of three years after final delivery hereunder or until all claims related to this Agreement are finally settled, whichever is later, Recipient shall preserve and maintain all documents, papers and records relevant to the services provided in accordance with this Agreement, including the Attachments hereto. For the same time period, Recipient shall make said documents, papers and records available to City and the ag ency from which City received grant funds or their duly authorized representative(s), for examination, copying, or mechanical reproduction on or off the premises of Recipient, upon request during usual working hours.
d. Reports - Recipient shall provide to City all records and information requested by City for inclusion in quarterly reports and such other reports or records as City may be required to provide to the agency from which City received grant funds or other persons or agencies.
e. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Handicapped) - All recipients of federal funds must comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (The Act). Therefore, the federal funds recipient pursuant to the requirements of The Act hereby gives assurance that no otherwise qualified handicapped person shall, solely by reason of handicap be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of or be subject to discrimination, including discrimination in employment, in any program or activity that receives or benefits from federal financial assistance. The Recipient agrees it will ensure that requirements of The Act shall be included in the agreements with and be binding on all of its contractors, subcontractors, assignees or successors.
f. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 - (ADA) Recipient must comply with all requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as applicable.
g. Political Activity - None of the funds, materials, property, or services provided directly or indirectly under this agreement shall be used for any partisan political activity, or to further the election or defeat of any candidate for public office, or otherwise in violation of the provisions of the "Hatch Act".
h. No Lobbying - Recipient will comply with all applicable lobbying prohibitions and laws, including those found in the Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C. 1352, et seq.), and agrees that none of the funds provided under this award may be expended by the Recipient to pay any person to influence, or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer
EXHIBIT III
FEDERAL REGULATIONS
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with any federal action concerning the award or renewal of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
i. Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity - Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1964, as amended; Subtitle A, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (1990); Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended; Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972, as amended; Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970, as amended; Section 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912, as amended; Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended; Department of Justice Non-Discrimination Regulations, 28 CFR Part 42, Subparts C, D, E, and G; and Department of Justice regulations on disability discrimination, 28 CFR Part 35 and 39. In the event a Federal or State court, Federal or State administrative agency, or the Recipient makes a finding of discrimination after a due process hearing on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or disability against a recipient of funds, the Recipient will forward a copy of the findings to CITY which will, in turn, submit the findings to the Office of Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. If applicable, recipient will comply with the equal opportunity clause in 41 C.F.R. 60 -1.4(b) in accordance with Executive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Order No. 11375.
j. Equal Employment Opportunity - Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, entitled “Equal Employment Opportunity,” as amended by Executive Order 11375 of October 13, 1967, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR chapter 60), as applicable.
k. Public Contracts Code - Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the California Public Contract Code Section 10295.3, as applicable.
l. Copeland Anti -Kickback Act - Recipient will comply, and all its contractors and subcontractors (or subrecipients) shall comply, with all requirements of the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (30 U.S.C. 3145) as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3), as applicable.
(1) Contractor – Contractors shall comply with 18 U.S.C. § 874, 40 U.S.C. § 3145, and the requirements of 29 C.F.R. pt. 3 as may be applicable, which are incorporated by reference into this contract.
(2) Subcontracts – Contractor or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clause above and such other clauses as FEMA may by appropriate instructions req uire, and also a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The prime contractor shall be responsible for the compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with all of these contract clauses.
(3) Breach – A breach of the contract clauses above may be grounds for termination of the contract, and for debarment as a contractor and subcontractor as provided in 29 C.F.R. § 5.12.
m. Davis-Bacon Act - Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Davis -Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141 -3144 and 3146 -3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5), as applicable.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Contractors are required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate no less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor.
Additionally, contractors are required to pay wages not less than once a week.
n. Work Hours and Safety - Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of Sections 103 and 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5), as applicable.
o. Clean Air Act - Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all applicable standards, orders or requirements issued under the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q), and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251-1387), as applicable.
p. Energy and Conservation - Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6201), as applicable.
q. Waste Disposal - Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as applicable.
r. Patent Rights - Recipient agrees that the Department of Homeland Security shall have the authority to seek patent rights for any process, product, invention or discovery developed and paid for with funding through this Agreement based on the requiremen ts of 37 CFR§ 401 and any other implementing regulations, as applicable.
s. Copyright - Recipient may copyright any books, publications or other copyrightable materials developed in the course of or under this Agreement. However, the federal awarding a gency, State Administrative Agency (SAA) and City reserve a royalty-free, non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, for federal government, SAA and/or City purpose:
(1) the copyright in any work developed through this Agreement; and
(2) any rights of copyright to which the subcontractor purchases ownership with support through this grant. The Federal government’s, SAA’s and City’s rights identified above must be conveyed to the publisher and the language of the publisher’s release form must ensure the preservation of these rights.
t. Telecommunications (2 CFR 200.216) - Recipient will comply with FEMA Policy 405-143- 1, Prohibitions on Expending FEMA Award Funds on Covered Telecommunication Equ ipment or Services (Interim), which prohibits grant recipients and subrecipients from obligating or expending loan or grant funds to procure or obtain, extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain, or to enter into a contract (or extend or renew a contract) to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system.
As described in Public Law 115-232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment is:
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
(1) Telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities).
(2) For the purpose of public safety, security of government facilities, physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities).
(3) Telecommunications or video surveillance services provided by such entities or using such equipment.
(4) Telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonably believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country.
u. Domestic preferences for procurements (2 CFR 200.322) - Recipient agrees that as appropriate and to the extent consistent with law, it will, to the greatest extent practicable under a Federal award, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). This requirement must be included in all subawards including all contracts and purchase orders for work or products under this award. For purposes of this provision: “produced in the United States” means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States; and “manufactured products” means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non -ferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, including optical fiber; and lumber.
v. Equal Employment in Construction Contracts - Pursuant to Equal Employment Opportunity requirements of 41 C.F.R. 60-1.4(b) in accordance with Executive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Order No. 11375, as to any construction contract thereunder, if applicable, during the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows:
(1) The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applic ant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following:
Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
(2) The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.
(3) The contractor will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or appl icant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other emplo yees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the contractor's legal duty to furnish information.
(4) The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the contractor's commitments under this sec tion, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.
(5) The contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor.
(6) The contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will per mit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders.
(7) In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with t he nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.
(8) The contractor will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The co ntractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
For projects with bids greater than $750,000 for prime multi -trade construction contracts (including all subcontractors) or over $100,000 for specialty contracts (contracts either limited to a single trade or craft or limited to a singular scope of work) , the CONTRACTOR shall adhere to the CITY’S Community Workforce Agreement (CWA). This project is considered a specialty contract. The CWA is a pre -hire collective bargaining agreement, which establishes the labor relations policies and procedures for CONTRACTOR to follow in the crafts persons employed to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT as more fully described in the CWA. The CWA is incorporated by reference in the Construction Contract. A copy of the CWA may be on the City’s website at www.santa-ana.org/documents/community-workforce- agreement/.
FOR PROPOSERS’ REFERENCE ONLY
EXHIBIT IV
COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA)
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
PLEASE SEE BELOW
EXHIBIT V
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORTS
EXHIBIT 2
California Department of Transportation
Division of Maintenance
Structure Maintenance and Investigations
BRIDGE
INSPECTION
RECORDS
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS.
These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual.
Records for “Confidential” bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0055/AAAK/102827Page of1 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 9 Routine-Roadway View (02/13/2019) Routine-Elevation View (02/13/2019) Routine-Underside View (02/13/2019)
PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
0.2 MI N/O ROUTE 5 FWYLOCATION
TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo
FACILITY CARRIED MAIN ST
No.
REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo
FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL
BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
33°46'14.94"LATITUDE
Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer)
INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah
N N/A (NBI)CULVERT
7 GOODDECK
7 GOODSUBSTRUCTURE
7 GOODSUPERSTRUCTURE 92.4SUFFICIENCY RATING
STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
1,942
PAINT CONDITION N/A
STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIASTRUCTURE EVALUATION
117°52'01.99"LONGITUDE
5 STABLE W/IN FOOTING OR PILSCOUR
INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) 150000000ON
POSTMILE 0
ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM ROUTE ON NHS
(9)
(11)
(16)
(17)
(7)
(6)
(5)
(104)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(62)
(67) (113)
Routine Inspection
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Edwin
Mah
03/31/2025
CIVIL
27141
9/11/2023
Date
Exp.
BRIDGE NO.:
55C0055
STRUCTURE NAME:
SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL February 7, 2023
INSPECTION DATE:
DECK AREA (M) 2
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0055/AAAK/102827Page of2 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 9 Five span continuous CIP RC "T" beam (12 each) supported by RC pier walls and open end RC diaphragm abutments on unknown foundation (original construction) and spread footing.
Widening from both sides. Four span continuous CIP RC "T" beam (2 each) supported by RC pier walls and open end RC diaphragm abutments, all on steel piles.
Original: (S) 5 @ 40.0 feet (N).
1st widening.: (S) 48.9 feet, 3 @ 40.0 feet, 48.9 feet (N). 2nd Wid.: (S) 64.0 feet, 2 @ 40.0 feet, 48.9 feet (N).
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
SPAN CONFIGURATION
(55)ORANGE
12 (69000) SANTA ANA
BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER
BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE
COUNTY CODE
HIGHWAY DISTRICT
STATE NAME
PLACE CODE
% SHARE
AGENCY INFORMATION
CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
YEAR BUILT
YEAR MODIFIED
LENGTH (M)
JOINTS
1918
SKEW
NO. OF HINGES
1975
61.9 0
00 MAIN SPANS
APPR SPANS 0
5 LOAD CAPACITY
DESIGN LOAD
INVENTORY RATING
OPERATING RATING
CALC METHOD
CALC METHOD
2 M 13.5 (H 15)
RF=1.46 =>47.3 metric tons
RF=2.43 =>78.7 metric tons
1 LF LOAD FACTOR
1 LF LOAD FACTOR
PERMIT RATING
POSTING LOADS
Legal
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Legal
Legal
PPPPP
MAX SPAN (M) 19.5
99.99 MUnimpaired
MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE STR FLARE 0-NO
NBIS BR LENGTH Y
STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 2: CONCRETE CONT
DESIGN TYPE MAIN 04: TEE BEAM
STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE
BRIDGE POSTING
STRUCTURE STATUS
0.0 M(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT
0.0 M(55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY
0.00 M(54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
N-NOT H/RR
N-NOT H/RR
INSPECTION INFORMATION
CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE
MO A)N-NONSTM INSP
MON-NOOTHER SPECIAL INSP C)
MON-NOUNDERWATER INSP B)
INSPECTION DATE (91) FREQUENCY MO02/23 48
MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
Safe
Loads
N/A
N/A
N/A
Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
Posting
Signs
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
35Speed N/A N/A MPH
Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements
Additional Signs
Load Rating Summary Date
Load Rating Type
04/05/2013
CALIFORNIA 069
N/AN/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Posting Date N/A
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(21)
(22)
(98)
(99)
(90)
(92)
A)
B)
C)
(27)
(106)
(34)
(49)
(112)
(45)
(46)
(48)
(35)
(43a)
(43b)
(44a)
(44b)
(31)
(66)
(64)
(41)
(65)
(63)
(70)
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
OVERLAY THICKNESS 3 inches
Load Rating Tool - Date BDS - 07/23/80
Calculated
N/A
STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
NONE
NONE
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0055/AAAK/102827Page of3 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 9 SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure.
Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder and. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge.
There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure. The channel is dry. The pedestrian access under the bridge to span 1 is from southwest quadrant and the vehicular parking is at the northwest quadrant.
No access to span 5, the easterly side CLF has an opening from the north end and homeless were living underneath.
No access to the southerly half of The area under span 1 (Abutment 1) was fenced and locked. Transients have been camping underneath span 5 (Abutment 6) even though this area was fenced with Chain Link Fence but it was cut by homeless.
DECK AND ROADWAY
Bridge deck has an Asphalt Overlay about 3.0 inches thick with cracks.
There is about 1.0 inch settlement at the northeast corner of the sidewalk.
Westerly sidewalk has map cracks at (0.04 inches wide and 12.0 inches in spacing) with delamination inside the exterior face.
The westerly concrete rail has an unsound concrete area at (15.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W) in span 2 at 10.0 feet south of pier wall 2.
The following is the locations of Span 2 with soffit cracks and spalls:
Bays 3 to 9, deck soffit have several transverse cracks with white and brown efflorescence.
Bay 4, deck soffit has three spalls at (6.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with exposed and corroded rebars.
Bay 6, deck soffit has a spall at (6.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with exposed and corroded rebars.
Bay 8, deck soffit has a spall (6.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with exposed and corroded rebars just north of the intermediate diaphragm. In addition, Bay 9, deck soffit has 4 transverse cracks at (0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet long with white and brown efflorescence.
The following is the locations of Span 3 with soffit cracks and spalls:
Bay 3, deck soffit has numerous transverse cracks with brown efflorescence.
Bay 4, deck soffit has 04 spalls at (10.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch) due to the shallow of concrete cover with exposed and rusted rebars.
Bay 5, deck soffit has 3 transverse cracks (up to 0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long) with white and brown efflorescence.
Bay 6, deck soffit has a transverse cracks (up to 0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long) with white and brown efflorescence; Bay 7, deck soffit has 2 transverse cracks (up to 0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long) with white and brown efflorescence.
Bay 8, deck soffit has two spalls at (10.0 inches L X 5.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with rebar exposed and rusted.
The following is the locations of Span 4 with soffit cracks and spalls:
Bays 3 to 9, deck soffit have several transverse cracks (up to 0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long) with white and brown efflorescence.
Bay 4, deck soffit has a spall at (10.0 inches L X 10.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with exposed rebars and corroded at the southerly end.
Bay 8, deck soffit has numerous small spalls (up to 1.5 inches round spalls) with exposed rebars due to the shallow of concrete cover.
Due to the shallow of concrete cover on deck soffit, there are a few areas with exposed rebars inside some of the bays as the following locations:
Span 1:
Bays 2, deck soffit has an unsound concrete area at (20.0 inches L X 16.0 inches W) about 17.0 feet from the southerly abutment.
Bay 8, deck soffit has an unsound concrete area at (12.0 inches L X 12.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) at the north end and it has a potentical of falling off at any time.
Bay 10, along the edge of the original overhang, deck soffit has two spalls at (16.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 4.0 inches D) about 10.0 and 17.0 feet from the southerly abutment.
INSPECTION COMMENTARY
CONDITION INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0055/AAAK/102827Page of4 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 9 UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS
The following is the locations of Span 2 with deck soffit spalls:
Bay 4, deck soffit has three spalls at (24.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with exposed rebars and corroded.
Bay 6, deck soffit hss a spall at (24.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 D) with exposed rebars and corroded.
Bay 8, deck soffit has a large spall at (24.0 inches L X 20.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with exposed rebars and corroded just north of the intermediate diaphragm.
The following is the locations of Span 3 with deck soffit spalls Bay 8, deck soffit has two spalls at (24.0 inches L X 10.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with exposed rebar and rusted.
Bay 4, deck soffit has 4 spalls at (20.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) due to the shallow of concrete cover with exposed rebars and rusted.
Span 4:
Bay 4, deck soffit has a spall at (20.0 inches L X 20.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with exposed rebar and corroded at the southerly end.
Bay 8, deck soffit has numerous small spalls with exposed rebars due to the shallow of concrete cover.
The work-recommendation has been made in 2007 for coring bridge deck to determine the condition of deck soffit. Deck soffit patching also included in the work-recommendation on 02/26/2007 but it is not done.
SUPERSTRUCTURE
There is a sign of abrasion on some of the concrete girders.
Girder 9 of span 2 has an unsound concrete area at (1.5 feet X 2.5 feet) at mid-span.
Girder 9 (easterly original girder) has one longitudinal crack at (0.05 inches wide, 2.0 feet long) at the bottom face; and 3.0 feet long longitudinal crack at 0.05 inches wide. Both cracks are at the midspan 1.
SUBSTRUCTURE
There are debris and trash under all bridge spans.
Pier wall 4 has a hole around the east nose at (3.0 feet D X 15.0 feet L X 3.0 feet W).
The pier walls have the following locations with vertical cracks below:
Pier wall 2 has two cracks about (0.05 inches wide and 5.0 feet long) right below girder 6 and between girders 7 and 8.
Pier wall 3 has only one crack about (0.05 inches wide and 4.0 feet long) right below girder 6.
Pier wall 4 has only one crack about (0.05 inches wide and 6.0 feet long) right below girder 6.
Pier wall 5 has one crack about (0.03 inches wide and 8.0 feet long) right below girder #7 and one crack at (0.05 inches wide) between girders 5 and 6.
Pier wall 4 has a segregation area at (3.0 feet X 10.0 feet) at the southerly face approximately 2.0 feet above the ground level.
SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
The load rating for this structure is calculated on 04/05/2014 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 04/05/2014.
INSPECTION COMMENTARY
- NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
CONDITION INFORMATION
SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0055/AAAK/102827Page of5 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 9 TYPE OF MEMBRANE
TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION
DECK STRUCTURE TYPE
TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE
WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM
37000AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
2019 YEAR OF ADT
2 KMBYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH
1 %(109) TRUCK ADT %
60054FUTURE ADT
2041 YEAR OF FUTURE ADT
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
6-BITUMINOUS
0-NONE
0-NONE
1-CIP CONCRETE
DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION
31.1 M
26.7 M
DECK AND ROADWAY
LANES 7
35 1-ROUTE ON NHS
PARALLEL STRUCTURE
TEMPORARY STRUCTURE
DEFENSE HIGHWAY
FUNCTIONAL CLASS
SPEED
NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
TOLL
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK
TYPE OF SERVICE
FEDERAL LANDS HWY
8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRITAPPR ROADWAY ALIGN
4 TOLERABLEDECK GEOMETRY
26.7 MAPPROACH RDWY WIDTH
BRIDGE MEDIAN
LEFT 1.8 M RIGHT 1.8 MCURB OR SIDEWALK
TOTAL WIDTH
NET WIDTH
26.7 MINVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR
99.99 MINVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR
3-ON FREE ROAD
14-OTHER PRIN ART URBAN
0-NOT STRAHNET
N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
0-NOT APPLICABLE
0-NOT ON NET
0 NO MEDIAN
5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATIONDECK GEOMETRY
(W) 1.0 foot br, 6.0 feet sw, 87.6 feet, 6.0 feet sw, 1.0 foot br (E).
DECK CROSS SECTION
000000000000LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 1-PART OF NET
3 inchesOVERLAY THICKNESS (inches)
N/A
(51)
(52)
(50)
(32)
(33)
(107)
(108)
A)
B)
C)
(29)
(30)
(19)
(114)
(115)
(37)
(42a)
(12)
(13)
(104)
(26)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(10)
(47)
(68)
(72)
(105)
(110)
(20)
(28a)
(103)
61.9 MLENGTH (49)
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition State
16 Top Flange-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 1925
20 200
sq.m
each
each
1705
0 0
200
0 200
20 20
0 0
0 0
DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Defect/
Prot
1080
1130
Defect
(16) Top Flange-RC
(16-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Deck soffit cracks and spalls.
Due to the shallow of concrete cover on deck soffit, there are a few areas with exposed rebars inside some of the bays as the following locations:
In span #1:
Bays #2, deck soffit has an unsound concrete area at (20.0 inches L X 16.0 inches W) about 17.0 feet from the southerly abutment.
Bay #8, deck soffit has an unsound concrete area at (12.0 inches L X 12.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) at the north end and it has a potentical of falling off at any time.
Bay #10, along the edge of the original overhang, deck soffit has two spalls at (16.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 4.0 inches D) about
10.0 and 17.0 feet from the southerly abutment.
The following is the locations of Span #2 with deck soffit spalls:
Bay #4, deck soffit has three spalls at (24.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with exposed rebars and corroded.
Bay #6, deck soffit hss a spall at (24.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 D) with exposed rebars and corroded.
Bay #8, deck soffit has a large spall at (24.0 inches L X 20.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with exposed rebars and corroded just north of the intermediate diaphragm.
The following is the locations of Span #3 with deck soffit spalls Bay #8, deck soffit has two spalls at (24.0 inches L X 10.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with exposed rebar and rusted. (58) 7DECK RATING =
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0055/AAAK/102827Page of6 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 9 Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition State
DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Defect/
Prot Defect
(16-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(16-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Bay #4, deck soffit has 4 spalls at (20.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) due to the shallow of concrete cover with exposed rebars and rusted.
Span #4:
Bay #4, deck soffit has a spall at (20.0 inches L X 20.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with exposed rebar and corroded at the southerly end.
Bay #8, deck soffit has numerous small spalls with exposed rebars due to the shallow of concrete cover.
The following is the loctions of span #1 with soffit cracks:
Bays #3 to #9, deck soffit ha numerous transverse cracks with white and brown efflorescence; The following is the locations of Span #2 with soffit cracks and spalls:
Bays #3 to #9, , soffit have several transverse cracks with light white and brown efflorescence.
