Agenda packet, first session — Santa Barbara City Council, April 14, 2026 (part 4 of 4)

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
said maps are incorporated herein and made a part hereof. The entirety of any annexation shall become a part of the Hillside Design District upon annexation, unless otherwise determined as part of the annexation.

C. Highway 101 Santa Barbara Coastal Parkway Special Design District. All real property within the State owned or leased right-of-way of Highway 101 and all City owned or leased right-of-way which intersects Highway 101 within the S-D-3 Coastal Overlay Zone.

D. Lower Riviera Survey Area - Bungalow District. All real property within "Lower Riviera Survey Area - Bungalow District" as shown on the map labeled as such and appended to the end of this section -hereinafter referred to as the "Bungalow District." AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL

HILLSIDE DESIGN DISTRICT INDEX MAP
AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
HILLSIDE DESIGN DISTRICT MAP - AREA 2
AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
HILLSIDE DESIGN DISTRICT MAP - AREA 3
AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
§ 22.68.070. Special Design District - Lower Riviera Survey Area (Bungalow District).

A. Special Design District area map - Lower Riviera Survey Area - Bungalow District.

Applications for building permits to construct, alter, or add to multi-unit residential or twounit residential development on lots located within the "Lower Riviera Survey Area - Bungalow District" established pursuant to Section 22.68.060 shall be subject to design review in accordance with the requirements of this section as follows:

B. Review of building permit applications. Applications for building permits to construct, alter, or add to multi-unit residential or two-unit residential development on lots located within the Bungalow District shall be referred to the Community Development Director for review to determine if the application constitutes a project to demolish the structure. For the purposes of this section, a "demolition" shall be as defined in Section 30.300.080. Such a determination shall be made by the Community Development Director in writing within 30 days of the date of the original application. If the Community Development Director determines that the property is eligible for listing on the City's Potential Historic Resources list, the demolition application shall be referred to the Historic Landmarks Commission for determination of the historical significance of the building or structure pursuant to Section 30.157.110. If it is determined that the property is not eligible for listing on the City's Potential Historic Resources list and the Community Development Director determines that the application does constitute an application to demolish the structure, such application shall be referred to the City's Architectural Board of Review for review by the Board in accordance with the requirements of this section. If the Community Development Director determines that the application does not constitute a demolition under the terms of this section, the building permit shall be issued upon compliance with the otherwise applicable requirements of this code for appropriate and required design and development review.

C. Review of Bungalow District demolition applications by the Architectural Board of Review. An application referred to the Architectural Board of Review pursuant to subsection B above shall be reviewed by the Architectural Board of Review in accordance with the hearing, noticing, and appeal procedures established in Sections 22.68.040 and 22.68.100. An application referred to the Architectural Board of Review pursuant to subsection B above shall not be approved unless the Architectural Board of Review makes all of the following findings with respect to that application:

AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL

1. That the demolition will not result in the loss of a structure containing a primary feature or features of Bungalow or Arts and Crafts style residential architecture, which features are worthy of or appropriate for historical preservation;

2. That the demolition will not result in the loss of a structure which, although not eligible as a City Historic Resource, is a prime example of the Bungalow or Arts and Crafts style residential building appropriate for historical preservation;

3. That the demolition will not result in the loss of a structure which is prominent or which is a prime example of the Bungalow or Arts and Crafts style residential architecture for which this neighborhood is characterized or known.

D. Architectural Board of Review conditional approval of demolition within the Bungalow District.

1. Notwithstanding the above-stated requirement for appropriate demolition findings, the ABR may approve a demolition application within the Bungalow District if the ABR conditions the demolition permit such that any proposed future development of the real property upon which the structure or structures are located must comply with express conditions of approval designed to preserve certain existing architectural features or buildings, as determined appropriate by the ABR.

2. Such conditions may provide that any future development of the property involved must either incorporate the existing structures, in whole or in part, into the new development, or it must preserve certain features or aspects of the existing structures or of the site such that these features are incorporated into any future development of the real property, either through the preservation of the building or feature or its replication in the new development, as may be determined appropriate by the ABR.

3. Such conditions of approval shall be prepared in written form acceptable to the Community Development Director and the City Attorney and shall be recorded in the official records of Santa Barbara County with respect to the involved real property prior to issuance of any building permit for said demolition such that these conditions shall be binding on all future owners of the real property as conditions imposed on any new development for a period of 20 years after the conditional approval of the original demolition application and the completion of the demolition.

E. Review of new development within the Bungalow District by Architectural Board of Review. Applications for building permits to construct new multi-unit residential or two-unit AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
residential development on lots located within the Bungalow District shall be referred to the Architectural Board of Review for development plan review and approval in accordance with the public hearing, noticing and appeal requirements of Sections 22.68.040 and 22.68.100, provided that the property owner/applicant may be required to submit those development plan materials deemed necessary for full and appropriate review by the ABR prior to the ABR hearing.

F. Bungalow District findings. The ABR shall not approve a new development within the Bungalow District unless it makes both of the following findings:

1. Express conditions of approval have been imposed on the proposed development which appropriately incorporate the existing structures or architectural features or other aspects of these structures (or of the site involved) into the new development, or these structures, features or aspects will be appropriately replicated in the new development; and

2. The proposed development will not substantially diminish the unique architectural style and character of the Bungalow District as a residential neighborhood of the City.

G. Guidelines for Special Design District. The Lower Riviera Special Design District Guidelines adopted by resolution of the City Council shall provide direction and appropriate guidance to the ABR, the Planning Commission and City staff in connection with the review of applications filed pursuant to this section.
§ 22.68.080. Signs.

Application for sign permits shall be considered by the Architectural Board of Review only upon an appeal filed pursuant to Section 22.70.050.J of this code. § 22.68.090. Approval of Plans for Buildings or Structures on City Lands.

No building or structure shall be erected upon any land owned or leased by the City, or allowed to extend over or upon any street, or other public property, unless plans for the same and the location thereof shall first have been submitted to the Architectural Board of Review or the Historic Landmarks Commission, as applicable, for its approval. § 22.68.100. Appeal to Council - Notice and Hearing.

A. Procedure for appeal. Any action of the Architectural Board of Review on an application for preliminary or final approval taken pursuant to this chapter may be appealed to the City Council by the applicant or any interested person pursuant to Chapter 1.30 of this AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
Code. In deciding such an appeal, the City Council shall make those findings required of the Board with respect to a determination made pursuant to this chapter.

B. Notice of appeal. In addition to the procedures specified in Chapter 1.30, notice of the public hearing before the City Council on an appeal from a decision of the Architectural Board of Review made pursuant to this chapter shall be provided in the same manner as notice was provided for the hearing before the Architectural Board of Review.

C. Limits on new evidence. The City Council will decide the appeal in the exercise of its independent judgment based upon the record of the proceedings of the Single Family Design Board. New evidence will not be considered unless the City Council determines that relevant evidence exists that, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, could not have been produced or was improperly excluded at the hearing before the Architectural Board of Review. § 22.68.110. Expiration of Project Design Approvals.

A. Project design approval.

1. Approval Valid for Three Years. A Project Design Approval issued by the Architectural Board of Review or the City Council on appeal shall expire if a building permit for the project is not issued within three years of the granting of the Project Design Approval by the Architectural Board of Review or the City Council on appeal.

2. Extension of Project Design Approvals. Upon a written request from the applicant submitted prior to the expiration of the Project Design Approval, the Community Development Director may grant one two-year extension of a Project Design Approval.

B. Exclusions of time. The time period specified in this chapter for the validity of a Project Design Approval shall not include any period of time during which either of the following applies:

1. A City moratorium ordinance on the issuance of building permits is in effect; or

2. A lawsuit challenging the validity of the Project's approval by the City is pending in a court of competent jurisdiction.

AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
SECTION 3. Chapter 22.69 of Title 22 of the Santa Barbara Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:

CHAPTER 22.69

SINGLE FAMILY DESIGN BOARD
Design review is as required by Chapter 30.220, Design Review, Section 30.220.040, Single Family Design Board.
§ 22.69.010. Single Family Design Board.

A. Purpose. A Single Family Design Board is hereby created and established by the City to promote the general public welfare, protect and preserve the City's natural and historical charm, and enhance the City's aesthetic appeal and beauty. The goal of the Single Family Design Board shall be to ensure that single-unit residential projects are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood in size and design. The Single Family Design Board is also charged with the task of protecting public visual resources and promoting the ecological sustainability of the City's built environment through the design review process.

B. Membership. The Single Family Design Board shall be composed of five members appointed by the City Council. At least one member shall be a licensed architect. Up to three members of the public at large, who reside in the city, may be appointed who do not possess professional qualifications in fields related to architecture. Remaining members shall possess professional qualifications in fields related to architecture or landscape architecture, including, but not limited to, building design, structural engineering, industrial design, urban planning, or landscape contracting. All members of the Board with professional qualifications shall reside within Santa Barbara County and all members shall hold office at the pleasure of the City Council. A person may serve on the Architectural Board of Review or the Historic Landmarks Commission and the Single Family Design Board at the same time.

C. Conduct of meetings. The members of the Single Family Design Board shall elect from their own members a chair and vice-chair. The Community Development Director shall act as secretary and record Board actions and render written reports thereof for the Board as required by this chapter. The rules of procedure for the Board shall be established and approved by resolution of the City Council. Three members shall constitute a quorum. § 22.69.015. Definitions.

AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
Community Development Director. Community Development Director of the City of Santa Barbara, or designee.

Defined in this Chapter. If any word or phrase is defined in this chapter, the definition given in this chapter shall be operative for the purposes of this chapter.

Defined in the Municipal Code. If a word or phrase used in this chapter is not defined in this chapter, but is defined in Chapter 28.04 (for properties in the Coastal Zone), or either Chapter

30.295 or Chapter 30.300 (for properties in the Inland Zones) of this code, the word or phrase shall have the same meaning in this chapter as the meaning specified in the chapter that applies to the zone in which the property is located.

Project Design Approval. The review and approval of an application filed pursuant to this chapter
where the minutes of the Single Family Design Board identify the approval as "Project Design Approval." For the purposes of the State Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Section 65950 et seq.), the Project Design Approval is the substantive approval of the project on its design merits.

Undefined Words and Phrases. Any words or phrases used in this chapter that are not defined in this chapter, Chapter 28.04 (for properties in the Coastal Zone), or either Chapter 30.295 or Chapter 30.300 (for properties in the Inland Zones) of this code shall be construed according to the common meaning of the words and the context of their usage. § 22.69.020. Neighborhood Preservation - Single Family Residential Unit Design Review.

A. Approval required before issuance of permit. No building permit, grading permit, vegetation removal permit, or subdivision grading plan, the application for which is subject to the review of the Single Family Design Board pursuant to this chapter, shall be issued without the approval of the Board or the City Council, on appeal.

B. Building permits - special design districts.

1. Mission Area Special Design District and Lower Riviera Survey Area - Bungalow District. Applications for building permits to construct, alter, or add to the exterior of a singleunit residence or a related accessory structure on a lot or lots within the Mission Area Special Design District or the Lower Riviera Survey Area - Bungalow District identified in Section

22.68.060 shall be referred to the Single Family Design Board for design review in accordance AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
with the requirements of this chapter and the approved Single Family Design Board Guidelines.

2. Hillside Design District. Applications for building permits to construct, alter, or add to the exterior of any lot developed with either a single-unit residence, or a single-unit residence in combination with an Additional Dwelling Unit (Section 28.93.030.E), an Additional Residential Unit (Section 30.295.020.B.2), or an accessory structure on a lot or lots within the Hillside Design District identified in Section 22.68.060 shall be referred to the Single Family Design Board for design review in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and the approved Single Family Design Board Guidelines if either:
a. The average slope of the lot or the building site is 20% or more as calculated pursuant to Section 28.15.080 or 30.15.030 of this code; or
b. The application involves the replacement of an existing roof covering with a roof covering of different materials or colors.

C. Building permits - single-unit residential and additional residential units. Applications for building permits to construct, alter, or add to the exterior of any lot developed with either a single-unit residence, or a single-unit residence in combination with an Additional Dwelling Unit (Section 28.93.030.E), an Additional Residential Unit (Section 30.295.020.B.2), or an accessory structure on any lot shall be referred to the Single Family Design Board for design review in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and the Single Family Design Board Guidelines if the project for which the building permit is sought involves any of the following:

1. The construction of a new building or structure where any portion of the proposed construction is either: (a) two or more stories tall, or (b) 17 feet or taller in building height (for purposes of this paragraph 1, building height shall be measured from natural grade or finished grade, whichever is lower), or

2. An alteration to an existing building or structure where any portion of the proposed alteration either: (a) alters the second or higher story of the building or structure, or (b) alters a point on the existing building or structure that is 17 feet or higher in building height (for purposes of this paragraph 2, building height shall be measured from natural grade or finished grade, whichever is lower), or

3. An addition to an existing building or structure where any part of the proposed addition is either: (a) two or more stories tall, or (b) 17 feet or taller in building height (for AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
purposes of this paragraph 3, building height shall be measured from natural grade or finished grade, whichever is lower), or

4. The net floor area of all floors of all existing and new buildings on the lot will exceed 4,000 square feet as calculated pursuant to Section 28.15.083 or 30.20.030.A. of this code, or

5. The project requires a net floor area modification pursuant to Section 28.92.110.A.6 or 30.250.020.E of this code, or

6. The construction, alteration, or addition of a deck on the second or higher floor (including roof decks) or a balcony on the second or higher floor of any building that will extend perpendicularly more than three feet from the adjacent exterior wall or will be more than seven feet in length in the dimension parallel to the adjacent exterior wall, or

7. The construction, alteration, or addition of a retaining wall that is six feet or greater in height, or

8. The construction, alteration, or addition of a wall, fence or gate in the front yard of the lot that is greater than three and one half feet in height, excluding walls, fences, or gates that are constructed along the interior lot lines of the lot, shall be referred to the Single Family Design Board for a review of the proposed wall, fence or gate, or

9. The installation of a manufactured home, mobile home or factory-built home (as those terms are defined in the California Health and Safety Code), subject to the limitations on review specified in Government Code section 65852.3 et seq., or

10. The installation of a single-unit residence that was, as a whole or in part, previously located on another lot, or

11. Grading outside the footprint of the main building on the lot that exceeds either: (i) 50 cubic yards on a lot within the Hillside Design District identified in Section 22.68.060, or (ii) 250 cubic yards on a lot that is not within the Hillside Design District. For purposes of this paragraph 11, soil located within five feet of an exterior wall of a main building that is excavated and recompacted shall not be included in the calculation of the volume of grading outside the main building footprint, or

12. Projects involving an application for an exception to the covered parking requirements as specified in Section 28.90.100.G.1.c. or 30.175.030.N.1.a.ii. of this code.

AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL

13. Any new buildings, additions, or exterior alterations to existing buildings, resulting in either: (a) detached accessory buildings greater than 500 square feet, or (b) buildings, or portions of buildings, providing covered parking, resulting in three or more covered parking spaces on the lot.

D. Subdivision grading plans. All subdivision grading plans involving grading on a lot or lots located in any of the One Family Residence Zones (Chapter 28.15) or Single-Unit Residential Zones (Chapter 30.20) of this code shall be referred to the Single Family Design Board for a review of the proposed grading.

E. Grading permits. Applications for grading permits that propose grading on a vacant lot or lots located within a One-Family Residence Zones (Chapter 28.15) or Single-Unit Residential Zones (Chapter 30.20) of this code or on any lot that is developed with a singleunit residence, or a single-unit residence in combination with either an Additional Dwelling Unit (Section 28.93.030.E), an Additional Residential Unit (Section 30.295.020.B.2) or accessory buildings, and which are not submitted in connection with an application for a building permit for the construction or alteration of a building or structure on the same lot or lots, shall be referred to the Single Family Design Board for a review of the proposed grading.

