Agenda packet, first session — Santa Barbara City Council, May 7, 2024

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

CITY COUNCIL
Randy Rowse
Mayor
Sarah J. Knecht
Interim City Administrator
Mike Jordan
Mayor Pro Tempore
Mike Jordan
Ordinance Committee Chair
Tava Ostrenger
Acting City Attorney
Alejandra Gutierrez
Finance Committee Chair
Eric Friedman
Oscar Gutierrez
Meagan Harmon
Kristen W. Sneddon
City Hall
735 Anacapa Street
http://www.SantaBarbaraCA.gov
MAY 7, 2024, 2:00 PM
AGENDA
IN-PERSON PUBLIC COMMENT: At the beginning of each meeting of the City Council, Finance Committee, or Ordinance Committee, any member of the public may address the City Council concerning any item not on the Council's agenda. Any person wishing to make such address should first complete and deliver a "Request to Speak" form prior to the time that public comment is taken up by the City Council. Each speaker will be given a total of 3 minutes to address the Council. Pooling of time is not allowed during general public comment. The time allotted for general public comment at the beginning of the 2:00 p.m. session is 30 minutes.

Any member of the public who did not speak during the 2:00 p.m. session but who submitted a request to do so during the 2:00 p.m. 30 minute session may do so at the end of the meeting when the additional “Public Comment (If Necessary)” is announced. The City Council, upon majority vote, may decline to hear a speaker on the grounds that the subject matter is beyond their jurisdiction.

REMOTE PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the public wishing to speak must “raise their hand” in the Zoom platform by selecting the virtual hand icon when their item is called. The keyboard shortcut for this is Alt+Y for Windows and Option+Y for Macs. City staff will activate the speaker’s microphone when the speaker’s name is called. The speaker will then need to unmute themselves. The keyboard shortcut for this is Alt+M for Windows or Command-Shift-A for Macs.

HOW TO REMOTELY OBSERVE AND/OR SPEAK LIVE AT A MEETING
• Web: https://santabarbaraca-gov.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_JJS2kazqRyu2i83tshCkPw (Participation via Zoom)
• Telephone: Dial 1-669-900-6833, Enter Webinar ID: 894 2384 2846 (press *9 to raise/lower hand; press *6 to mute/unmute) • Online Streaming: Council meetings are streamed live at www.SantaBarbaraCA.gov/CAP • TV: Each regular City Council meeting is broadcast live in English and Spanish on City TV Channel 18 and rebroadcast in English on Wednesdays and Thursdays at 7:00 p.m. and Saturdays at 8:00 a.m., and in Spanish on Sundays at 3:00 p.m.

Each televised Council meeting is closed captioned for the hearing impaired. Check the City TV program guide at www.santabarbaraca.gov/citytv for rebroadcasts of Finance and Ordinance Committee meetings.

WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT: Public comments may also be submitted via email to [email protected] prior to the beginning of the Council Meeting. All public comments submitted via email will be provided to City Council and will become part of the public record.
(CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE)
ORDER OF BUSINESS: Regular meetings of the Finance Committee and the Ordinance Committee begin at 12:00 p.m. The regular City Council meeting begins at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall.

REPORTS: Copies of the reports relating to agenda items are available for review at http://www.SantaBarbaraCA.gov/CAP.In accordance with state law requirements, this agenda generally contains only a brief general description of each item of business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting. Should you wish more detailed information regarding any particular agenda item, you are encouraged to obtain a copy of the Council Agenda Report (a "CAR") online at the City's website (http://www.SantaBarbaraCA.gov/CAP). Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are posted to the City’s website as soon as reasonably feasible.

CONSENT CALENDAR: The Consent Calendar is comprised of items that will not usually require discussion by the City Council. A Consent Calendar item is open for discussion by the City Council upon request of a Councilmember, City staff, or member of the public. Items on the Consent Calendar may be approved by a single motion. Should you wish to comment on an item listed on the Consent Agenda, after turning in your "Request to Speak" form, you should come forward to speak or raise your hand in Zoom at the time the Council considers the Consent Calendar.

SPANISH INTERPRETATION: If you need interpretation of your communications to Council from Spanish into English, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 564-5309 or by email at [email protected]. If possible, notification of at least 48 hours will usually enable the City to make arrangements.

INTERPRETACIÓN EN ESPAÑOL: Si necesita una interpretación del español al inglés, para sus comunicaciones al Consejo, comuníquese con la Oficina del Secretario Municipal al 564-5309, o por correo electrónico a [email protected]. Si es posible, la notificación de al menos 48 horas generalmente permitirá a la Ciudad hacer los arreglos.

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: If you need auxiliary aids or services or staff assistance to attend or participate in this meeting, please contact the City Administrator's Office at 564-5305 or by email at [email protected]. If possible, notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will usually enable the City to make reasonable arrangements. For those who need accessibility accommodation in using the “raise hand” function and/or registering to participate in the Zoom session, please contact the Clerk’s office by 5:00 p.m. the day before the meeting for assistance. Additionally, a speaker may email [email protected] by 5:00 p.m. the day before a meeting, stating which item they wish to speak on. Specialized services, such as sign language interpretation or documents in Braille, may require additional lead time to arrange. 05/07/2024 Santa Barbara City Council Proposed Final Agenda Page 1 MAY 7, 2024 AGENDA
FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING - 12:00 P.M. IN THE DAVID GEBHARD PUBLIC MEETING ROOM, 630 GARDEN STREET (120.03)

1. Subject: Finance Committee Review Of The Fiscal Year 2025 Recommended Budget (120.03)
Recommendation: That Finance Committee hear a report from staff in connection with the Recommended Budget for Fiscal Year 2025.
05/07/2024 Santa Barbara City Council Proposed Final Agenda Page 2 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - 2:00 P.M.

CALL TO ORDER

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

CEREMONIAL ITEMS

1. Subject: Employee Recognition – Service Award Pins (120.04) Recommendation: That Council authorize the City Administrator to express the City’s appreciation to employees who are eligible to receive service award pins for their years of service through May 31, 2024.

2. Subject: Professional Municipal Clerks Week, May 5-11, 2024 (120.04)

CHANGES TO THE AGENDA

CONSENT CALENDAR

3. Subject: Increase in Construction Change Order Authority for the Central Library Renovation Project [Resolution; Agreement] (570.04) Recommendation: That Council:

A. Authorize an increase in the Public Works Director’s Change Order Authority to approve expenditures for extra work for the Central Library Renovation Project with Nationwide General Contracting Services Inc., Contract No. 28,050, in the amount of $850,000, for a total project expenditure authority of $11,426,525;
B. Authorize the Public Works Director to execute the Third Amendment to the City Professional Services Contract No. 22300162 with TynanGroup, LP, in the amount of $99,160 for construction management services, for a total contract amount of $367,785;
C. Authorize the Public Works Director to execute the First Amendment to the City Professional Services Contract No. 22300187 with Pacific Materials Laboratory of Santa Barbara, Inc. in the amount of $32,305 for construction inspection services, for a total contract amount of $52,285; and D. Adopt, by reading of title only, a Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending Resolution No. 23-076, Adopting the Budget for 05/07/2024 Santa Barbara City Council Proposed Final Agenda Page 3 Fiscal Year 2024, to Appropriate Funds for the Central Library Renovation Project.

4. Subject: Set a Date for Public Hearing Regarding Renewal of Levy for Fiscal Year 2025 for the Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment District [Resolution] (290.00)
Recommendation: That Council adopt, by reading of title only, A Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Declaring its Intention to Continue the Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment within the Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones; Declaring the Work to be of More Than General or Ordinary Benefit and Describing the District to be Assessed to Pay the Costs and Expenses Thereof; Preliminarily Approving the Updated Engineer’s Report; Stating Intention to Continue Assessments for Fiscal Year 2025 and Establishing a Time of 2:00 P.M. on Tuesday May 21, 2024, in the City Council Chambers for a Public Hearing on the Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment.

5. Subject: Termination of Local Emergency Declaration [Resolution] (520.02) Recommendation: That Council adopt, by reading of title only, a Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Terminating the Declaration of Local Emergency Pursuant to Government Code Section 8630 Proclaimed by the Director of Emergency Services on February 1, 2024 and Ratified by the City Council on February 6, 2024.

6. Subject: WaterSMART Grant Acceptance for Water-Wise Landscape Rebate Program [Resolution] (540.05)
Recommendation: That Council adopt, by reading of title only, A Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending Resolution No. 23-076, Adopting the Budget for Fiscal Year 2024, to Appropriate Funds for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation WaterSMART Grant for the Water-Wise Landscape Rebate Program.

7. Subject: Joint Powers Agreement with Santa Barbara County Association of Governments for Facilitating Regional Broadband Planning [Agreement] (150.03)
Recommendation: That Council authorize the Interim City Administrator to execute the second amendment of the Joint Powers Agreement with the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments related to facilitating regional broadband planning.

PUBLIC COMMENT

PULLED CONSENT ITEMS
05/07/2024 Santa Barbara City Council Proposed Final Agenda Page 4

COUNCILMEMBER COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENT REPORTS

CITY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE AND ATTORNEY REPORTS

MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS

8. Subject: Interviews for City Advisory Groups (140.05) Recommendation: That Council hold interviews of applicants to various City Advisory Groups (Estimated time: 3:00 p.m.).

COUNCIL AND STAFF COMMUNICATIONS

COUNCILMEMBER ENGAGEMENTS

PUBLIC COMMENT (IF NECESSARY)

ADJOURNMENT

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING

MEETING AGENDA
DATE: May 7, 2024 Alejandra Gutierrez, Chair
TIME: 12:00 PM Eric Friedman
PLACE: David Gebhard Public Meeting Room Meagan Harmon
630 Garden Street
Sarah Knecht Keith DeMartini
Interim City Administrator Finance Director
Members of the public may participate in person or via Zoom. Zoom instructions are below.  Web: (Participation via Zoom) Register in advance for this webinar:
https://santabarbaraca-gov.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_NxgDy8LgTUyb1qjr_OY6wg Webinar ID: 869 8282 0542
Passcode: 438805
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar.
 Telephone: Dial 1-669-900-6833, Enter Webinar ID: 869 8282 0542 (press *9 to raise/lower hand; press *6 to mute/unmute) REMOTE PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the public wishing to speak must “raise their hand” in the Zoom platform by selecting the virtual hand icon when their item is called. The keyboard shortcut for this is Alt+Y for Windows and Option+Y for Macs. City staff will activate the speaker’s microphone when the speaker’s name is called. The speaker will then need to unmute themselves.

The keyboard shortcut for this is Alt+M for Windows or Command-Shift-A for Macs.

For those who need accessibility accommodation in using the “raise hand” function and/or registering to participate in the Zoom session, please contact the Finance Department by 5:00 p.m. the day before the meeting for assistance. Additionally, a speaker may email [email protected] by 5:00 p.m. the day before a meeting, stating the item on which they wish to speak.

ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION:

Subject: Finance Committee Review of the Fiscal Year 2025 Recommended Budget Recommendation: That Finance Committee hear a report from staff in connection with the Recommended Budget for Fiscal Year 2025.

File Code No. 120.03

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

FINANCE COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: May 7, 2024
TO: Finance Committee
FROM: Budget Division, Finance Department
SUBJECT: Finance Committee Review of the Fiscal Year 2025 Recommended Budget
RECOMMENDATION:

That Finance Committee hear a report from staff in connection with the Recommended Budget for Fiscal Year 2025.

DISCUSSION:

On Tuesday, April 23, 2024, the Recommended Budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 was submitted to Council. Council heard an overview of the budget and approved the Schedule of Council Budget Review Meetings and Public Hearings. Departmental proposed material changes from the second year of the FY20204 and FY2025 two-year financial plan will be presented to the Finance Committee. Topics include major revenue and expenditure changes, capital projects, fee changes, and other program-related changes.

The public can access the City Administrator’s Recommended Budget for FY2024 and FY2025 on the online budget tool at https://SantaBarbaraCA.gov/Budget or clicking here.

ATTACHMENT: Proposed Council Budget Review Schedule for Fiscal Year 2025 PREPARED BY: Natalija Glusac, Budget Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Keith DeMartini, Finance Director
APPROVED BY: City Administrator's Office
File Code No. 120.03

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Budget Hearing Schedule - Fiscal Year 2025
PROPOSED Schedule of ALL Budget Review Meetings & Public Hearings Please Note: Meeting dates and times are subject to change on short notice.

MEETING DATE BUDGET AGENDA ITEM(S)

CITY COUNCIL

RETREAT
Thursday, November 30,
2023
– Budget Hearing Schedule

FINANCE

COMMITTEE

MEETING
Tuesday, February 27,
2024
12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.

David Gebhard Room
– Notice of Prop. 218 Hearing on Water &
Wastewater Rates: Revenue Requirement

REGULAR CITY

COUNCIL MEETING
Tuesday, February 27,
2024
– Water & Wastewater Rates: Preliminary Rate
Study Findings

SPECIAL BUDGET

WORK SESSION
Tuesday, March 5, 2024
9:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m.
– Overview of Objectives & Priorities
– Budgetary Challenges & Vision 2030
– Budget Process & Calendar
– General Fund Multi-Year Forecast
– Department Priorities

FINANCE

COMMITTEE

MEETING
Tuesday, April 9, 2024
12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.

David Gebhard Room
– Water, Wastewater, & Solid Waste Rates

REGULAR CITY
COUNCIL MEETING:

PUBLIC HEARING
Tuesday, April 9, 2024
Afternoon session – Water, Wastewater, & Solid Waste Rates

REGULAR CITY
COUNCIL MEETING:

PUBLIC HEARING
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
Afternoon session
– Filing of the Recommended Operating &
Capital Budget for Fiscal Year 2025
– Schedule of Budget Work Sessions & Public
Hearings Approved
– Overview of Recommended Budget

FINANCE

COMMITTEE

MEETING
Tuesday, April 30, 2024
12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.

David Gebhard Room
– Downtown Parking Rate Restructure Proposal

FINANCE

COMMITTEE

MEETING
Tuesday, May 7, 2024
12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m.

David Gebhard Room
– Overview of Recommended Operating &
Capital Budget for Fiscal Year 2025

ATTACHMENT

REGULAR CITY
COUNCIL MEETING:

BUDGET WORK

SESSION &

PUBLIC HEARING
Tuesday, May 14, 2024
Afternoon session
General Fund & related Capital Budget
Presentation
• City Administrator
• City Attorney
• Community Development
• Finance
• Fire Department
• Human Resources
• Library
• Parks & Recreation
• Police Department
• Public Works (Admin. & General Services)
• General Fund Capital & Measure C Capital

SPECIAL CITY
COUNCIL MEETING:

BUDGET WORK

SESSION &

PUBLIC HEARING
Wednesday, May 15,
2024
1:00 pm. – 5:00 p.m.

Enterprise Fund & related Capital Budget
Presentation
• Public Works (Downtown Parking)

REGULAR CITY
COUNCIL MEETING:

BUDGET WORK

SESSION &

PUBLIC HEARING
Tuesday, May 21, 2024
Afternoon session
Enterprise Fund, Internal Service Funds, Special
Funds & related Capital Budget Presentation
• Airport
• Community Development (City Affordable
Housing, Community Development Block
Grant, Federal Home Loan Program,
Permanent Local Housing Allocation, Local
Housing Trust Fund)
• Finance (Self Insurance)
• Information Technology
• Parks & Recreation (Golf Fund)
• Public Works (Engineering, Fleet, Facilities,
Streets, Measure A, Water, Wastewater)
• Sustainability & Resilience (Santa Barbara
Clean Energy, Creeks, Solid Waste, Street
Sweeping)
• Waterfront

REGULAR CITY
COUNCIL MEETING:

PUBLIC HEARING
Tuesday, June 4, 2024
Afternoon session – Budget Deliberations

REGULAR CITY
COUNCIL MEETING:

PUBLIC HEARING
Tuesday, June 11, 2024
Afternoon session – Budget Adoption

REGULAR CITY
COUNCIL MEETING:

PUBLIC HEARING
Tuesday, June 25, 2024
Afternoon session
– Prop. 218 Hearing on proposed Water,
Wastewater, & Solid Waste Rates

REGULAR CITY
COUNCIL MEETING:

PUBLIC HEARING
Tuesday, July 2, 2024
Afternoon session
– Water, Wastewater, & Solid Waste Rate
Adoption

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: May 7, 2024
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: City Administrator’s Office
SUBJECT: Employee Recognition – Service Award Pins
RECOMMENDATION:

That Council authorize the City Administrator to express the City’s appreciation to employees who are eligible to receive service award pins for their years of service through May 31, 2024.

