Agenda packet, first session — Santa Barbara City Council, February 13, 2024 (part 2 of 3)

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 incident. Once the collision happened, the operator backed up in the south direction and avoided the lift. He then proceeded to place the gate along the east wall on the east side of the hallway and continued with his standard work practice. No other work was being executed in the immediate area of the incident and no personnel of any involved party were harmed/injured during the incident.

Employee Statements:

Heriberto Moreno: On 8/28/23 around 15:30 Mr. Moreno was asked to come to the ADF operations office to discuss the incident. Upon inquiry of the events that transpired earlier that morning, Mr. Moreno explained how upon opening the primary fermenter door, he was overwhelmed by the flooding water from the fermenter into the hallway. He expressed how this flooding event caused a change of thought process that made him respond immediately to the safety concerns of Mr. Apolinar Flores, his assisting personnel with the task at hand. As explained, he then forgot about the placement of the aerial lift as he lifted and hauled the fermentor gate. Once in motion, he stated his focus was on not colliding with the decompacter in his left peripheral view. This is when he said he felt the collision of the gate and aerial lift and immediately stopped to prevent further damage.

Abelardo Melgoza: On 8/28/23 around 16:00, Mr. Melgoza was asked to come to the ADF operations office to discuss the reason for the aerial lift being left in the digestor hallway. Mr. Melgoza was the last operator to utilize the aerial lift coinciding with the task of using the lift to reach electronic devices located around the perimeter of the fermenter door. A contractor for SCADA consulting by the entity name 'SPICE Integration' was on site Friday 8/25/23 for the reason of troubleshooting various door switches. Mr. Melgoza was instructed to facilitate SPICE personnel in executing this task. Mr. Melgoza stated the aerial lift was left in place over the weekend and was not removed from the facility's hallway due to mechanical issues. He then relayed how the machine was "giving out" several times as they were performing their work.

Inspection Findings of Incident:

The lift was struck around the operator's basket. The left side 'guardrails' of the basket suffered sufficient damage. Other discovered damages to the lift include 'power track hose', 'cable carrier' and steel attachment brackets at the connection points. All of which are between the primary extension arm and auxiliary articulating arm. The lift currently remains in the same position due to the inability to safely operate the lift. The lift itself was also found to be subpar in regards to safety requirements. Further, the lift in its entirety, is painted black with no reflectors present anywhere on the equipment.

After visiting the location of the incident, a concern arose over the visibility in the Employee Incident Report #082823001
Page2
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 1 Jeanette Gonzales-Knight
From: Barcelona, Shannon
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2023 5:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Gonzales-Knight, Jeanette; Spier, Travis; Wilder, Marty; Johnston, Carlyle; Milligan, Gregory; Menzies, Jonathan; Dimock, Ed; McGolpin, Scott; Hagen, Julie
Subject: Notice of Health & Safety Violations & Opportunity to Cure for the Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project
Attachments: MSB H S ltr Final.docx; Image.jpeg; 46.jpg; 24.jpg; 12.jpg; 48.jpg; 25.jpg; 26.jpg; 69.jpg; 10.jpg; 33.jpg;

80.jpg; 21.jpg
Importance: High
Hi John,
Please review the attached notice of Health and Safety Violations that were noted at our recent tour of the ADF.

Please have these violations corrected within 15 days.

The additional violations regarding the Hazcom labeling on the chemical storage tanks has been addressed with Diani in a separate communication.

If you have any question, please contact me.

Thank you,
Shannon Barcelona
Santa Barbara County Public Works
Safety, Disability, and Risk Manager
123 E. Anapamu Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
(805) 568‐3307
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA SCOTT D. MCGOLPIN
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Director
123 East Anapamu Street
Santa Barbara, California 93101
(805) 568-3000
AA/EEO Employer
Julie A. Hagen, Deputy Director Chris Sneddon, Deputy Director Leslie Wells, Deputy Director Walter Rubalcava, Deputy Director Aleksandar Jevremovic, County Surveyor John Dewey, CEO & Managing Member [US mail and emailed] MSB Investors, LLC
17 Corporate Plaza, Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Email: [email protected]
Subject: Notice of Health and Safety Violations and Opportunity to Cure for the Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project
Mr. John Dewey,
This letter is to bring to your attention the following Health & Safety deficiencies of MSB Investors, LLC (MSB) under the Agreement between MSB and the County of Santa Barbara (County) for the Development and Operation of the Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project (Project), also referred to as the ReSource Center. The performance issues include failure to ensure the health and safety of all personnel working and persons visiting the Project site, in accordance with Section 5.7, and are listed but limited to the itemized deficiencies below. Pursuant to Section 14.2.B, MSB is required to commence the cure within 2 days of receipt of this letter and complete the cure within 15 days.

The following is a list of defaults observed at the ReSource Center on May 30, 2023:

1. Signs stating “No Parking Anytime Emergency Vehicle Access” in the fire access lanes and “no parking anytime” should also be placed in access lane, in the turnaround area, and by the hydrants at the Anaerobic Digestion Facility (ADF) in accordance with the attached County Fire Apparatus Access standard.

2. Per your statement on 06/08/2023, the storage tanks containing CMU runoff and ADF percolate that are blocking access to hydrants and fire lanes will be moved no later than 06/14/2023.

3. Only 1 mounted fire extinguisher was observed at the ADF, however, the tag was torn and inspection/recharge date was accessible; and 1 extinguisher was observed on the ground and not suitably charged. These must be addressed in addition to adding at least 2 more mounted extinguishers on the front/side of the ADF, 1 on the back side of the ADF, and 1 on top of the ADF near the entrance.

4. The truck and loader that were parked in the fire turnout lane need to be moved and no vehicles shall be staged in this area impeding emergency Access. No Parking signage must be posted.

5. An unauthorized employee breakroom / area was observed blocking fire access and cannot be constructed without County approval.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA SCOTT D. MCGOLPIN
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Director
123 East Anapamu Street
Santa Barbara, California 93101
(805) 568-3000
AA/EEO Employer
Julie A. Hagen, Deputy Director Chris Sneddon, Deputy Director Leslie Wells, Deputy Director Walter Rubalcava, Deputy Director Aleksandar Jevremovic, County Surveyor

6. The drum of combustible material that is stored outside of the ADF needs to be placed in a secure location with secondary containment and proper hazardous communication labeling.

The above list of health and safety deficiencies are the most egregious items that were noted during our site visit and need immediate attention, and another letter containing less egregious deficiencies will follow at a later date. Photos captured during the site visit are included for your reference.

Please contact me with questions.

Thank you,
Shannon Barcelona
Santa Barbara County
Public Works Safety, Disability & Risk Manager
(805) 568-3307
Enclosures
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B9
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA SCOTT D. MCGOLPIN
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Director
123 East Anapamu Street
Santa Barbara, California 93101
(805) 568-3000
AA/EEO Employer
Julie A. Hagen, Deputy Director Chris Sneddon, Deputy Director Jeanette Gonzales-Knight, Interim Deputy Director Walter Rubalcava, Deputy Director Aleksandar Jevremovic, County Surveyor Martin J Wilder, Interim Deputy Director John Dewey, CEO & Managing Member [US mail and emailed] MSB Investors, LLC
17 Corporate Plaza, Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Email: [email protected]
October 6, 2023
Subject: Notice of Health and Safety Violations and Opportunity to Cure for the Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project
Mr. John Dewey,
This letter is to bring to your attention the following Health & Safety deficiencies of MSB Investors, LLC (MSB) under the Agreement between MSB and the County of Santa Barbara (County) for the Development and Operation of the Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project (Project), also referred to as the ReSource Center. The performance issues include failure to ensure the health and safety of all personnel working and persons visiting the Project site, and failure to ensure safe and orderly vehicular movement, in accordance with Section 5.7, and are listed but not limited to the itemized deficiencies below. Pursuant to Section 14.2.B, MSB is required to commence the cure within 2 days of receipt of this letter and complete the cure within 15 days.

It has been noted that you have cured most of the Safety Violations listed in my previous letter referencing the May 30, 2023 site inspection however additional violations were noted on my most recent visit.

The following is a list of defaults observed at the ReSource Center on September 18, 2023:

1. Signs stating “No Parking Anytime Emergency Vehicle Access” in the fire access lanes and “no parking anytime” are posted however there was a vehicle with a pop-up travel trailer towed behind and an Aerial Lift parked in two separate location in front of no parking signs. Pictures are attached. Not only do signs need to be placed, the no parking needs to be enforced. As fire hazards occur, there shall be no delay in providing the necessary fire protection and/or prevention equipment. NOTE: In cases where orders of local jurisdiction are more restrictive, those orders shall prevail. (b) A safe and unobstructed access to all available firefighting equipment shall be maintained at all times. Section 142.3, Labor Code. Reference: Section 142.3, Labor Code.

2. The storage tanks containing CMU runoff and ADF percolate were moved to the CMU deck the tank doors are open on multiple tanks. The tanks need to remain closed when material is inside.

3. The mounted fire extinguisher was observed at the ADF, the tag on the extinguisher shows the last inspection was in 2022. Firefighting equipment shall be inspected and tested, and maintained in serviceable condition. A record shall be kept showing the date when fire extinguishers were last DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA SCOTT D. MCGOLPIN
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Director
123 East Anapamu Street
Santa Barbara, California 93101
(805) 568-3000
AA/EEO Employer
Julie A. Hagen, Deputy Director Chris Sneddon, Deputy Director Jeanette Gonzales-Knight, Interim Deputy Director Walter Rubalcava, Deputy Director Aleksandar Jevremovic, County Surveyor Martin J Wilder, Interim Deputy Director inspected, tested or recharged. Section 142.3, Labor Code. Reference: Section 142.3, Labor Code.

4. A bottle of Diesel Exhaust Fluid that had liquid inside was on the ground outside one of the storage tanks on the CMU deck. Containers of hazardous substances shall not be stored in such locations or manner as to result in physical damage to, or deterioration of the container.

Containers shall not be stored where they are exposed to heat sufficient to rupture the container or cause leakage, Section 142.3, Labor Code. Reference: Section 142.3, Labor Code. Group

5. Tarps are on the deck, creating a potential snake/rodent hazard. The employer must provide, and ensure each employee uses, a safe means of access and egress to and from walking-working surfaces. 1910.22(c) Access and egress.

6. Storage container doors are left open and debris is blowing out.

7. The lights inside the digester are not adequate, you cannot clearly see vehicles or people who may be working inside. You recently had a Loader vs Aerial lift accident inside the facility, it was also noted that the Aerial Lift involved in the accident was black with no reflectors or lights on it, the use of this vehicle inside a poorly lit area is clearly a contributing factor of the accident. (a) Working areas, stairways, aisles, passageways, work benches and machines shall be provided with either natural or artificial illumination which is adequate and suitable to provide a reasonably safe place of employment. b) When adequate natural illumination or permanent artificial illumination cannot be made available to secure the safety of employees, suitable portable lights shall be provided. (c) Skylights, side windows, lamps, and other light accessories which provide necessary illumination shall be kept sufficiently clean, adjusted, and repaired so as not to impair the illumination required for the safety of employees. Minimum illumination levels for safety alone are listed for various typical areas in Table IL-1. (Title 24, Part 2, Section 512, Table 5-C.)

8. A large battery was stored on the Aerial Lift exposed to the elements. Containers of hazardous substances shall not be stored in such locations or manner as to result in physical damage to, or deterioration of the container. Containers shall not be stored where they are exposed to heat sufficient to rupture the container or cause leakage, Section 142.3, Labor Code. Reference:

Section 142.3, Labor Code.

9. A No Parking/Emergency Vehicles only sign has yet to be placed on the fire access/turn around area. This was a requirement in the May 30th letter and has yet to be cured. The employer shall be responsible for the development of a fire protection program to be followed throughout all phases of the construction work; and he shall provide for the firefighting equipment as specified in this Article. As fire hazards occur, there shall be no delay in providing the necessary fire protection and/or prevention equipment. NOTE: In cases where orders of local jurisdiction are more restrictive, those orders shall prevail. (b) A safe and unobstructed access to all available firefighting equipment shall be maintained at all times. Reference: Section 142.3, Labor Code.

10. The Hazcom label is faded and peeling on a barrel of material that could not be identified. This was a requirement in the May 30th letter and has yet to be cured. An appropriate group of written, printed or graphic information elements concerning a hazardous chemical that is affixed to, printed on, or attached to the immediate container of a hazardous chemical, or to the outside DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA SCOTT D. MCGOLPIN
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Director
123 East Anapamu Street
Santa Barbara, California 93101
(805) 568-3000
AA/EEO Employer
Julie A. Hagen, Deputy Director Chris Sneddon, Deputy Director Jeanette Gonzales-Knight, Interim Deputy Director Walter Rubalcava, Deputy Director Aleksandar Jevremovic, County Surveyor Martin J Wilder, Interim Deputy Director packaging. Authority cited: Sections 50.7, 142.3 and 6398, Labor Code. Reference: Sections

50.7, 142.3 and 6361-6399.7, Labor Code; Sections 25249.6, 25249.7, 25249.8, 25249.10, 25249.11, 25249.12 and 25249.13, Health and Safety Code.

11. CMU run-off / wastewater is being transported from the CMU Run-off Storage Tank to the ADF Percolate Tank by allowing the outflow from a pipe above the ADF doors to hit the ADF tipping area and drain into the ADF sump, potentially exposing employees and visitors entering the ADF to come in contact with untreated wastewater.

12. The entire facilities housekeeping is poor, there are piles of used parts, trash, and other items left in piles throughout. There is garbage and debris blowing up and down the hillside. Dumpsters located on the CMU deck have been left to sit long enough for foliage to start to grow on top of the contents of the container.

13. The ADF fire suppression system is corroded and leaking in four locations. (2) If for any reason a fixed extinguishing system becomes inoperable, the employer shall notify employees and take the necessary temporary precautions to assure their safety until the system is restored to operating order. Any defects or impairments shall be properly corrected by trained personnel. Section 142.3, Labor Code
The above list of health and safety deficiencies were noted during our site visits and require immediate attention. In addition to items noted above, a vehicular accident occurred on September 19, 2023 between a refueling truck and CMU loader. An incident report documenting the incident was received on September 26, 2023 and is being reviewed, however we require that all accidents/incidents are reported to us and this has not been the case on previous accidents at the facility.

Photos captured during the site visit are included for your reference.

Per article 5 of your contract, please provide a copy of your Employee Health & Safety Plan Handbook, verification of OSHA/Cal OSHA training for your staff and verification of staff safety training, and copies of your monthly IIPP site inspections.

Please contact me with questions.

Thank you,
Shannon Barcelona
Santa Barbara County
Public Works Safety, Disability & Risk Manager
(805) 568-3307
Enclosures
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9

JOHN KULAR CONSULTING
890 Lindamere Ct.

Simi Valley, CA 93065
661.302.1292
www.kularconsult.com
Attachments: SCADA Exhibits of tank levels
Figure 1- Locations of Fire Damaged Storm Drain
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9

EXHIBIT A - POTABLE & FIRE WATER TANK
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 100% = 19.10'

95.47%=18.23'

77.05%=14.72'
DELTA = 3.51'

3.51 ' X 4597 GAL/FT =16,135 GALLONS

EXHBIT B - FIRE WATER TANK STATUS
MAY 12 - MAY 13, 2022
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9

EXHIBIT C - STORMWATER STORAGE CHANGES
MAY 12 - 13, 2022 20% INCREASE = 4437 GALLONS/TANK CMU TANK 38%= 144389 GALLONS

BAKER TANK B

BAKER TANK A

CMU SWM TANK
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9

ATTACHMENT C
Notices of Violations
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Healthy people, healthy community, healthy environment.

Environmental Health Services
225 Camino del Remedio  Santa Barbara, CA 93110
805/681-4900  FAX 805/681-4901
2125 S. Centerpointe Pkwy. #333  Santa Maria, CA 93455-1340 805/346-8460  FAX 805/346-8485
Lars Seifert Director of Environmental Health

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
NOTICE OF VIOLATION December 1, 2022
Name: Anaerobic Digestor Facility (ADF) and Compost Management Unit Manager Name: John Dewey (CMU) at Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project & Sanitary Landfill (42-AA-0015)
Address: 14470 Calle Real Address: 14470 Calle Real
Goleta, CA 93117 Goleta, CA 93117
Violation Location: Tajiguas Landfill and Resource Ctr. APN: 081-150-019 14470 Calle Real
Goleta, CA 93117

Code Title Description
Title 14 California Code of
Regulations (CCR) § 17863.4
Odor Impact Minimization Plan Occurrence of odor impacts and failure to implement procedures established in
operator’s odor impact minimization plan
(OIMP).
14 CCR § 17867(2) Odor Control Operation of facility, including not following procedures established in operator’s OIMP that
has been and is creating odor and nuisance
conditions off-site.
14 CCR § 17867(3) Vector/Litter/Hazard/Nuisance/Noise/Dust Observation of litter in areas surrounding CMU and complaints that litter drifts off-site to Arroyo
Quemada Lane and the Pacific Ocean.
14 CCR § 17896.31 Odor Minimization Plan Operation of facility, including not following procedures established in operator’s OIMP that
has been and is creating odor and nuisance
conditions off-site.
14 CCR § 17896.32 Odor and Nuisance Control Occurrence of odor impacts and failure to implement procedures established in
operator’s OIMP.

Warning notice dates of violations, as noted on inspection reports for SWIS Facility Number 42-AA-0015 inspected on: September 21, October 19 and November 2, 2022.

In order to comply with the above-mentioned code sections, you must meet the following compliance schedule:

1. Immediately implement all procedures as described in the facility’s Odor Impact Minimization Plan, including sections identified in EHS inspection reports for the November 2, 2022 inspection.

Daniel L. B. Nielson, MPA Interim Director
Suzanne Jacobson, CPA Chief Financial Officer
Paige Batson, MA, PHN, RN Deputy Director
Darrin Eisenbarth Deputy Director
Dana Gamble, LCSW Deputy Director
Dr. Noemi Doohan Medical Director

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 NOV – ADF and CMU operations at 42-AA-0015
December 1, 2022

Page 2 of 2 ends

Healthy people, healthy community, healthy environment.

2. Continue implementation of mitigations and schedule as proposed in section E of the submitted November 4, 2022 Odor Best Management Practice Feasibility Study. Environmental Health Services (EHS) is currently consulting with CalRecycle and will formally respond upon completion of review and consultation.

3. Immediately implement procedures to minimize the production of litter from site activities, and complete at least daily site walk-throughs to identify and remove litter.

You may contest this Notice of Violation by providing a written response within the next two weeks (December 15, 2022) to: Norma Campos Bernal at 225 Camino del Remedio, Santa Barbara, CA 93110; [email protected].

Failure to comply with above compliance schedule may result in further enforcement action, such as the issuance of a notice and order. Please provide your availability for the next 30 days, to arrange a Compliance Meeting with EHS’ Director for plans to resolve the ongoing violations. If you have any questions please contact Norma Campos Bernal at (805) 681-4942.

Sincerely,
Norma Campos Bernal, REHS
Senior Environmental Health Specialist
Cc: Regional Water Quality Control Board
Leslie Wells, Public Works Deputy Director
Jeanette Gonzales-Knight, RRWMD Compliance Manager
Enclosures:

ADF Inspection Report for inspection on November 2, 2022 CMU Inspection Report for inspection on November 2, 2022 ADF Inspection Report for inspection on October 19, 2022 CMU Inspection Report for inspection on October 19, 2022 ADF Inspection Report for inspection on September 21, 2022 CMU Inspection Report for inspection on September 21, 2022 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Inspection Information
Inspected By: Santa Barbara County Local Inspection ID:

Inspection Date: 9/21/2022 Time In: 2:30 PM
Inspection Type: Periodic Time Out: 3:00 PM
Inspector: Norma Campos Bernal Inspection Duration: 1/2 hour Operator: County Of Santa Barbara Public Works Dep
Received By: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Also Present (Name):

Facility/Activity Information
Enforcement Agency: County of Santa Barbara SWIS Number: 42-AA-0015 Facility: Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF
14470 Calle Real
Goleta, CA 93117
Activity: Composting Facility (Mixed)
Operational Status: Active Regulatory Status: Permitted Land Owners(s):

County Of Santa Barbara Public Works Dep
The above facility was inspected for compliance with applicable sections of Division 30 of the Public Resources Code (PRC) and Title 14 and Title 27, California Code of Regulations (CCR).

Violations
14 CCR 17869(c) - Public Complaints
Failure to document complaints including in special occurrence log received from multiple Arroyo Quemada residents since Fourth Quarter of 2021 and more specifically noted in odor correspondence on between CMU/ADF Manager and Arroyo Quemada residents in 2022 on March 12, 13, 16, April 8 and 23, June 16 and 17, August 5-12 and 26 and September 14-16 and 20.

Offsite odor confirmed by LEA during 8/23/22 inspection and also during this inspection on 9/21/22.
14 CCR 17867(a)(3) - Vectors/Litter/Hazard/Nuisance/Noise/Dust RP provided one of the many pieces of plastic that drift off-site and end up at Arroyo Compostable Materials Handling Operation and Facility Inspection Report (93)
Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
9/21/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 1 of 4 Date Generated: October 26, 2022 4:03 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Quemada and the Pacific Ocean.

Litter at operations and facilities shall be controlled, and routinely collected to prevent safety hazards, nuisances or similar problems and off-site migration to the greatest extent possible given existing weather conditions.

Actions should be taken immediately to return to compliance with State standards. 14 CCR 17863.4 - Odor Impact Minimization Plan
Failure to comply with OIMP, including following complaint response protocol as noted by recurring odor complaints on the following dates; March 12, 13, 16, April 8 and 23, June 16 and 17, August 5-12 and 26 and September 14-16 and 20. Operator to immediately take additional reasonable and feasible measures to minimize and control nuisance odor impacts offsite.

Please refer to attachments for additional information.

Areas of Concern
14 CCR 17868.5(c) - Personnel Training
Two employees at the CMU have not been trained to identify contaminants, unacceptable feedstock, or other hazardous materials that may be present in loads. Operator to ensure facility personnel are adequately trained to perform load Compostable Materials Handling Operation and Facility Inspection Report (93)
Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
9/21/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 2 of 4 Date Generated: October 26, 2022 4:03 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 checking activities, including hazardous material awareness training.

Inspection Report Comments
Weather: Sunny, 79F and westerly winds at 9 mph
Compost Management Unit (CMU) Monthly Inspection:
-Lab results on compost pathogens was not available due to low stock of compost. -Noted 18 windrows of compost undergoing curing process on the CMU floor this day. -Noted a section of the chain link fence was missing and informed by operator that SCS Engineers are in the process of installing new LFG well head, but operator received notification that it would be repaired by the October inspection.
-Operator provided daily temperature monitoring records for middle portion of the windrows at the CMU as well as load check, tonnage reports and updated training records. -Operator explained that the digestor temperatures have been adjusted to a mesophilic temperature (105F), since using thermophilic temps (145F) may have been contributing to the increase in odors. -LEA responded to odor complaint by conducting an odor survey from Arroyo Quemada Lane in the evening after Tajiguas inspections between 6:30 pm and 7:30 pm. The weather was 69F and clear with a wind at 6 mph in a westerly direction and LEA noticed an odor in the area by the Arroyo Quemada Lane entrance gate which resembled a terpene odor with a musty, stale scent most likely from the green waste area. As I walked down the road I began to notice another odor resembling a more putrid odor most likely from the compost. The green waste odor was unpleasant and the compost odor was more offensive. Both odors were of moderate intensity with a duration that lasted overnight. According to Arroyo Quemada residents the frequency of these odors occur monthly for several days and have been a nuisance since the end of 2021. These odors would interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life. No other potential odor sources were identified except for operations at Tajiguas Sanitary Landfill and ReSource Center. During the inspection, the LEA was not made aware of any unusual operational changes or atypical feedstocks.
-EHS was first notified of complaints by the reporting party on August 18, 2022 although the operator and facility was made aware several months earlier.
-Provided operator a template for the Odor BMP Feasibility Report template to operator and attached instructions in this report.

Compostable Materials Handling Operation and Facility Inspection Report (93)
Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
9/21/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 3 of 4 Date Generated: October 26, 2022 4:03 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 -Employees must receive training in Hazardous Material Recognition and Awareness.

Notes:

1. Refer to violation from CCR14-Section 17867(a)(3)-Litter

2. Refer to violation from CCR14-Section 17863.4-Odor Minimization Plan

3. Refer to violation from CCR14-Section 17869(c)-Public Complaint

4. Refer to AOC from CCR14-Sectiion 14 CCR 17868.5(c)-Employee Training

5. Provide organics sampling dates for third and fourth quarters, 2022.

6. Repair chain link enclosure.

7. Next Five-Year Review application will be due on February 2, 2027.

Attachments
Odor BMP Instructions
Compostable Materials Handling Operation and Facility Inspection Report (93)
Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
9/21/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 4 of 4 Date Generated: October 26, 2022 4:03 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Inspection Information
Inspected By: Santa Barbara County Local Inspection ID:

Inspection Date: 9/21/2022 Time In: 1:30 PM
Inspection Type: Periodic Time Out: 2:30 PM
Inspector: Norma Campos Bernal Inspection Duration: 1 hour Operator: County Of Santa Barbara Public Works Dep
Received By: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Also Present (Name):

Facility/Activity Information
Enforcement Agency: County of Santa Barbara SWIS Number: 42-AA-0015 Facility: Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF
14470 Calle Real
Goleta, CA 93117
Activity: Large Volume In-Vessel Digestion Facility
Operational Status: Active Regulatory Status: Permitted Land Owners(s):

Violations
14 CCR 17896.45 - Record Keeping Requirements
Failure to document complaint in special occurrences log for occurrences noted in correspondence provided by reporting parties in 2022 for the following dates; March 12, 13 and 16, April 8 and 23, June 16 and 17, August 5-12 and 26 and September 14- 16 and 20. Off-site odor confirmed by LEA during 8/23/22 inspection and also during this inspection on September 21, 2022.
14 CCR 17896.31 - Odor Minimization Plan
Failure to comply with OIMP, including following complaint response protocol as noted by recurring odor complaints on the following dates; March 12, 13, 16, April 8 and 23, June 16 and 17, August 5-12 and 26 and September 14-16 and 20. Operator to immediately take additional reasonable and feasible measures to minimize and control In-Vessel Digestion Operation and Facility Inspection Report (104) Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
9/21/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 1 of 3 Date Generated: October 27, 2022 2:43 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 nuisance odor impacts offsite.

Please refer to attachments for additional information.

14 CCR 17896.19 - Biogas Control
As noted by the following communication between the operator and a neighbor, an uncontrolled release of biogas occurred:
"As a result of our transition from thermophilic (high temperature) to mesophilic (low temperature) AD conditions in order to reduce odors, the methane content of the gas increased above 50% last night for the first time since last March exceeding the engine’s operating setpoint. This caused an engine shutdown and sent the biogas to the flare.

The flare operated as expected. Unfortunately, a scrubber prior to the flare would only let 2/3’s of the biogas through the scrubber due to some material buildup that was discovered this morning. The balance of the biogas was vented." We are in the process of revising the engine setpoint to accommodate the current methane content of the biogas and performing maintenance on the scrubber to correct that condition so it operates normally."
copied from email correspondence between complainant and John Dewey.

No Areas of Concern
Inspection Report Comments
Weather: Sunny, 79F and westerly winds at 9 mph
Anaerobic Digestion Facility (ADF) Monthly Inspection:
-Noted piles of Source Separated Organics (SSO), Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW) from the In-Vessel Digestion Operation and Facility Inspection Report (104) Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
9/21/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 2 of 3 Date Generated: October 27, 2022 2:43 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 MRF.
-Both eye-wash stations and showers were operating adequately. -Hazardous Material container 5-gallon drum provided in ADF hall, pending start of accumulation date. -August load checks and tonnage reports were all adequate at this time, but special occurrences were inaccurate and missing complaint information.
-LEA responded to odor complaint by conducting an odor survey from Arroyo Quemada Lane in the evening after Tajiguas inspections between 6:30 pm and 7:30 pm. The weather was 69F and clear with a wind at 6 mph in a westerly direction and LEA noticed an odor in the area by the Arroyo Quemada Lane entrance gate which resembled a terpene odor with a musty, stale scent most likely from the green waste area. As I walked down the road I began to notice another odor resembling a more putrid odor most likely from the compost. The green waste odor was unpleasant and the compost odor was more offensive. Both odors were of moderate intensity with a duration that lasted overnight. According to Arroyo Quemada residents the frequency of these odors occur monthly for several days and have been a nuisance since the end of 2021. These odors would interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life. No other potential odor sources were identified except for operations at Tajiguas Sanitary Landfill and ReSource Center. During the inspection, the LEA was not made aware of any unusual operational changes or atypical feedstocks.
-EHS was first notified of complaints by the reporting party on August 18, 2022 although the operator and facility was made aware several months earlier.
-Provided a template for the Odor BMP Feasibility Report template to operator and attached instructions in this report.
-Actions should be taken immediately to return to compliance with State standards for controlling off-site litter.

Notes:

1. Refer to violation from CCR14-Section 17896.19-Biogas Control

2. Refer to violation from CCR14-Section 17896.31-Odor Minimization Plan

3. Refer to violation from CCR14-Section 17896.45-Recordkeeping Requirements

4. Provide organics sampling dates for third and fourth quarters, 2022.

5. Next Five-Year Review application will be due on February 2, 2027.

Attachments
Instructions for completing the Odor BMP Feasibility Report Tajiguas Sanitary LF and Resource Center
In-Vessel Digestion Operation and Facility Inspection Report (104) Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
9/21/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 3 of 3 Date Generated: October 27, 2022 2:43 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Inspection Information
Inspected By: Santa Barbara County Local Inspection ID:

Inspection Date: 10/19/2022 Time In: 1:00 PM
Inspection Type: Periodic Time Out: 2:00 PM
Inspector: Norma Campos Bernal Inspection Duration: 1 hour Operator: County Of Santa Barbara Public Works Dep
Received By: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Also Present (Name):

Aimee Long, APCD
Facility/Activity Information
Enforcement Agency: County of Santa Barbara SWIS Number: 42-AA-0015 Facility: Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF
14470 Calle Real
Goleta, CA 93117
Activity: Composting Facility (Mixed)
Operational Status: Active Regulatory Status: Permitted Land Owners(s):

Violations
14 CCR 17863.4 - Odor Impact Minimization Plan
Failure to comply with OIMP, including following complaint response protocol as noted by recurring odor complaints on the following dates; March 12, 13, 16, April 8 and 23, June 16 and 17, August 5-12 and 26 and September 14-16 and 20 and continuing through the month of October, 2022.

Operator to immediately take additional reasonable and feasible measures to minimize and control nuisance odor impacts offsite.

Based on an odor investigation completed by the LEA consistent with 14 CCR 18302(d), and continuing odor complaints by residents at Arroyo Quemada Lane that have been unresolved through design and operating considerations identified in the facility’s Odor Impact Minimization Plan, the operator is directed to prepare and implement an Odor Best Management Practice Feasibility report (14CCR-17896.30) to identify Best Management Practices and develop new odor control methods by no later than November 4, 2022 (within 45 days of this inspection). The Odor Best Management Practice Feasibility Report should Compostable Materials Handling Operation and Facility Inspection Report (93)
Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
10/19/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 1 of 3 Date Generated: November 10, 2022 3:41 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 include the required elements of 14 CCR 17896.30 (b).

14 CCR 17863 - Report of Composting Site Information
-Operator provided estimated volume of finished compost ready for screening to be at 12,000 cubic yards (16,800 tons) which exceeds design capacity cited in JTD Appendix N.

Provide proposal to immediately reduce the current compost volume to be under capacity within design parameters.

Areas of Concern
14 CCR 17867.5 - Personnel Training
Two employees at the CMU have not been trained to identify contaminants, unacceptable feedstock or other hazardous materials that may be present in loads. Operator to ensure facility personnel are adequately trained to perform load checking activities, including hazardous material awareness training.

Inspection Report Comments
Weather: Sunny, 85F and south-easterly winds at 5 mph
Compost Management Unit (CMU) Monthly Inspection:
-Pathogen reduction lab results from October5, 2022 for finished compost passed for Fecal Coliform and Salmonella.
-Noted 17 windrows of compost undergoing curing process on the CMU floor this day. -Noted a section of the chain link fence was missing and informed by operator that the fence company has been Compostable Materials Handling Operation and Facility Inspection Report (93)
Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
10/19/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 2 of 3 Date Generated: November 10, 2022 3:41 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 delayed, but work order is approved and proposed to be completed by next inspection. -Noted damage to enclosure on ADF facing side. (picture) -Noted ponding of liquid near clogged drain. (pictures) -Operator provided daily temperature monitoring records for middle portion of the windrows at the CMU as well as September load checks, tonnage reports and updated training records. -Provided operator a template for the Odor BMP Feasibility Report template to operator and attached instructions in this report due by November 4, 2022.
-Employees must receive training in Hazardous Material Recognition and Awareness.

Notes:

1. Refer to violation from 14CCR 17863-failure to comply with RCSI ( Report of Composting Site Information).

2. Refer to violation from 14CCR 17896.31-Odor Minimization Plan

3. Refer to AOC from CCR14-Section 14 CCR 17868.5(c)-Employee Training

4. Provide organics sampling dates for third and fourth quarters, 2022.

5. Repair chain link enclosure on landfill side and also on ADF side.

6. Unclog the main drain on the CMU floor to drain liquid.

7. Next Five-Year Review application will be due on February 2, 2027.

Attachments
cmu drain clogg
enclosure on LF side and ponding of waste water
secondary damage to CMU enclosure
Compostable Materials Handling Operation and Facility Inspection Report (93)
Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
10/19/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 3 of 3 Date Generated: November 10, 2022 3:41 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Inspection Information
Inspected By: Santa Barbara County Local Inspection ID:

Inspection Date: 10/19/2022 Time In: 2:00 PM
Inspection Type: Periodic Time Out: 2:30 PM
Inspector: Norma Campos Bernal Inspection Duration: 1/2 hour Operator: County Of Santa Barbara Public Works Dep
Received By: [email protected]; [email protected]
Also Present (Name):

Aimee Long, APCD
Facility/Activity Information
Enforcement Agency: County of Santa Barbara SWIS Number: 42-AA-0015 Facility: Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF
14470 Calle Real
Goleta, CA 93117
Activity: Large Volume In-Vessel Digestion Facility
Operational Status: Active Regulatory Status: Permitted Land Owners(s):

Violations
PRC 44014(b) - Operator Complies with Terms & Conditions Operator provided estimated volume of finished compost ready for screening to be at 12,000 cubic yards (16,800 tons) which exceeds design capacity cited in JTD Appendix N.

Provide proposal to immediately reduce the current compost volume to be under capacity within design parameters to comply with permit terms and conditions.

In-Vessel Digestion Operation and Facility Inspection Report (104) Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
10/19/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 1 of 3 Date Generated: November 10, 2022 3:57 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 14 CCR 17896.31 - Odor Minimization Plan
Failure to comply with OIMP, including following complaint response protocol as noted by recurring odor complaints on the following dates; March 12, 13, 16, April 8 and 23, June 16 and 17, August 5-12 and 26 and September 14-16 and 20 and continuing through the month of October, 2022.

Operator to immediately take additional reasonable and feasible measures to minimize and control nuisance odor impacts offsite.

No Areas of Concern
Inspection Report Comments
Weather: Sunny, 85F and south-easterly winds at 5 mph
Anaerobic Digestion Facility (ADF) Monthly Inspection:
-Noted piles of Source Separated Organics (SSO), Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW) from the In-Vessel Digestion Operation and Facility Inspection Report (104) Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
10/19/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 2 of 3 Date Generated: November 10, 2022 3:57 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 MRF.
-Both eye-wash stations and showers were operating adequately. -Noted misters were not operating during today's inspection. -Noted maintenance occurring on malfunctioning engine chiller. (picture) -Hazardous Material container 5-gallon drum provided in ADF hall, pending start of accumulation date. -September load checks and tonnage reports were all adequate at this time, but special occurrences were inaccurate and missing complaint information.
-Submit the Odor BMP Feasibility Report by deadline of November 4, 2022. -Actions should be taken immediately to return to compliance with State standards for controlling off-site litter.

Notes:

1. Refer to violation for PRC 44014(b) for failure to comply with permit terms and conditions.

2. Refer to violation for CCR14-Section 17896.31-Odor Minimization Plan.

3. Provide organics sampling dates for third and fourth quarters, 2022.

4. Ensure misters are operating during business hours.

5. Next Five-Year Review application will be due on February 2, 2027.

Attachments
engine chiller maintenance
In-Vessel Digestion Operation and Facility Inspection Report (104) Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
10/19/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 3 of 3 Date Generated: November 10, 2022 3:57 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Inspection Information
Inspected By: Santa Barbara County Local Inspection ID:

Inspection Date: 11/2/2022 Time In: 1:30 PM
Inspection Type: Periodic Time Out: 2:00 PM
Inspector: Norma Campos Bernal Inspection Duration: 1/2 hour Operator: County Of Santa Barbara Public Works Dep
Received By: [email protected]; [email protected]
Also Present (Name):

Facility/Activity Information
Enforcement Agency: County of Santa Barbara SWIS Number: 42-AA-0015 Facility: Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF
14470 Calle Real
Goleta, CA 93117
Activity: Large Volume In-Vessel Digestion Facility
Operational Status: Active Regulatory Status: Permitted Land Owners(s):

Violations
14 CCR 17896.32 - Odor and Nuisance Control
Operation of facility, including not following procedures established in operator's OIMP, that has been and is creating odor and nuisance conditions off-site.

Additional complaints have been received by operator and/or LEA on October 3, 4, 8, 10, 12, 16-20, 23, 24, 25 and 29, additionally LEA received directly from Reporting Party on November 2, 4-7 and 15, 2022.
14 CCR 17896.31 - Odor Minimization Plan
Occurrence of odor impacts and failure to implement procedures established in operator's odor impact minimization plan (OIMP) including:

In-Vessel Digestion Operation and Facility Inspection Report (104) Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
11/2/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 1 of 3 Date Generated: December 1, 2022 3:32 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9

1. If it is determined possible odors impacts occurred, appropriate LEA and/or neighbors contact is made. (OIMP section 1.B )

2. Following complaint response protocol (OIMP section 3), including documentation in site Complaint Log and Special Occurrence Log and notification to LEA as noted by recurring odor complaints including on: March 12, 13, 16, April 8 and 23, June 16 and 17, August 5-12 and 26 and September 14-16 and 20, 2022.

3. Use of a misting system charged with flocculent and deodorizers to minimize the formation of odors and dust inside the building. (OIMP section 4)

Operator to immediately implement procedures established in operator's OIMP, and take additional reasonable and feasible measures (such as identified in submitted Odor Best Management Practice (BMP) Feasibility Report) to minimize and control nuisance odor impacts.

No Areas of Concern
Inspection Report Comments
Weather: Sunny, 63F and north-easterly winds at 18 mph

Anaerobic Digestion Facility (ADF) Monthly Inspection:

-Noted piles of Source Separated Organics (SSO), Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (OFMSW) from the MRF.

-Both eye-wash stations and showers were operating adequately.

-Noted misters were not operating during today's inspection.

-Hazardous Material container 5-gallon drum provided in ADF hall, pending start of accumulation date.

-Organics sampling submitted for third quarter for ADF.

-October load checks and tonnage reports were all adequate at this time, and special occurrences indicated complaint information.

-Operator submitted Odor Best Management Practice (BMP) Feasibility Report on November 4, 2022. LEA will formally respond to Odor BMP Feasibility report after consultation with CalRecycle in accordance with 14 CCR section 17896.30(d). The operator is encouraged to implement feasible measures to reduce and eliminate odors, as off-site odors are still occurring, including reports on October 3, 4, 8, 10, 12, 16-20, 23, 24, 25 and 29, and November 2, 4-7 and 15.

In-Vessel Digestion Operation and Facility Inspection Report (104) Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
11/2/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 2 of 3 Date Generated: December 1, 2022 3:32 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Notes:

1. Refer to violation for 14 CCR section 17896.31 Odor Minimization Plan.

2. Refer to violation for 14 CCR section 17896.32 Odor and Nuisance Control

3. Provide organics sampling dates for fourth quarter 2022.

4. Ensure misters are operating during business hours.

5. Next Five-Year Review application will be due on February 2, 2027.

No Attachments
In-Vessel Digestion Operation and Facility Inspection Report (104) Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
11/2/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 3 of 3 Date Generated: December 1, 2022 3:32 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Inspection Information
Inspected By: Santa Barbara County Local Inspection ID:

Inspection Date: 11/2/2022 Time In: 1:00 PM
Inspection Type: Periodic Time Out: 1:30 PM
Inspector: Norma Campos Bernal Inspection Duration: 1/2 hour Operator: County Of Santa Barbara Public Works Dep
Received By: [email protected]; [email protected]
Also Present (Name):

Violations
14 CCR 17867(a)(3) - Vectors/Litter/Hazard/Nuisance/Noise/Dust Continue to observe litter in areas surrounding CMU and have received complaints that litter continues to drift off-site to Arroyo Quemada and the Pacific Ocean.

Litter at operations and facilities shall be controlled, and routinely collected to minimize litter, nuisances; and minimizes human contact with, inhalation, ingestion, and transportation of dust, particulates, and pathogenic organisms.

Actions should be taken immediately to return to compliance with State standards. 14 CCR 17867(a)(2) - Odor Control
Operation of facility, including not following procedures established in operator's OIMP, Compostable Materials Handling Operation and Facility Inspection Report (93)
Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
11/2/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 1 of 3 Date Generated: December 1, 2022 3:12 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 that has been and is creating odor and nuisance conditions off-site. 14 CCR 17863.4 - Odor Impact Minimization Plan
Occurrence of odor impacts and failure to implement procedures established in operator's odor impact minimization plan (OIMP) including:

1. If it is determined possible odors impacts occurred, appropriate LEA and/or neighbors contact is made. (OIMP section 1.B )

3. Turning windrows to allow and retain greater porosity, dependent on wind patterns. (OIMP section 4.A.2. and 4.D)

4. Water added to maintain moisture content. (OIMP section 5.B)

5. Eliminating areas of standing water. (OIMP section 5.E)

6. Decrease pile size and expedite shipping finished compost to end user. (OIMP Table 1: ADF & CMU Sources of Odor and Possible Management Techniques)

No Areas of Concern
Inspection Report Comments
Weather: Sunny, 63F and north-easterly winds at 18 mph

Compost Management Unit (CMU) Monthly Inspection:

-Pathogen reduction lab results from October 5, 2022 for finished compost passed for Fecal Coliform and Salmonella.

-Noted 17 windrows of compost undergoing curing process on the CMU floor this day.

Finished compost storage pile(s) exceed storage volume and duration as facility was designed and have encroached on area envisioned for windrows in the curing process.

-Noted a section of the chain link fence was missing and informed by operator that the fence company has been delayed, but work order is approved and proposed to be completed by next inspection.

Compostable Materials Handling Operation and Facility Inspection Report (93)
Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
11/2/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 2 of 3 Date Generated: December 1, 2022 3:12 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9

-Organic sampling completed for third quarter.

-Noted damage to enclosure on ADF facing side. (picture)

-Operator provided daily temperature monitoring records for middle portion of the windrows at the CMU as well as October load checks, tonnage reports and updated training records.

-Operator submitted Odor Best Management Practice (BMP) Feasibility Report on November 4, 2022. LEA will formally respond to Odor BMP Feasibility report after consultation with CalRecycle in accordance with 14 CCR section 17863.4.1(d). The operator is encouraged to implement feasible measures to reduce and eliminate odors, as off-site odors are still occurring, including reports on October 3, 4, 8, 10, 12, 16-20, 23, 24, 25 and 29, and November 2, 4-7 and 15.

-Employees received training in Hazardous Material Recognition and Awareness.

Notes:

1. Refer to violation from 14 CCR section 17863.4 Odor Impact Minimization Plan

2. Refer to violation from 14 CCR section 17867(a)(2) Odor Control

3. Refer to violation from 14 CCR section 17867 (a)(3)
Vectors/Litter/Hazard/Nuisance/Noise/Dust

3. Provide organics sampling dates for fourth quarter, 2022.

4. Repair chain link enclosure on landfill side and also on ADF side.

5. Next Five-Year Review application will be due on February 2, 2027.

No Attachments
Compostable Materials Handling Operation and Facility Inspection Report (93)
Tajiguas Res Rec Proj & Sanitary LF (42-AA-0015)
11/2/2022
CalRecycle Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) Page 3 of 3 Date Generated: December 1, 2022 3:12 PM
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board
March 17, 2023

SENT VIA ELECTRONIC AND CERTIFIED MAIL
Certified Mail No. 7020 1810 0002 0768 1810
John Dewey
Chief Executive Officer
Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC
17 Corporate Plaza Drive, Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA 92660
[email protected]
Dear John Dewey,
ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM: TAJIGUAS COMPOST MANAGEMENT UNIT, SANTA BARBARA COUNTY – NOTICE OF VIOLATION
The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Coast Region (Central Coast Water Board) is a state regulatory agency with the responsibility for protecting the quality of the waters of the state within its area of jurisdiction. The Central Coast Water Board has authority to require submission of information, direct action, establish regulations, levy penalties, and bring legal action when necessary to protect water quality. The purpose of this letter is to notify Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC (Discharger) of alleged violations of state law at its Tajiguas Compost Management Unit (Facility) located at 14470 Calle Real in Goleta, require a written response describing the actions taken or planned to be taken to address violations and prevent future violations, and explain the potential civil administrative liability for non-compliance with state and federal laws, including unauthorized discharges of waste to waters of the state and waters of the United States.

Background
The Discharger is enrolled General Waste Discharge Requirements for Commercial Composting Operations Order 2020-0012-DWQ (Compost General Order). The Facility is also a postclosure land use at the Tajiguas Landfill, which is owned and operated by the County of Santa Barbara (County).

On June 11, 2021, the Central Coast Water Board issued the Discharger a notice of applicability (NOA) to enroll the Facility in the Compost General Order. The NOA included approval of the Discharger’s Water and Wastewater Management Plan, which is included in the Facility’s technical report. The approved Water and Wastewater Management Plan details operational procedures to prevent wastewater from DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Tajiguas Compost Management Unit - 2 - March 17, 2023
Notice of Violation
discharging from the Facility. The Compost General Order defines wastewater as “leachate or any other liquid flowing from, or on the working surface” and leachate as “any liquid formed by the drainage of liquids from, or percolation/flow of liquids through any feedstock, additive, amendment, or compost (active, curing, or final product) pile” (Compost General Order Attachment A). Due to concerns about the discharge of wastewater from the Facility based on previous inspections on December 5, 2022, and January 25, 2023, and from conversations with the Discharger and County staff, Central Coast Water Board staff conducted a Facility inspection on March 13, 2023.

Alleged Violations
Based on information provided by Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC staff and County staff and information from site inspections the Discharger has violated the following conditions of the Compost General Order at the Facility:

1. The Discharger has not managed wastewater in accordance with the Facility’s approved Water and Wastewater Management Plan, which is a violation of Compost General Order Specification 6. These violations include not implementing the following procedures included in the approved Water and Wastewater Management Plan:
a. The Water and Wastewater Management Plan indicates that before bypassing runoff from the compost working surface as clean stormwater, operators would first fully cover the compost with waterproof tarpaulins, place wattles between compost rows, and sweep the isles between windrows. During recent runoff diversion, the compost windrows and piles were not fully covered, the aisles were not fully swept to remove compost/waste from the exposed working surface areas, and wattles were not placed between all windrows. Thus, working surface runoff from the March 10, 2023, storm contacted compost/waste, which discharged from the Facility as wastewater. Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC staff and County staff indicated that this water was diverted during the March 10, 2023, storm to the north sedimentation basin, which ultimately discharged to Pila Creek.
b. The approved Water and Wastewater Management Plan indicates that wattles would be placed at the stormwater drainage inlets at all times. During the March 13, 2023, inspection there were no wattles surrounding the northern drainage inlet.
c. The approved Water and Wastewater Management Plan includes requirements to sample and test each time runoff is bypassed to the Landfill north sedimentation basin instead of being captured as wastewater within the onsite tanks. Based on conversations with Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC staff and County staff, samples were not taken during previous diversion events where water was discharged to the Landfill north sedimentation basin as required by the approved Water and Wastewater Management Plan, such as diversion DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Tajiguas Compost Management Unit - 3 - March 17, 2023
Notice of Violation
during the January 9, 2023, storm event. Another diversion event, where samples were not collected, occurred during the December 27-29, 2021 storm event, which was documented in the March 2022 Annual Report. Conversations with the Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC staff and County staff indicate that there may be additional bypass/discharges after work hours because there are no sensors, flow meters, or other triggers to alert operators of an overflow or bypass.

2. The Discharger has discharged waste (wastewater) to surface water (Pila Creek) without authorization from an NPDES permit. This is a violation of Compost General Order Prohibition 6. The Industrial General Permit (IGP) is a stormwater permit and does not authorize the discharge of wastewater, which is defined above. IGP requirements and potential violations are not discussed in this letter.

3. The Discharger discharged feedstock and compost outside of the designated composting operation areas that are specified in the technical report. This is a violation of Compost General Order Prohibition 1 and Specification 4. This includes compost found under the conveyer system that connects the anerobic digestion facility (ADF) to the compost Facility, as documented in the March 13, 2023, inspection report. This includes compost found on the densitometer table working surface area, which according to the approved technical report, was designed to include a berm surrounding the working surface to prevent compost impacted wastewater from discharging from the Facility. The lack of berm installation was documented by the Discharger in a February 8, 2023, report. Central Coast Water Board staff did not approve this report as an official technical report addendum and responded to the Discharger via email on February 8, 2023, indicating concerns about wastewater potentially discharging from this area. This correspondence as well as documentation of compost/waste on the densitometer table working surface, is included in the March 13, 2023, inspection report.

4. The Discharger has not maintained Facility berms in good working condition and has not prevented erosion and damage to the berms, as documented in recent inspection reports. This is a violation of Compost General Order Specification 10 and Maintenance Requirement 1.

5. The Discharger has not maintained the drainage conveyance systems to convey wastewater in a manner that prevents conditions resulting in contamination, pollution, or nuisance. The piping and connections that makes up the drainage conveyance system continues to leak wastewater to areas outside of the Facility, as documented in recent inspection reports. This is a violation of Compost General Order Specification 11.

6. The Discharger has not implemented sufficient corrective actions to address previous noncompliance, such as making timely and successful repairs or replacements to the wastewater/stormwater pipes. This is a violation of Compost General Order Additional Requirement 2.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Tajiguas Compost Management Unit - 4 - March 17, 2023
Notice of Violation

7. The Discharger has not adequately reported events of noncompliance or notified Central Coast Water Board of all Compost General Order violations, such as notification and reporting of wastewater discharges from the Facility, including the wastewater discharge resulting from the January 9, 2023, storm event. The Compost General Order includes reporting requirements including estimating the volume of wastewater when there is a discharge, which must be submitted in a report to Central Coast Water Board staff within 10 working days of noncompliance. This is a violation of Compost General Order Monitoring and Reporting section B.3 and Compost General Order Notification Requirement 4.

8. Facility feedstocks listed in the notice of intent and Technical Report are green material and anaerobic digestate. The Compost General Order requires that anerobic digestate be derived from allowable Tier 2 feedstocks. Additionally, the Compost General Order defines anerobic digestate as, “the solid portion of the material remaining after the anaerobic digestion of any combination of agricultural materials, biosolids, sewage sludge, food materials, green materials, manure, paper materials, or vegetative food materials. Dewatered digestate contains organic matter that may need to be further treated to stabilize it, usually through aerated composting.” The Compost General Order prohibits any feedstock, additive, or amendment other than those specifically described in the Compost General Order, unless approved by the Regional Water Board. Based on information provided by the Discharger via email on March 15, 2023, and presented in the March 13, 2023, inspection report including the March 15, 2023, email as attachment 1 and inspection photos, feedstock at the site contain significant amounts of inorganic contaminates including glass and plastics, which are not approved feedstocks, additives, or amendments, nor are these materials compostable. This is a violation of Compost General Order Prohibition 3 and 4 and Specification 7. The Discharger must comply with the Compost General Order and ensure that only approved feedstocks are stored and/or composted at the Facility. For a full list of approved Tier 1 and 2 feedstocks allowed in anerobic digestate, please see Compost General Order Table 2.”
Immediate corrective actions must be taken to address the violations listed above and actions must be taken to ensure that future operations meet the conditions of the Compost General Order and the approved Water and Wastewater Management Plan.

Requirements for Written Response to Alleged Violations The Discharger must address the alleged violations described above immediately and must submit by April 3, 2023, a written response describing the actions taken or planned to address the above alleged violations and prevent future violations. For violations that the Discharger has not addressed immediately, the response must include a time schedule for corrective actions to bring the compost Facility into compliance with the requirements of the Compost General Order.

Responses must be submitted electronically to: [email protected].

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Tajiguas Compost Management Unit - 5 - March 17, 2023
Notice of Violation
This notice of violation is intended to facilitate a timely remedy to address the Discharger’s alleged Compost General Order violations. Central Coast Water Board staff will determine the need to recommend further enforcement actions based upon the Discharger’s responses and future compliance with the Compost General Order.

Potential Administrative Civil Liability
The Discharger is hereby on notice that California Water Code (Water Code) section 13350 provides that any person who intentionally or negligently violates any conditions issued or amended by the Regional Water Board or State Water Board, is subject to administrative civil liability of up to $5,000 per day of violation or $10 per gallon of waste discharged. Alternatively, the superior court may impose civil liability for each violation of up to $15,000 per day or $20 per gallon of waste discharged.

The Discharger does not have a permit to discharge pollutants to waters of the United States. Unpermitted discharges of pollutants to waters of the United States are violations of federal Clean Water Act (Clean Water Act) section 301. Clean Water Act section 301 violations are subject to liability under Water Code section 13385, which authorizes the Central Coast Water Board to impose administrative civil liability of up to $10,000 per day of violation and $10 per gallon discharged but not cleaned up over 1,000 gallons. Alternatively, a court may impose civil liability of up to $25,000 for each day the violation occurs, and up to $25 per gallon of waste discharged but not cleaned up over 1,000 gallons.

Furthermore, the Central Coast Water Board reserves the right to take any enforcement action authorized by law including, but not limited to, termination of the Compost General Order coverage (Compost General Order Additional Requirement 1) which may result from any noncompliance with Compost General Order requirements, and would require the Discharge to implement a closure plan to perform site restoration as outlined in the Facility’s Technical Report.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Jordan Haserot by phone at (805) 542-4781 or email at [email protected], or Ryan Lodge at (805) 549- 3506.

Sincerely,
for Thea S. Tryon
Assistant Executive Officer
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Tajiguas Compost Management Unit - 6 - March 17, 2023
Notice of Violation
cc:

John Kular, [email protected]
Jeanette Gonzales-Knight, [email protected]
Travis Spier, [email protected]
Christina Wilder, [email protected]
Norma Campos Bernal, [email protected]
Angela Schroeter, [email protected]
Ryan Lodge, [email protected]
Jordan Haserot, [email protected]
Thea Tryon, [email protected]
Tamara Anderson, [email protected]
Todd Stanley, [email protected]
Jesse Woodard, [email protected]
R:\RB3\Shared\LDU\Program\Compost\Compost Facilities\Tajiguas\NOVs\2023\Tajiguas Compost Managemenet Unit NOV.docx
GeoTracker ID: T10000017039
CIWQS Place ID: 874811
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board
June 20, 2023

SENT VIA ELECTRONIC AND CERTIFIED MAIL
John Dewey Certified Mail No. 7019-1640-0000-7909-3224
Chief Executive Officer
Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC
17 Corporate Plaza Drive, Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA 92660
[email protected]
Scott McGolpin Certified Mail No. 7019-1640-0000-7909-3251 Public Works Director
County of Santa Barbara Public Works
123 East Anapamu Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
[email protected]
Dear John Dewey and Scott McGolpin,
ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM: TAJIGUAS COMPOST MANAGEMENT UNIT, SANTA BARBARA COUNTY – NOTICE OF VIOLATION
The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Coast Region (Central Coast Water Board) is a state regulatory agency with the responsibility for protecting the quality of the waters of the state within its area of jurisdiction. The Central Coast Water Board has authority to require submission of information, direct action, establish regulations, levy penalties, and bring legal action when necessary to protect water quality. The purpose of this letter is to notify Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC and the County of Santa Barbara (Collectively referred to as Dischargers) of alleged violations of state law at its Tajiguas Compost Management Unit (Facility) located at 14470 Calle Real in Goleta, and to explain the potential civil administrative liability for non-compliance with state and federal laws, including unauthorized discharges of waste to waters of the state and waters of the United States. Unlike the previous March 17, 2023, NOV, which listed just Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC as a discharger/responsible party, this NOV also lists the County of Santa Barbara as a discharger/responsible party that is liable for Facility violations due to the County of Santa Barbara, Department of Public Works ownership of the Facility, per the Notice of Intent (NOI).

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Tajiguas Compost Management Unit - 2 - June 20, 2023
Notice of Violation
Background
The Dischargers are enrolled in General Waste Discharge Requirements for Commercial Composting Operations Order 2020-0012-DWQ (Compost General Order).

The Facility is also a postclosure land use at the Tajiguas Landfill, which is owned and operated by the County of Santa Barbara (County).

On March 17, 2023, the Central Coast Water Board issued a notice of violation (March 17, 2023, NOV) to Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC because of violations of the Compost General Order.

On May 8, 2023, the Central Coast Water Board issued an updated monitoring and reporting program (MRP) requiring the Dischargers conduct more frequent Facility inspections to inform immediate Facility repairs and corrective actions, provide additional details about Compost General Order compliance, provide Central Coast Water Board staff with more frequent and detailed Facility information about potential Compost General Order violations, and provide Facility specific requirements that more appropriately align with the site-specific operations.

On June 13, 2023, the Central Coast Water Board performed an inspection of the Facility. The June 13, 2023, Inspection Report noted that the violations outlined in the March 13, 2023, NOV had not been corrected. The continued Compost General Order violations include the following:

1. Water and wastewater have not been managed in accordance with the operational procedures within the approved Water and Wastewater Management Plan, which is required by Compost General Order Specification 6.

2. The unauthorized discharge of wastewater to surface water (Pila Creek), which violates Compost General Order Prohibition 6. During the June 13, 2023, inspection wastewater was seen leaving the Facility and entering two landfill stormwater drains that connect to landfill sediment basins. According to County staff, the basins discharged to Pila Creek on April 4.

3. The discharge of feedstock and compost outside of designated areas, including below the conveyor connecting the ADF to the CMU and the D-table area which still does not have a berm surrounding the working surface as was indicated within the Facility’s technical report, which is a violation of Compost General Order Prohibition 1 and Specification 4.

4. Facility berms continue to be damaged, which violates Compost General Order Design, Construction, and Operation Requirements – All Tiers number 10 and Maintenance Requirement 1.

5. The Facility conveyance system pipes continue to be damaged and leak wastewater to areas outside of the Facility, which violates Compost General Order Design, Construction, and Operation Requirements – All Tiers number 11.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Tajiguas Compost Management Unit - 3 - June 20, 2023
Notice of Violation

6. The Dischargers have not implemented sufficient corrective actions to address previous noncompliance, which violates General Order Additional Requirement 2.

7. The Dischargers have not adequately reported events of noncompliance or notified Central Coast Water Board of all Compost General Order violations, such as notification and reporting of the continued wastewater discharges from the Facility, which violates Compost General Order Monitoring and Reporting section B.3. and Compost General Order Notification Requirement 4.

8. Use of unapproved feedstocks due to the inclusion of significant physical contaminants, including plastics and glass, which is prohibited by Compost General Order Prohibition 3 and 4 and Specification 7.

Following the June 13, 2023, inspection, the Dischargers submitted an updated Water and Wastewater Management Plan, which is still under review and has not been approved.

Alleged Violations
As indicated in the March 17, 2023, NOV, the drainage conveyance pipes were leaking wastewater outside of the Facility. The March 20, 2023, response to the March 17, 2023, Notice of Violation submitted on behalf of the Dischargers, indicated that the drainage conveyance pipes would be fixed after the rainy season. Per the Compost General Order, the “wet season” is defined as October 1 to April 30. As was noted in the June 13, 2023, inspection report, the pipes have not been repaired and the pipes continue to discharge wastewater from the Facility, even after the end of the wet season.

MRP B.3. and B.4. require that the Dischargers notify the Central Coast Water Board within 48 hours of knowledge of Compost General Order violations or within 24 hours of becoming aware of noncompliance that endangers human health or the environment.

As required by MRP B.4. the Dischargers must submit a report within 10 working days of an incident such as a wastewater discharge. No such report has been submitted for the discharge noted during the June 13, 2023, inspection. Per MRP B.4. the incident report is required to include the following information:
a. The approximate date, time, and location of the noncompliance including a description of the ultimate destination of any unauthorized discharge and the flow path of such discharge to a receiving water body;
b. A description of the noncompliance and its cause;
c. Include photographs of the working surface, compost piles, pipe inlets, and other documentation documenting site conditions during the discharge event; d. The available tank capacity (gallons) during each of the three days prior to each diversion event;
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Tajiguas Compost Management Unit - 4 - June 20, 2023
Notice of Violation
e. The flow rate, volume, and duration of any discharge involved in the noncompliance, and how that volume was determined (i.e., flow meter, sensor); f. The amount of precipitation (in inches) the day of any discharge and for each of the seven days preceding the discharge;
g. A description (location, date and time collected, field measurements of pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen and electrical conductivity, sample identification, date submitted to laboratory, and analyses requested, including sampling for the constituents listed in Error! Not a valid bookmark self-reference.) of noncompliance discharge samples and/or surface water samples taken; h. The period of noncompliance, including dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue;
i. A time schedule and a plan to implement corrective actions necessary to prevent the recurrence of such noncompliance; and
j. The laboratory analyses of the noncompliance discharge sample and/or upstream and downstream surface water samples shall be submitted to the Regional Water Board office within 45 days of the discharge.

During the June 13, 2023, inspection, Central Coast Water Board staff informed the Dischargers that a wastewater sample must be taken of the wastewater discharging from the Facility, that they must estimate the volume of discharge, and must immediately stop wastewater from discharging. On June 15, 2023, Rincon Consultants, Inc., on behalf of the Dischargers, verified via email that the Dischargers collected a wastewater sample from the leaking Facility runoff collection pipes on June 14, 2023.

The Facility continues to be in violation of MRP B.4. until a complete incident report is submitted and the discharge ceases. The Dischargers must also correct impacts from the discharge, such as the removal of impacted soil and wastewater that flowed offsite.

Compost General Order Monitoring Requirements 1 and 2 require that Dischargers comply with the requirements within the site specific MRP. MRP B.1. requires the submittal of monthly monitoring and maintenance reports by the 15th of each month. On June 14, 2023, Rincon Consultants, Inc. submitted the May 2023 Monthly Monitoring and Maintenance Report for the Tajiguas Compost Management Unit. The report was found to be insufficient at meeting the MRP requirements including the following:

1. The report was not properly signed and did not include the proper statement of certification in accordance with Compost General Order Report Requirement 5.

2. The report did not provide a transmittal letter explaining the essential points including identifying violations as well as actions taken or planned to correct violations, as required by MRP B.1.a.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Tajiguas Compost Management Unit - 5 - June 20, 2023
Notice of Violation

3. The report did not include a map showing location of observation stations or monitoring points as required by MRP B.1.b.

4. The report did not include all information in MRP section A.1.a. as required to be reported per MRP B.1.c. including a map showing where ponding on the working surface was observed, estimated size of affected area and flow rate of wastewater leaving the facility, a map of where wastewater had affected areas outside of the facility, and photographs of observed and corrected deficiencies.

5. The report did not include all information in MRP section A.1.b. as required to be reported per MRP B.1.d. including not reporting the available capacity within storage systems and capacity contained, estimated in gallons.

6. The report did not discuss the status of Compost General Order compliance and the status of correcting violations, as required by B.1.j.

7. The report did not include information for the percent of physical contaminants (e.g., glass, metal, plastic) by dry weight of received feedstock at the compost facility within the reporting month or what the primary physical contaminates were, as required by MRP B.1.k.

Immediate corrective actions must be taken to address the new and ongoing violations listed above and actions must be taken to ensure that future operations meet the conditions of the Compost General Order and associated MRP, as well as the approved Water and Wastewater Management Plan.

Potential Administrative Civil Liability
The Dischargers are hereby on notice that California Water Code (Water Code) section 13350 provides that any person who intentionally or negligently violates any conditions issued or amended by the Regional Water Board or State Water Board, is subject to administrative civil liability of up to $5,000 per day of violation or $10 per gallon of waste discharged. Alternatively, the superior court may impose civil liability for each violation of up to $15,000 per day or $20 per gallon of waste discharged.

The Dischargers do not have a permit to discharge pollutants to waters of the United States. Unpermitted discharges of pollutants to waters of the United States are violations of federal Clean Water Act (Clean Water Act) section 301. Clean Water Act section 301 violations are subject to liability under Water Code section 13385, which authorizes the Central Coast Water Board to impose administrative civil liability of up to $10,000 per day of violation and $10 per gallon discharged but not cleaned up over 1,000 gallons. Alternatively, a court may impose civil liability of up to $25,000 for each day the violation occurs, and up to $25 per gallon of waste discharged but not cleaned up over 1,000 gallons.

Furthermore, the Central Coast Water Board reserves the right to take any enforcement action authorized by law including, but not limited to, termination of the Compost DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Tajiguas Compost Management Unit - 6 - June 20, 2023
Notice of Violation
General Order coverage (Compost General Order Additional Requirement 1) which may result from any noncompliance with Compost General Order requirements, and would require the Dischargers to implement a closure plan to perform site restoration as outlined in the Facility’s Technical Report.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Jordan Haserot by phone at (805) 542-4781 or email at [email protected], or Ryan Lodge at (805) 549- 3506.

Sincerely,
for Thea S. Tryon
Assistant Executive Officer
cc:

John Kular, [email protected]
Dylan Ellis, [email protected]
Caitlyn Teague, [email protected]
Marty Wilder, [email protected]
Travis Spier, [email protected]
Jeanette Gonzales-Knight, [email protected]
Christina Wilder, [email protected]
Kevin Brown, [email protected]
Norma Campos Bernal, [email protected]
Jacqueline Tkac, [email protected]
Angela Schroeter, [email protected]
Ryan Lodge, [email protected]
Jordan Haserot, [email protected]
Thea Tryon, [email protected]
Tamara Anderson, [email protected]
Todd Stanley, [email protected]
Jesse Woodard, [email protected]
R:\RB3\Shared\LDU\Program\Compost\Compost Facilities\Tajiguas\NOVs\2023\June 2023\June 2023 Tajiguas CMU Notice of Violation.docx
GeoTracker ID: T10000017039
CIWQS Place ID: 874811
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9

ATTACHMENT D
Non-payment to Subcontractors and Regulatory Agency

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 1 Jeanette Gonzales-Knight
From: Kevin Brown
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 9:55 AM
To: Jeanette Gonzales-Knight
Subject: FW: Outstanding MSB Invoices
Attachments: 60445.pdf; 60559.pdf; 60588.pdf; 60647.pdf Importance: High
Jeanette,
See attached for MSB’s outstanding invoices with the APCD. In addition to these invoices, MSB has not paid the settlement fee for their NOVs (see the email from Glenn Gazdecki yesterday).

I also asked that the APCD gives me a heads up if a stop work order is issued since this would impact the MRF biofilter and GORE permits.

Thank you,
Kevin Brown
Interim Compliance Manager
Senior Compliance Analyst
Santa Barbara County Public Works
Resource Recovery and Waste Management Division
130 East Victoria Street, Suite 100
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Email: [email protected]
Office: (805) 882‐3622
Cell: (858) 776‐7045
From: Gerardo De Los Santos <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 9:28 AM
To: Kevin Brown <[email protected]>
Cc: Rachel Silva <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Outstanding MSB Invoices
Caution: This email originated from a source outside of the County of Santa Barbara. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify the sender and know the content is safe.

Good morning Kevin,
Please see attached MSB outstanding invoices ‐ 60445, 60559, 60588 and 60647.

Thanks for the clarification.

Thank you,
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 2 Gerardo De Los Santos
Accounting Technician
Air Pollution Control District
Santa Barbara County
260 N. San Antonio Rd., Suite A
Santa Barbara, CA 93110
[email protected]
805.979.8291
ourair.org @OurAirSBC
Sign Up for Air Alerts
Notice: This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

From: Kevin Brown <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 8:19 AM
To: Rachael A. Silva <[email protected]>
Subject: Outstanding MSB Invoices
Good Morning Rachael,
Hope all is going well. Can you send me copies of any outstanding invoices that Mustang Santa Barbara (MSB) has? I currently know of three: 60445, 60559, and 60588.

Additionally, I would like to clarify some statements made by John Dewey in some past emails to you and Gerardo. The County has provided MSB the contractual payments on time and we are current with those payments. We do not “control” his budget as he stated.

Appreciate the help!
Thank you,
Kevin Brown
Interim Compliance Manager
Senior Compliance Analyst
Santa Barbara County Public Works
Resource Recovery and Waste Management Division
130 East Victoria Street, Suite 100
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Email: [email protected]
Office: (805) 882‐3622
Cell: (858) 776‐7045
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Bill To:

Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC.
17 Corporate Plaza, Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Attention: Mr. John Dewey

INVOICE
260 North San Antonio Rd Suite A
Santa Barbara, CA 93110-1315
Invoice:60445
Date:6/20/2023
Terms:Net 30 Days
SBCAPCD Tax ID #77-0384167

REMIT PAYMENTS TO THE ADDRESS ABOVE
Please indicate invoice number 60445 on your remittance.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING YOUR INVOICE PLEASE EMAIL [email protected] The APCD charges $25.00 for returned checks. Other Penalties/fees may be incurred as a result of returned checks (see District Rule 210).

Total Due: $9,619.43
Project Name: 205669-Resource Recovery Mustang
Hours Rate Total
Air Quality Engineer I/II 2.0 $142.23 $284.46
Air Quality Engineer III 43.5 $179.27 $7,798.25
Air Quality Specialist III 3.5 $164.22 $574.77
Division Manager 1.0 $235.50 $235.50
Extra-Help 4.0 $181.61 $726.45
Subtotal 54.0 $9,619.43
Company No.:110368
Billing Type:Staff Labor /Contractor Billing
Billing Period:05/15/2023-06/11/2023
Project No.:205669
Facility/Permit No.:11480/
Vendor No.:N/A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Billing Detail
Billing From: 5/15/2023 to 6/11/2023 Report Date: 6/14/2023 Date Billed: 6/20/2023
Project 205669 Resource Recovery Mustang
Permit:

Activity 460 Conducting health risk assessments including gathering inputs, modeling, writing HRA reports, reviewing HRAs performed by applicants, writing comment letters, meetings.

Extra-Help 0.5 hours

0.5 hours
Permit:

Activity 202 Responsible Agency Review
Extra-Help 3.5 hours

3.5 hours
Permit:

Activity 300 All activities associated with an inspection including preparation, travel to and from site, site visit, compliance review, recordkeeping and report review, preparation and review of inspection report.

Air Quality Specialist III 2.5 hours

2.5 hours
Permit:

Activity 302 Review and documentation of violations, review violation response, correspondence, follow up on violation until compliance is acheived.

Air Quality Specialist III 1.0 hours
Division Manager 1.0 hours

2.0 hours
Permit:

Activity 400 Process and review letters, draft & final permits, evaluation correspondence and other materials associated with specific permits. Attend meetings (including site visits) specific to permits.

Air Quality Engineer III 41.5 hours

41.5 hours
Permit:

Activity 431 Report review, correspondence, comment letters, and approval letters.

Air Quality Engineer III 2.0 hours

2.0 hours
Permit:

Activity 434 Review source test reports, prepare comment letters, correspondence, and approval letters.

Air Quality Engineer I 2.0 hours

2.0 hours
Project Total: 54.0 hours

Page 26 of 61 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Bill To:

Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC.
17 Corporate Plaza, Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Attention: Mr. John Dewey

INVOICE
260 North San Antonio Rd Suite A
Santa Barbara, CA 93110-1315
Invoice:60559
Date:7/10/2023
Terms:Net 30 Days
SBCAPCD Tax ID #77-0384167

REMIT PAYMENTS TO THE ADDRESS ABOVE
Please indicate invoice number 60559 on your remittance.

