CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
CITY COUNCIL
Randy Rowse
Mayor
Kelly McAdoo
City Administrator
Eric Friedman
Mayor Pro Tempore
Kristen W. Sneddon
Ordinance Committee Chair
Sarah J. Knecht
City Attorney
Eric Friedman
Finance Committee Chair
Oscar Gutierrez
Meagan Harmon
Mike Jordan
Wendy Santamaria
City Hall
735 Anacapa Street
http://www.SantaBarbaraCA.gov
OCTOBER 7, 2025, 2:00 PM
AGENDA
735 ANACAPA STREET, SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA; AND
HIGHLAND RESORT AND SPA, PRIMROSE ROOM, 2ND FLOOR, 5 CHOME-6-1 SHINNISHIHARA, FUJIYOSHIDA, YAMANSHI 403-0017, JAPAN
IN-PERSON PUBLIC COMMENT: At the beginning of each meeting of the City Council, Finance Committee, or Ordinance Committee, any member of the public may address the City Council concerning any item not on the Council's agenda. Any person wishing to make such address should first complete and deliver a "Request to Speak" form prior to the time that public comment is taken up by the City Council. Each speaker will be given a total of 3 minutes to address the Council. Pooling of time is not allowed during general public comment. The time allotted for general public comment at the beginning of the 2:00 p.m. session is 30 minutes.
Any member of the public who did not speak during the 2:00 p.m. session but who submitted a request to do so during the 2:00 p.m. 30 minute session may do so at the end of the meeting when the additional “Public Comment (If Necessary)” is announced. The City Council, upon majority vote, may decline to hear a speaker on the grounds that the subject matter is beyond their jurisdiction.
REMOTE PUBLIC COMMENT: Members of the public wishing to speak must “raise their hand” in the Zoom platform by selecting the virtual hand icon when their item is called. The keyboard shortcut for this is Alt+Y for Windows and Option+Y for Macs. City staff will activate the speaker’s microphone when the speaker’s name is called. The speaker will then need to unmute themselves. The keyboard shortcut for this is Alt+M for Windows or Command-Shift-A for Macs.
HOW TO REMOTELY OBSERVE AND/OR SPEAK LIVE AT A MEETING
• Web: https://santabarbaraca-gov.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_-tbNSuHPTmquCwDEP9hNaQ (Participation via Zoom)
• Telephone: Dial 1-669-900-6833, Enter Webinar ID: 894 0718 1596 (press *9 to raise/lower hand; press *6 to mute/unmute) • Online Streaming: Council meetings are streamed live at www.SantaBarbaraCA.gov/CAP • TV: Each regular City Council meeting is broadcast live in English and Spanish on City TV Channel 18 and rebroadcast in English on Wednesdays and Thursdays at 7:00 p.m. and Saturdays at 8:00 a.m., and in Spanish on Sundays at 3:00 p.m.
Each televised Council meeting is closed captioned for the hearing impaired. Check the City TV program guide at www.santabarbaraca.gov/citytv for rebroadcasts of Finance and Ordinance Committee meetings. (CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE)
WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT: Public comments may also be submitted via email to [email protected] prior to the beginning of the Council Meeting. All public comments submitted via email will be provided to City Council and will become part of the public record.
ORDER OF BUSINESS: Regular meetings of the Finance Committee and the Ordinance Committee begin at 12:00 p.m. The regular City Council meeting begins at 2:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall.
REPORTS: Copies of the reports relating to agenda items are available for review at http://www.SantaBarbaraCA.gov/CAP.In accordance with state law requirements, this agenda generally contains only a brief general description of each item of business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting. Should you wish more detailed information regarding any particular agenda item, you are encouraged to obtain a copy of the Council Agenda Report (a "CAR") online at the City's website (http://www.SantaBarbaraCA.gov/CAP). Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are posted to the City’s website as soon as reasonably feasible.
CONSENT CALENDAR: The Consent Calendar is comprised of items that will not usually require discussion by the City Council. A Consent Calendar item is open for discussion by the City Council upon request of a Councilmember, City staff, or member of the public. Items on the Consent Calendar may be approved by a single motion. Should you wish to comment on an item listed on the Consent Agenda, after turning in your "Request to Speak" form, you should come forward to speak or raise your hand in Zoom at the time the Council considers the Consent Calendar.
LANGUAGE TRANSLATION AND INTERPRETATION: The City of Santa Barbara offers live Spanish translation and interpretation for City Council Meetings via the Wordly platform. Follow the directions below to access the service. • Go to: https://attend.wordly.ai/join/QQBV-6746
o Ensure the Session ID QQBV-6746 is displayed.
o Select “Spanish” and click on the “Attend” button.
o You can now read the captions on your device and/or listen to the translation of the City Council meeting. o Click the speaker button to hear a text-to-speech version of the translated dialogue. • If you have any questions or concerns, please contact City TV at 805-564-5311.
SPANISH INTERPRETATION: If you need interpretation of your communications to Council from Spanish into English, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 564-5309 or by email at [email protected]. If possible, notification of at least 48 hours will usually enable the City to make arrangements.
INTERPRETACIÓN EN ESPAÑOL: Si necesita una interpretación del español al inglés, para sus comunicaciones al Consejo, comuníquese con la Oficina del Secretario Municipal al 564-5309, o por correo electrónico a [email protected]. Si es posible, la notificación de al menos 48 horas generalmente permitirá a la Ciudad hacer los arreglos.
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: If you need auxiliary aids or services or staff assistance to attend or participate in this meeting, please contact the City Administrator's Office at 564-5305 or by email at [email protected]. If possible, notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will usually enable the City to make reasonable arrangements. For those who need accessibility accommodation in using the “raise hand” function and/or registering to participate in the Zoom session, please contact the Clerk’s office by 5:00 p.m. the day before the meeting for assistance. Additionally, a speaker may email [email protected] by 5:00 p.m. the day before a meeting, stating which item they wish to speak on. Specialized services, such as sign language interpretation or documents in Braille, may require additional lead time to arrange. 10/07/2025 Santa Barbara City Council Final Agenda Page 1 OCTOBER 7, 2025 AGENDA
ORDINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING - 12:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER (120.03)
1. Subject: Proposed Amendment to Santa Barbara Municipal Code 17.36.010 to Allow Pay-by-Plate in Waterfront Parking Lots (120.03) Recommendation: That the Ordinance Committee forward to City Council for introduction, An Ordinance of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending the Santa Barbara Municipal Code (SBMC) by Amending Section 17.36.010 to Allow Pay-by-Plate in Waterfront Parking Lots.
10/07/2025 Santa Barbara City Council Final Agenda Page 2 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING - 2:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
CEREMONIAL ITEMS
1. Subject: Employee Recognition – Service Award Pins (120.04) Recommendation: That Council authorize the City Administrator to express the City’s appreciation to employees who are eligible to receive service award pins for their years of service through October 31, 2025.
2. Subject: Fire Prevention Week (120.04)
3. Subject: Hispanic Heritage Month 2025 (120.04)
CHANGES TO THE AGENDA
CONSENT CALENDAR
4. Subject: Minutes (000.00)
Recommendation: That Council waive reading and approve the minutes for the special and regular meetings of September 23, 2025.
5. Subject: Proposed Lease Agreement for 920 State Street with Estrella Emporium LLC, dba Game Seeker [Ordinance Adoption, Agreement] (330.04) Recommendation: That Council adopt, by reading of title only, an Ordinance of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Approving and Authorizing the Deputy City Administrator to Execute a Five-Year Lease Agreement with One, Five-Year Option with Estrella Emporium LLC, Doing Business As Game Seeker of Santa Barbara, for the 1,320 Square Foot Retail Space at 920 State Street Commencing Upon the Effective Date of the Enabling Ordinance.
10/07/2025 Santa Barbara City Council Final Agenda Page 3
6. Subject: Amending Municipal Code Title 10, Section 10.44.152 - Regulation of Parking Upon Municipally Owned and/or Operated Parking Lots [Ordinance Introduction] (550.01)
Recommendation: That Council introduce and subsequently adopt, by reading of title only, an Ordinance of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending Section 10.44.152 of the Santa Barbara Municipal Code Regarding Regulation of Parking Upon Municipally Owned and/or Operated Parking Lots.
7. Subject: Adoption of Resolution Amending the City’s Records Retention Policy and Procedures to Include the Sustainability & Resilience Department’s Records Retention Schedule [Resolution] (160.06) Recommendation: That Council adopt, by reading of title only, a Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending the City of Santa Barbara Records Management Policies and Procedures Manual to Include the Sustainability & Resilience Department’s records retention schedule.
8. Subject: Authorization to Amend the Legal Services Agreement with Richards Watson & Gershon (COSB v. Giordani) [Resolution; Agreement] (540.01)
Recommendation: That Council:
A. Authorize the City Attorney to execute a fourth amendment to the legal services agreement with Richards Watson & Gershon, a professional corporation, relating to litigation to enforce City waterline easements by increasing the agreement not to exceed amount by $25,000 (from $430,000 to $455,000), to be paid from funds appropriated from the Water Resources Department; and
B. Adopt, by reading of title only, a Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending Resolution No. 25-066, Adopting the Budget for Fiscal Year 2026, to Appropriate Funds for the Small Tunnel Air Binding Project.
9. Subject: Fiscal Year 2026 Interim Financial Statements for the One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (250.02)
Recommendation: That Council accept the Fiscal Year 2026 Interim Financial Statements for the one month ended July 31, 2025.
10/07/2025 Santa Barbara City Council Final Agenda Page 4
10. Subject: Fourth Contract Amendment with RRM Design Group for Final Design and Construction Documents for the Dwight Murphy Field Renewal Project [Agreement] (630.02)
Recommendation: That Council authorize the Public Works Director to execute a fourth contract amendment with RRM Design Group in the amount of $87,000 for soils testing and playground safety audits during construction of the Dwight Murphy Field Renewal Project for a new not-to-exceed dollar amount of $1,339,441 for all services.
11. Subject: Replacement Subordination Agreement and Loan Amendment for Housing Authority Project Located at 3055 De La Vina Street [Agreement] (660.04)
Recommendation: That Council authorize the City Administrator to execute a Subordination Agreement with Banc of California with respect to a senior loan in a not-to-exceed amount of $18,000,000 to the Housing Authority for construction of the affordable housing project at 3055 De La Vina Street and an amendment to Loan Agreement to substitute the Banc of California loan as the senior indebtedness under City Loan Agreement No. 28,471, as approved as to form by the City Attorney.
12. Subject: Approval of Mills Act Historic Property Tax Reduction Contracts (610.05)
Recommendation: That Council:
A. Grant exceptions to the Mills Act contract threshold for assessed property valuation, pursuant to Santa Barbara Municipal Code §30.157.145.C.4.m., for the following historic properties:
1. 20 East Los Olivos Street (APN 025-242-004);
2. 18 Calle Alamo (APN 053-332-001);
3. 234 Canon Drive (APN 053-171-006);
B. Grant renewals of the Mills Act contracts for the following historic properties:
1. 212 West Valerio Street (APN 027-091-012);
2. 2012 Anacapa Street (APN 025-321-012); and
C. Authorize the Community Development Director to execute the three new Mills Act historic property contracts and to renew the two existing contracts.
REPORT FROM THE ORDINANCE COMMITTEE
GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
PULLED CONSENT ITEMS
10/07/2025 Santa Barbara City Council Final Agenda Page 5
CITY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE AND ATTORNEY REPORTS
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
13. Subject: Access Advisory Committee - Annual Report (640.03) Recommendation: That Council receive an update on the recent activities and achievements of the Access Advisory Committee.
COUNCIL AND STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
COUNCILMEMBER COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENT REPORTS AND ENGAGEMENTS
PUBLIC COMMENT (IF NECESSARY)
ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
ORDINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING
MEETING AGENDA
DATE: October 7, 2025 Kristen W. Sneddon, Chair
TIME: 12:00 p.m. Oscar Gutierrez
PLACE: Council Chambers Mike Jordan
Office of the City Office of the City
Administrator Attorney
Kelly McAdoo Sarah Knecht
City Administrator City Attorney
Nicole Grisanti
Supervisor, City Administrator’s Office
IN-PERSON PUBLIC COMMENT: Any person wishing to address the Ordinance Committee should first complete and deliver a "Request to Speak" form prior to the time that public comment is taken up by the Committee Member. Each speaker will be given a total of 3 minutes to address the Committee. The Ordinance Committee, upon majority vote, may decline to hear a speaker on the grounds that the subject matter is beyond their jurisdiction.
WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT: Public comments may also be submitted via email to [email protected] prior to the beginning of the Ordinance Committee Meeting. All public comments submitted via email will be provided to the Ordinance Committee and will become part of the public record.
HOW TO REMOTELY OBSERVE AND/OR SPEAK LIVE AT A MEETING:
WEB: https://santabarbaraca-gov.zoom.us/j/83099911799?pwd=N0fwX914FLbpUNNMPr2foEbiub5ovC.1 Passcode: 199458
TELEPHONE: Phone one-tap:
+16699006833,,83099911799# US (San Jose)
+16694449171,,83099911799# US
REPORTS: Copies of the reports relating to agenda items are available for review at http://www.SantaBarbaraCA.gov/CAP.In accordance with state law requirements, this agenda generally contains only a brief general description of each item of business to be transacted or discussed at the meeting. Should you wish more detailed information regarding any particular agenda item, you are encouraged to obtain a copy of the Council Agenda Report (a "CAR") online at the City's website (http://www.SantaBarbaraCA.gov/CAP). Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are posted to the City’s website as soon as reasonably feasible.
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: If you need auxiliary aids or services or staff assistance to attend or participate in this meeting, please contact the City Administrator's Office at 564-5305 or by email at [email protected] if possible, notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting will usually enable the City to make reasonable arrangements. For those who need accessibility accommodation in using the “raise hand” function and/or registering to participate in the Zoom session, please contact the Clerk’s office by 5:00 p.m. the day before the meeting for assistance. Additionally, a speaker may email [email protected] by 5:00 p.m. the day before a meeting, stating which item they wish to speak on. Specialized Services, such as sign language interpretation or documents in Braille, may require additional lead time to arrange.
File Code No. 120.03
ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION
SUBJECT: Proposed Amendment to Santa Barbara Municipal Code 17.36.010 to Allow Pay-by-Plate in Waterfront Parking Lots
RECOMMENDATION: That the Ordinance Committee forward to City Council for introduction, An Ordinance of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending the Santa Barbara Municipal Code (SBMC) by Amending Section 17.36.010 to Allow Pay-byPlate in Waterfront Parking Lots. .
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
ORDINANCE COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: October 7, 2025
TO: Ordinance Committee
FROM: Waterfront Department
SUBJECT: Proposed Amendment to Santa Barbara Municipal Code 17.36.010 to Allow Pay-by-Plate in Waterfront Parking Lots
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Ordinance Committee forward to City Council for introduction, an Ordinance of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending the Santa Barbara Municipal Code (“SBMC”) by Amending Section 17.36.010 to Allow Pay-by-Plate in Waterfront Parking Lots.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Waterfront Department proposes an Amendment to Santa Barbara Municipal Code
17.36.010 to transition from a Pay-and-Display System to a Pay-by-Plate System in Waterfront Parking Lots. The transition is designed to streamline enforcement operations, improve revenue controls, and align with current parking industry practices. The proposed amendment will enable enforcement staff, also referred to as Parking Monitors, to verify parking paid status via License Plate Reader (LPR) technology to improve accuracy, efficiency, and coverage. The proposed plan includes privacy and data governance measures to ensure privacy compliance.
DISCUSSION:
The Waterfront Department operates eight parking lots encompassing approximately 2,580 parking stalls. Two of the parking lots, Stearns Wharf and Harbor Main, are staffed and use revenue control/point of sale systems that operate with ticket dispensers, entry and exit gate arms, and License Plate Reader hardware; technology the Waterfront Department acquired and implemented in 2014. The other six Waterfront Parking Lots operate a Pay-and-Display Parking System, requiring drivers to purchase a time-limited parking session at a nearby pay station and display the receipt on their vehicle’s dashboard. Enforcement relies on manual on-foot verification of displayed receipts.
Agenda Item No. 1
File Code No. 120.03
Ordinance Committee Agenda Report
Proposed Amendment to Santa Barbara Municipal Code 17.36.010 to Allow Pay-by-Plate in Waterfront Parking Lots
October 7, 2025
The proposed Title 17 amendment would allow the Waterfront Department to implement a Pay-by-Plate Parking System, which would incorporate a LPR-based enforcement module, widely used across municipalities to improve enforcement efficiencies, reduce violations, and enhance the customer experience. Under the proposed amendment, upon entry to the parking lot, visitors would be required to enter their vehicle license plate to pay for their parking session at any pay station located inside the parking lot. In addition, this technology would facilitate integration of mobile payment apps, as well as remote payment options.
This transition supports operational efficiency, modernizes parking management, and aligns with best practices for municipal parking operations at State and national levels.
CONCLUSION:
The proposed amendment to transition from a Pay and Display System to a Pay-By-Plate System aims to modernize the Waterfront Parking Operation, enhance enforcement efficiency as well as improve the customer experience when visiting City beaches and adjacent businesses.
ATTACHMENT: Draft Ordinance
PREPARED BY: Cesar Barrios, Waterfront Business Manager SUBMITTED BY: Mike Wiltshire, Waterfront Director
APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
ATTACHMENT
STAFF DRAFT SHOWING
CHANGES FROM CURRENT CODE 10/7/25
1 ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA BARBARA AMENDING THE SANTA
BARBARA MUNICIPAL CODE (“SBMC”) BY
AMENDING SECTION 17.36.010 TO ALLOW PAY-BYPLATE IN WATERFRONT PARKING LOTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 17.36 of Title 17 of the Santa Barbara Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:
17.36.010 Definitions. Parking in Waterfront Parking Lots.
The following words and phrases shall have the meaning indicated, unless the context or usage clearly requires a different meaning:
A. WATERFRONT PARKING LOTS. All parking lots managed and maintained by the Waterfront Department, including Leadbetter Parking Lot, Harbor West Parking Lot, Harbor Parking Lot, Garden Street Parking Lot, Palm Park Parking Lot, Cabrillo West Parking Lot, Cabrillo East Parking Lot and Stearns Wharf.
B. HARBOR PARKING LOT. The Waterfront Parking Lot bounded on the East by West Beach, on the West by Harbor Way, on the North by Shoreline Drive and Cabrillo Boulevard and on the South by Marinas 2, 3, 4 and the small-boat launch ramp.
C. PARKING FEES AND PERMITS. No person shall park a vehicle in the Waterfront Parking Lots without having paid or paying the required parking fee. Parking fees and the permit system for Waterfront Parking Lots shall be established by resolution of the City Council.
ATTACHMENT
STAFF DRAFT SHOWING
CHANGES FROM CURRENT CODE 10/7/25
2 REMOVE:
D. PAY AND DISPLAY PARKING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. When entering Waterfront Parking Lots operated by a Pay and Display Parking Management System, the owner or operator of a vehicle entering the lot must purchase a receipt from a Pay and Display Parking Management System machine in accordance with instructions and requirements posted on the machine. Such receipt shall be prominently displayed on the driver’s side dashboard in such a manner that the date and expiration time of the receipt are readily visible from the exterior of the vehicle. Any owner or operator of a vehicle who fails to purchase or properly display a valid receipt purchased from a Pay and Display Parking Management System machine shall pay a fee as described by City Council resolution.
D. PAY BY PLATE PARKING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. When entering Waterfront Parking Lots operated by a pay by plate parking management system, the owner or operator of a vehicle entering the lot must purchase an hourly parking permit from a Pay by Plate Parking Management System machine in accordance with instructions and requirements posted on the machine. Such hourly parking permit shall be prominently purchased upon arrival. Any owner or operator of a vehicle who fails to purchase a valid hourly parking permit shall pay a violation fee as described by City Council resolution.
E. DUTY AND POWER TO MANAGE. The Waterfront Director shall have the duty and power to manage all uses of Waterfront Parking Lots and may deny issuance of parking permits to any person or entity when such permit or permits would unduly interfere with coastal access or public parking.
(Ord. 5911, 2019; Ord. 5649, 2014; Ord. 4757, 1992)
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: October 7, 2025
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: City Administrator’s Office
SUBJECT: Employee Recognition – Service Award Pins
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council authorize the City Administrator to express the City’s appreciation to employees who are eligible to receive service award pins for their years of service through October 31, 2025.
DISCUSSION:
The City appreciates the loyalty to the community and the dedication to public service that are demonstrated by City employees throughout the organization every day. Since 1980, the City Employees’ Recognition Program has recognized length of City Service. Service award pins are presented to employees for every five years of service. Those employees achieving 25 years of service or more are eligible to receive their pins in front of the City Council.
Attached is a list of those employees who will be awarded pins for their service through October 31, 2025.
ATTACHMENT: October 2025 Service Awards
PREPARED BY: Talhia Dorado, Administrative Specialist
SUBMITTED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
APPROVED BY: City Administrator's Office
Agenda Item No. 1
File Code No. 120.04
ATTACHMENT
OCTOBER 2025 SERVICE AWARDS
October 7, 2025 Council Meeting
5 Years
Jazmin A Lau, Administrative Analyst I, Public Works Department Beth Anna Cornett, Senior Planner I, Public Works Department Raven Rutledge, Administrative Analyst II, Community Development Department Barbara Burkhart, Project Planner, Community Development Department Keith DeMartini, Finance Director, Finance Department
10 Years
Araceli Ibarra, Administrative Specialist, Parks & Recreation Department Pamela Boucher, Parking Enforcement Officer, Police Department Sonja Crawford, Police Officer, Police Department
Jennifer Nichoson, Administrative Assistant, Finance Department 15 Years
Edward Montejano, Maintenance Worker II, City Administrator’s Office 20 Years
Douglas Klug, Police Sergeant, Police Department
Brenda Nielsen, Administrative Clerical Supervisor, Community Development Department 25 Years
Joshua Haggmark, Water Resources Director, Department of Water Resources Agenda Item No. 2
File Code No. 120.04
Agenda Item No. 3
File Code No.