DISCUSSION:

The City appreciates the loyalty to the community and the dedication to public service that are demonstrated by City employees throughout the organization every day. Since 1980, the City Employees’ Recognition Program has recognized length of City Service. Service award pins are presented to employees for every five years of service. Those employees achieving 25 years of service or more are eligible to receive their pins in front of the City Council.

Attached is a list of those employees who will be awarded pins for their service through May 31, 2024.

ATTACHMENT(S): May 2024 Service Awards
PREPARED BY: Talhia Dorado, Administrative Specialist
SUBMITTED BY: Sarah J Knecht, Interim City Administrator APPROVED BY: City Administrator's Office
Agenda Item No. 1
File Code No. 120.04

ATTACHMENT
May 2024 SERVICE AWARDS
May 7, 2024 Council Meeting
5 Years
William Russell, Assistant Planner, Community Development Department 10 YEARS
Bradley Klinzing, Supervising Engineer, Public Works Department 15 YEARS
Rebecca Klarich, Public Safety Dispatcher III, Police Department 20 YEARS
Jose Torres, Water Distribution Operator Technician II, Public Works Department 25 YEARS
Deane Carr, Water Treatment Plant Operator III, Public Works Department Agenda Item No. 2
File Code No. 120.04

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: May 7, 2024
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Engineering Division, Public Works Department
SUBJECT: Increase in Construction Change Order Authority for the Central Library Renovation Project [Resolution; Agreement]
RECOMMENDATION: That Council:

A. Authorize an increase in the Public Works Director’s Change Order Authority to approve expenditures for extra work for the Central Library Renovation Project with Nationwide General Contracting Services Inc., Contract No. 28,050, in the amount of $850,000, for a total project expenditure authority of $11,426,525; B. Authorize the Public Works Director to execute the Third Amendment to the City Professional Services Contract No. 22300162 with TynanGroup, LP, in the amount of $99,160 for construction management services, for a total contract amount of $367,785;
C. Authorize the Public Works Director to execute the First Amendment to the City Professional Services Contract No. 22300187 with Pacific Materials Laboratory of Santa Barbara, Inc. in the amount of $32,305 for construction inspection services, for a total contract amount of $52,285; and
D. Adopt, by reading of title only, a Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending Resolution No. 23-076, Adopting the Budget for Fiscal Year 2024, to Appropriate Funds for the Central Library Renovation Project.

DISCUSSION:

Background
On March 29, 2022, Council authorized a construction contract with Nationwide Construction, Inc. for the Central Library Renovation Project (Project). The Project is comprised of a full renovation of the Library’s exterior plaza, installation of a new, fully compliant Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) elevator, and the renovation of the lowerlevel staff area. Project improvements will enhance the Library’s programming capabilities, and remove the ADA barriers in accordance with the City of Santa Barbara’s (City) ADA Transition Plan.

Agenda Item No. 3
File Code No. 570.04
Council Agenda Report
Increase in Construction Change Order Authority for the Central Library Renovation Project [Resolution; Agreement]
May 7, 2024

Page 2 ends

At this time, the project is estimated to be 85% complete.

Additional Authorizations
An additional change order authorization and professional service agreement amendments are required to compensate the contractor and consultants for additional work from unforeseen conditions including: hand digging around existing utilities and infrastructure, repairing and replacing storm-related damage, and an adjustment to the hardscape in the plaza to allow for an increase in Library programming space.

BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

The following summarizes all Project design costs, construction contract funding, and other Project costs:

CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES

FUNDING SUMMARY
Current
Contract
Proposed
Increase Total
Construction Management Services
TynanGroup, LP (Third Amendment) $268,625 $99,160 $367,785 Construction Inspection Services
Pacific Materials Laboratory of Santa
Barbara, Inc. (First Amendment)
$19,980 $32,305 $52,285
Total Additional Costs $288,605 $131,465 $420,070

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT

FUNDING SUMMARY
Base
Contract
Change
Order Total
Existing Contract Authority
(Nationwide Contracting Services, Inc.) $9,387,750 $1,188,775 $10,576,525 Proposed Increase $0 $850,000 $850,000
Total Construction Costs $9,387,750 $2,038,775 $11,426,525 Staff recommends the transfer of existing Measure C funds appropriated for other Library projects to cover the additional costs of the Project. The transfers include $571,000 from the Eastside Library Garage Project, $160,000 from the Existing Library Elevator Upgrade Project, and $90,000 from the Library Faulkner Gallery Kitchen Project. Each of these projects remain a priority for the Library, and funds will be requested as part of the next Council Agenda Report
Increase in Construction Change Order Authority for the Central Library Renovation Project [Resolution; Agreement]
May 7, 2024

Page 3 ends

two-year budget process. It is anticipated there will be sufficient appropriations to complete the Project with the recommended transfer of existing Measure C funds and available grant funding for the new ADA Elevator.

PREPARED BY: Brian D’Amour, P.E., City Engineer/CS/JW/sk SUBMITTED BY: Clifford M. Maurer, P.E., Public Works Director APPROVED BY: City Administrator’s Office
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA BARBARA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 23-076,
ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024, TO

APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR THE CENTRAL LIBRARY

RENOVATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, in accordance with the City Charter, the City Administrator filed with the Council a proposed budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023; WHEREAS, the City Council is required to adopt a budget before the beginning of the fiscal year on July 1, 2023;
WHEREAS, the City Charter provides that at any public meeting after the adoption of the budget, the City Council may amend or supplement the budget by motion adopted by the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the total members of the City Council; and WHEREAS, as authorized by Resolution No. 23-076, this Resolution approves the amendment to the budget as provided herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA THAT In accordance with the provisions of Section 1205 of the City Charter, the budget for the Fiscal Year 2024, as adopted by Resolution No. 23-076, is hereby amended as follows:

The Council approves the allocation of available expenditure appropriations in the Measure C Capital Fund in the Eastside Library Garage Project in the amount of $571,000, Existing Library Elevator Upgrade Project in the amount of $160,000, and Library Faulkner Gallery Kitchen Project in the amount of $90,000 to the Central Library Renovation Project in the amount of $821,000 for the Nationwide General Contracting Services Inc. contract and additional construction support services for the Central Library Renovation Project.

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: May 7, 2024
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Fire Prevention Division, Fire Department
SUBJECT: Set a Date for Public Hearing Regarding Renewal of Levy for Fiscal Year 2025 for the Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment District [Resolution]
RECOMMENDATION:

That Council adopt, by reading of title only, A Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Declaring its Intention to Continue the Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment within the Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones; Declaring the Work to be of More Than General or Ordinary Benefit and Describing the District to be Assessed to Pay the Costs and Expenses Thereof; Preliminarily Approving the Updated Engineer’s Report; Stating Intention to Continue Assessments for Fiscal Year 2025 and Establishing a Time of 2:00 P.M. on Tuesday May 21, 2024, in the City Council Chambers for a Public Hearing on the Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment.

DISCUSSION:

On July 11, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution 06-064 which declared the Council’s intention to order expansion of vegetation road clearance, implementation of a defensible space inspection and assistance program, and implementation of a vegetation management program within the Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones of the High Fire Hazard Area. The Resolution described the special benefit to be assessed and approved an Engineer’s Report, confirmed the diagram and assessment, and ordered levy of the Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment District (District) for Fiscal Year 2007. As required by the Resolution, the assessment must be renewed annually by Council. The City has renewed the Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment for the past fifteen years.

Assessment funds continue to reduce the risk and severity of wildland fires through the reduction of flammable vegetation. The assessment provides three primary services:

1. Vegetation Road Clearance: Each year the assessment provides approximately 14 miles of road clearance. The frequency is such that most roads in the District are cleared of impeding vegetation every three years. Clearing vegetation from the roadways is required of property owners by law and allows for safer egress of Agenda Item No. 4
File Code No. 290.00
Council Agenda Report
Set A Date For Public Hearing Regarding Renewal Of Levy For Fiscal Year 2025 For The Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment District [Resolution] May 7, 2024

Page 2 ends

residents and ingress of first responders during an emergency. In Fiscal Year 2024 we have cleared 14 Miles of roadways, representing 110 tons of vegetation.

2. Defensible Space Inspection and Assistance: This element of the assessment provides assistance to property owners in creating defensible space around their homes. Defensible space is a key element in preventing the ignition of homes during a wildfire by reducing the exposure of the home to burning vegetation. Defensible space assistance will again involve scores of site visits to assist homeowners. In addition, the assessment provides chipping services to residents of the District after the vegetation has been cut. Chipping provides a cost effective way for homeowners to dispose of cut material. The chipped vegetation may be reused as a ground cover in landscaping. Over 200 tons of vegetation has been chipped and removed in FY2024.

3. Vegetation Management: Vegetation management is the selective removal of flammable vegetation in open land outside of property owner’s defensible space.

The goal is to lessen the severity of a fire, in the event that one occurs, by depriving the fire of a large amount of fuel. This is accomplished by preferentially removing exotic plants, thinning, pruning and limbing vegetation to remove fire ladders, limbing up the canopy and pruning out dead material. Vegetation management retains the overall look of wildland areas and minimizes impacts to natural resources while reducing the amount of flammable vegetation. Vegetation management was successfully completed on 20 acres in Fiscal Year 2024. These projects require staff to strengthen the public-private relationship by working with multiple, individual property owners and contract crews to link individual parcels across larger areas of adjacent land. Working in cooperation with multiple property owners, there is a greater impact on reducing the community threat from wildfire.

In addition to vegetation removal, this project also accomplished education, protection of natural resources unique to the area and outlined individual maintenance programs. The project areas are identified in the Community Wildland Protection Plan (CWPP).

ANNUAL LEVY:

The Wildland Fire Assessment may be annually increased by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) in an amount not to exceed 4% per year. In adjusting for the CPI, the allowable increase is calculated using the CPI from the past year plus any deferred increases from previous years.

For Fiscal Year 2025, staff and the Assessment Engineer propose a CPI increase of 4.0%.

The actual CPI for 2023-24 was 4.926% and the total allowable CPI adjustment for 2023- 24 was 4.00%, and the rates were adjusted accordingly. The CPI for 2024-25 is 3.47% and with the carryover of .53% from 2023-2024 it will bring the total CPI increase to 4% for FY2025.

Council Agenda Report
Set A Date For Public Hearing Regarding Renewal Of Levy For Fiscal Year 2025 For The Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment District [Resolution] May 7, 2024

Page 3 ends

The rate for Fiscal Year 2025 as suggested in the Engineer’s Report (see Attachment) will therefore be set at $99.70 per single family home located within the boundary of the Foothill Zone and $123.63 per single family home located within the Extreme Foothill Zone boundary. Total anticipated revenues to be generated from the assessment are $332,754 for Fiscal Year 2025. For comparison, the Fiscal Year 2024 rates were $95.86 and $118.87 respectively, totaling $319,898. The increased revenue anticipated for Fiscal Year 2025 will allow us to continue to provide the same level of service in all three areas.

As required in Resolution 06-064, an updated Engineer’s Report has been prepared and includes the proposed budget and assessment rate. The updated Engineer’s Report must be considered by Council at a noticed public hearing and serves as the basis for the continuation of the assessments.

The updated Engineer’s Report is available for public review by contacting [email protected] or [email protected].

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Vegetation removed through vegetation road clearance and the defensible space chipping assistance program is chipped and spread back on to the ground or in areas of local parks where feasible. The goal is to reuse at least 80% of all chipped material locally avoiding the cost of disposal fees, extra vehicle trips and landfill use. Non-native pest plants are not chipped, but rather hauled off-site to be disposed of properly. In FY2024, we exceeded that goal achieving 100% reuse.

ATTACHMENT: Preliminary Engineer’s Report
PREPARED BY: Ryan DiGuilio, Fire Marshal
SUBMITTED BY: Chris Mailes, Fire Chief
APPROVED BY: City Administrator’s Office
FY 2024-25
City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
PRELIMINARY ENGINEER’S REPORT
May 2024
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 50078
et seq., and Article XIIID of the California Constitution

ATTACHMENT
City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25
Page i
(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)
City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25
Page ii
City of Santa Barbara
City Council
Randy Rowse, Mayor
Eric Friedman, Councilmember
Oscar Gutierrez, Councilmember
Alejandra Gutierrez, Councilmember
Meagan Harmon, Councilmember
Mike Jordan, Councilmember
Kristen Sneddon, Councilmember
Fire Prevention Bureau
Chris Mailes, Fire Chief
Ryan DiGuilio, Fire Marshal
Chris Braden, Fire Services Specialist
City Attorney’s Office
Sarah Knecht, Interim City Administrator
Tava Ostrenger, Interim City Attorney
Engineer of Work
SCI Consulting Group
City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25
Page iii
Table of Contents
0BIntroduction........................................................................................................... 1 Proposition 218 .........................................................................................................................6 Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association v Santa Clara County Open Space Authority ..................6 Dahms v. Downtown Pomona Property....................................................................................7 Bonander v. Town of Tiburon....................................................................................................7 Beutz v. County of Riverside......................................................................................................7 Golden Hill Neighborhood Association v. City of San Diego .....................................................7 Compliance with Current Law ...................................................................................................8 1BDescription of Services ........................................................................................... 9 2BCost and Budget................................................................................................... 11 2BMethod of Apportionment ................................................................................... 12 Method of Apportionment......................................................................................................12 Discussion of Benefit...............................................................................................................12 Benefit Factors ........................................................................................................................13 Benefit Finding ........................................................................................................................15 General Versus Special Benefit................................................................................................15 Calculating General Benefit.....................................................................................................18 Zones of Benefit ......................................................................................................................20 Assessment Apportionment....................................................................................................22 Method of Assessment............................................................................................................23 Criteria and Policies.................................................................................................................27 4BAssessment.......................................................................................................... 29 5BAssessment Diagram ............................................................................................ 31 5BAppendices .......................................................................................................... 33 Appendix A – Assessment Roll, FY 2024-25.............................................................................33 Appendix B – California Government Code Section 50078 et. seq.........................................34 Appendix C – Article XIIID of the California Constitution........................................................37 End Notes................................................................................................................. 41 City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25
Page iv
List of Figures
Figure 1 – Wildland Fire History in Santa Barbara County............................................................... 1 Figure 2 - Cost and Budget FY 2024-25.......................................................................................... 11 Figure 3 - Relative Hazard/Risk Scoring for High Fire Hazard Area Zones..................................... 21 Figure 4 - Scoring System............................................................................................................... 21 Figure 5 - Wildland Fire Risk Factors.............................................................................................. 22 Figure 6 – Structure Value Factors................................................................................................. 24 Figure 7 - Relative Benefit Factors for Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones................................. 26 City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 1 ends

0B Introduction
The City of Santa Barbara is located about 100 miles northwest of Los Angeles, largely on the slopes between the Pacific Ocean and the Santa Ynez Mountains. The City of Santa Barbara provides fire services throughout the City limits. Fire services include fire suppression, protection, prevention, evacuation planning, and education.