Bay #4, deck soffit has three spalls at (6.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with rebar exposed and corroded; Bay #6, deck soffit has a spall at (6.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with rebar exposed and corroded.
Bay #8, deck soffit has a spall (6.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with rebar exposed and corroded just north of the intermediate diaphragm. In addition, Bay #9, deck soffit has 4 transverse cracks at (0.04 inches wide, 1.0 to 3.0 feet long with white and brown efflorescence.
The following is the locations of Span #3 with soffit cracks and spalls:
Bay #3, deck soffit has numerous transverse cracks with brown efflorescence; Bay #4, deck soffit has 04 spalls at (10.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W X 1.0 inch) due to the concrete cover with exposed rebars and rusted.
Bay #5, deck soffit has 3 transverse cracks with white and brown efflorescence.
Bay #6, deck soffit has a transverse cracks with white and brown efflorescence; Bay #7, deck soffit has 2 transverse cracks with white and brown efflorescence.
Bay #8, deck soffit has two spalls at (10.0 inches L X 5.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with rebar exposed and rusted.
The following is the locations of Span #4 with soffit cracks and spalls:
Bays #3 to #9, deck soffit have several transverse cracks with white and brown efflorescence.
Bay #4, deck soffit has a spall at (10.0 inches L X 10.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) with exposed rebars and corroded at the southerly end.
Bay #8, deck soffit has numerous small spalls with exposed rebars due to the concrete cover. (58) 7DECK RATING =
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0055/AAAK/102827Page of7 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 9 Photo 1 Photo 1
AC Roadway at both of approach and departure lanes
DECK PHOTOGRAPHS
DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES (58) 7DECK RATING = (36a) Rail Code 001 0
331 Railing-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 124
1 5
m
each
each
118
0 0
6 1
5 0
0 0
0 0
0 JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES 1080
1130
RAIL INFORMATION
(36b) Transition (36c) Appr Guardrail (36d) Appr Guardrail End 35Roadway Speed MPH
JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(331) Railing-RC
(331-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(331-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Map cracks and numerous small spalls inside the exterior of concrete bridge railings.
The westerly concrete rail has an unsound concrete area at (15.0 inches L X 4.0 inches W) in span #2 at 10.0 feet south of pier wall #2.
There is about 1.0 inch settlement at the northeast corner of the sidewalk.
Westerly sidewalk has map cracks at (0.04 inches wide, 12.0 inches in spacing) with minor delamination inside the exterior face.
Photo 1
Metal Bridge Guard Railing at northeast corner was hit by cars Photo 1
Metal Bridge Guard Railing at northeast corner was hit by cars
JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL PHOTOGRAPHS
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0055/AAAK/102827Page of8 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 9 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
Natural earth trapezoidal.
TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER
N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI)UNDERCLEARANCES V - H
9 ABOVE DESIRABLEWATER ADEQUACY
MVERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR
NAVIGATION CONTROL
0.0 MNAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
0.0 MNAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
PIER PROTECTION
N: NOT APPLICABLE5-WATERWAY
5 STABLE W/IN FOOTING OR PILESCOUR
N/ASCOUR POA DATE
CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 PROTECTED
N/A
(42b)
(69)
(71)
(61)
(113)
(38)
(111)
(39)
(116)
(40)
110 Girder/Beam-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 713
3 1
m
each
each
709
0 0
4 3
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
1080
1130
210
215
225
Pier Wall-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
Abrasion (PS Conc./RC)
Abutment-RC
Pile-Steel
2 2
2 2
2 115
5 1
62 1
m
each
each
m
ea.
109
0 0
62 1
6 5
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 0
0 0
0 1130
1190
SUPERSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE
SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING =(59) 7
SUBSTRUCTURE RATING =(60) 7
(110) Girder/Beam-RC
(110-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(110-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(210) Pier Wall-RC
(210-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(210-1190) Abrasion (PS Conc./RC)
(215) Abutment-RC
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Cracks and abrasion.
The pier walls have the following locations with vertical cracks below:
Pier wall #2 has two cracks about (0.05 inches wide) right below girder #6 and between girders #7 and #8.
Pier wall #3 has only one crack about (0.05 inches wide) right below girder #6.
Pier wall #4 has only one crack about (0.05 inches wide) right below girder #6.
Pier wall #5 has one crack about (0.03 inches wide) right below girder #7 and one crack at (0.05 inches wide) between girders #5 and #6.
Pier wall #4 has a segregation area at (3.0 feet X 10.0 feet) at the southerly face approximately 2.0 feet above the ground level.
There were no significant defects noted.
Minor cracks and spalls.
There is a sign of abrasion on some of the concrete girders.
Girder #9 of span #2 has an unsound concrete area at (1.5 feet X 2.5 feet) at mid-span.
Girder #9 (easterly original girder) has one longitudinal crack at (0.05 inches wide, 2.0 feet long) at the bottom face; and 3.0 feet long longitudinal crack at 0.05 inches wide. Both cracks are at the midspan #1.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0055/AAAK/102827Page of9 9 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations
OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
Work By
Action
Est Cost Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY
Remove Vegetation
02/12/2019
Str Target ROUTINE
Remove all debris, trash underneath of the structure due to transients who have been camping here.
Dist Target
EA Status PROPOSED
DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Action
Est Cost Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY
Deck-Misc.
02/26/2007
Str Target ROUTINE
Since the soffit is so bad , so I recommend that the city should core several samples from the concrete deck to determine how much is the chloride content in the concrete deck.
Patch all the soffit spalls after cleaning the soffit rebars.
Dist Target
EA Status PROPOSED
227 Pile-RC 2 1 ea. 1 0 0
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 SUBSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE RATING =(60) 7
WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
(225) Pile-Steel
(227) Pile-RC
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element.
The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element.
EXHIBIT 2
55C0055
102 - Deck-Damage/Deterioration
May 09, 2023 [AAAK]
Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
55C0055
119 - Rail-Damage/Deterioration
May 09, 2023 [AAAK]
Metal Bridge Guard Railing at northeast corner was hit by cars Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
55C0055
119 - Rail-Damage/Deterioration
May 09, 2023 [AAAK]
Metal Bridge Guard Railing at northeast corner was hit by cars Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
55C0055
103 - Deck-Details
May 09, 2023 [AAAK]
AC Roadway at both of approach and departure lanes
Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0423/AAAL/102829Page of1 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 Routine-Roadway View (02/12/2019) Routine-Elevation View (02/12/2019) Routine-Underside View (02/02/2021)
PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
0.2 MI E/O FAIRVIEW STLOCATION
TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo
FACILITY CARRIED 17TH STREET
No.
REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo
FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL
BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
33°45'35.14"LATITUDE
Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer)
INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah
N N/A (NBI)CULVERT
7 GOODDECK
7 GOODSUBSTRUCTURE
7 GOODSUPERSTRUCTURE 93.9SUFFICIENCY RATING
STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
3,043
PAINT CONDITION N/A
STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIASTRUCTURE EVALUATION
117°54'04.06"LONGITUDE
8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTINGSCOUR
INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) 150000000ON
POSTMILE 0
ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM ROUTE ON NHS
(9)
(11)
(16)
(17)
(7)
(6)
(5)
(104)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(62)
(67) (113)
Routine Inspection
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Edwin
Mah
03/31/2025
CIVIL
27141
9/11/2023
Date
Exp.
BRIDGE NO.:
55C0423
STRUCTURE NAME:
SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL February 8, 2023
INSPECTION DATE:
DECK AREA (M) 2
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0423/AAAL/102829Page of2 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 Simply supported 4-span PC/PS concrete I-girder (13 each) with RC pier walls and RC open end seat abutments, all supported upon concrete piles.
(W) 87.0 feet, 2 @ 89.0 feet, 87.0 feet (E).
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
SPAN CONFIGURATION
(55)ORANGE
12 (69000) SANTA ANA
BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER
BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE
COUNTY CODE
HIGHWAY DISTRICT
STATE NAME
PLACE CODE
% SHARE
AGENCY INFORMATION
CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
N/A
YEAR BUILT
YEAR MODIFIED
LENGTH (M)
JOINTS
1977
SKEW
NO. OF HINGES
109.1
34 02
MAIN SPANS
APPR SPANS 0
4 LOAD CAPACITY
DESIGN LOAD
INVENTORY RATING
OPERATING RATING
CALC METHOD
CALC METHOD
0 UNKNOWN
RF= 1.61
RF= 2.22
8 LRFR RATING FACTOR
8 LRFR RATING FACTOR
PERMIT RATING
POSTING LOADS
Legal
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Legal
Legal
PPPPP
MAX SPAN (M) 27.1
99.99 MUnimpaired
MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE STR FLARE 0-NO
NBIS BR LENGTH Y
STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 6: PRSTR CONC CONT
DESIGN TYPE MAIN 02: STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM
STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE
BRIDGE POSTING
STRUCTURE STATUS
0.0 M(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT
0.0 M(55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY
0.00 M(54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
N-NOT H/RR
N-NOT H/RR
INSPECTION INFORMATION
CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE
MO A)N-NONSTM INSP
MON-NOOTHER SPECIAL INSP C)
MON-NOUNDERWATER INSP B)
INSPECTION DATE (91) FREQUENCY MO02/23 48
MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
Safe
Loads
N/A
N/A
N/A
Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
Posting
Signs
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
40Speed N/A N/A MPH
Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements
Additional Signs
Load Rating Summary Date
Load Rating Type
06/19/17
CALIFORNIA 069
N/AN/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Posting Date N/A
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(21)
(22)
(98)
(99)
(90)
(92)
A)
B)
C)
(27)
(106)
(34)
(49)
(112)
(45)
(46)
(48)
(35)
(43a)
(43b)
(44a)
(44b)
(31)
(66)
(64)
(41)
(65)
(63)
(70)
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches
Load Rating Tool - Date BrR 6.8.1 AASHTO - 06/19/17
Calculated
N/A
STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
NONE
NONE
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0423/AAAL/102829Page of3 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS
SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure.
Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge.
The channel is dry. There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure.
DECK AND ROADWAY
There are longitudinal and transverse deck cracks range from (up to 0.07 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet in spacing) throughout the entire bridge deck.
Deck soffit has random transverse cracks at (0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long) with white and brown efflorescence in most bays of span 1 near pierwall 2 and in between spans 2 and 3.
Both sidewalks have longitudinal cracks and numerous small spalls with exposed rebars along the bottom.
Type B seal has no adhesion; and it has been deterioratiing at aboth of abutment joints with vegetation inside the joint gap at (2.0 to 3.0 inches gap at 75.0 degrees of Fahrenheit.
SUPERSTRUCTURE
PC/PS Girders have cracks and spalls as the following locations below:
The southerly girder at the west end above the westerly abutment has a spall (16.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 6.0 inches D) with exposed rebar and rusted.
Girder 3 has a small spall (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 27.0 feet from the westerly abutment.
Span 2, girder 5 has a spall (24.0 inches L x 8.0 inches W x 5.0 inches D) with exposed rebars and strands with rusted at the bottom flange at midspan 2.
Span 4, girder 2 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 42.0 feet from pier wall 4. Girder 11 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) about 33.0 feet from pier wall 4. In addition, girder 13 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 4.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) about 30.0 feet from pier wall 4 and (2.0 inches L X 2.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) spall approximately 33.0 feet from pier wall 4.
The southerly exterior girder has a spall (12.0 inches L x 8.0 inches W x 1.0 inches D) on top of southwest corner of the westerly abutment.
Northerly, girder 2 has a spall (4.0 inches L x 4.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) over the bike lane approximately 60.0 west of abutment 5.
There are several girder webs covering with graffiti near the easterly abutment.
SUBSTRUCTURE
The following is the locations of cracks on pier walls below:
Pier wall 2 has four vertical cracks 0.05 inches wide.
Pier wall 3 has two vertical cracks 0.06 inches wide.
Pier wall 4 has four vertical 0.06 inches wide cracks; and three 0.06 inches wide vertical cracks.
North half of the westerly abutment and southerly half of the easterly abutment are occupied with transients.
The westerly abutment has a large spall at (20.0 inches L x 14.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) under the southerly girder, southwest corner.
RECOMMENDATION
Chaining deck and coring samples of this bridge are highly recommended due to the condition of bridge deck so that the local agency can determine the best solution of deck treatment with Methacrylate or Polyester Concrete Overlay.
SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
The load rating for this structure is calculated on 06/19/2017 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 06/19/2017.
INSPECTION COMMENTARY
- NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
CONDITION INFORMATION
SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0423/AAAL/102829Page of4 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 TYPE OF MEMBRANE
TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION
DECK STRUCTURE TYPE
TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE
WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM
33000AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
2021 YEAR OF ADT
2 KMBYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH
1 %(109) TRUCK ADT %
70777FUTURE ADT
2041 YEAR OF FUTURE ADT
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
1-CONCRETE
0-NONE
0-NONE
1-CIP CONCRETE
DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION
28.0 M
24.3 M
DECK AND ROADWAY
LANES 6
40 1-ROUTE ON NHS
PARALLEL STRUCTURE
TEMPORARY STRUCTURE
DEFENSE HIGHWAY
FUNCTIONAL CLASS
SPEED
NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
TOLL
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK
TYPE OF SERVICE
FEDERAL LANDS HWY
8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRITAPPR ROADWAY ALIGN
5 ABOVE TOLERABLEDECK GEOMETRY
24.3 MAPPROACH RDWY WIDTH
BRIDGE MEDIAN
LEFT 1.5 M RIGHT 1.5 MCURB OR SIDEWALK
TOTAL WIDTH
NET WIDTH
24.3 MINVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR
99.99 MINVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR
3-ON FREE ROAD
14-OTHER PRIN ART URBAN
0-NOT STRAHNET
N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
0-NOT APPLICABLE
0-NOT ON NET
0 NO MEDIAN
5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATIONDECK GEOMETRY
(N) 1.0 foot br, 5.0 feet sw, 78.0 feet, 5.0 feet sw, 1.0 foot br (S).
DECK CROSS SECTION
000000000000LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 1-PART OF NET
0 inchesOVERLAY THICKNESS (inches)
N/A
(51)
(52)
(50)
(32)
(33)
(107)
(108)
A)
B)
C)
(29)
(30)
(19)
(114)
(115)
(37)
(42a)
(12)
(13)
(104)
(26)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(10)
(47)
(68)
(72)
(105)
(110)
(20)
(28a)
(103)
109.1 MLENGTH (49)
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition State
12 Deck-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
3054
350
sq.m
each
2704
0 200
200
150
150
0 0
DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Defect/
Prot
1130
Defect
(12-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
There are longitudinal and transverse deck cracks range from (0.04 to 0.07 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet in spacing) throughout the entire deck.
Deck soffit has random transverse cracks at (0.04 inches wide) with white and brown efflorescence in most bays of span 1 near pierwall 2 and in between spans 2 and 3.
(58) 7DECK RATING =
(36a) Rail Code 001 0
302
333
Joint-Compression Seal
Seal Adhesion (Joints)
Railing-Other
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
2 2
2 2
66 30
220
30 m
each
m
each
36 0
190
0 25
25 30
30 5
5 0
0 0
0 0
0 JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES 2320
1080
RAIL INFORMATION
(36b) Transition (36c) Appr Guardrail (36d) Appr Guardrail End 40Roadway Speed MPH
JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(302-2320) Seal Adhesion (Joints)
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Type B seal has no adhesion; and it has been deterioratiing at aboth of abutment joints with vegetation inside the joint gap at (2.0 to 3.0 inches gap at 75.0 degrees of Fahrenheit.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0423/AAAL/102829Page of5 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
RC trapezoidal.
TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER
N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI)UNDERCLEARANCES V - H
9 ABOVE DESIRABLEWATER ADEQUACY
MVERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR
NAVIGATION CONTROL
0.0 MNAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
0.0 MNAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
PIER PROTECTION
N: NOT APPLICABLE5-WATERWAY
8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTINGSCOUR
N/ASCOUR POA DATE
CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 PROTECTED
N/A
(42b)
(69)
(71)
(61)
(113)
(38)
(111)
(39)
(116)
(40)
109
312
Girder/Beam-PS Conc.
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Bearing-Enclosed
2 2
2 1419
20 2
m
each
each
1399
0 2
15 15
0 5
5 0
0 0
0 SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
1080
210 Pier Wall-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
84 6
m
each
78 0
4 4
2 2
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 01130
SUPERSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE
SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING =(59) 7
SUBSTRUCTURE RATING =(60) 7
(109-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(312) Bearing-Enclosed
(210-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
PC/PS Girders have cracks and spalls as the following locations below:
The southerly girder at the west end above the westerly abutment has a spall (16.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 6.0 inches D) with exposed rebar and rusted.
Girder 3 has a small spall (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 27.0 feet from the westerly abutment.
Span 2, girder 5 has a spall (24.0 inches L x 8.0 inches W x 5.0 inches D) with exposed rebars and strands with rusted at the bottom flange at midspan 2.
Span 4, girder 2 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 42.0 feet from pier wall 4. Girder 11 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) about 33.0 feet from pier wall 4. In addition, girder 13 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 4.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) about 30.0 feet from pier wall 4 and (2.0 inches L X 2.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) spall approximately 33.0 feet from pier wall 4.
The southerly exterior girder has a spall (12.0 inches L x 8.0 inches W x 1.0 inches D) on top of southwest corner of the westerly abutment.
Northerly, girder 2 has a spall (4.0 inches L x 4.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) over the bike lane approximately 60.0 west of abutment 5.
There were no significant defects noted.
JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(333-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Both sidewalks have longitudinal cracks and numerous small spalls (1.0 to 2.0 inches round) with exposed rebars along the bottom.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0423/AAAL/102829Page of6 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 215
226
256
Abutment-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Pile-PS Conc.
Slope Protection
2 2
2 2
56 2
1 2
m
each
ea.
ea.
54 0
1 2
0 0
0 0
2 2
0 0
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 0
0 0
1080
SUBSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE RATING =(60) 7
(210-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(215-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(226) Pile-PS Conc.
(256) Slope Protection
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
The following is the locations of cracks on pier walls below:
Pier wall 2 has four vertical cracks 0.05 inches wide.
Pier wall 3 has two vertical cracks 0.06 inches wide.
Pier wall 4 has four vertical 0.06 inches wide cracks; and three 0.06 inches wide vertical cracks.
The westerly abutment has a large spall at (20.0 inches L x 14.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) under the southerly girder, southwest corner.
The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element.
There were no significant defects noted.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0423/AAAL/102829Page of7 7 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations
OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Work By
Work By
Action
Action
Action
Est Cost
Est Cost
Est Cost
Rec Date
Rec Date
Rec Date
LOCAL AGENCY
LOCAL AGENCY
LOCAL AGENCY
Sub-Patch spalls
Sub-Patch spalls
Sub-Patch spalls
02/01/2021
02/18/2015
02/27/2007
Str Target
Str Target
Str Target
ROUTINE
ROUTINE
ROUTINE
Sawcut, remove and clean all loose material; and then, patch it with cement mortar concrete as the following location below (this work recommendation has been made in 2007).
The westerly abutment has a large spall at (20.0 inches L x 14.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) under the southerly girder, southwest corner.
Clean rebars and patch the spall (20.0 inches L x 14.0 inches W x 12.0 inches D) at the westerly abutment.
Patch the west abutment that has a large spall (20.0 inches L x 14.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) under the southerly girder.
Dist Target
Dist Target
Dist Target
EA
EA
EA
Status
Status
Status
PROPOSED
PROPOSED
PROPOSED
Work By
Action
Est CostRec Date LOCAL AGENCY
Joints-Replace
02/12/2019
Str Target ROUTINE
Replace all the existing type B seal.
Dist Target
EA Status PROPOSED
Work By
Work By
Action
Action
Est Cost
Est Cost
Rec Date
Rec Date
LOCAL AGENCY
LOCAL AGENCY
Super-Patch spalls
Super-Patch spalls
02/01/2021
04/26/2011
Str Target
Str Target
ROUTINE
ROUTINE
Patch all concrete spalls as the following locations below. Some of the spall areas have been mentioned in the previous work recommendations in previous years.
The southerly girder at the west end above the westerly abutment has a spall (16.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 6.0 inches D) with exposed rebar and rusted.
Girder 3 has a small spall (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 27.0 feet from the westerly abutment.
Span 2, girder 5 has a spall (24.0 inches L x 8.0 inches W x 5.0 inches D) with exposed rebars and strands with rusted at the bottom flange at midspan 2.
Span 4, girder 2 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 42.0 feet from pier wall 4. Girder 11 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) about 33.0 feet from pier wall 4. In addition, girder 13 has a small spall (4.0 inches L x 4.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) about 30.0 feet from pier wall 4 and (2.0 inches L X 2.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) spall approximately 33.0 feet from pier wall 4.
The southerly exterior girder has a spall (12.0 inches L x 8.0 inches W x 1.0 inches D) on top of southwest corner of the westerly abutment.