F. Vegetation removal permits. Applications for vegetation removal permits pursuant to Chapter 22.10 of this title on a lot or lots located within a One-Family Residence Zone (Chapter 28.15) or a Single-Unit Residential Zone (Chapter 30.20), or on any lot that is developed with single-unit residence, or a single-unit residence in combination with an Additional Dwelling Unit (Section 28.93.030.E), an Additional Residential Unit (Section

30.295.020.B.2), or accessory buildings, shall be referred to the Single Family Design Board for a review of the proposed vegetation removal.

G. Retaining walls. The following types of retaining wall improvements, if located on a lot or lots within a One-Family Residence Zone (Chapter 28.15) or a Single-Unit Residential Zone (Chapter 30.20), or on any lot that is developed with a single-unit residence, or a singleunit residence in combination with an Additional Dwelling Unit (Section 28.93.030.E), an Additional Residential Unit (Section 30.295.020.B.2), or accessory buildings shall be referred to the Single Family Design Board for design review of the proposed retaining walls in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and the approved Single Family Design Board Guidelines:

1. The construction of a retaining wall on a lot or a building site with an average slope of 15% or more (as calculated pursuant to Section 28.15.080 or 30.15.030 of this code), or AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL

2. The construction of a retaining wall on a lot that is adjacent to or contains an ocean bluff, or

3. The construction of multiple terracing retaining walls that are not separated by a building or a horizontal distance of more than 10 feet where the combined height of the walls exceeds six feet.

H. Substantial alterations to approved landscape plans. The Single Family Design Board shall review any substantial alteration or deviation from the design, character, plant coverage at maturity, or other improvements specified on an approved landscape plan for any lot within the City of Santa Barbara that is developed with a single-unit residence where the conditions of approval for the development on the lot require the installation and maintenance of trees or landscaping in accordance with an approved landscape plan, whether or not such alteration or deviation to the landscape plan is proposed in connection with an alteration to a building or structure on the lot that is subject to design review by the Single Family Design Board.

Whether a proposed alteration or deviation is substantial shall be determined in accordance with the Single Family Design Guidelines.

I. Minor zoning exceptions. The Single Family Design Board shall review applications for a Minor Zoning Exception whenever it is allowed by Title 30, on any lot that is developed with a single-unit residence or a single-unit residence in combination with Additional Residential Unit (Section 30.295.020.B.2), subject to the criteria and findings in Title 30.

J. Submittal requirements. Applications for review by the Single Family Design Board shall be made in writing in such form as is approved by the Director of Community Development. No application shall be considered complete unless accompanied by the application fee in the amount established by resolution of the City Council.

K. Administrative approval. Minor design alterations, as specified in the Single Family Design Guidelines or the Single Family Design Board Guidelines approved by a resolution of the City Council, may be approved as a ministerial action by the Community Development Director without review by the Single Family Design Board. The Community Development Director shall have the authority and discretion to refer any minor design alteration to the Single Family Design Board if, in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the alteration has the potential to have an adverse effect on the architectural or landscape integrity of the building, structure or surrounding property.

L. Presumption regarding prior grading, tree removal, and construction. There shall be a presumption that any grading, removal of trees, or construction that occurred on the lot within AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
two years prior to the submittal of an application for a building permit to construct, alter, or add to a single-unit residence, an Additional Dwelling Unit (Section 28.93.030.E), an Additional Residential Unit (Section 30.295.020.B.2) or a related accessory structure was done in anticipation of such application, and said activities will be included in determining whether the project is subject to review by the Single Family Design Board pursuant to this chapter.

For purposes of this presumption, if the prior work required a permit from the City, the prior work shall not be considered complete unless a final inspection has occurred or a certificate of occupancy has been issued. An applicant has the burden to rebut this presumption with substantial evidence sufficient to convince the Single Family Design Board that such work was not done in an effort to avoid review of the entirety of the project by the Single Family Design Board.

M. Single family design guidelines. The Single Family Design Guidelines adopted by resolution of the City Council shall provide direction and appropriate guidance to decision makers and City staff in connection with applications reviewed pursuant to this chapter. § 22.69.030. Alternative Design Review by Historic Landmarks Commission.

A project shall be referred to the Historic Landmarks Commission for review under Section

30.220.020 of this Code if the project is proposed in any of the following locations:

A. A lot on which a City Landmark or City Structure of Merit is located; B. A property on the City's Potential Historic Resources List; or C. Any property located within the El Pueblo Viejo Landmark District or another landmark district.

Review by the Historic Landmarks Commission is in lieu of review by the Single Family Design Board under this chapter.
§ 22.69.040. Single Family Design Board Notice and Hearing.

A. Projects that require a noticed public hearing. Single Family Design Board review of the following projects must be preceded by a noticed public hearing:

AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL

1. New single-unit residence, Additional Dwelling Unit (Section 28.93.030.E) or Additional Residential Unit (Section 30.295.020.B.2);

2. The addition of over 500 square feet of net floor area to a single-unit residence, an Additional Dwelling Unit (Section 28.93.030.E) or an Additional Residential Unit (Section

30.295.020.B.2);

3. An addition of a new second or higher story to a single-unit residence, an Additional Dwelling Unit (Section 28.93.030.E), an Additional Residential Unit (Section 30.295.020.B.2), or a related accessory structure;

4. An addition of over 150 square feet of net floor area to an existing second or higher story of a single-unit residence, an Additional Dwelling Unit (Section 28.93.030.E), an Additional Residential Unit (Section 30.295.020.B.2), or a related accessory structure;

5. Projects involving an application for a Minor Zoning Exception as specified in Title 30 of this code;

6. Projects involving grading in excess of 250 cubic yards outside the footprint of any main building (soil located within five feet of an exterior wall of a main building that is excavated and recompacted shall not be included in the calculation of the volume of grading outside the building footprint);

7. Projects involving exterior lighting with the apparent potential to create significant glare on neighboring parcels; or

8. Projects involving an application for an exception to the covered parking requirements as specified in Section 28.90.100.G.1.c or 30.175.030.M of this code.

B. Mailed notice. Not less than 10 calendar days before the date of the hearing required by subsection A above, the City shall cause written notice of the project hearing to be sent by first class mail to the following persons: (1) the applicant, and (2) the current record owner (as shown on the latest equalized assessment roll) of any lot, or any portion of a lot, which is located not more than 300 feet from the exterior boundaries of the lot which is the subject of the action. The written notice shall advise the recipient of the following: (1) the date, time and location of the hearing, (2) the right of the recipient to appear at the hearing and to be heard by the Single Family Design Board, (3) the location of the subject property, and (4) the nature of the application subject to design review.

AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
C. Additional noticing methods. In addition to the required mailed notice specified in subsection B above, the City may also require notice of the hearing to be provided by the applicant in any other manner that the City deems necessary or desirable, including, but not limited to, posted notice on the project site and notice delivered to non-owner residents of any of the 10 lots closest to the lot which is the subject of the action. However, the failure of any person or entity to receive notice given pursuant to such additional noticing methods shall not constitute grounds for any court to invalidate the actions of the City for which the notice was given.

D. Projects requiring decisions by the city Council, Planning Commission, or Staff Hearing Officer. Whenever a project requires another land use decision or approval by the City Council, the Planning Commission, or the Staff Hearing Officer, the mailed notice of the first hearing before the Single Family Design Board shall comply with the notice requirements of this section or the notice requirements applicable to the other land use decision or approval, whichever are greater. However, nothing in this section shall require either: (1) notice of any hearing before the Single Family Design Board to be published in a newspaper; or (2) mailed notice of hearings before the Single Family Design Board after the first hearing conducted by the Single Family Design Board, except as otherwise provided in the Single Family Design Board Guidelines adopted by resolution of the City Council. § 22.69.050. Neighborhood Preservation, Grading and Vegetation Removal Ordinance Findings.

If a project is referred to the Single Family Design Board for review pursuant to Section

22.69.020 and the Single Family Design Board Guidelines, the Single Family Design Board shall make the findings specified below prior to approving the project.

A. Neighborhood preservation findings. Prior to approval of any project, the Single Family Design Board shall make each of the following findings:

1. Consistency and Appearance. The proposed development is consistent with the scenic character of the City and will enhance the appearance of the neighborhood.

2. Compatibility. The proposed development is compatible with the neighborhood, and its size, bulk, and scale are appropriate to the site and neighborhood.

3. Quality Architecture and Materials. The proposed buildings and structures are designed with quality architectural details. The proposed materials and colors maintain the natural appearance of the ridgeline or hillside.

AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL

4. Trees. The proposed project does not include the removal of or significantly impact any designated Specimen Tree, Historic Tree or Landmark Tree. The proposed project, to the maximum extent feasible, preserves and protects healthy, non-invasive trees with a trunk diameter of four inches or more measured four feet above natural grade. If the project includes the removal of any healthy, non-invasive tree with a diameter of four inches or more measured four feet above natural grade, the project includes a plan to mitigate the impact of such removal by planting replacement trees in accordance with applicable tree replacement ratios.

5. Health, Safety, and Welfare. The public health, safety, and welfare are appropriately protected and preserved.

6. Good Neighbor Guidelines. The project generally complies with the Good Neighbor Guidelines regarding privacy, landscaping, noise and lighting.

7. Public Views. The development, including proposed structures and grading, preserves significant public scenic views of and from the hillside.

B. Hillside Design District and sloped lot findings. In addition to the findings specified in subsection A above, prior to approval of any project on a lot within the Hillside Design District described in Section 22.68.060 or on a lot or a building site that has an average slope of 15% or more (as calculated pursuant to Section 28.15.080 or 30.15.030 of this code), the Single Family Design Board shall make each of the following findings:

1. Natural Topography Protection. The development, including the proposed structures and grading, is appropriate to the site, is designed to avoid visible scarring, and does not significantly modify the natural topography of the site or the natural appearance of any ridgeline or hillside.

2. Building Scale. The development maintains a scale and form that blends with the hillside by minimizing the visual appearance of structures and the overall height of structures.

C. Grading findings. In addition to any other applicable findings specified in this section, prior to approval of any project that requires design review under Section 22.69.030 of this chapter, the Single Family Design Board shall make each of the following findings:

1. The proposed grading will not significantly increase siltation in or decrease the water quality of streams, drainages or water storage facilities to which the property drains; and

2. The proposed grading will not cause a substantial loss of southern oak woodland habitat.

AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
D. Vegetation removal findings. In addition to any other applicable findings specified in this section, prior to approving a vegetation removal permit that requires design review under Section 22.69.030 of this chapter, the Single Family Design Board shall make each of the following findings:

1. The proposed vegetation removal will not significantly increase siltation in or decrease the water quality of streams, drainages or water storage facilities to which the property drains; and

2. The proposed vegetation removal will not cause a substantial loss of southern oak woodland habitat; and

3. The proposed vegetation removal will comply with all applicable provisions of Chapter

22.10, "Vegetation Removal," of this code.
§ 22.69.055. Green Building Standard for Large Residences.

If a project proposes more than 500 square feet of new net floor area (new construction, replacement construction, or additions), and the net floor area of all existing and new buildings on the lot resulting from the application will exceed 4,000 square feet of net floor area as calculated pursuant to Chapter 28.04, all new square footage (new construction, replacement construction, or additions) proposed as part of the project shall meet or exceed a three-star designation under the Santa Barbara Contractors' Association Built Green program or equivalent standards under another green construction program recognized by the City. § 22.69.060. Single Family Design Board Referral to Planning Commission for Comments.

A. Planning Commission comments. When the Single Family Design Board determines that a project is proposed for a site which is highly visible to the public, the Board may, prior to granting preliminary approval of the application, require presentation of the application to the Planning Commission solely for the purpose of obtaining comments from the Commission regarding the application for use by the Single Family Design Board in its deliberations.

B. Notice and hearing. Prior to making any comments regarding an application pursuant to this section, the Planning Commission shall hold a noticed public hearing. Notice of the hearing shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of Section 22.69.040. § 22.69.070. Special Design District - Lower Riviera Survey Area (Bungalow District).

AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
A. Special Design District area map - Lower Riviera Survey Area - Bungalow District.

Applications for building permits to construct, alter, or add to single-unit residential development or related accessory buildings or structures on lots located within the "Lower Riviera Survey Area - Bungalow District" established pursuant to Section 22.68.060 shall be subject to design review in accordance with the requirements of this section as follows:

B. Review of building permit applications. Applications for building permits to construct, alter, or add to single-unit residential development on lots located within the Bungalow District shall be referred to the Community Development Director for review to determine if the application constitutes a project to demolish the structure. For the purposes of this section, a "demolition" shall be as defined in Section 30.300.080. Such a determination shall be made by the Community Development Director in writing within 30 days of the date of the original permit application. If the Community Development Director determines that the property is eligible for listing on the City's Potential Historic Resources list, the application shall be referred to the Historic Landmarks Commission for determination of the historical significance of the buildings or structures pursuant to Section 30.157.110. If it is determined that the property is not eligible for listing on the City's Potential Historic Resources list, and the Community Development Director determines that the application does constitute an application to demolish the structure, such application shall be referred to the City's Single Family Design Board for review by the Board in accordance with the requirements of this section. If the Community Development Director determines that the application does not constitute a demolition under the terms of this section, the building permit shall be issued upon compliance with the otherwise applicable requirements of this code for appropriate and required design and development review.

C. Review of Bungalow District demolition applications by the Single Family Design Board. An application referred to the Single Family Design Board pursuant to subsection B above shall be reviewed by the Board in accordance with the hearing, noticing, and appeal procedures established in Sections 22.69.040 and 22.69.080. An application referred to the Single Family Design Board pursuant to subsection B above shall not be approved unless the Single Family Design Board makes all of the following findings with respect to that application:

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL

D. Single Family Design Board conditional approval of demolition within the Bungalow District.

1. Notwithstanding the above-stated requirement for appropriate demolition findings, the Single Family Design Board may approve a demolition application within the Bungalow District if the Board conditions the demolition permit such that any proposed future development of the real property upon which the structure or structures are located must comply with express conditions of approval designed to preserve certain existing architectural features or buildings, as determined appropriate by the Board.

3. Such conditions of approval shall be prepared in written format acceptable to the Community Development Director and the City Attorney and shall be recorded in the official records of Santa Barbara County with respect to the involved real property prior to issuance of any building permit for said demolition such that these conditions shall be binding on all future owners of the real property as conditions imposed on any new development for a period of 20 years after the conditional approval of the original demolition application and the completion of the demolition.

E. Review of new development within the Bungalow District by Single Family Design Board. Applications for building permits to construct new single-unit residential development on lots located within the Bungalow District shall be referred to the Single Family Design Board for development plan review and approval in accordance with the public hearing, noticing and appeal requirements of Sections 22.69.040 and 22.69.080.

AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
F. Bungalow District findings. The Single Family Design Board shall not approve a new single- unit residential development within the Bungalow District unless it makes both of the following findings:

2. The proposed development will not substantially diminish the unique architectural style and character of the Bungalow District as a residential neighborhood of the City.

G. Guidelines for Special Design District. The Lower Riviera Special Design District Guidelines adopted by resolution of the City Council shall provide direction and appropriate guidance to the decision makers and City staff in connection with the review of applications filed pursuant to this section.
§ 22.69.080. Appeals to Planning Commission - Notice and Hearing.

A. Procedure for appeal. Any action of the Single Family Design Board to approve, conditionally approve, or deny project design approval or project final approval subject to this chapter shall be appealable to the Planning Commission under the provisions of subsection B of Section 30.205.150 of this Code and subsections B and C of this section. Notwithstanding Section 30.205.150, subsection A.3, and Section 1.30.050 of this Code, the Planning Commission decision on appeal shall be final subject only to judicial review as provided in Section 1.30.020.