Due to topography, location, climate and infrastructure, the Santa Barbara community has a relatively high inherent risk of wildland fires. Listed below are some of the major wildland fires that have occurred in Santa Barbara County since 1970:

Figure 1 – Wildland Fire History in Santa Barbara County Year Fire Name Acres Homes Lost
1971 Romero Canyon Fire 14,538 4
1977 Sycamore Canyon Fire 805 234
1977 Hondo Canyon Fire 10,000 0
1979 Eagle Canyon Fire 4,530 5
1990 Painted Cave Fire 4,900 524
1993 Marre Fire 43,864 0
2002 Sudden Fire 7,160 0
2004 Gaviota Fire 7,440 1
2007 Zaca Fire 240,207 0
2008 Gap Fire 9,443 0
2008 Tea Fire 1.940 210
2009 Jesusita Fire 8,733 80
City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 2 ends

2016 Sherpa Fire 7,474 0
2016 Rey Fire 32,606 0
2016 Canyon Fire 12,518 0
2017 Thomas Fire 281,893 1,063
2019 Holiday Fire 113 24
2019 Cave Fire 3,126 0
2021 Loma Fire 7 0
2021 Alisal Fire 16,970 12
In response to the considerable wildland fire risk in the area, the City of Santa Barbara Fire Department prepared a Wildland Fire Plan in January, 2004, in which it identified four High Fire Hazard Zones: The Coastal Zone, the Coastal Interior Zone, the Foothill Zone, and the Extreme Foothill Zone. The two Zones with the highest wildland fire risk are the Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones (the “Zones”), and these are the Zones that are included in this assessment.

These Zones are at a high risk of wildland fires due to the following factors:
▪ Climate. The climate consists of cool, moist winters and hot, dry summers. The low humidity and high summer temperatures increase the likelihood that a spark will ignite a fire in the area, and that the fire will spread rapidly. ▪ Topography. Periodic wind conditions known as “Sundowner” and “Santa Ana” winds interact with the steep slopes in the Santa Ynez Mountains and the ocean influence, resulting in an increase in the speed of the wind to severe levels. These two types of wind conditions increase the likelihood that fires will advance downslope towards the Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones. In addition, these winds can greatly increase the rate at which a fire will spread.
▪ Chaparral. Much of the undeveloped landscape is covered with chaparral. Chaparral sheds woody, dead, and organic materials rich in flammable oils, which accumulate over time. Areas covered with chaparral typically experience wildland fires which burn the accumulated plant materials, and renew the chaparral for its next cycle of growth.

Therefore, areas of chaparral which are not thinned, and from which the dead plant City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 3 ends

materials are not removed or burned off in prescribed fires, provide ample opportunities for wildland fires to occur and to spread. ▪ Road Systems. Many of the roads in the Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones do not meet current Fire Department access and vegetation road clearance standards, and many are made even more narrow due to the encroachment of vegetation. A number of the bridges have weight requirements that are below Fire Department weight standards. In addition, many driveways are long and steep, posing a safety hazard. All of these factors make it more difficult and more hazardous for the Fire Department to provide fire suppression services in these areas.
▪ Water Supply. In the Extreme Foothill Zone, the City water supply is limited in some areas, and not available in others. These factors increase the risks associated with fires, due to the reduced availability of water to fight any fires that occur. ▪ Fire Response Time. Much of the Extreme Foothill Zone, and some of the Foothill Zone, is outside the City’s 4 minute Fire Department response time. As a result, fires in these areas may have more time to spread and to increase in severity before fire suppression equipment can reach them.
▪ Proximity to the Los Padres National Forest. The Los Padres National Forest (LPNF) is a large forest to the north of the Foothill and Extreme Foothill zones. The LPNF provides a great deal of potential fuel for any wildland fire in the area. Wildland fires that start in the LPNF have the potential to move south toward the Foothill and Extreme Foothill zones.

This Engineer’s Report (the "Report") was prepared to: 1) contain the information required by Government Code Section 50078.4, including a) a description of each lot or parcel of property to be subject to the assessment, b) the amount of the assessment for each lot or parcel for the initial fiscal year, c) the maximum amount of the assessment which may be levied for each lot or parcel during any fiscal year, d) the duration of the assessment, e) the basis of the assessment, f) the schedule of the assessment, and g) a description specifying the requirements for protest and hearing procedures for the assessment pursuant to Section 50078.6; 2) establish a budget to provide services to reduce the severity and damage from wildland fires (the "Services") that will be funded by the 2024-25 assessments; 3) determine the benefits received from the Services by property within the City of Santa Barbara Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment District (the "Assessment District") and; 4) assign a method of assessment apportionment to lots and parcels within the Assessment District. This Report and the assessments have been made pursuant to the California Government Code Section 50078 et. seq. (the "Code") and Article XIIID of the California Constitution (the “Article”).

In Fiscal Year 2006-07, the City of Santa Barbara City Council (the “Council”) by Resolution called for an assessment ballot proceeding and public hearing on the then-proposed establishment of a wildland fire suppression assessment.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 4 ends

On May 5, 2006 a notice of assessment and assessment ballot was mailed to property owners within the proposed Assessment District boundaries. Such notice included a description of the Services to be funded by the proposed assessments, a proposed assessment amount for each parcel owned, and an explanation of the method of voting on the assessments. Each notice also included a postage prepaid ballot on which the property owner could mark his or her approval or disapproval of the proposed assessments as well as affix his or her signature.

After the ballots were mailed to property owners in the Assessment District, the required minimum 45 day time period was provided for the return of the assessment ballots. Following this 45 day time period, a public hearing was held on June 20, 2006 for the purpose of allowing public testimony regarding the proposed assessments. At the public hearing, the public had the opportunity to speak on the issue. After the conclusion of the public input portion of the hearing, the hearing was continued to July 11, 2006 to allow time for the tabulation of ballots.

With the passage of Proposition 218 on November 6, 1996, The Right to Vote on Taxes Act, now Article XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution, the proposed assessments could be levied for fiscal year 2006-07, and continued in future years, only if the ballots submitted in favor of the assessments were greater than the ballots submitted in opposition to the assessments. (Each ballot is weighted by the amount of proposed assessment for the property that it represents).

After the conclusion of the public input portion of the Public Hearing held on June 20, 2006, all valid received ballots were tabulated by the City of Santa Barbara Clerk. At the continued public hearing on July 11, 2006, after the ballots were tabulated, it was determined that the assessment ballots submitted in opposition to the proposed assessments did not exceed the assessment ballots submitted in favor of the assessments (weighted by the proportional financial obligation of the property for which ballots are submitted).

As a result, the Council gained the authority to approve the levy of the assessments for fiscal year 2006-07 and to continue to levy them in future years. The Council took action, by a Resolution passed on July 31, 2006, to approve the first year levy of the assessments for fiscal year 2006-07.

The authority granted by the ballot proceeding was for a maximum assessment rate of $65.00 per single family home, increased each subsequent year by the Los Angeles Area Consumer Price Index (CPI) not to exceed 4% per year. In the event that the annual change in the CPI exceeds 4%, any percentage change in excess of 4% can be cumulatively reserved and can be added to the annual change in the CPI for years in which the CPI change is less than 4%.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 5 ends

In each subsequent year for which the assessments will be continued, the Council must preliminarily approve at a public meeting a budget for the upcoming fiscal year’s costs and services, an updated annual Engineer’s Report, and an updated assessment roll listing all parcels and their proposed assessments for the upcoming fiscal year. A new Engineer’s Report is prepared each year in order to establish the CPI adjustment for that year; the new maximum authorized assessment rate for that year; the budget for that year; and the amount to be charged to each parcel in the District that year, subject to that year’s assessment rate and any changes in the attributes of the properties in the District, including but not limited to use changes, parcel subdivisions, and/or parcel consolidations. At this meeting, the Council will also call for the publication in a local newspaper of a legal notice of the intent to continue the assessments for the next fiscal year and set the date for the noticed public hearing. At the annual public hearing, members of the public can provide input to the Council prior to the Council’s decision on continuing the services and assessments for the next fiscal year.

If the assessments are so confirmed and approved, the levies will be submitted to the Santa Barbara County Auditor/Controller for inclusion on the property tax roll for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

The levy and collection of the assessments will continue year-to-year until terminated by the City Council.

If the City Council approves this Engineer's Report for fiscal year 2024-25 and the assessments by Resolution, a notice of assessment levies must be published in a local paper at least 10 days prior to the date of the public hearing. Following the minimum 10-day time period after publishing the notice, a public hearing will be held for the purpose of allowing public testimony about the proposed continuation of the assessments for fiscal year 2024-25.

A Public Hearing is scheduled for May 21, 2024. At this hearing, the Council will consider approval of a resolution confirming the assessments for fiscal year 2024-25. If so confirmed and approved, the assessments will be submitted to the Santa Barbara County Auditor/Controller for inclusion on the property tax rolls for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

The Assessment District is narrowly drawn to include only properties that benefit from the additional fire protection services that are provided by the assessment funds. The Assessment Diagram included in this report shows the boundaries of the Assessment District.

In 2008 per California Public Resource Code 4201-4204 and Government Code 51175 -89, the Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM) completed an analysis to identify Local Responsibility Area areas of Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ) within the City of Santa Barbara.

Discussions between OSFM and the City of Santa Barbara Fire Department were concluded in 2010. As a result, additional parcels have been added to the 2004 City of Santa Barbara high fire hazard area, Foothill Zone. These additional parcels are not included in the Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment District at this time, and Services provided to these parcels are not funded from this assessment.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 6 ends

Proposition 218
This assessment was formed consistent with Proposition 218, The Right to Vote on Taxes Act, which was approved by the voters of California on November 6, 1996, and is now Article XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution. Proposition 218 provides for benefit assessments to be levied to fund the cost of providing services, improvements, as well as maintenance and operation expenses to a public improvement which benefits the assessed property.

Proposition 218 describes a number of important requirements, including a property-owner balloting, for the formation and continuation of assessments, and these requirements were satisfied by the process used to establish this assessment.

Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association v Santa Clara County Open Space Authority
In July of 2008, the California Supreme Court issued its ruling on the Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association, Inc. v. Santa Clara County Open Space Authority (“SVTA vs. SCCOSA”) case. This ruling is the most significant legal decision clarifying Proposition 218. Several of the most important elements of the ruling included further emphasis that:
▪ Benefit assessments are for special, not general benefit ▪ The services and/or improvements funded by assessments must be clearly defined ▪ Special benefits are directly received by and provide a direct advantage to property in the Assessment District
This Engineer’s Report is consistent with the SVTA vs. SCCOSA decision and with the requirements of Article XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution because the Services to be funded are clearly defined; the Services are available to all benefiting property in the Assessment District, the benefiting property in the Assessment District will directly and tangibly benefit from improved protection from fire damage, increased safety of property and other special benefits and such special benefits provide a direct advantage to property in the Assessment District that is not enjoyed by the public at large or other property. There have been a number of clarifications made to the analysis, findings and supporting text in this Report to ensure that this consistency is well communicated.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 7 ends

Dahms v. Downtown Pomona Property
On June 8, 2009, the Court of Appeal for the Second District of California amended its original opinion upholding a benefit assessment district for property in the downtown area of the City of Pomona. On July 22, 2009, the California Supreme Court denied review and the court's decision in Dahms became binding precedent for assessments. In Dahms, the court upheld an assessment that conferred a 100% special benefit to the assessed parcels on the rationale that the services and improvements funded by the assessments were provided directly and only to property in the assessment district over and above those services or improvements provided by the city generally.

Bonander v. Town of Tiburon
On December 31, 2009, the 1st District Court of Appeal overturned a benefit assessment approved by property owners to pay for placing overhead utility lines underground in an area of the Town of Tiburon. The Court invalidated the assessments on the ground that the assessments had been apportioned to assessed property based, in part, on relative costs within sub-areas of the assessment district instead of proportional special benefits.

Beutz v. County of Riverside
On May 26, 2010 the 4th District Court of Appeals issued a decision on the Steven Beutz v. County of Riverside (“Beutz”) appeal. This decision overturned an assessment for park maintenance in Wildomar, California, primarily because the general benefits associated with improvements and services were not explicitly calculated, quantified and separated from the special benefits.

Golden Hill Neighborhood Association v. City of San Diego On September 22, 2011, the San Diego Court of Appeal issued a decision on the Golden Hill Neighborhood Association v. City of San Diego appeal. This decision overturned an assessment for street and landscaping maintenance in the Greater Golden Hill neighborhood of San Diego, California. The court described two primary reasons for its decision. First, like in Beutz, the court found the general benefits associated with services were not explicitly calculated, quantified and separated from the special benefits. Second, the court found that the City had failed to record the basis for the assessment on its own parcels.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 8 ends

Compliance with Current Law
This Engineer’s Report is consistent with the requirements of Article XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution and with the SVTA decision because the Services to be funded are clearly defined; the Services are available to and will be directly provided to all benefiting property in the Assessment District; and the Services provide a direct advantage to property in the Assessment District that would not be received in absence of the Assessments.

This Engineer’s Report is consistent with Dahms because, similar to the Downtown Pomona assessment validated in Dahms, the Services will be directly provided to property in the Assessment District. Moreover, while Dahms could be used as the basis for a finding of 0% general benefits, this Engineer’s Report establishes a more conservative measure of general benefits.

The Engineer’s Report is consistent with Bonander because the Assessments have been apportioned based on the overall cost of the Services and proportional special benefit to each property. Finally, the Assessments are consistent with Buetz because the general benefits have been explicitly calculated and quantified and excluded from the Assessments.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 9 ends

1BDescription of Services
The City of Santa Barbara Fire Department provides a range of fire protection, prevention, and educational services to the City and its residents.

The following is a description of the wildland fire suppression Services that are provided for the benefit of property within the Assessment District. Prior to the passage of the assessment in 2006, the baseline level of service was below the standard described in the City’s 2004 Wildland Fire Plan. Due to inadequate funding, the level of service continued to diminish and would have diminished further had this assessment not been instituted. With the passage of this assessment, the services were enhanced significantly. The formula below describes the relationship between the final level of improvements, the baseline level of service (pre 2006) had the assessment not been instituted, and the enhanced level of improvements funded by the assessment.

Note: Baseline level of service is pre-2006.

The services (the “Services”) undertaken by the City of Santa Barbara Fire Department and the cost thereof paid from the levy of the annual assessment provide special benefit to Assessor Parcels within the Assessment District as defined in the Method of Assessment herein. In addition to the definitions provided by the California Government Code Section 50078 et. seq., (the “Code”) the Services are generally described as follows:
▪ Expansion of the vegetation road clearance program to cover all public roads within the Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones. This program reduces fuel, enhance evacuation routes, and decrease fire response times
▪ Implementation of a defensible space and fire prevention inspection and chipping assistance program for all properties in the Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones ▪ Implementation of a vegetation management program in the Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones
As applied herein, “vegetation road clearance” means the treatment, clearing, reducing, or changing of vegetation near roadways in the Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones where vegetation poses a fire hazard and does not meet Fire Department Vegetation Road Clearance Standards within the high fire hazard area (As provided in Santa Barbara Municipal Code Section

8.04).

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 10 ends

“Defensible space” is a perimeter created around a structure where vegetation is treated, cleared or reduced to slow the spread of wildfire towards a structure, reduce the chance of a structure fire burning to the surrounding area, and provides a safe perimeter for firefighters to protect a structure (As provided in Chapter 49 of the California Fire Code, as adopted by the City of Santa Barbara pursuant to Santa Barbara Municipal Code Section 8.04). “Vegetation management” means the reduction of fire hazard through public education, vegetation hazard reduction, and other methods as needed to manage vegetation in areas with unique hazards such as heavy, flammable vegetation, lack of access due to topography and roads, and/or firefighter safety.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 11 ends

2B Cost and Budget
Figure 2 - Cost and Budget FY 2024-25
Notes:

1. Evacuation Planning - Evacuation Roadway Clearing: Staffing costs include City Fire Department staff. Materials Costs includes traffic signage, notification letters, and door hangers to inform homeowners of start dates. Project costs include the utilization of contractors, equipment and manpower required to complete Roadway Clearance.