Total Due: $30,472.32
DAS Program:

Description Total
ADF 1 - DAS Program Fee July - December 2023 $7,618.08
ADF 2 - DAS Program Fee July - December 2023 $7,618.08
MRF 1 - DAS Program Fee July - December 2023 $7,618.08
MRF 2 - DAS Program Fee July - December 2023 $7,618.08
$30,472.32
Company No.:110368
Billing Type:DAS Program Fee
Billing Period:FY 23 - 24
Project No.:200630
Facility/Permit No.:

Vendor No.:N/A
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 aped
air pollution control district

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
260 North San Antonio Rd Suite A
Santa Barbara. CA 93110-1315

INVOICE
2:4/"^ /ZOJO
lnvolce;60588»
Date:8/16/2023
TermsiNet 30 Days
SBCAPCD Tax ID #77-0384167
Bill To:

Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC.
17 Corporate Plaza, Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Attention: Mr. John Dewey
Company No.:110368
Billing TypeiStaff Labor /Contractor Billing
Billing Period;06/12/2023-07/23/2023
Project No.:205669
Facility/Permit No.:11480/
Vendor No.:N/A
Project Name: 205669-Resource Recovery Mustang
Air Quality Engineer l/ll
Air Quality Engineer III
Extra-Help
Hours

2.0 8.0

5.0 Rate
$153.18
$193.07
$195.59
Total
$306.36
$1,544.56
$977.95
Subtotal 15.0 $2,828.87
Total Due: $2,828.87

REMIT PAYMENTS TO THE ADDRESS ABOVE
Please indicate invoice number 60588 on your remittance.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING YOUR INVOICE PLEASE EMAIL [email protected] The APCO charges $25.00 for returned checks. Other Penalties/fees may be incurred as a result of returned checks (see District Rule 210).

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Billing Detail
Billing From; 6/12/2023 to 7/23/2023
Date Billed: 8/16/2023
Report Date: 8/14/2023
Project 205669
Permit:

Resource Recovery Mustang
Activity 202 Responsible Agency Review
Extra-Help 5.0 hours

5.0 hours
Permit:

Air Quality Engineer III 8.0 hours

8.0 hours
Permit:

Activity 434 Review source test reports, prepare comment letters, correspondence, and approval letters.

Air Quality Engineer I 2.0 hours

2.0 hours
Project Total: 15.0 hours

Page 20 of 55 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 aped
air pollution control district

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
260 North San Antonio Rd Suite A
Santa Barbara, CA 93110-1315

INVOICE
InvoiceOTST??
Date:9/22/2023
TermsiNet 30 Days
SBCAPCD Tax ID #77-0384167
Bill To:

Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC.
17 Corporate Plaza, Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Attention: Mr. John Dewey
Company No.:110368
Billing Type:Staff Labor /Contractor Billing
Billing Period:07/24/2023-09/03/2023
Project No.:205669
Facility/Permit No.:11480/
Vendor No.:N/A
Project Name: 205669-Resource Recovery Mustang
Hours Rate Total
Air Quality Engineer l/ll 3.0 $153.18 $459.54
Air Quality Engineer III 13.0 $193.07 $2,509.91
Division Supervisor 1.0 $221.09 $221.09
Air Quality Specialist III 6.5 $176.86 $1,149.59
Division Manager 4.0 $253.63 $1,014.53
Extra-Help 8.0 $195.59 $1,564.73
Subtotal 35.5 $6,919.39
County Counsel Charges 4/1/23-6/30/23 1.0 $193.35 $193.35 Subtotal 1.0 $193.35
Total Due: $7,112.74

REMIT PAYMENTS TO THE ADDRESS ABOVE
Please indicate invoice number 60547 on your remittance.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING YOUR INVOICE PLEASE [email protected] The APCD charges $25.00 for returned checks. Other Penalties/fees may be incurred as a result of returned checks (see District Rule 210).

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Billing Detail
Billing From: 7/24/2023 to 9/3/2023
Date Billed: 9/22/2023
Report Date: 9/19/2023
Project 205669
Permit:

Activity 460
Resource Recovery Mustang
Conducting health risk assessments including gathering inputs, modeling, writing HRA reports, reviewing HRAs performed by applicants, writing comment letters, meetings.

Extra-Help 1.5 hours

1.5 hours
Permit:

Activity 202 Responsible Agency Review
Extra-Help 6.5 hours

6.5 hours
Permit:

Activity 302 Review and documentation of violations, review violation response, correspondence, follow up on violation until compliance is acheived.

Air Quality Engineer III
Air Quality Specialist III

1.0 hours

3.5 hours

4.5 hours
Permit:

Activity 350 Receiving and reviewing variance petition, drafting public notice, preparing variance orders and staff reports, correspondence with petitioner, attending Hearing Board meeting, responding to Inquiries, receipt and review of increments of progress and fina Air Quality Specialist
Division Manager

3.0 hours

3.5 hours

6.5 hours
Permit:

Activity 400 Process and review letters, draft & final permits, evaluation correspondence and other materials associated with specific permits. Attend meetings {including site visits) specific to permits.

Air Quality Engineer III
Division Supervisor
Division Manager

12.0 hours

1.0 hours

0.5 hours

13.5 hours
Permit:

Activity 430 Review plans and proposed modifications to plans, preparation of comment letters, correspondence, and preparation of approval letters.

Air Quality Engineer I 2.0 hours

2.0 hours

Page 18 of 54 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Billing Detail
Billing From; 7/24/2023 to 9/3/2023 Report Date: 9/19/2023 Date Billed: 9/22/2023
Permit:

Activity 432 Review source test plan and any proposed modifications, prepare comment letters, correspondence, and prepare approval letters.

Air Quality Engineer I 1.0 hours

1.0 hours
Project Total: 35.5 hours

Page 19 of 54 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Labor Summary From 4/1/2023 to 6/30/2023
Selection Crtteria: EmployeelD = 1-: Fund = 0001: Department = 013: Project = 8910 Layout Options: Summarized By = Project. Activity; Page Break At = Fund; Columns = PostOn. PayPerlod Fund 0001 - General
Employee ID Employee Name
Department 013 - County Counsel
Project 6910 - Air Poll DIst
Post On
Pay
Period Amount Prod Hours Prod Rate
205811
OO0 County of Santa Barbara. FIN Lest Updated: 7/3/2023 12:06 AM Page 1 of 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Labor Summary From 4/1/2023 to 6/30/2023
Selection Criteria: EtnployeelD - 1-; Fund - 0001; Department - 013; Project - 8910 Layout Options: Summarized By = Prpject. Activity; Page Break At = Fund; Columns = PostOn. PayPertod Fund 0001 -- General
Employee ID Employee Name Post On Period Amount Prod Hours Prod Rate 205317
205516
Activity TAJI-Tajiguas 205669
13560 ALIRE. JENNIFER RICHARDSON 04/16/2023 202309
Total Tajiguas
Total Air Poll Dist
135.00 0.70 192.86
135,00 0.70 192.86
Overtiead Rate;
APCD 1.4322-135.00 =$193.36
County of Santa Barbara. FIN Last Updated: 7/3/2023 12:06 AM Page 2 of 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 1 Jeanette Gonzales-Knight
From: Kevin Brown
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 3:36 PM
To: Jeanette Gonzales-Knight
Subject: Fwd: Mutual Settlement Offer - 12 NOVs (Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC Attachments: 2023-07-11 Violation Settlement Agreement (12 NOVs - MRPV)-Signed.pdf; 2023-09-27 MS Offer NOV 13338.pdf
FYI.

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Get Outlook for Android
From: Glenn G. Gazdecki <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 3:02:19 PM
To: John Dewey <[email protected]>; Kevin Brown <[email protected]> Cc: Mutual Settlement <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Mutual Settlement Offer ‐ 12 NOVs (Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC) Caution: This email originated from a source outside of the County of Santa Barbara. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify the sender and know the content is safe.

John,
Attached is a pdf copy of the signed Violation Settlement Agreement for the aforementioned 12 NOVs. To date, the District has not received payment for the agreed settlement of civil penalties. The District requests that full payment for the past due amount of $18,250 be submitted forthwith.

Also, please find attached a Mutual Settlement Offer for NOV 13338. Your timely response to this is also requested.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely, Glenn
Glenn G. Gazdecki
Mutual Settlement Officer
Air Pollution Control District
Santa Barbara County
[email protected]
(805) 979‐8301 (Office)
ourair.org @OurAirSBC
Sign Up for Air Alerts
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 2 Notice: This e‐mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e‐mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

From: John Dewey <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2023 2:16 PM
To: Glenn G. Gazdecki <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: Mutual Settlement <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Mutual Settlement Offer ‐ 12 NOVs (Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC)

Glenn,

Attached please find the Settlement Agreement which we have signed.

Kevin Brown and I had a discussion with Aimee Long and Charlotte Mountain today regarding NOV 13338. Aimee wil reach out to you on that matter.

Thanks for your assistance.

Best Regards,

John Dewey
CEO
Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC
17 Corporate Plaza, Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA 92660
(805) 259‐9499

From: Glenn G. Gazdecki <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 5:10 PM
To: John Dewey <[email protected]>; [email protected] Cc: Mutual Settlement <[email protected]>
Subject: Mutual Settlement Offer ‐ 12 NOVs (Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC)

Dear John Dewey and Kevin Brown,
Good afternoon.

My name is Glenn Gazdecki and I am the Mutual Settlement Officer for the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District. Attached is the District’s Mutual Settlement Offer for 12 Notices of Violation (NOVs 12924, 13195, 13196, 13215, 13255, 13258, 13266, 13310, 13312, 13313, 13315, 13318).

If you agree with the terms of the Settlement Offer, please sign and date the Agreement, and return a copy of the signed Agreement to me via email. After I receive the signed Agreement, I will sign it and send you a signed copy for your records.

Payment made by check should be made payable to the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District and remitted to:

Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District
260 N. San Antonio Road, Suite A
Santa Barbara, CA 93110
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 3 On a related matter, NOV 13338 was not included in this settlement offer because the Compliance database indicates that the violation has not returned to compliance. NOV 13338 is a Rule 201 (Permits Required) violation and each day of non-compliance may be considered a separate violation. Therefore, it is important that you follow-up with Aimee Long (Air Quality Specialist) at your earliest opportunity to address actions that still need to be taken to return to compliance. After the violation has returned to compliance, I will issue a separate Mutual Settlement Offer.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely, Glenn Gazdecki
Glenn G. Gazdecki
Mutual Settlement Officer
Air Pollution Control District
Santa Barbara County
[email protected]
(805) 979‐8301 (Office)
ourair.org @OurAirSBC
Sign Up for Air Alerts
Notice: This e‐mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e‐mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 [email protected]
09/27/2023
Re: Mutual Settlement Offer - Notice of Violation #13338 Dear John Dewey:

On 05/26/2023 the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District (District) issued Notice of Violation (NOV) No. 13338 (attached) for operating the Gore composting pilot project without a District permit, which is a violation of District Rule 201 and H&SC Section 42300. According to our records, the facility returned to compliance by ceasing operations and removing the equipment at the end of the 30- day pilot project.

The District reviewed the NOV case and this letter is an offer of settlement for civil penalties through the District’s Mutual Settlement Program. More information on our program is available here:
www.ourair.org/biz/notices-of-violation-and-the-mutual-settlement-program.

The California Health and Safety Code specifies that the penalties for violations may include civil penalties for each day of each violation (California Health and Safety Code Section 42402 et seq.). We are proposing a reduced amount from that allowed in the California Health and Safety Code. This reduced amount takes into account the magnitude and severity of the violation, as well as the prior history of violations of a similar nature that have occurred at the facility and by the owner/operator.

In an effort to avoid the time and expense of litigation that would accrue to both parties, the District is willing to settle this matter through our Mutual Settlement Program for the sum of $500.00, provided you agree to abide by the terms identified in the attached Violation Settlement Agreement.

If you wish to settle the matter on this basis, return the attached Violation Settlement Agreement, signed and dated, along with remittance of $500.00, payable to the Santa Barbara County APCD, by 10/11/2023.

Payment may be made by check or credit card, using the Credit Card Authorization Form-01C, available here: https://www.ourair.org/wp-content/uploads/apcd-01c.pdf. Please identify NOV 13338 on the check or credit card authorization form.

If the signed Violation Settlement Agreement is received by the above date, the District will provide you with the final Violation Settlement Agreement, signed by both Parties. If you return a signed Violation Settlement Agreement after the due date, the District reserves the right to decline to settle this matter and may take other appropriate enforcement action.

John Dewey
Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC.
17 Corporate Plaza, Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA 92660
FID: 11480
SSID: 03707
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 This letter constitutes an offer of settlement and is not a demand for payment. If you wish to provide additional evidence as to the facts in this case, you may contact me by 10/11/2023.

If I do not hear from you by the due date, the District may take further enforcement actions including referral of the matter to the Santa Barbara County District Attorney’s Office for further civil law enforcement action.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (805) 979-8301.

Sincerely,
Glenn Gazdecki, Mutual Settlement Officer
Compliance Division
Attachments: Violation Settlement Agreement
NOV 13338
cc: Electronic Mutual Settlement File – NOV 13338
Jeanette Gonzales-Knight
Kevin Brown
Kaitlin McNally
Eric Kett

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 September 27, 2023

VIOLATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
This Notice of Violation Settlement Agreement (hereinafter “Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between the SANTA BARBARA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL OFFICER (hereinafter “CONTROL OFFICER” or “DISTRICT”) and Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC. (hereinafter “NOV RECIPIENT”). The CONTROL OFFICER and NOV RECIPIENT are collectively referred to herein as the “Parties”.

I. FACTUAL RECITALS
The CONTROL OFFICER pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 40752 enforces the provisions of parts 3 and 4 of Division 26 of the Health and Safety Code; all orders, regulations and rules adopted by the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District Board; all variances and standards prescribed by the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District Hearing Board (Hearing Board); and all permit conditions imposed pursuant to Health and Safety Code sections 42301 and 42301.10 The DISTRICT issued NOV RECIPIENT Notice of Violation 13338, which is the subject of this settlement. The Parties wish to resolve all disputes with respect to this Notice of Violation.

II. AGREEMENTS BY THE PARTIES
IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual promises described in this agreement, the Parties agree as follows:

1. NOV RECIPIENT agrees to and shall pay the DISTRICT a civil penalty of $500.00.

2. NOV RECIPIENT shall submit payment of the civil penalty to the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District at 260 N San Antonio Rd, Ste A, Santa Barbara, CA 93110. NOV RECIPIENT shall submit payment in full with the return of this Agreement signed by NOV RECIPENT and submitted to the DISTRICT no later than 10/11/2023.

3. Upon full execution of this Agreement by the Parties and payment of civil penalties, pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 42400.7(a), such recovery precludes prosecution under Section 42400, 42400.1, 42400.2, 42400.3, 42400.3.5, or 42400.4 for the offenses identified in the NOV. However, that release does not relieve NOV RECIPIENT from complying with the regulations of other government agencies and it does not address or resolve violations of regulations which may be enforced by any other agency.

4. The DISTRICT reserves the right to prove the alleged violations in connection with any petition for a variance, permit revocation, or abatement order before the Hearing Board, and to rely on the alleged violations in connection with the determination of the appropriate penalty in the event similar Notices of Violation are issued in the future. Similarly, at any such time NOV RECIPIENT may raise any defenses or contrary proof concerning the facts of the alleged violations.

III. ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS

1. Time Is Of The Essence. Time is of the essence for each term and condition of this Agreement.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9

2. Authorization to Enter Into Agreement. Each Party executing this Agreement represents and warrants that it has been duly authorized to enter into this Agreement, and has full and complete authority to do so. Each Party expressly waives any defense to this Agreement based on any lack of authority to enter into and be bound by the terms of this Agreement.

3. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed, governed and enforced under and pursuant to the laws of the State of California. Any action to enforce or interpret this Agreement shall be filed and/or maintained within the County of Santa Barbara, California.

4. Advice of Counsel. Each of the Parties, by the execution of this Agreement, represents that it has reviewed each term of this Agreement with its legal counsel, or has had the opportunity to do so, and further agrees that it shall not deny the validity of the Agreement on the grounds that it did not have advice of counsel.

5. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the Parties pertaining to resolution of the Notice of Violation. No supplement, modification, or amendment to this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

6. No Waiver of Default. Any waiver of default under this Agreement must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy shall impair that right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. A consent to or approval of any act shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary consent to or approval of any other or subsequent act.

7. Effective Date. The Effective Date of this Agreement shall be when fully executed by the Parties.

8. Attorneys’ Fees. Each party shall bear its own costs, including attorneys’ fees, in connection with the settlement of the Notice of Violation and this Agreement.

CONTROL OFFICER OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT Signature: _________________________________ DATE: _______________ By: Glenn Gazdecki
Title: Mutual Settlement Officer
NOV RECIPIENT - Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC.

Signature: ________________________________ DATE: _______________ Name: __________________________________________
Title: ___________________________________________

\\Sbcapcd.org\shares\Groups\Permitted Sources\03707\11480\NOVs\NOV 13338\MS\2023-09-27 MS Offer NOV 13338.docx DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 1 of 2
July 11, 2023

VIOLATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
This Notice of Violation Settlement Agreement (hereinafter “Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between the SANTA BARBARA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL OFFICER (hereinafter “CONTROL OFFICER” or “DISTRICT”) and Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC (hereinafter “NOV RECIPIENT”). The CONTROL OFFICER and NOV RECIPIENT are collectively referred to herein as the “Parties”.

I. FACTUAL RECITALS
The CONTROL OFFICER pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 40752 enforces the provisions of parts 3 and 4 of Division 26 of the Health and Safety Code; all orders, regulations and rules adopted by the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District Board; all variances and standards prescribed by the Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District Hearing Board (Hearing Board); and all permit conditions imposed pursuant to Health and Safety Code sections 42301 and 42301.10
The DISTRICT issued NOV RECIPIENT Notices of Violation Nos. 12924, 13310, 13313, 13315, 13318, 13195, 13196, 13215, 13255, 13258, 13266, and 13312, which are the subject of this settlement. The Parties wish to resolve all disputes with respect to these violations.

II. AGREEMENTS BY THE PARTIES
IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual promises described in this agreement, the Parties agree as follows:

1. NOV RECIPIENT agrees to and shall pay the DISTRICT a civil penalty of $18,250.

III. ADDITIONAL TERMS OR CONDITIONS

1. Time Is Of The Essence. Time is of the essence for each term and condition of this Agreement.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 2 of 2

5. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the Parties pertaining to resolution of the Notice(s) of Violation. No supplement, modification, or amendment to this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

7. Effective Date. The Effective Date of this Agreement shall be when fully executed by the Parties.

8. Attorneys’ Fees. Each party shall bear its own costs, including attorneys’ fees, in connection with the settlement of the Notice(s) of Violation and this Agreement.

CONTROL OFFICER OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT Signature: _______________________________________ DATE: _________________ By: Glenn Gazdecki

Title: Mutual Settlement Officer
NOV RECIPIENT – Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC

Signature: _______________________________________ DATE: _________________ Name: __________________________________________
Title: ___________________________________________
\\Sbcapcd.org\shares\Groups\Permitted Sources\03707\11480\NOVs\NOV 12924\MS\2023-07-11 Violation Settlement Agreement (12 NOVs - Mustang Renewable Power Ventures).docx
wable Power Ventures, LLC
__________________________
John Dewey
CEO & Managing
7/12/23
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 1 Jeanette Gonzales-Knight
From: Gloria Alvarez
Sent: Friday, November 3, 2023 11:08 PM
To: Jeanette Gonzales-Knight
Subject: FW: ProForma Working File 05162023
Attachments: MSB AP Aged-043023.xlsx
Hi Jeanette,
The attached was sent by E&Y during the review of MSB’s financials.

Let me know if you want me to reach out to Elizabeth to forward the email from John.

Gloria
From: Elizabeth Moe <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 9:33 AM
To: Alvarez, Gloria <[email protected]>
Cc: Meredith Willis <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: ProForma Working File 05162023
Caution: This email originated from a source outside of the County of Santa Barbara. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify the sender and know the content is safe.

Good morning Gloria – see attached for the aging payables file.

Thanks,
Liz

Elizabeth Moe | Senior Manager | Insurance & Federal Claims Services Ernst & Young LLP
Cell: +1.510.882.4353 | Direct: +1.213.240.7459 | [email protected] From: Alvarez, Gloria <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 6:07 PM
To: Elizabeth Moe <[email protected]>
Cc: Meredith Willis <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: ProForma Working File 05162023
Great, thank you.

Gloria
From: Elizabeth Moe <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 5:02 PM
To: Alvarez, Gloria <[email protected]>
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 2 Cc: Meredith Willis <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: ProForma Working File 05162023
Caution: This email originated from a source outside of the County of Santa Barbara. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi Gloria – request was sent!
Elizabeth Moe | Senior Manager | Insurance & Federal Claims Services Ernst & Young LLP
Cell: +1.510.882.4353 | Direct: +1.213.240.7459 | [email protected] From: Alvarez, Gloria <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 4:07 PM
To: Elizabeth Moe <[email protected]>
Cc: Meredith Willis <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: ProForma Working File 05162023
Hi Liz,
I was able to locate the attached MSB AP Aging Report as of June 30, 2022. Please have John provide the same PDF report as of April 30, 2023.

Thank you,
Gloria
From: Elizabeth Moe <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:53 AM
To: Alvarez, Gloria <[email protected]>
Cc: Meredith Willis <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: ProForma Working File 05162023
Caution: This email originated from a source outside of the County of Santa Barbara. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi Gloria,
Here is the AP listing John provided that shows the current payables but not the aging. Do you want us to follow‐up for the AP aging?
Thanks,
Liz
Elizabeth Moe | Senior Manager | Insurance & Federal Claims Services Ernst & Young LLP
Cell: +1.510.882.4353 | Direct: +1.213.240.7459 | [email protected] DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 5:23 PM
05/24/23 MSB Investors, LLC
A/P Aging Summary
As of April 30, 2023
Current 1 - 30 31 - 60 61 - 90 91 - 120 121 - 150 151 - 180 > 180 TOTAL AB Energy USA, LLC 0.00 21,146.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 139,963.98 7,250.40 195,773.67 364,134.54 Agromin 15,871.52 15,455.00 19,322.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50,649.33 Alliance Source Testing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,405.00 11,405.00 American Express 0.00 28,588.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28,588.41 Arthur J. Gallagher 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 519.00 -519.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Avensys Solutions 0.00 622.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 622.00 Axiom Engineers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,913.50 0.00 0.00 533,632.38 541,545.88 B Mortgage 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 Baker Tilly 4,200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,200.00 Bejac 25,006.69 100.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,107.32 Bekon Energy Technologies 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44,824.93 0.00 5,357.50 149,371.33 199,553.76 Brenntag Pacific, Inc. 0.00 14,282.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14,282.22 Brownstein Hyatt 0.00 7,621.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,621.40 California Electric Supply 6,820.59 1,269.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,090.50 CE SChmidt Environmental Consultant 19,320.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,320.00 CEMTEK Environmental 0.00 11,622.68 10,100.11 5,811.34 5,811.34 11,622.68 5,811.34 21,638.30 72,417.79ConFab 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cypress Engineering 0.00 0.00 2,100.00 11,550.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,650.00 Danks Family-Trust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Deep Blue Integration, Inc. 30,079.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,079.92 Delta Liquid Energy 50.02 1,578.74 1,755.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,384.41 Diani Building Corp 0.00 23,736.00 20,640.00 21,672.00 15,480.00 17,544.00 15,480.00 651,687.50 766,239.50Ecoverse 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,311.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,311.11 Hamon Overhead Door 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,563.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,563.33 John Dewey 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 2,500.00 142,500.00John Kular Consulting 0.00 10,805.00 5,815.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,620.00 Lee & Neal 0.00 5.25 109.01 116.89 116.89 122.14 116.89 7,620.92 8,207.99Linde Equipment Inc. 453.70 807.08 3,798.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,059.75 Luna Farm Labor, Inc. 0.00 21,494.80 7,616.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29,111.65 MarBorg Industries 1,110.00 41,060.10 39,976.10 38,589.10 58,514.72 29,064.60 70,927.43 122,402.79 401,644.84MarBorg Recovery LP 0.00 562,603.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 562,603.64 Mark Schleich 1,700.00 3,600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,300.00 McCormix Oil 13,684.48 21,261.00 8,377.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 43,322.88 McMaster Carr 0.00 0.00 11,522.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,522.09 Miles Chemical Company Inc. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 672.04 0.00 0.00 -672.04 0.00 Mustang Renewable Power Ventures, LLC 14,038.97 18,315.18 19,015.40 22,083.11 19,736.73 21,816.32 19,141.13 184,730.12 318,876.96North Western Energy Systems 11,866.27 15,373.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27,240.07 Nossaman LLP 0.00 903.00 0.00 0.00 2,620.00 7,547.00 16,223.00 74,465.00 101,758.00 Odor No More, Inc. 0.00 3,534.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,534.65 Oilfield Environmental & Compliance, Inc. 995.00 0.00 0.00 1,638.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,633.00 OptimX Services, LLC 15,445.02 22,486.90 20,628.26 27,153.57 8,481.67 11,291.04 15,421.17 0.00 120,907.63Pacific Petroleum 6,278.34 6,455.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,733.64 Patriot Environmental Services 2,100.00 10,500.00 14,700.00 8,400.00 2,100.00 9,072.00 4,536.00 53,928.00 105,336.00

Page 1 of 2 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 5:23 PM
05/24/23 MSB Investors, LLC
A/P Aging Summary
As of April 30, 2023
Current 1 - 30 31 - 60 61 - 90 91 - 120 121 - 150 151 - 180 > 180 TOTAL Perrys Electric Motors & Controls 0.00 0.00 2,510.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,510.26 Powerscreen of Northern California 0.00 3,371.63 3,584.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,956.39 Quincy Compressors 924.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,948.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,872.45 Quinn Company 513.19 11,198.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,711.68 Rain for Rent 0.00 2,302.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,302.20 Randolph Diesel Repair 4,154.71 5,842.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,996.81 Redwitz Advisors 0.00 281.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 281.75 Reece Plumbing 37.88 880.10 214.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,132.85 Rincon Consultants, Inc. 7,004.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,004.75 RMS Life Safety 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,020.00 2,380.00 0.00 4,760.00 8,160.00 Rolls Scaffold 88.07 5,871.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,959.07 Santa Barbara County APCD 23,269.90 9,993.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 33,263.41 SCS Engineers 20,754.53 23,770.68 13,803.45 0.00 27,306.90 19,374.99 27,492.15 21,029.13 153,531.83 Sheffield Financial 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Singer Lewak 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,000.00 Smith Electric 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,624.49 0.00 0.00 101,650.32 110,274.81 Soil Control Lab 0.00 698.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 698.00 Southern California Edison 12,401.40 -237,692.85 1,087.68 1,087.68 1,087.68 1,087.68 1,087.97 27,600.58 -192,252.18The Fire Consultants, Inc. 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,800.00 USA Mobile Drug Testing 0.00 198.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 198.00 Van Dyk Recycling Solutions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,670.59 9,670.59 World Oil 95.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 TOTAL 263,263.95 716,943.79 226,678.67 212,212.80 235,341.67 290,367.43 208,844.98 2,173,193.59 4,326,846.88

Page 2 of 2 ends

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DIANI
BUtrDtilo conP.

DIANT BUILDING CORP.

CONTRACTORS
May 12,2023
John Dewey
MSB Investors, LLC
17 CorporatePlaza Dr, Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA. 92660
Re: Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project
John,
Please review the following summary of outstanding accounts Dave Poorbaugh - Outstanding balance as of April 30,2023 is $263,760.00. Dave will be available to MSB the week of May 22,2023 to finish any loose ends you may need him for, but will no longer be available to MSB after Friday, May 26,2023.

RNG, LFG, and Miscellaneous MRF additions - Outstanding balance is $3,000,000.00. You have agreed to pay interest on this as well, and since DBC is borrowing at higher rates now, we need this paid without waiting for your funds to be released from the County of Santa Barbara. We previously agreed to accept payment by the end of June 2023, which has nothing to do with your current County of Santa Barbara negotiations andlor sale of MSB.

MSB Authorizedextras and CMU additions - Outstanding Balance is $1,296,950.47 - As stated above, we are expecting payment by the end of June 2023' Please let us know your intentions on when we will be receiving payments' Michael J. Diani
President
Diani Building Corp.

Santa Barbara County, Resource Recovery & Waste Management Division P.O. BOX 5757. SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA .93456-5757. (805) 925-9533 . FAX (805) 928-2150 www.diani.com
a
a
cc:

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 DIANI
BUITDIITG CORP.

DIANI BUILDING CORP.

CONTRACTORS
October 19,2023
John Dewey
MSB Investors,Inc,
17 Corporat ePIaza,Ste 200
Newport Beach, CA92660
Re: Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project (TRRP)
Notice of Failure to Make PaYment
Dear Mr. Dewey,
In accordance with Section 13.3.1 - Failure to Make a Payment to Subcontractor When Due, of our Construction Agreement for the subject project, Diani Building Corp. hereby provides notice ofyour failure to make timely payment in the amount of $4,601,732.30 (invoice summary attached). This amount does not reflect any outstanding amounts due and payable by the County of Santa Barbara.

Be advised that in accordance with the same above noted Construction Agreement Section, if you fail to make payment "...within (5) Business Days following the notice of failure to pay..." Diani Building Corp. will p*r.r" any and all rernedies available to it in accordance with Section13.4 of our Construction Agreement.

We hope that we can resolve this issue and avoid an unnecessary and protracted legal process.

Diani Building Corp.

Michael J.

President
Michael Minchella, Esq.

Scott D. McGolpin, P.E.

Director - County of Santa Barbara Public Works Department 123 E. Anapamu Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93 l0l
p.o. Box 5757 . SANTA MARIA, CALIFORNIA .93456-s7s7. (805) 925-9533 'FAX (805) 928-2ts0 www.diani.com
cc:

DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9

DIANI BUILDING CORP
Customer: MSB INVESTORS, LLC
Job: TAJIGUAS RESOURCE RECOVERY PROJECT
A/R OPen ltems
Date Amount Description lnvoice No
2/28/202r 3,000,000.00 TRRP Enhancements 2LO2943
2/28/2022 503,769.67 Added Scope 2202LL3
L3,2L6.O0 Site Management - Poorbaugh 22O2O57Rev 3/3L12022 16,048.00 Site Management - Poorbaugh 2204069 4/30/2022 slsLl2022 L2,285.83 Added Scope 2205075
20,768.00 Site Management - Poorbaugh 2205078 s/3r/2022 L7,936.00 Site Management - Poorbaugh 2206083 6/3012022 7/3u2022 14,160.00 Site Management - Poorbaugh 2207097
7,064.00 Wood Chipper Switchgear Pad 2208LO3 8/3r/2022
23,736.0O Site Management - Poorbaugh 2208L09 8/3L/2022 22,704.O0 Site Management - Poorbaugh 2209LL6 s/30/2022 LO/3L/2022 793,180.80 Added Scope 22LOL27Rev
15,480.00 Site Management - Poorbaugh 22LOL34 ro/3r/2022 17,544.OO Site Management - Poorbaugh 227LL5L LL/30/2022 12/3t12022 L5,480.00 Site Management - Poorbaugh 22L2L64 2L,672.OO Site Management - Poorbaugh 230LLg4 Ll3L/2023 20,640.00 Site Management - Poorbaugh 2302273 2/2812023 23,736.O0 Site Management - Poorbaugh 2303225 3l3L/2023 4/30/2023 20,640.00 Site Management - Poorbaugh 2304255 2L,672.O0 Site Management - Poorbaugh 2305280 s/3L/2023 TOTAL DUE 4,60L,732.30
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9

ATTACHMENT E
Non-compliance Impacts to County Projects
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 1 Jeanette Gonzales-Knight
From: Campos Bernal, Norma
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 11:36 AM
To: Joddi Leipner
Cc: Kevin Brown; Jeanette Gonzales-Knight
Subject: RE: NOP comments
Hi Joddi,
I only have 30 days from date of submittal to accept or reject the application. Once I do, the substitute meeting must be held within one year prior to the date EA accepted.

My options at this point are the following:
a. Hold my own EA meeting at the MRF and face delay or possible non‐concurrence from CalRecycle for ongoing violations or
b. Operator can rescind the application until a later date when compliant.

Please let me know how you would like to proceed.

Thank you,
Norma Campos Bernal, REHS
Senior Environmental Health Specialist
Environmental Health Services Division
Public Health Department
County of Santa Barbara
225 Camino del Remedio,
Santa Barbara, CA 93110
P 805.681.4942 | F 805.681-4901
E [email protected]
From: Joddi Leipner <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 11:02 AM
To: Campos Bernal, Norma <[email protected]>
Cc: Kevin Brown <[email protected]>; Jeanette Gonzales‐Knight <[email protected]> Subject: RE: NOP comments
Hi Norma,
The meeting is not just an information meeting it is the public hearing on the Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) pursuant to the State and County’s CEQA guidelines. At the meeting we review the findings of the EIR and then accept public comment. We are planning on doing a hybrid meeting (in person at the MRF education room and DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 2 using Zoom). Written responses to public comments (received verbally or in writing) are then provided in the Final EIR. The Draft EIR has to be available for comment for a minimum of 45 days and the public hearing must occur within the 45 day period. We are hoping to release the draft EIR next week (September 28th) and then hold the public meeting one month later (October 26th) to allow the public some time to review the document before the meeting and then still have approximately 15 days after the meeting to continue to receive comments before the comment period closes. I have confirmed that the Planning and Development hearing officer, our EIR consultant, and our staff are all available on October 26th. Our EIR consultant is not available to the week before and moving the hearing up further becomes a bit more difficult logistically.

For the Reconfiguration Project in 2009, the LEA used this same environmental hearing for their substitute meeting. We included info in our public notice and the LEA attended the meeting. If you participate in this meeting and we include info on our public notice wouldn’t it qualify as a substitute meeting as long as the SWFP application is accepted as complete and correct by October 26, 2024?
I do completely understand the ongoing concerns regarding the CMU odor violations but our engineering staff indicates that we need to move forward with the Capacity Increase project now as we are running out of capacity and the CEQA process and permitting both take a significant amount of time. We are releasing the EIR almost a year after the 10/24/22 early consultation meeting. My understanding is that the Gore Cover has been ordered and the contract for the installation of the equipment to operate the cover system is going to the Board on 10/3 so this hopefully shows progress in addressing the odor issues at the CMU.

The decision to submit the application yesterday was not made by me but again I believe necessary to meet the overall timeline for project implementation.

I am happy to discuss further and facilitate in anyway using our notice and environmental hearing for your required meeting our only constraint is that we would have to include the information in the notice by end of day tomorrow as we need to run a draft by the Independent on Thursday and then formally submit the ad for publication on Friday for the Independent on 9/28.

Regards,
Joddi
Joddi Leipner
Senior Engineering Environmental Planner
Resource Recovery and Waste Management
130 E. Victoria Street, Suite 100
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
(805) 882‐3614 (Work)
(805) 364‐1056 (Mobile)
From: Campos Bernal, Norma <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2023 10:15 AM
To: Joddi Leipner <[email protected]>
Cc: Kevin Brown <[email protected]>; Jeanette Gonzales‐Knight <[email protected]> Subject: RE: NOP comments
Good morning Joddi,
I am reaching out about the dates set for informational meeting scheduled for Oct. 26, 2023. Is there a reason why this date was scheduled? Can you provide information on the purpose of this meeting. I was anticipating that I could use DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 3 this meeting for the permit revision, but according to CCR27‐21660.4, the meeting must be held within one year prior to the date EA accepted the application package as complete and correct.

Furthermore, you may recall during our meeting on October 24, 2022 regarding the Tajiguas landfill capacity increase project discussion with yourself, Jeanette and the water board. I brought up the issue of pending violations as a reason to defer concurrence by CalRecycle.

There are still several ongoing violations that will probably not be mitigated until the GORE system has been installed and given additional time to eliminate compost odors.

Why was the revision submitted yesterday ?
Thank you,
Norma Campos Bernal, REHS
Senior Environmental Health Specialist
Environmental Health Services Division
Public Health Department
County of Santa Barbara
225 Camino del Remedio,
Santa Barbara, CA 93110
P 805.681.4942 | F 805.681-4901
E [email protected]
From: Leipner, Joddi <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2023 8:16 AM
To: Campos Bernal, Norma <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: NOP comments
Good Morning Norma,
Thank you for the comments.

Joddi
Joddi Leipner
Senior Engineering Environmental Planner
Resource Recovery and Waste Management
130 E. Victoria Street, Suite 100
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
(805) 882‐3614 (Work)
(805) 364‐1056 (Mobile)
DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9

Scott D. McGolpin
Public Works Director
Leslie Wells
Deputy Director
March 9, 2023
Norma Campos Bernal
Santa Barbara County Public Health Department
Environmental Health Services Division
225 Camino del Remedio
Santa Barbara, CA 93110
Via email: [email protected]
SUBJECT: Withdrawal of Permit Modification Dated March 18, 2022 Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project and Sanitary Landfill SWIS # 42-AA-0015
Dear Ms. Campos Bernal,
The County of Santa Barbara, Department of Public Works, Resource Recovery and Waste Management Division (RRWMD) wishes to withdraw the permit modification that was submitted on March 18, 2022 and requested the name change for the Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project and Sanitary Landfill. It is our intent to submit a Joint Technical Document Amendment at a later time, pursuant to changes that are required for the enrollment of the Tajiguas Landfill under the Water Board General Order for Active Class III Landfills in the Central Coast Region (Order No.

R3-2020-0001). These proposed changes will not include a modification to the permit itself.

We appreciate all of your support and guidance on this project. Please feel free to reach me at 805-882-3627 with any questions.

Sincerely,
Jeanette Gonzales-Knight, PE
Compliance Manager
Cc: Leslie Wells, County of Santa Barbara, Department of Public Works Christina Wilder, County of Santa Barbara, Department of Public Works DocuSign Envelope ID: 98909AAC-4B22-4F17-9C5A-C54D3B956ED9 Scott D. McGolpin
Public Works Director
Jeanette Gonzales-Knight
Deputy Director, Interim
January 3, 2024
John Dewey, CEO & Managing Member [US mail and emailed] MSB Investors, LLC
17 Corporate Plaza, Suite 200
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Email: [email protected]
SUBJECT: Final Notice of Contract Termination Effective January 3, 2024 & Transition of Operations
On December 12, 2023, the Board of Supervisors for the County of Santa Barbara unanimously voted to terminate the Agreement with MSB Investors LLC (MSB). Initially two termination dates were proposed based on varying components of the ReSource Center. However, since the Board hearing you have indicated to County staff that by January 1, 2024 MSB will no longer pay: (1) its employees; (2) for insurance to cover the ReSource Center – including, but not limited to, general liability, pollution liability, workers compensation, and damage to equipment insurance; and (3) its equipment debt service. In addition, MSB owes millions of dollars to various project subcontractors, several of whom are declining to do any work on the project until they are paid for prior work performed for MSB. MSB has also requested immediate transfer of permitting and compliance obligations with the varying regulatory agencies for the ReSource Center to the County, as well as for the County to take over maintenance obligations for the ReSource Center.

As noted, in the County’s letter to MSB on December 15, 2023, the County has, per MSB’s request, hired MSB’s employees as extra help which was needed to continue to operate the Anerobic Digestion Facility and Compost Management Unit at the ReSource Center during this transition. In addition, the County has also already agreed to take over permitting and compliance obligations and is in the process of notifying the respective regulatory agencies. As MSB has provided the County with the deadline of the end of December for the numerous issues listed above, there appears to be no remaining design, build or operating services that MSB will be providing under the Agreement. Accordingly, the full Agreement for Development and Operation of the Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project between the County and MSB is terminated as of January 3, 2024, and MSB is required to assist with the transition of operations in accordance with Article 15.20 of the Agreement, as well as comply with any contract provisions that survive termination. These obligations, as previously outlined, include, but are not limited to:
 Deliver to County all computer data, files and tapes, reports, records, documents, and all written materials related to Operations at the Project Site.  Promptly turn over all keys and security codes for access to property and Operations at the Project Site.
 Leave Project Site, facilities and Project equipment clean, intact and fully operable, and deliver possession of the Project Site as directed by County.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 33C6670F-9F26-4F40-AD4E-05AD1682DE49 Attachment 2
John Dewey, CEO & Managing Member
MSB Investors, LLC
January 3, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

 Vacate the Project Site, removing all Contractor property not related to Project Operations.  Transfer to the County or at the County’s request to a new contractor(s), the rights to use any and all patents, licenses, trade secrets, or other intellectual property necessary for all Operations at the Project Site.
 Deliver possession of any proprietary components needed for all Operations at the Project Site to the County or at the County’s request to the new operator.  Provide thirty (30) Days of training of such personnel designated by the County as may reasonably be necessary to enable the County or a new contractor(s) to safely and successfully commence Project Operations.
 Pay all taxes due to appropriate parties including, but not limited to, State, County, Public Participants, and other local agencies.

As to final payments to MSB, the County is currently working on a final accounting and will send follow up correspondence regarding this matter.

Finally, the County remains interested in engaging in mediation regarding the Agreement and will reach out to your counsel to address potential mediators, dates and the parameters of mediation.

Please contact Jeanette Gonzales-Knight at 805-882-3627 if you have any questions.

Sincerely,
Jeanette Gonzales-Knight, PE
Interim Deputy Director
cc: Beth Collins and Jessica Diaz, Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP Scott McGolpin, Santa Barbara County Public Works Department DocuSign Envelope ID: 33C6670F-9F26-4F40-AD4E-05AD1682DE49

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: February 13, 2024
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Downtown Team Division, Public Works Department
SUBJECT: Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan [Resolution]
RECOMMENDATION: That Council:

A. Approve the Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan; B. Adopt, by reading of title only, a Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Supporting the Lower Eastside Safety Enhancements Project and Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing Project, and Directing Staff to Apply for a Grant to Fund Design, Environmental Review, and Construction; and C. Determine that the Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan is exempt under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and Public Resources Code Section 21080.20, and direct the filing of a Notice of Exemption in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines § 15062.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The purpose of the Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan (Plan) is to identify ways to improve pedestrian and bicycle connectivity between the Lower Eastside and destinations south of US Highway 101 (US 101). In 2020, the City of Santa Barbara (City) was awarded an Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 4 Grant in the amount of $344,000 to develop the Plan. The Plan is intended to implement Policy

1.4 of the City’s adopted Pedestrian Master Plan (PMP), which states that “the City shall work to eliminate US 101 as a barrier to pedestrian travel,” and identifies a future overcrossing between the Lower Eastside neighborhood and Dwight Murphy Field as a possible strategy to achieve that goal. The Plan also builds upon Santa Barbara’s Vision Zero Strategy (Vision Zero), which is to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries, while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all.

The Plan’s contents are based on ATP grant guidelines that include how and why the Plan was developed, existing conditions analysis, community engagement, engineering approaches to address community mobility needs, and a feasibility assessment of the overcrossing (Attachment 1). Staff is requesting that Council approve the Plan and Agenda Item No. 5
File Code No. 670.08
Council Agenda Report
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan [Resolution] February 13, 2024

Page 2 ends

authorize staff to apply for grants to fund the design, environmental review, and construction of the Lower Eastside Safety Enhancements Project and the Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing Project, as described in the Plan.

DISCUSSION:

Planning Effort
The Plan Area is focused on the Lower Eastside neighborhood and destinations south of US 101 (East Beach, Dwight Murphy Field, Santa Barbara Zoo, etc.). To identify the community’s preferences and priorities for improving bike and pedestrian connectivity, the City conducted bilingual community engagement via a webinar on October 25, 2021, and an in-person meeting on October 30, 2021. Spanish interpretation was provided at both meetings. In addition, a bilingual online survey was launched between October and December of 2021. Through this outreach, the community gave input on what is working and not working for walking and biking routes between the Eastside Neighborhood and south of US 101 (at Milpas Street, Cacique Street, and Cabrillo Boulevard). Residents also conveyed strong support for the City to study the feasibility of an overcrossing that would start at the intersection of Canada and Pitos Streets and connect to Dwight Murphy Field, which is an alignment identified in the City’s PMP.

Paralleling the community engagement process, the City conducted a Vision Zero traffic safety analysis for the Plan Area using collision data to identify trends and recurring collision patterns. Milpas and Salinas Streets and Cabrillo Boulevard have been determined as highcollision corridors and have the highest traffic volumes in the Plan Area. Currently, active transportation access between the Eastside and Waterfront requires using Milpas Street and Cabrillo Boulevard, and Salinas Street bisects the Eastside neighborhood, exposing active transportation users to high collision corridors. The Plan identifies proposed safety enhancements to address collision patterns on Salinas Street, as well as planned or funded projects already in process for Milpas Street and Cabrillo Boulevard.

Following initial public outreach and after receiving support for studying a pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing, the City contracted with an engineering consultant, Consor, in May of 2022 to provide a Feasibility Study (Study) including preliminary engineering, environmental, and survey services for the Plan. The engineering services included the preparation of a structural feasibility analysis and conceptual design options for an overcrossing in the alignment the community supported (between the intersection of South Canada and Pitos Streets and Dwight Murphy Field). The environmental services included a preliminary geotechnical investigation, and preliminary biological resources, cultural resources, and hydraulic analyses. The survey work identifies existing topographical and right-of-way features and constraints in the Plan area. Cost estimates for the final design, environmental review, and construction of the overcrossing are also provided within the Study. The full Study and appendices are included as an attachment to the Plan.

Staff returned to the community in spring of 2023 and held two additional meetings, online and in-person, and launched a second online public survey. The purpose of the meetings Council Agenda Report
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan [Resolution] February 13, 2024

Page 3 ends

and survey were: 1) to share the findings of the Feasibility Study for a future pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing, and 2) to hear from the community on how frequently they would use an overcrossing, for what purpose (e.g., work, commute, recreation), and if it would change their choice of travel method between the Eastside and south of US 101. Most participants in the meetings and survey responses live in the Eastside, would use the overcrossing to reach recreational destinations (parks, zoo, beaches), and would use it daily or weekly.

Some survey respondents living in the East Beach neighborhood had concerns about having more foot traffic with the proposed overcrossing and unhoused activity in their neighborhood.

The Transportation and Circulation Committee (TCC) received two updates on the Planning Effort in 2021 and 2022 and reviewed the Draft Plan on October 26, 2023. Some committee members expressed concern for the estimated cost of a future overcrossing; however, overall, the TCC supported the Plan and made a recommendation to proceed to Council for Plan adoption.

The Plan
Per the ATP Guidelines, there are 16 required components for an Active Transportation Plan (Attachment 1). These components guided development of the Plan and include maps and descriptions of existing conditions for the Plan Area (e.g., bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure, demographics, land uses, collision data, etc.), a description of community engagement, and a framework for Plan implementation including proposed projects, cost estimates, and future maintenance requirements.

The Study for the pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing is part of the Plan and dives deeper into the structural and environmental feasibility of the proposed project. The other proposed safety enhancements within the Plan are more typical infrastructure treatments (e.g., curb extensions, sidewalk infill, lighting) and are anticipated to be designed and constructed with standard engineering practices.

Proposed Projects
The mobility barriers identified by the residents and the City’s Vision Zero safety analysis of the Plan Area resulted in two primary proposed projects: 1) the Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing Project, and 2) the Lower Eastside Safety Enhancements Project.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing
The proposed overcrossing would provide a facility for users of all ages and abilities that is separated from vehicular traffic, reduce travel distances, and connect residents directly to recreational destinations.

Lower Eastside Safety Enhancements
The Lower Eastside Safety Enhancements Project includes the following improvements Council Agenda Report
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan [Resolution] February 13, 2024

Page 4 ends

within the neighborhood and along corridors leading to crossing locations of US 101:
 Safe Routes to School Safety Enhancements, including curb extensions for the intersections at Montecito/Voluntario, Montecito/Soledad, Quinientos/Voluntario, Quinientos/Soledad, and Carpinteria/Soledad.
 Cacique to Canada Streets Bike Boulevard/Bike Friendly Street, including curb extensions at Canada/Hutash, Canada/Punta Gorda, and Cacique/ Voluntario to improve pedestrian crossings. This route connects to the existing Cacique/US 101 Undercrossing and would also connect pedestrians and cyclists to the future overcrossing at Canada/Pitos.
 Alisos Sidewalk Infill between Hutash and Cacique Streets - This would close a gap in sidewalk connectivity leading to the US 101 Undercrossing at Cacique Street, connecting pedestrians to and from commercial services along the Milpas Street Corridor and to the Waterfront.
 Salinas Street pedestrian and lighting safety enhancements - From the US 101 Freeway Off-Ramp into the neighborhood. This includes additional lighting throughout the Salinas corridor, curb extensions at Clifton/Salinas, a compact roundabout at Carpinteria/Salinas, a crosswalk, curb extensions and rectangular rapid flashing beacons at Hutash/Salinas, and a raised intersection for speed control from the highway off-ramp at Pitos/Salinas.

In addition, the Plan describes five planned and funded projects within the Plan area that are currently in various stages of development. These projects will address mobility challenges and traffic collision patterns identified in the Plan area.

BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

A cost estimate for the Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing, including final design, engineering, project management, construction engineering, contingency, and escalation is included in the Plan for a total of $32.5 million.

The Lower Eastside Safety Enhancements Project, which includes enhanced crossings, lighting, and sidewalk infill, is anticipated to cost a total of $8.2 million.

Grant funding is required to accomplish these infrastructure projects as the City does not have sufficient internal funding available to implement these projects. City staff is requesting that Council adopt a Resolution of Support to apply for grants that include the Lower Eastside Safety Enhancements Project and the Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing Project.

Two possible sources of grant funding are the State’s ATP and the SB1 Solutions for Congested Corridors Program (SB1 Solutions).

The ATP’s next grant cycle, Cycle 7, has grant applications due in June of 2024. The ATP is extremely competitive, and Cycle 7 will likely have a reduced overall amount of funding available due to the State’s budget deficit. The City is not in a financial position to support Council Agenda Report
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan [Resolution] February 13, 2024

Page 5 ends

the more than $5M matching fund commitment that is most likely needed to compete with other applications from around the State for the ATP Cycle 7 grant..

The Streets Fund has a structural deficit and is not a potential funding source as a local match. Measure C cannot be used without significant impacts to street maintenance activities and addressing the large backlog of street maintenance. Even without this grant match, street maintenance funding is trending downward. Given these constraints, staff recommends that the City proceed with a grant application containing no local match funding. If there is any marginal funding available within the City’s Measure C account, it is staff’s strong recommendation that it be committed to Storm Drain analysis and improvement projects.

The next SB1 Solutions grant cycle, Cycle 4, has a December 2024 application deadline.

Staff is currently working with Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG) and Caltrans to incorporate the Lower Eastside Safety Enhancements Project with the Highway 101 High Occupancy Vehicle and Widening Project. It is anticipated that the local roadway network will see more vehicular traffic near US 101, and the Lower Eastside Safety Enhancements Project would provide the necessary safety enhancements for the most vulnerable road users (pedestrians and cyclists) in this highway-adjacent neighborhood. A grant match for the Lower Eastside Safety Enhancements Project is not required. If SBCAG and/or Caltrans are not successful in obtaining funding, the City will explore other grant opportunities to fund this project.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

The Plan and its recommended projects are consistent with the Council-adopted Vision Zero Strategy, Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plans, Circulation Element, and the City’s existing and draft Climate Action Plans. Implementing the Plan will provide residents with a safe active transportation mode choice in the Lower Eastside to get to and from the Waterfront, which will assist in reducing vehicle trips and greenhouse gas emissions.

The Lower Eastside meets the State’s and regional definitions of a disadvantaged community, and the neighborhood has historically been divided by US 101. The proposed overcrossing restores a critical neighborhood connection to the Waterfront for jobs, services, and recreation.

The proposed pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing is located in the Coastal Zone and is subject to the City’s Local Coastal Program and the California Coastal Act. The project will require a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) approved by the Planning Commission and appealable to City Council and the California Coastal Commission. The City’s Coastal Land Use Plan includes several applicable policies that seek to improve public access to the coast, remove Highway 101 as a barrier to pedestrian and bicycle access to coastal areas, encourage use of sustainable transportation, and minimize impacts on coastal and biological resources, including Sycamore Creek. The Feasibility Study (Attachment 3) discusses some of these policies in greater detail. Of note related to biological resources is Coastal Land Use Plan Policy 4.1-11, which prohibits alteration of creeks for new road Council Agenda Report
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan [Resolution] February 13, 2024

Page 6 ends

crossings unless there are no feasible alternatives. The CDP review process will involve a thorough analysis of the project for consistency with this and other policies.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

Under Santa Barbara Municipal Code (SBMC) § 22.100.070 and § 22.100.080, the Public Works Director has determined that the Plan is exempt under Public Resources Code Section 21080.20.

CEQA Exemption Criteria
Per Senate Bill 922 (Chapter 987, Statutes of 2022), Section 21080.20 establishes a statutory exemption that includes active transportation plans and pedestrian plans. An individual project that is a part of an active transportation plan or pedestrian plan would remain subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) unless another exemption applies to that project. The proposed plan includes a priority list of projects to be implemented after adoption of the plan and securing funding. All future projects as part of this plan will be subject to CEQA environmental review.

For these reasons, the Public Works Director, exercising authority under SBMC §

22.100.080, has determined that the Plan is exempt under CEQA. The Council has final authority to approve the Plan. Therefore, the Council must confirm the exemption before Plan approval. The recommended action will make the necessary environmental determination and authorize the filing of a Notice of Exemption for the Plan.

ATTACHMENTS: 1. Active Transportation Program Plan Requirements

2. Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan

3. Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan Feasibility Study
PREPARED BY: Sarah Clark, Downtown Team Manager/CAS/nv
SUBMITTED BY: Clifford M. Maurer, P.E., Public Works Director APPROVED BY: City Administrator’s Office
ATTACHMENT 1
Plan Requirements per Active Transportation Program (ATP) Guidelines The Active Transportation Guidelines require that an active transportation plan must Check if If not, explain why not include, but not be limited to, the following components or explain why the component included applicable. is not applicable. in SOW
A Mode Share: The estimated number of existing bicycle trips and pedestrian trips in the plan area, both in absolute numbers and as a percentage of all trips, and the estimated increase in the number of bicycle trips and pedestrian trips resulting from implementation of the plan.

B Description of Land Use/Destinations: A map and description of existing and proposed land uses which must include, but not be limited to, locations of residential neighborhoods, schools, shopping centers, public buildings, major employment centers, major transit hubs, and other destinations. Major transit hubs must include, but are not limited to, rail and transit terminals, and ferry docks and landings.

C Pedestrian Facilities: A map and description of existing and proposed pedestrian facilities, including those at major transit hubs and those that serve public and private schools.

D Bicycle Facilities: A map and description of existing and proposed bicycle transportation facilities, including those at major transit hubs and those that serve public and private schools.

E Bicycle Parking: A map and description of existing and proposed end-of-trip bicycle parking 0 A description of bicycle parking
facilities. Include a description of any existing and proposed policies related to bicycle parking facilities is included in the Plan; in public locations, private parking garages and parking lots and in new commercial and however, the facilities are not residential developments. Also include a map and description of existing and proposed currently mapped. In 2024, the bicycle transport and parking facilities for connections with and use of other transportation City plans to inventory all public modes. These must include, but not be limited to, bicycle parking facilities at transit stops, bicycle parking facilities and rail and transit terminals, ferry docks and landings, park and ride lots, and provisions for develop a City-wide mapping transporting bicyclists and bicycles on transit or rail vehicles or ferry vessels. database for these facilities.

F Wayfinding: A description of existing and proposed signage providing wayfinding along bicycle and pedestrian networks to designated destinations.

G Non-Infrastructure Programs: A description of existing and proposed bicycle and pedestrian education, encouragement, enforcement programs conducted in the area included within the plan. Include efforts by the law enforcement agency having primary traffic law enforcement responsibility in the area to enforce provisions of the law impacting bicycle and pedestrian safety, and the resulting effect on collisions involving bicyclists and pedestrians.

H
I
J
K
L
M
N
0 p
Collision Analysis: The number and location of collisions, serious injuries, and fatalities suffered by bicyclists and pedestrians in the plan area, both in absolute numbers and as a percentage of all collisions and injuries, and a goal for collision, serious injury, and fatality reduction after implementation of the plan.

Equity Analysis: Identify census tracts that are considered to be disadvantaged or lowincome and identify the bicycle and pedestrian needs of those disadvantaged or low-income residents.

Community Engagement: A description of the extent of community involvement in development of the plan, including disadvantaged and underserved communities.

Coordination: A description of how the plan has been coordinated with neighboring jurisdictions, including school districts within the plan area, and is consistent with other local or regional transportation, air quality, or energy conservation plans, including, but not limited to, general plans and a Sustainable Community Strategy in a Regional Transportation Plan.

Prioritization: A description of the projects and programs proposed in the plan and a listing of their priorities for implementation, including the methodology for project prioritization and a proposedtimelineforimplementation.

Funding: A description of future financial needs for projects and programs that improve safety and convenience for bicyclists and pedestrians in the plan area. Include anticipated cost, revenue sources and potential grant funding for bicycle and pedestrian uses.

Implementation: A description of steps necessary to implement the plan and the reporting process that will be used to keep the adopting agency and community informed of the progress
being made in implementing the plan.

Maintenance: A description of the policies and procedures for maintaining existing and proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities, including, but not limited to, the maintenance of smooth pavement, ADA level surfaces, freedom from encroaching vegetation, maintenance of traffic control devices including striping and other pavement markings, and lighting.

Resolution: A resolution showing adoption of the plan by the city, county or district. If the active transportation plan was prepared by a county transportation commission, regional transportation planning agency, MPO, school district or transit district, the plan should indicate the support via resolution of the city(s) or county(s) in which the proposed facilities would be located.
0 0
0 0
ATTACHMENT 1
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity
Active Transportation Plan
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 2
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 1DESCRIPTION OF PLAN AREA .............................................................................................................................. 1 LAND USES ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 2SCHOOLS ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Map of Plan Area .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3Map of Plan Area – Land Uses .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 5 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES ........................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Existing pedestrian facilities at US 101 crossings in the Plan Area ................................................................................................................... 5Map of Pedestrian Facilities Within the Plan Area ........................................................................................................................................... 6 BICYCLE FACILITIES ............................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Existing bicycle facilities at US 101 crossings in the Plan Area ......................................................................................................................... 7 Map of Bike Facilities Within the Plan Area ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Bicycle Share ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9Map of BCycle checkouts and destinations from June of 2023 ....................................................................................................................... 10 BCycle heat map from June of 2023 ............................................................................................................................................................... 11 BICYCLE PARKING ............................................................................................................................................................................... 12WAYFINDING SIGNAGE ....................................................................................................................................................................... 12NON‐INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAMS .................................................................................................................................................. 13MODE SHARE ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Map of Census tracts for Plan Area ................................................................................................................................................................ 15Map of Average Daily Pedestrian Trips in Plan Area in Fall of 2022 ............................................................................................................... 16 Map of Average Daily Bicycle Trips in Plan Area in Fall of 2022 ..................................................................................................................... 17

ATTACHMENT
2 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 3
COLLISION DATA / VISION ZERO ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................... 18 Map of Pedestrian and Bicycle Collisions Within the Plan Area (2007‐2022) ................................................................................................. 19 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ............................................................................................................................. 22 INITIAL COMMUNITY MEETINGS ........................................................................................................................................................ 22INITIAL SURVEY ................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Summary of Initial Survey Data: ..................................................................................................................................................................... 24 KEY FINDINGS OF INITIAL SURVEY ...................................................................................................................................................... 32 FEASIBILITY STUDY ............................................................................................................................................ 33 DESIGN CRITERIA AND STRUCTURAL ALTERNATIVES .......................................................................................................................... 34COST ESTIMATE .................................................................................................................................................................................. 38 ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ........................................................................................................ 39 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT .............................................................................................................................................................. 39SECOND SURVEY ................................................................................................................................................................................. 40 Summary of Second Survey Data: ................................................................................................................................................................... 41 KEY FINDINGS OF SECOND SURVEY .................................................................................................................................................... 48 PROPOSED PROJECTS ........................................................................................................................................ 48 LOWER EASTSIDE SAFETY ENHANCEMENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 48PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE OVERCROSSING ........................................................................................................................................ 49IMPLEMENTATION.............................................................................................................................................................................. 50OTHER PLANNED/FUNDED PROJECTS IN PLAN AREA ......................................................................................................................... 51 FUTURE MODE SHARE ....................................................................................................................................... 51MAINTENANCE ................................................................................................................................................. 53

ATTACHMENT
2 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 4
COORDINATION ................................................................................................................................................ 54 CONSISTENCY WITH PLANS AND POLICIES .......................................................................................................................................... 54AGENCY COORDINATION .................................................................................................................................................................... 54COMMITTEE REVIEW .......................................................................................................................................................................... 55 APPENDIX ......................................................................................................................................................... 56 SURVEY ONE: ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 56 Full Responses for Question 4, “What are your main destinations in these areas (e.g., parks, zoo, beaches, school, work, stores, restaurants, etc.)?” ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 56Full Responses for Question 5, "When walking between the Eastside and destinations south of the freeway, what routes work well?" .... 59 Full Responses for Question 6, "When biking between the Eastside and destinations south of the freeway, what routes work well?" ....... 63 SURVEY TWO: ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 66 Full Responses for Question 6, "Do you have any other comments about the overcrossing?" ...................................................................... 66 PLAN REQUIREMENTS PER ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (ATP) GUIDELINES ....................................................................... 70

ATTACHMENT
2 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 1
INTRODUCTION U.S. Highway 101 (US 101) is a physical barrier to walking and bicycling from the Lower Eastside neighborhood (Lower Eastside) to the commercial corridor and Waterfront (destinations south of US 101) with approximately 1.25 miles between the closest crossing points. Further, there is a lack of walking and bicycling infrastructure at some of the crossing locations, or within corridors leading to them. To identify ways to improve pedestrian and bicycle connectivity between the Lower Eastside and destinations south of US 101, the City of Santa Barbara (City) developed the Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan (Plan). The Plan builds upon previous public outreach and the City of Santa Barbara City Council (City Council) adopted plans, such as the 2006 Pedestrian Master Plan (PMP), 2013 Eastside Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan (Eastside NTMP), 2016 Bicycle Master Plan (BMP), and 2018 Santa Barbara Vision Zero Strategy (Vision Zero). The City received Active Transportation Program ‐ Cycle 4 grant funding in 2020 to study and plan for stronger pedestrian and bicycle access across US 101, and enhancements needed for connecting infrastructure. This Plan describes existing conditions and planned safety enhancements within the Plan Area, outlines the public engagement conducted, includes the Feasibility Study of a future pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing, and provides steps for Plan implementation.

DESCRIPTION OF PLAN AREA The Plan Area is focused on the Lower Eastside neighborhood, a disadvantaged community, and the mobility challenges created by poor access across US 101 to destinations south of the highway1. There is a 1.25‐mile gap between US 101 crossing points for the neighborhood, at Milpas and Cacique Streets in the west and Cabrillo Boulevard in the east. This is the largest gap in highway crossings within the City limits, with an average of 0.32 miles between crossings for the rest of the City. 1 U.S. Department of Transportation ‐ Equitable Transportation Community Explorer (link).

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 2
Land uses Land uses in the Eastside and Lower Eastside neighborhood include institutional uses (Eastside Library, Franklin Community Center, Franklin Elementary School, Cleveland Elementary School, Adelante Charter School), parks/open space (Eastside Neighborhood Park, Sunflower Park), single‐family, duplex, and multi‐unit housing, and commercial uses (retail, restaurant, auto‐services). Land uses in the Plan Area south of the highway primarily include multi‐unit housing, hotels, and open space and recreational destinations (Cabrillo Ball Field, Santa Barbara Zoo, Dwight Murphy Field, Chase Palm Park, East Beach).

Schools Schools within the Plan Area and north of the highway include Cleveland Elementary School, Franklin Elementary School, and Adelante Charter School. Cleveland Elementary School is the only elementary school located within the Plan Area that has a school attendance boundary extending both north and south of US 101. The school has 243 students with 76.5% qualifying for the free or reduced lunch program and approximately 30% of their students walk to school2. Franklin Elementary School has 441 students with 90.2% qualifying for the free or reduced lunch program, and approximately 40% of students walk to school3. Adelante Charter School is a Spanish‐English two‐way immersion elementary school and draws students from all of Santa Barbara, not just within the neighborhood. Adelante has 297 students, with 72.4% qualifying for the free/reduced lunch program. Currently, there isn’t mode‐share data for the school4. Santa Barbara Junior High School and Santa Barbara High School are just outside the Plan Area and many students who live within the Plan Area attend these schools. 2 California Dept of Education 2022/2023 (link); MOVE Santa Barbara County Annual Report 20233 MOVE Santa Barbara County Annual Report 20234 Ibid.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 3
Map of Plan Area
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 4
Map of Plan Area – Land Uses
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 5
EXISTING CONDITIONS Pedestrian Facilities A significant amount of pedestrian safety enhancements has been implemented within the Plan Area within the last 10 years. The community planning efforts that resulted in these infrastructure improvements are the City’s 2006 Pedestrian Master Plan (PMP) and the 2013 Eastside Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan (Eastside NTMP), which focused on the Safe Routes to School Program corridors leading to disadvantaged elementary schools (Franklin and Cleveland Elementary Schools). Safety enhancements constructed in these corridors include new access ramps, sidewalk infill, rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs), enhanced crosswalks, pedestrian refuge islands, a pedestrian/bicycle bridge at Cacique and Soledad Streets, and a bridge replacement with new or improved sidewalks over Sycamore Creek at Montecito and Quinientos Streets. Existing pedestrian facilities at US 101 crossings in the Plan Area  Cacique Street/US 101: As part of the US 101 HOV and Widening Project, the Cacique Street undercrossing was completed in 2012, providing an important connection for all modes of transportation within the Eastside to cross the highway. There is a sidewalk under the highway on both sides of the street with a parkway for about half of the block. At this crossing, pedestrians do not have to cross traffic as they enter onto or out of the US 101 ramps, however, they do have to cross the ramps if they continue south on the east side of Milpas Street toward the Waterfront. Based on community feedback, this is the preferred route for residents in the Plan Area to cross US 101, however, some have expressed concerns about unhoused/nuisance activities, trash, and not feeling safe in the undercrossing.  Milpas Street/US 101: At Milpas Street north of US 101, pedestrians must cross heavy traffic with vehicles entering or exiting a roundabout and highway ramps to get to the underpass. The underpass has sidewalks on both sides of the street. Based on community feedback, this is the second most utilized existing highway crossing for community members in the Plan Area, however, some expressed they avoid the roundabout due to heavy and fast traffic and homeless/nuisance activities. The City is evaluating the installation of RRFBs at the roundabout pedestrian crossings at the Milpas northbound on‐ramp and at Carpinteria Street with the Milpas Safe Crossings and Sidewalk Widening Project (funded by Active Transportation Program Grant ‐ Cycle 6).  Cabrillo Boulevard/US 101: There is an existing sidewalk connection under the US 101 northbound bridge and no sidewalk connection under the southbound bridge or railroad bridge. Pedestrians must cross heavy traffic turning onto or out of highway ramps. Based on community feedback, this is the least utilized route by pedestrians in the Plan Area, which was expected due to the gap in sidewalk connectivity. Pedestrian and bicycle improvements have been identified in the US 101 HOV and Widening Project, with interchange improvements to the East Cabrillo interchange through the East Cabrillo Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvement Project and Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) Bridge Replacement Project. The projects only have partial funding and need funding for final design and construction.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 6
Map of Pedestrian Facilities Within the Plan Area
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 7
Bicycle Facilities The development of the City’s 2016 Bicycle Master Plan (BMP) included community engagement resulting in several planned bicycle infrastructure improvements within the Plan Area. The most notable bicycle facility enhancements in the Plan Area are currently under construction with the Eastside Community Paseos Project, which is planned to be completed in 2023/2024. This project includes a new bike‐friendly street on Alisos Street as a safe alternative and parallel route to Milpas Street which is dominated by vehicular traffic. The Eastside Community Paseos Project also includes safety enhancements to existing east‐west cross‐town bike routes between the Eastside, Downtown, and the Westside neighborhoods.

Another important bicycle connection is the Cacique and Soledad pedestrian and bicycle bridge, which was completed in 2018. The bridge provides a connection from Soledad to Cacique Streets with an existing bike‐friendly route leading to the Cacique Street highway undercrossing.

Existing bicycle facilities at US 101 crossings in the Plan Area  Cacique Street/US 101: There is a Class II on‐street bike lane on both sides of the street on the Cacique Street highway undercrossing between Milpas and Alisos Streets. The approaches include a Class II on‐street bike lane on Milpas Street and a Class III facility (Bike Friendly Street or Bicycle Boulevard) on Alisos Street. Based on community feedback, this is the most popular existing highway crossing for residents in the Plan Area, however, busy traffic between the Cacique/Milpas intersection and south of the railroad tracks to get to the Waterfront was uncomfortable for some, especially families.  Milpas/US 101: There is a two‐lane roundabout north of the highway that bicyclists must enter to get to the Class II bike lane under the highway. Based on community feedback, this is not a preferred connection, as there is heavy traffic entering or exiting the highway within the roundabout.
 Cabrillo Boulevard/US 101: When traveling from north to south of the highway, bicyclists must navigate the Hot Springs roundabout to access a Class II on‐street bike lane to connect under the US 101 and railroad bridge. When traveling from south of the highway, there is an existing Class II on‐street bike lane on Cabrillo Boulevard that continues northbound under the railroad bridge and US 101 southbound bridge. At the northbound bridge, the bike lane continues adjacent to a Class I (separated path) that extends under the northbound bridge and adjacent to the Hot Springs roundabout. The path then returns to a Class II on‐street bike lane going westbound on Coast Village Road.

Based on community feedback, this was the second most preferred route for bicyclists.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 8
Map of Bike Facilities Within the Plan Area
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 9
Bicycle Share The City launched the three‐year pilot Bicycle Share Program (Program) in 2021 with BCycle as the vendor. Since launch, the Program has developed significantly and now provides the City with a widely utilized public transportation option. The pilot program has been extended to expire in 2026 with a total of 250 e‐bikes, 500 docks, and 78 different stations (grouping of docks) throughout the City as of September of 2023. There are approximately 11 stations in the Plan Area and BCycle data shows strong ridership trends between the Eastside, Downtown, and the Waterfront. The maps below show where the most bicycle checkouts occur in the Eastside and Downtown and where the most populardestinations are in the Waterfront south of US 101. The heat map below shows the most popular routes for BCycle riders. Within the Plan Area, the most popular routes are along Milpas Street and Cabrillo Boulevard.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 10
Map of BCycle checkouts and destinations from June of 2023 ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 11
BCycle heat map from June of 2023
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 12
Bicycle Parking The City provides public bicycle parking within the public right of way in commercial areas and near public resources (parks, libraries, shopping areas, etc.). The majority of City‐owned bicycle parking racks are called “bicycle hitching posts”, which provide two bicycle parking spaces per hitching post. There are also bicycle parking facilities called “bicycle corrals” in a few locations with higher bicycle parking demand. These facilities typically include larger groups of arch‐shaped racks in a row, located in either the street or parkway area. The City also maintains two fully enclosed and secure bicycle parking facilities located Downtown at 1219 Anacapa Street and 9 W. Figueroa (transit center), where residents who commute to the Downtown can apply for a monthly or annual membership. Bicycle parking in the Plan Area is concentrated along the Milpas Street commercial corridor, near the Eastside Library and Franklin Center, and adjacent to parks and recreational facilities in the Waterfront area. The narrow sidewalk widths along the Milpas Street corridor currently restricts the amount of usable bicycle parking locations. The Milpas Street Crosswalk Safety and Sidewalk Widening Project, which is planned for construction in 2027, will widen sidewalks near intersections and provide additional bicycle parking throughout the corridor.

In 2024, the City plans to inventory all public bicycle parking facilities and develop a City‐wide mapping database for these facilities.

Bicycle parking is required for multi‐family residential, commercial, and mixed‐use private developments per the City’s Zoning Ordinance and must be designed per the City’s Access and Parking Design Standards. The City maintains records of approved bicycle parking facilities for private developments within a permitting database and archived plans, however, these facilities are not mapped because they are for private use, and not public use.

Wayfinding signage Existing wayfinding signage for bicycle and pedestrian networks in the Plan Area are currently limited to regional bike network signage and includes Crosstown and Coastal Route signs used throughout the Santa Barbara County. Existing Crosstown signage is located near the intersections of Old Coast Highway and Salinas Street, Alisos and Hutash Streets, and Alisos and Mason Streets in the Eastside neighborhood. Signage for the Coastal bicycle route that extends from Ventura to Goleta/University of California, Santa Barbara, is posted in several locations along Cabrillo Boulevard. When the Eastside Community Paseos project is complete, new local bike route signage will be installed along Alisos Street and at key crosstown connections. Green bicycle sharrows will also be stenciled along the route.

If a new pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing were constructed, signage would be installed in the vicinity of the bridge route and approaches.