B. Notice of appeal. Notice of the public hearing before the Planning Commission on an appeal from a decision of the Single Family Design Board made pursuant to this chapter shall be provided in the same manner as notice was provided for the hearing before the Single Family Design Board.

C. Planning Commission decision - limits on new evidence. The Planning Commission will decide the appeal in the exercise of its independent judgment based upon the record of the proceedings of the Single Family Design Board. New evidence will not be considered unless the Planning Commission determines by a majority vote at the hearing on the appeal that relevant evidence exists that, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, could not have been produced or was improperly excluded at the hearing before the Single Family Design Board.

AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
D. The Planning Commission decision on the appeal shall be based upon findings required by this chapter and the guidelines adopted pursuant to subsection M of Section

22.69.020.
§ 22.69.090. Expiration of Project Design Approvals.

A. Project design approval.

1. Approval Valid for Three Years. A Project Design Approval issued by the Single Family Design Board or the Planning Commission on appeal shall expire if a building permit for the project is not issued within three years of the final decision approving or conditionally approving the Project Design Approval.

2. Extension of Project Design Approval. Upon a written request from the applicant submitted prior to the expiration of the Project Design Approval, the Community Development Director may grant one two-year extension of a Project Design Approval.

B. Exclusions of time. The time period specified in this chapter for the validity of a Project Design Approval shall not include any period of time during which either of the following applies:

1. A City moratorium ordinance on the issuance of building permits is in effect; or

2. A lawsuit challenging the validity of the project's approval by the City is pending in a court of competent jurisdiction.

AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
SECTION 20. Uncodified. Severability and Interpretation A. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any persons or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.

B. Interpretation. This Ordinance shall be construed to confer upon the City the maximum power and authority allowed by state and federal law. In the event state or federal law is found to conflict with and preempt any provision of this Ordinance, or in the event state or federal law changes to conflict with and preempt any provision of this Ordinance, the remaining and non-conflicting provisions of this Ordinance shall be interpreted and construed to give maximum effect to the remaining and non-conflicting provisions so as to effectuate, to the greatest extent possible, the purposes and restrictions expressed herein.

SECTION 21. Uncodified. California Environmental Quality Act This action is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15305 based on the City’s adopted CEQA implementation ordinance per SBMC Section 22.100.070 (List of Ministerial Projects and Categorical Exemptions), Subsection C.5. Class 5: Minor Alternations in Land Use Limitations, Subsection c. Adoption or amendment of land use or development ordinance, regulations, standards, or guidelines that substantially maintain existing land use intensity or density. The amendments to Title 30 are administrative in nature and will not result in any increase in the intensity or density of land use above what is currently allowed under the General Plan Land Use designations. There is no possibility of a significant effect on the environment from this action.

SECTION 22. Uncodified. Effective Date; Applicability to Pending Applications
A. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on May 28, 2026 (“Effective Date”).

AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 22

SINGLE FAMILY STREAMLINING PROJECT

INTRODUCTION TO CITY COUNCIL
B. Applications Submitted Before Effective Date. Notwithstanding Subsection A, any building permit application or planning application submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the Effective Date may, at the applicant’s discretion, be processed in accordance with the codes, standards, and regulations in effect at the time of initial submittal; provided that a valid building permit is issued for the proposed project no later than December 17, 2026, and the permit remains valid and does not expire.

C. Applications Submitted On or After Effective Date. Any building permit application or planning application submitted to the Community Development Department on or after the Effective Date, shall be subject to the provisions of this Ordinance.

D. Revisions After the Effective Date. Any revision or modification to the scope of a project in a manner that increases scope, density, intensity or triggers new requirements under this Ordinance, made on or after the Effective Date, shall comply with all requirements of this Ordinance.

SECTION 23. Uncodified. Typographical Errors.

The Clerk of the City of Santa Barbara is authorized to make the following types of changes to the Santa Barbara Municipal Code: 1) changes to references from other Title so the Santa Barabara Municipal Code to Title 30; and 2) corrections of grammatical or typographical errors.

RESOLUTION NO._____

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA BARBARA AMENDING THE SINGLE FAMILY

DESIGN BOARD GUIDELINES
WHEREAS, on April 14, 2026 Council approved the Single Family Design Board’s (SFDB) Guidelines to expand and update the administrative approval standards, update the SFDB’s meeting procedures, and update and clarify SFDB application submittal requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Single Family Design Board Guidelines have been revised to reflect changes related to the Single Family Streamlining Project and associated Ordinance Amendments.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA THAT:

The Council adopts the revised Single Family Design Board Guidelines attached as an Exhibit hereto.

Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 1 ends

SINGLE FAMILY DESIGN

BOARD GUIDELINES
Prepared By

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Originally Adopted in 2007
Revised 2026

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 2 ends

Table of Contents
Introduction .................................................................. 4 A. Purpose of the SFDB Guidelines ...................................................................... 4 B. SFDB Purpose ................................................................................................... 4 C. SFDB Background ............................................................................................. 4 D. SFDB Goals......................................................................................................... 5 E. Relationship to Other Documents ................................................................... 5 F. Relationship to Other Guidelines..................................................................... 6 General Information ..................................................... 10

1.1 SFDB Jurisdiction ............................................................................................. 10

1.2 Levels of SFDB Review...................................................................................... 10

1.3 Stages of Design Review ................................................................................. 12

1.4 Scope of Project Review ................................................................................. 18 Meeting Procedures .................................................... 24

2.1 General Information and Procedures.............................................................. 24

2.2 Agenda Organization ....................................................................................... 25

2.3 Public Notice...................................................................................................... 26

2.4 Project Presentation and Plan Substitution .................................................... 26

2.5 Public Meeting and Public Comment............................................................... 27

2.6 Continuances, Postponements, and Referrals................................................ 28

2.7 Decisions............................................................................................................ 28

2.8 Appeals, Extensions, and Expirations.............................................................. 29 Meeting Conduct .......................................................... 32

3.1 Officer Election.................................................................................................. 32

3.2 Subcommittees/Advisory Committees............................................................ 32

3.3 General Meeting Conduct ................................................................................ 32 Application Requirements and Visual Aids.................. 38

4.1 Application Requirements................................................................................ 38

4.2 When Supplemental Visual Aids Are Required ............................................... 39

4.3 Visual Aids Waiver............................................................................................. 41

4.4 Types of Visual Aids .......................................................................................... 41

4.5 Story Pole Requirements.................................................................................. 42 Landscape Design Guidelines ....................................... 46

5.1 Purpose.............................................................................................................. 46

5.2 Landscape Plan Applicability and Requirements ........................................... 46

5.3 General Landscape Design Guidelines............................................................. 48

5.4 Tree Preservation.............................................................................................. 50

5.5 Special Areas ..................................................................................................... 52 Administrative Approval Standards............................. 56

6.1 Administrative Approval Procedures .............................................................. 56

6.2 General Administrative Approval Standards .................................................. 58

6.3 Project-Specific Administrative Approval Standards...................................... 59

6.4 Definitions ......................................................................................................... 67

EXHIBIT

Page 4 ends

Single Family Design Board Guidelines
Introduction
A. Purpose of the SFDB Guidelines

1. What the Guidelines Do
The Single Family Design Board Guidelines support high-quality design for single-unit residential development in the City of Santa Barbara. They outline the SFDB’s goals and policies and serve as a reference for applicants, design professionals, City staff, and the public, throughout the design review process.

2. Advisory Nature of the Guidelines
These Guidelines are advisory rather than legally binding. A project may be denied if it does not meet them; however, noncompliance does not invalidate SFDB decisions or create legal claims against the City or its representatives.

3. Minor Edits Authorized by Resolution
Under City Council Resolution No. 07-032, the Community Development Director may make minor or clarifying edits—such as correcting formatting, updating references, or clarifying language—in consultation with the City Attorney. These edits do not require City Council approval.

4. Relationship to State Law and the Municipal Code
These Guidelines must follow State law and the Santa Barbara Municipal Code. If there is a conflict, State law or the Municipal Code will take priority.

B. SFDB Purpose
Single-family homes are an important part of Santa Barbara’s neighborhood character. The Single Family Design Board (SFDB) is responsible for ensuring that new and remodeled homes reflect high-quality design, fit the surrounding neighborhood, protect the City’s visual resources, support long-term sustainability, and contribute to a desirable living environment.

C. SFDB Background

1. Establishment of the Board
The SFDB was established by ordinance on June 8, 2007, following the update to the Neighborhood Preservation Ordinance (NPO) and Single Family Residence Design Guidelines, which began in 2004. The Board reviews single-unit residential projects to ensure they are compatible with neighborhood character and meet the City’s design standards.

2. Membership
The SFDB consists of five members:
• At least one licensed architect.
• Up to three members of the public at large who do not possess professional qualifications in fields related to architecture.
• The remaining members must have professional qualifications in architecture or landscape architecture or related fields, such as building design, structural engineering, industrial design, urban planning, or landscape contracting.

D. SFDB Goals
The SFDB follows a set of general goals that guide its review process:
• Ensure development is compatible with the site and the surrounding neighborhood • Enhance neighborhood character through quality and diversity in architectural styles • Promote high standards in architectural and landscape design • Ensure new development does not significantly impact adjacent historic resources • Protect Santa Barbara’s natural and built visual resources • Preserve public scenic views of the ocean and mountains

1. Approach to Design Review
The SFDB reviews projects to ensure they are compatible in size and design with surrounding neighborhoods. In Santa Barbara―where topography, architectural variety, and zoning regulations vary widely― compatibility doesn’t mean uniformity. A home may differ in size or style and still be appropriate if it respects neighborhood patterns and character.

2. Design Evaluation Factors
The Board evaluates each project holistically, considering massing, scale, materials, site planning, and architectural consistency. While no specific architectural style is required, proposed designs must be high-quality and well-executed examples of their chosen styles. Common styles include Craftsman, Spanish Colonial Revival, Mediterranean, Victorian, Cottage, and Contemporary.

3. Related Design Goals
For more information on the SFDB’s goals related to infill development, hillside neighborhoods, neighborhood compatibility, and sustainability, see the “Introduction” section of the Single Family Residence Design Guidelines.

E. Relationship to Other Documents

1. General Plan and Coastal Land Use Plan
• The Santa Barbara General Plan provides policies related to visual quality, neighborhood compatibility, and protection of historic resources. It describes the character of individual neighborhoods and supports sustainable community design.
• The Coastal Land Use Plan governs land use within the Coastal Zone including policies on coastal access, coastal resource protection, scenic resources, and public scenic views. The Zoning Ordinance and SFDB Guidelines help implement the goals of both plans.

EXHIBIT

Page 6 ends

Single Family Design Board Guidelines

2. Municipal Code
The Santa Barbara Municipal Code (SBMC) establishes mandatory development standards. These Guidelines are intended to supplement the Municipal Code by offering additional detail and design direction.

For the SFDB ordinance, refer to SBMC Chapter 30.220 (Design Review) which includes:
• Projects requiring SFDB review
• Required findings for approval
• Projects requiring a mailed notice
Procedures for processing planning applications, including noticing requirements, can be found in SBMC Chapter 30.205 (Common Procedures).

3. Relationship to the Single Family Residence Design Guidelines While the SFDB Guidelines address Board operations and procedures, the Single Family Residence Design Guidelines (SFRDG) provide and the primary design criteria for single-unit residential development citywide.

They are advisory rather than mandatory but should inform the SFDB’s findings when approving or denying projects. These guidelines include illustrative examples and cover topics such as architectural style, massing, and site planning. They also provide guidance on projects located in the Hillside Design District.

Some design topics―such as historic building information and landscape design―are addressed in the SFDB Guidelines but not in the Single Family Residence Design Guidelines.

Applicants are encouraged to consult the Neighborhood Compatibility Guidelines (starting on page 15-C of the Single Family Residence Design Guidelines) and consider the Neighborhood Compatibility Findings in SBMC §30.220.040.E.

F. Relationship to Other Guidelines
Several other City-adopted guidelines provide additional direction on architectural appearance, site design, and landscape. The SFDB Guidelines are generally consistent with those documents but may offer more detail on certain topics. If a conflict arises, the guidelines specific to the area or subject matter take precedence. • Fence, Screen, Wall, and Hedge Guidelines: Explains Coastal Zone standards for exceptions to height standards for fences, screens, walls and hedges.
• Historic Resource Design Guidelines: Provides guidance on new construction, specifically location and site design and massing adjacent to historic resources to avoid negative impacts. • Lower Riviera Special Design District Guidelines: Ensures compatibility with the existing pattern of pedestrian-friendly bungalow character of the district. • Outdoor Lighting & Streetlight Design Guidelines: Includes outdoor lighting standards to minimize glare and light trespass.
• Upper State Street Area Design Guidelines: Describes the different Upper State Street area neighborhoods and assists the public in designing projects to be compatible with those neighborhoods. • Urban Design Guidelines: Promotes traditional design principles and pedestrian-friendly development in the urban grid.

EXHIBIT

Page 8 ends

1| General
Information

EXHIBIT

Page 10 ends

Single Family Design Board Guidelines
General Information

1.1 SFDB Jurisdiction
Projects on a lot with one single-family residential unit or related accessory structures in any zone are subject to SFDB review under SBMC §30.220.040.

Projects involving designated and potentially historic homes and homes in Historic District Overlay Zones that would otherwise be subject to review by the SFDB are instead referred to the Historic Landmarks Commission under SBMC §30.220.020.

The SFDB’s purview includes building and site design:
• Building design includes building size, bulk, height, massing, scale, architectural style, and exterior finish materials.
• Site design includes the placement of buildings on a lot, public views, vehicle access and circulation, pedestrian circulation, parking placement and design, landscaping, and other similar issues, including any topic in these guidelines and other applicable design guidelines.

1.2 Levels of SFDB Review
The SFDB uses different levels of review based on the scale, complexity, and potential neighborhood impact of a project. This tiered approach allows more detailed consideration of larger projects, while smaller or low-impact projects may be reviewed through streamlined procedures.
1 1.2.1 Full Board Review
Full Board is the standard level of SFDB review and is conducted by a quorum of at least three, and up to five, Board members.
a. Projects subject to Full Board review
• Subdivision grading plans subject to Planning Commission or Public Works review. • New single-unit residences.
• Upper-story additions over 500 square feet or additions that create a new second or higher story.
• Projects exceeding the maximum allowable floor area ratio (FAR) in the Municipal Code. • Significant site work, including more than 100 cubic yards of grading or grading on slopes over 20%.
b. Referrals
The Full Board may refer projects to Consent Review or Administrative Design Review when the project is minor, when the Board has provided clear direction and only follow-up adjustments remain, or when the project is unlikely to result in significant visual or neighborhood impacts.

1.2.2 Consent Review
Consent Review is used for minor projects that do not qualify for Administrative Approval but are unlikely to result in significant visual or neighborhood impacts. One SFDB member, assisted by Staff, conducts the review. All decisions are subject to ratification by the Full Board. a. Projects eligible for Consent Review
• First story-additions up to 1,200 sq ft.
• Additions to existing second stories up to 500 square feet. New second story is Full Board. • Additions to existing first or second stories larger than 250 square feet that result in over

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 12 ends

85% required FAR.
• Site work involving up to 100 cubic yards of grading and not on slopes over 20%; • Requests for minor design or development standard waivers, Minor Zoning Exceptions, or similar allowance, when a Design Review body is the Review Authority. b. Referrals to Full Board
Items may be referred to the Full Board when the project involves design questions beyond the scope of Consent Review, where neighbor concerns warrant broader consideration, or when Board direction is needed to resolve outstanding issues. c. Referrals to the Director
Items may be referred to the Director for Administrative Design Review when the outstanding issues are limited in scope and can be addressed through a ministerial approval.