2. Defensible Space: Staffing costs include City Fire Department staff and inputting Defensible Space Evaluation reports into Accela.

Materials Costs for Annual Chipping includes traffic signage, notification letters, door hangers and sandwich boards to inform homeowners of start dates. Chipping program includes direct costs to coordinate, communicate and provide equipment and manpower in support of chipping program. This includes the cost of contracting a chipper and truck to dispose of chipped material.

3. Vegetation Management: Staffing costs include City Fire Department staff including the coordination, communication and cooperation of homeowners involved in projects. Project costs include contractor, roll-off dumpster, porta-potty, on-site signage and notification to homeowners on starting dates.

Total
Budget
Services Costs
Evacuation Planning - Evacuation Roadway Clearing1
Staffing $64,000
Materials $5,500
Project Costs $57,000
Defensible Space2
Staffing $48,000
Materials $7,500
Chipping Program $94,616
Vegetation Management3
Staffing $62,000
Project Costs $10,973
Totals for Installation, Maintenance and Servicing $349,589 Less: District Contribution for General Benefits ($26,919) Net Cost of Installation, Maintenance and Servicing to Assessment District $322,670 Incidental Costs:

District Administration and Project Management $6,485
Allowance for County Collection $3,599
Subtotals - Incidentals $10,084
Total Wildland Fire Suppression District Budget $332,754 (Net Amount to be Assessed)
Assessment District Budget Allocation to Parcels
Total Assessment Budget $332,754
Single Family Equivalent Benefit Units in District 3,338 Assessment per Single Family Equivalent Unit (SFE) $99.70

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Estimate of Costs
City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 12 ends

2BMethod of Apportionment
Method of Apportionment
This section includes an explanation of the special benefits derived from the Services, the criteria for the expenditure of assessment funds and the methodology used to apportion the total assessments to properties within the Assessment District.

The Assessment District area consists of all Assessor Parcels within the Foothill and Extreme Foothill zones of the High Fire Hazard Area as defined by the 2004 Wildland Fire Plan. The method used for apportioning the assessment is based upon the proportional special benefits from the Services derived by the properties in the assessment area over and above general benefits conferred on real property or to the public at large. Special benefit is calculated for each parcel in the Assessment District using the following process:

1. Identification of all benefit factors derived from the Improvements

2. Calculation of the proportion of these benefits that are general

3. Determination of the relative special benefit within different areas within the Assessment District

4. Determination of the relative special benefit per property type

5. Calculation of the specific assessment for each individual parcel based upon special vs. general benefit; location, property type, property characteristics, improvements on property and other supporting attributes
Discussion of Benefit
California Government Code Section 50078 et. seq. allows agencies which provide fire suppression services, such as the City of Santa Barbara Fire Department, to levy assessments for fire suppression services. Section 50078 states the following:
“Any local agency which provides fire suppression services directly or by contract with the state or a local agency may, by ordinance or by resolution adopted after notice and hearing, determine and levy an assessment for fire suppression services pursuant to this article.”
In addition, California Government Code Section 50078.1 defines the term “fire suppression” as follows:
“(c) "Fire suppression" includes firefighting and fire prevention, including, but not limited to, vegetation removal or management undertaken, in whole or in part, for the reduction of a fire hazard.”
City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 13 ends

Therefore, the Services provided by the Assessment District fall within the scope of services that may be funded by assessments under the Code.

The assessments can only be levied based on the special benefit to property. This benefit is received by property over and above any general benefits. Moreover, such benefit is not based on any one property owner’s specific use of the Services or a property owner’s specific demographic status. With reference to the requirements for assessments, Section 50078.5 of the California Government Code states:
"(b)The benefit assessment shall be levied on a parcel, class of improvement to property, or use of property basis, or a combination thereof, within the boundaries of the local agency, zone, or area of benefit.”
“The assessment may be levied against any parcel, improvement, or use of property to which such services may be made available whether or not the service is actually used." Proposition 218, as codified in Article XIIID of the California Constitution, has confirmed that assessments must be based on the special benefit to property:
"No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel." Since assessments are levied on the basis of special benefit, they are not a tax and are not governed by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution.

The following section describes how and why the Services specially benefit properties. This benefit is particular and distinct from its effect on property in general or the public at large.

Benefit Factors
In order to allocate the assessments, the Engineer identified the types of special benefit arising from the Services that are provided to property in the Assessment District. These benefit factors confer a direct advantage to the assessed properties; otherwise they would be general benefit.

The following benefit categories have been established that represent the types of special benefit conferred to residential, commercial, industrial, institutional and other lots and parcels resulting from the services to reduce the severity and damage from wildland fires that are provided in the Assessment District. These categories of special benefit are derived from the statutes passed by the California Legislature and other studies, which describe the types of special benefit received by property from the Services of the Assessment District. These types of special benefit are summarized as follows:

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 14 ends

Increased safety and protection of real property assets for all property owners within the Assessment District.

As summarized previously, properties in the Assessment District are currently at higher risk for wildland fires. Uncontrolled fires would have a devastating impact on all properties within the Assessment District. The assessments fund an increase in services to mitigate the wildland fire threat, and thereby can significantly reduce the risk of property damage associated with fires.

Clearly, fire mitigation helps to protect and specifically benefits both improved properties and vacant properties in the Assessment District.
"Fire is the largest single cause of property loss in the United States. In the last decade, fires have caused direct losses of more than $120 billion and countless billions more in related cost."D
1 “Over 140,000 wildfires occurred on average each year, burning a total of almost 14.5 million acres. And since 1990, over 900 homes have been destroyed each year by wildfires.”D
2 “A wildfire sees your home as just another fuel source. The survivable space you construct around your home will keep all but the most ferocious wildfires at bay.” D 3 “A reasonably disaster-resistant America will not be achieved until there is greater acknowledgment of the importance of the fire service and a willingness at all levels of government to adequately fund the needs and responsibilities of the fire service.” D 4 “The strategies and techniques to address fire risks in structures are known. When implemented, these means have proven effective in the reduction of losses.” D 5 “Statistical data on insurance losses bears out the relationship between excellent fire protection…and low fire losses.” D
6 Protection of views, scenery and other resource values, for property in the Assessment District
The Assessment District provides funding for the mitigation of the wildland fire threat to protect public and private resources in the Assessment District. This benefits even those properties that are not directly damaged by fire by maintaining and improving the aesthetics and attractiveness of public and private resources in the community, as well as ensuring that such resources remain safe and well maintained.
“Intensely burned forests are rarely considered scenic.” D 7 “Smoke affects people…for example; in producing haze that degrades the visual quality of a sunny day…The other visual quality effect is that of the fire on the landscape. To many people, burned landscapes are not attractive and detract from the aesthetic values of an area.”D
8 “A visually preferred landscape can be the natural outcome of fuels treatments.” D 9 City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 15 ends

Enhanced utility and desirability of the properties in the Assessment District.

The assessments fund Services to reduce the severity and damage from wildland fires in the Assessment District. Such Services enhance the overall utility and desirability of the properties in the Assessment District.
“Residential satisfaction surveys have found that having nature near one’s home is extremely important in where people choose to live…This is especially true at the wildlandurban interface where some of the most serious fuels management must occur.” D 10 “People are coming to the [Bitterroot] valley in part because of its natural beauty which contributes to the quality of life that so many newcomers are seeking.” D 11 Benefit Finding
In summary, real property located within the boundaries of the Assessment District distinctly and directly benefits from increased safety and protection of real property, increased protection of scenery and views, and enhanced utility of properties in the Assessment District. These are special benefits to property in much the same way that sewer and water facilities, sidewalks and paved streets enhance the utility and desirability of property and make them more functional to use, safer and easier to access.

General Versus Special Benefit
Article XIIIC of the California Constitution requires any local agency proposing to increase or impose a benefit assessment to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.” The rationale for separating special and general benefits is to ensure that property owners subject to the benefit assessment are not paying for general benefits. The assessment can fund special benefits but cannot fund general benefits. Accordingly, a separate estimate of the special and general benefit is given in this section.

In other words:

Total
Benefit = General Benefit + Special Benefit
City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 16 ends

There is no widely-accepted or statutory formula for general benefit. General benefits are benefits from improvements or services that are not special in nature, are not “particular and distinct” and are not “over and above” benefits received by other properties. SVTA vs.

SCCOSA provides some clarification by indicating that general benefits provide “an indirect, derivative advantage” and are not necessarily proximate to the improvements.

The starting point for evaluating general and special benefits is the pre 2006 baseline level of service, had the assessment not been approved by the community. The assessment will fund Services “over and above” this general, baseline level and the special benefits estimated in this section are over and above the baseline.

A formula to estimate the general benefit is listed below:

Special benefit, on the other hand, is defined in the state constitution as “a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large.” The SVTA v. SCCOSA decision indicates that a special benefit is conferred to a property if it “receives a direct advantage from the improvement (e.g., proximity to a park).” In this assessment, as noted, the improved Services are available when needed to all properties in the Assessment District, so the overwhelming proportion of the benefits conferred to property is special, and are only minimally received by property outside the Assessment District or the public at large.

Proposition 218 twice uses the phrase “over and above” general benefits in describing special benefit. (Art. XIIID, sections 2(i) & 4(f).) Arguably, all of the Services being funded by the assessment would be a special benefit because the Services particularly and distinctly benefit the properties in the Assessment District over and above the baseline benefits.

Nevertheless, arguably some of the Services benefit the public at large and properties outside the Assessment District. In this report, the general benefit is conservatively estimated and described, and then budgeted so that it is funded by sources other than the assessment.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 17 ends

(In the 2009 Dahms case, the court upheld an assessment that conferred a 100% special benefit to the assessed parcels on the rationale that the services and improvements funded by the assessments were provided directly and only to property in the assessment district over and above those services or improvements provided by the city generally. Similarly, the Assessments described in this Engineer’s Report fund wildland fire services directly and only to the assessed parcels located within the assessment area. Moreover, every property within the Assessment District will receive the Services. While the Dahms decision would permit an assessment based on 100% special benefit and zero or minimal general benefits, in this report, the general benefit is estimated and described and budgeted so that it is funded by sources other than the Assessment.) City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 18 ends

Calculating General Benefit
This section provides a measure of the general benefits from the assessments Benefit to Property Outside the Assessment District
Properties within the Assessment District receive almost all of the special benefits from the Services because the Services will be provided solely in the Assessment District boundaries.

Properties proximate to, but outside of, the boundaries of the Assessment District receive some benefit from the Services due to some degree of indirectly reduced fire risk to their property.

These parcels that are proximate to the boundaries of the Assessment District are estimated to receive less than 50% of the benefits relative to parcels within the Assessment District because they do not directly receive the improved fire protection resulting from the Services funded by the Assessments.

At the time the Assessment District was formed, there were approximately 550 of these “proximate” properties.

Although it can reasonably be argued that properties protected inside, but near the Assessment District boundaries are offset by similar fire protection provided outside, but near the Assessment District’s boundaries, we use the more conservative approach of finding that 6.7% of the Services may be of general benefit to property outside the Assessment District.

Benefit to Property Inside the District that is Indirect and Derivative The “indirect and derivative” benefit to property within the Assessment District is particularly difficult to calculate. A solid argument can be presented that all benefit within the Assessment District is special, because the Services are clearly “over and above” and “particular and distinct” when compared with the pre-2006 baseline level of Services, had the assessment district not passed.

Assumptions:
550 parcels outside the district but proximate to the District Boundaries 3,550 parcels in the Assessment District.
50% relative benefit compared to property within the Assessment District.

Calculation:

General Benefit to property outside the Assessment District = (550/(550+3,550))*0.5=6.7%
City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 19 ends

In determining the Assessment District boundaries, the District has been careful to limit it to an area of parcels that will directly receive the benefit of the improved Services. All parcels will directly benefit from the use of the improved Services throughout the Assessment District in order to achieve the desired level of wildland fire suppression and protection throughout the Assessment District. Fire protection and suppression will be provided as needed throughout the area.

The SVTA vs. SCCOSA decision indicates that the fact that a benefit is conferred throughout the Assessment District area does not make the benefit general rather than special, so long as the Assessment District is narrowly drawn and limited to the parcels directly receiving shared special benefits from the service. This concept is particularly applicable in situations involving a landowner-approved assessment-funded extension of a local government service to benefit lands previously not receiving that particular service. The Fire Department therefore concludes that, other than the small general benefit to properties outside the Assessment District (discussed above) and to the public at large (discussed below), all of the benefits of the Services to the parcels within the Assessment District are special benefits and it is not possible or appropriate to separate any general benefits from the benefits conferred on parcels in the Assessment District.

Benefit To The Public At Large
With the type and scope of Services provided to the Assessment District, it is very difficult to calculate and quantify the scope of the general benefit conferred on the public at large. Because the Services directly serve and benefit all of the property in the Assessment District, any general benefit conferred on the public at large would be small. Nevertheless, there may be some indirect general benefit to the public at large.

The public at large uses the public highways and other regional facilities when traveling in and through the Assessment District and they may benefit from the services without contributing to the assessment. Although the protection of this critical infrastructure is certainly a benefit to all the property within the Assessment District, it is arguably “indirect and derivative” and possibly benefits people rather than property. A fair and appropriate measure of the general benefit to the public at large therefore is the amount of highway, and regional facilities within the Assessment District relative to the overall land area. An analysis of maps of the Assessment District shows that less than 1.0% of the land area in the Assessment District is covered by highways and regional facilities. This 1.0% therefore is a fair and appropriate measure of the general benefit to the public at large within the Assessment District Summary of General Benefits
Using a sum of the measures of general benefit for the public at large and land outside the Assessment District, we find that approximately 7.7% of the benefits conferred by the Assessment District may be general in nature and should be funded by sources other than the assessment.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 20 ends

The Assessment District’s total budget for 2024-25 is $349,589. The Assessment District must obtain funding from sources other than the assessment in the amount of at least $26,919 ($349,589*7.7%) to pay for the cost of the general benefits. This is because the assessments levied by the Fire Department may not exceed the special benefits provided by the Services, and the Assessment Engineer concluded that a combined total of 7.7% of the cost of Services provide a general benefit to properties outside the Assessment District and a benefit to the public at large.

For Fiscal Year 2024-25, the City will contribute at least $26,919, or 7.7% of the total Assessment District budget, to the Assessment District from sources other than this assessment to cover the cost of the general benefits.

Zones of Benefit
Initially, the Fire Department evaluated the geographic area within and around the City limits (including the City of Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County, Montecito and National Forest lands) based upon three fire hazard risk variables: vegetation (fuel), topography and weather. This analysis was used to narrowly determine the boundaries of the “high fire hazard area.” Further, zones were narrowly drawn within the high fire hazard area and graded “extreme,” “high,” “moderate” or “low”. Next, the Fire Department evaluated the roof type, proximity of structures, road systems, water supply, fire response times and historic fire starts within the high fire hazard area and developed 4 specific zones:
▪ Extreme Foothill Zone
▪ Foothill Zone
▪ Coastal Zone
▪ Coastal Interior Zone
These zones were used to apply appropriate policies and actions based upon hazard and risk. The results of this analysis were tabulated and presented in Tables 2 through 4 in the 2004 Wildland Fire Plan.