Northerly, girder 2 has a spall (4.0 inches L x 4.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) over the bike lane approximately 60.0 west of abutment 5.
Clean all rebars and patch the spall at girder 5 in span 2 and others Dist Target
Dist Target
EA
EA
Status
Status
PROPOSED
PROPOSED
DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Action
Est Cost Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY
Deck-Methacrylate
02/12/2019
Str Target ROUTINE
Chaining deck and coring deck samples are highly recommended prior to seal deck cracks with Methacrylate throughout the entire deck.
Dist Target
EA Status PROPOSED
WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
EXHIBIT 2
California Department of Transportation
Division of Maintenance
Structure Maintenance and Investigations
BRIDGE
INSPECTION
RECORDS
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS.
These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual.
Records for “Confidential” bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0115/AAAM/102827Page of1 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Routine-Roadway View (02/13/2019) Routine-Elevation View (02/13/2019) Routine-Underside View (02/26/2015)
PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
0.3 MI S/O MEMORY LANELOCATION
TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo
FACILITY CARRIED BRISTOL ST
No.
REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo
FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL
BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
33°46'09.87"LATITUDE
Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer)
INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah
N N/A (NBI)CULVERT
5 FAIRDECK
7 GOODSUBSTRUCTURE
7 GOODSUPERSTRUCTURE 90.1SUFFICIENCY RATING
STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
944
PAINT CONDITION 100
STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIASTRUCTURE EVALUATION
117°53'04.89"LONGITUDE
5 STABLE W/IN FOOTING OR PILSCOUR
INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) 150000000ON
POSTMILE 0
ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM ROUTE ON NHS
(9)
(11)
(16)
(17)
(7)
(6)
(5)
(104)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(62)
(67) (113)
Routine Inspection
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Edwin
Mah
03/31/2025
CIVIL
27141
9/11/2023
Date
Exp.
BRIDGE NO.:
55C0115
STRUCTURE NAME:
SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL February 7, 2023
INSPECTION DATE:
DECK AREA (M) 2
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0115/AAAM/102827Page of2 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Simply supported 3-span steel girders (7 each at span 2 & and 6 each at spans 1 and 3) with RC pier walls and RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments, foundation type unknown.
West widening: Simply supported 3-span PC/PS concrete I-girders (5 each) with RC pier walls and with RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments, all supported upon driven Class 70C piles.
East widening: Simply supported 3-span PC/PS concrete I-girders (3 each) with RC pier walls and with RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments with monolithic wingwalls, all supported upon driven Class 70C piles. (S) 22.75 feet, 52.10 feet, 22.75 feet (N).
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
SPAN CONFIGURATION
(55)ORANGE
12 (69000) SANTA ANA
BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER
BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE
COUNTY CODE
HIGHWAY DISTRICT
STATE NAME
PLACE CODE
% SHARE
AGENCY INFORMATION
CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
YEAR BUILT
YEAR MODIFIED
LENGTH (M)
JOINTS
1947
SKEW
NO. OF HINGES
2003
31.1 5
04 MAIN SPANS
APPR SPANS 0
3 LOAD CAPACITY
DESIGN LOAD
INVENTORY RATING
OPERATING RATING
CALC METHOD
CALC METHOD
2 M 13.5 (H 15)
RF= 0.91
RF= 1.18
8 LRFR RATING FACTOR
8 LRFR RATING FACTOR
PERMIT RATING
POSTING LOADS
Legal
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Legal
Legal
PPPPP
MAX SPAN (M) 15.1
99.99 MUnimpaired
MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE STR FLARE 0-NO
NBIS BR LENGTH Y
STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 3: STEEL
DESIGN TYPE MAIN 02: STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM
STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE
BRIDGE POSTING
STRUCTURE STATUS
0.0 M(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT
0.0 M(55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY
0.00 M(54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
N-NOT H/RR
N-NOT H/RR
INSPECTION INFORMATION
CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE
MO A)N-NONSTM INSP
MON-NOOTHER SPECIAL INSP C)
MON-NOUNDERWATER INSP B)
INSPECTION DATE (91) FREQUENCY MO02/23 24
MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
Safe
Loads
N/A
N/A
N/A
Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
Posting
Signs
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
45Speed N/A N/A MPH
Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements
Additional Signs
Load Rating Summary Date
Load Rating Type
09/08/16
CALIFORNIA 069
N/AN/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Posting Date N/A
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(21)
(22)
(98)
(99)
(90)
(92)
A)
B)
C)
(27)
(106)
(34)
(49)
(112)
(45)
(46)
(48)
(35)
(43a)
(43b)
(44a)
(44b)
(31)
(66)
(64)
(41)
(65)
(63)
(70)
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches
Load Rating Tool - Date BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO - 09/08/16
Calculated
N/A
STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
NONE
NONE
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0115/AAAM/102827Page of3 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS
SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure.
Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder and median area. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge.
There is no need for special equipment to inspect this structure.
The channel is dry.
REVISIONS
The entire quantity of RC abutments ELI 215 is modified from 203.0 to 262.0 feet because the wingwalls are monolithic with the abutments.
DECK AND ROADWAY
AC roadway is at both approach and departure lanes.
Polyester Concrete Overlay was only done on lane 1 of each direction for areas of the original bridge deck and the center median approximately 45.0 feet wide and 100.0 feet long with Methacrylate treatment.
The widening bridge deck has longitudinal and transverse hairline cracks up to 0.05 inches and 1.0 to 3.0 feet long wide throughout the entire bridge deck.
There are transverse cracks up to 0.05 inches wide with heavy white and brown efflorescence inside the original bays 6 to 9 of all spans (see the attached photo no. 9).
Type A pourable seal has been deteriorating and losing all its adhesion.
SUPERSTRUCTURE
Only the bottom and the top flanges of all steel girders were painted in between span 2; and the painting system of superstructure is in fair condition but the webs need to be painted.
About 50.0% of the restrainer cables are rusted.
SUBSTRUCTURE
The northerly abutment has an incipient spall at (12.0 inches L x 5.0 inches W) at the top of bay 3 (counting from east, see the attached photo no. 6).
The northerly abutment has three vertical cracks from 0.05 to 0.07 inches wide and 4.0 to 10.0 feet long (see the attached photo no. 5).
Along all the footing of pier walls are placed and protected with rocks, boulders (riprap).
SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
The load rating for this structure is calculated on 09/08/2016 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 09/08/2016.
INSPECTION COMMENTARY
- NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
CONDITION INFORMATION
SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0115/AAAM/102827Page of4 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 TYPE OF MEMBRANE
TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION
DECK STRUCTURE TYPE
TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE
WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM
55000AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
2021 YEAR OF ADT
2 KMBYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH
1 %(109) TRUCK ADT %
81501FUTURE ADT
2041 YEAR OF FUTURE ADT
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
1-CONCRETE
0-NONE
0-NONE
1-CIP CONCRETE
DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION
30.5 M
25.7 M
DECK AND ROADWAY
LANES 4
45 1-ROUTE ON NHS
PARALLEL STRUCTURE
TEMPORARY STRUCTURE
DEFENSE HIGHWAY
FUNCTIONAL CLASS
SPEED
NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
TOLL
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK
TYPE OF SERVICE
FEDERAL LANDS HWY
8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRITAPPR ROADWAY ALIGN
9 ABOVE DESIRABLE CRITDECK GEOMETRY
25.7 MAPPROACH RDWY WIDTH
BRIDGE MEDIAN
LEFT 2.1 M RIGHT 2.1 MCURB OR SIDEWALK
TOTAL WIDTH
NET WIDTH
25.7 MINVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR
99.99 MINVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR
3-ON FREE ROAD
14-OTHER PRIN ART URBAN
0-NOT STRAHNET
N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
0-NOT APPLICABLE
0-NOT ON NET
0 NO MEDIAN
5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATIONDECK GEOMETRY
(W) 1.00 foot br, 7.00 feet sw, 72.00 feet, 7.00 feet sw, 1.00 foot br (E).
DECK CROSS SECTION
000000000000LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 1-PART OF NET
0 inchesOVERLAY THICKNESS (inches)
N/A
(51)
(52)
(50)
(32)
(33)
(107)
(108)
A)
B)
C)
(29)
(30)
(19)
(114)
(115)
(37)
(42a)
(12)
(13)
(104)
(26)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(10)
(47)
(68)
(72)
(105)
(110)
(20)
(28a)
(103)
31.1 MLENGTH (49)
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition State
12 Deck-RC
Efflorescence/Rust Staining
Cracking (RC and Other)
Concrete Coat.(Meth/Sealer)
2 2
2 2
948
150
75 426
sq.m
each
each
sq.m
723
0 0
426
150
100
50 0
75 50
25 0
0 0
0 0
DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Defect/
Prot
1120
1130
521
Defect
(12-1120) Efflorescence/Rust Staining
(12-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(12-521) Concrete Coat.(Meth/Sealer)
There are transverse hairline cracks up to 0.04 inches wide with light to heavy white; and brown efflorescence inside the original bays #6 to #9 of all spans (see the attached photo no. 9).
The widening deck has random longitudinal and transverse hairline cracks up to 0.06 inches wide throughout the entire bridge deck.
The Asphalt Slurry was placed over an area of the original bridge deck (two lanes #1 of each bound traffic and the center median approximately 45.0 feet wide, 100.0 feet long) with Methacrylate treatment. (58) 5DECK RATING =
(36a) Rail Code 001 0
301 Joint-Pourable Seal
Seal Adhesion (Joints)
Seal Damage (Joints)
2 2
2 86
25 30
m
each
each
31 0
0 25
25 0
30 0
30 0
0 0
JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES 2320
2330
RAIL INFORMATION
(36b) Transition (36c) Appr Guardrail (36d) Appr Guardrail End 45Roadway Speed MPH
JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0115/AAAM/102827Page of5 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
Natural earth trapezoidal with rock slopes through the site.
TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER
N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI)UNDERCLEARANCES V - H
9 ABOVE DESIRABLEWATER ADEQUACY
MVERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR
NAVIGATION CONTROL
0.0 MNAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
0.0 MNAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
PIER PROTECTION
N: NOT APPLICABLE5-WATERWAY
5 STABLE W/IN FOOTING OR PILESCOUR
N/ASCOUR POA DATE
CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 PROTECTED
N/A
(42b)
(69)
(71)
(61)
(113)
(38)
(111)
(39)
(116)
(40)
107
109
182
312
Girder/Beam-Steel
Steel Coating-Paint
Girder/Beam-PS Conc.
EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
Corrosion
Bearing-Enclosed
2 2
2 2
2 2
201
150
240
4 2
4 m
sq.m
m
ea.
each
each
201
150
240
3 1
4 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
515
1000
SUPERSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE
SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING =(59) 7
(107) Girder/Beam-Steel
(107-515) Steel Coating-Paint
(109) Girder/Beam-PS Conc.
(182) EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
(182-1000) Corrosion
(312) Bearing-Enclosed
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
There were no significant defects noted.
Only the bottom flange and the top flange of all steel girders were painted in between span #2. The paint system of the girders is in fair condition.
There were no significant defects noted.
Minor corrosion.
About 50.0 percent of the restrainer cables are rusted.
This element is included to indicate the presence of bearings on this structure. The bearings were not exposed for visual inspection.
No indication of bearing distress was noted in any superstructure element. 331 Railing-RC 2 60 m 60 0 0 0
JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(301) Joint-Pourable Seal
(301-2320) Seal Adhesion (Joints)
(301-2330) Seal Damage (Joints)
(331) Railing-RC
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
The pourable joint seals are located only at lane #2 from each direction (widening portion only) and they are deteriorated and cracked throughout.
The pourable joint seals are partially failed and lost adhesion, debris was noticed inside the joint.
The seal of the joints are failed in many locations.
There were no significant defects noted.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0115/AAAM/102827Page of6 6 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations
OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
Work By
Work By
Action
Action
Est Cost
Est Cost
Rec Date
Rec Date
LOCAL AGENCY
LOCAL AGENCY
Appr. Roadway-Repair
Joints-Replace
02/01/2021
02/20/2019
Str Target
Str Target
ROUTINE
ROUTINE
Repave AC roadway at the approach and departure lanes due to settlement behind abutment locations.
Replace all Type A seal at all locations on bridge deck.
Dist Target
Dist Target
EA
EA
Status
Status
PROPOSED
PROPOSED
Work By
Action
Est Cost Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY
Paint Misc. Activity
02/01/2021
Str Target ROUTINE
Full preparation to paint all steel girder webs those have been left out. In addition, remove and clean all rust from the EQ Restrainer Cables before paint them.
Dist Target
EA Status PROPOSED
DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Action
Est Cost Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY
Deck-Methacrylate
02/20/2019
Str Target ROUTINE
Seal deck cracks with Methacrylate only widening section on both directions (approximately 70.0% of bridge deck need to be sealed) .
Dist Target
EA Status PROPOSED
210
215
220
226
Pier Wall-RC
Abutment-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
Pile Cap/Footing-RC
Pile-PS Conc.
2 2
2 2
2 2
62 80
1 2
20 1
m
m
each
each
m
ea.
62 77
0 0
20 1
0 1
0 1
0 0
0 2
1 1
0 0
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 0
0 0
0 0
1080
1130
SUBSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE RATING =(60) 7
WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
(210) Pier Wall-RC
(215) Abutment-RC
(215-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(215-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(220) Pile Cap/Footing-RC
(226) Pile-PS Conc.
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
There were no significant defects noted.
Monolithic wingwalls are included in the total quantity. It has a spall, cracks.
The northerly abutment has an incipient spall at (12.0 inches L X 5.0 inches W) at the top of bay #3 (counting from east, see the attached photo no. 6).
The northerly abutment has three vertical cracks from 0.05 to 0.07 inches wide (see the attached photo no. 5).
There were no significant defects noted.
The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on:Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM
Page of1
55C0115/AAAL/65718
6 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Bridge Inspection Report
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
Bridge Number : 55C0115
0.3 MI S/O MEMORY LANE
02/01/2021
STRUCTURE NAME:
Location :
Inspection Date :
SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL
Inspection Type
Routine
X
CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
Year Built :
Year Modified:
Length (m) :
No. of Joints :
1947 Skew (degrees):
No. of Hinges :
2003
31.1 5
Structure Description:Simply supported 3-span steel girders (7 each at span 2 & and 6 each at spans 1 and 3) with RC pier walls and RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments, foundation type unknown.
West widening: Simply supported 3-span PC/PS concrete I-girders (5 each) with RC pier walls and with RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments, all supported upon driven Class 70C piles.
East widening: Simply supported 3-span PC/PS concrete I-girders (3 each) with RC pier walls and with RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments with monolithic wingwalls, all supported upon driven Class 70C piles.
Span Configuration :(S) 22.75 feet, 52.10 feet, 22.75 feet (N).
SAFE LOAD CAPACITY AND RATINGS
Design Live Load:
Inventory Rating:
Operating Rating:
Calculation Method:
Calculation Method:
M-13.5 OR H-15
RF= 0.91
RF= 1.18
(LRFR) LD & RES FACT RATING
(LRFR) LD & RES FACT RATING
Deck X-Section: (W) 1.00 foot br, 7.00 feet sw, 72.00 feet, 7.00 feet sw, 1.00 foot br (E).
Total Width: Net Width: No. of Lanes:
Rail Code:
Channel Description: Natural earth trapezoidal with rock slopes through the site. 4 30.5 25.7
0010
0 4
m m
Facility Carried: BRISTOL ST
SANTA ANACity :
Min. Vertical Clearance: Unimpaired
FC Underwater Special Other
SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure. Bridge deck was inspected by
INSPECTION COMMENTARY
Permit Rating :
Posting Load : LegalType 3: Type 3S2: Type 3-3:
DESCRIPTION ON STRUCTURE
LegalLegal
PPPPP
Speed: 45 mph
The bridge inspection condition assessment used for this inspection is based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Bridge Element Inspection Manual 2013 as defined in Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) federal law. The new element inspection methodology may result in changes to related condition and appraisal ratings on the bridge without significant physical changes at the bridge.
The element condition information contained in this report represents the current condition of the bridge based on the most recent routine and special inspections. Some of the notes presented below may be from an inspection that occurred prior to the date noted in this report. Refer to the Scope and Access section of this inspection report for a description of which portions of the bridge were inspected on this date.
NOTICE
DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
Overlay Thickness: 0.0 inches
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on:Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM
Page of2
55C0115/AAAL/65718
6 walking on shoulder and median area. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge.
There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure.
The channel is dry at the time of inspsection.
REVISIONS
The entire quantity of RC abutments ELI #215 is modified from 203.0 feet to 262.0 feet because the wingwalls are monolithic with the abutments.
DECK AND ROADWAY
AC roadway is at both approach and departure lanes.
Polyester Concrete Overlay was only done on lanes 1 of each direction for areas of the original bridge deck and the center median approximately 45.0 feet wide, 100.0 feet long with Methacrylate treatment.
The widening bridge deck has longitudinal and transverse hairline cracks up to 0.05 inches wide throughout the entire bridge deck.
There are transverse cracks up to 0.05 inches wide with heavy white and brown efflorescence inside the original bays 6 to 9 of all spans (see the attached photo no. 9).
Type A pourable seal has been deteriorating and losing all its adhesion.
SUPERSTRUCTURE
Only the bottom and the top flanges of all steel girders were painted in between span 2; and the painting system of superstructure is in fair condition but the webs need to be painted.
About 50.0 percent of the restrainer cables are rusted.
SUBSTRUCTURE
The northerly abutment has an incipient spall at (12.0 inches L x 5.0 inches W) at the top of bay 3 (counting from east, see the attached photo no. 6).
The northerly abutment has three vertical cracks from 0.05 to 0.07 inches wide (see the attached photo no. 5).
Along all the footing of pier walls are placed and protected with rocks, boulders / riprap.
SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
The load rating for this structure is calculated on 09/08/2016 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 09/08/2016.
INSPECTION COMMENTARY
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on:Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM
Page of3
55C0115/AAAL/65718
6 Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4
Qty in each Condition State
12 107
109
182
210
215
Deck-RC
Efflorescence/Rust Staining
Cracking (RC and Other)
Concrete Coat.(Meth/Paint/Seal)
Girder/Beam-Steel
Steel Coating-Paint
Girder/Beam-PS Conc.
EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
Corrosion
Pier Wall-RC
Abutment-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 948
150
75 426
201
150
240
4 2
62 80
1 2
sq.m
each
each
sq.m
m
sq.m
m
ea.
each
m
m
each
each
723
0 0
426
201
150
240
3 1
62 77
0 0
150
100
50 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
1 0
1 75
50 25
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND COMMENTARY
Defect
/Prot
1120
1130
521
515
1000
1080
1130
Defect
(12-1120)
There are transverse hairline cracks up to 0.04 inches wide with light to heavy white; and brown efflorescence inside the original bays #6 to #9 of all spans (see the attached photo no. 9). (12-1130)
The widening deck has random longitudinal and transverse hairline cracks up to 0.06 inches wide throughout the entire bridge deck.
(12-521)
The Asphalt Slurry was placed over an area of the original bridge deck (two lanes #1 of each bound traffic and the center median approximately 45.0 feet wide, 100.0 feet long) with Methacrylate treatment.
(107)
There were no significant defects noted.
(107-515)
Only the bottom flange and the top flange of all steel girders were painted in between span #2. The paint system of the girders is in fair condition.
(109)
There were no significant defects noted.
(182)
Minor corrosion.
(182-1000)
About 50.0 percent of the restrainer cables are rusted. (210)
There were no significant defects noted.
(215)
Monolithic wingwalls are included in the total quantity. It has a spall, cracks. (215-1080)
The northerly abutment has an incipient spall at (12.0 inches L X 5.0 inches W) at the top of bay #3 (counting from east, see the attached photo no. 6).
(215-1130)
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on:Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM
Page of4
55C0115/AAAL/65718
6 WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By:
Work By:
Work By:
Action :
Action :
Action :
EstCost:
EstCost:
EstCost:
RecDate:
RecDate:
RecDate:
LOCAL AGENCY
LOCAL AGENCY
LOCAL AGENCY
Appr. Roadway-Repair
Paint Misc. Activity
Deck-Methacrylate
02/01/2021
02/01/2021
02/20/2019
StrTarget:
StrTarget:
StrTarget:
2 YEARS
2 YEARS
2 YEARS
Repave AC roadway at the approach and
departure lanes due to settlement behind
abutment locations.
Full preparation to paint all steel
girder webs those have been left out. In
addition, remove and clean all rust from
the EQ Restrainer Cables before paint
them.
Seal deck cracks with Methacrylate only
widening section on both directions
(approximately 70.0% of bridge deck need
to be sealed) .
DistTarget:
DistTarget:
DistTarget:
EA:
EA:
EA:
Status :
Status :
Status :
PROPOSED
PROPOSED
PROPOSED
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4
Qty in each Condition State
220
226
301
312
331
Pile Cap/Footing-RC
Pile-PS Conc.