1.2.3 Administrative Design Review
Some minor projects may be approved ministerially by the Community Development Director without an SFDB hearing.
a. Projects eligible for Administrative Review
Projects eligible for Administrative Staff review are listed in Section 6 of these Guidelines. b. Referrals to the Board
The Director may refer any project to the Consent Calendar or the Full Board if:
• It may adversely affect the architectural integrity of the building or nearby properties, or • It does not appear consistent with the Single Family Residence Design Guidelines.

1.3 Stages of Design Review
Santa Barbara’s design review process is organized into stages that follow the natural progression of a project allowing early feedback, coordination with land-use decisions, and verification of design consistency from initial concepts through final details.

1.3.1 Pre-Application Design Consultation (One-Time, Optional) a. Purpose
The One-Time Pre-Application Design Consultation provides early, informal, and non-binding feedback prior to submitting a full Planning Application. It is intended for very preliminary concepts, in contrast to the more developed plans typically submitted for Concept Review.
b. When it Occurs
This consultation may be scheduled on the next available agenda and occurs before a full Planning Application is filed. Only one hearing will be scheduled per pre-application submittal.
c. Who Reviews
The SFDB conducts the consultation at a public meeting. d. Scope of Review
The SFDB provides general comments on site planning, building placement, massing, scale, and architectural character. The Board may identify potential neighborhood compatibility issues such as privacy, views, or streetscape presence. e. Submittal Requirements and Procedures
Applicants must submit a separate pre-application prior to filing a full Planning Application. Sketches or conceptual plans are encouraged. Applications are processed under SBMC §30.205.030 (Pre-Application Review). Plans submitted for a Pre-Application Design Consultation are not reviewed for completeness or compliance with the Municipal Code. f. Noticing and Appeals
Projects subject to a mailed notice will require a mailed notice for the Pre-Application Design Consultation. Pre-Application Design Review is not a discretionary action. No formal action is taken, and the review is not appealable.

1.3.2 Concept Design Review (Optional)
a. Purpose
Concept Design Review provides applicants and the community an early opportunity to assess a project’s overall design approach before significant resources are invested in detailed plans. The goal is to identify potential issues, provide early guidance, and reduce the likelihood of costly redesigns later in the process. b. When it Occurs
Concept Review is an optional review stage available after a full Planning Application is submitted but before the application is reviewed for completeness or consistency with the Municipal Code.
c. Who Reviews
The SFDB conducts Concept Design Review at a public meeting. d. Recommended Project Types
Concept Review is encouraged for:
• New single-unit residences.
• Additions over 800 sq. ft. or over 50% of the existing structure. • Projects involving height or massing changes, such as second-story additions. • Projects with potential impacts on privacy, views, or neighborhood character including projects in the Hillside Design District and along Shoreline Drive. • Projects requiring discretionary land use approvals by the Staff Hearing Officer, Planning Commission, or City Council.

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 14 ends

e. Scope of Review
The SFDB considers site layout, building orientation, architectural style, compatibility with surrounding development, and consistency with the Single Family Residence Design Guidelines. Concept Review may occur more than once, but applicants are encouraged to incorporate feedback to avoid more than two hearings.
f. Submittal Requirements and Procedures
Applicants request Concept Review by submitting a Planning Application and indicating that Concept Review is desired. Applications are processed under SBMC §30.205.040 (Concept Review). Projects with major unresolved zoning or policy issues will not be scheduled until those issues are addressed.
g. Noticing and Appeals
Projects subject to a mailed notice will require a mailed notice at Concept Review. No formal action is taken, and the review is not appealable. h. Forwarding of Comments
If a project requires discretionary land use approval, SFDB’s Concept Review comments are included in the minutes forwarded to the appropriate decision-making body.

1.3.3 Project Design Review (Discretionary Action)
a. Purpose
Project Design Review is the formal stage of the Design Review process. The SFDB evaluates design compatibility, massing, proportion, siting, and consistency with applicable design guidelines. Approval at this stage is referred to as Project Design Approval (PDA) and constitutes the City’s discretionary Design Review decision under the State Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code §65950 et seq.).
b. When it Occurs
Project Design Review occurs after the application is deemed complete, development-standard compliance is verified, and environmental review is finished. Projects requiring discretionary land use approvals may only be scheduled after the land use decision has been made, and plans must reflect all conditions of approval. c. Who Reviews
The SFDB conducts Project Design Review and issues the discretionary design approval.

City staff provide technical and statutory review, verify environmental compliance, and confirm conformance with the Municipal Code.
d. Level of Plan Detail Required
Plans submitted for Project Design Review must include enough detail for the SFDB to evaluate design quality and guideline consistency. Required components include:
• Site plan and building orientation
• Architectural elevations and materials
• Landscape plans
• Exterior lighting
• Window and door specifications
• Roofing and finish materials
• Exterior details, materials, and finishes
• Exterior mechanical equipment
• Screening elements
Construction-level drawings are not required unless SFDB specifically requests them for design or aesthetic clarity in the design review process. e. Submittal Requirements and Procedures
Applicants request Project Design Review through their Planning Application. If Concept Review occurred, the same application may be used to request Project Design Review after receiving SFDB Concept Review comments. Applications are processed under SBMC §30.205.050 (Review of Discretionary Applications).
e. Noticing and Appeals
Mailed noticing is required as specified in the Municipal Code. A Project Design Review decision is a discretionary action and is appealable to the Planning Commission. f. Next Steps After Approval
Following Project Design Approval, applicants may submit for a building permit.

1.3.4 Final Design Review
a. Purpose
Final Design Review confirms that construction drawings are in substantial conformance with the plans granted Project Design Approval. Approval at this stage is referred to as Final Approval. This review ensures all conditions of approval and detailed design elements are fully incorporated before issuance of a building permit. b. When it Occurs
Final Design Review typically occurs during building permit plan check, after Project Design Approval has been granted.
c. Who Reviews
The Director reviews the building permit drawings for substantial conformance. The Director may refer an application to the SFDB for a decision when Board input is needed to verify conformance or resolve design-related questions. If changes are not clearly identified on the plans, they are not considered approved. d. Scope of Review
During the building permit application review, the Director (or SFDB upon referral) verifies:
• Substantial conformance with Project Design Approval. • Inclusion of all conditions of approval (if applicable). • Completeness of final details such as colors, materials, door hardware, and exterior lighting fixtures.

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 16 ends

e. Submittal Requirements and Procedures
For Final Approval, applicants must include the following information on their building permit construction drawings, in addition to what was submitted for Project Design Approval:
• All architectural and site details
• Color and material samples
• Exterior door hardware
• Fenestration (final window and door specifications)
• Exterior light fixtures (final cut sheet/locations)
• Final site grading
• Final landscape and irrigation plans
• All Conditions of Approval listed directly on the plans f. Noticing and Appeals
No mailed noticing is required. Decisions made by the Director are final and not appealable. Items referred by the Director to the SFDB for a decision may be appealed by the applicant to the Planning Commission.

1.3.5 Review After Final
a. Purpose
Review After Final (RAF) evaluates proposed changes to a project after Final Approval to ensure that any changes remain consistent with the approved design intent and are clearly documented.
b. Who Reviews
The Director reviews Review After Final applications when the revisions maintain substantial conformance with the approved project and fall within the originally approved scope of work. Minor changes may be approved administratively. Revisions that expand the project scope, introduce new design elements, or raise design concerns may be referred to the SFDB for a decision or may require the applicant to submit a new application. c. Scope of Review
Review is limited to the proposed changes. The Director (or SFDB on referral) determines whether the revisions are in substantial conformance with the approved project. Any change not shown clearly and explicitly on the submitted drawings is not considered approved.
d. Submittal Requirements
Applicants must submit revised plans clearly identifying all proposed changes and showing sufficient detail to explain how the changes affect the approved design. A Review After Final Approval submittal is subject to additional fees. e. Procedures
Minor changes that meet the criteria for substantial conformance are processed and approved administratively by the Director are processed under Chapter 30.205.155 (Review of Administrative Applications). Applicants must submit revised drawings clearly identifying all proposed changes, along with any supporting documentation needed to evaluate the revisions. Additional fees may apply.
f. Noticing and Appeals
No mailed noticing is required. Decisions made by the Director are final and not appealable. Items referred by the Director to the SFDB for a decision may be appealed by the applicant to the Planning Commission.

1.3.6 Changes to Approved Plans
a. Purpose
This section explains how the Community Development Director evaluates proposed changes to an approved project and determines whether those changes remain in substantial conformance with the approved plans. It also describes when changes may be approved administratively and when referral to the SFDB or a new application is required.
b. Broad Considerations
When determining whether a change to an approved project is in substantial conformance with the approved plans, the Community Development Director considers broad issues such as:
• Whether the original project was controversial.
• Whether the proposed changes are outside the scope of the original approval and effectively constitute a new project.
• Whether the changes would noticeably alter the public’s perception of the project.

These considerations guide whether the proposed revisions are appropriate for administrative approval or require review by the SFDB. c. Minor Changes
Minor changes are revisions that meet all substantial conformance criteria and remain within the originally approved scope of work.
• Minor changes may be approved administratively by the Director. • The Director may refer any change to the SFDB when Board input is needed to clarify design intent or resolve potential design issues. d. Major Changes
Major changes are revisions that do not meet the substantial conformance criteria. • Major changes must be reviewed by the SFDB for a revised Project Design Approval, consistent with SBMC §30.205.130 (Changes to Approved Plans). • Major changes require filing a new application when the revision introduces new project elements or expands the project beyond the original approval.

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 18 ends

1.3.7 Determining Substantial Conformance
In addition to these broad considerations, all of the following criteria must be met to determine substantial conformance. a. Conditions of Approval
The change must not conflict with findings or conditions of approval made by the SFDB or, if applicable, by the Planning Commission on appeal. b. Height
• For residences under 25 feet in height, the change must not increase the overall height by more than one foot (12 inches) above the approved height, and the total height must remain below 25 feet.
• For residences over 25 feet in height, the change must not increase the height by more than 4 inches above the approved height.
• Projects may not qualify for substantial conformance if they increase the approved height in cases where height was a concern raised during the original SFDB or Planning Commission decision.
• In all cases, building height must comply with the maximum height allowed by the zoning ordinance.
c. Floor Area
The change must not increase the approved net floor area by more than 50 square feet. d. Grading
Outside the building footprint, the change must not increase grading quantities by more than 25 cubic yards.
e. Environmental Studies
Changes must not occur within a biologically sensitive area, unless a qualified technical study demonstrates that no adverse environmental impact will occur. Changes must not create environmental effects not previously analyzed or require new mitigation measures. f. Trees
Any proposed tree removal must comply with the Administrative Approval Standards for tree removals in Section 6.3.20 (Tree Removals) of these Guidelines. g. Privacy
Changes must not add new or enlarged window or door openings within interior setbacks. Any new or expanded decks or patios must be located outside the interior setbacks.

1.4 Scope of Project Review
The SFDB has the authority to approve, conditionally approve, or deny projects within its jurisdiction. The following subsections describe how the SFDB determines the scope of its review:

1.4.1 Standard Review – Full Project Scope
When a single-unit residential project requires Design Review under the Municipal Code, the SFDB must review the entire scope of exterior work shown on the plans—not only the component that triggered the review. For example, if a second-story addition triggers Design Review and the plans also include site work, both the addition and the site work fall under SFDB’s purview.

1.4.2 Focused Review – Fences, Walls, and Gates
If the only element that requires Design Review is a fence, wall, or gate, the SFDB’s review is limited to that element only. Other exterior work on the site that would not otherwise require Design Review is not included in SFDB’s purview in a focused review.

1.4.3 Review of Unpermitted (“As-Built”) Construction
The SFDB must review unpermitted (“as-built”) work with the same degree of scrutiny applied to proposed new work. The following criteria apply:
• As-built work must comply with all adopted design guidelines or be modified to comply. • As-built work may be denied if the SFDB finds the work unacceptable. • The SFDB must evaluate the materials, craftsmanship, and architectural quality of asbuilt work when determining whether it is acceptable as constructed.

1.4.4 Manufactured Homes – Limited Review Authority
Under Government Code §65852.3, the SFDB’s Design Review authority for manufactured homes certified under the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 is limited. When SFDB review is required, the Board may evaluate only:
• Roof overhang
• Roofing material
• Siding material
Manufactured homes must meet the same zoning standards that apply to a conventional single-family residence on the same lot.

1.4.5 Reviewing Zoning Modifications
Requests for Zoning Modifications are decided by the Staff Hearing Officer or the Planning Commission, as specified in the Municipal Code. When a project requires both a Zoning Modification and SFDB review, the Board typically provides comments during Concept Review before the Modification request is heard.

The SFDB’s role is limited to commenting on the aesthetic and neighborhood compatibility aspects of the requested Modification. This includes whether the request is consistent with existing neighborhood development patterns, whether it maintains adequate light, air, and usable open space for each residence, or whether it aligns with the Single Family Residence Design Guidelines.

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 20 ends

The SFDB does not take a position for or against the Modification itself, as that is a land use decision outside the SFDB’s purview.

Example of an appropriate comment:
“The proposed Modification is/is not aesthetically appropriate. The proposed Modification does/does not raise consistency issues with Single Family Residence Design Guidelines” (Include guideline reference when applicable).

1.4.6 Subdivision Grading Plan Considerations
Subdivision grading plans involving cut or fill on lots in single-family zones must be reviewed by the SFDB, as required by the Municipal Code. After any applicable Pre-Application Review Team (PRT) review, the SFDB evaluates:
a. Site Design
Consistency with Guidelines 1, 2, 3, of the Single Family Residence Design Guidelines (SFRDG), including: lot layout and suitability for future development, building pads and envelopes, hillside protection, road and sidewalk design, pedestrian access, driveways , visitor access, connectivity, and the preservation of public scenic views. The SFDB may require supplemental materials—such as view studies, grading sections, massing diagrams, tree surveys, or additional site photographs—when needed to complete its review of the subdivision design.
b. Grading
Consistency with grading findings and SFRDG Guidelines 30 and 31, focusing on grading quantities and the placement of cut and fill to avoid visible scarring. c. Retaining Walls, Fencing, and Gates
Consistency with SFRDG Guideline 35 regarding height, length, materials, and placement.

Lot layout should follow natural terrain to avoid excessive retaining walls or unusual fence alignments. Gates must be modest in scale and compatible with neighborhood character.
d. Site Landscaping
Conceptual landscape design must align with SFRDG Guideline 1. Review includes preservation of existing trees, required mitigation of any tree removals, and appropriate site screening.
e. Site Drainage
Consistency with SFRDG Guideline 4, focusing on maximizing permeability, effectiveness of drainage, related fencing, and compliance with the Storm Water Management Program. f. Site Utilities
Placement of electrical equipment, transformers, gas meters, fire backflow prevention devices, and central mailbox locations (if applicable) are also evaluated for appropriate placement.
g. Parking Design
Consistency with SFRDG Guideline 5 on parking aesthetics. h. Privacy
Adequacy of setbacks, distance between structures, and lot layout to protect privacy and align with the Good Neighbor Guidelines.
i. Solar Access
Consistency with SFRDG Guideline 3, ensuring homes are oriented to support passive and active solar energy use. The impact of existing trees on solar potential is also considered. j. Items outside SFDB review authority
These matters fall under the Staff Hearing Officer or Planning Commission, not the SFDB:
• State Subdivision Map Act
• City’s General Plan and Municipal Code Title 27
• Allowable residential density and lot sizes
• Street design and traffic impacts
• Public Improvements
• View corridors

1.4.7 Historic Significance Evaluation
a. Overview
Evaluation and protection of archaeological or historic resources are governed by the City Charter and Municipal Code, and applicable state and federal laws. Before submitting a development application, applicants should check City records, historic surveys, and available archives to determine whether existing structures may be historically significant. Plans must identify any potentially historic features and show how the project preserves or incorporates them.
b. Procedures
The following procedures apply:
• Applicants should consult with the City’s Architectural Historian by submitting photos, basic site information, and a brief description of the proposed work so the historian can determine whether a structure over 50 years old is historically significant. If the historian determines that the structure is eligible for the Historic Resources Inventory, the project will be reviewed by the Historic Landmarks Commission (HLC) instead of the SFDB.
• If the structure itself is not historic but the project is adjacent to a historic structure or within a historic neighborhood, the SFDB must evaluate the proposal for consistency with Chapter 3.2 of the Historic Resource Design Guidelines, which apply to new construction near historic resources.