09/23/2025 Santa Barbara City Council Minutes Page 1 of 3
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
SPECIAL MEETING
SEPTEMBER 23, 2025
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 735 ANACAPA STREET
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Randy Rowse called the meeting to order at 10:30 a.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Rowse.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present: Eric Friedman, Meagan Harmon, Mike Jordan, Wendy Santamaria, Kristen W. Sneddon, Mayor Randy Rowse.
Councilmembers absent: Councilmember Oscar Gutierrez.
Staff present: City Administrator Kelly McAdoo, City Attorney Sarah J. Knecht, Deputy City Clerk Austin Taylor.
RECESS
Mayor Rowse recessed to closed session at 10:31 a.m. and stated that no reportable action is anticipated.
Agenda Item No. 4
File Code No. 000.00
09/23/2025 Santa Barbara City Council Minutes Page 2 of 3
CLOSED SESSION
1. Subject: Conference with Labor Negotiator (440.03)
Recommendation: That Council hold a closed session pursuant to the authority of Government Code Section 54957.6 to consider instructions to City Negotiator/Human Resources Director Michael Arnoldus, Assistant City Administrator Rene Eyerly, Assistant City Attorney John Doimas; regarding negotiations with Service Employees’ International Union, Local 620, Treatment and Patrol Bargaining Unit; Service Employees’ International Union, Local 620, Santa Barbara City Employees’ Association (General Bargaining Unit); Fire Management Association; Santa Barbara City Firefighters Association; Police Officers Association; Police Management Association; Santa Barbara City Supervisory Employees; American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees and Unrepresented Managers and Confidential Employees.
Scheduling: Duration, 45 Minutes; anytime
Report: None anticipated
Document:
- September 23, 2025, report from the Human Resources Director.
Time:
- 10:32 a.m. – 11:14 a.m.
Report:
- No report made.
-
City Administrator McAdoo was excused at 11:14 a.m.
09/23/2025 Santa Barbara City Council Minutes Page 3 of 3
2. Subject: Public Employee Performance Evaluation – Government Code Section 54957 (b)(1) (170.01)
Recommendation: That Council hold a closed session for a Public Employee Performance Evaluation per Government Code Section 54957 (b) (1).
Title: City Administrator
Scheduling: Duration, 30 minutes; anytime
Report: None anticipated
Document:
- September 23, 2025, report from the City Administrator.
Time:
- 11:15 a.m. – 11:46 a.m.
Report:
- No report made
PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS LISTED ON THE AGENDA
No one wished to speak.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Rowse adjourned the meeting at 11:47 a.m.
Approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Barbara on October 7, 2025.
SANTA BARBARA CITY COUNCIL SANTA BARBARA
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
_______________________________ ATTEST: ______________________________
RANDY ROWSE SARAH GORMAN
MAYOR CITY CLERK SERVICES MANAGER
09/23/2025 Santa Barbara City Council Minutes Page 1 of 5
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING
SEPTEMBER 23, 2025
COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 735 ANACAPA STREET
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Randy Rowse called the meeting to order at 2:01 p.m. (The Finance Committee and Ordinance Committee, which normally meet at 12:00 p.m., did not meet this day).
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Rowse.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present: Eric Friedman, Meagan Harmon, Mike Jordan, Wendy Santamaria, Kristen W. Sneddon, Mayor Randy Rowse.
Councilmembers absent: Councilmember Oscar Gutierrez.
Staff present: City Administrator Kelly McAdoo, City Attorney Sarah J. Knecht, Deputy City Clerk Austin Taylor.
CHANGES TO THE AGENDA
There were no changes to the agenda.
CONSENT CALENDAR (Item Nos. 1-3)
The titles of the Ordinances and Resolutions were read.
Motion:
Councilmembers Friedman/ Santamaria to approve the consent calendar as recommended.
Vote:
Unanimous roll call vote (Absent: Councilmember Gutierrez). 09/23/2025 Santa Barbara City Council Minutes Page 2 of 5
1. Subject: Minutes (000.00)
Recommendation: That Council waive reading and approve the minutes for the special and regular meetings of September 9, 2025.
Action: Approved the recommendation.
2. Subject: 2025-2027 Fire Management Association Bargaining Unit Memorandum of Understanding and Amendment of Resolution No. 25-071, the Position and Salary Control Resolution for Fiscal Year 2026 [Resolution; Agreement] (440.02)
Recommendation: That Council:
A. Adopt, by reading of title only, a Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Adopting the 2025-2027 Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Santa Barbara and the Santa Barbara Fire Management Association; and
B. Adopt, by reading of title only, a Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending Resolution No. 25-071, the Position and Salary Control Resolution for Fiscal Year 2026, Affecting the Salaries of Certain Classifications in the Fire Management Association Effective September 23, 2025.
Action: Approved the recommendation; Resolution Nos. 25-104, 25-105; Agreement No. 28,788 (September 23, 2025, report from the Human Resources Director).
3. Subject: Contract Amendment for Design Support Extra Services for the Cater Water Treatment Plant Reservoir Resiliency Project [Agreement] (540.1)
Recommendation: That Council authorize the Public Works Director to execute the Second Contract Amendment with Carollo Engineers Inc., for design services for the Cater Water Treatment Plant Reservoir Resiliency Project, Contract No. 26,976, in the amount of $208,468, for a total expenditure authority of $1,546,974.
Action: Approved the recommendation; Agreement No. 28,789 (September 23,2025, report from the Water Resources Director).
GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the Public: Jeff Shaffer, Joy Sturges, Byranie Thomas. 09/23/2025 Santa Barbara City Council Minutes Page 3 of 5
PULLED CONSENT ITEMS
None.
CITY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATIVE AND ATTORNEY REPORTS
QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING RULES APPLY TO THE FOLLOWING AGENDA ITEM
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC HEARING
4. Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission’s Approval of the 633 East Cabrillo Boulevard Hotel Expansion Project [Resolution] (640.07) Recommendation: That Council:
A. Consider and deny the appeal filed by the Law Office of Jordan R. Sisson, on behalf of UNITE HERE Local 11, of Planning Commission’s Approval of the 633 E. Cabrillo Blvd. Hotel Expansion Project; and
B. Adopt, by reading of title only, a Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Denying the Appeal of the Law Office of Jordan R. Sisson, on Behalf of UNITE HERE Local 11, and Upholding the Decision of the Planning Commission to Approve the Project at 633 E. Cabrillo Blvd.
Mayor Rowse opened the public hearing at 2:12 p.m.
Ex parte disclosures:
- Councilmember Sneddon disclosed that she had a meeting with the appellants regarding what is already in the documents.
- Councilmember Harmon spoke to Unite Here Local 11 on the phone to say she does not take ex parte communications regarding City Council appeal matters.
- Councilmember Santamaria spoke to Unite Here Local 11 regarding what is already in the documents.
- Mayor Pro Tem Friedman received an email from Appellant requesting to meet, to whom he stated he doesn’t take ex parte communications regarding City Council appeal matters.
- Councilmember Jordan declined to speak to either side. - Mayor Rowse disclosed that he is familiar with the Parker family and was part of the Council in 2016 when this was last heard.
No other ex parte communications were disclosed.
09/23/2025 Santa Barbara City Council Minutes Page 4 of 5 Documents:
- September 23, 2025, report from the Interim Community Development Director.
- PowerPoint presentation prepared and presented by staff. - Proposed Resolution.
Speakers:
- Staff: Project Planner Kathleen Kennedy, Assistant City Attorney Tava Ostrenger.
- Appellant: Jordan R. Sisson.
- Applicant: Clay Aurell, Cameron Goodman, Eli Parker
- Planning Commission: Commissioner Lucille Boss.
- Historic Landmark Commission: Commissioner Anthony Grumbine. - Members of the public: Andrew Seymour, Matt Richards, Frank Bautista, Brenda Romero, Bridget Day.
Councilmembers’ questions were answered.
Motion:
Councilmembers Jordan/ Harmon to approve the recommendations as made by staff, with the removal of the site visit from the Proposed Resolution recitals, as requested by the City Attorney.
Vote:
Unanimous roll call vote (Absent: Councilmember Gutierrez).
Mayor Rowse closed the public hearing at 4:09 p.m.
COUNCIL AND STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
COUNCILMEMBER COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENT REPORTS & ENGAGEMENTS -Councilmember Friedman attended the following meetings or events: 1. BEACON; 2.
Sustainability Committee; 3. Tails of Hope; 4. National Rehabilitation Week; 5.
Children’s Library 10th Anniversary; 6. Planned Parenthood 51st Annual Book Sale. -Councilmember Sneddon attended the following meetings or events: 1. Sustainability Committee; 2. Creek Week Kickoff; 3. Coastal Cities League of Cities Legislative Update; 4. Cachuma Release Board Meeting; 5. Children’s Library 10th Anniversary; 6.
Sun Day Celebration; 7. Local UN Peace Prize Proclamation; 8. Cachuma Operation and Management Meeting.
PUBLIC COMMENT (IF NECESSARY)
No one wished to speak.
09/23/2025 Santa Barbara City Council Minutes Page 5 of 5
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Rowse adjourned the meeting at 4:14 p.m.
Approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Barbara on October 7, 2025.
SANTA BARBARA CITY COUNCIL SANTA BARBARA
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
_______________________________ ATTEST: ______________________________
RANDY ROWSE SARAH GORMAN
MAYOR CITY CLERK SERVICES MANAGER
1 ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
BARBARA APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE DEPUTY
CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE A FIVE-YEAR LEASE
AGREEMENT WITH ONE, FIVE-YEAR OPTION WITH
ESTRELLA EMPORIUM LLC, DOING BUSINESS AS GAME
SEEKER OF SANTA BARBARA, FOR THE 1320 SQUARE
FOOT RETAIL SPACE AT 920 STATE STREET COMMENCING
UPON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE ENABLING
ORDINANCE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. In accordance with the provisions of Section 521 of the Charter of the City of Santa Barbara, the agreement for a five-year lease with one, five-year option with Estrella Emporium LLC, doing business as Game Seeker of Santa Barbara, for 1200 square feet of retail space located at 920 State Street, commencing upon the effective date of the enabling ordinance, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk, is hereby approved.
Agenda Item No. 5
File Code No. 330.04
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: October 7, 2025
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: City Administrator’s Office
SUBJECT: Amending Municipal Code Title 10, Section 10.44.152 - Regulation of Parking Upon Municipally Owned and/or Operated Parking Lots [Ordinance Introduction]
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council introduce and subsequently adopt, by reading of title only, an Ordinance of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending Section 10.44.152 of the Santa Barbara Municipal Code Regarding Regulation of Parking Upon Municipally Owned and/or Operated Parking Lots.
DISCUSSION:
Staff recommend amending Santa Barbara Municipal Code (SBMC) Title 10, Section
10.44.152, titled “Regulation of Parking Upon Municipally Owned and/or Operated Parking Lots,” to allow for the use of new parking payment technologies and systems in City of Santa Barbara (City) Downtown Parking Lots, such as self-service payment kiosks.
The requested changes eliminate inflexible language specifying that fees must be paid prior to exiting a parking lot to either an attendant or by mail, and adds language allowing the City Administrator to determine which payment methods, processes, and enforcement procedures may be accepted at each parking facility. This change provides the City with the ability to implement a variety of modern payment systems at Downtown Parking lots to enhance customer experience and improve parking operations without having to amend the ordinance each time.
These changes will enable the City’s Downtown Parking Lots to implement a pay-on-foot system, similar to the system used in the Waterfront parking lots, in the Helena Lot located in the Funk Zone. This pilot project will enable the City to experiment with new revenue control models that could inform future investments in parking technology. Additionally, these changes allows for changes in the timing of payment that make enforcement of this pay-on-foot system feasible.
Agenda Item No. 6
File Code No. 550.01
Council Agenda Report
Amending Municipal Code Title 10, Section 10.44.152 - Regulation of Parking Upon Municipally Owned and/or Operated Parking Lots [Ordinance Introduction] October 7, 2025
Ordinance Committee
The proposed changes were reviewed by Ordinance Committee on September 9, 2025.
The Committee voted 2-1 to forward staff’s recommendation to City Council, with the following comments:
Look at the administrative process, possibly changing authority from the Public Works Director to the City Administrator.
Response: Language in 10.44.152 has been updated to give authority to determine which payment methods are accepted at each municipal parking facility, establish procedures for payment processing and enforcement, and modify or expand authorized payment methods in municipally owned or operated parking lots. Clarify that street parking is excluded.
Response: This ordinance applies only to parking in municipally owned or operated parking lots. Street parking is excluded. The proposed changes would not enable implementation of priced street parking without further Council action. Any implementation of paid street parking would require Council to adopt fees and approve the purchase of equipment.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
This change will allow the pilot of pay-on-foot parking in the Helena Parking Lot. The ability to receive payment for parking in this lot is estimated to bring in $75,000 annually.
The success of the pilot payment system demonstrates the potential to implement the self-service payment model in other Downtown Parking surface parking lots to reduce operating costs and enhance the customer’s experience.
At their meeting of September 9, 2025, the Ordinance Committee voted 2/1 to forward to Council for approval.
PREPARED AND
SUBMITTED BY: Sarah Clark, Downtown Team Manager/EF/nv
APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
COUNCIL INTRODUCTION DRAFT 09/16/25
SHOWING CHANGES FROM CURRENT CODE
1 ORDINANCE NO. _____
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA BARBARA AMENDING SECTION 10.44.152 OF
THE SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING
REGULATION OF PARKING UPON MUNICIPALLY OWNED
AND/OR OPERATED PARKING LOTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 10.44.152 of Chapter 10.44 of Title 10 of the Santa Barbara Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:
10.44.152 Regulation of Parking Upon Municipally Owned and/or Operated Parking Lots.
A. No person shall park a motor vehicle in a municipally owned and/or operated parking lot and fail to pay the parking fee established by resolution and posted for the use of said lot. Said fee shall be paid no later than time of departure from the lot, except that a person departing a lot with no parking attendant present shall deposit said fee or mail said fee in accordance with the instructions on the envelope securely attached to the vehicle by the parking attendant before his or her departure from the lot; said fee to be mailed or delivered within three days.
1. The City Administrator shall have the authority to determine which payment methods are accepted at each municipal parking facility; Establish procedures for payment processing and enforcement; Modify or expand authorized payment methods based on operational needs or technological advancements.
COUNCIL INTRODUCTION DRAFT 09/16/25
SHOWING CHANGES FROM CURRENT CODE
2 2. Failure to pay the required parking fee using an authorized method shall constitute a violation of this Ordinance and may result in the issuance of a parking citation, vehicle immobilization, or towing in accordance with this Code.
3. Use of a City lot is a privilege; therefore, the City reserves the right to revoke this privilege at any time because of inappropriate behavior, violation of any regulation in this Ordinance or misuse of parking facilities. The City reserves the right to establish what inappropriate behaviors are and the misuse of its property.
B. It is unlawful for any person to use or permit or cause a monthly parking permit to be used by a person not authorized in the permit agreement.
C. Any person removing a vehicle from the lot and re-entering a lot for the sole purpose of avoiding payment of parking fees shall pay a parking fee as if said vehicle had not departed the lot.
D. It is unlawful to present subsequent, counterfeit, or other substitute evidence of entry into any municipally owned and/or operated parking lot for the purpose of reducing or avoiding the parking fee established for the use of said lot.
E. In an action for violation of this Section, proof that a person was the registered owner of a motor vehicle at the time the vehicle was parked unattended in a municipally owned and/or operated lot is prima facie evidence that the registered owner was the person who parked the vehicle. The registered owner shall be given written notice of the violation and an opportunity to respond as provided in Section 40202 of the Vehicle Code of the State of California as it exists today and may be amended in the future.
COUNCIL INTRODUCTION DRAFT 09/16/25
SHOWING CHANGES FROM CURRENT CODE
3 F. In addition to the penalties provided for violation of this Code, the use of a municipally owned and/or operated parking lot in violation of the regulations established by the Transportation Engineer, or the applicable fee requirements, shall be subject to use fees that are twice the fees for proper use.
G. The Transportation Engineer shall make provisions to mark, chalk, photograph, record or otherwise identify such use of municipally owned and/or operated parking lots as may be required for the reasonable enforcement of this Chapter.
H. No person who owns, or has possession, custody or control of any vehicle shall park, stop or leave the vehicle more than a period of 72 consecutive hours in a municipally owned parking lot.
I. Notwithstanding Subsection H above, the Public Works Director may issue a permit allowing parking more than 72 consecutive hours in a municipally owned parking lot.
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: October 7, 2025
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Sustainability & Resilience Department
SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution Amending the City’s Records Retention Policy and Procedures to Include the Sustainability & Resilience Department’s Records Retention Schedule [Resolution]
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council adopt, by reading of title only, a Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending the City of Santa Barbara Records Management Policies and Procedures Manual to Include the Sustainability & Resilience Department’s Records Retention Schedule.
DISCUSSION:
Council adopted Resolution No. 25-076 on July 29, 2025, approving an update of the City of Santa Barbara Records Retention Policy and Procedures Manual (Manual). The Manual contains the records retention and disposition schedules for all City departments.
The schedules are a comprehensive listing of records created or maintained by the City, the length of time each record should be retained, and the legal retention authority. If no legal retention authority is cited, the retention period is based on standard records management practice.
The Sustainability & Resilience Department’s (S&R Department) records retention schedule has to date been housed within other department’s schedules due to multiple S&R Department divisions previously existing under other City departments. The S&R Department has now completed an exhaustive review of records held by the department and proposes updates to its record management system. The proposed resolution will allow the S&R Department to manage its own records retention policy notwithstanding any contrary general provisions of the Records Management Policies and Procedures Manual.
The Sustainability & Resilience Department coordinated the proposed amendments with the City Clerk and City Attorney’s Office. The retention periods are consistent with best record management practice and applicable law. Further, by adoption of the proposed resolution, the Council will be authorizing retention and destruction of records in Agenda Item No. 7
File Code No. 160.06
Council Agenda Report
Adoption of Resolution Amending the City’s Records Retention Policy and Procedures to Include the Sustainability & Resilience Department’s Records Retention Schedule [Resolution]
October 7, 2025
accordance with the City’s records retention policy adopted by City Council without further Council authorization. Instead, Department records may be destroyed upon approval of the Sustainability & Resilience Director, City Attorney, and City Clerk.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
This action does not have a budget or financial impact on the City.
PREPARED BY: Stephanie Lopez Lozano, Administrative Assistant SUBMITTED BY: Alelia Parenteau, Sustainability & Resilience Director APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
RESOLUTION NO. _____
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA BARBARA AMENDING THE CITY OF SANTA
BARBARA RECORDS MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND
PROCEDURES MANUAL TO INCLUDE THE
SUSTAINABILITY & RESILIENCE DEPARTMENT’S
RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
1. The Council adopted the City of Santa Barbara Records Management Policies and Procedures Manual by Resolution No. 25-076. The Sustainability & Resilience Department, in coordination with the City Attorney and City Clerk, has completed a comprehensive review of the record management policies and procedures applicable to that department and the Sustainability & Resilience Director has recommended the creation of its own records management practices in light of the creation of the Department.
2. The amendments proposed by the Sustainability & Resilience Director have been reviewed and approved by the City Clerk and City Attorney.
3. This resolution is adopted pursuant to Government Code §§ 34090 and 34090.5 and the City’s powers with respect to municipal affair under City Charter § 400.
4. The City of Santa Barbara Records Management Policies and Procedures Manual is amended by the inclusion of the policies and procedures pertaining to the Sustainability & Resilience Department set forth in Exhibit A to this resolution.
Records of the Sustainability & Resilience Department shall be managed according to Exhibit A notwithstanding any contrary general provisions of the Records Management Policies and Procedures Manual. Records of the Sustainability & Resilience Department may be destroyed as provided in Exhibit A, provided, however, that no record, except a duplicate record, may be destroyed except upon the approval of the Sustainability & Resilience Director, City Clerk, and City Attorney.
5. This resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
EXHIBIT A
SUSTAINABILITY & RESILIENCE DEPARTMENT RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the record copy of all records listed in this records schedule is located in the Sustainability & Resilience Office. If no other instructions exist, copies other than the record copy may be treated as duplicates and discarded when obsolete or no longer needed for reference. The Sustainability & Resilience Director may authorize record copies to be kept in a secure electronic format and may authorize other records to be kept in an electronic format appropriate for the needs of the department. When a record is kept in an electronic format, paper duplicates of the records may be destroyed upon approval of the Sustainability & Resilience Director so long as the electronic record is retained.
Retention and disposition instructions for records commonly found in most City offices, including routine administrative and housekeeping records are listed in a separate schedule entitled “Records Common to Most Offices.” If no legal retention authority is cited, retention period is based on standard records management practice.