Joint-Pourable Seal
Seal Adhesion (Joints)
Seal Damage (Joints)
Bearing-Enclosed
Railing-RC
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 20
1 86
25 30
4 60
m
ea.
m
each
each
each
m
20 1
31 0
0 4
60 0
0 25
25 0
0 0
0 0
30 0
30 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND COMMENTARY
Defect
/Prot
2320
2330
Defect
The northerly abutment has three vertical cracks from 0.05 to 0.07 inches wide (see the attached photo no. 5).
(220)
There were no significant defects noted.
(226)
The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. (301)
The pourable joint seals are located only at lane #2 from each direction (widening portion only) and they are deteriorated and cracked throughout.
(301-2320)
The pourable joint seals are partially failed and lost adhesion, debris was noticed inside the joint. (301-2330)
The seal of the joints are failed in many locations.
(312)
This element is included to indicate the presence of bearings on this structure. The bearings were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of bearing distress was noted in any superstructure element.
(331)
There were no significant defects noted.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on:Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM
Page of5
55C0115/AAAL/65718
6 Team Leader : Nelson N. Vo
UpstreamSide : 02/01/2021X-Section Date:
Top of deckMeasured From :
2.45 4.90
4.95 4.90
2.90 Vert(m)
Face of abutment 1
Northerly face of pier 2
Span 2, thalweg
Southerly face of pier 3
Face of abutment 4
Abutment 1 (South)
Location
CHANNEL X-SECTION
CommentsHoriz(m)
0.00 6.50
14.00 21.50
43.50 WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By:
Action :
EstCost:RecDate:
LOCAL AGENCY
Joints-Replace
02/20/2019
StrTarget: 2 YEARS
Replace all Type A seal at all locations
on bridge deck.
DistTarget:
EA:Status : PROPOSED
No. 27141
03/31/2021
Edwin
Mah
CIVIL
Report Author : Nelson N. Vo
Inspected By : NN.Vo/E.Mah
3/19/2021
Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer) (Date)
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on:Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM
Page of6 6
55C0115/AAAL/65718
059
12 069
0.3 MI S/O MEMORY LANE
69000
55C0115
BRISTOL ST
SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL
0 33 DEG 46 MIN 09.87 SEC
117 DEG 53 MIN 04.89 SEC
(99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER
(98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE
(3) COUNTY CODE
(2) HIGHWAY AGENCY DISTRICT
(1) STATE NAME- CALIFORNIA
(9) LOCATION-
(4) PLACE CODE
(8) STRUCTURE NUMBER
(7) FACILITY CARRIED-
(6) FEATURE INTERSECTED-
(11) MILEPOINT/KILOMETERPOINT
(16) LATITUDE
(17) LONGITUDE
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE(ON/UNDER)-
**************** IDENTIFICATION ***************
04(21) MAINTAIN-
5(37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE-
Y(112) NBIS BRIDGE LENGTH-
04(22) OWNER-
N(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE-
(103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE-
0(100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY-
14(26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS-
1(104) HIGHWAY SYSTEM-
3(20) TOLL-
2(102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC-
0(110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK -
************* CLASSIFICATION ************* CODE
8(61) CHANNEL & CHANNEL PROTECTION
N(62) CULVERTS
5(58) DECK
7(60) SUBSTRUCTURE
7(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE
**************** CONDITION **************** CODE
2(31) DESIGN LOAD-
RF= 0.91(66) INVENTORY RATING-
8(65) INVENTORY RATING METHOD-
RF= 1.18(64) OPERATING RATING-
8(63) OPERATING RATING METHOD-
5(70) BRIDGE POSTING-
A(41) STRUCTURE OPEN, POSTED OR CLOSED-
********* LOAD RATING AND POSTING ********* CODE
0(46) NUMBER OF APPROACH SPANS
3(45) NUMBER OF SPANS IN MAIN UNIT
02TYPE-
0B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE-
0C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION-
1(107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE-
1A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE-
3 (43) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN:MATERIAL-
(108) WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM:
******** STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL *********
*************** AGE AND SERVICE ***************
5(42) TYPE OF SERVICE: ON-
5UNDER-
1947(27) YEAR BUILT
2003(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED
55000(29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
2021(30) YEAR OF ADT
2 KM(19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH
04(28) LANES:ON STRUCTURE
1 %(109) TRUCK ADT
0(105) FED.LANDS HWY-
000000000000(13) LRS INVENTORY ROUTE & SUBROUTE
1(12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK-
**************** APPRAISAL **************** CODE
0 8(72) APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT
0 9(68) DECK GEOMETRY
1(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES
5(113) SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES
7(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION
0 N(69) UNDERCLEARANCES, VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL
9(71) WATER ADEQUACY
0.0 M(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT
0.0 M(55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF-
15.1 M(48) LENGTH OF MAXIMUM SPAN
NO(35) STRUCTURE FLARED
99.99 M(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY
0.00 M(54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF-
25.7 M(32) APPROACH ROADWAY WIDTH (W/SHOULDERS)
M(116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERT CLEAR
N(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL-
0.0 M(40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
0.0 M(39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
(111) PIER PROTECTION-
0(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN-
30.5 M(52) DECK WIDTH OUT TO OUT
LEFT 2.1 M RIGHT 2.1 M(50) CURB OR SIDEWALK:
5 DEG(34) SKEW
*************** GEOMETRIC DATA ****************
*************** NAVIGATION DATA ***************
31.1 M(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH
25.7 M(51) BRIDGE ROADWAY WIDTH CURB TO CURB
********** PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS **********
***********************************************
(94) BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT COST
(95) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT COST
(96) TOTAL PROJECT COST
81501(114) FUTURE ADT
2041 (115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT
90.1SUFFICIENCY RATING =
*************** INSPECTIONS ***************
(92) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION: (93) CFI DATE
(76) LENGTH OF STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT
(97) YEAR OF IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE
(75) TYPE OF WORK-
25.7 M(47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR
99.99 M(10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR
MO A)NOA) FRACTURE CRIT DETAIL-
MONOC) OTHER SPECIAL INSP- C)
MONOB) UNDERWATER INSP- B)
150000000
PART OF NET
ON FREE ROAD
CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY
CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY
NOT ELIGIBLE
YES
OTHER PRIN ART URBAN
NOT STRAHNET
ROUTE ON NHS
NONE EXISTS
2 WAY
NOT APPLICABLE
NOT ON NET
M-13.5 OR H-15
(LRFR) LD & RES FA
(LRFR) LD & RES FA
EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
OPEN, NO RESTRICTIONDESCRIPTION-
NOT APPLICABLE
NO MEDIAN
HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
WATERWAY
CONCRETE
NONE
NONE
CIP CONCRETE
(90) INSPECTION DATE (91) FREQUENCY
TYPE-
(44) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR:MATERIAL-
STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM OR GDR
STEEL
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL REPORT
% SHARE %
OTHER/NA
000OTHER/NA
MO
ON
CODE
CODE
CODE
CODE
CODE
CODE
UNDER STRUCTURE 00
NOT H/RR
CODE
CODE
CODE
02/21 24
PAINT CONDITION INDEX = 100.0
M
NOT H/RR
EXHIBIT 2
California Department of Transportation
Division of Maintenance
Structure Maintenance and Investigations
BRIDGE
INSPECTION
RECORDS
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS.
These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual.
Records for “Confidential” bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0372/AAAK/102829Page of1 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Routine-Roadway View (02/12/2019) Routine-Elevation View (02/12/2019) Routine-Underside View (02/12/2019)
PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
0.6 MI E/O HARBOR BLVDLOCATION
TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo
FACILITY CARRIED 5TH STREET
No.
REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo
FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL
BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
33°44'55.78"LATITUDE
Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer)
INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah
N N/A (NBI)CULVERT
7 GOODDECK
7 GOODSUBSTRUCTURE
7 GOODSUPERSTRUCTURE 41.0SUFFICIENCY RATING
STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
1,901
PAINT CONDITION N/A
STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
2 INTOLERABLE - REPLACESTRUCTURE EVALUATION
117°54'34.27"LONGITUDE
8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTINGSCOUR
INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) 150000000ON
POSTMILE 0
ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM NOT ON NHS
(9)
(11)
(16)
(17)
(7)
(6)
(5)
(104)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(62)
(67) (113)
Routine Inspection
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Edwin
Mah
03/31/2025
CIVIL
27141
9/11/2023
Date
Exp.
BRIDGE NO.:
55C0372
STRUCTURE NAME:
SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL February 8, 2023
INSPECTION DATE:
DECK AREA (M) 2
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0372/AAAK/102829Page of2 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Continuous 7-span CIP/RC T-girder (8 each) with RC pier walls and RC open end seat abutments, all supported upon concrete piles.
Widening: South and north overhangs were widenined.
(W) 36.0 feet, 5 @ 48.9 feet, 36.0 feet (E).
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
SPAN CONFIGURATION
(55)ORANGE
12 (69000) SANTA ANA
BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER
BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE
COUNTY CODE
HIGHWAY DISTRICT
STATE NAME
PLACE CODE
% SHARE
AGENCY INFORMATION
CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
YEAR BUILT
YEAR MODIFIED
LENGTH (M)
JOINTS
1962
SKEW
NO. OF HINGES
2010
97.5 26
23 MAIN SPANS
APPR SPANS 0
7 LOAD CAPACITY
DESIGN LOAD
INVENTORY RATING
OPERATING RATING
CALC METHOD
CALC METHOD
5 MS 18 (HS 20)
RF= 0.31
RF= 0.47
8 LRFR RATING FACTOR
8 LRFR RATING FACTOR
PERMIT RATING
POSTING LOADS
Legal
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Legal
Legal
XXXXX
MAX SPAN (M) 14.9
99.99 MUnimpaired
MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE STR FLARE 0-NO
NBIS BR LENGTH Y
STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 2: CONCRETE CONT
DESIGN TYPE MAIN 04: TEE BEAM
STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE
BRIDGE POSTING
STRUCTURE STATUS
0.0 M(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT
0.0 M(55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY
0.00 M(54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
N-NOT H/RR
N-NOT H/RR
INSPECTION INFORMATION
CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE
MO A)N-NONSTM INSP
MON-NOOTHER SPECIAL INSP C)
MON-NOUNDERWATER INSP B)
INSPECTION DATE (91) FREQUENCY MO02/23 24
MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
Safe
Loads
N/A
N/A
N/A
Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
Posting
Signs
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
35Speed N/A N/A MPH
Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements
Additional Signs
Load Rating Summary Date
Load Rating Type
09/30/22
CALIFORNIA 069
N/AN/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Posting Date N/A
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(21)
(22)
(98)
(99)
(90)
(92)
A)
B)
C)
(27)
(106)
(34)
(49)
(112)
(45)
(46)
(48)
(35)
(43a)
(43b)
(44a)
(44b)
(31)
(66)
(64)
(41)
(65)
(63)
(70)
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches
Load Rating Tool - Date BrR 7.2.0 AASHTO - 09/13/22
Calculated
N/A
STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
NONE
NONE
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0372/AAAK/102829Page of3 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS
SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure.
Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder and median area. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge.
The channel is dry.
There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure. Rain boots maybe needed if it is in raining season.
REVISIONS
The inspection frequency was modified from 24 months to 48 months.
DECK AND ROADWAY
Polyester Deck Overlay is in good condition.
There are random transverse soffit cracks with white and brown efflorescence in all bays of spans 1, 2, 6 and 7.
AC Roadway started deteriorating at both of approach and departure lanes mainly along the edge of travel way.
Both abutment joints were filled partially with debris and sand.
Both sidewalks have map cracks up to 0.05 inches wide and 8.0 inches in spacing.
SUPERSTRUCTURE
Northerly girder of span 7 has a small spall at (2.0 inches L X 2.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) at 10.0 feet from the easterly abutment.
SUBSTRUCTURE
Pier wall 3 has two spalls at (20.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 4.0 inches D) under the northerly girder, westerly fascia; and an unsound concrete at (15.0 inches L X 4.0 feet) at top of the footing cap approximately 8.0 feet above the ground at the westerly face.
The following is the locations of pier wall 5 with cracks and spalls:
There is a spall at (18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D) at the south end.
There are an unsound concrete area at (8.0 inches L X 2.0 feet W) under the northerly girder; and the other area is about (8.0 inches L X 3.0 feet W) under the northerly girder right above the footing cap.
Pier wall 2 has a vertical crack 0.05 inches wide and 5.0 feet long.
Pierwall 3 has a vertical crack 0.05 wide and 6.0 feet long at the northerly end.
Pier wall 4 has a vertical crack 0.05 inches wide and 6.0 feet long.
Pier wall 6 has a spall at (18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D) at the southerly end.
SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
The load rating for this structure is calculated on 04/06/2013 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 04/06/2013.
INSPECTION COMMENTARY
- NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
CONDITION INFORMATION
SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0372/AAAK/102829Page of4 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 TYPE OF MEMBRANE
TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION
DECK STRUCTURE TYPE
TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE
WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM
13000AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
2023 YEAR OF ADT
2 KMBYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH
1 %(109) TRUCK ADT %
27788FUTURE ADT
2041 YEAR OF FUTURE ADT
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
1-CONCRETE
0-NONE
0-NONE
1-CIP CONCRETE
DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION
19.5 M
15.8 M
DECK AND ROADWAY
LANES 4
35 0-NOT ON NHS
PARALLEL STRUCTURE
TEMPORARY STRUCTURE
DEFENSE HIGHWAY
FUNCTIONAL CLASS
SPEED
NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
TOLL
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK
TYPE OF SERVICE
FEDERAL LANDS HWY
7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIAAPPR ROADWAY ALIGN
4 TOLERABLEDECK GEOMETRY
19.2 MAPPROACH RDWY WIDTH
BRIDGE MEDIAN
LEFT 0.8 M RIGHT 0.8 MCURB OR SIDEWALK
TOTAL WIDTH
NET WIDTH
15.8 MINVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR
99.99 MINVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR
3-ON FREE ROAD
16-MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN
0-NOT STRAHNET
N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
0-NOT APPLICABLE
0-NOT ON NET
0 NO MEDIAN
5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATIONDECK GEOMETRY
(N) 1.0 foot br, 5.0 feet sw, 51.8 feet, 5.0 feet sw, 1.0 foot br (S).
DECK CROSS SECTION
LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
0 inchesOVERLAY THICKNESS (inches)
N/A
(51)
(52)
(50)
(32)
(33)
(107)
(108)
A)
B)
C)
(29)
(30)
(19)
(114)
(115)
(37)
(42a)
(12)
(13)
(104)
(26)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(10)
(47)
(68)
(72)
(105)
(110)
(20)
(28a)
(103)
97.5 MLENGTH (49)
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition State
16 Top Flange-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
Deck Wearing Surface-Concrete
2 2
2 1710
100
1540
sq.m
each
sq.m
1610
0 1540
100
100
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Defect/
Prot
1130
511
Defect
(16-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(16-511) Deck Wearing Surface-Concrete
There are random transverse soffit cracks up to 0.05 inches wide and 10.0 to 14.0 inches long with white and brown efflorescence in all bays of spans 1, 2, 6 and 7.
There were no significant defects noted.
(58) 7DECK RATING =
(36a) Rail Code 001 0
301
304
Joint-Pourable Seal
Debris Impaction (Joints)
Joint-Open Expansion
2 2
2 44
10 98
m
each
m
34 0
98 10
10 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES 2350
RAIL INFORMATION
(36b) Transition (36c) Appr Guardrail (36d) Appr Guardrail End 35Roadway Speed MPH
JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(301-2350) Debris Impaction (Joints)
(304) Joint-Open Expansion
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Both abutment hinge joint locations were filled partially with debris and sand.
There were no significant defects noted.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0372/AAAK/102829Page of5 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
Concrete lined trapezoidal with bike/maintenance path under end spans.
TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER
N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI)UNDERCLEARANCES V - H
9 ABOVE DESIRABLEWATER ADEQUACY
MVERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR
NAVIGATION CONTROL
0.0 MNAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
0.0 MNAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
PIER PROTECTION
N: NOT APPLICABLE5-WATERWAY
8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTINGSCOUR
N/ASCOUR POA DATE
CHANNEL PROTECTION 9 NO DEFICIENCIES
N/A
(42b)
(69)
(71)
(61)
(113)
(38)
(111)
(39)
(116)
(40)
110
182
312
Girder/Beam-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
Bearing-Enclosed
2 2
2 2
780
1 16
4 m
each
ea.
each
779
0 16
4 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
1080
210 Pier Wall-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 117
4 4
m
each
each
109
0 0
4 0
4 4
4 0
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 0
0 1080
1130
SUPERSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE
SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING =(59) 7
SUBSTRUCTURE RATING =(60) 7
(110-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(182) EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
(312) Bearing-Enclosed
(210-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Pierwall 3 has two spalls at (20.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 4.0 inches D) under the northerly girder, westerly fascia; and an unsound concrete at (15.0 inches L X 4.0 feet) at top of the footing cap approximately 8.0 feet above the ground at the westerly face.
The following is the locations of pier wall 5 with cracks and spalls:
There is a spall at (18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D) at the south end.
There are an unsound concrete area at (8.0 inches L X 2.0 feet W) under the northerly girder; and the other area is about (8.0 inches L X 3.0 feet W) under the northerly girder right above the footing cap.
Northerly girder of span 7 has a small spall at (2.0 inches L X 2.0 inches W X 1.0 inch D) at 10.0 feet from the easterly abutment.
There were no significant defects noted.
There were no significant defects noted.
331 Railing-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
196
5 m
each
191
0 5
5 0
0 0
0 JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES 1130
JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(331-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
There are several vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long inside of both rails.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:00 PM 55C0372/AAAK/102829Page of6 6 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations
OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Action
Est CostRec Date LOCAL AGENCY
Sub-Patch spalls
02/13/2019
Str Target ROUTINE
Sawcut, remove all loose material around the areas before patching all the concrete spalls as following locations below:
Pier wall 3 has two spalls at (20.0 inches L X 8.0 inches W X 4.0 inches D) under the northerly girder, westerly fascia; and an unsound concrete at (15.0 inches L X 4.0 feet) at top of the footing cap approximately 8.0 feet above the ground at the westerly face.
There is a spall at (18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D) at the south end.
There are an unsound concrete area at (8.0 inches L X 2.0 feet W) under the northerly girder; and the other area is about (8.0 inches L X 3.0 feet W) under the northerly girder right above the footing cap.
Dist Target
EA Status PROPOSED
DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
215
227
256
Abutment-RC
Pile-RC
Slope Protection
2 2
2 39
1 2
m
ea.
ea.
39 1
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 0
0 SUBSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE RATING =(60) 7
WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
(210-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(210-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(215) Abutment-RC
(227) Pile-RC
(256) Slope Protection
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Pier wall 6 has a spall at (18.0 inches L X 6.0 inches W X 2.0 inches D) at the southerly end.
Pier wall 2 has a vertical crack 0.05 inches wide.
Pierwall 3 has a vertical crack 0.05 wide at the northerly end.
Pier wall 4 has a vertical crack 0.05 inches wide.
There were no significant defects noted.
The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element.
There were no significant defects noted.
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
55C0372
100 - Routine-Roadway View
Feb 12, 2019 [AAAJ]
Deckview looking east
Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
55C0372
101 - Routine-Elevation View
Feb 12, 2019 [AAAJ]
Elevation looking northeast
Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
55C0372
114 - Sub-Details
Feb 12, 2019 [AAAJ]
Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
55C0372
103 - Deck-Details
Feb 12, 2019 [AAAJ]
Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
55C0372
101 - Routine-Elevation View
Feb 12, 2019 [AAAJ]
Elevation looking southeast
Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
55C0372
101 - Routine-Elevation View
Feb 12, 2019 [AAAJ]
Elevation looking south, downstream
Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
55C0372
135 - Routine-Underside View
Feb 12, 2019 [AAAJ]
Transverse soffit cracks with efflorescence
Photo #1
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
California Department of Transportation
Division of Maintenance
Structure Maintenance and Investigations
BRIDGE
INSPECTION
RECORDS
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS.
These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual.
Records for “Confidential” bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0047/AAAL/102827Page of1 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Routine-Roadway View (02/13/2019) Routine-Elevation View (02/13/2019) Routine-Underside View (02/20/2015)
PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
0.3 MI N SANTA CLARA AVELOCATION
TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo
FACILITY CARRIED FLOWER ST
No.
REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo
FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL
BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
33°46'13.83"LATITUDE
Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer)
INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah
N N/A (NBI)CULVERT
5 FAIRDECK
7 GOODSUBSTRUCTURE
7 GOODSUPERSTRUCTURE 92.4SUFFICIENCY RATING
STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
705
PAINT CONDITION N/A
STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIASTRUCTURE EVALUATION
117°52'33.61"LONGITUDE
8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTINGSCOUR
INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) 150000000ON
POSTMILE 0
ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM NOT ON NHS
(9)
(11)
(16)
(17)
(7)
(6)
(5)
(104)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(62)
(67) (113)
Routine Inspection
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Edwin
Mah
03/31/2025
CIVIL
27141
9/11/2023
Date
Exp.
