Agenda packet, first session — Santa Barbara City Council, April 21, 2026 (part 3 of 3)

BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

Funding for the implementation period and ongoing annual service costs will be budgeted through the Airport Department, subject to City Council appropriation. The Agreement provides that the implementation cost shall not exceed $125,000 and the annual service cost shall not exceed $86,500, unless amended and approved by the City.

Reimbursement for additional requested site visits is limited to actual travel costs consistent with City guidelines. Continued performance is subject to annual budget appropriations.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

While the primary purpose of this Agreement is operational and administrative, use of a cloud-based lease management system may modestly reduce paper files and duplicative manual recordkeeping.

A copy of the Agreement may be requested from the Airport Department for public review by emailing [email protected].

PREPARED BY: John Feldhans, Airport Properties Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Chris Hastert, Airport Director
APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
ORDINANCE NO. __________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA BARBARA APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE

AIRPORT DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE A SERVICE AND
SUPPORT AGREEMENT WITH PRODIGIQ, INC.,

COMMENCING UPON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE

ENABLING ORDINANCE

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. In accordance with the provision of Section 521 of the Charter of the City of Santa Barbara, An Ordinance of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara approving and authorizing execution of a 6-year agreement and two, 24-month options to renew with Prodigiq, Inc., for MYKONOS Lease Management System, GASB 87 Module, Tenant Portal, and Finance Module, is hereby approved.

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: April 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Parks and Recreation Department
SUBJECT: Introduction of Ordinance Approving First Amendment to Lease Agreement Number 25,583 with Mulligan’s Café Inc., at Santa Barbara Golf Club [Ordinance Introduction; Agreement]
RECOMMENDATION:

That Council introduce and subsequently adopt, by reading of title only, an Ordinance of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Approving a First Amendment to Lease Agreement No. 25,583 with Mulligan’s Café Inc., a California Corporation, for the Restaurant Facility at Santa Barbara Golf Club, 3500 McCaw Avenue, Extending the Term through September 30, 2029, and Updating Operational Provisions.

DISCUSSION:

In July 2016, the City Council adopted an ordinance approving a ten-year lease agreement with Mulligan’s Café and Bar (Mulligan’s) to provide food and beverage services at the Santa Barbara Golf Club (Golf Club). Mulligan’s has operated under a concession lease at the Golf Club for more than 30 years, developing a loyal and growing customer base while providing consistent financial returns to the City. The current lease term expires on June 30, 2026.

Mulligan’s is considered a tenant in good standing, with no outstanding notices of default and a strong record of timely rent payments.

The proposed Amendment would extend the Agreement term through September 30, 2029, remove golf privileges previously included in the lease, continue the annual cash contribution to the Golf Club marketing program, and refine beverage cart operating hours.

During the extension period, the City will conduct a comprehensive building assessment to evaluate current facility conditions, identify maintenance needs and necessary upgrades, and develop a clear, long-term reinvestment strategy for the facility.

Agenda Item No. 5
Council Agenda Report
Introduction of Ordinance Approving First Amendment to Lease Agreement Number 25,583 with Mulligan’s Café Inc., at Santa Barbara Golf Club [Ordinance Introduction; Agreement]
April 21, 2026

Page 2 ends

BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

The Fiscal Year 2027 Budget includes Concession Revenue at $242,550, in line with the financial terms of the proposed Amendment.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

The proposed lease amendment does not introduce operational changes that would directly impact sustainability. Extending the Agreement term enables the City to assess current building conditions, identify deferred maintenance and system upgrade needs, and evaluate opportunities to incorporate energy efficiency, water conservation, and other sustainability improvements into future reinvestment plans for the facility.

A copy of the Agreement may be requested from the Parks and Recreation Department for public review by emailing [email protected].

PREPARED BY: Tina Nelson, Business Manager
SUBMITTED BY: Jill Zachary, Parks and Recreation Director APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
ORDINANCE NO.____________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA BARBARA APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO
LEASE AGREEMENT NO. 25,583 WITH MULLIGAN’S CAFÉ
INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FOR THE

RESTAURANT FACILITY AT SANTA BARBARA GOLF
CLUB, 3500 MCCAW AVENUE, EXTENDING THE TERM
THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2029, AND UPDATING
OPERATIONAL PROVISIONS.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. In accordance with the provisions of Section 521 of the Charter of the City of Santa Barbara, an Ordinance of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Approving a First Amendment to Lease Agreement 25,583 With Mario and Elena Medina doing business as Mulligan’s Café Inc., commencing upon the effective date of the enabling Ordinance, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk, is hereby approved.

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: April 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Department of Water Resources
SUBJECT: Out-of-Agency Service Agreements for Sanitary Sewer System Connections [Resolution]
RECOMMENDATION:

That Council adopt, by reading of title only, a Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Restating the City’s Policy Regarding Connection to the Sanitary Sewer System of Property Located Outside of the City’s Jurisdictional Boundaries and Authorizing the Water Resources Director to Execute Agreements for Such Connections Pursuant to Santa Barbara Municipal Code Section 14.44.035.

DISCUSSION:

Staff recommend updates to the City of Santa Barbara’s (City) policy regarding connection to the sanitary sewer system for property located outside of the City’s jurisdictional boundaries. These updates intend to streamline the approval process, reducing the administrative burden for both staff and property owners as described below.

Background
The City occasionally receives requests for properties outside of the City to connect to the City sanitary sewer system, typically in response to health and safety needs related to failing septic systems.

California Government Code Section 56133 requires approval by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) before the City may provide new water or sewer service to property located outside of the City’s jurisdictional boundaries. Santa Barbara County LAFCO states that the annexation to a city is the preferred method for providing utility services, but LAFCO may approve out-of-agency service agreements when appropriate.

LAFCO is receptive to such agreements in the event of an emergency or health and safety related condition, or when annexation is infeasible given current boundaries, such as lack of contiguity to City limits.

Agenda Item No. 6
Council Agenda Report
Out-of-Agency Service Agreements for Sanitary Sewer System Connections [Resolution] April 21, 2026

Page 2 ends

Proposed Updates
Connection to the City sanitary sewer system outside of City boundaries is generally prohibited, except under certain circumstances as currently provided in City Resolution No. 94-143. Those restrictions include proximity to existing sewer facilities and execution of an agreement that is approved by the Public Works Director.

The proposed resolution continues the general prohibition of the provision of sewer service outside of City boundaries and would align the circumstances under which outside service could be provided under an agreement with the City to those that are contained in California Government Code Section 56133. The proposed resolution also delegates responsibilities to the Water Resources Director rather than the Public Works Director, consistent with the duties of the Department of Water Resources, which manages the City’s water resources and water and wastewater utilities.

The proposed resolution will help protect public health by streamlining the out-of-agency service agreement process.

BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

This resolution does not have material financial or budget implications for the City’s Water Fund.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

Adopting a resolution delegating authority for execution of agreements under California Government Code Section 56133 for connection to the City’s Sanitary Sewer System does not have any direct or indirect physical changes in the environment; therefore, subsequent agreements falls outside the definition of a “Project” under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(5), as administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct physical changes in the environment are not subject to CEQA environmental review.

WATER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:

This item was presented to the Water Commission at its meeting on March 19, 2026.

The Commission voted 5-0-0 in approval of staff’s recommendation.

PREPARED BY: Dakota Corey, Water Supply and Services Manager/KM/sjc SUBMITTED BY: Joshua Haggmark, P.E., Water Resources Director APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
RESOLUTION NO. _______________

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA BARBARA RESTATING THE CITY’S POLICY

REGARDING CONNECTION TO THE SANITARY SEWER

SYSTEM OF PROPERTY LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE
CITY’S JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES AND

AUTHORIZING THE WATER RESOURCES DIRECTOR TO

EXECUTE AGREEMENTS FOR SUCH CONNECTIONS

PURSUANT TO SANTA BARBARA MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTION 14.44.035
Whereas, Section 14.44.035 of the Santa Barbara Municipal Code establishes a requirement for a written agreement as a condition for approval of a connection of property located outside of the City’s jurisdictional boundaries.