No. Division Record Category Description Example Retention
01. Admin Sustainability Council Agendas and Minutes Permanent Committee Files
Records and information
documenting the activities of
the Sustainability Council
Committee
Public Comment
Correspondence
Staff reports
Presentations
3 Years
02. Admin Policies and
Procedures
All final products related to the
internal policies and
procedures of the
Sustainability & Resilience
department
Guidelines
Policies
Procedures
Handbooks
Programs
Records Retention Schedule
Active until
revised
03. Admin Grant Files Files related to grants awarded
and accepted by the
Sustainability & Resilience
Department
Agreements
Financial and Programmatic
Files
Invoices
Purchase orders
Administration records
Applications
Proposals
While Active +
5 years
04. Community
Engagement
Marketing Subject Files Files that contain publicity
material and final product
samples of outreach projects
Program guides
Newsletters
Advertisements
Branding
While Active +
External: 7
years
Internal: 2
Years
05. Community
Engagement
Code Enforcement Files that contain information
related to water quality,
SWMP, illegal dumping, and
encampment enforcement
Correspondence
NOVs
Photographs
Final Decisions
While active +
2 Years
06. Clean
Community
Environmental
Compliance
Files that document
maintenance projects and
remedial activities
Leaking Underground Fuel
Tank (LUFT)
Site mitigation Unit (SMU)
Assessments
While active +
2 Years
07. Clean
Community
Environmental
Programs
Project Files related to
hazardous materials
contamination and cleanup
Solid Waste Complaints and
Response
Vector Control
Permits
While active +
2 Years
08. Clean
Community
Policies and
Procedures
All final products related to
policies and procedures
created and implemented by
the Clean Community Division
Guidelines
Policies
Procedures
Handbooks
Programs
While Active
until revised
09. Clean
Community
Waste Management Files that contain information
related to the City’s solid waste
utility service
Solid Waste Rates
Waste Management Contracts
Studies/Assessments
While Active +
5 Years
10. Clean
Community
Infrastructure Files related to the placement
and maintenance of public
containers, waste processing
facilities, etc.
Maps
Inventory
While Active
until revised
11. Energy and
Climate
SBCE Files that contain information
related to the formation and
sustainment of Santa Barbara
Clean Energy
Policies
Programs
Contracts
Rate Sheets
Rebates
While Active +
6 years
12. Energy and
Climate
Climate Action Plan Files that contain information
related to the Climate Action
Plan
CAP
Technical Reports
Programs
Policies
Working Files
While Active
until revised
13. Energy and
Climate
Policies and
Procedures
All final products related to
policies and procedures
created and implemented by
the Energy and Climate
Division
Guidelines
Policies
Procedures
Handbooks
Programs
While Active
until revised
14. Energy and
Climate
Infrastructure Files related to placement and
maintenance of bike parking,
solar and energy storage
projects, EV charging stations,
streetlights, and street light
circuits
Maps
Inventory
While Active
until revised
15. Adaptation &
Resilience
Project/Subject Files General or special projects not
covered in a more specific
process
Deliverables
Checklists
Estimates
Notes
Correspondence
Schedules
Working Files
Project
Completion +2
years
16. Adaptation &
Resilience
Policies and
Procedures
All final products related to
policies and procedures
created and implemented by
the Adaptation & Resilience
Division
Guidelines
Policies
Procedures
Handbooks
Programs
While Active
until revised
17. Creeks Creeks Advisory Records and information Agendas and Minutes Permanent Committee Files documenting the activities of
the Creeks Advisory
Committee
Public Comment
Correspondence
Staff reports
Presentations
3 Years
18. Creeks Deeds and Easements Recorded deeds and
easements for property
transaction in the City of Santa
Barbara
Deeds
Easements
Permanent
19. Creeks Project/Subject Files General or special projects not covered in a more specific
process
Deliverables
Checklists
Estimates
Notes
Correspondence
Schedules
Working Files
GIS Files
Project
Completion +2
years
20. Creeks Capital Improvement
Projects
Files related to construction
plans and drawings for Creek’s
capital improvement projects
Plans
Drawings
Bids
Scope of Work
Maps
Photographs
Technical reports
Permanent
21. Creeks Water Quality Records documenting water
quality monitoring and
research
Reports
Programs and Projects
Memos
Test Results/Data
Photos
Correspondence
Working Files
Permanent
22. Creeks Policies and
Procedures
All final products related to
policies and procedures
created and implemented by
the Creeks Division
Guidelines
Policies
Procedures
Handbooks
While Active
until revised
Programs
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: October 7, 2025
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: City Attorney’s Office
SUBJECT: Authorization to Amend the Legal Services Agreement with Richards Watson & Gershon (COSB v. Giordani) [Resolution; Agreement] RECOMMENDATION: That Council:
A. Authorize the City Attorney to execute a fourth amendment to the legal services agreement with Richards Watson & Gershon, a professional corporation, relating to litigation to enforce City waterline easements by increasing the agreement not to exceed amount by $25,000 (from $430,000 to $455,000), to be paid from funds appropriated from the Water Resources Department; and
B. Adopt, by reading of title only, a Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Amending Resolution No. 25-066, Adopting the Budget for Fiscal Year 2026, to Appropriate Funds for the Small Tunnel Air Binding Project.
DISCUSSION:
In September 2022, the City entered into an agreement with Richards Watson & Gershon for legal advice and representation with respect to litigation to enforce the City’s waterline easements. Expenditures on the contract are anticipated to exceed the current contract amount of $430,000 due to the protracted litigation. Increasing the contract amount by an additional $25,000 is necessary due to the litigation costs and to avoid an interruption of service.
BUDGETARY IMPACTS:
The cost for legal support and related costs for this case will be paid by appropriating $25,000 of reserve funds that exist in the Water Capital Fund in Fiscal Year 2026.
PREPARED AND
SUBMITTED BY: Daniel S. Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
Agenda Item No. 8
File Code No. 540.01
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA BARBARA AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 25-066,
ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026, TO
APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR THE SMALL TUNNEL AIR
BINDING PROJECT
WHEREAS, in accordance with the City Charter, the City Administrator filed with the Council a proposed budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2025; and WHEREAS, the City Council is required to adopt a budget before the beginning of the fiscal year on July 1, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City Charter provides that at any public meeting after the adoption of the budget, the City Council may amend or supplement the budget by motion adopted by the affirmative votes of at least a majority of the total members of the City Council; and WHEREAS, as authorized by Resolution No. 25-066, this Resolution approves the amendment to the budget as provided herein.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA THAT:
In accordance with the provisions of Section 1205 of the City Charter, the budget for the Fiscal Year 2026, as adopted by Resolution No. 25-066, is hereby amended as follows:
The Council approves appropriating available reserve funds that exist in the Water Capital Fund in the amount of $25,000 to fund the outside counsel contract with Richards Watson Gershon regarding litigation involving City easement work on the Small Tunnel Air Binding project.
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: October 7, 2025
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Finance Department
SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2026 Interim Financial Statements for the One Month Ended July 31, 2025
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council accept the Fiscal Year 2026 Interim Financial Statements for the one month ended July 31, 2025.
DISCUSSION:
The interim financial statements for the one month ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of the fiscal year) are attached. The interim financial statements include budgetary activity in comparison to actual activity for the General Fund, Enterprise Funds, Internal Service Funds, and select Special Revenue Funds.
ATTACHMENT: Interim Financial Statements for the One Month Ended July 31, 2025
PREPARED BY: Nathalie Lecolley, Controller
SUBMITTED BY: Keith DeMartini, Finance Director
APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
Agenda Item No. 9
File Code No. 250.02
ATTACHMENT 1
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with %of Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
GENERAL FUND (pages 3-7)
Revenue 208,664,394 12, 208,664,394 - 390,459 5.9% 9, 196,273,935 963,237 Expenditures 210,270,440 20, 213,352,089 6, 382,514 656,978 12.7% 16, 186,312,596 945,774 Addition to / (use of) reserves (4, (1,606,046) (7, 687,695) (6, 992,055) 9, 656,978) (6, 961,338 982,537) MEASURE C (pages 3-7)
Included in GF summary
Revenue 34,235,000 34, 2, 235,000 - 761,883 31, 8.1% - 473,117 Expenditures 35,119,802 75, 034,819 - 478,007 74, 0.6% 2, 556,812 849,954 Addition to / (use of) reserves (40, (884,802) 2, 799,819) - 283,875 (2, 849,954) SOLID WASTE FUND (page 9)
Revenue 42,990,702 42, 3, 990,702 - 667,416 39, 8.5% 3, 323,286 244,693 Expenditures 42,373,212 42, 1, 937,966 21, 523,544 20, 007,392 52.5% 1, 407,031 429,129 Addition to / (use of) reserves 52,736 617,491 2, (21, 143,872 18, 007,392) 1, 916,256 815,564 WATER OPERATING FUND (page 10)
Revenue 86,755,946 86, 6, 755,946 - 775,236 79, 7.8% 5, 980,710 535,325 Expenditures 89,330,512 93, 4, 839,839 6, 772,101 82, 270,489 11.8% 6, 797,249 009,509 Addition to / (use of) reserves (7, (2,574,566) 2, 083,893) (6, 003,135 (2, 270,489) ( 816,539) 474,184) WASTEWATER OPERATING FUND (page 11)
Revenue 34,492,415 34, 2, 492,415 - 780,543 31, 8.1% 2, 711,872 548,631 Expenditures 37,164,550 38, 2, 652,597 3, 547,729 32, 219,730 14.9% 2, 885,137 201,344 Addition to / (use of) reserves (4, (2,672,135) 160,182) (3, 232,813 (1, 219,730) 173,265) 347,288 DOWNTOWN PARKING FUND (page 12)
Revenue 10,239,915 10, 239,915 - 945,517 9, 9.2% 294,398 944,226 Expenditures 10,292,863 10, 507,339 723,470 9, 619,759 12.8% 164,111 771,479 Addition to / (use of) reserves ( (52,948) 267,424) ( 222,047 619,759) 130,287 172,747 AIRPORT OPERATING FUND (page 13)
Revenue 35,563,735 35, 2, 563,735 - 145,716 33, 6.0% 2, 418,019 361,807 Expenditures 41,945,246 43, 2, 537,142 2, 738,426 38, 568,564 12.2% 1, 230,152 869,686 Addition to / (use of) reserves (7, (6,381,511) ( 973,407) (2, 592,710) (4, 568,564) 812,133) 492,121 GOLF COURSE FUND (page 14)
Revenue 5,267,832 5, 267,832 - 543,248 4, 10.3% 724,584 463,165 Expenditures 5,741,937 5, 741,937 - 269,025 5, 4.7% 472,912 170,122 Addition to / (use of) reserves ( (474,105) 474,105) - 274,224 ( 748,328) 293,043 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FUND (page 15)
Revenue 8,285,099 8, 285,099 - 678,737 7, 8.2% 606,361 595,330 Expenditures 7,844,685 7, 948,134 1, 463,531 6, 104,767 19.7% 379,837 474,665 Addition to / (use of) reserves 440,414 336,964 (1, 215,206 1, 104,767) 226,524 120,664
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
Summary by Fund
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with %of Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
Summary by Fund
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year) FLEET REPLACEMENT FUND (page 16)
Revenue 7,517,447 7, 517,447 - 562,344 6, 7.5% 955,103 606,133 Expenditures 5,225,193 10, 23,013 323,822 1, 9, 145,170 11.3% 16,535 155,639 Addition to / (use of) reserves (2, 2,292,254 806,375) (1, 539,330 (2, 145,170) 200,535) 589,598 FLEET MAINTENANCE FUND (page 17)
Revenue 4,174,813 4, 174,813 - 343,246 3, 8.2% 831,567 293,256 Expenditures 4,023,444 4, 034,363 264,650 3, 515,736 19.3% 253,977 272,011 Addition to / (use of) reserves 151,369 78,596 140,450 ( 515,736) 21,244 577,590 SELF INSURANCE TRUST FUND (page 18)
Revenue 25,414,322 25, 2, 414,322 - 085,349 23, 8.2% 1, 328,973 701,257 Expenditures 24,784,085 24, 1, 997,281 042,552 23, 543,117 6.3% 411,612 934,499 Addition to / (use of) reserves 630,237 1, 417,041 ( 042,797 (82, 543,117) 640) 766,758 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND (page 19)
Revenue 10,602,324 10, 602,324 - 861,080 9, 8.1% 741,244 756,629 Expenditures 9,936,222 9, 1, 961,465 393,422 8, 419,188 18.2% 148,855 978,369 Addition to / (use of) reserves 666,102 ( 640,859 ( 532,342) 1, 419,188) ( 592,389 221,740) WATERFRONT OPERATING FUND (page 20)
Revenue 20,788,855 20, 1, 788,855 - 922,270 18, 9.2% 1, 866,585 730,993 Expenditures 22,732,468 22, 2, 937,514 1, 323,237 19, 214,496 15.4% 2, 399,782 130,739 Addition to / (use of) reserves (2, (1,943,613) ( 148,659) (1, 400,967) ( 214,496) ( 533,197) 399,746) SANTA BARBARA CLEAN ENERGY FUND (page 21)
Revenue 47,843,217 47, 60,188 843,217 - 47, 0.1% 70,625 783,029 Expenditures 50,573,418 54, 4, 053,107 4, 893,243 44, 943,133 18.2% 1, 216,731 773,458 Addition to / (use of) reserves (6, (2,730,201) (4, 209,890) (4, 833,055) 3, 943,133) (1, 566,298 702,833) ENERGY AND CLIMATE MANAGEMENT FUND (page 22)
Revenue 2,288,786 2, 288,786 - 188,770 2, 8.2% 100,016 185,005 Expenditures 2,313,378 2, 19,382 607,247 2, 117,359 5.2% 42,643 470,507 Addition to / (use of) reserves ( (24,592) 318,461) ( 169,388 ( 117,359) 370,490) 142,363
TOTAL FOR ALL FUNDS
Revenue 550,889,802 35, 550,889,802 - 950,119 6.5% 31, 514,939,683 000,312 Expenditures 564,551,652 43, 585,431,845 50, 379,840 345,878 16.0% 36, 491,706,127 019,961 Addition to / (use of) reserves (34, (13,661,850) (7, 542,044) (50, 429,721) 23, 345,878) (5, 233,556 019,650) ** It is City policy to adopt a balanced budget. In most cases, encumbrance balances exist at year-end. These encumbrance balances are obligations of each fund and must be reported at the beginning of each fiscal year. In addition, a corresponding appropriations entry must be made in order to accommodate the 'carried-over' encumbrance amount. Most differences between budgeted annual revenues and expenses are due to these encumbrance carryovers.
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Balance with Percent Previous Change Over Budget Budget Actual Revised budget Received YTD Prior Year TAXES
Sales and Use 31,960,000 31, 2, 960,000 29, 677,596 8.4% 2, 282,404 7.0% 502,959 Measure C Sales Tax 34,235,000 34, 2, 235,000 31, 761,883 8.1% - 473,117 0.0% Measure I Sales Tax 15, 15, 100,000 - 100,000 15, 0.0% - 100,000 0.0% Property Taxes 53,581,500 53, - 581,500 53, 0.0% - 581,500 0.0% Utility Users Tax 8, 8, 200,000 200,000 7, 789,508 9.6% 410,492 48.2% 532,627 Transient Occupancy Tax 29,561,000 29, 2, 561,000 26, 825,912 9.6% 2, 735,088 1.9% 773,812 Business License 2,958,000 2, 33,691 958,000 2, 1.1% 29,638 924,309 13.7% Cannabis Excise Tax 1,000,000 1, 80,781 000,000 8.1% 50,876 919,219 58.8% Real Property Transfer Tax 1,000,000 1, 59,118 000,000 5.9% 63,917 940,882 -7.5% Total Tax Revenues 177,595,500 9, 177,595,500 228,488 5.2% 5, 168,367,012 55.0% 953,830
LICENSES & PERMITS
Licenses & Permits 239,725 18,460 239,725 7.7% 27,198 221,265 -32.1% Total 239,725 18,460 239,725 7.7% 27,198 221,265 -32.1%
FINES & FORFEITURES
Police 2,900,252 2, 900,252 2, 310,153 10.7% 34,900 590,099 788.7% Other Fines & Forfeitures 505,400 40,562 505,400 8.0% 60,980 464,838 -33.5% Total 3, 3,405,652 405,652 3, 350,714 10.3% 95,880 054,938 265.8%
USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
Investment Income 2, 2, 497,391 497,391 2, 333,944 13.4% 163,446 35.3% 246,852 Rents & Concessions 1,615,325 1, 615,325 1, 109,517 6.8% 1,559 505,808 6924.0% Total 4, 4,112,716 112,716 3, 443,462 10.8% 669,254 78.5% 248,411
INTERGOVERNMENTAL
Library 919,983 - 919,983 0.0% - 919,983 0.0%
Fire 1,500,000 1, - 500,000 1, 0.0% - 500,000 0.0%
Other Intergovernmental 497,078 1,100 497,078 0.2% (14, 495,977 - 150) 107.8% Total 2, 2,917,061 1,100 917,061 2, 0.0% (14, 915,960 - 150) 107.8%
FEES & SERVICE CHARGES
Community Development 7,762,650 7, 1, 762,650 6, 034,032 13.3% 728,618 32.8% 778,575 Parks & Recreation 4,869,967 4, 1, 869,967 3, 043,536 21.4% 23,593 826,431 4323.0% Other Service Charges 3,262,558 3, 262,558 3, 251,231 7.7% 011,327 -25.2% 335,764 Total 15, 15,895,175 2, 895,175 13, 328,798 14.7% 1, 566,376 137,932 104.7%
OTHER REVENUES
Interfund Charges & Reimburseme 17, 17,339,859 1, 339,859 15, 341,444 7.7% 1, 998,415 13.2% 185,136 Overhead Indirect Allocations 12,953,367 12, 1, 953,367 11, 076,098 8.3% 877,269 35.2% 795,648 Interfund Transfers 637,407 64,951 637,407 10.2% 20,876 572,456 211.1% Interfund Loans 24,140 24,140 - 24,140 0.0% -
Miscellaneous 1,201,292 1, 2,005 201,292 1, 0.2% 328 199,287 510.5% Donations 77,500 77,500 - 77,500 0.0% - 0.0%
Franchise Fees 6,500,000 6, 500,000 6, 296,821 4.6% 203,179 -42.0% 512,149 Total 38, 38,733,565 2, 733,565 35, 781,319 7.2% 2, 952,246 10.6% 514,137 Subtotal Non-Tax Revenues 65, 65,303,894 5, 303,894 59, 923,854 9.1% 4, 380,040 47.7% 009,408 TOTAL REVENUES 242,899,394 15, 242,899,394 152,342 6.2% 9, 227,747,052 52.1% 963,237
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
General Fund
Interim Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
YTD
Remaining Expended
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with and Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Encumbered YTD
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
Mayor & City Council
MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL 1, 1,356,249 94,190 356,249 2,936 1, 7.2% 94,379 259,123
ARTS & COMMUNITY
PROMOTIONS 2, 2,000,318 021,798 237,500 1, 733,980 48.1% 050,318 250,000 Total 3, 3,356,567 378,047 331,690 2, 736,916 31.6% 309,441 344,379 City Attorney
ADMINISTRATION 5, 5,612,505 692,376 213,372 4, 527,924 13.0% 951,080 102,621 CITY ATTORNEY-ADVISORY 16,000 - 80,916 16,000 (80, 0.0% 916) 102,908 LITIGATION - - 76,442 - (76, 0.0% 97,181 442)
ENFORCEMENT - - 68,630 - (68, 0.0% 62,306 630)
Total 5, 5,612,505 708,376 439,360 4, 543,924 17.2% 725,092 365,016 Administration
CITY ADMINISTRATOR 3, 3,268,068 385,510 224,667 2, 220,862 13.2% 939,981 200,071 CITY TV 620,913 38,779 645,216 24,303 9.8% 38,904 582,134 DOWNTOWN PROGRAM 1, 1,870,507 73,575 870,507 95,845 1, 9.1% - 701,086 HOUSING MEDIATION 547,928 9,811 547,928 - 1.8% - 538,116 COMMUNITY VITALITY 850,162 10,622 850,162 - 1.2% - 839,539 CITY CLERK 974,650 68,691 999,152 24,503 9.3% 63,967 905,959 Total 8, 8,132,226 298,474 426,145 7, 365,513 9.5% 506,815 302,942 Human Resources
HUMAN RESOURCES 2, 2,455,968 505,245 67,777 144,919 2, 8.5% 292,549 157,348 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 384,894 25,007 493,567 108,673 27.1% 20,392 359,887 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT 98,068 94,447 - 3,621 94,447 3.7% - Total 3, 2,935,310 096,880 169,926 2, 180,071 11.3% 746,884 177,740 Finance
ADMINISTRATION 342,626 28,951 372,240 29,614 15.7% 30,811 313,675 MANAGEMENT 1, 949,533 55,684 199,479 249,946 25.5% 47,939 893,849 CASHIERING & COLLECTION 1, 1,684,907 97,346 868,437 1, 183,530 15.0% 587,562 100,345 BUDGET MANAGEMENT 1, 1,067,783 62,103 292,247 1, 224,464 22.2% 56,860 005,680 ACCOUNTING 1, 1,245,821 76,137 245,821 88,894 1, 13.2% 78,826 080,790 MISCELLANEOUS 519,768 39,561 519,768 - 7.6% 42,788 480,207 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 311,736 22,441 324,186 12,450 10.8% 24,392 289,295 SERVICE 1, 928,460 55,248 078,808 150,348 19.1% (92, 873,212 669) PURCHASING 858,216 66,441 858,216 - 7.7% 64,644 791,775 CENTRAL WAREHOUSE 220,475 17,215 220,475 - 7.8% 17,144 203,260 MAIL SERVICES 185,000 15,381 193,082 9,350 12.8% 14,474 168,351 Total 9, 8,314,325 172,758 536,509 7, 948,596 16.2% 687,654 385,552
TOTAL GENERAL
GOVERNMENT 29, 28,350,933 1, 654,536 2, 903,631 24, 775,020 15.8% 1, 975,886 575,629 General Fund
Interim Statement of Appropriations, Expenditures and Encumbrances For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
YTD
Remaining Expended
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with and Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Encumbered YTD General Fund
Interim Statement of Appropriations, Expenditures and Encumbrances For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
PUBLIC SAFETY
Police