BRIDGE NO.:
55C0047
STRUCTURE NAME:
SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL February 7, 2023
INSPECTION DATE:
DECK AREA (M) 2
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0047/AAAL/102827Page of2 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Simply supported 4-span CIP/RC T-girder (11 each) with RC pier walls and RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments, all supported on spread footings.
(S) 4 @ 36.0 feet (N).
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
SPAN CONFIGURATION
(55)ORANGE
12 (69000) SANTA ANA
BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER
BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE
COUNTY CODE
HIGHWAY DISTRICT
STATE NAME
PLACE CODE
% SHARE
AGENCY INFORMATION
CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
N/A
YEAR BUILT
YEAR MODIFIED
LENGTH (M)
JOINTS
1930
SKEW
NO. OF HINGES
44.5 45
05 MAIN SPANS
APPR SPANS 0
4 LOAD CAPACITY
DESIGN LOAD
INVENTORY RATING
OPERATING RATING
CALC METHOD
CALC METHOD
4 M 18 (H 20)
RF= 1.10
RF= 1.48
8 LRFR RATING FACTOR
8 LRFR RATING FACTOR
PERMIT RATING
POSTING LOADS
Legal
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Legal
Legal
PPPPP
MAX SPAN (M) 11
99.99 MUnimpaired
MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE STR FLARE 0-NO
NBIS BR LENGTH Y
STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 1: CONCRETE
DESIGN TYPE MAIN 04: TEE BEAM
STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE
BRIDGE POSTING
STRUCTURE STATUS
0.0 M(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT
0.0 M(55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY
0.00 M(54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
N-NOT H/RR
N-NOT H/RR
INSPECTION INFORMATION
CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE
MO A)N-NONSTM INSP
MON-NOOTHER SPECIAL INSP C)
MON-NOUNDERWATER INSP B)
INSPECTION DATE (91) FREQUENCY MO02/23 24
MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
Safe
Loads
N/A
N/A
N/A
Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
Posting
Signs
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
25Speed N/A N/A MPH
Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements
Additional Signs
Load Rating Summary Date
Load Rating Type
08/28/15
CALIFORNIA 069
N/AN/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Posting Date N/A
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(21)
(22)
(98)
(99)
(90)
(92)
A)
B)
C)
(27)
(106)
(34)
(49)
(112)
(45)
(46)
(48)
(35)
(43a)
(43b)
(44a)
(44b)
(31)
(66)
(64)
(41)
(65)
(63)
(70)
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches
Load Rating Tool - Date BrR 6.7.0 AASHTO - 08/28/15
Calculated
N/A
STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
NONE
NONE
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0047/AAAL/102827Page of3 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS
SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure.
Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge.
The channel is dry. There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure.
DECK AND ROADWAY
AC Roadway is in good condition at the northerly abutment.
The bridge deck has several small deck spalls scattering throughout the entire deck.
The bridge deck has numerous diagonal deck cracks at each span up to 0.06 inches wide and 16.0 inches in spacing. In addtion, there is an area of bridge deck that has been covered with Asphalt, northerly abutment.
Type A joint seal (1.0 to 1.5 inches gap at 70.0 degrees of Fahrenheit) has been cracking, disbonding completely at both abutment joint locations and hinges, mainly at northerly abutment.
Between bridge and street sidewalks have two triangular spalls (36.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D and 8.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right at the southwest corner of southerly abutment joint location.
Both concrete bridge railings were painted.
PCC approach and departure slabs are fairly new at the southerly abutment location.
The northerly abutment joint seal is covered with AC roadway at the approach.
SUPERSTRUCTURE
There is no notable distress observed at the time of inspection.
SUBSTRUCTURE
There is a debris at pier wall 3 easterly end that has been accumulating in the front at 10.0 feet wide and 5.0 feet deep. In addition, the tree is laying down at easterly end of pier wall 3; and this tree can be a cause of a large hole at this location at (30.0 feet wide x 40.0 feet long x 4.0 feet deep) southeast corner of spans 2 and 3. The work recommendation has been made back in 02/20/2015 but it has not done yet.
SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
The load rating for this structure is calculated on 08/28/2015 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 08/28/2015.
INSPECTION COMMENTARY
- NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
CONDITION INFORMATION
SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0047/AAAL/102827Page of4 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 TYPE OF MEMBRANE
TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION
DECK STRUCTURE TYPE
TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE
WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM
5500AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
2021 YEAR OF ADT
2 KMBYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH
1 %(109) TRUCK ADT %
10688FUTURE ADT
2041YEAR OF FUTURE ADT
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
1-CONCRETE
0-NONE
0-NONE
1-CIP CONCRETE
DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION
15.8 M
12.0 M
DECK AND ROADWAY
LANES 2
25 0-NOT ON NHS
PARALLEL STRUCTURE
TEMPORARY STRUCTURE
DEFENSE HIGHWAY
FUNCTIONAL CLASS
SPEED
NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
TOLL
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK
TYPE OF SERVICE
FEDERAL LANDS HWY
8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRITAPPR ROADWAY ALIGN
5 ABOVE TOLERABLEDECK GEOMETRY
19.8 MAPPROACH RDWY WIDTH
BRIDGE MEDIAN
LEFT 1.5 M RIGHT 1.5 MCURB OR SIDEWALK
TOTAL WIDTH
NET WIDTH
12.0 MINVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR
99.99 MINVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR
3-ON FREE ROAD
19-LOCAL URBAN
0-NOT STRAHNET
N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
0-NOT APPLICABLE
0-NOT ON NET
0 NO MEDIAN
5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATIONDECK GEOMETRY
(W) 1.3 feet br, 5.0 feet sw, 39.3 feet, 5.0 feet sw, 1.3 feet br (E).
DECK CROSS SECTION
LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
0 inchesOVERLAY THICKNESS (inches)
N/A
(51)
(52)
(50)
(32)
(33)
(107)
(108)
A)
B)
C)
(29)
(30)
(19)
(114)
(115)
(37)
(42a)
(12)
(13)
(104)
(26)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(10)
(47)
(68)
(72)
(105)
(110)
(20)
(28a)
(103)
44.5 MLENGTH (49)
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition State
16 Top Flange-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 703
7 200
sq.m
each
each
496
0 0
207
7 200
0 0
0 0
0 0
DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Defect/
Prot
1080
1130
Defect
(16) Top Flange-RC
(16-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(16-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Deck cracks with numerous minor deck spalls.
The bridge deck has several small deck spalls scattering throughout the entire deck.
The bridge deck has numerous diagonal deck cracks at each span up to 0.05 inches wide, 16.0 inches in spacing.
The bridge deck has random diagonal soffit cracks with white efflorescence inside most bays mainly bays # 2 and #3 throughout all spans.
(58) 5DECK RATING =
(36a) Rail Code 011 1
301 Joint-Pourable Seal
Seal Damage (Joints)
2 2
110
110
m
each
0 0
0 0
40 40
70 70
JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES 2330
RAIL INFORMATION
(36b) Transition (36c) Appr Guardrail (36d) Appr Guardrail End 25Roadway Speed MPH
JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(301) Joint-Pourable Seal
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Disbonding and cracking.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0047/AAAL/102827Page of5 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
Natural earth trapezoidal with a cobbled earth invert.
TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER
N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI)UNDERCLEARANCES V - H
8 EQUAL DESIRABLEWATER ADEQUACY
MVERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR
NAVIGATION CONTROL
0.0 MNAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
0.0 MNAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
PIER PROTECTION
N: NOT APPLICABLE5-WATERWAY
8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTINGSCOUR
N/ASCOUR POA DATE
CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 PROTECTED
N/A
(42b)
(69)
(71)
(61)
(113)
(38)
(111)
(39)
(116)
(40)
110
182
Girder/Beam-RC
EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
2 2
489
15 m
ea.
489
15 0
0 0
0 0
0 SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
210
215
Pier Wall-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
Abutment-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
2 2
2 2
66 3
68 1
m
each
m
each
63 0
67 0
3 3
1 1
0 0
0 0
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 0
0 0
1130
1080
SUPERSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE
SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING =(59) 7
SUBSTRUCTURE RATING =(60) 7
(110) Girder/Beam-RC
(182) EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
(210-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Pier wall #2 exhibits three vertical cracks 1.0 mm wide at G #3, #4 and #9.
Pier wall #3 exhibits four vertical cracks 0.5 mm wide.
Pier wall #4 exhibits three vertical cracks 0.5 mm wide.
There were no significant defects noted.
There were no significant defects noted.
321
331
Approach Slab-RC
Railing-RC
2 2
148
90 sq.m
m
148
90 0
0 0
0 0
0 JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(301-2330) Seal Damage (Joints)
(321) Approach Slab-RC
(331) Railing-RC
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
All joints seals of the pourable joints are failed completely.
There were no significant defects noted. Approach and departure slabs are with Asphalt ovelay on top.
There were no significant defects noted.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:55 PM 55C0047/AAAL/102827Page of6 6 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations
OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
Work By
Action
Est CostRec Date LOCAL AGENCY
Joints-Repair/Clean
10/04/1995
Str Target ROUTINE
Replace the deteriorated Type A joints seal as follows:
South Abutment: Width of joint is 1.75 inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.
Pier wall 2: Width of joint is 0.5 inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.
Pier wall 3: Width of joint is 1.5 inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.
Pier wall 4: Width of joint is 0.5 inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.
North Abutment: Width of joint is 1.75 inch at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.
Dist Target
EA Status PROPOSED
Work By
Action
Est Cost Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY
Scour-Place Counterm
02/20/2015
Str Target ROUTINE
Remove debris at pier wall 3 easterly end that was accumulated in the front 10.0 feet wide and 5.0 feet deep.
Remove the tree that is laying down at easterly end of pier wall #3; and this tree can be a cause of a large hole at this location 30.0 feet wide x 40.0 feet long x 4.0 feet deep.
Dist Target
EA Status PROPOSED
DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Work By
Action
Action
Est Cost
Est Cost
Rec Date
Rec Date
LOCAL AGENCY
LOCAL AGENCY
Deck-Misc.
Deck-Methacrylate
02/01/2021
02/12/2019
Str Target
Str Target
ROUTINE
ROUTINE
Sawcut, remove all loose material; and then, patch sidewalk spall with cement mortar concrete as the following location below:
Between bridge and street sidewalks have two triangular spalls (36.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D and 8.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right at the southwest corner of southerly abutment joint location.
Prior to seal deck cracks with Methacrylate. Contractors need to clean and patch all deck spalls.
Dist Target
Dist Target
EA
EA
Status
Status
PROPOSED
PROPOSED
234 Pier Cap-RC 2 1 m 1 0 0
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 SUBSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE RATING =(60) 7
WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
(215-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(234) Pier Cap-RC
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
North abutment cap exhibits a spall 2.5 X 1 ft X 1 ft, part of this spall should support the westerly girder, therefore bearing area of 6" of an equilateral triangle was lost.
The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. There were no significant defects noted.
MECHANICAL/ELECTRICAL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Action
Est CostRec Date LOCAL AGENCY
Mech/Elect-Misc.
02/01/2021
Str Target ROUTINE
Secure all the electrical conduits right in front of both abutment walls.
Dist Target
EA Status PROPOSED
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on:Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM
Page of1
55C0047/AAAK/65718
6 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Bridge Inspection Report
Structure Maintenance & Investigations
Bridge Number : 55C0047
0.3 MI N SANTA CLARA AVE
02/01/2021
STRUCTURE NAME:
Location :
Inspection Date :
SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL
Inspection Type
Routine
X
CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
N/A
Year Built :
Year Modified:
Length (m) :
No. of Joints :
1930 Skew (degrees):
No. of Hinges :44.5
45 Structure Description:Simply supported 4-span CIP/RC T-girder (11 each) with RC pier walls and RC closed end backfilled cantilever abutments, all supported on spread footings.
Span Configuration :(S) 4 @ 36.0 feet (N).
SAFE LOAD CAPACITY AND RATINGS
Design Live Load:
Inventory Rating:
Operating Rating:
Calculation Method:
Calculation Method:
M-18 OR H-20
RF= 1.10
RF= 1.48
(LRFR) LD & RES FACT RATING
(LRFR) LD & RES FACT RATING
Deck X-Section: (W) 1.3 feet br, 5.0 feet sw, 39.3 feet, 5.0 feet sw, 1.3 feet br (E).
Total Width: Net Width: No. of Lanes:
Rail Code:
Channel Description: Natural earth trapezoidal with a cobbled earth invert. 2 15.8 12.0
0111
0 5
m m
Facility Carried: FLOWER ST
SANTA ANACity :
Min. Vertical Clearance: Unimpaired
FC Underwater Special Other
SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure. Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge.
The channel is dry at the time of inspection. There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure.
INSPECTION COMMENTARY
Permit Rating :
Posting Load : LegalType 3: Type 3S2: Type 3-3:
DESCRIPTION ON STRUCTURE
LegalLegal
PPPPP
Speed: 25 mph
The bridge inspection condition assessment used for this inspection is based on the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Bridge Element Inspection Manual 2013 as defined in Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) federal law. The new element inspection methodology may result in changes to related condition and appraisal ratings on the bridge without significant physical changes at the bridge.
The element condition information contained in this report represents the current condition of the bridge based on the most recent routine and special inspections. Some of the notes presented below may be from an inspection that occurred prior to the date noted in this report. Refer to the Scope and Access section of this inspection report for a description of which portions of the bridge were inspected on this date.
NOTICE
DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
Overlay Thickness: 0.0 inches
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on:Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM
Page of2
55C0047/AAAK/65718
6 DECK AND ROADWAY
AC Roadway is in good condition at the northerly abutment.
The bridge deck has several small deck spalls scattering throughout the entire deck.
The bridge deck has numerous diagonal deck cracks at each span up to 0.06 inches wide and
16.0 inches in spacing. In addtion, there is an area of bridge deck that has been covered with Asphalt, northerly abutment.
Type A joint seal (1.0 to 1.5 inches gap at 70.0 degrees of Fahrenheit) has been cracking, disbonding completely at both abutment joint locations and hinges, mainly at northerly abutment.
Between bridge and street sidewalks have two triangular spalls (36.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D and 8.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right at the southwest corner of southerly abutment joint location.
Both concrete bridge railings were painted.
PCC approach and departure slabs are fairly new at the southerly abutment location.
The northerly abutment joint seal is covered with AC roadway at the approach.
SUPERSTRUCTURE
There is no notable distress observed at the time of inspection.
SUBSTRUCTURE
There is a debris at pier wall 3 easterly end that has been accumulating in the front at
10.0 feet wide and 5.0 feet deep. In addition, the tree is laying down at easterly end of pier wall 3; and this tree can be a cause of a large hole at this location at (30.0 feet wide x 40.0 feet long x 4.0 feet deep) southeast corner of spans 2 and 3. The work recommendation has been made back in 02/20/2015 but it has not done yet.
SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
The load rating for this structure is calculated on 08/28/2015 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 08/28/2015.
INSPECTION COMMENTARY
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4
Qty in each Condition State
16 Top Flange-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 703
7 200
sq.m
each
each
496
0 0
207
7 200
0 0
0 0
0 0
ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND COMMENTARY
Defect
/Prot
1080
1130
Defect
(16)
Deck cracks with numerous minor deck spalls.
(16-1080)
The bridge deck has several small deck spalls scattering throughout the entire deck. (16-1130)
The bridge deck has numerous diagonal deck cracks at each span up to 0.05 inches wide, 16.0 inches EXHIBIT 2
Printed on:Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM
Page of3
55C0047/AAAK/65718
6 Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
St. 1 St. 2 St. 3 St. 4
Qty in each Condition State
110
182
210
215
234
301
321
331
Girder/Beam-RC
EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
Pier Wall-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
Abutment-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Pier Cap-RC
Joint-Pourable Seal
Seal Damage (Joints)
Approach Slab-RC
Railing-RC
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 489
15 66
3 68
1 1
110
110
148
90 m
ea.
m
each
m
each
m
m
each
sq.m
m
489
15 63
0 67
0 1
0 0
148
90 0
0 3
3 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 40
40 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
70 70
0 0
ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND COMMENTARY
Defect
/Prot
1130
1080
2330
Defect
in spacing.
The bridge deck has random diagonal soffit cracks with white efflorescence inside most bays mainly bays # 2 and #3 throughout all spans.
(110)
There were no significant defects noted.
(182)
There were no significant defects noted.
(210-1130)
Pier wall #2 exhibits three vertical cracks 1.0 mm wide at G #3, #4 and #9.
Pier wall #3 exhibits four vertical cracks 0.5 mm wide.
Pier wall #4 exhibits three vertical cracks 0.5 mm wide. (215-1080)
North abutment cap exhibits a spall 2.5 X 1 ft X 1 ft, part of this spall should support the westerly girder, therefore bearing area of 6" of an equilateral triangle was lost. (234)
The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element. There were no significant defects noted. (301)
Disbonding and cracking.
(301-2330)
All joints seals of the pourable joints are failed completely. (321)
There were no significant defects noted. Approach and departure slabs are with Asphalt ovelay on top.
(331)
There were no significant defects noted.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on:Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM
Page of4
55C0047/AAAK/65718
6 WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By:
Work By:
Work By:
Work By:
Work By:
Action :
Action :
Action :
Action :
Action :
EstCost:
EstCost:
EstCost:
EstCost:
EstCost:
RecDate:
RecDate:
RecDate:
RecDate:
RecDate:
LOCAL AGENCY
LOCAL AGENCY
LOCAL AGENCY
LOCAL AGENCY
LOCAL AGENCY
Deck-Misc.
Mech/Elect-Misc.
Deck-Methacrylate
Scour-Place Counterm
Joints-Repair/Clean
02/01/2021
02/01/2021
02/12/2019
02/20/2015
10/04/1995
StrTarget:
StrTarget:
StrTarget:
StrTarget:
StrTarget:
2 YEARS
2 YEARS
2 YEARS
2 YEARS
2 YEARS
Sawcut, remove all loose material; and
then, patch sidewalk spall with cement
mortar concrete as the following location
below:
Between bridge and street sidewalks have
two triangular spalls (36.0 inches L x
6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D and 8.0 inches
L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right at
the southwest corner of southerly
abutment joint location.
Secure all the electrical conduits right
in front of both abutment walls.
Prior to seal deck cracks with
Methacrylate. Contractors need to clean
and patch all deck spalls.
Remove debris at pier wall 3 easterly end
that was accumulated in the front 10.0
feet wide and 5.0 feet deep.
Remove the tree that is laying down at
easterly end of pier wall #3; and this
tree can be a cause of a large hole at
this location 30.0 feet wide x 40.0 feet
long x 4.0 feet deep.
Replace the deteriorated Type A joints
seal as follows:
South Abutment: Width of joint is 1.75
inches at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.
Pier wall 2: Width of joint is 0.5 inches
at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.
Pier wall 3: Width of joint is 1.5 inches
at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.
Pier wall 4: Width of joint is 0.5 inches
at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.
North Abutment: Width of joint is 1.75
inch at 55.0 degrees Fahrenheit.