EXHIBIT

Page 22 ends

2| Meeting
Procedures

EXHIBIT

Page 24 ends

Single Family Design Board Guidelines
Meeting Procedures

2.1 General Information and Procedures

2.1.1 Meeting Dates and Location
Full Board SFDB meetings are held every other Monday at 3:00 P.M. in the David Gebhard Public Meeting Room, 630 Garden Street, Santa Barbara. Meetings are broadcast live on the local Government Access channel and on YouTube. Agenda items are scheduled as time-certain, and the final item is generally scheduled for no later than 6:00 P.M. Meeting times may shift due to postponement of items as described in Section

2.10. • The SFDB Consent Calendar is reviewed at 11:00 A.M. every other Monday in the same location. Consent meetings are not televised.
• If a holiday falls on a Monday, meetings are typically held on the following Tuesday.

Regular meetings may occasionally be canceled or special meetings scheduled. • To request accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act, contact the Planning Division at (805) 564-5470 at least 48 hours before the meeting.

2.1.2 Notice and Posting
Agendas for the Full Board and Consent Calendar are posted for public review at 630 Garden Street and are available online.
2 2.2 Agenda Organization
Full Board agendas follow a general time-certain schedule. Items may not be heard more than 15 minutes before their scheduled time. The agenda typically includes:

1. Preliminary Matters:

A. Announcements, requests for continuances or withdrawals, future or ex-agenda items, and appeals.

B. Comments from members of the public pertaining to items not on this agenda. Due to time constraints, each person is limited to two minutes.

C. Review of the minutes and Resolutions of the previous meeting D. Ratification of Consent Calendar Actions

2. Subject Items:

A. Appeals Referred Back to SFDB from Planning Commission B. One-Time Pre-Application Consultation
C. Concept Review (continued items first, followed by new items) D. Project Design Approval (continued items first, followed by new items) E. Revised Project Design Approval
F. Items Referred from the Community Development Director G. Items Referred from Consent

3. Administrative Agenda:

A. Standing and Ad Hoc Subcommittee Reports. (These reports are brief announcements and do not involve general SFDB discussion or actions. If members wish to discuss the substance of a subcommittee report, members must request that staff properly agendize the topic under “Discussion Items” at a future meeting of the SFDB.)

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 26 ends

2.2.1 Timing and Attendance Expectations
Actual timing may vary based on the length of earlier items. Attendees are encouraged to arrive at least 15 minutes before the approximate time of their item. Applicants and applicant teams are required to be present in person. Applicants who arrive late—or who are not present at all—may have their item postponed unless the Board agrees to hear it and time permits. It is the applicant’s responsibility to request rescheduling if needed.

2.3 Public Notice

2.3.1 Consent and Full Board Items
Some projects require a mailed notice before SFDB review. The purpose is to give nearby owners and occupants an opportunity to comment on proposals that may affect them. When required, notice is mailed to the applicant, owners, and occupants within 300 feet of the site, and interested parties in the City database. A “Notice of Development” sign may also be required on the site.

If a project also requires a land use decision by the City Council, Planning Commission, or Staff Hearing Officer, the first SFDB hearing must follow the notice requirements for that decision-making body. See Municipal Code for noticing requirements.

2.3.2 When Revised Plans Require Re Notice
If revised plans differ from what was previously noticed in ways that may affect neighbors or decision-makers, the Community Development Director may require a new mailed notice.

If the Director determines that changes to height, floor area, building footprint, grading quantities, or exterior massing exceed the limits allowed under the substantial-conformance criteria, the project must be re-noticed for a new hearing. Additional noticing fees may be required.

2.4 Project Presentation and Plan Substitution

2.4.1 Project Presentation by the Applicant
Applicants must present their project at both Consent and Full Board hearings. If no one is available to present on behalf of the applicant, the item must be continued to a future meeting date. This ensures that the Board can ask questions, receive clarifications, and evaluate the proposal accurately.

2.4.2 Plan Substitution and Supplemental Hearing Items
Plans submitted for a scheduled meeting must not be replaced at the hearing. Minor supplemental materials that do not require zoning review, such as changes in materials, new renderings, additional photos, color boards, or similar presentation items, may be submitted up to one week before the hearing if accepted by the Community Development Director. This requirement ensures adequate staff review and provides the public with a fair opportunity to review the revised plans before the meeting.

2.5 Public Meeting and Public Comment

2.5.1 Procedure
Each regular meeting of the SFDB must include an opportunity for general public comment on items not on the agenda, as well as item-specific public comment before the Board begins questions or discussion. The Chair will announce the start of item-specific public comment prior to SFDB questions or discussion. The SFDB Secretary will call on speakers who have submitted a request to speak or who have indicated they wish to speak on the virtual meeting platform, if applicable. Speakers are limited to no more than two minutes. The Chair may reduce the time limit based on the number of speakers and the length of the agenda.

2.5.2 Public Comment Topics
a. Appropriate Public Comment
The City encourages neighbors to coordinate their comments or select a representative to speak on their behalf. Appropriate public comment topics include:
• Aesthetic issues
• Project design and size
• Neighborhood compatibility
• Compliance with the “Good Neighbor Guidelines”
• Public views
The SFDB will consider public comments related to these topics, as well as comments relevant to the Neighborhood Compatibility Findings, including grading, tree removal, and the project’s mass, bulk, and scale.
b. Comments outside the Board’s Purview
Comments outside the SFDB’s purview should not be discussed, including:
• Land use or zone designation
• Project affordability
• Private views
• Parking, traffic, or congestion impacts
• Residential density or number of bedrooms
• Construction-related impacts

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 28 ends

2.6 Continuances, Postponements, and Referrals

2.6.1 Continuances
A continuance carries an item forward to a future meeting. To request a continuance, the applicant must attend the meeting and make a presentation. An item may be continued at the applicant’s request or by action of the SFDB. Unless more information is needed to make a required finding, the Chair should offer the applicant the option of a continuance or a decision at the current meeting.

2.6.2 Postponements
A postponement defers an agenda item to a future meeting. A postponement must be indefinite and cannot be to a date certain. No discussion or presentation occurs on the date a postponement occurs.

Applicants requesting a postponement must contact SFDB staff as early as possible before the scheduled hearing and state the reason for the request. For timely agenda processing, requests must be made before 4:30 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting.

Postponed items remain postponed indefinitely. It is the applicant’s responsibility to contact staff to reschedule the item. Re-noticing and postponement fees apply. If an application has been postponed more than twice, the SFDB may deny the application without prejudice, meaning the Board will not carry forward any concerns or opinions if the project is resubmitted.

2.6.3 Referrals
All Consent Calendar actions are subject to ratification by the Full Board. Any SFDB member may request that an item on the Consent Calendar item be referred to the Full Board and must state the reason for the referral.

Referred items must be agendized and heard by the Full Board at a later date (not same day).

2.7 Decisions

2.7.1 Project Approvals
To grant Project Design Approval, the SFDB must make the applicable findings in the Municipal Code. If a project is approved administratively by staff in accordance with these SFDB Guidelines, findings are not required.

2.7.2 Project Denials
The SFDB may deny a project that is inconsistent with any applicable finding. The motion for denial must state the specific findings that cannot be made and the reasons those findings are not met.

When state housing law (e.g., SB 330) limits the City’s design review authority, the SFDB may deny a project only if it makes the written, evidence-based findings required under state law.

2.8 Appeals, Extensions, and Expirations

2.8.1 Time Limits and Extensions
Consistent with Chapter 30.205 (Common Procedures)the following time limits apply:
a. Concept Review
Concept Review comments are valid for one year from the hearing date, or at the Community Development Director’s discretion. b. Project Design Approval
A Project Design Approval is valid for three years from the approval date and will automatically expire unless the applicant pulls a building permit or receives a time extension before it expires.
c. Multiple Approvals
When a project requires multiple discretionary approvals, the overall expiration date is tied to the longest approval, except that design review approvals run from the date of Project Design Approval and do not extend any other permit. Any extension of a discretionary land use approval automatically extends the related design review approval. d. Time Extensions
The Community Development Director may extend an SFDB Project Design Approval with either two one year extensions or one two year extension.

2.8.2 Appeal of SFDB Decision
Any SFDB action on a Project Design Review application may be appealed to the Planning Commission under SBMC §30.220.005 and Chapter 1.30 of the Municipal Code.

To file an appeal, the applicant must submit a letter stating the reasons for the appeal, along with the required fee, within ten (10) calendar days of the contested action.

2.8.3 Re-Filing a Denied Project Design
If a denied project design is re-filed within one year, the revised submittal must address and mitigate the reason for the prior denial. A new application and new application fees are required.

EXHIBIT

Page 30 ends

3| Meeting
Conduct

EXHIBIT

Page 32 ends

Single Family Design Board Guidelines
3 Meeting Conduct

3.1 Officer Election

3.1.1 Chair
The SFDB must elect a Chair from its members each year. Elections must occur as soon as practical after January 1, or whenever the Chair position becomes vacant.

3.1.2 Vice-Chair
After electing the Chair, the SFDB must elect a Vice-Chair. The Vice-Chair conducts meetings when the Chair is absent.

3.2 Subcommittees/Advisory Committees
The SFDB must not establish a subcommittee without the approval of the Community Development Director and City Attorney.

3.3 General Meeting Conduct

3.3.1 Rosenberg’s Rules of Order
Rosenberg’s Rules of Order govern how SFDB meetings are conducted unless these Guidelines state otherwise or the Chair determines that a different procedure is appropriate for a specific meeting.

3.3.2 Brown Act
SFDB meetings, including meetings of any standing subcommittees, must follow the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Section 54950 et seq.). The Brown Act establishes requirements for public notice, agendas, and public participation.

3.3.3 Ex-Parte Communication
SFDB members must not initiate or encourage private discussions about specific projects with applicants or with groups of two or more SFDB members. Any ex-parte communication that does occur must be disclosed at the next regularly scheduled meeting.

3.3.4 Quorum Requirements
• A quorum consists of three SFDB members.
• A member who is present but abstains from voting counts toward the quorum. • A member who steps down due to a conflict of interest must leave the room and does not count toward the quorum.
• Any member with a disqualifying conflict under the Political Reform Act must step down and must not be counted toward a quorum.

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 34 ends

3.3.5 Abstention on Continued Items
A member who was absent at a previous review of a project should only comment or vote if they have:
• reviewed the previous plans,
• watched the video of the prior hearing, and
• read the minutes related to that project.

If the member has not reviewed this information, they should abstain.

For Consent Calendar and minor items reviewed only briefly, members must read the minutes and review the plans, since there is no video recording of Consent meetings.

3.3.6 Reconsideration
• A motion to reconsider an SFDB action may be made only at the same meeting or at the next regular meeting.
• Only a member who voted on the prevailing side of the original action may make the motion.
• To meet Brown Act requirements, if the motion is not made at the same meeting, the member must submit a written request to Staff before the end of the second business day following the original meeting so that the motion can be placed on the next regular agenda.

3.3.7 Conflict of Interest Compliance
Members must follow all applicable conflict-of-interest laws, including the Political Reform Act of 1974. Members must not participate in decisions when they have a disqualifying conflict of interest.

3.3.8 Staff Assistance
Staff assist both the SFDB and the public throughout the review process. Staff comments must be presented at the start of each item’s review.

3.3.9 Member Attendance
If a member cannot attend a meeting or must step down from a specific item due to a conflict of interest, the member must notify Staff as early as possible. The purpose of early notice is to help ensure the SFDB maintains a quorum.

3.3.10 Member Compensation
SFDB members may receive meeting attendance compensation as authorized in the Community Development Department’s approved budget.

3.3.11 Site Visits
The SFDB may conduct site visits when additional on-site information is needed before commenting on or acting on a project. Staff must notify SFDB members and the public of scheduled, organized, or drive-by site visits through a notation on the meeting agenda.

3.3.12 Story Pole and Site Visit Coordination
For projects requiring both design review and another land use approval, timing of story pole installation and site visits must be coordinated with the Planning Commission or the Staff Hearing Officer, as applicable.

EXHIBIT

Page 36 ends

4| Application
Requirements
and Visual Aids

EXHIBIT

Page 38 ends

Single Family Design Board Guidelines
4 Application Requirements
and Visual Aids

4.1 Application Requirements

4.1.1 Overview
Applications for Design Review must follow the procedures outlined in SBMC Chapter 30.205 (Common Procedures) and SBMC Chapter 30.220 (Design Review).

Applications must be submitted by the property owner or an authorized agent. If an agent applies, the application must include written proof of authorization to act for the owner.

4.1.2 Public Record
All application materials become part of the public record and, unless prohibited by law, are available for public review during normal business hours.

4.1.3 How to Submit
Application forms and checklists are available on the City’s Forms & Applications webpage. Applications, including all supporting plans and documents, must be submitted electronically through the City’s online system.

4.1.4 Required Content
A complete Design Review application must include all required plans, such as a site plan, floor plans, roof plan, building elevations, building sections, grading plans (if applicable), and any other drawings identified in the submittal checklist. Applicants must submit the current City application forms, project description, plan sheets in the required formatting, and all technical documentation identified for the project type. These materials must be accurate, internally consistent, drawn to required scales, and prepared according to the City’s submittal standards.

Applications must also include any information or evidence needed to support the applicable findings.

This may include:
• Visual aids (see Sections 4.2 and 4.4)
• Environmental documentation
• Written statements explaining how the project meets the findings.

4.2 When Supplemental Visual Aids Are Required
Supplemental visual aids provide additional information to help the SFDB, staff, and the public understand a project’s height, massing, neighborhood context, and potential visual impacts. See the Visual Aids Supplemental Application for complete submittal requirements, standards, and formatting instructions.

A project must provide one or more supplemental visual aids listed in Section 4.4. (Types of Visual Aids) before Project Design Approval when any of the following conditions apply:

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 40 ends

4.2.1 Second Stories
At least one supplemental visual aid is required when a project includes a new two-or-more story building, or an expanded second or higher story, or alterations to a building over 17 feet in height, and meets at least one of the following conditions:
• Upper Story Size. The new or expanded upper story floor area is 250 square feet or larger. • Height Increase. The new or expanded upper story, or alterations over 17 feet in height, increases the existing building height by more than 5 feet.

4.2.2 High FAR Projects (Over 85% FAR)
Projects proposed at more than 85% of the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) must include a Neighborhood Context Study and at least one other supplemental visual aid.

4.2.3 FAR Exceptions (Over 100% FAR)
Projects proposing an FAR Exception to be over 100% of the maximum floor area ratio (FAR) must include at least one supplemental visual aid and must install “Full Level” story poles at least seven calendar days before Project Design Review. See Section 4.5 (Story Pole Requirements).

4.2.4 Large Grading Projects
Projects proposing more than 500 cubic yards of grading outside of the main building footprint must include a 3D massing model or 3D topographic/grading model showing proposed terrain changes.