CHIEF'S STAFF 2, 2,711,702 727,053 19,463 301,185 2, 11.8% 406,405 238,212 BUSINESS OFFICE 1, 1,080,247 79,870 080,247 - 1, 7.4% 81,179 000,378 RECORDS BUREAU 2, 2,354,721 379,521 24,800 162,592 2, 7.9% 192,129 163,735 STRATEGIC OPERATIONS 2, 2,786,798 799,191 21,517 179,210 2, 7.2% 598,464 162,906 PROPERTY ROOM 325,300 23,502 325,300 - 7.2% 14,749 301,799 TRAINING, RECRUITMENT/WELLNES 3, 3,898,322 963,147 234,668 3, 117,876 8.9% 610,604 206,307 RANGE AND EQUIPMENT 2, 2,103,076 169,291 66,215 157,437 1, 10.3% 945,638 146,927 INF.TECHNOLOGY/CRIME ANALYSIS 2, 2,074,900 123,582 84,041 469,818 1, 26.1% 569,723 435,570 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS & INTER 7, 7,046,070 091,243 65,848 540,969 6, 8.6% 484,426 481,332 CRIME LAB 199,614 14,522 199,614 - 7.3% 13,670 185,092
FIELD OPERATIONS DIVISION 25, 25,304,759 1, 356,282 51,569 887,969 23, 7.6% 1, 416,744 763,857 TRAFFIC 1, 1,406,459 406,459 - 139,562 1, 9.9% 97,476 266,897 SPECIAL EVENTS 676,025 21,303 710,483 49,138 9.9% 51,169 640,043 STREET CRIMES UNIT 2, 2,203,889 625,716 - 207,085 2, 7.9% 418,631 168,106 SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT TEAM 108,194 - 108,194 - 0.0% 4,678 108,194 PARKING AND STREET SWEEPING 406,848 24,828 406,848 - 6.1% 25,589 382,020 PARKING ENFORCEMENT 1, 1,186,147 82,580 198,101 11,954 1, 7.9% 71,369 103,566 COMBINED COMMUNICATIONS CTR 4, 4,277,707 277,707 - 290,264 3, 6.8% 987,443 309,782 ANIMAL CONTROL 1, 1,042,167 34,567 063,750 21,515 1, 5.3% 38,625 007,668 Total 62, 61,192,945 4, 011,729 851,929 56, 533,936 8.7% 4, 625,865 475,239 Fire
ADMINISTRATION 1, 1,620,294 620,294 - 182,795 1, 11.3% 437,498 170,421 EMERGENCY SRVS / PUBLIC ED 543,168 42,262 543,168 - 7.8% 33,617 500,906 PREVENTION 1, 1,516,456 516,456 - 108,272 1, 7.1% 99,046 408,184 WILDLAND FIRE MITIGATION PROG 397,918 26,916 397,918 - 6.8% 27,359 371,002 OPERATIONS 32, 32,499,169 2, 662,009 378,126 30, 168,991 7.8% 2, 114,892 377,179 TRAINING AND RECRUITMENT 1, 1,713,641 67,849 731,845 18,205 1, 5.0% 78,994 645,791 ARFF 4, 4,090,031 090,031 - 346,175 3, 8.5% 743,856 295,753 Total 42, 42,380,676 3, 561,721 152,395 39, 187,195 7.8% 3, 222,131 082,370 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 103,573,620 8, 104,573,450 004,324 95, 721,131 8.3% 7, 847,995 557,609
PUBLIC WORKS
Public Works
ADMINISTRATION 1,927,270 1, 936,520 9,250 112,522 1, 6.3% 814,749 134,062 ENGINEERING SVCS 10,831,773 10, 836,120 7,469 786,422 10, 7.3% 042,229 693,241 PUBLIC RT OF WAY MGMT 2,428,203 2, 445,589 20,509 178,393 2, 8.1% 246,686 161,682 Total 15, 15,187,246 1, 218,229 37,228 077,337 14, 7.3% 103,664 988,984 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 15, 15,187,246 1, 218,229 37,228 077,337 14, 7.3% 103,664 988,984
YTD
Remaining Expended
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with and Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Encumbered YTD General Fund
Interim Statement of Appropriations, Expenditures and Encumbrances For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Parks & Recreation
REC PROGRAM MGMT 883,128 91,272 883,128 15,232 12.1% 90,300 776,623 FACILITIES & SPECIAL EVENTS 2, 2,450,750 415,108 163,993 1, 321,703 20.1% 929,412 147,311 YOUTH ACTIVITIES 1, 1,802,962 802,962 6,465 207,672 1, 11.9% 588,825 185,358 ACTIVE ADULTS 1, 1,175,653 175,653 9,702 102,145 1, 9.5% 063,806 101,797 AQUATICS 2, 2,711,087 711,087 480,341 1, 312,529 29.2% 918,218 447,906 SPORTS 1, 1,593,010 569,726 154,553 1, 218,045 23.7% 197,128 129,319 TENNIS - - 708 - ( 708) #DIV/0! 21,062
NEIGHBORHOOD/OUTREACH SERV 1, 1,679,472 680,234 30,385 118,324 1, 8.9% 531,525 106,340 ADMINISTRATION 1, 1,740,812 740,812 851 133,721 1, 7.7% 606,240 114,315 PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM 1, 1,141,579 81,837 165,241 21,934 1, 8.9% 67,690 061,470 PARK OPERATIONS MNGMNT 1, 1,510,344 510,604 60,130 104,360 1, 10.9% 346,114 105,631 GROUNDS & FACILITIES MAINT. 8, 8,243,319 330,658 492,851 7, 425,636 11.0% 412,171 459,236 FORESTRY 2, 2,139,374 139,374 135,670 1, 198,530 15.6% 805,174 128,514 BEACH MAINTENANCE 363,025 27,074 363,025 15,408 11.7% 16,123 320,542 MEDIANS PARKWAYS&CONTRACTS 612,913 17,781 612,913 275,443 47.8% 15,601 319,689 Total 28, 28,047,427 2, 100,524 1, 312,301 23, 911,994 15.0% 2, 876,230 136,502 Library
ADMINISTRATION 1,080,355 1, 66,078 080,355 - 1, 6.1% 80,707 014,277 CENTRAL LIBRARY 7,659,841 7, 660,101 479,170 6, 190,405 8.7% 990,525 410,528 EASTSIDE LIBRARY 661,165 46,158 661,165 1,407 7.2% 41,831 613,600 LIBRARY ON THE GO 461,718 31,526 461,718 - 6.8% 19,637 430,192 ADULT EDUCATION - - 21,225 - (21, 0.0% 29,146 225)
Total 9, 9,863,079 863,339 644,157 9, 191,812 8.5% 027,369 581,849 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 37, 37,910,506 2, 963,863 2, 956,458 32, 103,806 13.3% 2, 903,599 718,352
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Community Development
ADMINISTRATION 1, 1,165,113 165,113 63,000 135,165 17.0% 966,948 148,545 RENTAL HOUSING MEDIATION - - 24,220 - (24, 0.0% 29,580 220) HUMAN SERVICES - 2,182 149,733 (2, 149,733 0.0% 2,613 182) LONG RANGE PLAN & SPEC STUDY 1, 1,540,735 81,473 576,089 50,694 1, 8.4% 88,020 443,921 DEVEL & ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 2, 2,089,169 157,840 66,688 149,890 1, 10.0% 941,262 135,164 ZONING INFO & ENFORCEMENT 1, 1,839,465 839,465 21,750 133,115 1, 8.4% 684,600 118,039 DESIGN REV & HIST PRESERVATIO 1, 1,909,414 909,414 1,100 137,414 1, 7.3% 770,900 127,016 BLDG INSP & CODE ENFORCEMENT 2, 2,070,662 072,070 709 165,219 1, 8.0% 906,143 124,697 RECORDS ARCHIVES & CLER SVCS 776,448 56,834 776,448 27,938 10.9% 51,946 691,676 BLDG COUNTER & PLAN REV SVCS 3, 3,439,615 779,598 219,663 3, 361,577 15.4% 198,358 181,611 CODE COMPLIANCE 1, 1,138,778 91,378 143,025 4,503 1, 8.4% 73,639 047,144 Total 16, 15,969,397 1, 568,795 196,551 14, 747,692 11.7% 1, 624,551 080,870 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 16, 15,969,397 1, 568,795 196,551 14, 747,692 11.7% 1, 624,551 080,870
YTD
Remaining Expended
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with and Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Encumbered YTD General Fund
Interim Statement of Appropriations, Expenditures and Encumbrances For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE
Sustainability and Resilience
ABATEMENT 305,513 1,221 399,992 272,101 68.3% 4,968 126,670 Total 305,513 1,221 399,992 272,101 68.3% 4,968 126,670 TAL SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE 305,513 1,221 399,992 272,101 68.3% 4,968 126,670
NON-DEPARTMENTAL
Non-Departmental
TRANSFERS OUT 4,311,777 4, 2, 311,777 - 168,765 2, 50.3% 58,575 143,012 CAPITAL OUTLAY TRANSFER 575,026 73,200 575,026 - 12.7% 501,826 110,833 APPROP. RESERVE 500,000 - 500,000 - 0.0% - 500,000
MEASURE C SALES TAX 35,119,802 75, 034,819 - 478,007 74, 0.6% 2, 556,812 849,954 MEASURE I TRANSFER 4,187,682 4, 3, 187,682 - 001,026 1, 71.7% - 186,655 Sub Total 84, 44,694,287 5, 609,304 - 720,999 78, 6.8% 3, 888,305 019,362 ANTICIPATED SALARY SAVINGS (601,260) (601,260) - (601,260) - 0.0% - TOTAL NON-DEPARTMENTAL 84, 44,093,027 5, 008,044 - 720,999 78, 6.8% 3, 287,045 019,362 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 245,390,243 20, 288,386,909 6, 860,521 656,978 9.5% 16, 260,869,409 945,774 ** The legal level of budgetary control is at the department level for the General Fund. Therefore, as long as the department as a whole is within budget, budgetary compliance has been achieved. The City actively monitors the budget status of each department and takes measures to address potential over budget situations before they occur.
For Enterprise and Internal Service Funds, the level of budgetary control is at the fund level. The City also monitors and addresses these fund types for potential over budget situations.
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
Revenue 245,000 245,000 23,727 - 221,273 9.7% -
Expenditures 245,000 245,000 23,727 - 221,273 9.7% 20,911 Revenue Less Expenditures - - - - - (20,911)
CREEK RESTORATION/WATER QUALITY IMPRVMT
Revenue 6,772,647 6,772,647 669,585 - 6,103,063 9.9% 600,438 Expenditures 7,136,975 7,488,082 390,104 1,566,691 5,531,288 26.1% 365,192 Revenue Less Expenditures (715,435) (364,328) 279,481 (1,566,691) 571,775 235,246
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
Revenue 1,147,812 1,147,812 14,334 - 1,133,478 1.2% 2,227 Expenditures 1,146,418 2,854,986 13,328 972,220 1,869,438 34.5% 7,545 Revenue Less Expenditures (1,707,174) 1,394 1,006 (972,220) (735,960) (5,318)
COUNTY LIBRARY
Revenue 498,834 498,834 480 - 498,354 0.1% 343
Expenditures 487,876 489,687 23,998 3,668 462,021 5.6% 25,346 Revenue Less Expenditures 9,147 10,958 (23,518) (3,668) 36,333 (25,003)
STREETS FUND
Revenue 14,454,321 14,454,321 1,008,223 - 13,446,098 7.0% 763,761 Expenditures 14,583,350 15,100,125 1,080,840 143,356 13,875,929 8.1% 1,100,382 Revenue Less Expenditures (645,804) (129,029) (72,617) (143,356) (429,831) (336,622)
MEASURE A FUND
Revenue 5,211,328 5,211,328 8,594 - 5,202,734 0.2% 18,055 Expenditures 5,519,615 5,586,827 349,383 737,754 4,499,691 19.5% 322,509 Revenue Less Expenditures (375,499) (308,287) (340,788) (737,754) 703,043 (304,454)
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
Special Revenue Funds
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
REVENUES
Service charges 42,584,431 42,584,431 3,615,938 - 38,968,494 8.5% 3,220,653 Other Fees & Charges 30,000 30,000 4,534 - 25,466 15.1% 1,389 Investment Income 295,599 295,599 41,921 - 253,678 14.2% 22,626 Rents & Concessions 30,133 30,133 5,023 - 25,110 16.7% - Grants 21,651 21,651 - - 21,651 0.0% -
Miscellaneous 28,888 28,888 - - 28,888 0.0% 25
TOTAL REVENUES 42,990,702 42,990,702 3,667,416 - 39,323,286 8.5% 3,244,693
EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 2,416,512 2,416,512 158,795 - 2,257,717 6.6% 157,507 Materials, Supplies & Services 38,686,000 38,814,267 1,344,385 20,915,508 16,554,373 57.3% 1,264,838 Special Projects 810,100 1,131,458 3,177 9,841 1,118,440 1.2% - Transfers-Out 200,000 200,000 16,667 - 183,333 8.3% -
Equipment 220,600 335,730 519 82,043 253,168 24.6% 6,784 Other 40,000 40,000 - - 40,000 0.0% -
TOTAL EXPENSES 42,937,966 42,373,212 1,523,544 21,007,392 20,407,031 52.5% 1,429,129 Revenue Less Expense 52,736 617,491 2,143,872 (21,007,392) 18,916,256 1,815,564
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
SOLID WASTE FUND
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
REVENUES
Water Sales- Metered 73,480,000 73,480,000 6,159,754 - 67,320,246 8.4% 5,177,622 Service Charges 254,500 254,500 35,126 - 219,374 13.8% 20,232 Cater JPA Treatment 2,400,000 2,400,000 - - 2,400,000 0.0% - Investment Income 3,770,100 3,770,100 543,515 - 3,226,585 14.4% 301,961 Reimbursements 6,691,346 6,691,346 36,591 - 6,654,755 0.5% 20,652 Miscellaneous 160,000 160,000 250 - 159,750 0.2% 14,857 TOTAL REVENUES 86,755,946 86,755,946 6,775,236 - 79,980,710 7.8% 5,535,325
EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 17,350,630 17,350,630 1,247,649 - 16,102,981 7.2% 1,173,128 Materials, Supplies 26,341,590 29,146,932 892,048 5,836,913 22,417,971 23.1% 832,179 Special Projects 1,000,535 1,676,497 8,625 111,635 1,556,237 7.2% 8,000 Water Purchases 8,670,000 9,418,842 362,246 - 9,056,595 3.8% 1,156,902 Debt Service 8,531,662 8,531,662 - - 8,531,662 0.0% 849,840 Transfer-Out 61,392 61,392 4,268 - 57,124 7.0% -
Capital Outlay Transfers 26,247,004 26,247,004 2,187,250 - 24,059,754 8.3% 1,965,246 Equipment 248,899 258,428 65 47,045 211,318 18.2% 24,213 Capitalized Fixed Assets 961,653 695,000 69,949 271,896 619,808 35.5% - Other 33,800 36,800 - 3,000 33,800 8.2% -
Appropriated Reserve 150,000 150,000 - - 150,000 0.0% - TOTAL EXPENSES 93,839,839 89,330,512 4,772,101 6,270,489 82,797,249 11.8% 6,009,509 Revenue Less Expense (7,083,893) (2,574,566) 2,003,135 (6,270,489) (2,816,539) (474,184)
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
WATER OPERATING FUND
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with % of Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
REVENUES
Service Charges 33,022,315 33,022,315 2,640,888 - 30,381,427 8.0% 2,390,380 Fees 636,100 636,100 45,889 - 590,211 7.2% 89,248
Investment Income 788,000 788,000 80,561 - 707,439 10.2% 64,718 Rents & Concessions 41,000 41,000 4,505 - 36,495 11.0% 4,285 Miscellaneous 5,000 5,000 8,700 - (3,700) 174.0% -
TOTAL REVENUES 34,492,415 34,492,415 2,780,543 - 31,711,872 8.1% 2,548,631
EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 11,447,868 11,447,868 862,886 - 10,584,983 7.5% 774,963 Materials, Supplies&Servs. 14,924,059 13,786,691 736,015 3,121,382 11,066,662 25.8% 648,926 Special Projects 762,600 1,012,761 - 74,832 937,929 7.4% - Transfer-Out 61,392 61,392 4,268 - 57,124 7.0% -
Debt Service 3,557,337 3,557,337 341,981 - 3,215,356 9.6% 341,981 Capital Outlay Transfers 7,230,962 7,230,962 602,580 - 6,628,382 8.3% 429,979 Equipment 137,900 154,400 - 16,500 137,900 10.7% 5,495
Capitalized Fixed Assets 177,000 257,018 - 3,016 254,001 1.2% - Other 2,800 6,800 - 4,000 2,800 58.8% -
TOTAL EXPENSES 38,652,597 37,164,550 2,547,729 3,219,730 32,885,137 14.9% 2,201,344 Revenue Less Expense (4,160,182) (2,672,135) 232,813 (3,219,730) (1,173,265) 347,288 Miscellaneous
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
WASTEWATER OPERATING FUND
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with % of Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
REVENUES
Improvement Tax 1,000,000 1, 000,000 - 117,380 11.7% 882,620 128,734 Parking Fees 8,671,008 8, 671,008 - 765,010 7, 8.8% 905,998 719,264 Other Fees & Charges 2,000 2,000 53.15 - 1,947 2.7% (1, 983) Investment Income 151,000 17,799 151,000 - 11.8% 13,166 133,201 Rents & Concessions 148,399 31,506 148,399 - 21.2% 26,554 116,893 Miscellaneous 133,890 2,633 133,890 - 2.0% (84) 131,257 Operating Transfers-In 133,618 11,135 133,618 - 8.3% 58,575 122,483 TOTAL REVENUES 10,239,915 10,239,915 945,517 - 9, 9.2% 294,398 944,226
EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 5,456,925 5, 456,925 - 462,550 4, 8.5% 994,375 452,496 Materials, Supplies & Ser 4, 4,036,245 054,167 207,586 3,341,139 505,442 17.6% 283,566 Special Projects 130,093 - 326,647 212,330 114,317 35.0% - Transfer-Out 4,600 4,600 - - 4,600 0.0% -
Capital Outlay Transfers 640,000 53,333 640,000 - 8.3% 35,417 586,667 Equipment 15,000 15,000 - - 15,000 0.0% -
Appropriated Reserve 10,000 10,000 - - 10,000 0.0% -
TOTAL EXPENSES 10,507,339 10,292,863 723,470 9,164,111 619,759 12.8% 771,479 Revenue Less Expense ( (52,948) 267,424) ( 222,047 619,759) 130,287 172,747 Miscellaneous
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
DOWNTOWN PARKING FUND
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
REVENUES
Leases-Commercial/Industr 6,212,195 6,212,195 472,986 - 5,739,209 7.6% 477,749 Leases-Terminal 14,062,360 14,062,360 774,584 - 13,287,775 5.5% 765,777 Leases-Non-Commercial Av 5,621,893 5,621,893 381,931 - 5,239,962 6.8% 438,444 Leases-Commercial Aviatio 7,863,830 7,863,830 434,312 - 7,429,518 5.5% 522,618 Investment Income 734,000 734,000 80,303 - 653,697 10.9% 66,948 Service Charges 1,719 1,719 - - 1,719 0.0% -
Miscellaneous 67,738 67,738 1,600 - 66,138 2.4% 6,937
Operating Transfers-In 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 0.0% 83,333 TOTAL REVENUES 35,563,735 35,563,735 2,145,716 - 33,418,019 6.0% 2,361,807
EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 13,500,118 13,500,118 972,452 - 12,527,666 7.2% 904,224 Materials, Supplies & Servic 17,366,579 16,740,663 890,636 2,094,161 14,381,782 17.2% 667,701 Special Projects 954,200 1,878,403 1,229 432,625 1,444,548 23.1% 3,355 Transfer-Out 315,661 315,661 22,482 - 293,179 7.1% 42,590 Debt Service 1,556,263 1,556,263 129,689 - 1,426,574 8.3% - Capital Outlay Transfers 8,495,979 8,495,979 707,452 - 7,788,527 8.3% 246,944 Equipment 250,806 288,584 14,487 37,778 236,319 18.1% 4,872 Appropriated Reserve 131,556 131,556 - - 131,556 0.0% - TOTAL EXPENSES 43,537,142 41,945,246 2,738,426 2,568,564 38,230,152 12.2% 1,869,686 Revenue Less Expense (7,973,407) (6,381,511) (592,710) (2,568,564) (4,812,133) 492,121 Miscellaneous
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
AIRPORT OPERATING FUND
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
REVENUES
Fees & Card Sales 4,851,282 4,851,282 499,238 - 4,352,044 10.3% 430,756 Investment Income 174,000 174,000 25,153 - 148,847 14.5% 14,311 Rents & Concessions 242,550 242,550 18,518 - 224,032 7.6% 17,976 Miscellaneous - - 339 - (339) 0.0% 123
TOTAL REVENUES 5,267,832 5,267,832 543,248 - 4,724,584 10.3% 463,165
EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 119,176 119,176 9,808 - 109,368 8.2% 8,937 Materials, Supplies & Srvs. 3,952,760 3,952,760 120,050 - 3,832,710 3.0% 111,185 Capital Outlay Transfers 1,670,000 1,670,000 139,167 - 1,530,833 8.3% 50,000 TOTAL EXPENSES 5,741,937 5,741,937 269,025 - 5,472,912 4.7% 170,122 Revenue Less Expense (474,105) (474,105) 274,224 - (748,328) 293,043 Miscellaneous
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
GOLF COURSE FUND
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
REVENUES
Service Charges 3,211,405 3,211,405 267,617 - 2,943,788 8.3% 209,147 Work Orders - Bldg Maint. 5,068,194 5,068,194 411,120 - 4,657,074 8.1% 386,183 Miscellaneous 5,500 5,500 - - 5,500 0.0% -
TOTAL REVENUES 8,285,099 8,285,099 678,737 - 7,606,361 8.2% 595,330
EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 4,319,283 4,319,283 296,341 - 4,022,942 6.9% 336,142 Materials, Supplies & Svcs. 2,946,651 3,003,573 148,526 854,887 2,000,159 33.4% 135,582 Special Projects 534,750 540,908 1,414 226,759 312,735 42.2% 2,942 Equipment 5,000 45,370 17,250 23,120 5,000 89.0% -
Appropriated Reserve 39,000 39,000 - - 39,000 0.0% -
TOTAL EXPENSES 7,948,134 7,844,685 463,531 1,104,767 6,379,837 19.7% 474,665 Revenue Less Expense 336,964 440,414 215,206 (1,104,767) 1,226,524 120,664
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FUND
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
REVENUES
Vehicle Rental Charges 6,462,197 6,462,197 424,991 - 6,037,206 6.6% 442,282 Investment Income 884,077 884,077 128,754 - 755,323 14.6% 64,720 Rents & Concessions 103,173 103,173 8,598 - 94,575 8.3% 8,598 Miscellaneous 68,000 68,000 - - 68,000 0.0% 90,532
Operating Transfers-In - - - - - #DIV/0! -
TOTAL REVENUES 7,517,447 7,517,447 562,344 - 6,955,103 7.5% 606,133
EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 233,427 233,427 16,352 - 217,075 7.0% 14,708 Materials, Supplies & Svcs. 67,178 67,178 6,661 20,367 40,150 40.2% 1,827 Debt Service 624,562 624,562 - - 624,562 0.0% -
Capitalized Fixed Assets 4,300,026 9,398,655 - 1,124,804 8,273,851 12.0% - TOTAL EXPENSES 10,323,822 5,225,193 23,013 1,145,170 9,155,639 11.3% 16,535 Revenue Less Expense (2,806,375) 2,292,254 539,330 (1,145,170) (2,200,535) 589,598
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
FLEET REPLACEMENT FUND
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
REVENUES
Vehicle Maintenance Cha 4,042,561 4,042,561 333,164 - 3,709,396 8.2% 283,174 Reimbursements 5,000 5,000 417 - 4,583 8.3% 417
Miscellaneous 127,252 127,252 9,665 - 117,587 7.6% 9,665 TOTAL REVENUES 4,174,813 4,174,813 343,246 - 3,831,567 8.2% 293,256
EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 1,850,256 1,850,256 138,930 - 1,711,325 7.5% 135,896 Materials, Supplies & Svcs 2,089,501 2,089,501 118,612 495,449 1,475,440 29.4% 129,858 Special Projects 56,804 67,723 7,108 20,050 40,565 40.1% 6,257 Equipment 7,884 7,884 - 237 7,647 3.0% -
Appropriated Reserve 19,000 19,000 - - 19,000 0.0% -
TOTAL EXPENSES 4,034,363 4,023,444 264,650 515,736 3,253,977 19.3% 272,011 Revenue Less Expense 140,450 151,369 78,596 (515,736) 577,590 21,244
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
FLEET MAINTENANCE FUND
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
REVENUES
Insurance Premiums 16,263,468 16,263,468 1,300,075 - 14,963,393 8.0% 1,090,762 Workers' Compensation Premiums 8,369,373 8,369,373 698,489 - 7,670,884 8.3% 541,542 OSH Charges 361,744 361,744 29,104 - 332,640 8.0% 30,145 Unemployment Insurance Premium 191,912 191,912 15,993 - 175,919 8.3% 15,993 Investment Income 152,000 152,000 35,370 - 116,630 23.3% 16,496 Operating Transfers-In 75,825 75,825 6,319 - 69,506 8.3% 6,319 TOTAL REVENUES 25,414,322 25,414,322 2,085,349 - 23,328,973 8.2% 1,701,257
EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 1,081,011 1,081,011 86,309 - 994,702 8.0% 75,962 Materials, Supplies & Services 23,702,665 23,915,862 956,244 543,117 22,416,501 6.3% 858,537 Capital Outlay Transfers 409 409 - - 409 0.0% -
TOTAL EXPENSES 24,997,281 24,784,085 1,042,552 543,117 23,411,612 6.3% 934,499 Revenue Less Expense 417,041 630,237 1,042,797 (543,117) (82,640) 766,758 The Self Insurance Trust Fund is an internal service fund of the City, which accounts for the cost of providing workers' compensation, property and liability insurance as well as unemployment insurance and certain self-insured employee benefits on a city-wide basis. Internal Service Funds charge other funds for the cost of providing their specific services.