DistTarget:
DistTarget:
DistTarget:
DistTarget:
DistTarget:
EA:
EA:
EA:
EA:
EA:
Status :
Status :
Status :
Status :
Status :
PROPOSED
PROPOSED
PROPOSED
PROPOSED
PROPOSED
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on:Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM
Page of5
55C0047/AAAK/65718
6 Team Leader : Nelson N. Vo
No. 27141
03/31/2021
Edwin
Mah
CIVIL
Report Author : Nelson N. Vo
Inspected By : NN.Vo/E.Mah
3/19/2021
Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer) (Date)
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on:Friday 03/19/2021 08:33 AM
Page of6 6
55C0047/AAAK/65718
059
12 069
0.3 MI N SANTA CLARA AVE
69000
55C0047
FLOWER ST
SANTIAGO CREEK CHANNEL
0 33 DEG 46 MIN 13.83 SEC
117 DEG 52 MIN 33.61 SEC
(99) BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER
(98) BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE
(3) COUNTY CODE
(2) HIGHWAY AGENCY DISTRICT
(1) STATE NAME- CALIFORNIA
(9) LOCATION-
(4) PLACE CODE
(8) STRUCTURE NUMBER
(7) FACILITY CARRIED-
(6) FEATURE INTERSECTED-
(11) MILEPOINT/KILOMETERPOINT
(16) LATITUDE
(17) LONGITUDE
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE(ON/UNDER)-
**************** IDENTIFICATION ***************
04(21) MAINTAIN-
5(37) HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE-
Y(112) NBIS BRIDGE LENGTH-
04(22) OWNER-
N(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE-
(103) TEMPORARY STRUCTURE-
0(100) DEFENSE HIGHWAY-
19(26) FUNCTIONAL CLASS-
0(104) HIGHWAY SYSTEM-
3(20) TOLL-
2(102) DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC-
0(110) DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK -
************* CLASSIFICATION ************* CODE
8(61) CHANNEL & CHANNEL PROTECTION
N(62) CULVERTS
5(58) DECK
7(60) SUBSTRUCTURE
7(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE
**************** CONDITION **************** CODE
4(31) DESIGN LOAD-
RF= 1.10(66) INVENTORY RATING-
8(65) INVENTORY RATING METHOD-
RF= 1.48(64) OPERATING RATING-
8(63) OPERATING RATING METHOD-
5(70) BRIDGE POSTING-
A(41) STRUCTURE OPEN, POSTED OR CLOSED-
********* LOAD RATING AND POSTING ********* CODE
0(46) NUMBER OF APPROACH SPANS
4(45) NUMBER OF SPANS IN MAIN UNIT
04TYPE-
0B) TYPE OF MEMBRANE-
0C) TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION-
1(107) DECK STRUCTURE TYPE-
1A) TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE-
1 (43) STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN:MATERIAL-
(108) WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM:
******** STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL *********
*************** AGE AND SERVICE ***************
5(42) TYPE OF SERVICE: ON-
5UNDER-
1930(27) YEAR BUILT
0000(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED
5500(29) AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
2021(30) YEAR OF ADT
2 KM(19) BYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH
02(28) LANES:ON STRUCTURE
1 %(109) TRUCK ADT
0(105) FED.LANDS HWY-
(13) LRS INVENTORY ROUTE & SUBROUTE
0(12) BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK-
**************** APPRAISAL **************** CODE
0 8(72) APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT
1 5(68) DECK GEOMETRY
1(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES
8(113) SCOUR CRITICAL BRIDGES
7(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION
1 N(69) UNDERCLEARANCES, VERTICAL & HORIZONTAL
8(71) WATER ADEQUACY
0.0 M(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT
0.0 M(55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF-
11.0 M(48) LENGTH OF MAXIMUM SPAN
NO(35) STRUCTURE FLARED
99.99 M(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY
0.00 M(54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF-
19.8 M(32) APPROACH ROADWAY WIDTH (W/SHOULDERS)
M(116) VERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERT CLEAR
N(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL-
0.0 M(40) NAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
0.0 M(39) NAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
(111) PIER PROTECTION-
0(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN-
15.8 M(52) DECK WIDTH OUT TO OUT
LEFT 1.5 M RIGHT 1.5 M(50) CURB OR SIDEWALK:
45 DEG(34) SKEW
*************** GEOMETRIC DATA ****************
*************** NAVIGATION DATA ***************
44.5 M(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH
12.0 M(51) BRIDGE ROADWAY WIDTH CURB TO CURB
********** PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS **********
***********************************************
(94) BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT COST
(95) ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT COST
(96) TOTAL PROJECT COST
10688(114) FUTURE ADT
2041(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT
92.4SUFFICIENCY RATING =
*************** INSPECTIONS ***************
(92) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION: (93) CFI DATE
(76) LENGTH OF STRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT
(97) YEAR OF IMPROVEMENT COST ESTIMATE
(75) TYPE OF WORK-
12.0 M(47) INVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR
99.99 M(10) INVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR
MO A)NOA) FRACTURE CRIT DETAIL-
MONOC) OTHER SPECIAL INSP- C)
MONOB) UNDERWATER INSP- B)
150000000
NOT ON NET
ON FREE ROAD
CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY
CITY OR MUNICIPAL HIGHWAY AGENCY
NOT ELIGIBLE
YES
LOCAL URBAN
NOT STRAHNET
NOT ON NHS
NONE EXISTS
2 WAY
NOT APPLICABLE
NOT ON NET
M-18 OR H-20
(LRFR) LD & RES FA
(LRFR) LD & RES FA
EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
OPEN, NO RESTRICTIONDESCRIPTION-
NOT APPLICABLE
NO MEDIAN
HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
WATERWAY
CONCRETE
NONE
NONE
CIP CONCRETE
(90) INSPECTION DATE (91) FREQUENCY
TYPE-
(44) STRUCTURE TYPE APPR:MATERIAL-
TEE BEAM
CONCRETE
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL REPORT
% SHARE %
OTHER/NA
000OTHER/NA
MO
ON
CODE
CODE
CODE
CODE
CODE
CODE
UNDER STRUCTURE 00
NOT H/RR
CODE
CODE
CODE
02/21 24
PAINT CONDITION INDEX = N/A
M
NOT H/RR
EXHIBIT 2
California Department of Transportation
Division of Maintenance
Structure Maintenance and Investigations
BRIDGE
INSPECTION
RECORDS
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS.
These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual.
Records for “Confidential” bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM 55C0365/AAAN/102828Page of1 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 5 Routine-Roadway View (02/20/2019) Routine-Elevation View (02/20/2019) Routine-Underside View (02/20/2019)
PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
100' E/O FLOWER STLOCATION
TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo
FACILITY CARRIED MACARTHUR BLVD
No.
REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo
FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTA ANA DELHI CHANNEL
BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
33°41'59.57"LATITUDE
Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer)
INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah
6 DETERIORATIONCULVERT
N N/A (NBI)DECK
N N/A (NBI)SUBSTRUCTURE
N N/A (NBI)SUPERSTRUCTURE 68.9SUFFICIENCY RATING
STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
311
PAINT CONDITION N/A
STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
6 EQUAL MIN CRITERIASTRUCTURE EVALUATION
117°52'36.38"LONGITUDE
8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTINGSCOUR
INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) 150000000ON
POSTMILE 0
ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM ROUTE ON NHS
(9)
(11)
(16)
(17)
(7)
(6)
(5)
(104)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(62)
(67) (113)
Routine Inspection
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Edwin
Mah
03/31/2025
CIVIL
27141
9/11/2023
Date
Exp.
BRIDGE NO.:
55C0365
STRUCTURE NAME:
SANTA ANA DELHI CHANNEL February 6, 2023
INSPECTION DATE:
DECK AREA (M) 2
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM 55C0365/AAAN/102828Page of2 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 5 Triple (11.00 feet W x 11.00 feet H x 95.00 feet L) RC box culvert (grade top). The top of the culvert is the wearing surface. (W) 3 @ 11.00 feet (E).
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
SPAN CONFIGURATION
(55)ORANGE
12 (69000) SANTA ANA
BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER
BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE
COUNTY CODE
HIGHWAY DISTRICT
STATE NAME
PLACE CODE
% SHARE
AGENCY INFORMATION
CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
N/A
YEAR BUILT
YEAR MODIFIED
LENGTH (M)
JOINTS
1971
SKEW
NO. OF HINGES
11 0
00 MAIN SPANS
APPR SPANS 0
3 LOAD CAPACITY
DESIGN LOAD
INVENTORY RATING
OPERATING RATING
CALC METHOD
CALC METHOD
0 UNKNOWN
RF=0.75 =>24.3 metric tons
RF=1.25 =>40.5 metric tons
0 FIELD EVAL/ENG JUDG.
0 FIELD EVAL/ENG JUDG.
PERMIT RATING
POSTING LOADS
Legal
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Legal
Legal
PPPPP
MAX SPAN (M) 3.4
99.99 MUnimpaired
MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE STR FLARE 0-NO
NBIS BR LENGTH Y
STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 1: CONCRETE
DESIGN TYPE MAIN 19: CULVERT
STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE
BRIDGE POSTING
STRUCTURE STATUS
0.0 M(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT
0.0 M(55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY
0.00 M(54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
N-NOT H/RR
N-NOT H/RR
INSPECTION INFORMATION
CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE
MO A)N-NONSTM INSP
MON-NOOTHER SPECIAL INSP C)
MON-NOUNDERWATER INSP B)
INSPECTION DATE (91) FREQUENCY MO02/23 24
MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
Safe
Loads
N/A
N/A
N/A
Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
Posting
Signs
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
40Speed N/A N/A MPH
Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements
Additional Signs
Load Rating Summary Date
Load Rating Type
11/29/18
CALIFORNIA 069
N/AN/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Posting Date N/A
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(21)
(22)
(98)
(99)
(90)
(92)
A)
B)
C)
(27)
(106)
(34)
(49)
(112)
(45)
(46)
(48)
(35)
(43a)
(43b)
(44a)
(44b)
(31)
(66)
(64)
(41)
(65)
(63)
(70)
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches
Load Rating Tool - Date SMI Inspection Procedure Manual Section
5.10 - 10/26/18
Assigned Culvert
N/A
STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
NONE
NONE
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM 55C0365/AAAN/102828Page of3 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 5 UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS
SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the culvert to inspect all visible elements of the culvert structure.
Culvert deck was inspected by walking on sidewalk. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the culvert.
There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure. Rain boots maybe needed if it is in raining season.
There is about 4.0 inches deep of water inside barrel 2 only (center span).
REVISIONS
The rail code is changed from 0000 to NNNN.
DECK AND ROADWAY
There are random transverse hairline cracks up to 0.06 inches wide and 12.0 to 18.0 inches in spacing. The work-recommendation has been made to seal all the deck cracks on 03/02/2007 but it is not done.
The northerly sidewalk has longitudinal and map cracks up to 0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long.
The bottom face of the top slab has few longitudinal and transverse cracks, at the west barrel with white efflorescence at the middle and the northerly end.
One section of metal picket fence was damaged by vehicular impacts at the southwest quadrant of the westerly abutment on eastbound approach.
AC Roadway has cracks and settlement up to 2.0 inches.
CULVERT
Culvert wall 4 (east) has an incipient spall at (16.0 inches L s 14.0 inches W) at the top of the northerly end. (see the attached photo 3).
The work-recommendation has been made to patch this spall on 02/24/2017 but it is not done.
Sediment has been accumulating at the southerly end, up to 12.0 inches thick. In addition , there are two piles of debris inside barrels 1 and 3 up to 12.0 thick of mud.
The following is the locations of culvert walls with cracks:
Culvert wall 1 (west wall) has a horizontal crack, 0.03 inches wide 1.0 to 3.0 feet long at northerly half of the wall.
Culvert wall 2 has five vertical cracks up to 0.04 inches wide and 2.0 to 5.0 feet long.
Culvert wall 3 has seven vertical cracks up to 0.06 inches wide 3.0 to 6.0 feet long.
Culvert wall 4 (east) has a horizontal crack 0.05 inches wide and 30.0 feet long at the northerly end approximately 5.0 feet above the invert.
SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
The load rating for this structure is calculated on 11/29/2018 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 11/29/2018.
INSPECTION COMMENTARY
- NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
CONDITION INFORMATION
SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM 55C0365/AAAN/102828Page of4 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 5 TYPE OF MEMBRANE
TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION
DECK STRUCTURE TYPE
TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE
WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM
34000AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
2021 YEAR OF ADT
2 KMBYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH
1 %(109) TRUCK ADT %
64343FUTURE ADT
2041 YEAR OF FUTURE ADT
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
0-NONE
0-NONE
0-NONE
1-CIP CONCRETE
DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION
28.2 M
23.8 M
DECK AND ROADWAY
DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
Natural earth trapezoidal with rock slopes.
LANES 7
40 1-ROUTE ON NHS
PARALLEL STRUCTURE
TEMPORARY STRUCTURE
DEFENSE HIGHWAY
FUNCTIONAL CLASS
SPEED
NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
TOLL
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK
TYPE OF SERVICE
TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER
FEDERAL LANDS HWY
8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRITAPPR ROADWAY ALIGN
2 INTOLERABLE - REPLACEDECK GEOMETRY
N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI)UNDERCLEARANCES V - H
8 EQUAL DESIRABLEWATER ADEQUACY
23.8 MAPPROACH RDWY WIDTH
MVERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR
NAVIGATION CONTROL
0.0 MNAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
0.0 MNAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
PIER PROTECTION
BRIDGE MEDIAN
LEFT 1.3 M RIGHT 1.3 MCURB OR SIDEWALK
TOTAL WIDTH
NET WIDTH
13.4 MINVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR
99.99 MINVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR
3-ON FREE ROAD
14-OTHER PRIN ART URBAN
0-NOT STRAHNET
N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
0-NOT APPLICABLE
0-NOT ON NET
N: NOT APPLICABLE
3 CLOSED MED W/BARRIERS
5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
5-WATERWAY
DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATIONDECK GEOMETRY
(N) 0.70 feet headwall w/metal picket fence on top, 4.30 feet sw, 44.00 feet, 4.50 feet cu med, 34.00 feet, 4.30 feet sw, 0.70 feet headwall w/metal picket fence (S).
DECK CROSS SECTION
000000000000LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 1-PART OF NET
8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTINGSCOUR
N/ASCOUR POA DATE
CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 PROTECTED
0 inchesOVERLAY THICKNESS (inches)
N/A
N/A
(51)
(52)
(50)
(32)
(33)
(107)
(108)
A)
B)
C)
(29)
(30)
(19)
(114)
(115)
(37)
(42a)
(12)
(13)
(104)
(26)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(10)
(47)
(68)
(72)
(105)
(110)
(20)
(28a)
(103)
(42b)
(69)
(71)
(61)
(113)
(38)
(111)
(39)
(116)
(40)
11.0 MLENGTH (49)
SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES - NONE 241 Culvert-RC 2 87 m 51 30 6
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 SUPERSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE
SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING =(59) N
(62) CULVERT RATING = 6
DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES - NONE
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
(58) NDECK RATING =
(36a) Rail Code NNN N
JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES - NONE
RAIL INFORMATION
(36b) Transition (36c) Appr Guardrail (36d) Appr Guardrail End 40Roadway Speed MPH
JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM 55C0365/AAAN/102828Page of5 5 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations
OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Action
Est CostRec Date LOCAL AGENCY
Sub-Patch spalls
02/24/2017
Str Target ROUTINE
Remove, clean and patch culvert wall 4 (east) that exhibits incipient spall (16 inches L x 14 inches W) at the top of the northerly end. (see the attached photo 3)
Dist Target
EA Status PROPOSED
Work By
Work By
Action
Action
Est Cost
Est Cost
Rec Date
Rec Date
LOCAL AGENCY
LOCAL AGENCY
Railing-Misc.
Appr. Roadway-Repair
02/02/2021
02/02/2021
Str Target
Str Target
ROUTINE
ROUTINE
Repair the section of metal picket fence was damaged by vehicular impacts at the southwest quadrant of the westerly abutment on eastbound approach.
Repave the AC Roadway at the approach and departure lanes due to cracks, potholes and settlement.
Dist Target
Dist Target
EA
EA
Status
Status
PROPOSED
PROPOSED
DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Action
Est Cost Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY
Deck-Methacrylate
03/02/2007
Str Target ROUTINE
Clean and seal the moderate and severe cracks at the the culvert concrete top slab by coating the bridge deck with methacrylate.
Dist Target
EA Status PROPOSED
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Efflorescence/Rust Staining
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 3
3 30
each
each
each
0 0
0 2
3 25
1 0
5 SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 0
0 1080
1120
1130
SUBSTRUCTURE
(62) CULVERT RATING = 6
WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
(241) Culvert-RC
(241-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(241-1120) Efflorescence/Rust Staining
(241-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Cracks and spalls.
Culvert wall 4 (east) has an incipient spall at (16.0 inches L X 14.0 inches W) at the top of the northerly end. (see the attached photo 3).
The bottom face of the top slab has few longitudinal and transverse cracks, at the west barrel with white efflorescence at the middle and the northerly end.
The following is the locations of culvert walls with cracks:
Culvert wall 1 (west wall) has a horizontal crack, 0.03 inches wide at northerly half of the wall.
Culvert wall 2 has five vertical cracks up to 0.04 inches wide.
Culvert wall 3 has seven vertical cracks up to 0.06 inches wide.
Culvert wall 4 (east) has a horizontal crack 0.05 inches wide, 30.0 feet long at the northerly end approximately 5.0 feet above the invert.
EXHIBIT 2
California Department of Transportation
Division of Maintenance
Structure Maintenance and Investigations
BRIDGE
INSPECTION
RECORDS
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS.
These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual.
Records for “Confidential” bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM 55C0163/AAAM/102828Page of1 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 Routine-Roadway View (02/13/2019) Routine-Elevation View (02/13/2019) Routine-Underside View (02/13/2019)
PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
0.4 MI W/O FAIRVIEW STLOCATION
TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo
FACILITY CARRIED MCFADDEN AVENUE
No.
REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo
FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTA ANA RIVER
BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
33°44'14.62"LATITUDE
Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer)
INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah
N N/A (NBI)CULVERT
7 GOODDECK
7 GOODSUBSTRUCTURE
7 GOODSUPERSTRUCTURE 78.2SUFFICIENCY RATING
STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
2,266
PAINT CONDITION N/A
STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIASTRUCTURE EVALUATION
117°54'47.23"LONGITUDE
7 COUNTERMEASURESSCOUR
INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) 150000000ON
POSTMILE 0
ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM NOT ON NHS
(9)
(11)
(16)
(17)
(7)
(6)
(5)
(104)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(62)
(67) (113)
Routine Inspection
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Edwin
Mah
03/31/2025
CIVIL
27141
9/11/2023
Date
Exp.
BRIDGE NO.:
55C0163
STRUCTURE NAME:
SANTA ANA RIVER February 6, 2023
INSPECTION DATE:
DECK AREA (M) 2
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM 55C0163/AAAM/102828Page of2 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 Continuous 7-span CIP/RC T-girder (9 each) with RC pier walls and RC open end seat abutments, all supported on concrete piles.
Original (EB lanes): (W) 40.00 feet, 5 @ 54.00 feet, 40.00 feet (E). 1- Widened north side (WB lanes): (W) 53.00 feet, 5 @ 54.00 feet, 53.00 feet (E). 2- widening 9 inches from the south side.
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
SPAN CONFIGURATION
(55)ORANGE
12 (69000) SANTA ANA
BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER
BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE
COUNTY CODE
HIGHWAY DISTRICT
STATE NAME
PLACE CODE
% SHARE
AGENCY INFORMATION
CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
YEAR BUILT
YEAR MODIFIED
LENGTH (M)
JOINTS
1964
SKEW
NO. OF HINGES
1977
106.7
36 25
MAIN SPANS
APPR SPANS 0
7 LOAD CAPACITY
DESIGN LOAD
INVENTORY RATING
OPERATING RATING
CALC METHOD
CALC METHOD
5 MS 18 (HS 20)
RF=1.12 =>36.3 metric tons
RF=1.85 =>59.9 metric tons
1 LF LOAD FACTOR
1 LF LOAD FACTOR
PERMIT RATING
POSTING LOADS
Legal
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Legal
Legal
PPPPP
MAX SPAN (M) 16.5
99.99 MUnimpaired
MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE STR FLARE 0-NO
NBIS BR LENGTH Y
STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 2: CONCRETE CONT
DESIGN TYPE MAIN 04: TEE BEAM
STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE
BRIDGE POSTING
STRUCTURE STATUS
0.0 M(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT
0.0 M(55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY
0.00 M(54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
N-NOT H/RR
N-NOT H/RR
INSPECTION INFORMATION
CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE
MO A)N-NONSTM INSP
MON-NOOTHER SPECIAL INSP C)
MON-NOUNDERWATER INSP B)
INSPECTION DATE (91) FREQUENCY MO02/23 24
MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
Safe
Loads
N/A
N/A
N/A
Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
Posting
Signs
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
45Speed N/A N/A MPH
Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements
Additional Signs
Load Rating Summary Date
Load Rating Type
04/05/2013
CALIFORNIA 069
N/AN/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Posting Date N/A
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(21)
(22)
(98)
(99)
(90)
(92)
A)
B)
C)
(27)
(106)
(34)
(49)
(112)
(45)
(46)
(48)
(35)
(43a)
(43b)
(44a)
(44b)
(31)
(66)
(64)
(41)
(65)
(63)
(70)
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
OVERLAY THICKNESS 1 inches
Load Rating Tool - Date BDS - 10/07/82
Calculated
N/A
STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
NONE
NONE
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM 55C0163/AAAM/102828Page of3 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure.
Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder and median area. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge with binoculars.
There is no need for special equipment to inspect this structure. Probably, rain boots are needed if there is water inside the channel.
The channel is dry .
DECK AND ROADWAY
Bridge deck has a Polyester Concrete Overlay.
The soffit spalls as the following locations below:
At span 1, there are two spalls at (9.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) with exposed and rusted rebars approximately 8.0 feet and 10.0 feet from the westerly abutment inside bay 8 (southerly bay).
At span 6, there is a spall at (24.0 inches L x 18.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) at the widening portion approximately 20.0 feet from pier wall 7 inside bay 5 (see the attached photo no. 3).
The soffit cracks as the following locations below:
The soffit of the northerly bays has three longitudinal and transverse cracks (up to 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long) with efflorescence.
The soffit of spans 1 to 5 and 7 (only at the southerly 3 bays of the original bridge) has several transverse cracks (up to 0.05 inches wide and 8.0 to 12.0 inches long) with efflorescence.
At span 6 of the original bridge, there are few transverse cracks at 0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long with white efflorescence.