General Benefit Calculation

6.7% (Outside the Assessment District)
+ 0.0% (Inside the district – indirect and derivative)
+ 1.0% (Public at Large)
= 7.7% (Total General Benefit)
City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 21 ends

Accordingly, “Zones of Benefit” corresponding to the fire risk zones are used to equitably assign special benefit, and are used for the basis of the “Fire Risk Factors” discussed below. Each zone was narrowly drawn, and has been given a score, based upon the evaluated risk criteria, as shown in Figure 3. (The assessment provides Services in the Extreme Foothill Zone and the Foothill Zone only.)
Figure 3 - Relative Hazard/Risk Scoring for High Fire Hazard Area Zones Hazard/Risk
Attribute
Extreme
Foothill
Zone
Foothill
Zone
Coastal
Zone
Coastal
Interior
Zone
Combined Hazard
Assessment -
vegetation (fuel),
topography,
weather*
40 30 20 10
Roof Type** 1 2 2 3
Proximity 1 3 1 3
Road 3 3 1 1
Water 3 1 1 1
Response 3 2 2 2
Ignitions 1 1 1 1
Total Score 52 42 28 21
* The Hazard Assessment element of this analysis is the most significant. Scores have been “weighted” by a factor of 10.
** In the Extreme Foothill Zone fire retardant roofing materials are more prevalent, resulting in lower risk in this area.

Figure 4 shows the numeric scoring system used to develop the relative total scores.

Figure 4 - Scoring System
Qualititative
Score
Numeric
Score
Very High 4
High 3
Moderate 2
Low 1
The total relative scores for each zone are tabulated and normalized, based up the Foothill Zone, and shown in Figure 5.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 22 ends

Figure 5 - Wildland Fire Risk Factors
Zone Raw Score Wildland Fire Risk Factor
Extreme Foothill Zone 52 1.24
Foothill Zone 42 1.00
Coastal Zone** 28 .67
Coastal Interior Zone** 21 .50
**Coastal Zone and Coastal Interior Zone are included in this analysis for clarity; however these zones are not included in the Assessment District.

Assessment Apportionment
In the process of determining the appropriate method of assessment, the Assessment Engineer considered various alternatives. For example, an assessment only for all residential improved property was considered but was determined to be inappropriate because vacant, commercial, industrial and other properties also receive special benefits from the assessments.

Moreover, a fixed or flat assessment for all properties of similar type was deemed to be inappropriate because larger commercial/industrial properties and residential properties with multiple dwelling units receive a higher degree of benefit than other similarly used properties that are significantly smaller. For two properties used for commercial purposes, there clearly is a higher benefit provided to the larger property in comparison to a smaller commercial property because the larger property generally supports a larger building and has higher numbers of employees, customers and guests that benefit from reduced wildland fire risk. This benefit ultimately flows to the property. Larger parcels, therefore, receive an increased benefit from the assessments.

The Assessment Engineer determined that the appropriate method of assessment should be based on the type of property, the relative size of the property and the potential use of property by residents and employees. This method is further described below.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 23 ends

Method of Assessment
The next step in apportioning assessments is to determine the relative special benefit for each property. This process involves determining the relative benefit received by each property in relation to a "benchmark" property, a single family detached dwelling on one parcel of one acre or less in the Foothill Zone (one “Single Family Equivalent Benefit Unit” or “SFE”). This SFE methodology is commonly used to distribute assessments in proportion to estimated special benefits and is generally recognized as providing the basis for a fair and appropriate distribution of assessments. In this Engineer’s Report, all properties are assigned an SFE value, which is each property’s relative benefit in relation to a single family home on one parcel.

The relative benefit to properties from fire related Services is:

Equation 1 – Relative Benefit to Properties
Benefit ≈ ∑ (Fire Risk Factors) ∗ ∑ (Structure Value Factors) That is, the benefit conferred to property is the “sum” the risk factors multiplied by the “sum” of the structure values factors.

Fire Risk Factors
Typical fire assessments (non-wildland) are evaluated based upon the fire risk of a certain property type. These evaluations consider factors such as use of structure (e.g. used for cooking), type of structure (centralized heating), etc.

Wildland fires, on the other hand, are initiated largely from external ignitions and are far less affected by structural, mechanical and electrical systems inherent to the building (except roof type). The principle Wildland fire risk factors are:
▪ Vegetation (fuel)
▪ Topography
▪ Weather
▪ Roof type
▪ Proximity of Structure
▪ Road Systems
▪ Water Supply
▪ Response
▪ Ignitions
City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 24 ends

These factors were fully evaluated in the 2004 Wildland Fire Plan and are manifested in the relative zone scores as shown in Figures 3, 4 and 5, above. Hence, the Fire Risk Factor for all properties within the Foothill Zone is 1.00 and the Fire Risk Factor for all properties in the Extreme Foothill Zone is 1.24.

Structure Value Factors
The relative value of different property types was evaluated within the high fire hazard area to determine the Structure Value Factor according to the following formula:

Equation 2 - Structure Value Factors
∑ (Structure Value
Factors)
≈
(Structure Weighting
Factor
∗
Average Improved
Value)
∗
(Land Weighting
Factor
∗
Average Total
Value)
∗
(Unit Density
Factor)
Where:
“Structure Weight Factor” = 10 to “weight” relative importance of structure over land. “Average Improved Value” is average of value of all improvements (e.g. structures), per property type, as provide by County Assessor records.

Land Weighting Factor = 1
“Average Total Value” is average of value of all land + improvements (e.g. structures), per property type, as provide by County Assessor records. County assessor land values were not used directly because experience has shown total values to be more comprehensive. “Unit Density Factor” corresponds values with units (i.e. “per residential unit” or “per acre”) based upon effective density of structure on parcel.

Figure 6 below is a tabulation of the Structure values for each property type as defined by Equation 2, above.

Figure 6 – Structure Value Factors
*For homes on an acre or less. For homes on more than one acre, the Structure Value Factor is increased by 0.0809 per acre
Property Type Structure Value Factor Unit
Single Family 1.0000 per each*
Multi-Family 0.3683 per res. unit
Commercial/Industrial 0.8187 per acre
Office 0.7058 per acre
Institutional 0.3841 per each
Storage 0.0952 per acre
Agricultural 0.0809 per acre
Rangeland 0.0181 per acre
Vacant 0.0324 per each
City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 25 ends

Residential Properties
All improved residential properties with a single residential dwelling unit on one acre or less are assigned one Single Family Equivalent or 1.0 SFE in the Foothill Zone. In the Extreme Foothill Zone, all improved residential properties on one acre or less are assessed 1.24 SFEs (See Table 5).

Residential properties on parcels that are larger than 1 acre receive additional benefit and are assigned additional SFEs on a “per acre” basis. Detached or attached houses, zero-lot line houses and town homes are included in this category.

Properties with more than one residential unit are designated as multi-family residential properties. These properties benefit from the Services in proportion to the number of dwelling units that occupy each property. The relative benefit for multi-family properties was determined as per Equation 1 to be 0.3683 SFEs per residential unit in the Foothill Zone and 0.4567 per residential unit in the Extreme Foothill Zone. This rate applies to condominiums as well.

Commercial/Industrial & Office Properties
Commercial and industrial properties are assigned benefit units per acre, since there is a relationship between parcel size, structure size and relative benefits. The relative benefit for commercial and industrial properties was determined as per Equation 1 to be 0.8187 SFEs per acre in the Foothill Zone and 1.0151 per acre in the Extreme Foothill Zone. The relative benefit for office properties was determined as per Equation 1 to be 0.7058 SFEs per acre in the Foothill Zone and 0.8751 per acre in the Extreme Foothill Zone.

Vacant/Undeveloped, Open Space and Agricultural Properties The relative benefit for vacant properties was determined as per Equation 1 to be 0.0324 SFEs per parcel in the Foothill Zone and 0.04012 per parcel in the Extreme Foothill Zone. Open space and agricultural land have minimal improvements and few, if any; structures that require defensible space, and are assigned benefit “per acre.” The relative benefit for open space properties was determined as per Equation 1 to be 0.0181 SFEs per acre in the Foothill Zone and 0.0224 per acre in the Extreme Foothill Zone. The relative benefit for agricultural properties was determined as per Equation 1 to be 0.0809 SFEs per acre in the Foothill Zone and 0.1002 per acre in the Extreme Foothill Zone.

Other Properties
Institutional properties, such as publicly owned properties (and are used as such), for example, churches, are assessed at 0.3841 per parcel in the Foothill zone and 0.4762 per Parcel in the Extreme Foothill zone. The relative benefit for storage properties was determined as per Equation 1 to be 0.0952 SFEs per acre in the Foothill Zone and 0.1180 per acre in the Extreme Foothill Zone.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 26 ends

Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution states that publicly owned properties shall not be exempt from assessment unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit.

All public properties that are specially benefited are assessed. Publicly owned property that is used for purposes similar to private residential, commercial, industrial or institutional uses is benefited and assessed at the same rate as such privately owned property.

Summary of Benefits for Each Property Type
Figure 7 summarizes the relative benefit for each property type.

Figure 7 - Relative Benefit Factors for Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones Foothill Zone
Extreme Foothill
Zone
Property Type
Benefit Factors
(SFEs) Unit
Benefit Factors
(SFEs) Unit
Single Family 1.0000 per each 1.2400 per each
Multi-Family 0.3683 per unit 0.4567 per unit
Commercial/Industrial 0.8187 per acre 1.0152 per acre
Office 0.7058 per acre 0.8752 per acre
Institutional 0.3841 per each 0.4763 per each
Storage 0.0952 per acre 0.1181 per acre
Agricultural 0.0809 per acre 0.1003 per acre
RangeLand 0.0181 per acre 0.0225 per acre
Vacant 0.0324 per each 0.0402 per each
Appeals of Assessments Levied to Property
Any property owner who feels that the assessment levied on the subject property is in error as a result of incorrect information being used to apply the foregoing method of assessment may file a written appeal with the Fire Chief of the City of Santa Barbara Fire Department or his or her designee. Any such appeal is limited to correction of an assessment during the then current fiscal year. Upon the filing of any such appeal, the Chief or his or her designee will promptly review the appeal and any information provided by the property owner. If the Chief or his or her designee finds that the assessment should be modified, the appropriate changes shall be made to the assessment roll. If any such changes are approved after the assessment roll has been filed with the County for collection, the Chief or his or her designee is authorized to refund to the property owner the amount of any approved reduction. Any dispute over the decision of the Chief or his or her designee shall be referred to the City Council and the decision of the Council shall be final.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 27 ends

Additional Background on Relative Benefit
In essence, when property owners are deciding how to cast their ballot for a proposed assessment, each property owner must weigh the perceived value of the Services proposed to them and their property with the proposed cost of the assessment to their property. If property owners of a certain type of property are either opposed or in support of the assessment in much greater percentages than owners of other property types, this is an indication that, as a group, these property owners perceive that the proposed assessment has relatively higher or lower “utility” or value to their property relative to owners of other property types. One can also infer from these hypothetical ballot results, that the apportionment of benefit (and assessments) was too high or too low for that property type. In other words, property owners, by their balloting, ultimately indicate if they perceive the special benefits to their property to exceed the cost of the assessment, and, as a group, whether the determined level of benefit and proposed assessment (the benefit apportionment made by the Assessment Engineer) is consistent with the level of benefits perceived by the owners of their type of property relative to the owners of other types of property.

Duration of the Assessment
The duration of the assessment is one year, and may be continued each year by a vote of the City Council. The assessment cannot be increased in future years without approval from property owners in another assessment ballot proceeding, except for an annual adjustment tied to the change in the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County Area Consumer Price Index, not to exceed 4% per year.

Criteria and Policies
This sub-section describes the criteria that shall govern the expenditure of assessment funds and ensures equal levels of benefit for properties of similar type. The criteria established in this Report, as finally confirmed, cannot be substantially modified; however, the Council may adopt additional criteria to further clarify certain criteria or policies established in this Report or to establish additional criteria or policies that do not conflict with this Report.

Assessment Funds Must Be Expended Within the Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones
The net available assessment funds, after incidental, administrative, financing and other costs, shall be expended exclusively for Services within the boundaries of the Assessment District, namely, the Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 28 ends

Existing General Funds
Prior to formation of the assessment, these Wildland Fire Services were funded with approximately $200,000 from the City of Santa Barbara general fund. A general fund contribution of at least $200,000 has been provided each year, and will continue to be provided in future years by the City, to the extent feasible.

This $200,000+ contribution, which comes in the form of direct funds and manpower, is used to support Wildland Fire Services throughout the City including the Coast area, as well as broad, citywide public outreach, planning and policy etc., and to pay for any and all general benefits from the assessment-related services, as required and as described on page 18, above.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 29 ends

4BAssessment
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Barbara is proceeding with the proposed levy of assessments under California Government Code sections 50078 et seq. (the “Code”) and Article XIIID of the California Constitution (the “Article”);
WHEREAS, the undersigned Engineer of Work has prepared and filed a report presenting an estimate of costs, a diagram for the Assessment District and an assessment of the estimated costs of the Services upon all assessable parcels within the Assessment District; NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned, by virtue of the power vested in me under said Code and Article and the order of the Council of said City, hereby make the following assessment to cover the portion of the estimated cost of said Services, and the costs and expenses incidental thereto to be paid by the Assessment District.

The amount to be paid for said Services and the expense incidental thereto, to be paid by the Assessment District for the fiscal year 2024-25 is generally as follows:

Summary Cost Estimate FY 2024-25
An Assessment Diagram is hereto attached and made a part hereof showing the exterior boundaries of said Assessment District. The distinctive number of each parcel or lot of land in said Assessment District is its Assessor Parcel Number appearing on the Assessment Roll.

Evacuation Planning – Evacuation Roadway Clearing $126,500 Defensible Space $150,116
Vegetation Management $72,973
Total for Installation, Maintenance and Servicing $349,589 Less: Contribution for General Benefits ($26,919)
Incidental Costs:

Administration and Project Management $6,485
Allowance for County collection $3,599
Subtotal – Incidentals $10,084
Total Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment Budget $332,754 Budget
City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 30 ends

I do hereby assess and apportion said net amount of the cost and expenses of said Services, including the costs and expenses incident thereto, upon the parcels and lots of land within said Assessment District, in accordance with the special benefits to be received by each parcel or lot, from the Services, and more particularly set forth in the Cost Estimate and Method of Assessment hereto attached and by reference made a part hereof.

The assessment is subject to an annual adjustment tied to the annual change in the Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County Area as of January of each succeeding year, with the maximum annual adjustment not to exceed 4%.

In the event that the actual assessment rate for any given year is not increased by an amount equal to the maximum of 4% or the yearly CPI change plus any CPI change in previous years that was in excess of 4%, the maximum authorized assessment shall increase by this amount. In such event, the maximum authorized assessment shall be equal to the base year assessment as adjusted by the increase to the CPI, plus any and all CPI adjustments deferred in any and all prior years. The CPI change above 4% can be used in a future year when the CPI adjustment is below 4%. From December 2022 to December 2023, the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County Area CPI increase is 3.47%.

The Assessment District will use 0.53% of banked CPI for fiscal year 2024-25. Hence, the proposed rates for 2024-25 will increase by 4.00% from the 2023-24 rates – from $95.86 to $99.70 per single family home in the Foothill Zone and from $118.87 to $123.63 per single family home in the Extreme Foothill Zone. The total revenue derived from the assessment is $332,754 for 2024-25.

Each parcel or lot of land is described in the Assessment Roll by reference to its parcel number as shown on the Assessor's Maps of the City of Santa Barbara for the fiscal year 2024-25. For a more particular description of said property, reference is hereby made to the deeds and maps on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder of Santa Barbara County.

I hereby place opposite the Assessor Parcel Number for each parcel or lot within the Assessment Roll, the amount of the assessment for the fiscal year 2024-25 for each parcel or lot of land within the said Assessment District.

Dated: March 29, 2024
Engineer of Work
By
John W. Bliss, License No. C052091
City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 31 ends

5BAssessment Diagram
The Assessment District includes all properties within the boundaries of the Wildland Fire Suppression District. The boundaries of the Assessment District are displayed on the following Assessment Diagram. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the Assessment District are those lines and dimensions as shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Santa Barbara, for fiscal year 2024-25, and are incorporated herein by reference, and made a part of this Diagram and this Report.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 32 ends

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 33 ends

5BAppendices
Appendix A – Assessment Roll, FY 2024-25
The Assessment Roll is made part of this report and is available for public inspection during normal office hours. Each lot or parcel listed on the Assessment Roll is shown and illustrated on the latest County Assessor records and these records are, by reference, made part of this report. There records shall govern for all details concerning the description of the lots of parcels.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 34 ends

Appendix B – California Government Code Section 50078 et. seq. 50078. Any local agency which provides fire suppression services directly or by contract with the state or a local agency may, by ordinance or by resolution adopted after notice and hearing, determine and levy an assessment for fire suppression services pursuant to this article. The assessment may be made for the purpose of obtaining, furnishing, operating, and maintaining fire suppression equipment or apparatus or for the purpose of paying the salaries and benefits of firefighting personnel, or both, whether or not fire suppression services are actually used by or upon a parcel, improvement, or property.
50078.1. As used in this article:
(a) "Legislative body" means the board of directors, trustees, governors, or any other governing body of a local agency specified in subdivision (b).
(b) "Local agency" means any city, county, or city and county, whether general law or chartered, or special district, including a county service area created pursuant to the County Service Area Law, Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section 25210.1) of Part 2 of Division 2 of Title 3. (c) "Fire suppression" includes firefighting and fire prevention, including, but not limited to, vegetation removal or management undertaken, in whole or in part, for the reduction of a fire hazard.
50078.2. (a) The ordinance or resolution shall establish uniform schedules and rates based upon the type of use of property and the risk classification of the structures or other improvements on, or the use of, the property. The risk classification may include, but need not be limited to, the amount of water required for fire suppression on that property, the structure size, type of construction, structure use, and other factors relating to potential fire and panic hazards and the costs of providing the fire suppression by the district to that property. The assessment shall be related to the benefits to the property assessed.
(b) The benefit assessment levies on land devoted primarily to agricultural, timber, or livestock uses, and being used for the commercial production of agricultural, timber, or livestock products, shall be related to the relative risk to the land and its products. The amount of the assessment shall recognize normal husbandry practices that serve to mitigate risk, onsite or proximate water availability, response time, capability of the fire suppression service, and any other factors which reflect the benefit to the land resulting from the fire suppression service provided. A benefit assessment shall not be levied for wildland or watershed fire suppression on land located in a state responsibility area as defined in Section 4102 of the Public Resources Code. This subdivision is not applicable to any benefit assessment levied prior to January 1, 1984, on land devoted primarily to agricultural, timber, or livestock uses.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 35 ends

50078.3. Any ordinance or resolution adopted by a local agency pursuant to this article establishing uniform schedules and rates for assessments for fire suppression services which substantially conforms with the model ordinance which the State Fire Marshal is authorized to adopt pursuant to Section 13111 of the Health and Safety Code shall be presumed to be in compliance with the requirements of Section 50078.2.
50078.4. The legislative body of the local agency shall cause to be prepared and filed with the clerk of the local agency a written report which shall contain all of the following:
(a) A description of each lot or parcel of property proposed to be subject to the assessment. (b) The amount of the assessment for each lot or parcel for the initial fiscal year. (c) The maximum amount of the assessment which may be levied for each lot or parcel during any fiscal year.
(d) The duration of the assessment.
(e) The basis of the assessment.
(f) The schedule of the assessment.
(g) A description specifying the requirements for protest and hearing procedures for the proposed assessment pursuant to Section 50078.6.
50078.5. (a) The legislative body may establish zones or areas of benefit within the local agency and may restrict the imposition of assessments to areas lying within one or more of the zones or areas of benefit established within the local agency.
(b) The benefit assessment shall be levied on a parcel, class of improvement to property, or use of property basis, or a combination thereof, within the boundaries of the local agency, zone, or area of benefit. The assessment may be levied against any parcel, improvement, or use of property to which such services may be made available whether or not the service is actually used. 50078.6. The clerk of the local agency shall cause the notice, protest, and hearing procedures to comply with Section 53753. The mailed notice shall also contain the name and telephone number of the person designated by the legislative body to answer inquiries regarding the protest proceedings.
50078.13. The local agency shall pay the county for costs, if any, incurred by the county in conducting the election. An election called by a legislative body pursuant to this article is subject to all provisions of the Elections Code applicable to elections called by the local agency. The local agency may recover the costs of the election and any other costs of preparing and levying the assessment from the proceeds of the assessment.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 36 ends

50078.16. The legislative body may provide for the collection of the assessment in the same manner, and subject to the same penalties as, other fees, charges, and taxes fixed and collected by, or on behalf of the local agency. If the assessments are collected by the county, the county may deduct its reasonable costs incurred for that service before remittal of the balance to the local agency's treasury.
50078.17. Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 860) of Title 10 of Part 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure applies to any judicial action or proceeding to validate, attack, review, set aside, void, or annul an ordinance or resolution levying an assessment or modifying or amending an existing ordinance or resolution. If an ordinance or resolution provides for an automatic adjustment in an assessment, and the automatic adjustment results in an increase in the amount of an assessment, any action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the increase shall be commenced within 90 days of the effective date of the increase. Any appeal from a final judgment in the action or proceeding brought pursuant to this section shall be filed within 30 days after entry of the judgment.
50078.19. This article does not limit or prohibit the levy or collection of any other fee, charge, assessment, or tax for fire suppression services authorized by any other provisions of law. 50078.20. Any fire protection district may specifically allocate a portion of the revenue generated pursuant to this article to pay the interest and that portion of the principal as will become due on an annual basis on indebtedness incurred pursuant to Section 8589.13 of this code and Section 13906 of the Health and Safety Code.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 37 ends

Appendix C – Article XIIID of the California Constitution Proposition 218 was approved by voters as a Constitutional Amendment on November 6, 1996.

It became Article XIIIC and Article XIIID of the California State Constitution and has imposed additional requirements for assessment districts. Following is a summary of the Article.

SEC.1. Application. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the provisions of this article shall apply to all assessments, fees and charges, whether imposed pursuant to state statute or local government charter authority. Nothing in this article or Article XIIIC shall be construed to:
(a) Provide any new authority to any agency to impose a tax, assessment, fee, or charge. (b) Affect existing laws relating to the imposition of fees or charges as a condition of property development.
(c) Affect existing laws relating to the imposition of timber yield taxes.

SEC. 2. Definitions. As used in this article:
(a) "Agency" means any local government as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 1 of Article XIIIC. (b) "Assessment" means any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property. "Assessment" includes, but is not limited to, "special assessment," "benefit assessment," "maintenance assessment" and "special assessment tax." (c) "Capital cost" means the cost of acquisition, installation, construction, reconstruction, or replacement of a permanent public improvement by an agency. (d) "District" means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service. (e) "Fee" or "charge" means any levy other than an ad valorem tax, a special tax, or an assessment, imposed by an agency upon a parcel or upon a person as an incident of property ownership, including a user fee or charge for a property related service. (f) "Maintenance and operation expenses" means the cost of rent, repair, replacement, rehabilitation, fuel, power, electrical current, care, and supervision necessary to properly operate and maintain a permanent public improvement.
(g) "Property ownership" shall be deemed to include tenancies of real property where tenants are directly liable to pay the assessment, fee, or charge in question.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 38 ends

(h) "Property-related service" means a public service having a direct relationship to property ownership.
(i) "Special benefit" means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute "special benefit." SEC. 3. Property Taxes, Assessments, Fees and Charges Limited. (a) No tax, assessment, fee, or charge shall be assessed by any agency upon any parcel of property or upon any person as an incident of property ownership except: (1) The ad valorem property tax imposed pursuant to Article XIII and Article XIIIA. (2) Any special tax receiving a two-thirds vote pursuant to Section 4 of Article XIIIA. (3) Assessments as provided by this article. (4) Fees or charges for property related services as provided by this article. (b) For purposes of this article, fees for the provision of electrical or gas service shall not be deemed charges or fees imposed as an incident of property ownership.

SEC. 4. Procedures and Requirements for All Assessments. (a) An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed. The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Only special benefits are assessable, and an agency shall separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel. Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit. (b) All assessments shall be supported by a detailed engineer's report prepared by a registered professional engineer certified by the State of California.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 39 ends

(c) The amount of the proposed assessment for each identified parcel shall be calculated and the record owner of each parcel shall be given written notice by mail of the proposed assessment, the total amount thereof chargeable to the entire district, the amount chargeable to the owner's particular parcel, the duration of the payments, the reason for the assessment and the basis upon which the amount of the proposed assessment was calculated, together with the date, time, and location of a public hearing on the proposed assessment. Each notice shall also include, in a conspicuous place thereon, a summary of the procedures applicable to the completion, return, and tabulation of the ballots required pursuant to subdivision (d), including a disclosure statement that the existence of a majority protest, as defined in subdivision (e), will result in the assessment not being imposed.
(d) Each notice mailed to owners of identified parcels within the district pursuant to subdivision (c) shall contain a ballot which includes the agency's address for receipt of the ballot once completed by any owner receiving the notice whereby the owner may indicate his or her name, reasonable identification of the parcel, and his or her support or opposition to the proposed assessment.
(e) The agency shall conduct a public hearing upon the proposed assessment not less than 45 days after mailing the notice of the proposed assessment to record owners of each identified parcel. At the public hearing, the agency shall consider all protests against the proposed assessment and tabulate the ballots. The agency shall not impose an assessment if there is a majority protest. A majority protest exists if, upon the conclusion of the hearing, ballots submitted in opposition to the assessment exceed the ballots submitted in favor of the assessment. In tabulating the ballots, the ballots shall be weighted according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected property. (f) In any legal action contesting the validity of any assessment, the burden shall be on the agency to demonstrate that the property or properties in question receive a special benefit over and above the benefits conferred on the public at large and that the amount of any contested assessment is proportional to, and no greater than, the benefits conferred on the property or properties in question.
(g) Because only special benefits are assessable, electors residing within the district who do not own property within the district shall not be deemed under this Constitution to have been deprived of the right to vote for any assessment. If a court determines that the Constitution of the United States or other federal law requires otherwise, the assessment shall not be imposed unless approved by a two-thirds vote of the electorate in the district in addition to being approved by the property owners as required by subdivision (e).

SEC. 5. Effective Date.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 40 ends

Pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 10 of Article II, the provisions of this article shall become effective the day after the election unless otherwise provided. Beginning July 1, 1997, all existing, new, or increased assessments shall comply with this article. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the following assessments existing on the effective date of this article shall be exempt from the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4:
(a) Any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital costs or maintenance and operation expenses for sidewalks, streets, sewers, water, flood control, drainage systems or vector control.

Subsequent increases in such assessments shall be subject to the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4.
(b) Any assessment imposed pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment is initially imposed. Subsequent increases in such assessments shall be subject to the procedures and approval process set forth in Section

4. (c) Any assessment the proceeds of which are exclusively used to repay bonded indebtedness of which the failure to pay would violate the Contract Impairment Clause of the Constitution of the United States.
(d) Any assessment which previously received majority voter approval from the voters voting in an election on the issue of the assessment. Subsequent increases in those assessments shall be subject to the procedures and approval process set forth in Section 4.

City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 41 ends

End Notes
1 Insurance Services Offices Inc.

HUhttp://www.rockwall.com/FireDepartment/Insurance%20Services%20Office%20Rating%20Infor mation.pdfU
2 Institute for Business & Home Safety, “Protect Your Home Against Wildfire Damage,” HUhttp://www.ibhs.org/publications/view.asp?id=125 U
3 Institute for Business & Home Safety, “Is Your Home Protected from Wildfire Damage? A Homeowner’s Guide to Retrofit,” HUhttp://www.ibhs.org/publications/view.asp?id=130 U 4 U.S. Fire Administration, Department of Homeland Security, “America Burning, Recommissioned: Principal Findings and Recommendations,” p.1, HUhttp://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/abr-rep.PDFU
5 U.S. Fire Administration, Department of Homeland Security, “America Burning, Recommissioned: Principal Findings and Recommendations,” p.2, HUhttp://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/abr-rep.PDFU
6 Insurance Services Offices Inc., p. 1,
HUhttp://www.rockwall.com/FireDepartment/Insurance%20Services%20Office%20Rating%20Infor mation.pdfU
7 Renewable Natural Resources Foundation, “Workshop on National Parks Fire Policy: Goals, Perceptions, and Reality,” Renewable Resources Journal, Volume 11, Number 1, Spring 1993, p. 6 8 Weldon, Leslie A. C., “Dealing with Public Concerns in Restoring Fire to the Forest,” General Technical Report INT-GTR-341 The Use of Fire in Forest Restoration, U.S. Forest Service, June 1996, p. 3
9 U.S. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture, “Social Science to Improve Fuels Management:

A Synthesis of Research on Aesthetics and Fuels Management,” p. 1, HUhttp://ncrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_nc261.pdfU
City of Santa Barbara
Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment
Engineer’s Report, FY 2024-25

Page 42 ends

10 U.S. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture, “Social Science to Improve Fuels Management:

A Synthesis of Research on Aesthetics and Fuels Management,” p. 25, HUhttp://ncrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_nc261.pdfU
11 Weldon, Leslie A. C., “Dealing with Public Concerns in Restoring Fire to the Forest,” General Technical Report INT-GTR-341 The Use of Fire in Forest Restoration, U.S. Forest Service, June 1996, p. 2

Page 1 of 3 ends

RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA BARBARA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO

CONTINUE THE WILDLAND FIRE SUPPRESSION

ASSESSMENT WITHIN THE FOOTHILL AND
EXTREME FOOTHILL ZONES; DECLARING THE

WORK TO BE OF MORE THAN GENERAL OR

ORDINARY BENEFIT AND DESCRIBING THE

DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COSTS
AND EXPENSES THEREOF; PRELIMINARILY
APPROVING THE UPDATED ENGINEER’S REPORT;

STATING INTENTION TO CONTINUE
ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025 AND
ESTABLISHING A TIME OF 2:00 P.M. ON TUESDAY
May 21, 2024, IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS

FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE WILDLAND FIRE

SUPPRESSION ASSESSMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Barbara is authorized, pursuant to the authority provided in California Government Code Section 50078 et seq. and Article XIIID of the California Constitution, to levy assessments for fire suppression services; and WHEREAS, an assessment for fire suppression has been given the distinctive designation of the “Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment” (“Assessment”), and is primarily described as encompassing the Foothill and Extreme Foothill zones as defined in the Wildland Fire Plan of 2004; and
WHEREAS, the Assessment was authorized by an assessment ballot proceeding conducted in 2006 and approved by 51% of the weighted ballots returned by property owners, and such assessments were levied by the City of Santa Barbara City Council by Resolution No. 06-064 passed on July 11, 2006;
WHEREAS, although the methodology by which the assessments are applied to properties in the District does not change from year to year, a new Engineer’s Report is prepared each year in order to establish the CPI adjustment for that year; the new maximum authorized assessment rate for that year; the budget for that year; and the amount to be charged to each parcel in the District that year, subject to that year’s assessment rate and any changes in the attributes of the properties in the District, including but not limited to use changes, parcel subdivisions, and/or parcel consolidations; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA AS FOLLOWS:

Page 2 of 3 ends

SECTION 1. SCI Consulting Group, the Engineer of Work, has prepared an engineer’s report in accordance with Article XIIID of the California Constitution. The Report has been made, filed with the City Clerk and duly considered by the Council and is hereby deemed sufficient and preliminarily approved. The Report shall stand as the Engineer's Report for all subsequent proceedings under and pursuant to the foregoing resolution.

SECTION 2. It is the intention of this Council to continue to levy and collect assessments for the Wildland Fire Suppression Assessment for fiscal year 2024-25. Within the Assessment District, the proposed services to be funded by the assessments (“Services”) are generally described as including but not limited to, the following: (1) continuation of the vegetation road clearance program to cover all public roads within the Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones (continuing this program will reduce fuel, enhance evacuation routes, and decrease fire response times); (2) enhancing the defensible space fire prevention inspection and assistance program for all properties in the Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones; and (3) implementation of a vegetation management program in the Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones. As applied herein, “vegetation road clearance” means the treatment, clearing, reducing, or changing of vegetation near roadways in the Foothill and Extreme Foothill Zones where vegetation poses a fire hazard and does not meet Fire Department Vegetation Road Clearance Standards within the high fire hazard area (as provided in Santa Barbara Municipal Code Section 8.04.020.M). “Defensible space” is a perimeter created around a structure where vegetation is treated, cleared or reduced to slow the spread of wildfire towards a structure, reduce the chance of a structure fire burning to the surrounding area, and provides a safe perimeter for firefighters to protect a structure (as provided in Chapter 49, Section 4907 "Requirements For Wildland-Urban Interface Areas, Defensible Space" as adopted by the City of Santa Barbara pursuant to Santa Barbara Municipal Code Section

8.04.010). “Vegetation management” means the reduction of fire hazard through public education, vegetation hazard reduction, and other methods as needed to manage vegetation in areas with unique hazards such as heavy, flammable vegetation, lack of access due to topography and roads, and/or firefighter safety.

SECTION 3. The estimated fiscal year 2024-25 cost of providing the Services is $332,754. This cost results in a proposed assessment rate of NINETY NINE DOLLARS AND SEVENTY CENTS ($99.70) per singlefamily equivalent benefit unit in the Foothill Zone and ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY THREE DOLLARS AND SIXTY THREE CENTS ($123.63) in the Extreme Foothill Zone for fiscal year 2024-25. The Assessments include a provision for an annual increase equal to the change in the Los

Page 3 of 3 ends

Angeles-Riverside-Orange County Area Consumer Price Index (“CPI), not to exceed 4% (four percent) per year without a further vote or balloting process. The actual CPI for 2024-25 is 3.47% and the total allowable CPI adjustment for 2024-25 is 4.00%, using banked CPI from previous years.

The rates have been adjusted accordingly.

SECTION 4. The public hearing shall be held, before the City Council in the City of Santa Barbara City Council Chambers, located at 735 Anacapa Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 as follows: on Tuesday, May 21, 2024 at or soon after the hour of 2:00 p.m. for the purpose of this Council’s determination whether the public interest, convenience and necessity require the Services and this Council’s final action upon the Report and the assessments therein.

SECTION 5. The clerk of the council shall cause a notice of the hearing to be given by publishing a notice, at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing above-specified, in a newspaper circulated in the City.

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: May 7, 2024
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Interim City Administrator/Director or Emergency Services SUBJECT: Termination of Local Emergency Declaration [Resolution] RECOMMENDATION:

That Council adopt, by reading of title only, a Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Terminating the Declaration of Local Emergency Pursuant to Government Code Section 8630 Proclaimed by the Director of Emergency Services on February 1, 2024 and Ratified by the City Council on February 6, 2024.

DISCUSSION:

On February 1, 2024, the Interim City Administrator, acting in the capacity of Director of Emergency Services, proclaimed a local emergency due to conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property caused by storms and flooding. The City Council ratified the proclamation on February 6, 2024, pursuant to the authority under Government Code Section 8630. This statute requires the City Council to review the need for continuing the local emergency at least once every 60 days and to proclaim the termination of the local emergency at the earliest possible date that the conditions warrant.

On March 19, 2024, the Director of Emergency Services deemed it necessary to extend the Local Emergency Proclamation in response to this local emergency due to extreme peril to the safety of persons and property that continue to exist resulting from damage to property and infrastructure from the intense rainfall, flooding, and wind from the storms commencing on or about January 31, 2024.

The Director of Emergency Services has reported on the actions taken in response to the local emergency and has advised that it is not necessary to continue the local emergency.

The City will continue to seek to recover costs and may continue to exercise authority under any federal, state, or county emergency or disaster declaration arising from or related to the storms and floods that gave rise to the City’s declaration of local emergency.

Agenda Item No. 5
File Code No. 520.02
Council Agenda Report
Termination of Local Emergency Declaration [Resolution] May 7, 2024

Page 2 ends

PREPARED BY: Tava Ostrenger, Acting City Attorney
SUBMITTED BY: Tava Ostrenger, Acting City Attorney
APPROVED BY: City Administrator's Office
1 RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA

BARBARA TERMINATING THE DELCARATION OF LOCAL

EMERGENCY PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 8630 PROCLAIMED BY THE DIRECTOR OF
EMERGENCY SERVICES ON FEBRUARY 1, 2024 AND
RATIFIED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY 6, 2024

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA THAT:

1. Government Code Sections 8558 and 8630, et seq., and Chapter 9.116 of the Santa Barbara Municipal Code empower the Director of Emergency Services to proclaim the existence or threatened existence of a local emergency when the City is affected or likely to be affected by a public calamity and the City Council is not in session, subject to ratification by the City Council within seven days of the proclamation.

2. Conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property arose within the City of Santa Barbara because of intense rainfall, flooding, and wind commencing on or about January 31, 2024, at which time the City Council was not in session.

3. The Director of Emergency Services of the City of Santa Barbara proclaimed the existence of a local emergency within the City of Santa Barbara on February 1, 2024, at which time the Council was not in session.

4. The local emergency conditions as proclaimed by the Director of Emergency Services continued and the emergency proclamation issued by the Director of Emergency Services on February 1, 2024, was ratified by the Council on February 6, 2024 by Resolution No. 24-011.

5. On March 19, 2024, the Director of Emergency Services deemed it necessary to extend the Local Emergency Proclamation in response to this local emergency due to extreme peril to the safety of persons and property that continue to exist resulting from damage to property and infrastructure from the intense rainfall, flooding, and wind from the storms commencing on or about January 31, 2024.

6. Upon the recommendation of the Director of Emergency Services the local emergency described in this Resolution is terminated. Nothing in this Resolution shall be construed to affect the City’s ability to recover costs or exercise authority under any 2 federal, state, or county emergency or disaster declaration arising from or related to the storms and floods that gave rise to the City’s declaration of local emergency.

7. Pursuant to Government Code Section 8630, the Director of Emergency Services is directed to place this Resolution for review by the City Council on the agenda of a regular meeting within the time period required by law.

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: May 7, 2024
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Water Resources Division, Public Works Department SUBJECT: WaterSMART Grant Acceptance for Water-Wise Landscape Rebate Program [Resolution]
RECOMMENDATION:

That Council adopt, by reading of title only, A Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending Resolution No. 23-076, Adopting the Budget for Fiscal Year 2024, to Appropriate Funds for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation WaterSMART Grant for the WaterWise Landscape Rebate Program.

DISCUSSION:

The City of Santa Barbara (City) collaborated with the County of Santa Barbara (County) on the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) WaterSMART Water-Wise Landscape Rebate Program (Program), with the City acting as a secondary grant recipient. The County will administer the Program for the City as well as the other partnering agencies in the grant program. The other agencies are: Carpinteria Valley Water District, Montecito Water District, Goleta Water District, City of Solvang, City of Guadalupe, and City of Santa Maria. The funding request for the rebates includes a variety of measures such as:
 Implementing a landscape rebate program for nonagricultural customers for irrigation efficiency retrofits, native and water-wise plants, and turfgrass removal;  Tracking participating customers’ monthly water usage at the end of the grant period and comparing it to water usage from a year before the landscape transformation is completed; and
 Tracking the number of rebates issued and including in its records the square footage of turfgrass that is converted to water-efficient landscaping under this Agreement.

The grant is for a two-year period with up to $436,667 local cost share provided by the County and the partnering agencies. The City’s cost share will be up to $160,000 over the next two fiscal years with the City’s grant amount being up to $106,000.

This joint grant award administered through the County enables the City, along with other partnering agencies, to achieve economies of scale by banding together under one umbrella to apply for and administer grant funds, as well as meet the grant funding Agenda Item No. 6
File Code No. 540.05
Council Agenda Report
WaterSMART Grant Acceptance for Water-Wise Landscape Rebate Program [Resolution] May 7, 2024

Page 2 ends

application threshold which could not have been met individually. Similar regional grant efforts for prior USBR WaterSMART grants were successfully implemented in 2009 and 2014 for water-wise landscape rebate programs.

The City will use the grant funds to modify its existing Sustainable Lawn Replacement Rebate that was launched in January 2023. The Sustainable Lawn Replacement Rebate provides incentives to help offset the cost of replacing water-thirsty lawns and spray irrigation with water-wise plants and efficient irrigation. Projects must be approved in advance and the rebate amount is based upon square footage of turf removed and customer classification.

The Water Resources Division and Creeks Division have developed a partnership to offer stacked incentives to reduce irrigation water use and divert stormwater to permeable landscapes to reduce runoff and pollutants. Eligible projects that disconnect downspout(s) that previously directed rainwater onto impervious surfaces and instead redirect the water to the landscape will receive an additional $250 per project, provided by the Creeks Division. Customers can get started with the rebate by visiting SantaBarbaraCA.gov/LawnRebate and submitting an eligibility request form online.

Photos of the lawn to be replaced must be included before work has started.

The Sustainable Lawn Replacement Rebate follows the success of the previous landscape rebate that was in place from 2009 to 2020 and was also funded by two previous USBR WaterSMART grants. A total of 1,626 rebates were issued during the previous rebate program with an average monthly water savings of 32% per property.

Current grant funds will be used to increase the dollar amount per square foot of lawn replaced as well as the project maximum rebate amount for each site. Water-wise landscaping plays a key role in our community’s success in water use reduction (both short-term and long-term) and our ability to adapt to climate challenges.

BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

The City will receive up to $106,000 from the USBR grant. The cost to the City will be matching up to $160,000 over the next two fiscal years, which is a planned expense for the Water Fund.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Estimated water savings for the City’s portion of the grant program is 34 acre-feet per year. The expected lifetime of the converted landscapes is estimated to be 15 years.

The cumulative water savings for the regional WaterSMART grant project is estimated to be 1,840 acre-feet.

Council Agenda Report
WaterSMART Grant Acceptance for Water-Wise Landscape Rebate Program [Resolution] May 7, 2024

Page 3 ends

WATER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:

This item was presented to the Water Commission at its meeting on April 18, 2024, and the Commission voted 3-0-2 in support of staff’s recommendation.

PREPARED BY: Joshua Haggmark, P.E., Water Resources Manager/GC/lm SUBMITTED BY: Clifford M. Maurer, P.E., Public Works Director APPROVED BY: City Administrator’s Office
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA BARBARA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 23-076,
ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024, TO
APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR THE U.S. BUREAU OF
RECLAMATION WATERSMART GRANT FOR THE WATERWISE LANDSCAPE REBATE PROGRAM WHEREAS, in accordance with the City Charter, the City Administrator filed with the Council a proposed budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2023; WHEREAS, the City Council is required to adopt a budget before the beginning of the fiscal year on July 1, 2023;
WHEREAS, the City Charter provides that at any public meeting after the adoption of the budget, the City Council may amend or supplement the budget by motion adopted by the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the total members of the City Council; and WHEREAS, as authorized by Resolution No. 23-076, this Resolution approves the amendment to the budget as provided herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA THAT in accordance with the provisions of Section 1205 of the City Charter, the budget for the Fiscal Year 2024, as adopted by Resolution No. 23-076, is hereby amended as follows:

SECTION 1. The Council accepts the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation WaterSMART grant for the Water-Wise Landscape Rebate Program, administered through the County of Santa Barbara.

SECTION 2. The Council approves an increase in revenue and expenditure appropriations in the Water Operating Fund budget in Fiscal Year 2024 in the amount of $106,000, funded by U.S. Bureau of Reclamation WaterSMART grant funds, for the Water-Wise Landscape Rebate Program.

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: May 7, 2024
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Engineering Division, Public Works Department
SUBJECT: Joint Powers Agreement with Santa Barbara County Association of Governments for Facilitating Regional Broadband Planning [Agreement]
RECOMMENDATION:

That Council authorize the Interim City Administrator to execute the second amendment of the Joint Powers Agreement with the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments related to facilitating regional broadband planning.

DISCUSSION:

The Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG) is a regional planning agency comprised of the County of Santa Barbara (County) and all eight incorporated cities, including the City of Santa Barbara (City). In December of 2022, SBCAG adopted a Broadband Strategic Plan (Plan) for the region. The development of this Plan included outreach within the City and a presentation to City Council. Broadband is a general term referring to infrastructure and equipment necessary for high-speed internet access. The purpose of this Plan was to identify gaps in service or access and the strategic steps or policies that each entity within SBCAG should take moving forward.

SBCAG and the City memorialized this Plan and agency relationship in a Joint Powers Agreement. This second amendment would add the SBCAG’s responsibility for facilitating regional broadband internet access and service or related telecommunications services.

The City retains its authority for “last-mile” broadband and telecommunication permitting.

The partnership with SBCAG helps the City by way of coordinating issues, “middle-mile” projects, and sharing resources within the region.

BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

This action has no financial/budget impact on the City.

Agenda Item No. 7
File Code No. 150.03
Council Agenda Report
Joint Powers Agreement with Santa Barbara County Association of Governments for Facilitating Regional Broadband Planning [Agreement]
May 7, 2024

Page 2 ends

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

The deployment and equitable access to broadband allows for residents and businesses to do things in new ways, which provides for more opportunity for remote work, education, etc.

A copy of the contract may be requested from the Public Works Department for public review by contacting [email protected].

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The Joint Powers Agreement with SBCAG for Facilitating Regional Broadband Planning falls outside of the definition of a “Project” under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15378 (b)(5) as administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct physical changes in the environment; as such, regional broadband planning is not subject to CEQA environmental review. Future projects that are developed from the Plan will be subject to CEQA review and will likely be exempt under Public Resources Code 21080.51 and Senate Bill 156, which exempts “middle-mile” and “lastmile” planning efforts and construction projects to provide broadband service.

PREPARED BY: Brian D’Amour, P.E., City Engineer/AH/nv
SUBMITTED BY: Clifford M. Maurer, P.E., Public Works Director APPROVED BY: City Administrator’s Office

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: May 7, 2024
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: City Clerk’s Office, City Administrator’s Office
SUBJECT: Interviews For City Advisory Groups
RECOMMENDATION:

That Council hold interviews of applicants to various City Advisory Groups (Estimated time: 3:00 p.m.).

DISCUSSION:

Interviews of applicants for various positions on City Advisory Groups were held on May 7, 2024, at an estimated time of 3:00 p.m. Interviews were also held on April 23, 2024, at an estimated time of 4:00 p.m., and on April 30, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. (estimated time).

For the current 53 vacancies, 56 individuals submitted 61 applications. A list of eligible applicants and pertinent information about the City Advisory Groups is attached to this report.

Applicants have been notified that to be considered for appointment they must be interviewed. Applicants have been requested to prepare a two-to-three-minute verbal presentation, in response to a set of questions. Those questions are specific to the group for which they are applying. Applicants applying to more than one advisory group may have up to five minutes for their presentation.

Appointments are scheduled to take place on June 11, 2024.

ATTACHMENT: List of Applicants
PREPARED BY: Norma Welche, Deputy City Clerk
SUBMITTED BY: Sarah Knecht, Interim City Administrator
APPROVED BY: City Administrator's Office
Agenda Item No. 8
File Code No. 140.05

ATTACHMENT
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 1
Semiannual Recruitment 2024

ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW
 One vacancy.
 Term Expirations:
 December 31, 2027 – Licensed Architect
 Qualifications/Category: Members need not be qualified electors* of the City at the time of appointment so long as they are qualified electors* of the County and remain so during their term. Member must be a licensed architect.  Appointees may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government.

CATEGORY
(Number of
Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Carolyn Adams Qualified Elector – City
William Anderson Qualified Elector – City Licensed Architect – City/County (1)
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 2
May 2, 2024

ARTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
 Two vacancies.
 Term Expirations:
 December 31, 2025
 December 31, 2027
 Qualifications/Category: Members may be residents of the South Coast area of Santa Barbara County. Members should be persons who demonstrate an interest in and commitment to cultural and arts activities.  Appointees may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government.

CATEGORY
(Number of
Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Terri Ball Com Events & Festivals Applicant
Carole Goodman
Diane Mackenzie
Sophia Rasura Com Events & Festivals Applicant
Soheyla Valleie
City/County Resident
(2)
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 3
May 2, 2024

BUILDING AND FIRE CODE BOARD OF APPEALS
 Five vacancies.
 Term Expirations:
 June 30, 2026
 June 30, 2028
 Qualifications/Category: Residents of the City or the adjoining area of Santa Barbara County who demonstrate knowledge and expertise in specialty areas governed by the construction and fire codes of the City.  Appointees may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government.

CATEGORY
(Number of
Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Nick Koonce 12/6/2016
(5 years, 6 months)
John Maloney 6/28/2016
(6 years)
Term expired 6/30/2022; continuing to
serve until successor is appointed.

City/County Resident
(5)
Paul Spieler 12/6/2016
(5 years, 6 months)
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 4
May 2, 2024

CENTRAL COAST COMMISSION FOR SENIOR CITIZENS
 One vacancy.
 Term Expirations:
 June 30, 2026
 Qualifications/Categories: Resident of the City.
 Appointee may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government, and for one year after ceasing to be a member, shall not be eligible for any salaried office or employment with the City.

CATEGORY
(Number of
Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
E Howard Green 6/18/2019
(5 years) Resident of the City (1)
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 5
May 2, 2024
CITIZEN’S OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
 Two vacancies.
 Term Expirations:
 December 31, 2026
 Qualifications/Categories: One appointee must be a qualified elector* of the City; remaining appointee may be an elector not living in the City. One appointee must also be a representative of the hospitality community.  Appointee may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government, and for one year after ceasing to be a member, shall not be eligible for any salaried office or employment with the City.

CATEGORY
(Number of
Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Qualified Elector –
City/Non-City (1)
Representative of the
Hospitality Community
– City/Non-City (1)
NONE
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 6
May 2, 2024

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
 One vacancy.
 Term Expiration:
 December 31, 2026
 Qualifications/Categories: Qualified elector of the City.  Appointee may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government, and for one year after ceasing to be a member, shall not be eligible for any salaried office or employment with the City.

CATEGORY
(Number of
Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Qualified Elector of the Craig Smith
City (1)
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 7
May 2, 2024

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE
 Five vacancies.
 Term Expirations:
 December 31, 2024 (Downtown Area Neighborhood)
 December 31, 2026 (Business Community)
 December 31, 2027 (Westside/Lower Westside Neighborhood; Human Services Organization; Latino Community)  Qualifications/Category: Members must be employees or residents of the designated organizations/neighborhoods and be qualified electors of the County.
 Human Services Organization;
 Downtown Area Neighborhood;
 Business Community
 Westside/Lower Westside Neighborhood; and
 Latino Community
 Appointees may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government.

CATEGORY
(Number of Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Business Community (1)
Downtown Neighborhood (1)
Human Services Organization
(1)
Latino Community (1)
Westside/Lower Westside
Neighborhood (1)
NONE
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 8
May 2, 2024

COMMUNITY EVENTS AND FESTIVALS COMMITTEE
 Three vacancies.
 Term Expiration:
 December 31, 2027
 Qualifications/Category: Members must represent one of the following categories:
 Business/Lodging/Retail Industry; and
 Cultural Arts.
 Appointees may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government.

CATEGORY
(Number of Vacancies)
APPLICANT Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Roger Perry
Dacia Harwood Business/Lodging/Retail
Industry (2)
Teri Ball Arts Advisory Cte Applicant
Cultural Arts (1) Sophia Rasura Arts Advisory Cte Applicant Terra Taylor Sister Cities Board Applicant
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 9
May 2, 2024

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA LIBRARY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
 One vacancy.
 Term Expirations:
 June 30, 2025
 Qualifications/Categories: Resident of the City.
 Appointee may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government, and for one year after ceasing to be a member, shall not be eligible for any salaried office or employment with the City.

CATEGORY
(Number of
Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Amber Caldwell 6/27/2023
(1 year) Resident of the City (1)
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 10
May 2, 2024

CREEKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
 One vacancy.
 Term Expiration: December 31, 2027
 Qualifications/Category: Appointees may be a City or non-City resident and must meet the following categories:
 Member with some experience in ocean use, business, environmental issues, and/or provide community at large representation.
 Appointees may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government.

CATEGORY
(Number of Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Conway “Todd” Rulon-Miller Non-City Resident
Wendy Wittl City Resident
City/non-City Resident
(1)
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 11
May 2, 2024

DOWNTOWN PARKING COMMITTEE
 One vacancy.
 Term Expiration: December 31, 2027
 Qualifications/Categories: Member must be a qualified elector* of the City or County of Santa Barbara.  Appointee may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government.

CATEGORY
(Number of
Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Wesley McRae County Resident
Anita Stahl City Resident City/County Resident
(1)
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 12
May 2, 2024

HOUSING AUTHORITY COMMISSION
 Three vacancies.
 Term Expirations:
 June 30, 2026 (Senior Tenant and Tenant); and
 September 14, 2028 (Public at Large)
 Qualifications/Category: Members should have some interest and background in housing development, management, or other comparable experience. One member may be a non-City resident.  Senior Tenant over the age of 62 who is receiving housing assistance from the Housing Authority;  Tenant who is receiving housing assistance from the Housing Authority; and  Member representing the Public at Large.
 Appointees may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government.

CATEGORY
(Number of Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Kirsten S Ellis City Resident
Lang Sligh City Resident
Public at Large –
City/Non-City (1)
Megan Turley City Resident
Mary Fenger 11/12/2019
(4 years, 7 months) City Resident
Senior Tenant –
City/Non-City (1)
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 13
May 2, 2024

LIVING WAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
 Two vacancies.
 Term Expirations:
 June 30, 2026 (Public at Large)
 June 30, 2027 (Owner/Manager of a service contractor subject to the City’s Living Wage Ordinance)  Qualifications/Categories: Appointee must meet one of the following qualifications:
 Owner/Manager of a service contractor subject to the City’s Living Wage Ordinance; or  Represent the public at large.
 Appointees may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government.

CATEGORY
(Number of Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Owner/Manager of a service
contractor subject to the
City’s Living Wage Ordinance
(1)
Public at Large (1)
NONE
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 14
May 2, 2024

NEIGHBORHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL
 Nine vacancies.
 Term Expirations:
 December 31, 2024 (Neighborhood Representative- 2; and Public at large- 1)  December 31, 2026 (Neighborhood Representative- 3)
 December 31, 2027 (Neighborhood Representative- 2; and Public at large- 1)  Qualifications/Categories: Public at large representatives may reside anywhere within City limits. Neighborhood representatives must be residents of the following neighborhoods, and no more than three members can represent one specific neighborhood:
 Eastside (3 openings);
 Lower Eastside (3 openings);
 Laguna (3 openings);
 West Downtown (3 openings);
 Westside (3 opening);
 Lower Westside (2 openings); and
 Public at Large (2 openings).
 Appointees may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government.

CATEGORY
(Number of
Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Sebastian Aldana JR 03/01/2011
(12 years, 9 months)
- Term expired 12/31/2023
- Eastside Neighborhood Neighborhood
Representative or
Public at Large (9) Zachary Kramer Westside Neighborhood *Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 15
May 2, 2024

PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
 One vacancy.
 Term Expiration:
 June 30, 2025 (Youth Intern**); and
 December 31, 2023 (Qualified Elector)
 Qualifications/Categories: Members of the Commission must be qualified electors* of the City.  **Youth Intern: One youth intern who is not a member of the Commission and is a high school student volunteer who resides within the Santa Barbara High School District or attends other high schools within the City limits and is nominated by the principal of the student’s high school. The student shall be either in their junior or senior year of high school and shall be and remain a student in good standing as is determined by the high school. A student that graduates shall not serve for more than three (3) months following graduation.  Appointees may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government.

CATEGORY
(Number of
Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Youth Intern (1)
Qualified Elector of
the City (1)
NONE
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 16
May 2, 2024

RENTAL HOUSING MEDIATION BOARD
 Four vacancies.
 Term Expiration:
 December 31, 2025 (Tenant Mediator- 1)
 December 31, 2027 (Tenant Mediator- 1; Landlord Mediator- 2)  Qualifications/Categories: The majority of members (8) must be residents of the City of Santa Barbara. Non-City resident members must reside in a jurisdiction which contracts with the Rental Housing Mediation Program for services (currently Goleta and Carpinteria). Members must represent one of the following specific categories:
 Landlord Mediator who owns or manages residential properties for consideration or compensation, whether single or multiple units;
 Tenant Mediator who rents or leases a dwelling with no ownership of residential properties; and  Appointees may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government.

CATEGORY
(Number of
Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Scott Barash Non-City Resident Landlord Mediator
– City/County (2) Michelle Roberson Non-City Resident
E Howard Green City Resident Tenant Mediator –
City/County (2)
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 17
May 2, 2024

SANTA BARBARA YOUTH COUNCIL
 Eight vacancies.
 Term Expirations:
 June 30, 2025 (Public at Large- 1)
 June 30, 2026 (SBUSD High School students- 3; Local Private HS/Independent Studies- 1; Local Alt/Com/Cont’n- 2; Public at large- 1)
 Qualifications/Categories: Members must be between the ages of 13-19 years and may be residents of the City or County. Majority of members must be City residents. Members must represent the following:
 Three members must be from students attending a Santa Barbara Union School District high school:
o San Marcos High School, Santa Barbara High School, and Dos Pueblos High School. No more than 3 members can be from any one High School:
 SMHS (2 openings) ;SBHS (no openings); DPHS (1 openings)  One member must be a student attending a Local Private School or independent studies;  Two members representing the Public at Large; and
 Two members must be students from a local alternative, community, or continuation high school.  Note: Up to 5 new members may be County residents.
 Note: All applicants also fit the category of Public at Large.

Applicants must appear for an interview before the Santa Barbara Youth Council and City Council.

CATEGORY
(Number of
Vacancies) APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Kaarlo Anderson DPHS (County)
Parikshit Mehta DPHS (County)
Gabriele Scussat DPHS (County)
Clara Stump 6/28/2022
(2 years) SMHS (County)
Naomi Walsh DPHS (County)
SBUSD High School –
City/County (3)
Kieran Stone DPHS (City)
CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE.
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 18
May 2, 2024
SANTA BARBARA YOUTH COUNCIL (cont’d)
 Eight vacancies.
 Term Expirations:
 June 30, 2025 (Public at Large- 1)
 June 30, 2026 (SBUSD High School students- 3; Local Private HS/Independent Studies- 1; Local Alt/Com/Cont’n- 2; Public at large- 1)
 Qualifications/Categories: Members must be between the ages of 13-19 years and may be residents of the City or County. Majority of members must be City residents. Members must represent the following:
 Three members must be from students attending a Santa Barbara Union School District high school:
o San Marcos High School, Santa Barbara High School, and Dos Pueblos High School. No more than 3 members can be from any one High School:
 SMHS (2 openings) ;SBHS (no openings); DPHS (1 openings)  One member must be a student attending a Local Private School or independent studies;  Two members representing the Public at Large; and
 Two members must be students from a local alternative, community, or continuation high school.  Note: Up to 5 new members may be County residents.
 Note: All applicants also fit the category of Public at Large.

Applicants must appear for an interview before the Santa Barbara Youth Council and City Council.

CATEGORY
(Number of
Vacancies) APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd) Notes
Chloe Boyd BDHS (County)
Eloise Lowther-Phillips LBS (County)
Sonia Marquez Miranda BDHS (County)
Micaela White Dual Enrollment: HCS/SBCC (City)
Local Private High
School/Independent
Studies – City/County
(1)
Sindy Zavala 12/5/2023
(6 months) BDHS (County)
CONTINUED ON THE NEXT PAGE.
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 19
May 2, 2024
SANTA BARBARA YOUTH COUNCIL (cont’d)
 Eight vacancies.
 Term Expirations:
 June 30, 2025 (Public at Large- 1)
 June 30, 2026 (SBUSD High School students- 3; Local Private HS/Independent Studies- 1; Local Alt/Com/Cont’n- 2; Public at large- 1)
 Qualifications/Categories: Members must be between the ages of 13-19 years and may be residents of the City or County. Majority of members must be City residents. Members must represent the following:
 Three members must be from students attending a Santa Barbara Union School District high school:
o San Marcos High School, Santa Barbara High School, and Dos Pueblos High School. No more than 3 members can be from any one High School:
 SMHS (2 openings) ;SBHS (no openings); DPHS (1 openings)  One member must be a student attending a Local Private School or independent studies;  Two members representing the Public at Large; and
 Two members must be students from a local alternative, community, or continuation high school.  Note: Up to 5 new members may be County residents.
 Note: All applicants also fit the category of Public at Large.

Applicants must appear for an interview before the Santa Barbara Youth Council and City Council.

CATEGORY
(Number of
Vacancies) APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd) Notes
Ahtziri Bernal SBHS (City)
Nicholas Gaston LC Jr HS (City)
Luca Flagiello SBHS (City)
Itzel Leon SBHS (City)
Amelia Leonardi LC Jr HS (City)
Public at Large –
City/County (2)
Sophia Mills SBHS (County)
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 20
May 2, 2024

SINGLE FAMILY DESIGN BOARD
 One vacancy.
 Term Expiration: June 30, 2027
 Qualifications/Category: Members must be residents of the County of Santa Barbara and meet one of the following categories:
 Appointee must possess professional qualifications in fields related to architecture, including but not limited to, architecture or landscape architecture, including, but not limited to, building design, structural engineering, industrial design, urban planning, or landscape contracting; or  Appointee must be a Licensed Architect; or
 Appointee must represent the Public at Large.
 Appointees may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government.

CATEGORY
(Number of
Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Cindy Antonucci-Ameen Public at large
Joseph Moticha Licensed Architect
Professional
Qualifications;
Licensed Architect; or
Public at Large (1) Danny Seigle Public at large
*Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 21
May 2, 2024

SISTER CITIES BOARD
 One vacancy.
 Term Expiration: December 31, 2024
 Qualifications/Category: Member may be a resident of the adjoining areas of Santa Barbara County.  Appointees may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government.

CATEGORY
(Number of
Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
William Tyler Head Water Commission Applicant
County Resident (1) Terra Taylor Com Events & Festivals Applicant *Registered voter in the City/County of Santa Barbara
who is a US citizen aged 18 years or older. 22
May 2, 2024

WATER COMMISSION
 One vacancy.
 Term Expiration: December 31, 2027
 Qualifications/Category: Member must be a qualified elector* of the City.  Appointees may not hold any full-time paid office or employment in City government.

CATEGORY
(Number of
Vacancies)

APPLICANT
Incumbent
Appt. Dates
(Years Served)
Applicant’s
Preference
(1st, 2nd, 3rd)
Notes
Lindsay Coony 12/8/2020
(3 years)
Term ended 12/31/2023; continuing to
Qualified elector of the serve until successor is appointed.

City (1) William Tyler Head Sister Cities Board Applicant

Santa Barbara City CouncilMay 7, 2024

Santa Barbara City Council
May 7, 2024