Bicycle sharrows would also be installed on Cacique and Canada Streets leading to the overcrossing.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 13
Non‐Infrastructure Programs Move Santa Barbara County (MOVE) is a local non‐profit whose mission is to promote walking, bicycling, and public transit county‐wide to create healthy, sustainable, and equitable communities. The City is partnered with MOVE to implement Safe Routes to School programs within the City, including public schools within the Plan Area: Cleveland Elementary School, Franklin Elementary School, Adelante Charter School, Santa Barbara Junior High, and Santa Barbara High School. The following summaries include recent efforts by MOVE to implement these programs:
 Cleveland Elementary School: In 2022/2023, MOVE attended Back to School Night to discuss pedestrian and bicycle access and safety issues. With the help of MOVE, Cleveland Elementary School plans to implement a bike skills class in the 2023/2024 school year.  Franklin Elementary School: MOVE has been training the Physical Education (PE) teacher at Franklin Elementary School to teach bike skills classes for the past five years. During the 2022/2023 school year, the PE teacher taught bike skill classes to kindergarten through six grade students. The school is also tracking mobility counts and transportation mode shift for their students.  Santa Barbara Junior High School: MOVE provided outreach for their Teen Transportation Justice program, an after‐school program for junior high and high school students interested in building skills to repair bicycles, being an advocate for transportation, and a confident cyclist.
 Santa Barbara High School: MOVE promoted the Teen Transportation Justice Program and discussed sustainable transportation barriers and walking and biking to school opportunities with students. The school is interested in assistance with a future bike mechanics program and an e‐bike safety class.

In the 2023/2024 school year, MOVE will offer all elementary schools a low‐cost helmet distribution, support organizing walk and bike to school days, train teachers for bike skills classes, and request mobility counts to track shifts in transportation modes. In coordination with the City, MOVE will also plan bike skills classes on the new bike friendly Alisos Street when the Eastside Community Paseos Project is complete. The City also plans to create short videos to highlight the purpose of the changes and how to safely use Alisos Street when walking, biking, or driving. These videos will be shared with all schools in the Plan Area and used for educational purposes. If a new pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing were constructed, the City would work with MOVE on similar informational and safety videos and in‐person instruction on how to safely walk and bike the bridge.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 14
Mode Share Residents in the Plan Area rely on active forms of transportation for their daily commute with an estimated 11.1% of the 2,982 workers aged 16 or older in census tracts 8.06 ‐ commuting to work by walking or bicycling5. Census tract boundaries in the Plan Area have changed since the Plan’s grant application was submitted in 2018. The census data in the application was from tract 8.04, which has since been divided into two different tract areas: tract 8.06 is located north of US 101 and generally includes the residential Lower Eastside neighborhood with some commercial uses and a population of 5,300; and tract 8.05 is located south of the highway and includes the East Beach neighborhood with hotel, commercial, and recreational uses, and a population of 1,100 people. This Plan focuses primarily on the mobility challenges created by the highway for the 8.06 tract located north of the highway, which is considered a disadvantaged census trac by the US Department of Transportation (USDOT) Equitable Transportation Community Explorer In addition to reviewing census data which focuses on daily work commute trips, the City looked at Replica, a “big data” platform which uses cell phone and land use data to provide statistics for all utilitarian trips via all modes of transportation, not just work commutes6. This data does not track recreational trips for walking or biking and only tracks trips with a staying period that is over five minutes in one location. Based on Replica data, the total average daily trips for all modes that originate in tract 8.06 in summer of 2023 is 16,300 trips, with approximately 10,000 private vehicle trips (61.3%), 2,800 auto passenger trips (17.2%), 2,500 walking trips (15.3%), 400 bicycling trips (2.5%), 400 “other” trips (delivery, rideshare, and freight) (2.5%), and 200 transit trips (1.2%)7. In the same time period, census tract 8.05 had a total of 13,200 average daily trips, with 9,300 private vehicle trips (70.5%), 1,300 auto passenger trips (9.8%), 1,600 walking trips (12.1%), 200 biking trips (1.5%), 100 transit trips (0.8%), and 700 “other” trips (delivery, rideshare, freight) (5.3%)8.

In addition to trips that originate in a specific census track, Replica data includes the average number of trips by mode that pass through a corridor.

The following maps from Replica summarize average daily biking and walking trips within the Plan Area for Fall of 2022. This data is consistent with what we heard from the community for their preferred routes: Cacique undercrossing to Milpas Street for walking and biking, and Old Coast Highway to Cabrillo Boulevard for biking. 5 U.S. Census Bureau Data (link). 6 U.S. Department of Transportation ‐ Equitable Transportation Community Explorer (link). 7 U.S. Census Bureau Data (link). 8 Ibid.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 15
Map of Census tracts for Plan Area
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 16
Map of Average Daily Pedestrian Trips in Plan Area in Fall of 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 17
Map of Average Daily Bicycle Trips in Plan Area in Fall of 2022 ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 18
COLLISION DATA / VISION ZERO ANALYSIS Santa Barbara Vision Zero Strategy (Vision Zero) is a strategy adopted by the City in 2018 that aims to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all. Vision Zero is about evolving our thinking about what causes traffic‐related collisions and what can be done to prevent them. Vision Zero is guided by seven core principles:

1. Life is Most Important 2. Every Person Matters 3. People Make Mistakes 4. Focus on Dangerous Locations and Behaviors

5. Drivers Have a Critical Responsibility 6. Pedestrians and Cyclists are the Most Vulnerable Road Users

7. The Government Shares Responsibility for Safe Streets The City conducted a Vision Zero traffic safety analysis for the Plan Area and used collision data from the Police Department to identify trends and recurring collision patterns. When collisions with similar characteristics are repeated several times, this may indicate a safety issue that could be corrected by an infrastructure improvement. The City found that over 75% of collisions resulting in severe or fatal injuries happened on less than 20% of City streets. Milpas and Salinas Streets and Cabrillo Boulevard have been determined as high collision corridors and also have the highest traffic volumes in the Plan Area. Currently, active transportation access between the Eastside and Waterfront requires using Milpas Street and Cabrillo Boulevard, and Salinas Street bisects the Eastside neighborhood, exposing active transportation users to high collision corridors.

The map below provides the location of all pedestrian and bicycle collisions within the Plan Area between 2007 and 2022, including those that resulted in a severe or fatal injury. Of the 15,533 total collisions that occurred in the City between 2007 and 2022, approximately 1,424 took place in the Plan Area. Of these collisions, 82 (5.8%) involved pedestrians and 131 (9.2%) involved bicyclists. Out of the total collisions that involved pedestrians and bicyclists (213), 16 pedestrian collisions and 9 bicyclist collisions (11.7%) resulted in severe or fatal injuries. Generally, collisions were spread throughout the Plan Area, but were more frequent along Milpas and Salinas Streets and Cabrillo Boulevard. These streets also have the highest traffic volumes in the Plan Area, so this was expected. When looking at existing US 101 crossings in the Plan Area, pedestrian and bicycle collisions have occurred at the Cabrillo Boulevard/US 101 ramps and at a higher rate at the Milpas roundabout and US 101 ramps. These crossing points are generally high stress locations for pedestrians and bicyclists to navigate due to friction with high vehicle volumes and speeds (Milpas/US 101 on and off ramps) and a lack of separation between vehicles and pedestrians (Cabrillo Boulevard).

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 19
Map of Pedestrian and Bicycle Collisions Within the Plan Area (2007‐2022) ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 20
In reviewing the collisions for the Plan Area, a few patterns were identified that suggest safety problems. The following are key findings from the City’s collision data analyses:
 Milpas Street Corridor: This corridor has the highest number of bike and pedestrian‐involved collisions in the Plan Area. The safety issues for pedestrians are conflicts with turning vehicles at the busy intersections along Milpas Street. The safety issues for cyclists are conflicts with turning vehicles at busy intersections and exposure to moving traffic due to a lack of physically separated bike facilities. To address these issues:
 Enhanced crosswalks with rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs) have been installed at Yanonali/Milpas and Ortega/Milpas Streets located further north in the corridor. In addition, the Milpas Safe Crossings and Sidewalk Widening Project, with construction planned for 2027, is being funded by Active Transportation Program Grant – Cycle 6 to provide the following safety enhancements at the intersections within the Milpas corridor between Quinientos and Canon Perdido Streets: curb extensions, high visibility crosswalks, additional lighting, accessibility improvements, widened sidewalks at street corners and transit stops, leading pedestrian intervals at signalized intersections, mast arm mounted RRFBs, and a median refuge island at one non‐signalized intersection. These enhancements will improve the safety and comfort of the walking approaches to the existing crossing. The City will also evaluate the installation of RRFBs at the roundabout pedestrian crossings at the Milpas northbound on‐ramp and at Carpinteria Street with this project.  North of Cacique Street, a bicycle‐friendly route or bicycle boulevard is funded and will be implemented in 2023/2024 on Alisos Street (parallel to Milpas Street, one block east) as a safe, comfortable alternative to riding on Milpas Street.  A northbound separated bike lane is planned and funded on Milpas Street between Hutash and Cacique Streets. Construction is anticipated in 2024.
 A lack of continuous, separated facilities between Cacique Street and Cabrillo Boulevard is a deficiency to providing an all‐ages and abilities route.
 Salinas Street Corridor: This corridor has the second highest number of pedestrian‐involved collisions in the Plan Area. The safety issues along Salinas Street are pedestrians crossing Salinas Street, and conflicts with vehicles turning at intersections. To address these issues:
 Safety improvements were recently implemented in this corridor, including RRFBs and enhanced crosswalks at Mason/Salinas and Cacique/Salinas Streets, and curb extensions and enhanced crosswalks at Old Coast Highway/Salinas Street.  Proposed safety features include the following: curb extensions and crosswalk improvements at Salinas/Clifton and Salinas/Hutash Streets; a compact roundabout at Salinas/Carpinteria Streets; a raised intersection at Salinas/Pitos Streets; and an enhanced lighting corridor along Salinas Street between the highway and the roundabout at the upper limit of the Plan Area.  Cabrillo Boulevard/US 101 crossing: A small number of pedestrian and bicycle collisions have occurred at Cabrillo Boulevard/Los Patos Way (the approach to the US 101 undercrossing) and at the Cabrillo Boulevard/US 101 undercrossing where there is currently a gap in the ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 21
pedestrian infrastructure and a narrow Class II bike lane. The City frequently receives requests from residents for safety along this stretch of Cabrillo Boulevard. To address this need:
 A new roundabout, including pedestrian and bicycle enhancements, at Cabrillo Boulevard and Los Patos Way is funded and will begin construction in late fall of 2023/early winter of 2024. The roundabout is the first phase of a larger project that includes replacing the existing narrow Union Pacific Railroad Bridge with a new bridge to accommodate multiuse paths and on‐street bikelanes. The project will fill in part of the existing gap for pedestrians and improve access for bicyclists. A future project is planned to finalize the connection under both US 101 bridges as part of the US 101 HOV and Widening Project.

The engineering solutions described above are expected to address the safety issues by:
 Curb Extensions: Curb extensions improve sight lines for pedestrians and drivers around parked vehicles and increase drivers’ stopping response time as drivers can detect pedestrians earlier. Curb extensions also reduce pedestrian exposure to moving vehicles by shortening the street crossing distance.  Rectangle Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs): Rapid flashing beacons are a proven treatment in our City – the yellow flashing lights alert drivers to pedestrian crossing activity and enhance safety at crosswalks.  Lighting: Crosswalk lighting provides an additional layer of safety for pedestrians crossing in the early morning and evening hours.  Neighborhood/Compact or Mini Roundabout: Roundabouts have a traffic calming effect on streets by reducing vehicle speeds using geometric design rather than relying solely on traffic control devices.  Raised Intersection: Raised intersections act like a speed hump, reducing vehicle speeds.  Bicycle‐friendly Street/Bicycle Boulevard:
 Low vehicular volume streets  Low vehicle speeds to create a low stress environment were cyclists of all ages feel comfortable riding in the middle of the street  Drivers can expect a neighborhood atmosphere In addition to the engineering solutions proposed within the Lower Eastside and at existing US 101 crossings or approaches, a new pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing would provide an alternative route with the following expectations:
 A high‐comfort and low stress facility for all ages and abilities that is separated from vehicular traffic.  Reduces walking and biking distances to destinations south of US 101 for most residents in the Plan Area.  Connects directly to recreational destinations (Dwight Murphy Field, Santa Barbara Zoo, etc.) and places of employment with the Waterfront.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 22
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Initial Community Meetings The City heard from the community about their experiences and comfort levels when walking and biking throughout the Plan Area through a combination of online and in‐person meetings, and online surveys between October of 2021 and May of 2023. In the fall of 2021, the City facilitated community outreach to learn the following: is there support from the community for the City to study the overcrossing location identified in the PMP; what is and isn’t working with existing bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure within the Eastside, and between the Lower Eastside and destinations south of the highway; and if there are other community suggestions that should be studied for improving connectivity. Bilingual noticing in English and Spanish for the public meetings were distributed by hard‐copy in homework folders and online notices to families at Franklin Elementary School, Adelante Charter School, and Cleveland Elementary School; hard copies through the Foodbank distributions at the Franklin Neighborhood Center in the Eastside Neighborhood; online posts on Nextdoor, Instagram, and the City’s News In Brief; and signage posted at several strategic locations throughout the Plan Area, including the East Beach neighborhood on the south side of US 101. The first public meeting was an online webinar on October 25, 2021, and included Spanish interpretation. During the webinar, City staff provided an overview of recently completed and upcoming bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure projects in the vicinity of the Plan Area to discuss existing connectivity and future needs to fill gaps in infrastructure. The webinar included interactive polling with eight questions to receive and document input from participants.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 23
A second public meeting was held in person outside the Franklin Neighborhood Center on October 30, 2021, with the same purpose and agenda as the online webinar. The meeting was an open house format with five interactive stations in English and Spanish where community members could ask City staff questions and discuss each issue and add comments on display boards. Spanish interpreters were on‐site to help facilitate the meeting.

Initial Survey In addition to the two community meetings, an English and Spanish survey was posted on the project webpage between October and December of 2021 and a total of 86 responses were received. The questions were a mix of free‐response and multiple‐choice questions.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 24
Summary of Initial Survey Data:

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 25
Question 2 – What is the nearest intersection to where you live? The map below summarizes the responses received for question two of both the initial and second survey. 86 responses were received for the initial survey and 81 responses were received for the second survey. 27 of the responses were unidentifiable and could not be mapped. 47 responses indicated areas outside of the Plan area. 93 responses indicated areas within the Plan area and are shown on the map. The map shows the number of responses per intersection.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 26
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 27
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 28
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 29
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 30
Question 7 – Themes of “When walking between the Eastside and destinations south of the Highway, what are the challenges?” * Full responses are available in the Appendix.

Question 8 – Themes of “When biking between the Eastside and destinations south of the Highway, what are the challenges?" * Full responses are available in the Appendix.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 31
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 32
Key Findings of Initial Survey The following list summarizes community input and emerging themes from the first webinar, in‐person meeting, and survey responses:
 The majority of community members who participated in the meetings and/or responded to the survey live or work in the Eastside.  64% of participants walk or bike as one of their primary modes of transportation when traveling to destinations south of US 101.  For those traveling from the Eastside to south of US 101, main destinations are recreational (beach, Santa Barbara Zoo, restaurants, parks, shopping).
 The preferred walking route between the Eastside and south of US 101 is through the Cacique undercrossing to Milpas Street; however, concerns about unhoused individuals were brought up as a deterrent to this location.  The preferred biking route between the Eastside and south of US 101 is the Cacique undercrossing to Milpas Street; however, busy traffic between the Cacique/Milpas Streets intersection and south of the railroad tracks was uncomfortable for some, especially families. Some preferred the bike route via Old Coast Highway to the Cabrillo undercrossing.  Some residents use Sycamore Creek to cross under US 101, and some had safety concerns about using this informal route within the creek bed.
 When walking between the Eastside Neighborhood and south of US 101, challenges described include: lack of lighting, missing or too narrow sidewalks (Cabrillo Boulevard undercrossing and Milpas Street), loud and busy traffic (Milpas Street), drivers speeding and/or not yielding at highway ramps and the Milpas Street roundabout, the distance, and feeling unsafe or unsanitary where there is unhoused activity in highway underpasses (Cacique Street undercrossing).  When biking between the Eastside Neighborhood and south of the highway, challenges described include: lack of lighting, speeding vehicles, lack of bike lanes or too narrow roadway (Cabrillo undercrossing), uncomfortable sharing the road with vehicles, lack of secure bike parking at destinations, and difficultly navigating roundabouts and getting through railroad crossings, especially for families.  There is strong support by the community for the City to move forward with studying the feasibility of an overcrossing between the intersection of South Canada and Pitos Streets and the vicinity of Dwight Murphy Field.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 33
FEASIBILITY STUDY The City’s 2006 Pedestrian Master Plan (PMP) Policy 1.4 states that the City shall work to eliminate US 101 as a barrier to pedestrian travel, and PMP Strategy 1.4.1 directs the City to identify opportunities to add pedestrian crossings. This Strategy specifically identifies a potential crossing between Pitos and Canada Streets in the Lower Eastside and Dwight Murphy Field, recognizing this is a large gap in the City limits where a new overcrossing would make sense. Through initial public outreach of the Plan, the community conveyed strong support for studying the alignment of a pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing in this location. Another recommendation from the public included an undercrossing of US 101 through Sycamore Creek, as some residents said they currently use the creek as a crossing point. An undercrossing at Sycamore Creek was not studied further due to safety, flooding, and local, state, and federal policies restricting development within riparian habitat areas and buffer zones, as well as development within the FEMA floodway. Following public outreach, the City contracted with an engineering consultant, Consor, in May of 2022 to provide a Feasibility Study (Study) including preliminary engineering, environmental, and survey services for the Plan. The engineering services included preparation of a structural feasibility analysis and conceptual design options for the overcrossing in the alignment the community supported. The environmental services included a preliminary geotechnical investigation, and preliminary biological resources, cultural resources, and hydraulic analyses. The survey work identifies existing topographical and right‐of‐way features and constraints in the Plan area. The full Study and appendices are included as an attachment to this Plan. The objectives of the Study include the following:
 Analyze the feasibility of constructing a structure to span US 101 and the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks without placing infrastructure within Caltrans or UPRR right of way;
 Provide three structure design alternatives and one overcrossing alignment;  Identify site constraints, including consideration of Sycamore Creek, UPRR railroad, US 101, and the Santa Barbara Zoo parking lot;  Study the hydraulic impacts of a pedestrian bridge over Sycamore Creek while also presenting an alternative that is compatible with future Santa Barbara County Flood Control improvements;
 Maximize structural efficiency while minimizing parking losses in the Santa Barbara Zoo parking lot;  Minimize right of way acquisition;  Assess how potential bridge and roadway options affect access to the Sunrise RV Park and Santa Barbara Green Mobile Home Park; and  Develop cost estimates that can be used to program the final design and construction phases.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 34
Design Criteria and Structural Alternatives When looking at project constraints and opportunities, the Study breaks down the overcrossing as having three distinct frames: the Northern Stacked Ramp structure located in the Lower Eastside neighborhood, the US 101 frame which crosses the highway, and the Sycamore Creek frame, which would bend 90 degrees over the Santa Barbara Zoo parking lot and connect to Dwight Murphy Field west of Sycamore Creek. The map below shows the preferred alignment of all three frames and summarizes the primary project constraints identified in the Study.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 35
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 36
Northern Stacked Ramp The Northern Stacked Ramp would be located at the intersection of Pitos and S. Canada Streets. This is the ideal location identified in the PMP and supported by the community due to the amount of right‐of‐way available and the crossing point being roughly in the center of the gap between highway crossings for the neighborhood. The Study proposes a ramp design that would fit within the existing right‐of‐way and not require private property land acquisition. There would be minor right‐of‐way acquisition, or an easement needed from Caltrans in an area outside of the highway mainline infrastructure. In addition, it would maintain secondary driveway access to Santa Barbara Green Mobile Home Park and would still meet maximum ADA grades. The ramp structure would be an oval configuration and designed to allow for adequate natural light and good visibility and sight lines for pedestrians and cyclists. The preferred design would include a 4.9% slope in most sections of the ramp with 1.5% level areas at each turn. During public outreach, a possible ramp alternative was discussed that could be steeper (8% with level landings every 30 feet), but shorter, with a smaller footprint. Community members supported the less steep option with the slightly larger footprint, which is shown in the rendering below. US 101 Frame The Study analyzes three structural alternatives for the US 101 frame: a single clear span, a two‐span, and a three‐span configuration. A single span configuration with no vertical supports within Caltrans or UPRR right‐of‐way is the preferred alternative. This option would include a 225‐foot‐long prefabricated steel truss that spans across US 101 and the railroad right of way without intermediate supports. The benefits of this option include: no supports required outside the City right of way, reduced number of columns and piles, and lower foundation costs. This design would ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 37
also have the lowest traffic control requirement on US 101 during construction, most aesthetic flexibility, reduced construction schedule, and less outside agency coordination and permitting needed. The cons of this option include long‐term maintenance for the streel truss, challenging lifts to place the truss elements, and a taller profile to accommodate vertical clearance requirements. The two other alternatives are described in more detail in the Study. Sycamore Creek Frame The preferred alignment for the Sycamore Creek frame would be a seven span structure beginning at Dwight Murphy Field on the west side of the creek and running for approximately 660 feet to the east and through the Santa Barbara Zoo parking lot, which is a City owned parking lot with Santa Barbara Zoo as the lessee. The length of the first span is constrained by hydraulic opening requirements and future flood control and creek restoration and widening projects along Sycamore Creek. The landing location in Dwight Murphy Field is designed to tie into the park’s future renovation project. It is desirable to maximize vertical clearance over the creek to minimize impacts to the riparian habitat and the floodplain, however, ADA maximum grades limit how quickly the structure can rise over the creek. There would be 82 feet of clearance between supports across the creek, which would also allow for future hydraulic capacity of 3,000 cubic feet per second. In addition to the creek being a significant constraint, this frame runs through the Santa Barbara Zoo parking lot which impacts parking spaces. It is anticipated that approximately five spaces would need to be permanently removed to accommodate support columns and an entire row of parking would be temporarily impacted during construction. The design aims to minimize impacts to parking by spacing out the support columns as much as possible.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 38
Two alternative alignments were also studied for the Sycamore Creek frame that would not require a new crossing over Sycamore Creek and would tie into the existing bridge that connects the Zoo to Ninos Drive. The purpose of analyzing these alternatives was to see if there were feasible alternatives to a new creek crossing and address Coastal Resource policies associated with proximity of new development to Sycamore Creek. Both alternatives would require significant loss of parking in the Zoo parking lot, some reconfiguration of circulation, and modifications to the existing Zoo bridge. These alternatives would result with greatest impacts to the Zoo operations and increase overall project scope and cost. They are discussed in more detail in the Study.

Cost Estimate The Study also provides future anticipated design and construction cost estimates for the overcrossing, including a comparison of three structural alternatives for the US 101 frame. In general, the structure cost estimates show that there is only a marginal difference between the alternatives when compared to the total project cost. The total project cost estimate for the preferred configuration (single span) option includes estimated design, City management, construction, construction engineering, contingency, and escalation to future design and construction years, and is estimated at $32.5 million.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 39
ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Community Engagement The City returned to the community in April of 2023 to share the findings of the draft Feasibility Study (Study) and conceptual design renderings.

Bilingual noticing in English and Spanish for the public meetings were distributed in the following ways: 100 hard copies distributed to businesses in the neighborhood for posting in storefronts; emails sent to attendees who signed in at previous outreach meetings; online posts on Nextdoor, Instagram, and the City’s News In Brief; and signage posted in several locations throughout the Plan Area, including the East Beach neighborhood on the south side of US 101. An online webinar on was held on April 5, 2023, and included Spanish interpretation. During the webinar, City staff presented the findings of the Study, shared the design concept renderings, and answered questions from the attendees.

An in‐person meeting was held on April 12, 2023, outside the Franklin Center, with the same purpose as the webinar. The meeting was an open house format with interactive stations in English and Spanish where community members could answer questions and discuss the Plan with staff.

Spanish interpreters were on‐site to help facilitate the meeting. The questions asked of attendees were aimed at determining how many residents would use a future overcrossing, how frequently, and for what purpose (e.g., to get to work, school, recreation, etc.).

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 40
Second SurveyIn addition to the two community meetings, a second online survey was launched between March and May of 2023. The survey was distributed through online media through the City’s News in Brief; news posts on the project webpage that went to all subscribers; to Franklin Elementary School through Parent Square; and through QR codes on physical signage placed throughout the community. This survey was available in English and Spanish with a total of 81 responses received. The questions were a mix of free‐response and multiple‐choice questions and are summarized below.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 41
Summary of Second Survey Data:

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 42
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 43
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 44
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 45
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 46
Select responses for Question 6 – Do you have any other comments about the overcrossing? * Full responses are available in the Appendix.

Favorable:Building human scale infrastructure, for walking and cycling, helps not only those who already walk and cycle but those who are on the fence or have never thought about doing so before. So much infrastructure is built for car driving without question, as if driving is the natural mode of transportation. The more pedestrian access to our city the better, thank you! Exciting! First and foremost Please make a sidewalk under the train tracks to connect Cabrillo and coast village road. If you build this pedestrian overcrossing it'll be great. But please make stairs or some rational way for able bodied people to get down without walking 2 blocks back and forth. great idea for the area, thank you for updates Great idea to help tie the beachfront to lower West Side! Great Idea. There should be more of them. I am in full support of increased access for east side/APS/Eucalyptus Hill families to the bike path, beach and downtown area via a safe 101 crossing. I currently walk my dogs to the beach via the underpass in Montecito and not only is it a long walk, but it’s sometimes a bit dangerous after dark. An overpass would be much more safe and many more people would utilize it, decreasing the crowded parking at the zoo and east beach. I am very enthusiastic about any infrastructure that increases walkability. It will increase my options of where to walk after work, how often I can walk to destinations on the weekend for recreation, and it is overall very exciting. I answered a survey a few years ago asking for an overcrossing here and it is very cool to see it considered! Now I would use it mostly for biking, so I hope that the proposed design is bike friendly. But I lived on the Eastside in high school and would walk my dog in this area ‐ back then I would have used this daily. An overcrossing like this is going to be so nice for people on the Eastside to access parks and beaches directly. Thank you for working on it! I live on the Eastside area with my two children, having such an accessible bridge would allow us to spend more time at the beach and the zoo. Currently our path to the beach is not the safest since we go have to cross Milpas St. and train tracks. We use our car for transportation, but this bridge will allow us to walk.

I'm broadly in favor!
Tener un puente sera mejor regalo par nuestra comunidad del lower East side ./ Having a bridge will be the best gift for our lower East side community.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 47
Not Favorable:I am a frequent bike rider. I don't think this bridge is necessary ‐ there are many safe, good and safe ways to cross the 101 from one side to the other ‐ I do it all the time. Maybe better use of money would be to upgrade bike lanes on Milpas for better access in this area. I am not in favor of an overcrossing. Not only is it an eyesore but what purpose does it serve? There is already a proposal / renovation for the Dwight Murphy Park, which is supposed to bring more traffic and people to the East Beach area. Now the city wants to compound this with more foot traffic? I do not feel that the city has the infrastructure and security for all these people. Additionally, how will residents be protected or will they be trapped in their homes because more people and cars in the area will make it more difficult to go run errands and / or enjoy their own neighborhood. These homeowners are paying high taxes to maintain a certain quality of life where they live.

I am somewhat concerned about increasing access from the north side of the freeway to the zoo and park. We already have a big problem with homeless near the zoo and the park. Living next to the zoo, in a controlled entrance development, I have still had two locked bikes stolen as have a number of others. I also really wonder who wants to come over from that side. I ride quite a lot and have not found that I needed to cross the freeway in between Olive Mill and Milpas. Besides, it is perfectly possible to go to the roundabout at Hot Springs and cross under the freeway and wind up next to the bird refuge, and close to the Zoo. Additionally, if the crossing is of the same design as the one that crosses over the highway near Pueblo st, it is too steep to ride up and given the too sharp corner, hard to turn. Since riding down puts one again at a sharp turn it is ill advised and it is difficult to control even walk down the down hill. We need safe streets for cyclists (check out the crossing at upper state over the freeway where there is suddenly no bike lane at all, just a free for all with traffic). but the one proposed here does not seem to be needed. It would eventually get filled with homeless then that overcrossing would b made unsafe and very scary to walk or jog alone. No Questions/Comments How much would it cost? I found the question "What is the nearest intersection to where you live?" to be a little confusing. Can you be more specific about the intersections you are referring to?
I use the Cacique St. underpass to walk this way. Would the proopsed route be safer or better? I'd rather see the money used for exercise equipment in the Eastside Park The Milpas roundabout is unsafe for bicycles. Going under 101 on Cacique street is the only other option but I feel that the Cacique/Milpas intersection is also not safe.

The project proponents should consider an undercrossing that not only provides better pedestrian/bike access but also cleans up the creek along Ninos Drive. This area has a history of heavy use by the unhoused, so instead of building a bridge over a blighted and poorly maintained area, perhaps the City should address both challenges simultaneously? ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 48
Key Findings of Second Survey The following list summarizes the community’s input and emerging themes from the community meetings and second online survey from March to May of 2023:
 The majority of community members who participated in the meetings and/or responded to the survey live or work in the Eastside.  The majority of those living in the Eastside were supportive of a new overcrossing.  The majority of those living in the Eastside said they would use a new overcrossing weekly or daily, and primarily for the purpose of going to recreational destinations (Santa Barbara Zoo, beach, Dwight Murphy Field)  Some respondents living in the East Beach neighborhood had concerns of having more foot traffic with the proposed overcrossing and unhoused activity in their neighborhood.

PROPOSED PROJECTS Proposed and funded pedestrian and bicycle projects are also shown on page 10, Map of Pedestrian Facilities Within the Plan Area, and page 13, Map of Bike Facilities Within the Plan Area. Lower Eastside Safety Enhancements The mobility barriers identified by the residents, and the City’s Vision Zero Analysis of the Plan Area, resulted in planned bicycle and pedestrian safety enhancements within the Lower Eastside neighborhood and corridors leading to existing crossing locations of US 101. The following list is a summary of planned bicycle and safety enhancements, followed by cost estimates for each enhancement:
 Safe Routes to School Safety Enhancements, including curb extensions for the intersections at Montecito/Voluntario, Montecito/Soledad, Quinientos/Voluntario, Quinientos/Soledad, and Carpinteria/Soledad.  Cacique to Canada Street Bike Boulevard/Bike Friendly Street, including curb extensions at Canada/Hutash, Canada/Punta Gorda and Cacique/ Voluntario to improve pedestrian crossings. This route connects to the existing Cacique/US 101 undercrossing and would also connect pedestrians and cyclists to the future overcrossing at Canada/Pitos.  Alisos Sidewalk Infill between Hutash and Cacique Streets ‐This would fill a missing link of sidewalk leading to the US 101 Undercrossing at Cacique Street, connecting pedestrians to and from commercial services along the Milpas Street Corridor and to the Waterfront.  Salinas Street pedestrian and lighting safety enhancements from Highway 101 Freeway Off‐Ramp into the neighborhood. Includes additional lighting throughout Salinas corridor, curb extensions at Clifton/Salinas; a compact roundabout at Carpinteria/Salinas; a ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 49
crosswalk, curb extensions and RRFBs at Hutash/Salinas; and a raised intersection for speed control from the highway off ramp at Pitos/Salinas.

Lower Eastside Safety EnhancementsLocation Enhancements Cost EstimateMontecito/Voluntario Curb Extensions, Crosswalks $486,000 Montecito/Soledad Curb Extensions, Crosswalks $486,000 Quinientos/Voluntario Curb Extensions, Crosswalks $486,000 Quinientos/Soledad Curb Extensions, Crosswalks $486,000 Carpinteria/Soledad Curb Extensions, Crosswalks $486,000 Cacique/Voluntario Curb Extensions, Crosswalks $486,000 Hutash/Canada Curb Extensions, Crosswalks $486,000 Punta Gorda/Canada Curb Extensions, Crosswalks $486,000 Salinas/Pitos Raised Intersection, RRFB, Crosswalks $931,500 Salinas/ Hutash Curb Extensions, RRFB, Crosswalks $607,500 Salinas/Carpinteria Compact Roundabout, Crosswalks $688,500 Salinas/Clifton Curb Extension on SE corner, Relocated RRFB, Crosswalk $243,000 Salinas Corridor Corridor lighting $1,514,797 200 S Alisos Sidewalk infill $324,000 Total $8,197,297 Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing In addition to the safety enhancements and with the support of the community, the most prominent project proposed in this Plan is a future pedestrian and bicycle highway overcrossing. The Feasibility Study (Study) attached to this Plan provides a detailed conceptual overcrossing design and identifies project constraints to be considered in the final design. The table below summarizes the total project costs, including estimated design, City management, construction, construction engineering, contingency, and escalation to future design and construction years. Detailed estimates are in Appendix D of the Study.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 50
New Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing Cost Estimate Design Cost $2,536,000City Management Cost $253,000Construction Cost $15,500,000Construction Engineering $2,325,000Construction Contingency (20%) $3,100,000Escalation to 2030 (5% per year) $8,805,000Total $32,519,000 Implementation The proposed Lower Eastside Safety Improvements and Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing were included in the City’s adopted Five‐Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2024‐2028. The CIP forecasts the City's capital needs over a five‐year period based on various long‐ range plans, goals, and policies, and includes a comprehensive listing of planned and projected capital project needs for the five‐year planning period. The CIP includes both funded projects and unfunded needs and is updated every two years. Caltrans and SBCAG have expressed an interest in assisting with grant applications to help implement the Lower Eastside Safety Enhancements since the project scope benefits Eastside residents getting to and from Highway 101 and would complement the improvements to the US 101 HOV and Widening Project. A potential funding source in 2024 is the SB1 Solutions for Congested Corridors Program that provides funding to achieve a balanced set of transportation, environmental, and community access improvements to reduce congestion throughout California. If the grant is successful, the City would design the enhancements and hire an outside contractor for the construction work, with a possible construction date of 2027. During the design process, the City would return to the community with public meetings to discuss and refine the proposed enhancements prior to the construction phase. No discretionary approvals by the City’s boards or commissions are anticipated for these enhancements, however, the project would go to the City’s Transportation and Circulation Committee (TCC) for review and input.

To implement the proposed pedestrian and bicycle highway overcrossing, there is a call for projects with the State’s Active Transportation Program (ATP) ‐ Cycle 7 in March 2024 with applications due in June 2024. Staff will require City Council authorization to apply for the grant. The Study attached to this Plan provides an informed analysis for final design and construction of an overcrossing that will help make the grant application stronger for this very competitive grant program. If successful, project design would begin in 2025 and construction would likely begin in 2029/2030, consistent with standard required timelines of the ATP Program. Both final design and construction would be facilitated through outside contractors. The City would maintain a project management role throughout the phases by leading community outreach efforts and obtaining discretionary approvals, such as a Coastal Development Permit, through required City processes.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 51
Other Planned/Funded Projects in Plan Area In addition to the projects resulting from this planning effort, there are several proposed and funded projects in various phases within the Plan Area that will address many of the safety issues identified by the community. These projects also fill in infrastructure needs for both walking and biking within the Plan Area. The table below summarizes the upcoming projects, the safety issues they address, and the status of the project.

Project Safety Issues Addressed Status Eastside Community Paseos Provides bicycle‐friendly route, or bicycle boulevard, on Alisos Street (parallel to Milpas Street, one block east) as a safe, comfortable alternative to riding on Milpas Street.

Funded by ATP Cycle 5, in construction phase and to be completed in 2023/2024.

Milpas/Hutash Intersection Improvements
Provides a separated northbound path in the 200 South block of Milpas Street where community members expressed concern for riding in bike lane adjacent to heavy traffic.

Funded by the Regional Transportation Program as mitigation for the US 101 HOV and Widening Project. Construction planned for 2024.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements on E. Cabrillo Boulevard and Replacement of UPRR Bridge Project addresses traffic operational and congestion concerns. Project also provides new multiuse paths and on‐street bike lanes to better connect the Eastside, Waterfront, and Coast Village neighborhoods.

Phase 1 includes a new roundabout and pedestrian and bicycle improvements at the intersection of Cabrillo Boulevard and Los Patos Way. Construction begins early winter 2024. Phase 2 includes replacing the UPRR Bridge at Cabrillo Boulevard and pedestrian and bicycle improvements. Currently not funded for construction. SBCAG/Caltrans/City is actively seeking funding.

Dwight Murphy Field Renovation
Includes sidewalk infill on entire perimeter of the park where none currently exists. Will provide separated facility for pedestrians and connectivity to future US 101 overcrossing.

Final design completed and grant application submitted. If successful, construction is anticipated to start in 2024 and last approximately 18 months.

Milpas Street Crosswalk Safety and Sidewalk Widening Project Provides new curb extensions, high visibility crosswalks, additional lighting, widened sidewalks at the intersections, and other enhancements throughout Milpas Street corridor to improve access for pedestrians across vehicle‐dominated Milpas Street and along Milpas Street from Quinientos to Canon Perdido Streets.

Funded by ATP Cycle 6. Project is in design phase with construction anticipated in 2027.

FUTURE MODE SHARE The proposed and planned pedestrian and bicycle projects in this Plan are expected to create higher comfort and low‐stress facilities and encourage more walking and biking as a primary mode choice. From a cost, infrastructure, and community transformational perspective, the ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 52
proposed pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing is anticipated to be the most impactful project within this Plan. Therefore, the focus on estimating potential shifts in mode share are associated with the proposed overcrossing. There are currently three pedestrian and bicycle US 101 overcrossings in the City limits: at Ortega, Anapamu, and Junipero Streets. The City studied these existing overcrossings to get a baseline for how often they are used by conducting camera counts of cyclists and pedestrians during a weekday and weekend day, summarized in the table below. The counts were conducted over 24‐hour periods, during the school year, and on non‐inclement weather days.

Ortega BridgeThursday, 4/6/23 Eastbound Westbound Daily Totals Pedestrians 115 104 219 Cyclists 81 56 137 Saturday, 4/8/23 Eastbound Westbound Daily Totals Pedestrians 140 94 234 Cyclists 73 65 138 Anapamu Bridge Thursday, 4/6/23 Eastbound Westbound Daily Totals Pedestrians 121 159 280 Cyclists 60 87 147 Saturday, 4/8/23 Eastbound Westbound Daily Totals Pedestrians 146 191 337 Cyclists 48 81 129 Junipero BridgeTuesday, 5/9/23 Northbound Southbound Daily Totals Pedestrians 116 109 225 Cyclists 64 66 130 Saturday, 4/29/23 Northbound Southbound Daily Totals Pedestrians 93 76 169 Cyclists 53 52 105 When looking at the daily trips on all three overcrossings, there were between 355 and 427 total pedestrian and cyclist trips on a weekday, and between 274 and 466 trips on a weekend day. The Ortega and Anapamu bridges connect the Westside and Lower West neighborhoods to the Downtown, with the Anapamu Bridge having the most daily trips. The slopes of the existing bridges do not meet ADA requirements, which may ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 53
discourage some cyclists and pedestrians from using the bridges. Further, the corkscrew design of the Anapamu bridge includes some visibility constraints that some have expressed as being a safety issue. The existing trip data can help us estimate the anticipated number of pedestrian and bicyclist trips expected if a new overcrossing were constructed in the Lower Eastside for a few reasons. The proposed overcrossing in the Lower Eastside would serve a neighborhood similar in demographics and density as the neighborhoods served by the Ortega and Anapamu bridges. The proposed overcrossing would have more gradual slopes and meet current ADA standard slopes, have an open design with no “blind” corners, and would provide a superior aesthetic and functional design compared to the existing overcrossings. These design factors would make the overcrossing an attractive choice for residents by providing a higher level of comfort and lower stress, versus the existing crossings locations. Although, destinations in the Waterfront tend to be more recreational destinations than those in the Downtown that are served by the Anapamu and Ortega bridges, there are also similar land uses such as hotels and restaurants, which also serve as places of employment within the Plan Area.

In addition to the camera counts, the majority of those who participated in the online community surveys and community public meetings indicated that a new overcrossing would encourage them to walk or bike more often and that they would walk to bike to destinations that they currently drive to.

MAINTENANCE Once constructed, the features of the Lower Eastside Safety Enhancements will be incorporated into various maintenance cycles. The pavement will be incorporated into the City’s Pavement Maintenance Program, which involves routine inspections of pavement conditions and accompanying maintenance treatments (point repairs, slurry seal, grind and overlay). Sidewalks and concrete features are incorporated into the City’s Sidewalk Maintenance Program which involves inspections for uplifts and accompanying maintenance treatments (padding, grinding, replacement). Traffic control features (signage, striping) are incorporated into the City’s inventory, and are inspected approximately every four years for condition, and continuously inspected for missing or damaged traffic control. A new pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing will require long‐term maintenance by the City. Utilizing a steel truss for the US 101 frame, the preferred alternative in the Feasibility Study (Study), will require a higher level of long‐term maintenance compared to a concrete structure due to painting requirements. Weathering steel does not require painting; however, this treatment is not recommended in an environment so close to the corrosive marine atmosphere. The Study recommends two layers of protection for the truss by galvanizing and painting the structural steel. It is anticipated that painting will be required every 20 years, requiring an encroachment permit with Caltrans and UPRR to obtain access for painting over their right‐of‐way.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 54
It's anticipated that graffiti removal will be required in the long‐term maintenance of the overcrossing. The City currently removes graffiti on public property and infrastructure, pursuant to the City’s Graffiti Removal and Abatement Ordinance, which would be applicable to the new overcrossing as well. In addition to graffiti removal, it is anticipated that occasional power washing will be required for portions of the ramps and bridge decks, which would be incorporated into the cleaning cycles for the existing overcrossings within the City limit.

COORDINATION Consistency with Plans and Policies The Lower Eastside Safety Enhancements and Pedestrian and Bicycle Overcrossing Projects proposed within this Plan are consistent with the Santa Barbara City Council (City Council) adopted Pedestrian Master Plan (2006), Climate Action Plan (2012), Bicycle Master Plan (2016), Eastside Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan (2015), Santa Barbara Vision Zero Strategy (2018), as well as the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG) Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy. Due to its proposed location with the Coastal Zone, the overcrossing would require a Coastal Development Permit prior to construction. The Feasibility Study looks at alternatives for the bridge alignment for consistency with the City’s Coastal Land Use Plan. Lastly, the City Council adopted the Five‐Year Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2024‐2028 on March 14, 2023, and these projects are included as a community need.

Agency Coordination Coordination with outside agencies including the Santa Barbara Unified School District, Caltrans, and Santa Barbara County Flood Control, were a key component of the planning effort. The School District was a primary outlet for public outreach and information distribution when the City held public meetings. Further, the elementary schools within the Plan Area provided mode share statistics about their students to MOVE Santa Barbara County that are informative for this effort. The City and Consor, the engineering consultant for the Feasibility Study (Study), held coordination meetings with Caltrans on August 24, 2020, and March 16, 2023, while developing the Study. Caltrans provided input on the structural alternatives, which helped determine the preferred alternative (single span with no supports in Caltrans right‐of‐way). Caltrans also provided input on anticipated construction constraints and methods, utility considerations, right‐of‐way acquisition, permitting processes, and maintenance agreements. Additional coordination will be needed with Caltrans early in the design phase of the overcrossing. Early coordination with Union Pacific Railroad is also necessary in the design phase since the overcrossing would cross over the railroad right‐of‐way.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 55
The City and Consor also met with Santa Barbara County Flood Control staff and City Creeks Division staff while developing the Study to discuss a planned creek widening project and hydraulic issues associated with Sycamore Creek. While the exact limits of the future creek improvements project are not yet known, conversations with Santa Barbara County Flood Control staff resulted in concurrence that an 82‐foot span over Sycamore Creek would be a reasonable assumption to avoid conflicts as stated in the Study. This issue is discussed in detail in the Study. Further coordination will be needed with both the Santa Barbara County Flood Control and the City’s Creeks Division when the project is in the design phase. In addition to outside agency coordination, internal City coordination with the Parks and Recreation Department, Community Development Department, and Sustainability and Resilience Department helped to shape and inform this Plan. In particular, the design of the pedestrian overcrossing will continue to be coordinated with the Dwight Murphy Field Renovation Project and a future Sycamore Creek widening project.

Close coordination with the City’s Community Development Department will be needed since a future overcrossing would need approval of a Coastal Development Permit in the final design phase and the Department oversees Coastal Policy Review and the Local Coastal Plan.

The City has also met with the Santa Barbara Zoo (Zoo) staff, who currently hold a long‐term lease with the City for the Zoo parking lot. Zoo staff provided support for the preferred overcrossing alternative that runs adjacent to the Zoo parking lot along the northern property line, then crosses over Sycamore Creek, because it minimizes impacts to their parking and circulation. They also support construction techniques recommended in the Study, such as cast‐in‐drilled‐hole (CIDH) piles for the structural foundation, which would minimize noise for sensitive wildlife receptors at the Zoo. Ongoing coordination with the Zoo for a final design and construction will be required.

Committee Review The Plan was reviewed by the Transportation and Circulation Committee (TCC) three times throughout the Plan’s development. In February of 2022, the TCC heard an overview on the planning process, key findings from the initial public outreach efforts, and the next steps for the Plan. In February of 2023, the TCC received an update on the key findings of the Study and provided questions and input to further refine the Study. The TCC reviewed the Draft Plan on October 26, 2023. Some Committee members expressed concern for the estimated cost of a future overcrossing, however, overall, the TCC supported the Plan and made a recommendation to proceed to City Council for Plan adoption.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 56
APPENDIX Survey One: Full Responses for Question 4, “What are your main destinations in these areas (e.g., parks, zoo, beaches, school, work, stores, restaurants, etc.)?” Recreation (beach, Zoo, restaurants, parks, shopping) Beaches, restaurants Stores, restaurants. Zoo, Beaches, Funk Zone, Restaurants. Harbor, skatepark, waterfront in general restaurants, beach, bird refuge I liked to bike to beach ‐ but stopped because it is too dangerous from all pathways to the beach from my house. Now I just walk in the neighborhood. Zoo, restaurants Beaches, stores, restaurants zoo, eastside beach, access to coastal bike path Muller Aquatic Center, restaurants, beach East Beach/volleyball courts area Park, beach, restaurants, harbor etc stores, recreation, Beaches, zoo and bird refugee east beach or leadbetter or state street Beaches, parks and stores. Beaches food trucks Parks, beaches, stores, restaurants. Beach, parks Beach Parks, beaches, stores and restaurants. Harbor, Wharf east beach and Dwight murphy park Beaches and restaurants Beach, friends and family, restaurants Beaches ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 57
State Street by way of the beach east beach Coastal bike path. east beach Stores, restaurants, beaches, recreational areas and parks beaches, pickleball courts, parks, friends on the eastside From home to beach. Beach Beaches East beach, Estuary Beach and bike path Beach, restaurants Zoo and Beach Beaches, restaurants East Beach Beaches, restaurants beaches, parks and restaurants Dwight Murphy Park. I work for Parks and Rec and run many youth sports at Dwight Murphy Park. Lots of kids make their way to and from the Park from the Eastside neighborhoods. There is no easy and safe way for these kids. Beaches, zoo, parks, restaurants Parks, beaches, restaurants downtown shopping parks and beaches, zoo, restaurants. stores, beaches Zoo, beach, Chase Palm Park, Dwight Murphy field Beach Beach and parks. beach, zoo, bird refuge, restaurants Exercise, stores, restaurants, cemetery, bird refuge, beaches Zoo, beach Beach, stores, restaurants Stores, recreational bike rides, beach Bird refuge, beaches, Palm Park Beaches, bike path, kids playgrounds and skate park with my children stores ‐ occasionally a meal at the breakwater, drive to Tri County Produce East Beach, Zoo, Funk Zone, Hilton, Convivo, Bird Refuge.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 58
Beach, Downtown Beaches, restaurants bike route to downtown, parks, beaches Beach Beaches, Parks, and restaurants Beaches, stores, and restaurants Playas y restaurantes/ Beaches and restaurants Recreation and Utilities (Work, school, groceries) beaches/volleyball courts, stores like tri‐county produce, funk zone, pier Own property in El Escorial/East Beach. Zoo, East Beach, Sterns Wharf, Tri‐County Produce, Bird Refuge Beach, work, restaurants, stores Trader Joe's, Beach, Sanguis Winery, Milpas restaurants, Tri‐Counties, Cabrillow Boulevard walking paths Work, grocery store, restaurants, parks Beaches, parks, restaurants, stores, zoo, school Beach, Tri County Produce, downtown, farmers market, Home Improvement Center, Tri‐County Produce, Trader Joes Beach, stores, restaurants and work Beaches (recreation) and work on the southside of the freeway, home and shopping on the other. Beach, school, parks and restaurants East beach, butterfly beach, tri county produce store, zoo, bird sanctuary for bike rides, motel 6 when friends visit from out of town Food, shopping, work sometimes, beach, visiting friends & family Parks,school, trader Joe's, sprouts, Carl junior, gas station, ride aid, Beach, grocery store Zoo, East Beach Park, Dwight Murphy Park, East Beach, Convivo, Tri County Produce, The Double Tree Hotel, the bird refuge. Work, restaurants, Funk Zone, State Street shops, Tri‐County, East Beach Tacos, Sprouts, Montecito shops, bird sanctuary Mostly park and beaches, but also work at schools.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 59
Full Responses for Question 5, "When walking between the Eastside and destinations south of the freeway, what routes work well?" * indicates responses mentioning safety or general concerns.

Milpas and Cacique Connections Via the roundabout if you don't mind the cars, otherwise under the Cacique bridge or Cesar Chavez/Quarantina but the dump/wastewater smells too bad to take this way. Milpas, although it is a little intimidating because of high traffic and homeless people Cacique and Millais underpass Milpas at roundabout but it has problems of traffic, homeless population etc Walk to the Cacique 101 underpass, then south on Milpas Street.Both the ped underpass in Montecito and the Milpas st access work well enough for pedestrians although they are not necessarily convenient. Milpas underpass the milpas round about sidewalk walk down old coast hwy make a right on Salinas street then walk to Hutash Street then walk down to Voluntario St then left on Cacique to Milpas. Either Alisos, Garden or Milpas under the freeway but they all feel unsafe Milpas. Only option. Milpas street Cacique Milpas State Street or Milpas Street most of the time i walk the sycamore creek under the 101. its usually dry and but has very low head clearance. otherwise i go down cacique st to milpas
Very few routes work well. The section of Cabrillo which goes under the 101 and connects to Coast Village Rd. and Old Coast Highway is absurd for its lack of planning and safety. If I shlep the 1.25 miles over to Milpas, there are busy freeway onramps to navigate. However, the underpass at Cacique streets has wonderfully wide sidewalks that are safe to walk and bike on. The only problem is that its not very well lit. Milpas but a safer path for bikes. My kids can't bike themselves because Milpas is so dangerous. Straight down Cacique I have to walk/bike under the overpass to turn left on milpas. If I could turn left blocks earlier before the overpass it would be so much easier. I have talked about this a lot and am very happy to see a survey about it. When my partner and I wanted to bike to the zoo, we couldnâ€™t believe how close it was (just minutes) but how we had to bike all the way around it to milpas and down cabrillo and back to get to the entrance.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 60
Milpas is the only safe route in my opinion, especially at night. milpas is the only one route really The only route for us is too walk through the Eastside neighborhood to the Cicque St. underpass. We used to walk quite often but the condition of the underpass often causes us to drive to the area around the Hilton and then walk downtown or along the beach. It definitely feels ridiculous to have to drive to walk at the beach when we are only 6 blocks away. Several of those blocks are among the least attractive and inviting areas of the whole city. I have to take the underpass of the 101 and have to take Milpas where there is always lots of traffic. Under the freeway at Cabrillo to Coast Village Road Milpas or through the old coast freeway Soledad/ Cacique foot bridge to milpas and then to east beach Milpas to Cabrillo I typically go down Alisos and cross under the bridge at Milpas & Cacique as it feels the safest and I avoid the roundabout. I have to go via the very busy intersection at Milpas and Cacique. Sometimes I go along Old Coast Hwy but that takes a lot longer. cacique to milpas, down milpas to cabrillo Nothing. Milpas is slightly better now with Casique. Or it's around the Bird Refuge, which has the potential to be good, along cacique to milpas and then down milpas to cabrillo or walking along eastside sts. to town (seldom) I walk on the bridge on Cacique under the overpass to Milpas. It is best to avoid the Milpas roundabout I use the Cacique bridge to Milpas to get to the beach. The cacique underpass. Walking under the casi que underpass although it is ridden with transient activity and feels unsafe, then proceeding down lower milpas to desired destinations Cacique through the pedestrian bridge then under the freeway to Milpas, Milpas bike lane down to the bike path. Milpas. Flat route under the freeway so good for walking Walking under the Cacique under pass to Milpas, though it is riddled with transient activity, debris and often, feels unsafe. I go down Carpinteria to Milpas then down to the beach. This does NOT work well. It is high traffic, and under the bridges feel sketchy (my wife won't walk under them) and not very bike friendly. Under the bridge on Milpas St & Carpinteria St is the fastest route but itâ€™s sketchy with homeless people underneath down Cacique to Milpas, then down lower Milpas Quinientos/Carptinteria to Milpas. I usually take Milpas down to the beach walking, however am overwhelmed by the traffic on the roundabout before the underpass to get across the 101. I feel as if it would benefit the community a lot to provide a safer, more walkable way to get to east beach.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 61
Not Applicable I don't walk in this area. I do not walk I don't walk near the under crossings of Cacique or Milpas ‐ lots of trash and people panhandling and hanging out in these areas. I dont walk I am disabled and don't walk to destinations. i'm always on a bike Sidewalk. I do not walk to beach I donâ€™t usually walk By the bridge where the bakery is I drive however it be I walk the neighborhood most days Along the beach and/or Cabrillo where there are the least amount of cars and it is pretty and relaxing. I don't walk these routes. No Routes Work WellThe options are not great and feel dangerous, especially with our daughter. Biking or walking requires navigating the milpas/carpinteria roundabout or the busy cacique/milpas intersection, plus crossing the 101 ramp/milpas intersection. I used to walk under the freeway overpasses, but they became too dirty and congested with homeless encampments Very little walking in neighborhood. We do our walking at the beach. Milpas St. sidewalks are to narrow, dirty, uprooted and too many individuals not respecting the No Sit and Lie Ordinance. Work at all, not well. Cacique, Milpas, Salsipuedes Unsafe to walk None work well! Cacique to Milpas has heavy traffic. Lots of homeless people. Quite dirty and not feeling safe at all None There is not an ideal route. We have a child and it is very dangerous to push a baby carriage under the bridge on Cabrillo so we typically have to drive. Plus the route is 1.5+ miles. In going through the neighborhood, there are several congested areas along Milpas and sidewalks without ramps that make it difficult to navigate.

None work well currently. Very long detour to get to the zoo which is 200 yards from my home Hot Springs Road route is very pedestrian unfriendly Too hard to walk there Thereâ€™s none We are in the middle about 2 miles either way None really, all are too far from the house, busy, and loud to be a pleasant walk. This is why I bike.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 62
Cabrillo Boulevard ConnectionOld Pacific Coast Hwy to Cabrillo. Most direct route to East Beach. Old Coast Highway to Cabrillo underpass, though there is a lot of traffic and the underpass sometimes seems unsafe: Cars going fast next to pedestrians crossing under the bridge. Cars go way too fast on Old Coast Highway (65 mph plus); there should be better traffic control and policing. cabrillo to cold springs Bike path to Coast Village Road. I go from my home to the Round About at Hot Springs Rd. then under the freeway I sometimes bike under the 101 freeway or use the underpass tunnel in Montecito but drive there and then walk Old coast Hwy es la mejor ruta para llegar a la playa / Old coast Hwy is the best route to get to the beach.OtherGarden Street underpass From the funk zone, Garden/Calle Cesar Chavez or Anacapa. Milpas works also but I avoid it by foot because it's such a busy road. Route from Cabrillo to Meigs to Carrillo. Also take State to Anapamu footbridge to cross the freeway. I have mobility problems, and I also walk my dog to the beach and parks. Walking on Cesar Chavez is easiest for me. Wide sidewalks and walk underneath the 101 with out the big dips on Garden and State St. I generally cross over at Cesar Chavez and Castillo.

I usually walk or ride my bike to the beach on State Street or Quinientos. I usually walk down State Street, because the Milpas underpass is a little scary for pedestrians. Both (Milpas and Cabrillo Blvd. Connections)I often run a loop down old coast highway, under the 101 at Cabrillo, and the back up Milpas / Cacique to the east side. Most of this run is fine with sidewalks and bike paths. Cacique to Milpas or Old Coast Hwy to Coast Village Rd then unpass at the Chevron Station ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 63
Full Responses for Question 6, "When biking between the Eastside and destinations south of the freeway, what routes work well?" * indicates responses mentioning safety or general concerns.

Milpas and Cacique Connections I bike with my family down Soledad to Cacique, under the Cacique 101 overpass, and then down Milpas to the waterfront often. Highlights are the new bridges at Soledad and Cacique, and the safe biking in general through the east side. I pedal on Cacique thru Funk Zone. Less traffic and itâ€™s a more direct route. The only route I found that is not as dangerous is riding on the sidewalk ‐ or down Soledad Street across the bridge down Cacique (which is scary) then down Milpas (so much traffic though). Cacique and milpas underpass Soledad to Cacique to Milpas to bike path Cacique underpass to Milpas. Also problems of traffic and homeless popukation Bike to the Cacique 101 underpass, then south on Milpas Street.The Milpas st access work â€œwellâ€ but I donâ€™t consider it safe for new bike riders or small children. It is really important to be vigilant of cars. The access at Garden, State sts are ok.

Cacique to Milpas Either Alisos, Garden or Milpas under the freeway but they all feel unsafe Milpas street Milpas State Street and Quinientos. I also ride my bike on Milpas. I am less comfortable on Garden and Castillo because of the Freeway on/off ramps. cacique st, under the 101 to milpas Again, the Cabrillo underpass infrastructure is absurdly lacking. Milpas is too busy and scary for me. Therefore, I end up using Cacique. Almost everything is Cacique to Milpas to Cabrillo milpas is really the only one The same route to the Cicque St. under pass. Milpas St. round about is not safe for bicycle traffic. cacique connector bridges and underpass There is no other route I can take and always have to travel through the underpass and Milpas. Cacique/Milpas underpass does not have bike path. Dangerous to cross at crossing. Narrow Milpas with heavy traffic. Feels unsafe Same as walk Soledad/ Cacique foot bridge to milpas and then to east beach. Milpas to Cabrillo ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 64
Again, down Alisos and cross under the bridge at Milpas & Cacique as it feels the safest and I avoid the roundabout. Mostly the route along Milpas cacique to milpas, down milpas to cabrillo along cacique to milpas and then down milpas to cabrillo bike path or up to cota st. and then into toen along cota bike lane I take the bridge on Cacique to Milpas to avoid the Milpas roundabout Cacique under crossing works well but is far away and only cuts out three blocks over Milpas roundabout route. Hot springs is far away and not very safe for bicycles (nor pedestrians) I use the Cacique bridge to Milpas to get to the beach. Generally I am headed north/west on the coast so I go the more direct route for me: under the Cacique bridge and left on Milpas. Despite the business of the intersection this works for me because I am a confident and regular cyclist.

Same as above but dangerously Cacique under the freeway to Milpas, Milpas to waterfront Milpas. Flat route under the freeway so good for cycling, Milpas Street and entering the round about but it does not feel safe for all parties in my family. I go down Carpinteria to Milpas then down to the beach. This does NOT work well. It is high traffic, and under the bridges feel sketchy (my wife won't walk under them) and not very bike friendly. Under the bridge on Milpas St & Carpinteria St also Milpas St and Cacique St. down Cacique to Milpas, then down lower Milpas Quinientos/Carptinteria to Milpas. Milpas st down to east beach, however again the traffic in this area does not make it safe especially through the roundabout. I typically bike from Salinas down Punta Gorda over to Cacique and then down Milpas if going to the beach area. Punta Gorda to the Cacique underpass works well.

Not Applicable Don't bike at all. Don't bike  NA don't bike I donâ€™t bike don't bike I don't bike I do not bike N/A Do not bike I do not ride bike ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 65
N/A  I drive dunno
Cabrillo Boulevard Connection I will usually go up and around via Alisos to Montecito to Salinas to Old Coast Highway because I don't have to stop as much for cross traffic (except on Alisos) and there is a bike lane on Old Coast. Going under the Garden underpass works too but there is too much cross traffic and no good bike lanes. Going through the neighborhood/Cacique is not great because there are too many short blocks with fast‐moving cars to navigate, have to get off the bike a lot and it feels dangerous, and the left turn to get onto Milpas can take forever. Cesar Chavez area smells too bad because of dump/wastewater. Old Coast Hwy to Cabrillo. Most direct route to pick up bike path on Cabrillo at the Bird Refuge. I try to stay off of Milpas because it's so busy and there is no appropriate bike lane until after the round about. Calle Cesar Chavez or to Montecito I take Cacique then along the golf course. Montecito way Same route as above cabrillo to cold springs Same as above When I bike to Coast Village Road, I use the bike path and then the sidewalk or bike path on the street on CVR I go from my home to the Round About at Hot Springs Rd, then under the freeway under the 101 from the round about at Montencito Mart  Old coast to hot springs / Carrillo I bike along the beach and/or Cabrillo almost everyday where there are the least amount of cars and it is pretty and relaxing or I zigzag through these neighborhoods always looking for safe bike lanes. I also, love the bike lane, situated safely away from the cars, along the bird refuge and enjoy biking with my family to Butterfly beach.

Old Coas Hwy
No Routes Work Wellnone because there is not enough bike friendly infrastructure in such a high traffic area Same as above. Same as walking Unsafe to bike Make a path along milpas but a safe bike path. None No biking is scary on that direction because of the entrance of the freeway and all the car going fast ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 66
Similar to above, we use both routes, but the road is so narrow under the bridge at Cabrillo that it feels dangerous and the area around Milpas and Cacique is challenging for cyclists.

Nothing. It's either Milpas, which is slightly better now with Casique. (Would be more functional if Alisos became a true bike blvd‐ which is for peds too). Or it's around the Bird Refuge, which has the potential to be good but is truly horrible going around the roundabout and under the freeway where there is that dangerous grate in the middle of the bike lane. Too hard to bike there Other Garden Street Underpass Calle Cesar Chavez. Safer than Milpas Street. Route from Cabrillo to Meigs to Carrillo. Also take State to Anapamu footbridge to cross the freeway. Cota St. bike lane I usually bike down State Street, because the Milpas roundabout and underpass is a little scary for bicyclists. Calle cesar ChÃ¡vezBoth (Milpas and Cabrillo Blvd. Connections) 1)Walk down old coast hwy make a right on Salinas street then walk to Hutash Street then walk down to Voluntario St then left on Cacique to Milpas. 2) Ride southbound on Old Coast hwy. make a right onto Cabrillo and use the beach path adjacent to the Lagoon.

Survey Two: Full Responses for Question 6, "Do you have any other comments about the overcrossing?" Favorable: Building human scale infrastructure, for walking and cycling, helps not only those who already walk and cycle but those who are on the fence or have never thought about doing so before. So much infrastructure is built for car driving without question, as if driving is the natural mode of transportation. The more pedestrian access to our city the better, thank you! Exciting! First and foremost Please make a sidewalk under the train tracks to connect Cabrillo and coast village road. If you build this pedestrian overcrossing it'll be great. But please make stairs or some rational way for able bodied people to get down without walking 2 blocks back and forth. great idea for the area, thank you for updates Great idea to help tie the beachfront to lower West Side! ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 67
Great Idea. There should be more of them. I am in full support of increased access for east side/APS/Eucalyptus Hill families to the bike path, beach and downtown area via a safe 101 crossing. I currently walk my dogs to the beach via the underpass in Montecito and not only is it a long walk, but it’s sometimes a bit dangerous after dark. An overpass would be much more safe and many more people would utilize it, decreasing the crowded parking at the zoo and east beach. I am very enthusiastic about any infrastructure that increases walkability. It will increase my options of where to walk after work, how often I can walk to destinations on the weekend for recreation, and it is overall very exciting. I answered a survey a few years ago asking for an overcrossing here and it is very cool to see it considered! Now I would use it mostly for biking, so I hope that the proposed design is bike friendly. But I lived on the Eastside in high school and would walk my dog in this area ‐ back then I would have used this daily. An overcrossing like this is going to be so nice for people on the Eastside to access parks and beaches directly. Thank you for working on it! I live on the Eastside area with my two children, having such an accessible bridge would allow us to spend more time at the beach and the zoo. Currently our path to the beach is not the safest since we go have to cross Milpas St. and train tracks. We use our car for transportation, but this bridge will allow us to walk.

I no longer ride a bicycle or walk long distances but in those days my husband and I would have used such a crossing. I support this project and am in favor of funds going towards it. Every time people‐focused infrastructure like this is made a priority it contributes to strengthening walking/biking culture and habits which is good for all of us. If a crossing between 154 and Turnpike could be next in line after this one, that would be great â€” if we had one now I would definitely be using it regularly! I think this is a great idea. The areas that would be connected have been too isolated I would love it. I walk down sycamore canyon daily under the 101 freeway to get to the beach. I would welcome the walking bridge! I avoid walking to beach via Milpas underpass for safety reasons. If you build it they will come. The more ped/bike friendly the better. It would improve bike safety and shorten commutes between Eastside and beach considerably. It’s a great idea. So much safer than having to navigate the Cacique at Milpas intersection. Ten thumbs up! It’s important to ke we p improving our community. This would be a welcomed addition. Safer access for walking and biking around the city makes it more liveable for all residents Safer get off of milpas st and roundabout. Also what about prposed bike boulavsrd on alisos st? SB is not friendly enough to pedestrians and bicycles, this would be a great addition Solves a big gap in getting to the waterfront This is a long overdue infrastructure project for the residents of the East and Lower Eastside Neighborhood. I hope it can be done in a timely manner. This is one of the last areas disconnected from easy access to the beach, and would greatly benefit the community! Really hope this goes through ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 68
This would be great ‐ we currently have to take Milpas to get to the beach with the kids on bikes or to go running. I'd love to have this as an option .

This would shorten my commute to work and the beach. I have to go around the highway at cacique x Milpas every time I head that direction. I'm broadly in favor! Very hopeful about the prospect of this! Tener un puente sera mejor regalo par nuestra comunidad del lower Eat side ./ Having a bridge will be the best gift for our lower East side community.

Not Favorable: I am a frequent bike rider. I don't think this bridge is necessary ‐ there are many safe, good and safe ways to cross the 101 from one side to the other ‐ I do it all the time. Maybe better use of money would be to upgrade bike lanes on Milpas for better access in this area. I am not in favor of an overcrossing. Not only is it an eyesore but what purpose does it serve? There is already a proposal / renovation for the Dwight Murphy Park, which is supposed to bring more traffic and people to the East Beach area. Now the city wants to compound this with more foot traffic? I do not feel that the city has the infrastructure and security for all these people. Additionally, how will residents be protected or will they be trapped in their homes because more people and cars in the area will make it more difficult to go run errands and / or enjoy their own neighborhood. These homeowners are paying high taxes to maintain a certain quality of life where they live.

I am somewhat concerned about increasing access from the north side of the freeway to the zoo and park. We already have a big problem with homeless near the zoo and the park. Living next to the zoo, in a controlled entrance development, I have still had two locked bikes stolen as have a number of others. I also really wonder who wants to come over from that side. I ride quite a lot and have not found that I needed to cross the freeway in between Olive Mill and Milpas. Besides, it is perfectly possible to go to the roundabout at Hot Springs and cross under the freeway and wind up next to the bird refuge, and close to the Zoo. Additionally, if the crossing is of the same design as the one that crosses over the highway near Pueblo st, it is too steep to ride up and given the too sharp corner, hard to turn. Since riding down puts one again at a sharp turn it is ill advised and it is difficult to control even walk down the down hill. We need safe streets for cyclists (check out the crossing at upper state over the freeway where there is suddenly no bike lane at all, just a free for all with traffic). but the one proposed here does not seem to be needed. It would eventually get filled with homeless then that overcrossing would b made unsafe and very scary to walk or jog alone. No Please DO NOT build this overcrossing. I strongly oppose it. The signal at east beach handles most if not all the biking and walking needs for the area What an unneeded intrusive wast of money..

Questions/Comments How much would it cost? I found the question "What is the nearest intersection to where you live?" to be a little confusing. Can you be more specific about the intersections you are referring to?
ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 69
I use the Cacique St. underpass to walk this way. Would the proopsed route be safer or better? I'd rather see the money used for exercise equipment in the Eastside Park If MIA Rep Alejandra Gutierrez would DO HER JOB TO KEEP UNDERPASS CLEAN, we would not need the overpass for area children to access beach, batting cages, milpas stores, etc. however given her failure to enforce laws, requiring council colleagues or mayor to respond, we need overpass. The Milpas roundabout is unsafe for bicycles. Going under 101 on Cacique street is the only other option but I feel that the Cacique/Milpas intersection is also not safe. The project proponents should consider an undercrossing that not only provides better pedestrian/bike access but also cleans up the creek along Ninos Drive. This area has a history of heavy use by the unhoused, so instead of building a bridge over a blighted and poorly maintained area, perhaps the City should address both challenges simultaneously? There needs to be more 4 way stops on the Eastside. More stop signs are a must for the safety of all the kids and adults walking We need to have more lights for twilight and night time visibility on the eastside for pedestrians and bikes‐ please plan for lights and reflectors on the bridge and on all the bike routes throughout the eastside.

Would love a pedestrian connection from La Cumbre/State/Hope area to the new/future Modoc Bike Path.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 70
Plan Requirements per Active Transportation Program (ATP) Guidelines The Active Transportation Guidelines require that an active transportation plan must include, but not be limited to, the following components or explain why the component is not applicable.

Check if included in SOW
If not, explain why not applicable.

A Mode Share: The estimated number of existing bicycle trips and pedestrian trips in the plan area, both in absolute numbers and as a percentage of all trips, and the estimated increase in the number of bicycle trips and pedestrian trips resulting from implementation of the plan.

C Pedestrian Facilities: A map and description of existing and proposed pedestrian facilities, including those at major transit hubs and those that serve public and private schools.

D Bicycle Facilities: A map and description of existing and proposed bicycle transportation facilities, including those at major transit hubs and those that serve public and private schools.

E Bicycle Parking: A map and description of existing and proposed end‐of‐trip bicycle parking facilities. Include a description of any existing and proposed policies related to bicycle parking in public locations, private parking garages and parking lots and in new commercial and residential developments. Also include a map and description of existing and proposed bicycle transport and parking facilities for connections with and use of other transportation modes. These must include, but not be limited to, bicycle parking facilities at transit stops, rail and transit terminals, ferry docks and landings, park and ride lots, and provisions for transporting bicyclists and bicycles on transit or rail vehicles or ferry vessels.

A description of bicycle parking facilities is included in the Plan; however, the facilities are not currently mapped. In 2024, the City plans to inventory all public bicycle parking facilities and develop a City‐wide mapping database for these facilities.

F Wayfinding: A description of existing and proposed signage providing wayfinding along bicycle and pedestrian networks to designated destinations.

G Non‐Infrastructure Programs: A description of existing and proposed bicycle and pedestrian education, encouragement, enforcement programs conducted in the area included within the plan. Include efforts by the law enforcement agency having primary traffic law enforcement responsibility in the area to enforce provisions of the law impacting bicycle and pedestrian safety, and the resulting effect on collisions involving bicyclists and pedestrians.

ATTACHMENT 2
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan City of Santa Barbara Public Works Department
Page | 71
H Collision Analysis: The number and location of collisions, serious injuries, and fatalities suffered by bicyclists and pedestrians in the plan area, both in absolute numbers and as a percentage of all collisions and injuries, and a goal for collision, serious injury, and fatality reduction after implementation of the plan.

I Equity Analysis: Identify census tracts that are considered to be disadvantaged or low‐ income and identify the bicycle and pedestrian needs of those disadvantaged or low‐income residents.

J Community Engagement: A description of the extent of community involvement in development of the plan, including disadvantaged and underserved communities.

K Coordination: A description of how the plan has been coordinated with neighboring jurisdictions, including school districts within the plan area, and is consistent with other local or regional transportation, air quality, or energy conservation plans, including, but not limited to, general plans and a Sustainable Community Strategy in a Regional Transportation Plan.

L Prioritization: A description of the projects and programs proposed in the plan and a listing of their priorities for implementation, including the methodology for project prioritization and a proposed timeline for implementation.

M Funding: A description of future financial needs for projects and programs that improve safety and convenience for bicyclists and pedestrians in the plan area. Include anticipated cost, revenue sources and potential grant funding for bicycle and pedestrian uses.

N Implementation: A description of steps necessary to implement the plan and the reporting process that will be used to keep the adopting agency and community informed of the progress being made in implementing the plan.