There are longitudinal and transverse cracks at 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet long scattering on both of the bridge sidewalk; and also, numerous small spalls with exposed rebars and rusted inside the face of bridge railings.
Joint-Strip Seal Expansion is inside westerly abutment joint, lanes 1 and 2 on westbound. On westbound, there are two broken pieces of strip seal inside the easterly abutment joint location.
Joint seal is not visible on eastbound at both abutment joint locations (westerly and easterly abutments) because of AC roadway covering at both approach and depart lanes.
Both hinges have type A pourable seal with 2.0 inches gap at 70.0 degrees of Fahrenheit.
There are longitudinal cracks (up to 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet long) on both bridge sidewalks.
SUPERSTRUCTURE
The following is the locations of spalls on girders:
At span 1 (westerly side), girders 5 and 6, each has a spall (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right at the middle of the span.
At span 6, girder 9 has a spall at (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 10.0 feet from the westerly side of pier wall 7.
At span 7 (see the attached photo no. 4)
Girder 1 has a spall at (3.0 inches L x 5.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 6.0 feet from the pier wall.
Girder 8 has a spall at (8.0 inches L x 10.0 inches W x 1.5 inches D) at the middle of the span, northerly face.
Girder 9 (southerly side) has a spall about (3.0 inches L x 5.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 8.0 feet from the pier wall.
There are three concrete small spalls about (3.0 inches L x 3.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) in the most southerly girder of the most easterly span; and also, at the easterly span girder 2 (counting from south) has a spall at (6.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) at mid-span.
Span 7, Southerly girder has several vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long at the easterly end.
SUBSTRUCTURE
Each pier wall has at least two vertical cracks (up to 0.05 inches wide, 10.0 to 15.0 feet long and 6.0 to 8.0 feet in spacing).
There is graffiti on bridge abutment and pier walls.
SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
The load rating for this structure is calculated 04/05/2013 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating
INSPECTION COMMENTARY
CONDITION INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM 55C0163/AAAM/102828Page of4 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS
summary sheet is archived on 04/05/2013.
INSPECTION COMMENTARY
TYPE OF MEMBRANE
TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION
DECK STRUCTURE TYPE
TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE
WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM
22000AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
2021 YEAR OF ADT
3 KMBYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH
1 %(109) TRUCK ADT %
38479FUTURE ADT
2041YEAR OF FUTURE ADT
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
2-INTEGRAL CONC.
0-NONE
0-NONE
1-CIP CONCRETE
DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION
20.3 M
16.6 M
DECK AND ROADWAY
LANES 4
45 0-NOT ON NHS
PARALLEL STRUCTURE
TEMPORARY STRUCTURE
DEFENSE HIGHWAY
FUNCTIONAL CLASS
SPEED
NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
TOLL
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK
TYPE OF SERVICE
FEDERAL LANDS HWY
6 EQUAL MIN CRITERIAAPPR ROADWAY ALIGN
5 ABOVE TOLERABLEDECK GEOMETRY
17.4 MAPPROACH RDWY WIDTH
BRIDGE MEDIAN
LEFT 1.5 M RIGHT 1.5 MCURB OR SIDEWALK
TOTAL WIDTH
NET WIDTH
16.6 MINVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR
99.99 MINVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR
3-ON FREE ROAD
16-MINOR ARTERIAL URBAN
0-NOT STRAHNET
N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
0-NOT APPLICABLE
0-NOT ON NET
0 NO MEDIAN
5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATIONDECK GEOMETRY
(S) 1.0 foot br, 5.0 feet sw, 52.00 feet, 5.00 feet sw, 1.00 foot br (N).
DECK CROSS SECTION
LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 0-NOT ON NET
- NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
1 inchesOVERLAY THICKNESS (inches)
N/A
(51)
(52)
(50)
(32)
(33)
(107)
(108)
A)
B)
C)
(29)
(30)
(19)
(114)
(115)
(37)
(42a)
(12)
(13)
(104)
(26)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(10)
(47)
(68)
(72)
(105)
(110)
(20)
(28a)
(103)
CONDITION INFORMATION
106.7 MLENGTH (49)
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition State
16 Top Flange-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
Deck Wearing Surface-Concrete
2 2
2 2
2166
1 200
1728
sq.m
each
each
sq.m
1965
0 0
1728
200
0 200
0 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Defect/
Prot
1080
1130
511
Defect
(16-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(16-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
The soffit spalls as the following locations below:
At span 1, there are two spalls at (9.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) with exposed rebars and rusted approximately 8.0 feet and 10.0 feet from the westerly abutment inside bay 8 (southerly bay).
At span 6, there is a spall at (24.0 inches L x 18.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) at the widening portion approximately 20.0 feet from pier wall 7 inside bay 5 (see the attached photo no. 3).
The soffit cracks as the following locations below:
The soffit of the northerly bays has three longitudinal and transverse cracks at 0.04 inches wide and 1.0 to 2.0 feet long with white efflorescence.
(58) 7DECK RATING =
SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM 55C0163/AAAM/102828Page of5 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 110 Girder/Beam-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 1000
4 1
m
each
each
995
0 0
3 2
1 2
2 0
0 0
0 SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
1080
1130
SUPERSTRUCTURE
SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING =(59) 7
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition State
DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Defect/
Prot Defect
(16-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(16-511) Deck Wearing Surface-Concrete
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
The soffit of spans 1 to 5 and 7 (only at the southerly 3 bays of the original bridge) has several transverse cracks up to 0.05 inches wide with white efflorescence.
At span 6 of the original bridge, there are few transverse cracks up to 0.05 inches wide with white efflorescence.
Bridge deck has a Polyester Concrete Deck Overlay.
(58) 7DECK RATING =
(36a) Rail Code 001 0
300
301
304
331
333
Joint-Strip Seal Exp
Seal Damage (Joints)
Joint-Pourable Seal
Joint-Open Expansion
Railing-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
Railing-Other
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 25
1 25
130
107
5 107
5 5
m
each
m
m
m
each
m
each
each
24 0
25 130
102
0 97
0 0
0 0
0 0
5 5
10 5
5 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES 2330
1130
1080
1130
RAIL INFORMATION
(36b) Transition (36c) Appr Guardrail (36d) Appr Guardrail End 45Roadway Speed MPH
JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(300-2330) Seal Damage (Joints)
(301) Joint-Pourable Seal
(304) Joint-Open Expansion
(331-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(333) Railing-Other
(333-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(333-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Joint seal runs across all lanes of westbound with three holes at 2.0 inches wide at the easterly abutment (see the attached photo no. 2).
There were no significant defects noted.
Along the original edge of deck and the widening edge of deck with Type A Seal.
There are longitudinal and transverse cracks at 0.05 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet long scattering on both of the bridge sidewalk.
There were no significant defects noted.
There are longitudinal and transverse cracks up to 0.05 inches wide scattering on both of bridge sidewalks.
There are numerous small spalls with exposed rebars and rusted inside the face of bridge railings.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM 55C0163/AAAM/102828Page of6 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 7 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
RC trapezoidal.
TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER
N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI)UNDERCLEARANCES V - H
8 EQUAL DESIRABLEWATER ADEQUACY
MVERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR
NAVIGATION CONTROL
0.0 MNAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
0.0 MNAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
PIER PROTECTION
0: NO CONTROL5-WATERWAY
7 COUNTERMEASURESSCOUR
N/ASCOUR POA DATE
CHANNEL PROTECTION 8 PROTECTED
N/A
(42b)
(69)
(71)
(61)
(113)
(38)
(111)
(39)
(116)
(40)
182
312
EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
Bearing-Enclosed
2 2
8 2
ea.
each
8 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
210 Pier Wall-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
119
5 m
each
114
0 5
5 0
0 SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 01130
SUPERSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE
SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING =(59) 7
SUBSTRUCTURE RATING =(60) 7
(110-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(110-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(182) EQ Restrainer Cable-Other
(312) Bearing-Enclosed
(210-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
The following is the locations of pier walls with cracks:
Pier wall 2 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide at the original portion.
Pier wall 3 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches at the original portion.
Pier wall 4 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide.
The following is the locations of spalls on girders:
At span 1 (westerly side), girders 5 and 6, each has a spall at (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right at the middle of the span.
At span 6, girder 9 has a spall at (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 10.0 feet from the westerly side of pier wall
7. At span 7 (see the attached photo no. 4)
Girder 1 has a spall at (3.0 inches L x 5.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 6.0 feet from the pier wall.
Girder 8 has a spall at (8.0 inches L x 10.0 inches W x 1.5 inches D) at the middle of the span, northerly face.
Girder 9 (southerly side) has a spall about (3.0 inches L x 5.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) approximately 8.0 feet from the pier wall.
There are three concrete small spalls about (3.0 inches L x 3.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) in the most southerly girder of the most easterly span; and also, at the easterly span girder 2 (counting from south) has a spall at (6.0 inches L x 6.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) at mid-span.
Span #7, Southerly girder has few vertical cracks up to 0.04 inches wide at the easterly end.
There were no significant defects noted.
There were no significant defects noted.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 06:57 PM 55C0163/AAAM/102828Page of7 7 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations
OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Action
Est Cost Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY
Deck-Patch spalls
02/20/2019
Str Target ROUTINE
Remove and clean all loose material around the following soffit spalls; and then, patch them with cement mortar.
At span 1, there are two spalls at (9.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) with exposed rebars and rusted approximately 8.0 feet and 10.0 feet from the westerly abutment inside Bay 8 (southerly bay).
At span 6, there is a spall at (24.0 inches L x 18.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) at the widening portion approximately 20.0 feet from pier wall 7 inside Bay 5 (see the attached photo no. 3).
The following locations have spalls along the edge of deck (between the original and widening section) below:
There is a spall at (20.0 inches L x 12.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) at mid span 6 inside Bay 5 along the original soffit edge of deck and the widening portion.
Along the longitudinal joint of span 1 inside Bay 5 (westerly span) has two spalls about (16.0 inches L x 16.0 inches W x 2.0 inches D) at the southerly side.
Dist Target
EA Status PROPOSED
215
227
Abutment-RC
Pile-RC
2 2
40 1
m
ea.
40 1
0 0
0 0
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 0
SUBSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE RATING =(60) 7
WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
(210-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(215) Abutment-RC
(227) Pile-RC
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Pier wall 5 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide.
Pier wall 6 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide.
Pier wall 7 has two vertical cracks up to 0.05 inches wide.
There were no significant defects noted.
The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element.
EXHIBIT 2
California Department of Transportation
Division of Maintenance
Structure Maintenance and Investigations
BRIDGE
INSPECTION
RECORDS
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
The requested documents have been generated by BIRIS.
These documents are the property of the California Department of Transportation and should be handled in accordance with Deputy Directive 55 and the State Administrative Manual.
Records for “Confidential” bridges may only be released outside the Department of Transportation upon execution of a confidentiality agreement.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM 55C0689/AAAE/102830Page of1 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Routine-Roadway View (02/13/2019) Routine-Elevation View (02/13/2019) Routine-Underside View (02/13/2019)
PHOTOGRAPH IDENTIFICATION
0.5 MI E/O HARBOR BLVDLOCATION
TEAM LEADER Nelson N. Vo
FACILITY CARRIED FIRST STREET
No.
REPORT AUTHOR Nelson N. Vo
FEATURE INTERSECTED SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL
BRIDGE LOCATION INFORMATION
33°44'42.38"LATITUDE
Edwin Mah (Registered Civil Engineer)
INSPECTED BY NN.Vo/E.Mah
N N/A (NBI)CULVERT
7 GOODDECK
7 GOODSUBSTRUCTURE
7 GOODSUPERSTRUCTURE 75.4SUFFICIENCY RATING
STRUCTURALLY DEFICIENT (SD) STATUS NOT SD
2,734
PAINT CONDITION N/A
STRUCTURAL HEALTH CONDITION SUMMARY INFORMATION
7 ABOVE MIN CRITERIASTRUCTURE EVALUATION
117°54'40.94"LONGITUDE
8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTINGSCOUR
INVENTORY RTE(ON/UNDER) 15000000ON
POSTMILE 0
ON NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM ROUTE ON NHS
(9)
(11)
(16)
(17)
(7)
(6)
(5)
(104)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(62)
(67) (113)
Routine Inspection
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Edwin
Mah
03/31/2025
CIVIL
27141
9/11/2023
Date
Exp.
BRIDGE NO.:
55C0689
STRUCTURE NAME:
SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL February 9, 2023
INSPECTION DATE:
DECK AREA (M) 2
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM 55C0689/AAAE/102830Page of2 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 Three span PC/PS concrete "I" girder (10) with stay in place form on two RC pier wall and two closed end RC cantilever abutments with monolithic wingwalls supported on RC pile cap on PC/PS concrete piles. (W) 100.00 feet, 120.00 feet, 100.00 feet (E).
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
SPAN CONFIGURATION
(55)ORANGE
12 (69000) SANTA ANA
BORDER BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER
BORDER BRIDGE STATE CODE
COUNTY CODE
HIGHWAY DISTRICT
STATE NAME
PLACE CODE
% SHARE
AGENCY INFORMATION
CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION
N/A
YEAR BUILT
YEAR MODIFIED
LENGTH (M)
JOINTS
2012
SKEW
NO. OF HINGES
97.5 18
02 MAIN SPANS
APPR SPANS 0
3 LOAD CAPACITY
DESIGN LOAD
INVENTORY RATING
OPERATING RATING
CALC METHOD
CALC METHOD
5 MS 18 (HS 20)
RF=1.00 =>32.4 metric tons
RF=1.67 =>54.1 metric tons
A ASSIGNED LFD
A ASSIGNED LFD
PERMIT RATING
POSTING LOADS
Legal
Type 3
Type 3S2
Type 3-3
Legal
Legal
PPPPP
MAX SPAN (M) 36.6
99.99 MUnimpaired
MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE MINIMUM LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE STR FLARE 0-NO
NBIS BR LENGTH Y
STRUCTURE TYPE MAIN 5: PRESTRESS CONC
DESIGN TYPE MAIN 02: STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM
STRUCTURE TYPE APPR 0: OTHER/ NOT APPLICABLE
DESIGN TYPE APPR 00: OTHER/NOT APPLICABLE
BRIDGE POSTING
STRUCTURE STATUS
0.0 M(56) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR LT
0.0 M(55) MIN LAT UNDERCLEAR RT REF(53) MIN VERT CLEAR OVER BRIDGE RDWY
0.00 M(54) MIN VERT UNDERCLEAR REF
5 AT/ABOVE LEGAL LOADS
A-OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
N-NOT H/RR
N-NOT H/RR
INSPECTION INFORMATION
CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (93) CFI DATE
MO A)N-NONSTM INSP
MON-NOOTHER SPECIAL INSP C)
MON-NOUNDERWATER INSP B)
INSPECTION DATE (91) FREQUENCY MO02/23 24
MAINTAIN 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
OWNER 04 CITY OR MUNICIPAL HI
Safe
Loads
N/A
N/A
N/A
Existing
Ordinance/Order
N/A
N/A
Posting
Signs
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
U.S. Tons
40Speed N/A N/A MPH
Additional Ordinance/Order Requirements
Additional Signs
Load Rating Summary Date
Load Rating Type
04/28/15
CALIFORNIA 069
N/AN/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Posting Date N/A
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(21)
(22)
(98)
(99)
(90)
(92)
A)
B)
C)
(27)
(106)
(34)
(49)
(112)
(45)
(46)
(48)
(35)
(43a)
(43b)
(44a)
(44b)
(31)
(66)
(64)
(41)
(65)
(63)
(70)
OPERATIONAL INFORMATION
OVERLAY THICKNESS 0 inches
Load Rating Tool - Date As Built, Contract Plans - 04/28/15 Assigned by Design LFD
N/A
STRUCTURE OVERVIEW
NONE
NONE
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM 55C0689/AAAE/102830Page of3 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 UNDERWATER INVESTIGATION DETAILS - NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
STEEL INVESTIGATION DETAILS
SCOPE AND ACCESS
A complete routine inspection was performed by walking on and around the bridge to inspect all visible elements of the bridge structure.
Bridge deck was inspected by walking on shoulder and median area. Soffit and all substructure were inspected by walking underneath the bridge with rain boots if it is in raing season.
There is no need for a special equipment to inspect this structure.
The channel is dry.
REVISIONS
The entire quantity of RC abutments ELI 215 is modified from 25 m to 35 m because the wingwalls are monolithic with the abutments.
DECK AND ROADWAY
There are longitudinal and transverse deck cracks (up to 0.06 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet in spacing) throughout the entire deck.
The metal corregated deck form covers the deck soffit. The work recommendation has been made to treat bridge deck cracks, but it is not done.
There are transverse cracks with white efflorescence under both deck overhangs, on bridge deck soffit and inside closure pour.
There are longitudinal cracks up to 0.05 inches wide throughout both approach and departure slabs.
There are numerous small spalls at (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) mainly inside the northerly rail at middle of the bridge. In addition, there are longitudinal cracks up to 0.05 on both sidewalks.
There is debris inside strip seal gap.
The northerly bridge railing was painted.
SUPERSTRUCTURE
At span 1, the girder 10 has two spalls (3.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right above the bike path approximately 40.0 feet from the westerly abutment.
The following is the locations of spalls due to the previous fire years ago under span 1.
Girder 8, there is a spall at (15.0 feet L x 2.0 feet W x 1.0 inch D) at the southerly face; and also, the bottom flange surface has a spall at
6.0 feet L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D (see the attached photos no. 1 and 2).
Girder 9, there is a spall (9.0 feet L x 2.0 feet W x 1.0 inch D) at the northerly face (see the attached photo no. 3). The work recommendation has been made in 2017 but it is not done.
SUBSTRUCTURE
Pier wall 2 has a vertical crack up to 0.04 inches wide.
Pier wall 3 has a vertical crack up to 0.04 inches wide.
SAFE LOAD CAPACITY
The load rating for this structure is calculated on 04/28/2015 by SMI Ratings Branch using BrR 6.8.0 AASHTO analysis, and the load rating summary sheet is archived on 04/28/2015.
INSPECTION COMMENTARY
- NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS BRIDGE.
CONDITION INFORMATION
SPECIAL INSPECTION INFORMATION
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM 55C0689/AAAE/102830Page of4 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 TYPE OF MEMBRANE
TYPE OF DECK PROTECTION
DECK STRUCTURE TYPE
TYPE OF WEARING SURFACE
WEARING SURFACE / PROTECTIVE SYSTEM
30000AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC
2021 YEAR OF ADT
2 KMBYPASS, DETOUR LENGTH
1 %(109) TRUCK ADT %
53226FUTURE ADT
2040 YEAR OF FUTURE ADT
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE 5: NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NRHP
0-NONE
0-NONE
0-NONE
1-CIP CONCRETE
DECK STRUCTURE INFORMATION
28.0 M
21.4 M
DECK AND ROADWAY
LANES 6
40 1-ROUTE ON NHS
PARALLEL STRUCTURE
TEMPORARY STRUCTURE
DEFENSE HIGHWAY
FUNCTIONAL CLASS
SPEED
NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM
TOLL
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC
DESIGNATED NATIONAL NETWORK
TYPE OF SERVICE
FEDERAL LANDS HWY
8 EQUAL DESIRABLE CRITAPPR ROADWAY ALIGN
2 INTOLERABLE - REPLACEDECK GEOMETRY
21.4 MAPPROACH RDWY WIDTH
BRIDGE MEDIAN
LEFT 2.4 M RIGHT 2.4 MCURB OR SIDEWALK
TOTAL WIDTH
NET WIDTH
10.7 MINVENTORY ROUTE TOTAL HORIZ CLEAR
99.99 MINVENTORY ROUTE MIN VERT CLEAR
3-ON FREE ROAD
14-OTHER PRIN ART URBAN
0-NOT STRAHNET
N-NONE EXISTS
2-2 WAY
0-NOT APPLICABLE
0-NOT ON NET
3 CLOSED MED W/BARRIERS
5-HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN
DECK ROADWAY/OPERATIONAL INFORMATIONDECK GEOMETRY
(N) 1.00 foot br, 8.00 feet sw, 36.00 feet, 4.00 feet conc curb med., 3d6.00 feet , 8.00 feet sw, 1.00 foot br (S).
DECK CROSS SECTION
000000000000LRS INVENTORY RTE & SUBRTE
BASE HIGHWAY NETWORK 1-PART OF NET
0 inchesOVERLAY THICKNESS (inches)
N/A
(51)
(52)
(50)
(32)
(33)
(107)
(108)
A)
B)
C)
(29)
(30)
(19)
(114)
(115)
(37)
(42a)
(12)
(13)
(104)
(26)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(10)
(47)
(68)
(72)
(105)
(110)
(20)
(28a)
(103)
97.5 MLENGTH (49)
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition State
12 Deck-RC
Efflorescence/Rust Staining
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 2087
30 300
sq.m
each
each
1757
0 0
280
30 250
50 0
50 0
0 0
DECK ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
Defect/
Prot
1120
1130
Defect
(12-1120) Efflorescence/Rust Staining
(12-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
There are random transverse cracks with white efflorescence under both deck overhang and bridge deck soffit.