4.2.5 Terraced or Elevated Sites
At least one supplemental visual aid is required when terracing or grading creates a 4-foot vertical difference greater than four feet between the adjacent street right-of-way and the finished grade along the front lot line.

4.2.6 Ridgelines, Scenic Views, and Hillside Exposure
A supplemental visual aid is required when the project is located in an area with elevated visual sensitivity based on mapped or measurable topographic conditions including:
a. Ridgeline Vertical Proximity
The highest point of the proposed structure is within 15 feet vertically of a mapped ridgeline.
b. Ridgeline Horizontal Proximity
Any portion of the proposed roof form is within 150 horizontal feet of a mapped ridgeline and not fully screened by existing development or vegetation. c. Scenic View Corridor
The project is located within a mapped Scenic View Corridor identified in an adopted City document.

4.2.7 Setback Modifications
Projects requesting zoning modifications into required setbacks must include at least one supplemental visual aid.

4.2.8 SFDB Difficulty Making Required Findings
If one or more SFDB members state that due to insufficient information they cannot make required Project Compatibility Findings, the applicant must submit supporting visual aid materials as specified by the Board. An applicant’s failure to provide the SFDB with sufficient visual information may result in a denial at Project Design Review.

4.2.9 Other Review Bodies
Story poles or other visual aids may also be required by the Planning Commission, Staff Hearing Officer, or during environmental review. When more than one decision-making body requires visual aids, the most stringent applicable requirement applies.

4.3 Visual Aids Waiver
During Concept Review, or before the application is deemed complete, supplemental visual aids may be waived by:
• The SFDB, for Full Board projects, or
• The Community Development Director, for projects eligible for Consent or Administrative approval.

A waiver may be granted only when the standard submittal materials or other available visual aids clearly show the building’s height, massing, and relationship to nearby development.

4.4Types of Visual Aids
Supplemental visual aids help the public and the SFDB understand a project’s height, massing, neighborhood context, and potential visual impacts. Detailed preparation requirements, viewpoints, formatting, and documentation are provided in the Visual Aids Supplemental Application.

The following types of visual aids may be required:

4.4.1 Neighborhood Context Study
A study showing the project’s relationship to surrounding parcels using aerial photographs, keyed site photos, and basic neighborhood data such as building heights, number of stories, parcel sizes, zoning, and lot coverage. This study helps evaluate neighborhood compatibility and scale.

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 42 ends

4.4.2 Photo Simulations (Renders)
Scaled images showing the proposed building accurately overlaid onto site or contextual photographs. These include required public vantage points such as streets, parks, beaches, and mapped scenic view corridors.

4.4.3 Streetscape Context Elevations
Scaled drawings showing the proposed building in relation to adjacent or representative nearby structures across a continuous streetscape. These may include silhouettes, rendered building elevations, or drawings placed on photographic background.

4.4.4 Perspective Drawings
Three-dimensional drawings from human-eye level showing the project’s building form, plate heights, rooflines, and surrounding development, illustrating how the project appears from key public viewpoints.

4.4.5 Three-Dimensional Massing / Topographic Models
Physical or digital 3D models showing building form, major volumes, rooflines, and any proposed grading or terrain changes. These models illustrate massing, height, and topography without requiring photorealistic detail.

4.4.6 Story Poles
Temporary on-site markers showing the proposed building’s height and massing, installed according to Section 4.5.

4.5 Story Pole Requirements
Story poles illustrate the proposed building’s height, massing, and rooflines on site. • When story poles are required for SFDB review, Full Level installation is the default. • The SFDB may reduce to Standard Level or Basic Level, or waive the requirement, at a Concept Review hearing based on the criteria in Section 4.3 (Visual Aids Waiver). • If Planning Commission, Staff Hearing Officer, or CEQA visual analysis requires story poles the SFDB cannot waive or reduce the story pole requirement. The most stringent applicable requirement governs.

4.5.1 Levels of Story Pole Installation
a. Full Level
Show all major building forms, corners, ridges, eaves, rakes, outer plate heights (not the outer edge of the eaves), and ridgelines with vertical poles and string lines. b. Standard Level
Show selected building forms (as determined by the SFDB) with vertical poles and, if requested, string lines.
c. Basic Level
Show selected locations at highest building elements (as determined by the SFDB) with vertical poles only.

4.5.2 Story Pole Timing and Documentation
a. Standard Timing
Story pole installations must be completed a minimum of 7 days prior to the Project Design Review hearing and must remain in place until the hearing. b. Photographic Record
Once installed, the applicant must photograph the story poles from all angles visible to the public. Additional photos from more distant points may be required. c. Post-Construction Documentation
Before issuance of Final Inspection/Certificate of Occupancy, submit photographs of the completed building from the same locations used for the story pole documentation.

EXHIBIT

Page 44 ends

5| Landscape
Design
Guidelines

EXHIBIT

Page 46 ends

Single Family Design Board Guidelines
5 Landscape Design Guidelines

5.1 Purpose
The Landscape Design Guidelines provide general and specific direction for designing and installing throughout single-family neighborhoods. Landscaping should be used to unify the project design, enhance the site, and support compatibility with surrounding development while complying with applicable City policies and regulations.

5.2 Landscape Plan Applicability and Requirements

5.2.1 Applicability
A landscape plan is required for the following SFDB projects:
• When a landscape plan is required under SBMC Chapter 14.23 (Landscape Design Standards and Recycled Water Use).
• When a project either alters or adds required landscape areas, or requests a waiver, under SBMC 30.140.118 (Landscape).
• Subdivision grading plans in Residential Single Unit Zones. • Any grading permit when not submitted in connection with a building permit for construction or alteration on the same lot.
• Vegetation Removal Permits under SBMC Chapter 22.10.
• Alterations to Approved Landscape Plans under SBMC Chapter 22.11. • Landscape Design Standards Waiver under SBMC 30.140.118 (Landscape).

The SFDB may also require a landscape plan when necessary to determine consistency with applicable findings.

5.2.2 Landscape Plan Contents
Landscape plans must contain the information required in the City’s the Landscape Plan Submittal Guide.

5.2.3 Landscape Plan Preparation Licensing Requirements a. License Required
Per Business and Professions Code (BPC) §5641, the following construction-level plans must be prepared by a licensed landscape architect, registered or licensed engineer, architect, land surveyor, or a landscape contractor who is contracted to install the landscaping:
• Final grading or drainage plans
• Construction details, specifications, or plans for tangible landscape features These requirements include grading or drainage plans prepared for Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) compliance. b. No License Required
In the following circumstances, plans may be prepared by an unlicensed person:
• Property owners preparing plans for their own property (BPC §5641.1). • Concept Review Plans for a single family dwelling (BPC §5641). • Project Design Review Plans that do not require grading or drainage plans (BPC §5641). • Irrigation Plans prepared by property owners or irrigation consultants (BPC §5641.6).

Advisory. The SFDB may suggest, but cannot require, the use of a licensed landscape architect when plan submittals are inadequate or when the project involves extensive grading, revegetation, or sensitive habitat areas.

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 48 ends

5.3 General Landscape Design Guidelines
Landscape is an integral part of a project’s design and helps maintain neighborhood character.

Landscape plans should enhance site aesthetics, complement architecture, and provide screening, usable outdoor space, water-wise planting, and efficient irrigation.

The following guidelines apply to all landscape proposals:

5.3.1 Site Layout and Massing
a. Landscape Coverage
Landscape massing must provide substantial plant landscaping relative to hardscape.

Paved areas should be minimized and planting areas maximized. b. Screening
Screening plants, such as hedges, may be used to provide privacy between neighbors.

Species must fit the space at maturity and comply with applicable hedge height standards in the Zoning Ordinance. c. Trees
Mature canopy trees must be provided for shade and weather protection, where appropriate. d. Limit Lawn Size
Use turf/lawn grass only where necessary for recreational uses. Consider natural lawn-alternative species.

5.3.2 Plant Selection
a. Blend with Existing Vegetation
New plants should blend with existing vegetation in type, coloring, and scale. b. Growth
Select and place plants to:
• Minimize blocking of adjacent properties’ primary scenic views and solar access. • Achieve desired screening without requiring excessive pruning. • Maintain scale compatible with public view preservation policies. c. Adaptability (“Right Plant / Right Place”)
Plants must be appropriate for site conditions, including soil, slope, climate, and available space. d. Native Plants
Use native plants whenever possible. When using non-native species, prioritize Mediterranean -climate plants. e. Fire Resistant Landscape
Use fire resistant landscaping where feasible. See Section 3.6 and the City’s High Fire Hazard Area resources for required plant lists.
f. Invasive Plants
Avoid invasive species, especially near sensitive habitats. Refer to the California Invasive Plant Council (www.cal-ipc.org) for a list of invasive plants. g. Plant Spacing & Height
Space plants to accommodate mature size without crowding or root conflict. Select plants with appropriate mature plant height.
h. Group by Plant Needs
Group plants with similar water and sun requirements into hydrozones with appropriate irrigation valve types.
i. Natural Plants
Landscaping must use live plant material. Artificial plants and artificial turf are prohibited in parkways. Artificial turf may be considered in less visible private areas but is generally discouraged.

5.3.3 Sustainability Principles
Landscape and irrigation design should incorporate sustainable practices, including:
• Preserve existing vegetation and significant trees (see Section 5.4). • Protect natural features and revegetate graded areas promptly. • Use landscaping to assist with passive heating and cooling. • Avoid nonnative species that add weight to steep slopes; prefer deep-rooted species for stability.
• Comply with water-efficient landscape requirements in SBMC Chapter 14.23. • Minimize waste in landscape planning and materials.
• Follow Stormwater Management Program (SWMP) principles by incorporating bioswales, porous paving, rain gardens, and onsite infiltration strategies. • Maximize permeability and onsite percolation using BMPs. • Use natural drainage features such as swales, vditches, and drywells to direct and manage flows.

5.3.4 Street and Driveway Design
a. Grading & Retaining Walls
Minimize grading and avoid unnecessary retaining walls. b. Limit Paving
Limit driveway widths and consider permeable materials. Consult the Fire Department and Transportation Division before proposing alternative paving (ribbon driveways, permeable pavers and other materials).
c. Garage Orientation
Orient driveways and garages to present a street-friendly facade, so that garage or carport openings are not facing directly onto streets.

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 50 ends

d. Sidewalk Widths
Provide street sidewalk widths that allow landscaped parkways to buffer pedestrians from street traffic.
e. Street Trees
Incorporate City street trees as recommended by the SFDB, City Arborist, and the Street Tree Master Plan. Removal requires Parks & Recreation Commission approval. Consult with the Parks & Recreation Department for information on Street Trees. f. Planting in Parkways
Water-wise plants are required and turf is prohibited in parkways. Use drip irrigation or low precipitation systems to avoid runoff. See the City’s list of recommended plants for parkways on the City website.

5.4 Tree Preservation
Protecting existing trees, especially mature and native trees, is a primary design goal. Mature trees must be integrated into project design whenever feasible, and all reasonable preservation and protection measures must be considered before removal is proposed. Tree removal and replacement may require Design Review, Street Tree Advisory Committee and Parks & Recreation Commission review, and/or a building permit. The following standards apply to any project involving tree removal or replacement.

5.4.1 General Tree Replacement Standards
If preservation of existing trees is not possible, replacement trees must be provided according to the ratios and size standards below.
a. Tree Replacement Ratios
Trees measuring 4 inches or more in diameter (measured 4 feet 6 inches above grade) that are proposed for removal must be replaced onsite at a minimum 1:1 ratio, unless environmental review determines that a different ratio is appropriate. • The standard mitigation ratio for tree loss is 3:1.
• Ratios may be increased up to 10:1 depending on tree species, lot size, and the size and expected survival of replacement trees.
b. Tree Replacement Size
The required replacement size will be determined through environmental review, in coordination with SFDB review, based on the size and biological value of the tree being removed and onsite conditions. See Section 5.4.2 for additional standards.

5.4.2 Tree Protection and Replacement Standards
Efforts must be made to preserve existing trees—particularly native species such as oaks—consistent with applicable City policies (Environmental Resources Element ER11 and ER12; 1979 Conservation Element Visual and Biological Resources policies). Projects involving work near existing trees are subject to the following standards:
a. Earth Disturbance Prohibitions
No earth disturbance is allowed within a radius from the trunk equal to one-third of the tree’s canopy radius. Example: If the canopy extends 30 feet from the trunk, no work may occur within the inner 10 feet. In the remaining canopy/dripline area, soil may only be disturbed with hand tools.
b. Arborist’s Report
Work within a tree’s dripline or within a distance that may affect the tree’s root zone requires an Arborist’s Report. When an Arborist’s Report is required, the SFDB may base its conditions of approval on the report’s recommendations. c. Paving
Paving or other non-permeable surfaces under native tree canopies must be minimized.

For oak trees:
• No more than 25% of the area beneath the canopy may be paved. • Paving under the canopy must be installed by hand or using hand tools due to the sensitivity of surface roots.
d. Distance from Structures
The edge of all new structures must be placed at least 5 feet outside the expected mature canopy/dripline of a native tree, unless approved with an Arborist’s Report. e. Protection Notes
Projects that include work within or adjacent to the dripline of an existing native tree must include Tree Protection notes on all site and grading plans. f. Replacement Dimensions
If removal of a native tree is approved, each required replacement tree must have a trunk diameter equal to or greater than one-quarter of the diameter of the removed tree.

Example: A 16-inch oak must be replaced with a tree at least 4 inches in diameter.

Smaller sizes may be allowed when replacement availability is limited. g. Tree Root Barrier Guideline
The SFDB may recommend or condition that the applicant consult a qualified tree expert (landscape architect, City Arborist, or certified arborist) to determine whether a root barrier is appropriate.

Root barriers may be required when roots will be within 4 feet of any hardscape and may affect buildings, sidewalks, pathways, or curbs.
• Palm trees do not require root barriers.
• Root barriers are not recommended when existing trees are nearby, because installation may damage existing root.

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 52 ends

h. Condition of Approval for Specific Tree or Planting
The SFDB may conditionally approve projects requiring maintenance of specific trees or plantings. Trees or plantings identified for retention on an approved landscape plan may not be altered without Design Review or a permit.

5.5 Special Areas

5.5.1 Hillside Residential Landscape Design
Landscape in hillside areas must respect both public views toward the project and views from the subject property. Plantings should soften the appearance of new homes, major additions, and retaining walls. The following guidelines apply to hillside areas:
a. Appearance
Landscaping must reduce the visual mass of structures when viewed from public areas.

Plantings should be selected from California native or Mediterranean species that blend with the hillside. Species that visually contrast with natural terrain (e.g., palms along ridgelines or large expanses of brightly colored vines) are discouraged in publicly visible locations.
b. Natural Surroundings
Disturbance to oak woodlands, steep slopes, bluffs, creeks, watersheds, and other native habitats must be evaluated by a qualified professional to determine appropriate plant selection and maintenance that minimize impacts on natural areas. c. Grading
Grading should be minimized.
d. Slope Failure Mitigation
If slope instability occurs, recommendations from a soils engineer, geologist, or landscape architect is required for plantings, irrigation, and erosion control. e. Erosion Control Measures
Erosion control measures must be included on hillside landscape plans.

5.5.2 Creeks and Wetlands
Projects near creeks and wetlands must comply with the guidelines below and be consistent with the sustainability principles in Section 5.3.3.
a. Degradation Prohibition
Development adjacent to creeks or wetlands must not degrade the waterway or its riparian environment.
b. Native Plant Species
Native vegetation along creeks and wetlands must be protected, maintained, enhanced, and restored.
c. Immediately Adjacent Landscaping
Only native, non-invasive plants may be installed immediately adjacent to creeks and wetlands. A licensed landscape architect or biologist should provide plant recommendations. If the project impacts a creek or wetland, a biologist must prepare a restoration plan.
d. Buffer Landscaping
Vegetative buffers must be provided between natural areas and developed or high-use areas. Buffer vegetation should be native to California.