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
SELF INSURANCE TRUST FUND
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
REVENUES
Service charges 9,909,521 9,909,521 825,794 - 9,083,727 8.3% 734,872 Operating Transfers-In 692,803 692,803 35,286 - 657,517 5.1% 21,757 TOTAL REVENUES 10,602,324 10,602,324 861,080 - 9,741,244 8.1% 756,629
EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 5,978,120 5,978,120 417,644 - 5,560,477 7.0% 362,677 Materials, Supplies & Services 3,503,075 3,528,319 954,391 419,188 2,154,740 38.9% 595,458 Special Projects 450 650 - - 650 0.0% -
Capital Outlay Transfers 257,586 257,586 21,466 - 236,121 8.3% 20,234 Equipment 197,440 197,440 (78) - 197,518 0.0% -
TOTAL EXPENSES 9,961,465 9,936,222 1,393,422 419,188 8,148,855 18.2% 978,369 Revenue Less Expense 640,859 666,102 (532,342) (419,188) 1,592,389 (221,740)
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
REVENUES
Leases - Commercial 2,350,000 2,350,000 236,568 - 2,113,432 10.1% 120,735 Leases - Food Service 3,150,000 3,150,000 369,987 - 2,780,013 11.7% 243,552 Slip Rental Fees 6,442,630 6,442,630 545,005 - 5,897,625 8.5% 517,743 Visitors Fees 861,900 861,900 64,171 - 797,729 7.4% 76,980 Slip Transfer Fees 1,000,000 1,000,000 94,650 - 905,350 9.5% 57,000 Parking Revenue 4,499,350 4,499,350 422,791 - 4,076,559 9.4% 540,193 Wharf Parking 414,580 414,580 37,104 - 377,476 8.9% 44,916 Other Fees & Charges 235,565 235,565 20,801 - 214,764 8.8% 20,351 Investment Income 556,000 556,000 68,373 - 487,627 12.3% 46,493 Rents & Concessions 466,000 466,000 41,801 - 424,199 9.0% 40,524 Miscellaneous 812,830 812,830 21,020 - 791,810 2.6% 22,506 Operating Transfers-In - - - - - #DIV/0! -
TOTAL REVENUES 20,788,855 20,788,855 1,922,270 - 18,866,585 9.2% 1,730,993
EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 9,517,459 9,517,459 736,671 - 8,780,787 7.7% 678,323 Materials, Supplies & Svcs. 8,166,920 8,290,311 436,181 1,210,496 6,643,635 19.9% 332,376 Special Projects 212,720 265,375 41,736 - 223,639 15.7% 41,193 Debt Service 2,029,369 2,029,369 889,263 - 1,140,106 43.8% 889,263 Capital Outlay Transfers 2,595,000 2,595,000 216,250 - 2,378,750 8.3% 189,583 Equipment 101,000 101,000 3,135 - 97,865 3.1% -
Capitalized Fixed Assets - 25,000 - - 25,000 0.0% -
Other 10,000 14,000 - 4,000 10,000 28.6% -
Appropriated Reserve 100,000 100,000 - - 100,000 0.0% - TOTAL EXPENSES 22,937,514 22,732,468 2,323,237 1,214,496 19,399,782 15.4% 2,130,739 Revenue Less Expense (2,148,659) (1,943,613) (400,967) (1,214,496) (533,197) (399,746) Miscellaneous
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
WATERFRONT OPERATING FUND
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
REVENUES
Service Charges 47,370,084 47,370,084 - - 47,370,084 0.0% - Investment Income 443,000 443,000 55,165 - 387,835 12.5% 70,625 Rents & Concessions 30,133 30,133 5,023 - 25,110 16.7% - TOTAL REVENUES 47,843,217 47,843,217 60,188 - 47,783,029 0.1% 70,625
EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 1,911,876 1,911,876 139,654 - 1,772,222 7.3% 93,616 Materials, Supplies & Svc 47,650,446 46,077,671 4,727,057 4,943,133 37,980,256 20.3% 1,660,702 Special Projects 2,104,671 4,011,585 26,273 - 3,985,311 0.7% 19,140 Equipment 5,500 5,500 260 - 5,240 4.7% -
Other 473,701 473,701 - - 473,701 0.0% -
TOTAL EXPENSES 54,053,107 50,573,418 4,893,243 4,943,133 44,216,731 18.2% 1,773,458 Revenue Less Expense (6,209,890) (2,730,201) (4,833,055) (4,943,133) 3,566,298 (1,702,833)
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
SANTA BARBARA CLEAN ENERGY FUND
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
REVENUES
Service charges 2,221,036 2,221,036 185,086 - 2,035,950 8.3% 179,334 Miscellaneous 67,750 67,750 3,684 - 64,067 5.4% 5,671
TOTAL REVENUES 2,288,786 2,288,786 188,770 - 2,100,016 8.2% 185,005
EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 92,493 92,493 6,571 - 85,922 7.1% 31,248 Materials, Supplies & Servic 2,185,105 2,097,385 7,903 87,720 2,089,482 4.4% 10,712 Special Projects 123,500 329,649 4,908 29,639 295,103 10.5% 683 TOTAL EXPENSES 2,607,247 2,313,378 19,382 117,359 2,470,507 5.2% 42,643 Revenue Less Expense (318,461) (24,592) 169,388 (117,359) (370,490) 142,363 Miscellaneous
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
For One Month Ended July 31, 2025 (8.33% of Fiscal Year)
ENERGY AND CLIMATE MANAGEMENT FUND
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: October 7, 2025
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Parks and Recreation Department
Public Works Department
SUBJECT: Fourth Contract Amendment with RRM Design Group for Final Design and Construction Documents for the Dwight Murphy Field Renewal Project [Agreement]
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council authorize the Public Works Director to execute a fourth contract amendment with RRM Design Group in the amount of $87,000 for soils testing and playground safety audits during construction of the Dwight Murphy Field Renewal Project for a new not-toexceed dollar amount of $1,339,441 for all services.
DISCUSSION:
Project Background
On May 6, 2025, City Council awarded Ohno Construction a contract for the full-scale revitalization of Dwight Murphy Field in the amount of $26,773,425. The contractor broke ground on June 5, 2025, and completion of the project is scheduled for late December 2026. During construction, City staff realized it would be more advantageous to have RRM Design Group contract directly with Earth Systems and PlaySafe, LLC Recreational Consulting and Services to provide construction administration testing and inspection audits.
Project Description
The Project includes a full-scale renovation of the 9-acre park, first established in 1925 as the Municipal Soccer Field. Project elements include: a multi-sport turf field; natural informal activity area; all-abilities inclusive playground; expanded fitness area; family picnic area; trash enclosure; restroom; and the restoration of a portion of Sycamore Creek. Other amenities include trees. landscaping, accessible pathways, fencing, lighting, right-of-way and park access improvements for vehicular circulation, a bus loading zone, and the increase of onsite and perimeter parking from 196 to 242 spaces.
Agenda Item No. 10
File Code No. 630.02
Council Agenda Report
Fourth Contract Amendment with RRM Design Group for Final Design and Construction Documents for the Dwight Murphy Field Renewal Project [Agreement] October 7, 2025
Contract Amendment
On December 14, 2021, Council authorized the Public Works Director to execute a professional services agreement with RRM in the amount of $838,191 to prepare final design and construction documents, including specifications and estimates, for the Project. On April 18, 2023, Council approved the first contract amendment for $83,590 for supplemental field investigation work. On December 10, 2024, Council approved the second contract amendment for $18,700 to provide additional bid support for the project.
On May 6, 2025, Council approved the third contract amendment for $311,960 to provide construction administration support. The purpose of the fourth contract amendment, in an amount of $87,000, is to provide soils testing and playground safety audits during construction for a new not-to-exceed total contract dollar amount of $1,339,441.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Funding for the contract amendment is appropriated in the Fiscal Year 2025 Measure C Capital Outlay Fund.
The following outlines the total project cost, including the additional expenditure in this report:
Construction Contract (Ohno Construction) $26,773,425
Construction Change Order Allowance 2,677,342
Subtotal $29,450,767
City Procured Materials (turf, modular restroom, etc.) 1,126,346 Other Construction Costs (permits, etc.) 104,365
CWA Administration (by TSG Enterprises) 47,696
Construction Management/Inspection (by City Staff) 778,727 Construction Administration (by RRM) 398,960
Subtotal $2,456,094
Total Project Construction Cost to Completion $31,906,861 *Cents have been rounded to the nearest dollar in this table.
Project funding for construction includes $6,000,000 from The Gwendolyn Strong Foundation, a $1.5 million Community Priority Funding grant secured by Congressman Carbajal, $6 million in previously appropriated Measure C funds, the recent debt issuance of $13 million approved by the City Council, and a $5 million pledge from Ty Warner. Total Project construction costs exceed the amount of existing appropriations currently available ($26.5M). Staff is considering possible additional financing, donations, and future Measure C appropriations to close the approximately $400,000 budget gap.
Council Agenda Report
Fourth Contract Amendment with RRM Design Group for Final Design and Construction Documents for the Dwight Murphy Field Renewal Project [Agreement] October 7, 2025
SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:
The Project will further the City’s sustainability goals through incorporating environmentally responsible design and construction techniques including, the specification of recycled content building materials, construction debris recycling, addition of electric vehicle chargers, and the use of native and drought tolerant landscaping.
A copy of the contract amendment may be requested from the Public Works Department for public review. Please contact [email protected] to request a copy.
PREPARED BY: Justin Van Mullem, Capital Projects Supervisor Jill Zachary, Parks and Recreation Director
SUBMITTED BY: Brian D’Amour, Public Works Director
APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: October 7, 2025
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: City Attorney’s Office
SUBJECT: Replacement Subordination Agreement and Loan Amendment for Housing Authority Project Located at 3055 De La Vina Street [Agreement]
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council authorize the City Administrator to execute a Subordination Agreement with Banc of California with respect to a senior loan in a not-to-exceed amount of $18,000,000 to the Housing Authority for construction of the affordable housing project at 3055 De La Vina Street and an amendment to Loan Agreement to substitute the Banc of California loan as the senior indebtedness under City Loan Agreement No. 28,471, as approved as to form by the City Attorney.
DISCUSSION:
In January 2024, the City Council approved a $6,000,000 loan to the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Barbara (HACSB) to help fund acquisition of the former 34-room hotel that sits on a 24,393-square-foot lot (0.56 acres) known as the Quality Inn located at the intersection of De La Vina Street and State Street. On March 15, 2024, the City and HACSB entered into a Loan Agreement in the original principal amount of $6,000,000, which is recorded as Document No. 2024-0007761 of Official Records of the County of Santa Barbara. At the same time, the City executed a Subordination Agreement with the Santa Barbara Foundation, which had made a $1,500,000 senior loan to the Housing Authority for the project. In connection with the City Loan, the Housing Authority also executed an Affordability Control Covenant Imposed on Real Property, which is recorded as Document No. 2024-0007760. The Affordability Covenant assures that the project remains affordable to Extremely Low-Income households for a period of 90 years.
Agenda Item No. 11
File Code No. 660.04
Council Agenda Report
Replacement Subordination Agreement and Loan Amendment for Housing Authority Project Located at 3055 De La Vina Street [Agreement]
October 7, 2025
HACSB is in the process of securing the additional funds for implementation and construction of the project, which includes a construction loan from Banc of California (BOC) as a senior loan. The BOC loan will be converted to a fixed term loan on completion of construction. The BOC loan will be in an amount not-to-exceed $18,000,000. The loan from the Santa Barbara Foundation will be repaid and extinguished from the proceeds of the new financing. The City’s loan will remain as a junior loan, which requires an amendment of the City Loan Agreement to identify the BOC loan as the senior indebtedness under the Loan Agreement between the City and HACSB and a new subordination agreement between the City and BOC. The repayment provisions of the City loan will remain unchanged; however, because the BOC loan amount is larger than the Santa Barbara Foundation loan, it may take longer for the City’s loan to be repaid.
CONCLUSION
The Housing Authority has an excellent record of providing successful, innovative, efficient, and aesthetically pleasing projects that provide permanent housing opportunities to community members who would otherwise be unable to secure affordable housing. Their agency has been a valuable partner with the City on many projects in the past and has delivered exceptional projects on time and within budget for well over 50 years. Council’s approval of the recommended action is necessary for continued implementation of this project.
PREPARED BY: Daniel S. Hentschke, Assistant City Attorney SUBMITTED BY: Sarah J. Knecht, City Attorney
APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: October 7, 2025
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Approval of Mills Act Historic Property Tax Reduction Contracts RECOMMENDATION: That Council:
A. Grant exceptions to the Mills Act contract threshold for assessed property valuation, pursuant to Santa Barbara Municipal Code §30.157.145.C.4.m., for the following historic properties:
1. 20 East Los Olivos Street (APN 025-242-004);
2. 18 Calle Alamo (APN 053-332-001);
3. 234 Canon Drive (APN 053-171-006);
B. Grant renewals of the Mills Act contracts for the following historic properties:
1. 212 West Valerio Street (APN 027-091-012);
2. 2012 Anacapa Street (APN 025-321-012); and
C. Authorize the Community Development Director to execute the three new Mills Act historic property contracts and to renew the two existing contracts.
BACKGROUND:
The Mills Act is a state law enacted in 1972 that allows owners of historic properties to enter into a contractual, recorded agreement with its municipality to preserve, maintain, and rehabilitate the structure. A Mills Act contract with the City requires the property owner to propose and itemize a ten-year rehabilitation plan to improve, maintain, and repair the property. In exchange, the property owner receives a significant reduction in local property taxes.
The City Council adopted the City’s Mills Act program on September 22, 2009, codified as Santa Barbara Municipal Code (SBMC) Section 22.22.160 (now SBMC Section 30.157.145 Incentives for Preserving Historic Resources; Mills Act). When City Council revised the Program Rules and Procedures on December 10, 2019, they raised the property value Agenda Item No. 12
File Code No. 610.05
Council Agenda Report
Approval of Mills Act Historic Property Tax Reduction Contracts October 7, 2025
threshold eligible for Historic Landmarks Commission (HLC) approval and limited the City’s annual revenue loss to $260,000.
As specified in the Program Rules and Procedures, in order to enter into a Mills Act contract, the subject property or structure must be a designated City Landmark, Structure of Merit, or contributing resource to a Landmark or Historic District. The program allows the HLC to approve contracts under a property value threshold of $2.5 million for single-family residential and $3 million for multi-family/commercial properties. If the property value exceeds the threshold, Council must approve an exception. In addition, Council must review and approve requests for renewals of Mills Act contracts for an additional ten years based on a revised scope of work required to maintain the property.
DISCUSSION:
On August 13, 2025, HLC reviewed nine Mills Act applications, three of which exceeded the property value limit and require exceptions from City Council. Two of the application requests were for ten-year contract renewals, also requiring Council approval. HLC reviewed the scopes of work of the properties listed below to ensure they will restore and maintain the important historic resources and recommended that City Council approve the requests for exceptions to the property value thresholds and the contract renewals (Attachment 1 – Historic Landmarks Commission Minutes, Attachment 2 – Historic Significance Reports). The planned rehabilitation of these properties makes them excellent candidates for Mills Act contracts (Attachment 3 – Ten-Year Rehabilitation Plans). Even if the contracts are executed, there is still ample opportunity for other property owners to apply for the Mills Act Incentive Program as the City has not reached the program’s maximum annual revenue investment.
Address Type of Property Property
Valuation
Request
20 East Los Olivos Street Single Family Residential $4,130,000 Exception 18 Calle Alamo Single Family Residential $3,300,000 Exception 234 Canon Drive Single Family Residential $4,046,469 Exception 212 West Valerio Street Single Family Residential $1,852,838 Renewal 2012 Anacapa Street Single Family Residential $2,735,594 Renewal BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Before the Community Development Director may execute the requested contracts, Council must grant exceptions for the assessed property values that exceed the $2.5 million (singlefamily residential) / $3 million (multi-family/commercial) threshold.
The City has executed 83 Mills Act contracts since adoption of the program in 2009. This year, one owner of a property that completed their ten-year scope of work chose not to Council Agenda Report
Approval of Mills Act Historic Property Tax Reduction Contracts October 7, 2025
renew their contract. If Council approves the current request, the total number of Mills Act contracts will increase to 89, including two renewals and seven new agreements.
The estimated financial impacts of the Mills Act contracts on the General Fund are as follows:
The existing 83 contracts reduce annual property tax revenue by approximately $139,000.
The seven new contracts proposed in 2025 would reduce annual property tax revenue by an additional $12,000.
In total, the 89 contracts would represent an annual reduction in property tax revenue of approximately $151,000, which remains well below the program’s $260,000 annual limit.
The dollar value of the City’s investment in preserving historic resources through the Mills Act Program will vary over time. Incremental changes in the number of executed contracts and assessed property values are expected to gradually increase the associated reduction in property tax revenue.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The approval of a Mills Act contract does not authorize any new development or construction of new buildings, nor does it authorize any new land uses. The terms of City Mills Act contracts require the owners to undertake the rehabilitation work in a manner that is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings; therefore, the act of approving a Mills Act contract is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15331 Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
Copies of the proposed Mills Act contracts are available for public review; to request a copy, contact Nicole Hernandez, Architectural Historian, at [email protected] or 805-564-5336.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Historic Landmarks Commission Minutes of August 13, 2025
2. Historic Significance Reports of the Historic Properties
3. Rehabilitation Plans Including Scopes of Work
PREPARED BY: Nicole Hernandez, Architectural Historian
SUBMITTED BY: Allison DeBusk, Interim Community Development Director APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
City of Santa Barbara
HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION
MINUTES
AUGUST 13, 2025
1:30 P.M.