O Maintenance: A description of the policies and procedures for maintaining existing and proposed bicycle and pedestrian facilities, including, but not limited to, the maintenance of smooth pavement, ADA level surfaces, freedom from encroaching vegetation, maintenance of traffic control devices including striping and other pavement markings, and lighting.

P Resolution: A resolution showing adoption of the plan by the city, county or district. If the active transportation plan was prepared by a county transportation commission, regional transportation planning agency, MPO, school district or transit district, the plan should indicate the support via resolution of the city(s) or county(s) in which the proposed facilities would be located.

ATTACHMENT 2
&
^//>/dz^dhz
>ŽǁĞƌ
ĂƐƚƐŝĚĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚǇĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶ ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ
WƌĞƉĂƌĞĚĨŽƌ͗
ŝƚǇŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂ
ĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚŽĨWƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐ
WƌĞƉĂƌĞĚďǇ͗
^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌϮϬϮϯ
ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ dŚŝƐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇZĞƉŽƌƚŚĂƐďĞĞŶƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚƵŶĚĞƌƚŚĞĚŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚĐŝǀŝůĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌƐ͘dŚĞ ƌĞŐŝƐƚĞƌĞĚĐŝǀŝůĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌĂƚƚĞƐƚƐƚŽƚŚĞƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶĐŽŶƚĂŝŶĞĚŚĞƌĞŝŶĂŶĚƚŚĞĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐĚĂƚĂƵƉŽŶ ǁŚŝĐŚƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĐŽŶĐůƵƐŝŽŶƐ͕ĂŶĚĚĞĐŝƐŝŽŶƐĂƌĞďĂƐĞĚ͘ WƌĞƉĂƌĞĚďǇ͗
'ĂǀŝŶ<ĞĂƚŝŶŐ͕ŽŶƐŽƌWƌŽũĞĐƚ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌ
ZĞǀŝĞǁĞĚďǇ͗
'ƌĞŐzŽƵŶŐ͕ŽŶƐŽƌWƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌ
ƉƉƌŽǀĞĚďǇ͗
ŚĞůƐĞǇ^ǁĂŶƐŽŶ͕ŝƚǇŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂWƌŽũĞĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞƌ 'ƌĞŐzŽƵŶŐ
ϲϳϳϬϳ
ϬϲͬϯϬͬϮϱ
'ĂǀŝŶ<ĞĂƚŝŶŐ
ϵϭϲϰϱ
ϭϮͬϯϭͬϮϰ
ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ dĂďůĞŽĨŽŶƚĞŶƚƐ

y
hd/s
^hDDZzϰ '
E
Z>
^Z/Wd/KEϱ
^/'EZ/d
Z/ϲ dzW/>^
d/KEt/d,ϳ s
Zd/>>/'ED
Edϳ ,KZ/KEd>>/'ED
Edϴ ^dZhdhZ>>d
ZEd/s
^ϭϬ Z/',dK&tzϭϲ hd/>/d/
^ϭϳ

Es/ZKED
Ed>^dh/
^ϭϴ Z/'
Z/>/E'ϮϬ
^d,
d/Z
Yh/Z
D
Ed^Ϯϭ ^dKZDtd
ZYh>/dzϮϮ '
Kd
,E/>ͬ&KhEd/KE^Ϯϯ ^
/^D/>K/E'Ϯϱ ,zZh>/^Ϯϲ Kd,
ZWZK:
dKE^dZ/Ed^Ϯϴ WZK:
dK^d
^d/Dd
^ϯϭ KE>h^/KE^ϯϭ WW
E/y
͘ WƌŽũĞĐƚŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐDĂƉ
͘ ůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚWůĂŶĂŶĚWƌŽĨŝůĞ
͘ ƌŝĚŐĞĚǀĂŶĐĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐ^ƚƵĚŝĞƐ
͘ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽƐƚ
ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐ

͘ dŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐDĂƉƉŝŶŐ
&͘
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů^ƚƵĚŝĞƐ
'͘ ,ǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐDĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵ
,͘ WƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌǇ'ĞŽƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůZĞƉŽƌƚ
/͘ ZĞŶĚĞƌŝŶŐƐ
ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ

y
hd/s
^hDDZz
dŚĞŝƚǇŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂWƵďůŝĐtŽƌŬƐĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ;ŝƚǇͿƐĞĐƵƌĞĚĂǇĐůĞϰ͕ĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ;dWͿ ŐƌĂŶƚƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐĂŶĚĐŽƐƚĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐĨŽƌĂƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͬďŝĐǇĐůĞďƌŝĚŐĞĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŶŐƚŚĞ>ŽǁĞƌ

ĂƐƚƐŝĚĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚŽǀĞƌh^ϭϬϭƚŽƚŚĞtĂƚĞƌĨƌŽŶƚ͘h^ϭϬϭĂĐƚƐĂƐĂďĂƌƌŝĞƌĨŽƌƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͬďŝĐǇĐůĞ ƚƌĂǀĞů͕ĂŶĚĂŶŽǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐǁŽƵůĚĂůůŽǁƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƐͬďŝĐǇĐůŝƐƚƐƚŽƐĂĨĞůǇĐƌŽƐƐh^ϭϬϭĂŶĚƐĂƚŝƐĨǇƉŽůŝĐǇ ŐŽĂůƐƐĞƚĨŽƌƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŝƚǇ͛ƐWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶƐ͘dŚĞŽďũĞĐƚŝǀĞƐŽĨƚŚŝƐƐƚƵĚǇĂƌĞĂƐ ĨŽůůŽǁƐ͗ • ŶĂůǇǌĞĨĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇŽĨĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŶŐĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚŽƐƉĂŶh^ϭϬϭĂŶĚƚŚĞhŶŝŽŶWĂĐŝĨŝĐZĂŝůƌŽĂĚ;hWZZͿ ƚƌĂĐŬƐǁŝƚŚŽƵƚƉůĂĐŝŶŐŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞǁŝƚŚŝŶĂůƚƌĂŶƐŽƌhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ͖ • ^ƚƵĚǇƚŚƌĞĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐ͖ • /ĚĞŶƚŝĨǇƐŝƚĞĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ͕hWZZƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚ͕h^ϭϬϭŚŝŐŚǁĂǇ ĂŶĚ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂŽŽ;ŽŽͿƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚ͖
• ^ƚƵĚǇƚŚĞŚǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐŝŵƉĂĐƚƐŽĨĂƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͬďŝĐǇĐůĞďƌŝĚŐĞŽǀĞƌ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬǁŚŝůĞĂůƐŽ ƉƌĞƐĞŶƚŝŶŐĂŶĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƚŚĂƚŝƐĐŽŵƉĂƚŝďůĞǁŝƚŚĨƵƚƵƌĞ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂŽƵŶƚǇ&ůŽŽĚŽŶƚƌŽů ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͖
• DĂǆŝŵŝǌĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶĐǇǁŚŝůĞŵŝŶŝŵŝǌŝŶŐƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƐƐĞƐŝŶƚŚĞŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚ͖ • DŝŶŝŵŝǌĞƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇĂĐƋƵŝƐŝƚŝŽŶ͖
• ƐƐĞƐƐŚŽǁƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůďƌŝĚŐĞĂŶĚƌŽĂĚǁĂǇŽƉƚŝŽŶƐĂĨĨĞĐƚƚŚĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƚŚĞ^ƵŶƌŝƐĞZsƉĂƌŬĂŶĚ ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂ'ƌĞĞŶDŽďŝůĞ,ŽŵĞWĂƌŬĨƌŽŵWŝƚŽƐ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͖ĂŶĚ • ĞǀĞůŽƉĐŽƐƚĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐƚŚĂƚĐĂŶďĞƵƐĞĚƚŽƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƚŚĞĨŝŶĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƉŚĂƐĞƐ͘ ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂŝƐĂĐŝƚǇƚŚĂƚŚĂƐďĞĞŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƚŽŵĂǆŝŵŝǌĞƚŚĞƵƐĞŽĨƚŚĞďĞĂƵƚŝĨƵůǁĂƚĞƌĨƌŽŶƚ͕ĂŶĚƚŚŝƐ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚŚĂƐƚŚĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͬďŝĐǇĐůĞĂĐĐĞƐƐ͘dŚĞĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƐŵĂŶǇ ĐŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐďƵƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚďĞŶĞĨŝƚƐƚŽƚŚĞƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇ͘ dŚƌĞĞĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚĂŶĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶƐƚƵĚŝĞĚĂŶĚĂƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚĂƐƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚŝƐ &ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ͘dŚĞĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐĨŽĐƵƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘ dŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐĨŽĐƵƐĞĚŽŶĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚďƌŝĚŐĞƚǇƉĞƐĂŶĚƐƉĂŶĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶƐƚŽĐƌŽƐƐh^ϭϬϭĂŶĚ ƚŚĞƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚ͘dŚĞƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚĚŽĞƐŶŽƚƉĞƌŵŝƚĨĂůƐĞǁŽƌŬƚŽďĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚĂďŽǀĞĂŶĂĐƚŝǀĞƚƌĂĐŬ͕ƐŽƉƌĞĐĂƐƚ ĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞĂŶĚƐƚĞĞůƚƌƵƐƐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚǇƉĞƐǁĞƌĞĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶĐǇĂŶĚƉƌŽƉĞƌ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĂďŝůŝƚǇǁŚŝůĞǁŽƌŬŝŶŐŽǀĞƌƚŚĞƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚ͘
dŚĞƐŽƵƚŚƐŝĚĞĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚǁĂƐĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂƚƚŚĞŽŽǁŚŝůĞŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶŝŶŐ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶĐǇ͘DƵůƚŝƉůĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐǁĞƌĞƌĞǀŝĞǁĞĚďƵƚĚƵĞƚŽĨĂůƐĞǁŽƌŬƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐǁŝƚŚĂƐƚͲŝŶͲ ƉůĂĐĞĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ͕ŝƚǁĂƐĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚƚŚĂƚƉƌĞĐĂƐƚŐŝƌĚĞƌƐǁŽƵůĚďĞĞĨĨĞĐƚŝǀĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐƚŽĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚƚŚŝƐ ĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚ͘
dŚĞŶŽƌƚŚƐŝĚĞĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚŝƐĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶĞĚĂƚƚŚĞĐƵůͲĚĞͲƐĂĐŽŶĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚ͘ƵĞƚŽƚŚĞŶĞĞĚĨŽƌĐƵƌǀĞĚ ŐĞŽŵĞƚƌǇ͕ĂĐĂƐƚŝŶƉůĂĐĞƐůĂďƐƚĂĐŬĞĚƌĂŵƉĐŽŶĐĞƉƚǁĂƐŶŽƚĞĚƚŽďĞƚŚĞďĞƐƚĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞĂƚƚŚŝƐůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘/ƚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂůĞƐƐĐŽŶƐƚƌŝĐƚŝŶŐůĂǇŽƵƚ͕ĂƐĐŽŵƉĂƌĞĚƚŽĂƚǇƉŝĐĂůĐŽƌŬƐĐƌĞǁĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚĨŝƚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ ŶĂƌƌŽǁƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐĂƚƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘ dŚĞƉƵƌƉŽƐĞŽĨƚŚĞ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇŝƐƚŽŝĚĞŶƚŝĨǇĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƐƚƵĚǇĂƌĞĂĂŶĚƉƌŽƉŽƐĞ ǀŝĂďůĞďƌŝĚŐĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚǇƉĞƐĨŽƌƚŚĞĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ͘ŽƐƚĨŽƌƚŚĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶŐĞŶĞƌĂƚĞĚƚŽĂƐƐŝƐƚƚŚĞ ĐŝƚǇŝŶƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŵŝŶŐƚŚĞĨŝŶĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƉŚĂƐĞƐ͘ ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
'
E
Z>
^Z/Wd/KE
dŚĞƉƵƌƉŽƐĞŽĨƚŚĞdWŝƐƚŽĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞĂĐƚŝǀĞŵŽĚĞƐŽĨƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐďŝŬŝŶŐĂŶĚǁĂůŬŝŶŐ͕ǁŚŝůĞ ŝŶĐƌĞĂƐŝŶŐƐĂĨĞƚǇ͘/ƚĂŝŵƐƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĂƚƚŚĞďĞŶĞĨŝƚƐŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽŐƌĂŵĂƌĞĚŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚĞĚƚŽĚŝƐĂĚǀĂŶƚĂŐĞĚ ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͕ǁŚŝůĞƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐĂďƌŽĂĚƐƉĞĐƚƌƵŵŽĨƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚŽďĞŶĞĨŝƚĂĐƚŝǀĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƵƐĞƌƐ͘ dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͬďŝĐǇĐůĞďƌŝĚŐĞǁŽƵůĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŵƵůƚŝŵŽĚĂůĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƚŚĞǌŽŽ͕ƉĂƌŬƐĂŶĚ tĂƚĞƌĨƌŽŶƚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞ>ŽǁĞƌ
ĂƐƚƐŝĚĞŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƚŚĂƚŝƐĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇŝŵƉĂĐƚĞĚďǇh^ϭϬϭ͕ǁŚŝĐŚĂĐƚƐĂƐĂ ďĂƌƌŝĞƌ͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚďƌŝĚŐĞǁŽƵůĚƐƉĂŶŽǀĞƌƚŚĞŚŝŐŚǁĂǇ͕ĂŶĚĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚ͕ƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂĨĞ ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͬďŝĐǇĐůĞĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ͘dŚŝƐǁŽƵůĚƐĞƌǀĞƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚŝŶĂĐĐĞƐƐ͕ǁŝƚŚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚĞĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƉŽŝŶƚƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϭ͘ϮϱŵŝůĞƐĂǁĂǇ͘ dŚƌĞĞŚŽƌŝǌŽŶƚĂůĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐǁĞƌĞƐƚƵĚŝĞĚǁŚŝĐŚĨŽĐƵƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞŵŽƐƚĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ ĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚƌĞĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐǁĞƌĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐƐƚƵĚǇ͕ĂůůĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚ ŚŽƌŝǌŽŶƚĂůĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚ͘dŚŝƐĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚĐŽŶŶĞĐƚƐĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚŽŶƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚƐŝĚĞŽĨh^ϭϬϭƚŽǁŝŐŚƚ DƵƌƉŚǇ&ŝĞůĚŽŶƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚƐŝĚĞŽĨh^ϭϬϭ͘
DŝŶŝŵŝǌŝŶŐŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂƚƚŚĞ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂŽŽ͕ĞŶĐƌŽĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐŝŶƚŽhŶŝŽŶWĂĐŝĨŝĐƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ͕ ĞŶĐƌŽĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐŝŶƚŽĂůƚƌĂŶƐƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇĂŶĚĐŽŵƉĂƚŝďŝůŝƚǇǁŝƚŚĨƵƚƵƌĞĨůŽŽĚĐŽŶƚƌŽůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƉůĂŶŶĞĚĨŽƌ ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬǁĞƌĞƐŽŵĞŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŝŵĂƌǇƐƚƵĚǇĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘ ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ

^/'EZ/d
Z/
dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂǁŝůůďĞƵƐĞĚĨŽƌĨŝŶĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚĂƌĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͗ • ŝŬĞWĂƚŚĞƐŝŐŶʹŝŬĞWĂƚŚĚĞƐŝŐŶǁŝůůďĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶĂůƚƌĂŶƐ͞dŚĞϳƚŚ ĚŝƚŝŽŶ,ŝŐŚǁĂǇĞƐŝŐŶ
DĂŶƵĂů;,DͿ͟;ŚĂƉƚĞƌϭϬϬϬ͗ŝĐǇĐůĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶĞƐŝŐŶͿ • ƌŝĚŐĞĞƐŝŐŶͲ&ŝŶĂůďƌŝĚŐĞĚĞƐŝŐŶǁŝůůďĞƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚŝŶĂĐĐŽƌĚĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚ͞^,dK>Z&ƌŝĚŐĞ ĞƐŝŐŶ^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ;ϴƚŚ
ĚŝƚŝŽŶͿ͕͞^,dK>Z&'ƵŝĚĞ^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌƚŚĞĞƐŝŐŶŽĨ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƌŝĚŐĞƐ;ϮŶĚ
ĚŝƚŝŽŶͿ͕͟ĂŶĚƚŚĞĂůƚƌĂŶƐŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƐ;^,dKͲ^ͲϴͿ͘͟dŚĞůĂƚĞƐƚ ƵƉĚĂƚĞĚǀĞƌƐŝŽŶƐŽĨĂůƚƌĂŶƐďƌŝĚŐĞĚĞƐŝŐŶŵĂŶƵĂůƐǁŝůůĂůƐŽďĞƵƚŝůŝǌĞĚǁŚĞŶĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞ͘ • ^ĞŝƐŵŝĐĞƐŝŐŶͲ^ĞŝƐŵŝĐĚĞƐŝŐŶǁŝůůďĞƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚŝŶĂĐĐŽƌĚĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĂůƚƌĂŶƐ͞^ĞŝƐŵŝĐĞƐŝŐŶ ƌŝƚĞƌŝĂsĞƌƐŝŽŶϮ͘ϬƉƌŝůϮϬϭϵ͟ĂŶĚƚŚĞůĂƚĞƐƚŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞĨƌŽŵĂůƚƌĂŶƐ ĂƌƚŚƋƵĂŬĞ
ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ͘
• ,ǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐ&ƌĞĞďŽĂƌĚͲdŚĞĂůƚƌĂŶƐ͞>ŽĐĂůWƌŽŐƌĂŵDĂŶƵĂů͟ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐƚŚĞďƌŝĚŐĞƐŽĨĨŝƚƚŽďĞĂ ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨϮ͛ĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞϱϬͲǇĞĂƌĨůŽŽĚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ͕ŽƌƚŚĞĨůŽŽĚŽĨƌĞĐŽƌĚ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞďƌŝĚŐĞŝƐ ĐĂƉĂďůĞŽĨĐŽŶǀĞǇŝŶŐƚŚĞϭϬϬͲǇĞĂƌĨůŽŽĚ;ŝ͘Ğ͕͘ŶŽĨƌĞĞďŽĂƌĚͿ͘ĚĞƐŝŐŶĞǆĐĞƉƚŝŽŶŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŽ ďĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĨŽƌĨƌĞĞďŽĂƌĚĂƐƚŚŝƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶĂĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶĂŶĚŝƚŝƐŶŽƚĨĞĂƐŝďůĞƚŽƌĂŝƐĞ ƚŚĞƉƌŽĨŝůĞĂŶǇŚŝŐŚĞƌĚƵĞƚŽŐƌĂĚĞĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐ͘
ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
dzW/>^
d/KEt/d,
dŚĞĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂƚŚĂƚŐŽǀĞƌŶůĂƐƐ/ŝŬĞǁĂǇǁŝĚƚŚĐŽŵĞƐĨƌŽŵ ƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϭϬϬϯ͘ϭŽĨƚŚĞĂůƚƌĂŶƐ,ŝŐŚǁĂǇĚĞƐŝŐŶŵĂŶƵĂů͘ůĂƐƐ /ĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐŵƵƐƚďĞĂƚůĞĂƐƚϴĨĞĞƚǁŝĚĞ͕ďƵƚƚŚĞĐƌŝƚĞƌŝŽŶ ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞƐĂƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚǁŝĚƚŚŽĨϭϬĨĞĞƚ͘ŝŬĞǁĂǇƐŚŽƵůĚĞƌƐ ŵƵƐƚďĞĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨϮĨĞĞƚŽŶĞĂĐŚƐŝĚĞĐŽŵƉŽƐĞĚŽĨƚŚĞ ƐĂŵĞƉĂǀĞŵĞŶƚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůĂƐƚŚĞďŝŬĞƉĂƚŚ;ϯĨĞĞƚƐŚŽƵůĚĞƌƐ ĂƌĞƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚǁŚĞƌĞĨĞĂƐŝďůĞͿ͘dŚĞĐůĞĂƌǁŝĚƚŚŽĨĂďŝŬĞƉĂƚŚ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐŝƐϭϬĨĞĞƚďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞƌĂŝůŝŶŐ͘/ƚŝƐĚĞƐŝƌĂďůĞ ƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĐůĞĂƌǁŝĚƚŚŽĨƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐďĞĞƋƵĂůƚŽƚŚĞ ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵĐůĞĂƌǁŝĚƚŚŽĨƚŚĞƉĂƚŚƉůƵƐƐŚŽƵůĚĞƌƐ͘
ĐůĞĂƌǁŝĚƚŚŽĨϭϮĨĞĞƚ;ϴĨĞĞƚƉůƵƐϮĨĞĞƚƐŚŽƵůĚĞƌƐŽŶĞĂĐŚ ƐŝĚĞͿŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ͘dŚŝƐƐĂƚŝƐĨŝĞƐƚŚĞŵŝŶŝŵƵŵƉĂƚŚĂŶĚ ƐŚŽƵůĚĞƌǁŝĚƚŚŽĨĨƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂŶĚĞǆĐĞĞĚƐƚŚĞϭϬĨĞĞƚ ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵďĞƚǁĞĞŶƌĂŝůƐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐ͘ŶĂƌƌŽǁĞƌϭϬĨĞĞƚǁŝĚƚŚǁĂƐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚďƵƚƌĞũĞĐƚĞĚĚƵĞƚŽƚŚĞ ĚĞƐŝƌĞƚŽŚĂǀĞƐŽŵĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů͞ƐŚǇ͟ĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞƉĂƚŚĂŶĚďƌŝĚŐĞƌĂŝůŝŶŐ͘tŝĚĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐǁĞĂůƐŽ ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚďƵƚŝŶĚŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶƐǁŝƚŚŝƚǇƉĂƌŬƐ͕ǁŝĚĞƌǁŝĚƚŚƐĐĂŶƐŽŵĞƚŝŵĞƐůĞĂĚƚŽŵŝƐƵƐĞŽĨƚŚĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚǇ͘ ǁŝĚĞƌĨĂĐŝůŝƚǇǁŽƵůĚĂůƐŽŚĂǀĞŚŝŐŚĞƌƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĂŶĚŚĂǀĞĂŚŝŐŚĞƌĐŽƐƚ͘ϭĨĞĞƚǁŝĚĞƌĂŝůŝŶŐƐĂƌĞ ƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŽŶĞĂĐŚƐŝĚĞƐŽƚŚĞƚŽƚĂůƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚďƌŝĚŐĞǁŝĚƚŚŝƐϭϰĨĞĞƚ͘ s
Zd/>>/'ED
Ed
dŚĞǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůƉƌŽĨŝůĞŝƐĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶĞĚďǇƚŚĞŵĞƌŝĐĂŶƐǁŝƚŚŝƐĂďŝůŝƚŝĞƐĐƚ;ͿŐƌĂĚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͕ǀĞƌƚŝĐĂů ĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƉĞƌƚŚĞhŶŝŽŶWĂĐŝĨŝĐZĂŝůƌŽĂĚ;hWZZͿŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐĨŽƌƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚŐƌĂĚĞƐĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƚŚĞ ĂůƚƌĂŶƐ,ŝŐŚǁĂǇĞƐŝŐŶDĂŶƵĂů͕ĂŶĚǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůŚǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐŽǀĞƌ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ͘ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐůŝŵŝƚĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚĞƐƚŽĂŵĂǆŝŵƵŵƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĞĚŐƌĂĚĞŽĨϱйŽƌůĞƐƐ͘^ƚĞĞƉĞƌŐƌĂĚĞƐŽĨƵƉƚŽ ϴ͘ϯϯйĂƌĞĂůƐŽĂůůŽǁĞĚ͕ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌĂĨůĂƚƌĞƐƚůĂŶĚŝŶŐŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĞǀĞƌǇϯϬĨƚǁŚĞŶŐƌĂĚĞƐĞǆĐĞĞĚϱй͘dŚĞƐĞ ƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞůǇůŽǁŐƌĂĚŝĞŶƚƐƚƌĂŶƐůĂƚĞŝŶƚŽƚŚĞŶĞĞĚĨŽƌĂůŽŶŐĞƌŚŽƌŝǌŽŶƚĂůĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƚŚĞŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇ ǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞƐŽǀĞƌǀĂƌŝŽƵƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͘dŚĞŵŝŶŝŵƵŵǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƉĞƌhWZZ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐŝƐϮϯ͛Ͳϰ͘͟dŚŝƐůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶĐŽŶƚƌŽůůĞĚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƉƌŽĨŝůĞŚŝŐŚƉŽŝŶƚ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞhWZZ ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͕ƚŚĞďƌŝĚŐĞƐŽĨĨŝƚŵƵƐƚĂůƐŽďĞĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞĂůƚƌĂŶƐƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐŽĨ ϭϴ͛Ͳϲ͕͟ĂŶĚƚŚĞ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬŚŝŐŚǁĂƚĞƌĨůŽǁƐ͘
ĂĐŚǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůƉƌŽĨŝůĞǁĂƐĂŶĂůǇǌĞĚƚŽƐƵĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚůǇƉĂƐƐƚŚĞ ĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐůŝƐƚĞĚ͘^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌǁĂǇƐƚŽŵŝŶŝŵŝǌĞƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĚĞƉƚŚƚŽŚĞůƉŵŝƚŝŐĂƚĞ ƚŚĞŶĞĞĚĨŽƌŚŝŐŚĞƌƉƌŽĨŝůĞƐǁŝƚŚůŽŶŐĞƌŚŽƌŝǌŽŶƚĂůĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚĞƐ͘ ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
,KZ/KEd>>/'ED
Ed
ŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚĐŽƐƚ͕ƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ͕ǀŝƐƵĂůŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͕ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐ͕ ƐŚŽƌƚͲĂŶĚůŽŶŐͲƚĞƌŵůŽƐƐŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ͕ĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƚŽĐŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚͬŽƌƚŚĞŽŽŬŝŽƐŬ ůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞĐƌĞĞŬ͕ƐĞĐƵƌŝƚǇĨŽƌƚŚĞŽŽ͕ŶĞĐĞƐƐŝƚǇĨŽƌŝŵƉƌŽǀŝŶŐƚŚĞ ĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǌŽŽĂĐĐĞƐƐďƌŝĚŐĞ͕ĂŶĚĐƌĞĂƚŝŶŐůŽŶŐĞƌĂŶĚƉŽƐƐŝďůǇůĞƐƐƵƐĞƌͲĨƌŝĞŶĚůǇƌŽƵƚĞƐĨŽƌƉĞĚƐͬĐǇĐůŝƐƚƐ͘ ^ŝŶĐĞƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶƉƌŽũĞĐƚĐŽŶĨŽƌŵĂƚĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚĂŶĚh^ϭϬϭĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐǁĞƌĞŚŝŐŚůǇĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶĞĚ ďǇĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇůŝŵŝƚƐ͕ƚŚĞŚŽƌŝǌŽŶƚĂůĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐǁĞƌĞĨŽĐƵƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽƐĞůĞĐƚƚŚĞŵŽƐƚĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽƚŚĞƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚ ĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚĨŽƌƚŚĞ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬĨƌĂŵĞ͕ƚǁŽĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚƐǁĞƌĞƐƚƵĚŝĞĚƚŚĂƚǁŽƵůĚŶŽƚĐƌĞĂƚĞĂ ŶĞǁĐƌĞĞŬĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐĂŶĚǁŽƵůĚƵƐĞƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐďƌŝĚŐĞĂƚƚŚĞ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂŽŽĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞƚŚĂƚǁŽƵůĚďĞ ǁŝĚĞŶĞĚ͘
^ŝŶĐĞƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŽƵůĚďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚĞĚŽĂƐƚĂůŽŶĞĂŶĚĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ͕ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚƐǁĞƌĞƐƚƵĚŝĞĚĨŽƌĐŽŶĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŝƚǇ͛ƐŽĂƐƚĂů>ĂŶĚhƐĞWůĂŶ;>hWͿ͘ŝŽůŽŐŝĐĂů ZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ>hWƚŚĂƚĐŽƵůĚďĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐ͗ • ϰ͘ϭͲϲůůŽǁĞĚhƐĞƐŝŶdĞƌƌĞƐƚƌŝĂů
^,Ɛ
• ϰ͘ϭͲϭϭƌĞĞŬƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƐ
• ϰ͘ϭͲϭϱ
^,͕tĞƚůĂŶĚ͕ĂŶĚƌĞĞŬ,ĂďŝƚĂƚƵĨĨĞƌƐ
• ϰ͘ϭͲϭϳĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŝŶ,ĂďŝƚĂƚƵĨĨĞƌƐ
• ϰ͘ϭͲϭϴZĞĚƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨ
^,͕tĞƚůĂŶĚ͕ĂŶĚƌĞĞŬ,ĂďŝƚĂƚƵĨĨĞƌƐ
dŚĞƐĞƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐŐĞŶĞƌĂůůǇůŝŵŝƚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŝŶϱϬ͛ŽĨƚŚĞƚŽƉŽĨďĂŶŬŽĨ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬĂŶĚůŝŵŝƚŶĞǁ ĐƌĞĞŬĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƐƵŶůĞƐƐƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞŶŽŽƚŚĞƌĨĞĂƐŝďůĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐĂŶĚͬŽƌĐĞƌƚĂŝŶĨŝŶĚŝŶŐƐĐĂŶďĞŵĂĚĞ͘ dŚĞdĞĂŵůŽŽŬĞĚŝŶƚŽƚŚĞĨĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇŽĨƚŚƌĞĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐ͗ • ůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚϭʹEĞǁďƌŝĚŐĞĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƉĂƌĂůůĞůƚŽhŶŝŽŶWĂĐŝĨŝĐZŝŐŚƚŽĨtĂǇ;ƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚͿ • ůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚϮʹhƐĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐďƌŝĚŐĞĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐĂƚŽŽ
ŶƚƌĂŶĐĞ;ŽƵƚƐŝĚĞϱϬ͛ĐƌĞĞŬďƵĨĨĞƌͿ
• ůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚϯʹhƐĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐďƌŝĚŐĞĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐĂƚŽŽ
ŶƚƌĂŶĐĞ;ǁŝƚŚŝŶϱϬ͛ĐƌĞĞŬďƵĨĨĞƌͿ
ůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚϭ;WƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚͿʹdŚŝƐĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚƌƵŶƐƉĂƌĂůůĞůƚŽƚŚĞhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞĚŐĞŽĨƚŚĞ ŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚ͘dŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƚĞĂŵĞůĞĐƚĞĚƚŽƉůĂĐĞƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞĚŐĞŽĨĚĞĐŬϭ͛ͲϬ͟ƐŽƵƚŚŽĨƚŚĞhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨ ǁĂǇůŝŶĞĨŽƌĂĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƚŽůĞƌĂŶĐĞďƵĨĨĞƌ͘tŚŝůĞƚŚŝƐĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚĚŽĞƐƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶƚŚĞŶĞĞĚĨŽƌĂŶĞǁϭϰĨĞĞƚ ǁŝĚĞďƌŝĚŐĞĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ͕ƚŚĞŽƚŚĞƌĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐǁŽƵůĚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞǁŝĚĞŶŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞ ĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǌŽŽĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞďƌŝĚŐĞĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐǁŚŝĐŚƌĞƐƵůƚƐŝŶƐŝŵŝůĂƌƌĞĞŬŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͘WƌŝŵĂƌǇĂĚǀĂŶƚĂŐĞƐŽĨƚŚŝƐ ĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞĂƌĞƚŚĞďĞŶĞĨŝƚƐƚŽďŽƚŚƚŚĞŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚĂĐƚŝǀĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶƵƐĞƌƐ͘dŚŝƐ ĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚŬĞĞƉƐƵƐĞƌƐƐĞƉĂƌĂƚĞĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŽŽƉĂƌĐĞůĂŶĚƚŝĞƐŝŶĂƚƚŚĞŝĚĞĂůůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨǁŝŐŚƚDƵƌƉŚǇ &ŝĞůĚ͘
dŚŝƐĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞĂůƐŽƌĞƐƵůƚƐŝŶƚŚĞĨĞǁĞƐƚůŽƐƐŽĨƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƉůĂĐĞƐƚŽƚŚĞŽŽWĂƌĐĞů;ϱƚŽƚĂůͿĂŶĚŵĂǆŝŵŝǌĞƐ ŽŽƐĞĐƵƌŝƚǇƐŝŶĐĞƚŚĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƉĂƚŚǁŽƵůĚŚĂǀĞŶŽĚŝƌĞĐƚĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽƚŚĞŽŽƉĂƌĐĞů͘^ŝŶĐĞƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚ hWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇůŝŶĞŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚŶĞĂƌƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞĚŐĞŽĨƚŚĞŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚƉĂǀĞŵĞŶƚ͕ƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞǁŝůů ŶĞĞĚƚŽďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƉĂĐĞƐ͘^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐǁĞƌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ĞŶŽƵŐŚǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞďĞůŽǁƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚŽƐƚŝůůĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ͘dŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐ ĂůƐŽůŽŽŬĞĚĂƚĐŽůƵŵŶƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚƐƉĂŶůĞŶŐƚŚƐƚŽƌĞƚĂŝŶĂƐŵĂŶǇƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƉĂĐĞƐďĞůŽǁƚŚĞŶĞǁ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂƐƉŽƐƐŝďůĞ͘
ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ

ůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚϮʹdŚŝƐůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚǁĂƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŽƵƚƐŝĚĞƚŚĞϱϬ͛ƌĞĞŬďƵĨĨĞƌĂŶĚǁŽƵůĚďĞĞǆƉĞĐƚĞĚƚŽƐĂƚŝƐĨǇ >hWƉŽůŝĐŝĞƐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ͘dŚŝƐĐŽŵĞƐĂƚŐƌĞĂƚĐŽƐƚƐďŽƚŚŝŶƚĞƌŵƐŽĨĚŽůůĂƌƐĂŶĚ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽƚŚĞŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚ͘dŚŝƐĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐďŝƐĞĐƚŝŶŐƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚǁŝƚŚĂŶĞůĞǀĂƚĞĚ ƌĞƚĂŝŶŝŶŐǁĂůůĂŶĚďƌŝĚŐĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘^ŝŶĐĞƚŚĞĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚŵƵƐƚĐŽŶĨŽƌŵƚŽƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŐƌĂĚĞďǇƚŚĞŽŽ ĞŶƚƌĂŶĐĞŝƚǁŽƵůĚƉƌĞǀĞŶƚǀĞŚŝĐůĞƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĨůŽǁŝŶƚŚĞĨŝƌƐƚƚǁŽƐŽƵƚŚĞƌŶƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂŝƐůĞƐ͘>ŝŵŝƚĞĚǀĞƌƚŝĐĂů ĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞĐŽƵůĚďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞƚǁŽŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶĂŝƐůĞƐƚŽŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĐŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶ͕ďƵƚŝƚǁŽƵůĚŶŽƚďĞ ĨĞĂƐŝďůĞƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƚƌƵĐŬĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞ͘ZĞĚƵĐĞĚǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞŝƐĂƌĞƐƵůƚŽĨƚŚĞĨĂĐƚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞ ƉƌŽĨŝůĞĐĂŶŽŶůǇĐůŝŵďĂƚĂŵĂǆŝŵƵŵŐƌĂĚĞŽĨϴ͘ϯϯйƚŽƐĂƚŝƐĨǇƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘DĂŶǇŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ ƐƉĂĐĞƐǁŽƵůĚďĞĂĨĨĞĐƚĞĚĂƐƚŚĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚĂŶŐůĞĚŽŶĞͲǁĂǇƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂŝƐůĞƐǁŽƵůĚŶĞĞĚƚŽďĞĐŽŶǀĞƌƚĞĚƚŽ ƚǁŽͲǁĂǇǁŚŝĐŚǁŽƵůĚĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞƚŚĞĞŶƚŝƌĞƐŽƵƚŚĞƌŶŵŽƐƚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƌŽǁĐŽŶƐŝƐƚŝŶŐŽĨϭϭƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƉĂĐĞƐ͘Ŷ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůϲƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƉĂĐĞƐǁŽƵůĚĂůƐŽďĞůŽƐƚŝŶƚŚĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƌŽǁƐďĂƐĞĚŽŶĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚ ŝƚƐĞůĨ͘dŚŝƐĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚǁŽƵůĚĂůƐŽƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƚŚĞƌĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞŽŽŬŝŽƐŬĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐ;ǁĂůůƐ͕ ƚƌĞůůŝƐͿ͘KƵƌdĞĂŵĨĞĞůƐƚŚŝƐĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚŝƐŶŽƚĨĞĂƐŝďůĞĚƵĞƚŽŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĐŽƐƚƐ͕ƵŶƌĞĂƐŽŶĂďůĞ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚĐŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůŝƚǇ͘dŚŝƐĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞǁŽƵůĚĂůƐŽƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵŽĚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĂŶĚƉŽƐƐŝďůĞǁŝĚĞŶŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŽŽďƌŝĚŐĞǁŚŝĐŚĨƵƌƚŚĞƌŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĂŶĚĐŽƐƚ͘ ůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚϯʹdŚŝƐůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚǁĂƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞϱϬ͛ƌĞĞŬďƵĨĨĞƌĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞǁĞƐƚĞƌŶĞĚŐĞŽĨƚŚĞŽŽ ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚ͘dŚŝƐĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚǁĂƐƐƚƵĚŝĞĚďĞĐĂƵƐĞĂůƚŚŽƵŐŚŝƚŝƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞϱϬ͛ďƵĨĨĞƌ͕ƚŚĞĂƌĞĂŽĨƚŚĞ ĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚŚĂƐĂůƌĞĂĚǇďĞĞŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚǁŝƚŚĂƐƉŚĂůƚĨŽƌƵƐĞŽĨƚŚĞŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚĂŶĚǁŽƵůĚĂůƐŽŶŽƚ ĐƌĞĂƚĞĂŶĞǁĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐŽǀĞƌ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚĚŽĞƐŶŽƚƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚŶĞǁ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŝŶĂŶĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƵŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚĂƌĞĂ͘dŚĞĂĚǀĂŶƚĂŐĞŽĨƚŚŝƐĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚŝƐƚŚĂƚŝƚǁŽƵůĚƌĞĚƵĐĞ ƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚĐŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĂŶĚǁŽƵůĚĂůƐŽďĞůĞƐƐĞǆƉĞŶƐŝǀĞƚŚĂŶůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞϮĚƵĞƚŽĂƐŚŽƌƚĞƌďƌŝĚŐĞ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘ŝƐĂĚǀĂŶƚĂŐĞƐŽĨƚŚŝƐĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞŝƐƚŚĂƚŝƚǁŽƵůĚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵŽĚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚƉŽƐƐŝďůĞǁŝĚĞŶŝŶŐŽĨ ƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŽŽďƌŝĚŐĞĂƐƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚďŝĐǇĐůĞĂĐĐĞƐƐŽŶƚŚĞŽŽďƌŝĚŐĞĚŽĞƐŶŽƚŵĞĞƚ ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͘/ƚĂůƐŽƌĞƐƵůƚƐŝŶƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽƚŚĞŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂŶĚŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞƚŽƚŚĞ ƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚ͕ƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶŐŝŶĂƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚůŽƐƐŽĨϮϰƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƉĂĐĞƐǀĞƌƐƵƐϱƐƉĂĐĞƐ͘ŽŽƐĞĐƵƌŝƚǇ ǁŽƵůĚŶĞĞĚƚŽďĞŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƵƐĞŽĨĂƚŐƌĂĚĞĨĞŶĐŝŶŐǁŚŝĐŚǁŝůůĚŝŵŝŶŝƐŚƚŚĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ ĞǆƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞ͘&ƵƌƚŚĞƌ͕ďĞĐĂƵƐĞƚŚĞŽŽŐĂƚĞƐƚŚĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚĂĨƚĞƌŚŽƵƌƐ͕ƚŚĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚĞǆŝƚǁŽƵůĚŶĞĞĚƚŽ ďĞƌĞĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĞĚƚŽĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞƚŚĞŶĞǁƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶƉĂƚŚ͘ h^ϭϬϭƌŽƐƐŝŶŐͲ/ŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞƚŚĞďƌŝĚŐĞůĞŶŐƚŚ;ĂŶĚƚŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞĐŽƐƚͿĂĐƌŽƐƐh^ϭϬϭ͕ƚŚĞĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚ ǁĂƐƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚƚŽďĞƉĞƌƉĞŶĚŝĐƵůĂƌƚŽƚŚĞƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶŐŝŶƚŚĞƐŚŽƌƚĞƐƚƉĂƚŚƉŽƐƐŝďůĞ͘/ƚǁĂƐďĞƐƚĨŽƌ ƚŚĞĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚƚŽĐƌŽƐƐh^ϭϬϭŽŶƚŚĞĨĂƌĞĂƐƚƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞŝƚǇŽǁŶĞĚŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶƉĂƌĐĞů͘ƌŽƐƐŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞĞĂƐƚ ƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞƉĂƌĐĞůǁĂƐŵŽƐƚĨĞĂƐŝďůĞďĞĐĂƵƐĞŝƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůŚŽƌŝǌŽŶƚĂůĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞĨƌŽŵƚŚĞǁŝŐŚƚ DƵƌƉŚǇ&ŝĞůĚĐŽŶĨŽƌŵƚŽĞůĞǀĂƚĞƚŚĞƉƌŽĨŝůĞŽǀĞƌƚŚĞhWZZƚƌĂĐŬƐĂŶĚƐƚŝůůƐĂƚŝƐĨǇƚŚĞŵĂǆŝŵƵŵŐƌĂĚĞ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘
EŽƌƚŚƉƉƌŽĂĐŚͲKŶƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ƚŚĞƐĂŵĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐĂƉƉůŝĞĚ͘dŚŝƐůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶǁĂƐ ŵŽƌĞĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶĞĚĂƚƚŚĞĞŶĚŽĨƚŚĞĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚĐƵůͲĚĞͲƐĂĐ͕ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽĂƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚ͘ ƐƚĂĐŬĞĚƌĂŵƉƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞǁĂƐŵŽƐƚĨĞĂƐŝďůĞƚŽƚŽƵĐŚĚŽǁŶƚŽƚŚĞŽƌŝŐŝŶĂůŐƌĂĚĞǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ ĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐ͘
ĞƚĂŝůĞĚŚŽƌŝǌŽŶƚĂůĂŶĚǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚƐĂƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶƉƉĞŶĚŝǆ͘ ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
^dZhdhZ>>d
ZEd/s
^
dŚĞďƌŝĚŐĞǁŝůůŚĂǀĞƚŚƌĞĞĚŝƐƚŝŶĐƚĨƌĂŵĞƐ͘dŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚǁŝůůďĞĐĂůůĞĚƚŚĞ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬĨƌĂŵĞ ĂŶĚǁŝůůĞǆƚĞŶĚĨƌŽŵǁŝŐŚƚDƵƌƉŚǇ&ŝĞůĚǁĞƐƚŽĨ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬƚŽƚŚĞϵϬĚĞŐƌĞĞďĞŶĚƚŽĐƌŽƐƐhWZZ ŽǀĞƌƚŚĞŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚ͘dŚĞƐĞĐŽŶĚĨƌĂŵĞǁŝůůďĞƚŚĞh^ϭϬϭĨƌĂŵĞǁŚŝĐŚǁŝůůƐƉĂŶĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚƐŝĚĞ ŽĨƚŚĞhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇƚŽƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞĂůƚƌĂŶƐh^ϭϬϭƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ͘dŚĞƚŚŝƌĚĨƌĂŵĞǁŝůůďĞƚŚĞ ŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶƐƚĂĐŬĞĚƌĂŵƉƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘ŶĞǆƉĂŶƐŝŽŶũŽŝŶƚǁŝůůďĞŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇďĞƚǁĞĞŶĞĂĐŚĨƌĂŵĞ͘ůůŐŝƌĚĞƌƐ ǁŝƚŚŝŶĞĂĐŚĨƌĂŵĞŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶĂƐƐƵŵĞĚƚŽďĞƐŝŵƉůĞƐƉĂŶĨŽƌĚĞĂĚůŽĂĚƐĂŶĚĐŽŶƚŝŶƵŽƵƐĨŽƌůŝǀĞůŽĂĚƐ͘/Ŷ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶĐǇĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚĐŽŶƚŝŶƵŽƵƐůŝǀĞůŽĂĚƐ͕ƌĞĚƵĐŝŶŐƚŚĞŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨ ďƌŝĚŐĞũŽŝŶƚƐŝƐĚĞƐŝƌĂďůĞĨŽƌƌĞĚƵĐĞũŽŝŶƚƐĞĂůŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞ͕ĂŶĚůĞƐƐƚƌŝƉƉŝŶŐŚĂǌĂƌĚƐĚƵĞƚŽĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚŝŶŐ ĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶƚĞǆƉĂŶƐŝŽŶũŽŝŶƚĐŽǀĞƌƉůĂƚĞƐ͘
^ŝŶĐĞƚŚĞŐĞŽŵĞƚƌǇĂŶĚƐƉĂŶĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨďŽƚŚƚŚĞ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬĂŶĚ^ƚĂĐŬĞĚZĂŵƉĨƌĂŵĞƐĂƌĞ ŚŝŐŚůǇĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶĞĚ;ǁŚŝĐŚůŝŵŝƚĨĞĂƐŝďůĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐͿ͕ƚŚĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐŝŶƚŚŝƐƐƚƵĚǇǁŝůůĨŽĐƵƐŽŶƚŚĞ h^ϭϬϭĨƌĂŵĞ͘dŚĞŵĂŝŶƐƉĂŶ͕ĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐŽǀĞƌh^ϭϬϭĂŶĚƚŚĞƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚ͕ǁĂƐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚƚŽŚĂǀĞϯĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ ƐƉĂŶĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ͗ĂƐŝŶŐůĞĐůĞĂƌƐƉĂŶ͕ĂϮͲƐƉĂŶ͕ĂŶĚĂϯͲƐƉĂŶĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶ͘ ĂĐŚŽĨƚŚĞƐĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐ
ƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶŵŝŶŽƌĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƚŽƚŚĞǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚ͘ŚĂŶŐĞƐŝŶǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚďĞƚǁĞĞŶĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐĂƌĞ ĚƵĞƚŽĐŚĂŶŐĞƐŝŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĚĞƉƚŚĂŶĚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐǁŚĞƌĞǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůŐƌĂĚĞďƌĞĂŬƐĐĂŶďĞŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĚ͘ ĞƚĂŝůĞĚďƌŝĚŐĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂĚǀĂŶĐĞĚƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƐƚƵĚŝĞƐĂƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶƉƉĞŶĚŝǆ͘ ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ&ƌĂŵĞʹϳ^ƉĂŶ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ
ďƵƚŵĞŶƚϭŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚũƵƐƚǁĞƐƚŽĨ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶďƵƚŽƵƚƐŝĚĞƚŚĞĐƌĞĞŬĐŚĂŶŶĞů͘/ƚ ŝƐĚĞƐŝƌĂďůĞƚŽĞůĞǀĂƚĞƚŚĞďƌŝĚŐĞƉƌŽĨŝůĞĂƐƋƵŝĐŬůǇĂƐƉŽƐƐŝďůĞƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞĂĚǀĞƌƐĞďĂĐŬǁĂƚĞƌŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽƚŚĞ ĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶĂŶĚŵĂǆŝŵŝǌĞĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞƵŶĚĞƌƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĨŽƌĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ͘dŚĞǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůƉƌŽĨŝůĞ ďĞŐŝŶƐĂƚƚŚĞĐŽŶĨŽƌŵǁŝƚŚǁŝŐŚƚDƵƌƉŚǇ&ŝĞůĚĂŶĚƚŚĞŶĐůŝŵďƐĂƐƋƵŝĐŬůǇĂƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐĂůůŽǁŽŶ ĞĂƌƚŚĞŶĨŝůůũƵƐƚƉƌŝŽƌƚŽďƵƚŵĞŶƚϭ͘ϴйŐƌĂĚĞƐǁŝƚŚϭ͘ϱйƌĞƐƚůĂŶĚŝŶŐƐĞǀĞƌǇϯϬĨĞĞƚĂƌĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞ ĞĂƌƚŚĞŶďƌŝĚŐĞĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚƌĂŵƉ͘ƵůǀĞƌƚƐƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞĨŝůůĐŽƵůĚĂůƐŽďĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƚŽŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĨůŽǁ͘ dŚĞůĞŶŐƚŚŽĨƐƉĂŶϭŝƐĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶĞĚďǇŚǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐŽƉĞŶŝŶŐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐĂŶĚĨƵƚƵƌĞĨůŽŽĚĐŽŶƚƌŽůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ĂůŽŶŐ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ͘dŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƚĞĂŵŵĞƚǁŝƚŚƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞƐĨƌŽŵ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂŽƵŶƚǇ&ůŽŽĚ ŽŶƚƌŽůƚŽďĞƚƚĞƌƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚǁŚĂƚǁŽƌŬŵĂǇŽĐĐƵƌŝŶƚŚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞ͘KŶĞƐƚƵĚǇŚĂƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĨůŽŽĚǁĂůůƐŽŶ ďŽƚŚƚŚĞǁĞƐƚĂŶĚĞĂƐƚďĂŶŬƐďĞůŽǁƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘dŚĞŝƚǇƌĞĞŬƐŝǀŝƐŝŽŶŝƐĂůƐŽƉƌŽƉŽƐŝŶŐĂǁŝĚĞŶŝŶŐŝŶ ƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǀŝĐŝŶŝƚǇďƵƚǁŝƚŚŶĂƚƵƌĂůŝǌĞĚĐƌĞĞŬďĂŶŬƐ͘/ƚŝƐŝŵƉĞƌĂƚŝǀĞƚŚĂƚďƵƚŵĞŶƚϭĂŶĚĞŶƚϮĂƌĞ ůŽĐĂƚĞĚŽƵƚƐŝĚĞƚŚĞƐĞůŝŵŝƚƐƚŽĂůůŽǁƚŚĞĨůŽŽĚǁĂůůƐŽƌǁŝĚĞŶĞĚďĂŶŬƐƚŽďĞŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚďĞůŽǁƚŚĞďƌŝĚŐĞ ůĂƚĞƌǁŝƚŚŽƵƚƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶŐŝŶĨƵƚƵƌĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚƐ͘tŚŝůĞƚŚĞĞǆĂĐƚůŝŵŝƚƐŽĨƚŚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞĐŚĂŶŶĞů ŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐĂƌĞŶŽƚǇĞƚŬŶŽǁŶ͕ĐŽŶǀĞƌƐĂƚŝŽŶƐǁŝƚŚ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂŽƵŶƚǇ&ůŽŽĚŽŶƚƌŽůƐƚĂĨĨƌĞƐƵůƚĞĚŝŶ ĐŽŶĐƵƌƌĞŶĐĞƚŚĂƚĂŶϴϮ͛ͲϬ͟ƐƉĂŶůĞŶŐƚŚǁŽƵůĚďĞĂƌĞĂƐŽŶĂďůĞĂƐƐƵŵƉƚŝŽŶĨŽƌƐƉĂŶϭƚŽĂǀŽŝĚĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚƐ͘dŽ ďĞƐƚďĂůĂŶĐĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶĐǇĂŶĚŵŝŶŝŵŝǌĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚƐ͕ƐŝŵŝůĂƌƐƉĂŶůĞŶŐƚŚƐǁĞƌĞƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚĨŽƌ ƚŚĞƌĞŵĂŝŶŝŶŐƐƉĂŶƐŽĨƚŚĞ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬĨƌĂŵĞ͘ŽƐƚŝƐůŽǁĞƌĞĚŝĨĂƐŝŵŝůĂƌƐƉĂŶůĞŶŐƚŚƐĂƌĞƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚ ďĞĐĂƵƐĞƉƌĞĐĂƐƚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐĐĂŶďĞŵĂƐƐƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚĂƚƚŚĞƐĂŵĞůĞŶŐƚŚĂŶĚĚĞƉƚŚ͘ /ŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽĨůŽŽĚǁĂůůƐ͕ĨƵƚƵƌĞŚǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐĂƌĞƉůĂŶŶĞĚĨŽƌďƌŝĚŐĞƐďŽƚŚƵƉƐƚƌĞĂŵĂŶĚ ĚŽǁŶƐƚƌĞĂŵŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞ͘dŚĞh^ϭϬϭďƌŝĚŐĞƵƉƐƚƌĞĂŵŚĂƐďĞĞŶĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚĨŽƌĂĨƵƚƵƌĞĨůŽǁĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ͘ ƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇ^ƉĂŶƐϭĂŶĚϯŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶďůŽĐŬĞĚŽĨĨďƵƚǁŝůůŚĂǀĞƚŚĞĂďŝůŝƚǇƚŽďĞŽƉĞŶĞĚƚŽĐŽŶǀĞǇŵŽƌĞĨůŽǁ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞh^ϭϬϭďƌŝĚŐĞĂĨƚĞƌĨƵƚƵƌĞĨůŽŽĚĐŽŶƚƌŽůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĐŽŵĞŽŶůŝŶĞ͘dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇŶŽƉůĂŶƐƚŽ ƌĞƉůĂĐĞŽƌŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƚŚĞŚǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐĐĂƉĂĐŝƚǇŽĨƚŚĞhWZZďƌŝĚŐĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚũƵƐƚƵƉƐƚƌĞĂŵŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͕ ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌƚŚŝƐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŝƐŶĞĂƌŝŶŐƚŚĞĞŶĚŽĨŝƚƐƐĞƌǀŝĐĞůŝĨĞƐŽŝƚǁŝůůďĞƌĞƉůĂĐĞĚĂƚƐŽŵĞƉŽŝŶƚŝŶƚŚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞ͘ ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞĂůƐŽƉůĂŶƐƚŽŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞƚŚĞŚǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐĐĂƉĂĐŝƚǇŽĨƐĞǀĞƌĂůďƌŝĚŐĞƐĚŽǁŶƐƚƌĞĂŵ͘dŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶdĞĂŵ ƐĞƚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ^ƉĂŶϭůĞŶŐƚŚƚŽĐŽŶǀĞǇƚŚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞƉůĂŶŶĞĚh^ϭϬϭŚǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐĐĂƉĂĐŝƚǇŽĨ ϯϬϬϬĐĨƐ͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͬďŝĐǇĐůĞďƌŝĚŐĞǁŝůůŚĂǀĞĂŚŝŐŚĞƌƐŽĨĨŝƚĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŶŽŝŶƚĞƌŵĞĚŝĂƚĞ ƉŝĞƌƐ͕ƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞƚŽƚŚĞh^ϭϬϭďƌŝĚŐĞƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶŐŝŶďĞƚƚĞƌŚǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĂŶĐĞƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞƚŽĂŶǇŽĨƚŚĞ ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐ͘
WƌŽĨŝůĞŐƌĂĚĞďƌĞĂŬƐ;ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĨŽƌƌĞƐƚƉůĂƚĨŽƌŵƐŝĨƚŚĞƉƌŽĨŝůĞĞǆĐĞĞĚƐĂϱйƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĞĚŐƌĂĚĞͿǁŝƚŚŝŶĂ ƐƉĂŶĂƌĞůĞƐƐĨĞĂƐŝďůĞďĞĐĂƵƐĞƚŚĞƉƌĞĐĂƐƚŐŝƌĚĞƌƐǁŽƵůĚďĞĨĂďƌŝĐĂƚĞĚĨůĂƚǁŝƚŚŽƵƚŐƌĂĚĞďƌĞĂŬƐ͘'ƌĂĚĞ ďƌĞĂŬƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĂƚƚŚĞĚĞĐŬůĞǀĞůǁŽƵůĚƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶƚŚĞŶĞĞĚŽĨĂŚŝŐŚůǇǀĂƌŝĂďůĞĚĞĐŬĨŝůůĞƚǁŚŝĐŚǁŽƵůĚ ĐŽŵƉůŝĐĂƚĞďƌŝĚŐĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĂďŝůŝƚǇ͘dŚĞďĞƐƚĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚǁŽƵůĚďĞƚŽƉůĂĐĞƉƌŽĨŝůĞŐƌĂĚĞďƌĞĂŬƐĨŽƌƌĞƐƚ ůĂŶĚŝŶŐƐĂƚƚŚĞƐƵƉƉŽƌƚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐƐŽƚŚĂƚŐŝƌĚĞƌƐĐŽƵůĚƌĞŵĂŝŶĨůĂƚ͘hŶĨŽƌƚƵŶĂƚĞůǇ͕ƚŚŝƐǁŽƵůĚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞ ĐŽůƵŵŶƐƚŽďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇĞǀĞƌǇϯϬĨƚƚŽŵĞĞƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘ĚĚŝŶŐƚŚŝƐŵĂŶǇĐŽůƵŵŶƐ ǁŽƵůĚŚĂǀĞĂƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚŝŵƉĂĐƚŽŶǌŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞǁĂƐŶŽƚƉƵƌƐƵĞĚ͘&ŽƌƚƵŶĂƚĞůǇ͕ĂƉƌŽĨŝůĞũƵƐƚ ƵŶĚĞƌϱйĂůůŽǁƐĨŽƌĂĐŽŶƐƚĂŶƚŐƌĂĚĞƐŽĨůĂƚƌĞƐƚůĂŶĚŝŶŐƐĐĂŶďĞĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞĚ͘dŚŝƐŐƌĂĚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐ ĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϲϲϬ͛;ϴϱ͛ĞĂƌƚŚĞŶƌĂŵƉ͕ϱϲϰ͛^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞ&ƌĂŵĞ^ŚŽǁŶďĞůŽǁ͕ĂŶĚϭϭ͛ŽŶƚŚĞh^ϭϬϭ&ƌĂŵĞͿ ĨƌŽŵƚŚĞǁŝŐŚƚDƵƌƉŚǇƚŽƵĐŚĚŽǁŶƚŽƚŚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚhWZZĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ͘^ŝŶĐĞƚŚĞĐŽŶĨŽƌŵ ĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶĂƚǁŝŐŚƚDƵƌƉŚǇŝƐƐĞƚ͕ƚŚĞŵĂǆŐƌĂĚĞĂŶĚhWZZĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂĚŝĐƚĂƚĞĚŚŽǁĨĂƌ ĂƐƚ
ƚŚĞh^ϭϬϭĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐŶĞĞĚĞĚƚŽďĞ͘&ŽƌƚƵŶĂƚĞůǇ͕ƚŚŝƐĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞĨŝƚƐũƵƐƚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞĞĂƐƚĞƌŶƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ ďŽƵŶĚĂƌǇŽĨƚŚĞŝƚǇŽǁŶĞĚƉĂƌĐĞůŽŶƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚƐŝĚĞŽĨh^ϭϬϭ͘ h^ϭϬϭ&ƌĂŵĞʹϭ͕Ϯ͕Žƌϯ^ƉĂŶ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ
dŚĞƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇĐƌĞĂƚĞƐĂĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚĨŽƌĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŵĞƚŚŽĚƐĂŶĚŵĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐƵƐĞĚ ĨŽƌƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘WĞƌƐĞĐƚŝŽŶϱ͘ϱŽĨƚŚĞhWZZ͞'ƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐĨŽƌZĂŝůƌŽĂĚĂŶĚ'ƌĂĚĞ^ĞƉĂƌĂƚŝŽŶWƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͟ƚŚĞ ZĂŝůƌŽĂĚĚŝƐĐŽƵƌĂŐĞƐƚŚĞƵƐĞŽĨĐĂƐƚͲŝŶͲƉůĂĐĞƐƵƉĞƌƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐĂŶĚĞǀĞƌǇĞĨĨŽƌƚƐŚĂůůďĞŵĂĚĞƚŽƵƚŝůŝǌĞĂ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚǇƉĞƚŚĂƚǁŝůůŶŽƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŝŶƚĞƌƌƵƉƚŝŽŶƚŽZĂŝůƌŽĂĚŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĚƵƌŝŶŐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞƵƐĞŽĨĐĂƐƚͲ ŝŶͲƉůĂĐĞďĞĂŵƐŝƐŶŽƚƉĞƌŵŝƚƚĞĚ͘dŚĞƵƐĞŽĨƐƚĂǇŝŶƉůĂĐĞĚĞĐŬĨŽƌŵƐĨŽƌĨĂůƐĞǁŽƌŬďĞƚǁĞĞŶƉƌĞĐĂƐƚ ĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞďĞĂŵƐŽƌƐƚĞĞůŐŝƌĚĞƌƐŝƐĞŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞĚ͘dŚŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚĞƐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĐĂƐƚͲŝŶͲƉůĂĐĞ ĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐƵƉĞƌƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐŽǀĞƌhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ͘ƵĞƚŽƚŚĞƐĞĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐ͕ƉƌĞĐĂƐƚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞŐŝƌĚĞƌƐŽƌ ƉƌĞĨĂďƌŝĐĂƚĞĚƐƚĞĞůƚƌƵƐƐĞƐǁĞƌĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚŵŽƐƚĨĞĂƐŝďůĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚǇƉĞƐ͘^ŝŶĐĞƚŚĞh^ϭϬϭƐƉĂŶŝƐũƵƐƚĂ ĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞhWZZƐƉĂŶ͕ƚŚĞƐĂŵĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚǇƉĞƐǁĞƌĞƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞh^ϭϬϭƐƉĂŶďĞĐĂƵƐĞŝƚ ǁŽƵůĚďĞƵŶĚĞƐŝƌĂďůĞƚŽĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚǇƉĞƐĨŽƌĂŶĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƐƉĂŶ͘ZĞŐĂƌĚůĞƐƐŽĨƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚǇƉĞ ƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚ͕ĂhWZZĨůĂŐŵĂŶǁŽƵůĚďĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĚƵƌŝŶŐĂĐƚŝǀĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽǀĞƌŽƌĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞƚƌĂĐŬ͘dŚŝƐ ĐŽƐƚŵƵƐƚďĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞŽǀĞƌĂůůĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚ͘ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽǀĞƌĂůƚƌĂŶƐƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇǁŽƵůĚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂŶĞŶĐƌŽĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƉĞƌŵŝƚĨƌŽŵĂůƚƌĂŶƐ͘ŝƐĐƵƐƐŝŽŶƐ ǁŝƚŚĂůƚƌĂŶƐƐƚĂĨĨŚĂƐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞĚƚŚĞǇĂƌĞŽƉĞŶƚŽůĂŶĞĐůŽƐƵƌĞƐĚƵƌŝŶŐŐŝƌĚĞƌŽƌƚƌƵƐƐĞƌĞĐƚŝŽŶ͘ĂůƚƌĂŶƐ ĚĞƐŝƌĞƐƚŽŬĞĞƉĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨƚǁŽůĂŶĞƐŽƉĞŶĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞĚĂǇĂŶĚŽŶĞůĂŶĞŽƉĞŶĂƚŶŝŐŚƚ͘^ƉĞĐŝĨŝĐŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ ƚŽĂůƚƌĂŶƐƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇĚĞƉĞŶĚŽŶƚŚĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚ͘/ŶŐĞŶĞƌĂů͕ƚŚĞĐůĞĂƌƐƉĂŶŚĂƐƚŚĞůŽǁĞƐƚ ƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚŝŵƉĂĐƚĨŽůůŽǁĞĚďǇƚŚĞƚǁŽƐƉĂŶĂŶĚƚŚĞŶƚŚĞƚŚƌĞĞͲƐƉĂŶĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞ͘ ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
h^ϭϬϭ&ƌĂŵĞ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞϭ͗^ŝŶŐůĞ^ƉĂŶ
dŚĞŵĂŝŶƐƉĂŶĐŽŶƐŝƐƚƐŽĨĂƐŝŶŐůĞΕϮϮϱ͛ƉƌĞĨĂďƌŝĐĂƚĞĚƐƚĞĞůƚƌƵƐƐƚŚĂƚƐƉĂŶƐĂĐƌŽƐƐh^ϭϬϭĂŶĚƚŚĞƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚ ǁŝƚŚŽƵƚŝŶƚĞƌŵĞĚŝĂƚĞƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐ͘dŚŝƐŽƉƚŝŽŶǁŽƵůĚŶŽƚƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚůǇŝŵƉĂĐƚƚŚĞĂůƚƌĂŶƐƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇĂůŽŶŐ ƚŚĞŚŝŐŚǁĂǇ͕ŽƌhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚ͘dŚĞƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐĐŽŶƚƌŽůƚŚĞ ƉƌŽĨŝůĞŐƌĂĚĞŽĨƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ĂŶĚƚŚŝƐŽƉƚŝŽŶĚŽĞƐŶŽƚĂůůŽǁĨŽƌĂŐƌĂĚĞďƌĞĂŬǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞh^ϭϬϭƐƉĂŶ͘dŚŝƐ ƌĞƐƵůƚƐŝŶĂŚŝŐŚĞƌŽǀĞƌĂůůƉƌŽĨŝůĞĨŽƌƚŚĞďƌŝĚŐĞ͘dŚŝƐĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞŵĂǇďĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚƚŚĞŵŽƐƚĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐĂůůǇ ƉůĞĂƐŝŶŐ͕ǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŵŽƐƚĂĚĂƉƚĂďŝůŝƚǇƚŽƚŚĞŝƚǇ͛ƐĚĞƐŝŐŶƉƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƐ͘ /ƚƐŚŽƵůĚďĞŶŽƚĞĚƚŚĂƚƵƚŝůŝǌŝŶŐĂƐƚĞĞůƚƌƵƐƐƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞƚŽĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐǁŽƵůĚƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶĂŚŝŐŚĞƌůŽŶŐ ƚĞƌŵŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞďƵƌĚĞŶĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƚǇĚƵĞƚŽƉĂŝŶƚŝŶŐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘tĞĂƚŚĞƌŝŶŐƐƚĞĞůǁŚŝĐŚĚŽĞƐŶŽƚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƉĂŝŶƚŝŶŐǁĂƐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚƚŽŚĞůƉƌĞĚƵĐĞĨƵƚƵƌĞŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞĐŽƐƚƐ͕ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌƚŚŝƐƚƌĞĂƚŵĞŶƚŝƐŶŽƚ ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚƐŽĐůŽƐĞƚŽƚŚĞĐŽƌƌŽƐŝǀĞŵĂƌŝŶĞĂƚŵŽƐƉŚĞƌĞ͘ƵĞƚŽƚŚĞƉƌŽǆŝŵŝƚǇŽĨƚŚĞŽĐĞĂŶ͕ƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶ ƚĞĂŵƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƐƚǁŽůĂǇĞƌƐŽĨƉƌŽƚĞĐƚŝŽŶďǇďŽƚŚŐĂůǀĂŶŝǌŝŶŐĂŶĚƉĂŝŶƚŝŶŐƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůƐƚĞĞů͘WĂŝŶƚŝŶŐ ƚŚŝƐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇĞǀĞƌǇϮϬǇĞĂƌƐǁŝůůďĞĐŽƐƚůǇĂŶĚĂůƐŽƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚĂůƚƌĂŶƐĂŶĚ hWZZƚŽŽďƚĂŝŶĂĐĐĞƐƐĨŽƌƉĂŝŶƚŝŶŐŽǀĞƌƚŚĞŝƌƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ͘dŚŝƐŝƐƚŚĞƐŝŶŐůĞůĂƌŐĞƐƚĚƌĂǁďĂĐŬƚŽƚŚŝƐ ĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞ͘
dŚĞĐŽŶƚƌĂĐƚŽƌĐŽƵůĚĐŚŽŽƐĞďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚǁŽƉƌŝŵĂƌǇĞƌĞĐƚŝŽŶŵĞƚŚŽĚƐ͘&ŽƌƚŚĞƐŝŶŐůĞƐƉĂŶƚƌƵƐƐƚŚĞǇĐŽƵůĚ ĂƐƐĞŵďůĞƚŚĞĞŶƚŝƌĞϮϮϱĨŽŽƚƚƌƵƐƐŝŶƚŚĞŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚƉĂƌĂůůĞůƚŽh^ϭϬϭĂŶĚƚŚĞŶƐǁŝŶŐŝƚϵϬĚĞŐƌĞĞƐ ŽǀĞƌh^ϭϬϭŝŶƚŽƉůĂĐĞĚƵƌŝŶŐĂŶŝŐŚƚĐůŽƐƵƌĞ͘ƐĞĐŽŶĚĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚǁŽƵůĚďĞƚŽƵƚŝůŝǌĞŽŶĞŽƌŵŽƌĞƐƉůŝĐĞ ƚŽǁĞƌƐ͘dŚĞĨŝƌƐƚƚŽǁĞƌĐŽƵůĚďĞďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞhWZZĂŶĚĂůƚƌĂŶƐƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇŝŶƚŚĞƐŚŽƵůĚĞƌĂŶĚƚŚĞ ƐĞĐŽŶĚĐŽƵůĚďĞǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞEͬ^ŵĞĚŝĂŶ͘dŚŝƐĐŽƵůĚĂůůŽǁƚŚĞƚƌƵƐƐƚŽďĞƉŝĐŬĞĚŝŶƚǁŽŽƌŵŽƌĞƉŝĞĐĞƐ ĂŶĚƚŚĞŶƐƉůŝĐĞĚƚŽŐĞƚŚĞƌďĞĨŽƌĞƚŚĞƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇƚŽǁĞƌƐĂƌĞƌĞŵŽǀĞĚ͘ WƌŽƐ͗
• EŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚŽƵƚƐŝĚĞŽĨŝƚǇƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ
• ZĞĚƵĐĞĚŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨĐŽůƵŵŶƐĂŶĚƉŝůĞƐƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶůŽǁĞƌĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚƐ • >ŽǁĞƐƚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĐŽŶƚƌŽůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚŽŶh^ϭϬϭŽƵƚŽĨĂůůĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐ • DŽƐƚĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐĨůĞǆŝďŝůŝƚǇ
• ZĞĚƵĐĞĚƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞĚƵĞƚŽƌĞŵŽǀĂůŽĨĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůŝŶƚĞƌŵĞĚŝĂƚĞƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐ ŽŶƐ͗
• DĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐĨŽƌƐƚĞĞůĂƌĞƚǇƉŝĐĂůůǇŚŝŐŚĞƌƚŚĂŶĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ • ŚĂůůĞŶŐŝŶŐĐƌĂŶĞůŝĨƚƚŽƉůĂĐĞƚƌƵƐƐĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ
• dĂůůĞƌƉƌŽĨŝůĞƚŽĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐǁŝƚŚŽƵƚŵĂŝŶƐƉĂŶŐƌĂĚĞďƌĞĂŬ ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
h^ϭϬϭ&ƌĂŵĞ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞϮ͗dǁŽ^ƉĂŶDĂŝŶƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ dŚŝƐŽƉƚŝŽŶĐŽŶƐŝƐƚƐŽĨϮƐƉĂŶƐĂĐƌŽƐƐh^ϭϬϭĂŶĚhWZZ͘ƐŝŶŐůĞͲĐŽůƵŵŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚǁŽƵůĚďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚŽƵƚƐŝĚĞ ŽĨƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚƐŚŽƵůĚĞƌŽĨh^ϭϬϭ͕ǁŝƚŚŝŶĂůƚƌĂŶƐƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ͘dŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĐŽƵůĚďĞĞŝƚŚĞƌĂƉƌĞĐĂƐƚ ĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞŐŝƌĚĞƌŽƌĂƉƌĞĨĂďƌŝĐĂƚĞĚƐƚĞĞůƚƌƵƐƐ͘dŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶdĞĂŵƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƐƉƌĞĐĂƐƚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞŐŝƌĚĞƌƐ ŐŝǀĞŶƚŚĞůŽǁĞƌƐƉĂŶůĞŶŐƚŚĂŶĚĚĞƐŝƌĞƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞĨƵƚƵƌĞŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞĐŽƐƚƐ͘WƌĞĐĂƐƚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞŐŝƌĚĞƌƐ ǁŽƵůĚĐŽŶƐŝƐƚŽĨϮĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚƐƵƉĞƌƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐĨŽƌĞĂĐŚƐƉĂŶ͕ŽŶĞǁŝƚŚĂϰ͛ĚĞƉƚŚŽǀĞƌhWZZ͕ĂŶĚ ŽŶĞǁŝƚŚĂϲ͛Ͳϲ͟ĚĞƉƚŚŽǀĞƌh^ϭϬϭ͘dŚŝƐĚŝƐĐŽŶƚŝŶƵŽƵƐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŝƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƚŽŵĞĞƚĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐŽǀĞƌhWZZ͕ĂŶĚƐƉĂŶůĞŶŐƚŚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐŽǀĞƌh^ϭϬϭǁŚŝůĞŵŝŶŝŵŝǌŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌŽĨŝůĞŽĨƚŚĞ ďƌŝĚŐĞĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚ͘dŚŝƐĚŽĞƐƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶƚŚĞůĞĂƐƚĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐĂůůǇƉůĞĂƐŝŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶŽƵƚƚŚĞϯ h^ϭϬϭĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐĚƵĞƚŽĂǀĂƌŝĂďůĞĚĞƉƚŚďƵƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐĂĨĞĂƐŝďůĞϮͲƐƉĂŶĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚŵŝŶŝŵĂů ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽĂůƚƌĂŶƐƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ͘
WƌŽƐ͗
• WƌĞĐĂƐƚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞŐŝƌĚĞƌƐŵŝŶŝŵŝǌĞĨĂůƐĞǁŽƌŬƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ • WƌĞĐĂƐƚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞŐŝƌĚĞƌƐŵŝŶŝŵŝǌĞŵĂŝŶƚĞŶĂŶĐĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐŽĨƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ • ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚĐŽůƵŵŶŽŶŵĂŝŶƐƉĂŶĐĂŶďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚŽƵƚƐŝĚĞŽĨĂůƚƌĂŶƐƐŚŽƵůĚĞƌ͕ŵŝŶŝŵŝǌŝŶŐŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽ ƚƌĂĨĨŝĐ
• ZĞĚƵĐĞĚŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐŝŶĐŽŵƉĂƌŝƐŽŶƚŽůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞϯ ŽŶƐ͗
• ĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐĂůůǇĚŝƐĐŽŶƚŝŶƵŽƵƐŵĂŝŶƐƉĂŶ
• ZĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĐŽůƵŵŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŝŶĂůƚƌĂŶƐƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ
• ZĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůďƌŝĚŐĞũŽŝŶƚĂŶĚĐŽǀĞƌƉůĂƚĞĂƚĞŶƚϵ • ŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůĚĞƉƚŚƐĂŶĚŵĞŵďĞƌƐƌĞĚƵĐĞĞĨĨŝĐŝĞŶĐǇŽĨƐŝŵŝůĂƌƉƌĞĐĂƐƚĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
h^ϭϬϭ&ƌĂŵĞ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞϯ͗dŚƌĞĞ^ƉĂŶDĂŝŶƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ dŚŝƐŽƉƚŝŽŶĐŽŶƐŝƐƚƐŽĨϮŝŶƚĞƌŵĞĚŝĂƚĞƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞŵĂŝŶƐƉĂŶ͘KŶĞŽĨƚŚĞƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐǁŽƵůĚďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚ ŽƵƚƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚƐŚŽƵůĚĞƌŽŶh^ϭϬϭ͕ǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŽƚŚĞƌƐƵƉƉŽƌƚǁŽƵůĚďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŵĞĚŝĂŶŽĨh^ ϭϬϭ͘ dŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĚĞƉƚŚǁŽƵůĚďĞĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚĂĐƌŽƐƐĂůůƚŚƌĞĞƐƉĂŶƐ͕ŵĂŬŝŶŐĨŽƌĂŵŽƌĞƉůĞĂƐŝŶŐĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐ ĚĞƐŝŐŶ͘dŚĞƚŚƌĞĞͲƐƉĂŶŵĂŝŶĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐǁŽƵůĚĐŽŶƐŝƐƚŽĨƉƌĞĐĂƐƚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞŐŝƌĚĞƌƐ͕ĐŽŶƚŝŶƵŽƵƐĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐ͘dŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĚĞƉƚŚǁŽƵůĚďĞϰ͛ͲϬ͟ŽŶĂůůƐƉĂŶƐ͕ǁŚŝůĞƚŚĞƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐǁŽƵůĚĂůůŽǁĨŽƌŐƌĂĚĞďƌĞĂŬƐ ĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞŵĂŝŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘'ƌĂĚĞďƌĞĂŬƐĂůůŽǁĨŽƌƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚŽŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ͕ƚŚĞŶďƌĞĂŬƚŽĂůŽǁĞƌĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶĂĐƌŽƐƐh^ϭϬϭ͘dŚŝƐƌĞƐƵůƚƐŝŶĂ ůŽǁĞƌĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽĨŝůĞĂĐƌŽƐƐƚŚĞŵĂŝŶƐƉĂŶ͕ĞƐƉĞĐŝĂůůǇĂƚƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶĞŶĚŽĨďƌŝĚŐĞ͘ WƌŽƐ͗
• ZĞĚƵĐĞĚƐƉĂŶůĞŶŐƚŚƐĂůůŽǁĨŽƌĨůĞǆŝďůĞƐƵƉĞƌƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĚĞƐŝŐŶ • ZĞĚƵĐĞĚƐƵďƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞůŽĂĚŝŶŐĨƌŽŵƌĞĚƵĐĞĚƐƉĂŶůĞŶŐƚŚƐ • ŽŶƚŝŶƵŽƵƐĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐ
ŽŶƐ͗
• ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĂůƚƌĂŶƐƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ
• ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĐŽƐƚƐ ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
EŽƌƚŚ^ƚĂĐŬĞĚZĂŵƉ&ƌĂŵĞ
dŚŝƐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞǁĂƐĚƌŝǀĞŶďǇƌŝŐŚƚŽĨ
ǁĂǇĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐĂŶĚƚŚĞŶĞĞĚĨŽƌĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵ
ŚŽƌŝǌŽŶƚĂůĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚĨŽŽƚƉƌŝŶƚǁŚŝůĞŶŽƚ
ĞǆĐĞĞĚŝŶŐƚŚĞŵĂǆŝŵƵŵŐƌĂĚĞƐ͘ƐƚĂĐŬĞĚ
ƌĂŵƉƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚŚĂƚƌĂŵƉƐƵƉͬĚŽǁŶǁĂƌĚǁŝƚŚ
ƐĞǀĞƌĂůůĞǀĞůƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůůǇŽǀĞƌƚŚĞƚŽƉŽĨ
ĞĂĐŚŽƚŚĞƌǁĂƐƚŚĞŽŶůǇǁĂǇƚŽĂĐŚŝĞǀĞƚŚĞ
ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚŐƌĂĚĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŚŽƌŝǌŽŶƚĂůƐƉĂĐĞ
ĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐŽĨƚŚĞĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞƉĂƌĐĞů͘^ŝŶĐĞƚŚĞƐƉĂŶ
ůĞŶŐƚŚƐĂƌĞƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞůǇƐŚŽƌƚ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞŶŽ
ƐĐŚĞĚƵůĞŽƌǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚ
ƉƌĞĐůƵĚĞƵƐĞŽĨĨĂůƐĞǁŽƌŬ͕ĐĂƐƚͲŝŶͲƉůĂĐĞ
ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŝƐƚŚĞŵŽƐƚĞĐŽŶŽŵŝĐĂůƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ
ƚǇƉĞĂƚƚŚŝƐůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘
dŚĞŝƚǇĚŝĚŶŽƚǁĂŶƚƚŽƉƵƌƐƵĞĂ͞ĐŽƌŬƐĐƌĞǁ͟
ĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶƐŝŵŝůĂƌƚŽƚŚĞŝƚǇh^ϭϬϭ
ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͬďŝĐǇĐůĞŽǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐĂƚŶĂƉĂŵƵĂŶĚ
tĂůŶƵƚǀĞŶƵĞ͘dŚŝƐĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶǁĂƐŶŽƚ
ĚĞƐŝƌĞĚĚƵĞƚŽůŝŵŝƚĞĚƐŝŐŚƚĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ͕ƐƚĞĞƉĞƌ
ŶŽŶͲĐŽŵƉůŝĂŶƚŐƌĂĚĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĂŶŽǀĞƌĂůů
ĚĂƌŬͬĐŽŶĨŝŶĞĚĨĞĞůŝŶŐ͘
tŚŝůĞƚŚĞƐƚĂĐŬĞĚƌĂŵƉƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŝƐĂƐŝŵŝůĂƌ
ĐŽŶĐĞƉƚŝƚǁŝůůĨĞĞůŵƵĐŚĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚƚŚĂŶƚŚĞ
ŶĂƉĂŵƵͬtĂůŶƵƚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ
ƐƚĂĐŬĞĚƌĂŵƉǁŝůůŚĂǀĞŵŽƌĞŐƌĂĚƵĂůŐƌĂĚĞƐǁŝƚŚ
ĨƌĞƋƵĞŶƚůĞǀĞůůĂŶĚŝŶŐƐĨŽƌƌĞƐƚŝŶŐ͘'ŝǀĞŶƚŚĞ
ůŽŶŐĞƌƌĂŵƉƐĂŶĚƐŝĚĞďǇƐŝĚĞĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶƐŝŐŚƚĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞǁŝůůďĞŵƵĐŚŝŵƉƌŽǀĞĚ͘>ĂƐƚƚŚĞǀĞƌƚŝĐĂů ĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞďĞƚǁĞĞŶƌĂŵƉƐǁŝůůďĞĂƚůĞĂƐƚϭϬĨĞĞƚ͘dŚŝƐǁŝůůůĞƚŝŶŵƵĐŚŵŽƌĞŶĂƚƵƌĂůůŝŐŚƚ͘ƐŝŵŝůĂƌ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŝƐƐŚŽǁŶŝŶƚŚĞƉŚŽƚŽƐďĞůŽǁ͘
ŵŽƌĞĚŝƌĞĐƚƐƚĂŝƌĐĂƐĞŽƉƚŝŽŶĨƌŽŵ
ŐƌŽƵŶĚůĞǀĞůƚŽƚŚĞƵƉƉĞƌĨůŝŐŚƚ
ǁĂƐĂůƐŽƐƚƵĚŝĞĚĨŽƌƵƐĞƌƐƚŚĂƚ
ǁĂŶƚƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞƚŚĞŝƌƚƌĂǀĞů
ĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞĂŶĚƚŝŵĞ͘dŚĞdĞĂŵ
ĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚƚŚĂƚĂƐƚĂŝƌĐĂƐĞŽƉƚŝŽŶ
ǁĂƐĨĞĂƐŝďůĞǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƐƉĂĐĞ
ĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐĂŶĚŝƐƐŚŽǁŶĂƐĂŶ
ŽƉƚŝŽŶŽŶƚŚĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƐƚƵĚǇ
ůĂǇŽƵƚ͘dŚĞdĞĂŵƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚ
ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂŽĚĞŽĨZĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐdŝƚůĞ
ϴ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϯϮϯϭĂŶĚĐŚĂƉƚĞƌϱ
ĨŽƌƚŚĞƐƚĂŝƌĚĞƐŝŐŶĐƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ͘
ƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϰϴƐƚĞƉƐĂƐƐƵŵŝŶŐĂƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚϳ͟ƌŝƐĞƚŽϭϭ͟ƌƵŶƚƌĞĂĚƉĂƚƚĞƌŶĂůŽŶŐǁŝƚŚƚǁŽƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ ŝŶƚĞƌŵĞĚŝĂƚĞůĂŶĚŝŶŐƐǁĞƌĞŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇƚŽĞůĞǀĂƚĞĨĂĐŝůŝƚǇƵƐĞƌƐĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϮϴĨĞĞƚǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůůǇ͘ ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
Z/',dK&tz
dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŚĂƐƚŚĞ
ƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůƚŽĂĨĨĞĐƚƚŚƌĞĞ
ƉƌŝŵĂƌǇƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ
ŽǁŶĞƌƐ͘dŚĞŝƚǇŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂ
ĂƌďĂƌĂŽǁŶƚŚĞŵĂũŽƌŝƚǇ
ŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇǁŚŝĐŚ
ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐǁŝŐŚƚDƵƌƉŚǇ
&ŝĞůĚ͕^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂŽŽ͕
ĂŶĚŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶƉĂƌĐĞů
ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞ
ĂŶĂĚĂͬWŝƚŽƐ^ƚƌĞĞƚĐƵůͲĚĞͲ
ƐĂĐ͘ĂůƚƌĂŶƐŽǁŶƐƚŚĞh^
ϭϬϭƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇƚŚĂƚŝƐ
ĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϭϰϱĨĞĞƚ
ǁŝĚĞĂƚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ
ĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ͘hŶŝŽŶWĂĐŝĨŝĐ
ZĂŝůƌŽĂĚ;hWZZͿŽǁŶƐƚŚĞ
ƌĂŝůůŝŶĞƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇƚŚĂƚŝƐ
ĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϳϯĨĞĞƚǁŝĚĞ
ĂƚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ
ůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂŽƵŶƚǇ&ůŽŽĚŽŶƚƌŽůǁŝůůĂůƐŽďĞŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇĨŽƌƚŚĞĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ ůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŽǀĞƌ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ͘
ZŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇŝƐĂƉƌŝŵĂƌǇƉƌŽũĞĐƚĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚĂŶĚŐƌĞĂƚůǇŝŶĨůƵĞŶĐĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚƐĂŶĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚǇƉĞƐ͘ ĨƚĞƌĞǆƚĞŶƐŝǀĞƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ͕ŝƚǁĂƐĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶǌŽŽƉĂƌĐĞůĐŚĂŝŶůŝŶŬĨĞŶĐĞĂŶĚ ŵĂŶǇŽĨƚŚĞƚƌĞĞƐͬůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉŝŶŐĂƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ͘dŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇŝƐ ůŽĐĂƚĞĚũƵƐƚŶŽƌƚŚŽĨƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĂƐƉŚĂůƚůŝŵŝƚƐ͘dŚŝƐĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĞůĞǀĂƚĞĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞďĞ ůŽĐĂƚĞĚĨƵƌƚŚĞƌƚŽƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚ͕ĂŶĚĞŶƚŝƌĞůǇŽǀĞƌƚŚĞƚŽƉŽĨƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǌŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚ͘ ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐǁĞƌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƚŽĂǀŽŝĚĂŶǇƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞϳϯĨĞĞƚǁŝĚĞhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ͘ ĞƉĞŶĚŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚ͕ƚŚĞƌĞĐŽƵůĚďĞǌĞƌŽ͕ŽŶĞŽƌƚǁŽĐŽůƵŵŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞĂůƚƌĂŶƐƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ͘/ĨĂĐůĞĂƌƐƉĂŶŝƐŶŽƚƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚ͕ŽŶĞĐŽůƵŵŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚũƵƐƚŶŽƌƚŚŽĨƚŚĞ hWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇďƵƚƐŽƵƚŚŽĨƚŚĞh^ϭϬϭĞĚŐĞŽĨƉĂǀĞŵĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůůǇŽŶĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůĐŽůƵŵŶ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĐŽƵůĚďĞƉůĂĐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞŵĞĚŝĂŶďĞƚǁĞĞŶŶŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚĂŶĚƐŽƵƚŚďŽƵŶĚƚƌĂĨĨŝĐ͘ůůƌĞŵĂŝŶŝŶŐ ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐǁŽƵůĚďĞǁŝƚŚŝŶŝƚǇƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ͘
KŶƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƚŚĞƌĞŝƐĂƚƌŝĂŶŐƵůĂƌĂůƚƌĂŶƐƉĂƌĐĞů;ƉŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨďůŽĐŬϯϲϳͿƚŚĂƚĞǆƚĞŶĚƐ ŝŶƚŽƚŚĞŝƚǇƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇŽŶƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞƐŽƵŶĚǁĂůů͘dŚĞƌĞŝƐĂůƐŽĂϭ͛ĂůƚƌĂŶƐƐŽƵŶĚǁĂůů ĞĂƐĞŵĞŶƚ͘/ƚŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚĂůƚƌĂŶƐǁŽƵůĚƌĞůŝŶƋƵŝƐŚƚŚŝƐƚƌŝĂŶŐƵůĂƌƉĂƌĐĞůƚŽƚŚĞŝƚǇĂƐƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘KƚŚĞƌƚŚĂŶƚƌĂŶƐĨĞƌŽĨƚŚŝƐƉĂƌĐĞů͕ŶŽŽƚŚĞƌƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇƚĂŬĞƐĂƌĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŽďĞ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘
^ĞĞƉƉĞŶĚŝǆ
ĨŽƌĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůZŝŐŚƚŽĨtĂǇůŝŵŝƚƐ͘
ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
hd/>/d/
^
dŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƵƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚƵĚǇƌĞĂĂŶĚŵĂǇďĞĂĨĨĞĐƚĞĚďǇƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͗ hƚŝůŝƚǇ hƚŝůŝƚǇKǁŶĞƌ /ŶŽŶĨůŝĐƚ͍
KǀĞƌŚĞĂĚ
ůĞĐƚƌŝĐ ^ŽƵƚŚĞƌŶĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ
ĚŝƐŽŶ ŽŶĨůŝĐƚĂůŽŶŐƐŽƵƚŚĞƌŶhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨ
ǁĂǇĂŶĚĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞ^ƵŶƌŝƐĞZs
WĂƌŬ͘
KǀĞƌŚĞĂĚ
dĞůĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ
&ƌŽŶƚŝĞƌͬŽǆĂďůĞ ŽŶĨůŝĐƚĂůŽŶŐƐŽƵƚŚĞƌŶhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨ ǁĂǇĂŶĚĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞ^ƵŶƌŝƐĞZs
WĂƌŬ͘
^ĞǁĞƌ ŝƚǇŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂ WŽƐƐŝďůĞĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚǁŝƚŚŝŶŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚ͘ /ƚŵĂǇďĞƉŽƐƐŝďůĞĨŽƌƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŽŵŝƐƐ
ƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐůŝŶĞĂĨƚĞƌůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ^ĞǁĞƌ
ŝƐĐŽŶĨŝƌŵĞĚ͘
^ƚŽƌŵƌĂŝŶ ŝƚǇŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂ WŽƐƐŝďůĞĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚũƵƐƚŶŽƌƚŚŽĨƐŽƵŶĚǁĂůů ƚŽƚŚĞĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶƉŽŝŶƚĂƚƚŚĞĐƵůͲĚĞͲ
ƐĂĐŽĨWŝƚŽƐͬĂŶĂĚĂƐƚƌĞĞƚ͘
ZĞĐůĂŝŵĞĚtĂƚĞƌ ŝƚǇŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂ WŽƐƐŝďůĞĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚŶĞĂƌƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĞƌŶ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚĐŽŶĨŽƌŵĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞ
ƌĞĞŬ͘/ƚŵĂǇďĞƉŽƐƐŝďůĞĨŽƌƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƚŽ
ŵŝƐƐƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐůŝŶĞĂĨƚĞƌůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ
^ĞǁĞƌŝƐĐŽŶĨŝƌŵĞĚ͘
WŽƚŚŽůŝŶŐƚŽƉŽƐŝƚŝǀĞůǇůŽĐĂƚĞƚŚĞĚĞƉƚŚƐĂŶĚŚŽƌŝǌŽŶƚĂůůŝŵŝƚƐŽĨƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƵŶĚĞƌŐƌŽƵŶĚƵƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐƐŚŽƵůĚ ďĞĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŶĞǆƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚƉŚĂƐĞ͘ZĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨŽǀĞƌŚĞĂĚƵƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐǁŝůůďĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘ ĚũƵƐƚŵĞŶƚƐƚŽŵĂŶŚŽůĞƐ͕ǀĂůǀĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƐƚŽƌŵĚƌĂŝŶŝŶůĞƚƐŵĂǇďĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĚĞƉĞŶĚŝŶŐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ ůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĐŽƵůĚĂůƐŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƵƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͕ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌƚŚŝƐŵĂǇƌĞƋƵŝƌĞďŽƚŚĂƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇ ĂŶĚƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚƌĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘
ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ

Es/ZKED
Ed>^dh/
^
dŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůƐƚƵĚǇĂƌĞĂŐĞŶĞƌĂůůǇĞŶĐŽŵƉĂƐƐĞƐƚŚĞĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘

ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů^ƉĞĐŝĂůŝƐƚƐĨƌŽŵ^tƵƐĞĚƚŚĞ^ƚƵĚǇƌĞĂĂƐƚŚĞŐĞŶĞƌĂůďŽƵŶĚĂƌǇĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƌǁŽƌŬ͘ĞůŽǁ ŝƐĂďƌŝĞĨƐǇŶŽƉƐŝƐŽĨƚŚĞƌĞƐƵůƚƐŽĨƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶ ƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚƚŽĚĂƚĞ͘
WƌŝŽƌƚŽĐŽŶĚƵĐƚŝŶŐŽŶͲƐŝƚĞƐƵƌǀĞǇ͕^tƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚĂůŝƚĞƌĂƚƵƌĞĂŶĚĚĂƚĂďĂƐĞƌĞǀŝĞǁƚŽĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞǁŚŝĐŚ ƐĞŶƐŝƚŝǀĞƐƉĞĐŝĞƐŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞǀŝĐŝŶŝƚǇŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘dŚŝƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚĂϱͲŵŝůĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ ƌĂĚŝƵƐƵƐŝŶŐƚŚĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂEĂƚƵƌĂůŝǀĞƌƐŝƚǇĂƚĂďĂƐĞ;EͿ͕EW^ ůĞĐƚƌŽŶŝĐ/ŶǀĞŶƚŽƌǇ͕ĂŶĚƌĞǀŝĞǁŽĨ
ĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚĨŽƌŽƚŚĞƌƐŝŶƚŚĞŐĞŶĞƌĂůĂƌĞĂ͘^tĂůƐŽƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĚĂŶ ƵŶŽĨĨŝĐŝĂůƐƉĞĐŝĞƐůŝƐƚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞhŶŝƚĞĚ^ƚĂƚĞƐ&ŝƐŚĂŶĚtŝůĚůŝĨĞ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ;h^&t^Ϳ͕ǁŚŝĐŚƌĞĂĨĨŝƌŵĞĚƚŚĞ EƌĞĐŽƌĚƐĂŶĚƐĞŐŵĞŶƚĞĚƚŚĞŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨƐƉĞĐŝĞƐĨŽƌĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ͘

ǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƚƌĞĞĚĂƚĂǁĂƐĐŽůůĞĐƚĞĚďǇƚŚĞƐƵƌǀĞǇƚĞĂŵĂŶĚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚƐƉĞĐŝĞƐǁĂƐǀĞƌŝĨŝĞĚďǇ^t͘ ĞĐĂƵƐĞĂůůƚŚĞůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞƚƌĞĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚǁŝůůďĞƌĞŵŽǀĞĚ͕ǁŝƚŚŶŽŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŝŶŐƚƌĞĞƐƚŚĂƚ ǁŽƵůĚďĞĂĨĨĞĐƚĞĚ͕ĂŶĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐŽĨƉƌŽũĞĐƚĞĚĚĂŵĂŐĞŽĨƚŚĞĐƌƵĐŝĂůƌŽŽƚǌŽŶĞǁĂƐŶŽƚŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇ͘ EŽƉƌŽƚŽĐŽůͲůĞǀĞůƐƵƌǀĞǇƐĨŽƌǁŝůĚůŝĨĞǁĞƌĞĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚĂƐƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞƐƵƌǀĞǇ͕ŶŽƌǁĞƌĞĂŶǇĨŽĐƵƐĞĚ ďŽƚĂŶŝĐĂůƐƵƌǀĞǇƐĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚ͘ZĞŐĂƌĚůĞƐƐ͕ŝƚŝƐǀĞƌǇƵŶůŝŬĞůǇƚŚĂƚĂŶǇŽĨƚŚĞƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůƉůĂŶƚƐƉĞĐŝĞƐŽĨ ĐŽŶĐĞƌŶǁŽƵůĚŽĐĐƵƌǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞĚƵĞƚŽƚŚĞǀĞƌǇƵƌďĂŶĂŶĚĚŝƐƚƵƌďĞĚŶĂƚƵƌĞŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ĂƌĞĂ͘
ĨŽƌŵĂůĂƋƵĂƚŝĐƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐĚĞůŝŶĞĂƚŝŽŶǁĂƐŶŽƚĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚ͖ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ƚŚĞďŽƵŶĚĂƌŝĞƐŽĨƚŚĞƐƚĂƚĞ ũƵƌŝƐĚŝĐƚŝŽŶǁĞƌĞŵĂƉƉĞĚƐŝŶĐĞƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞǁŽƵůĚĐƌŽƐƐŽǀĞƌ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬĂŶĚƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶƚŚĞƌĞŵŽǀĂů ŽĨƐŽŵĞƌŝƉĂƌŝĂŶǀĞŐĞƚĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞƉŝĞƌƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐĂƌĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŽďĞŽƵƚƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞĐŚĂŶŶĞů͘EŽ ƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐǁŽƵůĚŽĐĐƵƌďĞůŽǁƚŚĞKƌĚŝŶĂƌǇ,ŝŐŚͲtĂƚĞƌDĂƌŬ͘ &ŽƌĂŵŽƌĞĚĞƚĂŝůĞĚ
ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶƐĞĞƉƉĞŶĚŝǆ&͘WƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌǇ ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů^ƚƵĚǇ;W
^Ϳ
ĨŽƌŵŚĂƐďĞĞŶĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚƚŽŚĞůƉƐĐŽƉĞƚŚĞƐƚƵĚŝĞƐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞĨŝŶĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶƉŚĂƐĞ͘ WůĂŶƚ^ƉĞĐŝĞƐŽĨŽŶĐĞƌŶ
dŚĞh^&t^͕E͕ĂŶĚZWZƐƉĞĐŝĞƐůŝƐƚƐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞϭϰƐƉĞĐŝĂůͲƐƚĂƚƵƐƉůĂŶƚƚĂǆĂ;ĨĞĚĞƌĂůůǇůŝƐƚĞĚ͕ƐƚĂƚĞ ůŝƐƚĞĚ͕ĂŶĚͬŽƌZWZ>ŝƐƚϭ͕Ϯ͕ŽƌϰͿĂƐŽĐĐƵƌƌŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŝŶĂϱͲŵŝůĞƌĂĚŝƵƐŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞ͘ŶĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐŽĨ ƚŚĞƌĂŶŐĞĂŶĚŚĂďŝƚĂƚƉƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƐǁĞƌĞĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚƚŽŝĚĞŶƚŝĨǇǁŚŝĐŚƐƉĞĐŝĂůͲƐƚĂƚƵƐƉůĂŶƚƐƉĞĐŝĞƐŚĂǀĞƚŚĞ ƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůƚŽŽĐĐƵƌǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ^͘dŚĞĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŚĂďŝƚĂƚ͕ĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƌĞƐƵůƚƐŽĨƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐ ƐƵƌǀĞǇƐĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚĨŽƌŽƚŚĞƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ͕ĂŶĚƐŽŝůƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ^͘ƐĂƌĞƐƵůƚ͕^tĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚŝƚŝƐƵŶůŝŬĞůǇ ƚŚĂƚƚŚĞ^ƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐƐƵŝƚĂďůĞŚĂďŝƚĂƚĨŽƌĂŶǇŽĨƚŚĞϭϰƐƉĞĐŝĂůͲƐƚĂƚƵƐƉůĂŶƚƐƉĞĐŝĞƐ͘ tŚŝůĞŶŽƐĞŶƐŝƚŝǀĞƉůĂŶƚƐƉĞĐŝĞƐĂƌĞĞǆƉĞĐƚĞĚƚŽŽĐĐƵƌǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ^͖ŝƚŝƐƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƵƌƉŽƐĞƐ ŽĨ
YƚŚĂƚĂƐƉƌŝŶŐĨŽĐƵƐĞĚďŽƚĂŶŝĐĂůƐƵƌǀĞǇďĞĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞƚŚĞƉƌĞƐĞŶĐĞͬĂďƐĞŶĐĞ ĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƐĞŶƐŝƚŝǀĞƐƉĞĐŝĞƐ͘^ŚŽƵůĚĂĨŽĐƵƐĞĚƐĞŶƐŝƚŝǀĞďŽƚĂŶŝĐĂůƐƵƌǀĞǇŶŽƚďĞĨĞĂƐŝďůĞƉƌŝŽƌƚŽ
Y͕ĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐƐŚŽƵůĚďĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚƚŚĂƚ ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐƚŽĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĂĨŽĐƵƐĞĚďŽƚĂŶŝĐĂůƐƵƌǀĞǇĂƚĂůĂƚĞƌĚĂƚĞĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐ ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐƚŽŵŝƚŝŐĂƚŝŽŶƚŚĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐŚŽƵůĚŽŶĞďĞŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚ͕ƚŚĂƚĐĂŶŶŽƚďĞĂǀŽŝĚĞĚ͘ tŝůĚůŝĨĞŽĨŽŶĐĞƌŶ
dŚĞh^&t^͕EƐƉĞĐŝĞƐůŝƐƚƐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞϮϰƐƉĞĐŝĂůͲƐƚĂƚƵƐǁŝůĚůŝĨĞƚĂǆĂ;ĨĞĚĞƌĂůůǇůŝƐƚĞĚĂŶĚͬŽƌƐƚĂƚĞůŝƐƚĞĚͿ ĂƐŽĐĐƵƌƌŝŶŐǁŝƚŚŝŶĂϱͲŵŝůĞƌĂĚŝƵƐŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞ͘dŚŝƐůŝƐƚŽĨƐƉĞĐŝĞƐŝƐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚƌĞŐŝŽŶĂů͖ƚŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ ĂŶĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐŽĨƚŚĞƌĂŶŐĞĂŶĚŚĂďŝƚĂƚƉƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƐǁĂƐĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚƚŽŝĚĞŶƚŝĨǇǁŚŝĐŚƐƉĞĐŝĂůͲƐƚĂƚƵƐǁŝůĚůŝĨĞ ƐƉĞĐŝĞƐŚĂǀĞƚŚĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůƚŽŽĐĐƵƌǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ^͘dŚŝƐůŝƐƚŝƐŶŽƚŝŶƚĞŶĚĞĚƚŽďĞŝŶĐůƵƐŝǀĞŽĨĂůůŶĞƐƚŝŶŐ ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ

ŵŝŐƌĂƚŽƌǇƐƉĞĐŝĞƐƚŚĂƚŵĂǇŽĐĐƵƌŝŶƚŚĞĂƌĞĂ͕ƐŝŶĐĞŶƵŵĞƌŽƵƐƐƉĞĐŝĞƐŽĨďŝƌĚƐǁŝƚŚƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůĨŽƌ ŽĐĐƵƌƌĞŶĐĞŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƉƌŽƚĞĐƚĞĚďǇƚŚĞDdĂŶĚ&'ŽĚĞ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶƐϯϱϬϯĂŶĚϯϱϬϯ͘ϱ͘ /ƚŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƉĞƌŵŝƚƐĂŶĚĂƉƉƌŽǀĂůƐĨƌŽŵ&tĂŶĚZtYǁŽƵůĚŶŽƚĂůůŽǁĨŽƌ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚŽǀĞƌ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞƌĂŝŶǇƐĞĂƐŽŶ;KĐƚŽďĞƌϭϲƚŽDĂǇ ϯϭͿ͖ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ƐŚŽƵůĚƚŚĞƌĞďĞĂƐŝŐŶŝĨŝĐĂŶƚƌĂŝŶǇƐĞĂƐŽŶǁŚŝĐŚƌĞƐƵůƚƐŝŶǁĂƚĞƌďĞŝŶŐƉƌĞƐĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ ĐŚĂŶŶĞůĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞŵŽŶƚŚƐŽĨ:ƵŶĞϭƚŽKĐƚŽďĞƌϭϱ͕ƚŚĞƌĞŝƐĂƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůĨŽƌ^ŽƵƚŚĞƌŶĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂƐƚĞĞůŚĞĂĚ ŽƌƚŝĚĞǁĂƚĞƌŐŽďǇƚŽŽĐĐƵƌǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞĐŚĂŶŶĞů͘tŚŝůĞƚŚŝƐŝƐƵŶůŝŬĞůǇ͕ƚŚĞĂǀŽŝĚĂŶĐĞŽĨĂŶǇĂĐƚŝǀŝƚǇďĞůŽǁ ƚŚĞKƌĚŝŶĂƌǇ,ŝŐŚͲtĂƚĞƌDĂƌŬŽƌĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞďĂŶŬƐŽĨƚŚĞĐŚĂŶŶĞůǁŽƵůĚƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶŶŽĞĨĨĞĐƚƚŽƚŚĞƐĞĂƋƵĂƚŝĐ ƐƉĞĐŝĞƐ͘&ŝŶĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƉůĂŶƐǁŽƵůĚŚĂǀĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞŵĞĂƐƵƌĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚƚŽĨƵƌƚŚĞƌƌĞĚƵĐĞƚŚĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůĨŽƌ ĂŶǇŝŶĂĚǀĞƌƚĞŶƚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐĨƌŽŵĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ƉŝĞƌƐ͕ŽƌĂďƵƚŵĞŶƚƐ͘ EĞƐƚŝŶŐďŝƌĚƐĂƌĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ͕ĂŶĚĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞůĂŶĚƐĐĂƉĞĚƚƌĞĞƐƉůĂŶƚĞĚďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞ ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂŽŽĂŶĚhWZZ͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŽƵůĚƌĞŵŽǀĞǀĞŐĞƚĂƚŝŽŶĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚƚŽ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘/ƚŝƐƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƌĞŵŽǀĂůŽĨƚŚŝƐǀĞŐĞƚĂƚŝŽŶŽĐĐƵƌŽƵƚƐŝĚĞŽĨ ƚŚĞƚǇƉŝĐĂůŶĞƐƚŝŶŐƐĞĂƐŽŶǁŚŝĐŚŝƐƌĞĐŽŐŶŝǌĞĚĂƐ&ĞďƌƵĂƌǇϭƚŽ^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌϭ͘ZĞŵŽǀĂůŽƵƚƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞ ƚǇƉŝĐĂůŶĞƐƚŝŶŐƐĞĂƐŽŶǁŝůůƌĞĚƵĐĞƚŚĞƉƌŽďĂďŝůŝƚǇŽĨĂŶǇŶĞƐƚŝŶŐŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͘,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ŝƚŝƐƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚƚŚĂƚ ĞǀĞŶƚƌĞĞƌĞŵŽǀĂůŽƵƚƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞŶĞƐƚŝŶŐƐĞĂƐŽŶƐŚŽƵůĚďĞƐƵƌǀĞǇĞĚďǇĂƋƵĂůŝĨŝĞĚďŝŽůŽŐŝƐƚƉƌŝŽƌƚŽ ƌĞŵŽǀĂůƚŽĞŶƐƵƌĞŶŽůĂƚĞ͕ŽƌĞĂƌůǇ͕ŶĞƐƚŝŶŐĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐĂƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚ͘ >ĂƐƚůǇ͕ďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞƌĞĐŽŶŶĂŝƐƐĂŶĐĞͲůĞǀĞůƐƵƌǀĞǇ͕ĞƵĐĂůǇƉƚƵƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ^ĚŽŶŽƚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƵĨĨŝĐŝĞŶƚ ĚĞŶƐŝƚǇƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŽǀĞƌǁŝŶƚĞƌŝŶŐŚĂďŝƚĂƚĨŽƌŵŽŶĂƌĐŚďƵƚƚĞƌĨůǇ͘dŚŝƐŽďƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶǁĂƐĨƵƌƚŚĞƌƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞĚďǇ ƚŚĞĂďƐĞŶĐĞŽĨĂŶǇŽǀĞƌǁŝŶƚĞƌŝŶŐŚĂďŝƚĂƚĚŽĐƵŵĞŶƚĞĚďǇƚŚĞyĞƌĐĞƐ^ŽĐŝĞƚǇ͕DĂƉŽĨKǀĞƌǁŝŶƚĞƌŝŶŐ^ŝƚĞƐ ;ǁǁǁ͘ǁĞƐƚĞƌŶŵŽŶĂƌĐŚĐŽƵŶƚ͘ŽƌŐͿ͘dŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ŝƚŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŚĞƌĞǁŽƵůĚďĞŶŽĞĨĨĞĐƚƚŽƚŚŝƐƐƉĞĐŝĞƐ͘ ƵůƚƵƌĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐZĞǀŝĞǁ
ZĞĐŽƌĚƐĨƌŽŵĂƐĞĂƌĐŚŽĨƚŚĞĞŶƚƌĂůŽĂƐƚ/ŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶĞŶƚĞƌ;/ͿŽĨƚŚĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐĂůZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ /ŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ^ǇƐƚĞŵ;,Z/^ͿŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚĂůůƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞĂŶĚƉƌŝŽƌƐƚƵĚǇƌĞĐŽƌĚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂƌĞĂ͘dŚĞ ƌĞĐŽƌĚƐƐĞĂƌĐŚƌĞǀĞĂůĞĚƚŚĂƚϮϭƉƌŝŽƌĐƵůƚƵƌĂůƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐƐƚƵĚŝĞƐŽǀĞƌůĂƉǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂƌĞĂ͘dŚĞƐĞ ŝŶĐůƵĚĞĂƌĐŚĂĞŽůŽŐŝĐĂů;ƐƵƌǀĞǇĂŶĚ
ǆƚĞŶĚĞĚWŚĂƐĞ/ͿĂŶĚŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐƚƵĚŝĞƐ͘ůƚŚŽƵŐŚŶŽŶĞ ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĞĚƚŚĞĞŶƚŝƌĞƚǇŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂƌĞĂ͕ƚŚĞĐŽŵďŝŶĞĚĐŽǀĞƌĂŐĞŽĨƚŚĞϮϭƐƚƵĚŝĞƐ ĞŶĐŽŵƉĂƐƐĞƐϭϬϬƉĞƌĐĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂƌĞĂ͘dŚĞƌĞĐŽƌĚƐƐĞĂƌĐŚƌĞǀĞĂůĞĚƚŚĂƚƉŽƌƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞƐŝƚĞĂƌĞ ŬŶŽǁŶƚŽŚĂǀĞĂƌĐŚĂĞŽůŽŐŝĐĂůƐĞŶƐŝƚŝǀŝƚǇ͘dŚĞŵŽƐƚƌĞĐĞŶƚƐƚƵĚŝĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƌĞĐŽƌĚƐƐĞĂƌĐŚǁĞƌĞ ĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚǀĂƌŝŽƵƐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐĂƚƚŚĞ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂŽŽůŽŐŝĐĂů'ĂƌĚĞŶƐ͘ /ĨĨĞĚĞƌĂůĨƵŶĚƐĂƌĞƵƚŝůŝǌĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͕ƚŚĞŶƚŚĞĨƵůůƐƵŝƚĞŽĨEĂƚŝŽŶĂů,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐWƌĞƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶĐƚ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶ ϭϬϲĐƵůƚƵƌĂůƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐƐƚƵĚŝĞƐǁŽƵůĚďĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůŽƌƐƵƉƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂůƐƚƵĚŝĞƐŵĂǇ ďĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĚƵĞƚŽƚŚĞŝƚǇ͛ƐƌĞǀŝĞǁŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂƐŝƚƌĞůĂƚĞƐƚŽƚŚĞŝƌŽďůŝŐĂƚŝŽŶƐƵŶĚĞƌƚŚĞĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ

ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůYƵĂůŝƚǇĐƚ͘&ŽƌƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƉƵƌƉŽƐĞƐ͕Ă,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐWƌŽƉĞƌƚǇ^ƵƌǀĞǇZĞƉŽƌƚ;,W^ZͿ͕ ƌĐŚĂĞŽůŽŐŝĐĂů^ƵƌǀĞǇZĞƉŽƌƚ;^ZͿ͕ĂŶĚ,ŝƐƚŽƌŝĐZĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ ǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶZĞƉŽƌƚ;,Z
ZͿƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůƐƚƵĚŝĞƐĂƌĞ
ĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŽďĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͘
ǆƚĞŶĚĞĚWŚĂƐĞ/ƐƚƵĚǇŝƐƉŽƐƐŝďůĞŐŝǀĞŶƚŚĞŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůǇŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚ ĐƵůƚƵƌĂůƌĞƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͕ďƵƚƵŶůŝŬĞůǇŐŝǀĞŶƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂƌĞĂŝƐůĂƌŐĞůǇǁŝƚŚŝŶƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůǇĚŝƐƚƵƌďĞĚĂŶĚ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚĂƌĞĂƐ͘
,ĂǌĂƌĚŽƵƐDĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐ
Ŷ/ŶŝƚŝĂů^ŝƚĞƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚƐŚŽƵůĚďĞĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚƚŽĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞŝĨĂŶǇZĞĐŽŐŶŝǌĞĚ ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ
;Z
ͿǁĞƌĞŽďƐĞƌǀĞĚĂƚͬŶĞĂƌƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞ͘dƌĞĂƚĞĚǁŽŽĚǁĂƐƚĞ͕ŶĂƚƵƌĂůůǇŽĐĐƵƌƌŝŶŐĂƐďĞƐƚŽƐ͕ĂĞƌŝĂů ĚĞƉŽƐŝƚĞĚůĞĂĚ͕ĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌůĞĂĚďĂƐĞĚƉĂŝŶƚƐĂƌĞĐŽŵŵŽŶƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůZ ƚŚĂƚŵĂǇĞǆŝƐƚĂƚƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͘
ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
Z/'
Z/>/E'
ƌŝĚŐĞƌĂŝůŝŶŐĐĂŶďĞƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚĨŽƌĞŝƚŚĞƌĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂů͕
ĐŽƐƚ͕ŽƌĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘dŚĞƌĂŝůŝŶŐǁŝůů
ŶĞĞĚƚŽŵĞĞƚŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŚĞŝŐŚƚĂŶĚŽƉĞŶŝŶŐ
ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ďƵƚƚŚĞƚǇƉĞĂŶĚƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶ
ƐŚŽƵůĚďĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚǁŝƚŚƌĞƐƉĞĐƚƚŽƚŚĞŝƚǇĂŶĚ
ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇƉƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƐ͘
^ƚĂƚĞůĂǁǁŝůůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂƌĂŝůŝŶŐĂƚůĞĂƐƚϰϮ͟ƚĂůůǁŝƚŚĂ ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽƉĞŶŝŶŐƐŝǌĞĚƐƵĐŚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƌĂŝůǁŽƵůĚŶŽƚ
ƉĂƐƐĂϲ͟ƐƉŚĞƌĞ͘^,dKϮϬϭϮŐƵŝĚĞĨŽƌƚŚĞ
ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨŝĐǇĐůĞ&ĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐ;ϰƚŚĞĚŝƚŝŽŶͿĂůƐŽ
ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĂϰϴ͟ƚĂůůƌĂŝůŝŶŐƚŽ
ƉƌĞǀĞŶƚĐǇĐůŝƐƚĨƌŽŵĨĂůůŝŶŐŽǀĞƌƚŚĞƌĂŝůĚƵƌŝŶŐĂĐƌĂƐŚ͘ ƐŵŽŽƚŚǁŝĚĞƌƵďƌĂŝůŝƐĂůƐŽƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚĂƚĂŚĞŝŐŚƚ ďĞƚǁĞĞŶϯϲ͟ĂŶĚϰϰ͟ƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞƚŚĞůŝŬĞůŝŚŽŽĚƚŚĂƚĂ
ďŝĐǇĐůŝƐƚ͛ƐŚĂŶĚůĞďĂƌǁŝůůďĞĐĂƵŐŚƚďǇƚŚĞƌĂŝůŝŶŐ͘
dŚĞƌĂŝůŵĞƐŚŽƌƉŝĐŬĞƚƐƐŚŽƵůĚĂůƐŽďĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŽďĞĐůŝŵďƌĞƐŝƐƚĂŶƚ͘hWZZǁŝůůĂůƐŽŚĂǀĞŵŽƌĞƐƚƌŝŶŐĞŶƚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐŽǀĞƌƚŚĞŝƌƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ͘hWZZƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵϭ͛ƚĂůůƐŽůŝĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƉĂƌĂƉĞƚǁŝƚŚĂƌĂŝů ƚŚĂƚŝƐĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨϴ͛ƚĂůůǁŝƚŚĂĐƵƌǀĞĚƚŽƉƚŽƌĞƐŝƐƚĐůŝŵďŝŶŐĂŶĚƚŚĞĂďŝůŝƚǇƚŽƚŚƌŽǁŽďũĞĐƚƐŽŶƚŽƚŚĞ ƌĂŝůǁĂǇ͘hWZZǁŽƵůĚĂůƐŽĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůƌĂŝůƚŚĂƚŝƐŶŽƚĐƵƌǀĞĚďƵƚƚŚĂƚƌĂŝůŵƵƐƚďĞĂŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨϭϬ͛ ƚĂůů͘dŚĞƌĂŝůŝƐĂŐŽŽĚƉůĂĐĞƚŽŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͘/ĨĂƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚƌƵƐƐŝƐƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚĂƐƚŚĞ ƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞ͕ƉŝĐŬĞƚƐŽƌŵĞƐŚĐĂŶďĞĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞŝŶƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞƚƌƵƐƐŝƚƐĞůĨ͘ ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ

^d,
d/Z
Yh/Z
D
Ed^
dŚĞĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐŽĨĂŶŽǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐŽǀĞƌh^ϭϬϭĂŶĚhWZZĂƌĞĂƉƌŝŵĂƌǇĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶ͕ďƵƚĨƵŶĐƚŝŽŶĂůŝƚǇ ĂŶĚĐŽƐƚǁŝůůĂůƐŽďĞĂƉƌŝŽƌŝƚǇƚŽŚĞůƉďĞƐƚƐĞƌǀĞƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇ͘dŚĞƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞǁŝůů ŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐƚŽƚŝĞƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶŝŶƚŽƚŚĞŶĂƚƵƌĂůďĞĂƵƚǇŽĨ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂ͘dŚĞ ĚĞƐŝŐŶdĞĂŵŚĂƐĂůƌĞĂĚǇƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚƌĞŶĚĞƌŝŶŐƐĨŽƌƚŚĞŝƚǇƚŽƌĞǀŝĞǁǁŚŝĐŚĐĂŶďĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚĂƚƉƵďůŝĐ ŵĞĞƚŝŶŐƐ͘dŚŝƐĂůůŽǁƐƚŚĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇƚŽǀŝƐƵĂůŝǌĞƚŚĞŽǀĞƌĂůůƉƌŽũĞĐƚĂŶĚĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐ͘ ƌƚŝƐƚŝĐĐƵƐƚŽŵƉĂŶĞůƉĂƚƚĞƌŶƐĂƌĞĨĞĂƐŝďůĞŽŶƚŚĞĨĞŶĐŝŶŐ͕ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌŝŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽŵĞĞƚƵŶŝŽŶƉĂĐŝĨŝĐ ƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͕ƚŚĞďĂĐŬƐŝĚĞǁŽƵůĚŶĞĞĚƚŽďĞĐŽǀĞƌĞĚǁŝƚŚĂŵĞƚĂůŽƌĐŽĂƚĞĚŵĞƚĂůŵĞƐŚƚŚĂƚĚŽĞƐ ŶŽƚĂůůŽǁĨŽƌĂŶŽƉĞŶŝŶŐŐƌĞĂƚĞƌƚŚĂŶϮ͘͟/ƚ͛ƐĂůƐŽŝŵƉŽƌƚĂŶƚƚŽŶŽƚĞƚŚĂƚƚƌƵƐƐŵĞŵďĞƌƐůŝŬĞƚŚĞŽŶĞ ƐŚŽǁŶďĞůŽǁǁŽƵůĚďĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚƐŽĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƐŵƵƐƚĂůƐŽĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƐĞŵĞŵďĞƌƐ͘ dǇƉŝĐĂůůǇ͕ŵĞƐŚŽƌĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐƉĂŶĞůƐĂƌĞŵŽƵŶƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞŝŶƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞƚƌƵƐƐŵĞŵďĞƌƐ͘ ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
^dKZDtd
ZYh>/dz
dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůĐƌĞĂƚĞŶĞǁŝŵƉĞƌǀŝŽƵƐƐƵƌĨĂĐĞƐ͘dŚŝƐǁŝůůƉƌŝŵĂƌŝůǇďĞƚŚĞůŝŵŝƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞŶĞǁĞůĞǀĂƚĞĚ ďƌŝĚŐĞĚĞĐŬŝƚƐĞůĨ͘tŚŝůĞƚŚŝƐĂƌĞĂǁŝůůďĞƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞůǇƐŵĂůů;ĂŶĚůŽĐĂƚĞĚƉƌŝŵĂƌŝůǇĂďŽǀĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŝŵƉĞƌŵĞĂďůĞƐƵƌĨĂĐĞƐƚŚĞƌĞďǇƌĞĚƵĐŝŶŐƐƵƌĨĂĐĞǁĂƚĞƌŽŶƚŚĞƉĂƌĐĞůƐďĞůŽǁͿ͕ƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůƐƚŝůůďĞ ƐƵďũĞĐƚƚŽƚŚĞŝƚǇ͛ƐƉŽƐƚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐĂƐŽƵƚůŝŶĞĚŝŶƚŚĞ^ƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌDW dĞĐŚŶŝĐĂů'ƵŝĚĂŶĐĞDĂŶƵĂů;ĂƚĞĚϮϬϮϬͿ͘
/ŶŐĞŶĞƌĂů͕ƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůďĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŵŝŶŝŵƵŵĨŽŽƚƉƌŝŶƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƚŽŵĞĞƚƚŚĞŐŽĂůƐŽĨƚŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͕ǁŚĞƌĞƉŽƐƐŝďůĞ͕ŶĂƚƵƌĂůĂƌĞĂƐĂŶĚĨůŽǁƉĂƚŚƐǁŝůůďĞŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶĞĚŽƌƌĞƐƚŽƌĞĚ͕ĂŶĚƐŽŝů ĚŝƐƚƵƌďĂŶĐĞĂŶĚĐŽŵƉĂĐƚŝŽŶǁŝůůďĞůŝŵŝƚĞĚƚŽĂƌĞĂƐǁŚĞƌĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐĂƌĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ͘ dŚĞŚŝŐŚƉŽŝŶƚŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƉƌŽĨŝůĞŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚũƵƐƚƐŽƵƚŚŽĨƚŚĞhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ;ĂƉƉƌŽǆ͘^ƚĂƚŝŽŶϭϵнϲϬͿ͘ dŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌǁŽƵůĚĨůŽǁƐŽƵƚŚǁĞƐƚƚŽǁĂƌĚDƵƌƉŚǇ&ŝĞůĚ;ŶĞǁŝŵƉĞƌǀŝŽƵƐƐƵƌĨĂĐĞĂƉƉƌŽǆ͘ϵ͕ϯϬϬ ƐƋĨƚͿĂŶĚƚŽƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚƚŽǁĂƌĚƚŚĞƐƚĂĐŬĞĚƌĂŵƉƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ;ŶĞǁŝŵƉĞƌǀŝŽƵƐƐƵƌĨĂĐĞĂƉƉƌŽǆ͘ϭϭ͕ϬϬϬƐƋĨƚͿ ĨƌŽŵƚŚĂƚŚŝŐŚƉŽŝŶƚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞƚŽƚĂůŶĞǁŝŵƉĞƌǀŝŽƵƐƐƵƌĨĂĐĞŽŶƚŚĞĞŶƚŝƌĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŽďĞ ůĞƐƐƚŚĂŶϬ͘ϱĂĐƌĞƐ͘
ƌĂŝŶĂŐĞŽƌƚƌĞĂƚŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚŝŶĂůƚƌĂŶƐŽƌhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇǁŝůůŶŽƚďĞĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ͘dŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶdĞĂŵŚĂƐ ŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚƚǁŽƉŽƐƐŝďůĞŝƚǇŽǁŶĞĚƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇĂƌĞĂƐǁŝƚŚĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞƌŽŽŵǁŚĞƌĞƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌƚƌĞĂƚŵĞŶƚ ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞĐŽƵůĚŽĐĐƵƌ;ƐĞĞŚŝŐŚůŝŐŚƚĞĚŝŶǇĞůůŽǁďĞůŽǁͿ͘tĂƚĞƌĐŽƵůĚƌƵŶĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞďƌŝĚŐĞĚĞĐŬĐƵƌďŽƌďĞ ĐŽůůĞĐƚĞĚǁŝƚŚĚĞĐŬĚƌĂŝŶƐĂŶĚƉŝƉĞĚũƵƐƚǁĞƐƚŽĨ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬƐŽƵƚŚŽĨĂďƵƚŵĞŶƚϭ͘dŽƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚǁĂƚĞƌ ĐŽƵůĚďĞƉŝƉĞĚƚŽǁĂƌĚƚŚĞƐƚĂĐŬĞĚƌĂŵƉƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂŶĚƚŚĞŶĚŽǁŶĂĐŽůƵŵŶƚŽďĞƚƌĞĂƚĞĚũƵƐƚǁĞƐƚŽĨƚŚĞ ^ƵŶƌŝƐĞZsWĂƌŬ͘ĨƚĞƌƚƌĞĂƚŵĞŶƚ͕ƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌĐŽƵůĚďĞĚŝƐĐŚĂƌŐĞĚŝŶƚŽƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐƚŽƌŵĚƌĂŝŶƚŽƚŚĞ ŶŽƌƚŚŽƌ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬƚŽƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚ͘
dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƐƚŽƌŵǁĂƚĞƌďĂƐŝŶůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐŚŽǁŶŽŶƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚĚŽĞƐŚĂǀĞƚŚĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůƚŽĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚǁŝƚŚ ĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƵŶĚĞƌŐƌŽƵŶĚƵƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘dŚŝƐĂƌĞĂŵĂǇĂůƐŽďĞŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇĨŽƌƚƌƵĐŬƐƚŽĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƌĞĐůĂŝŵĞĚ ǁĂƚĞƌǀĂůǀĞƐĂƚƚŚŝƐůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞƐĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚƐǁŝůůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĨƵƌƚŚĞƌĞǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶĚƵƌŝŶŐĨŝŶĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶ͘ ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
'
Kd
,E/>ͬ&KhEd/KE^
zĞŚĂŶĚƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞƐ/ŶĐ͘;zĞŚͿĂŶĂůǇǌĞĚƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐĨŝĞůĚĞǆƉůŽƌĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚďǇĂůƚƌĂŶƐŝŶƚŚĞ ǀŝĐŝŶŝƚǇŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞĨŽƌƚŚĞƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞh^ϭϬϭ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬƌŝĚŐĞ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶŽĨƚŚĞ ĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐ^ŽƵŶĚǁĂůůƐEŽ͘ϭĂŶĚEŽ͘ϮƚŚĂƚƌƵŶĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚďŽƵŶĚůĂŶĞŽĨh^ϭϬϭ͘ WƌĞǀŝŽƵƐĞǆƉůŽƌĂƚŝŽŶƐďǇĂůƚƌĂŶƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗ϰϯ͘ϱ͛ďŽƌŝŶŐĂƚ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬƌŝĚŐĞƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚŝŶϭϵϰϰ͕;ϰͿ Ϯϰ͘ϱ͛ͲϮϲ͘Ϭ͛ĚĞĞƉĂƵŐĞƌďŽƌŝŶŐƐƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚŝŶϮϬϬϰĨŽƌ^ŽƵŶĚǁĂůůƐEŽ͘ϭĂŶĚEŽ͘Ϯ͕ĂŶĚ;ϰͿϴϮ͘ϱ͛ʹϵϬ͛ĚĞĞƉ ŵƵĚƌŽƚĂƌǇďŽƌŝŶŐƐƉĞƌĨŽƌŵĞĚďǇĂůƚƌĂŶƐŝŶϮϬϬϱĨŽƌƚŚĞƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬƌŝĚŐĞ͘ 'ĞŽƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐ
dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞdƌĂŶƐǀĞƌƐĞZĂŶŐĞƐŐĞŽŵŽƌƉŚŝĐƉƌŽǀŝŶĐĞĂŶĚůŝĞƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĂŶĂůůƵǀŝĂů ƉůĂŶĞďŽƌĚĞƌĞĚďǇƚŚĞ^ĂŶƚĂzŶĞǌDŽƵŶƚĂŝŶƐƚŽƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞWĂĐŝĨŝĐKĐĞĂŶƚŽƚŚĞƐŽƵƚŚ͘dŚĞ ƚŽƉŽŐƌĂƉŚǇŝŶƚŚĞƐŝƚĞǀŝĐŝŶŝƚǇŝƐƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞůǇĨůĂƚǁŝƚŚĂŐƌĂĚĞƚǇƉŝĐĂůůǇďĞƚǁĞĞŶϬйĂŶĚϯй͘dŚĞĨůĂƚƐƵƌĨĂĐĞŝƐ ŐĞŶĞƌĂůůǇƵŶĚĞƌůĂŝŶďǇƵŶŝƚƐŽĨĂůůƵǀŝƵŵĂŶĚĐŽůůƵǀŝƵŵ͕ŝŶƚĞƌŵĞĚŝĂƚĞĂůůƵǀŝĂůĚĞƉŽƐŝƚƐ͕ĂŶĚŽůĚĞƌĂůůƵǀŝƵŵ͘ 'ƌŽƵŶĚǁĂƚĞƌ
'ƌŽƵŶĚǁĂƚĞƌůĞǀĞůƐĂŶĚƐŽŝůŵŽŝƐƚƵƌĞĐŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶƐǁŝůůǀĂƌǇƐĞĂƐŽŶĂůůǇĂŶĚŝŶĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚĐŚĂŶŐĞƐŝŶ ƉƌĞĐŝƉŝƚĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƌƵŶŽĨĨ͕ŝƌƌŝŐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƉƵŵƉŝŶŐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĨĂĐƚŽƌƐ͘'ƌŽƵŶĚǁĂƚĞƌĚĂƚĂŝƐďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞďŽƌŝŶŐƐ ĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚŝŶDĂǇϮϬϬϰĂŶĚŚĂĚĂĚĞƉƚŚƚŽŐƌŽƵŶĚǁĂƚĞƌĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŐƌŽƵŶĚƐƵƌĨĂĐĞĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶďĞƚǁĞĞŶϲ͘ϯ ĨĞĞƚĂŶĚϭϯ͘ϬĨĞĞƚ͘/ƚƐŚŽƵůĚďĞŶŽƚĞĚƚŚĂƚϯŽƵƚŽĨϴďŽƌŝŶŐƐĚŝĚŶŽƚĞŶĐŽƵŶƚĞƌŐƌŽƵŶĚǁĂƚĞƌ͘dŚĞƐĞ ďŽƌŝŶŐƐǁĞƌĞǁŝƚŚƌĞŐĂƌĚƐƚŽƚŚĞh^ϭϬϭďƌŝĚŐĞƌĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚƐŽƵŶĚǁĂůůƐ͕ƐŽĂƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚǀŝĐŝŶŝƚǇ͕ďƵƚŶŽƚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůůŝŵŝƚƐ͘ƵĞƚŽƚŚŝƐ͕ŐƌŽƵŶĚǁĂƚĞƌǀĂƌŝĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ƐŝƚĞƐŚŽƵůĚďĞĞǆƉĞĐƚĞĚ͘
ŽƌƌŽƐŝŽŶ
EŝŶĞƐŽŝůƐĂŵƉůĞƐĂŶĚŽŶĞǁĂƚĞƌƐĂŵƉůĞǁĞƌĞƚĂŬĞŶĨŽƌĐŽƌƌŽƐŝŽŶƚĞƐƚŝŶŐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞĂůƚƌĂŶƐďŽƌŝŶŐƐĨŽƌƚŚĞ h^ϭϬϭ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬƌŝĚŐĞZĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚ͘ZĞƐƵůƚƐĨŽƌƉ,͕ƌĞƐŝƐƚŝǀŝƚǇ͕ƐƵůĨĂƚĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĐŚůŽƌŝĚĞƐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞĚ ƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƐŽŝůƐĂƌĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚŶŽŶͲĐŽƌƌŽƐŝǀĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶĂůƚƌĂŶƐƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƐ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽƐŽŝů͕ƚŚĞĂŝƌĂůƐŽŚĂƐ ƚŚĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůƚŽďĞĐŽƌƌŽƐŝǀĞĚƵĞƚŽƚŚĞŵĂƌŝŶĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚ͘ĂůƚƌĂŶƐĚĞĨŝŶĞƐĂŵĂƌŝŶĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂƐĂ ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶϭϬϬϬĨĞĞƚŽĨƚŚĞŽĐĞĂŶŽƌƚŝĚĂůǁĂƚĞƌƐ͘dŚŝƐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇ ϭϯϬϬĨĞĞƚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŽĐĞĂŶŵĂŬŝŶŐŝƚǀĞƌǇĐůŽƐĞďƵƚũƵƐƚŽƵƚƐŝĚĞƚŚĞŵĂƌŝŶĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚǌŽŶĞ͘dŚŝƐŵĞĂŶƐ ƚŚĂƚƐƉĞĐŝĂůĐŽƌƌŽƐŝŽŶĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐƐƵĐŚĂƐŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞĐŽǀĞƌ͕ĞƉŽǆǇĐŽĂƚĞĚƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
ƉŽůǇĞƐƚĞƌĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞĚĞĐŬŽǀĞƌůĂǇĂŶĚĚĞƐŝŐŶŽĨƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚĂƌĞĚƵĐĞĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞĞǆƉŽƐƵƌĞĨĂĐƚŽƌĂƌĞ ŶŽƚĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞƚŽƚŚŝƐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘dŚĞĐŽĚĞĚŽĞƐĂůůŽǁĨŽƌƐŽŵĞĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐũƵĚŐĞŵĞŶƚƚŽŝŶĐŽƌƉŽƌĂƚĞ ƐŽŵĞŽĨƚŚĞƐĞĨĞĂƚƵƌĞƐŝĨĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐĂƌĞŚĂǀŝŶŐĐŽƌƌŽƐŝŽŶŝƐƐƵĞƐ͘ WƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌǇ&ŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ
&ŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐƐƚƵĚŝĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚƐƉƌĞĂĚĨŽŽƚŝŶŐƐ͕ĚƌŝǀĞŶƉŝůĞƐ͕ĐĂƐƚͲŝŶͲ ƐƚĞĞůͲƐŚĞůů;/^^ͿƉŝůĞƐ͕ĂŶĚĐĂƐƚͲŝŶͲĚƌŝůůĞĚͲŚŽůĞ;/,ͿƉŝůĞƐ͘sĂƌŝŽƵƐĨĂĐƚŽƌƐĂƌĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚŝŶƚŚĞƚǇƉĞͲ ƐĞůĞĐƚŝŽŶŽĨĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͘dŚĞƐĞĨĂĐƚŽƌƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞ͗ • ZĞůĂƚŝǀĞůǇƐŚĂůůŽǁŐƌŽƵŶĚǁĂƚĞƌĂŶĚĂůůƵǀŝƵŵĐŽŵƉŽƐĞĚŽĨŝŶƚĞƌďĞĚĚĞĚůĂǇĞƌƐŽĨůŽŽƐĞƚŽŵĞĚŝƵŵ ĚĞŶƐĞƐĂŶĚĂŶĚǀĞƌǇƐŽĨƚƚŽƐƚŝĨĨƐŝůƚĂŶĚĐůĂǇ͘
• WŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůůǇůŝƋƵĞĨŝĂďůĞůĂǇĞƌƐŽĨƐĂŶĚƵŶĚĞƌƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĂƌƚŚƋƵĂŬĞ͘ • ^ĐŽƵƌƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůĂƚ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬǁŝůůŶĞĞĚƚŽďĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚĨŽƌĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐ͘ • ^ƉĂĐĞĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐĚƵĞƚŽĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ͕ŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƉĂĐĞƐ͕^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬĨƵƚƵƌĞ ĐŚĂŶŶĞůŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ĂůƚƌĂŶƐƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐŽƵŶĚǁĂůůƐ͘ • KǀĞƌŚĞĂĚĂŶĚƵŶĚĞƌŐƌŽƵŶĚƵƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐ͘
• ^ŽŝůĂŶĚŐƌŽƵŶĚǁĂƚĞƌŚĂǀĞƚŚĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůƚŽďĞĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚĞĚĚƵĞƚŽƉƌŽǆŝŵŝƚǇƚŽƌĂŝůƌŽĂĚĐŽƌƌŝĚŽƌ͘ ^ƉƌĞĂĚĨŽŽƚŝŶŐƐǁĞƌĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚĂŶĚǁŽƵůĚůŝŬĞůǇďĞĂƌǁŝƚŚŝŶϱƚŽϴĨĞĞƚŽĨĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐŝƚĞŐƌĂĚĞƐ͘ĞƐŝŐŶŽĨ ƐƉƌĞĂĚĨŽŽƚŝŶŐƐǁŽƵůĚĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌďĞĂƌŝŶŐƌĞƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ͕ƐĞƚƚůĞŵĞŶƚ͕ƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůƐĐŽƵƌ͕ĨŽŽƚƉƌŝŶƚĐŽŶĨůŝĐƚƐ͕ĂŶĚ ƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůůŝƋƵĞĨĂĐƚŝŽŶ͘ůƚŚŽƵŐŚĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ͕ƐƉƌĞĂĚĨŽŽƚŝŶŐƐǁĞƌĞŶŽƚĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚƚŽďĞƚŚĞƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚŽƉƚŝŽŶ͘ dŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶǁŽƵůĚďĞƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞůǇĐŽŵƉůĞǆĂŶĚŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐƌŝƐŬƐĨŽƌƵŶĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚĐŽƐƚƐ ĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĐŽŵƉƌĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚǇĂŶĚůŝƋƵĞĨĂĐƚŝŽŶƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůŽĨƚŚĞƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐŽŝů͘dŚĞďŝŐŐĞƐƚ ĚŝƐĂĚǀĂŶƚĂŐĞŝƐƚŚĞƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞůǇůĂƌŐĞĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶĨŽŽƚƉƌŝŶƚǁŚŝĐŚǁŽƵůĚŚĂǀĞƚŚĞŵŽƐƚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚŝŶĨƌĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘
ƌŝǀĞŶƉŝůĞƐǁŽƵůĚƚǇƉŝĐĂůůǇĐŽŶƐŝƐƚŽĨĂůƚƌĂŶƐƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƉůĂŶƐƚĞĞůƉŝƉĞ͕ƐƋƵĂƌĞƉƌĞĐĂƐƚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƉŝůĞƐ͕Žƌ ƐƚĞĞů,ͲƉŝůĞƐ͘ůĂƐƐϰϬϬĚƌŝǀĞŶĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƉŝůĞƐǁĞƌĞƵƐĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŽĨƐŽƵŶĚǁĂůůEŽ͘ϭĂƐǁĞůůĂƐƚŚĞ ǁŝŶŐǁĂůůƐĨŽƌ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬďƌŝĚŐĞ͘ƉŝůĞĨŽŽƚŝŶŐĐĂƉǁŽƵůĚďĞĂďůĞƚŽďĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚĂƚŽƌĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞ ŐƌŽƵŶĚǁĂƚĞƌůĞǀĞů͕ƉŽƐƐŝďůǇƉƌĞƐĞŶƚŝŶŐĨĞǁĞƌĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĐŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐƚŚĂŶĂĚƌŝůůĞĚĚĞĞƉĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ ŽƉƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞǇǁŽƵůĚŶ͛ƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐůƵƌƌǇŽƌĐƵƚƚŝŶŐĚŝƐƉŽƐĂůĂŶĚĐŽƵůĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉƐĐŽƵƌĂŶĚůŝƋƵĞĨĂĐƚŝŽŶ ƌĞƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞ͘dŚĞǇǁŝůůŚŽǁĞǀĞƌƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂůĂƌŐĞƌĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĨŽŽƚƉƌŝŶƚƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞƚŽ/,ƉŝůĞƐĂŶĚǁŝůů ŐĞŶĞƌĂƚĞƉŝůĞĚƌŝǀŝŶŐŶŽŝƐĞĚƵƌŝŶŐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘&ŽƌĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůƉƵƌƉŽƐĞƐ͕ĚƌŝǀŝŶŐŵĂǇŶŽƚďĞƉĞƌŵŝƚƚĞĚ ĐůŽƐĞƚŽ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬĚƵĞƚŽƐĞŶƐŝƚŝǀĞĂƋƵĂƚŝĐůŝĨĞ͘ /^^ƉŝůĞƐǁŽƵůĚĐŽŶƐŝƐƚŽĨĚƌŝǀŝŶŐĂƐƚĞĞůƉŝƉĞƉŝůĞŝŶƚŽƚŚĞŐƌŽƵŶĚĂŶĚĐĂƐƚŝŶŐƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞŝŶƚŽƚŚĞ ŚĞĂĚŽĨƚŚĞƉŝůĞƚŽĨŽƌŵĂƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĂůĐŽŶŶĞĐƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƐƵƉĞƌƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘dŚĞƐĞƉŝůĞƐĐĂŶďĞƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĞĚǁŝƚŚ ĂůĂƌŐĞƌĚŝĂŵĞƚĞƌƚŚĂƚĐĂŶŚĞůƉĚĞǀĞůŽƉƌĞƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞĂƚƐŚĂůůŽǁĞƌĚĞƉƚŚƐĐŽŵƉĂƌĞĚƚŽĚƌŝǀĞŶƉŝůĞƐ͘ ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůůǇ͕ƚŚĞǇĐĂŶŚĞůƉƌĞƐŝƐƚůĂƚĞƌĂůůŽĂĚƐ͕ĂůŽŶŐǁŝƚŚƐĐŽƵƌĂŶĚůŝƋƵĞĨĂĐƚŝŽŶƌĞůĂƚĞĚĞĨĨĞĐƚƐ͕ŝĨĨƵƌƚŚĞƌ ĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞƐƚŚĂƚƚŚŝƐŝƐŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇ͘dŚŝƐǁŽƵůĚ͕ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐŽŝůĚŝƐƉŽƐĂů͕ƉŝůĞĚƌŝǀŝŶŐǁŝƚŚ ĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚŶŽŝƐĞĂŶĚƵŶŬŶŽǁŶƐŶĞĂƌƚŚĞĐƌĞĞŬ͕ĚĞůĂǇƐŝĨƐƉůŝĐĞƐĂƌĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ͕ĂŶĚŵĂǇŶĞĞĚƚŽďĞŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚ ǁŝƚŚĂŐƌŽƵƉŽĨĚƌŝǀĞŶƉŝůĞƐƚŽŚĞůƉƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞůŽĂĚƐĂďŽǀĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƉŝůĞĐĂƉĂĐŝƚǇ͘/^^ƉŝůĞƐǁĞƌĞ ƵƐĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌĞǀŝŽƵƐůǇŝŶƐƚĂůůĞĚ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬƌŝĚŐĞŽŶh^ϭϬϭĂŶĚǁŽƵůĚŶĞĞĚƚŽĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů ĚŽǁŶĚƌĂŐĂŶĚƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůůĂƚĞƌĂůĨŽƌĐĞƐĂƐƐŽĐŝĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚƐĞŝƐŵŝĐƐĞƚƚůĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚůŝƋƵĞĨĂĐƚŝŽŶ͘ /,ƉŝůĞƐƚǇƉŝĐĂůůǇĐŽŶƐŝƐƚŽĨĂƌĞŝŶĨŽƌĐĞĚĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞƉŝůĞĐĂƐƚŝŶĂĚƌŝůůĞĚŚŽůĞ͘/,ƉŝůĞƐǁŽƵůĚŶĞĞĚƚŽ ĚĞǀĞůŽƉĨƌŝĐƚŝŽŶĂůƌĞƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŽůĚĞƌĂůůƵǀŝƵŵďĞůŽǁĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶͲϮϱĨĞĞƚ͘>ŽŽƐĞ͕ǁĞƚĂůůƵǀŝƵŵǁŽƵůĚ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞǁĞƚŝŶƐƚĂůůĂƚŝŽŶŵĞƚŚŽĚ;ƐůƵƌƌǇͲĚŝƐƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚͿĂŶĚͬŽƌĂƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇĐĂƐŝŶŐ͘/,ƉŝůĞƐĐĂŶďĞ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚǁŝƚŚůĂƌŐĞƌĚŝĂŵĞƚĞƌƐ͕ƌĞƋƵŝƌŝŶŐŽŶůǇĂƐŝŶŐůĞƉŝůĞƉĞƌƐƵƉƉŽƌƚ͘dŚĞǇǁŽƵůĚŶŽƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂƉŝůĞ ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
ĐĂƉ͕ǁŚŝĐŚŐƌĞĂƚůǇƌĞĚƵĐĞƐƚŚĞŽǀĞƌĂůůĨŽŽƚƉƌŝŶƚĂŶĚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽƚŚĞƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐĂƌĞĂ͘tŝƚŚŽƵƚƉŝůĞĚƌŝǀŝŶŐ ĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐ͕ŶŽŝƐĞůŝŵŝƚĂƚŝŽŶƐŶĞĂƌ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬĂŶĚƚŚĞƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐŶĞŝŐŚďŽƌŚŽŽĚƐǁŽƵůĚĂůƐŽŶŽƚďĞĂ ĐŽŶĐĞƌŶ͘dŚĞǇĐĂŶďĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƌĞƐŝƐƚĂŶĐĞƚŽƐĐŽƵƌĂŶĚůŝƋƵĞĨĂĐƚŝŽŶƌĞůĂƚĞĚĞĨĨĞĐƚƐ͕ŵĂŬŝŶŐ ƚŚĞŵǁĞůůƐƵŝƚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚŝƐƚǇƉĞŽĨĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘WŽƐƚͲĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŝŶƐƉĞĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŶŽŶĚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚŝǀĞƚĞƐƚŝŶŐ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƉĞƌƚŚĞǁĞƚͲƐƉĞĐŵĞƚŚŽĚĐŽƵůĚŝĚĞŶƚŝĨǇĂŶŽŵĂůŝĞƐĂŶĚĐĂƵƐĞĚĞůĂǇƐŝŶĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůůǇ͕ ƚŚŝƐŵĞƚŚŽĚǁŽƵůĚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƚĂŶŬƐĨŽƌƐůƵƌƌǇĂŶĚƐƉŽŝůƐ͕ĂůŽŶŐǁŝƚŚƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůƐƉĞĐŝĂůĚŝƐƉŽƐĂůƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐŝĨ ƚŚĞƐŽŝůĂŶĚŐƌŽƵŶĚǁĂƚĞƌĂƌĞĐŽŶƚĂŵŝŶĂƚĞĚ͘
dŚĞƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƚǇƉĞĨŽƌĚĞƐŝŐŶƐŚŽƵůĚďĞĂĚĞĞƉĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ͕ďĞĂƌŝŶŐŽŶƚŚĞĚĞŶƐĞŽůĚĞƌ ĂůůƵǀŝƵŵĚĞĞƉĞƌďĞůŽǁƚŚĞŐƌŽƵŶĚƐƵƌĨĂĐĞ͘dŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶdĞĂŵŚĂƐƉƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌŝůǇƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚϲĨĞĞƚĚŝĂŵĞƚĞƌ /,ƉŝůĞƐĨŽƌƚŚĞĨĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇƐƚƵĚǇ͘>ĂƌŐĞĚŝĂŵĞƚĞƌƐǁĞƌĞĐŚŽƐĞŶďĞĐĂƵƐĞƚŚĞǇŚĂǀĞƚŚĞƐŵĂůůĞƐƚ ƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚĨŽŽƚƉƌŝŶƚ͘ĂƐƚŝŶƌŝůůĞĚŚŽůĞŵĞƚŚŽĚƐĂƌĞƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚďĞĐĂƵƐĞƚŚĞǇĚŽŶŽƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƉŝůĞĚƌŝǀŝŶŐ ĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽƐĞŶƐŝƚŝǀĞŶŽŝƐĞƌĞĐĞƉƚŽƌƐĂŶĚƐĞŶƐŝƚŝǀĞĂƋƵĂƚŝĐƐƉĞĐŝĞƐ͘>ĂƐƚƚŚĞƚĞĂŵƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚĂĂůƚƌĂŶƐdǇƉĞ //ƐŚĂĨƚǁŚŝĐŚĂƌĞϮ͛ĚŝĂŵĞƚĞƌůĂƌŐĞƌƚŚĂŶƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚϰ͛ĚŝĂŵĞƚĞƌĐŽůƵŵŶƐ͘dǇƉĞ//ƐŚĂĨƚƐĂƌĞƐĞŝƐŵŝĐĂůůǇ ƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚĂŶĚĂƌĞďĞƚƚĞƌĂƚƌĞƐŝƐƚŝŶŐůŝƋƵĞĨĂĐƚŝŽŶĂŶĚůĂƚĞƌĂůƐƉƌĞĂĚŝŶŐůŽĂĚƐ͘ ^ĞĞƉƉĞŶĚŝǆ,ĨŽƌĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů'ĞŽƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂůŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ͘ ^
/^D/>K/E'
WƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌǇƐĞŝƐŵŝĐĚĂƚĂĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁĂƐ
ĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚƵƐŝŶŐĂůƚƌĂŶƐ͛Z^KŶůŝŶĞĂƉƉůŝĐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚ
ŐƵŝĚĞůŝŶĞƐƐĞƚĨŽƌƚŚŝŶƉƉĞŶĚŝǆŽĨƚŚĞĂůƚƌĂŶƐ
^ĞŝƐŵŝĐĞƐŝŐŶƌŝƚĞƌŝĂ;^Ϳ͘dŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĂƌƚŚƋƵĂŬĞ
ŝƐĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚƚŽŚĂǀĞĂŵĞĂŶŵĂŐŶŝƚƵĚĞŽĨϲ͘ϵǁŝƚŚĂ
ŵĞĂŶƐŝƚĞƚŽƐŽƵƌĐĞĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞŽĨĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϳ͘ϯ
ŵŝůĞƐ͘^ƵďƐƵƌĨĂĐĞĚĂƚĂĨƌŽŵƚŚĞϮϬϬϰĂůƚƌĂŶƐ
ďŽƌŝŶŐƐĨŽƌƚŚĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬƌŝĚŐĞ
ZĞƉůĂĐĞŵĞŶƚǁĂƐƵƐĞĚŝŶƚŚĞĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƐŽŝů
ĐůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶŝŶĂĐĐŽƌĚĂŶĐĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞ^͘dŚĞƐŝƚĞŝƐ ĐůĂƐƐŝĨŝĞĚĂƐĂ^ŝƚĞůĂƐƐ͕ƐƚŝĨĨƐŽŝůƐŝƚĞ͕ǁŝƚŚĂƐŚĞĂƌ ǁĂǀĞǀĞůŽĐŝƚǇŽĨϳϴϬĨĞĞƚƉĞƌƐĞĐŽŶĚ͘zĞŚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚ
ĐĐĞůĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĞƐƉŽŶƐĞ^ƉĞĐƚƌƵŵĨŽƌƚŚĞĞƐŝŐŶ

ǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶ
ĂƌƚŚƋƵĂŬĞ;ϵϳϱͲǇĞĂƌƌĞƚƵƌŶƉĞƌŝŽĚ͕ĞƐŝŐŶ
ĂƌƚŚƋƵĂŬĞͿ͘
dŚĞĐŽŶƚƌŽůůŝŶŐĚĞƐŝŐŶƌĞƐƉŽŶƐĞƐƉĞĐƚƌƵŵŝƐďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞƉƌŽďĂďŝůŝƐƚŝĐƐƉĞĐƚƌƵŵ͘dŚĞĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚƉĞĂŬ ŐƌŽƵŶĚĂĐĐĞůĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌƚŚĞďƌŝĚŐĞƐŝƚĞŝƐϬ͘ϲϱŐ͘
^ƵƌĨĂĐĞ&ĂƵůƚZƵƉƚƵƌĞ
dŚĞĐůŽƐĞƐƚYƵĂƚĞƌŶĂƌǇͲĂŐĞĨĂƵůƚƚŽƚŚĞƐŝƚĞŝƐƚŚĞDŝƐƐŝŽŶZŝĚŐĞ&ĂƵůƚƐǇƐƚĞŵ͕ĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϬ͘ϰŵŝůĞƐ ŶŽƌƚŚĞĂƐƚŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞ͕ǁŝƚŚĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůĨĂƵůƚƐƐƵĐŚĂƐƚŚĞDĞƐĂ&ĂƵůƚ͕>ĂǀŝŐŝĂ&ĂƵůƚŽŶĞ͕ZĞĚ DŽƵŶƚĂŝŶ&ĂƵůƚŽŶĞ͕KƌƚĞŐĂ,ŝůů&ĂƵůƚ͕ĂŶĚ^ĂŶƚĂzŶĞǌ&ĂƵůƚŽŶĞŽĐĐƵƌƌŝŶŐďĞƚǁĞĞŶϭ͘ϱĂŶĚϱ͘ϱŵŝůĞƐ ĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞ͘dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞŝƐŶŽƚǁŝƚŚŝŶĂŶůƋƵŝƐƚͲWƌŝŽůŽ ĂƌƚŚƋƵĂŬĞ&ĂƵůƚŽŶĞ͘EŽŬŶŽǁ
ĂĐƚŝǀĞŽƌƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůůǇĂĐƚŝǀĞĨĂƵůƚƐĂƌĞŵĂƉƉĞĚƚŚŽƵŐŚƚŚĞƐŝƚĞ͘dŚĞƌĞĨŽƌĞ͕ŶŽƐƉĞĐŝĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐ ĂƌĞŶĞĞĚĞĚƚŽĂĚĚƌĞƐƐĨĂƵůƚƌƵƉƚƵƌĞ͘
>ŝƋƵĞĨĂĐƚŝŽŶWŽƚĞŶƚŝĂů
>ŝƋƵĞĨĂĐƚŝŽŶŝƐƚŚĞůŽƐƐŽĨƐŽŝůƐƚƌĞŶŐƚŚĚƵĞƚŽĂŶŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞŝŶƐŽŝůƉŽƌĞǁĂƚĞƌƉƌĞƐƐƵƌĞĚƵĞƚŽƐĞŝƐŵŝĐŐƌŽƵŶĚ ƐŚĂŬŝŶŐ͘dŚŝƐƚǇƉŝĐĂůůǇŽĐĐƵƌƐŝŶůŽŽƐĞƚŽŵĞĚŝƵŵĚĞŶƐĞŐƌĂŶƵůĂƌƐŽŝůƚŚĂƚŝƐďĞůŽǁƚŚĞǁĂƚĞƌƚĂďůĞ͘^Žŝů ůĂǇĞƌƐ͕ďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞϮϬϬϰĂůƚƌĂŶƐďŽƌŝŶŐƐĨŽƌƚŚĞ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬƌŝĚŐĞ͕ǁĞƌĞƉƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌŝůǇĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚƚŽ ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
ďĞůŝƋƵĞĨŝĂďůĞ͘ŶĞǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶŽĨůŝƋƵĞĨĂĐƚŝŽŶƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůǁŽƵůĚďĞŶĞĞĚĞĚƚŽĂƐƐĞƐƐƚŚĞŝŵƉĂĐƚŽĨƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůůǇ ůŝƋƵĞĨŝĂďůĞƐŽŝůƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĨŽŽƚƉƌŝŶƚ͘^ƉĞĐŝĂůƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐǁŽƵůĚďĞŶĞĞĚĞĚĨŽƌĨŝŶĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶƚŽ ĂĚĚƌĞƐƐůŝƋƵĞĨĂĐƚŝŽŶŽƌƐĞŝƐŵŝĐƌĞůĂƚĞĚŚĂǌĂƌĚƐĨŽƌĂƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂŶĚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐ͘ ,zZh>/^
ĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞƉƌĞůŝŵŝŶĂƌǇƌĞƐƵůƚƐŽĨƚŚĞŚǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐƐŵŽĚĞů͕ƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚŽǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞǁŝůůƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶ ŶĞŐůŝŐŝďůĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶǁĂƚĞƌƐƵƌĨĂĐĞĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶ;t^ Ϳ͘&ƵƌƚŚĞƌĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐǁŝůůďĞŶĞĞĚĞĚ
ĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞĨŝŶĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶŽĨƚŚŝƐWƌŽũĞĐƚ͕ĂŶĚĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚĂĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶĂĚŵŝŶŝƐƚƌĂƚŽƌǁŝůůďĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƚŽ ĐŽƌƌŽďŽƌĂƚĞĂŶǇƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŚĂƐĂǁŝĚĞƌŽƉĞŶŝŶŐĂŶĚǁŝůů ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŵŽƌĞĨƌĞĞďŽĂƌĚƚŚĂŶƚŚĞƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐĂƚƚŚĞhWZZƚƌĂĐŬĂŶĚƚŚĞh^ϭϬϭďƌŝĚŐĞĞǀĞŶ ĂĨƚĞƌƚŚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞƐƉĂŶϭĂŶĚϯĨůŽŽĚďĂǇƐĂƌĞŽƉĞŶĞĚ͘dŚŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŝƐŶŽƚĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞ ƚŚĞƚĂƌŐĞƚĐŽŶǀĞǇĂŶĐĞĨůŽǁŽĨϯ͕ϬϬϬĐĨƐŝŶƚŚĞĐŚĂŶŶĞů͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚWƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůďĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĞĚƚŽĐŽŶǀĞǇ ƚŚĞƚĂƌŐĞƚĚŝƐĐŚĂƌŐĞŽĨϯ͕ϬϬϬĐĨƐĂŶĚŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŽŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶƚŚĞŐŽĂůƐŽĨƚŚĞDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶĨŽƌ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞ ƌĞĞŬ͘ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůŚǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐĂŶĚĂϮͲĚŝŵĞŶƐŝŽŶĂůŚǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐŵŽĚĞůĂƌĞƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞĨŝŶĂů ĚĞƐŝŐŶƉŚĂƐĞŝŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĂĐĐƵƌĂƚĞĨůŽǁƉĂƚŚƐĂƌŽƵŶĚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘ ,ǇĚƌŽůŽŐǇ
,ZŽďƚĂŝŶĞĚĨůŽǁƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƐŽƵƌĐĞƐ͗&
D&ůŽŽĚ/ŶƐƵƌĂŶĐĞ^ƚƵĚǇ;&/^Ϳ͕^ŽƵƚŚŽĂƐƚtĂƚĞƌƐŚĞĚ
DĂƉ;ϭϵϳϱͿ͕ĂŶĚ&
D>KDZ;ϮϬϭϵͿ͘,ZƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚƚŚĞ&
D>KDZĨŽƌƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĨůŽǁƐ;ϯ͕ϯϬϲĐĨƐϭϬϬ
ǇĞĂƌ͕Ϯ͕ϵϰϮĐĨƐϱϬǇĞĂƌͿďƵƚĂůƐŽĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚĂϯ͕ϬϬϬĐĨƐĨůŽǁĨƌŽŵƚŚĞDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶĂŶĚƚŚĞ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ WƌŽũĞĐƚ^ƚƵĚǇZĞƉŽƌƚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚďǇĞŶŐĂůŝŶϮϬϭϴ͘ĨůŽǁŽĨϯ͕ϬϬϬĐĨƐĞƋƵĂƚĞƐƚŽĂƐƚŽƌŵŽĨĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇ ϱϱǇĞĂƌƐ͘
tĂƚĞƌ^ƵƌĨĂĐĞ
ůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚ&ƌĞĞďŽĂƌĚ
dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶĂĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶ͘dŚĞŐŽĂůƐŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚďƌŝĚŐĞǁĞƌĞƚŽŚĂǀĞŶĞŐůŝŐŝďůĞ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƐŽŶƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĐƌĞĞŬŚǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐƐĂŶĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚĨƌĞĞďŽĂƌĚĂŶĚŚǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐĐĂƉĂĐŝƚǇƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞ ƚŽĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐ͘dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚďƌŝĚŐĞǁŝůůŚĂǀĞŶŽĨƌĞĞďŽĂƌĚĨŽƌƚŚĞϭϬϬǇĞĂƌƐƚŽƌŵ͕ĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞ ũƵƐƚŽǀĞƌϭ͛ŽĨĨƌĞĞďŽĂƌĚŽǀĞƌƚŚĞϱϬǇĞĂƌƐƚŽƌŵ͘ĚĞƐŝŐŶĞǆĐĞƉƚŝŽŶĨŽƌƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚĨƌĞĞďŽĂƌĚŵĂǇďĞ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚƐŝŶĐĞϮ͛ŝƐƚŚĞĐŽŵŵŽŶƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚŽǀĞƌƚŚĞϱϬǇĞĂƌƐƚŽƌŵ͘/ƚǁĂƐŶŽƚĨĞĂƐŝďůĞƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞϮ͛ŽĨ ĨƌĞĞďŽĂƌĚŽǀĞƌĂϱϬǇĞĂƌƐƚŽƌŵ
ĚƵĞƚŽŚŽǁĐůŽƐĞƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐ
ŐƌĂĚĞĐŽŶĨŽƌŵŝƐƌĞůĂƚŝǀĞƚŽƚŚĞ
ďĞŐŝŶŶŝŶŐŽĨƚŚĞďƌŝĚŐĞ͘
ŐƌĂĚĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚƐƉƌĞǀĞŶƚĞĚ
ƌĂŝƐŝŶŐƚŚĞƉƌŽĨŝůĞƌĂƉŝĚůǇƚŽ
ĂĐŚŝĞǀĞϮ͛͘/ĨƚŚĞĐŽŶĨŽƌŵ
ĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶǁĂƐƉƵƐŚĞĚĨƵƌƚŚĞƌ
ĨƌŽŵƚŚĞĐƌĞĞŬŝƚĐŽƵůĚďĞ
ƉŽƐƐŝďůĞƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚ
ĨƌĞĞďŽĂƌĚŽǀĞƌƚŚĞϱϬǇĞĂƌƐƚŽƌŵ͕
ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌǀĞƌǇĨĞǁďƌŝĚŐĞƐĂůŽŶŐ
^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬŵĞĞƚƚŚĂƚ
ƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚŐŝǀĞŶƚŚĞĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ
ƚŚĞĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚŐƌŽƵŶĚĂŶĚƚŚĞ
ĐĂƉĂĐŝƚǇŽĨ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ͘
ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
ŚĂŶŶĞů^ĐŽƵƌĂŶĚ^ůŽƉĞWƌŽƚĞĐƚŝŽŶ
dŚĞďƵƚŵĞŶƚϭĂŶĚĞŶƚϮƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐǁŝůůďĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚĞĚĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽ^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ͘ZŽĐŬƐůŽƉĞ ƉƌŽƚĞĐƚŝŽŶŝƐƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚƚŽƉƌŽƚĞĐƚƚŚĞƐĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘WŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůƐĐŽƵƌͬƐůŽƉĞƉƌŽƚĞĐƚŝŽŶǁŝůůŶĞĞĚƚŽ ĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĨƵƚƵƌĞŝŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚƐ͕ƐƵĐŚĂƐĨůŽŽĚǁĂůůƐ͕ƚŽǁŝĚĞŶƚŚĞĐŚĂŶŶĞů͘ƐĐŽƵƌĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐǁĂƐŶŽƚ ĐŽŶĚƵĐƚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚŝƐƐƚƵĚǇĂŶĚǁŝůůŶĞĞĚƚŽďĞĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞĚĚƵƌŝŶŐĂĨƵƚƵƌĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƉŚĂƐĞ͘ ^ĞĂ>ĞǀĞůZŝƐĞ
dŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂ^ĞĂͲ>ĞǀĞůZŝƐĞ'ƵŝĚĂŶĐĞ͕ϮϬϭϴ;ĂůŝĨŽƌŶŝĂŽĂƐƚĂůŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶ͕ϮϬϭϴͿĐĂŶďĞƵƐĞĚƚŽ ĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞ^ĞĂͲ>ĞǀĞůZŝƐĞĂƚƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞ͘ƐƐƵŵŝŶŐĂϳϱǇĞĂƌƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƐĞƌǀŝĐĞůŝĨĞ͕ĂŶĚĂϮϬϮϱ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƐĞĂƐŽŶĂƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝŽŶǇĞĂƌŽĨϮϭϬϬǁĂƐƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚ͘WƵďůŝƐŚĞĚǁĂƚĞƌƐƵƌĨĂĐĞĞůĞǀĂƚŝŽŶŐƵŝĚĂŶĐĞŝƐ ƉƌŽďĂďŝůŝƚǇͲďĂƐĞĚƌĂŶŐŝŶŐĨƌŽŵ>ŝŬĞůǇ;ϲϲйƉƌŽďĂďŝůŝƚǇƚŽŵĞĞƚŽƌĞǆĐĞĞĚͿƚŽ,ŝŐŚZŝƐŬǀĞƌƐŝŽŶ;Ϭ͘ϱй ƉƌŽďĂďŝůŝƚǇƚŽŵĞĞƚŽƌĞǆĐĞĞĚͿ͘WƌŽũĞĐƚŝŽŶƐĂƌĞĨƵƌƚŚĞƌďƌŽŬĞŶĚŽǁŶďǇĂƐƐƵŵĞĚĨƵƚƵƌĞ>Žǁ ŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐǀƐ͘
ĨƵƚƵƌĞ,ŝŐŚ
ŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ͘ƐƐƵŵŝŶŐŚŝŐŚĨƵƚƵƌĞĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐ͕^ĞĂ>ĞǀĞůƌŝƐĞĐŽƵůĚƌĂŶŐĞďĞƚǁĞĞŶϯ͘ϭĂŶĚϲ͘ϲ ĨĞĞƚǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƉƌŽďĂďŝůŝƚŝĞƐŽƵƚůŝŶĞĚĂďŽǀĞ͘&ƵƌƚŚĞƌĞǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶŽĨ^ĞĂůĞǀĞůZŝƐĞŝƐƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞ ĨƵƚƵƌĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘ƵƌƌĞŶƚƐƚƵĚŝĞƐƚŽĚĂƚĞŚĂǀĞŶŽƚŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚ^ĞĂ>ĞǀĞůZŝƐĞ͘ dƐƵŶĂŵŝZŝƐŬ
dƐƵŶĂŵŝƐĂƌĞĨŽƌŵĞĚĚƵƌŝŶŐƐĞŝƐŵŝĐĞǀĞŶƚƐŽƌƐƵďŵĂƌŝŶĞůĂŶĚƐůŝĚĞƐ͘ƚŚĞǇďĞŚĂǀĞůŝŬĞĂĨĂƐƚͲŵŽǀŝŶŐƚŝĚĞ ĂŶĚĐĂŶƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶƌƵŶͲƵƉƐĞǆƚĞŶĚŝŶŐŐƌĞĂƚĚŝƐƚĂŶĐĞƐƵƉƐƚƌĞĂŵƐ͕ƌŝǀĞƌƐĂŶĚĐƌĞĞŬƐ͘dŚĞƐŝƚĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶĨŽƌƚŚĞ ŽǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂƉƉƌŽǆŝŵĂƚĞůǇϭϮͲϭϳĨĞĞƚĂďŽǀĞƐĞĂůĞǀĞů͕ĂŶĚϬ͘ϯŵŝůĞƐŶŽƌƚŚŽĨƚŚĞWĂĐŝĨŝĐKĐĞĂŶ ƐŚŽƌĞůŝŶĞ͘ĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞ^,dKϮϬϮϮŐƵŝĚĞƐƉĞĐĨŽƌƌŝĚŐĞƐ^ƵďũĞĐƚĞĚƚŽdƐƵŶĂŵŝ ĨĨĞĐƚ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞEĂƚƵƌĂů
,ĂǌĂƌĚƐZŝƐŬĂŶĚZĞƐŝůŝĞŶĐǇZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĞŶƚĞƌdƐƵŶĂŵŝ/ŶƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶWŽƌƚĂů;E,ZϯϮϬϮϮͿ͕ƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ ŽǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐŝƐŶŽƚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚƚƐƵŶĂŵŝĚĞƐŝŐŶǌŽŶĞ;ĨŽƌĂϭϬϬϬǇĞĂƌƌĞƚƵƌŶƉĞƌŝŽĚͿ͘/ƚŝƐƉŽƐƐŝďůĞ ƚŚĂƚƚŚĞǁĞƐƚĞƌůǇƉŽƌƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞƉĂƚŚƐŽƵƚŚŽĨh^ϭϬϭŵĂǇŶĞĞĚƚŽĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌƚƐƵŶĂŵŝŚĂǌĂƌĚƐĨŽƌĚĞƐŝŐŶ͘ ^ĞĞƉƉĞŶĚŝǆ'ĨŽƌŵŽƌĞŚǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ͘
ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
Kd,
ZWZK:
dKE^dZ/Ed^
&ŽƌĂĨƵůůůŝƐƚŽƌƉƌŽũĞĐƚĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐƐĞĞƚŚĞĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐŵĂƉĞǆŚŝďŝƚůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶƉƉĞŶĚŝǆ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶƚŽ ƐŽŵĞŽĨƚŚĞĐŽŶƐƚƌĂŝŶƚƐůŝƐƚĞĚĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞĂĨĞǁŽƚŚĞƌƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐŝƐƐƵĞƐǁŽƌƚŚŵĞŶƚŝŽŶŝŶŐƚŚĂƚŵƵƐƚďĞ ƌĞƐŽůǀĞĚĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞĨŝŶĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶ͘
Eh^ϭϬϭKǀĞƌŚĞĂĚƐŝŐŶ
dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͬďŝĐǇĐůĞ
ŽǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐǁŝůůĐƌŽƐƐh^ϭϬϭũƵƐƚƉƌŝŽƌ
ƚŽƚŚĞEh^ϭϬϭ
ǆŝƚϵϲƐŝŐŶ͘dŚĞ
ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͬďŝĐǇĐůĞŽǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐǁŝůů
ŽďƐĐƵƌĞǀŝƐŝŽŶŽĨƚŚŝƐƐŝŐŶƐŽƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐ
ƐŝŐŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞǁŝůůŶĞĞĚƚŽďĞƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚ͘
dŚĞƐŝŐŶĐŽƵůĚďĞƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚĨƵƌƚŚĞƌĞĂƐƚ
ŽƌǁĞƐƚ͘dŚĞƐŝŐŶĐŽƵůĚĂůƐŽďĞĂůƐŽďĞ
ŵŽƵŶƚĞĚŽŶƚŚĞŶĞǁƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͬďŝĐǇĐůĞ
ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͕ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌďŽƚŚĂůƚƌĂŶƐĂŶĚ
ƚŚĞŝƚǇƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƐŝŐŶƌĞŵŝŶŽŶ
ĂŶŝŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚƐŝŐŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘
ZĞůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƐŝŐŶǁŝůůĂůƐŽƌĞƋƵŝƌĞ
ƌĞĐŽŶĨŝŐƵƌĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĐŽŶĐƌĞƚĞ
ďĂƌƌŝĞƌĂŶĚŐƵĂƌĚƌĂŝůĂƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚǁŚŝĐŚ
ĚĞĨůĞĐƚǀĞŚĐŝůĞƐĂǁĂǇĨƌŽŵƚŚĞĨŝǆĞĚƐŝŐŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞďĂƐĞ͘ ^ŽƵŶĚǁĂůů,ǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐKƉĞŶŝŶŐƐ
dŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐŽƵŶĚǁĂůůůŽĐĂƚĞĚŶŽƌƚŚŽĨh^
ϭϬϭŚĂƐŵƵůƚŝƉůĞŽƉĞŶŝŶŐƐĂƚƚŚĞďĂƐĞƚŚĂƚ
ĐĂŶďĞŽƉĞŶĞĚŝĨŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇƚŽĐŽŶǀĞǇ
ĨůŽŽĚǁĂƚĞƌƐ͘dŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐŝƚĞŝƐ
ůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶĂĨůŽŽĚƉůĂŝŶƐŽĚƵƌŝŶŐŚŝŐŚĞƌ
ĨůŽǁƐƚŚĞƐŽƵŶĚǁĂůůĐŽƵůĚĂĐƚĂƐĂďĂƌƌŝĞƌ
ĂŶĚĐĂƵƐĞĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůďĂĐŬǁĂƚĞƌĞĨĨĞĐƚƐ͘
tŚŝůĞŵŽƐƚŽĨƚŚĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͬďŝĐǇĐůĞ
ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞǁŝůůďĞĞůĞǀĂƚĞĚǁŝƚŚǀĞƌǇůŝƚƚůĞ
ŝŵƉĂĐƚƚŽĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĨůŽǁƐƚŚĞƌĞǁŝůůďĞĂ
ƉŽƌƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƐƚĂĐŬĞĚƌĂŵƉƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞƚŚĂƚƌƵŶƐƉĂƌĂůůĞůƚŽƚŚĞƐŽƵŶĚǁĂůůƐŚŽǁŶƚŽƚŚĞůĞĨƚ͘dŚĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚ ƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐƐƚƵĚǇƐŚŽǁƐĨŝůůĂƚƚŚŝƐůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐŝŶĐĞĨŝůůǁŽƵůĚďĞůĞƐƐĞǆƉĞŶƐŝǀĞƚŚĞŶŬĞĞƉŝŶŐƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ ĞůĞǀĂƚĞĚƵŶƚŝůĐŽŶĨŽƌŵ͘/ĨĨŝůůŝƐƵƐĞĚƚŚĞŶĐƵůǀĞƌƚƐǁŽƵůĚŶĞĞĚƚŽďĞƉůĂĐĞĚƚŚŽƵŐŚƚŚĞĨŝůůǁŚĂƚůŝŶĞƵƉ ǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĨůŽŽĚǁĂůůŽƉĞŶŝŶŐƐŝŶŽƌĚĞƌŶŽƚƌĞƐƚƌŝĐƚĂŶǇĨůŽǁƐ͘/ƚĐŽƵůĚďĞŵŽƌĞďĞŶĞĨŝĐŝĂůƚŽũƵƐƚŬĞĞƉƚŚĞ ŶŽƌƚŚƐƚĂĐŬĞĚƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĞůĞǀĂƚĞĚƵŶƚŝůƚŚĞĐŽŶĨŽƌŵƐŽĨůŽǁƐĐŽƵůĚŽĐĐƵƌƵŶĚĞƌƚŚĞƐƚĂĐŬĞĚƌĂŵƉƐĂŶĚ ƚŚƌŽƵŐŚƚŚĞƐŽƵŶĚǁĂůůŽƉĞŶŝŶŐƐ͘
ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ

ŽŽWĂƌŬŝŶŐ>Žƚ/ŵƉĂĐƚƐ
dŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚǁŝůůƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶďŽƚŚƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇĂŶĚ
ƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚŝŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽƚŚĞǌŽŽƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚ͘/ƚ
ŚĂƐďĞĞŶĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨ
ǁĂǇůŝŶĞŝƐŶŽƚůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞĐŚĂŝŶůŝŶŬ
ĨĞŶĐĞƐŚŽǁŶƚŽƚŚĞƌŝŐŚƚ͘dŚĞƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇ
ůŝŶĞŝƐůŽĐĂƚĞĚǀĞƌǇŶĞĂƌƚŚĞĂƐƉŚĂůƚůŝŵŝƚƐ;Žƌ
ũƵƐƚďĞůŽǁƚŚĞĨƌŽŶƚŽĨƚŚĞĐĂƌďƵŵƉĞƌƐ
ƐŚŽǁŶƚŽƚŚĞƌŝŐŚƚͿ͘dŚŝƐŵĞĂŶƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞ
ŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶĞĚŐĞŽĨĚĞĐŬĐĂŶ͛ƚĞǆƚĞŶĚŝŶƚŽƚŚĞ
ƉůĂŶƚĞƌƐƚƌŝƉĞďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞĐŚĂŝŶůŝŶŬĨĞŶĐĞ
ĂŶĚƚŚĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƉĂĐĞƐĂŶĚƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ
ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŵƵƐƚďĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚĞŶƚŝƌĞůǇĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞ
ĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚ͘dŚĞƐĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƉĂĐĞƐǁŝůů
ŶŽƚďĞĂďůĞƚŽďĞƵƚŝůŝǌĞĚĚƵƌŝŶŐƚŚĞ
ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĚƵƌĂƚŝŽŶ͘WƌĞĐĂƐƚŐŝƌĚĞƌĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƚŽƌĞĚƵĐĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƚŝŵĞĂŶĚƉĂƌƚŝĂůůǇ ŵŝƚŝŐĂƚĞĨŽƌƚŚĞƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƐƐ͘
dŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĐŽůƵŵŶƐǁŽƵůĚƌĞƐƵůƚŝŶƚŚĞƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚůŽƐƐŽĨĂƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƉůĂĐĞ ďĞůŽǁƚŚĞŵ͘ƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇƚŚĞƌĞĂƌĞϲĐŽůƵŵŶƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇŝŶƚŚĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚ͘dŚĞƌĞĐŽƵůĚĂůƐŽďĞ ƐŽŵĞǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞŝƐƐƵĞƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŝƚƐĞůĨĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞǁĞƐƚĞŶĚŽĨƚŚĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚ͘dŚĞďƌŝĚŐĞ ƉƌŽĨŝůĞŝƐĐůŝŵďŝŶŐĂƐƋƵŝĐŬůǇĂƐƉŽƐƐŝďůĞ͕ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌĂƐĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚŝŶŵĂŶǇƐĞĐƚŝŽŶƐĂďŽǀĞƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚŝƐ ůŝŵŝƚĞĚƚŽƚŚĞŵĂǆŝŵƵŵŐƌĂĚĞŽĨϱй͘dŚŝƐĚŽĞƐŶŽƚĂůůŽǁƚŚĞƉƌŽĨŝůĞƚŽĐůŝŵďĞŶŽƵŐŚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĨŽƌ ĂĚĞƋƵĂƚĞƌŽŽŵďĞůŽǁƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĨŽƌƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞǁĞƐƚĞŶĚ͘/ŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽůŝŵŝƚƚŚĞůŽƐƐŽĨƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ͕ ƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶƚĞĂŵŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƐŝŶŐĞůŝŵŝŶĂƚŝŶŐƐŽŵĞŽĨƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐŝŶƚĞƌŵĞĚŝĂƚĞƉůĂŶƚĞƌƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶƐƉĂĐĞƐĂŶĚ ƵƐĞƚŚĂƚƌŽŽŵĨŽƌĐŽůƵŵŶƐ͘ƵĞƚŽŚĞĂǀǇĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚĨŽƌĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶŝŶƐƚĂůůĂƚŝŽŶŵƵĐŚŽĨƚŚĞ ŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂƌĞĂĂƐƉŚĂůƚĐŽƵůĚďĞĚĂŵĂŐĞĚĚƵƌŝŶŐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘/ƚŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƚŽƌĞƉĂǀĞĂŶĚƌĞƐƚƌŝƉĞ ƚŚĞŶŽƌƚŚĞƌŶƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂƌĞĂĂƐƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘/ŶƚŽƚĂůƚŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶdĞĂŵĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐƚŚĞƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇůŽƐƐŽĨ ϱϲƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƉĂĐĞƐĚƵƌŝŶŐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚϱƉĞƌŵĂŶĞŶƚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐƐƉĂĐĞƐĚƵĞƚŽĐŽůƵŵŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŶĚ ǁĞƐƚĞƌŶƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚǀĞƌƚŝĐĂůĐůĞĂƌĂŶĐĞŝƐƐƵĞƐ;^ĞĞƉƉĞŶĚŝǆĨŽƌĂƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚĞǆŚŝďŝƚͿ͘ůůƚƌĞĞƐďĞƚǁĞĞŶ ƚŚĞĨĞŶĐĞĂŶĚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂƌĞĂŵƵƐƚĂůƐŽďĞƌĞŵŽǀĞĚƚŽĂůůŽǁƌŽŽŵĨŽƌƚŚĞŶĞǁďƌŝĚŐĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘dŚĞ ŽǀĞƌŚĞĂĚƵƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐǁŝůůĂůƐŽŶĞĞĚƚŽďĞƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚ͘'ƌŽǁƚŚŽĨƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐǀĞŐĞƚĂƚŝŽŶŽƌĨƵƚƵƌĞǀĞŐĞƚĂƚŝŽŶ ǁŝƚŚŝŶhWZZƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞĨĞŶĐĞĂŶĚƉĂƌŬŝŶŐůŽƚŵĂǇĂůƐŽďĞůŝŵŝƚĞĚďǇĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƐŚĂĚĞĨƌŽŵ ƚŚĞƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶͬďŝĐǇĐůĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘
ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂ'ƌĞĞŶDŽďŝůĞ,ŽŵĞWĂƌŬ
>ŽĐĂƚĞĚĂƚϭϮϬϬWƵŶƚĂ'ŽƌĚĂ^ƚĞĞƚƚŚĞ^ĂŶƚĂĂƌďĂƌĂ
'ƌĞĞŶDŽďŝůĞ,ŽŵĞWĂƌŬŚĂƐƚŚĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůƚŽďĞ
ĂĨĨĞĐƚĞĚďǇƚŚĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚ͘dǇƉŝĐĂůĐŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƚŚŽƵŐŚƚŚĞ ƉĂƌŬŝƐŽŶĞǁĂǇĨƌŽŵWƵŶƚĂ'ŽƌĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚƚŽƚŚĞĞǆŝƚ
ŶĞĂƌƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞƐƚĂĐŬĞĚƌĂŵƉ
ƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞƵůͲĞͲ^ĂĐĨƌŽŵ^ŽƵƚŚĂŶĂĚĂĂŶĚ
>ŽƐWŝƚŽƐ^ƚƌĞĞƚƐ͘dŚĞƐƚĂĐŬĞĚƌĂŵƉƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŝƐ
ĐƵƌƌĞŶƚƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƚŽ
ĞŶĐƌŽĂĐŚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐ
ƉĂǀĞŵĞŶƚŝŶŽƌĚĞƌƚŽ
ƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂŵŽƌĞŐƌĂĚƵĂů
ƌĂŵƉŐƌĂĚĞ͘ĨƚĞƌŝƚǇ
ĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĨŝƌĞ
ĚĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ͕ƚŚĞǇƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĂ
ŵŝŶŝŵƵŵŽĨϮϬ͛ĨŽƌŝŶŐƌĞƐƐ
ĂŶĚĞŐƌĞƐƐ͘ǁŝĚƚŚŽĨϮϭ
ĨĞĞƚŝƐƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ͕ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ
ƚŚĂƚǁŽƵůĚƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƌĞŵŽǀĂů
ŽĨƐĞǀĞƌĂůƚƌĞĞƐĂŶĚƌĞĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚŽĨƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĚƌŝǀĞǁĂǇĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞ ĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĨĞŶĐĞůŝŶĞ͘/ĨƚŚĞƐĞĞŶĐƌŽĂĐŚŵĞŶƚƐĂƌĞĚĞĞŵĞĚƚŽďĞ ƵŶĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ͕ƚŚĞƌĂŵƉƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞŐƌĂĚĞƐĐŽƵůĚďĞŝŶĐƌĞĂƐĞĚƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĨŽƌ ůĞƐƐĞŶĐƌŽĂĐŚŵĞŶƚŝŶƚŽƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƉĂǀĞŵĞŶƚ͘&ƵƌƚŚĞƌĐŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶŝƐ ŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇƚŽĚĞƚĞƌŵŝŶĞŝĨƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇĐůŽƐƵƌĞƐĐŽƵůĚďĞĂĐĐŽŵŵŽĚĂƚĞĚ ĚƵƌŝŶŐĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͘ƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇĐůŽƐƵƌĞŽĨƚŚŝƐĚƌŝǀĞǁĂǇŝƐ ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚďĂƐĞĚŽŶƐĂĨĞƚǇĐŽŶĐĞƌŶƐ͘>ĂƌŐĞĐƌĂŶĞƐĂŶĚŽƚŚĞƌĞƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚǁŝůůďĞŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇƚŽĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚ ƚŚĞƐƚĂĐŬĞĚƌĂŵƉƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ͘
^ƵŶƌŝƐĞZsWĂƌŬ
/ŵƉĂĐƚƐƚŽƚŚĞ^ƵŶƌŝƐĞZsWĂƌŬĂƌĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŽďĞ
ŵŝŶŝŵĂůĂŶĚůŝŵŝƚĞĚƚŽƚĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŶŽŝƐĞĂŶĚ ƉĞƌŚĂƉƐƐŽŵĞĨĞŶĐŝŶŐĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇůŝŶĞ͘ KǀĞƌŚĞĂĚƵƚŝůŝƚŝĞƐǁŽƵůĚĂůƐŽŶĞĞĚƚŽďĞƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂƚƚŚŝƐ ůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶĂƐƚŚĞǇĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůǇŝŶƚĞƌĨĞƌĞǁŝƚŚƚŚĞƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚ ĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘
ATTACHMENT 3
ĂŶĂĚĂ^ƚƌĞĞƚWĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶĂŶĚŝĐǇĐůĞKǀĞƌĐƌŽƐƐŝŶŐ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇ
WZK:
dK^d
^d/Dd
^
dŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶdĞĂŵŚĂƐĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚƚŚƌĞĞĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚƉƌŽũĞĐƚĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐ͘ dŚĞĨŝƌƐƚĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞŝƐĂŶĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞĐŽƐƚĐŽŵƉĂƌŝƐŽŶ͘KŶůǇďŝĚŝƚĞŵƐĂŶĚƋƵĂŶƚŝƚŝĞƐƚŚĂƚĂƌĞĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚ ďĞƚǁĞĞŶĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐĂƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞ͘>ŝŬĞŝƚĞŵƐĂŶĚƋƵĂŶƚŝƚŝĞƐŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶŽŵŝƚƚĞĚ͘dŚŝƐ ĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐŚŽƵůĚŽŶůǇďĞƵƐĞĚƚŽĐŽŵƉĂƌĞƚŚĞĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶĐĞŝŶƉƌŝĐĞďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞǀĂƌŝŽƵƐĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐ͘ dŚĞƐĞĐŽŶĚĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞŝƐƚŚĞƚŽƚĂůĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞ͘dŚĞĚĞƐŝŐŶdĞĂŵĞůĞĐƚĞĚ ƚŽƉƌĞƉĂƌĞƚŚĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚĨŽƌƚŚĞƐŝŶŐůĞƐƉĂŶƚƌƵƐƐĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞ͘ůůďŝĚŝƚĞŵƐŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇĨŽƌ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĂƌĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞ͘/ƚĞŵƐŵĂǇďĞĂĚĚĞĚŽƌƐƵďƚƌĂĐƚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞŽŶĐĞŵŽƌĞ ƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐƚƵĚŝĞƐĂƌĞĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚ͕ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌƚŚŝƐůŝƐƚƐŚŽǁƐĂůůƚŚĞĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚďŝĚŝƚĞŵƐƚŽĚĂƚĞ͘ dŚĞƚŚŝƌĚĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞŝƐĂƚŽƚĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚĐŽƐƚĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞ͘dŚŝƐĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞŝŶĐůƵĚĞƐĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĚĚĞƐŝŐŶ͕ŝƚǇ ŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚ͕ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͕ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĞŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ͕ĐŽŶƚŝŶŐĞŶĐǇ͕ĂŶĚĞƐĐĂůĂƚŝŽŶƚŽĨƵƚƵƌĞĚĞƐŝŐŶĂŶĚ ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶǇĞĂƌƐ͘dŚŝƐĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞĐĂŶďĞƵƐĞĚƚŽƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƚŚĞĞŶƚŝƌĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĐŽƐƚĂŶĚƐĞĐƵƌĞĨƵƚƵƌĞŐƌĂŶƚ ĨƵŶĚŝŶŐ͘dŽƚĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚĐŽƐƚƐĂƌĞƐƵŵŵĂƌŝǌĞĚďĞůŽǁ͘ĞƚĂŝůĞĚĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐĂƌĞůŽĐĂƚĞĚŝŶƉƉĞŶĚŝǆ͘ ĞƐŝŐŶŽƐƚ ΨϮ͕ϱϯϲ͕ϬϬϬ
ŝƚǇDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚŽƐƚ ΨϮϱϯ͕ϬϬϬ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽƐƚ Ψϭϱ͕ϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ ΨϮ͕ϯϮϱ͕ϬϬϬ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽŶƚŝŶŐĞŶĐǇ;ϮϬйͿ Ψϯ͕ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ

ƐĐĂůĂƚŝŽŶƚŽϮϬϯϬ;ϱйͬǇƌͿ Ψϴ͕ϴϬϱ͕ϬϬϬ
dŽƚĂů ΨϯϮ͕ϱϭϵ͕ϬϬϬ
KE>h^/KE^
ůůƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐǁĞƌĞƐƚƵĚŝĞƐĂŶĚĂƌĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚĨĞĂƐŝďůĞ͘/ŶŐĞŶĞƌĂů͕ƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĐŽƐƚĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞƐ ƐŚŽǁƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƌĞŝƐŽŶůǇĂŵĂƌŐŝŶĂůĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶĐĞďĞƚǁĞĞŶƚŚĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐǁŚĞŶĐŽŵƉĂƌĞĚƚŽƚŚĞƚŽƚĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚ ĐŽƐƚ͘tŚŝůĞƚŚĞƐŝŶŐůĞĐůĞĂƌƐƉĂŶƚƌƵƐƐŚĂƐĂŚŝŐŚĞƌƐƵƉĞƌƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĐŽƐƚ͕ƚŚĞŵƵůƚŝƐƉĂŶĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐĂƌĞ ŽĨĨƐĞƚďǇŚŝŐŚĞƌĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶĐŽƐƚƐ͘dŚĞŵƵůƚŝƐƉĂŶĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐĂůƐŽŚĂǀĞŵŽƌĞŝŵƉĂĐƚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞĂůƚƌĂŶƐ ƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĞĚǁŝƚŚŚŝŐŚĞƌƚƌĂĨĨŝĐĐŽŶƚƌŽůĐŽƐƚĂŶĚĐŽƐƚĨŽƌdĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇZĂŝůŝŶŐdǇƉĞ<ƚŚĂƚǁŽƵůĚ ďĞŶĞĐĞƐƐĂƌǇƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂƐĂĨĞǁŽƌŬǌŽŶĞƚŽĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŶĞǁďƌŝĚŐĞĨŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶƐ͘ KƵƚŽĨƚŚĞƚŚƌĞĞĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐ͕ƚŚĞƐŝŶŐůĞƐƉĂŶƉƌĞĨĂďƌŝĐĂƚĞĚƐƚĞĞůƚƌƵƐƐĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƐŚŽƵůĚďĞĐŽŶƐŝĚĞƌĞĚƚŚĞ ƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚŽƉƚŝŽŶ͘dŚŝƐƉƌĞǀĞŶƚƐƚŚĞŶĞĞĚĨŽƌƚŚĞƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŝŶŐƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞǁŝƚŚŝŶĂůƚƌĂŶƐƌŝŐŚƚͲŽĨͲǁĂǇĂŶĚ ƐŝŵƉůŝĨŝĞƐƚŚĞĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞŵĂŝŶƐƉĂŶ͘ƐƚĞĞůƉƌĞĨĂďƌŝĐĂƚĞĚƚƌƵƐƐĐŽƵůĚďĞŵĂŶƵĨĂĐƚƵƌĞĚŽĨĨƐŝƚĞĂŶĚ ĂƐƐĞŵďůĞĚĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞĂůŝŐŶŵĞŶƚ͘dŚŝƐĐŽƵůĚƚŚĞŶďĞƉůĂĐĞĚƵƐŝŶŐŵƵůƚŝƉůĞĐƌĂŶĞƐĚƵƌŝŶŐĂ ƐŝŶŐůĞŶŝŐŚƚĐůŽƐƵƌĞŽĨh^ϭϬϭ͘dŚŝƐĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞŚĂƐƚŚĞŐƌĞĂƚĞƐƚĂĞƐƚŚĞƚŝĐĨůĞǆŝďŝůŝƚǇĂŶĚŵŝŶŝŵŝǌĞƐƚŚĞ ŝŵƉĂĐƚƚŽh^ϭϬϭĂŶĚƌŝŐŚƚŽĨǁĂǇŝŵƉĂĐƚƐ͘
ATTACHMENT 3
WW
E/y
WZK:
dKE^dZ/Ed^DW

ATTACHMENT 3
PP
S
S
S
S
S
PP
PP
PP
ARV
S
S
D
D
D
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
JP
SCALE: 1" = 20'

ATTACHMENT
3 WW
E/y
>/'ED
EdW>EEWZK&/>

ATTACHMENT 3
24" PINE
6", 8" PINE
6" TREE 4", 4" TREE 4" TREE
12" TREE 12" PINE
28" PINE
6" EUC20" CYP
20" PINE
6" CYP24" CYP
12", 8" EUC
6" PALM
4" EUC
15" EUC
(2)4", 12" EUC 5" TREE (2)20", 11" EUC
S
S
PP
/
/ /
/ / /
/
/ /
/
/ /
ARV
S

RAILROAD BRIDGE

S SOLEDAD ST

NINOS DR
101 FREEWAY UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
JP
/
/ /
/ / /
/
/ /
/
/ /

RAILROAD BRIDGE

NINOS DR
101 FREEWAY
S
O/H
O/H
O
D
E
H
15" EUC
5" TREE (2)20", 11" EUC
S
S

S SOLEDAD ST
15"
S
TREE
12" TREE
CYP
P
4" EUC
1 (2)4", 12" EUC
S
PP
O/H
O/H
O/H
O/H
JP
V
O
6" TRE
20" CY
NE
CYP
M
PP
O/H
O/H
O/H
D
24" PINE
6", 8" PINE
6" T 4", 4" TREE 4" TREE
12" PINE
28" PINE
6" EUC20"
20" PINE
6" CYP24" CYP
12", 8" EUC
6" PALM

ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENTS

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
PLAN
SCALE: 1" = 20'

ATTACHMENT
3 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x SCALE: 1" = 20'
ATTACHMENT 3

NINOS DR
S. CANADA ST PITOS ST

CURVE DATA
PLAN

CANADA POC

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

PRELIMINARY LAYOUT (SINGLE SPAN)

PLAN AND PROFILE

NINOS DR
S. CANADA ST PITOS ST

CURVE DATA
PLAN

CANADA POC

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

PRELIMINARY LAYOUT (TWO-SPAN)

PLAN AND PROFILE

NINOS DR
S. CANADA ST PITOS ST

CURVE DATA
PLAN

CANADA POC

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

PRELIMINARY LAYOUT (THREE-SPAN)

PLAN AND PROFILE

ATTACHMENT
3 WW
E/y
Z/'
sE
W>EE/E'^dh/
^

ATTACHMENT 3
56+00
57+00
58+00
59+00
60+00
61+00
62+00
63+00
/ / / / / /
/ /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/ /
/
/ / / / / /

O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H

PLANNING STUDY

CANADA STREET POC

TYPICAL SECTION ALTERNATIVES

ELEVATION
PLAN

SYCAMORE CREEK FRAME

ATTACHMENT
3 / / /
/ / /
/ / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / /
/ / / / / / / / / / / /
/ / / / / /
/ / /
D
D

D O/H O/H
O/H 1216.768 AC 1229 14.494 EG 12304.016 EG 12313.773 EG 1232 13.452 EG 12333.779 EG 12343.714 EG 1243 13.464 EG PLANNING STUDY

CANADA STREET POC

TYPICAL SECTION ALTERNATIVE

ELEVATION
PLAN

STACKED RAMP FRAME
ATTACHMENT 3
63+00
CITY OF S.B. GRANTS TO RAILROAD

CROSSING AGREEMENT AS SHOWN ON
U.P.R.R. RIGHT OF WAY MAP, LABELED NO. 18.

INSTRUMENT ORD. 139 04/21/1887
NOTE 5: RENEWED FOR 25 YEARS BY FR. AUD. NO. 3541.

S
S

PLANNING STUDY

CANADA STREET POC

ELEVATION
PLAN
US 101 FRAME: ALT 1

TYPICAL SECTION ALTERNATIVE
ATTACHMENT 3
63+00
CITY OF S.B. GRANTS TO RAILROAD

CROSSING AGREEMENT AS SHOWN ON
U.P.R.R. RIGHT OF WAY MAP, LABELED NO. 18.

INSTRUMENT ORD. 139 04/21/1887
NOTE 5: RENEWED FOR 25 YEARS BY FR. AUD. NO. 3541.

S
S

PLANNING STUDY

CANADA STREET POC

ELEVATION
PLAN
US 101 FRAME: ALT 2

TYPICAL SECTION ALTERNATIVES
ATTACHMENT 3
63+00
CITY OF S.B. GRANTS TO RAILROAD

CROSSING AGREEMENT AS SHOWN ON
U.P.R.R. RIGHT OF WAY MAP, LABELED NO. 18.

INSTRUMENT ORD. 139 04/21/1887
NOTE 5: RENEWED FOR 25 YEARS BY FR. AUD. NO. 3541.

S
S

PLANNING STUDY

CANADA STREET POC

ELEVATION
PLAN
US 101 FRAME: ALT 3

TYPICAL SECTION ALTERNATIVES
ATTACHMENT 3
WW
E/y
KE^dZhd/KEK^d
^d/Dd
^

ATTACHMENT 3
Project: Canada POC
Job No.: By: Gavin K Date: 1/3/2022
Description: Quantities
Checked By: Gavin K
Quantities Quantity Cost
Unit Unit Price
Alt 1 Alt 2 (Girder) Alt 2 (Box) Alt 3 (Girder) Alt 3 (Box) Alt 1 Alt 2 (Girder) Alt 2 (Box) Alt 3 (Girder) Alt 3 (Box) CIDH Pile (72") LF $ 3,200 835 880 880 910 910 $ 2,672,000 $ 2,816,000 $ 2,816,000 $ 2,912,000 $ 2,912,000 Erect Truss LS $ 350,000 1 $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Furnish Connector Truss** LS 1,250,000 $ 1 $ 1,250,000 $ - $ - $ - $ -Furnish Precast PS Concrete Girder (80') EA $ 20,000 21 24 30 $ 420,000 $ 480,000 $ - $ 600,000 $ - Erect PC PS Concrete Girder (80') EA $ 20,000 21 24 30 $ 420,000 $ 480,000 $ - $ 600,000 $ - Furnish Precast PS Concrete Girder (150') EA 100,000 $ 3 $ - $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ - Erect PC PS Concrete Girder (150') EA $ 80,000 3 $ - $ 240,000 $ - $ - $ - Furnish PC PS Concrete Bathtub Girder (80') EA $ 90,000 8 10 $ - $ - $ 720,000 $ - $ 900,000 Erect PC PS Concrete Bathtub Girder (80') EA $ 50,000 8 10 $ - $ - $ 400,000 $ - $ 500,000Furnish PC PS Concrete Bathtub Girder (150') EA 250,000 $ 1 $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ - $ - Erect PC PS Concrete Bathtub Girder (150') EA 200,000 $ 1 $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ - $ -Structural Concrete, Bridge (Polymer Fiber) CY $ 3,000 668 712 729 712 729 $ 2,003,490 $ 2,137,192 $ 2,186,254 $ 2,137,192 $ 2,186,254 Structural Concrete, Bridge CY $ 4,000 245 264.0 264.0 288.5 288.5 $ 980,319 $ 1,055,967 $ 1,055,967 $ 1,153,956 $ 1,153,956 Joint Seal (MR 1.5") LF $ 48 200 60 60 48 48 $ 9,600 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 9,600 $ 9,600 Bar Reinforcing Steel (Bridge) LB $ 524483 555423 559103 572793 576473 2.00 $ 1,048,966 $ 1,110,847 $ 1,118,206 $ 1,145,586 $ 1,152,945 Railroad Flagging DAY 1,400.00 $ 2 22 22 22 22 $ 2,800 $ 30,800 $ 30,800 $ 30,800 $ 30,800 Traffic Control DAY 5,000.00 $ 4 24 24 44 44 $ 20,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 220,000 $ 220,000 Krail LF $ 30.00 0 160 160 480 480 $ - $ 4,800 $ 4,800 $ 14,400 $ 14,400 Temporary alternative crash cushion LF 5,000.00 $ 0 1 1 3 3 $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000Decorative Hand Rail LF $ 2403 2853 2853 2853 2853 600 $ 1,441,800 $ 1,712,004 $ 1,712,004 $ 1,712,004 $ 1,712,004 Natina Finish for Truss LS $ 450,000 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Paint Finish for Truss LS $ 90,000 0 0 0 0 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,504,610 10,618,974 $ $ 10,631,031 $ 10,550,538 $ 10,806,959 *Not all items included, cost comparison purposes only
ALTERNATIVE COST COMPARISON*

SUBTOTAL
**Add $350,000 for Keystone Upgrade Add $90,000 for 2-Coat Paint Finish Add $450,000 for Natina Finish 1/1

ATTACHMENT
3 Consor
PROJECT REPORT 20% CONTINGENCY Date 1/3/2023
Bridge Check Q's By
Item No. Item Code Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total 1 070030 LEAD COMPLIANCE PLAN LS LUMP SUM $ 5,000 $ 5,000 2 120090 CONSTRUCTION AREA SIGNS LS LUMP SUM $ 10,000 $ 10,000 3 120100 TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM LS LUMP SUM $ 20,000 $ 20,000 4 130100 JOB SITE MANAGEMENT LS LUMP SUM $ 100,000 $ 100,000 5 130300 PREPARE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN LS LUMP SUM $ 3,000 $ 3,000 6 130310 RAIN EVENT ACTION PLAN EA 25 $ 500 $ 12,500
7 130320 STORM WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS DAY EA 150 $ 400 $ 60,000 8 130330 STORM WATER ANNUAL REPORT EA 2 $ 2,000 $ 4,000 9 130620 TEMPORARY DRAINAGE INLET PROTECTION EA 10 $ 250 $ 2,500 10 130640 TEMPORARY FIBER ROLL LF 800 $ 3 $ 2,400
11 130710 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA 3 $ 5,000 $ 15,000 12 130900 TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT LS LUMP SUM $ 25,000 $ 25,000 13 160110 TEMPORARY HIGH-VISIBILITY FENCE LF 800 $ 8 $ 6,400 14 170103 CLEARING AND GRUBBING (LS) LS LUMP SUM $ 50,000 $ 50,000 15 190101 ROADWAY EXCAVATION CY 980 $ 140 $ 137,200
16 198010 IMPORTED BORROW (CY) CY 255 $ 120 $ 30,600
17 210350 FIBER ROLLS LF 800 $ 5 $ 4,000
18 210420 STRAW SQFT 3000 $ 1 $ 1,500
19 260203 CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE (CY) CY 655 $ 130 $ 85,150 20 390132 HOT MIX ASPHALT (TYPE A) TON 660 $ 350 $ 231,000 21 568056 RELOCATE SIGN STRUCTURE EA 1 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 22 600001 PUBLIC SAFETY PLAN LS LUMP SUM $ 10,000 $ 10,000 23 665018 18" CORRUGATED STEEL PIPE (.109" THICK) LF 50 $ 250 $ 12,500 24 723095 ROCK SLOPE PROTECTION (20 lb, CLASS I, METHOD B) (CY) CY 200 $ 500 $ 100,000 25 731502 MINOR CONCRETE (MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION) CY 5 $ 1,500 $ 7,500 26 840515 THERMOPLASTIC PAVEMENT MARKING SQFT 25 $ 15 $ 375 27 840501 THERMOPLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPE LF 800 $ 2 $ 1,400 28 999994 BIOSWALE LS LUMP SUM $ 25,000 $ 25,000
29 999995 RAILROAD FLAGGING LS LUMP SUM $ 2,800 $ 2,800 30 F 192003 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION (BRIDGE) CY 10 $ 250 $ 2,500 31 F 193003 STRUCTURE BACKFILL (BRIDGE) CY 10 $ 200 $ 2,000 32 F 477020 MECHANICALLY STABILIZED EMBANKMENT SQFT 565 $ 100 $ 56,500 33 480300 TEMPORARY SUPPORT LS LUMP SUM $ 50,000 $ 50,000 34 490611 72" CAST-IN-DRILLED-HOLE CONCRETE PILING LF 835 $ 3,200 $ 2,672,000 35 F 510053 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE CY 245 $ 4,000 $ 980,000 36 F 510051 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE FOOTING CY 10 $ 800 $ 8,000 37 F 510054 STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, BRIDGE (POLYMER FIBER) CY 670 $ 3,400 $ 2,278,000 38 512207 FURNISH PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE GIRDER (80'-90') EA 24 $ 20,000 $ 480,000 39 512500 ERECT PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONCRETE GIRDER EA 24 $ 20,000 $ 480,000 40 519091 JOINT SEAL (MR 1 1/2") LF 50 $ 200 $ 10,000
41 F 520102 BAR REINFORCING STEEL (BRIDGE) LB 524485 $ 2 $ 1,048,970 42 F 750505 BRIDGE DECK DRAINAGE SYSTEM LB 8000 $ 25 $ 200,000 43 833999 DECORATIVE HAND RAIL LF 2405 $ 600 $ 1,443,000 44 870200 LIGHTING SYSTEM LS LUMP SUM $ 400,000 $ 400,000 45 999992 FURNISH TRUSS BRIDGE LS LUMP SUM $ 1,700,000 $ 1,700,000 46 999993 ERECT TRUSS BRIDGE LS LUMP SUM $ 350,000 $ 350,000 47 999998 NATINA FINISH FOR TRUSS LS LUMP SUM $ 450,000 $ 450,000 48 999990 MOBILIZATION LS LUMP SUM $ 1,407,580 $ 1,407,580 SUBTOTAL CONTRACT $ 15,483,375

SUPPLEMENTAL WORK
49 $ -
50 $ -
51 066015 FEDERAL TRAINEE PROGRAM LS LUMP SUM 800.00 $ $ 800 52 $ -
SUBTOTAL SUPPLEMENTAL WORK $ 800
SUBTOTAL 15,484,175 $
CONTINGENCIES 20.0% 3,096,826 $
TOTAL $ 18,581,000
Project. No.

Road Q's By
Project Name
Bridge Name
Canada POC
Single Span Steel Truss
Bridge. No. New
ATTACHMENT 3
>ŽǁĞƌ
ĂƐƚƐŝĚĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚǇĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶŽƐƚ ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞ
^ŚĞĞƚŽƵŶƚ ŝǀŝů^ŚĞĞƚ
ϭ dŝƚůĞϮ dǇƉŝĐĂůƌŽƐƐ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϯ >ĂǇŽƵƚϭ;ŶŽƌƚŚƐŝĚĞͿϰ >ĂǇŽƵƚϮ;ƐŽƵƚŚƐŝĚĞͿϱ WƌŽĨŝůĞΘ^ƵƉĞƌϲ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĞƚĂŝůƐϭ;ŽŶƚŽƵƌ'ƌĂĚŝŶŐyǁĂůŬ^ŽƵƚŚͿϳ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĞƚĂŝůƐϮ;ƌŝǀĞǁĂǇͬ^ŝĚĞǁĂůŬĞƚĂŝůƐEŽƌƚŚͿϴ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĞƚĂŝůƐϯ;DŝƐĐ͘ĞƚĂŝůƐͿϵ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶĞƚĂŝůƐϰ;ZĞůŽĐĂƚĞh^ϭϬϭ^ŝŐŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞͿ ϭϬ dĞŵƉŽƌĂƌǇƌĞĞŬŝǀĞƌƐŝŽŶϭϭ
ƌŽƐŝŽŶŽŶƚƌŽůWůĂŶϭϮ hƚŝůŝƚǇWůĂŶEŽ͘ϭϭϯ hƚŝůŝƚǇWůĂŶEŽ͘Ϯϭϰ ƌĂŝŶĂŐĞ>ĂǇŽƵƚϭϱ ƌĂŝŶĂŐĞĞƚĂŝůƐϭϭϲ ƌĂŝŶĂŐĞĞƚĂŝůƐϮϭϳ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶƌĞĂ^ŝŐŶͬĞƚŽƵƌͬdƌĂĨĨŝĐŽŶƚƌŽůWůĂŶϭϴ dƌĞĞZĞŵŽǀĂůWůĂŶϭϵ ^ƵŵŵĂƌǇŽĨYƵĂŶƚŝƚŝĞƐ ATTACHMENT 3
>ŽǁĞƌ
ĂƐƚƐŝĚĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚǇĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶŽƐƚ ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞ
^ŚĞĞƚŽƵŶƚ ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞ^ŚĞĞƚƐ
ϭ 'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶEŽ͘ϭϮ 'ĞŶĞƌĂůWůĂŶEŽ͘Ϯϯ /ŶĚĞǆƚŽWůĂŶƐϰ 'ĞŶĞƌĂůEŽƚĞƐϱ ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞWůĂŶEŽ͘ϭ;^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ&ƌĂŵĞͿϲ ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞWůĂŶEŽ͘Ϯ;h^ϭϬϭ&ƌĂŵĞͿϳ ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞWůĂŶEŽ͘ϯ;^ƚĂĐŬĞĚZĂŵƉ^ƚƌƵĐƚƵƌĞͿϴ ĞĐŬŽŶƚŽƵƌƐEŽ͘ϭϵ ĞĐŬŽŶƚŽƵƌƐEŽ͘Ϯ ϭϬ ĞĐŬŽŶƚŽƵƌƐEŽ͘ϯϭϭ &ŽƵŶĚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶϭϮ ďƵƚŵĞŶƚϭ>ĂǇŽƵƚ;^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ&ƌĂŵĞͿϭϯ ďƵƚŵĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐ;^ǇĐĂŵŽƌĞƌĞĞŬ&ƌĂŵĞͿϭϰ ĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϭ;ĞŶƚϮƚŚƌŽƵŐŚϳ͕h^ϭϬϭ/ŶƚĞƌŝŽƌƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐͿ ϭϱ ĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘Ϯ;ĞŶƚϮƚŚƌŽƵŐŚϳ͕h^ϭϬϭ/ŶƚĞƌŝŽƌƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐͿ ϭϲ ĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϯ;ĞŶƚϮƚŚƌŽƵŐŚϳ͕h^ϭϬϭ/ŶƚĞƌŝŽƌƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐͿ ϭϳ ĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϰ;ĞŶƚϮƚŚƌŽƵŐŚϳ͕h^ϭϬϭ/ŶƚĞƌŝŽƌƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐͿ ϭϴ ĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϱ;ĞŶƚϴĂƉΘ,ŝŶŐĞĞƚĂŝůƐͿϭϵ ĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϲ;ĞŶƚϴĂƉΘ,ŝŶŐĞĞƚĂŝůƐͿϮϬ ĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϳ;h^ϭϬϭEŽƌƚŚĞŶƚĂƉΘ,ŝŶŐĞĞƚĂŝůƐͿϮϭ ĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϴ;h^ϭϬϭEŽƌƚŚĞŶƚĂƉΘ,ŝŶŐĞĞƚĂŝůƐͿϮϮ ĞĂƌŝŶŐĞƚĂŝůƐϮϯ dǇƉŝĐĂů^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϮϰ 'ŝƌĚĞƌ>ĂǇŽƵƚEŽ͘ϭϮϱ 'ŝƌĚĞƌ>ĂǇŽƵƚEŽ͘ϮϮϲ WͬWƌĞƚĞŶƐŝŽŶĞĚΗ/ΗŽƌΗhΗ'ŝƌĚĞƌ;ĞďŽŶĚĞĚ^ƚƌĂŶĚƐͿϮϳ WͬWƌĞƚĞŶƐŝŽŶĞĚΗ/ΗŽƌΗhΗ'ŝƌĚĞƌ;DŝƐĐĞůůĂŶĞŽƵƐĞƚĂŝůƐͿϮϴ ŝĂƉŚƌĂŐŵĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϭϮϵ ŝĂƉŚƌĂŐŵĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘Ϯ ATTACHMENT 3
>ŽǁĞƌ
ĂƐƚƐŝĚĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚǇĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶŽƐƚ ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞ
ϯϬ ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůĞĐŬ^ůĂďZĞŝŶĨEŽ͘ϭϯϭ ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůĞĐŬ^ůĂďZĞŝŶĨEŽ͘ϮϯϮ ZĂŵƉĞŶƚ>ĂǇŽƵƚϯϯ ZĂŵƉĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϭϯϰ ZĂŵƉĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘Ϯϯϱ ZĂŵƉĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϯϯϲ ZĂŵƉĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϰϯϳ ZĂŵƉĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϱϯϴ ZĂŵƉĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϲϯϵ ZĂŵƉĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϳϰϬ ZĂŵƉĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϴϰϭ ZĂŵƉĞŶƚĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϵϰϮ ZĂŵƉdǇƉŝĐĂů^ĞĐƚŝŽŶϰϯ ZĂŵƉ^ůĂďĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϭϰϰ ZĂŵƉ^ůĂďĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘Ϯϰϱ ZĂŵƉ^ůĂďĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϯϰϲ ZĂŵƉƉƉƌŽĂĐŚϰϳ ^ƚƌŝƉ:ŽŝŶƚ^ĞĂůƐƐĞŵďůǇDZфϰΗϰϴ :ŽŝŶƚƌŵŽƌWƌŽƚĞĐƚŝŽŶĞƚĂŝů;ĐŽǀĞƌƉůĂƚĞĂƚũŽŝŶƚƐͿϰϵ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘ϭϱϬ ƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůĞƚĂŝůƐEŽ͘Ϯϱϭ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶZĂŝůŝŶŐEŽ͘ϭϱϮ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶZĂŝůŝŶŐEŽ͘Ϯϱϯ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶZĂŝůŝŶŐEŽ͘ϯϱϰ WĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶZĂŝůŝŶŐEŽ͘ϰϱϱ >ŽŐŽĨdĞƐƚŽƌŝŶŐEŽ͘ϭϱϲ >ŽŐŽĨdĞƐƚŽƌŝŶŐEŽ͘Ϯϱϳ >ŽŐŽƌdĞƐƚŽƌŝŶŐEŽ͘ϯ ATTACHMENT 3
>ŽǁĞƌ
ĂƐƚƐŝĚĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇŽŶŶĞĐƚŝǀŝƚǇĐƚŝǀĞdƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶWůĂŶŽƐƚ ƐƚŝŵĂƚĞ
ϱϳƌŝĚŐĞ^ŚĞĞƚƐ;нϭϱйĐŽŶƚŝŶŐĞŶĐǇͿΛϭϬϬŚƌƐͬƐŚĞĞƚ ϲϱϱϱ ŚŽƵƌƐ ϭϵZŽĂĚ^ŚĞĞƚƐ;нϭϱйĐŽŶƚŝŶŐĞŶĐǇͿΛϱϬŚƌƐͬƐŚĞĞƚ ϭϬϵϮ ŚŽƵƌƐ WƌŽũĞĐƚDŐŵƚϭϬй ϳϲϱ ŚŽƵƌƐ
dŽƚĂůWƌŝŵĞ,ŽƵƌƐ ϴϰϭϮ
ǀĞƌĂŐĞZĂƚĞͬŚƌ Ψϭϴϱ͘ϬϬ dŽƚĂůWƌŝŵĞŽŶƐƵůƚĂŶƚ Ψϭ͕ϱϱϲ͕ϭϲϱ ^ƵďƐ

ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂů;
/Z͕WĞƌŵŝƚƐ͕E
WdĞĐŚ^ƚƵĚŝĞƐͿ Ψϯϵϭ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
'ĞŽƚĞĐŚŶŝĐĂů;ϭϭďŽƌŝŶŐƐϱϬƚŽϭϱϬĨĞĞƚ͕ϴWdϭϬϬƚŽϭϱϬĨĞĞƚͿ ΨϯϲϮ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ,ǇĚƌĂƵůŝĐƐ;>,^ĂŶĚ,^Ϳ ΨϭϮϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ^ƵƌǀĞǇ;ĞƌŝĂů>ŝĚĂƌ͕'ƌŽƵŶĚĞŶƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕,ǇĚƌŽ^ĞĐƚŝŽŶƐ͕ĂŶĚWůĂƚƐĂŶĚ>ĞŐĂůƐͿ Ψϲϭ͕ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬ WƵďůŝĐKƵƚƌĞĂĐŚ;ĂƐƐƵŵĞĚͿ ΨϰϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ŝƚǇĞƐŝŐŶDŐŵƚŽƐƚ;ϭϬйĂƐƐƵŵĞĚͿ ΨϮϱϯ͕ϱϲϲ͘ϱ dŽƚĂůĞƐŝŐŶWŚĂƐĞ/ŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŝƚǇdŝŵĞ ΨϮ͕ϳϴϵ͕Ϯϯϭ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ;ΨϳϬϬͬƐƋĨƚďƌŝĚŐĞĐŽƐƚƉůƵƐĂƉƉƌŽĂĐŚǁŽƌŬͿ Ψϭϱ͕ϱϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ
ŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐĂŶĚŝƚǇDŐŵƚŽƐƚ;ϭϱйͿ ΨϮ͕ϯϮϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ ŽŶƚŝŶŐĞŶĐǇ;ϮϬйͿ Ψϯ͕ϭϬϬ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ
dŽƚĂůŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶWŚĂƐĞ/ŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐŝƚǇdŝŵĞ ΨϮϬ͕ϵϮϱ͕ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬ

ƐĐĂůĂƚŝŽŶϱйͬǇĞĂƌ;ĂƐƐƵŵĞĚĞƐŝŐŶďĞŐŝŶƐϮϬϮϱ͕ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶďĞŐŝŶƐϮϬϯϬͿ ΨϯϮ͕ϱϭϴ͕ϳϬϯ͘ϰϳ ĞƐŝŐŶŽƐƚƐ
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶŽƐƚ
dŽƚĂů
ƐĐĂůĂƚĞĚWƌŽũĞĐƚŽƐƚ
ATTACHMENT 3
WW
E/y

dKWK'ZW,/DWW/E'

ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
ATTACHMENT 3
WW
E/y&

Es/ZKED
Ed>^dh/
^

ATTACHMENT 3
September 9, 2022
Greg Young
Quincy Engineering, Inc.
11017 Cobblerock Drive, Suite 100
Rancho Cordova, Ca 95670
Re: Biological Constraints Analysis for the Lower Eastside Pedestrian Bridge Project / SWCA Project No. 73506
SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) prepared this Biological Constraints Analysis (BCA) at the request of the Quincy Engineering (Quincy) and the City of Santa Barbara (City) with the purpose of identifying potential constraints and environmental requirements associated with the Lower Eastside Pedestrian Bridge Project (project), shown in Figure 1. An evaluation of biological resources at the constraints level is intended to help establish the scope and cost estimates for future grant applications and help contribute to the engineering design and feasibility of the project. While multiple designs were initially considered by the engineering team, ultimately only one alternative was evaluated as part of this study, which is shown in Figure 2. Because the design is not final, the results of this report may also assist the team in evaluating potential biological impacts should there be future changes to the alignment or structure or provide supporting biological information for future environmental impact review or permitting tasks.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Within the Lower Eastside neighborhood, pedestrians and bicyclists would access the bridge structure near the intersection of Canada and Pintos streets which would provide connectivity over US 101 and UPRR from an approximate 225’ clear span structure with optional supports within the median of US 101. On the south side of US 101, users would remain elevated as they travel parallel to the parcel boundary of the Santa Barbara Zoo and UPRR right-of-way for approximately 550 feet before crossing Sycamore Creek and conforming to the existing elevation at the Dwight Murphy Field where there would be a crosswalk on Ninos Drive. The elevated structure that runs parallel the zoo would be supported by 5 or 6 piers. Construction of the structure would result in the removal of all landscape trees along the border of the parking lot and non-native eucalyptus trees within Sycamore Creek that are within the alignment.