Whereas, Resolution No. 94-143, adopted November 22, 1994, establishes the City’s policy regarding connection to the City’s sanitary sewer system of property located outside of the City’s jurisdictional boundaries.

Whereas, Resolution No. 94-143 delegates certain responsibilities to the Public Works Director that, following the creation of the Water Resources Director, should be delegated to the Water Resources Director.

Whereas, California Government Code Section 56133 establishes restrictions and requirements for agreements by which a City may provide new or extended services by contract or agreement outside a City’s jurisdictional boundaries, including a requirement for approval by the Local Agency Formation Commission.

Whereas, the City desires to restate, with amendments, its policy regarding connection to the City’s sanitary sewer system of property located outside of the City’s jurisdictional boundaries.

Therefore, be it resolved by the Council of the City of Santa Barbara that:

1. Connections to the City’s sanitary sewer system for the benefit of a parcel located outside of the City’s jurisdictional boundaries are prohibited except, A. Connections existing or authorized as of the effective date of this Resolution pursuant to a written agreement executed and recorded in compliance with Santa Barbara Municipal Code Section 14.44.035.

B. New connections under any of the following circumstances:
i. To provide new or extended services to a parcel within the City’s sphere of influence in connection with proceedings for annexation of the parcel to the City.
ii. To provide new services to any existing dwelling structure on a parcel within or outside of the City’s sphere of influence to respond to a documented existing or imminent threat to health or safety of the public or to the residents of the parcel to be served.
iii. When required to satisfy a continuing City sewer service commitment under an agreement or other legal obligation existing as of November 22, 1994 (the date of adoption of Resolution No. 94-143).

2. Service when authorized by Section 1 Subsection B of this Resolution may be provided only pursuant to a written agreement that complies with Santa Barbara Municipal Code Section 14.44.035 and has been approved by the Santa Barbara County LAFCO in accordance with Government Code Section 56133. The agreement must contain a provision stating that all of the laws applicable to use of the City’s sanitary sewer system within the City’s jurisdiction apply also to the owners and occupants of the parcel served under the agreement.

3. The Water Resources Director is authorized to execute on behalf of the City agreements required by this Resolution upon a determination by the Director that all of the conditions for provision of service have been satisfied.

4. The Water Resources Director is authorized to file on behalf of the City any request, application, or other document required by the Santa Barbara County LAFCO or its executive director under Government Code Section 56133 with respect to a new connection subject to this Resolution.

5. As used in this Resolution, the term “parcel” means (i) a legal lot created before January 1, 1983, or (ii) a group of contiguous lots held in common ownership before January 1, 1983.

6. Resolution No. 94-143 is rescinded.

RESOLUTION NO ^4-143

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA BARBARA ESTABLISHING AN AMENDED POLICY

OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA RELATIVE TO

CONNECTIONS TO THE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM OFPROPERTIES SITUATED OUTSIDE OF THE CORPORATELIMITS OF THE CITY WHEREAS, on July 9, 1985, the City Council adopted
Resolution 85-096 which contained a sewer connection policy; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend said policy.NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA THAT:

1. Except as provided herein, no connections to the
sanitary sewer system of the City for the benefit of a parcelsituated outside the corporate limits of the City will be permitted.

2. Pursuant to a written agreement as provided in Santa Barbara Municipal Code Section 14. 44. 035, by which a property owner, among other provisions, waives any right of protest toannexation, the Public Works Director may grant an exception tothe policy stated in Paragraph 1 for any of the following situations:

A. For a parcel on which either (i) there is an
existing single-family dwelling or (ii) it is proposed to buildonly one (1) single-family dwelling, provided that both of the following conditions are met:

1. The parcel either (i) is contiguous to or
traversed by an existing City sewer main, or (ii) has access byeasement or other valid instrument to an existing City sewer main; and

2. The Public Works Director finds that a
connection should be granted for reasons of health and safety.

B. For a parcel within an area recommended for
annexation in the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan, provided that the Public Works Director finds that the health, safety or welfare of the City, or certain of its residents, requires that City sewer service be provided.

C. Where necessary to satisfy existing City sewer
service commitments in effect on the date of adoption of this resolution.

Page 1 of 2 ends

EXHIBIT
3 As^ueed_herein, "parcel" means (i) a legal lot provided the lot_was legally created prior to January 1, 1983, or (ii) a group of contiguous lots held in common ownership prior to January 1, 1983.

4. This Resolution rescinds Resolution No. 85-096
Adopted: November 22, 1994
[EsBFSEWCON. RES]

Page 2 of 2 ends

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
RESOLUTION NO. 94-143
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
}
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBAfiA }
I, SANDRA E. LIZARRAGA, City Clerk in and for the City of Santa Barbara, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94-143 was adopted by the City Council at the meeting held November 22, 1994, 9:00 A. M., by the followingvote on roll call:

YEAS: COUNCILMEMBERS:

HELENE G. BEAVER ELINOR G. A. IANGERHAROLD P. FAIRLY HARRIET MILLER

GILBERT GARCIA TOM ROBERTS

MAYOR HAL CONKLIN
NAYS: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Santa Barbara this 22nd day of November, 1994
^L^ fi^^i^
Chief^beputy City Clerk
I HEREBY APPROVE this Resolution this
,
of November, 1994
Mayoi?

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: April 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Public Works Department
SUBJECT: Allocation of the City’s Share of Transportation Development Act Funds [Resolution]
RECOMMENDATION:

That Council adopt, by reading of title only, a Resolution of the Council of the City of Santa Barbara Authorizing the Filing of a Claim with the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments for an Allocation of $97,645 in Transportation Development Act Funds for Fiscal Year 2027.

DISCUSSION:

The Transportation Development Act (TDA), enacted by the California Legislature in 1971, provides funding to be allocated to transit and non-transit-related purposes that comply with regional transportation plans. The TDA funds a wide variety of transportation programs, including planning and program activities, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, community transit services, public transportation, and bus and rail projects.

The funds available to the City of Santa Barbara (City) are based on a formula previously agreed to by the County of Santa Barbara (County), the cities within the County, and the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG). Each year, the City is required to adopt a resolution authorizing the Public Works Director to file a claim for the City’s share of area-wide TDA Funds. The claim that will be submitted to SBCAG for Fiscal Year 2027 includes $97,645 for pedestrian and bicycle facilities. City staff will recommend using these funds towards bicycle improvements, and/or matching monies for Measure A Program and Active Transportation Program grant-awarded projects.

BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

By submitting a claim for allocation of TDA funds, the Public Works Department will increase revenue and expenditure appropriations by $97,645 in the Fiscal Year 2027 TDA Fund budget for bicycle and pedestrian projects. Appropriation of the TDA allocation will be included in the Fiscal Year 2027 Recommended Budget.

Agenda Item No. 7
Council Agenda Report
Allocation of the City’s Share of Transportation Development Act Funds [Resolution] April 21, 2026

Page 2 ends

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

TDA funds go towards projects that improve safety and accessibility for active transportation users. Projects are consistent with the City’s sustainability goals by encouraging more people to walk and bike, reducing energy consumption, and air pollution.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The allocation of the City’s share of TDA funds for bicycle and pedestrian projects falls outside of the definition of a “Project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15378 (b)(5) as administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct physical changes in the environment is not subject to CEQA environmental review. Future projects occurring as a result of these funds may be subject to CEQA environmental review.

PREPARED BY: Ashleigh A. Sizoo, P.E., City Engineer/JWG/nv SUBMITTED BY: Brian D’Amour, P.E., Public Works Director APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
RESOLUTION NO. _____

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA BARBARA AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A CLAIM

WITH THE SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF
GOVERNMENTS FOR AN ALLOCATION OF $97,645 IN

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2027
WHEREAS, the Transportation Development Act (TDA), as amended (Public Utilities Code Section 99200 et. seq.), provides for the allocation of funds from the Local Transportation Fund for use by eligible claimants for various transportation purposes; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the TDA, as amended, and pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations thereunder (21 Ca. Admin, Code Sections 6600 et. seq.), a prospective claimant wishing to receive an allocation from the Local Transportation Fund shall file its claim with the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA BARBARA AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City of Santa Barbara’s Public Works Director is authorized to execute and file an appropriate claim pursuant to the terms of the TDA, as amended, and pursuant to the applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, together with all the necessary supporting documents with SBCAG, for an allocation of TDA funds in Fiscal Year 2027.

SECTION 2. The authorized claim includes $97,645 for pedestrian and bicycle facilities.

SECTION 3. A copy of this Resolution shall be transmitted to SBCAG in conjunction with the filing of this claim.

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: April 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Sustainability & Resilience Department
SUBJECT: Agreement with Nimble Energy, Inc. for Energy Management Software Services [Agreement]
RECOMMENDATION:

That Council authorize the Sustainability and Resilience Director to execute a three-year Professional Services Agreement with Nimble Energy, Inc. for energy management software services in the amount of $126,594.

DISCUSSION:

The City of Santa Barbara operates hundreds of facilities and infrastructure assets that consume electricity and natural gas. Collectively, energy data for municipal facilities flow through several hundred service accounts across multiple providers and utilities.

Electricity is procured by Santa Barbara Clean Energy (SBCE) and delivered and billed by Southern California Edison (SCE). Natural gas is procured, delivered, and billed by Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). The City also has over a dozen facilities with distributed renewable energy generation and/or battery energy storage, where various third-party providers monitor and bill for on-site electricity generation and storage.

Analyzing energy performance at City facilities using conventional tools such as Microsoft Excel is laborious and time-intensive, often involving downloads from multiple platforms, extensive data manipulation, and manual data transfer. As a result, City staff are sometimes limited in their capacity to immediately identify operational issues in need of attention, utility billing errors, and energy opportunities across the City’s portfolio.

Energy management service providers automatically sync energy data from diverse sources into a single platform designed for flexibility, customization, and intuitiveness, facilitating the user’s ability to understand and analyze data efficiently within the platform or export it for external reporting. These systems also leverage data automation and artificial intelligence to scan large volumes of data for anomalies indicative of malfunctioning equipment or billing errors.

Agenda Item No. 8
Council Agenda Report
Agreement with Nimble Energy, Inc. for Energy Management Software Services [Agreement]
April 21, 2026

Page 2 ends

Implementation of the Nimble platform would offer the following benefits to the City:
 Bill Reconciliation. Energy management systems automatically scan for common billing errors, including incorrect meter readings, improper rate or tariff classifications, duplicate charges, and missing credits for on-site photovoltaic generation.
 Operational and Rate Structure Savings Opportunities. Southern California Edison and Santa Barbara Clean Energy utilize rate structures in which costs depend on total energy consumption, times of use, and peak demand, among other factors. Minor operational modifications and rate structure changes can unlock cost savings equivalent to significant percentages of total utility bills – particularly at larger facilities with operational flexibility and/or on-site electricity generation or batteries. Identifying these opportunities at scale requires automated data analysis best provided by specialized energy management software.  Maintenance Support. Anomalies in energy data may indicate malfunctioning photovoltaic systems, battery storage systems, HVAC equipment, and other assets. Early detection by an energy management platform and rapid response by staff can prevent costly energy bills, damage to expensive and sensitive equipment, and lost productivity from equipment failures.  Data-driven Infrastructure Investment Decisions. The City Council adopted the aspirational climate goal of carbon neutrality by 2035. In its Climate Action Plan, the City commits to lead by example with continued investments in municipal distributed renewable electricity generation, battery energy storage, and conversion of natural gas appliances and building infrastructure to carbon-free electric alternatives. Energy management platforms can evaluate prospective projects for expected cost savings, energy savings, and emissions reductions, helping drive decision-making and leverage limited investment dollars for maximum benefit.
 Public Engagement. The secure client-facing platform interfaces with a public dashboard, offering transparency into the City’s progress towards climate action goals and facilitating stakeholder engagement.

City staff received proposals from four leading energy management service providers.

Following initial presentations, product demonstrations, and preliminary bids, staff shortlisted three providers whose platforms best aligned with the City’s needs. A refined scope of work was issued to these providers, and revised proposals were received.

Nimble Energy submitted the lowest-cost proposal and, in staff’s assessment, offers the highest overall value based on product quality, customer service, and ease of implementation.

Council Agenda Report
Agreement with Nimble Energy, Inc. for Energy Management Software Services [Agreement]
April 21, 2026

Page 3 ends

BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

The Agreement between the City of Santa Barbara and Nimble Energy includes a threeyear term for a total amount of $126,593.75. First year costs, including one-time setup and annual subscription fees will total $47,781.25. Annual subscription fees in years two and three will total $39,406.25 per year.

There are sufficient expenditure appropriations in the FY26 Clean Energy Fund budget to fund the first year cost of the Agreement. Appropriations to cover costs of this contract in future years will be included in staff’s recommended budget each year.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Building energy use accounts for approximately 40% of community-wide emissions in Santa Barbara. This investment in energy management services will provide key insights into how the City can best lead the building decarbonization effort by example. As detailed in the discussion section above, this engagement will particularly support the City’s Climate Action Plan commitments to:
 Decarbonize 50% of municipal buildings and facilities by 2030 and all remaining municipal facilities by 2035 (Measure BE-1).
 Increase municipally owned distributed renewable energy generation throughout the City. (Measure BE-3).
 Facilitate Climate Action Planning Updates and supportive programming (Measure A-1).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This Agreement is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act because it does not constitute a project that may result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

A copy of the contract may be requested from the Sustainability & Resilience Department for public review by contacting [email protected].

PREPARED BY: Rachel Pelc, Energy Projects Coordinator
SUBMITTED BY: Alelia Parenteau, Sustainability & Resilience Director APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: April 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Department of Water Resources
SUBJECT: Request by Montecito Sanitary District for a Wastewater Treatment Services Agreement [Agreement]
RECOMMENDATION: That Council:

A. Direct Staff to evaluate the feasibility of and negotiate an Agreement for Provision of Wastewater Treatment Services to the Montecito Sanitary District; and B. Direct Staff to collect a $100,000 fee from the Montecito Sanitary District to offset City of Santa Barbara staff time and resources, which would be refunded to the District if an agreement is successfully negotiated.

DISCUSSION:

On March 4, 2026, the City of Santa Barbara (City) received a letter from the Montecito Sanitary District (MSD) requesting to discuss the potential conveyance and treatment of wastewater collected in the MSD service area. MSD is considering a major capital upgrade of its wastewater treatment facility to achieve regulatory compliance. MSD is also evaluating alternatives to wastewater treatment in their service area including the possibility of contracting with the City for the treatment of 0.6 million Gallons per Day (MGD) of wastewater (dry weather flow) at the City’s Wastewater Treatment Plant, El Estero Water Resource Center (EEWRC).

EEWRC is located at 520 East Yanonali Street and was designed to treat 11 MGD of domestic wastewater (dry weather flow). While EEWRC’s average daily flows have decreased to approximately 6 MGD in the last decade, the concentration of solids in the wastewater has remained equivalent to when flows were 8 MGD. Staff believe EEWRC has sufficient remaining capacity for the additional flows requested by MSD; however, this must be studied along with the reserved capacity to serve projected demands of new housing and other uses outlined by the City’s General Plan, which includes the Housing Element. Staff will also evaluate the impacts of wet weather Infiltration and Inflow (I&I), which can significantly impact treatment capacity. The City has been studying I&I impacts from the City’s existing service area and continues to invest in system improvements to reduce I&I in the collection system. Staff must also work with MSD to understand and mitigate the impacts of MSD’s wet weather I&I on EEWRC.

Agenda Item No. 9
Council Agenda Report
Request by Montecito Sanitary District for a Wastewater Treatment Services Agreement [Agreement]
April 21, 2026

Page 2 ends

If treatment of MSD wastewater at EEWRC is determined to be feasible, staff will submit a term sheet and request direction from Water Commission and City Council prior to drafting a formal agreement with MSD.

BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

Based on the history of negotiating agreements with outside agencies, staff recommend collecting a $100,000 fee from MSD for staff time and resources used to evaluate the feasibility of and negotiate an agreement. The fee would be refunded to MSD upon reaching an agreement. If MSD chooses not to pursue an agreement with the City, then the City would be entitled to keep the fee to offset City staff time and resources that were expended. Should contracted legal or technical services be needed to support negotiations or development of an agreement, those costs, and any cost sharing, would be determined under a separate agreement.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

Entering into an agreement with MSD would regionalize the City’s wastewater treatment, which typically offers economies of scale and results in energy, chemical, and cost savings. However, every wastewater system is unique, and local conditions need to be investigated to evaluate the success of regionalization. EEWRC produces over 50 percent of its power on-site through co-generation of biogas created at the treatment plant and is part of Santa Barbara Clean Energy to source the remaining power from renewable sources. Additional wastewater from MSD could result in increased gas production for cogeneration to offset a portion of the increased treatment energy needs. EEWRC also produces over one MGD of recycled water on average and has capacity to expand production if an agreement is met with MSD.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

A request to evaluate the feasibility of and negotiate an agreement for the provision of wastewater treatment services with MSD for regionalized wastewater treatment falls outside of the definition of a “Project” under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15378 (b)(5) as administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct physical changes in the environment and are not subject to CEQA environmental review. The authorization to negotiate an agreement will not result in direct physical impacts to the environment. If MSD and the City reach agreement, the agreement will be subject to CEQA environmental review.

ATTACHMENT: Montecito Sanitary District Letter – March 4, 2026 PREPARED BY: Thomas Welche, Wastewater System Manager/sjc SUBMITTED BY: Joshua Haggmark, P.E., Water Resources Director APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator

ATTACHMENT

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: April 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Parks and Recreation Department
Public Works Department
SUBJECT: Fifth Contract Amendment with RRM Design Group for Final Design and Construction Documents for the Dwight Murphy Field Renewal Project [Agreement]
RECOMMENDATION:

That Council authorize the Public Works Director to execute a fifth contract amendment with RRM Design Group in the amount of $86,240 for additional construction administration support, testing, land surveying, and inspections during construction of the Dwight Murphy Field Renewal Project for a new not-to-exceed dollar amount of $1,425,681 for all services.

DISCUSSION:

Project Description
The Project includes a full-scale renovation of the 9-acre park first established in 1925 as the Municipal Soccer Field. Project elements include: a multi-sport turf field; natural informal activity area; all-abilities inclusive playground; expanded fitness area; family picnic area; trash enclosure; restroom; and the restoration of a portion of Sycamore Creek. Other amenities include trees, landscaping, accessible pathways, fencing, lighting, right-of-way and park access improvements for vehicular circulation, a bus loading zone, and the increase of onsite and perimeter parking from 196 to 242 spaces.

Project Design and Construction
On May 6, 2025, City Council awarded Ohno Construction a construction contract for the Dwight Murphy Field Renewal Project (Project) in the amount of $26,773,425. The contractor broke ground on June 5, 2025. The City previously contracted with RRM Design Group (RRM) in 2021 to prepare final design and construction documents, including specifications and estimates, for the Project. Since that time, the contract with RRM has been amended to address additional design, bidding, construction Agenda Item No. 10
Council Agenda Report
Fifth Contract Amendment with RRM Design Group for Final Design and Construction Documents for the Dwight Murphy Field Renewal Project [Agreement] April 21, 2026

Page 2 ends

administration and testing services in support of project construction. During construction, different soils conditions were discovered requiring additional testing, land surveying, and construction administration. Additionally, the City requested RRM Design Group revise the Project design plans to address safety and project funding, including access to the playground and addition of an entry arch to recognize Mr. Ty Warner’s $5 Million gift in support of the Project.

Contract Amendment
On December 14, 2021, Council authorized the Public Works Director to execute a professional services agreement with RRM in the amount of $838,191 to prepare final design and construction documents, including specifications and estimates, for the Project. On April 18, 2023, Council approved the first contract amendment for $83,590 for supplemental field investigation work. On December 10, 2024, Council approved the second contract amendment for $18,700 to provide additional bid support for the project.

On May 6, 2025, Council approved the third contract amendment for $311,960 to provide construction administration support. On October 7, 2025, Council approved fourth contract amendment for $87,000 to provide soils testing and playground safety audits during construction. The purpose of the fifth contract amendment is to provide additional soils testing, land surveying, and construction administration for a new not-to-exceed dollar amount of $1,425,681.

BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

Funding for the contract amendment is appropriated in the Fiscal Year 2025 Measure C Capital Outlay Fund. The following outlines the total project cost, including the additional expenditure in this report:
*Cents have been rounded to the nearest dollar in this table.

Construction Contract (Ohno Construction) $26,773,425
Construction Change Order Allowance 2,677,342
Subtotal $29,450,767
City Procured Materials (turf, modular restroom, etc.) 1,126,346 Other Construction Costs (permits, etc.) 104,365
CWA Administration (by TSG Enterprises) 47,696
Construction Management/Inspection (by City Staff) 778,727 Construction Administration (by RRM) 485,200
Subtotal $2,542,334
Total Project Construction Cost to Completion $31,993,101 Project funding for construction includes $6 million from The Gwendolyn Strong Foundation, a $1.5 million Federal Government Community Priority Funding grant, $6 million in previously appropriated Measure C funds, the recent debt issuance of $13 million approved by the City Council, and a $5 million pledge from Ty Warner. Total Council Agenda Report
Fifth Contract Amendment with RRM Design Group for Final Design and Construction Documents for the Dwight Murphy Field Renewal Project [Agreement] April 21, 2026

Page 3 ends

Project construction costs exceed the existing appropriations currently available ($26.5M). Staff is considering possible additional financing, donations, and future Measure C appropriations to close the approximately $400,000 budget gap.

SUSTAINABILITY IMPACT:

The Project will further the City’s sustainability goals through incorporating environmentally responsible design and construction techniques including, the specification of recycled content building materials, construction debris recycling, addition of electric vehicle chargers, and the use of native and drought tolerant landscaping.

A copy of the contract amendment may be requested from the Public Works Department for public review. Please contact [email protected] to request a copy.

PREPARED BY: Justin Van Mullem, Capital Projects Supervisor Jill Zachary, Parks and Recreation Director
SUBMITTED BY: Brian D’Amour, Public Works Director
APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: April 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Fire Department
SUBJECT: Approval of Standard Equipment for Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) for the Fire Department
RECOMMENDATION:

That Council waive formal bidding requirements and approve 3M/SCOTT SCBAs as Standard Equipment for the Fire Department for the next fifteen years, in accordance with Section 4.52.070 (L) of the Municipal Code.

DISCUSSION:

The Fire Department’s current SCBA equipment has reached the end of its service life.

Measure C funds in the amount of $1,500,000 have been appropriated for replacement.

The Department has identified 3M/SCOTT as its preferred brand and is requesting a best interest waiver. A formal competitive bid process will be conducted to ensure the City receives the best overall value as multiple vendors sell the brand 3M/SCOTT. 3M/SCOTT is the current SCBA system in use by the City of Santa Barbara. Existing air bottles are compatible with current packs and filling stations, and personnel are already trained and familiar with the equipment. The Fire Department’s Personal Protective Equipment Committee evaluated multiple manufacturers including those used by neighboring agencies.

Based on this evaluation, 3M/SCOTT was determined to be the most advantageous option due to its ease of use, compatibility with existing equipment (including packs, bottles, and compressors), and enhanced safety features. The SCOTT system also offers mask enhancements that improve firefighter safety and integrate seamlessly with current equipment. The City’s policies and procedures allow for an “or equal” on competitive awards. Standardized items that are not a Sole Source will be competitively awarded in accordance with the City’s policies and procedures based on value, but without allowing for an “or equal” alternative.

Agenda Item No. 11
Council Agenda Report
Approval of Standard Equipment for Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) for the Fire Department
April 21, 2026

Page 2 ends

Section 4.52.070 (L) of the Municipal Code authorizes Council to purchase equipment, supplies, and general services without complying with Formal Bidding Procedures when, in the opinion of the Council, compliance with the procedure is not in the best interest of the City.

BUDGET/FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

There are no financial impacts for the approval of the Best Interest Waiver. Adequate expenditure appropriation exists in the Fire Department budget for the purchase of SCBAs.

PREPARED BY: Rich Ames, Battalion Chief
SUBMITTED BY: Chris Mailes, Fire Chief
APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
AGENDA DATE: April 21, 2026
TO: Mayor and Councilmembers
FROM: Finance Department
SUBJECT: Fiscal Year 2026 Interim Financial Statements for the Eight Months Ended February 28, 2026
RECOMMENDATION:

That Council accept the Fiscal Year 2026 Interim Financial Statements for the eight months ended February 28, 2026.

DISCUSSION:

The interim financial statements for the eight months ended February 28, 2026 (67% of the fiscal year) are attached. The interim financial statements include budgetary activity in comparison to actual activity for the General Fund, Enterprise Funds, Internal Service Funds, and select Special Revenue Funds.

ATTACHMENT: Interim Financial Statements for the Eight Months Ended February 28, 2026
PREPARED BY: Nathalie Lecolley, Controller
SUBMITTED BY: Keith DeMartini, Finance Director
APPROVED BY: Kelly McAdoo, City Administrator
Agenda Item No. 12
ATTACHMENT 1
Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with %of Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD
GENERAL FUND (pages 3-7)
Revenue 208,664,394 209,509,702 128,276,393 - 81,233,309 61.2% 135,389,253 Expenditures 210,270,440 218,911,999 136,456,105 5,996,661 76,459,234 65.1% 149,191,071 Addition to / (use of) reserves (9,402,298) (1,606,046) (8,179,712) (5,996,661) 4,774,075 (13,801,818) MEASURE C (pages 3-7)
Included in GF summary
Revenue 34,235,000 34,257,500 22,154,807 - 12,102,693 64.7% 21,750,318 Expenditures 35,119,802 79,250,477 17,202,027 - 62,048,450 21.7% 26,212,226 Addition to / (use of) reserves (44,992,977) (884,802) 4,952,781 - (49,945,758) (4,461,908) SOLID WASTE FUND (page 9)
Revenue 42,990,702 43,199,169 28,421,627 - 14,777,542 65.8% 26,865,278 Expenditures 42,373,212 42,940,718 26,491,292 7,777,088 8,672,339 79.8% 23,897,395 Addition to / (use of) reserves 258,451 617,491 1,930,335 (7,777,088) 6,105,204 2,967,883 WATER OPERATING FUND (page 10)
Revenue 86,755,946 86,755,946 58,149,600 - 28,606,346 67.0% 55,845,319 Expenditures 89,330,512 92,373,085 53,057,627 9,994,327 29,321,131 68.3% 48,571,871 Addition to / (use of) reserves (5,617,139) (2,574,566) 5,091,973 (9,994,327) (714,786) 7,273,448 WASTEWATER OPERATING FUND (page 11)
Revenue 34,492,415 34,492,415 22,484,598 - 12,007,817 65.2% 21,608,658 Expenditures 37,164,550 38,506,072 22,447,155 2,549,103 13,509,814 64.9% 20,292,533 Addition to / (use of) reserves (4,013,657) (2,672,135) 37,443 (2,549,103) (1,501,997) 1,316,125 DOWNTOWN PARKING FUND (page 12)
Revenue 10,239,915 10,292,475 6,840,175 - 3,452,300 66.5% 7,400,623 Expenditures 10,292,863 10,498,546 6,502,209 311,861 3,684,476 64.9% 7,434,359 Addition to / (use of) reserves (206,071) (52,948) 337,966 (311,861) (232,175) (33,736) AIRPORT OPERATING FUND (page 13)
Revenue 35,563,735 41,639,385 22,428,302 - 19,211,083 53.9% 22,084,143 Expenditures 41,945,246 55,771,253 26,468,764 5,461,168 23,841,320 57.3% 23,839,968 Addition to / (use of) reserves (14,131,868) (6,381,511) (4,040,462) (5,461,168) (4,630,238) (1,755,825) GOLF COURSE FUND (page 14)
Revenue 5,267,832 5,267,832 3,217,785 - 2,050,047 61.1% 3,156,316 Expenditures 5,741,937 6,344,110 3,901,180 - 2,442,930 61.5% 2,496,494 Addition to / (use of) reserves (1,076,278) (474,105) (683,395) - (392,883) 659,821 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FUND (page 15)
Revenue 8,285,099 8,285,099 5,632,842 - 2,652,257 68.0% 4,621,319 Expenditures 7,844,685 8,024,773 4,804,246 407,650 2,812,878 64.9% 3,848,582 Addition to / (use of) reserves 260,325 440,414 828,596 (407,650) (160,621) 772,737

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
Summary by Fund
For Seven Months Ended February 28, 2026 (66.6% of Fiscal Year)

Page 1 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with %of Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
Summary by Fund
For Seven Months Ended February 28, 2026 (66.6% of Fiscal Year) FLEET REPLACEMENT FUND (page 16)
Revenue 7,517,447 7,550,586 5,366,783 - 2,183,803 71.1% 4,669,206 Expenditures 5,225,193 10,503,607 1,551,829 835,354 8,116,424 22.7% 1,872,397 Addition to / (use of) reserves (2,953,021) 2,292,254 3,814,954 (835,354) (5,932,620) 2,796,809 FLEET MAINTENANCE FUND (page 17)
Revenue 4,174,813 4,176,813 2,777,755 - 1,399,058 66.5% 2,336,584 Expenditures 4,023,444 4,039,468 2,576,037 262,849 1,200,582 70.3% 2,473,410 Addition to / (use of) reserves 137,344 151,369 201,718 (262,849) 198,476 (136,826) SELF INSURANCE TRUST FUND (page 18)
Revenue 25,414,322 25,514,322 17,142,196 - 8,372,126 67.2% 13,581,339 Expenditures 24,784,085 24,999,880 13,521,940 518,929 10,959,012 56.2% 11,283,237 Addition to / (use of) reserves 514,442 630,237 3,620,256 (518,929) (2,586,886) 2,298,102 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND (page 19)
Revenue 10,602,324 10,602,327 7,032,327 - 3,570,000 66.3% 6,316,700 Expenditures 9,936,222 10,073,494 6,892,328 174,126 3,007,040 70.1% 6,280,555 Addition to / (use of) reserves 528,833 666,102 139,999 (174,126) 562,960 36,144 WATERFRONT OPERATING FUND (page 20)
Revenue 20,788,855 20,788,855 13,809,910 - 6,978,945 66.4% 14,006,993 Expenditures 22,732,468 22,941,467 14,360,972 985,176 7,595,318 66.9% 13,358,535 Addition to / (use of) reserves (2,152,612) (1,943,613) (551,062) (985,176) (616,373) 648,457 SANTA BARBARA CLEAN ENERGY FUND (page 21)
Revenue 47,843,217 47,843,217 27,545,245 - 20,297,972 57.6% 28,230,521 Expenditures 50,573,418 52,623,178 28,294,678 5,119,699 19,208,801 63.5% 30,576,004 Addition to / (use of) reserves (4,779,960) (2,730,201) (749,433) (5,119,699) 1,089,172 (2,345,483) ENERGY AND CLIMATE MANAGEMENT FUND (page 22)
Revenue 2,288,786 2,288,786 1,514,976 - 773,810 66.2% 1,481,291 Expenditures 2,313,378 2,705,342 1,287,923 81,160 1,336,259 50.6% 1,243,404 Addition to / (use of) reserves (416,556) (24,592) 227,053 (81,160) (562,449) 237,887

TOTAL FOR ALL FUNDS
Revenue 550,889,802 558,206,928 350,640,513 - 207,566,415 62.8% 347,593,542 Expenditures 564,551,652 601,256,993 348,614,285 40,475,149 212,167,558 64.7% 346,659,816 Addition to / (use of) reserves (43,050,065) (13,661,850) 2,026,227 (40,475,149) (4,601,143) 933,726 ** It is City policy to adopt a balanced budget. In most cases, encumbrance balances exist at year-end. These encumbrance balances are obligations of each fund and must be reported at the beginning of each fiscal year. In addition, a corresponding appropriations entry must be made in order to accommodate the 'carried-over' encumbrance amount. Most differences between budgeted annual revenues and expenses are due to these encumbrance carryovers.

Page 2 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Balance with Percent Previous Change Over Budget Budget Actual Revised budget Received YTD Prior Year TAXES
Sales and Use 31,960,000 31,960,000 20,206,618 11,753,382 63.2% 20,802,745 -2.9% Measure C Sales Tax 34,235,000 34,257,500 22,154,807 12,102,693 64.7% 21,750,318 1.9% Measure I Sales Tax 15,100,000 15,100,000 8,021,813 7,078,187 53.1% - 0.0% Property Taxes 53,581,500 53,581,500 28,476,398 25,105,102 53.1% 27,207,266 0.0% Utility Users Tax 8,200,000 8,200,000 5,018,277 3,181,723 61.2% 5,616,997 -10.7% Transient Occupancy Tax 29,561,000 29,561,000 21,295,899 8,265,101 72.0% 20,725,180 2.8% Business License 2,958,000 2,958,000 2,234,100 723,900 75.5% 2,318,924 -3.7% Cannabis Excise Tax 1,000,000 1,000,000 690,527 309,473 69.1% 644,608 7.1% Real Property Transfer Tax 1,000,000 1,000,000 628,241 371,759 62.8% 509,616 23.3% Total Tax Revenues 177,618,000 177,595,500 108,726,681 68,891,319 61.2% 99,575,654 9.2%

LICENSES & PERMITS
Licenses & Permits 239,725 240,925 81,424 159,501 33.8% 101,028 -19.4% Total 240,925 239,725 81,424 159,501 33.8% 101,028 -19.4%

FINES & FORFEITURES
Police 2,900,252 2,900,252 2,169,052 731,200 74.8% 1,389,764 56.1% Other Fines & Forfeitures 505,400 505,400 313,213 192,187 62.0% 696,332 -55.0% Total 3,405,652 3,405,652 2,482,265 923,388 72.9% 2,086,096 19.0%

USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY
Investment Income 2,497,391 2,497,391 1,264,729 1,232,662 50.6% 996,562 26.9% Rents & Concessions 1,615,325 1,615,325 1,029,864 585,461 63.8% 852,192 20.8% Total 4,112,716 4,112,716 2,294,592 1,818,123 55.8% 1,848,754 24.1%

INTERGOVERNMENTAL
Library 919,983 919,983 37,402 882,582 4.1% 45,601 0.0% Fire 1,500,000 1,500,000 941,771 558,229 62.8% 1,103,866 0.0% Other Intergovernmental 497,078 497,078 583,164 (86,086) 117.3% 423,058 37.8% Total 2,917,061 2,917,061 1,562,336 1,354,724 53.6% 1,572,524 -0.6%

FEES & SERVICE CHARGES
Community Development 7,762,650 7,822,650 6,216,258 1,606,392 79.5% 5,316,765 16.9% Parks & Recreation 4,869,967 4,809,767 3,208,811 1,600,956 66.7% 2,901,650 10.6% Other Service Charges 3,262,558 3,782,479 1,970,345 1,812,134 52.1% 2,082,197 -5.4% Total 16,414,896 15,895,175 11,395,414 5,019,481 69.4% 10,300,613 10.6%

OTHER REVENUES
Interfund Charges & Reimbursement 17,339,859 17,339,859 10,541,503 6,798,356 60.8% 9,519,231 10.7% Overhead Indirect Allocations 12,953,367 12,921,424 8,587,490 4,333,934 66.5% 6,338,388 35.5% Interfund Transfers 637,407 893,737 634,960 258,777 71.0% 338,686 87.5% Interfund Loans 24,140 24,140 - 24,140 0.0% - 0.0%
Miscellaneous 1,201,292 1,301,292 233,586 1,067,706 18.0% 165,442 41.2% Donations 77,500 77,500 32,250 45,250 41.6% 32,877 -1.9% Franchise Fees 6,500,000 6,500,000 3,858,698 2,641,302 59.4% 3,509,960 9.9% Total 39,057,953 38,733,565 23,888,487 15,169,466 61.2% 19,904,584 20.0% Subtotal Non-Tax Revenues 66,149,202 65,303,894 41,704,519 24,444,683 63.0% 35,813,599 16.4% TOTAL REVENUES 243,767,202 242,899,394 150,431,200 93,336,002 61.7% 135,389,253 11.1%

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
General Fund
Interim Statement of Budgeted and Actual Revenues
For Seven Months Ended February 28, 2026 (66.6% of Fiscal Year)

Page 3 ends

YTD
Remaining Expended
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with and Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Encumbered YTD

GENERAL GOVERNMENT
Mayor & City Council
MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL 1,358,463 1,356,249 796,197 15,206 547,060 59.7% 795,884 ARTS & COMMUNITY PROMOTIONS 2,021,798 2,000,318 1,138,110 673,739 209,949 89.6% 1,643,514 Total 3,380,261 3,356,567 1,934,307 688,946 757,009 77.6% 2,439,398 City Attorney
CITY ATTORNEY-ADMINISTRATION 5,877,898 5,612,505 3,484,462 269,318 2,124,118 63.9% 833,670 CITY ATTORNEY-ADVISORY 16,000 - 27 16,000 (27) 100.2% 921,153 CITY ATTORNEY-CODE ENFORCEMENT - - (1,122) - 1,122 0.0% 604,092 Total 5,893,898 5,612,505 3,483,368 285,318 2,125,213 63.9% 3,237,291 Administration
CITY ADMINISTRATOR 3,452,710 3,268,068 2,227,224 325,684 899,803 73.9% 1,970,455 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 83 - 55.13 - 28 66.7% 4,346
CITY TV 701,500 620,913 349,559 15,003 336,938 52.0% 370,028 DOWNTOWN PROGRAM 1,976,837 1,870,507 1,180,309 507,321 289,207 85.4% - HUMAN SVCS. 1,414,826 461,532 516,429 924,138 (25,741) 101.8% - HOUSING MEDIATION 548,306 547,928 343,812 190 204,303 62.7% - COMMUNITY VITALITY 850,723 850,162 277,018 253 573,451 32.6% - CITY CLERK 1,000,982 974,650 642,342 24,503 334,138 66.6% 526,419 Total 9,945,966 8,593,758 5,536,748 1,797,091 2,612,126 73.7% 2,871,249 Human Resources
HUMAN RESOURCES 2,506,311 2,455,968 1,368,127 113,201 1,024,984 59.1% 1,533,729 EMPLOYEE RELATIONS 494,135 384,894 216,959 129,345 147,831 70.1% 187,847 EMPLOYEE DEVELOPMENT 98,068 94,447 26,645 6,193 65,230 33.5% 41,366 Total 3,098,514 2,935,310 1,611,731 248,739 1,238,045 60.0% 1,762,942 Finance
ADMINISTRATION 440,384 342,626 286,591 53,146 100,648 77.1% 260,961 REVENUE & CASH MANAGEMENT 1,243,646 949,533 552,112 198,779 492,755 60.4% 521,972 CASHIERING & COLLECTION 1,872,193 1,684,907 990,027 27,842 854,324 54.4% 841,885 BUDGET MANAGEMENT 1,284,428 1,067,783 762,533 7,000 514,895 59.9% 715,684 ACCOUNTING 1,247,640 1,245,821 782,572 26,862 438,207 64.9% 764,605 MISCELLANEOUS 520,917 519,768 335,503 - 185,413 64.4% 325,126 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 324,925 311,736 232,612 12,450 79,863 75.4% 235,376 CITY BILLING & CUSTOMER SERVICE 1,080,161 928,460 638,303 44,347 397,512 63.2% 488,667 PURCHASING 860,454 858,216 571,128 - 289,326 66.4% 503,030 CENTRAL WAREHOUSE 222,407 220,475 146,217 - 76,190 65.7% 136,429 MAIL SERVICES 190,819 185,000 116,065 11,933 62,822 67.1% 110,285 Total 9,287,975 8,314,325 5,413,663 382,359 3,491,953 62.4% 4,904,020 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 31,606,614 28,812,465 17,979,816 3,402,452 10,224,346 67.7% 15,214,900 General Fund
Interim Statement of Appropriations, Expenditures and Encumbrances For Seven Months Ended February 28, 2026 (66.6% of Fiscal Year)

Page 4 ends

YTD
Remaining Expended
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with and Previous
Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Encumbered YTD General Fund
Interim Statement of Appropriations, Expenditures and Encumbrances For Seven Months Ended February 28, 2026 (66.6% of Fiscal Year)

PUBLIC SAFETY
Police
CHIEF'S STAFF 2,741,936 2,711,702 2,546,793 83,441 111,702 95.9% 2,189,323 BUSINESS OFFICE 1,087,284 1,080,247 706,598 - 380,686 65.0% 635,382 RECORDS BUREAU 2,394,342 2,354,721 1,509,882 2,417 882,043 63.2% 1,379,843 STRATEGIC OPERATIONS 2,811,642 2,786,798 1,883,733 12,817 915,092 67.5% 1,727,809 PROPERTY ROOM 327,481 325,300 221,868 - 105,614 67.7% 172,645 TRAINING, RECRUITMENT/WELLNESS 3,981,067 3,898,322 2,058,911 63,546 1,858,610 53.3% 1,900,173 RANGE AND EQUIPMENT 2,169,291 2,103,076 1,339,056 73,378 756,857 65.1% 1,138,091 INF.TECHNOLOGY/CRIME ANALYSIS 2,131,461 2,074,900 1,640,709 71,676 419,077 80.3% 1,660,883 CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS & INTERNAL OP'S 7,133,433 7,046,070 4,779,396 19,955 2,334,083 67.3% 4,197,239 CRIME LAB 200,990 199,614 121,026 - 79,964 60.2% 116,908 FIELD OPERATIONS DIVISION 25,513,384 25,304,759 16,315,638 26,842 9,170,904 64.1% 15,272,225 TRAFFIC 1,415,159 1,406,459 1,111,521 - 303,637 78.5% 790,801 SPECIAL EVENTS 711,399 676,025 260,325 40,738 410,337 42.3% 254,054 STREET CRIMES UNIT 2,663,617 2,203,889 1,887,910 - 775,706 70.9% 1,525,740 SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT TEAM 108,194 108,194 - - 108,194 0.0% 37,427 PARKING AND STREET SWEEPING 409,637 406,848 219,918 - 189,719 53.7% 208,136 PARKING ENFORCEMENT 1,205,747 1,186,147 756,356 4,026 445,365 63.1% 614,404 COMBINED COMMUNICATIONS CTR. 4,301,134 4,277,707 2,540,961 - 1,760,173 59.1% 2,514,586 ANIMAL CONTROL 1,066,360 1,042,167 412,778 472,702 180,880 83.0% 465,901 Total 62,373,558 61,192,945 40,313,379 871,537 21,188,643 66.0% 36,801,572 Fire
ADMINISTRATION 1,626,701 1,620,294 1,508,755 - 117,945 92.7% 1,388,705 EMERGENCY SRVS / PUBLIC ED 544,545 543,168 331,758 - 212,786 60.9% 295,704 PREVENTION 1,623,253 1,516,456 969,491 - 653,762 59.7% 848,609 WILDLAND FIRE MITIGATION PROG. 435,245 397,918 227,872 - 207,374 52.4% 206,130 OPERATIONS 35,563,185 32,499,169 22,272,514 44,257 13,246,414 62.8% 20,153,858 TRAINING AND RECRUITMENT 1,850,530 1,713,641 649,022 4,543 1,196,965 35.3% 1,034,972 ARFF 4,420,055 4,090,031 2,975,854 - 1,444,201 67.3% 2,418,609 Total 46,063,514 42,380,676 28,935,266 48,800 17,079,448 62.9% 26,346,587 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 108,437,073 103,573,620 69,248,645 920,337 38,268,091 64.7% 63,148,159

PUBLIC WORKS
Public Works
ADMINISTRATION 1,927,270 1,956,797 1,100,682 23,353 832,761 57.4% 1,389,227 ENGINEERING SVCS 10,831,773 10,845,794 6,543,292 1,463 4,301,039 60.3% 6,019,541 PUBLIC RT OF WAY MGMT 2,428,203 2,448,302 1,357,938 16,040 1,074,325 56.1% 1,368,881 Total 15,250,893 15,187,246 9,001,912 40,856 6,208,125 59.3% 8,777,650 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 15,250,893 15,187,246 9,001,912 40,856 6,208,125 59.3% 8,777,650

Page 5 ends

COMMUNITY SERVICES
Parks & Recreation
REC PROGRAM MGMT 898,708 883,128 671,231 7,244 220,233 75.5% 718,125 FACILITIES & SPECIAL EVENTS 2,423,941 2,450,750 1,459,585 131,648 832,708 65.6% 1,429,380 YOUTH ACTIVITIES 1,864,121 1,802,962 1,051,123 38,586 774,412 58.5% 990,996 ACTIVE ADULTS 1,176,905 1,175,653 747,528 2,917 426,460 63.8% 644,197 AQUATICS 2,621,355 2,711,087 1,909,724 55,626 656,005 75.0% 1,678,890 SPORTS 1,585,416 1,593,010 969,700 110,405 505,311 68.1% 831,007 NEIGHBORHOOD/OUTREACH SERV 1,692,130 1,679,472 940,806 10,463 740,861 56.2% 833,190 ADMINISTRATION 1,744,093 1,740,812 1,130,699 1,186 612,208 64.9% 994,190 PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM 1,166,872 1,141,579 671,985 15,851 479,037 58.9% 517,653 PARK OPERATIONS MNGMNT 1,516,441 1,510,344 931,598 53,121 531,722 64.9% 907,196 GROUNDS & FACILITIES MAINT. 8,349,876 8,243,319 4,648,561 156,984 3,544,331 57.6% 4,367,424 FORESTRY 2,274,448 2,139,374 1,535,085 28,756 710,608 68.8% 1,247,901 BEACH MAINTENANCE 363,327 363,025 222,771 12,981 127,575 64.9% 150,447 MEDIANS PARKWAYS&CONTRACTS 613,585 612,913 274,906 180,179 158,500 74.2% 269,735 Total 28,291,217 28,047,427 17,165,301 805,946 10,319,971 63.5% 15,580,333 Library
ADMINISTRATION 1,080,355 998,300 653,049 - 345,251 65.4% 732,110 CENTRAL LIBRARY 7,659,841 7,755,010 4,627,197 116,124 3,011,688 61.2% 3,578,547 EASTSIDE LIBRARY 661,165 661,504 429,706 1,678 230,121 65.2% 363,373 LIBRARY ON THE GO 461,718 461,913 294,197 - 167,716 63.7% 239,776 ADULT EDUCATION - - 21,225 - (21,225) 0.0% 266,329
Total 9,876,726 9,863,079 6,025,375 117,802 3,733,550 62.2% 5,180,135 TOTAL COMMUNITY SERVICES 38,167,944 37,910,506 23,190,675 923,748 14,053,521 63.2% 20,760,468

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Community Development
ADMINISTRATION 1,169,403 1,165,113 1,095,329 29,137 44,937 96.2% 1,431,175 HUMAN SERVICES 149,733 - - - 149,733 0.0% 348,522
LONG RANGE PLAN & SPEC STUDY 1,594,817 1,540,735 765,880 30,737 798,200 50.0% 827,416 DEVEL & ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 2,981,378 2,089,169 1,420,196 66,585 1,494,597 49.9% 1,223,496 ZONING INFO & ENFORCEMENT 1,844,615 1,839,465 1,127,293 4,486 712,836 61.4% 1,017,319 DESIGN REV & HIST PRESERVATION 1,916,304 1,909,414 1,152,841 2,156 761,307 60.3% 1,068,499 BLDG INSP & CODE ENFORCEMENT 2,077,958 2,070,662 1,321,456 1,019 755,483 63.6% 1,051,070 RECORDS ARCHIVES & CLER SVCS 786,056 776,448 487,385 13,106 285,565 63.7% 456,600 BLDG COUNTER & PLAN REV SVCS 3,781,602 3,439,615 2,010,808 481,163 1,289,631 65.9% 1,836,345 CODE COMPLIANCE 1,143,763 1,138,778 720,656 2,730 420,376 63.2% 618,054 Total 17,445,629 15,969,397 10,101,845 631,120 6,712,665 61.5% 10,128,431 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 17,445,629 15,969,397 10,101,845 631,120 6,712,665 61.5% 10,128,431

Page 6 ends

SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE
Sustainability and Resilience
ABATEMENT 305,513 500,506 244,586 78,148 177,772 64.5% 244,591 Total 500,506 305,513 244,586 78,148 177,772 64.5% 262,984 TOTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE 500,506 305,513 244,586 78,148 177,772 64.5% 262,984

NON-DEPARTMENTAL
Non-Departmental
TRANSFERS OUT 4,311,777 4,129,777 3,295,942 - 833,835 79.8% 3,482,919 CAPITAL OUTLAY TRANSFER 575,026 589,026 392,684 - 196,342 66.7% 1,203,333 APPROP. RESERVE 500,000 385,799 - - 385,799 0.0% -
MEASURE C SALES TAX 35,119,802 79,250,477 17,202,027 - 62, 21.7% 048,450 26,212,226 MEASURE I TRANSFER 3,726,150 3,000,000 3,000,000 - - 100.0% - Sub Total 87,355,079 44,232,755 23,890,652 - 63, 27.3% 464,427 30,898,478 ANTICIPATED SALARY SAVINGS (601,260) (601,260) - (601,260) - 0.0% - TOTAL NON-DEPARTMENTAL 86,753,819 43,631,495 23,890,652 - 62, 27.5% 863,167 30,898,478 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 298,162,477 245,390,243 153,658,131 5,996,661 138,507,686 53.5% 149,191,071 ** The legal level of budgetary control is at the department level for the General Fund. Therefore, as long as the department as a whole is within budget, budgetary compliance has been achieved. The City actively monitors the budget status of each department and takes measures to address potential over budget situations before they occur.

For Enterprise and Internal Service Funds, the level of budgetary control is at the fund level. The City also monitors and addresses these fund types for potential over budget situations.

Page 7 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND
Revenue 245,000 245,000 184,031 - 60,969 75.1% 124,364
Expenditures 245,000 245,000 184,031 - 60,969 75.1% 126,219 Revenue Less Expenditures - - - - - (1,855)

CREEK RESTORATION/WATER QUALITY IMPRVMT
Revenue 6,772,647 6,772,647 4,919,001 - 1,853,646 72.6% 4,719,888 Expenditures 7,136,975 7,648,891 4,118,356 1,232,996 2,297,539 70.0% 3,932,938 Revenue Less Expenditures (876,243) (364,328) 800,646 (1,232,996) (443,893) 786,950

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
Revenue 1,147,812 2,066,275 219,224 - 1,847,051 10.6% 286,256 Expenditures 1,146,418 2,849,152 985,607 860,139 1,003,406 64.8% 168,666 Revenue Less Expenditures (782,877) 1,394 (766,383) (860,139) 843,645 117,590

COUNTY LIBRARY
Revenue 498,834 498,834 2,739 - 496,095 0.5% 1,582
Expenditures 487,876 490,058 292,579 5,308 192,172 60.8% 273,589 Revenue Less Expenditures 8,776 10,958 (289,840) (5,308) 303,923 (272,007)

STREETS FUND
Revenue 14,454,321 14,454,321 9,057,876 - 5,396,445 62.7% 10,236,923 Expenditures 14,583,350 14,735,691 9,274,974 204,903 5,255,814 64.3% 8,844,917 Revenue Less Expenditures (281,370) (129,029) (217,098) (204,903) 140,631 1,392,006

MEASURE A FUND
Revenue 5,211,328 5,211,328 2,796,564 - 2,414,764 53.7% 3,007,021 Expenditures 5,519,615 6,045,862 3,861,008 406,824 1,778,031 70.6% 5,292,851 Revenue Less Expenditures (834,534) (308,287) (1,064,444) (406,824) 636,733 (2,285,830)

CITY OF SANTA BARBARA
Interim Statement of Revenues and Expenditures
Special Revenue Funds
For Seven Months Ended February 28, 2026 (66.6% of Fiscal Year)

Page 8 ends

Remaining
Adopted Revised YTD Encum- Balance with Percent of Previous Budget Budget Actual brances Revised budget Budget YTD

REVENUES
Service charges 42,584,431 42,584,431 28,134,278 - 14,450,153 66.1% 26,682,788 Other Fees & Charges 30,000 30,000 16,914 - 13,086 56.4% 17,704 Investment Income 295,599 295,599 250,330 - 45,269 84.7% 162,084 Rents & Concessions 30,133 30,133 20,093 - 10,040 66.7% - Grants 21,651 230,118 - - 230,118 0.0% -
Miscellaneous 28,888 28,888 11 - 28,877 0.0% 2,702
TOTAL REVENUES 43,199,169 42,990,702 28,421,627 - 14,777,542 65.8% 26,865,278

EXPENSES
Salaries & Benefits 2,416,512 2,438,536 1,407,045 - 1,031,490 57.7% 1,275,036 Materials, Supplies & Services 38,686,000 38,932,089 24,513,364 7,713,485 6,705,239 82.8% 22,003,217 Special Projects 810,100 810,100 353,085 1,547 455,468 43.8% 348,212 Transfers-Out 200,000 230,000 133,333 - 96,667 58.0% 133,333 Equipment 220,600 489,994 84,464 62,055 343,475 29.9% 137,598 Other 40,000 40,000 - - 40,000 0.0% -
TOTAL EXPENSES 42,940,718 42,373,212 26,491,292 7,777,088 8,672,339 79.8% 23,897,395 Revenue Less Expense 258,451 617,491 1,930,335 (7,777,088) 6,105,204 2,967,883