David Gebhard Public Meeting Room
630 Garden Street
SantaBarbaraCA.gov
COMMISSION MEMBERS:
Anthony Grumbine, Chair
Robert Ooley, Vice Chair
Keith Butler
Dennis Doordan
Michael Drury
Cass Ensberg
Ed Lenvik
Sheila Lodge
Charles McClure
ADVISORY MEMBER: Dr. Glenn Russell
CITY COUNCIL LIAISON: Kristen Sneddon
PLANNING COMMISSION LIAISON: Donald
DeLuccio
STAFF:
Tava Ostrenger, Assistant City Attorney
Ted Hamilton-Rolle, Acting Design Review
Supervisor
Nicole Hernandez, Architectural Historian
Heidi Reidel, Assistant Planner
Jasper Carman, Commission Secretary
CALL TO ORDER
The Full Commission meeting was called to order at 1:30 p.m. by Chair Grumbine.
ATTENDANCE
Commissioners present: Grumbine, Ooley, Butler, Doordan, Drury, Ensberg (at 1:32 p.m.), Lenvik, and Lodge
Commissioners absent: McClure
Staff present: Hernandez (until 3:16 p.m.); Sebastian Herics, Assistant Planner; and Carman
GENERAL BUSINESS
A. Public Comment:
Written correspondence from Sharon Hill was acknowledged.
B. Approval of the minutes of the Historic Landmarks Commission meeting of July 30, 2025.
Motion: Approve the minutes of the Historic Landmarks Commission meeting of July 30, 2025, as amended.
Action: Ooley / Drury, 7/0/1. (Ooley abstained. McClure absent.) Motion carried.
C. Approval of the minutes of the Historic Landmarks Commission Consent meeting of July 30, 2025.
ATTACHMENT 1
Historic Landmarks Commission Minutes August 13, 2025 Page 2 of 6 Motion: Approve the minutes of the Historic Landmarks Commission Consent meeting of July 30, 2025, as submitted.
Action: Drury / Ooley, 7/0/1. (Ooley abstained. McClure absent.) Motion carried.
D. Ratification of action taken on the Consent Calendar of August 13, 2025.
Consent Calendar August 13, 2025:
REVIEW TYPE & ADDRESS APN/PLN/ZONE OWNER/APPLICANT ACTION
1. Courtesy Review
112 W Cabrillo Blvd
APN: 033-101-013
PLN: 2025-00246
Zone: HRC-1 /
SD-3
County of Santa Barbara,
Kirk Lagerquist,
Representative Member /
Taylor Waters, Omgivning
Comments made.
2. Project Design Approval
340 E Los Olivos St
APN: 025-261-004
PLN: 2024-00443
Zone: RS-15
James Charles Lee /
Brooke VanDuyne, Sherry
& Associates Architects
Project Design
Approval with
comments and
findings.
3. Project Design Approval and
Final Approval
2025 Plaza Bonita
APN: 025-281-034
PLN: 2025-00298
Zone: RS-15
Jakobsen Residence
Trust, Amy and Tom
Jakobson, Trustees /
Susan Sherwin, HSA
Studio Inc.
Project Design
Approval and Final
Approval with
findings.
Motion: Ratify the Consent Calendar of August 13, 2025, as reviewed by Vice Chair Ooley.
Action: Ooley / Drury, 8/0/0. (McClure absent.) Motion carried.
E. Announcements, requests by applicants for continuances and withdrawals, future agenda items, and appeals:
Commissioner Lodge discussed the flowers in the design of the mural above the door at the Faulkner Gallery at the Santa Barbara Public Library.
F. Subcommittee Reports:
Commissioner Ensberg reported on the State Street Interim Working Group.
Vice Chair Ooley reported on the Designation Subcommittee. (1:45PM) ARCHAEOLOGY REPORT
1. 3845 STATE ST
Assessor's Parcel Number: 051-010-008
Zone: C-G/USS
Application Number: PLN2025-00238
Owner: Riviera Dairy Products
Owen Riparetti, Representative Member
Applicant: Dave Eadie, Kennedy Wilson
Historic Landmarks Commission Minutes August 13, 2025 Page 3 of 6 (Project is not located within a historic district and the parcel does not contain a historic resource. The proposed project is for demolition of two existing commercial structures (former Sears store and auto center) and surrounding parking areas located at 3845 State Street (a portion of La Cumbre Plaza) and construction of a 443-unit rental housing development under the City’s Average Unit-Size Density (AUD) Incentive Program and SB330. A Tentative Parcel Map is proposed to divide the 14.19 net acre legal lot into two parcels, creating a 9.39 net acre site for the new development while the existing development would remain on the other parcel. The project would include 31 studio, 189 one-bedroom, 200 two-bedroom, and 23 three-bedroom units in two four-story buildings. A total of 477 vehicle parking spaces in a combination of surface, tuck under, and structured parking would be provided; and 443 bicycle parking spaces would be provided. The project also includes an approximately 10,000 square foot, one-story leasing and amenities building; courtyards and other common outdoor areas provide open yard areas for residents. Sidewalks and improvements to existing access points and a multi-use path along Arroyo Burro Creek on the eastern side of the property are proposed. Site grading in the amount of approximately 46,500 cubic yards of cut and approximately 4,600 cubic yards of fill are proposed. The project is proposed to be constructed in two phases.) Requesting acceptance of a Phase I Archaeological Resources Report, prepared by Rincon Consultants, Inc. Dr. Russell reviewed the report and agrees with its conclusions and recommendations.
Actual time: 1:41 p.m.
Present: Ken Victorino, Rincon Consultants and Patsy Price, Contract Planner.
Public comment opened at 1:46 p.m., and as no one wished to speak, it closed.
Motion: Accept the Phase I Archaeological Resources Report as submitted.
Action: Ooley / Butler, 8/0/0. (McClure absent.) Motion carried. (1:55PM) MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
2. 825 W PEDREGOSA ST
Assessor's Parcel Number: 043-151-003
Zone: R-2
Reference Number: PLN2025-00008
Owner: Declaration of Trust of Kathryn Gordon and Joseph Bolger Kathryn Gordon and Joseph Bolger, Trustees
Staff: Nicole Hernandez, Architectural Historian
(Request to adopt resolution 2025-12 designating the Tudor Revival style residence, constructed in 1930, a historic Structure of Merit.)
Actual time: 1:50 p.m.
Present: Nicole Hernandez, Architectural Historian.
Public comment opened at 1:55 p.m.,
The following individual spoke:
Historic Landmarks Commission Minutes August 13, 2025 Page 4 of 6
1. Kathryn Gordon
Public comment closed at 1:57 p.m.
Motion: Adopt resolution 2025-12 designating the Tudor Revival style residence at 825 West Pedregosa Street as a Structure of Merit.
Action: Ooley / Butler, 8/0/0. (McClure absent.) Motion carried. (2:05PM) MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
3. MILLS ACT CONTRACT APPLICATIONS
Reference Number: PLN2025-00008
Staff: Nicole Hernandez, Architectural Historian
(Review of proposed Mills Act Program Ten-Year Rehabilitation Plans and recommend to the Community Development Director to approve the Mills Act contracts for the properties listed below.
The proposed ten-year rehabilitation plans meet the criteria outlined in Municipal Code Section
30.157.145 and have been recommended for HLC review by the HLC Designation Subcommittee at their meeting on August 5, 2025.)
Actual time: 2:01 p.m.
Present: Nicole Hernandez, Architectural Historian.
Public comment opened at 2:05 p.m., and as no one wished to speak, it closed.
Motion: The Commission recommends that the Community Development Director approve the Mills Act Contracts for the Structures of Merit at 804 Moreno Road, 238 Canon Drive, 615 East Valerio Street, 327 West Figueroa Street, and 1740 Overlook Lane.
Action: Ooley / Doordan, 8/0/0. (McClure absent.) Motion carried. (2:20PM) MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
4. MILLS ACT CONTRACT APPLICATIONS
Reference Number: PLN2025-00008
Staff: Nicole Hernandez, Architectural Historian
(Review of proposed Mills Act Program Ten-Year Rehabilitation Plans and recommend to City Council to grant an exception to the Mills Act contract limits outlined in Santa Barbara Municipal Code Section
30.157.145 and recommend that the Community Development Director approve the Mills Act contracts for the properties listed below. The proposed ten-year rehabilitation plans meet the criteria outlined in Municipal Code Section 30.157.145 and have been recommended for HLC review by the HLC Designation Subcommittee at their meeting on August 5, 2025.) Actual time: 2:11 p.m.
Present: Nicole Hernandez, Architectural Historian.
Historic Landmarks Commission Minutes August 13, 2025 Page 5 of 6 Public comment opened at 2:13 p.m., and as no one wished to speak, it closed.
Motion: The Commission recommends that the Mills Act Contract Applications for 20 East Los Olivos Street, 18 Calle Alamo, and 234 Canon Drive be referred to City Council for contract limit exceptions, and the applications at 212 West Valerio Street and 2012 Anacapa Street be referred to City Council for contract renewals.
Action: Lenvik / Ensberg, 8/0/0. (McClure absent.) Motion carried. * THE COMMISSION RECESSED FROM 2:16 TO 2:21 P.M. *
(2:35PM) CONTINUED ITEM: PROJECT DESIGN APPROVAL AND FINAL APPROVAL
5. 509 STATE ST
Assessor's Parcel Number: 037-172-009
Zone: M-C
Application Number: PLN2025-00310
Owner: SB 509 State LLC
Louis Silverman, Representative Member
Applicant: Beth Saracino, WJCA, Inc.
(Listed on the Historic Resources Inventory as a contributing historic resource in El Pueblo Viejo Landmark District, Part I. Proposal for new patio pendant lights and string lights to replace existing, as well as a new mosaic tile wall. Upon the Historic Landmarks Commission's approval of the Minor Alteration Findings, the project qualifies for an exemption from further environmental review under Section 15301 [Existing Facilities] of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.) Project Design Approval and Final Approval are requested. Project Compatibility Findings and Minor Alterations Findings are required. Project was referred to Full Commission at the July 30, 2025 Consent hearing.
Actual time: 2:21 p.m.
Present: Linda Osmundsen, Senior Manager of Development for Ghirardelli Chocolate..
Staff comments: Mr. Herics stated that in response to received public comment staff confirmed with the city attorney that the mosaics in the entryway are considered to be murals, instead of a sign, under the sign ordinance. Due to this designation, the Commission only has purview over their size and location.
Public comment opened at 2:30 p.m., and as no one wished to speak, it closed.
Written correspondence from Steve Hausz was acknowledged.
Straw vote: How many Commissioners can support the string lighting? 5/3 Passed Motion: Continue indefinitely with the following comments:
1. Consider the Commission’s recommendations.
2. Reduce the size of the mural.
3. The Commission supports the lights as presented.
Action: Ooley / Drury, 8/0/0. (McClure absent.) Motion carried.
Historic Landmarks Commission Minutes August 13, 2025 Page 6 of 6 (3:05PM) NEW ITEM: PROJECT DESIGN APPROVAL AND FINAL APPROVAL
6. 15 E ORTEGA ST
Assessor's Parcel Number: 037-092-014
Zone: C-G
Application Number: PLN2024-00256
Owner: 710 State St Partners
James Rafferty, Representative Member
Applicant: James Rafferty, The Press Room
(Located in El Pueblo Viejo Landmark District, Part I. Proposed parklet in the public right-of-way in front of the existing commercial building.)
Project Design Approval and Final Approval are requested. Project Compatibility Findings are required.
Actual time: 3:18 p.m.
Present: Patrick Housh, Paul Poirier & Associates Architects.
Public comment opened at 3:21 p.m.,
The following individuals spoke:
1. Steve Fort
2. Gareth Kelly
3. Darcy Roberts
Written correspondence from Steve Fort was acknowledged.
Public comment closed at 3:25 p.m.
Motion: Continue two weeks for return to Full Commission with the following comments:
1. The Commission thanks the applicant for their presentation and work, believes this is an improvement from the existing parklet and is moving in the right direction according to current city guidelines.
2. The half umbrella is not appropriate in the El Pueblo Viejo for a shade structure, and must be a full umbrella. The color must match or be complementary to the existing awning, be a simple design, and cannot feature crenellations.
3. Verify compliance with public works requirements, specifically the curb cut.
4. Return with side wall design featuring vertical planks instead of horizontal.
5. Traffic barriers to be painted or wrapped in a solid color, preferably white, though other appropriate colors could be considered.
Action: Drury / Ooley, 8/0/0. (McClure absent.) Motion carried. * MEETING ADJOURNED AT 3:51 P.M. *
20 East Los Olivos Street
HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION
HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE REPORT
20 East Los Olivos
Santa Barbara, California
Prepared by Nicole Hernandez, MFA,
City Architectural Historian
May, 2025
Designation Status: Designated a
Structure of Merit by the Historic
Landmarks Commission on June
4, 2025
Assessor Parcel Number: 025-
242-004
Constructed: 1924 (from Building
Permit) First residents listed at this
address are in 1926-27 City
Directory are: Mrs. Elizabeth
Kempffer and BM Phelps.
Architect: Unknown
Architectural Style: Spanish
Colonial Revival
Property Type: Residence
Original Use: Residence
Period of Significance: 1924
Photos taken by Nicole Hernandez on April
22, 2025
ATTACHMENT 2
20 East Los Olivos Street
Introduction:
This historic significance report has been prepared at the property owners' request for submission to the Historic Landmarks Commission, seeking designation of the property as a Historic Structure of Merit.
Previous Studies and Assessments:
The property has not been previously evaluated for historic significance. There was a reconnaissance survey completed in 1980 with no conclusions on the property through the City of Santa Barbara Architectural and Historic Resources Survey.
Environmental Setting: The neighborhood surrounding the project parcel is defined in the City of Santa Barbara General Plan as the Upper East Neighborhood. It encompasses the area between Mission Creek and Las Encinas Road to the north, Sola Street to the south, Laguna Street, Olive Avenue and Olive Street to the east and State Street to the west. With the exception of commercial development along State Street, the Upper East neighborhood is a residential district characterized by large, prestigious homes. Residential development along the 0 block of East Los Olivos Street is characterized by substantially sized, single-family houses set on large lots. The 1931 Sanborn Map indicates this was the first house on this side of East Los Olivos on the block with only one house on the opposite side of the street developed. The street is characterized by a sidewalk separated by a large tree strip between the sidewalk and street, large street trees and landscaped front yards.
Property Description: This two-story Spanish Colonial Revival style structure has a ‘U’ shaped plan.
The varying roof volumes include intersecting hipped and gabled roofs covered in terra cotta tiles.
The house features a large, stucco chimney on the east side elevation. The house has copper gutters under the narrow eaves. The extended portion of the roof over the front entrance is supported by large triangular corbels. The walls are covered in smooth stucco. The front entrance is accessed from a recessed, raised Saltillo tile uncovered porch. The wood divided light front door is flanked by two side lights with horizontally divided lights. Facing the uncovered porch on each side of the wings are identical, divided light wood doors. There are a variety of original wood windows on the house that include; two windows flanking the front entrance that are large single-hung, wood windows with matching, decorative, leaded glass windows in the top sash and four divided light windows in the bottom sash. The symmetrical façade has two projecting side wings covered with hipped roofs that have identical tryptic wood windows with large single pane glass flanked by double hung windows that have decorative, leaded glass in the top sash. Centered directly above the front entrance is another tryptic window with large single pane glass flanked by wood, double hung one-over-one windows with ogee lugs in the top sash. Other windows include sets of wood, double hung one-over-one windows with ogee lugs in the top sash and wood, single pane casement wood windows. The rear elevation has sets of divided light doors and large wood pergola over the tile rear porch. 20 East Los Olivos Street
There is a hipped roof, stucco sided garage
in the rear of the property with ogee lugs in
the corners of the door opening and wood
garage doors.
There is a low stucco wall with an iron
pedestrian gate along the front property line.
Sanborn Map Company. "Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps". City of Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara County, CA, 1930-31
Volume 2. New York: Sanborn Map Company. Pg. 239.
Illustrating the two-story ‘U’ shape was the original
footprint of the building and the first building on this side of the block.
Arial view from Google Earth
December 2022.
20 East Los Olivos Street
Above: the Birdseye view map of 1898, illustrating area as undeveloped and rural.
20 East Los Olivos Street
Historic Context: Beginning in the
first decade of the twentieth century
and accelerating in the postwar
World War I period, the area
between Constance Avenue and
Mission Street began to develop as a
residential neighborhood. Much of
the impetus for the development of
the neighborhood was due to
improvements in the City's streetcar
system. By 1913 streetcar lines linked
both Oak Park and the Upper East
to downtown Santa Barbara. One of
the lines was at State Street at Islay
Street. The presence of convenient
transportation to the downtown area
and the growing popularity of the
automobile made the outlying neighborhoods increasingly attractive to the City's residents. Close enough to downtown for work, shopping, social and civic activities, but far enough removed from its less desirable sections, which often included stables, rail yards and saloons, these outlying neighborhoods appealed to the prosperous working and middle class residents of Santa Barbara. The first residence built between Mission Street and Constance Avenue along State Street was a modest one-story, Craftsmen style house, built in 1914 located at 2117 State Street.
By 1914, State Street above Mission was unpaved and undeveloped, but had been subdivided. Real estate developers were preparing to build on the new subdivisions on either side of State Street and wanted the street to be paved. As early as November 1914, at a City Council meeting, a representative of the property owners above Mission Street, requested permission to pave state Street from Mission Street to Constance Avenue since it would be more cost effective that the City paving the street.
Another one of the first houses built in this section of State Street was completed 1915 at 2426 State Street in the Craftsman style and its neighbor completed in 1916 at 2410 State Street in the Shingle style. Most of in the Upper East Side were built in typical early 20th century styles including, Craftsman, 20 East Los Olivos Street
Spanish Colonial, American Colonial and Tudor
Revival styles. In Santa Barbara, the Spanish
Colonial Revival style was one of the dominant
residential designs during this period. Largely
inspired by the architecture of Spain and its
colonies, the Spanish Colonial Revival style was
a regional manifestation of the period revival
movement. By the early 1930s, at the onset of
the Great Depression, residential growth in
Santa Barbara, as in the rest of the nation, ended
almost entirely.
Spanish Colonial Revival Style: In 1916,
Bertram Goodhue, author of a book on Spanish
Colonial architecture, helped to kick-start the
new Spanish style with his designs for the
Panama California Expo in San Diego. Until
then, the only Spanish themed architecture
mimicked Mission prototypes. Soon, however,
architects and patrons began to look to Spain
itself for detailed examples of the Spanish style.
Throughout the territories initially settled by the
Spanish in the Southwest, as well as Texas and
Florida, the Spanish Colonial Revival flourished.
Santa Barbara had many
architects including George
Washington Smith, Lutah
Maria Riggs, Winsor Soule,
Reginald Johnson, William
Edwards, and Joseph Plunkett
talented in designing in the
style. Another key to the
success of the Spanish Colonial
Revival in Santa Barbara was
the Plans and Planting
Committee through which
Bernhard Hoffman, Pearl
Chase and others helped to
sway Santa Barbara towards a
more unified architectural style
based on the City’s Spanish
Colonial and Mexican past.
20 East Los Olivos Street
Significance: City of Santa Barbara establishes historical significance as provided by the Municipal Code, Section 30.157.025. Any historic building that meets one or more of the criteria established for a contributing historic resource within the El Pueblo Viejo Landmark District per the following criteria:
Criteria 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, architectural style or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic or historic value, or represents a significant and distinguishable collection whose individual components may lack distinction.
The building embodies the distinctive characteristics of the Spanish Colonial Revival style designed in 1924. The Spanish Colonial Revival style emphasized the interplay of cubic volumes, patios, pergolas and verandas; each interpreted and redefined by local architects or regions in their own oeuvre of the form, massing, and decorative treatments. This structure has the following character-defining features:
• Roof: The house features
low-pitched, intersecting
hipped and gable roofs
covered in terra cotta tiles.
• Wall Materials: The
Spanish Colonial Revival
style building features
smooth, whitewashed,
planar, stucco walls, with
the emphasis on broad,
uninterrupted wall
surfaces punctuated by
careful use of openings
recessed into the stucco.
• Chimneys: The stucco
chimneys is tower like
elements on the east side
elevation.
• Doors: The wood divided
light front door features sidelights with horizontally divided lights. There are two doors facing the front patio that are wood divided light as well. The rear doors are all divided-light doors • Window: There are a variety of original wood windows on the house that include Flanking the front entrance are large single-hung, wood window with matching, decorative, leaded glass windows in the top sash and four divided light windows in the bottom sash. The symmetrical façade has two projecting side wings covered with hipped roofs that have identical tryptic wood windows with large single pane glass flanked by double hung windows that have decorative, leaded glass in the top sash. Centered directly above the front entrance is another tryptic window with large single pane glass flanked by wood, double hung one-over-one windows with ogee lugs in the top sash. Other windows include sets of wood, double hung one-over-one windows with ogee lugs in the top sash and wood, single pane casement wood windows.
20 East Los Olivos Street
• Open Patio: The uncovered patio on the front
facade, recessed in between the two projecting
wings is a character defining feature of the style as
it is an interplay of the cubic volumes.