There are longitudinal and transverse deck cracks (up to 0.06 inches wide and 1.0 to 3.0 feet in spacing) throughout the entire deck. (58) 7DECK RATING =
(36a) Rail Code 001 0
300
321
Joint-Strip Seal Exp
Approach Slab-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
2 2
2 60
411
100
m
sq.m
each
60 311
0 0
80 80
0 20
20 0
0 0
JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES 1130
RAIL INFORMATION
(36b) Transition (36c) Appr Guardrail (36d) Appr Guardrail End 40Roadway Speed MPH
JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(300) Joint-Strip Seal Exp
(321-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
There were no significant defects noted.
There are map cracks up to 0.06 inches wide throughout both approach and departure slabs.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM 55C0689/AAAE/102830Page of5 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations 6 DESCRIPTION UNDER STRUCTURE
CHANNEL DESCRIPTION
Trapezoidal concrete lined.
TYPE OF SERVICE UNDER
N NOT APPLICABLE (NBI)UNDERCLEARANCES V - H
9 ABOVE DESIRABLEWATER ADEQUACY
MVERT-LIFT BRIDGE NAV MIN VERTICAL CLEAR
NAVIGATION CONTROL
0.0 MNAVIGATION HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE
0.0 MNAVIGATION VERTICAL CLEARANCE
PIER PROTECTION
N: NOT APPLICABLE5-WATERWAY
8 STABLE ABOVE FOOTINGSCOUR
N/ASCOUR POA DATE
CHANNEL PROTECTION 9 NO DEFICIENCIES
N/A
(42b)
(69)
(71)
(61)
(113)
(38)
(111)
(39)
(116)
(40)
109
310
Girder/Beam-PS Conc.
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Bearing-Elastomeric
2 2
2 976
10 60
m
each
each
966
0 60
0 0
0 10
10 0
0 0
0 SUPERSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
1080
210
215
Pier Wall-RC
Cracking (RC and Other)
Abutment-RC
2 2
2 60
2 82
m
each
m
58 0
82 2
2 0
0 0
0 SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 0
0 1130
SUPERSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE
SUPERSTRUCTURE RATING =(59) 7
SUBSTRUCTURE RATING =(60) 7
(109-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
(310) Bearing-Elastomeric
(210-1130) Cracking (RC and Other)
(215) Abutment-RC
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Pier wall 2 has a vertical crack up to 0.04 inches wide and 5.0 feet long.
Pier wall 3 has a vertical crack up to 0.04 inches wide and 5.0 feet long.
At span 1, the girder 10 has two spalls (3.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) right above the bike path approximately 40.0 feet from the westerly abutment.
The following is the locations of spalls due to the previous fire years ago under span 1.
Girder 8, there is a spall at (15.0 feet L x 2.0 feet W x 1.0 inch D) at the southerly face; and also, the bottom flange surface has a spall at 6.0 feet L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D (see the attached photos no. 1 and 2).
Girder 9, there is a spall (9.0 feet L x 2.0 feet W x 1.0 inch D) at the northerly face (see the attached photo no. 3).
There were no significant defects noted.
331 Railing-RC
Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
2 2
207
4 m
each
203
0 4
4 0
0 0
0 JOINT/APPROACH/RAIL ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES 1080
JOINT - APPROACH - RAIL
(331-1080) Delamination/Spall/Patched Area
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
There are numerous small spalls at (2.0 inches L x 2.0 inches W x 1.0 inch D) mainly inside the northerly rail at the middle of the bridge. In addition, there are random longitudinal sidewalk cracks up to 0.05 on both sides.
EXHIBIT 2
Printed on: Monday 09/11/2023 07:04 PM 55C0689/AAAE/102830Page of6 6 Department of Transportation - Division of Maintenance Structure Maintenance & Investigations
OTHER WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
JOINT/APPR/RAIL WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
SUPERSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
SUBSTRUCTURE WORK RECOMMENDATIONS - NONE
Work By
Action
Est Cost Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY
Super-Patch spalls
03/07/2017
Str Target ROUTINE
Patch all spalls on girders 8 and 9 of span 1.
Dist Target
EA Status PROPOSED
DECK WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
Work By
Action
Est Cost Rec Date LOCAL AGENCY
Deck-Methacrylate
02/20/2019
Str Target ROUTINE
Treat deck, approach and departure slab cracks with Methacrylate.
Dist Target
EA Status PROPOSED
227 Pile-RC 2 1 ea. 1 0 0
SUBSTRUCTURE ELEMENT INSPECTION RATINGS AND NOTES
0 SUBSTRUCTURE
SUBSTRUCTURE RATING =(60) 7
WORK RECOMMENDATIONS
(215) Abutment-RC
(227) Pile-RC
Element DescriptionElem
No.
Env Total
Qty
Units
CS 1 CS 2 CS 3 CS 4
Qty in each Condition StateDefect/
Prot Defect
Monolithic wingwalls are included in the total quantity.
The pile element is included to indicate the presence of piles on this structure. The piles were not exposed for visual inspection. No indication of pile distress was noted in any substructure element.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
PLEASE SEE BELOW
EXHIBIT VI
LOCATION MAP AND BPMP PLAN
EXHIBIT 2
PM00187
Priority
(Lowest
Number is
Top
Agency
Location
REQUEST
PE-Phase
Bridge
Number
from
Inspection
Facility Carried Feature Intersected Location
Sufficiency
Rating
SD/FO
Status Work Description
Deck Area
(ft2)
Unit Cost
($/ft2) Federal Share Local Share
Total Particip.
Cost
1 City of Santa
Ana
PE-Phase 55C0055 MAIN STREET SANTIAGO CREEK
CHANNEL
0.2 MI N/O ROUTE 5
FWY
90.8 SD Core Bridge Deck and Test for Cloride Content
15510 $ 2.84 $ 35,216.00 $ 8,804.00 $ 44,020.00 2 City of Santa
Ana
PE-Phase 55C0423 17TH STREET SANTA ANA RIVER
CHANNEL
0.2 MI E/O FAIRVIEW ST 81.3 - Chain Deck; Core Deck and Test for Cloride Content; Clean and replace joint seals; Apply Methacrylate to Deck 32936 $ 13.41 $ 353,312.00 $ 88,328.00 $ 441,640.00 3 City of Santa
Ana
PE-Phase 55C0115 BRISTOL STREET SANTIAGO CREEK
CHANNEL
0.3 MI S/O MEMORY
LANE
84.8 - Clean and Replace Expasion joints; Apply Methacrylate to Deck 10200 $ 18.66 $ 152,232.00 $ 38,058.00 $ 190,290.00 4 City of Santa
Ana
PE-Phase 55C0372 5TH STREET 5TH STREET 0.6 MI E/O HARBOR BLVD
79.5 - Clean and Replace Transvers Joint seals 20480 $ 1.88 $ 30,816.00 $ 7,704.00 $ 38,520.00 5 City of Santa
Ana
PE-Phase 55C0047 FLOWER STREET SANTIAGO CREEK
CHANNEL
0.3 MI N SANTA CLARA
AVE
90.5 SD Apply Methacrylate, Clean and replace expansion joints 7685 $ 18.38 $ 113,008.00 $ 28,252.00 $ 141,260.00 6 City of Santa
Ana
PE-Phase 55C0365 MACARTHUR BL SANTA ANA DELHI
CHANNEL
100' E/O FLOWER ST 66.4 FO Clean and replace Longitudinal Joint; Apply Methacrylate 3420 $ 14.53 $ 39,760.00 $ 9,940.00 $ 49,700.00 7 City of Santa
Ana
PE-Phase 55C0163 MCFADDEN
AVENUE
SANTA ANA RIVER 0.4 MI W/O FAIRVIEW
ST
78.9 - Clean and Replace Longitudinal Joint and transverse Expasion joints; 25071 $ 2.88 $ 57,800.00 $ 14,450.00 $ 72,250.00 8 City of Santa
Ana
PE-Phase 55c0689 FIRST STREET SANTA ANA
GARDENS CHANEL
0.5 MI E/O HARBOR
BLVD
75.4 - Apply Methacrylate 29370 $ 8.43 $ 197,976.00 $ 49,494.00 $ 247,470.00 $ 980,120.00 $ 245,030.00 $ 1,225,150.00 Summary:
Total
Participating
Cost
Federal Match
(80%)
Local Match
(20%)
CON= $ 1,225,150.00 $ 980,120.00 $ 245,030.00 PE Phase Request ===>> 25% PE= $ 306,287.50 $ 245,030.00 $ 61,257.50 15% CE= $ 183,772.50 $ 147,018.00 $ 36,754.50 25% Cont= $ 306,287.50 $ 245,030.00 $ 61,257.50 Total= $ 2,021,497.50 $ 1,617,198.00 $ 404,299.50 City of Santa Ana
BPMP Plan ‐2020
rev. 9/28/22 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 2
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Certification - I certify that I have read, understand and agree to the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposals. I have examined the Scope of Services (Exhibit I) and am qualified to provide services being requested as specified herein. I understand and agree that I am responsible for reporting any errors, omissions or discrepancies to the City for clarification prior to the submission of my proposal.
PROPOSER’S STATEMENT: I have read, understood and agree to the terms and conditions on all pages of the Request for Proposals. Upon request, I will transfer and deliver goods or services to the City in accordance with said terms and conditions.
__________________________________________________________________________________
LEGAL NAME OF COMPANY PHONE AND FAX NUMBERS
__________________________________________________________________________________
BUSINESS ADDRESS
__________________________________________________________________________________
PRINTED NAME OF AUTHORIZED AGENT TITLE
__________________________________________________________________________________
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED AGENT DATE E-MAIL ADDRESS
__________________________________________________________________________________
FEDERAL ID NUMBER (IF APPLICABLE) CONTRACTOR LICENSE NUMBER (IFAPPLICABLE)
__________________________________________________________________________________
CITY OF SANTA ANA BUSINESS LICENSE NUMBER
(PLEASE PROVIDE IF AVAILABLE, BUT NOT REQUIRED UNTIL AND IF AN AWARD IS MADE TO PROPOSER.)
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.
ATTACHMENT A
PROPOSER’S CERTIFICATION, PROPOSAL PRICING
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Proposer understands and agrees that this written RFP (or any part thereof specifically designated and accepted by the City of Santa Ana, hereinafter City) shall constitute the entire agreement between proposer and the City only after it has been accepted by the City Council, endorsed by the Clerk of the Council with her signature and official seal noting hereon the action of approval of the Council, signed by the Executive Director or his duly authorized agent, and signed by the City Attorney, denoting his approval of the form of this document, and its execution, and when it or an exact copy of it has been either delivered to proposer or deposited with the United States Postal Service properly addressed to the proposer with the correct postage affixed thereto.
Proposer further agrees that upon delivery (as defined above) of the accepted agreement he/she will furnish City all required bonds and certificate of liability insurance within ten (10) days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and City’s legal holidays), or the funds, check, draft, or proposer’s bond substituted in lieu thereof accompanying this proposal shall become the property of the City and shall be considered as payment of damages due to the delay and other causes suffered by City because of the failure to furnish the necessary bonds and because it is distinctly agreed that the proof of damages actually suffered by City is difficult to ascertain; otherwise said funds, check drafts, or proposer’s bond substituted in lieu thereof shall be returned to the undersigned.
Proposer understands that a proposal is required for the entire work, that the estimated quantities set forth in the RFP schedule are solely for the purpose of comparing proposals, and that final compensation under the contract will be based upon the actual quantities of work satisfactorily completed.
All terms contained in the specifications, the certification of nondiscrimination by contractors, and the required insurance certificates are to be incorporated by reference into this agreement and are made specifically as part of this RFP.
Firm________________________________________________________________________________
Signed and Printed Name: ______________________________________________________________
Title ________________________________________________________________________________
Date
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.
ATTACHMENT B
PROPOSER’S STATEMENT
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
(Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code Section 7106)
To the CITY OF SANTA ANA
In accordance with Title 23 United States Code Section 112 and Public Contract Code 7106 the proposer declares that the proposal is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the proposer has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other proposer to put in a false or sham proposal, and has not dire ctly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived or agreed with any proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that the proposer has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price of the proposer or any proposer, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the proposal price, or of that of any other proposer, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in the proposal are true; and, further, that the proposer has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal.
Note: The above non -collusion affidavit is part of the proposal. Signing this proposal on the signature portion thereof shall also constitute signature of this non-collusion affidavit. Proposers are cautioned that making a false certification may subject the certifier to criminal prosecution.
Signed____________________________________________________________________________
State of ________, County of __________________________________________________________
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this________ day of_____________, 20____, by ________________________, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me.
________________________
Notary Public Signature Notary Public Seal
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.
ATTACHMENT C
NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
The prospective participant certifies, by signing and submitting this bid or proposal, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering i nto of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any Federal agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or coope rative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities," in conformance with its instructions.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a c ivil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
The prospective participant also agrees by submitting his or her bid or proposal that he or she shall require that the language of this certification be included in all lower tier subcontracts, which exceed $100,000 and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
Signed:
Title:
Firm:
Date:
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.
ATTACHMENT D
NON-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
The undersigned consultant or corporate officer, during the performance of this contract, certifies as follows:
1. The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without, regard to their race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.
2. The Consultant shall, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
3. The Consultant shall send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he/she has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers’ representatives of the Consultant’s commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.
4. The Consultant shall comply with all provisions of Executive Orde r 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor.
5. The Consultant shall furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his/her books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation, to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders.
1. In the event of the Consultant’s non-compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, the contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Execution Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulations, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.
2. The Consultant shall include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (7) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to Section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontract
ATTACHMENT E
NON-DISCRIMINATION CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance; provided, however, that in the event the Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subconsultant or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Consultant may request that the United States enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States.
8. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1735, as added by Chapter 643 Stats. 1939, and as amended, no discrimination shall be made in the employment of persons upon public works because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicaps, mental condition, marital status, or sex of such persons, except as provided in Section 1420, and any consultant of public works violating this Section is subject to all the penalties imposed for a violation of the Chapter.
Signed:
Title:
Firm:
Date:
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Bidder acknowledges and agrees that under Public Contract Code section 4100, et seq., it must clearly set forth below the name and location of each subcontractor who will perform work or labor or render service to the bidder in or about the work in an amount in e xcess of one-half of one percent (0.5%) of bidder’s total bid and the kind of work that each will perform. Furthermore, bidder acknowledges and agrees that under Public Contract Code section 4100, et seq., if bidder fails to list as to any portion of work, or if bidder lists more than one subcontractor to perform the same portion of work (i.e. bidder must indicate what portion of the work each subcontractor will perform), bidder must perform that portion itself or be subjected to penalty under applicable la w.
If alternate bids are called for and bidder intends to use subcontractors different from or in addition to those subcontractors listed for work under the base bid, bidder must list subcontractors that will perform work in an amount in excess of one half of one percent (0.5%) of bidder’s total bid, including alternates.
In case more than one subcontractor is named for the same kind of work, the Contractor is to state the portion of work that each subcontractor will perform. Bidders or suppliers of mater ials only do not need to be listed. If further space is required for the list of proposed subcontractors, additional sheets showing the required information, as indicated below, shall be attached hereto and made a part of this document.
Listed below is the name of each subcontractor that will perform work, labor, or render services to the undersigned related to the work of this project. This is to include any subcontractor that will specially fabricate and install a portion of work according to detailed dr awings contained in the plans and specifications in the amount greater than one half of one percent (.05%) of the contractors total bid. Additional sheets may be attached if needed.
Subcontractor Name: Location:
Portion of Work/Trade:
Bid Amount
Contractor’s License Number
DIR Registration No.
Subcontractor Name: Location:
Portion of Work/Trade: Bid Amount:
Contractor’s License No: DIR Registration No:
Contractor will not be subcontracting any portion of work.
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.
ATTACHMENT F
SUBCONTRACTOR DESIGNATION FORM
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Bidder hereby acknowledges that they have reviewed the California Air Resources Board’s policies, rules and regulations and are familiar with the requirements of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, Division 3, Chapter 9, effective on January 1, 2024 (the “Regulation”). Bidder hereby certifies, subject to penalty for perjury, that the option checked below relating to the Bidder’s fleet, and/or that of their subcontractor(s) (“Fleet”) is true and correct:
The Fleet is subject to the requirements of the Regulation, and the appropriate Certificate(s) of Reported Compliance have been attached hereto.
The Fleet is exempt from the Regulation under section 2449.1(f)(2), and a signed description of the subject vehicles, and reasoning for exemption has been attached hereto. Bidder and/or their subcontractor is unable to procure R99 or R100 renewable diesel fuel as defined in the Regulation pursuant to section 2449.1(f)(3). Bidder shall keep detailed records describing the normal refueling methods, their attempts to procure renewable diesel fuel and proof that shows they were not able to procure renewable diesel (i.e. third-party correspondence or vendor bids). The Fleet is exempt from the requirements of the Regul ation pursuant to section 2449(i)(4) because this Project has been deemed an Emergency, as defined under section 2449(c)(18). Bidder shall only operate the exempted vehicles in the emergency situation and records of the exempted vehicles must be maintained , pursuant to section 2449(i)(4).
The Fleet does not fall under the Regulation or are otherwise exempted and a detailed reasoning is attached hereto.
_________________________________________________________________ Bidder’s Company Name (please print or type)
__________________________________________________________________ Signature of Bidder
__________________________________________________________________ Print Name
__________________________________________________________________ Title
___________________________________
DOORS ID
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.
ATTACHMENT G
CARB FLEET COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
This is to certify that the undersigned Proposer and subconsultants have read and undertand the CWA entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, Los Angeles/Orange Counties Build ing and Construction Trades Council, and the signatory Craft Councils and Local Unions, effective as of June 6, 2023. The Undersigned Proposer hereby agrees to comply with all terms and conditions of the CWA, and are capable of completing construction of t he project continuously, without interruptions or delays. If awarded any work covered by the CWA, Proposer will also be required to sign a Letter of Assent that appears as Attachment A to the CWA documents.
Signed:
Title:
Firm:
Date:
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.
ATTACHMENT H
STATEMENT REGARDING COMMUNITY WORKFORCE AGREEMENT (CWA)
REQUIREMENTS
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
On April 4, 2022, the federal government stopped using the DUNS Number to uniquely identify entities.
Now, entities doing business with the federal government use the Unique Entity ID created in SAM.gov.
They no longer have to go to a third -party website to obtain their identifier. This transition allows the government to streamline the entity identification and validation process, making it easier and less burdensome for entities to do business with the federal government.
This RFP includes federal funding, and as such, the proposer must provide verification of their SAM.gov UEI and registration status. Please attach your entity’s registration from SAM.gov, including UEI and active registration status.
Proposer’s UEI:_______________________________________________
SAM.gov Registration Expiration Date:
ATTACHMENT I
SAM.GOV UEI VERIFICATION
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, as amended, Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension, 2 CFR Part 2998, Subpart C, Responsibilities of Participants Regarding Transactions. The regulations were published a s Part VII of the May 26, 1988, Federal Register (Pages 19160-19211), and as subsequently amended in 81 Federal Register 25585. (Before completing certification, read instructions which are an integral part of certification)
1. Pursuant to 2 CFR 180.335, the prospective primary participant, (i.e. grantee) certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
a. Are not presently excluded or disqualified;
b. Have not been convicted within the preceding three years of any of the offenses listed in 2CFR 180.800(a) or had a civil judgment rendered against them for one of those offenses within that time period.
c. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity (Federal, State or local) with comm ission of any of the offenses listed in 2 CFR 180.800(a);and
d. Have not had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated within the preceding three years for cause or default.
2. Where the prospective primary participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
Consultant
Name and Title of Official Authorized to Certify
On Behalf of the Consultant
Date
THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL.
PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.
ATTACHMENT J
CERTIFICATE REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INEGIBILITY AND
VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
INSTRUCTION FOR CERTIFICATION
1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds is providing the certification as set out below.
2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the Department of Labor (DOL) may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment.
3. The prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds learns that its certification was erroneous whom submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
4. The terms “covered transaction”, “debarment”, “suspension”, “disqualified,” “ineligible”, “lower tier covered transaction”, “participant”, “person”, “primary covered transaction”, “principal”, “proposal”, and “voluntarily excluded”, as used in this cause, have the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of rules implementing Executive Order 12549. You may contact the person to whom this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.
5. The prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is debarred, suspended, disqualified, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the DOL.
6. The prospective recipient of Federal assistance funds agrees by submitting this pro posal, that it will include the clause title “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction” unless it knows that the certification is erroneous.
7. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.
8. Except for transactions auth orized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntary excluded from participation in this transact ion, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the DOL may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment.
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF SANTA ANA
(Refer to the following Forms)
ATTACHMENT K
FEDERAL FUNDING REQUIREMENTS – CALTRANS FORMS
EXHIBIT 2
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information