ATTACHMENT 3
Biological Constraints Analysis
2 Figure 1. Project Vicinity
ATTACHMENT 3
Biological Constraints Analysis
3 Figure 2. Project Location
ATTACHMENT 3
Biological Constraints Analysis
4 METHODOLOGY
Prior to conducting a reconnaissance-level field surveys, SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) performed a literature and database review to determine which sensitive species have been documented within the vicinity of the project. This included a 5-mile radius query of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), CNPS Electronic Inventory, and review of environmental documents that have been prepared for other projects in the general area. SWCA also obtained an unofficial species list from USFWS, which reaffirmed the CNDDB records and augmented the number of species for consideration.

Refer to Attachment A.

The reconnaissance-level field survey was conducted on August 22, 2022, by SWCA Principal Natural Resources Team Lead, Jon Claxton. Mr. Claxton conducted a pedestrian survey of the alignment from public right-of-way, including the Santa Barbara Zoo parking lot. Due to safety constraints, Mr. Claxton did not enter the railroad right-of-way or the channel bed of Sycamore Creek due to resident homeless population. Mr. Claxton did characterize habitat and reviewed tree data from the top of bank. The channel was dry during the time of the survey. See Figure 3.

Existing tree data was collected by the survey team and location and species was verified by SWCA.

Because all the landscape trees within the alignment will be removed, with no neighboring trees that would be affected, an analysis of projected damage of the crucial root zone was not necessary. See Figure

4. No protocol-level surveys for wildlife were conducted as part of the survey, nor were any focused botanical surveys conducted. Regardless, it is very unlikely that any of the regional plant species of concern would occur within the project site due to the very urban and disturbed nature of the project area.

A formal aquatic resources delineation was not conducted; however, the boundaries of the state jurisdiction were mapped since the structure would cross over Sycamore Creek and result in the removal of some riparian vegetation. The pier structures are anticipated to be outside of the channel. No permanent impacts would occur below the Ordinary High-Water Mark.

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Biological Study Area
For the purposes of this report, the Biological Study Area (BSA) included the alignment of the proposed project shown in Figure 2 and subsequent figures. The proposed project is located between the intersection of Canada and Pitos Streets in the Lower Eastside neighborhood and would provide a pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing over the U.S. Highway 101 (US 101) and Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) to the vicinity of Dwight Murphy Field on the south side of US 101. The Santa Barbara Zoo is located along the southern boundary of the proposed project, while Sycamore Creek bisects the project site within the eastern portion of the site.

Due to the linear nature of the project and existing development in the area (railroad, parking lot, roadway), the survey area did not include a buffer surrounding the proposed project alignment.

Equipment and materials for the project would be staged within existing developed areas (parking lots, streets) and would not have impacts beyond the existing conditions.

For the purposes of this report, it is anticipated that the entire extent of the BSA would be physically impacted by the construction activities of the proposed permanent structure.

ATTACHMENT 3
Biological Constraints Analysis
5 Soil Conditions
Based on a review of the Web Soil Survey (USGS 2022), the native substrate within the project site is Camarillo fine sandy loam. This soil is poorly drained in areas of frequent flooding. Within the project site, this soil is covered by overburden primarily because of construction of the UPRR, U.S. 101, and Santa Barbara Zoo. The most intact native soils are located within Sycamore Creek, which are subject to flooding during storm events from upper reaches in the watershed and storm water drainage systems.

Soils within the channel are comprised of sediments that have been transported from these upper watershed areas and localized runoff.

Hydrology
Sycamore Creek bisects the pedestrian and bicycle structure within the western portion of the project site.

Sycamore Creek is one of four major watersheds within Santa Barbara, which originate on the south face of the Santa Ynez Mountains and convey urbanized stormwater runoff from the city. Within the project area, the hydrology of the creek is dry during most years and only flows during periods of rainfall.

However, the channel may flow year around during periods of high rainfall events.

Habitat Connectivity
The California Essential Habitat Connectivity Project was queried for Essential Habitat Connectivity, which are the best available data describing important areas for maintaining connectivity between large blocks of land for wildlife corridor purposes (CDFW 2010). These important areas are referred to as Essential Connectivity Areas (ECA). ECAs are only intended to be a broad scale representation of areas that provide essential connectivity.

The BSA does not fall within an Essential Connectivity Area. It is expected that additional linkages will be identified as new data becomes available for various species. For the purposes of this analysis, it is reasonable to assume that the riparian corridor within the project site may be used by wildlife as movement corridors on a smaller scale. Sycamore Creek riparian corridor provides habitat for many anadromous and estuarine species including steelhead and tidewater goby. There are no known fish passage barriers located within the BSA based on a review of the CDFW Fish Passage database.

ATTACHMENT 3
Biological Constraints Analysis
6 Figure 3. Habitat Map
ATTACHMENT 3
Biological Constraints Analysis
7 Figure 4. Tree Survey
ATTACHMENT 3
Biological Constraints Analysis
8 REGIONAL BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF CONCERN
Sensitive Habitats and Natural Communities of Concern
The portion of Sycamore Creek in the project area falls within designated critical habitat for the Southern California steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Distinct Population Segment (DPS). Sycamore Creek also provides habitat for the endangered tidewater goby (Eucyclogobius newberryi), but the creek is not considered to be critical habitat for this species. Lastly, this portion of Sycamore Creek is within the Coastal Zone and considered an Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Area (ESHA) under the Local Coastal Plan.

No wetland features appear to be present below OHWM within this segment of the creek. However, below the Ordinary High-Water Mark (OHWM), Sycamore Creek would be considered “waters of the U.S.” and protected by the Clean Water Act. The entire channel from top of bank, or furthest extent of riparian habitat would be considered protected by California Fish and Game Code, as well as the PorterCologne Water Quality Act.

Plant Species of Concern
The USFWS, CNDDB, and CRPR species lists indicate 14 special-status plant taxa (federally listed, state listed, and/or CRPR List 1B, 2, or 4) as occurring within a 5-mile radius of the project site. An analysis of the range and habitat preferences was conducted to identify which special-status plant species have the potential to occur within the BSA. The analysis considered existing habitat, elevation, results of previous surveys conducted for other projects, and soils within the BSA. As a result, SWCA determined it is unlikely that the BSA supports suitable habitat for any of the 14 special-status plant species.

Wildlife of Concern
The USFWS, CNDDB species lists indicate 24 special-status wildlife taxa (federally listed and/or state listed) as occurring within a 5-mile radius of the project site (Refer to Attachment A). This list of species is considered regional; therefore, an analysis of the range and habitat preferences was conducted to identify which special-status wildlife species have the potential to occur within the BSA. This list is not intended to be inclusive of all nesting migratory species that may occur in the area, since numerous species of birds with potential for occurrence in the BSA that are protected by the MBTA and CFG Code Sections 3503 and 3503.5.

RESULTS: DISCUSSION OF IMPACTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Sensitive Habitat and Natural Communities of Concern
Based on the current alignment and proposed design, no permanent impacts would occur within the channel of Sycamore Creek. Abutments or piers required for spanning the structure over the creek would be placed outside of the riparian habitat to the furthest extent possible to avoid permanent impacts of riparian habitat, and to avoid impeding flow to the channel in a high flow event. However, placement of the structure over the channel would result in degradation of the habitat by the removal of non-native eucalyptus trees and understory. Any removal to the riparian channel, including removal of non-native eucalyptus trees would be considered an impact to state jurisdictional features, which are regulated by California Department of Fish, Wildlife and Regional Water Quality Control Board and California Coastal Commission. Final project plans would need to include a conceptual habitat mitigation and monitoring plan to be included in the permit packages to these affected agencies. No permanent impacts ATTACHMENT 3
Biological Constraints Analysis
9 would occur below the Ordinary High-Water Mark; therefore, no permanent impacts are anticipated to occur to federal jurisdictional features. There will likely be foot traffic in the channel during construction, but impacts would be temporary and not result in loss of vegetation. However, because this channel is federally designated as critical habitat by the National Marine Fisheries Services early coordination with this agency is recommended.

Plant Species of Concern
While no sensitive plant species are expected to occur within the BSA; it is recommended for the purposes of CEQA that a spring focused botanical survey be conducted to ensure the presence/absence determination of sensitive species. Should a focused sensitive botanical survey not be feasible prior to CEQA, appropriate mitigation measures should be included within the environmental document that provide specific measures to conduct a focused botanical survey at a later date and include specific measures to mitigation the impact should one be identified, that cannot be avoided.

Wildlife of Concern
It is anticipated that the required permits and approvals from CDFW and RWQCB would not allow for construction of the proposed project over Sycamore Creek during the rainy season (October 16 to May 31); however, should there be a significant rainy season which results in water being present within the channel during the months of June 1 to October 15, there is a potential for Southern California steelhead or tidewater goby to occur within the channel. While this is unlikely, the avoidance of any activity below the Ordinary High-Water Mark or along the banks of the channel would result in no effect to these aquatic species. Final project plans would have appropriate measures included to further reduce the potential for any inadvertent impacts from construction of the structure, piers, or abutments.

Nesting birds are anticipated within Sycamore Creek, and along the landscaped trees planted between the Santa Barbara Zoo and UPRR. The proposed project would remove vegetation along the alignment to construct the proposed project. It is recommended that the removal of this vegetation occur outside of the typical nesting season which is recognized as February 1 to September 1. Removal outside of the typical nesting season will reduce the probability of any nesting impacts. However, it is recommended that even tree removal outside of the nesting season should be surveyed by a qualified biologist prior to removal to ensure no late, or early, nesting activities are present.

Lastly, based on the reconnaissance-level survey, eucalyptus within the BSA do not provide sufficient density to provide overwintering habitat for monarch butterfly. This observation was further supported by the absence of any overwintering habitat documented by the Xerces Society, Map of Overwintering Sites (www.westernmonarchcount.org). Therefore, it is anticipated there would be no effect to this species.

DISCUSSION: ANTICIPATED DOCUMENTATION AND PERMITTING
Regarding anticipated documentation and permitting tasks going forward, it is expected that a separate standalone Biological Resources Assessment would be applicable. The report would support the future analysis within the Biological Resources section of the CEQA document and provide necessary information for state permitting with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Regional Water Quality Control Board and California Coastal Commission. Should federal funding be available to the project, or impacts affect the channel below the Ordinary High-Water Mark, it is also anticipated that the project may require a Biological Assessment to only address federal species and obtain federal approvals through Section 7 Endangered Species Consultation. If the federal funds are administered by Caltrans under NEPA delegation, it can also be expected that the Biological Resources Assessment may need to be ATTACHMENT 3
Biological Constraints Analysis
10 converted to a Natural Environment Study report, following the most recent guidance provided within the Standard Environmental Reference maintained by Caltrans.

Should you have any questions regarding this Memo, please contact me at (805) 543-7032 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Jon Claxton, Principal Natural Resources Team Leader
Attachments

REFERENCES CITED
California Fish Passage Analysis Database (CalFish). 2022. California Fish Passage Analysis Database.

Available at:
http://www.calfish.org/ProgramsData/HabitatandBarriers/CaliforniaFishPassageAssessmentData base.aspx. Accessed September 2022.

California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2022. California Native Plant Society online inventory of rare and endangered plants. Available at: http://www.rareplants.cnps.org. Accessed September 2022.

California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB). 2022. Rarefind5 data output for Santa Barbara, California USGS 7.5-minute quadrangle. California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Sacramento, California.

Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2022. Web Soil Survey Results. Available at:
http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm. Accessed September 2022.

United States Fish and Wildlife (USFWS). 2022. The Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPaC).

Available at: https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. Accessed September 2022.

ATTACHMENT 3

ATTACHMENT A
CNDDB and USFWS Database Output
ATTACHMENT 3
A-1

CALIFORNIA NATURAL DIVERSITY DATABASE
ATTACHMENT 3
A-2

ATTACHMENT 3
A-3

UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE IPAC
ATTACHMENT 3
A-4
ATTACHMENT 3
A-5
ATTACHMENT 3
A-6
ATTACHMENT 3
A-7
ATTACHMENT 3
A-8
ATTACHMENT 3
A-9
ATTACHMENT 3
A-10
ATTACHMENT 3
A-11
ATTACHMENT 3
A-12
ATTACHMENT 3
A-13
ATTACHMENT 3
A-14
ATTACHMENT 3
A-15
ATTACHMENT 3
A-16
ATTACHMENT 3
A-17
ATTACHMENT 3
A-18
ATTACHMENT 3
A-19
ATTACHMENT 3
B-1

ATTACHMENT B
Site Photographs
ATTACHMENT 3
B-1
Photo 1: View of alignment across Sycamore Creek between outhouse and eucalyptus tree in background.

Photo 2: View of eucalypus on eastern bank of Sycamore Creek, in corner of zoo parking lot.

ATTACHMENT 3
B-2
Photo 3: Landscape planted trees on property boundary of zoo property and UPRR.

Photo 4: Photo of landscaped trees in western portion of parking lot. Location is approximate to crossing.

ATTACHMENT 3

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
To:

CC:

Greg Young
&RQVRU
11017 Cobblerock Drive, Suite 100
Rancho Cordova, Ca 95670
Jon Claxton, Project Manager, SWCA Environmental Consultants From:

Date:

Leroy Laurie, Cultural Resources Team Lead
1RYHPEHU 3, 2022
Re: Cultural Resources Review of the Lower Eastside Pedestrian Bridge Project / SWCA Project No. 73506
SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) prepared this cultural resources review at the request of the Quincy Engineering (Quincy) and the City of Santa Barbara (City) with the purpose of identifying potential constraints and environmental requirements associated with the Lower Eastside Pedestrian Bridge Project (project).

SWCA received the cultural resources records search results on August 29, 2022, from the Central Coast Information Center (CCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS). The records search included all resource and prior study records within the project area. The records search revealed that 21 prior cultural resources studies overlap with the project area. These include archaeological (survey and Extended Phase I) and historic resource studies. Although none addressed the entirety of the proposed project area, the combined coverage of the 21 studies encompasses 100 percent of the project area. The records search also revealed that one resource, P-40-40061 overlaps with a portion of the project area. Resource P-40-40061 was an early Chumash occupation site, later developed into the historic Child Estate, which burned down in 1959. The most recent studies included in the records search were associated with various projects at the Santa Barbara Zoological Gardens.

Because the project overlaps with a previously documented prehistoric and historic resource, as with prior projects in the immediate vicinity, additional cultural resources study will likely be required. If federal funds are acquired for the project, then the full suite of National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 cultural resources studies may be required for the project. These, along with tribal engagement and consultation, could include, but are not limited to:
x Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR): If the project is subject to Caltrans’s Standard Environmental Review, the overarching HPSR may be required. x Archaeological Survey Report (ASR) or Phase I Archaeological Survey Report ATTACHMENT 3
Lower Eastside Cultural Resources Review
2 x Historic Resources Evaluation Report (HRER), if built environment resource may be directly or indirectly affected by the project.
x Extended Phase I Study, if the results of the ASR warrant further identification efforts. x Phase II Evaluation or Phase III Data Recovery, if archaeological resources that are (or may be) significant cannot be avoided by the project.
x Finding of Effect, in the event that a significant resource is present. x Environmentally Sensitive Area Action Plan, if resources requiring avoidance during construction are present.
x Memorandum of Understanding, as needed.

The scope, scale, and type of reporting will be dependent on the lead federal agency. Additional or supplemental studies and/or project conditions may be required as a result of the City’s review of the project as it relates to their obligations under the California Environmental Quality Act.

ATTACHMENT 3
/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO ([KLELW$
3UHOLPLQDU\(QYLURQPHQWDO6WXG\
3(6
)RUP
(;+,%,7$ 35(/,0,1$5<(19,5210(17$/678'<
3(6

)HGHUDO3URMHFW1R
)LQDO'HVLJQ

)HGHUDO3URJUDP3UHIL[3URMHFW1R$JUHHPHQW1R

([SHFWHG6WDUW'DWH

7R

'LVWULFW/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH(QJLQHHU

)URP

/RFDO$JHQF\

'LVWULFW

3URMHFW 0DQDJHU¶V 1DPH DQG 7HOHSKRQH 1R

$GGUHVV

$GGUHVV

(PDLO$GGUHVV

(PDLO$GGUHVV

,VWKLV3URMHFW³21´WKH <HV ,)<(66723+(5(DQGFRQWDFWWKH'LVWULFW/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH(QJLQHHU 6WDWH+LJKZD\6\VWHP" 1R UHJDUGLQJWKHFRPSOHWLRQRIRWKHUHQYLURQPHQWDOGRFXPHQWDWLRQ )HGHUDO6WDWH7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ,PSURYHPHQW
3URJUDP
)67,3

&XUUHQWO\$GRSWHG3ODQ'DWH

3DJH1RBBBDWWDFKWRWKLVIRUP

KWWSV
GRWFDJRYSURJUDPVILQDQFLDOSURJUDPPLQJRIILFHRIIHGHUDOSURJUDPPLQJGDWDPDQDJHPHQWRISGP 3URJUDPPLQJ 3UHOLPLQDU\(QJLQHHULQJ
IRU)67,3

)LVFDO<HDU

'ROODUV

5LJKWRI:D\

)LVFDO<HDU

'ROODUV

&RQVWUXFWLRQ

)LVFDO<HDU

'ROODUV

3URMHFW'HVFULSWLRQDV6KRZQLQ573DQG)67,3

&RQWLQXH GHVFULSWLRQ RQ ³1RWHV´ VKHHW ODVW SDJH RI WKLV ([KLELW LI QHFHVVDU\

3UHOLPLQDU\'HVLJQ,QIRUPDWLRQ

'RHVWKHSURMHFWLQYROYHDQ\RIWKHIROORZLQJ" 3OHDVHFKHFNWKHDSSURSULDWHER[HVDQGGHOLQHDWHRQDQDWWDFKHGPDS SODQRUOD\RXWLQFOXGLQJDQ\DGGLWLRQDOSHUWLQHQWLQIRUPDWLRQ <HV 1R <HV 1R <HV 1R
*URXQGGLVWXUEDQFH (DVHPHQWV
5RDGFXWILOO (TXLSPHQWVWDJLQJ
([FDYDWLRQ
DQWLFLSDWHG 7HPSRUDU\DFFHVVURDGGHWRXU
PD[LPXPGHSWK 8WLOLW\UHORFDWLRQ
5LJKWRIZD\DFTXLVLWLRQ
'UDLQDJHFXOYHUWV
LI\HVDWWDFKPDSZLWK$31

)ORRGLQJSURWHFWLRQ
6WUHDPFKDQQHOZRUN 'LVSRVDOERUURZVLWHV
3LOHGULYLQJ 3DUWRIODUJHUDGMDFHQWSURMHFW
:LGHQH[LVWLQJURDGZD\
,QFUHDVHQXPEHURIWKURXJKODQHV
1HZDOLJQPHQW
&DSDFLW\LQFUHDVLQJ²RWKHU

HJFKDQQHOL]DWLRQ

5HDOLJQPHQW
5DPSRUVWUHHWFORVXUH
%ULGJHZRUN
9HJHWDWLRQUHPRYDO
7UHHUHPRYDO 'HPROLWLRQ 5DLOURDG
3DJHRI
-DQXDU\
'HWDLOHG3URMHFW'HVFULSWLRQ

'HVFULEHWKHIROORZLQJDVDSSOLFDEOH
SXUSRVHDQGQHHGSURMHFWORFDWLRQDQGOLPLWVUHTXLUHGULJKWRIZD\ DFTXLVLWLRQSURSRVHGIDFLOLWLHVVWDJLQJDUHDVGLVSRVDODQGERUURZVLWHVFRQVWUXFWLRQDFWLYLWLHVDQGFRQVWUXFWLRQDFFHVV
7KH/RZHU(DVWVLGH3HGHVWULDQ%LF\FOH%ULGJHSURMHFWZLOOFRQVWUXFWDQHZSHGHVWULDQELF\FOHEULGJHWRSURYLGHFRQQHFWLYLW\RYHU 86DQG8355IRUWKH&LW\RI6DQWD%DUEDUD
V/RZHU(DVWVLGHQHLJKERUKRRG7KHSURSRVHGEULGJHZRXOGEHDQDSSUR[LPDWH
FOHDUVSDQVWUXFWXUHZLWKRSWLRQDOVXSSRUWVZLWKLQWKHPHGLDQRI86RQWKHVRXWKVLGHRI86XVHUVZRXOGUHPDLQRQ DQHOHYDWHGVWUXFWXUHDVWKH\WUDYHOSDUDOOHOWRWKHSDUFHOERXQGDU\RIWKH6DQWD%DUEDUD=RRDQG8355ULJKWRIZD\IRU DSSUR[LPDWHO\IHHWEHIRUHFURVVLQJ6\FDPRUH&UHHNDQGFRQIRUPLQJWRWKHH[LVWLQJHOHYDWLRQDW'ZLJKW0XUSK\)LOHGZKHUH WKHUHZRXOGEHDFURVVZDONRQ1LQRV'ULYH
7KHSURMHFWLVQRWVKRZQLQWKHFXUUHQW)67,3RUWKH573 N/A
✔
✔ ✔ ✔
✔ ✔ ✔
✔ ✔ ✔
✔ ✔
✔
✔
✔ ✔
✔ ✔ ✔
✔
✔ ✔
✔
✔ ✔ ✔
ATTACHMENT 3
/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO ([KLELW$
3UHOLPLQDU\(QYLURQPHQWDO6WXG\
3(6
)RUP
5HTXLUHG$WWDFKPHQWV

5HJLRQDOPDS 3URMHFWORFDWLRQPDS 3URMHFWIRRWSULQWPDS H[LVWLQJSURSRVHGULJKWRIZD\

(QJLQHHULQJGUDZLQJV
H[LVWLQJDQGSURSRVHGFURVVVHFWLRQV
LIDYDLODEOH %RUURZGLVSRVDOVLWHORFDWLRQPDSLIDSSOLFDEOH

1RWH
DOOPDSV
H[FHSWSURMHFWORFDWLRQPDSDQGUHJLRQDOPDSV
VKRXOGEHFRQVLVWHQWZLWKWKHSURMHFWGHVFULSWLRQ
PLQLPXPVFDOH

*HR7UDFNHU3ULQWRXWIRU+D]DUGRXV0DWHULDOV
KWWS
JHRWUDFNHUZDWHUERDUGVFDJRY

)HGHUDO7KUHDWHQHGDQG(QGDQJHUHG6SHFLHV/LVWIURP86):6 KWWS
HFRVIZVJRYLSDF

)HGHUDO7KUHDWHQHGDQG(QGDQJHUHG6SHFLHV/LVWIURP10)6

KWWSV
ZZZZHVWFRDVWILVKHULHVQRDDJRYPDSVBGDWDFDOLIRUQLDBVSHFLHVBOLVWBWRROVKWPO
&XUUHQW3KRWRVRI3URMHFW6LWH )(0$PDS 9,$4XHVWLRQQDLUH ([DPLQHWKHSURMHFWIRUSRWHQWLDOHIIHFWVRQWKHHQYLURQPHQWGLUHFWRULQGLUHFWDQGDQVZHUWKHIROORZLQJTXHVWLRQV 7KH³FRQVWUXFWLRQDUHD´ DV VSHFLILHGEHORZ LQFOXGHV DOODUHDV RI JURXQGGLVWXUEDQFHDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKHSURMHFW LQFOXGLQJVWDJLQJDQGVWRFNSLOLQJDUHDVDQGWHPSRUDU\DFFHVVURDGV (DFKDQVZHUPXVWEHEULHIO\ GRFXPHQWHGRQWKH³1RWHV´ SDJHVDW WKHHQGRI WKH3(6)RUP $ 3RWHQWLDO(QYLURQPHQWDO(IIHFWV <HV 7R%H 1R
'HWHUPLQHG
*HQHUDO
:LOOWKHSURMHFWUHTXLUHIXWXUHFRQVWUXFWLRQWRIXOO\XWLOL]HWKHGHVLJQFDSDELOLWLHVLQFOXGHGLQWKH SURSRVHGSURMHFW"
:LOOWKHSURMHFWJHQHUDWHSXEOLFFRQWURYHUV\"
1RLVH
,VWKHSURMHFWD7\SH,SURMHFWDVGHILQHGLQ&)5 K

³FRQVWUXFWLRQRQQHZORFDWLRQRUWKH
SK\VLFDODOWHUDWLRQRIDQH[LVWLQJKLJKZD\ZKLFKVLJQLILFDQWO\FKDQJHVHLWKHUWKHKRUL]RQWDORU YHUWLFDODOLJQPHQWRULQFUHDVHVWKHQXPEHURIWKURXJKWUDIILFODQHV´" 'RHVWKHSURMHFWKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOIRUDGYHUVHFRQVWUXFWLRQUHODWHGQRLVHLPSDFW

VXFKDVUHODWHGWRSLOHGULYLQJ
"
$LU4XDOLW\
,VWKHSURMHFWLQD1$$46QRQDWWDLQPHQWRUPDLQWHQDQFHDUHD" ,VWKHSURMHFWH[HPSWIURPWKHUHTXLUHPHQWWKDWDFRQIRUPLW\GHWHUPLQDWLRQEHPDGH" ,I³<HV´VWDWH
ZKLFKFRQIRUPLW\H[HPSWLRQSHU&)5
RU&)5

FKHFNRQHER[EHORZDQGLGHQWLI\WKHSURMHFWW\SHLIDSSOLFDEOH

&)5
3URMHFWW\SH

&5)

,VWKHSURMHFWH[HPSWIURPUHJLRQDOFRQIRUPLW\"
,I³<HV´VWDWHZKLFKFRQIRUPLW\H[HPSWLRQLQ
&)5
7DEOHDSSOLHV

,ISURMHFWLVQRWH[HPSWIURPUHJLRQDOFRQIRUPLW\
,I³1R´RQ4XHVWLRQ

,VSURMHFWLQDPHWURSROLWDQQRQDWWDLQPHQWPDLQWHQDQFHDUHD" ,V SURMHFWLQDQLVRODWHGUXUDOQRQDWWDLQPHQWDUHD"
,VSURMHFWLQD&230DQGRU30QRQDWWDLQPHQWPDLQWHQDQFHDUHD" +D]DUGRXV0DWHULDOV+D]DUGRXV:DVWH

,VWKHUHSRWHQWLDOIRUKD]DUGRXVPDWHULDOV
LQFOXGLQJXQGHUJURXQGRUDERYHJURXQGWDQNVHWF
RU
KD]DUGRXVZDVWH
LQFOXGLQJRLOZDWHUVHSDUDWRUVZDVWHRLODVEHVWRVFRQWDLQLQJPDWHULDOOHDGEDVHG SDLQW$'/HWF
ZLWKLQRULPPHGLDWHO\DGMDFHQWWRWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQDUHD" :DWHU4XDOLW\5HVRXUFHV
'RHVWKHSURMHFWKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOWRLPSDFWZDWHUUHVRXUFHV ULYHUVVWUHDPVED\VLQOHWVODNHV
GUDLQDJHVORXJKV
ZLWKLQRULPPHGLDWHO\DGMDFHQWWRWKHSURMHFWDUHD"
,VWKHSURMHFWZLWKLQDGHVLJQDWHGVROHVRXUFHDTXLIHU" 3DJHRI
-DQXDU\
✔ ✔ ✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
ATTACHMENT 3
/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO ([KLELW$
3UHOLPLQDU\(QYLURQPHQWDO6WXG\
3(6
)RUP
&RDVWDO=RQH
,VWKHSURMHFWZLWKLQWKH6WDWH&RDVWDO=RQH6DQ)UDQFLVFR%D\RU6XLVXQ0DUVK" )ORRGSODLQ
,VWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQDUHDORFDWHGZLWKLQDUHJXODWRU\IORRGZD\RUZLWKLQWKHEDVHIORRGSODLQ \HDU

HOHYDWLRQRIDZDWHUFRXUVHRUODNH"
:LOGDQG6FHQLF5LYHUV
,VWKHSURMHFWZLWKLQRULPPHGLDWHO\DGMDFHQWWRD:LOGDQG6FHQLF5LYHU6\VWHP" %LRORJLFDO5HVRXUFHV
,VWKHUHDSRWHQWLDOIRUIHGHUDOO\OLVWHGWKUHDWHQHGRUHQGDQJHUHGVSHFLHVRUWKHLUFULWLFDOKDELWDWRU HVVHQWLDOILVKKDELWDWWRRFFXUZLWKLQRUDGMDFHQWWRWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQDUHD" 'RHVWKHSURMHFWKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOWRGLUHFWO\RULQGLUHFWO\DIIHFWPLJUDWRU\ELUGVRUWKHLUQHVWVRU HJJV
VXFKDVYHJHWDWLRQUHPRYDOER[FXOYHUWUHSODFHPHQWUHSDLUEULGJHZRUNHWF "
,VWKHUHDSRWHQWLDOIRUZHWODQGVWRRFFXUZLWKLQRUDGMDFHQWWRWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQDUHD" ,VWKHUHDSRWHQWLDOIRUDJULFXOWXUDOZHWODQGVWRRFFXUZLWKLQRUDGMDFHQWWRWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQDUHD"
,VWKHUHDSRWHQWLDOIRUWKHLQWURGXFWLRQRUVSUHDGRILQYDVLYHSODQWVSHFLHV" 6HFWLRQV
I
DQG
I

$UHWKHUHDQ\KLVWRULFVLWHVRUSXEOLFO\RZQHGSXEOLFSDUNVUHFUHDWLRQDUHDVZLOGOLIHRUZDWHUIRZO UHIXJHV
6HFWLRQ>I@
ZLWKLQRULPPHGLDWHO\DGMDFHQWWRWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQDUHD" 'RHVWKHSURMHFWKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOWRDIIHFWSURSHUWLHVDFTXLUHGRULPSURYHGZLWK/DQGDQG:DWHU &RQVHUYDWLRQ)XQG$FW
6HFWLRQ>I@
IXQGV"
9LVXDO5HVRXUFHV
'RHVWKHSURMHFWKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOWRDIIHFWDQ\YLVXDORUVFHQLFUHVRXUFHV" 5HORFDWLRQ,PSDFWV
:LOOWKHSURMHFWUHTXLUHWKHUHORFDWLRQRIUHVLGHQWLDORUEXVLQHVVSURSHUWLHV"

,IWKHDQVZHUWRTXHVWLRQVLV³\HV´WKHQ7LWOH9,,PSOHPHQWDWLRQDQGRXWUHDFKPD\EHWULJJHUHG

/DQG8VH&RPPXQLW\DQG)DUPODQG,PSDFWV
:LOOWKHSURMHFWUHTXLUHDQ\ULJKWRIZD\LQFOXGLQJSDUWLDORUIXOOWDNHV" &RQVLGHUFRQVWUXFWLRQ HDVHPHQWVDQGXWLOLW\UHORFDWLRQV
,VWKHSURMHFWLQFRQVLVWHQWZLWKSODQVDQGJRDOVDGRSWHGE\WKHFRPPXQLW\" 'RHVWKHSURMHFWKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOWRGLYLGHRUGLVUXSWQHLJKERUKRRGVFRPPXQLWLHV" 'RHVWKHSURMHFWKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOWRGLVSURSRUWLRQDWHO\DIIHFWORZLQFRPHDQGPLQRULW\ SRSXODWLRQV"
:LOOWKHSURMHFWUHTXLUHWKHUHORFDWLRQRISXEOLFXWLOLWLHV"
:LOOWKHSURMHFWDIIHFWDFFHVVWRSURSHUWLHVRUURDGZD\V" :LOOWKHSURMHFWLQYROYHFKDQJHVLQDFFHVVFRQWUROWRWKH6WDWH+LJKZD\6\VWHP 6+6
"
:LOOWKHSURMHFWLQYROYHWKHXVHRIDWHPSRUDU\URDGGHWRXURUUDPSFORVXUH" :LOOWKHSURMHFWUHGXFHDYDLODEOHSDUNLQJ"
:LOOWKHSURMHFWFRQVWUXFWLRQHQFURDFKRQVWDWHRUIHGHUDOODQGV" :LOOWKHSURMHFWFRQYHUWDQ\IDUPODQGWRDGLIIHUHQWXVHRULPSDFWDQ\IDUPODQGV" &XOWXUDO5HVRXUFHV
,VWKHUH1DWLRQDO5HJLVWHUOLVWHGRUSRWHQWLDOO\HOLJLEOHKLVWRULFSURSHUWLHVRUDUFKDHRORJLFDO UHVRXUFHVZLWKLQRULPPHGLDWHO\DGMDFHQWWRWKHFRQVWUXFWLRQDUHD"

1RWH
&DOWUDQV346DQVZHUVTXHVWLRQ

,VWKHSURMHFWDGMDFHQWWRRUZRXOGLWHQFURDFKRQ7ULEDOODQG" 3DJHRI
-DQXDU\
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
ATTACHMENT 3
/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO ([KLELW$
3UHOLPLQDU$QYLURQPHQWDO6WXG\
3(6
)RUP
)RU6HFWLRQV%&DQG'FKHFNDSSURSULDWHER[WRLQGLFDWHUHTXLUHGWHFKQLFDOVWXGLHVFRRUGLQDWLRQSHUPLWVRUDSSURYDOV % 5HTXLUHG7HFKQLFDO6WXGLHV
DQG$QDO\VHV
& &RRUGLQDWLRQ ' $QWLFLSDWHG
$FWLRQV3HUPLWV$SSURYDOV
7UDIILF
&KHFNRQH

7UDIILF6WXG\ &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
7HFKQLFDO0HPRUDQGXP &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
'LVFXVVLRQLQ('2QO\ &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
1RLVH
&KHFNDVDSSOLFDEOH

7UDIILF5HODWHG
&RQVWUXFWLRQ5HODWHG
&KHFNRQH

1RLVH6WXG\5HSRUW &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
1$'5 &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
7HFKQLFDO0HPRUDQGXP &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
'LVFXVVLRQLQ('2QO\ &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
$LU4XDOLW\
&KHFNDVDSSOLFDEOH

7UDIILF5HODWHG
&RQVWUXFWLRQ5HODWHG
&KHFNRQH

$LU4XDOLW\5HSRUW &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
7HFKQLFDO0HPRUDQGXP &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
'LVFXVVLRQLQ('2QO\ &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
)+:$ &RQIRUPLW$LQGLQJ
86& &(V
($V(,6V

&DOWUDQV &RQIRUPLW\)LQGLQJ
86&&(V

5HJLRQDO$JHQF\ 3030,QWHUDJHQF\&RQVXOWDWLRQ
+D]DUGRXV0DWHULDOV
+D]DUGRXV:DVWH
&KHFNDVDSSOLFDEOH

,QLWLDO6LWH$VVHVVPHQW

3KDVH

&DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
3UHOLPLQDU\6LWH$VVHVVPHQW

3KDVH

&DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
'LVFXVVLRQLQ('2QO\ &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
&DO(3$'76& 5HYLHZ'DWDEDVH
/RFDO$JHQF\ 5HYLHZ'DWDEDVH
:DWHU4XDOLW\5HVRXUFHV
&KHFNDVDSSOLFDEOH

:DWHU4XDOLW\$VVHVV5HSRUW &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
7HFKQLFDO0HPRUDQGXP &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
'LVFXVVLRQLQ('2QO\ &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
6ROH6RXUFH$TXLIHU

'LVWULFWVDQG
(3$
6)5HJLRQDO2IILFH
$SSURYDORI$QDO\VLVLQ('
&RDVWDO=RQH &&& &RDVWDO=RQH&RQVLVWHQF\'HWHUPLQDWLRQ 3DJHRI
-DQXDU\
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔ ✔
ATTACHMENT 3
/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO ([KLELW$
3UHOLPLQDU$QYLURQPHQWDO6WXG\
3(6
)RUP
% 5HTXLUHG7HFKQLFDO6WXGLHV
DQG$QDO\VHV
& &RRUGLQDWLRQ ' $QWLFLSDWHG
$FWLRQV3HUPLWV$SSURYDOV
)ORRGSODLQ
&KHFNDVDSSOLFDEOH

/RFDWLRQ+\GUDXOLF6WXG\ &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
)ORRGSODLQ(YDOXDWLRQ5HSRUW &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
6XPPDU$ORRGSODLQ
(QFURDFKPHQW5HSRUW
&DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
&DOWUDQV 2QO\3UDFWLFDEOH$OWHUQDWLYH)LQGLQJ
)+:$ $SSURYHVVLJQLILFDQWHQFURDFKPHQWVDQG
FRQFXUVLQ2QO\3UDFWLFDEOH$OWHUQDWLYH
)LQGLQJV
:LOGDQG6FHQLF5LYHUV
5LYHU0DQDJLQJ$JHQF\ :LOGDQG6FHQLF5LYHUV'HWHUPLQDWLRQ %LRORJLFDO5HVRXUFHV
&KHFNDVDSSOLFDEOH

1(60LQLPDO,PSDFW &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
1(6
%$ &DOWUDQV $SSURYHVIRU&RQVXOWDWLRQ
86):6 6HFWLRQ,QIRUPDO)RUPDO&RQVXOWDWLRQ
12$$)LVKHULHV
()+(YDOXDWLRQ 12$$)LVKHULHV 06$&RQVXOWDWLRQ
%LR$FRXVWLF(YDOXDWLRQ 12$$)LVKHULHV $SSURYDO
7HFKQLFDO0HPRUDQGXP &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
:HWODQGV
&KHFNDVDSSOLFDEOH

:'DQG$VVHVVPHQW &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
$&2( :HWODQG9HULILFDWLRQ
15&6 $JULFXOWXUDO:HWODQG9HULILFDWLRQ
&DOWUDQV :HWODQGV2QO\3UDFWLFDEOH$OWHUQDWLYH
)LQGLQJ
,QYDVLYH3ODQWV
'LVFXVVLRQLQ('2QO\ &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
6HFWLRQ
I

&KHFNDVDSSOLFDEOH

&DOWUDQV 'HWHUPLQH7HPSRUDU\2FFXSDQF\
'HPLQLPLV &DOWUDQV 'HPLQLPLVILQGLQJ
3URJUDPPDWLF
I
(YDOXDWLRQ &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
7\SH
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
,QGLYLGXDO
I
(YDOXDWLRQ &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
$JHQF\ZLWK-XULVGLFWLRQ
6+32
'2,
+8'
86'$
3DJHRI
-DQXDU\
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔ ✔
✔
✔
✔
✔ ✔
✔
✔
ATTACHMENT 3
/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO ([KLELW$
3UHOLPLQDU\(QYLURQPHQWDO6WXG\
3(6
)RUP
% 5HTXLUHG7HFKQLFDO6WXGLHV
DQG$QDO\VHV
& &RRUGLQDWLRQ ' $QWLFLSDWHG
$FWLRQV3HUPLWV$SSURYDOV
6HFWLRQ
I

$JHQF\ZLWK-XULVGLFWLRQ
136 'HWHUPLQHV&RQVLVWHQF\ZLWK/RQJ7HUP
0DQDJHPHQW3ODQ
136 $SSURYHV&RQYHUVLRQ
9LVXDO5HVRXUFHV
7HFKQLFDO &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
0HPRUDQGXP &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
0RGHUDWH9,$ &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
$GYDQFH&RPSOH[9,$ &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
5HORFDWLRQ,PSDFWV
&KHFNRQH

5HORFDWLRQ,PSDFW0HPR &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
5HORFDWLRQ,PSDFW6WXG\ &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
5HORFDWLRQ,PSDFW5HSRUW &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
/DQG8VHDQG
&RPPXQLW\,PSDFWV
&KHFNRQH

&,$ &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
7HFKQLFDO0HPRUDQGXP &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
'LVFXVVLRQLQ('2QO\ &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
&RQVWUXFWLRQ(QFURDFKPHQW
RQ6WDWH/DQGV
&KHFNDVDSSOLFDEOH

6/&-XULVGLFWLRQ 6/& 6/&/HDVH
&DOWUDQV-XULVGLFWLRQ &DOWUDQV (QFURDFKPHQW3HUPLW
63-XULVGLFWLRQ 63 (QFURDFKPHQW3HUPLW
&RQVWUXFWLRQ(QFURDFKPHQW
RQ)HGHUDO/DQGV
)HGHUDO$JHQF\ZLWK
-XULVGLFWLRQ
(QFURDFKPHQW3HUPLW
&RQVWUXFWLRQ(QFURDFKPHQW
2Q,QGLDQ7UXVW/DQGV
%XUHDXRI,QGLDQ$IIDLUV 5LJKWRI:D\3HUPLW
)DUPODQGV
&KHFNRQH

&,$ &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
7HFKQLFDO0HPRUDQGXP &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
'LVFXVVLRQLQ('2QO\ &DOWUDQV $SSURYDO
&KHFNDVDSSOLFDEOH

)RUP$' 15&6 $SSURYHV&RQYHUVLRQ
&'2& $SSURYHV&RQYHUVLRQ
&RQYHUVLRQWR1RQ$JUL8VH $&2(
3DJHRI
-DQXDU\
✔
✔ ✔
✔
✔ ✔ ✔
✔
✔ ✔ ✔
✔
ATTACHMENT 3
/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO ([KLELW$
3UHOLPLQDU\(QYLURQPHQWDO6WXG\
3(6
)RUP
% 5HTXLUHG7HFKQLFDO6WXGLHV
DQG$QDO\VHV
& &RRUGLQDWLRQ ' $QWLFLSDWHG$FWLRQV3HUPLWV
$SSURYDOV
&XOWXUDO5HVRXUFHV

346FRPSOHWHVWKLVVHFWLRQ

&DOWUDQV346 6FUHHQHG8QGHUWDNLQJ
$3(0DS &DOWUDQV346DQG'/$( $SSURYHV$3(0DS
/RFDO3UHVHUYDWLRQ*URXSV
DQGRU1DWLYH$PHULFDQ
7ULEHV
3URYLGHV&RPPHQWV5HJDUGLQJ&RQFHUQV
ZLWK3URMHFW
+365 &DOWUDQV $SSURYHVIRU&RQVXOWDWLRQ
$65
+5(5
)LQGLQJRI(IIHFW5HSRUW &DOWUDQV &RQFXUVRQ1R(IIHFW1R$GYHUVH(IIHFW ZLWK6WDQGDUG&RQGLWLRQV
6+32 /HWWHURI&RQFXUUHQFHRQ(OLJLELOLW\1R
$GYHUVH(IIHFWZLWKRXW6WDQGDUG
02$ &DOWUDQV $SSURYHV02$
6+32 $SSURYHV02$
$&+3
LIUHTXHVWHG
$SSURYHV02$
3HUPLWV
&RSLHVRISHUPLWVDQGDOLVWRI $&2( 6HFWLRQ1DWLRQZLGH3HUPLW PLWLJDWLRQFRPPLWPHQWVDUH $&2( 6HFWLRQ,QGLYLGXDO3HUPLW PDQGDWRU\VXEPLWWDOVIROORZLQJ 1(3$,QWHJUDWLRQ028 1(3$DSSURYDO
&DOWUDQV$&2((3$
86):6
12$$)LVKHULHV
$&2( 5LYHUVDQG+DUERUV$FW6HFWLRQ3HUPLW
86&* 86&*%ULGJH3HUPLW
5:4&% 6HFWLRQ:DWHU4XDOLW\&HUWLILFDWLRQ
&'): 6HFWLRQ6WUHDPEHG$OWHUDWLRQ
$JUHHPHQW
5:4&% 13'(63HUPLW
&&& &RDVWDO=RQH3HUPLW
/RFDO$JHQF\
%&'& %&'&3HUPLW
1RWHV
$GGLWLRQDOVWXGLHVPD\EHUHTXLUHGIRURWKHUIHGHUDODJHQFLHV 3DJHRI
-DQXDU\
✔
✔ ✔
✔ ✔
✔ ✔
✔ ✔
✔ ✔
✔
ATTACHMENT 3
/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO ([KLELW$
3UHOLPLQDU\(QYLURQPHQWDO6WXG\
3(6
)RUP
$&+3 $GYLVRU\&RXQFLORQ+LVWRULF3UHVHUYDWLRQ +5(5 +LVWRULFDO5HVRXUFHV(YDOXDWLRQ5HSRUW $&2( 86$UP\&RUSVRI(QJLQHHUV +8' 86+RXVLQJDQG8UEDQ'HYHORSPHQW $'/ $HULDOO\'HSRVLWHG/HDG 02$ 0HPRUDQGXPRI$JUHHPHQW $3( $UHDRI3RWHQWLDO(IIHFW 06$ 0DJQXVRQ6WHYHQV)LVKHU\&RQVHUYDWLRQDQG $31 $VVHVVRU3DUFHO1XPEHU 0DQDJHPHQW$FW
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
:' :HWODQG'HOLQHDWLRQ
3DJHRI
-DQXDU\
ATTACHMENT 3
/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO ([KLELW$
3UHOLPLQDU\(QYLURQPHQWDO6WXG\
3(6
)RUP
( 3UHOLPLQDU\(QYLURQPHQWDO'RFXPHQW&ODVVLILFDWLRQ
1(3$

%DVHGRQWKHHYDOXDWLRQRIWKHSURMHFWWKHHQYLURQPHQWDOGRFXPHQWWREHGHYHORSHGVKRXOGEH

&KHFNRQH

(QYLURQPHQWDO,PSDFW6WDWHPHQW
1RWH
(QJDJHPHQWZLWKSDUWLFLSDWLQJDJHQFLHVLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWK86& UHTXLUHG

&RPSOLDQFHZLWK86&
UHJDUGLQJ3DUWLFLSDWLQJ$JHQFLHVUHTXLUHG
&RPSOH[(QYLURQPHQWDO$VVHVVPHQW
5RXWLQH(QYLURQPHQWDO$VVHVVPHQW
&DWHJRULFDO([FOXVLRQZLWKRXWUHTXLUHGWHFKQLFDOVWXGLHV &DWHJRULFDO([FOXVLRQZLWKUHTXLUHGWHFKQLFDOVWXGLHV

LI&DWHJRULFDO([FOXVLRQLV VHOHFWHGFKHFNRQHRIWKHIROORZLQJ

6HFWLRQ 86&
&)5DFWLYLW\
F

&)5DFWLYLW\
G

$FWLYLW\ OLVWHGLQWKH6HFWLRQ 86&
6HFWLRQ 86&
) 3XEOLF$YDLODELOLW\DQG3XEOLF+HDULQJ
&KHFNDVDSSOLFDEOH

1RW5HTXLUHG
1RWLFHRI$YDLODELOLW\RI(QYLURQPHQWDO'RFXPHQW
3XEOLF0HHWLQJ
1RWLFHRI2SSRUWXQLW\IRUD3XEOLF+HDULQJ
3XEOLF+HDULQJ5HTXLUHG
* 6LJQDWXUHV
/RFDO$JHQF\6WDIIDQGRU&RQVXOWDQW6LJQDWXUH

6LJQDWXUHRI3UHSDUHU

'DWH

7HOHSKRQH1R

1DPH

/RFDO$JHQF\3URMHFW(QJLQHHU6LJQDWXUH
7KLVGRFXPHQWZDVSUHSDUHGXQGHUP\VXSHUYLVLRQDFFRUGLQJWRWKH/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO([KLELW% ³,QVWUXFWLRQVIRU&RPSOHWLQJWKH3UHOLPLQDU$QYLURQPHQWDO6WXG$RUP´

6LJQDWXUHRI/RFDO$JHQF\

'DWH

7HOHSKRQH1R

3DJH
RI
-DQXDU\
ATTACHMENT 3
/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO ([KLELW$
3UHOLPLQDU\(QYLURQPHQWDO6WXG\
3(6
)RUP
&DOWUDQV'LVWULFW3URIHVVLRQDOO\4XDOLILHG6WDII
346
6LJQDWXUH
3URMHFWGRHVQRWPHHWGHILQLWLRQRIDQ³XQGHUWDNLQJ´
QRIXUWKHUUHYLHZLVQHFHVVDU\XQGHU6HFWLRQ
³1R´6HFWLRQ$

3URMHFWLVOLPLWHGWRWKHW\SHRIDFWLYLW\OLVWHGLQ$WWDFKPHQWRIWKH6HFWLRQ3$DQGEDVHGRQWKHLQIRUPDWLRQ SURYLGHGLQWKH3(6)RUPWKHSURMHFWGRHVQRWKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOWRDIIHFWKLVWRULFSURSHUWLHV ³1R´6HFWLRQ$

3URMHFWLVOLPLWHGWRWKHW\SHRIDFWLYLW\OLVWHGLQ$WWDFKPHQWRIWKH6HFWLRQ3$EXWWKHIROORZLQJDGGLWLRQDO SURFHGXUHVRULQIRUPDWLRQLVQHHGHGWRGHWHUPLQHWKHSRWHQWLDOIRUHIIHFW ³7R%H'HWHUPLQHG´6HFWLRQ$

5HFRUGV6HDUFK
3URMHFWPHHWVWKHGHILQLWLRQRIDQ³XQGHUWDNLQJ´
DOOSURSHUWLHVLQWKHSURMHFWDUHDDUHH[HPSWIURPHYDOXDWLRQSHU $WWDFKPHQWRIWKH6HFWLRQ3$
³1R´6HFWLRQ$

7KHSURSRVHGXQGHUWDNLQJLVFRQVLGHUHGWRKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOWRDIIHFWKLVWRULFSURSHUWLHV IXUWKHUVWXGLHVIRU
FRPSOLDQFHDUHLQGLFDWHGLQ6HFWLRQV%&DQG'RIWKLV3(6)RUP ³<HV´6HFWLRQ$

6LJQDWXUHRI3URIHVVLRQDOO\4XDOLILHG6WDII

'DWH

7HOHSKRQH1R

7KHIROORZLQJVLJQDWXUHVDUHUHTXLUHGIRUDOO&(VURXWLQHDQGFRPSOH[($VDQG(,6V
&DOWUDQV'LVWULFW6HQLRU(QYLURQPHQWDO3ODQQHU
RU'HVLJQHH
DQG'/$(6LJQDWXUHV
,KDYHUHYLHZHGWKLV3UHOLPLQDU\(QYLURQPHQWDO6WXG\
3(6
)RUPDQGGHWHUPLQHGWKDWWKHVXEPLWWDOLVFRPSOHWHDQG VXIILFLHQW ,FRQFXUZLWKWKHVWXGLHVWREHSHUIRUPHGDQGWKHUHFRPPHQGHG1(3$&ODVVRI$FWLRQ

6LJQDWXUHRI6HQLRU(QYLURQPHQWDO3ODQQHURU'HVLJQHH

1DPH

'DWH

7HOHSKRQH1R

6LJQDWXUHRI'LVWULFW/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH(QJLQHHURU'HVLJQHH

1DPH

'DWH

7HOHSKRQH1R

+4'($(QYLURQPHQWDO&RRUGLQDWRUFRQFXUUHQFHBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB (PDLOFRQFXUUHQFHDWWDFKHG

GDWH

3DJHRI
-DQXDU\
ATTACHMENT 3
/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO ([KLELW$
3UHOLPLQDU\(QYLURQPHQWDO6WXG\
3(6
)RUP
3UHOLPLQDU\(QYLURQPHQWDO,QYHVWLJDWLRQ
1RWHVWR6XSSRUWWKH&RQFOXVLRQVRIWKH3(6)RUP

0D\$OVR,QFOXGH&RQWLQXDWLRQRI'HWDLOHG3URMHFW'HVFULSWLRQ

%ULHI([SODQDWLRQRI+RZ3URMHFW&RPSOLHVRU:LOO&RPSO\ZLWK$SSOLFDEOH)HGHUDO0DQGDWH 3DUW$

3DJHRI
-DQXDU\
7KHSURMHFWZLOOFRQVWUXFWDQHZSHGHVWULDQELF\FOHEULGJHVWUXFWXUHRYHUWKHH[LVWLQJ86DQG8355WRFRQQHFW/RZHU (DVWVLGHQHLJKERUKRRGV1RIXWXUHFRQVWUXFWLRQZRXOGEHUHTXLUHGWRIXOO\XWLOL]HWKHSURSRVHGSURMHFW 7KHSRWHQWLDOIRUSXEOLFFRQWURYHUV\LVH[SHFWHGWREHORZ7KHSURMHFWZLOOLPSURYHSHGHVWULDQELF\FOHDFFHVVDQG FRQQHFWLYLW\ZLWKLQWKHH[LVWLQJ/RZHU(DVWVLGHQHLJKERUKRRGV 7KHSURSRVHGGSURMHFWZLOOFRQVWUXFWDQHZSHGHVWULDQELF\FOHEULGJHRYHU86DQG83551RQHZKLJKZD\ODQHVZLOO EHFRQVWUXFWHG
7KHSURMHFWPD\JHQHUDWHFRQVWUXFWLRQQRLVHDVFRQVWUXFWLRQHTXLSPHQWVXFKDVSLOHGULYHUVPD\EHQHFHVVDU\WRFRQVWUXFW WKHSURSRVHGEULGJHVWUXFWXUH
7KHSURMHFWLVORFDWHGLQ6DQWD%DUEDUD&RXQW\ZKLFKGRHVQRWKDYH1$$46QRQDWWDLQPHQWRUPDLQWHQDQFHVWDWXV 6DQWD%DUEDUD&RXQW\LVLQ1$$46DWWDLQPHQW5HJLRQDOFRQIRUPLW\LVQRWUHTXLUHG 6DQWD%DUEDUD&RXQW\LVLQ1$$46DWWDLQPHQW5HJLRQDOFRQIRUPLW\LVQRWUHTXLUHG 6DQWD%DUEDUD&RXQW\LVLQ1$$46DWWDLQPHQW5HJLRQDOFRQIRUPLW\LVQRWUHTXLUHG $UHYLHZRIWKH*HR7UDFNHUGDWDEDVHRQIRXQGQRNQRZQKD]DUGRXVPDWHULDOVLWHVLQWKHLPPHGLDWHSURMHFW YLFLQLW\
7KHSURSRVHGHOHYDWHGSHGHVWULDQELF\FOHEULGJHVWUXFWXUHRYHU86DQG8355ZLOODOVRFURVV6\FDPRUH&UHHNRQ DQHOHYDWHGEULGJHVWUXFWXUH
7KHUHDUHQRVROHVRXUFHDTXLIHUVLQ6DQWD%DUEDUD&RXQW\ KWWS
ZZZHSDJRYUHJLRQ
ZDWHUJURXQGZDWHUVVDKWPO

7KHSURSRVHGSHGHVWULDQELF\FOHEULGJHVWUXFWXUHSURMHFWOLHVZLWKLQWKHERXQGDULHVRIWKH&DOLIRUQLD&RDVWDO=RQHDQG&LW\ RI6DQWD%DUEDUD/RFDO&RDVWDO3ODQ$&RDVWDO'HYHORSPHQW3HUPLWLVUHTXLUHG)HGHUDO&RQVLVWHQF\ZLOOEHUHTXLUHGLI WKHUHLVDIHGHUDOQH[XV
IHGHUDOIXQGVSHUPLWVODQG

7KHSURSRVHGHOHYDWHGSHGHVWULDQEULGJHVWUXFWXUHPXVWFURVV6\FDPRUH&UHHN7KHULVWKHSRWHQWLDOWRDIIHFWGHVLJQDWHGRU EDVHIORRGSODLQV
7KHUHDUHQRGHVLJQDWHG:LOGDQG6FHQLF5LYHUVLQVRXWKHUQ6DQWD%DUEDUD&RXQW\ KWWS
ZZZULYHUVJRYFDOLIRUQLDSKS

6HYHUDO86):610)6&1''%OLVWHGVSHFLHVKDYHEHHQUHFRUGHGLQWKHYLFLQLW\RI6\FDPRUH&UHHN7KHUHLVDORZ SRWHQWLDOIRUSURMHFWUHODWHGLPSDFWV7KHVHUHVRXUFHVZLOOEHIXOO\DGGUHVVHGLQD%LRORJLFDO5HVRXUFH5HSRUW 6:&$
%LRORJLFDO&RQVWUDLQWV$QDO\VLV

&RQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHEULGJHVWUXFWXUHZLOOUHTXLUHUHPRYDORIYHJHWDWLRQZKLFKPD\SURYLGHQHVWLQJDQGIRUDJLQJKDELWDWIRU PLJUDWRU\ELUGVDQGUDSWRUV
6:&$%LRORJLFDO&RQVWUDLQWV$QDO\VLV

7KHUHLVOLNHO\ZHWODQGKDELWDWDVVRFLDWHGZLWK6\FDPRUH&UHHN:HWODQGUHVRXUFHVZLOOEHIXOO\DGGUHVVHGLQD%LRORJLFDO 5HVRXUFHV5HSRUW
6:&$%LRORJLFDO&RQVWUDLQWV$QDO\VLV

7KHUHDUHQRDJULFXOWXUDOZHWODQGVLQWKHSURMHFWDUHD 6:&$%LRORJLFDO&RQVWUDLQWV$QDO\VLV

7KHSURMHFWDUHDKDVGLVWXUEHGDQGQDWLYHSODQWFRPPXQLWLHVDQGOLNHO\VXSSRUWVQRQQDWLYHVSHFLHVWKDWFRXOGEH FRQVLGHUHGLQYDVLYH7KHVHUHVRXUFHVZLOOEHDGGUHVVHGLQD%LRORJLFDO5HVRXUFH5HSRUW 6:&$%LRORJLFDO&RQVWUDLQWV$QDO\VLV

ATTACHMENT 3
/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO ([KLELW$
3UHOLPLQDU$QYLURQPHQWDO6WXG\
3(6
)RUP

&RQWLQXDWLRQRI'HWDLOHG3URMHFW'HVFULSWLRQ

'LVWULEXWLRQ
2ULJLQDO '/$(
/RFDO$JHQF\3URMHFW0DQDJHU
'/$(QYLURQPHQWDO&RRUGLQDWRU

6HQLRU(QYLURQPHQWDO3ODQQHU
RUGHVLJQHH

'LVWULFW346
3DJHRI
-DQXDU\
'ZLJKW0XUSK$LHOGLVDSXEOLFO\RZQHGUHFUHDWLRQDODUHDDQGZRXOGTXDOLI\DVD6HFWLRQ I
UHVRXUFHLIWKHSURMHFW
UHFHLYHVIHGHUDOWUDQVSRUWDWLRQIXQGLQJRURWKHUDSSURYDOV $/DQGDQG:DWHU&RQVHUYDWLRQ)XQI
/:&)
JUDQWZDVXVHGIRUGHYHORSPHQWRI'ZLJKW0XUSK\)LHOGLQ ,IWKH
SURMHFWXVHVODQGIURP'ZLJKW0XUSK\)LHOG6HFWLRQ
I
ZRXOGDSSO\
7KHSURSRVHGSURMHFWZRXOGUHTXLUHWKHUHPRYDORIH[LVWLQJWUHHVDQGWKHEULGJHVWUXFWXUHZRXOGDGGDQDGGLWLRQDOYLVXDO HOHPHQWWRWKHDUHD7KHYLVXDOLPSDFWVZLOOEHHYDOXDWHGLQD0LQRU9LVXDO,PSDFW5HSRUW 9,$&KHFNOLVW

7KHUHDUHQRUHVLGHQWLDOEXVLQHVVUHORFDWLRQLPSDFWVDVVRFLDWHGZLWKWKH/RZHU(DVWVLGH3HGHVWULDQ%LF\FOH%ULGJH3URMHFW &RQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHSURSRVHGEULGJHPD\UHTXLUHDQ(QFURDFKPHQW3HUPLWIRUSRUWLRQVRIWKHSURMHFWORFDWHGZLWKLQ86 ULJKWRIZD\DQG8QLRQ3DFLILFDSSURYDOIRUWKH8355FURVVLQJ 7KHSURSRVHGSHGHVWULDQELF\FOHEULGJHSURMHFWLVFRQVLVWHQWZLWKFRPPXQLW\SODQVWRLPSURYHFRQQHFWLYLW\ZLWKLQWKH/RZHU (DVWVLGHQHLJKERUKRRGV
7KHSURSRVHGSURMHFWKDVQRSRWHQWLDOWRGLVUXSWRUGLYLGHQHLJKERUKRRGVRUFRPPXQLWLHV7KHSURSRVHGSURMHFWZLOOLPSURYH FRQQHFWLYLW\ZLWKLQHVWDEOLVKHG/RZHU(DVWVLGHQHLJKERUKRRGV 7KHSURSRVHGSURMHFWZLOOKDYHDEHQHILFLDOHIIHFWRQORZLQFRPHRUPLQRULW\SRSXODWLRQVLQWKHSURMHFWDUHDE\LPSURYLQJ SHGHVWULDQDQGELF\FOHFRQQHFWLYLW\ZLWKLQWKH/RZHU(DVWVLGHQHLJKERUKRRGV 7KHUHPD\EHSXEOLFXWLOLWLHVLQWKHSURMHFWDUHDWKDWFRXOGEHDIIHFWHGE\WKHSURSRVHGSURMHFW &RQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHSURMHFWPD\UHTXLUHULJKWRIZD\HDVHPHQWVIURP&DOWUDQV 86
EXWZLOOQRWFKDQJHDFFHVVFRQWUROWR
WKH6WDWH+LJKZD\6\VWHP
&RQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHSURMHFWPD\UHTXLUHULJKWRIZD\HDVHPHQWVIURP&DOWUDQV 86
DQG8QLRQ3DFLILF
8355
EXW
ZLOOQRWDIIHFWDFFHVVRURSHUDWLRQRIWKHVHSURSHUWLHVURDGZD\V 7KHSURSRVHGSURMHFWZLOOQRWUHTXLUHWHPSRUDU\URDGGHWRXUVRUUDPSFORVXUHV 7KHSURSRVHGSURMHFWZLOOQRWDIIHFWH[LVWLQJSDUNLQJ
&RQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHSURMHFWPD\UHTXLUHULJKWRIZD\DQ(QFURDFKPHQW3HUPLWIURP&DOWUDQVIRUSRUWLRQVRIWKHVWUXFWXUH ORFDWHGZLWKLQ86ULJKWRIZD\
7KHUHDUHQRIDUPODQGVLQWKHSURMHFWDUHD
7KHUHDUHUHFRUGHGKLVWRULFDQGSUHKLVWRULFUHVRXUFHVLQWKHSURMHFWDUHD$GGLWLRQDO6HFWLRQFXOWXUDOUHVRXUFHVWXGLHV ZLOOEHUHTXLUHGIRUWKHSURMHFW
6:&$&XOWXUDO&RQVWUDLQWV$QDO\VLV

7KHUHDUHQRWULEDOODQGVLQWKHSURSRVHGSURMHFWYLFLQLW\ 7KHHOHYDWHGVWUXFWXUHWKDWUXQVSDUDOOHOWRWKH]RRZRXOGEHVXSSRUWHGE\RUSLHUV&RQVWUXFWLRQRIWKHVWUXFWXUH ZRXOGUHVXOWLQWKHUHPRYDORIDOOODQGVFDSHWUHHVDORQJWKHERUGHURIDQH[LVWLQJSDUNLQJORWDQGQRQQDWLYHHXFDO\SWXV WUHHVZLWKLQ6\FDPRUH&UHHNWKDWDUHZLWKLQWKHSHGHVWULDQELF\FOHSDWKDOLJQPHQW ATTACHMENT 3
WW
E/y'
,zZh>/D
DKZEhD

ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
1 Hydraulic Memorandum
Date: Thursday, October 27, 2022
Project: Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan Project To: Greg Young – Quincy Engineering and the City of Santa Barbara From: Hannah Karlsson, Wana Chiu, and Han-Bin Liang – HDR|WRECO Subject: Hydrologic and Hydraulic Feasibility Study Technical Memorandum ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
2 1. Introduction
The City of Santa Barbara (City) is proposing the Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan Project (Project), which would construct a pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing to improve mobility between the Lower Eastside neighborhood and the Dwight Murphy Field. The Project area is located between the intersection of Canada and Pitos streets in the Lower Eastside neighborhood, crosses US Highway 101 (US 101) and the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks to the vicinity of Dwight Murphy Field in the City of Santa Barbara, California. See Figure 1 for the Project location map, Figure 2 for the Project vicinity map, and Figure 3 for the Project aerial map.

HDR|WRECO was tasked by the City to conduct a hydrologic and hydraulic feasibility study for the Project. The Project is located within the Sycamore Creek floodplain, south of the US 101 and the UPRR track crossings. The pedestrian overcrossing will cross over the Sycamore Creek channel on the western side of the approach near Dwight Murphy Field.

The purpose of this Memorandum is to provide a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis to evaluate the feasibility of constructing a pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing over the US 101 between the Lower Eastside neighborhood to the vicinity of Dwight Murphy Field.

Vertical and Horizontal Datum
The Project references the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) State Plane California Zone V horizontal datum and the North America Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88).

ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
3 Figure 1. Project Location Map
Source: United States Geological Survey (USGS)
^_
^_
036 1.5 Miles
¯
Legend
^_ Project Location
Sycamore Creek
Pacific Ocean
California State
ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
4 Figure 2. Project Vicinity Map
Source: Quincy Engineering, Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), 2022 0 250 500 125 Feet
¯
Legend
Sycamore Creek
Project Overcrossing
ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
5 Figure 3. Project Aerial Map
Source: Quincy Engineering and ESRI, 2022
0 250 500 125 Feet
¯
Legend
Sycamore Creek
Project Overcrossing
ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
6 Federal Emergency Management Agency Floodplain
The Project is located within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Number 06083C1391J, Panel 1391 of 1835, effective from September 28, 2018 (FEMA, 2018a). The Project site is located in Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) Zone AE, which represents areas subject to flooding by the 100-year flood event determined by detailed methods where base flood elevations (BFE) are shown. At the Project site, the 100-year flood elevation is approximately 16.4 feet (ft) NAVD 88. The FIRM at Project location is shown in Figure 4.

The Project site is also within a regulatory floodway. According to Title 44, Section 60.3(d)(3) of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), a community shall “prohibit encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements, and other development within the adopted regulatory floodway unless it has been demonstrated through hydrologic and hydraulic analyses performed in accordance with standard engineering practice that the proposed encroachment would not result in any increase in flood levels within the community during the occurrence of the base flood discharge.” The US 101 UPRR track crossing and proposed overcrossing is bound by FEMA cross sections E and F, which have a base flood water surface elevation (WSE) of 18.1 and 18.8 ft, respectively, as listed in the Floodway Data table (FEMA, 2018b). No increase of any amount in the BFE is allowed in the floodway. In 2019, a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) was developed for this floodplain area and the elevations were revised. Cross section E’s BFE was revised to 16.4 ft and cross section F remained the same.

Geographic Location
Sycamore Creek originates from the Santa Ynez Mountains north of the City of Santa Barbara and flows south through the east side of the City of Santa Barbara and discharges into the Pacific Ocean. The watershed area is 3.65 square miles at the mouth of Sycamore Creek (FEMA, 2018b).

The Project location is approximately 0.25 mile upstream of the outfall into the Pacific Ocean.

ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
7 Figure 4. FEMA FIRMette at Project Location Source: FEMA, 2018

ATTACHMENT
3 hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
8 Existing Structures
The proposed overcrossing is aligned on the south side of the US 101 and UPRR bridge crossing over Sycamore Creek. The US 101 bridge (Bridge No. 51 0332) was built in 2011. The US 101 bridge is a three-span continuous cast-in-place reinforced concrete slab. The center span (span 2) is currently the only span conveying flow. The two side spans (Span 1 and 3) are temporarily blocked off and will be opened when future channel improvements increase discharge through the channel.