5.5.3 High Fire Hazard Area Landscape Design
a. Defensible Space
Projects must meet defensible space requirements in the Fire Code and comply with the Fire Department’s High Fire Hazard Area Landscape Requirements. These standards identify drought-tolerant, fire-resistant species and placement requirements to reduce wildfire risk. Consultation with the Fire Department’s Wildland Fire Specialist is recommended b. Native and Fire Resistant Vegetation
Native or fire-resistant vegetation must be used on major cut-and-fill slopes within hillside development areas. Within Vegetation Management Units identified in the Community Wildfire Protection Plan, vegetation must be designed to reduce flammable plant materials. Consultation with the Wildland Fire Specialist is recommended.

EXHIBIT

Page 54 ends

6| Administrative
Approval
Standards

EXHIBIT

Page 56 ends

Single Family Design Board Guidelines
6 Administrative Approval
Standards

6.1 Administrative Approval Procedures

6.1.1 Procedure
Projects may be reviewed and approved administratively by the Community Development Director—without SFDB review—if the project meets all applicable Administrative Approval Standards in Sections 6.2 (Project-Specific Standards) and 6.3 (General Standards).

Administrative approval is a ministerial action. Projects are not eligible for administrative approval if:
• The project may create a risk of an adverse environmental effect, or • The project requires public noticing under SBMC §30.220.040.

The Community Development Director may approve, conditionally approve, or deny a project submitted for administrative approval.
a. Evaluating Projects Using the Administrative Approval Standards To determine whether a project may be approved administratively, staff must use the following procedure:

1. Review the scope of work and plan sheets to identify which Project-Specific Administrative Approval Standards apply.

2. Evaluate each portion of the scope of work for consistency with the criteria in the applicable project-specific standards (Section 6.2).

3. Evaluate each portion of the scope of work for consistency with the General Administrative Approval Standards (Section 6.3).

4. If the project meets all applicable project-specific standards and all general standards, it may be eligible for administrative approval.
b. Example
If a project includes a first-story addition, a new window, a pool, and new landscape, staff must review the corresponding project-specific standards in Section 6.3:
• First-Story Additions (6.3.2)
• Hardscape & Landscape Alterations (6.3.10)
• Pools and Spas (6.3.14)
• Windows (6.3.22)
The project must also meet the applicable general standards in Section 6.2:
• Design Style (6.2.1)
• Alterations (6.2.2)
• Colors (6.2.3)
• Scale (6.2.4)
• Landscape (6.2.5)
• Consideration of Neighbors (6.2.6)
• Changes to Approved Plans (6.2.7)
• Home Hardening (6.2.8)

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 58 ends

Note: Even if a project meets all applicable project specific and general standards, staff may refer the application to the SFDB if the project raises potential neighborhood compatibility concerns.

6.2 General Administrative Approval Standards
To be eligible for administrative staff review, a project must comply with the following general standards in addition to all applicable project-specific standards in section 6.3.

6.2.1 Design Style
The architectural style must be clearly stated on the plans. The design must either match the building’s existing style or result in a cohesive new style. Staff will verify style consistency by reviewing architectural elements such as windows, doors, lighting, railings, trim, eaves, roof pitch, proportions, and materials.

Staff may reference A Field Guide to American Houses or similar resources to confirm the proposed style classification. Proposed exterior materials must visually match or be consistent with the stated style.

6.2.2 Alterations
Alterations must match the current architectural style or produce a single, cohesive style.

Projects that introduce multiple exterior changes may be approved administratively if the design intent is clear and the overall style is unified.

6.2.3 Colors
Additions must match existing colors. Simple color changes may be approved administratively if they use colors from the Santa Barbara Colors Guide. Bright or incompatible colors do not qualify for administrative approval.

6.2.4 Scale
Additions must be compatible with the scale of the house, architectural style, and neighborhood. Staff will evaluate scale using criteria such as visibility, plate heights, roof pitch, and maximum building height. See SFRDG 17-C for additional guidance. Projects that are out of character with the neighborhood or poorly sited will be referred to the SFDB.

6.2.5 Landscape
Changes to an approved landscape plan must be consistent with the original planting purpose, such as privacy screening, shade, solar access, interest, historic preservation, erosion control, or appropriate species near sensitive habitat areas.

6.2.6 Consideration of Neighbors
Projects must generally conform to the Good Neighbor Guidelines in the Single Family Residence Design Guidelines. Development must be sited and oriented to minimize privacy impacts and reduce potential noise or lighting issues.

6.2.7 Changes to Approved Plans
Minor changes may be approved administratively if they meet the criteria in Section 1.3.7 (Changes to Approved Plans – Determining Substantial Conformance). Changes that do not substantially conform must be referred back to the SFDB for revised Project Design Approval.

6.2.8 Home Hardening (fire-resistant construction).

Projects in High Fire Hazard Areas must comply with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code or use materials listed on the State Fire Marshal Wildland Urban Interface Products list.

Examples include:
• Class A fire-rated roofing systems
• Dual-pane windows with at least one tempered pane
• Fire-retardant decking materials within 10 feet of the structure Projects in High Fire Hazard Areas may receive greater design flexibility related to materials.

6.3 Project-Specific Administrative Approval Standards
Projects requesting administrative approval must meet all applicable project-specific standards in this section, as well as the General Administrative Approval Standards in Section 6.2. See the table below to help navigate to the standards applicable to your project. Applicable project elements include:

6.3.1 Accessory Buildings (Excluding ADUs)

6.3.2 Additions: First Story

6.3.3 Additions: Second or Higher Story

6.3.4 Awnings

6.3.5 Chimneys

6.3.6 Color Changes: Exterior

6.3.7 Decks

6.3.8 Doors

6.3.9 Fences and Site Walls (Excluding
Retaining Walls)

6.3.10 Hardscape and Landscape
Alterations, Including Grading

6.3.11 Lighting: Exterior

6.3.12 Mechanical Equipment: General

6.3.13 Mechanical Equipment: Rooftop

6.3.14 Pools and Spas

6.3.15 Porches

6.3.16 Retaining Walls

6.3.17 Roofs and Reroofs

6.3.18 Screening and Screening Waivers

6.3.19 Skylights

6.3.20 Tree Removal

6.3.21 Tree Removal: Emergency or
Hazardous

6.3.22 Trellises, Pergolas, Patio Covers,
and Sunshades

6.3.23 Windows

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 60 ends

6.3.1 Accessory Buildings (Excluding ADUs)
New, altered, or expanded accessory buildings (not Accessory Dwelling Units) may be approved administratively if all of the following standards are met:

1. The building is 800 square feet or less.

2. The building does is one story or 17 feet or less in height.

3. The project does not exceed 85% of the Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR).

4. Any mechanical equipment complies with subsections 6.3.12 (General) and 6.3.13 (Rooftop).

5. The accessory building does not include a roof deck.

6. Carports use supporting columns at least 4 inches in diameter (thin support poles are not eligible).

7. Accessory buildings are not located in the front yard. • Exception: Carports and garages, including garage conversions, may be approved in the front yard only if they are not publicly visible due to site topography or existing or proposed screening.

8. If publicly visible, accessory buildings must match the architectural style of the main house. If not publicly visible, style matching is not required.

6.3.2 Additions: First Story
First-story additions may be approved administratively if all the following standards are met:

1. Additions and related alterations are less than 17 feet in height.

2. On lots developed with less than 4,000 sq ft of net floor area, the addition is 800 square feet or less.

3. On lots developed with 4,000 square feet or more of net floor area, the addition is 250 square feet or less.

4. The project does not exceed 85% of the Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR).

5. Any retaining walls proposed with the addition comply with the development standards for retaining walls in the Zoning Ordinance and Section 6.3.16 (Retaining Walls).

6. The project does not include a vegetated roof.

7. The addition does not significantly alter the front or street-facing façade’s massing, scale, or architectural style.

8. In the Hillside Design District, the addition does not result in a taller apparent height than the existing structure (see Section 29, p. 53-H of the Single Family Residence Design Guidelines for apparent height).

6.3.3 Additions: Second or Higher Story
New second story additions on existing one-story residences are not eligible for administrative approval. Additions to existing second or higher stories may be reviewed and approved administratively if the following standards are met.

1. Addition is 250 square feet or less.

2. The project does not exceed 85% of the Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR).

3. Any retaining walls proposed with the addition comply with the development standards for retaining walls in the Zoning Ordinance and Section 6.3.16 (Retaining Walls).

4. The project does not include a vegetated roof.

5. The addition does not significantly alter the front or street-facing façade’s massing, scale, or architectural style.

6. In the Hillside Design District, the addition does not result in a taller apparent height than the existing structure (see Section 29, p. 53-H of the Single Family Residence Design Guidelines for apparent height).

6.3.4Awnings
Awnings up to 9 square feet over windows or doors may be approved administratively if they match the style and colors of the house. Shiny or reflective materials are not allowed. See Section 6.3.22 for patio cover standards.

6.3.5 Chimneys
The following standards must be met for administrative approval:

1. The chimney matches the style of the house and uses masonry, stone, stucco, or metal pipe.

2. Wood material is not used on chimneys.

3. Metal flues have a traditional design and are painted to match the roof color.

4. Exposed pipe beyond the top of the chimney is limited to the minimum height required by Building & Safety.

6.3.6 Color Changes: Exterior
The project is consistent with General Administrative Approval Standards, Colors (6.2.3)

6.3.7 Decks
Decks are defined pursuant to SBMC §30.300.040 “D”. Rooftop decks are not eligible for administrative approval. Other decks may be approved if all of the following are met:

1. First story decks are no larger than 400 square feet.

2. Elevated decks are no larger than 250 square feet.

3. Elevated decks are at least 15 feet from any interior lot line.

4. Deck railings meet, but do not exceed, the minimum required by the Building Code.

5. Wood decks are left natural or finished with a neutral or wood-tone color stain or sealer or painted to match the color of the house or trim. Non-wood decks use high-quality materials such as a wood-simulating composite in neutral or earth tone in color.

6. Shiny or reflective decking and railing materials are prohibited. Glass railing may be approved if treated to eliminate glare.

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 62 ends

6.3.8 Doors
Administrative approval requires:

1. For double doors, both doors and sidelights have equal width.

2. Doors and sidelights are centered or symmetrically placed within architectural elements when that is appropriate for the architectural style.

6.3.9 Fences and Site Walls (Except Retaining Walls)
Administrative approval requires:

1. The following materials are not eligible: chicken wire, sheet metal (except quality COR TEN/weathering steel), corrugated metal, plastic, vinyl, wire mesh fence materials, gabion wall (rock and wire mesh) and unfaced cement block.

2. Wood, chain-link, and picket fences must be 8 feet tall or less. Masonry, stucco-finished block, stone, concrete, plastered CMU, or similar site walls must be less than 5 feet tall.

3. Height added to existing fences must match existing fence materials and contribute to a cohesive fence design.

4. If the fence is constructed of wood, it is constructed of smooth cedar, redwood, high-quality pressure-treated pine, or comparable material and left in a natural condition to weather or is treated with a neutral or wood color stain or sealer, or painted as described in number 4 below.

5. If the fence is proposed to be painted, the paint color either matches the predominant color of the siding or trim of the main building or is painted a neutral/earth tone color to blend with the surroundings.

6. If the fence is constructed of chain link, it is dark colored or hot dip galvanized chain link fencing located outside of any front yard. Chain link fences that are publicly visible must be screened with vegetation such as vines or shrubs to soften the appearance of the fence.

6.3.10 Hardscape and Landscape Alterations, Including Grading Alterations including walkways, on-grade patios, driveways, planters, barbecues, firepits, fountains, and other yard amenities may be approved if they meet the following criteria:

1. Grading outside the building footprint does not exceed 50 cubic yards.

2. No grading on slopes averaging 15% or more.

3. No alterations on slopes of 30% or more.

4. No grading within required setbacks.

5. Driveway paving is limited to what is required for access per the City’s Access & Parking Design Standards.

6. Paving materials are concrete, asphalt, pavers, flagstone, or similar in neutral or earth tone colors.

7. New paved parking areas are screened from public view using fencing, landscaping, or other approved structures.

8. Planting changes must generally match the original planting intent and does not change a condition of approval.

9. No alterations within 50 feet of the top of the creek bank or within an established creek buffer.

10. A vegetation removal permit is not triggered (SBMC Chapter 22.10)

11. Any retaining walls meet SBMC §30.140.110.G and the standards in Section 6.3.16.

12. No alterations in an environmentally sensitive habitat area unless a qualified study confirms no adverse impact.

6.3.11 Lighting: Exterior
Administrative approval requires that lighting fixtures and placement meet all Outdoor Lighting Ordinance standards (SBMC Chapter 22.75), including shielding to limit sky glow and prevent light spill onto neighboring properties.

6.3.12 Mechanical Equipment: General
The following criteria must be met for administrative approval:

1. Property-line noise levels comply with the Noise Ordinance (SBMC Chapter 9.16).

2. Equipment is screened per Municipal Code, and landscaping used for screening is shown on plans and maintained.

3. New equipment attached to a structure is not publicly visible. Attached mechanical equipment that is publicly visible is not eligible.

6.3.13 Mechanical Equipment: Rooftop
Telecommunications facilities and antennas are not eligible for administrative approvals Other rooftop equipment must meet the following criteria for administrative approval:

1. Equipment is screened per the Municipal Code and is integrated into the building design.

2. If equipment remains visible or uses only vegetation for screening, it must be painted to match the roof or background as specified by staff.

6.3.14 Pools and Spas
Material excavated for a below-grade pool, or within 5 feet of a building foundation that must be recompacted, is not counted as grading outside the footprint.

Above-ground pools may only be approved if not publicly visible. Pools and spas may be approved if all criteria below are met:

1. The pool or spa is screened or not publicly visible.

2. Site grading outside the footprint of the pool or spa does not exceed 50 cubic yards.

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 64 ends

3. Any retaining walls associated with the pool or spa must meet the administrative approval standards for retaining walls in subsection 6.3.16.

4. Any proposed mechanical equipment meets the mechanical equipment administrative approval criteria listed in subsection 6.3.12 and 6.3.13.

6.3.15 Porches
Residential porches may be approved administratively if the porch is publicly visible the porch roof is not higher than 12 feet.

6.3.16 Retaining Walls
Retaining walls may be approved if:

1. They are less than 5 feet tall. Exception: Existing, permitted walls may be rebuilt to the same height and length using original materials or replaced with cut sandstone or stucco.

2. They are similar in height, length, and materials to other retaining walls visible in the neighborhood.

3. In the Hillside Design District, walls are screened with vegetation or finished in neutral colors.

4. Retaining walls must meet the development standards for retaining walls in SBMC

30.140.110 (Fences and Hedges).

5. Any grading or landscape alteration associated with retaining wall construction complies with the administrative approval standards for hardscape and landscape alterations in subsection 6.3.10.

6.3.17 Roofs and Reroofs
Administrative approval requires:

1. Reroofs or replacement of two-piece clay Mission-style tile with another material are not eligible. S-tile is only eligible if replacing existing permitted S-tile.

2. No shiny or reflective roofing materials.

3. Roof materials and colors are compatible with the architectural style of the structure.

Neutral colors and earth tones are generally acceptable. (See the Santa Barbara Colors Guide)

4. Vegetated roofing is prohibited in High Fire Hazard Areas.

Roofing Materials Guidance. Roof materials generally eligible for administrative approval are listed in the table below by architectural style. Note: the table below is not an exhaustive list; roofing materials not listed below may be considered for administrative approval on a case-by-case basis. Additional guidance on appropriate roof materials can be found in A Field Guide To American Houses.