Historic Integrity
The resource at 20 East Los Olivos is in excellent condition with very few exterior alterations. The front stucco
retaining wall was added in 1993. In 2017, there were minor alterations to the rear elevation including the addition of new divided light doors added and the wood pergola
structure and the garage was remodeled. The house
conveys integrity of location, design, setting, materials, feeling and association by being an example of Spanish
Colonial Revival style in Santa Barbara and can convey its 1924 appearance.
Conclusion: The resource retains high integrity and
qualifies under Criterion 3 as an excellent example of the Spanish Colonial Revival style designed in 1924.
20 East Los Olivos Street
Work Cited:
Santa Barbara City Directory: 1926-27
Horsen, Van L. Architectural and Historic
Resources Survey. September 11, 1980.
City of Santa Barbara, Planning
Division Archives.
Grumbine, Anthony. Hernandez, Nicole.
Historic Resources Design Guidelines,
Spanish Colonial Revival Style. Adopted
by City Council 2021. City of Santa
Barbara, Community Development
Department.
Post/Hazeltine Associates. Historic
Structures/Sites Report on 2112 Santa
Barbara Street. March 5, 2013. City
Of Santa Barbara Community
Development Department, Planning
Division.
Sanborn Map Company. "Sanborn Fire
Insurance Maps". City of Santa
Barbara, Santa Barbara County, CA,
1930-31 Volume 2. New York:
Sanborn Map Company. Pg. 239 and 244.
HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION
HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE REPORT
18 Calle Alamo
Santa Barbara, California
Prepared by Nicole Hernandez, MFA,
City Architectural Historian
November 14, 2024
Designation Status: Designated a Structure of
Merit by HLC vote January 15, 2025
Assessor Parcel Number: 053-332-001
Constructed: 1927
Architect: Edwards, Plunkett and Howell
Architectural Style: Spanish Colonial Revival
Property Type: Residence
Original Use: Residence
Property Description: This one-story Spanish
Colonial Revival style structure with an irregular
plan. The varying roof volumes include hipped and
gabled roof, and a hipped roof over the northeast
portion. The roof is shake roof with terra-cotta
ridge tiles as was specified in the original
drawings. The house features a chimney with
double pointed arches in the center of the house
with four terra cotta vents along the roofline.
Small wood brackets support the narrow eaves.
The walls are covered in smooth stucco. The
wood, plank front door features a small
rectangular window and pointed arch at the top
and sits under a massive point arch entry way over
the brick portico. The front window is a wood
tryptic
windows
with a
fixed pan
Photos taken by Nicole Hernandez on
November 12, 2024
Arial view from Google Earth
November 14, 2024.
flanked by horizontally divided casement windows.
There is a variety of original wood windows on the
house that include a large, divided light, arched, fixed window in and horizontally divided casement
windows and eight-by-eight casement windows. The
rear doors are horizontally divided light windows.
There is a stucco wall enclosing the rear garden with
an arch for the garden opening.
There is a hipped roof, small stucco sided garden
shed and garage both with a tower like cupula in the
center of the hipped roofs. That garage was included
in the original drawings.
Significance: City of Santa Barbara establishes
historical significance as provided by the Municipal
Code, Section 30.157.025. Any historic building that
meets one or more of the criteria established for a
contributing historic resource within the El Pueblo
Viejo Landmark District per the following criteria:
Criteria 3. It embodies the distinctive
characteristics of a type, period, architectural
style or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic or historic value, or represents a significant and distinguishable collection whose individual components may lack distinction.
Historic Context: In 1916, Bertram Goodhue, author of a book on Spanish Colonial architecture, helped to kick-start the new Spanish style with his designs for the Panama California Expo in San Diego. Until then, the only Spanish themed architecture mimicked Mission prototypes. Soon, however, architects and patrons began to look to Spain itself for detailed examples of the Spanish style. Throughout the territories initially settled by the Spanish in the Southwest, as well as Texas and Florida, the Spanish Colonial Revival flourished. Santa Barbara had many architects including George Washington Smith, Lutah Maria Riggs, Winsor Soule, Reginald Johnson, William Edwards, and Joseph Plunkett talented in designing in the style. Another key to the success of the Spanish Colonial Revival in Santa Barbara was the Plans and Planting Committee through which Bernhard Hoffman, Pearl Chase and others helped to sway Santa Barbara towards a more unified architectural style based on the City’s Spanish Colonial and Mexican past.
The building sits in the San Roque neighborhood.
The San Roque neighborhood was once the
Ranch of Dixey Thompson, who raised beans and
walnuts on the ranch. Thompson’s ranch flanking
San Roque Canyon remained open agricultural
land until the first subdivisions began developing
around World War I. Stephen Rutherford bought
123 acres in 1927 between San Roque Road and
Alamar Avenue. The San Roque portion of the
ranch was developed in patchwork fashion
between the two World Wars. San Roque was half
built out by 1940. The rest of the home sites were
filled between 1955 and 1965. As an excellent
example of original Spanish Colonial Revival style
commercial building that is essential to the
identity of Santa Barbara.
The Spanish Colonial Revival style emphasized
the interplay of cubic volumes, patios, pergolas
and verandas; each interpreted and redefined by
local architects or regions in their own oeuvre of
the form, massing, and decorative treatments.
This structure has the following characterdefining features:
• Roof: The house features lowpitched, hipped-and gable and hipped roofs covered in shake
tiles with terra-cotta ridge tiles.
• Wall Materials: The Spanish
Colonial Revival style building
features smooth,
whitewashed, planar, stucco
walls, with the emphasis on
broad, uninterrupted wall
surfaces punctuated by careful
use of openings.
• Chimneys: Stucco chimneys
are tower like elements with decorative openings with that are both practical and ornamental.
The double pointed arch stucco chimney reflects the same pointed arch surround of the entrance and wood plank door.
• Doors: The wood, plank front door features a small rectangular window and pointed arch at the top and sits under a massive point arch entry way over the brick portico. The rear doors are horizontally divided light windows.
• Window: The front window
is a wood tryptic windows
with a fixed pan flanked by
horizontally divided
casement windows. There is
a variety of original wood
windows on the house that
include a large divided light,
arched, fixed window in and
horizontally divided
casement windows and eightby-eight casement windows.
• Arch opening: The garage
features a rounded arch
opening. The garden wall
also features the rounded
arch opening.
Edwards, Plunkett
and Howell
William Edwards was born on May 4,
1888 in Santa Barbara, then a small
town with Victorian buildings and
horse-drawn streetcars. He attended the
University of California at Berkeley,
then transferred to the University of
Pennsylvania where he received a degree
in architecture in 1912. He opened his
Santa Barbara office in 1919 and
practiced alone until the disastrous
earthquake of 1925. On that day he
formed a partnership with Joseph
Plunkett, a master of design and
rendering.
Plunkett was born in Rome, New York, in 1900. He entered Syracuse State University in 1919.
During his junior year in 1922, he and some friends took a trip to California. Plunkett never returned east and never completed his degree. Instead, he associated himself with an architect in Santa Maria, where he engaged in design work for the Santa Maria Inn. Plunkett's designs are Original Drawings from the City of Sanat
Barbara Plans Archives, Community
Development Department
characterized by their remarkable
attention to detail, namely window
treatments and ornamental iron and
tile designs. After marrying in 1923,
Plunkett and his wife settled in Santa
Barbara where, following the
earthquake of 1925, he was faced with
an incredible architectural opportunity
as the city decided to rebuild and unify
Santa Barbara under the aesthetics of
the Spanish Colonial Revival style.
On the day of the Earthquake,
Edwards and Plunkett obtained a
permit to tour the rubble of the downtown area
and were immediately available to design
reconstruction. They were flooded
with commissions and were influential
in promoting the Spanish revival style
in the rebuilding of Santa Barbara.
Edwards’ talent and experience gave
the firm the technical excellence
required by the newly-formed
Architectural Board of Review. A
third partner, Henry Howell, joined
them in 1926 as the firm became fully
established as commercial architects.
Notable examples of their work then
were the Red Cross Drug Store, the
East Sola Fire Station, the Copper
Coffee Pot, and the Cold Springs
School. Howell left the firm in 1928 to
establish his own practice.
1126 Santa Barbara Street, Schauer Printing Building
by Edwards and Plunkett
Arlington Theatre by Edwards and Plunkett
Edwards and Plunkett worked together
steadily until World War II. During these
years, 1929-39, their most impressive work
was done. The Fox-Arlington Theater, J.J.
Mitchell ranch and residence in Santa Ynez,
the National Guard Armory, the Woman’s
Club, the Medical Arts Building, and the
Clarence Mitchell House are examples of their
best work during this period. The A.R.
Demory House in Santa Barbara and the E.G.
Linscott House in Hope Ranch both won
awards in the Annual Plans and Planting
Committee Competition. The eclectic quality of the
courthouse, though credited to Mosher, was
actually a combination of designs submitted by Santa Barbara’s best Spanish revival architects, including Edwards and Plunkett.
They maintained offices in the Meridian
Studios during most of their partnership.
Large commissions, such as the FoxArlington Theater and the Airport Terminal, as well as civic projects and elementary
schools, kept the firm busy during minimal
construction years of the Depression. They
dissolved their partnership in the early war
years; Edwards went north to take a
government drafting position. After the war
he returned to Santa Barbara and formed
the firm of Edwards and Wade in 1946. He
retired in 1950. His son, Peter, carried on
the family tradition of fine architecture.
Work completed by Edwards and Plunkett:
• Arlington Theatre-1317 State Street
• Santa Barbara Airport Terminal
• El Encanto Hotel
• 1806 El Encanto Road
• 1126 Santa Barbara Street, Landmark, Schauer Printing Building, 1930 • 1301 Santa Barbara Street, Structure of Merit, Auto Club of Southern California, 1931
• 1036 Anacapa Street
1301 Santa Barbara Street, Auto Club of Southern
California Building by Edwards and Plunkett
10 East Carrillo St., 1925
• 500-510 State Street, 1925
• 721 State Street, 1920
• 930 State Street, 1927
• 700 E Canon Perdido, National Guard
Armory: Main Building, Rose Garden,
1938.
• Los Arcos Building, 35 E. Ortega St.,
1925
• 6 East Arrellaga St.
• 203 Chapala Street, 7-Up Bottling
Company
• Los Banos Del Mar, 1931 (Edwards and
Howell, under firm name Edwards,
Plunkett and Howell)
• 1025 Chapala Street, 1926
• 3626 San Remo, 1927
• 10 E Canon Perdido, 1925
• 15-17 W. Carrillo, 1930
• 21 East Canon Perdido, 1927
• 405 Canon Drive, 1929
• 1515 State Street 1927 ( Under Edwards, Plunkett and Howell). • 911 Chapala Street,
• 2019 Plaza Bonita (1927)
• 312 E Pedregosa Street (1929)
• 18 Calle Alamo (1927) – Under Edwards, Plunkett and Howell. • 962 Isletta
• 113-115 W. De La Guerra St.
• 1035 State Street
• 1309 State Street
• 1315 State Street, 1926
• 1736 State Street
Historic Integrity
The resource at 18 Calle Alamo is in excellent condition with very few exterior alterations as very little has been altered from the original drawings. There are a few variances in the current condition that differ from the original drawings but it is not known if those were in the final constructed house of 1927 or altered that include: the front door does not have as elaborate hardware as drawn, the divided light rear door and some of the windows have different light patterns than drawn. The house conveys integrity of location, design, setting, materials, feeling and association by being an example of Spanish Colonial Revival style in Santa Barbara and can convey its 1927 appearance.
Los Banos Del Mar, 1931
Conclusion: The resource retains high integrity and qualifies under Criterion 3 as an excellent example of the Spanish Colonial Revival style designed by noted architects Edwards, Plunkett and Howell in 1927.
Work Cited:
Andree, Herb. Young, Noel. Hallman, Patricia. Santa Barbara Architecture. Capra Press, Santa Barbara 1995.
Closson, Richard. This Old House. “Ancestors West, Santa Barbara County Genealogy Society” Spring 2020.
Grumbine, Anthony. Hernandez, Nicole. Historic Resources Design Guidelines, Spanish Colonial Revival Style. Adopted by City Council 2021. City of Santa Barbara, Community Development Department.
Thompson, Walker A. San Roque. “Neighborhood Series No. 1.” Southern Santa Barbara County Board of Realtors. 1977.
HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION HISTORIC
SIGNIFICANCE REPORT
234 Canon Drive
Santa Barbara, California
Prepared by Nicole Hernandez, MFA,
City Architectural Historian
November 1, 2024
Designation Status: Designated a
historic Structure of Merit on
January 15, 2025 by HLC Vote
Assessor Parcel Number: 053-
171-006
Historic Name: Dr & Mrs.
Margaret E. Bacheller after original
owners
Architect: J.H. Hillock & Son
Constructed: 1934
Addition: 1940
Architectural Style: American Colonial Revival,
regional interpretation
Property Type: Residence
Original Use: Residence
Photos of 234 Canon Drive taken on
October 14, 2024 by Nicole
Hernandez.
Original 1934 drawing of façade of
building. Courtesy owner, Jamie
Montgomery
Property Description:
This two-story American
Colonial Revival style house sits
on Canon Drive along with
other period revival houses
constructed in the 1920s and
1930s. This two-story,
rectangular house has a
chimney on either side of the
side facing gable. The house
has narrow overhanging
eaves. The house features
board and batten siding the
second floor, with horizontal
wood weather boards on the
portion north of the balcony
and painted, white brick on
the first floor and on the
projecting, one-story,
portion with front facing gable to the
north. The second-floor balcony runs
2/3 of the façade of the building with a
decorative ‘x’ shape cut wood railing
with dentil molding under the
balustrade. Sets of divided light doors
open out to the balcony. The house
features six-over-six, double hung,
wood windows. which references
America’s early period when large panes of
glass were not common since they were
expensive and hard to transport without
breaking. The front door has six square
lights over the vertical panels. On
either side of the front door there are
decorative grills in the wall. The house
features flag stone steps leading to the
front door.
Historic Integrity
234 Canon Drive is in excellent
condition. There was a 1940 rear
addition which does not impact the
ability for the house to convey its 1934
appearance on the front façade. The
original drawings illustrate shutters on
the windows that are not currently on
the house, it is not known if they were never installed or removed. The house conveys integrity of location, design, setting, materials, feeling and association by being able to convey its 1934 condition as an example of American Colonial Revival style in Santa Barbara.
Historic Context: The building sits in
the San Roque neighborhood. The San
Roque neighborhood was once the
Ranch of Dixey Thompson, who raised
beans and walnuts on the ranch.
Thompson’s ranch flanking San Roque
Canyon remained open agricultural land
until the first subdivisions began
developing around World War I. Stephen
Rutherford bought 123 acres in 1927
between San Roque Road and Alamar
Avenue. The San Roque portion of the
ranch was developed in patchwork
fashion between the two World Wars.
San Roque was half built out by 1940.
The rest of the home sites were filled
between 1955 and 1965.
As shown on the 1930-31 Sanborn Map,
there were only a few houses built around
Canon Drive before 1930. There are four
houses on Canon Drive that are
designated as historic Structures of
Merit, at 224 Canon Drive designed in
1928 in the American Colonial Revival
style, 212 Canon Drive designed in 1928
in the Tudor Revival style, 405 Canon
Drive designed in 1929 by noted
architects Edwards and Plunkett in the
Spanish Colonial Revival style, and 246
Canon Drive designed in 1930 by
Leonard Cooke in the Spanish Colonial
Revival style.
The house was built as part of the San
Roque County Club, a planned
development of homes around Canon
Drive with a golf course where Ralph
Stevens Park is now. The 1926
subdivision maps show the layout of
streets, at least one of which never materialized. The
homes were required to meet construction and
design standards established by the San Roque
Canon Drive. Sanborn Map 1930-
1931 Courtesy Gledhill Library
Investment Company. A San Roque Art Jury governed all color schemes.
Significance: The building meets
the following criteria outlined in the
Santa Barbara Municipal Code
30.157.25.
Criteria 3. It embodies the
distinctive characteristics of a
type, period, architectural style
or method of construction, or
represents the work of a master,
or possesses high artistic or
historic value, or represents a
significant and distinguishable
collection whose individual
components may lack
distinction.
The two-story American Colonial
Revival style house was designed in
1934 illustrates the characterdefining features of the American Colonial Revival style. Enthused for
the 100th anniversary of nationhood,
the late 1800s saw a resurgence of
Colonial-style architecture, which
soon grew into a massive movement.
Across the nation, American
Colonial Revival became the strongest house style of the first half of the 20th century, dominating the vernacular architecture of America. Having left a lasting impression on house design, its effect on the City of Santa Barbara continues to this day.
American Colonial Revival started in 1876 at the Philadelphia Centennial. It soon began to influence two Victorian styles of architecture. A portion of the developing Queen Anne architecture became Queen Anne Free Classic, which had much of the same detailing as American Colonial Revival but the asymmetry and massing of the Queen Anne, while the Shingle style exhibited traits of early colonial shingle lean-to additions, as well as some classical detailing such as Palladian windows. As it became more popular, American Colonial Revival began to change from a style inspired by the early colonial period to a style with highly historically accurate re-creation of architecture details. Periodicals published articles that included photographs and measured drawings of various early colonial buildings.
In Santa Barbara, American Colonial Revival had a presence, but it was not as strong as in other parts of the country. This was due in part to the strength of the Mission Revival, Craftsman, and Spanish Colonial Revival styles in Santa Barbara during the early 1900s, when American Colonial Revival was popular on a national scale. The style was nevertheless a key part of Santa Barbara’s architectural repertoire. This example of Colonial Revival is unique in that is has asymmetrical massing and a balcony on the front and a variety of siding material.
The house embodies the following character-defining elements of the American Colonial Revival style:
• The simple, two-story rectangular massing with a side gable roof with a chimney on each end; • The wood, front entrance door with its six, square panes over vertical panels; • The six-over-six, wood, double-hung windows, which references America’s early period when large panes of glass were not common since they were expensive and hard to transport without breaking;
As a unique example of a 1934 American Colonial Revival style house and a house illustrative of the development of San Roque neighborhood, the house qualifies under criterion 3.
5. Its unique location or singular physical characteristic represents an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood.
The house sits on Canon Drive and because of its unique decorative balcony and unique example of an American Colonial Revival, the building is a highly visible feature in the San Roque neighborhood. Thus, the house qualifies under criterion 5 as its unique, singular characteristics make this a highly visible, established and familiar feature of the San Roque neighborhood.
Conclusion: The house qualifies as Structure of Merit under criterion 3 and 5, as a unique example American Colonial Revival style house constructed in 1934 with high historic integrity as it still retains most of its original features and conveys its original appearance.
Work Cited:
Closson, Richard. This Old House. “Ancestors West, Santa Barbara County Genealogy Society” Spring 2020.
Grumbine, Anthony, Harrison Design. Hernandez, Nicole. Santa Barbara Style Guides, American Colonial Revival. City of Santa Barbara, Community Development Department. November 2014.
Thompson, Walker A. San Roque. “Neighborhood Series No. 1.” Southern Santa Barbara County Board of Realtors. 1977.
1 HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION
Historic Significance Report
212 WEST VALERIO STREET
SANTA BARBARA, CALIFORNIA
APN 027-091-012
JULY 29, 2015
Designation Status: Designated a Structure of Merit on July 1, 2015 by HLC vote. 2 Site Plan of 212 West Valerio Street
Designation boundary is 5 feet
around the perimeter of the c. 1905
house and includes the stone wall
at the streetscape.
3 Significance
The City of Santa
Barbara establishes
historic significance as
provided by the
Municipal Code, Section
22.22.040. Any historic
building that meets one
or more of the eleven
criteria (Criteria A
through K) established
for a City Landmark or a
City Structure of Merit
can be considered
significant. The house at
212 W. Valerio Street is
significant as a Structure
of Merit per the
following criteria:
Criterion A. Its
character, interest or
value as a significant part of the heritage of the City, the State or the Nation; The structure was built c. 1905, in the Craftsman architectural style. The Craftsman style was created in reaction to loss of human craft found in the Industrial Revolution, the Arts and Crafts Movement formed in England and soon spread to the United States. It became known as the Craftsman Movement in the United States and utilized local, natural materials, simplicity of forms, originality, and hand-crafted detail. In 1901, the first issue of The Craftsman magazine was published by Gustav Stickley, a strong proponent of Craftsman furniture, textiles, and architecture. Architects such as Greene and Greene in Pasadena, and David Owen Dryden in San Diego championed the Craftsman style, helping it to become the most popular style of the early 1900’s. The Craftsman Movement embodied great variety with the Arts and Crafts English antecedents, to homes with an aesthetic reminiscent of oriental wood joinery, to the Craftsman bungalow style which ennobled modest homes for a rapidly expanding American middle class.
The typical Craftsman structure suited to a warm climate, with verandas for outdoor entertainment, wide, overhanging eaves and multiple windows to provide shade and crossventilation in the days before air conditioning. With climate and economic opportunity drawing more people westward at the same time that the Craftsman style, California is known for its abundance of Craftsman style homes.
In Santa Barbara, the Craftsman house enjoyed a popularity that can still be seen today.
From the small Bungalow to the large, almost grandiose, house, Craftsman architecture thrived in Santa Barbara. In Santa Barbara, examples of the Craftsman style can be found in the City’s older residential neighborhoods surrounding downtown, including the Upper and Lower Eastside neighborhoods and the Westside neighborhood. This architectural subtype characterizes Santa Barbara’s early twentieth century residential expansion that was largely driven by the growth in the City’s resort industry and improvements to the transportation system. Therefore, as an exceptional example of the Craftsman style that is illustrative of the growth and development of Santa Barbara’s middle class residential neighborhoods during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, the 4 house at 1925 Anacapa Street qualifies for
listing as a City of Santa Barbara Structure of
Merit under criterion A.