The current open span of the US 101 bridge is approximately 35.5-ft-wide with a minimum soffit elevation of 14.9 ft, based on the survey Quincy Engineering provided (2022). The existing span opening is only span 2. Span 1 and 3 on either side are blocked and will be used to accommodate hydraulic expansion during future flood protection projects.

The UPRR track is a separate bridge approximately 100 ft downstream (south) of the US 101 bridge.

The UPRR bridge is a single-span with an opening width of 35 ft and a minimum soffit elevation of approximately 15.9 ft, based on survey provided by Quincy Engineering (2022).

Proposed Structures
The proposed pedestrian structure will cross over the Sycamore Creek channel approximately 44 ft downstream (south) of the UPRR track crossing. The structure will be 14-ft-wide and will have a clear-span over Sycamore Creek with an opening width of approximately 80 ft. The structure is proposed to conform to grade at the bend on Nino Drive approximately 140 ft west of the west bank of Sycamore Creek. The abutment of the structure will be on the west bank of Sycamore Creek and the structure deck will increase in elevation eastward. The proposed span length has been selected to accommodate future floodwall projects and the US 101 Span 1 and 3 hydraulic expansion.

Background Information and Previous Studies
The City has had several hydraulic studies conducted previously for Sycamore Creek and the surrounding area, which were provided and reviewed for this study. The Santa Barbara County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (SBFCWCD) prepared a Flood Capacity Master Plan for Sycamore Creek (Master Plan) (Penfield & Smith, 2003) to improve the conveyance of Sycamore Creek. This Master Plan is a guide for future projects along Sycamore Creek. The Master Plan established a feasible design capacity for Sycamore Creek near US 101 to be 3,000 cubic feet per second (cfs).

Since 2003, several public works projects within the lower reach of Sycamore Creek have been completed and more are underway. In 2010, the US 101 bridge was replaced to ultimately convey 3,000 cfs and was built to allow for future flow conveyance as future channel improvements are implemented. The Sycamore Creek Project Study Report (Bengal, 2018) was prepared for the SBFCWCD to evaluate the overall performance of the completed projects and the future improvements to the channel to meet the target conveyance.

In 2019, a LOMR was developed (Kasraie Consulting, 2018) for the floodplain area at the Project site. The LOMR information was used in the hydraulic analysis of this Memorandum.

ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
9 Design Standards
FEMA Standards
FEMA standards are employed for design, construction, and regulation to reduce flood loss and to protect resources. Two types of standards are often employed: design criteria and performance standards.

A design criteria or specified standard dictates that a provision, practice, requirement, or limit be met; e.g., using the 1% flood and establishing floodway boundaries so as not to cause more than a 1-ft increase in flood stages.

A performance standard dictates that a goal is to be achieved, leaving it to the individual application as to how to achieve the goal; e.g., providing protection to the regulatory flood, keeping postdevelopment stormwater runoff the same as pre-development, or maintaining the present quantity and quality of water in a wetland.

The 1% annual chance flood and floodplain have been adopted as a common design and regulatory standard in the United States. The National Floodplain Insurance Program (NFIP) adopted it in the early 1970s, and it was adopted as a standard for use by all federal agencies with the issuance of Executive Order 11988. States or local agencies are free to impose a more stringent standard within their jurisdiction.

Floodplain Regulations
FEMA defines a regulatory floodway as:
the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than a designated height. Communities must regulate development in these floodways to ensure that there are no increases in upstream flood elevations (FEMA, 2019a).

According to Title 44, Section 60.3(d)(3) of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), a community shall:
prohibit encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements, and other development within the adopted regulatory floodway unless it has been demonstrated through hydrologic and hydraulic analyses performed in accordance with standard engineering practice that the proposed encroachment would not result in any increase in flood levels within the community during the occurrence of the base flood discharge (FEMA, 2019b).

The community is responsible to review and maintain record of the documentation demonstrating that any permitted floodway encroachment meets NFIP requirements. A “no-rise certification” for floodways may be used to document the analyses.

ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
10 Per Title 44, Section 60.3(d)(4) of the CFR, floodway encroachments that cause an increase may be permitted, provided the community first applies for a conditional FIRM and floodway revision (Conditional Letter of Map Revision, or CLOMR) and fulfills the requirements for such revisions as established under the provisions of Title 44 Section 65.12 of the CFR and receives the approval of the Floodplain Administrator (FEMA, 2019b).

Hydraulic Design Criteria

FHWA STANDARDS
Bridges must be designed per the California American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials Load and Resistance Factor Design Bridge Design Specifications (2017 Eighth Edition) (AASHTO LRFD BDS) (Caltrans, 2019). AASHTO LRFD BDS Section 2.6.3 defers to state requirements for hydraulic studies.

From Memo to Designers 16-1 Hydraulic Design for Structures over Waterways, the proposed bridge soffit should provide adequate freeboard to pass anticipated drift for the 50-year design flood, or to pass the 100-year base flood without freeboard, whichever is greater (Caltrans, 2017).

CALTRANS STANDARDS
From Chapter 820 of the Caltrans’ HDM, the criteria for the hydraulic design of bridges is that they be designed to pass the 2% probability of annual exceedance flow (50-year design discharge) with adequate freeboard to pass anticipated drift and debris (2020). Two (2) ft of freeboard is commonly used in bridge designs. Alternatively, the bridge can also be designed to pass the 1% probability of annual exceedance flow (100-year design discharge, or base flood). No freeboard is added to the base flood.

Design Considerations

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY STANDARDS
HDR|WRECO met with staff from the City, County of Santa Barbara, Kasraie Consulting, and Quincy Engineering on August 5, 2022 to discuss the Project’s hydraulic goals, design limitations, and criteria. Below is a summary of the assumptions for the hydraulic conditions. x Sycamore Creek conveyance at the Project site is controlled by the bridge opening of US 101 and the UPRR bridge. The entrance to the zoo culvert and Por La Mar Circle culvert crossings over Sycamore Creek have limited flood capacity and are controlling the existing hydraulics downstream of the Project site.
x The US 101 bridge, with the three spans open, has a total width is approximately 79.2 ft parallel to the proposed structure. The two piers and potential for debris accumulation reduced the conveyance at the US 101 bridge. The existing condition of the culvert only is conveying flow through the middle span with an opening of approximately 35.5 ft. x The proposed structure width should be the same opening or wider and is required to have an equal or higher conveyance threshold than the surrounding structures to maintain the target discharge based on the Master Plan.

ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
11 x The proposed structure will have a soffit elevation that is above the adjacent ground elevation and the US 101 soffit elevation to minimize the impact to the flow conveyance and floodplain.
x Flows over 2,000 cfs often escape the channel but then reenter at other locations. x Future improvement studies assumed a 3,000 cfs flow which equate to around a 55-year storm. x Standard freeboard for structures or conveying the 100-year flow was often not feasible. x The County does consider “typical levels” of bulking in the flow but at this location the 3,000 cfs is all that is feasible whether it includes bulking or not. Bulking is also sometimes accommodated by increasing the debris width on bridge pier supports. x The City project will need to consider future channel flood wall widening at Sycamore Creek. The proposed Bengal widths should be considered the minimum required, so any future project would at least need to accommodate that.

CALTRANS SEA LEVEL RISE GUIDELINES
Per Executive Order S-13-08 (November 14, 2008) all state agencies planning to construct projects in areas vulnerable to future sea level rise (SLR) must consider a range of sea-level projections for years 2050 and 2100, assess project vulnerability, and to the extent feasible, reduce expected risks and increase resiliency to SLR.

ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
12 2. Hydrology
HDR|WRECO obtained flows from several sources to evaluate potential flow conditions at the Project site. The 100-year and 50-year design flows were obtained from the FEMA Flood Insurance Study (FIS). According to the FIS, the 100-year flow decreases downstream of US 101 due to overflow at US 101. The 2019 LOMR revised the flow downstream of US 101 at the location of the Project crossing and at the mouth of Sycamore Creek.

A bulked 100-year flow was obtained from the SBFCWCD South Coast Watershed Map (1975). The summary of the flows within the vicinity of the Project during the 50-year and 100-year design flows are listed in Table 1. The 100- and 50-year flows from the FEMA LOMR were used for the selected design flows in the hydraulic analysis. Additionally, the 3,000 cfs (approximately 55-year flow) design capacity from the Master Plan and the Sycamore Creek Project Study Report (Bengal, 2018) was evaluated for hydraulic analysis.

Table 1. Summary of 100- and 50-year Flows and Sources
Method/Source
Location
Design Flow
(cubic ft per second [cfs])
100-year 50-year
SBCFCWCD South Coast
Watershed Map At US 101 4,700 --
FEMA (2018) At mouth 3,306 2,942
FEMA LOMR (2019) At mouth 1,975 1,826
FEMA LOMR (2019)
Upstream of US
Highway 101 3,306 2,942
Source: FEMA, 2018
Sea-level Rise Consideration
The State of California Sea-Level Rise Guidance, 2018 Update (California Coastal Commission, 2018) was used to determine the scenario-based SLR projections of the Project site. The SLR projections for Santa Barbara, which is the closest location to the Project site that is included in the 2018 SLR Guidance, are provided in Table 2. The 2018 SLR Guidance uses the year 2000 as the baseline for the probabilistic projections and includes a low to high emission scenario leading up to 2150.

ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
13 Table 2. SLR Projection (in feet) for Santa Barbara
Source: OPC SLR Guidance, 2018
Depending on the service life of the Project and the construction date, a projected SLR should be considered. Assuming the design life is 75 years based on the Highway Design Manual (Caltrans, 2020) for the design life of a bridge and the estimated construction end date is 2025, the projected SLR year would be 2100. Based on the assumed Project design life and the medium-to-high-risk scenario with high emissions, a SLR projection of 6.6 ft in the year 2100 is estimated for the Project’s SLR impact evaluations. Per conversations with the County of Santa Barbara on August 5, 2022, SLR is not considered in the current studies. Further evaluation of SLR impacts to the Sycamore Creek channel are recommended as needed.

ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
14 3. Hydraulic Assessment
Model Source
The 2018 LOMR model for Lower Sycamore Creek was developed by Kasraie Consulting. This LOMR model was provided as a base model for the evaluation of this proposed Project. The 2018 LOMR model is a steady state one-dimensional model developed using the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Hydrologic Engineering Center’s River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) modeling software, Version 4.1.0. Due to the lateral structures with gates used in this model, the analysis was required to be run in version 4.1.0.

The FEMA effective LOMR model extends upstream approximately 0.15 mile north of the Alameda Padre Serra crossing and downstream to the mouth of Sycamore Creek at the Pacific Ocean.

Model Input
Survey Data
Survey data was provided by Quincy Engineering (2022a). Survey within the channel was limited to three channel cross sections. The surveyed cross sections at the upstream face of US 101, upstream face and the downstream face of the UPRR tracks bridge were updated in the model geometry. In order to incorporate the proposed structure alignment, three cross sections were added. The geometry for the three cross sections was updated using the survey provided by Quincy Engineering and interpolated geometry from the adjacent cross sections in the LOMR cross sections in areas the Quincy Engineering survey did not extend.

Boundary Conditions
The model uses the boundary conditions (BC) provided in the LOMR effective model and the Sycamore Creek Project Study Report (Bengal Engineering, 2018) for the 55-year flow. The 50-, 55- and 100-year flows of 2,942 cfs, 3,000, and 3,306 cfs, respectively, were input into the upstream BC.

The downstream BC for the 50- and 55-year flows was input as normal depth with a friction slope of

0.003 ft/ft. The downstream BC for the 100-year flow was input at a known water surface elevation of 12 ft.

Manning’s Roughness Coefficients
Manning’s roughness coefficients were used in the hydraulic model to estimate energy losses in the flow due to friction. A roughness coefficient of 0.035 was used to describe the channel, a roughness coefficient of 0.03 was used to describe open fields on the overbanks, and 0.06 was used to describe structures and heavily vegetated areas on the overbank areas. These values were selected based on the effective model inputs and were verified using aerial imagery and field photos.

Expansion and Contraction Coefficients
Expansion and contraction coefficients were used in the hydraulic model to represent energy losses in the channel. An expansion coefficient of 0.3 and a contraction coefficient of 0.1 were used to ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
15 represent the channel. These values represent a channel with gradual transitions between cross sections. An expansion coefficient of 0.5 to 0.7 and a contraction coefficient of 0.3 to 0.5 were used to represent the channel in the vicinity of the structures. These values represent the flow interference caused by the structures.

Proposed Alternatives
Three alternatives were provided by Quincy Engineering (2022). The preferred single span alternative was used for the hydraulic analysis (See Figure 5). All alternatives have similar approach profiles below the floodplain WSE. The proposed structure crossover will be approximately 14-ftwide and span Sycamore Creek downstream on the UPRR track crossing. The west abutment face of the proposed structure will be approximately 12 ft west of the west bank of Sycamore Creek. The proposed structure profile will increase in elevation at an approximately 4.9% slope towards the east.

The span over Sycamore Creek will be approximately 79.5-ft-long. The proposed structure will have eight 4-ft-diameter bridge supports on the east overbank of Sycamore Creek and the south side of the UPRR track and US 101. The structure will cross over the UPRR track and US 101 and ramp down to conform to the existing ground elevation near the intersection on Pitos Street and Canada Street. Approximately 100 ft of fill for the abutment on the north side of US 101 is proposed for the east ramp abutment. The fill was incorporated into the terrain at the cross section upstream of US 101 and the lateral structure with gates, which represents the sound wall along US 101.

Hydraulic Model Results
The results of the hydraulic modeling are discussed in this section. Depth, velocity, and WSE results for the 100-, 50-, and 55-year design flows for the existing and proposed conditions are shown in Attachment A and Attachment B, respectively.

Water Surface Elevation
The 100-, 50-, and 55-year WSE results are shown in Table 3, Table 4, and Table 5, respectively.

Based on the hydraulic model results, during the 100-year design flow, the change in WSE from existing to proposed condition show a WSE increase of 0.04 ft upstream of the proposed structure and a maximum decrease of 0.01 ft. During the 50-year design flow, the comparison of the existing to proposed results shows a WSE increase of 0.03 ft upstream of the proposed structure. The Master Plan target discharge of a 55-year flow shows no increase and a maximum decrease of 0.02 ft upstream of the proposed structure and 0.03 downstream of the proposed structure. Figure 6 shows the 100-year WSE profile for the existing and proposed conditions. The upstream face of the proposed structures is shown in Figure 7.

The increases in water surface elevations in the vicinities of the proposed structure may be minimized by implementing any or a combination of the following measures:
x Adjusting the opening of the proposed bridge structure x Grading the main channel and/or overbanks areas (balance cut and fill) x Adding ramps or culverts to convey the flow to the soundwall openings ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
16 These minimization measures will be further determined during the design phase of the Project when more survey and detailed design information is available.

ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
17 Figure 5. Proposed Overcrossing Profile Plan
Source: Quincy Engineering, 2022b

ATTACHMENT
3 hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
18 Table 3. 100-Year Water Surface Elevation Results
River
Station
Description/Distance from
Existing Bridge Centerline (feet)
Water Surface Elevation (ft)
100-year
Difference
Existing Proposed Single in WSE (ft) Span Alternative
1900 307 feet upstream of proposed structure 18.81 18.80 -0.01 1899.1 306 feet upstream of proposed structure 0.00 0.00 -- 1851.133 258 feet upstream of proposed structure 18.63 18.63 0.00 1823.768 230 feet upstream of proposed structure 18.44 18.44 0.00 1726.932
USH101
BR U
Upstream face of US 101 Bridge

15.09 15.09 0.00
1726.932
USH101
BR D
Downstream face of US 101 Bridge

15.74 15.74 0.00
1659.316 66 feet upstream of proposed structure 17.28 17.29 0.01 1658.316 65 feet upstream of proposed structure 17.26 17.26 0.00 1633.359
Railroad
BR U
Upstream face of UPRR Bridge

15.94 15.94 0.00
1633.359
Railroad
BR D
Downstream face of UPRR Bridge

16.15 16.18 0.03
1612.363 19 feet upstream of proposed structure 16.15 16.18 0.03 1608 15 feet upstream of proposed structure 16.08 16.11 0.03 1604 11 feet upstream of proposed structure 16.07 16.11 0.04 1593.5
BR U Upstream face of Proposed Bridge -- 16.07 --
1593.5
BR D Downstream face of Proposed Bridge -- 16.34 --
1583 11 feet downstream of proposed structure 16.35 16.35 0.00 1500 94 feet downstream of proposed structure 16.37 16.37 0.00 1400 194 feet downstream of proposed structure 16.36 16.36 0.00 1302.082
E 292 feet downstream of proposed structure 16.36 16.37 0.01 1265.925
Zoo Ent Zoo Entrance Culvert 0.00 0.00 --
1215.742 378 feet downstream of proposed structure 16.35 16.36 0.01 ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
19 Table 4. 50-Year Water Surface Elevation Results
River
Station
Description/Distance from
Existing Bridge Centerline (feet)
Water Surface Elevation (ft)
50-year
Difference
Existing Proposed Single in WSE (ft) Span Alternative
1900 307 feet upstream of proposed structure 18.31 18.31 0.00 1899.1 306 feet upstream of proposed structure 0.00 0.00 -- 1851.133 258 feet upstream of proposed structure 18.12 18.12 0.00 1823.768 230 feet upstream of proposed structure 17.95 17.96 0.01 1726.932
USH101
BR U
Upstream face of US 101 Bridge

15.09 15.09 0.00
1726.932
USH101
BR D
Downstream face of US 101 Bridge

15.74 15.74 0.00
1659.316 66 feet upstream of proposed structure 16.98 16.98 0.00 1658.316 65 feet upstream of proposed structure 16.97 16.98 0.01 1633.359
Railroad
BR U
Upstream face of UPRR Bridge

15.94 15.94 0.00
1633.359
Railroad
BR D
Downstream face of UPRR Bridge

14.90 14.93 0.03
1612.363 19 feet upstream of proposed structure 14.90 14.93 0.03 1608 15 feet upstream of proposed structure 14.88 14.91 0.03 1604 11 feet upstream of proposed structure 14.86 14.89 0.03 1593.5
BR U Upstream face of Proposed Bridge -- 14.87 --
1593.5
BR D Downstream face of Proposed Bridge -- 15.11 --
1583 11 feet downstream of proposed structure 15.10 15.13 0.03 1500 94 feet downstream of proposed structure 15.16 15.18 0.02 1400 194 feet downstream of proposed structure 15.13 15.15 0.02 1302.082
E 292 feet downstream of proposed structure 15.13 15.15 0.02 1265.925
Zoo Ent Zoo Entrance Culvert 0.00 0.00 --
1215.742 378 feet downstream of proposed structure 15.13 15.13 0.00 ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
20 Table 5. 55-Year Water Surface Elevation Results
River Station Description/Distance from
Existing Bridge Centerline (feet)
Water Surface Elevation (ft)
55-year
Difference
Existing Proposed in WSE (ft) Single
Span
Alternative
1900 307 feet upstream of proposed structure 18.38 18.37 -0.01 1899.1 306 feet upstream of proposed structure 0.00 0.00 -- 1851.133 258 feet upstream of proposed structure 18.19 18.19 0.00 1823.768 230 feet upstream of proposed structure 18.02 18.02 0.00 1726.932
USH101
BR U
Upstream face of US 101 Bridge

15.09 15.09 0.00
1726.932
USH101
BR D
Downstream face of US 101 Bridge

15.74 15.74 0.00
1659.316 66 feet upstream of proposed structure 17.02 17.02 0.00 1658.316 65 feet upstream of proposed structure 17.01 17.01 0.00 1633.359
Railroad
BR U
Upstream face of UPRR Bridge

15.94 15.94 0.00
1633.359
Railroad
BR D
Downstream face of UPRR Bridge

14.99 14.98 -0.01
1612.363 19 feet upstream of proposed structure 14.99 14.98 -0.01 1608 15 feet upstream of proposed structure 14.97 14.96 -0.01 1604 11 feet upstream of proposed structure 14.96 14.94 -0.02 1593.5 BR U Upstream face of Proposed Bridge -- 14.92 -- 1593.5 BR D Downstream face of Proposed Bridge -- 15.17 -- 1583 11 feet downstream of proposed structure 15.21 15.19 -0.02 1500 94 feet downstream of proposed structure 15.26 15.24 -0.02 1400 194 feet downstream of proposed structure 15.24 15.21 -0.03 1302.082 E 292 feet downstream of proposed structure 15.24 15.21 -0.03 1265.925 Zoo
Ent Zoo Entrance Culvert 0.00 0.00 --
1215.742 378 feet downstream of proposed structure 15.22 15.21 -0.01 ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
21 Figure 6. 100-year WSE Profile for the existing and proposed conditions. 0 500 1000 1500 2000
0 1020304050
LowerEastsideFeasibilityStudy Plan: 1) Existing 10 2022 10/11/2022 2) Proposed 10 2022 10/11/2022 Main Channel Distance (ft)
Elevation (ft)
Legend
WS 100 - Existing 10 2022
WS 100 - Proposed 10 2022
Ground
292.4...
327.6...
373.0...
499.9...
599.9...
647.3...
698.7...
750.0...
799.9...
900
1000
1049.088...
1105.559
1215.742
1265.925
1400
1500
1583
1604
1633.359
1726.932
1851.133
1900
1949.992
2000
2035
2085
2125.002
2165.018
SycamoreCk 1
Proposed Structure
UPRR Tracks
US Highway 101
Sound Wall
Structure upstream
(North) of US 101

ATTACHMENT
3 hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
22 Figure 7. 100-year WSE at the upstream face of the Proposed Bridge and overcrossing structure. 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
0 1020304050
LowerEastsideFeasibilityStudy Plan: 1) Existing 10 2022 10/11/2022 2) Proposed 10 2022 10/11/2022 Station (ft)
Elevation (ft)
Legend
WS 100 - Proposed 10 2022
Ground
Ineff
Bank Sta
.
06 .
035
.06 .035 .03 .035 .06 .035 .08

ATTACHMENT
3 hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
23 Freeboard
The proposed structure has a minimum soffit elevation of approximately 16.0 ft. The minimum soffit elevation is at the west abutment. Based on the hydraulic results, the proposed structure has no freeboard during the 100-year flow, and approximately 0.1 ft of freeboard during the 50-year flow.

Per the Federal Highway Administrator (FHWA) and Caltrans requirements, adequate freeboard is required for the 100-year flow and approximately 2 ft of freeboard for the 50-year flow to pass anticipated drift. The existing structures upstream, US 101, and the UPRR tracks bridges, currently do not have freeboard and will be controlling the flow upstream of the proposed structure. The proposed structure allows more flow conveyance than the adjacent UPRR structure and the future US 101 bridge after opening the 1 and 3 spans. Table 6 shows the existing WSE upstream of the bridges and Table 7 shows the proposed WSE at the existing and proposed structures. Table 8 shows the freeboard for the existing WSE conditions directly upstream of the existing structure and Project location. Table 9 shows the freeboard for the proposed WSE conditions.

Table 6. Existing WSE at the upstream side of existing bridge crossings and the proposed structure.

Locations
WSE (ft)
100-year 50-year 55-year
US 101 Bridge 18.4 18.0 18.0
UPRR Tracks Bridge 17.3 17.0 17.0
Existing Condition at Proposed structure 16.1 14.9 15.0 Table 7. Proposed WSE at the upstream side of the bridge crossings and proposed structure.

Locations
WSE (ft)
100-year 50-year 55-year
US 101 Bridge 18.4 18.0 18.0
UPRR Tracks Bridge 17.3 17.0 17.0
Proposed Structure 16.1 14.9 14.9
ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
24 Table 8. Freeboard for existing conditions directly upstream of the existing structures and proposed Project.

Locations
Minimum Soffit
Elevation (ft)
Freeboard (ft)
100-year 50-year 55-year
US 101 Bridge 15.0 -3.4 -3.0 -3.0
UPRR Tracks Bridge 15.9 -1.4 -1.1 -1.1
Note: Negative values indicate the bridge has no freeboard.

Table 9. Freeboard for Proposed WSE directly upstream of the existing structures and proposed Project.

Locations
Minimum Soffit
Elevation (ft)
Freeboard (ft)
100-year 50-year 55-year
US 101 Existing Bridge 15.0 -3.4 -3.0 -3.0
UPRR Tracks Bridge 15.9 -2.3 -2.0 -2.0
Proposed Structure 16.0 -1.1 0.1 0.1
Note: Negative values indicate the bridge has no freeboard.

ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
25 4. Conclusions
Based on the preliminary results of the hydraulics model, the proposed overcrossing structure will result in negligible impact to the floodplain WSE. Further analysis will be needed during the final design of this Project, and coordination with a floodplain administrator will be required to corroborate any potential floodplain impacts.

The proposed structure has a wider opening and will provide more freeboard that the surrounding structures at the UPRR track and the US 101 bridge. This proposed structure is not anticipated to reduce the target conveyance flow of 3,000 cfs in the channel. The proposed Project will be designed to convey the target discharge of 3,000 cfs and is anticipated to maintain the goals of the Master Plan for Sycamore Creek.

Final Design Recommendations
Recommendations and Limitations
Additional survey is recommended for the design of this Project. The survey extent was limited and did not extend the entire width of the floodplain. Three cross sections in the channel were updated to the current surface conditions. The additional cross sections were interpolated from the LOMR cross section geometry. The 0.04 ft increase is negligible based on the resolution of the elevation data used to update the feasibility model. Due to the limited accuracy of the topography, the model results cannot confirm any significant impact to the channel. During Project development, additional survey is recommended to be obtained and implemented into the hydraulic evaluation. The hydraulic model utilized a version 4.1.0 HEC-RAS model from the LOMR with several lateral structures and gates, which makes the model considerably sensitive and close coordination with the design and hydraulic team is recommended to address any hydraulic issues that may arise. In the design phase of this Project a 2-dimensional (2-D) model is recommended to determine accurate flow paths around the proposed structure. Figure 8 illustrates the cross sections and topographic land survey needed for updating the 1-dimensional (1-D) and developing a 2-D model.

ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
26 Figure 8. Locations for additional survey requests.

Source: ESRI, 2022
Scope of Work
The following lists the items recommended for the hydraulic studies during the Project development and design phase:
x Project Management and Meetings
x Field Visit
x Location Hydraulic Study (LHS)
x Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analyses for LHS
x Bridge Design Hydraulic Study (BDHS)
x Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analyses for BDHS
x Scour and RSP Calculations
ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
27 Below is a description of the recommended deliverables scoped for this Project.

The LHS would document the existing floodplains within the Project limits and discuss any potential impacts caused by improvements by the Project. The Project is located in SFHA Zone AE, which represents areas subject to flooding by the 100-year flood event determined by detailed methods where BFE are shown (see Figure 4). The Project site is also within a regulatory floodway, which prohibits any new construction in the regulatory floodway that results in an increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge. HDR|WRECO would perform hydrologic and hydraulic assessment/analyses of the existing condition and the proposed conditions for the Project. A 1-D model would be developed for the LHS to determine the floodplain impacts caused by the Project. coordination with local floodplain agencies would be required throughout the process.

Based on the Flood Capacity Master Plan for Sycamore Creek (Master Plan) (Penfield & Smith, 2003), the Sycamore Creek flood channel will ultimately be designed to accommodate a 55-year event (3,000 cfs). To accommodate future flood capacity the pedestrian and bicycle overcrossing is proposed to have a span wider than the ultimate span for US 101 and have a soffit above the 55- year flood elevations.

HDR|WRECO would assess impacts to floodplains within the Project limits and minimization or mitigation measures, as appropriate. The findings of the assessment and analyses would be summarized in the Floodplain Evaluation Report.

Due to the complexity of the floodplain at this Project location a 2-D model is recommended to be developed for the BDHS. The BDHS would document the results from the hydraulic and bridge scour analyses and recommendations for bridge scour countermeasures. The report would also include all of the detailed hydraulic model outputs.

ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
28 5. References
California Coastal Commission.
2018 California Coastal Commission Sea Level Rise Guidance.

California Department of Transportation
2020 Highway Design Manual. Chapter 820 Section 821.3 Selection of Design Flood. Page 820-2. <Highway Design Manual (HDM) | Caltrans> (Last accessed: January 20, 2022).

California Department of Transportation
2019 California Amendments to the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (2017 Eighth Edition). <https://dot.ca.gov/programs/engineering-services/manuals/lrfd-caamendments-8th-edition> (Last accessed: January 20, 2022).

California Department of Transportation
2017 Memo to Designers 16-1 Hydraulic Design for Structures over Waterways. <https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dotmedia/programs/engineering/documents/memotodesigner/f0006651-mtd-16-1-final.pdf> (Last accessed: January 20, 2022).

Bengal Engineering
2018 Sycamore Creek Project Study Report.

Caltrans.
2022 Bridge Inspection Report. Facility Carried: US Highway 101. Bridge Number 51 0332.

Structure Name: Sycamore Creek.

Federal Emergency Management Agency
2019a National Flood Hazard Layer for Santa Barbara County.

Federal Emergency Management Agency
2019b Title 44 Section 60.3 “Flood plain management criteria for flood-prone areas,” Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Government Publishing Office.

Federal Emergency Management Agency
2019c Letter of Map Revision, Santa Barbara County, California and Incorporated Areas. Case Numbers 18-09-1503P-060335 and 18-09-1502P-060335, Published: 06/21/2019 & 06/24/2019
Federal Emergency Management Agency
2018a Flood Insurance Rate Map, Santa Barbara County, California and Incorporated Areas.

Map Numbers 6083C1391J, Panel 1391 of 1835
Federal Emergency Management Agency
2018b Flood Insurance Study, Santa Barbara County, California and Incorporated Areas. Flood Insurance Study Numbers 06083CV001D and 06083CV002D.

Kasraie Consulting.
2018 Letter of Map Revision Lower Sycamore Creek
Penfield & Smith
2003 Flood Capacity Master Plan for Sycamore Creek. (Last accessed: August 24, 2022) Santa Barbara County Flood and Water Conservation District 1975 South Coast Watershed Map
ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
29 Quincy Engineering.
2022a Survey Topo. 22-3473jbb-TOPO Surface Data.dwg
Quincy Engineering.
2022b Proposed Structure Plan. 22-3473rea-000 Exhibit.pdf and Santa Barbara US-101 POC_Align.dwg

ATTACHMENT 3
hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
30 Attachment A: Existing HEC-RAS Results
ATTACHMENT 3
+(&5$63ODQ
([LVWLQJ5LYHU
6\FDPRUH&N5HDFK

5HDFK 5LYHU6WD 3URILOH 47RWDO 0LQ&K(O :6(OHY &ULW:6 (*(OHY (*6ORSH 9HO&KQO )ORZ$UHD 7RS:LGWK )URXGH&KO

FIV

IWIW

IWV

VTIW

+

+

3XQWD*RUGD %ULGJH *

*

*

/DW6WUXFW

)

/DW6WUXFW

86+ %ULGJH

ATTACHMENT
3 +(&5$63ODQ
([LVWLQJ5LYHU
6\FDPRUH&N5HDFK

&RQWLQXHG

5HDFK 5LYHU6WD 3URILOH 47RWDO 0LQ&K(O :6(OHY &ULW:6 (*(OHY (*6ORSH 9HO&KQO )ORZ$UHD 7RS:LGWK )URXGH&KO

FIV

IWIW

IWV

VTIW

5DLOURDG %ULGJH

(
(

(
=RR(QW &XOYHUW

ATTACHMENT
3 +(&5$63ODQ
([LVWLQJ5LYHU
6\FDPRUH&N5HDFK

&RQWLQXHG

5HDFK 5LYHU6WD 3URILOH 47RWDO 0LQ&K(O :6(OHY &ULW:6 (*(OHY (*6ORSH 9HO&KQO )ORZ$UHD 7RS:LGWK )URXGH&KO

FIV

IWIW

IWV

VTIW

3RU/D0DU&LU1 &XOYHUW

' '

'

& &

&

3RU/D0DU&LU6 &XOYHUW

ATTACHMENT
3 +(&5$63ODQ
([LVWLQJ5LYHU
6\FDPRUH&N5HDFK

&RQWLQXHG

5HDFK 5LYHU6WD 3URILOH 47RWDO 0LQ&K(O :6(OHY &ULW:6 (*(OHY (*6ORSH 9HO&KQO )ORZ$UHD 7RS:LGWK )URXGH&KO

FIV

IWIW

IWV

VTIW

%

&DEULOOR %ULGJH
$

$

$

3HGHVWULDQ%ULGJ %ULGJH

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
0DLQ&KDQQHO'LVWDQFH
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG

6\FDPRUH&N

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
DGGHGSWWRUHSUHVHQWVRXQGZDOO
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
)UHHZD\6RXQGZDOOLVDWULJKWHQGRIFURVVVHFWLRQPRGHOHGE\/ 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
)UHHZD\6RXQGZDOOLVDWULJKWHQGRIFURVVVHFWLRQPRGHOHGE\/ 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
)UHHZD\6RXQGZDOOLVDWULJKWHQGRIFURVVVHFWLRQPRGHOHGE\/ 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
)UHHZD\6RXQGZDOOLVDWULJKWHQGRIFURVVVHFWLRQPRGHOHGE\/ 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
)UHHZD\6RXQGZDOOLVDWULJKWDQGOHIWHQGVRIFURVVVHFWLRQPR 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
)UHHZD\6RXQGZDOOLVDWULJKWDQGOHIWHQGVRIFURVVVHFWLRQPR 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
)UHHZD\6RXQGZDOOLVDWULJKWDQGOHIWHQGVRIFURVVVHFWLRQPR 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6
:6
*URXQG
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6
:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
LQFOXGHGRQO\VROLGSDUWRIUDLOEULGJHEDUULHUDERYHWRSRIUDL 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6
:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
LQFOXGHGRQO\VROLGSDUWRIUDLOEULGJHEDUULHUDERYHWRSRIUDL 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
FRSLHGFKDQQHOIURP

6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
$GGHG&URVVVHFWLRQ86RI3HG%ULGJH
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
$GGHG&URVVVHFWLRQ86RI3HG%ULGJH
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
FKDQQHOIURPGURSSHGLQYHUW
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
8VHGORZHVWLQYHUWVKRWIURPVXUYH\IRUXVDQGGVVLGHIRUDOO 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
8VHGORZHVWLQYHUWVKRWIURPVXUYH\IRUXVDQGGVVLGHIRUDOO 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
FRSLHGFKDQQHOIURPGURSSHGLQYHUW
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
FRSLHGFKDQQHOIURP
XVHGGRZQVWUHDPLQYHUWIURPVXUYH\
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
FRSLHGXVFKDQQHO

EHWZHHQEDQNVWDWLRQV
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
1R%ULGJH3ODQV$YDLODEOH1RW,QFOXGHGLQ0RGHO),6 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
1R%ULGJH3ODQV$YDLODEOH1RW,QFOXGHGLQ0RGHO),6 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
FRSLHGIURPFRSLHGXVFKDQQHO

6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
([LVWLQJ
FRSLHGIURPFRSLHGXVFKDQQHO

6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3 hdrinc.com 3003 Oak Road, Suite 500, Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (925) 465-2862
31 Attachment B: Proposed HEC-RAS Results
ATTACHMENT 3
+(&5$63ODQ
3URSRVHG5LYHU
6\FDPRUH&N5HDFK

5HDFK 5LYHU6WD 3URILOH 47RWDO 0LQ&K(O :6(OHY &ULW:6 (*(OHY (*6ORSH 9HO&KQO )ORZ$UHD 7RS:LGWK )URXGH&KO

FIV

IWIW

IWV

VTIW

+

+

+

3XQWD*RUGD %ULGJH *

*

*

/DW6WUXFW

)

/DW6WUXFW

86+ %ULGJH

ATTACHMENT
3 +(&5$63ODQ
3URSRVHG5LYHU
6\FDPRUH&N5HDFK

&RQWLQXHG

5HDFK 5LYHU6WD 3URILOH 47RWDO 0LQ&K(O :6(OHY &ULW:6 (*(OHY (*6ORSH 9HO&KQO )ORZ$UHD 7RS:LGWK )URXGH&KO

FIV

IWIW

IWV

VTIW

5DLOURDG %ULGJH

%ULGJH

( (

(
=RR(QW &XOYHUW

ATTACHMENT
3 +(&5$63ODQ
3URSRVHG5LYHU
6\FDPRUH&N5HDFK

&RQWLQXHG

5HDFK 5LYHU6WD 3URILOH 47RWDO 0LQ&K(O :6(OHY &ULW:6 (*(OHY (*6ORSH 9HO&KQO )ORZ$UHD 7RS:LGWK )URXGH&KO

FIV

IWIW

IWV

VTIW

3RU/D0DU&LU1 &XOYHUW

' '

'

& &

&

3RU/D0DU&LU6 &XOYHUW

ATTACHMENT
3 +(&5$63ODQ
3URSRVHG5LYHU
6\FDPRUH&N5HDFK

&RQWLQXHG

5HDFK 5LYHU6WD 3URILOH 47RWDO 0LQ&K(O :6(OHY &ULW:6 (*(OHY (*6ORSH 9HO&KQO )ORZ$UHD 7RS:LGWK )URXGH&KO

FIV

IWIW

IWV

VTIW

%

&DEULOOR %ULGJH
$

$

$

3HGHVWULDQ%ULGJ %ULGJH

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
0DLQ&KDQQHO'LVWDQFH
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG

6\FDPRUH&N

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
DGGHGSWWRUHSUHVHQWVRXQGZDOO
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
)UHHZD\6RXQGZDOOLVDWULJKWHQGRIFURVVVHFWLRQPRGHOHGE\/ 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
)UHHZD\6RXQGZDOOLVDWULJKWHQGRIFURVVVHFWLRQPRGHOHGE\/ 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
)UHHZD\6RXQGZDOOLVDWULJKWHQGRIFURVVVHFWLRQPRGHOHGE\/ 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
)UHHZD\6RXQGZDOOLVDWULJKWHQGRIFURVVVHFWLRQPRGHOHGE\/ 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
)UHHZD\6RXQGZDOOLVDWULJKWDQGOHIWHQGVRIFURVVVHFWLRQPR 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
)UHHZD\6RXQGZDOOLVDWULJKWDQGOHIWHQGVRIFURVVVHFWLRQPR 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
)UHHZD\6RXQGZDOOLVDWULJKWDQGOHIWHQGVRIFURVVVHFWLRQPR 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6
:6
*URXQG
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6
:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
LQFOXGHGRQO\VROLGSDUWRIUDLOEULGJHEDUULHUDERYHWRSRIUDL 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6
:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
LQFOXGHGRQO\VROLGSDUWRIUDLOEULGJHEDUULHUDERYHWRSRIUDL 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
FRSLHGFKDQQHOIURP

6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
$GGHG&URVVVHFWLRQ86RI3HG%ULGJH
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
$GGHG&URVVVHFWLRQ86RI3HG%ULGJH
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
FKDQQHOIURPGURSSHGLQYHUW
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
8VHGORZHVWLQYHUWVKRWIURPVXUYH\IRUXVDQGGVVLGHIRUDOO 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
8VHGORZHVWLQYHUWVKRWIURPVXUYH\IRUXVDQGGVVLGHIRUDOO 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
FRSLHGFKDQQHOIURPGURSSHGLQYHUW
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
FRSLHGFKDQQHOIURP
XVHGGRZQVWUHDPLQYHUWIURPVXUYH\
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
FRSLHGXVFKDQQHO

EHWZHHQEDQNVWDWLRQV
6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
1R%ULGJH3ODQV$YDLODEOH1RW,QFOXGHGLQ0RGHO),6 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
1R%ULGJH3ODQV$YDLODEOH1RW,QFOXGHGLQ0RGHO),6 6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
FRSLHGIURPFRSLHGXVFKDQQHO

6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

/RZHU(DVWVLGH)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\3ODQ
3URSRVHG
FRSLHGIURPFRSLHGXVFKDQQHO

6WDWLRQ
IW

(OHYDWLRQ
IW

/HJHQG
:6
:6:6
6HGLPHQW)LOO
*URXQG
,QHII
%DQN6WD

LQ+RUL] IWLQ9HUW IW

ATTACHMENT
3 WW
E/y,
WZ
>/D/EZz'
Kd
,E/>Z
WKZd

ATTACHMENT 3
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan Santa Barbara, California
Yeh Project No.: 222-181
October 14, 2022
Prepared for:

Quincy Engineering, Inc.
11017 Cobblerock Drive, Suite 100
Rancho Cordova, California 95670
Attn: Mr. Greg Young, P.E.

Prepared by:

Yeh and Associates, Inc.
56 E. Main Street, Suite 104
Ventura, California 93001
Phone: 805-481-9590 ext. 271
ATTACHMENT 3
56 E. Main Street, Suite 104
Ventura, CA 93001
(805) 481-9590, ext. 271
www.yeh-eng.com
Colorado California
Denver | Colorado Springs | Durango | Glenwood Springs | Grand Junction | Greeley Grover Beach | Ventura Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report
Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan Santa Barbara, California
Yeh Project No.: 222-181
October 14, 2022
Prepared by:

Jamie L. Cravens, P.E. Loree A. Berry, P.E.

Project Engineer Senior Project Manager
Reviewed By:

Jonathan D. Blanchard, P.E., G.E.

Principal Geotechnical Engineer
Copies: Dacé Morgan, P.E. (Quincy)
Loree A. Berry, P.E.

ATTACHMENT 3
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report Yeh Project No. 222-181 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan October 14, 2022 iii
Table of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................ 1

2.1 EXISTING FACILITY .......................................................................................................................... 2

3. GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION ................................................................................................. 3

3.1 PREVIOUS STUDIES ......................................................................................................................... 3

3.2 LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM ...................................................................................................... 3

4. GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... 3

4.1 GEOLOGY ..................................................................................................................................... 3

4.2 SURFACE CONDITIONS..................................................................................................................... 5

4.3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................... 5

4.4 GROUNDWATER ............................................................................................................................ 6

5. AS-BUILT DATA ........................................................................................................................ 6

6. SCOUR DATA ........................................................................................................................... 7

7. CORROSION EVALUATION ....................................................................................................... 7

8. SEISMIC INFORMATION ........................................................................................................... 8

8.1 GROUND MOTION HAZARD ............................................................................................................. 8

8.2 OTHER SEISMIC HAZARDS ................................................................................................................ 9

8.2.1 SURFACE FAULT RUPTURE ............................................................................................................ 9

8.2.2 LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL ........................................................................................................... 9

8.2.3 EFFECTS OF LIQUEFACTION ......................................................................................................... 10

8.2.4 SEISMIC SLOPE STABILITY ........................................................................................................... 10

8.2.5 TSUNAMI RISK ......................................................................................................................... 11

9. PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................. 12

9.1 PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................... 12

9.1.1 SPREAD FOOTINGS ................................................................................................................... 13

9.1.2 DRIVEN PILES .......................................................................................................................... 14

9.1.3 CAST-IN-STEEL-SHELL (CISS) PILES ............................................................................................. 15

9.1.4 CAST-IN-DRILLED-HOLE (CIDH) PILES ......................................................................................... 16

9.1.5 PREFERRED PILE FOR DESIGN ...................................................................................................... 19

10. RECOMMENDED SCOPE OF WORK FOR FINAL DESIGN ............................................................ 19 ATTACHMENT 3
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report Yeh Project No. 222-181 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan October 14, 2022 iv

11. GENERAL CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................... 20

12. REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................... 20 List of Figures
FIGURE 1: PROJECT LOCATION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 FIGURE 2: VIEW OF PROPOSED CROSSING FROM SOUTHBOUND US-101 LOOKING EAST (GOOGLE MAPS 2022) ....................... 2 FIGURE 3: GEOLOGIC MAP (MINOR ET AL. 2009) ............................................................................................................. 4 FIGURE 4: PRELIMINARY ARS CURVE (OBTAINED 7/26/22, SUBJECT TO DATABASE CHANGES) ................................................. 8 FIGURE 5: NHR3 (2022) TSUNAMI HAZARD MAP .......................................................................................................... 11 FIGURE 6: PRELIMINARY FACTORED NOMINAL AXIAL RESISTANCE VERSUS DEPTH FOR DRIVEN PILES - STRENGTH LIMIT STATE ... 15 FIGURE 7: PRELIMINARY FACTORED NOMINAL AXIAL RESISTANCE VERSUS DEPTH FOR CIDH PILES – STRENGTH LIMIT STATE ..... 18 List of Tables
TABLE 1: SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER DATA ................................................................................................................. 6 TABLE 2: SOIL CORROSION TEST SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 7 TABLE 3: PRELIMINARY LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL .......................................................................................................... 10 TABLE 4: SUMMARY OF FUTURE EXPLORATION BY FRAME STRUCTURE ............................................................................... 19 List of Plates
Plate
Existing Field Explorations ............................................................................................................................. 1 List of Appendices
Page
Appendix A – Previous Studies - Boring Logs
Caltrans (1944) Sycamore Creek Bridge ....................................................................................... A-1 Caltrans (2005) Sycamore Creek Bridge Replacement ......................................................... A-2 to 3 Caltrans (2005) Soundwall No. 1 ........................................................................................... A-4 to 5 Caltrans (2005) Soundwall No. 2 ........................................................................................... A-6 to 7 Appendix B – Previous Studies - Results of Laboratory Testing Caltrans (2005) Sycamore Creek Bridge Replacement - Corrosion Test Summary Report .......... B-1

ATTACHMENT 3
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report Yeh Project No. 222-181 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan October 14, 2022 1 1. INTRODUCTION
Yeh was retained by Quincy Engineering, Inc. (Quincy) to provide preliminary geotechnical recommendations as input to the preliminary design of a pedestrian overcrossing at the US-101 Freeway, Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR), and Sycamore Creek as part of the Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan. This report was prepared in accordance with our agreement for professional services with Quincy executed on June 8, 2022, and in general accordance with Caltrans guidelines for a Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report in affect at the time this report was prepared, dated January 2021. The purpose of this report is to provide preliminary geotechnical considerations and
recommendations regarding the
design of the overcrossing
foundations and suitable foundation
alternatives, seismic hazards, scour,
and construction. Preliminary
alignment and design information
for the project was provided by
Quincy (2022). The preliminary
characterization of the subsurface
conditions is based on previous
explorations for the existing
Sycamore Creek Bridge and
soundwall structures for US-101
(Caltrans 1944, Caltrans 2005a
,
Caltrans 2005b). Yeh is also
providing services to Quincy to
review public databases and reports
that are readily available to identify
sites near the project that have
documented soil or groundwater
contamination. A summary of that
research will be provided under separate cover.

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The location of the project is shown in Figure 1. The project consists of the design of improvements to provide pedestrian access between the communities on the Lower Eastside of Santa Barbara to waterfront areas south of the freeway that are separated by the US-101 freeway and Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) corridors. The project mainly consists of providing a new pedestrian pathway from Figure 1: Project Location
ATTACHMENT 3
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report Yeh Project No. 222-181 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan October 14, 2022 2 the intersection of Canada and Pitos Streets on the north side of US-101, continuing south over US101 and the UPRR corridors on to the Santa Barbara Zoo property, continuing west through the parking lot at the Zoo, and over Sycamore Creek to Dwight Murphy Field. The Canada Pedestrian Overcrossing (POC) will be approximately 1,400 feet long (Quincy 2022). We understand from Quincy that the pedestrian overcrossing will consist of three individual frames. This report refers to the frames as: 1) Stacked Ramp Structure (at Canada and Pitos Streets); 2) US-101 Structure (crossing over the US-101 and UPRR corridors); and 3) Sycamore Creek Structure (parallel to US-101 and UPRR and extending west from the Zoo to Sycamore Creek). Ramp structures are anticipated to consist of either cast-in-place or precast concrete and the overcrossing structure may consist of either precast concrete or a steel truss.

2.1 EXISTING FACILITY
The proposed project is located near mile post 12.0 on US-101, approximately 600 feet southwest of the Salinas Street on-ramp (see Figure 1). Figure 2 shows a photo of the proposed crossing location (Google 2022) looking east. The Santa Barbara Zoo and Dwight Murphy Field border the site to the south, and residential properties and the Santa Barbara Sunrise RV Park border the site to the north.

Within the project limits, Caltrans soundwalls No. 1 and 2 border US-101 to the north and the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) borders US-101 to the south. Sycamore Creek runs south along the western extents of the project and crosses under US-101 at the existing Sycamore Creek Bridge.

US-101 right-of-way through the project site is approximately 138 feet wide (Quincy 2022) and consists of 6 approximately 12-foot-wide travel lanes (3 northbound lanes and 3 southbound lanes) with 8- to 10-foot-wide paved shoulders. The UPRR right-of-way through the project site is approximately 76 feet wide and consists of a single track.

Figure 2: View of Proposed Crossing from Southbound US-101 Looking East (Google Maps 2022) ATTACHMENT 3
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report Yeh Project No. 222-181 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan October 14, 2022 3 3. GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION
Explorations performed for previous studies at the project site were reviewed for the purposes of this report. Field exploration at the project site consisted of previous explorations performed by Caltrans for the design of the existing Sycamore Creek Bridge, replacement of the Sycamore Creek Bridge, and design of the existing Soundwalls No. 1 and No. 2 that run along the northbound lane of US-101. Plate 1 presents the locations of the field exploration programs at the project site. Logs of the explorations are presented in Appendix A. A description of the field exploration programs at the project site are described below.

3.1 PREVIOUS STUDIES
Previous explorations pertinent to the project site are included in Appendix A. Pertinent previous field exploration data at the project site included:
x A boring (“Test Hole #1”) performed by Caltrans in 1944 as input for the design of the original Sycamore Creek Bridge for US-101 (Caltrans 1944). The boring was performed to a depth of approximately 43.5 feet below the ground surface (to approximately elevation -36 feet). x Four auger borings (B21-04, B24-04, B29-04, and B34-04) performed by Caltrans in 2004 for Soundwalls No. 1 and 2 for the US-101 widening between kilometer post mile 17.4 to 20.6 (approximately post mile 10.8 to 12.8, Caltrans 2005b). The borings were performed at intervals along the Soundwall No. 1 and 2 locations to depths of approximately 24.5 to 26 feet below the ground surface (approximately elevation -9.8 to -12.4 feet). x Four mud rotary borings (B1-04, B2-04, B13-04, and B18-04) performed by Caltrans in 2005 for the replacement of Sycamore Creek Bridge (Caltrans 2005a). The borings were performed at approximately each corner of the existing bridge prior to its construction to depths of approximately 82.5 to 90 feet below the ground surface (approximately elevation -65.8 to -

73.1 feet).

3.2 LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM
Available laboratory test data from the previous studies discussed in the previous section of this report are presented in Appendix B. Laboratory testing for corrosion was performed on ten of the samples recovered from the borings from the Caltrans (2005) Sycamore Creek Bridge Replacement project. Additional laboratory test results for the previous studies are not available.

4. GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS

4.1 GEOLOGY
The project site is located within the Transverse Ranges geomorphic province, which extends from the Los Angeles Basin westward to Point Arguello. Within the province, the project site lies within an alluvial plain bordered by the Santa Ynez Mountains to the north and the Pacific Ocean to the south.

The province is characterized by east-west trending mountain ranges that are oblique to the general ATTACHMENT 3
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report Yeh Project No. 222-181 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan October 14, 2022 4 north-northwest structural trend of California mountain ranges. The Transvers Ranges province is composed of Cenozoic- to Mesozoic-age sedimentary, volcanic, igneous, and metamorphic rocks.

The regional geology as mapped by Minor et al. (2009) is shown on Figure 3. Minor et al. map the surface geology at the site as Quaternary-age alluvium (Qia, Qac, and Qoa). Geologic structure in the region is generally characterized by a series of east to west trending faults and folds. The closest Quaternary-age fault to the site is the Mission Ridge Fault System, which is mapped by USGS (2022) approximately 0.4 miles northeast of the project site (and shown on Figure 3). Other Quaternary-age faults include the Mesa Fault, Lavigia Fault Zone, Red Mountain Fault Zone, Ortega Hill Fault, and Santa Ynez Fault Zone mapped 1.5 miles southwest of the site, 2.5 miles southwest of the site, 2.7 miles southeast of the site, 3.4 miles east of the site, and 5.5 miles northeast of the site, respectively.

Unnamed anticlines and synclines are mapped by Minor et al. 100 feet southwest of the site and 0.3- mile northeast of the site. Unnamed anticlines are also mapped by Minor et al. within the Mission Ridge Fault System northeast of the site.

Figure 3: Geologic Map (Minor et al. 2009)
ATTACHMENT 3
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report Yeh Project No. 222-181 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan October 14, 2022 5 4.2 SURFACE CONDITIONS
Topography in the site vicinity includes grades of 0- to 3-percent (CalTopo 2022). Sycamore Creek runs south through the project site before its confluence with the Pacific Ocean on East Beach approximately 0.3-miles southeast of US-101. Existing structures in the site vicinity that could impact the project include US-101 and its associated signage, the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR), and Soundwall No. 2 along US-101. Existing overhead and underground utilities and vegetation are present along the north and south sides of US-101.

4.3 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
The following description of the subsurface conditions is based on the previous 1944, 2004, and 2005 field exploration programs conducted by Caltrans in the vicinity of the project site. The subsurface conditions generally appear to consist of units of alluvium and colluvium (Qac), intermediate alluvial deposits (Qia), and older alluvium (Qoa). The approximate locations of the previous borings that have been referenced for the project are shown on Plate 1 and are described as follows.

Alluvium and Colluvium (Qac). The alluvium and colluvium unit was encountered in borings B21-04 and B24-04 (drilled on the northbound side of US101 for Soundwalls No. 1 and 2 and east of the proposed overcrossing) from the ground surface to the maximum depth of those borings, approximately 24.5 to 26 feet below the ground surface (to approximately elevation -9.8 to -10.5 feet). The unit generally consisted of loose to medium dense sand with varying amounts of silt and clay (SW-SM, SP, SP-SM, SM, SC) with alternating lenses and layers up to 6 feet thick of very soft to very stiff sandy lean clay (CL) and soft to very stiff sandy silt (ML).

Intermediate Alluvial Deposits (Qia). Intermediate alluvial deposits were encountered in Test Hole #1, and borings B29-04 and B34-04 (for the previous Sycamore Creek Bridge and Soundwall No. 2 and west of the proposed overcrossing) from the ground surface to the maximum depths explored, approximately 25.5 to 43.5 feet below the ground surface (to approximately elevation -10.6 to -36 feet). The unit was also encountered in borings B1-04, B2-04, B13-04, and B18-04 (for the replacement of Sycamore Creek Bridge west of the proposed overcrossing) from the ground surface to depths of approximately 39.5 to 46 feet below the ground surface (to approximately elevation -

22.2 to -29.3 feet). The intermediate alluvial deposits generally consisted of very loose to medium dense sand with varying amounts of silt, clay, and gravel (SW, SP, SM, SC, SC) with interbedded up to 5-foot-thick layers of stiff to hard lean to fat clay with varying amounts of sand (CL, CH) and soft silt with varying amounts of sand (MH, ML). Older alluvium (Qoa) was encountered below the intermediate alluvial deposits in borings B1-04, B2-04, B13-04, and B18-04.

Older Alluvium (Qoa). Older alluvium was encountered below the intermediate alluvial deposits in borings B1-04, B2-04, B13-04, and B18-04 (for the replacement of Sycamore Creek Bridge west of the ATTACHMENT 3
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report Yeh Project No. 222-181 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan October 14, 2022 6 proposed overcrossing). The unit was encountered to the maximum depths explored, approximately

82.5 to 90 feet below the ground surface (to approximately elevation -65.8 to -73.1 feet). The older alluvium generally consisted of medium dense to very dense sand with varying amounts of silt, clay, and gravel (SP, SW, SP-SM, SM, SC) with interbedded up to 13-foot-thick layers of hard lean to fat clay with varying amounts of sand (CH, CL). Slight cementation was noted at various depths in borings B1- 04 and B18-04 within the older alluvium.

4.4 GROUNDWATER
A summary of the groundwater levels encountered in each of the previous studies is presented in Table 1. Groundwater levels and soil moisture conditions will vary seasonally and in association with changes in precipitation, runoff, irrigation, pumping, and other factors. Based on the FEMA (2022) Flood Map for the project site, the vicinity is within a “Zone AE” special flood management area with a base flood elevation of approximately 18 feet.

Table 1: Summary of Groundwater Data
Boring ID Location
Ground
Surface
Elevation
(feet)
Depth to
Groundwater
(feet)
Groundwater
Elevation
(feet)
Date
Measured
Test Hole #1 Sycamore Creek Bridge, NB side of
Highway 101 7.5 1.5 6.0 8/1944
B1-04 Sycamore Creek Bridge, SE corner of
bridge 16.7 6.5 10.0

10.2 6.7
5/4/2004
5/25/2004
B2-04 Sycamore Creek Bridge, SW corner
of bridge 17.3 -- -- 5/3/2004
B13-04 Sycamore Creek Bridge, NE corner
of bridge 16.9
(Wet sample at 70
feet, no
groundwater noted)
-- 5/11/2004
B18-04 Sycamore Creek Bridge, NW corner
of bridge 17.3 -- -- 5/12/2004
B21-04 Soundwall No. 1, W side 16.2 8.0 8.2 5/11/2004
B24-04 Soundwall No. 2, near Canada
Street 14.0 13.0 1.0 5/12/2004
B29-04 Soundwall No. 2, W of Sycamore
Creek Bridge 14.9 9.0 5.9 5/13/2004
B34-04 Soundwall No. 2, between Canada
Street and Sycamore Creek Bridge 13.6 6.3 7.3 5/18/2004

5. AS-BUILT DATA
Available as-built data considered in this study included the final foundation report (Caltrans 2004) and pile driving records (Caltrans 2008) for the replacement of Sycamore Creek Bridge as well as the as-built plans (Caltrans 2005b) for Soundwalls No. 1 and No. 2 along the northbound side of US-101.

Sycamore Creek Bridge is supported on 18-inch diameter by ½-inch wall thickness (PP457x12.70) Cast-in-Steel-Shell (CISS) piles embedded to approximately elevation -28 feet and designed with nominal compressional resistances of approximately 280 kips. The wing walls for the Sycamore Creek ATTACHMENT 3
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report Yeh Project No. 222-181 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan October 14, 2022 7 Bridge are supported on standard Class 400 driven piles embedded to approximately elevation -24.5 feet and designed with nominal compressional resistances of approximately 180 kips. Soundwall No. 1 is supported by both Class 400 driven piles embedded to approximately elevation -4 feet as well as trench footing foundations embedded to an unknown depth “D”. Soundwall No. 2 is supported by trench footing foundations embedded approximately 6.5 feet below the ground surface. Design foundation capacities for Soundwalls No. 1 and No. 2 as well as additional as-built information for US101, UPRR, or the Sycamore Creek Bridge were not available.

6. SCOUR DATA
Preliminary scour data for the proposed Sycamore Creek crossing is not available. The final Foundation Report will include scour data for the project. The existing Sycamore Creek Bridge for US101 was designed for a scour elevation of approximately 2.3 feet.

7. CORROSION EVALUATION
Nine soil samples and one water sample were taken for corrosion testing from the Caltrans (2005a) borings for the Sycamore Creek Bridge Replacement. Results for pH, resistivity, soluble sulfate content, and soluble chloride content were reported for the samples tested. A copy of those corrosion test results is presented in Appendix B and summarized in Table 2 below.

Caltrans (2019a) Amendments states that “a site is considered to be corrosive if one or more of the following conditions exist for the representative soil and/or water samples taken at the site: chloride concentration is 500 ppm or greater, sulfate concentration is 1,500 ppm or greater, or the pH is 5.5 or less.” The soil samples tested are not considered corrosive based on Caltrans test methods and standards (Caltrans 2021).

Table 2: Soil Corrosion Test Summary
Boring ID
Elevation
(feet)
Minimum
Resistivity
(Ohm-cm) pH
Chloride
Content
(ppm)
Sulfate
Content
(ppm)
Corrosive
Status
B1-04 #1 16.7 to 10.2 2,000 8.08 -- -- No
B1-04 #7 -3.3 to -4.8 1,200 7.41 -- -- No
B1-04 #11 -10.8 to -14.8 3,300 7.62 -- -- No
B1-04 #17 -26.3 to -29.8 3,100 7.46 -- -- No
B1-04 #21 -36.3 to -39.8 970 7.28 16 27 No
B1-04 #26 -51.3 to -54.3 3,200 7.53 -- -- No
B13-04 “A” 9.6 to 6.0 3,100 7.40 -- -- No
B13-04 “E” -10.5 to -14.0 2,300 6.59 -- -- No
ATTACHMENT 3
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report Yeh Project No. 222-181 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan October 14, 2022 8 Boring ID
Elevation
(feet)
Minimum
Resistivity
(Ohm-cm) pH
Chloride
Content
(ppm)
Sulfate
Content
(ppm)
Corrosive
Status
B13-04 “I” -30.5 to -32.1 2,600 6.78 -- -- No
B1-04 (Well
Water Sample) 10.1 300 7.30 87 204 No

8. SEISMIC INFORMATION

8.1 GROUND MOTION HAZARD
Figure 4 presents the preliminary design response spectrum for the site estimated using Caltrans (2022) ARS Online (accessed July 26, 2022) and guidelines set forth in Appendix B of the Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria (Caltrans 2019b). The SDC defines the design earthquake as corresponding to an event having a 5-percent probability of exceedance in 50 years (975-year return period). The site coordinates were estimated as 34.4208 degrees latitude and -119.6679 degrees longitude.

Subsurface data from the 2004 Caltrans borings for the Sycamore Creek Bridge Replacement and design of Soundwalls No. 1 and 2 along US-101 was used to estimate an average shear wave velocity Figure 4: Preliminary ARS Curve (obtained 7/26/22, subject to database changes) ATTACHMENT 3
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report Yeh Project No. 222-181 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan October 14, 2022 9 of 780 feet per second (240 meters per second) for the upper 100 feet of the soil and rock at the site, corresponding to Site Class D defined in Appendix B of the Seismic Design Criteria. The design earthquake is estimated to have a mean magnitude of 6.9, a mean site to source distance of approximately 7.3 miles (11.7 kilometers), and results in a peak ground acceleration of approximately

0.65g at the project site. The alluvium (Qac and Qia) is classified as S2 soil based on Section 6.1 of the Seismic Design Criteria. The older alluvium (Qoa) is classified as S1 soil.

8.2 OTHER SEISMIC HAZARDS

8.2.1 SURFACE FAULT RUPTURE
The project site is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. No known active or potentially active faults are mapped through the site. Therefore, no special design considerations are needed to address fault rupture.

8.2.2 LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL
Liquefaction is the loss of soil strength due to an increase in soil porewater pressure resulting from seismic ground shaking. Liquefaction typically occurs in loose to medium dense granular soil that is below the water table. The extent and severity of liquefaction is dependent upon the intensity and duration of the strong ground motion. Evaluation of liquefaction potential is needed to assess the impact of adverse subsurface conditions on structures during earthquakes. These include increased lateral loads on piles and abutments due to lateral spreading along slopes and negative skin friction on piles due to settlement. The site is mapped as being underlain by units of alluvium consistent with the subsurface conditions encountered in the previous Caltrans borings. The liquefaction potential of the alluvium was preliminarily evaluated using the previous boring data and NCEER (Youd and Idriss 2001) guidelines in consideration of Caltrans (2020) guidelines for evaluating liquefaction. Selected units of alluvium encountered in the previous boring are considered liquefiable for the design earthquake based on the preliminary analyses. A summary of soil layers that were preliminarily estimated to be liquefiable are presented in Table 3. Special recommendations are needed for design to address liquefaction or seismic related hazards for such structures or improvements.

ATTACHMENT 3
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report Yeh Project No. 222-181 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan October 14, 2022 10 Table 3: Preliminary Liquefaction Potential
Location or
Boring ID USCS
Ground
Surface
Elevation
(feet)
Depth to
Groundwater
(feet)
Groundwater
Elevation
(feet)
Estimated
Factor of
Safety
(CSR/CSRreq)
Potential
Liquefiable
Layer Depths
(feet)
Potential
Liquefiable
Layer
Elevations
(feet)
B1-04 SC, SM, SP
SC 16.7 6.5 10.0

10.2 6.7

0.20 to 0.93

0.69 6.5 to 46
71 to 73.5

10.2 to -29.3
-54.3 to -56.8
B2-04
SM, SC
SP
SP

17.3 -- --

0.66 to 0.68

0.85 0.76
13 to 22.5
32 to 36
49 to 49.5

4.3 to -5.2
-14.7 to -18.7
-31.7 to -32.2
B13-04 SM 16.9
(Wet sample
at 70 feet, no
groundwater
noted)
-- 0.54 to 0.91 25.5 to 35.5 -8.6 to -18.6
B18-04 SM 17.3 -- -- 0.86 36 to 41 -18.7 to -23.7
B21-04
SP-SM
SP-SM, SWSM 16.2 8.0 8.2 0.46 to 0.68

0.17 to 0.63
5 to 8
8 to 24

11.2 to 8.2

8.2 to -7.8
B24-04 SP 14.0 13.0 1.0 0.38 19.5 to 24.5 -5.5 to -10.5 B29-04 SM
SP, SC 14.9 9.0 5.9 0.5 to 0.63

0.63 to 0.83

2.5 to 9
9 to 15

25.5 to 26

12.4 to 5.9

5.9 to -0.1
-10.6 to -11.1
B34-04 SM, SC
SW-SC 13.6 6.3 7.3 0.34 to 0.56 0.64

2.5 to 7.5

14.5 to 19.5

11.1 to 6.1
-0.9 to -5.9
Note: Values in table show potentially liquefiable layers if those layers are below the groundwater table. Groundwater was not recorded in all reviewed borings.

Potentially liquefiable soil will likely be encountered below the proposed pedestrian overcrossing and should be further evaluated and addressed as part of a subsequent design-level field exploration program and reporting for the project. The Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria specifies that liquefiable soils are classified as Site Class F and require site-specific seismic analyses. The field exploration program for the new overcrossing should include Cone Penetration Testing to help characterize the subsurface conditions and liquefaction potential below the site.

8.2.3 EFFECTS OF LIQUEFACTION
Potentially liquefiable soil conditions should be considered in subsequent geotechnical exploration and analysis for the project based on our preliminary analyses and should be considered in the design of the overcrossing foundations. Estimation of the liquefaction potential and effects of liquefaction (such as seismic settlement, seismically induced downdrag, and lateral spreading) should be considered within the scope of the Foundation Report prepared for design.

8.2.4 SEISMIC SLOPE STABILITY
The project will likely not involve high embankments or steep slopes that would be considered vulnerable to slope instability or lateral spreading. Seismic slope stability analysis should be performed for applicable slopes that are part of the proposed design as part of the final Foundation Report.

ATTACHMENT 3
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report Yeh Project No. 222-181 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan October 14, 2022 11 8.2.5 TSUNAMI RISK
Tsunamis are long-period sea waves formed during seismic events or submarine landslides. Tsunamis behave like a tidal surge that can result in run-ups, or bores, extending up streams, rivers, and creeks and inundating coastal areas. The site is located approximately elevation 12 to 17 feet above sea level and 0.3-miles north of the shoreline of the Pacific Ocean. Sycamore Creek runs through the project site and west of the proposed overcrossing. Potential tsunami hazards were considered for the project in accordance with Caltrans Memo to Designers (Caltrans 2010). Tsunami loading can be estimated by the AASHTO Guide Specifications for Bridges Subjected to Tsunami Effects (AASHTO 2022). The estimated limits of tsunami inundation for a 1,000-year return event are shown on the Natural Hazards Risk and Resiliency Research Center Tsunami Inundation Portal (NHR3 2022) and presented on Figure 5 relative to the project site.

Figure 5: NHR3 (2022) Tsunami Hazard Map
ATTACHMENT 3
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report Yeh Project No. 222-181 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan October 14, 2022 12 9. PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

9.1 PRELIMINARY FOUNDATION CONSIDERATIONS
Foundation alternatives for proposed crossing includes spread footings, driven piles, cast-in-steelshell (CISS) piles, and cast-in-drilled-hole (CIDH) piles. Considerations for each alternative are presented below. The following are key geotechnical considerations that will influence the foundation design and selection of the foundation type selection for the new pedestrian overcrossing:
x Relatively shallow groundwater and alluvium composed of interbedded layers of loose to medium dense sand and very soft to stiff silt and clay were encountered in the previous Caltrans (1944, 2005) borings drilled near the project site. The alluvium was underlain by older alluvium units at depths of approximately 40 to 46 feet below the highway that were composed of interbedded layers of medium dense to very dense sand and hard clay. x Sand layers within the alluvium that were encountered in the previous borings were potentially liquefiable under the design earthquake based on preliminary analyses. Additional exploration and analyses are needed to characterize the liquefaction potential and provide specific recommendations that will be needed for design to address liquefaction, seismic settlement, loss of foundation support, or seismic related hazards for the proposed structure and associated foundations.
x Shallow foundations will be vulnerable to liquefaction and static and seismic settlement within the younger alluvium. The older alluvium had a low potential for liquefaction and is the likely bearing material for deep foundation alternatives considered in this report. x The subsurface soil is not considered corrosive based on testing for previous studies. x The proposed structure will cross Sycamore Creek. Scour may need to be considered for design of the foundations for the proposed crossing.
x The construction footprint and final layout for the proposed crossing foundations is constrained spatially between the Santa Barbara Zoo parking lot to the south, Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR), US-101, and the residential neighborhood to the north. Considerations for spatial constraint will be needed for both construction and final layout of the proposed structure and foundations.
x Existing overhead lines and utilities were observed on the north and south sides of US-101 during Yeh’s 2022 site visit. Underground utilities are also likely present within the area on the northern side of US-101 within the residential neighborhood, as well as underground reclaimed water lines on the south side of US-101. Locations of any existing utilities at the site should be considered relative to overcrossing construction, foundation drilling, or pile driving.

The utilities may need to be taken out of service or relocated to allow for staging and construction of the overcrossing and foundations. Existing vegetation is also present within the Santa Barbara Zoo parking lot on the south side of US-101. This vegetation will likely need to be removed to allow for pile driving or foundation excavation. x Soil and groundwater in the project vicinity may be potentially contaminated based on previous Yeh project experience in the area and experience working near railroad corridors.

ATTACHMENT 3
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report Yeh Project No. 222-181 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan October 14, 2022 13 Selection of foundation alternatives should consider the need to test and dispose of soil and drilling cuttings and the potential for contamination.

9.1.1 SPREAD FOOTINGS
Spread footings would likely bear within 5 to 8 feet of existing site grades in soft clay or loose sand within the upper units of the alluvium (Qac, Qia). Groundwater was encountered at about 6 to 13 feet below the ground surface. Design of spread footings should consider bearing resistance, initial and post-construction settlement of soft clay, potential scour along Sycamore Creek, the potential for liquefaction of the alluvium to compromise support of shallow foundations, and spatial constraints for excavation and construction of the footings. Benefits of the use of spread footings as a foundation alternative would include:
x Potential reduced cost of construction compared to other foundation methods if footings can be constructed in the dry without excessive shoring, ground modification or dewatering, and x Spread footings are a conventional foundation type (no specialty contractors needed).

Constraints and considerations that could adversely impact the cost and feasibility of supporting the proposed overcrossing on spread footings foundations include:
x Long term settlement and consolidation within clay layers that would require pre-loading, settlement waiting periods, or ground modification to support the anticipated foundation loads;
x Ground modification may be needed to resist scour, liquefaction, settlement, lateral spreading or strengthen the alluvium to provide adequate support for spread footings; x Dewatering, shoring, and subgrade stabilization would be needed if footings are to be constructed below groundwater;
x May involve soil disposal for the excavated material that may encounter contaminated soil or groundwater conditions.
x Shoring with adequate lateral support systems may be needed to avoid potential impacts to the US-101 and UPRR rights-of-way and avoid settlement of existing facilities and utilities that may be present along the railroad lines; and
x Spread footings may need a footprint larger than the pile cap for deep foundation to accommodate higher loading, if anticipated.

The design and construction of spread footing foundation seems relatively complex and with risks for unanticipated costs associated with the compressibility and liquefaction potential of the foundation support soil, shallow groundwater, spatial constraints along the UPRR right of way, and performance to seismic hazards or scour compared to deep foundations. Spread footing are not recommended for design of the overcrossing foundations based on the preliminary analyses and review of previous geotechnical data.

ATTACHMENT 3
Structure Preliminary Geotechnical Report Yeh Project No. 222-181 Lower Eastside Community Connectivity Active Transportation Plan October 14, 2022 14 9.1.2 DRIVEN PILES
Driven piles would typically consist of Caltrans standard plan steel pipe or square precast concrete piles or nonstandard H-piles. Driven Class 400 concrete piles were used for the support of Soundwall No. 1 east of the project site as well as the wing walls for the Sycamore Creek Bridge. Driven piles would likely need to develop end and frictional resistance within the older alluvium and below approximately el. -25 feet to provide suitable support for the new overcrossing.

Santa Barbara City CouncilFebruary 13, 2024

Santa Barbara City Council
February 13, 2024