Architectural Style of Main House and Roofing Materials Any Style
• Match Existing Material
Contemporary (Ranch, Midcentury, American Vernacular, tract homes) • Composition Shingle, Standing Seam Metal
Craftsman
• Composition Shingle
Mission
• Clay Two-Piece Terra Cotta Mission Tile
Spanish Revival
• Clay Two-Piece Terra Cotta Mission Tile

6.3.18 Screening and Screening Waivers
Screening elements (fences, hedges, walls, landscape planting) may be approved administratively if the following criteria are met:

1. They are no higher than needed to fully screen the item.

2. Screening may be waived if the item is not publicly visible or is already screened by existing features or topography.

3. Refer to fence standards in Section 6.3.9 for allowed materials.

6.3.19 Skylights
Administrative approval requires:

1. Skylights are flat and of non-reflective.

2. They are screened by the building, landscape, or a parapet.

6.3.20 Tree Removal
Tree removal or replacement may be approved if the following criteria are met:

1. The change meets the original planting purpose (Section 6.4).

2. The tree removal or replacement does not change a condition of approval.

3. No more than three trees are removed or replaced.

4. No historic tree or specimen tree is removed. (Historic and specimen trees are specially designated and are reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Department.).

5. No setback tree is removed without required approvals at Street Tree Advisory Committee and Parks & Recreation Commission.

6. No skyline or mature native tree (such as a Coast Live Oak/Quercus agrifolia) is removed.

7. Replacement is not within 50 feet of the top of creek bank.

8. A vegetation removal permit is not triggered (SBMC Chapter 22.10).

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 66 ends

9. If tree removal does not include replacement trees, it may still be approved if it meets any of the following criteria:
a. Enough trees remain to maintain the original planting purpose; or b. Nearby trees on City property maintain area tree density; or c. A qualified arborist finds the tree harms existing structures; or d. A qualified arborist finds the tree harms other trees; or e. A qualified arborist finds the tree cannot survive or thrive in place.

6.3.21 Tree Removal, Emergency/Hazardous
Removal of a tree that presents an apparent hazard to life or property may be approved if a certified arborist verifies the hazard in writing and one of the following applies:

1. The trunk is less than 4 inches in diameter at 4 feet 6 inches above grade; or

2. The tree is diseased and threatens surrounding trees; or

3. The tree is weakened and poses immediate danger; or

4. The tree is dead; or

5. The Fire Department orders removal for defensible-space requirements.

6.3.22 Trellises, Pergolas, Patio Covers, and Sunshades Administrative approval requires:

1. The following materials are not eligible: chain link, chicken wire, shiny/reflective material, corrugated metal, plastic, vinyl, wire mesh, and unfaced cement block

2. The structure is less than 250 square feet and under 12 feet in height. Exception: If not publicly visible, it may be up to 500 square feet.

3. Materials are smooth cedar, redwood, high-quality pressure-treated pine, or comparable, left natural or stained/sealed in wood-tone or neutral colors. Non-wood materials must be high quality (e.g., composite). Painted structures must match the house siding or trim.

6.3.23 Windows
Administrative approval requires:

1. Vinyl replacement of original wood windows is not eligible when publicly visible.

2. Projects proposing to remove a publicly visible Special Design Window (Section 6.4) are not eligible for administrative approval

3. Proposed windows are compatible in type, color, size, and scale with the architectural style.

4. Windows in additions visually match the main house.

5. Window placement, size, and scale generally meet Good Neighbor privacy guidelines.

6. Where nearby windows are divided-light, new windows match that pattern.

7. Divided-light windows use external grids; faux or internal grids are not allowed.

6.4Definitions
Any terms used in these Guidelines that are not specifically defined below shall be as defined in the Municipal Code.

6.4.1 Original Planting Purpose
The intended function of a tree or plant shown on an approved landscape plan. The purpose may be explicitly identified or implied by the design. Examples include providing privacy, preserving solar access, creating shade, framing a building, maintaining architectural style consistency, adding visual interest, supporting historic character, preventing erosion, or using appropriate species near sensitive biological areas.

6.4.2 Publicly Visible
The condition when a building, structure, or land use is within the area between a front lot line and up to 35 feet behind any front lot line and is either (1) observable by the public along any abutting public area or (2) is observable by the public from a public area on the other side of an abutting street or right-of-way.

6.4.3 Ridgeline
The line of highest elevation along a hill or mountain crest, identifiable in the City’s topographic GIS data as the narrow summit between descending slopes on both sides.

6.4.4 Skyline Tree
A tree that is at least 50 feet tall that is publicly visible from multiple viewing locations and contributes to the character of a streetscape or neighborhood. Skyline trees are generally taller and more noticeable than adjacent trees and structures

6.4.5 Special Design Window
A window that uses quality materials such as wood or steel and is constructed using a unique or artistic design style is considered a Special Design Window. Such windows are an important component of a building’s character and may be an enhancement to the entire neighborhood. Such windows include, but are not limited to, leaded glass windows, stained glass windows, multi-pane wood windows with elaborate muntin patterns, or non-rectangular accent windows.

6.5.6 Substantially Similar Tree or Landscaping Replacement Replacement trees or plantings are considered “substantially similar” and eligible for administrative design review when they meet either of the following sets of criteria:

EXHIBIT
Single Family Design Board Guidelines

Page 68 ends

a. Same Species Replacement

1. The replacement is the same species as the tree or plant being removed; and

2. The replacement tree has a trunk diameter equal to or greater than one-quarter of the diameter of the tree being removed; and

3. The replacement meets or exceeds the planting size shown on the approved landscape plan, with a minimum 5-gallon container for trees.

OR
b. Different Species Replacement

1. The tree being removed is less than 12 inches in diameter (measured 4 feet 6 inches above grade) and less than 20 feet tall; and

2. The cumulative area of changes to conditionally approved plantings is less than 1,000 square feet in the front yard and less than 20% of the total landscaped area; and

3. Removal does not require a vegetation removal permit under SBMC Chapter 22.10; and

4. The replacement species continues to fulfill the original planting purpose, such as privacy, solar access, shade, screening, erosion control, or habitat compatibility.

EXHIBIT

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
DATE: April 14, 2026
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: City Administrator’s Office
SUBJECT: Annual Report on Community Oversight of Law Enforcement and Work Plan Submitted on Behalf of the Fire and Police Commission RECOMMENDATION:

That Council receive the annual report on community oversight of law enforcement and work plan submitted on behalf of the Fire and Police Commission.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The Ordinance assigning new duties and authorities to the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners that was adopted by Mayor and Council on October 18, 2022 included the requirements that the police monitor role within the City Administrator’s Office will coordinate with the Commission to submit an annual report and work plan to the City Council no later than March 1 of each year [Section 2.09.040 B(9)]. It specified that the report may include information and input on items such as: the Commission’s activities during the year, evaluation of the workload and capacity of the Commission to address priority issues, and a summary of the number, type and disposition of complaints filed with Police Department and Fire Department by members of the public.

This report provides an update on the 2025 Work Plan and the activities of the Fire and Police Commission during the past year, and presents the 2026 Work Plan and key planning objectives adopted by the Commission for the coming year.

DISCUSSION:

Commission’s Activities
Over the course of the past year, the Fire and Police Commission continued to fulfill its oversight duties and deepen its engagement with the Santa Barbara community. The Commission received a number of required annual reports and informational presentations, including the Annual Report on Complaints and Investigations, the Use of Agenda Item No. 10
Council Agenda Report
Annual Report on Community Oversight of Law Enforcement and Work Plan Submitted on Behalf of the Fire and Police Commission
April 14, 2026

Page 2 ends

Force Annual Report, and the Racial Identity and Profiling Act (RIPA) Annual Report. The Commission also received a presentation on AB 481, which governs the use of military equipment funding, acquisition, and use by law enforcement agencies.

Beyond its required reporting functions, the Commission participated in several informational sessions designed to broaden its institutional knowledge. These included an overview of the Santa Barbara City Fire Department’s Fire Prevention Bureau, a briefing on the Santa Barbara Police Department’s Blue Envelope Program, periodic updates on the Regional Fire Communications Center, as well as a presentation on the new Genasys Evacuation Software. The Commission also reviewed and updated the Tow Rotation List and Tow Operating Policies as part of its ongoing quasi-judicial duties.

A recurring priority for the Commission has been strengthening its engagement with the broader community and creating accessible forums where community members can learn about the work of the Police and Fire Departments. The Commission remains focused on building trusted relationships with diverse community partners and creating open spaces for dialogue on critical public safety issues.

Role of Police Monitor
In addition to the role and responsibilities of the Fire and Police Commission within the civilian oversight system, the role of police monitor was assigned to the Senior Assistant to the City Administrator within the City Administrator’s Office. The police monitor is a civilian position designed to provide independent oversight to ensure efficient, just and lawful police operations. This includes monitoring use of force incidents, internal investigations, and complaints within the Police Department. This individual also serves as key advisor and staff liaison to the Fire and Police Commission.

For reference, the police monitor meets bi-weekly with the Commander for Community Accountability to review complaints received, status of investigations, and dispositions.

There is also specific monitoring and follow-up for complaints received through the City Administrator’s Office as well as monthly review of Use of Force incident data and investigations. Moreover, the City Administrator’s Office and the Police Department work closely together on data analysis, reporting, and informational presentations prepared for the Fire and Police Commission.

Summary of Complaints and Investigations
Per ordinance requirements, the Fire and Police Commission receives quarterly reports on complaints of police misconduct that include the number of complaints of Department sworn employees submitted to the Professional Standards Unit (PSU) as well as the number of pending PSU investigations, and the related policy section of misconduct that are being investigated.

Council Agenda Report
Annual Report on Community Oversight of Law Enforcement and Work Plan Submitted on Behalf of the Fire and Police Commission
April 14, 2026

Page 3 ends

The Fire and Police Commission received its third annual report on complaints and investigations on March 26, 2026. This report included the number of internal investigations completed by the PSU and the findings of those investigations along with the number of Department sworn employees disciplined and the level of discipline employed. It also noted the number of complaints that did not result in discipline.

Moreover, the Police Department provided the topic and total hours of training provided to Department sworn employees and the subject matter of those training sessions.

In 2025, the Santa Barbara Police Department responded to 56,439 calls for service, an increase of 5% from the prior year. The Department received eleven (11) community complaints which, in turn, equates to 99.99% of contacts with the public not resulting in a resident complaint. The Department also received one (1) administrative complaint.

Of the twelve (12) complaints, investigations resulted in the following dispositions: two were unfounded; two were exonerated; one was not sustained; three were sustained; and four remain open/active investigations. For background, the dispositions are defined as follows:
 Unfounded – The investigation clearly established that the allegation is not true.  Exonerated – The investigation clearly established that the employee’s actions that formed the basis of the allegations in the complaint were not in violation of law or agency policy.
 Not Sustained – The investigation failed to disclose sufficient evidence to clearly provide or disprove the complaint’s allegation.
 Sustained – The investigation disclosed sufficient evidence to provide truth of the allegation in complaint by a preponderance of evidence.

The sustained complaints led to two officers receiving corrective counseling and one officer being suspended. It is also important to note that in addition to the discipline imposed, officers often have additional training required because of a sustained violation. 2026 Work Plan and Key Planning Objectives
The 2026 Work Plan created and adopted by the Fire and Police Commission is included as an attachment to this report. The key planning objectives reflect the Commission’s continuing commitment to community engagement, transparency, and deepened understanding of the oversight functions within its authority. The objectives do not include the Commission’s regular quasi-judicial business items, such as the Tow Rotation List and Tow Operating Policies, which are addressed during public meetings throughout the year.

As the Fire and Police Commission works to complete the objectives in its Work Plan, it benefits from the support of City staff within the City Administrator’s Office and City Attorney’s Office as well as the leadership from the Santa Barbara Police Department and Fire Department.

Council Agenda Report
Annual Report on Community Oversight of Law Enforcement and Work Plan Submitted on Behalf of the Fire and Police Commission
April 14, 2026

Page 4 ends

BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

There are no objectives included in the 2026 Fire and Police Commission Work Plan that require additional financial resources to achieve at this time.

ATTACHMENT: Fire and Police Commission 2026 Work Plan

PREPARED AND
SUBMITTED BY: Barbara Andersen, Senior Assistant to the City Administrator APPROVED BY: Kelly R. McAdoo, City Administrator
Attachment

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

FIRE AND POLICE COMMISSION
2026 WORK PLAN

BACKGROUND
Per the Ordinance assigning new duties and authorities to the Fire and Police Commission, it states [2.09.040 B(9)] that the police monitor role within the City Administrator’s Office will coordinate with the Commission to submit an annual report and work-plan to the City Council no later than March 1 of each year.

PURPOSE
The purpose of the Fire and Police Commission is to act in an advisory capacity to the City Council and to the City Administrator in all matters relating to the efficient and adequate Fire and Police protection for the City of Santa Barbara.

The Commission is dedicated to strengthening the relationship between the community and the Santa Barbara Police Department and Fire Department by providing transparent oversight and increased civilian input regarding departmental policies, practices, and procedures.
2026 KEY PLANNING OBJECTIVES
The Fire and Police Commission is a chartered Commission and has long-standing, quasi-judicial duties relating to permitting and operating policies facilitated through the Santa Barbara Police Department. The following planning objectives do not include these regular business items along with annual budgetary review processes that are addressed during public meetings.

The Fire and Police Commission is proposing to accomplish the following planning objectives in the 2026 calendar year:
(1) Identify and implement ways in which the community can engage more in the work of the Fire and Police Commission. One of the responsibilities of the Fire and Police Commission is to provide a forum to facilitate communication between the community and the Fire and Police Departments, including opportunities for community input and education on departmental policies, procedures, and practices in Santa Barbara. Though the Commission meetings are held in publicly accessible venues and often recorded live, many community members do not feel comfortable participating for a variety of reasons. The Commission is committed to continuing its efforts to build these bridges with our Fire and Police Commission 2026 Work Plan

Page 2 ends

diverse community members by working with trusted, partner organizations to create safe, open spaces for dialogue on critical and timely issues. (2) Consider the appointment of a Commission Liaison for community meetings. To ensure consistent representation of the Fire and Police Commission at community stakeholder meetings and events, the Commission will consider the appointment of a Liaison that will be the primary spokesperson and representative for a defined period of time. Engagement opportunities may include neighborhood associations, community forums and town halls, youth and school meetings, business and merchant groups, public safety education workshops, communitypolice and community-fire relations, and community discussions regarding outside governmental influences affecting local law enforcement. The Commission may also provide direction regarding the scope of the Liaison role and reporting procedures consistent with open meeting laws.
(3) Support the Police Department’s commitment to transparency by receiving periodic reports summarizing Department interactions with federal immigration enforcement authorities. The Police Department shall provide periodic reports to the Fire and Police Commission, consistent with Department policy, summarizing Department interactions with federal immigration authorities, including general categories of activity and public safety responses. The Police Chief may also provide a post-incident briefing to the Commission after a critical incident involving federal immigration enforcement operations. (4) Continue to gain a better understanding of the investigatory process for complaints of police misconduct and use of force incidents. The members of the Fire and Police Commission have participated in trainings on the complaint process and use of force investigatory process. The Commission will continue to exercise its authority to review and discuss with the Police Chief individual investigations, if and when they become disclosable under the California Public Records Act pursuant to California Penal Code Section 832.7. The Commission will coordinate with the City Attorney’s Office and the Police Department to identify investigation(s) that meet these criteria and that would assist in understanding the processes in greater detail.

Santa Barbara City CouncilApril 14, 2026

Santa Barbara City Council
April 14, 2026