Criterion D, its exemplification of a
particular architectural style or way of life
important to the City, the State, or the
Nation;
The house at 212 W. Valerio Street has
a high degree of integrity that allows it to
convey its original appearance in the Craftsman
style. The house also contributes to the visual
integrity of the surrounding neighborhood,
which is primarily residential in character,
encompassing a range of architectural styles
including Folk Victorian, Queen Anne,
Craftsman, and post World War II multiresidential buildings.
The two-story house exemplifies the
Craftsman style with its character-defining
features low pitched, hipped roof and large,
exposed eaves with rafter tails that add subtle
details to the simple form. The tails themselves
are cut in a plain manner and have exposed
protruding beams to visually hold the large overhanging eaves. The house features typical Craftsman style wide, square columns on the
front porch, an oval light front door, wood
clapboard siding on the first floor and
decorative shingle siding on the second floor
and a brick chimney. The door on the second
floor front elevation is flanked by one over one,
double hung wood windows. It opens onto a front
facing balcony that has a solid wood railing of shingle siding. The side trellised porch is also a character
defining feature of the Craftsman style.
The Craftsman is one of the architectural styles
that typify this Santa Barbara neighborhood. Moreover,
the house at 212 W. Pedregosa Street is characteristic of the type of houses built for Santa Barbara’s prosperous tradesmen and middle class during the early twentieth
century. Because the house 212 W. Pedregosa Street is
an exemplary example of its architectural style, and is illustrative of the development of Santa Barbara’s
residential neighborhoods during the early twentieth
century, it is eligible for listing as a City of Santa
Barbara Structure of Merit under criterion D.
5 Criterion G, its embodiment of elements demonstrating outstanding attention to architectural design, detail, materials and craftsmanship; The two-story Craftsman house demonstrates outstanding attention to design, detail, materials and craftsmanship with its low hipped roof, shingle siding, wood windows, wide overhanging eaves and front facing front balcony. In addition, the house has an ashlar sandstone wall lining the streetscape that also demonstrates outstanding materials and craftsmanship, the house is eligible for listing as a Structure of Merit under criterion G.
Criterion I, its unique location or singular physical characteristics representing an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood; The house at 212 W. Valerio Street built c. 1905 is located on the north side of Valerio Street between De La Vina and Bath Streets. The house at 212 W. Valerio Street and its significant sandstone wall lining the streetscape have formed an established and familiar visual element of the surrounding streetscape since c. 1905 and is eligible for listing under criterion I.
Historic Integrity
The house is in good condition, with almost all of the original materials still present. In addition, the surrounding area has also maintained much of its historic integrity. The house retains its integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association that allow it to convey its original appearance.
1 2012 Anacapa Street
Designation Status: City Landmark. The Historic
Landmarks Commission designated the house a City of
Santa Barbara Landmark in 1991.
Assessor Parcel Number: 025-321-012
Constructed: 1904-1905
Historic Name: Chase House
Property Description: The approximately 2,900-square-foot, two-story wood-frame house, built in circa 1904-1905, is an example of the Four-Square type of architecture with some Queen Anne motifs.
A review of the City of Santa Barbara’s early 20th century Permit Log book, did not reveal any information regarding the designer or architect responsible for its design. It is possible that a contractor or carpenter built the house, like many others of the time, was built by a contactor or carpenter using a pattern book.
Set on a raised foundation, the house has an
essentially square footprint with a small onestory projection off the east (rear) elevation, a larger two-story projection off the west end
of the house’s south elevation and bay
windows on the north and west front
elevations. The house’s low pitched hipped
roof covered in composition shingles
features deep overhanging eaves, distinctly
flat embellished with decorative wood
brackets. The exterior of the house features
two siding types, with narrow horizontal
wood clapboards stringcourse on the first
floor and shingles on the second floor; the
raised foundation is sheathed in vertical board siding. The house’s fenestration is primarily of oneover-one, wood, double hung windows with ogee lugs on the upper sash. Three windows on the front elevation feature fixed leaded-glass windows in the top sash. The front door sits on the north (side) elevation recessed off a small portico with a wood railing and heavy brackets supporting the 2nd story bay window above to create the distinction of the entrance.
Architect: Unknown
Builder: E. A. Smith
Architectural Style: Prairie Box/American Foursquare
Property Type: Single Family Residence
Original Use: Single Family Residence
Figure 1. Photo of street façade taken in 2019
2 Significance: City Landmark
City of Santa Barbara establishes historic significance as provided by the Municipal Code, Section
22.22.040. The building meets the following criteria:
Criterion C. Its identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the culture and development of the City, the State or the Nation:
Pearl Chase was one of the most important community activists in Santa Barbara’s history. Beginning in the first decade of the 20th century and continuing until her death in 1979, for over 60 years Pearl Chase devoted herself to the civic betterment of Santa Barbara. Many are aware of Pearl’s numerous contributions to civic improvements, the arts and historic preservation, including being one of the founding members of the Plans and Planting Committee of the Community Arts Association that promoted transforming Santa Barbara into a Spanish Colonial Revival/Mediterranean style city. She was one of the founders of the Santa Barbara Trust for Historic Preservation and one of the principals instrumental in helping to change the architectural character of Santa Barbara toward a Spanish Colonial Revival/Mediterranean style city. She had a strong interest in civic planning, including in preserving the community’s architectural heritage, and played an important role in rallying other community supporters to save the city’s remaining historic adobes. Chase supported of the City that drew its inspiration from Santa Barbara’s Californio Spanish/Mexican tradition. But what many are less aware of was her lifelong advocacies in public health and education. As was once noted, “No cause architectural, social, or environmental escaped the critical eye and sweeping vision of Pearl Chase,” (The Independent, November 8, 2001: 21)
Criterion D. Its exemplification of a particular architectural style or way of life important to the City, the State or the Nation:
The American Four-Square is one of four subtypes associated with the Builder Style, a term used to define “the crucial role that speculative developers, plan-book designers, and mail-order houses played in putting homes on the building lots of American suburbs” (Massey & Maxwell, 1996: 211). Most often non-architect designed, the Builder Style was popular between circa-1900 and 1920, and quickly faded from fashion after the First World War. In addition to the Four-Square, the Builder Style includes three other sub-types: the Homestead, the Cottage and the Bungalow. These four sub-types, with their plain finishes and simple features, employed few high-end stylistic motifs and were characterized by form rather than detail (Massey & Maxwell, 1996: 212). The Four-Square was the earliest Prairie form, an indigenous American style that originated Chicago in the last decade of the 19th century, and developed into the most common vernacular version. Examples of the Four-Square were soon seen and spread throughout the country, disseminated primarily through pattern books and shelter magazines published in the Midwest. Among the most short-lived styles, most Four-Squaredesigned buildings were built between the second and first floors to divide the different cladding materials covering each of the floors. Fenestration generally consist of groups of vertically-aligned windows; dormers or bay windows were frequently employed, sometimes on all four elevations. The buildng has the following character-defining features of the Four Square style:
• Roof and porch Details: The hipped roof with widely overhanging eaves with decorative brackets as well as the broad and flat chimneys and no front entry on the front façade. The entrance is inconspicuous on the side elevation with the façade dominated by horizontal rows of double hung windows.
Figure 2. Pearl Chase
3 • Window Details: The house features original, one-over-one, wood, double hung windows with ogee lugs on the upper sash. Three windows on the front elevation feature fixed leadedglass windows in the top sash. • Wall details: The house has a beltcourse betweent the first and second floors to divide the different cladding materials of the horizontal clappboards on the first floor and the shingle siding on the second floor.
Criterion G. Its embodiment of elements demonstrating outstanding attention to architectural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship:
The house demonstrates outstanding design, details and craftsman ship in the following features:
• Roof and porch Details: The hipped roof with widely overhanging, flat eaves with decorative brackets as well as the broad and flat chimneys and no front entry on the front façade. The entrance is inconspicuous on the side elevation with the façade dominated by horizontal rows of double hung windows.
• Window Details: The house features original, one-over-one, wood, double hung windows with ogee lugs on the upper sash. Three windows on the front elevation feature fixed leadedglass windows in the top sash. • Wall details: The house has a beltcourse
betweent the first and second floors to
divide the different cladding materials of
the horizontal clappboards on the first
floor and the shingle siding on the second
floor.
• Sandstone Wall: There is a three-course
sandstone retaining wall abutting the
sidewalk, lining the front streetscape. A
feature that gives the region such
distinction while offering a surprising and
pleasing bit of artistry. Walls usually
require far less engineering compared to
bridges, so they offer more opportunity
for stonemasons to express themselves
and their artistry in the selection, carving,
and setting of stones. Use of masonry for construction in the Santa Barbara area dates back to the time the Spanish arrived. Since it was necessary to travel some distance into the woods to obtain lumber, but rocks were found scattered on the ground, stone became the preferred building material. The tradition of building with stones continued in Santa Barbara County through the 19th century. This method of construction was often chosen because local brown sandstone was readily available and easily transformed from round or shapeless boulders into symmetrical smooth faced stone for building purposes. A local stonemason explained in July of 1883, “When a quantity of it is wanted, a blast of powder is drilled into the heart of one of the large boulders and exploded and a number of square edged building stones are produced” (Santa Barbara News-Press July 1883). Many residences, walls, bridges, and commercial structures were constructed out of local sandstone during the nineteenth and early twentieth century. Immediately after World War I, Santa Barbara began a concerted effort to revamp its visual image. During this time, city planners carefully monitored all construction of any new structure to make sure it was consistent with the master plan that was based on Spanish Colonial Revival/Mediterranean streetscape mode (Conrad and Nelson, 1986: 14). The use of Figure 3. Three-course sandstone wall and stairs
4 a traditional building material, sandstone, in the construction of the walls built during this period was in line with Santa Barbara’s planning and design efforts. In the years from 1870 to 1940, when Santa Barbara was quickly evolving into a vibrant, growing city, the period witnessed an extraordinary explosion of stone construction made possible by the abundant supply of sandstone, cadre of expert masons, and financing by private citizens. This period provided an atmosphere conductive to the building of public and private spaces of all kinds, walls, bridges, gardens, and an assortment of other stone works and encouraged some exceptional expressions of the mason’s art. Among the most apparent expressions of the beauty in stone that give the region such distinction are the stone walls.
Historic Integrity
The property has retained its integrity of location, design, setting, materials, feeling and association.
Because the property has retained its integrity, it can still convey those qualities that qualified it for listing as a City of Santa Barbara Landmark.
Works Cited
Post/Hazeltine Associates, “Historic Structures/Sites Report for 2012 Anacapa Street,” Santa Barbara, 2014.
McAlester, Virginia. McAlester, Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., 1997.
Santa Barbara Conservancy, Images of America, Stone Architecture in Santa Barbara. Arcadia Publishing, 2009
MILLS ACT PROGRAM TEN-YEAR REHABILITATION PLAN
20 East Los Olivos Street
Structure of Merit
City of Santa Barbara
Project Proposed Project
Project 1 Replace non-original windows on the house
with wood windows to match original on
front. Includes paint and scaffolding
Project 2 Garage: Cleaning of existing wood framing
with water staining, installation of closed cell
spray foam insulation in the roof rafters, new
ceiling joist to carry new drywall ceiling with
1/2" board, one attic access port and paint to
finish.
Project 3 Restore and Repair 9 doors.
Project 4 Waterproof and Repair stucco on garage.
Project 5 Foundation repair: Complete strapping of fifty posts and add shear paneling in the corners
and midspans.
To be attached to the Historic Property Preservation Agreement (Mills Act Contract) as Exhibit B.
ATTACHMENT 3
Projects may be interior or exterior, but must utilize all of the tax savings. All projects that affect the exterior of the residence are subject to Historic Landmarks Commission/Staff review and approval before work begins. Work must meet all City requirements and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Restoration Plan may be amended or altered by mutual agreement. Retain copies of all receipts and permits for submittal with the required annual reports.
MILLS ACT PROGRAM TEN-YEAR REHABILITATION PLAN
18 Calle Alamo
Structure of Merit
City of Santa Barbara
Project Proposed Project
Project 1 Replace electrical panel
Project 2 Repair/Replace Roof and Replace all Gutters
Project 3 Reinforce foundation to address structural
cracking showing on house.
Project 4 Seismic Retrofit
To be attached to the Historic Property Preservation Agreement (Mills Act Contract) as Exhibit B.
Projects may be interior or exterior, but must utilize all of the tax savings. All projects that affect the exterior of the residence are subject to Historic Landmarks Commission/Staff review and approval before work begins. Work must meet all City requirements and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Restoration Plan may be amended or altered by mutual agreement. Retain copies of all receipts and permits for submittal with the required annual reports.
MILLS ACT PROGRAM TEN-YEAR REHABILITATION PLAN
234 Canon Drive
Structure of Merit
City of Santa Barbara
Project Proposed Project
Project 1 Remove rear garage door; reconstruct wall
with period-appropriate siding and install
wood French doors for interior access.
Project 2 Backyard landscaping: Replace aging and
unsafe railroad ties with historically
sympathetic stairs and terracing. Regrade if
needed. New landscaping will be droughttolerant and compatible with the period of significance.
Project 3 Exterior Paint: Scrape and repair all exterior wood surfaces. Repaint house using existing
color.
Project 4 Original wood windows: Restore several
original wood sash windows. Repairs may
include replacing broken panes, reglazing, reroping weights, refinishing wood, and restoring operability while preserving original
materials and design.
Project 5 Interior Paint and Plaster: Repair minor
drywall and plaster cracks throughout interior,
especially around crown molding and original
woodwork. Prep and repaint rooms with
historically sensitive colors.
Project 6 Add wainscot to three rooms to match original wood paneling in entry.
To be attached to the Historic Property Preservation Agreement (Mills Act Contract) as Exhibit B.
Projects may be interior or exterior, but must utilize all of the tax savings. All projects that affect the exterior of the residence are subject to Historic Landmarks Commission/Staff review and approval before work begins. Work must meet all City requirements and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Restoration Plan may be amended or altered by mutual agreement. Retain copies of all receipts and permits for submittal with the required annual reports.
MILLS ACT PROGRAM TEN-YEAR REHABILITATION PLAN
212 West Valerio Street
Structure of Merit
City of Santa Barbara
Project Proposed Project
Project 1 Install permanent sump system in the
basement – includes cutting concrete
Project 2 Restore 12 windows
Project 3 Repair upper floor shingles
Project 4 Repair siding and repaint entire exterior of
house
Project 5 Repair/Replace exterior gutters
Project 6 HVAC – replace FAU downstairs
Project 7 Replace hardware on interior doors
Project 8 Termite Treatment (tenting house)
Project 9 Porch renovation/repair
Project 10 Electrical repairs to interior outlets and
lighting fixes
Project 11 Interior painting
To be attached to the Historic Property Preservation Agreement (Mills Act Contract) as Exhibit B.
Projects may be interior or exterior, but must utilize all of the tax savings. All projects that affect the exterior of the residence are subject to Historic Landmarks Commission/Staff review and approval before work begins. Work must meet all City requirements and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Restoration Plan may be amended or altered by mutual agreement. Retain copies of all receipts and permits for submittal with the required annual reports.
MILLS ACT PROGRAM TEN-YEAR REHABILITATION PLAN
2012 Anacapa Street
Structure of Merit
City of Santa Barbara
Project Proposed Project
Project 1 Interior and exterior painting
Project 2 Install iron pedestrian and driveway gates
Project 3 Repair/replace walkway and driveway
Project 4 Trim trees
To be attached to the Historic Property Preservation Agreement (Mills Act Contract) as Exhibit B.
Projects may be interior or exterior, but must utilize all of the tax savings. All projects that affect the exterior of the residence are subject to Historic Landmarks Commission/Staff review and approval before work begins. Work must meet all City requirements and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Restoration Plan may be amended or altered by mutual agreement. Retain copies of all receipts and permits for submittal with the required annual reports.
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: October 7, 2025
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Public Works Department
SUBJECT: Access Advisory Committee - Annual Report
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council receive an update on the recent activities and achievements of the Access Advisory Committee.
DISCUSSION:
In 1988, the City of Santa Barbara (City) recognized the importance of accessibility in design and construction and started an Ad Hoc Advisory Committee to assist the Architectural Board of Review and the Historic Landmarks Commission with accessibilityrelated items. In 2001, this Ad Hoc Committee became a standing Committee, known as the Staff Advisory Access Committee, under Resolution 01-034. In 2008, under Resolution 08-095, it was officially renamed the Access Advisory Committee (AAC).
Per the AAC’s governing Resolution 08-095 and the updated Resolution 21-061, the City’s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator will report annually to Council regarding the activities and achievements of the AAC. This update provides a brief history of the AAC, outlines the AAC’s role, highlights recent achievements, and discusses future goals and objectives.
AAC Purpose
In 2021, Resolution 21-061 revised the scope of the AAC’s purpose, function, membership requirements, term length, meeting frequency, and procedures. The revised resolution defines the purpose and function of the AAC as assisting and advising staff on public disability issues by:
a. Actively promoting the total integration and participation of persons with disabilities in all areas of economic, political, and community life. b. Serving as a coordinating body to receive input from citizens on the needs and concerns of the disabled community, formulating and recommending solutions based on these identified needs and concerns, and conveying such recommendations to the appropriate City departments.
c. Working with City staff to create conditions for establishing policies and practices, Agenda Item No. 13
File Code No. 640.03
Council Agenda Report
Access Advisory Committee - Annual Report
October 7, 2025
and to develop programs and services to facilitate the full integration and participation of persons with disabilities in all areas of economic, political, and community life.
d. Serving as a stakeholder in the design, planning, and implementation of City projects and programs to facilitate accessibility for persons with disabilities. e. Providing oversight for monitoring compliance with such codes, ordinances, and statutes that affect access to, or use of, City facilities, programs, and services by persons with disabilities.
f. Advising staff regarding setting project priorities to remove barriers and improve access within the City’s public rights-of-way.
g. Identifying opportunities to educate the public about disability and disability access issues within the community.
Recent Achievements
Prior to as well as since the inception of the ADA in 1990, the City has worked to ensure equal opportunities for those with disabilities. The AAC is a valuable community stakeholder that assists City staff with identifying needs and suggesting solutions to improve access to City programs, services, and facilities. The majority of AAC members personally navigate accessibility challenges throughout the City daily.
Over the past year, the AAC, in coordination with City staff, has actively engaged in a variety of areas related to accessibility, with the following achievements:
Provided input on Special Event Permitting via an established Ad Hoc Committee working with Parks and Recreation staff on potential enhancements to the permitting process, resulting in enhanced opportunities for access; Expressed concerns to staff about the need for additional accessible public parking for City Hall, which resulted in allowing public use for the three accessible spaces in the employee lot;
Advised and supported staff on completed access improvements adjacent to the Arlington Theater, the Granada Theatre, and the New Victoria Theatre; Provided input to staff on the prioritization of work included within the City’s ADA Transition Plan;
Continued with the nomination of individuals and/or organizations for recognition of their efforts related to accessibility within this community; Provided continued input to City staff and City Council on State Street Interim Operations and the master planning process;
Notified staff of and provided input to prioritize sidewalk barrier removals, such as missing access ramps, sidewalk uplifts due to tree roots, vegetation overgrowth within the path of travel, etc.;
Advised Parks and Recreation staff on recently completed access improvements at Alice Keck Park Memorial Gardens;
Advised Public Works staff on recommended locations to install 18 new accessible parking spaces and 7 new accessible pedestrian signals; Continued monthly meetings with the AAC Chair, the Vice Chair, and the ADA Coordinator to discuss and plan meeting agendas; and
Council Agenda Report
Access Advisory Committee - Annual Report
October 7, 2025
Assisted with the completion of Capital Improvements Projects, including:
o 139 new and retrofitted access ramps;
o 17,800 square feet of new or repaired/replaced sidewalk.
Goals, Priorities, and Challenges
The ongoing goals for the City and the AAC include:
Improving accessibility throughout the City, especially on the public right-of-way and City property;
Raising awareness of ADA deficiencies on private property that is open to the public;
Encouraging community collaboration on accessibility issues; Developing and providing ongoing professional in-service training for City ADA Liaison staff and AAC members; and
Providing input on design, development, and execution of key capital projects in the preliminary design phase.
Recognized priorities for the City and the AAC include:
ADA Transition Plan implementation;
Full, sustained citywide compliance with accessibility standards for outdoor business facilities through outreach, education, and enforcement; Restoring public transit to State Street;
Developing an ADA Transition Plan for the public right-of-way; Producing additional resources for Special Event Permitting and working to enhance access for City-sponsored special events;
Sidewalk barrier removal;
Further progress with the Blue Curb Parking Initiative; ADA parking enforcement;
In-service training for City ADA Liaison staff and AAC members; and Developing outreach and education tools for local businesses and the public.
Ongoing challenges for the City and the AAC include:
Limited staffing resources for enforcement of ADA standards; and Limited funding resources for capital projects and initiatives for new or enhanced activities, programs, and services.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The update on the recent activities and achievements of the Access Advisory Committee does not have any direct or indirect physical changes in the environment, therefore, this progress update falls outside of the definition of a “Project” under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines § 15378 (b)(5) as administrative activities of governments that will not result in physical changes in the environment are not subject to CEQA environmental review.
Council Agenda Report
Access Advisory Committee - Annual Report
October 7, 2025
BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Several of the goals and priorities identified above would require future unbudgeted costs.
For example, restoring public transit on State Street will require a dedicated funding source. Some other items do not require significant funding, yet would be limited by available staffing resources who are working on other City Council approved priorities. A recommended strategy for achieving some of the goals and priorities is integrating accessibility features, beyond those required by code, into active Capital Projects and programs. Staff will continue working closely with the AAC to advance these goals and priorities.
PREPARED AND
SUBMITTED BY: Brian D’Amour, Public Works Director/sk/lu APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator